RECORDS
OF THE
SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM
VOLUME 18
Published by the Museum Board
Adelaide 1980-1984
ill
CONTENTS
No. 1. Published January 1980.
A revision of the systematics of Australian sipun-
culans. (Sipuncula). (S. J. Edmonds) ......... 1
Nos. 2-6. Published May 1980,
No, 2. The distribution in Australia of the grass bugs
of the tribe Stenodemini (Heteroptera-Miridae-
Mirinae). (Jose C. M. Carvalho and Gordon F.
a ay a MOR Egy ae PO Ne Ares MOP er 75
No. 3. Two new genera of the subfamily Pentato-
minae (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) from the
Australian region. (Imtiaz Ahmad and Naseer
Ahmad Khan). . eis | Se Ss
No. 4. Some reanaries 0 on » the breeding distribution
and taxonomy of the prions (Procellariidae:
Pachypoiek 10. Bo Geox. on cca ede sat 9]
No. 5. Evolutionary systematics of Yemylla: XI.
Species from the Australian region (Insecta:
Collembola). (Maria Manuela da Gama).. 123
No. 6. Macropodid skeletons, including Simasthe-
nurus Tedford, from an unusual “drowned cave”
deposit in the South East of South Australia.
(Neville :S. Pledge}... .c.ce cee ae ess GH
Nos. 7-9, Published January 1981.
No. 7. The genera Laccobius and Nothydrus
(Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae) in Australia and New
Zealand, (Elio Gentili),........+..,.+-.. 149
No. 8 The Fabrician types of the Australian and
New Zealand Coleoptera in the Banks collection
at the British Museum (Natural History).
{Winifred P, K. Radford) ............... 155
No. 9. Sarcoptiformes (Acari) of South Australian
soils. 1. Notation; 2. Bifemorata and Ptyctima
(Cryptostigmata). (David C. Lee)
Nos. 10-13. Published September 1981,
No. 10. Evolutionary systematics of Xenylla. XII.
Redescription of X. occidentalis Womersley and
a comparison of the chaetotaxy of . arenosa
Uchida and Tamura and ¥. fittoralis Womersley
(Insecta: Collembola). (Maria Manuela da Gama)
Ne eee OR Ae ee i a at Se peg) ct fs 223
No. Il. A new species of ce i genus Cafacanthus
Spinola (Heteroptera: Pentatomidac: Pentato-
minae) from the New Hebrides with morpho-
logical notes on two other Australasian species and
their relationships. (Imtiaz Ahmad and Syed
Bearivalchany he os cG a nd eed ¢ ples te ce kee 227
No, 12. The fossil pelicans of Australasia. (Pat
Vickers Rich and G. F, Van Tets)........ 235
No, 13. On some oviparous filarial nematodes
mainly from Australian birds. (Odile Bain and
Patricia M. Mawson). ......-.-..000ee0 265
Nos. 14-16, Published June 1982.
No, 14. Observations on Chyzeria Canestrini and
some related genera (Acarina: Trombidioidea) with
remarks on the classification of the superfamily
and description of a pygmephorid mite phoretic
on Chyzeria. (R. V. Southcott) .......... 285
No. 15. Sarcoptiformes (Acari) of South Australian
soils. 3. Arthronotina (Cryptostigmata). (David C.
Jie? Tig eye ays mega, a ey 1 ee a 327
No, 16. Polyclad turbellarians from the southern
coasts of Australia. (Stephen Prudhoe)... 361
Nos. 17-18. Published April 1983.
No. 17. Helminth type specimens in the South
Australian Museum. 1. Nematoda. (Lesley R.
TU TREE po Mg en ee ed et eRe Mk end 385
No, 18. Reproductive biology of the frogs of the
Magela Creek system, Northern Territory.
(Michael J. Tyler, Graeme A. Crook and Margaret
RSH OR Up en antlers ets Baal oh cetyten MA SVG PEN :
Nos. 19-23. Published May 1984.
No, 19. The taxonomy of the Atrax adelaidensis
species-group (Macrothelinae: Mygalomorphae)
with notes on burrowing behaviour. (M. R. Gray)
Be Pe ey ih ta ae, He ae eg gt 44]
No. 20. The Psocoptera (Insecta) of South Australia.
(€> DE Siithersh ae ee rte ee
No, 21. Helminth type-specimens in the South
Australian Museum. II. Acanthocephala and
Cestoda. (Lesley R. Smales)............. 492
No, 22. Helminth type-specimens in the South
Australian Museum. Ill. Trematoda. (Lesley R.
Smales) 503
No, 23. A revision of the genus Aplerotus Dallas
(Heteroptera: Pentatomidae: Pentatominae) with
description of a new species from South Australia,
(Imtiaz Ahmad, Naseer Ahmad Khan and Sved
Kaimaltiddin) 5... 0 ces 06.05snueaeneae 513
CONTRIBUTORS
AHMAD, IMTIAZ and KAMALUDDIN, SYED
A new species of the genus Cafacanthus Spinola
(Heteroptera: Pentatomidae: Pentatominae) from the
New Hebrides with morphological notes on two
other Australasian species and their relationships
“TEE A A a eg aes Cott Sener Coie 227
AHMAD IMTIAZ and KHAN, NASEER AHMAD
Two new genera of the subfamily Pentatominae
(Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) from the Australian
PUNT ceases Pee aes cee en 83
AHMAD, IMTIAZ; KHAN, NASSER AHMAD and
KAMALUDDIN, SYED
A revision of the genus Aplerorus Dallas (Hetero-
ptera: Pentatomidae: Pentatominae) with description
of a new species from South Australia...... 313
BAIN, ODILE and MAWSON, PATRICIA M.
On some oviparous filarial nematodes mainly from
Puistraam GINS seat Peed ew cess 265
CARVALHO, JOSE C. M. and GROSS, GORDON F.
The distribution in Australia of the grass bugs of
the tribe Stenodemini (Heteroptera-Miridae-
UTI AG WaT Neh de Weg bt 8 4 ales of sescdln oseg tee 74
COX, J. B.
Some remarks on the breeding distribution and
taxonomy of the prions (Procellariidae: Pachyprila)
CROOK, GRAEME A.
Bee rMichsel THe cic ek ce gene a bees
DA GAMA, MARIA MANUELA
Evolutionary systematics of Nenvila: XI. Species
from the Australian region (Insecta: Collembola)
Bee SP gh ct rt eke jc ec is pee 123
Evolutionary systematics of Xenylla. II. Redeserip-
tion of X. occidentalis Womersley and a comparison
of the chaetotaxy of X. arenosa Uchida and Tamura
and X. fittoralis Womersley (Insecta; Collembola)
If te a or etal oi Se aaa ear ea 223
DAVIES, MARGARET
Seeiichael Jo Tyler. .6 cs. vsea~ eee Soe
EDMONDS, S. J.
A revision of the systematics of Australian sipuncu-
fans TSP MTCUIST . oo. ands ee ee ee dee Fe wey l
GENTILI, ELIO
The genera Laccobius and Nothydrus (Coleoptera,
Hydrophilidae) in Australia and New Zealand 143
GRAY, M. R.
The taxonomy of the Atray adelaidensis species-
group (Macrothelinae: Mygalomorphae) with notes
on burrowing behaviour ................-. 44]
415
GROSS, GORDON F.
See Jose C. M. Carvalho ... 022 04 ve cues 75
KAMALUDDIN, SYED
See Imtiaz ARMA... os ee esas eres Bly OS
KHAN, NASEER AHMAD
See Imtiaz Almad... 1.00.50 caeeesaes 83, 313
LEE, DAVID C.
Sarcoptiformes (Acari) of South Australian soils. 1.
Notation; 2. Bifemorata and Ptyctima (Cryptostig-
STUN Atala se Pegg Se MS Sate sence 199
Sarcoptiformes (Acari) of South Australian soils. 3.
Arthronotina (Cryptostigmata) ............ 327
MAWSON, PATRICIA M.
See Odile Bain . . 265
PLEDGE, NEV ILLE 5.
Macropodid skeletons, including Simosrhenurus,
from an unusual “drowned cave” deposit in the
South East of South Australia............. 131
PRUDHOE, STEPHEN
Polyclad turbellarians from the southern coasts of
GET AU AM aie cipotter ats hits A, sepsis nest. oan te Dalene 361
RADFORD, WINIFRED P. K.
The Fabrician types of the Australian and New
Zealand Coleoptera in the Banks collection at the
British Museum (Natural History) ......... 155
RICH, PAT VICKERS and G. F. VAN TETS
The fossil pelicans of Australasia .......... 235
SMALES, LESLEY R.
Helminth type specimens in the South Australian
Museum. 1. Nematoda ...........-00.0005 385
Helminth type-specimens in the South Australian
Museum. II. Acanthocephala and Cestoda.. 492
Helminth type-specimens in the South Australian
Museum. III. Trematoda 503
SMITHERS, C. N.
The Psocoptera (Insecta) of South Australia 453
SOUTHCOTT, R. Y.
Observations on Chyzeria Canestrini and some
related genera (Acarina: Trombidioidea) with
remarks on the classification of the superfamily and
description of a pygmephorid mite phoretic on
Chyzeria.. A Mas Hee Be
TYLER, MICHAEL I, ‘GRAEME A. CROOK and
MARGARET DAVIES
Reproductive biology of the frogs of the Magela
Creek system, Northern Territory .......... 415
VAN TETS, G. F.
See PAL VICBETS. PUEB lr» siere t «8 SoA & oe ete 235
ACAI CSC esc cote cama v Sleha aiea ww ncele sn eres
PEA Wetec ing cet cataaete laud. mira. c'esi, wii tal 199,
POT aL Gee ee ee en 2 rsa a
adelaidensis, Atrax (species-group) ...........
PRReIN Ere ETN les ee co cee aye yp Spare ay tee hes
MST ETi WT ahs ae gee ee etn ae
PURI DEWCUEAIN No tre tcode-drm Seid sce eee a ws
Atrax adelaidensis ......505.-0c. 00004 eeeeeas
Bre Te AU eye cere g Aniedsa SG xe le eM ic eS
Birds (nematodes from) .........0..0000000%
UNECE Torres eo eats Sarr pra ee oar Cee Ce
Burrowing behaviour (of spiders) ............
RUC NTICC ate 2... vote cis ele oe teks. pce Sune
RCHISMEOA: «ss oa cn daied ev aass Re eee ee 123,
Cy PMOSMEMISIA. os. ke ace ew eels eee 199,
Fabrician types (of Coleoptera) ..............
Frogs (reproductive biology)..............+..
MEATS GO TUES tg Pe ets ew cn wae w Ve age pene de
Helminths .......0..080000005 265, 385, 493,
RSDETOPIEDA G14, ra s.s 9 2 cies ee Poe 75, 83, 227,
Biireniine sess... ciehae eae) scacee, rea or
Insecta... 75, 83, 123, 143, 135, 223, 227, 453,
Macropodidde. .. 0. scares abcececnnerereeeee
PRU ERE RESINS Se cctac, cloner es leaneica Walon mde 48
Vil
INDEX
493 Magela Creek System (frogs of) ............. 415
Bap, MUMMED IEE ale kG ss in. or an, 9 oo ere pamper eel ba 75
aE TNE rena ta Sart: vss “ean “eto ns a cen nar mcned TM neem eR eee 75
ed OTe ce Mein Socal Arac 9a four Glee Woe oe eee 285
223 Mypalomorphiae 2.2... sks eee eee 44]
- PUCREIAL OMI 28 crbat ons ana pecte iaa treed she Letom 385
44] Nematodes (of birds)... 0... .c6ecsunieee wes 265
Put Ceres re ee ee, SN nna < lain 4 cer Pre ie 143
199 occidentalis, Xenylla 223
265 f Peete os RES ea roe
BTS! Sei Tel nye] Sk Bate toot, ee ee -a oaSA , |
441 “Pelicans: (f0ssil) 5. cs. oe ae soe ee ee ee 235
285 Pentatomidae ......2s00ce cc eaeeceee 83, 227, 513
Penigtominge 6. G8 otk cae cise Wap mel, eS
227 :
Ps CEA oo Gis ids et hanes = eer ahaha ane et 361
493 :
293 PLIOMS.-. +--+ eee eee e eee e ees |
285 Procellartidae .......0ss005 settee eee eees |
155 Psocoptera (of South Australia) ............. 453
533 ELE AS it Tie RO a OR ror PO oe le eee 199
327 Reproductive biology (of frogs).............. 415
155. Sareopiformes soy ees eas eae ede ces 199, 327
405. SimOgeHenrys’, co es csc eg ee aes + ee ee a 131
75 SULT CUDA se 2 en Pian y Hae he cat oars en and abies 1
Sipunculans (see Sipuncula)
503° Spiders (burrowing behaviour of)............ 441
AAD S, PSTN EMMULIN yin ass aid ori vipat aw aad Byes Sar 75
= dha t: biw'r b: hae ee ee ae er rere) as 403
S13. Tromibigigndlea, 25 50 fica we bee cs ne men ale eee ee
143 sTUie ee Sav TeAMNE! whe. drapes a, edge ees dom y otis ws kensel ton ae 361
293 Type-specimens (helminth) ......... 385, 493, 503
131 ROTIWILE LS. © re Teer caste Soe ee ee ae 123, 223
RECORDS oF THE
SOUTH AUSTRALIAN
MUSEUM
VOLUME 18 NUMBER 1 January, 1980
A REVISION OF THE
SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN
SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCULA)
By S. J. EDMONDS
N MUSEUM
Adelaide
South Australia 5000
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS
(SIPUNCULA)
BY S. J. EDMONDS
Summary
The author lists 57 species and subspecies of sipunculans reported from Australia and has examined
Australian specimens of 43 of them. Three new species are described — Phasolion cronullae from
the shell of Gazameda gunnii (Reeves), Themiste variospinosa and Paraspidosiphon johnstoni. The
other species examined are redescribed. The Australian sipunculans belong to 4 families and 12
genera. The genus Themiste is considered to comprise 3 new subgenera: Themiste s.s., Lagenopsis
and Stephensonum. The genus Centrosiphon Shipley, 1903, because the types is thought to be a
Golfingia, is considered to be invalid. Specimens identified by Edmonds (1956) as Aspidosiphon
klunzingeri Selenka & de Man are now considered to be a new species, Paraspidosiphon johnstoni.
Specimens identified by Edmonds (1956) as Aspidosiphon steenstrupii Diesing are now thought to
be Paraspidosiphon formosanus (Sato, 1939), Phascolosoma heronis Edmonds, 1956 is now
considered to be a junior synonym of Phascolosoma stephensoni (Stephen, 1942) and Phascolosoma
dunwichi Edmonds, 1956 a junior synonym of Phascolosoma scolops (Selenka & de Man, 1883).
Aspidosiphon elegans elegans (Chamisso & Eysenhardt, 1821) is considered to include
Aspidosiphon exilis Sluiter, 1902. Suggestions about narcotising and dissecting specimens are
given and the ecology and habits of the group are discussed. Maps showing the distribution of
sipunculans in Australia are also included,
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (STPUNCULA)
8S. J. EDMONDS
Honorary Associate, South Australian Museum,
ABSTRACT
A revision of the systematics of
Aust, Mus, 18(1):
EDMONDS, §. J. 197%.
ee Sipunculuns (Siputcula). Ree. S-
The author jists 357 species and subspecies of
sipuneulans reported from Australia and has
examined Australian specimens of 43 of them. Three
new species are deseribed—Phascolion cronullae
fram the shell of Gazameda gunnii (Reeves),
Themiste variospinasa and Paraspidosiphon john-
ston. The other species examined are redescribed.
The Australian sipunculans belong to 4 families and
12 venera. The genus Themiste is considered to
comprise 3 new subgenera, Themiste $.5., Lagenopsis
and Stephensonum. The genus Centrosiphon Shipley,
1903, because the type is thought to be a Golfingia,
is Considered to be invalid. Specimens identified by
Edmonds (1956) as Axspidosiphon klunzingeri
Selenka & de Man are now considered to be a new
species, Paraspidesiphon johnstoni. Specimens iden-
tified hy Fdmonds (1954) as Aspidasiphan steen-
strupii Diesing are now thought to be Peraspidosiph-
on formosanus (Sato, 1939), Phascalasoma heronts
Edmonds. 1956 is now considered to be a junior
synonym Of Phascolosoma stephensoni (Stephen,
1942) and Phascolosama dunwichi Edmonds, 1956 a
junior synonym of Phascolosoma scolops (Selenka &
de Man, 1883), Aspidosiphon elegans elegans
(Chamisso & Fysenhardt, 1821) is considered to
include Aspidosiphon exilis Sluiter, 1902. Sugges-
tlons about parcotising and dissecting specimens are
given and the ecology and habits of the group are
discussed, Maps showing, the distribution of
sipunculans in Australia are also included,
CONTENTS
!, INTRODUCTION Page
Aim of the study... 06... 00y 0. 1d 1
Characters of the phylum Sipuncula Las 2
Sipunculans, echiurans, ete. ,..... 0.5. 2
Where sipunculans are found |... ..- 2
The ecological rale of sipunculans 2
Narcotisation and dissection of sipuncu-
FetRS sHatelata se! the atalely eat elele a vuslniele 4
Previous systematic studies of Austra-
lian sipunculans ... 2. ..;.0y eyes 5
Australian collections of sipunculans . - 7
Acknowledgments ..........0.00.04- 7
Januar, [9s
Adelaide, South Australia, S000
1. SYSTEMATICS
Phylum Sipuncula and list of species
reported from Australia .... _.. 7
Key to families of Sipuncula ....,.... 8
Family Sipunculidae and key to genera 8
Sipunculus and key to species .._... 8
Xenosiphon and key to species... , 2
Siphonosoma and key to species .. .. 14
Family Golfingiidae and key ta genera 18
Golfingia and key taspecies ._,_... 18
Phascolion and key ta species ...... 29
Onchnesoma .....00.-..-, wpe 32
Themiste and key ta species ..,...., 32
Family Aspidosiphonidae and key to
PENESH i ke tom epee rete 43
Aspidosiphon and key to species - 43
Paraspidosiphon and key to species. . 49
Cloeosiphon ..,..,.. ce atta bls, 54
Lithacrosiphon .......: 54
Family Phascolosomatidae and ey to
BPENGra’s; yb seth b es eb eeh tes a]
Phascolosonia and ‘identification of
SPCCIOS pg ores ets psdeeete 55
Ill. REFERENCES ............0...0-. 71
I. INTRODUCTION
Aim of the study
It is twenty years since the last general work on
the systematics of the Australian sipunculans was
published (Edmonds 1955, 1956). In the meantime
more specimens have been collected and changes
have been made in the systematics of the phylum.
Some of the more recently collected specimens are
new species and others are species not previously
reported from Australia. Further, the additional
specimens enable information about some of the
previously described species to be extended and
imperfections in their descriptions, and even errors
in their identification, to be corrected. The aim of
the study is to bring up to date, as far as it is possible.
the systematics of the Australian sipunculans. Seeing
that many parts of the coast, especially the northern
ones, have still not been visited by collectors it seems
almost certain that more species will be found in the
future.
In identifying the animals I have relied mostly on
the description of their external and internal
anatomy, Little or no attempt has been made to use
some of the more modern methods that are
sometimes employed to separate closely related
species and to determine new ones, for instance the
2 REC. §& AUST, MUS, 18 (1): 174
use of electrophoretic techniques (Manwell 1977 p.
331) or the study of chromosones. The difficulties of
using some of these methods when most of one’s
material is already fixed are great. As far as 15
possible | have worked with the concept in mind that
a species consists of a population of animals and that
it is not just a single animal or type specimen,
Most af the specimens have been collected
intertidally or from the upper sublittoral zone and
only a few have been dredged. J have included
specimens from Lord Howe [sland but not from
Norfolk Island nor the eastern regions of the
Tasman Sea, although it is possible that the range of
the species may extend to the hame waters of
Australia. | have included the reeards of Australian
species not seen by me but which have been
identified by other workers. ! have made little or no
attempt to examine these records eritically but |
have included the species in the keys that are given
in the paper,
Characters of the phylum Sipunculat
Sipunculans are a group of unsegmented, caelo-
mate, bilaterally symmetrical, marine invertebrates.
Their body consists of two chief parts, a cylindrical,
globular, flasks or sac-like, highly muscular trunk
and a highly extensible and comparatively slender
introvert, that is capable of complete cetraction
within the trunk. The mouth opens at the anterior
extremity of the introvert and is usually wholly or
partly surrounded by « group of tentacles or a
tentacular fold. The introvert may be armed with
hooks ar spines (Sometimes both); it may, however,
be unarmed. Small glandular openings and hemis-
pherical, conical or rather flat papillae are usually
present on the trunk and introvert. Setae are absent.
The alimentary canal is Jong and usually wound into
a spiral for most of its length, The anus is. usually
situated dorsally on the anterior surface of the trunk,
In most genera two nephridia open to the exteriar on
each side of the nerve cord near the anus but only
one nephridiuin is found in the genera Onchnesoma
and Phascolion. A contractile yessel is attached to
the anterior region of the oesophagus. Antertarly it
branches into the tentacles but posteriorly it ends
blindly, Tt is usually single but sometimes double; it
may be simple or give off few to many tubules which
may be long or short. The blood cells contain the
Tespitatary pigment haemerythrin. The ventral
nerve cord is unsegmented and the brain lies dorsally
near the anterior extremity of the introvert. The
gonads develop at the base of the retractors and the
sexes, although Separate, are indistinguishable
externally, Fertilisation is external, cleavage of the
zygote is spiral and the larva is a trochophore. No
Pootnotet, Based on the characters given in Stephen & Edmonds
(1972); pp. 18-19
Taniary. LOST
segmentation appears during development. One
species is known to be a protandrous hermaphrodite
and two species are known to reproduce asexually,
Sipunculans, echiurans, holethurians ete,
Holothurians, sand-burrowing anemones, nemer-
tines and especially echiurans are often mistaken lor
sipunculans. ft is not difficult, however, to
distinguish between them. The introvert of a
sipunculan can be completely retracted into the body
cavily but the proboscis of an echiuran cannot. The
mouth of a sipunculan is placed at the anterior tip of
the introvert but in an echiuran it lies on the trunk at
the hase of the proboscis, The aius of asipunculan is
usually situated anteriorly on the dorsal surface of
the trunk but in an echiuran it is at the posterior
extremity of the trunk. Tentacles are usually
associated with the mouth of a sipunculan but are
lacking in an echiuran. Setae are absent in
sipunculans but usually a pair of them protrudes
from the surface of an echiuran just posterior to the
mouth.
Although they possess tentacles, anemones lack
an introvert, a tubular alimentary canal and
nephridia. Nemertines possess a posteriorly placed
anus, they Jack a body cavity and are usually without
tentacles, Holothurians lack an introvert and the
anus is posterior.
Where sipunculans are found
Sipunculans live in tropical, ternperate and polar
seas and their bathymetric range is wide. Many have
been found intertidally and others have been
dredged at depths of 6 860 m (Murina, 1964a p. 250,
Stephen & Edmonds, 1972 p. 4 and 79; Cutler, 1977
p. 155). Fisher (1952 p, 371) thinks that, being soft
bodied and defenceless creatures, they will prabably
live in any protected place that provides access to
reasonably clear water and food.
In Australia most sipunculans have been collected
intertidally or from shallow waters, They have been
found in limestone reefs, in reef-forming and solitary
corals, in mangrove flats, under stones, in fissures of
non-caleareous rocks, in clumps of mussels, in
masses of serpulid worms, in cracks in wooden jetty
piles, in the holdfasts of algae, amongst the routs of
niariné angiosperms, in firm sand, in fine mud, in
the empty shells of 4 number of molluses and in the
tubes and tests of larger foraminiferans.
Records of some species dredged off the
Australian coast are given in Murina (1972) and
Cutler (1977).
The ecological importance of sipunculans
Sipunculans perform a number of roles in the
environment. Most are detritus feeders,
some assist in the breaking down of limestone and
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPLINCULA) »
coral reefs, some Serve as food for other animals,
same live commensally with solitary catrals,
anemones and molluscs. and others act as either the
intermediate or final hosts of parasites.
The gut of sipunculans usually contains sand,
mud. small particles of coral or limestone rock,
Pieces of algae or marine angiosperms, fragments of
mollusean shells and echinoderm exoskeleton, the
frustules of diatoms and the skeletal parts of
foraminiferans, The information suggests that
sipynculans are detritus feeders and that they extract
any food contained in whatever they ingest. Chin
and Wu (1950) claimed that diatoms were an
important constituent of the food of a number of
sipunculans collected al Amoay. China. In her
experiments on the development of sipunculans Rice
(1970; p. 142) fed the larvae on algal cultures of
Phaeodactylum tricoraurum and Isechrysis galbana
and the larvae of Phascelosama agassizii on “mixed
diatoms and dinoflagellates collected from tidal
pools” (Rice 1973 p. 3).
Very little experimental work, however, has been
done on the feeding habits of the group. Peebles and
Fox (1933) observed (1) that Themiste (= Dendros-
tamu) zosleticola burrows in perfeetly clean sand
which contains no food but that in these conditions
the anima! does. not ingest the sand, (2) that the
tentacles are sensitive to small particles of food and
to traces of chemicals and (3) that the anterior
region of the introvert, the tentacles and the collar
are the most senstitive to contact with foreign
substances. It is possible, therefore, that sipunculans
do not indiscriminately swallow their environment
buc that they are able to exercise some selection as ta
what they eat, Gardiner (1903; p. 333) claims that
some sipunculans break down coral fragments into
smaller particles. They do noi, however. possess 4
erop and gizzard like earthworms or a gastric mill
like some crustaceans,
Rice (1976 p, 126) reports that there are at least
two patterns of feeding behaviour in rock-dwelling
sipunculans. Species with long, extensible introverts
and shor digiuform tentacles feed by extending
their introvert fram the mouth of the burrow and
grazing the surtace of the rock near them. She says,
"Phascolasoma perlucens,. maintained in the laborat-
ary in intact burrows has been observed to feed trom
the surface of the rock on sediment and detritus.
Some particles adhere direetly to the tentacles while
athers seem to be seraped off the rack by the small
hooks of the introvert.” On the other hand rack-
dwelling species with long filiform tentacles and
relatively short Introverts such as Phascolosama
antillarum and Themiste (agentformis make use of a
ciliary-mucus. mechanism, “The tentacular crown 1s
extended above the mouth of the burrow and
particles adhering to the sticky tentacles are directed
by ciliary currents into the digestive tract.”
Although sipunculans may mbhabit the tubes and
cavities made by other animals, it is known that
some species, especially those belonging to the
genera Phascolosoma, Aspidosiphon, Paras-
pidasiphon, Cloeosiphon, Lithacrosiphon and
Themuste are able to construct \heir own homes in
calcareous rock. Such species play an important part
in the breaking down of coral and limestone reefs,
The importance of sipunculans as members of a
coral reef community is discussed in Rice (1976: p.
122), How soft bodied creatures are able to bore into
hard rock is a baffling problem, The fesearches of
Rice (1969), Rice and Metntyre (1972) and Wilhams
and) Margolis (1974) suggest that mechanical
abrasion and chemical action are involved.
Sipunculans are 4 source of food for 4 number of
different animals. Kohn (1975 pp. 313-331) has
reyiewed the topic in an article an predatian on
sipunculans, Pallas (1774) reported that
Siphonosoma edule was used as food by the
Batavians and Sato (1935) that Sipunculus indicus
Was eaten by the natives of Palau Is. Chin (1947)
reported that Sipunculus nudusy was eaten at Amoy,
China and went as far as to supply a recipe for its
preparatian as a dish, Many fish eat sipunculans,
Kohn (1975) lists two orders of elasmobranchs and
six orders (17 families) of teleosts. He says that “the
fishes are all generalized predators on benthic
invertebrates but sipunculans, mainly Aspidosiphon,
are the major prey of the stingray Dasyatix
americanus and the margate Haeumulon album in
the Caribbean. In the trunktish Lactophyrs triqueler
and the economically important haddock, Melanog-
rammus aeglefinnus, in the Barents Sea,
Aspidasiphon spinoscutalus and Golfingia tar-
garifacea are only second to polychaetes in the diets
in nature. In other fishes sipunculans represent
subsidiary or incidental components of the diet." In
South Austraha small specimens of Siprunculus
robusms are sometimes found in the stomach of the
local King George (spotted) whiting Sillaginodes
punctaris, Some sipunculans collected jn such a way
by W. Zeidler (3/1/76) are in fhe callection of the
South Australian Museum (reg. no. E 1072).
Kohn says that only a few invertebrates are known
to prey on sipunculans in nature. Kohn (1970, 1975)
reports that the gastropod Mitra literata preys on
sipunculans that burrow in the intertidal limestone
reef at Oahu, Hawail. Sixteen of the 24 specimens of
Mitra that he examined were each found ta contain
the remains of one sipunculan. The species eaten
were Pheascolosoma scolops, P. stephensani (=P
heronis) and Aspidosiphon elegans, [is believed thar
the animals were eaten mostly during the night.
The sipunculan Aspidosiphon jukesii Baird lives
commensally in the base of the solitary corals,
Heteropsammia and Heterocyathus; the association is
well documented and described (Bouvier 1895;
Sluiter 1902; Stephen and Robertson 1952; Goreau
and Yonge 1968; Yonge 1975; Rice 1976), Some of
Rice’s observations are referred to in the present
paper on p, 49, Specimens of Golfingia hespera
(Chamberlin) were found as commensals in the
tubes of Cerianthus (Fisher 1952) and syllids are
sometimes found in association with specimens of
Phascolin (see p, 30), A list of same molluscs
associated with sipunculans is given in Stephen &
Edmonds, 1972 p, 342.
Sipunculans may contain parasites in their gut,
body fluids or tissues. The most commonly found
parasitic protozoans are sporozoans, especially
gregarines. Some of the records are listed in Stephen
& Edmonds (1972 p. 341) and further information is
given in Jones (1975b p. 349). Rhabdococles have
been reported from the gut of at least four different
sipunculans and encysted metacercaria of uniden-
tified trematodes from the intestine, brain, tenta-
cles, gonads and contractile vessel of several species
(Stephen & Edmonds 1972 p. 341). Nematodes have
been reported from the body cavity of at least three
species (Augener, 1903 p. 361; Edmonds, 1976 p.
222; Jones, 1975a p. 343).
Narcolisation and dissection of sipunculans
Sipunculans are usually much more easily
indentified if they have been relaxed before they are
preserved. The nature and arrangement of the
tentacles and the presence of hooks and spines are
readily observed if the specimen has been
narcotised. One way of doing this is to place them in
a dish containing sea water to which is carefully
added (drop by drop) some 80% alcohol in which
some menthol has been previously dissalved. It may
take from a half to six hours before the animals do
not respond to touch, The specimens should then be
left overnight in 5% neutral formalin and stored in
70% alcohal.
REC. S. AUST, MUS, 18 (1)-
1-74 January, L980
Not many sipunculans can be identified from their
external appearance; most require to be dissected,
One method is [o pin them out under water in a dish
containing a layer of solidified paraftin wax about
20 mm thick. Place the dorsal (anal) side uppermost.
With the aid of a sharp scalpel or fine scissors and
forceps cut the body wall longitudinally along a line
just to one side of the anus. Lift up the body wall
ahead of the cut so that the jncjsion does as little
damage as possible to the structures underneath.
Cut the whole length of the trunk and pin back the
flaps. Wash away coagulated blood with the aid of a
stream of water from a wash bottle,
In order to make a mount of the introvert hooks
or body papillae, snip off a small section of the skin
and place it on a slide with a drop of glycerine. Tease
up the tissue containing the hooks with the aid of
two fine needles. When the preparation is now
examined under low power single hooks or groups of
hooks can often be seen. Remove unwanted tissue
and cover with a caver slip, Only hooks that lie flat
should be drawn. There is no need to tease the piece
of lissue containing the papillae,
Figures 1-3 show some structures of a dissected
sipunculan.
A glossary of terms used in sipunculan taxonomy
is given in Stephen and Edmonds (1972 pp. 8-11).
Previous systematic studies of Australian sipunculans
Records of sipunculans from Australia are
contained in the following: Stimpson (1855),
Keferstein (1865), Baird (1868), Selenka & de Man
(1883), Augener (1903), Kesteven (1903), Fischer
(1914, 1919a, 1921, 1927), Monro (1931), Wheeler
(1938), Edmonds (1955, 1956), Murina (1964a,
1972), Cutler (1977) and Gibbs (1978),
More general information about the systematics of
the phylum is given in Hyman (1959), Tétry (1959),
Fisher (1952), Stephen & Edmonds (1972), Cutler
(1973) and Cutler & Murina (1977),
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCULA)
FIGS, 1-3, Diagrams showing some of the external and internal characters of sipunculans. The specimen in Fig. | has been dissected
from the dorsal side, a, anus; as, anal shield; c, caecum; cm, circular musc!e; cs, caudal shield; ev, contractile vessel: dr, dorsal
retractor; f, fastening muscles; g, gonad; h, hooks; i, introvert; in, intestine; Im, longitudinal muscle: m, mesentery; md, mid-
dorsal line; mo, mouth; n, nephridia; ne, nerve cord; np, nephridiopore; o, oesophagus; p, papillae; r, rectum: sm, spindle muscle;
t, tentacles; tf, tentacular fold; tp, triangular papillae; tr, trunk; vr, ventral retractor; wm, wing muscle.
6 REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18 (1); 1-74 January, 1980
FIGS. 4-17. Diagrams of Australian genera of sipunculans; 4, Sipunculus; 5, Xenosiphon; 6, Siphonosoma; 7, Golfingia, 8,
Onchnesoma; 9 & 10, Themiste; 11, Phascolion (in shell); 12, Phascolion (removed from shell); 13, Aspidosiphon; 14,
Paraspidosiphon; 15, Cloeosiphon; 16, Lithacrosiphon; 17, Phascolosoma (The numbers along the scale give its length in mm)
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF ALISTRALIAWN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCL/LA) 7
Australian collections of sipunculans
Collections of sipunculans are held in the
Museums of all the States of Australia, The largest
are those in the Austrahan Museum, Sydney and the
South Australian Museum, Adelaide, A list of all
the specimens in the latter Museum and their
registered numbers is available on application to the
Museum.
In the present paper the following abbreviations
are used in referring to the collections: AMS—Aus-
tralian Museum. Sydney: SAM—South Australian
Museum, Adelaide; NMV—National Museum Vie-
toria, Melbourne, WAM—Western Australian
Museum, Perth; TM--Tasmanian Museum and Art
Gallery, Hobart; QM—Queensland Museum, Bris-
bane, The number in brackets in the reference gives
the number of specimens in the collection,
Acknowledgements
1 am indebted to the following for the help that
they have given me: Dr. P. Hutchings and Miss E.
Pope (Aust. Mus,, Sydney), Dr, B, Smith (Nat-
Mus,, Melbourne), Dr. A. Green (Tas. Mus...
Hobart), Mr. W. Zeidler (Sth. Aust. Mus,), Dr, R-
George and Mrs. L. Marsh (West, Aust. Mus.), Mr.
A. Dartnall (Mus., Darwin), Mr. W, Green, Dr, D.
Fielder, Prof. W, Stephenson and Mr, 8, Cook
(Dept. of Zoology, Univ. of Queensland), Miss 1.
Bennett (Univ, of Sydney), Prof. E. Cutler (Utica,
U.S.A.), Dr. M. Rice (Smithsonian Instit.. U.S.A, ).
Dr. V. G, Murina (Sevastopol, U.S.S.R.), Mr, R,
Sims, and Mr. E. Easton (Brit. Mus. Nat. Hist..
London), Dr. van der Spoel (Zool, Mus.,
Amsterdam), Dr, G. Flarwich (Humbolt Mus..
Berlin, D,D.R,) and particularly Dr. P, E. Cribbs
(Marine L.ab., Plymouth, England) who generously
sent me duplicates of specimens collected by him at
the Great Barrier Reef. Mr. P. Kempster (Univ. of
Adelaide) took the photographs and Miss Lesley
Howard drew some of the figures,
Wf. SYSTEMATICS
Phylum Sipuncula and list of species reported from
Australia
The characters of the phylum are stated on p, 2,
(Specific names are in alphabetical order and
Australian specimens of the species marked * have
not been seen by me).
Family Sipunculidae
Sipunculus indicus Peters
Sipunculus robustus Keferstein
Sipunculus titubans filubans Selenka & de Man
Xenosiphon mundanus (Selenka & de Man)
*Siphonosoma australe (Keferstein)
Siphonosoma boholense (Selenka & de Man)
Siphonosoma cumanense cunidnense (Keferstein}
Siphonosoma novaepommeraniae Fischer
Siphonosoma rotumantium (Shipley)
Siphonosoma vastum (Selenka & de Man)
Family Golfingiidae
*Golfingia
Golfingia
*Golfingia
Golfingia
*Golfingia
Galfingia
*Golfingia
*Golfingia
“Golfingia
Golfingia
*“Golfingia
coriacea (Keferstein)
herdmani (Shipley)
impravisa (Théel)
margaritacea adelaidensis Edmonds
minuta (Keferstein)
misakiana (Ikeda)
murinae mturinge Cutler
ohlini (Théel)
pellucida (Keferstein)
schuerei (Augencr)
semperi (Selenka & de Man)
Golfingia trichocephala (Sluiter)
Golfingia vulgaris queenslandensis Edmonds
Phascolion collare Selenka & de Man
Phascolion cronullae n.sp.
*Phascolion dentalicolum Sato
*“Phascolion pacificum Murina
Themiste cymodoceae (Edmonds)
Themiste dehamata (Kesteven)
Themiste fusca (Edmonds)
Themiste huttoni (Benham)
Themiste lageniformis Baird
Themiste variospinosa n.sp.
*Onchnesoma steenstrupit Koren & Danielssen
Family Aspidosiphonidae
Aspidosiphon (Chamisso &
Eysenhard)
“Aspidosiphon exhaustus (Sluiter)
Aspidosiphon gracilis Baird
Aspidosiphon hartmeyeri Fischer
Aspidosiphon inquilinus Sluiter
Aspidosiphon jukesii Baird
*Paraspidosiphon cumingli (Baird)
Paraspidosiphon formosanus (Sato)
Paraspidosiphan johnstonii n.sp.
*Paraspidosiphon steenstrupii (Diesing)
Cloeosiphon aspergillus (Quatrefages)
Lithacrosiphon cristatus (Sluiter)
elegans elegans
Family Phascolosomatidae
Phascolosoma
Phascolosoma
Phascalosoma
Phascalosoma
*Phascolosoma
Phascolosoma
Phascolosoma
Phascolosoma
Phascolosoma
Phascalosoma
Phascolosoma
albolineatum Baird
annulatum Hutton
arcuatum (Gray)
nigrescens Keferstein
nigritorquatum (Sluiter)
noduliferum Stimpson
pacificum Keferstein
perlucens Baird
rottnesti Edmonds
scolops (Selenka and de Man)
stephensoni (Stephen)
KEY TO FAMILIES OF SIPUNCULA
(based on Fisher, 1952 and Stephen and Edmonds, 1972)
1, Horny, ¢hunous or calcareous shield. cone or cap present at
anterior extremitw of trunk. Longitudinal musculature oF
beady wall may form bands or be continuaus
Aspidosiphonidae™ (p. 43)
No horny orealcarequs shield, cone or cap present at anterior
region of trunk. 6.4.45, 2
Tentacles basically surround moulh ‘and f may be simple or
branched, lie in groups, be reduced to a few lobes of every
be absent but not lying in a horseshoe-shaped ring dorsal tq
mouth. Nuchul organ, if present, Is dorsal to tentacles und
not enclosed by them vount oe ee
Tentacles arranged ina horseshoe- Séagedtri ring which does not
surround mouth bur lies dorsal to it and which encloses the
michal organ, if present, Longitudinal museles grouped
into bundles, except in one genus of four species. Skin
usually bearing comeal to hemispherical papilhform
glands, usually largest and mast promiment at anterior and
posterior extremities oF trunk. Phascolosomatidae (p. 35)
Longitudinal musculature of body wall thickened to form well
déetined bands. Integumentary canals ar caclomic sacs
present in body wall (except in that of one spevies)
Sipunculidae (p. 8)
Longitudinal musculature of body wall continuous and not
thickened into bands. - Golfingidae (p, 18)
ine}
tot
Family Sipunculidae and key to genera
Sipunculidae Baird, 1868 (in part); Sedgwick, L898
(in part); Stephen and Edmonds, 1972,
Description: Adult specimens large and cylindri-
eal, Longitudinal musculature always in bundles.
Retractor muscles always four (except in
Siphonomecus). Mouth surrounded by a ring of
tentacles or a tentacular fold. Body wall of adults
with inteégumental canals or coelomic sacs (except in
Phascolopsis), Nephridia two. Type genus: Sipun-
culus Linnaeus.
Key to genera of the Sipunculidae
1, Introvert with sub-triangular, scale-like papillae but without
hooks, Skin of (runk marked into rectangles by intersecting
bands of longitudinal and circular muscles ..,.,... aA
Introver! without sub-triangular, seale-like pupillae. Hooks
or spines may he present, Skin not strongly marked oft into
rectangles (except in Siphonomecus) ...0 000 ee A
2. Four retractor muscles and an addifional pair of protractor
muscles, the latter arising from body wall near anus and
connecting with introvert near brain, Spindle muscle arises
anteriorly from wall of rectum, Gonad in torm of a fine
loop attached to body wall and rectum
XMenosiphon Fisher (p. 12)
Four retractor muscles but no protractors. Spindle muscle
arising from body wall anterior to anus. Gonads at base of
ventral retractors and not in form of a filamentous loop
Sipunculus Linnaeus (p. 4)
*Dr. P_E, Gibbs of the Marine Laboratory at Plymouth, England
has correctly pointed out to mé (personal communication) that
the tentacles of Aspielosiphon and Paraspidosiphon lie ins
horseshoe-shaped ring dorsal to the mouth, as in Phas-
colosamu. The statements of Stephen and Edmonds (1972: p,
19, 215-216, 238) about the condition of the tentacles in
Aspidosiphonidae, Aspidasiphon and Paraspidasiphon are
therefore Wrong und must be corrected. Lam indebted ws Dr.
Gibbs for his information. Dr. Gibbs (1977: p, 30) hus recently
referred 10 the condition of the tentacles in. Aspidosiphan
mueller’ Diesing,
REC, S. AUST, MUS.
wy 74 Vareey, PORE
3. Four retructor muscles - 215 cite on ef
Two retractor miuiscles | - . Siphanamecus Fisher™
4, Spindle muscle not fixed to body wall posteriorly. No
coelomic extensions i bods wall, Imtrayert withoul hooks
Or spines Phascolopsis Fisher*
Spindle nnrusele fixed posteriorly. Coelomic sacs or canals
present itt body wall, (qtiewert spines ar hooks present of
absent - - Siphonusoina Spengel (p- l4)
Genus Sipunculus |.innacus
Sipuneulis Linnaeus, 1776 p. LTS: Fisher. 1952 p
375; Stephen & Edmonds, 1972 p. 21.
Description: Usually large animals, often stout,
Trunk cylindrical and usually divided into squures or
rectangles by intersection of longitudinal and
circular muscles, Introvert short, clearly differenti-
ated from truok and carrying numerous, flat
triangular papillae. Mouth surrounded by a
tentacular fold, the margins of which in living
specimens form more or less distinct tentacles,
Introvert lacks hooks and spines. Spindle muscle
attached anteriorly in front of anus. Coelomic
extensions present in body wall, Contractile vessel
double. Post-oesophageal or “sipunewlus” loop
present in alimentary canal anterior (o intestinal
spiral. Paraneural muscle well developed. Type
species: Sipunciuluy midus Linnieus 1776.
Key to species of Sipuaculus known from Australia
\. Longitudinal musele in 37-43 bands, trunk very long and
rather slender se . S frylicey (p. 9)
Longiludinal ayuscles in less than 37 bands; trunk usually
5
SLOUY yy ee:
2. Longitudinal neces in 2: 30 (usually 29) hands, Uigitate
processes af brain rather threadlike a lulera!l in
position. - S. robustus (p.9)
Longitudinal muscles in 23. 26 bands; digitate processes short,
finwer- to leaf-like rather (han threadlike
S. nimagns fitbans (p. LO)
Remarks: Triangular, scale-like papillae are
always present on the tatrovert of Sipanculus and
Xenosiphion but not Siphonosoma. In Nenasiphon
two protractor muscles are present and the ganads
jie on a tilamentous Joop but notin Sipuncalis nor
Siphonesoma. The spindle muscle af Siphonasoma
arises dnteriorly from three roots and is fixed
posteriorly to the trunk wall, In Sipuneulus and
Xenosiphon tt arises anteriorly froma single root and
is not fixed posteriorly.
Fischer (1914 p. 1) and Murina (1972 p. 307)
identified single specimens from St. Vincent Gulf,
South Australia as Sipuaculus nudus Linnaeus.
Because §$. robustus is commonly collected in this
Gulf (see p. 10) there is some doubt about their
records,
* Species of this genus mit reported from Australia.
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCULA) 9
Sipunculus indicus Peters
Sipunculus indicus Peters, 1850 pp, 382-383;
Keferstein, 1865 p, 421, pl. 31, fig. 1; Selenka
and de Man, 1883 pp, 111-112; Edmonds, 1971
p. 137; Stephen and Edmonds, 1972 pp. 27-28.
Location af type: not known to author; specimen
from Mozambique.
Description: Specimen long and cylindrical,
Length of trunk 410 mm and width, almost uniform,
12mm. Posterior extremity slightly rounded and
swollen: invaginated terminal organ present. Surface
of trunk divided into small rectangular areas by
intersection of circular and longitudinal muscles.
Circular annulations of trunk very noticeable.
Surface of introvert bears sub-triangular papillae.
Longitudinal musculature in 37-42 anastomosing
bands. Four retractor muscles arise at about the
same level, the ventral pair from muscles 2-4 and the
dorsal pair from 9-13 or 10-14. Alimentary canal
with well developed post-o¢sophageal loop. Anus
opens anteriorly to nephridiopores. Rectum long
and fixed to body wall for most of its length. Small
caecum attached to rectum, Two long nephridia,
Opening between muscles 4-5, extend back past
point of fixation of reetractors and ate attached to
body wall for most of their length. Brain simple and
lacking a tufted organ. Contractile vessel double.
Systematic position: Johnston (1969: p, 43)
described Nenosiphon (Xenopsis) indicus from the
Laceadive Is, The species has two rectractor and two
protractor muscles arising from the body wall at
different levels (Johnston 1969, fig. 3). Since he does
not refer to Sipunculus indicus Peters and does not
raise the question of synonymy it looks as if
Johnson's “indicus and Peter's “indicus” are
different.
The Western Australian specimen, although it
shows similarities with Xenosiphon indicus Johnson,
is being described as S. indicus Peters because it
lacks protractor muscles. Its four retractors arise
from the body wall at about the same level, In
addition the brain is simple and lacks the “tufted
organs’ described for XN. indicus.
S. indicus is long and cylindrical, It possesses
about 40 longitudinal muscles and the anus lies in
front of the nephridiopores. Brain without proces-
ses, thus differing from S. robusrus and S, titubans.
Good illustrations of the species are given in
Keferstein 1865, pl. 31, fig. 1 and in Sato 1939, pl.
19, lig. 4. No previous Australian record,
Distribution: (1) in Australia: Western Australia
at Exmouth Gull,
(2) elsewhere; Zanzibar, Madagascar, South
Africa. Billiton, South China Sea, West Caroline Is..
Coral Sea (AMS W5734),
Specimens examined and locality: Western
Australia—Yardia Creek near Exmouth Gulf (1)
AMS W9250.
Sipunculus robustus Keferstein
(Figs. 18, 20-22)
Sipunculus robustus Keferstein, 1865 p. 421; Stephen
and Edmonds, 1972 pp. 36-37.
Sipunculus angasii Baird, 1868 p. 80; Edmonds 1955
pp. 83-86, figs. 1-4, pl. J.
Location of type: Hamburg Museum; specimen
from Uvea (Wallis Is.), Pacific Ocean.
Description; Specimens long, cylindrical and often
stout; frequently washed up on beaches near
Adelaide after early winter storms. Colour pale pink
and slightly iridescent, Trunk 60-260 mm long, 8-
20mm wide and usually divided into small,
rectangular areas by intersection of circular and
longitudinal muscles. Introvert short, clearly dif-
ferentiated from trunk, 15-30 mm long and 5-10 mm
wide, with numerous, posteriorly directly, scale-like
papillae but no hooks. Mouth surrounded by a
wrinkled fold, which in living specimens more
closely resembles finger-like tentacles. Posterior
extremity of trunk usually rounded and swollen but
sometimes pointed. Terminal organ present.
(specimen
from Tasmunia), (scale measurements
are in mm)
FIG. 18. Sipuneulus robustys,
10 REC. & AUST. MUS. 18 (1);
Longitudinal muscles in 27-30 (usually less than
30), sometimes anastomosing, bundles, Four stout,
equal retractors arise at same level in anterior third
of trunk, ventral pair from muscles 3-5 (2-5, 2-6, 3-4)
and dorsal from 9-11 (9-12, 10-12, 8-13), Anterior
region of oesophagus fastened to dorsal retractors by
thin mesenteries and rest of gut to body wall by thin
threads. Post-ocsophageal or “‘sipunculus’’ loop
present in foregut, Racemase glands and caecum
present. Spindle muscle arises anterior ta anus but
not fixed posteriorly. Contractile vessel double.
Nephridia attached between muscles.4 and 5 (5-6, 6-
7) anterior to anus, Bilobed brain gives off dorso-
laterally a number of delicate, thread-like digitate
processes,
Systematic position and remarks: Edmonds (1955)
identified a common South Australian sipunculan as
Sipunciilus angasti Baird 1868, a species described
from, Port Lincoln, South Australia. After an
examination of the holotype of S. robustus, Stephen
and Edmonds (1972: p. 37) concluded that S.
robustus and §, angasti are conspecific, the name
rabustus having priority. S, robustus ts well known in
the Indo-Pacific region.
A comparison made between about 50 specimens
af 8. mudus collected by me at Morgat, Brittany
(France) during 1961 and about 50 specimens of 8.
robustus: collected from South Australian beaches
confirms that the two species, although closely
related, are different. In S nudus there are 28-32
(usually over 30) longitudinal muscles while in 5,
robustus there are 27-30 (usually 28-29). In S.
robustus the digitate processes are rather threadlike
and somewhat lateral in position, In S, nudus they
are fewer, short, rounded to fingerlike and situated
more dorsally, The retractors in S. nudus usually
span six or seven longitudinal muscles while in S,
rabustus it is usually three or four,
Fischer (1914 p. 1) identified S. mudus from St.
Vincent Gulf, South Australia and Murina (1972 p.
307) S. nudus from Adelaide, Both records are of
single specimens. It seems likely that the specimens
are what IT would call S. rabustus-
S, robustus in South Australia lives below the level
of low tide on sandy beaches, The gut contents are
usually sand. Two smail specimens were collected
from the put contents of a fish, Sillaginodes
punctatus, caught at Marian Bay, South Australia
(SAM E1072), The body fluid of S, rabustus like that
of S. audus contains, in addition to blood cells and
amoebocytes, free swimming, ciliated urn cells
which are thought to help in the removal of some
waste materials from the animal,
1-74 January, {980
Previous Australian records: Monro (1931).
Augener (1903). Edmonds (1955), Gibbs (1978),
Distribution; (1) in Australia; Oucensland,
Victoria, Tasmania, South Australia and West
Australia,
(2) elsewhere; Palau, Wallis Is,, West Caroline
Is., Marshall Is., Philippines, Indonesia, Maldive
and Laceadive Is,, Madras, Madagascar, Zanzibar,
off South Africa (at 2.720 m) and Malacea Sc. (at
1 140 m).
Specimens examined and localities: Queensland
—Low Is. (1) SAM E1060 and (1) (Dr. P. Gibbs)
SAM E1057; Turtle Is. (1) (Dr. P. Gibbs) SAM
E1057; Townsville (1) EL052; Line Is. AMS G11388:
Hayman Is, (1) AMS W3131. Victoria—Port
Arlington (1) NM G1125;, Black Rock (1) NM
G1126; Hobsons Bay (1); Queenscliff (1) NM
G1124; Rosebud (1) NM G1128; Brighton (1) NM
G1123; Portland (1) SAM E1049. Tasmania—Seven
Mile Beach (1) SAM E1048 and (2) TM K103/154530.
South Australia—St, Vincent Gulf (washed up after
storms), especially at Aldinga and Sellicks Beaches
(80) SAM E1050, E1051, E1053 and E1055; Spencer
Gulf at Minlacowie (2) SAM E1054; Aldinga Beach
(2) AMS W3600, Western Australia—Rottnest Is.
(1) WAM 125/76, Woodmans Point (1) WAM
172/76.
Sipunculus titubans titubans Selenka & Bulow
(Figs. 23-25)
Sipuncilus titubans Selenka & Bulow, 1883 pp. [00-
LOL, Stephen & Edmonds, 1972 pp. 37-38.
Location of type: Zoological Museum, Humbolt-
University of Berlin, DDR.; speamen from
Puntarenas (coll, Griibe), cat, no, 1036,
Description: This. account is based on 12
specimens, two larger ones from the Gulf of
Carpentaria and 10 smaller ones from Moreton Bay,
Queensland. Al are cylindrical with body wail
divided into rectangles by the crossing of Jongi-
tudinal and circular museles, Body wall of larger
specimen thick but of smaller pink and semi-
transparent. Trunk of larger 80-120 mm long and
8-11 mm wide, of smaller 18-55 mm long and 2-5 mm
wide. Posterior extremity pointed, rounded or
formed into a glans. [nvaginated terminal organ
present in two, Introvert short (maximum length 10
mm), much narrower than trunk and bearing
numerous, fleshy, sub-triangular papillae. Tentacles
not exposed in any specimen but dissection shows
that a tentacular fold is present.
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCULA) 11
Longitudinal muscles in 23-26 bands (usually 24 at
hase of retractors), anastomosatan slight. Four
introvert retractors arising at same level in anterior
fourth of trunk. Base of retractors usually extended
laterally by strands of muscular tissue (making it
difficult sometimes to specify the span of the
muscles). Ventral retraetors arising from muscles
2-5, 1-4, 1-5 or 1-6, dorsal retactars trom 6-10. 6-11,
7-11 or 8-11, Anterior oesophagus attached to dorsal
retractors by thin mesenteries and post-oesaphageal
loop present im foregut, Rectum short and rectal
caecum presente in lwo larger specimens and twa
smaller ones. Two racemose glands attached to
strands of tissue connecting rectum and base of
dorsal retractors. Contractile vessel double with
roughened or vesiculated surface but no tubular villi.
Spindle muscle arises anterior to anus but not fixed
posteriorly. Nephridia about one fourth or filth as
long as trunk, arising between muscles 4-5 well in
front of anus and attached for about.a fourth of fifth
of their length. Brain bilobed with a number of short
digilate processes along its anterio-dorsal margin;
processes may be simple, stubby or leal-ltke and
those laterally placed may branch slightly.
Systematics: At first 1 thought that these
specimens might be Sipunculus aequabilis S)uiter,
1902 desctribed from Indonesia, A re-examination of
the holoiype (Zoological Museum, Amsterda-
m)—an already dissected specimen—confirms that it
has 21-22 longitudinal muscles, that its ventral
retractors arise [rom musele number 3 and the dorsal
pair from 8-9. [thas a small caecum but no racemose
glands. The specimens from Queensland however,
possess a greater number of longitudinal muscles
and their retractars span more muscles. One point
not previously reported is that at least three stout
swellings or protuberances arise from the fore-brain
of the holotype of S. aequabilis. L am inclined to
think that they correspond to digitate processes.
Although resembling Sipynculus norvegicus
(Danielssen, 1869) in many respects the Queensland
specimens differ because they possess digitate
processes, Recently ] examined two specimens of S,
norvegicus from the collection of the British Museum
(Nat. Hist.)—ane from Norway (1922-5-22-1) and
the other from the Bay of Biscay (97-4-21-4). The
brain of both lacks digitate processes. Confirmatory
evidence on this point is given by Akesson (1958 p.
138); “At about the place where the other species
(S_ nudus and S. robustus) have digitate processes S,
norvegicus has a muscular strand, a rudiment of the
larval protractor muscle, There is certainly no
histological similarity between the two structures
and they are not connected in any way.’
Sipunculus titubans Selenka & Biilaw, 1883 was
described from a Single specimen collected at
Puntarenas. Recently [ examined the holotype, a
dissected specimen. The trunk is about 48 mm long
and the introvert 6 mm, A tentacular fold surrounds
the mouth and triangular papillae are present on the
introvert. Longitudinal muscles 26 at base of
retractors and 26 posteriorly, Ventral retractors
arise from muscles 1-5, 1-6 (type description says 3-5
or 1-5) and dorsals from 8-11, 7-11. Racemose
glands and caecum present. Contractile vessel
double. Nephridia opening anteriorly to anus
between muscles 4-5 and fixed far half their length
As stated in the type description. no spindle muscle
iS present but the intestine has been damaged and
part of it is missing. Brain bilobed and giving off
from its anterio-dorsa] margin a number of short
tufted (possibly leaf-like) digitate processes, some-
thing not mentioned by Selenka (unless included in
the statement “Nervensystem demjenigen S, nudies
sehr abnlich’),
Consequently 1 consider the specimens from
Queensland ta be 8. titubany. The chief differences
are that in the holotype (1) the digitate processes
seem to form a tufted or brush-like structure while in
the others the processes gre stouter and (2) the
nephridia are fixed for half and nota fifth of their
length. The absence of a spindle muscle in the
holotvpe is so unusual in Sipunculus that it may
reasonably be regarded as accidental and not
general. Unfortunately no reference ta the absence
or presence of a spindle nmuscle in their specimens of
S. titubans has been made, as far as T can see, hy
other authors.
The Queensland specimens differ from Sipunculus
robustus Keferstein which has 27-29 longitudinal
muscles and longer and more thread-like digitate
processes and from Sipunculus mudus Linnaeus
which has 30-33 muscles. and finger-like processes,
Sipunculus zenkevitcht Murina, 1969, dredged from
the Pacific Ocean. has 25 longitudinal muscles, an
oval brain with two eyespats but apparently no
processes, Sipunculus longipapillosus Murina, 1968
has 24-26 longitudinal muscles but trunk papillae
with long extensions. Sipunculus delphinus Mutina,
1967 has 25 longitudinal muscles, retractors arising
from muscles 2-5 (2-4) and 7-8 (8-11), a caecum and
tacemose glands and seems very closely related to 8.
titubans,
What evolutionary or adaptive value the different
kinds of digitate processes have in the Sipunculidae
is not known, Metalnikoff (1900) considered that the
processes Were sensory structures. Akesson (1958 p.
136) maintains that they are not sensory but “forma
part of a Secretory organ, In the organ js
accumulated the neurosecretory substance from the
bipolar neuroseeretory cells in the anterior dorsal
margin of the brain. From there the secretion ts
given off to the coelomic fluid”.
12 REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18 (1):
Digitate processes have been found, at least, in
the following Sipunculus species: S. nudus Linnaeus
(finger-like), S. robustus Keferstein (thread-like), S,
timbans Selenka & Bulow (brush-to finger-like), S.
galapagensis Fisher (irregularly folded sheets of
tissue), S. marcusi Ditadi (leaf-like), S. natans
Fisher (numerous slender lobes forming a conspicu-
ous tuft) and S. polymyotus Fisher (very slender,
flattened, thin and digitate). Three or four swellings
or protuberances on the forebrain of the holotype of
§. aqeuabilis Sluiter are probably processes. The
processes are lacking in §. norvegicus Damelssen.
Fischer, 1895 described a subspecies, S, nmubans
diptychus, from West Africa which has 30-33 muscle
bands, retractor muscles attached to bands 2-5 and
11-14 and a spindle muscle.
No previous record {rom Australia.
Distribution: (1) in Australia: Queensland at
Weipa and Moreton Bay.
(2) elsewhere: North-west Africa, Canary Is.,
Gold Coast Gulf of Guinea, Senegal, Zanzibar,
Madagascar, Gulf of Siam, Thailand, West Indies,
southern Chile,
Specimens examined and localities: Queensland
—Weipa (Albatross Bay, Gulf of Carpentaria) (1)
AMS W9241; mouth of Embley River (Albatross
Bay) (1) WAM 231/76; Middlebanks (Moreton Bay)
dredged in sandy mud at LO m (10) SAM E1069,
Genus Xenosiphon Fisher
Nenostphon Fisher, 1947 p. 360; 1954 p. 312;
Stephen & Edmonds, 1972 p. 38; Johnston,
1969 p. 43,
Type species; Xenosiphon branchiatus: Fisher,
1947,
Description: Large, cylindrical and closely
resembling Sipunculus. Unlike Sipunculus in posses-
sing an extra pair of protractor or retractor muscles,
atising from posterior border of introvert near brain.
Introvert short and with flat, triangular papillae,
Longitudinal and circular muscles banded as in
Sipunculus. Rectum long and anus lies anterior to
nephridiopores, Gonads form a filamentous loop.
Integumental canals or sa¢s present
Type species: Sipunculus mundanus branchiatus
Fischer, 1895.
Remarks; Four species have been described for
the genus. They fall into three subgenera; (1)
Xenosiphon (sensu stricta) Fisher, 1954 p, 312,
Subcutaneous coelomic system consists of inde-
pendent, irregular sacs, some of which carry
papilliform gills. No accessory intestinal loop,
1-74 January. 198()
Nephridia long and attached to body wall by
mesentery, X, caribaes. Fisher, 1954 also belongs to
this subgenus.
(2) Austrosiphon Fisher, 1954
Type species: Xenasiphon mundanus (Selenka &
Bulow, 1883).
Subcutaneous system in form of longitudinal
canals lying between longitudinal ridges of body
wall, Accessory or ‘‘sipunculus’’ loop present in
foregut, Nephridia small and free,
(3) Xenopsis Johnson, 1969
Type species: Xenosiphon indicus Johnson, 1969.
Subcutaneous system as in Austrosiphon., Two
protractors and only one pair of retractors.
“Sipunculus’’ loop present in foregut, No cephalic
tube.
In Australia only one
mundanus, is known.
species, Xenosiphon
Xenosiphon (Austrosiphon) mundanus (Selenka and
de Man)
(Figs. 26-27)
Sipunculus mundanus Selenka and de Man, 1883 pp,
198-109, pl. 12, fig. 174.
Xenosiphon mundanus Fisher, 1954 p. 314;
Edmonds, 1955 pp, 87-89; Edmonds, 1960 p,
160: Cutler, 1977 p. 138.
Location of type: British Mus. (Nat. Hist.),
London; specimen from Sow and Pig Shoal, Port
Jackson, New South Wales.
Description: Specimens long, cylindrical and
superficially resembling a Sipunculus. Trunk 130-
270 mm long and 7-12 mm wide. Body wall divided
into réctangular areas by intersecting bands. of
longitudinal and circular muscles. Introvert short,
10-20 mm long and 4-7 mm wide, beating many,
posteriorly directed, scale-like papillae and a
tentacular pad oar fold. Annulations caused by
circular muscles usually less marked on dorsal
surface of postenar third of worm. Longitudinal
muscles in 28-31, slightly anastamosing bands.
Terminal organ present al posterior extremity of
trunk
Four retractor muscles arise at about same level, a
ventral pair from muscles 2-4, 1-3, 1-4 and dorsal
pair from 7-10, 7-11, 8-11. Two ribbon-like
protractor muscles arise fron body wall of anterior
part of trunk and are attached to introvert near
brain, Oesophagus long and straight; short post-
oesophageal or “sipunculus” loop present, Spirals of
intestine fastened by many short mesenteric threads,
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCULA) 13
30
FIGS. 19-31, Fig, 19. tentacular fold of a Sipunculus (after Gibbs), Figs. 20-22, Sipunculus rebustus; 20, anterior region dissected; 21,
brain and digitate processes; 22, subtriangular papillae from introvert, Figs. 23-25. Sipunculus titubans titbans; brain and
processes of three specimens fram Queensland: Figs. 26-27, Xenosiphon mundanus; 26, anterior region dissected; 27, brain and
tufted pracesses (after Fisher). Fig. 28, Siphonosoma cumanense: anterior region dissected. Fig. 29, Siphonosoma australe; hooks.
Fig. 30, Siphonosama rotumanum: hooks. Fig. 31, Siphonosoma vastum; anterior region dissected,
O-1
i4 REC. 8. AUST. MUS. 18 (1):
Anal aperture lies well anterior to nephridiopores,
Rectum long and attached to body wall, Smull
caecum present, Contractile vessel double.
Gonads in form of a fine, delicate Joop of tissue
arising on each side of rectum and running across
body wall to base of retractors and nerve cord.
Nephridia short, stout and free, opening between
muscles 4-5. Integumental canals lie longitudinally
between ridges of muscles. Brain bilobed and
capped anteriorly with a pad of tufted tissue.
Systematic position; This species is well known in
south-eastern Australia and New Zealand, Its
distinctive features are its two protractor muscles, its
long rectum, its short nephridia (in X. branchiatus
they are long) and the position of the anus well
anterior to the nephridiopores. X. indicus Johnson,
1969 from the Laccadive Is. possesses 40-45
longitudinal muscles.
Previous Australian records: Selenka and de Man
(1883); Edmonds (1955); Cutler (1977).
Distribution: (1) in Australia: New South Wales,
Lord Howe Is., Victoria and off coast of South
Australia at 1320 m (Cutler 1977),
(2) elsewhere: New Britain, New Zealand; Chile
(Tarifino and Tomicic, 1973).
Specimens examined and localities: New South
Wales—Gunnamatta Bay (1) SAM E1083; Pig and
Sow Shoal. Port Jackson (2) SAM EJ080; Lord
1-74 January, L980
Howe Is. (2) AMS G3950 and W1873; Bermagui (2)
AMS W2534; Botany Bay (1) AMS W2535;
Balmoral Beach (1) W1665, Victoria—Queenscliff
(1) SAM E1085; Portland (1) NMM G1217, Port
Fairy (4) AMS W9249. Tasmania—Binalong Bay (1)
TM KS25,
Genus Siphonosoma Spenge!
Siphonosoma Spengel, 1912 p. 264; Fisher 1950a p.
805; 1952 pp. 380-381; Stephen and Edmonds
1972 p. 43,
Type species: Siphonosoma australe (Keferstein,
1865).
Description: Adults usually large and eylindrical,
Introvert offen not well differentiated from trunk
and lacking seale-like, triangular papillae but
sometimes possessing hooks and spines. Tentacles
thread-or finger-like; no tentacular fold, Longitudin-
al muscles always divided into bands (sometimes not
readily noticed from outside). Coelomic sacs in body
wall. Four retractors. Spindle muscle arises
anteriorly from three roots and attached posteriorly
to body wall, Contractile vessel single and dorsal:
small contractile tubules usually present. Two
nephridia (usually with large crescentic nephros-
tomes). No post-oesophageal loop,
Subgenera: Fisher (1950a p. 805) divided the
genus into three subgenera.
TABLE 1.
SUBGENERA OF SIPHONOSOMA
Numerous rectal
Type species
S, australe (Keterstein)
S, vusnom (Selenka & de Man)
S runtinense (Kelerstem)
ee eee mn oo ovmmvvvwvoO oo
Subgenus Transverse
dissepiments caevat
Siphonosentd ss absent absent
Hesperosiphon absent presen
Dainostiphon present whsent
Remarks: Species of Siphonosoma can be
distinguished from those of Sipunculus because (1)
the introvert lacks scale-like papillae (2) the
tentacles do not lorm a fold (3) the spindle muscle
arises anteriorly from three roots and is fixed
posteriorly and (4) no post-oesaphageal loop is
present in the foregut.
KEY FO AUSTRALIAN SPECIES OF SIPHONOSOMA
i. Numerous transverse dissepiments attached to coelomic wall
oftrunk., 8. (Siphonosoma) cumanense cumanense (p, 14)
No transverse dissepiments attached to coelomic wall
. Rectum with very numerous, finger-like caeca or villi
S. (Hesperosiphon) vasium (p15)
Rectum without finger-like caeca or villi .... ;
3. Introvert with hooks, spines or spine-like papillne .....,
Introvert without hooks, spines or spine-like papillae
tm
= Ww.
Nn
4. Brown-black, slightly bent hooks present
S. (Siphonosoma) australe (p.
Light-brown, blunt, papilla-like spines present
S. (Siphonosoma) rotumanum (p, 18)
5. Longitudinal muscles 30-32
§, (Siphonosoma) bololense (p.
Longitudinal muscles about 20
S. (Siphanosoma) navaepammeraniae (p, 17)
Siphonosoma (Damosiphon) cumanense cumanense
(Keferstein)
(Fig. 28)
Phascolosoma cumansense Keferstein, 1867 pp. 53-
SS, pl. 6, figs 19-21.
Sipunculus deformis Baird, 1868 pp. 80-81, pl, 9, fig,
2: Edmonds, 1955 p. 90.
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPLINCULA) \
Siphonasoma cumanense: Edmonds 1955 pp. 90-92;
Stephen and Edmonds, 1972 pp. 46-49.
Location of type: Not known by author; specinien
from Venezuela,
Description: Specimens of various size und shape:
usually Jong and cylindrical. Length of trank and
maximum width of two largest specimens 410 x (10-
20) mm, 450 x (12-21) mm, and of smallest 50x (4-6)
mm, Anterior region of trunk usually swollen
Introvert not strongly differentiated from trunk and
for such a large species comparatively short:
maximum length 60 mm, minimum [0 mm and
lacking hooks and spines. Mouth surrounded by
finger-like tentacles which, although nurnerous,
seem smal] lor the size of the animal. Anterior
surface of trunk may be divided by furrows into
small areas enclosing flat, glandular openings.
Hemispherical papillae, with diameter up to 0-6 mn,
on anterior and posterior surfaces of trumk; lying
more or less in longitudinal rows and composed of
long narrow plates with their long axes placed along
the radii of the papillae. Body wall thick except
Where if is not traversed by cireular and longitudinal
musculature, such areas containing prolongations or
extensions of the coelam.
Longitudinal muscles in 18-25 (usually 20-22)
anastomosing bands, Four retractors arise in
anterior fourth of trunk at about same level
(sometimes dorsal pair u little more anteriorly), a
ventral pair from muscles 2-3, 3-4, 1-3, 1-4 and a
dorsal from 6-8, 7-8, 8-9. Sometimes retractors may
lic obliquely along one or two muscles rather than
transversally across a wider band,
Anterior region of ocsophagus fixed to ventral
retractors by thin mesenteries, Stout spindle muscle
arises anteriorly from 3 roots, one anterior to anus
and two from muscles 8, 9 or 10 near point of
fixation of dorsal retractors. Two tasteners, arising
from muscle 1 on each side of nerve cord, run to last
spiral of intestine. Rectal caecum usually situated
near point where 3 roots of spindle muscle meet.
Two strands of muscle arise from muscle 1 at about
level of nephrostomes, stretch across body wall and
attach to wing muscle. Contractile vessel with
numerous small villi. A series of thin crescentic
shaped dissepiments lie transversally on each side of
nerve card between base of retractors and postertor
extremity of trunk, spanning muscles 1-8, 3-7, 4-10
or 3-9, Two nephridia, attached ta body wall for
about a fifth of their length and extending to the
base of the retractors, open between muscles 2-3 or
3-4 just anterior to anus. Tufted organs on coelomic
wall near nephrostames, Oval bodies, 0-8-1-5 mm in
diameter, attached to inner body wall. Gonads at
base of ventral retractors, Terminal organ present,
Brain without processes.
td
Systematic position; These specimens possessing
body dissepiments but lacking introvert spines and
numerous rectal caeca fall into the subgenus
Damosiphon Fisher, 1950a. They are being iden-
tified as S. cumanense cumanense, a species
originally described from Venezuela and since
reported from other tropical and warm waters.
Siphonosoma edule Pallas, 1774, however, is a very
closely related species, so close that it is nat easy to
decide on a character that distinguishes the two. The
introvert af S, edyle is said to be shorter than that of
§. cumanense. The differences are discussed but not
tesalved in Stephen & Edmonds, 1972 P. 46 and 51.
As S. edule was described from Batavia it is possible
that some of these Australian specimens.are S, edule
(especially the specimen SAM E1090), A careful
study of specimens collected from Batavia and
Venezucla needs to be carried out, I think, before a
decision about the two specjes can be made.
Previous Australian records: Baird (1868). Fischer
(1921), Monro (1931), Edmonds (1955) and
Gibbs (1978),
Distribution; (1) in Australia: East coast from
Cape York to the mouth of the Clarence River,
including the Great Barrier Reef; North West coast
near Broome; West coast near Fremantle,
(2) elsewhere: East coast of America, Venezuela,
Florida; Indian Ocean, Madagascar. Zanzibar, Red
Sea, Arabian Sea. Laceadive and Maldive Is.,
Amboina; Pacific Ocean, New Guinea, Loyalty Is.,
New Britain, Philippines, Japan, Tahiti and Indo-
China,
Specimens examined and localities: Queensland
—Dunwich (in mud flats) (1) SAM E1090; same
locality (1) SAM E1091 (2) SAM E1092.
(1) SAM E1093, (1) SAM E1094: Low Is..
(4) SAM E1096; Sir Charles Hardy Is., (11° 55° 8S,
143° 28 E) British Museum, New South Wales
—Shelly Beach (mouth of Clarence River)
(1) AMS W3194; Port Denman (3) AMS. W1006.
Western Austraha—Kwinana (1) WAM _ 196/76;
Fremantle Harbor (1) WAM 199/76; North West
coast (1) Dept, of Zoology, Uniy, of W.A,
Siphonosoma (Hesperasiphon) vastum (Selenka & de
Man)
(Fig. 31)
Sipunculus vastus Selenka & de Man. 1883 pp. 103-
104, fig. 171, fig. 179.
Siphonosema crassum Spengel in Fischer, 1919a p-
279,
Siphonosoma vastum: Fischer, 1927 p, 199;
Edmonds, 1955 pp, 92-95, figs §-9; Stephen &
Edmonds, 1972 p. 55-56.
16 REC, 8. AUST. MUS. 18 (1),
Location of type: Zoological Museum of Humboldt
University of Berlin; specimen from Jaluit
(Marshall Is., Pacific Ocean),
Description: Trunk of Queensland specimen
about 260 mm long and 10-13 mm wide and of
Western Australia 57 mm long and 7 mm wide,
Introvert, retracted in both specimens, 15-50 mm
long; armed with numerous rows of curved, yellow-
brown, rather blunt hooks or spinelets, the largest of
which is about 0:1 mm long. Skin between rows of
spines divided by fine furrows into small rectangular
areas, each containing a small glandular opening.
Surface of introvert and trunk bears hemispherical
papillae, the largest (at anterior of trunk) being up
to 0-5 mm in diameter,
Longitudinal muscles in 22-26 anastomosing
bands, Two stout ventral retractors arise from
muscles 2-6 or 1-6, and two dorsal retractors more
anteriorly from muscles 9 or 9-10. Oesophagus
attached to ventral retractors by fine mesenteries
and gut filled with calcareous fragments, Contractile
vessel with numerous small tubules or villi,
Numerous larger fingerlike villi or caeca J-1-5 mm
long, attached to rectum), their function 1s unknown,
Anal aperture between muscles 11-12 at about level
of nephridiopores, Wing muscle strong. Stout
spindle muscle arises anteriorly from 3 roots, one
from muscle 12 anterior to anus and others from
muscles 11 and 8. Another fastener from last whorl
of intestine bifurcates, each root being attached to
muscle | on each side of nerve cord, Spindle muscle
attached posteriorly to body wall. A sac-like,
globular, rectal or intestinal caecum, feadily
distinguishable from the numerous fingerlike villi,
also present, Two nephridia, possessing prominent
semi-lunar nephrostomes open between muscles 3
and 4, are attached for about a third of their length.
Brain small and lacking processes.
Systematic position: The internal anatomy of
these specimens resembles more closely that of S.
vastum as shown in fig. 171 of Selenka & de Man,
1883 tather than that of S. parvum Fischer, 1928,
Previous Australian record: Shark Bay, Western
Australia (Fischer, 1919a, 1927); Queensland
(Edmonds, 1955).
Queensland at
Reef; Western
(1) Australian:
Barrier
Distribution:
Heron Is, and Great
Australia at Pt. Cloates,
(2) elsewhere; Pacific Ocean; Marshall Is,,
Funafuti, Rotuma, New Britain, Guam and
Solomon Is, Indian Ocean; Mauritius, Laccadive fs.,
Maldive Is, {ndonesia-
1-74 Tunuary, 1980
Specimens examined and localities; Queensland
—Outer Barrier Reef (1) AMS W1606; Heron Is.
(1) NMY coll.; Gillet Cay (4) AMS W9245. Western
Australia—Point Cloates (1) WAM coll,, Ningalloo
Exped.
Siphonosoma (Siphonosoma) australe (Keferstein)
(Fig. 29)
Phascolosoma australe Keferstein, 1865 pp. 422-3,
figs. 12 and 13.
Sipunculus australis Selenka and de Man, 1883 p. 90,
figs, 180-183,
Siphonosoma ansirale Fisher, SOT:
Edmonds, 196] pp. 217-220.
1950a p.
Sipunculus aeneus Baird, 1868 p, 76; Edmonds. 1961
pp. 217-220,
Location of type: Not known by author; specimen
from Sydney, Australia.
Description: Although specimens of S. ausirale
from New Zealand, Salomon Is. and south India
have been examined by the authar none are
available from Australia. The following information
is based on that of Keferstein (1865), Selenka and de
Man (1883), Fischer (1922), Fisher (1950a) and
Edmonds(1961).
Specimens long and cylindrical; trunk 130 mm
(Keferstein)—220 mm (Fischer). Ratio of length of
introvert to that of trunk half (Keferstein). third ta
half (Fischer) and almost three-quarters (Fischer),
Prominent, hemispherical papillae on surlace of
trunk. Introvert armed with numerous rows of dark
brown hooks or spines, (45 mm long (Keferstein),
0):22-0-34 (Edmonds), 0:3 (Fisher) and 0:2 (Fischer).
Longitudinal muscles in 15 bands (Keferstein) but
13-18 according to other authors. Four retractor
muscles arising at different levels in anterior third af
trunk, a ventral pair from muscles 1-3 of 3-5 and a
dorsal pair from 5-6 or 4-6. Nephridia long and free.
Spindle muscle arises anteriorly from 3 roots and
fastened posteriorly to body wall, Rectal caecum
present.
Systematics! This species lacks both body
dissepiments and numerous rectal cueca. It possesses
rather long, dark spines. The differences between S.
australe and the closely allied S. eniwefoki ure
discussed and illustrated in Fisher, 1950a, The hooks
of S. rotumanum, another allied species, are stubby
and rounded while in S, australe they are longer and
sharper. Previous Australian record: Sydney. New
South Wales (Keferstein, 1865).
Distribution: (1) in Australia; Sydney, New South
Wales.
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCLILANS (SIPUNCULA) 17
(2) elsewhere: Pacific Ocean; New Zealand,
Samoa, Fiji. New Britain, Solomon Is., Philippines
and Tasman Sea (at 610m). Indian Ocean;
Zanzibar, Madagascar, [India and Indonesia.
Siphonosoma (Siphonosoma) boholense (Selenka and
de Man)
Sipuneulus boholensis (Semper!) Selenka and de
Man 1883 pp. 109-111, pl, 12, figs. 175-177.
Siphonosoma hoholense Stephen and Edmonds 1972
p. 63,
Location of type, Not known; specimen from Bohol
(Philippines).
Description; Specimens very large and very stout.
Trunk 270-4140 mm long and 15-25 mm_ wide;
maximum width anteriorly. Three specimens dark
purple and fourth yellow brown. Body wall very
thick, Introvert completely or partly contracted in all
specimens; its maximum length about 80 mm. and
width 10-13 mm. A dissected introvert shows that
numerous rows of brown papillae ring the organ but
that hooks are absent, Base of introvert usually
more darkly pigmented than rest of body, Skin of
trunk anterior to anus rough and warty.
Longitudinal muscles in 29-33 anastomosing
bands, Prominent rather flat papillae or skin bodies
present on surface of trunk, Posterior extremity of 2
specimens is shghtly bulbous and a terminal organ
present. Four strong retractors arise in anterior third
of trunk, a ventral pair fram bands 4-5, 6-7, 4-6 anda
dorsal pair more anteriorly from 9-12, 8-11, 8-13.
Contractile vessel, with numerous very smail villi,
appears bushy. Spindle muscle stout: arises
anteriorly from three roots, one being fixed in front
of anus and others near base of dorsal retractors.
Wing muscle strong. Rectal caecum in one specimen
but not in second. Two nephridia, fixed to body wall
for about two thirds of their length, open just in
front of or at about same level as anus.
Nephrostomes prominent and surrounded by
numerous, small, tufted projections of the body
wall. Prolongations of coelom extend into body wall,
No fastener to last whorl of intestine found.
Systematic position: This is one of the largest
Species of sipunculans. It differs from other species
of the same genus most nouceably in the number of
longitudinal bands. In addition it lacks transverse
dissepiments and hooks. This is the first Australian
record.
Distribution: (1) in Australia; Queensland,
(2) elsewhere: Bohol, North Borneo,
Specimens examined and localities: Queens-
land—Yule Point, Townsville (3) SAM E1123,
Dunwich (1) SAM E1124.
Siphonosoma (Siphonosoma) novaepommeraniae
Fischer
Siphonasoma novaepontmeraniae Fischer, 1926 pp,
104-106, pl, 3, figs 2-4; Wesenberg-Lund, 1959b
p. 55; Edmonds, 1971] p. 140; Cutler, 1977 p,
139.
Location of type: Not known; specimen from New
Britain.
Description: Specimen stout, cylindrical, narrow-
ing slightly towards. posterior and dark purple in
colour in preserved condition, Body wall thick,
Trunk 190 mm long and about 12-15 mm wide.
Specimen contracted and longitudinal muscle bands
not apparent externally, Prominent hemispherical
papillae scattered on anterior eighth and posterior
third of trunk, their diameter being 0-27-0-55 mm.
Introvert, in retracted condition, about 45 mm long.
Dissection of introvert shows presence of numerous
rows of flat, circular papillae but no hooks,
Longitudinal muscles 17-18, with only slight
anastomosation, Four short retractor muscles arise
from two levels, a ventral pair from muscles 2-3 or 3-
4 and a dorsal pair more anteriorly fram bands 4-5.
Oesophagus shart but coiled intestine very long,
Spindle muscle arising anteriorly {rom three roots,
one being attached in front of anus, one to muscle 7
on right side and another to muscle 5 on the left near
base of dorsal retractors. Spindle muscle fixed
posteriorly, A fixing muscle connects posterior
region of intestine to body wall. Wing muscle very
strong. Gut filled with tightly packed coral
fragments. Caecum not observed but rectal region
damaged during dissection. Two nephridia, free for
most of their length, arise at about same level as
anus or just anterior to if. Contractile vessel with
very numerous shart villi, giving it a tufted
appearance, No transverse dissepiments in body
cavity. Brain not noticeable.
Systematics: This species can be distinguished
from other Australian species of the same genus
because (1) it lacks transverse body dissepiments,
(2) it lacks hooks, and (3) it has less (17-18)
longitudinal muscles than S, boholense which
possesses about 30.
Previous Australian record; Coral Sea (30° 05'S,
154° 33°F) at 1 560 m (3) (Cutler, 1977 p, 139),
Distribution: (1) in Australia: Queensland
(Heron Is.); Coral Sea (at 1 560 m).
(2) elsewhere: New Britain; Guam; Mauritius.
Specimens examined and locality: Queensland—
Heron Is., (1) SAM E1125.
18 REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18 (1):
Siphonosoma (Siphonosoma) rotumanum (Shipicy)
(Fig, 30)
Sipunculus roturmanus Shipley, 1898 pp. 469-470, pl.
37, figs 1-3.
Siphonosoma hawaiense Edmonds, 1966 pp. 386-
388, figs 1-4,
Siphanesoma rotumanum: Edmonds, 1971 p. 143, fig
4; Stephen & Edmonds, 1972 p, 71.
Location of type; British Museum (Nat, Hist.),
London; specimen fram Rotuma.
Description; Specimen cylindrical and slightly
curved ventrally. Trunk about 65-7 mm long and 8
mm wide, Introvert about 30 mm long, armed with
transverse rings of pale-coloured, blunt hook-like
structures, Although they seem larger than thase
described by Edmonds (1966, 1971), hooks closely
resemble those of S. retumanum. Papillae of two
kinds; one, found mostly on introvert, is small,
circular, about 0-1 mm in diameter, with a clear pore
at its centre and the other, found mostly on trunk
and few in numbers, is larger, hemispherical and
about 0:4 mm in diameter. None of papillae black,
as reported by Edmonds (1971).
Longitudinal muscles 15-16 and slightly anas-
tomosing. Four retractors arise at different levels, a
long ventral pair in mid-region of trunk from
muscles 2-3 and a shorter dorsal pair more anteriorly
from muscles 4-5; all fuse anteriorly. Alimentary
canal held in position by fine fastening strands and a
spindle muscle. Spindle muscle attached anteriorly
well in front of anus and posteriorly by several
radial-like extensions. Spindle muscle with two very
prominent lateral roots connecting with muscle 7 on
each side of nerve cord. Additional fastener runs
from muscle 1 (at a point mid-way between base of
dorsal and yentral retractors) to penultimate spiral
of intestine, Wing muscle strong, Rectal caecum
present. Nephridia slender, fixed to muscle 2 for
most of their length and opening at about same level
as anus; nephrostomes prominent and crescentic.
Tufted bodies present on bady wall near nephros-
tomes.
Systematic position: The specimen corresponds
closely with specimens of S. rotumanum in my
possession from Rotuma, Hawaii and Guam. The
“hooks” or adhesive structures on the introvert are a
little larger than those previously described and only
one fastener was found arising between the dorsal
and ventral retractors,
Much of the internal anatomy of S. ratumanum is
like that of 5, qusirale (Keferstein). The hooks of the
latter, however, are sharp. S$. rotumanum differs
from S, novaepommeraniae (Fischer, 1926) in the
possession of hooks.
1-14 January, 1980
Previous Australian record: Low Is., Queensland
(Gibbs, 1978).
Distribution: (1) In Australia; Queensland.
(2) elsewhere: Pacific Ocean at Rotuma, Hawaii,
Soloman Is. and Guam.
Specimen examined: Queensland—Low Is, (1)
SAM E1128.
Family Golfingiidae and key to genera
Golfingiidae Stephen & Edmonds, 1972 p. 77.
Description: Tentacles basically surround mouth
and may be finger-like, thread-like, branched or
dendritic; they may be reduced to a few lobes or
even be absent. No coelomic extensions in body
wall. Longitudinal and circular musculature continu-
ous. Tentacles usually interrupted mid-dorsally by a
nuchal organ, Type genus; Golfingia Lankester,
1885,
KEY TO GENERA OF GOLFINGIIDAE
1. One nephridium.._..
Two nephridia --.- -... --.., 2... | occe ap
2. Anus on anterior region of introvert near mouth. Single
retractor muscle. Introvert very long . Qnchnesoma (p. 32)
Anus on trunk and not on introvert, One or two retractors.
Animals usually inhabiting discarded shells of gastropods
and scaphopods, sometimes the tubes of annelids and more
rarely solitary corals ........ veeees Phascalion (p 29)
3. Tentacles arising from 4-8 stems and branching or dendritic.
Retractors usually two, very rarely four. Contractile vessel
with well-developed tubules or villi ..... Themiste (p. 32)
Tentacles usually finger-or thread-like and not branching;
sometimes reduced to a few lobes or more rarely absent.
Retractor muscles two or four... ..... 6: Golfingia (p, 18)
Genus Golfingia Lankester
Golfingia Lankester, 1885 p, 469; Fisher, 1950b p,
548; 1952 pp. 388-9; Stephen and Edmonds,
1972 pp, 77-80; Cutler and Murina, 1977 pp,
173-187,
Description: Often bottle- or flask-shaped,
sometimes cylindrical or sub-cylindrical. Longitudi-
nal and circular musculature continuous. One or
more rows of finger- or thread-like tentacles usually
surround mouth; in few species tentacles much
reduced or even absent, Nuchal organ usually
present mid-dorsally in ring of tentacles. Hooks
present or absent. One or two pairs of retractor
muscles. Spindle muscle may or may not be attached
posteriorly ta body wail.
Type species: Sipunculus vulgaris de Blainyille,
1827,
Remarks: The genus is large, containing more
than 100 species. Only about six of these are present
in collectians in Australia; mast of the species listed
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPLINCULA) WwW
in this paper are fram the records of other workers.
The genus has been divided into subgenera by Fisher
(1950b), Wesenberg-Lund (1959a), Stephen (1964),
Cutler and Murina (1977) and Murina (1967; 1975a;
1977). In dealing with the taxonomy of the genus [
have largely followed Cutler and Murina (1977) who
reviewed the group and synonymised a number ot
species. T received Murina’s latest subdivision of the
genus (Murina, 1977) only after the present paper
had been typed.
KEY TO SUBGENERA OF GOLFINGIA
i. One pair of retractor musciey.........., 2
Two pairs of retractor muscles _._.. . 4
2. Spindle muscle not attached posteriorly, ,-.. .-. ----. .3
Spindle muscle attached posteriorly .......... Siphonoides*
_ Phascoleides (p, 24)
.. Phy sanacardia (p27)
3. Contractile vessel without villi
Contractile vessel with villi.
4. Nephridiabilobed......... ., 2... Mitosiphon (p, 22)
Nephridia single-lohed ............... Pereere, rer)
5. Spindle. muscle attached posteriorly .. - Galfingiella (p, 27)
Spindle muscle not attached posteriorly ..Galfingia s.s. (p. 12)
Subgenus Golfingia s.s.
Golfingia sensu stricto Fisher, 1950b p, 549; 1952 p,
390; Stephen and Edmonds, 1972 p, 81; Cutler
and Murina, 1977 p. 179.
Description; Two pairs of retractor muscles.
Hooks may or may not be present, Contractile vessel
simple and without villi, Spindle muscle not fixed
posteriorly.
Type: Sipunculus vulgaris de Blainville-
KEY TO SPECIES OF SUBGENUS GOLFINGIA
REPORTED FROM AUSTRALIA
1. No hooks of spines on introvert
G. margaritacea adelaidensis (p. 21)
Introvert with hooks or spines .-.-..-... 0.24.4, em aly
2. Anterior and posterior extremities of irunk. of unrelaxed
specimens forming 4 cap or shield-like structure; globose
papillae presenton shield... .... _. G. herdmani (p. 19)
No cap or shield-like structure al extremities of trunk ,,.... 3
3. Spines tend to be straight; smal! swelling at hase of spine
G. vulgaris queenslandensis (p. 21)
Spines claw-like; no swelling at base of spines G, ohlini(p, 22)
Golfingia (Golfingia) herdmani (Shipley)
(Figs. 32, 36-38)
Centrosiphon herdmani Shipley, 1903 pp. 171-174,
pl. 1, figs, 4-10.
Location of type: not known by author; type
locality, Sri Lanka (= Ceylon).
Description: Specimens light to dark brown in
colour and cylindrical, When freshly collected or
fixed without relaxation they usually assume the
+ No species of this subgenus has been reported from Australia,
characteristic shape. anterior and posterior regions
of trunk looking rather like aspidosiphonid caps or
shields which are surrounded at their junction with
trunk by a fold of body wall, Caps usually dark
brown or rust coloured in contrast with light brown
trunk, [n relaxed specimens caps and folds. less
noticeable or may be difficult to discern, then
resembling more closely a typical polfingiid. Caps
covered with small, rather globose, glandular, dark
rust-brown, slightly stalked papillae tending to lie on
elevated, radial ridges of body wall which suggests
that longitudinal musculature in these areas could lie
in bundles, An examination of transverse sections of
the area, however, shaws that this is notsa, and that
the ridging is in layers external to the dermis, Nor do
sections show hardened or cornified structures found
in cap of some aspidosiphonids (Hyman 1959, fig.
219H),
Length of trunk of 20 unrelaxed specimens 25-65
mim, width 3-8 mm_ Introvert about a quarter to half
length of trunk, 2-3-5 mm wide and arising centrally
from cap and not ventrally as in Aspidosiphon;
anterior region slightly bulbous, Mouth surrounded
by numerous finger-like tentacles. Anteniorly
introvert armed with randomly arranged, hight to
dark brown hooks or spines 0:15-0:20 mm long.
Associated with spines at or near their base is a small
bulbous swelling of body wall which sometimes
appears to le between the wings of the spines.
Papillae on introvert base and on anterior cap
bulbose (with rendency to be stalked), dark brown
and 0:12-0:19 mm in diameter. Papillae on trunk
wall flatter, less pigmented, smaller and less
noticeable. Trunk may feel and appear smooth
although covered with small, white, glandular
openings. On posterior cap papillae dark brown-rust
coloured and about same size as those on anterior
cap.
Four retractor muscles separate for most of their
length, a strong ventral pair arising from about
middle of trunk and a weaker dorsal pair more
anteriorly. Oesophagus fastened for some of its
length to ventral retractars by thin mesentries.
Intestine Jong (about 20 double spirals). Rectal
caecum present. Three fixing muscles, either two ta
oesophagus and one to fectlum or one to
oesophagus, one to posterior spiral and one to
rectum. Wing muscle strong, sometimes extending
almost fo nerve cord on each side. Spindle muscle
strong, arising under rectum either from a triangular
flap of tissue, the apex of which connects with
spindle muscle or (more frequently) from two strong
roots (perhaps the lateral parts of the triangular
flap). Spindle muscle not fixed posteriorly. Nep-
hridia tubular but may be swollen near nepheidio-
pore, arising just in front of anus, about a third as
long as trunk and free for most of their length,
20 REC. 8. AUST. MUS. 18 (1):
1-74 January, 1980
20
FIG, 32. Golfingia herdmani, (specimens from Proper
Bay, South Australia).
Gonads at base of ventral retractors. Contractile
vessel tubular and without villi. Nuchal organ
present but not always readily noticeable. Two
eyespots.
Systematic position: The specimens fit well the
description of Centrosiphon herdmani Shipley, 1903
described from two specimens from Sri Lanka
(formerly Ceylon). No other record of the species
exists. Shipley placed them in a new genus because
they possessed, anteriorly and posteriorly, thick-
ened, ‘‘chitinoid” shields and because the introvert
arose from the centre of the shield and not ventrally
to it as in Aspidosiphon. Transverse sections of the
“shields’’, however, show that structurally they are
not differentiated from the rest of the bady wall and
that no chitinous bodies are present. When the
specimens are relaxed the “‘shields” usually become
less evident and sometimes disappear. Because the
presence of the shields or caps is an uncertain
character it seems unwise to use it to separate off a
new genus. The tentacles are arranged like those in
Golfingia, the papillae, the introvert hooks and the
internal anatomy of the specimens are golfingiid and
not aspidosiphonid-like. At present, it seems better
to me to call the species Golfingia (Golfingia)
herdmani rather than Centrosiphon herdmani. The
transference of the type of the genus Centrosiphon to
Golfingia makes the genus Centrosiphon invalid. I
FIG. 33. Golfingia margaritacea
adelatdensts, (specimen from
Aldinga Bay, South Australia).
have not been able to find Shipley’s type; it is not
deposited in either the Nat. Hist. Mus., London or
the Museum of the Zool. Dept. of the University of
Cambridge (U.K.), the places where most of his
types were lodged.
For some time I was uncertain as to whether or
not G. herdmani and G. margaritacea adelaidensis
were conspecific. I have decided against this
possibility because G. margaritacea adelaidensis
lacks hooks (they are present in all my specimens of
G. herdmani), its anterior and posterior trunk is not
modified to look like shields and globose papillae
are not present on its body wall.
The taxonomic position of the specimens,
however, is still unsatisfactory. Species of Galfingia
with shield-like structures at one or both extremities
of the trunk have been previously described, G.
(Phascoloides) rutilofusca (Fischer), redescribed by
Murina (1967) and by Cutler (1977), being one.
Golfingia sp. of Cutler (1977 p. 140) as shown in his
fig. 2 is closely related to G. herdmani and matches
some of my Australian specimens. Murina (1975Sa p.
1085) created Dushana, as a subgenus of Golfingia
to contain G. scutigera and G. adriatica both of
which she said, possessed shield-like modifications
at the extremities of the trunk. G. herdmani might
possibly fit in this subgenus. Both Cutler and Murina
now appear to have doubts about the subgenus
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCULA) 21
because neither of them in their most recent reviews
of the genus (Cutler & Murina 1977; Murina, 1977)
mention Dushana. Murina (1977 p, 212) now places
G. scutigera (Roule), the type of Dushana, in the
subgenus Golfingia s,s. No previous Australian
record,
Distribution: (1) in Australia: Proper Bay, near
Port Lincoln, South Australia.
(2) elsewhere: Sri Lanka (Ceylon).
Specimens examined and localities: South Aus-
tralia—Proper Bay (part of Port Lincoln at base of
Eyre Peninsula); amongst roots of Posidonia about
25 m from base of low cliffs at point where railway
line to Coffin Bay crosses road to Sleaford Bay. To
find the animals it is necessary ta dig up a square or
sod of Posidonia and pul] it apart. The animals are
well camouflaged. (15) SAM E1149;
(10) SAM E1158; (3) SAM E1143.
Golfingia (Golfingia) margaritacea adetaidensis
Edmonds
(Figs. 33, 39)
Golfingta margaritacea adelaidensis Edmonds, 1956
pp. 302-3, pl. 2, fig. 2.
Location of type: Australian Museum, Sydney,
specimen from Aldinga reef, St. Vincent Gulf,
South Australia.
Description; Specimens long, slender, cylindrical
and rather active when alive; yellow-brown and
tending to glisten. Trunk 60-100 mm Jong, maximum
width 4-7 mm. Posterior extremity usually tapering
to a sharp point, Anterior and posterior extremities
of trunk show no sign of ridging and no tendency to
form caps as in Golfingia herdmani. Body surface
bearing numerous small, rather flat papillae best
developed and most thickly packed on anterior and
posterior regions of trunk. They appear as white,
circular to elliptical structures about 0:1-0-2 mm in
diameter, in a yellow matrix of body wall. Introvert
slender, comparatively short, 20-25 mm long, 2-
3 mm wide and lacking hooks. Anterior extremity of
introvert of living and dead specimens usually
swollen into a bulb-like structure 3-6 mm in
diameter, Tentacles short, digitiform, white and up
to 80 in number. Body wall generally thin.
Two veniral retractors arise close to nerve cord in
anterior third of trunk and two dorsal retractors
more anteriorly near level of anus, Retractors
separate for most of their length. Oesophagus
fastened to ventral retractors by two mesenteries;
intestine long, consisting in one specimen of 34
double spirals. Spindle muscle arising from a
triangular flap of tissue beneath a strong wing
muscle and not fastened posteriorly. Fastening
muscles three or four, One (Fi) arises from body
wall just below left dorsal retractor and connects
with oesophagus. A second (F2), arising near origin
of Fl, connects with last spiral of intestine (and in a
few specimens gives off a short branch to posterior
oesophagus), In two specimens Fl and F2 arise from
same point, F3 (when present) and F4 arise hetween
right dorsal and ventral retractors and connect with
the last and penultimate intestinal whorls.
These specimens differ from Golfingia herdmani
(Shipley) from Proper Bay because (1) they do not
form a cap or ridge al the extremities of the trunk (2)
they lack introvert spines and (3) they lack rusty
coloured, globose papillae on the anterior and
posterior surfaces of the trunk and the ridges on
which they lie, both of which are present in G.
herdmani.
Edmonds (1956 p, 303) says that “a caecum is
lacking or possibly rudimentary’, Recent study of
more specimens shows that a small caecum is usually
present. The specimens are close anatomically to G.
margatitacea (Sars), described from Norway. and
reported widely from the northern hemisphere and
from the Antarctic and sub-Antarctic. Recently
Cutler (1977 p. 139) has reported G. margaritacea
from off the South Australian coast, Whether his
specimen is the same as mine I do not know, Murina
(1977 p. 230) has placed G, mtargaritacea adelaiden-
sis in the synonymy of G. margaritacea mar
garitacea. | find it difficult, however, to lump the
South Australian material with that described by
Theel and Wesenberg-Lund from Norway and
Greenland and that from Alaska described by Fisher
(1952). The spindle musele of my specimens is strong
and arises from a triangular flap of tissue under and
separate from the wing muscle and not from the
rectum as shown in pl. 23 fig. 3 of Fisher (1952).
Théel’s fig. 174 shows only two fixing muscles (there
are three or four in mine) and no staut fixing muscle
runs tO the rectum near the anus, as shown in Théel
(1905) fig. 174. In addition the specimens are always
yellowish-brown in colour,
Previous Australian records: Edmonds (1956),
Distribution: Known only trom Aldinga, Sauth
Australia.
Specimens examined and locality: In sand and
debris amongst the roots of the marine angiosperm
Amphibolis antarctica on the reef at Aldinga Bay,
St. Vincent Gulf, South Australia. (1) SAM E1159,
(2) SAM E1148, (1) SAM E1176, (1) SAM E1177,
(1) AMS W3603.
Golfingia (Golfingia) vulgaris
Edmonds
Golfingia vulgaris queenslandensis Edmonds, 1956
pp. 303-4, pl, 17.
queenslandensis
22 REC, §. AUST, MUS. 18 (1):
Location of type: Australian Museum, Sydney;
specimens from Heron Is,, Queensland,
Remarks: No additional specimens have been
collected since Edmonds’ 1956 record. There is still
doubt about the identity of these specimens, They
possess two pairs of retractors, hooks, three
fastening muscles and a spindle muscle not attached
posteriorly. The introvert is swollen anteriorly and
there is a weakly developed rim between the base of
the introvert and the trunk, much like that found in
Golfingia herdmani. The hooks, however, are
different from those of the latter species,
Distributians; Known only from Queensland,
Specimens examined: (2) Heron Is., Queensland,
AMS W362.
*Galfingia (Golfingia) ohlini (Théc!)
Phascolosama ohlini Théel, 1911 p. 29, pl, 2. figs 21-
23, pl, 3, figs 24-27. pl. 5, figs 69-70,
Golfingia ohlini: Fisher, 1950b p. 550.
Location af type: Not known; type locality South
Georgia,
Description: T have not seen Austrahan specimens
of the species. Théel’s account of the type specimen
reads, “Total length of body 16 or 17 mm, Body
elongate, subcylindrical, with posterior extremity
pointed, Tentacles slender, 16 in number, arranged
in groups on each side of the median line. Distinct
ciliated sense pads present, separating the dorsal
tentacles, Skin whitish, shining with small cylindrical
papillae, crowded at the posterior extremity of the
body and scarce at its middle, Behind the tentacles
mamillary wart-ltke papillae and scattered hooks,
both directed backwardly. Two free segmental
organs. Muscular layers of the body-wall contiau-
ous, not separated into bands, Two ventral and two
dorsal retractors. Intestinal spiral composed of
about 14 double turns and not attached posteriorly,”
Australian record: New South Wales, off Broken
Bay (33° 34°5 8, 152° 06'S E) (1) Murina, 1972 pp.
301-302,
Distribution: (1) in Australia: off coast of New
South Wales.
(2) elsewhere: Antartica and sub-Antartica;
Mauritius and South Africa: Chile.
Subgenus Mitosiphon Fisher
Mitosiphon Fisher 1950b p. 550; 1952 p. 393:
Stephen & Edmonds 1972 p. 113; Cutler &
Murina 1977 p. 180,
Description; Two pairs of retractor muscles,
Introvert hooks (if present) have accessory comb of
1-74 January, TOS)
spinelets at base. Nephridia bilobed. Spindle muscle
nat attached posteriorly,
Type Phascolosoma hesperum Chamberlin,
KEY TO SPECIES QF SUBGENUS MITOSOPHON
REPORTED FROM AUSTRALIA
1, Introvert hooks with4-5 accessory teeth
G_ misakiqna (p. 22)
Introvert without hooks... G. richocephala (p. 23)
(Murina, 1977 has now assigned G. (richocephala to
a subgenus Apionosoma Sluiter, 1902; G. misakiana
has been left in Mitosiphon).
Golfingia (Mitosiphon) misakiana (Tkeda)
Phascolasoma misakianum Ikeda, 1904 pp. 7-9,
pl. 1, fig. 3, pl, 3, figs 30 -33; Fischer, 1919a p, 281;
1927 p. 204.
Golfingia misakiana: Fisher, 1952 p. 393, Cutler,
1973 p. 144; Murina, 1970 p, 66, 1977 p, 236.
Location of type: Not known to author; specimen
from eoast of Misaki Bay, Japan.
Description; Four specimens, two in very good
condition and with introvert extended, were
examined. Specimens small and slender and
introvert almost thread-like. Trunk of largest 11 mm
x 15-18 mm and introvert about 40 mm x (:4-
0-7 mm. Bady wall thin and transparent enaugh to
show most of internal anatomy without dissection.
Mouth surrounded by 5 (26) swellings or protuber-
ances, probably corresponding to tentacles. About
20 complete rows of clear, almost transparent hooks
surround anterior region of introvert, Rows then
became incomplete and ultimately hooks sparsely
scattered, Hooks small, 0-022-0-027 mm tall, with
sharply bent tips and with usually five sharp
accessory teeth near base. More posteriorly placed
hooks smaller and may lack accessory teeth.
Introvert bearing very numerous, small urn-shaped
glandular papillae. Posterior trunk papillae about
0-20-0-25 mm in diameter and rather flat, consisting
of a few rounded plates arranged like the petals of a
flower, In mid-trunk, papillae are larger (up to
0-1 mm in diameter) and the arrangement of plates
less definite. One feature of specimens is that both
trunk and introvert are covered by a very great
number of very small “points’’ (possibly glandular
pores), placed very closely to each other, lying in
both longitudinal and transverse rows and making
the surface appear striated.
The most transparent specimen shows four
retractor muscles, two long, bilabed nephridia and a
posteriorly fastened spindle muscle.
Systematic positian; The specimens are consi-
dered to be G. miisakiana (Ikeda). The question
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SiPUNCULA) 23
arises whether G. misakiai a and G. trichocephala
(Sluiter), which js also being recorded in this. paper
from the eastern coast of Australia, are the same
species, a species with a genetically determined set
of hooks which for some reason concerned with the
animals’s environment may either be lost or never
appear. Cutler (1973 pp. 139-144) discusses the
question, He states that his specimens of G,
Irichocephala and apparently the type specimen
(since he examined it) lack hooks. Murina (1970;
1977) describes G, trichocephala as being hookless.
Neither can | find hoaks on some specimens from
Moreton Bay, Queensland which | have called G.
trichocephala nor on some from Madagascar, sent to
me by Dr. Thomassin, Murina must consider the two
species valid because she described both of them in
her 1977 paper and | think it best to regard them so,
at present. If the two are the same it is remarkable
that specimens with and without hooks have not
been found together in the same collection.
Nevertheless many characters of my specimens of G,
misakiana correspond with those of G. trichocephala
e.g., size and shape, anterior region of introvert and
papillae (Murina, 1977, fig. 162), bilobed nephridia,
tour retractor muscles and even the fine striations on
the surface of the trunk and introvert, Which are
present in both my specimens of the two species.
The figures of the species were drawn from the
specimen SAM E1161. The specimens lack the large
papillae on the posterior surface of the trunk,
present in G. murinae Cutler, 1969
Previous Australian teeord: Western Australia
(Fischer, 19194).
Distribution: (1) in Australia: Western Australia
at Shark Bay, 6-9 m (Fischer 1919a); N.S.W. at
Broughton Is.
(2) elsewhere; Japan; New Guinea, Tanzania and
Easter Is. (Murina 1977 p.. 238).
Specimens examined and localities: N.S.W. at
Broughton I... amongst roots of marine angiosperm
Posidonia (Collet and Pat Hutchings) (2) AMS
W13157, (1) AMS W1299], (1) SAM E1161.
Golfingia (Mitosiphon) trichocephala (Sluiter)
(Figs. 34, 40)
Apionsoma irichocephalum Sluiter, 1902 pp. 42-44,
pl. 4, figs. 8-11; Murina, 1977 p, 236.
Golfingia trichocephala Murina, 1972 p. 303; Cutler,
1973 p. 139; Cutler and Murina, 1977 p. 180.
Location of type: Zoological Museum, Amsterdam;
specimen from near Surdbaya, Java, Indonesia.
Description: Small, white-brown, slender species
with a long, almost thread-like introvert. Trunk 3:0-
S:lmm long, maximum width usually less than
1 mm; curved ventrally in most specimens. Posterior
extremity pointed. Bedy wall thin and internal
structures often visible under strong light. Introvert
45 mm long in specimen with trunk 4-1 mm long,
lacking hooks and tentacles,
FIG.
Moreton Bay, Queensland), Scale measurements are
in mm
34. Golfingia wmichacephala, (specimen from
Longitudinal musculature continuous. Four slen-
der retractor muscles, a ventral pair arising very
close to nerve cord in middle of trunk and a dorsal
pair more anteriorly. Intestine long, coiled and
slender, No rectal caecum observed in 2 dissected
specimens. Spindle muscle fixed posteriorly to body
wall. Rectum attached to body wall near anus by a
strand of tissue. Suspension at this point accounts for
what Culter (1973) described as a “penuflection in
the rectum’’, Contractile vessel inconspicuous. Two
yellow-brown, free, bilobed nephridia of equal
length opening anteriorly to anal aperture.
Systematic position; Apiosoma trichocephalum
Sluiter, 1902 was dredged. at 56 m from Indonesia
(lat, 7° 25’ §, long. 113° 16'E) and described as
possessing nephridia with single lobes, Cutler (1973
p. 138) re-examined Sluiter’s type and found that the
nephridia were bilobed. After a careful study of the
type specimens he concluded that G. tenuissima
Wesenberg-Lund, 1959a and G, longirostris Wesen-
berg-Lund 1959a were junior synonyms of G
trichacephala, Murina (1977 p. 180) removed it froin
the subgenus Mitosiphon and placed it in Apiosoma
which she now regards as a subgenus.
Fischer (19194) reported Golfingia misakiana
(Ikeda) from Shark Bay, Western Australia, G,
misakiana and G. trichocephala are alike in many
respects. The former, however, is described as
wu REC, 5. AUST. MUS. 18 (1):
possessing introvert hooks with accessory teeth, The
specimens in the present collection from Rottnest
Is., like those from Queensland, lack hooks.
G. trichocephala is identified by its small size, a
very long slender introvert lacking hooks and
tentacles, the presence of four retractors and two
bilobed nephridia.
Previous Australian record; off coast of New
South Wales (33° 34’ S, 152° 16’ EB) by Murina
(1972).
Distribution: (1) in Australia: Queensland, New
South Wales and Western Australia.
(2) elsewhere: South Africa and West Africa
(Wesenberg-Lund, 1959a, 19596, 1963); Western
Atlantic (Cutler, 1973); Indonesia (Sluiter, 1902);
Coral Sea and Tasman Sea (Cutler, 1977); Gulf of
Aden (Murina, 1970),
Specimens examined and localities; Queensland
—Moreton Bay (8), dredged by 8S. Cook (Dept, of
Zoology, Univ. of Queensland), SAM E1152; same
locality (5) coll. W, Green (Univ. of Queensland)
SAM E1150 and SAM E1154, Western Aus-
tralia—William Bay, Rottnest Is. (2) AMS W10565.
Subgenus Phascoloides Fisher
Phascoloides Fisher 1950b p, 550; 1952 p. 395:
Stephen and Edmonds, 1972 p. 131; Cutler and
Murina 1977 p. 182; Murina, 1977 p. 180.
Description; One pair of retractor muscles.
Introvert with or without hooks. Contractile vessel
simple and without villi. Spindle muscle, if present.
not atlached posteriorly,
Type: Sipiinculus eremitus Sars, 1851,
(Murina 1977 p. 180 has replaced Phascoloides
Fisher, 1950b by Nephasoma Pergament 1946 on the
grounds of priority, Her argument is that since
Nephasoma marinki Pergament, 1946 = Golfingia
glacialis Danielssen and Koren, 1881 and because
Fisher (1950b) placed G. glacialis in his subgenus
Phascoloides the term Nephasoma is an older name
in the group).
KEY TO SPECIES OF PHASCOLOJDES RECORDED
FROM AUSTRALIA
1. Tentacles absent or reduced to leaf-like structures or lobular
projections... .-. “GG. minuta (p. 24)
SS ee Geet ir pegh te ss fs ROR PIEE ND By
Tentacles numerous and finger-like ... Cockle rare
. Wing muscle well developed and spindle muscle arising from
!Wwostrong roots... L. _ G. schuettet (p. 25)
Wing muscle aot well developed and spindle muscle not
arising from twa strong roots , ."G. pellucida (p. 26)
1-74 January, 1980
*Golfingia (Phascoloides) improyisa (Théel)
Phascolosoma improvisum Théel, 1905 pp. 82-83, pl.
5, figs. 51-58, pl. 12, figs, 177-182, pl. 14, figs.
202-3.
Golfingia improvisa Murina, 1958 pp. 1625-1628,
Stephen and Edmonds, 1972 p. 145; Cutler,
1973 p, 155; Murina,1977 pp, 184-6, figs, 122a-c.
Location of type: Not known to author; type
locality, West coast of Sweden.
Description; Théel's account reads, ‘“Total length
of largest specimen 15 mm. Proboscis about half of
the total length, or shorter. Trunk cylindrical,
slightly tapering anteriorly and behind. Tentacles
absent and replaced by some irregular, rounded
prominences on the oral disc. Skin hyaline and
provided with distinct papillae especially on the
posterior end of the trunk and on the proboscis. A
girdle of hooks always present. Twa ventral
retractors embracing the nerve cord with their roots,
and varying greatly in length. They are attached ta
the body-wall either at the middle of the trunk, or at
its anterior part or else considerably posteriorly.
Two free segmental organs. Intestinal spiral
composed of about 13 or more double turns and not
attached posteriorly. Body cavity never contains
eggs.”
Remarks: This species has also been reported
from New Zealand in the tube of a foraminiferan
(Edmonds, 1976). G. improvisa is closely related ta
G. minuta (Keferstein) and thought to be
synonymous with it by some workers (see under G,
minuia), Murina (1977 pp, 184-8) discusses the
question.
Australian record: Tasman Sea (39° 35'S, 153! 45’
E) ‘in shell of a foraminiferan” (Murina, 1972 pp.
300) at 3.970 m.
Distribution: (1) in Australia: Tasman Sea.
(2) elsewhere: Sweden, Greenland, cast coast of
New Jersey, U,S.A., France, British Isles, north-
west Pacifie, South Africa,
* Golfingia (Phascoloides) minuta (Keferstein)
Phascalasoma pinutint Keferstein, 1863: p, 40, pl.
3, figs 7-10, Théel, 1911 p. 32, pl, 3, figs 42-45,
pl. 4. figs 46-49.
Golfingia minura: Murina, 1957a pp. 994-995- 1956
pp, 1628-1634; 1977 pp. 186-188, fig. 123:
Cutler, 1973 pp. 155-159,
Location of type: Not known to author: specimen
from St. Vaast la Houge, Normandy. France,
Description: A small species, According to
Keferstein trunk about 6 mm long and introvert &
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCULA) rh
mm. Tentacles reduced to two leaf-like structures or
4-6 “lobular projections” (Cutler, 1973 p. 158).
Museulature thin and continuous, Four retractors
arising in posterior third of trunk (Cutler says *‘a
wide variety of locations’). Spindle muscle not fixed
posteriorly. Nephridia short, sac-like, !ree and
opening a little behind anus. Small caceum usually
present according to Cutler. Akesson (1958) says
that G. minuta is hermaphroditic.
Systematics: G, minute is very closely related to
G. improvisa. Cutler (1973 p. 158) thinks that they
are synonymous but Murina (1958 p, 1624: 1977 p.
186) considers them different.
Australian record: New South Wales. off Broken
Bay (33° 34°5 S, 152° 06°5 FE) (5) Murina, 1972 p.
400.
Distribubon: (1) in Ausiralia; off coast of New
South Wales,
(2) elsewhere: Artic Sea. North Sea, western-
north Atlantic, Mediterranean, off South Africa,
north-west Pacific, Chile, and Falkland Is.
*Golfingia (Phascoloides) pellucida (Keferstcin)
Phascolosoma pellucidum Keferstein, 1865 p. 433,
pl. 32, figs 26-27; Fischer, 1919a p. 281.
Golfingia pellucida; Fischer, 1950b p. 550; Cutler,
1973 pp. 159-162.
Location of type: Not known by author; specimen
from St. Thomas, Antilles, West Indies.
Description: According to Keferstein the body is
8-9 times as long as wide, and the introvert is a half
to three quarters as long as the body. Skin rhin and
transparent, often iridescent. with uniformly distri-
buted small, wart-like papillae which posteriorly are
pointed and yellow. Hooks few and irregularly
distributed between the papillae and folds of skin on
the anterior part of the introvert; they are seen only
with the aid of a microscope and are ()-032 mm high
and (1-044 mm long, Tentacles numerous and rather
long.
Musculature thin, continuous and without band-
ing. Two retractors arising in the middle third of the
trunk. Two large eyespots, Intestine of about 14
spirals, without a posteriorly fastened spindle
muscle, Three fasteners to the first spiral. Rectum
short. Contractile vessel not observed. Nephridia
short and free, Length of bady 32-45 mm, of
introvert 15-23,
Several specimens from St. Thomas, in coral at
depth of 2 feet.
Remarks: Judging from the records. of Keferstein
(1865), Selenka & de Man (1883 p. 32), Augener
(1903 p. 299). Fischer (1914 p. 8), Cutler (1973 p.
159) and Murina (1968 p, 421; 1977 p. 196), G.
pellucida is a variable species. Fischer (1919 ap. 281)
reported it from Cockburn Sound, Western
Australia, Unfortunately he gave no information
about the specimens, Recently I have examined twa
other specimens from Cockburn Sound and have
decided that, although closely related to G,
pellucida, they are different from it. I have referred
them to G, schuettet (Augener, 1903), a species
described from Sydney, New South Wales. Whether
G. schuetiei and G, pellucida are synonymous | am
not able to say.
Australian records: Cockburn Sound, W.A.
(Fischer, 1919a); Torres St., Q. (Selenka & de Man,
1883).
Distribution: Antilles, Costa Rica, Jamaica,
eastern coast of South America, Amboina, western
North Atlantic, Philippines, Singapore, Torres St..
Gulf of Mexico, Gulf of Siam.
Golfingia (Phascoloides) schuettei (Augener)
(Figs. 35, 44-45)
Phascolosoma schutiei Augener, 1903 pp. 335-337,
figs 17-18.
Golfingia schuettei: Murina, 1964a p, 238, fig, 12;
1971: 43, 1973 16; 1974 p. 235; 1977 pp. 191-2,
fig. 128; Stephen & Edmonds 1972 p. 1456, figs
18a and b.
Location of type: Not known; specimen from
Sydney, Australia (coll. by Dr. Schutte in
1876).
Description: Specimens light lo golden brown or
grey, usually long and sub-cylindrical. Trunk 33-
160 mm long (three are longer than 100 mm) and 5-
10 mm wide. Introvert Usually not well differenti-
ated from trunk, 10-25 mm long. Mouth surrounded
by numerous digitiform tentacles which are made to
look complexly afranged by radially projecting
extensions of the tissue from which the tentacles
arise, much as is shown in figs, 191-3 of Théel
(1905), Zone of brown to black, sharply pointed
hooks, lies posterior to tentacles. Hooks either
straight or curved slightly at tip and varying in size
and direction, Anterior hooks usually largest,
projecting almost at right angles to surface; posterior
ones smaller, often just piercing surface. Small
papilla-like swellings usually present near base of
cach hook. Field of hooks may be better developed
On ventral surface and in one specimen whale field
much reduced.
24 REC. 5. AUST, MUS, 18 (1):
FIG. 35, Golfingia
schuettei, (specimen from Port
Jackson, New South Wales),
Trunk papillae may be plumply conical, glabose
or short and cylindrical, the first two sometimes
arising from a narrowed base or stalk, Musculature
of body wal! continuous. Two strong cetractors,
separate for part or most of their length, arise in
middle or posterior half of trunk. Contractile vessel
prominent but without villi. Wing muscle strong
Spindle muscle arises anteriorly from two strong
roots attached to body wall on each side of just
anterior to anus. Roots, separate from wing muscle,
run under rectum and join near caecum to form
spindle muscle (much as in G. margaritacea
adelaidensis and G. herdmant), Spindle muscle free
posteriorly. Three to five fastening muscles. Fl,
arising on left side of nerve cord runs to posterior
oesophagus; F2, F3 and F4 (if present) connect with
penultimate intestinal spiral and F5 with rectum.
Nephridia two, usually tubular (sometimes swollen
anteriorly), long free and opening at about same
level as anus. Brain simple with two eyespots.
Gonads at base of retractors. Twenty to thirty
double intestinal spirals.
Systematic position: Tam naming the specimens as
G, schuettet (Augener) with some reservations,
chiefly because I have not been able to compare
them with the type specimen.
It is possible that the specimens, especially those
from Cockburn Sound, W.A., are the same species
1-74 January, 1980
as those from Cockburn Sound which Fischer (1919
p. 281) called G. pellucida (Keferstein, 1865). The
type locality of the latter species is in the Antilles but
Fischer (1919 p. 281) says that it is “circummiun-
dane”, Unfortunately Fischer gave no information
about his specimens. G. pellucida (especially long
specimens) have heen reported from Indonesia,
Malaysia and the Philippines several times, (1) by
Selenka & de Man (1883) from the Philippines,
Singapore (specimens with trunk 80 mm _ long,
introvert 45 mm and without hooks) and Terres St.
(hooks lacking) and (2) by Augener (1903) from
Amboina (specimens 70 mm long). Selenka says that
he was not able to find any real difference between
specimens from the Antilles and Rio de Janeiro and
from the Philippines etc, and gave all them all the
same name.
After comparison with specimens of G, pellucida
from the Western North Atlantic, which were
named and sent to me by Prof, E, Cutler, and some
from Curacao, collected by C. J. van der Horst
(Zool, Mus., Amsterdam) | am inclined to think that
the Australian specimens are different. They are
much larger, cylindrica! rather than flask shaped,
their tentacles are more complexly arranged, their
wing muscle is strong and the spindle muscle arises
either from a triangular flap or two strong roots.
Concerning size, Cutler (1973 p. 159) found that the
trunk of 834 specimens of G. pellucida fram the
Western North Atlantic was 3-25 mm Jong and 1-3
mm wide (most were 6-10 mm long). Murina (1968
p. 422; 1972 p. 302: 1977 p. 192) also reports small
specimens. For these reasons I am reluctant to Jump
my specimens with those from Curagao and the
North Atlantic. A translation of Keferstein’s
description of G. pellucida is given in this paper (see
p. 25)
Phascolosoma schuettei Augener, 1903 was
described from a single specimen collected at
“Sydney” by Dr. Schiitte in 1876. Augener says that
that the specimen was with some others obtained
from the Gottingen Museum, The type however, is
not in the Museum today and there is no recard that
it was ever lodged there. The length of the trunk is
about 70 mm and Augener figures its club-like
papillae and its introvert hooks. Its tentacular crown
consists of numerous, long, yellowish tentacles
which sutround the mouth in a single row. The
single-rowed nature of the arrangement is obscured
by the radially projecting folds of the tissue from
which the tentacles arise (=‘'Tentakelgrundes”’)
much as itis in Siphonosoma cumanense. The species
possesses two retractors which arise in the posterior
two-thirds of the trunk, three fasteners, 63 intestinal
spirals, a caecum and a spindle muscle not attached
posteriorly, There is no doubt that my Australian
4 REVISLON OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCULA] 7
specimen and Augener’s description closely corres-
pond and it is unfortunate that the type specimen
cannot be found for a comparison, The main
ditference seems to be in the number of fasteners.
Murina (1964a p. 238) records two specimens from
the Tasman Sea (37° 31°S, 163° 59°F) at 1330 mm
and one from the N-W Pacific at 5397 m and in
Murina (1973 pp. 69-70) several from the Peruvian-
Chilean Trench at depths of up to 7 000 m. The
specimens in my collection, however, were collected
from shallow water, twa from Port Jackson (=
Sydney Harbor).
The trunk of G, (Phascalaides) novaecealandiae
(Benham, 1904) may be lang (up to 310 mm) and is
sub-cylindrical; the species seems closely allied to G,
schuettel. The four specimens so far desctibed
however, all lack introvert hooks, Sluiter (1902 p.
35) considered that his G. subhamata, dredged from
two different localities in Indanésia, although closely
related to G. pellucida was different trom it
Recently 1 re-examined one of Sluiter’s original
Specimens, a small one which I found difficult to
work with, Whether G, subhamata and G, sehuettei
are the same T am unable to say.
G. schuettei differs from the other large Australian
golfingiids (G, margaritacea adelaidensis and G.
herdmani) in that it has only two retractors, while
they have four.
Previous Australian records: New South Wales
(Augener, 1903): Tasman Sea (Murina, 19644).
Distribution: (1) in Australia: Port Jackson
(N.8.W.); Cockburn Sound, Port Gregory and
Dampier Archipelago (W.A.); Tasman Sea.
(2) elsewhere: N.W. Pacific Ocean, Peruvian-
Chilean Trench.
Specimens examined: New South Wales—Port
Jackson (1) AMS W3019 “tinder rocks” and (1)
SAM E1171 (coll. P. Hutchings). Western Aus-
tralia—Cockburn Sound (north of Jervaise Grayne)
SAM 141/76, Cockatoo Is. (1) ‘under stones at low
tide” WAM 149/76; Dampier Archipelago (1) coll.
of WAM.
Subgenus Golfingiella Stephen
Golfingiella Stephen. 1964 p. 459; Stephen &
Edmonds, 1972 p. 118; Cutler & Murina, 1977 p.
180; Murina, 1977 p, 240,
Description: Introvert without hooks but with
tentacles or tentacular lobes. Two pairs of retractor
muscles. Spindle muscle attached posteriorly,
Nephridia single-lobed.
Type species: Phascolosoma procerum Mobius,
Remarks; I am following the lead of Cutler (1977
p. 141) in placing G, murinae murinae in this
subgenus. Cutler (1969 p. 214), however, says that 4
few rows of transparent hooks are present on the
introvert. It is difficult, therefore, to see haw the
species falls in Golfingiella, Murina (1977 p. 238),
with some justification. has placed G. mnrinae in
Mitosiphon. Perhaps the status of G. murinae
murinae (= unilobatae) and G. mutinae bilohatae
needs investigation, Cutler and Murina (1977 p. 181)
claim that, because its mouth lies outside the ring af
tentacles, the species should be transferred to
Fisherana (Phascolosomatidae),
*Golfingia (Golfingiella) murinae murinae Cutler
Golfingia murinae murinae Cutler 1969 p. 214 (as
amended by Cutler): 1973 p, 145; 1977 p, 141-2,
figs 4 and 5; Cutler and Murina, 1977 p, 181,
Location of type: U.S.N.M. no. 38247; type locality,
37° 13’N, 68° 40°W, dredged at 4 540 m,
Description: Trunk 1-5-13 mm long, Introvert
four ta six times length of trunk, with few rows of
transparent hoaks (same of which have an accessory
comb of spinelets at base), Large mammiform
papillae at posterior end of trunk. Four retractars
arising from posterior third of trunk. Nephridia free
and sae-shaped, Anus posterior to nephridiapores
Australian record: Cutler, 1977 p, 142.
Distribution: (1) in Australia: Tasman Sea (off
Port Macquarie, N.S.W.) (31° 27°S, 153° 33'E)
dredged at 4530 m (6) (Cutler, 1977 p, 142).
(2) elsewhere: “A deep water species (1 O00-
4750 m) in the north-western Atlantic and in the
north-western Pacific Ocean (3 950 m)" aceording
to Cutler, 1977, off Kenya (3950 m), east of
Seychelles (3 300m), N-W Philippine Trench
(1 000 m), Sunda Trench (2 810-2 990 m), south of
Bali (780 m), All these records from Cutler, 1977,
Subgenus Thysanocardia Fisher
Thysanocardia Fisher, 1950b p. 551; 1952 p. 400:
Stephen & Edmonds, 1972 p. 120; Cutler &
Murina, 1977 p, 181; Murina, 1977 p. 198.
Description: One pair of retractor muscles.
Contractile vessel with branched or unbranched
tubules. Nephridiopore usually opens in front of
anus, No introvert hooks.
Type species: Phascolasoma procerum Mébius,
1875.
Remarks: The position of G. cortaca (Keferstein)
in this subgenus is very uncertain because it
possesses introvert hooks. Fisher (1950 p. 551; 1952
p. 395) placed it in the subgenus Golfingia s.s,
28 REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18 (1); 1-74
40
Tore re eti ade HMMM ooh
\
TC eanretic py PION a:
January, 1980
FIGS. 36-43. Figs. 36-38, Golfingia herdmani; 36, anterior region dissected; 37, introvert hooks; 38, posterior region of trunk. Fig. 39,
Golfingia margaritacea adelaidensis; anterior region dissected. Fig. 40, Golfingia misakiana; 41, anterior region of introvert; 42,
introvert hooks: 43, papillae from trunk.
Keferstein’s fig. 23 and his description ‘‘Contractiler
Schlauch .. . , mit mehreren sehr langen, cylindris-
chen Aussackungen” indicates that long tubules are
present. In which case the position of the species in
Golfingia s.s. is also uncertain.
Specimens of neither of the two species reported
from Australia have seen by me. G. coriacea
possesses hooks, G. semperi does not.
*Golfingia (Thysanocardia) coriacea (Keferstein)
Phascolosoma coriaceum Keferstein, 1865 pp. 432-3,
pl. 32, figs. 23-4; Selenka and de Man, 1883 pp.
34-5, pl, 2, fig, 15, pl. 5, figs. 50-53.
Golfingia coriacea Fisher, 1950b p. 551; Cutler, 1973
pp. 160-161; Cutler and Murina, 1977 p. 181.
Location of type: not known specimen from St.
Thomas, West Indies.
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCULA) 29
Remarks: Murina’s single specimen from South
Australia is small, cream and pyriform, Trunk 7 mm
long and 5mm wide and introvert 3 mm Jong and
1-5 mm wide. Introvert hooks 0-1 mm tong. Two
retractor muscles present and “fluffy” polian
vesicles,
No specimens of this species are in the collection
of the South Australian Museum. The only ones
from St, Vincent Gulf in the Museum which are
small, possess two retractors, fluffy polian vesicles
and introvert hooks are those of Themiste fusca (see
p. 40). The latter is common.
Cutler (1973 p. 159) places G. coriacea in the
synonymy of G. pellucida (Keferstein) on the
grounds that Keferstein's specimen must have been
aberrant.
Australian record: South Australia, near Adelaide
(Murina, 1972 p, 298),
*Golfingia (Thysanocardia) semperi (Selenka and de
Man)
Phascolosoma semperi Selenka. and de Man, 1883 pp.
37-38, pl. 5, figs. 56-59,
Golfingia semperi Fisher, 1950b p. 551,
Location of type: 7; specimen
Philippines.
from Uhoy,
Description! Trunk 28 mm long and slim. Two
stout retractors. Tentacles filamentous but hooks
Jacking, Contractile vessel with numerous tubules.
Nephridia about half as long as trunk, free and
opening anterior to anus. Spindle muscle not fixed
posteriorly.
Remarks; No specimens seen by the author,
Although it has been reported several times the
species seems not to have been re-described,
Fisher’s 1921 account takes up only three lines.
Australian record; Cape Jaubert, Western Australia
(Fischer, 1921).
Distribution: (1) in Australia: Western Australia.
(2) elsewhere: Philippines, Red Sea, Zanzibar and
Fernanda Po.
Genus Phascolion Théel
Phascolion Théel, 1875 p, 13,
Edmonds, 1972 pp. 164-165,
Stephen and
Description: Specimens usually small, living in
empty shells of gastropods or scaphopods, in tubes
of annelids, in burrows in coral rock or in solitary
corals. Body usually spirally twisted and internal
organs asymmetrically arranged. Only one, usually
the right, nephridium present. Usually only one
gonad. Musculature of bady wall continuous.
Characteristic adhesive or holding papillac usually
present on surface of trunk,
Type species: Phascolion strombi (Montagu, 1804)
KEY TO AUSTRALIAN SPECIES GF PHASCOLION
i. Retractor single forall ormostofitslength =... ... 2
Retractors double for allor most of [heir leneth , = a
2. Retractor divided posteriorly near point of fixation into 3
short roots; caecum placed al a considerable distance [rom
anus (half-third of way from anterior end of trunk)
“P pacificwm (p, 32)
Retractor not divided posteriorly: caecum not reported
P, vollare (p, 29)
3. Some papillae on anterior surface of trunk near base ot
introvert With 2-4 poms P. cronullae n.s.p. (p, 30)
Papillae on trunk with single points. * FP. dentalicolien(p. 32)
Phascolion collare Selenka and de Man
(Fig. 52)
Phascolion collare Selenka and de Man, 1883 pp. 45-
46, pl. 6, figs. 71-74; Fischer, 1922 p. 12; Cutler.
1977 pp. 144-5.
Type locality: Philippines; location of type not
known to author,
Description; This description is based on two
complete and two incomplete specimens, One intact
specimen is spirally coiled but the other not.
Estimated length of coiled specimen 14 mm and
width 2:2 anteriorly: of other specimen 9 * 1-7 mm,
Anterior extremity of trunk of coiled animal formed
into a soft cap which is marked off from trunk by a
rim; it is not an aspidosiphonid shield because it is
not hardened and because introvert arises centrally
and not ventrally to it. No shield-like structure in
other specimen, Posterior region of introvert and
anterior trunk bears flask-shaped papillae. Much of
trunk carries numerous small hemispherical or
rounded holdfasts, capped with a brown-black,.
forked structure of variable size, those on outer
(dorsal?) side being largest, Single-pointed part of
forked structure usually directed anteriorly.
Introvert about three quarters as long as trunk,
bearing anteriorly numerous small, blinted hooks.
One long nephridium. [ntestine short and although
convoluted scems not to be coiled. Retractor single,
arising without bifurcation from posterior extremity
of trunk,
Systematic position: There is no doubt that these
specimens from Heterocyathus are a Phascolion. The
single nephridium, the presence of holdfasts on the
trunk and the absence of shields suppert this
conclusion, The shape of the pointed structure of the
holdfasts and the internal anatomy of the animal
correspond to those af Phascolion collare, a species
previously reported from shells. No three or five
0 REC. §, AUST. MUS, 18 (1)-
pronged structures like those described for P. tridens
Selenka & de Man are present in the Western
Australian specimens. The specimens are closely
related to P. robertsani Stephen & Robertson, 1952,
to P. pacificum Murina, 19574 and especially ta P,
ikedai Sato. 1930, reported from the coral
Stéephanacerls,
Distribution: (1) in Australia: north-west Aus-
tralia-
(2) elsewhere: Philippines (Pangola, Ubhoy,
Bohal) in shells of Stronthus, Cerithiun: and Turbo:
Zanzibar in Dentalium shells; Makassar St. (at 2 DOO
m) and Bali Sea (at 1951 m).
Specimens examined and localities; Western
Austraha—5 specimens in colitary coral, Heleracy-
athus sp. dredged at Norbill Bay, Dampier
Archipelago WAM 36-73; alsa 2 specimens from
Heterocyathus from Phillips Beach, Dampier
Archipelago. AMS W5497. One retained in S.A.
Museum (SAM E11&8).
Phascolion cronullae n.sp.
Location of type: Australian Museum, Sydney;
specimen in shell of Gazameda gunni (Reeves)
off Cronulla, New South Wales,
Description; Trunk spirally twisted, about 9-20
mm long and with maximum width 3-4-5 mm.
Introvert about as long as trunk and 1-5 mm wide.
Body wall of introvert and anterior trunk is thick;
that of part enclosed in Shell of molluse is thin.
transparent and often fragile, except posteriorly
Where it is thicker.
Anterior extremity of introvert slightly bulbous
and with small, scattered hooks 0-05-0-08 mm long.
Amernormost hooks are largest and straightest;
more posterior hooks shorter and more recurved.
Small papilla-like swelling present at hase of hooks,
Introvert and trunk covered with papillae varying
considerably in size and shape. Papillae on introvert
smallest, with height greater than width, and with
pointed and extended tips. Papillae on anterior
trunk largest, 0:10-0:35 mm tall and 0-05-0-15 mm
wide, some being urn-shaped and other more
bulbous. Most terminate in a single tip, making
papillae appear mamillate, but others, especially
most anterior, may possess 2, 3 or 4 fips or prongs,
then resembling to some extent the “four-armed
crass” shown for Phascolion convestirum by Sluiter
(1902: 32). Surface of trunk posterior to region with
pointed papillae covered with numerous. closely
packed, rather flat, pale coloured papillae, elliptical
in shape. Thin walled part of trunk bears prominent.
scattered holding or adhesive papillae about Q-1-0-2
1-74 January, 1980
mm tall and 0-15-0-25 mm wide, brown to dark red-
brown in colour and usually lying with their blunted
tips directed anteriorly. Between holding papillae
and over rest of posterior surface lie numerous flat,
pale, hemispherical to elliptical papillae.
Longitudinal musculature continuous. Two retrac-
tor muscles, one usually stronger than other, arise
separately at base of trunk. Alimentary canal
complexly loaped and eniled, with its oesophageal
section fixed to the thinner retractor. Intestinal
loops held in position by fixing muscles arising from
anterior and posterior body wall. Posterior section
ol intestine may be wound into a loose spiral, Rectal
caecum present and from nearby intestinal wall a
pair of fastening muscles run to body wall
(sometimes two strands may fuse before reaching
body wall), Contractile vessel, without villi, attached
to dorsal surface of oesophagus. No spindle muscle
posteriorly. A single nephridium, fixed for most of
its length.
Systematic position: These specimens resemble P.
convestitum Sluiter, 1902 in possessing some
anteriorly placed trunk papillae which possess 1-4
points. I have, however, compared them with
Sluiter’s type and consider them different. Sluiter’s
specimens, both labelled ‘types’, are pyriform and
bottle shaped and not coiled, and lack holdfast
papillae with horny rims. The four-armed cross-like
papillae are very numerous, more slender and
extended than on the Australian specimens. Sluiter
says that the nephridium of his species lies on the left
side of the animal while in the Cronullan specimens
it is clearly on the right. Sluiter does not mention the
presence of a caecum nor of two fasteners that
connect the rectum near the caecum and the body
wall.
The Australian specimens differ from P, strombt
(Montagu, 1804), in possessing anteriorly placed
trunk papillae with 1-4 points. No such papillae are
mentioned or illustrated by Théel (1905) where he
recleseribes the species, nor by Gerould (1913), nor
in specimens collected by me at Roscoff, France
(SAM F1183) nor in those dredged at 43° 03° N, 65°
30” Wand sent 1a me by Dr, FE. Cutler (Univ. of
Utica, U.S.A,),
P. cronullae differs from P, temporariae Edmonds,
1976 [rom New Zealand in the shape of the introvert
hooks and from P. tortum Edmonds, 1976. also from
New Zealand, in the nature and position of the
“ventral’’ retractor,
Commensal: am indebted to Miss E, Pope of the
Australian Museum, Sydney for the following
information. “A polychaete of the family Syllidae
was found in mast of the shells containing a
sipunculan. The polychaete seemed to be entwined
with the Phascolion with its head near a point at the
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCULA) 31
|
(
49 51
FIGS, 44-52. Figs. 44-45, Golfingia schuettei; 44, anterior region dissected (specimen from Cockburn Sound); 45, introvert hooks. Figs.
46-51, Phascolion cronullae; 46, entire specimen; 47, anterior region dissected; 48, introvert hooks; 49-50, papillae from anterior
trunk; 51, holdfasts from trunk. Fig. 52, Phascolion collare; hardened part of holdfast.
32 REC. $8. AUST. MUS. 18 (1);
base of the introvert of the sipunculan. Of 74
randomly selected shells, 10 (13-3%) contained
living molluscs, 46 (62%) contained Phascolion
worms and 18 (24%) were empty. Syllids were
present in 40 (87%) of the 46 tubes that contained
the Phascolion.” Dr, P. Hutchings of the Australian
Museum has identified the polychaete as Syllis
(Toposyllis) armillaris (Mueller).
Symbiotic associations between species of Phasco-
lion and a number of other animals, including the
syllid Langerhansia cornuta (Rathke) have been
previously reported (Stephen and Edmonds 1972 p.
342),
Distribution: Known only from the type locality,
*Phascolion dentalicolum Sato
Phascolosoma dentalicolum Sato, 1937 p, 165, pl. 4,
figs, 20-21, text figs. 10-14; Cutler, 1977 p, 145,
fig. 8.
Location of type: Saito Ho-on Kai Museum, Sendai,
Japan; type locality, Onagawa Bay, north-east
Honshu, at 23 m.
Description: Found in shells of Dentalium sp,
Introvert 15 mm, trunk 15 mm. Small spines or
hooks on introvert. Holding papillae on trunk low
and laterally compressed. Two retractors. Single
nephridium. Nephridiopore posterior to anus,
Rectal caecum present.
Australian record: Great Australian Bight (off
South Australia) 37° 28’ S, 138°55' Eat 1 360 m (18)
(Cutler, 1977). Specimens from small twisted
gastropod shells.
Distribution: (1) in Australia: off South Australia.
(2) elsewhere: North-east Honshu, Japan.
*Phascolion pacificum Murina
Phascolion pacificum Murina 1957b pp. 1777-1781,
figs. 2a, 2b, 3a-e; 1972 p. 306; Cutler, 1977 p.
146.
Location of type: Not known to author; type locality
Kurile-Kamchatka Trench at 6 156-6 860 m.
Description: Introvert with very small hooks.
Trunk thin, small and grey-yellow, Single
retractor with three roots. Caecum situated half
or third of way from anterior end of trunk.
Nephridia fastened to body wall for whole
length.
Australian record: Great Australian Bight (off
South Australia) 37° 28" S$, 138° 55° B at 1 320-
1 340 m (1) (Cutler, 1977 p. 146); specimen in
empty gastropod shell,
1-74 Junuary, 1980
Distribution; (1) in Australian: off South Aus-
tralia,
(2) elsewhere: North-west Pacific Ocean, Peru-
Chile Trench, Antarctica, Pacific and Indian
Oceans,
Genus Onchnesoma
Onchnesoma Koren and Danielssen, 1875 p, 133:
1877 p. 142; Selenka and de Man, 1883 p. 130.
Description; Small sipunculans, usually pear or
club-shaped, Introvert very long and without hooks
and spines. Anus lies on introvert, well forward near
mouth. Tentacles few or absent, Trunk covered with
papillae of varying size and shape. Longitudinal
musculature continuous, Single retractor arising
from posterior of trunk. One nephridium.
Type species; Onchnesoma steenstrypii Koren &
Danielssen, 1875.
*Onchnesoma steenstrupii Koren & Danielssen
(Fig. 8)
Onchnesoma steenstrupii Koren & Danielssen, 1875
p, 133; 1877 p. 142, pl. 15, figs 28-36; Théel,
1905 pp. 93-96, pl. 10, figs 151-152, pl, 11, figs
157-172, pl. 13, fig. 185; Cutler, 1973 pp. 164-
166.
Location of type: Not known to author; specimen
from Kristiansund, Norway.
Description: Cutler (1973 p. 164) says that the
worms have been aptly referred to as “a tiny football
on a string”, Trunk small, pyriform; length -0-2-5
mm, maximum 4 mm and width 0-8-1:3 mm (2 000
specimens sampled—Cutler, 1973). Introvert 5-10
times length of trunk, lacking tentacles and hooks.
Only one introvert retractor, Anus lies well forward
on introvert just posterior to mouth,
Remarks; The species is well known in the north
Atlantic. It is distinguished from Golfingia
irichocephala (Sluiter) by the position of its anus and
the presence of only one retractor and one
nephridium.
Australian record; New South Wales; off Broken
Bay (33° 34°58, 152° 06'5E) (7) Murina, 1972 pp.
164-166, 304-305.
Distribution: (1) in Australia: New South Wales.
(2) elsewhere: Iceland, Scandinavia, North Sea,
North Atlantic, South-West Africa and Mediterra-
nean,
Genus Themiste
Themiste Gray, 1828 p. 8, pl. 6, figs 4, 4a; Stephen,
1964 p. 458; Rice and Stephen, 1970 p. 66;
Stephen & Edmonds, 1972 p. 193.
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCULA) a3
Dendrostumum Grube & Oersted, 1858 p. 118;
Fisher, 1952 p. 404.
Dendrostoma Keferstein, 1865 p. 438; Selenka & de
Man, 1883 p, 83,
Description: Trunk usually pearshaped, some-
times elongate and slender; strangly contracted
specimens may be globose, Tentacles surround
mouth and branching; consisting of 4-8 stems which
divide and sub-divide to form pinnately or palmately
arranged tentacules. Hooks or spines may be present
on introvert, Longitudinal musculature continuous.
Retractor muscles two (rarely four). Spindle muscle
not attached posteriorly. Two or more (usually
three) fastening muscles to intestine, Two free
nephridia, Contractile vessel usually well developed
and bearing few to many villi which may be short or
very long. Nuchal organ prominent in some species.
Type species: Themisre hennahi Gray (= Dendros-
tomum peruvianum Collin).
Remarks: Specimens of this genus have been
collected along the coast of all the States of
Australia. T. lageniformis is found in coral, in
clumps of mussels and under stones, T. cymoadoceae
and T. dehamata are found in mud, in sand and in
the roots of marine angiosperms. T, hutoni, T. fusca
and T. variospinosa are often found in burrows in
caleareous rocks or in cracks.
All the known Australian species have contractile
vessels with numerous short villi. Specimens of T.
lageniformis, T. fusca, T. variospinosa, T, huttoni
and T. cymodoceae are usually pyriform, the last two
and especially T cymodoceae tending to be large
and stout. T. dehamata, however, is more slender
and elongate.
1 am considering as one species the large
specimens of T, dehamata collected in New South
Wales (amongst them the type) and some smaller
ones not uncommon in South Australia and
Victoria. I have found it difficult to separate them
other than on the basis of size, The relationship
between them resembles in some Ways that which
Fisher (1952 p. 418) found between T. dyscrita
(Fisher) and T. zostericola (Chamberlin). Eventually
the larger New South Wales and the smaller
southern forms may prove to be two species.
Subgenera of Themiste
On the basis of the number of retractor muscles
and the length of the contractile tubules or villi the
species of Themisre fall into three groups which I
propose be regarded as sub-genera,
1. Themiste (sensu stricto) n. subg.
Diagnosis: Two retractor muscles. Contractile
tubules or villi long and thread-like.
Type species: Themiste hennahi Gray.
Hooks or spines present
I. alutacea (Griibe) T. dyserita(Fishér)
T blanda (Selenka T, hennahi Gray
and de Man)
Hooks or spines absent
T_ hexadactyla (Sato) T_ lissa (Fisher)
T. petricola (Amor) T_ perimeces (Fisher)
T. pyroides (Chamberlin) T. schrnitti (Fisher)
T. rosacea (Amor) T. zostericola (Visher)
T. spinifera (Sluiter)
(hooks sometimes reported to be
lacking in T. aluracea).
2, Lagenopsis n, subg.
Diagnosis: Two retractor muscles, Contractile
tubules or villi short and finger-like.
Type species: Themiste lageniformis Baird.
Haoks or spines present
T. fusca (Edmonds)
T_ hutfont (Benham)
T. minor (Tkeda)
T_ variuspinasa n- sp,
Huoks of spines absent
T. cythodaceve (Edmonds)
T. dehamata | Resteyen)
T. elhiprica (Saw)
T_ fisheri (Amor)
T_ lageniforms (Baird)
T- fropicva (Salo)
T. robertsoni (Stephen
und Rohertsen)
(in T_ robertsoni the tubules are
deseribed us benig Yonly of
moderate lengrh and fairly
numerous"),
3, Stephensonum mm. subg.
Diagnosis; Four retractor muscles.
Type Dendrastomum
Stephen.
Hooks present
species! stephensoni
Hooks absent
T. pinnifalia (Keferstein) T. slephensoni (Stephen)
Remarks: In Themiste s.s. the contractile tubules
are usually few and in Lagenopsis they are numerous
to very numerous. All Themisre species reported
from Australia are members of the subgenus
Lagenopsis.
KEY TO SPECIES OF THEMISTE (LAGENUPSIS) KNOWN
FROM AUSTRALIA
1, Specimens with introvert hooks ..,... 2
Specimens without introvert hooks...,.--. . ..... 4
2. Hooks of almost uniform size..- _. — 5 P
Hooks of markedly different size, which are Very irregularly
directed ..,, . Themisté variaspinusa no sp. (p 42)
3. Hooks few and scattered; specimens usually small (trunk less
than 15 mm), body wall thin and sometimes nearly
transparent, retractors not staut, intestinal spiral rather
loosely wound Themiste fusca (p. 40)
Hooks many and prominent, extending uver most ol (he
introvert and even posterior to the anus; specimens may be
large and stout, body wall rhick. villi of contractile vessel
crowded, intestinal spiral usually tightly wound
Themiiste huttoni (p. 36)
4. Specimens slender, size medivim 1a very Jong: two dorsal
stems of tentacles usually longer than two ventral stems;
tentacles plumose and flecked at their tips, nuchal organ
usually prominent Themiste dehamata (p- 34)
34 REC. S. AUST. MUS, 18 (1):
1-74
January, 1980
FIGS. 53-54, Themiste dehamata, 53, retracted specimen from New South Wales (previously dissected), 54 specimen from Victoria.
Specimens stout rather than slender and pyriform or even
sub-globular in shape; stems of tentacles about equal
size ae)
5. Specimens small to medium in size; tips of tentacles not
pigmented; usually collected in clumps of mussels or in
coral): is 046 co. 4 SEE Themiste lageniformis (p. 41)
Specimens medium to large tn size; tips of tentacles
pigmented; usually collected in roors of marine angio-
sperms ..,. Themiste cymodoceae (p. 35)
Themiste (Lagenopsis) dehamata (Kesteven)
(Figs. 53-57)
Dendrostoma dehamatum Kesteven, 1903, pp, 69-
73, pl. 7, figs 1-6.
Dendrostomum dehamatum: Edmonds, 1956, p. 296,
pl. 1, fig 1.
Themiste dehamata: Stephen & Edmonds, 1972, p.
198.
Location of type: Australian Museum, Sydney;
specimen from Balmoral, Sydney Harbor, New
South Wales.
Re-examination of three specimens: This rede-
scription is based on three of Kesteven’s original
specimens from Balmoral, New South Wales (SAM
E1210) but not the type material.
Specimens very long and slender. According to
Kesteven (1903 p. 69) they were collected on the
beach ‘‘at a time when there had been much rain and
heavy storms”. One cannot then discard the
possibility that the unusual shape of the specimens is
the result of the changes which take place when
sipunculans are placed in hyposmotic solutions,
Fisher (1952 p. 17) reported that three specimens of
Themiste perimeces, washed up on the beach after a
storm, were “unnaturally lengthened’’.
Body sub-cylindrical, slender, curved almost into
a circle, tapering posteriorly and pointed. Trunk of
largest 170 mm long and 7 mm wide posteriorly, Off-
white to grey in colour with posterior region darker
and almost black in one specimen. Skin smooth but
marked into small rectangular areas by fine
intersecting lines. Small, flat to slightly elevated
papillae with small, white, centrally-placed glandu-
lar pores are present in the middle of the rectangular
areas. Posteriorly placed trunk papillae black in one
specimen,
Introvert, not well differentiated from trunk, with
maximum length estimated as 50 mm; grey to yellow
and without hooks. Tentacles plumose, flecked
purple brown and, according to Kesteven, arranged
“in four stems, two of two and two of three primary
branches. In some specimens, however, the division
between the branches extends right down to the
circumoral muscular ridge, in which case there are
eight branches’. The individual tentacules seem
arranged largely in a pinnate manner along the
extended oral grooves (Kesteven, 1903, pl. 6, fig 2).
Nuchal organ prominent.
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCULA) 35
Twa very long retractors, arising in posterior half
of trunk and separate for most of their length.
Anteriorly, however, they are rolled to form two
halves of a “tube” containing oesophagus. and
contractile vessel. Alimentary canal very long.
Oesophagus runs to or near to base of retractors,
where it is fastened, then loops up anteriorly and
cails into a very Jong intestine with spirals extending
into posterior third of trunk, Rectum very long and
carrying a caecum, Anus and nephridiopores at
about. same level, although in Kesteven’s fig. 1 the
anus is just anterior, Rectal membrane present but
not a5 prominent as that shown for T. fisheri (Amar,
1964, p, 4, fig, B),
There are three main fastening muscles and a
spindle muscle. Fl, arising. at or just posterior to
base of retractors (= mes’ and mes’! of Kesteven fig.
1), may be single or double; if double the roots may
anse at slightly different levels. Fl is attached to
oesophagus fear posterior extremity of contractile
vessel. F2. arising from left side of and near ta nerve
cord, runs to rectum near caccum, and usually
supplies a well-developed series of connectives to
posterior oesophagus near intestinal spirals (=spm'
of Kestevens fig. 1). F3, arising from right side of
nerve cord (more anteriorly than F2), runs to rectum
at about level of caecum (=spm”™ of Kesteyen’s fig.
1), Spindle muscle arising from rectum just posterior
to caecum, traverses whole length of intestinal spiral
but is not fixed posteriorly, Contractile vessel
prominent, bearing yery numerous, short villi (much
like thase of T, lagenifarms, T. cymodoceae and T
huttoni) clustered along its dorsal surface. Posterior
villi longer and forming short branches, Nephridia
slender, free and about one third as Jong as trunk.
Remarks on some smaller specimens; After
considerable deliberation | am referring a large
collection of smaller specimens of Themiste from
South Australia and Victoria to this species. They
differ from the Sydney specimens most notably in
size.
Trunk of largest 75 mm long but mostly 30-50 mm
long and width 3-4 mm. Colour light grey to pale
FIGS. 55-56. Themiste dehamata, tentacular crown of
two specimens; 5S from Victoria, 56 from Sauth
Australia,
pink but anterior region sometimes yellowish.
Mouth surrounded by four groups or stems of
branching tentacles, two larger stems being placed
dorsally between a prominent nuchal organ and two
smaller stems ventrally. Tentacules often dark
purple, arranged pinnately along stems but at
extremities of smaller branches more palmately.
Introvert without hooks. or spines and often not well
marked off from trunk,
Internally as for T. dehamata. Two points of
difference, however, sometimes noticed; (1) the
recta] membrane 1s much more prominent than in
the four specimens described above and (2) there are
some variations in the points of attachment of the
intestinal fasteners. Fl may consist of a membrane
or three roots of different lengths. F2 may connect
with upward loop of oesophagus more anteriorly and
an additional F2a may connect the posterior
ocsophagus and rectum, F3 seems invariable.
Spindle muscle as in Balmoral specimens. Spherical
eggs 0:15-0-18 mm in diameter in some specimens.
Systematic position; I have not been able to
distinguish satisfactorily between the larger speci-
mens of T. dehamata from New Sauth Wales and
the smaller specimens of Themiste from South
Australia, Victoria and Western Australia other
than on their size. Eventually some other worker
may be able io show that they are different, The
relation between the Jarge and small specimens is
much like that between T. zostericola and T, dyscrita
(Fisher, 1952 p, 418),
Themiste fisheri (Amor, 1964) from Argentina is
closely allied to T. dehamata. Amor (1964 p, 469)
considered that the tentacles of her specimens arose
from six stems. While this may be so I contend that
her fig. 3a could be interpreted to show the presence
of four primary stems, her (1 & 2), 3, 4, her (5 & 6).
The main differences between the two species are
that T, dehamata has a caecum while T. fisheri has
not, that Fl and F2 arise from different positions in
the two and that the spindle muscle of T. fisheri
seems to arise more anteriorly, None of these points
is very Significant taxonomically except for that of
the caecum. Previous Australian recard. New South
Wales (Kesteven, 1903)
Distribution; in Australia: New South Wales,
Victoria, South Australia and Western Australia,
Specimens examined and localities: New South
Wales—Balmoral, Sydney Harbor (4) SAM
E1210—part af Kesteven's collection. Victoria—
Western Port Bay (2) SAM E1211 and (1) SAM
E1212; Port Phillip Bay (4) SAM E1222, South
Australia—chiefly amongst the roots of the marine
angiosperms Amphibolis, Posidonia and Zostera”
Outer Harbor (7) SAM E1214 Aldinga reef (8) SAM
E1216 and SAM E1217; Proper Bay, Port Lincoln
3h REC § AUST. MUS. 18 (1);
(10) SAM Ei21&; Coffin Bay (Eyre Peninsula) (3)
SAM E1219; Cape Jervois (5) SAM 61221; Emu
Bay (Kanyarow Is.,) (6) SAM E1213, Sellick’s reef
‘in Toots. of Amphibolis" (S) SAM E1225 Western
Australisa—Cottesloe (3) SAM E1248,
Themiste (Lagenopsis) huttoni (Benham)
(Figs. 60-64)
Phascolosoma huttoni Benham, 1904, p. 307,
Dendrestomum huttoni: Edmonds, 1960, pp, 164-
16S. pl. 3, text figs, 5-6,
Themiste hunoni: Stephen & Edmonds, 1972, p. 204.
? Dendrostoma signifer (in part) Selenka & de Man,
1883, pp. 86-87; Augener. 1903, p, 337; Fischer,
1914, p, 11; Fischer, 1919a p. 282.
Location of type: Not known by author; specimen
from New Zealand.
Introduction; Selenka & de Man (1883, p. 87)
considered a specimen from Sydney, with back-
wardly directed hooks 0-2 mm long, to be ‘'an armed
variety of Dendrostama signifer’ (= T. lagenifor-
mis), The same term was used by Augener (1903, p.
37) for some specimens from New Zealand, by
Fischer (1914), p. 37) for some specimens from New
Zealand and by Fischer (1919a, p. 282) for
specimens from Albany, Western Australia. None of
these atithors discussed the taxonomic problem of
the presence or absence of introvert hooks, Awati &
Pradhan (1935, p. 10), however, in their account of
“D. stenifer’ from India state that feebly developed
hooks are found on the introvert of the younger
stages but that they ‘‘fall off” tn adults, This does nat
appear to be so far T lageniformis in Australia,
None of the specimens in my collection from
Yeppoon, Dunwich and Darwin possess books,
although they range from young to adult animals.
On the other hand all the armed specimens of
Themisre sent from New South Wales and Western
Australia (including some with a trunk 40 mm long
and others that contain eggs and consequently are
adu ts) are heavily armed. At present I take the view
that since all the specimens collected from any one
lovality are either armed or unarmed and not a
mikx_ure of the two they belong to closely related but
different species. If in the future specimens with and
withaut Hooks are collected from the same habitat
the Jecision would have to be reconsidered, Benham
(1904) possibly took this view (although he did not
expicilly state it) when he called the “armed
variety” from New Zealand a new species, D.
hutroni, Cutler (1973, p, 161) says, with justification,
that the hooks of some species of Galfingia may be
lost While it js possible and even likely that some or
all of the hooks may be lost from a specimen ot
1-74 Jariiary, L980
Themtiste for reasons coneerned with its environment
or method of callectian, my. observatons lead me to
the hypothesis that T. lageniformis is one species and
that the armed form is another.
The specimens of Themuiste from some localities
e.g, South Australia, are small and often almost
transparent and the jntrovert haoks few in number,
small, almost uniform in size and distributed over 4
small area of the introvert, Specimens from New
Zealand, Tasmama, Western Australia and New
South Wales are larger and more robust and the
introvert hooks more numerous and larger but,
while still almost uniform in size, they extend over
much of the introvert, even to a point posterior to
the anus. In another group of specimens from
Queensland the hooks are noticeably different;
some are very large and others almost rudimentary,
they are irregularly arranged and point in different
directions, For these reasons [ regard the armed
specimens of Themiste closely resembling the
unarmed T. lageniformis as falling into three groups
and, because any collection fram one locality
contains only one group and not two or more, |
consider each group on morphological grounds to be
a separate species. The specimens from New
Zealand, Tasmania, Western Australia and New
South Wales are T. hutoni (Benham), those from
South Australia are T. fusea (Edmonds) and those
with vartable spines are a new Species, T.
variospinosa.
Description: The following description ot T-
huttoni is based on specimens from New Zealand,
New South Wales, Queensland, Tasmania and
Western Australia.
(1) Trunk of New Zealand specimens 16-35 mm
long with maximum width about 6mm, grey in
colour, thick walled, smooth and pointed post-
criorly, Estimated length of invaginated introvert
about a quarter that of trunk. Dissected introvert
shows that tentacles arise froma number of stems
and that black, posteriorly directed hooks or spines
are present, Hooks almost uniform in shape and size
and their field does pot extend as far as the anal
aperture.
Two stout retractors arising from posterior half of
trunk and separate for most of their length.
Alimentary canal consisting of descending and
ascending oesophageal loops, a long intestinal spiral
and a rectum with a caecum. Contractile vessel
attached to anterior oesophagus and bearing very
numerous, short, finger-like villi, the most past-
eriorly placed of which often form short branches.
Fixing muscles Fl and F3 well developed but F2
usually reduced, Fl arises from body wall anterior ta
and left of point of attachment of left retractor and is
fastened to oesophagus just posterior to termination
oO
<
oa
Dee
ET SERS to ate a
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCULA) 37
57
FIG. 57. Themiste dehamata, anterior
region dissected (one of Kesteven’s
specimens), c, Caecum; cv, contrac-
tile vessel: f1-f3, fastening muscles; 1,
introvert; in, intestine: n, nephridia-
pore; o. oesophagus; rm, retractor
muscle: rme, rectal membrane: sm,
spindle muscle,
of contractile vessel. F3 attached to rectum near
rectal caecum. F2 represented by a number of
muscular threads arising from upward loop of
oesophagus which conyerge and join rectum near
caecum. Spindle muscle, arising anteriorly from
rectum, not attached posteriorly. Wing muscle
present. Two free tubular nephridia, opening just
posterior to anus. Two eyespots near brain and a
nuchal organ lying at dorsal extremity of introvert.
Papillae on body wall small, flat with a small white
pore centrally, Eggs spherical, 0:17-0-19 mm. in
diameter. Skin at posterior extremity traversed by
fine lines.
(2) Trunk of Western Australian specimens 10-
28 mm long and with maximum width 2-5-4-4 mm,
curved inwards on the ventral side and with
posterior extremity bluntly pointed. Tentacles as in
New Zealand specimens but pigmented at their
base. Introyert hooks dark brown to black, most
pointing posteriorly, The field of hooks in all seven
specimens. however. extends right round the
introvert and well posterior to the anus (something
very unusual in a sipunculan). Fl fixes oesophagus
to body wall at a point between base of retractors.
F2, F3, caecum, spindle muscle, nephridia and
eyespots like thase of New Zealand material.
(3) Specimens from New South Wales larger:
trunk 12-55 mm long and maximum width 7-11 mm.
Colour predominantly grey but with marked
yellowish tinge. Armed area of introvert large but
not extending posterior to anus as in specimens from
Western Australia. Fl arises between retractors just
to left of nerve cord. F2 not reduced, arising from
body wall anterior to base of left retractor and
running to posterior oesophagus: it may connect
with rectum near the caecum. F3 as in New Zealand
specimens. Hooks, diameter of base 0-15-0-25 mm
and length 0-15-0-22 mm.
Systematic position; This species differs from T.
lageniformis, T. cymodoceae and T, dehaniata in the
possession of introvert hooks. It differs from T,
fusca which is smaller and in which the bady wall is
thinner, the nuchal organ more prominent, and the
intestine shorter and more loosely wound. It differs
from T. variospinosa in which the introvert spines
vary very much in size, shape and orientation.
Previous Australian record: Sydney, New South
Wales (Selenka & de Man, 1883).
Distribution: (1) in Australia: New South Wales,
Tasmania, Western Australia and Queensland.
(2) elsewhere: New Zealand.
Specimens examined and localities: New Zealand
—Stewart Is., (2) SAM E1228; east of Otago (1)
trawled on ‘‘Tacaroa” SAM E1229. Tasmania—
Coles Beach, near Devonport (1) SAM E1234;
38 REC. 8, AUST. MUS. 18 (1):
Jacobs Boat Harbor (1) SAM E1235, Western
Australia—Trige Is., “in limestone reef (7)
SAM E1233 and (2) WAN 242/76; Cockburn Sound
(2) WAM 32/73, New South Wales—Coffs Harbor
(4) SAM E1236; Bottle and Glass Racks (2)
SAM E1237; Long Reef (1) SAM E1238. Queens-
land—Coloundra (6) “on exposed rocky shore”
SAM E1239,
Themiste (Lagenopsis) cymodoceae Edmonds
(Figs 58 and 63)
Dendrostoma cymodoceae Edmonds, 1956 pp. 297-
301, figs 15-16; Akesson, 1958, pp. 147-151 figs 46-
67 and 219-222.
Themiste cvmodoceae Stephen and Edmands, 1972,
pp. 197-198. fig, 102,
Location of type: Australian Museum, Sydney;
specimen from Aldinga Reef, South Australia,
amongst roots of the marine angiosperm Amphibolis
(= Cymodocea) antaretica.
Description: Adults large, robust and elongate to
pyriform in shape; trunk 50-90 mm long with
maximum width of 15-25 mm posteriorly, Colour
light to dark grey with tendency to yellow brown
anteriorly; posterior region usually darker. [Introvert
cylindrical, relatively short, about 5-8 mm_ in
diameter and lacking hooks and spines. Surface. of
introvert just posterior to tentacles smooth, pale and
shiny or sometimes purplish and glossy. A light
brown or yellow band often surrounds introvert near
its middle or towards base. Trunk of fixed specimens
tends to curve inwards slightly on ventral side, Body
wall smooth, although covered with numerous flat,
white papillae, 0-04-0-08 mm in diameter, each of
which bears a white glandular opening at its centre.
Body wall thick, especially posteriorly. Longitudinal
and circular musculature continuous but internal
coelomic wall traversed by oblique muscle striations.
Tentacles arising from four primary stems any of
which may subdivide so that tentacles sometimes
appear to be in 4-8 stems. Subsequent division or
redivision of stems gives rise to small, finger-like,
straw to purple-brown pinnately arranged ten-
tacules. Tip of tentacules always darker than
remainder. Tentacles (= stems and tentacules),
relative to length of trunk seem smaller than those of
T. lageniformis and are more bushy.
Internal anatomy resembling that of T. lagenifor-
mis. Two long, stout retractors fixed in posterior
third of trunk. Oesophagus thin-walled, running
between retractors as far as their base and then
looping sharply upwards to a point near rectum;
intestine Jong and spirally coiled. Rectum short and
carrying a caecum. System of intestinal fasteners
variable. Oesophagus always fastened near base of
4-74 January, 1980
OT
=
=
MaTRICY
FIG. 58. Themiste cymodoceaé, (specimen from Aldinga
Bay, South Australia).
retractors by 1-4 short threads (F1), usually arising
between bases of retractors on left side of nerve
cord, F2, arising near left retractor and connecting
with upward loop of oesophagus near the first spiral,
may Or may not be present, F2 may bifurcate or an
additional fastener (F2a), arising close to F2, may
also connect with oesophagus, In a few specimens F2
may connect solely or in part with Jast or
penultimate intestinal spiral. F3, present in all
specimens, is shorter and stouter than F2, arises an
right side of nerve cord in anterior half of trunk and
connects with last intestinal spiral or rectum where,
latter joins the intestine. Spindle. muscle strong,
arising anteriorly from beneath a rectal membrane,
but not attached posteriorly. Contractile vessel
attached to oesophagus as far as base of retractors
and bearing very numerous short sometimes
branching villi, which are larger and very densely
clustered posteriorly. Nephridia thin, brown in
colour, free, about one third as long as trunk and
opening at about level of anus or usually just
posterior to it. Gonads at base of retractors. Nuchal
organ not as prominent as in T, dehamata.
Systematic position: T. cymodoceae is closely
related to T. lageniformis, Although in 1956 I
admitted that the two might be extreme varieties of
the same species J now consider them different, T,
cymodoceae grows to a larger size, its tentacles are
more bushy and plumose and are pigmented at their
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCULA)
FIG. 59 Themiste fusca, (specimen from South FIG. 60. Themiste huttoni, (specimen from Long Reef,
Australia). New South Wales).
FIG. 61. Themiste lageniformis, (specimen from Curtis FIG. 62. Themiste variospinosa, (specimen from Queensland).
Is., Queensland).
AO. REC, §. AUST, MUS, L8 (1):
tips and there is usually greater variation in the
arrangement of its intestinal fasteners. There is,
however, little difference in the internal anatomy of
the two species. At Aldinga reef, St. Vincent Gulf,
South Australia, the type locality, T. cymodaceae
lives amongst the tangled roots of Amphibolis
(= Cymodacea) antarctica and the sand and debris
contained in them. It lives in a cavity which is
formed as the animal grows in the roots. It seems ta
he almost sedentary; it scarcely moves and shows
little inclination to burrow when it is placed on sand
in an aquarium. Amphibolis normally lives below the
level of inter-tidal reefs. Patches af it occur,
however, on the outer edges of reefs which are well
washed by waves and where there are tidal runs and
drains. J have not found the species in burrows in
rocks. Themiste fusea, however, occurs in burrows
on the same reef at a higher level near the shore.
Although [ have collected about 400 specimens of T,
cymodoceae at this locality | have not found any
which earry introvert hooks, The specimens of T.
lageniformis which T have identified from Australia
have been associated with mussel clumps or coral
rock,
The relation between T, cymodoceae and T.
lageniformis is very much like that between T.
zostericala and T. dyserita as described by Fisher
(1952 p. 418),
Akesson (1958) made a careful study of the
nervous system of T. cymodoceae and Edmonds
(1957a & 1957b) studied its respiration and
excretion. It is a good experimental animal in that it
is very hardy: it Seems reluctant. however, to feed in
the laboratory. Previous Australian record: South
Australian (Edmonds, 1956).
Distribution; Known only from the shores ot St.
Vincent Gulf, South Australia.
Specimens examined and localities: South Aus-
trittia—Aldinga reef (just north of Sellicks Beach),
St. Vincent Gulf, “among roots of the marine
angiosperm Amphibolis (= Cymodacea) anrarctica
(Labill,) Sonders & Ascherson”’, about 50 specimens
comprising SAM E1191, E1193: Cape Jervis (2)
SAM E1104.
Themiste (Lagevopsis) fusca (Edmonds)
(Figs. 59, 65-67)
Dendrostomum fuscum Edmonds, 1960, pp. 145-1067,
hes 7-9, pl. 3.
Themiste fusca: Stephen & Edmonds, 1972, pp. 200-
201,
Lovation of type: Australian Museum, Sydney;
specimen from Proper Bay, near Port Lincoln,
South Australia, Specimens burrowing in a
calcareous, intertidal reef,
1-74 Janhary, T98T
Description; Specimens usually small, Trunk
rarely as Jong as 20 mm and usually less than 15 mm;
white, cream or light brown in colour. Body wall
thin and sometimes. semi-transparent. Introvert
short, Tentacles white and branching, sometimes
flecked with brown and arising from four primary
stems, Introvert hooks black, blunt, posteriorly
directed, 0:05-0:10 mm long, few in number and
scattered. Numerous very small, circular, pale
coloured papillae, Jargest ancl most prominent at
base of introvert and on posterior trunk. Skin
usually smooth but sometimes furrowed into small
square or rectangular areas.
Two slender retractors arising in posterior region
of trunk. Oesophagus fastened to body wall at base
of retractors, then looping anteriorly as in T-
lageniformis and T. hurtoni. Contractile yessel with
fewer and simpler (less branched) villi. Intestinal
spiral Joosely and sometimes irregularly wound
consisting of 6-10 double spirals, Rectal caecum
small, Spindle muscle arising anteriorly fron rectum
but not fixed posteriorly. Two nephridia short, free
and with external openings just posterior to anus.
Reetal membrane present. Fastening muscle FI
cannects base of oesophageal loop ta body wall at
point bear base of left retractor and F3 holds last
spiral of intestine. F2 may be complete, reduced or
absent; if complete, it holds. posterior oesophagus
and if reduced it joins only the posterior oesophagus
and posterior intestinal spiral and not the body wall.
Gonads at base of retractors. Two eyespots, Nuchal
organ present,
Systematic position: This Species is closed allied to
T. huttoni (Benham) and T. minor (Ikeda), the latler
from Japan, It differs from T, hunoriin thatin fusca
(1) the specimens are smaller (2) the body wall is
much thinner and often nearly transparent (3) the
hooks are smaller, fewer in number and more
scattered in their distribution (4) the retractors are
weaker (5) the villi are fewer (6) the intestinal cai) is
shorter and more loosely wound and (7) the nuchal
organ is more prominent.
The smallest specimens are not easily disting-
uished externally from some of T. minor (Ikeda)
kindly sent to me from Matsuyami, Japan by Dr. O.
Ochi (Ehime University), The Japanese specimens,
however, ate smaller, their system of fastening
muscles and their contractile vessel seem simpler.
Both T. cymadoceae and T. fusca are found at
Aldinga and Sellicks Reefs, South Australia, the
former amongst the roots of the angiosperm
Amphibolis on the lowest levels of the reef and
subtidally, and the latter in burrows in the
calcareous rack at higher levels near the shore_
Previous Australian records: South Australia
(Edmonds, 1960).
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCULA) 41
Distribution: (1) in Australia: South Australia.
(2) elsewhere: New Zealand.
Specimens examined and localities: South Aus-
tralia—Point Wittelbee, Eyre Peninsula (15)
SAM E1240; Coffin Bay (16) “in calcareous reef
between tide levels’** SAM E1241; Kellidie Bay
(near Coffin Bay) (7) “in limestone reef”; Port
Willunga and Aldinga (both south of Adelaide) (30)
SAM E1243; Encounter Bay (in limestone reef in
front of Yilkie Post Office) (20) SAM E1249; Proper
Bay, near Port Lincoln “burrowing in limestone reef
exposed at mid-tides’’ (8) SAM E1242.
a orl
_ ~sS
Themiste (Lagenopsis) lageniformis Baird
(Figs 61, 70)
Themiste lageniformis Baird, 1868, pp. 98-99, pl. 10,
fig. 3; Rice and Stephen, 1970, pp. 66-67, pl. 3,
figs 12-13; Stephen & Edmonds, 1972, p. 205.
Dendrostoma signifer Selenka & de Man, 1883, pp.
86-87, pl. ti, pl. 11, figs 163-164.
Dendrostomum signifer: Edmonds, 1956, p. 297, pl.
1, fig, 2.
Location of type: British Museum (Nat. Hist.,
London); specimen from Australia.
Wl LJ V/
7 |
ts per S.
Sy
i
es
%
Suen
paula Maps
pages
c
ee
aed
BaP wae
Sr re
Seep ett ie,
FIGS. 63-70. Fig. 63, Themiste cymodoceae; dissected specimen. Fig. 64, Themiste huttoni; introvert hooks, Figs. 65-67, Themiste fusca;
65, introvert hooks: 66, papillae on trunk (figs. 65 & 66 to same sale); 67, dissected specimen. Figs. 68-69. Themiste variospinosa;
68, introvert hooks; 69. dissected specimen, Fig, 70, Themtiste lageniformis; branching contractile villi.
42 REC. §. AUST. MUS, 18 (1);
Description: Size and shape of specimens
depending largely on whether or not they had been
relaxed before fixation, Contracted specimens stant.
pear-shaped or sub-spherical, relaxed ones longer
and less stout. Trunk 5-33 mm long with maximum
width in posterior thicd, Besh-coloured, light to dark
grey or light to dark brown, Most tend to curye
inwards on ventral side, Body wall appearing
smooth although smalj, white, flat glandular pores
present. Surface of unrelaxed specimens often
divided into small rectangular areas by fine lines or
ridges, Posterior extremity rounded or pointed,
Introvert shart, 3-10 mm Jong, often darker in
colour than trunk and often ringed anteriorly with a
dark blue to black band. Tentacles white and not
pigmented or flecked like those of T. dehamata and
T. cymadoceae; arising from 4 primary stems any
one of which may divide into two.or more stems, the
latter branching in turn to form tentacules,
Consequently, if subdivision is near base of primary
stem, number of stems may appear ta be 5-8.
Tentacules finger-like and relative ta body length
longer than those of T, dehamata and T.
cymodoceae, Four primary stems form prooves along
which food moves to mouth, Region of introvert just
posterior to tentacles forming a smooth collar; a
pigmented ring, if present, lying posterior to collar.
All specimens hsted below without introvert hoaks,
although collected at different times by different
people.
Two very Stout retractor muscles arising in
posterior third of trunk. QOesophagus runs to base of
retractars Where it is held in position by a short,
sometimes double, fastener (Fl) and then loops
anteriorly. Intestinal coil a well developed spiral;
rectum short and carrying a caecum, In most
specimens a second fastener (F2), arising near point
of attachment of left retractor, is fixed to
oesophagus near first intestinal spiral. F3, arising
near right retractor, fixed to last or second to Jast
spiral. Stout spindle muscle, arising anteriorly from
beneath a rectal membrane, not fixed posteriorly. A
tubular contractile vesse] with numerous. finger-like
villi extending along the oesophagus to base of
retractors: villi may form short branches near base of
retractors but rarely extend a long upward loop of
oesophagus. Two free, tubular nephridia, about one
third as long as trunk, opening near anus or just
posterior to it, Gonads at base of retractors;
spherical eggs with diameter 0-18-0-20 mm. Nuchal
organ not as prominent or as noticeable as in T,
dehamata and T_ cymodoeceae Brain with two
eyespots.
Systematic position: T. lageniformtis, probably
better known as JT. signifer, isa simall to medium
sized species, pytifarm to sub-globose in shape and
L-74 Jankary, Ls
often curved inwards on its ventral side. It lacks
hooks and its tentacles are not pigmented at their
tips, The body wall is usually stout and thick, A dark
blue-black band may ring the introvert anteriorly,
Previous Australian records: Queensland
(Edmonds, 1956), Cape Yark (Selenka & de Man,
1883). “Varieties” with hooks reported from Sydney
(Selenka & de Man, 1883), from Tasmania (Fischer,
1914) and Albany, Western Australia (Fischer,
1926) are being referred to other species, Baird's
1868 record is from ‘Australia’.
Distribution: (1) in Australia: Queensland,
Northern Territory and Western Australia.
(2) elsewhere: widely in the Indo-Pacific Regian;
West Africa, South Africa, Madagascar, India, Gulf
of Manaar, Amboina, Japan, Philippines, New
Zealand and Hawaii (SAM E1197).
Specimens examined and localities; Queensland
—Dunwich (20) ‘in clumps of mussels, in front of
the cemetry’ SAM E1196 and (12) SAM E1207;
Myora (10) SAM E1200; Cape Cleveland (2) SAM
E1201; Cardwell (1) SAM E1202; Geoffrey Bay,
Magnetic Is. (6) SAM E1203; Wellington Pt.,
Moreton Bay (8) SAM E1205; Wistari Reef,
Capricorn Group (2) call, of Prof. W. Stephenson;
Yeppoon (5) coll. of Prof, R, Kenny; Rat, Is., near
Pt Curtis (7) AMS W2760. Northern Territory
—Lee Point, near Darwin “in coral” (4) SAM E1208
and (4) SAM E1209. Western Australia—Broome
(8) coll, from Hamburg Museum,
Themiste (Lagenopsis) variospinosa n-sp.
(Figs. 62, 68, 69)
Location of type: Australian Museum, Sydney;
specimen from “coral clumps", St. Helena Is.,
Moreton Bay, Queensland.
Description: This species is distinguished from T,
huitoni, which it closely resembles, by the spination
of its intravert hoaks.
Trunk 9-27 mm long and maximum width 4-7 mm
in posterior third, with posterior extremity bluntly
pointed and with surface smaoth, grey in some and
pinkish brown in others, Small flat, circular papillae,
with a very small clear or white pore at centre,
almost uniformly distributed over surface, Tentacles
branching and arising fram 4-5 stems (shown in two
well-relaxed specimens). Nuchal organ present
between two stems of tentacles on dorsal side,
Introvert hooks sharp and black; those most
anteriorly placed largest, 0-15-0-30 mm long, with
most points directed posteriorly, Hooks most
posteriorly placed smallest, 0:02 mm long, with rips
directed anteriorly, posteriorly or at mght angles ta
surface (hence name variospinosa).
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPLINCULA) 43
Internal anatomy much like that of T. hutioni.
Two strong retractors, arising in posterior half of
trunk, Alimentary canal consisting of downward and
upward loops of oesophagus, a spirally coiled
intestine and rectum, Contractile vessel attached to
downward loop of oesophagus and bearing villi not
as densely packed as in T. hutioni, Posteriorly placed
villi forming short. branches and extremities of villi
sometimes expanded into a small knob. Fastening
muscle F1 arising to left of base of left retractor (as.it
does sometimes in T. huttoni) and connecting with
oesophagus just posterior to extremity of the
contractile vessel, F2 arising more anteriorly than Fl
and connecting with posterior oesophagus and
rectum. F3 short and strong. Spindle muscle nat
fixed posteriorly, Rectal caecum present. Nephridia
twa, free, tubular and arising just posterior to anus,
Systematic position: In the retracted state these
specimens look very much like a Golfingia. Some
expanded specimens, however, show that the
tentacles arise from at least four stems each of which
divides and subdivides to form tentacules. The
species is closely related to T. huttaniand T, fusea. It
differs from both in the nature and arrangement of
its introvert hooks.
No previous Australian record,
Distribution: in Australia; only from the type
locality (St. Helena Is., Moreton Bay).
Specimens examined and localities: Queens-
land—St. Helena Is., Moreton Bay “in coral
clumps” SAM E1245 and same locality (5) SAM
E1246.
Family Aspidosiphonidae and key ta genera
Aspidosiphanidae Baird, 1868, p. 100: Stephen
and Edmonds, 1972. pp. 215-216
Description: Rather small sipunculans with either
a hardened, boroy, usually brown shield or a white.
caleareous cap clearly marked off on anterior region
of trunk, A caudal shield may be present at posterior
extremity of trunk. Introvert lies ventral to shield or
cap in all genera, except Cloeasiphon, where it arises
from centre of cap, Longitudinal musculature
continuous or in bundles, the latter sometimes
anastamosing considerably. Two nephridia.
Type genus: Aspidosiphon Diesing. 1851.
KEY TQ GENERA OF ASPIDOS([PHONIDAE KNOWN
FROM AUSTRALIA
1, Amerior (anal) shield or cap present and posterinr (caudal)
shield as Well 20... oe, pisses Pate pt annaee
Anterior (anal) shield or cap present but no posterior
(calidal) shield-- -.... -.... een, 8
2. Longitudinal musculature of trunk wall forming bundles-
which may anastomose considerably
Paraspidosiphon (p. 49)
Longitudinal musculature of trunk wall continuans
Aspidosiphan (p. 43)
3. Longitudmal musculature of trunk wall continuous (anterior
tap rounded, caleareous and pineapple-like). Introvert
from middle of cap ---,.,,,,. -. , - Cloeosiphon (p. 54)
Longitudinal musculature of trunk wall forms bundles, which
thay anastomose. Anlerior cop has shape of # truncated
cone. Introvert arising ventral ro cap Lithacrosiphon (p, 54)
Remarks; Stephen (1964, p. 457) split off from
Aspidosiphon a new genus, Paraspidosiphon, in
which the longitudinal muscles are grouped into
bundles, sometimes with much anastomosation.
Stephen regarded the condition of the longitudinal
muscles of considerable taxonomic importance in
the phylum. Stephen and Edmonds (1972) followed
Stephen's lead. Neither Cutler (1973, p. 173) nor
Murina (1975b, p. 1748, 1752), however, considers
that Paraspidosiphon is justified at the generic level,
each preferring to regard. Aspidosiphon as consisting
of two subgenera. Aspidosiphon (sensu stricta) and
Paraspidosiphon,
Centrosiphon (Shipley, 1903), which Stephen and
Edmonds (1972) included in this family, is being
omitted because it now seems to me that C.
herdmani, the type of the genus, is a galfingiid, The
taxonomic position of the species 1s, however, still
uncertain.
The tentacular arrangement in Aspidosiphon and
Paraspidosiphon as stated by Stephen and Edmonds
(1972, p, 217) is naw known to be wrong, Gibbs
(1977) pointing out that the tentacles lie in a near
ring dorsal to the mouth, as in Phascalosoma (see
remarks on p. 8), | am not certain how the tentacles
are arranged in Cloeosiphon and Lithacrosiphon,
Genus Aspidosiphon Diesing
Aspidesiphon Diesing, 1851, p. 67 (in part)s
Stephen, 1964, p. 457,
Description: Anal and caudal shields usually
prominent and longitudinal muscles of body wall
continuous and not separated into bundles, Anal
shield may be circular, elliptical or horseshoe
shaped, darker in colour than the trunk, with its
surface sometimes furrowed, groaved or covered
with hard, irregolarly arranged granules. Caudal
shield may be flat, hemispherical, conical or
truncate; it may or may not be furrowed or grooved.
Sometimes the caudal shield is not strongly
developed, Introvert arises from the yentral side of
the anterior shield, Tentacles digitiform and
arranged in a horseshoe-shaped ring dorsal to mouth
(see foot-note on p. 8). One or two retractors. Two
nephridia. Contractile vessel simple-
Type species: Aspidesiphon muelleri Diesing,
1851.
44 REC. 8. AUST, MUS, 18 (1):
KEY TO SPECIES OF ASPIDOSIPHON FOUND IN
AUSTRALIA
1. Introvert hooks—all with single points ., Be
Introvert hooks—some or all with two points tevernrt ned
2. Hooks with long, bent points . TA. ealrigustus Cp: 4b)
Hooks without long, bent points - a Le ay ee.
3. A number of knobby papillae on anterior pate of anal shield
modified io form spine-like structure , A. inquilinus(p 47)
No spine-like structures on anal shield; tendency forcircular
musculature of body wall to be striated . A, gracilis(p, 46)
4, Surtace of anterior shield furrowed ar nbbed --- 0 ..,,..,,5
Surface of anterior shield not furrowed
A. elegans elegans (p. 44)
. Anterior shield with about 12 furrows, posterior Shield with
wenker striations (well known inhabitant of solitary
corals) —. ‘ _ A. Jukesin(p. 49)
Antenor shield with: 5.6 inrzasws, posterior shield with 24-
2b TEE OCEETE Pio hem ae iat A. harmeyeri (p. 47)
tA
A. elegans elegans and A- gracilis inhabit coral
reefs and A, hartmeyeri limestone reefs. A. Jukesit
lives in the solitary coral Heteropsammia and A,
inquilinus inhabits the shells of Dentalium and other
molluscs,
Aspidosiphon elegans elegans (Chamissa and
Eysenhardt)
(Figs. 71-76)
Sternapsis elegans Chamissa and Eysenhardt, 1821,
p. 351 pl. 24, figs. 5a-e.
Aspidosiphon elegans Griibe 1868a, pp. 645-647, pl.
8, fig. 5-Sa-b; Selenka and de Man, 1883, pp.
124-6, pl. 1. figs. 10-10a, pl, 14, figs. 205-208;
Sato, 1935, p. 316; Sato, 1939, p. 426-7
Aspidosiphon exilis Sluiter, 1886, p, 497, pl. 3, figs.
11-12.
Location of type: Not known to author; type
locality, “small islands of the Pacific Ocean”.
Description; Slender, delicate, pale to straw
coloured and coral dwelling. Trunk more or less
cylindrical, 8-14 mm long and 1:7-2:8 mm wide, thin
walled and fragile and sometimes slightly curved so
that ventral is slightly shorter than dorsal side.
Longitudinal musculature continuous,
Anal shield prominent, elliptical, dark brown
(although golden around edges) and usually warty,
consists of brown polygonal plates placed closely
together and usually lacking furrows (although edges
may be ridged to some extent), Caudal shield more
weakly developed and sometimes almosi insignific-
ant, usually hemispherical with chitinous structures
around its periphery; furrows, if present are only
marginal.
Papillae on trunk flat and usually restricted to (1)
a narrow region just pasterior to anal shield and (2)
a narrow region at posterior of trunk, consisting of
1-74 January, 1980
ageregates of flat polygonal plates grouped around a
small circular opening. Caudal shield of sorne
specimens consists of structures resembling closely
set papillae.
Introvert of fixed specimens about as long as or a
little longer than trunk. slender, thin walled, arising
ventrally to anal shield and bearing anteriorly a few
tentacular-like structures; armed with 15-30 rows of
small dark hooks with two points, Clear area inside
hook usually possesses a small, backwardly directed
tongue or extension (slight variations of the angle at
which the hagk lies on a shde can cause considerable
differences in its appearance), Hooks in most
posterior rows of some specimens are smaller and
lack internal markings—whether they are develop-
ing hooks or not is not known.
Dark, single pointed, closely set spines of varying
size and shape he on introvert posterior ta haaks.
their field extending to its base; spines (1) are larger
and more closely set an dorsal surface of introveri
and (2) beconie larger the more posteriorly they are
placed. In same specimens, where spination is
heavy, spines arise from strang bases or rooting
Processes and clearly possess a central, tubular
canal,
Retractor muscle, arising [rom body wall well in
front of caudal shield, consists of two short roots,
Intestine loosely wound and frail. Rectum long and
lacking a caecum. No intestinal fasteners observed,
Two thin and delicate nephridia, about half as long
as trunk, are fixed to body wall for most of their
length, Spindle muscle fixed posteriorly.
Systematics and discussion; There is a group of
aspidosiphonids in which the longitudinal muscula-
ture is continuaus, which possess introvert hooks
with two points, well developed introvert spines wilh
Single points (often with strong rooting processes)
and which bear small truncated papillae on the
introvert. They possess few or no papillae on the
trunk except near the anal and caudal shields and the
papillae are flat and consist of polygonal plates.
They possess a single retractor muscle that arises
from two roots which are fastened to the body wall
well anterior to the caudal shield, Their nephridia
are about half as Jong as the trunk and are fixed to
the body wall for most of their length. Some of these
species are Aspidosiphon spinalis Ikeda, 1904 (from
Japan and Jaluit {s.), A. spinosus Sluiter, 1902 (fram
Indonesia), A, homoniyarius Johnson, 1964 (from
west coast of India), A. exilis Sluiter, 1886 (from
Indonesia), A. carolinus Sato, 1935 (from West
Caroline Ts,), A. hrocki Augener, 1903 (fram
Malaya), A. elegans elegans (Chamisso and
Eysenhardt, 1821 (from Pacific ls., Philippines and
the red Sea) and A. elegans yapensis Sato, 1935
(from West Caroline Is.).
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCULA) 45
—\ Ui
~y \ Wy 8
88 WWF 86
FIGS. 71-88, Figs. 71-79, Aspidosiphon elegans; 71, dissected specimen; 72, introvert; 73, introvert hooks (from posterior region); 74-
75, introvert hooks with two points; 76, hook from Aspidosiphon exilis Sluiter; 77, spines from introvert; 78, larger spine from
posterior region of introvert; 79, papilla fron anterior region of trunk (Figs. 74. 75 & 77 to same scale). Fig, 80, Aspidosiphon
hartmeveri; introvert hook (after Fischer). Figs. 80-86, Aspidosiphon inquilinus; 81, entire animal; 82, anal shield: 83, small papilla
from introvert, 84, single pointed hook from introvert; 85. spiny papilla from anal shield; 86, dissected specimen, Figs. 87-88,
Clogosiphon aspergillus; 87, anterior cap; 88, introvert hook.
ah REC, §. AUST, MUS, I8 (1):
The first of these to be described was A. elegans,
The description of Chamisso and Eysenhardt is very
brief and deals with external features only, Their
figures, however, show that their specimens arc
those of an Aspidosiphon with an anal and caudal
shield. an introvert which arises ventral to the trunk,
that the introvert is armed wth hooks and spines, the
latter increasing in size the more posteriorly they lie.
Their specimens were collected ‘on the low-lying or
small (= humiles) islands of the Pacific Ocean, in
places that are washed by the tides, and boring in
coral rocks, apparently by means of their shield (=
scutum)”, Griibe’s (1868) description of A. elegans
from specimens from the Red Sea is fuller. The
anterior shield is furrowed to some extent, the spines
on the introvert are largest posteriorly and the
papillae on the trunk are more prominent must
posterior to the anal shield, His drawing of the
bilobed hooks, however, is difficult to follow, The
most detailed description of the species is that of
Selenka and de Man 1883, their specimens having
been collected from the Philippines and the Red
Sea, the latter specimens showing some differences
from those from the Philippines.
The specimens which I am describing from the
Pacific Ocean (Hawaii, Solomons, New Hebrides
and the Great Barrier Reef) resemble A, elegans.in
the follawing respects (1) the presence of double-
pointed hooks with internal marking like those af A.
elegans (2) flat papillae composed of polygonal
plates (3) the spination of the introvert posterior to
the hooks, the spines being largest on the dorsal
surface and at the base of the introvert (4) the
presence of a single retractor which stems from two
roots attached to the posterior third of the body wall
(5) the presence of two nephridia attached for most
of their length.
Selenka's specimens, however possessed a caecum
and a fastening muscle. Nevertheless, | am regarding
my specimens. as A. elegans,
An examination of Sluiter’s specimens af A. exilis
from (1) Siboga Stn. 172 (2 spec.) labelled '‘type”’
and (2) Diuzend Ejl (Tausend Is.) (1 spec.) shows
that they are identical with what I am regarding as
A. elegans. The hooks, spines and papillac
cortespond in all respects. Consequently T have
placed A. exilis Sluiter, 1886 in the synonymy of A,
elegans, A- homomyarius Johnson, 1964, according
to his description, is also very closely related to A,
elegans.
A, elegans seem to have been found only io
formations of coral,
No previous Australian record,
Distribution: (1) in Australia: Queensland at
Three Is. and Lizard Is. (Gt. Barrier Reef).
1-74 January, 1980
(2) elsewhere: Pacific Is. (Chamisso and
Eysenhardt, 1821), West Caroline Is. (Sato, 1935),
Japan (Sato, 1939); Hawaii (in the present paper);
Funafuti (Shipley, 1898): Indonesia (Sluiter, 1886);
Philippines (Selenka & de Man, 1883); Gulf of
Manaar (Gravely, 1927), Mauritius (Wesenberg-
Lund, 1959b); Red Sea (Griibe, 1868, Herubel,
1904, Fischer, 1914. Wesenberg-Lund, 1957)
Specimens examined and localities; Queensland
—Great Barrier Reef at Three Is. (4) coll. Dr. P. E.
Gibbs SAM E1265, at Lizard Is. (5) coll, P. Wearne,
at Heron Is. (1) coll, R- Reichelt.
The description of the species given abave was
based on these specimens and about 20 more from
Hawaii.
*Aspidosiphon exhaustus Sluiter
Aspidosiphon exhaustus Sluiter 1912, pp, 20-21, pl.
1, fig. 11,; Murina, 1972, pp. 295-298, 1977, p.
42-43, fig. 98,
Location of type; ? Zoological Museum, Amster-
dam; specimen from off Morocco (36° 42'N, 8°
40’ 3C’W at 310-749 m).
Description (based on Sluiter 1912): Trunk 17 mm
long and 2mm wide, Introvert about as long as
trunk and armed with numerous rows of very small,
transparent hooks with long bent points. Anal shield
aval and marked posteriorly with 12 radial furrows,
Caudal shield with 10 furrows. Two retractor
muscles, attached to caudal shield, join to form a
single muscle. Two long nephridia attached to trunk
for most of their length.
Murina (1972) gives the length of her Australian
specimen as 15 mm and reports the presence of 20
furrows on the anterior shield,
Australian record: off coast of N,S.W_, (33° 34’ 5”
S, 152° 06’ S$” E) at depth of 425 m. 1 specimen;
Murina 1972, pp. 295-298.
Distribution: (1) in Australia: off coast of New
South Wales.
(2) elsewhere; off Morocco (Sluiter, 1912); Pacific
Ocean at 27° 13" 8, 109° 25" W and Atlantic Ocean at
5° §, 11° E (Murina, 1972).
Aspisosiphon gracilis Baird
(Figs 94-964)
Pseudaspidosiphon gracile Baird 1868, p. 103, pl. 10,
figs 1, la,
Aspidasiphon gracilis: Selenka and de Man 1883, pp.
122-123, fig. 22, 209-213; Rice and Stephen
1970, p, 69,
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCULA) 47
Location of type: Natural History Museum,
London, reg. no, 43,5,15, 58a-b; specimens
from Philippine Is.
Description: Specimen long and slender, Trunk
about 45 mm long and 2:5-3:0 mm wide, curved to
resemble a horse-shoe, grey and bearing dark
brown, hemispherical papillae which contrast with
lighter coloured background of trunk, Because the
darker papillae and the lighter areas of the trunk
tend to lie in short longitudinal rows the trunk
appears moitled.
Anal shield with 10 almost complete longitudinal
furrows, Caudal shield sharply conical and with
about 28 complete and a few incomplete radial
furrows, Brown papillae. consisting of numeraus
closely set polygonal plates, are 0:10-0:22 mm in
diameter and at their summit there is a white pore,
Similar but smaller papillae lie on posterior surface
of introvert and on body wall between radial furrows
of caudal shield.
Introvert, light yellow in colour, about 40 min
long and 1-4mm wide arising ventrally to anal
shield; armed with small single pointed hooks, with
width of base greater than height. Small conical
papillae also present on surface, Prominent spines
(fig, O00) scattered over much of introvert. A
tendency for the musculature to be striated circularly
is evident in the dissected specimen, Baird
comments on a similar condition in his specimens,
“Corpus gracile, — - - —striis circularibus cinctum,
Two retractors arise fram body wall near posterior
extremity of trunk, Alimentary canal very long and
much. coiled. Contractile vessel poorly developed.
Neither an intestinal fastener nor caecum found,
Two very long, free, almost black nephridia, nearly
as long as trunk, arise at about same level as anus,
Systematic position: This specimen is one of the
few which have been recorded and described,
No previous Australian record.
Distribution: (1) in Australia: Queensland at Low
Ts,
(2) elsewhere; Philippine Is.
Specimen examined and locality: Queensland
—Low Is. (1) coll, Dr. P, E, Gibbs, SAM E1254.
Aspidosiphon hartmeyeri Fischer
(Fig. 80)
Aspidosiphon hartmeyeri Fischer, 1919a, p. 277:
1927, p. 204, Edmonds, 1956 p. 306, fig. 18;
Cutler, 1977, pp, 147-148.
Location of type; Not known to author; type
locality, Shark Bay, Western Australia,
Description; Trunk as long as 20 mm. Introvert
about same length. Shields darker than trunk and
composed of thick polygonal plates. Anterior shield
with 5-6 furrows, posterior with 24-25, Introvert with
hooks of two points and more posteriorly irregularly
arranged spines. Tentacles 6-8. One retractor muscle
with two long roots fixed near caudal shield. Strong
spindle muscle fixed posteriorly, Nephridia more
than half length of trunk, free for most of their
length and opening just posterior to anal aperature.
Longitudinal musculature continuous} circular mus-
cles tend to form anastomosing bundles, most
readily noticed in dissected animals. This probably
accounts for the ‘“Querstreifung” noticed by Fischer
(1919), Two eyespots. Edmonds (1956) reports an
intestinal fastener to last intestinal whorl and a
caecum,
Systematic position; Although described from
Australia the species is not well Known in this
country, The hooks of Edmonds’ (1956) specimens
are slightly different from those of Fischer, The
Species needs redescription from specimens col-
lected at the type locality, T have used Fischer's
figure of the hook.
Previous Australian records: Western Aus-
tralla—Shark Bay (Fischer, 1919a); Rottnest Is,
(Edmonds, 1956), South Australta—Great Austra-
lian Bight (37° 18" S, 138° 43" E ar 795 m) (Cutler,
1977),
Distribution; (1) in Australia: Western Australia
at Shark Bay and Rottnest Is,; off coast of South
Australia,
(2) elsewhere; West African coast (Wesenberg-
Lund, 1959a); Cuba (Murina, 1967).
Specimen examined and locality: Western Aus-
tralia—Rottnest Is., (1) SAM E1250,
Aspidosiphon inquilinus Sluiter
(Figs. 81-87, 89)
Aspidosiphon inquilinus Shuiter, 1902, p. 29-30, pl. 2,
figs 21-22.
Location of type: Zoological Museum, Amsterdam;
specimen from Siboga Stn. 282 (8° 25-2” S, 127°
18” E, 27-54 m). In shell of Dentalium sp.
Description: Description based on three speci-
mens found in shells of Denralium sp. and one from
shell of a nassariid mollusc. Specimens from
Dentalium small, slender, sub-cylindrical becomine
more slender posteriorly, Trunk 4-8 mm long, 0:7-
1-0 mm wide anteriorly and 0-5-0-7 mm posteriorly
Colour off-white to pale yellow. Specimen from
gastropod coiled.
48 REC. 8. AUST. MUS. 18 (1):
Anal and caudal shields strongly differentiated
from trunk and brown to dark brown in colour. Anal
shield subtriangular with about 14-18 longitudinal
furrows, surmounted by hard, warty and knobby
papillae which are usually arranged so as to form
approximately 3-5 transverse furrows. A feature of
the shield is that 6-15 of the most anterior placed
papillae are modified to form spine-like structures,
Caudal shield conical with about 18 complete and
incomplete furrows.
Introvert (not completely evaginated in any
specimen) about as long as trunk or little longer,
slender and about 0-5 mm wide. No tentacles
observed in a dissected specimen but this point
needs checking. Anteriorly introvert bears 25 ar
more rows of very small single-pointed hooks about.
0:015-0:020 mm tall and wide. Between rows of
hooks and over most of surface of introvert are
numerous, small, tubular papillae or glands about
0-02 mm tall, Spines are also distributed over surface
of introvert.
Papillae or skin bodies on trunk mostly elliptical in
shape. Longitudinal musculature continuous, Intro-
vert retractor single for over half its length but
arising from two shorter roots attached to or near
caudal shield. Oesophagus emerges from between
roots of retractor and loops up; single fastening
muscle attached to jt. Spindle muscle fixed
posteriorly and a wing muscle present, Rectum with
small conical caecum. Two free nephridia, about
half as long as trunk, attached to body wall at about
level of anus.
Systematic position; I have compared these with
the holotype of A. inquilinus Sluiter, described from
a single specimen found in a Dentalium shell in the
Timor Sea (8° 25" S, 127° 18’ B) and consider them to
be the same. The holotype is cylindrical and its
shields are well defined. The anterior shield,
however, is obliquely inclined to the longitudinal
axis of the trunk but in the opposite way to the usual,
its anterior region is tucked in and slopes down to
the introvert (the effect is produced by the
contraction of the longitudinal musculature nearby
in the trunk), One important point, not mentioned
by Sluiter, is that a few of the knob-like papillae
which comprise the anterior part of the anal shield
are modified to form sharply pointed hooks or spines
which are obscured to some extent in the holotype
by the introvert, The introvert retractor of the
holotype (a dissected specimen) is single for well
over half its length and arises from two shorter roots
fixed to the trunk near the caudal shield. The
specimens from Moreton. Bay are smaller and so are
their hooks, They possess a caecum and an intestinal
fastener, neither of which is mention in the type
description. Unfortunately, owing to the frail and
1-74 January, 1980
damaged condition of the gut, it is difficult to say
whether the structures are now present in the
holotype or ever were.
FIG. 89. Aspidosiphon
from Moreton Bay, Queensland; one in shell of
Pentalium).
inguilinus, (twa specimens
The Australian specimens are also closely related
to Aspidosiphon kovaleskii Murina, 1964a collected
from the shells of Denzalium sp. in the Adriatic and
Aegean Seas. They differ, however, from A.
kovaleskii in that (1) externally they possess spines
and tubular papillae on the introvert and (2)
internally they possess a caecum, only one fastening
muscle and nephridia which are free and not
attached,
Murina, 1972, p. 295 reported A. exhaustus
Sluiter, 1912 living in the dead shells of gastropods
(Mitra sp.) from the coasts of New South Wales and
Western Australia. A. exhaustus, however lacks the
spine-like structures on its anal shield and is
consequently thought to be. different.
No previous Australian record.
Distribution:
Queensland.
(1) in Australia: Moreton Bay,
(2) elsewhere: Timor Sea (Siboga Stn, 282),
Specimens examined and localities: Three speci-
mens from shells of Dentalium sp. collected during
Moreton Bay Survey, Queensland by Stephen Cook
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCULA) 49
(Dept. of Zoology, Univ. of Queensland) at Stn. 28
in March, 1973. Two were dissected. One specimen
also collected from shell of a nassariid at same
locality; depth 10m. SAM E1266,
Aspidosiphon jukesii Baird
(Figs, 97-99)
Aspidosiphon jukesti Baird, 1873, p. 97; Rice and
Stephen, 1970, pp, 68-69
Aspidosiphon corallicola Sluiter, 1902, pp. 19-25,
Location of type: Nat. Hist. Museum, London: reg.
na, 1965.25.3; specimen from Lee Sandbanks
(Great Barrier Reef), Queensland,
Description: All the specimens had been removed
from the coral and fixed and the introvert was
retracted except in two, where it was partly
extended. Trunk either curved in a circle or coiled.
with am estimated maximum length of 28 mm and
maximum width of 5-8 mm. Anterior shield almost
horseshoe-shaped, very dark in colour and warty,
with radial furtows well developed on dorsal half.
Furrows on ventral side of shield less strongly
marked and run almost at right.angles to radial ones,
Anus. prominent dorsally, just below anal shield,
Posterior shield conical to hemispherical, light
yellow and with radial furrows. Both shields
correspond very closely to those of A. jukesii shawn
in figs. 21-23 of Rice and Stephen (1970).
Introvert (in retracted state) with length about
thcee quarters that of trunk and bearing (1) small,
doubly pointed hooks, (2) spines of variable size and
(3) small, slender, sub-conical papillae which arise
from hemispherical base. Papillae well developed on
anterior and posterior fourth of trunk, A strong
introvert retractor, dividing posteriorly into two
stout roots, attached to body wall near caudal shield,
Longitudinal musculature cantinuous, Rectum
long; without caecum and fastening muscle, Spindle
muscle attached posteriorly. Nephridia slender,
about half to three quarters as long as trunk and
attached for about half of their length, Elliptical ta
spherical eggs 0-12-0-16 mm in diameter,
Systematies and remarks; These specimens from
Queensland correspond very closely to Baird's A
Jukesii as redescribed by Rice and Stephen (1970)
and A. coerallicola Sluiter 1902. Baird's specimens
were obtained from Lee Sandbanks (Great Barrier
Reef) and Sluiter's from solitary corals, including
Heteropsammia michelini from Indonesia, Through
the kindness of the authorities of the Zoolapical
Museum of Amsterdam | have been able to compare
my Specimens with those of Sluiter (reg. no.
V.Si.7.). The examination confirms the conclusion
of Rice and Stephen (1970), that A. jukesii and A.
corallicala are synonymous. The species is well-
illustrated in Rice and Stephen, 1970.
The association between the salitary corals
Heteropsammtia and. Heterocyathus and the sipuncu-
lan A, jukesii was first reported by Edwards and
Haime, 1848a and 1848b and has been redescribed
by a number of writers, listed by Rice (1976). In a
discussion on the matter Rice says, “The
Aspidosiphon inhabits a spiral cavity in the base of
the coral and, through an opening of the cavity on
the under surface of the coral, the sipunculan
extends its introvert into the surrounding substratum
pulling the coral about as it probes and feeds in the
sand. Through this association, the sipunculan is
provided with a protective habitat and, by
movements of the sipunculan, the coral is
maintained in an upright position on the surface of
the substratum and transported about to different
feeding areas.” The developmental history of the
association has also been carefully studied, Accord-
ing to Rice, “The juvenile Aspidosiphon, when
| mm or less in length, enters an empty pastrapod
shell, usually a small Cerithium. A coral planula
settles on the shell, overgrowing and eventually
enclosing it. Only those planulae settling on shells
occupied by sipunculans have any chance of survival.
Growth of the sipunculan and the coral are well
synehronized, the sipunculan actively enlarging its
cavity as 4 spiral tube in the base of the growing
coral while maintaining an opening of the tabe on
the underside of the coral”.
Preyious Australian record: Queensland: Baird
(1873), Goreau and Yonge (1968).
Distributian: (1) in Australia: Queensland at
Heron Is. and Lizard Is.
(2) elsewhere: Malaysia, Gulf of Manaar, Zan-
zibar and Madagascar,
Specimens examined and localities: Queensland
—Lizard Js., (20) in the solitary coral Heterapsam-
mia michelini; coll, D, Fisk (Dept, of Botany, Univ.
of Queensland) SAM E1255 and E1256; Wistari
Reef, Heron IJs.. ‘tin salitary coral’ AMS W5620-
Genus Paraspidosiphon Stephen
Paraspidosiphon Stephen, 1964, p, 457; Stephen &
Edmonds, 1972, p. 237,
Description; Sipunculans with anal and caudal
shields and with characters similar to those of
Aspidesiphon Diesing but differing in that the
longitudinal musculature of body wal) is grouped
into bands. which may anastomose, sometimes
considerably, Intravert, arising from ventral side of
trunk, may be armed with haoks or spines, often
SU REC. §, AUST. MUS. 18 (1);
both. Tentacles as in Aspidosiphon, Introvert
retractors one or two short roots. Spindle muscle
attached posteriorly.
Type species: Paraspidosiphen steenstrupii (Diesing,.
1839),
Remarks; Stephen considered that the condition
of the longitudinal musculature warranted the
separation of Paraspidosiphon from Aspidosiphon
and Fisherana from Phascolosoma. Not everybody
agrees with this. Both Cutler (1973) and Murina
(1975b) consider that Paraspidosiphon warrants the
status anly of a subgenus, The genus contains about
25-30 species, most of which liye in burrows. in
limestone or coral reefs.
Specimens of Paraspidosiphon klunzingeri and P.
steenstrupii reported from Low Is, by Edmonds
(1956) are now being referred to other species, the
former to P. johnstoni n.sp. and the latter to P,
formasanus (Sato),
KEY TO AUSTRALIAN SPECIES GF PARASPIDOSIPHON
Ll. Introvert hooks with asingle point...) 6.5... peepee 2
Introvert hooks with Two paints... ...- baal caees ad
. Numerous rectal appendages present... .. P. cumingit (p.50)
Numerous rectal appendages absent - P. jahnstonia.sp. (p.5!)
rh
3. Introvert hooks with a thin, posteriorly directed, tongue-like
extension of cleatarea ... -... .... P. steensirupit (p.51)
Introvert without tongue-like extension of clear area
P. formosatus (p.50)
*Paraspidosiphon cumingii (Baird)
Aspidosiphon cumingii Baird, 1868, p, 102; Selenka
& de Man, 1883, pp. 113-115, pl. 13, figs 183-
186; Rice & Stephen, 1970, p, 67,
Paraspidosiphon cumirgii; Stephen & Edmonds,
1972, pp. 243-244.
Location of type: Nat. Hist. Museum, London:
specimen from Philippines.
Remarks: This species is often reported from
tropical and near tropical localities and is allied to P,
kKlunzingeri. The introvert, however, is armed with
single-pointed hooks and spines. The anterior shield
has 12-13 furrows around its margin and the caudal
has 30 of which only about 12-13 reach the centre of
the structure. There are 27-28 longitudinal muscles
antériorly and 32-34 posteriorly. According to
Selenka the posterior region of the tectum is thickly
bordered with long, tufted villi (‘Das letzte Ende
des Mastdarmes ist dicht mit langen zottenartigen
Gebilden besetzt’”), There is one broad retractor
which spans about 19 muscle bands; sometimes. the
retractor may split into as many as four roots. Two
nephridia, attached for about two-fifths of their
length extend to the posterior of the trunk. Selenka
states that it has a strong fixing muscle.
1-74 January, L980
Australian record: Low Is., Queensland (Monro,
1931),
Distribution: (1) in Australia; Low Is,, Queens-
land.
(2) elsewhere; West Indies, Red Sea, Philippines,
Zanzibar, Malaysia,
Paraspidosiphon formosanns (Sato)
(Figs 90, 92, 93)
Aspidosiphon formosanus Sato, 1939, pp, 421-424,
text figs 55-57, pl, 21, fig. 23.
Paraspidosiphon formosanus: Stephen & Edmonds,
1972, p. 245; Edmonds, 1971, pp, 144-145,
Aspidosiphon steenstrupii: Edmonds, 1956, p. 307,
fig 19.
Location of type: Not known to author; specimen
from Sinko, Taiwan (Formosa).
Description: Specimens yellow to pink and tend to
be slender. Trunk of largest 30-32 mm long and 2:5-
4-0 mm wide and tending to curve inwards on
ventral side. Anal shield elliptical, dark brown to
black and composed of small knobby wartlike bodies
to which white calcareous material may be attached;
without furrows, although its periphery may be
ridged, Caudal shield light brown, rounded, or
conical and sometimes only weakly developed; if
conical, weak radial furrows may be present but if
rounded they do not appear. Papillae on trunk most
prominent on surface adjacent to anal shield and are
composed of small, closely packed, polygonal to
rounded platelets; diameter of largest papillae
0-45 mm, Papillae near anal shield usually separated
by grooves, which themselves are covered with small
polygonal platelets, Papillae on mmid-trunk region
usually smaller, more rounded and scatteied or even
absent in some specimens, Papillae on posterior
trunk larger and more prominent,
Introvert of retracted specimens about half as Jong
as trunk; of expanded ones nearly twice as long. A
few stoutly digitiform tentacles protrude adjacent to
mouth in one specimen; surface of introvert just
posterior to mouth is smooth and _ callarlike.
Introvert armed with many rows of hooks with two
paints and spines with one point. Small truncated to
cylindrical papillae lie between rows of hooks and
among spines. Secondary or minor tooth of hooks
tends to curve more strongly than primary ane.
Internally, clear area which at base of hook is halt to
three quarters as wide as hook, gradually tapers
towards apex of hook, None of the mounted hooks
show the posteriorly directed, tongue-like extension
of the clear area like that shown for P. steenstrupii in
fig. 192 of Selenka & de Man (1883) nor the
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCULA) 5!
FIG. 90, Paraspidosiphon formosanus,
from Queensland),
(Specimen
indentation on the right side of the clear area shown
in fig. 59 of Sato (1939), Although all spines are
single pointed, their shape varies considerably; some
closely resemble single pointed hooks, some are
more tetrahedral and others more slender and
pointed, The variation is much like that shown for P.
grandis in fig. 49 of Sata (1939).
Two introvert retractors, arising from muscles 2-5,
2-6, or 3-7 a short distance in front of caudal shield,
remain separate for about one to two thirds of length
of trunk before fusing to form a stout, single
retractor, Oesophagus, carrying a simple contractile
vessel, is attached to single retractor. Intestine with
about 22 double spirals and rectum with a caecum.
Spindle muscle strong and fixed posteriorly. No
fixing muscle. Nephridia long (extending to
posterior extremity of trunk), fixed for about half
their length and opening at about same level or just
posterior to that of anus. Brain simple with two
eyespots.
Sytematics: Although the internal anatomy is very
much like that of P, steenstrupii (Diesing), the hooks
of these specimens lack the thin tongue-like
extension of the clear area shown in fig. 192 of
Selenka & de Man. (1883) and in pl. | fig. 4 of
Augener (1903), The shape of the hooks is close to
that of P, amthonensis (Augener, 1903), The shields
of the latter, however, are furrowed. The specimens
are also close to P. makoensis (Sato, 1939) and P.
formosanus (Sato, 1939), two species which
themselves are allied. The shape of the hooks of the
Australian specimens corresponds to those of the
latter.
Edmonds (1956, p. 307 and fig. 19) described
some specimens from Heron Is,, Queensland as P.
sieenstrupit. | now think that this identification was
wrong. The hooks, as shown in fig. 19, are like thase
of the specimens which 1 am now describing from
Magnetic Is, and lack the tongue-like extension of
the clear areas as shown by Selenka & de Man and
Augener. Consequently the record of 1956 is now
placed in the synonymy of P. formosanus,
No previous Australian record.
Distribution; (1) in Australia: Queensland.
(2) elsewhere: Formosa, Guam,
Specimens examined and localities: Queensland
—Low Is,, (2) SAM E1275; Magnetic Is. (2) SAM
E1277.
*Paraspidosiphon steenstrupii (Diesing)
Aspidosiphon steenstrupii Diesing, 1859, p. 767, pl.
2, figs 1-6; Selenka & de Man, 1883, pp, 116-
118, pl. 1, figs 12-13, pl. 13, figs 190-192.
Paraspidosiphon steenstrupii: Stephen & Edmonds,
1972, p, 254.
Location of type: Not known by author; specimen
from St. Thomas.
Remarks: This species differs from P. formosanus
in possessing introvert hooks in which the clear area
carries a thin tongue-like extension, much like that
of Aspidosiphon elegans, Edmonds (1956, p. 307,
fig. 19) described some specimens from Low Is, as P.
steenstrupil. | now think that they should have been
called P. formosanus and am transferring the 1956
record to the synonymy of P, formosanus. P.
Steenstrupii has often been recorded from tropical
and subtropical seas.
Australian record: Low Is,, Queensland (Monro,
1931).
Distribution; (1) in Australia: Low Is., Queens-
land.
(2) elsewhere: West Indies; Brazil; Mauritius:
Red Sea; Laccadive Is,; Japan; Philippines; New
Hebrides; Indo China; Loyalty Is., and Cuba.
Paraspidosiphon johnstoni n. sp.
(Figs. 91, 100-102)
Aspidosiphon klunzingeri: Monro, 1931, p, 34;
Edmonds, 1956, pp. 308-9, fig. 20, pl, 3, fig. 1.
52 REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18 (1):
Location of type: Australian Museum, Sydney;
specimen fram coral in Moreton Bay, Queens-
land (coll. Prof. T. H. Johnston).
Description: Trunk usually cylindrical, sometimes
curved ventrally, 20-45 mm long and 3-5 mm wide.
Introvert, arising ventrally from trunk, is in fixed
specimens about as long as or a little longer than
trunk and armed anteriorly with very numerous
(165) rows of single pointed hooks with a stout base
and a curved tip. Hooks in posterior rows noticeably
smaller than those in anterior rows. Posterior to
rows of hooks is a narrow zone of scattered, single
pointed “hooks” or ‘‘spines”, closely resembling
those more anteriorly, but which are much smaller
and lack fine internal markings, Posterior part of
introvert with out spines. Small, truncated ta sub-
conical papillae lie between rows of hooks and on
surface of trunk. Tentacles short, few and finger-like
lying in a part ring dorsal to mouth as in
Phascolosoma,
FIG, 91
Paraspidasiphon johnstoni, (specimen from
Queensland).
Shields dark gold to red brown in colour, wartlike
in texture and appearance and prominent. Anal
shield fan-like, lying obliquely to trunk and
possessing 10-16 complete and incomplete furrows
which radiate dorso-ventrally like ribs of a fan.
Posterior shield conical, often carrying a rim at
junction with trunk and possessing 22-28 complete
and incomplete radial furrows. Furrows of both
|-74 fanuary, 1980
shields may extend over lateral margins of shield,
thus making surface of trunk joining shields appear
furrowed. Furrows correspond approximately to
tissue between longitudinal muscles.
Body wall thick and longitudinal musculature in
25-32 anastomosing bundles. Circular musculature
tends to form fascicles, Retractor muscle very
strong, arising from two short roots each of which
spans muscles 1-8, 2-7, 2-6 and 1-9 well in front of
caudal shield. Oesophagus attached to retractor
muscle tor part length of latter. Intestinal spirals
numerous and extend to posterior of trunk,
Nephridia tubular, about three: quarters as long as
trunk and fixed for anterior quarter. No intestinal
fastener and no rectal caecum. Wing muscle strong;
in addition two strong muscles are attached to
rectum near anus and run transversally across body
wall to muscle 1 or 2 on each side of nerve cord.
Spindle muscle stout, arising anteriorly from body
wall under rectum, and fixed posteriorly, A strand of
fine tissue connects rectum and body wall in some
specimens, Contractile vessel without villi.
Systematic position; The specimens closely
resemble P. klunzingeri (Selenka & de Man) in the
shape and marking of the introvert hooks and in
internal anatomy. They differ from it, however, in
that (1) no rectal sac bearing numerous lobes on
both sides is present (‘am Rectum sitz ein grosser,
an beiden Seiten vielfach gelappter Blindsack”’) (2)
they lack a well defined region of introvert spines
and to a less extent (3) the spindle muscle arises
from the body wall under the rectum and not in front
of the anus (“‘Ein Spindelmuskel nimmt unmittelbar
vor dem After seinen Antang’’),
The Australian specimens also resemble P.
pachydermatus (Wesenberg & Lund, 1937), P.
grandis (Sato, 1939) and P. cumingit (Baird, 1868),
They differ in that the last three species possess
rectal appendages as clearly shown in Wesenberg-
Lund 1937, fig. 9, Sato, 1939, fig. 50 and Selenka &
de Man, 1883, fig. 186b. They also differ from (1) P,
angulatus (Ikeda, 1904) in the internal markings of
the hooks (2) P. speciosus (Gerould, 1913) in the
shape of the hooks and the number of longitudinal
muscles (3) P, schnehageni (Fischer, 1913) in which
the shields are not furrowed, the longitudinal
muscles 10-14 and in which there is. no fastening
muscle (Ditadi, 1975). and (4) P. tenuis (Sluiter,
1886) in which the hooks are long and slender,
Edmonds (1956, pp, 308-9) identified two
specimens from Low Is. as Aspidosiphon klunzin-
geri, remarking at the time that they lacked rectal
appendages. | now think that [ was wrong in so
doing. I have re-examined them and consider that
they should be placed in the synonymy of P.
Johnstoni.
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCULA) 53
Specimens examined and localities: Queensland Raine Is, (11° 35’ S, 144° 1’ E) coll. 1. M. Thomas,
—Low Is., (2) coll. Dr. P. E. Gibbs, SAM 1274; SAM E1272; Moreton Bay, in coral (8) coll. T. H.
Two Is., (4) coll. Dr. P. E. Gibbs, SAM E1273; Johnston SAM E1270,
FIGS, 92-102, Figs. 92-93, Paraspidosiphon formosanus: 92, dissected specimen; 93, introvert hooks, spines and papillae. Figs. 94-96,
Aspidosiphon gracilis; 94, dissected specimen; 95, introvert hooks; 96, spine fram introvert. Figs. 97-99, Aspidosiphon jukesii: 97,
introvert hook; 98, Introvert spine (same scale as 97); 99, trunk papilla. Figs. 100-102, Paraspidosiphon johnstoni; 100, dissected
specimen; 101, posterior shield; 102, introvert hooks.
54 REC. S. AUST. MUS, 18 (1):
Genus Cloeosiphon Grube
Cloeosiphon Grube, 1868b, p. 48; Selenka & de
Man, 1883, p. 126; Stephen & Edmonds, 1972,
p. 267.
Description: Trunk surmounted by a raunded to
pineapple shaped cap, consisting of numerous.
small, white, calcareous plates. Introvert arises from
centre of cap. Rows of two-pointed hooks present on
introvert, No cap or shield at posterior of trunk,
Longitudinal muscles continuous, Spindle muscle
fixed posteriorly. Two nephridia.
Type species: C, aspergillus. (Quatrefages, 1865),
Remarks; Although four species have been
described in this genus most workers consider them
to be synonymous. C. aspergillus is commonly found
in coral formations in most tropical seas,
Cloeosiphon aspergillus (Quatrefages)
(Figs. 15, 87-88)
Loxosiphon aspergillus Quatrefages, 1865, p. 605, pl.
20, fig. 20.
Clogosiphon aspergillus; Selenka & de Man, 1883,
pp. 126-7, pl, 2, figs 23-24, pl. 14, figs 214-216;
Edmonds, 1956, pp. 309-310, fig 21, pl. 3, fig 2;
Stephen & Edmonds, 1972, pp, 267-268.
Location of type: Not known by author; type
locality: 7?
Description: Trunk cylindrical, 10-45 mm long
and 2.5-4-9 mm wide, bearing anteriorly a white,
calcareous knob or cap, 2-5 mm in diameter and
composed of small, white, polygonal plates of 4-4
sides, arranged in spiral rows. Each plate possesses a
small brown pore, No cap, shield or knob at
posterior extremity. Introvert slender, about as long
as trunk, arises from centre of anterior cap and
armed with double-pointed hooks. No spines on
introvert,
Longitudinal musculature continuous. Trunk
smooth although covered with glands, largest and
most closely placed on anterior and posterior
surfaces, Single retractor arising from twa short
roots. One fastening muscle. No intestinal caecum;
spindle muscle fastened posteriorly. Nephridia dark,
long (extending to base of retactor) and fixed for
their entire length.
Systematic position: The identification of these
specimens depends on the presence of the calcareous
cap or knob and the shape of the introvert hooks.
The cap is sometimes rounded, sometimes shaped
like a pineapple or more flattened. The internal
marking of the hook also varies ta some extent, A
number of authors consider that C, japonicus Ikeda,
1-74 January, 1980
1904, C. javonicus Stluiter, 1886 and C, mollis
Selenka & de Man are synonymous. The matter is
discussed in Stephen & Edmonds, 1972, p, 268.
Previous Australian records: Queensland: Munro,
1931; Edmonds, 1956,
Distribution; (1) in Australias Queensland (in
coral formations); Low Is., Heron Is., Lodestone
Reef, One Tree Is.
(2) elsewhere: widely in the Indo-Pacific region.
Specimens examined and localities: Queens-
land—Heron, Is., SAM E1292 (8), E1293 (1), E1294
(2), Low Is,, SAM E1301 (4): Townsville SAM
E1295 (1).
Genus Lithacrosiphon Shipley
Lithacrosiphon Shipley, 1902, p, 139; Fischer, 1919b,
p. 289, Fischer, 1922, pp. 26-28; Stephen and
Edmonds, 1972, p. 259; Cutler and Jurczak,
1975, p, 243,
Description: Anterior end of trunk surmounted by
a hard, calcareous, cone-shaped cap borne ona pad
of skin; longitudinal muscles fit into pad_ Introvert
arises On ventral side of trunk or cap and bears
numerous rows of hooks with one or two points.
Longitudinal muscles form bands which may
anastomose freely. Two retractors and two nep-
hridia. Spindle muscle fixed posteriorly.
Type-species: Lithacrosiphon maldivensis Shipley,
1902.
Remarks; All the species so far described have
been found in formations of coral, Cutler and
Jurezak (1975) have critically reviewed the genus
and reduced the number of species from 9 to 3. The
valid species. are now L. maldivensis Shipley (the
type), L, cristatus (Sluiter) and L, wniscistatus
(Ikeda). Only L. ecristatus has been found in
Australia,
Lithacrosiphon cristatus (Sluiter)
(Fig. 16)
Aspidosiphon. cristatus Sluiter, 1902, p. 26, pl. 2, figs.
15-16,
Lithacrosiphon cristatus Fischer, 1922, p. 26; Cutler
and Jurczak, 1975, p. 243.
Location of type: Zoological Museum, Amsterdam;
specimen from Malaysia (Siboga Stn. 53,
Waingapu),
Description; Specimens small; trunk of Jargest
9 mm long and 3 mm wide, Anterior region of trunk
with form of a truncated cone, the surface of which is
marked with a number of almost longitudinal
furrows. Posterior to furrowed area trunk bears
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCULA) 55
prominent, hemispherical swellings or papillae.
Introvert estimated to be about as long as trunk,
Longitudinal muscles in 17-22 anastomosing bands.
Two introvert retractors, Two nephridia about half
as long as trunk. Both uni- and bidentate hooks
present on intravert, those most distally being
bidentate.
The identification of these specimens depends on
the facts that (1) the anal shield ts furrowed and (2)
the distally placed hooks have two teeth while the
proximal ones have one. No previous Australian
record,
Distribution: (1) in Australia: Lizard Is., Queens-
land,
(2) elsewhere; ‘wide tropical distribution”
(Cutler); Malaysia, Timor, Saipan, Gilbert Is.,
Hawaii, Panama and the Caribbean,
Specimens examined and localities: Queensland-
—Lizatd Is, (8) coll, P, Weate AMS and (3) SAM
£1289; Yonge Reef, east of Lizard Is., (1) AMS
W 10542.
Family Phascolosomatidae and key to genera
Phascolosomatidae Stephen and Edmonds, 1972 p.
269.
Description; Specimens bottle- or flask-shaped,
sometimes sub-cylindrical, Finger-like tentacles
lying in a near circle dorsal to mouth and
surrounding nuchal organ. Longitudinal muscles
grouped in bands, except in one small genus.
Papillae conical to hemispherical in shape, often
mamillate and darkly pigmented and usually covered
with small platelets; most prominent and most
densely grouped at anterior and _ posterior
extremities of trunk, Retractor muscles four, very
rarely two,
Type genus: Phaseclosoma Leuckart, 1828,
KEY TO GENERA OF PHASCOLOSOMATIDAE
1. Species in which longitudinal musculature forms bands
Phascolosoma (p, 55)
Species in which longitudinal musculature is continuous
Fisheranat
Genus. Phascolosoma Leuckart
Description; Trunk spindle-lke sub-cylindrical,
flash-shaped or fusiform. Longitudinal muscles
always in bands, which may anastamose. Muscle
bands not always visible externally but readily seen
on dissection. Tentacles lie in a horse-shoe dorsal ta
mouth and enclose nuchal organ. Introvert and
* Specimens of this small genus have not yet been found in
Australia, Cutler & Murina (1977, p. 183) consider Fisherana
better placed in the family Gollingjidae
trunk usually covered with prominent, conical ta
hemispherical papillae, often brown to dark red-
brown in colour. Trunk papillae usually largest and
most densely distributed on anterior and posterior
surfaces (especially on dorsal side), Retractors four,
very rarely wo. Contractile vessel single and usually
simple.
Type species; Phascolosoma granulatum Leuck-
art, 1828.
SUBGENERA OF PHASCOLOSOMA AND KEY TO
SUBGENERA
Stephen & Edmonds (1972, p, 271) divided the
genus inta four subgenera. Of these, two,
Phascolosoma s,s, and Satonus, are known in
Australia.
1, One pair of retractormuscles,.........,,... Rueppellisorna
Two pairs of retractor muscles .... _... piig ca Bibs
tN
. Contractile yessel with villior tubules,..,...... Anmillesorna
Contractile vessel withour yillior tubules... ___, , ee
3. Spindle muscle fixed to posterior of trunk
Phascalosama s.s (p, 56)
Spindle muscle not fixed to bady wall posteriorly
Satonus (p, 61)
Remarks: Specimens of Phascolosoma ate the
most commonly collected intertidal sipunculans in
Australia. They are found in limestone and coral
reefs (some species bore into the rack; Rice, 1969,
1976), in masses of tubiculous polychaetes, in
clumps of mussels, in rock crevices, under stones
and in mangrove flats, Most appear to be detritus
feeders (Rice, 1976). The larval development af
some species has also been studied by Rice (1970). A
list of the species reported from Australia is given on
p.7 of the present paper.
Identification of species: I have not been able to
construct a simple and satisfactory key to the
Australian phascolosomatids.
P. nigritorquatum, however, differs from all the
other species because (1) its spindle muscle,
according to the type description, is not fixed
posteriorly (2) its mouth is surrounded by a row of
very dark granular swellings and (3) the introvert
bears four rows of hooks. It is not a well-known
species.
The shape and markings of the introvert hooks
and the structure of the papillae are two characters
most commonly used in the identification of species,
Consequently L have figured the hooks of all the
species,
The hook of P. noduliferum has a comparatively
wide base, a tendency to narrow near its mid length
and a fine clear streak running from the apex to the
mid-base. The papillae of P. noduliferum are usually
hemispherical and carry few platelets; they are not
56 REC. 8. AUST. MUS. 18 (1):
heavily pigmented and tend to be uniformly
distributed. Pigmented bands on the introvert are
lacking,
P. arcuatum differs from other species in (1) the
arrangement of its retractor muscles (2) the
presence of sub-epidermal coelomic extensions
(3) the tendency of its circular musculature to form
small bundles and (4) its lack of fixing muscles. The
clear area of the hook is very wide basally. The
species has becn found only in association with
mangroves,
The papillae of P. anulatum are covered with
large contiguous, polygonal plates which usually are
darker in colour at the base of the papillae.
Polygonal plates like those on the papillae are
scattered on the body wal] between the papillae, The
hoak of P. annulatum is “scolops-ugassizi"'-like and
consequently not a very useful distinguishing
character.
The hook of P. albolineatum is stout; its pointed
part is strangly bent and lies almost parallel] to the
base of the hook. The central clear “streak” is wide
and slopes sharply to a basal corner of the hook.
There is a well developed clear, triangular area on
the side of the streak away from the tip of the hook.
The papillae of P. pacificum tend to be sharply
conical so that specimens may feel ‘“bristle-like”.
The introvert hook is sharply bent, its clear streak
widens basally and it possesses a clear triangular
ared, The nephridia extend almost to the extremity
of the trunk and are fixed to the body wall for most
of their length. Specimens are sometimes mottled in
colour,
The hook of P, stephensoni has a clear triangular
area on one side of the clear streak that runs from
the apex to the base and on the other side a clear
crescentic area. The latter is characteristic,
The hooks af P. rottnesti and P. scolops resemble
each other closely except that the clear streak of P
rottnesti may sometimes be slightly swollen neae its
middle. A rectal caecum, reported to be absent in P-
scolops, is present in P. rotmesn, The papillae of P.
rommesti consist of more numerous and smaller
platelets than those of P. scalops.
In P. perlucens a number of elaw-like papillae or
spines are present at the base of the introvert
(especially on the dorsal side) and on the posterior
region of the trunk. The hook is bent rather sharply.
The clear streak of the hook of P nigrescens is
swollen slightly in its upper half and very much
expanded posteriorly, The basal part of the
expansion is indented slightly so as to form a bulge
or a tongue Which is directed towards the tip of the
hook.
1-74 January, 1980
| now consider that P.. heronis Edmonds, 1956 and
P, dunwichi Edmonds, 1956 were incorrectly named;
the former should have been called P, stephensoni
(Stephen, 1942) and the latter P. scolops (Selenka
and de Man, 1883), The reasons for the changes are
given in the text,
Phascolosoma (Phascolosoma) albolineatum Baird
(Fig. 106)
Phascolosoma albolineatum Baird, 1868, pp. 91-92;
Rice and Stephen, 1970, p. 59; Stephen and
Edmonds, 1970, p. 293.
Phymosoma albolineatunt Selenka and de Man,
1883, pp, 71-74, pl. 9, figs. 128-129,
Location of type: Nat. Hist. Museum, London, reg,
no. 1925.25.1; specimen from Philippine fs,
Description: This. description is based on the four
specimens mentioned below and 16 others from the
Solomon Is. Trunk off-white to pale straw in colour
except at junction with introvert where it is dark
brown; length 9-34 mm and width (in mid-region of
trunk) 3-8 mm. Straw coloured introvert, about half
to three quarters as long as trunk, with a number of
black bands of varying size on its dorsal side. An
almost complete ting of short, stubby, light tentacles
(26 in one specimen) lies dorsal to mouth,
Immediately posterior to mouth there is a smooth
eollar-like region. Posterior to collar, iutravert ts
atmed with rows (28 in one specimen) of dark
coloured stout hooks, with a strongly bent tip.
Central, clear region af hook wide and slopes
sharply to basal corner, A triangular shaped, clear
area lies basally on one side of central clear area.
Papillae on introvert brown, pointed, sub-conical
or mamillate, becoming larger and more densely
placed basally. Papillae on trunk largest anteriorly
and (-2-0-3 mm in diameter; in mid-trunk region
they are smaller and more scattered and about
0-15 mm in diameter and posteriorly slightly Jarger
and closer together,
Longitudinal musculature in about 20 anastomos-
ing bundles. Four retractors, arising in posterior half
of trunk: a stout ventral pair from muscles 2-6 or 2-7
and a more slender, dorsal pair more anteriorly from
bands 4-6 or 5-7. Oesophagus fastened to retractors
by thin mesenteries, A strong fastener arising from
muscle 1 on left side near base of darsal retractor
runs towards junction of oesophagus and intestinal
spiral, giving off one branch to posterior oesophagus
and another branch to last spiral of intestine. No
rectal caecum. Wing muscle strong. Spindle muscle
attached near anus and at posterior extremity of
trunk. Contractile vessel simple. Nephridia, about
half as long as trunk, fixed for about half their length
and attached at same level as anus.
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCULA) »
Remarks: The shape of the hooks is a very useful
specific character of this species.
No previous Australian record.
Distribution: (1) in Australia: Great Barrier Reef,
Queensland.
(2) elsewhere: an Indo-Pacific species: Natal,
Aboina, Java, Indo-China, Philippines, Japan,
Tokara Is., Palau, West Caroline Is.
Specimens examined and localities: Queensland
—Great Barrier Reef at Three Is,, (2) SAM E1315
and at Casuarina Beach, Lizard Is., (2) WAM
220/76.
Phascolosoma (Phascolosoma) annulatum Hutton
(Figs. 103, 107-8)
Phascolosoma annulatum: Hutton, 1879, p. 278;
Benham, 1903,-p. 174; Edmonds, 1960, pp. 160-
2, text figs. 1-2; Stephen and Edmonds, 1972,
pp. 296-297; Cutler, 1977, p. 151.
Physcosoma scolops var. mossambicense Augener,
1903, p. 339 (in part).
Physcosoma scolops var. tasmaniense Fischer, 1914,
p. 3, pl. 1, figs. 4-6.
Physcosoma scolops Wheeler, 1938, p. 346,
Phascolosoma tasmaniense Edmonds, 1956, pp. 285-
286, figs. 5-6.
Location of type: Not known by author; specimen
from Campbell Is,, New Zealand.
Description: Trunk 25-49 mm long and 4-7 mm
maximum width, Introvert about as long as trunk (in
fixed specimens), with 20-30 short finger-like
tentacles lying in a near ring dorsal to mouth.
Numerous rows of dark coloured introvert hooks,
resembling those of P, scolops (Selenka and de Man)
and P. agassizii Keferstein. The hook possesses (1) a
clear streak (sometimes swollen near its middle)
running down through the ‘centre’ of the hook and
(2) a clear triangular area on one side of the streak.
Specimens brown but anterior and posterior of
trunk made dark- to red-brown or almost black by
pigmentation of papillae. Papillae at base of
introvert dark red, conical and closely packed,
particularly on dorsal surface; those on anterior and
posterior surface of trunk largest, most prominent,
conical or hemispherical, about 0-2-0-4 mm _ in
diameter and densely packed. Papillae may coalesce
or run into one another; composed of polygonal
plates set closely together. At base of papillae there
1s usually an almost complete ring of what appears to
be darker plates, much as is shown for Phascolosoma
japonicum (Griibe;) by Sato (1939, fig 29), Papillae
=o
on mid-region of trunk smaller and more scattered,
A feature of the species is that dark-brown
polygonal plates are scattered over the surface
between papillae. Whether they are detached plates
of the larger papillae is not certain, A number of
pigmented bands, usually best developed on dorsal
side, partly surround anterior surface of introvert
Pigmented patches sometimes appear on trunk,
FIG. 103. Phascalosoma annulatim, (specimen trom
South. Australia).
Longitudinal muscles in 18-25 anastomosing
bands, usually visible externally. Two stout ventral
retractors arising from muscles 2-5, 2-6, 2-7, 3-5 or 3-
6 and two more slender dorsal retractors from 5-6, 4-
6 or 4-7 are attached to posterior half of trunk, One
fastening muscle, connecting muscle 1 on left side ta
last spiral of intestine, may bifurcate giving a second
root to oesophagus. Contractile vessel without villi.
Spindle muscle arises anteriorly near anus and is
fixed posteriorly, Nephridia, usually about half
length of trunk fixed to body wall for about half to
two thirds of their length and arising near anus.
Gonads at base of ventral retractors. Largest sub-
elliptical eggs 0:11-0:13 mm long. Rectal caecum
present in some specimens from South Australia
(SAM 1323), rudimentary or absent in others but
present in those from New Zealand (SAM 1324 and
1325).
Sytematic position: P. annulatum differs from all
other Australian phascolosomatids in the structure
58 REC. 8. AUST. MUS. 18 (1);
of its papillae and in the presence of platelets on the
body wall between the papillae. The platelets are
polygonal and appear ta be detached platelets. from
the papillae. It differs from P, agassizii Keferstein in
the structure of the papillae and from P. japenicurn
Griibe which lacks polygonal platelets on its surface.
In spite of the fact that the rectal caecum is bettet
developed in New Zealand specimens I regard the
specimens from southern Australia and New
Zealand as the same species. According to Cutler
(1977, p, 181), Wesenberg-Lund in an unpublished
work disagreed with this. Although T have not
examined Augener's, Fischer's nor Wheeler's
specimens | have placed them in the synonymy of P.
annulatum, Figs, 4 and 5 of Fischer (1914) are the
papillae and platelets of P. annulatum and the Sir
Joseph Banks Group of islands, where Wheeler's
material was collected, lie off Port Lincoln, South
Austraha, a locality where P. annulatum is
commonly collected,
Previous Australian records: Augener (1903),
Fischer (1914), Wheeler (1938) and Edmonds
(1956),
Distribution: (1) in Australia: along coast of South
Australia irom Baird Bay (Eyre Peninsula) to
Kileunda; Victoria; along northern and eastern
coasts aft Tasmania.
(2) elsewhere: New Zealand; Campbell and
Stewart Islands.
Specimens examined and localities: South Aus-
tralia—Nuyt's Archipelago (2) SAM E1529, Baird
Bay (5) SAM E1231; Pearson Is, (12) SAM E1528;
Grindel fs. (5) SAM E1334; Port Lincoln ‘in
calcareous reef’ SAM E1322; Cape Donnington (2)
SAM E1333; West Is, (1) SAM E1329; Corny Pt. (8)
SAM E1329; Pondalowie Bay (5) SAM E1396;
Beachport (3) SAM E1527; Emu Bay. Kangaroo Is,,
(2) SAM 61537; Stokes Bay, Kangaroo Is., (4) SAM
E1532; Elliston (10) SAM E1540. Vic-
toria—Shoreham (5) SAM E1327 and (1) NMV
G1218; Portland (1) coli, NMV; Cape Patterson (1)
coll. NMV; Kilcunda (5) call. NMV. Tas-
mania—Eaglehawk Neck (3) SAM E1331 and (1)
TMH £101-1553; Port Latta (1) coll, NMV; Dunally
(5) TMH 166; Fossil Is. (1) TMH K82-i4482,;
Taroona Beach (1) TMH K206; Bicheno (2) coll,
NMV;, Erith Ts. (1) AMS W6562.
Phascolosoma (Phascolosoma) arcuatum
1828)
(Figs. 104, 109-111)
Sipunculus arcuatus Gray, 1828, p. 8,
(Gray,
Phascolosoma arcuatum: Baird, 1868, p. 88%; Rice
and Stephen, 1970, pp. 50-52, pl. 1-
174 January, L980
Phymasoma lurco Selenka and ce Man, 1883, pp. 61-
63, pl. 1, fig 5, pl. 8, figs 103-110.
Physcosoma lurce; Fischer, 1895, p. 12.
Phascolosoma lurco: Edmonds, 1956, pp, 290-291,
text fig 10.
Location of type: Nat, Hist, Museum London;
specimen from India.
Description: Trunk stout, almost uniformly
cylindrical, 15-120 mm long and 6-10 mm wide; body
wall light-brown to brown except at anterior and
posterior of trunk Where it is usually dark-brown to
brown-black. Posterior extremity of trunk may be
ipvaginated slightly,
Introvert of fixed specimens with length varying
from half to same as that of trunk, Horseshoe-
shaped ring of tentacles lies dorsal to mouth. More
posteriorly as. many as 75 complete or partially
complete rows of dark coloured hooks, with a large
expansion basally of clear streak which runs from
apex to base. Papillae between raws of hooks small,
about 0-02 mm in diameter, those at extremities of
trunk larger, 0-5-0-:6 mm in diameter, prominent
and very dark, consisting of numerous polygonal
plates, Their structure is.clearly shown in pl, 1, fig. 2
af Rice and Stephen (1970).
Longitudinal muscles in 16-23 broad, anastomas-
ing bands not always visible externally. Circular
muscles tend to form fascicles, as shown in fig. 103 of
Selenka and de Man (1883). Rice and Stephen
(1970, p. 50) point out that small coelomic pockets
extend into spaces between Jongitudinal and circular
musculature. Four retractors fixed ta body wall in
posterior third of trunk, a strong ventral pair to
muscles 1-2, 2-3, or 1-3 and a more slender dorsal
pair more anteriorly to 1-2 or 2-3. Retractors fuse for
most of their length into one, larger flat muscle,
Thin walled oesophagus attached to fused part of
retractor for most of length of latter. Spindle muscle
fastened anteriorly near anus and posteriorly to
body-wall. Rectum short and without a caecum. No
fastening muscle, Wing muscle strong, Nephridia
about halt to three quarters as long as trunk and
fixed for about three quarters of their length.
Contractile vessel without villi. Gonads at base of
ventral retractors, Brain, a white swelling with
pigmented eyespots,
Systematic position and remarks: This species is
distinguished from other Australian phas-
colosomatids by (1) the structure of the introvert
hooks (2) the arrangement of the retractors and (3)
the presence of subepidermal, coelomic extensions.
Tt is associated with mangroves and was for a long
time known as P. lurea. Harms and Dragendarf
(1933) and Green and Dunn (1976) have studied the
ionic and osmotic balance of the species.
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCULA) 59
FIG. 104. Phascolosoma arcuatum,
from Rockhampton, Queensland),
(specimen
P. arcuatum, according ta Green and Dunn, lives
from the highest to the lowest levels of mangrove
swamps along the west coast of peninsular Malaysia
and consequently is subject to extremely variable
salinities. According to their researches P. arcuatum
is physiologically an osmoconformer. Green (1975)
has studied the reproductive cycle of Australian
specimens.
Previous Australian records; Baird (1868), Fischer
(1895), Edmonds (1956).
Distribution: (1) in Australia: in mangrove flats in
Queensland at Sandgate, Townsville and Rock-
hampton and in Western Australia at Derby,
(2) elsewhere: Malaysia, Indo-China, Philippines
and Java.
Specimens examined and localities: Queensland
—mouth of Ross River “in mangroves” (8) SAM
F1335; Sandgate (5) SAM E1336 and (3) AMS
W3605; Calliope River (3) “amongst mangrove
seedlings” SAM E1526; Townsville “in mangroves”
(10) SAM 1337, Western Australia—Derby (King
Sound) “in mangroves on tidal flat’ (2) SAM E1388
and E1389.
Phascolosoma (Phascolosoma) nigrescens Keterstein
(Fig. 112)
Phascolosoma nigrescens Keferstein, 1865, p, 424,
pl. 32, fig. 14-15: Edmonds, 1956, p. 289, text
fig, 9; Stephen and Edmonds, 1972, p. 315.
Phymosoma nigresecens Selenka and de Man, 1583,
pp. 73-74, pl. 9, figs. 130-137,
Location of type: Not known to author; specimen
from Fiji.
Description: Trunk 15-45 mm long and 2:5-6 mm
wide, light to dark-brown in colour, Introvert of
fixed specimens may be as long as trunk but usually
shorter, with group of short tentacles dorsal to
mouth, Smooth collar present on introvert and more
posteriorly 18-35 rings of light to dark-brown hooks
(fig. 112). Although the clear area that runs from the
apex of the hook towards its base is always expanded
slightly in the middle, the shape of the clear area
basally varies noticeably; in specimens {rom Broome
there is a small hump but in those from Low Is, and
Myora the hump is enlarged to a tongue-like
protrusion. Introvert with stoutly conical papillae
(0:05-0:07 mm in diameter) between rows of hooks,
and usually with a number of pigmented bands on
dorsal surface.
Papillae on trunk and introvert numerous, pointed
and more uniform in shape and distribution than in
most Phascolosoma, At posterior extremity of trunk
papillae concial to mamillate, about 0-2 mm tall and
0-2 mm broad, with a pore at apex and consisting of
dark coloured, elongate, radiating plates. A number
of very dark papillae may be scattered randomly on
trunk and introvert of specimens.
Longitudinal muscles in about 20 anastomosing
bundles. Two stout ventral retractors arise in mid-
third of trunk from muscles 1-7, 2-7, 2-8, or 3-9 and
two slenderer dorsal retractors more anteriorly from
6-8, 5-8 or 7-9, the dorsal and ventral muscle on
same side of nerve cord soon fusing, Strong spindle
muscle attached near anus and at posterior extremity
of trunk. Rectum and spindle muscle may fuse for
part of length, A fastening muscle to posterior
intestine may give a branch to oesophagus. Strong
wing muscle and rectal caecum present. Contractile
vessel simple, Nephridia fixed for half or third of
their length, about half as long as trunk and arising
at about level of anus.
Systematic position: This species is identified
largely by the structure of its hooks as shown in figs.
130 and 135 of Selenka (1883) and in the present
material. Edmonds (1956) mentioned that the
contractile vessel of his specimens possessed very
REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18 (1):
1-74 January, 1980
FIGS. 105-115. Fig. 105, anterior region of introvert of a Phascolosama, showing position of tentacles, mouth and nuchal organ (after
Theel). Fig. 106, Phascolosoma albolineatum: introvert hook, Figs. 107-108, Phascolosoma annulatum: 107, introvert hooks: 108,
trunk papilla, Figs, 109-111, Phascolosoma arcuatum: LO9. dissected specimen; 110. intravert hook; 111. trunk papilla. Fig, 112.
Phascolosoma nigrescens; introvert hooks. Fig, 113, Phascolosoma nigritorquatum; introyert hooks (from one of Sluiter’s
specimens), Figs. 114-115, Phascolosoma naduliferum; 114, introvert hook; 115, trunk papilla.
small villi. Although I have not been able to re-
examine the same specimens I now think that I
mistook some very small wrinkles or crenations of
the muscular wall of the vessel to be villi.
It is difficult to find a satisfactory character which
can be used to distinguish P. nigrescens from P.
puntarenae Griibe. The relationship between the
two is discussed by Fisher (1952, p, 430-432). If they
are the same, P. puntarenae Griibe, 1859 has
priority. The species is often associated with coral
formations,
Previous Australian records: Queensland—Low
Is,; (Munro, 1931); Heron Is. (Edmonds, 1956).
Western Australia—Cape Jaubert (Fischer, 1921);
Shark Bay (Fischer, 1919a), Cape Dennison
(Edmonds, 1956).
Distribution: (1) in Australia—Queensland;
northern New South Wales; north west Australia.
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (S/PLUINCULA) pl
(2) elsewhere; widely in Indo-Pacific region; West
Afnica.
Specimens examined and localities: Queensland
—Low Is,, “in coral” (2) SAM E1344; Magnetic Is,,
(1) SAM E1345; One Tree Is,, (1) SAM E1346;
Three fs., (1) SAM E1347; Cockle Bay (2) SAM
E1350; Myora (1) SAM E1351; Wistan Reet
(Capricorn Group) (2) SAM E1352. New South
Wales—Woolgaoga (1) coll, NMV: Lennox Head (3)
AMS W10545 and (6) AMS W10544. Western
Australia—Cable Beach (near Broome) (3) SAM
E1349; Broome (Pt, Gantheaume) (3) WAM 10922,
Dampier Archipelago (1) WAM 132/76 and (1)
WAM 222/76.
*Phascolosoma (Satonus) nigritorquatum (Sluiter)
(Fig, 113)
Phymosoma nigritorquatum Sluiter, 1882, pp, 151-
152, pl. i, figs 3, 8, 11; Selenka and de Man,
1883. pp. 68-69.
Physcasema_ nigritorquatum; Sluiter, 1902, p. 13;
Fischer, 1919a, p, 280; 1921, p, 4-5, figs 1-2;
1927, p. 416,
Phascolosoma nigritorquatum: Stephen & Edmonds,
1972, p. 186.
Location of type: Zoological Museum, Amsterdam:
specimen from Batavia ‘trom coral islands".
Description; T have not examined any Australian
specimens of the species. It has, however, been
reported twice from Western Australia by Fischer
(19194, 1921). According to Sluiter the length af the
body is 2-5-3 times its width. Posterior region
pointed. Papillae very numerous, especially at
anterior and posterior extremities of trunk. Longitu-
dinal muscles in 20-22 bands and circular muscula-
ture continuous. Introvert about a quarter as long as
body, Two anterior retractors weaker than two
placed more posteriorly, A narrow papillae-tree
zone at base of introvert. A row of black granulated
bodies? (‘‘Karner'') and swellings? (‘‘Wiilste”) lie in
a half ring around margin of mouth, The pigmented
bands extend in successive rows around anterior part
of introvert. Four rows of small, slender introvert
hooks. Tentacles arising from two folds. Intestine
with only a few, nine, spirals, No spindle muscle.
Two anteriorly swollen nephridia, Colour of animals
dark yellow to brown. Length without introvert
13mm,
In a ‘discussion’ that follows the description,
Sluiter says that the black bands? or ridges?
("*Leiste’’) on the introvert are characteristic of the
species and that sometimes they anastomose. The
first of the black bands is never completely
invaginated and remains visible even if the introvert
is retracted.
The account of Selenka & de Man is only a
Tepetition of Sluiter’s. Fischer (1921. p. 5) records
that a specimen fromm Western Australia ig 12 mm
long and its introvert 8-9 mm. Skin yellow-white.
Introvert hooks sickle-shaped and in 5-6 tows.
Longitudinal muscles in 20-22 bundles. Two broad
ventral retractors arise in posterior third from
muscles. 2-7, Intestine of 10-12 double spirals.
Fischer says that a spindle muscle is present and that
it is fixed posteriorly.
Systematic position: Recently T have re-exarnined
two of Sluiter’s specimens (V 51, 80, Baai v.
Batavia) from the Zoological Museum, Amsterdam
The tube cantaining them bears the label “type”;
one was partly dissected. Body small, trunk 5-8 mim
long and 25-4mm maximum width; pointed
posteriorly. Introvert of each specimen almost
completely retracted. Longitudinal muscles in 19-23
bundles visible externally; some anastomeasdtion.
Papillae most prominent on anterior and posterior
surfaces of trunk; often sharply pointed and spine-
like, Surface of papillae carries small rounded-
polygonal platelets (much like those of P. seolops)
and underlying there seem to be rather long radially
arranged plates. In the specimen that I dissected a
number of red-brown bands were found on the
introvert. especially the dorsal surface. 1 was not
able to find Sluiter’s “intens schwarzer Kérner and
Wilste”. A few rows of clear, unpigmented
introvert hooks were present (fig. 113); they do not
correspond very well with those drawn by Sluiter
and Fischer and resemble closely those of P. scalops
and P. rottnestti, Introvert retractors four, the dorsal
and ventral pair on each side almost spanning the
same number of muscles. The gut of the specirneni
Whieh I dissected was thin, frail and not in gaod
condition and that of the other (1 extended the cut
already present a little further anterjorly and
posteriorly) was surrounded by coagulated fnaterial
which was difficult to remove, In neither was [ able
ta find @ spindle muscle anteriorly nor the point at
attachment of such a musele near the anus. No sign
of a posteriorly placed spindle muscle was present ii
ane specimen but in the other a stout muscle
emerges from the last intestinal spiral and is attached
to the bady wall. Consequently I have not been able
ta check conclusively whether a spindle musele is
present or absent in P. nigritorquatum. The answer is
important because in the subgenus Satonus a spindle
muscle is either absent or not attached posteriorly.
P. nigritorquatum is the type of the subgenus, If P-
nigritorquatuim possesses a spindle muscle Satonus is
invalid and another subgenus must be erected and a
new type found, No information about the presence
of a caecum or fastening muscle can be given. The
two nephridia are free, Some sub-elliptical-shaped
eggs (0-10-0-13 mm) lang and (0-07-0-075 mm) wide
a2 REC. S. AUST, MUS, 18 (1);
with a nucleus about 0-025 mm in diameter were
present.
Previous Australian records: Fischer, 19194; 1921.
Distribution: (1) in Australia—Western Aus-
tralia, Cape Jauberr and Shark Bay.
(2) elsewhere: Bay of Bantam, Indonesia.
Phascolosoma (Phascolosoma) noduliferum Stimpson
(Figs 114-115)
Phascolasoma noduliferum Stimpson, 1855, p. 390;
Keferstein, 1865, p. 423, p. 32, figs 16-17;
Edmonds, 1956, pp. 286-288, text figs 7-8;
Cutler, 1977, p, 152,
Physcosoma grayi Baird, 1868, pp. 88; Rice &
Stephen, 1970, p, 52,
Location of type: Not known to author; specimen
from Port Jackson, New South Wales,
Deseription; Trunk 12-65 mm long and 3-7 mm
wide, brown or light brown in colour with only a
slight darkening at its extemities, Introvert of fixed
specimens about as long as trunk, lacking pigmented
bands but possessing (1) about 20-25 short,
digitiform tentacles and (2) a varying number of
dark brown hooks (fig. 114). Shape of hook
distinctive, with broad base and a thin clear streak,
running from apex to base of hook,
Papillae usually hemispherical and more uni-
formly distributed on trunk than in P. annulatum,
largest 0:3-0-4 mm in diameter. consisting of
numerous small plates and scattered granules.
Longitudinal musculature in 20-26 bands, not always
visible externally because body wall is thick. Four
retractors, a stout ventral pair attached to muscles 2-
6, 2-7 or 1-6 in posterior half of trunk and a weaker
dorsal pair more anteriorly to muscles 4-6, 5-7 or 6-
7, Oesophagus fixed to retractors by two short
mesenteries. Spindle muscle fixed anteriorly near
anus and posteriorly to body wall, Wing muscle well-
developed, A fastening muscle arising from muscle 1
or 2 near base of left ventral retractor runs to last or
penultimate intestinal spiral; sometimes supplying a
branch to oesophagus.
Nephridia half to three quarters as long as trunk
and fixed for about three quarters of their length,
Contractile vessel simple. No rectal caecum. Brain
appears as slight swelling in some specimens} two
eyespots. Elliptical eggs about 0-12 mm in diamter.
Systematic position; Edmonds (1956, p, 288)
discussed at some length the status. of this sipunculan
commonly collected along the eastern and southern
coasts af Australia and which has often been called
P. japonicum (Selenka and de Man, 1883, p. 77;
Dakin, 1952, p, 157 and Whitlegge, 1899, p. 11).
This. probably stems from the identification of two
specimens from New South Wales as P. japonicum
1-74 January, 1980
by Selenka and de Man, 1883. The two specimens,
tegistered as 85.12.3.30 and 85.11.3.30, are in the
British Museum (Natural History, London). They
possess the hooks and papillae of P. noduliferum and
not P. japonicum.
There is considerable overlap in the distribution of
P, noduliferam and P. annulatunr in Victoria and
Tasmania, Specimens of both have been recorded
fram Eaglehawk Neck, Dunally and Bicheno (in
Tasmania} and from Kilcunda and the Nobbies (in
Victoria). The differences in their habitats at these
places is not known, P. noduliferum occurs in New
South Wales, Victoria, Tasmania and South
Australia. Two specimens are also known from the
South coast of Western. Australia.
P, noduliferum differs from allied Australian
species in the structure of its hooks and papiilae.
Pigmented bands on the intravert have not been
described for the species.
Previous Australian records: Stimpson (1885);
Edmonds (1956); Cutler (1977) (7 specimens
dredged at 85-1340 m off South Australian coast),
Distribution: (1) in Australia—New South Wales,
Victoria, Tasmania, South Australia and south coast
ot Western Australia.
(2) elsewhere—Malaeca Sts, (at 1140 mm),
Mindanao (at 22 m), Pt. Moresby (New Guinea) (at
8 m), Campbell [s. (off south coast of New
Zealand). All of these records are from Cutler
(1977, p, 152),
Specimens examined and localities: New South
Wales—Newport (6) SAM E1353; Long Reef (3)
SAM E1354 and (1) AMS W10548; near Sydney (6)
SAM E1356; Harbord (3) AMS coll,; Botany Bay
(2) AMS W548. Victoria—the Nobbies, Western
Port (8) SAM E1355 and (1) NMV GI129: Phillip Is.
(2) SAM B1357; Godfrey reef near Larne (1) NMV
coll.; Cape Bridgewater (1) NMV coll.; Portsea Pier
(1) NMV coll.; Malacoota (2) AMS W10547,
Tasmania—Bicheno (2) NMV coll.; Jacobs Boat
Harbor (1) TMH coll.; Dunally (2) TMH K/166;
Eaglehawk Neck (8) TMH coll.; and (2) TMH
K102/15532 and (5) SAM E1397; Erith Is, (1) AMS
W10569, South Australia—Cape Northumberland
(1) SAM E1390. Western Australia—10 miles cast
of Hopetown (1) SAM E1400; off south coast (35°
15' S, 126° 22' E) (1) WAM 145/76.
Phascolosoma (Phascolosoma) pacificum Keferstein
(Figs, 120-121)
Phascolosoma pacificum Keferstein, 1866, pp. 8-9;
1867, pp. 49-50, pl. 6, Figs 1-2, Edmonds, 1956,
pp. 291-292, text fig. 11, Stephen and Edmonds,
1972, pp, 317-318.
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS GF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUINCULA) 63
Phymosoma pacificum: Selenka and de Man, 1883,
pp. 63-65, pl. 2. fig 6, pl. 7, figs 111-112.
Location of type; Not known to author; specimen
from Gilbert and Tarawa Is. (Kingsmill Group,
Pacific Ocean).
Description: Trunk of largest specimen 102 mm
long and maximum width (in posterior third of
trunk) about & mm. Light brown to brown in colour
with a darker mottling in some specimens. Mottling
on anterior surface of trunk may be less irregular
and more band-like, especially on dorsal surface.
Body wall thick and banding of longitudinal muscles
not usually visible externally.
Introvert in fixed specimens about as long as
trunk, with a group of digitiform tentacles dorsal ta
mouth and with humerous complete and incomplete
rows of large, dark-brown hooks, 0-07-0-10 mm
wide basally and 0-07-0-09 mm tall.
Papillae on introvert and trunk numerous, closely
packed, sharpely pointed and conical so that animal
feels rough and bristle-like (a fact mentioned by
Selenka and de Man), On mid-region. of introvert
papillae 0-20-0-25 tm tall, 0-15-0-2 mm wide; on
posterior of trunk becoming 0-3 mm tall, 0-3 mm
wide. Papillae composed of very small granules with
a pore at apex,
Longitudinal muscles in anastomosing bundles,
ahout 20 anteriorly and 35-40 posteriorly, Four
retractors, a stout ventral pair arisingin mid-third of
trunk and attached to muscles 2-7 or 2-8, and a
dorsal pair more anteriorly and attached to same six
or seven muscles. Retractors fuse anteriorly,
Intestinal contents of coarse sand and coral
fragments. One fastener to last or second to last
spiral or intestine, Spindle muscle stout and attached
posteriorly. No caecum in two dissected specimens
Contractile vessel simple. Nephridia pigmented
brown ar brown-black, very long (extending almost
to extremity of trunk) and fixed to trunk wall for
their whole length,
Systematic position; This species is identified by
the size and shape of its introvert hooks and the
presence of nephridia which extend almost to the
posterior extremity of the trunk and which are fixed
ta the body wall for their whale length-
Previous Australian records: Queensland—Low
ls. (Monro, 1931); Heron Is. (Edmonds, 1956),
Distribution: (1) in Australia—Great Barrier
Reef, Queensland; Northern Territory.
(2) elsewhere: Indo-Pacific, Madagascar, Zan-
zibar, Mauritius, Red Sea, Ambaina, Indo-China,
Japan, Philippines, Gaum. New Britain, West
Carolines,
Specimens examined and localities: Quceens-
land—Heron Is, (1) SAM E1358; Low Is. (1) SAM
E1359; Turtle Is, (2) SAM £1360; Dunwich (1)
SAM E1364; Michaelmas Reef, Cairns (2) AMS
coll. Northern Territory—Fannie Bay Rocks,
Darwin (1) AMS coll.
Phascolosoma (Phascolosoma) perlucens Baird
(Figs, 117-119)
Phascolosoma perlucens Baird, 1868, p. 90, pl. 10,
fig. 2; Rice and Stephen, 1970, pp, 63-64,
Phyimosoma dentigerum Selenka and de Man, 1883,
pp. 67-68, pl, 1, fig, 7, pl, 9, figs. 118-123,
Phascolosoma dentigerum: Fisher, 1952, pp. 432-
434, pl. 36, figs. 4-7.
Location of type: Nat. Hist. Museum, London. reg.
no. 1847,12,30,11; speeimen from Jamaica (in
coral rock).
Descriptian; Specimens tend ta be slender and
straw coloured in alcohol, Trunk of largest 45 mm
long and 4-5 mm wide. Body wall thin and almost
transparent in some regions, Introyert about half to
three quarters as long as trunk (in fixed specimens)
with (1) a number of very dark-brown bands on
dorsal surface (2) prominent, dark-red-brown,
spine-like papillae or tubercles on posterior dorsal
surface and (3) rows of light- to dark-brown hooks
anteriorly, Spine- or claw-like papillae mostly point
backwards and vary in size, the largest being about
0-6-0-7 min tall and about 0-5 mm wide basally (fig
00). A fine tube runs from tip of spine to its base, the
diameter of tube increasing basally, Anterior half or
third of hook strongly bent and lying almost parallel
to base of hook, central clear area expanded near its
middle and a clear triangular area present basally
Papillae on posterior trunk darker than on trunk and
tend to be claw-like} largest about 0-3 mm tall and
0-25 mm wide at base. Posteriorly placed claw-like
papillae of two Australian specimens not as
prominent as those shown in Fisher, 1952, pl. 39,
fig, 5,
Longitudinal muscles in about 22 anastomosing
bands, Retractor muscles four, a ventral pair
attached fo muscles 2-7 or 2-6 in mid-third of trunk
and a dorsal pair more anteriorly to 5-8, Contractile
vessel slender and without villi. One fastening
muscle ta last spical of intestine, Caecum not
abseryed (Fisher, 1952 claims that one is present),
Nephridia fixed to trunk for about one third of their
length and about one third as Jong as trunk
Systematic position and remarks: The shape of the
introvert hooks and the presence of large claw-like
structures on the dorsal surface of the introvert
make this one of the easier species of Phascolosoma
64 REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18 (1):
to identify, Fisher (1952) redescribed and figured it.
The species is probably better known in the
literature as P. dentigerum, The Australian speci-
mens were collected in coral rock, Rice (1976)
describes the feeding behaviour of the species.
Previous Australian record; Low Is., Queensland
(Monro, 1931).
Distribution; (1)
Reef, Queensland,
in Australia—Great Barrier
(2) elsewhere—Baja California, Gulf of Panama,
Rotuma, Funfuti, Marshall Is., Eniwetok Atol,
Philippines, Laccadive Is., Batavia, Madagascar,
and the West Indies,
Specimens examined and localities: Queens-
land—on Great Barrier Reef; Three ts., (1) SAM
E1365; Tree [s,; (2) SAM E1366; One Tree Is,, (1)
AMS W5525, Lizard Is., "in coral” (3) SAM E1395.
Phascolosoma (Phascolosoma) rottnesti Edmonds
(Figs, 116, 124-126)
Phascolosoma rottnesti Edmonds, 1956, pp. 282-284,
text figs. 1-4.
Physcosoma agassizii Fischer, 1919a, p. 277;
Fischer, 1922, p. 7, pl. 1, figs. 3, 5 and 6.
Location of type: Australian Museum, Sydney;
specimen from Rottnest Is., Western Austraha,
“from burrows in calcareous rock’
Description; Trunk 10-52 mm long and maximum
width (in posterior third) 3-5 mm, Expanded
introvert of fixed specimens about as long as trunk.
Freshly collected animals pale to pink-brown in
colour except at extremities of trunk which are dark-
to red-brown. Red-brown bands, varying in number
and width, usually present on dorsal surface of
introvert, Trunk of few specimens is mottled by a
number of red-brown spots. Partial ring of tentacles
lies dorsal to mouth, From 15-45 rows of light ta
dark brown hooks, resembling those of Phas-
colosoma scolops (Selenka and de Man 1883, fig.
143) and Phascolosoma agassizii Keferstein, 1867,
pl. 6, fig. 4 but not fig, 8, present on introvert
anteriorly, A clear triangular area is always present
on one side of the clear streak, which runs fram the
apex of hook to its base.
Papillae between rows of hooks very small and
forming complete transverse rings; towards base of
introvert they are larger, about 0-1 mm in diameter,
pointed or conical and darker in colour. On anterior
surface of trunk papillae larger, especially on dorsal
side, 0-2-0:35 mm in diameter, more hemispherical,
more densely packed and dark brown in colour. In
mid-trunk region papillae smaller, rounded, more
scattered and less prominent, On posterior surface
1-74 January, [980
FIG.
Rottnest Island, Western Australia),
116. Phascalosoma rattnestt, (specimen from
they are large, 0-2-0-45 mm in diameter, closely
packed and dark brown, All papillae consist of small
plates of almost uniform size.
Longitudinal muscles in 20-24 anastomosing
bands, not always visible externally. Four retractor
muscles, a strong ventral pair arising in posterior
half of trunk from muscles 2-5, 2-6, 2-7 or 3-7 anda
weaker dorsal pair more anteriorly from 4-6, 5-6, 5-7
or 6. Anterior oesophagus attached to dorsal
retractors by thin mesenteries, Spindle muscle
fastened near anus and at posterior extremity of
trunk, Contractile vessel simple, One fastener
arising from muscle 1 on left side joins last or
penultimate spiral of intestine, sometimes giving off
a branch to posterior oesophagus. Rectal caecum
present, Nephridia, attached to body wall for about
half their length, about two thirds as long as trunk
and arising at about same level as anus, Brain
sometimes observed as slight swelling with two
eyespots, Gonads at base of ventral retractors.
Systematic position: The identity of the specimens
was discussed by Edmonds (1956, p, 284), They
resemble most closely Phascolasoma scalops
(Selenka and de Man) and to a less extent
Phascolosoma agassizii Keferstein, two very vari-
able species. Edmonds (1956) considered that they
differed from P, scolops (1) in the structure of the
papillae (they haye more uniformly distributed,
A REVISION OF TRE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCULA) 63
more closely set and rounded platelets) and (2) in
the possession of a rectal caecum, a structure neither
mentioned or figured by Selenka in the type
description nor by Sato (1930) nor Wesenberg-Lund
(1957) in their descriptions of specimens from Japan
and Red Sea, There are two specimens of P. scolops
in the Nat, Hist. Museum, London, both named and
presented by Selenku. No caecum is present in the
dissected specimen of the two, Just haw important is
the presence of absence of a rectal caecum in the
systematics of Phascolosoma I am not sure. In the
circumstances [| prefer ta specify (with some
reservations) the specimens [rom Western Australia
as P. rottnestij and not P. scolaps,
From figs. 3 and § of Fischer, 1922 it seems likely
his P. agassi2ii from Shark Bay and Rottnest Is, are
P) rotmesi. | have not, however, been able to find
his Specimens
The species is commonly found in limestone
rocks. coral and lithothamnion and coralline mats.
Previous Australian record; Western Australia
(Edmonds, 1956), 7 Fischer, 19194 and 1922,
Distribution. (1) in Australia—Western Australia;
as far north as Point Cloates and as far south as
Albany, Whether these localities are at the
extremities of its distribution is not known.
(2) elsewhere—no records,
Specimens examined and localities: Western
Austraha—Fremantle (3) “in calcareous rocks near
railway bridge’’ SAM E1367; Rottnest Is. (Wilson
Bay) (4) WAM 174/76, Rottnest Is. (Green Is,) (20)
WAM 169/76 and (8) SAM E1368; Cottesloe (4)
SAM E1369; Pt. Peron (2) WAM 180/76; Garden Is,
(1) WAM 234/76; Abrolhos Group at Beacon Is, (2)
WAM 237/76 and North Is., ‘in coral’ (2) WAM
241/76; Yallingup Beach (2) AMS W9246; Cheyne
Beach, Albany (2) WAM 239/76; Eagle Bay, Cape
Naturaliste (2) WAM 174/76; Warroora (1) AMS
5470; Point Cloates (3) SAM E1370.
Phascolosoma scolops (Selenka & de Man)
(Figs 122-3)
Phiviniosama scolaps Sclenka & de Man, 1883, pp.
75-7. figs 17, 138-144) Cutler. 1977, p. 152,
Phascolosoma dunwichi Edmonds, 1956, pp, 292-3,
text figs 12-13: Stephen & Edmonds, 1972. pp.
300-401.
Location of type, Not known to author; specimen
from Philippines.
Description: Trunk 15-34 mm long and maximum
width (in posterior third) 3-6 mm light brown except
at anterior and posterior extermities which ate dark-
brown, Introvert of fixed specimens. about as long as
trunk with @ variable number of dark-brown bands
on dorsal surface. Tentacles 15-20 and digitiform,
lying in a near ring dorsal to mouth. Surface of
introvert just pasterior to mouth smooth and collar-
like,
Introvert hooks in [5-45 complete and incomplete
rows, closely resembling those of Phascolosoma
scolops as shown in fig 139 of Selenka & de Man
(1883), Size of hook may vary in different
specimens, smallest being 0-045 mm tall and largest
0-064 mm. Clear streak (running from apex to base
of hook) (1) does not always form a uniform are but
may be bent in its middle (much like an Australian
boomerang) and (2) is sometimes expanded at or
just below bend. Most hooks with a small
“secondary tooth’, something not shown in
Selenka's fig 139. A clear triangular area present on
one side of clear streak at base af hook but lacking
the clear crescentric area as found in P, stephensoni,
Papillae between hooks small, flat, circular to
elliptical with diameter 0:02-0:03 mm. Papillae at
base of introvert darker, cancical (sometimes
sharply) to hemispherical, consisting of an apical
pore surrounded by almast contiguous, polygonal
plates af about equal size. Papillae on trunk largest
and most closely packed at anterior and posterior
extremities, particularly on dorsal side; 0.2-0-35 mm
tall and 0-:2-0:3 mm wide. Papillae in nmd-trunk
region smaller, more scattered and less pointed. In
Some specimens. number of papillae on middle and
posterior surfaces may be reduced
Longitudinal muscles in 20-25 anastomosing bands
often clearly visible through body wall, Four
retractors, a Stout ventral pair atrached to muscles 2-
7, 1-6 or 2-6 in posterior half of irunk and a more
slender dorsal pair more anteriorly to muscles 6-7, 5-
7 or 6-8, Retractors on each side fuse anteriarly.
One fastener runs from muscle 1 near base of left
dorsal retractor to last spiral of intestine, sometimes
giving a root to posterior oesophagus. Wing muscle
well-developed, Spindle muscle fastened anteriorly
near anus and posteriorly to body wall. Rectal
caecum not present. Contractile vessel simple.
Nephridia brown, about quarter to half as long as
trunk, fixed for about half their length and opening
at about same level as anus. Two cyespots present.
Systematie position: Edmonds (1956, p, 292)
identified some specimens from Dunwich as P.
dunwichi a new species allied to P. scolops, The main
differences were that P. dunwichi possessed a
caecum and that there were some differences in the
size and distribution of the platelets of the papillae,
More recently I have re-examined the specimens and
consider that a caccum is not present. TI must have
mistaken a small outpocketing of the gut wall
66 REC, S, AUST. MUS. 18 (1):
containing some hard food particles for a caecum. In
addition the size and distribution of the platelets of
some of the newer specimens in my collection
approach more closely those of the two specimens of
P. scolops (named by Selenka) now in the Natural
History Museum, London, The differences then
between P. scolops and P. dunwichi then become
insignificant and the latter becomes a junior
synonym of the former.
What the distribution of the species is in Australia
is not known. Very few phascolosomatids from
northern and north-western Australia are available
for study. However, all the specimens of P, rottnestii
from south-west Australia that I have examined do
possess a well-developed caecum,
ATI
oi,
Ov?
——— a-O5
1-74 January, 1980
Superficially P. scolops and P. stephensoni are
almost indistinguishable. The crescentic-shaped
clear area present on the hook of P. stephensoni,
however, is not present in P. scolops.
Previous Australian records: Queensland—Ed-
monds (1956); Monro (1931). Cutler (1977) reports
one specimen off South Australia.
Distribution: (1) in Australia—Queensland.
(2) elsewhere—widely reported from the Indo-
Pacific.
Specimens examined and localities: Queensland
—Dunwich (on Stradbroke Is.) (1) in clumps of
mussels SAM E1339; (3) SAM E1340: (6)
SAM E1341.
FIGS. 117-129, Figs. 117-119, Phascolosoma perlucens; 117, complete specimen: 118, spine-like papillae from base of introvert (Figs.
117 & 118 after Fisher); 119, introvert hook, Figs. 120-121, Phascolosama pacificum; 120, introvert hook; 121, papilla from
introvert. Figs, 122-123, Phascolosoma scolopss 122, introvert hook: 123, trunk papilla. Figs. 124-126, Phascolosonia rotmesti: 124,
dissected specimen, 125, introvert hook; 126, trunk papilla (same seale as Fig. 123), Figs. 127-129, Phascolosonia stephensoni; 127,
intravert hook; 128, trunk papilla; 129, hook from one of Stephen's specimens.
4 REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCULA) 67
Phascolosoma (Pascolosama) stephensoni (Stephen)
(Figs. 127-129)
Physcosoma stephensoni Stephen, 1942, p. 25(), pl.
11, figs 3-5.
Phascolosoma stephensont; Wesenberg-Lund. 1963:
pp. 121-126, text figs 7-9.
Phascolosoma heronis Edmonds, 1956, pp, 293-295,
fig. 14,
Physcosoma scalops: Monro, 1931, p, 31.
? Physcosoma agassizti: Fischer, 1922, p 7, pl. 1,
fig. 4,
Location of type: Royal Scottish Museum, Edin-
burgh; specimen from Natal, South Africa.
Deseriptian: This account is based oan the
specimens below and a collection from Hawati
(SAM E1176). Trunk slender, 1.5-3.5 mm long and
pale-straw to flesh coloured. Introvert of fixed
animals about as long as. trunk, with 3-9 brown ta
red-black bands of variable width on its dorsal
surface. Closely packed pigmenied papillae make
base of introvert darker than surface of trunk, Rust
coloured patches present in some places on trunk,
Trunk of some Hawaiian specimens uniformly pale
although some large papillae present posteriorly.
Introvert with almost complete ring of 20-24
digitiform tentacles lying dorsal to mouth and with a
smooth, collar-like region just posterior to mouth.
Introvert hooks in many complete and incomplete
rows. may vary in size even when taken trom same
animal, those more posteriorly placed being smaller,
Hook always possesses a clear streak (running from
apex to base), a clear erescentic area on ane side of
streak and a clear triangular area on other, a small
secondary “tooth” and 4-6 bars hasi-laterally, Rings
of very small, subconical papillae, 0:02-0-04 men tall
and 0-025-0-05 mm wide basally, lie between rows of
hooks.
Trunk papillae al posterior extremity of trunk
usually conical, 0-3-0-5 mm tall and 0-25-0-4 mm
wide basally, but sometimes a more rounded form is
present as Well. Conical form covered with small,,
brown polygonal plates but rounded form lacking
small plates and possessing a number of curved
petal-like plates radiating from an apical pore, It ts
possible that the rounded type is. the result of the loss
of the outer polygonal plates from the conical type,
Papillae on dorsal surface largest. Mid-trunk
papillae smaller, hemispherical, Jess pigmented and
more scattered.
Longitudinal muscles in 20-25 anastamosing
bands. Four retractors. a stouter ventral pair
attached to muscles 1-5, 2-6, 2-7 or 2-8 near middle
of trunk and a more slender dorsal pair more
anteriorly to 5-8, 4-7 or 6-8, One fastening muscle,
attached to muscle 1 near base ol left dorsal
retractor, runs to last spiral of intestine, sometimes
giving off a small reat to posterior oesophagus
Rectal caecum present (dissected specimens
SAM E1373 and E1531). Stephen in the type
description did not mention the presence or absence
of the structure, Wesenberg-Lund (1963. p. 124)
states with emphasis that no rectal caecum i$
present. Dr. G. Smaldon (Royal Scottish Museum),
however, informs me (personal communication) that
a caecim is present in Stephen’s dissected holotype.
Cantractile vessel without vill. Nephridia, about a
third as long us trunk and fixed for about half their
length, arise at about same level as anus.
Systematic position: PF, heronis was deserihed by
Edmonds (1956) from some Specimens collected at
Heron Is. in the Capricorn Group, Queensland.
Wesenberg-Lund (1963, p, 126) pointed out that the
hooks of P, heranis closely resembled those of P-
Stephensoni (Stephen. 1942) from South Africa.
Through the kindness of the Trustees of the Royal
Scottish Museum | have been able to examine three
of Stephen's specimens from Inhaca, Mozambique
(1960.48.14), one a dissected specimen. J now
consider that the two species are conspecific,
Stephen's having priority, The hooks of the South
African and Australian specimens are the same.
although slightly different in size, and the papillae of
Stephen's specimens are covered with fine plates,
something not mentioned by him but reported for
her South African specimens by Wesenberg-Lund
(1963), Tam grateful to the late Dr. Wesenberg
Lund tor her observations. Phascolosoma heronis
must be sunk.
It seems most likely that Fischer's (1922) record of
P, agassizti from “Port Jackson near Sydney” is that
of P. stephensoni; the drawing of the hook (pl. 1, fiz
6) matches that of the latter species. Fischer's fig 6,
however, in my opinion, differs from the books of P.
agassizji as shown in plates 37 and 38 of Fisher,
1952. What I am now calling P. stephensomti is. widely
distributed in the Pacific Ocean, I have specimens
from Hawaii, New Hebrides, Solomon Is.,.and Fiji.
It js puzzling to know what name has been given to
such specimens previously, ] do not think that they
are P. scolops because 4 re-examination of two
specimens named by Selenka himself and now
lodged in the British Museum (Nat. Hist) shows thal
the hooks Jack the clear, crescentic area which is so
prominent in P. srephensoni. The introvert hook of
P, fasciatum Baird, 1868 as shown in fig 17 of Rice &
Stephen (1970) also possesses a clear crescentic area,
The current name of P. fasciatum is P. granulatun
(Leuckart), I consider, however, that the hook of
68 REC. 8. AUST. MUS. 18 (1):
these Australian specimens does not match that of P.
granulatum as shown in Selenka & de Man (1883, fig
147).
Stephen considered that the distribution of P.
stephensoni was localised along the coast of Natal
(Wesenberg-Lund, 1963 p. 126). The occurrence of
the species in Australia, Norfolk Is., Hawaii, etc.
shows that its range is Indo-Pacific. What is difficult
to account for is that it has not yet appeared
anywhere else in the Indian Ocean nor on the
western coast of Australia. In Australia, Hawaii and
the Solomon Is, it is usually associated with coral
formations.
The species differs from closely related species in
the markings on its hooks.
Previous Australian record: Queensland—Heron
Is., Low Is. (Edmonds, 1956).
1 SS. indicus °
2 S. robustus e
3° § titubans r?)
4 X,mundanus +
§ S.cumanense Vv
6 S. vastum v
7 S. australe 2)
8 S. boholense @®
9 S.novaepommeraniaea
10 §. rotumanum &
1-74 January, 1980
Distribution: (1) in Australia—Queensland; New
South Wales; Norfolk Is., Lord Howe Is.
(2) elsewhere—South Africa; Hawaii (SAM
E1376-7); Solomon Is,
Specimens examined and localities: Queensland
—Caloundra (5) SAM E1372 and (1) AMS W19550;
Low Is. (3) SAM E1374; Albany Passage (North
Queensland) (2) AMS G11224; Heron Is. (3) AMS
W3597 (includes type of P. heronis) and (2) WAM
150/76; Norfolk Is. (2) SAM E1378. New South
Wales—off Coff’s Harbor (10) SAM E1373; Minnie
Waters (2) AMS W9247; Lennox Head (6) AMS
W10552; Arrawarra (2) AMS W10555; Lord Howe
Is. (2) SAM E1375; Lord Howe Is. (Salmon Beach)
(6) SAM E1531.
SIPUNCULIDAE
130
FIG. 130. Distribution of Sipunculidae in Australia.
.Margaritacea adelaidensis ©
.misakiana
. Schuettei
QDNHADDADRDADHAD
.trichocephala-a
AA ADHD VN VD
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCULA) 69
.coriacea y
_herdmani e fa
improvisa ° MO
minuta °
murinae murinae
ohlini
pellucida
semperi
.VulgariS queens. A
. collare >
. cronullae + GOLFINGIIDAE
dentalicolum v
pacificum x T. huttoni oO ©
cymodoceae 9% T. lageniformis ° Q
.dehamata 9 T. variospinosa co)
. fusca v O. steenstrupii &
FIG. 131. Distribution of Golfingiidae in Australia.
70 REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18 (1): 1-74 January, 1980
A,elegans
A,exhaustus
A. inquilinus
A.hartmeyeri
A. gracilis
A. jukesii
P, cumingi
P, formosanus
OMAN DOO FW p=
q~4a-PePP0gmgQ0 @O0O
P. steenstrupii
o8
10 P johnstoni 4 ASPIDOSIPHONIDAE
11 C.aspergillus
12 L.cristatus
oo
132
FIG. 132. Distribution of Aspidosiphonidae in Australia.
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCULA) 7
,albolineatum
| annulatum
arcuatum
nigrescens
. nigritorqatum
noduliferum
. pacificum
NOonf® WN =
ua UU DU
> @e@ooese Ce
> @peg
Og
v *O
0
ev o
le t
©
o
o
B P perlucens A
9 Prottnesti v
10 PR, scolops v
11 Pp stephensoni 0)
133
FIG, 133. Distribution of Phascolosomatidae in Australia.
REFERENCES
AKESSON, B, 1958. A study of the mervous system of the
Sipunculoideae, with some remarks on the development of
the two species Phascolion strombi (Montagu) and Golfingia
minuta (Keferstein). (In) Undersdkningar éver Oresund, 38
Lund, C. W. K. Gleerup, 249 pp.
AMOR, A, 1964. El genero Dendrostomum (Stpunculida) en Ja
Argentina. Physis, 24 (68); 457-470, 5 figs.
AUGENER, H. 1903, Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Gephyreen
nach Untersuchung der im Géttinger zoologischen Museum
befindlichen Sipunculiden und Echiuren, Arch. Naturgesch.
69: 297-371, pls. 16-20.
BAIRD, W. B. 1868. Monograph on the species of worms
belonging to the subclass Gephyrea. Proc. zool. Soc. London:
76-114, pls. 9-11,
BAIRD, W, B. 1873. Descriptions of some new species of
Annelida and Gephyrea in the collections of the British
Museum. J. Linn, Soc. (Zool.) 11: 94-97.
BENHAM, W. B. 1903. The sipunculids of New Zealand. Trans.
Proc, N.Z. Inst, 36: 172-184, 4 pls.
BENHAM, W. B. 1904, Further notes on the sipunculids from
New Zealand. Trans. Proc. N.Z. Inst, 37: 301-308, 2 pls.
BLAINVILLE, H. M. D. de, 1827. Dictionnaire des sciences
naturelles. Vers. 49: 305-313.
BOSS, K, J. 1965. Symbiotic Erycinacean bivalves. Malacologia3
(2): 183-195.
BOUVIER, E. L. 1895, Le commensalisme chez certaines
polypes madreporaires. Annis, Sci. nat. Zool, 20: 1-32.
CHAMISSO, A. de, and Eysenhardt, C. G. 1821, De animalibus
quibusdam e classe vermium linneana, Nova Acta Acad.
Caesar Leop. Carol, 10: 343-374.
CHIN, T. G. 1947. Studies of Fukien Sipunculoidea. Biol. Bull.
Fukien Christian Univ. 3: 97-104.
CHIN, T, G. and WU, C. §. 1950, Diatoms in the intestine of
Amoy sipunculids (Annelida, Gephyrea), The food of
Sipunculida. Lingnan Sci. J. 23; 43-53,
CUTLER, E. B. 1969. New species of Sipuncula from the
Western North Atlantic, Prac, biol, Soc. Wash. 82: 209-218.
CUTLER, E. B. 1973. Sipuncula of the Western North Atlantic.
Bull. Amer. Mus. nat. Hist. 152 (3): 103-204, figs. 1-59,
tables 1-13,
CUTLER, E. B. 1977. The bathyl and abyssal Sipuncula,
Galathea Rep. 14: 135-156, 13 figs.
CUTLER, E. B. and JURCZAK, E. 1975. The sipunculan genus
Lithacrosiphon Shipley, A taxonomic review. Zool. J. Linn.
Soc. 56, 235-248. 3 figs.
CUTLER, E. B, and MURINA, V. V. 1977. On the sipunculan
genus Golfingia Lankester, 1885. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 60 (2):
173-187.
DAKIN, W, J, 1952. Gephyrea. (In) Australian seashores: 157-
158. Angus and Robertson, Sydney.
DANIELSSEN, D. C. 1869. Sipunculus norvegicus. Ford. skand.
Nauirf. Kristiana Méte. 10, 541-542.
DIESING, C. M, 1851,
Vindobonae.
Systema helminthum. 2: 1-588.
72 REC. S. ALIST. MUS, 18 (1):
DIESING, C. M. 1859. Revision der Rhyngodeen, Sher, Akad,
Wiss. Wien. 37: 719-782, 3 pls,
DITADI, A. S. F. 1975. Aspidosiphon schnehageni (Siptneutta)
inhabiting Tornatina shells, Veliger TS (2): 200-202-
EDMONDS, 8. J. 1955. Austrahan Sipunculoidea f. The genera
Sipunculus,. Xenosiphon and Siphonosoma. Aust. Jo mar.
Freshwat. res. 6: 82-97, 1 pl., 9 figs,
EDMONDS, S$. J. 1956, Australian Sipunculoidea 2, The geners
Phascolosoma, Dendrostomum, Golfingia, Aspidosiphon and
Dranaphan Aust, J, mar. Freshwat. res. 7; 218-318, 3 pls. 2)
igs.
EDMONDS, §& J, 1957a. The respiratary metabolism of
Dendrostomum cymvdoceae Edmonds (Sipunculoides).
Aust J. mun, Preshwar, res, 8: 53-63,
EDMONDS, S. J. 1957b. The catabolism of nitrogen compounds
in Dendrostonium cymodoceae Edmonds (Sipunculoidea).
Aus, J. mar, Freshwat. res. 8; 131-135
EDMONDS §. J. 1960. Sipunculids from New Zenland and the
Chatham Islands, N, 2. Dept. Sci Industr, res. Bull, 139%; 1S9-
167, 3 pls, 8 figs.
EDMONDS, 8. J, 1961. On Sipunculits aeneus Baird. Ann, Mag.
nul. Fist, (13) 4: 217-220,
EDMONDS, S. J, 1966, Siphonosoma hawaiense. a new
sipanculid from Hawaii. Pacific Sci. 20 (3): 386-388.
EDMONDS, §, J. 1971, Some sipunculans and éechiurans chiefly
from Guam (Sipuncula and Echiura), Micronesica 7: 137-151.
EDMONDS, §. J, 1976, Three sipunculan species (two new) from
New Zealand. N. Z. J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 10 (1): 217-224.
EDWARDS, M, and HAIME, J. 1848a, Reelrerches sur les
polypiers. Il, Monographie des Turbinolides, Ann, Sev,
Natur, (Ser. 3, Zool.) 9: 211-344,
EDWARDS, M. and HAIME, | 1848b. Recherches sur les
polypiers Ill. Monographie des Eupsammides. Ann. Sei.
Namur. (Ser. 3, Zool.) 10: 65-114,
FISCHER, W, 1895, Die Gephyréen des Naturhistorschen
Museums zu Haotburg. Abhandl, d. naturrwis, Vereins,
Hamb. 13; 1-24. 1 pl
FISCHER, W. 1913 Ober einige sipunculiden des naturhistons-
chen Museums zu Hamburg. Jb. Hainh. wiss, Ansr. 30: 93-
11.
FISCHER, W. 1914. Weitere Mitteilungen Gber dic Gephyreen
des naturhistorischen Muscums zu Hamburg, Mitr narurh.
Mus. Hamb, 31; 1-28
FISCHER, W, 1919a. Gephyreen der sudwestkuste ausiraliens
Zool, Anz, 50: 277-285. figs 1-6,
FISCHER, W. 1919b. ther die Gattung Lithacrasiphon, eine
neue Sipunculiden-Gattung Zool. Anz, $0: 289-293, 5 figs.
FISCHER, W, 1921, Results of Dr. E, Mjobere’s Swedish
scientific expeditions to Australia 1910-1913, 27, Gephyreen.
K. svenska Vetensk.-Akad. Handl. 61 (8): 1-8, 6 figs,
FISCHER, W 1922. Gephyreen des Reichmuseums zu
Stockholm. Ark, Zool. 14 (19): 1-39, pl. 1-3. figs 1-42.
FISCHER, W, 1926. Sipunciliden und Echiuriden der
Hamburger Siidsee-Expedition 1908-1904, Mir. zool,
Siaatins!, und. Zool, Mus. Hamb. 42; 104-117, pl. 3, figs 5, 7-
13.
FISCHER, W. 1927. Sipunculoidea und Echiuroidea, (Inj Die
Fauna Stidwes-Ausiraliens Sz 199-216, pl, 2, fips 1-7,
FISCHER. W_ 1928. Uber zwei neue Siphonosoma—Arten der
Wurtemburgischen naturalien Sammlung Zu Stuttparl- Zool.
Anz. 76: 138-143, 2 figs.
FISHER. W. K 1947. New genera and species of echiuroid and
sipunculoid worms. Proc U.S. natn. Mus., 97: 351-372, pls 8-
15.
FISHER, W. K. 1950a, The new subgenera and a new species ot
Siphonosama (Sipunculoidea), Ann. Mag, nat. Hist. (12) 3:
405-808, 1 pl.
FISHER, W. K, 1950b, The sipuneuld genus Phascolosomy,
Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (12) 3: 547-552
1-74 Jaithary, TMs
FISHER, W. K. 1952. The sipunculid worms of California and
Baja Californi, Proc. U.S. nan. Mus 102; 371-450, pts 18-
34, 87 figs,
FISHER, W, K, 1984, The genus Nenosiphon Arn. Mag. tat
Hist, (12) 7: ALI-315, pls 7-8,
GARDINER, J, 8. The Maldive aqd Luecadive Groups. with
notes On other eoral formations in the Mndiin Ocean. The
Fauna and Geography of the Maldive and Luceadive
Archipehigoes, $; 333-341.
GEROULD, J, H. 1913 The sipunculids of the eusterm coast of
North Ameriea. Proc. U.S. natn, Mus: 44: 373-437, 16 figs.
pis 58-62
GIBBS, P, E, 1977, British sipunculans. Synopses of the Brinsh
fauna (New Series), No. 12: 1-35,
GIBBS. P, E_ 1978. Macrofauna of the Intertidal sand (lats on low
wooded istands, northern Great Barrier Reel. Philos. Trusts
Ray. Sac. (BY 184 81-97.
GOREAU, T. F, und YONGE, C. M. 1968, Coral community.on
muddy sand. Nanire 217, 42)-423,
GRAVELY, F_ H. 1927, The littoral launa of Krusadiai Islanels in
the Cralf of Manaar, Gephyred and Phoronis. Bull. Madras
Govl. Mus, U6: 395-402, 1 fig
GRAY, J, E, 1828, Spicilegia Zoologica (1); 1-8, London,
GREEN, A. WL. 1975. Annual repreduenve eyele of Phas-
colasoma lurea (Sipuncula). Prac. Int. Sympas. Biol.
Sipuncula & Echiura I: 161-168.
GREEN, J. P, & DUNN, D, F. 1976. Chloride and osmotic
balance in the euryhaline sipunculid Phascolosoma arcuarum
from a Malaysian mangrove swamp. Biol, Bull, 150: 21\-221-
GRUBE, E, 18684, Beschreibungen ciniger von Cr. Ritter von
Fraunfetd gesammellen Annelida und Gephyreen des rothen
Meeres, Verh. zoal-bot. Gey. Wien, 18: 629-650, pls 7-8.
GROUBE, E. l868b. Tatigheit der allgemeimen Narunwiss —sec-
tion der Schlesischen Gesellschalt im Jahre R66, Sher.
Schles. Ges, Walerl Kult, 453 47-49.
GROUBE, E, & OFRSTED, A. 5, 1858. Annulata verstedianne.
Vilensk, Meddr. dansk, Foren, 1858: 105-120 (Gephyres)
HARMS, J. Wo & DRAGENDOREF, O. 1933. Die Realisation
von Genen \ind die consecutive Adaptation, 3 Mitteilungen.
Osmolisthe Untersuchungen an Physeoseina lune. 2 wiss.
Zool, 3: 263-322,
HERUBEL, M. A. 1904, Liste des Sipunculides et des Behiurides
rapportées par M, Ch. Gravier du Golfe de Tudjourah. Bull
Mus, Hist. nul Paris. Us 562.565,
HUTTON, W. K, 1879. Additions to the jist of New Zealand
warms. Tris NZ Inst, 122 277-278,
HYMAN, 1. H. 1959, Phylum Sipunculidas, (In) The
Invertebrates. McGraw-Hill Book Company. N.Y. §:. 6Tf-
696, figs. 213-241,
IKEDA, 1, 1904, The gephyrea of Japan. J. Coll. Sei. imp. Unie.
Tokyo 20 (4); 1-87, 4 pls.
JOHNSON, P, 1964, Two species of Aspidosiphon (Sipun-
culoidea). Afn. Mag. nat. Hist. (13) 7: 331-335, pls 7-8.
JOHNSON, FP, 1969. A new subgenus ol Nenosiphon
(Sipunculoidea) and description of a new species from Indian
waters. J. Bomb. tliat. Hist. Soc. 66 (1): 43-46. figs. 1-7
JONES, 1. 19754. The occurrence of some intestinal and coclomic
parasiles of Phascolosema varians ol Puerto Rico. Proc, Pal.
Sympos. Biol, Sipuncula & Echiura 1: 343-348,
JONES, 1 1975b. Further studies on the distribution and
morphology of intestinal sparozoa af Phascalosoma ant
sera Prov. Int. Sympos. Biol, Sipuncula & Eehiura 1; 349-
355.
KEFERSTEIN, W. 18063. Beitriige zur Kenntnis der Gatting
Phascolosoma FS. Leuckart Untersuchungen tiber niedere
Seethiere, Z wis. Zool, 12: 35-51, pls. 3-4.
KEFERSTEIN. W, J865. Beitrige “ur anatonisehen und
systematischen Kenninis der Sipunculiden. 2, wiss, Zan{. 15:
404-445, pls 31-33,
A REVISION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF AUSTRALIAN SIPUNCULANS (SIPUNCUL.A) 7
KREFERSTEIN, W866 Untersuchungen iiber einige
amerikanischen Sipuncuhden, Nachr. Ges. wiss, Gormmgen
1866; 1-15
KEFERSTBIN, W. 1867. Untersuchungen uber einige
amerikanischen Sipunculiden, 2. wiss Amol. 17: 44-55.
KESTEVEN, HL. 1903. A new species of Dendrostoma. Ree.
Aust, Mus. 3: 69-73, 1 pl,
RON, A J J970. Food habits af the gastropod Mitra litterata
Lammurck. Pacific Sei 24: 483-486,
ROUN, A, J 1975_ Predanor on sipunculans, Proc, Internat,
Syap. Biul Sipuncwta & Echiura 1 Kotor; 373-332,
KOREN, J., and DANIELSSEN. D. ©. 1875, Bidrag til de
uniske Gephyreers Naturhistone. Nw. Mag, Naturvid, 22-
18-138.
KOREN. J, and DANTFLSSEN. D, C. 1877. Contributions to
the natural history of the Norwegian Crephyrea, (Tn) Sars M-
Fauna (nroralis Norwegrae, Christiana 3: 14 )-15f. pis. 14-18.
fing. 18-46, Bergen.
LANKESTER, FR J&KS, Golfingia macinteshi, a new
srpunculid from the coast of Scotland, Trans. Linn. See,
Lond. Zoe! (2) 11; 469-474, pls, 55-356,
LELCKART. F. 8. 1828. Breves animalium quorumdam maxima
parte marinorum descriptiones, Heidelberg; 9-23,
LINNAEUS, C, 1766, Systema nature, 12 ed.
MANWEIL. C. 1977) Superoxide dismutase and NADH
didphoruse in haemerythroeytes of sipunculans. Comp,
Biochem Physiol S& Bo 331-338,
METALNIROFF, S.J. 1900, Sipuneulus nudus, 2. wiss. Zool,
68) 2) -422
MONEKO. C. A. 1931. Polvehaetn, Echiuroides and Sipun-
culoidea, Scien, Rep Gt Barrier Reef Exped. 4: 1.37.15 figs,
MONTAGU, G, 1804, Deserjptions of several marine animals
found on (he south coast of Devanshire Trans. Linn. See,
Lundon. 72 61-85.
MURINA, V. V. 1957a. Sipunculids collected on the first trip of
the Antarctic Expedition of the "Ob" in 1956, Zool, Zhurn,
a6- 992-906),
MURINA, VV, 1957b, Abyssal sipunculids (genus Phascolion)
of the Horth-western part of the Pacific Ocean collected hy
the “Vigae’ Expedition in 1980-1955, Zool. Zhurn. 36: 1777-
174)
MURINA, VV J058 On the systematics of wo closely relared
species of deep-water sipunculids of the genus Golfingia.
wecording to the taarerials of the “Vinue” Expeditions in
1949-1955. Zoal Ahum. 37 1624-1634. 1 fig.
MURINA, Vo V. 1¥6dia, New and rure species of sipunculids of
the genus Golfingia. Trrdy Inst) Okeanol. Akad. nauk
USSR, 69 216-253,
MURINA, VV, 1964b. On (he sipunculid fauna of the
Mediterranean Sea, Trudy sevasropel Mol. Star. 172 51-76, 20
figs,
MURINA_V. V, 1967. Report on the sipunculid worms from the
sublittoral zone of Cub and the Mexicun Gulf. Zoal, Zhurn.
46: 1229,1339_ 6 figs.
MURINA, Y. V. 1968, New discovenes from the fauna of Cuha
and the Gulf of Mexico Ree Rawy, Biol. Zoolovie 13 (6):
421-423,
MURINA, Vo V_ 1969. Two new species of sipuncuhds from (he
Pacitie and Indian Oceans. Zool. Zhurn. 48: 1732-1734,
MURINA, VV 7970. Contributions to the fauna of sspunculid
worms from the Gulf of Aden, Vestnik Zeol. 22 65-72,
MURINA, Vo Vo 1971. On the oceurrence of deep-sea
sipunculids and priapolids in the Kurile-Kamechalka Trench
Trudy Insti, Qeeanol.. 92; 41-14
MURINA, VW. V_ 1972. Contributions to the knowledge of the
sipunculid fuunw of the southern hemisphere. (In)
Researches in Murine Fauna (Issledevani fauni morei) XT
(XTX); 294-314,
MURINA, V, V. 1973. Sipunculids from the Peruvian-Chilean
Trench Vesinik Zool.. S: 66-71,
MURINA, V. V. 1974. Contributions to the knowledge of the
fauna of Sipunculid worms from the sourh Atuntic based on
the data of the ~Academic Kurchatov’ Expedition of 1971
Trudy Instr, Qeranul. 98; 228-239.
MURINA, VV, 1975u. New taxa of the genus Gulfingia, Zool,
Zhen, S42 JO85-1088,
MURINA, V, V, [975b. The evolution and the phylogeny of the
Sipunculids, Zool, Zhurn. $4; 1747-1758.
MURINA. VV. 1977. Marine Worms. Sipunculans of the Arcti¢
and boreal waters of Eurasia. Opredéliteh po Faune SSSR,
111: 1-282. Adad Nak SSSR, Leningrad.
PALLAS. P, 8. 1774. Spicilegia Zonlogies Berolint (1) 10: 1-15,
4 pls
PEEBLES. Found FOX, BD. L 1933. The structure, functions and
general reaebons of the marine sipunculid worn
Dendrasioma zostericola, Bull, Scripps Instn. Oceanogr veeh
ser, 3: .2(0)1-223, 11 figs,
PFRGAMENT. T. 8. 1946, On a new genus and little known
sipunculids from the northern Arctic Ocean. Trudy Exped,
edou'’, Moscow-Leningrad, 3: 189-193,
PETERS, W. 1850, Uber dic Fortpflaneungorgane des
Sipuncilus, Areh. ana plrysiol. W505 382-5, pl. 4, figs La-b
QUATREFAGES, A. de. 1865, Histoire naturelle des Anneldés
marine et d'eau douce, Paris, 2: 1-794, pls 1-20.
RICE, M, E. 1969, Possible boring struenires ol sipunculids
Anier, 4ool. 95 803-812.
RICE. M, E. i97). Observations on the development of six
species of Caribbean Sipuneula with a review of development
in the phylum. Proc, Intern, Sympos, Biol. of Sipuncula and
Fchiura 1 Kotor: td 1-160,
RICE. M. BE. 1973 Morphology. behaviour and histogenesis of
the pelagosphera larva of Phascolosama agassizij. Smithson.
Contrib. Zool, 1322 1-49,
RICE, M, EF, 1976, Sipunculans associated with
communities, Micronesica 12 (1)) 119-132,
RICE, M. B- and MacINTYRE, 1], G. 1972. A preliminary study
ot sipunculan barrows in rack thin sections, Carib, J, Scj., 12:
41-44.
coral
RICE, M. E, and STEPHEN, A, C. 1970, The type specimens af
Sipuncula and Echiura described by J, E. Gray and W
Baird, Bull. Bri Mus. (Nat, Hist.) Zoology 20 (2): 47-72, 3
pls.
SATO. H_ 1930. Report ou the biological survey of Mutsu Bay
15, Sipuneculoidea, Sei Rep. Tohoku Cnin (4) 5; 1-40.
SATO, H. 1935. Sjpunculoidea and Echiuroidea of the Wesr
Caroline Islands, Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ, (4) 10: 299-329, ply
v4
SATO, H. 1937. Echiuroidea, Sipunctiloidea and Priapuloidea
obrained in North-West Honshu, Res. Bill Saita-Ho-oy Kai
Mus. (Zool) 12: 137-176, 3 pls, 14 figs.
SATO, H. 1939. Studies on the Echiuroides, Sipunculoidea and
Priapuleidea of Japan, Sei, Rep. Tohoku Uy iv. (4) 141 339
460), pls 19-23, 60 figs.
SEDGWICK, A, 7898. A student's textbook of Zoology. 1 Swann
Sonnenschein. London.
SELENKA, E., MAN, J. de, and BOLOW, C. 1883 Die
Sipunculiden Reisen im Archipel Philippinen von Dr .C-
Semper, Leipsig & Wiesbaden, p. 2, 4 (1)> 1-143, 14 pls:
SHIPLEY, A, E, 1898. Report on the gephyrean worms collected
by Mr. Stunley Gardiner at Rotuma and Funafual. Proe zaol
Sac. London, 1898: 486-473, pl. 47, figs. 1-2
SHIPLEY. A. EF. 1899, A repart on the Sipunculoidea collected
by Dr. A. Willey at the Loyalty Islands and in New Britain,
(In) A. Willey, Zool Res. 2: 151-160, pl. 18.
74 REC. 8, AUST. MUS. 18 (1):
SHIPLEY, A. E. 1902. Sipunculoidea, with an account of a new
genus Lithacrosiphon. (In) Gardiner, J. S., Fauna and
Geography of the Maldive and Laccadive Archipelagoes. 1:
131-140, pl. 7,
SHIPLEY, A. E. 1903, Report on the Gephyrea collected by
Prof. Herdman at Ceylon in 1902, Herdman Rep. Pearl
Oyster Fishery, 1 (3) suppl.: 169-176, 1 pl., figs. 4-10.
SLUITER, C. P. 1882. Beitrage zur der Kenntniss der Gephyreen
aus dem Malayischen Archipel. Naturrk. Tijkschr. Ned.
Indie. 41: 148-171, 2 pls.
SLUITER, C. P. 1886, Beitriige zu der Kenntniss der Gephyreen
aus dem Malayischen Archipel. Naturrk. Tijdschr. Ned.
Indie. 45: 472-517, pls. 1-4.
SLUITER, C. P. 1902. Die Sipunculiden und Echiuriden der
Siboga-Expedition. Siboga Exped. (Monographie) 25: 1-53.
SLUITER, C. P, 1912. Gephyriens provenant des campagnes de
la Princesse Alice. 1898-1910. Result. Camp. scient. Prince
Albert I, 36: 1-36, pl. 1, figs. 1-21.
SPENGEL, J. W. 1912. Einige Organisationverhaltnisse von
Sipunculus-Arten und die Bedeutung fur die Systematik
dieser Tiere. Verh. dtsch. zool. Ges., 22: 261-272,
STEPHEN, A. C. 1942. Notes on the intertidal sipunculids of
Cape Province and Natal, Ann. Natal Mus., 10: 245-256, pl.
STEPHEN, A. C. 1964. A revision of the phylum Sipuncula.
Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., (13) 7: 457-462.
STEPHEN, A. C., and EDMONDS, S. J. 1972. The phyla
Sipuncula and Echiura. Trustees Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.)
London, 528 pp.
STEPHEN, A. C... and ROBERTSON, J. 1952. A preliminary
report on the Echiuridae and Sipunculidae of Zanzibar. Proc,
R. Soc. Edinb, 64, B22: 426-444.
STIMPSON, W. 1855, Descriptions of some new marine
invertebrates from the Chinese and Japanese seas.
Gephyrea. Proc, Acad. nat. Sci, Philad., 7: 390-391.
TARIFENO, E., and TOMICIC, J. 1973. Primer registro en el
Pacifico sur Oriental para Xenosiphon mundanum mun-
danum (Selenka, de Man & Bulow, 1883). Rev. Biol. mar,
Valparaiso, 15 (1): 107-110, 1 fig.
1-74 January, 1980
THEEL, H. 1875, Recherches sur le Phascolion (Phascolosoma)
de (Montagu). Bih. K. svensk. Vetensk. Akad. Handl. 3
3): 1-7.
THEEL, H. 1905. Northern and arctic inyertebrates in the
collection of the Swedish State Museum. Sipunculids. K.
svensk. Vetensk, Akad, Handl. 39: 1-130, pls. 1-15.
THEEL, H. 1911. Priapulids and sipunculids dredged by the
Swedish Antarctic Expedition 1901-1903, and the phenome-
non of bipolarity. K. svensk. Vetensk. Akad. Handl, 47: 1-
36, pls. 1-5, 8 figs.
TETRY, A, 1959, Classe des sipunculiens. (In) Grassé, Traité de
Zoologie 5 (1): 785-854, 1068-1081, figs. 575-673, 9-16 suppl.
WESENBERG-LUND, E. 1937. Gephyrea. Bull. Mus. r. Hist.
nat. Belg. 13 (36): 1-23, 10 figs.
WESENBERG-LUND, E. 1957. Sipunculoidea and Echiuroidea
foin the Red Sea. Bull, Sea Fish, Res. Stn. Israel, 14 (3): 1-
15.
WESENBERG-LUND, E. 1959a, Sipunculoidea and
Echiuroidea from tropical West Africa, Atlantide Rep. 5:
177-210, 16 figs.
WESENBERG-LUND, E. 1959b. Sipunculoidea and
Echiuroidea from Mauritius. Vidensk. Medd. fra Dansk.
naturh. Foren. 121: 53-73, 6 figs.
WESENBERG-LUND, E. 1963. South African sipunculids from
coastal waters. Vidensk. Medd. fra Dansk. naturh. Foren,
125: 101-146, figs. 1-12.
WHEELER, M. B. 1938. The Sir Joseph Banks Islands. Reports
of the expedition of the McCoy Society. Proc. R. Soc, Viet. 1
(50): 345.
WHITELEGGE, J. 1899. List of the marine and freshwater
invertebrate fauna of Port Jackson and neighbourhood. J,
Proc. R. Soc. N.S.W. 23: 163-323.
WILLIAMS, J. A. and MARGOLIS, S. V. 1974. Sipunculid
burrows in coral reefs: evidence for chemical and mechanical
excavation, Pacific Sci. 28 (4); 357-359.
YONGE, C. M. 1975. A note on mutualism between sipunculans
and scleractinian corals. Proc. Internat. Symp. Biol.
Sipuncula & Echiura Kotor I: 305-311.
RECORDS oF THE
SOUTH AUSTRALIAN
MUSEUM
VOLUME 18 NUMBERS 2—6 May, 1980
No. 2. THE DISTRIBUTION IN AUSTRALIA OF THE GRASS BUGS OF THE
TRIBE STENODEMINI (HETEROPTERA-MIRIDAE-MIRINAE)
by JOSE C. M. CARVALHO and GORDON F. GROSS
No. 3 TWO NEW GENERA OF THE SUBFAMILY PENTATOMINAE (HETER-
OPTERA: PENTATOMIDAE) FROM THE AUSTRALIAN REGION
by IMTIAZ AHMAD and NASEER AHMAD KHAN
No. 4 SOME REMARKS ON THE BREEDING DISTRIBUTION AND TAXON-
OMY OF THE PRIONS (PROCELLARIIDAE : PACHYPTILA)
by J. B. COX
No. 5 EVOLUTIONARY SYSTEMATICS OF XENYLLA: XI. SPECIES FROM THE
AUSTRALIAN REGION (INSECTA : COLLEMBOLA)
by MARIA MANUELA DA GAMA
No. 6 MACROPODID SKELETONS, INCLUDING SIMOSTHENURUS, FROM AN
UNUSUAL “DROWNED CAVE” DEPOSIT IN THE SOUTHEAST OF
SOUTH AUSTRALIA
by N. S. PLEDGE
SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM
North Terrace, Adelaide
South Australia 5000
THE DISTRIBUTION IN AUSTRALIA OF THE GRASS BUGS OF THE
TRIBE STENODEMINI (HETEROPTERA-MIRIDAE-MIRINAE)
BY JOSE C. M. CARVALHO AND GORDON F’. GROSS
Summary
The Stenodemini are represented in Australia by the three genera and species, Dolichomiris linearis
Reuter, 1882, Chaetedus longiceps Eyles, 1974 and Trigonotylus doddi (Distant, 1904).
A key is provided to separate these three species and figures and a brief diagnosis of each are given
to further assist in their recognition. Their known distribution in Australia is plotted on a map, and
in the case of the two less common species Dolichomiris linearis and Chaetodus longiceps, new
records to hand since the Eyles (1975) and Eyles & Carvalho (1975) revisions of the group are
given in detail.
THE DISTRIBUTION IN AUSTRALIA OF THE GRASS BUGS OF THE TRIBE STENODEMINI
(HETEROPTERA-MIRIDAE-MIRINAE)
by
JOSE C. M. CARVALHO! AND GORDON F. GROSS’
1. Museu Nacional. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
2. South Australian Museum, Adelaide, South Australia 5000-
ABSTRACT
CARVALHO, J. C. M, & GROSS, G, F., 1978, The distribution
in Australia of the grass bugs ot the tribe Stenodemini
(Heleroptera-Miridae-Mirinae) Rec, 5 Aust, Mus: 18(2); 75-42.
The Stenoderaini are represented in Australia by
the three genera and species, Dolichomiris linearis
Reuter. 1882, Chaeledus longiceps Eyles, 1974 und
Trigonotylus doddi (Distant, 1904).
A key is provided to separate these three species
and figures and a brief diagnosis of each are given to
further assist in their recognition. Their known
distribution ia Australia is plotted on a map, and in
the case of the two less common species Dolichamiris
linearis and Chaetodus longiceps, new records to
hand since the Eyles (1975) and Fyles & Carvalho
(1975) revisions of the group ure given in detail,
INTRODUCTION
The authors have in preparation a series ol papers
ia Which we shall attempt to give as complete an
account of the species of Miridae and their
distribution in Australia as is possible on the
material to hand in collections, with the exception of
the Bryocorinae and the non-mimetic Phylini which
have been entrusted to other authors.
In the paper which immediately preceded this
(Rec. S, Aust. Mus 17 (30): 000-000), though
covering the tribe Hyalopeplini of the subfamily
Miridae on a world basis, we were able to include all
revords and specimens of Australian material of that
group.
This paper deals with the allied tribe Stenodemini
in Australia, but it has been purposely kept short as
there have been two other recent contributions (vide
infra) on the taxonomy and distribution of the
Stenodemini in this general region.
Tribe Stenodemini
A small group of Miridae which was raised to
tribal rank in the subfamily Mirinae by China (1943),
This placement and ranking was accepted by
Carvalho (1952 and subsequent papers). The group
has subsequently been lowered to an unstated rank
in the Mirtnae by Schuh (1976) as a consequence of
his demotion of the subfamily Mirinae sensu
May, 1980
Carvalho to a tribe of an enlarged sublamily
Mirinaé. However, we propose fo retain the group
at its former rank for the time being.
The principal characters which taken together
distinguish this group from other Mirinae (sensu
Carvalho, or Mirini sensu Sehuh) are a rather
delicate appearance with the first segment of hind
tarsi longer than. (or as long as) the second and third
together, the antennae and legs relatively long and
the pronetal collar incomplete.
The group are grassfeeders, their elongate and
delicate shape presumably playing a role in
camouflage. Their small size and delicate stature, as
with a number of orher Heteroptera of similar size
and shape (c.f, Nabis species), appear to have
helped them ta be very vagile. They are known from
all googeographie regions with a number of genera
(e.g. Acelrapis Fieber, Collaria Provancher,
Dolichomiris Reuter, Leptapterna Fieber,
Mevaloceracu Fieber. Stenvdeme Laporte de Castel-
nau, Teratocoris Fieber and Trigonotylus Fieber) and
species (e.g. Dolichomiris linearis Reuter, Leptup-
rerma dolobrara (Linnaeus), Megaloceroed recticornis
Geotfroy, Stenodema [rixpingsumt Reuter.
Stenodema laevigatuim (Linnaeus), Stenodema virens
(Linnaeus), Teratocoris saundersi Douglas & Scott,
Teratocoris. viridis Douglas & Scott, Trigonotylus
doddi (Distant) and Trigonotylus ruficornis (Geot-
froy)) widespread in two or more zoogeographic
regions. The group is represented in Australia by
three genera and species, two of the species and
their genera are widespread. the third species is
endemic to Australia and New Zealand and belongs
to a genus (Chaetedus) known only from the
Australian, Papuan and New Zeuland regions, As
Eyles (1975) and Eyles and Carvalho (1975) have
recently reviewed these genera and species we give
here only a Summary account of the Australian
species. However, the distribution of the three
speci¢s which occur in Australia is much more
extensive than the above authors realised, so we
have mapped all locality records now available. bul
have cited in detail further records only of the two
less common species.
The three Australian species may be separated as
follows:—
76 REC. S, AUST. MUS_ 18(2); 75-82
Key to Australian Stenodemini
1. First antennal segment and base of second covered by long
erect pubescence, hairs as long as or longer than, width of
Segments, first antennal segment as long as {rom its
insertion to hase of pronotum
Dolichomiris linearis Reuter, 1882.
All antennal segments with only short pubescence, hairs
shorter than half width of segments; first antennal segment
much shorter than distance from its insertion to base of
in
ead; second
antennal segment with dark, bristlelike hairs near base;
ratio of length: width pronotum at base about 45:60; body
léngth in range 5-2-8-7 mm
Chaetedus longiceps Eyles, 1974
First antennal segment about as long as head; second
antennal segment without dark, bristle-like hairs: ratio
length: width pronotum about 20:33, body length in range
3-7-6-6mm) 0.55, Trigonotylus daddi (Distant, 1904)
ta
7
a
6
3
oO
a
5
B,
a
ic
ae
3
a
a
=}
a
a
>
oa
3
we
C
s
>
=
5
bt
Dolichomiris Reuter, 1882
Dolichomiris Reuter, 1882, p. 29. Additional
references and synonymy by Eyles & Carvalho,
1975, pp. 258, 267,
Type-species: Dolichomiris linearis Reuter, 1882.
For the type-species of synonymous genera see
Eyles & Carvalho opp.cit.
Body elongate and slender, smooth or very finely
punctured. Head horizontal, clypeus large and
visible from above, vertex sulcalte between eyes
which touch or nearly touch pronotum. Antennae
May, 1980
long, segments IT and II (at least basally) with long,
fine, erect, hairs which are at least as long as half
width of segment.
Pronotum with calli flat, smooth or very finely
punctured, collar depressed and weakly marked,
lateral margins carinate. Scutellum flat, smooth or
very finely punctate, Hemelytra smooth or very
finely rugose; cuneus distinctly longer than wide,
Legs long, hind tibiae covered with long, erect hairs.
Aedeagus with two spiculi,
Remarks: Only the type-species
Australia.
occurs in
Dolichomiris linearis Reuter, 1882
(Figs. 1-7, 16)
Dolichomiris linearis Reuter, 1882, p. 29. Additional
references and synonymy by Eyles and
Carvalho, 1975, pp. 258, 260-2 and by Carvalho
and Wallerstein, 1976, pp. 511-515.
Location of type: Lectotype ¢ in the Zoological
Museum of the University, Helsinki,
Colour: A faint, iridescent, pale brown with a
dark, reddish longitudinal stripe on head and a pale,
median longitudinal stripe on pronotum and
scutellum which is margined with light red, Eyes
grey, some red longitudinal marks laterally on head
and thorax, hind femora tending reddish brown,
Figs. 1-7—Dolichomiris linearis Reuter: Fig. 1—dorsal aspect:
Figs. 2-7—male genitalia; Fig, 2—vesica; Fig, 3—small
spiculum; Fig. 4-5—two aspects of left paramere; Figs, 6-
7—two aspects of right paramere,
GRASS BUGS OF THE TRIBE STESODEMINI V7
Structure: Very elongate, membrane considerably
surpassing apex of abdomen, hind femora not as
long as hemelytra. Long and erect hairs on antennae
restricted to first segment and base of second;
second and third antennal segments very long,
Male genitalia: Pygophore with a tooth on lett
hand side near upper corner, vesica (fig. 2) with two
spiculi, each with small sclerotized teeth (fig. 3).
Left paramere (figs. 4-5) falciform, tapering to apex.
Right paramere (figs. 6-7) smaller, constricted
medially, apex curved and pointed.
Length: 7:3-9-0 mm.
Distribution: Almost cosmopolitan, ranging from
southern Europe through east and west Africa, the
Canary Islands, Madeira, North, Central and South
America, the Galapagos Islands, India, Ceylon,
Burma, Java, Sumba, New Guinea, Queenstand, the
New Hebrides, New Caledonia (new record) and
Fiji.
Specimens examined: AUSTRALIA-Queensland
2¢¢ Redlynch, 31.viii. 1938, ex E,P. Van Duzee
collection May 1934, A, R, Brimblecombe; 2d,
Running Creek, 15.iv. 1941, A. W. Smith, all in
DPIO; Id. Rockhampton, 13.vii, L940, C. N.
Smithers, AM; 1¢, 14 km (9 mi.) n of Dayboro,
23.iv.1966, Z, Liepa, ANIC. These new localities
together with those of Eyles and Carvalho (1975)
have been platted on fig. 16.
tn addition we have examined material from the
following new localities outside of Australia. NEW
CALEDONIA—I1¢é 12, Mt, Quen Toro,
19.ix.1962, G. F, Gross; 19, by sweeping roadside
vegetation, 3 km. 5 of Touho, 10.x,1962, G. PF.
Gross, all in SAM. NEW HEBRIDES-BEfate, 124,
19, at light, Vila, 11 and 12.vii.1971, G. F. Gross on
Royal Society-Percy Sladen Expedition,
Erromanga, 1d 12 Ipotak, 5.viii.1971, G, F. Gross
on Royal Society-Percy Sladen Expedition, all in
SAM. FIJI Viti Levu, 12, sweeping and beating
herbs and shrubs, Nandarivatu, 800 m (2700 ft.),
10.xi.1964, N. McFarland; 19, Nagatosota Village,
1.1x.1976, J, A. Herridge SAM,
Remarks: According to Eyles and Carvalho
(1975) Dolichomiris linearis is more slender and
more delicate looking than other species of
Dolichomiris and has only a very finely punctate
pronofum,
Chaetedus Eyles, 1975
Chaeledus Eyles, 1975, p. 155-6; Eyles & Carvalho,
1975, p. 268.
Type-species:
1878. O.D.
Megalocervea reuteriana White,
Body elongate and slender, smooth with pro-
notuim dorsally finely punctured. Head horizontal,
clypeus large and visible from above; frons striate,
vertex sulcate between eyes which do not touch
anterior margin of pronotum. Antennae long,
segments I and IT (at least basally) with short,
bristle-like, dark hairs which are not as long as width
of segment,
Pronotum with calli flat, finely punctate except on
calli, collar depressed and weakly marked, lateral
margins thickly carinate except anteriorly. Scutellum
nearly flat. Hemelytra smooth or very finely rugase,
cuneus longer than wide. One of two spiculi of
aedeagus hooked, serrate or plumose.
Remarks: Chaetedus Eyles has four species,
reulerianus (White) is restricted to New Zealand,
longiceps Eyles occurs in beth Australia and New
Zealand, plumalis Eyles in Norfolk and the Raoul
Islands and rutilans Eyles in New Guinea,
Chactedus longiceps Eyles, 1975
(Figs, 8-16)
Chaetedus longiceps Eyles, 1975, pp, 156-7, 162,
Location of type: Holotype &
Entomology Division, DSIR,
Zealand
and allotype 2 in
Auckland. New
Colour: Fresh specimens green but later fading to
stramineous. Eyes grey, Antennal segments Il to 1V
red or suffused with reddish. pronotum with four
longitudinal dull stripes between inner stripes pale.
Scutellum with two longitudinal. dull stripes
between these paler. Apices of tibiae and tarsi red or
sulfused with reddish.
Structure; Second and third antennal segments
equal in length and each about three times as long as
first, fourth equal in length to first. Scutellum faintly
strigose on either side of midline. Hemlytra longer
than hind femora, membrane considerably surpas-
sing apex of abdomen.
Male genitalia: Pygophore (figs. LO-LL) with a
comical process on left side; vesica (fig. 12). both
spiculi sclerotized with the usual plumosity on one
reduced to minute teeth (fig. 13), Left paramere
(fig. 14) falciform and tapering to apex pointed and
curved apically. Right paramere (fig. 15) pointed
anically.
Length: 68-8 T mm.
Remarks: Species of this genus were formerly
thought to be all Megalocveroea reuteriana White
until Eyles (1975) showed that four species were
present in our general region and belonged to a new
genus which ditferes from Megaloceroea Fieber in,
inter alia. having the first antennal segment distinctly
78 REC. S$. AUST. MUS. 18(2): 75-82
2
May, 1980
Figs. 8-9—Chaetedus longiceps Eyles: Fig. 8—dorsal aspect; Fig.
9—lateral view of head and thorax.
shorter than the head and pronotum together and
one of the spiculi of the aedeagus, hooked, serrate
or feathery. Chaetedus reuterianus and C. longiceps
are green in life whereas the two species with a more
tropical distribution, plumalis and rutilans, are
reddish. C. reuterianus has a prominent, red, lateral
abdominal stripe which is absent in longiceps.
Distribution: New Zealand and Southern Aus-
tralia, including Tasmania.
Specimens examined: AUSTRALIA: New South
Wales, 1d, Oxford; 31.xii.1962, D. K. McAlpine;
Id,12, Mt. Gibraltar National Park, 24.17.1965, D.
K. McAlpine, all in AM; ¢ Rydalmere, at Mercury
vapour light, 15.x.1971; Broadwater NSWDA,
A.C.T. 19, Canberra, 27.iii.1959, G. E. Chadwick,
NSWDA. Victoria 12, Glen Waverley, sweeping
Gramineae and Campositae in garden,
19-31.xii.1976, J, J. H. Szent-Ivany. South Aus-
tralia, 32 2, Mylor, Nov. 1949, G. F. Gross, SAM.
Western Australia, 19, Walpole-Nornalup National
Park (35° 00'S, 116° 49’E) at The Knoll, 11.xi.1969,
E. B. Britton, ANIC. These localities and those of
Byles (1975) for Australia are plotted on fig. 16.
GRASS BUGS OF THE TRIBE STENODEMINI 79
|co-
Figs. 10-15—Chaetedus lonpiceps Eyles, male genitalia: Fig
[(}—ventral aspect of pygophore; Fig, | 1-—lateral aspect of
same; Fig, 12—vesica; Fig. 13—sclerotized spiculum, Fig.
14—left paramere; Fig, 15——-right paramere.
Trigonotylus Fieber, 1858
Trigonotylus Fieber, 1858, p.302. Other references
and synonymy in Eyles, 1975, pp. 153, 162.
Type-species: (of Trigonorylus) Miris ruficornis
Fallen, 1807 (=Cimex ruficarnis Geottroy in
Fourcroy, 1785) O.D,
Smallish and elongate, pronotum punctate. Head
horizontal, clyqeus large and visible from above,
frons usually prolonged over base of clypeus, vertex
suleate medially between eyes, eyes touching
pronotum, Antennae long, first segment not as long
as head and pronotum together, without black
bristle-like hairs.
Pronotum depressed laterally, collar depressed
and weakly marked, calli flat, lateral margins
carinate, Scutellum flat and smooth. Hemelytra
smooth and glabrous, cuneus distinctly longer than
wide. Legs relatively jong. Acdeagus with a single
spiculum, or spiculi lacking,
Remarks: Only the one cosmopolitan species is
represented in Australia. The genus was last revised
by Carvalho and Wagner 1957.
Trigonotylus doddi (Distant, 1904)
(Figs. 16-24)
Megaloceroea doddi Distant, 1904, p. 269; other
references and synonymy in Eyles 1975, pp.
162-4.
Location of type: Lectotype ¢ in British Muscum
(Natural History).
Colour: Fresh specimens green but later fading to
stramineous. Eyes grey. Antennae suffused with
pink, Pronotum and scutellum with a pale median
stripe bordered by a pale brown or red stripe on each
side, on pronotum on each side are additional fainter
brown or red stripes between the median stripes and
lateral margin. Apex of hind tibia, first two
tarsomeres and base of third of hind leg red, claw
and apex of last tarsomere of hind leg black, Corium
paler between veins R and M and costal margin,
Beneath lateral margins sometimes reddish.
Structiire: Second antennal segment a little longer
than third and both about three times as long as first.
fourth a little shorter than first. Hemelytra longer
than hind femora, membrane considerably surpas-
sing apex of abdomen,
Male genitalia: Pygophore (figs. 54-55) with a
conical spinous process on left side; aedeagus (fig.
56) with membranous lobes and one sclerotized
spiculum. Left paramere (figs. 57-58) falciform with
apex tapering and sinuate, right paramere (fig, 59)
small with a spinous apical process.
Length: 4-2-5-7 mm.
Remarks: This is much the most common and
widespread of the three Stenodemini species in
Australia and differs from Dolichomiris linearis and
Chaetedus longiceps in ats much smaller size and very
much shorter first antennal segment,
Distribution: Widely distributed mainly in tropical
and subtropical areas but in New Zealand and
Australia extending into the temperate zones and tn
the latter also into the arid regions, Trigonotylus
doddi has not been recorded from Tasmania, New
Caledonia, New Hebrides, Polynesia east of the
Gilbert and Kermadec Islands, Solomon Islands,
New Guinea or Indonesia. We have seen material
from the Cocos, Keeling and Fijian Islands from
which there were no previous records.
Specimens examined: 7 ex Department of Primary
Industries, Queensland; 9 ex QM) 10 ex ANIC; 4ex
AM: 15 ex New South Wales Department of
Agriculture; 2 ex NM; 69 ex SAM; 1 ex Western
Australian Department of Agriculture; 1 ex
Zoological Museum of the University, Helsinki.
As this species is now known to be widespread in
Australia we have not listed all the localities in detail
but have plotted the Australian records of Eyles
1975 and all the additional material we have
examined on the map on figure 16.
80 REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18(2): 75-82 May, 1980
DARWI
i
@+Hall’s Creek
\Q - iS ene
\ j e
|
val
PERTH
Albany
Dolichomirus linearis
4 records by Eyles & Carvalho
A new records
Chaetedus longiceps
0 records by Eyles
@ new records
Trigonotylus doddi
© records by Eyles
@ new records
Fig. 16—Distribution in Australia of Dolichomiris linearis Reuter,
Chaetedus longiceps Eyles and Trigonotylus doddi (Distant).
ane
oi ey
ADELAIDE op
‘ ’
Cairns
©Normanton
Mt. Morgan * 4
fe) Ao® "
j fo) , _7 BRISBANE A+O
@
—~, @ OR .
Cunnamulla _ 2S —4+0(Tambourine)
=a 5
[eR eo 5 yee ot us
*: e
? ss
SYDNEY gi @+ (Rydalmere)
~ a
A ak re
MELBOURNE: t
oO Q
0
9?
HOBART,
GRASS BUGS OF THE TRIBE STENODEMINI 81
Figs. 17-18—Trigonotylus doddi (Distant): Fig. 17—dorsal aspect;
Fig. 18—lateral view of head and thorax.
82 REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18(2): 75-82
Figs. 19-24—Trigonotylus doddi (Distant) male genitalia: Fig.
19—ventral aspect of pygophore; Fig. 20—lateral aspect of
pygophore; Fig. 21—aedeagus and vesica; Figs. 22-23—1wo
aspects of left paramere; Fig. 24—right paramere.
May, 1980
REFERENCES
CARVALHO, J. C. M. 1952. On the major classification of the
Miridae (Hemiptera), (With keys to subfamilies and tribes
and a catalogue of the world genera.) Ann. Acad. bras. Sci.
24 (1): 31-110.
CARVALHO, J. C, M. 1978. The tribe Hyalopeplini of the
world. The Australian fauna in collaboration with Gordon F,
Gross. Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 17 (30): 429-531.
CARVALHO, J. C. M. and WAGNER, E. 1957. A world
reyision of the genus Trigonotylus Fieber. (Hemiptera-
Heteroptera, Miridae.) Arg. Mus. nac. Rio de J, 43: 121-155.
CARVALHO, J. C. M. and WALLERSTEIN, P, 1976. Revision
of the genera Anthropophagiotes, Nesosylphas and Notostira
pacifica Kirkaldy, 1908 (Hemiptera, Miridae). Rev. brasil.
Biol. 36 (2): 511-515.
CHINA, W. E. 1943, The generic names of British Insects—Part
8, The generic names of the British Hemiptera-Heteroptera,
with a check list of the British species."’ (Royal Ent. Soc.;
London.)
DISTANT, W. L. 1904. Rhynchotal notes—XXIH. Heteroptera
from North Queensland. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., 13: (7): 263-
276.
EYLES, A. C. 1975, Further new genera and other new
combinations for species previously assigned to Megaloceroea
(Heteroptera: Miridae: Stenodemini), J, nat. Hist., 9 (2):
153-167.
EYLES, A. C. and CARVALHO, J.C. M. 1975. Revision of the
genus Dolichomiris, with a revised key to the genera of
Stenodemini (Heteroptera: Miridae). J. nat. Hist., 9 (3): 257-
269.
FIEBER, F. X. 1858. Criterien zur generischen Theilung der
Phytocoriden (Capsini auct). Wiener Ent. Monatsch. 2: 289-
327.
REUTER, O. M. 1882. Ad cognitionem Heteropterorum Africae
Occidentalis, Ofv. F. Ver. Soc. Férh. 25: 1-43.
SCHUH, R. T. 1976. Pretarsal structure in the Miridae
(Hemiptera) with a cladistic analysis of relationships within
the family. Amer. Mus. Novit, 2601; 1-39.
TWO NEW GENERA OF THE SUBFAMILY PENTATOMINAE
(HETEROPTERA: PENTATOMIDAE) FROM THE AUSTRALIAN REGION
BY IMTIAZ AHMAD AND NASEER AHMAD KHAN
Summary
Two new genera, Grossiana and Knightiella, are described to accommodate Strachia persignata
Walker and Stenozygum flavifrons Distant known from Queensland and New Caledonia
respectively. The above species are redescribed, the characters of their metathoracic scent gland
ostioles and male and female genitalia are described for the first time and their position in the
subfamily Pentatominae is briefly discussed.
TWO NEW GENERA OF THE SUBFAMILY PENTATOMINAE (HETEROPTERA: PENTATOMIDAE)
FROM THE AUSTRALIAN REGION!
IMTIAZ AHMAD and NASEER AHMAD KHAN
Department of Zoology, University of Karachn, Karachi, Pakistan
ABSTRACT
AHMAD, L., & KHAN, N. A. 1979. Two new genera of the
subfamily Pentatominae (Heteroptera!Pentatomidae) trom the
Australian region. Rec, S, Austr, Mus. 18(3); 83-90,
Two new genera, Grossiana and Knightiella, are
described to accommodate Strachia persignata
Walker and Stenozyguin flavifrons Distant known
from Queensland and New Caledonia respectively,
The above species are redescribed, the characters of
their metathoracie scent gland ostioles and male and
female genitalia are described for the first time and
their position in the subfamily Pentatominae is
briefly discussed.
INTRODUCTION
Strachia persignata Walker, 1867 and Stenozyguin
flavifrons Distant, 1914 were described trom
Queensland and New Caledonia respectively in the
Australian region, During a revision of Srenozygum
Fieber, 186) from the Oriental and Australian
regions by the present authors the above species
were compared with the type-species of the genus
and with all the Oriental and Australian species
described under the genera Strachia Hahn, 1833 and
Stenozygum and were found to be very different,
especially in the characters of metathoracic scent
gland ostioles and male and female genitalia, These
two species are redescribed here with special
reference to the above-mentioned characters and
placed each in a new genus, Grossiana and
Knightiella respectively. Their position in the family
is briefly discussed. For the dissection of male and
female genitalia, for measurements and diagrams
the conventional procedures, especially those of the
present authors (in press) have generally been
followed.
Genus GROSSIANA New Genus
Body brilliantly patterned.
Head: Eyes stalked; basal antennal segments
uniformly thick and slightly inwardly curved,
distinctly passing beyond apex of head, labium
reaching posterior coxae,
Thorax; Metathoracic scent gland ostioles without
peritreme and with ill-defined evaporatoria,
' Financially supported by an ARC-USDA Research Project
A17-ENT-37, (FG-Pa-181),
Male genitalia; Pygophore with latero-posterior
lobes distinct but not detached or marked from the
rest of the pygophore;, parameres simple, sickle-
shaped; inflated aedeagus with vesica distinctly
shorter than penial lobes and apically semi-
sclerotized, dorsal membranous conjunctival appen-
dage, and ventral conjunctival appendage fully
membranous.
Female genitalia: Female terminalia with triangu-
lin visible in between Ist gonocoxae, with ends
pointed and reaching to inner anterior margin of Ist
gonocoxae, spermatheca without processes on
spermathecal bulb.
Comparative note: Grossiana is somewhat closely
related to Strachia in having the basal antennal
segment long and surpassing apex of head and
second antennal segment subequal to third, but it
can easily be separated from all the species of that
genus in having a simple unilobed pronotum as
opposed to distinctly laterally bilobed in the specics
of Strachia and in other characters noted under
“Systematic positions”.
The genus is named in honour of Dr, G. F, Gross.
of South Australian Museum, Adelaide, Australia to
acknowledge his work on Heteroptera.
Type-species: Strachia persignata Walker, 1867.
Grossiana persignata (Walk.)
(Figs. 1-10)
Strachia persignata Walker, 1867, p, 347.
Stenozygum persignatum Distant. 1881, p. 213.
Coloration; Body shining black with prominent
yellow markings (fig. 1), uniformly punctured except
head and anterior portion of pronotum, ventrally
yellow with a small black patch in the middle on
either side along the margins of bucculae, a small
black spot at the base of antenniferous tubercles on
either inner side, broad black longitudinal lines on
outer portion of pro-, meso-, and metapleuron, on
either side, black punctures on the rest of pro-.
meso-, and metapleuron, dark brown 2nd, 3rd and
4th segments of labium, 4 black transverse patch
posterior to spiracles on 2nd-7th abdominal
segments and a black transverse patch on outer
portion along the lines between 2nd-7th abdominal
segments on either side,
Rd REC. S. AUST, MUS, 183): 83-90 May, 1980
Fig. 1—Grossiana persignata (Walker) female, dorsal view.
TWO NEW GENERA OF THE SUBFAMILY PENTATOMINAE 84
Head: Anteocular portion equal to the posterior
portion of head including eyes, length of anteocular
portion 0:75 mm, length of posterior portion of head
including eyes 0-75 mm (0:65-0-80 mm); width
including eyes 2:30 mm (2-20-2:30 mm); interocular
distance 1-1] mm; interocellar distance 0:80 mm
(0-80-0:90 mm); paraclypei with tips slightly
separated from each other. terminating above and
subequal to clypeus, basal antennal segments. well
passing the apex of head, 3rd segments slightly
longer than the 2nd antennal segments; length ot
segments 1, 0:50 mm (0-50-0-55 mm), H, 1-10 mm
(0:-00-L-1 mm), Hf, 1:20 mm (1-L0-1-20 mm), IV,
140 mm, V, mutilated, antennal formula
1<2<3<4; Labium reaching posterior coxae, Ist
segment slightly extending beyond bucculac, latter
nal reaching to the base of head; length of segments
1, 0-80 mm (0°70-0-80 mm), IT, 0-95 am ((°835-0-95
mm), UI, 0-60 mm (0-55-0-66 frm), IV, 0-70 mm
(0-65-0:70 mm), labial formula 3<4<1<2,
Tharax: Pronotim 25x wider than long, length
1-70 mm (1:60-1:80 mm), width 4:30 mm (3-70-4-30
mm); scutellar length about 1 x the length of
pronotum, scutellar length 3-10 mm, width 2:70 mm
(2:65-2:70 mr); metathoracic scent gland ostioles
small elliptical, without pentreme and with ill-
defined evaporatoria; distance from base of
scutellum to apex of clayus 2-15 mm, apex of
scutellum to apex of clavus 0-985 mm: apex of
scutellum to apex of abdomen (including mem-
brane) 3-10 mm (2:6-3-10 mm),
Abdomen: Anterior margin of 7th abdominal
sternum acute in male and medially convex in
female, posterior margin medially broadly concave
in male and medially bilobed in female, connexiva
slightly exposed at repose. Total length ¢ 7-60 mm,
2 9-40 mm (9:05-9:40 mm).
Male genitalia: Pygophore (figs. 2-4) nearly 2x
wider than long, ventro-posterior margin medially
concave with a pair of quadrate proecsses consisting
of a group of hairs al their apices on either inner side
adjacent to median concavity, procter sclerotized;
parameres (figs. 5 and 6) with comparatively short
straight stem and elongated tapering curved blade
and spine-like inner process at junction of stem and
balde; inflated aedeagus (figs. 7 and 8) with a more
or Jess cuboidal theca. broader posteriorly than
anteriorly and with minute lateral thecal appen-
dages, conjunctiva along with vesica enclosed in a
cup-shaped structure with a hexagonal ventral
surface and more or less trapezoidal dorsal surface,
dorsal membranous conjunctival appendage taper-
ingly bilobed and semisclerotized apically, ventral
membranous conjunctival appendage bilobed and
shorter than dorsal membranous conjunctival
appendage, penial lobes fused, enclosing a slightly
longer vesica.
Female genilalia: (figs, 9 and 10) Posterior margin
of triangulin slightly convex; exposed part of Ist
gonocoxae 3x broader than long; 9th paratergites
with apices truncate with apical angles distinctly
touching the posterior margin af 6th paratergites:
spermatheca (fig. 10) with spermathecal median
dilation divided into a posterior large and anterior
small pouch by a constriction, spertnatheca with
distal duct slightly dilated, bulb without processes,
Material exantined: Wolotype, Austraha,
"'Strachia persignata (Walker) “57-130 “96" in
British Museum (Natural History) Lovdon, | ¢.2 2
Australia: Queensland, Rockhampton; [ ¢d Aus-
tralia: Brisbane, Queensland Mus, R. Hamlin Harris
1914-202; “647; 1 @ Australia: Goodna, 10-11-24,
R. Backer 163" ‘Australia, British Museum, 1926-
241° - Australia: Peak Downs”, Distant Coll. 1911-
“3R3°-9 2,2 2 Australia, in B.M.(N,H.);bd,2 4%,
Australia, Queensland: Bundaberg, Gayndah,
Rockhampton, A.M. Lea det.A.Musgrave in South
Australian Museum, Adelaide: Australia.
Genus KNIGHTIELLA New Genus
Body predominantly green and less brilliantly
patterned than other genera of Strachiini,
Head: Eyes sessile; basal antennal segments
uniformly slender, straight, distinctly surpassing
apex of head; lahium reaching to 4th abdominal
sepment
Thorax: Metathoracic scent gland ostioles with
elongated well developed peritreme and well
defined evaporatorja-
Abdomen: Strigose vittae present on 2nd, 3rd and
4th abdominal segments,
Male genitalia’ Pygophore without distinct latero-
posterior lobes; parameres F-shaped, inflated
aedeagus with vesica distinctly longer than penial
lobes and dorsal membranous conjunctival appen-
dage.
Female genitalia: Female terminalia with triangu-
lin visible in between Ist gonocoxac, large,
rectangular-shaped and reaching to middle of inner
margins of Ist gonocaxae; spermatheea with bulb
having one lang and one short processes.
Comparative note: Knightiella is isolated in the
entire tribe Strachiini in the characters of predomin-
antly green and less patterned body, uniformly
slender basal antennal segments passing distinctly
beyond apex of head, and in the characters o!
metathoracie scent gland osticles and male and
female genitalia noted under systematic positions
& REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18(3): 83-90
Mey, Take)
EN Nic Snneay met
eon
0.60mm
Figs, 2-10—Grossiana persignata (Walker),
vy"
ee
©
(
'
i
‘i
\
t
0.60mm
Pygophore; Fip
2—Dorsil view: Fig 3—Ventral view: Fig, 4—Horizantal
view, paramere: Fig. 5—Dersyl view: hig. h—Vontral view,
aedeagus; Fig. 7-Dorsal view: Pig. 8—Ventral view. Fig.
Y—Femule terminulia, ventral yiew: Fig. \0—Spermatheva,
ventral view,
The genus Knightiella is named in the honour of
Dr. W. J, Knight who is in charge of the Hemiptera
section, Britsh Museum (Natural History) London
to recognise his work on Hemiptera.
Type-species: Stenozyguin flavifrans Distant, 1914.
Knightiella flayvifrons (Dist, )
(Figs. 11-21)
Stenozygum flavifrons Distant, 1914, p. 375.
Coloration; Body green with prominent yellow
and light green markings, uniformly punctured
except head (fig. 11); ventrally green with head,
thoracic sternum, posterior coxae, lateral margins of
propleuron, small outer portion of mesopleuron,
postenior margin of metapleuron yellow, 4th and
basal portion of Sth labial segments brown, and apex
of labium black, portion around ostioles and
peritreme white, lateral und a little outer posterior
margin of each abdominal segment and broad
median protion of 2nd-6th abdominal segments
yellow,
Head: Anteacular portion equal to the posterior
portion of head including eyes, length of anteecular
portion 0-65 mm (0:65-0-70 mm), length of posterior
TWO NEW GENERA OF THE SUBFAMILY PENTATOMINAE 87
portion of head including eves 0-65 mm (0-65-0:70
mim); width including eyes 1.75 mm (1-75-1-85 mm);
interovwlar distance (9S mm (0-95-L-05 mr),
interocellar distan¢e 0-40 mm (0-60-0-65 mm);
paraclypei With tips separated and subequal to the
clypeus; basal antennal segments. uniformly slender,
straight, distinetly passing the apex of head, 3rd
segments slightly longer than ['/2 x the length of 2nd
antennal segments; length of segments T. 0-45 mm
(0:45-0:50 mm), 11, 0:60 mm, 11, 1-00mm, 1V, & V.
mutilited, labium teaching to 4th abdominal
segment, Ist sogment distinctly extending beyond
bucculae, latter not reaching to the base of head,
length of segments 1, 0-95 mm, 11, 1-10 mm, HT, 0-60
mm, LV, 0-65 mm, labial formula 3<4<1<2
Thorax: Pronotum slightly more than 2-5 x wider
than long, length 1-30 mm (1-30-1-40 mm), width
3-40 mm (3-40-3-80 mm); scutellar length about L's x
the Jength of pronotum, scutellar length 2-35 mm
(2:35-2-55 mm), width 2-20 mm (2-20-2-40 mm);
metathoracie scent yland ostioles (fig, 12) with
075mm
Fig. Ll—Knightiella flavifrony (Dyst ) male dorsal viene
88 REC. 8. AUST
elongated crescent-shaped peritreme and well
defined evaporatoria; distance base of scutellum to
apex of clayus 1:60 mm (1:60-1:80 mm); apex of
scutellum to apex of clavus 0-75 mm; apex of
scutellum fo apex of abdomen (including mem-
brane) 2-05 mm (2-05-2-20 mm).
Abdomen: Anterior margin of 7th abdominal
sternum medially broadly and smoothly convex and
posterior margin medially broadly and smoothly
concave in male and female; connexiva nat exposed.
Total length ¢ 7-0 mm, 2 7-55 mm,
Male genitalia: Pygophore (figs. 13-15) nearly 3x
broader than long in middle, ventroposterior margin
medially broadly concave with a pair of elongated
lobe-like appendages on either side of median
concavity (visible in posterior view only); proctiger
sclerotized posteriorly and laterally while remaining
portion thin and membranous; parameres (figs. 16
and 17) with a short foot-like stem and a long
itregularly-shaped blade with outer three bulges,
large inner tooth and distal curved part rounded
apically, inner tooth and distal part of parameres
MUS. 18(3); 83-90 May, 1980
imparting a more or less F-shaped appearance ta this
structure; inflated aedeagus (figs. 18 and 19) with
elongated theca tapering posteriorly without distinct
lateral thecal appendages, dorsal membranous,
conjunctival appendage bilobed, equal to penial
lobes, latter fused anteriorly and terminating into
truncate apices,
Female genitalia: (figs. 20-21) Posterior margin of
triangulin with an obtuse angle in middle; exposed
part of Ist gonocoxae slightly broader than long; 9th
paratergites with apices rounded, with apical angles
not touching the posterior margin of 8th parater-
gites; spermatheca (fig. 21) with elongated median
dilaton, without any constriction and with uniform
distal duct and two processes on the bulb, one
thicker and larger as compared to other.
Material examined: 2 3, 1° New Caledonia: Ba
Bay. 5-VI[-19174, P. D. Montague 1918-87 "New
Caledonia Exped", Stenozygum flavifrons Dist. "C,
H, Lyal det. 1977 British Museum (Natural History)
London,
Figs, 12-21—Knightiella flavifrons (Dist.); Fig. 12—Metathoracic
scent gland ostioles, pygophore; Fig, 13—Dorsal view; Fig.
I4—Ventral view; Fig. 15—Horizontal view, paramere; Fig.
16—Dorsal view: Fig. 17—Ventral view; uedeagus; Fig.
18—Dorsal view; Fig, 19—Ventral view: Fig. 20—Female
terminalia, ventral view; Fig, 2)—Spermatheca, ventral
view.
TWO NEW GENERA OF THE SUBFAMILY PENTATOMINAP 89
SYSTEMATIC POSITIONS
The Genus Knightiella is not only very different
fram all the species of the genus Stenozygum but is
completely isolated in the entire tribe Strachiini Stal,
1876 (Strachia group Gross, 1976) on the basis of
metathoracic scent gland ostioles with well
developed peritreme and completely defined
evaporatoria, 4edeagus with vesica distinetly longer
than penial lobes, parameres F-shaped and sper-
mathecal bulb with processes, It has stvigose vittae
on UI, Il and JV abdominal segments laterally
similar to those in the members of Mecideini
Distant, 1902 and of Diemenia group Gross, 1976.
The members of the former group are gencrally
elangated and slender having shorter peritreme in
the metathoriacic scent gland ostioles and have lobe-
like short and rounder blade without inner lobe in
parameres, acdeagus with elongated and conical
lateral conjunctival lobes and the spermatheca is
without pracesses on the bulb, In the latter group
the paraclypei generally surpass the clypeus and may
be reflexed laterally and often produced into small
lobes or processes in front of the eyes, the aedeagus
has prominent bilobed conjunctiva with or without
addijional median and ventral lobes aod the vesiva Is
short and robust (Sailer 1952, Abbasi 1978, Gross
1976).
On the other hand F-shaped parameres ure found
in the species of Carpovorin Stal, 1876 (Curpaceris
group Gross, 1976) including the speeics of
Avonoscelis Spinglu, 1837 for whieh Sal (1876)
formed his division Agenoseelaria and this was also
follawed by Atkinson (1888). Similarly V-shaped
parameres are found in many species of Halyi Stal,
i872 (Halys group Gross. 1976) as reported by
Ahmad and Abbasi (1974), Abbasi and Alimad
(1975), Gross (1976) and Ahmad and Afzal (in
manuscript). Some of the species af Diemenia wroup
also have rather blade-shaped parameres which
could look vaguely P-shaped (Gross. personal
communication), But in none of these groups a
combination of charaeters as listed in the generic
description are found. Either it should have its own
group within the subtamily Pentatominae or its
position remain unascertained until # world wide
revision of the subfamily is completed.
On the contrary the genus Grossiana certainly
belongs to the tribe Strachiini in the characters of
metathoracic scent gland ostioles without peritreme
and with ill-defined evaporatoria, brilliantly col-
oured body, somewhat stylate eyes, simple sickle-
shaped parameres. in the male and_ bilobed
spermathecal median dilation without processes on
the bulk of the females. However Grossiana differs
remarkably from all the species of the genus
Stenozygum in the characters of the long, uniformly
swollen and slightly inwardly curved basal antennal
segment surpassing apex of head (in S. laelibile
(Walker) the basal antennal segment distinctly
surpasses the apex of head but the second is
distinctly shorter than the third) and the second
antennal segment subequal to third, The latter is
also found in the species of Sirachia bul the
prominent laterally bilobed pronotum, the simple
hook-like parameres, and the medially deeply
concave posterior margin af the seventh female
abdominal sternum in all the species of Strachia
(Ahmad & Kamuluddin 1978) clearly separate the
two gentra,
ACKNOWLENGEMENTS
The present wuthors are deeply indebted to Dr,
W. J. Knight. in-charge of Hemiptera Seetion, to
Dr P. Freeman Keeper. Department of Ento-
mology aud the trustees of the British) Museum
(Natural History) Londen for their kind permission
for the first author fo examine the genitaha of the
holotype of Srruchia persignata and other identified
specimens of the above species and Stenozyguin
flavifrons Distant laged at their Museum during his
receur visit (1977-78) to their Museum, Dr. G F,
Gress of South Australian Museum, Adelaide,
Australia is sincerely acknowledged for lnaning
three identified Specimens of persignaium (Lo .2 2)
and for critically reading the manuscript
REFERENCES
ABBAS. G. A. 1974 A new speaes of a palacarctic penus
Holeosiethus Weber (Pentatominae; Carpocorni) fron
Pakistan Karn Univ f Se, § (1 & 2), 81-84,
ABBASL, O.A. and AHMAD, |. 1975. A new species of the
genus Hayly Faber (Pentatomidae! Halyini) from East Bengal
With notes on jls genitalia dnd there bearing on classification,
Kar, Univ. Se. 4 (1-2); 35-41
AHMAD. Ll. and ABBASI. Q. A. 1974, a new genus and species
of Halyini Stal with phylagenetic considerations. Kar. Liniv,
J. Se. 3 (1-2): 61-65.
AHMAD, land KAMALUDDIN. S, 1978. Two new species of
the genus Sirachia Hahn (Pentatominae; Strachiini) trom
Bangladesh with a taxonamic note on the Tribal name. Kar,
Uni. J. Se. 6 (i): 35-41.
ATKINSON, FE. T. i888, Notes on Indian Rhynchota;
Heteroptera. /. Asiat. Soc, Beng, 23 66-69,
DISTANT, W. L. L881. Rhynchota from the Australian and
Pacific regions. Trans. ent. Soe Lond. 188: 211-218.
DISTANT, W. L. 1902, The fauna of British India, including
Ceylon and Burma, Rhynchota. 1. Taylor and Francis,
London,
DISTANT, W. L. 1914. Rhynchota from New Caledonia and the
surrounding islands, In Sarasin. F, and Roux, J. Nowa
Caledonia, Zaologie 1: 369-390,
FIEBER. F. X, 1861, Die Europaischen Hemiptera Halbfliigler
(Rhynchota: Heteroptera): 113-444, Carl Gerold’s Sohn,
Wien.
90 REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18(3): 83-90
GROSS, G. F. 1976. Plant feeding and other bugs (Hemiptera) of
South Australia. Heteroptera. Part II. Government Printer,
South Australia.
HARN, C. W. 1833. Die Wanzenartigen Insecten (I-III). C. H.
Zeh’schen, Niirnberg.
SAILER, R. I. 1952. A review of the stink bugs of the genus
Mecidea. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 102: 47-505.
May, 1980
STAL, C. 1872. Enumeratio Hemipterorum. K. svensk. Vetensk.
Akad. Handl. 3: 31-40.
STAL, C. 1876. Enumeratio Hemipterorum (1). Bidrag till on
fortechning of ver alla hittills Kanda Hemiptera Janta
Systentiska Meddentandon and Stockholm. K. svenska
Vetensk. Akad. Férh. 1: 1-232.
WALKER, F. 1867. Catalogue of the specimens of Heterop-
terous—Hemiptera in the Collection of the British Museum,
Pt. 2. British Museum, London.
SOME REMARKS ON THE BREEDING DISTRIBUTION AND TAXONOMY
OF THE PRIONS (PROCELLARITIDAE: PACHYPTILA)
BY J. B. COX
Summary
The breeding distributions of prions are reviewed and the characters used to differentiate Pachyptila
vittata, P. salvini, P. desolata, P. belcheri, P. turtur and P. crassirostris are critically assessed.
Feeding habits and the concept that differing breeding times isolate these prions genetically are also
discussed. Evaluation of the evidence indicates that their previous classification into three genera or
sub-genera is invalid because only two groups are clearly separable by morphological
characteristics: the Fairy Prions (turtur and crassirostris) and the Whale-Birds (belcheri, desolata,
salvini and vittata). The former are considered to be one polytypic species and the whale-birds to be
one monotypic and one polytypic species.
SOME REMARKS ON THE BREEDING DISTRIBUTION AND TAXONOMY OF THE
PRIONS
(PROCELLARIIDAE; PACH YPTILA)
By
J. B. COX
2 Rockbourne Street, Elizabeth North, South Australia 5113
ABSTRACT IV. Discussion .,,...., ceTeesaDEereerttertve. 2
COX, J. B, 1979. Some remarks on the breeding distribution and V. Acknowledgements ....)......-5. sense = BO
taxonomy of the Prions (Procellariidae: Pachyptila). Rec,S.Aus!. WY]. References............0....2.22-2 2221 30
Mus. 18(4); 91-121,
The breeding distributions of prions are reviewed
and the characters used to differentiate Pachyptila
vittata, P, salvini, P, desolata, P. beleheri, P. turtur
and P. crassirostris are critically assessed. Feeding
habits and the concept that differing breeding times
isolate these prions genetically are also discussed,
Evaluation of the evidence Indicates that their
previous classification into three genera or sub-
genera is invalid because only two groups are clearly
separable by morphological characteristics; the Fairy
Prions (turtur and crassirostris) and the Whale-Birds
(belcheri, desolata, salvini and vittata), The former
are considered to be one polytypic species and the
whale-hirds to be one monotypic and one polytypic
species.
Characters described as differentiating turtur and
crasstrostris jatergrade through many island popu-
lations north-south and west-east.. However, the
sharp boundary between each form in the Chatham
[s, allows their recognition as subspecies, although
elsewhere delimitations are arbitrary. The character-
istics of Whale-hirds also intergrade, but in their case
two species can be recognised, P, belchert 1s here
treated as specifically distinet from the desolata-
salvini-viltala complex, ullhough they have a zune of
overlap and hybridization in the subantaretie Indian
Ocean, Southern desolata and northern viltata are in
all probability conspecific and evidently salvinris an
imermediate form of hybrid origin, [In two southern
oceanic regions (South Atlantic and New Zealand)
there are no intermediates between desolata and
viltata and both are clearly distinguishable; but in
the southern Indian Ocean region their differences
are less pronounced nd intergrade through salvini
populations.
CONTENTS
‘U
o
og
a
ADSIHTACE occ ere eee stele ewelacetnee!s
1, Introduction . 2.0.00... ee te “
LL, Methods. 20. 0 cc cee cee ee ee
Ill. Observations ..-, 02.20 62.4 eee eee
(a) Breeding Distribution... , r
(b) Comparative Morphology .......,
(c) Zones of Intergradation .,..,.0).,
(d) Differences in Breeding Times ...,
(e) Feeding Habits .... ATT Yeere et
Sow NM ee
MW MM
1. INTRODUCTION
The small southern oceanic petrels known as
prions or whale-birds were al different times
classified in several genera, a varying number of
species and many subspecies by Mathews (1912,
1932, 1937, 1938), Murphy (1936) disagreed wath
Mathews’ changeable concepts and believed there
were only four species in the single genus Pachyptla.
His elucidation of the group was welcomed by
Fleming (1939) who defined a fifth species. Ina later
systematic review Falla (1940) recognised five
polytypic and one monotypic species of three sub
genera, and Fleming (1941) hypothesized their
phylogeny, Some of these species had minor
differences in plumage coloration, but all six were
distinguishable only by the size, shape and structure
of their bills, occasionally in conjunction with
relative wing dimensions, [n this respect systematists
have emphasised the distinctiveness of prion bills.
Murphy (1936) wrote that the bill of each species
“stands out clearly as a distinct entity, withoul
exhibiting a degree of variation which might be
interpreted as interpradation,’’ Fleming (1941)
considered that "the bill characters by themselves
are diagnostic,”
Contrary to these views there is increasing
awareness that the bill characters of each species
vary greatly. Clancy (1965) and Watson (1975) listed
salvini afd vittata as conspecific. Furthermore,
beach-washed specimens of unknown origin are
frequently not identifiable (Cox 1976). Neverthe-
less, most authors still follow Falla's (1940)
classification and difficulties in identification have
been explained in various ways. Fullagar (1972)
wrote: ‘Since identification depends so much on the
form of the bill, not only its size, but also an
appreciation of its shape, many of the subtle
characteristics of each species can be recognised only
with experience.’ Serventy et al. (1971) noted that
some immatures have smaller bills and may not be
recognisable, and Kinsky and Harper (1968) showed
that through shrinkage the bill-width of dried
specimens may be less than in fresh or live
specimens. However, under the current classitica-
tion of Species these points do not appear realistic
92 REC. S$. AUST, MUS, 18(4); 91-121
when, as is often the case, two otherwise
indistinguishable specimens are allocated to diffe-
rent species simply because their bill-widths differ by
one or two millimetres,
Il. METHODS
In an attempt to resolve the problems of
identification, specimens of adults from most known
breeding places were obtained on loan to the South
Australian Museum from eight other museum
collections. Specimens collected at sea were alsa
borrowed, and use was made of numerous beach-
washed birds collected by myself, and fram
Australian museum collections.
Falla (1940) wrote "the older preoccupation with
bill measurements for specific diagnosis is mislead-
ing” and the “importance of emphasis on certain bill
characters was first clearly stressed by Mathews".
However, bill characters can be adequately specified
only by illustration and most authors have shawn
only one supposedly typical bill of cach species
(Murphy 1936; Fleming 1941; Slater 1970; Serventy
eral. 1971; Fallagar 1972; Macdonald 1973, Watson
1975). This aspect has obscured the existence of
great vanation in the bills of the species recognised.
Por these reasons, 4 range of prion bills are here
illisteated. The drawings were all made al twice
actual size on graph paper of lwo-millimetre squares
Uirect from specimens, traced onto cartridge paper
and reduced to getual size for publication, The
museum registration numbers of each specimen are
piven, and each drawing is also consecutively
numbered and prefixed A (Fairy Prions) or
(Whale-Birds) for cross references.
Measuremenis were all caken from dry skins m
accordance with merhous deseribed by Disney e/ al
(1974) bul, because many authors have emphasised
that the bill is the ovajor identification feature of
pnians. fhe methods of measuring bills are detailed:
culmen—tltom the juncture of the forehead feathers
and nasal tubes taken as a chord to the bill tip; bill
width—taken at the widest point of the bill, usually
but not always at the base; bill depth—a vertical line
from the point immedistely in front of the nostrils ta
the underside of the lower mandible on a properly
closed bill. MeEvey (1957) showed that measure-
ments taken from the same specimens by different
persons sometimes vary; (herefore, there may be
small differences between the dimensions | give and
those given by other wrirers, Ail dimensions cited
are tn millimetres.
Registration mumbers of specimens are abbrevi-
uted; AMNIT—Americsn Museum of Natural
History. New York; AMS—Australian Muscum,
Sydney, BMNH—British Museum (Natural His-
tory), Pring; CMC—Canterbury Museum, Christ-
church; CSTRO—C.S.1.R.O. Division of Wildlife
May. 1980
Research, Canberra; DMW—Dominion (now
National) Museum, Wellington; MNHN—Muséum
National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris; NMV—
National Museum of Victoria, Melbourne; SAFM—
South Africa Museum, Capetown; SAM—South
Australian Museum, Adelaide,
Various Geographical regions and zones are
considered. Murphy (1936) and Servyenty et al,
(1971) have described the surface water zones of the
Southern Ocean, the Antarctic and Subtropical
Convergences are shown in Figure 1, Definitions of
the Antarctic and Subantarctic Zones follow
Roberts (1964), and the Subtropical Zone js
considered here to be the seas north of the
Subtropical Convergence. Different sectors of the
Southern Ocean are also discussed: the southeru
Atlantic region (from southern South American and
Antarctic Peninsulas and outlying islands, east to
South Africa, approximately 18°E); the southern
Indian Ocean region (from 18"E to the Western
Australian coastline, approximately 115°E): and the
Australian-New Zealand region (from 11S°E to
165°W), Prions breed at many localities in each of
these sectors, but are not known to breed in the
southern Pacific Ocean sector between 165°W and
75" W
lil, OBSERVATIONS
(a) RREEDING DISTRIBUTION
Prions occur over the uintaretic, subantaretic and
neighbouring subtropical seas, and breed on oceanic
and offshore islands and the mainlands of Antaretica
and Souch [,, N.Z,, The breeding grounds of ¢ach
recognised species have been frequently listed
inemrectly and require clarification. They are shown
In Figure | und listed below, but some remin
indefinite.
Falla (1940) did mot clearly define the breeding
distribution of PF. tarrur fallai Oliver, 1930, With the
exception of this subspecies, all subspecies he
recognised are listed, but with later evidence und
amendments included.
P, turtur (Kuhl, 1820): Islands of Bass Strait. off
Tasmania (Wood Jones 1937; Condon 1975). and off
New Zealand fram the Poor Knights Is, squth to
Cook and Foveaux Straits (Falla et al. 1966, Condon
1975); Snares Is. (sec below); Big and Little
Mangere Js of the Chatham Croup (Fleming 1939,
Falla 1940); Marion 1. (van Zinderen Bakker 1971)
and Beauchene I., Falkland Group (Strange 1968),
Also, probably on fle de VEst of Archipel Crozet
(Despin et al, 1972), possibly Antipades Is. (see
below), and two specimens were collected on
Macquarie I. (Keith and Hines 1958).
I agree with Condon (1975) who wrote that no
subspecies ‘can be recognised at this time.” Falla
BREEDING DISTRIBUTION AND TAXONOMY OF THE PRIONS 93
KNTIC
xl
5S. GEORGIA
geht
Van
S
SS =@ S oFKneY Is,
S. SHETLAND IS.
SCOTT |.
BOUNTY
i.
CHATHAM IS.
x D,
POOR KNIGHTS
@ turtur i belcheri
O POSSIBLE
g Crassirostris
O POSSIBLE
Fig 1.—Breeding distribution of prions.
(1940) listed the breeding distribution of fallai as:
‘Breeding: Stewart Island, Akaroa, Chatham
Islands, ? Bass Straits, ? South Indian Ocean or
West Australia.’ He also listed Bass Strait,
Chatham Is. and ? Stewart I. in the breeding
distribution of nominate turtur. Falla et al. (1966)
said Antipodes Is. turtur are a small subantarctic race
(P. turtur subantarctica Oliver, 1955), although,
when naming the subspecies, Oliver (1955) sug-
gested they are a larger form because he wrote that a
specimen “‘thus resembles P. crassirostris more than
P.t.turtur.”’.
PR @ stan DA CUNHA
(@) Goucn |
S$, SANDWICH IS.
®
ANTIPODES |S.
‘ pM rucxvano Is.
Moy,
“Nay
?
© BOUVETSYA
ik ARCHIPEL
CROZET
CAPE DENISON
MACQUARIE I.
NARES IS
STEWART 47
TASMANIA
7
@ desolata
I salvini
@ vittata
Snares Is.: Falla (1940) said ‘Oliver’s suggestion
(1930: 115) that the stout-billed form occurs at the
Snares is not supported by a specimen, in the Otago
Museum, which has the bill form of typical
P.t.turtur.’ Oliver later (1955) listed this specimen as
P.t.turtur. Fleming (1948) wrote that on the main
Snares Island ‘‘Fairy Prions (Pachytila turtur) nested
deep in rock crevices among boulders piled along the
shores,”” Warham (1967) also reported turtur
‘nesting solely in rock crevices and talus debris” on
the main island, but after a fourteen-month stay on
this island Horning Jr. and Horning (1974) only
94 REC. §, AUST, MUS. 18(4): 91-121
reported ““Prions, probably both Fairy (Pachyptila
turtur) and Broad-billed, were seen flying near and
vver the main island during mast months,” without
mention of breeding. Fleming and Baker (1973),
reporting on birds of the Western Chain of islands in
the Snares Group, wrote ‘A new record from the
Snares is the Fulmar Prion (Pachyptila crassirostris)
which we found perching on ledges and nesting in
crevices’. Sagar (1977a) said the “Fulmat Prion”
was found on the Western Chain and that ‘On Rima
nests were found in the NW and NE areas of the
islet. Here large rocks formed 4 jumble over the
solid rock foundations Nests were deep under these
rocks”. Surprisingly, Edgar (1977) wrote that Sugar
had found the “Fairy Prion” on “Snares Islands”
and Sagar’s report (1977b) of the birds found during
his expedition to the Snares included no mention of
Fairy or Pulmar Prions, J, Warham (pers. comm.
1976) said that he is not aware of any specimens. of
crassirosiris taken from the Western Chain of the
Snares. Therefore it ts difficult to assess whether
typical crassirostris do in fact breed there,
Tt is known that prions of the Western Chain and
the main Shares Island have similar nesting habitats
und preferences, and that they probably breed at the
same time Sagar (19774) reported that Fulmar
Prions on the Western Chain had eggs on 21
November, and Warham (1967) reported that Fairy
Prions had chicks on the main island in January-
February (see below —''Differences in Breeding
Times"). Therefore the only difterences between the
birds must be morphological. Photographs of nesting
Fairy Prions trom Mownau I. and from Snares 1.
published by Serventy et al. (1971: Figs 62 and 139)
shaw that birds from both localines have very similar
bills, Furthermore, another photograph of two
Fulmar Prions at the Western Chain of the Snares,
published by Fleming and Baker (1973), depicts a
bird with a bill that is certainly too slender for a
typical crassirostris, albiel rather unclear. Because
Motunau J. prions vary, and some are not separable
fram crassirostris, While others are indistinguishable
from turtur (see below—'Comparative Morphol-
ony”), the evidence strangly suggests that the Snares
Group alsa contains one variable form of Fairy
Prion, ft is further jnteresting that there are no
teports of two different forms breeding during single
expeditions to the Snures, or to the Antipodes Is.
Where two forms have also been reported to breed
(see below); this aspect suggests that the prions have
been indiseriminately identified as either furtur or
CPASSIFOSITIS,
P.. crassirostris eatant (Mathews, 1912): Heard T,
(Falla 1937; Downes et al 1959) and Auckland Is,
(Falla et al. 1946), Also, possibly on the Antipodes
Is. (see below).
May, 1980
Although Condon (1975) listed fles Kerguelen as
a breeding ground, only one bird (the type of eatoni)
is known from this locality (Derenne e7 al, 1974) and
there ig no evidence of breeding.
P.c.crassirostris. (Mathews, 1912): Bounty Is.
(Falla 1940),
P. crassirostris pyramidalis Fleming, 1939:
Pyramid Rock, possibly Forty Fours islets and
probably The Sisters islets of the Chatham Group
(Fleming 1939: Falla 1940; Dawson 1955).
Dawson (1955) found that burrows on the eastern
Sister islet contained ‘two almost fully-fledged young
of the Chatham fulmar prion’, Whether these birds
Were crassirostris or turtur is open to doubt. They
were found in ‘burrows’ at the end of January, which
indicates, if one followed Fleming’s assertions (1941)
that turtur breeds earlier than crassirosiis, that they
were furmr which came from egys laid in mid-
October (sec below—'Differences in Breeding.
Times’). Also, crassirastris, at all other localities
Where it is known to breed, nests in rock crevices,
undec boulders, or in similar sites, and is not known
to nest in ‘burrows’. Hawever, the identilication of
many prions breeding in the Chatham proup is
questionable, because A, Wright stated (pers.
comm, 1975) that during extensive work on these
istands he found many prions that were not
distinguishable as mirtur or ¢rassirostris,
Antipodes Is.: Whether turiur or crassiroytris or
both breed at the Antipodes Is_ is unconfirmed,
Many writers have stated that one or hoth forms
breed on these islands, but their souree of
information is. obsture. Both are little known from
this locality and Dr J. Warham (pers. comm. 1976)
Stated that he knows of no specimens actually taken
on land Dr F. C. Kinsky (pers comm. 1976) agreed
that none Was known to have been taken on hind,
bul suggested that turtyr does breed there, because
twa specimens, taken On board ship anchored close
io the rocky shoreline in 1950, were in breeding
condition and had ‘naked brood patches,’
Although Oliver (1955) said of Bounty Is. birds
(erassirustris) that ‘this subspecies was found
breeding at Antipades Island in 1902,' it seems that
his statement Stems trom two specimens that are in
the Canterbury Museum. Waite (1909) mentioned
these specimens, and Falla (1940) gave their
registration numbers as 1200.1. Two crassirasiris
labelled *Antipodes Is.’ are in the Canterbury
Museum. Both are dated 1949, but this date
probably is when their registration numbers were
changed ta CMC AVI208 and CMC AV1247,
because they appear to be very old and were once
mounted; doubtless, they are the same two
specimens mentioned by Waite and Falla. Interest-
ingly, Wajte also said that a specimen of ~Prion
BREEDING DISTRIBUTION AND TAXONOMY OF THE PRIONS 45
desolatus’ was obtained at the Antipodes Is. in
February 1907; but this specimen was probably
either turtur or crassirastris (its present location is mot
known) because Waite said “Captain Bollens tells me
thal this Prion breeds in crevices in racks at the
Bounty Islands’ (which implies it was not found
breeding at the Antipodes [s.) and he listed the
desolata of Auckland Is. as ‘Prion banksii,
Oliver (1955) listed specimens of turiur taken at
the Antipodes Is. on 31 July 1924 and in November
7950. Ti is unlikely that the July specimen was
hreeding, for that month is outside the normal
breeding season, and the 1950 birds are those which
were taken aboard ship. Of two specimens
examined, one (DMW 17222) is lahelled ‘off
Antipodes Is,’ and dated 21 November 1972, and the
other (DMW DMS5615) is a bird listed by Oliver,
labelled ‘Antipodes Is.” and dated 6 November
1950—one of the birds taken aboard ship.
From these data ali one can say is that both farms
have been collected cither on or near the Antipodes
Is. There is therefore a possibility they do breed at
this locality, but Warham added (lve. cit.) that a
recent thorough search of the islands during the
breeding season failed to find any prions. Sumimuriz-
ing, it seems that all reports of these prions at the
Antipodes Is. stem from two crassirastris taken, not
necessarily on land, in 1902, a doubrfully identified
specimen taken in 1907, a single rurtur taken wutside
the breeding season in 1924, and a few other /urtur
taken at Jater dates over the nearby sea.
Consequently there are no grounds to suggest both
torms breed sympatrically at the Antipodes Ls.
P. belcheri (Mathews, 1912); Falkland Is.
(Cawkell and Hamilton 1961), Tle de PEst of
Archipel Crozet (Despin et al. 1972) and Hes
Kerguelen (Falla 1937, Derenne et al. 1974). Also.
possibly on Staten 1. and offshore islets of Tierra del
Fuego (Harper 1972), and the remains of birds were
found in the nests of the Great Skua Stercorarius
skua on South Georgia (Watson 1975),
Serventy er al. (1971) and Condon (1975) listed
Bouversya as a breeding ground of helehert, but
Fleming (1941) and Tickell (1962) suggested that
“nly desolara breeds there. Holgersen (1960) did not
list prions in his review of the birds of Bouvetoya,
and Jaler papers by Solyanik (1964) and Holdgate er
al. (1968) are probably significant in that they do not
mention prions breeding or seen On Bouvetwya.
Most desolata breed on islands in the Antarctic
Zone, and Murphy (1936) said, without evidence but
merely because Bouvetpya is in the Antarctic Zone.
that desolata presumably breed on Bouvetoya. Later
confusion has doubtless resulted from such conjec-
ture.
P. d. desolara (Gmelin, 1789): Tles Kerguelen
(Tickell 1962).
P. desoluta banksi Smith, 1840: South Georgia. 5,
Orkney [s. and Heard J, (Tickell 1962).
P. desolata alter (Mathews, 1912): Auckland Is.
and Macquarie J, (Tickell, 1962),
P.desolata subsp.; Tle de l'Est of Archipel Croze|
(Despin ef al. 1972); 8, Sandwich Is,, §.Shetland Ts.,
Scott 1, (Harper 1972, Watson 1975) and Cape
Denison of Antarctica (Falja 1937).
Falla (1937) listed three specimens collected at
Cape Denison in 1913, and wrote that five birds
were seen and three eggs found. In January 1931, he
sighted. one bird flying towards land in the evening,
There are no further reports of desolata at this
locality, Watson (1975) wrote that the Cape Deniscm
population is “possibly extirpated.”
P.s.salvini (Mathews, 1912): Marion and Prince
Edward fs, (van Zinderen Bakker 1971).
P.salvini crozeri (Mathews, 1932); Archipel
Crozet (Despin et al, 1972).
P.vitrata nraceillivrayi (Mathews 1912): Me Saint-
Paul and fle Anssterdam (Mathews 1912; Falla
1940). According to Watson (1975) the last
population 1s “probably extirpated” and subject to
offshore stacks being searched, only a few birds may:
still breed on fle Saint-Paul,
P v.villata (Forster, 1777): The Tristan da Cunha
Group and Gough 1. (Murphy 1936, Swales 1965);
the mainland coasts of Faoveaux Strait and south
western fiords of South I., New Zealand. islets off
Stewart I. Snares Is. and the Chatham Group
(Fleming 1939, Richdale 1965, Falla er al. 1966).
Also, two vittata were collected in the Falkland fs,
(Cawkell and Hamilton 1961).
Condon (1975) followed Clancy (1965) in listing
South Georgia as a breeding ground of vittala
However, Murphy (1936) considered that desolata
of South Georgia had been confused With virtara and
that this mistake in identfication was subsequently
carric¢d on by others through quotation. But both
Murphy and Clancy listed vi/rara as breeding on the
Auckland Is, This locality was not listed by Falla
(1940), Falla er al. (1966), Serventy er al. (1971),
Condon (1975) and Watson (1975). According to
Tickell (1962) desolata breeds on South Georgia and
the Auckland Is.
(b) COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGY
All prions have white underparts, a pale
superciliary, bluc-grey ear coverts and upperparts
with a dark ‘'M" acrass the wings and rump, a black
terminal tail patch, bright blue feet with paler webs,
96 REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18(4): 91-121
and blue-grey or dark grey bills. Their bills are
diverse in shape and have a row of comb-like
lamellae inside the cutting edges of the upper
mandibles. These lamellae are well-developed in
broader-billed forms but are often present only as
rudimentary ridges in narrower-billed forms.
Two groups of prions are readily recognisable: the
fairy prions (turtur and crassirostris) and the whale-
birds (belcheri, desolata, salvini and vittata). The
usage of these vernaculars follows Murphy (1936).
In many cases prions of each group are separable
by bill characteristics only. Compared with whale-
birds, most fairy prions have stouter (shorter and
turtur
turtur
as
oad
as
at
ee
SAM B20293
LAWRENCE ROCKS. aust
DMW 14479
POOR KNIGHTS 15,,NZ
MNHN C.G. 1956 No. 127!
SLES KERGUELEN
belcheri
BMNH 1932.7 2.17
FALKLAND IS,
belcheri
BMNH 1932.72. 2)
FALKLAND 1S.
belcheri
AMNH 792675
FALKLAND IS.
belcheri
May, 1980
deeper) bills with a proportionately larger and more
bulbous dertrum. The exceptions are some turtur
that have bills closely resembling those of some
belcheri (Fig. 2: cf Al, A2, B1), or, in external
appearances only, even those of some desolata.
Birds of both groups are more easily recognisable by
marked differences in the amount of black on their
tails and slightly different head plumage colorations.
PLUMAGE PATTERNS
There are three plumage patterns evident in the
prions: (1) fairy prions have a large area of black on
the tail and a fairly uniform pale head and facial
pattern; (2) whale-birds have a small area of black
56 :
—=a(
me
==
sae =
Fig. 2.—Bills of some fairy prions and whale-birds compared to
show that some birds of each prion group have similar bills.
In this and subsequent illustrations of prion bills, the
drawings were all made direct from specimens. The bills of
some specimens were not set properly in preparation or,
since they have dried, shrinkage of the bill plates has caused
distortion, These aspects were copied to achieve a true
representation of the specimens. In life the nasal tubes of
prions are soft and, consequently, after death they gain a
variety of shapes which are not indicative of distinctions.
BREEDING DISTRIBUTION AND TAXONOMY OF THE PRIONS 97
on the tail; of the latter belcheri has a prominent
white superciliary and facial area contrasting with a
dark blue-grey crown and ear coverts, and a pale
grey back; desolata, salvini and vittata usually have a
darker facial area, back and sides of breast.
Examples of these plumage patterns are shown in
Figures 3 and 4. These patterns are usually constant,
but some desolata have plumage indistinguishable
from some belcheri.
Tail Patterning
SAM B30285 and SAM B30288 (Fig. 3) are beach-
washed specimens of turtur and belcheri respectively,
prepared with spread tail feathers to show the
differences in uppertail patterning between the two
ah
M/
prion groups. Watson (1975) incorrectly showed in
illustrations that fairy prions differ from whale-birds
by having black extending in a broad band across the
outer rectrices. All prions have pale grey outer
rectrices.
The black terminal tail patch of fairy prions
extends for about half the tail length on the upper
surfaces of the inner rectrices. Specimens examined
from all populations have the outer rectrices wholly
pale grey and the second outer pair have a trace of
black on the ends of the inner vanes only. The inner
pairs have progressively larger areas of black with
that of the central feathers underlying the ends of
the uppertail coverts, the extreme tips of which are
also sometimes blackish.
Fig. 3—P. turtur SAM B30285 with typical tail pattern of fairy
prions (left) and P. belcheri SAM B30288 with typical tail
pattern of whale-birds (right). Note the grey outer rectrices
in each species and that the black of the tail extends to the
uppertail coverts.
98 REC, S. AUST. MUS. 18(4): 91-121
In whale-birds the terminal tail patch occupies less
than a third of the tail length on the upper surfaces
of the inner rectrices. The two outer pairs of
rectrices are wholly pale grey and the inner rectrices
have progressively larger areas of black, with that of
the central pair extending to the tips of the uppertail
coverts.
Head and Body Coloration
Fairy prions have paler, more uniformly coloured
heads than whale-birds, but like belcheri have a pale
May, 1980
grey back (fig. 4). The fore part of the crown of fairy
prions is usually slightly, but distinctly mottled, and
the dark coloration of their ear coverts, while
variable, is usually not extensive. The sides of their
breasts, flanks and undertail coverts are lightly
coloured blue-grey, and on some specimens this
colour extends over the abdominal feathers; this last
feature being particularly noticeable on some
Falklands Is. and Pyramid Rock (Chathams Group)
specimens.
Fig. 4—Head and back coloration of P. belcheri (SAM B30288,
left), P. turtur (SAM B30285, middle) and P. vittata subsp.
(SAM B29293, right). Note: these are selected examples to
illustrate basic differences; some vittata have paler plumage
than the specimen shown.
Harper (1972) correctly illustrated belcheri as
having white lores and a brvuad superciliary, which,
in all specimens I examined, contrasts with a
uniform dark blue-grey crown and ear coverts. He
also stated that desolata differs from belcheri by
having darker breast markings and ‘‘M”’ pattern
across the wings and rump, mottled grey lores and a
much smaller pale superciliary.
Specimens of belcheri and desolata that I
examined from populations studied by Harper
usually showed the differences he describe; but some
desolata had intermediate plumage colorations.
Tickell (1962) published photographs of desolata
showing a broad white superciliary, and fles
Kerguelen desolata are often indistinguishable from
belcheri by plumage. For example, fles Kerguelen
desolata’ BMNH_ 80.11, 18.687a and BMNH
80.11.18.647g and Falkland Island belcheri BMNH
1932.7.2.21 and BMNH 1932.7.2.17 were critically
examined and could not be differentiated by
plumage coloration. Therefore, the two forms are
not so clearly identifiable as Harper believed, and
extreme caution must be used in separating them by
plumage features alone.
Fleming (1941) stated that salvini and vittata have
darker plumages than desolata, but Harper and
Kinsky (1974) did not differentiate them by plumage
coloration. There was little difference between these
forms in specimens examined, except for a tendency
for larger-billed birds to be darker; but there is much
variation, For example, of two vittata collected on
fle Saint-Paul by the same person, one (MNHN
RREEDING DISTRIBUTION AND TAXONOMY OF THE PRIONS 99
C.G. 1875 No. 112) has white lores slightly mottled
grey and a prominent white superciliary, while the
other (MNHN C.G. 1875 No. 115) has almost
wholly grey lores and very little white above the cye,
making the head appear almost uniformly grey.
The six examples cited above are typical of many
specimens examined. Most fles Kerguelen desolora
are indistinguishable by plumage from_ belcheri,
whereas desolata from other populations usually are
separable. Other whale-birds, from one or different
populations, vary in depth of plumage colour like
most desolata,
THE FAIRY PRION GROUP
Many island populations of these prions have been
characterised by bill distinctions. Consequently two
species are generally recognised: northern slender-
billed turtur and southern stout-billed crassirosrris.
Following descriptions of Falla (1937), Fleming
(1941) and Fullagar (1972) 1 previously stated (Cox
1976) that crassirostris is distinguishable from turtur
by having a dertrum lacking an angular ridge,
bulbous latericorns and a bill appearing bowed
outwardly when viewed from above. Subsequent
examination of specimens from most known
_
a
breeding localities of both forms showed that this
definition was incorrect. [ndividuals of cach farm
can have dertra the same size and shape, and bowed
or straight bill outlines when viewed dorsally. Only
smaller-billed examples of turtur have an angular
ridge along the top of the dertrum, An immature
from Marion Island (SAFM 559546) has this ridge.
but an adult olf smaller hill size (SAFM 21881) and
an adult of larger bill size (SAFM 55954a) from the
same island have larger, evenly rounded dertra,
Because many immatures (mainly beach-washed
specimens) possess this angular ridge and most
adults from all breeding localities have rounded
dertra, it seems that the character is usually a sign of
immaturity which may persist in some narrow-billed
adults. Fleming (1941) stated that) width and
bulbosity of prion bills develops with age.
There has been much confusion in differentiating
lurtur and crasstrostris, particularly in beach-washed
specimens. The often quoted first Australian record
of crassirostris (Learmonth 1957) was questioned by
Robinson (1972), with whom | agree that it was an
incorrect identification, This specimen (NMV
B6840) and CSIRO 14670 (which is also alleged to
be an Australian crassirosiris (MeKean and Lewis
1971)) are illustrated in Figure 5 for comparison with
drawings of specimens from breeding grounds.
- MMV Baadd
oO
— ~‘,
ee
=
(e=
Portland, Victoria
CHRO M670
40m E Moruya Heads,
NSW
(f=
~
Fig. S—Australian
specimens
i.
ol
wer ss —_ ul
ae
of jurtur that have been
(erroneously?) identified as crassirostris. The lower specimen
was prepared with its bill open at the gape, giving itu stouler
appearance, which possibly resulted in it being wrongly
identified, The drawing was made with it clamped shut,
Which reduced the artificial stoutness,
NMV B6840) more resembles Australian or northern
New Zealand turtitr than other forms, and CSIRO
14670 resembles some specimens from Heard Is.
currently classified as crassirostris, but often
indistinguishable from some turtur, Other specimens
alleged to be crassirostris from Australia that were
examined are also incorrectly identified or are not
recognisable, including one described by myself
(Cox 1976).
Identifications of specimens from breeding col-
onies have also been doubted. When describing
Falkland Is. turtur, Strange (1968) said Dr. R. C,
Murphy and Dr, D. Amadon had confirmed his
identification and furthermore had found the
specimens to be inseparable from smaller-billed
turtur of New Zealand; but Watson (1975), when
citing Strange, said either turtur or crassirosiris
breeds on the Falkland Is.
100
Harper and Kinsky (1978) listed both turtur and
crassirostris as breeding on the Falkland Is. Harper
said (pers. comm., January 1979) their statements
were based on specimens in AMNH and birds seen
at sea. However, only one colony is known to exist
on the Falkland Is, and specimens from it (detailed
below and almost certainly those examined by
Harper) are morphological intermediates that have
the alleged characters of both taxa. It would be easy
to identify individual specimens as either form; but it
FALKLAND IS
turtur?
HEARO »
REC, S$. AUST. MUS, 18(4): 91-121
AMNH 808833
FALKLAND 1S
turtur ?
AMNH 786638
NMV B2898
crassirostris
May, 1980
would not be easy to believe that such specimens
could occur in one mixed colony as separate entities,
Bill Characters
Most published descriptions of the bills of turtur
and crassirostris are subjective. Their classification as
two species was largely based on such descriptions.
The purpose here, in illustrating many of their bills,
is to reduce this subjectivity by showing actual bill
shapes.
<a ae
7 DMW 14902 i
| MOrUNAL |. NZ .
Pr} turtur
eh
1 i
(a :
fo DMW. 17222
/ ANTIPODLS 1s .
ut turtur ee
Po ae ‘ ee ee ‘
ara gts soe Me;
= Ts
—_——
. CMC AVI241
Lo MANGERE ) CHATHAMS:
/ turtur we
cS =a
<=
_ it \ Er | A8
[< }——— ———
Fig. 6—The bills of two Falkland Is. turtur compared with other
turtur specimens and a Heard J. crassirastris.
Two Falkland Is. specimens (AMNH 808833 and
AMNH 786638) have bills similar to some Motunau
I. (New Zealand) turtur (Fig. 6: cf. A3, A4, A6).
They also closely resemble some Antipodes Is.,
Mangere Is. (Chathams) and Cook Strait turtur, and
some Heard I. crassirostris (Figs. 6 and 7: cf. AS, A7,
Al0, All).
Variation in the bills of Heard IJ. (Figs. 6 and 8:
AS, A16, A19) and Motunau I. birds (Figs 6 and 9:
A6, A15, A23), and in other populations of which
examples are illustrated, shows that it is extremely
doubtful whether all turtur and crassirostris are
distinguishable. Some Mangere Is., Antipodes Is.
and Motunau I. turtur closely resemble some Heard
BREEDING DISTRIBUTION AND TAXONOMY OF THE PRIONS 101
DMW 18454
PYRAMID ROCK, CHATHAMS
crassirostris
NMV BIl438
LADY JULIA PERCY | AUST
turtur
DMW 9296 _
LIGHTHOUSE BROTHERS |,
COOK STRAIT Nz
turtur
DMW 18091
MANGERE |, CHATHAMS
turtur
DMw 18090
MANGERE |, CHATHAMS
turtur
DMW 18454
PYRAMID ROCK, CHATHAMS
crassirostris
Fig. 7—Two Mangere Is. rurtur compared with an Australian and
a New Zealand turfur, and two Pyramid rock crassirastris,
Mangere Is, specimens have stouter bills than many other
turtur, and, in bill characteristics, approach the form of
Pyramid Rock crassirosiris. The aciual bill lengths of
Mangere Is. and Pyramid rock specimens are similar.
and Auckland Is. crassirostris (Figs. 6 and 8: cf. AS,
Ao, A7, A8, Al5, Al6, A17, Al8, A19). Some
specimens of crassirostris from the Bounty Is.,
Pyramid Rock (Chathams) and Antipodes Is. are
very similar to each other (Fig. 10: cf. A29, A30,
A31), although Falla (1940) recognised each of their
populations as a different subspecies. Birds of these
populations sometimes also closely resemble Heard
and Auckland Is. crassirostris (Figs. 8 and 10: cf.
A19, A20, A27, A28).
While the bill shapes of turtur and crassirostris
cannot be used to distinguish many specimens, of
greatest critical interest are the characters of
differing populations that breed in close proximity,
Fleming (1939) described the largest form of
crassirostris from the Chatham Group breeding on
Pyramid Rock, approximately 17 km from turtur,
breeding on Mangere Is.
Like most southern New Zealand turtur, some
Mangere Is. birds closely resemble some crassirostris
and differ from Australian and northern New
Zealand turtur by usually having stouter bills with
more rounded dertra (Figs. 2, 6 and 7: cf. Al, A2,
A8, All, Al2). They therefore have somewhat
intermediate bill characteristics.
Pyramid Rock crassirostris differ from Mangere Is.
turtur by having broader and deeper bills with more
bulbous dertra. But the bills of both vary and
differences in the width and depth correspond to the
size of their dertra. The actual bill lengths of both
forms are similar, as illustrated in Figure 7 (A11,
102 REC. S, AUST. MUS. 18(4): 91-121
A1l2, Al3, Al4), which also shows that their bill
differences are not always significant.
Dimensions of Fairy Prions
The dimensions of specimens examined and those
listed by Buddle (1941), Despin et al. (1972), Falla
(1937, 1940), Fleming (1939), Richdale (1944) and
Wood-Jones (1937) are compared in Figure 11,
which shows mean and range of measurements.
Although few specimens are known from some
breeding grounds, the dimensions of birds from
some separate localities clearly differ. Notably,
Pyramid Rock crassirostris have absolutely longer
wings and wider and deeper bills than Mangere Is.
turtur. Also, Bounty Is. crassirostris is not a small
maTUNAU 1 Ne
turtur
NMV B4667
HEARD
DMW 14908
May, 1980
form as stated by Condon (1975), because, though
smaller than Pyramid Rock birds in mean bill and
wing measurements, its dimensions are all greater
than those of Heard I. and Auckland Is. crassirostris,
Differences between the mean dimensions of 15
Pyramid Rock and seven Bounty Is. crassirostris (0-5
bill-depth, 0-9 bill-width, 0-9 culmen, 5-5 wing
length) are so small that they are unlikely to have
much taxonomic significance (especially because the
data are from only 22 specimens) and _ surely
constitute insufficient evidence for subspecific
differentiation as Fleming (1939) proposed by
naming Pyramid Rock birds P. c. pyramidalis after
examining only 14 specimens, Furthermore,
although there is no evidence that the specimens
represent random samples of each population, the
Ss
ae Ns)
crassirostris
CMC AVI242
MANGLRL |, CHATHAMS
furtur
/ DMW. 17498
/ AUCKLAND 15
crassirostris
NMV B6284
HEAR |
crassirostris
} DMW 18426
oo BOUNTY thy
/ crassirostris Pai
pe =—{ A2O
eo Be
SS
/
Fig. 8—Heard I. crassirostris (A16) have bills very similar to
Motunau I. and Mangere I. turtur, or (A19), very similar to
Auckland Is. and Bounty Is. crassirostris.
BREEDING DISTRIBUTION AND TAXONOMY OF THE PRIONS 103
fo SAFM 21881
f
turtur 1
—. :
ra iar —
~
/ SAFM 559544
marion |
turtur 22
(-E \
~~
ie DMW (4906
MOTUNAUL | rie
turtur
ao =
a SK
DMW DM5615
ANENOBES. 15
turtur
gs ~ —
NMY BIlg64
MACOUAHIE |
turtur
——_s
=
MW 14457
POOR KNIGHTS 15 Na
turtur
Fig. 9—Examples of turtur bills from various populations. The
similarity of these specimens suggests that races cannot be
distinguished by bill characteristics.
means of the bill width, bill depth, culmen and wing
measurements of four crassirostris from Pyramid
Rock and seven from Bounty Is. were tested on the
hypothesis that for each character the means of the
two populations would be equal. This was done with
a t-test after assuming that each of the four
characters is normally distributed in both popu-
lations and also after having tested the hypothesis,
again for each character, that the variances from
both populations would be equal (Table 1). At the
conventional 95% level, bill width was the only
character for which the means were found to
significantly differ. However, because this character
is only indicative of a very small difference between
the populations, and the samples were extremely
small, with the added problems such as measuring
the bills so finely, it is felt that it would be premature
at this stage to attach any nomenclatural significance
to the statistical result.
The two specimens of crassirostris alleged to be
from the Antipodes Is. are also better classified with
Pyramid Rock and Bounty Is. birds, for their bills
have very similar proportions but are slightly
narrower, suggesting immaturity, Also, one (CMC
AV1247) is otherwise doubtfully distinguishable
from some Bounty Is. specimens, while the other
(CMC AV1208, Fig. 10: A29) only differs from
specimens of both populations by having shorter
wings (by 4:0). However, their age when collected
cannot be established, because the collecting dates
are unknown; only one (male) is sexed, without
mention on its label of gonadal condition, and,
judging from. plumage condition, they are old and
have been handled frequently; consequently, plum-
age wear is difficult to ascertain. If they are
immature (therefore non-breeding) the shorter
wings of one have little bearing on their
classification.
104 REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18(4): 91-121 May, 1980
TABLE 1
eee
Pyramid Rock Bounty Islands
=4
n= n=7
Mean (Range) Mean (Range) Variances F ty Significance
a
Billdepth ............-..... 8-58 8-17 Equal 1-64 2-156 0-1>P>0.05
(8-2-8-7) (7-8-8-8)
Bill width ................., 12-45 11-07 Equal 3-33 3-00 0:02>P>0-01
(11-8-12-9) (10-3-12-6)
Culitiert. atittaactiegr¢etaa 23-35 22:79 Equal 1-87 1-44 P>0-1
(22:7-24-3) (21-6-23)
WYER oi ee fates eA EE 192-5 187-57 Equal 8-99 1-63 P>0-1
(190-194) (180-197)
DMW 17500
AUCKLAND IS,
crassirostris
DMW 0M5604
BOUNTY (S
crassirostris é
CMC AVI208
ANTIPODES iS.
crassirostris |
DMW 17286
BOUNTY JS,
crassirostris
DMW 18455
PYRAMID ROCK, CHATHAMS
crassirostris
NMV BII963
MACQUARIE |
turtur
Fig. 10—Examples of crassirostris that have similar bills, and the
dimensions numbered on A32 correspond to the measure-
ments given in Table 2.
Most Pyramid Rock, Bounty Is. and Antipodes Is. because they appear to be intermediates. Many have
crassirostris can be separated from all other fairy stout bills, thus closely resembling crassirostris or
prions by having a bill depth of over 8-0; but Heard some turtur, but the dimensions of specimens are
I, and Auckland Is. birds present a difficult problem closer to those of turtur (Fig. 11).
BREEDING DISTRIBUTION AND TAXONOMY OF THE PRIONS
BILL-DEPTH & WIDTH
FALKLANDS
MARION
cROZETS”
AUSTRALIA
POOR KNIGHTS(NZ) +
COOK STR. IS. }
MANGERE (Chatham)
turtur
ANTIPODES”
JACQUES LEES(NZ)
WHERO 1, (NZ)
MACQUARIE”
MOTUNAU 1.(NZ)
HEARD i.
AUCKLANDS
ANTIPODES*
BOUNTY IS.
crassirostris
PYRAMID ROCK
(Chathams}
¥ - Breeding uncertain
105
SPECIMENS
200
CULMEN WING
180 190
—s ok
BOO @wWWNM
=
—_—
Sn
aw nn © ~ PM
Fig. 11—Dimensions of fairy prions (mean and range).
Falkland Is., Marion 1., Australian and New
Zealand furtur specimens have slight dimensional
differences, but more material is needed before
assessments of their relationships can be made. Falla
et al, 1966 said Antipodes Is, furtur are a small!
subantarclic race, but the few specimens of
uncertain natal origin are similar to many other
turtur (Figs. & and 9; A7, A24) and cannot be
recognised as distinct. The type of fallai, taken at
sea near South J., New Zealand, is a young bird just
out of nestling down (Falla 1940) and also cannot be
recognised,
THE WHALE-BIRDS
Although it is extremely difficult, if not
impossible, to distinguish many desolata from
salvini, Falla (1940) and Fleming (1941) followed
Mathews (1912) in listing belcheri and desolata in a
separate subgenus from salvini and vittata, Fleming
gave the subgeneric characters of belcheri and
desolata as: ‘Long bill with straight outlines, viewed
from above, Palatal lamellae become obsolete some
distance behind the dertrum and are invisible when
the bill is closed. Plumage pale grey, and head
pattern moderately distinct,’ and those of salvini
and vittata: ““Large very broad bill with bowed
outlines, Palatal lamellae extending all the way from
gape to dertrum and visible even when bill is closed.
Plumage dark and head pattern well defined.”’ He
also said, “the reality of the subgeneric grouping can
be emphasised by drawing the bill of one species in a
network of Cartesian co-ordinates, and by Tepre-
senting the same co-ordinates on similar drawings of
other species,"’ By this method he suggested that
helcheri and desolata have bills based on a different
“plan” to those of salvini and vittata.
However, the plumage characters (detailed
previously) of desolata and salvini are not different
and the bill characters of both intergrade, indicating
that the subgeneric prouping is wrong, Furthermore,
Fleming’s representation of the bill of desolata in
Cartesian co-ordinates is not true of most desolala,
because only a minority (typically fles Kerguelen
birds) have straight cutting edges to their upper
mandibles as he depicted. Their bills in fact usually
have curved cutting edges (beneath which their
lamellae are often visible) and are very similar to
those of salvini (Figs, 14 and 15: ef. BIS, B17, B19,
B20, B21. B23, B24), Many desolata also have
bowed bill outlines viewed dorsally (Figs. 12, 14 and
15: B13, B16, B19, B21, B22) and their lamellae are
often visible when the bill is closed (also see Tickell
1962) and usually extend inside the bill as far as the
dertrum. The lamellae in desolata, salvini and vittata
are large at the gape and progressively diminish in
size towards the dertrum, as described by Murphy
(1936) for vittata, but in narrower-billed desolata
specimens they are usually present only as
rudimentary ridges towards the dertrum and closely
resemble those of belcheri, also described by
Murphy. Irrespective of natal origin, adult speci-
mens of desolata, salvini and vittata with wider and
more bowed bills also tend to have larger lamellae.
106
in
and
In whale-birds the major problems are
recognising belcheri from some desolata,
recognising desolata and vittata from salvini.
Bill Characters of Narrower-billed Whale-Birds
Although bill measurements of allopatric popu-
lations of belcheri and desolata overlap slightly, both
forms are clearly separable except in their
populations of fles Kerguelen and fle de l'Est,
Archipel Crozet.
Falla (1937) identified fles Kerguelen belcheri and
desolata by bill shape and said specimens of each
form with ‘“‘exactly the same”’ bill dimensions could
NMV 83133
ILES KENGULLEN
beicheri
ILES KERGUELEN
belcheri
NMV B2902
ILES KERGUELEN
belcheri
NMV B4674
ILES KERGUELEN
desolata?
NMV B4673
ILES KERGUELEN
desolata?
NMV B4676
desolata
NMV B467!
LES KERGUELEN
desolata
(LES KERGUELEN
desolata
REC. 8. AUST. MUS. 18(4): 91-121
MNHN CG. 1969 No 925
ILES KERGUELEN
May, 1980
only be recognised by the ‘‘compression of the
maxillae in P.belcheri and consequent — slight
concavity of outline when viewed dorsally."’ He
described two desolata populations on_ the
archipelago: A—a wide-billed form, and B—a
narrow-billed form. Of form B he said that “At the
time of collecting I regarded these birds as a new
form and a possible hybrid between P.desolata and
P.belcheri, but subsequent examination of the
specimens shows that they possess none of the
distinctive characters of P.belcheri, and are certainly
referable to P.desolata.”’ Tickell (1962) used Falla’s
measurements from these two forms and concluded
that fles Kerguelen desolata are a narrow-billed
subspecies.
BMNH 80.1! 18.687
B12
fn BMNH 80.1..18, 647 A
ae ES KE! =
wae _ — “dasolata <2 B13
Fig. 12—The intergradation of bill characteristics of belcheri and
desolata of fles Kerguelen.
BREEDING DISTRIBUTION AND TAXONOMY OF THE PRIONS
The bill dimensions of all three forms from fles
Kerguelen and belcheri from the Falkland Is. are
plotted separately in Figure 13, which also shows the
means and range in bill size of other desolata (from
Tickell 1962), and the known bill size variation of
belcheri. There is little difference between fles
Kerguelen form A and desolata of other breeding
localities in the mean or variation of bill size. Form
B is intermediate between form A and belcheri (i.e.
intermediate between desolata and belcheri).
24 25 26 27
CULMEN LENGTH
A —FORM A
107
The bill shapes of fles Kerguelen belcheri and
desolata are also variable, and this variation is shown
by drawings of their bills in Figure 12 (B5-B13).
Some desolata have bowed outlines to their bills
(B12, B13) while others have straight outlines (B10,
B11). Some belcheri do not show a slight concavity in
their dorsally viewed bill outline; NMV B3133 (BS)
with a bill width of 8-7 has a slightly bowed outline.
Falla (1937) did not elaborate on “the distinctive
characters of P.belcheri’’ beyond their bill shape, and
28 29 30 31 mm
i
fT
Lo
2
Oo
4
aN
B—FORM -} Pdesolata, Iles Kerguelen (Falla 1937) o — specimens examined.
a — P belcheri, Iles Kerguelen; O — Falkland Is.
e@—disputed specimens
Pdesolata- mean bill sizes: Py —Heard I, He =S. Georgia, Ay —Macquarie I, r= 5. Orkney Is..
hr) —Auckland Is. (Tickell 1962)
Fig. 13—Bil! dimensions of belcheri and desolata. Solid lines
illustrate the known size variation of each form, and keyed
symbols the size of individual specimens. Note the bill size of
fles Kerguelen form B is intermediate between form A and
belcheri, and that form A is similar in mean bill size to other
desolata populations.
10s
it seems that he only found concavity io the bill
outlines of his specimens once they had dried, Also,
live and fresh beach-washed specimens I have
collected had no indication of concave bill outlines
but, when dried, concavity was noticeable. Concav-
ity in bill outline can be caused by shrinkage and
consequent inward cantrachion of the latericorns on
drying specimens, BMNH 1932.7.2.17 (fig. 2: B2)
has its bill shghtly swollen at the base and slighdy
concave towards the dertrum; 4 conditian probably
caused by shrinkage.
Differences between Tles Kerguelen belcheri and
desolata are ill-defined, and it is not surprising that
the identifications of some specimens have been
disputed, NMV B4673, NMV 84674 and NMYV
B4676 are labelled desolata from Tles Kerguelen (by
the collector?) but also written on their labels is P.
©, Harper's opinion that they are beleheri, whieh is
indicated as correct by the plots of the specimens in
Figure 13. However, the collector also ohtained
other desolaia al the same Jocality on the
archipelago (NMV 64671, NMW 4672, NMV
B4675 and NMV B467&), and because the drying
hills of some specimens shrink more than others, the
question remains whether Wes Kerguelen birds can
be wWenttied when living. Kinsky and Harper (1968)
stated that under controlled drying conditions the
bill width of adult belcheri shrinks by 5 to 16 per cent
(average |3 per cent). This wide variation in
shrinkape suggests that al least one of the disputed
specimens (NMV B4673) could have been quite
justifiably identified as desolai when collected: it
does nol have concave bill outlines viewed from
ubove, and on the dried skin its bill width measures
116. which 1s within the range of variation of both
torn.
Tickell (1962) found Tles Kerguelen desolata to be
narrower in bill width than other desolata because he
combined the dimensions of forms A and B in his
calculations. But form A closely resembles other
desolara, whereas form B is intermediate between
helchert and desolala- and other specimens from the
archipelago show there is intergradatian of the
characters of bath forms, This evidence suggests
hybridization and. consequently, Tles Kerguelen
deselata should not be classified ay a separate
subspecies,
The measurements of two belcheri from ile de
Est given by Despin ef al. (1972) are: bill width 10-2
and IL-8, culmen Jength 25 und 27) Two desolete
fram the same colony measure 12-5 anc 14-3, and 26
dod 28. Despin ef al said of the helcheri
colonyCette calonie est de trés petites dimensions
-elle ne compte que quelques nids—et trés
nettement délimitee’ (This colony is very small—
only a few nests—and extending over a very limited
area). No other belehert were found on the istand.
REC. 5, AUST. MUS. 18{(4}: 91-121
May, 1980
Furthermore, they said; ‘Le Prion de la Désolation
est apparemment trés peu abondant aL'Ule de |'Est
ou une seule colonic a élé observée, la méme
dailleurs que celle du Prion de Belcher mentionée
précédemment” (The Desolate Prion is apparently
very scarce on East Island where only one colony hus
been observed, the same colony moreover as that of
Belcher’s Prion mentioned above), Because of the
Scunty data few conclusions can be formed,
Nevertheless, the culmen lengths of the two forms
overlap, and the difference in bill width between the
largest belcheri and the smallest desolata 1s only (7.
When the specimens were examined, the two forms
could not be separated by plumage coloratian,
though plumage wear varied. and it was noted that
their dorsally viewed bill outlines intergraded. The
smallest beleheri (MNHN C,G. 1974 No. 1823) has
very shghtly cancave outlines, while the Jargest
(MNHN C.G. 1974 No. 1824) has straight though
slightly swollen outlines. The smallest desolata
(MNHN ©.G. 1974 No, 1816) has very slightly
bowed outlines, and the largest (MNHN C.G. 1974
No, 1815) has obviously bowed outlines. It is
interesting that the former two are both females, and
that the latter are both males. [n bill shape the two
desolata are intermediate between the beleheri and
salvini (MNHWN C,G. 1974 Nos. 1808 and 1809) that
are also fram Jle de VEst. Therefore, as on Tles
Kerguelen, the bill characters of Te de l'Est beleheri
and deselara are inconsistent.
Bill Characters of Wider-billed Whale-Birds
Bill dimensions of 245 specimens are shown in
Figure 16, which is a reduced continuation of Figure
13, [nh must cases smaller-billed deselare were
excluded if their identification from belcheri was
doubtful. The known dimensional limits of desolata,
salvuini and vitrata, derived from specimens and
mejsurements given by Despin er al. (1972), Falla
(1937, 1940), Mathews (1912, 1938), Murphy (1936).
Serventy ef al. (1971), Swales (1965) and Tickell
(1962) are superimposed around the plots of the
individual specmens, and the mean bill dimensions
of separate breeding populations ure given except
those of desolata, which are shown in Figure 13.
Figure 16 shows that (a) there is wide overlap in bil]
dimensions of the three forms; (6) many specimens
have intermediate dimensions; (c) there is a strong
tendency tar birds with a longer culmen to have a
wider bill; and also that saluini is an intermediate
form between desolata and vittata,
Falla (1940) and Fleming (1941) revognised two
subspecies of salvia? (nominate salvin? of Marion T-
and crezeli af Archipel Crozet) because the
specimens available to them suggested that Marion
1. birds have larger bills. However, Despin ef al,
(1972) Jater showed thar Tle de Est salpini have
larger bills (culmen 29-34 (av. 31-6), and bill width
BREEDING DISTRIBUTION AND TAXONOMY OF THE PRIONS
AMS 0.22083
ADELIE LAND, ANTARCTICA
desolata
BMNH 1958.12.10
SOUTH ORKNEY IS.
desolata
salvini
NMV B2891
HEARD |
desolata
MNHN C.G.1974 No. 1807
ARCHIPEL CROZET
109
AMS 0.22082
MACQUARIE 1
desolata
AMS 0.22084
ADELIE LAND, ANTARCTICA
desolata
AMS 0.22085
MACQUARIE |
desolata
B20
Fig. 14—Typical desolata specimens from various populations
compared with a salvini specimen. Note that the cutting edge
to the upper mandible of desolata is usually curved upwards
at the base, in profile view, as in salvini, and that desolata
frequently have bowed bill outlines, viewed dorsally.
15-5-20-5 (18-4) on fresh specimens). It is possible
that vittata macgillivrayi is intermediate between
salvini and vittata (Elliott 1957; Clancy 1965), but in
bill shape two specimens from fle Saint-Paul more
resemble vittata. Their measurements and those of
two others given by Mathews (1938) and Falla (1940)
are: culmen 30-31 and bill width 17-18. Fifteen
presumed beach derelicts measured by Serventy et
al. (1971) are 29-5-34-5 (av. 32-3 ad 16-2-21-5 (18),
and appear smaller than vittata which they measured
as 32-37 (34) and 18-8-22-6 (20-6), but the overlap in
size indicates that many specimens are not
separable. The bulge in outline of dorsally viewed
vittata bills is variable, with some being more evenly
bowed (Fig. 15: cf. B27, B28), and although
macgillivrayi also have a similar bill shape (B25,
B26) the bulge in bill outline is also present in some
salvini and even some desolata (Figs. 14 and 15:
B16, B22). Differences in bill profile between salvini
and vittata suggested by Fullagar (1972) are
inconsistent (Fig. 15). The dertra of salvini and
vittata do appear “weak” (Falla 1940) in proportion
to bill size compared with those of belcheri and
desolata, but in these whale-birds it appears that
differences have evolved through spreading
latericorns and palates without a corresponding
enlargement of the dertra and nasal tubes. In all the
wider-billed whale-birds the dertra and nasal tubes
are of similar size, but with individual variation
(Figs. 14 and 15).
REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18(4): 91-121
BMNH 1958 12.12
SOUTH ORKNEY IS
desolata B21
NMV B2892
HEAM |
desolata
MHNP. C G.1974 No 1776
ARCHIREL CROZET
salvini B23
BMNH 1949.5) 5
MARION |
Salvini
M
INHINC.G B75 112
(LL saint —eaun
vittata
MNHN C.G.1875. (5
ILE SAINT~PAUL
vittata
DMW 13540
CHATHAM 1p
vittata
: B27
Fig. 1S—A comparison of the bills of desolata, salvini and vittata.
Although variation is wide, the bills of each form are
fundamentally similar. B28 has a bill that is larger than that
May, 1980
of average sized wittata.
A further bill characteristic used to separate
salvini and vittata is colour. Watson (1975) said the
bill colour of salvini is “wholly blue” and that of
vittata is “steel gray”’, a difference accepted by most
writers. However, Murphy (1936) said the bill of
vittata is “light blue or bluish grey” and two males
collected on Gough I. in April have their bill colours
labelled as “‘blue-grey’”” (BMNH 1956.36.20) and
“blue (BMNH 1956.36.19). Falla (1937) said New
Zealand vittata have the upper bill ‘glistening iron
grey, with an occasional bluish patch appearing as an
abnormal marking.” Although there is variation, it
seems possible that vittata of the southern Atlantic
region differ slightly in bill colour from New Zealand
birds. But confusion could stem from the fact that
after death the bills of both forms rapidly become
blackish, Specimens of desolata and salvini that |
have collected on beaches have had entirely blackish
bills and eyes not yet shrunken. Narrower-billed
whale-birds on the other hand, have bills which do
not usually turn blackish until they are dry.
Although Falla (1940) and Fleming (1941) said
salvini is more closely related to vittata than to
desolata, and Clancy (1965) and Watson (1975)
listed salvini and vittata as conspecific, there appears
to be no reason, by way of bill size or structure (their
criteria) to support these views. It seems that salvini
consists of an assemblage of slightly differing
populations which are intermediate between desol-
ata and vittata (Fig. 13).
BREEDING DISTRIBUTION AND TAXONOMY OF THE PRIONS Ih
24) 254 26) 27 28 29 30 31
32) 33 34) 35] 36) 37] 38ymm
2
-
é
=
1)
4
=x
a) -5 plus specimens, e- 4, e-3, 4-2,+- I.
salvini: P - POSSESSION; M— MARION; E- ILE DE L’EST.
vittata: S— SAINT-PAUL; C- CHATHAMS; Z-NZ; G- GOUGH.
Fig. 16—Dimensions of the bills of desolata, salvini and vittata,
The known size variation of each form is superimposed
around the plots of individual specimens. the mean bill sizes
of salviniand vittata populations are shown; those of desolata
are shown in Fig. 13. Note the wide overlap in the bill
dimensions of each form, and that many specimens are
intermediate. Unlike
desolam and
vittata, bill sizes of
different salvint populations are inconsistent
Other Characters of Whale-Birds
Bill, tarsus, tail and wing measurements of
specimens from breeding localities are shown in
Figure 17, the data derived from specimens
examined and measurements given by Despin ei al.
(1972), Falla (1937, 1940), Mathews (1912, 1938),
Murphy (1936), Rand (1954), Swales (1965) and
Tickell (1962). The dimensions of each recognized
species overlap with those of one or more of the
other three, and differences are hard to define.
There is a tendency for larger-billed birds to have
their other dimensions larger, but this generalization
does not always hold true.
Some belcheri have the shortest wings but their
measurements widely overlap those of desolata.
However, belcheri usually have a longer tarsus than
those desolata which have only slightly larger bills;
but two specimens of each form collected on fle de
l'Est by Despin et al. (1972) differ from most other
belcheri and desolata in having a longer tarsus. In
REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18(4): 91-121 May, 1980
112
ore
os
‘(aduel pue ueaul) spiig-o[eym Jo suolsuawIg—l] ‘3Iy
—+——
——
+
—|-~
fe
Abs
ae
a
==
its
=
oa
we
4
t
SZ oz St
HLOIM-1118
+
ae
+
OL
SWVHIVHS 8 ZN
2YELIA
HuIAleS
e}ej0sap
14984919q
HONOD
TAVd-LNIVS
41S4.1 30 311
NOISS4SSOd
NOIWVW
GuvaH
AANYYO'S
VIDYO39D ‘S
VOILOYVLNY
SONVTNONV
AIYVNOOVW
1831 30 311
v- N373nN9Yay
g@-N314aNDY3ay
SONV1N1V4
N31S5NDY4ay
1S3q 30 311
BREEDING DISTRIBUTION AND TAXONOMY OF THE PRIONS 113
tarsus measurement the Tle de Est birds more
resemble each other than other populations of each
form, Furthermore, both forms from this small
colony have similar wing lengths, and in all othe
given dimensions the desolata are intermediate
between the belcheri and salvini of the same island,
Therefore, there appears to be little convincing
evidence that at the two localities (fle de l'Est and
fles Kerguelen) where belcheri and desolata both
breed they are morphologically distinct; although
their allopatric populations show fairly clear
interspecific differences. At the Falkland Is,, where
beleheri is the only breeding form, they are distinct
from desolata by their bill width, which is not known
to exceed 11-5, Most desolata can be distinguished
hy having a wider bill and a shorter tarsus,
Tickell (1962) classified South Georgia, S. Orkney
Is, and Heard I. desolata as a different subspecies
from Macquarie I, and Auckland Is. birds because
they have differences in wing and tail lengths,
Nevertheless, these differences are slight and are
probably not indicative of subspecific distinction,
because Macquarie [. desolata are intermediate in
wing and tail length between Auckland Is. and Cape
Denison (Antarctica) desolata, and the latter are
intermediate between Macquarie 1. and Heard 1.
birds. Moreover, Macquarie |. birds more resemble
Heard L. desolata in wing length than birds of the
Auckland Is. Therefore only a minority of
individuals are likely to be identifiable, and Tickell’s
classification of subspecies should be treated with
caution,
The longest-winged birds are vithate. but their
wing measurements Overlap those of salvini by 12
and desolata by 19. Most vita are nevertheless
distinguishable by the combination of long wings and
large biil, because mast longer-winged desolata have
measurably smaller bills. There is little difference in
the bill sizes of Tristan da Cunha, Gough 1. and New
Zealand vittata (Falla 1940, Elliott 1957) and, except
for forms of the southern Indian Ocean region. all
desolata populations haye similar mean bill sizes
(Tickell 1962, Fig. 13). On the other hand, the mean
hill sizes of salviai populations vary, and some
closely resemble desolata while others more
resemble vitrata, The mean bill size of desolata is
approximately 14-5 x 27:5 and vitrata 21 x 34; the
desolata specimens in Figure 14 are typical examples
of their respective populations, and in Figure 15
vitlata B27 represents average size. The similarity of
both forms is shown in Figure 15 (B22, B26, and
others). Murphy (1936) illustrated typical specimens
of cach, but Fleming (1941), followed by Serventy ef
al. (!971), diagrammatically illustrated their bill
characters and showed a viltata with an abnormally
wide bill compared with a desolata of ayerage bill
size, but with an unusually wide dertrum, which
gives the impression that they are vastly different
birds.
(c) ZONES OF INTERGRADATION
At all their proven breeding grounds populations
of iurtur atid erassirostris are allopatric. The different
whale-birds are also allopatric breeders except that
both belcheri and desolata breed on tes Kerguelen
and Despin et al. (1972) reported that belcheri,
desolata and salvini breed on fle de Est, Archipel
Crozet.
The Intergrading Characters of Populations of Fairy
Prions
The fairy prions were classified as two specics
mainly because of differences in the stoutness of
their bills. To ascertain the comparative stautness of
the bills of different populations, a graded series of
six bill dimensions was scored according to index
values from 0 ta 4 (Table 2), A true hybrid index
could not he devised because the measurements are
very small and individuals of the most different
forms someltinies share characteristics, and, conse-
quently, it is very difficult to define phenotypes. Use
of wider scales of dimensions produces less
differences in the mean index values of the various
populations, and they would be barely distunguish-
able.
The measurements required for the bill stoutness
index could only be taken from a rather small sample
of specimens. These measurements (illustrated in
Fig. 10: A32) were: (1) bill width at base, (2) the
width of the maxillary unguis, (3) bill depth from the
base of the nasal tubes, (4) bill depth from the point
in frone of the nostrils, (5) bill depth trom (he top of
the maxillary unguis to the lower angle of the
mandibular unguis, (6) the actual bill length (i.c. mar
culmen Tength). Pertaining fo stoutness, higher
index values were given for greater width and depth
ineasurements, but lesser scores were afforded to
prealer bill length measurements,
The index value of each specimen equals the mean
score of the six dimensions, and the mean index and
per cent value of bill stoutness of populations was
calculated (Table 3). Figure 18 diagrammatically
illustrates geographical variation in the bills of these
prions: cach population is represented by a circle,
which, aecording to its per cent value of bill
stoutness, is partly black. A greater portion of black
indicates populations with stouter bills.
114 REC. S, AUST. MUS. 18(4): 91-121 May, 1980
TABLE 2
Index values according to stoutness of fairy prion bills. Specimens with bills of greater width and depth but lesser length are afforded
higher index values.
Width Depth
Bill Index
from base in front at unguis Length Value
at base of max. of nasal of nostrils
(1) unguis (2) tubes (3) (4) (5) (6)
—10 —4 —9 —7 —7°5 20-6— 0
10:1—10-5 4.]—4.3 9-1 —9-5 7-1—7:5 7-6—8 20:1—20-5 1
10-6—11 4:4—4-6 9-6—10 7-6—8 8:1—8-5 19-6—20 2
11+1—11-5 4-749 10-1—10-5 §-1—8:5 8-6—9 19-1—19.5 3
11-6— s— 10-6— 8-6— 9-1— —19 4
TABLE 3
The comparative bill stoutnesses of fairy prion populations.
No, of birds with index value: Mean Per Cent
Locality 0-1 1-1-2 2-1-3 3-1-4 Index Value
turtur:
Australias wmetenussitseugtohe «shitit edctotencstits see tta tala 7 1 0-66 16-5
Marion hs ss: partecsssactisusittvettoy;titvtes 2 0:71 17:75
Poor Knights Is, -.,.-....-- : eS wen 1 seh et re! 2 2 1-08 27
NESS od OT 2 4 1:27 31-75
Cook Strait Is... _- 2 1-41 35-25
WHETOAG 5 6 och ye seteens 0 she a peigele oncdat po eclebien debate wedi, o's 1 3 | 1:43 35-75
Falk lara Ts. by edscsse 444 oe tose dt eh 2 1-49 37°25
Matunau T,-o SAS so Ca oe ET hes eecee cle 3 I 1:7 4255
crassirostris:
Heatd-£, . 0s yoce bat ssebenreosri: Sse 2 2 2-03 50:75
ACK Nd Ts. 4 oe lyste eset par tela be ce tosdo ne easiegte eta gy shade 1 l 2-33 58-25
(Antipodes Is.) ........ 1 1 2:99 74:75
Bounty Is, ........, Rie FARES sells ecrenn ac ede al 2 2 3-24 81
Pyramid Rock ..........00 00.00 cece eee eee 1 3 3-49 87-25
AUSTRALIA —
KNIGHTS 15S,
——____,»
MANGERE IS.
FALKLAND IS, RYRAMID
ROCK
q << _—_—_ MARION t.
WHERO |.
BOUNTY [S.
=
.
eS
HEARD }. 4S. 3)
Fig. 18—Geographical variation in the bills of fairy prions. The
comparative bill stoutness of each population is indicated by
the percentage of black in the circle representing each.
Stouter-billed forms are indicated by a greater percentage of
black, and by arrows pointing from more slender-billed
forms. Although the Antipodes Is. are not a confirmed
breeding ground, the bill stoutness of two crassirostris said to
be from this locality is indicated to show that they are
intermediate between Auckland Is. and Bounty Is. birds.
BREEDING DISTRIBUTION AND TAXONOMY OF THE PRIONS
Subjective judgments of bill stoutness compliment
the index. Falkland Is. birds have neither a stout nor
a slender bill (fig, 6: A3, A4) and in many respects
appear to be intermediate between turtur and
crassirostris, Stouter-billed birds breed on Heard [.,
and Auckland Is, birds seem intermediate in bill
bulbosity between the birds of Heard |. and
Antipodes or Bounty Is. Fleming (1939) pointed out
that there is a progression towards greater bill
bulbosity from birds of Antipodes Is., to Bounty Is.,
and to Pyramid Rock in the Chatham Group.
Marion I. and southern New Zealand turtur are
different intermediates between the stout-billed
forms and slender-billed Australian and northern
New Zealand iurtur.
The distributions of tur/ur and crassirostris cannot
be correlated with the surface water zones of the
Southern Ocean as was believed by Fleming (1941),
for both breed in the Subantarctic Zone (Fig. 1).
Throughout their respective ranges, furtur and
crassirostris are connected by populations with
intermediate characteristics, suggesting that both are
heavily affected by gene-flow. This intergradation is
probably indicative of adaptations to local environ-
ments rather than of hybridization. However, the
Mangere Is. and Pyramid Rock populations (both in
the Chatham Group) probably each stem from
different parental stock; the former closely resem-
bies New Zealand turtur and the latter Bounty Is.
crassirostris. These taxa are nevertheless allopatric,
and their characteristics, being mainly differences in
size, are not greatly divergent from their hypotheti-
cal common ancestor (see Fig. 7).
The Intergradation of Different Whale-Birds
To some extent the differing bill characters of
whale-birds can be related to latitudinal distribution.
Small-billed desolara breeds in the Antarctic and
Subantarctic Zones; intermediate salvini breeds on
islands in the Subantarctic; and large-billed vittata
breeds on islands close to the Subiropical Converg-
ence. This distribution indicates that the three forms
replace each other geographically, but belcheri,
which has the smallest bill of the whale-birds, does
not fit this pattern, and is known to breed only in the
western Subantarctic Zone. Therefore these prions
do not differ in characteristics entirely according to
their latitudinal distribution or to the surface water
zones.
In Figure 19 the three desolata population groups
of the Antarctic Zone (Scotia Sea, Heard |. and
Cape Denison) are diagrammatically illustrated on
the same plane, and eastern Subantarctic desolatu
(Macquarie I, and Auckland Is.) are connected by a
vertical line in the east to indicate their geographic
position. Arrows point from Scotia Sea and Cape
Denison populations to Heard I. desolata and then
to Subantarctic Indian Ocean salvini, Subtropical
Indian Ocean vitiata (macgillivrayi) and vittata of
the southern Atlantic and New Zealand regions to
indicate their progressively preater bill sizes.
Falkland [s. belcheri are shown isolated NW of
Scotia Sea desolata and connected by an arrow to the
Subantarctic Indian Ocean islands where intermedi-
ates between belcherj and other whale-birds breed.
Figure 19 indicates that two taxa (desolata and
NORTH
O-—_w—_—
©—-@-—
ATLANTIC
INDIAN
NZ
Fig. 19—Geographical variation in bill size of whale-hirds.
Arrows point to larger-billed forms. D=desolala, S=salvini.
V=viltai Arrow from B=belcheri points to H=hybrid
belcheri x desolata—salvini. Intergradation of bill size occurs
in thé southern Indian Ocean region.
116 REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18(4): 91-121
vittata) are allopatric in the southern Atlantic and
New Zealand regions, but are connected by
intermediate forms (salvini) in the southern Indian
Ocean region.
The intergrading characteristics of desolata and
vittata can also be demonstrated by their bill
dimensions. In the southern Atlantic and New
Zealand regions, where there are no intermediate
salvini populations, the differences in their mean bill
widths are 7-1 and 7-3 respectively. But in the
southern Indian Ocean region where intermediate
salvini populations also breed, the difference
between desolata (excluding fles Kerguelen and fle
de I‘Est forms which hybridize with belcheri—see
below) and vittata in mean bill width is only 3-3.
Heard I. desolata have a slightly larger bill than
other desolata (Fig. 13) and fle Saint-Paul vittata
have a smaller bill than other vittata (Fig. 16). The
salvini populations, having varying mean bill sizes,
are probably of hybrid origin but have not
themselves become a new specific entity because in
their range of variability (bill width from 14-0 to
20-5) they include the characteristics of both
parental phenotypes. Gene-flow through the appa-
rent hybrid swarms to the parental populations
indicates that desolata and vittata are conspecific.
Hybridization of Thin-billed and Broad-billed Whale-
Birds
Differences between belcheri and members of the
desolata-salvini-vittata complex indicate that paren-
tal populations of both were isolated for a prolonged
period and that the intermediate forms of the
southern Indian Ocean region result from hybridiza-
tion.
At fles Kerguelen belcheri is much less numerous
than desolata (Falla 1937) and although specimens
have been taken at different localities in the
archipelago, Derenne et al. (1974) mapped only one
belcheri colony as compared to thirteen desolata
colonies. The characteristics of birds from only three
colonies are known, but of these one consists of
birds which closely resemble belcheri parental
phenotypes; another apparent desolata parental
phenotypes; and a third consists of birds with
intermediate characteristics (fig. 13). Also, speci-
mens taken elsewhere in the archipelago show that
the characteristics of both forms intergrade (fig. 12:
BS5-B13). It is therefore highly probable that many
Tles Kerguelen prions are hybrid belcheri x desolata.
Nevertheless, because prions usually return to their
natal colonies for breeding (Fleming 1941) each
colony may consist of very similar birds that differ
slightly from birds of other colonies. The fles
Kerguelen prion assemblage probably therefore
consists of locally different parental and hybrid
populations.
May, 1980
Despin et al. (1972) said that on fle de Il’Est salvini
are abundant and breed over most of the island
wherever suitable nesting sites are available. They
also reported a very small isolated colony containing
both belcheri and desolata, but the characteristics of
these birds appear analogous to the intergrading
characters of belcheri and desolata of fles Kerguelen.
However, the similarity in tarsus and wing lengths of
these fle de l’Est belcheri and desolata indicates they
are more closely related to each other than to any
other populations of either form. The data suggest
they were only separated by bill size, and this
distinction appears quite artificial, The alleged
desolata appear to be hybrid belcheri x desolata, but
they may well be hybrid belcheri x salvini because in
bill, tarsus and wing dimensions they are intermedi-
ate between belcheri and salvini of the same island.
A hypothetical hybrid belcheri x salvini would
probably closely resemble true desolata. The
apparent isolation of these probable hybrids and
belcheri in one small colony suggests they are
unlikely to extensively and freely interbreed with
salvini from outside the colony.
Cawkell and Hamilton (1961) said belcheri is very
numerous in the Falkland Is. and is greatly
increasing its numbers and colonizing new islands.
This increase suggests that elsewhere belcheri may
have encroached upon the breeding range of other
whale-birds.
(d) DIFFERENCES IN BREEDING TIMES
Prions of each island population have probably
developed a rather stable breeding cycle adapted to
the local environment. Fleming (1941) reasoned that
differences in breeding dates of the species he
recognised were effective isolating mechanisms.
However, similar forms breed at different times that
correspond to latitude and climate. Birds breeding
further south in a cooler climate usually have later
egg-laying dates than those breeding in northern
warmer latitudes. These facts (detailed below), and
that belcheri and desolata hybridize although their
parental populations usually breed at different
times, suggest that differences in breeding cycles
have not yet become effective isolating mechanisms.
Fairy Prions
Fleming (1941) said that turtur usually lay eggs in
mid-October while crassirostris, which he recognised
as of a cooler zone, lay in mid-November. But all
turtur populations do not breed synchronously.
Buddle (1941) said birds of the northern Poor
Knights Is. lay eggs about 15 October, Crockett
(1954) suggested the more southerly Montunau I,
birds breed slightly later, and Richdale (1965) said
the peak egg-laying date of a southern New Zealand
BREEDING DISTRIBUTION AND TAXONOMY OF THE FPRIONS 117
population is about 16 November, Subantarctic
Marion J. turiur also probably lay eggs in mid-
November, for van Zinderen Bakker (1971) said
that; “ar the end of February 1966 two nests were
found both containing nearly fully fledged chicks
which were ready (o depart to sea,”’ The incubation
period of this species is about 56 days and the
fledging petiod 44-55 days (Serventy et al. 1971),
Snares Is. turtur also probably lay in mid-November.
judging from dates on which chicks were found (see
above— Breeding Diswibution), and two chicks
found on eastern Sister islet in the more northerly
Chatham Group, listed by Dawsan (1955) as the
“Chatham fulmar prion’, must have come from eggs
laid in October; the normal laying time of northern
turtur. Therefore the breeding times of many /urtur
and crassirostris are similar.
Whale-Birds
The whale-birds also difter in breeding times
according to latitude and climate. On Tristan da
Cunha vitiaia usually completes egg-laying by the
end of August (Eliott. 1957). whereas further south
on Gough |, eggs are laid in nid-September (Swales
1965). The peak egg-laying date of southern New
Zealand vitlata is about 6 September (Richdale
1944). Subantaretic salvini lay about mid-November
(Rand 1954+) and antarctic desolata lay eggs
throughaut December (Tickell 1962). Like sulvini
sub-antaretie belcheri also lay their eges mainly in
mid-November (Falla 1937). Some of these prions
have flexible breeding times which indicate that
different forms may meet when jna similar breeding
condition, On Gough 1. a fresh vittara egg was found
in mid-November (Swales [965) antl Falla (1937)
found a desalata on Tes Kerguelen (parental
phenotype, form A) in a burrow with a fresh egg on
19 November. Tickell (1962) said of antarctic
desolata that “eggs are laid throughout December,
the earliest record being 5 December” and that some
eggs are laid as late as January if snow blocks nesting
holes.
There is little consistency in the breeding tintes of
hybridizing populutions, At Tles Kerguelen heleleri
lay exes in November and most desolara lay in
December (though an egg is known from mid-
November), but form B oof probable mixed
parentage have ua Garber eyele than other desolate
(Falla 1937), Despin et al, (1972) said that on fle de
(Est beichert and salbini breed at the sume time. but
that desolara breeds later. However, they presumed
heleher? hasan incubation period 1) days longer than
these alleged deselata when calculating laying dates
fram We belche chieks and an unspecified mumber
of alleged desolata eggs, While incubation periods
do vary. [here is no reason bo suppose the periods of
these birds chffer, Tp is also odd thar they listed the
dimensions of fle de l'Est belcheri eggs, but did not
mention finding any, whereas they did not give
dimensions of the alleged desolata eggs, Accepting
that they assigned the eggs to the right (doubtfully
separable) adults and that their judgments of lapsed
egg incubation times were correct, the data of
Despin ev al. indicate in fact that two belcheri chicks
came from eggs laid 15 days apart, and that the
alleged desolata eggs were laid 23 days later, While
the laying dates of the last eggs are not known, it is
reasonable to presume that some eggs were laid
earlicr than others. Therefore in this small colony
there is wide variation in laying dates, a situalion
very similar to the different breeding times of Mes
Kerguelen birds. Because different breeding times
do not separate forms on fles Kerguelen it is
doubtful that they act as isolating mechanisms on fle
de Est. [t must also be considered that the alleged
desolata are probably hybrid and their different
laying times may be the result of some selective
factor that enables the parental forms to retain their
awn identity.
(e) FEEDING HABITS
The feeding habs of Australian ¢irar are
probably similar to those of belchert, but both differ
in feeding behaviour from other whale-birds,
Robinsan (1961) observed mtur diving from che
surface of Port Phillip Bay. Victoria, to feed on
small whitish crustacea. On surtacing they ran acrass
the sea with wings held horizontally before alighting
at another spot preparatory to diving again, | have
seen surtur feeding in a similar manner, but off the
South Australian coast have also seen them leeding
in large flocks, picking from the surface while in
flight. pattering with their feet and fluttering
erratically over the sea. Serventy eral (1971) listed
the food of utr as “Crustacea” and thal of
crassirosiris as “Pretopeds and orher molluses.
amphipods, small fish’. but Watson (1975) also
listed “Small crustaceans” in the diet of crassirosiris
and “Small squid’ in the diet of natar
Harper (1972) said heleheri largely feed on the
amphipod Pararhemisto gaudichaudil and less atten
on small cephalopods, and observed them at night
“dashing helter-skelter over [he water feeding
voraciously on surface plankton like storm petrels
-oceasionally patting the water with the feet to
obtain extra momentum’. On the other hand he
found that desalata feed mainly in the day in @
manner described by Murphy (1936), who said “the
birds worked along with an odd creeping matin,
resting their bodies lightly upon the surface but
holding the wings just above it. the feet furtshing all
of the motive pawer.” The major food of dewlant,
salrin? and Litrdta are €rustaceans, particularly the
Krill EBupluiisia superba of southern waters.
118 REC. S. AUST, MUS. 18(4): 91-121
although cephalopods, pteropods and small fish are
also taken (Murphy 1936; Serventy ef al. 1971;
Harper 1972; Watson 1975),
IV. DISCUSSION
There is agreement that vittata evolved from thin-
billed ancestors (Murphy 1936; Falla 1940; Fleming
1941), but Fleming (1941) also hypothesized that
crassirostris has retained many features of the
ancestor of all prions. This latter hypothesis means
that thin-billed forms evolved from ancestors
resembling modern crassirostris, which is antithetic
because the phyletic lineage of thin-billed forms
would probably have included transitional forms
resembling modern turtur, yet Fleming believed that
turtur and crassirostris only recently diverged from a
single common ancestor. However, there is evidence
indicating that the common ancestor of prions had
an elongated bill with a large but narrow dertrum,
like the bills of Australian and northern New
Zealand turtur. This evidence is gained by comparing
prions with close relatives,
Monotypic Halobaena is very closely-related to
Pachyptila. It is also close to Pterodroma but differs
in having a prion-like palate (Alexander et al. 1965),
Contrary to Alexander et al. (1965), Harper (1978)
said, when summarizing results of plasma protein
studies, that it is “probable” that ‘“‘Pachyptila and
Halobaena are only very distantly related; the prions
evolved from a small fulmarine ancestor, whereas
the Pterodroma group gave rise to the blue petrel.””
Nevertheless, Harper did not have plasma samples
of Halobaena and he aligned it with Pterodroma and
not Pachyptila because the former two show “little
tumescent development of the latericorns” (p,529).
However, it is generally agreed that primitive prions
had narrow bills and that broad-billed forms evolved
later (Murphy 1936, Falla 1940, Fleming 1941), and
some modern prions lack broad latericorns. Harper
also compared the long nasal tubes of fulmarines to
the short tubes of Pterodroma, but in respect of these
Pachyptila and Halobaena have consistently short
tubes. Although Halobaena has similar plumage
characters (except crown and forehead) to those of
prions and these may have resulted from converg-
ence (Harper loc. cit.), it also differs from
Pterodroma in lacking an entirely black bill (Cox
1976). The question of the relationships of these
genera must remain open because little evidence
supports the hypothesis that Pachyptila is more
closely-related to fulmarines than to Halobaena, or
the hypothesis that Halobaena is more closely-
related to Pterodroma than to Pachyptila. Therefore
there is little reason as yet to dispute the opinions of
Alexander et al. (1965) that Halobaena is closely-
related to Pachyptila and Pterodroma. The bill of the
May, 1980
Blue Petrel Halobaena caerulea greatly resembles
that of belcheri although viewed in profile its
dertrum is larger and more strongly hooked,
resembling some slender-billed turtur. Viewed
dorsally the dertra of Halobaena and _ small
Pterodroma, particularly of the subgenus Cookilaria,
are narrow and similar to those of turtur and belcheri
but unlike that of crassirostris. Slender-billed turtur
and belcheri are the only forms of each prion group
with similar bills, and the only prions which
resemble in bill characteristics birds of closely-
related genera.
Salient aspects of modern prion distributions also
indicate that turtur is an ancient form. In the
Australian and New Zealand region its populations
are large and abundant, but in the southern Atlantic
and Indian Ocean regions, where whale-birds are
numerous, it is only known from a few isolated
colonies. Together with the fact that turtur has bill
characteristics like those of belcheri only in the
Australian and northern New Zealand region
(Marion I, rurtur have thin, but short bills) where the
breeding ranges of the two prion groups do not
overlap, these aspects suggest ancestral turtur were
widespread but that only remnant populations
survived competition with ancestral whale-birds in
the western parts of their range. In areas of
overlapping range turtur has a stouter bill, indicating
that both prion groups were able to co-exist only
after ecological adaptations evolved,
It is evident that populations of the common
ancestor of whale-birds became isolated. Some, the
progenitors of belcheri, did not diverge in morphol-
ogy to any great extent, but others appear to have
utilised the teeming crustacea of the Southern Ocean
as their major food source and through selection
developed a different bill structure. These birds,
having adapted to a food supply largely unexploited
by other prions, successfully spread and, eventually,
their populations became isolated. The northern
birds developed larger bills (conforming to Allen's
Rule that warm-blooded animals have greater
surface areas in warm regions, and have a reduced
surface area—volume ratio in cooler regions as an
adaptation to prevent heat loss—Mayr 1963) and in
two regions where they are not connected by zonally
intermediate populations to southern smaller-billed
forms they appear quite distinct. However, their
different bill sizes may be purely adaptive
characteristics which are not necessarily indicative of
fundamental changes in genetic composition,
because where intermediate forms occur the
differences in nearby parental forms are less
pronounced. The early isolate from common
ancestral whale-bird stock, belcheri, presumably
increased in numbers and range and, where it
colonised islands already occupied by wide-billed
whale-birds, interbreeding occurred.
BREEDING DISTRIBUTION AND TAXONOMY OF THE PRIONS 119
Classification
Fundamental to a valid classification is am
understanding of the relationships of the different
prions, and recognition of their dynamic evoluno-
nary trends, Previous classifications of prions have,
to say the least, artificially categorised populations
by doubttul morphological characteristics. The
synonymy is vast and confusing. Condon (1975)
listed 58 names, of which 34 were bestawed by G.
M. Mathews, Hellmayr and Conover (1948) said
Mathews had “within a years time, based Iwo
different names on the very same specimen in the
British Museum”. A major cause of this confusion ts
the inter- and intra-specific variation in prion bills.
Beach-washed specimens far from their unknown
natal home were sometimes named as distinct forms
because of bill differences (Mathews 1912), but
substantial collections in the Australian Muselm
and the South Australian Museum show complete
intergradation in the characteristics previously used
to distinguish species. Intermediates are numerous.
Smaller samples from many breeding localities
demonstrate similar inconsistencies.
The characteristics of tirtir and crassirostris
intergrade over a wide area, indicating canspecific-
ity, Many island populations appear to have slightly
diverged in different directions and a dimensional
unalysis of specimens is required to clarify
geographic variation. Both forms have been subject
to recent pene-flow but their respective ranges
appear ta be clearly demarcated in the Chatham
Group although delimitations elsewhere are unclear,
As iin interim measure to indicate the relaionships
of populations, Heard I. and Auckland Is. birds are
here classified as u phenotypie tarm that ts
intermediate between crassirosinis of Pyramid Rock
and the Bounty Ts, (including the twa specimens
alleged to he from Antipodes Is.), and winur of the
Falkland Is.. Marion |., Australia and New Zealand.
Differences in morphology and feeding habits
indicate that belchen’ is evolving on a different
evolutionary line from other whale-birds. Parental
populations of both are thriving and in their zone of
overlap and hybridisation it ts probable, at one
locality, that hybrids are disadvantaged.
The other whale-birds consist of two taxa
connected by intermediate populations in a wide
area that contains few, if any, parental phenotypes.
Because this zone of intergradation is between two
regions where both taxa are clearly demarcated in
allopatric breeding distributions, it is probable that
intergradation occurred through hybridization. By
virtue of the island distribution of these probable
hybrid populations, and to illustrate clearly their
relationships, they are here tentatively classified as a
phenotypic form. Other than desolata, salvini and
vittatg, Subspecific recognition of other slightly
different papulatians within the species is arbitrary,
Tickell’s (1962) recognition of banksi and alter =
macquariensis is not followed here because the
characteristics of cach vary over a wide area,
indicative of slight geographic variation, and few
individuals would be identifiable. In view of the
occurrence on files Kerguelen of both desolata and
desolata x belcheri, the identity of the lost holotype
of desolaia may be questioned. In the absence of
evidence to the contrary, [ here consider the type of
desolata to have come from the ‘desolara phenotype
colonies rather than from one of the hybrid colonies.
If the type of desolata (Gmelin, 1789) is found ta be
hybrid, banksi Smith, 1840 should be resurrected as
the name for this southern subspecies of P. vittara-
The following tentative classification is proffered
until sufficient evidence suggesting otherwise is
forthcoming. In the hope of preventing: possible
future misinterpretations of “possible” or “‘prob-
able’ breeding grounds. only proven breeding
loculities of each taxon are listed. In both subspecies
and species the taxa of presumed oldest lineage are
listed first. Condon (1975) listed synonyms of the
scientific nomenclature used. and the English names
proposed by the Royal Australasian Ornithologists
Union (1978) are followed; one is of common usage
and two are descriptive.
Genus Pachyptila [Ihger. 1511,
Pachiyplila turtur (Xuhl, 1820) FAIRY PRION
Pachyprtila turtue turtur (Xuhl, 1820)
Breeds: Beauchene |, Falkland Group: Manan
L.; islands in Bass Strait and off Tasmania,
islands off New Zealand irom the Snares Is.
North to the Poor Knights 1s.; Big and Little
Mangere Is., Chatham Group.
Pachyptila turtur eatoni (Mathews, 1912)
Breeds: Heard I. and the Auckland Is,
Pachyptila turtur crassirasiris (Mathews, 1912)
Breeds: Bounty [y., and Pyramid Rock of the
Chatham Group.
Pachyptila belcheri (Mathews, 1912) SLENDER-
BILLED PRION
Breeds: Falkland fs., Tle de VEst of Archipel
Crozet, and fles Kerguelen.
N.B. Interbreeds with the following species where
both occupy the same islands.
Pachyptila vitrata (Forster, 1777) BROAD-BILLED
PRION
Pachyptila vittata desolata (Gmelin, 1789)
Breeds: S. Shetland Is., S. Orkney Is., &,
Sandwich Is., S. Georgia, fles Kerguelen,
Heard J,, Macquarie I,, Auckland Is., Scott [-
and Cape Denison of Antarctica,
120
Pachyptila vittata salvini (Mathews, 1912)
Breeds: Marion and Prince Edward Is., and
Archipel Crozet.
Pachyptila vittata vittata (Forster, 1777)
Breeds: Tristan da Cunha, Gough I., fle Saint-
Paul, fle Amsterdam, Snares Is., Chatham Is.
and the mainland coasts of Foveaux Strait and
south-western fiords of South I., New Zealand
and islets off Stewart I.
V ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am indebted to the Director and staff of the
South Australian Museum for providing the facilities
necessary to undertake this work, particularly to Mr.
S. A, Parker (Curator of Birds) who gave much time
to discussion and constructive criticism. For
providing facilities in the Australian Museum I
thank Mr. H. J. De S. Disney and Mr. W. Boles. I
also thank the Directors and staff of other museums
for the loan of specimens, Dr. F. C. Kinsky, Mr. A.
R. McEvey and Mr. J. L. McKean for assistance in
locating material, Dr. D. H. Close for translating
references, Mr. L. Joseph for analysing dimensions,
and Mr. R. Ruehle for taking the photographs.
Special thanks are due to Mr. R. F. Brown, Dr. G.
W. Johnstone, Mr. W. B. Hitchcock and Mr. S. A.
Parker for their valuable comments and criticisms of
the manuscript.
VI REFERENCES
ALEXANDER, W. B., FALLA, R. A., JOUANIN, C.,
MURPHY, R. C., SALOMONSEN, F., BOURNE, W. R.
P., VOOUS, K. H., WATSON, G. W., FLEMING, C. A.,
KURODA, N. H., ROWAN, M. K., SERVENTY, D. L.,
TICKELL, W. L. N.,. WARHAM, J., and WINTERBOT-
TOM, J. M. 1965, The families and genera of petrels and
their names. Ibis 107: 401-405.
BUDDLE, G. A. 1941. Birds of the Poor Knights. Emu 41: 56-
68.
CAWKELL, E. M. and HAMILTON, J. E. 1961. The Birds of
the Falkland Islands. Ibis 103a: 1-27.
CLANCY, P. A. 1965. A catalogue of birds of the South African
subregion. Pt. 1, Durban Mus, Novit. 7: 201-304,
CONDON, H. T. 1975. “Checklist of the Birds of Australia, 1.
Non-passerines’’. Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union,
Melbourne,
COX, J. B. 1976. A review of the Procellariiformes occurring in
South Australian waters. S. Aust, Ornith. 27: 25-82.
CROCKETT, D. E. 1954. Notes on the birds of Motunau Island.
Notornis 6: 49-50.
DAWSON, E. W, 1955. The birds of the Chatham Islands 1954
Expedition. Notornis 6: 78-82.
DERENNE, P., LUFBERY, J. X. and TOLLU, B. 1974.
L’avifaune de l’Archipel Kerguelen. Com. Nat. Fr. Rech.
Antarctiques 33: 57-87.
DESPIN, B., MOUGIN, J. L., and SEGONZAC, M. 1972.
Oiseaux et mammiféres de l’ile de L’Est. Com. Nat. Fr.
Rech, Antarctiques 31: 1-106.
DISNEY. H. J. de S., DANDRIA, A., FULLAGAR, P. J.,
JOHNSTONE, G. W., HITCHCOCK, W. B., MERILEES,
W. J. and McEVEY, A, R. 1974. “Bird in the Hand”, (S. G.
Lane, ed.). Bird Banders Association of Australia, Sydney.
DOWNES, M. C., EALEY, E. H.M., and YOUNG, P. S, 1959.
The birds of Heard Island. A.N.A.R.E. Rep., Ser. B, 1: 1-
135,
REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18(4): 91-121
May, 1980
EDGAR, A. T. 1977. Classified summarised notes. Notornis 24:
246-279.
ELLIOTT, H. F. I. 1957. A contribution to the ornithology of the
Tristan de Cunha Group. Ibis 99: 545-586.
FALLA, R. A. 1937. Birds. Brit, Aust. N.Z. Antarctic Res.
Exped. 1929-1931 Rep., Ser. B, 2: 1-304.
FALLA, R. A. 1940. The genus Pachyptila Illiger. Emu 40: 218-
236.
FALLA, R. A., SIBSON, R. B. and TURBOTT, E. G. 1966. ‘A
Field Guide to the Birds of New Zealand and outlying
islands”. Collins, London.
FLEMING, C. A. 1939. Birds of the Chatham Islands, 1. Emu
38; 380-412.
FLEMING, C. A. 1941. The phylogeny of the prions. Emu 41:
134-155.
FLEMING, C. A. 1948. The Snares Island Expedition 1947, N.Z,
Bird Notes 2; 181-184.
FLEMING, C. A. and BAKER, A.N. 1973, The Snares Western
Chain. Notornis 20: 37-45.
FULLAGAR, P. J. 1972. Identification of prions—Pachyptila
spp. Aust. Bird Bander 10: 36-39.
HARPER, P. C. 1972. The field identification and distribution of
the Thin-billed Prion (Pachyptila belcheri) and the Antarctic
Prion (Pachyptila desolata). Notornis 19: 56-60.
HARPER, P. C. 1978. The plasma proteins of some albatrosses
and petrels as an index of relationship in the Procellarii-
formes N.Z. Jl. Zool. 5: 509-541.
HARPER, P. C. and KINSKY, F, C. 1974. New Zealand
albatrosses and petrels. Tuatara 21: 1-80.
HARPER, P. C. and KINSKY, F. C. 1978 “Southern
Albatrosses and Petrels”, Price Milburn, Wellington.
HELLMAYR, C. E. and CONOVER, B. 1948. Catalogue of the
birds of the Americas, Field Mus. Nat. Hist. Zool. Ser, 13, 1:
55-58.
HOLDGATE, M. W., TILBROOK, P. J. and VAUGHAN, R.
W. 1968. Biology of Bouvetgya. Brit. Antarctic Surv. Bull.
15: 1-7.
HOLGERSEN, H. 1960. Fugl i norske biland. 2. Bouvet-ya.
Sterna 4: 1-9.
HORNING Jr., D. S. and HORNING, C. J. 1974. Bird records
of the 1971-1973 Snares Islands, New Zealand, Expedition.
Notornis 21: 13-24,
KEITH, K. and HINES, M. P. 1958. New and rare species of
birds at Macquarie Island during 1956 and 1957. C.S.I.R.O.
Wildlife Res. 3: 50-53.
KINSKY, F. C. and HARPER, P. C, 1968. Shrinkage of bill
width in skins of some Pachyptila species. Ibis 110; 100-102.
LEARMONTH, N. F. 1957. A Victorian record of Pachyptila
crassirostris.. Emu 57: 57-59.
MACDONALD, J. D. 1973. “Birds of Australia”. Reed,
Sydney.
MATHEWS, G. M. 1912. *‘The Birds of Australia, 2.”” Witherby,
London,
MATHEWS, G. M. 1932. New subspecies of prions. Bull. Br.
Orn. Club 52; 146-147.
MATHEWS, G. M. 1937. Remarks on prions. Emu 37: 118-121,
MATHEWS, G. M. 1938. Pachyptila, or the Prions. Emu 37: 280-
284.
MAYR, E. 1963, ‘Populations, Species, and Evolution’.
Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.),
McEVEY, A. 1957, Measurements of Victorian prions. Emu 57:
199-200.
McKEAN, J. L. and LEWIS, J. H. 1971. Record of Fulmar Prion
off southern New South Wales. Emu 71: 141.
MURPHY, R. C, 1936. ‘Oceanic Birds of South America, 1”.
American Museum of Natural History, New York.
OLIVER, W. R. B. 1955. ‘New Zealand Birds”. 2nd ed. Reed,
Wellington.
RAND, R, W. 1954, Notes on the birds of Marion Island. Ibis
96: 173-206.
RICHDALE, L. E. 1944. The Titi Wainui or Fairy Prion
Pachyptila turtur (Kuhl), Trans. Roy. Soc. N.Z. 74: 32-48,
165-181.
BREEDING DISTRIBUTION AND TAXONOMY OF THE PRIONS 121
RICHDALE, L. E. 1965, Breeding behaviour of the Narrow-
billed Prion and the Broad-billed Prion on Whero Island,
New Zealand. Trans. Zool. Soc. London 31; 87-155.
ROBERTS, B. B, 1964. Antarctic. In ‘‘A New Dictionary of
Birds’ (Thompson, A. L. ed.), pp. 51-55. British
Ornithologists’ Union, London.
ROBINSON, L. N. 1961. The feeding of Fairy Prions. Aust. Bird
Watcher 1: 156-157.
ROBINSON, R. D. 1974. Status of the Fulmar Prion in
Australia. S$. Aust. Ornith. 26: 168.
ROYAL AUSTRALASIAN ORNITHOLOGISTS UNION.
1978. Recommended English names for Australian Birds.
Emu 77: 245-307.
SAGAR, P. M. 1977a. Birds of the Western Chain Snares
Islands, New Zealand. Notornis 24: 178-183.
SAGAR, P. M. 1977b. Birds of the 1976-77 Snares Islands
Expedition. Notornis 24: 205-210.
SERVENTY, D. L., SERVENTY, V. and WARHAM, J. 1971.
“The Handbook of Australian Sea-birds.”” Reed, Sydney.
SLATER, P. 1970. “A Field Guide to Australian Birds, 1°°.
Rigby, Adelaide.
SOLYANIK, G. A. 1964. Some birds observations on Bouvet
Island. Sov. Antarctic Exped. Inform. Bull. 2: 97-100.
STRANGE, I. J. 1968. A breeding colony of Pachyptila turtur in
the Falkland Islands. Ibis 110: 358-359.
SWALES, M. K. 1965. The sea-birds of Gough Island. Ibis 107:
17-42.
TICKELL, W. L. N. 1962. The Dove Prion Pachyptila desolata
Gmelin. Falkland Isl. Depend. Surv. Sci. Rep. 33: 1-55.
VAN ZINDEREN BAKKER Jr., E. M. 1971. Comparative
Avian Ecology. In ‘‘Marion and Prince Edward Islands
Report on the South African Biological and Geological
Expedition 1965-66”. (A. A. Balkema, ed.), pp 161-172. A.
A. Balkema, Capetown.
WAITE, E. R. 1909. Aves, in Subantarctic Islands of New
Zealand. Article 25: 551-584, Mackay, Wellington,
WARHAM, J. 1967. Snares Island birds. Notornis 14: 122-139.
WATSON, G.E. 1975. Birds of the Antarctic and Sub-Antarctic.
Antarctic Res. Ser. American Geophysical Union,
Washington.
WOOD-JONES, F. 1937. The Breeding of prions on islands off
the coast of Victoria. Emu 36: 186-188.
EVOLUTIONARY SYSTEMATICS OF XENYLLA.
XI. SPECIES FROM THE AUSTRALIAN REGION
(INSECTA: COLLEMBOLA)
BY MARIA MANUELA DA GAMA
Summary
In some material from all states of Australia the author found twelve Xenylla species, one of which
— X. victoriana, is new. In addition the chaetotaxy of X. littoralis from Australia and Japan was
studied. The systematics and evolution of some of these taxa are considered.
EVOLUTIONARY SYSTEMATICS OF XENYLLA. XI, SPECIES FROM THE AUSTRALIAN REGION
(INSECTA: COLLEMBOLA)
MARIA MANUELA DA GAMA
Zoological Museum of The University of Coimbra, Portugal.
ABSTRACT
GAMA, M.M.da, 1979, Evolutionary systematics of Xenylla. XI,
Species from the Australian region (Insecta: Collembola). Rec. S.
Aust. Mus, 14(5); 123-129.
In some material from all states of Australia the
author found twelve
which—X. victoriana, is new. In addition the
chaetotaxy of X, litroralis from Australia and Japan
was studied. The systemati¢s and evolution of some
of these taxa are considered.
INTRODUCTION
Following my studies on some Xenylla species
from Australia, principally from South Australia
(Gama 1974), Mrs. Penelope Greenslade of the
South Australian Museum, Adelaide, kindly sepa-
rated out for me the Nenylla species from 62 samples
which she had assembled from all States of
Australia, the Torres Strait Is., Tasmania and New
Caledonia. Most of the material had been collected
by Mrs. Greenslade herself.
The material contained 12 species, of which one ts
new, but the most interesting find is, in my opinion,
that of X, littoralis, which also lives in the littoral
zone in Japan.
Mrs, P. Greenslade also sent me the H,
Womersley collection of examples of this genus
which has been very useful for my study, especially
when considering X. liftoralis,
The material is deposited in the Institutions cited
below, whose names have been abbreviated in the
text as follaws:—
SAM— South Australian Museum, Adelaide
ANIC— National Insect Collection, c/o C.S.1.R0.,
Division of Entomology, Canberra
MG— Muséum d'Histoire naturelle de Geneve
Mo Museu Zooldgico da Universidade de
Coimbra
SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION
SPECIES
OF THE
1, Xenylla welchi Folsom, 1916
Xenylla welchi Folsom, 1916, p. 497.
Material ¢xamined—Launceston, Tasmama, in
horse manure, garden, very numerous specimens,
9.v.1977. Some specimens in alcohol (SAM); some
specimens, in alcohol (ANIC) and some specimens,
in ulcohol (MC),
Xenylla species, one of
2. Xenylla littoralis Womersley, 1934
Xenylla littoralis Womersley, 1934, p. 56.
Description—Body length, 1.2-2.1 mm, Blue.
Cutaneous granules coarse and third pleurite
possessing a lateral conical projection.
Chaetotaxy consisting of supernumerary setac,
sometimes very numerous, principally in those
specimens with a long body, and often very
irregular. Therefore I found it very difficult to
determine the chaetotaxie formula of this species.
On the drawing of dorsal chaetotaxy (fig. 1), the
dotted line setae represent the most frequent
supernumerary setae, but most specimens have
many more. Moreover in this species one can
distinguish a differentiation into macrochaetae and
microchaetae, which is unusual in the genus Xenylla.
Dorsal chaetotaxy (fig. 1):
Head: all
(character [),
Th.1-I[l; all setae present and central setae
arranged in three rows; there are 2 §.s. on each side,
one of which in position P,.
Abd. I-UL; S.s.=P,; ps present.
Abd. IV: §.5.=Ps; py absent (character n). I am
not sure whether aj is, or is not, present.
Abd. V: all setae present.
Ventral chaetotaxy:
Head: I think that one may consider that all setae
are present, although p, or m,; are absent on some
specimens (fig. 1 in Gama 1969: 4).
Th.U-Uk: without setae (character t).
Abd. [[: p, and p, absent (character vy) and p, also
(character w),
setae present; L, longer than L,
Abd. IIT: without medial setae nor median seta.
Abd. [YV: all setae present,
Antenna IV with four sensillae, of Which the twa
most external of the three dorso-external are very
long, the ratio between the length of the other two
sensillae and the length of these ones being more or
less 3:4,
5+5 eyes.
Unguis with inner tooth, Tibiotarsus with two
dorsal tenent hairs, Tenaculum with 2+2 barbs,
Mucro very long, distinctly separated from dens,
which has two setac, tapering to a fine point and
124 REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18(5): 123-129 May, 1980
x
co
c
c
é
£
« Ss 5
c%
& »
{Lo~
u
.
Se
te /
we we
rn enone veeeeweeh uy
P \ »
€ ?
x 3
>?
Meee re BE ee ree
BAAR AAA RA AAR AR AANA RANA man
AAR
Nan
ara
a
eevee
wey
vee n
nanananannnananananan
naancse aeetetes
a
aaa nX vey
~
eer Pnneee
c
ms
c
c
¢
c
¢
e
c
¢
€ ™
C
¢
C
C
¢
c
c
‘S
c
u
LS
x
Se
Bs SE EE
NII ID PIRI I
ra 2
¢ 2
¢ a
ni >
( ‘ F >
f + ae a = \ 3
¢ ? \ 3 2
C ; 3
c Ks wa . ?
is
)
a
% !
\ ?
v
u Pp P. ff
& 2 BaP a
be
“eereece yw
9 le eee bee ee ee ee “3
“ Pp
J}
& a, gf
&
w
&,
me Veen \ Tin Sat
cg
¢
Fig. 1—Xenylla littoralis. Dorsal chaetotaxy of head, th. I-II and
abd. I, IV, V, VI.
EVOLUTIONARY SYSTEMATICS OF XENYLLA 125
possessing one inner narrow lamella. Mucro more or
less equal in length to dens, a little longer or a little
shorter (fig. 41-E in Womersley 1939: 93).
Anal spines and papillae very well developed.
Systematics and evolution—When Prof. Yosii, in
1972, sent me one sample of Xenylla from Japan
(see material examined) he thought that it perhaps
belonged to X. littoralis, but added that Australia
was quite a distance from Japan!
Several times I looked again at this halophilous
species, without arriving at any conclusion.
When only some months ago, I had the chance to
compare this material and the material cited below
with the Womersley collection, and was able to
confirm that the Japanese species is identical with X.
littoralis from Australia, not only in the adaptative
characters but also in the chaetotaxic characters (fig.
1).
The examination of three paratypes of X. arenosa
Uchida and Tamura, 1967, a Japanese species which
also lives in the seashore, reveals that it can be
separated from X. littoralis by some fundamental
nonadaptative characters, namely the character b
(cephalic setae p,p,; absent) although the central
setae on th. II-III are arranged in three rows
(absence of characters h, and hj) as in X. littoralis.
I think that the principal adaptative characters by
which the Womersley species is separated from X.
arenosa are that the former species has two tenent
hairs on its tibiotarsus while the latter has only one;
furthermore X. littoralis possesses anal spines but X.
arenosa does not; finally X. littoralis has a less
tapered mucro than X. arenosa.
Material examined—South Australia: Yorke
Peninsula, Jolly’s Beach, 21 mi. E. Sleaford Bay,
under stones between tides, 7 specimens, leg. P.
Greenslade, 3.ix.1975—1 specimen, on_ slide
(SAM); 1 specimen, on slide (ANIC); 1 specimen,
on slide (MG); 4 specimens, on slide (MC); Yorke
Peninsula, Royston Head, on beach between tides, 8
specimens, leg. P. Greenslade, 27.1.1976—2 speci-
mens, in alcohol (SAM); 2 specimens, in alcohol
(ANIC); 2 specimens, in alcohol (MG); 2
specimens, in alcohol (MC); Christies Beach, 4
specimens, 25.i.1932 (identified by Womersley).
Western Australia: Rottnest Island, 1 cotype,
31.1.1931 (identified by Womersley); Marino Rocks,
2 specimens, 25. XII. 1939 (identified by Womers-
ley). Japan: Cape Tachimachi, near Hakodate,
Hokkaido, among the debris thrown on the sea
shore, 9 specimens, leg. R. Yosii, 5.viti.1971. These
specimens are on a slide and in alcohol (MC).
3. Xenylla thibaudi thibaudi Massoud, 1965
Xenylla thibaudi Massoud, 1965, p. 374.
Observations—This is the first time that X.
thibaudi thibaudi has been found in Australia, but it
has been already found in New Guinea, the Solomon
Islands and the Bismarck Archipelago.
Material examined—Queensland: Cooloola, rain
forest litter, 7 specimens, leg. P. Greenslade,
23.ii.1977—in alcohol (MC); Idem, 3 ad. + 3 juv.,
16.i1.1977—in alcohol (ANIC); Cooloola, rain forest
pitfalls, 2 specimens, leg. P. Greenslade, i1.1977—in
alcohol (MG); Cooloola, Warrawonga pitfalls, 2
specimens, leg. P. Greenslade, 11.1977—in alcohol
(SAM); Cooloola, Warrawonga leaf litter, 8
specimens, leg. P. Greenslade, 16.i1i.1977—in
alcohol (MG); Idem, 12 specimens, 23.ii.1977—in
alcohol (ANIC); Idem, 40° specimens,
29.ii1.1977—in alcohol (MC); Cooloola, Birwillah
litter, 12 specimens, leg. P. Greenslade,
16.ii.1977—in alcohol (SAM). New Caledonia:
Metzdorf Valley, litter, 5 juv., leg. Gross,
5.1.1966.—in alcohol (MC).
4, Xenylla yucatana Mills, 1938
Xenylla yucatana Mills, 1938, p. 183.
Material examined—Torres Strait Islands: Murray
Is., litter from vine, bamboo forest, about twenty
specimens, leg. Cameron, 17.viil974—in alcohol
(MC); Murray Is., leaf litter, about fifteen
specimens, leg. Cameron, 17.vii.1974—in alcohol
(SAM).
5. Xenylla womersleyi Gama, 1974
Xenylla womersleyi Gama, 1974, p. 81.
Material examined—South Australia: Nuyts
Archipelago, Maselon Island, litter from Westringia
sp., 5 specimens in poor condition, leg. P.
Greenslade, 17.i1.1977—in alcohol (MC).
6. Xenylla australiensis australiensis Gama, 1974
Xenylla australiensis Gama, 1974, p.75.
Synonym—Xenylla mucronata Womersley, 1939
non Axelson, 1903.
Systematics—The Womersley collection includes
other specimens, mounted in slides, named as X.
mucronata, coming from the You Yang Mountains,
Wartook, and also Kenwick (see Womersley 1939:
92).
However, only the specimens cited below could be
studied in this work, because the other specimens
are not in good condition.
Material examined—Western Australia: Ragged
Mountain, 70 mi S Balladonia, near Israelite Bay,
litter under Petrophile sp, 1 specimen, leg. P.
Greenslade, 24.v.1977—in alcohol (SAM).
Victoria: Coranderrk Reserve, Healesville, about
fifteen specimens, 27.1.1976—in alcohol (ANIC);
Beaufort, Boxer Cutting, in grass, 1 specimen, leg.
126 REC, 5. AUST, MUS, 18(5): 123-129
P, Greenslade, 12,vi.1975—in alcohol (MG); You
Yang Mountains, forest Reserve, fram log, 1
specimen, leg, P, Greenslade. 9.vi.1975—in alcohol
(MC); You Yang Mountains, 2. specimens,
23,ix,1931 (identified by Womersley as X. miuc-
ronata); Fish Falls, Wartoak, 3 specimens, 30. XII.
1939 (identified by Womersley as X, mucronata).
South Australia: Innes National Park, Yorke
Peninsula. litter, 35 specumens, leg. P. Greenslade,
2.0.1974—in aleohol (SAM); Yorke Peninsula,
south central, mallee litter, 15 specimens, leg. P,
Greenslade, 2.11.1974—in alcahol (MG); 7 km NW
Morgan, Casuarina litter, 1 juv., leg. P. Greenslade,
17.xti,.1976—~in alcohol (ANIC); 7 km NW Morgan,
pitfalls, 22 specimens, leg. P. Greenslade, 15-
(7.xii,.1976—in aleohal (MC); near Loxion, mallee
leaf litter, 2 specimens, leg. P. Greenslade,
25,1x,1974—in alcohol (SAM); Nuyts Archipelago,
Maselon Island, litter under bush, 1 specimen, leg.
P, Greenslade, 171.1977—in alcohol (ANIC);
Belair, 9 specimens, Jeg P, Greenslade, 28
iv,1971—1n_~ alcohol (MG); Coorong, Coolatoo,
disturbance pitfalls, clay pan, in grass, 10 specimens.
leg. P Greenslade, 13.x.1975—in alcohol (MC):
Coorong. Coolatoo, disturbance pitfalls, clay pan, in
bushes, 6 specimens, leg. P. Greenslade, 28.ix.-
13,x.1975—in alcohol (SAM); Mt. Bold, Finniss
Raver, rotten log, about thirty juv., leg. P.
Greenslade, 4.¥.1975—in alcohol (ANIC); Glenelg
River Reserve, Evicalypius leaf litter, 12 juy.. leg. P.
Greenslade, 18,v.1975—n alcohol (MG): 12 km N
of Mt. Gambier, needles under Pinus radiata
planted 1929, 3 juy,, leg. P, Greenslade,
19,y.1975—in aleahol (SAM),
7. Xenylla greensladeae Gama, 1974
Xenylla greensladeae Gama, 1974, p. 72.
Systematics—Among the Womersley material
there are 4 specimens, on slides, labelled as X. prisca
i.sp., Which as far as I know, has never been
described.
l have been able to study two of these specimens
which were found to be X. greensladeae.
Material examined—Queensland: 15 mi E Killar-
ney, rain forest near Queen Mary Falls, leaf litter, 5
specimens, leg. P, Greenslade, 16.v,1974—in
alcohal (SAM); Emu Creek, 20 mi E Warwick, leaf
jitter, about fifty specimens, leg. P. Greenslade,
14.v.1974—in alcohol (ANIC). Western Australia:
Ashburton River, stony flood plain, 5 specimens,
leg. P. Greenslade, 22.vi.1975—in alcohol (MG),
Australian Capital Territory: Brindabella Range nor.
Picadilly Circus, Eucalyptus forest leaf letter.
iumerous specimens, leg. P, Greenslade, 26. vii-
May, 1980
i.1972—in alcohol (MC), New South Wales: Dorrigo
Run, pitfalls, 1 specimen, leg. Weir, 1.1974—in
alcohol (SAM). South Australia: Yorke Peninsula,
Innes National Park, tall mallee, 9 specimens, leg, P,
Greenslade, 14.x.1974—in alcohol (ANIC); Ferries-
McDonald Reserve, 3 specimens, leg. E. G.
Matthews, [3.x.1977—in aleohol (MG): Belair, in
moss, | specimen (identified by Womersley as X,
prisca nesp.) 26,ix,1943; 7 km NW Morgan,
Casuarina litier, 4 specimens, leg. P. Greenslade,
17.xi1.1976—in aleohol (MC); Idem, 1 juv.—in
aleohol (ANIC): Morgan, soil samples. 2 specimens,
leg. Butler, 1974—in alcohol (SAM); 7 km NW
Morgan, pitfalls, 12 specimens, Jeg. P. Greenslade,
15-17.xii. 1976—in alecohal (MC): Morgan, under
mallee, 35 specimens, leg. Hutson, x,1974—1n
alcohol (SAM); Coorong, Coolatoo, disturbance
traps, clay pan, in grass, 5 specimens, leg. P.
Greenslade, 13,x.1975—in alcohol (MC); Coorong,
Banff Transect, 35 specimens, leg, P, Greenslade.
¥.1975—an alcohal (MG), Muston, (Kangaran
Island), in moss, 1 specimen (identified by
Womersley as X. prisca i.sp.), 23.vin.1943.
Victoria: Tarra Falls Valley, in Brass, | specimen.
leg. P, Greenslade, 11_vi.1975—in alcohol (ANIC),
8, Nenylla meritima Tullberg, 1869
Xenylla maritima Tullberg, 1869, p.11.
Material examined—South Australia: 75 mi N Mt.
Gambier, Acacia/Casuarina litter, SAM 325. 16
specimens in poor condition, leg. P. Greenslade,
19.v,1975—in alcohol (SAM); Kiutpo Forest, on
dead Pinus radiata branches, 10 specimens, leg. P-
Greenslade, 20.x.1974—in alcohol (ANIC); Glen
Osmond, 3 specimens, iii.1935 (identified by
Womersley). Western Australia: Perth, 1 specimen,
23.v.1931 (identified by Womersley). Victoria
Studley Park, 1 specimen, viii,1931 (identified by
Womersley},
9. Xenylla vicfonana n.sp.
Holotype and Paratypes: Victoria—Otway
Ranges, fern forest litter, 45 paratypes, leg, P.
Greenslade, 8.vi.1975. Holotype, on slide (SAM); 5
paratypes, an slide (MG); 7 paratypes, on slide. and
32 paratypes, in alcohol (MC), Erskin River,
Eucalyptus woodland, litter and logs, 20 paratypes,
leg. P. Greenslade, 8.vi.1975, 16 paratypes, in
alcohol (SAM) and 4 paratypes, on slide (MC);
Toorangi State Forest, litter and logs, 4 paratypes,
leg. P_ Greenslade, 1f,vi,1975—in alcohol (ANIC);
Tara Valley Reserve, falls leaf litter, 3 paratypes,
leg. P. Greenslade, 11.vi.1975—in alcohol (MG);
Tarra Falls, Wall Valley, in grass, 1 paratype, leg. P
Greenslade, 11.v1.1975—on slide (ANIC).
EVOLUTIONARY SYSTEMATICS OF NENYLLA 27
Description
Body length 0-62-0-92 mm. Blue, Cutaneous
granules fine. Dorsal chaetotaxy revealing the
following characters:
Head: p, is absent (character b); L, longer than Ly
(character f).
Th.ILIL; all setae present, central setae arranged
in five rows (characters h, and h,) and with 2 8.8, on
each side, one of each in position Py,
Abd. I-Il: S.s.=P,: ps present.
Abd. IV: S.s.=Ps;; a; present.
Abd. V: S.s.=P3; a) absent (character q).
The characters of ventral chaetotaxy are as
follows:
Head: all setae present,
Th. II-III: one seta on each side.
Abd. II: two medial setae.
Abd. Ill: without medial setae nor median seta,
Abd. 1V: m, is absent (character a,); m, is absent
(character a,)—This is the first species of Nerrylla in
which I have found character as,
Antenna IV with four cylindrical similar sensillae.
5+5 eyes.
Unguis without visible inner tooth, Tibiotarsus
with two dorsal tenent hairs. Tenaculum with 3+3
barbs, Mucro with curved apex, possessing an inner
lamella and separated from the dens, which has two
setae (fig. 2). Length of mucro about one half the
length of dens; mucro shorter than claw, the ral
between these two structures is between 3:5 and 3:4.
Anal spines on anal papillae with usual conforma-
tion.
Fig. 2—X. victwrlana asp, Mucrodens in profile.
Systematics and evolution—The new species is
genealogically very near to the group maritima,
brevisimilis and uniseta, being distinguished essen-
tially from these species by the presence of a, on
tergite abd. IV and by the absence of m, on sternite
abd. TV (character as—see phylogenetic tree—Fig.
34 in Gama 1969). Moreover, it is the only species |
know in which this seta is absent.
X, victoriana o.sp. is further separated from the
group maritima by the structure of mucrodens,
mucro being separated from the dens in the new
species, While in the species of this group mucro and
dens are fused, Thus, it seems that X. vietoriana
nsp. is anagenetically more primitive than the
species of yroup Miaritinia,
10. Xenylla grisea Axelson, 1900
Xenylla yrisea Axelson, 1900, p. 108,
Material exumined—Queensland: Emu Creek, 20
km E Warwick, rotten log, 3 specimens, leg. P.
Greenslade, 14.v.1974—in alcohol (MC), South
Australias Adelaide, 4 specimens, vy.1933 (identified
by Womersley as X. maritima),
Tl. Xenylla stachi wolffi Gama, 1967
Xenylla siachi wolffi Gama, 1967, p. 15.
Observations—This subspecies is found in the
Solomon Islands and in the New Hebrides. This is
the first time it has been found in Australia.
Material cxamined—Queensland: Cooloola, rain
forest litter, 2 specimens, leg. P. Greenslade,
23.1,,.1977—in alcohol (MC): Cooloola, War-
rawonga pitfalls. J juv., leg, P. Greenslade.
i.1977—1n aleahol (SAM); Cooloola, Warrawonga
litier, 7 specimen, teg, P. Greenslade,
29 ji1.1977—in aleohol (MC); Cooloola. Chalumbar
pilfalls, 2 specimens, leg. P. Greenslade, i, 1977—in
alcohol (MC); Cooloola, Chalambar litter, about
thirty specimens, leg. P. Greenslade, 23.i1,1977—in
(ANIC); Cooloola, Birwillah litter, 2
specimens, leg. P. Greenslade, 16.i1.1977—in
alcohol (SAM): Cooloola, Pertaringa litter, about
fifteen specimens, leg. P. Greenslade, 23.11.1977—in
alcohol (MG); Idem, about thirty specimens.
29.111,1977, 23 specimens. in alcohol (SAM): 7
specimens, on slide (MC). Northern Territory: Alice
Springs. Kunoth Paddock, hills litter, 2 specimens,
lez. P. Greenslade, 17.ii.1975—on slide (MC).
Torres Strait Islands: Murray Is., litter from vine,
bamboo forest, about twenty specimens, leg.
Cameron, 17.vii. 1974, 8 specimens, on slide and the
other specimens, in alcohol (MC).
alcohol
12. Nenylla cf. obscura Imms, 1912
Xenylla obscura Imms, 1912, p. 84.
Systematics and evolution—The populations cited
below from Australia and New Caledonia are
128
distinguished from the populations of X. obscura
from Sikkim, Nepal and India (for a redescription
see Gama 1969: 43-46) in the following features:—
1, The tip of the mucro is wider than on the
drawing represented in fig. 28.
2. The cephalic setae L, and L, are more or less
similar in length (absence of character f).
3. The cephalic seta ao is present in some
populations, but is absent in others, although within
a population some variability of this character, a,
may be observed.
4, Setae are in general blunt and not sharp as in
the other populations of X. obscura which I have
previously studied (Gama 1969 and 1971).
These populations that present the character, a,
could possibly be considered as X. hawaiiensis
Gama, 1969, because they are placed in the same
cladogenetic level as this species (fig. 34 in Gama
1969). However, in typical specimens of the species
from the Hawaii Islands the mucro is different in
form (fig. 30: 51 in Gama 1969) from the mucro
found in populations from Australian regions.
In 1971 (Gama 1971: 152-153) I verified, after
studying some populations of X. obscura from
Nepal, that ‘ta greater length of the body and a
greater development of anal spines seems to be
correlated with the absence of a; on abd. IV and the
greater length of L, in comparison with L;. A similar
correlation appears to occur between a shorter body
and a lesser development of anal spines and the
presence of a; on abd, IV and the near similarity of
length of L, and L,’’. (The above is English
rendering of the original French).
However, these populations from Australia and
New Caledonia do not have the seta a; on tergite
abd. IV and the anal spines are relatively poorly
developed. In body length, specimens from New
Caledonia are very long whilst those from Australia
are relatively short.
I have also recently examined further specimens
from Nepal which Prof. Cassagnau has kindly sent
me. In the four populations of X. obscura that I have
studied, the mucro presents the characteristic form
of the species, the setae are sharp, L, is longer than
L, (character f), the cephalic seta ay is present
(absence of character a), and the seta a, on tergite
abd. IV is absent. Anal spines are only well
developed in sample n° 65.
Material examined—Queensland: Cooloola, Kab-
ali East litter, pitfall traps, 2 specimens, leg. P.
Greenslade, i1.1977—on slide (MC); Cooloola,
Chalambar pitfalls, 1 specimen, leg. P. Greenslade,
ii.1977—in alcohol (MC). Northern Territory: Alice
REC. S, AUST. MUS. 18(5): 123-129
May, 1980
Springs, Kunoth Paddock, ungroved Mulga litter, 2
ad. + 4 juv., leg. P. Greenslade, 7.ii.1975—in
alcohol (ANIC); Idem, about fifty specimens,
15.ii.1975—in alcohol (SAM); Idem, 5 specimens,
15.1i.1975—in alcohol (MG); Alice Springs, Kunoth
Paddock, grove Mulga litter, 8 specimens, leg. P.
Greenslade, 15.ii.1975—on slide (MC); Alice
Springs, Kunoth Paddock, hills litter, numerous
specimens, leg. P. Greenslade, x.1974—on slides
and in alcohol (MC); Idem, 40 specimens, leg. P.
Greenslade, 17.ii. 1975, 34 specimens, in alcohol
(ANIC), 6 specimens, on slide (MC). South
Australia: Monarto South, Ferries-McDonald
Reserve, in Lepidosperma, 15 specimens, leg. P.
Greenslade, 2.x.1977—in alcohol (MG); near
Loxton, mallee leaf litter, 25 specimens, leg. P.
Greenslade, 25.ix.1974—in alcohol (SAM). New
Caledonia: fle Nou, on the surface of a puddle of
water, very numerous specimens, leg. G. Fabres,
28.x11.1977. sent by Prof. P. Cassagnau—on slide
and in alcohol (MC),
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by a research grant from
my country’s National Institute of Scientific
Research (Grant CB/2—Portuguese Ministry of
Education and Scientific Research).
The sample from Japan containing X. littoralis was
sent to me by Prof. R. Yosii, whom I thank very
much. My thanks are also extended to Prof. P.
Cassagnau, who forwarded the material from Nepal
and some of the material from New Caledonia.
I also thank sincerely Prof. H. Uchida, Prof. S.
Chiba and Dr. H. Tamura, who kindly provided
some types of X. arenosa Uchida and Tamura, 1967,
the study of which led me to conclude that this
species from the Japanese littoral is not X. littoralis.
Finally I am particularly grateful to Mrs. P.
Greenslade for giving me the opportunity to get to
know the Australian Xenylla species.
I should like to thank Dr. M. Tully for help in the
translation of this article.
REFERENCES
AXELSON, W. M., 1900. Vorlaiifige Mittheilung liber einige
neue Collembolen Formen aus Finnland. Medd. Soc. Faun.
et Flora fenn. 26: 105-123.
FOLSOM, J. W, 1916. North American Collembolous Insects of
the subfamilies Achorutinae, Neanurinae, and Podurinae.
Proc. U.S. nat. Mus. 50: 477-525,
GAMA, M. M. da, 1967. Collemboles du genre Xenylla trouves
dans les fles Salomon e dans |’Archipel de Bismarck (Noona
Dan Papers No. 39). Il. Mems Estud. Mus. zool, Univ.
Coimbra 300: 1-21.
GAMA, M. M. da, 1969. Notes taxonomiques et lignées
généalogiques de quarante deux espéces et sous-espéces du
genre Xenylla. II. Mems Estud. Mus. zool. Univ. Coimbra
308: 1-61.
EVOLUTIONARY SYSTEMATICS OF XENYLLA 129
GAMA, M. M. da, 1971. Nouvelle contribution 4 la connaissance
du genre Xenylla. 1V. Khumbu Himal 4: 152-155,
GAMA, M. M. da, 197la. Application de la méthode de la
“systématique idéale” A quelques espéces du genre Xenylla.
V. Revue Ecol. Biol. Sol 8(1): 189-193.
GAMA, M. M. da, 1974. Systématique évolutive des Xenylla.
VII. Espéces provenant d’Australie. Ciénc. Biol. 1(3): 71-83.
GAMA, M. M. da, 1979. ye évolutif d’une septantaine
d’espéces et sous-espéces de Xenylla provenant de tous les
continents. Revue Ecol. Biol. Sol (in press).
IMMS, A.D., 1912. On some Collembola from India, Burma and
Ceylon, with a catalogue of the Oriental species of the order.
Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond.: 80-125.
MASSOUD, Z., 1965, Les Collemboles Poduromorphes de
Nouvelle-Guinée. Annls Soc. ent. Fr. n.s.1(2): 373-391.
MILLS, N.B., 1938. Collembola from Yucatan Caves. Carnegie
Inst. Washington Publ. no. 491: 183-190.
TULLBERG, T., 1869. Om_ skadinaviska Poduriden af
Underfamiljen Lipurinae. Akad. Afhandl. Uppsala: 1-20.
UCHIDA, H., and Tamura, H., 1967. Eine neue litorale
Collembolen-Art von Hokkaido. J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido
Univ. s. VI., Zoology, 16: 234-237.
WOMERSLEY, H., 1933. A preliminary account of the
Collembola-Arthropleona of Australia, I Poduroidea. Trans.
R. Soc. S. Aust. 57: 48-71.
WOMERSLEY, H., 1939. Primitive Insects of South Australia.
Silverfish, springtails and their allies. 322 pp. Govt.
Printer, Adelaide.
MACROPODID SKELETONS, INCLUDING: SIMOSTHENURUS
TEDFORD, FROM AN UNUSUAL “DROWNED CAVE” DEPOSIT
IN THE SOUTH EAST OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
BY NEVILLE S. PLEDGE
Summary
A drowned cave in the South East of South Australia has yielded exceptionally well-preserved
vertebrate fossils, particularly of the Pleistocene macropodid Simosthenurus Tedford, to scuba
divers. Three distinct groups of Simosthenurus have been recognised, including S. gilli (Merrilees).
One (Species II) may be referable to S. orientalis (Tedford) while the third is a new species. Post-
cranial remains associated with some skulls offer, at last, definite knowledge about the anatomy of
these extinct kangaroos.
MACROPODID SKELETONS, INCLUDING: SIMOSTHENURUS TEDFORD, FROM AN UNUSUAL
“DROWNED CAVE” DEPOSIT
IN THE SOUTH EAST OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
by
NEVILLE S. PLEDGE
South Australian Museum. Adelaide. South Australia S000
ABSTRACT
PLEDGE, N. S. 1980. Macropodid skeletons, including
Simosthenurus Tedford, from a unusual “drowned caye"' deposit
in the sacl East of South Australia, Ree. S. Aust. Mus 18(6):
A drowned cave in the South East of South
Australia has yielded exceptionally well-preserved
vertebrate fossils, particularly of the Pleistocene
macropodid Simosthenurus Tedford. to scuba divers.
Three distinct groups of Simosthenurus have been
recognised, including S. gilli (Merrilees). One
(Species II) may be referable to S. orientalis
(Tedford) while the third is a new species. Post-
cranial remains associated with some skulls offer, at
last, definite knowledge about the anatomy of these
extinct kangaroos.
The geometry of the cave is described briefly and
supports an hypothesis about the accumulation of
some of the bones, It is proposed that in drought
periods during the latter stages of the last glacial
phase, when caves were the only local source of free
water, animals entered this cave to drink and some,
weukened or over-extended, fell into the under-
ground pool and could not get out. Their carcasses
sank to the bottom to leave near-complete skeletons
that were protected by the post-Glacial rising
groundwater.
INTRODUCTION
In 1964, scuba diver G. McKenzie passed to Mr.
F. W. Aslin a small quantity of bones he had
collected in a drowned cave 24 km from Mt Gambier
in the South East of South Australia. The bones
were subsequently examined by Dr. B. Daily, who
confirmed Aslin’s identification of possum bones
and a palate of the extinct macropodid Sthenurus
(s.l.). The importance of the site was therefore
apparent, and Aslin undertook to coordinate
activities in the cave so that any future finds would
he brought to the attention of the South Australian
Museum.
This paper describes the cave site and contents in
general terms and presents a possible mode of
accumulation,
In 1965, some more bones were collected and
examined by Daily who recognised kangaroo
(Muacropus sp.) and pig (Sus) remains. This material
had apparently been found near the entrance on the
talus cone where rubbish had been dumped.
The next finds were made in January, 1968, by
divers B. Brawley and G. McKenzie. Six sets of
skulls and jaws as well as other elements of
Sthenurus were collected jn three dives, most bones
being in excellent condition, The divers reported
they had located “a veritable graveyard”, with the
bones “laid out in a semi-articulated state’. The
bones occurred in little groups, each apparently
representing a single animal, Aslin quickly sought
advice from Daily on the best way of retrieving the
fragile bones. In February, brief mention of the
fossil deposit was made in an article in the local
newspaper (“South-East has Tourist Attraction
Underground”; The Border Watch, Tuesday, 27
February, 1968).
A further diving expedition in November, 1968
yielded several more jaws and partial skulls, and it
was noticeable that cranial material was becoming
less obvious.
The next expedition was in January, 1969 with
Brian Brawley diving again. Only eight dives were
possible in the two days available, but a considerable
quantity of bone, mainly post-cranial, was retrieved,
including several short sequences of articulated
vertebrae in partial skeletons of Macropus and
Sthenuris.
In May, 1968, Daily encountered a specimen from
the locality in the Australian Museum, Sydney,
where it had been taken unceremoniously by some
divers, whose account of their trip later appeared in
192 RRO S
a somewhat sensationalised article in Pix (15
February, 1969) under the title “In Deep, Blue
Water—Kangaroos Who Lived 12 000 Years Ago!”
The sinkhole named (‘'The Pines”) is nat the same
as the subject of this paper, but many of the features
mentioned are suggestive of it, and the inset
photograph was, according to Brawley, taken in the
fossil cave. In a subsequent issue (Pix, 22 March,
1969) Dr Alex Ritchie of the Australian Museum
made a plea to divers not to disturb the fossil
remains,
A final collecting expedition took place in June,
1974, to salvage any remaining obvious fossils,
following evidence that unauthorised divers had
been active in the cave, and would be returning.
Again, Brawley did the underwater work but had
trouble in finding much of significance apart from
some jaws of Simosthenurus gilli. A quantity of
scallered post-cranial material was also recovered
before the water silted up to the extent that nothing
could be seen,
METHODS
The very situation of the fossils caused special
methods to be devised for their collection, and for
plotting their relative positions.
As the fossils occurred in a flooded cave, at depths
as much as 15 m, and in total darkness, special
urrangements had to be made. Initially, two divers
operated together on the ‘‘buddy system”. Later, a
diver worked alone, connected to the surface by a
safely tine which doubled as a communication
system by way of certain signals,
Bones were exceedingly. delicate and soft when
found und were carefully transferred underwater
into a neutral buoyancy basket lined with cotton-
wool for their removal to the surface, and a shiny tag
put in their place. The specimens were carefully
washed ta remove remnants of silt and clay, dried
slowly, then treated with a dilute solution of
“Glypolin” in acetone, applied several times, to
harden the bone. Later collections were treated with
“Bedacryl” in methyl-ethy] ketone.
Determining truc relative positions of the bone
assemblages proved difficult. The positions of the
first finds were not noted but were indicated by tags
placed by divers on a later expedition, working from
memory. A grid reference system of surveying was
initially considered for fixing the position of fossils,
but was decided against because of the uneven
topography of the rock pile. Instead, the safety line
was employed as a survey instrument to determine
specimen positions, Al each paint where the diver
stopped for several minutes to pick up specimens, a
lag was attached at the surface end of the line, level
with a fixed datum point, At the same time, a
AUST, Muy, I(t: 141-14)
May, 1980
compass reading was taken on the bearing of the
line. When the rope was hauled in at the end of a
dive, the distance indicated by the tag was
measured, This system gave only marginal accuracy,
as it could not quantify the variations in slope, nor
the detours the diver might take on his descent.
More accurate on a smaller scale were the sketches
and notes made underwater by the diver, but again
distances and directions were only estinnites. lt was
found that determinations made on the same points
varied considerably on different occasions, and
correlation was exceedingly difficult. Shiny metal
tags were left at each collecting point by the divers,
ou their second and subsequent expeditions-
However, in between trips, other unauthorised but
tidy-minded divers removed most of them, and it
was subsequently found that the collectors’
memories were not sufficient to relocate these
points. Consequently, the collecting sites marked in
Figure | are mostly only tentative.
Another major problem was that of rapidly
Increasing turbidity of the water, caused by the
divers’ movements near the bottom slirring up fine
silt. It was found that two dives a day for wo days
were all that was feasible, and that the water then
took several days to clear. In fact, a 30 mitute dive
was the longest possible at any time, and this
duration rapidly diminished over a two-day period as
remnant turbidity built up,
It is likely that many bones that are missing from
the skeletal assemblages have slipped down between
rocks on the slope. However, search for them was
not attempted because of the twin-problems_ of
nonvisibility and safety.
Tooth notation is that now advocated by Archer
(197%) based on embryological evidence for three
premolars and five molars, the first of which is
replaced by P3,
OBSERVATIONS
The Cave Deposit
The South East province of South Australia js a
vast limestone shelf of Oligo-Miocene age, capped
by superficial Quaternary calcareniles (Bridgewater
Formation) in the form of stranded beach ridges
(Boutukoff 1963). Extensive cave development
occurs, und centres mainly on two areas: Naracoorte
and Mt Gambier (See Marker, 1975) In the farmer,
the caves are mostly dry or with only minor pools of
standing water, They tend to be labyrinthine,
following joint-controlled weaknesses linking larger
collapse chambers, In the Mt Gambier area, many
caves have standing water and quite a number cqn be
said to be “Drowned” following the post-placial rise
in sea level and water table, Many are designated as
sink-holes, ice. large flooded chambers breaching
MACROPODID SKELETONS, INCLUDING SIMOSTHENURUS TEDFORD 133
the land surface in small apical openings (e.g, The
Shaft), while others are typical cenotes (e.g. Little
Blue Lake). Cave formation may have occurred as
long ago as the late Miocene (Moriarty, pers.
comm.) following regional regression of the sea,
with later rejuvenation during the Pleistocene,
I consider the subject of this paper to be a
drowned caye rather than a sink-hole. The fossil
cave is essentially a large elangate chamberenlarged
by roof collapse, in which the collapse talus cone has
penetrated the breached ceiling, and full of water to
within 4m of the land surface outside, The entrance
doline is roughly oval, about 12m x 20m, aligned on
a NW-SE axis, Emergent rocks occupy the floor but
aré surrounded on nearly all sides by visible water
with free access limited to the south-eastern
quadrant. Mr Aslin has kept records of the water
table, which has fluctuated by less than Im between
winter and summer but as much as 1-8m over several
years, as the result of rainfall variations. At the low
water level, part of the ceiling of the cave is exposed,
for a distance of about 12m, A plan and longitudinal
section of the cave, as cornpiled from divers’ notes
are shown in Figure |. There is an apparent step-like
profile of the floor which may have important
implications regarding the mode of accumulation of
the fossils.
While bones were scattered over the upper floor
of the cave, apparently derived by surface
movement from the apical talus cone, the
immediately obvious feature, seen by the first divers
in the far recesses of the cave, were the discrete piles
of bones, cach of which appeared to represent a
single individual.
The Faunal Assemblage
(1) Aves
Numerous bones, mainly wing bones, indicate the
presence of small birds, but have not yet been
studied.
(2) Marsupialia
Dasyurts maculatus (P17254)—A well preserved
skull represents this taxon, undistinguishable from
the madern species, Area (Fi,
Thylacinus cynocephalus (P17257)—A fragment
of mandible with canine, premolars and first molar is
referable to this extinct species. Between Areas @
and @,
Trichosurus vulpeculus is represented by a
mandible, This may be a more recent addition, as
fossil deposits in dry caves in the region seem to be
devoid of Trichosurus while itis abundant in modern
accumulatians, Area &)
Vombatus ursinus is represented by a well-
preserved skull and jaws. It is possibly a more recent
addition to the assemblage and its exact position is
unknown.
Macropus cf. giganteus—The prey kangaroa is
represented by several specimens including an
immature skull and jaws (P17256), a mature skull
and jaws (P17457) with partial skeleton from area D
another partial skeleton (P17523) with a jaw
(P17522) but no skull from area @ footbones
(P18291) from area @. Tibiae and footbones from
between areas @and @, a partial skeleton (P17518)
from area [5](no skull or jaws).
M, rufogriseus is represented by a skull (P17255)
and isolated bones and skull fragments,
Sthenurinue
In his monograph in this family, Tedford (1966)
erected a new subgenus (Simosthenurus) for those
species of Sthenurus having particularly brachy-
cephalic skulls. He also cited a marked difference of
elevation between palatal and basicranial planes,
However, since a skull of the dolichocephalic
Sthenurus (Sthenurus) cf, atlas from Naracoorte
(Henschkes Fossil Cave) also shows this feature,
while S. gilli does not, it is felt that the character may
be more of specific importance than generic. | have
no hesitation, in view of the excellent material fram
this cave, in raising Simosthenurus to full generic
rank, and including S. gilli in i,
Inspection ceveals three distinct species of
Simosthenurus. present in this deposit, of which only.
one seems to be described:
Graup I Simoasthenurus gilli: Specimens P17248
(skull and jaws), P17265 (left maxilla), P18326
(ankylosed jaws). These are closely similar to the
Haystall Cave (Naracoorte) specimens referred by
Merrilees (1965) ta this taxon, See Table 1; Figure
2A,
Group 2 Simasthenurus Species 1: Specimens
P17246 (skull and jaws), P17247 (skull and jaws),
P1747 (partial skull lacking cranium), P17252 (left
and right jaws), P17263 (right and half of Ieft
ankylosed jaws). (Table 2 and Figure 2B). The teeth
of this taxon are superficially similar to §. gilli;
molars have the same width, but are relatively a little
longer, and have a weaker midlink with fine
crenulatians; the upper premolar is relatively
narrower and almost rectangular compared to S. gilli
where it is rather triangular due to the broader
posterior moiety: lower premolars are much
narrower than in S, gilli, The obvious. difference
however, is in the skull, Even mature specimens of
S. gilli, as estimated by dental wear, have arelatively
small, low skull far Simosthenurus (though shorter
than one of Sthenurus of equivalent breadth). In
134
contrast, even relatively young specimens of this
new taxon have a large skull, roughly equivalent in
size and shape to Simosthenurus occidentalis, The
nasals are Jang, painted and down-curved, The
zygomae are heavy and deep with a prominent
downward process opposite the first permanent
molar M*. On S_ gilli the nasals are shorter and less
curved, and there is no distinet process on the
zygoma,
Group 3 Simosthenurus Species It specimens
P17244 (skull), P17245 (skull and jaws), P17253
(skuJ] and jaws), P17250 (left and right jaws),
P17251 (juvenile left jaw). (Table 3 and Figure 3).
These Simosthenurus are tentatively referred to S.
orientalis which previously has been known only
from a few lower jaws, They have been compared
with published data (Tedford 1966; Merrilees 1965,
1967, Bartholomai 1963; and Marcus. 1976) of
Simosthenurus occidentalis, 8. oreas, 8, pales, S.
antiquus, S. orientalis, S. brownei and the unnamed
large species from Strathdownie and Haystall Cave
(Mertrilees 1965), but only S. orientalis approximates
them in lower dentition, The skulls are large, deep,
broad and shortfaced: one specimen (P17245) is sa
well preserved that even the delicate postpalatine
bar is retained intact.
One of the exciting aspects of this fossil discovery
is the presence of more-or-less complete skeletons,
associated with identifiable skulls, Several partial
skeletons referable to Sthenurus s.1, have been
recovered, aud are being studied. As a preliminary
guide, however, certain bones may be distinguished
from Muecropus thus:
femur cobust, relatively greater shaft diameter,
shaft eurved convex forwards,
tibia robust, relatively shorter length and greater
shaft diameter. slight sinuous curve when viewed
anteriorly.
scapula: shart and broad blade, very strong and
long acromion process of spine, anterior moiety of
blade reduced to distal carner only.
pelois less triangular and mare ovate obturator
foramen than in Macropus; ihac blades broad.
flarings ventral (pubes) suture relatively shorter.
Epipubic bone ts 4 large broad blade, more than
Iwice as long and wide asin Macropys of same pelvic
SIZE.
Cervical vertebrae very short, with the centrum
about 19 mm long fora transverse diameter of up to
50 mm.
At least one of the skulls has a known associated
partial skeleton, This is P17471, Simosthenurus sp, 1,
from area @, and the remains consist of the pelvis
and sacral vertebrae, right epipubie, both femora,
left tibia and fibula, both arms, most cervical and
dorsal vertebrae (only Sth cervical and 12th thoracic
REC. S. AUST. MUS
IR(®)> Lally] May, 1980
vertebrae are missing), some proximal caudal
vertebrae, and a broken series of ribs. Other partial
skeletons are less complete, at the moment, and
there is some doubt abour their associated skulls
because they were not always collected during the
same dive, or even the same expedition.
DISCUSSION
The deposit is so unusual and contains such well
preserved material, that it readily lends itself to
speculation concerning the mode of accumulation,
(t is almost certain that the cave contains an
assemblage of mixed ages, even without the modern
rubbish dumped there, Material being added at the
top of the rock pile must inevitably move by sheet
wash, surface creep or other disturbances further
down the slope. In doing so, however, it alsa would
become dissociated and contribute to the extensive
collection of isolated bones, This process has
continued at Jeast as long as the situation has
approximated that of the present iime, with the
water level close to the surface, indeed, within easy
reach of thirsty animals.
However, a Sarge proportion of specimens ace af
extinct species, the bones often associated or even
semi-articulated as in several instances of vertebrae.
This implies that there have been no distutbances
since the eadavers came to rest, and also the
skeletons hayeé an age of at least 10 000 years, The
actual date of extinction of the Pleistocene
megafauna is not known, but is more likely to be
related to climatic/environmental changes associated
with the end of the last glacial period than with any
other simple cause, Martin (1447), Merrilees (1968)
and others notwithstanding; and the present
(Holocene) mild climatic regime is generally
considered to have started 10 000 years ago (Bowler
et al. 1976).
During the glacial stages of the Pleistocene. much
seawater was removed as huge continental ice
sheets, with the result that sea Jevels were
universally depressed, Consequently, so too was the
water-table in the Mount Gambier area. Aceord-
ingly, the water level in the cave would be lower,
und possibly some considerable distance inside. even
heyond the “twilight zone”. It is quite possible that
at the glacial maximum when sea levels were
possibly as much as L30m Jower than at present
(Flint 1971) the cave was totally dry, and an animal
could conceivably wander to the bottom and die ona
rock and be undisturbed until the divers came. In
reaching this position in the dark, however, it would
scatter and break many of the remains already there.
Yet the evidence is for numerous complete or partial
skeletons resting undisturbed on rock slabs.
MACROPODID SKELETONS, INCLUDING SIMOSTHENURUS TEDFORD
1 am suggesting here, that the cave had a
substantial lake when the “skeleton” individual
entered it. This is based on an idea by B- Brawley,
who noted that some distance from the entrance,
there is a steplike break in the slope, about 7m
below present water level (see fig. 1), If the water
has reached that point, there would be a steep,
possibly insuperable bank ta the lake. In this
scenario, any animal seeking water during a drought
period, such as in the Late Pleistocene (Bowler et al,
1976), would have to stretch in order to drink, and if
it stretched too far and fell in, it might not be able to
clamber out, but would struggle until it drowned or
died of exhaustion. The cadaver might float for a
while, disintegrating slowly, or sink immediately to
leave a beautifully laid-out skeleton on the bottom.
The situation is somewhat like the Morwell fire-hole
deposit of kangaroos excavated by Rich (1977),
except that there has been no areal concentration of
the skeletons by prevailing winds. The alternative
hypothesis that the 'skeletan’’ kangaroos entered a
dry cave is not acceptable, since it requires some
unknown form of protection far the skeletons until
the rising groundwater had covered them,
Using hydrological data gathered in recent years,
Mr. Aslin (pers. comm, 1979) has calculated that a
water level at the break-in-slope, about 7 m below
the present level, would correspond (at a first
approximation) to a sea level drop of about 20m,
Applying this amount to the sea level record curves
figured by Chappell (1978: fig. 1:10) gives an age of
8 000-9. 000 years, which is quite outside expecta-
tions based on fossil evidence elsewhere in
Australia. No dated Holocene site has yielded ia situ
Sthenurus 8,1, This suggests that the relationship
between water table and sealevel in this area is not
as simple as has been supposed, The age of the
specimens must be sought by more direct methods,
With this in mind, an attempt was made in 1974 to
abtain material for dating, Bottom sediments proved
to be useless calcite flakes. There was hope of
finding pollen in the fine silt filling one skull but it
proved to be too oxidized. The age, therefore, will
remain unknown until or unless associated charcoal
or wood is found. However, circumstantial palaeo-
climatological evidence, provided by work in
western Victoria (Bowler et al. 1976) and elsewhere,
suggests that the associated skeletal specimens might
date from the cold arid period of the last glacial
phase, approximately 17 000 to 14 000 years ago, if
the scenario proposed above is correct.
145
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author owes a debt of gratitude to Mr F. W.
Aslin of Mt Gambier for his untiring interest and
enthusiasm in organising the collection of the
specimens described herein, and to Dr B. Daily for
making it available for study, Also to be thanked are
the several divers, Messrs G. McKenzie, R. Pulford,
and particularly B. Brawley, who made most of the
collections. The manuscript was typed by D.
Scipioni and J, Casaretto and Figure 1 drawn by J,
Thurmer,
REFERENCES
ARCHER, M_ 1978. The nature of the molar—premojar
boundary jn marsupials and 2 reinterpretation of the
homalogy ot marsupial cheekteeth, Mem, Od Mus. 18 (2):
157-164.
BOUTAKOFF, N. 1963. The geology and geamorphology of the
Se age area Geol. Surv. Vict. Mem. 22: 1-117, Sappend., 6
tab.
BOWLER, J, M.. HOPE, G_S_.JENNINGS, J, N.; Singh, G, &
Walker D, 1976, Lale Qualernary climates of Australia and
New Guiner, Quaternary Researeh 6: 359-394.
CHAPPELL, J. 1978. Chronological methods and the ranges and
rates of Quaternary physical changes in Biology. anil
Quaternary Environments (ed. D, Walker & J, G. Guppy)
Aust, Acad, Sei., Canberra, 1-34,
FLINT, R, F. 197]. Glacial and Quatemary Geology, Wiley, New
York, XIE + 892pp..
MARKER, M. E, 1975. The Lower Southeast of South Australia:
a karst province. Occas. Pap. 13. Dept Geogr, and Envir,
Studies, Univ. Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa,
MARTIN. P. S. 1967. Prehistoric overkill. in ‘Pleistocene
Extinctions, The Search for a Cause,’ (ed, PS. Martio, & H,
E. Wright, Jr.). Yale Univ, Press, New Haven.
MERRILEES, D. 1965. Two species of the extinct genus
Sthenurus Owen (Marsupiala, Macropodidae) from south-
eastern Australia. including Sthenurus gillisp. nov. J. R. Soc
W. Aust. 48 (1): 22-32.
MERRILEES, D, 1967. South-western Australian occurrences of
Sthenurus (Marsupiala, Macropodidae) including Srhenurus
brownei sp. nov. J. R. Soc. W. Aust. 50 (3): 65-79.
MERRILEES, D- 1968. Man the Destroyer: Late Quaternary
changes in the Australian marsupial fauna. J. R, Soc. W
Ausi, 51 (1); 1-24.
RICH, T. H_ V. 1976, Recent fossil discoveries in Victoria. Vict
Nat, 93: 198-206,
TEDFORD, R. H. 1966, A review of the Macropodid genus
Sthenurus, Univ. Calif. Publs in Geol. Sciences 87: 1-72.
NOTE ADDED IN PROOF
The large but microdont species Sfmosthenurus sp,
1 of this paper has recently been recognized in cave
deposits at Naracoorte. where it has been named
Sthenurus maddocki. (Wells, R. & Murray, P., 1979:
A uew Sthenurine (Marsuptaha, Macropodidac)
from southeastern Sourl Australia. Trams. R. Soc,
S. Anst 103 (8); 213-219.)
May, 1980
TABLE 1. SIMOSTHENURUS GILLI, TOOTH DIMENSIONS (LENGTH x MAXIMUM WIDTH)
131-141
REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18(6):
136
c
i]
3
Cc
g=8
gSs
22s
Ee?
gen
wm
%
15:5 x 113
9-5 x 10-1
10:5 x 10-4
10-8 x 10-8
10-8 x 10-9
Fonte)
i)
a
ad
Bist
oc
——
11:3 x 10-4
14-5x 9-9
14:4 x 10-0
x
w own =
S Ao ao
=
“ ad eK
wy aD =m
eltolen
cS tun io seo,
S$) 34
9
ann
me
oo
oc
oo
11-5 x 10-0
11-4x 9-8
11-6 x 10-0
11-4x 10-1
+H
oo
es
eo
ww
ae
mare
‘Tx 93
Ox 9-9
9
10-
“Data from Merrilees (1965); means taken to one decimal place
TABLE 2. SIMOSTHENURUS SP. 1. TOOTH DIMENSIONS (LENGTH x MAXIMUM WIDTH)
cS
uv
£
vu
v
ios
nn
95x 81
16-5 x 11-3
Sx 95
10-5 x 10-5
10-7 x 10-4
xX
10-6 x 10-8
10-6 x 10-6
x
x
Lat
11:3 x 10-7
11:3 x 10-8
x
x
oo
oo oo
“x
aw
mw
oe!
PAA
tm oo
we
o>
ww
me
wy ies
~~
me O
aed
ww
a
Oy
00 06
ad
awn
wo
al
ene
2 90
>
sm
=3S
4
aes
oO GO
mK
Pui
Ho
“S
ack
90 0
mK
mo
=D
aa
ne)
na
x
| nie
a4
ee
o} a]
an o an
=
| «| lw] |
So] ml] &
= “4 i)
ham = heal
me faq lad
nO coo coo
|
i
Wafer [es
| nial mre ae
ae ee -——
ao |or |e
an oo oo
Cad mK mr
Mae | E> | eft
aA ae ae
ae tae c-
wa low [or
aAn!| oo of
Cad Cad
AN | mer
sa lan|as
ore Sn ol
yD
oO
a)
a.
3s
REIS
25
o
Luo] *
So va)
-&
“wslS
i=)
2g
_
oO
im
2d
st
Eol Tt
. avy n
SE] *
gs
21S
WE
a]
i=)
A]
can
ee
re
* x
OF
rr
Salam
compared with S. occidentalis, S. brownei, S. oreas and S. orientalis
TABLE 3. SIMOSTHENURUS SP. Il, TOOTH DIMENSIONS, (LENGTH x MAXIMUM WIDTH)
MACROPODID SKELETONS, INCLUDING SIMOSTHENURUS TEDFORD
#3 > i & 3
S Qa _ is] mn
ok | fa * “ “
5S 2 ce |o |a
De ~ tt w wn
zg
&
D
Fe +t inal a
oe + toa) oe ae As :
“ t t S q
ao io 00. poral = — 4
os > tad bad * bd “
~ silt |e |e |e le [sz
“ ire) + S al t oO
< I = — 4 —
Oo an al aT So a
CQ bch S = = = °9 so wn = a }
Lol n Lon rc cael Sol ~ an co font fo.) Col
* “ “ » x * * x be x x *
a 2 6 st 09 ™ DQ t+ a Q > “o
vay —) 3} = 4 _ oO + a S = a
4 — = = -_ 4 _ — a) WH
~ Ne) - a a é~ s nn a
a 3S _ = a 4 S I a 4 — S
aol = ao oa al tan is] ool 00 loa] - -
* * * * * = = ba ~ * ~ ”
o |e [a Jo [= |e eo |> [oe |e [a Jo
~ an o - nN rm On so a i=) a4 —
kon “=~ = = a Sol foal Sal _
owlan [ast [am ac lan |ouw
Soo pea rast [| ae ~~ exvee, |S | Oe | Oe
TS D8 | ey +m
SQ (SS 14S )48 7) R | we aq |S /S8ea/e2
| | | we | we | ee | ww | we mies | | | | wwe] wee | ew | em
TO /er lag [of | ae hes mo 19S [GS] eH
ang laa [4H [Hw | ts a os [ttle lau
Se I of ee an ae ae ee re Se aed Sn al -—<—
to mo lot [om |e ee SO | am | om
aa a tt [tt [an So > fh mae faa | aa
aM helen! ad an aS w Aan noe) ac ae
we] | | | ww | ee | ee | ee a De ee
‘GAO Qe pom | com PANS L eo." So} Te | on
mo Ag lst [Hwy [ast ww ma | on +
mre ere me ae a<- Cael ae ae ae
00 COD | Ort | COD | Ors ey Dw pcm paw9
aa at lah [tt [os roa) i) ir) alam
ae nar ae oe 5 nl onl Ww re ce ce ae
wee] | | | we | oe | me me | oe Ql || jlexd | | | we] ee | ee
990 SM 1 SSD | OS | MK a 200 So laga tag
ee am [ow [tt | tt Vana an [sa | oo
ae cer Ke ree Ciao coer ae ae re
an oo lanm [to |g TF TO [MoS | oer
ac an | + tt [a n tT aa mn
ae ae — 5 aioe] <4 ao Calon aA 5 ni eel ae
xe | | | | em | we | me | Ke QS] |] tweed | | | we | ewe | ew
70 wr | me |ow fon ra ad |ome |an
00 aa fest ltt [om var aa les [ow
ne nae mre re te oe | ee ae tei el ee
wen to, jor / tam ‘S bt] > ;
am + Vala) ++ ow | Y S a at +
Se oe | ei ool as [ian 4 wn On Sol Se) Smal Smal
wm | | | | eu | eK | oe | oe be Pye l ddd del|el dx «|
>t com | aa | ao loa mle a |o fm [re
00 00 a ta [+ “ aa i a + Val
te ool ae Se ee Cian Set onl Cel Sal te rn rt
ae 7 € 2: Li ae S . 3 ia: * 2 2 3 :
ant ne a4 rar res v ¢ 2 : : : a ;
35 tee ; ~ zt 3) > et r xt "
F : : o] : : : :
; : : ol] o: co 8
t : i aay
pn 1 ry &¢ f€ g€
Be & EE Se EE
14-6 x 12-7
11-3 x 10-3
10:8 x 10-7
137
REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18(6): 131-141 May, 1980
138
‘saul] JO ssauajatduios
Aq payesrpur uorsisaid ‘sayojays pue sajou ,siaarp wo payidwios yied sajeasopun ‘usw “A “4 Aq Aaains ssedurod pue
ade} uo paseq dew aavjing ‘says Suroaj[oo Jo suoltsod ajeutxoidde Surmoys ‘dAvd [ISSO] ay JO UOTJ9as JeUIpNIsuO] puke ue]|g—|] “OA
_
7 >"
wee 4 \
ma /, et
a ga Se
iF} 149% : !
nad \ V 7
‘ / vY’
\ ‘ v
\ of
See
— os \\ | }
, — el ier we S 4
bart Tel —_—_— —— —_— >
ise
6a => _-
mS.
{Zl =, ,* byw
a a (Li (Ey 7 —
“7
itl “Ll #91
Wee
TH ds ot cst
a va
“Ss
~ —
a
— ————
= 6
“XN
\
y)
(sasjeuwW)
uydep yods
1
' | i | jl
a ate ee a
—- Nw !
I
!
1
a, | jeunousoo
SNS eee EE ae
$01}OWW
MACROPODID SKELETONS, INCLUDING
<=
FIG, 2—A. Simosthenurus gilli Merrilees), P17248 Skull and
jaws. Area 1.
B. Simosthenurus sp. I, P17247 Skull and jaws. Area 4.
SIMOSTHENURUS TEDFORD
140 REC, S. AUST. MUS. 18(6); 131-141 May, 1980.
FIG, 3—Simosthenurus sp. Il, P17245 Skull and jaws. Area 2,
MACROPODID SKELETONS, INCLUDING SIMOSTHENURUS TEDFORD 141
FIG, 4—Simosthenurus sp.1, associated bones (approx. X1/3)
Area 1,
A right scapula (s), humerus (h), ulna (u) and radius (7)
P17476
B. right pelvis P17494
C, left femur (f), tibia (t) and fibula (fl)—anterior view
P17475
D. ditto, lateral view
RECORDS oF THE
SOUTH AUSTRALIAN
MUSEUM
VOLUME 18 NUMBERS 7—9 _ 30 January 1981
No. 7 THE GENERA LACCOBIUS AND NOTHYDRUS (COLEOPTERA, HYDRO-
PHILIDAE) IN AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND
by ELIO GENTILI
No. 8 THE FABRICIAN TYPES OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND
COLEOPTERA IN THE BANKS COLLECTION AT THE BRITISH
MUSEUM (NATURAL HISTORY)
by WINIFRED P. K. RADFORD
No. 9 SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SOILS
1. NOTATION. 2. BIFEMORATA and PTYCTIMA (CRYPTOSTIGMATA)
by DAVID C, LEE
SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM
North Terrace, Adelaide
South Australia 5000
THE GENERA LACCOBIUS AND NOTHYDRUS (COLEOPTERA,
HYDROPHILIDAE) IN AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND
BY ELIO GENTILI
Summary
A key to the Australian and New Zealand genera of the water beetle family Hydrophilidae,
subfamily Hydrobiinae, tribe Hydrobiini, subtribe Hydrobiae is given and the Australian and New
Zealand species of Laccobius Erichson, 1837 and Nothydrus Balfour-Browne, 1939 are described
or redescribed and figured. Laccobius is represented in Australia by the species L. (Notoberosus)
zietzi (Blackburn, 1895). L. (Platylaccobius) clarus n.sp., L. (Platylaccobius) decipiens n.sp., L.
(Macrolaccobius) marmoratus Macleay, L. (Macrolaccobius) matthewsi n.sp., L. (Macrolaccobius)
bicaudatus n.sp., L. (Macrolaccobius) collium n.sp., and L. (Macrolaccobius) brittoni n.sp., and in
New Zealand by L. (Platylaccobius) arrowi d’Orchymont, 1925. Nothydrus is found only in
Australia where it is represented by N. australis (Blackburn, 1891) and N. montanus (Blackburn,
1891). The differences between Nothydrus and Laccobius are discussed and other genera to which
Nothydrus may be closely related are noted.
THE GENERA LACCOBIUS AND NOTHYDRUS (COLEOPTERA, HYDROPHILIDAE) IN AUSTRALIA
AND NEW ZEALAND
by ELIO GENTILI
Museo del Seminario, Venegono Inf, 21040, Italy,
Abstract
GENTILI, Elio. 1980, The genera Laccohius and Nothydrus
(Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) in Australia and New Zealand,
Ree. S. Aust, Mus. 18 (7): 143-154,
A key to the Australian and New Zealand genera
of the water beetle family Hydrophilidae, subfamily
Hydrobiinae, tribe Hydrobiini, subtribe Hydrobiae
is given and the Australian and New Zealand species
of Laecobius Erichson, 1837 and Nothydrus Balfour-
Browne, 1939 are described or redescribed and
figured, Laccobius is represented in Australia by the
species L, (Notoberosus) zietzi (Blackburn, 1895). L.
(Platylaccabius) clarus n.sp., L. (Platylaccobius)
decipiens n.sp,, L, (Macrolaccobius) marmoratus
Macleay, L. (Macralaccobius) matthewsi n.sp,, L,
(Macrolaccobius) bicaudatus n.sp., L. (Macrolac-
cobius) callium n.sp., and L. (Macrolaccobius)
brittoni np., and in New Zealand by L,
(Platylaccobius) arrowi d'Orchymont, 1925. Nathyd-
rus is found only in Australia where it is represented
by N. australis (Blackburn, 1891) and N. montanus
(Blackburn, 1891), The differences between Nothyd-
rus and Laccobius are discussed and other genera to
which Nothydrus may be closely related are noted.
INTRODUCTION
Members of the genera Laccobius and Nothydrus
lire aquatic Coleoptera found in both stagnant and
running freshwater. The first genus is widespread,
hemny absent only from South America, the second is
Australian. They belong to the family Hyd-
rophilidae, subfamily Hydrobiinae, tribe Hydro-
hint, subtribe Hydrobiae (see d'Orchymont 1942).
The genera of Hydrobiae d'Orchymont. 1919, in
Australia and New Zealand may be distinguished by
the following key.
fev te Australian and New Zealand Hydrobiae
1, Hind teachanters with an clongate apex and separaled from
the femoru at their tip, Elytra withoul purasutural furrows.
Six abdominal segments, the sixth somewhat retractile into
the ile _Laceobius Erichson, 1837
Hind frochanters not elongate. Elytra with parasutiural
furrows, Five dhdominil segments —. , . . 2
2 (1) Regolur longitudina| tines of punctures on elyrra,
Antenne 9 segmented, Meso- und meta-tursi with the first
article shorter than second, Larger body sive: length more
thha+ pn 3
Flyteal pinerires noi, or only on hind and lateral surface.
arninged in longitudinal tines but randomiy disposed
Antennue 7-9 segmented. Size normally less than 4 mm
5
3. (2) Mesa- snd metie-tars’ without long swimming setae.
Meso- and meta-lernora without hydrofugal hairs. Body
posteriorly enlarged , Hybogralius WOrchymont,, 1942
Upperside of meso- and meta-tarsi with long swimming
setae. Meso-and meta-femora with hydrofugal hairs... 4
4. (3) Pro-, meso-, and anteriorly meta-sternum keel-shaped in
the middle Limroxenus Motsehulsky, 1853
Only the mesosternum sometimes keel-shuped jn the
middle Hydrobius Leach. 1818
5S. (4) Prosternunt keel-shaped in the middle. Hind femora
without dense hydrofugal hairs Paracymus Thomson, 1867
Prosternum Without any longitudinal keel. Hind temora, ut
least anteriorly, with dense hydrofugalhairs,........ 6
6. (5) Labium deeply excavated. Fifth antennal article
cupuliform Elytral rows postertorly conspicuous
Nolhydrus Balfour-Browne, 1939
Labjum anteriorly nor excavated. Elytra without longitudinal
tows of punctures, Fifth antennal article normally
shuped Memmi: Anacaena Thomson, 1859
SYSTEMATICS
The venus Laccobius is recognizable chiefly by the
following features. A convex, oval bady, not capable
of rolling up. Head with a Y-shaped suture and
entire eyes; sometimes the male with two specula
under the labium; antenna 8-segmented (53), the
filth article asymmetrically cup-shaped; maxillary
palpi shorter than antennae, with penultimate article
shorter than ultimate, Pronotum without furrows or
keels; prosternum keel-shuped in the middle;
anterior tarsi expanded in the male. Scutellum a
subequilateral triangle; mesosternum usually with a
longitudinal keel and a small tooth in front of the
keel; middle femora without hydrofugal hairs
(sometimes these are represented by a small basal
tuft, but not in Australian specimens): elytra, as a
rule (and always in Australian species), without
parasutural furrows, Wings provided with can-
tharidiform neryation. Metasternum without any
keel, in the middle with a small glabrous area: hind
trochanters with an clongate apex and separated
from the femora at their tip; hind femora without
hydrofugal hairs; hind tibiae usually curved. Six
abdominal segments, without any keel; the sixth
somewhat retractile into the fifth, Pro, mid- and
hind tarsi with the first article shorter than the
second, and the Jast shorter than the others
combined.
The subgenera in our region are the following:
|. Notoberosus Blackburn, 1895 (syn. fh. |
Ortholaceobius Ganglbauer, 1904), It has
straight hind tibiae. This feature is alsa
i44
. Hind tibiae straight: subg. Notaberosus .. .
REC, 8. AUST. MUS. IS (7):
typical of the subgenus Ortholaccobius
Ganglbauer, 1904; the two subgenera, in my
opinion, are to be united. The differences are
chiefly two, both in the male of zietzi
(Notoberosus); the specula and the lack of a
mesoternal keel. These differences disappear
in the female, and are therefore inadequate
to form the basis for the separation of two
subgenera. Notoberosus are very numerous in
New Guinea and in surrounding islands. The
other three subgenera have curved hind
tibiae.
5
Microlaccobius Gentili, 1974 is characterized
by the pattern of the elytral series,
alternately more regular, more impressed,
more punctate, and less regular, less impres-
sed, less punctate, The subgenus appears to
be the most primitive, owing to lack of
specula, and to the small, weakly chitinized
and simply structured aedeagus.
Macrolaccobius Gentili, 1974 is, like the
preceding, a subgenus widespread in the
Palaearctic, and Oriental regions. It has
more complex features; the elytral series
more irregular, an evolved aedeagus, and
sometimes specula and tufts of hairs on the
middle femora.
Tit.
IV. Platylaccobius Gentili, 1974 is characterized
by the lack or reduction of the elytral
seriation, The body is normally flat, more so
than in Micro-and Macrolaccobius, and the
aedeagus more complex than in Microlac-
cobius,
Key lo species
zietzi Blackburn
Hind tibiae curved | .,,.-..,.)-- ene ff, Lae. 2
. (1) Elytral punctures randomly placed and not forming any
ong of taws or lines, rately in ee | and ai ak
ines, rows or whorls subg, Platylaccobius . 3
Elyral punctures in about 20 longitudinal curved lines, © 5
. (2) Pronotam without a dark spot, or the dark Spot is very
feeble and indistinct; aedeagus asin Fig 2a, clarusa. sp.
A distinet dark spot on the pronotum._.. iCeee vent 4
. (3) Body length twice (or more than twice) the breadth.
Australian species, Acdeagus asin Fig. 2c, d
decipiens n.sp
Body length less tham twice the pik or New Zealand
species. Aedcagus as in Fig. 3.4a,b |. arrowid'Orchymon(
(2) Elytra! punctures alternately (in primary series) more
regular, more impressed and more punctate. and in
secondary series, not régular, weakly imprestent and
scarcely punctate. Size smal], subg. Microlaccabius . 6
Elytral punctures are in series not so alternated, same of
them are irregular, with mixed small nig large punctures,
subg. Macrolaceobius , a
(43-154 January [YS]
6. (5) Labium extended posteriorly in the shape of a V reaching
the postlabium, hind margin of propygidium deeply
excised: aedeagus asin Fig. 4a,6., . marmoratus MacLeay
Hind margin of the labium slightly sinuous medially;
propygidium not excised; aedeagus as in Fig. 4 ed
matthewsi 1.sp.
7, (5) A large preocular patch, Hind apex of each elytron
separated from the other, leaving a large triangular space
between them .... . bicaudatus n.sp.
No prevcular patches, Hind apex of each alesis close lo the
other in resting position. Smaller body size - ee,
8. (7) Aedeagus wider, more complex, 46 1h Fig Sa, b
collin n-sp-
Aedcapus narrower and simple, asin Fig. 3 ¢.d briranin-sp
1. Laeccobius (Notoberosus) zietzt (Blackburn 1895)
(Figs | a, bz 7)
Blackburn, 1895S (Noroberosus); Zaitzev, [908
(Notoberosus); Knisch, 1924 (Notoberosus); d'Orchy-
mont, 1925; 1937; 1948.
Body length 3-0-3-9 mm; breadth 1-35-1-73 mm-
Elongated, more than twice as long as wide.
Labium dark or metallic, sometimes with pale
sides, or entirely pale except in middle; surfuce
ulutaceous; anterior edge sinuous in male, straight in
female, the posterior curved. Head dark or metallic,
with large preocular patches reaching eyes; the
patches sometimes united; surface very slightly
alutaceous, with fine and scatiered punctures, Eyes
taken together scarcely smaller than intervening
distance. Pronotum yellowish, sometimes reddish,
ot with some small evanescent dark spots in central
area; smooth in male, hardly shagreened in female.
Corners of pranotum rounded, the hind corners very
widely so (more than in minutus). Scutcium pale or
dark, with very thin punctures, Elytra yellowish,
with or without a number of dark spots, but always
pale on edges; the punctures are slightly darkened,
numerous. irregularly scattered (but tending to form
5-6 series, chiefly near the suture), of various size,
Elytral apex nearly vertical.
Cnderside dark, except head, pronetum~ palpi,
antennae and legs. Labium of male has two specula
nearly circular in shape. The postlabium (or
mentum) is rugose. its anterior margin sinuous.
Prosternum short, keel-shaped; mesosternum
weakly but distinctly keel-shaped in female, gibbous
in male, the keel not anteriorly abrupt. Hind margin
of fifth abdominal segment deeply sinuous in male,
Antennae 8-segmented (Blackburn (1895) enumera-
ted 6 segments); legs slender, the hind tibiae
straight. Aedeagus (Fig. 1 a, b) 1/3-5 of body length;
tegmen longer than parameres, which are rounded
at apices; median lobe sulcate and pointed at apex.
South Australian species (Fig. 7), with the
following distribution: Lake Callabonna (type
locality, 10 ex. leg, A. Zietz); River Wakefield,
THE GENERA LOCCOBIUS AND NOTHYDRUS IN AUST. AND NEW ZEALAND
f
f
/f
37
1.0
O05
145
Fig. 1—Aedeagus of Laccobius zietzi, lectotype, Lake Cal-
labonna, South Australia: A, frontal view, B, lateral view.
Prepared in euparal, soluble in absolute alcohol, like the
following aedeagi. The same scale applies to all of the text.
Figures 1-6,
near Adelaide (2 ex.); Levi Creek, 6 km NW Big
Perry Spring 28° 19° 2S, 136° 16" 1E (17 ex., leg. J.
A. Herridge, 7.X11,1974); Coopers Creek, Ferry
Crossing (1 ex., leg. J. A. Herridge, 30.XI.1974).
The specimens are in the South Australian Museum,
Adelaide, and in the Museums of Verona and
Milano, Italy.
Lectotype: South Australian Museum, Adelaide:
3-4x 1-55 mm; labels: L. Mulligan/L. Callabonna A.
Zietz/9.6580 Notoberosus zietzi Blkb. L. Callabonna
type /l1. d Paratypus 2. Lectotypus; Laccobius
(Notoberosus) zietzi (Blackburn 1895); det. E.
Gentili 1976. Another 7 specimens in the S.A.
Museum labelled in the same manner as the
lectotype are to be considered paratypes.
2. Laccobius (Platylaccobius) clarus n.sp.
(Figs. 2 a, b: 8)
Body length 2-4-3-1 mm; breadth 1-2-1-7 mm.
Elongated, nearly twice as long as wide, very slightly
convex.
Fig. 2—A, B, Aedeagus of Laccobius clarus, holotype, Adelaide,
South Australia: A, frontal view, B, lateral view; C,D, Aedeagus
of Laccobius decipiens, holotype, Tamworth. New South Wales:
C, frontal yiew, D, lateral view.
C
>
146
Labium large, dark or metallic with pale angles,
alutaceous, with anterior edge straight, the posterior
curved. Head dark or metallic, with large preocular
patches reaching eyes, the patches taken together
are of the same width as. intervening space, the
whole surface shagreened and closely punctured.
Prothorax testaceous, with a small evanescent dark
spot in its central-anterior area; the surface
shagreened and punctured like the head; fore
margin sinuous, slightly prominent if centre (in
arrowi it is straight). Seurellum pale or scarcely
darkened, with a number of very thin punctures.
Elytra pale, testaceons (sometimes darkened owing
to ‘actio pest mortem’); the punctures are numerous,
larger than those of pronotum, but similar to each
other in size, irregularly scattered, darkened on
elytral disc, clear at the edges; the humeri are
conspicuous. Posterior apex ogival.
Underside dark, excepting head, pronotum,
abdominal sides. palpi, antennae and legs. Post-
labium flat, nor rugose, with very fine punctures; the
fore margin curved. Prasternum short (its length ts‘
that of the pula), keel-shaped. Mesosternum keel-
shaped on its anterior 4, with an anteriorly abrupt
tooth on its fore apex. Hind margin of propygidium
nearly straight in female, lightly curved in male.
Palpi. antennae and legs of the normal pattern.
Aedeagus (Fig. 2 a, b) |i of body length, with a
large median lobe, shorter than parameres, the
median lobe sometimes shows a small mobile strut
near the apex.
The species is known from South Australia, New
South Wales and Queensland (Fig. 8), and is among
the commonest Australian Laecabius. South Aus-
tralia: Adelaide (type locality, 11 ex., leg. T-
Blackburn et al.); Hindmarsh Falls (2 ex., leg. E. B.
Britton-N. Tindale, at light, 23-24.X11.1961); Well,
near Oraparinna (1 ex,, leg. G. F. Gross, at light.
12.11.1956); Karoanda to Peebinga (2 ex., leg. G. E.
H, Wright); Murray River, E Adelaide (1 ex,, leg,
H, S, Cope); Frome River crossing of Birdsville
Track, near Maree (4 ex., leg. G. FP. Gross, at light,
25.X. 1966); 10 km N Maynards Well. N Flinders
Range (1 ex., leg. J. A, Herridge, at light,
11.X1L.1974); Brachina Gorge, Flinders Range (6
ex., leg, J. A. Herridge, at light, 14,X11,1974);
Muddle Bore, 35 km NE Billa Kalina (3 ex., leg. J.
A. Herridge. at light, 4.X1I.1974): Margaret River,
10 km SE Coward Springs (2 ex., leg. J. A
Herridge, at light, 3.XI1.1974); Marree Racecourse
(13 ex., leg. J. A. Herridge, at light, 1.061974),
Levi Creek, 8 km NW Big Parry Spring 28° 19° 2S,
136° 16° JE (J ex, leg. J. A. Herridge, at light,
7.X1I. 1974); Coopers Creek. Ferry Crossing (38
ex., ley. J. A. Herridge, at light, 30.X1.1974); 5-5
km WNW Myrtle Springs (1 ex., leg. E. G.
Matthews, 2-3.111.1975); 37 km W of Anna Creek (1
REC, & AUST, MUS TS (7): 193-154
January, 198]
ex., leg. E. G. Matthews, 8-9.[t1.1975), Coward
Springs (1 ex., leg, G. F, Gross, at light, 9, X1, 1966).
New South Wales: Murray River, 50 mi. W of
Wentworth (14 ex.. leg. A. Neboiss 22.X1.1967)
Queensland: Cunnamulla (1 ex,. leg. AH. Hardeas-
tle); Dear River, 23° 13'S, 144° 04 E, 31 km NW by
N of Longreach (3 ex., leg. M. S. Upton,
22.X.1975); Biedsville (4 ex., leg, J. Blyth,
11-V.1975). Australia (2 ex. Call. Fairmuire; 2 ex.
Pascoe Call, ).
Holotype: British Museum; 2-7 * 1-35 mim:
labels: Australia; Adelaide /Sharp Call. 1905-313 /
Laccobius (Plarylaccohius) clarus n. sp. E. Gentili
det, 1976 / ¢ Halotypus.
Allotype: British Museum; 2-9 » 1-45 mmj similar
labels. the Paratypes ace those of the former list:
they are in the following Natural History Museums:
British Museum; Musée de Paris; Museo di Verona;
Museo di Milano; South Australian Museum,
CSIRQ: National Museum of Victoria.
3. Laccobius (Platylaccobius) decipiens n, sp,
(Fig. 2 c, d; 7)
d'Orchymoent, 1925 (L. marmoratus).
Body length 2-9-3-9 mm; breadth 1-5-2-0 mm.
Flongated, oval, nearly twice as long as wide.
Labium entirely dark or metallic, alutaceous, with
a straight anterior margin. Head dark or metallic,
with preocular patches reaching eyes, but somewhat
smaller than in clarus; surface shagreened and
closely punctured, the punctures more numerous
and more impressed than in clarus. Pronotum pale,
festaccous, with a dark spot longer than wide,
reaching the fore margin more widely than the hind,
and slightly expanded in the hind half; surface
similar to that of head, shagreened and punctured;
fore margin sinuous, slightly prominent in the
centre. Seutellum dark. Elytra pale, sometimes. with
nebulous spots or darker lines (post mortem
changes?); the punctures are seattered irregularly
and very densely, sometimes suggesting longitudinal
series. Apices of elytra agiva), but often the elytra
are separated.
Underside dark, except antennae, palpi and most
of legs, and sometimes borders of prothorax and
abdomen, Labium without specula; postlabium flat,
granulate, Prosternum keel-shaped; mesosternum
keel-shaped on the hind 2/3, with an anterior tooth
on the keel. Hind margin of propygidium straight in
both sexes. Palpi. antennae and legs of the normal
pattern, Aedeagus (Fig. 2 c,d) ca. 1/47 of the body
length, the median lobe somewhat narrower than in
clarus, but slighty longer than the parameres.
THE GENERA LOCCORIUS ASD NOTHYDRLS IN AUST. AND NEW ZEALAND
The species is known [rom Victoria, New South
Wales and Queensland (Fig. 7). and seems to be
rarer than clarus. Victoria; Thurra River, Cape
Everard (2 ex., leg. A. Neboiss, 22.11,1970);
Deddick River, |) km above Snowy R. junction (10
ex., leg, A. Neboiss, 13.XIL. 1976); Thomson River,
L km upstream Cowwarr Wier (2 ex., leg. A.
Neboiss, 26,X.1973); Snowy-Deddick River junc-
tion (1 ex., leg. A, Neboiss, 14.11.1976); Snowy
River, 5 km below Deddick River junction (1 ex.,
leg. A. Neboiss, 14,X11,1976); Rainbow Ck.,
Cowwarr—Seaton Rd,, 18.11.1977, N.M.V, Survey
Dept., GRES (1 ex.), New South Wales: Tamworth
(type locality, 1 ex., leg. A.M. Lea); Jenolan Caves
(14 ex., leg. J. C, Wiburd 1864); Volumla (1 ex., leg.
J. Sedlacek, 1.1954); Tumut River (2 ex., leg. J.
Sedlacek. 1955). Queensland: Cairns (1 ex., leg. J.
Sedilacek 1951); N Queensland (3 ex., leg. T.
Blackburn):
Holotype: Institut R. Sciences Naturelles de
Belgique, Brussels; 3-5 x 1-75 mm; labels: Coll. R.1.
Sc. N.B, Australia 1864 Tamworth N.S.W. Ex Coll.
d’Orchymont/Coll, et det. dA. Orchymont;
Notoberosus marmoratus M. 2 R.M.H.N.B. 15.962/
Laccobius (Platylaccobius) decipiens n.sp. E. Gentili
det, 1976 / ¢ holotypus.
The Paratypes are those of the former list; they
are jn the following Natural History Museums:
South Australian Museum; National Museum of
Fig. 3—Aedeagus of Laceobius urrowi, Rotorua Co,, Waimangu
Stream, N, Island, New Zealand: A, frontal view, B, lateral view.
147
Victoria; California Academy of Sciences; Bishop
Museum, Honolulu; Museo di Verona; Museo di
Milano.
4. Laccobius (Platylaccobius) arrowi
dOrechymont, 1925
(Figs, 3 a, b; 7)
d@Orchymont, 1925; 1937, Winterbourn,
(mnineralis); 1973 (mineralis).
1970
Body length 2:3-3-5 mm; breadth 2-2-1-7 mm-
Oval, slightly convex, not much elongated (breadth
less than half of length).
Labium dark or metallic, alutaceous, punctured,
with fore margin straight, the hind curved. Head
also dark or metallic, alutaccous, with fine scattered
punctures; preocular patches pale and wide, as in
decipiens. Pronotum dark on disc, pale on sides, the
border of the colours uncertain; the dark spot is
normally wider than in decipiens. Anterior margin of
pronotum, between the lateral corners, almost
straight (in contrast to clarus and decipiens); the
surface alutaceous and punctured as on head.
Scutellum dark. Elytra pale, sometimes darkened by
post-mortem colour; the punctures are scattered,
rarer than in decipiens, darkened on disc, pale on
edges of elytra.
Underside dark, except palpi, antennae and most
of legs (femora are for the most part darkened),
Labium without specula; postlabium flat, with
scarcely visible punctures. Prosternum keel-shaped;
mesosternal keel with a tooth on fore end. Palpi.
antennae and legs of normal pattern. Aedeagus (Fig.
3 a, b) of body length, the median lobe shorter
than parameres and very complex,
The species is known from New Zealand (Fig. 7):
Otago, S Island (type locality, 10 ex., leg. Lewis
1901); Copland River, Welcome Flat, South
Westland, § Island (Winterbourn, 1973); Rotorua
Co,, Waimangu Stream, N Island (4 ex., leg. K, A.
J. Wise, 10.V.1971); Taupo, Waipuwerawera
Stream, N Island (type locality of mineralis; 2 ex.,
leg. M. Winterbourn VI.1966; efr. Winterbourn,
1970): Taupo, Waipahihi Stream, N Island (2 ex..
efr.. Winterbourn, 1970); Waiotapu (Winterbourn,
1973); N. Swale (1 ex., of the British Museum).
These specimens are in the British Museum,
Brussels Museum, Auckland Museum and Verona
Museum.
Holotype: British Museum; 2:75 x 1-5 mm; labels:
Holotype/type/Otago Lewis 1901/A. d’Orchymont
det. Laccobius s.str. arrowi d'Orchym./Sharp coll.
1905-313 (the anterior tarsi are all lost, but the
description is of a male),
(48
Paratypes: I know of two paratypes from the type
locality in the British Museum and in Brussels
Museum.
Laccobius mineralis Winterbourn, 1970 is in my
opinion the same species as arrawi. This opinion is
based on the observation of both the typical
specimens of arrowi and of ane specimen fram the
type locality of mineralis, determined by Wirter-
bourn and accompanied by 4 *‘mineralis” taken trom
the same area by K. A.J. Wise, as well as on the
description of mineralis, These aré the differential
characters proposed by Winterbourn (1970): (1) The
size: 2-3-2-4 mm for a@rrawi; 3-2-3-5 mm_ for
mineralis. But I obtained, on 4 beetles from 4
different stations, these measurements: 2°65 x 1-35;
2-75 x 1-45; 2:95 x 1:55 3:15 x 1:55 mm. They
evidently are a continuous series. (2) The anterior
angles of the pranotum are rounded in arrowi , and
the pronatum is deeply curved anteriorly, while in
mineralis the anterior angles are acute giving the
anterior margin a sinuous appearance. This is really
the same thing: the anterior angles are really
rounded, but observed from above they appear
acute; the sinuate appearance is due to the articulate
corners that make the fore margin deeply curved, (3)
The colour of the pronotum of arrawiis pale on the
borders, of mineralis completely brown. Winter-
bourn observed possibly a melanie specimen. (4)
The antennae are 8-segmented, not 6-segmented as
observed by Winterbourn. The Holotype of
mineralis is in the Auckland Institute and Museum.
New Zealand.
5. Laccobius (Microlaccobius) marmoratus (Mac-
leay. 1873)
(Figs. 4 a, b: 7)
Macleay, 1873 (Philhydrus); Zaitzey, 1908 (Enoc-
hrus): Knisch, 1924 (Enochrus); ctr. d’Orchymont.
1925
Body length 2-1-2-4 mm; breadth 1-1-1-3 mm-
Elongated, oval, nearly twice as long as its width.
Anterior margin of labium arcuate. Labium and
head dark, with a greenish metallic reflection:
preocular pale patches before eyes are half the
breadth of each eye. Surface (observed at 60 x)
shagreened, without punctures, Ratio between
breadth of eyes and of interposed space 1s ‘h,
Prenotum testaceous, with a dark metallic spot
which reaches posterior but not anterior margin; this
spot is narrower than space between eyes, and its
fore border is divided inta two parts, Surface
shagreened more conspicuously than head. and with
some impressed punctures on discal area. Scutellum
alutaceous like the head, with very fine punctures.
Elytra testaceaus, with some dark nebulosity on disc
and paler edges: the series of punctures alternately
more and less impressed.
REC; §, AUST, MUS I (7). 143-154
January, }981
Labium without specula, but with a border
attached to the postlahiuym tracing a triangle.
Postlabium flat, slightly wrinkled when observed at
60 x, Prosternum keel-shaped; mesosternal keel is
pyramidal and present only on hind part of the
mesosternum; glabrous metasternal line somewhat
excavated. Hind margin of propygidiunt deeply
excavated. Palpi, antennae and legs tesiaceous; the
legs are normally shaped, elongared. Aedcagus |); of
body length; ratio tegmen/parameéres Ys; structure
simple (fig. 4 a, b). the parameres scarcely longer
than median lobe.
Lectotype: CSIRO, Canberra; 2:2 x 1-1 mm
(elytra 145 mm); labels: Gayndsh/On permanent
loan from Macleay Museum, University of Sydney/
Laccobius marmoratus (Macleay) d Lectotypus EB.
Gentili 1975/syntype/Philhydrus marmoratus, Macl.,
Gayndah. Paratypes: The Australian Museum,
Sydney; labels; red circular label/719509/Philhydrus
marmoratus Me, L, W. Gayndah the Holotype/
1, Allolectotypus 2 2. Paratypus @ Laccobius
marmoratis Macleay, E, Gentili 1976.
The species ts Known only from the type locality.
Gayndab is a mountain town about 320 km north of
Brisbane, Queensland (Fig. 7).
6. Laccobius (Microlaccobius) matthewsi
(Figs. 4 c, d; 8)
Body length 1-6-2-5 mm) breadth 0-9-1-35 mm,
oval, moderately elongated, the length less than
Twice: the width.
Head and labium dark metallic, with two
yellowish preoecular spots before the Y-shaped
suture Or, sometimes, before the eyes; these spots of
same width as eyes or sometimes less. Surface
clearly alutaceous and weakly punctured. Anterior
border of labiurn regularly curved; distance between
eyes more than width of eyes. Pronotum testaceous,
with a dark or metallic central patch; the patch has
uncertain borders and is normally larger anteriorly,
reaching level of eyes, Surface shagreened like that
of head, but with stronger punctures. Scutellum dark
or metallic, micro-reticulated. Elytra testaceaus,
sometimes with a dark spot near centre of suture.
The serics of punctures aré clearly alternating
strangly impressed (primary), or Weakly (secon-
dary). Elytral apex rounded.
Underside dark; palpi, antennae and legs.
testaceous-yellowish, Labium without specula, the
hind margin straight (in contrast with mnarmoratus).
Prosternum keel-shaped; mesosternum with a keel
on posterior part, the keel having an anterior tooth;
propygidium posteriorly straight (another contrast
ta marmoratus). Acdeagus '/-'/ of body length;
parameres narrower than maprmeratus in frontal
view, and nor narrowing out in apical part in lateral
view (hig, 4 c, d).
nesp.
THE GENERA LOCCOBIUS AND NOTHYDRUS IN AUST. AND NEW ZEALAND 149
Fig. 4—A, B, Aedeagus of Laccobius marmoratus, lectotype,
Gayndah, Queensland: A, frontal view, B, lateral view; C, D,
Aedeagus of Laccobius matthewsi, holotype, Parachilna, Flinders
Range, South Australia: C, frontal view, D, lateral view,
This is one of the more common Laccobius of Tumut River (1 ex., leg. J. Sedlacek, 1955);
Australia (Fig. 8). Western Australia: Mullewa (1
ex., leg. Harvard Exp. Darlington, 2.1X.1931);
Carson Escarpment 14° 49’ S, 126° 49" E (2 ex., leg.
I.F.B. Common-M.S. Upton, 9-15. VIII.1975);
Langi Crossing, 10 m (5 ex., leg. E.S. Ross-D.Q.
Cavagnaro, 13.X.1962); Milly Milly, 300 m (1 ex,
leg. E. S. Ross-D, Q. Cavagnaro, 6.X.1962);
Northern Territory: Bessie Spring, 16° 40’ S, 135°
51' E, 8 km ESE of Cape Crawford (7 ex., leg. M.S.
Upton 26.X.1975); Nabarlek Dam, 12° 20' S, 133°
19‘ E,15 kmS by W of Nimbuwah Rock (1 ex,, leg.
E.G. Matthews, at light, 2.X1.1973); South
Australia: Parachilna, Flinders Range (1 ex., type
locality); Queensland: Coen, C. York (4 ex., leg.
Harvard Exp. Darlington, V. 1932); Crystal Creek,
23 mi. SSE of Ingham, 18° 58' 5” S, 146° 16’ E (7 ex.,
leg. Britton-Misko, at light, 9.XII,1968); Cairns
Distr. (2 ex., leg. A.M. Lea); New South Wales:
Moruya River, Araluen (9 ex., Jeg. E.B. Britton,
27.X11.1965); Manar Creek, Canberra Coast Road
(1 ex., leg. E.B. Britton-S. Misko, 18.V.1967);
Vicinity of Jenolan Caves (4 ex., leg. J. C. Wiburd);
Victoria; Thurra River, Cape Everard (1 ex., leg. A.
Neboiss, 22.111.1970); Deddick River, '2 km above
Snowy River junction (4 ex., leg. A. Neboiss,
13.XI1. 1976); Meredith (1 ex., leg. A. Neboiss, 12-
13.11,1959); Eppalock Res. Redesdale (1 ex., leg. A.
Neboiss, 27.X1. 1967).
Holotype: South Australian Museum, Adelaide;
2-3 x 1-25 mm; labels: Parachilna, Flinders Range /
Laccobius matthewsi n.sp, E. Gentili 1976 / ¢
Holotypus.
Paratypes: those of the preceding list; they are in
the following Museums: South Australian Museum;
National Museum of Victoria; CSIRO; Museum of
Comparative Zoology of the Harvard University;
California Academy of Sciences; Bishop Museum,
Honolulu; Museums of Verona and Milano, Italy.
7. Laccobius (Macrolaccobius) bicaudatus n.sp.
Body length 3-2 mm; breadth 1-5 mm; elongated,
more than twice as long as wide.
150 REC. S. AUST. MUS 18 (7): 143-154
Labium and head dark with metallic reflections;
two pale patches as wide as eyes, situated before the
latter; the whole surface shagreened, punctured, the
punctures thicker and stronger behind lateral
branches of Y-shaped suture. Fore margin of labium
regularly arcuate. Pronotum pale, testaceous, the
dark metallic spot oval, filling only central area of
disc without reaching borders, the surface shag-
reened and punctured like vertex. Fore margin
sinuous, with the median convexity equal to the
lateral ones (these are scarcely developed, less than
in other Laccobius). Elytra testaceous, hardly paler
on apex and sides; the punctures without dark rings,
the series not always conspicuous, more irregular on
the apical zone. Elytral apices divergent.
Under side dark, except hind abdominal seg-
ments, palpi, antennae, legs, and to a certain extent
the prosternum,. Postlabium flat, shagreened and
punctured; prosternum keel-shaped. The mesoster-
nal keel ends anteriorly in an arrow-point, scarcely
protruding. Hind border of fifth abdominal sternite
scarcely arched, almost straight. Palpi short;
Va
January, 1981]
antennae much longer, legs elongated, normally
shaped.
Holotype: Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii; it
comes from the Northern Territory and is the only
specimen known to me. Labels: Australia: N.T.,
Edith Ck., 2.XII.1963/J. Sedlacek Collector, Bishop
Museum / E. Gentili det. 1977, Laccobius bi-
caudatus n.sp. / ¢ holotypus.
8. Laccobius (Macrolaccobius) collium n.sp.
(Figs. 5 a, b; 8)
Body length 2-3-2-4 mm; breadth 1-2-1-25 mm:
oval, moderately elongated.
Dark, labium and head greenish-black, without
preocular patches, micropunctured at 60 x, particul-
arly in front of the Y-shaped suture; some larger
punctures behind this suture. Labium and head
large; fore margin of labium regularly arcuate; space
than eyes
between eyes broader as a whole.
THE GENERA LOCCOBIU'S AND NOTITYDRUS IN AUST
Pronotum pale on the sides. the central patch
greenish-black with uncertain borders, of the same
widih as space between eyes, hardly reaching fore
and hind borders of pronotum at middle. Fore
margin convex in middle; the hind also, but very
little, on the scutellum, The whole surface smooth at
60 x, scarcely punctured. Scutellum dark. with
metallic reflexes, sometimes finely punctured.
Elyira testaceous, with some uncertain dark patches
(one near middle of suture; another near base of
elytron; a third between the others, but slightly
external), Punctures darkened (except on sides and
upex); the series are formed by punctures different
in size, and alternately more and less regular,
Sutural angle of each elytron acute, approximate to
the other elytron,
Underside dark, the abdomen sometimes lighter;
palpi, antennae and legs testaceous. Labium withour
specula: postlabium flat or lightly undulated, with
some impressed punctures, near the borders lightly
wrinkled. Prosternum keel-shaped; mesosternum
with a tubercle on posterior half; abdomen and legs
normally shaped, the claws nearly straight. Acdea-
gus \) OF body length; parameres appear to merge
with euch other; median lobe very complex
(Pig. S a, b).
The typical seric¢s comes from the Northern
Territory (Fig. 8). Holotype: CSIRO, Canberra; 23
x [-2 mm; labels: Australia, 12° 31° S, 132° 54° E,9
km N by E of Mudginbarry Hs., N.T., 10.V1.1973,
Upton-Feehan/E. Gentili det. 1976. Laccabius
collum wsp.d Holotypus. Allotype and 4 Para-
types labelled in the same way; they are in the
CSIRO and Verona Museums’ Collections.
9 Laveobius (Macrolaccobius) britton) nesp.
(Figs. 5 c, dy 7)
Body length 2-2-2-4 mm); breadth I:}-1:3 mm.
Closely similar to collin: the chief difference is in
the wedeagus, which is smaller, narrower, and with a
simpler inedian lobe (Mig. 5 ¢, d): the ratio
aedeagus/body length is about |\\. Externally, the
sole difference appreciuble is # greater convexity and
a denser punctuation on the pronotum,
The species comes from Northern Australia
(Fig. 7); Northern Territory; Bessie Springs, 16° 40"
S$. 135° STE. 8 km BSE of Cape Crawford (type
locality, 4 ex.. leg. M. 8. Upton 26.X,1975);
Nabarlek Dam, 12° 20' 8, 133° 19 FE, 15 km S$ by
Nimbuwah Rock {1 ex., leg. B. G. Matthews;
2.V1,1973); Queensland: Mary Creek, 16 33° S,
145° 12° FE (2 ex., leg. Britlton-Misko. al light.
4.X17,1968),
Holotype: CSIRQ, Canberra; 2-2 x L-l mm;
labels: Australia, 16° 40° S, 135" 51° E. Bessie
AND NEW 7FALAND 15|
Spring, 8 km ESE of Cape Crawford. 26.%.1975, M,
S. Lipton, N.T/E. Gentili det, 1976. Laccohius
brittont o.sp./% Holotypus,
Paratypes: the above list; they are in the CSIRO
and Verona Museums Collections,
THE BLACKBURN “LACCOBIUS” (NOTHYD-
RUS BALF.-BR,, 1939, EMENDED)
Blackburn (1891) described two ‘“Laccobius”,
montanus and australis, affirming that they “may be
attributed to this genus... although they differ from
the European members of ttin having --. characters
... that may justify a new generic name”. Ln effect,
after the study of the typical females in the British
Museum collechons, Balfour-Browne (1939) pro-
posed for these insects the new generic name
“Norohydrus", emended by d'Orchymont (1942) to
Nothydrus. 1 agree with these coleopterists; the
differences [rom the nearer genera are in my opinion
great cnough to separate Norhydrus as an mdepen-
dent genus,
Nothydrus has chiefly the following characters.
Labiium shorter than in Laeceobius, widely excavated
anteriorly; prefrons flat, long, with a straight lore
margin{ upper surface of the head punctured.
Postlabium plate-sshaped. Antennae &-segmented
(5 | 3). the fifth article nearly cupuliform, like the
Cereyonini, maxillary palpi robust, nearly as long as
the antennae, the fourth article longer than the
third, The fore margin of the pronotum is widely
excavated for the reception of the head, the corners
widely rounded, the surface punctured, The
prosternum is lacking a keel. The fore femora are
pubescent on the whole under surface, glabrous only
near the apices; the fore tarsi do not show any sexual
dimorphism, Secutellum nearly equilateral, Elytra
with parasutural suleron /) of their length, these sulci
continuing anteriorly by meaus of some large
punetures; the elytral punctures are scattered, but
showing about ten series of larger punctures, more
conspicuous and engraved on the hind surface; as in
Laeccobius, the epipleura are anteriorly large, and
reduced on the posterior half of the eclytron. The
mMesosternum is tuberculate, not sharply curinute.
The mid femora ure pubescent like the fore. The
wWiitgs are present, provided with a cantharidiform
nervation. The metasternum is pubescent, slightly
elevated in the middle. The hind trochanters are
small, not separated at their upices from the femora;
these are almost entirely pubescent, save at the
apices and sometimes the hind margin; the hind
libiae wre straight; the fifth metatarsal segment is
shorter than the four basal segments taken together.
Five abdominal segments are visible, the sixth at rest
is internal. The male sexual organs are similar to
those of Ayaceaena in their general pattern,
152 REC, $8. AUST, MUS Ik (7)
The genus differs from Laccobius in having five
abdominal segments, a prosternum without a keel,
small hind trochanters not separated from the
femora, pubescent femora, sexual dimorphism
absent on fore tarsi, and a sutural stria on the elytra,
From Paracymus, it differs in having the prosternum
without any keel and the mesosternum without an
arrow-head shaped keel, It differs from Anacaena in
having an elongated and depressed body form, a
deeply excavated lablum, conspicuous elytral series,
and a cupuliform fifth antennal article. In contrast to
Balfour-Browne (1939), who suggested an affinity
with Laccohius, placing the genus Norhydrus at the
end of the subtribe Hydrobiae, d’'Orchymont (1942)
suggested an affinity with Anacaena. The pattern af
the aedeagus (basis of the tegmen pointed; aedeagus
flat, with 4 simple trilobate structure) confirms his
opinion.
Nothydrus australis (Blackburn, 1891)
(Fig. 6 a)
Blackburn, 1891 (Laccubius); Knisch, 1924
(Laccobius); Balfour-Browne, 1939 (Notuhydrus);
d'Orehymont, 1942.
Body length 2:9-3-5 mm, breadth |:5-1-8 mm;
oval elongated, less than twice as long as its width.
Fig, 6—A, Aedeagus of Nothydrus australis, Dondangadale,
Victoria: frontal view; B, Aédeagus of Nothydrus sientanus,
Erica, Victoria: frontal view.
The beetle has the characters of the genus. It is
enough to record here the differences from
montanus. The dorsal colour is pale, testaceous,
143-1454 Junuary, 198l
only the discs of the head and of the pronotum being
dark, The puncturation of the head and pronotum is
finer and sparser than that of the elytra, while on the
elytra the puncturation of the series is quite notably
distinct from that of the general surface, ‘The sides of
the pronotum are not transparent. The greatest
width is at the level of the middle of the elytra. The
plate of the postlabium (flat, smooth, without
punctures) and the sides of the abdomen are
yellowish, the remainder of the under surface is
dark, The hind femora are pubescent near the fore
margin. Aedeagus nearly '/s of the body length,
tegmen longer than parameres; these are narrow and
sharp al their apices like the median lobe (fig. 6 a).
Australia, Victoria; Ovens River (type locality,
Blackburn, 1891); Bogong Village (1 ex., leg.
A, Neboiss, 23,1.1960); Upper Nariel (6 ex. leg,
A. Neboiss, 29.1,1957); Dondangadale (2 ex., leg.
A. Neboiss, 11.1.1955); Marwall River (3 ex., leg
§. Trout, XII.1945); Sth. Neerim (1 ex., leg. PF. E.
Wilson 11.1,1941, det. A. d’Orchymont). These
specimens are jn the National Museum of Victoria,
Melbourne, and in the Museum of Verona, Italy,
Holotype: British Museum; 3:0 * 1:5 mm; labels:
T 3564 Al / Holotype / Australia, Blackburn Coll.,
B. M. 1910-236 / Laecobius australis Blackb. /
Laccobius australis Blkb., M. BE. Bacchus det, 1977,
Holotype / Nathydrus australis Blackb., E. Gentih
det, 1977,
Nothydrus montanus (Blackburn, 1891)
(Fig. 6 b)
Blackburn, 1891 (Laccobius); Knisch, 1924
(Laccobius); Balfour-Browne, 1939 (Notohydrus):
d’Orchymont, 1942.
Body length 3-5-4:5 mm; breadth 1-9-2-3. mm;
Jarger than australis but like tt in shape,
The chief differences from australis are the
following. Dorsal colour darker, blackish-brown,
more shining; apart from the preocular patches, only
the sides of the pronotum are clear and transparent,
The upper puncturation is the same on the head,
pronotum and elytra, consisting of finer and sharper
punctures than in australis, and it includes the
punctures of the series, confusing the latter with
those of the interseries. The greatest width js at the
level of the base of the clytra. The plate of the
postlabium (flat, without punctures, but slightly
alutaceous) is pale, the remaining underside is dark.
Hind femora pubescent at the bases, Aedeagus
neatly \ of body length; tegmen long like the
parameres, these larger than in australis, with
rounded apices; the median lobe very wide at the
base (Fig. 6 b)
Australia, Victoria! Victorian Mountains (type
THE GENERA LOCCOBIUS AND NOTHYDRUS IN AUST, AND NEW ZEALAND 153
locality, Blackburn, 1891); Bogong, High Plain (1
ex., leg. A. Neboiss, 26.1.1960); Erica (4 ex., leg. A.
Neboiss, 29.1.1960); Millgrove (1 ex., leg. A.
Neboiss, 26.11.1958); Cumberland Falls (1 ex.. leg.
A. Neboiss, 16.11.1958); Black’s Spur (2 ex., leg. C.
Oke, 1.1934); Fern Tree Gully (1 ex., leg. C. Oke);
New South Wales: Kosciusko (2 ex., leg. H. G.
Carter). The specimens of this list are in the
National Museum of Victoria, Melbourne, in the
South Australian Museum, Adelaide, and in the
Museum of Verona, Italy.
Holotype: British Museum; 3-6 x 1-85 mm;
labels: Holotype / T 3563 Al. / Australia, Blackburn
Coll., B. M. 1910-236 / Laccobius montanus Blackb.
/ Laccobius montanus Blkb., M. E. Bacchus det.
1977 Holotype / Nothydrus montanus Blackb. E.
Gentili det. 1977.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am indebted to the following colleagues and
institutions for their generous assistance:
Dr. E. G. Matthews, South Australian
Museum, Adelaide (Loan of material and
revision of the manuscript).
Mr. M. E. Bacchus, and Mr. P. M. Hammond,
British Museum, London.
Dr. A. Bons, and Dr. H. Perrin, Muséum
National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris,
Dr. E. B. Britton, CSIRO, Canberra.
Dr. A. A. Calder, National Museum of
Victoria, Melbourne.
Mr. E. C. Dahms, The Queensland Museum,
Fortitude Valley.
Dr. R. Damoiseau, Institut R. des Sciences
Naturelles de Belgique, Bruxelles.
iI
ar
* zietzi
e decipiens
= arrowi
© marmoratus
a brittoni
| —
Na 120 130 140
—J
150 160 170 180
Fig. 7—Geographical distribution of Laccobius zietzi, decipiens,
arrowi, marmoratus, and brittoni.
REC. S. AUST. MUS 18 (7): 143-154
January, 1981
clarus
matthewsi
collium
100”t”~été“‘C;‘SCO.O!OWOWOWOWOWOOOOO#COWSO
140 150 140
Fig. 8—Geographical distribution of Laccobius clarus, matthewsi,
and callium,
Mr. G. A. Holloway, The Australian Museum,
Sydney.
Dr. D. H. Kavanaugh, California Academy of
Sciences, San Francisco.
Dr. J. Krikken, Rijksmuseum van Naturlijke
Historie, Leiden,
Dr. M. Pearce, Museum of Comparative
Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge,
Mass.
Dr. G. A. Samuelson, Bernice P. Bishop
Museum, Honolulu.
Dr, M. Winterbourn, University of Canterbury,
Christchurch.
Dr. K. A. J. Wise, Auckland Institute and
Museum, Auckland.
Special thanks also to Mr. A. Bertocchi, who
prepared the drawings.
REFERENCES
BALFOUR-BROWNE, J. 1939. Contribution to the study of the
Palpicornia, If. Ent. Month. Mag. 75: 5-6.
BLACKBURN, T, 1891. Further notes on Australian Coleop-
tera, with descriptions of new Genera and Species. Trans. R.
Soc. S. Austr. 14, (1): 67-68,
1895. Further notes on Australian Coleoptera, with
descriptions of new Genera and Species. Trans. R. Soc. S,
Austr. 19 (1): 20-73,
BRITTON, E. B. 1970. Coleoptera (Beetles) In; Waterhouse D.
F. et al. ‘The Insects of Australia” (Melbourne University
Press, Melbourne).
GANGLBAUER, L. 1904, Die Kifer von Mitteleuropa’’. TV,
251, note. (Goecke & Evers. Krefeld).
GENTILI, E, 1974, Descrizione di nuove entité appartenenti al
genere Laccobius Erichson, 1837 e proposta per un nuovo
inquadramento sottogenerico. Mem. Mus. Civ, Sr, Nat.
Verona 20 (1972): 549-550, 1 fig.
GENTILI, B., and CHIESA, A. 1975, Revisione dei Laccohius
palearetici. Mem. Soc. Ent. It. 54: 6-22.
KNISCH, A, 1924. Hydrophilidae. In: Junk, W., Coleopterorum
Catalogus: 181-192 (W. Junk, Berlin).
MACLEAY, W. 1873. Notes on a collection of Insects from
Gayndah. Trans. Ent. Soc. N.S. Wales 2: 130-131.
ORCHYMONT, A. d’. 1925, Contribution a l'étude des
Hydrophilides, 1. Bull. Ann, Soc, Ent. Belg. 65: 66-70.
ORCHYMONT, A. d’. 1937, Check list of the Palpicornia of
Oceaniu, Occas. Papers Bern, P. Bishop Mus. Honolulu 13:
13, 153.
ORCHYMONT, A. d’. 1942. Contribution a l’étude de la tribu
Hydrohiini Bedel. Mem. Mus, R. Hist. Nat. Belg. I, 24: 3-
10, 39.
ORCHYMONT, A. d°. 1948. Report on the Palpicornia, Mr.
Omer-Cooper’s Investigation of the Abyssinian Fresh Waters
(Hugh Scott Expedition). Proc. Zool. Sec, Landon 117: 727-
728.
WINTERBOURN, M. J. 1970. The Hydrophilidae of New
Zealand's Thermal Waters. Trans. R, Sec. New Zealand 12:
21-28, 11 figs.
WINTERBOURN. M. J. 1973. The larva of Anacaena tepida
from a Rotorua Hot Spring. New “ealand Ent. 5: 171-174. |
fig.
WISE, K, A. 1973. A list and Bibliography of the aquatic and
water-associated insects of New Zealand. Rec. Auckland
Inst, Mus, 10: 156.
ZAITZEV, P. 1908. Catalogue des Coléoptéres aquatiques des
familles des Dryopidae, Georyssidae, Cyathoceridae,
Heteroceridae et Hydrophilidae. Horae Soc, Ent, Rassicae
38: 391-395,
THE FABRICAN TYPES OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND
COLEOPTERA IN THE BANKS COLLECTION AT THE BRITISH
MUSEUM (NATURAL HISTORY)
BY WINIFRED P. K. RADFORD
Summary
The Banks Collection is a collection of Fabrician types housed in the British Museum (Natural
History). It was presented to the British Museum in 1863 by the Linnean Society. In this paper the
Australian and New Zealand Coleoptera are classified as far as possible according to their present
status. This classification includes nine new synonyms and eighteen species omitted from recent
catalogues. In the discussion of the species they are recorded alphabetically. The original Fabrician
reference and the 1801 reference are given, together with the Junk Coleopterorum Catalogus
reference where applicable, and the Zimsen reference. As far as possible known synonyms of the
species are listed. The labels and condition of the types are given and in some cases comments are
made as to identification and locality. Sometimes it has been found that the Fabrician locality is
incorrect. There is rarely a locality label on the specimen — but is only given in the original
description. In the cramped ocnditions on the H.M.S. Endeavour there must have been some mixing
of material.
THE FARRICIAN TYPES OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND COLEOPTERA
IN THE BANKS COLLECTION AT THE BRITISH MUSEUM (NATURAL HISTORY)
by WINIFRED P. kK. RADFORD
la Cheviot Avenue, Lower Mitcham, South Australia 5062
ABSTRACT
RADFORD, WINIFRED P. K. 1980, The Fabrictan types of the
Australian and New Zealand Coleoptera in the Banks
Collection at the British Museum (Natural History), Rec. §
Aust. Mus. 18 (8); 155-197,
The Banks Collection is a collection of Fabrician
types housed in the British Museum (Natural
History), It was presented to the British Museum in
1863 by the Linnean Society. In this paper the
Australian and New Zealand Coleoptera are
classified as far as possible according to their present
status. This classification includes nine new
synonyms and eighteen species omitted trom recent
catalogues. In the discussion of the species they are
recorded alphabetically. The original Fabrician
reference and the 1801 reference are given, together
with the Junk Coleopterorum Catalogus reference
where applicable, and the Zimsen reference. As far
as possible known synonyms of the species are listed.
The labels and condition of the types are given and
in some cases comments are made as to identifica-
tion and locality. Sametimes it has been found that
the Fabrician locality is incorrect. There is rarely a
locality label on the specimen—but is only given in
the original description. In the cramped conditions
on the H.M.S. Endeavour there must have been
some mixing af material.
INTRODUCTION
In 1928 Dr. R. J. Tillyard, who was the chief of the
Division of Entomology in the then recently created
Australian Council of Seience and Indusirial
Research, suggested that while J] was studying in
London ] should examine the Australian and New
Zealand species of Coleoptera in the Banks
Collection located in the British Museum. This [ did
and received much help from G. J. Arrow, and K.
G. Blair of the Museum and G, E. Bryant of the
Entomological Bureau, On my return to Australia,
late in 1929, 1 was fully occupied in establishing the
Coleoptera Collection of the C.S.1.R. in Canberra.
My manuscript on the Banks Collection was laid
aside and only came to light again in 1976.
In the meantime specialists in various groups have
studied some of the species, tracing out their present
status and in some cases their synonymy. These are,
as far as IT have been able to ascertain, H. J. Carter
(1926, 1929, 1930) on Austrahan Tenebrionidae,
Buprestidae, and Alleculidae; P. Lepesme (1939) on
Dermestidac; HL E. Hinton (1945) on Dermestidae;
G. Ochs (1949) on Australian Gyrinidae; P. B.
Carne (1957) on Australian Dynastinae: G. Kuschel
(1969, 1970) on New Zealand Curculionoidea; E.G.
Matthews (1972, 1974) on Australian Scarabaeinac,
Y¥. Lobl (1976) on Australian species of Scaphidium.
The purpose of this paper is to present a list of the
Fabrician Types. of the Coleoptera in the Banks
Collection im the British Museum (Natural
Museum), for which Fabricius recorded the localities
as ‘'nova Hollandia”, “nova Zelandia’, and ‘terra
Diemenii”. A systematic list has been drawn up and
the species classified, as far as possible, into families,
sub-families, and their present generic status, It has
been found that some species have been omitted
from recent catalogues, This may be due to the very
brief and inadequate Original descriptions, which are
often no more than twa lines, together with the
“habitat” for the locality giving only the name of the
country, €.g., “nova Hollandia’ and not mentioning
any particular regian, Sometimes the name of a
collector or a collection is given, e.y,, “Mus.Dam.
Banks”, or just “Dom.Banks’~ Tn some instances a
camparison with a selated species is given or,
especially in his later publications, a fuller
description is added.
Fabricius at first only separated the insects he
studied into the large groups or orders as we now
know them. Then, on the characters of the mouth
parts, he classified them into genera only, not into
families and sub-families although he did put them
into groups according to the antennal structure. As
he studied more and more specimens he realised his
initial genera contained many species. which could be
better classified inta smaller graups and so added
more and more genera. Thus we find in his later
publications the original generic name of the species
was sometimes changed.
E. Zimsen (1964) published a book on ''The Type
Material of J, C, Fabricius". In this work she states
where the specimens on Which Fabricius based his
descriptions are to be found. Fabricius did not label
any particular specimen as a type and sometimes his
descriptions were made from more than one
specimen. S. L. Tuxén (1967: p. 8), who worked
closely with Ella Zimsen, explains that trom the
references given by Fabricius in his original
descriptions she “‘inferred, though it is nowhere
stated explicitly in his books" that where the name
of a collector or a collection is given that is where the
“type specimen or specimens” are to be found, and
where no such reference is given the type specimen
is in his own collection, now housed in the
Zoological Museum at Copenhagen, Tuxén adds,
“Her work. based on this axiom. showed this to be
the case ., . There may be reasons of labelling for
this difficulty (choosing the type), but there is also
156
another reason which Fabricius himself mentions in
1803 (Tuxén 1967; pp, 9-10), In later years Fabricius
himself got so confused in describing so many
species (Zimsen lists 9 776), that he sometimes put
one insect in two different genera or used the same
name for different species. Tuxén quotes Fab-
ricius:—""In my youth this did not easily happen, my
memory was beiter and my eye sharper, now both
are weaker...” It is understandable that in dealing
with so many Specimens mistakes occurred. Where
there is only one known specimen then it can be
taken as the holotype, but where there is more than
one specimen later workers have sometimes selected
a specimen as the lectotype and the others in the
senes are known as paralectotypes. Where no such
study has been made the series are known as
syntypes. In the late 19th century C, O, Waterhouse
studied the Fubricius material in the Banks
Collection and put type labels on those specimens
which he was reasonably able ta ascertain were the
specimens ta Which Fabricius’s description referred.
Where the species is represented in the collection by
only one specimen lt have called it the holotype as
Fabricius’s reference states in “Mus, Dom. Banks",
If there are two specimens | have called them
syntypes according to the present day nomenclature,
If one of these has a museum type-label an it, in the
comments | have referred to that specimen as “type”
as future workers may designate them as hoilo-,.
lecto- or syntypes. Where there was more than one
specimen of a species the owner of the collection
often gave Fabricius specimens for his own
collection, Thus some “type material” occurs in
more than one place. The references for the
synonyms of each species are not given in the
bibliography,
This paper brings to light 18 Fabricius species
which have been overlooked of omitted from recent
catalogues, records nine new synonyms, and gives a
modern classification for the Australian and New
Zealand species in the Banks Collection.
JOHANN CHRISTIAN FABRICIUS
Johann Christian Fabricius was born act Tender in
Denmark in 1745. He was fortunate that he was able
to travel throughout Europe and England, where he
had access to many museums and private collections,
London became his second home. At the British
Museum he met Dr. C. Solander who, like himself.
had studied under Linnaeus at Uppsala. When
Solander and Banks sailed on H.M.S, Endeavour,
Fabricius returned to Copenhagen where he had
been appointed a professor at the Charlotlenberg
Naturalickabenet. In 1771 TLM.S. Endeavour
returned to England. From 1772-1775 Fabricius
divided his time between Copenhagen and London,
continuing his studies of the insects in the collections
RECS ALIST. MUS, 18 (8), 455-107
January, [98]
of Hunter, Drury and Banks—the latter now
included the insects brought back tram the voyage
an the Endeavour. In 1775 his Systema
Entomologiae was published. which cansisted
mainly of descriptions of inseets he collected in
England, or of insects he had studied in the English
collections. He stated of this publication, 'Entamol-
opy was at that time in its infancy’. Up till then the
only classification known was that of Linnaeus, who
had based his classification on the wings of insects
Which was not satisfactory as Linnaeus himself
realised. Also Linnaeus did not have sufficient
specimens fo make an entirely satisfactory classifica-
tion, Fabricius used the mouth parts as a basis for
classification. He was aware of its limitations bur
considered his classes were “more natural and my
species were more numerous and more ably defined
and the number of described genera considerably
greater” Fabricius had now become the entomolog-
ical authority of the day, and in his classifications
introduced the coneise language of the Linnaean
“school” into this compartment of Natural History.
He continued ta travel in Europe and in England
where he spent the summers of 1780-81 and again in
1787 (Tuxén 1967: p. 3). During these travels he had
access tt) many museums and private collections. He
published many systematic warks on insects and in
the later part of his life published monographs of the
larger orders of insects, He died in 1808.
SIR JOSEPH BANKS
Joseph Banks was born in 1743 into a wealthy
family. He was educated at Harrow. Eton and
Oxford where Botany was one of his chief studies-
Although Botany was his life interest he had an
extensive knowledge of all the Natural Sciences, His
house at 32 Soho Square was open to all who wished
to study his colleetians aud work in his library. His
wealth enabled him to undertake and finance three
voyages. The first in 1766 to Newfoundland and
Labrador, the second an the Endeavour from 1768-
1771, and the third to Iceland and Staffa, It was due
to the Royal Society that he obtained permission for
himself and a staff of seven, including Dr. C.
Solander of the British Museum. to accompany
Lieutenant (jater Captain) Cook on the Endeavour,
He was fully aware of the task he was undertaking to
make collections. of Natural History specimens,
which would be mostly new to Science, on the long
voyage ahead of him. His preparations were
thorough, John Ellis F.R.S. in a letter to Linnaeus
gives us the only known account of these
preparatians:— “No people went to sea better fitted
out for the purpose of Natural History. They had got
a fine library of Natural History; they have all sorts
of machines for catching and preserving insects, all
kinds of nets, trawls, drags and hooks for coral
fishing; they even have a curious contrivance of a
THE FABRICIAN TYPES OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND COLEOPTERA 157
telescope. by which, put into water, you can see the
hotiom at a preat depth where it is clear. They have
many cases of bottles with ground glass stoppers, of
several sizes to preserve animals in spiric. They have
several sorts of salts ta surround the seeds. and wax
both beewax and that of Myrica, Besides there are
many people whose sole business is to attend them
for this very purpose”, He was a true scientist in that
he was a keen observer and a careful recorder, All
specimens collected were recorded and preserved.
He was also a keen student of the ethnic races that
they encountered. Banks made friends easily and
throughout the three years voyage there was no
friction with Cook and the crew.
The voyage of the Endeavour enabled the
scientists ta collect at Madeira, Rio de Janeiro, in
the region of Cape Horn, Tahiti, round the coast of
New Zealand, where Cook discovered it to be twa
islands. not one; alang the east eoast of Australia
landing for short periods at Botany Bay, Bustard
Bay, Thirsty Bay, then for two months at Cooktown
while the ship had to be repaired after running on ta
a reef; then sailing round Cape York, proving New
Guinea to be a separate island, stopping briefly on
the west of New Guinea at Cook's Bay; then on ta
Suva and Batavia, and home round the Cape of
Good Hope with a stop at St. Helena.
The voyage was primarily undertaken to observe
the transit of Venus across the sun at Tahiti. This
was nol successful as the instruments af those days
did not make it possible to fake accurate
observanions. However, the work of Burks and his
staff, the collections and observations of Natural
History and of the ethnie races they encountered,
were of inestimable value, After this, scientists were
always part of the personnel of the British voyages of
discovery. Banks himself did nol publish uny papers,
He did keep and file all his correspondence which
showed how wide his interests were. In 1779 he was
asked to give evidence before a commiltee of the
House of Commons concerning the suitability of
Botany Bay as a convict settlement, Nothing was
done till 1786 when the over-crawding of the prisans
made the matter urgent. and on Banks’ advice plans
were made and the new colony was established
shortly afterwards. For some time the governors of
the colony wrote to Banks for help and advice and
he acted as a go-between for the Goyernment and
the calony. Banks was by then scientific adviser te
the Royal Gardens at Kew and his work there made
the Gardens a centre for botanical research into
plants of all the colonies of the Crown, which he
foresaw would be necessary for their development.
Today the Gardens are still a centre for botanical
research.
Unfortunately Sir Joseph Banks ended his life as
an invalid and a cripple, but to the end, his interest
in all around him never flagged. His papers were left
to his wife's nephew, and at his death were to go to
the British Museum, Through misunderstanding as
to the final destination and ownership, the papers
were sold at auction, many were lost or destroyed
and those remaining were distributed all aver the
warld. Foriunately for Australia many of the papers
relating to Australia, including the original copy af
the Journal of the Voyage of the Endeavour, were
procured and are now in the Mitchell Library, Apart
from his papers. his library and collections were left
to the botanist, Reahert Brown. Later via the
Linnaean Society they were removed to the British
Museum which ensured their preservation.
THE BANKS COLLECTION OF AUSTRALIA
AND NEW ZEALAND CGLEOPTERA
In a report by C. O. Waterhouse (1906: p. 580) he
states that the Banks Collection “was received in the
original Banksian cabinet , . . the specimens are,
however, kept in the arder of Fabricius’ Systema
Entomolagiae.” This is the 1775 publication. Many
species in the collection were described after this
date. Waterhouse adds, “Some of the species
mentioned by Fabricius as being in this collection
were not in it When it was received by the Museum,”
Recently (1979) some Banks material has been
found in the Hunterian Collection in Glasgow, Jn
correspondence with Dr. H. Brock of the University
of Glasgow she writes; “There are in all over 100
specimens in the Hunterian Collection that must
have come from the Cook voyages.’ I agree with her
that Fabricius when working on both the Banks and
Hunter Collections ‘enabled Hunter to acquire
Banks duplicates." Banks was a generous man both
with his money and possessions and shared them
with others. Fabricius certainly added specimens
fram the collections he studied to his awn collectian,
Now two of the six missing ‘types’ from the Banks
Collection, namely Dennestes navalis and Lampyris
australis are found to he in the Hunterian
Collection, As he worked with so many specimens it
is very probable that some specimens were put back
in the wrong collection. The Banks Collection
contains over 3.000 insects in all. The Systema
Eleutheratorum is Fabricius’s record of the Coleopt-
era he described.
The Banks Collecuon of Coleoptera is naw
arranged in the order given by Fabricius in the
Systema Eleutheratorum. 1801, except for one
specimen which was omitted from the
Eleutherstorum, and was found by EB, 4imsen
(1964) among the unnamed specimens. It was then
added at the end of the named specimens im the
collection,
[58 REC, & AUST
Where they exist, the references given for cach
species are;—
1. The original reference,
2, The Systema Eleutheratorum.
3. Junk’s Coleepterorum Catalogs
4. The reference in “The Type Material af J-C.
Fabricius” by E. Zimsen.
5. The reference of a recent reviser al the
group,
The species with the original ceference in Systema
Entomologiae, 1775, and four Curculionaidea from
New Zealand with the original reference in the
Species Insectorum, 1781, were collected during the
voyage of the Endeavonr. G, Kuschel (1920: p. 192)
states that “the more Spectacular weevils’ were
described first in 1775 and “the remamder™ were
described later, The species with the original
reference in the Manitissa Insectorum, L787. were
collected by D. Nelson, who was sent by Banks on
Captain Cook’s third voyage on H-M.S-. Discovery.
After the return of H.M.S. Endeavour many more
voyages of discovery were made. Banks himself anly
made one more voyage after his return and that was
to Iceland and the Shetland Islands, However, when
opportunity offered, he sent aut men at his own
expense or from the Royal Gardens ut Kew to
collect for him and for the Gardens (Maiden 1909: p.
124). David Nelson was one of these collectors.
In this paper 131 Fabrician specific names are
listed, ten of these are synonyms as Fabricius
renamed those species in his later publications for
one reason or another. Of the remaining 121;—
i. Seventy-nine species are recorded by Fab-
ricius from “‘nova Hollandia’. The localiry
of seven of these were erroneously
recorded, three are probably from the East
Indies, and four from New Zealand. As G.
Kuschel (1970: p. 191) points out, there
must have been some mixing of matenal on
H.M.S, Endeavour.
. Thitty-two species are listed fram “nova
Zelandia™. Of these, the locality of ane is
doubtful, and one erroneously recorded
from “Brasilia’’ has been included (Kus-
chel 1970: p, 199).
i, Hight species are recorded from “‘terra
Diemenit’ one of which is labelled
Kerguelen.
iv, Two are recorded as being from both ‘‘nova
Hollandia et Zelandia”’,
wot
=
i
In each case an exact copy of the Fabrician label,
which is in his own handwriting, has been given,
Sometimes the label is no more than a scrap of
paper, but according to Zimsen (1964: p, 10)
Fabricius in is own collection used “a small secap of
paper oo which was written the name of the species.
MUS 18 (Ry: 155.197
January, Fost
never mention of the genus’, In the Banks
Collection, however, the genus is usually given, but
very rarely the localily or name of a collectar. The
Fabrician labels in this Collection are usually writren
in two lines, the upper one giving the name and the
lower one the reference, In some cases the reference
1s the number only of the species in the genus being
described, with no page reference, This would
indicate that the label was attached when the species
was described and before publication; where (he
pageé also is given would denote that the label was
added after publication, In the introduction of both
his publications, Species Insectorum, 1781, and
Mantissa lnsectorum, 1787, it is stated that these
works contain dese¢riptians of species studied in
“Angha™ (England), These descriptions were not
only of wew species but also fuller descriptions of
some species alrgady described in the Systema
Entamoelogiae, 1775. When compiling his Species
Insectorum, 1781, he says ‘My system of Insects
gained ground considerably, as well by the more
exact definition of the species, as by the addition of a
considerable number of geners.’” In doing so
Fabricius must have changed the labels on some of
the species he redeseribed, so we find references toa
later publication instead of the original one, and
sometimes a change of the generic name. As nore
and more specimens were examined he realised his
classification required further divisions, Therefore,
sometimes the BMNH Jabel has a different genus to
the original one, in fact the genus for the species as
given in Systema Eleutheratorum, Itis probable that
the BMWNH label was written when the collection
was arranged acearding to the order in that
publication, A few specimens also haye a BMNH
register number 63-46 on a small blue dise, The
Museum name-labels are not attached to the
specimen but are pinned below it, except for C. OQ.
Waterhouse's type-lahels, Kuschel (1970) did not
add any holotype or lectotype labels when he studied
the New Zealand Curculionoidea in the collection.
The specimens are usually pinned through the right
elytron and in most cases the pin has been glued on
the ventral surface, often obliterating the structures.
In the discussion of the species they are listed in
alphabetical order avcording to the specific name.
Known synonyms are listed, The numerous varieties
of the chrysomelids are not listed as [ beheve that
there is much work to be done on the separation of
these varieties, ‘The localities given are those
published by Fabricius, but corrections to these
localities have sometimes had to be made.
The following list of places visited by Cook around
the coasts of New Zealand and Australia will give
some indication Where the type specimens were
collected, A, Musgrave (1954; p. 232-7) points aut
that when the Endeavour was sailing up the coast of
THE FABRICIAN TYPES OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND COLEOPTERA
Australia it was late in the season for collecting
insects at Botany Bay, so probably most of the
insects from Australia would have been collected at
Endeavour River (Cooktown), However, Banks’
journal does record that collecting was done at both
Bustard and Thirsty Bays,
Round the coast of New Zealand:—
1769 9-10 October at Poverty Bay
20 October at Anaura Bay
23-29 October at Tolaga Bay
4-15 November at Mercury Bay
20 November at Waihou (Thames) River
29 November- 5 December at Bay of
Islands
16 January- 6 February at Ship Cove,
Queen Charlotte Sound
27-30 March at D’Urville Tsland
31 March left New Zealand waters and
sailed to Australia
27 April- 6 May at Botany Bay
23-24 May at Bustard Bay
29-31 May at Thirsty Bay
16 July- 4 August at Endeavour River
(Cooktown)
3 September at Cooks” Bay, New Guinea
18-2] September at Savu (Sawu) Indonesia
10-26 October at Batavia (Jakarta) Java
4-14 January at Princes Island
13. May- 7 June at Ship Cove, Queen
Charlotte Sound, New Zealand
3-25. November at Ship Cove, Queen
Charlotte Sound, New Zealand
23 March- 11 May at Dusky Sound, New
Zealand
24 December- 7 January at Kerguelen’s
Land
26-30 January at
Tasmania
12-25 February at Ship Cove, Queen
Charlotte Sound, New Zealand
The letters BMNH are used to denote the British
Museum (Natural History)
1770
1771
1773
1776-77
Adventure Bay,
CLASSIFICATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND
NEW ZEALAND COLEOPTERA IN THE BANKS
COLLECTION
This classification follows that of E. Britton in
“Insects of Australia’ published by the C.S.1.R,O.
(1970: pp. 517-8),
New synonyms, and those species Fabricius
renamed in later publications, now regarded as
synonyms, are given in this classification. A full list
of synonyms is given under the heading of each
species,
The original generic names are in parentheses.
159
*Denotes that the species has been omitted from
recent catalogues.
*Denotes a new synonym.
FAMILY CARABIDAE
sub-family Scaritinae
Laccopterum cyaneum (F.) (Scarites)
sub-family Cicindelinae
Cicindela tuberculata F.
FAMILY DYTISCIDAE
Platynectes decempuncratus (F \
(Dytiscus)
FAMILY GYRINIDAE
Dineutes australis (F.) (Gyrinus)
FAMILY HISTERIDAE
Saprinus cyaneus (F.) (Hister)
* Saprinus detritus (F.) (Hister)
FAMILY SCAPHIDITIDAE
Scaphidium quadripustulaium (F,)
(Sphaeridium)
FAMILY STAPHYLINIDAE
Creophilus aculatus (F,) (Staphylinus)
Creophilus erythracephalus (F.) (Staphy-
linus)
FAMILY LUCANIDAE
Lissotes cancroides (F.) (Lucanus)
FAMILY SCARABAEIDAE
sub-family Scarabaeinac
Onthophagus quadripustulatus (F.) 2
(Scarabaeus)
= O, bipustulatus (F.) (Scarabaeus) ?
Tesserodon novaehollandiae (F.)
(Scarabaeus)
= T-. hollandiae (F.) (Scarabaeus)
sub-family Cetoniinae
Glycyphana stolata (F.) (Cetonia)
= G. fasciata (F.) (Cetonia)
sub-family Dynastinae
Haploscapanes barbarossa (F.)
(Scarabaeus)
Pericoptus truncatus (F.) (Scarabaeus)
sub-family Melolonthinae
Calonota festiva (F.) (Melolontha)
C. festiva var, laeta (F.) (Melolontha)
Chlorochiton suturalis (F.) (Melolontha)
Liparetrus sylvicolus (F.) (Melolontha)
Liparetus monticolus (F.) (Melolontha)
sub-family Rutelinae
Repsimus aeneus (F.) (Meloloniha)
FAMILY PSEPHENIDAE
* Sclerocyphon collaris (F.) (Tritoma)
+ = §S. hicolor Carter
FAMILY BUPRESTIDAE
sub-family Buprestinae
Cisseis s.g. Neospades eruciata (F.)
(Buprestis)
160)
sub-family Chalcophorinae
Cyphogastra farinosa (F.) (Buprestis)
FAMILY RHIPICERIDAE
Rhipicera mystacina (P.) (Hispa)
FAMILY LAMPYRIDAE
Luciola australis (F.) (Lampyris) in
Glasgow
FAMILY MELYRIDAE (DASYTIDAE)
Dasytes minutus (F.) (anobium)
= D. subcyaneus Broun
++
FAMILY DERMESTIDAE
Dermestes carnivorus F. (carniforus F.)
Dermesies felinus F. is a synonym of D.
ater Degeer
FAMILY BOSTRYCHIDAE
Bostrychopsis jesuita (F.) (Apate)
Dinoderus minutus (F.) (Apate) Type
lost
FAMILY LYCIDAE
Trichalus serraticornis (F.) (Lycus)
FAMILY CLERIDAE
Eunstalis percata (F.) (Notoxus)
Phymatophaea violacea (F.) (Noloxus)
= Balcus niger Sharp
4+
i]
FAMILY NITIDULIDAE
Macroura abbreviata (F.) (Nitidula)
FAMILY PHYCOSECIDAE
* Phycosecis limbatus (F.) (Dermestes)
FAMILY COCCINELLIDAE
Coccinella leonina F.
Coelophora inaequalis (F.) (Coccinella)
Coelophora novemmaculata (F,) (Coc-
cinella)
= Coelophora novempunctata (F.) (Coc-
cinella)
Epilachna guttato-pustulata (F,) (Coe-
cinella)
Veranis striola (F.) (Coccinella)
= V. lineola (F.) (Coccinella)
FAMILY COLYDIDAE
Ulonotus scaber (F.) (Dermestes)
= U. integer Sharp
oo
'
FAMILY TENEBRIONIDAE
sub-family Ulominae
Adelium porculatum (F.) (Calosoma)
=A. porcatus (F.) (Carabus)
Alphitobius laevigatus (F.) (Opatrum)
Celibe laevicallis (F.) (Silpha)
Dermestes navalis (F,) is a synonym of
Triboloides (Blair 1913) ferrugineus (F.)
* Uloma sanguinipes (F.) (Tenebrio)
sub-family Amarygminae
Amarygmus bicolor (F.) (Eratylus)
* Amarygmus morio (F.) (Erotylus)
Chaleopterus amethystinus (F.)
(Erotylus)
*
REC. §. AUST. MUS 18 (8): 155-197 January, 1981
Chalcopterus cupreus (F.) (Erotylus)
= Ch. setoasus Blackburn
Chalcopterus smaragdulus (F,)
(Erotylus)
FAMILY LAGRITDAE
Lagria tomentosa F.
FAMILY ALLECULIDAE
*“ Homotrysis rufipes (F.) (Helops)
FAMILY OEDEMERIDAE
* Dohrnia tristis (F.) (Necydalis)
Selenopalpus cyaneus (F.) (Lagria)
+ = S. subviridus White
Sessinia lineata (F.) (Lagria)
FAMILY CERAMBYCIDAE
sub-family Prioninae
Toxeutus arcuatus (F.) (Prionus)
sub-family Lamiinae
Depsages solandri (F.) (Lamia)
Hybolasius cristus (F.) (Lamia)
Xylotoles griseus (F,) (Saperda)
Xylotoles lynceus (F.) (Saperda)
sub-family Cerambycinae
Coptomma variegata (F.) (Callidium)
Hesthesis variegata (F,) (Leptura) Type
lost
Navomorpha lineata (F,) (Callidium)
Navomorpha sulcata (F.) (Callidium)
Oemona hirta (F.) 3 (Saperda)
= O, villosa (F,) 2 (Saperda)
Pachydissus obscurus (F,) (Callidium)
Phoracantha semipunctata (F.)
(Stenocorus)
Zorion minuta (F.) (Callidium)
Lamia bidens F. Present status
unknown as type missing
FAMILY CHRYSOMELIDAE
sub-family Cassidinae
Aspidomorpha deusta (F,) (Cassida)
Aspidomorpha interrupta (F,) (Cassida)
sub-family Chrysomelinae
Calomela crassicornis (F.) (Chrysomela)
Chalcolampra octodecimguttata (F.)
(Chrysomela)
Paropsis s.g. Chrysophtharta detrita (F.)
(Coccinella)
= P. laesa Germ,
Paropsisterna moria (F,) (Chrysomela)
Phyllocharis cyanicornis (F.) (Chry-
somela)
Phyllocharis cyanipes (F.) (Chrysomela)
Phyllocharis nigricornis (F.) (Chryso-
mela)
sub-family Criocerinae
Crioceris nigripes F.
Lema bifasciata (F.) (Crioceris)
Lema aculata (F.) (Crioceris)
Lema unifasciata (F.) (Crioceris)
a>
-b
THE FABRICIAN TYPES OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND COLEOPTERA 161
sub-family Eumolpinae
Encolaspsis brunnea (F.) (Chrysomela)
Rhyparida didyma (F.) (Crypto-
cephalus)
sub-family Galerucinae
* Monolepta cyanocephala (F.) (Crioceris)
+ = M, antennalis Lea
Synodita melanocephala (F,) (Crioceris)
sub-family Halticinae
Lieyllus 4-punctata (F,) (Galleruca)
= Altica albicollis F.
ANTHRIBIDAE
Phloeobius griseus (F.) (Anthribus) Type
missing
> Ptinus gigas F.
BELIDAE
Agathinus tridens (F.) (Curculio)
Belus semipunctatus (F.) (Curculio)
BRENTHIDAE
Lasiorrhynchus barbicornis (F,) (Cur-
culio)
= Curculio assimilis F.
FAMILY CURCULIONIDAE
sub-family Aterpinae
Aterpus cultratus (F.) (Curculio)
Chrysolopus spectabilis (F.) (Curculio)
sub-family Brachydeérinae
Protomus scutellaris (F.) (Curculio)
sub-family Cossoninae
* Cossonideus lineolus (F,) (Curculio)
sub-family Cryptorrhynchinae
Euthyrhinus meditabundus (F.) (Cur-
culio)
Onmtydaus luridus (F.) (Curculio)
* Tentegia stupida (F.) (Curculio)
= Rhynchaeus strepidus F.
* = T. ingrata Faust
Curculio cruciatus F, Present
unknown
+ = Acalles doriae Pasc.
sub-family Curculioninae
Curculio amoenus F.
Orthorrhinus cylindrirostris (F.)
(Curculia)
sub-family Erirrhininae
Nyxtes bidens (F,) (Curculio)
Stephanorrhychus attelaboides (F.)
(Curculio)
Tysius bicornis (F,) (Curculie)
sub-farmly Haplonychinae
“ Haplonyx haemorrhoidalis (F.)
(Curcullo)
sub-family Leptopiinae
Catoptes interruptus (F.) (Curculio)
Leptopius clavus (F.) (Curculio)
Leptopius quadridens (F.) (Curculio)
Leptopius tribulus (F.) (Curculio)
Stenocarynus crenulatus (F.) (Cureulio)
FAMILY
FAMILY
FAMILY
status
sub-family Otiorrhynchinae
* Oribius adspersus (F.) (Curculio)
sub-family Rhadinosominae
Rhadinomus acuminatus (F.) (Curculio)
sub-family Rhynchophorinae
Cureulio bituberculatms F. is a synonym
of Sitophilus oryzae Linné
sub-family Rhyparosominae
* Cecyropa modesta (F.) (Curculio)
The present status of the following species has not
yet been determined:—
* Rhynchaenus curvirostris F, (Curculia)
* Rhynchaenus exclamationis F. (Curculio)
DISCUSSION OF SPECIES
ABBREVIATA, Nitidula
Fabricius 1781, p. 91, n, 3
Junk’s Catal. 1913, 15, 56, p. 155 (Aethina)
Zimsen 1964, p. 81, n. 1138
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius ‘‘Nitidula abbreyiata Fabr, Spec.
Ins. n. 3”
ii. BMNH ‘“‘Nitidula abbreviata’’
Locality: “nova Zelandia”’. It is doubtful that this
locality is correct,
Current status: Macroura abbreviata (F.):
Nitidulidae.
Comment: Except for the mesothoracic legs, mast
of which are missing, the specimen is in fairly good
condition.
This species belongs to the genus Macroura and
not to the genus Aethina in which it has previously
been placed. The genus Macroura is represented by
species from India, East Indies, Australia and New
Guinea. It is, therefore, possible that if the locality
New Zealand is incorrect that it should be one of the
above localities where Banks collected. The locality
New Zealand has been queried by Broun (1880: p.
171) who stated “I have not seen any insect agreeing
with Fabricius’s description”, also by Sharp (1891: p.
350) and by Grouvelle (1912; p. 398), In Grouvelle’s
table of the genus (1912: p. 574), it is very close to
M, javanica Grouy. and M. orientalis Nictur.
ACUMINATUS, Curculio
Fabricius 1775, p. 152, n. 132; 1801, 2. p. 535, n. 168
Junk’s Catal. 1937, 28, 154 p. 1 (Rhadinosomus)
Zimsen 1964, p. 219, n. 3781
Kuschel 1970, p. 203
Lectotype (Kuschel) labels:
i. Fabricius ‘Cure, Acuminatus Fab. Entom-
p. 182 n. 132"
142 REC. $8. AUST, MUS [8 (&): 155-197
ii. BMNH “Curculio acuminatus”, ‘‘Type”’
Locality: “nova Zelandia”
Current status: Rhadinosamus acuminatus (F.):
Curculionidae, Rhadinosominae.
Comment: Lectotype is a male. It is very dirty and
in poor condition, pinned through left elytron part of
which is missing, right elytron and left meta-thoracie
leg are also missing, There is a second male
specimen, a paralectotype, which is very badly
damaged, head, prothorax and right metathoracic
leg are missing,
Broun (1880: p. 430), following Lacordaire (1866:
p. 63) attributed this species to Schdénherr, since
then the correction has been made. Kuschel
designated the lectotype.
ADSPERSUS, Ctirctilio
Fabricius 1775, p. 149, n. 118; 1801, 2, p. 329, a.
131.
Zimsen 1964, p. 217. n. 3752,
Holotype labels:
i, Fabricius ‘Curc. Adspersus Fab. Sp. Ins.
n. 165.
ii, BMNH “Curculio adspersus”.
Locality: ‘nova Hollandia”’. This species may
possibly be from New Guinea or the East Indies.
Current status: Oribius adspersus (F.) Cur-
culionidae, Otierrhynchinae-
Comment: The holotype is in poor condition,
head and prothorax have been broken off and glued
on to the rest of body: left antenna, tarsi of
prothoracic legs, both mesothoraci¢ legs and right
metathoracic leg are missing. C.O. Waterhouse did
not identify this specimen as a “type”. There has
been a great deal of contusion in the literature about
this species.
Zimsen records three specimens under the name
Curculio adspersus, namely the numbers 3473, 3638,
and 3752.
Number 3638:—The type is recarded as “in
Cajenne Dom.V.Rohr” with the reference Mant
Ins. 1, p. 106. It is listed in Junk’s catalogue as
lleomus mucoreus L. This species does not concern
the Banks Collection.
Number 3473:—This was named by Fabricius as
Rhychaenus pallux, which is now recorded by both
Zimsen, and Csiki in Junk’s catalogue 1934, 29, 137,
28 as a synonym of Hypera (Erirhinomorphus)
adspersus (F.). This is not the species in the Banks
Collection and should not be known by the specific
name of adspersus as it is a jumior homonym, but by
the name given hy Fabricius in 1801, 2, p. 457, 0. 94,
namely R. pollux,
Number 3752:—Curculia adspersus F. is recorded
by Zimsen and as “in nova Hollandia in Dom.
January, IYS1
Banks—London 1 specimen”, and gives the original
reference of 1775. This species ts not listed by Csiki
in Junk's catalogue, but he does give two references,
namely Systema Eleutheratorum 2, 1801, p, 529, n.
131, and Herbst, Nat, Ins. Kal. 6, 1795, p. 258 for
the species H. (Erirhinomorphus) adspersus (F.)
which is incorrect. These two references are for the
Fabrician species Oribius adspersus (F.), number
3752 in Zimsen, It was classified into the penus
Oribius by R. T, Thompson of the BMNH (pers.
comm.), O. adspersus (F.) is the senior homonym,
The other two species which Fabricius names
Curculio adspersus were renamed by him in Syst. El.
as Rhynchaenus pollux and Lixius roreus, and these
specific names should now be used for them. L
roreus F, is a synonym of Ileomus mucoreus L,
AENEA, Melolontha
Fabricius 1775, p. 34, n, 11; 1801, 2, p. 166, n 30
aeratus Linne 1790, p, 1570 (Scarabaeus)
purpureipes Macl. 1871, p. 197 (Repsimus).
Junk’s Catal. Suppl. 66 p. 285 (Repsimus).
Zimsen 1964, p, 144, n. 2360.
Carne 1958. p, 178-9.
Holatype labels:
ij. Fabricius “Melal. aenea Fabr. Sp. Ins. n-
4.
iii BMNH ‘“‘Melolontha Aenea”, “Type”.
Locality: “nova Hollandia".
Current status; Repsimus aeneus (F.);
Scarabaeidae, Ruterlinae.
Comment: The condition of the holotype is good,
except that the mouth parts are covered with dried
mycelial hyphae. This species is the type of the genus
Repsimus. The reference on the label is not the
original reference. This probably accounts for the
fact that Fabricius would have re-examined this
species before publishing Spec. Ins. 1781 and when
compiling this list put this reference on the specimen
before actual publication as there is no page
reference given. Carne (idem) discusses the
synonymy of this species in full.
ALBICOLLIS F., Altica
See QUADRIPUNCTATA F., Galleruca
A. albicollis F, is the junior homonym,
AMETHYSTINUS, Erotylus
Fabricius 1775, p. 124, n. 7; 1801, 2. p- 13, n. 6
(Cnodulon)
Junk’s Catal, 1911, 18, 28, p. 579 (Chalcopterus)
Zimsen 1964, p. 116, n, 1806
THE FABRICIAN TYPES OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND COLEOPTERA
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius “‘Erot, Amethystinus
Entom. p. 124 n, 7”
ii; BMNH "Cnodulon amethystinus"’,
“Type”
Fab.
Locality: “nova Hollandia”’
Current status: Chalcopterus amethystinus (F.);
Tenebrionidae, Amarygminae
Comment: The condition of the holotype is good,
though the head is retracted somewhat into the
prothorax, parts of both antennae are missing.
The spelling in the 1775 reference is Erotylus
amethystines though on the label the specific name is
spelt amethystinus, So the ending “‘es" is probably a
misprint.
Blair (1914; p. 489) studied this species in relation
to the specimens identified by Blackburn and Carter
as Ch. amethystinus (F.). He points out the
differences between these specimens and the
Fabrician type.
“|. In the type, the legs are entirely black, in
the other specimens the femora is red and
sometimes there are traces of red coloura-
tion on the tibiae.
2. In the type there is a small but distinct
depression in the centre of each half of the
prothorax, this is absent in the other
specimens.
3. The anterior margin of the prothoran is
slightly sinuate in the type but not so in the
other specimens.
4. Punctures of the elytra are heavier in the
type than in the other specimens.”
Blair considered that the Fabrician species is
nearest to Ch. pulcher Blkb. but is “not identical
with it’. In his opinion the specimens identified by
Blackburn and Carter (1913: p. 10) as Ch.
amethystinus F, are not the Fabrician species.
‘This is another species Fabricius reclassified in his
later publications.
AMOENUS, Curculio
Fabricius 1775, p. 142, 0. 81: L801, 2, p. 489, n. 239
(Rhynchaenus)
Junk’s Catal. 1923, 29, 123,
Zimsen 1964, p. 208, n. 3582
Holotype labels:
i, Fabricius "Cure. Amoenus Fabr. §. Ent. p,
142, 0. 81"
i. BMNH “Rhynchaenus amoenus”, “Type”
Locality: “nova Hollandia”
Current status: Cureulid amoenus F,:
Curculionidae, Curculioninae.
Comment: Holotype is in good condition. all
structures are complete. At one time this species was
13
placed in the genus Balaninus but is now back in is
original genus Curculio,
ARCUATUS, Prionus
Fabricgius 1787.1, p. 129, 0.9; 1801, 2, p. 259, n. 10
eurvous Gmel. 1789, p. 1817. After McKeown
1947
Junk's Catal, 1913, 22, 52, p. 38
Zimsen 1964, p. 163, n. 2717
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius “Prionus Arcuatus vy. Diem. land
Nelson Fabr. Mss”’.
ii. Fabricius “Prionus arcuatus Fabr. Mant.
Ins, n, 9”
iii, BMNH ‘Priomuas arcuatus”, “Type”
Locality: ‘“‘Terra Diemenii"'
Current status: Toxeufes arcuatus (F.): Ceramby-
cidae, Prioninae.
Comment: Holotype has been pinned twice, now
through the right elytron, previously through the
prothorax; terminal joints of left antenna and some
tarsi of mesothoracic legs ure missing.
Lameere (1904 p. 24) studied the holotype and
gives a detailed description of it.
The name Nelson on the label, is that of the
collector who sailed with Cook on his third voyage,
and collected at Adventure Bay, Tasmania.
ASSIMILIS, Curculio
Fabricius 1775, p. 134, n. 42; 1801, 2 p. 546, n, 3
(Brentus)
Junk’s Catal. 1927, 26, 89, p. 58 (Lasiorhynchus)
Zimsen 1964, p. 221, n, 3833
Kuschel 1970, p. 194
Lectotype (Kuschel) label;
i. Fabricius ‘Brent. Assimilis Fabr. M. Ins.
n. 9"
ii. BMNH *'Brentus assimilis”, ““Type”’
Locality: “nova Zelandia”’
Current status: synonym of Lasiorrhynchus
harbaricornis (F.)
Comments: “Type” is a female, pinned through
left elytron which has been glued on to specimen,
Otherwise specimen is in good condition, except for
terminal joints of both antennae which are missing,
The reference number 9 on the label is incorrect, it
should be number 2, Kuschel (idem,) designates this
specimen as the lectotype and the specimen in
Fabricius'’s own collection as a paralectotype,
ATTELABOIDES, Curculio
Fabricius 1775, p, 156, n. 162; 1801, 2, p, 545, n. 227
osculator Broun 1909, p. 134
Junk's Catal. 1934, 28, 140, p. 81 (Stephanorrhyn-
chus)
164
Zimsen 1964, p. 221, n. 3832
Kuschel 1970, p. 199
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius “Curc. attelaboides Fab. Entom.
156 n. 152
ii. BMNH “Cureulio attelaboides”
Locality: ‘Brasilia’. This locality is incorrect. [tis
a New Zealand species.
Current status: Stephanorhynchus atielaboides (F.)
Curculionidae, Erirrhininae
Comment: Holotype is a female. This. species is
endemic to New Zealand and was identified in the
Collection by Kuschel (1970; p. 191) as being
erroneously recorded from Brazil, Kuschel (1970: p.
199) gives a key to the indentification of this species
and its closely related species.
AUSTRALIS, Gyrinus
Fabricius 1775, p. 235, n. 2; 1801, 1, p. 275, n. 3
rufipes F. 1801, 1, p. 276, n. 13
dentipennis Macl, 1825, p. 30
limbatus Mae}. 1825, p. 30
iridus Hope 1842, p. 428
leucopoda Montr, 1860, p. 245 (Dineutus)
janthinus Reg., 1882, p. 421 (Dineutes)
dentatus Sutfr, 1842, p. 256 (Dineutes)
Leucopus Montr. 1860, p. 245 (Dineutes)
Junk'’s Catal. 1910, 4, 21, p. 4 (Dineutes)
Zimsen 1964, p. 70, n. 927
Ochs 1949, p. 192
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius ‘‘australis’’
ii. BMNH “Gyrinus australis’’ museum regis-
ter number 63-46.
Locality: ‘fin novae Hollandiae aquis”’
Current status: Dineutus australis (F.); Gyrinidae,
Comment: The holotype has been broken
between the meso and metathorax and then glued
together. The full list of synonyms and literature
concerning this species is given by Ochs (idem.).
Fabricius described the female of this species at a
later date under the name of G., rufipes F.. which is
now a synonym, the type of which is in ‘“‘Dom
Billardiae". D. dentatus Suffr and D, leucopus
Montr. are not listed by Ochs as synonyms as they
are not Australian species.
AUSTRALIS, Lampyris
Fabricius 1775, p. 201, n. 11; 1801, 2, p. 104, n, 23
Junk’s Catal, Suppl. 1966, 9, p. 99 (Luciola)
Zimsen 1964, p. 133, n, 2141
REC, 8. AUST. MUS 18 (8): 155-197
January, 198]
Holotype is missing from the Collection, “Type” has
recently been found in the Hunterian Collection
in Glasgow.
Locality: “nova Hollandia”
Current status: Luciola australis (F.) Lampyridae.
Comment: In Gemminger et Harold Catalogue
this species is recorded under the name Luciola
australis (F.) and the locality is erroneously given as
“Noy. Island” (New Ireland). Boisduval (1835; p.
125) gives the same locality. However, Masters (p.
312) and MeDermot in Junk's Suppl (idem.) records
the Fabrician locality, ‘Australia’. Masters records
two synonyms L, guerini Laporte and L. nigripennis
Latr. McDermot states that L. guerini Laporte is
from New Guinea and is not a synonym of L.
australis (F.). L. nigripennis Latr is not listed by
MeDermot and Lea (1909: p,108) regards L.
nigripennis Latr as merely a “catalogue name’.
Therefore there is no recognised synonym of L.
australis (F.).
BARBAROSSA, Scarabaeus
Fabricius 1775, p, 12, n, 35: 1801, 1, p. 47
(Geotrupes)
var similis Prell 1934, p. 57.
Junk’s Catal. 1937, 21, 156, p. 93 (Haploscapanes)
Zimsen 1964, p. 22, n. 28 (Geotrupes)
Carne 1957, p. 190
Syntypes labels;
i. Fabricius “Scarab. Barbarossa” Fabr, Sp
Ins, No. 41.
ii. BMNH “Geotrupes barbarossa’”
Locality; ‘Nova Hollandia”’
Current status: Haploscapanes barbarossa (F,),:
Scarabaeidae, Dynastinae.
Comment: There are two specimens, a male and
female. The condition of the male is fair; only two
basal joints of the antennae are present and the
terminal joints of the left labial palp and most of the
tarsi are missing. The female is an exceptionally
large specimen and is in good condition, The
reference on the label is the 1781 reference so
Fabricius must have re-examined this specimen in
1780-1.
BARBICORNIS, Curculio
Fabricius 1775, p. 134, n. 41; 1801, 2, p, 545, n. |
(Brentus)
assimilis F. 1775, p. 134
Junk’s Catal. 1927, 26, 89, p, S& (Lasiormhynchus)
Zimsen 1964, p, 221, n, 3833
Kuschel 1970, p. 193-5
Lectotype (Kuschel) labels:
i. Fabricius “‘Brentus Barbicornis Fabr.
THE FABRICIAN TYPES OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND COLEOPTERA
Mant, Ins, n. L"
ij BMNH ‘Brentus barbicornis’’, “’Type"’
Locality: “nova Zelandia™
Current status: Lasiorrhynchus barhicornis (F.):
Brenthidae
Comments: There are two specimens both males.
The “type” specimen designated by Kuschel as the
lectotype is very dirty and terminal joints of lett
antenna are missing. In the 2nd specimen, a male, a
paralectotype (Kuschel) head is missing. Broun
(1880: p. 543) notes that there is great variation in
length of this species. The reference on the Jabel
indicates that Fabricius must have re-examined this
species after the original 1775 publication and before
the Mantissa Insectorum was published as there is no
page number given, the page number is 95.
BICOLOR, Erotylus
Fabricius 1775, p, 124, n, 8; 1801, 2, p. 14, n. 7
(Cebrio)
tardus Blk. 1889 p. 1271
var torridus Pasc. 1869 p. 351
Junk’s Catal, 1911, 18, 28, p, 578 (Amarygmus)
Zimsen 1964, p, 116, n, 1807
Carter 1926, p. 158
(Amarygmus)
Holotype labels;
i, Fabricius “Erotylus Bicolor Fab. Entom.
p. 124 n. 8”
ii, BMNH “Cnodulon bicolor’, “Type”
Locality; “nova Hollandia”
Current status: Amarygmus bicolor (F.): Teneb-
rionidae, Amarygminae
Comment; The holotype is in a poor state of
preservation. The ventral surface is covered with dirt
and mycelium, except for the terminal joints of the
right antenna all structures appear to be present but
are difficult to discern, Carter (1915: p. 33) discusses
the synonym of this species fully, This reference
includes a copy of the correspondence between
Carter and Blair of the BMNH who compared the
Fabrician type With the type of A. tardus Blkb.
which is in the BMNH, Fabricius changed the genus
of this species in his later publication. This species is
recorded in Junk’s Catalogue (idem.) as a queried
synonym of Chalcopterus affinis Bless. This is not
accepted by Carter (idem.).
BICORNIS, Curculio
Fabricius 1781, 1, p. 180, n. 111; 1801, 2, p. 489, n.
241 (Rhynchaenus)
amplipennis Pasc. 1875, p. 218
purus Broun 1893, p. 1224 (Tysiius)
Zimsen 1964, p. 208, 108, n. 3584
Kuschel 1970, p. 202
165
Lectotype (Kuschel 1970) labels:
i. Fabricius “Cure, Bicornis Fabr. Sp. Ins. n.
ya"
ii. BMNH “Rhynchaenus bicornis’, “Type”
Locality: “nova Zelandia”
Current status: Tysius bicornis (F,): Cur-
culionidae, Erirrhininue
Comment; The lectotype is badly damaged; head,
tarsi of right prothoracic leg, Jeft prothoracic leg
except for coxa and trochanter, and right
metathoracic leg are missing. This species was for
sometime omitted from the catalogues. G. Kuschel
places this species in the genus Tysius, He regards
this “type”, a male, as the lectotype although the
Fabrician reference says “Mus. Dom. Banks’’ and
there is only one specimen in the collection. There is
a female in Fabricius’s own collection which he
names as a paralectotype.
BIDENS, Lamia
Fabricius 1775, p. 177, n, 30; 1801, 2, p. 304, n. 124,
Junk’s Catal. 1923, 23, 74, p. 604.
Zimsen 1964, p. 172, n. 2890.
Labels of specimen in collection;
i. Fabricius “Lamia Bidens Fab. Entom.
p. 177 n. 30",
ii. BMNH “Lamia bidens’’. This label and
the ‘Type label” have been crossed out
and the word “Bidens” queried.
iii, A mutilated label—'‘an bidens fabricii?"’
Loeality: “nova Hollandia”.
Comment: This specimen cannot be the **Fabri-
cian type of L. bidens. It is in good condition but has
been badly pinned. I have been unable to identify it.
Aurivillus (Junk's Catal. idem.) and McKeown
(1947; p. 174) both list this species among those
‘doubtful or unknown” genera. Oliver (1789: p. 67
Fab. 17 fig. 125) figures L. bidens F. as a small
narrow insect with the apices of the reddish-brown
elytra distinctly bidentate.
BIDENS, Curculio
Fabricius 1775, p. 136, n. 51; 1801, 2, p. 457, n. 96
(Rhynchaenus)
rufipes Broun 1881, p. 718 (Nyxetes)
Junk’s Catal. 1934, 28, 140, p. 84 (Nyxetes),
Zimsen 1964, p. 203, n. 3474.
Kuschel 1970, p. 201,
Lectotype labels:
i. Fabricius ‘Cure,
p. 136 n, 51".
ii. BMNH “‘Rhynchaenus”, ''Type”
Bidens Fab. Entom.
Locality: “nova Zelandia"’.
166
Current status: Nyxeles bidens (F.): Cur-
culionidae, Erirrhininae.
Comment: Glue is present on both dorsal and
ventral surfaces; spine-like clusters of hairs on right
elytron are broken, abdomen twisted and lying at
right angles to the rest of body; antennae, most tarsi
and right metathoracic leg are missing: The colour of
this species varies from reddish brown to black,
“type” is black. Fabricius changed the genus in his
later publications. Kuschel designated this specimen
as a lectotype.
BIFASCIATA, Crioceris (Lema)
Fabricius 1775, p. 120, n. 12; 1801, 1, p. 476, n_ 29
(Lema).
Junk's Catal, 1924, 24, 51, p. 55 (Lema).
Zimsen 1964, p. 107, n. 1645,
Syntype labels:
i. Fabricius “Crioc, bifasciata Fab. Entom,
p. 120, n. 12”.
ii. BMNH “Lema bifasciata’’, ‘’Type"’.
Locality: “nova Hallandia”,
Current status: Lema hifasciata
melidae, Criocerinae.
F.: Chryso-
Comment: The condition of the “type” is fair,
parts of the antennae and tarsi of right metathoracic
legs are missing. The second specimen is not in as
good a condition as the “type". and it is pinned
through the left elytron, Fabricius re-classified this
species in 1801 into the genus Lema.
BIPUSTULATUS, Scarabaeus
Fabricius 1775, p, 30, n. 121; 1801, 1, p. 62. n 37
(Ateuchus)
Junk's catal. 1927, 19, 90, p, 209 (Onthephagus)
Zimsen 1964, p. 31, n. 188
Matthews 1972, p, 220 (Onthophagus)
Holotype labels:
i, Fabricius “Scarab. 2-pustulatus’’ Fab. Sp.
Ins. No. 152
ii. BMNH *‘Ateuchus bipustulatus”’
Locality: “‘nova Hollandia”
Current status; synonym of Onthophagus quad-
ripustulatus (F.),
Comment: Holotype is badly pinned through the
left elytron. Several legs are without tarsi and the
club of the left antenna jis missing. O, bipustulatus
(F.) is a female and the synonym has been
established by Matthews (idem).
BITUBERCULATLUS, Curculio
Fabricius 1781, 1 p. 171, n. 58; 1801, 2, p. 438, n, 42
Junk’s Catal. 1936, 30, 149, p. 111
REC §. AUST, MUS 18 (8): 155-197
January. [98]
Zimsen 1964, p. 199, n. 301
Kuschel 1970, p. 197
Holotype labels:
i, Fabricius “Curc. 2-taberculatus Fabr. Sp-
Ins. n. 58"
ii. BMNH “Calandra 2-tuberculata’’, “type”
Locality: “nova Zelandia”
Current status: C. bituberculatus F. is a synonym
of Sitophilus oryzae Linné: Curculionidae, Rhyn-
chophorinac.
Comment: The holotype is badly pinned, head
and most tarsi are missing. Oliver (1807: p. 954. [67)
describes this species, stating that the body ts a
ferrugineus uniform colour and without marks, and
that the specimen in the Bank's Collection is without
any raised tubercles on the prothorax as described
by Fabricius. Herbst (1795: p. 29) and Broun (1880:
p, 504) both note the same absence of tubercles.
Kuschel (1970; p, 197) makes no reference to this.
Kuschel determined the synonymy. He also explains
the confusion caused in identifying this species as it
had been erroneously associated with the weevils
Dryophthorus ecrenatus Boisd. and Mitrastethus
baridioides Redtenbacher.
BRUNNEA, Chrysomela
Fabricius 1781, 1 p. 123, n, 44; 1801, 1, p. 439, n, 104
Junk’s Catal, 1914, 24, 59, p. 22
Zimsen 1964, p, 100, n. 1504
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius ‘Chr, Brunnea Fabr, Sp, Ins, n,
44"
ii, BMNH “Chrysomela brunnea”, Type”
Locality: “nova Zelandia''—Zimsen (1964) and
Musgrave (1952) record the locality as ‘tnova
Hollandia’” as given by Fabricius in his 178]
publication, In his later publications of 1792 & 1801
Fabricius corrects this and gives the correct locality
as “nova Zelandia”.
Current status: Eucolapsis brunnea (F.): Chry-
somelidae, Eumalpinae,
Comment: The condition of the holotype is poor,
and the structures on the ventral surface are covered
with glue and dirt. Parts of both antennae and parts
of all legs are missing. There are several colour
varieties of this species. The holotype is reddish and
there is no trace of any green colour, as on some
specimens, this may be due to fading. This species is
described by Broun (1880; p. 622) and his account
corresponds very closely to it, and the three
specimens in his own collection are identical with the
“type”, Broun records the habitat as ‘‘New Zealand
on the flowers of Leptospermum"’. Musgrave (1932:
p, 87) incorrectly records the Fabrician genus as
being Coccinella.
THE FABRICIAN TYPES OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND COLEOPTERA
CANCROIDES, Lucanus
Fabricius 1787, l, p. 2, n. 9; 1801, 2, p. 252, n. 18
Junk's Catal, 1960, 8, p. 39
Zimsen 1964, p. 162, n, 2071
Holotype labels:
i, Fabricius ‘Lucan,
Mant, Ins, n, 9"
li, BMNH “‘Lucanus Crancroides”, ''Type™
Crancroides Fabr.
Locality; “Terra Diemenii”
Current status: Lissetes crancroides (F.);
Lucanidae.,
Comment: Holotype has been pinned twice, now
through the right elytron but previously through the
prothorax: mouth parts and tarsi covered in dirt;
tarsi of right prothoracie and left metathoracic leg,
and right mesothoracic leg are missing,
Westwood (1871: p, 371) gives a full description of
this species. and compares it with closely allied
species.
CARNIVORUS, Dermestes
Fabricius 1775, p. 55, n. 2, (D. carniforus); 1801, 1,
p. 31,22
Junk’s Catal. 1911, 14, 33, p. 42
Zimsen 1964, p, 64, n. 1048
Hinton 1945, p. 287
Locality: ‘tin nova Hollandia et Zelandia™ in 1775.
“in nova Hollandia et in Germania" in
Ta01,
Current status: Dermestes carnivorus F.: Dermes-
tidae
Comment: Fabricius changed the ‘‘habitat” in
1801 and added that the “type’’ was in ‘Dom
Smidt”, having previously in 1775 stated it was in
“Mus. Dom. Banks”. The spelling in 1775 of the
species as “carniforus’’ is possibly a misprint as in all
later publications it is spelt carnivorus. Hinton
records the distribution of this species as ““N. & S.
America, Europe and India’. According to Fauvel
(1889) it is indigenous to America, It seems probable
that this insect may have been found on the
Endeavour, having been brought aboard with stores,
thus giving rise to the confusion of its place of origin,
This then is not an Australian or New Zealand
species,
CLAVUS, Curculio
Fabricius 1775, p. 154, mn. 140, 1801, 2, p,
elegans Lea 1916 p. 332
Junk’s Catal, 1931, 28, 114, p. 18 (Leptops)
Zimsen 1964, p. 219, n, 3789
536,n. 177
Holotype Jabels:
i. Fabricius “Curcul.
p, 154 n, 140'
Clavus Fab. Entom.
167
ii. BMNH “Curculio clavus’’, ‘“Type”,
Locality: “nova Hollandia”
Current status: Lepropius (Oke 1951) clavus (F.):
Curculionidae, Leptopinae.
Comment: Holotype is pinned through the left
élytron, tarsi of left prothoracic leg and right
mesothoracie ley are missing. This species varies in
colour and intensity of red markings and in the
number of scales present.
COLLARIS, Tritoma
Fabricius 1775, p. 69, n, 2
bicolor Carter (Sclerocyphan) new synonym,
Zimsen 1964, p. 237, n. 4109
Holotype labels: Fabricius ‘'Tritoma Collaris Fab
Entom, 69 n, 2”
Locality: “nova Hollandia"
Current status: Sclerocyphon collaris (F.);
Psephenidae,
Comments: There is no BMNH label. This
speciment was added at the end of the named
specimens in the collection after it was found in 1964
by E. Zinsen “in the last box’ of the collection,
which consists of unnamed specimens.
The condition of the type is very poor, The
antennae and the abdomen are missing. The right
side of the prothorax 1s broken, but the broken piece
is lying on top of the prothorax. [t is badly pinned
and the right elytron is cracked, There is a large
lump of glue on the ventral surface and the insect is
covered with dried mycelial hyphae and debris.
This species has not only been omitted from the
catalogues but Fabricitis omitted it from his 1801
publication, the Systema Eleutheratorum, It is listed
in bis Species Insectorum and in Mantissa
Insectorum., However, the omission from the
Eleutheratorum may account for the fact that it was
not found in the arrangement of the Banks
Collection which was based on the order given in
that publication, While I was studying the collection
R. D. Pope of the BMNH classified this specimen as
a member of the family Psephenidae and as
belonging to the genus Sclereeyphon, (pers. com.)
While at the BMNH [ compared it with H. J,
Carter's (1935: p. 191) description of S. bicolor. This
described the Fabrician species, T. collaris F, There
was no Speciment of S. bicolor Carter in the BMNH,
so no comparison could be made, On returning to
Australia. ] was eventually able to track down a
paratype of S. bicolor Carter at the Zoology
Department at the University of Tasmania, where
Mrs, J, Smith is making a study of the genus
Sclerocyphon, The specimen was sent to R, D, Pope
at the BMNH and he made a comparison of the two
168
species, and agrees that S. bicolor Carter is a
synonym T. collaris F. In a letter received from Mr.
Pope he states: “I have compared the Carter
paratype with the specimen in the Banks Collection
and am quite sausfied that they are the same species.
The overall size, pronotal colour pattern and shape,
elytra punctation and colour all agree well. The
teeth on the hind margin of the pronotum from
margin of the scutellum and basal borders of the
elytra all correspond in size and distribution. The
colour pattern and general morphology of the head
also agree”.
CRASSICORNIS, Chrysomela
Fabricius 1775, p. 99, n. 27; 1801, 1, p. 437, n. 94.
Junk’s Catal. 1916, 24, 68, p. 193 (Calomela),
Zimsen 1964, p. 99, n, 1496,
Holotype labels;
i. Fabricius “Chrys. crassicornis Fab. Entom
p. 99, 27,
ii. BMNH “Chrysomela
“Type”.
crassicornis”’
Locality: “nova Hollandia’”’.
(F.);
Current status: Calomela crassicornis
Chrysomelidae, Chrysomelinae.
Comment; The holotype is not in good condition.
Glue on the ventral surface has covered the
metathorax and abdomen; lelt mesothoracic and
right metathoracie legs are missing. Baly (1855;
p. 249) gives a detailed description of this species.
However, the black markings on the “type” differ
somewhat from what Baly describes as typical of the
species. The general colour is fulvous, the “type”’
being paler than most specimens in the BMNH, but
this may be due to fading. The “type” differs from
Baly’s description in the following respects:—
1. no dark frontal patch on head
2. no black marking on prothorax
3. markings on each elytron are a_ single
rounded black basal spot, and an elongated
black streak posterior to it. Baly describes
the elytral markings as a “‘subtriangular
‘spot near the scutellum and a sinous vilta
.. extends nearly to the apex of the
elytron”.
CRENULATUS, Curculio
Fabricius 1775, p, 147, n. 105; 1801, 2, p. 518, n. 64,
australis Boisd. (Gastrodus),
Junk’s Catal, 1913, 28, 114, p. 16.
Zimsen 1964, p. 214, n. 3696.
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius “Cure, Crenulatus Fab, Entom.
p. 147, n. 105”.
ii. BMNH ‘Curculio crenulatus"’, *“Type’’.
REC, S, AUST. MUS t& (8); [55-197
January. S98T
Locality: “nova Hollandia™,
Current status: Stenocorynus crenulatus (F.):
Curculionidae, Leptopiinae.
Comment: Holotype is pinned through left
elytron; terminal joints of both antennae and tarsi of
left metathoracic leg are missing, it is also very
abraded only a few scales are present.
CRISTA, Lamia
Fabricius 1775, p. 170, n. 3; 1801, 2, p. 282, n. 6.
Junk’s Catal. 1922-23, 23, 74, p. 323.
Zimsen 1964, p. 167, n. 2787-
Holotype labels:
i, Fabricius ‘Lamia
p. 170 n. 3".
ii. BMNH “Lamia crista"’, *‘Type"’.
Crista Fab, Entom.
Locality: “nova Zelandia”™.
Current status: Flybolastus cristus (F.): Ceramy-
cidae, Lamiinae.
Comment: The holotype is in fairly good
condition; pinned through the left elytron which is
cracked; terminal joints of both antennae and tarsi
of right metathoracie leg are missing. Broun (1880:
p. 609-10) states that he examined the Fabrician type
and noted that Fabricius made an error when he
described the basal tubercles of the elytra as
tridentate, The mistake is due to the fact that the
tubercle is surmounted by “a compressed pencil of
hairs”.
CRUCIATA, Buprestis
Fabricius 1775, p. 222, n. 36; 1801, 2, p. 210, n. 134.
Junk’s Catal. 1935, 12, 143, p. 844.
Zimsen 1964, p, 155, n, 2568.
Carter 1923, p. 172 and 1929 p. 277.
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius Buprestis cruciata Fab. Entom.
p. 222 n, 36".
i. BMNH “Buprestis cruciata’’, ‘Type’.
Locality; “nova Hollandia”’.
Current status; Cisseis s.g. Neospades cruciata
(F.): Buprestidae, Buprestinae.
Comment: The holotype is in good condition
except for a large amount of glue on the ventral
surface. Carter (1929: p. 277) classified this species
in the genus Neospades which is now a sub-genus of
Cisseis.
CRUCIATUS, Curculio
Fabricius 1775, p. 129, n. 8; 180], 2, p. 434, no. 23
(Calandra)
doriae Pasc, 1885 p. 257, new synonym
Junk’s Catal. 1936, 29, 151, p. 151
Zimsen 1964, p. 198, n. 3386
THE FABRICIAN TYPES OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND COLEOPTERA 169
Holotype labels:
i, Fabricius "Cure, cruciatus Fabr. Entom.
p. 129 n, 8”
ii, BMNH “Calandra cruciatus”
li. “Crypto-rhynchus”’
Loeahty: “nova Hallandia”
Current status: unknown: Curculionidae, Cryp-
torrhynchinae.
Comment: All structures appear to be complete
though the legs are all tightly contracted and folded
inwards, there is a great deal of glue on the ventral
surface. There is no museum ‘type’ label on this
speciment although the label has the original
reference on it. In correspondence with R. J.
Thompson of the BMNH he sent the following
communication to me “‘I have compared the types of
cruciatus and Acalles doriae Pasc, and confirm that
they belong to the same species, Although doriae
stands in Ophrythyreoces in Junk’s Catalogue
(Hustache 1936), it certainly does not belong there.
In his description of Ophrythyreocis, Lea draws
special attention to the ‘‘conspicuously elevated
scutellum” (1913: p. 245) but in doriae the scutellum
is absent. Lea (idem, p. 247 note) placed doriae in
Pseudoporopterus, along with P, irrasus (idem,
p. 246). Although doriae and irrasus are probably
congeneric, [ doubt if they really belong in
Pseudoporepterus”.
CULTRATUS, Curculio
Fabricius 1775, p. 153, n. 136; 1801, 2, p. 536, n, 173
bicristatus F, 1801, 2 p, 517
Junk’s Catal. 1936, 28, 150, p. 3 (Aterpus)
Zimsen 1964, p. 219, n, 3785
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius “'Cure. cultratus Fab. Entom,
p, 153 n. 136"
ii. BMNH "“Curculio cultratus”, “Type”
Locality; “nova Hollandia™
Current status; Aferpus cultratus (F.); Cur-
eulionidae, Aterpinae.
Comment: All structures are complete, but the
ventral surface is covered with dirt, This is a well
known species. Fabricius (1775: p. 153) describes the
elytra with ‘‘tuberculis sex v. septem elevatis”’ (six to
seven elevated tubercles). The holotype has only
five distinct tubercles.
CUPREUS, Erotylus
Fabricius 1775, p. 123, n. 5; 1801, 2 p. 12, n. 1
(Cnodalon)
venereus Gmel p. 1728 (Chalcopterus)
rusticus Blkb. Mon. p. 63, 76 (Chalcopterus)
setosus Blkb, by Blair (1914: p. 489) (Chalcop-
terus)
var cupriventris Carter (Chalcopterus)
Junk's Catal. 1911, 18, 28, p. 580 (Chalcopterus)
Zimsen 1964, p. 115, n. 1801
Carter 1926, p. 160
Holotype labels:
i, Fabricius ‘‘Cnodalon cupreum Fab. Ent.
p. 123 n, 8”
The original name of Frotylus cupreus
on the label has been changed to
Cnodalon cupreum in the same handwrit-
ing. After re-examination of mare
species Fabricius must have done this
himself, As his work progressed he often
re-classified species in new genera.
ii. BMNH ‘Cnodalon cupreus’’, “type”
Locality: “nova Hollandia’’
Current status: Chaleopterus cupreus (F.); Tene-
brionidae, Amarygminae.
Comment: The condition of the holotype is good
except for the head which is retracted within the
prothorax. Only the terminal joints of the left
antenna and terminal tarsi of left metathoracic leg
are missing.
The synonyms of this species are given by Carter
(idem,) as Ch, venereus Gmel and Ch, rusticus Blk.
H. J. Carter (1913: p. 14) had some correspondence
with K. G. Blair of the BMNH about this Fabrician
species. In this reference Blair’s description of the
Fabrician type is given, Blackburn’s type of Ch.
rusticus and Ch. setasus are both in the BMNH, Blair
(1914; p. 489) published that Ch. setosus Blk. is also
a synonym. Carter (1926: p, 160), who had not seen
the types still published them as separate species,
omitting Blair’s work on this species. The full
synonymy should be as above.
This species shows great variation in colour from
deep purple, almost black with a metallic tinge
through various shades of purple with a green
metallic tinge, to reddish copper, to an emerald
green. The holotype is black with thorax and elytra
coppery,
CURVIROSTRIS, Curculio
Fabricius 1781, 1, p. 166, n, 29; 1801, 2, p, 446, n. 40
(Rhynehaenus).
Zimsen 1964, p. 201, n. 3436,
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius: *‘Curc. Curvirostris F, Sp, Ins.
N. 23". This number 23 is incorrect: it
should be 29,
ii, BMNH "Rhynchaenus— curvirostris™,
“Type”.
Locality: “nova Hollandia",
Current status; unknown. Family Curculionidae-
17u
Comment: The holotype is in poor condition;
head twisted through an angle of 90° to the left. Both
antennae and some of the legs are missing, and the
rest twisted and coyered with dirt,
R. curvirostris F. does not appear in any recent
catalogue. Olivier (1807: p. 152) described and
figures this species. As Fabricius studied more and
more species he realised that the large genus of
Curculio had to be divided up into separate genera.
This species was put in the genus Rhynchaenus in his
later publications.
CYANEUS, Hister
Fabricius 1775, p. 52, n, 3; 1801, 1, p, 86, n, 13
speciosus Boisd. 1835, p. 148
laetus Er. 1834, p. 179.
Junk’s Catal. 1910. 8, 24, p. 93 (Saprinus),
Zimsen 1964, p. 35. n. 253.
Labels; There are 3 specimens over the BMNH label
“Hister cyaneus”’.
1. i. Fabricius ‘“‘Hister cyaneus Nova Hol-
landia’”’.
ii. BMNH “Type”,
2. No labels.
3. Fabricius “Hister eyaneus C.B.S. Fab. Ent,
p- 52 n, 3”.
Locality of “Type™: “nova Hollandia”.
Locality of 3rd specimen: “C.B.S." (Cape of
Good Hope).
Current status; Saprinus cyaneus (F.): Histeridae,
Comment: Both labelled specimens are pinned
through the left elytron with a large amount of glue
on the ventral surface. The “type is complete
except for the tarsi of the right meta-thoracic leg.
The specimen labelled as from “C.B.S."" is in poor
condition with right antenna and most legs missing.
The unnamed specimen is the same species as the
“type”, so both specimens may be taken as syntypes.
The second specimen is in much the same condition
as the “type’’. These specimens were compared with
the large series in the BMNH collection of S,
cyaneus (F.). It is a species that varies a good deal in
size and colour from green to blue, also in degree
and form of striation on the elytra, In none of the
species examined was the sutural and second striae
united anteriorly, as they are in the specimen with
the “habitat” given as “C.B.8." (Cape of Good
Hope). This specimen was compared with the
specimens of S, bicolor (F.), the type of which jis in
the BMNH collection and the “C.B.S.". specimen
proved to be that species, The type of S. bicolor (F.)
of South Africa is given in Syst. El. 1801, 1 p, 86, n,
14 as being in Mus. D. de Schestedt, and the locality
is given as “C.B.S.” Jt appears then that this
specimen has been erroneously labelled Hister
cyaneus with the reference “Fab. Ent. p. 52 n. 3”
REC § AUST. MUS 18 (8): 155-197
January, L981
which is far H, cyaneus. The locality C.B.S. on the
label is correct for H. bicolor. There has abviously
been some mixing of material here. This specimen of
H. bicolor may be a syntype as the label is in
Fabricius’s handwriting-
CYANEUS, Lagria
Fabricius 1775, p. 125. n. 4: 1801, 2 p. 68, n. 5
(Dryops)
chalybeus White & (Selenepalpus)
subviridus White 2 (Selenopalpus) new synonym
Junk’s Catal. 1915, 17, 65, p. 24 (Selenopalpus)
Zimsen 1964, p. 127, n. 2026
Holotype labels;
i. Fabricius ‘‘Lagria Cyanea Fab, Entom, p.
125 n, 4"
ii, BMNH “Dryops cyanea”, “Type”
Locality; ‘nova Hollandia” is the locality given by
Fabricius and recorded as such by Zimsen. It is,
however, a New Zealand species (Broun 1880; p,
420).
Current status: (F,):
Oedemeridae
Selenopalpus cyaneus
Comment: Pin has forced the elytra apart; glue on
the ventral surface has entangled meso and
metathoracie legs; abdomen has been broken off and
glued on at a slight angle; joints of both antennae
and left maxillary palp are missing.
White's types of S. chalybeus and S, subviridus are
in the BMNH callection. 8. chalybeus is a male and
this synonymy was published by Broun (1880: p.
420), On examination S, subviridus white is found to
be the female of S. chalybeus White and is,
therefore, another synonym of 8. cyaneus (P.)
Schenkling in Junk's Catalogue published all three
as separate species, ignoring Broun’s publication,
Sclenopselophus is another generic synonym.
CYANEUS, Scarites
Fabrieius 1775, p. 249, n, 2; 1801, 1, p. 125, n. |S.
Jabriciti Westw 1842, 1, p. 8&5
var denescens Sloane 1923, p, 19.
Junk’s Catal. 1927, 1, 91, p. 451 (Lacecaprerurn)
Zimsen 1964, p. 41, n, 376
Holotype labels:
i, Fabricius “‘cyaneus”
ii. BMNH Scarites cyaneus
Locality: “nova Hollandia"
Current status: Laccepterum (F.):
Carabidae, Searitinae
cyaneum
Comments: The specimen is badly pinned through
the mid-dorsal line forcing the elytra apart. The
ventral surface is covered with glue. The left
THRE FABRICIAN TYPES OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND COLEOPTERA 71
mesothoracic leg is missing, the metathoracic leg is
detached and lying in the glue.
CYANICORNIS, Chrysomelta
Fabricius 1775, p. 99. n. 24; 1801, 1 p, 436, n. &5-
Junk’s Catal. 1916, 24, 48%, p. 200 (Phyllocharis)
Zimsen 1964, p, 99, n. 1489
Holotype labels:
i, Fabricius “Chrys. Cyanicornis Fab.
Entom. p. 99”.
ii. “Chrysomela cyanicornis”, “Type”
Locality: ‘“‘nova Hollandia”’
Current status; Phyllocharis cyanicarnis (F.)
Chrysomelidae, Chrysomelinae
Comment: The holotype is pinned through the left
élytron, the posterior half of which is missing, only
the coxa and trochanter of left mesothorae leg is
present. There are several varieties of this species.
As in the other species of this genus there is
tremendous variation in colour patterns, This
holotype has a single central prothoracic spot and
eight spots distributed over the elytra, one basal spot
and two marginal ones on each elytron, and one
central and one triangular apical spot each with half
on each elytron. Lea (1902 p. 402) suggests that this
species is a variety ot P. cyanipes (F.). It needs a
specialist in this group to decide which are valid
species and which are varieties.
CYANIPES, Chrysomela
Fabricius 1775, p. 98, n. 23: 1801, 1 p. 436 n. 84,
Junk's Catal. 1916, 24, 68, p. 201 (Phyllacharis)
Zimsen 1964, p. 99 n. 1488
Holatype label:
i. Fabricius ““Chrys. Cyanipes Fab. Entom.
Pp. 98 n. 23".
ii, BMNH “Chrysomela cyanipes” “Type”
Locality: “nova Hollandia"™
Current status: Phyllocharis
somelidae, Chrysomelinae
cyanipes. Chry-
Comment: The condition of the holotype is fair.
Left antenna and sore tarsi are missing, and there is
a large crack between the metathorax and abdomen,
also there is a great deal of glue on the ventral
surface
There are a number of colour pattern varieties
of this species listed in Junk'’s Catal (idem). Also
Baly (1855: p. 172) describes and discusses these
varieties fully. He states that the Fabrician type was
founded on a single specimen which he, Baly,
regards as an extreme variety. There are two blue
spots on each elytron in the holotype specimen, one
basal spot near the sutural angle and one slightly
posterior to it nearer the external margin, The
posterior half of the elytra is dark blue with a ramus
running up each side of the suture. There is a small
ferrugineous apical spol. This species is recorded
from New Guinea and Northern Australia.
CYANOCEPHALA,. Criaceris
Fabricius 1775, p. 121, n. 18; 1801, 1, p. 461, n. 58
antennalis Lea 1923: p. 52] and p. 543, new
synonym,
Zimsen 1964, p. 104, n. 1591,
Syntype label:
i. Fabricius “Cr. Cyanocephala Fab. Entom
p. 121 p. 18”.
ii. BMNH “Crioceris cyanucephala”’
Locality: “nova Hollandia™
Current status: Monolepra
Chrysomelidae. Galerucinae.
cyanocephala (F.)
Comment: There are two specimens on the
Fabrician Jabel, neither of which has been identified
by Waterhouse as the type, therefore both must be
regarded as syntypes. Zimsen records only one.
Both are in a very bad State of preservation, One
specimen, being badly pinned is very distorted and
the structures so twisted and superimposed on one
another, it is difficult to distinguish the characters;
both antennae are damaged. In the other specimen
the membraneous wings are unfolded and protrude
beyond the elytra, the antennae are damaged and
parts of the right one are carded. The ventral surface
is in a better condition than the previous specimen
and only the tarsi of the metathoracic legs are
missing. This isa male; the sex of the other specimen
is indiscernable.
This species has been omitted from recent
catalogues. Hope (1840: p.. 145) mentions it in his list
of Fabrician species under the original genus of
Crioceris. J, W. Wilcox does not mention it in Junk’s
Supplement 1971-74. In 1929, G. E. Bryant of the
Entomological Bureau, London, identified this
species as belongong to the genus Monolepta. T.
Blackburn (1896; p. 99) states “I have not seen any
Galerucid agreeing with the description of this
species, but it does not seem at all likely to be a true
Monolepta as its author states that the third joint of
its antenna is as long as the fourth”. On examination
of this specimens this is not the case, The second and
third joints are very small, the fourth and fifth joints
are longer and equal in size, and joints six to eleven
are longer than the second and third joints, but
shorter than four and five,
in the BMNH there are four cotypes, two males
and two females, of M. antennalis Lea, On
comparing these with M, cyanocephala (F.) they are
found to be identical. M, antennalis Lea then
172
becomes a synonym of M. cyanocephala (F.). Mrs.
8. L. Shute of the BMNH verified this synonymy.
CYLINDRIROSTRIS, Curculio
Fabricius 1775, p. 137, n. 55; 1801, 2, p, 463, n, 125
(Rhynchaenus)
innubus Herbst 1792-5, p 172-
longimanus Boisd. 1835, p. 408 (Orthorrhinus)
var. simulans Boh. 1836, p_ 245
var. laetms Saund. and Jekel 1855, p. 297
var, aspreda Pasc, L882, p, 380
var, carbonarius Pase. 1882, p. 381
var. lateralis Pasc, 1882, p, 381
vac. euchramus Fairm. 1883, p. 36
var. patreulis Pasc, 1885, p. 225
var, vagus Olliff. 1889, p, 89
var. pomicola Lea 1897, p, 624
var. albiceps Lea 1897, p. 624
var, howensis Lea unpublished,
Junk’s Catalogue 1932, 28, 122, p, 46 (Orthorrhinus)
Zimsen 1964, p. 204, n, 3491
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius “Cure. eylindrirostris
Entom. p. 137 n, 55",
iii BMNH “Rhynchaenus
“Type”
Fabr.
cylindriostris”’,
Locality: “nova Hollandia’'
Current status: Orthorrhinus cylindrirastris (F.):
Curculionidae, Hylobjinae.
Comment; Holotype is black with scattered
greyish and brownish scales, This is a cammon
species which varies considerably in size and number
of scales present. In Junk’s Catalogue O. laetus
Saund. and Jekel and O, lateralis Pasc. are listed as
separate species. Before A.M. Lea died in 1932 he
sent me a copy of his MS notes on Lord Howe Island
Coleoptera, These have not been published, In these
notes he states that both O, lateralis Pase and O,
laetus Saund. are varicties of O. cylindrirostris (F.). 1
quote from Lea's MS:—
“O. cylindrirostris Fab. var. lateralis Pasc.
Six specimens were obtained; four with white
markings conspicuous, tWo With them rather vaguely
indicated,
O. cylindrirostris, var. vagus Oll. This var. was very
abundant on freshly felled trees at night time, and
was a common victim of Cormodes darwini.
O. cylindrirostryis, var howensis Lea. a mew variety.
A large var. 14-18 mm. Scales nearly all of a
creamy whiteness except in the vicinity of the
fascicles; elytral fascicles more or less ochreous, only
the median pair very canspicuous, apical fascicles of
prothorax feeble or absent. Rostrum long and thin;
front legs long in both sexes, but in male
considerably longer than in female and the front
tarsi wide, flat, and with conspicuous fringes.
REC 5. AUST MUS 18 (8): 155-197
January, [981
Specimens of this yar, in good condition have a
curious speckled appearance owing to the abundant
granules showing through the scales; but greasy or
dirty specimens look very different. Twelve males
and seven females were obtained tn company with
specimens of the preceding var. i.e. var. vagus Oll.”
These MS notes were sent to me in December
1931. Ina covering letter to me A.M, Lea stated that
var. howensis Lea was close ta var_ laetus Saund and
Jekel fram the New Hebrides.
In the BMNH Collection under the label O, laetus
Saund and Jekel which is in Jekel’s handwriting is a
specimen with the label O. cylindrirastris (F.)
identified by A.M. Lea as var. howensis Lea. There
are 2 locality labels on this specimen, (1) Lord Howe
Is. A.M. Lea and a BMNH label, Australia. Variety
howensis Lea is therefore a variety of O.
cylindrirostris and according to Lea QO. laetus Saund
and Jekel and O. lateralis Pasc, should be cegarded
as varietics also.
DECEMPUNCTATUS, Dytiscus
Fabricius 1775. p, 232, n. 11; 1801, 1, p, 263, n. 26
ab. flavescriptus Zimmerm, 1917, p, 213
(Platynectes)
ab. lugubris Blanch. 1853, p. 49 (Platynectes)
var, masteri Macl, 1871, p. 126 (Platynectes)
var. octodecimmaculatus Macl. 1825, p. 31
(Platynectes)
var. semperi Reg. 1899, p. 285 (Platynectes)
var, spilopterus Germ, 1848, p, 172 (Platynectes)
var, variegatus Reg. 1899, p. 286 (Platynectes)
Junk's Catal, 1920, 4, 71, p. 149 (Platynectes)
Zimsen 1964, p. 68, n. 879
Zimmermann 1917-19, p. 213
Syntype labels:
i. Fabricius “‘Dytise. 10—punctatus Fab.
Entom, p. 232 n, 11”
i. BMNH “Dytiscus 10—punctatus’’,
“Type”
Locality: “nova Hollandia", This species is very
widespread and has also been recorded from the
islands of Indonesia, Philippines and New Guinea.
Current status: Platynectes decempunctatus (F.):
Dytiscidae
Comment; The condition of the “'type’’ is good,
only the left mesothoraci¢ leg and tarsal joints of the
right and left metathoracic legs are missing. This
species has a great many varieties which are
recarded ty Zimmermann in Junk’s Catalogue
(1920). Both Sharp (1882: p. 540) and Zimmermann
(1917, 1919; p, 213) give full accounts of this species.
The varieties differ mainly in the markings of the
yellow spots. The “type” has a large distinct anterior
spot on the head, one spot on each anterior angle of
the prothorax, five yellow spots on each elytron
THE FABRICIAN TYPES OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND COLEOPTERA 173
arranged in two longitudinal rows—three in the
inner row near the suture, and two outer lateral
spots situated slightly posterior to the inner anterior
and medial spot. The dorsal surface of the type is
dull, this may be due tw dirt and age. All the
specimens in the BMNH collection are shiny,
DETRITA, Coccinella
Fabricius 1775, p. 85, 9. 36: PSO, 1. p. 373, 0. 98
Yamica Newman 1842, p. 415 (Paropsis)
laesa Germ. 1848, p. 235 (Paropsis), new
synonym,
conferta Chap, 1877, p. 81 (Parcpsis)
Zimsen 1964. p. 76, 0. 1237
Holotype labels:
i, Fabricius “‘Coccin. Detrita Fab. Entom, p.
85 n, 36"
ii. BMNH “Coccinella deirita”
Locality: ‘nova Hollandia”
Current status: Paropsis
somelidae, Chrysomelinae
detriia (F.): Chry-
Comment: Condition of holotype is poor. The
insect has been broken and roughly glued together.
Parts of the antennae, the labial palps and parts of
all legs except for those of the right meso and
metathoracic legs are missing.
This species was classified as a coccinellid by
Fabricius. Hope (1840; p, 87) refers it to the genus
Paropsis but makes no further comment on it. lt does
not appear in either Gemminger et Harold's
catalogue nor in Junk’s catalogue. In 1929 G. E.
Byrant of the Entomological Bureau of London
checked this synonymy and agreed that it was the
same as.the species. P, (Chrysophtharta) laesa Germ.
(1948: p, 235). P. detrira (F.) is therefore the valid
name and P. laesa Germ is a new synonym,
Blackburn's (1899: p. 493) description of P. laesa
Germ. describes the “type” specimen of P, detrita
(F.). The above synonyms are given in Junk’s
Catalogue 1916, 24, 68, p. 164 for P. laesa Germ.
DETRITUS, Hister
Fabricius 1775, p. 53, n. 10; 1801, 1, p. 89, mn, 28
Junk’s Catal. 1910, 8, 24, p, 93 (Saprinus)
Zimsen 1964, p. 35, 0. 262
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius ‘‘Hister detritus Fab. Entom. p.
53 n, 10"
ii. BMNH “Hister detritus’, “TYPE”
Locality: “nova Hollandia”’. This is probably a
New Zealand species.
Current status: Saprinus detritus (F.): Histeridae,
Comment; The condition of the type is fair except
for the legs, one of which is entirely missing and the
others are in a bad state of preservation. There is
also a good deal of dried fungal hyphae present.
H. Bickhardt in Junk's Catalogue (idem,) lists S.
detersus \lliger, (1807: p. 365) and queries S. detritus
Rossi (1790: p. 29) as asynonym, Fabricius (1927: p
76) refers to Rossi's and Olivier’s descriptions. Rossi
was not the author of the species. Both Fabricius and
Olivicr (1789: p. 12) give “nova Hollandia’ as the
locality. The locality of S, detersus Ill. is a
Mediterranean and Western European species. R.
Staig (1931: p. 102) lists S. detritus (F.) as the species
and S. detersus (ll. as 4 synonym. He notes that in
the Fabrician reference 1787 p. 33 the specific name
is spelt as detricus, which is probably a misprint, 3.
detritus (F.) has been omitred from tecent
catalogues. On comparison of the type of S. derrints
(F,) with specimens of S. detersus El. in the BMNH
collection, it is evident that these two species are not
identical and should be regarded as two distinc?
species.
Characters of S. detritus (F.):—Head and thorax
black, elytra deep red. Head:—punctation slight and
scattered. Prothorax:—anterior margin fringed with
hairs, transverse, slightly bisinuate at base, anterior
arigles rounded but projecting, lateral and posterior
margins punctate with punctures fading out towards
centre on posterior margin, disc smooth and shiny
and under magnification very fine punctures are
visible, Elytra;—oblong, almost rectangular. slighty
swollen at humeral angle, lateral edges bent sharply
at right angles, posterior half of elytra coarsely and
densely punctate, on lateral margins punctures
extend up to two-thirds of length of elytra and reach
anterior margin between third and fourth striae,
Five striae are distinguishable in anterior half, and
first and second striae are united anteriorly. Ne
striae are distinguishable in posterior half,
Legs:—External margin of tibiae af pro- and
mesothoracic legs have four strong denticles and two
small ones at apex, The metatibiae have spines on
external margin,
Abdomen:—Ventral surface punctated, propy-
gidium and pygidium also punctated.
In the BMNH there are several unidentified
specimens from New Zealand. On comparing them
with the type of S. detritus (F,) they appear to be the
same species. It is probable therefore that the
Fabrician locality “nova Hollandia” is incorrect and
should be ‘nova Zelandia”™.
DEUSTA, Cassida
Fabricius 1775, p. 89, n. 8; 1801, 1, p. 396, n. 44
corallina Boisd 1835, p, 541
angulifera Blanch. 1853, p. 324
Junk’s Catal. 1914. 28, 62, p. 70 (Aspidomorpha)
Zimsen 1964, p 90. n- 1313
174 REC. 8. AUST. MUS [8 (8): 155-147
Syntype labels:
i. Fabricius ‘‘Cassida deusta Fab. Eniom. p.
89 yn, R
li. BMNH "Cassida deusta’ “Type”
Locality; ‘nova Hollandia™
Current status! Aspidomorpha deusta (F.): Chry-
somelidae, Cassidinae.
Comment; The “‘type’’ is in fair condition, The
terminal joints of the left antenna, the terminal larsi
of the mesothoracic legs and the left metathoracic
leg are all missing. There is a second specimen which
is cleaner than the “type” but both right meso- and
metathoracic legs and the tarsi of the left
metathoracic leg are missing.
The number of spots arranged in three longitu-
dinal rows on the elytra varies considerably in this
species, They may be absent or two or three may
unite, If present, the position of the spots remain
constant. The holotype has tive spots in the sutural
and median lines and four in the marginal line with
three of them fusing,
A, nigrodorsaia Boh., given In Junk's Catal,
(idem.) as a subspecies, has two black median spots
missing on the elytra but otherwise is in close
agreement with A. deusta (F.).
DIDYMUS Cryptocephalus
Fabricius 1775, p. 107, n. 9; T8OT, 2. p. 43, n. 11.
ab. fulvoplagiata Jac. 1884, p. 210)
Junk's Catal, 1914, 24, 59, p. 92 (Rhyparida)
Zimsen 1964, p, 122, n. 1923
ees
Syntype labels;
i, Fabricius “Crypt, didymus Fab, Entom, p,
107 n. 9”
iii BMNH “Cryptocephalus didymus"’,
“Type”
Locality: “nova Hollandia”
Current status: Rhyparida didyma (F.) Chryso-
melidae, Eumolpinae.
Comment: The “type’’ is badly damaged. Both
antennae and all legs are incomplete, postenor hulf
of right elytron is missing. There is a second
specimen but it also is in a poor condition with the
glue on the ventral surface obscuring most of the
structures, both elytra are complete.
The three spots on the eltyra may vary in size and
shape in this species, may also be united or obsolete,
Jn the “type” they are distinct, the basal spot which
Fabricius describes as ‘‘postice didyma”’ (posteriorly
divided into two) is semicircular in shape with one
branch extended towards the sutural margin and a
slight indication of a branch given off medianly
towards the outer margin, the central spot is roughly
triangular and the apical one is elongale.
January. 1Ys8T
ERYTHROCEPHALUS, Staphylinus
Fabricius 1775, p. 265, n. 6; 1801, 2, p. 593, nm. 19,
punctatus Hope
Junk’s Cutal. 1914, 5, 57, p. 398
Steel 1949, p, 57-61
Zimsen 1964, p, 231, n. 3986
Holotype labels:
i, Fabricius “‘Staph, erythraceph,
Entom, p, 265 n. 6"
ii. BMNH “Staphylinus erythrocephalus”,
“Type”
Fah,
Locality: ‘‘nova Hollandia”
Current status: Creophilus erythrocephalus (F.)
Staphylinidae, Staphyliniae
Comments; Holotype, a female, head is very
much deflexed, membraneous wings are unfolded,
terminal joints of left antenna missing and left
prothoracie leg is broken at base of tibia, The second
specimen, a female, had been identified by W. O,
Steel (idem,) as C. lania Er, It is in fair condition,
only right metathoracic leg is missing and membran-
ous wings are unfolded.
C. erythrocephalus (F.) is widely distributed
throughout Australia and is recorded from Tonga,
Tahiti and Chile, In the BMNH there is the type of
C. punctatus Hope which is marked as a synonym,
W.Q, Steel (idem,) records this and points out the
differences between C, erythrocephalus (F,) and
C, lania Er,
EXCLAMATIONIS, Curculio
Fabricius 1775, p, 133, n. 37; 1801, 2, p. 456, n. 89
(Rhynchaenus)
Zimsen 1964, p. 203, n. 3471
Holotype labels:
i, Fabricius ‘Cure, Exclamationis Fab,
Entam, p. 133 n, 37”
ii. BMNH ‘‘Rhynchaenus exclamationis’’,
“Type
Locality: ‘nova Hollandia’
Current status: unkown, Fam. Curculionidae
Comment: The holotype is badly pinned through
position of Jeft elytron which is missing, pin emerges
on ventral surface between metathorax and
abdomen so that abdomen is nearly detached from
the thorax, antennae hidden beneath rostrum; left
prothoracie leg is missing,
There is no record of this species in recent
catalogues, Olivier (1801 p. 155, £165) describes this
species but the figure ts poor and does not shaw any
detailed structure. Fabricius changed the genus in
his later publications to Rhynchaenus.
THE FABRICIAN TYPES OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND COLEOPTERA
FARINOSA, Buprestis
Fabricius 1775. p. 219, n, 16; 1801, 2, p. 195. n. 50
var. auroimpressa Cast. and Gory. 1835, p. 20
(Chrysodema)
vat, impressa Kerr, 1898, p. 118 (Cyphogasira)
var. borneensis kerr. idem, p. 251 (Cyphogastra)
Junk's Catal, 1926, 12, 84, p. 117 (Cyphogastra)
Zimsen 1964, p. 152, n, 2509
Holotype labels:
i, Fabricus ““Buprestis farinosa Fab, Entom.
p. 219 n, 16”
i, BMNE “Buprestis farinosa’, ‘Type’
Locality; “nova Tlollandia’, This Fabrician
locality is probably incorrect, This species has only
been recorded in the East Indies.
Current status: Cyphogastra farinosa(F.): Buprest-
idae, Chalcophorinae,
Comments: Holotype is pinned through the left
elytron; terminal joints of both antennae and tarsi of
left mesothoracie and both metathoracic legs are
missing: ventral surface is covered with a fine golden
powder adhering to the pubescence, There are
several specimens of this species in BMNH
collection and they are all from Java and Borneo.
Banks may have collected this specimen when the
Endeavour stopped at Batavia for repairs.
FASCIATA F., Cetonia
see STOLATA F. Cetonia
C, faseiata F. is a synonym of C. stolata F,
FELINUS Dermestes
Fabricius 1781, 1, p. 34, n. 11; 1801.1, p. 314.0. 13
Junk's Catal, 1911, 14, 33, p, 43
Zimsen 1964, p. 77. 1, LOS7
Hinton 1945, p, 296
Syntype labels:
i. Fabricius “Felinus Fabr. Mant. Ins. n, 11”
Kergulandel”
i. BMNH- “Dermestes
number ‘'63-46"
felinus’ Register
Locality; “‘Terra Diemenii” in 1781 reference,
“Kergulandel” on the label, Kergulen Island or
Land is an island in the South Indian Ocean. Cook
charted jts coast on his Third voyage before calling
in at Adventure Bay, Tasmania. Nelson, the
collector, was on hoard, It appears that Fabricius
must have thought this island was off the coast of
Tasmania.
Current status: D. felinus F. is a synonym of D.
ater Degeer (1774: p . 223): Dermestidae, Lepesme
(1939: p, 192) and Hinton (idem.) discuss this
SVnONYMy-
175
Comment: There are two specimens in the Banks
Collection, one of which has the BMNH type label.
This is in the better condition, Head is sharply
deflexed and some of the tarsi are missing. Zimsen
only records one specimen in the Banks Collection.
FESTIVA, Melolontha
Fabricius 1775, p. 36, n, 23; 1801, 2, p. 171, n. 63
festa Gmelin 1788, p. 1561 (Calonota)
munda Sharp 1876, p. 73 (Pyronota)
var laeta F. 1775, p. 36, n. 24
Junk’s Catal, 1912, 20, 47, p. 90 (Calonota)
Zimsen 1964, p. 146, n, 2390
Syntype label:
1. Fabricius “Melo. Festiva Fabr. Sp, Ins
No. 31”
i. BMNH "Melolontha festiva’, “‘Type”
Locality: “nova Zelandia”
Current status: Calonota festiva (F.):
Scarabaeidae, Melolonthinae
Comment: The “type” is in good condition, It is
pinned through the left elytron; right prothoracic leg
except for coxa, and tarsi of left metathoracic leg are
missing, There is a second specimen which is not
recorded by Zimsen, the condition of which is only
fair, it has been broken at the base of the prothorax
and then glued together, This species must have
been re-examined by Fabricius who put the later
reference 1781 on the label when compiling the list
for this publication.
There are a number of colour varieties of this
species of which Melolontha laeta F. is one.
GIGAS, Ptinus
See GRISEUS F. Anthribus
P. gigas F. is the junior homonym.
GRISEA, Saperda
Fabricius 1775, p. 186, n, 9; 1801, 2, p. 324, n. 37
heteromorpha Boisd. 1835 (Lamia)
lentus Newm. 1840, p. 12 (Xylotoles)
westwoodi Guer. 1847, p. 27 (Xylotoles)
Junk’s Catal. 1922, 23, 73, p. 3 (Xylotoles)
Zimsen 1964, p. 175, n. 2966
Syntype labels;
i. Fabricius ““Saperda Grisea Fab. Entom. p.
186 n. 9"
ii. BMNH ‘‘Saperda grisea’, “Type”
Locality: “nova Zelandia”
Current status; Xylotoles griseus (F.): Ceramby-
cidae, Lamiinae
Comment; This is a small insect, The “type”
specimen is pinned through the right elytron which it
has displaced, There ts a great deal of glue present
on both dorsal and ventral surfaces and entangling
the legs; both antennae, except for the basal joint of
the left one, and the left elytron are missing.
There is a second specimen which, is cleaner than
the “type’’ and left antenna and left elytron are
complete, but right elytron is broken and abdomen
is displaced.
Broun (1880; p, 593) attributes this species
erroneously to Westwood (1843; p, 27) and gives S,
grisea F. as a synonym. Westwood's description has
a much later date, i.e., 1843,
GRISEUS, Anthribus
Fabricius 1775, p. 63, n. | (Ptinus gigas); L801, 2.
p, 410, n, 22
gigas F. 1775 p. 63 (Ptinus)
longicornis F. 1798 Suppl., p. 160
subsp. cervinus Klug. 1833, p. 188
nigroungulatus Fahrs. 1839, p. 241
Junk’s Catal, 1929, 26, 102, p. 86 (Phloeobits)
Zimsen 1964, p. 193, n. 3297
Locality: ‘nova Hollandia”. Its known distribu-
tion is naw from New Guinea to Australia.
Current status: Phloeebius (F.)
Anthribidae,
griseus
Comment: The holotype is missing from the
collection. In the original description (1775)
Fabricius adds ‘tan proprii genesis’’, a genus of its
own, In the 1792 and 1801 publications, Fabricius
changed not only the generic but also the specific
name to Anthribus griseus. This species is now in the
genus Phloeobius (Schk. 1826: p. 36) and the valid
specific name is griseus according to the Interna-
tional Code.
GUTTATOPUSTULATA, Coccinella
Fabricius 1775, p. 87, n. 51; 1801, 1, p. 385, n. 153
Junk’s Catal. 1931-32, 16, 118, p. 32 (Epilachna)
Zimsen 1964, p. 88, n. 1273
Holotype labels:
1, Fabricius “Cocc. guttato-pustulata Fab,
Entom, p. 87 n. 51”
ii. BMNH “Coccinella guttato-pustulata”
Locality: “nova Hollandia”’
Current status: Epilachna guttatopustulata (F.):
Coccinellidae
Comment: The holotype is very dirty and there is a
great deal of glue on the ventral surface,
The species is a well known leaf-eater
176 REC, 8, AUST. MUS 18 (A): 155-197
January, [98]
HAEMORRHOIDALIS, Curculio
Fabricius 1775, p. 140, n. 71, 1801, 2, p. 484, n. 215
(Rhynchaenus)
Zimsen 1964, p. 208, n, 3567
Syntype labels:
i, Fabricius “Cure. haemorrhoidalis Fab.
Entom. p. 140 n, 71"
ii, BMNH ‘'Rhynchaenus haemor-
rohoidalis”, “Type”
Locality: “nova Hollandia™
Current status: Haplonyx haemorrhoidalis (F.)
Curculionidae, Haplonychinae.
Comment; They are two specimens, male and
female, The male has the “type” label, it is badly
pinned through left elytron, the abdomen has been
pushed out of place and lies at right angles to the
body plane; the specimen is badly abraded,
Female specimen is in good condition but is also
badly abraded,
This species has been omitted from recent
catalogues. In the BMNH there are specimens of
this species labelled Melanterius haemorrhoidalis
(F.).
Both E, C, Zimmermann of C.§.1,R.O. Canberra
and R. T. Thompson of BMNH (pers, comm,) place
this species in the genus Haplonyx.
HIRTA, Saperda
Fabricius, 1775, p. 184, n. 4; 1801, 2, p. 320, n, 13
(S. villosa)
villosa F. 1801
Junk’s Catal, 1912, 22, 39, p. 115 (Oemona)
Zimsen 1964, p. 174, n, 2945
Syntype labels:
i, Fabricius “Saperda hirta Fab, Entom p.
184 n. 4”
ii. BMNH “‘Saperda hirta’, “type"’
Label of 2nd specimen; BMNH “‘Saperda villosa
F.. Syst. El.”
Locality; ‘nova Zelandia”
Current status: Oemona hirta (F,); Cerambycidae,
Cerambycinae.
Comment: The ‘‘type” is a male, its condition 1s
fair, terminal joints of both antennae, right
prothoracic Jeg except for coxa, tarsi of left
prothoracic leg and both metathoracic legs are
missing, The second specimen is a female, its
condition is poor and it is badly rubbed, It has the
BMNH label ''Saperda villosa F, Syst. El.” This
labelling indicates that this was labelled when the
collection was arranged in the order given in the
Systema Eleutheratorum, as in that reference
Fabricius gives the specific name as villosa and hirta
THE FABRICIAN TYPES OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND COLEOPTERA 177
as the synonym as nov, nom., as he considered the
name was preoccupied. He had used the specific
name of hirta for a second species of Saperda,
described first in 1792, p, 317, the locality of which is
given as Italy. The New Zealand species however, is
the senior homonym and therefore is the valid name
for this specimen and villosa is the synonym. There
is a large series in the BMNH of this species, and it
shows great variation in size. Broun (1880; p, 570
and p. 1275) gives a detailed description of it.
However, the type differs from this description as it
has a smooth vertex, a dense patch of bright yellow
hairs in the emarginate portion of the eye and
another posterjor to the eye, There 1s no indication
of a smooth dorsal line on the prothorax. Also there
is no pubescence along the dorsal line, but this may
be due to rubbing. The elytra are also devoid of
hairs,
HOLLANDIAE F., Scarabaeus
See NOVABHOLLANDIAE, F., Scarabaeus
INAEQUALIS, Coccinella
Fabricius 1775, p, 80, n. 8: 1801, 1, p, 362, n. 40
Junk’s Catal. 1931-32, 16, 120, p. 292 (Coelophora)
Zimsen 1964, p. 84, n. 1197
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius “Cocc, inaequalis Fab. Entom,
p. 80 n, 8"
i. BMNH “Coccinella inaequalis’, “Type”
Locality: “nova Hollandia”
Current status: inaequalis (F.):
Coccinellidae
Coelophora
Comment: Condition of “type”’ is fair. It has been
pinned twice through the right elytron. The ventral
surface is covered with dirt and dried hyphae, rhe
antennae are missing. There are a number of
varieties recorded for this Species in Junk’s
Catalogue (idem.). The Fabrician type is taken as
the typical structure and is described fully by
Mulsant (1850; p.404), The large series in the
BMNH collection show considerable variation of
markings on thorax and elytra, This species has a
wide distribution from Japan and China, through the
Malay Archipelago to Tasmania.
INTERRUPTA, Cassida
Fabricius 1775, p. 89, n. 7, 1801, 1, p. 395, n. 40
plasoni Spaeth, 1898, p. 539 (Aspidomorpha)
var badeni Wgenr. (Aspidomorpha)
var planipennis Blkb. (Aspidomorpha)
Junk’s Catal, 1914, 25, 62, p. 71 (Aspidomorpha)
Zimsen 1964, p. 90, n. 1309
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius “Cassida interrupta Fab. Entom.
p. 89 n. 7”
ii. BMNH “Cassida interrupta”’
Locality; “nova Hollandia™
Current status; Aspidomorpha interrupta (F.)
Chrysomelidae, Cassidinae
Comment: The holotype is complete except for
the terminal joints of the right antenna. The legs are
covered in dried mycelial hyphae.
The black markings on the elytra of this species
varies as to degree and arrangement.
INTERRUPTUS, Curculio
Fabricius 1781, p. 188, n, 148; 1801, 2, p, 519, n, 70
obliquesignatus Boh. (842, p. 244
griseus White 1846, p. 14 (Otiarhynchus)
apicalis Broun 1881, p. 701 (Empaeotes); loc.
cit. 1893, p. 118 (Platyomida)
Zimsen 1964, p. 214, n. 3701
Kuschel 1969, p. 789 and pp, 792-5 (Catopres)
Lectotype (Kuschel) labels:
i. Fabricius “Curcul
Ins. n. 148
ii, BMNH “Curculio Interruptus’, “type”
Interruptus Fabr. Sp-
Locality: Fabricius recorded this specimen from
“nova Hollandia’’.. This has proved incorrect as it 1s
from New Zealand (Kuschel idem,).
Current status: Catoptes interruptus (F.): Cur-
culionidae, Leptopiinae
Comment: There aré two specimens in the
Collection. The one that originally had Water-
house's “type” label is in very poor condition having
metathoracic legs and abdomen missing, The
“second specimen” is in better condition and has
only right metathoracic leg missing, Glue obscures
the ventral surface. This specimen is a male and has
been designated by Kuschel (idem, ) as the lectotype
and a Jabel as such has been added to the specimen
by R. T. Thompson of the BMNH, The former
“type” specimen Kuschel now designates as a
paralectotype (1970; p, 204),
There is a female specimen in Fabricius’s own
collection which Kuschel designates as a paralec-
torype (Kuschel 1970: p. 204).
G. A, K. Marshall (1944; p, 73) transferred all
New Zealand Catoptes species from the sub-family
Eremninae to the sub-family Leptopiinae.
JESUITA, Apate
Fabricius 1775, p. 54, n, 3; 1801, 2, p. 380, n. §
canarii Nordl. 1880 App., p. 66
Junk’s Catal, 1938, 10, 161, p, 39 (Bostrychopsis]
Zimsen 1964, p. 186, n. 3175
178
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius ‘‘Apate Jesuita Fab. Entom. p.
54 n. 3"
ii. BMNH “‘Apate jesuita”
Locality; “nova Hollandia™
Current status: Bostrychopsis jesuita (F.): Bos-
trychidae
Comment: Only the metathorax and abdomen of
the holotype is left and neither metathoracic leg is
complete.
There is another specimen in Fabricius’s own
collection, now at the Zoological Museum in
Copenhagen, This is a well known species and is
widely distributed throughout North and South
Australia, New South Wales and Victoria, The
colour is usually uniformly black, but some
specimens may be reddish,
LAETA, Melolontha
Fabricius 1775, p. 36, n. 24; 1801, 2, p. 171, n, 64
Junk’s Catal, 1912, 20, 47, p. 90 (Calonata)
Zimsen 1964, p, 146, n, 2391
Holotype labels:
i, Fabricius ‘‘Melol, laeta Fabr. Sp. Ins. n.
32”
ii. BMNH ‘‘meloiontha laeta’’, ‘‘type”’
Locality: “nova Zelandia”
Current status: Calonota laeta (F.) is a variety of
C. festiva (F.); Scarabaeidae, Melolonthinae.
Comment: The condition of the holotype is fair,
both antennae except for two basal joints, tarsi of
left prothoracic and right metathoracic legs are
missing.
This is a colour variety of C. festiva F, It is a pink
opalescent colour with red thoracic stripe and red
scutellum. Fabricius must have re-examined this
species before publishing in 1781 and put this later
reference on the label,
LAEVICOLLIS, Silpha
Fabricius 1775, p, 73, n. 7; 1801, 1, p. 338, n. 8
reticulatus Haag 1878, p. 659 (Saragus)
Junk’s Catal. 1910-11 , 18, 28, p. 424 (Saragus)
Zimsen 1964, p. 80, n. 1117
Carter 1926, p. 142
Holotype labels:
i, Fabricius ‘'Silpha laevicollis Fab. Entom.
p. 73 n. 7”
ii. BMNH “Silpha laevicollis”
Locality; ‘‘nova Hollandia”™
Current status: Celibe laevicollis (F.): Tene-
brionidae, Ulominae
REC. & AUST. MUS 18 (8): 155-197
January, LIST
Comment: The holotype is in good condition, only
a few tarsi and the right metathoracic leg are
missing.
Schenkling in Junk's Catalogue (idem.) incor-
rectly attributes this species to Olliff, but Carter
(idem.) corrects this. This species was formally
classified in the genus Saragus; Watt (1968; p, 36)
made Saragus a synonym of the genus Cellbe.
LAEVIGATUM, Opatrum
Fabricius 1781, 1, p. 90, m. 4; 1801, 1, p. 117, n. 8.
?mauritanicus F, 1792, p. 113 (Tenebrio)
piceus Ol, 1792, p. 50
Joryzae Herbst 1799, p, 18
picipes Steph, 1832, p. 11 (Alphitobius)
granivorus Muls. et God, 1868, p.
(Alphitobius)
striatulus Fairm, 1869, p, 231 (Cartaphronetis)
rufipes Mad. 1872, p. 286 (Microphyes)
Zimsen 1964, p. 39, n. 334
Carter 1926, p. 137
288
Syntype label;
i, Fabricius “Opatrum Jaevigatum Fab. Sp.
Ins, n. 4 Hab, in Nova Zel”
iii BMNH ‘‘Opatrum laevigatum"
There are two specimens under this label, the
“type™ specimen has the Fabrician label
Locality: ‘nova Zelandia”’
Current status: Alphitobius laevigatus
Tenebrionidae, Ulominae.
(F.);
Comment: The condition of the “type” js fair, the
legs are bunched together and tarsi are missing. This
species is not listed by H. Gebien in Junk’s
Catalogue (1910, 18, 15, p. 458) but the synonym
Microphyes rufipes Macl. is. This synonymy was
identified by Blair (1914: p. 486), The synonyms of
this species are listed in Junk’s Catalogue as
synonyms of A. piceus Ol. The distribution of this
species is now known to be cosmopolitan.
LEONINA, Coccinella
Fabricius 1775, p. 87, n. 54; 1801, 1, p. 384, n. 160.
tasmanii White 1846, 11. p. 23 (tasmaniae)
Junk’s Catal. 1931-32, 16, 120, p. 508.
Zimsen 1964, p. 88, n,. 1279
Syntype labels:
(i) Fabricius “Cocc. leonina Fab. Entom.
p. 87 n. 54”
(Gi) BMNH “Coccinella leonina"™, “Type”
Locality: "nova Hollandia’’. It is doubtful if this
Fabrician locality is correct. Both Mulsant (1850: p.
128) and Schenkling in Junk’s Catalogue (idem,)
give the locality as New Zealand. Out of twenty
specimens in the BMNH collection seventeen have
IHE FABRICIAN TYPES OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND COLEOPTERA
locality labels as New Zealand. Gemminger et
Harold and Masters Catalogues both give the
Fabrician locality,
Current status: Coccinella leonina F.: Cocci-
nellidae.
Comment: The “type” is in a very poor condition.
It has been badly pinned and the specimen is
covered with dried fungal hyphae. There is a second
specimen which is in much the same condition,
The specimen in the BMNH Collection of the
synonym C. tasmanii White is labelled “Coccinella
Tasmanii White, Zool. Ereb. and Terror'’ (1846:
p. 23). The habitat of this specimen is labelled New
Zealand, This is probably White’s type specimen
although it is not labelled as such, In Junk's
Catalogue this synonym is incorrectly spelt as
‘Tasmaniae’,
LIMBATUS Dermestes
Fabricius 1781, 1, p. 66, n. 23; 1801, 1, p, 318, n. 36
atomaria Pase, 1875, p. 210-223
discoidea Pase. 1875, p, 210-223.
Zimsen 1969, p. 78, n, 1076
Crowson 1964, p, 313 (Phycosecis)
Syntype labels:
(i) Fabricius “‘Dermestes limbatus Fabr. Sp.
Ins. n, 23"
(ii) BMNH ‘*Phycosecis limbatus” “Type”
Locality: "nova Zelandia”
Current status: Phycosecis limbata (F.): Phyco-
secidac.
Comment: The “type” is in a very dirty condition,
so thar it is difficult to determine its structures,
especially those of the legs. It is a very small insect
and has been pinned through the suture. The head is
deflexed sharply. Head is black, main body dark
brown and lateral margins of elytra pale testaceous,
Prothorax as broad as long, rounded, posterior
angles obsolete and anterior angles very acute.
Elytra twice length of prothorax, pubescence scanty,
punctate and striate. This species is not recorded in
Junk’s Catalogue, in Broun’s manual of New
Zealand Coleoptera, nor in Huttons Index Faunae
Novae Zealandiae. There is a second specimen, It is
in a worse state of preservation than the “type”.
LINEATUM, Callidium
Fabricius 1775, p. 189, n, 10; 1801, 2, p, 340, n. 40
australis Gmel, 1790, p. 1849
Junk’s Catal. 1912, 22, 39, p. 488 (Navomorpha)
Zimsen 1964, p. 179, n. 3036
Holotype labels;
i. “Callid. lineatum Fab, Entom. p. 189 n.
10"
ii, “Callidiam lineatum’”’, “Type”
179
Locality; “nova Zelandia’. Fabricius in 1801
erroneously published the locality as “nova Hol-
landia’’. In 1775 the locality is correctly given as
“nova Zelandia”’.
Current status: Navomorpha
Cerambycidae, Cerambycinae.
lineata (F.):
Comment: The holotype is in good condition, only
most of the right antenna, and left metathoracic leg
are missing. See Broun (1880: p. 590) for detailed
desenption of the species. In Gemminger et Harald
Catalogue (1873; p. 2984) the genus is spelt
Naomorpha,
LINEATA, Lagria
Fabricius 1775, p. 124, n. 3; 1801, 2, p. 68, n, 4
(Dryops)
Junk’s Catal, 1915, 17, 65, p. 33 (Sessinia)
Zimsen 1964, p. 127. n, 2025
Syntype labels:
i. Fabricius “‘Lagria lineata Fab. Entom p
124 n. 3",
ii, BMNH “Dryops lineata’, '"Type”™
Locality: “nova Zelandia”’
Current status: Sessinia lineata (F.);
Ocedemeridae,
Comment: The “type” is a female and is in a good
state of preservation. the antennae except for basal
joint of left antenna and right methatoracic leg are
missing. There is a second specimen, it is not in a
good condition; it is pinned through the left elytron
4s of which is missing, together with both prothoracic
légs; not one leg is complete. This species has been
recorded under a number of different genera.
Fabricius put it in the genus Dryops in his later
publications. It has also been recorded in the
following genera Oedemera (Ol. 1794: p, 6),
Sclenopselaphus (Gemm, et Har, Cat, 1870: p. 2168)
and Thelyphassa (Blair 1920: p. 153)
LINEOLA F.,, Coccinella
See STRIOLA F,, Coccinella
C. lineola F. is a junior homonym
LINEOLA, Curculio
Fabricius 1775, p. 136, n. 48; 1801, p. 503, n. 28
(Lixus)
Zimsen 1964, p, 211, n, 3631
Syntype labels:
i, Fabricius ‘‘Curc. lineala Fab, Entom, p,
136 n, 48”
ii. BMNH “Lixus lineola”, "Type"
Locality: ‘nova Hollandia’’
180) REC, S. AUST, MUS 18 (8); 155-197
Current status: Cossonideus lineolus (F.): Cur-
culionidae, Cossoninae,
Comment: There are two specimens in the
Collection, Zimsen records only one. The specimen
with the type” label is in very poor condition; head
and prothorax are intact, but posteriorly it is very
badly damaged, only a few remnants of abdomen
and elytra remain, The second specimen is in a
better condition, only elytra are missing. This
species is not listed in Junk’s Catalogue. In
discussion with EF. C, Zimmermann of C.S.1,R.0.,
Canberra, he placed this species in the genus
Cossonideus,
LURIDUS, Curculio
Fabricius 1775, p, 138, n. 63; 1801, p. 470, n. 155
(Rhynchaenus)
fulginosus Boh, 1835, p, 431 (Crypterrhynchus)
immansuetus Boh. 1837, p. 328 (Acalles)
plinthoides Pasc, 1871. p. 199 (Omydaus)
Junk’s Catalogue 1936, 29, 151, p. 163 (Omydaus)
Zimsen. 1964, p. 205, n. 3514
Lea 1918, p, 272
Holotype labels:
j. Fabricius ‘Cure. luridus Fab, Entom., p.
138 n. 63”,
li, BMNH “Rhynchaenus luridus”, ‘type’,
Locality; “nova ‘‘Hollandia™
Current status; Omydaus luridus (F.): Cur-
culionidae, Cryptorrhynchinae
Comment; The holotype is badly abraded, there
being no scales present: tarsi of right prothoracic leg
and left mesothoracic leg, and the right metathoracic
leg are missing.
This species has at times been placed in various
genera (Lea idem.), It is now listed in the genus
Omydaus.
LYNCEA, Saperda
Fabricius 1775, p. 185, n. 8; 1801, 2, p. 323, n, 35
Junk’s Catal, 1922, 23, 73, n. 3 (Xyotales) ,
Zimsen 1964, p. 175, n, 2964
Holotype labels:
i, Fabricius “Saperda lyncea Fab, Entom.
p 185 n. 8”
ii. BMNH “Saperda lyncea’’, *‘Type”’
Locality: “nova Zelandia”’
Current status: Xyotoles lynceus (F.): Ceramby-
cidae, Laminae.
Comment: The condition of the holotype is poor;
head is covered in dirt; neither anterinae is
complete, and every leg has parts missing; ventral
surface is covered in glue. In the copy of Broun's
Manual in the BMNH on p. 593 Dr. Gahan has
Jartidry, 198]
made a note that White's description (1846; p, 22)
which Broun followed “refers ta X. humeratus
Bates, the Fabrician species being wrongly identified
by him". Broun does quote a description given by
Bates after he, Bates, had examined the Fabrician
type, and this is the correct description of X. lynceus
(F.). X. lynceus (F.) is larger than either X. griseus
(F.) or X. humeratus Bates, It is elongate, narrow,
sides are nearly parallel along most of entire length
of insect, tapering at the apices of elytra;
ferruginous, head and prothorax are slightly darker
than the rest; prothorax is longer than wide,
margined anteriorly, and postetiorly reticulose with
an indication of an horizontal anterior and posterior
depression; base of elytra is not wider than the
prothorax, elytra striate with large scattered
punctures on the anterior half, more concentrated
towards the base, apices produced and divaricate.
MEDITABUNDUS, Curculio
Fabricius 1775, p, 139, n. 64; 1801, 2, p. 473, n. 169
(Rhynchaenus)
monachus Boisd. 1835, p. 430 (Cryptorrhyn-
chus)
Junk's Catalogue 1936, 29, 151, p. 241 (Euthyrhinus)
Zimsen 1964, p. 206, n, 3526
Holotype labels:
i, Fabricius. “Cure. meditabundus Fab.
Entom, p, 139 n, 64"
ii BMNH “Rhynchaenus meditabundus”,
“Type”
Locality: “nova Hollandia’”’
Current status: Euthyrhinus meditabundus (F.):
Curculionidae, Cryptorrhynchinae
Comment: Holotype is in good condition; it has
been pinned twice, now through the right elytron but
previously through mid-basal line of prothorax.
Some authors have spelt the genus Euthyrrhinus.
Schénherr who named and described the genus
(1837; p, 371) spelt it with only one “r’’, This species
is widely distributed throughout the Pacific Islands,
MELANOCEPHALA, Crioceris
Fabricius 1775, p. 119, n, 8; 1801, 1, p. 450, n, 7
Junk's Catal, Suppl. 1973 78, 3, p. 445 (Synodita)
Zimsen 1964, p, 102, n. 1544
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius “Crioc, meélanocephala Fab,
Entom. p. 119 n. 8"
ii, “Crioceris melanocephala"', “Type”
Locality: “nova Hollandia”’
Current status: Synodita melanocephala (F,):
Chrysomelidae, Galerucinae.
Comment: The condition of the holotype is poor:
glue obscures much of the ventral surface, The right
THE -FABRICIAN TYPES OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND COLEOPTERA 18]
antenna, parts of the left antenna and metathoracic
legs, half of the elytron and the abdomen are
missing, J, A, Wilcox gives a full list of references in
Junk’s Catal. Suppl, (idem,). The colour of the
elytra of this species varies from metallic green-blue
to violet-blue. The elytra of the holotype is violet-
blue, but rather faded with age.
MINUTA, Apate
Fabricius 1775, p. 54, n. 4; 1801, 2, p. 383, nm. 25
substriatus Staph 1839, p. 352
vertens Walk. 1859, p, 260
siculus Baudi 1873, p. 336
bifoveolatus Zoufal 1894, p. 42
aponicus Matsum. 1915, p. 184
Junk’s Catal, 1938, 10, 161, p. 24
Zimsen 1964, p, 187, n. 3192
Locality: “nova Zealand”
Current status: Dinoderus minutus (F.): Bos-
trychidae
Comment: Specimen under this label in the
Bank's Collection is not Apale minuta F. but is a
species of Sinoxylon, C, Waterhouse recognised this
was not the type of A, minutus F, and has added a
label “This cannot be the type.”” There is no
specimen of this species in Broun’s collection but
there is a space left for it, P, Lesne (1897: p. 329) in
his revision of this group records this species as being
cosmopolitan but does not record New Zealand as
one of the countries where it has been found. There
is a large series in the BMNH showing its wide
distribution.
MINUTUM, Anobium
Fabricius 1781, 1, p. 72, 9. 8: 1781 Spec. Ins. App.,
pr. 499. n, 13-14 (Lagria), 1792, 2, p. 81, n. 17
(Lagria), 1801, 2, p. 74, n. 12 (Dasytes)
subcyanens Broun L880. p. 328 (Dasyles) new
synonym.
Junk’s Catal. 1937, 10. p 75 (Dasytes)
Zimsen 1964, p, 129, n, 2051
155
w~)s
Syntype labels:
i, Fabricuis ~“Lagria Minuta Fabr. Sp. Ins.
App. p. 499 n, 13-14”
ii. BMNH “Dasytes minula’, “Type”
Locality: **nova “#elandia”
Current status: Dasytes minutus F. Melyridae
(Dasytidae)
Comment: The “type” is in very poor condition,
pinned through the left elytron, structures appear to
be complete bur the specimen is very dirty and
covered with mycelium, The second specimen is also
pinned through the left elytren and is badly damaged
with head and prothorax missing. The Fabricius
reference on the label is not recorded by Pic in
Junk’s Catalogue nor by Zimsen. It appears that
When compiling the Species Insectorum Fabricius
put this species into the genus Anobium, then,
presumably after re-examination changed the genus
to Lagria and published this in the Appendix. In
1792 he still published it under the genus Lagria but
in 1801 put it in the genus Dasytes, the genus in
which it is how stands, Pie (idem.) records D, minuta
F. with the earliest reference but gives the incorrect
page number of 79 which should be 72. Page 79 is the
reference for the species Sphaeridium minuia F, D,
minuta F, does pot appear in Broun's manual
(1880), norin Hutton's Index Fauna Novae Zelandia
(1904). Broun (1880 p. 328) describes D, subcyaneus
as anew species, This account decribes the Fabrician
type of D. minuta F, and on camparison D,
subcyaneus Broun proves to be a synonym of DB.
minuta F, Pic. (idem.) lists them as separate spectes,
MINUTUM, Callidium
Fabricius 1775 p. 192 n. 23; 1801, 2 p. 346, n. 2
(Clytus)
exiguum Gmel, 1788 p. 1852, (Zorion)
fabricianum Westw. (Obrium) 1845, p, 28,
Junk’s Catal. 1912, 22, 39, p. 156 (Zorion)
Zimsen 1964, p. 180, n. 3061,
Holotype labels:
i, Fabricius ‘‘Callid Minutum Fab. Entom p
192, n, 23"
ii, BMNH “Clytus minutus’, “Type
Locality: “nova Zelandia™
Current status: Zorion minutum (F.): Ceram-
bycidae, Cerambycinae
Comment; The holotype is badly damaged, right
elytron is almost detached, except for 3 basal joints
of left antenna and abdomen are missing, and right
metathoracic leg is detached. See Broun (1880:
p. 584) for detailed description, Fabricius himself re-
classified this specimen in 1801 into the genus
Clytus.
MODESTA, Curculio
Fabricius 1781, p. 186, n, 138; 1801, 2.p. 512. n 30
brevipennis Brotin 1880, 1, p. 438 (Cecyropa)
maritima Broun 1880, 1, p. 438 (Cecyropa)
alba Broun 1881, 2, p. 698 (Cecyrepa)
varia Broun L881, 2, p, 698 (Ceeyropa)
albicans Sharp 1886, 2, 3 p. 416 (Cecyropa)
macularia Broun 1886, 4, p. 961 (Cecyropa)
lineifera Broun 1903, 7, 12 p. 72 (Cecyropu)
alternata Broun 1904, 7, 14, p, 10S (Cecyropa)
dicors Broun 1904, 7, 14, p. 106 (Cecyropa)
striatella Broun 1917, 1, 5, p. 399 (Cecyropa)
jucunda Broun 1917, 1, 5, p. 400 (Cecyropa)
laticollis Broun 1917, 1, 5, p. 400 (Cecyrapa)
182
Zimsen 1964, p, 213. n, 3670
Kuschel 1969, p, 789 and p. 807; 1970, p. 205
(Ceeyropa)
Holotype labels:
i, Fabricius “Cure. Modestus Fabr. Sp. Ins
no. 138”
ii, BMNH “Curculio modestus”, “Type"
Locality; ‘nova Zelandia”’
Current status: Ceeyropa modesta (F,); Cur-
culionidae, Rhyparosominae
Comment; Holotype a male, is very dirty; parts of
all legs are missing. This species was omitted from
recent catalogues, G, Kuschel describes and
discusses this species and its synonyms fully. Zimsen
records that there are 2 specimens in BMNEI. There
is only one, therefore it is the holotype,
MONTICOLA, Melolontha
Fabricius 1775, p. 39, n. 38; 1801, 2, p, 184, n. 138
Junk’s Catal. 1912, 20, 47. p. 96 (Liparetrus)
Zimsen 1964, p. 150, n. 2460
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius ‘‘Melol. monticola Fabr. Sp. Ins.
n. 67"
ii, BMNH ‘Melolontha monticola’, Type”
Locality: “nova Hollandia”
Current status: Liparetrus monticolus (F.);
Scarabaeidae, Melolonthinae,
Comment: The condition of the holotype is fair;
but for the legs which are missing except for a few
remains lying in the glue. In Junk's Catalogue Dalla
Torres records this Fabrician species, but all earlier
references until Macleay’s publication in 1886, query
the author of this species, though there is a labelled
“type” specimen in the Banks’ Collection. Blackburn
(1905: p, 315) states that the two badly broken
specimens in the Macleay Museum labelled as
“monticola Fab.” are incorrectly labelled. The
specimens are two distinct species and one is labelled
elsewhere in the same collection as L. atriceps Macl.
and are not L. monticolus (F.), There are two
specimens labelled L. atriceps Macl, in the BMNH
but these are distinct from the Fabrician type L.
monticolus (F.), L. monticolus (F.) is smaller than L.
sylvicolus (Fab.), but they are closely related,
punetation on prothorax and striation and punctua-
tion on elytra is very similar. This species must have
been re-examined by Fabricius as the label has the
later reference 1781.
MORIO, Chrysamela
Fabricius 1787, 1, p. 66, n. 2; 1801, 1, p. 424, n, 5
Junk’s Catal. 1924, 24, 68, p, 161 (Paropsisterna)
REC, §.. AUST, MUS 18 (8): 155-197
January, LYS]
Zimsen 1964, p. 96. n. 1425
Syntype labels:
i. Fabricius “Chr, Morio Fabr, Mant. Ins.
n, 2”
i, BMNET “Chrysomela mario”, “Type”
Loeality: “terra Diemenii”’
Current status: Parapsisterna mario (F.), Chry-
somelidae Chrysomelinae
Comment: The condition of the “type’’ is fair.
parts of the antennae and tarsi of the right
metathoracie leg, which is detached and lying in the
glue, are missing. There is a second specimen which
is in very good condition, all parts are complete, In
this species there is a good deal of colour variation
from pitch black to dark lerruginous or reddish, The
type is black with brownish antennae, while the
second specimen has a reddish colouration,
Specimens from New South Wales, Tasmania and
South Australia in the large series in the BMNH
collection show the same variation in colour, They
also show variation in the punctation of the elytra. Tt
is possible that there is more than one species or
variety under this label. Blackburn (1898; p, 225)
describes this species in detail but states that the
punctures on the elytra ‘‘are fine, finer than those of
P. rubrosignata Boh. and P. sexpustulata Marsh. P.
rubrosignata Boh. is now regarded as a synonym of
P. beta Newm. Tn the Fabrician type, however, the
punetures are stronger and coarser than in either of
those species.
MORIO, Erotylus
Fabricius 1775, p. 123, n. 4; 1801, 2, p, 19. n. 14
(Cistela)
fovea-seriaius Fairm. 1877 p, 187 (Amarygmus)
curvipes Geb, (alienus BIK, nom, praeaece, 1893
p. 89 and 93) A’narygmus)
var, uniformis Blk. 1889, p. 1272 and 1893, p, 93
(Amarygmus)
var, fasmanicus Blk. 1893, p. 105 (Amarygnius)
Zimsen 1964. p. 117, n, 1825
Carter 1913, p. 37 and 1926, p. 158
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius “Erotylus morio Fab. Entom. p,
123 n, 4”
ii, BMNH “Cistela morio”, Type”
Locality: “nova Hollandia”
Current status: Amarygmus morio (F ); Tene-
brionidae, Amarygminae.
Comment; The holotype is in a poor state of
preservation, It has been broken between the pro
and mesothorax and glued together again: glue
obscures most of the ventral surface; all legs, except
for the left metathoracic leg, are damaged and parts
THE FABRICIAN TYPES OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND COLEOPTERA
missing. Carter (1913, p. 6) discusses the synonymy
of this species and on page 35 he quotes a letter from
Blair of the BMNH describing how the Fabrician
type was so dirty the colouration was completely
obscured but after cleaning the true colours were
revealed, Fabricius (1775; p. 123) describes the
colour as ‘ater’ (dull black), this must have been
due to the dirty state of the specimen which he must
have described without cleaning it, This species as
Carter notes was omitted from the catalogues,
MYSTACINA, Hispa
Fabricius 1775, p- 70, mn. 1; 1801, 1, p. 328, nm. 1
(Prilinus)
Junk’s Catal, 1925, 11, 81, p. 6 (Rhipicera)
Zimseo 1964, p. 79, n. 1102
Holotype labels;
i. Fabricius “Ptil. Mystacinus” written on the
underside af the label. “Derm. navalis
Fab. Entom. p. 56 9" was originally
written on the label but has been crossed
out, The writing on both sides of the
label is the same and appears to be that
of Fabricius,
ii, BMNH “Ptilinus mystacinus’” and the
register number 63-46,
Locality: “nova Hollandia”
Current status!
Rhipiceridae,
Rhipicera mystacina (F.):
Comment: Holotype is in good condition, most of
the left antenna is missing and also tarsi of the left
metathoracic leg, This was one of the specimens
Fabricius must have re-examined during his Jater
visit to London, By then, he had studied many more
species and had created new egencra as his
knowledge of insects increased, Therefore we find
that this species is no longer in the genus Hispa but is
put in the genus Ptilinus and is published as such in
1801. How the label of Dermestes nabalis F. came to
be on this specimen we do not know, As the "type"
of D. navalis F. was evidently missing when
Fabricius made his last study of the Banks
Collection, he meant only to use this label
temporarily When he changed the generic name of
H. mystacinus F.
NAVALIS, Dermestes
Fabricius 1775, p, 546, n. 9; 1801, 1 p. 155, n, 23
(Lyctus)
Junk’s Catal, 1910-11, 18 28, p, 395 (Tribolium)
Zimsen 1964, p. 48. n. 497
Locality: “nova Zelandia”
Comment: Zimsen records “'D, navalis in Nova
Hollandia, Mus D, Banks, type lost’, The 1775
reference is given in which the habitat is “nova
Ib3
Zelandia”. Zimsen records that D. navalis F. is a
synonym of Tenebrio ferrugineus F. the locality of
which fs given as ‘African aequinoctali” and the
type as being in Mus. Dom. Banks.”
In the Fabricius reference 1801, 1, p. 155 n. 23 for
Trogosita ferruginea there are fwo synonyms
listed—~Ips festacea Ent, Syst, Suppl, p. 179 n. 14 and
Lyetus navalis Ent. Syst. 1, 2 p. 504 n. 10 and the
“habitat ts piven as “India utrague’, In Junk's
Catalogue (idem) Tenebrio ferrugineus F. is listed
under the generic name of Tribolium with the
reference Mant. Ins. 1787, 1 p. 212. Zimsen gives an
earlier reference still for this species, Spec, Ins.
1781, Lp. 324. In Junk’s Catalogue T. navale Herbst
(1792: p, 138) 1s listed as a synonym of T, ferrugineus
F., but in the index of the catalogue T. navalis is
correctly attributed to Fabricius. K, G, Blair (1913;
p. 222) proposed the generic name of Triboloides for
T. ferrugineus F,
The “Type"' of D. navalis F. has recently been
found jn the Hunterian Collection in Glasgow. It is
in # poor state of preservation and is carded in a
larged amount of glue. See Introduction (p. 157),
NIGRICORNIS, Chrysomela
Fabricius 1775, p. 98, n. 20; 1801, lL. p. 435, n. 79
Junk’s Catal, 1924, 24, 68, p, 201 (Phyllocharis)
Zimsen 1964, p. 99, n. 1485
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius “Chrys. Nigricornis Fab, Entom.
p. 98, n. 20".
ii, BMNH “Chrysomela nigricornis”, “Type”
Locality: “‘nova Hollandia”’
Current status: Phyllecharis
Chrysomelidae, Chrysomelinae,
nigricornis (F.):
Comment; The condition of the “type ” specimen
is fair, It has been pinned twice through the right
elytron which is cracked. The antennae are missing
except for the basal joint of the right one, the left
metathoracic leg is also missing. The condition of the
second specimen is much the same as that of the
“type” only the left antenna is complete, and the left
not the right metathoracic leg is missing, There is 4
marked Variation inh eolour and size of the
ferrugineous spots in this species, The ‘type’ is
brassy-black; head ferrugineous with a black trontal
patch. antennue black: thorax brassy-black with
ferrugineous lateral margins; elytra finely punctu-
ated, brassy-black with two ferrugineous humeral
spots placed obliquely; abdomen blue-black, base
and apex ferrugineons, Baly (1855; p, 175) in his
discussion of this genus described a new species P.
cyannipennis, but realised that it was “very closely
allied’ to P. nigricornis (F.). Baly's type in the
BMNH Collection is labelled P. nigricornis (F.)
thd REC. S AUST. MUS I8 (8): 155-197
Weise in Junk’s Catal, (idem) lists P, cyannipennis
Baly as a variety of P. cyanipes (F.),
A study of the large series of this genus in the
BMNH Collection showed that there are a great
many Variations in colour and colour patterns, often
one grading into another, It seems likely that there
are a number of geographical subspecies or varieties
of the different species which have yet to be worked
out,
In the second specimen in the Banks Collection
there is a ferrugineous apical spot as well us the two
humeral spots on the elytra, Pabricius in his original
(1775) description does not mention this so the
specimen labelled “Type” by C, O, Waterhouse
must be the holotype. Fabricius’ description is "C.
ovata, nigro-aenea, capite, thoracis lateribus elyt-
rorumque macula duplici, baseos ferrugineis’—
an oval Chrysomela, brassy-black, head, sides of
thorax, two spots on elytra, base ferrugineous.
NIGRIPES, Crioeeris (Lema)
Fabricius 1775, p. 120, n, 14; 1801, 1, p. 476. n. 30
(Lema)
australis Jac. 1876, p. 807 and 878, p. 152
Junk’s Catal, 1924, 24, S51, p. 48
Zimsen 1964, p. 107, n. 1646
Syntype labels:
i, Fabricius “Croceris nigripes Fab, Entom,
p. 120, n. 14".
i. BMNH “Lema nigripes’, “Type”
Locality: “nova Hollandia’”’
Current Status: Crioveris
somelidae, Criocerinac,
nigripes F.2 Chry-
Comment: The condition of the “type” is good
and all structures are complete but meso and
metathoracic legs are entangled in gluc. The
condition of the second specimen is much the same,
but the ventral surface is not so clean, Fabricius
reclassified this species into the genus Lema in the
1801 publication but since then it has been restored
to original genus. Zimsen only records one specimen
as being in the collection.
NOVAEHOLLANDIAE, Scarabaeus
Fabricius 1775, p. 29, n, 113; L801. 1, p. 57, n. 15
(Ateuchus hollandiae)
hollandiae F, 1781, 1, p. 32;
piceum Hope 184], p. 44 (Tesserodon)
Junk’s Catal. 1911, 19, 38, p. 40 (Tesserodon)
Zimsen 1964, p. 30. n. 173
Matthews 1974, p. &7 (Tesserodan)
Holotype labels:
i, Fabricius “Scarab. N. Hollandiae” FPabr,
Sp. Ins. No. 144.
iw BMNH “Ateuehus N. Hollandiae”’
January. L98L
Locality: “nova Hollandia”
Current status; Tesserodon novachollandiae (F,):
Scarabaeidae. Scarabaeinae.
Comment: The specimen is very dirty. C. O.
Westwood found this type specimen among the
unarranged specimens in the last drawer of the
Bank's Collection. The reference on the label is the
1781 reference indicating that Fabricius re-examined
this Specimen in 1780-1. In this reference Fabricius
omitted the N. for “nova”, although it is on his
label, and gave the specific name as Scarab.
hollandiae. This was copied in his later publications
and in later catalogues. The valid name now is T.
novaehollandiae (P.).
NOVEMMACULATA, Coccinella
Fabricius 1775, p. 81, n. 15; 1781, 1, p. 97, no. 26:
1801, 1, p, 366 and 61,
novempunctate F. 1775, p. 81;
picta Muls. Voet. 1796, p. 61 (Coelophora)
Junk’s Catal. 1931-32, 16, 120, p. 294 (Coelophora)
Zimsen 1964, p. 85, n, 1212
Holotype labels;
i. Fabricius ‘Coccinella 9-maculata Fabr.
Spec. 97 n, 26"
nu) BMNH "Coccinella 9-maculata”’
Locality: “nova Hollandia”’. This species has been
recorded from the Philippines and Indonesia, not
from Australia. It is probable that the “type’’ was
collected in Java, as Banks collected at Batavia when
the Endeavour stopped there for some weeks for
repairs,
Current status; Coelophora novemmaculata (F.)
synonym C. novempunctata (F.). Coccinellidae,
Coccinellinae
Comment: Holotype has been badly pinned
through left elytron, and there is a great deal of glue
on ventral surface obscuring most of the abdomen
and entangling the metathoracie legs, The right
membranceous Wing is unfolded and lying out
beyond the elytra. The apical segments of both
antennae, the right prothoracic leg and the terminal
tarsi of the right mesothoracic leg are missing.
Musgrave (1932; p, 87) in his listings of Fabrician
types from “nova Hollandia’ recorded in the
Species Insectorum (1781), states, C. 9-maculata
(1781: 1, p. 97) nom. nov. for Cece. 9-punctata Fab,
preoccupied by Cocc: 9-punctata Linne 1758".
Fabricius, however, although changing the specific
name, continued to publish both names in the
publication 1781, and in 1787 and 1801 as separate
species, Although the Linnean and Fabrician species
are now in different genera, the valid name tor the
Fabrician species is C. novemmaculata F. according
to the International Code, There is no specimen in
THE FABRICIAN TYPES OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZRALAND COLEOPTERA TKS
the Bank's Collection labelled 9-punctata F. The
type is marked with two median dark brown or black
spots on the thorax. There is no basal black line nor
is the sutural margin black, There are four black
spots on each elytron and one posterior spot which is
divided so that one half lies on each elytron.
NOVEMPUNCTATA, Coccinella
See NOVEMMACULATA, Coccinella
C, novempunctata is the junior homonym.
OBSCURUM, Callidium
Fabricius 1787, 1, p. 131. n..1, 1801, 2, p. 333, n. 1.
lentiginosus Newm, 1841, p. 7 (Phacodes)
Junk’s Catal. 1912, 22, 39, n, 70 (Phacodes)
Zinsen 1964, p, 178, n, 3008
McKeown 1947, p. 22
Syntype labels;
i. Fabricius “Call.
Ins, n, 1".
iii BMNH “Callidjum obscurum’, “Type”
obscurum Fabr. Mant.
Locality: ‘terra Diemeni”™
Current status; Pachydissus obseurus (F.):
Cerambycidae, Cerambycinae
Comment: The condition of the “type” is good.
There is a second specimen, which is very dirty;
terminal joints of antennae, left metathoracic leg
and all tarsi are missing. This large well known insect
has a wide distribution throughout Tasmania, South
and Eastern Australia,
OCTODECIMGUTTATA, Chrysomela
Fabricius 1775, p. 100, n. 31; 1801, 1, p, 439, n. 101,
keyserlingi Ws. (Phola)
sedecimpustulata Stal. (Phyllophila)
Junk’s Catal. 1924, 24, 68, p. 199 (Chalcolampra)
Zimsen 1964, p, 99, n, 1502
Syntype labels:
i. Fabricius “Chrys. 18-Guttata Fab. Entom.
p. 100 n, 31”
ii, BMNH “Chrysomela 18-guttata’’, “Type”
Locality: ‘“‘nova Hollandia”
Current status: Chalcolampra octodecimguttata
(F.): Chrysomelidae, Chrysomelinae.
Comment; The specimen labelled "Type" is not in
good condition; ventral surface is in a bad state of
preservation; right antenna and all but five joints of
left antenna, tarsi of left mesothoracic and right
metathoracic legs are missing, The condition of the
second specimen is not as good as the ‘type’. Baly
(1855: p. 186) described this species and put it into
its present genus, He notes that there are eight not
nine spots on the elytra, The depth of colour of this
species varies considerably, and the elytral spots
may or may not be distinct. These spots are arranged
in two longitudinal lines. Ou examination of the
large series in the BMNH it is seen that these spots
may or may not coalesce, In the “type” the spots in
the outer or marginal line have coalesced and
therefore definition of the actual number of spots is
obscure, The prothorax in this species varies in
colour from dark ferrugineous to pale, with or
without three black spots arranged medianly in the
form of an inverted triangle, as it is in the “type’’
OCULATA, Criaceris
Fabricius 1775, p. 121, n, 1S (C, oculata); 1801, 1,
p. 458, n, 43
sculpta Bikb 1890, p. 363 (Candezea)
Junk’s Catal. Suppl. 1973, 78, 3, p. 580 (Monolepre)
Zinsen 1964, p, 103, n, 1578
Syntype labels;
i. Fabricius ‘Crioc.
p. 121 n, 15"
ii, BMNH “Crioceris oculata”, “Type”
oculata Fab, Entom,
Locality; “nova Hollandia”
Current status: Lema oculata (F.):
somelidaé, Criocerinac.
Chiry-
Comment: The condition of the ‘‘type"' is poor,
mainly due to the presence of a large amount of glue
on the ventral surface. Right antenna and terminal
joints of the left antenna, the right prothoracie leg
except for coxa, tarsi of the left metathoracic leg and
the right metathoracic leg are missing. The condition
of the 2nd specimen is also jn a very poor state, both
antenna and all legs are missing.
In Junk's Catal, (1924, 24, 51, p. 72) this species
Was incorrectly attributed to Olivier (1791: p, 200),
Fabricius's later references are given but not the
original (1775) one. Olivier attributes tt 1o Fabricius
and gives the original reference in which the name of
the species is spelt octulataia, Fabricius himself
changed the spelling to oculata, “a justified
emendation”, first, in his Species Insectorum (1781)
and then in his later publications.
N.B. Wilcox in Junk's Catalogue Suppl, (idem,)
gives full references and synonyms,
OCULATUS, Siaphylinus
Fabricius 1775, p. 265, n, 4; 1801. 2, p, 592, n, 2
Junk's Catal, 1914, 5, 57. p, 399 (Creaphilus)
Zimsen 1964, p. 230, n, 3982
Steel 1949, p. 59
Syntype labels;
i. Fabricius “Staphyl. oculatus Fab. Entom.
p. 265 n. 4”
186
ii, BMNH *Staphylinus oculatus’’, “Type"
Locahty: ‘nova Hollandia et Zelandia™
Current status: Creophilus oculatus (F.): Staphy-
linidae, Staphylininae,
Comments: “‘Type", a male, has been pinned
twice, previously through the base of the prothorax
and now through the right elytron; terminal joints of
tight antenna are missing, membranous wings are
unfolded and extend out beyond the abdomen.
Second specimen, a female, is pinned through the
left elytron, terminal joints of both antennae and
tarsi of right metathoracic leg are missing,
prothoracic legs are immersed in glue and
membranous wings are unfolded.
See W. ©. Steel (idem.) for description of this
species and table of Australian species of this genus,
PEDICORNIS, Lamia
Fabricius 1775, p. 170, n. 1; 1801, 2, p, 282. n, 4
tuberculata Hope 1841, p. 49 (Rhytophora)
obscura Breuning 1938. p. 363 (Saperdopsis)
bispinosa Breuning 1938, p, 364 (Saperdopsis)
Junk’s Catal, 1922-23, 23, 73, p. 267 (Platyomopsis)
Zimsen 1964, p. 167, n. 2784
McKeown 1947, p, 153
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius ‘‘Lama pedicornis Fab. Entom.
p. 170 n. 2”
ii. BMNH "Lamia pedicornis’’, ‘“Type”
Locality: “nova Hollandia”
Current status; Platyomopsis pedicornis (F-):
Cerambycidae, Lamiinae.
Comment: The holotype condition is fair:
terminal joints of both antennae and tarsi of left
metathoracic leg are missing, right metathoracic leg
is detached and lying in the glue.
PORCATUS, Carabus
See PORCULATUM, F,, Calosoma
C. poreatus. F. is the junior homonym,
PORCATUS, Notoxus
Fabricius 1787, 1, p. 127, n. 1; 1801, 1, 287, n. 1
cribricollis Spin, 1844, p. 203 (Natalis)
var inconspicus Blk, 1890, p. 124 (Natalis)
Junk's Catal. 1910, 10, 23, p. 37 (Eunatalis)
Zimsen 1964, p. 72, n. 965
Holotype labels;
i, Fabricius ‘‘Not. Porcatus I, Mant, n, 1"
ii, BMNH ‘“Notoxus porcatus”
Locality: “terra Diemenii”
REC. 8, AUST, MUS 18 (&)r 155-197
January, [981
Current status: Eunatalis porcata (F.); Cleridac
Comment: The type has been badly pinned once
through the prothorax and onee through the right
elytron. The specimen has been broken between the
pro and mesothorax and then glued together, the
glue spreading over parts of the elytra and ventral
structures. Both head and legs are covered with dirt.
This specimen would have been collected by David
Nelson who travelled with Cook on his third voyage
when the Discovery called in at Adventure Bay,
Tasmania.
PORCULATUM, Calosoma
Fabricius 1775, p. 239, n, 16 (Carabus porcatus);
1801, 1, p. 211, n. 3
poreatus F. 1775, p. 239,
caraboides Kirby 1818, p, 466. (Adelium)
Junk’s Catal. 1911. 18, 28, p, 510 (Adelium)
Zimsen 1964, p. 60, n. 727
Carter 1926, p. 154
Holotype labels;
i. Fabricius “Carabus porcatus Entom, p
239 n, 16"
ii. BMNH “‘Carabus porcatus’’ A later label
has been added “Tenebrionid”.
Locality; “nova Hollandia”
Current status! Adelium porculatum (F.): (Tene-
brionidae, Ulominae,
Comment: Thé holotype is pinned through the left
elytron which is cracked, Glue conceals most of the
right metathoracic leg. Neither antenna is complete,
3 joints are missing of the left antenna, and 5 from
the right one. Most tarsi are missing and remnants of
the left meso and metathoracic legs are lying in the
glue. E. Zimsen lists Calesoma poreulatum F. with
the 1801 reference as a synonym, In this reference
Fabricius lists the name C. porecatus as the synonym
with the reference of Ent, Supt, 1792, 1, p, 147.
Fabricius himself changed the original name porcatus
to porculatumt in 1801 and this now stands as the
valid name according to the International Code,
QUADRIDENS, Curculio
Fabricius 1775, p. 153, n. 139; 1801, 2, p. 536, n. 175
Junk’s Catal, 1931, 28, 114, p, 21 (Leptops)
Zimsen 1964, p. 219, n, 3787
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius "Cure, 4-dens Fab, Entom, p.
153 n. 139
ii. BMNH “Curculio 4-dens”
Locality; **nova Hollandia"’
Current status: Leptopius (Oke 1951) quadridens
(F,): Curculionidae, Leptopiinae.
THE FABRICIAN TYPES OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND COLEOPTERA 187
Comment: The condition of the type’ is good,
There is a second specimen minus its head and
prothorax so I have designated the better specimen
as a holotype rather than a syntype. There is a large
series in the BMNH under the label L. quadridens
(F.), However, these specimens were considered by
G. J, Arrow in 1929 to have been incorrectly
identified, The posterior region of the elytra in the
Fabrician type is vertically declined, while in all the
above-mentioned specimens it is not nearly so
abruptly declined,
QUADRIPUNCTATA, Galleruca
Fabricius 1775, p. 112, n. 4 (Altica albicollis); 1801,
1, p. 499, n. 110
albicollis F. 1775, p. 112 (Altica)
splendidus Jac, 1885, p, 928 (Licyllus),
Synonymy after Bryant 1923, p. 143
Junk's Catal. 1940, 25, 166, p, 7 (Licyllus)
Zimsen 1964, p, 113, n, 1748
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius “Altica Albicollis Fab. Entom.
p. 112, n. 4"
ii. BMNH “Crioceris albicollis’, ‘'Type”
Locality: “nova Hollandia”’
Current status: Licyllus quadripunctata (F,)-
Chrysomelidae, Halticinae.
Comment; The “type” is in a poor state of
preservation. It is a very small insect and has been
pinned twice, formerly through the right elytron and
now through the suture; left elytron, right and left
antennae except for basal joints, tibiae and tarsi of
metathoracic legs are missing. Fabricius re-classified
this species into the genus Galleruca (1792: p. 29)
and in 1801 he changed the specific name to 4-
punctata due fo the pre-occupation of the specific
name albicollis which he had given to a Brazilian
species. Though both species are now in different
genera, according to the International Code
guadripunctata is the valid name.
QUADRIPUSTULATUM, Sphaeridium
Fabricius 1775, p. 67, n, 6; 1801, 2, p, 575, n, 2
(Seaphidium)
hbimaculatum Mael. 1864, p. 119 (Scaphidium)
Junk’s Catal. 1910, 8, 13, p & (Scaphidiwm)
Zimsen 1964, p, 229, n, 3943
Lébl 1976, p, 287-8
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius “Sphaerid 4-pustulatum Fab,
Entom. p. 67-6"
ii, BMNH “Type”
Locality: ‘nova Hollandia”
Current status: Scaphidium
(F.): Scaphidiidae
quadripustulatum
Comments: Holotype is a male, synonym
himaculatum Macl, is a female, The condition of the
holotype is fair, both antennae and mesothoracic
legs is are missing. It seems that when the Bank's
Collection was arranged in the order of that in
Systema Eleutheratorum this specimen was not
included, Later it must have been discovered,
perhaps in the last drawer among the unnamed
specimens by C, O, Waterhouse when he was adding
type-labels to the collection and as the label is
Sphaeridium 4-pustulatum he put it in that genus and
added a type-label to it but no other BMNH label. In
1929 when I was studying the collection K, G. Blair
of the BMNH placed it in its correct position
according to the order in the Systema
Eleutheratorum.
E, Csiki in Junk’s catalogue (idem) and in some
literature it has been attributed to Olivier, This is
incorrect and has been corrected by Y. LGbl] (idem)
in his revision of the Australian species of
Scaphidium,
QUADRIPUSTULATUS, Scarabaeus
Fabricius 1775. p. 27. n, 107; 1801, 1, p. 53, n. 105
(Copris)
bipustulatus F, 1775, p, 30
albertisi Harold 1877, p, 71 (Onthaphagus)
minusculus Macleay 1888, p. 903
(Onthophagus)
Junk's Catal. 1927, 19, 90, pp. 215 (Onthophagus)
Zimsen 1964, p, 29, n, 155
Matthews 1927, p. 220 (Onthophagus)
Holotype labels:
i, Fabricius “Scarab. 4-pustulatus Fabr. Sp.
Ins, No, 137"
ii. BMNH “Copris 4-pustulatus’’, “‘Type’’
Locality: “nova Hollandia”
Current status; Onthophagus quadripustulatus
(F.): Scarabaeidae, Scarabaeinae.
Comment! The holotype is badly pinned; bead is
sharply deflexed, right elytron and meso and
metathoracic legs are detached and lying in glue.
The club of the left antenna and some tarsi are
missing. The reference on the label is the 1781
reference indicating that Fabricius re-examined this
specimen in 1780-1. O. bipustulatus (F-) is the
female of O, quadripustulatus (F,) (Matthews idem),
RUFIPES, Gyrinus
see AUSTRALIS, Gyrinus
G, rufipes F. is a synonym of G, australis F,
188
RUFIPES, Helops
Fabricius, 1775, p. 258, n. 5; 1801, 1, p. 161, n. 34,
australis Boisd 1835, p, 282 (Allecula)
angusticollis Boh. 1858, p. 100 (Allecula)
Carter 1915, p. 79, and 1930, p. 269
Zimsen 1964, p. 50, n. 531
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius “Helops rufipes Fab, Entom, p,
258 n, 5"
i, BMNH “Helops rufipes’’ and the BMNH
register number "iw
Locality: “nova Hollandia”
Current status: Hometrysis rufipes (F.):
Alleculidae
Comment: Holotype has been broken between
meso and metathorax and badly glued together
again so that the anterior part is lying at an angle to
the posterior region, The terminal joints of the
antennae are missing and the right antenna is
detached and lying in the glue. H. J. Carter (idem.)
established that Allecula angusticollis Boh. is a
synonym, Blair (1920: p. 154) referring to this
synonym notes that “this is another name (H. rufipes
F.) that seems to have disappeared from recent
catalogues’’.
SANGUINIPES, Tenebrio
Fabricius 1775, p. 256, n. 7; 1801, 1, p. 148, n, 20
consentanea Perroud 1864, p. 119
depressa Pasc, 1886, p. 454
laticornis Pasc, (Achthosus) 1869, p, 294
Carter 1926, p. 137
Zimsen 1964, p. 46, n. 474
Holotype labels:
i. “Fabricius Tenebrio
Entom. p. 256, n. 7”
ii. BMNH “Tenebrio sanguinipes" and the
register number “VY and “Type”
iii, Achthosus laticornis Pasc,
sanguinipes Fab,
Locality: “nova Hollandia"
Current status: Uloma sanguinipes (F.); Tene-
brionidae, Ulominae
Comment: The condition of the holotype is poor,
Tt has been broken and glued together at the
junction of the meso and metathorax, All legs on left
side are missing. The holotype is a female and differs
from the male described by Pascoe (idem,) as
Achthosus laticornis in that the prothorax has no
éxcavation, the anterior tibiae are without internal
emargination and it is smaller in size, LU. sanguinipes
(F,) is not listed by H, Gebien in Junk’s Catalogue
bul if is in Carter’s check list (idem.) together with
its synonyms,
REC S. AUST MUS 18 (8); 155-197
January, 181
SCABER, Dermestes
Fabricius 1775, p. 37, n. 16; 1801, 1, p, 318, n, 32
integer Sharp (Ulonotus), new synonym
Junk's Catal. 1930, 15, 107, p, 39 (Ulonatus)
Zimsen 1964, p, 77, n, 1073
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius “Derm. Seaber Fab, Entom, p,
57, n. Léa”
ii, BMNH ‘Dermestes scaber”
Locality; “nova Zelandia”’
Current status; Ulonotus scaber (F.): Colydiidae
Comment: Specimen is very dirty and pinned
badly through left elytron. Hope (1840: p, 145)
created a new genus Pristoderus for this species.
However, both Lacordaire (1854, p. 359 nota) and
Sharp (1876, p. 17) state that this name should be
dropped as the description given by Hope was
insufficient for indentification, The species is now
classified in the genus Ulonotus Er, see Junk’s
Catalogue (idem.). A. Hetschko in Junk’s Catalogue
lists U, integer Sharp (1877, p. 268) as a separate
species. Sharp’s type is in the BMNH on comparing
this type with D. scaber F. it is found to be
synonymous with it. This is a new synonym,
SCUTELLARIS, Curculio
Fabricius 1781, 1, p, 115, n. 196; 1801, 2, p. 519, n.
71
exsertus F. 1801, 2, p. 534, n, 163
var, murinus Lea 1911, p. 63 (Prypnus)
Junk’s Catal, 1939, 27, 164, p. 259 (Prostomus)
Zimsen 1964, p. 215, n, 3702
Holotype labels:
i, Fabricius “Cure. Scutellaris Fabr, M, Ins,
n. 196"
i. BMNH “Curculio seutertlaris", Type"
Locality: ‘'Terra Diemenii"’
Current status: Prostomus scutellaris (F.): Cur-
culionidae, Brachyderinae
Comment: Holotype has been pinned twice,
previously through prothorax, now through right
elytron. [ft is in fair condition; both antennae, left
prothoracic leg except for coxa and trochanter, tarsi
and remaining legs except for right mesothoracic leg,
are missing. Al one time this species was placed in
the genus Prypnus. In Junk’s Catalogue C. exsertus
F. is given as a synonym. Fabricius records this
species from ‘nova Cambria’’, and the type as being
in “D. Billardiere”’.
SEMIPUNCTATUS, Curculio
Fabricius 1775, p. 135, n, 43; 1801, 2, p. 200, n. 11
(Lixus)
THE FABRICIAN TYPES OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND COLEOPTERA 189
cyaneipennis Boh, 1859, p, 118 (Belus)
lineatus Donoy. 1805 (Brentus)
var. poverus Lea 1917, p, 597 (Belus)
Junk’s Catal. 1935, 28, 144, p. 11
Zimsen 1964, p, 210, n, 3615
Holotype labels;
i. Fabricius “Cure. semipunctatus
Entom, p, 135, n, 43”
it, BMNH “Lixus semipunctatus’, **fype”
Fab.
Locality; “nova Hollandia”
Current status: Belus semipunctatus (F,); Belidae
Comment! Holotype is in fairly good condition,
only right antenna and tarsi of right prothoracic leg
are missing, This is 4 well known species. The
number of small whitish tufts of hairs varies
tremendously.
SEMIPUNCTATUS, Stenocorus
Fabricius 1775, p. 180, n. 8; 1801, 2, p, 306, n. 8.
inscripta Germar. 1848, p. 226 (Phoracantha)
Junk’s Catal. 1912, 22, 39, p, 90
Zimsen 1964, p, 172, n, 2901
McKeown. 1947, p. 26
Syntype labels:
i. Fabricius “Stenoc, Semipunctatus Fab.
Entom, p. 180 n. &”
ii, BMNH ~*‘Stenocorus
“Type”
semipunctatus”’,
Locality: ‘“‘nova Hollandia”
Current status: Phoracantha semipunctata (F.):
Cerambycidae, Cerambycinae,
Comment: The “type” is in fairly good condition;
some joints of both antennae and the left
metathoracic leg are missing, There is a second
specimen, this is in much the same condition.
The series in the BMNH Collection show that this
Species varies in size and in the yellow markings on
the anterior half of elytra. It has a wide distribution
throughout Australia and also been recorded from
New Guinea.
SERRATICORNIS, Pyrachroa (Lycus)
Fabricius 1775, p. 203, n. 8; 1801, 2, p, 111 a. 6
(Lyeus)
Junk’s Catal, 1910, 9, 128, p. 73 (Trichalus)
Zimsen 1964, p. 134, n. 2155
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius *‘Lyc. Serraticornis Fab. Mant.
Ins. n, 5”
i, BMNH “Lycus serraticornis’, “Type”
Locality: “nova Hollandia”
Current status: Trichalus serraticornis (F,):
Lycidae.
Comment: Very little remains of the type and the
pieces have been carded, The left antenna is
complete, there are seven segments of the right one.
The elytra are broken, The legs are missing except
for parts of the left pro and mesothoracic legs, The
abdomen is detached but still has remains of the
wings attached to it. K. G. Blair in 1929 compared
this type with the only specimen then in the BMNH,
which was from Queensland, The reference given on
the label is not the original reference but must have
been put on by Fabricius after he had changed its
genus but before the publication of Mantissa
Insectorum as there is no page number which is p,
164. In this reference he also gives the original genus
Pyrochroa with the 1781 reference.
SMARAGDULUS, Erotylus
Fabricius 1775, p. 123, n. 6; 1801, 2, p, 13, n, 5
(Cnodolon)
cupricollis Hope 1803, omitted from Carter’s list
semtiticus Pasc, 1869, p. 349 (Chalcopterus)
triangularis Haag 1878, p. 104 (Chaleopterus)
vigilans Blkb. 1892, p. 432 (Chalcoprerus)
cairnst Blkb. 1893, p. 60 (Chalcopterus)
Junk'’s Catal, 1911, 18, 28. p, 578 (Amarygmus)
Carter's Check list 1926, p. 162
Zimsen 1964, p. 116, n. 1805
Holotype labels:
i, Pabricius “Erot. smargdulus Fab, Entom,
p. [23 n, 6"
i. BMNH “Cnodulon smaragdulus”, “Type”
Loeality! “nova Hollandia”
Current status: Chalcopterus smaragdulus (F.):
Tenebrionidae, Amarygminae,
Comment; The condition of the holotype is fair;
the mouth parts are covered in dirt and parts of both
antennae, left mesothoracic and both metuthoracic
legs are missing. As in most species of this genus
there is a good deal of colour variation, In this
species it varies from a golden coppery metallic
colour through various shades of purple to greenish
copper, which is the colouring of the holotype.
In Carter’s Revision of the Australian Amary-
ginae (1913: p. 10-11) he noted that Ch, cupricollis
Hope was a synonym of Ch. smaragdulus (F-), the
synonym being determined by K. G. Blair (see
Carter’s reference 1913: p. 11) byt omitted it in his
check list (1926: p. 162). This is another species
which Fabricius re-classified into another genus.
SOLANDRI, Lamia
Fabricius 1775. p. 177, n. 31: 1801, 2, p. 304, n- 126
Junk’s Catal, 1922, 23. 73, p. 269 (Depsages)
1) REC, Ss. AUST
McKeown 1947, p. 160
Zimsen 1964, p. 172, n. 2892
Holotype labels:
i, Fabricius “Lamia Solandri Fabr. Eatom.
p. 177, n, 3t"
ii. BMNH "Lamia Solandri’, “Type”.
Locality: “nova Hollandia”
Current status: Depsages solandri (F.): Ceramby-
cidae, Laminae
Comment: The specimen is badly rubbed, most of
the pubescence on dorsal surface is absent; terminal
joints of right antenna and tarsi of both metathoracic
legs are missing. This specimen Was named after Dr,
C. Solander of the British Museum who went with
Banks on the Endeavour as another naturalist,
Froggatt 1907 p. 199 describes this Cerambyeid “as a
large beetle clothed with a dense coat of buff hairs”.
Due to abrasion of the “type” the punctation is
distinct. Disc of prothorax is rough and rugose with
no distinct tubercles, humeral angle of elytra well
marked, striae indistinct but there are large
scattered punctures diminishing in size towards the
apex.
SPECTABILIS, Curculio
Fabricius 1775, p, 155, n, 144; 1801, 2, p. 537, n, 184
Junk’s Catal. 1936, 28, 150, p, 4 (Chrysolopus)
Zimsen 1964, p. 219, n. 3796
Syntype labels:
i, Fabricius “Cure, spectabilis Fah. Entom,
p. 155, 144".
ii, BMNH “Curculio spectabilis’, “Type”
Locality: “nova Hollandia™
Current status: Chrysolopus spectahilis (F.):
Curculionidae, Aterpinae.
Comments: The condition of the "'type’’ is fairly
good though most of the tarsi are missing. In a
second specimen all structures are complete . It is
probable that the type locality may be Botany Bay as
it is a common species in that region and it is where
Cook made his first landing in Australia. The genus
Chrysolopus was put in the sub-family Cleoninae by
E.. Csiki in Junk’s Catalogue 1931, 28, 134, p, 3, In
1936 S. S. Schenkling and G, A. K, Marshall
transferred it to the sub-family Aterpinae, see Junk's
Catalogue (idem.) with a foot note that belore, il
had been “incorrectly placed in the sub-family
Cleoninae and is now put in its correct position’.
STOLATA, Cetonia
Fabricius 1775, p. 50. n. 33 (Cetonia fasciata); T781-.
p. 58, 0, 45; 1801. 2, p. [53, n. &9
fasciata F. 1775, p. 50
perversa Schaum 1844, p. 371 (Glycyphana)
MLIS 18 (8): (SS-197
January, 1YsT
hrunnipes Kirby 1818, p, 454-478 (Glycyphana),
Tunk’s Catal. 1921, 21, 72, p. 271 (Glycyphana)
Zimsen 1964, p. 142, n. 2312
Bacchus 1974, pp. 113 and 122, (Glycyphana)
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius “Stolata Ins. n. 45"
ii, BMNH “Cetonia stolata’, Type”
Locality: “nova Hollandia”
Current status: Glycyphana - stolata
Scarabaeidae, Cetoninae.
(Fi);
Comment: The Fabrician label has been mutilated
and only part of it is left. The condition of the
holotype is good and all structures are complete, but
its colour has faded. Fabricius changed the name of
this species from fasciata in the 1775 publication to
stolata in 1781 because the name fasciata was
preoccupied (Master’s 1932: p. &7), The full
reference on the Jabel should be Spec. Ins. p. 58
n, 45. In this reference Fabricius also gives the
original 1775 reference with the name C. fasciata,
M. E. Bacchus (idem,) gives a full discussion and
explains the confusion that has arisen in recognising
this species and ifs synonyms.
STREPIDUS F., Rhynchaenus
see STUPIDUS F., Curculio
R, strepidus F. is a synonym of C. stupidus F.
STRIOLA, Coccinella
Fabricius 1775, p. 79, n. 5; 1801. 1, p, 359, no. 17;
1803, Index p. 32
lineola F, 1775, p, 79
Junk’s Catal. 1931-32, 16, 120, p. 309 (Verania)
Zimsen, 1964, p. 83, n. 1179
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius “Coce, Lineola Fab. Entom, p.
79, mn, 5”
it. BMNH “Coccinella lineola”
Loeality: “nova Hollandia™
Current status: Verania striola (F,): Coccinellidae
Comment: The condition of the holotype is only
fair. There is a large amount of glue present on both
dorsal and ventral surfaces, both antennae and left
elytron are tnissing. The pro and mesothoracic legs
are covered in dirt and the methathoracic legs are
immersed in glue. There has been some confusion in
the past over the name of this species, In
Gemminger et Harold catalogue it appears as Alesia
lineola (F.). Mulsant (1866: p. 17) deseribed it under
the specific name siriola, given by Fabricius in the
Index L803 und used by Schonherr (1808: p. 156),
Whe put it in his new penus Verania, Korschetsky
THE FABRICIAN TYPES OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND COLEOPTERA 19}
lists it in Junk’s Catalogue under this genus. Mulsant
recognised the Fabrician name Cocc. lineola F. as
the type name but used the name Y. striola, In his
book (1850; p. 367) he gives no reason for this but
just followed Schanherr’s nomenclature. Both
Zimsen and Ikorschefsky give Cocc. striola F. as a
synonyin of Coce. lineala F. Zimsen records a
second type for Cace. lineola F. The two references
are:—
I. No, 1179 “Coee. lineola F. in nova
Hollandia, Mus. Dom. Banks., synonym
Coccinella striola Index Alphabeticus 1803,
p. 32".
2. No, 1235 “Coec. lineola Ent. Syst, 1, p, 283,
77” in Americac meridionalis [nsulis dam.
Smidt, Syst. El. p. 373.96". The type is in
Copenhagen where there are seven speci-
ments, This species is now placed in the
genus Psyllobora.
Somenmes Fabricius named two species in the
same venus with the same name, then realising his
error he changed the specific name of one. In this
case he changed the specific name lineola to striola
for his later publications, Now even though the two
species named fineola are placed in different genera,
auceording to the International Code the valid name
for this species is striola.
STUPIDUS, Curcullo
Fabricius 1775, p, 139, 0. 65; 1801, 2, p. 473, n. 172
(Rhyachaenus strepidus)
strepidus F. 1801, p. 473
ingrata Faust 1892, p.
synonym
Zimsen 1964, p, 206, 9, 3529
182 (Tentegia) new
Holatype labels:
i, Fabricius “‘Curc. stupidus Fab, Entom p.
139 n. 65"
li, BMNH “Rhynchaenus strepidus”
Locality: “nova Hollandia™
Current status; Tentegia Cur-
culionidae, Cryrtorrhynchinae.
stupida (F.):
Comment: Holotype is in good condition, all
structures complete though terminal joints of right
antenna are hiddén beneath rostrum. It is pinned
through left elytron.
The name of this species has bee’ omitted from
recent catalogues, The type of T, ingrata Faust, is at
Dresden, There are two specimens in the BMNH
identified by Lea as T, ingrata Faust. G. J. Arrow in
1929 verified for me that 7. ingrata Faust. is a
synonym of T. stupida F. This is another species for
which Fabncius changed the name in his later
publications, using the name R, strepidus in Syst. El.
1801. It is possible that this was merely a spelling
error in copying down fram one list to another.
Therefore the synonyms of T. stupida (F.) are
Rhynchaenus strepidus F, and T. ingrata Faust, The
BMNH label R. strepidus would have been added
when the collection was arranged in the order given
in Systema Eleutheratorum,
SULCATUM, Callidium
Fabricius 1775, p, 189, n. 11; 1801, 2, p. 340 n. 41
aculipennis White 1846, p. 20 (Coptomma)
Junk's Catal, 1912, 22, 39, p. 489 (Navomorpha)
Zimsen 1964, p, 179, n, 3037
Syntype labels:
i, Fabricius “Callid. sulcatum Fab, Entom,
p. 189 n, 11"
ii. BMNH “Callidium suleatum”, “Type”,
Locality: “nova Zelandia”’
Current status: Navomorpha
Cerambycidae, Cerambycinae.
sulcaia (F_):
Comment: There are two specimens, a male and
female. The ‘‘type”’ label is on the male, which is
dirty, pinned through left elytron and left
metathoracic leg is missing. The female has several
parts missing—Both antennae, left prothoracic,
right meso and metathoracic legs; left mesothoracic
leg is complete but is detached. The male specimen
is just over half the length of the female, Broun
(1880; p, 590) describes this species fully,
SUTURALIS, Melotontha
Fabricius 1775, p. 34, n- 2; 1801, 2, p, 166, 1, 31
chlorophylla Boisd, 1835, p. 188 (Micronyx)
prasina Cast, 1840, p. 143 (Paranonca)
Junk’s Catal. 1912, 20, 47, p. 89 (Chlorochitan)
Zimsen 1964, p, 145, n. 2361
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius ‘‘Melolontha Suturalis Fabr. Sp.
Ins, no. 15”
ii, BMNH ‘Melolontha suturalis”’, “‘Type™
Locality: “nova Zelandia”™’
Current status: Chlorochitan
Scarabaeidae, Melolonthinae.
suturalis (F.):
Comment: The condition of the holotype is fair;
except for the Jeft antenna (only 2 basal joints
present), and rhe tarsi of all legs are missing, one set
of tarsi are lying in the dried glue.
Broun (1880: p. 261) describes this species and
Arrow (1903; p, 305) gives the characters of the
genus Chlorochiton and its relation to nearby related
veneta.
SYLVICOLA, Melolontha
Fabricius 1775, p. 39, n. 34; 1801, 2, p. 181, , 123
convexus Boisd, 1835, pl 209 (Lipareirus)
salebrocus Macl. @ 1886, p. 27 (Liparetrus)
192
macleayi Blkb, 3 1888, p. 27 (Liparerrus)
Junk’s Catal. 1912, 20, 47, p. 98 (Liparetrus)
Zimsen 1964, p. 148, n. 2445
Syntype labels;
i. Fabricius “Melolontha sylvicala Fab. Sp.
Ins. n. 57”
i. BMNH “Melolontha sylvicola”, “type”
Locality: ‘nova Hollandia™
Current status: Liparetrus sylvicolus (F.);
Scurabaeidae, Melolonthinae.
Comment; The condition of the holatype is poor:
it is pinned through the left elytron; ventral surface
is covered with a thick felt of dried mycelial hyphae
and glue; Jeft mesothoracic and beth metathoracic
legs are missing, Fabricius must have re-examined
this Species before publishing in 1781 and put the
later reference on the label.
Blackburn (1905: p. 311) in his revision of the
Australian specics of Liparetrus gives the following
synonyms for L. sylvicolus (F):—L. salebrocus Macl.
2.1L. basalis Blanch. 3d and L. macleayi Blkb. 2.
Burmeister (1855: p. 198) describes both the male
and female L, sylvicolus (F,.)— He says, ‘‘nigro
pilasus, pronoto canaliculato, pygidio rugosa variol-
oso carinato’—black, hairy, pronotum grooved,
pygidium rough and variously ridged, Fabricius’s
description states, “Caput et thorax glabra, nigra,
immaculata’—head and thorax glabrous, black and
unmarked, From Blanchard’s descriphon (1850: p.
105) of L. basilis and that of Burmeister’s of L.
sylvicolus (F.) they could be the same species, In the
BMNH there ace eleven specimens labelled L,
hasalis Blanch., the habitat labels are from
Tasmania, South Australia and Nova Hollandia. In
1929 G. J. Arrow compared these specimens with
Blanchard’s and Burmeister’s descriptions and
agreed with me that they were all L. basalis Blanch,
Burmeister’s descriptions were made trom speci-
mens sent to him by Hope. He had both sexes and
they are not L. sylvicolus (F.), but are probably L.
basalis Blanch., which is now regarded as a distinct
species. In Junk’s Catalogue 1912 it is listed as a
synonym of L, sylvicolus (F.). Blackburn never saw
the Fabrician type and was evidently misled by
Burmeister’s description of the specimen he
obtained from Hope, as Burmeister stated that he
had examined the Fabrician types of the Melolon-
thinae in London. Blackburn assumed he would
have studied and described the type of L. sylvicolus
(F.), although in his descriptian Burmeister states
that he obtained the specimens from Hope,
Blackburn did note that Burmeister's description did
not coincide with Fabricius’s description as regards
sculpture and pubescence, but was so sure that
Burmeister's description was of the Fabrician type
that he concluded that Burmeister’s specimens were
REC. § AUST. MUS 18 (8): 155-197
January, 1981
of the same of species. Fabricius had more than one
specimen. there is ane in his own collection in
Copenhagen, as he adds to his description, “variat
interdum elytris fuscus’-—at times there is a
variation in the elytra which may be dark ta
tawny.—The type, be describes as “elytra abdomine
breviora, laevia mgra’’—elytra shorter than abdo-
men, smooth, black—He also states that the type
was in the Banks Collection, but it is possible that he
kept the “type” specimen in his own collection and
returned another specimen, a variety, to Banks. The
specimen, in the Banks Collection has reddish or
fuscus elytra, therefore these two specimens should
bath he regarded as syntypes.
L. basalis Blanch is not a synonym of L. sylvicalus
(F.) but is a separate species. N. B. In Junk’s
Catalogue the species is spelt silvicola,
TOMENTOSA, Lagria
Fabricius 1775, p. 125, n. 9; 1801, 2, p. 70, n, 9
pulchrivaria Lea. 21917, p. 175
Junk’s Catal, 1910, 17, 2, p. 13
Zimsen 1964, p, 128, n, 2037
Holotype labels;
i. Fabricius ‘‘Lagria tomentosa Fab. Entom,
p, 125, n. 9”
ii. BMNH “‘Lagria tomentosa”, ‘“Type”
Locality: ‘nova Hollandia”’
Current status: Lagria s.g. Ecnolagria (Borch,
1936 p. 142) tomentosa F.: Lagriidac.
Comment; The condition of the halotype is poor,
pinned at the sutural margin of left elytron and
cracking it; ventral surface distorted; mouth parts
covered in dirt; both antennae, terminal tarsus of
left prothoracie leg, right prothoracic leg, both
mesothoracic legs and tarsi of both metathoracic legs
are missing. Lea (1917: p. 175) described the male
under the name L, pulcharivaria, Blair (1920: p,
155) determined this synonymy. Champion. (1895; p.
229) pointed out that the species commonly known
as L, tomentosa F. from Western Australia does not
agree with the Fabricius type, it should be known as
EF. aeneoviolacea Champ. In Masters Catalogue
1885, p. 387 the locality is erroneously given for the
Fabrician species as Western Australia
TRIBULUS, Curculio
Fabricius 1775, p, 193, n. 138; 1801, 2. p. 536. n. 174
echidna Macleay 1863-66, p. 280
Junk’s Catal, 1931, 28, 114, p. 23 (Leptops)
Zimsen 1964, p. 219, n. 3786
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius “Curc. Tribulus Fab. Entom. p.
153, n. 138"
ii, BMNH ‘Curculio tribulus’’, "Type"!
THE FABRICIAN TYPES OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND COLEOPTERA
Locality: “nova Hoallandia”
Current status: Leptopius (Qke 1951) tribulus (F.):
Curculionidae, Leptopiinae.
Comment: Holotype is in good condition, only
tarsi of prothoracic legs are missing. There has been
confusion about the identity of this species, G. A. K.
Marshall (1952; p. 265) compared the types of L.
tribulus (F.) and L. ferus (Pasc.), both of which are
in the BMNH and stated that they are separate
species, What A, M, Lea (1906 p, 326) describes as
L. ferus (Pasc.), agrees with the Fabrician type of L.
tribulus. Lea in his table, states that L, ferus (Pasc.)
has “a rostrum carinate in the middle” which applies
to L. iribulus (F.) not to L. ferus (Pasc.) which is
grooved. The description given by Lea of L. tribulus
(F.) describes that of L, duponti(Boisd,), L. duponti
Boisd. is the common species often erroneously
called L. tribulus (F.), and mentioned as such in R.
J. Tillyard’s book of Insects (1926: p, 242), There is
a large series in the BMNH labelled L. duponti
(Boisd,) from Austraha, Two specimens in this
series have been identified by Lea as L. rribulus (F.)
but are definitely L, dupontt (Boisd,). L. duponti
(Boisd.) (1835: p. 333) is given as a female synonym
of L, tribulus (F.) in the Gemminger et Harold
catalogue. [t is not a matter of sexual differences, it
is a distinct species.
Therefore, L. duponti (Boisd.), L. tribulus (F,),
and L, ferus (Pasc,) are distinct species. L. echidna
(Boisd.) is given as a synonym in Dejean’s
Catalogue and Junk’s Catalogue and ts incorrectly
attributed to Macleay. The specimen in the BMNH
labelled L. echidna (Macleay) (Boisd.) is the same
as L, dupont (Boisd.) not L. ribulus (F,).
TRIDENS, Curculio
Fabricius 1787, 1, p. 122, n, 271; 1801, 2, p. 537, n.
186
sextuberculats White 1846, p. 13 (Rhinaria)
Junk’s. Catal, 1935, 28, 144, p. 2 (Agathinus)
Zimsen 1964, p. 219, n. 2798
Kuschel 1970, p. 197
Holotype labels;
i. Fabricius ‘Cure, Tridens Fabr. Mant, Ins,
n. 271”
ii, BMNH “Curculio tridens”, ““Type’’ There
is another label but it is unintelligible. [t
may read “‘variety sexual of C. expor-
ti—Mus Dom Labrielle”’
Locality: “nova Zelandia”’
Current status: Agathinus tridens (F.): Belidae.
Comments: Holotype is a female, Synonym
sextuberculatus White is a male (Kuschel idem,)
Holotype has been pinned twice, now through left
elytron, previously through prothrorax; most of the
193
antennae, and all tarsi except those of the left
mesothoracic and right metathoracic legs are
missing.
TRISTIS, Necydalis
Fabricius 1787, 1, p. 170, n. 5; 1801, 2, p. 370, n. 14
miranda Newm. 1851 App., p. 133 (Dohrnia)
anthina Olliff 1887, p. 154 (Ithaca)
Zimsen 1964, p. 185, n. 3148
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius “‘Necy, Tristis Fabr. Mant. Ins.
n 5"
ii. BMNH “Necydalis tristis”, Type”
Loeality: “terra Diemenii"’
Current status: Dohrnia tristis (PF): Qedemeridae.
Comment: Only the abdomen of the holatype
remains. This species has been omitted by
Schenkling in Junk’s Catalogue 1915, 17, 65, p. 72
and the two synonyms are listed as separate species.
Blair (1929; p. 158) determined the above synonymy
but it has been overlooked by subsequent workers of
the species, Blair states, ‘“‘Unfortunately all that
remains of the type is the abdomen attached to the
pin. The description in conjunction with Olivier's
figure, leaves no doubt that the insect was the female
of the species better known us Dohrnia miranda
Newm., and an examination of the abdomen makes
this identity certain. Olliff evidently did not know
Newman’s insect, but his description is. so full and
detailed as to leave the synonymy beyond question.”
This reference is omitted from Musgrave's Bib-
liography of Australian Entomology, Also R. J.
Tillyard used the name D. miranda Newm. in his
book ‘Insects of Australia and New Zealand” an
p. 225.
TRUNCATUS, Scarahaeus
Fabricius 1775, p. 4, nm. 12; 1801, 1, p. 7, a. 18
(Geotrupes)
Junk’s Catal. 1937, 21, 156, p. 58 (Pericoptus)
Zimsen 1964, p. 21, n- 12.
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius “Scarabaeus Fabr, Sp. Ins, No.
16”
i. BMNH ‘Geotrupes truncatus”
Locality: “nova Zelandia’ as recorded in 1775
publication.
Current status: Pericoptus truncalus (F.);
Scarabaeidae, Dynastinae.
Comment: The condition of the holatype ts good.
only the club of the left antenna and the tarsi of the
metathoracic legs are missing. The reference on the
label indicates that Fabricius re-examined this
specimen in 1780 and put the 1781 reference on the
4
label. At the same time he must have recorded the
locality erroneously as ‘nova Hollandia’ which was
copied in his later publications.
TUBERCULATA, Cicindela F-
Fabricius 1775, p. 225, n. 7: 1801, 1, p. 238, n. 32.
tuberculosa Ol. 1790, p. 732
latecincta White 1846, p. 1
Junk’s Catal. 1926, 1, 86, p. 200.
Zimsen 1964, p. 64, n. 800.
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius ‘‘Cicindela
Entom. p. 225 n. 7”
ii. BMNH “Cicindela tuberculata”’
tuberculata Fab.
Locality: “nova Zelandia”
Current status: Cicindela tuberculata F.; Cicin-
delidae.
Comment: The condition of the holotype is fair. It
is pinned through the left elytron. Only the three
basal joints of the antennae are present, the right
mesothoracic leg is entirely missing and none of the
others are complete.
There is a second specimen labelled “nova
Zelandia, Nel.”. This specimen is without head, pro
and mesothorax. ‘‘Nel!."’ would stand for Nelson, the
collector who sailed with Cook on his third voyage.
This specimen would, therefore, have been collected
at a later date than the holotype.
E. Zimsen records that 2 specimens are in the
Banks Collection and one at Kiel but incorrectly
records the locality as ‘nova Hollandia’’. In both the
1775 and 1801 references Fabricius records the
locality as ‘nova Zelandia™. Tt is a New Zealand
species.
UNIFASCIATA, Crioceris (Lema)
Fabricius 1775, p. 120, n. 13; L801, 1, p. 474, n. 28
(Lema)
Junk’s Catal. 1924, 24, 51, p. 82 (Lema)
Zimsen 1964, p. 107, n. 1644
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius “Crioc. Unifasciata Fab, Entom,
p, 120 n. 13,
ii. BMNH “Lema unifasciata’, “Type"’.
Locality: “nova Hollandia”
Current status: Lema' unifasciata F. Chry-
somelidae, Criocerinae.
Comment: Holotype is pinned through left
elytron; left antenna, and terminal segment of right
antenna are missing. Femora and tibia of left
mesothoracic leg and both metathoracic legs are
entangled in the glue. Fabricius re-classified this
species into the genus Lema in 1801.
REC, S& AWST MUS 18 (4); 155-197
January, 1987
VARIEGATA, Lepiura
Fabricius 1775, p. 199, n. 19; 1801, 2, p. 375, n. 2
(Molorchus)
Junk’s Catal. 1912, 22, 39, p. 286 (Hesthesis)
Zimsen 1964, p, 186, n, 3163
Type specimen has been lost from the Collection
Locality: ‘nova Hollandia’”’
Current status: Hesrhesis variegata (F.): Ceramby-
cidae, Cerambycinae.
Comment: There is a large series in the BMNH
General Collection, McKeown (1947: p. 89) gives a
complete list of references but he erroneously
records the type as being in the BMNH. This
specimen was re-classified by Fabricius in 1801 into
the genus Molorchus.
VARIEGATUM, Callidium
Fabricius 1775, p. 189, n. 9; 1801, 2, p, 340, n, 39
viratum Newm. 1841, p, 18 (Coptomma)
Junk’s Catal, 1912, 22, 39, p. 488 (Coptomma)
Zimsen 1964, p. 179, n, 3035
Syntype labels:
i, Fabricius “Callid variegatum Fab, Entom.
p. 189, n, 9”
ii, BMNH “Callidium variegatum"”, ‘‘Type"
Locality; “nova Zelandia”’
Current status: Coptomma variegata (F,):
Cerambycidae, Cerambycinae,
Comment: There are two specimens a male and
female, The male specimen has the Museum “type”
label. It is pinned through the left elytron; neither
antenna is complete and the legs are entangled in
glue on the ventral surface. The condition of the
female is in an excellent state of preservation and all
structures are complete. Broun (1880; p. 589) gives a
detailed description of this species,
VILLOSA F,, Saperda
see HIRTA F. Saperda
§, villosa F. is a synonym of S, hirta F.
VIOLACEUS, Notoxus
Fabricius 1787, 1, p. 127, n, 1; 1801, 1, p. 287, n. 2
niger Sharp 1877, p. 7 (Balcus) new synonym
Junk’s Catal. Suppl, 1950, p. 297 (Phymatophaea)
Zimsen 1964, p. 72, n, 966
Holotype labels:
i. Fabricius ““Notoxus violaceus Fabr, Mant.
Ins. n. 2”
ii. BMNH ‘“Notoxus voilaceus™
THE FABRICIAN TYPES OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND COLEOPTERA 185
Locality; “nova Zelandia™
Current status: Phymatophora violaceus (F.):
Cleridae
Comment: Ventral surface is covered with dirt
and all legs ure closely intertwined. The type of
Balcus niger Sharp is in the BMNH, A comparison
of this type with N. violaceus F. shows them to be
synonymous. This is a Tew synonym and was
confirmed by K. G. Blair when | was working in the
BMNH in 1929, A study of the series of this species
in the BMNH shows that this species varies
considerably in size. colour and markings on the
elytra, which may be three pale spots, two, one of
none at all. The Fabrician type has a metallic violet
tinge and three pale sports om the elytra, tibiae, tarsi
and hase of the femorae are ferruginous. The type af
B. niger Sharp is black and there are no colour spots
on elytra; tibiae and tarsi are black. The Fabrician
type is devoid of hairs, probably due to abrasion,
while the Sharp type is scantily covered with hairs.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Many thanks go ta Dr G, F, Gross and Dr E, G
Matthews al the South Australian Museum and Mr
M. S. Upton of the Division of Entomology,
C.S.1.R.0., in Canberra, who read the manuseript
and have given me valuable help and advice, and
also to the authorities of the South Australian
Museum, especially to Dr G. F. Gross, who made it
possible for me to use the facilities in the
Entomology Section, | also thank Dr E, C,
Zimmerman, and Dr E. G. Britton of the Division
of Entomology, C.S.1.R.0., for their help and
advice. My thanks also go to my husband for his help
in checking references, and translating many of the
original Latin descriptions. In the final stages, on my
return to London to complete the study, I thank the
authorities of the British Museum (Natural History)
for allowing me to work there once more, and in
particular 1 thank Mr R. D. Pope and Mr R, T,
‘Thompson.
REFERENCES
ARROW, G, J., 1903, On the affinities and nomenclature of
certain genera of melolonthid and rutelid Coleoptera. Ann.
Mag. nat. Hist. (Ser, 7) 14; 303-306.
ARROW, G. J. 1915, Notes on the coleopterous family
Dermestidae and descriptions of some new forms in |he
British Museum, Ann. Mag nat. Hisr, (See. 6) 15: 425-451.
ARROW, G. J., 1920, A peculiar new Genus of Australian
Becucs. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist, (Ser. 9) 6: 434-437,
BALY,. T., 1855, Monograph of the Australian species of
Chrysomela, Phyllocharis, and allied genera. Trans, ent. Soc
Lond, (n.s,) (3) 5: 170-86,
BALY, T., 1856, Monograph of the Australian specie of
Chrysomela, Phyllocharis, and allied genera. Trans. ent. Soc.
Land, (1.8,) (3) 5: 241-65,
BANKS, Sit Joseph, 1963, The Endeavour journal 1768-1771, ed,
by J. C, Beaglehole. Sydney: Trustees of the Public Lib, of
N.S.W. in Association with Angus & Robertson, 964 pp.
BACCHUS, M. E., 1974, Revision of Australian species of
Glycyphuna. Aust. ent. Soc. 13 (2): 111-128,
BLACKBURN, T., 1896. Further notes on Australian
Coleaptera, with description of new genera and species
Truns, Ray. Sac. S. Aust. 20; 35-109
BLACKBURN, T., 1898, Revision of the genus Paropsis. Parr
Ul. Proc Linn. Soc. N.S,W. 23 (2);
BLACKBURN, T., (899, Revision of the genus Paropsis, Parts
IV-V, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W.. 24 (3): 482-521.
BLACKBURN, T,, 1905, Further notes on Australian
Coleoptera, Trans, Ray. Soe. S. Aust, 28 270-332,
BLAIR, K. G., 1913, Trifolium castaneum Herbst, = ferrigineum
F. Ent. mon. mag. (Ser. 2) 24: 223-224,
BLAIR, K. G., 1914, On the Fabrician types of Tenebnonidae in
the Banks Collection, Ann. Mag, nat, Hist, (Ser. 8) 93: 482-
oth.
BLAIR, K. G., 1920, Further notes on the Fabrician types of
Heleromera (Coleoptera) in the Banks Collection. An.
Mag, nal. Hist. (Ser. 9) S$: 153-63.
PLAYCHARD, ©. E., 1850, Catalogue of Coleoptera Env. 1; 1-
13
BLANC HUMAD,, ©. E., 1862, Monograph of Cassididae Suppl. 4;
1-504,
RO eae J.B. A., 1835, Voyage of the Astrolabe, pares ds
7: \-716.
BROUN, T,, 3880-6, ‘Manual of New Zealund Coleaptera.”
Published hy Command, Wellington, New Zealand,
BROUN, T., 1903, New genera and species of New Zealand
Coleoptera. Ann. Mag, nat. Hist. (Ser. 7), 12: 69-286,
BROUN, T., 1904, New genera and species of New Zeoland
Coleoptera, Ann. Mag. nat, Hist, (Ser, 7), 14: 105-127,
BROUN. T., 1909, New genera and species of New Zealand
Coleoptera. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (Ser &), 4: 130-161
BROUN, T 1917, New genera and species of New Zealand
Coleoptera. Bull. N.Z, Inst, 1 (5): 347-474.
BRYANT, G, E,, 1923, Notes of synonymy in the Phytuphiga.
Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (Ser. 9) 12: 130-147 :
BURMEISTER, H, ©., 1855, Handbuch der Entomologie 4: 198,
Berlin Theob, Ehr. Fnedr. Enslin.
CAMERON, H, C. , 1966, “Sir Joseph Banks, K.B., F-R-S”.
Angus & Robertson, Sydney. 341 pp,
CARNE, P. G,, 1957, A systematic Revision of Australian
Dynastinae. C.S.).R.0. Melbourne. 284 pp.
CARNE, P. G,, 1958, A Review of the Australian Rutclinuc.
Aust, J, Zoi, 62: 162-240.
CARTER, H. J.,.1913, Nores and tabulation of the Austrahan
Amarygminae, Trans. Roy Soc §, Aust. 37: 6-49.
CARTER, H, I, 1915, Revision of Cistelidae Proc, Roy. Soc;
Vicr. 28 (n.s.): $2-104
CARTER, H. J. 1926, Check list of Australian Tenebrionidae,
Aust. Zool. 4 (3): 117-163,
CARTER, A. J,, 1929, Chack list of Australian Buprestidae.
Aust. Zool, 5 (4) 265-304.
CARTER, H. J., 1930, Check list of Australian Cistelidue. Aust,
Zool. & (3); 269-276,
CARTER, H. J., 1935, Australian Coleoptera, Proc Linn. Soc.
NSW 9 3-4.
CHAMPION, ©, 1895, On the Heteromerous Coleopteri
collected in Australia and Tasmania by Mr, James J. Walker,
R.N,, F.L.S,, during the Voyage af H.M.S. Penguin, with
descriptions of new genera and species. Part 1. Trans. ent
Soc. Lond. 1895: 213-276,
COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL
RESEARCH ORGANISATION, 1970, “Insects of Aus
tralia” Melbourne University Press, Carlton. 1029 pages,
CROWSON_ R. A, 1964, A review of the classification of
Cleroidea. Trans, R, enp. Soc. Lond 16: 275-327,
FABRICIUS. J C., 1775, Systema cntomologiae’’. (Flensburg
ex Lipsiac), 832 pages.
FABRICIUS, J. C.. 1781. “Species insectorum"™, t and 2,
(Hamburg! et Kilonii). S82 and 517 pages,
FABRICIUS, I. C., 1787, ‘Mantissa inseclorum”, # and 2
(Halniae), 348 and 382 pages.
FABRICIUS, J. C., 1792-94, “Entomologiae Systematica” 1-4.
(Hafmiac), 519, 487, 349 and 274 pages.
FABRICIUS, J, C,, 1798-9, “'Supplementum Entamologise
Systemanea™. (Hatniae), 572 and 52 pages.
FABRICIUS. J, C.. 1801, “Systema Bleutherstorum’, t and 2
(Kiliae), 506 and 687 pages.
FABRICIUS, J. C., 1803, “Index Alphabeticus", Helmstadii, 94
pages.
tye
FABRICIUS, J. C_, 1845, “The Autobiography of John Christian
Fabricius”. Translated from the Danish by the Rev. EF W.
Hope, A-M.. F.R.S., Trans. ent, Soe. Lond. 4: 1-16-
FAUST, J, 1892, Fanf neue Curculioniden Von Australien, Eni,
Zeitting, Sterting, 53, ar. 7-9; 179-184,
FALUVEL, A., 1889, Liste des Coléoptéres communes a l'Europe
ct a Amerique du Nord, Rew, Ent: Caen, 8: 92-174-
FROGGATT, W. W , 1894, On the life histories of Australian
Coleoptera. Proc. Linn. Soe. N.S.W. (Ser 2) 9 (1) 113-125,
FROGGATT, W W., 1907, “Australian Insects", Willlam
Brooks & Co, Ltd. Sydney, 447 pages,
GEMMINGER et HAROLD, 1868-1876, “Catalogus Coleop-
lerum. Hucus que descriptarum synanymicus et systerm-
aticus” 1-12. Various publishers, Pans.
GERMAR, E, F., 1848, Beitrige zur Ipsekten fauna von
Adelaide. Linn. Ent, 3: 153, 247,
GROUVELLE, A. H., 1912-13, Nores sur les Nitidulides. Ann-
Sac. ent. France, 81: 387-400.
HERBST. J. F. W., 1789-1806, Natursystem aller heKannten ip-
und auslandischen Insecten—Der Kafer, 4: 138, and 6: 29,
HINTON, H, E,, 1945, “Beetles associated with Sjored
Products” |, British Museum (Natural Aistory). 441 pages:
HOPE, F-W_, 1840, >The Coleopterists Manual’ 3: 1-191. Bobn,
Land.
HUTTON, F. W., 1904, “Index Faunae Novae Zelandixe’’.
Dulau & Co, Lond., 371 pages,
ILLIGER. J. ©, W,, 1807, Maguzin fiir Insectenkuunde. (Maunch.
Vieweg), p. 36.
JACOBY, M., I885, On new Phytophagous Coleoptera, Proc.
Zoul, Soc. Lond, pt, 4; 925-929,
KIRBY, W,, 1818, A Description of several new species of insects
collected jin New Holland by Robern Brown Esq. F.R.S..
Trans. Linn, Soe. Land, 12: 454-488,
KUSCHEL, G., 1969, The Genus Catoptes Sehanherr and two
new species oblitae of Fabricius from New Zealand, New
Zealand J. Sci, 2: 789-810
KUSCHEL, G, 1970, New Zealand Curculioniodea fram
Captain Cook Vayages. New Zealand J Sei, 13: 191-205.
LACORDAIRE, T., 1854-76, Histoire Naturelle des Insectas. 1-
12. Roret, Faris.
LAMEERE, A,, 1904, Révision des Prionides. Ann. Sac. enn
Belg. 48; 7-78,
LAPORTE, ™M, F. L de., 1833, Une révision du Genre Lampyre.
Ann. Sac. ent. France 2: 122-154.
LEA, A. M., 1902. Descriptions of same new species of
Australian and Tasmanian Chrysomelidae. Report from
Australian Association for the Advancement of Science, p.
402-3.
LBA, A. M., 1908 Notes an the genus Leptops with description
of new species, Ann Soc. ent. Belg. 50: 326-29.
LEA, A. M,, 1908, Reyision of the Australian and Tasmanian
Malacodermidae. Trans, ent, Sac, Lond, pr. 1; 45-251,
LEA, A. M.. 1913, Revision of Australian Cureulionidue—
Cryptorhynchides. Prac. Linn. Sac. N.S, W_. 3B) 457-489,
LEA, A. M., 1913, Notes on Australian Crypltorhynchides.
Trans. Roy, Soc, S. Aust. 37; 182-300,
CEA, A. M., 1914, Notes on Australian Cetonides, Trans. Ray.
Soc, 8, Aust, 38: 132-218-
LEA, A. M., 1917, Notes on some miscellaneous Coleupters,
with deseriptions of new species. Trany. Ray, Sec. 8. Aust.
41: 121-322.
LEA, A_M., 1918, Notes on same miscellaneous Coleoptera with
Cescciptany of new species. Trans. Rey. Soc. 5S, Aust, 42; 240-
LEA, A.M. 1923, Gn some Australian Galerucides. Pree. Linn.
Soc. N.S.W. 48 (4): 519-575.
LEPESME_P,, 1939, Note synonymique sur les Dermesres, Bull.
Soe. ent. France 44: 190-193,
LESNE, P., 1897, Révision des Bostrychides. Ann, Soc. ent,
France 66: 321-350.
TINNE, Ral 788-1793. "Systema Naturae™', ed. by J, F, Gmelin
13 ed, 4.
LOBL, 1,, 1976, The Australian species of Scaphidium Oliver.
Journ, Aust. enr Sac. 18 (3): 285-297,
McKEOWN, K. ©., 1947, Catalogue of Australian Ceramby-
cidae Aust, Mus. Memars i). Trustees of Australian
Museum, Sydney. 190 pages.
MACLEAY, W,, 1871, Notes on a collection of insects from
Gayndah_ Trans. eni, Soc. N.S.W. 2 (3); 159-205,
REC. 8S. AUST. MUS 18 (8): 155-197
Junaary. L98t
MACLEAY, W.. 1886, The genus Liparetrus. Price Linn Sov.
N.S.W. (Ser. 2) L (3): 307-852
MAIDEN, J H,, 1909, “Sir Joseph Banks—The Father of
Australia’, W. A, Gulligk, Sydney
MARSHALL. G. A. K., 1926. Now Curculionides from New
Zealand Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (Ser. 9) 1Rr 1-16.
MARSHALL, G. A. K., 1930, New Curculionides with notes on
synonymy. Ann. Mag, nar, Hist, (Ser. 10) 6: 3-31
MARSHALL, G, A, K., 1944, On the Genera of the tribe
Cypincetini, Ann, Mag. nat. Hise (Ser 11) 11: 73-98.
MARSHALL, G. A. &., 1952, Taxonomic notes on Cur-
culonidae. Ann. Mag. nal. Hist. (Ser. 12) tS: 261-27).
MARSHALL, G. A. K., 1956, “Oribius of the Sub-family
Otiorrhynchine.” British Museum (Natural History), Lon-
don. 134 pages.
MARSEUL,,S, A, De, 1855, Essai monographique sur Ja famille
des Histérides. Ann. Soc. ent, France (Ser, 3) 3: 327-506,
MASTERS, G,, 1871, 1885-1887, “Caralogue of the described
Coleoptera of Australia’. Sydney,
MATTHEWS, E, G.. 1972. A Revision of the scarabacine dung
beetles of Australia. I, Tribe Onthophagin. Ausr, J. Zeol,
Suppl. 9: 1-330.
MATTHEWS, E, G., 1974, A Revision of the scarabszine dung
beetles of Australia, IL, Tribe Searabaeini, Aust. J. Zool,
Suppl, 24: 1-211.
MULSANT, M. E., 1850, Spec. Triméres Securipalp, Ann, Soc,
d'Agri, Sci et Indust. de Lyon (Ser, 2) 2; 1-1104,
MULSANT, M., E., 1866, Monographie des Coceinellides, Part.
Paris. 292 pages,
MUSGRAVE, A., 1932, “Bibliography of Australian Entomolo-
gy 1775-1930". Royal Zoological Society of NLS W , Sydney,
MUSGRAYE, A., 1954. “Insects of Captain Cook's expedition",
Aust, Mus, Mag. Ul (7), 242-237.
MUSGRAVE, A.. 1955, Insects of Captain Cook's expedition.
Aust. Mus. Mag. 11 (9): 303-306,
NEWMAN, E,, 195], On ihe chyracters and affinities of
Dohrnia, Zoologisr @ 135-[37.
OCHS, G,, 1949, Revision of Australian Gyrinidae, Ree, Aust
Mus. 22 (2): 170-192.
OKE, C,, 1951. Coleoptera of Russell Grimwade Expedition.
Mem, nal. Mus. Vie. ¥7: 19-25.
OLIVIER, A. G,, 1780-1807, “Histoire Naturelle des Insectes",
Vols. 1-6, Pans.
OLLIFF, A_S., 1887. Contributions toward 4 knowledge of the
Coleoptera of Australia. 1V_ Deseription of a new genus and
species of Osdemeridae. Proc, Linn, Soc, NSW 21); 153-
155,
PASCOE. F. P.. 1866, New or litte known species of Coleoptera.
Joam. Brt. 2: 443-499,
PASCOE, F. P., 1867. Charactérs of some new genera of rie
Cerambycidae,--genus Zorion, Ann. Mag. nat, Hist. (Ser. 9)
19; 410-213,
PASCOE, F. P., 1867, Description of new Genera and Specics of
New Zeuland Coleaptera. Ann. Mag nat. Hist. (Ser. 4) &
16-19.
PASCOE, F. P,, 1869, Tenebrionidae from Australia and
Tusmania, Ann, Mag, nar. Hist, (Ser, 4) 31; 277-296,
PASCOE, F. P., 1882, Additions to Australian Curctlionidae.
Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (Ser. 5) 9! 374-383.
PRELL, H., 1934, Rejtrage zur Kepntnis der Dynustiden. Fn.
GBI. 30: 55-60.
ROSSI], P., 1790, “Fauna Etrusca. Listens imsecta, quae ing
provinciis Florentina et Pisana praesertim Collegit'’, 1. Masi,
Liburni, 272 pages,
SAUNDERS, W. W,, & JEKEL, H., 1855, Curculionidae. Ann,
Sec, ent. France (3) 3 (2): 289-306.
SCHENKLING, §. (ed.) 1926, “Coleoplererum catalapus
auspiciis et auxilio’ W. Junk. Vols, 1-30, W- Junk, Berlin.
SCHONHESS, C. J., 1808, Synonymia Insectorum, Crypto-
cephalus, Marguard, Stackholm. 424 payes,
SHARP, D,, 1876, On the Colyiidae of New Zealand. Ann Mag.
nal. Hist (Ser, 4) 18: 17-29,
SHARP, D., 1876, New Genera and species of New Zealand,
Colegptera, Enr. mon, Mag. 4-3: 78-79,
SHARP, D,,. 1877, Deseriplions of some new species and
indications of New Genera of Coleoptera from New Zealand.
Ent. mon, Mag. 14: 7-10.
SHARP, D., 1880-2, Qn Aquatic Carnivorous Coleoptera on
Dytiseidae. Sci. Trans. Roy. Soc. Dublin 2 (2): 179-1003.
THE FABRICIAN TYPES OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND COLEOPTERA 197
SLOANE, T. G., 1923, New Genera and species of Coleoptera.
Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 48 (2): 17-39.
STAIG, R., 1931, “The Fabrician Types of Insects in the
Hunterian Collection in the Glasgow University” 1,
University Press, Cambridge. 110 pages.
STEEL, W. O., 1949, On Australian species of Creophilus. Proc.
Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 74 (1-2): 57-61.
TILLYARD, R. J., 1926, “Insects of Australia and New
Zealand”. Angus and Robertson Ltd., Sydney. 560 pages.
TUXEN, S. L., 1959, Der Entomologe J. C. Fabricius und Typen
der von ihm beschriebenen Arten. Zool. Anz. 163: 343-350.
TUXEN, S. L., 1967, The entomologist, J. C. Fabricius. Ann.
Rev. Ent. 12: 1-14.
WATT, J. C., 1968, Specific synonymy in Mimopeus Pasc. and
the status of some related genera. New Zealand Ent. 4 (1):
35-39.
WESTWOOD, J. O., 1843, On the longicorn Coleoptera of New
Zealand. Arcana Ent. Lond. Smith 2: 25-28.
WESTWOOD, J. O., 1871, Descriptions of some new exotic
species of Lucanidae. Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. pt. 3: 353-374.
WESTWOOD, C. O., 1906, Report. In “History of the
Collections contained in the Natural History Departments of
the British Museum”, p. 580. British Museum (Natural
History), London.
WHITE, A., 1846, Zoology. Voyage of the Erebus and Terror. E.
W. Janson, London 2: 1-27.
ZIMMERMANN, A., 1917 (1919), Die Schwimmkafer des
Deutchen Entomologischen Museums in Berlin—Dahlem.
Arch. f. Naturgesch. 83 (A. 12): 213.
ZIMSEN, E., 1964, “The Type Material of J. C. Fabricius”.
Munksgaard, Copenhagen. 656 pages.
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SOILS
1. NOTATION 2. BIFEMORATA AND PTYCTIMA (CRYPTOSTIGMATA)
BY DAVID C. LEE
Summary
A study of sarcoptiform mites from surface soil (usually greatest depth = 4cm) at 9 florally diverse
sites in South Australia is introduced. A modified notation for mite morphology is presented. The
following 6 species of Bifemorata or Ptyctima were collected and are either newly described or
annoatations are given: Stomacarus abresi n.sp., Loftacarus siefi n.gn., n.sp., Ctenacarus araneola
Grandjean, Protoplophora palpalis Berlese, Hoplophthiracarus shealsi n.sp. and Rhysotritia
wallworki n.sp. Some relevant higher taxa are redefined. New synonyms are Aphelacaridae under
Adelphacaridae, Ctenacaridae under Palaeacaridae and Andacarus under Stomacarus. New
combinations are campbellensis, ligamentifer and watsoni (ex Andacarus) with Stomacarus,
longicaudatus (ex Stomacarus) with Loftacarus and africanus (ex Ctenacarus) with Beklemishevia.
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SOILS.
1, NOTATION.
2, BIFEMORATA and PTYCTIMA (CRYPTOSTIGMATA)
By DAVID C, LEE
South Australian Museum, Adelaide, South Australia 5000
ABSTRACT
LEE. D, C. 1980), Sarcoptiformes (Acari) of South Australian
soils |. Notatian. 2, Bifemorata and Ptyciima (Crypto-
stigmuta). Ree. 8. Aust. Mus, 18(9)) 199-222,
A study of sareoptiform mites from surface soil
(usually greatest depth = 4 cm) at 9 florally diverse
sites in South Australia is introduced. A modified
notation for mite morphology is presented. The
following 6 species of Bifemorata or Ptyctima were
collected and are either newly described or
annotations are given! Stomacarus abresi n.sp,,
Loftacarus siefi n.gn., n.sp., Ctenacarus araneola
Grandjean, Proteplophora palpalis Berlese.
Hoplophthiracarus shealsi n.sp. and Rhysotritia
wallworki n.sp.. Sofne relevant higher taxa are rede-
fined. New synonyms are Aphelacaridae under
Adelphacaridae, Ctenacaridae under Palaeacaridae
and Andacarus under Stomacarus. New combin-
ations are campbellensis, ligamentifer and watsoni
(ex Andacarus) with Stomacarus. longicaudatus (ex
Stomacarus) with Loftacarus and africanus (ex
Ctenacarus) with Beklemishevia
INTRODUCTION
The aim of this study is to give a broad (yet,
because of resources, necessarily superficial) indica-
tion of the sarcoptiform mite (Cryptostigmata and
Astigmata) fauna of South Australian soils. This
group was selected because it is startlingly poorly
known in Australia and because its members, with
two small groups of mites (Notostigmata and
Endeostigmata), are the only arachnids capable of
ingesting solid particles.
The limited extent of knowledge about Australian
Cryptostigmata 3s illustrated by comparing the
known mite fauna of Australia and that listed from
New Zealand by Spain and Luxton (1971). Of the
832 species of New Zealand mites, 380 species are
Cryptostigmata. Whilst, of approximately 1 300
species of Australian mites, 19 species are
Cryptostigmata. This situation will be partially
rectified by a study of Cryptostigmata of the Pacific
area by Professor Janos Balogh and Dr. Sandor
Mahunka of Hungary. It is to be pubhshed in the
near future, and refers to 200 or more species from
Australia, mainly from east coast forest regions
(personal communication). As elsewhere, the
Astigmata of Australian sails are neither as
abundant nor as diverse as the Cryptostigmata, In
fact the only abundant species found in this study,
and then anly at the pasture site, was the
casmopolitan Tyrophagus similis Volgin.
The Cryptostigmata and Astigmata in soils feed
on decomposing plant material, fungi, algae,
bacteria and frass, Solid particles are fragmented
and ingested, and are evident as relatively opaque
boli in cleared specimens. Unlike purely Jiquid-
ingesting mites they deposit faecal pellets similar to
the frass of some insects and containing living micro-
organisms. In other wards, this group mechanically
breaks down plant material, metabolize some of it,
and feeds on and disperses organisms that also
metabolize it. Furthermore, it is likely that the food
preferences of particular species are limited, some,
for example, feeding on only fungi, or even only
certain fungal species. Therefore a study of
variations in their fauna between different sites is
pertinent to assessing variations in the decomposing
pracesses that Jead to nutrients being made available
to growing plants,
During the sorting of samples neacly 30 000 adult
Cryptostigmata and Asligmata were separated oul
and grouped in about 120 species. Relatively few
immatures were collected and these are referred to
only when they can both be identified and belong to
4 species that would not otherwise be represented
from a particular site,
The author intends to classify the species in a
number of publications and then comment on their
distribution.
The higher classification used will be detended
only as it deviates from that in “The oribatid genera
of the world’ by Balogh (1972). Since Balogh’'s
classification, although comprehensive, does nat
answer the plea by Woolley (1971) for improvement
in the ill-defined and complex system of classifica-
tion for the Cryptostigmata, definitions of higher
taxa will be presented and there will be a bias
towards simplification by reducing the number of
supecfamilies and families.
All material is deposited in the South Australian
Museum, Adelaide.
This particular publication presents the notation
used for mite morphology and collection data. Then
the six species of mites collected that belong to the
Bifemorata and Ptyetima are classified and
described when necessary,
200
NOTATION FOR MORPHOLOGY
Unless specified, attributes belong to adults.
Much of the description of the soma is dealt with
under four headings related to the areas illustrated
(Fig. 1). The term external mala (see Hughes 1959:
139) is used rather than ‘rutellum’, and spermapositor
rather than ‘penis’ since the relevant structure is not
an intromittant organ. The term cowl is used for a
proteronotal rostral hood which encompasses the
retracted gnathosomal appendages, a condition
previously referred to as ‘stegasimy’. A partly new
notation for hairs, chaetotaxy and pores is presented
below, plus that for mensuration.
REC. S. AUST. MUS, 18 (9): 199-122
January, 1981
Hairs
Hairs are regarded either as setae if they have
actinochitin and are hollow with no protoplasmic
core, solenidia if they have no actinochitin and a
protoplasmic core, plasmic setae (‘eupathidia’,
‘famuli’ and ‘sensilli’) if they have both actinochitin.
and a protoplasmic core. All hairs examined in this
study exhibited only peripheral birefringence under
polarized light, so they apparently always lack an
actinochitin core. Solenidia usually occur dorsally on
the distal segments of appendages, and are all
referred to by the symbol so, and numbered, the
more proximal and anterior solenidia first.
HYSTERONOTUM Oe eae tole
OPISTHOSTERNUM ~— \
~ jaF
PROTERONOTUM
\
_- GNATHOSTERNUM
4 a: ™
IDIOSTERNUM
Chaetotaxy of Soma
Up to four systems of notation for dorsal setae of
Cryptostigmata have been used in a_ single
publication, and a fifth system is usually used for the
Astigmata. This has sprung from a desire to link the
systems of notation with only confident proposals of
homology. On the other hand, confusion results
from multiple systems, and this has led me to follow
a single system with less stringent proposals of
homology. This system was initially applied to the
opisthonotal shield of species of Zercon by Sellnick
(1944) and then modified and extended to the notum
of other members of the Gamasina (Mesostigmata)
by Hirschmann (1957) and Lindquist and Evans
(1965). Amongst sarcoptiform mites it has been used
only for the Pelopoidea (Cryptostigmata) by
Schweizer (1956) and Hammer (1972). It is based on
a grid in which the ranks are represented by numbers
and the files by letters derived from German words
(J, inner = central; Z, zwischen = between; S,
seiten = lateral; R, rand = edge). Capitals are used
for hysteronotal files and lower case letters for
proteronotal files. The complete dorsal chaetotaxy
(holotrichous condition) is regarded as three pairs of
wa
~~. PODOSTERNUM ~~
Fig. 1—Zones of soma surface.
a
aft
\
PROSTERNUM
files with two proteronotal ranks and six hys-
teronotal ranks. Further setae may be present: if
lateral to file S, and possibly representing a further
file, they are referred to file R; if they clearly reflect
a hypertrichous condition they are represented by
the notation for the file lateral to them combined
with ‘x’ as in Jx. When only a few setae are missing
compared with the holotrichous condition, the
absence of a setal pair is illustrated by a circle and
superimposed cross in order to indicate the
numbering used in the text. For example, in Fig. 2,
the third seta in file Z is Z4 not Z3, Z3 being
regarded as missing and represented by a circle and
cross. Also on illustrations, a number as a prefix to
the file signature, for example as in 5Z, indicates
how many setae are present in the file.
The ventral setae are either strictly somal setae or
they are born on coxal regions which merge in with
the soma. The opisthosternal setae belong to the
former group and have notations similar to those of
the hysteronotal setae except that they are regarded
as either aggenital or adanal, the g or arepresenting
one or other group being prefixed by either J, Z or
S. The genital setae, those actually on the ovipositor
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SOILS elt]
or spermapositor, are either proximal (pg), median
(mg) or distal (dg) and are numbered from the
anterior. The podosternal setae are labelled by a
roman numeral representing the leg articulating with
their coxosternal zone, sometimes followed by a
number representing ranks of which the first is at the
adaxial end. and then by either @ (anterior), mm
(median), p (posterior) or d (dorsal). The
gnathosternal setae are regarded as adoral (ao),
postoral (po), palp coxosternal (¢) and supracoyal
(cd), the numbers and letters applied to palp
coxasternal sefae are as for the podosternal setae,
Chaetotaxy of the Appendages
The widely used notation for the leg setae of
sarcoptiform mites is based on french words such as
‘unguinale’ and ‘fastigiale’. It was. devised by
Grandjean in 1935 and later modified ta make the
notation for the lateral surfaces of legs I and II
match the homologous surfaces of legs TIT and IV
(Grandjean 1940a). Because the system is esoteric
and linked to debatable proposals of homology, T
have used a system which is a manifest reference to
setal position. Although in some instances I have not
been able to rigidly keep to this, For example, the
proximal dorsal seta, dl, on tarsus 1 (‘famulus’) has
been regarded as occurring in different posidons
(compare Figs. 7, 27 and 42).
The widespread convention athongst Specialists
deseribing characters on arthropod appendages is 10
refer to their position as if on a cylinder-like segment
and to use co-ordinates of two signature systems
based on their location bath an a hypothetical
circular cross-section of the cylinder and on the
straight proximal-distal axis. Two such notations
have been ignored by acarologists, One was
proposed by Newell (1956 and 1957) for Oppia
(Cryptostigmata) and the other by Southcott (1961)
for the Erythraeoidea (Prostigmata), Qn the other
hand, a notation that dramatically improved
methods of distinguishing families of Gamasina,
proposed by Evans (1963), is now used generally for
the Anactinochaeta, The Anactinochaeta is the
other of the two major groups of mites, Sarcop-
tiform mites belong ta the Actinachaeta which have
optically active chitin in their setae. Amongst the
Anactinochaeta a single whorl of setae al a
particular position on the proximal-distal axis is
considered (Evans 1963) ta be basically made up of 6
setae (2 dorsal, | anterior, 2 ventral, 1 posterior),
Amongst the Actinochaeta a single complete whorl
is Considered as including 7 setae (1 dorsal, 2
anterior, 2 ventral, 2 posterior) as an tibia | of
Palaeacarus (see Grandjean 1940b; Fig. 1). Qn the
other hand the ‘fastigiale’, ‘tectale’ and ‘itérale’
setae on tarsus T (see Grandjean. 1954c; Fig. SA) are
apparently 3 pairs of dorsal setae. Therefore, 1 am
repardinp a single whorl as including setae that cari
be referred to one of 8 positions (2 dorsal, 2
anterior, 2 ventral, ? posterior), although a complete
whorl of § setae has not be deseribed, and no claim is
made here that such a whorl is a lost primitive
condition, The notation used for the eight positions
is ad, pd; dp. vp; pu, av; va, da_as illustrated (Fig.
19). In each pair of letters the last one represents the
major area, Tf there is only one seta present in a
particular quarter of the circumference then only
this last letter is piven. Since paired dorsal setae only
aceur in the absence of paired anterior and paired
posterior setae, itis possible that one or both of the
paired dorsal setae fad_ pd) are homologous with a
dorso-anterior (da) or 4 dorso-posterior (dp) seta or
both on other segments. The apparently dorsal setae
on the tarstis, for example. having migrated
dorsalwards from a primitive lateral location. The
whorls are numbered fram the proximal to the distal
end, tarsus I is regarded as having 4 whorls, or a
maximum potential or 32 setae. Whilst there are
usually considerably fewer than 32 setae, members
of the Bifemorata may have more, a condition Which
is regarded here as hypertrichous.
Pores
Balogh (1972) classifies pores into the following
groups (notation in parentheses); slit-like pores (ia.
ip, ips, th); reduced sacculi pores (Pa, P;, P;, P;):
sacculi (Sa, S;, §,, S;); areae porosae (Aa, Ay. As,
Ay, Ad, Al, App). Because some of these letters are
already in use, | am using ‘f' (foramen) as a signature
for all pore types. Slit or punctiform pores are
prefixed by ht (hysteranotal), Za (lateral adanal) or
Ja (central adanal). Sacculi, which are always
hysteronotal are prefixed by s and similarly area
porosae by m (multiporose area), A number
following the signature equals the rank of a
particular pore and a number before indicates. how
many pores are jn the file, The pore of the lateral
hysteronotal gland duct is referred to as hGf.
Mensuration
Measurements are in microns (4m), The
idiosomal length is an average of the number of
specimens which are jndicated afterwards in
parentheses with their range of lengths. For
inembers Of the Ptyctima, bysterosamal and
proterosomal lengths are given separately. The
idiosomal length of the holotype, or about average
size specimen for established species, from Which the
appendage measurements were taken, is given in
parentheses befare these measurements. Lengths for
the chelicera are the longest axis of the movable digit
and for the palp and legs are the distances from the
base of the trochanter to the tip of the tarsus. The
breadths are the greatest width of the femur or, in
202 REC. S, AUST. MUS 18 [9); 199-122
the case of the Bifemorata, the telofemur. In the
case of the mites longer than 250 jam measurements
are to the nearest 5 pm for most lengths and nearest
2.5 wm for the cheliceral length and all breadths, For
mites under 250 jum in Jength the measurements are
to the nearest 2-5 wm for most lengths and the
nearest 1-0) wm for the cheliceral length and all
breadths.
NOTATION FOR DISTRIBUTION DATA
Under the heading of ‘Material examined’,
callectian data and registration numbers are given
for all mites examined in detail. Under ‘Distribution’
a wider indication is given of where 4 species is
known to occur using a notation for geographical
location, South Australian sites that are part of this
study, and numbers of mites and their distributian
amongst samples. This notation is explained under
three headimgs: ‘samples’, ‘sites’, ‘geographical
location’. The sampling process and sites will be
considered in more detail in the final paper of this
series that will be concerned with the distribution of
the relevant mites.
Samples
Samples were collected in plastic bags in a
manner similar ta a method | previously used (Lec
1973), They were, therefore, disturbed and would
not have yielded such a high proportion of their mite
fauna as undisturbed core samples. The top 4 cms of
soil, plant litter, moss and other plants with a similar
growth form were collected from 25 ® 25 cm
squares. An exception to this was the Knoit Hill
cultivated pine forest site from which, because of the
unusual depth of the litter, four'samples of different
layers to. a depth of 16 cms were taken from each
25 * 25 cm square, Usually samples of eight 25
25 cm Squares were taken from each site, so that the
number of adults of a particular species of mite ata
site represents an extraction from half af a square
metre of soil surface area, but collections from only
two 25 = 25 cm Squaces were taken from the Knott
Hill cultivated pine forest site.
The numbers given after the site, for example 10
(5/8), equal the number of adults collected and, in
parentheses, the number of 25 * 25 cm squares of
soil surface that the adults were taken fram as a
fraction of the total number sampled (usually &, but
2 in the case of the pine forest site).
Sites
Sites were selected in order to represent floral
diversity using the description of South Australian
vegetation by Specht (1972). They also present a
wide range of geographical locations. All nine sites
are given a brief description below, The mites
January. 19871
referred to in this publication were only callected
from five of the nine sites, but the value of the
negative results is emphasized. No attempt has been
made to register seasonal variations in populations.
in all instances sampling was done when the ground
was relatively damp and therefore the sarcaptiform
mite population was presumably relatively large.
The sites with rhe lowest rainfall are listed first for
those with native flora, whilst the two final
cultivated sites have the one with the highest rainfall
listed first. Annual rainfall figures given below are
ranges of average annual rainfalls that include such a
value for a particular site. Prior to cultivation the
flora of the cultivated sites would haye been similar
to the savannah woodland in the case of pasture and
sclerophyll forest in the case of pine forest.
. Arid tussock graysland: Vietoria Desert, 28° 41'S, 132°. 08' E.
Bases of love grass (Bragrosfis eriopda) tussocks amongst
patches of tall mulga (Acacia aneura) shrubland, on deep
red silicequs sand of swale between ridges. Annus rainfall:
[25-150 mm, sporadic 11.10.1976.
2. Semi-arid Jow shrubland: Koonamore, 32° 07’ §, 139° 21' B.-
Litter, muss and other law growth plants under bladder
saltbush (Avriplex vesicaria) amongst false sandalwood
(Myaporum platycarpum) low open-woodland, on rolling
plain, with sandy clay loam on limestone pan, Annual
rainfall! 750-200 mm, sporadic. 27.4.1974,
3. Mallee-broombush open-scrubland Ferries-MeDonald, 35°
15' S. 139° 09' E. Litter and sparse moss, under ridge-
fruited mallee (Eucalyprus incrassala) clamps amongst
broombush shrubs (Melaleuca uncinata) on low hill with
shallow caleareous sandy soil and sparse clayey subsoil on
limestone pan. Annual rainfall: 350-4) mm. mainly
winter, 20.6,1974.
4, Mallee-heath tall open-shrubland> Tamboore, 35° 57'S. 140°
29’ E. Liner under banksia shrubs (Banksia ornata)
amonest sclerophyllous shrubs and sparse brown stringy
back mallee (Bucalyptus baxter’) on tidge in area of deep
caleareous sand. Annual rainfall: 450-500 mm, mainly
winter. 4.71974,
5. Coastal closed-scrubland: Piccaninnig Ponds, 38" 03" S, 14uU°
57’ E Litter and sparse grass under coastal wattle (Acacia
sophorae) with little light beneath canopy on black
calcareous sand at landward edge of coastal dunes,
sometimes inundated from permanent pond fed by fast
flowing underground strearns trom limestone hills. Annual
valotall: 700-750 mm, mainly winter. 3,7.1974 and
20,8 1975,
6, Savannah woudland: Chambers Gully, 34° 58’ 5, 138° 41' E.
Fither litter under manna gum trees (Eucalyptus viminalis)
or grass and moxs in between these trees on shallow red
brown loam of gully slopes in Mt. Lofty foothills. Annual
rainfall) 900-950 mm, mainly winter. 12.6,.1974.
7. Sclerophyll forest! Mt. Lofty. 34" 59° 8, 138° 45’ B. Litter and
sparse oioss under Sclerophyllous shrubs amongst
messmate Stringybark (Eucalyptus ebligua) in furest near
summit of Mt. Lofty on shallow, grey siliceous sand,
Annual rainfalf; 1150-1200 mm, mainly winter
9.51974,
&. Pine foresr Knott Hill, 357 12’ S, 138° 41° E. Litter under
cultivated Pinus pinea with little light beneath canopy on
siliceous sandy soil on rolling hills in Mt. Lofty Ranges,
Annual rainfall: 950-L000 mm, mainly winter.
22.5.1974.
9. Pasture: Glenthorne, 35° 02' $, 138° 32’ E. Bases of cultivated
Brass and plantain (Plantago lanceolata) on deep brown
loam on rolling hill in foothills of Mt. Lofty Ranges.
Annual rainfall: 500-550 mm, mainly winter.
12.6. 1974.
Geographical Lacation
Geographical regions are represented by 2 or 3
letters, the first af which, in capitals, equal the major
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SOILS
region, They are as follows: Nearctic (Nn—north-
ern. Ne—calilornian, Nr—rocky mountain,
Na—alleghanian); Neotropical (NTm—mexican,
NTa—antillean, NTb—brazilian, NTe—chilian);
Ethiopian (Ew—west, Ee—east. Es—south,
Em—malagasian); Palaearetic (Pe—european.
Pm—medilerranean, Ps—siberian, Pe—manchu-
rian); Orjental (Oi—indian, Oe—ceylonese, Os—
indochinese, Om—indomalayan); Australian
(Am—malayan, Aa—australian, Ap—polynesian.
An—newzealandian); subantarctic (Sm—magella-
nian, Sk—kerguelenian. Sa—antipodean); Antaretic
(ACr—rossian, ACs—scotian). For details of
divisions between these regions see the map thar I
have previously published (Lee 1970: p. 207).
SYSTEMATICS
Cohort BIFEMORATA
Diagnosis; Macropylina (Balogh 1972: 31). Pale
adult with weakly delineated shields not completely
encasing soma. Rostrum never longer than distance
between setae jl-/] and does not form cowl capable
of encompassing retracted gnathosomal appendages.
Genital and anal shields together almost as long as
opisthostermum, and never separated by more than
length of seta Jal. No conspicuous idiosternal
division. Coxae distally free from podosternum-
Femur divided into basifemur and telofemur. Either
tarsus I or tibia | or both with 4 solenidia, Between
20 and 40 setae on tarsus I. Immatures similar to
adult.
Remarks; The classihcation by Balogh (1972)
follows that of Grandjean (1969) to include six
families grouped in three superfamilies, but the
listing of Beklemishevia (under Ctenacarinac below)
and Tragardhacarus (under Palaeacarinae below)
under Aphelacaridae is original and probably
constitutes a typing error, [ have reverted to an
earlier classification (Grandjean 1954c) in regarding
the three superfamilies as families, But in
introducing new characters to delineate these
families, 1 have grouped Clenaearinae under
Palaeacaridae rather than with the Adelphacarinae.
There are also less important changes in the
classification. Whilst members af the Acaronychidae
and Palaeacaridae were collected in the present
study and are considered below, no adelphacarids
were collected so they are briefly considered here.
Adelphacaridae (Adelphacarinae Grandjean, 1954c;
198) includes two penetra: Adelphacarus Grandjean,
1952b (not 1932 as given by Balogh, 1972) and
Aphelacarus Grandjean, 1932b, Itis known from the
Nearetic and Palaearetic Regions. Aphelacaridae
Grandjean. 19S4c is newly synonymous with
Adelphacaridae and is regarded as junior since it is
listed after it on the same page, despite the fact that
213
its type genus is much betrer known and far a longer
time, Adelphacarus is based on a4 single specimen
from Sweden with the region of the first rank of
hysteronoral setae destroyed. Grandjean (1954c)
distinguished Aphelacaridae by its having only two
pairs of genital papillae and deep furrows rather
than fine striations behind the proteranotal shield,
which ts not considered adequate here to distinguish
a suprageneric taxon,
Key to Families of Bifemorata (Adult)
1. Aggenital file Ig includes 6 setae. If proteronotal shield
present, itis nol extensive enough anteriorly lo carry either
selae jl or 21. Some hysteronotal setae conspicuously
stouter than athers Sets Z2 sharter than J3 (1-75 = oF
less) and approximately level with J2 (21-22; 1-J2 = 0-9
or more:]) - Acaronychidae
Aggenital file Tg includes 7 setae. Proteronotal shield present
and carrying setae jl and zl. If some hysteronotal setae
conspicuously stouter then seta 22 is longer and
conspicuously displaced forward , . -
2. Aggenital seta Jg] hammer-like or claw-like. Some fytiehes
nota] setac conspicuously stouter than others. Seta Z2 is
subeqgval to or longer than J3 and conspicuously displaced
forward (Z1-22:N-J2 = 0:25-0:51) . Palaeacaridae
Aggenital seta Jel setose. Hysteronotal ‘setae all telatively.
slim. Seta 22 shorter than J3 (0-6 = or less) and
moderately Sieplarnd forward (21-22:N2 =
0-6-0-75:L) _.... Adelphacaridae
Family ACARONYCHIDAE Grandjean
Acaronychidae Grandjean, 1932b; 426,
Archeonothridae Grandjean, 1954a: 428.
Type genus; Acaronychus Grandjean, 1932b,
Diagnosis: Bifemorata. Gnathosternal seta aol
simple or bifid, Proteronotal shield absent or limited
ta posterior half of proteronotum. Rostrum has
veniral recess with bilabed refractile lining (equals
“oeil”’ of Grandjean, 1958b). Some hysteronotal
setae conspicuously stouter than others, with seta 22
shorter (0-73 »« of less) than J3 and approximately
level with J2 (distance ratio 21-272:J)-J2 = 0-9 or
more:!), Aggenital file Jg with six setose setae. On
tarsus I seta dl proximad to solenidium sol,
subequal ia length or longer than sel, and ciliate.
Tibia Ef with 2 solenidia, Pretarsi with 3 claws,
central claw less than quarter the length of lateral
claws,
Remarks: Acaronychidae is used here-as by Sheals
(1965) and 1s equivalent ta Archeanothroidea
Grandjean, 1969 which is used by Balogh (1972). Tt
is not known why Grandjean treais Archeono-
thridae as having priority over Acaronychidae ar if
there js any basis far Balogh (1972) giving it the
authority with the apparently incorrect date of 1932,
Sheals (1968) compared the genera of this family and
considered that it might be preterable ta consider
them as a single relatively homogeneous group. lam
currently retaining two subfamilies bur including a
new grouping of genera. A study of the four
unnamed species from South Africa referred to by
Grandjean (1958a; 76) might resolve which grouping
204
is best, One of these unnamed species was grouped
in Stomacarus and is commented on belaw in the
remarks on that genus, although it would be grouped
in the Archeonothrinae as defined here.
Subfamily ACARONYCHINAE
Acaronychidae Grandjean. 1932b; 426.
Type-genus: Acaronychus Grandjean, 1932b,
Diagnosis; Acaronychidae. Female genital setae
thickened to stout, curved spines, conspicuously
shorter than the aggenital setae. The longest
hysteronotal seta (J3) shorter than distance between
seta! bases J 3 and <I. Seta J2 marginally posterior to
£2, Opisthosternal setal file Sa includes 2 setae On
tarsus |, setae add and pd4 not plasmic, but similar
to setae d3.
Distribution: Southern temperate and subantaretic
regions (see Stemacarus). In narthern temperate
regions represented by Acaronvchus between
latitudes 30° and 50° North, mainly in hilly or
mountainous country (Oregon—Ne; North
Carolina—Na; France—Pe; Tangiers, Algeria,
Caucasus Mountains—Pm; Tadzhik Soviet Socialist
Republic—Ps),
Remarks: The modification of the female genital
setae is heavily weighted so that Stomacarus
(assurned synonymous with Andacarus) is grouped
in this subfamily for the first ime. Members of the
subfamily also have correlated attributes such as
relatively short hysteronotal setae. The following 2
nominal genera are included in the Acaronychinae:
Acaronychus Grandjean, 1932: Stomacarus Grand-
jean, 1942a.
STOMACARUS Grandjean
Stomacarus Grandjean, 1952a: 360.
Type-species; Stomacarus tristani Grandjean, 1952a,
by monorypy-
Andacarus Grandjean, 1958a: 81. nsyn.
Type-species: Stomacarus macfarlani Grandjean,
1957, by monotypy,
Diagnosis; Acaronychinae. Ciliated seta dl on
tarsus 1 with only slightly spatulate tip (no wider
than distance between tips of nearhy cilia),
Proteronotal shield conspicuous, with reticulate
markings and carrying at least seta j2. Setal pairs J1
and #1 all on single hysteronotal shield. Delineated
tip of mentum broad-based, wider than distance
between setal bases clp and ¢2. Lines from setal base
cla ta clp and c2 would enclose ai acute angle,
Opisthosternal setal file Sg mcludes 2 setae,
Distribution: Southern temperate and subantaretic
regians between latitudes 25° and 55° South. All
records are with the original descriptions of nominal
REC. 8. AUST. MUS 18 (9); 199-122
January, 1981
species except for S. macfarlani Grandjean. 1957. El
Bolsén, Argentina—NTc (Balogh and Csiszar_ 1963)
and S, ligamentifer (Hammer 1967), TahitimAp
(Hammer 1972).
Found on ground, with dead leaves and branches,
or On mosses, liverworts, low plants and lichens on
bark.
Remarks; Only male attributes are known for the
type species of Stomacarus based on a single
specimen from Tristan da Cunha. Grandjean
(1958a) examined two females of one amongst the
four new species of South African “Archeono-
thrinae’ before hitn. They were small, their genital
setae on the ovipositor were somewhat enlarged
proximally but slim medially and distally as on the
male spermapositor of similar species and, finally,
their hysteronotal setae Were similar to those of S,
tristant, From these few attributes, and because the
fauna of Tristan da Cunha is likely to be similar to
that of South Africa, he grouped this unnamed
species in Stomacarus. This led him to exclude S.
macfarlani fram Stomacarus because of its stout
curved, genital setae and establish it as the type of
Andacarus. If Grandjean (1958a) was correct, then
according to the classification presented here,
Stomacarus and Andacarus would be in separate
subfamilies. Although three of the five characters
used in the diagnosis of Acaronychinae are not
known for S, tristani, the other iwo da fit, and at
least one other mite, Parasiriphis aurora Lee, 1970,
in a genus with a similar far southern distribution to
Andacarus, is found in the Tristan da Cunha Island
Group. Therefore, ] have excluded the unnamed
South Ajirican “Stamacarus’ females (Grandjean
1958a) from Stomutcarts and regarded Andacarus as
synonymous with Stomacarus. If a female of 8S.
rristani is found and none of its genital setae are
thickened curved spines then the subfamily group-
ings as presented here will have to be disregarded.
The follawing 6 nominal species are included in
Stomacarus: 8. abresin.sp., South Australia—Aa; 8.
campbellensis (Wallwork, 1966) n.comb., Campbell
Island—Sa: 8S. ligamentifer (Hammer 1967) na.
comb,, New Zealand—An; S. macfarlani Grand-
jean, 1957, Argentina—NTe; S. tristrani Grandjean,
1952a, Tristan da Cunha—Sk; S. watsoni (Travé,
1964) n, comb., Macquarie Island—Sa,
Stomacarus abresi n.sp.
Figs. 2-9
Female
General appearance and measurements: Dull
ivory-white, with apricot-coloured shields and legs,
Extremities of chelicerae and external malae,
hysteronotal setae and female genital setae blackish
brown. Other setae and claws are light brawn.
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SOILS
5.07 8,9
Figs. 2-9—Stomacarus abresi n.sp. 2-7 and 9, female: 2, notum; 3,
gnathosternum; 4, idiosternum; 5, left chelicera, anterior
surface; 6, part left palp, anterior surface; 7, legs, darsal
setae on genua, tibiae and tarsi, 9, oyipositor, ventral view,
partially extruded, 8. male; spermapositor, ventral view.
206 REC. & AUST. MUS IK (9): 199-122
Idiosomal length 350 (20, 305-370. amongst which
those with only one or no eggs are 355 or less):
appendage lengths (for 320)—eh 40. pa 105, 1290, [1
210, 17190, TV 275: telofemur breadths—pa 22,5, 7
40, 17 32,5, TT 30, IV 27.5.
Prosternum: Gnathosoma drawn (Fig. 3) is
dorsoventrally squashed, Palp coxite seta cd shorter
but stouter than seta aol and lying just dorsal ta
palp. Seta aol is simple and setose, Whilst
extremities of external mala are strongly refractile,
those of internal mala are hyaline. Coxosternal seta
Id shorter but stouter than seta aol and lying just
dorsal to leg [. Coxosternal seta I/| set in a poteh in
the edge of coxite Il. On coxite TV there is a median
seta (JV3m) in the distal whorl (unlike Acaranychus
tragardhi).
Proteronotum: Protéronotum drawn (Fig, 2) fore-
shortened because it was tipped ventralward,
Plasmic seta, 22, finer than illustrated, Apodemes
extend anteriorad from setal bases j/2 and 92,
Proteronotal shield between setae [2 has a
reticulated pattern of punetations, and extends
laterally to encompass base of seta z2 and carry setae
sl and s2,
Opisthasternum: Shields around genital orifice
only vaguely delineated, Pore-like structure on
ovipositor proximad to seta dgl (possibly equals
reduced seta on Stomacarus macfarlani Grandjean,
1957).
Hysterononim: Shields not so clearly delineated as
drawn and adaxial setae are foreshortened because
of the angle of their axis (Fig, 2). Larger setae with
two rows of small cilia,
Appendages: Chelicera with grooved notch an
proximal edge of anterolateral surface, Setae: ch (2),
pa (Q-2-1-3-18), I (0-4-6-5-6-37), IT (1-5-6-5-7-27).
IT (2-2-3-3-6-26), PV (3-3-3-4-5-25]. Solenidia: pa
(0-0-1) [ (2-4-4), TT (1-2-4), HT (1-1-0), TV (1-2-0).
On tarsus [1 solenidium so2 is very small (regarded
as “famulus’’ by Grandjean, 1957; 217—..e. sela
dl).
Eggs: Amongst 20 type females. four have 0 eggs,
five have 1 epg, six have 2 eggs, four have 3 epgs,
one has 4 eggs. Eggs about 130m long. ellipsoid
with uniform smooth surface.
Male
Measurements and spermapositor (otherwise as
female): Idiosomal length 340 (3, 345-360). All
genital setae are setose, shorter but of similar
diameter to aggenital setae, No equivalent of
anterior pore noted,
Material examined; Vfolotype female (N197613), 19
paratype females (N197614-N197632), allotype male
January, T98l
(N197633) and 2 paratype males (N197634 and
N197635), moss and litter under Eucalyptus obliqua,
sclerophyll forest, Mt. Lofty 9.5.1974, D. C. Lee.
Undesignated female (N197636) and male
(N197645) litter under Eucalyptus inerassata,
mallee, Ferries-MeDonald Reserve, 20.6,1974, D,
C. Lee. Undesignated protonymph (N197784), litter
under Pinus pinea, Knott Hill Forest, 22,5.1974, D,
C, Lee,
Distribution: South Australia—Aa:!
Ferries-McDonald, mallee-broombush open-scrub-
land, 10 (5/8); Mt. Lofty, sclerophyll forest, 23 (5/8),
Knott Hill, cultivaied pine forest, 1 protonymph
(—/2).
Remarks: In order to distinguish S. abresi. species of
Stomacarus can be regarded as including two groups:
those with a slim, tapering proteronotal seta z2, and
those with a tape-like or lanceolate sera 22, The
latter group (S. camphellensis, 8. ligamentifer and S.
walsoni) trom New Zealand and its lar southern
islands have a narrow, square-shaped proteronotal
shield only carrying seta j2. also the small
hysteronotal seta J4 is cither on the same shield as
Z4 or its base is.as close to setal base 24 as its length.
The former group includes S. abresi, S. maefarlani
and S. tristani. S. abresi can be distinguished from S.
macfarlani, which has a narrow proteronotal shield
and seta J4 on the same shield as 24 as in the latter
eroup. S. abresi can be easily distinguished from S.
tristant, Which differs from all other known species of
Sromacarus in having longer, sinuous, smooth
hysteronotal setae. On the other hand S. abresi and
S. fristani are similar in having a broader
proteronotal shield and seta J4 further from seta 74
and not on the same shield. S, abresi alsa differs
from both S, tristani and §. macfarlaniin having five
setac on basifemur I] rather than four setae. S.
dbrest also differs trom S, watsoni, as well as
Acaronychus tragardhi, in having a setose rather
than a bifid seta aol.
Subfamily ARCHEONOTHRINAE Grandjean
Archeonothridae Grandjean, 1954a; 428.
Type-genus: Archeonothrus Trigardh, 1906: §71
Diagnosis: Acaronychidac, Female genital setae
may be slighty thickened to spines, but, if so, then
straight and longer than aggenital setae. The longest
hysternonotal seta (J3) longer than distance between
setal bases J3 and 21. Seta J2 at least marginally
anteriar to 22, Opisthasternal setal row Sa includes
3 selae. On tarsus [, setae ad4 and pd differ from
setae d3 in being plasmic.
Distriburion: Southern temperate regions; South
America and South Australia (see Loftacarus) and
South Africa (Archeonothrus, see Grandjean,
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SOILS 207
shea SPs
7:
J445+6.
\
11, 13,15, 16
Figs. 10-16—Loftacarus siefi n.sp. 10-14 and 16, female: 10,
notum; 11, left chelicera, anterior surface; 12, idiosternum; 13,
gnathosternum; 14, part left palp, dorsal surface; 16.
ovipositor, ventral view, partially extruded, 15, male:
spermapositor, ventral view.
208 REC. 8. AUST MOS 18 (Y); 199-122
1958a), In Northern temperate regions represented
by Zachvatkiniella and Amuracarus between 25°
and 50° Worth, and 40° and 150° East, in
mountainous country (Caucasus Mountains—Pm;
Nepal—Os; far eastern Siberia, east of Lake Baikal
and Sichote Alinja—Ps; Japan—Pc).
Remarks: I regard the relative lack of modifica-
tion of the female genital setae as the most
important attribute in diagnosing this subfamily.
When the four unnamed species from South Africa
referred to by Grandjean (1958a; 76) and probably
belonging to this subfamily, are better known they
may require changes in both the generic and
subfamilial groupings within the Acaronychidae.
The following 4 nominal genera are included in the
Archeonothrinae; Amuracarus Lange, 1975,
Archeonothrus Trigardh, 1906; Loftacarus n.gn.;
Zachvatkinelia Lange, 1954 (=Himalacarus Sheals,
1965).
LOFTACARUS n.gen.
Type-species: Loftacarus siefi n.sp.
Diagnosis: Archeonothrinae, On coxite ITV, 5§
setae including seta 7V3m. Opisthosternum with 2
setae in row Sg und 3 setae in row Sa. Proteronotal
shield absent, Hysteronotal setal pair J3 not on
single shield and bases not connected by thickened
strip of cuticle. Setae J4 and 44 om same shield. Seta
26 tapering from base and ciliate, Cheliceral fixed
digit With 6 or fewer teeth. Scta v present on
telofemur IL and 111, and genu [Il, so that these
segments carry 6, + and 4 setae respectively. Seta au
absent from basifemur TY, leaving only 2 setae,
Genu f with 2 solérnidia. Tarsus II with 2 solenidia of
which so 2. is very small.
Distribution; Southern temperate regions between
35° and 40° South (probably more extensive than
this), All records with original descriptions of
nominal species.
Remarks: Loftacarus appears most similar to
Amuracarus although it can be distinguished from it
by the two attributes given below. | have only seen
one diagnosis of Amuracarus (Lange 1975) which
quotes the authority of this name as ‘Lange, 1975”
but does not give a reference in the bibliography or
describe the single species, A, voskresenskii Lange,
1975. The description of L. longicaudatus is very
brief. It is grouped in Loftacarus rather than
Amuracarus because of the apparent absence of
both a proteronotal shield and a thickened cuticular
strip between the bases of setal pair J3.
The following 2 nominal species ate ineluded in
Loftacarus: L. longicaudatus (Balogh and Csiszar,
1963) n. comb., Argentina—NTe: L. stefi nsp.,
South Australia—Aa,
January. 198]
Loftacarus siefi n.sp.
Figs, 10-18
Female
General appearance and measurements: Dull
ivory-white, with shields and extremities of legs
tinged with pale brown, Extremities of chelicerac
and external malae, and most hysteronotal setae ate
pitch-black.. Most other setae are deep brown, A few
setae and claws pale brown, Idiosomal length 700 (2,
695 and 700); appendage lengths (for 700)—ch 47,5.
po 245, f 635, I 470, fH 465, TV 640: telofemur
breadths—pa 37.5. 185.0. 17 80.0, 7757.5, [TW 70.0.
Prosternum: Gnathosoma drawn [Fig. 13) ts
dorsoventrally squashed. Palp coxite seta cd shorter
but stouter than seta aol and lying just dorsal to
palp. Seta aol is simple and setose. Coxosternal seta
Id shorter but stouter than seta aol and lying just
dersal to leg 1, On coxite TY there is 4 median seta
(1V3m) in the distal whorl.
Proteronorum: Apodemes extend anteriorad from
setal bases j2 and s2, Proteronotal shield is absent.
Opisthosternum: Shields around genital orifice
only vaguely delineated. Describing genital setae ts
difficult because ovipositor only partially extruded.
All genital setae are slightly stouler at base than the
aggenital setae of file Jz. Setae del. mgl and mp2
are longer than the aggenital setae and appear to be
rigidly straight,
Hysteronotum: Shields not so clearly delineated as
drawn, Adaxial setae hardly fereshortened at all
because of the angle of their axes (Fig. 10),
Conspicuous apodeme at base of seta J3, Lurger
setae are ciliate.
Appendages: Movable cheliceral digit carries two
parallel rows of teeth, Setae: ch (2), pa (0-2-1-3-18),
T (0-4-G-5-6-39), IT (1-5-6-5-7-27), LIT (2-2-4-4-6-31),
TV (3-2-3-4-5-28), On tarsus [some ventral setae and
the d4 pair are plasmic setae, On tibia [, seta 1]
unusually slim and short, Solenidia: pa (0-0-1), 7 (2-
4-4), IT (1-2-2), TT (1-1-0), TV (1-2-0). Solenidium
so2 on tarsus VW is very small,
Eegs: None seen,
Male
Measurements and spermaposiror (otherwise as
female): [diosomal length 765(1). Spermapositor
hears 10 pairs of setose setae. All genital setae are
shorter than aggenital setae. Some genital setae in
file pe appear longer than other genital setae: it has
not been established whether this is true or if itis an
impression related to the angle of their axes.
Material examined: Holotype fernmale (N197646),
paratype female (N197647) and allotype male
(N197648), moss and litter under Eucalyptus
obliqua, sclerophyll forest, Mr. Lofty, 9.5.1974, D.
C. Lee.
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SOILS 209
Figs. 17-20—Appendages, 17 and 18, Loftacarus siefi n.sp.,
female: 17, legs, except for tibia I, dorsal setae on genua,
tibiae and tarsi; 18, telofemur IIT and genu III, all setae. 19:
zones of appendage surface. 20: Protoplophora palpalis
Berlese, tarsus IT,
Distribution: South Australia—Aa: Mt. Lofty,
sclerophyll forest, 3(2/8),
Remarks: The other member of the genus,
Loftacarus longicaudatus, is known only by attri-
butes of the notum. There are a few apparent
differences in the relative sizes of its notal setae and
those of L. siefi, on which they appear somewhat
shorter and stouter. The best diagnostic attribute is
that seta 21 is longer on L. siefi, being about
0-75 x the distance between setal bases Z1 and J1,
while on L. longicaudatus Z1 is about 0-25 x this
distance.
Family PALAEACARIDAE Grandjean
Palaeacaridae Grandjean, 1932b: 426.
Ctenacaridae Grandjean, 1954a: 428, n.syn.
Type-genus: Palaeacarus Tragardh, 1932, 2.
210
Diagnosis; Bifemorata, Gnathosternal seta aol
simple, ciliate or pectinate. Proteronotal shield
present and extensive cnough to carry all pro-
teronotal setae, No bilobed refractile lining to a
recess under rostrum, Some hysteranotal setae
conspicuously stouter than others, with seta #2
subequal to or longer than J3 and conspicuously
displaced forward (#1-22(JI-J2 = 0:25-0-5:1),
Ageenital file Ig with 7 setae of which Jgl is
hammer-like or claw-like. On tarsus [, seta dl distad
to solenidium sol or even so4, simple or lanceolate,
may be considerably shorter than sol, Tibia IT with 1
solenidium. Pretarsus with 2 or 3 claws, central claw
may or may not be less than quarter the length of
Jateral claws.
Remarks: Palaeacaridae, as presented here, newly
includes members of the Ctenacarinae; Grandjean,
1954e: 198, thereby further separating the latter
from the Adelphacarinae and Aphelacarinae, which
are here regarded as a single separate family (see
remarks on Bifemorata) But, as pointed out below
in the remarks on the Ctenacarinae, there are
similarities between it and the Adelphacaridae,
Possibly the Adelphacaridae should in the future
alsa be included under the Palaeacaridae, Of the twa
palaeacarid subfamilies only ctenacarines were
collected in the present study, so the Palaeacarinae
is briefly considered here. Palaeacarinae ineludes
two genera: Palaeacarus Tragardh, 1932 (= Tra-
gardhacarus Zachvatkin, 1945a) and Palaeacaroides
Lange, 1972. It ts known from the Holaarctic
Region.
Subfamily CTENACARINAE Grandjean
Ctenacaridae Grandjean, 1954a: 428.
Type-genus: Ctenacarus Grandjean, 1939.
Diagnosis: Palacacaridae, Internal mala consists
of a broad proximal half and a4 slim distal half, the
former carries all three adoral setae, with setal bases
ad2 and a3 posteriorad ta base of external mala.
Seta aol sparsely ciliate, cihate or pectinate. Seta d1
on tarsus T never Janceloate, is either tapering or
blunt ended and distad to solenidium so4-
Distribution; In the Northern temperate regions it
is known from an area bounded by Tangiers (Pm).
East Germany (Pe), Ukrainian S.S.R. (Pe),
Turkmen S.S.R. (Ps) and Japan (Pc), Also it
includes the only Bifemorata known from the tropics
(Brazil and Venezuala—NTb; Rhodesia—Ee) as
well as the below record from South Australia (Aa).
Remarks: Because of the long thick hysteronotal
setae 22 and J3 with 22 conspicuously displaced
forward. Clemacarus looks superficially like
Palaeacarus. This similarity is even stranger in other
ctenacarine genera with less extensive hysteronotal
shields and ciliate setae 22 and J3, But because of
similarities in the setae of tarsus I and in the internal
malae and oral setae, Ctenacanmae has in the past
REC, S. AUST. MUS L8 (9): 199-122
January, 198]
been grouped with the Adeliphacaridae, Here the
bysteranotal similanties and those of aggenital setae
Jgl are regarded as important enough to regard
Clenacarits as not only superficially similar to, but
infact more closely allied to Palaeacarus than
Adelphacarus or Aphelacarus. The genera in this
subfamily, especially Gilarovella and Neoctenacarus,
are quite similar ta each other, The following 4
nominal genera are included in the Ctenacarinae:
Beklemishevia Zachvatkin, 1945b, Crenacarus
Grandjean, 1939; Gilarovella Lange, 1974; Neac-
tenacarus Moritz, 1974.
CTENACARUS Grandjean
Crenacarus Grandjean, 1939: 543.
Type-species: Palaeacarus araneola Grandjean,
1932, by original designation.
Grandjeanacarus Zachvatkin, 1945b: 70.
Type-species: Palaeacarus araneala Grandjean,
1932. by original designation.
Diagnosis: Ctenacarinae. No ciliate hysteronotal
setae, Setae J3, Z2 and Z6 simple or have
inconspicuous paired hyaline flaps running parallel
to main setal axis. Seta J6 is leaf-like, having
conspicuous paired hyaline flaps. Setae J4, J5 and
Z5 subequal in length to Zl, Opisthosternal
chaetotaxy hypertrichous—e.g. 8Sg.
Distribution: Possibly cosmopolitan, only one
nominal species (so see ©, araneola distribution) but
may be another species in Oregon—Nc, Found on
ground, in dry or swampy environments, in sail
mosses and other low plants and in a termite nest,
Remarks: Crenacarus is easily distinguished from
other genera in the subfamily by the form of its
hysteronotal setae. Beklemishevia africanus
(Mahunka, 1974: 206) n.comb, from Rhodesia was
included in Ctenacarus. Tt is known only by
attributes of the notum, although the venter is
recorded as being as "“Grundtypus". It is not
confidently distinguishable from the type, and only
other known species, B. galeodula Zachyatkin,
19456. There is apparently a second, unnamed
species of Crenacarus from Oregon (Krantz, 1978:
475) on which the internal mala has an anterolateral
flap ventrally obscuring the base of a pilose rather
than a pectinate adoral seta aol,
The following 1 nominal species is included in
Ctenacarus: C. araneola (Grandjean, 1932b).
Ctenacarus araneola (Grandjean)
Figs, none
Palaeacarus araneala Grandjean, 1932b; 417,
Ctenacarus araneola (Grandjean); Grandjean.
1954c: 248.
Ctenacarus araneola (Grandjean): Mahunka, 1977;
464,
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SOILS 2
Male
Idiosomal length 315 (9, 290-320); appendage
lengths (for 320}—ch 17.5, pa 5. T 160, 17 110, I
115, FV 190; telofemur breadths—pa 12,5, £25,
20, TT 17,5, TV 20. Although movable cheliceral
digit is unusually short, the cheliceral digits are
robust and distally pitch-black. as are the tips of the
external malae, Hysteronotal setae J3, 22 and 76
have a narrow hyaline flap on each side as wide as
the diameter of the seta. In five specimens the
positor was recognised and it was as decribed for the
male (Grandjean 1954c: fig, 22E).
Material examined: Nine undesignated males
(N19761-N19769),, litter or mass and litter, under
Eucalyptus incrassata, mallee, Ferries-McDanald
Reserve, 20.6.1974, D.C. Lee.
Distribution: Venezuela (NTb), Brazil (NTb).
Morocco (Pm), Algeria (Pm), Japan (Pc). Kenya
(Ee). South Australia—Aa; Ferries -McDonald,
mallee-broombush open-scrubland, 9(2/8).
Remarks; Specimens referred to fit Grandjean’s
(1954c) description of this species except that three
other pairs of hysteronotal setae, besides. J6. have
hyaline flaps, This observation is considered here to
either reflect the improved microscopy of interfer-
enee contrast or an intraspecific variation. All nine
specimens are regarded as male because none
contained eggs and five apparently had sperma-
positors and were similar to the other four on which
the positars were not recognised.
Cohort PTYCTIMA
Remarks: The grouping of mites within this taxon
as by Balogh (1972) reflects a long standing
classification that is still widely held to, This is
despite apparently well supported conclusions by
Grandjean (1967, 1949) that the Piyctima includes
three groups more closely allied to other taxa than to
each other, Using Balogh's (1972) taxa these
conclusions can be summarised as follows: the
Protoplophoroidea are allied to the Sphaeroch-
thoniidae (Arthronota), the Mesoplophoroidea are
allied ta the Eniochthoniidae (Arthronota) whilst
the Phthiracaroidea and Euphthiracaroidea are
allied to the Collohmanniidae (Holonota). As stated
jn the introduction, | intend to try and reduce the
number of superfamilies and families in the
Cryptostigmata, If this is done, in combination with
partly following Grandjean’s (1969) later conclu-
sions, the classification becomes very unfamiliar
because the superfamily names in the Ptyctima tend
to have older authorities. Therefore, for the time
being, I am only following Grandjean’s (1967) first
change in the classification; the split of the Ptyctima
into two subcohorts, the Arthroptyctima and the
Euptyctima. In the next stage of this study, when
members of the Arthronota and Holonota are
described, J will try and reach a decision about
Grandjean’s (1969) later conclusions. It is passible
that the Ptyctima should be disbanded and its
members grouped in both the Arthronota and
Holoneta,
Subcohort ARTHROPTYCTIMA
Diagnosis; Ptyctima, Hysteronotal shield divided
into separate anterior and posterior parts, but
sometimes. (Mesoplophoridae) posterior hys-
teronotal shield reduced and difficult to distinguish
from ventral shields. Anterior hysteronotal shield
carries only four to eight pairs of setae. When
posterior hysteronoral shield inconspicuous there 1s
an unbroken transverse shield between the genital
and anal smeld, On palp coxite, seta cd spine-like
and less than X 0:25 length of 2. Genua of all
appendages with either no or 1 solenidium. Nymphs
ptychoid with tigid shields, although not always
distributed as on adult-
Remarks; The aboye diagnosis includes the
Protoplophoroidea Grandjean, 1965 and Meso-
plophoroidea van der Hammen, 1959 as used by
Balogh (1972). These superfamilies are maintained
here because of Grandjean’s (1967, 1969) conclu-
sions, mentioned above, that they are each allied to
one of two quite distinct groups within the
Arthronota. The Protoplophoraidea includes one
family which is considered belaw because one of its
species was collected in the present study. The
Mescplophorocidea is considered briefly here.
Grandjean (1965) regards this superfamily as allied
to the Hypochthonioidea amongst the Arthranota,
partly because of the striking resemblance between
the unusual gnathosternum af Mesoplophora Bet-
lese, 1904. and that of Hypochthoniella Berlese, 1910
(= Enioechthonius Grandjean), Grandjean (1965)
also grouped a poorly known genus, Archoplophora
van der Hammen, in the Mesoplophoroidea, but in a
distinct family. Although the gnathosternum of
Archoplophora is not described and the genital and
anal shields only resemble those of the nymphs of
Mesoplophora, the hysteronotal structure and
setation with a lack of pleural shields provisionally
groups it clase to Mesoplophora. Members of
Mesoplophora look superficially like small Eup-
tyctima, but with anal and genital plates similar to
the Brachypylina, rather than members of the
Macropylina. The similarity to the Euptyctima is
because they appear to have a single, undivided
hysteronotal shield, with no ability to fold up
posteriorly, and a proteronotal shield which folds
downward to cover only a distinct anterior forward-
facing section of the genital shield, without any
pleural shields to provide lateral protective wings to
the join. On the other hand, the reduced
212 REC. $, AUST. MUS 18 (9). 199-122
hysteronotal chaetotaxy (8 setal pairs) indicates that
the hysteronotal shield is homologous with only the
anterior part of the hysteronotal shield of the
Euptyctima. This supports the concept of an
Arthronota-like ancestor, able to fold up the
posterior part of the hystێrosoma, which has since
lost this ability because of the posterior hysteronotal
shield being reduced and merged with the ventral
shields. | am postponing an evaluation of the degree
of alliance between the Protoplophoroidea and
Mesoplophioroidea until a later stage in this study
when the Arthonota have been considered.
Family PROTOPLOPHORIDAE Ewing
Prataplapherinae Ewing, 1917: 199,
Type-genus, Protoplophora Berlese, 1910,
Diagnosis: Arthroptyctima. Hysteronotum clearly
divided into at Jeast 2 articulated shields, the
posterior shield capable of moving up under the
anterior shield, Anterior hysteronatal shield carries
4 pairs (J1, Z1, $1, $2) or 6 pairs (plus inconspicuous
J2 and 22) of setae. Large pleural shields cover
space between proteronotal and genital shields when
mite folded up. Genital shield flat but inclined
dorsalwards from plane of anal shield and
completely covered by proteronotal shield when
mite folded up. If adanal shield separates genital and
anal shields it is divided mid-ventrally into 2 parts.
Pretarsus with 2 or 3 claws which may be unusually
long, Palp genu carrying seta d. All genua Without a
solenidium, External mala is spatulate, broadening
out distally to hyaline flap.
Remarks: The protoplophorids are unusual in
being able to fold up their bodies posteriorly as well
as anteriorly, Van der Hammen (1959) indicates that
Berlese’s. protoplophorids, a major part of the
known family, are insufficiently described. The most
informative work is the redescription of Aedo-
plophora glomerata and Cryptoplophora abscondiia
by Grandjean (1954b). The classification is further
confused because of the similarity between nymphs
and adults and the possiblity that some attributes
used to diagnose taxa, such as nurmber of
hysteronotal divisions or sutures, vary between these
stages. With the exception of Proteplophora, all
genera are recorded in tropical latitudes, only the
tecord of Crypreplophora abscondita from Algeria
(Pm) is elsewhere, The extraordinary long claws of
some species suggest that they may sometimes live
on other animals, The following 6 nominal genera
are included in the Protoplopharidae: Aedaplophora
Grandjean, 1932a; Arthroplophora Berlese, 1910;
Crypioplaphora Grandjean, 19324; Hauseroplophora
Mahunka, 1977; Protoplophora Berlese, 1910;
Prototritia Berlese, 1916.
January, L98]
PROTOPLOPHORA Berlese
Protoplophora Berlese, 1910: 217.
Type-species; Pratoplophora palpalis Berlese, 1910.
by original designation,
Diagnosis: Protoplopharidae, Anterior hys-
teranatal shield carries 4 pairs of simple setae.
Posterior hysteronotal shields carry 8 pairs of simple
setae. Posterior hysteronotal shield either with twa
hinged divisions just posteriorad to setae J3, 23 and
J4, Z4 so that there are three articulating parts, or
these two divisions reduced to a suture not extending
to lateral margins. Lateral margins of adanal shields
approximately parallel so that they meet a wide
anterior margin to enclose almost a right angle. Gna
chelicera, seta ch2 simple and setose, On palp, distal
setae shorter than tarsus. Pretarsal claws on legs less
than x 0-5 tarsal! length, Palp with 5 segments and
relatively long (X 0-66 length of leg I),
Distribution: Previously known mainly from
around western mediterranean between latitudes 30°
and 40 North. The record below from South
Australia js within the equivalent southern latitudes.
Also recorded fram Central Asia.
Found on ground in humus, litter and moss.
Remarks; Van der Hammen (1959) was of the
opinion thal since Berlese (1910) did not mention
characters on the ventral surface of the type of
Protoplophora, it is impossible to decide whether or
not the specimen described by Grandjean (1932a)
belongs to this genus. In contrast, [ consider that
enough attributes of the type are known (more than
one hysteronotal division, simple hysteranotal
setae—noat hypertrichous, long palp without long
distal setae, short claws) for Grandjean’s grouping
of his specimen in Proteplophora to be accepted.
The following 2 nominal species are included in
Protoplophora; P, bivaginata Grandjean, 1932a, P.
palpalis Berlese, 1910,
Protoplaphora palpalis Berlese
Fig. 20
Protoplophora palpalis Berlese, 1910: 217.
Protoplophora palpalis Berlese: Grandjean,
L932a; 24.
Adult
Idiosomal length 185 (3, L85-190); appendage
lerigths (for 190)—ch 16, pa 40, 160, IT 57.8, WT S0,
IVS; femur breadths—pa 5, 713. 1710, 179, TV 9,
Proteranotal seta 22 broadly lanceolate and in its
normal drooping position the surface away from the
proteronotum carries a raw of inconspicuous. cilia,
One specimen (N197610) has a recognisable positor
with at least four pairs of setae and there are only
1wa pairs of genital papillae. It also has three clearly
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SOTLS
delineated parts to the posterior hysteronotal shield
which appear to be capable of telescoping up to
overlap each other. Chelicerae have three teeth on
fixed digit and one tooth on movable digit, and setae
chl and chZ are inconspicuous and setose. The
external mala is spatulate with a long stalk (X 0.6
total length) anda pyriform hyaline flap distally. All
the legs are tridactyl (Fig, 20) with a refractile,
curved central claw and hyaline, slim and almost
straight lateral claws,
Material examined: Three undesignated adults
(N197610-N197612), litter. under Eucalyptus incras-
sata, mallee, Ferries-McDonald Reserve, 20.6.1974,
D.C Lee.
Distribution; Sicily (Pm). Spain (Pm), Central Asia
(Ps). South Australia—Aa: Ferries-McDonald,
mallee-broombrush open-scrubland, 3(1/8),
Remarks: The specimens referred to here fit the
desctiption of the specimen from Spain by
Grandjean (1932a) rather than the type. On the
basis of the standard of the descriptions this may
only indicate that Berlese (1910) was not so
accurate. The fact that both authors represent their
specimens as monodactyl is also regarded here as as
inaccurate, resulting from the smallness of the mite
and the use of only bright field rather than the more
revealing interference contrast illumination, But it is
possible that three distinct species are represented.
Subcohort EUPTYCTIMA
Diagnosis; Ptyctima. Hysteronotal shield un-
divided and carrying at least 12 pairs of setae,
Genital and anal shields either fused together or
abut onto each other. On palp coxite, seta ed setose
and more than X 0.25 length af ¢2, Palp with 3 ta 5
segments, if genu present it does notearry any setae,
Genu I carries 2 solenidia. Nymphs are not ptychoid
and. lack shields,
Remarks: Balogh (1972) follows Grandjean
(1967) and also Walker (1965) in regarding this
group as made up of four families. three of which are
grouped jnto one superfamily (Euphthiracaroidea)
leaving the other family in the Phthiracaroidea, This
grouping has been tollawed here except that the
superfamilies have been reranked as families and the
families as subfamilies.
Family PHTHIRACARIDAE Perty
Phthiracarea Perty, 1841: 574.
‘Type-genus; Phihiracarus Perty, 1841.
Diagnosis: Buptyctima, Clearly delineated pairs
of genital and anal shields, with the grestest width of
each of these 4 shields more than X 0-4 their length.
Lateral hysteronotal gland absent, On tarsus 1,
213
inconspicuous seta dF coupled to distal face of
solenidium so4. Bothridium has associated internal
tubes. Proteronotal setal file s with one seta. Palp
with 3 segments. Lay epgs containing strongly
sculptured, pigmented prelarvae.
Remarks: Following a computer-assisted Gowers
Principal Co-ordinates Analysis to study phenetic
affinity amongst 39 phthiracarid species, Sheals
(1969) concluded that this family included a
comparatively homogeneous group. The species
used represented five of the eight phthiracarid
genera listed by Balogh (1972). Sheals (1969)
indicated that there might be two clusters, one
representing Phihiracarus Perty and one
Steganacarus Ewing or similar genera, Untartu-
nately, the species collected in this study is
diagnosable as Haplophthiracarus, members of
which are placed between the two clusters, nearer to
one or the other,
HOPLOPHTHIRACARUS Jacot
Hoplophthiracarus Jacot, 1933: 239,
Type-species; Hoplederma — histricinum
L908, by original designation.
Berlese,
Diagnosis: Proteronatal seta j2 erect and subequal
in length or Jonger than seta JJ, Hysteronotum
usually dimpled, carrying 15-18 pairs of setae, with
only 3 pairs of pores and without conspicuous dorsal
apophyses. Notal setae either tapering ot parallel
sided except for a ciliate tip, Anal shields carrying 2
pairs of setae in file Ja and 3 pairs of setae in file Za,
At most, only 3 pairs of setae (file Ja and seta 4a3)
on median margin of anal shield, Seta Za2 is the
longest Seta on anal shield. Femur | carries 4 setae,
and genu IV curries 1 seta. On tibia [V. seta d may
be either longer than seta 1 and uncoupled, or much
smaller and coupled to a solenidium.
Distribution: Cosmopolitan. Na; NTb, NTo; Em;
Pe, Pm, Ps, Pe; Os; Aa, Ap; Sk, The Antarctic is the
only major region from which Hoplophthiracarys has
nat been recorded,
Found in soil, litter, moss and grass. Members of
the genus have been recorded in substantial numbers
from widely different environments such as Sphae-
nuni-fens, deciduous and coniterous forests and high
altitude Rhododendron-thickets,
Remarks: Hoplophthiracarus is a ditficult genus ta
diagnose. Three of the earliest named species,
including the type, are poorly known so it is not
certain that the diagnosis presented above includes
the entire range of attributes amongst species
grouped here in the genus, Van der Hammen (1959)
considered that Hoplophthiracarus is reminiscent of
Steganacarus and that possibly it is only an artificial
unit. On the other hand, Macfarlane and Sheals
214
(1965) indicate that, at that time, Hoplophthiracarus
was only distiguished from Phihiracarus by having
nearly erect interlamellar (/2) setae. Sheals (1969)
included four species of Hoplophthiracarus in his
study of phenetic affinity amongst phthiracarids. He
found a close affinity between H. nepalensis and
species of Atroapacarus Ewing (in the Streganacarus-
complex), The remaining three species (H, costai, an
unnamed species from France and another from
Argentina) were fairly widely scattered between the
Hoplophorella Berlese cluster (in the Steganacaris-
complex) and the Phthiracarus cluster, Sheals (1969)
concluded that ‘tas defined at present, the genus
Hoplaphthiracarus is not a natural group” and any
resajution of the problem by making a noamenc-
latural division would require a study of the type of
the genus.
One attribute often used to distinguish
phthiracarid genera, flattness as opposed ta the
protrusion of the anal shields, has not been included
in the abave diagnosis. This is because the species
described below has a mainly flat anal shield but
with a protruding median margin (Fig, 28), which in
some preserved specimens does not protrude
downwards beyond the ventral margins of the
hysteronotal shields, whilst in other specimens it
conspicuously protrudes,
Two species, Phthiracarus hamatus Hammer,
1973 from the Tonga Islands—Ap and P. tubulus
Hammer, 1972 from Tahiti—Ap, not included in
Hoplophthiracarus, should be considered as possibly
congeneric with species in this genus, The following
17 nominal species are included in Hoploph-
thiracarus; H. cavernosus Wallwork, 1977; H.
cazanicus Feider and Calugar, 1969; H. castai
Maefarlane and Sheals, 1965; H, dactyloscopicus
Mahunka, 1978b: A. grossmani Jacoi, 1933, HA.
histricinus (Berlese, 1908); H. kugohi Aaki, 1959; H.
minus (Krivolutsky, 1965); H. nepalensis Sheals,
1965; H. paludis Jacot. 1938: H. pavidus (Berlese,
1913)—tredescribed by van der Hammen, 1963; H.
regalis Mahunka, 1978a; H- rebustiar Jacot, 1933; H-
shealsi n.sp.; H. siamensis Aoki, 1965; H. variolosa
(Berlese, 1888); H, zebra Balogh, 1962. There is 1
nominal subspecies: H. histricinus nitidior (Berlese
1923),
Hoplophthiracarus shealsi n,sp,
Fig, 21-34
Female
General appearance and measurements; Dull,
straw-coloured or orange; darker specimens usually
partially covered in a thin adhering layer of debris.
Refractile parts (external malac, cheliceral
extremities, setae and claws) paler than general
integument. Much of soma covered in shallow
REC. 8. AUST. MUS 18 (9): 199-122
January, L981
dimples, whilst legs with very much smaller
(approximately X 0,05) dimples. As well as the
withdrawal of the legs and folding down of the
proteronotal shield, the anal and genital shields vary
in their degree of protrusion below the lateral
margins of the hysteronotal shield. Hysteronotal
length 600 (25, 550-665) and proteronotal length 301
(25, 270-345); appendage lengths (for 660 and 345
containing one prelarya)—ch 90, pa 120, J 260,
240, 117230, IV 230: femur breadth—pa 17.5, 140, 1
32,5, 10 27.5, IV 275.
Prosternum: External malae lie in a vertical plane
when in a natural position (as Fig, 31) rather than
tending towards lying in a horizontal plane as when
squashed (as Fig. 22). Gnathosternal setae slightly
ciliate, those in file ao stouter and more ciliate,
especially setae dol and ao? (Fig, 32). Small
sclerotized samal shield dorsal to where coxa J]
abuts onto coxa 11), Coxal seta I1pis inconspicuous.
Proteromotum; Seta z2 has rows of cilia distally on
ventral surface (Fig. 33) which is exposed outwards
and upwards when curled urcund in its natural
position (Fig. 21), Three lang hyaline bothridial
tubes curled over distally, possibly some similar but
short tubes also attached to bothridial chafnber (Fig.
33).
Opisthostermnum: Exposed anterior anal apophysis
extends from left shield in all type specimens.
Anterior forward facing diaxial flap of genital shield
carries four setae in file Jg, while Jg5 is an exposed
ventral surface (Fig. 29). In the drawing (Fig. 25) the
diaxial flap is squashed so that setal file Jgno longer
appears vertical. Furthermore, by comparing these
figures it can be seen that setae in file Jg are much
slimmer and more tapered in appearance under a
light microscope as compared with an electron
microscope, The two sides of both the genital and
anal shield also has a thickening which fits into a
notched tuberosity on the mid-venter of the
posterior margin of the hysteronotum. The anterior
pair of genital papillae are less than half the size of
the posterior two pairs. The oyipositor carries 16
setac. amongst which two pairs are regarded as
belonging to a file pg which has migrated distally, so
that seta pe2 is level with Migl (Fig. 25).
Hysteronotum: A zone ventralwards of seta R is
free of dimples (Fig. 28). The 15 pairs of setae do not
taper and are ciliate distally. No vestiges of setae J4
and Z4 were observed, Only three pairs of pores. in
file hf, hft apparently absent,
Appendages: Fixed cheliceral digit distally carries
two parallel rows of teeth, Setae: ch (2), pa (--1-6), 1
(3-1-4-2-5-17), I (O-1-3-2-3-12), IIT (1-2-2-1-2-L0),
TV (1-2-1-1-2-10). Solenidia; pa (--0-1), I (2-1-3), IT
(1-1-2), HI (1-1-0), TV (0-1-0). Seta d1 on tarsus 1 is
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SOILS 215
100um
23,26
22, 24, 25
2)
Figs. 21-26—Hoplophthiracarus shealsi n.sp. 21-25, female; 21,
soma excluding prosternum, 22, gnathosternum; 23, part left
palp, dorsal surface; 25, left chelicera, anterior surface. 25,
right genital shield and ovipositor, 26, male: spermapositor.
regarded as having migrated distally to just Eggs: Amongst 25 type females, 12 contain 0
proximad of solenidium so 3. Legs monodactyl, all prelarvae in eggs (although some with clear patch
claws have two ventral spines on proximal half, possibly representing developing eggs), 10 contain 1
tw
a
REC, §. AUST, MUS 18 (9): 199-122
January, 1981
Fig. 27—Hoplophthiracarus shealsi n.sp., legs, dorsal setae on
genua, tibiae and tarsi,
prelarva, three contain 2 prelarvae. Prelarvae about
220m long and similar to that described for
Hoplophthiracarus pavidus by van der Hammen
(1963).
Male
Measurements and spermapositor (otherwise as
female): Hysteronotal length 485 (25, 425-545) and
proteronotal length 250 (25, 210-280), Sperma-
positor carries 10 setae which are relatively even in
length compared to those on the ovipositor.
Material examined: Holotype female (N197649), 24
paratype females (N197650-N197673), allotype male
(N197674) and 24 paratype males (N197675-
N197698), litter under Pinus pinea, Knott Hill
Forest, 22,5.1974, D. C. Lee. Sixteen undesignated
goldcoated specimens on stub ARAS2, as above
except collected on 24.11.1976,
Knott
Mt,
Hill,
Lofty,
Distribution: South Australia—Aa:
cultivated pine forest, 319 (2/2);
sclerophyll forest, 2 (2/8).
Remarks: The diagnosis of this species is difficult
because of the inadequate description of some
previously named species. If the descriptions of the
latter are accurate as far as they go, H. shealsican be
recognised by possessing the following five groups of
attributes: 1—hysteronotal shield dimpled, without
numerous long furrows, also lacks a conspicuous
pair of posterior concavities each side of a knob-like
protruberance opposing posterior edges of anal
shields; 2—15 pairs of blunt, distally ciliate
hysteronotal setae; 3—solenidium on tibia IV
coupled with a small dorsal seta; 4—aggenital setae
of file Jg in a straight vertical line; 5—of the two
shorter adanal setae in file Za, Zal subequal in
length to aggenital setae (X 0.9-1.1)and Za3
subequal in length to setae in file Ja (X 0.9-1.1). The
setal alignment of file Jg in a straight vertical line is
only otherwise described on H, cavernosus amongst
species of Hoplophthiracarus, although it does occur
on Notophthiracarus australis Ramsay, 1966, from
New Zealand—An. If further studies support the
uniqueness of this species, then it may be that it is
endemic to Australia although occurring in large
numbers only in the litter of an introduced conifer. It
should also be noted that based on the two
characters used by Sheals (1969) to distinguish the
two groups into which he divides his four species of
Hoplophthiracarus, H. shealsi, by having both 15
pairs of hysteronotal setae and a coupled solenidium
on tibia IV, has one diagnostic attribute of each
group.
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SOILS
Figs,
28-32—Hoplophthiracarus
shealsi female: 28,
n.sp,,
hysteronotal, genital and anal shields, «140; 29, anterior
genital shields as indicated in Fig. 28, x2100; 30, mid-venter
where anal and genital shields abut, «1400; 31, anterior
proteronotum and gnathasternum, x 700; 32, parts of right
internal and external malae, x3500.
Family EUPHTHIRACARIDAE Jacot
Euphthiracarini Jacot, 1930: 214.
Type-genus: Euphthiracarus Ewing, 1917.
Diagnosis: Euptyctima. Genital and anal shields
may or may not be separated from ventral shield by
a suture, but in both cases lateral margin of ventral
shields unbroken for entire length of opisthoster-
num, Lateral hysteronotal gland present or absent.
On tarsus I, seta d3 conspicuous and not coupled to
a solenidium. Bothridium may have associated
internal filaments or, rarely, internal tubes.
Proteronotal setal file s with 1 or 2 setae. Palp with
3, 4 or 5 segments. Either lay eggs with or without
ornate chorion, or containing a strongly sculptured,
pigmented prelarvae.
Remarks: The results of a computer-assisted
Gower’s Principal Co-ordinates Analysis of phenetic
affinity amongst 53 Euptyctima species indicated
that the Euphthiracaridae is not so homogeneous as
the Phthiracaridae, since the first generic separation
occurs at the 74 per cent rather than the 90 per cent
phenon line (Sheals, 1969). In that study the 14
species of euphthiracarid, representing 7 genera,
separate into three groups at the 74 per cent phenon
line: two within Oribotritinae, one within Euph-
thiracarinae. Therefore, it appears preferable to
follow Markel (1964) and group ‘non-phthiracarid’
Euptyctima in one family, but maintain subfamilies
equivalent to the families listed in Walker (1965).
The Oribotritiinae Grandjean, 1954a and Synichot-
ritiinae Walker, 1965 have not been collected in the
present study, while the other subfamily is
considered below.
218 REC, S. AUST.
33-36—Ventral
Figs.
Subfamily EUPHTHIRACARINAE Jacot
Euphthiracarini Jacot, 1930: 214
Type-genus: Euphthiracarus Ewing, 1917.
Diagnosis: Euphthiracaridae. Anal shield with
anterior triangular corrugated area. Anogenital
suture present but often limited to breadth of
corrugated triangle. Anal and genital shields fused
with ventral shield so that no line of demarcation
separates them. Lateral hysteronotal gland present.
Palp with 3 segments, Lay eggs with ornate chorion
or a smooth chorion and containing a larva.
RHYSOTRITIA Markel and Meyer
Rhysotritia Markel and Meyer, 1959: 329.
MUS 18 (9): 199-122
view of setae
January, 1981
a %
z2 and podosterna.
Hoplophthiracarus shealsi n.sp., female: 33, seta z2 plus
associated bothridial structures; 34, coxae and trochanters I-
IV. Rhysotritia wallworki n.sp., female: 35, seta z2 plus
associated bothridial structures; 36, coxae and trochanters I-
IV,
Type-species: Hoplophora ardua C. L. Koch, 1841,
by original designation.
Diagnosis: Bothridial flap dorsal to seta 22,
Distance between setal bases j2-j2 less than twice
distance between setal bases j2-z2, Seta j2
approximately twice as long as jl. On genital shields,
between 7 and 11 pairs of setae, Posterior
corrugations on anal shields. Pore Zaf subcircular
and never nearer triangular corrugated area than it is
to seta Zal. Seta Jal recognisable but small. Setae
Ja2 and Ja3 shorter than Zal and Za2. On genu IV,
no solenidium.
Distribution: Widespread. NTc; Pe, Ps; Aa, Ap.
Species from North America, previously included in
Rhysotritia, are now grouped in Microtritia Markel,
1964.
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) DF SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SOILS
Found in decaying wood, humus and moss. A
number of ecological studies indicate some members
of this genus occur in the deeper more compact
layers of the lawer fermentation zone and the upper
part of the humus zone, whilst some species of
Phthiracaridae occur in zanes above them.
Remarks; One attribute used by Balogh (1972) to
distinguish Rhysotritia is not comprehensive enough
because R, clavata sextiana has only one pair of
setae on both trochanters III and ['V. The diagnosis
used here is based on that of Markel (1964),
The following 4 nominal species are included in
Rhysotritia: R. ardua (Koch, 1841), R. calvata
Markel, 1964; R, duplicata (Grandjean, 1953); R,
wallworki n.sp. There are 4 nominal sub-species! R,
ardua otaheitensis Hammer, 1972; R. ardua
penicillata Pérez-Inigo, 1969; R. calvata sextiana
Lions, 1966; R, duplicata limbara (Markel and
Meyer, 1959).
Rhysotritia wallworki n.sp,
Fig. 35-42
Female
General appearance and measurements; Dull,
ivary-white with pinkish edges to shields. Refractile
parts (external malae. cheljcera] extremities, setae
and claws) paler than general integument. Most of
soma covered by fine pores (Fig, 41), Hysteronotal
length 390 (5, 360-415) and proteronotal length 240
(5, 225-255); appendage lengths (for 410 and 245),
ch 60, pa 97.5, F185, 1 170, TN 167.5, IV 167.5;
femur breadth—pa 15.5, T 37.5, 1 27.5, IT 25, IV
22.5
Prosternum: External malae are curved, tending to
form a cylinder around the chelicerae. Only seta cd
on gnathosoma appears to be even slightly ciliate.
Long sclerotized somal. shield dorsal] to and between
coxae IJ and Ul. Coxa [ as drawn (Fig, 36) is
swivelled round so that anterior surface is facing
ventralwards.
Proteronotum; Seta 22 has rows of cilia distally on
ventral surface (Fig, 35) which is exposed forwards
and outwards when curled around in its natural
position (Fig, 37), A number of granular filaments
extend inwards from bothridial chamber (Fig. 35)
and disappeared when cleared, Presumably these
are ‘'tracheoles’. From their appearance in this
species it is possible that they are the outer layers of
a series of tubes. Only two ridges radiate forward
fram bothridium.
Opisthosternum: Small anterior forward facing
diaxial flap on genital shield. All setae in file Jg are
in a straight horizontal line inside grooyes on
opposing faces of midventral division between
219
genital shields. There are small interlocking
corrugations at posterior end of anal shield.
Qvipositor carries 12 setae; apparently file pg is
unrepresented. The positor is assumed female
because of the large size of the setae in file dg (Fig.
40).
Hysteronotum: The 14 pairs of setae are slighty
ciliate and tapered, The fine pores represented by
spots (Fig, 41) show up as lines in profile, passibly
being narrow ducts running as deep as the Jong outer
chambers at the setal bases. Five pairs of pores in file
hf, with a conspicuous duct to hysteranotal gland
opening near hf3.
Appendages; Chelicerae with relatively small
teeth. Setae: ch (2), pa (-2-8), J (5-1-3-3-5-17), IT (0-
1-3-3-4-13), U1 (2-2-2-23-11), TV (3-2-1-1-2-9).
Solenidia: pa (--0-1), F (2-1-3), (1-1-2), 17G-1-0),
TV (0-1-0), All solenidia on genua and tibiae are
coupled with a dorsal seta, but the bases of the
couples appear to be discrete rather than merged as
in Hoplophthiracarus shealsi described above, Seta
dl on tarsus I is stout with annular wrinkles and is
regarded as having migrated distally to be level with
solenidjium so4, The setal pair avl and pvl on tarsus
II are absent, Each pretarsus with a single claw
having 2 inconspicuous ventral spines on proximal
half.
Male
Unknown.
Material examined: Holotype female (N197699), 2
Paratype females (N1976100 and N1976101), litter
under Acacia sophorae, Piccaninnie Ponds Reserve,
3/7/1974, D. C. Lee. Two paratype females
(1976102 and N1976103) litter and grass under
Eucalyptus viminalis, Chambers Gully, 12/6/1974,
D. C, Lee.
Distribution: South Australia-Aa: Piceaninnie
Ponds, coastal shrubland, 3{2/8); Chambers Gully,
savannah woodland, 2(1/8).
Remarks: Considering the similarity between the
species of this genus and the relatively substantial
differences between some subordinate subspecies
and their type subspecies, itis difficult to decide how
to classify new material. R. wallworki can be clearly
distinguished from R. duplicata which is tridactyl,
has an extra ridge runming forward from dorsal
margin of bothridial flap, and setae aul and pvl
present on tarsus Il. R. ardua differs in being either
bidactyl or tridactyl and having a slim seta 22, On
the other hand R, clavaia is similar, hut R,
wallworki is distinguished by four attributes: longer
cilia on notal setae including z2, 11 pairs of setae on
the genital shields, only a very indistinct notch in the
bothridial flap and 17 setae on tarsus I, But it should
be noted. that two of the characters involved, the
220
REC, S. AUST. MUS 18 (9): 199-122
Figs, 37-42—Rhysotritia wallworki n.sp., female: 37, soma,
excluding prosternum; 38, left chelicera, anterior surface; 39,
gnathosternum; 40, right anogenital shield plus partially
extruded ovipositor; 41, hysteronotal seta J3; 42, dorsal setae
on genua, tibiae and tarsi.
January, 1981
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) GF SOUTH ALISTRALIAN SOLLS 721
setation of the genital shield and tarsus I, vary within
the species R, clavaia (including R.c.sextiana),
although nor to the extent of overlapping with R,
wallworki.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
1 am indebted to the Interim Council of the
Australian Biological Resources Study tor funds for
equipment, and to the Mark Mitchell Research
Foundation and to the Science and Industry
Endowment Fund for funds for travel in connection
with this project. Two species, Sromacarus abresi
and Loftacarus siefi, have names based’ on actonyms
for two of these funding bodies.
Special thanks are due to Dr J. G. Sheals for
arranging bench space for me at the British Museum
(Natural History), London, and to Dr J, A,
Wallwork, Westfield College, London, for advice in
the initial stage of this project. Thanks are also due
to Dr B, G. M, Jamieson, University of Queensland,
Brisbane lor commenting on the manuscript.
My greatest debt of gratitude is to Ms Linda
Blesing for preparing some drawings (Figs. 1-9) and
to Ms Jenni Thurmer for preparing most drawings
(Figs. 10-42), Thanks ure also due to Ms Jan Forrest
for preparing the photographic prints and ta Ms
Debbie Meltoy for typing this manuseript-
REFERENCES
s
AOKI, J. 1959, Die Monsmilben (Gribatei) aus Su tjapan, Bull.
hipgeogr, Soe. Japan 21: 1-22,
AOKT. F. 1965. Oribatiden (Acarina) Thajlands, 1. Namre Life
Southeast Asia 42 129-193.
BALOGH, Jf 1962. New Oribatids from Madagascar (Acari),
Annis hist,-nat. Mus. nam. hurtg. (Zoal.) 34: 419-427.
BALOGH, J. 1972, The oribatid genera of the worl!. Akademiai
Kiado, Budapest [88 pp. 7) pis.
BALOGH, J, and CSISZAR, J. 1963. The Zoologi al Results of
Gy. Topal’s Collectings in South Argentina. 5. Oribarei
caring). Annis hist.-nat, Mus, nam. hung. (Zool. ) 5§:463-
485,
BERLESE, A, 1888. Acari Austro-Americani quos collegit
Aloysius Ralzan. Boll, Soc, et. ital. 20: 171-222,
BERLESE, A, 1904. Acari quovi. Manipulus TIL, Redia 2: 10-32.
BERLESE, A. 1908 Elenea di generi e specie nuave di Acari
Redia 5: 1-15.
BERLESE, A. 1910. Acari nuovi. Manipulus VY. VI. Redia 6:
199-234,
PEREESS, A, 1913. Acari nuovi. Manipoli VII-VIN Redia 9;
“lth.
RERRESE- “& INI6. Centuna prima di Acari nuovi, Redia ¥2:
-67,
BERLESE, A, 1923. Centuria sesta di Acari nuoyi, Redia LS:
237-262.
EVANS, G. O. 1963. Observations on the chaetoraxy of the legs
inthe free-living Gamasina (Acari; Mesostigmata), Bull. Br.
Mus, nai, Hist, (Zool,) 10; 277-303.
EWING, H, E, 1917 A synopyis of the genera of beetle mites
with special reference to the North American fauna, Ann,
ent. Soc. Am. 1: 117-132.
FIEDER, Z.. and CALUGAR, M. 1969. Chetolaxia piciowrelor
Ja speciile genurilor Phthiracarus si Hoplophthiracarus
(Oribates), din Rom&nia. Anal. Stiint. Univ, ‘Al, lL Cuza'
(Sect. 2A) US; 1-6, 6 pls,
GRANDIEAN, F. 1932a, La famille des Protoplophoridae
(Acariens). Bull. Soe. zool, Fr. 572 10-36,
GRANDJBAN, F. 1932b, Au sujer des Palaecariformes
Tragardh. Bull, Mus, natn. Hist. nar, Paris (2)4: 411-426.
GRANDIEFAN, F. 1935, Les poils et les organes sensitifs portes
par Jes partes etle palpe chez les Oribates. Bull, Soc. seel, Pr.
60; 6-39.
GRANDJBAN, F 1939, L-evolution des ongles chez les Oribates
(Acariens). Bull. Mus. nain- Hist. nal. , Paris (2) 11= 539-546.
GRANDJEAN, F. 1940s, Observalions sur les Oribates (13°
serie), Bull, Mfus. nam, Hist. mar., Pariy (2) £2: 62-69,
GRANDIEAN. F. 1940b. Les poils et les organes sensitif pores
par les pattes ctle palpe chez Ics oribates, Deuxiéme partie
Bull. Soc, zool. Pe 6S: 32-44.
GRANDIEAN, F, 19524 Observahons sur les Palaeacaroides
(Acariens) (I série), Bull. Mus. nam. Hist. nat,, Paris (2)
24; 3-367.
GRANDIEAN, F. 1952b, Observations sur les Palacacaroides
(2° série), Bull, Mus, nam Hist nat., Paris (2) 24; 460-467_
GRANDIEAN, F., 1953, Observations sur les Oribates (25°
série). Bull. Mus. natn. Hise. nat, Purig (2) 25= 185-162.
GRANDIEAN, F. 1954a. Exssuj de classitication des Oribates
(Acariens) Bull, Soc, zoel, Fr, 782 421-440.
GRANDIJEAN, F. 1954b, Les Enarthronota (Acariens) (4°
série), Annis, Sct, nat, Zvol. (11) We: 311-335.
GRANDIEAN, F. J0Sdce, Prude sor Jes Pulaeseuroides
(Acariens. Orihates). Mém. Mus. aain. Aish, nat, Paris
(N.S.), x6f A. Zool. P= 179-274.
GRANDIEAN, F, 1957. Observations sur jes Palueacarpides (4°
série), Bull, Mus. nam. Hist, nan, Parts (2) 29; 213-220.
GRANDJEAN, F, 39584. Observations sur Jes Palaeucdroides
(5 séric). Bull, Mus, nam. Hist. har. Paris (2) 30 76-483,
GRANDIBAN, F. 1958) Ab sujet du nase et de son oeil infére
chee les Oribales et les Endeostigmata (Acariens), Bull,
Mus. natn, Hist. nat, Paris (2) 30: 427-435,
GRANDJEAN, F, 1965, Nouvelles observations sur les Oribates
(4° série), Acarologia 7 91-112,
GRANDIEAN, F. 1967. Nouvelles observations sur Jes Oribares
(5° série), Acarologia 9> 242-272-
GRANDIEAN, F. 1969. Considéraijuns sur le classement des
Oribates. Leur division en 6 groupes majeurs, Acarologiu 11;
127-153.
HAMMEN, L. van der 1959. Berlese’s primitive Oribarid mites.
Zodal, Verh., Leiden 40: 1-93.
HAMMEN, L.. van der 1963. The Orjbatid family Pithivacaridae.
f [ntroduetion and redescription of Hoplophthirarurns
pavidus Berlese. Acarologia 5: 306-317,
HAMMER, M, (967, Investigations of the Oribatid fauna of New
Zealand, part 1, Biol. Skr. 18 (4): 1-64. 40 pls.
HAMMER, M. 1972. Investigations on the Oribatid fauna of
Tahiti, and on some oribatids [ound on ihe atoll Rangiroa,
Biol, Skr. 19 (3); 1-92, 26 pls.
HAMMER, M, 1973. Grihands from Tongatapu and Ena, the
Tonga islands, and from Upolu, Western Samoa. Biol. Skr.
20 (3): 1-71, 29 pls.
HIRSCHMANN. W, 1957. Gangsystemalik Jer Parasitiformes, |
Teil [. Rumpfhehaarung und Ruckenflachen. Acarologie,
SchrReihe vergl Milbenk,, Firth 1; 1-20, i-v. 26 pls
HUGHES, T. E. 1959. Mites ar the Acari. University af London:
225 pp.
JACOT, A P. 1930, Oribatid mires of the 4ublamily
Phthiracarinae of the Northeastern United States. Proce.
Boston Soc nat. Hist, 39: 209-261, 10 pls.
JACOT, AP. 1933. Phthiracarid mites of Florida, J. Elisha
Mitchell scienr. Soe, 482 232-267.
JACOT, A. P. 1938. More box-mites of the Northeastern Linited
States. JI. N.Y. ent. Spe, 46: 109-145,
KOCH, C. L, 1841, 'Deutschlands Crustaceen, Myriapoden und
Arachiden”’ pol, 32 (15), Regensburg (not seen).
KRANTZ, G. W. 1978. A manual of Acarology.” Oregon State
University: S098 pp.
KRIVOLUTSKY, DBD, 1965. New species of armoured mites
(Acsriformes, Oribatei) fram the taiga zone of the USSR,
Ent, Obosr, 44: 705-708 (in Russian. nor seen).
LANGE, A. B. 1954, The morphology of Zachvatkinella bel-
biformes gen, and sp.n.—an interesting species of
Palacacunformes (Acariformes) Zoal. Zh. 33s 1042-L052-(in
Russian)
LANGE, A. B. 1972.. New species of palacacarid mites
(Pulaeucaridae), West, mosk, gas. Liniv (Biol_)4; 103-106 (in
Rugsiaa, nor seen).
LANGE, A. B 1974. Gilarovella demetrii Lange, gen, noy. and
Sp. fovV—a new representative of palaeacaroid mites
(Pajaeacaroidea, Ctenacaridae) from Turkmenia, Vesi.
mosk, gos. Uniu., N.S. 1s 18-20 (in Russian, aat seen).
LANGE, A, B. 1975, Sarcoptilormes. Palaeacaroidea: 4i-
47—In: M. 8, Ghilarov. ed_, Identification Key to the seil-
dwelling mites, Academy of Sciences, USSR, Moscaw: 391
pp (in Russian).
222
LEE, D. C. 1970. The Rhodacaridae (Acari: Mesostigmata):
classification, external morphology and distribution of
genera. Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 16; 1-219.
LEE, D. C. 1973. Rhodacaridae (Acari; Mesostigmata) from
near Adelaide, Australia. Il. Ecology. Trans. R. Soc. 8S.
Aust. 97: 139-152.
LINDQUIST, E. E, and EVANS, G. O. 1965. Taxonomic
concepts in the Ascidae, with a modified setal nomenclature
for the idiosoma of the Gamasina (Acarina: Mesostigmata).
Mem, ent. Soc. Can. 47: 1-64.
LIONS, J. C. 1966. Contribution a l'étude du genre Rhysotritia
(Acarien, Oribate): Rhysorritia clavata sextianan. subsp. Vie
Milieu 17: 779-794.
MACFARLANE, D. and SHEALS, J. G. 1965. A new
phthiracarid mite from Israel. Acarologia 7: 577-583.
MAHUNKA, S. 1974. Neue und interssante milben aus dem
Genfer Museum. XI. Archs. Sci., Genéve 26: 205-225.
MAHUNKA, §S. 1977. Neue und interssante milben aus dem
Genfer Museum XXXI. A remarkable sample of archaic soil
mites from Kenya (Acari: Oribarida). Revue suisse Zool, 84:
463-479,
MARKEL, K. 1964. Die Euphthiracaridae Jacot 1930, und ihre
Gatturgen (Acari, Oribatei). Zool. Verh. Leiden 67:1-78.
MARKEL, K. and MEYER, L 1959. Zur Systematik der
deutschen Euphthiracarini. Zool. Anz. 163; 327-342.
MORITZ, M. 1974. Beitrige zur Kenntnis der Oribatiden
(Acari) Europas VI. Neoctenacarus hastilis nov. gen., nov.
spec., eine neue Ctenacaride aus der DDR (Palaeosomata,
Ctenacaroidea). Abh. Ber. NaturkMus.-ForschStelle, Gérlitz
48: IV/i—1V/14.
NEWELL, I. M. 1956. The new genus Tetracondyla in the Pacific
(Acari: Oppiidae). Proc. Hawaii ent. Soc, 16: 113-121.
NEWELL, 1,.M. 1957. A new genus and species of Oribatei
(Acari) exhibiting external sexual dimorphism. Proc. Hawaii
ent. Soc. 16: 298-306.
PEREZ-INIGO C,, 1969. Nuevos oribaétidos de seulos espanoles
(Acari, Oribatei). Eos, Wien 44: 377-402.
PERTY, M. 1841. ‘‘Allgemein Naturgeschichte, als Philosopische
und Humanitatswissenschaft fur Naturforscher, Philosophen
und das héher gebildete Publikum’ 3, Bern (not seen),
RAMSAY, G, W. 1966, Three new box-mites (Acari: Oribatei:
Phthiracaroidea) from the Brothers, Cook Strait, New
Zealand. N.Z. JI Sci. 9: 901-912.
REC. §. AUST. MUS 18 (9); 199-122
January, [981
SCHWEIZER, J, 1956. Die Landmilben des Schwiezerischen
National-parkes. 3. Teil: Sarcoptiformes Reuter 1909,
Ergebn. wiss. Unters schweiz. NatnParks, N,F, $+ 215-377.
SELLNICK, M, 1944. Zercon C. L.. Koch Acari, Bl. Milbenk, 5:
30-41,
SHEALS, J. G. 1965. Primitive Cryptostigmatid mites from
rhodendron forests in the Nepal Himalaya. Bull, Br. Mus.
nat. Hist. (Zool.) 13: 1-35.
SHEALS, J. G. 1969. Computers in Acarine Taxonomy.
Acarologia 11: 376-396.
SOUTHCOTT, R. V, 1961. Studies on the systematics and
biology of the Erythraeoidea (Acarina), with a critical
revision of the genera and subfamilies, Aust. J, Zool. 9: 367-
610,
SPAIN, A, V., and LUXTON, M. 1971. Catalog and
bibliography of the Acari of the New Zealand Subregion,
Pacif. Insects Monogr, 25: 179-226.
SPECHT, R. L. 1972. ‘‘The vegetation of South Australia’’.
Government Printer, Adelaide: 328 pp.
TRAGARDH, I. 1906. Neue Acariden aus Natal und Zululand,
Zool. Anz, 30: 870-877.
TRAGARDH, |. 1932. Palaeacariformes, a new suborder of
Acari. Ark. Zool. 24B(2): 1-6.
TRAVE, J. 1964. Andacarus watsoni, n.sp, (Acarien, Oribate)
de Vile Macquarie, Pacif. Insects Monogr. 7 (Suppl.): 647-
652.
WALKER, N, A. 1965, Euphthiracaroidea of California Sequoia
Litter; with a reclassification of the families and genera of the
world (Acarina: Oribatei), Fort Hays Studies—Science, N.S.
3: 1-154.
WALLWORK, J. A. 1946. More oribatid mites (Acari:
Cryptostigmata) from Campbell I. Pacif, Ins. 8: 849-877.
WALLWORK, J, A. 1977. La faune terrestre de I'le de Sainte-
Héléne, 4. Acarina. 4,1 Cryptostigmata. Annis. Mus. r. Afr.
cent. 8° Sci. Zool. No, 220: 189-257,
WOOLLEY, T. A, 1971. Taxonomy of oribatid mites—retros-
pect and prospect. Int. Congr. Acarology: 3. Prague: 337-341.
ZACHVATKIN, A. A. 1945a. On the discovery of
Palaeacariformes (Acarina) in the U.S.S.R. Dokl. Akad.
Nauk. U.S.S.R. for Lang. Edn. 47; 673-676.
ZACHVATKIN, A. A, 1945b, On the morphology of
Beklemishevia galeodula n.g. and n.sp,—a new member of
the group Palaeacariformes (Acarina). Byull. mosk. Obshch.
Ispyt. Prir,, Biol. N.S. 50: 60-71 (in Russian),
RECORDS oF THE | O
SOUTH AUSTRALIAN Zan
MUSEUM oF
VOLUME 18 NUMBERS 10—13 SEPTEMBER 1981
No.
No.
No.
No.
10
11
12
13
EVOLUTIONARY SYSTEMATICS OF XEWYLLA XII. REDESCRIPTION
OF X OCCIDENTALIS WOMERSLEY AND A COMPARISON OF THE
CHAETOTAXY OF X ARENOSA UCHIDA AND TAMURA AND X
LITTORALIS WWOMERSLEY (INSECTA: COLLEMBOLA)
by MARIA MANUELA DA GAMA
A NEW SPECIES OF THE GENUS CATACANTHUS SPINOLA
(HETEROPTERA: PENTATOMIDAE: PENTATOMINAE) FROM THE
NEW HEBRIDES WITH MORPHOLOGICAL NOTES ON TWO OTHER
AUSTRALASIAN SPECIES AND THEIR RELATIONSHIPS
by IMTIAZ AHMAD and SYED KAMALUDDIN
THE FOSSIL PELICANS OF AUSTRALASIA
by PAT VICKERS RICH and G. F. VAN TETS
ON SOME OVIPAROUS FILARIAL NEMATODES MAINLY FROM
AUSTRALIAN BIRDS
by ODILE BAIN and PATRICIA M. MAWSON
SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM
North Terrace, Adelaide
South Australia 5000
EVOLUTIONARY SYSTEMATICS OF ZENYLLA. XU. REDESCRIPTION
OF X. OCCIDENTALIS WOMERSLEY AND A COMPARISON OF THE
CHAETOTAXY OF X. ARENOSA UCHIDA AND TAMURA AND X.
LITTORALIS WOMERSLEY (INSECTA: COLLEMBOLA)
BY MARIA MANUELA DE GAMA
Summary
X. occidentalis is redescribed from Womersley material; the chaetotaxy of X. arenosa is given
showing it to be distinct from X. littoralis. The phylogenetic position of these species is also
considered.
EVOLUTIONARY SYSTEMATICS OF XENYLLA. XII. REDESCRIPTION OF X. OCCIDENTALIS
WOMERSLEY AND A COMPARISON OF THE CHAETOTAXY OF X. ARENOSA UCHIDA AND
TAMURA AND X. LITTORALIS WOMERSLEY (INSECTA: COLLEMBOLA)
by
MARIA MANUELA DA GAMA
Museu e Laboratério Zoolégico, Departmento de Zoologia, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
ABSTRACT Redescription
GAMA, M.M. da. 1981. Evolutionary systematics of Xenylla. Body length: 0.56-0.74 mm Blue. Cutaneous
XII. Redescription of X. occidentalis Womersley and a granulation relatively coarse.
comparison of the chaetotaxy of X. arenosa Uchida and
Tamura and X. littoralis Womersley (Insecta: Collembola).
Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 18(10): 223-226. Dorsal chaetotaxy showing the following charac-
X. occidentalis is redescribed from Womersley _ ters.
material; the chaetotaxy of X. arenosa is given Head: all setae present; L, equal in length to L;.
showing it to be distinct from X. littoralis. The Th.II-III: all setae present and central ones
phylogenetic position of these species is also arranged in five rows (characters h,, h)).
considered. There are 2 S.s. on each side, one in
position P,.
OBSERVATIONS AND DISCUSSION Abd. I-III: S.s. = P,; ps absent.
Abd.IV: S.s. = Ps.
Xenylla occidentalis Womersley, 1934 Abd SE. SPs: 9. present
Fig. 1
Pare Ventral chaetotaxy presenting the following features
Material examined Head: all setae present.
Western Australia: Red Hill, Kalamunda, on Th.II-III: without setae (character t).
fungus, D.C.S., 30.V.1931, 6 specimens identified Abd.II: p; and p, absent (character v).
by Womersley. Abd. III: without medial setae nor median seta.
Aa wwywwvnu
ed ww vun
A
ar
~
vA
weve
e uvuvy Mouse
aoe
MuUUC LUNN
rnaAA
RnRaARD NAKA
6 b
Fig. 1—Xenylla occidentalis. a—Mucrodens in profile; b—Mucro-
dens, postero-dorsal view.
September, 1981
224 REC. 8. AUST. MUS. 18(10): 223-226
Abd.IV: the following setae absent—m,
(character a,), m. (character a,) and m,
(character a,).
Antenna IV with four cylindrical sensillae, of
which three are in outer dorsal position and
one is in the inner dorsal position,
§ + 5 eyes.
Unguis without inner tooth, Tibiotarsus with
two dorsal and two ventral long, clavate
ténent hairs, Tenaculum with 3 + 3 barbs.
Mucro spoon-shaped (Fig. 1), about 1/4-1/5
of length of dens, separated from it, which
has two setae. The mucro is about half as
long as Unguis HT. Anal spines not able to
be observed,
Systematics and evolution
The chactotaxic characters (hy, ho, t, V, ay, as, a4)
mentioned in the redescription place this species in
the position indicated in the phylogenetic tree
(Guma and Greenslade 1981).
Xenylla arenosa Uchida and Tamura, 1967
(Fig. 2)
Material examined of X, littoralis (see Gama 1980a)
South Australia: Yorke Peninsula, Jolly’s Beach,
7 specimens (identified by Gama), Yorke Peninsula,
Royston Head, 8 specimens (identified by Gama);
Christies Beach, 4 specimens (identified by Womers-
ley); Marino Rocks, 2 specimens (identified by
Womersley).
Western Australia: Rottnest Island, |
(identified by Womersley),
cotype
Japan, Cape Tachimachi, 9 specimens (identified
by Gama).
Material examined of X. arenosa: Japan, Akkeshi, 3
paratypes, leg, H. Tamura, 28.VI.1965.
Systematics and evolution
XX. arenosa belongs to the most primitive group of
species (welchi, malayana, portoricensis, bellingeri,
subbellingeri, thibaudi and littoralis) in which the
central setae on thoracic tergites II-III] are arranged
in three rows (absence of characters h,hz)—see
phylogenetic trees in Gama 1980b and Gama and
Greenslade 1981, As well, these species have no
setae on thoracic sternites II-III (character t).
September, 198]
Dorsal chaetotaxy (Fig. 2): there are supernumer-
ary setae, not represented in Figure 2, on the
thoracic and abdominal tergites, principally on th.[,
lateral parts of th.TI-ITT and abd. [-TV, and one can
observe a differentiation into macrochactae and
microchaetac.
Head; p, absent (character b); L; equal in
length to L;; Ly as long as L; and L,
(unusual in the genus XNenylla).
Th. H-UT: central setae arranged in three rows,
m, absent (character k); there are 2 §,s, on
cach side, one of which is in position Py.
Abd, lll: S.s. = P.3 ps present,
Abd. IV: S.s. = Ps; m, absent (character 0); a,
present,
Abd. V: S.s. P,; a, present.
Ventral chaetotaxy:
Head: p, and m, absent (character rc, s).
Th. T-Ill: without setae (character t).
Abd, [f; all setae present.
Abd. [[l: without medial setae nor median seta.
Abd. IV: all setae appear to be present though
difficult to distinguish,
Il
Comparison of the chaetotaxy of X. arenosa with that
of X. littoralis
A study of the descriptions of these two
halophilous species, the former known from Japan
and the latter from Australia and Japan (Gama
1980a, p. 123) might lead one to think that they are
one und the same, For a brief comparison of the
adaptive characters between X, arenosa and X,
littoralis (see Gama 1980a, p. 123-125),
However, an examination of their chaetotaxy
indicates that they are distinct species separated by
the following nonadaptative characters (Fig. 2, this
paper, and Fig. 1, in Gama 1980a).
Dorsal chaetotaxy: on the head p, is absent in X.
arenosa (character b) and present in X. littoralis; in
this latter species L, is longer than L, (character f),
whereas in the former these two setae are equal in
length. On the th. U-fIf m, is absent in X. arenosa
(character k), and present in X, littoralis. On the
abd. | V m, is absent in X. arenosa (character o) and
present in X. littoralis in which p, is absent
(character n), whereas in X. arenosa p, is present.
Ventral chactotaxy: on the head p,; and m, are
absent in X. arenosa (characters r, s) and present in
X. littoralis, On the abd, TJ all the setae are present
in X, arenosa, while in X. littoralis p, and p; are
absent (character v) and p, also (character w).
Nm
No
nn
EVOLUTIONARY SYSTEMATICS OF XENYLLA
vee
Muu
PAOARR ANA Rm ARAnA
+
ee
a . \, Se va ee
e
-
— “
~~ ro tial
Veuve eer ina
io
ve
ee
ve
-
= naan
BR RAR AAAI NAA ARs nnn, We
accct AAR ARaA
aan
Aw
=)
PB
ye
fi
ZA
~
_A
_A
A
4
5
&
Ly ~
ererererereren ee eee ~
‘gee ewer Views
wes|eer er eeeewe eee renelereererererererenererenes enemas porenereeReerereneserenerenereteses >
7
?
?
?
a ?
u 2
2
?
)
d
a
By
pacer -
nc
cy
y
u
v
i y)
Ye / ‘\ ‘
. -
RL oe
Fig. 2—Xenylla arenosa. Dorsal chaetotaxy of head, th. I-II and
abd. I, IV-VI.
226 REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18(10): 223-226
REFERENCES
GAMA, M.M. da, 1969. Notes taxonomiques et lignées
généologiques de quarante deux espéces et sous-espéces du
genre Xenylla. WI. Mems Estud. Mus. zool. Univ. Coimbra
308: 1-61.
GAMA, M.M. da, 1980a. Evolutionary systematics of Xenylla.
XI. Species from the Australian region. Rec. S. Aust. Mus.
18 (5): 123-129.
GAMA. M.M. da, 1980b. Apergu évolutif d’une septantaine
d’espéces et sous-espéces de Xenylla provenant de tous les
continents. Proc. 1° Intern. Semin. Apteryg. Siena 1978: 53-58
September, 1981
GAMA, M.M. da, and GREENSLADE, P., 1981. Relationships
between the distribution and phylogeny of Xenylla
(Collembola, Hypogastruridae) species in Australia and New
Zealand. Revue Ecol. Biol. Sol (in press).
UCHIDA, H., and Tamura, H.,
Collembolen-Art von Hokkaido. J. Fac. Sci.
Univ. S. VI., Zoology, 16 (2): 234-237.
WOMERSLEY, H., 1933. A preliminary account of the
Collembola-Arthropleona of Australia, I Poduroidea. Trans.
R.Soc. S. Aust. 57: 48-71.
WOMERSLEY, H., 1939. Primitive Insects of South Australia.
Silverfish, springtails and their allies. 322 pp. Adelaide,
Govt. Printer.
1967. Eine neue litorale
Hokkaido
A NEW SPECIES OF THE GENUS CATACANTHUS SPINOLA
(HETEROPTERA: PENTATOMIDAE: PENTATOMINAE)
FROM THE NEW HEBRIDES WITH MORPHOLOGICAL NOTES ON
TWO OTHER AUSTRALASIAN SPECIES AND THEIR RELATIONSHIPS
BY IMTIAZ AHMAD AND SYED KAMALUDDIN
Summary
Catacanthus grossi Ahmad & Kamaluddin, n.sp. of the tribe Catacanthini Stal from the New
Hebrides is described and its metathoracic scent gland ostioles and genitalia examined and figured.
Morphological notes on two other Australasian species, C. carrenoi (Le Guillou) and C. punctus
(Fabr.), are given and the three species above are compared with C. incarnatus (Drury) from the
Oriental region and the relationships of the four species are briefly discussed.
A NEW SPECIES OF THE GENUS CATACANTHUS SPINOLA (HETEROPTERA: PENTATOMIDAE;
PENTATOMINAE) FROM THE NEW HEBRIDES WITH MORPHOLOGICAL NOTES ON TWO OTHER
AUSTRALASIAN SPECIES AND THEIR RELATIONSHIPS’
by
IMTIAZ AHMAD and SYED KAMALUDDIN?
Department of Zoology, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan
ABSTRACT
AHMAD, L., and KAMALUDDIN, S, 1981, A new species of
the genus Catacanthus Spinola (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae,
Pentalominae) from the New Hebrides with morphological notes
on two other Australasian species and (heir relationships, Rec. S.
Aust, Mus, 18 (11); 227-233.
Catacanthus grosst Ahmad & Kamaluddin, nsp,
of the tribe Catacanthini Stal from the New
Hebrides is described and its metathoracic scent
gland ostioles and genitalia examined and figured.
Morphological notes on two other Australasian
species, C. carrenoi (Le Guillow) and C, punctus
(Fabr.), are given and the three species above are
compared with C. incarnarus (Drury) from the
Oriental region and the relationships of the four
species are briefly discussed.
INTRODUCTION
Gross (1976) placed the genus Catacanthus
Spinola in his general section of Pentatominue allied
to his Menida, Piezodorus, Pentatoma & Rhyn-
chocoris groups for want of sufficient male
specimens. Ahmad and Afzal (1978) studied the
external morphology, including the metathoracic
scent gland ostioles, and the male and female
genitalia and also the internal anatomy including the
digestive, male and female reproductive organs and
the scent and salivary apparati of C. incarnatus
(Drury) and proposed the resurrection of Catacan-
thint Stal within the subfamily Pentatominae Amyot
et Serville,
Recently by the courtesy of Dr G. F. Gross,
Principal Curator of South Australian Museum, the
authors were given the opportunity to examine a
unique male specimen of Catacanthus from the New
Hebrides which differs [rom all other species in
being a uniformly dark purplish-brown with the
venter and all femora yellow in contrast to the
generally patterned body of brilliant, shining colours
in other species. It is described here as C. grossi
n.sp., and the structure of its merathoracic scent
gland ostioles and genitalia have been investigated.
‘Financially supported by PARC-LISDA Research Project
A17-ENT-37 (EG-Pa-181),
“Research Officer ‘STUDIES ON THE RICE {[NSECTS OF
PAKISTAN WITH REFERENCE TO THEIR SYSTEMATICS
AND PHEROMONE GLANDS’ FG-Pa-310 (PK-ARS-139).
Male and female specimens of two other species,
C. punctus (Fabricius)—also by the courtesy of Dr
Gross—and C, carrenoi (Le Guillow) by the courtesy
of Dr W. J. Knight and Mr W. R. Dolling of the
British Museum (Natural History), London, were
examined with special reference to the above
characters, for there has been a general belief that
the two species may be synonymous (Grass,
personal communication), Diagrams of the male and
female genitalia of C. incarnatus (Drury) are also
given for comparison and for further clarification of
the structures and the relationships of the included
taxa are briefly discussed in this hght. For
dissections, drawings and measurements the conven-
tional procedures, especially those used by the
present authors (1976), were generally followed.
Catacanthus carrenoi (Le Guill.)
(Figs. 1-4, 12-18, 29, 31)
Raphigaster carrenot Le Guillow, 1841, p, 262,
Pentatoma tricalor Montrouziet, 1855, p. 96.
Catacanthus carrenoi, Stal. 1876, p, 89.
Coloration: Body pale, reddish except head
(excluding brownish-black eyes), pinkish ocelli,
pronotum with anterior and anteriolateal margins
including callosities and a wide posteriomedial
portion, scutellum with basal wide portion, each
corium with a Jarge transverse spot on middle
portion, clavus, legs, antennae and labium black,
connexiva reddish, membrane of hemelytra light
brown.
Head: Slightly broader than long; anteocular
region slightly shorter than postenor portion of head
including eyes; antennae with 3rd segments longer
than 2nd and equal ta 2/1 x basal, length of
segments, 1 1.2 mm (1.2-1.5 mm), 2 3.0 mm (3,0-
3.2mm), 3 3.3mm (3.1-3.3mm), 4 4.5mm, 5
4.) mm, antennal formula 1<2<3<4; labium
passing mesocoxae, basal segments shorter than
bucculae, 3rd segment longest and distinctly more
than L'/: x basal, length of segments 1 1,3 mm (1,3-
1.5 mm), 2 2.0 mm (t.9-2.2 mm), 3 2.35 mm (2.0-
2.4 mm), 4 1.75 mm (1.5-1.8 mm}, labial formula
1<4<2<3; length anteocular region 1-5 mm (1,5-
1.6 mm); length posterior of head including eyes
228
1.6mm (1.6-1.75 mm), width 3.15 mm (3.15-
3.9mm); interocellar distance 1.7mm _ (1.7-
1.8 mm); interocellar distance 1.0mm _ (0.9-
1,1 mm).
FIG, 1, Catacanthus carrenoi Le Guillou in dorsal view.
Thorax and Abdomen: Pronotum with humeral
angles rounded, length of pronotum 4.4 mm (3.8-
5.2 mm), width 10.4 mm (9.4-12.0 mm); scutellum
with apical lobe narrowed, apex acute, length of
scutellum 8.5 mm (8,2-10.0 mm), width 6.5 mm
(6.0-7.4 mm); mesosternum slightly raised and
rugulose; metathoracic scent gland ostioles (Fig. 2)
small, somewhat ovate, peritremes elongated
tapering anteriolateral, apically somewhat acute,
evaporating area distinct; distance base scutellum-
apex clavus 6.6 mm (6.2-7.6 mm); apex clavus-apex
corium 4.3 mm (3.5-4.8 mm); apex corium-apex
membrane 5.8 mm (5.2-6.1 mm); apex scutellum-
apex membrane including abdomen 8.1 mm (7.2-
9.0 mm); abdomen with basal abdominal spine only
reaching hind coxae; connexiva distinctly exposed in
repose; in 2 posterior margin of 7th abdominal
sternum medially shallowly folded in, laterally
almost straight. Total length ¢ 24.1 mm (22.3-
24.1 mm), 27.55 mm.
Male genitalia: Pygophore (Figs. 3 and 4) with
dorsomedian surface deeply concave, three spinelike
processes at inner side of posterior lateral margins,
ventroposterior margin folded in medially, laterally
distinctly sinuated, ventrolateral lobe with two
spinelike fused processes, directed inward; para-
meres (Fig. 12) F-shaped, inner process short, outer
REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18(11): 227-233
September, 1981
and inner margins entire, sinuated, apex much
narrowed, acute; theca (Figs. 13-15) with an
unpaired dorsal blunt thumb-like large median
thecal appendage, a pair of dorsal thecal appendages
with lateral, horn-like, semisclerotized lobes, a pair
of ventral thecal appendages proximally semi-
sclerotized and distally sclerotized and denticulated,
and a bilobed dorsal membranous conjunctival
appendages with distal portion sclerotized and
outwardly sinuated, vesica short, penial lobes ovate
medially and outwardly fused with conjunctiva.
Female genitalia: (Fig. 29) 8th paratergites fused,
medially almost straight, sub-equal to 1st
gonocoxae, latter with posterior margin sinuated,
9th paratergites lobelike, elongated, outer margin
medially concave, slightly passing beyond posterior
margins of fused 8th paratergites, proctiger post-
eriorly substraight, 2nd gonocoxae broad; sper-
matheca (Fig. 31) with pump region medially faintly
constricted, bulb with two equal elongated,
fingerlike processes.
Material examined: 2 36, 1 9%, N. Borneo,
Philippines and New Guinea: 1911; June 1936 leg
Distant, W. L. Cheesman, L. E., in British Museum
(Natural History).
Comparative Note: This species is most closely
related to punctus (Fabr.) in general appearance but
it can easily be separated in having the distal portion
of the anterior tibiae dilated, the distal scutellar
black patch distally rounded, the ostiolar peritreme
much narrower and other characters as noted in the
morphological description.
Catacanthus grossi n.sp.
(Figs. 5-7, 11, 16-19)
Coloration: Body coffee-coloured tinged with
purple, green and black, except eyes brownish;
punctate; ocelli reddish; legs excluding femora,
antennae and labium black with greenish tinge,
venter and connexiva pale except small portions at
connexival joints black, membrane of hemelytra
with distal half coffee coloured, proximal half
transparent.
Head: Distinctly more than 25% broader than
long; anteocular region distinctly shorter than
posterior portion of head including eyes; antennae
with 3rd segment distinctly longer than 2nd and
slightly longer than 2x the basal, length of segments,
1 1.15 mm, 2 2.8mm, 3 3.25 mm, 4-5 mutilated;
labium reaching hind coxae with basal segments
shorter than bucculae, 3rd segment distinctly more
than 1'hx basal, length of segments 1 1.4 mm, 2
19mm, 3 2.3mm, 4 1.7mm, labial formula
1<4<2<3; length anteocular region 1.3 mm; length
A NEW SPECIES OF THE GENUS CATACANTHUS SPINGLA pat!)
FIGS. 2-10
2-4—Catacanthus
carrenor Le Guillou,
2—melathoracie scent gland ostiole. evp. (evaporaturia).
(ostiole), per, (peritreme ): 3—pygopliore in dorsil view. pre
(prochiger), 1th abd. seg. (eleventh ahdominal segment),
ms. (dorsamedian surtace), ll, (uteral lobe); +— pvgophore
in Venrral view. 5-7—Catacanthus gross} nosp.
S—meltathoracie scent gland ostiole. 6 pygophore in. dorsal
view, 7—pyacphore in ventral view. 8-1-—Caracanthus
punctis (Pabr), Bemetithoracic scent gland ostoele;
9—pygophore in dorsal view; 10—pyguphore in ventral view.
posterior portion of head including eyes 1.6 mm,
width 3.8mm; interocular distance 1.7 mm;
jnteracellar distance 0.8 mm.
Thorax and Abdomen: Pronotum with humeral
angles subacute, length of pronotum 4.4 mm, width
10.7 mm; scutellum with apical lobe broad, apex
subacute, length of scutellum 9.0 mm, width
6.8 mm; mesosternum slightly carinated and rugul-
ase, metathoracic scent gland ostioles (Fig, 5) small,
ovate, peritremes much elongated, medially curved,
tapering anteriad, apically acute, evaporating area
distinct; distance base scutellum-apex clavus
7.4mm; apex clavus-apex corium 4.5 mm; apex
corium-apex membrane $5.5 mm; apex scutellum-
apex membrane including abdomen & 8 mm; abdo-
men with basal abdominal spine only reaching
mesocoxae; connexiva slightly exposed at repose;
fernale not available. Total length ¢ 25.10 mm,
Male genitalia: Pygophore (Figs. 6 and 7) with
dorsomedian surface shallowly concave, one bifur-
cated, short, spinelike process at inner sides of
posterolateral margins, ventroposterior miurgin
pushed in medially, latter raised into bilobed
processes following laterally into beaklike struc-
tures; parameres (Fig. 16) L-shaped, blade with one
short inner process and one dorsolateral out growth,
outer margin sinuated, inner margin of anterior half
of blade irregular; theca (Figs. 17-19) with an
unpaired, dorsal, blunt, thumblike, small median
theeal appendage, a pair of dorsal thecal appendages
with lateral hornlike semisclerotized lobes, a pair of
ventral thecal, proximally semisclerouzed and
distally sclerotized with larger teeth, a bilobed dorsal
membranous conjunctival appendages, distally
sclerotized and sinuated, vesica short, penial lobes
platelike inner margin straight outer margin
sinuated, medially and outwardly fused with
conjunctiva,
23u REC. §. AUST. MUS. 14(11)- 227-233
1
40mm.
FIG. Il. Cotacanthus: grossi rsp. in dorsal view.
Material examined: Holotype 3, at light, vicinity
of Anelgahaut, Aneityum L., New Hebrides, July 21,
1971 leg. G. F. Gross, Royal Society-Percy Sladen
Trust Expedition (in the South Austrahan Museum),
Comparative Notes: This new species appears
isolated in the entire genus and can be easily
separated from the other species in having the
chocolate body colour dorsally, elongated medially
curved swordlike peritremes and the other charac-
ters as listed in the description.
Catacanthus. punctus (Fabr,}
(Figs. 8-10, 24-28, 30, 32)
Cimex nigripes Sulzer, 1776, PI. 10 £9 (nee
Fubricius)
C. punctum Fabricius, 1787, p. 291.
Edessa punctum Fabricius, 1803, p, 149,
Coloration; Body orange, tinged red except head
(excluding brownish hlaek eyes), ocelli reddish,
pronotum with anterior and anteriolateral margins
including callosities and a wide posteriomedial
pertion, scutellum with basal wide portions, each
corium with a large transverse spot on posterior 2/3,
clavus with basal portions, legs, antennae and
September, 1981
labium black with greenish tinge, connexiva reddish,
membrane of hemelytra ight brown.
Head; Less than 1/2 again broader than long:
anteocular region distinctly shorter than posteriar
portion of head including cyes; antennae with 3rd
segments slightly longer than 2nd and distinctly
more than 2'4x basal, Jength of segments 1 1.3 mm
(1.3-1.4 mm), 2 3.0 mm (3.0-3.1 mm), 33.25 mm, 4
and 5 mutilated; Jabium and bueculae as in carreneai,
3rd segment about 1'® basal, length of segments |
1.5mm (1.5-1,6 mm), 2 1.9 mm (1.9-2.2 mm), 3
2.2 mm (2.2-2.5 mm), 4 1-7 mm, labial formula
1<4<2<3; length anteocular region t.4 mm (1.4-
1.4 mm); length posterior portion of head including
eyes 1.7mm (1.7-1.8 mm); width 3.6mm (3.6-
3.9 mm), interacular distance 1.7 mm (1.7-1.9 mm);
interocellar distance 1.0 mm (1.0-1.1 mim),
Thorax and Abdomen: Pronotum with humeral
angles rounded length of Pronotum 4.6 mm (4.6-
5.2 mm), width 11.0 mm (11.0-12,.8 mm), scutellam
with apical lobe narrowed, length of scutellum
9.1 mim (9.1-10.9 mm}, width 6.8 mm (6,8-9.0 mm);
mesosternum slightly sulcated and rugulose;
metathoracic scent gland ostioles (Fig. 8) compara-
tively large, slitlike, peritremes elongated tapering
lateral, apically sharp, acute, evaporative area
distinct; distance base scutellum-apex clavus 6.9 mm
(6.9-7.8 mm): apex eclavus-apex coriuny 4.3 mm (4,3-
5.2 mm); apex corium-apex membrane 6.0 mm (6.0-
6,5 mm); apex scutellum-apex membrane including
abdomen 8.0 mm (8.0-9.0 mm); abdomen with basal
abdominal spine passing mesocoxde; connexiva
distinctly exposed at repose; in 2 posterior margin
of 7th abdaminal sternum medially deeply folded in,
Jaterally concave. Toral Jength dd 24.8 mm,
2 28.5 mm,
Male genitalia: Pygophore: (Figs. 9 and 10) with
dorsomedian surface ecancave, three spinelike
processes at inner sidé of posteriolateral margins,
ventroposterior margin inpushed medially, latter
slightly convex, ventrolateral lobe with two spine-
Jike fused processes, directed inward; parameres
(Fig. 24) F-shaped, stem with inner process large,
outer and innet margins entire, sinuated, apex
narrowed, suhacute; theca (Figs. 25-27) with an
unpaired, dorsal, blunt, thumblike, compacatively
large median thecal appendage, a pair of darsal
thecal appendages with lateral comparatively small
horntike semisclerotized lobes, a pair of ventral
theeal proximally semisclerotized and distally
sclerotized and camparatively less denticulated and
a bilobed dorsal membranous conjunctival appen-
dages, distal portion sclerotized and concave; yesica
Short, penial lobes ovate medially and outwardly
fused with conjunctiva.
A NEW SPECIES OF THE GENUS CATACANTHUS SPINOLA 231
yosildth.app
Noxtoee — UME app.
AAD
15—
FIGS. 12-19, 12-15—Catacanthus carrenoi Le Guillou, 12—para-
mere in inner view, bl. (blade), st. (stem); 12—uninflated
theca in dorsal view; 14—inflated theca in dorsal view, ap.
(apodeme), bp. (basal plate), dmc, app, (dorsal membranous
conjunctival appendage), inf. p. (inflatory pump), slldth.
app. (semisclerotized lateral lobe of dorsal thecal appen-
dage), piv. (pivot), stt. (sclerotized tip), th. (theca);
1S—inflated theca in ventral view, gp. (gonopore), pl.
(penial lobe), splvth. app, (semisclerotized proximal lobe of
ventral thecal appendage); 16-19—Catacanthus grossi n.sp.,
16—paramere in inner view; 17—uninflated theca in dorsal
view; 18—inflated theca in dorsal view; 19—inflated theca in
ventral view.
Female genitalia: (Fig. 31) 8th paratergites fused,
medially slightly concave, longer than Ist
gonocoxae, latter with posterior margin convex, 9th
paratergites lobelike, elongated outer margin
sinuated, shorter than posterior margin of fused 8th
paratergites, proctiger posteriorly concave, 2nd
gonocoxae comparatively narrowed; spermatheca
(Fig. 32) with pump region medially swollen, bulb
with two unequal elongated fingerlike processes.
Material examined: 23, 12, Australian but
unlocalised (in the South Australian Museum).
Comparative Note: This species is most closely
related to C. carrenoi as noted above but it can
readily be separated in having a smaller body size,
the black patch on posterior of pronotum more
elongated and a narrowed distal half of the
peritremes beside other characters as noted under
‘Relationships’.
RELATIONSHIPS OF THE INCLUDED TAXA
Distant (1902, p. 218), although treating Catacan-
thus in his division Nezaria, indicated that further
studies might necessitate its separate treatment.
FIGS, 20-27, 20-23—Catacanthus incarnatus (Drury), 20—para-
mere in inner view; 21—uninflated theca in dorsal view;
22—uninflated theca in dorsal view; 23—inflated theca in
ventral view. 24-27—Catacanthus punctus (Fabr.); 24—para-
mere in inner view; 25—uninflated theca in dorsal view:
26—inflated theca in dorsal view; 27—inflated theca in
ventral view.
FIG. 28. Catacanthus punctus (Fabr.) in dorsal view.
pL fl REC. S AUST. MUS. 18(11): 227-233
——~—are
oe —tst.gox-
\ -— — Send gon
—— — fC.
September, 1941
—.—— =Pr« spd.
FIGS. 20.32. 29—Curacarthus carretoi Le Guillou—femiale
terminalia ip veutral view, Ist. gox (first gonocoxa), 2nd
gox, (secund gonocoxa), 8th pt, Ceigh| paratergite), 91h pr.
(ninth pardtergite). ape, (arcus), pre, (proctiger);
30—Culacanthus puncius (Fabr-)—temale terminalia in
ventral View, 31—Catacanthus carrenci Le Guillou—sper-
mathees, dis f (distal flange). dis spd. (distal spermathecal
duct), md, (median dilation), prsp.d. (process of sper
mathecal bulb), prox. f. (proximal (ange), prox, sp.d.
(proximal spermethecal duct), sel.nyd. (sclerotized median
duet), sp.b. (Spermiatheval bulb). sp.p. (spermathecal pump);
32—Catacanthus purens (Fabr.j--spermuatheci.
Ahmad
and Afzal (1978) in) their external
morphological and internal anatomical studies on
C. incarnatus (Drury) have clearly demonstrated the
distinctness of this genus within the subfamily
Pentatominae Amyot et Serville and on that basis
have resurrected the tribe Catacanthini Stdl to
accommodate the genus.
The present Australasian species C. carrenoi,
C. grossi and C. punctus are clearly related to the
type-Species C. incarnatus from the Oriental region
in their large size (24.8-28,.5 mm), reflexed Jateral
margins of head and pronotum, more prominent
clypeus than paraclypei, clongated daggershaped
ostidlar peritreme, in male pygophore having
dorsolateral inner processes, parameres with more
or less prominent inner knobs at the base of the
blade (not clearly shown by Ahmad and Afzal 1978),
theca with a single dorsomedian, a pair of dorsal
thecal appendages (with dorsolateral semisclerotized
lobes) and a pair of ventral thecal appendages with
ventrolateral sermisclerotized lobes, a bilobed dorsal
membranous conjunctival appendage with
sclerotized tips and penial lobes fused medially and
with conjunctiva and in the females with widely
exposed arcus and second gonocoxae and sper-
matheca with a small spherical bulb having a pair of
uniformly thin, elongated and curved fingerlike
processes, The above characters alsa isolare
Catacanthus in the entire subfamily Pentatominae
and suppor! Ahmad and Afzal’s (1978) resurrection
of Stal’s tribe Catacanthini as separate from the
Pentatomini.
However it shares with other pentatomines the
characters of rounded unprojected humeral lobes,
moderately narrowed head with sinuated lateral
margins, scutellum with a distinct apical lobe,
ostiolar peritreme highly developed and base of
abdomen always with a spinous projection, Some of
the vharacters of male and female genitalia including
the inflated aedeagus with thecal appendages and
spherical spermathecal bulb usually bearing finger-
like processes also show the two groups to be closely
allied,
C, punctus and C, carrenoi appear more closely
felated to the type species C. incarnatus in having a
brilliantly coloured and patterned body, 4 more or
less straight ostiolar peritreme, in’ males the
pygophore has the dorsolateral inner processes more
or less trilobed, (second and third lobes ill developed
in C, incarnatus), parameres somewhat F-shaped
with a conical inner knob at the base of distally
tapering blade, and in other characters as listed
under the comparative and morphological notes of
C. carrenot and C, punetus.
C. carrenoi and ©. punctus however, appear more
closely related to each other in having a shining
A NEW SPECIES OF THE GENUS CATACANTHUS SPINOLA 233
black posteriomedian patch on pronotum and a
poximal patch on scutellum (Figs. 1 and 28), in male
more prominent inner knob of parameres and more
or less spinulose comparatively large ventral thecal
appendages in the inflated aedeagus (Figs. 15 and
27) and broadly rounded apices of 9th paratergites,
in the females (Figs. 29 and 30) in contrast to no
patch on pronotum and two shining black lateral
patches on proximal portion of scutellum, in males
less prominent and very short inner knob of
parameres, and smooth comparatively smaller
ventral thecal appendages in the inflated aedeagus
(Fig. 4, labelled dorsal by Ahmad and Afzal, 1978)
and narrowed tapering apices of 9th paratergites in
females (Fig. 13, Ahmad and Afzal, 1978) in
C. incarnatus, The two species have been suggested
to be possibly synonymous (Gross, personal
communication), However the comparatively much
larger spinules on the ventral thecal appendages and
the more or less equal processes of spermathecal
bulb in C. carrenoi together with the other characters
listed under the morphological and comparative
notes clearly separate it from C. punctus,
C. grossi appears on the other hand isolated in the
entire genus in having uniformly dark brown body
(Fig. 11) with venter and all femora yellow, anterior
margin of ostiolar peritreme medially curved (Fig.
5), in males dorsolateral inner processes of
pygophore short, bilobed, more or less L-shaped
parameres with a large irregular inner knob at the
base of more or less uniformly wide blade of
parameres and the theca with a less prominent and
short dorsomedian thecal appendage (Figs. 17 and
18).
REFERENCES
AHMAD, I. and AFZAL, M. 1978. Some aspects of the
morphology of Catacanthus incarnatus (Drury) (Pen-
tatomidae: Pentatominae) with phylogenetic considerations.
Pakistan J. Sci, Ind. Res. 21 (3-4); 129-135.
AHMAD, I. and KAMALUDDIN, S. 1976. A new genus and
three new species of Phyllocephelinae (Pentatomomorpha;
Pentatomidae) from Pakistan with notes on their zoogeo-
graphy and phylogeny. Ent. Mitr. Zool. Mus. Hamburg 5
(93): 81-95.
DISTANT, W. L. 1902, The fauna of British India including
Ceylon and Burma, Rhynchota 1 Taylor and Francis.
London.
FABRICIUS, J. C. 1787. ‘Mantissa Insectorum sistens eorum
species nuper Detectas adiectis characteribus, Genericis,
Differentiis specificis, Emendationibus, Observersationibus’.
Proft, Hafnia.
FABRICIUS, J. C, 1803. “Systema Rhyngotorum’, Reichard,
Brunswick,
GROSS, G. F. 1976. ‘Plant-feeding and other bugs (Hemiptera)
of South Australia, Heteroptera.’ Part Il. Government
Printer, South Australia.
LE GUILLOU, E, J. F. 1841, Description des Hemipteres
nouvedux, receuillis pendant son voyage de circumnavigation
sur la Corvette Zelée. Rev, Zool,; 260-263.
MONTROUZIER, P, 1855. Essai sur Ja faune de Vile de
Woodlark ou Moiou. Ann. Soc. Agr. Lyon 7 (2): 1-114.
STAL, C. 1876. Enumeratio Hemipterorum 5. K.
Vetensk. Akad. Handl. 14 (4): 1-162.
SULZER, J. H. 1776. ‘Abgekirzte Geschichte der Insecten nach
dem Linneischen System’. H. Steiner and Co,, Winterthur,
svenska
THE FOSSIL PELICANS OF AUSTRALASIA
BY PAT VICKERS RICH AND G. F.. VAN TETS
Summary
A review of all known Australasian fossil pelecanid material suggests that four species have
occurred in the southwest Pacific region during the past 20 million years. The oldest, Pelecanus
tirarensis, a small robust pelican from Miocene sediments of central Australia, has a distinctive
trochlear arrangement of the tarsometatarsus. The younger material is all Pleistocene in age, and
most of it can be referred to P. conspicillatus, the living Australian Pelican. An exception is P.
novaezealandiae, originally described as a large New Zealand subspecies of P. conspicillatus; it is
as different, however, from that species as is P. onocrotalus. P. cadimurka, n. sp., is distinctly
smaller, being within the size range of P. tirarensis, but with a differently shaped tarsometatarsus,
more closely resembling that of P. conspicillatus.
THE FOSSIL PELICANS OF AUSTRALASIA
by
PAT VICKERS RICH
Earth Sciences Department, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168 and National Museum of Victoria,
285-321 Russell Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000
and
G. F. VAN TETS
CSIRO, Division of Wildlife Research, P.O. Box 84, Lyneham, A.C.T. 2602
ABSTRACT
RICH, P. V., and van TETS, G. F. 1981. The fossil pelicans of
Australasia. Ree. S. Aust. Mus, 38 (12): 235-264.
A review of all known Australasian fossil
pelecanid material suggests that four species have
aceurred in the southwest Pacific region during the
past 20 million years. The oldest, Pelecanus
firarensis, a small robust pelican from Miocene
sediments of central Australia, has a distinctive
trochlear arrangement of the tarsometatarsus. The
younger material is all Pleistocene in age, and most
of it can be referred to P. conspicillatus, the living
Australian Pelican, An exception is P. novaezealan-
diae, originally described as a large New Zealand
subspecies of P. conspicillatus; it is as different,
hawever, [rom that species as is P. onocrotalus. P.
cadimurka, n, sp., is distinctly smaller, being within
the size cange of P. tirarensis, but with a differently
shaped tarsometatarsus, more closely resembling
that of P. conspicillarus.
INTRODUCTION
Pelicans, all in the genus Pelecanus, have a long
history in Australia, occurring as early as the
Miocene in terrestrial deposits of the Lake Eyre
Basin, South Australia. Their first occurrence
elsewhere in the world is contemporaneous with this
antipodean record.
Pelican fossils were first reported from Australia
by De Vis (1892) when he recognized Pelecanus
proavus from Quaternary sediments of south-eastern
Queensland. Later he set up an addifional two
species, P. validipes (in Brown, 1894) and
P, grandiceps (1905). No further pelecanid remains
were reported until Miller (1966) reviewed the De
Vis material and described a number of new
specimens collected during the 1950's on the Stirton
expeditions of the University of California and
South Australian Museum, Miller set up a new
species, P. tirarensis, based on a mid-Tertiary fossil
from the Lake Eyre Basin and reterred all of the De
Vis material except the lectotype of P. grandiceps
and the holotype of P. validipes to the living
Australian Pelican, P. conspicillatus. The same year
Scarlett (1966) designated pelican material found in
New Zealand as a new sub-species of the Australian
pelican, P.c. novaezealandiae (see Fig. 1).
Since the mid-1960's more pelican material has
been collected. This paper reports on all the fossil
pelican material from Australasia. Pelecanus tiraren-
sis is quite distinct from all other pelicans, both fossil
and Recent. Most of the Quaternary material,
however, appears to belong to P, conspicillatus, Two
forms, one small, P. cadimurkan, sp. and one large,
P. novaezealandiae from New Zealand, appear ta be
distinct species, The diagnoses of P, tirarensis and
P. cadimurka are based on features of their
tarsometatarsi and of P, novaezealandiae on
features of its synsacrum and femur. We found many
elements to be similar in size and shape in several
species of Pelecanus. The fossi] specimens that
lacked diagnostic features we have referred
therefore tentatively on the bases of size, location
and age to: P, tirarensis, small, central Australia,
Miocene; P. cadimurka n. sp., small, central
Australia, Quaternary; P: novaezealandiae, large
New Zealand, Holocene, and P. conspicillatus,
large, Australia, Quaternary, including the Recent
ABBREVIATIONS
The following abbreviations have been used in this
paper: AM, Australian Museum, Sydney; AMNH,
American Museum of Natural History, Ornithology
Department, New York; AWMM, Auckland War
Memorial Museum, Auckland; CM, Canterbury
Museum, Christchurch; ANWC, Australian
National Wildlife Collection. CSIRO Division of
Wildlife Research, Canberra; NMV, National
Museum of Victoria, Department of Ornithology,
Melbourne; QM, Queensland Museum, Brisbane,
SAM, South Australian Museum, Adelaide;
UCMP, University of California, Museum of
Paleontology, Berkeley; UCMVZ, University of
California, Museum of Vertebrate Zoology; 1.Z..
Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Beijing (Peking). > = greater than, + = slightly
yreater than, @ = approximately, rf = referred.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Thanks are due to many who aided us in this
study, especially our respective families for their
tolerance throughout this work. Several provided us
with fossil specimens and invaluable comparative
material including:
A, Bartholomai, W. Bock, Cheng Tso-hsin, J. W.
Gregory, P. L. Horn, N. Johnson, L. Kuster, W.
Lanyon, A. McEvey, P. Millener, S. Parker, N.
Pledge, D. E. Savage, R. J. Scarlett, A. Stokes, G.
Turbott, W. J. M. Vestjens, and M. Wade. M.
Canny, C. Armstrong, M. Heslop and R. Sheehan
typed the manuscript. G. Earl drafted the charts.
Frank Knight drew the map and mounted the
photographs which are by Frank Coffa. Thanks are
due to the M. A. Ingram Trust, Danks Trust, Utah
Mining, and the National Science Foundation (BMS
7200102) for support of various aspects of this study.
DIAGNOSIS OF ELEMENTS OF PELECANUS
REPRESENTED BY AUSTRALASIAN FOSSIL
MATERIAL
Fossil material discussed below was assigned to
the Pelecanidae because of the following combina-
tion of characters of these large birds:
Quadrate: Lacks distinct rounded pit for quad-
rato-jugal; entire ventral articular area with little
relief, lacking deep pitting between articular
surfaces for mandible and quadrato-jugal such as
that present in the Phalacrocoracidae; anterior
border of ventral articular surfaces nearly straight
lacking any marked process on ventral end that
projects medial to mandibular articulation; man-
dibular articulation parallel-sided over most of
medial half; squamosal articulation also of low
relief, oriented at 90° to ventral articular surface
being compressed mediolaterally; main shaft com-
pressed anterio-posteriorly and lacking pneumatiza-
tion.
3rd Cervical Vertebra: Prezygapophyses elongate
and narrow; diapophyses about one half total length
of vertebra with short pleurapophyses extending
posteriorly; most dorsally protruding part of neural
spine low, and on posterior one-third of vertebra
lying posterior to end of parapophyses; diapophyses
not bulbous and not extending lateral to prezy-
gapophyses, but continue posterior from ther so
that vertebra remains nearly same width as anterior-
most width to end of pleurapophyses; lateral
margins only slightly concave; deep pit on ventral
surface near anterior end; prominent bulbous ridge
along midline of centrum over posterior half of
centrum ends in two prominent blunt projections on
either side of midline ridge.
REC, S. AUST, MUS. 18(12): 235-264
September, 1981
4th Cervical Vertebra: Differs from 3rd only in
that dorsal-most expansion of neural spine occurs
just slightly posterior to midpoint and at same level
as ends of pleurapophyses; ventral pit near anterior
end deeper and more elongate; two ventral spines
present and very low.
Sternum: (dorso-anterior end only). Lacks dorsal
manubrial spine but broad-based ventral spine
present, extending anteriorly, not dorsally; coracoi-
dal sulci converge upon one another anteriorly,
forming a small obtuse angle; dorsal lips of
coracoidal sulci separated and markedly expanded
medially, tapering to a fine point posterio-laterally;
coracoidal sulci narrow, parallel-sided and deep,
being deepest near postero-lateral end; ventral lips
of coracoidal sulci straight, not curved or indented.
Scapula: Scapular blade not parallel-sided near
proximal end but rapidly narrows distally, becoming
parallel-sided near midpoint without any further
broadening; near distal end blade narrows to nearly
one half of previous width, terminating rapidly in
blunt process, not recurved; entire shaft of blade
nearly straight, not anteriorly concave; proximal
part of shaft quite deep (dorso-ventrally) becoming
more flattened distally, with prominent muscle scar
on dorsal surface well separated from the proximal
end (about one third of the total length of the
blade); furcular articulation on elongate process,
extending proximally beyond glenoid facet.
Coracoid: Coracoidal fenestra small but complete
and well separated from the internal border of the
coracoid; scapular facet deeply excavated; glenoid
facet not flattened but markedly concave latero-
internally; medial and lateral boundaries of shaft
nearly straight, not markedly concave or convex,
nearly perpendicular to long axis of shaft over
medial half and at small obtuse angle over lateral
half.
Humerus: Proximal end differs in palmar view
from other large birds including storks, cranes,
gannets, cormorants, and darters in ligamental
groove not extending from ventral edge as far
dorsally, and in being a pit rather than a groove, A
similar pit occurs also in albatrosses, but the
proximal end is more bulbous and rounded in
Pelecanus, whereas it is thinner and more angular in
Diomedea: Distal edge, as in waterbirds, orientated
at right angles to main axis of shaft and not obliquely
with a wide, protruding entepicondyle as in land
birds, penguins, and auks. Ectepicondylar spur
absent as in most waterbirds except for those in the
Procellariiformes and Charadriiformes. As in other
Pelecaniformes, distal end curved over more in
palmar direction than in other waterbirds. Within
Pelecanus this is more pronounced than in other
THE FOSSIL PELICANS OF AUSTRALASIA
extant genera of the order. The humeri of Pelecanus
are also decidely larger than those of other extant
genera in the order.
Femur: Trochanter low, with both it and head
extending an equal distance proximally; trochanter
and head not grading smoothly into one another but
separated by a distinct, broad channel; head large,
about 60 per cent of the length of the trochanter; in
lateral view, proximal border of trochanter only
slightly, not highly arched with the most proximal
extension lying slightly behind anterio-posterior
midpoint; no pneumatic foramen present near
proximal end on anterior surface.
Tibiotarsus (Distal end only): Internal condyle
extends far distad of external and is much more
elongate than internal; single supratendinal bridge
lacks any ligamental prominences on either medial
or lateral ends and forms small acute angle with long
axis of shaft; shaft lacks external flange just proximal
to external condyle; in distal view, condyles deep,
with internal slightly deeper than external; distal end
slightly broader anteriorly than posteriorly but
lacking any marked constriction near anteropos-
terior midpoint.
Tarsometatarsus (Distal end only): Trochlea I
longer (extending further distally) than trochlea IV;
in medial view, trochlea I] not extending far
posteriorly and lacking medial spike on posteriome-
dial border; trochlea II lacking medial groove
extending over entire trochlea but notched distally
and posteriorly; in distal view, medio-lateral axis
through trochlea II-IV not straight but arched.
SYSTEMATIC POSITIONS OF AUSTRALASIAN
FOSSIL MATERIAL
Australasian fossils referred to Pelecanus by De
Vis (1892, 1905; in Brown, 1894), Archey (1931),
Miller (1966), and Scarlett (1966) are summarized
with our determinations in Table 1 and on Figure 1.
We have re-examined most of this material and have
added to it a number of new specimens collected
over the past decade and a half.
Pelecanus tirarensis
Citation: Miller, A. H., 1966. Mem. Queensland
Museum, 14 (5), 182, Fig. la, c, e.
Holotype: Distal end, right tarsometatarsus SAM
P13858.
Locality and Age: Lake Palankarinna Site 3,
Turtle Quarry (UCMP V-5762), west side of lake,
South Australia, Etadunna Formation, Miocene.
28°48'S, 138°24'E.
Comment: The holotype of P. tirarensis (SAM
P13858) differs from the tarsometatarsi of living
237
pelicans (see Figure 2 and Tables 2, 3 and 4) in
having:
(1) an elongate trough developed on the posterior
margin of the medial surface of trochlea II,
separated from the ligamental pit by a slender ridge
that is orientated nearly due proximo-distally along
trochlea; this ridge trends posteriorly towards distal
end and broadens slightly; in all other species
examined this area is occupied by an elevated,
inflated ridge that continues all the way to the
posterior border of the trochlea, when trochlea I
viewed posteriorly; the presence of the trough in
P. tirarensis produces a more gracile trochlea over
much of its length, as pointed out by Miller (1966);
(2) a decidely narrower anterior margin of
trochlea II than posterior margin (in distal view)
rather than both approaching the same width.
Differs from P. occidentalis and P. erythrorhynchos
in having a trochlea II that extends much further
distally than trochlea IV; in P. occidentalis and P.
erythrorhynchos trochlea II extends only slightly
distad of trochlea IV; P. conspicillatus and P.
onocrotalus have trochlear conditions very similar to
those in P. firarensis.
Miller (1966) noted also that the size of the
ligamental pit on trochlea II is greater than that on
other pelicans; in our sample of P. conspicillatus this
character seems too variable to be of diagnostic
value, and our largest specimen (ANWC BS1202)
had a large ligamental pit approaching that of
P. tirarensis. Miller further noted that the distal
foramen was less elongate on the plantar surface
than that in P, conspicillatus; examination of our
sample of P. conspicillatus (n=20) bore this out, but
in the sample of P. erythrorhynchos (n=5) the
character varied from the condition in P. conspicil-
latus to that in P. tirarensis; P. onocrotalus and P.
occidentalis have distal foramina as in P. tirarensis.
From fragments of SAM P13858 available, we
cannot verify the position of the origin of the plantar
ridge on the posterior surface nor can we see this in
Miller’s illustrations. Thus, comparison of propor-
tions of the shaft (length vs. width) based on the
location of this feature seems impractical.
Referred Material: UCMP 60988: Distal end,
right tarsometatarsus, Lake Palankarinna, Site 6,
UCMP V-5765, 28°46'S, 138°25’E, South Australia,
Etadunna Formation, Miocene.
Comment: UCMP 60988 is very incomplete,
lacking trochlea IJ and with articular surfaces of
trochlea III and IV very worn so that the original
surface cannot be defined on trochlea IV (see Figure
3). Thus, the diagnostic characters defining
P. tirarensis cannot be evaluated sufficiently even
though the distal foramen is small and ovoid, as in
P. tirarensis, and the size is comparable (see Tables 2
238
and 3). We have therefore only tentatively referred
it to this species,
UCMP 113115: Distal end, right tarsometatarsus,
lacking distal end of trochlea [1 and totally lacking
trochlea [V, Leaf Locality, UCMP V-6213 Lake
Ngapakaldi, 28°18'S, 138°16'E, South Australia,
Wipajiri Formation, late Miocene.
Comment? UCMP 113115 lacks those areas
exhibiting characters diagnostic of P. tirarensis. Its
size is comparable to that species (see Figure 3 and
Table 3) and its distal foramen is of moderate size.
We therefore only tentatively refer it ta P. tirarensis.
AMNH_ 11494: Proximal end of right tar-
sometatarsus, lacking much of hypotarsus, Lake
Pinpa, 31°08'S, 140°12'E, southeast af Lake Frome,
Tarkarooloo Basin, South Australia, Namba Forma-
tion, Miocene,
Comment: AMNH 11494 is definitely pelecanid in
that the proximal articular surfaces are deep; the
intercotylar prominence is very prominent and is
restricted to the anterior part of the proximal end;
the hypotarsus viewed posteriorly, is triangular in
shape with the longest portion on the internal side;
there are two well defined calcaneal canals; the
anterior surface of the shaft near the proximal end 1s
deeply excayated with two large vascular foramina in
this deep excavation. AMNH 11494 is smaller than
the tarsometatarsi of Pelecanus conspicillarus, and
differs further in that the lateral caleaneal notch is
only slightly indicated and not deeply incised; the
anterior border of the lateral articular surface does
not form a sharp apex, but is rounded; the whole
lateral articular surface is relatively broader; viewed
antertorly, the external foramen is smaller and not as
enlarged as the internal foramen; the excavation of
the antenor surtace al the proximal end and further
distad is relatively deeper; the tubercle for tbialis
anticus is displaced onto the medial surface of the
excavated area on the anterior surtace rather than
being more or less centrally located: the foramina on
either side of the hypotarsus are relatively smaller
than in P. conspicillatus.
Because AMNH 11494 is badly eroded, only the
following measurements were practical; width across
proximal end @ 18 mm; and depth across lateral
articular surface and lateral caleaneal ridge of
hypotarsus @ 14 mm. In P. conspicillarus these
parameters are width: n = 10, range 23-24 mm,
mean 23 mm, s.d. 1 mm; and depth n = 10, range
17-20 mm, mean 18 mm, ¢.d. 1 mm. Because of its
size and age we refer AMNH 11494 tentatively to
P. tirdrensis.
QM F10703; Distal end of left tarsometatarsus,
Crocpot 1, south end of Lake Palankarina, 28°46’,
138°28'E, South Australia, Etadunna Formation,
Miocene
REC. S. AUST. MUS, 18(12): 235-264
September, 1981
Comment; QM F10703 fits within the above
description of the holotype, except that the
proximodistal ridge does not broaden towards the
distal end; we, therefore, refer it to P. jirarensis.
Pelecanus proayus
Citation:
De Vis. 1892, Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales,
2(6): 444 Pl.24,
Holotype:
sometatarsus,
Locahty and Age: Darling Downs, 28°S, 150°.
Queensland, Quaternary.
No number (type lost), left tar-
Comment; Tarsometatarsus, Miller (1966) re-
evaluated this left tarsometatarsus and assigned it to
P. conspicillatus; the illustrations provided by De Vis
(1892) are not helpful in making this assignment,
Based on the illustrations, jt appears that the distal
foramen in Pelecanus proavus is nat rounded, but is
not as elongate as those in our sample of
P. conspicillatus, being more like that in P.
onocrotalus. This may he due to inaccurate
illustration of damage to trochleae, which De Vis
(1892) mentions.
De Vis’ illustrations also indicates that there is
litle flare of the distal end of the tarsometatarsus of
P. proavus, which mast closely approaches the
condition in P. onecrotalus. In most P. conspicillarus,
P. erythrorhynchos, and P. occidentalis this flare,
particularly on the internal margin of the shaft, is
more pronounced.
The measurements made from De Vis’ illustra-
tions of the holotype suggest a medium-sized
pelican, such as P. rufescens and P. philtppensis.
However, we are not entirely convinced that De Vis"
illustrations are accurate because of the discrepancy
between his measurement of the trochlear expansion
and curs of the distal width of the illustration of the
fossil, both of which appear ta be the same
measurement, De Vis (1892) originally recorded the
‘width of the trochleat expansion’ as 16.5 mm, but
our measurements of maximum width of the distal
end made from Figures 6a, 6b, Plate 24 were 18_0-
18.6 mm (see Table 2).
Thus, at present until] the onginal specimen is
available we reserve judgment on the validity of
P. proavus.
Carpometacarpus; De Vis (1892) assigned a
proximal carpometacarpal fragment, QM F1141, to
P. proavus, but we concur with Miller (1966) that itis
nol pelecanid.
Femur; De Vis (1905) assigned a distal right temur
fragment (QM F3752, Lower Cooper Creek, South
THE FOSSIL PELICANS OF AUSTRALASIA
Australia, Quaternary) ta P, proavus, When we
compared it with femora of large pelicans,
?. conspicillatus and P. onocrotalus, we could find no
appreciable differences (see Figure 4 and Table $).
De Vis (1905) mentions that the fibular groove is
more extensive in P. proavus, covering most of the
fibular condyle and making it concave posteriorly
further distad than in P, conspicillatus. Additionally,
the ectepicondylar region in the extitict bird was
supposedly comparatively narrow and rather deeply
sunken between the trochlea and the ectepicondylar
edge, the cavity formed extending distad nearly two-
thirds of the Jength of the trochlea (De Vis, 1905:
17). These characters are so similar in some
specimens of the modern Australian Pelican that this
fossil is best referred to P. conspicillatus,
Tibiotarsus: De Vis (1905) assigned the distal end
of a right fbiotarsus (QM F3753, Lower Cooper
Creek, South Australia, Quaternary), damaged on
the internal condyle, to P. proavus, nating that there
was nothing to distinguish it from the extinct form.
Our comparisons with other large pelicans including
P, conspicillatus, have revealed no diagnostic
characters that set his fossil tibiotarsus apart (see
Figure 4 and Table 6), and thus it should he referred
to P. conspicillatus as Miller (1966) suggested.
Pelecanus. conspicillatus
Citation
Pelecanus conspicillatus Temminck, 1824 Planches
col, Oiseaux 47; pl.276,
New Synonymy of Fossil Forms
Pelecanus validipes. De Vis, 1894 (in Brown,
Proc. Parl. So, Aust,, 2(25): 21, pl. 11, 5-6).
Archagocycnus lacustris (in part) De Vis, 1905
(Ann. Qld, Mus., 6:13).
Pelecanus grandiceps. De Vis, 1905 (Ann. Qld.
Mus., 6: 16, Pl. V, Figs 1-3)
Fossil Material Described by De Vis
Pelecanus validipes
Holotype: Distal end of a right tarsometatarsus,
SAM 18412, Warburton River, South Australia,
Quaternary,
Comment: Contrary to the comments made by De
Vis (in Brown, 1894) we have found. that (see Fig.
2):
(1) the middle trochlea (III) is not broader than
that in P. conspicillatus;
(2) the hallucal depression is no better defined (in
fact ANWC BS1363, P. conspicillatus, matches the
condition in ?. validipes);
239,
(3) the dorsal sulcus is not any deeper nor the
bounding ridges more well defined than in
P. conspicillatus:
(4) the distal end of the plantar ridge is no
straighter than in some P. conspicillarus; and
(5) P. validipes is within the size range of the
living P. conspicillatus that we have measured (sce
Tables 2, 3 and 4).
Thus, we suggest that Pelecanus validipes be
synonymized with P. conspicillarus.
Archagacycnus lacustris (in part)
Relevant Syntype: Fragment of 4th cervical
vettebra (QM F5529), unknown locality,
Comment: Among a series of bones that De Vis
(1905) named Archaeocycnus lacustris, a new genus
and species of swan, was a cervical vertebra that is
not anatid, but pelecanid (see Fig, 3). The vertebra
is quite eroded anteriorly and dorsally and thus
preserves few useful characters. It is, however, of a
pelican within the size range of P, conspicillatus (see
Table 7) to which species it should be referred and
removed from the Anatidae and the syntypes of
Archaeocyenus lacustris.
Pelecanus grandiceps
Lectotype: Miller, 1966: QM F3751, left distal end
of a tarsometatarsus, Lower Coaper Creek, South
Australia Quaternary,
Comment: Miller (1966) in his review of
Australian pelicans chose to retain this species as
distinct from the extant Australian pelican,
P. conspicillatus because of the following features of
the lectotype tarsometatarsus: (1) large size; (2)
‘presence of a deep pit on the plantar surface
between the bases of trochleae [If and Il’ (Miller
1966: 187); and (3) ‘a greater breadth and flattening
of the trochlear ridges on the anterior surface (of
trochlear IT)’ (Miller 1966: 187).
QM F3751 (see Fig. 2 and Tables 3 and 4) only
shghtly exceeds in size the tarsometatarsi of
P. conspicillatus in only one out. of four measure-
ments that are practical on the fossil. We doubt that
this difference is significant. The deep pit on the
plantar surface between the bases of trochleae [] and
If, present on QM F3751 is represented by only a
tiny foramen on a specimen that Miller (1966)
referred to this species (UCMP 56322, Lower
Cooper Creek site 8, UCMP V-5860, South
Australia, Quaternary) (see Fig. 3 and Table 4), In
our sample of recent P. conspicillatus one specimen
(AN WC BS1272) exhibited a distinct pit on the night
tarsometatarsus and a pinhole foramen on the left
tarsometatarsus. Thus, this character seems quite
variable between and even within individuals and
not particularly useful taxonomically for the genus
24U
Pelecanus. The anterior ridges on trochlea [IT
increase in breadth and flattening with size, and our
largest specimens af P. conspicillatus approach or
match that of P, grardiceps
Thus, we suggest that Pelecanits grandiceps be
synonymized with P. conspicillatus,
Quadrate: De Vis (1905) named a fragmentary
left quadrate (QM F3749, Lower Cooper Creek,
South Australia, Quatetnary), P. grandiceps,
because of qualitative differences as well as a
distinctly larger size than P, conspicillatus. We agree
with Miller (1966) that, in fact, this specimen is
within the range of variability of the living
P. conspicillatus (see Fig. 3 and Table 8), and we
therefore refer it ta this species,
Coracoid: De Vis (1905) assigned to P. grandiceps
a left coracoid (QM F37S0, Lower Cooper Creek,
South Australia, Quaternary), lacking both dorsal
and yentral ends but including most of the glenoid
facet and part of the scapular facet, Although not
preserving much that is diagnostic, the position af
the coracaidal fenestra in the fossil form more
closely approaches that in P. onacrotalus, where the
coracaidal fenestra is displaced further !aterad from.
the medial margin and thus is positioned nearer the
centre of the coracoidal shaft than in most of our
sample of P. conspicillatus. Because of the lack of a
more complete bone, it is difficult to interpret the
significance of this character, and because jt js
similar in size to those af modern P. conspicillatus
(see Fig, 4 and Table 9) we refer it to this species as
suggested by Miller (1966).
In conclusion, we can see no yalid reasans for
maintaining Pelecanus grandiceps as a species
distinct from P. conspicillatus.
Additional Material
Quadrate: UCMP 56321, left, Cooper Creek, Site
8, UCMP ¥V-5860, 28°34'S 138°00'E, South Aus-
tralia, Quaternary, Left quadrate nearly complete
except for erosion along some articular surfaces.
Together with those of other living species of
pelicans, this specimen differs from that of
P. occidentalis in that the pneumatic foramen lies on
jnternal rather than external surfaces; the otic
process is short rather than elongate giving the
quadrate a remarkably different shape, Allowing for
variability in modetn populations of pelicans, only
the much larger P, onacrotalus can be ruled out. The
fossil quadrate is similar in size to quadrates of
several living species, including P. conspicillatus, and
thus we follow Miller (1966) 1n referring it to this
species (see Fig. 3 and Table 8).
Palatines: UCMP 60702, fused palatines, Cooper
Creek, Maikuni Waterhale 28°34'S 138°09'E, South
Australia, UCMP V-5382, Quaternary. We follow
REC, 5, AUST. MUS, 18(12): 235-264
September. 198]
Miller (1966) in
P. conspicillaius.
Vertebrae; UICMP 56394, posterior half of 3rd
cervical vertebra, Cooper Creek, Site 7, 28°33'S
138°10'FE UCMP ¥V-5859, South Austraha, Quater-
nary. Miller (1966) assigned this specimen to
P. conspicillatus. tn size it matches measurements of
several of the larger pelicans (see Fig. 3 and Tables
10 and 11), and we can find no diagnostic differences
from any of these forms, including P. conspicillarus,
Thus we refer it ta this species.
referring this specimen to
Sternum: UCMP 61656, anterior fragment of
sternum, Cooper Creek, Site 18, 28°35'S 138°08'E,
UCMP V-6147. South Australia, Quaternary.
Although larger than any of our sample of
P, occidentalis, this specimen falls again in the range
of the larger pelicans, except for perhaps
P, onocrotalus (see Fig.. 3 and Table 12), and is se
fragmentary that definite assignment to any species
is tather senseless. We follow Miller (1966) in
referring it ta P. conspicillaius,
Coracoid: QM F6669, fragment of a left coracoid,
Lower Cooper Creek, South Australia, Quaternary-
Although part of a collection made during the
summer of 1901/2 by J. W. Gregory and his students
during the Melbourne University Lake Eyre
Expedition, we are not aware that De Vis and Miller
have cammented on this specimen in print. We refer
QM F6669 (see Table 9) to P, conspicillarus as it is
within the size range of this species and we can
discern no qualitative differences,
UCMP 60487, fragment of a left coracoid, Cooper
Creek, Site 8, UCMP V-S860, Quaternary. We refer
this specimen to P. conspicillatus in agreement with
Miller (1966).
Ulna: UCMP 56348, distal end of left ulna,
Cooper Creek, Site 16, UCMP V-5868, South
Australia, Quaternary, UCMF 60520, distal end of
left ulna whose articular surfaces are eroded,
Cooper Creek, Sire 8, UCMP V-5860, South
Australia, Quaternary. We agree with Miller (1966)
in referring these specimens to P, conspicillatus (see
Fig 2 and Table 13).
Cuneiform: UUCMP 60503, left cuneiform, Cooper
Creek, Site 8, UCMP ¥V-5860, South Australia,
Quaternary; UCMP 460549, right cuneiform, Lake
Kanunka, Site 2, UCMP V-5773, 28°23'S, 138°17'E,
South Australia Katipiri Sands, Quaternary, We
agree with Miller (1966) in referring these specimens
to P. conspicillatus (see Fig. 2 and Table 14).
Femur: UCMP 604777, proximal fragment of night
fernur, Cooper Creek, Site 8, UCMP V-5860, South
Australia, Quaternary, Miller (1966) assigned this
specimen to P, conspicillatus but because of the Jack
of any diagnostic differences either in morphology or
TELE FOSSIL PELICANS OF AUSTRALASIA
size with most other large pelicans (see Pig, 4 and
Table 15), we can only refer it to this species,
P. rufescens and P, occidentalis appear to be
distinctly smaller, and P. crispus (based on one
specimen) has a flattened, not curved, trochanter
(viewed laterally), which does not slope anterior-
wards as it does in UCMP 6(1477.
Tibtotarsus: UCMP 60521, very fragmentary,
Distal right, tibiotarsus, Cooper Creek, Site 8,
UCMP V-5860, South Australia, Quaternary,
Because of the incompleteness of this specimen,
little can be said of its affinities except ta the family
Pelecanidae, It falls within the size range of P.
conspicillatus and several other large pelicans (see
Fig, 4 and Table 6). Therefore, we refer it
tentatively to P. censpicillatus.
Humerus: UCMP 60640, very fragmentary distal
left humerus with only external and internal
condyles and external margin preserved, Cooper
Creek, Site 18, UCMP V-6147, South Australia,
Quaternary. Miller (1966) placed it in P. canspicil-
latus. In size and shape it is similar to the humeri of
P. conspicillatus and other large species of pelican
(see Fig. 3 and Table 16). We therefore tentatively
refer UCMP 60640 to P. conspicillatus.
Scapula: UCMP 56633, right scapula missing parts
of the glenoid facet and furcular articulation,
Warburton River, Marcus Locality, 27°S5'S,
138°00'E, UCMP ¥V-5569, South Australia, Quater-
nary. The distance between the fureular facets is
very narrow, but this character is extremely variable
even within P. conspicillatus. The angle at which the
two furcular facets meet (in ventral view) is slightly
preater than 90°, but this varies from an acute to
slightly obtuse in P. oonspicillatus, In our small
samples. it is slightly obtuse in P. occidentalis and
P. onocrotalus and acute in P. erythrorhynchos, In
size UCMP 56633 js similar to the scapulae of the
larger species of pelican (see Fig. 3 and Table 17),
and we therefore tentatively refer it to P.
conspieillatus.
Pelecanus novaezealandiae
Citation! Pelecanus conspicillatus novaezealan-
didae. Scarlett, 1966, Notormis 13: 204, Fig. 1 1-11.
Holotype: Large pact of a single skeleton
including mandibular fragments, left quadrate,
pelvis, right and left humerus, right ulna, right and
left radii, right and left carpometacarpi, left scapula,
right and left coracoids, right and left femora, right
tibiotarsus, right and left fibulae, right and left
tarsometatarsi, and several vetebrae, CM AV21355,
Locality and Age: Poukawa, Site I, Hawkes Bay,
New Zealand, (39°45'S, 176°43'E) Quaternary,
between 3500 and 4500 years B,P, The holotype was
mH
found just below the Waimihia Ash, a band of airfall
volcanic ash, that was deposited 3440 + 70 years
B.P. (pers. comm. FP. Horn 1979).
Diagnosis: Very large pelican, Differs from recent
large pelicans in that its pelvis is distinctly broader
and more robust (see Fig, 5 and Tables 2-6, 9, 13.
15-19) particularly across supratrochanteric proces-
ses; iloischiatic foramen not extremely elongate.
thus. differing from P. conspicillatus and more
resembling P. oneerotalus; proximal end of femur
wider than largest of Pelecanus, although most other
measurements overlap. Tarsonietatarsus longer than
femur as in P, conspicillatus and not shorter as in
P. onocrotalus.
Referred Material: Partial skeleton (no number,
now lost), Archey (1931), cave deposits near Lake
Waikaremoana, North Island (38°47'S, 117°06'E);
right coracoid (CM AV15089), right humerus (CM
AV12264), left femur (CM AV12482) and proximal
end, right humerus (CM A¥V13095), Marfell Beach,
Lake Grassmere, South [sland (41°42'S, 174°10'E);
distal left ribiotarsus (AWMM AU5845,1), Puheke
Beach, Kacikari Peninsula, North Island (34°55'S,
173°22'E); left tibiotarsus and fragments of a lefr
ulna (private callectian of Peter Horn), type locality
Poukawa, Site N141/i: part of fused furcula and
sternal keel (CM A¥V32001) type locality, Poukawa,
all Holocene in age.
Comment: Searlett (1966) nated most of the
characters we have utilized to define the species,
Pelecanus novaezealandiae. Because his sample of
modern pelicans was so small, he chose to recognise
the New Zealand form as only a separate subspecies.
With our additional samples, we believe that the
New Zealand form is sufficiently distiact, especially
in the robustness of the pelvis and proximal hind
limb, that it rates separation as a species.
Pelecanus cadimurka n. sp.
Holotype: SAM P22501, left tarsometatarsus
fragment lacking trochlea 1V and with some erosion
of posterior border of trochlea If (see Fig. 6).
Locality and Age: Kuttipirra (Katipir)
Waterhole, Cooper Creek Site 9, UCMP V-S586l,
28°33'S, 138°06'E, South Australia, Quaternary.
Etymology: Cadimurka (Aboriginal), noun in
apposition, Brown (1894:5) in reporting the
presence of bones of extinct animals at several places
along the Warburton River, mainly along the edges
of large waterholes, writes that “The natives account
for the presence of these bones by saying that they
belong to the cadimurka, a large fish which lives in
the bottom of the waterholes, and which has
consequently never been seen by them’, One of the
bones picked up by Brown on the Warburton River
add
is the holotype of Pelecunus validipes, and the
matenal of P. cadimurka has been subsequently
found in the same area,
Diagnosis: Small pelican in the size range of
P. occidentalis and P. rufescens. distinctly smaller
than P. conmspicillarus and all other living species of
pelican (see Fig. 2, 6 and 7 and Tables 2, 3 and 4),
Where comparable publistied tossil material exists,
only P. tirarensis and P. gracilis are of similar size. In
medial view trochlea Il lacks a deep channel on
posterior border of medial surface, thus differing
from P, lirarensis, Trochlea Wf and Ill extend an
equal distance distally, unlike in most other pelicans,
including P. occidentalis and P, conspictilatus where
{Tf is distinctly Jonger, [In distal view, trochlea IT is
relatively narrow with posterior and anterior borders
of nearly equal width, differing from (1)
P, conspicillatus, which tends to be broader overall
and laterally expanded along the posterior border,
(2) P. tirarensis where the anterior border js
decidedly narrower than the posterior, and (3) P.
occidentalis, which tends to be broader, Trochlea [11
is deep and nat shallow as in P. occidentalis, thus
more closely approaching the condition in P.
conspicillatus. Trochlea IIT is relatively slender, end
not as broad as in P, firarensis (see Fig. 2), In
posterior view, articular surface of trochlea Il
terminates in a distinet apex proximally and is not
squared off as in P. occidentalis. The shape of the
distal foramen is not long and slit-like as in P.
conspicillatus but more closely approximates those
of P. onoerotalus and P. occidentalis.
Referred Material: UCMP 60577-60578. Two
distal fragments of right tarsometatarsi with all three
trochlea represented, Lake Kanunka, Site 2. UCMP
V-5773, 28°23'S, 138°17'E, South Australia, Quater-
nary. Both specimens are slightly smaller than any of
our samples of Pelecanus conspicillaius, about the
size of P. tirarensis (See Fig. 3 and Tables 2, 3 and 4),
On trochlea II, the posterior channel that
characterizes P. firarensis is not present, thus
eliminating this species, In UCMP 60578 there is a
small posterior depréssion in this area, but this
condition can be matched in our sample of
P. conspicillatus. The distal foramen is intermediate
in shape between those of P. conspicillatus and
P. firarensis. more like those of P. onocratalus and
P, erythrorhynehos, but this character may quite
likely vary somewhat with broader sampling. The
trochleae of UCMP 60577 do not appear to flare as
broadly distally as they do in P, conspicillatus and
P. tirarensis, more closely approaching the condition
in P. wnocrotalus. Because parts of UCMP 60577
have been eroded, however, a final evaluation of
this character is advisable, In both specimens,
trochlea [Ll extends far distad of trochlea IV as in
other large pelicans including P, tirarensis, distingu-
ishing it from P, eccidenralis and P, erythrorhynchos,
REC. 8, AUST. MUS. 18(2): 235-264
September, 1981
Comment! Although these two specimens are
somewhat intermediate is size berween the holotype
ot P. cadimurka and the tarsonletatarsi of
P. conspicillatus, they appear to be qualitatively
distinct from the latter as well as those ot PF. urarensis
and P. occidenralis. The specimens compare well
with the holotype of P. cadimnurka and thus will be
referred to that new species. Miller (1966) had
previously assigned both the above specimens to P
conspicilatus,
Our measurements trom the De Vis figures of the
holotype tarsometatarsus af P. proapus are within
the ranges of those of the P, cadimurka material but
because of a discrepancy between De Vis’ and our
measurements (see above) we doubt the scale of his
figures and do not feel jusofied in ceferring the
material of P. cadimurka to P. proavus. Further-
more, trochlea Ill is figured substanually longer
than trochlea Ef in P. proawus and thus differs trom
the holotype of P. cadimurka,
UCMP 123382; Nearly complete 4th cervical
vertebra, Cooper Creek, Site 8, V-5860, South
Australia, Quaternary,
Comment: The vertebra is much smaller than any
of P, conspicillatus in our sample (see Table 7)
although very similar in shape. Also it is more
gracile than those al P, occidentalis, which are
anterla-posteriorly compressed and more robust. It
differs further from those of P. occidentalis, and ts
similar to those of P. conspicillatus, in lacking paired
ridges over posterior half of ventral surface and in
having a decidedly shallower pit just posterior to
anterior articular surface of centrum on ventral
surface. The Yertebra may be, relative to total
length, shghtly broader across ventral surface of
centrum ou posterior half than in P. conspteillatus. It
appeats that this represents a species of pelican
smaller than the extant and the Quaternary
P_ conspicillatus, and we have therefore referred it to
P_ cadimurka,
Not Pelecanidae, UCMP 69587. Proximal end,
night humerus, Lake Kanunka, UCMP Y-5773,
South Australia, Quaternary.
Comment: Miller (1966) assigned this specimen to
P conspicillatus. Upon re-examination we find that
the humerus is certainly within the size range of
some living pelicans, but it shows considerable
morphologic differences from all Pelecanidae. In
UCMP 69587 the ligamental furrow is deeper, The
bicipital furrow is deeply excavated instead of flat
In proximal view, the head narrows consideiably
near the external tuberosity, and is not bulbous.
In all of these characters, the fossil so closely
resembles members of the Accipitridae that it should
be transferred to this family. [t appears to represent
@ plant raptor, larger lhan the living Wedge-tailed
THE FOSSIL PELICANS OF AUSTRALASIA
Eagle, Aguila audax and more similar in size to the
extinct New Zealand Eagle, Harpagornis moorei.
COMPARISON OF AUSTRALIAN FORMS WITH
OTHER FOSSIL PELICANS
Brodkorb (1963) lists eight fossil species af
pelicans, and recently Harrison and Walker (1976)
have reported a ninth, Pelecanus aethiopicus from
East Africa. Many of these are not directly
comparable with most of the Australasian material
except P. novaezealandiae. P. intermedius and
P. fraasi, both from the Miocene of Europe, are
known only from cranial material; P. haliews from
the early Pleistocene of North Ametica, a radius
representing a bird the size of P. erythrarhynchas;
Liptornis hesternus from the Miocene af Argentina, a
lower cervies! vertebra, whereas the Australian
material is represented by higher cervicals.
P. aethiapicus from the Middle Pleistacene of East
Africa is nat directly comparable ta Australian
fossils as it is represented only by a proximalend of a
tarsometatarsus and a scapula; scapulae of both
P. aethiopicus and one Australian Pleistocene fossil
pelican are so worn and broken that qualitative
comparisons are futile, although they are clearly
wilhin the same size range,
The remaining fossil pelicans are at least
represented by materials comparable ta Australian
specimens. P, gracilis (proximal humerus, femur,
scapula, partial tarsometatarsus):; P. cautleyi, (distal
ulna); P, sivalensis, (distal ulna); and. P, edessanus
(coracoid, tarsometatarsus).
As Miller (1966) pointed out, P. gracilis from the
early Miocene (Aquitanian) of Europe is decidedly
smaller and more slender-legged than P, conspicil-
latus, Unfortunately, because nothing is known of
the distal part of the tarsometatarsus, it cannot be
compared with P. firarensis or P. cadimurka,
although it is clearly in this size range.
P. cautleyi and P. sivalensis. based on distal ends
of wlnae from the Pliocene of India are smaller than
the living P. conspicillarus, (Miller, 1966) and
although within the size range of P. mrarensis and
P. cadimurka, cannot be compared directly,
P, odessanus from the early Pliocene of Russia is
similar in Size to the living P. conspicillatus, thos
larger than P. tirarensis and P. cadimurka. It difters
from FP. conspicillaius in the shape of the trechlea,
ridges, and muscle scars of the tarsometatarsus
(Miller. 1966),
STRATIGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF
PELECANIDAE WITHIN AUSTRALASTA
Fossil pelicans are known from three parts of the
siratigeaphie column in Australasia, and direct
243
correlation with sediments bearing pelecanid fossils
elsewhere in the world is only approximate.
P. tirarensis accuts in the Etadunna Formation
and possibly the Wipajiri Formation of the Lake
Eyre Basin, Central Australia. The Etadunna
Formation overlies fluviatile rocks dated as
Paleocene-Eocene because of contained plant
remains, Unfortunately, none of the vertebrate
bearing sediments has datable plant remains, and
lithologic correlation must be used ta tie the
vertebrate bearing outcrops with subsurface geologic
sections bearing such plant remains. Further
correlation with plant-bearing marine sections to the
south allow a tentative assignment of the Etadunna
rocks to a mid-Tertiary, Oligo-Miocene age (Stirtan
et al, 1968), Correlation by use of fossil mammal
remains with the Namba Formation, further to the
southeast, which bears. pollen basally, suggests a
post Batefordian—Baleombian age of abour 14-16
million years BP (Tedford, et al., 1977). Based
primarily on marsupial mammalian correlations. the
Wipajitt Formation, which is channelled into the
Etadunna, is thought ta be of mid to late Miocene
age. (See Rich. 1979 for a summary of the
stratigraphy).
The remaining fossil pelicans of Australia have
been collected from a number of sites along Cooper
Creek, at Lake Kanunka (north of Cooper Creek},
and along the Warburton River, all in the Lake Eyre
Basin of northeastern South Australia; and on the
Darling Downs of southeastern Queensland, All of
these have been called Quaternary or Pleistocene tn
age, Locales along the Cooper and Warburton
Rivers include fossils found both as ‘float’ on the
surface and in place and are often associated with
marsupials normally restricted to Pleistocene—aged
sediments within Australia, Because many were
collected out of a stratigraphic context, placement
within the Pleistocene or even within the Recent is
not certain, Dating of the Darling Downs verte-
ebrates is based primarily on correlation using
marsupial mammals, some species of which are
entirely restricted to the Pleistocene, while others
range from Pleistocene into the Recent,
New Zealand pelican fossils are known from
several localities on both North and Sauth Islands.
All are no older than Holocene (see above),
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
Pelecanus conspicillatus is the only extant pelican
in Australasia. This has certainly not always been
the case, During the last 2 million years, in the
Quaternary, as many ag 3 species Were present in
this biogeographic province, including: a smiali.
gracile form, P. cadimurka, n. sp.; a very large,
robust species, P. novaezealandiae: as well as a form
244
osteologically indistinguishable from the extant
P. conspicillatus. P. conspicillatus and P. cadimurka
were sympatric and contemporaneous in central
Australia, a situation reflected by the modern broad
geographic overlap of the small P. rufescens and the
large P. onocrotalus in Africa. Likewise, the possible
sympatry of P. conspicillatus and P. novaezealandiae
is mirrored in the modern avifauna by the overlap of
the large pelicans, P. crispus (the more gracile form)
and P. onocrotalus (the more robust form) in the
western Palaearctic. In fact, P. novaezealandiae,
known only as a fossil from New Zealand, was
contemporaneous with P. conspicillatus in Australia,
suggesting probable overlap in distribution for such
large mobile birds.
Only one other fossil pelican species is known
from Australia, Pelecanus tirarensis, of Miocene age.
It was a small form morphologically distinct from all
later species,
Our review of all the Australasian fossil pelicans
and comparison with all the recent pelicans support
the inclusion in the synonomy of P. conspicillatus of:
P, validipes, P. grandiceps and in part Archaeocyc-
nus lacustris, Although we agree with Miller (1966)
that of the three specimens De Vis referred to
P, proavus, one is not of a pelican and the other two
may be referred to P. conspicillatus, the illustrations
of the last holotype suggest a pelican distinct from
P. conspicillatus. Thus, determination of the status
of P. proavus is impracticable unless the holotype is
relocated. Provisionally the mame should be
retained. Our review has also demonstrated the
necessity for recognizing as a new species of small
and gracile pelican, P. cadimurka, and for elevating
to specific status P. noveazealandiae, which Scarlett
had named as a sub-species of P. conspicillatus.
REC. 8. AUST. MUS, 18(12): 235-264
September, 1981
As a result of this study, we have been impressed
by the uniformity in skeletal morphology of the
pelican species we examined, except for that of the
New World Brown Pelican, P. occidentalis, Being
the only diving pelican it is so distinctive in many
aspects of its biology and morphology, that further
study may well indicate it meriting separated generic
status in Leptopelicanus Reichenbach 1852 (1853),
Avium Syst. Nat.: 7,
REFERENCES
ARCHEY, G., 1931. Skeleton of an Australian pelican found
With moa bones, Rec. Auck, Instr. Mus. 1: 116-121.
BRODKORB, P., 1963, Catalogue of fossil birds. Pt, 1 Bul
Florida State Mus,, 7; 179-293,
BROWN, H.Y.L., 1894. Report of the Government Geologist
for year ended June 30, 1894. Government Printer,
Adelaide. 26pp.
DE VIS, C. W., 1892 (1891). Residue of the extinct birds of
Queensland as yet detected. Proc. Linn, Soc. NSW, 2(V1):
437-456,
DE VIS, C. W,, 1905, A contribution to the knowledge of the
extinct avifauna of Australia. Ann. Queenslund Mus,, 6:
1-25,
HARRISON, C. J. O.,and WALKER, C. A.,.1976. A new fossil
pelican from Olduvai. Bull) Br. Mus. Nat. Hist, (Geol.) 27,
4; 315-320,
MILLER, A. H., 1966. The fossil pelicans of Australia. Mem.
Queensland Mus., 14: 181-190,
NORTHCOTE, E. M., 1979. Determination of age and sex of
long bones of Mute Swan Cygnus olor, [bis 121: 74-80.
RICH, P. V., 1979, The Dromornithidae, an extinct family of
Jarge ground birds endemic to Australia. Bur. Min, Res.
Bull. 184: 1-196.
SCARLETT, R,, 1966. A pelican in New Zealand. Notornis
13(4); 204-217.
STIRTON, R. A., TEDFORD, R. H., and WOODBURNE,
M. O., 1968. Australian Tertiary deposits containing
terrestrial mammals. Univ. Calif. Pub. Geol. Sei. 77: 1-30.
TEDFORD, R. H., ARCHER, M., BARTHOLOMAI, A.,
PLANE, M., PLEDGE, N. S., RICH, T., RICH, P., and
WILLS, R. T., 1977. The discovery of Miocene vertebrates,
Lake Frome area, South Australia. Bur. Min. Res. Jour.
Aust, Geol. Geophys. 2: 53-57.
THE FOSSIL PELICANS OF AUSTRALASIA 245
TABLE 1
Fossil specimens assigned to the genus Pelecanus from the Cainozoic of Australasia
Specimens available
to:
PVR
A.H. GFv1
Specimen De Vis Miller (this
Number Element Old Name New Name (1905) (1966) paper)
AMNH 11494 p, R. tarsometatarsus — rf. tirarensis — — ff
Lost, De Vis d. L, tarsometatarsus proavus (holotype) ? proavus 4 _ —
SAM P13858 sd. R. tarsometatarsus tirarensis (holotype) tirarensis — J dV
SAM P18412_ d. R. tarsometatarsus validipes (holotype) rf. conspicillatus Y —_ F
SAM P22501_— d. L. tarsometatarsus — cadimurka, n. sp. (holotype) — - v
QM F1141 p. R. carpometacarpus proavus not pelican f " v
QM F3749 L. quadrate grandiceps rf. conspicillatus Wa J J
QM F3750 L, coracoid grandiceps rf, conspicillatus Vv J V
QM F3751 d. L. tarsometatarsus grandiceps (lectotype) rf. conspicillatus i J if
QM F3752 d. R. femur proavus tf. conspicillatus J J J
QM F3753 d. R. tibiotarsus proavus (syntype) rf. conspicillatus J vf Vf
QM F5529 4th cervical vertebra Archaeocycnus lacustris rf. conspicillatus J = J
QM F6669 L. coracoid _ rf, conspicillatus — — v
QM F10703 d. L. tarsometatarsus — rf. tirarensis — — J
UCMP 56321 —_L. quadrate conspicillatus rf. conspicillatus _— v J
UCMP 56322 d, L, tarsometatarsus grandiceps rf. conspicillatus — Vv Vv
UCMP 56348 d. L. ulna conspicillatus rf. conspicillatus — / J
UCMP 56394 3rd ceryical vertebra conspicillatus rf. conspicillatus — Fi v
UCMP 56633 R, scapula — rf. conspicillatus oe — Z
UCMP 60477 p. R. femur conspicillatus rf. conspicillatus — vf J
UCMP 60487 — L. coracoid conspicillatus rf, conspicillatus _— J J
UCMP 60503 —_L, cuneiform conspicillatus rf. conspicillatus _ J J
UCMP 60520 d. L, ulna conspicillatus rf, conspicillatus — J" if
UCMP 60521 d. R. tibiotarsus conspicillatus rf. conspicillatus = J J
UCMP 60549 — R. cuneiform conspicillatus rf. conspicillatus — Vv J
UCMP 60577. d. R. tarsometatarsus conspicillatus rf. cadimurka, n. sp. — J J
UCMP 60578 = d. R. tarsometatarsus conspicillatus tf, cadimurka, n. sp. i J Vv
UCMP 60640 d. L. humerus conspicillatus tf. conspicillatus _ " J
UCMP 60656 Ant, sternum conspicillatus rf. conspicillatus _ Vv
UCMP 60702 fused palatines conspicillatus rf. conspicillatus — J _—
UCMP 60988 d. R. tarsometatarsus _ tf. tirarensis — — J
UCMP 69587 p. R. humerus conspicillatus Accipitridae — Vv Vv
UCMP 113115 d. R. tarsometatarsus — rf. tirarensis — a J
UCMP 123382 4th cervical vertebra = rf. cadimurka n. sp. — J v
Scar-
Archey leit PVR
(1931) (1966) GFvT
CM AV12264 R, humerus conspicillatus
novaezealandiae tf. novaezealandiae — 4 vl
CM AV12482 d. L. femur conspicillatus
novaezealandiae rf. novaezealandiae — J .
CM AV13095_ p, R. humerus conspicillatus
novaezealandiae tf. novaezealandiae _— Vv .
CM AV15089 — R. coracoid conspicillatus
novaezealandiae rf. novaezealandiae — rd of
CM AV21355 _ partial skeleton conspicillatus
novaezealandiae (holotype) novaezealandiae _ J /
CM AV32001 — part of fused furcula —
and sternum tf. novaezealandiae — Z
Lost, Archey partial skeleton conspicillatus
novaezealandiae tf. novaezealandiae J J —
AWNM
AVS845.1 d. L. tibiotarsus _ rf. novaezealandiae = —
Horn, no No,
L. tibiotarsus
rf. novaezealandiae
246 REC. S, AUST. MUS. 18(12): 235-264 September, 1981
TABLE 2
Measurements in mm of tarsometatarsi of recent and Australasian fossil pelicans
Width of At proximal end of distal foramen
distal end Width of shaft Depth of shaft
n range x sd n range x sd n Tange x sd
FOSSIL
P. tirarensis
SAM P13858 type... 0-22 19,6
UCMP 60988 rf... eee @12.0 8.3
P. cadimurka
LEGMP 60577 £8. eae pete pace Battal 18.5 14.2 8.8
UCMP 60578 rf. 2. oe ee eee @19.3
P. novaezealandiae
CM AV21355 holotype ............... 26.0 18,5 12.0
Archey, Tast,rie.. 3 seas teeters $2 26.9 (Scarlett 1966)
P. proavus from figures of holotype ..... >18.0-18.6 >14.8-15.2
P. conspicillatus;
SAM 18412 (holotype of validipes) rf. -. 26.1 17.9 11.0
RECENT
P. conspicillatus.... 2.0.0.2... 0....02.. 20 21-26 24 1.5 19 15-19 $17 1.4 19 9-12 11 0.8
PV CRISDUS cx fs iittaasgaece «awa sect vleleyee 1 25 9 18 1 11
Phonocrotatus -s 0.5 23:5 ¢eaassssteetas 3 24-30 27 3.3 3 17-22 20 2.5 3 11-16) =«13 2.3
P. erythrorhynchos.................... § 22-25. 23 0.9 5 12-18 15 3.2 5 10-11 10 0.6
Po philippensis oo... 3 thee ean bb bee es 1 25 1 19 1 12
Pr FAlPesCens- v0 fie iveicelecs ile ainee eeMee 2 19-24 2 14-18 2 9-12
P. occidentalis ..... 0.2.00. 02002254. 9 17-21 920 1.4 9 12-16 14 1.0 9 6-9 8 0.8
TABLE 3
Measurements in mm of trochlea III of tarsometatarsi of recent and Australasian fossil pelicans
Internal depth External depth Distal width
n range x” sd n range x sd n range x” sd
FOSSIL
P. tirarensis
SAM P13858 holotype ......-......0.. 11.3 11.2 9.4
TOMDPIOZ0S Te i fea cetacean 9.7 9.8 6.9
UCMP 60988 rf. oe ee >9.9 >10.3 @7.0
UCMP 113115 rf. ...,...--4.- pbrner he @10,0 9.9 6.4
P. cadimurka
SAM P22501 holotype ........-...,.... 9.2 9.6 >6.0
UCMP. 6057756. oss pec cie epee dy peenih >8.9 10.8 7.8
UCMP 60578 rf. 45 tt cele a dep dias 11.5 12.0 7.2
P. novaezealandiae
CM AV21355 holotype ......,.....-.. 14.8 15.2 10,0
P. proavus from figure of holotype -.. . - - >6.8
P. conspicillatus:
SAM 18412 (holotype of validipes) rf... . 15.0 15.3 10.1
QM F37S1 (lectotype of grandiceps) rf... 15.8 17.0 10.2
UCMP'56322). 0 tecaa etsy hesag tees nwt 15.3 10.1
RECENT
P. conspicillatus.......0.0...0225..2-.. 19 12-16 14 1.0 20 13,17 15 1.0 17 8.10 9 0.6
Py CPiSPUS T,. << exh SRS tt eile oo eb we 1 14 1 14 1 10
P. onocratalus . 2... eee eee 2 14-17 3 14-16 15 1.3 2 9-10
P. erythrorhynchos............2...2... 5 13-14 9 13 0.4 5 13-14 14 0.4 2 9
P. philippensis ... 0.0.0.6. 0.000 cue een 1 14 1 14 1 9.5
PL TUPESCENS i el Rael titer de ee 2 11-14 2 12-14 1 7-9
Ppecidenidalisy #& + 5.+) esr Sige 9 8-11 10 0.7 9 8-11 10 0.8 1 6
THE FOSSIL PELICANS OF AUSTRALASIA 247
TABLE 4
Measurements in mm of trochlea II and IV of tarsometatarsi of recent and Australasian fossil pelicans
External depth Anterior width Internal depth
of II of II of IV
n range x sd n range * sd n range x sd
FOSSIL
P. tirarensis
SAM P13858 holotype ........-....... 10.2 4.5
OM FIO703 TE... ee ees 9.1 4.0
P. cadimurka
UGMP 60879 TED ici lity paevacmoncoes 5.7 10.2
UCMP 60578 rf. 2... ec eee 10.6 5.5 11.2
P. novaezealandiae
CM AV21355 holotype ....,.......+-5 12.9 13.0
P. proavus from figure of holotype ...... >5.6
P. conspicillatus:
OM F3751 (lectotype of grandiceps) rf. . . >14.4
SAM 18412 (holotype of validipes) rf. .. . 13.5 7.8 14.0
UCMP 56322 rhe con + bie, cyereirt arian meets 13.9
RECENT
P. conspicillatus...... 2.02.4... ...00.. 20 «11-15 13 1,0 17 6-10 7 0.7 20 =: 12-15 13 0.9
PLCvispuss - boos ss toctss dar tts poneln 1 13 1 1 14
P. onocrotalus 2.0.6.0... eee 3 12-15 13 1.4 2 7-8 3 14-18 15 2.3
P. erythrorhynchos.... 02.0620... eee S 12-13 12 0.4 2 5 12-13 13 0.4
P. philippensis vccsa oc cecsa wees as eeiien ] 13 1 7 1 14
Ps FUPESEOHS oyu, ais inl lle le wooed bla as ohh sities 2 10-13 2 6-7 2 11-14
P occidentalis: ows. eeneyeerersseace 9 8-11 10 0.7 1 5 9 8-11 10 0.7
TABLE 5
Measurements in mm of distal end of femora of recent and Australasian fossil pelicans
Width across internal
Width of distal end and external condyles
n range x sd n range x sd
FOSSILS
P. novaezealandiae
CM AV21355 holotype 2.0.0.0 0 0.000 eee eee eee tees 36.2 28.4
SMA WIZAB2 Tf isi ig eta etch phe aA el be ected tote wert ct a elelhwre dacase bye >35 >28.3
Archey; Ost, rhs. .o cee pss ce Peas ELL La Baas t tae efeilise a army Efe 38 (Scarlett 1966)
P. conspicillatus:
SADE BES TSS TES ps sgeee et yihs bs pean elnfee oa! oleate so rh epajater et olfllsiess nals nah ad PE 3 an @29.0 24.4
RECENT
P. CONSPICH AIS: oye) sp o\ea tht nel odientigeea iene Bins sioeceid y39e $e 15 30-37 =. 332 2.2 15 24-29 26 1.7
PCHSPUS! cs cceg passe p ative es sid qwetttamee ds sadtt tee debra des 2 35-37 2 27-29
P.-QHOCTORTUS.”. i DGGG fe si ajetees tite lee olnegetece si pinaclane on dh Bales Tae ee 2 33-35 2 26-29
PSR ry T TOPPA AE CTO Se ote chan Peete ole fens alain tay ov sh iif so coe «play el ellie leant te jee me 9 28-33 31 1.9 9 24-27 825 0.9
P; piittopensisr. 25.755 cay e200 8 BARR e eae ABO Bate wtih 1 35 1 26
BoPRsesGeH®: sa-rcop een tele g dare eng gis 0 ns carly ln SET Ieee wgup “2 26-32 2 21-25
Pi otcidentalis neney ali aetocscesog i camels bee satan dalels exces. ole Ss 20-26 23 1.8 5 16-19 19 2.1
September, 1981
VT Ll 61-¢%T 866 va St LI-tl 6 ST Lt 6I-PL 66 ST 0 THT G voocue see hewseeee. gee | pte Bike a So - oe S1]DIUap1II0 “I
a bz [ 0z €Z I 8z PSG THe ecind ble ng espa meen pt pie alt baie fe eatn ee tes : suaasafna “y
Ww
a £0 €€ €¢-7C = § 90 6— 61-8 § s'0 T@ Cle + eT SG | LOE Ge Ge TTP NS ae tee PODS an a aes ON TES " -soyoudysosyshsa “g
a 9S SC L072 O7@ 1? pe0e €£ Lt pO St £ SE OG» CSCS C a ee a E O iar aah Gh Tog as = EES Sn]DIOLIOUO “J
20 9z I PZ I 67 Ei att an beeen. ee et ee ee ee Ee eee a ee ee oe a) sndsiuo ‘d
4 eT @ score SL st Of €2-9T ST TT I@ col SI eT OG Bp” GE Cet oe geese reat Go RRO e eS eS a * * snyoqpioidsuoa “g
=
, LNSOFea
B
4 r6I Loz< sataba Ui eedanebhilowine aketyetiee | raaeedsaae eyttydds “4 IzS09 dWOn
< Tect p77 , a a ee as yi €SLed NO
n snivyiaidsuod “g
S)
a Z'9z (996I ap1e98) sachs bbe Sa Sd ered tata t's oho eae ed beg etc Ae bh yas “JI ASO] ‘Koyory
372 661 6'0z sz shRERe aha oes sted aba ste saass seams OF ey ee ones iss “}1 ON OU “WIOF
362 VE tees JL'Sb8SA VW ANMV
O'"~ 9 6L O0'€7 PEECA em Waa Se Seka Wms Sh acct ws Heid SE We BA theo w= adAiofoy SSEIZAW WO
avipuvjpazavaou ‘gq
TISSOd
ps x osuei u ps x asues u ps x osuel ou ps x asues u
pua [eqsip aspliq jeurpus}zeidns sajApuos jo sajtApuosd jo
jo UIPIM jo pua yeurrxoid yidop jeuro1xy uidop jeussjuy
ye WyeYs JO YIPLA
suvolad [Issoj uerIse[eisny pue jUdd0I JO SNsIeIOIQN JO pUS [eISIPD JO WU UT sjuaWaINseap
9 HIGVL
248
249
THE FOSSIL PELICANS OF AUSTRALASIA
OL I 6 I LI i Le [Penn ett beeen ener e erences syjp1uap12900 “gq
Oc-9T =z clI-Or = 0c-6L c SE re Ne a TS a rag OY suaosafn
or 1 tT I SI I bb [eeepc eee eee eens sisuaddyryd ‘g
IZ61 oz ZVlL Z cZ0Z OZ oT soyoudysorysQua ‘g
SIZ oz eVzE Zz Se7z oz oe snjp10190U0 ‘¢
Iz 1 cI I zz I ss [otter tees tee eens retest ener sndsuo “g
et It €t-6r OL OT el vi-Il II LT EC. wStlZ> “EL Ly 9 IS) ny 6, 5) a Da sngoyioidsuoa “¢
INAOda
61D 3 9°ST Fa 7 ae “HZ8E€ZI dAON
DyANWUIPDI “_
6 ort i i A coh eR ae ll ja (Stuisnon] snuasks0avyauy jo adAquds) 67SS4 WO
snyoppiaidsuod “gq
ISSO
ps x asuel u ps x osuel u ps x osuel u ps x osuel u
saskudodeStiasod dauase setindodsakior fore quinse jo
SSOIOB YIPIA, jo 1otrajsod ssoioe YIPIAA Jolia}sod 0} sashydod
SSOIOB YIDIAA -e3Azoid wo yisusT
suvoled [Isso} uvise[eiismy PUP 1U990I1 JO dBIQOLISA [BOIAIOD YUNOJ JO WU UT sjUaWaINsesW
L ATadVvL
250 REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18(12): 235-264 September, 1981
TABLE 8
Measurements in mm of quadrates of recent and Australasian fossil pelicans
Height from Width across
mandibular to mandibular Width across
squamosal articulation articulation orbital process
n range x sd n range * sd n range x sd
FOSSIL
P. conspicillatus
OM F3749 rf. eet ee een 33.9 27.0
UICIMEP SOS 2042 os ecg order t ne he's doe @31.5 >23.3 >24.6
RECENT
P. conspiciliatus , ..07 70 e 84 o> de oe 92 11 28-36 32 2.3 11 22-27 26 1.9 11 24-30 8=6.28 2.1
PiGrispus’ oo gxscck ee aee yee ei 1 32 1 24 1 26
P. onocrotalus 2.0.0.0... 06 e eee 1 40 1 30 1 30
P. erythrorhynchos...............00445 1 29 1 23 1 24
P. philippensis :o0 emcee cs ga eceig pees es 1 33 1 24 1 27
Pr tUfescens= 06 ice cp cece red cau 2 29-33 2 20-25 2 22-26
P. occidentalis... 0.06... 1 32 1 20 1 19
TABLE 9
Measurements in mm of coracoids of recent and Australasian fossil pelicans
Width from
Width of shaft coracoidal fenestra to
at coracoidal medial margin of shaft
fenestra on posterior surface
n range x sd n range x sd
FOSSILS
P. conspicillatus:
ONGFS TSO The oo sens nies ig aatoote hey fl lg rersaas shite cibaoh Hotuchtch Maki degen hated abyha @19,4 8.4
OM RGG69 TE. cou. dit areca legs areal UUs gare w beat ate aie a gis: 17.4 7.0
P. novaezealandiae
CMA V2135S RORY BE: i. ato es eae eigen OF HT) GF aed orest glelee dagtd a alaty 16.8 9.7
CM AMESGRS TE) sy wetiyerreay Ss hp Hoey o RES A pedhe! aah Sete bebe elated oe opt ERI gk @17.5 8.7
RECENT
P, COnSPictllAtus sc cae cc cee aa Cova dbegg eenes sured be 13 14-19 16 1.7 13 6-9 7 1.0
Pr CHSDUS™ ot se ene SR SUR EES hece gee tovahy damlide praise tet erat sag LE 2 17-20 2 7-9
PY GROCTOTANS. ep ABE dep 4 ayy ne oot + alia ta tel td std te ssew ated d: 2 18-19 2 9
DP. \GPYARTOPRYNCHOS!-s 6%, ols, orod egg 408 || bAace Se As ee lt aa tin eed a dake 9 14-18 16 1.0 9 6-9 7 1.1
Py philippensis. sco 2° tbe ag othe bb rit 18S ee late es polelnlgg oe ee angi 2 18-19 2 8-9
Fis TUPOSCENS TG STE SELECTS DIAL LG Wile BARI dials ol be eu yyy gly 2 13-16 2 5-8
BP. OCCIMERTATIS (fo. cvieeg hay eae ee ty Beene eer ee s tale bs Pl eee ae 5 11-13 11 0.7 5 5-6 5 0.4
THE FOSSIL PELICANS OF AUSTRALASIA 251
TABLE 10
Measurements in mm of third cervical vertebrae of recent and Australasian fossil pelicans
Length of left
Width of anterior side of anterior
Width across articular surface articular surface
prezygapophyses of centrum of centrum
n range x sd n range x sd n range x sd
FOSSIL
P. conspicillatus
TEMP 56394 hg oe cece chee a cetalationss 24.9 16.1 9.8
RECENT
P. conspicillatus ... . - biypeeraayetszan @ 22-26 24 1.4 9 11-14 12 0.9 9 7-11 10 1.5
Bey CHESTS BS wasn ie a caste Shiiin fa abot & jedutena|§ l 23 1 12 1 11
P. onocrotalus ...,...-...---- srr93 2 23-26 2 11-12 2 10
P. erythrorhynchos...- . ceteteleit exeeame Pe 21-23 2 11-12 2 9-11
P. philippensis ............ a cnbe afeten 1 18 1 10 1 8
Prrufestens 2.0% :2¢ 0ti 2a rr uhispe 19-21 2 11-12 2 8-10
P. occidentalis 0.0.0.6... cece ens 1 16 1 9 1 6
TABLE 11
Measurements in mm of left prezygapophyses of third cervical vertebrae of recent and Australasian fossil pelicans
Length Width
n range x sd n range x sd
FOSSIL
P. conspicillatus
DICMP 36394 rE e seescach eld debate occice pais obebalobartoracere peolec’, giaeeazazece pb elefobels atid 11.5 6.3
RECENT
P: COMSPICHIAUS . 5... Be\o.s4.05 canny avery SMPTE TE Peer LE bee? Sista ee, OD 10-1412 1.3 9 5-7 6 0.5
Pi G7ISPUS) os pee ceases eid y phat aqupeee a pac galn ever aneewureait ti, 1 12 1 6
Py CUED oo oss eah YG Son ca tsh ow jaen chee df [acns eft fos tee] ote fe leone] 4 a fave oh Ohi ja wae 2 11 2 6-7
P erythirorWynchoss os\e<es 40-25 bg nesses PSE E esa yea PEED Bene eee 2 11 2 4-5
P. philippensis .-... 2) 6220 0..0225. Et lgeneretewre atoll ae arene acne thse da yet 1 9 1 5
Pmifeseiner are ten ee ot BOR eee eGR Sap s teem tie fob) otitel 2 9-10 2 5
Pu O06tdertAlls: vaqwce eo ot) ae lnjcty erent a teg As paves nla ide eed tect Mle bo pity wd 10 1 4
TABLE 12
Measurements in mm of sterna at coracoidal sulci of recent and Australasian fossil pelicans
Depths across right Depths across left
dorsal and ventral dorsal and ventral Minimum
lips at maximum lips at maximum distance between
expansion expansion sulci
n range x sd 0 range x sd n range x sd
FOSSIL
P. conspicillatus
UCMP 60656 rf. .....,.---5.----44--- 13.9 16.2 4.4
RECENT
P. conspicillatus . .... pesssacesssasaz: 10 13-18 16 1.4 10 «13-19 16 1.7 10 0-7 4.5 2,3
P. onocrotalus ......,. wae eee Ee. 21 1 19 1 10
P. erythrarhynchos. 2.000.066 0 0. 0c eee 5 9-16 12 3.0 4 8-16 12 3.9 5 4-11 7.5 2.7
P. philippensis 2.00.60. ees 1 18 1 17 1 9
P. rufescens ......... =: Lf ‘sescem a 16 1 17 i 6
P, occidentalis. js) icssi. qoccey vests el cnet 9 7-9 8 0.5 9 7-9 8 0.6 9 7-11 9 1.2
September, 1981
REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18(12): 235-264
252
L0 Il ZI-O1 L VT €I ST-Il 8 Sil Lt 6T-€l 8 (an 61 =O7-9T Bee cr eS ee Oe ep A oe S1]DJUap1gI0 "gq
SE-zt z 9T-ST z 97-81 z 7-07 Zeer suagsafns ‘g
s°0 €l 1-71 S a0) 9ST 9T-ST g +0 02 17-07 S 90 Co «ECT elie a ae SNe ata 2 soyoukysoiyi cua “gq
IZ-st z IZ-Lt z 2-72 z LE-EZ Zener snyp10s20U0 ‘g
or I 61 . PZ 92-$7 | sndsuo“g
9°0 €l i-?l ST 60 OT 8I-F1 SI rant O@ Ct-8I ST el €C = ST-1% sniwjpioidsuos ‘g
LNAOFY
Lvl 9°8T T'02 9° ET ‘#07809 dWOn.
70T T'@ ‘HW 8pe9s WON
snioyioidsuod “g
(Q96L NARS) SZ eee eee }1 so} ‘Kayary
gst SLT 1S oe a a a eee adMojoy SseIZAV WO
avipuvjpazavaou ‘g
TISSOd
ps x asuel u ps x suri u ps x osuel u ps x asuel u
a]Apuos jeuioqur a]Apuos [eulaixa jo ajApuos [eUulaixe pus [eisIp JO YIpPIM
jo yidag pus jeurxoid je jo ujdaq
weYs JO WPI
suvoled [Isso] uvisejelsny pue JUad01 JO oevU[N JO PUD [ISIP JO WW UT sjUsUdINsEa|
tl AIaVviL
iat
THE FOSSIL PELICANS OF AUSTRALASIA
a ee EEE EEEEEEEIEIEEIEEIIEIEIEEEIEIEE EISNER
St I L I IL I 91 Pn nner e nese ner n sees eens ssc ece ees sypruapi900 ‘g
61-91 z z PII Z Ph a Sr suaosafns “g
6I I Or I 91 I 61 [bbe e tense e ese eceree neers soyoucysomyihua “g
6t z ZI-0l 2 gI-ol z a A snjp10190U0 ‘g
zz I rl I LI I Sz PEE nnn nents e ernest cece e eee ees sndsuo ‘g
aa 8t Oz-9l ZI L0 6 01-8 (ai el val LI-CL GL 60 Cle OSLER ee ee ee mt snivypioidsuos “¢
INdOda
LI Z6 6'EI Pah a "416509 dO
Z°81 ZO1 CEI ay a 1 ¢€0509 dN
snivyiaidsuod ‘g
TIISSOA
ps 4 asuer u ps x osuel u ps x osuel u ps x osuel u
anscord douejnanie coakincas sednordseytsoiddo pue
ausoddo jo 1ys1aR Teujn jo yIplA Jeupn jo 1ystoyy uonepnonie reuyn
ssoioe YIpILA
suvorjed [Issoj ueiseyensny pue JusdeI JO SuTJOJIOUND JO WU UI s}UsWeINseo|j
bl AIAVL
254 REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18(12): 235-264 September, 1981
TABLE 15
Measurements in mm of proximal end of femora of recent and Australasian fossil pelicans
Width of proximal end Depth of head Depth of trochanter
n range x sd n range x sd n range x. sd
FOSSIL
P. novaezealandiae
CM AV21355 holotype ............... 35.4 15.1 5.0
Archey, lost, rf. ued piesa eae wes 36.0 (Scarlett 1966)
P. conspicillatus
UCMP 60477 rh. fics edi neeta yp testa ys 29.7 14.5 > 25.5
RECENT
P. conspicillatus.. 0.0.0 14 26-33-29 2.0 14 13-16 14 0.8 14 22-2724 1.5
PPCHISRUS (4-4 pcb oye ett taste e edt 2 31-34 2 15-16 2 25-26
P. onocrotalus .... 0... eee 1 30 1 15 1 24
P. erythrorhynchos.. 0.00... c ee eee 5 29 0.3 5 13-14 14 0.3 5 22-25 24 1.2
P. philippensis .. 06.000 ccc cee ee eee 1 32 1 15 1 23
P, rufescens ........ 0.6. 2 24-29 2 12-14 2 19-24
P. occidentalis ............ 00000 -05- ) 19-25 23 2.0 9 9-12 11 11 9 16-22 19 1.7
TABLE 16
Measurements in mm of distal end of humeri of recent and Australasian fossil pelicans
Length of Depth of Depth of
external condyle external condyle internal condyle
n range x sd n range x sd n range x sd
FOSSIL
P. novaezealandiae
CM AV21355 holotype .............-- 22.7 26.5 14.8
CM AV12264 rf. 2. eee >22 >27 @15
P. conspicillatus
UCMP 60640 rf. 0.0... eee 20.7 >21.1 13.1
RECENT
P. conspicillatus ... 2.22. 17 19-25 22 1.6 18 22.27 25 1.5 18 12-16 14 1,1
PS GVISPUR | Oj RP A coe attr peels 2 = 23-24 1 28 16
P. onocrotalus ...... 0... cece eee jf ae 23-28 2 24-30 2 15-17
P. erythrorhynchos..............2--.-. 5 20-22 21 0.6 5 24.26 24 1.2 5 14-15 15 0.2
PrTUpeseens: 29s pet tec des oly 3 rare cite 2 18-22 2 21-25 2 =12-15
P. occidentalis .......0...00.00 0240... 9 15-20 18 1.5 9 17-22 21 1.4 9 11-13 12 0.8
THE FOSSIL PELICANS OF AUSTRALASIA 255
TABLE 17
Measurements in mm of scapulae of recent and Australasian fossil pelicans
Width of shaft
Width across at distal end of
Total length glenoid facet glenoid facet
n range x sd n range x sd n range x sd
FOSSIL
P. novaezealandiae
CM AV21355 holotype ............... 23.7 14.7
P. conspicillatus
WEMP 56633 Th agstarias ptt teed Wein >101.8 @21.2 @13.8
RECENT
P. conspicillatus.......0......0.00004.. 9 114-140 126 9.2 il =20-25. 0-22 1.2 11 11-1714 1.3
Pe CHSPUS 8.2 ate pes EE bth oD 5. 1 134 1 24 16
Ponocrotalus, M45) S959 2327 AR ad 2 129-137 2 24-25 2 16-17
P. erythrorhynchos...........00..0000% 5 121-133 126 5.5 5 20-22-21 0.8 5 13-20 16 2.9
P. philippensis tes 2. cnt toi sade ceteae : 2 129-137 2 24-25 2 =16-17
Bi FULESCEMS 0 8, PUTMAN Bee toe ae 4 2 101-119 101 1 2 2 16
P. occidentalis ..........0....000004.. 10 81-103 97 6.5 8 14-18 16 1.3 10 8-13 11 LiF
September, 1981
REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18(12): 235-264
256
6z tI 69 IZZ [fet ttt en ae ee EE TUES ce ra rent nera cli nat es sypiuapi900 “gq
tr I ez I 68 I 0Sz [Etter trent ce tne n nese arse e ese nea e cesses suaosafni ‘g
letp 2 Iz Z 16% OZ Geeipe. Bo Deere ee cores SR Ee tating cea ee soyoucysouys hua “g
Shbp Z iz-0z. Zz lo-+6 2 QOT-EOZ ZTE ENE EEE ERNE EEE eter etnnent ener tenes snjp10120U0 “gq
Le OS 98-ch OC Lt 0 £eL1 07 cs 88 SsooL = I? oT TEGSe LSC RCE: tant eat eRe RY ae Nr a ee snyvp}ioidsuoo ‘gq
LINAOda
Lb SEZ S16 rt I Cc Tee CE ee he as adhojou sseIzA WO
avipuv]pazavaou ‘q
“ISSO
ps x osuel u ps x asuel u ps x asuel ou ps x asuel u
yskttesos o1e1yost te OBIYOST apie ORIQIIIOA “fost € Joajue
-Ol! Jo ysueT -Ot JO YIPIAA ouajueysoneidns Surpnjour ysusT
sueoted [Issoj uviseyensny pue jusde1 Jo eBioesuAS JO WIU Ul s}UDUTOINsBoy
8. ATaVL
THE FOSSIL PELICANS OF AUSTRALASIA 257
TABLE 19
Logo ratios of width: length of synsacra and of ilio-ischiatic foramina of recent and Australasian fossil pelicans
(cf. Table 18 and Northcote 1979)
Synsacrum Ilio-ischiatic foramen
n range x sd n range x sd
FOSSIL
P. novaezealandiae
CMA NV2I3S5 OILY Pe nF as deste kot a dle edad Sy, aches eM, eR 0.47 0.31
RECENT
P.("CONSPICiAtUS:..,0 eiPinis de 8 sob dk MIN cease tcgapecbsa, whe ae decal a weno ess 12 0.47-0.51 0.49 0.01 20 0.33-0.48 0.40 0.04
P SONOCTOLAIUS sped ros a dk BE ye Pete Sats BARES Se Nit ahs Me | Pela. H o® 2 0.44-0.45 2 0.32-0.35
PERYENTORNYNCHOS Mit niyoe She fewer ees eet TDs anne ae eka ets dM 2 0.42-0.43 2 0.29-0.34
Be TUSESCENS 21). Rose att OA es TR Be! eo OE ee ee iL 0.45 1 0.28
P? OCCIAENIGLIS en Th,.8: PO heats LE TR, Meld: 3. ea Pe haa A 1 0.42 1 0.31
258
REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18(12): 235-264
September, 1981
|
1000 Km
1)
Lake Eyre IN ahr
X 10, 9813
C2 7€
MA
||
@) 100 Km
FIG. 1. Map of localities where fossil pelicans were found in
Australasia. Map A: Pelecanus proavus, holotype (1); P.
novaezealandiae, holotype (4), referred (2, 3 and 5); Map B:
P. tirarensis, holotype (7), referred (6); P. cadimurka n. sp.
holotype (10), referred (8, 13); P. conspicillatus, referred (8,
9, 11-14).
THE FOSSIL PELICANS OF AUSTRALASIA
FIG. 2. Fossil pelicans of Australia. Pelecanus rf. cadimurka,
UCMP 123382, fourth cervical vertebra (A); Accipitridae,
UCMP 69587, proximal right humerus (B). P. rf.
conspicillatus, UCMP 60503, left cuneiform (C); UCMP
60549, right cuneiform (D); UCMP 60520, distal left ulna
fragment (E); P. validipes, holotype, SAM 18412, distal right
tarsometatarsus (F); P. grandiceps, lectotype, QM F3751,
distal left tarsometatarsus (G); P. tirarensis, holotype, SAM
P13858, distal right tarsometatarsus (H). See scale for size.
REC, 8. AUST, MUS. 18(12); 235-264
FIG, 3. Fossil pelicans of Australia. Pelecanus rf, conspicillatus,
UCMP 60656, anterior sternal fragment (A); UCMP 56394
anterior 3rd cervical vertebra (B); Archaeocycnus lacustris,
syntype, QM F5529, 4th cervical vertebra (C); rf. P.
conspicillatus, QM F3749, left quadrate fragment (D);:
UCMP 56321, left quadrate (E); UCMP 60640, distal left
humerus (F); UCMP 56633, right scapula (G); P. rf.
tirarensis, UCMP 113115, distal right tarsometatarsus (H);
UCMP 60988, distal right tarsometatarsus (I); P. rf.
conspicillatus, UCMP 56322, distal left tarsometatarsus (J);
P. rf. cadimurka, UCMP 60577, distal right tarsometatarsus
(K); UCMP 60578, distal right tarsometatarsus (L). See scale
for size.
September, 1981
THE FOSSIL PELICANS OF AUSTRALASIA
FIG. 4. Fossil pelicans of Australia. Pelecanus rf. conspicillatus,
UCMP 60477, proximal right femur, (A); QM F3752, distal
right femur, (B); QM FF3750, left coracoid fragment, (C);
UCMP 60521, distal right tibiotarsus, (D); QM F3753, distal
right tibiotarsus, (E). See scale for size.
262
Supratrochanteric width (mm)
98
$7
96
95
94
93
92
91
90
REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18(12): 235-264 September, 1981
*
P. onocrotalus i
anaes P. novaezealandiae
P. erythrerhynchos a
a
e
)
°
o
°
°
©
P. conspicillatus
220
230 240 250 260 270 280 290
Length of synsacrum (mm)
FIG. 5. Comparison of synsacral measurements of the large
species of Pelecanus.
THE FOSSIL PELICANS OF AUSTRALASIA 263
FIG. 6. Holotype of Pelecanus cadimurka, n. sp., SAM P22501,
distal left tarsometatarsus. A. Anterior view. B. Distal view.
264
Distal Width of Trochlea I (mm)
REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18(12): 235-264
September, 1981
12
ul P. novaezealandiae gat onocrotalus
‘P. validipes’
P cri wi
. Crispus ce P. grandiceps ’
sa ; A ®
10 P. philippensis ¥
o e
Se es
¢ .-t
: P. tirarensis ® oC re
O P. erythrorhynchos
e
8 e Je =P. conspicillatus
Xe <> ————- P. rufescens
! e
P. occidentalis
4
P. cadimurka
8 92 Oleh wy <8: te “Tbe -le- VF
External Depth of Trochlea II (mm)
18 19 20
FIG. 7. Comparison of distal tarsometatarsal measurements of
living and extinct species of Pelecanus.
ON SOME OVIPAROUS FILARIAL NEMATODES MAINLY FROM
AUSTRALIAN BIRDS
BY ODILE BAIN AND PATRICIA M. MAWSON
Summary
Three groups of filarial nematodes are represented in this collection.
1. Aproctinae
Four species are described: Pseudaprocta copemani n.sp from Petroica multicolor; Aprocta
boulengeri n.sp. from Strepera graculina; Aprocta bakeri n.sp. from Corvus orru; Lissonema sp.
from Ninox novaeseelandiae.
2. Dicheilonematinae
Serratospiculum guttatum (Schneider, 1866) from Falco longipennis and F. peregrinus, and S.
tendo (Nitzsch, 1819) from F. peregrinus are redescribed. S seurati n.sp. is described.
3. Diplotriaeninae
Three species are described: D. spratti n.sp. from Oreoica gutturalis, D. beveridgei n.sp. from
Corvus orru, and D. smithi n.sp. from Acanthogenys rufogularis. Additional morphology is
given for D. delta Johnston and Mawson, 1940 and D. falconis (Connal, 1912).
ON SOME OVIPAROUS FILARIAL NEMATODES MAINLY FROM AUSTRALIAN BIRDS”
by
ODILE BAIN* and PATRICIA M, MAWSON**
“Laboratoire de Zoologie-Vers, associé au CNRS, Muséum national d’ Histoire Naturelle, 43 rue
Cuvier, F 75231 Paris Cedex 05
**Department of Zoology, University of Adelaide, G.P.O, Box 498, Adelaide, South Australia
5001
ABSTRACT
BAIN, O,, and MAWSON, P. M. 1981, Some oviparous filarial
nematodes mainly rom Australian birds, Ree, S. Aust, Mus,
18(i3): 265-284.
Three groups of filarial nematodes are rep-
resented in this collection,
1. Aproctinae.
Four species are described: Psewdaprocia cope-
mant n.sp. from FPetroica multicolor: Aprecta
boulengeri n.sp. from Strepera graculina; Aprocta
bakeri n.sp. trom Corvus orru; Lissonema sp, from
Ninox novaeseelandiae.
Pseudaprocta is regarded as being closely linked
with the Seuratoidea.
The species assigned to Apracta are heterogene-
ous, falling into two distinct morphological groups,
one of which corresponds with the genus Lissonema,
which is therefore reinstated, Apracta spp, have a
short ovejector, small caudal papillae in males,
spicules generally subequal with fine distal
extremities, no deirids, small eggs (less than 55 «jm
long), short larvae (around 200 zm long) with short
tail bearing terminal spines. Lissonema spp. have a
long ovejector, at least one large caudal papilla in
male, spicules usually equal, with large blunt distal
extremities, deirids, large eggs (more than 65 1m
long), long larvae (more than 400 jm long) with
long unarmed tail, The genus Squamofilaria is
regarded as a synonym of Lissonema and its species
are shown to belong either to Lissonema or Aprocta.
Lissonema contains 20 spp. (19 n, comb.) and
Aprocta 17 spp. (2 n. comb). The host ranges of
these two yenera are completely different.
2. Dicheilonematinae.
Serratospiculum guttatum (Schneider, 1866) from
Falco longipennis and F. peregrinus, and S. tendo
(Nitesch, 1819) from F. peregrinus are redescribed.
S. seurati n.sp is described,
Serratospiculum, parasites of Falconidac, contains
a total of seven species. These species fall within two
groups depending on the spicule length. (1) Those
with short spicules are separated further, in that S.
turkestanicum Skrjabin, 1916, S. guttatum, S.
kwangsiensis Hsii, 1963, possess specific cuticular
orhamentations in the female; while S. chungi
Hoeppli et Hsii, 1929, S. seurafi n.sp. (= F.
allenuaia Rud,, 1819 sensu Seurat, 1915), S.
congolensis Vuylstecke 1957, are distinguished by
the morphology of the epaulettes and the right
spicule; (2) those with long spicules: S. rendo(=? S.
thoracis Tubangui, 1934; = ? S. lii Ezzat et Tadras,
1958).
3, Diplotriaeninae.
Three species are described: D. spretti nosp. tram
Oreoica gutturalis, D. beveridgei n.sp trom Corviis
orru, and D, smithi n.sp from Acanthogenys
rufogularis. Additional morphology is given for D.
delta Johnston and Mawson, 1940 and D. falconis
(Connal, 1912),
DEPOSITION OF TYPE MATERIAL
Holotypes and allotypes have been deposited in
the South Australian Museum, Adelaide; (SAM in
text); other material has been deposited as noted, in
the Muséum National d’Histoire Nuturelle, Paris
(MNHN) and in the Australian Helminthological
Collection (AHC) at present housed in the South
Australian Museum,
In the species described here, the female has been
designated as holotype, and the male as allotype,
This is because the family, genera and species of
filarial worms are more often identified by the
female than by the male.
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
I, Aproctoidea—Aproctinae
Genus Pseudaprocta Schikhobalova
The morphological characters of the genus
Pseudaprocta are closer to those of Seuratoidea
Ascaridida than of Spirurida (Chabaud, 1974);
mouth large and triangular, six external labial
papillae, situated on the same circle as the cephalic
papillae, oesophagus short and very thick, without
This study was carried out while working under a grant (to O,B,) from the World Health Organisation.
266
differentiation into two parts, spicules equal and
simple, and one pair of caudal papillae situated
laterally (8th pair).
It seems that Pseudaprocta, and possibly the
Aproctinae, evolved from the Seuratoidea.
Pseudaprocta copemani n.sp.
(Figs. 1, 2,)
Material examined
From Petroica multicolor Gmelin (Muscicapidae)
from Maggs Mt, Tasmania. Holotype &, allotype ¢
(SAM V2096, V2097), 12 and 1d (MNHN, Paris,
No. 201 HD); 22 and 3d (AHC 6277).
From Pachycephala pectoralis Latham (Mus-
cicapidae), from Heatherleigh, S. Aust.: 3 pieces of
@ (2 anterior, 1 posterior), 1d, 1 posterior end ¢.
(AHC 6282).
Description
Morphology is shown in Figures 1 and 2. The
specimens, except in one case, are surrounded with a
H
REC. 8. AUST. MUS. 18(13): 265-284
September, 1981
thin membrane detached from the rest of the cuticle
and forming a vesicle around the body, beginning at
the level of the oesophagus and ending at the level of
the tail.
In the female, the tail ends in a small rounded
knob (Fig. 1, I). In the male, the precloacal unpaired
papilla is particularly big (Fig. 2, B and C). The
spicule sheaths are thickened near the cloaca; these
thickenings apparently assume the role of a
gubernaculum (Fig. 2, E).
Measurements
Holotype 2: body length 16.5 mm, width 500 wm;
nerve ring, deirids and vulva at 160 um, 320 pm and
370 ~m from head; length of buccal capsule 25 .m;
length of oesophagus 585 jim; length of tail 320 wm.
Allotype d: length of body 8.9 mm; width 310
wm; nerve ring 160 wm from head; length of
oesophagus 520 ym; length of left spicule, right
spicule and tail respectively 640 4m, 600 pm, 190
oun
100 Um
150 Jum
Figure 1. Pseudaprocta copemani n.sp., female. A, anterior end,
ventral view; B, C, & D, head in apical, dorsal and ventral
views; E, larva; F & G, head of larva, from hook side and
opposite side; H & I, tail in lateral and ventral views; J, tip of
tail; K, transverse section of body. A, H, I, J, K, to scale
200 »m; B, C, D, to scale 100 pm; E, F, G, to scale 10 pm,
OVIPAROUS FILARIAL NEMATODES
E
=
2
2
Figure 2. Pseudaprocta copemani n.sp., male. A, anterior end,
lateral view; B & C, caudal region, lateral and ventral views;
D, region of deirid and excretory pore, lateral view; E, distal
extremities of spicules and gubernaculum, lateral view. A, B,
C, to scale 200 pm; D, E, to scale 100 um.
Paratype %: body length 18 mm; width 520 um;
nerve ring, deirids, excretory pore and vulva at 152
wm, 320 wm, 270 wm and 435 wm from head; buccal
capsule 25 um long; egg 52 pm X 42 pm; larva 480
um Xx 8um.
Another 3 from AHC6277: body length 9 mm
long, width 400 jm: nerve ring, deirids and
excretory pore 160 pm, 290 um and 230 um from
head; buccal capsule 22 um long; oesophagus 440
um long; length of left spicule, right spicule and tail
respectively 550, 575 and 200 pm.
Discussion
This material is distinguished by its longer spicules
from P. gubernaculum Schikhobalova, 1930
(Caucasia); P. decorata Li, 1933 (China); P. buckleyi
(Singh, 1949) and P. leiperi (Rasheed, 1960) (India),
and P. ungriai Chabaud et al., 1964 (Madagascar), in
which the spicules are about 400 pm long. It differs
from P. sichotealinensis Oshmarin & Belouss, 1951
from Eastern USSR (Sonin, 1966) and P. skrjabini
(Ali, 1956) from India, by the rather greater spacing,
longitudinally, of the papillae near the cloaca. P.
myzanthae Johnston & Mawson, 1940, from
Myzantha flavigula (Meliphagidae) from South
Australia, is known only by the female, the
measurements of which are very similar to those of
the present specimens with the exception of the body
length which is greater. It seems better to keep the
two species separate, in view of the difference in
hosts, and of the fact that Johnston & Mawson show
a slightly different arrangement of the cephalic
spines (Johnston & Mawson, 1940, fig. 14). We
therefore propose it as a new species, P. copemani,
in honour of our Australian colleague Bruce
Copeman.
The Genera Aprocta Linstow, Lissonema Linstow,
and Squamifilaria Schmerling
The genus Aprocta according to Anderson and
Bain (1976), is large and heterogenous. Some
authors (Boulenger, 1928; Sandground, 1933
etc . . .) had previously proposed to recognize two
genera, Aprocta Linstow, 1883 and Lissonema
Linstow, 1903, separated on the form of the head
(flat or with two lateral elevations), the oesophagus
(divided or not), the caudal papillae of the male (few
and small or large and numerous). As pointed out by
268
Anderson and Chabaud (1958) the two first at these
characters are of doubtful use, because there are
many species in which the division is not clear,
However, since theif work, further descriptions and
redescriptions have been made (Ezzat and Tadros,
1958; Rasheed, 1960; Diaz-Ungria, 1963; Chabaud
et al., 1964; Schmidt and Kuntz, 1970; Yoyotte,
1972; Quentin et al., 1976), so the morphology of the
group is better understood.
Tt appears that the structure of the ovejector ts of
importance, as this can be either of two distinct
types: it may be long (1500-5000 2m) often with the
middle part dilated to form a chamber (e.g, A.
travassosi Caballero, 1938) or very short (200-600
jam) and simple (e.g. A.turgida Stossich, 1902, in
Chabaud and Choquet, 1955), Examination of well
described species shows that the character “ovejec-
tor long" is found in species with large caudal
papillae, and the character ‘‘ovejector short"’ is
found in species with small papillae.
This division is borne out by other characters:
spicules equal or unequal, with tips wide or fine,
presence or absence of deirids, large or small eggs,
larvae with long smooth tails (Chabaud e7 al,, 1959)
or short spiny tails (Quentin er al., 1976).
The two groups represent Linstow’s two genera,
Aprocta and Lissonema, and Lissonema 1s now
reinstated. Aprocta Linstow, 1883: ovejector short;
caudal papillae small; spicules generally subequal
with distal extremity finely pointed; deirids absent:
eggs small (less than 55 yom long); larvae short
(about 200 xm), with short tail with terminal spines.
Type species; A.cylindrica Linstow, 1883 (redes-
cribed by Quentin et al., 1976) trom Passeriformes.
Other species sufficiently known to be allotted to
the genus, with the bird groups in which they occur,
are:
A. angolica (Vuylsteke, 1953); Passeriformes
A. caballerat Ybarra, 1948; Faleoniformes and
Passeriformes
A. cercomelae Sonin. 1966; Passeriformes
A. colaptidis Schuurmans-Stekhoven, 1952; Pas-
seriformes
A. crassa Railliet et Henry, 1910; Ralliformes
A. laevicutis (Sandground, 1933); Passeritormes
A. matronensis Railliet et Henry, 1910; Pas-
seriformes
A. narium Linstow, 1901; Falconitormes
A. ophthalmophaga Stossich, 1902; Palconiformes
A. orbitalis Linstow, 1901; Falconiformes
A. ptiloscelidis
Charadriiformes
Schuurmans-Stekhoven, 1952;
REC. & AUST. MUS. 18(13); 265-284
Seplember, [981
A. suidarikowi Sobolev, 1947*; Charadriiformes et
Ralliformes
A. textori Vuylsteke, 1953, Passeriformes
A, turgida Stossich, 1902 (redeseribed by
Chabaud et Choquet, 1955); Lariformes,
The species A. caudata Mendonca, 1961, of which
only the male is known, seems to belong to the
Splendidoblariinac.
Lissonema Linstaw, 1903: ovejector long; at least
one large caudal papilla (a single precloacal papilla,
0-4 pairs cloacal papillae); spicules generally equal,
with distal extemity wide and blunt; deirids present;
egps large (over 65 wm long), larvae large (over
400 jm long), tail long unarmed. Type species:
L, rotundata Linstow, 1903 (redescrihed by
Rasheed, 1960) parasitic in Cuculiformes.
Other species which are sufficiently known to be
allotted to the genus, listed with the bird groups in
which they occur, are:
L. brevicaudata (Chow, 1939) n.comb,
(Strigiformes).
L. calliderma (Schmidt et Kuntz, 1970) n-comb.
(Cucuhformes),
L. caprimulgi (Kazubski, 1958) n.comb. (Cap-
rimulgiformes)
L, casmetocephala (Yoyotte,
(Cuculiformes)
1972) n.comb.
L, ghesquieri (Ezzat et Tadros, 1958) n-comb-
(Caprimulgiformes).
(Diaz-Ungria,
L. golvani 1963) n.cemb.
(Piciformes)
L, lepidogrammi (Tubangui et Masilungan, 1937)
n.comb, (Cuculiformes.)
L.. noctuae (Spaul, 1927) n.comb., redescribed by
Chabaud (1951) (Strigifarmes),
L. nyctidromi (Caballero et Peregrina, 1938)
o.comb (Caprimulgiformes).
L, obtusa (Dujardin, 1845) n,comb. (= Eucamp-
tus obtusus D,, 1845, Rucampius Cheyr., 1833
preoccupied, Coleoptera) (Caprimulgiformes).
L, papillosa (Chabaud, Anderson et Brygoo,
1959) n.comb, (Cuculiformes),
L proctata (Lent et Freitas, 1948) n.camb.
(Strigiformes).
L. semenovi (Skrjabin, 1934) n,comb. (Caprimul-
giformes),
*A_ sudarikawi Sobolev, 1947 (in Sonin, 1966) is hard ta
classify: according to this author, the spicules are pointed and the
eggs small asin Aprocta spp., bui the caudal papillae are large as
in Lissonema spp. The ovejector cannot be analysed, However,
Sandground (1933) describing analogous material, emphasised
the absence of caudal papillae. IL seems to us thal (his species
belongs to Aprocta.
OVIPAROUS FILARIAL NEMATODES
L, spasskyi (Sonin, 1966) n.comb.
(Cuculiformes),
L. travassosi (Caballero, 1938) n,comb,
(Tragoniformes).
The genus Squamofilaria Schmerling, 1925, which
was reinstated by Anderson and Chabaud (1958) for
Aproctinae with a short well sclerotized buccal
capsule, is itself heterogenous. In these species, the
buccal capsule appears to be a secondary cuticular-
isation of the wall of the buccal cavity, as in
Lissonema sp., described below from Ninox
novaeseelandiae. It is poorly limited externally, as
compared with the true buccal capsule seen in
Dipetalonema spp., Litomosa spp., etc. which are
descended from forms with a buccal capsule formed
from rhabdions.
The species attributed to Squamofilaria fall into
the same two morphological groups found in
Aprocta and Lissonema, and can be allotted to one
or other of these genera as follows:
(a) Aprocta
A, vestibulata (Johnston et Mawson, 1950)
n.comb. (Passeriformes).
A. pillersi (Yorke et Maplestone, 1926)
n.comb, (Passeriformes).
(b) Lissonema
L. coraciae (Gmelin, 1790) n.comb. syn.
Squamofilaria coraciae (Gmelin, 1870), This
is the type species of Squamofilaria which
now falls as a synonym of Lissonema
(Coraciadiformes).
L. sicki (Strachan,
(Strigiformes).
L. nepalensis (Soota et Chaturverdi, 1970)
n.comb. (Coraciadiformes),
L. ungriai (Guerrero,
(Trogoniformes).
1957) n.comb.
1971)* n.comb.
It appears that the host ranges for Lissonema and
Aprocta are mutually exclusive.
Lissonema spp. are known from the Strigiformes,
the Cuculiformest, the Piciformes (Bucconidae), the
Trogoniformes, the Caprimulgiformes and the
Coraciadiformes. [t a5 of interest to note that
Berlioz, in his Classification of Birds, treated these
six groups consecutively (pages 930 to 974, in
Grassé, 1950).
Aprocta spp. are known from the Lariformes, the
Charadriiformes, the Ralliformes (Burrhinidae and
* The eggs measure only 45m x 25 ym, but their concave form
jncheates thar they are not embryonated,
* Among species from Cuculiformes, thoxe from Centropus ure
unusual in having a Jang oesophagus (5-7 mm), clearly divided,
69
Otididae), the Falconiformes (similarly grouped by
Berlioz, p, 884-929), and the vast group of
Passeriformes.
The Australian species which have been studied
herein are assigned to the two genera Aprocta and
Lissonema.
Aprocta boulengeri n-sp.
(Figs. 3, 4)
Material
Strepera graculina Shaw (Cracticidae) from
Warwick, Qd., from head and nasal cavities.
holotype @, allotype d (SAM V2098 and V2099)
and 1] entire 2 and 2 broken 6 (AHC 5839),
Morphology
The morphology is shown in Figures 3 and 4,
Unpaired portion of ovejector short and simple.
Dimensions
Holotype 2: length 50 pm; width 920 pm:
cephalic papillae form area 110 «xm (laterally) by
70 ~m = (dorsoventrally); nerve ring and vulva
respectively 175 gm and 940 jm from head;
oesophagus 1060 sm long, with muscular part 215
1m long; tail length 385 ym, egg 58 pm by 32 pum.
Allotype d; length 25.6 mm, diameter 600 pn,
cephalic papillae area 110 jm x 55 jam; buccal
capsule 20 44m long; nerve ring and excretory pore
205 pm and 305 pm from head; oesophagus 800 pm
long with muscular part 190 jzm; tail length 320 em;
right and left spicules 400 im and 440 pm long,
22 pm wide.
Other entire female: body length 37 mm, diameter
910 wm; cephalic papillae on area 88 jum x 57 jum:
buccal capsule 38 jum long; nerve ring, excretory
pore and vulva respectively 220 pm, 310 jm and 680
yum from head; oesophagus 965 ym long, with
muscular part 200 «m; unpaired part of ovejector
600 xm long; tail length 240 jum; larvae 190 and 205
um long, 11 pm wide.
Discussion
This species is easily differentiated by the
following characters: presence of a median subtermi-
nal papilla on the male tail, spicules 400-440 jum in
length, with tricuspid distal extremities, vulva
slightly in front of the oesophago-intestinal junction,
anus of the female not terminal. This is proposed as
a new species A. houlengeri-
Aprocta bakeri n.sp.
(Fig. 5)
Material
Corvus orrt Bonaparte (Carvidae) from Emu
Vale, near Warwick, Od,, from nasal cavity:
holotype & (SAM ¥Y21000).
270 REC. 5. AUST. MUS. 18(13): 265-284 September, 1981
Figure 3. Aprocta boulengeri n.sp., female, and male allotype. A, anterior end of female,
lateral view; B, C, & D, head of female, in apical, lateral and dorsal views; E, F, head of
male, ventral and lateral views; G, anterior end of male, lateral view; H, I, tail of female,
lateral and ventral views; J, K, L, tail of male, lateral and ventral views; M, left spicule.
A, G, H, I, J, L, to scale 200 zm; B, C, D, E, F, K, to scale 100 wm; M, to scale 150 um.
ANY
Figure 4. Aprocta boulengeri n.sp. (cont.) A, and B, tips of left and right spicules, ventral
views; C, larva; D, E, head of larvae, with hooks seen in profile and full face; F, tip of tail
of larva, A-E, to scale 10 um; F, free-hand.
OVIPAROUS FILARIAL NEMATODES 271
Description
Morphology is shown in Figure 5. Triangular
buccal cavity. Cloaca opening on conspicuous
protuberance.
Dimensions
Body length 29 mm, diameter 550 4m; buccal
capsule 40 xm long; nerve ring 140 jm from head;
left and right spicules respectively 390 um and
330 ym long; tail length 260 um.
Discussion
The bifid extremity of the testis in these specimens
resembles that of Aprocta laevicutis from Cyornis
banyumas whitei but is distinguished from this
species by the larger body size and by the spicule
length (390 and 330 j1m instead of 210-170 um). It is
also distinguished from all other Aprocta spp. by a
500 Um
200 Um
voluminous protuberance bearing the cloacal open-
ing. It is proposed as a new species, A. bakeri,
dedicated to our Canadian colleague, Michael
Baker.
Lissonema sp.
(Fig. 6)
Material
From Ninox novaeseelandiae Gmelin (Strigidae)
from Berrimah, N.T., 12 (AHC 6261).
Description
The morphology is shown in Fig, 6. Mouth and
buccal capsule narrower dorso-ventrally than later-
ally; buccal capsule stoutly built, of two parts—an-
teriorly, a thickening of the cephalic cuticle,
Figure 5, Aprocta bakeri n.sp,, holotype male, A, anterior end;
B, oesophageal region, lateral view; C, D, head in dorso-
ventral and lateral views; E, F, tail, in lateral and subventral
views; G, H, right and left spicules, ventral views; I, J, distal
extremities of same spicules; A, to scale 500 um; B, E, F, to
scale 200 xm; C, D, to scale 100 4m; G, H, to scale 150 wm;
I, J, to scale 10 pm. v, vulva.
272
posteriorly, a pre-oesophageal thickening, poorly
defined externally, and thicker laterally. Base of
buccal cavity formed by the three prominent and
sclerotised oesophageal lobes. The cuticular ‘scales’
are irregularly distributed over the body length, but
the lateral fields are smooth. Unpaired portion of
ovejector long and complex (Fig. 6 J).
Measurements
Body length 34 mm, diameter 590 ym; buccal
cavity 22 ym long; nerve ring, excretory pore and
deirids at 155 ym, 242 4m and 270 pm from head;
oesophagus 1200 wm long, with muscular part 230
wm long; vulva 700 pm from head; unpaired part of
ovejector 4660 um long; tail length 95 xm; cuticular
REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18(13): 265-284
September, 1981
scales on body 22 pm long, 13 pm wide,
commencing at 1150 xm from head and ending 550
um from posterior end of body. Eggs 66 pm x 38
um; larva 415 jm long, 13.5 xm in diameter.
Discussion
Among the species of this genus in which there is a
buccal capsule, L, sicki, L. nepalensis, L. ungriai and
L. coraciae—only the last named agrees with the
Australian specimens in having ‘scales’ on the body,
but the shape and arrangement of these was not
exactly described. The dimensions of the female are
very close, except the length, which is only half that
of the Australian specimens. In view of this, and of
the different geographical range, no_ specific
identification is made.
Figure 6. Lissonema sp,, female. A, oesophageal region, lateral
view; B, anterior end, median view; C, D, head, lateral and
median views; E, cuticular ornamentation in region of mid-
body, in submedian view; F, deirid, lateral view; G, cuticular
scale in lateral view; H, I, tail, ventral and lateral views, J,
ovejector, distal part; K, larva; L, head of larva; A, B, E, H,
I, to scale 200 um; C, D, F, G, K, to scale 100 ym; J, to
scale, 500 pm; L, to scale 50 pm.
OVIPAROUS FILARIAL NEMATODES 273
IT. Diplotriaenoidea—Dicheilonematinae
Genus Serratospiculum Skrjabin
The genus Serratospiculum contains (a) species
with small spicules (left spicules 600-700 jun, mght
spicule 300-350 ym), which may be considered as
gtouped about S. guttatum and (h) species with large
spicules (left spicule 1100-1300 jim, right spicule
350-500 jm) grouped about S. tendo.
(a) Species with small spicules
S, guttatum (Schneider, 1866): the most character-
istic feature of this species is the cuticular
ornamentation of the female body, in the form of
large bosses, well described by Schneider. The
species is recorded in Australia from Falco berigora
by Schneider, 1866, from F. longipennis and
F. peregrinus (Syn. F. melanogenys) by Johnston &
Mawson, 1941, and in the present paper.
Species grouped with S$. guttatum may have (i)
smooth or (ji) ornamented cuticle,
(i) With smooth cuticle:
S. chungi Hoeppli & Héu, 1929, from Falco sp,,
China.
S. congolensis Vuylsteke, 1957, from Butastur
rufipennis (Sund.) from equatorial Africa*, This
species is distinguished from S. chungi by the
structure of the right spicule; the oblique crests are
present on the distal third of the spicule, not on the
distal half,
S, seurati n.sp. (syn. Filaria attenuata Rud,, 1819
sensu Seurat, 1915) from variaus Falconidae, from
North Africa, is close to S. chiungi but can be
distinguished by the cephalic structure—the epau-
lettes concave with regard to the dorso-ventral axis,
and not rectilinear (Fig. 18 of Hoeppli & H&u, 1929),
relatively narrower—(30 zm wide by 100 wm long in
S. seurati, 50 wm wide by 120 jzm long in S. chungi).
(ii) With cuticular ornamentation:
S. turkestanicum Skrjabin, 1916 (type species of
the genus), trom F. tinnunculus L, from Central
Asia, is well distinguished by the type of cuticular
ornamentation, consisting of points curved back-
wards,
S, kwangsiensis H8u, 1963, from F. columbarius
insignis (Clark) from China, is close to S. guttatum in
the structure of the head and the presence of
rounded bosses on the cuticle of the female, but
these bosses continue to the level of the anus in this
* The apical view shown in Fig. 36 appears ro be in error: the
piece of the head shown is probably seen upside dawn, from (he
posterior aspect.
| Ruilliet & Henry (1916) have resolved clearly the question of
the nomenclature of this species.
Species but only to 1 rom from the posterior
extremity in 8. guttatum; also, the distal half of rhe
spicule is particularly delicate.
The tilanal worms described by Li (1933) from
F. columbarius (syn, Hypotriorchis aesolon), from
China, as S. turkestanicum seems from the character
of the female cuticle, to be S. kwangsiensis.
(6) Species with large spicules
This group contains three species, all without
cuticular ornamentation in the female!
S. tenda Nitasch, 18197, the species is parasitic in
F. peregrinus in Europe (Nitzsch in Rudolphi, 1819;
Dujardin, 1845; Yorke & Maplestone, 1926) and in
Australia (material described here and, as pointed
out by Sonin (1968), some parts of the material seen
by Johnston & Mawson, 1941, and noted as
S. guttatum). The species is also found in other
falcons, and in other parts of the Old World.
S, thoracis Tubangui, 1934, from Falco ernesti in
the Philippines; the dimensions of this species are
similar to those of \S. tendo.
S. lii Ezzat & Tadros, 1958, from F. peregrinus
callidus fram Belgian Congo. In this species the
measurements resemble those of the two preceding
species. The area rugosa and the detailed structure
of the spicules have not been described, and as
pointed out by Sonin (1968), it is possible that these
three species are synonymous.
(t appears that there are more species of
Serratospiculum than allowed by Sonin (1968). It
also appears that S. guttatum is found only in
Australia, and that references to its presence in
other parts of the world are erroneous.
The Australian material from falcons (Faleonidae)
permits the redescription of two species, Serraro-
spiculum guttatum (Schneider, 1866) and S. tendo
(Nitzsch, 1819). Comparison of the Australian
material with specimens in MNHN has led to the
identification of a new species, 8, seurati.
Serratospiculum guttatum (Schneider, 1866)
(Fig. 7)
Material
From Falco longipennis Swainson, from Fleurieu
Peninsula and Yorke Peninsula, South Australia.
93, 5 anterior and 2 posterior ends of ¢, 72,4
anterior and 5 posterior ends ? (AHC 6279); 2¢
and 22 (MNHN, 193 HD).
From Falco peregrinus Tunstall, from Mallala,
S.A, 3d, 1 posteriar end ¢, (AHC 6280).
Description
The morphology is shown in Fig. 7. The shape of
the head is the same in all specimens, , . broader on
lateral axis, epaulettes twice as long as wide (80 pm
274
REC. S. AUST. MUS, 18(13): 265-284
September, 1981
Figure 7. Serratospiculum guttatum A-G, female H-N male, A,
anterior end, lateral view; B, cuticular ornamentation in mid-
body, lateral yiew; C, the same, detail of one boss; D, distal
end of ovejector; E, F, tail, in lateral and ventral view; G,
head, apical view; H, anterior end, ventral view; I, head,
median view; J, K, left and right spicules; L, area rugosa,
ventral view; M, the same, in detail; N, tail, ventral view; A,
scale 500 pm; B, D, H, to seale 200 pm; C, E, F, to scale
150 pm; G, I, L, M, N, to scale 75 wm,
by 40 4m) and in apical view, convex with regard to
the dorso-ventral axis. Cuticular ornamentation
present only in the female. Area rugosa forms two
latero-ventral bands of low cuticular protuberances.
Dimensions
Three females: length 127, 150 and 140 .m, width
700, 790, and 600 um; nerve ring at 175, 180, and
240 rm from head; excretory pore at 205, ?, and 240
uum from head; deirids at 250, 220, and 510 .m from
head; muscular oesophagus 420 xm long, and with
glandular part 13 mm long (measured on one of the
females dissected); vulva at 740, 600, and 1050 4m
from head; Iength of unpaired part of ovejector 2150
pm (in female dissected); tail 90-110 um long;
embryonated eggs 52 by 30 um; cuticular ornamen-
tation starts at 3 mm from the head and ends at 1 mm
from the posterior end.
Two males: length 72 and 93 mm, width 480, 560
p.m; nerve ring and excretory pore 150, 230 44m from
head (measured on one male); deirids at 280 and 340
wm, 212 and 275 «ym from head; muscular
oesophagus 320, 365 wm long, length of glandular
OVIPAROUS FILARIAL NEMATODES 275
oesophagus not determined; tail length 80, 82 wm; This material has been compared with MNHN 510
length of left spicules 650, 670 wm, of right spicules JJ collected in France from the same host species;
350, 360 um; area rugosa lying from 5.4 mm to 450 ‘this consists of one anterior end and two posterior
pm from the posterior end (measured on one male). ends of d and the anterior and posterior ends of 12.
Serratospiculum tendo (Nitzsch, 1819) Description
(Fig. 8) The morphology of the two lots of material is
similar, and is shown in Figure 8. The cephalic
From Falco peregrinus Tunstall, from Port structure is constant: rounded head, epaulette 3-4
Augusta, S.A. 12, 1d (AHC 6273). times as long as wide (110 «4m by 30 ym), concave
Material
Figure 8. Serratospiculum tendo. A, anterior end of female, lateral
view; B, anterior end of male, median view; C, head of
female, apical view; D, E, head of male, median and lateral
views; F, male, area rugosa, ventral view, G, H, female, tail,
ventral and lateral views; I, J, tail of male, ventral and lateral
views; F and J, Australian material, other figures French
material. A, B, G, J, to scale 200 pm; C, D, E, F, I, to scale
100 wm; H, to scale 500 pm.
276
with regard to the dorso-ventral axis, and prolonged
by 4 small additional swellings. Area rugosa in form
of two ventro-lateral bands of small longitudinal
cuticular wrinkles. Spicules not drawn, as studied by
Bain & Vassiliades (1969).
Measurements of Australian specimens
Female: length of body 190 mm, width 825 pm;
nerve ring and deirids 300 wm and 210-220 wm from
head; length of oesophagus 19.7 mm, of muscular
part 600 wm; vulva 1650 wm from head; tail 100 ~m
long.
Male: length of body 148 mm, width 410 um;
nerve ring and deirids 200 4m and 305-310 um from
head; length of oesophagus 11 mm, of muscular part
600 um; length of left spicule 1120 um, of right 505
pm; tail 130 wm long; area rugosa extends from 4650
ym-600 wm from the caudal extremity.
REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18(13): 265-284
September, 1981
Measurements of specimens from France
In female, vulva 1 mm from the head, tail 140 pm
long. In male nerve ring and deirids 165 4m and 230
ym from head; length of left spicule 1150 4m, and
1120 wm, of right spicules 510 wm and 500 wm; tail
145 and 110 pm.
Serratospiculum seurati n.sp.
(Fig. 9)
Syn. Filaria attenuatum Rudolphi,
Seurat, 1915.
1819 sensu
Material
Specimens studied by Seurat, 1915, and deter-
mined as ‘Filaria attenuata Rud., 1819 (= F.
guttatum Schneider, 1866)’. This material, now in
the MNHN, Paris, was taken from Falco biarmicus
erlangeri Kleinschm at Biskra, North Africa; it
comprises 23 of which one is in two pieces, 1
Figure 9. Serratospiculum seurati n.sp. A, anterior end of female,
lateral view; B, head of holotype female, lateral view; C,
head of female, apical view; D, E, tail of holotype female,
ventral and lateral views; F, tail of male, subventral view; G,
H, left and right spicules, lateral view. A, E, to scale 200 um;
B, C, D, F, H, to scale 100 pm; G, to scale 50 pm.
OVIPAROUS FILARIAL NEMATODES 277
anterior end ¢, 2° and 2 posterior ends @, 1 entire
2 and 1 entire ¢ were chosen as holotype and
allotype respectively (MNHWN 110 EJ).
(2) specimens collected by Dollfus (MNHN 114
A) in 1914 from Falco sp., from Rabat, Morocco,
labelled S. guttatum (Schneider, 1866); consisting af
numerous pieces including 2 anterior and 4 posterior
ends of 2, 3 anterior and [ posterior ends ¢.
Morphology
The general morphology, well described by
Seurat, is complemented by Figure 8, The structure
of the head, in both lots of material, is similar, The
position of the vulva is somewhat variable (450-1000
wm from head). An area rugosa appears ta be
absent, The right spicule bears low crests, obliquely
placed.
Measurements
Holotype ¢: length of body 135 mm, width 770
jun; vulva 470 ym from head; tail length 40 pm.
Specimen not sufficiently clear for other measure-
ments,
Allotype ¢: length of bady 42mm, width 480 zm;
nerve ring and deirids 130 pm and 230 wm from
head; length of oesophagus 10 mm, of its muscular
part 271) pm; left spicule and right spicules
respectively 775 jum and 300 jum; tail length 110 wm.
From MNHN 114 A (2 pieces): length unknown;
width 500 wm; nerve ring 170 wm from head;
muscular oesophagus 310 ym) left and right spicules
respectively 650 zm and 350 jvm, tail length 110 pm,
Diplotriaenoidea:. Diplotriaenaidae
Diplotriaena spratti n.sp.
(Fig, 10)
Material
From Oreoica gutturalis Vigors & MHorsfield
(Muscicapidae) from the Petermann Ranges, N.T.
Holotype ¥ and allotype ¢ (SAM, V2101 and
V2102 respectively); 62, 9¢, and numerous pieces
of ends of ? and 1 posterior end 3 (AHC 6272); 19
and 23 paratypes (MNHN, Paris, 204 HD).
Description
Morphological features are shown in Figure 10.
Measurements
Holotype @: length of body 68 mm, width 700
jum; nerve ring 240 jzm from head; tridents 150 4m
and 172 «.m long; length of oesophagus 3720 wm, of
muscular part 370 pm; vulva 500 pm from head,
unpaired portion of ovejector 3300 «2m long; tail
length 110 p.m; eggs, non-fertilized, 32 pm by
18 wm,
Paratype 2s; body length 66-71 mm; in ? length
66 mm, width 500 jam; nerve ring and vulva 290 em
and 425 wm from head; trident 135 2m; oesophagus
4500 um; eggs 45 wm by 35 bm.
Allotype 3: body length 32 mm, width 400 jxm;
nerve ring 200 xm from head; muscular oesophagus
3850 jm long; tail SO pm; left and right spicules
respectively 4500 and 600 jcm long.
Paratype ds: length of body 32-34 mm; of
oesophagus 2600-3275 jzm; left spicule 4200-6300
pm, right spicule SLO-600 pm; in one male 32 mm
long: body width 455 wm, nerve ring 230 jm from
head; tridents 125 sm; length of oesophagus 3400
pm, of tail 55 ums left spicule 4200 pm long, with
calamus 650 jm, right spicule 550 jm.
Discussion
This species can be compared with the others of
the genus in which the left spicule is longer than 2000
pm. These are: D. bharioensis (Parona, 1889)*
redescribed by Anderson (1959) trom Sturnidae and
Turdidae in Asia, has the trident not pointed bur
concave at the apex, a much longer oesophagus (8-
12 mm instead of 2.6-6.3 mm), left spicule not
exceeding 2600 jzm, and the right spicule spiralled
about a strongly curved axis, whereas in the
Australian specimens the axis is almost straight.
In D. ecaudata (Oerley, 1882), from Sturnidae in
Africa the trident is concave at the tip, the left
spicule is not longer than 2800 jm, and the axis of
the right spicule has three strong bends.
D. tricuspis (Fedtschenko, 1874) sensu Singh,
1949, is, as pointed out by Anderson (1959), a
mistaken determination. It is clear from Singh's
paper that though the female is a Diplotriaena sp.,
the male (Fig. 27) is a Hamatospiculum sp. The
Australian species is proposed as D. spratti n.sp.,
named after our colleague David Spratt. The species
is characterised by the pointed apex of the trident,
the long left spicule (over 4000 wm) and the right
spicule spiralled around an almost straight axis.
* B. buckleyi Fotedar & Kaw, 1965, and D, mirzapurensis
Seota & Chaturvedi, 1967, both parasites of Acridotheres tristis,
have no morphological difference from [. bhamoaensis, and are
regarded as synonyms of this species.
278 REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18(13): 265-284
September, 1981
Figure 10. Diplotriaena spratti n.sp. A, anterior end of holotype
female, lateral view; B, head of holotype female, median
view; C, junction of oesophagus and intestine, paratype
female; D, E, tail of paratype female, lateral and ventral
views; F, trident of holotype female; G, to Q, male: G,
anterior end, ventral view; H, head, apical view; I, J, tridents
of two specimens; K, posterior end, lateral view; L, M, the
two extremities of the left spicule; N, right spicule and part of
the left spicule; O, distal end of right spicule, ventral view: P,
Q, tail in lateral and ventral views. A, D, to scale 500 p.m; B,
to scale 150 pm; C, E, G, L, N, to scale 200 pm; F, I, J, M,
O, P, Q, to scale 100 pm.
Diplotriaena beveridgei n.sp.
(Fig. 11)
Material
From Corvus orru Bonaparte (Corvidae) from
Emu Vale, near Warwick Qd: Holotype ° (SAM V
2103) and posterior end (10 mm) of allotype 3
(SAM V 2104); 29, 2 anterior and 3 posterior ends
2 (AHC 6276).
Description
Morphological features are shown in Figure 11.
Measurements
Holotype ?: body length 102 mm, width 1400 zm,
nerve ring 450 4m from head; trident 285 wm long;
oesophagus 9500 ym long, its muscular part 575 um;
vulva 630 zm from head; eggs 50 x 35 wm; tail 200
um long.
Allotype d: the piece is 1.11 mm wide; tail 10 um
long; left spicule 1355 zm long (calamus 250 p.m);
right 1075 «wm.
Paratypes: one anterior end of 2, 1400 ym wide,
with nerve ring 390 ym from head, tridents 250 4m
OVIPAROUS FILARIAL NEMATODES
200 Foal
279
150 jm
100 [Lm
Figure 11. Diplotriaena beveridgei n.sp. A-H, female; I-L, male,
A, anterior end, lateral view; B, oesophago-intestinal
junction; C, head, apical view; D, head, lateral view; E, F,
trident and its apex; G, H, tail, ventral and lateral views; I,
posterior end, ventral view; J, K, right and left spicules; L,
tail, ventral view. A, B, G, H, to scale 500 jm; C, to scale
150 um; D, E, J, K, to scale 200 jum; F, L, to scale 100 um; I,
to scale 1000 ym,
and 270 wm; oesophagus 8950 jm with muscular
part 580 um; vulva 650 um from head, unpaired
ovejector 2900 xm. One posterior end with tail 200
wm. Length of entire female 81 mm.
Discussion
The specimens differ from the other two
Diplotriaena spp. from Australian Corvidae as
follows:
In D. alpha Johnston & Mawson, 1940, the trident
is smaller (120 ym instead of 250-285 um) and
oesophagus twice as long.
In D. beta Johnston & Mawson, 1940, considered
by Anderson (1959) as a synonym of D. flabellata
(Linstow, 1888) the oesophagus is very long, but the
tridents shorter (190-200 1m), more massive, and
with rounded apex, and the right spicule is a
different shape.
280
The right spicule is bent in an ‘L' similar to that of
D. delirae Pinto & Noronha, 1970, from Tyrannidae
in Brazil, however our material is distinguished from
this species by the Janger oesophagus, and the longer
right spicule (1075 jm instead of 610 pm),
This material is therefore proposed as D, bev-
eridgei n.sp., named after the callector, Dr Jan
Beveridge. It is characterised by the large tridents,
the long oesophagus (about 9 mm) and the ‘L’ shape
of the right spicule.
Diplotriaena smithi o.sp.
(Fig. 12)
Material
5 collections from Acanthogenys rufogularis
Gould. From The Bunkers, S. Aust.: 4 birds, as
tollows;
1. holotype 2 (SAM V2105), allotype ¢ (SAM
V2106)
22, 1d, pieces of 2 and & (AHC 6278)
12, 1d, posterior end 1d (MNHAN, Paris 208
HD)
2.12, 1¢ pieces of 2 (AHC 6270)
3. 12%, pieces of and d (AHC 6268)
4. 42, 3d pieces of 2 [AHO 6267)
From Wubin, W. Aust.: 62, 3d (AHC 6264); 3°,
2d (MNHN, 208 HD).
Description
Morphological details are shown in Figure 12.
Dimensions
Holotype 2: body length 50 mm, width 680 ym;
trident length 220 4m; nerve ring and vulva 350 jtm
and 660 4m from head; length of oesophagus 4000
pom, of tail 45m, of unpaired part of ovejector 2100
Lm,
Allotype @: length of body 22 mm, width $30 jum;
trident length 190 jm; nerve ring and excretory pore
310 pm and 350 ym from head; length of oesopha-
gus 2850 pum, of tail 68 xm, of left spicule 800 pm, of
right spicule 650 jm.
Paratype 39s: Length of body 45, 22, 39 mm;
width 650, 610, 520 ,cm; tridents 205, 195, 190 wm;
nerve ring 300, 290, 330 jum from head; length of
oesophagus 2400, 2100 zm, damaged in 3rd; vulva
650, 730, 500 xm from head; tail length 40, 55, 55
p.m.
Paratype d: body length 22 mm, width 520 im,
trident length 165 zm; nerve ring 280 .m from head;
oesophagus 3400 xm long (muscular part 340 pm);
length of tail 80 jxm; of left spicule 785 jum, of right
spicule 500 jum.
REC, S, AUST. MUS. 18(13): 265-284
September, 1981
Variations observed among all the specimens:
tridents 165-190 um in males, 190-220 jm in
females; vulva 480-730 jum from head; oesophagus
2000-3600 «xm long in 9; left spicule 730-850 pm,
right spicule 500-680 zm. One male from AHC 6278
is teratological, with left and right spicules
respectively 260 ym and 310 pm.
Discussion
D. zeta Johnston & Mawsan, 1940, redescribed by
Anderson (1959) was also taken from Acanthagenys
rufogularis; the only temale known is of similar
dimensions to the present specimens, except that the
trident is smaller (150 jtm instead of 190-205 pm),
Moreover, there are two grooves on the head of
tridents in D. zeta not seen on any of the new
specimens, These twa differences, and the absence
of a male of D. zeta, prevent the identification of the
hew material as D_ zeta.
Five other species must be considered:
Two species have similar dimensions and spicule
shape: D. clelandi (Johnston, 1912) from Crac-
ticidae in Australia (male only known) and D,
kennedyi Grewal, 1965, from Pycnonotidae from
India. These two species are of doubtful status, as
their morphology is imperfectly Known, and it is
impossible to compare our specimens with them.
The three other species in which the trident and
spicules are similar to our specimens are disting-
uished as follows: in D, pungens (Schneider, 1866)
from Turdidae in Asia, the oesophagus is very long
(14500 jum in the 2) and three pairs of papillae lie
distinctly in front of the cloaca. In D. flabellata
(Linstow, 1888), from Paradiseidae in the Aru
Islands, the trident is more stoutly built, the body is
particularly wide, the glandular oesophagus very
long (6500-7500 jm in the female)—the left spicule
strongly curved and the male tail rounded,
In D, urocissoides Anderson, 1959, from Corvidae
in India, the head structure is characteristic (‘buccal
eavity surrounded by a clearly defined cuticular
thickening often forming a plug,’ Anderson, 1959)
and the number of papillae is small.
It seems that the material described here is new,
and the name D. smithi is proposed for it, in honour
of our colleague 1. Humphrey Smith. It ts
characterised by the large trident with blunt tip and
without grooves, the oesophagus not very thick and
not particularly long or short (2000-4000 j.m), the
spicules of medium length (730-850 pm and 500-600
j.1m) the tail of male rectangular in ventral view, with
precloacal papillae few in number and situated close
to the cloaca.
OVIPAROUS FILARIAL NEMATODES 281
Figure 12, Diplotriaena smithi n.sp. A, anterior end of female
holotype, lateral view; B, head of female paratype, apical
view; C, D, same female, apex of tridents; E, F, tail of same
female in lateral and ventral views; G, anterior end of male
allotype, lateral view; H, same male, oesophago-intestinal
junction; I, head of same male, lateral view; J, trident of
male paratype; K, tail of male allotype, ventral view; M, N,
male allotype, right and left spicules, ventral views; O, P, two
other views of same right spicule; A, E, G, M, N, O, P, to
scale 200 4m; B, H, F, J, K, L, to scale 100 wm; C, D, to
scale 50 ym; I, to scale 150 pm.
Diplotriaena delta Johnston & Mawson, 1940 tridents 115-120 4m and 100 tm; nerve ring 180,
(Fig. 13 A-O) 190 44m from head; oesophagus length 1850,
2110 wm, its muscular part 330, 160 ~m; vulva 525,
400 4m from head; tail length 70, 32 um; eggs
From Amytornis goyderi (Gould) (Maluridae), 46 x 29 um. The extremes of the oesophagus are
from the Simpson Desert, S. Aust.: 109, 2¢ (AHC 1750 um and 2400 um, in females measuring
Material
6274); 22 and 1d (MNHN 207 HD). respectively 62 mm and 70 mm.
Description
Additional morphological details are given in 29? body length 30, 28 mm, width 400, 380 1m;
Figure 13 A-O. tridents 110, 120 um; nerve ring 170, 160 um from
; ; head; left spicule 950 zm long, (calamus 240 ym),
Dimensions and 1050 ym; right spicule 720, 630 j1m long; tail 50,
22: body length 70, 72 mm, width 460, 400 um; 60 um.
282
Discussion
These specimens are identified as D. delta,
described from Malurus lamberti (Maluridae) in
Australia. This species, placed by Anderson (1959)
as a synonym of D. tridens (Molin, 1858), was
reinstated by Ogden (1965), who had specimens
from M. lamberti from various parts of Australia.
D. delta is recognisable by the simultaneous
presence of the following characters (taken from the
REC. 8. AUST. MUS. 18(13): 265-284
September, 1981
new material and from Ogden): large body size (60-
127 mm in female); tridents small (78-122 4m) with
three small digitations at the tip; oesophagus of
average size (1750-3900 um in female, 1560-
2600 ym in male), with glandular part thin or thick;
left spicule 950-1140 ym, right spicule 620-730 jm,
with triple twist; tail of male with two lateral
swellings.
Figure 13. A-O, Diplotriaena delta, A-E, female: A, anterior end,
subyentral view; B, head, en face; C, D, trident and its apex;
E, tail, ventral view; F-O, male; F, anterior end; G, H,
trident and its apex; I, J, two views of right spicule; K, L,
tight and left spicules of another male, lateral view; M, N,
tips of right and left spicules, ventral views; O, tail, ventral
view.
P-R, D. falconis. P, tail of female, ventral view; Q, profile of
cuticle at mid-body; R, tail of male, ventral view.
A, F, Q, to scale 500 pm; 1, J, K, L, to scale 200 jxm; P, to
scale 125 pm; B, E, G, M,
scale 50 zm.
N, O, R, to scale 100 pm; H, to
OVIPAROUS FILARIAL NEMATODES
Diplotriaena falconis (Connal, 1912)
(Fig, 13 P-R)
Material
From Falco berigora Vigors & Horsfield, from
Yorke Peninsula, S. Aust.: 32, 1d (AHC 6269).
Description
Additional morphological details are given in
Figure 13 P-R.
Measurements
29: body length 70, 72 mm; width 590, 660 ym;
trident length 135, 135 jum; nerve ring 230, 230 ym
from head; vulva 430, 660 4m from head;
oesophagus in second female 2550 jz£m long, with
muscwlar part 400 ym; tail 22, 28 zm; eggs
65 x 30 pm.
3; body length 45 mm, width 550 j.m, trident
length 135 wm, oesophagus length 2700 um, with
muscular part 450 yum; tail 32 xm long; left spicule
broken, 1025 4m long; right 1100 4m long (850 jum
if measured in a straight line).
Discussion
The measurements, general morphology, and the
characteristic anatomy of the left spicule agree with
those of D. falconis, redescribed by Anderson
(1959), from Falconidae in Africa, In the Australian
specimens, there are ten pairs of papillae in the
male, the tail of the female bears papillae, and the
cuticle of the female is marked with regular and
distinct undulations.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are grateful to all those who collected the
birds hosts or the parasites which enabled this work
toa be undertaken .. . these are Dr Ian Beveridge,
Mrs Joan Paton, Dr Dom Serventy, Mr Shane
Parker, and officials of the South Australian
Museum and the Northern Territory Administration
(Animal Industry and Agriculture Branch).
APPENDIX
Australian Species Described in this Paper, Arranged under
their Hosts
Corvidae
Corvus arry Bonaparte
Apmeta bakeri n.sp.
Diplotriaena beveridgei n.spy.
Cracticidae
Strepera graculina (Shaw)
Aprocia boulengert sp
Muscicapidae
Petroica multicolor (Gmelin)
Pseudaprocta copemani n.sp.
Pachycephala pectoralis (Latham)
Pseudaprocta copemant n.sp.
Oreoica gutturalis (Vigors and Horsfield)
Diplotriaena gpraii n.sp..
Maluridae
Amytornis goyderi (Gould)
Diplotriaena delia Johnston and Mawson
283
Meliphagidae:
Acanthogenys rufogularis Gould
Diplorriaena smithi n-sp.
Falconidae
Falca berigora (Vigors and Horsfield)
Diplotriaena falconis (Connal)
Serratospiculum guoatum (Schneider)
Faleo peregrinus Tunstall
S. tendo (Nitzsch)
Falco longipennis Swainson
Serratospiculum guiraium (Schneider)
Strigidae
Ninox navaeseelandiae (Gmelin)
Lissonema sp,
REFERENCES
Ati, S. M. 1956. Studies ou the nematode parasites of fishes ay
birds found in Hyherabad State. Indian J, Helminth,, 8, 1-83.
ANDERSON, R. ©. 1957. The life eycles of Dipetalonemand
Nematodes (Filarioidea, Dipetalonematidae): the problem
of their evolution, J. Helminth,. 31, 203-224.
AnpeRSON, R. C. and CHABAUD, A. G_ 1958, Taxonomie de I4
Filaire Squamofilaria sicki (Strachan, 1957) n.comb, et place
du genre Squamofilaria Schmerting, 1925 dans la sousfamille
Aproctinac, Anns Parasit. hum, comp., 33, 254-266.
Anperson, R. C, 1959, Preliminary revision of the genus
Diplorriaena Henry et Ozeux, 1909 (Diplotriaenidae:
Diplotriveninae). Parassitologia, 1, 195-314.
ANDERSON, R, C. and Bain, ©. 1976. CTH Keys to the Nematode
Parasites of Vertebrates, No. 3, Keys to genera of the Order
Spirurida, Part 3. Diplotriaenoidea, Aproctoidea and
Filarioidea, Ed. by RC. Anderson, A, G. Chabaud and 8.
Willmott.
Barn, O., and Vassivanrs_G, 1969, Cyele évolutif d'un Dicheu-
onematinat, Serrarospiculum tendo, Filaire parasite du
Faucon, Annls. Parasit. hum, camp., 44, 595-A04d.
Berrioz, J. 1950. Systématique. In Grassé P. P., Traité de
Zoologie, Oiseaux, 15, 1164 pp., Paris, Masson Fdit,
BouULENGER, M. A, 1928. Report on a collection of parasitic
Nematodes, mainly from Egypt, part VY, Filarioides,
Parasitology, 20, 32-55.
CABALLERO, B. y C. 1938, Contribucion al conocimento de los
Nematodos de las aves de México, VY. Livro Jubilar Prof,
Trayassos. Rio de Janeiro, 91-97,
CmHasaup, A. G, 195], Observation sur Aprocta noctuae Spaul,
1927 (Nematoda—Aproctidae), Arch. Inst. Pasteur Maroc, 4,
cah. 3; 236-243.
CHABAUD, A. G, 1974. C.T.H. Keys to the Nematode parasites of
Vertebrates; Noa. 1. Keys to Subclasses, Orders and
Superfamilies. Ed. by R. ©. Anderson, A. G, Chabaud, 8.
Willmott.
Cnarsrp, A, G., ANDERSON, A, C. and Bryooo, BE. R. 1959.
Sept Filuires d°OQiseaux malgaches. Annis Parasit, hum,
comp., 39, 69-94.
Cnanaup, A. G., BRYGoo.E, R. and RicHaru, J. 1964. Filaires
doiseaux malgaches (Deuxiéme note). Ann. Parasil. hum.
comp, 39, 69-94,
CHARAUB, A. G. and CHoaueT, MT. 1955. Helminjhes de la
région de Banyuls, [], Deux Filaires parasites d’Qiseaux. Vie
et Milieu, 6, 93-100,
DIAZ-UNGRIA, ©. 1963. Nématodes parasites, nauveaux ou
intéressants, du Venezuela. Annis Parasital. hum comp., 38,
893-913.
Durarpin, F. 1845. Histoire naturelle des Helminthes ou Vers
intesunaux, Pars, 654 pp
Ezzai, M. A. BE. et TApRos, G. 1958. Contribution to the
helminth fauna of Belgian Congo birds. Annis Mus. r, Conge
Belge, sér. 8, 69, 1-81.
Forebar, D. N. anid Kaw, L, 1965. New Diplotriacnid pematode
from the body cavity of Acndotheres tristis (Linnaeus)
Kashmir Sci., 2, 125-131-
Hoerrii, R, and Hsu, H. F_ 1929, Helminthologische Beitrage
wus Fukien und Chekiang. Arch. Schiffs. Tropenhyg., 33.
1-43,
Hsu, W.N. 1963. (Studies.on some parasitic Nematodes of order
Spirurida Chitwood, 1933). Acta 2ool. sin , 15, 544-552.
284
JounsTon, T. H, 1912. Notes on some Entozoa. Proc. Roy. Soc.
Qland, 24, 63-91.
JoHnston, T. H. and Mawson, P, M. 1940. Some filarial
parasites of Australian birds. Trans. R. Soc. South Aust., 64,
355-361.
Jonnstor, T, H. and Mawson, P. M. 1941. Some Nematodes
from Australian birds of pray. Trans, R. Soc. South Aust.,
65, 30-35.
Li, H. C, 1933. Report on a collection of parasitic nematodes,
mainly from North China. 1. Filarioidea. Parasitology, 25,
192-224,
LinsTow, O. 1883. Nematoden, Trematoden und Acanthocepha-
len, gesammelt von Prof, Fedtschenko in Turkestan, Arch.
Naturg., Berlin, 49, 274-314.
Linstow, O, 1903. Parasiten, meistens Helminthen, aus Siam.
Arch. Mikr. Anat., 62, 108-121.
OGDEN, C. G, 1966. Some parasitic Nematodes from Australian
birds. Annls Mag, Nat. Hist., ser. 13, 9, 505-518.
PINTO, R, M. and Noronna, D. 1970. Sébre uma nova especie do
género Diplotriaena Railliet et Henry, 1909 (Nematoda,
Filarioidea) Diplotriaena delirae sp. n. Atas Soc. Biol. Rio de
Janeiro, 14, 55-57.
QuenTIN, J. C., TRoncy, P. M. and BARRE, N. 1976. Aprocta
cylindrica Linstow, 1883, Filaire ovipare parasite d’Oiseaux
Ploceides au Tchad, Morphogénése larvaire du Nématode.
Annls Parasitol, hum. comp., 51, 83-93.
RAILLIET, A. and Henry, A. 1916. Les Filaires des Rapaces
(Falconiformes et Strigiformes), Bull, Soc. Path. Exot., 9.
364-368.
RASHEED, S, 1960. The Nematode parasites of the birds of
Hyderabad (India). Biologia, Lahore, 6, 116 pp.
Rupbo.pul, C, A. 1819. Entozoorum synopsis cui accedunt
mantissa duplex et indices locuplestissimi. Berolini, 811 pp.
SANDGROUND, J. H. 1933. Report on the nematode parasites
collected by the Kelley-Rooseyelts Expedition to Indo-China
with descriptions of several new species. Z. ParasitKde, 5,
542-583.
REC, $. AUST. MUS. 18(13): 265-284
September, 1981
SCHIKHOBALOVA, N. P. 1930. Sur une nouvelle filaire d’Oiseaux
Pseudaprocta gubernacularia n.g,, n.sp. Annis Parasit. hum.
comp., 8, 624-627.
ScumiptT, G. D. and Kuntz, R. E. 1970. Nematodes parasites of
Oceanica, VII, Filariids of birds, with a new genus and four
new species. Parasitology, 60, 313-326.
SCHNEIDER, A. 1866. Monographie der Nematoden, Berlin,
357 pp.
SeurAT, L. G. 1915. Expédition de M. M. Walter Rotschild, E.
Hartert et C. Hilgert dans le Sud-Algérien (Mars-Mai 1914).
Nématodes parasites. Novitates Zoologicae, 22, 1-25.
SinGH, 8S. N, 1949, Studies on the helminth parasites of birds in
Hyderabad State. Nematoda IV, J. Helminth., 23, 39-56.
SKRJABIN, K. I. 1915. Nématodes des Oiseaux du Turkestan
russe. Ann. Mus. Zool. Acad, St. Petersbourg, 20, 531-557.
Sonin, M. D. 1966. (Principles of nematology, edited by K. 1,
Skrjabin, Vol. 17, Filariata of animals and man and the
diseases caused by them. Part 1, Aproctoidea), Moscou:
Izdatelstvo “Nauka’’, 360 pp. (In Russian).
SONIN, M. D. 1968. Osnovi Nematodologii, 21 , Diplotriaenoidea,
Acad, Sci. Edit., Moscou, pp. 388.
Soora, T. D. and CHATURVEDI, Y. 1967. On two new Nematode
species of the genus Diplotriaena Railliet et Henry, 1909,
from Nepal and India. J. Zool, Soc. India, 19, 133-136.
Tupancui, M, A, 1934, Nematodes in the collection of the
Philippine Bureau of Science, II: Filarioidea. Philippine J.
Sc., 55, 115-123.
VUYLSTEKE, C, 1957, Nématodes parasites d’Oiseaux. Explora-
tion du Pare National de la Garamba. Mission H. de Saeger.
Bruxelles, 8, 3-20.
YorKE, W. and MApLestone, P. A. 1926. The Nematode
parasites of Vertebrates. London, J & A Churchill, 536 pp.
YoyorrTe, E. V. 1972, Etude de huit Nématodes parasites de
Vertébrés du Venezuela et de la Colombie. Bull. Mus. natn.
Hist. nat., 3e sér,, 41, Zool, 35, 477-498,
RECORDS OF THE
SOUTH AUSTRALIAN
MUSEUM
VOLUME 18 NUMBERS 14—16 JUNE 1982
No. 14 OBSERVATIONS ON CHYZERIA CANESTRINI AND SOME RELATED
GENERA (ACARINA: TROMBIDIOIDEA) WITH REMARKS ON THE
CLASSIFICATION OF THE SUPERFAMILY AND DESCRIPTION OF A
PYGMEPHORID MITE PHORETIC ON CHYZERIA
by R. V. SOUTHCOTT
No. 15 SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SOILS.
3. ARTHRONOTINA (CRYPTOSTIGMATA)
by DAVID C. LEE
No. 16 POLYCLAD TURBELLARIANS FROM THE SOUTHERN COASTS OF
AUSTRALIA
by STEPHEN PRUDHOE
SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM
North Terrace, Adelaide
South Australia 5000
OBSERVATIONS ON CHYZERIA CANESTRINI AND SOME RELATED
GENERA (ACARINA: TROMBIDIOIDEA) WITH REMARKS ON THE
CLASSIFICATION OF THE SUPERFAMILY AND DESCRIPTION OF A
PYGMEPHORID MITE PHORETIC ON CHYZERIA
BY R. V. SOUTHCOTT
Summary
The taxonomy of the Australian larvae of the genus Chyzeria Canestrini, 1897, is revised. Two new
species, Chyzeria flindersi sp. nov., from Tasmania, and C. derricki sp. nov., from Queensland, are
described. In addition, the larva of C. hirsti Womersley, 1934 is redescribed from material reared in
South Australia. The species Grossia onychia Womersley, 1954 is redescribed, from the type
specimen from Victoria, and placed in Chyzeria as C. onychia (Wom.), comb. Nov.
OBSERVATIONS ON CHYZERIA CANESTRINI AND SOME RELATED GENERA (ACARINA: TROM-
BIDIOIDEA) WITH REMARKS ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE SUPERFAMILY AND DESCRIP-
TION OF A PYGMEPHORID MITE PHORETIC ON CHYZERIA
by
R, V. SOUTHCOTT
Honorary Associate, South Australian Museum, Adelaide, South Australia 5000
(Manuscript accepted 27 January 1981)
ABSTRACT
SOUTHCOTT, R. V, 1982. Observations on CAyzeria Canestrini
and some related genera (Acarina: Trombidioides) with
remarks on the classification of the superfamily and description
of a pygemphorid mite phoretic on Chyzeria, Rec, S. Aus.
Mfus. 18 (14); 285-326.
The taxonomy of the Australian larvae of the genus
Chyzeria Canestrini, 1897, is revised. Two new spe-
cies, Chyzeria flindersi sp. nov., from Tasmania, and
C. derricki sp. nov., from Queensland, are deseribed.
In addition, the larva of ©. Airsti Womersley, 1934
is redescribed from material reared in South Aus-
iralia. The species Grossia onychia Womersley, 1954
is redescribed, from the type specimen {rom Victoria,
and placed in Chyzeria as C, anychia (Wom.), comb,
nov,
Details of the rearing of larvae of C, Airsti from
adult specimens fre given, The species appears to be
viviparous, and the larvae are carried phoretically on
the mother’s back. Such behaviour allows some allot-
ment of function to the digitations upon the dorsum
of the adult, and the specialized hair characteristics
of the intervening area. Parasitization of larval Chy-
zeria upona host is recorded only in lwo instances,
these being the record of the type series of C. derrick
sp. nov, on an unidentified tettigoniid grasshopper,
and the earlier record of C. onychia (Womersley)
purausilizing an adult identified by Womersley as Chy-
zeria australiensiy First,
A description of the adult of Chyzeria hirsti Wom-
ersley (elevated from a subspecies to a species here)
lrom the holotype is given, and some comparison
made with the Chyzeria australiensis Hirst, 1928,
type series from Western Australia.
The classification of the larvae of Chyzeria, Gros-
sia, Audyana and others is examined. Grossia is
considered a synonym of CApzeria. These genera are
removed from the subfamilies Apoloniinae and Las-
seniinue, where they have been placed by some
authors, to the family Trombellidae Feider 1955 (ear-
lier subfamily Trombellinae Thor, 1935) of the Trom-
bidigidea. Larvae of an Australian species of Mon-
erslevyia Radford are recorded as parasitic upon the
cricket Teleogryllus commodus (Walker), in northern
New South Wales, and nymphs reared experimentally
are placed in Trombella udelajdeae Womersley,
June, 1982
1939, thus allowing the synonymizing of Womers/evia
With Trambella Berlese, 1887. This defines a further
larval form of the Trombellidae,
The relationships of some of the genera, Carmilivs
and subfamilies of the Trombidioidea are. briefly
examined,
A new species of pygmephorid mite (Tarsonemius}
is recorded as phoretic upon the dorsum of an adult
Chyzeria hirsti Wom., and described us Bakerdania
workandae sp, nov,
INTRODLCTION
In this paper the author records a number of obser-
vations on the morphology and biology of the genus
Chyzeria Canestrini, (897, with particular reference
to the larvae. This genus belongs to the family Trom
bidiidue (s. 1.) of the superfamily Trombidiowen
Banks, 1894.* 4 group of prostigmatic mites which
exhibil extreme heteromorphy between the adults
(and mobile nymphs) and the larvae, This hetero
morphy is in fact so great that in the superfarnily the
adults and larvae cannot be correlated with each
other without experimental rearing. As both lurvue
and adults have 1 be described under separate names
until such correlations ure established, classificatory
systems for the post-larval forms may not, and in fact
ollen do not, correspond to thit for the larvae. with
inevitable confusion, and, in a number of cuses.
nomenclatorial difficulties, The present paper attempts
to place the classification of the Jarvae related 1
Chyzerta on u firm basis, with detailed deseripuuns,
and biological data where available. Two new species
of larval Chyzeria will be deseribed, and additionally.
two previously recorded species will be redeseribed.
one being C. eavehia (Womersley, 1954), mn. comb..
previously Grossia anvchia Wom,
“Although this superfamily name was first proposed as such by
Banks in 1894, under Article 36 of the International Code of
Zoological Nomenclature, 1961, all categories in the family-group
(which includes the superfamily category) are of co-ordinate stalus,
As jt is generally accepted that the family name Trombidiidav
was first validly proposed by Leach in 1815 as *Trombidides”,
the superfamily name Trombidioidea is available from the year
1815 (See Oudemans, 1937; Thor and Willmann, 1947; Southcot,
1957d).
8b
The trombidiid mite genus Chyzeria was founded
by Canestrini in 1897, with the adult C. ornata
Canestrini, 1897, as the type species, collected at
Friedrich Wilhelmshafen (later Madang) in New
Guinea, Since that time several further species have
been described from Australia (including Tasmania),
New Zealand, Africa and South America (Hirst
1924, 1928a, b, 1929; Womersley 1934, 1942; Law-
rence 1944: Thor and Willmann 1947, André and
Lelievre-Farjon 1960).
The three #enera Trombella Berlese, 1887, Chy-
ceria and Parachyceria Hirst, 1926, based on adults,
were placed in the subfamily Trombellinae Thor,
1935 by Thor and Willmatin (1947) in their mono-
graphic review of the taxonomy of the fumily Trom-
bidiidae; this subfamily was separiuted from all others
of the Trombidiidae on the ground of its lack of a
orista metopica. Within the subfamily, adults of Chy-
ceria are distinct in possessing & serjes of digitatians
arranged around the rim of the dorsum of the idio-
soma. These digitations ure covered by lwo lypes of
normal body setae (scobalae): one suff and swordlike,
the other flexible, longer and ciliated. In between
these digitations the central dorsal area of the idio-
soma js covered with another type of modilied seob-
alae. In at least two Australian species, CL ausztrel-
jensis Hirst and C. Airsti Womersley, these last
named setae are modified to long, unciliated, highly
convoluted hairs,
The genus Parachyzeria, known from Aftiea and
Asia, is similar to Capzeria, with a central area of
modified setae dorsally upon the idiosoma (Lese
being long and straight), but lacks the peripheral
processes.
So suggestion has been made as lo the possible
funetion of the peculiar structural adaptations of
these mites, although in the case of Chyreria, the
opportunity to do so, to ut Jeast some degree, existed
over 40 years ago,
In }938 | made a series of attempts to correlate
Jarval and postlarval forms of trombidiid mites by
experimental rearings, using South Australian
material. Among genera reared, and made available
to Herbert Womersley, then Entomologist. South
Australian Museum, was Chvzeria. These lurvae were
deseribed by Womersley in 1939, and allotted to
Chyzerla australiensis Hirst, 1928, despite the fact
that all adult Chpzeria from the “Adelaide District”
he had examined earlier (Wormersley, 1934) were
allotted by him to C. australiense (sic) var. hirsti
Wom. 1934,
REC, S. AUST. MUS., 18 (14): 285.320
dune, 1982
] had seen these reared larvae in captivity on the
udult’s back, At times they ventured away to the soil
below and then returned to the protection presumably
allorded by the dorsum of the idiosoma of the parent.
These observations were recounted to Womersley and
offered for incorporation in his article, but although
he was prepared to describe the larvae with their
unusual morphological structure, he chose not to
include the observations, possibly doubting their
accuracy or relevance, or more likcly being little
interested in details of mite behaviour.
Womersley recognized that these larval mites, with
their bizarre complement of dorsal and ventral setae,
as well as unusual palp and (pedi)iarsal claw structure.
were very different trom any previously described
trombidiid mites, They will be placed here as Chyzerra
hirsti Womersley, 1934,
After returning to South Australia front military
duties | made a number of attempts to rear larvae of
Chyzeria, ind on three further oceasions | obtained
lurvae from adults, These experiments tre recorded
below, and confirm the larva-adull correlation origi-
nally seen in 1938.
The larval Chyrerta hirsti has each of its three
pairs of legs 7-segmented (including the coxa); i.e. its
leg Segmental formula is 7, 7, 7. Its leg coxae have
iwo setae upon coxa J, and one each upon coxae Ii
und Ul, i.e. its leg coxal formula is 2, 1, |.
In late 1945 | captured a larval trombidiid mite at
Lake St. Clair, Tasmania, walking up the trunk of a
cucalypi. This mite was very similar to the larval
Chyzeria hirsti, and was clearly referable to the same
genus, It had a trifid palpal tibial claw, 7-segmented
legs, dorsal idiosomal setae placed upon expanded
plates, ley coxal formula 2, 1, 1, and a number of
other resemblances, The most obvious difference lay
im the lack of modification of the scutalac. particu-
larly the AL scutalae. This specimen is described in
the present paper as the holotype of CAyzeria flin-
dersi sp.nov.
In 1954 Womersley (p. 1) 1) deseribed as a new
genus and species Grossia onyehia Wom, 1954, a
larval trambidiid mite which had been collected
altached to an adult identified as Chyzeria ausiral-
fensis Hirst in the Otway Ranges, Victoria, in 1951.
In 1947 Wharton had revised the classification of
the subfamilies of the chigger mites, family Trom-
biculidae Ewing 1929*, separating them on the char-
acters shown in Table I.
*Formally proposed ws such by Ewing (1944).
OBSERVATIONS ON CHYZERI 4A GANESTRINI AND SOME RELATED GENERA o87
TABLE |,
Ley segmental Coxal sétal
CLASSIFICATION OF SUBFAMILIES OF TROMBICLILIDAE, AS PROPOSED BY WIARTON (1947).
Median scowl Anterior scutal
formula formula Tratheae setae projection Sternal setae
Subfamily Leeuwenhuckiinie 6,6, 6 2, Present Frequently (Frequently) No more
Womersley (1944) (= 2 preset (hun 2
Leeuwenhockidae,
Womersley, 1944"
Subfamily Walehiinae 7, 6,8 ier Tiles Absent (1) LAbsentt At least 4
Rwing, 1946
Subfamily Apoloniinue 77,7 1. —. — Present (}-2) Present (4)
Wharton, 1947
Subfamily Trombicu)inae 7,47 Absent | Absent AL leust 4
Ewing, 929
*Formally proposed as such by Womersley (1945),
Womersley’s Grossia onychia has a leg segmental
formula 7, 7, 7, and a leg coxal formula of 2, 1, I.
Ite placed it in the subfamily Apolominac, whose
definition had been enlarged by Wharton and Fuller
in 1952, to accommodate the genus Sauracere/la
Lawrence 1949, which has a leg segmental formula
of 7. 7, 7, but With a coxal setal formula of 1, 12).
! and lacked tracheac, and also has expanded sensil-
lary setae; the earlier criterion of “posterior lateral
scutal setae not on the seutuim” was omitted.
In the sane paper (1954) Womersley revised the
taxonomy of a number of larval mites he placed in
the family Leeuwenhockiidae, subfamily Apoloniinge,
In addition to the larval genera that he deelared had
been placed in the Apoloniinue by previous
authors=-Apolonia Torres and Braga, 1938 and
Womerslevia “Wharton” (actually the genus placed
there by Wharton in 1947 was MWomersia Wharton,
1947) und Savracarella Lawrence, 1949—he included
formally six further genera, these being Cockingsia
Womersley, 1954, Aud vana Womersley, 1954, Muck-
errasiella Womersley. 1954, Neotrombidium Leon-
ard: 1901 (with Monunguis Wharton 1938 as a syn-
onym), Grassia nov., Nothotrombicula Dumbleton,
1947 and Womerslevia Radford, 1946. In his paper
Womersley stated that ‘This is a heterogeneous
assemblage of genera’, which subsequent studies have
amply confirmed. The genus Mackerrasiella has been
shown by Vereammen-Grandjean (1972) to be one of
the Hydrachnellac, genus Midr\phantes Koch, 1841
and falls in synonymy. The genus 4vdyana was
placed alternatively, in the same paper by Womer-
sley, in the subfamily Trombellinae Thor 1935, since
larvae had been reared to nymphs resembling Tron
hella, in Malaya. Additionally it may be commented
that of the genera listed by Womersley, Grovsia,
Nothatrombicula and Womerslevia have leg sezmen-
tal formula 7, 7. 7, while Cockingsia, Andyana and
Mackerrasiella have leg segmental formula 7. 6, 6.
Womersley (/uc cit.) included alsa in his key to the
genera the genera Neotrombidium Leonardi, 1901
and Monunguis Wharton, 1938, stating in error that
they had leg segmental formula 7, 7, 7; actually in
Neotrombidium it is 7. 6 6. and in Monunguts
6. 6, 6, which Womersley eventually recognized (pub-
lished posthumously (Womersley, 1963)),
The resemblance between the larvae of Chyzeria
as deseribed by Womersley in 1939. Grassi onyvelia
Wom. 1954. and Nothorrambicula deinacridae
Dumbletwon, 1947, from New Zealand is striking, but
in this (1954a) paper Womersley made no reference
lo it, Evidently. by 1953-1954, he had forgotten his
1939 description. Another possible fictor may have
been the maccuracies in his account of the Chyzeria
larva, of Which the claws of the tarsi of the legs were
stilted to have “claws three, the lateral ones clavate
“while in Grassfa cach leg tarsus was stated to
Possess “paired spathulate sctae on each larsus at the
base of the single claw’, these lateral claws also being
relerred to as ‘a pair of shorter [than the central
tarsal claw] apically spathulute tenent setae’. Both
Grossia onvehia and Nothotrombicula deinacridue
have been redescribed by Vereammen-Grandjecan
(1972), as possessing spathulate neolateral pedotarsal
claws (see the anatomical terminology in Southeart
196]a).
In 1968 Vercammen-Grandjean and Kolebinova
revised the subfamily Apoloniinac, restricting iv to
seven species, allotted among six genera: these were
arranged in two tribes, the Apoloniinit and the Saur-
acarellini.. They rejected all of the genera included in
the Apoloniinae by Womersley (19544), with the
exception of the type genus Apolenia,
As slated above, Vercammen-Grandjean (1972) re-
examined the status of the mites that Womersley had
placed in his greatly expanded Apoloniinae, He
placed both Grossia and Nothotrombicula in the
subfamily Lasseninae (sic, for Lasseniinae) Newell,
1957, of the family Johnstonianidae Thor, 1935* (for-
merly Johnstonianinae Thor, 1935). Vercammen-
Grandjean made no reference in his paper to the
larval Chyzeria that Womersley had described jn
1939,
* Formally elevated as such by Newell (1957).
IRA
The subfamily Johnsionianinae had been founded
by Thor in 1935 for those (adult) Trombidiidae, in
which a distinet crista metopica is present, wilh two
pairs of dorsal sensilla, together with some minor and
less specific features, This was a distinct group, cle-
vated to family status as Johnstonianidae by Newell
(1957), in a study of a series of trombidioid mites
from Hawaii and North America, on the ground that
these mites differed so profoundly from other terres-
trial Parasitengona that they could not logically be
retained in the old family Trombidiidae. The differ-
ences were, in fact, greater than used by Ewing to
separate off the family Trombiculidae from the
remaining Trombidiidae. In that study Newell
included seven genera in the family, which he divided
into the subfamilies Johnstonianinac Thor and Las-
seniinac Newell, 1957, The latter subfamily was
erected for the general Lassenia Newell, !957, Poly-
discia Methlagl, 1928 and Crossothrombium Wom-
ersley, 1939. Laxssenia was founded on L, lasseni
Newell, 1957 as type genus, an adult mite in which
the principal character was the great reduction of the
anterior sensilla when compared with the posterior
sensilla. As well as two species of adults, Newell (oc.
cit.) described two species of larvae, which he placed
in the genus on morphological characters und field
association, but without the confirmation of experi-
mental rearing. In these larvae the dorsal scutum
carries two pairs of normal setae (scutalae) as well as
the two pairs of sensilla, Newell made no reference
REC, S. AUST, MUS,, 18 (14). 285-326
June, 1982
to any genera of Trombiculidae (Trombiculinae) nor
the Leeuwenhoekiidae (Leeuwenhoekiinae), nor to the
genus Chyzeria or other Trombellinae.
In 1973 Vercammen-Grandjean submitted a clas-
sification of the Trombidioidea, divided into eight
families and a number of subfamilies and tribes.
Among the families considered were listed Trombel-
lidae, Johnstonianidae, Neotrombidiidae noy., and
Leeuwenhoektidac. In that revision he placed Chy-
zeria in the Trombellidae and Grossia in the John-
stonianidae. Womersleyia appears to have been omit-
ted.
As it is not possible in the present paper to deal
with the overall classification of the Trombidioidea,
it is proposed to submit a detailed examination of the
status of the genera Chyzeria and Grossia, and to
make some incidental reference to some other taxa,
tn an effort to clarify the relationships of several
genera of the Trombidioidea.
Table 2 lists a number of genera of larval Trom-
bidioidea which haye been referred to cither the
Trombellinae, Leeuwenhoekiinae (Leeuwenhocki-
idae), Lasseniinae or Apolontinae by various authors,
as well as several genera of other families of the
superfamily Trombidioidea which are included for
purposes of comparison.
TABLE 2. PossiBLy SIGNIFICANT GENERIC CHARACTERS FOR THE LARVAE* IN A NUMBER OF ‘THE SUPERFAMILY
TROMBIDIOIDEA.
Cxi Cx2 Cx3 LI Li LIT AM PL. Nas Claws ss
Chyzeria 2 1 1 7 7 7 0 2 0 3 2
Grassia 2 ! ] 7 7 7 0 2 0 3 2
Nothotromtbleula 2 \ l 7 7 7 0) 2 | 3 2
Chatra 2 ] 5-7 6 6 6 1 2 0 2? 2
Monunguis | 5] ! 6 6 6 2 2 ! ] 2
Neatrombidium 2 l | 7 6 6 2 2 ] 1 2
Cackingsia 2 L | 7 6 6 2 2 | | 2
Leeuwenhoekia 2? \ | 6 6 6 2 2 | 3 2 T
Audyana 2 | | 7 6 6 2 2 0) 1 2
Apalonia | I | 7 7 7? 2 i) | 3 2 at
Womersia ] | ! 7 7 7 l 0 | 3 2 T
Womersleyla 2 1 ] 6 6 6 2 2 | 1,1,2 2
Mackerrasiella 2 1 1 7 7 7 Q 2 0) 1 24
(=Hydryphantes)
Butrombicula ] l 1 7 7 7 \ 2 0 3 2
Babiangia | | | 7 wi T | 2 0 3 2
Odontacarus 2 ] | 6 6 6 2 2 | 4 2 V
Watacarus 1 | \ 7 7 7 i 2 0) 3 2
Preridapus 2 | 1 7 7 7 0 2 (1) 3 4
Palydiseia 2 ! 2 7 7 7 0 2 (1) 4 4
Durenia 2 ) | 6 6 6 Z 2 ] 1,P,2 z T
Taraxithrombium 2 ] l 7 f 6 2 2 I | 2
Podathrombium 2 ] 1 6 4 6 2 2 I 3 2
Ralphaudyna 2 ] ! 7 7 7 (92) 2 | 3 47)
Walchia i a l-3 7 6 6 ) 2 0 3 2
(+)
Lassenla 2 2 3-4 6 6 6 () 2 () 3 4
lassent
Lassenia 2 | 2 6 6 6 0 2 0) 3 4
seutellata
Sauracarella ] (2) ] 7 7 7 2 2 | 3 2
i
T Tracheae present
jn ne eee ttttIISItSsSSISSSSSS
* The listing of a genus in this Table does not imply that I necessarily accept that these genera are all distinct from cach other: nor
that they are particularly related to each other,
OBSERVATIONS ON CH) ZERIA GANESTRINI AND SOME RELATED GENERA
The abbreviations used are Cx, 2 and 3, the num-
ber of coxalae or setae upon the ventral surface of
the coxae (Le. omilting supracoxalae), L J, If and
LI, the numbers of segments in the legs, including
the coxae (the traditional term coxae being used here,
in place of terms introduced by later authors); AM,
the number of anleromedian setae (scutalae) to the
dorsal scutum; PL the number of posterolateral scu-
talae to the dorsal scutum; Nas, the presence (1) or
absence (0) of a “nasus” or anterior projection ta the
dorsal scutum; 8S, the total number of scutal sensilla.
The information is derived from the most recent or
accurate authorities On these data, as quoted in the
list of references, or from the detailed descriptions
viven in the present paper.
Ii is clear that the classification of the larval Trom-
bidividea is not yet on a firm basis, since we have,
for example, various classifications for a fairly homo-
geneous group of larvae related to Chyreria, these
having been placed in the subfamilies Trombellinac,
Apoloniinae and Lassentinae by different authors.
It is proposed io this paper lo re-examine and
redescribe the larvae of CAvcerfa (including Grossia)
from the further material now availiable, and to
attempt to define the characters of the Trombellinae
(Trombellidae) lor larvae. The relationships of the
genera Neatrantbidium, Monunguis and Cockingsia
have ulready been examined by the writer jn other
papers (Southeott 1954a. 1957c) as well as by others,
and any further consideration will be deferred to later
works, The larva of the genus Audyana Womersley,
1954, with its leg segmentation formula 7, 6. 6 and
single-clawed pedolursi, appears al first sight to be
not particularly related to the Trombellinae considered
here. Nevertheless, it has been correlated by rearing.
One lurther genus was placed by Womersley
(19548) in his expanded Apoloniinae, namely Hoi
erslevia Radford, 1946. In an earlier draft of the
present paper | had written that although this
appeared to be a well-defined genus, there wus nu
strong evidence to connect it with Chizeria, Grossia
and Nothotrombicu/a and had decided to exclude it
from further consideration in the present paper,
Recently, however, | have been sent a batch of larval
orange-coloured miles Laken as ectoparasites on adults
of Teleogrvilus contmadus (Walker), the field cricket,
collected 10 km N of Armidale, New South Wules,
on }2 und 19 March 1980, by Mr Steve Davidson.
These proved to be typical Womerslevia, bul the leg
segmentation formula is 6. 6, 6, and not 7, 7, 7, as
recorded by Womersley (1954a, p. 114). (Vereammnien-
Grandjean (1972) had correeted this for HM’) miinnta
289
Radford.) It has been possible to rear a number of
these larvae to nymphs, which are typical 7rontbella,
keying down (as far as is possible for nymphs) to
Trombella adelaideae Womersley, 1939, in the key
of Womersley (1954b, p, 128),* The further deserip-
tion of these Australian larval Tromibella and their
nymphs will be dealt with in later papers.
A Turther genus referred lo the Trombellidae was
Ralphaudyna Vercammen-Grindjean er al,, 1974, this
action being based on its morphology. I is interesting
lo nate, however, that there are significant resem-
blances to those larvae allotted by Newell (1957) to
Lassenia in the dorsal scutum and other features.
At the present lime it is probably fair to consider
that larval trombidioid mies which can reasonably
be allotted to the Trombellidae are species ascribed
to the genera Chyzeria, Nothetrambicula, Woner-
slevia (=Trombella), Audyana and Ralphaudyna.
*As H consequence. Radfurd's species is here pe-oamed Pronpheller
pitatita (Radtird, 1946), carmb. nay
SUBFAMILY AND FAMILY
CONSIDERATIONS
Within the family Trombidiidae Leach, 1815. us
defined by Thor (1935) and Thor and Willniann
(1947), a number of groups have been separated alt
into families, e.g.
Trombiculidae Ewing, 1929*, Leeuwenhoekiidae
Womersley, 1944*, Vatacaridae Southeott, 1957,
Jobnstonianidae*, Calotrombidjidae (sic) Feider, } 959,
and a number of others, Among these is the family
Trombellidae (foritally proposed as such by Feider
(1955)), based upon the genus Trumbella Berlese,
1887. and erected originally as (he subfamily Trom-
dellinae Thor, }935,
Family Trombellidae Thor, 1935
Syn, Trombellinae Thor, 1935; Thor and Willmann,
1947; Trombellidae Feider, 1955
Definition
‘Trombidioid** mites lacking 2 erista metopica in
the adult und uctive nymphal stages. Propedosuma
eurrics a pair of dorsal sensilla. Definition of Jarva
deferred,
Key to Larval Genera of the Family Trombellidae
| Lee segmental formule 7, 7. 7 2
Leg segmental Tormuli 7,6, 6 or 6, 6. 6 4
2 (1) Dorsal seutum lacking wnreramedian Projection ("nasus |)
Chyzeria Canesten 1897
*See earlier comments in this paper ag the formal dates on which
these numes were proposed,
**For a definition of Trambidivides, see Sourheotl (19570, p )73)
200
Dorsal scutum with interomedian projection (inasus’) 3
3 (2) Dorsal seuruny with # setae
Relphavdvne Vereammen-Crandjeun ef al, 1974
Dorsal scurum with 6 setae
Dumbletun (947
41) leg segmental formula 7, 6.6
Leg segmentil formals 4. 6, 6
[S87 (— Womersteyia Radtopd |946)
Nuthotrambiuha
Andvana Womersley 1954
Trambella Berlese
Genus Chyserta Canestrini
Chy ceria Canestrini 1897, p. 463; 1899, p. 390. Hirst
1924, p, 1077; 1928a p. 563: 1928b p. 1021:
1929 p. 165. Vitzthum 1931 p, 148; 1942 p. 286.
Womersley 1934 p. 182; 1937, pp. 75, 76; 1939,
p. 155: 1942, p. 169, Lawrence 1944 p. 438.
Thor and Willmann 1947 p, 203. Baker and
Wharton 1952 p, 250. Vercammen-Grandjean
1955 p. 260; 1973b p, 110, André and Lelievre-
Farjon 1960 p. 461, Southcott 19614 p. 563,
André 1962 p. 124, 1963 p, 561. Vercammen-
Grandjean and Kolebinbova 1968 p. 250. Robaux
1969 p, 69. Krantz 1978, p. 351.
Grossia (as larva) Womersley 195da p, LI) 1. Audy
1954 p, 166; 1957 p. 442. Vercammen-Grandjean
1967 p. 2; 1971b p, 315; 1972 p. 231; 1973a p.
58: 19734b p. 110, Robaux 1977a p. 666.
Type species: CAyzeria ornata Canestrini, 1897,
(original designation)
Definition of Adult
Trombidijdae without well-defined crista metopica,
but a shield may be present in the central area of
dorsum of propadosoma. A pair of dorsal idiosomal
sensilla may arise upon a protuberance. usually anterior
to the level of the eyes, Eyes 2 + 2, sessile. Dorsum
of idiosoma with a lateral column of finger-like pro-
cesses, covered with setae which may be of two distinet
types, the one stiff and pointed. the other flexible.
Additionally there may be a dorsal anteromedian
projection arising about level with the most anterior
of the dorsolateral projections, and a posteromedial
projection. Area between the dorsal projections of the
idiosoma with numerous fine, long, convoluted setae.
Definition of Larva
Vrombidjid larvae with a single prodorsal scutum,
transversely placed, with AL and PL scutalae placed
towards AL and PL angles respectively of scutum.
No anteromedian scutalac. A pair of seutal sensilla
present, widely separated, placed at about the mid-
level of scutum. Sensillary hairs filiform, ciliated.
Eyes 2 + 2, conjoined, sessile, placed laterally or
posterolaterally to scutum. Intercoxal formula 0, 0,
2. Peducoxal formula 2, 1, 1. Legs with divided
femora, 1c. leg segmental formula 7, 7, 7 (including
coxac). Fedocoxalae may be short, stout, pointed,
blunted, peg-like, smooth or irregular. Pedotarsal claws
REC §. AUST. MLS.. 18 (14), 285-426
June, 1982
all rather slender: anterior terminating in expanded
suction-membrane; middle (neomedian) claw normal,
more or less falciform; posterior claw similar to ante-
rior, Palpal tibial claw strong, divided into three strong
divergent tines. Idiosamal setae may arise [rom small
plates, these being expansions of the normal alveolar
annulus of the seta. Ventral setae may have the basal
part of the shaft (scobillum) thickened.
Key (0 Known Larvae of Chypseria
1 AL, seutalac short, blunt, rebust, somewhut expanded, with
short, strong serrations. about 17-20 um Jong. Pedicoxalae
short, blunted, rhultituberculare, with tubercles present wlong
must of (he setal shaft (scobillum). Posterior dorsal idioso-
Inalae fo wbout 46 um long
Chyzeria hirsti Womersley, 1934 (South Australia)
AL scutalue normal, tapering, moderately pointed. more or
less cihuled, Pedicoxilae cither tapering, potted and ciliated,
or blunted and tuberculate, but in the latter case with (he
(ubereley absent in the proximal half of the seobillum.
Posterior dorsal idigsomual setac in range of 75-140 um 2
2 ()) Pedicoxulae pointed or very slightly blunted. AL. scutalae
wboul | 12 am long; AL/(A+P)> 2.1
Chizerta onvehia (Womersley, 1954) (Victoria)
Pedicoxalue very blunt-ended. AL seutalae in range of 55-
107 wm long: AL /(A-P)< 2.1 3
42) Pedicoxalae weakly tuberculale through (he distal hall of
the setal shalt (seobillum), AL scutalge about 55 wm long;
AL/(A-P) about 1.06, Palpal tibial claw tines only slightly
divergent Chyeeria flinderst sp. nov, (Tasman)
Pedicoxulue weakly (uberculale in wboul the distal one quarter
of the shalt of the seta (scobilum), AL seutahte tn range
of KK-107 pan tong: “WL/(A-P) 19-20. Palpal tibial claw
tines widely divergent
Chyeria derrick sp. nov. (Queensland)
ht
Chyzeria hirsti Womersley
(Figs. [A, B; 2 A-Fy 3; 4 A-D)
Chyzeria australiense (sic) var. firsti Womersley,
1934 p. 182; Womersely 1937, p. 76 (as adult)
Chyzeria australiense (sic) Womersley, 1939, p. 155
(as larva)
Nee C. australiense (sic) Hirst 1928 (1928a) p. 563
(adult)
Description of Larva (based largely upon specimen
ACB 13/14 L.1) (Figs. 1A, B; 2A-G) Colour in life
red, Length of idiosoma (mounted on slide) 285um,
width 190um; Lotal length of animal from tip of
chelicerue to posterior pole of idiosoma 360um,
Dorsal scutum about twice as wide as long, trupe-
zoidal with somewhat rounded angles, the scutum
widest posteriad, Anterior margin somewhat simuous,
posterior margin somewhat convex (a little angulated
in the middle), lateral margins slightly concave. Seutal
sensilla very widely separated, and behind level of
middle of scutum. AL scutalae placed towards AL
angles of scutum, PL scutalae towards PL ungles of
sculum,
OBSERVATIONS ON CHYZERIA GANESTRINI AND SOME REI ATED GENERA %|
TABLE 3.
Designated
variate ACB 13/14 ACB 13/14 is isa
1] 12 !
AW S6 83 73
PW 110 116 104
SB 61 66 37
ASBa 9 37 35
ASBp 29 28 2h
I, 68 65 6!
WwW 126 L34 ella
AP 32 3] 3t
Al is WY 20
PL 39 25 29
Sens 59 63 53
DS 29-57 45-57 24-49
mid-DS 39-44 35-42 39-40
PDS 45 44 24-37
Anterior scutalue short, robust, spindle-shaped, cil-
iated, the cilia blunted, outstanding a little and thus
the AL scutala resembles a distorted partly opened
pine-cone with about 9 bracts; posterior scutalae rather
longer, pointed, clongate-spindle-shaped, with proj-
ecting barbed pointed cilia. Scutal sensillary hairs
slender, with distal sparse cilia,
Eyes 2 + 2, sessile, near PL angles of scutum;
corneae oval to ovoid, posterior the larger. Anterior
cornea has maximum diameter |5um, posterior has
maximum diameter |9um.
Dorsal idiosomalue long, very slightly tapering,
pointed, slightly ciliated with barbed cilia. Setae arise
from small plates, oval or somewhat straight-edged
where they impinge upon cach other; plates are
expansions of normal annuli of alveolar sockets; setae
usually arise eccentrically upon the plates. Setae
arranged 6, 6, 6, 6, 2; total 26.
Venter lacking setae on idiosoma between coxae |
and Il. Between coxae II] a pair of tadish-shaped
setae, having an expanded basal part to the shaft
(scobillum), the remainder long, tapering, pointed:
setie 17um long. Behind the level of coxae II] are
about 30 setae (apart from the four anals), similar to
the last, arranged in somewhat irregular transverse
rows across the ventral opisthosoma. These setae
change in character as one proceeds posteriad. The
more anterior setae are short and “radish-like” or
“parsnip-like’, with a thickened basal part of the
scobillum and a maximum thickness at about the
middle of the seta, and are similar to the pair between
coxae IT]. All ventral idiosomal setae arise from small
basal plates (expanded annuli). Posteriad the setae
gradually become more elongate, more ciliated and
STANDARD ASD OTHER DATA FOR SOME LARVAR OF Chyceria hirsty
Specimen
ACB322 AC B468 ACB46% ACBSM
12 L| La LI
79 7K 7 nh?
96 110 107 i)
55 57 sy i)
33 28 2 oh
23 cals 29 Ly)
535 cade s7 64
he 149 138 tan
29 a2 4] a)
\7 18 {9 17
29 29 43 2
50) Ol Ss?
40-52 43-42 34-66) 42-50
40 42 39-66, 43
44 37-46 33-39 3H-d)
stronger, but lose the bulbous expansion. Setac of
anterior row ure 16-2] um long, and the posterior setae
to 37m Jong. Anus with two oval valves, 45um long
by 374m across with the valve lips in apposition.
Each anal valve with two long setae, anterior pointed,
ciliated 22um Jong, posterior blunted, ciliated 28um
Jong. Idiosomal setae lateral to anus tapering, pointed,
clongate, 354m long,
Coxalace 2, 1, 1, All coxalae short, stout, unciliated,
with indefinite coarse tuberculitions in lateral aspect.
und terminally somewhat bifid. resembling an irreg-
ular plum in shape; setae 9-Tlum long by 5-7um
across. The tuberculations number about 7, and ure
placed more or less distally upon the setal shaft or
scobillum.,
Legs normal. with the distal ends of femora. genua
and tibiae tending to expand. Leg [ 375um long, II
380um, Hl 420um (all lengths include coxae and
claws). Leg scobulae normal. curved, ciliated, termi-
nally pointed or blunted.
Tarsus 964m long by 29um high, tibia | 55m
long, genu | 46um (Til/Gel = 1.20); tarsus [1]
1Olum long by 24um high, tibia ITE 55am. genu I
S4um (Ti /Gelll = 1.01). (Tarsal lengths given
exclude claws and pedicle.). Genu. | with specialized
seta VsGel,77pd: tibia | with SoTil.1 4ad. SoTil. Sad,
VsTil.s6pd. Genu [1] with specialized seta
VsGell.79pd. Tibia TI] with specialized seta
SoTi1.22pd. Tarsal setae as figured. Tarsal pedicle
normal. Pedotarsal claws: anterior and posterior slen-
der, spathulate, middle (neomedian) falciform., slen-
der. unciliated, With sharp terminal downturned tip.
Gnathosoma rather small, compact, fattened pas-
292 REC. S. AUST, MUS., 18 (14): 285-326 June, 1982
FIG. 1. Chyzeria hirsti Womersley, larva, specimen ACB13/14
L1. A, Dorsal view, legs on right hand side of figure omitted
beyond trochanters; to scale on left. B, Detail of a dorsal
idiosoma! seta and its basal plate; not to scale.
OBSERVATIONS ON CHYZERIA GANESTRINI AND SOME RELATED GENERA 293
oe hy |
=
re
eo YI
As sd)\S
2) ——S + A es
E F
FIG. 2. Chyzeria hirsti Womersley, larva, specimen ACB13/14
Li. A, Ventral view, legs on right hand side of figure omitted
beyond trochanters; to scale on left. B, Palpal tarsus, enlarged.
C, Claws of tarsus I, enlarged. D, E, F, Posterior ventral
idiosomal setae, enlarged. G, Pedocoxal seta, enlarged. (B-G
not to scale.)
294 REC, S. AUST. MUS,, 18 (14): 285-326
teriorly. Chelicerae bases 74um long to tip of cheli-
ceral blades, by 55m across conjoined. Cheliceral
blades small, curved, sharp-tipped, with small teeth
along cutting edge and other surfaces. Galeala spini-
form, robust, curved, simple, slightly blade-like, ter-
minally pointed, 17um long. A delicate circular lip
surrounds the tip of the chelicerae. Anterior hypos-
tomala not identified. Posterior hypostomala very
slender, tapering, unciliated, 30um long.
Palpi as figured. Palpal setal formula 0, 1, 1, 3, 9.
Palpal femorala tapering, with one barbed ciliation,
37um long. Palpal genuala tapering, pointed, uncil-
iated, 26um long. Palpal tarsal setae as figured. Pal-
pal tibial claw (odontus) with three strong slightly
divergent tines. Palpal supracoxala a slender blunted
peg, 4um long.
SOURCE OF Chyzeria hirsti LARVAE
Larvae of Chyzeria hirsti have been obtained on
three occasions since 1938 by experimental rearing
from the adults confined in tubes of soil.
(1) Serial ACB13, 14. Two adults were captured
by the author on a hillside above the property of
Birksgate near Glen Osmond, South Australia, on 23
May 1938. These mites were placed in a glass tube
with a small amount of soil from their capture site.
Local natural unsterilized soil* was used, as with all
my similar attempts with many different trombidiids,
on the hypothesis that the mites would find food in
the form of fungi or small arthropods in the soil.
Subsequent notes (abbreviated) were as follows.
13.vi.1938 Both (mites) active. One active and
plump, the other smaller and less plump.
2.vii.1938 Both active and well.
10.vii.1938 As 2.vii.1938.
24.vii.1938 Alive and active. Some fresh [unster-
ilized] soil added.
14.viii.1938 Alive and active.
10.ix.1938 Both active on stimulation. One thin,
one plump. One oribatid (mite) and one parasitid
(mite were) seen in the tube. There were a num-
ber of larval trombid (iid)s seen in the tube. Six
were mounted (on a slide). One (further) one
was lost. The others (were) kept in the tube. The
adults had larvae on their backs, but most of the
larvae were free.
12.ix.1938 One larva put into formalin.
13.ix.1938 Adults alive and active. Not less than
three larval trombid(iid)s were free, running
* The statement by Womersley (1939, p. 156) that the soil was
sterilized was an error on his part.
June, 1982
around inside the tube. One Chyzeria adult had
two larvae on the dorsum; the other adult had
four larvae on the dorsum. The larvae were not
attached by their mouthparts. They ran over the
bodies of their parents, without leaving them. [I
obviously assumed at the time, presumably from
the larval behaviour, that both of the adults were
parents of the mites, although in retrospect that
conclusion may not have been justified.]
(On examination of the slide-mounted adults
one finds that one specimen (ACB13/14A) is
clearly a female, the body being clarified in the
mountant to show it contains a slightly irregular
ovoid egg measuring 295um by 260um. No evi-
dence of internal chitinization in the egg is visible;
a more definite statement cannot be made on
account of the thickness of the setation. In the
case of the other adult (ACB13/14B) the sex is
indeterminate, as the mite’s idiosomal structure
is obscured by attached debris, and no eggs can
be seen; the genitalia are also obscured.)
So there were at least 17 larvae in all (6
mounted on slide initially, one lost 10.1x.1938,
one put in formalin 12.ix.1938, and not less than
9 in the tube),
14.ix.1938 Adults active. Several larvae on dorsum
of each adult. None [was] attached by its mouth-
parts, but all were moving over the surface of
the adult, and keeping to the posterior half of
the adult for the most part. When on the dorsum
of the adults the larvae moved one or two legs
at a time, and quickly, with intervals in between
so they moved forward jerkily.
Several larvae were seen running round [in]
the tube.
One larva was seen to leave the adult by a
leg, and to get several mm [away] from the
adult, and then return to the dorsum by a leg.
(Possibly the larvae reconnoitre [using] the adults
as bases.). One larva was seen dead in the tube
(lost [on] 17.ix.1938).
15.ix.1938 Adults active; one with 4, other with 3
or more larvae on it. None [was] attached by
[its] mouthparts. Two larvae where seen free in
the tube.
17.ix.1938 Two [larvae] were taken out (returned
later) and put on my arm. They were watched
with a strong lens, but neither showed any signs
of wanting to pierce the skin. Each was watched
for about three minutes. They ran quickly over
the skin.
22.ix.1938 Adults active, each with one larva on
the posterior part of the dorsum. Larvae not
attached by mouthparts, moving as before. Four
OBSERVATIONS ON CHYZERLA GANESTRINI AND SOME RELATED GENERA
larvae seen running around tube. One larva seen
dead in the tube.
Observations continued over the succeeding wecks.
By 24 September 1938 all the larvae were dead,
possibly by the tube being made dryer. The tube was
then re-wetted. On & October 1938 the adults were
active, On 22 October they were shrunken and feeble,
and on 29 Octuber were dead. On being slide-mounted
neither was then seen to contain eggs, nor were eggs
seen al any stage in the tube,
(2) Serial ACB322
On | August 1948 a very plump adult Chyzeria
was captured in soil at Workanda Creek, National
Park, Belair, South Australia. It was placed in a iube
with a little soil. Although examined regularly during
the period August to November no epes or larvae
were seen in the tube. On 7 December 1948 two dead
larvae were seen in the tube. The adult mite was
healthy on 28 December but was dead on 28 January
1949,
No. eggs or live larvae were observed in the tube
al any stage.
(3) Serial ACB468
An adult Chypzeria hirsti was captured al the same
site on 3 September, 1950, placed in a tube with
some damp soil, and examined as opportunity offered,
On 29 October | recorded “Worm in tube. One yellow
Xeve in tube, Tube quite damp’. On 14 November
seven larvae were counted in the tube, several being
immobile, trapped in water droplets, The yellow object
noted on 29 October remained unaltered in appear-
ance, and I recorded in my notes “I do not doubt
[that] it has nothing to do with the CAyzeria. To my
mind this tube experiment establishes the viviparity
of Chyzeria,*”
One active larva was then taken out of the tube
and manipulated into repeated encounters with the
adult, these manoeuvres being aided with a fine
brush, Although placed on the back of the adult on
three or four occasions, the larva showed no indication
to remain there, ut once hurrying off. | commented
in my notes that the larva looked “in fact like a
typical larval Trombicula”’ (the term Trombienla
“(When taken in conjunetion with the previous observations).
295
indicating here a larval trombiculid mite of the genus
Eutrombicula and various other genera), On being
replaced in the tube, further encounters occurred
between the adult and the larva, but the larva made
no attempts to climb on its presumed parent's back.
The trapped larvae were in a row as though they had
been recenily laid in a regular fashion, the distance
beiween successive larvae being about 5 or 6 times
the length of an individual larva.
On 15 November a few larvae were still alive and
healthy, but again no altempt for one to climb on the
back of the adult was observed. By 4 December all
larvae were dead, The adult appeared active and
healthy. However, by | January the adult also was
dead.
Thus in this experiment no phoretic relationships
were Observed.
(4) Serial ACB526
On 29 July, 1951 another adult Chyzeria {rom the
same site was captured and confined in a tube with
some soil. Observations were made at intervals. On
9 September no egys or larvae were seen in the tube,
At the next observation, on 24 October, the adult
was recorded as being well, the tube damp. “One
larva is present in the tube. It gives the impression
of walking on liptoes more than the larva of Eremiil-
leria* ete.—in this it resembles Trombicula cte, |
watched jt encounter its parent several times. At one
of these encounters if ran up its parent's leg, over its
back and down another leg, then circled widely and
returned to the moving parent and walked underneath
it. Tt appears to be attracted by movement.....Only
this one larva (was) seen; no egg seen.”
On 20 November the tube was rather dry; the
adult alive and well. Two dead larvae were seen in
the tube.
On 25 November the tube was dry; the adult alive
and well,
The adult remained alive until 29 December, bul
was dead on 27 January, 1952. Only one larva was
enventually recovered from the tube.
The time relationships between the adults and the
larvac in this experiment are summarized in Table 4.
*The larvae of Echinothrombium willungae (Hirst, 1931); see also
u note in Southcott (19574; p, 142),
TABLE 4. SUMMARY OF DATA ON TIME-RELATIONSHIPS OF ADULTS AND LARVAE IN SUCCESSFUL REARING EXPERIMENTS WITH
Chyceria hirsti WOM
Experiment ACB 13,14 ACRI22 ACB468 ACBS22
Adult(s) captured 23.v.1938 Lyi, i948 3.x, 1950 Wyn 19St
Larvate) seen alive {0-22 in. 1938 = 14-15.41.1950 D4.x,195]
Lurva first seen dead 14.1. 1998 T xii 193% 15.47 1950 DOKL IMSL
All larvae deud 23-24.in_ 1938 (7 xi 1948) (G.xi, (950+ 20.81, 1954
4.xii, L950,
Adult(s) died DA-29.x, 1938 29x11, 1948- Sth PYS0- Myxis, 195) -
28.1, 1949 (1951 27.3, 1952
ee See
296
In summary, larvae have appeared on four occa-
sions in tubes containing live adults of Chyzeria hirsti
confined therein, with unsterile soil as a rearing cham-
ber. Eggs have not been observed. Larvae have
appeared alive between September and November
and possibly are restricted mainly to the period Sep-
tember-October. No larva has been captured in the
field, and at present these larvae are the only ones
known of Chyzeria hirsti. No evidence of any poten-
tial host for these presumably parasitic larvae has
been discovered. The adults are used by the larvae in
a phoretic relationship, and there has been no evi-
dence of parasitisation of the parent. Man does not
appear to be a suitable host for the larva, from a
single experiment. (This was expected; it is antici-
pated that eventually the larvae will be found to
parasitise some arthropod host. See also the record
for Chyzeria derricki sp.nov., below of parasitisation
by this species of a tettigoniid host, and also the
record for Chyzeria onychia (Wom.), in which this
species was taken parasitic upon an adult Chyzeria
sp.).
COMMENT ON LARVAL BEHAVIOUR IN Chyzeria hirsti
Although over the years 1938-1980 continued
efforts have been made, as opportunity offered, to
obtain Chyzeria hirsti (and other Trombidiidae) lar-
vae from experimental preparations, the only suc-
cessful attempts with Chyzeria hirsti have been those
recorded above.
In two of the experiments recorded there was evi-
dence of behavioural interaction between the larvae
and the adult(s). In one further instance the obser-
vations were negative, while in the fourth experiment
the larvae were dead when first observed.
There appears to be no doubt, however, that the
larvae of Chyzeria hirsti have an unusual behaviour
among Acarina, in that they have a phoretic relation-
ship with their parents or parent. The evidence given
above clearly indicates that the larvae use the adults
as a means of transportation, and hence dispersion,
this coming within the formal definition of phoresy.
No doubt, in addition, the adults provide shelter and
some degree of protection, in that being able to
retreat to an elevated niche upon a parent represents
some protection from predatory arthropods of a size
capable of preying upon animals the size of the Chy-
zeria larva but not of the adult. This extends the
relationship between the parent and the larva beyond
transportation-utilization or phoresy, into one of pro-
tection. Similar extended relationships occur in other
arachnids, perhaps the best known ones being in the
case of scorpions and lycosid spiders, but such rela-
tionships occur widely among various groups of
arthropods, particularly the Crustacea, and in fact
even more widely and extensively in vertebrates. Thus
not only is this seen frequently among Mammalia,
REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (14): 285-326
June, 1982
but is well-known among Amphibia, and in fact the
carrying of juveniles in the mouth or a brood-pouch
is also known widely among the fishes.
Among the Acarina, however, although phoretic
relationships between mites of a number of families
and other arthropods are well-known (see Krantz,
1978), as far as I am aware there has been no previous
record among the Acarina of phoretic behaviour
occurring between an adult mite and the larva of the
same species.
The observations above on maternal care of the
larvae help to provide also some explanation for the
peculiar structure of at least two species of Chyzeria.
The dorsum of the idiosoma of the adult carries a
number of largely peripheral projections. The area
between these projections, in C. australiensise and
C. hirsti, bears a dense mat of fine, convoluted, simple
hairs.
In a recent paper Rovner et al. (1973) have sug-
gested a possible role for the abdominal setation of
the lycosid spiders in terms of maternal-juvenile
behaviour. Adult female lycosids have peculiar
knobbed hairs on the abdomen. Juveniles will not
cling to their mother’s abdomen once these hairs have
been shaved.
Since the Chyzeria hirsti there is an unusual
behaviour pattern in the larvae and an unusual struc-
tural modification of an area of the adult, where the
unusual larval behaviour is manifested, it would be
reasonable to interpret the adult structure as possibly
subserving the larval-adult behavioural modes.
Although in larval Chyzeria the anterior and posterior
(neolateral) pedotarsal claws are provided terminally
with a ‘suction’ membrane, this adaptation cannot
necessarily be considered as related to the adult-larva
behaviour, but could possibly serve some other func-
tion, such as ensuring adhesion to a thick-skinned
host.
It is also reasonable to speculate that the fine
convoluted hairs of the adult allow utilization by the
larva in its rather jerky mode of progression over the
idiosoma. The convoluted hairs appear to be of uni-
form thickness and unciliated, even when viewed
either by phase-contrast or polarized-light micros-
copy. The shaft (scobillum) outer layer is birefringent,
as is usual for any trombidiform normal-type seta
(scobala) (see Southcott 1961b, 1963a for details of
seta terminology). The undulations or coils (and the
terminal hook) on these hairs could serve the same
function as e.g. special knobs (as is the case in the
lycosid spiders mentioned above) i.e. allowing the
larvae better to utilize them in walking or moving
across the adult’s back. For these setae the name
sericala is proposed,
These setae are present in both CAyzeria austral-
OBSERVATIONS. ON CHYZERIA GANESTRINI AND SOME RELATED GENERA 747
iensis and C. hirsti. They are present in some other
species of Australian Chyzerla with various specific
determinations by Womersley, in the South Austra-
lian Museum collection. These inclide specimens
from Tasmania, Victoria (bul not all) and Queens-
land. They are nol present in three specimens in the
collection identified as C. musgravei Hirst by Wom-
ersley. (I have not seen the type of C. musgrave/.).
These three specimens instead possess in the central
dorsal idiosomal space a number of stiff sword-like
setae, arising from small plaques (seta-hases}, as well
as longer, Mexible, ciliated setae, arising similarly.
Details of these three specimens are as. follows:
(1) ACB715. One specimen. Top of Carrington
Drive, Natfional] Pfar]k, N.S,W., 31.%.1944, H.
W [omersley]..
(2) ACB716, Queensland, 1943, No other data.
(3) ACB717 (Two slides) One specimen. In leaf
debris, Brookfield Rd., nr Haven Rd. Brookfield,
5.iv,1961, E. H. Derri [c] k [Queensland].
Other Possible Phoretic Usage of Chy'zeria hirsti
Adult
A further usage of an adult Chyzerfu as a phoretic
host has been observed, In that case an adult female
of Chyzeria firsti, collected at Workanda Creek,
National Park, Belair, South Australia, on | August
194%. was observed to be carrying an adult female
pygmephorid mite. For further details, soe p, 318, and
Fig. 18 in this paper.
NOTES ON THE ADULT OF Chyzeria hirsti WOMERSLEY
As stated above, Womersley separaled this form as
a subspecies in 1934. In his discussion on Chyzeria
australiense (sic), C. occidentalis Hirst, 1929 and C-.
musgravei Hirst, 1928 Womersley (p. 182) included
the following remarks (after reducing C. occidentalis
to a ‘variety’ of ©. australiense (sic) Hirst, 1928)
‘Further, Hirst's C. musgravei must. also be consid-
ered as a variety differing in that the anterior median
plate (this is an error for ‘process’ of
‘tuberosity"—R, V.S,) is developed into a compartively
long process, One specimen amongst the Hirst mate-
rial in Professor Harvey Johnstan’s keeping, and now
in the South Australian Museum, is clearly interme-
diate between the two forms in respect of this char-
acter, the process being shorter and triangular. This
specimen was labelled in pencil by Hirst as C, mus-
gravel. All the specimens collected recently by Mr
M, W. Mules and myself in the Adelaide District
agree with this intermediate form, for which the name
C. australiense yar. hirsti var. nov. is proposed.
‘Loc. Type; Willunga, West, Aust. paratypes:
Woodside, S. Aust., July, 1933 (W.M.); Mt Osmond,
8S. Aust., Sept. 17, 1933 (H-W.),; Glen Osmond, S.
Aust., Oct. 1, 1933 (H-W.)”
Womersley also provided (pp. 183+4) a key to the
Australian and New Zealand species of Chyzeria in
which the ahove differences were restated in separating
C. australiense (sic) var. musgrayei from C. austral-
iense (sic) var, hirsti, The New Zealand species ©,
novaezcadlandiae Hirst, 1924 was misnamed as €-
novae-hollandiae Hirst by Womersley, who was thet
comparatively unfamiliar with the Australian fauna
and history,
Although the characters proposed by Womersley
(1934) in the separation of this taxon as a Subspecies,
and presented by him in the text and the key to the
species, appear comparatively slight, the present
author believes (hai Airsti is worthy of full specific
rank and therefore formally raises i to species status
now, Again, although this paper docs not aim to deal
with the classification of the adult Chyzeri/a, some
redescription of adult Chycerla hirsti and comparison
with Chyzeria australrensis Hirst are required.
DESCRIPTION OF THE HOLOTYPE ADULT OF Chyrera
hirsti’ WOMERSLEY, 1934 (FIGS. 3;.4 A-D)
The specimen (identification ACB718) is slide-
mounted in clear unstained medium, cleared, deco-
lorized, squashed and disrupted, possibly partly dis-
sected, so that it is difficult to give other than impre-
cise details of the soft parts. Scattered around the
mounted specimen are a number of eggs and skins,
without evidence of contained embryos (at least there
is no evidence of internal chitinization). The disrup-
lion of the animal on the slide is such that it is almost
divided into two parts by a line of tedring behind the
coxae Il, and there is a further oblique tear in ihe
opisthosoma (Fig.. 3).
Mite appears to be of normal CAyzeria shape and
charucteristics, with moderately strong legs and gna-
thosoma,, and a somewhat elongate idiosoma with the
usual processes. Legs [ and [V are about equal in
length to the idiosoma, with legs I] and [11] somewhat
shorter,
Length of animal on slide from tip of chelicera to
lip of posterior idiosomal processes 2900 um. (The
length in life is estimated from the degree of damage
to the specimen as about two-thirds of this figure, i.e,
ca 1900-2000 ym. Length of idiosoma in the mount
1950 wm, width (at widest part, including edges of
dorsal processes) 900 pm.
Eyes 2 + 2, sessile, anterior eye 42 ym across,
posterior eye larger, 56 um across, rather more
medial; the two cyes making 4 conjoined mass 116 urn
by 57 um. In the mid-line, somewhat anterior to the
eyes, is a pair of prominent tubercles, each about
46 wm across and high. From each of these sensilla
a fine sensillary hair emerges, about 240 um long.
Between the eye masses and the sensillary tubercles
is the “sensillary area”, which bears about 20 long
cilated setae. A few similar setae arise also along the
298 REC. 8. AUST. MUS., 18 (14); 285-326 June, 1982
J
SS
.
Oe
~o8
FIG. 3. Chyzeria hirsti Womersley, adult. Holotype female, spec-
imen ACB718, shown in transparency (genitalia and anus
omitted), The body and leg setae are mostly omitted. The
specimen has been ruptured in the mounting process, and ova
of various sizes have been released.
OBSERVATIONS ON CHYZERI4 GANESTRINI AND SOME RELATED GENERA
medial edges of each eye mass. There is a weak
indication of a crista running posteriorly from the
sensillary area for about 360 wm; this is thin and has
an irregular margin, becoming vaguer and weaker
posteriorad,
Dorsum of the idiosoma with the characteristic
digitations of projections of the genus. The antero-
median is rather conical, but not well-defined. These
projections are all studded with little bosses carrying
the setal plates. They carry two kinds of setae (scob-
alae), the more prominent. kind being the stiff spine-
like unciliated setae, which project out like spines of
a hedgehog, and range from 86-260 um long. Among
the spine-like scobalae are a number of more norrnal,
slender, cilated setae, which project out beyond the
spine-like setae, The anterolateral and posicrolateral
processes are long, more or less round-ended and
hence sausage-shaped. In between them are less
prominent projections, so that along each side of the
dorsum of the idiosoma is a column of five more or
less distinct projections. The second and third proc-
exses project the least, bul are still distinct. The two
Most posterior projections are bulbous. There appears
also to be a posteromedial projection, probably some-
what ventrally placed, but as in the specimen it is
detached and displaced away from the idiosoma
between the two most posteriar projections, its exact
placing is not determinable in this specimen.
In the central area of the dorsum: of the idiosoma
is 4 large number of long fine convoluted hairs, each
rising fram an expanded seta-base, forming a small
plate, These setae are simple, terminally pointed, but
so heavily convoluted that it is difficult to estimate
their length; the degree of convolution also tends to
give a false eslimate of their numbers. (See Fig. 4C).
Among them are a few of the long spine-lke setae.
Venter of idiosoma is provided with numerous short
ciliated hairs, without any spine-like or sword-like
setae. Genital valves appear normal, wilh the usual
3 + 3 oval or circular “suckers'; the degree of dis-
ruption of the specimen precludes further detail being
given,
Legs fairly robust (see Fig. 3); lengths (trochanter
proximally to tip of tarsus, without claws) I 2.000 um,
Il 1405, UL 1465, IV | 905. Tarsal claws appear
normal, For leg segmental measurements see Table
5 (below),
Gnathosoma as figured. Cheliccrae appear normal,
but not visible in lateral view, as the right chelicera
is at least partly missing (?dissected away). Palp
robust Palpal tibial claw strong, with a strong acces-
sory claw immedialely behind it, reaching to about
24 its length; another accessory claw behind that also.
These two accessory claws are the most distal mem-
bers of a comb of about 12 spines along the lateral
299
face of the palpal tibia. Similar spines are spread
over the lateral face of the palpal tibia, without any
regularity of arrangement. (Note: the customary term
spine is used here, although these projections are not
true spines, but are highly modified normal-type
setae, 1.e. scobalae.) Palpal tarsus ovoid, shorter than
the tibial claw, well-covered with setae, these being
longest peripherally, so that these setac extend ta
reach the level of the tip of the palptibia.
The eggs on the slide are round to oval, or ruptured.
The size 1s quite variable, ranging from about 380 wm
x 345 um, down to 120 um x 120 um; an average
dimension is perhaps 240 um x 185 win.
SITE OF ORIGIN OF THE TYPE OF C. Airsti
Some clarification is required of the details of the
origin of the specimen.
The specimen of an adult in the South Australian
Museum collection is labelled TYPE in red ink in
Womersley’s writing. Other daia on the sole slide
label are “Wondside. SA, July, 1933 M. W. Mules’.
The determination of Womersley's. on the label 1s
‘Chyzeria australiense Hirst y. hirsti an, v | have
added ‘ACB718".
Wamersley (1934, p. 182) stated (hat the Type
came from “Willunga, West. Aust.’, and lists the
Woodside specimen among the paratypes. This is
clearly an error by Womersley, as the slide of the
Woodside specimen js clearly and unequivocally
labelled, and the four slides containing material from
‘Willunga, W. A. have no marking indicating thal
they were ever considered as type material. The four
Willunga slides represent only one specimen, which
Womersley had partially dissected. | have lubelled
these four slides ACB677A-D, for future reference.
Although the slides give no date or name of collector
on their present labels, which are in Womersley’s
writing. one slide (A677B. of a palp) has written upon
it (labelled as C, misgravei by S, H.’, this indicating
it was af Hirst’s collecting and original identification.
No evidence of the original label of Hirst remains.
As each slide bears the notation “Chyzeria austral-
tease Hirst v, hirsei n, v,” (or some abbreviation of
this) it is clear that this specimen is to be correctly
desiznated a Paratype.
Slide ACB677D has written upon the label, in
Womersley’s writing ‘Willunga. W_A./ no date/ from
Univ. Coll./', indicating that this was one of the
specimens deposited by Professor T, Harvey lohnston
in the South Australian Museum, from the Depari-
ment of Zoology, University of Adelaide.
Hirst had worked in ihe Zoology Department while
Professor Johnston was ubsent in the Antarctic with
the British Australian and New Zealand Antarctic
300 REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (14): 285-326 June, 1982
0
100
500
um
SAS —
0 ‘
0
100
um 100
FIG. 4. Chyzeria hirsti Womersley, adult. Details of holotype
female specimen ACB718. A, Dorsal idiosomal sensilla, eyes
and neighbouring structures. B, Left palp, in lateral view, and
right chelicera. The left chelicera is missing. The proximal
part of the right palp is also shown. C, Setation of the central
dorsal part of the idiosoma, showing the fine convoluted seri-
calae, and a few of the sword-like setae. D, The most posterior
of the right lateral column of dorsal idiosomal processes,
showing the two types of setae present. (All figures to adjacent
scales.).
OBSERVATIONS ON CHYZERIA GANESTRINI AND SOME RELATED GENERA 301
Expedition of 1929/1931, but unfortunately commit-
ted suicide on the return voyage to England, Hirst
had collected at various sites in South Australia and
eastern Australia, one of his species in fact being
named Microtrombidium willungae Hirst, 1931* col-
lected by Hirst at Willunga, South Australia, October
1929.
Reference to the Gazeteer of the United States
Board on Geographic Names, Number 40 (Australia)
shows that the name Willunga occurs only in South
Australia, in the forms of Willunga and Willunga
Hill, which are in fact contiguous, the former being
a township, Both are at 35°17’S lat.; the former al
138°33’E and the latter al 138°34’E long. Womersley
arrived in South Australia only in 1933, and at the
time was not familiar with South Australian place
names (see Southcott, 1963b),
Chyzeria australiense (sic) was described by Hirst
in 1928 (1928a, p. 563) from “Swan River, W.A. In
nest of Ponera lutea.”'
In the South Australian Museum collection are
four relevant slides labelled as originating from Swan
River, W[estern] A[ustralia]. Three of them bear a
label in Hirst's writing, while one bears a label by
Womersley, These represent the TYPE and a Para-
type. | have attached identifying numbers ACB719
and ACB720 to these specimens as follows:
ACB719, Intact specimen mounted in well-slide,
labelled in what | interpret as Hirst’s writing
“Chyzerla — australiense HIRST/Swan
River/W.A./S.A. Mus. Coll./ Nest of Ponera
lutea”
ACB720, A series of three slides, to which [ have
attached the identifying numbers ACB720A, B
and C, as follows:
ACB720A: Heavily dissected specimen, mounted in
well-slide, labelled in same writing as preceding
“Chyzerla australiense HIRST/Swan
River/W.A./S.A, Mus. Coll,/Palp”, the term
“Palp” being crossed out in pencil.
a Ettmuelleria willungae (Hirst); see Southcott 1957a, p.
ACB720B: Slide containing the end of a first leg of
a trombidiid mite, of three segments, labelled as
for preceding slide, but with “Ist Leg” replacing
the term “Palp", Reference to slide ACB720A
shows that three segments are missing from the
left first leg.
ACB720C; Slide bearing a label in Womersley's writ-
ing “Chyzeria australiense Hirst/Palp/ in nest
of Ponera lutea / Swan Riv. W.A./S.A.M. coll.”
and has also the word “TYPE” written on it in
red ink, in Womersley’s writing. This palp
appears to have been the source of Womersley's
(1934) Fig. 2.
There is no doubt that specimen ACB719 is the
Holotype of Chpzeria ausiraliensis Hirst, from the
red slide notation of “Type”, in a writing that does
not appear to have been Womersley’s, and is
presumably Hirst’s. I have attached an additional
label to the slide, identifying it as ACB719, and with
the word “TYPE”, This specimen was not figured by
Hirst, but was apparently the source of Womersley’s
(1934) Fig, |, (The specimen has the palpi flexed,
and not extended as figured by Womersley. Other-
wise, however, there appears to be a general agree-
ment with the figure.)
The three slides | have labelled ACB720 appear to
make up a single specimen, and | have labelled these
ACB720A, B and C with additional slide labels, and
have added to each the word “PARATYPE”. I regard
Womersley’s use of the word “TYPE” on slide
ACB720C as either frankly erroneous, or as a loose
indication that the specimen belonged to the lype
series. | do not know whether there were originally
two slides and a further mount was made by
Womersley, or whether there were originally three,
the label of one being discarded by Womersley in
1933-4.
SOME FURTHER DATA AND COMPARISONS FOR
ADULTS OF Chyzeria hirsti WOMERSLEY AND Chyzeria
australiensis HIRST.
Table 5 gives various measurements for the holo-
types of Chyzeria hirsti Womersley and Chyzerla
australiensis Hirst, as well as for some other speci-
mens of gach of these species.
302
Table 5.
REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (14): 285-326
June, 1982
Measurements (um) for some adults of Chyzeria hirsti Wom. and C. australiensis Hirst, including lengths of nominated leg
segments and their ratios, also the lengths of the posterior dorsal swordlike setae.
Chyzeria hirsti
Chyzeria australiensis
Holotype ? Paratype Holotype Paratype ACB721A ACB721B
Specimen ACB718 ACB677 ACB13/14A ACB13/14B ACB719 ACB720 Nyabing, Nyabing,
Woodside, Willunga, 2 Glen Os., Glen Os., Swan R., Swan R., W.A. 2.8.45 W.A. 2.8.45
S.A, S.A. S. Aust. S. Aust W.A. W.A. P.N.F. P.N.F.
Length Ratio Length Ratio Length Ratio Length Ratio|Length Ratio Length Ratio Length Ratio Length Ratio
Segment
Ta | 605 1.00 583 1.00 572 1.00 562 1.00] 482 1.00 482 1.00 580 1.00 576 1.00
Ti | 382 63 367 63 396 69 396 10 | 360 15 396 82 ©6418 712 396 69
Ge I 331 55 324 56 346 60 342 61 310 64 313 65 335 58 353 61
Ta Il 374 1.00 346 1.00 374 1.00 346 1.00} 346 1.00 342 1.00 382 1.00 367 1.00
Ti Il 295 79 259 75 288 17 295 85 | 288 83 288 84 335 88 324 88
Ta Ill 403 1.00 346 1.00 360 1.00 367 100} 353 1.00 363 1.00 382 1.00 385 1.00
Ti Ill 317 719 288 83 0 317 88 317 86 | 328 93 302 83 367 96 382 99
Ta IV 446 1.00 410 1.00 446 1.00 —* — 389 1.00 389 1.00 432 1.00 439 1.00
Ti IV 468 1.05 400 98 482 1.08 ca480* — 482 1.24 493 1.27 562 1.30 522 = 1.19
Posterior dorsal g9 994 88-172 120-195 144-172 86-135 80-143 72-152 86-138
swordlike setae
* Somewhat obscured in the mount, and cannot be measured accurately
Perusal of Table 5 suggests that some of the dimen- ASBa 44 143.0(!) 42
sions could be useful in separating the two species PSB 44 20.0(!) 42
australiensis and hirsti. Of them, the range of the L 88 163.0(!) 84
lengths of the posterior dorsal swordlike setae is the W 167 — —
most useful as the ranges differ considerably, with A-P 52, 52 55.0 50
their maxima ranging from 172-204 um for hirstiand AL 112 112.0 110
135-152 um for australiensis. PL 83 84.0 88
Sens cal80 168.0 162
: ; DS 103-173 163 102-174
Chyzeria onychia (Womersle F
if penta ) mid-DS 110-138 = —
(Figs. 5, 6, 7A-B, 8A-G, 9) PDS 112-138 — —
Synonymy
Grossia onychia Womersley, 1954 (1954a) p. 111;
Audy, 1954, p. 166; Audy 1957 p. 442; Vercam-
men-Grandjean 1972 p. 231.
Redescription of Holotype
Colour in life not recorded by collector G. F. Gross
or by Womersley. Slide-mounted specimen (it has not
been remounted by either Vercammen-Grandjean or
myself) has the idiosoma ca 1750 wm long by ca 1600
um wide; total length of animal from tip of chelicerae
to posterior pole of idiosoma ca 1900 um. (The spec-
imen has been severely compressed on the slide and
ruptured on mounting, hence these measurements are
likely to be significantly larger than the measure-
ments in life.)
The standard (and some other) data of the Holo-
type are as follows (and compared with data pub-
lished by Womersley and Vercammen-Grandjean):
This Womersley Vercammen-
paper (1954) Grandjean
(1972)
AW 96 100.0 97
PW 151 156.0 149
SB 67 73.0 65
Scutalae tapering, somewhat sinuous in the mount,
slightly blunted at tip, with weak, barbed, almost
adpressed ciliations.
Eyes 2 + 2, sessile, conjoined, the eye patch placed
well laterally to the dorsal shield, eyes of about the
same size, anterior more medial, circular, 16 wm
across, posterior oval, 15 um X 17 um.
Dorsal idiosomalae similar to scutalae, tapering,
slightly blunted at tip, with weak, barbed cilia; cilia
only a little outstanding from shaft. Dorsal idioso-
malae have their seta bases expanded to small plates
(see Fig. 8C, D).
Venter: no setae between coxae I, II and III. Behind
coxae III are a small number of opisthosomal ventra-
lae, arranged as figured. (The pattern that exists is
not clear on account of damage that has been done
to the specimen in mounting.) The setae are tapering,
pointed, somewhat (more or less adpressedly) ciliated,
40-77 wm long, the more posterior setae the longer
(these remarks excluding the most posterior setae of
the mount, whose dorsal:ventral relationship cannot
be determined from the mount).
Anal region: anus consists of two hinged valves or
plates, each 61 wm long by 20 um wide, hinged ante-
500
yim
ee)
OBSERVATIONS ON CHYZERIA GANESTRINI AND SOME RELATED GENERA 303
Q \
\_ p's
Sf Sa
=)
<Q
S36)
FIG. 5. Chyzeria onychia (Womersley). Holotype larva, dorsal
view, to scale on left. The specimen has been distorted and
ruptured by the mounting process. The anus and surrounding
setae cannot be clearly identified as dorsal or ventral in the
mount, hence these are repeated in Fig. 6.
a4 REC,
riarly and posteriorly to make a structure 44 ym
across in the mount, Each anal plate carries two stiff
normal setae, almost straight, tapering, slightly
blunted, anterior seta 40 um long, posterior 64 um.
Surrounding the anus is a group of setae similar to
last, pointed or slightly blunted. These opisthosomal
setae arise from small expanded plates. (The setation
over the posterior end of the idiosoma is contiguous
between the dorsum and venter, but in the mount its
exact posilion on the idiosoma cannot be determined).
Coxalae 2, 1, 1. Coxulae robust, lapering, some-
what spindle-shaped, curved, with a few adpressed
cilia, All coxalae appear to be similar, but in the
Speeinien only the left coxala HI] is intact, the others
being apparently broken, or missing. Coxala LI
38 wi long, terminally tapering to a fine point,
Legs as figured; | 560 xm long, 11 565 wm long, TI
645 pm (from medial point of each coxa to up of
claws). Fenvoral to tibial segments roughly cylindri-
cal, Tarsus | 129m long by 48 um high, tibia |
92 um long, genu | 80 wm (Til/Gel = 1.15). Tarsus
(ll 129 pm long by 34 wm Ingh, tibia ILE 109 pm
long, genu WT 85 pm (Till /Gelll = 1.29), (Tarsal
meisurements exclude claws and pedicle.)
Genu | has specialized seta VsGel.74pd. Tibia |
has specialized setae SoTil-27d, VsTil. 91pd,
SoTil.92d, Genu I has specialized seta VsGell.71 pd.
Tibia Il has specialized setae SoTill.23d and
SoTL s3pd. Tibia lll has specialized seta
SoTill.18d.
Tarsal setae as figured. Tarsal pedicles appear nor-
mul, Each tarsus is provided with three claws, The
middle (neomedian) claw is normal, strong, falciform.
Anterior claw reduced to a slender tapering sinuous
rod, with a spreading terminal adhesive membrane.
Posterior claw is somewhat more robust than the
anterior, and straighter, it terminates in a smaller
adhesive sucker Sel an angle to the preceding claw-
shaft.
Gnathosoma short, robust. Chelae bases 96 um long
by 48 wm across individually, the two combined being
96 um across. Chelie blades short, projecting 32 um
beyond the end of the chelae bases. Chelae bases
more or less pyriform. Blade with small scattered
retrorse teeth on all surfaces, but stronger laterally.
Galeala not identified. Anterior hypostomala taper-
ing, pointed with a few adpressed cilia, 45 um long.
Posterior hypostomala similar, 57 wm long,
Palpal formula 0, 1, 1, 3,9. Palpal femorala robust,
lapering, with strong barbs, 74 um long. Palpal gen-
uala strong, tapering, pointed, terminally filiform,
with barbed cilia, 70 um tong. Palpal tibial claw tri-
fid, the three tines tapering, strong, divergent, slightly
blunted. Additionally the palpal tibia carries a strong
S, AUST, MUS, 1H (14), 245-326
June, 1982
sickle-shaped accessory seta, with a tapering hook-
like end and a small tooth about the middle of its
ventral side; this possibly operates in apposilion ta
the tibial claw. Palpal tarsus as figured. Palpal supea-
coxala present, a slender conical seta 9 um long.
Locality
The specimen is known only from the Holotype,
The collector Dr G. F. Gross, has advised me (pers,
comm., 4 Augusi 1975) that he collected it at Tam-
bryn Junction, Otway Ranges, Victoria in January
1951, The specimen, which was parasilic upon an
adult Chpzerta, was probably brought back alive to
Womersley.
No Chpzerja adult is among the South Australian
Museum slide or spirit collection, with locality data
for the Otway Ranges, Victoria.
Remarks on Biology
Observations upon a phoretic relationship between
Chyzeria hirsti and its larvae have been recorded
earlier in this paper. When C, Ajrsti larvae were
reared in the laboratory, all larvae were small and
clearly unfed. In the case of C. onychia , the larva
is considerably enlarged, and in fact, judging by other
experiences of the author with trombidiid larvae, it
appears to be al a stage not far away from pupation,
even though recorded as attached parasitically, Lt
may seem remarkable that a larva of Chyzeria should
parasitize an adult of the same genus (and conceiv-
ably, of the same species), but among the family
Erythraeidae, in some species the larvae will parasi-
lize Opportunistically a wide range of hosts including
adult erythraeid and anystid mites (see Southcott,
1946 pp. 39, 41)..
Remarks on the Generic Status of Chyzeria onpchia
(Wom.)
There does not appear io be any good reason to
separate C. onvehia generically from the other mem-
bers of the genus Chyzeria (the whole of the known
larvae) considered in this paper, The body setae are
similar to those of other members referred to the
genus, and in fact are less aberrant than, e.g., the AL
seutalae of C, hirst/. The pedocoxalae are in fact the
Most normal in structure for any of the larvae con-
sidered in this paper. The tarsal claws of (he legs are
also quite similar to those of the other members of
the genus. Womersley's erection of Grossia appears
10 have been simply a consequence of his overlooking
his earlier (1939) paper, as remarked above.
Chyzevria flindersi sp. nov.
Fivs. 1OA, B: 1TA-B; 12
Description of Larva (from the Holotype specimen
ACB674)
OBSERVATIONS ON CHYZERIA GANESTRINI AND SOME RELATED GENERA 305
ne an
FIG. 6. Chyzeria onychia (Womersley). Holotype larva, ventral
view, to scale on left. Specimen distorted and ruptured (see
also legend to Fig. 5).
306
REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (14): 285-326 June, 1982
FIG. 7. Chyzeria onychia (Womersley). Holotype larva. A, Gna-
thosoma, dorsal view. B, Dorsal idiosomal scutum. (The right
AL scutala has been restored in the figure to its correct
position; its position on the slide is shown in outline.) (Both to
scale shown).
OBSERVATIONS ON CHYZERIA GANESTRINI AND SOME RELATED GENERA 307
100
FIG. 8. Chyzeria onychia (Womersley). Holotype larva. A, Gna-
thosoma, ventral view; the chelicera shown on the left is
damaged. B, Left eyes and right eyes. C, D, Dorsal idiosomal
setae. E, F, Ventral idiosomal setae. G, Anus and surrounding
setae. (All to scale shown,).
308 REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (14): 285-326 June, 1982
=~
p Cy,
1
wt .
gy a
Mi
gE
FIG. 9. Chyzeria onychia (Womersley). Holotype larva. Legs I,
II and III, to scale shown; to standard symbols, (Note: all legs
have been dislocated at the trochantero-femoral joints.). Pedo-
coxala III is also shown, further enlarged.
Colour in life red. Length of idiosoma (mounted on
slide) 410um, width 330 wm; total length of animal
from tip of chelicerae to posterior pole of idiosoma
527 wm.
Dorsal scutum as figured; much wider than long,
more or less oblong or trapezoidal, with concave
anterior and posterior margins, and irregularly convex
lateral margins. One pair of scutal sensilla, well sep-
arated, placed about halfway between the front and
back edges of scutum. AL scutalae at AL angles of
shield, PL somewhat anterior to PL angles.
The standard (and some other) data of the Holo-
type are (um):
AW
PW
139
184
A-P aa
AL 55
SB 93 PL 52
ASBa 57 Sens 96
ASBp 32 DS 52-77
L 89 Mid-DS 67-71
WwW 212 PDS 77
Scutalae normal, tapering, ciliated, slightly blunted
terminally. Scutal sensillary filaments slender, with
a few sparse cilia in distal half.
Eyes 2 + 2, sessile, anterior about 21 wm across,
lateral to the posterior part of the lateral edge of
scutum; posterior eye close behind anterior eye,
17 wm across.
Dorsal idiosomalae similar to scutalae, but more
slender, arranged in rows across dorsum 6, 6, 6, 4, 2,
2; total 26 setae. All dorsal idiosomalae arise from
expanded plates.
100
200
yum
OBSERVATIONS ON CHYZERIA GANESTRINI AND SOME RELATED GENERA 309
FIG. 10. Chyzeria flindersi sp. nov. Holotype larva. A, Dorsal
view, to scale on left; legs omitted beyond trochanters. B,
Dorsal idiosomal seta, further enlarged.
310
Venter: no setae between coxae I and II. Between
coxae III a pair of setae, with enlarged basal quarter
of scobillum, and from this enlarged basal part the
distal part arises abruptly, to taper to a smooth point;
setae 43, 47 um long, lacking cilia. Remaining ven-
tralae arise well behind coxae III, about 39 in num-
ber, and are 30-54 um long; they increase in length
posteriad. The more anterior setae are similar to the
pair between coxae III, except that they carry cilia,
these becoming stronger and more outstanding pos-
teriad. The most posterior ventralae tend to resemble
the adjoining dorsal setae.
Anal region not clearly visible in Holotype, but
appears normal. Anus about 47 um long.
Coxalae 2, 1, 1. All coxalae stout, blunted, with a
terminal slight grooving which makes them appear
like small plums projecting from the coxae, 15-17 um
long. Careful microscopy at high power shows an
appearance of distal tuberosities (see Fig. 11C),
Legs normal: I 700 um long, II 655 um, HI 735 um
(all lengths include coxae and claws). Femoral to
tibial segments more or less cylindrical. Femora
divided. Scobalae normal. Trochanteralae 1, 1, 1,
basifemoralae | (2), 2 (3), 1, telofemoralae 5, 4, 4.
Tarsus I 174 wm long by 50 um high; tibia I 108 wm
long, genu I 94 uv long (Til/Gel = 1.15). Tarsus III
176 wm long by 40 um across; tibia HI 119um long
genu IIT 94 wm long (TilI[/Gell] = 1.27). (All
tarsal lengths without claws and pedicle.)
Genu I has specialized seta VsGel.74pd. Tibia |
has specialized setae SoTil.23d, VsTil.88pd,
SoTil.92d (and hence the distal SoTil is distal to the
VsTil). Genu II has specialized seta VsGell.79pd.
Tibia Il has specialized setae SoTill.23pd and
SoTill.88pd. Tibia III has specialized seta
SoTil11.26d.
Tarsal setae as figured. Tarsal pedicles short.
Pedotarsal claws: anterior curved, slender, two thirds
as long as middle claw, with a terminal flattened
piece which is more or less at right angles to the
claw; middle (neomedian) claw falciform, strong,
unciliated; posterior claw curved, slender, shorter
than anterior claw, and with a similar flattened trans-
verse piece at the tip (see Fig. 12).
Gnathosoma robust, normal, pear-shaped, chelicera
122 um long to tip of cheliceral blade, by 108 um
across. Cheliceral blades strong, falciform, 44 um
long. In the Holotype (the only specimen available)
the left blade is quite smooth, while the right blade
bears ventrally a number of small retrorse adnate
teeth; the concave upper surface of the right fang has
7 small teeth, the left fang, none. Galeala spiniform,
curved, 33 um long. Anterior hypostomala short, peg-
like, 7 um long. Posterior hypostomala slender, ca
69 um long, unciliated.
REC. 8S. AUST, MUS., 18 (14): 285-326
June, 1982
Palpal formula 0, 1, 1, 3, 9. Palpal femorala taper-
ing, slightly ciliated, very slightly blunted, 52 um
long. Palpal genuala slender, unciliated, 71 um long.
Palpal tibial claw (odontus) with three strong, slightly
divergent prongs. Palpal tarsalae as figured. Palpal
supracoxala a blunted peg, 8 um long.
Locality
Tasmania: Lake St. Clair, 28 December 1945, R.
V. Southcott. One larva, ACB674, Holotype, running
up trunk of Eucalyptus sp., at about 1.5m above
ground. The site was in fairly open cleared ground,
near the shore of the Lake. Type to be deposited in
the South Australian Museum.
Nomenclature
This species is dedicated to Matthew Flinders, R.
N., 1774-1814, who was the first to survey the major
part of the Tasmanian coastline.
Remarks on Asymmetry in the Chelicerae
In the above description an asymmetry in structure
of the cheliceral fangs was recorded, one fang (the
presumably normal one) being denticulate, and the
other smooth. The present author is unaware of a
similar asymmetry of the mouthparts having been
recorded previously in at least the Trombidioidea, or
Erythraeoidea. Among the Erythraeoidea differences
in larval shield setation occur at times; for example,
see the discussion on this under the account of Char-
letonia venus Southcott in Southcott (1966, p. 709)
and for Charletonia feideri Southcott (see ibid., Fig.
32, p. 756, and the cases recorded under “Material
examined” on pp. 754-8). However, as these setae are
presumably responsible for only the sensory input,
and some degree of protection, minor abnormalities
are unlikely to be a major significance. Major struc-
tural abnormalities affecting e.g. locomotory capacity
or feeding ability, are more likely to be such a hand-
icap as to threaten survival, and hence are less likely
to be encountered in field-collected material.
The specimen was apparently unfed, and whether
the asymmetry recorded would be a handicap to
feeding is a matter of speculation.
Even among better known animals, major asym-
metry in external structures is comparitively rare.
Possibly gynandromorphy in insects and _ hetero-
chromia in mammals are comparable examples. In
some groups, notably the fiddler crabs, asymmetry
has become part of the genetic inheritance of the
group, and is either sex-linked, or hormonally related.
Chyzeria derricki sp. nov.
(Figs. 13A-H, 14A-B, 15)
Description of Larva (from the Holotype Larva
ACB633A)
OBSERVATIONS ON CHYZERIA GANESTRINI AND SOME RELATED GENERA 311
VIG. 11 Chyzerfa flindersi sp. nov, Holotype larva. A, Ventral
view, to scale on left; legs omitted beyond trochanters. B,
Ventral opisthosomal seta, further enlarged, C, Pedocoxal seta
(x in A), further enlarged. D, Palp tarsus, further enlarged.
REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (14): 285-326
June, 1982
FIG. 12 Chyzeria flindersi sp. nov, Holotype larva. Legs 1, 1] and
LIT, to scale on left; to standard symbols,
Colour in life not recorded, presumably red. Length
of idiosoma (mounted on slide) 1055 um, width 610
um. Idiosoma rather elongate, slightly constricted
behind level of coxae II, and somewhat pointed at
posterior pole. Total length of animal from tip of
galeal seta to posterior pole of idiosoma 1165um
(chelicerae damaged in Holotype, and fangs missing;
Paratype ACB 633B lacks gnathosoma, etc.).
Dorsal scutum more or less trapezoidal, with
rounded angles, wider posteriorly; anterior and pos-
terior edges slightly sinuous (scutum tends to project
a little in the middle posteriorly). Scutum is lightly
punctate, particularly in its anterior and more central
part, in the area between the sensilla and the AL
scutalae. Scutal sensilla normal, the setae with slight,
sparse, terminal cilia. Scutalae tapering, pointed, slen-
der, lightly blunted at tip, with adpressed cilia.
The standard (and some other) data of the Holo-
type (A) and the Paratype (B) are:
A B A B
AW 102 99 A-P 56,54 53,57
PW 152 152 AL 88 (7+) 107
SB 61 61 PL 88 94,89
ASB 55 55 Sens 153 -—
OBSERVATIONS ON CHYZERIA GANESTRINI AND SOME RELATED GENERA 313
0
500 : ge N PAG IO TT 4
um . ; ?
eh,
0
100
um
FIG. 13. Chyzeria derricki sp. nov. Holotype larva. A, Dorsal
aspect, legs omitted beyond trochanters. B, Ventral aspect,
legs omitted beyond trochanters. C, D, E, Dorsal idiosomal
setae: C, anterior dorsal idiosomala; D, mid-dorsal idiosomala;
E, posterior dorsal idiosomala. F, G, ventral idiosomal setae:
F, anterior opisthosomala, G more posterior ventral opistho-
somala, H, Anal region of venter. (A, B to top scale; C-H to
bottom scale.)
314
A B A B
PSB 37 39 DS 85-120 74-120
I, 92 94 ADS 83-118 77-114
W 178 180 MDS 93-98 74-96
PDS 85-120 79-120
PVS 96-114 42-744
Eyes 2 + 2, sessile, subequal, circular, conjoined,
antero-posterior in orientation, lenses 26 um across.
Dorsal idiosomalae long, tapering, curved, with
adpressed cilia, and slightly blunted at the tip;
arranged 6, 6, 6, 6, 4, 2. Each seta arises, usually
eccentrically, from a small plate, suboval, an expan-
sion of a normal alveolar annulus.
Venter: No setae between coxae I or coxae II,
Somewhat anterior to level of coxae III is a pair of
tapering, pointed, simple setae, 57 wm long. Behind
coxae III is a patch of about 40 similar setae which
arise from small plates that increase gradually in size
posteriad, with the more posterior setae the longer.
The chitinized shaft (scobillum) of the seta also
becomes thicker at its proximal end, as one proceeds
posteriorad. Anus externally consists of two hinged
valves or plates, with a longitudinal opening, the
conjoined two making an oval structure 55 um long
by 49 um wide. Each valve has two setae, tapering,
slightly blunted, with adpressed cilia; anterior 48 wm
long, posterior 74 um.
Coxalae 2, 2, 1. All coxalae short, blunted, smooth
except for faint distal tubercles (see Figs. 14B, 15).
coxalae 15-20 um long.
Legs comparatively long and thin for a trombidiid
larva, compared with body size; tarsi long and ter-
minally attenuated. Leg lengths: I 705 um, II 655 um,
III 795 um (all lengths include coxae and claws).
Femora divided. Femoral to tibial segments more or
less cylindrical. Scobalae of legs tapering, with
barbed cilia, and are terminally blunted. Scobalae of
telofemora and tibiae tend to be long and particularly
outstanding.
Tarsus I 224ym long by 36um high. Tibia |
118 wm long, genu I 112 um long (Til/Gel = 1.05).
Tarsus III] 210 wm long by 24 um high (at proximal
end). Tibia III 141 um long, genu III 106 um long
(TillI/Gelll = 1.33). (All tarsal lengths exclude
claws and pedicle.)
Genu | with specialized seta VsGel.82pd. Tibia I
with specialized setae SoTil.10d, SoTil.91d and
VsTil.92pd. Genu II with specialized seta
VsGell.81pd. Tibia II with specialized setae
SoTill.20d, SoTil[.90d. Genu II] without specialized
setae. Tibia II] with SoTilll.16d.
Tarsal setae as figured. Pedotarsal claws three in
number: anterior slender, falciform with ill-defined
REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (14): 285-326
June, 1982
terminal spreading suction pad; middle claw falci-
form, over-reaching others; posterior slender, sinuous,
with obliquely placed terminal suction pad.
Gnathosoma short, robust. Conjoined cheliceral
bases form a squat pyriform mass 110 um long (to
anteriormost chitinization, except setae) by 105 um
wide. Cheliceral blades missing in Type and Paratype.
Galeala normal, pointed, tapering with filiform tip,
32 wm long. Anterior hypostomala not available. Pos-
terior hypostomala long, fine, pointed, simple, about
100 wm long. Palpal setal formula 0, 1, 1, 3, 29.
Palpal femorala tapering, terminally blunted, with
outstanding sparse cilia, 123 um long. Palpal genuala
tapering, pointed, unciliated, 96 wm long. Palpal tibi-
alae tapering, pointed. Palpal tibial claw trifid, the
three curved tines strongly divergent (see Fig. 14B).
Palpal tarsalae as figured, including one relatively
huge scythe-like seta, which reaches as far back as
the bases of the posterior hypostomalae. Palpal supra-
coxala short, narrow, pointed, 5 um long.
Locality
Queensland: Mt Tamborine, 23 February 1954, E.
H. Derrick, two specimens taken parasitic upon uni-
dentified tettigoniid grasshopper (identification A294).
Holotype ACB633A, Paratype ACB633B (two slides
B1 and B2). Specimens forwarded by Dr R. Domrow,
Queensland Institute of Medical Research. Type and
Paratype to be deposited in South Australian Museum
collection. The Paratype has been badly damaged in
mounting, and lacks gnathosoma.
Nomenclature
The species is dedicated to the collector, Edward
Holbrook Derrick, 1898-1976, medical research worker
(see obituary notice in Medical Journal of Australia
6 November 1976).
Remarks on Biology of Chyzeria derricki
Parasitization of an insect host is not unusual for
a trombidioid larval mite. The only other record of
parasitization by a larval Chyzeria upon a host is in
the case of C. onychia (q. v., discussion). The capture
of C. derricki larva upon a tettigoniid host allows
some degree of speculation upon the functional sig-
nificance of the various morphological adaptations
seen in this genus. It is reasonable to suggest, in the
case of mites which live as ectoparasites upon mobile
insects with wide areas of heavy, smooth chitinization
(e.g. Acridoidea and Tettigonioidea), that long legs
and development of suction pads upon the tarsi would
be useful, as would also strong mouthparts to pierce
thickened integuments. On the other hand, it is appar-
ent from a study of at least the erythraeoid mites,
that there may be a considerable degree of host
specificity, e.g. Smaris prominens (Banks) larvae upon
OBSERVATIONS ON CHYZERIA GANESTRINI AND SOME RELATED GENERA
FIG, 14. Chyzeria derricki sp. nov. Holotype larva, A, Gnathosoma
and adjacent part of idiosoma, and trochanters I, dorsal view.
B, Gnathosoma, adjacent idiosoma, with coxae I and part of
trochanters I, ventral view. Both to scale shown. In B, a
pedocoxala is shown further enlarged.
316 REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (14): 285-326
June, 1982
FIG. 15. Chyzeria derricki sp. nov. Holotype larva. Legs I, II and
III, to standard symbols; to scale shown.
small Psocoptera and Erythrites osmondensis (South-
cott) larvae upon Thysanoptera. There may also be
site specificity upon a host, e.g. Callidosoma wom-
ersleyi (Southcott) preferring a site under the wings
of psyllids, as does also the larva of Rainbowia imper-
ator (Hirst, 1928) (Southcott 1961a, p. 477). On the
other hand the larvae of other erythraeid mites, Ery-
thrites reginae (Hirst, 1928) and Erythrites urrbrae
(Womersley, 1934), utilize only the external surfaces
of the thorax and abdomen and not the under-wing
surfaces when parasitizing psyllids and other small
insects.
With regard to those members of the Trombidioidea
whose larvae utilize insect hosts, in general, there are
less systematic data on the range of hosts and the
OBSERVATIONS ON CHYZERIA GANUSTRINI AND SOME RELATED GENERA 417
sites Of parasitic attachment than in the case of the
Erythraeoidea. This means that at present it is not
possible to offer any detailed discussion of the mor-
phological and functional adaptations of these larvae
and their adults. This is particularly so where there
is some unusual structural modification, such as, for
instance, the anterior scutalae of the larva of CAyzeria
Airsti, or the hind tarsi in the larvae of Ettorvelleria
Oudemans, 1911 and Eutrombidium Verdun, 1909,
CHARACTERISTICS OF LARVAL TROMBEL-
LIDAE
Earlier an attempt at a formal definition for larval
Trombellidae was deferred. With the redescription or
description of four species of Chyvzeria in the present
paper plus the rearing of Audyana Womersley 1954,
and with the knowledge that 7rombella Berlese 1887
and Womers/eyia Radford 1946 are synonyms, it is
proposed to examine what characteristics separate
them and the genera Nothotrombicula Dumbleton,
1947 and Ralphaudyna Vercammen-Grandjean et al,,
1974, based on larvac, and also presumed to belong
to the Trombellidae, from other trombidioid (or
related) mites.
This group of larval trombidioid miles has ihe
following characteristics
(1) coxal formula 2, |, |
(2) leg segmental formula;
fa) 7,7, 7 Chyzeria; Nothotronibicula;
Ralphaudyna
(b) 7, 6, 6 Audpana
(c) 6, 6, 6 Trombella
(3) AM scutalae:
(a) absent Chyzeria; Nothotrombicula
(b) present as such Tronibella; Audvana
(c) present as ‘presensillae’* Ra/phaudvna
(4) sternal formula 0, 0, 2
(5) vestigiotibialae |, 0, 0
(6) vestigiogenualae |, 1, 0
(7) solenotibialae:
fa) 0, 0, O Chyzeria; or
(b) 2, 2, 2 Audyana; or
(c) 2,200 Trombella (VieG., 1972)
($) solenogenualac:
(a) 0, O. O Chyzeria: or
(b) 11,1 Trombella, Nothratrambicula; ot
(ce) 2, 1, | Audyana; or
(d) 2, 1, 2 Ralphaudyna
(9) trucheae absent
* Vercammen-Grandjean et al. (1974, p. 246)
(10) pedotarsal claws:
(a) 1,1, 2 Trombella; or
(b) 2, 2, 2 Audyana; or
(ce) 3, 3, 3 Chyzeria; Nothotromhicula;
Ralphaudyna
(11) palpal tibial claw:
(a) trifid Chyzeria,; Nothotrombicula; or
(hb) bifid Ralphaudyna; Trombella; or
(c) quadrifid Audyana
(12) idiosoma seta-bases:
(a) expanded Chyzeria; Ralphaudyna; or
(b) normal Tromhella; Norhotrombiteula:
Audyana
(13) seutum “nasus’;
(a) absent Chyzeria; Audyana; or
(bh) present Trombella; Nothotrombicula;
Ralphaudyna
Taking. these characteristics in order:
(1) This is a characteristic of Leeuwenhoekia,
Odontacarus, and Neotrombidium (Leeuwenhoeki-
idac); it Lhus cannot be taken as a definitive character
of a trombellid larva, but includes also the leeuwen-
hoekiids,
(2) Subcharacter 2 /a) is possessed by many trom-
biculid genera, together with Apolonia, Womersia,
and in fact members of the Erythracoidea and
Hydrachnellae have this characteristic of all femora
divided.
Subcharacter 2 (), of having only the first femur
divided is possessed by other trombiculids, e.g, Wa/-
chia (Walchiinac), also Neotrambidium.
Subcharacter 2 (c), of having all femora undivided.
is possessed by the genera Leeuwenhoekia, Odonta-
carus, Monunguis and various others of the Leeu-
wenhockiidae; also by Lassenia (Johnstonianidae) (see
Table 1).
Clearly this character is of no great value al the
family classification level.
(3) This is another characteristic which may be
present or absent, or present in some degree, and the
sume occurs with other trombidioids (see Table 1).
Similar remarks apply.
(4) This appears to be a constant characteristic. It
is also a characteristic of Leewwenhoekla, Odentu-
earus and Neotrombidium (Lecuwenhoekiidae),
(5) Although this character is present uniformly
among the genera, it also applies widely among
related mites. e.g. Leplotrombidium, Babiangiu
(Trombiculidae), Leeuwenhoekia and Neotrombi-
dium (Leeuwenhoekiidae), Preridopus, etc.
It is thus not of much diagnostic value,
(6) This character is also uniform, but occurs also
318
e.g. in Leeuwenhoekia and Neotrombidium (Leeu-
wenhoekiidae), and also in Pteridopus.
It also is not of much diagnostic value.
(7) Character 7 (a) is shared by Leptotrombidium,
Babiangia, Neotrombidium, for example. Character
7 (c) is shared by Pteridopus, Polydiscia.
It is difficult to see how such a widespread and
variable character can be considered of much diag-
nostic use.
(8) It is clear also that character (8), similarly
widespread and variable, can be considered of little
diagnostic usefulness.
(9) This character is uniform, but also applies to
the majority of the trombidioid mites; see Table 1.
(10) It is clear from inspection that the number of
pedotarsal claws is in no way diagnostic of the trom-
bellids.
It is apparent also that characters (11), (12) and
(13) cannot be used to separate trombellids from
other trombidioids.
In a proposal to separate the Trombellinae from
the Neotrombidiinae Vercammen-Grandjean (1972,
p. 239) proposed the following supposedly differen-
tiating characters for the Trombellinae:
1, a single but trifurcate claw on each anterior and
mid leg, two claws on posterior leg tarsus.
2. no microspurs [=vestigialae here] on anterior
and mid genu.
3. round urstigma between contiguous anterior and
mic [sic, for mid] coxae.
4. uniform porosity on coxae [as against a mosaic
pattern over the lateral part of some of the
coxae]’.
In 1973 (1973b, p. 109) he used the term Trom-
bellidae, ascribed to Feider (1955), although the term
as such appears to have been introduced by Vercam-
men-Grandjean there. As no formal redefinition
appears to have been proposed, it appears reasonable
to accept that the characters listed by Vercammen-
Grandjean (1972, p. 239) remained as his concept of
the differentiating characters of the family Trombel-
lidae, for the larvae. Larval genera accepted by Ver-
cammen-Grandjean (l.c.) as belonging to the Trom-
bellinae were Womersleyia and Audyana.
If we compare the characters listed above with
those discussed in the preceding text of the present
article, we find, with respect to character (1) of
Vercammen-Grandjean, that with the addition of
Chyzeria alone to the list the pedotarsal claw pattern
may be 1, 1, 2 or 2, 2, 2 or 3, 3, 3 (see my character
(10) above).
With respect to Vercammen-Grandjean’s character
REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (14): 285-326
June, 1982
(2), of the possession of a vestigiogenual formula of
0, 0, [0], the formula recorded here is of 1, 1, 0 for
all the genera of the Trombellidae considered here,
which is the same as the formula for the Neotrom-
bidiinae proposed by Vercammen-Grandjean (/.c.),
also for Nothotrombicula.
With respect to character (3) of Vercammen-
Grandjean, above, unless some quantitative measure
of ellipticity is to be applied it is difficult to see how
such a character can be used. The problem here is
not to differentiate the trombellids from the genus
Neotrombidum and its near relations, but to find one
or more criteria which will separate the trombellids
from the other trombidioids, at least in the first
instance.
For character (4), the presence of a mosaic pattern
in the outer parts of coxae I and III in Neotrombidium
and related genera, this appears to be confined to
that group, and is not seen elsewhere among the
Trombidioidea.
It would appear therefore that an examination of
the available data has not yielded criteria which will
allow separation of a larval trombellid with any cer-
tainty, although in some cases, where no rearing cor-
relation has been achieved, e.g. for the genera
Nothotrombicula and Ralphaudyna, the resemblances
to known larval trombellids are so great that they
may be allotted to this family with confidence. At
present therefore it is probably justifiable to retain a
family Trombellidae, but this has to be based on the
adult definition only, and no formal definition of
larval Trombellidae can be proposed with any relia-
bility.
This amounts to confirming the view of Robaux
(1977b) that, in order to work out the phylogenetic
relationships of the Trombidioidea, one cannot rely
solely on one aspect of the morphology of these mites,
such as that of the larvae or of the adults. In fact
Robaux has proposed that biological and ecological
factors must also be considered.
DESCRIPTION OF A PYGMEPHORID MITE PHORETIC
UPON AN ADULT Chyzeria.
We now proceed to a description of a species of
mite, of the family Pygmephoridae, recorded above
as phoretic upon an adult Chyzeria hirsti Wom.
Bakerdania workandae sp. nov.
(Figs. 16, 17, 18)
Description of Non-Gravid Adult Female, Holotype
ACC226, Mounted.
Colour in life light brown. Length of idiosoma
260um; length of gnathosoma from tip of chelicerae
to posterior superior margin of the cheliceral bases
OBSERVATIONS ON CHYZERIA GANESTRINI AND SOME RELATED GENERA ay
FLG. 16. Bakerdania workandae sp. nov. Holotype female, A,
Dorsal view. B, Dorsal view left leg II (setae of tarsus II in-
complete in B, from obscurity of mount), A, B to scale shown.
28um; total length of mite from tip of chelicerae to
posterior pole of idiosoma 288um. Width of idiosoma
at level of legs IIL 170um.
Gnathosoma small, free, subquadrate, 33um wide.
li carries 4 simple spiniform setae dorsally on the
cheliceral bases, lateral 23um long, originate somewhat
posterior to medial, which are 20um long. Ventrally
the gnathosoma carries a short spiniform seta (palpal
coxala) 144m long, originating immediately behind
the proximal free palpal segment. Both dorsally and
ventrally a midline chitinous raphe separates the twa
gnathobases, Chelicerae small, the stylets not
extruded, but confined in the specimen in a small
conical cap.
320
Palpi of two mobile segments. Proximal segment
(femur-genu) with a dorsolateral spiniform seta, 11m
long, and distal segment (tibiotarsus) with a similar
dorsolateral spiniform seta, 15um long. Palpal tibi-
otarsus bears distally a strong broad-tipped tooth,
with three or four weakly defined cusps, the lateral-
most projecting farthest. Distal segment bears ven-
trally two solenoidalae, expanded, projecting somewhat
anterolaterally. The more posterolateral (solenoidala
“1"), about 4 um long by lum wide, is thinner,
somewhat clavate; the more medial (solenoidala ‘*2’’)
is larger, 8um long by 3um wide, approximately
thumb-shaped with an excavated base.
Propodosoma dorsally trapezoidal, widest poste-
riorly, and with the anterolateral angles rounded;
about half as long as wide. Laterally, at about the
middle level on each side, is a large circular peritremal
opening, 9um wide, with the centres 37um apart.
Behind and lateral to each peritremal opening is the
short anterolateral propodosomal setae, spiniform, 7um
long. Behind and slightly lateral to this seta is the
larger posterior propodosomal seta, tapering, pointed,
lightly barbed, 29um long. Behind this, on each side,
is a clavate sensillum, 25um long, by 7um wide at its
thickest part.
Ventral propodosomal setae consist of two more or
less transverse rows of 4 setae, total 8; these are
tapering, pointed and barbed. The anterior of these
arise from the coxal plates (‘‘ventrites”) of the first
pair of legs. The medial pair of these setae strong,
4ium long, arising at about the middle of the coxal
segment; the lateral pair 30um long, and arise from
the cusp between the two leg trochanters (“coxae”
of some authors), almost directly below the alveoli of
the posterolateral dorsal propodosomal setae. These
setae appear as normal type setae, i.e. scobalae, and
they are not split or modified in any unusual way.
The second row of propodosomal ventralae are similar
to the first row; they originate laterally upon a small
triangular section of the second coxal plate, at its
anterolateral angle, and juxtaposed to the acetabular
socket of leg II; medial setae 50um long, lateral
(which is slightly posterior) 52um long (these two
setae are the internal and external ventral setae II of
authors). The margins of the circum-gnathosomal for-
amen are only moderately thickened. Apodemes II
transverse. The posterior marginal apodeme of the
propodosoma somewhat thickened, more or less linear,
running anterolaterally, the two lateral members
meeting in a blunted obtuse angle.
Hysterosoma, dorsum: setae long, strong, tapering,
pointed, with barbed ciliations. First dorsal pair of
setae level with first lateral pair of hysterosomal
setae, dorsals 53um long, laterals 78um long; dorsals
I are 91um apart. Hind margin of anteromost dorsal
plate weakly emarginate. Dorsals II 734m long, 72um
apart. Dorsals II] 91um long, 59um apart: laterals
REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (14): 285-326
June, 1982
II] somewhat anterolateral to the dorsals, and 43 um
long. Posterior margin of segment III with distinct
smooth median excavation. Dorsals TV ca 90um long
(broken at tip), and centres 28um apart; laterals 1V
63um long with centres 80um apart, and a little
anterior to dorsals IV.
Hysterosoma, venter: all setae of posterior ventral
plate tapering, pointed, with weak barbed ciliations.
Medial presternal setae 414m long with centres 30um
apart, somewhat anterior to lateral presternals which
are 53um long with bases 714m apart. The latter are
a little anterior to the axillary I setae, which are 35um
long with bases 102m apart. Lateral presternals arise
well anterior to apodemes IV, and well lateral to
medial presternals. Axillary setae II (arising between
the origins of legs HI and IV) 53um long by 98um
apart. Medial poststernal setae are 44um long by
22um apart; lateral poststernal setae are 73um long
by 50um apart. Thus the lateral poststernals are the
longest of these setae; and the axillary I setae are the
shortest. Apodemes III not clearly defined in the
specimen. Apodemes IV are only slightly flexed pos-
teriorly to meet edges of acetabular sockets of legs
II]. Apodemes V not clearly defined. The posterior
margin of the posterior ventral plate is more or less
transverse, only a little sinuous. Opisthosoma ventrally
entire, with only a minute clefi indicated at posterior
pole. The most posterior opisthosomal setae (“‘cau-
dals’’) consist of a transverse row of 6 pointed, ciliated
setae: lateral pair 19um long, bases 37um apart
between centres, as usual; the other 4 setae in 2 groups
of 2, each lateral group adjoined, the lateral of these
26um long, medials 324m long, centres of bases of
each pair 3um apart, the medial of these setae with
bases 164m apart. From the posterior opisthosomal
cleft two small ‘“‘apodemes” diverge in a wishbone-
like manner, 17m long.
Legs as figured. The lengths of the non-fixed part
of the legs, to the tip of the tarsal claws, as follows:
I 106um, I] 133um, HT 152um, TV 226um.
The lengths of the mobile leg segments are as
follows (um) (excluding pedicle and claws in tarsus):
Leg ] II Il IV
trochanter* 19 25 33 59
femur 28 34 44 52
genu 18 15 15 14
tibia 56 18 21 27
tarsus —_** 41 37 73
* Cross (1964, 1965) calls this the coxa, and labels subsequent
segments accordingly. ;
**In leg I tibia and tarsus are fused to a single segment.
OBSERVATIONS ON CHYZERIA GANESTRINI AND SOME RELATED GENERA 321
¢ ‘
i N =o
~ ‘p if .
piv \
ey bo JX ee
es eee —*:
f)
iV
Zea ee
\, = Hy
/)
@
~
Tm,
y i, ~
\
ras
,
FIG, 17. Bakerdania workandue sp. noy. Holotype female. A,
Ventral view. B, Ventral view of left leg II (setae of tarsus II
incomplete in B, from obscurity of mount). (A, B to scale
shown.) C Distal segment of left palp, further enlarged.
322
The setation formula of the legs is (see Figs. 16,
17):
Leg I I Ill IV
trochanter ld 0 lv lv
femur ld, lv, 3d, Id, lv Id, lv
ll (‘c’?) 0-lv
genu 2d, 2v 2d, lv 2v Ip
tibia 8d, 7v 1d, 11, 2d, 2v, 2d, 2v
+3So0 2v+So +So
tarsus — 4d, 4v 4-5d, 2v 4d, 2v
+So
Details of leg specialized setae are as follows:
Leg I. The tip of ‘seta c’ of femur I (a modified
scobala) somewhat falciform and sharply proflexed.
On dorsum of tibiotarsus I are two expanded sole-
noidalae, and more distally one attenuated solenoi-
dala, and more distally again a retroflexed sensory
seta; at the “proral situation” a further seta, probably
a solenoidala.
Leg II. On tibia II the proximal end is overlain
dorsally by a stout clavate solenoidala. On tarsus II
a similar clavate solenoidala lies dorsally and proxi-
mally.
Leg III. On tibia HII a clavate solenoidala arises
proximally and dorsally.
Tarsal claws: On leg I single, on a short pedicle,
and the tibiotarsus I distally and ventrally carries a
short “‘thumb-process”. On tarsi II-IV the claws are
double, each claw strong, falciform, and with a basal
tuberosity or “cushion”; the middle (neomedian) claw
has a chitinized wishbone-like basal piece, from which
an adhesive membrane spreads out fanwise, lobate.
Material Examined
Holotype specimen, ACC226, to be deposited in
South Australian Museum collection. Taken attached
to central dorsal area of adult Chyzeria hirsti Wom.,
specimen ACB320, from under stone, Workanda
Creek, National Park, Belair, South Australia,
1 August 1948, R. V. Southcott.
Notes on Behaviour
On capture the adult Chyzeria hirsti was examined
under a binocular microscope to see if it carried any
larval Chyzeria. None was observed. I recorded “To
my surprise I found a small brown mite in the cavity
of its back as shown [see Fig. 18]... It was cleaning
the back part of the abdomen by hooking its last pair
of legs over, in the same way as a fly does”.
The relationship between the adult female pygme-
phorid mite and the adult Chyzeria hirsti is presum-
ably best described as a phoretic one. The relationship
is unlikely to be a parasitic one in view of the small
REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (14): 285-326
June, 1982
size of the cheliceral stylets of pygmephorids, and the
fact that the pygmephorids, in a restricted sense, are
not known to be parasitic; a number of species are
now known to be fungus-feeders (see e.g. Wicht (1970),
Kosir (1975) and the further references they quote).
t
a
B'S
a
Urns
FIG. 18. Adult male Chyzeria hirsti Womersley carrying an adult
female pygmephorid mite, the holotype of Bakerdania wor-
kandae sp. nov., in the space on the dorsum between the
dorsal idiosomal processes. From life, redrawn from a sketch
made at the time.
As a phoretic host, it would appear that the adult
Chyzeria hirsti is not likely to be efficient. Although
Chyzeria hirsti adults are, among similar-sized soil-
inhabiting Australian adult trombidoid mites, rela-
tively fast-moving, it would seem unlikely that they
would disperse over other than small distances.
Remarks on Classification
In the systematic placing of Bakerdania workandae
I have been initially guided by the works of Krezal
(1959) and Cross (1964, 1965). Cross produced a
monographic revision of the genera of the Pyemotidae
(sensu lato), and this was to have been followed by
a first application of the revision to localized faunas.
The large monographic revision was published as
Cross (1965) and contained a division of the old genus
Pygmephorus Kramer, 1877 into the new genera
Acinogaster Cross 1965, Parapygmephorus Cross
1965, Pseudopygmephorus Cross 1965, and Neopyg-
mephorus Cross 1965, as well as a number of subge-
nera. Cross applied these names in his paper studying
OBSERVATIONS ON CHYZERIA GANESTRINI AND SOME RELATED GENERA
the relevant mite fauna of Macquarie Island, which
appeared earlier as Cross (1964), By then he had
reached the conclusion that the separation of the
genera named might not be entirely valid, as the
Macquarie Island survey immediately revealed species
with characters belonging ta one or more of the
genera proposed. In response to this he placed the
five Macquarie Island species in Neopyymephorus,
with the comment that “In the above paper [Cross,
1965], | divided the tribe Neopygmephorini into four
new genera .-.. Acquisition of new material since
then indicates. that this grouping is probably unjus-
tified, ard that it is more realistic to join at least
Pseudopygmepharus and Neopygmephorus ... 2. OF
the two last-named generic names, Pseudopyemepho-
rus has. page priority, but Cross (1964) presumably
chose to use the name Neopygmephorus on the ground
that a tribal name was based upon it, although this
is not stated.
Subsequently Cross (1970) has shown ihat /Veo-
pvegmephorus is a junior synonym of Bakerdania Sasa
1961, and this has been accepted by other workers
on the Pygmephoridae and Pyemotidae, e.g, Mahunka
(1973a, b), Rack (1974).
A further complication has since been discovered
which may have an important bearing on the generic
placing of “pyemotid’’ mites. This is ihe observation
that in certain of the pygmephorid and pyemotid
mites the adult females may appear in two forms,
the phoretomorph and the non-phoretomorphic lorms,
which have different generic placernents in existing
classifications, e.g. Siteroptes and Pediculaster. or
Siteroptes und Pygmephorellus (Rack 1974, Cross
and Moser 1965; Moser and Cross 1975), So far this
phenonienon does not appear to have been recorded
with those pygmephorid mites allotted Lo the generic
forms proposed by Cross in 1965, but clearly this
possibility cannot be excluded.
In recent years no full revision of the Pygmephor-
idae and Pyemotidae has been published*, and at
present the only general work on the pygmephorids
and pyemotids of the world is by Krezal (1959). In
this latter the old genus Pygmephorus Kramer 1877
was not divided into subgenera. By Krezal’s key the
species described above comes to the caption of Pyg-
mephorus kachi Krezal 1959, from which there are
a number of morphological differences. Among these
are the more. spindle-shaped tibiotarsi I, the presence
of a strong opposition-piece (anvil, or incws) ta the
claw of tibiotarsus 1, the far more elongate tarsus FY
“In recent years further taxonumie changes at the family and
suprafainifial levels have been introduced for these mites. Thus tho
superfamily names Pyemotoidea and Pygmephoroidea have been
tised by some authors (see further in Krantz, 1978). These taxonomic
changes are, however, outside the soupe of the present work,
323
(three times the length of tibia IV, as against twice
in the case of P. Kochi) and a number of other factors.
P. kochi was one of the 16 species. or subspecies
placed by Cross (1965, p. 224) tentatively in his genus
Pseudopyamephorus
By the generic table of Cross (1965) the species
described aboye comes within Neupygmephoris Cross
1965, subg, Neopyemephorus, Cross (1965, p. 230)
gave a list of the already described “pyemotids”
which he believed should be placed in this subgenus,
amounting to 17 species and one subspecies, but did
nol submit a diagnostic key to separate them, The
only recent key to a group of related pyemotid mites
from the Australian region known to the present
author is Cross’s (1964) study of the fauna fram
Macquarie Island, allotted to Neapygmephorus. These
indicate the wide-spread distribution of these mites,
as species known hitherto from Europe, Japan and
North America were represented,
Accepting that the species described above belongs
to Neopygmephorus as used by Cross in his 1964
paper, Le. to Bakerdania Sasa 1961, and using that
key, one finds that B. workandae cames closest to B
arvorunt (Jacot 1936), originally described from North
America by Jacot (/. c.) but how known to occur alsu
in Macquarie Island (Cross 1964), Germany (Rack
1967), Jugoslavia (Mahunka L975b) and Tunisia
(Mahunka 1978) and to & fogata (Willmann 1942),
originally described frorn Germany, but now also
recorded from Macquarie Island (Cross 1964). Hong
Kong (Mahunka 1975a) and Africa (Mahunka 1976).
Rack (1967 p.10) places P. arvorum Jacot, 1936 in
Pseudopygmephorus Cross, as did alsa Cross (1965,
p. 224).
From these two species 8. workandae may be sep-
arated as follows:
B. workandae has 6 caudal setac instead of the 4
which oceur in 8. arverum.
B. workandae has the lateral presternal setae well
lateral to the medial presternals, while in B. logaia
the lateral presternal setae are only slightly lateral 10
the medial presternals. In B. workandae the lateral
poststernal setae are significantly longer than trochan-
ter IV, while in B. rogata the lateral poststernals are
significantly shorter than trochanter IV (see further
in Cross 1964; Willmann 1942),
A number al papers have been written on the
pyematid fauna af the world since the acceptance of
the status of Bakerdania as a senior synonym of
Neopyemephorus; some of these describe new species
uf Bakerdania. Of the new species described, jn the
literature available to me from the extensive reprint
library of the South Australian Museum, and in my
own and other libraries, there is only one which
appears to have a significant resemblance to B. wer-
314
kandae sp, nov, This 1s B, diserepata Mahunka, 1973,
from Ghana (1973b, p, 318). Both of these species
are known from only a solilary female; males are
linknown for them. These two females may be sepa-
rated as follaws:
Tarsus IV (excluding claws and pedicle) less
than twice as long as tibia LV. Tibiotarsus I short,
ellipsoidal, Distal solenoidala on tibiotarsus I
short, about half as long as the immediately
proximal thick solenvidala, ,.B, discrepata
Mahunka 1973
Tarsus TV (excluding claws and pedicle) more
than twice as long as tibia IV. Tibiotarsus [
spindle-shaped, Distal solenoidala of tibiotarsus
I long and attenuated, longer than the proximal
thick solenoidala... 8. workandae sp, nov.
Acknowledgement
Tam indebted to Evert E, Lindquist, Senior Acar-
ologist, Biasystematics Research Institute, Ottawa,
Canada, for helpful criticism of this paper.
References
ANDRE, M. 1962. Acarina: Thrombidiformes—Etudes de la faune
du sol. Biol, dmeér, Austr, Party bt 111-29. Cited by Zoological
Record for 1962,
ANDRE, M, 1963. Observations complémentaires sur Vadulte et
description de ka forme nymphale de Chyzeria africana Law-
aad 1944 (Thrombidions; Chyzerini). 4earolagia 5 (4): 561-
ANDRE, M., and Leliévre-Farjon. J. 1960. Nouveau Chyzeria
originaire d’Aménique du Sud, dcarelugia 2. (4): 461-5.
AUDY, J.B, 1954. Malaysian parasites IX, Notes on (he taxonomy
of trombicubd miles wilh description of a new subgenus. Sid.
Inst, Med. Res. Malaya No, 26; 123-70,
AUDY, J, R. 1957. Malaysian Parasites—XXXIV_ A review of
the literature. Stud. Inst. Med. Res. Malaya No. 28: 427-47,
BAKER, E. W., and WHARTON, G. W, 1952. "An introduction
to acarology” (The Macmillan Company: New York),
BANKS, N, 1894. Some new American Acarina. rans. Amer.
Ent. Sac, 24; 209-22,
BERLESE, A. 1887. Trombella glandulosa Berl. 4. sp, let gen.),
(with plate). Acari, Myriapoda et Pseadoscorpiones hucusque
rR ftalia reperta, Number 40, Pi, 2, (Vol. TV), A. Berlese.
alavii,
BRENNAN. J. M 1946. A new genus und species of chigger,
Chatia setosa (Trambiculidae, Acarina) from northwestern
United States. J. Parasrtal. 32 (2): (42-5.
CANESTRINI, G_ 1897. Nuovi acaroidei della N. Giijnes, Tver
mészerr, Piiz We 461-74.
CROSS, E. A, 1964, Pyemolidae (Acarina; Tarsonemoides) from
peraedtie Island. Pacific Insects Monograph 7 (Supplement):
642-6,
CROSS; E. A, 1965, The generic relationships af the family
Pyemotidae (Acarina: Tromibidiformes). Univ. Kansas Science
Bull, 45 (2): 29-275
CROSS, E. A. 1970. Prostigmata; Tarsonemoidea: Pyemotidac of
South Georgia; pp. 175-120 in Gressitt, J. 1, (Ed.), Subantaretic
entomology, particularly of South Georgia and Heard sland,
Pacific Inseets, Monog, 23
CROSS, Ff. Aj and MOSER, J.C. 1975. A new, dimonphic species
of Pyemotes and a key ta the previously-deseribed forme
Ee Tarsonemoidea), 4aa, Enr. Suc) America 68 (Al:
723-32,
REC. S, AUST. MUS., [8 (14): 285-324
June, [982
DUMBLETON, L. J. 1947. Trombidiidae (Acarina) from the
Solomon Islands and New Zealand. Trans, Rey, Sac. New
Zealand 76 (4): 409-13.
EWING. H. E. 1929. “A manual of external parasites," (Charles
C. Thomas: Springfield, Ulinois and Baltimore, Maryland),
EWING, H, EB. 1944. Notes an the taxonomy of the trambiculid
mites, Proc, Biol, See. Wash. 57: 101-4,
EWING, H. E. 1946. Notes on trombiculid mites with descriptions
of Walchiinae n. subf., Speotrombicula n. gen., and Eutram-
hicula defecta n. sp. J. Parasitol. 32 (5): 435A0.
Fe Tite Acarina Trombidoidea. Fauna R. P. Ran. 5
(1): 1-186.
FEIDER, 2 1959. New proposals on the classification of mites
from the group Trambidia (in Russian, with English summary)
Zoaolog. Zhurn, 38 (4): 537-49,
HIRST, S. 1924. On three new Acari belonging. to the superfamily
Trombidioidea Proce. Zovl, Soc, London 1924, (4): 1075-80,
HIRST, S, 1926. Descriptions of new mites, including four new
oe ol “red spider”. Proc. Zool, Soc, London 1926, (3):
825-41
HIRST, S. 19284. On some new Australlan mites of the families
Trombidiidae and Erythracidae. Ann. Mog. nal, Hist. (10) 1
(4): 563-71
HIRST, 5, 1928b, On some Australian species of ‘Tramibidiidae,
Proc. Zool Noe. London, 1928, No. 67: 1021-34.
HIRST, S. 1929. Additional notes on Australian mites of the family
Trombidiidac, with descriptions of pew forms, Pree, Zool.
Sac London, ¥929 (2): 165-76.
HIRST, A. S. 1991, On some new Australian Acari (Trombidiidae,
ew and Gamasidae), Proe. Zoel. Soe. London, 1941
(2): 361-4,
THE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON ZOOLOGICAL
NOMENCLATURE, 196]. International Code of Zoological
Nomenclature adopted by the XV International Congress of
etiog International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature:
ondon,
JACOT, A. P. 1936, An undescribed pediculoidid mite from the
southern Appalachians. Canadian Ent. 68: 82-5. Cited by
Cross 1964, 1965.
KOSIR, M, 1975, Ernahrung und Entwicklung von Pyemephorus
mesembrinae und P, yuadratus (Pyginephoridae, Tarsonemini,
Beata Bemerkungen iiber drei weitere Arten. Pedobialogia
1S. 313-29.
KRAMER, P, 1877 Awei parssitische Milben des Maulwurfs,
arch, [. Naturges. 43 (|); 248-295. Cited by Cross, 1965, and
others.
KRANYTZ, G W_ 1978. "A manual of acaralogy”, 2nd ed. Oregon
State University Bookstores, Lnc.: Corvallis, Oregon,
KRCZAL, H. 1959. Systematik und Okologie der Pyemotiden,
Beitrage zur Systematik und Okologie mitteleuropdiseher Acar
ina. Band |> Tyroglyphidae und Tarsonemini, Teil 2. pp. 385-
625, Akademische Verlapsgesellschalt, Leipzig.
LAWRENCE, R. F. 1944. Some new trombidiform mites [rom
South Africa, Ann. Naral Museunt 10 (3), 437-58,
LAWRENCE, R. F, 1949, The farval trombiculid mites of South
African vertebrates. Ana. Natal Mus. 11 (3); 405-86.
LEACH, W. BK. 1815. A tabular view of (he external characters
of 4 classes of animals, etc, Trans, Linn, Soc. Lond, WW (2).
306-400; cited by Qudemans (1937), Thor and Willmann (1947).
LINDQUIST, F. BE. and VERCAMMEN-GRANDJEAN, P. H,
1971 Revision of the chigger-like larvae of the genera /Veo-
frumbidium Leonardi and Monunguis Wharton, with a re-
definition of the subfamily Neotrombidiinac Feider in (he
Trombidiidae (Acarina: Prostigmata). Canad. Ent, 103: 1557)
90.
MAHUMNKA, S. (19734), Auf Insekten lebende Milben (Acari:
Acarida, Tarsonemida) aus Afriku. 1, Acta zeol. Acad, Sei.
Hung. U9 (|-2): 75-123,
MAHUNKA, 3S. (1974b). Aut Insekte lebende Milben (Acari!
Acarida, Tarsonemida) aus Afrika. Ul. ter coal Acad. Set
flung. 19 (4-4): 289-347,
OBSERVATIONS ON CHYZERIA GANESTRINI AND SOME RELATED GENERA
MAHUNKA, S. 1975a. Neue und interessante Milben aus dem
Genfer Museum. XIV. Tarsonemida aus Hong-Kong (Acari).
Arch. Sci. nat. phys. Hist. nat. Geneve 28 (2): 183-8.
MAHUNKA, 8. 1975b. Beitrige zur Kenntnis der Tarsonemiden
(Acari) von Kleinsatigernestern aus der Umgebung von Ljubljana
(Jugoslavien). Parasit. hung. 8: 75-83.
MAHUNKA, S. 197Sc. Further data to the knowledge of Tarso-
nemida (Acari) living on small mammals in North America.
Parasit, hung. 8: 85-94,
MAHUNKA, S. 1976 Athiopische Tarsonemiden (Acari: Tarsonem-
ida). II. Act, zool Acad. Sci. Hung. 22 (1-2): 69-96.
MAHUNKA, S. 1978. Beitrige zur Kenntnis der Tarsonemiden-
Fauna (Acari: Tarsonemida) Tunisiens. Parasit. hung. 11
113-25.
METHLAGL, A. 1928. Uber die Trombidiose in der dsterreichischen
Alpenlandern. Akad. der Wiss. Wien, Math-Nat. Kl., Denkschr.
101(8): 213-50.
MOSER, J. C., and CROSS, E. A. 1975. Phoretomorph: a new
phoretic phase unique to the Pyemotidae (Acarina: Tarsone-
moidea). Ann. Ent. Soc. America 68 (5): 820-2.
NADCHATRAM, M. 1963. The larva and nymph of Odontacarus
audyi (Radford) (Acarina: Trombiculidae), Pacific Insects 5
(3): 535-40,
NEWELL, I. M. 1957. Studies on the Johnstonianidae (Acari,
Parasitengona). Pacific Sci. 11 (4): 396-466.
OUDEMANS, A. C. 1911. Acarologische aanteekeningen XXXV.
Ent. Ber., Amst. 3 (57): 118-26.
OUDEMANS, A. C. 1912. Die bis jetzt bekannten Larven von
Thrombidiidae und Erythraeidae mit besonderer Beriicksichti-
gung der fiir den Menschen schadlichen Arten. Zool. Jb. Abt.
1 Suppl. XIV, No. 1, pp. 1-230.
OUDEMANS, A. C. 1937. Kritisch Historisch Overzicht der Acar-
ologie, Vol. II], Band D, G, (E. J. Brill; Leiden).
RACK, GISELA 1967, Neue Pyemotenfunde in Hamburg (Acarina,
Pyemotidae). Ent. Mitt. Zool. Staatsinst. Zoolog. Mus. Ham-
burg 3 (58): 1-17.
RACK, GISELA 1974. Neue and bekannte Milbenarten der Uber-
familie Pygmephoroidea aus dem Saalkreis bei Halle (Acarina,
Tarsonemida). Entomol. Mitt. Zool. Mus. Hamburg 4 (87):
499-521.
RADFORD, C. D. 1946. Larval and nymphal mites (Acarina;
Trombiculidae) from Ceylon and the Maldive Islands. Para-
sitology 37 (1, 2): 46-54.
ROBAUX, P. 1969. Thrombidiidae d’Amérique du Sud. II.-Chy-
zerini, Thrombidiinae; solenidiotaxie du palpe chez quelques
Thrombidiidae; relations entre les Podothrombium Berlese
1910, Variathrombium n. g. et les Thrombidiinae s. /. Acar-
ologia 11 (1): 69-93.
ROBAUX, P. 1977a. Observations sur quelques Actinedida
(= Prostigmates) du sol d’Amérique du Nord. VI1[—Sur deux
formes larvaires nouvelles de Trombidioidea (Acari). Acarologia
18 (4): 651-67.
ROBAUX, P. 1977b. Observations sur quelques Actinedida
(= Prostigmates) du sol d’Amérique du Nord. LX. Nouvelles
formes larvaires de trombidions (Acari). Acarologia 19 (2):
258-71.
ROVNER, J. S., Higashi, G. A., and Foelix, R. F. 1973. Maternal
behavior in wolf spiders: the role of abdominal hairs. Science
182 (4117): 1153-5.
SASA, M. 1961. New mites of the Genus Pygmephorus from
small mammals in Japan (Acarina, Pyemotidae). Jap. J. exp.
Med. 31 (3): 191-208.
SOUTHCOTT, R. V. 1946. Studies on Trombidiidae (Acarina).
Some observations on the biology of the Microtrombidiinae.
Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 70 (5-6): 312-6.
SOUTHCOTT, R. V. 1954a. The genus Neotrombidium (Acarina:
Lecuwenhoekiidae). I. Description of the ovum and larva of
Neotrombidium barringunense Hirst 1928, with an account
ares biology of the genus. Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Aust, 77: 89-
325
SOUTHCOTT, R. V. 1954b. Description of a new genus and
species of larval trombiculid mite from New Guinea. Trans.
Roy, Soc. S, Aust. 77: 98-102.
SOUTHCOTT, R. V. 1957a. Rediscovery of Ctenerythraeus Berlese
1918 (Acarina, Trombidiidae), with redescription, and its syn-
onymy with Spathulathrombium Womersley 1945, Trans. Roy.
Soc, S, Aust. 80: 135-43.
SOUTHCOTT, R. V. 1957b. The genus Acomatacarus (Acarina:
Trombiculidae). I. Description of three new species from Trinity
Bay, north Queensland. Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Aust. 80: 146-55
SOUTHCOTT, R. V. 1957c. The genus Neotrombidium (Acarina:
Leeuwenhoekiidae). II. Further notes on systematics, with a
description of a further species from north Queensland. Trans.
Roy. Soc. S. Aust. 80: 156-64.
SOUTHCOTT, R. V. 1957d. On Vatacarus ipoides n. gen., n. sp.
(Acarina: Trombidioidea) a new respiratory endoparasite from
a Pacific sea-snake. Trans. Roy. Soc, S. Aust. 80: 165-76.
SOUTHCOTT, R. V. 1961a. Studies on the systematics and
biology of the Erythraeoidea (Acarina), with a critical revision
of the genera and subfamilies. Aust. J. Zool. 9 (3): 367-610.
SOUTHCOTT, R. V. 1961b. Description of two new Australian
Smarididae (Acarina), with remarks on chaetotaxy and geo-
graphical distribution. Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Aust. 85: 133-53
SOUTHCOTT, R. V. 1963a. The Smarididae (Acarina) of north
and central America and some other countries. Trans, Roy.
Soc. S. Aust. 86: 159-245.
SOUTHCOTT, R. ¥. 1963b, Herbert Womersley (1889-1962)
[Obituary notice of]. Acarologia 5 (3); 323-34.
SOUTHCOTT, R. V. 1966. Revision of the genus Charletonia
Oudemans (Acarina: Erythraeidae). Aust. J. Zool, 14 (4):
687-819,
THOR, S. 1935. Ubersicht und Einteilung der Familie Trombidiidae
ay a Leach, 1814 in unter-Familien. Zool. Anz. 109 (5-6):
-12.
THOR, S., and WILLMANN, C. 1947. Trombidiidae. Tierreich
Tb: 187-541, xxix-xxxvi.
TORRES, S., and BRAGA, J. W. 1938. Nova parasitose em
pintos. Trombiculinose nodular causada por Apollonia (sic)
(n.g.) tigipionsis (sic) (n. spc.). (Nota prévia). Trabalho da
Secdo de Veterinaria do Inst. Pesq. Agronomicas Pernambuco,
Brasil, pp. 171-2, plus two plates. (See also next entry.)
TORRES, S., and BRAGA,[J.] W. 1939. Apolonia tigipidensis, g.
et sp. n. (Trombiculinae) parasito de Gallus gallus dom. Nova
chave para determinacdo de generos. Bol. Soc. Bras. Med.
Ver. 9 (1): 1-7 (and 5 plates).
UNITED STATES BOARD ON GEOGRAPHIC NAMES. 1957,
Gazeteer No. 40. Australia. Official Standard Names approved
by the United States Board on Geographic Names. (U.S. Govt.
Printing Office, Washington).
VERCAMMEN-GRANDIJEAN, P. H. 1955. Un genre nouveau:
Durenia, dans la sous-famille des Trombellinae (Trombidiidae—
Acarina). Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr. 52 (3-4): 252-60.
VERCAMMEN-GRANDSJEAN, P.H. 1967. Revision of Hoploth-
rombium quinquescutatum Ewing, 1925 (Trombidiidae: Acar-
ina), Opuscula Zoologica, No. 96: 1-7.
VERCAMMEN-GRANDIJEAN, P. H. 1968. The chigger mites
of the Far East. Special Study. (U.S. Army Medical Research
and Development Command: Washington, D. C. 20315).
VERCAMMEN-GRANDJEAN, P. H. 197la. Revision of the
species Walchia disparunguis (Oudemans, 1929) and its group
(Acarina, Trombiculidae). Opuscula Zoologica, No. 115: |-
12,
VERCAMMEN-GRANDJEAN, P. H. 1971b. Preliminary note to
a tentative neophylogeny of trombiculids. Proc. 3rd Internat.
Congr. Acarology, Prague, pp. 311-9.
VERCAMMEN-GRANDJEAN, P. H. 1972. Revision of Wom-
ersley’s Apoloniinae (Acarina, Leeuwenhoekidae (sic)), for the
Asiatic-Pacific region. Folia parasitologica (Praha) 19; 227-
52.
VERCAMMEN-GRANDSJEAN, P. H. 1973a. Tentative neophy-
logeny of trombiculids. Folia parasitologica (Praha) 20: 49-
66.
326
VERCAMMEN-GRANDJEAN, P. H, 1973b. Sur les statuts de
la famille des Trombidiidae Leach, 1815 (Acarina: Prostig-
mata). Acarologia 15 (1): 102-14.
VERCAMMEN-GRANDJEAN, P. H. 1974. Revision de Leeu-
wenhoekia verduni (Qudemans, 1910), l'espéce type de la
famille des Leeuwenhoekiidac Womersley. 1945 (Acarina:
Prostigmata). Acarologia 16 (2): 311-8.
VERCAMMEN-GRANDIJEAN, P. H., and AUDY, J. R. 1965.
Revision of the genus Eutrombicula Ewing 1938. Acarologia
7, fasc. suppl. 280-94.
VERCAMMEN-GRANDJEAN, P. H. and KOLEBINOVA, M.
1968. Revision of the subfamily Apoloniinae Wharton, 1947
(Lecuwenhoekiidae: Acarina), Acarologia 10 (2): 250-68.
VERCAMMEN-GRANDJEAN, P. H., KUMADA, N., NEWELL,
I. M., ROBAUX, P., and SUZUKI, H. 1974, Ralphaudyna
amamiensis, an ultimate homage to the memory of Dr. J.
Ralph Audy (Acarina: Parasitengona). Jap. J. sanit, Zool. 25
(3): 245-9.
VERDUN, P. 1909. Sur Popportunité de la division du genre
Trombidium proposée par Oudemans. C. R. Sac. Biol., Paris
67; 244-6. (Cited by Oudemans, 1912, and others.)
VITZTHUM, H. G. 1931. Acari. In ‘Handbuch der Zoologie. Ein
Naturgeschichte der Stiimme des Tierreiches’. (Eds. W. Kiiken-
thal and T. Krumbach,) Band 3, Halfte 2, Lieferung 1, pp. 1-
160.
VITZTHUM, H. G. 1940-1943. Acarina. In ‘Klassen und Ord-
nungen des Tierreichs’. (Ed. H. G. Bronn.) Band 5, Abteilung
4, Buch 5. (Lieferung 1-3, pp. 1-480, 1940; 4, pp. 481-640,
1941; 5-6, pp. 641-912, 1942; 7, pp. 913-1 011, 1943.)
WHARTON, G. W. 1938. Acarina of Yucatan Caves. Article X
in ‘Fauna of the Caves of Yucatan’. (Ed. A. S. Pearse.)
Carnegie Instn. of Washington, Publ. No. 491, pp. 137-152.
WHARTON, G. W. 1947. Studies on North American chiggers.
2. The subfamilies and Womersia strandimani n. g., n. sp. J.
Parasitol. 33 (4): 380-4.
WHARTON, G. W,, and FULLER, H. S. 1952, A manual of the
chiggers. The biology, classification, distribution, and impor-
REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (14): 285-326
June, 1982
tance to man of the larvae of the family Trombiculidae (Acar-
ina). Mem. Ent. Soc. Washington 4: 1-185.
WICHT, M. C., Jr. 1970, Three new species of pyemotid mites
associated with commercial mushrooms. Acarologia 12. (2):
262-8.
WILLMANN, C. 1942. Acari aus nordwestdeutschen Mooren,
Abh. Nat. Ver. Bremen 32 (1): 163-83.
WOMERSLEY, H. 1934. A revision of the trombid and erythracid
mites of Australia with descriptions of new genera and species.
Ree, S. Aust, Mus. § (2): 179-254.
WOMERSLEY, H. 1937. A revision of the Australian Trombidiidae
(Acarina). Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 6 (1): 75-100.
WOMERSLEY, H. 1939. Further notes on the Australian Trom-
bidiidae with description of new species. Trans, Roy. Soc. 8.
Aust. 63 (2): 149-66.
WOMERSLEY, H, 1942, Additions to the Acarina of Australia
(Trombidiidae and Calyptostomidae). Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 7
(2): 169-81.
WOMERSLEY, H. 1944. Notes on and additions to the Trombi-
culinae and Leeuwenhoekiinae (Acarina) of Australia and
New Guinea, Trans. Roy. Soc, S. Aust. 68 (1): 82-112.
WOMERSLEY, H. 1945. Acarina of Australia and New Guinea.
The family Leeuwenhoekiidae. Trans, Roy. Soc. S. Aust. 69
(1): 96-113.
WOMERSLEY, H. 1954a. New genera and species, apparently of
Apoloniinae (Acarina, Leeuwenhoekiidae), from the Asiatic-
Pacific region, Malaysian Parasites VII. Stud. Inst. Med. Res.,
Malaya, No. 26: 108-19.
WOMERSLEY, H. 1954b. On the subfamily Trombellinae Sig
Thor 1935 (Acarina, Trombidiidae) with a diagnosis of the
nymph of Audyana thompsoni Womersley, 1954. Rec, S.
Aust. Mus. 11 (2): 121-8.
WOMERSLEY, H. 1963. ‘Monunguis’ Wharton 1938, a valid
genus. (Acarina, Trombidioidea), Rec. S. Aust, Mus. 14 (3):
477-85.
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SOILS
3. ARTHRONOTINA (CRYPTOSTIGMATA)
BY DAVID C. LEE
Summary
A study of sarcoptiform mites from surface soil (usually greatest depth = 4cm) at 9 florally diverse
sites in South Australia is continued. Notations for hysteronotal fissures, kinds of gnathosoma,
solenidia, form of notal setae and shield sculpturing are presented. Comments are made on the
systematics of Macropylides in which the disbanding of the cohort Ptycimma is supported. The
included Arthronotina are divided into 3 new subcohorts: Monofissurae, Retrofissurae and
Profissurae. A new family, Trichthoniidae, is established. A new name, Neoliochthonius, is given to
Paraliochthonius Moritz not the pseudoscorpion genus Paraliochthonius Beier. New diagnoses are
given for some superfamilies, families and genera. In this study, 11 species were collected.
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SOILS.
3. ARTHRONOTINA (CRYPTOSTIGMATA)
by
DAVID C. LEE
South Australian Museum, Adelaide, South Australia 5000
(Manuscript accepted 3 July 1981)
ABSTRACT
LEE, D.C, 1982. Sarcopliformes (Acari) of South Australian soils.
1, Arthronouna (Cryptosuigmata), Ree 5S. dus Mus, 18 (15):
327-359,
A study of sarcoptiform mites from surface soil
(usually greatest depth = 4 cm) al 9 florally diverse
sites in South Australia is continued. Notations for
hysteronotal fissures, kinds of gnathosoma, solenidia,
form of notal setae and shicld sculpturing are pre-
sented, Comments are made on the systematics of
Macropylides in which the disbanding of the cohort
Ptyclimina is supported, The included Arthronotina
are divided into 3 new subcohorts: Monofissurae,
Retrofissurae and Profissurae, A new family, Tni-
chthoniidae, is established. A new name, Nealiovh-
thonius, is given to Paraliochthonius Moritz not the
pseudoscorpion genus Paraliochthonius Beier. New
diagnoses are given for some superfamilies, families
and genera. In this study, 11 species were collected.
Two species are new: Gehypochthoniuy yirenckei, Wer-
achthonius movritzi. Six species are newly recorded
from Australia: //ypochthoniella minutissima Berlese,
Brachychoehthenius elsosneadensis (Hammer), 8. cri-
coides Weis-Fogh, Trichthonius pulcherrimus (Ham-
mer), Phylozetes emmae (Berlese), Sphaerochthonius
splendidus (Berlese), Three species were previously
recorded from South Australia: Cosmochihonius aus-
tralicus Womersley and 2 which were misidentified:
Liochthonius simplex (Forsslund) as “'Brauchychthonius
ch perpusillus’, Liochthonius finibriatissimus (Hani-
mer) as “'Brachyvehthonius ef. horridus’'. The deserip-
lions of 4 species not collected in this study are
extended: Gehypachthonius rhadamanthus Jacat,
Hypochthontella borealis Jacot, Poecilochthonius par-
allelus (Womersley), Liochthonius longipilus (Wom-
ersley), Caosmochthonius wallworki and
Sphaerochthonius wallworki ave established for "'C.
sp.” Wallwork and “'S. sp." Wallwork, The synonymy
of Casmochthonius domesticus under C. lanatus by
van der Hammen is revoked. Three subspecies of
Coysmochthonius are given species status. New com-
binations are Gehypochthonius urticinus (Berlese) (ex
Parhypochtheamus), Poecilachthonius parallelus
(Womersley) (ex Brachychthonius), Liochthonius lon-
gipilus (Womersley) (ex Brachyehthonius), Perach-
thontus montanus (Hammer) (ex Kobrachychthontus)
Besides 2 new identifications above, Liochthonius
ocellaius: Hammer, 1958 is identified as L. /ongipilus
(Womersley).
INTRODUCTION
This publication is part of a previously introduced
study (Lee 1981) in which | indicated that | would
fallow Balogh’s (1972) classification. However,
although that classification 1s valuable because of its
comprehensive nature, in dealing with the Macropy-
lides or “Primitive Oribatei” it ignores parts of the
published work of Grandjean and van der Hammen,
In doing so it retreats from maturing the classifica-
lion. Therefore, although ihis paper is primarily con-
cerned with the Arthronotina, if includes a syste-
matics section on the Macropylides in order to explain
the higher classification used here, which is a modi-
fication of that presented by Grandjean (1969). Fur-
thermore, higher taxa are given endings similar to
those of Krantz (1978) in order to standardize the
differentiation of each level. It should also be noted
thai, contrary to common practice amongst acaralo-
gists, other zoologists follow Simpson (1945) in
regurding a cohort as a category between class and
order rather than between order and family.
In order to examine the optical activity of some
hairs, the Leitz microscope and interference contrast
device T normally used was modified for use as a
polarizing microscope by having a bright-lield con-
denser dise and objectives so that no Wollaston prisms
were in the beam path.
All material collected in this study is deposited in
the South Australian Museum, Adelaide, unless
stated otherwise.
NOTATION FOR MORPHOLOGY
The notation. followed is as previously presented
(Lee 1981), but comments are made below on the
notation for hysteronotal fissures and shields. kinds
of gnathosoma, solenidia, form of notal setae and
shield sculpturing.
Hysteronotal Fissures and Shields
On most adult Cryptostizmata the hysteronotum is
covered by a single continuous shield. The Arthro-
notina are unusual in that this integunient is broken
up into a series of shields separated by striated cuticle
which when it forms a narrow strip is referred to as
a fissure, In a description there is often a bias towards
deseribing one or the other. Descriptions of the dorsal
integument of Arthronotina are mainly biased towards
328
describing the transverse fissures. On the other hand,
the lateral integument is usually described in terms
of its shields. The latter can be confusing because a
shield may be described as absent either because it
is replaced by striated cuticle or because it is still
present but is not separated from the rest of the notal
shield by a fissure. The notation to be used is consid-
ered under two headings: (a) fissures, (b) shields (see
also Fig. 1).
(a) Fissures. The signature “B” (initial letter of
“break”, “F” having already been allotted) will be
used for a line separating one part of a shield from
another part that is either a strip of striated cuticle
or is regarded as representing what was a strip of
striated cuticle in some allied species. Fissures are
regarded as belonging to 5 categories: (i) acutely
hinged fissures, with articulated sides capable of
movement from a level position to enclose an angle
of 80° to 140°; (ii) Ainged fissures, with articulated
sides only capable of movement to enclose an angle
of 140° to 175°; (ili) complete fissures, with immovy-
able sides completely dividing a shield into separate
parts; (iv) partial fissures, not completely dividing
shield into separate parts; (v) relict fissures, no strip
of striated cuticle, but some demarcation furrow on
shield representing a fissure. The taxonomically
important fissures are the transverse hysteronotal
fissures of which there is a maximum of 3 (TBI,
TB2, TB3) each lying behind the same numbered
seta in hysteronotal file J. There may be transverse
lines behind seta J4 but these are not regarded as
representing strips of striated cuticle. Only one lateral
hysteronotal fissure is referred to: the dorsolateral
longitudinal fissure (LB). This separates what are
called pleural shields from the notal shields.
(b) Shields. On the hysteronotum there are a max-
imum four notal shields (NS1-4) and four subnotal
shields (SNS1-4) numbered from the anterior. The
subnotal shields have been referred to as “‘supra-
pleural” shields (Moritz 1976) but, since they some-
times merge with the notal shields as for example
shield SNS1 which bears seta S1, I have preferred
to relate them to the notal shield. Ventral to the
dorsolateral longitudinal fissure are the pleural
shields (PS1, 2) and subpleural shields (SPS1, 2).
Kinds of Gnathosternum
The 3 parts of the gnathosternum which contribute
to its general shape are the palp coxites, external
malae and mentum. In a few groups there is no
mentocoxal fissure so that the precise border between
the mentum and the palp coxites is not known. Grand-
jean (1957) regarded gnathosterna as belonging to 3
basic kinds (anarthric, stenarthric and diarthric), but
I have found it more useful to directly describe the
structures involved.
REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (15): 327-359
June, 1982
The following notation is introduced to describe
the external malae and mentum. Disjunct external
malae are well separated and lie either laterad or
dorsolaterad to the internal malae and the bases of
the preoral setae. Conjunct external malae lie
ventrolaterad to the internal malae and the bases of
the preoral setae, whilst a ridge indicates that the
protruding parts of the palp coxites from which they
originate come together midventrally behind the
internal malae. Coarctate external malae abut ven-
trad to the preoral setae, obscuring them from view.
An undelineated mentum has no distinct border with
the palp coxites because there is no mentocoxal fis-
sure, although, when this is true for members of the
primitive beetle mites, the mentum is probably trian-
gulate and sometimes ridges suggest its outline. A
triangulate mentum is almost triangular in outline
coming gradually to an anterior apex. The lateral
margins lie well behind both this apex and the cox-
otrochanteral joint of the palps. A quadrangulate
mentum is almost square or rectangular in outline,
usually with a straight, transverse anterior margin.
This shape results from a thickening of the lateral
margins of the mentum so that its anterior shoulders
move forward close to the coxotrochanteral articula-
tion of the palps.
A general statement can be made that the gna-
thosterna of Cryptostigmata have evolved from those
with disjunct external malae and an undelineated
mentum to those with coarctate external malae and
a quadrangulate mentum. The Arthronotina have
either disjunct or conjunct external malae and an
undelineated mentum.
Solenidia
Three of Grandjean’s established terms for soleni-
dia of certain shapes (baculiform, ceratiform and
piliform) (see Norton 1977) are used below. The term
“tactile” is replaced by flagelliform and the term
spiniform is used for stout evenly tapering solenidia.
Some solenidia are coupled with a seta, occupying
the same alveolus, whilst others are either associated
with a seta or well separated from any seta.
Although solenidia are usually dorsal, either | or
2 ventral solenidia have been recorded (Grandjean
1954b 1963, Covarrubias 1968, Reeves and Marshall
1971) on the tarsus I of some Brachychthoniidae,
Protoplophoridae and Sphaerochthoniidae. In describ-
ing a new species of Verachthonius below these solen-
idia were examined with polarized light and appeared
to fit the definition of solenidia, but are spiniform,
which is not a shape found amongst dorsal solenidia.
The symbol sov is used for these solenidia, and if in
a pair the anterior one is numbered first.
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SOILS
Form of Notal Setae and Shield Sculpturing
In identifying the Cosmochthonius species col-
lected in this study it was found that some attributes
of the form of the notal setae and shield sculpturing
had to be carefully delineated since these characters,
which may be trivial and inaccurately described in
some previous descriptions, had to be used because
few other data were available.
In describing the long hysteronotal setae, seta J3 is
always referred to and it is assumed that setae J4, Z3
and 24 are similar unless otherwise indicated. The
important attributes are the size and spacing of the
marginal files of cilia on the setae. Cilia are regarded
as even if each cilium is intermediate or equal in
length to the cilia on either side of it, and uneven if
this is not so. Cilia are short if less than diameter of
setal mid rib, medium-lengthed if * 1-x 1.25 and
long if more than x 1.25 this diameter. Cilia are
dense if distance apart is less than diameter of setal
mid rib, medium-spaced if * 1-x 1.25 and sparse if
more than X 1.25 this diameter.
The notal sculpturing consists of pits or puncta
which are described as punctations if circular or oval
and reticulations if polygonal, the straight edges
forming a network. Puncta are /arge if similar or
greater in size to setal base J3, or small. Puncta are
abutting if the space between them is not greater
than X 0.5 each one’s diameter, close if between
x 0.5-x 1 and well separated if greater than this
diameter.
SYSTEMATICS
Supercohort MACROPYLIDES
Remarks: Balogh (1972: 32) stated in referring to
his classification “The . . . Primitive Oribatei or
Macropylina is in complete accordance with van der
Hammen’s system (1959).” This is inaccurate. Van
der Hammen (1959) has 7 groups as follows (with
Balogh’s grouping in parentheses): Palaeacaroidea
(= Bifemoratina), Parhypochthonioidea (included in
Arthronotina), Enarthronota including Protoplophor-
idae (Arthronotina and part of Ptyctimina), Mesoplo-
phoroidea (= part of Ptyctimina), Phthiracaroidea
(= part of Ptyctimina), Perlohmannioidea (= part
of Holonotina) and Nothroidea including Nanher-
manniidae and Hermanniidae (= part of Holonotina
and part of the Apterogasterina in the Brachypylides
or “Higher Oribatids”’). Therefore, Balogh’s classifi-
cation differs in 2 important respects from that of
van der Hammen: it ignores the rejection of the
Ptyctimina as a valid group and changes the point of
delineation of the Macropylides from the Brachypy-
lides. Van der Hammen’s classification reflects that
of Grandjean who established both the Enarthronota
(Grandjean 1947a: 215) with the Protoplophora
329
included in it, and a classification (Grandjean 1954a:
428-431) which is a detailed precursor of van der
Hammen’s classification.
It is hard to understand how the Ptyctimina (recog-
nisable by the adult being ptychoid i.e. having an
acutely hinged prehysteronotal fissure) has survived
as a taxon for so long. Grandjean (1933: 319) pointed
out that Mesoplophora (ptychoid) has an adult gna-
thosternum remarkably like that of Hypochthoniidae
(non-ptychoid) and should be grouped with that fam-
ily rather than with the Phthiracaroidea (ptychoid).
It appears that the belief that Grandjean’s work is
based on characters of immature stages which pro-
duce a “natural” but difficult classification to follow
has inhibited the application of his work. For the
Macropylides this had led to an unnecessary stagna-
tion since much of Grandjean’s classification is based
on adult characters. Not that there is any basis for
regarding adult characters as producers of an “arti-
ficial” classification. The disadvantage of Balogh’s
currently accepted classification of the Cryptostig-
mata seems to be that it was based on descriptions
of adults which in many cases included too few char-
acters.
Although the classification by Balogh (1972) is
widely used and is included in a recent manual on
mites (Krantz 1978) some specialists do follow Grand-
jean’s work. Even then, there may be uncertainty as
when Norton (1980), in referring to Mesoplophora
and other ptychoid mites, states “these and several
other apparently unrelated oribatid mites” (my ital-
ics).
The classification used in this publication follows
the trend of Grandjean’s (1969) work. The Ptyctimina
are not regarded as a valid group. The Protoplopho-
roidea and Mesoplophoroidea (ex Arthroptyctima)
are grouped in 2 different new subcohorts within the
Arthronotina, The remaining majority within the dis-
banded Ptyctimina, the Phthiracaroidea and
Euphthiracaroidea (ex Euptyctima), is grouped in the
Holonotina which are not considered below.
Cohort ARTHRONOTINA
Diagnosis: Macropylides. Often pale, minute to
medium-sized (790 or less) adults. One, 2 or 3 trans-
verse hysteronotal fissures present (Mesoplophoridae
appear to lack these fissures, but the presence of only
8 pairs of setae on notal shield indicates that shield’s
posterior edge represents fissure 783, while posterior
and pleural shields inconspicuously merged with ven-
tral shields). External malae either disjunct or con-
junct. Mentum undelineated. Femora not divided into
2 separate parts. Immatures similar to adults except
sometimes in disposition of hysterosomal shields and
always in chaetotaxy and nature of genital shields.
330 REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (15): 327-359
Remarks: The most conspicuous attribute of mem-
bers of this cohort is the presence of transverse hys-
teronotal fissures breaking up the rigid integument
into a number of separate shields. Just as the form
of these fissures varies from a vague line to a hinged
break in the soma, so do their functions probably also
vary. In the case of Elliptochthonius profundus a
fissure probably allows bending of the soma in order
to negotiate narrow pore spaces in the deeper soil
layers, whilst for Protoplophora palpalis it allows the
back as well as the front of the mite to be folded
down to form a protective ball. The advantage of the
fissure is not so obvious for mites such as Hypo-
chthoniella minutissimus and Sphaerochthonius
splendidus, but possibly it allows expansion of the
hysterosoma to accommodate a large egg.
The attributes of morphological characters in the
Arthronotina vary considerably compared with those
of the other 2 cohorts of Macropylides. This is the
main reason for my establishing 3 new subcohorts
within it. One, the Monofissurae, represents a well
established taxon in that it includes only the Parhy-
pochthonioidea. On the other hand, the Retrofissurae
and Profissurae are entirely new taxa. It may prove
preferable to downgrade these 3 subcohorts to super-
families (Parhypochthonioidea, Mesoplophoroidea,
Protoplophoroidea). However, for the time being, the
novelty of the grouping, the strangeness of the 2 ex-
Ptyctimina superfamily names being applied to much
larger and diverse taxa, and my uncertainty as to the
importance of the differences between Phyllochthon-
ioidea and the other Retrofissurae, make my classi-
fication a reasonable stage in the maturing of the
systematics of the cohort.
If the grouping into taxa that I have called the
Retrofissurae and Profissurae survives, it will suggest
a number of cases of parallel evolution: the folding-
up-soma of the Mesoplophoridae and Protoplophori-
dae; the short, simple somal setae of the Brachy-
chthoniidae and Haplochthoniidae; the long erectile
mid-dorsal setae of the Trichthoniidae and Cosmo-
chthoniidae; and the large toadstool-like dorsal setae
of the Phyllochthoniidae and Pterochthoniidae.
The Arthronotina exhibit primitive attributes. On
the other hand, I regard some attributes as specialised,
such as slim setose external malae (e.g. Hetero-
chthonius gibbus) and comb-like fixed cheliceral digits
(e.g. Pterochthonius angelus), which are considered
by Grandjean (1947b 1957) as reflections of the setal
origins of these structures. Also, although the presence
of hysteronotal fissures on all species reflects the
primitive nature of the cohort, a greater number of
fissures may not be an indication of a more primitive
taxon.
June, 1982°
The classification of the Arthronotina that I propose
to use is outlined below.
A, Subcohort: Monofissurae
1. Superfamily: Parhypochthonioidea
Families: Parhypochthontidae
Gehypochthontidae
Elliptochthonidae
B. Subcohort: Retrofissurae
1. Superfamily: Hypochthonioidea
Families: Hypochthoniidae
Eniochthoniidae
Brachychthoniidae
Heterochthoniidae
Trichthoniidae
2. Superfamily: Mesoplophoroidea
Families: Mesoplophoridae
Archoplophoridae
3. Superfamily: Phyllochthonioidea
Families: Phyllochthoniidae
Atopochthoniidae
C. Subcohort: Profissurae
1. Superfamily: Cosmochthonioidea
Families: Cosmochthoniidae
Sphaerochthoniidae
Pterochthoniidae
Haplochthoniidae
2. Superfamily: Protoplophoroidea
Families: Protoplophoridae
KEY TO SUBCOHORTS OF ARTHRONOTINA (ADULTS)
1. Hysteronotal gland present. Only single transverse hyster-
onotal fissure (7B2) present. External malae conjunct. Both
pairs of adanal pores (Jaf, Zaf) present. Genua of legs with
| or 2 solenidia. Pretarsi with 3 claws (shorter central claw
sometimes rudimentary) Fits _ Monofissurae
Hysteronotal gland absent. More than | transverse hysteronotal
fissure (if only | is conspicuous it is either TB1 or TB3).
External malae either disjunct or conjunct. Either | pair of
adanal pores (Zaf) present or both pairs absent, Genua may
have 0, | or 2 solenidia. Pretarsi with 1, 2 or 3 claws (if 3
claws then central | most robust) ; pe:
2. Two (rarely only 783) transverse hysteronotal fissures (7B2,
TB3) so that both setae JI and J2 on first shield (NS1/2)
(an exception is Phyllochthonioidea, with toadstool-like dorsal
setae, broad areas of striated cuticle on hysteronotum and
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF SOLUTE AUSTRALIAN SOILS Ba
narrow first Shield nit bearing setu./2), External malae disjunct.
Fither | pair (4a// of adanal pores present or both pairs
absent, At Toust genua of legs Tand YW have | or 2 solenidia,
Pretarsi with enher | or 2 subequal claws Retrofissurae
Three (rarely only 7AI obvious: 782 obscure, 7'BS absent)
hysteronotal fissures (TBI, 7B2 TB4) so that-seta J) but not
Jon Sirst shield (NSE), External matic conjuncl Na adanal
pores, All genua without solenidia, Prelurs) with 1, 2-or 3
cluws but ib 2 elaws present. | usually much slimmer and
recly on pretarsis FV Profissurue
Subcohort MONOFISSURAE an.
Diagnosis: Arthronotina. Single transverse hyster-
onotal fissure (7'B2) complete ar hinged. Hysteronotal
gland with egress pore between setac 24 and 75.
Cowl absent or rudimentary, enclosing only part of
retracted chelicerac. Cheliceral digits unmodified,
dentate. Cheliceral setae both (cht, ef2) present and
setose, Distal plasmie setae on palp tarsus simple not
bifureate. External malie conjurct, Two pairs of
adanal pores (Jaf, Zaf) present. On tarsus 1, seta d/
never simple, at least bifureate. Genua of all legs
with | or 2 solenidia. Pretarsi with 3 claws of which
shorter central claw may be: rudimentary.
Remarks; The Monofissurae is not a mew taxon
since it includes only the Parhypochthonwwidea van
der Hammen, 1959, with the following 3 monogeneri¢
families: Parhypochthontidae, Gehypochthoniidae,
EMiptochthoniidac. Although Grandjean (19544) sep-
arated the Parhypochthonigidea from what is here
regarded as the rest of the Arthronotina, | prefer to
follow Balogh (1972) in placing itia the Arthronotina.
especially since the Elliptochthonudae partly “closes
the gap” be|ween the 2 taxa. As | gehypochthoniid
ayinph was collected in the present study, that family
15 considered in more detuil below. The 2 other families
aire considered brietly as Sollaws. i) Parhypochthoni-
due Grandjean, 1932b. Similur to Gehypochthoniidae
especially in the general appearance of the gnatho-
soma. However it is casily distinguished [rom other
Monofissurie by the egress pore of the hysteronotal
eland being on an apophysis and by the presence of
a setal file Sa which includes 4 setac, Parhypochihon-
fuy does have attributes in common with Ellipte-
chthonius thal do not accur on Gehypochthonius,
such as 3 palpocoxal setae, hysteronotal seta 24 pres-
ent and a solenidium on tibia IV, but these are
considered at the most to distinguish families. it)
Elliptochthunjidae Norton, 1975, When established it
was suggested that this family may in the future have
lo be grouped in a separate superfamily. Amongst
the combination of attributes used in the diagnosis,
it should be noled that the hinged transverse hyster-
Onotal fissure (Which merges laterally with the ventral
fissure immediately behind coxite LV so that the
posterior part of the body 1s movable in relation (o
the unterior part) oeeurs on members of the rhada-
monihussomplex in Gelhypochthonius, Also used to
diagnose the family was the gnathosoma which has a
number of substantially modified characters consid-
ering that the Monofissurae occupies a primitive pasi-
tion in the classification. The external malae ventrally
obscure much of the internal malaec and their palpo-
coxal bases abut onto each other for almost their
entire length. There is only one pair of adoral setae,
The palp is reduced in that the trochanter and femur
are fused and it carries few setae (1-0-2-7). The cowl
is extensive, although not completely enclosing the
retracted chelicerae. These gnathosomal altribules
alone support the suggestion that this family may
have Lo be grouped in a separate superfamily,
Family GEHYPOCHTHONIIDAE Strenzke
Gehypochthoniidae Strenzke, 1963; 251.
Type-genus: Gehypochthonius Jacot, 1936.
Remarks: The Gehypochthoniidae currently in
cludes only Gehypochthonius so that most further
points are made under that generic heading. Gel
pochthonius and Parhvpochthonius are closely allied.
I would group Gehypochthoniidae under Parhypo-
chthoniidae, but for the presence on Parhypochthon-
ius of 4 setae in file Sa. which is regarded as impor-
tant in representing a “preanal segment” (Grandjean
1954a) and is usually absent amongst the Arthrone
tina (exceptions: Pterochthoniidae and possibly Phyl-
lachthonioidea).
GEHYPOCHTHONIUS Jacot
Gehypochthonius Jacot, 1936; 22, Type designation
(original): “Gehvpochthonius rhadamanthus sp.nov.”
Type-species: Gehypochthonius rhadamanthus Jacot,
|936: 22.
Diagnosis: Monatissurae. Cowl absent. External
malae conjunct. Adoral setal file includes 3 pairs, of
which aol is. either bifurcate or spreads out distally
into-a triangulate fap. Palpocoxal setal file includes
2 pairs. Adanal setal file Sa absent.. Transverse lys-
teronotal fissure may or may not be hinged and merge
with a ventral fissure. Mysteronotal seta 24 absent
(present on larva, see Strenzke 1963; fig. 20). No
selae in adanal file Sia. Palp wiih 5 free segments
and 2 setae on femur. On tarsus [, bifurcate seta q!
with | branch tapering and 1 expanded into an oval
flap. Tibia TV without solenidia,
Morpholagy: Minute (250-380), pale ivory-winte
and someiimes partly straw-coloured, chelicerae light
brown. Soma bulbous behind seta /2 with clear,
medium-lengthed refractile setae sticking out like
spines. Legs | and IV longer than II and IU, |
stoutest,
Gnathosoma with conjunct external malae, internal
malae not partially obscured ventrally. Leg coxites
completely delineated by apodemes, although apo-
deme separating coxite 11] from IV sometimes bro-
ken.
332
REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (15): 327-359
June, 1982
FIGS. 1-4—Arthronotina: 1, signatures for hysteronotal shields and
fissures; 2, Gehypochthonius rhadamanthus Jacot, adult,
notum; 3, Gehypochthonius strenzkei n.sp., tritonymph, notum;
4, Hypochthoniella minutissimus Berlese, adult notum.
When transverse hysteronotal fissure hinged, ante-
rior hysteronotum narrower at the fissure and fits
into posterior hysteronotum. Similar to structure in
Elliptochthonius, but not to equivalent fissures of
most Arthronotina, where the posterior fits into ante-
rior hysteronotum.
Chaetotaxy. Soma: 2/, 2z, 2s; 6J, 5Z, 4S; 3ao, 2c,
led; 31, \Id, 217, 3111, 41V; 5 to 8Jg, 3Zg, 28g; 2Ja,
3Za, OSa. Appendages: ch(2), pa (0-2-0 or 1-2-11),
I (1-4 or 6-5-6-22), 7/7 (1-5-3 or 5-5 or 6-17), T/T (2-2
or 3-2 or 3-3 or 4-13 or 15), JV (1 or 2-2-1 or 2-3 or
4-11 or 13). Solenidia: pa (0-0-1), 7 (1 or 2-1-3), I/
(1-1-1 or 2), //7 (1-1-0), IV (1-0-0).
Hairs generally setose. Adoral seta aol either bifur-
cate or spreads out distally into triangulate flap, ao2
sometimes stout, blunt rod. Some somal and appen-
dage setae with inconspicuous cilia; plasmic seta z2
has conspicuous cilia and take | of 2 forms described
below under diagnoses of the 2 species-complexes.
Posterior hysteronotal setae always tapering distally,
but in some cases medially and proximally dilated
into a refractile cylinder around a central canal. Some
dorsal leg setae (as G. xarifae) lanceolate with lateral
flaps. Tarsus I, with seta dl short and bifurcate, 1
branch tapering and | ovate. If solenidia present on
a tarsus or tibia at least 1 is ceratiform or baculiform.
Solenidia of genua either piliform (sometimes slightly
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SOILS
blunter than surrounding setae and so approaching
ceratiform) or flagelliform,
Distribution: Possibly cosmopolitan—Canada (Nn),
Carolina and Florida (Na), France (Pe), Japan (Pc),
Maldive Islands (Or), Australia (Aa).
Remarks; The only species af Gehypachthonius
described extensively enough to refer Lo the gnatho-
soma and appendages is G. xarifae Strenzke, 1963,
Since the lateral view of the type-species (G. rhada-
manthus Jacot, 1936: fig. 1) is similar to that of
Elliprochthonius, 1 needed to establish whether or
not these 2 species were congeneric. because, although
the single iritonymph collected during this study is
congeneric with G. xarifae, it was not certain if either
species should be grouped in Gehypochthonius.
Strenzke (1963: 24%) has compared G. xarifae and
G, rhadamanthus, referring to Grandjean's unpub-
lished extensions of the description of G, rhadaman-
thus based on specimens collected in France, bul at
that time Elliptochthonius was not known.
To clarify the situation | examined both described
and undescribed mites not collected in the present
study. These, together with the material belore me,
confirm that. G. xarifae and rhadamanthus are sim-
ilar. However whilst regarding them as congeneric, |
place them in separate species-complexes, pending
upgrading or abandonment.
rhadamanthus-complex
Diagnosis: Gehypochthonius. Smaller (250-275),
Transverse hysteronotal fissure merges with ventral
fissure and appears hinged, Plasmic seta 22 with short
cilia (length »% 2 or less of setal diameter). Hyster-
onotal seta 72 more than * O.5 length of 82. Hys-
terondtal seta J5 less than * 2 length of J3 and
diameter never mare than that of outer rim of alveolus.
Setal file Jg with 5 or 6 setae. Adoral seta ao2
tapered as eo3. Appendage chaetotaxy reduced, for
example no setae on genu of palp and only 3 setae
on both tibiae [f1 and [V. One solenidium on genu
{, Solenidium on tibia TIL Jonger (at least % 1.1)
than the tibia. Solenidium on geno JV about twice
(x 1,9-2,1) Jength of the genu,
Remarks, As only | species is included, further
information 1s under the species heading. As noted
there, the species may be composite.
Gehypochthonius rhadamanthus Jacot
(Fig. 2)
Gehypochthonius rhadamanihus Jacot, 1936: 22.
Gehvpochthonius rhadamanthus Jacot: Aoki, 1975:
55.
Adult
Idiosomal length 250-275 (Carolina—255,
N.S.W.—250, Japan—262-275). Main cheliceral axis
334
apparently al less than 45° angle from horizontal
somal axis even in unsquashed specimens, Apodeme
separating coxite LI] from IV broken, Specimen from
Japan atypical (a8 original description) in that seta
Z2 longest in second rank. Seta J5 slimmest on Car-
olina specimens and stoutest (equal in diameter io its
alveolus) on N.S.W. specimens, Specimen (Fig. 2)
from Carolina differs compared with those from ather
localities in that setae /6 and 26 displaved forward.
Chaetotaxy of soma varies in that file Je has 6
setac On Carolina and Japanese specimens and 4 setae
on N.S.W. specimens. Chaetolaxy of appendages
(NLS.W. adults, and same on femora, genua and
tibiae of Carolina adults): pa (0-2-2-11), f (l-4-5--
22), HH (1-5-3-5-17), TM (2-2-2-3-13), FV (1 -2-1-3-1 1}.
Marerlal examined; Twenty-five svntypes
(“cotypes”, 34F23.2-5, Smithsonian Institution,
U.S.A.) from Carolina on single slide. One adult
(Ac8636, National Science Museum, Tokyo, Japan)
from Japan, Three adults (N19794.N 19796), litter and
soil. open £uca/pptus forest, Cordeaux (34° 08°S, 150°
43°E), New South Wales, Austraha, 9.6.1978, T.
Moulton.
Specimens from N.S.W. well cleared but squashed,
and characters of gnathosoma and appendages (some
presented under genus heading) clearly discernible,
Syntypes in good condition yet poorly cleared and
sometimes shrivelled. Most characters of gnathosoma
and appendages discernible, bul chaeiataxy of appen-
dages only confirmed on femur, genu and tibia, and
for solenidia alone on tarsi. Specimen from Japan
poorly cleared and shrivelled. Many characters of
gnathosoma and appendage chaetotaxy not discernible.
but attributes of transverse hysteronotal fissure, sete
72 and solenidia on tibia [II and genu LV justify its
inclusion in this. species-complex,
Distribution: Widespread—Carolina (Na), France
(Pe), Japan (Pc), Australia (Aa), The majority of
specimens examined by Jacot (1936) were from 5-
12.5 cms deep in the soil. Records of other specimens
are {fom soil of plant litter under shrubs or trees.
Remarks: G. rhadamanthus, with a hinged trans-
verse hysteronotal fissure and simpler setae, appears
adapted to live in deeper soil layers than its congeners
and therefore superficially resembles E//iptochthonius
species. If the morphological variations of this wide-
spread species later prove to reflect distinct species,
and the above diagnosis for the rhadamanthus-com-
plex remains valid, } would recommend that the genus
be limited to this complex alone.
xarifae-complex
Diagnosis: Gehypochthonius. Bigger (290-380).
Transverse hysteronotal fissure not merging with a
ventral fissure and not hinged. Plasmic seta 22 with
long cilia Vength of longest *% 5 or more of setal
334 REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (15): 327-359
diameter). Hysteronotal seta Z2 less than xX 0.5
length of S2. Hysteronotal seta J5 either more than
2 length of J3 or its diameter in parts greater than
that of outer rim of its alveolus, or both attributes
present. Setal file J/g with 7 or 8 setae. Adoral seta
ao2 blunt, spindle-shaped or parallel-sided rod.
Appendage chaetotaxy not so reduced, for example
| seta on palp genu and 4 setae on both tibiae Il
and IV. Two solenidia on genu I. Solenidium on tibia
Ill shorter (at most & 0.9) than tibia. Solenidium on
genu IV conspicuously shorter than twice (x 1.5 or
less) length of genu.
Material examined: Specimens of new species
below. Holotype of G. frondifer from Japan (Ac8567,
National Science Museum, Tokyo, Japan); notum
uppermost, slightly shrivelled, only partially cleared
and including 2 substantial opaque food boli, some
attributes difficult to discern.
Distribution: Widespread—Florida (Na), Maldive
Islands (Oc), Australia (Aa). From moss or plant
litter under shrubs or trees.
Remarks: Although little is known about Parhy-
pochthonius urticinus Berlese 1910a: 219 and fig. 43,
the dorsum of the female illustrated with egg is so
similar to that of members of this complex that it is
here included in Gehypochthonius.
Four species are included in the xarifae-complex:
G. frondifer Aoki, 1975; G. strenzkei nsp., G. urti-
cinus (Berlese, 1910a) n.comb., G. xarifae Strenzke,
1963.
Gehypochthonius strenzkei n.sp.
(Fig. 3)
Tritonymph
Idiosomal length 290 (1); appendage lengths—ch
27.5, pa 55, I 125, I 95, HT 95, IV 120; femur
breadths—pa 12.5, J 25, I7 15, IIT 15, IV 15, Trans-
verse hysteronotal fissure (782) indistinct, bearing
setae J2 and Z2, (fissure 782 of adults set behind
these setae). Indistinct disc around the hysteronotal
gland pore (AG) not illustrated. No indication of
vestigial presence of seta Z4. Five hysteronotal setae
(J4, J5, J6, Z3, Z5) have swollen, refractile zone,
but not setose seta Z6. Four of these 5 setae‘(all but
J6), on right side only, bear a ring-like refractile
structure, only present on seta J5 on left side. Opis-
thosternal chaetotaxy: 5/g, 3Zg, 2S'g, 2/a, 3Za, 0Sa.
Gnathosoma similar to that of adult G. xarifae except
adoral seta aol bifurcate with 2 tapering branches
that lack joining hyaline flap. Appendage chaetotaxy
and solenidiotaxy includes 6 setae on femur | and 4
setae on genu II but otherwise matches that of tri-
tonymph of G. xarifae. On genu IV, dorsal seta
simple and short (x 0.5 length of genu).
June, 1982
Adult
Idiosomal length about 350 (2—very squashed).
Similar to tritonymph except adult attributes as in G.
xarifae. There are further differences. Plasmic seta
z2 with 11 cilia in long-cilia file as adult G. xarifae,
but not its own tritonymph and G. frondifer which
have 14 or 15 such cilia. Some posterior hysteronotal
setae swollen and refractile as tritonymph, but lack
ring-like structures and have relatively longer slim,
tapering tips on some setae (J5, J6, Z5). Appendage
chaetotaxy and solenidiotaxy as adult G. xarifae
except only | seta on trochanter IV as tritonymph of
G. strenzke and xarifae. Differs from its own trito-
nymph in having 5 setae on genu IJ. Dorsal setae on
legs tend to be short and simple compared with long
lanceolate equivalent setae on adults of G. xarifae,
for example, on genu IV where solenidium about
x 1.2 length of genu, associated seta about x 0.5
length of genu (on G. xarifae solenidium about equal
to length of genu, associated seta about X 1.6 length
of genu with hyaline flap so that lanceolate).
Material examined: Holotype tritonymph (N19797),
litter and sparse grass, under Acacia sophorae, Pic-
caninnie Ponds, 3.7.1974, D. C. Lee. Two females
(N19798 and N19799), litter and soil, open Eucalyptus
forest, Cordeaux (34° 08’S, 150° 43’E), New South
Wales, Australia, 9.6.1978, T. Moulton.
Distribution: Australia (Aa). New South Wales:
sclerophyll forest, Great Dividing Range. South Aus-
tralia: Piccaninnie Ponds, coastal closed-scrubland,
ITN (-/8).
Remarks: G. strenzkei is based on 1 tritonymph
collected as part of this study, supported by what are
regarded as conspecific adults from N.S.W. Certain
characters, such as the number of cilia on plasmic
seta z2, suggest that the adults may belong to a
separate closely allied species. But the ring-like
refractile structures, which are not bilaterally sym-
metrical in their distribution amongst some hyster-
onotal setae of the tritonymph, are regarded as a non-
inherited attribute.
The shape of the posterior hysteronotal setae
clearly distinguishes G. strenzkei from urticinus and
xarifae on which such setae are much longer and
slimmer. Because G. xarifae is fully described, dif-
ferences in leg chaetotaxy and shape of hairs on leg
IV have been referred to above, but this is not pos-
sible for G. urticinus. The hysteronotal setae are
much more similar to those of G. frondifer, for which
I was unable to establish the leg chaetotaxy or shape
of hairs on leg IV. The main attribute I use to
distinguish this species from G. frondifer, is the setose
hysteronotal seta Z6. On G. frondifer seta Z6,
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF
uthough smaller, is distinctly swollen like J6. Fur-
thermore, although not conspicuous, the swollen hys-
teronatal setae such as J5 on G. frondifer are more
curved in outline with a shorter tapered Lip.
Subcohort RETROFISSURAE a.
Diagnosis: Arihronotina. Usually 2 transverse hys-
teronotal fissures (7R2, THF), sametimes obscure as
when hysteronotal setae so far towards anterior that
seta J4 set well within anterior half af hysteronotum
(Heterochthoniidae) or when notal setae broadly lan-
ceolate, spatulate or umbellate and extent of notal
shields considerably reduced (Phyllochthoninidea), or
only | fissure (7B3) present when prehysteronotal
fissure acutely hinged (Mesoplophorvidea), No hys-
teronotal gland with egress pore between setae 74
und 25, Cowl present, enclosing retracted chelicerae,
Cheliceral digits usually unmodified, sometimes
edentate. Cheliceral setae both usually present and
setose, sometimes ch] absent, rarely ch? enlarged,
lanceolate. One distal plasmic seta on palp tarsus
usually bifurcate, no such seta longer than tarsus.
External malae disjunct. Either | pair (Za/) of adanal
pores present or both pairs absent, On tarsus 1, seta
d1 simple or bifureate. At leasi genua [ and U1 with
1 or 2 solenidia. Peetarsi with cither | claw or 2
subequal claws.
Remarks; The Retrofissurae is a new taxon, Et is
very diverse in form and, as pointed out above in the
remarks on the cohort, the variations reflect similar
variations in the Profissurae suggesting the parallel
evolution of the 2 groups. The name Retrofissurac is
intended to indicate a main attribute thal contrasis
with the Profissurae, i.e, that the transverse hyster-
onotal fissures are usually more posterior, fissure TBI
not being represented, The most heavily weighted
attribute in this study is the presence of disjunct
external malae, a possibly primitive candition alsa
found in the Bifemoratina, but not elsewhere amongst
the Cryptostigmata, On the other hand, certain spe-
cies (see Trichthonius pulcherrintus below) have :
conspievously modified gnathosoma. The presence of
solemidia on jeg genud is an attribute common
amongst Cryptostigmata, contrasting with their
absence on members of the Protissurac. Attributes of
the adult claws also appear lo be a reliable diagnostic
feature although there are exceptions and they diag-
nose lower taxa amongst some other groups of Cryp-
lastigmata, The correlation of the attributes. of these
4 characters, with few exceptions, is considered here
us a good case fora new splitting of a large part of
the Arthronotina into the Retrolissurae and Prolis-
surae.
The Retrofissurae includes 3 superfamilies: Hypo-
chthonioidea Balogh, 1961; Mesoplophorojdea van
der Hammen, 1959; Phyllochthonioidea Traye’, 1967.
The Hypochthonioidea include most members of this
SOUTH ALSTRATIANS Sots j45
subcohort, and since some were callected iq this
study, they are considered further below. The Meso-
plophoraidea. which only include 2 genera and about
7 species, were considered briefly by myself (Lee
1981) under the now disbanded Arthroptyctima. The
Phyllochthonioidea are considered below in these
remarks, allhough none were collected in this study.
The superfamily Phyllochthonioidea Trave, 1967
LO3 is 4 group of minute (length 200-340) pale mites
with large dilated umbellate dorsal setue. Arope-r
chthonius artiodactvius Grandjean, 1948 was
described as the type und only species of Alopo-
chthoniidae with a Holaretic distribution across
southern Canada (No), Mediterranean region (Pm)
and forest zones of Western Europe (Pe), as fur us
the Altai Mountains in Mongolia (Ps). A second spe-
cies (Phylochrhonins aourii Trave, 1967) from the
Ivory Coast (Ew) was established us the type of
Phyllochthontidae. This family has since been recorded
fram broad-leaved forests in southern Eurasia (Fs)
and the far east of the U.S.S.R. (Ps), The 2 genera
ure similar in appearance although their chaetotaxy
differs. For example, 4. artiodacty/us las a gnatho-
soma very similar to that of P. aourti, but lacks 2
setal pairs (aol, clp). The hysterosainal chaetotaxy
is confused because Grandjean (1948) regards seta
J/2 as absent so that the large erectile seta (third in
file J) is labelled “/V. whilst Travé (1967) labels it
“el, There are more hysterosomal setue on P. aowtii
and, if Grandjean (1948) is correct in considering the
second hysteronolal rank to be absent, then setul ile
Sais present on this species. [t may prove preferable
to group these 2 genera in 1 family, bul for the Lime
being | have retained both families because the pres-
ence or absence of setal file Sa has in the pust been
given considéruble weight on the basis that it reflects
the presence or absence of a “preanal segment’ (see
above remarks on Gehypochthoniidae).
The Phyllovhthonjoidea are unusual jn their attri
butes. of 2 of the 4 characters which are Weighted in
the diagnosis of Reirofissurae and this makes its
grouping with the other 2 superfamilies questionuble,
The 2 atiributes are that there is a fissure (? TBI)
close behind seta /| and the pretarsus has 2 claws
rather than | chiw, Bul it should be noted that the
hysteronotal shields are considerably reduced and that
the 2 claws are stout and symmetrical, whilst, when
2 eluws are present on Profissurae species, they (are
known exeeption) are assymmetrical with | hyaline
and slim as for the lateral claws of allied species and
the obhér refractile and stout us for the central chkiw
(rarely the 2 claws are more similar in girth, in which
case the slimmer claw is cilute),
Superfamily HYPOCHTHONIOIDEA
Diagnosis: Retrofissurae. Prehysteronotal fissure rot
aculely hinged, Two narrow Lransverse fissures (7 B82.
336
TB3) dividing hysteronotal shield into 3 parts. Dor-
solateral longitudinal fissure (LB) anterior to seta J5
delineates dorsal margin of pleural shield, ventrally
separate from aggenital and adanal shields. Notal
setae rarely broadly umbellate with J3 extending
beyond posterior edge of soma, if so then ciliate.
Pretarsus with 1 claw.
Remarks: The Hypochthonioidea as used here is a
more extensive superfamily than as delineated by
Balogh (1972) and includes 5 families: Hypochthon-
iidae Berlese, 1910a; Eniochthoniidae Grandjean,
1947a; Brachychthontidae Thor, 1934; Heterochthon-
iidae Grandjean, 1954a; Trichthoniidae n.f. The
Hypochthoniidae and Heterochthoniidae were not
represented in collections for this study and are not
further considered.
Family ENIOCHTHONIIDAE Grandjean
Eniochthoniinae Grandjean, 1947a: 223.
Type-genus: Hypochthoniella Berlese, 1910a.
Remarks: The Eniochthoniidae currently include
only Hypochthoniella so that most further points are
made under that generic heading. The family is closely
allied to the Hypochthoniidae. These 2 families are
usually regarded as the only members of the Hypo-
chthonioidea.
HYPOCHTHONIELLA Berlese
Hypochthoniella Berlese, 1910a: 218. Type designa-
tion (original): “H. (Hypochthoniella) pallidulus
K.”, misidentification of Hypochthonius minu-
tissimus Berlese, 1903 subsequently indicated as
type (van der Hammen 1959: 17).
Arthrochthonius Ewing, 1917: 130. Type designation
(original): ‘“Hypochthonius pallidulus Koch”,
misidentification as type designation for Hypo-
chthoniella,
Eniochthonius Grandjean, 1933: 32. Type designation
(original): ‘“Eniochthonius pallidulus (Mich.)”,
Hypochthonius pallidulus Koch: Michael, 1888:
537 syn. with Hypochthonius minutissimus
Berlese, 1903 (see van der Hammen 1959: 17).
Type-species: Hypochthoniella minutissima (Berlese,
1903: 252),
Diagnosis: Hypochthonioidea. Minute (280-385),
pale mites. Anterior of 2 transverse hysteronotal fis-
sures (7B2) relict, not continuous across mid-notal
line and conspicuously closer to seta /2, than seta J3,
posterior fissure (7'B3) about halfway between seta
J\ and J6. Anterior part of pleural shield (PS1) not
separated off by vertical fissure level with transverse
hysteronotal fissure 7B3. Hysteronotal setae J3 and
Z3 subequal in length to setae J2 and Z2, setose and
never longer than distance between setal bases J/1
and J3, Hysteronotal seta S2 not as near to mid-notal
REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (15): 327-359
June, 1982
line as Z1. Pair of merged coxites II] and IV also
merge with each other across mid-sternal line. No
proteronotal eye or eyes in zone between setae j1 and
zl. On tarsus I, bifurcate seta dl with 1 branch
tapering and | expanded into small disc. Adoral file
includes 3 setae of which ao2 has distal teeth.
Material examined: Other than the specimens of
H. minutissima, | syntype of H. borealis (“cotype”,
37F1w-4, Smithsonian Institution, U.S.A.) from New
Hampshire on a slide. This specimen slightly curled
up, dorsal surface uppermost, well cleared and despite
granular integument most attributes of dorsal and
ventral surfaces distinguishable except on gnathosoma.
Probably female since positor has long distal setae.
Distribution: Widespread in temperate regions (Nn,
Na; NTc; Em; Pe, Pm, Ps, Pc; Os; Aa, An) with
some indication that its members commoner in fer-
mantation or deeper soil layers, where there is a
substantial leaf-litter layer as in forests, woodland or
scrubland.
Remarks: The most data on Hypochthoniella is to
be gleaned from Grandjean’s work (see below) on the
type-species. The brief description of H. borealis
clearly distinguishes it from the type-species, stating
that it is larger (about 385) and has a notal plasmic
seta z2 with only 4 or 5 short cilia (their length is
about half that of the broadest width of the seta). I
was uncertain as to whether or not H. borealis was
grouped in the correct genus, but the disposition of
somal shields is very much as on H. minutissima and
both species have a large pore posterior to the ace-
tabulum for leg IV.
Two species are included in Hypochthoniella: H.
minutissima (Berlese, 1903); H. borealis (Jacot, 1939).
Hypochthoniella minutissima (Berlese)
(Fig. 4)
Hypochthonius pallidulus Koch: Michael, 1888: 537.
Hypochthonius minutissimus Berlese, 1903: 252.
Hypochthonius (Hypochthoniella) pallidulus Koch:
Berlese, 1910a: 218
Eniochthonius pallidulus: Michael not Koch: Grand-
jean, 1933: 32,
Eniochthonius grandjeani van der Hammen, 1952:
13.
Female
Dull ochre, becoming orange at shield edges. Inte-
gument appears granular even in well cleared speci-
mens. Refractile parts (external malae, cheliceral
extremities, setae and claws) at least as pale as general
integument. Idiosomal length 315 (25 ex Piccaninnie
Ponds, 280-360); appendage lengths (for 320 not con-
taining an egg)—ch 20, pa 50, J 115, 77 110, 7/7 95,
IV 115; femur breadths—pa 10, J 17.5, If 17.5, IT
17.5, 7 15, IV 15. Prehysteronotal fissure appears
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OP SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SOILS 337
hinged and expandable so that, in relation to hyster-
osomna, propodasama can move up and down through
about 10°, and backwards and forwards over about
20um. Anterior transverse hysteronotal fissure {7B2)
relict, appearing to be shallow furrow on inner surface
of integument, Posterior transverse hysteronotal fissure
(TB3) hinged. In specimen illustrated (Fig. 4), pos-
terior edge of anterior shield consists of both dorsal
complete line and ventral broken, line level with seta
J3, whilst anterior edge of the posterior shield (which
can be in forward position, level with seta J3) in
backward position level with dorsal postenor edge of
anterior shield. Specimens contain up to 3 food boli,
anterior | usually diffuse, including what appears to
be fungal hyphae and spores. All positors obseryed
have stout long distal setae as an females with eggs,
50 all adults regarded as female, Amongst 25 regis-
tered females examined in detail, 15 without eggs,
whilst 10 contain single large (length about | 30)
ellipsoidal egg. Average length of females with eggs
1() greater than those without.
Material examined: Twenty-five females
(N1979150-N1979174), litter and sparse grass, under
Acacia sophorae, Piccaninnie Ponds, 37.1974 and
208.1975, D. C, Lee, One female (N1979175), litter
and sparse moss, under Eucalyptus incrassata, Fer-
ries-McDonald, 206.1974, D. C. Lee. One female
(N19791 76), litter and sparse moss, under Eucalyptus
obliqua, Mi Lofty, 9.5.1974, D. C. Lee.
Distribution: Widespread, as for genus, South Aus-
tralia: Ferrries-MeDonald, mallee-broombush open-
scrubland, | (1/8); Piccaninnie Ponds, ¢oastal closed-
scrubland, 60 (6/8), Mt Lofty, sclerophyll open-for-
est, | (1/8).
Remarks: Confusion over the nomenclature relat-
ing to this species and its genus results from Mypo-
chthonius paltlidulus Koch, 1836; 3 (20) being the
nymph of H, rufulus Koch, 1836: 3 (19) (syn, Grand-
jean 1933: 32), whilst Hl. pallidulus Koch; Michael,
1888; 537 is Hypochthoniella minutissima.
The most informative descriptions of A. miinutis-
sima (as Eniochthonius pallidulus) are by Grandjean:
development of ventral region of soma (Grandjean
1933) development of lateral region of soma (Grand-
jean 1934): structure of seta d1 on tarsus | (Grand-
jean 1941); setation of genua (Grandjean 1942); gna-
thosonya (Grandjean 1957); solenidiotaxy (Grandjean
1964). The external morphology of this species, and
so this family, is still incomplete in that for example,
the leg chaetotaxy is not fully described.
Family BRACHYCHTHONUDAE Thor
Brachychthoniidae Thor, 1934: 115.
Type-genus: Brachychthonius Berlese, 1910a-
Diagnosis; Hypochthonioidea. Minute (130-270),
pale mites. Two complete transverse hysteronotal fis-
sures (782, 783), anterior fissure (7B2) never con
spicuously closer to seta J2 than ta J3, posterior
fissure (783) about halfway between seta J1 and J6
or posterior to that position. Anterior part of pleural
shield (PSL) separated off by vertical fissure level
with transverse hysteronotal fissure 763 Hysterono-
tal setae J3 and Z3, not more than * 1,5 length of
setae J2 ot Z2, setose, ciliate or lanceolate and never
longer than distance between setal bases J1 and J3.
Hysteronotal seta 52 as near to mid-notal line as Z1
or nearer, Pair of merged coxites IT and TV do not
merged with each other across mid-sternal line, No
proiernotal eye or eyes jn zane between setae /! and
21. On tarsus |, seta d1 simple, Adoral file usually
includes | seta (a02), reduced seta ao3 rarely present
(Neabrachyehthonius).
Material examined: Other than species collected
during present study. brachychthoniid mites previ-
ausly recorded from South Australia (Womersley
1945) also considered. Two species represented in
both collections, 2 in Womersley’s work alone and 3
in just this study, making 7 species altogether.
Distribution. Widespread, probably cosmopolitan
(Niedbala 1972b 1977, Chinone 1978) and if wide
variety of habitats especially moss, plant litter, and sail
Remarks: The Brachychthoniidae are by far the
largest family in the Arthronotina whilst exhibiting
relatively little morphological diversity. Balogh (1972)
included 5 genera. | fallow a classification of European
brachychthoniids (Moritz 1976a, [976b) including 10
genera which, although it may be excessively divided,
works Well in classifying the material before me. One
problem in classifying brachychthoniids is that the
descriptions of many included species are toa brief.
For example, the leg chaetotaxy is known for very
few Species, as tabulated with the redeseription of
Brachychovhthonius lydiae by Reeves and Marshall
(1971), which refers to all of the more compleie
descriptions of brachychthoniids.
Niedbala (1972a, 1973) recognised 7 genera
amongst which he attempted to establish phylogenetic
relationships. Eobrachychthonius was regarded as (he
Most primitive because of its 4 subnotal shields, whilst
other genera Were tore or less advanced depending
on the degree of either loss or fusion of these shields
with the notal shield or each other. Furthermore, the
family was regarded as having evolved along 2
branches: Poecilachthonjus and Svnchthonius consti-
tuting a minor branch in which 4 Jurrow indicates
the line of merging of 2 subnotal shields (SNS2 and
SNS3), The similarities of Poecilochthonius to Bra-
vhychachthonius and of Synachthonius to Liochthonius
were regarded as “convergent similarity” and not due
ia “ways of evolution”
338 REC. S. AUST. MUS.,
| have found it useful to newly group the 10 genera
of Brachychthoniidae in 3 genus-complexes as follows:
1) Brachychthonius-complex— Brachychochth-
ochnius Jacot, 1938; Brachychthonius Berlese,
1910a; Eobrachychthonius Jacot, 1936; Poecilo-
chthonius Balogh, 1943,
2) Liochthonius-complex—Liochthonius van der
Hammen, 1959; Mixochthonius Niedbala, 1972a;
Spachthonius van der Hammen, 1952; Verach-
thonius Mortitz, 1976a.
3) Neobrachychthonius-complex— Neobrachy-
chthonius Moritz, 1976b; Neoliochthonius n. name
(for Paraliochthonius Moritz, 1976a).
The genera are considered below only if their rep-
resentatives have been collected in South Australia,
on the other hand all the genus-complexes are con-
sidered. The 2 characters heavily weighted in diag-
nosing the genus-complexes are the presence or
absence of a fissure separating off the anterior subnotal
shield (SNS1) and the position of hysteronotal seta
Z2. Normally the position of the anterior 2 ranks of
hysteronotal setae of Arthronotina ts that the 3 files
are well spaced and sub-parallel, but in the Brachy-
chthoniidae, seta S2 is always displaced towards mid-
notal line, whilst Z2 is sometimes similarly displaced.
Key to Genera of Brachychthoniidae
|. Hysteronotal seta Z2 displaced towards mid-notal line, base at
least X 2 its own diameter away from line joining setae S2
and Z3. Anterior subnotal shield (SNS1) may or may not be
separate from hysteronotal shield 2
Hysteronotal seta Z2 not displaced towards mid-notal line, base
on or close to line joining setae S2 and Z3. Anterior subnotal
shield (SNS1) separate from hysteronotal shield. Brachy-
chthonius-complex 3
2. Anterior subnotal shield (SNS1) separate from hysteronotal
shield. Neobrachychthonius-complex 6
Anterior subnotal shield (SN.S1) merged with hysteronotal shield.
Liochthonius-complex 7
3. Longitudinal furrow delineates, without separating off, marginal
parts of hysteronotal shield bearing setae Z1, S2, Z2, 23, Z4,
Four separate subnotal shields present, Adanal seta Za2 con-
spicuously stouter than Zal and Za3. Pair of merged coxites
Il] and IV also merge with each other across mid-sternal
line Eobrachychthonius
No such longitudinal fissure on hysteronotal shield as above.
Two or 3 separate subnotal shields present. Adanal setae Zal
and Za2 similar, either both slim like Za3 or both stout. Pair
of merged coxites II] and IV separated by fissure along mid-
sternal line 4
4. Adanal setae in file Za similarly slim, although Za2 may be
slightly longer than other 2 setae Brachychthonius
Anterior 2 adanal setae in file Za conspicuously longer and/or
stouter than Za3 5
5. Three subnotal shields (SNS4 present). Adanal seta Jal on
striated cuticle or narrow oval shield Brachychochthonius
Two subnotal shields (S/'V.S4 absent). Adanal seta Jal on broadly
triangulate shield Poecilochthonius
6. Two palpocoxal setae (clp absent). Adoral seta ao2 tapers to
distal end. Proteronotal plasmic seta z2 broadens distally into
18 (15): 327-359 June, 1982
a subspherical ciliate ball. Subnotal shield SNS3 merges with
hysteronotal shield Neoliochthonius
Three palpocoxal setae (clp present). Adoral seta ao2 stout and
distally dilated. Seta z2 broadens distally into oval ciliate ball
with longitudinal axis at least X 2 greatest transverse axis.
Subnotal shield SNS3 separate from hysteronotal
shield Neobrachychthonius
7. Subnotal shield SNS3 merges with hysteronotal shield or absent.
Posterior setae in hysteronotal file J spaced normally, /6
nearly level with Z6 in relation to posterior margin of hyster-
onotal shield. Adoral seta ao2 slim and tapering
Liochthonius
Subnotal shield SNS3 separate from hysteronotal shield. Posterior
setae in hysteronotal file J almost as Liochthonius or compacted
forward, J6 level with point midway between Z5 and Z6 in
relation to posterior margin of hysteronotal shield. Adoral seta
ao2 \anceolate or parallel sided with blunt distal end 8
8. Hysteronotal setae conspicuously ciliate. Seta /6 more nearly
level with seta Z6 in relation to posterior margin of hysteronotal
shield than to point midway between Z5 and Z6. Adoral seta
ao2 broadly lanceolate Mixochthonius
Hysteronotal setae never conspicuously ciliate. Seta /6 nearly
level to point midway between ZS and Z6 in relation to
posterior margin of hysteronotal shield. Adoral seta ao2 parallel
sided with blunt distal end 9
9. Adanal seta Za2 conspicuously longer and stouter than Zal and
Za3. Three setae in aggenital setal file Jg (/Jg4 absent). Two
setae on both genu III and IV Synchthonius
Adanal seta Za2 and Zal similar, either both slim or both stout,
although Za2 may be slightly longer. Four setae in aggenital
setal file J/g (Jg4 present), Three setae on both genu III and
lV Verachthonius
BRACHYCHTHONIUS-complex
Diagnosis: Brachychthoniidae. Anterior subnotal
shield (SNS1), bearing seta S1, separate from hys-
teronotal shield. Hysteronotal setae Z1, S2, Z2 andZ3
in nearly straight line parallel to lateral margin of
notal shield because seta Z2 not displaced towards
mid-notal line. Subnotal shield SNS3 separate from
hysteronotal shield. Adoral seta ao2 parallel-sided
with blunt distal end. Three setae on both genu III
and IV (1 ventral seta present). Coxite IV bearing 4
setae.
Remarks: The Brachychthonius-complex is made
up of 2 groups: Eobrachychthonius and the other 3
genera. Eobrachychthonius is not closely allied to the
other genera, but it is useful to group them together
because of the similar position of hysteronontal seta
Z2, 1 of the most important characters referred to in
the briefer descriptions. Eobrachychthonius is hardly
sculptured at all on its notum, but its hysteronotal
shields have a marginal strip delineated by a furrow.
The other 3 genera usually have strongly sculptured
hysteronotal shields with a marginal ridge. Possibly
these 2 types of marginal zonation are reflected in
the similar lack of displacement of seta Z2 towards
the mid-notal line so that it remains on the margin.
The marginal ridges also appear in this genus-complex
to be correlated with the position of the posterior
setae in file J, since they often end posteriorly in a
SARCOPTIPORMES (ACARI) OF SOUTH ALSTRALEAS SOILS 4
pair of tubercles bearing setae /6, which in turn are
usually more antertorad, file J being compacted for-
ward,
Eohrachychthoanius montanus Hammer, 1952 does
not (it into that genus wor the rest of this penus-
complex, but is tentatively newly combined below
with Ferachthonius,
Pour genera are included in the Brachychthonius-
complex: Brachychthanius Berlese, 1910a, Brachyp-
chochihonius Jacot, 1938; Eobrachyehthonius Jacot,
1936: Poecilachthonius Balogh, 1943 Only Brachy-
chochthonius and Poecilochthonius fave been col-
lected in South Australia und ure considered below.
BRACHYCHOCHTHONIUS SJacot
Brachychochthonius Jacot, 1938: 130. Type desig-
nation (original): “Brachvehochthonius jugatus
sp.nov.”
Selinickochthonius Krivolutsky, 1964; 935, Type des-
ignation (original): “Brachyehthonius celawaten-
vis Sellnick’',
Brachvehthonius Berlese: Chinone and Aoki, 1972:
223 (in part). Type indication, “Brachychthonius
berlesei Willmann, 1928", correct identification
of “A, brevis (Mich): Berlese 1910a (sce van
der Hammen 1959; 19),
Type-species: Brachychochthonius jugalus Jacot,
1938; 130,
Diagnosis: Brachychthonins-complex. — Hystero
notal shields without marginal longitudinal furrows,
so that shield bearing setae Z!, 82, 22, 73 and 24
not delineated from more central part. Three subnotal
shields (SNS1, SNS3, SNS4) separate from hyster-
onotal shields. Pair of merged coxites II] and IV
separated by fissure along mid-sternal line. Adanal
seta Jal on striated cuticle or narrow oval shield.
Anterior 2 adanal setae in file Za conspicously longer
and/or stouter than Za3. Posterior setae in hyster-
onotal file J compacted forward so that /6 level with
seta 25 in relation to posterior margin of hysteronotal
shield.
Distribution: Widespread, probably cosmopolitan.
Remarks: Brachychochthonius species separate out
best under Sellnickochthanius in the keys of Balogh
(1972), It is difficult to establish how many nominal
species should be included in this genus because a
number of possible members are known only by char-
acters of their notal surface, which is insufficient to
distinguish them from Brachychthonius and Poecil-
ochthonius, Also, in the comprehensive list by Nied-
bala (1972), species of these 3 genera are all grouped
in Brachychthonius. When Moritz (1976b) established
the concept off this taxon as used here, he included
12 speeies from Europe and later Chinone (1978)
included a further 5 species from Japan also Brachy'-
chochthonius lydiae Jacot from North America ts
returned to this genus. Therefore, with at least 15
species. il may be the largest genus in the Brachy-
chthonius-complex. Two species (8. el/sesneadensis
and A. ericoides) in Brachvehochthonius have been
collected in South Australia and are considered below.
Brachychochthonius elsosneadensis (Hammer)
(Fig. nane)
Brachychthonius elsosneadensiy Hammer, 20,
Brachyehthonius elsosneadensis Wammer: Chinone
und Aoki, 1972: 229.
Female
Shields either dull orange or almost straw-coloured
or pale ivory white. Durker orange specimens some-
times with adhesive, dirly exudate conspreuous al
posterior end of soma, Idjosomal length 165 (25 ex
Piccaninnie Ponds, 142.5-177.5); appendage lengths
(for 165 nul containing egy)—ch 5. pu 20, 7 47.5, 1
40, 111 45, 7 S75: femur breadths—pa 5S, J 14. 1
Vl. 7 11. 7 13, Adults from Met. Lotty and Katt
Hill with idiosomal length within 162.5-182,5, All
posilors observed appeared similar to those of speeci-
mens containing ceg, therefore all adults regarded as
female. Amongst 25 females (ex Piccaninnic Ponds),
8 included 1 or 2 boli, Boli light or dark brown,
homogencously granular, level with or posterior to
genital shields. Nine included single ellipsoidal cee
with length within 70-92.5 Females with epgs
uppeared futter but not longer than those without
cee.
Material examined: Twenty-five females
(N1979177-N1979201), litter and sparse grass. under
Acacia sophorae, coastal scrubland, Piceaninnic
Ponds, 3.7.1974 and 20.8.1975, D. C. Lee Five
females (N1979202-1979206) litter und sparse moss,
under Eucalyptus obliqua, Mt. Lofty, 95.1974, D.
C. Lee, Five females (N1979207-N1979211) liver,
under Pinus pinea, Knowl Hill, 225.1974, D.C, Lee.
Distribution, Argentina (NT¢), Japan (Pe), South
Australia (Aa) Sauth Australia: Pidcaninnie Ponds.
coastal clased-scrubland, 35 (8/8), ML, Lofty, selero-
phyllopen-forest, 13 (4/8); Knott Hill, oultivated pine
forest, 6 (2/2).
Remarks: As the hysteronotal setae JT and /2 are
selose, they differ from the larger seta /3 that has
lateral hyaline flaps giving it a lanceolate shape,
which distinguishes &. e/yosneadensis from all other
possibly congeners except 8. elisabethae (Mahunka,
1974: 211) from Rhodesia (Ee). 8. e/sosneadensis is
distinguishable from &. elfsabethae in having & cou-
spicuous hysteronotal pare Af] and narrower
(breadth:length=0,3 or less:]) seta ./3.
340
Brachychochthonius cricoides (Weis-Fogh)
(Fig. none)
Brachychthonius cricoides Weis-Fogh: 1948: 269.
Brachychthonius cricoides Weis-Fogh: Evans, 1952:
236.
Brachychochthonius cricoides (Weis-Fogh: Moritz,
1976b: 287).
Female
Shields pale straw-coloured. Idiosomal length 142.5
(5 ex Mt. Lofty and Knott Hill, 135-147.5); appendage
lengths (for 145 ex Mt. Lofty)—ch 7.5, pa 20, 1 45,
1 40, IH 42.5, IV 47.5; femur breadths—pa 6.25, J
10, 77 8.75, JIT 8.75, IV 10. Specimens from Knott
Hill have weak notal sculpturing, only a faint ridge
associated with setal file J, a scalloped transverse
ridge between tubercles bearing setae /6, and a line
between setae zl and sl. Specimens from Mt. Lofty
have more complex notal sculpturing as illustrated
for this species by Moritz, 1976b, but not as conspic-
uous as for B. elsosneadensis. Hysteronotal pore hf
large, with conspicuous encircling refractile ring. One
pale homogeneous granular bolus observed. Positors
relatively small, involuted tubes forming a ring (diam-
eter 10-12.5). No eggs seen, all adults assumed female.
Materials examined: Three females (N1979212-
N1979214); litter and = sparse moss, under
Eucalyptus obliqua, sclerophyll forest, Mt. Lofty,
9.5.1974, D. C. Lee. Two females (N1979215,
N1979216), litter, under Pinus pinea, Knott Hill,
22.5.1974, D. C. Lee.
Distribution; Denmark, Czechoslovakia, England,
Germany, Italy, Sweden, Poland (Pe); Asiatic USSR
(Ps); South Australia (Aa). South Australia: Mt.
Lofty, scleropyll open-forest, 3 (2/8); Knott Hill, cul-
tivated pine forest, 2 (1/2).
Remarks: B. cricoides is minute and pale, with
faint sculpturing, short setose notal setae and a very
conspicuous hysteronotal pore (Af1). The following 5
species are similar: B. aokti (Chinone, 1974); B. jacoti
(Evans, 1952); B. mivauchii Chinone, 1978; B. rotun-
datus Hammer, 1958; B. suecicus Forsslund, 1942.
B. cricoides is more precisely distinguishable in that
it has rostral teeth, lacks fine punctuations in the
median delineated areas of the proteronotal sculptur-
ing, proteronotal seta z1 is without cilia and hyster-
onotal setae are short (J2 is about 0.35 & the distance
between its bases; /3 is about 0.75 & the distance
between its bases).
POECILOCHTHONIUS Balogh
Poecilochthonius Balogh, 1943: 22. Type designation
(original): ““Poecilochthonius italicus (Berl.)”.
Poecilochthonius Balogh: Moritz, 1975b: 248.
Type-species: Poecilochthonius italicus (Berlese,
1910a: 220).
REC, S. AUST, MUS., 18 (15): 327-359
June, 1982
Diagnosis; Brachychthonius-complex. Hysteronotal
shields without marginal longitudinal furrows, so that
shield bearing setae Zl, $2, Z2, Z3 and Z4 not
delineated from more central part. Two subnotal
shields (SNS1, SNS3) separate from hysteronotal
shields. Pair of merged coxites III] and IV separated
by fissure along mid-sternal line. Adanal seta Jal on
broadly triangulate shield (width of broad anterior
end =X 2.5 length of Jal), Anterior 2 adanal setae
in file Za conspicuously longer and/or stouter than
Za3. Posterior setae in hysteronotal file J compacted
forward, so that seta J6 in zone (breadth =x 0.5
distance Z5-Z6) centred on point midway between
ZS and Z6 in relation to posterior margin of hyster-
onotal shield.
Distribution: Widespread, Greenland (Nn); Argen-
tina (NTc); Austria, Germany, Hungary (Pe); Italy,
Yugoslavia (Pm); Japan (Pc); South Australia (Aa).
Remarks: Poecilochthonius species separate out to
the couplet including Brachychthonius and Syn-
chthonius in the key of Balogh (1972). No mites in
the present study are grouped in this genus, but a
species has been recorded from South Australia. Mor-
itz (1976b) excludes 1 species, Brachychochthonius
hungaricus (Balogh, 1943), originally included in this
genus.
Three species are included in Poecilochthonius: P.
italicus (Berlese, 1910a); P. parallelus (Womersley,
1945) n. comb.; P. spiciger (Berlese, 1910a).
Of the 2 specimens of P. parallelus from South
Australia referred to by Womersley (1945), only the
holotype (N1979297) has been found. Even after
remounting, it remains strongly squashed around an
axis that cuts through the region of setal file S on |
side and Za and Zg on the other side. Despite this,
3 characters were observed on | side: subnotal shield
SNS4 is absent: shield bearing seta Jal is broadly
triangulate; adanal setae Zal and Za2 are similar to
each other and conspicuously stouter than Za3. Attri-
butes of the hysteronotal sculpturing which gave rise
to the name parallelus (i.e. the straight median and
lateral ridges almost devoid of sculpturing in between)
distinguish this species from its congeners.
LIOCHTHONIUS-complex
Diagnosis: Brachychthoniidae. Anterior subnotal
shield (SNS1), bearing seta S1, merged with hyster-
onotal shield. Hysteronotal setae Z1, $2, Z2 and Z3
not in nearly straight line parallel to lateral margin
of notal shield because seta Z2 displaced towards
mid-notal line. Subnotal shield SNVS3 separate, merged
with hysteronotal shield or absent. Adoral seta ao2
either parallel sided with blunt distal end, setose or
lanceolate. Two or 3 setae on either genu III or IV
(ventral seta present or absent). Coxite IV bearing 4
setae,
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF SOUTIL AUSTRALIAN SOILS 441
Remarks; Exeept for Syachthonius, members of
the Liechthonius-complex are hardly sculptured at
all on their dorsal integument. Svachthonius does
have seta 42 displaced towards mid-notal line as on
the unsculptured genera, but seta J6 is displaced
anteriorad as for the sculptured genera of the Bra-
chychthonius-complex. Verachihonius also has an
anteriorad displacement of seta /6, although species
have an almost smooth dorsal integument, Yet, there
is a lateral ridge posteriorly around setae 75 and 95,
and sometimes a fainter 1 reaching J6. Possibly this
ridge indicates that ancestors of this genus were more
sculptured with the anteriorad displaced seta J6 on
a tubercle,
Four genera are included in the Liochthonius-com-
plex: Liachthonius van der Hammen, 1959; Mixo-
chthonius Niedbala, 1972a, Syrehthonius yan der
Mammen. 1952: Verachthonius Moritz, 1976a. Only
Lochthonius and Ferachthonjuy have been collected
in South Australia and are considered below.
LIOCHTHONIUS van der Wammen
Brachychthonius Berlese: Strenzke, 195}; 235. Type
indication; none, but & of 12 included species
grouped in Liovhrhanius by Moritz (1976a), other
4 species not in Brachyehrhonius, Assume original
designation of “8, brevis Mich.”, although mis-
identification (Berlese. 1910a) of Brachyehthon-
ius berlesei Willmann, 1928 (Type of
Brachvehthonius Berlese, 19100).
Livehthonius yan der Hammen, 1959; 19. Type des-
ignation (original); “Brachychthonius perpusillis
(redescription by Forsslund, 1942, p. 4, fig. 4).
Livchthonius van der Hammen: Moritz, 1976u; 38.
Type indication: “H\poehthonius brevis Michael,
1888 non Berlese 1910" (syn. Bravhychthanius
perpusillus Berlese, 1910a),
Type-species: Liovhthonius brevis (Michael, [888:
539).
Diagnosis; Liochthanjus-complex, No subnotal
shields separate from hysteronotal shields. Hysteron-
otal setae never conspicuously ciliate, Posterior setae
in hysteronatal file / not conspicuously compacted
forward, seta /6 nearer level of seta Z6 than point
midway between 25 and 26 in relation to posterior
murgin af hysteronotal shield, Notal shields relatively
smooth with few seattered circular markings. Only
udoral seta (av2) setose, tapering to distal point.
Adanal seta Za2 conspicuously longer and stouter
than other 2 setae (Za), 2a3), Three setae on both
genu II] and IV (ventral seta present), Aggenital file
Ja with 4 setae (/24 present).
Distributions Widespread, probably cosmopolitan.
-Reniarks: Liochthonius separates out correctly in
the key of Balogh (1972). Species of all genera without
a sculptured notum and with a centralward displaced
seta Z2 have until recently (1972 and alter) been
grouped in Livch/honius despite the fact that, amongst
a vumber of differences fram the Lype of thal genus.
they have at least | separate subnotal shield: either
SNS\ (Neoliochthonius) or SNS3 (Mixochthanius,
Verachthonius) or both (Neobrachpehrhonits). This
illustrates the fact thal many brachychthoniids have
until recently been classified on the basis of only a
dorsal view of their soma. On the other hand, because
of the strongly sculptured notal shields, the type of
Spnehthonius was previous grouped in Brachychech-
thonius, despite a centralward displaced seta 22.
Niedbala (1972b) included 40 species in Livch-
thonius, but it is difficult to establish for certain haw
inany nominal species should now be included in this
genus, Moritz (19762) includes 22 species from Europe
and Chinone (1978) includes some olf these plus a
further & species from Japan. So that, with a minimum
of 30 nominal species al the moment, if ts likely that
this is the largest genus in the Brachyehthoniidae.
Niedbala (1977) used 37 morphological charucters
to calculate valucs of similarity amongst 19 species
of Liechthonius. Whilst these species clustered into
4 separate groups, Niedbala concluded that establish-
ing subgeneric taxa would be excessive splitting of
the penus.
Moritz (1976a) divided Livehthoniis into 4 specics-
complexes, which do nol correspond to the groups
noted by Nicdbala (1977) and are mainly delineated
by attributes of the notal setac, | have found it useful
to use these species-complexes and a derivation from
Moritz’s key is presented below.
Key to species-compleaes of Liochihoniuy
|. Hysteronotal setae broad, similar breadth ta plasmic proteronpti|
yet 22 (Jl = % 0.75-% 125 23) forridus-coniplex
Hysteronotal setac setose, conspicuously slimmer than dilated
distul half of plasmie proteronotal seta 22 iJ] =leys than x
OTS 22) a
2, Plasmte proteronutal seta c2 distally spindle-shaped. with single
terminal point and bearing 3 to 5 lateral files of 4 to 8 cilia
hrevi-conyples
Plasmic proteronotal setn 22 distally bearing 2 lamellac, each
Will separate leciinal puiqk wad 16 to 20 small maryyoul eis
1
3, Notal setae mostly (always 2) and J3) setose, rounded in crans-
verse section penduncularis-complex
Notal setae mostly (always ot and J3) laieeolate, with niprow
lateral lamellae, V-shaped iq trinsverse section
lappanicuscompley
Members of the /apponicus-complex have not been
collected in South Australia, Species of the brevis-
complex and horridus-complex have been collected
in the present study and are considered below, |
species under each species-complex heading. A single
species in the penduncularis-complex was collected
previously from South Australia and is considered in
the remarks on that species-complex,
342 REC. 8. AUST, MUS., 18 (15): 327-359
brevis-complex
Liochthonius simplex (Forsslund)
(Fig. none)
Brachychthonius simplex Forsslund, 1942: 7.
Brachychthonius cf. perpusillus Berl.: Womersley,
1945: 219.
Liochthonius simplex (Forsslund): Moritz, 1976a: 50.
Female
Shields straw-coloured. Idiosomal length 162.5 (25
ex Knott Hill, 155-170); appendage lengths (for
162.5)—ch 14, pa 35, 185, 1155, I] 50, IV 75; femur
breadths—pa 8, / 13, 17 11, W711, IV 13. Specimens
from Mt. Lofty similar in size, but 5 specimens from
Normanville (Womersley 1945) sometimes larger
(idiosomal length 152.5-205, previously recorded as
235, Womersley 1945), probably because squashed.
No specimens contain eggs. Proteronotal plasmic setae
z2 bears 5 lateral files of 4 to 6 cilia.
Material examined: Twenty-five females
(N1979272-N1979296), litter, under Pinus pinea,
Knott Hill, 22.5.1974; D. C. Lee. Five females
(N1979298-N 1979302) litter and sparse moss, under
Eucalyptus obliqua, Mt. Lofty, 9.5.1974, D. C. Lee.
Five females (N1979303-N1979307) form Norman-
ville (Womersley 1945).
Distribution: Greenland (Nn); Czechoslovakia,
England, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Sweden
(Pe); Bulgaria (Pm); Asiatic USSR (Ps); Japan (Pc);
South Australia (Aa). South Australia: Mt. Lofty,
sclerophyll open-forest, 61 (6/8); Knott Hill, cultivated
pine forest, 113 (2/2); Normanville (Womersley 1945).
Remarks: Moritz (1976a: 41) comments on L. cf.
perpusillus (Berlese: Womersley, 1945) under Lioch-
thonius brevis (Michael, 1888) stating that it is larger
than the latter and with distinctly shorter dorsal setae.
While I agree that this material should be grouped
in the brevis-complex, Womersley’s (1945) measure-
ments for it are misleading and it fits better under
L. simplex than L. brevis according to Moritz’s
(1976a) own descriptions. It should be noted that the
proteronotal plasmic seta has to be examined carefully,
since at certain angles it can appear to have the
attributes of the /apponicus-complex, in which case
this species might be grouped under L mollis (Ham-
mer, 1958). Regarding the description of L. simplex
by Chinone (1974), this appears to fit the description
of L. leptaleus Moritz, 1976a rather than that of L.
simplex.
horridus-complex
Liochthonius fimbriatissimus (Hammer)
(Fig. none)
Brachychthonius cf horridus Sellnick: Womersley,
1945: 220.
June, 1982
Brachychthonius fimbriatus Hammer, 1958: 14 (not
Jacot, 1936: 248).
Liochthonius fimbriatissimus Hammer, 1962: 15.
Liochthonius fimbriatissimus Hammer: Hammer,
1966: 13.
Female
Shields straw-coloured. Idiosomal length 170 (25
ex Piccaninnie Ponds, 162.5-185); appendage lengths
(for 177.5)—ch 13, pa 35, 1 72.5, 11 60, 1/1 60, IV
75; femur breadths—pa 10, / 17, // 14, 17714, IV 16.
Form of some notal setae difficult to assess. Some
notal setae (/1, z1, /6, 76, S6) lanceolate with smooth-
edged hyaline flaps. Other setae (e.g. /2-J5) appear
similar, but hyaline flap sometimes wrinkled so that
edge looks serrate. In contrast, seta S1 has hyaline
flap of | side broken up into file of 6 distinct cilia.
Other setae lanceolate in outline, but uncertain if
edge ciliate or wrinkled. Positors present in all spec-
imens examined and assumed females although no
eggs seen. Of 25 specimens ex Piccaninnie Ponds, 16
contain | or 2 boli made up of material including
distinct cellular forms.
Material examined: Twenty-five females
(N1979218-N1979242), litter and sparse grass, under
Acacia sophorae, coastal scrubland, Piccaninnie
Ponds, 3.7.1974, D. C. Lee. Five females (N1979243-
N1979247), litter and sparse moss, under Eucalyptus
incrassata, Ferries-McDonald, 20.6.1974, D. C. Lee.
Five females (N1979248-N1979252), litter, under
Banksia ornata, Tamboore, 4.7.1974 D. C. Lee. Five
females (N1979253-N1979257) litter and sparse moss,
under Eucalyptus obliqua, Mt. Lofty, 9.5.1974, D.
C. Lee. Five females (N1979258-N1979262), litter,
under Pinus pinea, Knott Hill, 22.5.1974, D. C. Lee.
Seven females (N1979263-N1979271) from Norman-
ville (Womersley 1945).
Distribution: Argentina (NTa), Tierra del Fuego
(Sm), New Zealand (An), South Australia (Aa). South
Australia: Ferries-McDonald, mallee-broombush open-
scrubland, 6 (3/8); Tamboore, mallee-heath tall open-”
shrubland, 68 (6/8); Piccaninnie Ponds, coastal closed-
scrubland, 658 (8/8); Mt. Lofty, sclerophyll open-
forest, 45 (4/8); Knott Hill, cultivated pine forest, 216
(2/2); Normanville (Womersley 1945).
Remarks: The leg I of L. fimbriatissimus is shorter
and stouter than that of L. simplex described above.
The top end of the range of idiosomal lengths given
for L. fimbriatissimus (ex Piccaninnie Ponds) is prob-
ably too high since the specimens all belonged to a
group which had been in lactic acid for a long time
and were distended with extended chelicerae.
Moritz (1976a: 99) pointed out that L. cf horridus
(Sellnick: Womersley, 1945) has shorter and stouter
setae than L. horridus (Sellnick, 1928) and he
excluded if from L. horridus. This material has been
newly identified here as L. fimbriatissimus and the
SARCOPTIPORMES (ACARL QF SOUTH ALSTRALIAN SOILS 545
many specimens from the present study have been
similarly identified. They all look yery much more
like the illustration of this species (Hammer 1958:
fig. 2) from Argentina rather than Womersley’s ilus-
tration (Womersley 1945; fig, [D-G), [lammer (1958)
does figure the notal setae as almost parallel-sided
compared lo the more convex edges of those of the
South Australian specimens, but this may result from
the lateral hyaline Plaps being angled up at their
edges,
pedunculuris-complex
Remarks: Members of the peduncilaris-complex
were not collected in this study, On the other hand,
Livchthonius longipilus (Womersiey, 1945: 220)
mcotb. from Normanville, South Australia (holotype,
N1979308; paratypes N1979309-N1979314) is
grouped jn this species-complex. The illustration
(Womersley 1945: fig 10) of the proteronotal plasmic
selu 22 18 inaccurate; 1b should be as for this species-
complex, The following 2 more reeently described
species are very similar and | or both may be syn-
onyimous With £. loagipilus.
Livohthonins ovellatus, (Hammer, 1958: 19) (newly
identified as 2. longipilus) from Argentina is not L.
ocellatus (Hammer, 1952: 19) (syn. L. Ayiserieinus by
Moniz, 1976a: 66) from Cunada. The subcircular
markings and other characters on the natal surface
ol L. dongipilus are similar to thoge illustrated for
the Argentinian specimens. Therefore, since the
Argentinian material has no valid name it is pro-
visionally grouped under ft. Jongipilys,
Livehthonius perfusorius Moritz, |976a: 93 from
Germany is very similar lo &. lengini/us although
there are fewer notal markings illustrated.
VERACHTHONIUS Moritz
Ferachthonius Moritz, 1976a: 112. Type designation
(original): “Brachyehrhonius laticeps Sitrenzke,
1951”,
Type-species: Verachthonius laticeps (Strenzke, 1951:
240).
Diugnosis, Liachthonius-complex. Qne subnotal
shield (SNS3)separate from hysteronotal shield. Hys-
tcronotal setae never conspicuously ciliate. Posterior
setae in hysteronotal file / conspicuously compacted
forward seta, /6 nearly level to point midway between
Zi and Z6 in relation to posterjor margin of hyster-
onotal shield. Notal shields relatively smooth with
few ridges or circles, usually | ridge runs [rom anterior
notch between posterior notal and pleural shields back
to region of seta 45. Only adoral seta (ae2) stout,
almost parallel-sided with blunt tip. Adanal setae Zal
and Za2 similar, cither setose like seta Zu3 or con-
spicuously stouter than Za3. Three setac on both genu
Wt and IV (ventral seta present), Aggenital file /g¢
with 4 setae (/g4 present).
Distribution: Canada (Nn), Argentina (NTe), Ger-
many (Pe), Japan (Pc), Australia (Aa),
Remarks: Werachihonius species separale oui Lo
the couplet including Brachyehrthonius and Syn-
chthonius in the key of Balogh (1972), But, because
the descriptions of many speicies are mainly based
on a dorsal view of the sama, any such incorrectly
placed species of Verachthonius would probably be
currently included ip Livehthanius rather than Bra-
chychthonius or Synchihonius.
Ferachthanius montanus (Hammer, 1952; 17) fram
Canada and Argentine (Hammer 1958: 19), was
included in Eabrachychthonius but on criteria used
here it clearly belongs in the Liochthonius-complex
and jn either Liochthonius or Verachthonius. My
most heavily weighted attribute for supporting its
inclusion in Verachthanius is the forward displacement
of seta /6,
Five species are included in Ferachthontus: ¥. con-
eruus Moritz, 1976a; V. diversus Moritz, |976a: ¥-
laticeps (Strenzke, 1951); FV. monianus (tlammer,
1952), ncomb.; b wroritc’ m.sp.
Verachthontus moritzé n.sp.
(Figs. 5-13)
Female
General appearance; Shields straw-coloured, |dio-
somal length 157.5 (20, 145-165); appendage lengths
(for holotype, 152.5)—ch 10, pa 32.5, f 62.5, 1747.5,
7/1-47.5, 7 62.5; femur breadths—pa 9. £ 14, ff 11,
HAO, TVA,
Prosternune Gnathosoma illustrated cither dorsay-
entrally squashed (Fig, 9) or laterally squashed so
chelicerae unnaturally extended (Fig, 6). Single adoral
seta (wo2) nearly parallel-sided for entire length,
slightly spread out at blunt distal ip. External malae
refractile and colourless. Coxites Il] and tV of cach
side clearly separated by mid-sternal fissure, but not
established whether or not trough between coxites |
and Il occupied by striated cuticle.
Proteronatuny: Single refractile recess under cow!
shows through anterior part of proteronotal shield of
cleared specimens. Seta 42 present, extremely minute
and lying mid-way between a pore and si, Plassnic
seta 22 bears 5 files of 7 or 8 cilia on distal swollen
part.
Opisthosternum: Genital and anal shields illustrated
(Fig, 7) have lifted away fram mid-sternal! line, appear
narrower, Adanal shields (bearing setal file Za) not
posteriorly merged together, Transverse ridge on shield
between setae Za2 and Za3, Ovipositors involuted,
chaelolaxy dilficull to observe. Ovipasilor of hulotype
(contains egg) tlustrated (Fig. 10) only 5 pairs of
genital setae observed, possibly more present,
344 REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (15): 327-359 June, 1982
ch2 aoees
FIGS. 5-13—Verachthonius moritzi n.sp., female: 5, notum; 6,
pleura; 7, idiosternum; 8, proteronotal cowl; 9, gnathosternum;
10, left genital shield and involuted ovipositor; 11, left chelicera,
anterior surface; 12, part left palp, anterior surface; 13, legs,
dorsal setae on genua, tibiae and tarsi.
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SOILS
Hysteronotum: Weak tidges on shields appear
stronger as illustrated (Fig. 5) than they should be.
Outlines of pleural and subnotal shields faint. Seta
55 on low tubercle.
Appendages: Chelicerae pale, not refractile, weakly
dentate. Setae: ch (1), pa (0-2-1-3-9), [ (0-3-3-4-17), IT
(0-4-3-3-14), 777 (2-3-3-3-1 1), PV C1-2-3-4-11). Solenidia:
pa (0-0-1), J (2-1-3), 17 (1-1-1), 27 (1-1-0), 2 (1-0-0).
On tarsus [, only | solenidium in normal dorsal
position, other 2 solenidia (soy) and larger sov2) ven-
tral and spiniform. Solenidia on all genua and on
tibia Tl] coupled with setae. other dorsal solenidia
separate, Absence of solenidium on tibia [V not known
on other brachychthoniids,
Somal inclustons: Amongst 20 registered rites, 4
(2 from cach site) contain single egg, rest without
epgs. Eggs about 80 (70-82.5) long, ellipsaid with
uniform smooth surface. Two specimens from Piccan-
innie Ponds contain 1] and 18 small (diameter 20-
25) spherical objects in hysterosoma which showed
no internal structure and became very faint in gum
chloral, Possibility that they were spermatophores or
cysticercoids of anoplocephalid tapeworms considered
and latter, if either, seemed more likely, Six specimens
contained | or 2 boli, mainly granular, included some
rectangular cellular forms,
Male
Unknown
Material examined: Holotype female (N1979315)
and 13 paratype females (N1979316-N1979328), litter
and sparse grass, under Acacia sophorae, coastal
scrubland, Piccaninnie Ponds, 20.8.1975, D. C, Lee.
Six females (N1979329-N ]979334), litter, under
Pinus pinea, Knott Hill, 22.5.1974, D. C. Lee.
Distribution: South Australia (Aa), South Australia:
Piccaninnie Ponds, coastal closed-scrubland, 14 (4/
%); Knott Hill, cultivated pine forest, 7 (1/2).
Remarks; Besides having more notal ridges than
the other 4 nominal species, ¥. morirzi has conspi-
cously' longer notal selae, with seta J] longer than
half the distance between J] and J2.
The centralward displacement of hysteronotal seta
72 is not conspicuous for a member of the Lioch-
thonins-complex, but it is more obvious if viewed at
righi-angles to the integument in the region of that
sela or on squashed specimens.
NEOBRACHYCHTHONITUS -camplex
Diagnosis’ Brachychthoniidac. Anterior subnotal
shield (SNS1), bearing seta S|, separate [rom hys-
teronotal shield. Hysteronotal setae #4], $2, 272 and
Z3 nal in nearly straight line parallel to lateral margin
of notal shield because seta Z2 displaced towards
mid-notal line. Subnotal shield SNS3 separate or
445
merged with hysteronotal shield. Adoral seta ao2
cither blunt or stout with swollen distal end. Chae-
totaxy of genu II and TV unknown, Coxite 1V bearing
3 setae,
Remarks: If the 2 genera included in this genus-
complex had not been established, the species would
probably be included in Liochthonius because of the
position of 22. So far they are only known from
Europe (Pe), Paraliochthonius has w be renamed
because its use for a pseudoscorpion genus has priority.
Two genera are included in the Neobrachychthon-
ius-complex; Neobrachychthonius Moritz, 1976b;
Neoliochthonius name for Paraliocehthanius Muritz.
1976a not Paraliochthonius Beier, 1956,
Family TRICHTHONIIDAE n.fam.
Type-genus: Trichthenius Hammer, 1961.
Diagnosis: Hypochthomioidea. Minute to medium -
sized (155-790), pale mites. Two complete transverse
hysteronotal fissures (72, 783); anterior fissure
(7B2) never conspicuously closer to seta J2 than to
J3, posterior fissure (7B3) about halfway between
sela J1 and J6 or posterior to that level. Antertar
part of pleural shield (PS1) either partially (less than
* O.6 breadth) separated off by vertical fissure or
completely merged with posierior pleural shield (P82),
Hysteronotal setae vary considerably in length, setae
J3 and Z3 more than & 2 length of setae J2 or 72.
Longer setae (J3, J4, Z3, 24) setose with inconspi-
cuous lateral cilia or linguiform with cilia and some-
times fringe of balloon-like structures, at least as long
as distance between setal bases J] and J4. Hyster-
onotal seta $2 not as near to mid-notal line as 71,
Each coxite of legs Il and IV completely separate
ar only separate along mid-sternal line with [11 and
IV merged on cach side. No proteronotal eye or eyes
irl Zone between setae /1] and cl, On tarsus |, seta d]
simple, setose or peg-like Adoral file includes | (a2)
or 2 (@o2, an3) setac.
Remarks; Trichthonius was grouped in the Cos-
mochthoniidae by Balogh (1972), But, in the classi-
fication presented in thus paper, Trichthonius has 1o
be grouped in the Retrofissurae rather than the Pral-
issurae which includes Cosmochthoniidae, If the
remarks on the Retrofissurae are studied, it can be
seen by characters used there for the diagnosis of
superfamiles, that Trichthonius must be included in
the Hypochthonioidea, Within this superfamily, the
Heterochthoniidae is the most suitable to include
Trichthonius, on the other hand, the presence of a
proteronotal eye or eyes in members of the Hetero-
chthoniidae and the forward compression of the Jarge
spine-like hysteronotal setae and their shields, has
rade me reluctantly prefer to establish this new
family, the Trichthoniidae,
346
Three genera are included in Trichthoniidae: Mar-
shallia Gordeeva, 1980; Nipponiella Gordeeva, 1980;
Trichthonius Hammer, 1961. Trichthonius has been
collected in South Australia and is considered below.
Marshallia includes 2 species: M. majestus (Marshall
and Reeves, 1970) from North America; M. golosovae
Gordeeva, 1980 from U.S.S.R. Nipponiella includes
| species: NV. simplex (Aoki, 1966) from Japan,
TRICHTHONIUS Hammer
Trichthonius Hammer, 1961; 15. Type designation
(by monotypy); “Cosmochthonius pulcherrimus
Hammer”.
Type-species: Trichthonius pulcherrimus (Hammer,
1958: 22).
Diagnosis: Trichthoniidae. Most notal setae
(including j2, J1, /2, J3, /4,) enlarged, linguiform,
ciliate without fringe of balloon-like structures, and
able to cover most of notum. Fifth rank of hyster-
onotal setae (J5, Z5, S'5) conspicuously nearer to 6th
rank than to zone midway between 4th and 6th ranks.
Cheliceral seta ch2 conspicuous longer (x 1.2 or
more) than fixed cheliceral digit. Two pairs of adoral
setae (ao2,ao03). External malae bifurcate. Each cox-
ite of legs HI] and IV completely separate. Chaetotaxy
of genua: setae /-6, J/-3, IIJ-2, IV-3; solenidia J-1, [I-
1, HTI-1, IV-0.
Remarks: The single Trichthonius species is super-
ficially very similar to members of the Cosmochthon-
iidae, especially to Phyllozetes, so it is understanda-
ble that it has been grouped in that family. Even the
gnathosoma is considerably modified (a feature of
Cosmochthoniidae), although not in a similar way
and there is no conspicuous chitinous structure sup-
porting enlarged pharyngeal muscles. The similarity
is mainly due to the enlarged, erectile hysteronotal
setae (J3, J4, Z3, Z4) which can lie close to the body
or spread upwards like a peacock’s tail. If the weight-
ing of characters presented here is accepted, the
similar characters must be regarded as resulting from
convergent evolution. In contrast, Trichthonius looks
rather different from the much larger, confamilial
Nipponiella, with its almost simple notal setae and
unmodified gnathosoma.
One species is included in Trichthonius: T. pul-
cherrimus (Hammer, 1958).
Trichthonius pulcherrimus (Hammer)
(Figs. 14-21)
Cosmochthonius pulcherrimus Hammer, 1958: 22.
Trichthonius pulcherrimus (Hammer): Hammer,
1961: 15.
Trichthonius pulcherrimus (Hammer): Hammer,
1962: 16.
REC. S. AUST, MUS., 18
(15); 327-359 June, 1982
Female
Shields ochre, covered by granulate adhesive layer.
Idiosomal length 187.5, (4, 180-190); appendage
lengths (for 185)—ch 13, pa 40, I 67.5, IJ 60, I/I 70,
IV 77.5; tibial breadths—/ 14, 17 13, TT 11, IV 13;
femur breadths—/ 14, V7 13 III 14 IV 16. Tibial
breadths given because trochanter and femur of legs
III and IV disproportionately stout compared with
rest of leg. Most notal setae subsemicircular in cross-
section and possibly hollow with branched struts
radiating from ventral midrib to convex dorsal sur-
face. Only dorsal setal surface ciliate, seta J4 has
dorsal bald patch which seta J3 rests on when col-
lapsed down close to body. Erectile setae (J3, /4, Z3,
and Z4) illustrated (Fig. 14) in intermediate position
between lying close to body and being at right-angles
to it. Many notal setae on tubercles with large spines.
For seta s2, spine on tubercle larger than minute seta.
Tubercles of 4 pairs of erectile setae carry 2 large,
bifurcate spines, apparently articulating with spines
of next erectile seta in same rank. Curiously, outward
pointing spines of Z3 and Z4 fit this description
although no other spines with which to articulate.
Posteriorly, hysteronotal shield has central keel which
setae J4 rest beside when lowered close to notum. On
gnathosoma, adoral setae have rigid curved shaped,
seta ao2 also has hyaline flap, external malae bifur-
cate with 2 slim, tapering branches. Chelicerae unu-
sual. Movable digit appears foreshortened with anter-
olateral groove and large, hooked posterolateral
process. Fixed digit edentate, may be movable. Seta
ci2 large, curved with ventral hyaline flap. chelicerae
has groove along anterolateral surface from the region
of the mouth to base of movable digit. Pharynx
appears simple and without conspicuous muscles sup
ported by chitinous struts. On legs HI and IV, tro-
chanter, and to lesser extent femur, large and wrin-
kled.
Appendage setae: ch (2), pa (0-2-1-3-10), J (1-3-6-
6-19), I (0-4-3-5-17), IIT (2-3-2-4-15), IV (2-3-3-4-13).
Solenidia: pa (0-0-1), 7 (1-1-1), 77 (1-1-2), T/T (1-1-0),
IV (0-1-0). Solenidial form: baculiform on tapa, tal,
u//, tall(sol + so2); ceratiform on ge//, gellI llI,
n/V; flagelliform with coupled seta on ge/, til.
No somal inclusions (food boli or eggs) observed.
Material examined: One female (N1979335), litter
or grass and moss, under Eucalyptus viminalis,
Chambers Gully, 12.6.1974, D. C. Lee. Three females
(N1979336-N1979338), litter and sparse moss, under
Eucalyptus obliqua, sclerophyll forest, Mt. Lofty,
9.5.1974, D. C. Lee.
Distribution: Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Peru (NTc);
South Australia (Aa). South Australia: Chambers
Gully, savannah woodland, 1(1/8); Mt. Lofty, scler-
ophyll open-forest, 3(2/8).
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SOILS 347
15,17, 19, 20,21
FIGS. 14-21—Trichthonius pulcherrimus (Hammer), female: 14,
pleura; 15, right chelicera, anterior surface; 16, idiosternum;
17, gnathosternum; 18, left trochanter and femur IV, anterior
and ventral surfaces; 19, right leg I, dorsal setae on genu,
tibia and tarsus; 20, left palp tarsus, anterior surface; 21, left
genital shield and ovipositor.
348
Remarks: There are differences between the
description of the type material and the South Aus-
tralian specimens, such as larger (230), proteronotal
plasmic setz z2 not strongly dilated distally, hyster-
onotal seta J4 without dorsal bald patch, tibia I
solenidium about half length of genu I solenidium.
For the time being, these are regarded as either
intraspecific variations or reflecting inaccurate illus-
tration.
The gnathosoma is interesting in having primitive
(only present in Bifemoratina and Retrofissurae) dis-
junct external malae and yet being considerably mod-
ified. The adoral setae and external malae appear to
be modified to hold a globule of liquid and the
chelicerae to provide a tube to suck up liquids. Unfor-
tunately, there were no boli in the 4 specimens col-
lected to give an indication of the nature of the food.
The shape of trochanter III and IV has not been
used in the diagnoses of higher taxa. But the simple
cylinder (Fig. 18), possibly given more mobility in T.
pulcherrimus by being wrinkled, could be regarded
as primitive, and within the Arthronotina be diagnostic
of Retrofissurae. In contrast, Cosmochthonius has a
modified trochanter (Fig. 24) which must give much
more mobility to the leg, and could be diagnostic of
Cosmochthonioidea.
Subcohort PROFISSURAE n.
Diagnosis: Arthronotina. Usually 3 transverse hys-
teronotal fissures (7B1, 7B2, TB3), sometimes obscure
as when notal setae umbellate (Pterochthoniidae), or
when notum folded so that second fissure (7B2) cov-
ered by first hysteronotal shield (Sphaerochthoniidae),
sometimes posterior fissures (TB2, 7B3) partial (some
Protoplophoridae), sometimes posterior fissure (7B3)
absent (Sphaerochthoniidae). No hysteronotal gland
with egress pore between setae Z4 and Z5. Cowl
present, enclosing retracted chelicerae. Chelicerae
often modified so that either fixed digit or seta ch2
comb-like; rarely seta chl absent in which case ch2
simple, Palp tarsus without distal bifurcate plasmic
seta and often with 2 ribbon-like dorsal setae con-
spicuously longer than itself, External malae conjunct.
Often conspicuous internal chitinous structure sup-
porting enlarged pharyngeal muscles. One pair (Zaf)
of adanal pores present. On tarsus I, seta dl never
bifurcate. No genua bear solenidia. Pretarsi usually
with either 1 claw, 2 unequal claws (1 stout simple
claw, 1 slim or ciliate claw) or 3 unequal claws
(central stout claw, lateral slim claws), very rarely 2
subequal claws.
Remarks: The Profissurae is a new taxon. It has a
diversity of form that reflects that of the Retrofissurae
(see remarks on parallel evolution under Arthronotina).
The name, Profissurae, is intended to indicate the
main attribute which contrasts with Retrofissurae, i.e.
that the anterior hysteronotal fissure (7B1) is always
present.
REC. 8S. AUST, MUS,, 18 (15): 327-359
June, 1982
The comb-like structure of the fixed cheliceral digit
has been considered primitive in Pterochthonius, sug-
gesting the origin of chelate chelicerae amongst Acari.
This is unlikely. Probably, both it, the comb-like seta
ch2 and other specializations of gnathosoma amongst
Profissurae, function by sifting single-celled organisms
from liquids. What is peculiar about these attributes
is that they occur regularly amongst the Profissurae
(whilst being absent elsewhere amongst Cryptostig-
mata) yet they may be either present or absent in
very similar genera. This might lead to the conclusion
that there were polymorphic forms or stages of the
same species, but there is no support for this concept.
The attributes of pretarsal claws are used in the
diagnosis although they are complex. The model is
that, amongst Profissurae, pretarsi have a stout central
claw, with slim lateral claws | or both of which may
be lost especially on anterior legs, so that there should
not be 2 subequal claws as on some other Arthronotina.
The | known exception is Cosmochthonius bengalensis
with 2 equally thick and curved claws on all pretarsi.
The form of the claws of Krivolutskiella (Cosmo-
chthoniidae) is not known, although they are unusual
for the Profissurae in there being 2 claws on pretarsus
IV.
The Profissurae includes 2 superfamilies: Cosmo-
chthonioidea Grandjean, 1969; Protoplophoroidea
Grandjean, 1965. The Protoplophoroidea includes 1
family as listed by Balogh (1972) and in relation to
this study has been referred to (Lee 1981) under the
now disbanded Arthroptyctima. The Cosmochthon-
ioidea, some of which were also collected in this
study, are considered further below.
Superfamily COSMOCHTHONIOIDEA
Diagnosis: Profissurae. Prehysteronotal fissure
usually not hinged and never acutely hinged.
Remarks: The genera of Cosmochthonioidea as
delineated here are very much as listed by Balogh
(1972), except that the Pterochthoniidae are included.
Grandjean (1954b: 334) drew attention to the remark-
able similarity between members of this superfamily,
particularly Sphaerochthonius, and the Protoplophor-
idae. In fact, whilst the Protoplophoridae was given
quite a substantial diagnosis in my previous paper
(Lee 1981: 212), if it was diagnosed here as a super-
family to be delineated from the Cosmochthonioidea,
I would be confident only of giving its acutely hinged
prehysteronotal fissure as a diagnostic attribute.
Mahunka (1977b) established a new protoplophorid
genus, Hauseroplophora from Kenya, which, because
of its superficial similarity to Sphaerochthonius, he
regarded as further supporting Grandjean’s supposi-
tion. But in fact, although the form of its setae is
similar to Sphaerochthonius, Hauseroplophora is not
as similar as Aedoplophora and Cryptoplophora
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SOILS 349
(2 other genera of Protoplophoridae) are to Sphaer-
ochthonius in the shape and disposition of the somal
shields. Certainly, further study of established taxa
within the Profissurae may indicate a broader basis
for distinguishing the Protoplophoroidea from this
superfamily. For example, Sphaerochthonius appears
to share with Cosmochthonius the proximal construc-
tion of femur and trochanter IV, whilst these segments
on members of the Protoplophoroidea are without
such a constriction. On the other hand, a more thor-
ough examination of Sphaerochthonius may indicate
that it can, or originates from mites that could, fold
up its soma around hinged fissures. This or other
attributes may make the superfamily groups here
redundant. Possibly, the present diverse Protophopho-
roidea represents a convergence from different evo-
lutionary trends within the Cosmochthonioidea, but
at this stage, | am adopting a conservative approach
and maintaining it as in the classification of Balogh
(1972).
The Cosmochthonioidea includes 4 families: Cos-
mochthoniidae Grandjean, 1946; Haplochthoniidae
van der Hammen, 1959; Pterochthoniidae Grandjean,
1950b; Sphaerochthoniidae Grandjean, 1947a. The
Haplochthoniidae and Pterochthoniidae were not rep-
resented in collections for this study and are not
further considered.
Family COSMOCHTHONIIDAE Grandjean
Cosmochthoniidae Grandjean, 1946: 315.
Type-genus: Cosmochthonius Berlese, 1910.
Diagnosis: Cosmochthonioidea. Minute (240-360),
ivory white to brown mites. Three complete, unob-
scured hysteronotal fissures (7B1, TB2, TB3). Four
pairs of hysteronotal setae (J3, J4, 73, Z4) long (at
least as long as distance between setal bases /1 and
J4) and erectile. Cowl broken up by 2 to 4 ranks of
4-9 longitudinal slits. Anterior subpleural shield
(SPS1) has protruding ventral wing-like process, whilst
subpleural shield (SPS2) has ventral extension to
large pore. Genital tracheae present. Anterior cheli-
ceral seta (ch2) pectinate with, 5 or 6 prongs. Tarsus
I bears | solenidium, Tarsi I-IV with 2 or 3 claws.
Remarks: This widespread family, the Cosmo-
chthoniidae, has very similar members grouped in 3
genera: Cosmochthonius Berlese, 1910; Krivolut-
skiella Gordeeva, 1980; Phyllozetes Gordeeva, 1978.
Both Cosmochthonius and Phyllozetes have been col-
lected in South Australia and are considered below.
Krivolutskiella includes 1 species: K. pubescens Gor-
deeva, 1980 from the Canary Islands.
COSMOCHTHONIUS Berlese
Cosmochthonius Berlese, 1910a: 221. Type designation
(original); “C. /anatus (Mich.)”.
Type-species: Cosmochthonius lanatus (Michael,
1885: 396).
Diagnosis: Cosmochthoniidae. Some notal setae
(J3, J4, Z3, Z4) long, stout, ciliate without broad
leaf-like lateral membrane. Pretarsus | with 2 claws,
pretarsi Il, [1] and IV with 2 or 3 claws (2 subequal
claws or stout central claw with | or 2 slim lateral
claws). Coxites II] and IV separate from each other.
More setae on femur II and tarsi ill and IV (6, 16
and 14).
Distribution: Widespread—Canada (Nn), Califor-
nia (Nc), Nevada (Nr); Bolivia, Argentina, Peru
(NTc): Ghana (Ew); England, Germany, France, Rus-
sia (Pe); Italy (Pm); Russia (Ps): East Java (Om);
Australia (Aa), New Zealand (An).
Remarks: Cosmochthonius is an easily recognised
genus, but 2 species originally grouped in it are now
combined in other genera. One, Trichthonius pul-
cherrimus (Hammer), see above, is here regarded as
only superficially similiar, and is now in another sub-
cohort (Retrofissurae). The other, Phy//ozetes emmae
(Berlese), see below, is similiar but was excluded by
a restriction in the extent of the genus. The value of
restricting the genus is questionable since the discovery
of taxa with 2 claws on all legs: Krivolutskiella with
some leaf-like hysteronotal setae (/3, Z3) like those
of Phyllozetes; Cosmochthonius bengalensis with hys-
teronotal setae characteristic of Cosmochthonius.
Most descriptions of Cosmochthonius species are
almost confined to the notal surface: exceptions are
those of C. reticulatus by Grandjean (1962) and C.
fovealatus as originally described. Having given new
status to 3 subspecies, revoked a synonymy and named
a previously described but unnamed species there are
now listed below 15 species of Cosmochthonius. Gor-
deeva (1980) provides a key for 7 palaearctic species,
which still leaves a problem for those wishing to
identify Cosmochthonius from elsewhere. Since, in
the past, notal sculpturing and the ciliation of the 4
large erectile setae (J3, J4, Z3, Z4) are the main
diagnostic characters, | have used a unified termi-
nology (see above under “Notation for Morphology’)
to briefly describe such attributes for all species.
Some characters that differ from C. australicus (as
described below) are also referred to. For convenience,
the species are grouped in 4 species-complexes: reti-
culatus-complex, foveolatus-complex, plumatus-com-
plex, asiaticus-complex.
reticulatus-complex
Diagnosis: Reticulate sculpturing covering posterior
hysteronotal shield (NS4y. Cilia on hysteronotal seta
J3 even, usually short and sparse, rarely longer or
medium spaced, between 14-38 on | side.
350
Remarks: Five species are included in the reticu-
latus-complex. The inclusion of C. lanatus is debat-
able.
Cosmochthonius bengalensis Chakrabarti et al.
Cosmochthonius bengalensis Chakrabarti, Bhaduri
and Raychaudhuri, 1972: 86.
Length, 288-290 (ex West Bengal—Oi). Seta zl
unbranched. Seta s2 long, ciliate as jl. Seta J2 not
on anterior ridge of second hysteronotal shield (NS2).
Seta /3 with about 36 short sparse cilia on each side.
Coxites I, I], II, IV with 3, 1, 3, 3 setae. Pretarsi I,
Il, IL, IV with 2, 2, 2, 2 equally thick claws.
Cosmochthonius lanatus (Michael)
Hypochthonius lanatus Michael, 1885: 396.
Hypochthonius lanatus Michael, 1888: 541.
Cosmochthonius lanatus: Willmann, 1931: 101.
Length, 330 (ex England—Pe), 290-320 (ex Ger-
many—Pe). Seta z1 unbranched. Seta J3 with more
than 25 medium lengthed and medium spaced cilia
on each side.
Remarks: Michael (1888) illustrates C. /anatus
with large abutting puncta on the notum, but in the
text states “notogaster is strongly and coarsely reti-
culated”, also Willmann’s (1931) illustration shows
dorsal pits with distinctly straight edges. On the other
hand, in Gordeeva’s (1980) key (couplet 9/10), for
“Cosmochthonius sp. (lanatus?)”’ the notal surface is
described as having rounded abutting pits, and van
der Hammen (1952) regards C. domesticus as syn-
onymous with C. /anatus. Therefore the position of
this poorly described species is uncertain.
Cosmochthonius reticulatus Grandjean
Cosmochthonius reticulatus Grandjean, 1947b: 354.
Cosmochthonius reticulatus Grandjean, 1962: 404.
Length, 300-340 (ex France—Pe). Cheliceral fixed
digit with 5 well developed teeth, seta ch2 with 6
prongs. Transverse ridge between setal pair jl. Seta
s2 long, ciliate (compared with C. australicus)
although shorter and slimmer than other proteronotal
setae. Plasmic seta 22 with distal half much stouter
(< 6) than proximal half. Seta J2 not on anterior
ridge of second hysteronotal shield (NS2). Seta J3
with 14 long sparse cilia on each side. Appendage
setae and solenidia similar to C. australicus except
tibia II] with 5 and tarsus IIT with 15 setae.
Cosmochthonius sublanatus Mahunka
Cosmochthonius sublanatus Mahunka, 1977a: 254.
Length, 273-294 (ex eastern Java—Om). Seta zl
unbranched. Seta s2 long, ciliate as j2. Seta j3 with
about 30 short medium spaced cilia on each side.
REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (15): 327-359
June, 1982
Seta z3 with sparse cilia, /4 and Z4 shorter (x 0.5)
than 3rd setal rank.
Cosmochthonius wallworki n.sp.
Cosmochthonius spec. (C. lanatus?) Wallwork, 1960:
386.
Length, 291 (ex Ghana—Ew). Seta s2 long, ciliate
(compared with C. australicus) although shorter than
other proteronotal setae. Plasmic seta z2 with distal
half slightly stouter (* 1.5) than proximal half. Seta
J2 on anterior ridge of second hysteronotal shield
(NS2). Seta J3 with 18 short sparse cilia on each
side.
foveolatus-complex
Diagnosis; Punctate sculpturing covering posterior
hysteronotal shield (N.S4). Cilia on hysteronotal seta
J3 even, long and either sparse or dense, between 5-
60 on | side.
Remarks: Six species are included in the foveola-
tus-complex. Three species (C. domesticus, C. fov-
eolatus, semiareolatus) are similar to each other in
having denser cilia and closer spaced puncta, and
have been referred to as similar to C. lanatus (reti-
culatus-complex).
Cosmochthonius domesticus Grandjean
Cosmochthonius domesticus Grandjean, 1947b: 354.
Length, 245-285 (ex France—Pe). Cheliceral fixed
digit with 4 teeth, central 2 inconspicuous, seta ch2
with 6 prongs. Form of cilia on hysteronotal seta J3
unknown. Puncta on posterior hysteronotal shield
(NS4) large, circular or oval, never polygonal, and
abutting.
Remarks: The synonomy of C. domesticus with C.
lanatus (van der Hammen, 1952: 22) is revoked on
the basis that it is not yet satisfactorily established.
Cosmochthonius foveolatus Beck n. status
Cosmochthonius lanatus foveolatus Beck, 1962: 232.
Length, 320-360 (ex Peru—NTc). Cheliceral fixed
digit with 4 conspicuous teeth, seta ch2 with 5 prongs.
Seta zl unbranched. Ridge and tubercles connecting
posterior margin of bothridia of plasmic setae 22.
Seta J2 not on anterior ridge of second hysteronotal
shield (NS2). Seta J3 with about 35 long, dense cilia
on each side. Puncta on posterior hysteronotal shield
(NS4) large, circular and abutting.
Cosmochthonius ponticus Gordeeva
Cosmochthonius ponticus Gordeeva, 1980: 844.
Length, 245 (ex Crimea—Pe). Seta s2 long, ciliate
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SOILS 35]
(compared with C. australicus) although shorter than
other proteronotal setae. Seta J3 with 5 or 6 medium
lengthed cilia on each side near base. Puncta on
posterior hysteronotal shield (V.S4) large, irregular in
outline and well separated.
Cosmochthonius semiareolatus Hammer
Cosmochthonius semiareolatus Hammer, 1966: 14.
Length, 285 (New Zealand—An). Seta s2 long,
ciliate as j2. Seta J3 with about 60 long (longest in
genus), dense cilia on each side. Puncta on posterior
hysteronotal shield (NS4) large, circular and abut-
ting.
Cosmochthonius tenuisetus Gordeeva
Cosmochthonius tenuisetus Gordeeva, 1980: 844.
Length, 245 (ex Crimea—Pe). Seta s2 long, ciliate
(compared with C. australicus) although shorter than
other proteronotal setae. Seta J2 long (reaches back
to setal base J4). Seta J3 with 6 or 7 long, sparse
cilia on each side, evenly spaced along seta. Puncta
on posterior hysteronotal shield (N.S4) small, circular
and well separated.
Cosmochthonius ugamaensis Gordeeva
Cosmochthonius ugamaensis Gordeeva, 1980: 846.
Length, 290 (ex Uzbekistan—Ps). Seta /1 bifurcate,
Y-shaped. Seta s2 long, ciliate as j2. Seta J2 not on
anterior ridge of second hysteronotal shield (NS2).
Seta J3 with 6 long, sparse cilia on each side, evenly
spaced along seta. Puncta on posterior hysteronotal
shield (NS4) large, star-shaped in outline and close
although not abutting.
plumatus-complex
Diagnosis: Punctate sculpturing covering posterior
hysteronotal shield (NS4). Cilia on hysteronotal seta
J3 uneven with both sparse long cilia and dense short
(3 or 4 to each long cilium) cilia.
Remarks: Two species are included in the p/umatus-
complex, | of which is C. australicus collected in
this study.
Cosmochthonius australicus Womersley n.stat.
(Figs. 22-29)
Cosmochthonius plumatus australicus Womersley,
1945; 222.
Female
Dull, ochre to orange. Cuticle covered in granulate
hyaline adhesive layer which easily peels off. Refrac-
tile parts (external malae, cheliceral extremities, setae
and claws) paler than general integument. Idiosomal
length 280 (20 ex Ferries-McDonald, 275-285: others
within this range); appendage lengths (for 280)—ch
15, pa 60, f 120, 17 95, TT 100, 1V 115; femur
breadths—pa 14, J 24, I7 22.5, 1/7 20, IV 20.
Puncta on posterior hysteronotal shield (NS4) large,
circular and close although not abutting. On next
shield (NS3), few very faint puncta not represented
in illustration (Fig. 22). Few distinct puncta on second
shield (NS2). On anterior shield (NMS1), few rectan-
gular pits. Setae J3, Z3, with about 24 long cilia and
about 100 short cilia on each side. Setae J4, 24
shorter with longer sparser long cilia. Proteronotal
seta z] bifurcate and T-shaped, with shorter posterior
branch.
Cowl sometimes has 3 ranks of slits, posterior rank
with 9 slits, middle rank with 7 slits, anterior rank
with 5 slits, but arrangement may be more haphazard.
Bases of conjunct external malae with central tri-
angular flaps covering bases of internal malae and,
with external malae, encompass oval aperture through
which preoral setae protrude. Mentum undelineated,
transverse ridge not regarded as mentocoxal fissure.
Three wing-like processes on pleural and subpleural
shields, lying above coxae III and IV. Posterior sub-
pleural shield (SPS2) with ventral extension that
becomes groove, lined with processes or hairs, leading
to conspicuous pore behind coxa IV,
Chelicerae pale, fixed digit with 4 well developed
refractile teeth. Trochanter IV and femur TV, to lesser
extent same segments on leg III, unusual for primitive
oribatids (possibly true for all Cosmochthonioidea) in
being constricted proximally. These segments look as
if they may be able to rotate around their proximal
articulation, rather than rock backwards and forwards.
Appendage setae: ch (2), pa (0-2-1-3-11), I (0-5-5-
6-19), IT (1-6-5-6-17), III (2-3-4-4-14). Solenidia: pa
(0-0-1), 7 (0-0-1), 7 (0-1-1), H/T (0-1-0), JV (0-1-0).
Claws: I-2; I], II], 1V-3. Cheliceral seta ch 2 with 6
prongs. Some setae on palp tarsus long and at least
seta d4 ribbon-like and possibly plasmic. On tarsus I,
plasmic seta d1 dilates slightly distally, curling around
seta pd3. On tibia I, solenidium and coupled seta on
conspicuous tubercle. Solenidia on posterior 3 pairs
of legs ceratiform, those on tibiae (especially tibia
IV) small. Positor short, but too large to be male,
although all genital setae appear similar in size.
Conspicuous internal chitinous structures encompass
pharynx between level of preoral and postoral setae,
also ovoid refractile membrane (not illustrated) arises
in region of palp coxite and extends backwards to
coxite Il, probably equivalent of “vpx’’ (Grandjean
1948: fig. 3A). Genital tracheae extend forward from
anterior end of genital orifice. Gut contents consist
entirely of dark green granular material and refractile
spheres (diameter, 2-3). Narrow pharynx expands
about level of seta J2 into fat horseshoe-shaped pair
of dorsal diverticulae that loop backwards around
352 REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (15): 327-359 June, 1982
AONv00S
GLE PAA
50m
23,24,26,27 28,29
30
22,25
FIGS. 22-30—Cosmochthonioidea: 22-29, Cosmochthonius aus-
tralicus Womersley, female; 22, pleura; 23, right chelicera,
anterior surface; 24, left trochanter and femur IV, anterior
and ventral surfaces; 25, idiosternum; 26, left palp tarsus,
anterior surface; 27, gnathosternum; 28, right leg I; 29, left
genital shield and ovipositor; 30, Sphaerochthonius splendidus
(Berlese), notum.
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SOTLS
lateral margins of hysteronotum, Dorsal diverticulac
often uniformly full of food. At anterior end of horse-
shoe-shape (between level of setae J2 and J3) gut
inclines ventralwards to anus. This strip of straight
gut usually contains. 2 or 3 boli, anterior bolus being
diffuse and larger whilst posterior bolus smaller
(diameler, about 25) and dense. No eggs observed
inside mites.
Material examined: Lectotype (NJ979378) and 2
paralectotypes (N1979379-N1979380), moss, Mt.
Arden, southern Flinders Ranges, 11,1943, H.M,
Cooper. Twenty females (N1979339-N1979358), lit-
ter and sparse moss, under Eucalyptus incrassata,
mallee scrubland, Ferries-McDonald, 20.6.1974, D.C.
Lee. Six females (N1I979359-N 1979364), grass and
moss or Jitter under Eucalyptus virrinalis, savannah
woodland, Chambers Gully, 12.6.1974, D.C. Lee,
Twelve females (N1979365-N1979376), litter and
sparse moss, under Eucalyptus obliqua, sclerophyll
forest, Mt. Lofty, 9.5.1974, D.C. Lee. One female
(posterior half) (N1979377), grass and plantain, Glen-
thorne, 12,6,1974, D.C, Lee,
Distribution: South Australia (Aa). South Aus-
\ralia; Ferries-McDonald, mallee-broombush open-
scrubland, 20(3/8); Chambers Gully, savannah wood-
land, 6(3/8); Mt. Lofty, sclerophyll open-forest,
12(4/8); Glenthorne, cultivated pasture, 1(1/8); Mt.
Arden and Waterfall Gully (Womersley, 1945).
Remarks: Regarding the collection data, the record
of | specimen from Glenthorne is based on a hyster-
osoma alone, but from its condition it is assumed that
the mite was damaged after collection. The original
6 specimens from Waterfall Gully cannot be found,
Instead of the 2 specimens, as originally recorded
from Mt. Arden, there are 3 specimens with exactly
the same labels. The specimen designated as the
lectotype is the specimen drawn (Womersley, 1945;
fig. 2) on the basis of the position of hysteronotal
setae. One specimen designated as a paralectotype
cannot belong ta the published syntype series, but,
since it is not known which one, this has to be dis-
regarded,
The original description (Womersley, 1945) is
inaccurate for a number of attributes, for example
the form of the cilia on hysteronotal setae J3, J4, Z3,
#4 and the presence of punctuations on the third
hysteronotal segment (VS3). Since these inaccuracies
apply to the main 2 groups of characters used in
diagnosis, it highlights the need for this genus to be
reviewed by someone with type specimens before him
rather than only descriptions in the literature.
Cosmochthonius australicus can be distinguished
from C. plumatus, the only other member of the
species-complex, by the form of the hysteronotal
puncta. On the other hand, these puncta are similar
A53
to those of some members of the foveolatus-complex
which also have seta J3 with even, dense, long cilia.
The gnathosoma of this species, as that of a number
of other members of the Profissurae, is unusual, as
initially described by Grandjean (1948 and 1954b),
The ribbon-like palp setae and the comb-like cheli-
cera] seta suggest that the food is swept out of a
liquid, possibly with the slits in the cowl also acting
as a sieve. Whilst the structures at the anterior end
of the pharynx may be a crushing or suctorial mech-
anism. On the other hand, although in South Aus-
tralia C. australicus is recorded from moister regions,
mallee scrubland is not an environment in which free
water is often present.
Cosmochthonius plumatus Berlese
Cosmoachthonius plumatus Berlese, 1910: 221.
Casmochthonius plumatus: Grandjean, 1950a: 78.
Length, 300 (ex Italy—Pm), Cheliceral fixed digit
with 4 well developed teeth, seta ch2 with 6 prongs,
Seta s2 with long cilia. Seta J3 form only partially
known, but cilia uneven with sparse Jong cilia and
dense short cilia. Puncta on posterior hysteronotal
shield (NS4) small, varying in size and well separated,
asiaticus-complex
Diagnosis: No sculpturing covering posterior hys-
teronotal shield (VS4). Cilia on hysteronotal seta J7
even, long and sparse, between 8-22 on 1 side,
Remarks: Two species are included in the asiaticus-
complex. One species (C. suramericanus), because it
apparently has only | claw on each of its pretarsi,
may be based on a nymph
Cosmochthonias asiaticus Gordeeva
Cosmochthonius asiaticns Gordeeva, )980: 846.
Length, 319 (ex Tadzhikstan—Ps)}, Seta s2 long,
ciliate as 72. Seta J2 long (reaches back almost Lo
setal base /4). Seta J3 with 8 long, sparse cilia on
each side, evenly spaced along seta.
Cosmochthonius suramericanas. Harmer n.stat,
Coxsmochthonius pluntatus suramericanus Hammer,
[958: 23.
Length, 220 (ex Argentina—NTe).. Seta 92 long,
ciliate as j2. Seta J3 with about 25 long, sparse cilia
on each side.
PHYLLOZETES Gordeeva
Phyllozetes Gordgeva, 1978; 1099, Type designation
(original): “Cosmochthonius entmae Berl., 1910"
Type-species; Phyllozeres emmae (Berlese, 1910: 222)
4 REC, S, AUST, MUS,, 14 (1S): 327-759
Diagnosis: Cosmochthoniidac. Some notal setae (/3,
J4, Z3, Z4) long, stout, leal-like with broud lateral
membrune bearing marginal cilia, Pretarsi 1, I} and
HI with 2 claws (stout central claw, slim anterior
claw), pretarsus TV with 3 claws. Coxites I] and IV
merged together. Fewer selae. on femur IL and tarsi
HW} and IV (5, 13 and 12).
Distribution: Widespread—Texas (Nr); France, east
Crimea (Pe); Algeria, Austria, Greece, Hungary, Italy
(Pm); Japan (Pe); India (Ol); Kormodo Islands (Am):
South Australia (Aa).
Some |iteraiure suggests that species are found in
humus imongst trees or in moist ground even if poor
in organic material. But PAvilozetes is also recorded
from rapid draining sandy soil with depleted vegeta-
won. In South Australia it was collected in a fairly
dry sandy area, as well as from moister sites, | having
a substantial humus layer.
Remarks. Phyllozetes is certainly closely allied to
Cosinochthonius and Krivelutskiella. Wt may in the
future prove preferable to group these genera together.
The name “Ovechthonius’ is used in cambination
with P. evmiae by Mahunka (1980: 110) with the
authority of Gordeeva 1978: 1099. This is presumed
to result from confused communication, since Ovo-
chthonius Ryabinin in Ryabinin and Krivolutzky, 1977
is grouped in the Heterochthoniidae.
Five species are included in Phyplluzeres: P. emmiae
(Berlese, 1910); P; Aypoquercus McDaniel and Bolen,
)980), P. latifolius Gordeeva, 1980; P. osithchnjukovi
Gordeeva, 1980; PF. tauricus Gordeeva, 1978.
The specimens collected in this study are grouped
in FP, emmiae, Because it is difficult to delineate this
species, the other 4 species ure briefly described. P.
Aypoquercus: length, 285 (ex Texas—Nr); seta jl Y-
shaped; setae J2-/2. close (*% 0.5 J2-72); setae J3,
£3 similur to /4, 24, with short, dense marginal cilia
(over 50 on | Side), comes I, 11, HL, VY with 3,3,
3, 3 setae. P. latifolius: length, 150 (ex Canary
Islands— Pm, Crimea-—Pe); seta /1 unbranched; setae
J2-J2 close (& OF J2-272); setae J3, Z3 narrower,
with short, medium spaced marginal cilia (about 32
on | side); setue J4. 274 broader, with long, medium
spaced marginal cilia (about 32 on | side); number
uf setae on coxiles unknown. #. osi/hchnjukavi. length,
160 (ex Russia—Pe); seta jl unbranched, setac J2-
J/2 with bases touching (less than x 0.) /2-772); setae
J3, 23 narrower, with short, dense marginal cilia
(about 55 on 1 side); setae /4, 24 broader, with
medium lengthed and long. medium spaced marginal
cilia (about 35 on | side); number of setae on coxiles
unknown. P. fauricus: length, 285 (ex Crimea—Pe);
seta 7] Y-shaped, seta J2-J2 widely spaced (x 0.8
or more J2-22); setae J3, 73 narrower, with long
sparse marginal cilia (about 'S on | side); 4, 24
June, 1Y82
broader, with long, sparse marginal cilia (about 17
on | side), coxites 1, TH, ILL, FV with 3, 3, 3, 3 setae.
Phyllozetes emmae (Berlcse)
(Fig. none)
Cosmochthanius emmae Berlese, 1910: 222.
Cosmochthonius enmae Berlese; Mahunka, 1977:
254,
Ovochthonius emntae (Berlese): Mahunka, 1980; 110,
Phyllozetes emmae (Berlese): Gordeeva, 1980: 849,
Female
lyory-white to pale straw-coloured, Cuticle covered
by dirty, hyaline, adhesive exudate. Idiosomal Jength
200 (4, 187.5-210); appendage lengths (for 187.5 ex
Piccaninnie Ponds)—ch 11, pa 40, 1 72.5, 17 57.5, LU
60, #F 72.5; femur breadths—pa 10, J 19, 77 18, IT
15, /F AS.
Hysteronotal shields appear to lack seulpturing,
Proteronotal seta jl bifurcate (Y-shaped), seta z]
bifurcate (T-shaped) with posterior branch about
X0.5 length of anterior branch. Hysteronotal setal
pair J2 almost (X0.8 or more) as far apart as distance
between sctal bases. J2-22, Anterior erectile setae
(J3, 23) with lateral lamellae gradually tapering, and
long, dense to medium spaced cilia along margin
(about 30 on | side), Posterior erectile setae (/4, 24)
with broader gradually tapering lateral lamellae, and
long, dense to medium spaced cilia along margin (32-
35 on | side). Shape of most other somal setae similar
to that of P. tauricus, Coxites 1, 1, LI, TY with 3,
2, 3, 4 setae, Central margin of genital shield with 6
Jg setae. Chaetotaxy and solenidiotaxy of appendages
similar to C. australicus, except femur 11 has only 5
setae (sela a absent), tarsus Il] has only 13 setae
(setae p2, py2, v3 absent), tarsus 1V has only |2 setae
(selae pv2, v3 absent). Claws: I, I], I[1-2; P'V-3.
Gnathosoma, internal structures around pharyns,
genital tracheae, structure of alimentary canal and
contained food, ovipositor, all similar to those of C.
australicus.
Material examined: Two females (N1979383 and
N1979384), litter and sparse moss, under Eucalyptus
incrassata, mallee scrubland, Ferries-McDonald,
20.6.1974, D. C. Lee. One female (N1979382), litter,
under Banksia ornata, mallee-heath shrubland,
Tamboore, 4,7.1974, BD. C. Lee. One female
(N1979381), litter and sparse prass, under Acacia
sophorae, coastal scrubland, Piceaninnie Ponds,
20.8.1975, DC. Lee.
Pistrihution: Uncertain because of difficulty of
identification. Possibly Palaearctic and Australian
regions. South Australia; Ferries-McDonald, mallee-
broombush open-scrubland, 2 (1/8); Tamboore, mal-
lee-heath tall open-shrubland, | (1/8); Piccaninnie
Ponds, coastal closed-scrubland, | (1/8).
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SOILS
Remarks: Specimens regarded as P. emmae are
described from 3 localities other than the type mate-
rial and that from South Australia, These descriptions
are almost limited to 2 erectile hysteronotal setae (J3
and/or J4) and they show considerable variation. On
the original illustration of the type (Berlese 1910: fig.
49) from Italy (Pm), the erectile hysteronotal setae
have marginal cilia which are so short and dense they
are hardly discernable. On the other hand Mahunka’s
(1980: figs. 11, 12) illustrations of these setae shows
the marginal cilia as long and medium-spaced to
sparse (22-27 on 1 side) with seta J4 slightly bigger
but similar to /3. Mahunka’s (1977: fig. 9) illustration
of J3 or J4 on a specimen from Vienna (Pe) is similar
to this latter description of the type. Seta J3 or J4
on a specimen from Komodo Island (Am) (Mahunka
1977: fig. 8) has short dense marginal cilia (about 56
on | side) and is almost parallel sided with an acutely
tapering tip, therefore, it is excluded from P. emmae.
Specimens from the Crimea (Pe) (Gordeeva 1980:
figs. 5, 6) have short medium spaced marginal cilia
(29-31 on | side) and should possibly also be excluded
from P. emmae.
In identifying the South Australian specimens,
Mahunka’s (1980) redescription of the type is
accepted, and the fact that there are more and denser
marginal cilia on setae J3 and J4 is regarded as an
intraspecific variation. A more comprehensive redes-
cription of the type may require that a new species
be established for this material.
Family SPHAEROCHTHONIIDAE Grandjean
Sphaerochthoniidae Grandjean, 1947a: 224.
Type-genus: Sphaerochthonius Berlese, 1910
Diagnosis: Cosmochthonioidea. Minute (237.5-375),
whitish to brown mites. One complete hinged hyster-
onotal fissure (TB1) present; second hysteronotal fis-
sure (7B2) just posterior to seta J2, but obscured by
anterior hysteronotal shield (VS1); 3rd hysteronotal
fissure (T7B3) present on larva or some nymphs in
region of seta J3, rarely represented on adult, although
sometimes transverse dorsal ridges near setae /3 and
J4, No hysteronotal setae erectile or long (not as long
as distance between setal bases J/ and J/4) and,
except setae J2 and Z2, all ciliate and seta 21 T-
shaped. Setae J2 and Z2 simple, shorter than distance
between setal bases J2-J2, and normally under anterior
hysteronotal shield. Cowl without longitudinal slits.
Anterior cheliceral seta (ch2) pectinate with 3 prongs.
Tarsus I bearing 3 solenidia. Tarsi J-IV with 3 claws.
Remarks: Despite the superficial lack of similarity
between the Sphaerochthoniidae and the Cosmo-
chthoniidae, they have usually been regarded as closely
allied. Also (see above in the remarks on the Cos-
mochthonioidea) Sphaerochthoniidae has long been
regarded as allied to the Protoplophoridae although
355
this is not reflected in the classification by Balogh
(1972). Regarding the relationship of the Sphacro-
chthoniidae and Protoplophoridae, the nature of the
prehysteronotal fissure is an important character com-
mented on in the remarks on Sphaerochthonius splen-
didus.
The Sphaerochthoniidae includes only a single
genus: Sphaerochthonius Berlese, 1910a.
SPHAEROCHTHONIUS Berlese
Sphaerochthonius Berlese, 1910: 223. Type designation
(original): “Hypochthonius splendidus Berl.”.
Type-species: Sphaerochtonius splendidus (Berlese,
1904: 26).
Diagnosis: Sphaerochthoniidae (monogeneric).
Distribution: Widespread—Canada (Nn), California
(Nc); Brazil (NTc); Ghana (Ew); Somali (Ee); Cau-
casus, Crimea (Pe); Algeria, Greece, Italy, Morocco
(Pm); Japan (Pc); Java (Om); Komodo Island (Am);
South Australia (Aa).
Remarks: Sphaerochthonius is an easily recognis-
able genus, but delineating the included species is
difficult. The unusually small specimen before me
has been placed in the type-species, S. splendidus,
which was originally described from the Mediterra-
nean region. The reason for this placement is partly
because the poor descriptions of a long established
species make it less exclusive. In order to give some
idea of the degree of similarity of the South Australian
specimen to other species, | have given a short
description of the other species.
In describing S. suzukii, Aoki (1977) has reviewed
the genus, especially with regard to the form of the
somal setae. In referring to hysteronotal setae J2 and
Z2 (as dl and d2), he regards the fact that they are
short and simple as diagnostic of S. suzukii. In fact
this attribute is true for the South Australian speci-
men, the larva of an unnamed species (Grandjean
1934: fig. 2) and for S. suwblanatus (Mahunka 1977a:
fig. 7). In the case of S. swblanatus and S. suzukii,
the mite drawn is slightly squashed and the anterior
hysteronotal fissure (7B1) has opened up so that setae
J2 and Z2 are no longer obscured by the anterior
hysteronotal shield. On the illustrated specimen of S,
suzukii, the second hysteronotal shield (N.S2) appears
fused to shield NS3, whilst for S. swblanatus it is
attached to shield NS1. It is likely that in other
species where setae J2 and Z2 are obscured they
have not been described and so what Aoki (1977)
would regard as setae J2 and Z2 are in fact J3 and
Z3.
The 7 species included in Sphaerochthonius are
considered below mainly in alphabetical order but
356
with S. splendidus, in which the South Australian
specimens are grouped, last.
Sphaerochthonius gemma (Oudemans)
Hypochthonius gemma Oudemans, 1909: 319.
Sphaerochthonius elegans Berlese, 1910: 266.
Cosmochthonius gemma (Oudemans): Oudemans,
1917: 25.
Sphaerochthonius gemma (Oudemans): van der
Hammen, 1959: 26,
All specimens regarded as nymphs since few genital
setae and only | claw on each of its pretarsi. Length,
268 (ex Java—Om). All illustrated notal setae, except
z2, T-shaped, ciliate and stick-like. Two branches of
hysteronotal setae subequal in length. Setae in hys-
teronotal ranks, 3, 4 and 5 with horizontal branches
directed transversely. Two heavy lines in illustration
(Oudemans 1917: fig. 51) run through setae J3 and
J4 and I agree with Grandjean (1932a: 34) that they
represent dorsal ridges, because posterior line would
otherwise have to be a 4th fissure.
Sphaerochthonius longisetus Mahunka
Sphaerochthonius longisetus Mahunka, 1977a: 256.
Length, 360-374 (ex Komodo Island—Am). Many
dorsal setae (jl, j2, JI, Z1, S1, S2, 24, J5, S5)T-
shaped, papillose and leaf-like. Seta j1 similar but
ciliate. Setae s1, ?s2, J3 and Z3 unbranched, papil-
lose and stick-like; seta J3 unusually long (about
distance between setal bases Z1-Z2).
Sphaerochthonius phyllophorus Balogh and Mahunka
Sphaerochthonius phyllophorus Balogh and
Mahunka, 1969: 32.
Length, 289-319 (ex Brazil—NTb). Setae J1, zl,
j2 T-shaped and possible intermediate between stick-
like and leaf-like. “Anterior” hysteronotal setae T-
shaped, papillose and leaf-like, “Posterior” hysteron-
otal setae unbranched, papillose and leaf-like.
Sphaerochthonius suzukii Aoki
Sphaerochthonius suzukii Aoki, 1977: 85.
Length, 310 (ex Japan—Pc). Most notal setae cil-
iate (short, blunt cilia) and stick-like. Setae jl, z1,
J1, Z1, Sl, $2, J5, Z5, SS, J6 T-shaped, whilst s1,
j2, 82, J3, Z3, Z4 unbranched. Setae Z6 and S6, like
setae in file Za, unbranched, slim with long, tapering
cilia. Transverse dorsal ridge passes just posterior to
seta J3.
Sphaerochthonius transversus Wallwork
Sphaerochthonius transversus Wallwork, 1960: 377,
Length, 256-277 (ex Ghana—Ew). Form of notal
setae similar to S. gemma , especially since horizontal
REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (15): 327-359
June, 1982
branches of setae J3 and Z3 directed transversally
(not an artifact, occurs on living specimens) and 2
branches of each seta similar in length. Different,
since setae s1 and j2 unbranched. Apparently dorsal
ridge associated with 3rd hysteronotal setal rank, no
such ridge associated with 4th rank as on S. gemma.
Nymphs grouped in this species have long seta J3
like S. /ongisetus and may not be conspecific.
Sphaerochthonius wallworki n.sp.
Sphaerochthonius spec. Wallwork, 1960: 382.
Length, 298 (ex Ghana-Ew). As pointed out in
original description, this species very similar to S.
gemma, having 2 transverse dorsal ridges passing
along 3rd and 4th hysteronotal setal ranks, and mainly
T-shaped, ciliate, stick-like setae. On the other hand,
seta j2 unbranched and horizontal branches of setae
J3 and Z3 directed longitudinally with shorter ante-
rior branch. Nymph grouped in this species with
horizontal branches of setae /3 and Z3 directed trans-
versely as S. gemma. Despite 4 setae in file Za, not
certain that this nymph belongs to S. wallworki.
Sphaerochthonius splendidus (Berlese)
(Fig. 30)
Hypochthonius splendidus Berlese, 1904: 26, fig. 37.
Sphaerochthonius splendidus (Berlese): van der
Hammen, 1959: 25.
Adult
Length, 237.5 (1). Hysteronotum light brown, pro-
teronotum mid-brown. Cuticle covered by granulated
hyaline adhesive layer. On soma, network of lines
(with granules clustered around) encloses 5-sided or
6-sided areas. Granules also clustered around notal
setae. Refractile parts (external malae, cheliceral
extremities, setae and claws) paler than general inte-
gument.
Single specimen illustrated (Fig. 30), slightly
squashed by coverslip, but natural body-form laterally
compressed like PAthiracarus (Holonotina) or Pro-
toplophora (this subcohort). Anterior 2 pairs of legs
curl up under edges of proteronotum whilst posterior
2 pairs of legs curl up under flaps from pleural
shields. Adanal shields may be capable of closing
over anal shields. No evidence confirming acutely
hinged prehysteronotal fissure, but soma looks capa-
ble of folding so that cowl covers genital shield.
Anterior transverse hysteronotal fissure (7B1) also
appears hinged. By squashing mite, second hyster-
onotal shield (NS2—narrow band bearing setae /2
and Z2) moves backwards from under anterior hys-
teronotal shield (VS1) near level of setae JI and Z1
to be exposed at almost level of setae J3 and Z3. In
illustration (Fig. 30), posterior of 4 broken transverse
lines appears to represent posterior edge of folded
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SOLLS 487
hyaline membrane between venter of first byster-
onatal shield (VS1) and anterior edge of second hys-
teronotal shield (NS2), Reticulate hyaline adhesive
layer passes unbroken across anterior transverse hys-
teronotal fissure so that any movement of shields
could mean rupturing this. layer.
Legs difficult to observe because folded up, Tro-
chanter and femur [II and IV similar to Cosmto-
chthonius. Pretarsus 1V with 3 claws (stout central
claw, 2 slim lateral claws). Adanal setae Za and
hysleronotal setae J6, Z6 and S6 simular io J4. File
Za includes 4 setae. Single, dense granular bolus
present, but no eggs observed inside specimen.
Material examined: One adult (N1979385), grass
and moss or litter under Eucalyptus viminalis, savan-
nah woodland, Chambers Gully, 12.6.1974, D. C.
Lee.
Distribution- Medilerranean-type climate: Italy,
Greece (Pm); South Australia (Aa). South Australia:
Chambers Gully, savannah woodland, 1 (1/8),
Remarks: The specimen from South Australia,
although much smaller than the type (310), can be
grouped in S. splendidus. Because [ have not wished
to damage the single specimen, the description is
unusually limited. Earlier work on the hysterosomal
shields of ihe adult (Grandjean 1932a) and larva
(Grandjean 1934) of a Sphaerochthonius species,
indicating a hinged first transverse hysteronotal is-
sure that is folded forward under the anterior shield,
is confirmed, which clarifies some of the confusion
about hysteronotal fissures resulting from more recent
descriptions of Sphaerachthonius. Furthermore, the
presence or absence of small simple setae in the
second hysteronotal rank as allribules to distinguish
species can now be seen as resulling from these setae
sometimes being hidden, Unfortunately, I have not
established whether or not the transverse prehyster-
onotal fissure is acutely hinged or not. Lf the proter-
onotum can be folded right down, distinguishing the
Cosmochthonioidea from the Protoplophoroidea may
not be tenable.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
] am indebted to the Interim Council of the Aus-
tralian Biological Resources Study for funds for
equipment, and to the Mark Mitchell Research Foun-
dation and to the Science and Industry Endowment
Fund for funds to travel in connection with this pro-
ject,
| also appreciate the making available of certain
specimens for study by Dr J, Aoki (Yokohama
National University, Japan), Dr R. E, Crabill (Smith-
sonian Institution, U.S.A.) and Mr T, Moulton (Mac-
quarie University, N.S.W,). Thanks are due to Dr B.
G, M. Jamieson, University of Queensland, Brisbane
for commenting on the manuscript,
My greatest debt of gratitude is to Ms Jenni
Thurmer for her excellent illustrations and to Mra
Debbie Melloy for typmg this manuscript.
REFERENCES
AOKI, J. 1966. Studies on the oribatid mites of Sapan. WW, Tr-
SAL enNs simplex specnoy. Bull nain, Sci, Mus,, Tokva ®
AOKI, J, 1975. Two species of the primitive oribatid genus Gedy
povhthonius (rom Japan. Annotnes zeal. jap. 48 55-59.
AOKI, J. 1977, New and interesting species of oribatid mites fram
Kakeroma Island, southwest Japan. Acta arachn., Tokyo, 27
(spec. number); 85-93,
BALOGH, J. 1942. Muagyaroszag poncélosatka) (canspectus cri-
bateorum Hungariae). Mal, femészetiud, Mazi. 39: 1-202.
BALOGH, J, 1961. Identification keys of world oribatid (Acari)
families and genera, Acta vol, hung. 7: 243-344.
BALOGH, J. 1972. The orihatid genera of the world. Akademii
Kiado, Budapest, 188 pp, 77 pls.
BALOGH, J. and MAHUNKA, S, 1969. The zoological results of
the Hungarian Soil Zoological Expeditions to South Amorica
If. Acari: oribatids from the matertal of the second expedition,
|. Opuse. zo0l. Gest, 9 31-69.
BECK, L. 1962, Béitrage zur Kenntnis der neoiropischen Oriba-
udenfauna, |. Eohypochthonius und Cosmachthanius (Arach.,
Acari), Senckenberg, biol. 43: 227-236.
BELER, M, 1956. Hin neuer Blorhrus (Pseudoscorp.) aus Sardinien,
und usber zwei Pseudoscorpione des westmediterranen Litur-
als. Fragm. ent. 2: 55-63.
BERLESE, A, 1903, Acari nuovi. Manipulus lus, Redia 1; 235-
ade
BERLESE, A. 1904. Acari nuovi, Manipulus I. Redia 2: 10-22,
BERLESE, A. 19104. Acari nuovi, Manipulus V, VI. Redia 6:
199-234,
BERLESE, A. 1910b, Liste di nuove specie e nuovi genert di
Acari. Redia 6: 242-271.
CHAKRABARTI, D. K., BHADURI, A, K. and RAYCHALU-
DHURI, D. N., 1972. One new Species and a new subspecies
of Oribatid mites (Acari, Oribatei) fram West Bengal, India,
Alcta aravhn,, Tokyo, 24: 86-90.
CHINONE, S, 1974. Further contribution to the knowledge of the
family Brachychthoniidae from Japan. Bull. dbiageogr. Sve,
Japan 30: 1-28.
CHINONE, 8. 1978. Additional report on the soil mites of the
family Brachychthoniidae from Japan. Bull biogeogr. Sue.
Japan 33; 9-32.
CHINONE, 'S. and AOKI, J. 1972, Soil mites of the fannly
Beaghyeltponlider from Japan, Bull. aatn. Sci, Mus., Tokyo
COVARRUBIAS, R. 1968. Some observations an Antarctic Ori-
batei (Acarina) Liochthonius australis sp.n., and two Oppia
ssp-n., Acarologia 10; 313-356.
EVANS, G. OG. 1952. British mites of the genus Bruchychihonius
Berl., 1910. Ann. Mag. nal. Hist, ser 12 S: 227-239,
EWING, H E, 1917. A synopsis of [he genera of beetle mites
With special reference to the North American fauna, tna, ear,
Soc, Am, 10; (17-132.
FORSSLUND, K.-H. 1942. Schwedische Oribatei (Acari) |. Ark.
Zvol, 34, I-11
GORDEEVA, E, V, 1978, Anew genus of ortbatid mites from
Eust Crimea. Avel, 4h, $7: 1099-1101 (in Russian, English
summary ),
GORDEEVA, B V- (980. Ortbatid unites of the family Cosmo-
chthonitdue (Oribatei) Zv0/, Zh S9° K3R-850 (in Russias,
English summary).
GRANDIEAN, F. 1932. La famille des Protoplopharidae (Acur-
ins). Bull Soe. z60l, Fr. ST; 10-36.
358
GRANDIJEAN, F. 1932b. Au sujet des Palaecariformes Tragardh.
Bull. Mus. natn. Hist. nat., Paris (2) 4: 411-426,
GRANDJEAN, F. 1933. Etude sur le développement des Oribates.
Bull. Soc. zool. Fr. 58: 30-61.
GRANDIJEAN, F. 1934, La notation des poils gastronotiques et
des poils dorsaux du propodosoma chez les Oribates (Acariens).
Bull. Soc. zool. Fr. 59: 12-44.
GRANDIJEAN, F. 1941. Observations sur les Acariens (6° série).
Bull. Mus. natn. Hist. nat., Paris (2) 13: 532-539.
GRANDJEAN, F. 1942. La chaetotaxie comparée des pattes chez
les Oribates (2° série). Bull. Soc. zool. Fr. 67: 40-53.
GRANDIJEAN, F. 1946. La signification évolutive de quelques
caractéres des Acariens (1 série). Bull. biol. Fr. Belg. 79: 297-
325.
GRANDIJEAN, F. 1947a. Les Enarthronota (Acariens). Premier
série. Annis Sci. nat., Zool. (11) 8: 213-248.
GRANDJEAN, F. 1947b. L’origine de la pince mandibulaire chez
lez acariens actinochitineux. Archs Sci. phys. nat. Genéve (5)
29: 305-355.
GRANDJEAN, F. 1948. Les Enarthronota (Acariens) (2° série).
Annls Sci. nat., Zool. (11) 10; 29-58.
GRANDJEAN, F. 1950a, Observations sur les Oribates (20° série).
Bull. Mus. natn. Hist. nat., Paris (2) 22: 73-80.
GRANDJEAN, F. 1950b. Les Enarthronota (Acariens) (3° série).
Annls Sci. nat., Zool. (11) 12: 85-107,
GRANDJEAN, F. 1954a. Essai de classification des Oribates (25°
série). Bull, Soc. zool, Fr. 78: 421-446.
GRANDJEAN, F. 1954b. Les Enarthronota (Acariens) (4° série).
Annls. Sci. nat., Zool, (11) 16: 311-335.
GRANDJEAN, F. 1957. L’infracapitulum et la manducation chez
les Oribates et d’autres Acariens. Annls. Sci. nat., Zool. (11)
19: 233-281.
GRANDJEAN, F. 1962. Nouvelles observations sur les Oribates
(2° série). Acarologia 4: 396-422.
GRANDIJEAN, F. 1963, Sur deux espéces de Brachychthoniidae
et leur développement (Oribates). Acarologia 5: 122-151.
GRANDJEAN, F. 1964, La solénidiotaxie des Oribates. Acarologia
6: 529-556.
GRANDJEAN, F, 1965. Nouvelles observations sur les Oribates
(4¢ série). Acarologia 7; 91-112.
GRANDIJEAN, F. 1969. Considérations sur le classement des Ori-
bates. Leur division en 6 groupes majeurs. Acarologia 11: 127-
153.
HAMMEN, L. van der. 1952. The Oribatei (Acari) of the Neth-
erlands. Zool. Verh., Leiden 17: 1-139.
HAMMEN, L. van der. 1959. Berlese’s primitive Oribatid mites.
Zool. Verh,, Leiden 40: 1-93.
HAMMER, R. 1952. Investigations on the microfauna of Northern
Canada. Part I. Oribatidae. Acta arct. 4: 1-108.
HAMMER, M. 1958, Investigations on the oribatid fauna of the
Andes Mountains. 1. The Argentine and Bolivia. Biol. Skr,
11: 1-129, 34 pls.
HAMMER, M. 1961. Investigations on the oribatid fauna of the
Andes Mountains. I], Peru. Biol. Skr. 11: 1-157, 43 pls.
HAMMER, M. 1962. Investigations on the oribatid fauna of the
Andes Mountains, III. Chile. Biol, Skr. 12: 1-96, 30 pls.
HAMMER, M. 1966. Investigations on the oribatid fauna of New
Zealand. Part I. Biol. Skr. 12: 1-108, 45 pls.
JACOT, A, P. 1936. Some primitive moss-mites of North Carolina.
J. Elisha Mitchell scient. Soc. 52: 20-26, 1 pl.
JACOT, A. P. 1938. More primitive moss-mites of North Caro-
lina—III. J. Elisha Mitchell scient. Soc, 54; 127-137, 3 pls.
JACOT, A. P. 1939. New mites from the White Mountains. Occ.
Pap. Boston Soc. nat. Hist, 8: 321-332.
KOCH, C. L. 1836. Deutschlands Crustaceen, Myriapoden und
Arachniden, fasc. 3 (19). F. Pustet, Regensburg.
REC. 8S. AUST. MUS., 18 (15): 327-359
June, 1982
KRANTZ, G. W. 1978. A manual of acarology. Oregon State
University: 509 pp.
KRIVOLUTSKY, D. A. 1964. Sellnickochthonius gen.n.—new
genus of oribatid mites from the family Brachychthoniidae
Balogh, 1943 (Acariformes, Oribatei). Zool. Zh. 43: 935-936
(in Russian, English summary, not seen),
LEE, D. C. 1981. Sarcoptiformes (Acari) of South Australian soils.
1, Notation, 2, Bifemorata and Ptyctima (Cryptostigmata).
Rec. S, Aust. Mus. 18: 199-222.
McDANIEL, B. and BOLEN, E. G. 1980. A new species of
Phyllozetes Gordeeva from Texas (Cryptostigmata: Cosmo-
chthoniidae). Int. J. Acarol. 6: 225-228.
MAHUNKA, S. 1977a. Neue und interessante Milben aus dem
Genfer Museum XX. Contribution to the Oribatid Fauna of
S.E. Asia (Acari, Oribatida). Revue suisse Zool. 84: 247-274.
MAHUNKA, 8S. 1977b. Neue und interessante Milben aus dem
Genfer Museum XXXI. A remarkable sample of archaic soil
ro ae Kenya (Acari: Oribatida). Revue suisse Zool. 84:
63-479,
MAHUNKA, S. 1980, Data to the knowledge of mites preserved
in the “Berlese Collection” (Acari: Tarsonemina, Oribatida).
IL. Folia ent. hung. 41 (33): 105-121.
MARSHALL, V. G. and REEVES, R. M. 1970. Trichthonius
majestus, a new species of oribatid mites (Acarina: Cosmo-
chthoniidae) from North America. Acarologia 12: 623-632.
MICHAEL, A. D. 1885. New British Oribatidae. J] R. microsco.
Soc. 5: 385-397, 1 pl.
MICHAEL, A.D. 1888. British Oribatidae, vol. 2. Ray Society,
London: pp 337-657, 31 pls.
MORITZ, M. 1976a. Revision der europaischen Gattungen und
Arten der Familie Brachychthoniidae (Acari, Oribatei). Teil
1. Allgemeiner Teil: Brachychthoniidae Thor, 1934. Spezieller
Teil: Liochthonius v.d. Hammen, 1959, Verachthonius nov.gen.
pe Paraliochthonius nov.gen.. Mitt. zool. Mus. Berl. 52: 27-
136.
MORITZ, M. 1976b. Revision der europaischen Gattungen und
Arten der Familie Brachychthoniidae (Acari, Oribatei) Teil 2.
Mixochthonius Neidbala, 1972, Neobrachychthonius nov.gen.,
Synchthonius v.d, Hammen, 1952, Poecilochthonius Balogh,
1943, Brachychthonius Berlese, 1910, Brachychochthonius
Jacot, 1938, Mitt. zool. Mus. Ber], 52: 227-319.
NIEDBALA, W. 1972a. Studies on the family Brachychthoniidae
(Acari, Oribatei). I. Revision of the genera and description of
one new species. Bull. Acad. pol. Sci. Sér. biol. 20: 661-669.
NIEDBALA, W. 1972b. Catalogue of all known species of Bra-
chychthoniidae (Acari, Oribatei). Acarologia 14; 292-313.
NIEDBALA, W. 1973. Studies on the family Brachychthoniidae.
(Acari, Oribatei). I]. Notes concerning the evolution of genera.
Bull. Acad. pol. Sci. SeF biol, 21: 59-64.
NORTON, R. A. 1975. Elliptochthoniidae, a new mite family
(Acarina: Oribatei) from mineral soil in California. J/. N.Y.
ent. Sac. 83: 209-216.
NORTON, R. A. 1977. A review of F. Grandjean’s system of leg
chaetotaxy in the Oribatei (Acari) and its application to the
family Damaeidae: 33-62—In: D. L. Dindal, ed., Biology of
Oribatid Mites, S.U.N.Y. College of Environmental Science
and Forestry, Syracuse.
NORTON, R. A. 1980. Observations on phoresy by oribatid mites
(Acari: Oribatei). Internat. J. Acarol. 6: 121-130.
OUDEMANS, A. C. 1909. Acarologische Aanteenkeningen XXVI.
Ent, Ber., Amst. 2: 317-320,
OUDEMANS, A. C. 1917. Notizen iiber Acari, 25. Reihe. (Trom-
bidiidae, Oribatidae, Phthiracaridae). Arch. Naturgesch. 82:
1-84, 1 pl.
REEVES, R. M, and MARSHALL, V. G. 1971. Redescription
and chaetotaxy of Brachychthonius lydiae adults and nymphs
(Acarina: Oribatei). Ann. ent. Soc. Am, 64; 317-325.
RYABININ, N. A. and KIVOLUTZKY, D. A. 1977. A new
genus and species of the family Heterochthoniidae. Zool. Zh.
56; 1729-1731 (in Russian, English summary).
SARCOPTIFORMES (ACARI) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SOILS
SELLNICK, M. 1928. Formenkreis: Hornmilben, Oribatei. Tierw.
Mitteleur. 3 (9): 1-42.
SIMPSON, G. G. 1945. The principles of classification and a
classification of mammals. Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 85: 1-
350.
STRENZKE, K. 1951. Die norddeutschen Arten der Gattungen
Brachychthonius und Brachychochthonius (Acarina: Oribatei).
Dt. zool. Z. 1; 234-249.
STRENZKE, K. 1963. Entwicklung und Verwandtschaftsbezie-
hungen der Oribatidengattung Gehypochthonius (Arach.,
Acari). Senckenberg. biol, 44: 231-255.
THOR, S. 1934. Neue Beitrige zur Kenntnis der invertebraten
Fauna von Svalbard. Zool. Anz. 107: 114-139.
TRAVE, J. 1967. Phyllochthonius aoutii nov.gen., nov.spec., un
Enarthronota (Acarien Oribate) nouveau de Cote d’Ivoire,
359
avec la création d’une superfamille nouvelle, Phyllochthon-
oidea. Zool. Meded., Leiden 42: 83-105.
WALLWORK, J. A. 1960. Some oribatei from Ghana. 1. Sampling
localities. II, Some members of the Enarthronota Grand).
Acarologia 2: 368-388.
WEIS-FOGH, T. 1948. Ecological investigations on mites and
collemboles in the soil. Natura jutl. 1: 135-270.
WILLMANN, C. 1928. Die Oribatidenfauna nordwestdeutscher
und einiger siiddeutscher Moore. Abh. naturw. Ver, Bremen
27. 143-176.
WILLMAN, C. 1931. Moosmilben oder Oribatiden (Oribatei).
Tierwelt Dtl. 22: 79-200.
WOMERSLEY, H. 1945. Australian Acarina. The genera Bra-
chychthonius Berl. and Cosmochthonius Ber|. (Hypochthonidae-
Oribatoidea). Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 8: 219-223.
POLYCLAD TURBELLARIANS FROM THE
SOUTHERN COASTS OF AUSTRALIA
BY STEVEN PRUDHOE
Summary
Eighteen species of polyclad turbellarians are recorded from the southern coasts of Australia, 14 of
which are from South Australia and 4 from Victoria. Of the South Australian species, 2 are also
recorded from Tasmania, and | of the Victorian species has been recorded hitherto only from South
Australia. Of the species dealt with, 3 are regarded as new to polyclad systematics, and these are:
Notoplana distincta sp.nov., and Pseudoceros lividus sp.nov., from South Australia and
Candimboides cuneiformis gen. et sp.nov. from Victoria. The genus Ancoratheca is diagnosed. The
descriptions are extended for the following 5 species: Ancoratheca australiensis, Notoplana
longicrumena, Planocera edmondsi, Cestoplana meridionalis and Cycloporus australis. Three
known species, Euplana gracilis, Echinoplana tenerrima and Pseudoceros reticulatus show very
wide gaps in their geographical distribution, suggesting that polyclads may be artificially
transported from one part of the world to another, where they may settle, if conditions are suitable.
POLYCLAD TURBELLARIANS FROM THE SOUTHERN COASTS OF AUSTRALIA
by
STEPHEN PRUDHOE
British Museum (Natural History), London, England
(Manuscript accepted 14 July 1981)
ABSTRACT
PRUDHOE, 8. 1981. Polyclad turbellarians from the southern
coasts of Australia. Rec. 5, dust, Mus, 18 (16): 361-384,
Eighteen species of polyclad turbellarians are
recorded from the southern coasts of Australia, 14 of
which are from South Australia and 4 from Victoria.
Of the South Australian species, 2 are also recorded
from Tasmania, and | of the Victorian species has
been recorded hitherto only from South Australia, OF
the species dealt with, 3 are regarded as new to
polyclad systematics, and these are: Notaplana dis-
lineta sp.nov,, and Pseudoceros lividus sp,nov., from
South Australia and Candimboides cuneiformis gen.
et sp.nov. from Victoria. The genus Ancoratheca is
diagnosed. The descriptions are extended for the fal-
lowing 5 species: Amcorarheca australiensis, Nota-
plana longicrumena, Planocera edmondsi, Cestoplana
meridtonalis and Cycloporus australis, Three known
species, Euplana gracilis, Echinoplana tenerrima and
Pseudoceras reticulatus show very wide gaps in their
geographical distribution, suggesting that polyclads
may be artificially transported from one part of the
world to another, where they may settle, if conditions
are suitable.
INTRODUCTION
Background, Methods and Acknowledgements
The following report is based chiefly on a collection
at polyclad turbellarians housed in the South Austra-
lian Museum, and for the pleasure of studying this
material the writer is indebted to Mr David C. Lee
and Mr Ifor M, Thomas. Grateful acknowledgement
is made to Dr 8. J. Edmonds, formerly the University
of Adelaide, Mr S, A, Shepherd of the Department
of Fisheries, Adelaide, Dr G. C, B. Poore of the
Minisiry of Conservation, Melbourne, and Mr Neville
Coleman of the Marine Photographic Index, Caring-
bah, N.S.W,, for sending specimens to the writer at
different times during the pasi 25 years.
Little has been published on polyclads of the coasts
of South Australia and Victona and it is therefore
not surprising that of the 18 dealt with here only
Notoplana australis (Schmarda) and Haploplana rosea
Prudhoe have been recorded previously from these
coasts. Fourteen species are here recorded from South
Australia for the first time, and of these 7 are new.
Of the known species, 5 have beet recorded from the
vicinily of Part Jackson, N.S.W., 2 from the coast of
Victoria, and 1, Thvsanozaon skoitshergi Bock, from
the coast of Wester Australia. Of the 4 species now
recorded from Victoria, only 1 has been recorded
from other Australian coasts, bul whether or not this
relationship denotes any zoogeographical significance
requires further investigation of the polyclad fauna of
Victoria, especially as Bennett and Pope (1960) indi-
cate the Victorian coast as a cold-lemperature zone
situated between 2 warm-temperate regions. Hitherto,
only 2 species of polyclads have been recorded from
Tasmania, namely, Notoplana australis and Microcelis
schauinslandt Plehn, bul the number is now increased
to 4 with the records af Planocera edmonadsi Prudhoe.
and Pseudaceras reticulatus Yer and Kaburaki,
The present study and a review of the literature,
sugpest that Noroplana australis is probably the com-
monest species of polyclad inhabiting the southern
and south-eastern coasts of Australia. Moreover, the
species has alsu been recorded from New Zealand
and Chile.
The occurrence of Euplana gracilis, Echinoplana
lenerrime and Pseudoceros reticulatus, inhabitants
of other regions of the oceans, in the present collections
reveals an important problem in the study of the
geographical distribution of polyclad turbellarians,
for it now seems that some species are or have been
transported artificially by some means or other from
their endemic areas to very distant localities offering
suitable habitats. This observation gives some credence
to Laidlaw's (1904) record of the north-eastern Atlan-
tic boreal polyclad Cryptocelides loveni Bergendal
occurring in Port Phillip Bay, Victoria—the authen-
ticity of this record has always been doubted by
subsequent writers, even by Laidlaw himself.
The examination of the above-mentioned material
has been carried out on whole specimens cleared in
methyl saheylate and on longitudinal serial-sections
of copulatory complexes cut at 10 wm and double-
stained with haemalum and cosin, For the preparation
of the serial sections, the writer would like to thank
Mr D. W. Cooper of the Histology Section of the
British Museum (Natural History)..
Deposition is in the Australian Museum, Sydney,
Australia (AM); British Museum (Natural History),
London, England (BM); National Museum of Victoria,
Melbourne, Australia (NMY); and South Austrahan
Museum, Adelaide, Australia (SAM).
362
List of Species
From South Australia
Discocelis australis Hyman
Enterogonia orbicularis (Schmarda)
Ancoratheca australiensis Prudhoe
Notoplana australis (Schmarda)
Notoplana longicrumena Prudhoe
Planocera edmondsi Prudhoe
Echinoplana tenerrima Haswell
Cestoplana meridionalis Prudhoe
Pseudoceros reticulatus Yeri and Kaburaki
Pseudoceros lividus sp.nov.
Notoplana distincta sp.nov.
Tripylocelis typica Haswell
Thysanozoon skottsbergi Bock
Cycloporus australis Prudhoe
From Victoria
Latocestus sp.innom.
Euplana gracilis (Girard)
Candimboides cuneiformis gen. et sp.nov.
Hoploplana rosea Prudhoe
From Tasmania
Planocera edmondsi Prudhoe
Pseudoceros reticulatus Yeri and Kaburaki
SYSTEMATICS
Family DISCOCELIDIDAE Laidlaw, 1903, emended
Poche, 1926
Discocelis australis Hyman, 1959
Locality: South Australia—one specimen (acci-
dently destroyed) under rocks, West Is., S.A., Shep-
herd, 29.v.73.
Morphology: Broadly oval in outline, firm consist-
ency, about 18 mm long and about 12 mm maximum
width, which occurs in cephalic region. Ground colour
greyish white with tinge of brown along median line
on the dorsal surface. Surface also bears many scat-
tered dark brown spots, so evident in most species of
Discocelis Ehrenberg. Cerebral organ situated at about
4mm from anterior margin of the body and near
anterior end of pharynx. Eyes in region of cerebral
organ, arranged more or less in two elongate clusters
representing cerebral eyes. Tentacular eyes lie more
dorsally than cerebral eyes and disposed in two
rounded groups, laterally to cerebral eye-clusters.
Numerous very small anterior marginal eyes distrib-
uted in two or three irregular rows which extend
posteriorly to level of tentacular eyes. Distribution of
eyes precisely as figured by Hyman (1959). Mouth
opens into posterior region of the pharyngeal chamber,
at about 7 mm from hinder margin of body; common
genital pore about 3 mm posterior to mouth.
REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (16): 361-384
June, 1982
As seen in the whole specimen cleared in methyl
salicylate, the copulatory complexes, although not
fully developed, closely resemble those described and
figured by Hyman for Discocelis australis, originally
collected at Long Reef, near Sydney, N.S.W.
Family LATOCESTIDAE Laidlaw, 1903
Latocestus sp.innom.
Locality; Victoria—one fragmentary juvenile spec-
imen (NMV/G3292), Crib Point Benthic Survey; Stn.
41 N/5, Westernport, date unknown.
Morphology. Elongate, about 5 mm long, brownish
dorsally and ventrally. Eyes spread fanwise over
cephalic region and marginal eyes form complete
series round body.
Remarks: The genus Latocestus Plehn has not been
recorded hitherto from Australia, but it is widely
distributed in the tropical and temperate regions of
the Atlantic and Indo-Pacific Oceans. Of those species
recorded from the Indo-Pacific region, the present
form bears some resemblance to L. argus Laidlaw
and L. maldivensis (Laidlaw) in the coloration of the
body and in the distribution of the eyes.
Family STYLOCHIDAE Stimpson, 1857
Enterogonia Haswell, 1907
Diagnosis: Stylochidae with rudimentary tentacles.
Marginal eyes in complete series around body; cerebral
eyes merge with frontal eyes to spread fanwise ante-
riorly and join with marginal eyes; tentacular eyes
located nearer dorsal surface than cerebro-frontal eyes.
Genital pores well separated. Pair of vasa deferentia
unite to form ejaculatory duct; no seminal vesicle.
Prostatic organ very small and “free”. Penis-papilla
thick, unarmed. Vagina long, forming anteriorly-
directed loop from female antrum. Vagina terminating
in genito-intestinal canal.
Type-species: E. orbicularis (Schmarda, 1859)
Stummer-Traunfels, 1933.
Type-locality: although originally recorded from the
Chilean coast, Stummer-Traunfels states that
there is evidence that Schmarda’s specimens were
collected in New Zealand.
Remarks: The diagnosis of Enterogonia by Hyman
(1959) is modified mainly because of a reinterpretation
of the structure of the reproductive system (see mor-
phology of E. orbicularis).
Enterogonia orbicularis (Schmarda, 1859)
Synonymy: Polycelis orbicularis Schmarda, 1859;
Enterogonia pigrans Haswell, 1907; Enterogonia
pigrans var. novaezealandiae Bock, 1925; Enterogonia
orbicularis Stummer-Traunfels, 1933; Enterogonia
pigrans Hyman, 1959; Enterogonia orbicularis orbi-
POLYCLAD TURBEL] ARLANS FROM THE SOUTHERN COASTS OF AUST.
culariy Wyman, 1959: Enterogonia erbicularis pigrans
Hyman, 1959,
Diagnosis; Fleshy forms, oval or elliptical in outline,
varying from 10-34 mm long and 5-23 mm wide.
Dorsal surface greenish, pale olive-green, dark grey
or light brown, ofien with numerous greenish brown,
dark olive or brownish spots, Nuchal tentacles searcely
noticeable, Antetiorly-extending cerebral eyes com-
mence behind cerebral organ. Mouth situated cen-
trully; elongate pharynx in middle third of body, with
10-12 pairs of lateral folds. Long, narrow, ejaculatory
duct opening into ndrraw male antrum through
unarmed penis-papilla. Epithelial lining of “shell”-
chamber thrown into a spiral fold,
Localities: South Ausiralisa—2 specimens (SAM/
V243\-V2637 consisting of uncut portions and serial
sections), shore line, Ceduna. B. L. Baker, Nov. 1940;
| specimen (SAM/V¥2625-¥2630 consisting of an
uncut partion and serial sections), Whiltlebee Point.
W, Zeidler, 2417.75; specimens (BM/1980.5.1.25),
under stones, upper tidal zone, Port Noarlunga, St
Vineent Guld. 5, J. Edmonds, 24,x.53 and on Aldinga
Reef, St Vincent Gulf, S.A. Shepherd, 2.ix,72; spee-
imens (BM/1980.5.1.29), Japanese oysters. Caffin
Bay, near Port Lincoln S.A. Shepherd, date unknown:
specimen (BM/1980.5.1.30), south side of Salt Creek,
Tumby Bay, Spencer Gulf, S. J, Edinonds, date
unknown.
Morphology: The above specimens [rom South Aus-
tralia, measuring 9-22 mim in length, possess a very
small “free” prostatic organ and agree exactly wilh
that described by Bock (1925) and Stummer-Trauofels
(1933) in the New Zealand nvaterial. This organ may
be interpreted as a small swelling arising from the
dorsal wall of the ejaculatory duct, where the duct
turns ventrally to enter the penis-papilla. It is lined
with a glandulir epithelium provided with long cilia
and coaied with a musculature distinctly thicker than
that in the wall of the ejaculaiory duct. Neither
Haswell (1907) nor Hyman (1959) appear to have
recognized this organ in specimens from N.S,W.
Hyman (Fig. i8) depicts a dilation of the ejaculatory
duct and a thickening of its muscular wall (“a curved
chamber”) immediately before the duct turns ven-
trally, and it seems possible that she mistook the
Insignificant prostatic organ merely as a swelling of
the ejaculatory duct. Morcoyer, in the present mate-
rial, Where the prostatic organ opens into the ejacu-
lutory duct, the latter is provided with a relatively
thick musculature and further suggests that the male
complex in the material examined by Flaswell and
Hyman might not have been fully developed.
Remarks: These worms appear to associate with
colamivs of bivalve molluscs, but there is no direct
evidence that they are predatory on the colonics, even
theugh they undoubtedly scavenge among them by
464
feeding on dead or injured ammals. &. orbicularis
seems to be one of the better known Australian poly-
clads, for Haswell (1907) and Hyman (1959) des¢ribed
it from N.S.W, under the name Enterogenia pigrans,
and Bock (1925) deseribed specimens trom New Zea-
land and considered them to be so very closely related
to Maswell’s form that he gave them the name #arer-
ogonia pigrans var. novaezealaddiae, Stummer-
Traunfels (1933) redescribed Schmarda’s (1859) ong-
inal material of Polycelis orbicularis [rom New Zca-
land and considered it to be identical with &. pigrans
var. novaezealandiae Bock. The main differences
between the specimens from New Zealand and those
from Australia are found in the greater size (26-
34 mm in length of the former and 10-15 mim in the
latter) and the supposed absence of prostatic organ
in the latter. In addition (o these features, Hyman
(1959) stated that the New Zealand form differed
from the Australian one in ils less roomy male antrum,
in the larger penis-papilla, and in the lack of an
expanded lumen in the distal region of the vagina,
Bock (1925) rightly discounts the difference in size
as a specific character. Concerning the differences
listed by Hyman, with the exception of the prostatic
organ, (hey are merely variations influenced to a more
ar less degree by size and may be considered as
superficial and of no diagnostic importance,
ANCORATHECA Prudhoe, 1982
Diagnosis: Siylochidae with aval body. From anie-
rior end of pharynx, cerebro-frontal cyes spread [an-
wise over cephalic region; tentacular eyes in two sinall
groups among cerebro-lranlal eyes; marginal eyes var-
iably distributed, Genital pores adjacent. Accessory
and true seminal vesicles together forming, trilobed
or adnchor-shaped structure: prostatic organ muscular,
vlongale, with narrow lumen and smooth epithetial
lining; penis-papilla bearing short stylet, lying in penis-
pocket opening into male antrum through shallow
penisssheath. Vayina simple, terminating in Lang’s
vesicle sometimes opening on ventral surface of bady.
Type-species} Anceratheca australiensis Prudhoe,
1932
Other species: 4. pacifica (Bock, 1923).
Remarks: The single specimen of 4. austealienss
described below is grouped in the Slylochidae because
of the distribution of the eyes, the long pharynx «ind
the posterior positions of the copulatory complexcs.
li bears a sirong resemblance to Neesrylochus paci-
fieus Boek 1923, from Juan Fernandez ts. off the
coast of Chile. This similarity with N. pacificus seems
to indicate that the latter 1s not congencric with Lhe
type species of Neostylochus (N. fulvopunctatus Yeri
and Kaburaki 1918) from Japan. Por instance, N.
Julvopunctatiiy possesses a simple. clongate seminal
vesicle and 4 vagina bulbosa, whereas V, pacificus
364 REC. 8. AUST. MUS., 18 (16): 361-384
and A, australiensis have a trilobed seminal vesicle
and no vagina bulbosa, differences which are here
regarded as generically important. Therefore, the latter
2 species are grouped in Ancoratheca.
Ancoratheca australiensis Prudhoe, 1982
(Fig. 1)
Locality: South Australia—holotype (SAM/V2608-
V2612, consisting of an uncut portion and serial sec-
tions), 15 metres deep, Upper Spencer Gulf, S.A.
Shepherd, 5.ix.73.
Morphology: Fleshy, somewhat oval in outline,
rounded anteriorly, tapering posteriorly, and of firm
consistency. About 10 mm long and up to 6 mm wide.
Dorsal surface of body (when preserved in alcohol)
buff-coloured, dappled with dark spots, due to under-
lying gonads, except anteriorly and marginally, where
body is somewhat lighter in colour. No tentacles. Very
small marginal eyes disposed in three to five irregular
rows and confined to about anterior third of total
length of body. Cerebral organ somewhat bilobed. At
about 3.5 mm from anterior margin, further minute
eyes spread fanwise over the cephalic region to merge
with marginal eyes and may be regarded as cerebro-
frontal eyes. Among these, a short distance anteriorly
to the cerebral organ, there is a cluster of a few eyes
on either side of the median line. These are nearer
to dorsal surface of the body and may be regarded
as small clusters of tentacular eyes.
Pharynx narrow, about 6 mm long, mainly in pos-
terior half of body; shows no lateral folds, only a
slight rippling of lateral margins. Mouth opens into
hinder region of pharyngeal chamber. Numerous
intestinal branches extend to the periphery of body
and do not appear to anastomose.
Genital pores very close together and appear to
open into a short narrow genital atrium or a depression
in the body-wall, lying at about 2.5 mm from posterior
margin of the body. Near posterior end of the pharynx,
the vasa deferentia become exceedingly muscular and
form a pair of elongate accessory seminal vesicles
which are directed postero-dorsally above ‘genital
atrium.’ These open directly into a muscular seminal
vesicle directed antero-ventrally, parallel with, and to
left side of, accessory vesicles. Prostatic organ elongate
and lies parallel with, and close to right side of,
accessory seminal vesicles. It is invested with very
thick musculature consisting of an outer layer of
circular fibres and a doubly thick inner layer of
longitudinal fibres. Through these layers the efferent
ducts of extracapsular gland-cells pass to open into
narrow lumen of prostatic organ. Latter lined with a
shallow glandular epithelium, which shows no radial
or longitudinal folding. Short muscular ejaculatory
duct extends from seminal vesicle uniting with a
muscular prostatic duct and enters very small mus-
June, 1982
cular penis-papilla, armed with a short stylet. This
lies in a small penis-pocket, which opens into a small
antrum masculinum through a shallow penis-sheath.
Female antrum short and narrow, leading into a
relatively wide vagina lined with an exceptionally tall
ciliated epithelium. Numerous ‘shell’-glands open into
a short portion of distal half of vagina to form a
‘shell’ chamber, epithelium of which appears to be
thrown into four or five spiral folds. From ‘shell’-
chamber, vagina extends posteriorly for a short dis-
tance to receive short common duct of uterine canals.
From this union, vagina interna continues posteriorly
to open into a spacious arcuate Lang’s vesicle through
a sphincter. Inner end of vesicle narrows considerably
to open to exterior through a tiny pore situated at
about 0.5 mm posterior to common genital opening.
The epithelium of the proximal region of the vagina
interna is thrown into radial folds, a feature commonly
associated with the ‘stalk’ of Lang’s vesicle. Lang’s
vesicle is in poor histological condition but it appears
as a membranous structure lined with large gland-
cells containing a secretion staining weakly with eosin.
An interesting feature is that it contains small packets
of spermatozoa, one of which is clustered around the
sphincter at the union of the vagina and the vesicle.
A few individual spermatozoa are also present in the
proximal region of the vagina interna suggesting that
fertilization may take place in the uterine canals.
Further, it might be thought that the packets of
sperm had been deposited through the body-wall by
hypodermic impregnation with a penial stylet of
another worm, but this does not seem to be so because
the wall of Lang’s vesicle is fused to the tiny external
aperture.
Remarks: A. australiensis may be distinguished from
A. pacifica by the marginal eyes not completely encir-
cling the body and by Lang’s vesicle opening on the
ventral surface of the body.
The fusion of the musculature of the seminal vesicle
(which consists principally of circular fibres) with its
accessory vesicles appears to produce a structure sim-
ilar to the trilobed or tripartite seminal vesicle of the
genus Stylochus (Imogine). The tight clustering
together of the organs of the male copulatory complex
may not be normal but due to contraction of the
hinder region of the body.
The opening of Lang’s vesicle directly to the exterior
is very interesting, because it could be regarded as
the original condition of the ductus vaginalis found
in several acotylean polyclads, particularly among
species belonging to the family Stylochidae, Bock
(1925a), however, assumes that the ductus vaginalis
has been derived from the ‘stalk’ of Lang’s vesicle,
and he presents evidence to support this assumption,
with particular references to Discocoelides langi Ber-
gendal, where an accessory canal connects the ‘stalk’
directly to the antrum femininum. Whilst Bock’s
POLYCLAD TURBELLARIANS FROM THE SOUTHERN COASTS OF AUST.
assumption may be justified in some instances, it
should not be overlooked that in other instances the
ductus vaginalis might also have arisen solely from
Lang’s vesicle, which having made contact with the
exterior, as in the present form, eventually lost its
po
365
function solely as a receptaculum seminis and became
reduced to a narrow canal for the discharge of waste
reproductive materials, as well as for copulation, thus
being comparable with Laurer’s canal of trematodes
and the vagina of cestodes.
asv sv
sc Lv
FIG.1. Ancoratheca australiensis. A. Dorsal view. B. Sagittal section of copulatory complexes. asv., accessory seminal vesicles; Lv.,
Lang’s vesicle; po., prostatic organ; pp., penis-pocket; ps., penis-sheath; s., stylet; sc., “shell”-chamber; sv., seminal vesicle; uc.,
common uterine canal
Family LEPTOPLANIDAE Ehrenberg, 1831,
emended Stimpson, 1857
Euplana gracilis (Girard, 1850); Girard, 1895
(Fig. 2)
Locality: Victoria—one damaged specimen and
several fragments (BM/1980.5.1.11 and NMV/G3290
and G3291), Port Phillip Bay Environmental Study;
Stn. 137/3 and 137/5.
Morphology: Body delicate, elongate-oval; 3.25-
5.0 mm long, 0.9-1.75 mm maximum width (measure-
ments are estimates since no specimens complete). In
alcohol, dorsal surface yellowish brown with dark
brown spots from underlying ovaries; ventral surface
greyish. No tentacles. Cerebral organ 0.25 mm from
anterior end. Eyes few, in two rows each of 4-5 on
either side of cerebral organ. Mouth opens into middle
of pharyngeal chamber which lies in anterior half of
body closely behind cerebral organ. Pharynx has a
few pairs of shallow lateral pockets. Median intestinal
trunk extends from near cerebral organ to posterior
region giving off several pairs of lateral branches;
these anastomose initially but are free marginally.
Male and female genital pores separate and lie in
middle region well behind pharynx.
Remarks: Unfortunately, the histological condition
of the material does not permit of a precise exami-
nation for description, but sufficient has been made
out of the reproductive system to show that it is
undoubtedly comparable with that described by
Hyman (1939) in American specimens.
Euplana gracilis was known hitherto to occur only
on the Atlantic coast of North America, where,
according to Hyman (1940), it is common in the
benthic fauna of the boreal/warm temperate region
and ranges from Prince Edward Island, Canada, to
the western coast of Florida. Its occurrence in Port
Phillip Bay is therefore surprising, and it must be
assumed that the worm had somehow been transported
from America, possibly when eggs attached to the
366
hull of a ship hatched in Victorian waters. There 4s
also the possibility that they were carricd with oysters
or other animals and deposited in these waters. Bennett
and Pope (1960) apparently regard the Victorian coast
as a cold-temperate region, and it seems therefore to
be a suitable atea for Enplana gracilis-—clearly a
eurythermic species to establish itself,
Notoplana australis (Schmarda, 1859) Bock, 19]3
Synonymy: Polvoells australis Schmurda. 1859;
Leptaplana australis Laidlaw, 1904; Lepraplune
suleri Jucubowa, 1906; Noroplana australis
forma Asa Mareus, 1954,
Diagnosis: Body elongate oval, of variable size and
coloration. Nuchal tenlacles rudimentary or not
upparent. Byes of the cerebral groups smaller than
the tentacular eyes, Mouth in middle region of body;
pharynx with 12-17 pairs of lateral folds. Gemital
pores well separated. Seminal vesicle smaller than
prostatic organ, which has sia epithelial longitudinal
chambers, Penjs-papillu yery small and provided with
4 long stylet enclosed in elongate muscular penis-
pocket. Anirum masculinum narrow. Vagina bulbosa
large; Lang's vesicle clongute,
Localities. South Australia—specimen (SAM/
V¥2638-V2645— consisting of uncul portions dnd seria}
seclions). near Jones Island, Buird Bay,
W. Zeidler, 27.1).75; specimen (SAM/¥2640) under
tucks at Jow tide, Daly Head, Yorke Pernimsula,
W. Zeidler, 9.xi,76; specimen (SAM/¥V2647) Brown
Point, W. Zeidler, 9.viii.74; 2 specimens (SAM/V2648
and V2hd9), Wittelbee Point, neur Ceduna, W
Zeidler, 2.11.75; specimen (SAM /V2650) under inter-
tidal rocks, Pondalowie Bay, W. Zeidler, 9-xi. 7h: spee-
imen (BM/1980.5.1.8), Wittelbce Point, near Ceduna,
W. Zeidler, 2.111,75; speeitnen (BM/1980.5.1,9. in
part), under rocks, upper tidal zone, American River
Inlet, Kangaroo Island, S. J. Edmonds, Aug. 1946;
speeamen (BM/1980.5.1.9, in part) under rocks, upper
tidal zone, Port Noarlunga, St, Vincent Gull. Ss. J,
Edmonds, November 1950; specimen (BM/
1980.5.1.10), under stones, 5 metres of waler, Tipara
Reef. Spencer Gull. S.A. Shepherd, 25.v.73.
Morphology: This species has been adequately
described by Haswell (1907), Bock (1913) and Stunme
mer-Traunfels (1933), seems lo be exceedingly
variable in size, Existing records give the size of
preserved adult worms as 19-37mm_ long und
920 mim wide, bul Haswell records specimens up to
about 76mm in length when alive. Present adult
specimens are 15-32 mm long and 7-15 mm wide; one
immature specimen is 20mm long and 9 mm wide,
Haswell also records small sexually mature specimens
under [Onmm in length from New Zealand and sup-
Bests that they may be a dwarl varicly of N. wustralis.
Among the present material, a specimen from Baird
REC. S AUST. MUS. IS (16) 401384
June, IY82
Bay measures only 9 tom an length und 4mm in
maximum width, but although it has both sets of
copulalory complexes Lhere is no indication ol’ devel-
oping ova. Marcus (1954) recorded a similar form
from the coast of Chile and named it Noteplana
australis forma Atina, which he regarded as distinct
fron the dwarf form of Haswell and listed two or
(three morphological differences, but these appear to
have no systematic importance,
The coloration of the dorsal surface of this polyelad
varies greatly from almost black, through differing
shades of brown, to orange; Hyman (1959) records
specimens of vlive-grey or greenish grey. The present
adult specimens are greyish with an elongyte-oval
central area of pale brown; immature specimens a
dull white with a tinge of brown in the pharyngeal
region. The yentral surface of nature and immuture
worms is always somewhal lighter. The specimen
from the Tipara Reel was originally orange coloured,
inoltled with white above and belyw, The dorsal sur
face also hud a dark brown median band, due to the
underlying pharyax, and the shallow nuchal tentacles
were also of un orange colour with « whitish apex and
a band of white about midway along cach tentacle.
The area uround the base of each tentacle is without
colour, After prolonged unmersion in an aleohol pre-
servalive, his specimen has lost such coloration,
On the dorsal surface, at about the junction of the
first and second quarters of the total length of the
body, Haswell mentions the presenee of ‘iwo clear
culuurless rounded knobs om which tentacular groups
nf eyes are borne,” In the present specimens one may
uecasionally distinguish a pair ul very shallow bosses,
representing rudimentary tentacles, but in their place
in other specimens there may be a pair of clear
roundish areus in the region of the cerebral organ
dnd in them lie tentacular eyes. Laidlaw (1904) and
Jagubowa (1906) found rudimentary jentacles in
specimens from Australia, In Chilean specimens,
Marcus fuund rounded bosses as nuchal tentacles,
which were transparent in the living aninoal.
The pharynx lies in the middle third of the body
and possesses from $ to 15 pairs of lateral folds. The
main intestine hus 12 to 15 pairs of lateral branches,
whieh vamify towards the periphery of the body and
appear 16 anastomose Only in Ure pharyngeal region at
feature to be seen in other species of the pemis
Notoplana Laidlaw. In the posterior region of the
pharynx, the main intestine bifurcates and ihe arms
pass round the copulatory complexes, similarly, the
anterior end of the intestine bifureates and the limbs
pass round the cerebral organ.
The siructure of the copulatory complexes has been
sulficently deseribed by Haswell (1907) and well
figured by Bock (1913), Mareus (1954) and Hynian
()959) in sagittal or longitudifal section, The pras-
POLYCLAD TURBELLARIANS FROM THE SOUTHERN COASTS OF AUST. 367
tatic organ in the present material agrees with that
described by Laidlaw (1904) in having its epithelial
lining modified into six longitudinal chambers.
Remarks: Notoplana australis is evidently a common
and widely distributed species on the southern coasts
of Australia. In addition to the present material from
various localities on the South Australian coast, this
species has been recorded from Port Phillip, Victoria,
by Laidlaw (1904), from Tasmania by Haswell (1907)
and from N.S.W. by Schmarda (1859), Haswell
(1907), Stead (1907), Bock (1913) and by Hyman
(1959). It has also been recorded from New Zealand
in various localities extending from Lyttleton Harbour
northwards to Auckland Harbour by Schmarda
(1859), Jacubowa (1906) and by Haswell (1907).
Latterly, it has been recorded from the coast of Chile
between 20°S and 41°S by Marcus (1954).
Stead (1907) reported the destruction of oyster-
beds by “Leptoplana”’ australis in N.S.W. While
circumstantial evidence might point to this, it is more
likely that some other factor was reponsible, and that
the polyclads were merely engaged in cleaning up by
devouring dead and injured animals. In fact, Stead
speaks of the abundance of a polychaete predator and
the oyster-drill Urosalpinx among the oysters.
FIG, 2. Euplana gracilis. Anterior half of body, dorsal view
(bar-scale=0.5 mm.)
Notoplana distincta sp.nov.
(Fig. 3)
Diagnosis: Body elongate oval, 21.5 mm long and
pale yellowish brown. Eyes in two elongate cerebral
clusters. Mouth anterior to middle of body; pharynx
with 8 or 9 pairs of lateral folds. Genital pores well
separated. Seminal vesicle larger than prostatic
organ, which has four longitudinal epithelial cham-
bers. Penis-papilla in the form of a long stylet entirely
enclosed in penis-pocket. Antrum masculinum long
and narrow, lined with tall glandular epithelium
thrown into longitudinal folds. Antrum femininum
narrow, lined with glandular epithelium; Lang’s vesi-
cle small and bulbous.
Locality: South Australia—holotype
(BM/1980.5.1.5), under rock, upper tidal zone, Port
Noarlunga, Gulf St Vincent, S. J. Edmonds, Nov.
1950.
Morphology: Rounded anteriorly and tapering pos-
teriorly. Length, 21.5 mm; maximum width, 6 mm,
which occurs in the mid-region of the body. Dorsal
surface is pale yellowish brown. The cerebral organ
lies at about 4 mm from the anterior margin of the
body. Eyes are arranged in two elongate groups on
either side of the median line in the region of the
cerebral organ. There are 36 to 50 eyes in each group,
and in the hinder region of each group, on the postero-
lateral borders of the cerebral organ, lie 12 to 16
larger eyes more dorsally situated and represent the
tentacular eyes, although tentacles are absent.
The dorsal musculature of the body-wall is, as usual
in polyclads, less well developed than the ventral
musculature, but the basement membrane of the dor-
sal wall is about twice as thick and the epithelium
taller than that of the ventral wall.
The mouth lies at about 5 mm posteriorly to the
cerebral organ and a little behind the middle of the
pharyngeal chamber. The pharynx is situated a little
anteriorly to the middle of the body and measures
3.5 mm long. It possesses 8 or 9 pairs of lateral folds.
The intestinal branches appear to anastomose in the
pharyngeal region and terminate trichotomously in
the marginal zones of the body.
The male genital pore is situated in the central
region of the body, 3.5 mm posteriorly to the mouth,
and the female pore | mm behind the male and about
8 mm from the posterior end of the body.
The testes are scattered in the ventral parenchyma,
as far as the submarginal zones of the body. The vasa
deferentia arise on either side of the pharynx and
extend posteriorly to a level close behind the female
genital pore, where they turn inwardly to unite in the
median line to form a posterior loop. About midway
along their length, each vas deferens gives off a
medially-directed branch, which becomes much con-
voluted and swollen with sperm. These two branches
open independently into a muscular pyriform seminal
vesicle, the narrow end of which is directed anteriorly.
From the narrower end of the seminal vesicle, a short
ejaculatory duct runs dorsally to lead into a globular
prostatic organ provided with a relatively thick mus-
cular wall. The ejaculatory duct passes well into the
368
prostatic organ and is surrounded by a tall glandular
epithelium; in which there are four tubes lying par-
allel with the ejaculatory duct. The epithelial tubes
and the ejaculatory duct open into a small chamber
in the distal region of the prostatic organ. From this
organ, the ejaculatory duct turns posteriorly to enter
an elongate penis-papilla: The papilla is covered with
a membrane or perhaps a thin cuticle and lies entirely
REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (16): 361-384
June, 1982
within a penis-pocket. The proximal half of the penis-
pocket encloses the papilla and is lined with a mem-
brane or cuticle, similar to that covering the penis-
papilla, whereas the distal half of the penis-pocket is
lined with tall cilia. Through a shallow penis-sheath,
the pocket opens into a long narrow antrum mascu-
linum lined with a tall glandular epithelium thrown
into longitudinal folds.
vn of
Oo
e@ oP
°
29°® 9
FIG. 3. Notoplana distincta. A. Dorsal view. B. Arrangement of eyes (bar-scale=0.2 mm.) C. Sagittal section of copulatory complexes.
af., antrum femininum; am., antrum masculinum; Lyv., Lang’s vesicle; po., prostatic organ; pp., penis-pocket; s., stylet; sc., “shell”-
chamber; st., stalk of Lang’s vesicle; sv., seminal vesicle; uc., common uterine canal.
The dorsally-disposed ovaries are numerous and
widely scattered, extending farther into the submar-
ginal zones of the body than the testes. The uterine
canal on the right side of the pharynx extends ante-
riorly a little beyond the pharynx, whereas that on
the left side appears to be malformed, for it is thrown
into several coils alongside the hinder margin of the
pharynx. The posterior ends of the two uterine canals
unite to form a short common duct opening into the
vagina at the union of the vagina interna and the
“stalk” of Lang’s vesicle. The epithelium of the “‘stalk”
is thrown into radial folds, so that the lumen appears
moniliform in longitudinal section. Lang’s vesicle is
small and lies ata level a little posteriorly to the
female genital pore. It is lined with a highly glandular
epithelium and coated with a relatively thick mus-
culature. From the uterine opening, a short vagina
interna extends ‘anteriorly to enter a narrow “shell”
chamber, which soon turns ventrally to run posteriorly
to a point ventrally to the union of the uterine canals,
POLYCLAD TURBELLARIANS FROM THE SOUTHERN COASTS OF AUST.
where it curves ventrally to open into the antrum
femininum through a distinct conical papilla. The
“shell”-chamber is heavily invested with “‘shell”-glands
and lined with an epithelium bearing tall cilia. The
antrum femininum is narrow and lined with a tall
glandular epithelium.
Remarks: The features of this new species are the
forward position of the pharynx, the wide separation
of the male copulatory complex from the posterior
end of the pharynx, the widely-separated genital pores
in the middle third of the body and the glandular
nature of the male and female antra. A further feature
is the conical papilla through which the “shell”-cham-
ber opens into the antrum femininum, but this struc-
ture is unusual among polyclads, and it needs to be
confirmed as a characteristic of the species.
Notoplana longicrumena Prudhoe, 1982
(Fig. 4)
Diagnosis: Body elongate oval in outline, up to
25 mm in length; dorsal surface yellowish grey, tinged
with brown along median line; ventral surface greyish.
No nuchal tentacles. Eyes in two elongate groups.
Mouth centrally situated; pharynx with about 9 pairs
of lateral folds. Genital pores separated. Seminal vesi-
cle more or less as large as prostatic vesicle, which
has five longitudinal epithelial chambers; long penis-
papilla in form of stylet projecting well into male
antrum, which is narrow and deep. Antrum femininum
narrow; Lang’s vesicle bulbous.
Locality: South Australia—holotype (SAM/
V2651—V2665—consisting of uncut portion and 14
slides of _ serial sections), Point Brown,
W. Zeidler, 9.viii.74.
Morphology: It is elongate oval in outline, rounded
at both ends and measuring 25 mm long and 10 mm
wide. Its dorsal surface is yellowish grey, with a tinge
of brown in the middle region, while its ventral surface
is greyish. There is no indication of nuchal tentacles.
The mouth is centrally placed and opens into the
middle region of the pharyngeal chamber, which holds
a pharynx measuring about 6 mm in length and pos-
sessing about 9 pairs of lateral folds.
Eyes are disposed in two elongate groups extending
anteriorly for about 1 mm from the cerebral organ,
which is situated at about 5mm from the anterior
margin of the body. The two groups of eyes tend to
converge gradually as they move forward from the
cerebral organ, and each group consists of cerebral
and tentacular eyes, the latter being larger, nearer to
the dorsal wall of the body and laterally to the cerebral
organ and hinder cerebral eyes.
The dorsal epithelium of the body is higher than
the ventral epithelium, and the musculature of the
ventral wall is two to three times deeper than that in
the dorsal wall.
369
The male genital pore is situated 4 mm posteriorly
to the pharynx and the female pore 0.8 mm behind
the male. A pair of convoluted vasa deferentia orig-
inate in the ventral parenchyma on either side of the
median line, close behind the pharynx. They extend
posteriorly to about level with the male genital pore,
where they turn inwardly to open quite independently
of each other, into the seminal vesicle. There is no
indication of branches to the vasa deferentia extend-
ing posteriorly and uniting behind the vagina, as
found in other species of Notoplana. The seminal
vesicle is pyriform and possesses a well-developed
musculature of circular fibres. Its narrow end is
directed anteriorly. The globular prostatic organ lies
dorsally to the distal end of the seminal vesicle and
is thickly coated with circular and mainly longitudinal
muscle fibres, investing a tall glandular epithelium.
From the distal end of the seminal vesicle, a short
ejaculatory duct extends dorsally to penetrate some
way into the prostatic organ, the epithelium of which
envelops the duct and contains five elongate com-
partments lying parallel with the duct. The compart-
ments and the duct open together into a small cham-
ber in the distal part of the prostatic organ. From the
latter, the ejaculatory duct leads into a relatively long
slender penis-papilla coated with a cuticle and may
be regarded as a stylet, which projects into the male
antrum through a long convoluted penis-pocket with
no sign of a penis-sheath. The penis-pocket is lined
with a ciliated epithelium coated with a thin mus-
culature invested by a thickened parenchyma. The
male antrum is deep and narrow, and lined with an
epithelium continuous with that of the ventral wall
of the body.
The female genital pore leads into a narrow and
shallow antrum femininum or vagina externa, which
extends dorsally to open into the vagina media. The
inner two-thirds of the vagina media is surrounded by
numerous “shell”-glands and functions as a “shell”-
chamber. This chamber extends to the dorsal wall of
the body, where it turns posteriorly to open into the
vagina interna. This region of the vagina continues
posteriorly to open into a bulbous Lang’s vesicle.
Shortly before opening into Lang’s vesicle, the vagina
receives the common duct of the two uterine canals.
Anteriorly, the uterine canals are confluent in front
of the pharynx. The vagina is coated with a muscu-
lature of longitudinal and circular fibres and lined
with a ciliated epithelium, whereas Lang’s vesicle is
lined with a shallow glandular epithelium.
Remarks: Many species have been assigned to the
genus Notoplana Laidlaw and about 10 of these have,
like the present form, no tentacles, a relatively large
Lang’s vesicle. and a long penis-pocket enclosing a
long slender penial stylet. N. longicrumena differs
370
REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (16): 361-384
May, 1982
FIG. 4. Notoplana longicrumena. A. Dorsal view. B. Arrangement of eyes (bar-scale=0.5 mm.) C. Sagittal section of copulatory
complexes. af., antrum femininum; am., antrum masculinum, Lyv., Lang’s vesicle; po., prostatic organ; pp., penis-pocket; s., stylet;
sc., “shell”-chamber; st., stalk of Lang’s vesicle; sv., seminal vesicle; uc., common uterine canal.
principally in the comparatively long penis-pocket,
which measures about the combined length of the
seminal vesicle and prostatic organ, whereas in other
species the length of the penis-pocket is only as long
as one or other of these organs. Of the species of
Notoplana possessing a long slender penis-papilla cov-
ered with a thin cuticle and lying in a long penis-
pocket, the present form closely resembles N. sawayai
Marcus, 1947, from Brazil and N. parvula Palombi,
1924, from Indonesia. Both of these latter forms,
however, possess a vagina bulbosa, which is absent in
N. longicrumena. This species also closely resembles
the foregoing N. distincta. It differs, however, in the
arrangement of the eyes, in the position of the mouth
and pharynx, in the relative length of the penial stylet
and in one or two other less important features.
Tripylocelis typica Haswell, 1907
(Fig. 5)
Locality: South Australia—a mature and an imma-
ture specimen (SAM/V2667), Wittelbee Point, West
Coast, W. Zeidler, 2.i11.75.
Morphology: The mature specimen is elongate oval
and measures 12 mm long by 5 mm wide. Dorsally,
the body is light brown, ramified with a darker col-
ouration, due to the dark green lining of the gut
branches, but in the immature specimen the greenish
ramification is apparent only in the pharyngeal region.
The ventral surface is of a lighter colour.
A pair of nuchal tentacles occurs at about 1.5 mm
from the anterior extremity of the body. About 15
eyes lie on one tentacle and about 19 in the other.
The cerebral organ lies in the median line, between
the tentacles, and around it cerebral eyes are arranged
in two groups.
The mouth is situated in the middle region of the
body. The pharynx is about 4 mm long and lies in
the middle third of the body. It possesses 9 to 10
pairs of lateral folds. The intestinal trunk is about as
long as the pharynx and has 9 or 10 pairs of lateral
limbs, which branch towards the margins of the body
and do not anastomose. The trunk bifurcates anteriorly
and posteriorly.
The male pore is situated at 3.5 mm from the
posterior margin of the body, and the female pore
about 1 mm behind the male. As is usual among
polyclads, the testes and ovaries are disposed ventrally
and dorsally, respectively. The vasa deferentia appear
POLYCLAD TURBELLARIANS FROM THE SOUTHERN COASTS OF AUST. 371
on either side of the pharynx in the region of the
mouth and proceed posteriorly in the ventral paren-
chyma to a little beyond the level of the hinder end
of the pharynx, where they turn inwardly to meet in
the median line and lead into a short convoluted
ejaculatory duct, directed anteriorly. The duct opens
into the inner end of a small, dorso-ventrally elongate,
seminal vesicle, differentiated from the ejaculatory
duct by a somewhat thicker musculature. The dorsal
end of the seminal vesicle narrows and bends pos-
teriorly as the ejaculatory duct is thrown into several
coils. This latter portion of the ejaculatory duct is
lined with a relatively tall ciliated epithelium and has
a very narrow lumen. Finally, the duct enters a well-
developed unarmed penis-papilla containing numerous
gland-cells, and, as noted by Haswell (1907), this
Suggested that the distal region of the ejaculatory
duct might have a prostatic function. The penis-papilla
appears as an evagination of the inner end of the
long, convoluted, posteriorly directed antrum mas-
culinum, for its epithelial covering is similar to the
lining of the male antrum. This epithilium is highly
glandular and bears very long cilia. Almost throughout
its length, the lumen of the male antrum holds accu-
mulations of an eosinophilous granular material, an
indication that the gland cells of the epithelial lining
possibly produce a prostatic substance.
The female pore leads into a short narrow antrum
femininum, directed dorsally. The antrum opens into
a narrow vagina media extending anteriorly to near
the male antrum, where it loops dorsally and runs
posteriorly to a region above the female antrum. In
this region the vagina turns ventrally to receive the
common duct of the 2 uterine canals. The vagina
media represents that portion of the vagina extending
from the female antrum to near the entrance of the
common uterine duct. This portion has plicate walls
lined with a ciliated epithelium, and into its lumen
open the ducts of innumerable extracapsular “‘shell’’-
glands investing its entire length, and for this reason
the vagina media may be regarded as a long narrow
“shell”-chamber. From the latter, the vagina interna,
lined with well-developed ciliated cells, continues to
the point where it turns ventrally. At this point, after
receiving the common uterine canal, the vagina interna
gives rise to a ductus vaginalis which extends ventrally
to open into the ectal region of the female antrum.
The ductus vaginalis is lined with a tall ciliated epi-
thelium, similar to that lining the vagina externa and
the uterine canals. On leaving the vagina interna, the
uterine canals run alongside the pharynx to near its
anterior extremity, where their ends remain separated.
From its union with the vagina interna, the lumen of
the ductus vaginalis gradually narrows, presumably
contracting to prevent the flow of eggs not covered
with “shell” material, but used for the expulsion of
excess reproductive materials and as a copulatory
organ, corresponding to Laurer’s canal in trematodes
and the vagina in cestodes, as suggested by Haswell,
Remarks: The mature specimen described above
agrees very well with Tripylocelis typica as described
by Haswell (1907) from N.S.W., but differs principally
in one feature, for the ductus vaginalis opens into the
antrum femininum and not independently on the ven-
tral surface of the body, as Haswell states. This
difference is here not regarded as diagnostically
important and the present specimen is determined as
Tripylocelis typica Haswell, 1907. On the other hand,
if it were found that the difference in the position of
the opening of the ductus vaginalis was constant in
specimens from South Australia and N.S.W., then
this feature could be regarded as one of systematic
interest. Moreover, there are differences in the struc-
ture of the male copulatory complex, but these are
probably no more than varying stages of development.
CANDIMBOIDES gen.nov
Diagnosis: Leptoplanidae. Body elongate, without
tentacles. Eyes in two elongate clusters in region of
cerebral organ. Pharynx in middle third of body. Male
and female genital pores approximate and well sep-
arated from posterior margin of body. Male copulatory
complex immediately posterior to pharynx. Vasa
deferentia unite to form common duct opening into
muscular seminal vesicle. Prostatic organ muscular
and lined with tall, smooth, glandular epithelium.
Penis-stylet lying in penis-pocket. Female copulatory
complex includes bursa copulatrix and Lang’s vesicle.
Type-species: C. rabita (du B. R. Marcus & Marcus,
1968) comb.nov.
Other species: C. cuneiformis sp.nov.
Remarks: Two specimens of this genus are available.
Although their copulatory complexes are not yet fully
developed and the gonads are not yet ready to begin
their reproductive processes, it is possible to recognise
that they are closely related morphologically to Can-
dimba rabita du B. R. Marcus and Marcus 1968
from the Caribbean island of Curacao. However, the
two forms differ from one another in several features,
principally in the structure of the copulatory bursa
and in the relative positions of the seminal vesicle
and the prostatic organ. When du B. R. Marcus and
Marcus (1968) considered the species C. rabita to be
congeneric with the type-species of Candimba
(C. divae Marcus, 1949, from Brazil), they regarded
the absence of a bursa copulatrix in the latter to be
of no generic importance. There are however, other
important features by which the two forms may be
differentiated. In C. divae the pharynx lies in the
anterior third of the body, the genital pores are widely
separated, a penis-stylet and a penis-pocket are absent,
whereas in C. rabita the pharynx lies in the middle
third of the body, the genital pores are close to each
other, a penis-stylet and a penis-pocket are present.
372
ra)
o
© £0 *
% ©
o 8 3
obo” of
any 4
Q 50 :
ie) oy
ley .
ie) Mee
0
S96 (e)
REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (16): 361-384
June, 1982
« fe)
oO
5
sv
uc
dv
af sc
FIG. 5. Tripylocelis typica. A. Arrangement of eyes. B. Sagittal section of copulatory complexes. af., antrum femininum; am., antrum
masculinum; dv., ductus vaginalis; e., ejaculatory duct; p., penis-papilla; sc., “shell”-chamber; sv., seminal vesticle; uc., common
uterine canal.
C. cuneiformis agrees with C. rabita in all of these
features, and they are both dissimilar from Candimba
divae, which is the reason for establishing Candim-
boides.
Candimboides cuneiformis sp.nov.
(Fig. 6)
Localities: Victoria—holotype (NMV/G3294),
sample M7/1-3, Westernport Bay Environmental
Study, Jan., 1974; paratype (BM/1980-5.1.15),
sample 32N, Crib Point Benthic Survey, Aug. 1966.
Morphology: The specimen from Westernport Bay
is rather distorted and slightly macerated, and that
from Crib Point is also in poor histological condition,
but apparently both have a somewhat cuneiform out-
line, rounded anteriorly and tapering posteriorly, and
measure about 6.5 mm long and about 2.5 mm wide.
Dorsally, the body is brownish, speckled with dark
spots, due to underlying ovaries, which are widely
scattered, leaving only the marginal regions free.
The cerebral organ is situated at 1 mm from the
anterior margin of the body and bounded by an elon-
gate cluster of eyes on either side. The clusters are
short and tend to converge anteriorly. In the specimen
from Crib Point there are about 40 eyes in each
cluster, whereas in the younger worm from Western-
port Bay there are only about 20 eyes in each cluster.
The mouth is situated at about 3 mm from the
anterior margin of the body and opens into the middle
region of the pharyngeal chamber, which is about
1.5 mm long and contains a short pharynx provided
with six pairs of lateral folds. Details of the intestinal
POLYCLAD TURBELLARIANS FROM THE SOUTHERN COASTS OF AUST, 373
system have not been made out, but the posterior gut
branches of the younger specimen appear to be
infested with many gregarines.
The hinder half of the specimen from Crib Point
has been serially sectioned, and in this specimen the
male genital pore is situated at 2.5 mm from the
hinder margin of the body, and the female genital
pore at 0.3 mm posteriorly to the male pore.
As is usual in polyclads, the testes lie in the ventral
parenchyma and the ovaries in the dorsal, with a
tendency for the ovaries to move ventrally and mingle
with the testes. It has been difficult to make out the
vasa deferentia, but they appear to arise in the pha-
ryngeal region and run posteriorly to about the level
of the male pore, where they turn inwardly to unite
in the median line and form a short anteriorly
directed ejaculatory duct. This duct opens into the
posterior end of an oval seminal vesicle lying close to
the dorsal wall of the body and directed obliquely
ventrally. The vesicle is very muscular, its wall con-
sisting of a relatively thick layer of longitudinal and
circular fibres. Presumably, the male copulatory com-
plex is not yet fully functional, because the seminal
vesicle contains no sperm, but an eosinophilous mat-
erial similar to that found in the prostatic organ and
had probably been forced into the vesicle by contrac-
tion of the body at fixation. The anterior end of the
seminal vesicle narrows to open into an ejaculatory
duct, which curves posteriorly and ventrally to open
into the anterior end of the prostatic organ through
a shallow papilla. The prostatic organ is oval and lies
ventrally to the seminal vesicle, which is of similar
size. It is invested with a thick layer of mainly longi-
tudinal muscles, but the portion of the ejaculatory
duct passing through the wall of the prostrate is
enveloped by a layer of circular muscles, probably
functioning as a sphincter. The prostatic organ is
lined with a tall, vacuolate, glandular epithelium
which produces a granular material. The posterior
end of the prostatic organ opens directly into a long
slender penis-papilla, the distal two-thirds of which,
about 0.35 mm long, is covered with a thick cuticle
and may be regarded as a penis-stylet. This stylet
appears to be slightly flattened dorso-ventrally to
produce an unusual shape, as illustrated (Fig. 6B). It
lies in a penis-pocket that opens into a narrow male
antrum through a shallow penis-sheath.
The ovaries are widely distributed, extending from
level with the eyes to the posterior region of the body.
The female pore leads into a narrow antrum. Through
the anterior wall of the antrum, near its external
aperture, opens a relatively large bursa copulatrix.
This bursa is directed dorsally and lies to one side of
the median line. The efferent canal of the bursa is
exceedingly narrow and invested with compact par-
enchymatous tissue. Dorsally, it opens into a swollen
muscular structure lying above the male pore. In the
present specimen there appears to be little or no
lumen to the bursa, until it opens into its bulbous
portion, which is provided with a thick muscular wall
and lined with a tall ciliated epithelium. From the
opening of the bursa copulatrix into the antrum fem-
ininum, the vagina extends to near the dorsal wall of
the body, where it turns posteriorly and curves ven-
trally to receive the common duct of the uterine
canals. From this union, the vagina continues ventrally
to open into a small globular Lang’s vesicle. “Shell’’-
glands are not yet developed, hence a “‘shell”-chamber
is not yet apparent.
Family HOPLOPLANIDAE Stummer-Traunfels,
1933
Hoploplana rosea Prudhoe, 1977
Localities: Victoria—one specimen (NMV/G3293),
sample 23S/5, Crib Point Benthic Survey, 1965; one
specimen (BM/1980.5.1.21), sample W/1, Western-
port Bay Environmental Study, 29.xi.73.
Morphology. The two specimens are discoid and
have a diameter of 5-6 mm. The colour of the papillate
dorsal surface of the specimen from Crib Point is
brownish, instead of pinkish as in the type-specimen
of the species from South Australia, while the spec-
imen from Westernport Bay is greyish after preser-
vation in alcohol. The morphology of both specimens
appears to be identical with that of the type-specimen.
Family PLANOCERIDAE Stimpson, 1857
Planocera edmondsi Prudhoe, 1982
(Figs. 7 and &)
Localities: South Australia—holotype (SAM/
V2668), under rocks, upper tidal zone, Port Noarlunga,
St Vincent Gulf, S. J. Edmonds, Nov., 1950.
Tasmania—2 paratypes (BM/1980.5.1.13-14), on
Sonderophycus in 30 metres, Little Squally Cove,
Deal Island, Bass Strait, S.A. Shepherd, 4.v.74.
Morphology: Strongly leaf-like and rounded oval
in outline. The holotype measures 27 mm by 19.0
mm. Dorsal surface of the living worm reddish or
reddish brown. Preserved specimens still retain patches
of such pigment, particularly on tentacles. On the
dorsal surface, there is a pair of conspicuous, non-
retractile, nuchal tentacles lying 1.5 mm apart and
situated at about the junction of the first and second
thirds of the total length of the body. Between the
tentacles lies the cerebral organ. At the base of each
tentacle there is a ring of 40 or 50 tentacular eyes,
and around the cerebral organ numerous cerebral
eyes are scattered. The cerebral eyes show indistinctly
a division into two lateral clusters, commonly found
among species of the genus Planocera Blainville, and
each cluster showing some indication of a division
374 REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (16): 361-384
are wo
Stet gi*
oe ee
be FO, ?
° 4 .
. *; we
ov» ' 8
a o j *
4 F ,
a a ae ee iM.
a pte st
bd »
iJ
a
°
e *
po
June, 1982
am
af Lv
FIG 6. Candimboides cuneiformis. A. Arrangement of eyes; B. Penis-stylet (bar-scale=0.1 mm.) (ventral view). C. Sagittal section of
copulatory complexes. af., antrum femininum; am., antrum masculinum; bc., bursa copulatrix; e., ejaculatory duct; Lv., Lang’s
vesicle; po., prostatic organ; s., stylet; sv. seminal vesicle; uc., common uterine canal; vm., vagina media.
into an anterior and a posterior group in relation to
the cerebral organ (Fig. 7B).
The mouth occurs in the middle region of the body,
and in the largest specimen at about 5 mm behind
the cerebral organ. It opens into a pharyngeal cham-
ber, about 5 mm long, containing a well-developed
pharynx possessing four pairs of deep lateral folds.
The intestinal trunk is about as long as the pharyngeal
chamber and has six or seven pairs of deep lateral
branches and a forwardly-directed branch passing
over the cerebral organ. The dendriform offshoots of
the intestinal branches do not anastomose.
The male pore is situated at 3.5-4 mm posteriorly
to the mouth, and the female pore 2.0-.25 mm behind
the male. The male copulatory complex lies close
behind the pharynx and is directed anteriorly from
its ventral aperture. The testes are widely distributed,
ventrally to the intestinal branches. The vasa defer-
entia arise on either side of the female copulatory
complex, close to the ventral wall of the body, and
take a convoluted course anteriorly to near a level
with the hinder end of the pharynx, where they turn
medially to open together into a seminal vesicle. The
latter appears to be a structure of two compartments,
one being vesicular and the other wholely muscular.
The union of the vasa deferentia gives rise to a narrow
ejaculatory duct which passes through the muscular
compartment of the seminal vesicle to open into the
vesicular compartment containing a mass of sperm.
From the sperm-containing section, a narrow duct
passes through the muscular section, skirting the pos-
POLYCLAD TURBELLARIANS FROM THE SOUTHERN COASTS OF AUST.
375
uh
ely
Wee ues
i
un
nM
|
FIG 7. Planocera edmondsi. A. Dorsal view. B. Arrangement of eyes (bar-scale = 1 mm.) C. Copulatory complexes, with their respective
apertures (ventral view).
terior and ventral walls of the prostatic organ, through
a pocket surrounding the proximal region of the cirrus
cavity, to unite with the prostatic duct. The prostatic
organ is a globular structure lying antero-dorsally to
the seminal vesicle. As in other species of Planocera,
the prostatic organ is lined with a very tall, much-
folded, glandular epithelium. The prostatic duct
springs from the posterior wall of the prostatic organ
and soon opens into the ejaculatory duct, which enters
the anterior end of the cirrus-sac or intromittent organ
through a broad projection that is probably no more
than a slight eversion of the inner or proximal end of
the cirrus-sac, since it is covered with spines. The
cirrus-sac has a narrow lumen and is lined with strong
spines that gradually increase in size towards the
outer or distal end. Around the opening of the cirrus-
sac, as it opens into a very shallow male antrum,
there are five very large spines or teeth. The cirrus-
sac and the prostatic organ are invested with a thick
muscular sheath, in which there is a cavity around
the proximal half of the cirrus-sac and the ejaculatory
duct.
The ovaries are numerous and distributed widely
in the dorsal parenchyma. The female genital pore
opens directly into a large bursa copulatrix provided
with an exceedingly thick musculature of circular,
longitudinal and radial fibres. The bursa appears to
contain three indistinct sections. The distal and prox-
imal sections are lined with a ciliated epithelium,
whereas the central section is lined with a cuticle
thrown into longitudinal ridges. The bursa is directed
anteriorly and leads into a wide vagina media, much
of which functions as a “shell” chamber, being
invested with innumerable “shell” glands. From the
bursa, the vagina media makes a wide posteriorly
directed curve to receive the common uterine canal.
From this union, the vagina continued posteriorly as
a narrow rudimentary Lang’s vesicle.
Remarks: This species is named after Dr S. J.
Edmonds, formerly of the University of Adelaide,
and is readily differentiated from all known species
of the genus Planocera by the unusual structure of
the seminal vesicle and by the presence of five thorn-
like spines embedded in the wall around the opening
of the cirrus-sac.
Family GNESIOCEROTIDAE du Bois-Reymond
Marcus and Marcus, 1966, emend.
Gnesiocerinae du Bois—Reymond Marcus and Mar-
cus, 1966
Diagnosis: Planoceroidea with elongate-oval body.
Eyes in two elongate clusters alongside cerebral organ,
or in paired cerebral and tentacular clusters. Pharynx
376
REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (16): 361-384
June, 1982
ii ANS
\\S
\\
i)
WN
aN
sv vd é
uc
/
AY
4
.
cs
Pie alee,
ds (50
r heey y
- ae ‘Os
pene ' Sy
~ BSS
P sf Bs
Jip. nw rt ey [
ee Mee .
17 ti Sy
ice 2 d¢
C2 A Z pe & i
Lo aN a i 7B rs ‘ Win
ee De =
OF tune } Le Sat Lent ;
TAA Q Sg ORSe gt wy
. ce C¢
sc
be
af
FIG, 8. Planocera edmondsi. A. Male copulatory complex. am., antrum masculinum; cs., Cirrus-sac; ct., cirrus-teeth; e., ejaculatory
duct; po., prostatic organ; sv., seminal vesicle; vd., vas deferens; B. female copulatory complex. af., antrum femininum; bc., bursa
copulatrix; Lv., Lang’s vesicle; sc., “‘shell”-chamber; uc., common uterine canal.
much folded, situated in middle region of body, or
somewhat anteriorly. Genital pores separate. Vasa
deferentia may form pair of accessory seminal vesicles
or open into true seminal vesicle. Prostatic organ well
developed, interpolated between sperm reservoir and
cirrus sac. Epithelium of prostatic organ tall and
thrown into folds, distal or ectal region of prostatic
organ narrows to open into cirrus-sac invested with
thick musculature. Cirrus-sac contains well-developed
cuticularized papilla or lined with thick cuticle, often
covered with stiff bristles or spines. Vagina simple,
but may possess vagina bulbosa and Lang’s vesicle.
Remarks; The known genera constituting this family
are listed by du Bois—Reymond Marcus and Marcus
(1968) under the subfamily “Gnesiocerinae”. They
divided the Planoceridae into two subfamilies: the
Planocerinae and the Gnesiocerinae; based on the
presence of an interpolated prostatic organ or of an
independent or so-called “free” prostatic organ. The
Gnesiocerinae is characterised by an interpolated
prostatic organ, through which sperm passes during
copulation, and the Planocerinae by an independent
prostatic organ. The position of this organ in relation
to the ejaculatory duct is of family importance among
POLYCLAD TURBELLARIANS FROM TILE SGUTUERN COASTS UF AUS]
acotylean polyclads and differentiates the family Lep-
toplanidae from the Callioplanidae, and the Stylo-
chidae Irom the Cryptocelididae. Therefore, ta be
consistent in classifying acotylean polyclads, il seems
necessary to raise the subfamily Gnesiocerotinge
(emended) to family rank.
ECHINGPLANA Haswell, 1907
Diagnosis; Gnesiocerotidae without tentacles. Eyes
disposed in two elongate groups, Pharynx mainly in
anterior half of body, provided with 10-15 pairs of
shallow lateral folds: intestinal branches ramify and
anastomose. Male and female genital pores well sep-
arated by genital sucker with corrugated surlace.
Seminal vesicle elongate. Prostatic organ muscular
and clongate, united with cirrus-sae by convoluted
ejaculatory duct enclosed in mass of muscle fibres,
Cirrus-sac with thick musculature and lined with
spines gradually increasing in size towards the
exterior, No male antrum. Vagina narrow, directed
anteriorly, invested with “shell’-glands over much of
its length, Lang’s. vesicle rudimentary, Uterine canals
confluent in median line anteriorly to pharynx.
Type-species: E, tenerrinia Haswell, 1907,
Type-locality; Port Jackson, N.S.W., Australia.
Remarks: Although Echinoplana has been defined
by Haswell (1907), by Bock (1913) and by Gualleni
(1978), for one reason or another it was necessary to
redefine it, Haswell regarded Eehinoplana asa tnem-
ber of the Leptoplanidae, but Bock (1913) placed it
in an appendix of the Planoceridae, and it has sub-
sequently been generally accepted as a member of
the latter family. En fact, Bresslau (1928) placed iL
in the subfamily Planocerinae, but du Bois—Reymond
Marcus and Marcus (1968) referred it to a new
planocerid subfamily Gnesiacerimae (sic).
Echinoplana tenervima Haswell, 1907
Locality: South Australia—l specimen (SAM/
¥2623), Point Hrown, W. Zeidler, 9 viii.74:
| specimen (SAM/V2624), west coast of Wittelbee
Point. W. Zeidler, 2.11.75; | specimen (SAM/V2622),
under rocks, intertidal zone, Pondalowie Bay,
W. Zeidler, 7.x1.76; 1 specimen (SAM/V2621), under
rocks, low tide, Daly Heads, Yorke Peninsula,
W. Zeidler, 9.xi.76-
Morphology; The elongate-oval body in the present
material measures 12-22 mm long and 5-9 mm wide.
and of a very light brown, with a dark reticulation.
No nuchal tentacles. Eyes are arranged in two elongate
groups, disposed laterally to the cerebral organ, each
consisting of 30-50 cyes and tending to converge
anteriorly. The tentacular eyes are situated in the
Posterior region of each group and are larger and
appear nearer to the dorsal surface than the remaining
7
(cerebral) eyes. The cerebral organ lies. between the
pharynx and the anterior margin of the body, bul
rather nearer to the pharynx, In fact, the arrangement
af the eyes in relation to the cerebral organ agrees
well with that depicted by Haswell (1907) and Gallen
(1978),
The pharynx is situated in the secand quarter of
the total length of the body from the anterior margin,
itis 3-5 mm long and possesses 10-14 pairs of shallow
lateral folds, The intestinal trunk is about as long as
the pharynx and gives off some 14-16 pairs of lateral
branches, which ramity and anastomose towards the
periphery of the body. The anterior end of the intes-
tinal trunk trifurcates, a central branch passing anter-
iorly over the cerebral organ and the outer branches
passing forwardly round the cerebral organ,
The male and female pores are well separated and
situated in the third quarter of the body. Between
them lics 4 corrugated area, probably functioning as
a genita] sucker, It is covered by a tall glandular
epithelium supported by a thickening of the muscu-
lature of the body wall,
The yasa deferentia appear on either side of the
anterior region of the pharynx, with which ihey run
parallel. Immediately posterior to ihe pharynx, ihey
converge towards the median line to open together
into the posterior end of an elongate seminal vesicle,
provided with a thin muscular wall, This vesicle lies
ventrally, is directed anteriorly, and terminates in a
narrow ejaculatory duct, The latter leads into the
anterior end of the prostatic organ through a distinet
papilla projecting into the lumen of the organ, The
latter 1s elongate and two or three times larger than
the seminal vesicle, dorsally to which it lies. [1 is
provided with a thick inner layer of circular muscle
fibres and an outer layer of longitudinal fibres and is
lined with a tall glandular epithelium thrown into
radial folds. The prostatic organ is directed pos-
teriorly, and its hinder end narraws to continue as a
much-convoluted gjaculatory duet invested with a
thick layer of muscle fibres. The ejaculatory duct
Opens into a long cirrus-sac having a narrow lumen
and lined with cuticular spines that gradually become
larger towards the exterior. The cirrus-sac is coated
with a very thick wall of radial muscles, among which
circular and longitudinal museles are scattered. There
is no antrum masculinum, becwuse the cirrus-sac Opens
directly to the exterior. The male pore or exterior
opening of Lhe cirrus-sav js situated at 6-10 ain from
the posterior end of the body.
The female genital pore lies at 2-3 mm posteriorly
to the male pore and opens into a narrow vagina
externa or antrum femininum, lined with a glandular
epithelium similar to that of the corrugated pad. The
vagina extends dorsally, but soon curves anteriorly
and immediately receives efferent duets of the invest-
378
ing ‘“‘shell”-glands to form a narrow “shell”-chamber.
From this chamber, the vagina continues anteriorly
as the vagina interna, lined with a low ciliated epi-
thelium, to near the muscular mass of the cirrus-sac,
dorsally to the male opening, where it makes a short
posteriorly-directed dorsal loop. Shortly before ter-
minating, the vagina receives a short common uterine
canal, thus leaving a very short prolongation, men-
tioned by Haswell (1907) in his generic definition, as
an “unsymmetrical diverticulum”, but apparently
comparable with the rudimentary Lang’s vesicle
found in some other polyclads. This very short narrow
vesicle is lined with a tall ciliated epithelium, similar
to that lining the uterine canals. Immediately before
and after receiving the common uterine canal, the
vagina is invested with innumerable eosinophilous
gland-cells opening into the vagina and producing a
secretion similar to that of the ‘‘shell”-glands—this
is an unusual feature among polyclads, but it is known
in the planocerid genus Disparoplana Laidlaw. From
their common entrance into the vagina, the paired
uterine canals extend anteriorly alongside the pharynx
and vasa deferentia to a level between the cerebral
organ and the pharynx, where they are confluent in
the median line. The entire vaginal system is enclosed
in a dense parenchyma packed with numerous muscle
fibres.
Remarks: In the main, the specimen described
above agrees with the description of this species given
by Haswell (1907) and exceedingly well with the
worm depicted by Galleni (1978). There are, however,
one or two differences, for Haswell found the epi-
thelium of the prostatic organ to be thrown into
longitudinal folds, whereas this epithelium in the pres-
ent specimen appears to be thrown into radial folds,
and one of his figures (2) suggests that a branch of
each vas deferens extends posteriorly beyond the male
copulatory complex. Moreover, Haswell speaks of an
“ootype”, but this appears to be that which is gen-
erally referred to by authors on polyclads as the
“shell” chamber.
In two serially sectioned specimens examined by
Haswell, there was evidence of hypodermic injection
of spermatozoa by other individuals through the
epidermis in the region of the corrugated area or
genital sucker, but in the present serially sectioned
specimen no such evidence has been found.
Along the Australian coasts, Echinoplana tener-
rima was known hitherto only from Port Jackson,
N.S.W., where it appears to have been common more
than seventy years ago. Recently, Galleni (1978) has
described and figured specimens of this species from
the Tuscan coast of Italy. Now that £. tenerrima
appears to be widely distributed along the coast of
South Australia, it seems reasonable to assume that
the occurrence of this species in the warm-temperate
waters of the Mediterranean is due to its being trans-
REC. S. AUST, MUS,, 18 (16): 361-384
June, 1982
ported in a manner similar to that mentioned above
for the North American polyclad Euplana gracilis.
Family CESTOPLANIDAE Lang, 1884
Cestoplana meridionalis Prudhoe, 1982
(Fig. 9)
Locality: South Australia—holotype (SAM/V2613-
V2620 consisting of uncut portions and serial sections)
and = paratype (BM/1980.5.1.7), Beachport,
W. Zeidler, 9.11.77.
Morphology: The slender holotype measures 20 mm
long and 3 mm wide at the broadest region near the
posterior end of the body. It has more or less parallel
sides and tapers towards both extremities. The ground
colour of both dorsal and ventral surfaces in the
preserved condition is greyish, but there is a tendency
for the body to appear brownish, due to granules of
chocolate-brown pigment in the epithelium, which
when sloughed off the brownish colouration is lost.
There is no indication of a ventral sucker or adhesive
depression in the posterior region of the body. The
bilobed cerebral organ lies at 1.25 mm from the ante-
rior end of the body. Eyes appear in the median area
of the body, at a short distance posteriorly to the
cerebral organ and spread fanwise over the anterior
region to the submarginal zones (Fig. 9A).
The mouth is situated at about 2.6 mm from the
hinder end of the body and opens into the posterior
region of a short pharyngeal chamber, which contains
a slightly “ruffled” pharynx about 1 mm in length.
The intestinal trunk is long, reaching anteriorly from
behind the pharyngeal chamber to near the cerebral
organ. It possesses numerous pairs of lateral branches,
which ramify towards the margins of the body, but
do not anastomose.
The male genital pore is situated at about 0.65 mm
posterior to the mouth and 0.4mm anterior to the
female genital pore. The testes, unlike the ovaries, do
not appear to extend into the post-pharyngeal region
of the body. A pair of vasa deferentia lie on either
side of the pharyngeal chamber and take a convoluted
course posteriorly as far as the hinder level of the
female copulatory complex, where they loop inwardly
to run towards one another and near the male antrum
they unite to form a short ejaculatory duct. This duct
extends dorsally and soon opens into a muscular,
elongate-oval, seminal vesicle, which is directed anter-
iorly and disposed ventrally to the intestinal trunk in
the region between the genital pores. The anterior
end of the seminal vesicle narrows abruptly to form
a short duct, which leads into the proximal region of
the prostatic organ. The latter is a small somewhat
pyriform structure lined with a tall glandular epi-
thelium and invested with a thick musculature,
through which pass gland-cells opening into the lumen
of the prostatic organ. This organ opens directly into
POLYCLAD TURBELLARIANS FROM THE SOUTHERN COASTS OF AUST. 379
FIG. 9. Cestoplana meridionalis. A. Head-end of holotype (bar-scale-0.5 mm) B. Head-end of paratype (bar-scale-0.5 mm.) C. Sagittal
section of copulatory complexes of holotype. af., antrum femininum; am., antrum masculinum; po., prostatic organ; ps., penis-sheath;
5., stylet; sc., “‘shell”-chamber; sv., seminal vesicle; vi., vagina interna.
380
a small conical penis-papilla, tipped with a short spike
of scleroid material. The armed penis-papilla is dis-
posed vertically in a spacious penis-pocket which leads
into the male antrum through a distinct penis-sheath,
The male antrum is short, bulbous or somewhat pyr-
iform.
The ovaries form a broad chain on either side of
the median line and extend posteriorly from the
cephalic region to near the hinder end of the body.
The female genital opening is situated at about
1.5mm from the posterior margin of the body. It
opens into a narrow antrum femininum or vagina
externa, which leads into a wide, dorso-ventrally com-
pressed, “‘shell”-chamber. It seems that the efferent
ducts of the ‘‘shell”-glands open into the chamber
only through its dorsal wall and into a short portion
of the distal region of the vagina interna. From the
“shell”-chamber, the vagina interna, lined with a cil-
iated epithelium, makes a short posterior and down-
ward curve to receive the uterine canals at its inner
end. The uterine canals extend anteriorly from their
union with the vagina, but are not yet fully developed.
The paratype specimen is also slender, but a little
larger than the holotype, measuring 22 mm long and
3.5mm wide. Its coloration is also chocolate-brown
dorsally. The distribution of its eyes (Fig. 9B) is
different from that in the holotype, inasmuch as there
is a narrow median space, widening anteriorly, and
devoid of eyes, a feature often seen in specimens of
other species of Cestoplana. This apparent difference
in the two present specimens probably arose because
of a contraction of the cephalic region of the holotype
at fixation. Although neither set of gonads has
reached maturity, the male and female copulatory
complexes are almost fully developed and are more
or less comparable with those in the holotype.
Remarks: The diagnostic features of Cestoplana
meridionalis are the chocolate-brown colouration of
the body, the lack of a ventral adhesive pad poste-
riorly, the union of the vasa deferentia to form a
common duct entering the seminal vesicle and the
armed penis-papilla. The combination of these fea-
tures enables this species to be readily differentiated
from hitherto described species of Cestoplana.
Haswell (1907) erected the species Cestoplana aus-
tralis for an immature polyclad found between the
tide-marks at Woollahra Point, Port Jackson, N.S.W.
Apparently it possesses a light ground colour, becom-
ing reddish orange posteriorly. In addition, close to
each lateral border there is a band of “vivid vermil-
ion” and a median band of similar colour along the
length of the body. Haswell recognized the very close
resemblance of this species with the European Ces-
toplana rubrocincta (Grube, 1840,) and Kato (1944)
has considered the two forms to be synonymous.
REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (16): 361-384
June, 1982
Family PSEUDOCEROTIDAE Lang, 1884 emend.
Poche, 1926
Pseudoceros reticulatus Yeri and Kaburaki, 1918
Localities: South Australia—Il specimen
(BM/1980.7.14), under stones, 5m deep, Tipara
Reef, 14km west from Port Hughes, S.A. Shepherd;
1 specimen (AM/W17748), 5m deep, Penneshaw,
Kangaroo Island, N. Coleman, 12.ii1.78.
Tasmania—several specimens (BM/1980.5.1.2-4
and AM/W17751), on reef, 5m deep, Georges Bay,
St Helens, N. Coleman, 6.10.77.
Morphology: The specimen from Tipara Reef is
somewhat discoid in outline, measuring about 25 mm
both long and wide, whereas the specimen from Kan-
garoo Island is oval in outline and measures 45 mm
long and 25mm wide. The several specimens from
Tasmania are mainly a little smaller and distorted,
but after some manipulation they were found to be
oval in outline, measuring 18 mm-30 mm long and
10 mm-15 mm wide. The body is rather delicate, and
the dorsal surface of the Tasmanian specimens is
dark grey, has thick reticulation of grey or reddish
brown, with much lighter interstices; ventrally the
body is lighter than the dorsal surface, with no retic-
ulation. In these specimens, the dorsal surface also
shows many dark grey pigment spots of varying size,
as well as numerous small dark spots, due to under-
lying ovaries. In fact, these specimens agree excep-
tionally well with the coloured figure of this species
given by Yeri and Kaburaki (1918). In one or two
specimens, there are indications of a whitish margin
to the body, frequently interrupted by dull grey
patches. A dark median band exists over the main-
gut and is dappled with whitish patches. In a koda-
chrome taken by Neville Coleman, the living animal
from Tasmania is translucent, brownish, with a dif-
fusion of white over most of the dorsal surface of the
body, interspersed with white spots. The white
patches in the median band and the interruptions to
the whitich marginal band observed in the preserved
material are quite apparent in the living worm.
The specimens from South Australia are somewhat
lighter in colour. They possess the dark median band,
similarly dappled, and their marginal zones show a
reticulation of grey, but the areas between the median
band and the marginal zones are of a light yellowish
brown. The dorsal surface is likewise spotted with
dark grey pigment, but ventrally the spots are absent.
The dark dots seen in the Tasmanian specimens are
less apparent here, for the yolk material in the ovaries
is much lighter in colour. In a kodachrome, also taken
by N. Coleman, the living animal from Kangaroo
Island appears translucent, brownish, with a greyish
reticulation covering the dorsal surface.
A pair of tentacles appear as mere folds of the
POLYCLAD TURBELLARIANS FROM THE SOUTHERN COASTS OF AUST. 381
anterior margin of the body and are tipped with
white. Each tentacle contains numerous eyes beneath
the dorsal and ventral surfaces, the number of which
increases, with the size of the body. The cerebral eyes
lie dorsally to the cerebral organ, and in the larger
specimens they form a compact rounded group,
whereas in the smaller specimens they appear to be
arranged more or less in two semicircles disposed one
behind the other.
The histological condition of the available material
is not good, nevertheless the subepithelial muscula-
ture of the Tasmania material appears to consist of
five layers of fibres, both dorsally and ventrally.
There is an outer and an inner layer of longitudinal
muscles and between them are two layers of muscles
forming a criss-cross pattern enclosing a central layer
of circular muscles.
The copulatory complexes are very similar in both
sets of specimens and agree well with those described
by Yeri and Kaburaki (1918). There is, however, one
feature of disagreement, for in the original specimens
the male copulatory complex lies closely posterior to
the pharynx, whereas in the specimens of both the
present sets the complex is situated ventrally to the
hinder region of the pharynx, a feature possibly due
to contraction at fixation.
Remarks: Pseudoceros reticulatus appears to be
common in the warm-temperate waters of the east
coast of Japan (Kato, 1944) and has been recorded
from the coast of Vietnam (Dawydoff, 1952). Its
occurrence in southern Australian waters indicates
that this species is either widely distributed in the
Indo-West Pacific region, or that it has been artifi-
cially transported by some means or other from the
northern area of this region to southern Australia.
Pseudoceros lividus sp.nov.
Locality: South Australia—holotype (AM/
W17750), on sponge, 5 m deep, Kingscote, Kangaroo
Island, N. Coleman, 13.iii.78.
Morphology: The holotype has been preserved in
formalin and is much contracted. It is oval in outline
and is 5 mm long and 3 mm wide. It does not appear
to be sexually mature. In a kodachrome taken by
N. Coleman, the living worm is bluish, dorsally and
ventrally, with a white margin. Because of the heavy
pigmentation, it has not been possible to make out
the arrangement of the eyes, even when an attempt
was made to clear the worm in methyl! salicylate. A
small ventral sucker is centrally situated in the
median line.
Remarks: Over 100 species of Pseudoceros have
been described, mainly from the Indo-Pacific region.
Hyman (1954) pointed out that the differentiation of
species in this genus has been based almost solely on
the pattern of coloration, although very little is known
of variation in this feature. Nevertheless, two or three
species have been described as showing much variety
in colour, but there are one or two instances of where
the pattern of coloration is remarkably constant.
Only two of the known species of Pseudoceros have
a bluish ground colour and these are P. concinnus
Stummer-Traunfels, 1933, nec (Collingwood, 1876)
Kaburaki, 1923, and P. tristriatus Hyman, 1959, In
both of these species, the dorsal surface is bluish with
a median and two submarginal bands of yellow, and
the present form being without any bands of colora-
tion is regarded as a new species.
Thysanozoon skottsbergi Bock, 1923
Locality: South Australia—l specimen (SAM/
V2666), Beachport, W. Zeidler, 9.ii.77; 1 specimen
(BM/1980.5.1.19), only “South Australia” known,
S. A. Shepherd.
Remarks: Both specimens are mature and closely
resemble those recorded by the present writer (1977)
from Gun Island and Fremantle, Western Australia.
Thysanozoon skottsbergi was originally recorded
from Masatierra Island, one of the Juan Fernandez
group, off the coast of Chile.
Family EURYLEPTIDAE Stimpson, 1857
Cycloporus australis Prudhoe, 1982
(Fig. 10)
Locality: South Australia—holotype (AM/
W177499) and paratype (BM 1980.5.1.22), American
River, Kangaroo Island, N. Coleman, 8.iii.78.
Morphology: The two specimens, preserved in for-
malin, are broadly oval in outline and measure 9-
10 mm long and 6,5-7 mm wide. Dorsally, they are
smooth and brownish, with widely-scattered dark spots,
due to underlying ovaries, and a lighter coloured
marginal band. In a kodachrome taken by
N. Coleman of the two specimens when alive, both
appear translucent and tinged with brown, with
whitish spots scattered over the dorsal surface and
yellowish patches distributed intermittently along the
margins of the body. Again, we have an instance of
where in the living animal the ovarian follicles are
seen through the dorsal epidermis of the body as
whitish dots, but when preserved in formalin the yolk-
material in each follicle becomes darkened and the
ovaries appear as dark spots. The ventral surface of
the body is of a uniform lighter colour, except where
the uterine canals filled with eggs appear as whitish
lines on either side of the median line. A muscular
ventral sucker lies in the middle region of the body.
The marginal tentacles, even when alive, according
to the kodachrome, are inclined to be indefinite, and
in the preserved condition they appear as slight folds
382 REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (16): 361-384
of the anterior margin of the body. Numerous eyes
occur in the tentacles, more especially ventrally, while
the numerous cerebral eyes lie over the cerebral organ
in two distinct rectangular clusters, about twice as
long as wide.
The dorsal epithelium of the body is taller than
the ventral epithelium and tightly packed with rhab-
dite cells, each of which contains several rhabdites.
The basement membrane is relatively thick, whereas
the subepithelial musculature appears to be rather
insignificant.
The mouth lies at about 1 mm from the anterior
margin of the body, close behind the cerebral organ,
and opens into a short pharyngeal chamber enclosing
a campanulate pharynx. From the pharyngeal cham-
ber, the median intestinal trunk extends to the pos-
terior region of the body, giving off 8 or 9 pairs of
lateral branches as it proceeds posteriorly. Anteriorly,
the intestinal trunk trifurcates, a central branch pass-
ing directly over the cerebral organ and a pair of
branches passing alongside the organ. The lateral
intestinal branches ramify and anastomose rather
loosely and terminate in numerous elongate vesicles
in the marginal regions of the body. The vesicles open
to the exterior through minute pores in the peripheral
epithelium. It seems likely that the yellowish patches
seen on the margins of the living animal are due to
undigested material lying in the terminal vesicles of
the digestive system.
The male genital pore is situated at 0.3 mm pos-
terior to the mouth and the female pore 1.3 mm
posterior to the male pore. The testes are widely
distributed ventrally to the intestinal branches and
reach to near the margins of the body. The vasa
deferentia arise on either side of the median line at
about midway between the female genital pore and
the ventral sucker. Proximally, they are narrow thin-
walled canals, but distally they are wide and lined
with a well-developed glandular epithelium, an unu-
sual feature in polyclads. On reaching anteriorly as
far as the hinder margin of the pharyngeal chamber,
they turn medially, narrow and, without uniting, open
separately into a seminal vesicle. This vesicle is bul-
bous, with a thick muscular wall, and lies ventral to
the hinder region of the pharyngeal chamber. From
June, 1982
the seminal vesicle, a short ejaculatory duct extends
anteriorly to open into a penis-papilla. The prostatic
organ is an elongate oval structure lying between the
pharyngeal chamber and the ejaculatory duct. It is
considerably larger than the seminal vesicle, and is
lined with a relatively tall glandular epithelium,
invested with a well-developed musculature. From its
anterior end, a short prostatic duct leads into the
ejaculatory duct as it opens into the penis-papilla.
This papilla is very small, but armed with a strong
stylet lying in a muscular penis-pocket, which opens
into a spacious antrum masculinum through a thick
conical penis-sheath.
The widely scattered ovaries lie dorsal to the intes-
tinal branches and extend to near the margins of the
body. They are larger than the testes. The female
copulatory complex presents the typical cotylean
structure which seldom undergoes modification. The
female genital pore opens into a widened antrum
femininum or vagina externa, lined with a densely
ciliated epithelium. The female antrum leads through
a narrow aperture in its dorsal wall into a swollen
dorsoventrally flattened “‘shell’”-chamber, into which
open the efferent ducts of innumerable investing
“shell’’-glands. From the “‘shell”-chamber, a muscular
vagina interna extends dorsally to receive the common
thin-walled uterine passage. A pair of symmetrically
disposed uterine canals extends anteriorly as far as
the male complex and then turns to run posteriorly
to a short distance beyond the vaginal complex. The
short uterine canals each bears 3 lateral uterine ves-
icles, suggesting that when the canals are fully devel-
oped and more elongate they may have about 9 pairs
of vesicles.
Remarks: According to a differential key to the
species of the genus Cycloporus Lang given by
du Bois-Reymond Marcus and Marcus (1968), the
present form bears a very strong resemblance to
C. gabriellae Marcus, 1950, from Brazil and the
Caribbean. Apart from a difference in coloration, the
greater number of eyes enables C. australis to be
readily differentiated from other species of the genus
so far described. In their key, Marcus and Marcus
did not include C. maculatus Hallez, 1893, which is
distinguished by the cerebral and tentacular eyes
merging to form an elongate cluster.
POLYCLAD TURBELLARIANS FROM THE SOUTHERN COASTS OF AUST. 383
gs” 9 SS
al Oo
S fo)
O00 Gen 0
Go Of nD 0°
0, 0008 OR
fog 090 6
°o o
0° 0? p80? 0°
000782 OO OUD O
© 8°30 P95 9%
Coe lO, o-°
OD 6 Soo Pe oboe
oO go inches
0,994 0° OG Ae 7 O
0 “ee ore 6
C00 Bao ia a
oo 4s fog
at SP 80 Oty “o
209 0 © One Og
oo. © a
see)
Ww RES
am % po Sv af sc
FIG. 10. Cycloporus australis. A. Arrangement of eyes. ph., pharynx (bar-scale-0.5 mm) B. Sagittal section of copulatory complexes.
af, antrum femininum; am., antrum masculinum; it., intestinal trunk; ph., pharynx; po., prostatic organ; s., stylet; sc., “‘shell’-
chamber; sv., seminal vesicle; v., vagina.
384 REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (16): 361-384
REFERENCES
BENNETT, I[., and POPE, E. C. 1960. Intertidal zonation of the
exposed rocky shores of Victoria, together with a rearrangement
of the biogeographical provinces of temperate Australian shores.
Aust.J.Mar.Freshwater Res. 4: 105-159.
BOCK, S. 1913. Studien uber Polycladen. Zool.Bidr.Uppsala 2:
4.
BOCK, S. 1923. Polycladen aus Juan Fernandez. Nat.Hist.Juan
Fernandez & Easter Is. 3 (Zool.): 341-372.
BOCK, S. 1925a. Papers from Dr. Th. Mortensen’s Pacific
Expedition 1914-1916. xxv. Planarians. Pt.i-iii.
Vidensk.Meddr.dansk.naturh.Foren. 79: 1-84.
BOCK, S. 1925b. Papers from Dr. Th. Mortensen’s Pacific Expe-
dition 1914-1916. xxvii. Planarians Pt.iv. New stylochids.
Vidensk.Meddr.dansk.naturh.Foren. 79: 97-184.
du BOIS-FREYMOND MARCUS, E. & MARCUS, E. 1968. Poly-
cladida from Curacao and faunistically related regions.
Stud.Fauna Curacao 26: 1-106.
GALLENI, L. 1978. Polycladi delle coste toscane. III. Echinoplana
celerrima Haswell, planoceride nuovo per il Mediterraneo et
note sul genere Echinoplana. Atti.Soc.tosc.Sci.nat. (B) 85.
10pp.
HASWELL, W. A. 1907. Observations on Australian polyclads.
Trans.Linn.Soc.Lond. (2) Zool. 9: 465-485.
HYMAN, L. H. 1939. Some polyclads of the New England coast,
especially of the Woods Hole Region. Biol.Bull.mar.biol.
Lab.Woods Hole 76: 127-152.
HYMAN, L. H. 1954. The polyclad genus Pseudoceros, with
special reference to the Indo-Pacific region. Pacific Sci. 8:
219-225.
HYMAN, L. H. 1959. Some Australian polyclads (Turbellaria).
Rec. Aust.Mus. 25: 1-17.
JACUBOWA, L. 1906. Polycladen von Neu-Britannien und Neu-
Caledonien. Jena Z. Naturw. 41: 113-158.
June, 1982
KATO, K. 1944. Polycladida of Japan. J.Sigenkag.Kenk. 1: 257-
318.
LAIDLAW, F. F. 1904. Notes on some polyclad Turbellaria in
the British Museum. Mem. & Proc.Manchr.lit.phil.Soc. 48:
Art.15: 1-6.
MARCUS, EE. 1949. Turbellaria brasileiros (7).
Bolm.Fac.Filos.Cienc.Univ.S.Paulo Zool.No.14: 7-155.
MARCUS, E. 1950. Turbellaria brasileiros (8). Bolm.Fac.Filos
Cienc.Univ.S.Paulo Zool.No.15: 5-191.
MARCUS, E. 1954. Reports of the Lund University Chile Expe-
dition 1948-1949. II. Turbellaria. Acta Univ.lund. N.F, 49:
no. 13: 1-115.
PLEHN, M. 1896. Neue Polycladen, gesammelt von Herrn Kapitan
Chierchia bei der Erdumschiffung der Korvette Vettor Pisani,
von Herrn Prof. Dr. Semon in Java. Jena Z.Naturw. 30: 137-
176.
PRUDHOE, S. 1977. Some polyclad turbellarians new to the fauna
of the Australian coasts. Rec.Aust.Mus. 31: 586-604.
PRUDHOE, S. 1982. Chapter 5, Polyclad flatworms (Phylum
Platyhelminthes): 220-227—In: S.A. Shepherd and I. M.
Thomas, ed., Marine Invertebrates of Southern Australia Part
I, Government Printer, South Australia.
SCHMARDA, L. K. 1859. Neue wirbellose Thiere beobachtet und
gesammelt auf einer Reise um die Erde 1853 bis 1857. Bd.l.
Halte 1.—Turbellaria, Rotatorien und Anneliden. xviii+66.
Leipzig.
STEAD, D. G. 1907. Preliminary note on the wafer (Leptoplana
australis), a species of dendrocoelous turbellarian worm,
destructive to oysters. Dept.Fish.N.S.W. 6 pp.
STUMMER-TRAUNFELS, R.von 1933. Polycladida [contd.]
Bronn’s K1.ordn.Tierreichs 4 Abt.1c; Lief. 179: 3485-3596.
YERI, M. and KABURAKI, T. 1918. Description of some Japanese
polyclad Turbellaria. J.Coll.Sci.imp.Univ.Tokyo 39 Art.9: 1-
54.
YERI, M. and KABURAKI, T. 1920. Notes on two new species
of Japanese polyclads. Annotnes zool.jap. 9: 591-598.
RECORDS oF THE
SOUTH AUSTRALIAN
MUSEUM
VOLUME 18 NUMBERS 17 —18 April, 1983
No. 17 HELMINTH TYPE SPECIMENS IN THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN
MUSEUM. I. NEMATODA
by LESLEY R. SMALES
No. 18 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF THE FROGS OF THE MAGELA CREEK
SYSTEM, NORTHERN TERRITORY
by MICHAEL J. TYLER, GRAEME A. CROOK AND MARGARET DAVIES
SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM
North Terrace, Adelaide
South Australia 5000
HELMINTH TYPE SPECIMENS IN THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM
I. NEMATODA
BY LESLEY R. SMALES
Summary
This is the first of an intended series of papers listing the helminth types held by the South
Australian Museum and the Australian Helminthological Collection.
HELMINTH TYPE SPECIMENS IN THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM.
I. NEMATODA
LESLEY R. SMALES
South Australian Museum, Adelaide, South Australia S000*
ABSTRACT
SMALES. LR 1983. Helminth type specimens in the South
Australian Museum, J. Nematoda. Ree 8. tat Wis. BS (17):
385-413. Type specimens of 412 species of Neniatodia, held
in the South Australian Muscum or the Australian Helmin-
tholvgival Collection are catalugued, Species are organized
into Superfamilies or Families and bated alphabetivally
according to the original name of the species. Where a name
change hus oecurred the most revent avecpiable name os
included,
INTRODUCTION
This is the first of an intended series of papers
listing the helminth types held by the South Australian
Museum and the Australian Helmintho-
logical Collection.
The Museum's. collection of helminths was estab-
lished soon after the arnval in 1921 of T, Harvey
Johnston to take up his appointment to the newly
created Chair of Zoology at the University of Adelaide,
He became an Honorary Curator of Helminthology
in the Museum in 1922, a position he held until his
death in 1951. As well as assuming an active role in
the governing of the Museum (Board of Governors,
1927-39; Honorary Director of the Museum, 1928-
31: Chairman of the Museum Board, 1940-51), he
began to augment the Museum collections almost
immediately. In addition he was co-author in a series
of papers on the taxonomy of Australian helminths,
the type material of which was eventually deposited
in the Museum.
The first helminth registrations were three trematode
holotypes in the Invertebrate "E” register in 1927 and
five more types were registered there in the 1930's.
A register for Vermes (“V") was started in 1935 and
23 helminth types. including cight transferred from
the “E” register, were recorded in 1937 and 1938.
Both registers then fell into disuse. Type material that
had been deposited in the Museum was loaned to P.
M. Thomas in 1951 and stored at the University for
ready access and safe keeping, No further helminth
matenal was registered until 1957 when 3 lots were
recorded in the “E"' register, There was a spasmodic
flow of material from 1963 on. However it was not
until 1974, following the removal of the marine inver-
tebrates collections to the Museum’s Goldsbrough
House annex. and the appointment of W. Zeidler as
Curator of Marine Invertebrates that any systematic
allempl was made to register the now considerable
collection of helminth types. He re-established the
“V"" register:
In 1977 responsibility for helmunihs was transferred
lo D.C. Lee, Curator of Arachnids. With the help of
his assistant, A. M. Edwards, the back-log material
was registered, in the “V" register. as well as material
returned from the University. The collection, previ-
ously stored as accession lois, was arranged to reflect
the systematic lramework of the group by using a
shelf number system prefixed by “HEL. Lee excluded
annelids from the register and transferred all other
registered helminths into the “V” register so that
South Australian Museum numbers prefixed by V
indicate helminths.
When T. H. Johnston arrived in Adelaide he already
had a considerable private collection, mostly from
Qucensland and New South Wales. This was contin-
ually added to unul his death, when responsibility for
ihe now substantial collection, housed in the Univer-
sity of Adelaide, was assumed primarily by P.. M,
Thomas (nee Mawson) and L. M. Angel. By 1972
Professor J. Arundel (Veterinary Parasitology, Uni-
versity of Melbourne) had begun to express concern
over the future of this valuable and still expanding
collection. He commenced negotiations with the Aus-
tralian Society of Parasitology in 1974 and in 1975
had begun the.search for funding to provide permanent
housing and curation.
Negotiations with the South Australian Museum
resulted in an after by the Museum to holise the
collection, without accepting responsibility for its
curation. On the retirement of Miss Angel, from the
University, in 1976, part of the collection was moved
to the Museum, with Miss Angel as Honorary Asso-
ciate to tend it. At the 1977 Annual General Meeting
of the Australian Socicty of Parasitology a resolution
was adopted that the collection should be properly
housed and curated in a Museum, At the Annual
General Meeting of 1978 the following proposals were
adopted: that the Society would support an application
from the Museum to the Australian Biological Study
Resources Interim Council for funds ia support a
curator of the collection; that a committee be estab-
lished to report on the collections of parasites held
in Australia: that the committee seck an appropriate
name for the collection. At the Annual General Meet-
ing, of 1979 the constitution was. amended to include
*Present address, Gippsland Institute of Advanced Education, P:O. Box 42, Churchill, Victoria ak45,
386
6
among the objects of the Society
establishment and proper curation of collections of
Australian Parasites”. The committee recommended
at the 1980 Annual General Meeting in Perth that
the collection be known as The Australian Helmin-
thological Collection.
The remainder of the collection was moved to the
Museum in 1980 when Mrs Thomas (now also an
Honorary Associate of the Museum) retired from the
University of Adelaide in 1980. Through the funding
programme of the Bureau of Flora and Fauna, The
Australian Biological Resources Study, grants have
been made available for a temporary research assistant
to undertake some curatorial work. However the long-
term prospects for the safety of the collection remain
in doubt. A survey of Australian collections conducted
by D. M. Spratt for the Australian Society of Para-
sitology in 1979 indicated that the combined South
Australian Museum Collection and Australian Hel-
minthological Collection constituted considerably
more than half the total helminth collection in this
country. The index-catalogue of helminth species of
the world, arranged by genera and cross-referenced
for Australian hosts remains unique. New accessions
continue to be received so that the collection now
comprises over 11,000 bottles and some thousands of
slides, most of which, as yet, remain uncatalogued.
Free-living species are listed separately under their
family according to Filipjev, 1934. Parasitic forms,
listed alphabetically under the original generic name,
are grouped in superfamilies (also listed alphabetically)
as designated by C I H Keys to the Nematode parasites
of Vertebrates. Where a name change has occurred
the most recent acceptable name is given, together
with the relevant reference. Host species names are
those used in the original descriptions. The following
abbreviations were used in the text. BAN-
ZARE = British, Australia and New Zealand Antarc-
tic Research Expedition, 1929-1931; N.T. = Northern
Territory; N.S.W. = New South Wales;
Qld = Queensland; S.A. = South Australia;
S.A.M. = South Australian Museum;
A.H.C. = Australian Helminthological Collection,
Tas. = Tasmania; Vic. = Victoria; W.A. = Western
Australia.
Individual collectors have not been acknowledged
for each species because designations have not always
been made in the literature. However the following
people are known to have made substantial donations
of nematode material: Dr T. L. Bancroft, Dr M. J.
Mackerras, Mr A. S. LeSouef, Professor J. B. Cleland,
Dr F. H. S. Roberts, Dr S, J. Edmonds, Mr
B. Munday, Dr J. H. Arundel, Dr I. Beveridge, Dr
D. M. Spratt and Mr R. Green. The preparators of
the South Australian Museum and the Northern Ter-
ritory Administration, Animal Industry Branch have
also made substantial donations.
REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (17): 385-413
April, 1983
FREE LIVING NEMATODA
Family Chromadoridae
Harveyjohnstonia kartanum Mawson, 1953
Holotype ¢, allotype 2 V3075
From littoral rock scrapings Pennington Bay, Kan-
garoo Island, S.A.
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust., 76: 39-40
Family Enoplidae
Metoncholaimus brevispiculum Mawson, 1957
Holotype ¢, allotype 2 V3076
Jetty piles, Brighton, S.A.
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust., 80: 101-2
Pontonema hackingi Mawson, 1953
Holotype ¢ V1862, allotype 2? V1863
Off Port Hacking, N.S.W.
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust., 76: 37-8
Symplocostomella johnstoni Mawson, 1953
Holotype ? V1861
Trawled at 7200m, 5 miles east of Point Gibbon,
N.S.W.
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust., 76: 38
Thoracostoma australe Mawson, 1953
Holotype ¢ V1859, allotype 2 V1860
Dredging Station off Port Hacking, N.S.W.
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust., 76: 36
Family Monhysteridae
Steineria pulchra Mawson, 1957
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V3077
Weeds on jetty pile, Outer Harbor, S.A.
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust., 80: 103-5
PARASITIC NEMATODA
Superfamily Acuarioidea
Acuaria colluricinclae Mawson, 1972
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 96 (3), p. 145
Holotype 3, allotype 2 V1511 from Colluricincla rufi-
ventris
Gizzard: collected Eyre Peninsula, S.A.
Acuaria flindersi Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 65 (1), p. 31-2
Holotype 3, allotype 2? V1420 from Hieracidea orien-
talis
Gizzard: collected Flinders Is.
Acuaria microecae, Mawson, 1972
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 96 (3), p. 145
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1512 from Microeca leuco-
phaea
Gizzard: collected Waikerie, S.A.
HELMINTH TYPE SPECIMENS IN THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 487
Acvaria mirafrae Mawson, 1972
Trans, R, Soe, S. Aust. 96 (3), p, 147
Holotype 3, V1513 from Mira/fra javanica
Gizzard: collecied Northern Territory.
Paratypes AHC5226
Acuaria petterae Mawson, 1972
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 96 (3), p. 144
Holotype 3, allotype 2 V1510 from La/age leucomela
Gizzard; collected Katherine Gorge, N.T.
Paratypes AHC5219
Acuaria streperina Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Proc, Linn. Soc. N.S. W. 64 (3-4), p. 254-5
Holotype 2, allotype 2° V1432 from Strepera melan-
oplera
Gizzard: collected Waikerie, S,A,
Cheilonematodum halcyonis Johnston & Mawson,
1941
Prac. Linn. Soc, N.S. W. 66 (3-4), p, 253-4
Holotype 4 V3045, allotype 9 V3046 trom JTaleyon
SQNclUs
Stomach: collected Milson [s., N.S.W,
Paratypes AHC900
Chevreuxia australis Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Trans. R. Soe. S. Aust. 65 (2), p. 259
Holotype 2 V1446
Stomach: collected Tailem Bend, S.A.
Cosmocephalus australiensis Johnston & Mawson,
1952
Trans. R. Soe. 8. Aust. 75, p. 34-5
now Svnhimanius australiensis (Johnston & Mawson,
1952) Beveridge & Barker 1975
Holotype ¢ V1866, allotype 2? V1867 from Aydromys
chrysogaster
Stomach: collected Tailem Bend, S.A.
Paratypes AHCI 701
Cosmocephalus jaenschi Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Trans, R: Soc. 8. Aust. 65 (2), p. 259
Holotype 2 V 1445, allotype 2 V1452 from Phalacro-
corax carbo
Stomach: collected Tailem Bend, S.A.
Dispharynx pelecani Johnston & Mawson, 1942
Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 7 (2), p. 185
now Synhimantus (Dispharynx) pelecani (Johnston. &
Mawson, 1942) Chabaud 1975
Holotype 2, allotype 2 V1453 from Pelecanus conspi-
cillatus
Under lining of gizzard: collected Tailem Bend, S.A.
Echinuria querquedulae Johnston & Mawson, |942
Trans. R, Soc, 8. Aust. 66 (1), p. 71
Holotype , allotype ? V1293 from Querquedula gib-
berifrons
Gizzard: collected Tailem Bend, S.A.
Paryseria diomedeae Johnston & Mawson, |942
Trans. R. Soc, 8. Aust. 66 (1), p. 69-70
now Sleguophorus diomedeae (Johnston & Mawson,
1942) Johnston & Mawson, 1945
Holotype 2, allotype 3 V1349 from Diomedea exulans
Stomach: collected Port Jackson, N.S_W.
Paratypes AHC309, 366
Paryseria macronectes Johnston & Mawson, 1942
Trans. R. Sac. S. Aust. 66 (1), p. 70
now Stegophorus macronectes (Johnston & Mawson,
1942) Johnston & Mawson, 1945
Holotype 2 V1348 from Macronectes giganteus
Stomach: collected Brighton, S.A.
Paryseria pachyptilae Johnston & Mawson, 1942
Trans. R. Soe. S. Aust. 66 (1), p. 70
now Sfegophorus pachyptilae (Johnston & Mawsarr,
1942) Johnston & Mawson, 1945
Holotype 2 V 1346, allotype 6 V1347 fram Pachyptilla
witata
Stomach: collected Sellicks Beach, S.A.
Seuratia marina Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Trans. R. Soe. 8. Aust. 65 (2), p. 259-60
Holotype ¢ V2824, allotype 2? V2825 from Pelago-
droma marina
Stomach: collected Flinders Is., Bass St,
Paratypes AHC995, 7798
Stamimerinema suffodiax Beveridge & Barker. 1975
J. Helminth, 49, p. 212-5.
Holotype 2 V6, allotype 2 V62 from Antechinus
stuartl
Stomach: collected Sherbrook Forest, Vic
Paratypes V63
Stegophorus heardi Mawson, 1953
Parasitology 43 (3-4), p. 295-6
Holotype $ V2898 from Oveaniies vceanicus
Stomach: collected Heard Is.
Superfamily Ankylostomatoidea
Unetnaria hydromvidis Beveridge, 1980
J. Parasitol 66 (6) p. 1207-31
Holotype ¢ V1868, allotype 2? V1869 from Midreniyr
chrysogaster
Small intestine; collected Daintree, Qld
Paratypes AHC6348 & V1870-87
Superfamily Aproctoidea
Aprocta bakeri Bain & Mawson, 1981
Ree. S. Aust. Mus. 18 (13) p. 269-71
Holotype 4 V¥2100 from Cureus orru
Nasal cavity: collected Warwick, Qld
Aprocta bouwlengeri Bain & Mawson, 1981
Rec, S. Aust. Mus. 18 (13) p. 269
Holotype 2 V2098, allotype 4 V2099 from Strenere
graculina
Head and nasal cavity: collected Qld
388
Aprocta corvicala Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Trans. R. Soc. 8. Aust. 64 (2), p. 358
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1402 trom Corvus coronoides
Orbit: collected Musgrave Ranges, 8.A,
Paralype AHCS77
Austrofilaria vestibulata Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Trans, R. Soe. 8S. dust. 64 (2), p. 357
now proeta Vvestibulata (Johnston & Mawson, 1940)
Bain & Mawson, 1981
Holotype 4, allotype 2? V1406 from Aphelocephala
nigriciua
Orbit: collected Musgrave Ranges, S.A.
Cotypes AHC87&
Diomedenema divomedeae Johnston & Mawson, 1952
Trans. R. Soe, S. Aust. 75, p. 32
Syntypes V2827 from Diomedea chrysostoma
Body cavity: calleeted Brighton, 8.A.
Paralypes AHC310
Pseyudaprocta copemani Bain & Mawson, 198]
Rec, S. Aust. Mus, 18 (3) p., 266-7
Holotype @ V209%6, allotype 4 Y2097 from Petroica
multicolor
Collected Maggs ML, Tas,
Pseudaprocta myzarithae Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Trans. R. Sac. 8. Aust. 64, p, 358-9
Holotype 2 V1403 from Myzantha flavigula
Body cavity: collected Renmark, §,A,
Superfamily Ascaridoidea
Anisakis kogiae Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Ree, S. Ase. Mus. & (3), p, 203-6
Holotype 4, allotype @ V1337 from Kogia breviceps
Stomach: calleeted Port Victoria, S.A.
Cantracaecum hancrofli Johnston & Mawson, 194]
Trans, Ro Soe. 8. Aust. 68 (1), p. 112-3
Holotype ¢, allotype ? V1433 from Pelecanus
conspicilarus
Stomach: collected Burnett R., Old
Contracaceum clelandi Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Trans, R. Soe, S. Aust, 65 (1), p. E13
Holotype @, allotype ¢ V1434 from Pelecanus
conspicillatus
Stomach: collected Perth, W.A.
Contracaecum eudyptulae Johnston & Mawson, 1942
Proc, Linn. Sac. N.S.W. 67 (1-2), p. 93-4
Holotype 2, allotype 2 V1294 from Eudyptula miner
Digestive tract: collected Encounter Bay, S.A.
Paratypes AHC| 709
Contracaecum magnicollare Johnston & Mawson,
194)
Trans. R. Sov. 8S. Aust. 65 (1), p. 114
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1435 from Anous stolidus
Stomach: collected N-W Islet, Capricorn Group,
Barrier Reef
REC, §. AUST. MUS., 18 (17): 385-413
April, 1983
Contracaccum murrayense Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 64 (2), p. 344
Holotype 2, allotype ? V139! from Mecullochella
mracquartensls
Stomach: collected Tailem Bend, S.A,
Paratypes AHC389
Contracaecum ogmorhinae Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Ree. S. Aust. Mus. 6 (4), p. 431-2
Holotype 3, allotype ? V1268 from //ydrurga leptonys
Stomach: collected Port Adelaide, S.A.
Contracaecum podicipitis Jonnston & Mawson, 1949
Trans. R. Soe. S. Aust, 73, p. 67
Holotype 4 V3047, allotype ? V3048 from Podiceps
cristatus
Stomach: collected Tailem Bend, S.A,
Paratypes AHC306
Contracaecum sintlabiarum Johnston & Mawson,
1941
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 65 (1), p. 113-114
Holotype 2, allotype 2 V1436 from Plotus novaehol-
landiue
Stomach: collected Burnett R., Qld
Paratypes AHC994
Goezia fluviatilis Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 64 (2), p. 342-3
Holotype 4, allotype @ V1393 from Plectroplites
ambiguus
Gill mucous: collected Tailem Bend, §.A.
Ophidascaris varani Johnston & Mawson, 1947
Trans. R. Soc, S. Aust. 71 (1), p. 23-4
now Amplicaecum mackerrasxae (Johnston &
Mawson, 1947) Thomas, 1959
Holotype é V2876 from Waranus varius
Alimentary canal; collected Toowoomba, Old
Paratypes AHC31 54
Paraheterotyphium australe Johnston & Mawson, 194%
Rec, S. Aust. Mus, 9 (1), p, 102-4
Holotype 2, allotype 2 V815 from Hydrus platurus
Intestine: collected Little Bay, Sydney, N.S.W.
Paratypes AHC1438
Paranisakis australis Johnston & Mawson, 1943
Trans. R, Soe. S. Aust. 67 (2), p. 190
Holotype 4, allotype 9 V1289 from Urolophis
australis
Intestine: collected Sydney, N.S.W.
Phocasearis hyvdrurgae Johnston & Mawson, 194]
Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 6 (4), p. 432
now Contracaecum osculatum (Rud) Johnston &
Mawson, 1945
Holotype V1272 from Hydrurga leptonyx
Stomach: collected Port Adelaide, 8.A.
Note: Re-examination of P. Hydrurgae type material,
by the authors, revealed it to be a pre-adult stage
of C. oxsculatum
HELMINTH TYPE SPECIMENS IN THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SKY
Porracaecum circinum Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Trans, R, Soe. 8. Aust, 65 (1), p. 30-1
Holotype 2 Vi4d18 from Circus assimilis
Intestine: collected Orroroo, S.A.
Porrocaecum clelandi Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Prac. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 66 (3-4), p. 252
Holotype 2, allotype 2 V1425 from Oreocinela lunulata
Intestine: collected Bunya Mts, Qld
Porrocaecum kogiae Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Ree. S. Aust. Mus. 6 (3), p. 266
Holotype ¢, allotype 2 V1338 from Kogia breviceps
Stomach: collected Spencer's Gulf, S.A.
Paratypes AHC1606
Porrocaecuni lobibycis Mawson, 1968
Parasitology 58, p, 284-5
Holotype ¢ V1467 from Lohibyx novaehollandiae
Duodenum: collected Naracoorte, S.A.
Paralypes AHC4495
Porrocaecum streperae Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Proce. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 66 (3-4), p. 253
Holotype 2 V1426 from Strepera versicolor
Intestine: collected Mt Kosiusko, N.S.W.
Stomachus aceanicus Johnston & Mawson, 1951
Ree. 4. Mus, 22 (4), p. 293
now Anisakis eceanicus (Johnston & Mawson,
1951) Hariwich, 1974
Stomach: collected stranded on coast of N.S.W.
Paratypes AHC]| 699
Terranova chilosevilit Johnston & Mawson. 1951
Ree, A. Adys. 22 (4), p. 291
from Chiloseyllium punctarun
Stomach; collected Halfway Is., Keppel Islands, Qld
Paratypes AHC1661
Superfamily Camallanoidea
Procamallanus murrayensis Johnston & Mawson,
1940
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 64 (2), p. 347
Holotype 2, allotype 2 VL380 from Pseudaphritis
wrviller
Alimentary canal: collected Swan Reach, 8.A,
Superfamily Cosmocercoidea
Aplectana flindersi Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 7, p. 148
now Maxvachonia flindersi (Johnston & Mawson,
1941) Mawson, 1972
Holotype @ V1408 from //yla_jervisiensis
Rectum: collected Kangaroo Is., S.A.
Cosmocera (imnodynastes Johnston & Simpson, 1942
Trans. R. Soc, S. Aust. 66 (2), p. 174-6
Holotype 2 V1275 from Liminodynastes dorsalis
Intestine: collected Adelaide, S.A.
Paratype AHC2372
Maxyvachonia brygooi Mawson, 1972
Trans, R, Soe. 8. Aust. 96 (2), p. 102-4
Holotype 2 V1503 from Amphiholurus decressi
Rectum: collected Eyre Peninsula, 8.A,
Maxvachonia chahaudi Mawson, 1972
Trans. R. Sac. S. Aust. 96 (2), p. 102
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1502 from Morethia
lincoucellata
Rectum: collected Eyre Peninsula, S.A.
Maxvachonia ewers! Mawson, 1972
Trans. R. Soc. 8. Aust, 96 (2), p. 105-6
Holotype 4, allotype 9 V1504 from Litoria nasuta
Rectum: collected Brown R.. New Guinea
Paratypes AHC5188
Spironoura hylae Johnston & Simpson, |942
Trans. R, Soe, S. Aust, 66 (2), p. 173
now Falcaustra simpsoni (Johnston & Simpson,
1942) Chabaud, 1978
Holotype 4 V2892, allotype V2893 from Hila aurea
Intestine: collected Sydney, N.S.W.
Paratypes AHC2313
Note: S, /i/ae was found to be a nom praeoec. by
Johnston & Mawson, 1944
Spironaura elsevae Johnston & Mawson. 1941
Rec, Aust. Mus. 21 (1). p. 15
now Falcausira elsevae (Johnston & Mawson, 1941)
Chabaud, 1978
from Elseva dentata
Intestine: collected Northern Australia
Paratypes AHC1666
Superfamily Dioctophymatoidea
Eustrongvlides phalacrocoracis Johnston & Mawson,
194]
Trans. R. Soc. .S. Aust, 65 (2), p, 255-6
Holotype 2. allotype 2? V1450 from Phalacrocoran
carbo
Sub-peritoncal tissue of stomach; collected Tailem
Bend, S.A.
Fustrongvlides plotinus Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Trans. R. Soc, S. Aust. 65 (2), p. 256
Holotype 4 V1451 from Anhinga novachallandiae
Body cavity: collected Burnett R., Qld
Superfamily Diplotriaenoidea
Diplotriaena alpha Johnston & Mawson. 1940
Trans, R. Soc, S. Aust. 64 (2), p. 359-60
Holotype @ V1394 from Strepera graculina
Peritoneum: collected Mt Irvine, S.A.
Diplotriaena beta Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Trans. R. Soe, S. Aust. 64 (2), p. 360
Holotype 2 V1395 from Corvus coronoides
Body cavity: collected Eidsvold, Qld
390
Diplorriaena beveridgei Bain & Mawson, 1981
Rec. 8, dust. Mus, 18 (3), p. 278-80
Holotype 2 V2103, allotype ¢ V2104 from Corvus
orrit
Nasal cavity; collected Warwick, Qid
Diplotriaena delta Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Trans. R. Soe. S. Aust. 64 (2), p. 360
Holotype 6 V1397 from Malurus lambert
Body caviiy: collected Ooldea, S.A.
Diplolriaena epsilon Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 64 (2), p. 360
Holotype 4, allotype ° V1398 from Cracticus
destructar
Body cavity: collected Brisbane, Qld
Diplotriaena gamma Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Trans. R. Soc. 8. Aust, 64 (2), p. 360
Holotype 2 V1396 from Spres superbus
Body cavity: collected Adelaide S.A.
Diplotriaena smithi Bain & Mawson, 1981
Rec, 8. dust. Mus, 18 (13), p. 280
Holotype 2 V2105, allotype ¢ V2106 from Acantho-
genys rifogularis
Collected the Bunkers, S.A.
Diplotriaena spratti Bain & Mawson, 1981
Ree. S. Aust. Mus. 18 (13), p. 277
Holotype @ V2101, allotype ¢ V2102 from Oreoica
eulteralis
Body cavity: collected Petermann Ra., N.T.
Paratypes V2669-80
Diplotriaena zeta Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Trans. R, Soc, 8. Aust, 64 (2), p. 361
Holotype @ V1399 from Acanthogenys rufigularis
Body cavity; collected Monarto, S.A,
Hamatospiculuimn chibiae Johnston & Mawson, 194)
Ree. A. Mus. 21 (1), p. 14-5
from Chihla bracteata
Skin of neck: collected Russell Is., Qld
Paratypes AHC1667
Hamatoaspiculum halcyonis Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Rec. A. Mus. 21 (1), p. 14
from Halevon pyrrhapygius
Eye balls and roof of mouth: collected Mt Lyndhurst,
S.A.
Paratypes AHC893, 1079
Hamatospiculum howense Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Trans, R. Soc. S. Aust, 64 (2), p, 355-6
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1404 from Halcyon vagans
Sub-cutaneaus tissue; collected Lord Howe Is.
Hamatospiculum meneilli Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Rec, A. Mus. 21 (1), p. 12-14
from Ninox boobook
RECS, AUST. MUS., 18 (17): 385-413
lpril, 1983
Tissues adjacent to skull: collected Hayman Is.,
Whitsunday Group, Qld.
Paraltypes AHC862
Superfamily Dracunculoidea
Anguillicola australiensis Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Trans, R, Soc. S. Aust. 64 (2), p. 351
Holotype 2, allotype 2 V1392 from Anguilla
reinhardtii
Swim bladder: coliected Prospect Reservoir, Sydney,
N.S.W.
Paratypes AHC586
Philometra plectroplites Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Trans. R. Sac. S. Aust. 64 (2), p. 348-9
Holotype @ V1384 from Plectroplites ambiguus
Body cavity: collected Murray Bridge, S.A.
Philometra percalates Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Trans. R. Soc. §. Aust. 64 (2), p. 349
Holotype 4, allotype 9 V1385 from Percalates colon-
orum
Body cavity: collected Tailem Bend, S.A.
Superfamily Filarioidea
Carinema dubia Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 64 (2), p, 357-8
now Cardiofilaria duhia (Johnston & Mawson, 1940)
Sonin, 1961
Holotype 4, allotype @ V1400 from Pseudopsittacus
melennani
Abdominal cavity: collected North Qld,
Carinema graucalinum Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Trans. R. Soc. §. Aust, 64 (2), p. 358
now Cardiofilaria graucalinum (Johnston & Mawson,
1940) Sonin, 1961
Holotype 3, allotype @ VI401 from Graucalus
melanops
Abdominal cavity; collected Fraser Is,, Qld.
Dipetalonema annulipapillatum Johnston & Mawson,
1938
Trans. R. Soc. Aust, 62 (1), p, 117-8
now Breinlia (Johnstonema) annulipapillatum
(Johnston & Mawson. 1938) Chabaud & Bain,
1976
Holotype ¢ V2826, allotype ? V3] from Onychogale
fraenata
Sub-cutaneus: collected Burnett R., Qld
Note: Spratt & Varughese, 1975 found that the holo-
type of D. annulipapillatum was damaged, one
spicule missing and badly discoloured.
Dipetalonema boltoni Spratt & Varughese, 1975
Aust. J. Zool. Suppl. Ser. 35, p. 70-4
now Brejnlia (Breinlia) boltoni (Sprau &
Varughese, 1975) Chabaud & Bain 1976
HELMINTH TYPE SPECIMENS IN THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 491
Holotype 4 V1130, allotype 9 V1I31 from Macropus
agilis
Peritoneal cavity: collected Townsville, Qld
Paratype V1132
Dipetalonema dasyuri Johnston & Mawson, 1938
Trans. R, Soc. S. Aust. 62 (1), p. 109
now 8Sreinlia (Breinlia) dasyuri (Johnston &
Mawsan, 1938) Chabaud & Bain, 1976
Holotype 4, allatype ? V1126 from Dusyurus viverrinus
Body cavity: callected Vic,
Cotypes AHC2946
Dipetalonema dentonensis Spratt & Varughese, 1975
Aust, J Zool. Suppl. Ser, 35, p. 48-52
now Breinlia (Breinlia) dentonensis (Spratt &
Varughese, 1975) Chabaud & Bain, 1976
Holotype 2 VII41, allotype 2 VI 142 from Macropus
Blganteus
Subcutaneous connective tissue: collected *Denton’
Morella, Qld
Paratypes V1143
Dipetalonema lutreali Mackerras, 1962
Aust. J. Zool. 10 (3), p. 406-9
new Dipetalonema (Chenofilaria) johnstoni
(Mackerras, 1962) Chabaud & Bain, 1976
from Rattus lutreolus
Connective tissue: collected West Burleigh, Qld
Paralypes AHC3993
Dipetalonema niundayi Spratt & Varughese, 1975
Aust. J. Zool. Suppl. Ser. 35, p. 67-70
now Breinlia (Breinlia) mundayi (Spratt &
Varughese, 1975) Chabaud & Bain, 1976
Holotype 4 V1144, allotype 2 V1145 from Afacropus
rufogriseus frulicus
Pericardium: collected Rass, Tas.
Paratypes V1146
Dipetalonema pearsoni Spratt & Varughese, 1975
Aust. J. Zool. Suppl. Ser. 35, p. 33-6
now Dinetalonema (Chenofilaria) pearsoni (Spratt
& Varughese, 1975) Chabaud & Bain, 1976
Holotype 3 V1139, allotype 2 V1140 from /soodon
macrourus
Subcutaneous tissue: collected Woolwonga, N.T.
Dipetalonema pseudocheiri Spratt & Varughese, 1975
Aust. J. Zool. Suppl. Ser. 35, p. 60-3
now Breinlia (Breinlia) pseudocheirt (Spratt &
Varughese, 1975) Chabaud & Bain, 1976
Holotype ¢ V1127, allotype @ V1128 trom Pseudo-
cheirus convalutor
Peritoneal cavity: collected Launceston, Tas.
Paratypes V1129
Dipetalonema rarum Johnston & Mawson, 1938
Trans, R. Soc. 8S. Aust. 62 (1), p. 114
now Breinlia (Breinlia) rarum (Johnston &
Mawson, 1938) Chabaud & Bain, 1976
Syntype 9? V1123 from Onvchogale fraenata
Subcutaneous: collected Vic.
Dipetalonema roberts Johnston & Mawson, 1938
Ree. S. Aust. Mus. 6 (2), p. 188-9
now Breinlia (Breinlia) roberisi (Johnston &
Mawson, 1938) Chabaud & Bain, 1976
Halotype 4, allotype 2 V1124 from Macropus robustus
Body cavity: collected Normanton, N. Qld
Dipetalonema tenue Johnston & Mawson, 1938
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 62 (1), p. 118-20
now Breinlia (Breinlia) robertsi (Johnston &
Mawson, 1938 after Spratt & Varughese, 1975)
Chahaud & Bain, 1976
Holotype 2 V1125 from Macropus robustus
Body cavity: callecied Cockatoo Creek, N.T.
Dipetalonema venacavincola Spratt & Varughese, 1975
Aust. J. Zool. Suppl. Ser. 35, p. 36-40
now Spraitia venacavincola (Spratt & Varughese,
1975) Chabaud & Bain, 1976
Holotype 2 V1147, allotype 2 V1148 from Trichusurtis
Caninus
Inferior vena cava & heptic
Tamborine, Qld
Paratypes V1149
veins: collected
Johnstonema andersoni Spratt & Varughese, 1975
Aust, J, Zool. Suppl. Ser. 35, p. 14-17
now Brein/ia (Jahnstonema) andersoni (Spratt &
Varughese, 1975) Chabaud & Bain, 1976
Holotype 4 V1135, allotype 2 V1136 from Megaleia
rufa
Subcutaneous connective tissue: collecied Quilpie, Qld
Paratypes VJ 137
Johnstonema woerle] Spratt & Varughese, 1975
Aust. J. Zool. Suppl. Ser. 35, p. 17-20
now Breinlia (Johnstonema) woerlei (Spratt &
Varughese, 1975) Chabaud. & Bain, 1976
Holotype 4 V1138 from Petrogale venustula
Heart: collected Cannon Hill, N.T.
Josefilaria mackerrasse Moorhouse, Bain & Wolf, 1979
Annal. Parasit. Jlum. et comp. 54 (6), p, 645-51
from Macrederma gigay
Fascia of pectoral muscles: collected Ridgeland, near
Rockhampton, Qid
Paratypes V1913-4
Liromasa miniopteri Mackerras, 1962
Aust. J. Zool. 10 (3), p. 403-4
fram Miniopteris schretbersi
Heart: Mt Pleasant, Qld
Paratypes AHC3994
Paralemdana cleland) Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Trans, R. Sac. S. Aust. 64 (2), p. 356-7
Holotype 2 V1405 from Strepera graculina
Body cavity: collected Scone, N'S.W.
392 REC. 8. AUST. MUS., 18 (17); 385-413
Piratuba queenslandensis Mackerras, 1962
just, J. Zoal. 10 (3), p. 443
from Varanus (ristis orientalis
Lungs: collected Innisfail, Qid
Paratypes AHCO3995
Piratuha varanicola Mackerras, 1962
stust, J. Zool, 10 (3), p. 444
from Varanus tristis orientalis
Pleural covering of lungs: collected Innisfail, Qld
Paratypes AHC4000
Saurofilaria innisfailensis Mackerras, 1962
Aust J. Zool, 10 (3), p. 448
possibly how Macdonaldius innisfailensis (Mack-
erras, 1962) Chahaud & Bain, 1976
from Physignathus leseurii
Subperitoncal tissue: Innisfail, Qid
Paralypes AHC3966
Vagrifilaria ausiralis Johnston & Mawson, 1942
Proe. Linn, Soe. N.S.W. 67 (1-2), p. 93
now Aprocta australis (Johnston & Mawson,
1942) Bain & Mawson, 198]
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1295 from Cenfropus phasi-
anus
Colon: collected West Burleigh, Qld
Superfamily Gnathostomatoidea
Tangua ophidis Johnston & Mawson, 1948
Rec, S. dust. Mus, 9 (1), p, 104-5
Holotype ¢ V2894. allotype 2 V2895 trom Nairix
mairil
Alimentary canal: collected N-W coast, Qld
Paratypes AHC 1441
Superfamily Habronematoidea
Ascarophis australis Johnston & Mawson, 1944
Trans. R. Soe. S. Aust. 68 (1), p. 62
Holotype 4 V1255, allotype 2 V1256 from Threplertus
macnlosus
Alimentary. canal: collected Cape Border, S.A.
Asearophis cooperi Johnston & Mawson, 1945
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 69 (1), p. 115-6
Holotype 4 V1257, allotype @ V1258 from Platyce-
phalus bassensis
Alimentary canal: collected Rapid Bay, S.A.
tscaruphis murrayensis Johnston & Mawson, 1947
Rev. S. Aust. Mus. 8 (4), p. 553
Holotype 2 V1253, allotype 2 V1254 from Plectroplites
UHM eUMS
Alimentary canal: collected Tailem Bend, S.A.
Crassicauda magna Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 6 (3), p. 266-8
Holotype 2 V2833 from Kogia breviceps
Neck connecttve tissue: collected Pt Victoria, S.A.
Paratypes AHCI599, 1607
April, 1983
Cyrnea dentifera Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Proc, Linn, Sac, N.S. W. 66 (3-4), p. 255
now Excisa dentifera (Johnston & Mawson, 1941)
Chabaud, 1958
Holotype 3. allotype 2 V1429 from Eupodotis australis
Gizzard: collected Mt Leibig. N.T.
Cyrnea (Pracyrnea) dollfusi Mawson, 1968
Parasitology 58, p. 750-2
now Procyrnea dollfusi
Chabaud, 1975
Holotype 2, allotype 2 V1489 from Ninox novaesee-
lundiae
Gizzard: collected Berrimah, N.T-
Paratypes AHC4674
Cyrrnea (P.) falco Mawson, 1968
Parasitology 58, p. 752-3
now Procyrnea falco (Mawson, 1968) Chabaud,
1975
Holotype 2, allotype @ V1490 from Falco longipennis
Gizzard: collected Humpty Doo, N.T.
Paratypes AHC4679
(Mawson, 1968),
Cyrnea spiralis Mawson, 1968
Parasitology 58, p. 753-5
now Microhadjelia spiralis (Mawson, 1968) comb,
nova Mawson, pers. comm.
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1491 from Philemon argen-
ticeps
Gizzard: collected Berrimah, N.T.
Paratypes AHC4648
Excisa hiloba Mawson, 1968
Parasitology 58, p. 755-8
Holotype 2, allotype 2 V1492 from Podargus strigoides
Gizzard: collected Brisbane, Qld
Paratypes AHC4670
Geapetitia chibiae Mawson, 1966
Parasitology 56, p. 716-7
Holotype 2 V1455 from Chihia bracteala
Wall of proventriculus: Milner’s Swamp, N,T.
Geopetitia falco Mawson, 1966
Parasitology 56, p. 717-8
Holotype & V1456 from Falco longipennis
Under lining of proventriculus: collected Humpty
Doo, N.T.
Geopetitia streperae Mawson, 1966
Parasitology 56, p. 715-6
Holotype 4, allotype 2? V1454 from Strepera melan-
oplera
Wall of proventriculus: collected Naracoorte, S.A.
Paratypes AHC4642
Hahronema aegotheles Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Trans. R. Soc. S, dust. 65 (2), p. 256-7
now Alainchabandia aegotheles (Johnston &
Mawson, 1941) Mawson, 1968
HELMINTH TYPE SPECIMENS IN THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1447 from Aegotheles cristata
Under gizzard lining: collected Tailem Bend, S.A.
Habronema paraleptoptera Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 65 (1), p. 32-3
now Cyrnea (Procyrnea) paraleptoptera (Johnston
& Mawson, 1941) Chabaud, 1958
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1421 from Cerchneis cen-
chroides
Stomach: collected West Burleigh, Qld
Hedruris hylae Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 7 (1), p. 148
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1261 from Hyla jervisiensis
Stomach: collected Kangaroo Is., S.A.
Hedruris longispicula Thomas, 1959
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 82, p. 160-1
Holotype 2 V2829 from Lygosoma challengeri
Alimentary canal: collected Springbank, Qld
Note: The description of this species was published
in the only paper by Mrs Thomas in which acci-
dentally she did not use the name Mawson.
Microtetrameres aegotheles Mawson, 1977
Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 17 (14), p. 253
Holotype ¢, allotype 2 V1540 from Aegotheles cristata
Proventriculus: collected Markanka, N.T.
Microtetrameres cacomantis Mawson, 1977
Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 17 (14), p. 253
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1534 from Cacomantis vari-
olosus
Proventriculus: collected Tobermory, N.T.
Microtetrameres cerci Mawson, 1977
Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 17 (14), p. 255
Holotype 6 V1537 from Circus assimilis
Proventriculus: collected Petermann Ra., N.T.
Microtetrameres coracinae Mawson, 1977
Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 17 (14), p. 253
Holotype ¢, allotype 2 V1530 from Coracina novae-
hollandiae
Proventriculus: collected Culburra, S.A.
Microtetrameres cractici Mawson, 1977
Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 17 (14), p. 251
Holotype ¢ V1528 from Cracticus torquatus
Proventriculus: collected Eyre Peninsula, S.A.
Microtetrameres eopsaltriae Mawson, 1977
Rec. S. Aust. 17 (14), p. 253
Holotype ¢, allotype 2 V1536 from Eopsaltria australis
Proventriculus: collected Heatherleigh, S.A.
Microtetrameres gymnorhinae Mawson, 1977
Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 17 (14), p. 251
Holotype ¢, allotype 2 V1538 from Gymnorhina tibicen
tibicen
Proventriculus: collected Canberra, A.C.T.
Microtetrameres melophagidea Mawson, 1977
Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 17 (14), p. 248
393
Holotype 4, allotype 2? V1529 from Acanthogenys rufo-
gularis
Proventriculus: collected Pt Augusta, S.A.
Paratypes AHC5914
Microtetrameres mirafrae Mawson, 1977
Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 17 (14), p. 249
Holotype 6 V1535 from Mirafra javanica
Proventriculus: collected N.T.
Microtetrameres ninoctis Mawson, 1977
Rec. S. Aust Mus. 17 (14), p. 256
Holotype ¢, allotype 2 V1525 from Ninox novaezee-
landiae
Proventriculus: collected Berrimah, N.T.
Microtetrameres paraccipiter Mawson, 1977
Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 17 (14), p. 253
Holotype 2 V1527 from Accipiter fasciatus
Proventriculus: collected Darwin, N.T.
Microtetrameres philemon Mawson, 1977
Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 17 (14), p. 249
Holotype ¢, allotype ? V1539 from Philemon argen-
ticeps
Proventriculus: collected Coomalie Ck, N.T.
Microtetrameres raptoris Mawson, 1977
Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 17 (14), p. 255
Holotype ¢, allotype 2 V1526 from Falco peregrinus
Proventriculus: collected Pt Augusta, S.A.
Paratypes AHC5906
Microtetrameres sphecotheres Mawson, 1977
Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 17 (14), p. 253
Holotype ¢ V1532 from Sphecotheres flaviventris
Proventriculus: collected Katherine Gorge, N.T.
Microtetrameres streperae Mawson, 1977
Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 17 (14), p. 251
Holotype 4, allotype 2? V1533 from Strepera versicolor
Proventriculus: collected Waikerie, S.A.
Microtetrameres tytonis Mawson, 1977
Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 17 (14), p. 257
Holotype ¢, allotype 2 V1531 from Tyto alba
Proventriculus: collected Banka Banka, N.T.
Tetrameres anseranas Mawson, 1979
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 103 (7), p. 178-80
Holotype ¢ V2681, allotype 2 V2682 from Anseranas
semipalmata
Proventriculus: collected Humpty Doo, N.T.
Paratypes AHC6941
Tetrameres australis Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 65 (2), p. 262
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1451 from Chenopsis atrata
Proventriculus: collected Tailem Bend, S.A.
Tetrameres bizurae Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 65 (2), p. 261-2
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1414 from Biziura lobata
Proventriculus: collected Tailem Bend, S.A.
194 RECS, AUST. MUS., 18 (17): 385-413
Tetrameres calidris Mawson, 1968
Parasitology 58, p. 300
Holotype ¢ VI410 from Calidris canutus
Proventriculus: collected Casuarina Beach, N.T,
Paratypes AHC4491
Tetrameres cladorhyncht Mawson, 1968
Parasitology 58, p. 299-300.
Holotype 2, allotype ¢ V1413 from Chladorhynchus
leucocephalus
Proventriculus: collected St Kilda, Vic.
Paratypes AHC4514
Tetrameres dacelonis Mawson, 1979
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 103 (7), p. 180
Holotype ¢ V2685, allotype ? V2686 from Dacelo
novaeguinede
Proventriculus: collected Brisbane, Qld
Paratypes AHC6942
Tetrameres greeni Mawson, 1979
Trans. R. Soc. §. Aust. 103 (7), p. 180-2
Holotype ¢ V2683, allotype ? V2684 from Pelecanus
conspicillatas
Proventriculus: collected Temmink, Brisbane, Qld
Teirameres pelecani Johnston & Mawson, 1942
Trans. R. Soc. S, Aust. 66 (1), p. 72-3
Rec. S, Aust. Mus. 7 (2), p. 185-6
now Microtetrameres pelecani (Johnston & Mawson,
1942) Mawson, 1979
Holotype é V1416, allotype & (juvenile) V1417 from
Pelecanus conspicillatus
Plesiotype 2 V2719 as Microtetrameres pelecani
Trans, R. Soc. S. Aust. 103 (7), p. 178
Proventriculus: collected Brisbane, Qld and Tailem
Bend, S.A.
Tetrameres scolopacidis Mawson, 1968
Parasitology 58, p. 301-2
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1412 from Evolia acuminata
Proventriculus: collected Woods Well, S.A.
Spinitectus bancrofit Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Trans, R. Soc, S, Aust. 64 (2), p. 345-6
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1381 from Mogurnda adspersa
Intestine: collected upper Burnett R,, Qld
Spinitectus percalates Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Trans. R. Soc, S. Aust. 64 (2), p. 345
now Spinitectus plectroplites (Johnston & Mawson,
1940) Johnston & Mawson, 1947
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1382 from Percalales colan-
orum
Intestine: collected Lower Murray R., 8.A,
Note: A new collection from the type host contained
males of S. plectraplites not previously found and
additional females. Examination of this material
by the authors indicated that 8. percalates falls
as a synonym of S. plectroplites.
Spinitectus plectroplites Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 64 (2), p. 345
elpril, 1983
Holotype @ V1383 from Plectroplites ambiguus
Gill mucus: collected Tailem Bend, S.A,
Stellocaronema charadrti Mawson, 1968
Parasitology 58, p. 294-6
Holotype 4, allotype 2 VL468 from Charadrius cucul-
latus
Under gizzard lining: collected Beachport, 8.A-
Stellocaronemad glareolae Mawson, 1968
Parasitology 58, p. 296
Holotype 2 V1469 from Glareola isabella
Under gizzard lining; collected Pt Augusta, 5.A.
Paratypes AHC4498
Viguiera chabaudi Mawson, 968
Parasiiology 58, p. 761-2
Holotype 4, allotype 2? V1494 from Podargus strigaides
Under gizzard lining: collected Blackwood, $.A.
Viguiera chibiae Mawson, 1968
Parasitology 58, p. 763
Holotype @, allotype ? V1495 from Chibia bracteata
Under gizzard lining; collected Miiner’s Swamp, N.T.
Paratypes AHC4653
Vigniera longicollis Mawson, 1968
Parasitoloxy 58, p. 759-61
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1493 trom Collurincincla
rufiventris
Under gizzard lining: collected Eyre Peninsula, S.A.
Superfamily Heterakoidea
Heterakis catheturinae T. H. Johnston, 1912
Proc. R, Soc. Qld. 24, p. 73
from Catheturinus lathami
Caecum: collected Burnett R,, Qld
Paratypes AHC272
Superfamily Metastrongyloidea
Antechinostrongylus disgubernaculus Spratt, 1981
J. Parasit, 67 (1) p, 91
Holoyipe @ V2066, allotype 2 V2067 from Antechinus
swainsonil
Lung: collected Nadgee Nature Reserve, N.S. W,
Paratypes V2068
Filaroides (Filaroides) pilbarensis Spratt, 1979
Aust. J. Zool. Suppl. Ser. 67 (5), p, 8-11
Holotype ¢ V1570, allotype 2 V1571 from Anfechinus
rosamundae
Lungs: collected Woodstock Sth., W.A.
Paratypes ¥1572-80
Marsupostrongylus coulstoni Spratt, 1979
Aust. J. Zool. Suppl, Ser. 67, p. 16-18
Holotype 3 V1581, allotype 2 V1582 from Vombatus
Urslnus
Terminal bronchioles of lungs: collected Lucyvale,
Vic.
Paratypes V1 583-4
HELMINTH TYPE SPECIMENS IN THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM
Marsupostrongylus dorrigoensis Spratt, 1979
Aust. J. Zool. Suppl. Ser. 67, p. 19-2 |
Holotype ¢ V1585, allotype 2 V1586 from Thyplogale
thelis
Larger bronchioles of lung: collected Dorrigo, N.S.W.
Paratypes V1 587-94
Marsupostrongylus lancealatus Spratt, 1979
dust. J Zool. Suppl. Ser. 67, p. 25-28
Holotype 4 V1595, allotype ° V1596 from -tntechinus
Staarul
Terminal) bronchioles, alveoli, tung parenchyma: col-
lected Powelltown, Vic.
Paratypes V1597-8
Marsupostroigylus longilarvatus Spratt, 1979
Aust. J. Zool. Suppl. Ser. 67, p. 28-31
Holotype 3 V1599, allotype 2 V1600 from Wallabia
bicolor
Terminal bronchioles of lung: collected Bondi State
Forest, N.S,W.
Paratypes V1601-7
Marsupostrongylus riinesi Spratt, 1979
Aust. J. Zool. Suppl. Ser. 67, p. 31-34
Holotype 4 V1608, allotype 2 V1609 from Tricho
surus Ycaninus
Terminal bronchioles of lung: collected Mt Glorious,
Qld
Paratypes V1610-3
Parafilaroides hydrurgae Mawson, 1953
Parasitology 43 (304), p. 294
now Filaroides (Parajfilaroides) hydrurgae (Mawson,
1953) Anderson, 1978
Holotype 2 V2905 from Hydrurga leptonyx
Lung parenchyma: collected Heard Is,
Paratypes AHC3272
Superfamily Muspiceoidea
Durikainema macropi Spratt & Speare, (in press)
Holotype 2 V2849, allotype ¢ V2850 from Macropus
giganleus
Non-periferal blood: collected Durikai, Qld
Paratypes V2851-8
Riouxgolvania beveridgei Bain & Chabaud, 1979
Annales de Parasitol. 54 (2), p. 207-225
Holotype 2 V1915 from Minlopterus schreibersi
Wing membrane: collected Palluma Dam, 120k N of
Townsville, Qld
Superfamily Oxyuroidea
Aleuris brachylopi Johnston & Mawson, 1944
Trans, R. Soe. §. Aust. 68 (1), p. 61
Holotype 4, allotype @ V1271 from Brachylophus fas-
clalus
Intestine: collected Fiji
Austroxyuris finlaysoni Johnston & Mawson, 1938
Rec, 8. Aust. Mus. @ (2), p. 191-3
Holotype 2, allotype 2 V24 from Petauroides volans
var. puinor
Caecum: collected Fitzroy R., Qld
Macropoxyuris brevigularis Mawson, 1964
Parasitolagy 54, p. 257
Holotype 2 V2882, allotype 9 V2883 from Macropus
canguru
Lower intestine: collected Cunnamulla, Qld
Macropoxyuris longigularis Mawson, 1964
Parasitology 54, p, 253-6
Holotype 6 ¥2880, allotype 2 V2881 from Muacropus
canguru
Lower intestine: collected Cunnamulla, Qld
Oxyuris (8. 1.) acuticaudata Johnsten & Mawson,
1938
Rec, S. Aust. Mus. @ (2), p. 194
now Austroxyuris finlaysoni (Johnston & Mawson,
1938) Mawson, 1964
Holotype ? ¥28 from Petauroides voldans var. minor
Caecum and intestine: collected Fitzroy R., Qld
Oxvurts (8. 1.) potaroo Johnston & Mawson 1939
Trans. R. Soc, 8. Aust, 63 (2), p. 309
now Potoroxyuris poloroo (Johnston & Mawson, 1939)
Mawson, 1964
Holotype 2, allotype 4 V1375 from Potorous tridactylus
Intestine: collected Gippsland, Vic.
Note: re-examination of the onginal material by
Mawson revealed males which had not previously
been described.
Parathelandros oedurae Johnston & Mawson, 1947
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 71 (1), p. 25-6.
now Skrjabinodon oedurae (Johnston & Mawson,
1947) Inglis, 1968
Holotype 4 V1245, allotype 2 V1246 from Oedura
robusta
Large intestine: collected West Burleigh, Qld
Passalurus parvus Johnston & Mawson, 1938
Ree, S. Aust. Mus. 6 (2), p. 193
now Paraustroxyuris parvus (Johnston & Mawson,
1938) Mawson, 1964
Holotype 3 ¥25 from Petauroides volans vav. minor
Intestine: collected Fitzroy R., Qld
Pharyngodon kartana Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Rec, S. Aust. Mus. 7 (1), p. 145-6
Holotype 3, allotype ? V1260 from Gymnodacivlus
multi
Intestine: collected Kangaroo Is., S.A.
Paratypes AHC1655
Pharyngodon limnodynasies Johnston & Mawson,
1942
Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 67 (2), p. 94
Holotype % V1409 from Limnedynastes dorsalis
dumerilli
Intestine: collected Tailem Bend, S.A.
4396
Skrjabinodon smythi Angel & Mawson, 1968
Trans. R, Soc. S. Aust. 92, p. 69-70
Holotype 2 V2884, allotype 2 V2885 from Phyllodac-
tvlus marmoratus
Intestine: collected Port Gawler, S.A,
Paratype AHC8663
Syphacia trichosuri Johnston & Mawson, 1938
Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 6 (2), p. 194
now Adelonema trichosuri (Johnston & Mawson, 1938)
Mawson, 1978
Holotype 2 V29 from Trichosurus vulpecula
Allotype ¢ V3049 as Adelonema trichosuri
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 102 (8), p, 223
Intestine: collected West Burleigh, Qld
Thelandros kartana Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Rec, S. Aust. Mus. 7, p. 145
Holotype 3 V1248, allotype ¢ V1244 from Hemiergis
peront
Paratypes V1244
Intestine: collected Kangaroo Is., S.A.
Thelandros trachysauri Johnston & Mawson, 1947
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 71 (1), p. 24-5
Holotype @ V1242, allotype 2 V1243 from Trachysau-
rus rUROSUS
Intestine: collected Adelaide, S.A,
Superfamily Physalopteroidea
Bancroftinema dentatum Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Trans. R. Soc, S, Aust. 65 (1), p. 33-4
Holotype ? V1422 from Hieracidea berigora
Stomach: collected Eidsvold, Qid
Paraleptus australis Johnston & Mawson, 1943
Trans. R, Soc, S. Aust. 67 (2), p. 188
Holotype 3, allotype 2 V1290 from Heterodontus phi|-
lipi
Alimentary canal: collected Pt. Willunga, S.A.
Physaloptera banfieldi Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Ree. Aust, Mus. 21 (1), p. 11
from Melomys banjieldi
Stomach: collected Dunk Is., Qld
Paratypes AHC1664
Physaloptera confusa Johnston & Mawson, 1942
Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S, W. 67, p. 90-1
now Abbreviata conjusa (Johnston & Mawsen, 1942)
Chabaud & Bain, 1976
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1298 from Notechis scuratus
Stomach: collected Tailem Bend, S.A.
Physaloptera demansiae Johnston & Mawson, 1947
Ree. §. Aust. Mus. 9 (1), p. 105
now Abbreviata demansiae (Johnston & Mawson,
1947) Chabaud & Bain, 1976
Holotype 4 V2871, allotype ¢ V2872 from Demansia
psammaphis
Stomach: collected Sydney, N.S.W.
Paratypes V2903-4
REC. 5. AUST. MUS,, 18 (17); 385-413
April, [983
Physaloplera gallardi Johnston & Mawson, 1942
Ree, A, Mus, 21 (2), p. 114
now Abbreyiata gallardi (Johnston & Mawson, 1942)
Chabaud & Bain, 1976 from Amphiholurus bar-
batus
Intestine: collected Narrara, N.S.W.
Paratypes AHC2273
Physaloptera hieracideae Johnsion & Mawson, 1941
Trans, R. Soc. S. Aust. 65 (1), p. 31
Holotype 2 V1419 from Hieracidea orientalis
Gizzard: collected Flinders Is., Bass Strait,
Physaloptera papuensis Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Prac, Linn, soc. N.S. W. 65 (5-6), p, 475
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1278 from ? bandicoot
Stomach: collected Mt Lamington, Papua New Guinea
Physaloptera parvicollaris Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Proc. Linn. Soc, N.S.W. 65 (5-6), p. 474-5
Holotype 4, allotype 9 V1280 from Perameles nasuta
Stomach; collected Sydney, N.S.W.
Physaloptera peragale Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 64 (1), p. 100
Holotype 4, allotype ° V1578 from Peragale minor
Stomach: collected MacDonald Downs, N.T.
Paratypes AHC2664
Physalaptera sarcaphili Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Proc, Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 65 (5-6), p. 474
Holotype 3, allotype 9, V1279 from Surcophilus
harrisii
Stomach: collected Tas, Biol, Survey
Physaloptera thalacomys Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Proc. Linn, Soc. N.S, MW. 65 (5-6), p. 474
Holotype @, allotype 29 V1277 from Peragale minor
Stomach: collected MacDonald Downs, N.T.
Proleptus trygonorrhinae Johnsion & Mawson, 1943
Trans, R, Soc. 8. Aust. 67 (2), p, 187-8
Holotype 4, allotype 2? V1288 from Trigonorrhina
fasciala
Spiral valve; collected Pt. Willunga, S.A,
Proleptus urolophi Johnston & Mawson, 1951
Trans, R. Soe, S. Aust, 74 (1), p. 23
Holotype 4 V2926, allotype 2? V2927 tram Urolophus
testaceus
Spiral valve: collected Pt Jackson, N,S.W.
Skrjabinoplera — goldmanae = Mawson, 1970
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 94, p, 223-4
Holotype 2, allotype 2 V2811 from Amphibolurus bar-
hatus
Stomach: collected Cobar, N.S,W,
Superfamily Rhabditoidea
Rhabdias hylae Johnston & Simpson, 1943.
Trans, R. Soe. 8S. Aust. 66, p. 176-8
HELMINTH TYPE SPECIMENS IN THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM
Syntypes V2808 from Afv/a aurea
Lung: collected Sydney, N,S,W,
Superfamily Rictularioidea
Rictularia carstairsi Mawson, 1971
Trans. R. Soe. Aust. 95 (2), p, 61-3
Holotype 2 V2123, allotype 4 V2124 from Rattus
villosissimius
Duodenum and stomach; collected Brunette Downs
Stn., N.T.
Paratypes AHC5032
Rictularia mackerrasue Mawson, 1971
Trans. R. Soc, S. Aust. 95 (2), p. 63-4
Holotype 2 V1267 from Rattus fuscipes assimilis
Stomach: collected Innisfail, Qld
Rictularia pearsoni Mawson, 1971
Trans. R. Soc, S. Aust. 95 (3), p. 175-6
Allotype 2 V2870 from Rattus fuscipes murrayi
Stomach: collected Pearson Is,, S.A,
Rictularina spinosa Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Proc. Linn, Soc. N.S. 66, p, 254
Holotype 2? V1424 from Myiagra rubecula
Stomach: collected Stradbroke Is., Qid
Superfamily Seuratoidea
Cucullanus heterodonti Johnston & Mawson, 1943
Trans, R, Soe, 8, Aust, 67 (2), p. 187
Holotype 4, allotype @ V1291 from Heterondontus
phillips
Intestine: collected Port Willunga, §.A,
Cucullanellus enidglanis Johnston & Mawson, 1945
Trans. R. Soe. 8. Aust, 69 (1), p, 116
now Dichelyne (Cucullanellus) cnidglanis (Johnston
& Mawson, 1945) Petter, 1974
Holotype 4 V1249, allotype @ V1250 from Cnidoglanis
megastomus
Intestine: collected Port Willunga, S.A.
Cucullanellus sheardi Johnston & Mawson, 1944
Trans, R, Soe, 8S, Aust, 68 (1), p. 64
now Dichelyne (Cucullanellus) sheardi (Johnston &
Mawson, 1944) Petter, 1974
Holotype ¢ V1251, allotype 2? V1252 from Threpterius
maculasus
Intestine: collected Cape Borda, S.A.
Echinonema edmondsi Chabaud et al. 1980
Annales de Parasit, 55 (4), p. 433-5
Holotype 3 V2071, allotype 2 V2072 from Dasyurus
hallucatus
Stomach and small intestine: collected Cannon Hill,
N.T.
Paratypes V2073-91
Echinonema meridtonalis Chabaud et al, 1980
Annales de Parasit. $5 (4), p. 436-7 from fsoodon
obesulus
397
Alimentary canal: collected Waitpinga, 8,A,
Cotypes V2932 & AHC4460
Inglisonema typos Mawson, 1968
Parasitology 58, p. 71-3
Holotype 2, allotype 2 V1697 from FPitla versicolor
Stomach; collected Swainson, Qld
Paraseuratum tandani Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Trans. R, Sac. S. Aust. 64 (2), p. 347-8
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1389 from Tandanus tandanus
Alimentary canal: collected Tailem Bend, S.A,
Seuratinema hrevicaudatum Johnston & Mawson,
1941
Trans. R. Soc, S. Aust, 65 (1), p. 33
now Skrjabinura brevicaudatus (Johnston & Mawson,
1941)
Mawson, 1960
Holotype 6 V1685 from Ninox connivens
Alimentary canal; collected Burnett R., Qld
Seuratinema magnum Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Proc, Linn, Soc. N.S.W. 66 (3-4), p. 256
now Skrjabinura magnum (Johnston & Mawson,
1941) Mawson, 1960
Holotype 2? V1427 from Dacelo gigas
Alimentary canal: collected Pilliga Scrub, N.S.W,
Seuratinema pomatostomi Johnston & Mawson, 194|
Proc. Linn, Soc. N.S. W. 66 (3-4), p. 255-6
now Skrjabinura pomatostomi (Johnston & Mawson,
1941) Mawson, 1960
Holotype 2, allotype 9 V1428 from Poynatostomus
superciliosus
Alimentary canal; collected Baradine, N.S.W.
Seurechina chaneeti Chabaud et al, 1980
Annales de Parasit, 5§ (4), p, 429-31
Holotype 2? V2069, allotype ¢ V2070 from Dasyurus
hallucatus
Intestine: collected Koolan Is., W.A,
Superfamily Spiruroidea
Alainchabaudia alcedinis Mawson, 1968
Parasitolagy 58, p. 741-2
Holotype 2, allotype 9 V1488 from Halcyon sanctus
Gizzard: collected Brisbane, Qld
Cyathospirura dasyuridis Mawson, 1968
Parasitolagy 58, p. 77-8
Holotype 4, allotype ° V1508 from Dasyureps macu-
latus
Stomach: collected N.S.W.
Paratypes AHC5194
Gongylonema alecturae Johnston & Mawson, 1942
Prac. Linn, Soc. N.S. W’. 67 (1-2), p. 92-3
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1296 from Alectural latham/
No host site data: collected Eidsvold, Qld
398
Gongylonema. beveridgei Mawson, 197)
Trans. R.. Soc. 8. Aust. 95 (3), p- 176-7
Holotype 4 V2822, allotype 2 V2823 from Rattus
juscipes murrayi
Stomach: collected Pearson Is., §.A.
Paratypes AHC7799
Protospirura marsupialis Baylis, 1927
Rec. §. Aust, Mus. 6 (2), p. 190-1
Allotype 4 V30 (Johnston & Mawson, 1938) from
Trichosurus vulpecula
Stomach: collected Eidsvold, Qld
Superfamily Strongyloidea
Beveridgea corneri Mawson, |980
Trans. R. Soc. 8S. Aust. 104 (4), p. 81
Holotype 4, allotype 2 VI910 from Macropus agilis
Stomach: collected Elizabeth Downs, N.T,
Paratypes AHC7801
Buccosirongylus australis Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Trans. R, Soe, S, Aust, 63 (3), p, 142
Holotype 4, allotype 2 ¥1558 from Macropus wilcoxi
Stomach: collected Eidsvold, Qld
Buccostrongylus buccalis Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Trans. R, Soe, S. Aust. 63 (3), p. 141-2
Holotype 4, allotype 2? V1557 from Macropus dorsalis
Stomach: collected Upper Burnett District, Qld
Buccostrongylus labiatus Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Proc, Linn. Soc. N.S. W. 64 (5-6), p. 527
Holotype 4, allotype $ V1371 from Macropus ruficollis
Stomach; collected Bathurst district, N.S.W.
Paratypes AHC7291
Buccostrongylus setifer Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. W. 64 (5-6), p. 527-8
Holotype 2 V2815, allotype 2 V2816 from Macropus
ruficollis
Stomach: collected Bathurst, N.S.W.
Cassunema exigua Beveridge & Johnston, 1981
Systematic Parasit. 3, p. 78-80
Holotype é V1994, allotype 2 V1995 trom Thylogale
stigmatica
Stomach; collected Tolga, Qld
Paratypes V1996-05
Cloacina annulata Beveridge, 1979
J. Helminth. 53, p, 369-70
Holotype ¢ V1645, allotype 2 V1646 from W’allabia
hicolor
Stomach: collected Bellbird Ck., Vic.
Paratypes V1647-50
Cloacina australis Johnston & Mawson, 1938
Trans. R, Soe, 8. Aust, 62 (2), p. 275
now Cloacina daveyi (Johnston & Mawson, 1938)
Mawson, 1977
REC. S, AUST, MUS., 18 (17); 385-413
atpril, 1983
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1358 from Macropus robustus
Stomach: collected Mt Licbig, N.T-
Note! Mawson examined specimens identified as
AMacropostrongylus australis Yorke &
Maplestone, 1926 by Baylis (1934), She re-
described the species from this material and
additional specimens from the same host in
Papua. From Yorke & Maplestone’s figures A/,
australis appeared to be referable to Cloacina as
were the specimens identified by Baylis. As C.
australis (Yorke & Maplestone) predated C. aus-
tralis Johnston & Mawson, 1938 Mawson pro-
posed C. daveyi as the new name,
Cloacina bancrofterum Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Trans. R. Soc. S, Aust. 63 (3), p. 133
Holotype 4, allotype 2? V155! from Macropus dorsalis
Stomach; collected upper Burnett R., Qld
Cloacina burnetiiana Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Trans. R. Soc. §. Aust. 63 (3), p. 130-1
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1548 from Macropus dorsalis
Stomach: collected upper Burnett R., Qld
Cloacina castor Bevendge, 1979
J. Helminth, 53, p, 364-7
Holotype 3 V1651, allotype ? V1652 from Wa/labia
bicolor
Stomach: collected Teesdale, Vic,
Paratype V1653
Cloacina clarkae Mawson, 1972
Trans. R, Soe, S. Aust. 96 (2), p. 109-112
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1506 from Macropus eugenii
Stomach: collected Kangaroo Is., S.A.
Cloacina communis Johnston & Mawson, 1938
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 62 (2), p. 275-277
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1355 fram Macropus robustus
Stomach: collected Mt Liebig, N.T,
Paratypes AHC8143
Cloacina curta Johnston & Mawson, 1938
Trans. R. Soc. §, Aust, 62 (2), p. 279-280
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1354 from Macropus robustus
Stomach: collected Mt Liebig, N.T.
Cloacina digitata Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W’. 65 (5-6), p. 469
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1282 from Macropus dorsalis
Stomach: collected Burnett R., Qld
Cloacina dubia Johnston & Mawson, 1938
Trans. R. Soe, 5. Aust. 62 (2), p, 280-1
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1357 from Macropus rohustus
Stomach: collected Mt Liebig, N.T.
Cloacina edwardsi Mawsan, 1972
Trans, R. Soc. 8. Aust. 96 (2), p. 112
Holotype @, allotype ° V1507 from Wallahia bicolor
Stomach: collected Sunday I!s., Vic.
HELMINTH TYPE SPECIMENS IN THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 499
Claacina elegans Johnston & Mawson, 1938
Trans. &. Soc. S. Aust. 62 (2), p. 271-2
Holotype 4, allotype ? V1247 from Petrogale lateralis
Stomach: collected Hermansburg, N.T.
Cloacina ernabella Johnston & Mawson, 1938
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 62 (2), p, 281-2
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1351 from Petrogale lateralis
Stomach: collected Ernabella, 8.4,
Cloacina expansa Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 64 (5-6), p, 529
Holotype 4, allotype 9 V1564 from Macropus major
Stomach: collected Coonamble, N.S.W,
Cloacina frequens Johnston & Mawson, 1938
Trans. R. Soe. 8. Ausi. 62 (2), p, 273-4
Holotype 4, allotype 2. V1359 from Macrapus robustus
Stomach: collected Mt Liebig, N.T.
Cloacina gallardi Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Proc, Linn. Sac. N.S. W. 65 (5-6), p, 470
Holotype ¢, allotype 9 V1283 from Macropus
ualahatus
Stomach: collected Ourimbah, N.S.W.
Cloacina hydriformis Johnston & Mawson, 1938
Trans. R. Soc. 8. Aust. 62 (2), p. 273
Holotype 2, allotype 2 V1364 from Macropus robustus
Stomach: collected Mt Liebig, N.T.
Paratypes AHC1 841
Cloacina inflata Johnston & Mawson, 1938
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 62 (2), p, 285-6
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1353 from Mucropus rufis
Stomach: collected Mt Liebig, N,T.
Cloacina kartana Mawson, 1975
Trans. R. Soe. S. Aust. 99 (1), p. 40-1
Holotype 3, allotype 2? V1266 from Macrapus eugenii
Stomach: collected Kangaroo Is., S.A.
Paratypes AHC5829
Cloacina liebigi Johnston & Mawson, 1938
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust, 62 (2), p. 284-5
Holotype ¢, allotype 2 V1363 from Macropus rufus
“Stomach: collected Mt Liebig, N.T.
Cloacina linstowi Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Proc, Linn, Soc. N.S.W. 65 (5-6), p. 469-70
Holotype 4, allotype ? V1284 from Macropus ruficollis
Stomach: collected Burnett R,, Qld
Cloacina longispiculata Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 63 (3), p. 131-2
Holotype 4, allotype 9 V1550 from Macropus agilis
Stomach: collected Gregory R., Carpentaria District,
Qld
Cloacina macropodis Johnston & Mawson, 1938
Trans. R. Sav. S. Aust. 62 (2), p, 278-9
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1356 from Macropus robustus
Siomach. collected Mt Liebig, N.T.
Cloacina magna Johnston & Mawson, 1938
Trans. R. Sac, 8. Aust. 62 (2), p. 277
now C. cummunis (Johnston & Mawson, 1938) Maw-
son, 196]
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1362 from Macrapus robustus
Stomach: collected Cockatoo Ck,, N.T-
Cloacina magnipapillata Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Prac. Linn. Sac. N.S.W. 64 (5-6), p. 350
Holotype 2, allotype 2? V1566 from Macropus major
Stomach: collected Coonamble, N.S.W.
Cloacina mawsonae Beveridge, 1979
J. Helminth. 53, p. 364-7
Holotype ¢ V1619, allotype 2 V1620 from HWallabia
bicolor
Stomach: collected Bonang, Vic.
Paratypes V1621-4
Cloacina minor Johnston & Mawson, 1938
Trans, R, Soe. S, Aust, 62 (2), p. 283
now Cloacina longelabiata (Johnston & Mawson, | 938)
Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1360 from Macropus robusius
Stomach: collected Mt Liebig, N.T.
Note: the authors assignment of Macropostrogv/us
rilnor Davey & Wood, 1938 to Cloacina neces-
Sitated the renaming C. minor Johnston & Maw-
son
Cloacina mundayi Mawson, 1972
Trans. R. Soc. 8. Aust, 96 (2), p. 109
Holotype 3, allotype 2 V1505 fram Macrapus
rufogrisea
Stomach: collected Tarraleah, Tas,
Cloacina obtusa Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Proc. Linn. Soc, N.S.W. 64 (5-6). p. 530
Holotype ¢, allotype 2 V1565 from Macrapus major
Stomach: collected Coonamble, N.S.W.
Cloacina papillata Beveridge, 1979
J. Helminth, 53, p. 367-8
Holotype $ V1625, allotype 2 V1626 from Wallabia
bicolor
Stomach; collected Marlborough, Qld
Paratypes V1627-44
Cleacina parva Johnston & Mawson, 1938
Trans, R. Soc. 5. Aust, 95 (3), p. 171
from Petrogale pearsoni
Stomach: collected Pearson Is.
Paralypes AHC6983
Cloacina petrogale Johnston & Mawson, 1938
Trans. R. Soc, §, Aust. 62 (2), p, 277-8
Holotype é V2896, allotype 2 V2897 from Petroga/?
lateralis
Stomach: collected Mt Liebig, N-T.
Paratypes AHC1846
Cloacina pollux Beveridge, 1979
J, Helminth. 53, p. 375-6
400
Holotype ¢ V1654, allotype 2 V1655 from Wallabia
bicolor
Stomach: collected Townsville, Qld
Paratypes V 1656-70
Cloacina robertsi Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Trans, R, Soc, S, Aust. 63 (3), p. 129-30
Holotype @, allotype 2 VI547 from Petrogale
penicillata
Stomach: collected Upper Burnett R., Qld
Cloacina setonicis Mawson, 1961
Trans. R, Soc. S. Aust. 85, p. 81-2
Holotype 2 V2899, allotype 9 V2900 from Seionix
brachyurus
Stomach: collected Rottnest Is., W.A.
Paratypes AHC4532
Cloacina similis Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Trans. R. Soc. S, Aust, 63 (3), p, 131
Holotype 2, allotype 2 V1549 from Petrogale penicil-
lata
Stomach: collected Upper Burnett R., Qld
Cloacina smalesae Mawson, 1975
Trans. R, Soe, 8S, Aust. 99 (1), p. 39
Holotype 3, allotype 2 V1514 from Macropus eugenti
Stomach: collected Kangaroo Is., 8.A,
Paratypes AHC5605
Cloacina thetidis Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Proc, Linn. Soc. N.S. 4’, 64 (5-6), p, 532
Proc, Linn, Soc, N.S.W. 65 (5-6), p. 471
Holotype 2 V2877 from Macropus thetidis
Allotype é V1281 from Av. parma
Stomach: collected New England, N.S,W.
Ourimbah, N,S.W.
Cloacina vesiibulata Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Trans. R. Soe, S. Aust, 64 (1), p. 97
Holotype 2? V1379 from Macropus melanops
Stomach: collected Mundalla, S.A.
and
Cloacina wallabiae Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W’. 64 (5-6), p. 532
Holotype ¢@, allotype ¢@ VI567 from Macropus
ualahbatus
Stomach: collected Lower Hawkesbury, N.S.W.
Corallosirongylus hypsiprymnodontis Beveridge, 1978
J. Parasit. 64 (4), p. 657-9
Holotype 4 VIL83, allotype 2 V1184_ from
Hypsiprymnodon moschatus
Intestine: collected Boar Rocket Rd., via Atherton,
Qld
Paratype V1185-92
Coronostrongylus coronatus Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Trans. R, Soc. S. Aust. 63 (3), p. 145-6
Holotype 4 V1560, allotype 2 V1287 from Macropus
wilcaxt
Stomach; collected Eidsvold, Qld
REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (17): 385-413
April, 1Y83
Cyelostrongylus alatus Beveridge, 1982
Aust. J. Zool. Suppl. Ser. 83, p. 93-4
Holotype 2 V1768, allotype 2? V1769 from Macropus
rufogriseus banksianus
Oesophagus: collected Swanfels, Qld
Paratypes V1770-9
Cyclostrongvlus clelandi Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Proc. Linn. Sac. N.S.W. 64 (5-6), p. 518
now Alocostoma clelandi (Johnston & Mawson, 1939)
Mawson, 1979
Holotype 3, allotype ° V1696 from Afacropus major
Oesophagus: collected Coonamble, N.S.W-
Cyclostrongylus dissimilis Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. W. 64 (5-6), p. 519-20
now Macropostrongyloides dissimilis (Johnston &
Mawson, 1939) Mawson, 1977
Holotype & V2817 from Macropus ualabatus
Oesophagus: collected Milson Is., Lower Hawkesbury,
N.S.W,
Note: C. dissimilis originally described from a single
damaged male specimen, Mawson assigned the
species to Macropostrologyloides after examining
fresh material.
Cyclostrongylus elegans Beveridge, 1982
Aust. J. Zool, Suppl. Ser. 83, p. 97-8
Holotype 4 V1792, allotype 2 V1793 from Macropus
parryi
Oesophagus: collected Rivertree, N.S.W.
Paratypes V1794-03
Cyclostrongylus gallardi Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Proc, Linn. Soc. N.S. MW, 64 (5-6), p. 518
Holotype 4, allotype 9 V1561 from Afacropus ruficallts
Oesophagus: collected Ourimbah, Gosford District,
N.S.W.
Cyclostrongylus perplexus Beveridge, 1982
Aust. J. Zool, Suppl. Ser. 83, p. 89-90
Holotype ¢ V1780, allotype 9 V!78) from Macropus
rufogriseus banksianus
Oesophagus: collected Grampian Ra., Vic,
Paratypes V1782-91
Cyclostrongylus wallabiae Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. W. 64 (5-6), p. 517-8
Holotype 2 V2818, allotype 2 V2819 fram Macropus
ualabatus
Oesophagus: collected Lower Hawkesbury, N.S,W,
Paratypes AHC1672
Foliostoma macropodis Beveridge & Johnson, L98L
Systematic Parasit. 3, p. 84-5
Holotype 4 V2027, allotype ¢ V2028 from Thylogale
Stigmatica
Stomach: collected Tolga, Qld
Paratypes V2029-33
HELMINTH TYPE SPECIMENS IN THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM
Typedontis thetidis Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Proc. Linn. Soe. N.S. WW’, 64 (5-6), p, 534
now Hypodontis macropi (Johnston & Mawson, 1939)
Beveridge, 1979
Holotype 4 V1214, allotype 2 V1215 from Macropus
thetidis
Caccum; collected New England, N.S.W.
Paratypes V1220-3
Lahtostrongylus macropodis Johnston & Mawson,
1938
Trans: R. Sac. S. Aust. 62 (2), p. 266-7
Holotype 2 V2765 trom Afacropus pobustus
Stomach: collected Cockatoa Ck., N.T.
Lahiostrongylus petrogale Johnston & Mawson, 1938
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 62 (2), p. 270-1
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1367 from Petrogale lateralis
Stomach: collected Mt Licbig, N.T.
Macroponema beveridgei Mawson, 1978
Int. J. Parasitol. 8, p. 164-5
Holotype 4 V1154, allotype 9 V1155 fram Macropus
antilopinus
Stomach: collected Elizabeth Downs, N.T,
Paratypes AHC5999
Macropanema camani Mawson, 1978
Int. J. Parasitol, 8, p, 165-6
Holotype 6 V1156, allotype 2 V1157 from Macropus
giganteus
Stomach: collected Yan Yean, Vic,
Macropicola acydromi Mawson, 1978
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 102 (4), p, 113-5
Holotype 4, allatype 2 V1687 from Macropus fuligi-
nasus ocyvdronus
Large intestine: collected Albany, W.A.
Macropostrongyloides
Mawson, 1978
Aust, J, Zool. 26, p. 777-9
Holotype 4 V1301, allotype 2 V1302 from Macropus
fuliginesus melanops
Caecum: collected Pine Plains Stn via Patchewollock,
Vic,
vamaguiii Beveridge &
Muacraposirangylus dissimilis Johnston & Mawson,
1939
Proc, Linn. Soc. N.S. W. 64 (5-6), p. 526
now 4rundelia dissimilis (Johnston & Mawsan, 1939)
Mawson, 1977
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1563 from Macropus ualabatus
Stomach; collected Lower Hawkesbury, N.S.W.
Note: fresh collections of material from Wallabia
bicolor (type host) had more visible details of the
buccal capsule which allowed Mawson to amend
the original description.
Macropostrongylus irma Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Rec. Aust. Mus. 20 (5), p. 363
40
Holotype 3 V1671, allotype 2 V1672 from Wallalna
ira
Stomach: collected Cranbrook, W.A.
Cotypes AHCI816
Macropostrongylus pearsoni Johnston & Mawson.
1940
Trans. R. Sac. S. Aust. 64 (1), p, 98-9
now Popovastrongylus pearsoni (Johnston & Mawson,
1940) Mawson, 1977
Holotype é, allotype 2 V1377 from Petragale pearsoni
Stomach: collected Pearson Is,
Note: The original description was based on two spec-
imens, a male and a female. Additional collections
have provided material in better condition so
that Mawson was able to prepare a more detailed
description.
Macropostrongylus lesouefi Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Prac. Linn, Soc. N.S.W. 64 (5-6), p. 525
Holotype ¢ V2830, allotype 2 V2831 from Macropus
ruficollts
Stomach: collected Sydney Zool. Gardens
Macropostroneylus wallahiae Johnston & Mawsart,
1939
Proc. Linn, Soc. N.S. W. 64 (5-6), p. 525-6
now Popovastrongy his wallabiae (Johnston & Mawson,
1939) Mawson, 1977
Holotype 4, allotype ? V2832 from Maecropus riujicullis
Stomach: collected Bathurst, N.S.W.
Maplestonema typicum Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Proc. Linn, Soc. N.S.W. 64 (5-6), p. 524
Types V1562 from Mfacropus ualahatus
Stomach: collected Lower Hawkesbury, N.S.W.
Note; Subsequent finding of moulting larvae in new
collections of material showed that types. are lar-
val stages of a Cloacina species. Mawson, pers.
comm.
Monilonema lacunosa Beveridge & Johnson, 1981
Systematic Parasit, 3, p. 80-2
Holotype ¢ V2006, allotype 2 V2007 from Thylogale
suigmatica
Stomach: collected Mission Beach, Old
Paratypes V2008-26
Oesophagonastes leptos Mawson, 1965
Parasit. 55, p. 159
now Cyeclostrongylus leptos (Mawson, 1965) Mawson,
1977
Holotype é V1702, allotype 2 V1703 from Macropus
dorsalis
Oesophagus: collected Logan Village, Qld
Paratypes AHC6292
Note: Re-examination of type material by Mawson
revealed that the type species of Cyclosrrongylus
and Oesophagonastes are identical. Oesophagon:
astes thus became a synonym of Cyclostrongylus.
ml
402 REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (17): 385-413 April, 1983
Oesaphagostomoides longispicularis Beveridge, 1978
Aust, J. Zoal. 26, p. 599-602
Holotype ¢ V1 340, allotype 2 V1339 from Vombatus
ursinus
Colon: collected Darirnouth, Vic.
Paratypes V1341]
Papillastrongylus labiatus Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Trans, R. Sac. S. Aust. 63 (3), p, 143-4
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1559 from Macropus dorsalis
Stomach; collected Eidsvold, Qld
Paramacropostrongylus toraliformis Beveridge &
Mawson, 1978
Aus) J. Zool. 26, p. 783-6
Holotype ¢ V1299, allotype ¢ V1300 from Macropus
giganteus
Caecum: collected Yan Yean, Vic-
Paramacropostrongvlus typicus Johnston & Mawsan,
1940
Trans. R. Soc. §, Aust, 64 (1), p. 98
Holotype 4, allotype @.V1376 from Macropus melanops
Stomach: collected Mundulla, $.A.
Parapharyngostrongylus dentatus Beveridge, L982
Aust. J. Zool. Suppl. Ser. 83, p. 46-7
Holotype ¢ V2167, allotype 2 V2168 from Macropus
dorsalis
Stomach: collected Emu Park, Qld
Paratypes V2| 69-78
Pararugopharynx protodemnodontis Magzoub, 1964
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 88, p. 50-1
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1265 from Protonemnodon
rilfogrisea
Oesophagus and stomach: collected Logan Village,
Qld
Paratypes AHC4918
Parazoniolaimus collaris Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 64 (5-6), p. 522-4
Holotype 3, allotype 2 V1372 from Macropus ualabatus
Stomach; collected Lower Hawkesbury, N.S.W,
Pharyngostrongylus alpha Johnston & Mawsan, 1938
Trans. R, Soc, S. Aust. 62 (2), p. 264-6
now Rugopharynx australis (Moiinig, 1926) Mawson,
1964
Holotype 4, allotype 9 V1365 from Macropus rufus
Stomach: collected Mt Liebig, N.T.
Pharyngastrongylus beta Johnston & Mawson, 1938
Trans. R, Soc. S. Aust. 62 (2), p. 266
now Rugopharyax australis (Moiinig, 1926) Mawson,
1964
Holotype @, allotype 2 V1366 from Macropus rufus
Stomach: collected Mt Liebig, NT.
Pharyngostrongylus delta Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 63 (3), p. 136
now Rugopharynx delta (Johnston & Mawson, 1939)
Yamaguti, 1961
Holotype 4, allotype 2? V1553 from Macropus dorsalis
Stomach: collected Upper Burnett R., Qld
Pharyngostrongylus dendrolagi Beveridge, 1982
Aust. J. Zool. Suppl. Ser. 83, p. 31-2
from Dendrolagus dorianus
Stomach: collected Lumusa, P.N.G,
Paratypes V1819-20
|
Pharyngosirongylus diversus Beveridge, 1982
Aust. J. Zool. Suppl. Ser. 83, p. 22-4
Holotype é V1704, allotype 2 V1705 from Macropus
parma
Stomach: collected Niagara Park, N.S.W-
Paratypes V1706-13 & AHC7624
Pharyngosirongylus epsilon Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Trans. R, Soc, S. Aust. 63 (3), p. 137-8
now Rugopharynx epsilon (Johnston & Mawson, 1939)
Yamaguti, 196]
Holotype 3, allotype 2? V1554 from Macrapus dorsalis
Stomach: collected Eidsvald, Qld
Pharyngostrongylus eta Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Trans. R. Soc. S, Aust. 63 (3), p. 139-40
Holotype 4, allotype 2? V1556 from Macropus sp.
Stomach: collected Millmerran, Darling Downs. Qld
Paratypes AHC2568
Pharyngostrongylus gamma Johnston & Mawson,
L939
Trans. R. Soc. §. Aust. 63 (3), p. 134-6
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1552 from Macropus dorsalis
Stomach: collected Upper Burnett R., Qld
Pharyngastrongylus iota Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. 64 (5-6), p. 514-5
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V 1369 from Macropus ruficollis
Stomach: collected Ourimbah, Gosford District,
N.S. W.
Pharyngostrongylus kappa Mawson, 1965
Parasitology 55, p. 147-50
Holotype é V1700, allotype 2? V1701 from Macropus
canguru
Stomach: collected Inglewood, Qld
Pharyngostrongylus lambda Mawson, 1965
Parasitology 55, p, 151-2)
Holotype 3, allotype 2 V1698-9 from Macropus robus-
tus
Stomach: collected Marble Bar, W.A.
Paratypes AHC6289, Syntypes AHC7226
Pharyngostrongylus nelsoni Beveridge. 1982
Aust. J. Zool. Suppl. Ser. 83, p. 19-22
Holotype 4 V1726, allotype 2 V1727 from Petrogale
venustula
Stomach: collected Mt Borrodaile. N.T.
Paratypes V 1728-47
Pharyngostrongylus parma Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Proe. Linn. Soc. N.S G4 (5-6), p. 516
HELMINTH TYPE SPECIMENS IN THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM
now C'yclostrangylus parma (Johnston & Mawson,
1939) Mawson, 1977 from Mucropus parma
Oesophagus: collected Narara, Gosford District,
NLS.W.
Paratypes AHC1827
Pharyngostrongylus papillatus Beveridge, 1982
Aust. J. Zool. Suppl. Ser. 83, p. 17-9
Holotype ¢ V1714, allotype 2 V1715 from Macropus
antilopinus
Stomach: collected 80 km S.W, of Darwin, N.T.
Paratypes V1716-25 & AHC7612
Pharyngostrongylus setosus Beveridge, 1982
Aust. J. Zool. Suppl. Ser. 83, p. 44-5
Holotype 4 V1748, allotype ¢ V1749 from Thylogale
Stigmatica
Stomach: collected El Arish, Qld
Paratypes V1750-7
Pharyngostrongvlus sharmani Beveridge, 1982
Aust. J. Zool. Suppl. Ser. 83, p. 32-4
Holotype 2 V2139, allotype 2 V2140 from Macropus
hernardus
Stomach: collected El Sharana, N.T.
Paratypes V2141-60
Pharyngostrongylus theta Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Prac, Linn, Soc. NSW. 64 (5-6), p. 514
now Rugopharynx theta (Johnston & Mawson, 1939)
Yamaguti, 1961
Holotype 4, allotype 2? V1368 from Macropus thetidis
Stomach: collected New England, N.S.W.
Pharyngostrongylus zeta Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Trans. R. Soe. S. Aust, 63 (3), p. 138-9
now Rugopharynx zeta (Johnston & Mawson, 1939)
Yamaguti, 196)
Holotype 4, allotype 9 V1555 from Petragale penicil-
lata
Stomach: collected Upper Burnett R., Qld
Phascolostrongylus stirtont Mawson, 1955
Trans, R. Soc. S. Aust. ‘78, p. 5-6
now Oesophagostomoides stirtont (Mawson, 1955)
Beveridge, 1978 from Lasiorhinus latifrons
Colon; collected Blanchetown, §.A-
Syntype 2 V2812
Popovastrongylus irma, Mawson, 1977
Trans. R. Soe. 8S. Aust. 11 (2), p, 57-8
Holotype é V1671, allotype 2 V1672 from Macropus
irma
Stomach: collected Perth, W.A.
Potorostrongylus finlaysoni Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Trans. R. Soc, 8S. Aust. 63 (2), p. 308-9
Holotype ¢, allotype 2 V1374 from Potorous tridactylus
Intestine: collected S. Gippsland, Vic.
Potorastrongylus aepyprymnus Mawson, 1974
Trans. R. Sac, 8. Aust. 98 (3), p. 137
403
Holotype 6 V1692, allotype 2 V1693 from 4epyprym-
nus rufescens
Stomach: collected Warwick, Old
Paratypes AHC5811
Rugopharynx omega Beveridge, |982
Aust. J. Zool. Suppl. Ser, 83, p, 69-71
Holotype 2 V1758, allotype 2 V1759 from Macrupus
rufogrieseus banksianus
Stomach: collected Warwick, Qld
Paratypes V1760-7
Rugopharynx rosemariae Beveridge & Presidente,
1978
Int. J. Parasitol. 8, p. 379-84
Holotype 3 V1193, allotype 2 V1194 from Macropus
giganteus
Stomach: collected Dartmouth, Vic.
Paratypes V1195-1206
Rugopharynx rufogrisea Magzoub, 1964
Trans. R, Soe. §. Aust. 88, p. 49-50
Holotype ¢, allotype 2 V1264 from Protodemmnon rufo-
grisea
Stomach: collected Logan Village, Qld
Paratypes AHC4917
Spirestrongylus kartana Mawson, |955
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aus. 78, p. 2
now Cyelostrongylus kartana (Mawson, 1955) Maw-
son, 1977
Holotype 6 V2886, allotype 2 YV2887 from Macropus
eugenil
Oesophagus: collected Kangaroo Is., $.A.
Paratypes AHC70
Spirostrongylus spirostrongylus Yorke & Maplestonc,
1926
Nematode Parasites of Vertebrates, p. 68
from Macropus agilis
Oesophagus: Qld, probably Townsville
Syntypes AN.C8660
Thylonema arundel Beveridge, 1981
J. Parasit. 67 (1), p. 103-5
Holotype @ V2042, allotype 2 V2043 from Thylogale
stigmatica
Stomach: collected E] Arish, Qld
Paratypes V2044-55
Thylanema barkeri Beveridge, 1981
J. Parasit. 67 (1), p. 105-7
Holotype 3 V1982, allotype 2 V1983 from Thy/ogule:
sugmatica
Stomach: collected Mission Beach, Qld
Paratypes V1984-93
Thylonema thylonema Beveridge. 1981
J, Parasit 67 (1), p. 101-3
Holotype 4 V2034, allotype 2 V2035 from Thrlogale
stigmatica
Stomach: collected Mission Beach, Qld
Paratypes V2036-4]
44
Thvlostrongvlus parvus Beveridge, 1982
etust. J. Zool. Suppl. Ser. 83, p. 53-4
Holatype ¢ Vi804, allotype ¢ V1805 from Thylogale
thetis
Stomach: collected Emu Vale, Qld
Paratypes V1806-15
Thylostrongylus tasmaniensis Beveridge, 1982
Ausi. J. Zool, Suppl. Ser. 83, p. 53-4
Holotype 4 V2161, allotype 2 V2162 from Thylogale
hillardierti
Stomach: collected Golconda, Tas.
Paratypes V2163-6
Trigonostonema longibursata Beveridge, 1981
J. Parasit 67 (1), p. 95-7
Holotype 4 V2059, allotype 2 V2060 from Thylogale
stigmatica
Siomach: collected Tolga, Qld
Paratypes V2061-5
Trigonostonema trigonostoma Beveridge, 1981
J. Parasit 67 (1), p. 94-5
Holotype 2 V2056, allotype 2 V2057 from Thy/logale
stigmatica
Stomach: collected Mission Beach, Qld
Paratypes V2058
Hvodwardostrongylus obendorfi Mawson, 1976
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 100 (3), p. 121-123
Holotype 2 V1694, allotype 2 V1695 from Macropus
parry't
Ocsophagus: collected Dorrigo, N.S.W,
Zoniolaimus hancrofii Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Trans. R. Soe. §. Aust, 63 (3), p. 123-4
now Lubiastongylus bancrofti (Johnston & Mawson,
1939) Kung, 1948
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1541 from Macropus parry!
Stomach: collected Eidsvold, Qld
Zoniolaimus hipapillosus Johnston & Mawson, |939
Trans. R. Soc, S. Aust. 63 (3), p. 125
now Labiostroneylus bipapillosus (Johnston & Maw-
son, 1939) Kung, 1948
Holotype 2, allatype 2 V1542 from Macropits major
Stomach: collected upper Dawson Valley, Qld
Zoniolaimus clelandi Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Prac, Linn. Soc. N.S. W. 64 (5-6), p. 521
now Labiostrongylus clelandi (Johnston & Mawson,
1939) Kung. 1948
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1686
Stomach; collected Lower Hawkesbury, N.S.W.
Zoniolaimus communis Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Trans. R. Soe. 8. Aust. 63 (3), p. 125-6
now Labiostrongylus compiunts (Johnston & Mawson,
1939) Kung, 1948
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1543 from Macropus ualabatus
Stomach: collected upper Burnett R,, Qld
REC. S, AUST, MUS., 18 (17): 385-413
innit, LIAS
Zoniolaimus insularis Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Trans, R. Soe. 8. Aust. 63 (3), p. 126-7
now Labiostrangylus insularts (Johnston & Mawson,
1939) Kung, 1948
Holotype 2, allotype 2 V1544 from Macropus welsbyi
Stomach: collected Stradbroke Is.
Zoniolaimus onychogale Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 63 (3), p. 128
now Labiostrongylus onychogale (Johnston & Maw-
son, 1939) Kung, 1948
Holotype 2, allotype 2 V1546 from Onychogale frenata
Stomach: collected Upper Burnett R., Qld
Zoniolaimus ualabatus Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. W, 64 (5-6), p. 521-2
now Labiastrongylus ualabatus (Johnston & Mawson,
1939) Kung, 1948
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1614 from Macropus ualabatus
Stomach: collected Lower Hawkesbury, N,S,W.
Zoniolaimus uncinatus Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Trans. R. Soe. S. Aust. 63 (3), p. 127-8
now Lubiostrongy/us uncinatus (Johnston & Mawson,
1939) Kung, 1948
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1545 from Macropus dorsalis
Stomach: collected Upper Burnett R., Qld
Family Strongyloididae
Parastrongyloides australis Mawson, 1960
aust. J, Zoal. 8 (2), p. 281-2
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1459 from Jsoodon obesulus
Intestine: collected Cherry Gardens, 5,A.
Parustrongyloides peramelis Mackerras, 1959
Aust. J. Zoal. 7 (2), p. 99
from Thylacis obesulus
Small intestine: collected Mt Glorious, Qld
Paratypes AHC3886
Parustrongyloides trichosuri Mackerras, 1959
Aust. J. Zool, 7 (2) p. 96-9
from Trichosurus vulpecula
Small intestine: collected Brisbane, Qld
Paratypes AHC3888
Strongyloides. thylacis Mackerras, 1959
Aust. J. Zool, 7 (2), p. 88-96
from Thylacis obesulus
Small intestine: collected Brisbane, Qld
Paratypes AHC3887
Superfamily Subuluroidea
Lahiobulura baylisi Mawson, 1960
Aust. J. Zool. & (2), p. 279-80
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1464 from /seodon obesulus
Alimentary canal: collected Mt. Nebo, Qld
Paratypes AHC3285
HELMINTH TYPE SPECIMENS IN THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM
Labiolulura inglisi Mawson, 1960
Aust. J, Zool. 8 (2), p. 280-1
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1462 from Isvodon obesulus
Alimentary canal: collected Cherry Gardens, S.A.
Paratypes AHC3346
Leipoanema ellisi Johnston & Mawson, 1942
Trans, R, Soe. S. Aust. 66 (1), p. 73
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1292 from Leipoa vcellata
Intestine: collected Tailem Bend, §,A,
Paratypes AHC146, 308
Subulura clelandi Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Proc. Link. Soc. N.S. W. 66 (3-4), p, 251
Holotype 4, allotype 2? V1430 from Podargus strigoides
Intestine; collected Perth, W,A,
Subulura peragale Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Proc. Linh. Soc. N.S.W. 65 (5-6), p. 472-3
now Labiobulura peragale (Johnston & Mawson, 1940)
Mawson, 1960
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1276 trom Peragale minor
Stomach: collected MacDonald Downs, N,T,
Superfamily Thelazoidea
Metathelazia naghiensis Spratt, 1980
J. Parasit. 66 (6), p. 1032-35
Holotype ¢ V1821, allotype 2 V1822 from Perameles
nasuta
Lung parenchyma: collected Nadgee State Forest,
N.S,W,
Paratypes V1823-30
Oxyspirura bancrofti Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Proc. Linn, Soe. N.S.W. 66 (3-4), p. 255
Holotype ? 1423 from Philemon citreogularis
Orbit: collected Eidsvold, Qld
Rhahbdochona jJaenschi Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Trans, R. Soe. 8. Aust. 64 (2), p. 348
Holotype 3, allotype @ V1390 from Psendaphritis
urvillei
Intestine: collected Tailem Bend, S.A.
Thelazia pittae Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 65 (2), p. 256
Holotype 2, allotype 2 V1449 trom Pitta macklotti
2Orbit; collected North Qld
Superfamily Trichostrongyloidea
Amidastomum biziuriae Johnston & Mawson, 1947
Ree. S. Aust. Mus. 8 (4), p. 551
Holotype 3 V1259, allotype 2 V2878 from Biziura
lohata
Trans. R. Soe. S. Aust, 82, p. 152-3
Gizzard: collected Tailem Bend and Purnong, S.A.
Amidostamum tribonyx Mawson, 1980
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 104 (1), p. 10-12
Holotype 4 V1864, allotype 2? V1865 from Tribonvx
ventralis
405
Gizzard: collected Swan Reach, S.A.
Paratypes AHC6833
Amphibiophilus egerniae Johnston & Mawson, 1947
Trans. R. Soe, S. Ausl. 71 (1), p. 23 from genta
dahli
Intestine: collected ltari Rocks, Musgrave Ranges,
S.A,
Topotype 2 V2901, 2 V2902
Amphicephaloides thylogale Beveridge, 1979
Aust. J. Z00l. 27, p, 169-74
Holotype é V1470, allotype 2? V1471 from Thylovale
billardierii
Duodenumi: collected Launceston, Tas.
Paratypes V 1472-80
Asymimetracantha tasmaniensis Mawson, 1960
Aust. J. Zool. 8 (2), p. 273-6
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1460 from Isoodon obesulus
Small intestine: collected Dunorlan. Tas.
Paratypes AHC3334
dAustroheligmonema magna Mawson, 1961
Aust, J, Zool. 9 (5), p. 815-17
now Nippostrongylus magnus (Mawson, 1961) Dur-
ette-Desset. 1970
Holotype 3, allotype 2 V1330 from Rairus assimilis
Intestine: collected Innisfail, Old
Paratypes AHC3851
Austroheligmonema typicum Mawson, 1961
Aust. J. Zool. 9 (5), p. 815-7
now Nippostrongylus typicus (Mawson, 1961) Durette-
Desset, 1970
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1329 from Ratins assinwills
Intestine; collected Mt Nebo, Qld
Paratypes AHC3852
Austrostrongylus acinocercus Mawson, 1960
Aust. J. Zool. & (2), p. 265-7
now }Woolleya acinacercus (Mawson, |960) Mawson,
1973
Holotype 4, allotype ° V1463 from Perameles nasuta
Intestine: collected Innisfail, Qld
Paratypes AHC3350
Austrostrongylus aggregatus Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Prov. Linn, Soc. N.S.W’. 68 (5-6), p, 472
Holotype 4 V2890, allotype 2 V2891 from Macrapus
ualabatus
Intestine: collected Milson J., N.S.W,
Austrostrangylus chandleri Mawson, 1973
Trans, R. Soc. S. Aust, 97 (4), p. 262-5
Holotype 4, allotype ¢ V1516 from Macrapus rufon
griseus
Intestine: collected Bathurst, N.S.W.
Austrostrongylus hvdromyos Mawson, 1961]
Aust. J. Zool. 9 (5), p. 822-3
now Woolleya hvdromyas (Mawson, 1961) Mawson,
1973
406
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1333 from Aydromys vhry-
sogaster
Intestine; collected Innisfail, Qld
Paratypes AHC3857
Austrostroneylus hypsiprymnodontis Mawson, 1973
Trans. R. Sac, S. Aust. 97 (4), p. 265
Holotype 2, allotype ? VIS17 from Hypsiprymnodon
mroschatus
Intestine: collected Qld
Paratypes AHCS449
dustrostrongylus minulus Johnston & Mawson, 1938
Rec, &. Aust. Mus, 6 (2), p. 195
Holatype 4, allotype 9 V26 from Macropus dorsalis
Intestine: collected Eidsvold, Qld
Atustrostrangylus paralypicus Mawson, 1973
Trans. R. Soe. 8. Aust. 97 (4), p. 262
Holotype 4, allotype ? VI515 from Macropus rufo-
Briseus
[ntestine: collected Bathurst, N.S.W,
Austrostrongylus poteroo Johnston & Mawson, 1949
Trans. R. Soe, 8. Aust, 73, p. 64-5
now Paraustostroneylus potoroo (Johnston & Mawson,
1949) Mawson, 1973
Holotype ¢ V2820, allotype 2 V2821 from Potarous
tridactylis
Intestine; collected King Is., Tas,
Paratypes AHC7796, 6040
Austrostrangvlus thylogale Joinston & Mawson, 1940
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 64 (1), p. 99
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1373 trom Thylogale eugenii
Intestine: collected Kangaroo Is,, S.A,
Austrostrongylus wallabiae Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Proc, Linn. Sac. NSW. 64 (35-6), p. 534
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1370 from Macropus ruficollis
Intestine: collected Bathurst, N.S.W.
Beveridgiella pearsoni Humphery-Smith, 1980
Bull. Mus. nain. Hist. nat., Paris Ser 4 2 A (4),
1003-6
from Isnodon macrourus
Intestine: collected Townsville, Qld
Paratypes V2701
Copemania ohendorfi Durette-Desset & Beveridge,
L981
Annal, Parasit. (Paris) 56 (1), p. 63-6
from Dasyurus maculatus
Intestine: collected Warmambool, Vic.
Cotypes V2690, 269]
Dessetostrongvlus moorhousei Humphery-Smith, 1980
Bull. Mus. nam. Hist, nat., Paris Ser 4 2 A (4),
p. LOO7-8
from Antechinus swainsonit
Intestine: collected Nadgee, N.S.W.
Paratypes V2702-9
REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (17): 385-413
April, L983
Desyetostrangylus maudii Aumphery-Smith, 1980 Bull.
Mus. natn. Hist. Nat. Paris Ser 4 2 A (4) p. 1008-
LO
trom ntechinus swainsonil
Intestine: collected Nadgee, N.S.W.
Paratypes V2710-8
Filarinema peramelis Johnston & Mawsan, 1938
Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 6 (2), p. 196-7
now Mackerrostrongylus peramelis (Johnston &
Mawson, 1938) Mawson, 1960
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V27 from [savdon obesulus
Intestine: collected West Burleigh, Qld
Globocephaloides affinis Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 63 (3), p, 147-8
now Globocephaloides macropedis Yorke &
Maplestone, 1926 after Beveridge, 1979
Holotype 2? V1216 from Macropus dorsalis
Intestine: collected Eidsvold, Qld
Paratype 2 V1219
Globocephaloides thetidis Johnston & Mawson, 1939
Proc. Linn. Soc, N.S.W. 64 (5-6), p. 533
now Globocephaloides macropodis Yorke &
Maplestone, 1926 after Beveridge, 1979
Holotype 3 V1218, allotype 2 V1285 from Thylogale
thetis
Intestine: collected New England, N.S.W.
Note: type material for Globocephaloides wallabiae
Johnston & Mawson, 1939 is missing, presumed
lost. Beveridge (1979) has also put this species
as a synonym of Globocephaloides macropodis
Yorke & Maplestone, 1926.
Heligmonaides emanuelae Mawson, 1961
Aust. J. Zool. 9 (5), p. 809-10
now QOdilia emanuelae (Mawson, 1961) Durette-
Desset, 1973
Holotype 4, allotype ? V1332 from Rattus conatus
Intestine: collected Innisfail, Qld
Heligmonoides mackerrasae Mawson, 1961
Aust. J, Zoal. 9 (5), p. 808-9
now QOdilia emanuelae (Mawson,
Desset, 1973
Holotype 2 allotype 2 V1331 from Melomys cervinipes
Stomach and intestine: collected Innisfail, Qld
Paratypes AHC3860
Hepatojarakus fasciatus Mawson, 1961
Aust. J, Zool. 9 (5), p. 822
Holotype 3, allotype 2 V1335 from Raltus conatus
Abdominal mesentery; collected Innisfail, Qld
1961) Durette-
Hepatojarakus pycnofasciatus Mawson, 1961
Aust. J. Zool. 9 (5), p. 821-2
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1336 from Rattus assimilis
Liver and small intestine: collected Innisfail, Qld
Paratypes AHC3856
Ichthostrongylus clelandi Mawson, 1954
Trans, R. Soc. §. Aust. 77, p. 162-3
HELMINTH TYPE SPECIMENS IN THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM
Holotype 2 V2888, allotype 2? V2889 from Enilssola
antarclica
Spiral valve: collected Encounter Bay, S.A.
Paratypes AHC1412, 8602, 8603
Longisiriata brachybursa Mawson, 1961
Aust, J, Zool, 9 (5), p. 805-6
now Odilia brachybursa (Mawson, 1961) Durette-
Desset, 1973
Holotype 2, allotype 2° V1327 from Melomys cervinipes
Intestine; collected Innisfail, Old
Paratypes AHC3862
Longistriata melomyos Mawson, 1961
Aust. J. Zool. 9 (5), p, 801-4
now Odilia melamyos (Mawson, 1961) Durette-Desset,
1973
Holoytpe 4, allotype 2 V1328 from Melanomys cer-
VIMIpes
Intestine: collected Innisfail, Qld
Paratypes AHC3861
Longistriata polyrhahdole Mawson, 1961
Aust. J. Zoul. 9 (5), p. 807
now Qdilia polyrhabdote (Mawson, 1961) Durette-
Desset, 1973
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1325 from Rartus assimilis
Intestine: callected. Mt Glorious, Old
Paratypes AHC3854
Longistriata uromyos Mawson, 1961
Aust. J. Zool. 9 (5), p. 804-5
now Odilia uramyos (Mawson, 1961) Durette-Desset,
1973
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1326 from Uramys caudi-
maculatus
Intestine; collected Innisfail, Qld
Paratypes AHC3858
Mackerrastrongylus isoodon Durette-Desset &
Cassone, 1980
Bull. Mus, natn. Hist. nat. Paris Ser 42 A (4), p. 946-
8
Holotype 4 V2699, allotype 2 V2700 from Isoodon
macrourus
Intestine: collected Townsville, Qld
Mastonema melomyos, Mawson, 1961
Aust. J, Zool, 9 (5), p. 818-9
now AMfammanidula melomyos (Mawson,
Durette-Desset, 197]
Holotype ¢, allotype 2 V1334 from Melomys lutillus
Mammary gland: collected Whyanbeel, Qld
Paratypes AHC3859
1961)
Nicallina phascogale Mawson, 1960
Parasitology 50, p. 425-6
now Patricialina phascogale (Mawson, 1960) Inglis,
1968
Holotype 4, allotype 2? V1457 from Phascogale flavipes
Small intestine; collected Innisfail, Qld
Paratypes AHC3337
a07
Nicollina antechini Beveridge & Barker, 1975
J. Parasitolagy V61 (3), p. 489-93
Nasal cavity: collected Powelltown, Vic.
Paratypes V53
Nicollina baylisi Mawson, 1973
Trans. R. Soe, §. Aust. 97 (4), p. 270
Holotype ¢, allotype ? V1269 from Tachyglossus acu-
leatus
Small intestine: collected Tas,
Paratypes AHC5459
Nicollina calabyi (Mawson, 1973)
Trans. R, Soe, 8, Aust. 97 (4), p. 273
now Beveridgiella calabyi (Mawson, 1973) Humphery-
Smith, 1980
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1270 from Myrmecobius fas-
claus
Small intestine: collected W.A.
Nicallina cameroni Thomas, 1959
Trans. R. Soc. 8S. Aust. 82, p. 154-5
Holotype ¢ V2873, allotype ? V2874 from Tachyglos-
sus aculeatus
Small intestine collected Kangaroo Is., S.A.
Paratypes AHC829
Note: This species was described in the only paper in
which Mrs Thomas accidentally did not retain
use of the name Mawson.
Nicollina inglisi Mawson, 1973
Trans, R, Soc. 8. Aust. 97 (4), p. 273
now Beveridgiella inglisi (Mawson, 1973) Humphery-
Smith, 1980
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1520 from Myrmecohiuy fas-
claus
Small intestine: collected W, A,
Nicollina fota Mawson, 1960
Aust. J. Zool, & (2), p. 264-5
now Beveridgiella tora (Mawson, 1960) Humphery-
Smith, 1980
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1465 from /soodon obesu/ts
Small intestine: collected Dunorlan, Tas.
Nicollina mundayi Mawson, 1973
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust, 97 (4), p. 270-3
Holotype 2, allotype 2? V1519 from Yachyglossus acu-
leatus
Small intestine: collected Tas..
Paratypes AHC58
Oswaldocruzia limnodyaastes Johnston & Simpson,
1943
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 66, p, 172
Holotype 2, allotype 2 V1274 from Limnodynasies
dorsalis
Intestine: collected Adelaide, S.A.
Paratypes AHC2363
408
Paraustrostrongylus bettongia Mawson, 1973
Trans. R. Soc: S, Aust. 97 (4), p. 267
Holotype 2, allotype 2 V1518 from Bettongia gaimardi
Intestine: collected Tas.
Paratypes AHC5415
Paraustrostrongvlus trichosuri Mawson, 1973
Trans. R. Soe. S. Aust, 97 (4), p. 267-8
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1407 from Trichosurus vul-
pecula
Intestine: collected D'Aiguillar, Qld.
Paratypes AHC5443
Paraustrosirongylus ratti Obendorf, 1979
dust, J. Zool, 27 (2), p. 867-9
Holotype 3 V810, allotype V811 from Raitus fuscipes
Intestine: collected Gladysvale, Vic.
Paratypes V812-3
Patricialina birdi Humphery-Smith & Durette Desset,
1981
Bull. Mus. natn. Ilist. nat., Paris, Ser 4.3 A (1), p.
128-30,
Holotype 4 V2721, allotype 2 V2722 from Antechinus
swainsonit
Intestine: collected Nadgee, N.S.W-
Peramelistrongvlus skedastos Mawson, 1960
Aust. J. Zool. 8 (2), p. 268-71
Holotype ¢, allotype 2? V1461 from Isoadon obesulus
Stomach and intestine: collected Innisfail, Qld.
Profilarinema hemsleyi Durette-Desset & Beveridge,
1981
Ann. Purasil. (Paris) 56 (2), p. 188-91
from Trichosurus vulpecula
Stomach: collected W.A,.
Cotypes V2694-8
Sprattellus harrigani Durette-Desset & Cassone, 1980
Bull, Mfus. natn. Hist. nat,, Paris Ser 4 2 A (4),
p. 949-51
from Phascogale tapoatafa
intestine: collected Vic.
Cotypes V2694-8
Sprattellus woolleyue Durette-Desset & Cassone, 1980
Bull. Mus. natn, Hist. nat. Paris Ser 4 2 A (4),
p. 951-53
from Anlechinus stuartii
Intestine: collected Sandy Point, Western Point, Vic.
Cotypes V2692-3
Tetraboitirivostrongylus mackerrasae Mawson, 1960
Parasitology 50, p. 427-8
Holotype 2, allotype 2? V1458 from Phascogale flavipes
Intestine: collected Innisfail, Qld.
Paratypes HC3340
Trichostrongylus (s.L) incertus Johnston & Mawson,
1941
REC. 8. AUST. MUS,, 18 (17): 385-413
dprtl, 1983
Trans. R. Soc. 8. Aust. 65 (2), p. 254-5
Holotype 2 V1448 from Hydroprogne caspia strenua
Intestine: collected Tailem Bend, S.A.
Woolleya antechini Humphery-Smith & Durrette-
Desset (in press)
Holotype 4 V2723, allotype 2 V2724 from Antechinus
sruartil
Intestine: collected Powelltown, Vic.
Woalleva didelphis Humphery-Smith & Durette-Des-
set (in press)
Holotype ¢ V2728, allotype 2 V2729 from Antechinus
swainsonit
Intestine: collected Nadgee, N.S.W.
Wooalleya hickmani Mawson, 1973
Trans. R. Soc. S, Aust. 97 (4), p. 277-8
now Patricialina hickmani (Mawson, 1973), Hum-
phery-Smith & Durette-Desset, 1981
Holotype é, allotype 2? V1523 from Aniechinus stuartil
Intestine: collected Condor Ck., A,C.T-
Hoolleva martini Mawson, |973
Trans. R. Soc. 8. Aust. 97 (4), p, 275
now FPatricialina martini (Mawson, 1973) Humphery-
Smith & Durette-Desset, 1981
Holotype 3, allotype 2 V1522 from Anlechinomys
spencert
Intestine: collected Sandringham, Qld.
Paratypes AHC7295
Woalleya monodelphis Mawson, 1973
Trans. R. Soc, S. Aust. 97 (4), p. 278-9
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1524 from Antechinus stuartil
Intestine: collected Condor Ck,, A.C.T.
Woolleya sprenti Mawson, 1973
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 97 (4), p, 275
Holotype 4, allotype 2? V1521 from Dasyurus viverrinus
Intestine: collected Icena, Tas.
Paratypes AHC5447, 4940
Superfamily Trichuroidea
Anatrichosoma haycocki Spratt (in press)
Holotype 3 V2859, allotype 2 V2860 from Antechinus
sWwainsonil
Paracloacal glands: collected Nadgee State Forest,
N.S.W,
Paratypes V2861-69
Cupillaria cooperi Johnston & Mawson, 1945
Trans. R. Soc, S. Aust. 69 (2), p. 245
Holotype ¢ V1230, allotype 2 V¥1231 from Callionpnius
calaurapomus
Alimentary canal: collected St Vincent's Gulf, S.A,
Capillaria ellisi Johnston & Mawson, 1945
Trans. R. Soc. S. Ausi. 69 (2), p. 247
Holotype $ V1237, allotype 2 V1238 from Chenopsis
atrala
Alimentary canal: collected Tailem Bend, S.A.
HELMINTH TYPE SPECIMENS IN THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM
Capillaria graucalina Johnston & Mawson, 1941
Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 66 (3-4), p. 250
Holotype 4, allotype 2 V1431 from Coracina novae-
hollandiae
Alimentary canal: collected West Burleigh, Qld
Capillaria grallinae Johnston & Mawson, 1945
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 69 (2), p. 247-8
Holotype ¢ V1235, allotype 2 V1236 from Grallina
cyanoleuca
Alimentary canal: collected Tailem Bend, S.A.
Capillaria jaenschi Johnston & Mawson, 1945
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 69 (2), p. 245
Holotype ¢ V1240, allotype 2 V1241 from Phalacro-
corax sulcirostris
Alimentary canal: collecied Tailem Bend, S.A.
Capillaria latridopsis Johnston & Mawson, 1945
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 69 (2), p. 245
Holotype $ V1227, allotype ? V1228 from Latridopsis
forsteri
Alimentary canal: Kangaroo Is., S.A.
Capillaria lepidopodis Johnston & Mawson, 1944
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 68 (1), p. 66
Holotype 2 V1229 from Lepidopus caudatus
Alimentary canal: collected St Vincents Gulf, S.A.
Capillaria miniopterae Thomas, 1959
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 82, p. 151-2
Holotype 4 V2809, allotype 2 V2810 from Miniopterus
blepotis
Alimentary canal: collected Canungra, Qld
Paratypes AHC3155
Note: The description of this species was published
in the only paper in which Mrs Thomas did not
retain use of the name Mawson.
Capillaria murrayensis Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 64 (2), p. 342
Holotype 2 V1387 from Mccullochella macquariensis
Intestine: collected from Tailem Bend, S.A.
Capillaria orectolobi Johnston & Mawson, 1951
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 74 (1), p. 24
Holotype ¢ V2879 from Orectolobus devisi
Alimentary canal: collected Port Willunga, S.A.
Paratypes AHC8662
Capillaria plectroplites Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 64 (2), p. 341-2
Holotype 4, allotype 2? V1386 from Plectroplites
ambiguus
Gills: collected Swan Reach, S.A.
Capillaria pomatostomi Johnston & Mawson, 1945
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 69 (2), p. 247
Holotype 2 V1239 from Pomatostomus superciliosus
Alimentary canal: collected Tailem Bend, S.A.
409
Capillaria praeputialis Obendorf, 1979
Aust. J. Zool. 27, p. 872-7
Holotype ¢ V806, allotype 2 V807 from Rattus Jascipes
Praeputial glands: collected Gladysdale, Vic.
Paratypes V808-9
Capillaria recurvirostrae Mawson, 1966
Parasitology 56, p. 282
Holotype 3, allotype 2 V1466 from Recurvirostra
novaehollandiae
Duodenum: collected St Kilda, Vic.
Capillaria rhinobati Johnston & Mawson, 1945
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 69 (2), p. 243-4
Holotype ¢ V1232, allotype 2 V1233 from Aptycho-
trema banksii
Alimentary canal: collected Rapid Bay, S.A.
Capillaria rickardi Beveridge & Barker, 1975
J. Helminth. 49, p. 219-220
Holotype ¢ V64, allotype 2 V65 from Antechinus
stuartii
Stomach: collected Powelltown, Vic.
Paratypes V66
Capillaria strigis Johnston & Mawson, 1944
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 68 (1), p. 65-6
Holotype ¢ V1234 from Ninox novaeseelandiae
Alimentary canal: collected Invercargill, N.Z.
Capillaria tandani Johnston & Mawson, 1940
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 64 (2), p. 342
Holotype ? V1388 from Tandanus tandanus
Intestine: collected Tailem Bend, S.A.
Capillaria thomascameroni Mawson, 1969
J. Fish. Res. Board Canada, 26, p. 1104-5
Holotype ¢, allotype 2 V1509 from Larus novaehol-
landiae
Oesophagus, proventiculus: collected West Is., S.A.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank Mrs P. M. Thomas (Mawson)
and Dr I. Beveridge without whose help and advice
this list could not have been prepared. This work was
supported by an ABRS grant.
REFERENCES
ANDERSON, R. C. 1978. Keys to genera of the superfamily
Metastrongyloidea. In. C.I.H. Keys to the nematode parasites
of vertebrates; No. 5. Commw. Agric. Bur., Farnham Royal,
England.
ANGEL, L. M. and MAWSON, P. M. 1969. Helminths from
some lizards mostly from South Australia. Trans. R. Soc.
S. Aust., 92: 59-62.
BAIN, O. and CHABAUD, A. G. 1979. Sur les Muspiceidae
(Mensteda—Doryhiimina), Ann. Parasit., (Paris), 54 (2): 207-
55.
BAIN, O. and MAWSON, P. M. 1981. On some oviparous filarial
nematodes mainly from Australian birds. Rec. S. Aust. Mus.
18 (13): 265-284,
4in
BEVERIDGE, | 1978a. A taxonomic revision of the genera Phas-
colostrongyius Canavan, and Oesophagostomoides Schwartz
(Nematoda: Trichonematidae) from Wombats. dust. ./. Zool,
26: 585-602.
BEVERIDGE., I. 1978b, Curollostrongylus hypsiprymenodortis gen.
et sp, n. (Nematoda; Strongylidae) from the rat-kangarop
Hypsiprymnodon moschatus (Marsupialia). J. Parasital., 64
(4): 657-660.
BEVERIDGE, I. 1979a- Spectes of Cloacina Linstow, !898
(Nematoda: Strongyloidea) from the Black-iailed Wallaby,
Wallabia bicolor (Desmarest, 1804), from Eastern Australia.
J. Helminthol. 33: 363-378.
BEVERIDGE, f. 1979b, A review of the Globocephaloidinac Inglis
(Nematoda: Armidostomatidae) from Macropidid Marsupials.
Aust. J. Zool, YI: V§)-175.
BEVERIDGE, 1, 1980. Uncinaria hvdramyidis sp. n, (Nematoda:
Ancylostomatidae) from the Australian, water rat-—A ydromys
chrvsogaster. J, Parasitol, 66 (6): 1027-1031.
BEVERIDGE. |. 19812. Trigonosionema gen. a. (Nematoda:
Strongyloidea) from the Pademelon. Thylogale stigmatica
(Marsupislia) in Australia, with two new species T, irigora-
soma 30 n. and T. longibursata sp: n. J, Parasitol, 67 (1)
- 100.
REVERIDGE, [. L981b. Thylonemia gen. a, (Nematoda: Stron-
gyloidea) from the Pademelon, Thylogale stigmatica (Mar-
supialia) ee Ausealte with three new species, J. Purasitel, 67
(1); 101-107,
BEVERIDGE, |. 1982. A taxonomic revision of the Pharyngos
irongylinea Popova, 1952 (Nematoda: Strongyloidea) frorn
Macrapodid marsupials. Aust. J. Zoal. Suppl. Ser, 83: 150p,
BEVERLDGE, L and BARKER, J, K. L975a. Acuariid, capillanid,
and hymenolepidid parasites of the dasyurid marsupial Ate
chinus stuartht Macleay, 1841, from south eastern Australia,
J, Helminthal., 49: 211-227.
BEVERIDGE, f. and BARKER, J. K. 1975b. Nicallina antechini
sp. pn. (Nematoda: Anudestomatidae) from the nasal cavity
of the dasyund marsupial Antechinus stilar/{? Macleay, 1841,
and associated pathology. J, Parasifol., 61 (3): 489-493.
BEVERIDGE, I. and MAWSON, P. M. 1978. A taxonomic revision
of the genera Macropostrongyloides Yamaguti and Para-
macropostrongylus Johnston & Mawson (Nematoda; 'Tricho-
Senaathae) from Australian Marsupials. Aust. J, Zoal., 26:
63-787.
BEVERIDGE, L and JOHNSON, P, M. 198]. Three new genera
of nematodes (Strongyloidea; Cloacininae) from the Red-
legged Pademelon, Thvlogale siigmatica Gould (Marsupialia;
pacrapadilged fram Eastern Australia. System, Parasil. 3,
94-100.
BEVERIDGE, |, and PRESIDENTE, P_J. A, (977. Rugapharynx
rosemariae new species (Nematoda: Pharyngostrongylidae)
from Grey Kangaroos (Macropus i
iganieus and M. filiginosus)
with Ai eycle stages and associated pathology. Jnt, J; Parasitol,
: 387.
CHABAUD, A. G. 1956, Essai de revision des physalopiéres
peraniies de reptiles. 4nn, Paras. Hum. Camp, 30 (1-2): 29-
$2.
CHABAUD, A. G. 1958. Essai de Clasification des sématodes
Habronematine. 4am, Parasil. Hum. Comp., 33 (4): 447-508.
CHABAUD, A: G, 1975. Keys 1a the genera of the Order Spirunda
No. 3 (2) Spiruroidea, Habronerriatoidea, and Acuanoidea
In C.LH. Keys to the nematode parasites. of vertebrates.
Commw. Agric. Bur., Farnham Royal, England,
CHABAUD, A, G. 1978, Keys lo the genera of the Superfamilies
Cosiocercoidea, Seuraigidea, Hetérakoides and Subuluratdea.
No. 6. ln C.LH. Keys to the nematode parasites of vertebrates.
Commw. Agric. Bur., Farmham Royal, England.
CHABAUD, A G. and Bain, O. 1976. La lignée Dipfalonema,
Watt essai de classification. Ann. Parasit, (Parts), St (3):
CHABAUD, A. G., Seureau, Cl, Beveridge, I., Bain, O. and
Durette-Desset, M-C), 1980. Sur les nématodes Echinone-
matinae. tan. Parastl, (Paris), 55 (4); 427-443.
REC. S AUST, MUS. 18 (17): 385-413
April, Mss
DURETTE-DESSET, M-CL 1970. Le genre Nippastrongyits Lane,
pe a ld a Ann. Parasit,. Hum, Camp.,
p RLS-B2!-
DURETTE-DESSET, M-Ci, 1971. Essai de classification des
nematodes Héligmosomes. Corrélations avec la pateobinges:
grapine des hétes. Men. Mus. ratl, Hist, rat, Paris. n, ser.
Ser., A 69: 126p.
DURETTE-DESSET, M-Cl. 1973. Note recificative sur le genre
Ausirostruneylus (Nématode), 4nn. Parast, (Pars), (3):
| “eh
DURETTE-DESSET. M-Cl, and BEVERIDGE, |. 1981a. Cope
mania ahendorfi n.sp. Nématode Trichostrongyloide parasite
@un Marsupial australien, 4yin. Parasit., 56 (1): 63-66,
DURETTE-DESSET, M-Cl, and BEVERIDGE, 1, 198lb. Pera-
melistrongylus Mawson, 1960 et Profilarinema n.gen. Néma-
todes Trichostrongyloides paraissant faire transition entre Jes
Strongyloides et le genre atypique Filarinenia Monnig, 1929.
inn. Parasit (Paris), 5@ (2); 183-191.
DLURETTE-DESSET, M-Cl. and CASSONE, J. 1980, Mackerras-
frongvlus. Mawson, 1960, et Spratrellus n. gen, (Nematoda,
Trichostmongyloidea) parasites de Perameloidea et de Das-
yuroidea (Marsupiax australiens). Bull. Mus. natn, Hist Hat,
Paris, Ser 4.2 A (4); 943-954,
FILIPJEV, 1.N. 1934. The classification of the frecliving nematodes
and their relation to the parasilic nematodes, Smithsonian
Mis, Coll. 89 (6): 1-63.
HARTWICH, G, 1974. Keys to genera of the Ascandoidea. In
C.F. Keys to the Nematode parasites of vertebrates. No. 2.
Commw. Agric. Bur, Farnham Royal, England,
AUMPHERY-SMITH, J. 1980. Beveridgiella n.gen,. Dessetosiran-
eylus n.gen. (Nématoda, Trichostrongyloidea) parasites de
Mursuprax australiens. Bu/l Mus. main. Hist. nat, Paris, Ser
424 (4): 999-1012.
HUMPHERY-SMITH, J, and DURETTE-DESSET, M-Cl, 1981.
Patricialina Ynelis, 1968. (Nématoda, Trichostrongyloidea),
parasite de Marsupiaux australiens. Bull, Mus, nain, Fist.
nat., Paris, Ser 43.4 (Ly 123-132,
HUMPHERY-SMITH, I. and DURETTE-DESSET, M-C1. in press.
Wonlleya, Mawson, 1973 (Nérnatoda, Trichostrongyloidea)
parasites de Marsuptapx australiens.
INGLIS, W. G. 1968. The geographical and evolutionary rela-
honships of Australian tnchostrongyloid parasites and their
hosts. J, Linn. Soe. (Zooal), 47: 327-347.
INGLIS, W. G. 1968. Nematodes parasitic in Western Australian
frogs. Bull. Brit. Mus, (nat, hist) Zool, 16 (4): 163-183,
JOHNSTON, T. H. 1912. Notes on some Enlozoa. Proc R. Soe
Old, 24; 63-95
JOHNSTON, T, H. and MAWSON, P. M. 19382. An account of
some filanal parasites of Australian marsupials. Trusty. 2.
Soc S. Aust., 62 (1): 107-121.
JOHNSTON, T, H-and MAWSON, P. M. 1938b, Some nematodes
acon Australian marsupials. Reo, S. dust Adas, @ (2); 1B7-
198,
JOHNSTON, T, H. and MAWSON, P.M. 1938c. Strangyle nema-
jodes from Central Australian kangaroos and wallabies. Trav,
R. Sow S. Ausi,, 62 (2): 263-286.
JOHNSTON, T. H. and MAWSON, P, M. 1939. Strompyle
nematodes from Queensland marsupials. Trans. R, Sov
S. Aust., 63 (2 121-148.
JOHNSTON, T. H. sand MAWSON, P.. M_ 1939b, Inlernal parasites
ot ai Pigmy Sperm Whale. Rec. 5. 4usr Muy, 6 (3): 263-
JOHNSTON, T. H. and MAWSON, P, M. 1939c. Sundry nema-
todes from Eastern Ausiralian maftsupials. Trans. &. Soe,
S. Aust., 63 (2): 204-209.
JOHNSTON, T. H.and MAWSON, P, M, 1939d, Some nematodes
from Victotian and Western Australian marsupials. J rans
R. Soc. §. Aust., 63 (2). 307-310.
JOHNSTON, T. H. and MAWSON, P. M. 1939e. Strongylate
nematodes from marsupials in New South Wales. Proc, Linn.
Soc. N.S.W., 64 (5-6)! 514-536.
HELMINTH TYPE SPECIMENS IN THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSELIM
JOHNSTON, T. H. and MAWSON, P, M. 1940a. New and
known nematodes from Australian marsupials. Proc Linn.
Soc, NSU, 68 (5-6); 468-476.
JOHNSTON, T. H.and MAWSON, P.M. 1940b. On a collection
of nematodes fram Aastralian marsupials. Ree. use. Afis,
20 (5): 360-366.
JOUNSTON, T. H. and MAWSON, P. M, 1940c, Nematodes
fiom South Australian marsupials, Trans. K. Soo. S. Aust,
64 (71): 95-100.
JOHNSTON, T. H. and MAWSON, P. M. 1940d. Some nematodes
parasitic in Australian freshwater Aish. Trans. R. Socs
S. dust, 64 (2); 340-352,
JOHNSTON, T. H. and MAWSON, P. M. 1940e. Some Filarial
paraniee of Australian birds. Trans. R, Soe. 8. Aust., 64 (2):
355-361.
JOHNSTON, T. H. and MAWSON, P. M. 194]a. Nematodes
as aupraties marine mammals, Rec, 8, Ausi. Mus:, 6 (4);
429.434,
JOHNSTON, T. H. and MAWSON, P: M, 1941b. Some nematodes
from Australian birds of prey. Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust, 65 (1)!
30-35
JOHNSTON, T..H. and MAWSON, P.M, 1941c, Some parasitic
nematodes in the collection of the Australian museum. Rec:
Aust. Mis, 21 (1): 9-164,
JOHNSTON, T, H. and MAWSON, P: M. 19414. Ascarotd nema-
ee rant Australian birds. Trans, R. Soc. S. Aust, 65 (1):
}10-L15.
JOHNSTON, T, H. and MAWSON, P.M, 1941e. Some nematode
parasites. of Austrahan birds, Proc Linn. Sov NS, 65 (3-
4); 250-256,
JOHNSTON, T. H. and MAWSON, P, M, 1941f Additional
nematodes from Australian birds. Trans. R. Soe. 8. Aust, 65
(2); 254-262.
JORNSTON, T. H- and MAWSON, P.M. 1941g; Some nematodes
om “Sangaoe (sland, South Australia. Rec. S dust. Mus,
Ty; 145-148.
JOHNSTON, T. Hand MAWSON, P. M, 1942a, Some new and
known Australian parasitic nematodes. Proc. Linn. Swe.
N.S." ,-67 (1-2): 90-94,
JOHNSTON, T, H. and MAWSON, P.M. 1942b. Some avian
nematodes from Tailem Bend, South Australia. Trans, R.
Soo. §. Aust, 66 (L)) 71-75.
JOHNSTON, T. H. and MAWSON, P, M. 1942c. Remarks on
some parasitic nematodes. Rew, S. dust, Mus. 7 (2): 183-186.
JOHNSTON, T. H. and MAWSON, PM, 1942d. Nematodes
from Australian Albatrosses and Petrels. Trans. &, Sac.
S. Aust. 66 (1): 66-70.
JOHNSTON, T, H. and MAWSON, P, M. 1943, Some nematodes
from Australian elasmobranchs, Trans. R, Soe. S. Aust, 67
(2) 187-190.
JOHNSTON, T. Ho and MAWSON, P. M, 1944. Remarks on
some parasitic nematodes from Australia and New Zealand,
Trans. R. See. S- Aust., 68 (1); 60-66,
JOHNSTON, T, H, and MAWSON, P, M, 1945a. Some paragitit
fHematodes trom South Australian fish. Trans. R. Sac. S.
dust, OF (1): 114-117.
JOHNSTON, T. H. and MAWSON, P.M. 1945b, Capillariid
nematodes from South Australian fish and tirds. Trans, &.
Soc. S. dust, 69 (2): 243-248.
JOHNSTON, T. H. and MAWSON, P.M. 1945c. Parasitic nema-
todes BAN. Z.ARE. Rep, Ser BS (2); 74159.
JOHNSTON, T. H, and MAWSON, P. M. 1947a. Some avian
and fish nematodes chiefly from Tailem Bend, South Australia.
Rec, §, Aust, Mus., 8 (4): §47-553,
JOHNSTON, T. H. and MAWSON, P.M. 1947b. Some nematodes
from Australian lizards. Trans, &. Soe. S. Aust, 73 (1); 22-
27.
JOHNSTON. T. H. and MAWSON, P. M. 1948, Some new
records of nematodes from Australian snakes, Rec. 5. lust,
Mus, 9 (1): 101-106.
41)
JOHNSTON, T. Hoand MAWSON, P. M, 1949, Some nematodes
from Australian hosts together with a note an RAahedlitiy
allgent. Trans. R. Soc. 8. Aust., 73: 63-7).
JOHNSTON, T. H. and MAWSON, P.M. 1951. Additional
nEwALpAis from Australian fish. Trans. & Soc. S Aust, 74
(1): '
JOHNSTON, T. H. and MAWSON, P. M. 1951. Report on some
parasitic nematodes from the Australian Museum. Rec. 40.
Mus,, 22 (4); 289-296,
JOHNSTON, T. A, and MAWSON. P: M. 1952. Some nematodes
Soe Aveiralran birds and mammals. Trans. R, Soc. 5S) Aust.,
; 30-37.
JOHNSTON, T. H-and ‘SIMPSON, E. R. 1942. Some nematodes
From Australian trogs. Trans. R, Soc S. Ausi., 66 (2): 172-
KUNG, C, ©. 1948, Some new nematodes from the Ausiralian
wallaby (Mucropus rufogrisea fruticus) with a note pn the
synonymy of the genera Zoniolainius, Labiastrongylus and
Buecostrongylus. J. Helminthol. 22 (2); 93-108.
MACKERRAS, M. J. 1959. Strongyloides and Parastrongyloldes
(Nematoda: Rhabdiasoidea) in Australian marsupials, dust.
J Boal, 7 (2); 87-104.
MACKERRAS, M. J. 1962. Filarial parasites. (Nematoda: Filar-
ividea) of Australian animals. Aust. J. Zool. 10 (3); 400-457.
MAGZOUB, A, 1964. Three nematode species (Strongyloidea,
Tochoneminae) trom Queensland wallabies. Trans. R. Sac.
S. Aust, BB: 47-51.
MAWSON, P. M. 1953a. Parasitic nematoda collected by the
Australian National Antarctic Research Expedition: Heard
fsland and Macquarie Island, 1948-1951, Parasitology, 43 (3
& 4), 291-297.
MAWSON, P, M. 1953b, Some marine freeliving nematodes from
the Australian coast, Trans. R, Soc. S. Aust. 76: 34-40,
MAWSON, P. M. 1954. Ichthvastrangylus clelandi ag, nsp,
ely an Austrahan shark. Trans, Ro Soc. S. Aust., 77: 162+
63,
MAWSON, P. M. 1955. Some parasites of Australian vertebrates.
Trans. R, Soc. 8, Aust., 78; t-7,
MAWSON, P, M, 1957a. Manne treeliving nematodes from ‘South
Australia, Trans. R Sac 8. Aust. 80: 98-108.
MAWSON, P. M. 1960a, Seuratinemia Johnston & Mawson, 194),
synonyme de Skrjah(nura Gnedina, (933, Ana. Parasir. Hue,
Comp., 35: 430-1,
MAWSON, P. M. 1960b. Nematodes belonging to the Tricho-
strongylidae SubtWuridae, Rhabiasidae and Trichuridae from
bandicoots. dust, J. Zool., 8 (2); 261-284,
MAWSON, P. M, !96(c. Two new species of trichostrongylc
nematodes from the Australian Pouched Mouse, Phascogali
flavipes (Waterhouse). Parasitology, 50: 425-429.
MAWSON, P. M. 1961a, A new species and some new records
in the genus Cloacina (Nematoda: Strangyloidea) from West-
em Australia, Trans. 8. Soc. S. Aust., 85: 81-83,
MAWSON, P. M. |961b. Trichostrongyles ftom Rodenis in
Queensland, with comments on the genus Longistriala
seeoatea: Heligmosomatidae). Aust, J. Zool,, 9 (5): 791-
MAWSON, P. M. 1964, Some nematoda (Strongylina and Oxy-
urina) from kangaroos (Macrapus spp..) from Eastern Aus-
tralia. Parasitology 54; 237-262.
MAWSON, P. M, 1965. Notes on some species of Nematoda
Irom kangaroos and wallabies, including a new genus and
ihree new species. Parasitalagy $5, 145-162,
MAWSON, P. M. 1966. Three species of the genus Geopetiria
Chabaud (Nematoda; Spinurata) from Australian birds. Para-
Suology!, 56: 715-718,
MAWSON, P. M. 19684. Tngliscnema typos gen, AGV., 8p.n nov.,
(Nematoda Seuratoidea; Inglisonematinae, sub. fam. nov.)
from an Australian bird. Parasitology, $8 71-73.
MAWSON, P. M. 1968b. Two species af Nematode fram Aus
iralian dasyurids. Parasitology, 58. 75-78,
4n2
MAWSON, PF. M. 1968c, Nematodes fram Australian waders,
Parasitology, 58: 277-305.
MAWSON, P. M. 1968d. A new genus, dlainchabaudia (Nematoda:
Spirunnae) from coraciiform birds in Australia. Parasitalogy.
58; 741-744.
MAWSON. P.M. |968e Habronematinae (Nematoda; Spirundae)
from Australian birds, Parasitology, 58: 745-767,
MAWSQN, P. M. 1969. Some nematodes fram Australian gulls
and tems../, Fish. Res. Bo) Canada, 26; 1103-1114.
MAWSON. P. M, 1970, Skrjabingplera eoldmanae n.sp. (Nema-
toda; Physalopteridac) from an Australian agamid lizard.
Trans, R. Sov. §. Aust., 94) 223-225.
MAWSGN, P.M. 1971a. Two new species of Riemuaria (Nema-
wda) from Australian rodents. Trans. R. Soe. S. Aust, 95
(2): 61-64.
MAWSON, P. M. 1971b, Pearson Island Expedition 1969, 8.
Helminths. Trans, R- Soc. & Awsn, 95 (3): 169-183.
MAWSON, P. M. 1972Za. The nematode genus Maxvachonia
(Oxyurata: Cosmocercidae) in Australian reptiles and frogs.
Trans: R. Soc. S, Aust, 96 (2); 101-108.
MAWSON. P. M. L972b, Three new species of the genus Cludcina
Linstow (Nematoda: Strongylata) from macropod marsupials.
Trans. R. Soe. 8. Aust, 96 (2) 109-113.
MAWSON, P.M, 1972c. The genus ledaria Bremser (Nematoda:
Apuwraia) in Australia. Trans. R. Soe, S Aust, 96 (3): 139-
47.
MAWSON, P. M. 1973. Amicostomatinae (Nematoda: Tricho-
strongyloidea) from Australian marsupials and monotremes.
Trans, R. Soe. S. Aust., 97 (4): 257-279.
MAWSON, P. M. 1974, The genus Poforustrongvius Johnston &
Mawson (Nematoda: Trichonematidae) from macropod mar-
supials 7rans. &. Sov, 8, Ausr., BB (3): 135-138.
MAWSON, P.M. 1975. Two new species of the genus Cloacina
(Nematoda: Strongylida) from the Tammar, Macropus eugenti
Trans. R. Sac, S. Aust. 99 (1); 39-42.
MAWSON, P, M. 1976. MWoodwardostrongylus obendorfi new spe~
cies (Nematoda: Amidostomatidae) from kangaroos, Trans.
R. Soc. §. Aust, 100 (3): 121-124.
MAWSON, P, M. [977a. The genus Cyclostrongylus Johnston &
Mawson (Nematoda; Trichonematidae), Trans R. Soe.
S. Aust, 101 (1: 19-20.
MAWSON, P.M, 1977b. Revision of the genus Macrepostrogylus
and descriptions of three new genera! Pupovastrongylus, Dor-
capsinema and Arundelia (Nematoda: Trichonematidae)
Trans. R Soe S. Ausi,, 101 (2); 51-62.
MAWSON, P. M. 1977c. The genus Microtelrameres (Nematoda:
Spirurida) in Australian birds. Rec. 8. Aust, Mus. 17 (14):
239-259,
MAWSON, P. M. 1978a, Macropiedla o.g., rsp. (Nematoda:
Sirongylidae) from a Western Australian kangaroo. Trans, R.
Sac. S. Aust, 12 (4); 113-115.
MAWSON, P. M. 1978b. AMfacroponema (Nematoda: Trichone-
matidae); a new genus from macropod Marsupials. /ne. J.
Parasil., 8: 163-166.
MAWSON, P, M, 1978e. A new genus Adelonema (Nematoda:
Oxyundae) from Australian phalangerid marsupials. Trans.
R, Soc, S. Aust. 102 (8); 223-226.
MAWSON, P. M. 19792, Alocoslonia new genus (Nematoda:
Trichonematidae). Trans, R. Sac, S; Aust., 13 (5): 123-126,
MAWSON, P. M. 1979b. Some Tetramendae (Nematoda: Spi-
runda) from Australian birds Trans. Ro Sone S. Aust, 103
(7) 177-184.
MAWSON, P. M. 1980, Some Strongyle nematodes (Amidostomum
spp.) from Australian birds. Tras. R. Soc. S. Aust., 104 (1):
j-12,
MAWSON, P. M. 1980. Beveridgea new genus (Nematoda: Stron-
gylidea) from the Agile Wallaby fram noarthermm Australia.
Tram. R Soc. S: Aust, 14 (4) $1-2,
RECS. AULIST. MUS., 18 (17): 385-413
dprtl, 1Y83
MONNIG. H. O. 1926. Three new helminths. Trans, R. Sac,
S. Afr, 13 291-98.
MOORHOUSE, D., BAIN, O., and WOLF, G. 1979. Jusefilaria
mackerrasse gen. el sp. NOV. (Nematoda: Filaroidea) parasite
de la chauve-souris Macroderma gigas Dobson, 4nn Parasit.
Hum. Camp., 54 (6): 645-51,
OBENDORF, BD. L. 1979. The Helminth parasites of Ra/lus
Jfuscipes (Waterhouse) from, Victoria, including desenption of
iwa new pematode species. dust. J. Zool, 27: 867-79,
PETTER, A. J, L974, Deux nouvelles espéces de Cucullonidae
parasites de poissons en Guyane, Bull. Mus. natn Hist, nar.
Paris, Ser 3 (255) Zool. 177; 1459-1467.
SONIN, M. D. 1961, On the revision of the nematode subfamily
Splendidodofilaninae Chabaud & Choquet, 1953 (im Russian).
Trudy Gel ‘mint, Lab,, Akad. Nauk. SSSR, 14: 242-250.
SPRATT, D. M. 1979. A taxonomic revision of the lungworms
(Nematoda: Metastrongyloidea) from Australian marsupials.
Aust. J. Zool. Suppl. Ser., 67: 1-45.
SPRATT, D. M, 1980, Metathelazia naghiensiy sp. n. (Nematoda:
Pneumospiruriday) from the Lang-nosed Bandicoot, Perameles
nasula (Marsupialia), J) Parasiful. 66 (6): 1032-1035,
SPRATT, D. M. 1981, Anechinostrongylus disgubernaculus gen.
et sp. n. (Nematoda: Angiostrongylidae) from the marsupial
mouse Antechinus swainsonti (Marsupialia: Dasyurdae), J-
Parasitology, 67 (1); 90-93,
SPRATT, D. M. and SPEARE, R. 1982. Durtkainema macropi
gen. el, sp. nov, (Muspiccoldea: Robertdollfusidae) a remark-
able nematode from. Macropodidae (Marsumalia), inn. de.
Parasit. fin press).
SPRATT, D. M. and VARUGHESE, G. 1975, A taxonomic reyi-
sion of filaricid nematodes from Australian marsupials. dust.
J. Zool. Suppl Ser. 35: 1-99,
THOMAS, P. M. 1959, Some nematode parasites [rom Australian
hosts. Trans KR. Soc. S. Ausi., 82: 1S1-162.
YAMAGUTI, 8, 1961. Systema Helminthum 3. The nematode
parasites of vertebrates. (Interscience Publishers; New York).
YORKE, W and MAPLESTONE, P. A. 1926. The nematode
parasites of vertebrates. (J, and A, Churchill’ London).
INDEX OF GENERIC NAMES
Abbreviaia, Physalopteroidea 396
Acuaria, Acuarioidea 386, 387
Adelonema; Oxyuroidea 396
Alainchabaudia; Spiruroidea 397
Aleuris, Oxyuroidea 395
Alocostoma, Strongyloidea 400
Amidosiomum, Tnchostrongyluidea 405
Amphibiaphilus; Trichostrongyloidea 405
Amplicaecum: Ascaridaidea 388
Amphicephaloides, Trichostrongyloidea 405
Anatrichosoma; Trichuroidea 408
Angullicala; Dracunculoidea 390
Aaisakis, Ascaridoidea 388
Aniechinostrongy lus, Metasirongyloidea 394
Aplectana, Cosmocercoidea 389
Apracta, Aproctoidea 387, 388
Arundelia; Strongyloidea 40!
Ascarophis, Habranematoidea 392
Asymmetracantha, Trichostrongyloidea 405
Austrofilaria, Aproctoidea 388
Austraheligmonema, Trichostrongyloidea 405
Austrostroneylus, Trichostrangyloidea 405, 406
dustroxyuris, Oxyuroidea 395
Bancrafiinema; Physalopteroidea 396
Beveridgea; Strongyloidea 398
Beveridgiella, Trichostrongyloidea 406, 407
Sretnlia (Breinlia); Filarwoidea 390, 391
Bretnlia (Johnstonema), Filarioidea 390, 391
Buccastrongylus: Strongyloidea 398
Capillaria, Trichuroidea 408, 409
Cardiafilaria; Filariodesa 390
Carinema; Filarioidea 390
Cassunema, Strongyloidea 398
Chetlonematadunt, Acuarioidea 387
Chevreuxia; Acuarividea 387
Cloacina; Strangyloidea 398, 399, 400
Comtracaceunt, Ascaridcidea 388
Copemania, Trichostrongyloidea 406
Corollostrangylus;, Strongyloidea 400
Coronastrangylus, Strongyloidea 400
Cosmoucephalus, Acuarioidea 387
Cosmocerca, Cosmocercaidea 389
Crasstcauda; Habronematoidea 392
Cucullanellus; Seuratoidea 397
Cucullanus, Seuratoidea 397
Cyathospiruya, Spiruroidea 397
Cyelostrongylus, Strongylaidea 400
Cyrnea; Habronematoidea 392
Dessetostrongylus, Trichostrongyloidea 406
Dichelyne (Cucullanellus). Souratoidea 397
Diomedenema, Aproctoidea 388
Diplotriaena, Diplotriaenoidea 389, 390
Dipetalonema; Filanoidea 390, 391
Pimetalanema (Chenofilaria), Filarioidea 391
Dispharynx, Acuarioidea 387
Durikainema; Muspiceoidea 395
Echinonema, Seuratoidea 397
Echinuria, Acuanaidea 387
Eustrongylides, Dioctophymatoidea 389
Excisa, Habranematoidea 392
Faleaustra, Cosmocercoidea 389
Filarinema, Trichostrongyloidea 406
Filaroides (Filaroides), Metastrongyloidea 394
Filaroides (Parafilaraides), Metastrongyloidea 395
Foliastoma;, Strongyloidea 400
CGeopetitia, Habronematoidea 392
Globocephaloides; Trichostrongyloidea 406
Goezia, Ascandoidea 388
Gongylonema; Spiruroidea 397, 398
Hahronema, Habronematoidea 392, 393
Hamatospiculunt, Diplotriaenoidea 390
Harveyjohastonia; Chromadoridae 386
Hedruris, Habronematoidea 393
Heligmonoides, Trichostrongyloidea 406
Hepatojarakus, Trichostrongyloidea 406
Heterakis, Heteraloidea 394
Hypodontis, Strongyloidea 401
[chthyostrongylus, Trichostrongyloidea 406
Tnglisonema; Seuratoidea 397
Johnstonema:, Filarioidea 391
Jasefilaria; Filarioidea 391
Lahiobulura; Subuluroidea 404, 405
Labiostrongyvlus; Strongyloidea 401
Leipaanema; Subuluroidea 405
Litomosa; Filarioidea 391
Longistriata; Trichostrongyloidea 407
Macdonaldius; Filarioidea 392
Mackerrastronevlus, Trichostrongyloidea, 406, 407
Macropicola; Strangyloidea 401
Macroponema, Strongyloidea 401
Macropostrongyloides; Strongyluidea 401
Macropostrongvlus; Strongyloidea 401
Macropoxyuris; Osyuraidea 395
Mammanidula; Tnchostrongyloidea 407
Maplestonema; Strongyloidva 40\_
Marsupostrongylus; Metastrongyloidea 394, 395
Mastonema; Tnchostrongyloidea 407
Maxvachonia; Cosmocercuidea 389
Metathelazia; Thelazioidea 405
Metoncholaimus; Enoplidae 386
Microhadjelia; Habronematoidea 392
Microtetrameres; Habronematoidea 393
Montlonema; Strongyloidea 40}
Nicollina; Trichostrongyloidea 407
Nippostrongylus; Tnchostrangyloidea 405
Odilia: Trichostrongyloidea 406, 407
Ovsophagonasres; Strongyloidea 401
Oesuphagostomoides; Strangyloidea 402
Ophidascaris; Ascaridoidea 388 | ;
Oswaldocruzia; Trichostrongyloidea 4007
Oxypspirura; Thelazoidea 405
Oxyuris; Oxyuroidea 395
Papillostrongylus; Strongyloidea 402
Ay
Parajilaraides; Metastrangyloidea 395
Paraheteroiyphlum; Ascaridoidea 388
Paralemdana; Filatioidea 391
Paraleptus; Physalopteroidea 396
Paramacropastrongylus; Strongyloidea 402
Paranisakis; Ascaridoidea 388
Paraphyarvngostrongylus,; Strangyloidea 402
Pararugopharvnx; Strongyloides 402
Faraseuraluny, Seuratoidea 397
Parastrongyloides, Strongyloididae 404
Parathelandros; Oxyuroidea 394
Pardustrostrongylus; Trichostrangyloidea 40%
Paraustroxyuris; Oxyuroidea 395
Parazoniolaimus; Strongyloidea 402
Paryseria; Acuarioidea 387
Passalurus; Oxyuroidea 395
Patricialina; Trichostrongyloidea 407, 408
Peramelistrongylus; Trichostrongyloidea 408
Pharyngodon; Oxyuroidea 395
Pharyngostrongylus, Strongyloidea 402, 403
Phascolostrangylus; Strongyloidea 403
Philometra; Dracunculoidea 390
Phocascaris; Ascaridoidea 388
Physaloptera; Physalopteroidea 396
Piratuba; Filarioidea 392
Pontonema; Enoplidae 386
Popovasirongylus; Strongyloidea 403
Porracaecum; Ascaridoidea 389
Poterostrongvius; Strongyloides 403
Potaraxyuris,; Oxyuroidea 395
Provumallanus; Camallanoidea 389
Pracyrnea; Habronematoidea 392
Profilarinema; Trichostrongyloidea 408
Proleptus; Physalopteroidea 396
FProtospirura; Spiruroidea 398
Pseudaprocta; Aproctoidea 388
Rhahdias; Rhabditoidea 396
Rhabdochona: Thelazoidea 405
Rictularia, Rietularoidea 397
Rictularina; Rictularoidea 397
Riouxgolvania; Muspiceoidea 395
Rugopharvax; Strongyloidea 403
Saurofilaria; Filariaidea 392
Seuratia; Acuanoidea 387
Seuratinema; Seuratoidea 397
Seurechina; Seuratoidea 397
Skrjabinodon; Oxyuroidea 395
Skrjabinoptera; Physalopteroidea 396
Skejabinura; Seuratoidea 397
Spinilectus; Habronematoidea 394
Sptronoura; Cosmocercoidea 389
Spirostrangyvlus; Strongyloidea 403
Sprattellus; Trichostrongyloidea 408
Sprattia; Filarioidea 391
Stammerinema; Acuarioidea 387
Steineria; Monhysteridae 386
Skegophorus, Acuarioidea 387
Stellocaronema; Habronematoidea 394
Stomachus; Ascaridoidea 389
Strongyloides; Strongyloididae 404
Subulura; Subuluroidea 405
Symplocostomella; Enoplidae 386
Synhimantus; Acuarioidea 387
Synhimantus (Dispharynx); Acuarioidea 387
Syphacia; Oxyuroidea 396
Tanqua; Gnathostomatoidea 392
Terranova; Ascaridoidea 389
Tetrabothriostrongylus; Trichostrongyloidea 40%
Tetrameres; Habronematoidea 393, 394
Thelandros; Oxyuroidea 396
Thelazia; Thelazoidea 405
Theracostoma,; Enoplidae 386
Thylonema; Strongyloidea 403
Thylostrangvlus; Strongyloidea 404
Trichostrongylus; Trichostrongyloidea 408
Trigonostonenia; Strongyloidea 404
Uneinaria; Ancylostomatoidea 387
Vagrifilaria; Filarioidea 392
Vieutera; Habronematoidea 394
Woodwardostrongylus; Strongyloidea 404
Woalleya; Trichostrongyloidea 405, 408
Zoniolaimus; Strongyloidea 404
REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF THE FROGS OF THE MAGELA CREEK
SYSTEM, NORTHERN TERRITORY
BY MICHAEL H. TYLER, GRAEME A. CROOK AND MARGARET DAVIES
Summary
The Magela Creek system occupies the eastern fringe of the Northern Territory floodplain, and the
adjacent escarpment country. Twenty-four species of frogs occupy this area.
REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF THE FROGS OF THE MAGELA CREEK SYSTEM,
NORTHERN TERRITORY
by
MICHAEL J. TYLER, GRAEME A, CROOK AND MARGARET DAVIES
Department of Zoology, University of Adelaide, Box 498 G.P.O., Adelaide, South Australia 5001.
ABSTRACT
TYLER, M, J,, CROOK, G, A. & DAVUES, M , 1983. Reproducuve
biology of the frogs of the Magela Creek System, Northern
Termitory. Ree. S. dust. Mus. 18 (18); 415-440,
The Magela Creck system occupies the eastern fringe
of the Nerthern Territory floodplain, and the adjacent
escarpment country. Twenty-four species of frogs
occupy this area,
We have examined facets of the reproductive biology
of the frog fauna over two entire wet seasons. Data
are recorded on the onset, duration and termination
of activity, calling and breeding, and are correlated
with temperature and relative humidity. Most species
breed ai the onset of the wet season before the flood-
plain is completely inundated.
For each species the eggs and form of the spawn
clump are described. Developmental history is derived
{rom laboratory observations on spawn transported
to Adelaide, Tadpoles are described and illustrated at
various stages of their development, and growth curves
are plotied.
Details of observations on activity are recorded.
Several species bask in the sun and attain body tem-
peratures of up to 36,4°C,
Fecundity and reproductive modes are platted. We
note limited reproductive diversity and high selective
advantage in abbreviation of the developmental span.
Introduction
Very few studies have been undertaken in Australia
on diverse anuran communities, With the exceptions
of the unpublished observations. of Straughan (1966)
in eastern Queensland, and Humphries’ (1979) study
near Canberra, A.C.T., emphasis to date has centred
upon interaction between particular congeneric com-
ponents within communities,
With the support of the Supervising Scientist for
the Alligator Rivers Region we undertook a study of
the frog fauna of a portion of the floodplains and
adjacent escarpment in the Northern Territory from
October 1978 to April 1979 and October 1979 to
March 1980. (Tyler and Crook, 1980),
The principal objectives of the study were to deter-
mine which species were likely to colonise the uranium
mining, sites there (in particular the retention ponds
and tailings dams) and, further, the nature of skeletal
abnormalities in the populations. Such data would
permit an assessment to be made of the value of frogs
as indicator organisms for monitoring the long-term
impact of uranium mining,
Atihe commencement of the study six of the species
now known to occur at the site were undescribed,
and so our early efforts concentrated upon establishing
ihe composition of the fauna, Similarly the spawn
and tadpoles of 21 of the 24 species were unknown,
In consequence we were obliged to concentrate activ-
ities upon fundamental descriptive studies of life his-
tories, and it was ocither possible nor a component
of the contract to examine community structures in
any detail,
Because the study site included floodplain and
escarpment, it embraced the two exiremes of habitat
that occur in the northern portion of the Northern
Terntory, and potentially at least appeared to permit
extrapolation of results 1o more distant areas.
The study area experiences striking climatic
extremes with marked winter dry seasons, and summer
wet seasons. Here we describe the reproductive habiis
of the frog fauna, describe the embryonic and larval
morphology and examine the reproductive regimes in
an area where most species have a limited breeding
season,
Description of Study Site
Magela Creek is a tributary of the East Alligator
River, Northern Territory, located approximately 230
km east of Darwin (Fig, 1). Magela Creek drains the
western periphery of the Armhemland Plateau, and
the adjacent, low-lying floodplain, and flows only in
the wet season. The term “Magela Creek system’ is
used 10 embrace the drainage area, which represents
an interface of ecologically divergent zones.
Our studies were centred at the Ranger uranium
mining site at Jabiru located at 24.5 m above sea
level. The majority of our observations were made
within a 30-km radius, with the extreme of that range
being north towards the East Alligator River (Fig, |),
416
MELVILLE
BATHURST
ISLAND
REC. 8. AUST. MUS., 18 (18): 415-440
elpril, LON
@ OENPELL!
CANNON HILL
FIG. 1. Study site within the Magela Creek System, Northern
Terntory.
The soils are diverse, but their significance as a
factor influencing frog distribution is associated with
porosity, and the extent to which they can be pene-
trated by the fossorial species,
There is a lack of uniformity in the nomenclature
and delineation of plant communities in the area
surrounding Magela Creek (Christian & Aldrick, 1977;
Williams, 1979). The system that we have adopted is
applicable to frog communities, and involves the fol-
lowing seven units, each of which is meaningful in
an ecological sense, and significant in the diversity
and chronological sequence of breeding sites occurring
there, Data on dominant plant species within the
units are from Christian & Aldrick (1977),
1. Sandstone scrub and woodland in escarpment
The breeding sites on the escarpment vary from
pools on the open rock face (Fig. 2A) to streams
through deep crevices in the sandstone. Tadpoles have
been found in shallow depressions on exposed rock
faces, where the water temperatures reach up to 45°C,
and where there is little aquatic algal growth. The
pools fill with rainwater early in the wet season, and
are then used as breeding sites. Further storms cause
overflowing, and water runs over the rocks and into
small, scrub-lined streams which flow only during
these storms, For the remainder of the time the stream
beds are a series of shallow, isolated pools among
sandstone rocks with spinifex, sedges and wiry grasses
along the banks. The streams extend into deeper,
sandy-floored streams (eroded from the sandstone),
which persist for much longer after the wet season
has ended. The narrow gorges created by these streams
are often very deep and have vertical faces, There is
low light intensity and the water is cold (<10°C).
The larger streams support a woodland including
Eucalyptus dichromophloia, E. phoenicea, and E.
miniata, smaller trees Owenia, Xanthostemon and
Erythrophloeum with wiry grasses and spinifex in the
understorey,
2, Sandstone rainforest remnants
These relict forests differ from the woodlands
through the domination of an undescribed myrtaceous
evergreen tree species up to 22m high. Other non-
eucalypt trees are present; the understorey is sparse,
and the leaf litter is thick and moist. Such forests
occur in the broken terrain or sandstone plateau and
escarpment, usually in narrow gorges at the base of
the escarpment, The streams usually have defined
channels with rocky bottoms, and are permanent (Fig.
2B). Frogs utilize the pools in small side streams
which flow only after storms.
REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF THE FROGS OF THE MAGELA CREEK SYSTEM
FIG, 2. Habitat types: (a) Pool on rockface in sandstone escarp-
ment, Birndu; (6) Remnant rainforest, Radon Creek: (c) Open
sclerophyll forest at foot of escarpment, Birndu; (d) Inundated
grassland.
3. Open sclerophyll forest
The open forest is dominated by Eucalyptus tetro-
donta and EF. miniata with the occasional Erythro-
phloeum. The understorey is varied including
Livistona, Xanthostemon, Planchonia, Buchanania,
Grevillea, Melaleuca and Acacia. Annual and perennial
grasses are also present (Fig. 2C). In the wet season
shallow depressions in this woodland provide breeding
sites for several frog species. Heavy storms inundate
the whole forest floor, so creating many microhabitats
in which frogs abound.
4. Inundated grasslands
In the open sclerophyll forest and along the creeks
are large areas predominated by annual and perennial
grasses (Fig. 2D), These areas have sandy sail, and
any depressions fill with water early in the wet season
providing breeding sites for several frog species. Inun-
dation of these areas occurs once the wet season has
set in (usually in early January). More frog species
then utilize the areas of shallow water outside the
deeper depressions.
5. Fringes of billabongs
The main body of water of the billabongs is not a
significant habitat for frogs. Of greater significance
are the pools and grassy areas on the fringes among
the Melaleuca and Pandanus (Fig. 3A). These areas
fill with water early in the wet season and predatory
fishes are excluded for long enough for tadpoles to
complete metamorphosis.
6. Floodplains
These are large expanses of sedgeland which are
inundated for two to six months of the year (Fig. 3B).
The principal plant genera there are Cyperus, Scirpus,
Eleocharis, Fairena and Sesbania with some prasses.
A wide variety of herbaceous plants and water lilies
occur in areas where there is inundation for six to
eight months, The frogs usually inhabit the edges of
the floodplains, and occupy small islands of rock and
vegetation when the floodplains are inundated.
7, Artificial pools, borrow pits, ponds etc,
Buffalo wallows are important breeding sites on the
floodplains and inundated grasslands in the early
months of the wet season. Man-made borrow pits
beside the roads are important throughout the wet
season, providing shallow temporary pools in areas
where such pools would not occur naturally (Tyler.
1979). The soil is gravelly and the vegetation is sparse.
418 REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (18): 415-440 April, 1983
FIG. 3. Habitat types: (a) Billabong fringe; (6) Floodplain from
A air (c) iis airstrip with temporary pools; (d) Retention
‘ond No. 2.
The large cleared areas around the pools provide a During the study period there was substantial alter-
larger number of potential calling sites for males than ation to the structure of the site and hence to the
the surrounding open forest. Dams, drainage ditches area in which we undertook observations. Principal
and even pools on the road surface are used as breed- changes affecting frog breeding sites were the comple-
ing sites by some species (Fig. 3C). Indeed any dis- tion of construction and the filling of the retention
turbance of the environment causing the formation ponds and the tailings dam, so increasing the area of
of pools increases the breeding potential of frogs in static water by more than | km?, and the grading of
the area, and tailings dams, retention ponds, siltation the airstrip which eliminated numerous shallow pools.
pools and other earthworks have to be considered in 36
a similar sense (Fig. 3D). MEAN MONTHLY MAXIMA
The rainfall follows a distinct seasonal pattern. There
is a wet season generally heralded in late October 354
with occasional showers in the late afternoon or eve-
ning, but the greatest volume of rain occurs from
December to March. The maximum rainfall recorded
at Jabiru Airstrip in one month since 1971 is
767.9 mm in February 1980. Annual totals there range
from 1121 mm to 2282 mm. As indicated above,
during the study the 1979-80 period was atypical
because there was no rain from June to September, 28
followed by a late onset of the wet season and then 1 My aac.
the record February falls, leading ultimately to the
second highest annual total.
30-
4
TEMPERATURE (°C)
MEAN MONTHLY MINIMA
20
Shade temperature maxima and minima were
39.9°C in October 1979 and 14.1°C in August 1979. — . ; .
Mean monthly maxima and minima at Jabiru Airstrip Qe ROE FE i Wh eR IN tad
during the study period are depicted in Figure 4.
FIG. 4. Temperature variation at Jabiru during the study period.
REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF THE FROGS OF THE MAGELA CREEK SYSTEM
Methods
Ficld observations were undertaken during the wet
seasons by G. A. Crook, He resided at Jabiru fram
October 1978 to April 1979, and from October 1979
to March 1980. M. J, Tyler visited the study area in
Navember-December 1977, November 1978, February
1979, October 1979, November-December 1979, and
February 1980. Supplementary field assistance was
provided on various occasions by M. Davies, A. A,
Martin and J. Brooks,
Initially the field programme concentrated upon
establishing the nature of the fauna, leading to the
collection of 24 specics, of Which six were hitherto
undescribed, Biological data recorded included surtace
activity, calling activity of males, spawning, the phys-
ical form of spawn clumps, and the physical appear-
ance of the tadpoles. Water temperatures at brecding
sites were recorded with a Wesco rapid-reading ther-
mometer (reading 0-50°C) and relative humidity
measured with a Zeal Whirling Psychrometer,
Spawn and tadpoles were obtained at night and
Iransported to Adelaide by air in insulated containers.
Upon arrival at the University of Adelaide the spec-
imens were transferred to 4 constant temperature lab-
oratory maintained at 30° +0.5°C. Spawn and small
quantities of tadpoles were transferred to white
‘Advance’ plastic containers of IL capacity. Denser
aggregations were maintained in 5L capacity all-glass
aquaria. The cultures were aerated sufficiently to cle-
vate oxygen levels, without reducing the water tem-
perature.
Water was changed daily. The water used was passed
through a commercial softener and filter, followed by
passage through an activated carbon dechlorinator
and a bacterial filter’ Water was allowed to stand in
the plastic containers or glass aquaria for 24 hours
prior to use to equilibrate to room temperature. The
light regime of the room was controlled and seasonally
adjusted 10 that at Jabiru.
Tadpoles were fed on washed and boiled lettuce
leaves, Tadpoles were sarnpled regularly and preserved
in Tyler’s (1962) tadpole fixative. Selection of speci-
mens for preservation followed ihe attainment of the
progressive developmental stages of Gosner (1960),
Subsequently specimens were measured with a micro-
scope eyepicce micrometer or dial callipers to an
accuracy of 0.01 mm.
A representative collection of the species studied
has been deposited in the South Australian Museum.
410
IDENTIFICATION OF SPECIES
Species Composition
Three families of frogs occur in the Magela Creek
sysiem. They represent the Hylidae (2 genera, 16
species), Leptodactylidae (5 genera, 7 species) and
Microhylidae (1 genus, 1 species): a total of 24 species.
Of that total only 1wo species: Linria personata Tyler,
Davies & Martin and Upero/eia arenicola Tyler, Dav-
ies & Martin are currently known only from that
area. Most of the remainder are widely distributed
across northern Australia,
Distribution and Abundance
In Table | we have plotted the species com position
of the fauna, together with our assessment of relative
abundance based on the frequency with which rep-
resentatives were encountered, ‘Absent’ indicates our
failure to observe or hear a species in a particular
area during the entire study; ‘Rare’ includes 1-10
observations; ‘Common’ involves at least 25 sightings,
whereas ‘Abundant’ indicates the presence of a species
in large numbers on any night within the period that
we found the species to be active.
Identification
To permit identification in the field we have pre-
pared dichotomous keys to spawn, tadpoles and adults.
To assist the identification procedures we have divided
the total fauna into two groups—the species found
on ihe escarpment, and those found elsewhere (which
we term ‘lowland’ for want of a more appropriate all-
embracing word). Within the ‘escarpment’ category
we have included spectes such as Limnodnastes
ornatus and L. conyexiusculus, which are in no way
adapted to that environment, but occasionally they
penetrate its fringe.
Excellent colour photographs of many of the species
appear in handbooks of the frogs of Australia by
Barker and Grigg (1977) and by Cogger (1979). How-
ever, because there are so many additional species
not included in those publications, and confusion
about the use of some names, we recommend that
their photographs be used to confirm identifications
reached here, rather than as primary identification
sources,
(a) KEY TO FROG EGGS FOUND LPON THE ESCARPMENT
|. Spawn terrestrial, laid in leaf litter. Sphenaphryne rabusta
Spawn laid in water... , . A Pak — * 2
2. Spawn in form of foam nest me = - 3
Spawn not in form of foam nest... — are = \
3, Eggs slightly pigmented, or unpigmented, foam nest deposited
in concealed sites; foam persists for several days _ 4
Eggs black with white vegetal pole, foam nest floating on
surface of puols; foam nest collapses within six
hours Limnodynastes ornattts
$20
REC. 8. AUST. MUS.,
18 (18); 415-440
April, 198s
TABLE 1; DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF THE FROG FAUNA OF THE MAGELA CREEK AREA,
2 a % z
& = Fe)
33 Og 2 i 5
as ‘ 4 = g wes
az a ee gs
0 Absent us 2 Bb S = a 2 g
| Rare 22 v4 z s ap ‘a ae
2 Common ES Bg = x 8 = 38
3 Abundant aa Se z 5 = 3 e.%
as 2 & = a = S ts
“we we = ° baa] c <6.
Litaria biedler ..... 7 0 0 2 0 3 2 0
EB. faerulea (000 6 ee ee cee et Fe ee UHH et ' 2 2 1 ! ! ] 0)
L. ooplandl 0.2 ce ne eee eee tee 3 2 0 Q 0) 0 0
L dahlit.. 0 0 i 0 2 3 |
CORRES SS nip og see eh melons 7 ee ee 0 0 | 0) 2 0) 3
Lo sp. ar. latopalmata —- te itl stemtch wales 5 Mtn eh eee 0 0 3 0 2 | 3
L. mweiriand 2... 3 3 0 0 Q) 0 0)
L. wicrobelas 2s 2 e e eb Er ete ee Q 0 i} 0 3 2 0
ey eo Ee a Pe ee 0 0 3 2 2 0 1
L. personatd oy oe eens q 0 0 0) i) 0 0
L. rothit 0 0 2 | 2 2 2
Lube: nck bee e's Fete Ss SS - 0 0 2 | 2 2 3
Ro farrtiets 6b ice ose 5} bog eters sia 0 0 3 0) 2 1 3
L. wotjulumie FAB YS — (ei rele wees PORTS Perse ye \ 2 2 l 0 0 0 2
('yclorana australis . : 0 0 2 i 2 2 3
(, IaMBIPeS - bison seas: -- ia) () 1 0 ! 1 3
Limaody’ nastes convexiusculus , 1 0 2 0 2 3 0
L ormatus...... rare & Aiewil RAPS AD 2 0 2 l 0 0 3
Notaden melanoscaphus rw Re Ala eee o- 0 0 3 3 0 0 Q
Mewistolous lignarius ...... 1 lla tclamal et 2 2 0) 0 0 0 Q
Rantdellu bilingud 2.64 0 te ee ee 0 0 3 1 2 2 0
Upernleia arenicola , TE ok pertain Se SR he 1 0 0 0 0 Q) Oo
Uperoleta inundata 9 >: wf see olla rie we totes 0 0 3 2 0 0 0
Sphenophryne robust oy cpp 2 eee ete 0 2 0 0 2 0) 0
in
_ Spawn floating on surface
. Dark ‘brown;
_ Foam nest under boulders in streambeds or pools, eggs creamy
yellow ...., . Megistoalotis lignartus
Foam nest in small hollows among grass tussocks; eggs
white... _ Limnodynastes convextusculus
. Large number of! browrypaiite eggs Jaid as surface
film... a Litoria caerulea
Eggs laid singly 01 or in small clumps ie pee: ee oe |
L, wot/ulumensis
Spawn below surface of water rate
. Spawn laid as small clumps or film firmly attached to sandstone
rock face _L. metriana
Spawn laid as single cpgs or in small clumps on bottom of
rock pools. ; _ L. eoplandi
The spawn of Uperoleia arenicoln and Litoria personata 1s
unknown,
(hb) KEY TO TADPOLES FOUND UPON THE ESCARPMENT
| With distinctive gold or yellow dorso-lateral stripes
. 2, pecsnnam
Lacking gold ¢ or yellow dorso-lateral stripes » : cow
. Body flattened dorso-laterally, eyes dorsal, narrowly stivarated:
Papillary border widely separated superiorly
Limnodynasles ofnatus
Body not flauened dorso-laterally, eyes dorso-lateral -. 3
. Black colour’ , Poe FNS) te, Ses siotd oF
Brown colour Pee Leo
Papillary border narrowly separated titpedionti sari dapillac;
4/3, 5/3, 6/3 labial tooth rows; strong horny
beak... ween _. Megistolotis lignarius
Papillary border widely separated superiorly; large papillae;
5/3 labial tooth rows; horny beak weakly developed
. Limnodynastes convexiusculus
conspicuous white patch near base of
abdomen , : Litoria coplandi
Lacking white patch near hase of abdomen Pe 6
. Papillary border widely separated superiorly; horny beak rather
weakly developed. Tail fin lightly pigmented; tail muscle
pigmentation in two stripes: one lateral halfway along tail,
one along dorsal edge - Litoria caerulea
Horny beak strongly developed. Upper tail fin pigmented.
Tail muscle heavily pigmented 7
7. Tadpoles small (<26 mm); papillary border siarnowly separated
superiorly, Ventral surface dark, becoming lighter. Dark
brown stripe along dorsal edge of tail muscle
1h L. meiriana
Tadpoles ‘medium-sized (<45 mm); papillary border separated
superiorly. Ventral surface light from stage 26
Mase. - : L. wotjulumensis
It is assumed that Sphenophryne robusta has no free-swimming
tadpole.
(c) KEY TO ADULT FROGS FOUND UPON THE ESCARPMENT
_ Green or olive; large (up to 110 mm); expanded discs on toes,
conspicuous toe webbing . Litoria caerulea
Not green or olive .
. Tympanum not visible
Tympanum distinctly visible © -- -2) psc
4
. Very small (up to 25 mm length)
Size within range of 25-75 mm. — .. ath 5
. Brown with dark stripe on side of head sometimes extending
along sides; cylindrical toe discs. Found in leaf litter
only - ne Sphenophryne robusta
Brown to slate grey with orange parotoid glands; no toe discs.
Metatarsal tubercle enlarged. Found in sand
streambeds .... . Uperdleta arenicola
. Inner metatarsal tubercle enlarged; usually sandy with darker
back patterns, rounded snout; <45 mm in length. Slight
web on toes ._-. _ Limnodynastes ornatis
{nner metatarsal tubercle not enlarged: grey or brown with
dark mottling on dorsum, slightly elongate snout, up to
65 mm in tenets Conspicuous cream supralabial gland, No
webbing, - : _ L. convexiusculus
. Robust; large, prominent, oval inner, but no outer metatarsal
tubercle. Toe discs absent. Hindlimbs short; males have
black nuptial spines. . .. Megistolotis fignartus
Not robust; no large, prominent, oval: inner metatarsal tubercle,
Toe discs present. Long hindlimbs -. 200 )..5)....,,7
nm
. Brown, ovidiameter |.2
» Ovum diameter |.6-|.9 aim .
. In small clumps (of <
. Very
REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF THE FROGS OF THE MAGELA CREEK SYSTEM
- Feet with trace of webbing. Small (<35 mm). Conspicuous
head stripe. Toe dise expanded - Lituria personata
Hindlimbs with conspicuous webbing. ..--. _., &
. Conspicuous head sinipe finishing midway along body, toe
discs small. Large se (up to 70 mm SV length)
L. wotjlumensis
Toe dings well developed. No head ‘stripe _ a oe:
. Small (<25 mm), diurnal and nocturnal. Heavy mottled dark
brown band on legs, dorsal pattern . L. meiriana
Up to 40 mm, nocturnal, Mottled dorsal pattern, large inner
metatarsal tubercle ee wi L. caplandi
fd) KEY TO LOWLAND FROG EGGS
| Terrestrial, found an leaf litter in Melaleuce swamps
ee aL be . Sphenaphryne robusta
Deposited in water-_ . SHU Sr Loko ee sot UP ene
. Deposited in foam nest . - ge re
Not deposited in foam nest _- f.- E. aB
. Barely pigmented: foam nest in cbaenled ; areas in inundated
grassland; foam persists for several days
Limurodvnastes vonvextusculus
Black with white vegetal pole; foam nest conspicuous, floaling
on surface of pools; foam nest collapses within six hours
. 1. ernatus
. In large loosely anached tiurnps on bottom of pools - 5
Not in large loosely atiached clumps. --—- poe
-1,5 mm; capsule diameter 1,9-2.5 mm
. Cvelorana longipes
Brown, ovidiameter I. 3-1, bn mm; = capsule diameter 2 2.5-2.2 mm
ee C. australis
. Laid Siriely ot orm small efutaps on bottom of pools in inundated
ermassland..,, _. Uperaleia inundata
Not taid singly or in ‘small clumps on bottom of pools in
inundated grassland - to. Fhe oO. @
. Laid as free-floating clumps. se 4:
Nat laid as free-floating clumps 10
. Capsule large (6.1 mm); brown and white egg; three jelly
envelopes Litoria (nermns
Capsule medium (4. 5-5. 4 mm); ‘dark brown and white egg 9
_ L. wothlumensis
Ovum diameter 1.3-1.4 mim = L. rothii
= 20 epps) attached lo yegelauion li
Not in small clumps fof < 20 eggs) attached wo
vepetalion 6. uy, e -- AS
small ovum (0,8-0,9 fairl, Broa and cream
f..5-.3 ie Pe ae _ L. micrabelos
Small (1.0-|.2 mm) dark brown and cream .--,..,-_,.12
- Ovum diameter 1.0 mm; capsule 2,5 mm (1.9-2,5 mm); three
jelly envelopes - L. hicular
Ovum diameter |,2 mm; capsule dianeter 1.7 mm; one jelly
envelope Ranidella hilingua
Surface film in shallow water (<5 em) in inundated grassland,
Black animal pole, white vegetal. pole; discrete jelly envelope
around ovum with loose sheet of jelly enclosing all
eges ., Notaden melanascaphuy
Surface film in ephemeral o ar temporary Bane, Animal pole
not black. Discrete jelly capsules - _- 7 14
. Dark brown foe ce B 15
Pale brown ,, 14... LL wid lt
. Surface film of 200-350 eggs, capsule 2.2-2.9 mm
..., Literta caertilea
Surface film or clump; =< 100 eggs laid: capaule 3.2-3.7 mm
416
. Ovum dhimetér 1,041 3 min; thee "jelly envelopes
J, nasuta
Ovum diameter 1.4 mm; two jelly envelopes L. forniert
- Ovum diameter 1.0-1,1 mm; capsule 1.9-2.3 mm
L. rubelle
Ovum diameter |.2~!.3 mm; capsile 3.4-3.9 mm
L. sp. nr. datepaltnata
_
os
. Black,
, Tooth raws vary 2/3 to 6/3:
. At
. Tail muscle pigmentation not in broad bands,
42
(2) KEY TO LOWLAND TADPOLES
to 70 mm), 5/3 labial tooth rows
a. . Limnddynastes cunverctuyculyy
Not black . og et ee 2
eyes dorsal, narrowly separated:
body dorso-ventrally flattened . L, ornelus
Tooth rows always 2/3; eyes dorso-lateral,—.. 4
large ne
i Large (up to 70 mm). Bulbous bodies, usually dense and active
in aggregations —. : fpes ts 14 4
Medium-sized (up ta §0 mm). Not in dense and acrive:
ageregalions ; 6
. Lacking nasal groove, ‘Dorsal patlern strong “mouling, tail
muscle with broad lateral stripe and along dorsal edge,
Stnped back pattern develops in stage 41. Papillary barder
widely separated superiorly Litaria dahl
Nasal groove in stages 32-41% tail THuscle mottled; papillary
border not widely separated superiorly. 5
stage 41 back pattern with well-defined dark
patches Cyclorana longipes
At stage 41 back lacking dark patches: ansaiy rows of
smal] glands present F . aayiralis
Papillary border separated inferiorly 7
Papillary border not separated infenorly 8
Papillae large in lateral area. Absent superiorly and just nwo
inferiorly, flanking short third labial tooth row; homy beak
strong, ventral surface while. Small (<25 mm)
Ranidella bilineua
Papillae large, widely separated superiorly, separated inferiorly;
horny beak weakly developed: ventral surface motiled red-
purple and white. Smal! (<34 mm)
Uperoleta inundatu
. Third lower row of labial teeth reduced to median structore
of approx, 10 teeth |, _ # 4
Third lower row of labial teeth ‘not reduced . 10
. Papillae large, border not well<leveloped and widely separated
superiorly, Horny beak very weakly developed. Tadpoles
< 38 mm in length, Dark brown dorsum, Ventral surface
dark brown becoming lighter. Very shallow water in inun-
dated grassland wee... Notaden melanoscaphus
Pagallae large, border well-developed and separated superiorly,
Horny beak well-developed. Tadpoles up to 58 mm long:
early stages pale yellow dorsum with dark brown dorsal
and dorso-lateral stripes: during later development (after
27) the stripes fade and the dorsal and lateral surfaces
become marled brawn with the pale yellow background
Dorsal surface of head becomes flattened, In temporary
pools , Liloria rothii
~ Conspicuous band of white muscle on posterior of abdomen
until stage 38. At 38 white patch develops just pusterior
of cye and develops into broad white stripe from eye to
groin. Another white stripe antedor and belaw eye passing
beneath eye and ends behind shoulder, Tadpole mol
tled brown early, uniform brawn on dorsum
later. . L. hivolar
No conspicuous band of “white muscle on posterior of
abdomen A he ' a nt, lI
<25 mm 12
Tail muscle pigmentation in broad bands, very small (=< 20
mm): horny beak weakly developed. Papillary border widely
separated. Dark dorsal pattern and dark head and lateral
stripe ee — bo ntierobelos
. Papillary border widely separated superiorly; homy beak rather
weakly developed, tail fin lightly pigmented: tail muscle
pigmentation in two stripes: one lateral halfway along tail
one along dorsal edge - L, vaeriuled
Papillae separated — superiorly; horny beak = well
developed — - wT Baote: =f. 13
- Val muscle has three stapes: one lateral, one
on dorsal and on ventral edges. Tail fin edge
becomes darker with deyelopment. Small tadpolis
(<= 35 mm), In stage 4i broad. white lateral stripe and
harrow vertebral stnpe appear White patch anterior to
and below eye at's ac Ly rubettes
422
ios)
LO.
. Inner metatarsal tubercle enlarged. ,
‘Tadpoles mottied brown. Tail muscle mottled brown. Up to
50 mm. Ground-dwelling hylids (L. wolulurmensis, L.
nasuta, tC. torniers, L. sp. nr lalopalmete, L. irlermiis),
Further specific identification is only possible from stage 41
onwards as follaws:
at stage df
(i) Toes Strongly webbed —— ii
Tow webbing not well developed - il
(ii) Stmped back pattern, long hindlimbs with Jonpitudinal
stripes _£. Hasulet
Brown back paltern, broad conspicuous dark head stipe
: L, wotpilumensis
Gil) Cankinvans dark beta stripe on posterior edge of tibia
L. tormer!
No continuous stripe i inermis and L. sp. nr fatopalmata
Specific identification of these species is only possible after
stage 46.
At stage 46
Warty dorsal surface, indistinct head stnpe, some flecking on
the dorsal surface L. inermis
Smooth dorsal skin, distinct head stripe
L. sp. ar /atepalmata
(f) KEY TO LOWLAND FROGS
at
Inner metatarsal tubercle not enlarged
. Medium to large size (greater than 35 mm), Outer metatareit
tubercle absent of not enlarged . . 4
Small (to 35 mm). Enlarged outer metatarsal tubercle, Stout-
bodied: short stocky limbs; conspicuous parotoid glands
and glands at comer of mouth; grey with highly vanable
dark brown to red dorsal markings. Found in inundated
grassland Uperoleja inundata
. Inner melatarsal tubercle: nor black... .., 4
Inner metatarsal tubercle black. Rounded snout. ‘Stout body,
short robust limbs. Pale brown with dark brown dorsal
markings. When seized, exudes copious quantities of yellow
sticky secretion from Jarge number of dorsal glands. Found
in inundated grassland Notaden melanascaphus
. Belly smooth, Rounded snout, Medium-sized (up 19 45 mm),
Sandy with variable dark dorsal markings. Toes one-third
webbed. 'Tympanum not visible, Conspicuous lateral fringes
on toes, Males have nuptial pads on first two fingers.
Calling occurs while free-floatmg in water
Limnodynastes ornatus
Belly granular. Stlightiy clongated snout. Large size
(50-110 mm), Toes slightly webbed) Tympanum visible,
Male nuptial pads on first finger only. — oecars on
land .... .45, . A ssi
. Medium-sized (to 55 mira “Well-defined ‘dark patches on
dorsal surface, usually with a vertebral stripe
Cyelorana. longipes
Very large (to 110 mm). Pale brown with patehes. A contrasting
dark brown head stripe from. snout to shoulder
a Tr. or C. australts
. Toe discs Conspicuous—expanded to ewice width of
digit eee? el eee ee en
Toe discs inconspicuous 10
. Small (< 30 mm) and green; thin brown stripe along flanks;
white stripe present from nose to groin Litoria biealor
Medium to large size (35-110 mm) se B
. Brown or grey, 35-60 mm snout to vent Jength ere
Very large green or olive oe an yo 110 mm). Common
around dwellings . L. caerulea
. Large (to 60 mm). Extensive 10 webbing, Yellow and black
markings in the groin and posterior of thigh. Elongate
limbs. |, Co ed rothit
Medium (10 45 mm). Webbing. halfway up toes. Broad head
stripe from nose 10 pheaider: somelimes continuing along
flanks. Short, robust limbs . *, L, nibella
Small (< 25 mm) . tino mine cei pen.
Medium to large (=> 30 mm) | 13
RECS, AUST, MUS,,
17.
18 (18); 415-440
. Toes at Icast partly webbed ,
. Toes fully webbed: large (to 85 mm),
. Striped dorsal pattern absent -
April. 1YNd
. Slender body: granular belly . -- 12
Robust body; smooth belly; mottled brown: dark head stripe
occasionally continuing along flanks, toe discs small and
cylindrical, tympanum not visible; no webbing on toes;
found in leaf liter in Melaleuca swamps
Sphenophryne robusta
Upto 25 mm, Brown with variable dark markings on back,
No Loe discs. Unwebbed toes -- _ Ranidella hilingue
Up to 20) mm; brown with darker lateral stmpes. dark eye
stripe From nose 10 midway alang flank; beneatlr this, while
stripe from nose lo shoulder. Toe discs present. Toes slightly
webbed - Litoria micrahelos
; .
‘Yoes unwebbed; large (lo 65 mm); grey or olive with discrete
dark patches on dorsal surface, conspicuous cream supral-
abial gland; stout body; tympanum not visible. Found in
inundated grassland and floodplains
Limnodynastes converiusculus
1B)
Toes less than fully webbed; medium (to 50 mm) 16
. Up to X5mm) green with brown and olive back markings.
cream patches on posterior of thigh, Belly smooth and
white. Eyes prominent and dorsal. Found on flovd plain:
mostly aquatic . . . Litoria dahlit
Up to 70 mm, brown, contrasting broad dark head stnipe
continuing along sides of body, Belly granular and cream.
Eyes dorso-lateral - 4, L, wotjulumensts
17
Conspicuous brown and white longitudinal stripes on back,
Broad dark head stripe, Streamlined shape with elongated
snout and extremely long legs. Black and yellow markings
on posterior of thigh. Sinipes s and dark patches on legs.
Toes half webbed. _ LL. nasuta
Continuous dark brown stripe on antenor of tibia: red-brown
dorsal surface in breeding season; pale brown la grey, dry
season LL. tarnilert
No continuous tibial snipe brown dorsal surface in breeding
season - .
. Usually indistinct head swipe! warty dorkatii some molting,
thigh markings not prominent, Males call from open areas
usually on steeply sloping banks L. inermis
Distinct head stripe; smooth dorsum; occasional moatiling;
black and yellow markings on posterior of thigh; males call
from open areas among grass lussocks adjacent to water
Th lh eee he a L. sp. nr latwpalmata
ACCOUNT OF SPECIES
Family HYLIDAE
Cyclorana australis (Gray)
The largest frog in the area, C. ausrraliy is robust,
60-100 mm snout Lo vent Jength and a drab grey-
brown. This species is fossorial, spending the day and
dry season underground, usually al the base of trees
or under logs. It is active at night from October to
April, although the number of adults. observed drops
sharply after January, when metamorphosing juveniles
predominate.
Breeding activity: Large numbers of males congregate
early in the wet season. On warm nights dunng and
following rain, they call from areas devoid of vege-
tation or at the base of grass tussocks near water.
Breeding occurs at air temperatures of 24,5-28,5°C,
78.5-96.0% R.A. AL deposition sites the water tem-
perature is 31.0-33.5°C and the water depth 5
-100
cm.
REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF THE FROGS OF THE MAGELA CREEK SYSTEM 423
Eggs: Spawn is deposited at the edge of temporary
pools. Initially it floats on the surface, but it sinks to
the floor during early development. The clump frag-
ments when disturbed. Eggs are laid in clumps of up
to 7 000 although 100-1 000 are most common. The
animal pole is dark brown and the vegetal pole white.
Two jelly envelopes surround the ovum. Mean capsule
diameter is 2.5 mm (2.3-2.8 mm) and mean ovum
diameter 1.6mm (1.5-1.8 mm).
Developmental history: Hatching occurs at stage 17
in 1-2 days. The tadpoles become robust with a rotund
body, elongate snout and deep fins (Fig. 5) and are
pale brown or dull grey. The anus is dextral and the
spiracle sinistral. The tooth row formula is 2/3 and
there is a well-developed, elevated border of papillae
surrounding the oral disc. There is a strong horny
beak. The papillary border is separated superiorly by
a broad median gap. A naso-orbital groove is present
at stages 32-41. Stage 37 of Gosner (1960) is inappl-
icable because the metatarsal tubercle appears con-
currently with differentiation of stages 37-38. Tadpoles
attain a length of almost 70 mm at stage 41 (see Fig.
12) [mean 54.8 mm (40.9-68.2)].
Spawn of C. australis and C. longipes are often
mixed, and the tadpoles form dense and very active
aggregations. Tadpoles constantly rise to the surface,
gulp air and then submerge, so producing the impres-
sion of boiling water. The tadpoles prefer the slightly
cooler, deeper water. but low oxygen saturation levels
induce them to rise to the surface.
Metamorphosing juveniles are found from Decem-
ber to April [mean S-V 21.3 mm (19.8-25.4 mm)],
usually at the edge of pools where they feed on insects
and on other frogs. Many juveniles are emerald green.
Notes: Tyler and Martin (1975) described and illus-
trated the tadpole and tadpole mouthparts of C. aus-
tralis but had only poorly preserved series at stages
36-39. Tadpoles of C. australis cannot be distinguished
from those of C. longipes until stage 41 when the
mottled pattern on the dorsum of the latter species
appears.
Cyclorana longipes Tyler and Martin
A robust, fossorial species attaining a maximum
S-V length of 55 mm. Its habits are similar to those
of C. australis, from which it is distinguished morpho-
logically by its smaller size and densely mottled back
pattern.
Breeding activity: Males congregate in large numbers
from November to mid-December. Breeding occurs
at air temperatures of 23.0-28.5°C, 85-96% R.H. At
deposition sites water temperatures range 33.0-40.0°C
and water depth is 5-100 cm.
Eggs: Spawn is deposited on the surface of the water
at the edge of temporary pools in loosely-attached
clumps of 50-2 000 eggs. Eggs sink to the floor in
early development. The animal pole is brown and
FIG. 5. Left lateral view of tadpole of (a) Limnodynastes con-
vexiusculus, (b) L. ornatus, (c) Notaden melanoscaphus,
(d) Cyclorana longipes, (e) C. australis. Scale bar = 5 mm.
424
vegetal pole white. Two jelly envelopes surround the
ovum. Mean capsule diameter is 2.2 mm (1.9-2,5
mm) and mean ovum diameter 1-4 mm (1-2-1.5 mm).
Developmental history; Tadpoles are identical in
form and habits to ©. australis (Fig. 5) but attain a
smaller maximum size al Stage 42; mean 42.3 (32.8-
59.5), Maximum growth occurs dunng stages 25-28
(Fig. 12), extending from a mean of 7.7 mm (6.8-&.3
mm) at stage 24 to 28.2 mm (24.6-30,5 mm) aL stage
28. The tadpoles possess numerous long gill filaments
al Stages 22-24.
At 30°C juveniles metamorphosed after 40 days.
At Jabiru juveniles were collected on 12 December
1978, in an area where pools were not formed until
after | November 1978: a maximum ot 42 days for
complete development. At metamorphosis juveniles
have a mean snout to vent length of 20 mm (14%.1-
21.1 mm).
Litoria bicolor (Gray)
A small, green tree trog bearing a white lateral stripe
an the head and body. Commonly found on vegetation
surrounding billabongs and streams. It 1s a nociurnal
species and spends the day al the base of leaves of
Pandanus and similar situations, Early in the wet
season males call during the day,
Breeding activity: From November to Apnl males
call from the stems of grass, bushes and small trees
inundated by or surrounding water. The nature ol
breeding sites appears io change during the wet scason,
Frogs are found near billabongs in the carly wel season
(October-December) buy later im temporary pools by
the roadside, and in swamps if there are sufficient
calling sites for males. Huge choruses congregate carly
in the wet season, but much fewer males call a1 the
temporary pools. Breeding occurs al air temperatures
of approximately 26°C, 92-96% RH.
Fees; Spawn is deposited in lemporary pools where
there is emergent vegetation. Eggs are small [mean
capsule diameter 2.5 (1.9-2.9 mm), mean ovum diam-
eter |. mim] with a black animal pole and a white
vegetal pole. They are laid below the surface in clumps
of 10-20 eggs, allached to submerged vegetation, Three
iclly envelopes surround the ovum,
Developmental history. The eyes are widely spaced.
the anus dextral and the spiracle simstral (Fig 6)-
Phe dorsam is mottled brown in the curly stages,
Pigmenicion mereasing progressively until, at stage
4). the tadpole is uniform brown, At stage 38 a white
patch appears just posltenor lo the eye and develops
laterally until, at stage 44, iLas a broad while siripe
from the eye to the groim. By stage 4] another white
stripe appears antero-venirally to the eye. passing
beneath it, and terminating just dorsal and posterior
lo the pectoral region. The ventral surface is white in
RC, S., AUST, MUS. 18 (18), 415-440
dpi, L989
these later stages. The tail muscle has stripes of pig-
ment laterally and on the dorsal and ventral edges.
the lail fins becoming increasingly pigmenied with
age, and the edges of the fins very dark. From stages
25-38 a conspicuous band of white muscle 1s present
at the poastenor end of the abdomen. The remainder
of the abdomen is dark brown, The tooth row formula
is 2/3. A well-developed, elevated border of small
papillae, surrounds the oral disc, except for the super
jor margin (Fig, 7), There is a strong horny beak.
Tadpoles attain a maximum length of 40.1 mm at
slage 42 [mean 33.7 (274-40.1)] with maximum
growth occuring between stages 25 and 27 [mean | 1.2
(6.4-19.6) at stage 25 to mean 21,8 (20.3-22.7) at stage
27 (Fig. &)}. At 30°C metamorphosis was completed
in 77 days: no comparative data are available for field
populations,
Litoria caerulea (White)
A large (up to 76 mm S-V), green, tree frog with
well-developed parotaid glands and greatly expanded
finger and toe discs. lt spends the day hidden in
crevices and hollows and is commonly found in
dwellings.
Breeding activity; Ts species does not form large
breeding choruses; males call individually or in small
groups trom exposed, clevated surfaces (e.g. walls,
fences, branches of trees. roadside culverts). Calling
occurs at night during or immediately after rain from
October to March. Breeding occurs fram November
(o February al air temperatures of 24-25°C, R.A.
about 96%.
/gys: Spawn is deposited m small ephemeral pools.
in whieh emergent vegelation may be present or
absent, Water temperature at deposition sites varies
28.0-38.0°C and water depths 3-50 cm, Spawn is laid
as a surface film of brown eggs with white vegetal
poles.. The nurmber of eggs in the clamp is 200-2 000,
Two jelly envelopes surround ihe ovum. Mean capsule
diameter 1.3 mm (1,l-1.4 mm).
Developmental Aistary: Eggs hatch at stage 18, and
atigin a mean lengih of & 1 mm (7.4-8.5 mm) by stage
24, A period of maximum growth follows, the embryo
reaching 28,5 mm (25,6-31.2 mm) by stage 29, Max-
imum size is reached at stage 41 (Fig. 8): mean 41.0
mm (38,6-43.6 mm). Tadpoles are of the typical,
lenuc Liloria type. Byes are widely spaced, anus dextral
und spiracle sinistral. Al stage 22 the tadpoles have
extensive external gills. Tooth row formula is 2/3 and
there is a well-developed, clevated border of large
papillae surrounding the inferior edge of the oral disc
(Fig. 7). The border does not extend superiorly to the
first upper labial tooth row, Tadpoles are mottled
brown with pigmentation increasing as develapment
REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF THE FROGS OF THE MAGELA CREEK SYSTEM 425
proceeds, There are twa brown, caudal stripes: a lateral
one extending halfway along the tail and a second
along the dorsal edge of the muscle for nearly the
length of the tail (Fig. 6). Pigmentation of the tail fin
increases progressively, bul a8 sparse. Ventral surface
dark, becoming progressively lighter with develop-
ment. At 30°C one juvenile metamorphosed after 38
days and measured 18 mm’'S-¥.
Litoria coplandi (Tyler)
A dark-brown frog of up to 40 mm snout to vent
length. [tis found commonly at night on sandstone
boulders in and around slreams in ihe escarpment.
The species aggregate in crevices and in caves in the
sandstone during the dry season.
Breeding activity: Males call from apen, sandstone,
rock Surfaces near water, alter rain from Sepiember
ig December. One of us (M.J.T.) has collected tadpoles
of this species in July in the Kimberley, W.A,, follow-
ing unseasonal rain,
Hees: Eggs have been found singly ar in small
clumps on the floor of shallow rock pools. We lack
data on ovum and capsule size.
Developmental history: Early Stages of development
are unknown. Al laler stages the dark brown tadpoles
can be readily identified because they have a brilliant
white patch at the posterior end of the abdomen. This
patch is.a muscle layer; it becomes less conspicuous
after stage 36 when the entire ventral surface beeomes
white. There is heavy pigmentation of the tail
myotomes over the entire surface posteriorly, but
only over the dorsal half anteriorly (Fig. 6). The tail
fin is hghtly pigmented. 4 naso-orbiial groove appears
al stage 37 but disappears by 41. Anus dextral; spiracle
sinistral. The tooth row formula is 2/3 with a complete.
well-develeped, clevated border of small papiiiae sur-
rounding the oral dise (Fig. 7). The horny beak is
well-developed. Tadpoles attain a length of more than
45 mm. Juveniles metamorphose at a mean of
15.8 mm (13.6-18.8 mm). The duration of develop-
ment is: unknown, but metamorphosing specimens
found on 2) February 1980 were collected in an area
where sufficient amounts of rain had fallen only since
the first days of January: a maximum of 52 days.
Litoria dahlii (Boulenger)
An aquatic species of the floodplain. L. dahlti is a
large frog of up to 70 mm S-V. Itis green with brown
and olive back markings, or so heavily suffused with
brown that the green is restricted 10 a mid-vertebral
stripe. The dry season and early wet Stason are passed
in eracks and crevices in the soil, When the plains
are flooded, it emerges and can be seen in shallower,
vegetated parts of the flooded areas, or basking at the
perimeter af buffalo wallows.
Breeding activity. Little is known of its breeding
habits. Males have been observed calling from a float-
ing position in the water when tain was falling during
periods of rising floods on the floodplains |l. Marris
pers, camm.].
ges, The nature of the spawn is unknown. Ova
dissected from gravid females are pigmented and haye
a mean diameter of 1,2 mm (range 1.1-1,3 mm).
Developmental history: The iadpoles have a bulbous
but elongate body. The eyes are dorso-lateral, the anus
median and the spiracle sinistral. The dorsal pattern
comprises dense mottling ona dark background, until
the longitudinal orientation of the stripe pattern of
the adult is detectable at stage 41. Ventral surface
dark, lightening to white by stage 42. Tail ryotomes
pigmented with a broad lateral stripe and another
along the dorsal edge (Fig. 6). Slight pigmentation of
the tail fin, The tooth row formula is 2/3. There is 4
well-developed, elevated border of small papillae
around the aral disc, widely separated superiorly by
a broad median gap (Fig, 7), The horny beak is well-
developed. The tadpoles reach 35 mm by stage 26.
and 52.6 mm (44.4-56.7) at stage 38. At stage 43 the
metamorphosing juveniles measured
28.2 mm (23.2-32.5 mm),
Litoria inermis (Peters)
A pale grey to brawn, medium sized (up ia 40 mm
S-V) ground-dwelling frog with slightly expanded ter-
minal digital discs. One of three closely related ‘ground
hylid’ species found in the area. Distinguished by its
warty dorsum, poorly developed head stripe. relative
limb lengih and reproductive strategy,
Breeding activity; Males. call from open areas (usu-
ally steeply sloping banks) fram Novetnber to March
The largest choruses occur early in ihe wet season-
Breeding occurs at 23.5-28.0°C, 92-96% RH. Depo.
silion sites are temporary pools with little or no emer-
gent vegetation. surrounded by gravel or sandy soils
and vegetation caver within Im of the water. Breeding
occurs al a water temperature of 33-35°C in water of
5-60 cm depth.
Eggs: Spawn is laid in free-floating surface clumps
of 96-330 eggs. Capsule diameter is large: 6.1 mm
(5.8-6.8 mm), Ovum 1.3 mm (1.3-1.4 mm), brown
with a white vegetal pole. There are three jelly envel-
opes,
Pevelopmental history; Tadpoles are of the vypical
lentic Literia form, with an elongate, oval-shaped
body (Fig. 6). Anus dextral, spiracle sinistral. Tadpoles
mottled brown on dorsum; abdomen dark, becoming
lighter during development. Tail myotomes mottled:
tail fin edges become yery dark in late developmental
stages. The tooth row formula is 2/3 and a well-
developed, elevated border of small papillae surround
REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (18): 415-440
April, 1983
roe]
SS ee
* nes ia
FIG. 6. Left lateral view of tadpole of (a) Litorta nasuta, (b) L.
bicolor, (c) L. tornieri, (d) L. dahlii, (e) L. inermis, (f) L.
caerulea, (g) L. sp. nr latopalmata, (h) L. wotjulumensis,
(i) L. rothii, (j) L. coplandt, (k) L. rubella. Scale bar = 5 mm.
the oral disc. There is a well-developed horny beak;
the papillary border is separated superiorly by a
median gap. A small patch of brown pigment is present
on the tip of the tail at stage 25, but this disappears
by stage 26. Maximum growth is from stages 25-27,
with the total length increasing from a mean of 6.3
mm (6.0-6.6 mm) at stage 24, to 21.2 (16.7-23.3 mm)
at stage 27. There is then a gradual increase to the
maximum mean length of 40.3 mm (38.3-43.5 mm)
(see Fig. 8). At 30°C juveniles metamorphosed after
74 days.
Litoria sp, near latopalmata
A slender pale grey to brown species; often mottled
with brown on the dorsum. Maximum length 37 mm
S-V. Distinguished from other ground-dwelling hylids
by its well-defined head stripe and smooth dorsum.
Breeding activity; Males call in large choruses from
open areas within | m of water from October to April.
Breeding has been observed from November to March,
at 24-28°C, R.H. 89-96%. At deposition sites the
water temperature was 33.6-41.2°C, and water depth
up to 100 cm.
Eggs: Spawn is deposited in temporary pools; eggs
are brown with a white vegetal pole and are laid as
a surface layer, becoming clumped when even slightly
disturbed. 50-350 eggs are laid with a mean capsule
diameter of 3.6 mm(3.4-3.9 mm), and ovum diameter
of 1.3 mm (1.2-1.3 mm). The ovum has three jelly
envelopes.
REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF THE FROGS OF THE MAGELA CREEK SYSTEM
Developmenral history Tadpoles hatch at stage L8.
They are mottled brown on the dorsum and have a
dark abdomen which lightens to white by stage 41.
The mottled pattern overlies the dark flanks, The tail
myotomes ar¢ heavily pigmented and mottled, and
the tail fin pigmented. The tadpole is of the typical
Litoria form with a dextral anus and sinistral spiracle
(Fig. 4). The tooth row formula is 2/3 and an elevated
and well-developed papillary border surrounds the
oral disc, The small papillae are separated superiorly.
Maximum growth ovcurs at stages 25-27. the total
length increasing trom 6.2 mm (6.0-6.3 mm) at stage
24 10 24.4 mm (20,]-28.5 mm) at stage 27. Maximum
length 1s reached at stage 38 with a mean total length
of 44.8 mm (42,1-48.9 mm) (see Fig. 8). This length
is Maintained until absarpiion of the tail begins at
stage 42, Two metamorphosing juveniles at stage 44
measured 14.8 and 16.1 mm respectively. AL 30°C
juveniles metamorphosed afier 87 days. In the field
juveniles were collected on 28 February 1980 in an
area where suitable pools had been available only
from January 5: a maximum of 54 days for devel-
opment.
Litoria meiriana (Tyler)
A small brown or mottled slate-coloured frog reach-
ing a maximum snout to vent length of 25 mm. It is
diurnal and occurs In leatHitter alongside sireams in
the sandstone escarpment. The dry season [s spent in
crevices and caves in the sandstone.
Breeding activity: Early in the wet season males call
trom Jeaflitter and open rock faces at the edge of
streams and pools in the escarpment. Breeding occurs
from October to December. Amplectant pairs have
been found at 26,5-27,0°C, R.H. 85.0-88.5%.
Eggs: Spawn is deposited beneath the water suface
ina film of small clumps attached to rocks or to the
floor of small, lemporary pools in sandy escarpment
Streambeds, Eggs are small and light brown. One
clutch contained 39 eggs.
Developmental history: Tadpoles are brown and have
4 dextral anus and sinistral spiracle. Tail myotomes
are mottled brown and havea dark brawn stripe along
the dorsal edge (Fig. 9). The upper tail fin is pigmented
The ventral surface lightens during development unt]
it is white at stage 42, Tadpoles have the typical
Literia tooth row formula and a well-developed, ele-
yated border of small papillae surrounding the oral
disc. The papillary border is narrawly separated supe-
norly (Fig. 9), There is a well-developed horny beak.
Maximum growth occurs at stages 25-27 increasing
from a mean of 4.05 (3.9-4.2 mm) ai stage 22 to 6.2
mm (3.7-12.6 mm) al stage 25, and up to 21.3 mm
(15.9-25.1 mm) at stage 27, The growth is then very
slight, increasing to only a mean of 25-4 mrn (25.3-
256 mm) at stage 41 (Fig. 10). At 30°C tadpoles
$27
reached stage 42 in 45 days. At Ngarradj warde djob-
keng (Birndu) juveniles were found in large numbers
on 30 November 1978, The first appreciable rains in
the area and observations of calling and spawning
were in the first days of November [G. Miles
pers, comm. ]: a maximum ol! 30 days for developmen,
Litoria microbelos (Cogger)
A small, slender, brown species attaining a maxi-
mum S-V length of 14 mm. It occurs among long
grass at the edges of pools and streams. The day is
spent under logs, stones and vegetation near
streambeds or flooded grassland.
Breeding activity: Males call from the base of grass
tussacks or en grass stems during or immediately
fallowing rain, from October to February. Early in
the wet season this species and 1. bicolor form large
breeding choruses in pools al the edge of billabangs,
Where L. bicolor is present, L. microbelos males call
trom the base of the grass tussocks; however, if Z.
hicalor is absent, £. microbelos calls from the grass
stems normally occupied by L. hicelor.
Eggs: Eggs are deposited in small clumps among
grass stems. Mean ovum diameter is 0.8 mim
(0,8-0.9 mm); the animal pole is brown and the vegetal
cream. No complete jelly capsules were found,
Developmental history: (Derived from specimens
iaken at Mitchell Plateau, W.A.) Embryos hatch at
stage 20 at a total length of 3.0 mm (2.8-3.1 mm). At
stage 24 total length is 4.1 mm (4.0-4.2 mm) increasing
to 11.4 mm (10.8-12.0 mm) at stage 27. No data are
available for later stages, There is dark pigmentation
on the dorsal surface, and a dark head and lateral
stripe. There are bands of pigment on the tail muscle.
The tail is lightly pigmented. The tooth row formula
is 2/3. A border of relatively large papillae surround
the aral disc. This is widely separated superiorly. The
horny beak 1s rather weakly developed.
Litoria nasuta Tschudi
An exceptionally long-legged, elongate-bodied spe-
cies attaining a maximum S-V length of 50 mm, It is
brown with dark brown and white longitudinally
orientated back markings, and a conspicuous dark
head stripe. It is abundant, eacept upon the escarp-
ment
Breeding activity: Males call from open areas
between grass tussocks within | m of water from
Navermnber to March, Breeding occurs from November
ta February. Amplectant pairs have been found at
25.0-26.5°C, R.H. 96%, At spawn deposition sites
water temperatures were 30.5-41.2°C, and water
depths of 15-30 cm.
428
Eggs; Spawn is deposited in small, temporary pools
on inundated grassland, usually where there 1s sparse
emergent vegetation. Eggs are dark brawn with cream
vegetal hemispheres, Spawn is laid as a surface film
which becomes a clump when disturbed. There are
50-100 eggs/clump, with a mean capsule diameter of
3.4 mm (3.2-3.7 mm) and ovum diameter of 1,1 mm
(1,0-1.3 mm), There are three jelly envelopes.
Developmental history: The tadpole is of typical
lentic Litoria form. The anus is dextral and spiracle
sinistral. The tooth row formula is 2/3 with a well-
developed, elevated papillary border surrounding the
oral disc and separated superiorly (Fig, 7), Tadpoles
are motiled brown with the Ventral surface whitening
during development. The tail myotomes are mottled,
and the tail fin pigmented (Fig. 6). The characteristic,
striped, back patiern of the adults becomes evident
at stage 42. The extreme leg length, striped leg pattern
and reduced toe-webbing distinguish this specics at
silage 41 from closely-related species. Eggs hatch at
stage 18 at a mean length of 1.9 mm (1.8-1.9 mm).
They attain 6.0 mm (5.2-6.3 mm) by stage 24, where-
upon there is maximum growth until stage 28,
33.3 mm (29.0-38.3 mm) (Fig. 12). The maximum
mean length of 48.8 mm (44.8-55.7 mm) 1s reached
al slage 39, Tadpoles remain at this size until absorp-
tion of the tail commences at stage 43. Ar 30°C
juveniles metamorphose afler 31 days at a mean length
of 18.7 mm (17.3-21.6 mm),
Litoria personata Tyler, Davies & Martin
A small, rock-dwelling species, attaining a maximum
S-V length of 35 mm. It is brown or grey with a
conspicuous dark head stripe. The dry season is spent
in cracks and crevices in the escarpment.
Breeding activity: Males call from open rock faces
and elevated positions at the edge of streams in the
escarpment from November to late January, Tadpoles
and transforming juveniles were collected in late April
1978 by M. J. Tyler.
Egas: The eggs are unknown.
Developmental history; Tadpoles have been found
in temporary pools upon the escarpment and in stream
beds at its base. The tadpoles are highly distinctive,
being dark brown dorsally with gold to yellow dorso-
lateral stripes. The ventral surface is creamy white.
There is a dark prey band between the eyes, and an
arrowhead-shaped dark prey paich anteriorly. The
body shape is typical of other Lyroria fram louie hab-
i1ats, The body is flattened, the tail muscle is well
developed and the fins narrow. The tooth row formula
is 2/3, with a complete, elevated papillary border
surrounding the oral disc. The horny beak is weakly
developed. Anus dextral. and the spiracle sinistral.
Tadpoles measured 41_8-55.1 mm at stages 41-45
REC. S. AUST. MUS., [8 (18). 415-440
dprit, MSZ
(Tyler et at,, 1979). They form aggregations and are
often seen miainiaining a static. horizontal position
§-10 em beneath the surface.
Litoria rothii (de Vis)
A large tree frog attaming 60 mm snout to vent
Jength. It is brown and has bright yellow and black
markings in the groin and upon ihe posterior surface
of the thigh, 11 is commonly seen on buildings in the
area.
Breeding activily: Males call between November
and March following rain from elevated positions
neat water, Breeding occurs from November to March
at 27.5-28.5°C, R.A. approximately 96%.
Eggs: Spawn is deposited in small clumps in tem-
porary pools in which emergent vegetation may be
present or absent. Eggs are dark brown with a cream
vegetal pole and have a mean diameter of 1.4 mm
(1.3-1.4 mm). The capsule is 4,6-5.4 mm. It ts fragile
and easily ruptured. There are three jelly envelopes.
Developmental history: Tadpoles are pale yellow on
ihe dorsal surface and white yentrally when they
hatch at stage 18. There are dark brown stripes, one
branches forward antenur to the eyes and another on
each side of the body fram the nostri! to ihe end of
the tail. A bright yellow spot is visible on the dorsal
surface just anterior 10 the eyes. At stage 23 external
gill filaments are present. Anus dextral, spiracle sin-
istral. The body is of the typical “irorja leniie waier
form, but the tail fins are much deeper than in other
species in the area (Fig, 6), The stripes fade during
development and the dorsal and lateral surfaces
become mottled brown. The dorsal surface of the
head becomes very flat. The tooth row formula is
2/3. The third lower row of labial teeth is absent or
reduced io a small, median structure bearing less than
ten teeth. A border of well-developed large papulae
is elevated and sourrounds the oral disc except supe-
riorly (Fig. 7). There is a well-developed horny beak,
The tadpoles undergo a maximum growth period in
stage 25 inereasing in total length from 7.0 mm (6.8-
74mm) at stage 24 to 19.9 mm (7.2-38.2mm) at
stage 25 increasing to 31.4. mim (25.3-43.0 mm) in
stage 26. A maximum of 58,2 mm was measured in
a stage 40 iadpole (Fig. 8). Ai 30°C a juvenile meta-
morphosed after 146 days: in the field, huwever, a
large juvenile was collected on 11 March 1980 in an
area where water was not present until after 5 January
1980; a maximum of 65 days for development.
Litwria rubella (Gray)
A small brown tree frog of up 10 40 mm S-V, it is
abundant throughout the area except in the escarp-
meni. The day ts spent in hollows, under logs and
rocks. in dry streambeds and on banks. in dwellings
and cisterns.
REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF THE FROGS OF THE MAGELA CREEK SYSTEM 424
Te ite,
WHnt¥e on WELW), sal yz yy ae ;
i
ELAN
swine
an
is f
NS
eit r
| wate ied
ni Pa ( ie
4 RAWeoe
vad ipa rel
syit
wl!
ju telltaniaeay
Mn
iy, Ne ss
gt
ii Hey
belle juan
FP
FIG, 7. Oral discs of fa) Literia dahlii, (b) L. caerulea, (c) L.
rothi, (d) L. wotjulumensis, (e) L. bicelar, () L. nasuta, (g) L.
caplandi. (h) L. rubella, Seale bar = | mm.
(mm)
LENGTH
TADPOLE
430
REC. S. AUST. MUS.,
18 (18): 415-440 April, 1983
Litoria bicolor Total Length Litorta rubella Total Length
40+ 4
304 } | | 4 | t | if
204 Ta J |
i tyf
104 4
AIR TEMP. 30° - 32°C AIR TEMP 30° - 32°C
WATER TEMP 25°- 30°C = ft WATER TEMP 25° - 30°C
z * ae
x
10) T T T T T T T + T “¥ T
éo Litoria caerulea Total Length | iF t } Litoria inermis Total Length f i
304 it 1 | } } i
204 |
15 Lt AIR TEMP 30°- 32°C 7 AIR TEMP 30° - 32°C
z WATER TEMP 25° - 30°C zit WATER TEMP 25° - 30°C
zy = zt =F
10) + T r T << T T T T T T
607 4
Litoria rothi Total Length I] - Litoria sp.nr. /atopalmata Total Length
50+ - 4 |
40 J t
1 ts
t
= =
30- 4 |
20-4 4
I
I
ol AIR TEMP 30° - 32°C | AIR TEMP 30° - 32°C
= } t WATER TEMP 25° - 30°C eet = = WATER TEMP 25° - 30°C
fe} L 1) T T T T T T T T T T T
20 25 30 35 40 45 20 25 30 35 40 45
TADPOLE STAGE
FIG. 8. Growth gradients in tadpoles of various species of Litoria.
Breeding activity: Males call from a variety of areas
near water ranging from open grassy areas to elevated
sandy hillocks, usually on the ground. Silent males
and amplectant pairs are often found within 0.3 m of
a calling male. Calling and breeding occur from
November to April, although both activities appear
concentrated early and late in this period. Amplexus
occurs at 25.0-26.5°C, R.H. 92-96%.
REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF THE FROGS OF THE MAGELA CREEK SYSTEM
Eggs: Spawn is deposited in the form of small,
floating surface films in temporary pools with or with-
out emergent vegetation. Water temperatures of up
ta 40°C have been recorded at the deposition site,
water depth is 30-LO0 cm. Eggs have a brown animal
pole and cream vegetal pole. There are 40-300 eggs
in a clump. The capsule diameter ts 2.1 mm
(1.9-2.3 mm), and ovum diameter 1.0 mm
(1,.0-L.1 mm). There are three jelly envelopes.
Developmental history: At 30°C the eggs hatch
within three days at stage 21, Tadpoles attain maxi-
mum growth duririg stages 25-27, increasing in total
length from 5.9 mm (4.5-6.9 mm) al stage 23 to
22.2 mm (17-9-30,9 mm) at stage 27. Maximum length
js reached at stage 42 (Fig, 8), 31.2 mm
(25.3-34.8 mm), Tadpoles have a 2/3 tooth formula,
and small papillae in a well-developed, clevated border
surraund the oral dise except superiorly (Fig. 7), The
horny beak is well developed, The spiracle is left
ventro-lateral and the anus right median. The body
is rotund, mottled brown on the dorsum, and white
on the ventral surface (Fig. 6). The mottling becomes
darker during development. There is dark pigmenta-
tion on the tail muscle in three stripes: a laleral ane
flanked by others along the dorsal and ventral extrem-
ilies, This pigmentation also occurs on the outer edge
of the tail tin becoming increasingly darker during
development, A shallow nasal groove from eye to
nase 1s present in later Stages. At stage 4], a broad,
white, lateral stripe and a vertebral stripe appears and
is retained until after metamorphosis. There is also a
white patch anteriorly to and below the eye. The
remainder of the dorsum is uniform brown. At 30°C
the juveniles metamorphose afler 38 days. A collection
of tadpoles with metamorphosing juveniles present
was made on 10 February 1980 from a pool that
could noi have been filled before 5 January 1980: a
maximum of 37 days for complete development.
Litoria tornieri (Nieden)
A moderate-sized, ground-dwelling hylid (40 mm)
distinguished by a narraw continuous brown. stripe
on the anterior margin of the tibia. In the breeding
season the species ts reddish with a conspicuous, dark
brown head stripe.
Breeding activity: Males call from cover, either under
leaves or at ihe base of grass tussocks within 3 m of
water. Calling occurs from October to April; breeding
has been observed from November until March.
Breeding occurs at 25.0-26,5°C, R.H,
92-96%,
Eges: Eggs are laid in temporary pools in inundated
grassland where the water depth is Jess than 100 cm,
The dark brown eggs have a white vegetal pole and
are laid as a surface layer which becomes a clump
441
SC ae a
re oot
D AN ew.
r Se oe / a
: Fe \ alt
ae ee te ; =
ada eS 7 a a Oe ie _
SES ‘ at
rn ee)
oe ee
FIG. 9. (a) Left lateral view of tadpole, and /) oral dise af
Literia meiriana, Scale bar = 1 mm.
when disturbed. Capsule diameter is 3.4 mm
(3.2-3.7 mm) and ovum diameter 1.4 mm. There are
iwo jelly envelopes,
Develapmental history: Tadpoles ace mottled brown
on the dorsum and have a dark abdomen which
lightens to white during development. The tail
myotomes are mottled, and the tail fin pigmented,
The tadpole is of typical lentic Litoria form (Fig. 6).
The anus opens right of median and the spiracle left
lateral, The tooth row formula is 2/3, and a well-
developed, elevated border of small papillae incom-
pletely surrounds the oral disc. The horny beak is
strongly developed. Tadpoles hatch at stage 18 and
reach a mean total length of 6.5 mm (6.1-7.1 mm) at
stage 24 (Fig. 12). A period of accelerated growth
occurs, increasing the total length to 26.4. mm (23,2-
29,9 mm) at stage 27, Growth increases slowly until
it reaches a maximum of 38.8 mm (34,6-44,0 mm)
at stage 38. One juvenile was 15.1 mm at metamor-
phosis. At 30°C tadpoles reached stage 40 in 44 days.
Litoria wotjulumensis (Copland)
A large ground-dwelling hylid (reaching 70 mm
5-V), with an elongate body, extensive webbing of the
toes and a broad dark conspicuous head stripe, Its
call has a repertoire of rattles and chuckles.
Breeding activity: Males call trom open areas at the
edge of water and face the water. Calling occurs from
October to March, and the species breeds in the carly
months of the wel season. Breeding has been observe:l
at 25-27°C, R.H.. 75-92%,
LENGTH (mm)
TADPOLE
432
REC. §. AUST, MUS,, 18 (18): 415-440
tprl, 1983
40
Nofaden mel/anoscaphus Toia| Length if Litaria meiriana ~~ Total Length
30 I } _ = i
i T fE-*F_
F eet
20 |
a | AIR TEMP 30° - 32°C | AIR TEMP 30° - 32°C
[= zt WATER TEMP 25° - 30°C WATER TEMP 25° - 30°C
t z=
= =
= | ——
(9) SS ee Tr a T 1 T es La —_——_— — we
20 25 30 35 40
TADPOLE STAGE
30 Uperojeia jnundata Total Length {-
/ | if]
10 AIR TEMP 30° - 32°C
WATER TEMP 25° - 30°C
25
30 35
TADPOLE STAGE
40
45
FIG. 10. Growth gradients in tadpoles of various species of frogs.
Eggs: Spawn is laid in temporary pools in sandy or
gravelly soil. Eggs were found at water temperatures
of 32-33°C in water 10-50 mm deep. The dark brown
eggs have a cream vegetal pole and deposited as a
floating clump of 30-200 eggs, occasionally attached
to surface vegetation. Mean capsule diameter 4.6 mm
(4,2-4.9 mm), ovum diameter 1.75 (1.6-1.9 mm), There
are three jelly envelopes.
Developmental history: Tadpoles have well-devel-
oped external gills at stages 20-24, The body is typical
of lentic Litoria (Fig. 6). The tadpole is mottled dark
brown and the ventral surface is white. Anus dextral,
spiracle sinistral. The tail myotomes are heavily mot-
tled, and the upper tail fin pigmented. The tooth row
formula is 2/3 and a well-developed, elevated border
of small papillae incompletely surrounds the oral disc
(Fig. 7). The horny beak is strongly developed. At
stage 25 the total length is 12.6 mm (8.2-21.2 mm)
increasing to 40.5 mm (39.3-42.3 mm) at stage 41
(Fig. 12). Juveniles metamorphosed at a mean length
of 17.0 mm (15.5-18.0 mm). At 30°C tadpoles reached
stage 42 after 53 days.
Limnodynastes convexiusculus (Macleay)
A large, broad-bodied frog with a mottled tubercular
dorsum, common in swampy areas and abundant on
the floodplains. It is found among long grass usually
in small hollows or burrows, It is cryptic in its habits.
Breeding activity: Males call from October until
April from small hollows among long grass near water.
Eggs: There is little known of the eggs except that
they are laid in the form of a foam nest.
Developmental history: The tadpoles are a distinc-
tive, intense black with long, deep tail fins (Fig. 5).
Anus median, spiracle lateral and sinistral. The tooth
row formula is 5/3 and there is an elevated border of
large papillae which is widely separated superiorly
around the oral disc. The horny beak 1s rather weakly
developed. The body is robust and the dorsal surface
slightly flattened. Tadpoles do not occur in large num-
bers. They attain a maximum length of 70 mm.
Limnodynastes ornatus (Gray)
A rotund, fossorial frog up to 45 mm S-V with a
highly variable back pattern. This species has no pre-
ferred habitat (although it is uncommon in the larger
billabongs) and is abundant in the area.
Breeding activity: Males call whilst free-floating in
water. Calling occurs from October to March, and
breeding from November to February. Breeding has
been observed at air temperatures of approximately
26°C, R.H. 88.5-96.0%. Any pool deeper than 2 cm
is used for breeding purposes, including ditches newly
dug for sewer pipes and shallow, water-filled depres-
sions on the road surface. At deposition sites water
temperatures were 27-38°C.
=
45
REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF THE FROGS OF THE MAGELA CREEK SYSTEM
433
FIG. WI. Oral dises
(bh) Limnodynastes ornatus
har = Imm.
ges: Eges are deposited in a foam nest floating on
the surface of the water. The foam rapidly collapses
to form a thin surface film. The number of eggs per
clump is 155-1 630 with a mean of 645. Ovum black
with a white vegetal pole and diameter of 1.2 mm
(1.0-1.3 mm), The eggs have one jelly en velope; capsule
diarmeter 1.6 mm (1.45-1,8 mim).
Developmental history: The embryos hatch after 18
hours at stage 20 at a length of 4.4 mm (4,0-4.7 mm).
Long filamentous gills are present from slages 22-24,
Growth is steady throughout development, The tad-
poles are brown on the dorsal surface with a darker
patch between the eyes, and on the tail myotomes.
Eyes dorsal and close together giving the tadpole a
distinctive appearance, Anus median, spiracle sinistral.
Bady flattened dorso-ventrally (Fig. 5), Tooth rows
vary from 2/3 to 5/3. A well-developed, elevated
border of large papillae, separated superiorly, sur-
rounds the oral disc (Fig. 11). The horny beak js
weakly developed, The tadpoles form dense and acti ve
aggregations, and cannibalism 1s prevalent, particularly
in ephemeral pools. A maximum length of 31.0 mm
(29,5-32.8 mm) is reached at stage 39 (Fig. 12) and
juveniles metamorphosed at 10.3 mm (6.5-11.6 mm),
At 30°C metamorphosis was completed after 26 days.
In the field, spawn laid on 28 November 1977 devel-
oped to stage 46 on 23 December 1977: 25 days.
Megistolotis lignarius Tyler, Martin and Davies
A moderate-sized (60 mm S-V) robust species with
short, Very muscular limbs and a very large tym-
panum. Inhabits scree slopes and escarpmenis and
hides beneath rocks and boulders, and in caves during
the dry season.
Breeding activity; Males call from beneath boulders
in or near sireambeds in the escarpment, Breeding
commences jn late November,
Eggs: The creamy’ yellow eggs are deposited in a
foam nest under rocks in static water.
of (a) Notaden melanascaphus,
» (c) Cyeloranu longipes. Seale
Developmental history: Hatching occurs at stage 21,
The body and fins are intense black, Anus median,
spiracle sinistral. The tadpoles have highly efficient
suctorial mouthparts. The tooth row formula varies
from 4/3 to 6/3. A border of small papillae is well
developed, elevated and narrowly separated superiorly.
The horny beak is strongly developed, Cannibalism
has been noted in the laboratory. Tadpoles reach a
length of over 50 mm by Stage 42. A juvenile meta-
morphosed after 65 days and measured 23.3 mm
(Tyler, Martin & Davies, 1979),
Notaden melanoscaphus Hosrner
A methum-sized, extremely robust, fossorial trog
with short limbs, It is pale brown with large dark
blotches on its back, and when seized exudes a copious
amount of sticky, yellow secretion from large dorsal
glands. It is found in grasslands throughout the area
and passes the day buried in sandy soil.
Breeding activity: Males call during or immediately
afier rain trom shallow, water-filled depressions. Call-
ing occurs from December to March. and breeding
from early January to March. Air temperatures range
23.0-26,5°C, R.H, 96-100%.
Eggs: The spawn is deposited as a surface film in
shallow, ephemeral pools in inundated grassland.
Water temperatures range 27-36°C and the depth
1-30 cm. Eggs have a black animal pole and white
vegetal pole. The number of eggs is 500-1 000 with a
mean of 833. The eggs have individual capsules jained
by a sticky loose layer of jelly. The mean capsule
diameter is 2.7 mm (2.6-2.9 mm) and avum diameter
1.4 mm (1.3-1,45 mm). There is one Jelly envelope.
Developmental history: The spawn sinks as the eggs
develop, The larvae hatch at stage 20 at 5.8 mm (5.0-
6.8 mm). External gills are present at stages 22-24.
Anus dextral, spiracle sinistral and lateral (visible
from a dorsal view). Dorsal pigmentation dark brown,
with the adwt back pattern becoming apparent in
stage 41. Ventral surface dark brown becoming lighter
as development proceeds. Tail myotomes dark brown
434
(mm)
LENGTH
TADPOLE
REC. S. AUST. MUS., 18 (18): 415-440 April, 1983
705 ]
Litoria tornier’ Total Length Cyclorana australis Total Length
604 |
da! 4 | t
‘i
40 | J | |? 4 a
305 ] } if i “I
204 |
a
10") AIR TEMP 30° - 32°C 7 AIR TEMP 30° - 32°C
‘ zt WATER TEMP 25° - 30°C WATER TEMP 25° - 30°C
5
t ‘ a
*
ol ad 2 — —T— —T- — ~~ eee, ao ——T —= — —T
607 5
Litoria nasuta Total Length Cyclorana fongipes Total Length
80
MS
40-5 4
£
£
304 | ft
20+ 1 1 HH
104 AIR TEMP 30° - 32°C | AIR TEMP 30° - 32°C
WATER TEMP 25° - 30°C f WATER TEMP 25° - 30°C
zit rt xt
ft ft zt
EO
ot — + — T i — a: —— —- a a ——
505 4
Litoria wotjulumensis Total Length Limnodynastes ornatus Total Length
40 T } 4
30+ | it a t i
20 4 i i ea
| | tt |
104 4 I
AIR TEMP 30° - 32°C } AIR TEMP 30° - 32°C
i = WATER TEMP 25° - 30°C +] zt t WATER TEMP 25° - 30°C
L =
[0] —T =" 4d 3 —T— —— —T —T ee | as | —~T —“
20 25 30 35 40 45 20 25 30 35 40 45
TADPOLE STAGE
FIG. 12. Growth gradients in tadpoles of various species of frogs.
REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF THE FROGS OF THE MAGELA CREEK SYSTEM
and tail fins pigmented. Upper tail fin much deeper
than lower (Fig. 5). Tooth row formula is 2/3 with
one complete upper and two complete lower rows.
The third lower tooth row is reduced to a median
structure of 10 teeth (Fig. 11). A border of large
papillae is not well developed and is widely separated
superiorly. The horny beak is very weakly developed.
The tadpoles increase in total length from 7.25 mm
(6.1-8.1 mm) at stage 24, to 17.2 mm (13.7-19.2 mm).
At stage 24 a tadpole measured 25.4 mm (Fig. 10).
The tadpoles inhabit very shallow water (1-5 cm) deep
in inundated grassland. Water temperatures exceeding
41°C have been recorded there. There is heavy floc-
culent material on the floor, and the tadpoles spend
most of the time lying in this layer. In the field a
juvenile was found on 26 February 1979 in an area
where adult Notaden were not present before 4 J anuary
1979: a maximum of 53 days for complete develop-
ment.
Ranidella bilingua Martin, Tyler and Davies
A small, brown species with variable darker and
lighter markings on its back, and measuring a maxi-
mum of 25 mm. It inhabits inundated grasslands in
the wet season; the dry season is spent on the soil
under logs and rocks.
Breeding activity: An opportunistic breeder; males
call and mating occurs whenever sufficient rain falls,
even in dry season showers. Males call from the base
of grass tussocks in or around water.
Eggs: Eggs are laid in small clumps attached to
vegetation. The animal pole is dark brown and the
vegetal pole creamy white. There is a single jelly
envelope. The capsule diameter is 1.74 (+ 0.16 mm)
and ovum diamter 1.17 (+ 0.04 mm) (Martin, Tyler
& Davies, 1980).
Developmental history: Derived from Martin ef al.
(1980). Eggs hatch at stage 20 and have a total length
4.0-4.5 mm. There are no external gills present. At
Stage 25 the total length is about 6.5 mm, increasing
to 24.5 mm by stages 40-41. The tadpoles are dark
brown with the myotomes and ventral surface white.
Upper and lower fins are pigmented. The tooth row
formula is 2/3 with the third lower row very short.
Few large papillae border the lateral area of the mouth,
but are completely absent superiorly. Posteriorly there
are just two papillae flanking the third short tooth
row. The horny beak is strongly developed. Juveniles
collected at Mitchell Plateau, W.A. metamorphosed
at 7.5-8.4 mm S-V after 13-14 days.
Uperoleia arenicola Tyler, Davies and Martin
A small, squat species only found in a sandy
streambed in the escarpment of Birndu (Ngarradj
warde djobkeng) near Ja-Ja. Its colour is variable (pale
435
grey to dark slate) and there are bronze parotoid
glands. The specimens were found on steep-sided
sandy banks of the stream.
Breeding activity: Data are confined to observations
on calling males. We noted that they called without
moving from their burrows and were still covered
with fine sand.
Uperoleia inundata Tyler, Davies and Martin
A moderate-sized species of up to 30 mm S-V
length. It is grey with highly variable dark brown to
ted dorsal markings. In the wet season it inhabits
inundated grasslands.
Breeding activity: From January to April the males
call from shallow water at the base of grass tussocks,
under leaves and logs, and from grass stems in water.
Large breeding choruses are formed. Breeding occurs
during January and February, at 24.5-29.0°C, R.H.
89-100%.
Eggs: Spawn is deposited in shallow (2-5 cm), inun-
dated grasslands, water temperatures 27,2-28.6°C. Eggs
are laid in small clumps (<5) or individually, and
immediately sink to the bottom. They have a sticky,
tough outer capsule which accumulates a covering of
particles. The ovum has a dark brown animal pole
with a light brown vegetal pole. There is one jelly
envelope, and the capsule has a diameter of 1.8 mm
(1.5-2.0 mm). The ovum diameter is 1.25 mm (1.1-
1.4 mm).
fo figura x
ule STO
uot
gol " Qe Ay,
Fao lg
FIG. 13. (a) Left lateral view of tadpole, and (b) oral disc of
Uperoleia inundata. Scale bar = 1 mm.
Developmental history: Embryos hatch at stage 20
at a total length of 2.7 mm (2.5-2.8 mm). External
gills are absent. At stage 25 the total length is
10.4 mm (6.6-17.1 mm). Tadpoles are dark brown on
the dorsal and lateral surfaces, and mottled with red-
purple and white on the ventral surfaces. Anus dextral,
spiracle sinistral and visible from above. The tail
myotomes are mottled with brown and the upper tail
fin is pigmented (Fig. 13). The tooth row formula is
2/3 with the upper row divided. A poorly-developed
436
border of large papillae, widely separated superiorly
and inferiorly. surrounds the oral disc (Fig. 13). The
horny beak is weakly developed. Tadpoles grow to 4
length of 31.0 mn (23.25-33.9 mm), At stage 44 the
tadpoles had a size range of 16,0-17.7 mm (Fig, 10).
Juveniles were collected on 2 March 1979 in an area
where there was not water prior to 10 January 1979:
a maximum of 41 days for metamorphosis.
Sphenophryne robusta (Fry)
A very small, brown cryptic. terrestrial species found
in “*paperbark swamps’, rainforest remnants and in
ihe escarpment. It inhabiis leaf bitter.
Breeding activity: Little is known of us biology.
Other sphenophrynine microhylids lay eggs out of
water and exhibit direct development within the egg
capsules, It may be assumed that this species behaves
similarly.
BEHAVIOUR
Activity Patierns
Adults of most species are active only at night but
there are a few exceptions. We have observed spas-
modic diurnal calling activity by Liroria rothiv and
L. rubella, whilst in the wet season Cyclorana australis
and L. dahlii commonly bask in the sun a1 the edge
of pools. On the morning of 29 November 1977 M.D,
and M.J.T. captured two basking C. australis at
Ja Ja. The air temperature there was 33°C, Dorsal
skin temperatures were 33.0°C and 34.4°C respec-
tively, cloacal temperatures 33.4°C and 34,2°C and
ground beneath the frogs 32.0°C and 34.0°C. Our
experience with C. australis at the study site and
elsewhere in the Northern Territory indicate that the
basking frogs are not alert; they press their bodies
close to the ground and if approached quietly they
can be captured by hand, We are uncertain of the
upper limit of temperature at which basking is. dis-
continued. Beyond the study area at a site adjacent
to the Stuart Highway 99 km south of Elliot on
17.12.80, two of us (Davies, Tyler) with A. A. Martin
collected specimens beside a temporary pool where
the air temperature was 37.0°C; soil beneath one frog
was 36,2°C and the adjacent water temperature
30.0°C. The body temperature was 36.4°C. During
experiments at Adelaide designed to induce burrowing,
C ausiralis temained on the surface tor two hours
when exposed to a heat lamp elevating the surface
temperature of the adjacent soil to 40°C (J. Sanders,
pers, comm.).
Litoria dahlii is less readily approached whilst bask-
ing than is C. australis, and we have fot captured
basking specimens.
REC. S, AUST. MUS,, 18 (18); 415-440
ipril, HAs
Litovia meiriana is habitually diurnal. This small
species shelters in the shade at the perimeter of rock
pools and is unique amongst Australian anurans in
having the ability to travel across the surface of static
water in a series of rapid bounces to avoid enemies
or Lo capture small. flying insects.
Seasonality of Reproductive Behaviour
From May to September any rainfall in the Magela
Creek system isa rare event (see Jabiru rainfall records
plotted by Tyler and Crook 1980). The area is hot
and dry and activity by frogs 1s minimal,
The nature of dry season refuges influences the
onset of reproductive activity only slightly. The low-
land species in general require the formation of shallow
bodies of water, and 11 is evident that the fossorial
species ate amongst the first to breed there (Fig. 14).
We have observed the effect of rainfall upon the
escarpment and upon the floodplain and, despite the
absence of comparative rainfall records, 11 1s evident
that even slight falls upon the escarpment are sufficient
1o induce breeding. This is because the impermeable
surfaces result in rainfall flowing across the rock and
accumulating in every depression, so providing
numerous breeding sites. These breeding sites may be
produced by localised showers in the wel season, and
our observations in the Northern Territory and the
Kimberley Division of Western Australia indicate that
some species breed during these unseasonal light or
localised rains. Irrespective of how localised these
rains tay be. they are of greatest significance upon
the escarpment, benefitting species such as Liforta
personata, L. coplandi and Megistalotis lignarius.
Fecundily
Clutch size is commonly at variance with the total
egg complement because some individuals deposit
several clutches on a single mght. This habit probably
explains the wide disparity in clutch sizes recorded
in Table 2. Other species such as Litaria coplandi
and Ranidella bilingua scatter single eggs and the
complement cannot be calculated from field obser-
vations.
Salthe and Duellman (1973) demonstrate that within
any reproductive mode there is a positive correlation
between egg complement and adult size. Thus large
species tend to lay more eggs than small ones. This
is bore out by our data (Table 2) and there is very
slight interspecific variation in egg diameters. Thus
the maximum ovidiameter of ©. ausiralts 1s
1.8mm and in L. microbelos 0.9 mm (100% variation).
This is despite the fact thal there is a 500% difference
in body length (100 mm S-V in ©. australts against
20 mm in L, wticrohelos.
a, ACTIVE
WA CALLING ACTIVITY
ria BREEDING
FIG. 14. Wet season activity of frogs in the Magela Creek System.
For each species, the upper trace represents data derived
from 1978-79 season, and the lower trace 1979-80 season.
Capsule diameter is the sum of the ovidiameter
surrounded by the expanded (hydrated) oviducal
secretions deposited upon the ova. In the species
examined the outer capsule diameter was approxi-
mately 1.5-2.5 times the ovidiameter (Table 2). Figures
for L. inermis, L. rothii and L. wotjulumensis are
exceptional, the maximum capsule diameter of L.
inermis being 6.8 mm and maximum ovidiameter
1.4 mm (Table 2).
Reproductive Modes
In the 24 species there are only three distinct repro-
ductive modes, one of which is represented by only
one species (Table 3), and in fact 20 species share the
generalised anuran pattern of laying eggs in water and
having aquatic larvae. In general the Australian hylids
are remarkably conservative in reproductive modes,
and presumably the high proportion of hylids in the
study fauna contributed to the limited overall diver-
sity. Elsewhere in sub-tropical faunas, diverse repro-
ductive regimes have been recorded (Salthe &
Duellman, 1973; Crump, 1974). Certainly in temperate
southern Australia, diversity of reproductive modes
is associated with leptodactylid rather than hylid spe-
cies (Tyler, Watson & Martin, 1981, Table 2). Never-
theless the seasonal aridity and limited forestation of
the Magela Creek system environment probably are
inimical to many reproductive modes. For example,
there is very limited leaf litter or other low layers of
REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF THE FROGS OF THE MAGELA CREEK SYSTEM 437
OCT. | NOV. | DEC. | JAN. | FEB. | MAR. APR.
Litoria bicol COLL LILELIEE. LEE TTEEEEZEE
7 Yoria bicolor LLL tit ty LSS LLLILLLLLLLL LLL LE LE
on
° ELL
= L. caerulea LEE: tit LLM yyy yyy" LLL
@
o : USULLLLLLLLLLL LULL LLL ZZ
fe | 4. roth CLL, C5 WLLILULU LILIA U ttt
L. rubella LLL LA
. EE LLLALLLL ALLELE ELLE LEE EEEEEEEEEEELE, LLLLLEPLLE LLL LL
L. inermis a 7 LLL Sv ee
. LLL =
on
c
= OE§G LILLE WMI LULA Le Kiko
Sy L. sp. nr. /atopalmata LL—____ ZZIIIED
acl
vu =
1 > tapi [eZ yyyygglrPYmn"/""" dada,
ge L. tornieri LI LEE LZ A
a
°o
SMELL, LP 1
oO L. nasuta _— COLL LLL CLLLEELELEL EE EEEEEEEED
‘ ‘ ZZ LLL: tj La ULL LEE a)
L. wotjulumensis EE
. LLL, Yih srr iggy
L. microbelos we EEE HHH
? EZ SLL ]
Cyclorana australis i KLE ZZ
‘ zzz LLLLILLLLLLIL ITA LILLE,
C. longipes EE:
Limnodynastes MM MLL LL LELLLLLLTILL HL
convexiusculus VALLI, LLLLLLLLLLLLLA
BZ LLL
L. ornatus LZ LLLLA OLLI)
LLL YUL
Notaden melanoscaphus ‘— = LLL
‘ yj MTThibhooyy M_DAM-—A>AA/>DPU>-Jqpz-: Lp JILL DLE
Ranidella bilingua MEE J™
Uperoleia inundata c MM I fPY"»-ILLELLLL Li
Litoria dahlit l 7
L. copland ZA =)
2 ‘ ma
Oo
a. L. personata LLL LLL LLL LE LLL LLL LLL EEE
=| 4. meiriana sae om ama =
o
& Megisto/otis eB;
5 lignarius
wi | | I | | |
OCT. NOV. DEC. JAN. FEB. MAR. APR.
438
REC. 8. AUST. MUS., 18 (18): 415-440
April, 1983
TABLE 2: CHARACTERISTICS OF SPAWN
Clutch Clutch No, of Capsule wa:
number size jelly diam, a mre Cl
envelopes (mm) :
median range median range
ee RY
) trali oo asd ITanare z° | 7.000 2 2,5 (2.3-2.8) 1.65 (1.5-1.8)
ete Sonsings 2 { 000-1 615 2 2.2 (1.9-2.5) 1.35 (1,2-1.5)
Litoria bicolor. - 2 50-195 3 2.4 (1.9-2.9) 1,00
Litoria caerulea 4 103-328 2 2.5 (2.2-2.9) 1,25 (1.1.4)
Litoria inermis . 23 7 96-330 3 6.3 (5.8-6.8) 1,35 (1.3-L.4)
Litoria sp. nr- fatopalmata 10 52-921 3 3.6 (3,4-3.9) 1.25 (1.2-1,3)
Litoria metriana - ; ges 5 - - ° F & ; 0 ba by
itera ren he 2 50-100 3 3.4 (3.253.7) «15 (1.01.3)
Litoria rothit. -- ! 504 3 5.0 (4.6-5.4) 1.35 (1.3-1.4)
Litaria rubella . l 715 3 2.1 (1.9-2.3) 1.05 (1.Q-1.1)
Litoria torniert 2 69-190 2 3.4 (3,2-3.7) 1.4 .
Litoaria woljulumensis 4 31-50 3 4.5 (4.2-4.9) 1.75 (1.6-1.9)
Limnodynastes ornalus - 19 155-1 632 | 1.6 (1,45-1.8) 1.15 (1,0-1,3)
Megistolotis lignarius’ ! 352 - - Pry 1.85 (1,8-1.9)
Notaden melanoseaphus 4 561-1 028 | 22 (2.6-2,9) 14° (1.3-1,55)
Ranidella bilingua - - 1 3.1 (2.5-3.7) 1.12 (1.05-1.2)
Uperoleia inundata 1 400 l 1.8 (1.5-2.0) 1.25 (1.1-1.4)
> From Tyler et al (1979)
TABLE. 3; REPRODUCTIVE MODES
AMONGST THE SPECIES AND GENERA OF THE FROG FAUNA OF
THE MAGELA CREEK SYSTEM
5
g 2
g Ka =
= é, 3 PA 3 S =
g 3 3 iS & = 3 5
S = = a 3 3 S = =
= 5 E & = = & = a
= = to =
oC I 3 = 2 4 5 a -
(a) Eggs in water, aquatic larvae. , 2 14 - 1 i 2 20
(b) Eggs in foam nest on water, aquatic
larvae . pews} of , pu - ~ 2 . = :
(c) Eggs on Jand, larvae on land
-?
ceed
high humidity necessary to create the conditions under
which direct development, or the delayed emergence
from egg capsules is physically possible. Evidently
similar factors operate in South America where the
greatest diversity of reproductive modes is associated
with environmental conditions rather than systematic
factors: the majority of modes occurring in species
occupying forest habitats (Crump, 1974; Lynch, 1979).
Developmental Spans
Water temperature and aggregation density both
affect the developmental span of tadpoles, although
there is substantial variation in developmental rates
within the progeny hatching from a single clump. Our
observations in the laboratory and field suggest that
this variation is a normal phenomenon, but that in
the wild the ‘slow’ developers die. In Table 4 we have
recorded the means and ranges of the shortest span
in each species. (The shortest span is the period taken
for the first individual of a clump to complete met-
amorphosis.) Recording the shortest span is realistic
because of the ephemeral nature of many of the pools.
Thus abbreviation of the developmental period ensures
survival, whereas those individuals with the longest
developmental span are most prone to perish as the
pool evaporates.
We reared in the laboratory 24 clumps of L. nasuta
spawn, and observed a distinct tendency for the spawn
laid late in the season to complete development in a
shorter span than that laid early in the season (Fig.
15).
At Jabiru water temperatures tend to be highest at
the early part of the wet season; we recorded tadpoles
in water at 42.7°C in early January. This is 3.5°C
higher than the maximum for any species of frog
known to Main (1968) but, as he suspected, is quite
typical of summer diel temperatures experienced by
eggs and tadpoles at localities in northern Australia.
(The maximum noted by Tyler, Davies and Martin
(unpublished) is 45.0°C in a rock pool occupied by
spawn of L. meiriana at Mitchell River Falls, W.A.
in February, 1979.)
REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF THE FROGS OF THE MAGELA CREEK SYSTEM
439
TABLE 4: DEVELOPMENTAL SPANS IN DAYS UNDER FIELD AND LABORATORY CONDITIONS
Field Laboratory
(ca, 30-40°C) (30°C)
n < n x +8.D.
Cyclorana australis 2-2... cece eee I 29 1 37 —
Cyclorana longipes ...0 0000000 cece ee 2 35 (33-37) 7 48 (31-66) 12
LUOrGBICOlg EA lta Seabee ag ft dbs ceed — — 2 53 (25-82) 40
Litoria Caeruled- <2 < ech cn We ene pom eee en _ —_ 10 66 (28-94) 29
Literia coplandt .....60 6000 00 occ cee ee eee 1 §2 1 = =
Litoria inermis ©. 200000000 oc ee ee ee = _ 10 87 (62-117) 20
Litoria sp. nr latopalmata...... 000.0... 0. eee 1 54 7 96 (61-122) 23
Litoria meiriana.. 2... ee es ! 30 1 45 —
LOPE HASLEG... 3. cor eitgak Stewed oe OR bas oe —_ — 23 71.(31-120) 22
ETUOTER VOU Seg ty tare at 3 ft ot ee Sv nelle ns 4 1 65 2 144 (142-146) 3
TCO PI ATUB GHG | erie ates aos bile oa nomi lenesta te wislacis ] 37 5 45 (28-84) 22
Litoria tornieri . 0.00.6 ce ee eee ee — _ 11 97 (62-129) 24
Litoria wotjulumensis .....0000 0000600252000 — _ 5 71 (39-120) 37
Limnodynastes ornatus -. 2... 2-000 ee ee ee | 25 5 38 (21-63) {7
Megistolotis lignarius .......0000000 00 cece esa ee _ — _— 65! —
Ranidella bilingua ...........00..0.22.2-2-4,. 1 142 — = 7
Uperoleia inundata ... 0.0.0.0 022 ee ee ee _ — 1 99 =
'From Tyler et al. (1979)
2From Martin et al. (1980)
LARVAL SPAN
re) i) TS
8 3 3 8 5 S 3
ee ee ee ee | Ce en Ae) es Re fee) Gee |
*
iw)
Oo
oO
g . *
P= .
2
oO ee .
sa
qc
QS
a
(e}
2
Oo e Seee one
ba ees . . bed
m
FIG, 15. Larval life span of Litoria nasuta at differing egg
i
is]
=1
deposition times.
Acknowledgements
We are very deeply indebted to Mr C. Miller who
bore the greatest responsibility in the rearing of the
tadpoles transported to Adelaide, and to the University
of Adelaide for providing the excellent controlled
temperature laboratory in which the work was con-
ducted. We are most grateful to Mr G. Mewett and
Mr B, Pennington of Ansett Airlines of Australia for
considerable assistance in the transportation of live-
stock,
Various persons assisted the field studies. In Dar-
ticular we thank Messrs G. Miles and I. Morris of
the Australian National Parks and Wildlife Service,
and our colleague Dr R. Marchant.
We thank Mrs Jean Russell-Price for typing the
manuscript and Mrs Ruth Hughes for expertly drafting
many of the figures.
Finally we express our gratitude to the Supervising
Scientist for the Alligator Rivers Region who funded
the study, and permitted the publication of this com-
ponent of the results.
440
REFERENCES
BARKER, J. and GRIGG, G. (1977)
Australian frogs.” (Rigby, Sydney.)
CHRISTIAN, C. S, and ALDRICK, J. M. (1977) “Alligator Rivers
Study. A review of the Alligator Rivers Region environmental
fact-finding study.” (Australian Government Publishing Serv-
ice, Canberra.)
COGGER, H. G. (1979) “Reptiles and Amphibians of Australia,”
2nd Edition. (Reed, Sydney.)
CRUMP, M. L. (1974) Reproductive strategies in a tropical anuran
community. Univ. Kansas Mus. Nat. Hist. Misc. Publ. (61):
1-68,
GOSNER, K. L. (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran
embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica
16: 183-190,
HUMPHRIES, R. B. (1979) Dynamics of a breeding frog com-
munity. Ph.D. thesis, Dept of Environmental Biology, Aus-
tralian National University, Canberra. (Unpublished)
“A field gutde to
LYNCH, J. D. (1979) The amphibians of lowland tropical forests.
In W. E. Duellman (Ed.) “The South American Herpetofauna:
Its origin, evolution, and dispersal”. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ.
Kansas, Monogr. (7): 189-215.
MAIN, A. R. (1968) Ecology, systematics and evolution of Aus-
tralian frogs. Adv. Ecol. Res. 5: 37-86.
MARTIN, A. A., TYLER, M. J. and DAVIES, M. (1980) A new
species of Ranidella (Anura: Leptodactylidae) from north-
western Australia. Copeia 1980(1): 93-99.
SALTHE, S. N. and DUELLMAN, W. E. (1973) Quantitative
constraints associated with reproductive mode in anurans.
In J. L. Vial (Ed,) “Evolutionary Biology of the Anurans”.
(University of Missouri Press, Columbia.)
April, 1983
SLATER, P. and MAIN, A. R. (1963) Notes on the biology of
Notaden nichollsi Parker (Anura: Leptodactylidae). W. Aust.
Nat. 8: 163-166.
STRAUGHAN, I. R. (1966) An analysis of species recognition
and species isolation in certain Queensland frogs. Ph.D. thesis,
University of Queensland (unpublished),
TYLER, M. J. (1962) On the preservation of anuran tadpoles.
Aust. J. Sci. 25: 222.
TYLER, M. J. (1979) The impact of European man upon
Australasian amphibians. 7n M. J. Tyler (Ed.) “The Status
of endangered Australasian Wildlife”. (Royal Zoological Soci-
ety of South Australia, Adelaide.)
TYLER, M. J. and CROOK, G. A. (1980) Frogs of the Magela
Creek System. Department of Zoology, University of Adelaide
(mimeographed).
TYLER, M. J., DAVIES, M. and MARTIN, A. A. (1978) A new
specics of hylid frog from the Northern Territory. Trans. R.
Soc, S. Aust. 102: 151-157.
TYLER, M. J, and MARTIN, A. A. (1975) Taxonomic studies
of some Australian leptodactylid frogs of the genus Cyclorana
Steindachner. Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 17(15): 261-276.
TYLER, M. J., MARTIN, A. A. and DAVIES, M. (1979) Biology
and systematics of a new limnodynastine genus (Anura: Lep-
todactylidae) from north-western Australia, Aust. J. Zool.
27: 135-150.
TYLER, M. J., WATSON, G. F. and MARTIN, A. A. (1981) The
Amphibia: diversity and distribution. pp. 1277-1301. In A.
Keast (Ed.) “Ecological Biogeography of Australia”. W. Junk,
The Hague.
WILLIAMS, A. R. (1979) Vegetation and stream pattern as indi-
cators of water movement on the Magela floodplain, Northern
Territory. Aust. J. Ecol. 4: 239-247.
RECORDS oF THE
SOUTH AUSTRALIAN
MUSEUM
VOLUME 18 NUMBERS 19-23 MAY 1984
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
19 THE TAXONOMY OF THE ATRAX ADELAIDENSIS SPECIES —
GROUP (MACROTHELINAE: MYGALOMORPHAE) WITH NOTES ON
BURROWING BEHAVIOUR
by M. R. GRAY
20 THE PSOCOPTERA (INSECTA) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
Z
—_"
22
by C. N. SMITHERS
HELMINTH TYPE — SPECIMENS IN THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN
MUSEUM.
Il ACANTHOCEPHALA AND CESTODA
by LESLEY R. SMALES
HELMINTH TYPE — SPECIMENS IN THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN
MUSEUM.
Il. TREMATODA
by LESLEY R. SMALES
23 AREVISION OF THE GENUS APLEROTUS DALLAS (HETEROPTERA:
PENTATOMIDAE: PENTATOMINAE) WITH DESCRIPTION OF A
NEW SPECIES FROM SOUTH AUSTRALIA
by IMTIAZ AHMAD, NASEER AHMAD KHAN and SYED KAMALUDDIN
SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM
North Terrace, Adelaide
South Australia 5000
THE TAXONOMY OF THE ATRAX ADELAIDENSIS SPECIES-GROUP
(MACROTHELINAE: MYGALOMORPHAE) WITH NOTES ON
BURROWING BEHAVIOUR
BY M. R. GRAY
Summary
The funnel web spiders, genus Atrax, making up the adelaidensis species-group from South
Australia are described: Atrax adelaidensis sp. n., A. eyrei sp. n. and A. flindersi sp. n. Their
distribution in relation to that of the genus is outlined. The absence of a serrula in all species and the
distinctive modification of the first leg in males of A. adelaidensis are recorded. The unique burrow
structure comprising shaft plus side-chamber with trapdoor is described and the presence of a
surface door in early juvenile burrows is noted.
THE TAXONOMY OF THE ATRAX ADELAIDENSIS SPECIES-GROUP
(MACROTHELINAE: MYGALOMORPHAE) WITH NOTES ON BURROWING BEHAVIOUR
by
M. R, GRAY
The Australian Museum, Sydney
ABSTRACT
GRAY, M. R., 1982. The taxonomy of the 4trax ade-
laidensix species-group (Macrothelinae: Mygalomor-
phae) with notes on burrowing behaviour. Rec. S.
Aust, Mus. 18 (19): 441-452.
The funnel web spiders, genus Arrax, making up
the adelaidensis species-group from South Australia
are described: Atrax adelaidensis sp. n,., A. eyrel sp.
n. and A, flindersi sp. n. Their distribution in reta-
tion to that of the genus is outlined. The absence of
a serrula in all species and the distinctive modifica-
tion of the first leg in males of A. adelaidensis are
recorded. The unique burrow structure comprising
shaft plus side-chamber with trapdoor is described
and the presence of a surface door in carly juvenile
burrows. is noted,
INTRODUCTION
Funnel web spiders (genus Atrax O. P. Cam-
bridge, 1877) have a distribution that is essentially
gondwanian. They are commonly represented in
coastal and highland habitats from southern Queens-
land to Tasmania, North of the Gladstone area in
southern Queensland records are available for three
specimens only (all females), from Queensland,
Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands respec-
tively. These records have not been confirmed or
added ta since the orginal collections of 60 to 80
years ago and one of them definitely represents a
locality data errors Anacpsiada (syn, Afrax) ven-
tricosa Rainbow and Pulleine 1918. recorded from
Cloncurry, northwest Queensland in fact was col-
lected from Tamborine Mountain, southeast Queens-
land and is probably a juvenile A. validus Rainbow
and Pulleine, In the drier conditions to the west of
the Great Dividing Range their numbers fall off
rapidly, To the west of the Grampian Range area
in Victoria there appears to be a gap in the distri-
bution of the genus until it reappears again in the
highlands of the Mt. Lofty-southern Flinders Ranges
and the southern Eyre Peninsula of South Australia
(Fig, 32). These westernmost, isolated represen-
tatives of the genus Afrax form the adelaidensis-
group,
NOTATION FOR SPINES
Leg surface abbreviations for spine counts: pd
prodorsal; rd = retrodorsal; py = praventral; rv
May, 1984
South, New South Wales 2000
retroventral. The leg spination data given in the
holotype and paratype descriptions refers to the
range of variation encountered (total spine counts
per surface) both in these specimens and the remain-
ing type series; left and right side leg spine counts
are included,
Atrax adelaidensis group
Diagnosis: Characteristic burrow with — side
chamber closed by trapdoor. Cephalic area
moderately raised, serrula absent. Males lack apo-
physis on leg 2, sometimes with tibia and metatarsus
of leg 1 swoilen.
Comments: The presence of the adclaidensis-
group was first reported by Main (1964) who thea
referred them to the genus Hadronyche L. Koch,
1872. Main (1967, 1976) also noted the burrow
structure, including the presence of a side chamber
closed by a trapdoor. Gray and Sutherland (1978)
indicated that at least three species could be recog-
nised and referred them to the genus Alrax, noting
that their burrow structure set them apart from all
other members. of the genus. Their placement within
Atrax is clearly indicated by the presence of three
tooth rows in the fang grooye, spinose tarsi and
many cuspules om both the labium and maxillae,
The adelaidensis group shows two morphological
features of particular interest. These are the absence
of a serrula and the modification of the first legs
in males of A, adelaidensis, In a survey of mygalo-
morph genera Platnick (1977) recorded the pre-
sence of a serrula in an unidentified species of funnel
web spider, Examination of many eastern funnel web
specics by the present author indicates thut serrula
development in Atrax is highly yariable—in some
species the serrula is large and obvious, in others
reduced or absent (Plates 5-7), The modification of
the first leg in males of A. adelaidensis (Fig, 2) 1s
most unusual for this genus. In other funnel web
species it is the second leg that may show signifi-
cant modification in the form of tibial and metatarsal
apophyses. Not only the position but also the type of
modification differs in A, ddelaidensis, where the
entire first metatarsus and tibia are swollen. A slight
swelling of the second metatarsus is alsa evident.
This modification of the first leg may be of signi-
ficance in the context of the generic relationships of
dd2
Ajtrax, The systematic position of the genus as a
memiber of the family Dipluridac has Jong been
problematical, Diplurid genera possessing male
second leg modifications such as Evagrus Ausserer
and Allothele Tucker are not closely related to
Atrax, Simon (1892) used the presence of numerous.
cuspules on the labinm and maxillac as key charace
ters in his recognition of the genera Atrax, Porrothele
Simon and Macrothele Ausserer in his Macrotheleae
and Raven (1980) considers that these. geneta com-
prise a natural grouping within his Hexathelidae.
Zoogeographically, as well as morphologically and
behaviourally, the New Zealand genus Porrothele ts a
logical candidate for relationship with Avray.
Thickening of Jeg segments in these genera may be
independent derivations but could be additional
indicators of relationship.
The distribution limits of the Adelaidensis species
are not clear as yet. However, the general areas of
Species distribution can be approximately defined us
follows: 4. adelaidensis—Mt. Lofty Range and
adjacent coastal plain; A. eyrei—southern Eyre
Peninsula; A, flindersi—southern Flinders Range
(Fig, 32). These areas correspond with open forest
habitats of the type best developed in the Mt. Lofty
Rangs. In drier areas such as the Flinders Range
the spiders tend to be concentrated in tiparian
habitats where open forest (though with a reduced
understory) persists.
KEY TO FEMALES
1, Prodorsal surface of patella CE with 18 to 26 spines.
Pigmented lawer lateral surface of abdomen marked
with severa] paler bars .. ..., Atrax adelaidensis
—Prodorsal surface of patella ILL with 6 to 9 spines.
Lateral] abdominal surface without pale bars... . 2
2. Abdominal pigmentation almost uniformly distributed,
only slightly reduced laterally and ventrally M.O.Q,
length to posterior width ratio more than 1:2
Leno , Atras. ayrel
—Abdoniinal pipticniatiost porniusntritsd ‘dorsally and
posteriorly, lateral and ventral surfaces much paler,
M.O,Q, Jength to posterior width ratio less than 1;2
Puicxcctkcoarhias cevworevyr end ctasee 00a ys:net CELESTE, Fee Alrax flindersi
KEY TO MALES
1. Vibia and metatarsus of lag 1 swollen. Tibia 1 with
2 ventral spines distally; metatarsus I with 25-30
ventral spines .,...., Atrax adelaidensis
—Leg; | unmodified, ‘Tibia 1 with 6-10 ventral spines;
metatarsus L with 14-16 ventral spines |
A tite flindersi
Atrax adelaidensis sp. n.
(Figs. 1-11, pl. 5)
Diagnosis: Prodorsal surface of patella HL with
18 to 26 spines, 8 to 11 on patella ITV, Female
abdomen pigmented dorsally and laterally but three
REC, §, AUST. MUS. 1& (19): 441-452.
May, 1084
to five pale bars on lower lateral surface of abdo-
men; ventral abdomen pale. Tibia I and. metatarsus
T and II of males swollen, Male metatarsus I with
25-30 spines ventrally. Middle third of ventral fang
graave with few or no teeth in male.
Pemale—HOLOTYPE N1979146
Measurements (nim) and markings: Total Jength
(including cheliccrae) 18.98, Carapace length 6.78;
width 5.88; height 3.35, Abdomen length 9.30;
width 6.40, Colour pattern—Carapace dark glossy
brown-black, sparsely haired, Black pigment around
eyes, Dorsal and Jateral surfaces of abdomen dark
maroon-broWn. Ventrally and above the spinnerets
pigmentation greatly reduced. Three to five pale
bars extend from yentral surface up anto darkly
pigmented lateral surface, Above spinnerets, small
sector of pigmented cuticle cut off by narrow semi-
circular band of non-pigmented cuticle. Abdominal
cuticle finely rugose, depressed intervals between
rugosities formed by numerous, small, non-pig-
mented, sub-circular to elongate depressions. Along
dorso-lateral surfaces three pairs of pale: markings,
anterior pair roughly circular, posterior pairs thin,
laterally elongated lines.
Cephalathorax: Eyes—Size (mm): AME. 0,19,
ALE 0.32, PLE 0.26, PME 0,17. Interdistances
(mm); AME-AME 0,34, AME-ALE 0.24, ALE-
PLE 0.23, PLE-PME 0,13, PME-PME 0,73,
M.O.Q, length 0.51 mm; width, anterior 0.69 mm,
posterior 0.91 mm. M.O.0O. length/posterjor width
ratio 121.78, Anterior cye row straight, width 1.67
mm. Posterior eye row recurved, width 1.68 mm.
Carapace—longer than wide in ratio 1:00.87; raised
in head region, height/length ratio 1:2.02. Fovea
deep and strongly procurved, anterior margin
smoothly curved. Chelicerae—inner margins of fang
groove with 11 teeth (9 large) outer margin with
11 large teeth; centre of groove with 23 small teeth
in single row, less regular apically and basally.
Labium—wider than long in ratio 1.45;1, cuspules
numerous. Maxillae—divergent with shart, conical
lobe apically, Cuspules mumerous, few apically;
serrula absent. Sternum—subcircular; length 3,81
mm, width 3.62 mm, Surface gently convex with
thin cover of long and short hairs. Three pairs of
sigilla, posterior pair large and oval, anterior pair
very small, ciccolar.
Legs: 4123. Length (mm); I 15.45; 12 14.39;
Hi 11.64; IV 15.57. Spination: I—rmetatarsus vy
5-6, tarsus py 3-8, rv 3-4, v 0-1; 1l—melatarsus p
1, v 5-7, tarsus pv 4-11, rv 3-5; I1l—patella pd
18-26, tihia p 7-8, ¢ 2-3, metatarsus p 5-8, pa 2-4,
rd 2-3, v 5-7, tarsus py 10-13, ry 2-5; ['¥V—patella
pd 8-11, tibia p 2, metatarsus p 6-7, rd 0-2, v 6-7,
tarsus py 10-12, Trichobothria in single raw on
443
ATRAX ADELAIDENSIS SPECIES-GROUP
FIGS. 1-11: Atrax adelaidensis. 1, Carapace, dorsal (female), x6; 2, Leg 1, retrolateral (male), x11; 3, Leg 3, prolateral
(female): patella, tibia and metatarsus, x11; 4, Male copwatory organ, x20; 5, Female internal genitalia, dorsal,
x20; 6, Eyes (female), x20; 7, Body, dorsal (male) x6; 8, Palp, prolateral (male), x6; 9, Tooth pattern in fang
groove, left hand side (female), x20; 10, Tooth pattern in fang groove, right hand side (male), x20; 11, Body, side
view (female), x6.
444
larsus, bothria collariform, Superior tarsal claws
with three to six pectinations, inferior claw smooth.
Tarsal scopulae absent. Tarsal organ distal to tri-
chabothria, a low circulac mound with faintly
sculpted, concentric grooves,
Abdomen; Spinnerets—Posterior lateral spin-
merets: length 2.35-2.58 mms; width 0,79-0,82; ratio
of length of apical, middle and basal segment 2.2:
1:1.6; basal separation 1.10 mm; terminal segment
conical, longer than wide in ratio 1,95;1, Posterior
median spinnerets: Jength 1.02; width 0.52 mm,
Genitalia—a pair of spermathecae open ventrally
into common copulatory bursa, Middle part of each
spermatheca swollen.
Male—PARATYPE N1979145
Measurements (mm) and markings: Total length
(including chelicerae) 16.1. Carapace length 5.92,
width 5.58, height 2,71, Abdomen length 6.8, width
4.8, Colour pattern—similar to female except that
the dorso-lateral abdominal markings more evident;
lateral abdomen uniformly pigmented, no pale bars
present.
Cepholathorax: Eyes—Size (mm): AME 0.23,
ALE 0,32; PLE 0.23; PME 0.14. Interdistances
(mm): AME-AME 0,17; AME-ALE 0.16; ALE-
PLE 0.20, PLE-PME 0.11, PME-PME 0.69:
M.O,Q. length 0.47 mm, anterior width 0,61 mm,
posterior width 0.97 mm. M.O,Q. length/posterior
width ratio 1;2,06, Anterior eye row slightly pro-
clirved, width 1.55 mm. Posterior eye row recurved,
width 1.60 mm, Carapace—longer than wide in
ratio 1;0.94, Raised in head region, height/length
ratio 1:2.18. Chelicerae—inner margin of fang
groove with 10-11 teeth (9 large): outer margin
with 13 teeth (11-13 large); central groave with a
Taw of 2-4 small teeth in apical third, none or
reduced in central third, a row of 7-10 small teeth
in basal third. Palp—distal prodorsal femur with
4-6 sinuous bristles; patella with 4-7 dorsal apical
bristles, Embolic process of palpal bulb short
and broad with well developed apical flange. Labium
—wider than long in ratio 1:1.61, cuspules
numerous, Sternum—tength 3.63 mm, width 3.03
mm.
Legs; 1423 (or 4123), Length (nim): 1 18.41
(19,30); 11 17.55 (18.93); If 14.39 (15,35); IV
17.85 (19.60). Anterior legs modified, tibia I and
metatarsus I swollen; metatarsus IT weakly swollen.
Tarsi weakly scopulate. Spination: I—tibia v 1-2,
metatarsus p 0-2, y 25-30, tarsus py 10-12, rv 7-11,
v 0-2; Il—femur d 0-1, patella r 0-1, bia p 0-1,
v 1-2, metatarsus p 0-1, r 0-2, y 12-16, tarsus py
10-16, rv 6-21, v Q-1; [1l—patella pd 18-23, tibia
pd 9-11, ¢ 3, ¥ 1-7, metatarsus p 8-13, pd 0-4, r
REC, S. AUST. MUS, 18. (19); 441-452,
May, 1984
1-6, rd 2-5, v 8-14, tarsus p 12-16, r 0-2, rv 6-9,
v 0-1; IV—femur d 4, patella pd 7-8, tibia p 2-3,
r 2-4, d 1-2, v 2-4, metatarsuis p 8, rd 1-2,.v 8-12,
tarsus p 14-17, rv 6-11, v O-1_ Single row of 3 to 5
weak bristles on dorsal surfaces of femora I, If, IV.
Abdomen; Spinnerets—postcrior lateral spin-
nerets; length 2.60 mm; maximum width 0.56 mm}
ratio of length of apical, middle and basal segments
1.55:121.79; basal separation 0,95 mm; apical sep-
ment conical, length/width ratio 2/82:1. Posterior
median spinverets; length 0,77 mm, width 0.31 mm.
Material examined: Holotype female (N1979146
S.A. Mus. coll), Hackuey, Adelaide, S.A. 16.11,
1973, J. Batt; burrow in sloping, littered ground on
banks of Torrens River. Paratype male (N1979145
S.A. Mus. coll), St. Peters C.G.S., Adelaide, S.A,
3,6,1971, D, Edwards Paratype female (KS 4511
Aust, Mus. call), Beefacres Recreation Reserve,
S.A., 16.11.1973, N. Miles; found in damp sandy
soil under tree stump. Paratype male (KS 4512
Aust, Mus. coll.), Belair, Mt Lotty Range, S.A.
24.5.1972, Two paratype males (N1979147.
N1979148 S.A, Mus, coll.), Clare, S.A, 5.8,1979.
Paratype female (N1979149 S_A. Mus coll.), Ros-
trevor, Nr. Adelaide, $.A., May 1974, B. Brewer; in
burrow, shaded alluvial soil by creek, Juvenile,
Hahndorf, Mt. Lofty Range, S.A.
Atrax eyrei sp. v1.
(Figs. 12-19)
Diagnosis; Prodorsal surface of patella ITT with
8 to 9 spines; O to 1 on patella TV, Abdominal
pigmentation almost uniform, only slightly paler
laterally and ventrally. Posterior median cyes widely
separated; M,0.Q, Jength/posterior width ratio
much greater than 1:2,
Female—HOLOTYPE KS 4509
Measurements (mm) and markings: Total length
(including chelicerae) 16.14, Carapace length 6.62;
width 5.93; height 3.38, Abdomen length 8.1; width
5.9. Colour pattern—Carapace dark, glossy brown-
black, sparsely haired. Black pigment around eyes.
Abdomen dark maroon-brown dorsolaterally, ventral
surface only slightly paler, Abdominal cuticle finely
rugose with small, subcircular to elongate nonpig-
mented depressions between rugosilies. Dorsoiateral
abdominal surfaces with four pairs of non-pigmented
Markings, anterior pair sub-circular, remainder
laterally elongate.
Cephalothorax; Eyes—Size (mm): AME 0.23,
ALE 0.30, PLE 0,19, PME 0.13, Tnterdistances:
AME-AME 0.28, AME-ALE 0.20, ALE-PLE 0.18,
PLE-PME 0.06, PME-PME 0.91, M.O.Q. length
0.47, anterior width 0,71, posterior width 1.21.
M.0.Q. fength/posterior width ratio 1;3,37.
ATRAX ADELAIDENSIS SPECIES-GROUP dd5
TARR AAA
: the
FIGS, 12-19; Atrax evrei. 12, Body, dorsal (female), x6; 13, Abdomen, side view (female), x6; 14, Tooth patlern in
fung groove, left hand side (female), x20; 15, Spinnerets, ventral (female), x20, 16, Femule internal genitalia,
dorsal, X20; 17, Eyes, dorsul (female), x20; 18, Leg 3, prolateral (female); patella, tibia and metatarsus, x Jl, 19,
Maxillae, labium and sternum, ventral (female), x6.
Anterior eye row straight, width 1.62 mm) posterior
eye row recurved, width 1.61 mm. Carapace—
longer than wide in ratio 1:0,90; raised in head
region, height/length ratio 1:1.96. Fovea procurved,
anterior margin slightly indented on each side of
midline. Chelicerag—inner margin of fang grooye
with 13-14 teeth (J0 Jarge), outer margin with
10 large teeth, central groove with 20-23 small teeth
in irregular cow. Labium—wider than long in ratio
1.45:1, numerous. cuspules. Maxillae—divergent
with short conical Jobe apically, serrula absent;
cuspules numerous, few apically, Sternum—subcir-
cular; length 3.90 mm, width 3.65 mm. Surface
gently convex with thin covering of long and short
hairs. Three pairs of sigillae, posterior pair large
and oval, anterior pair very small, circular.
Legs; 4123. Length (mm): I 16.02; Il 14.40;
THE 12.41; IV 16,03. Spination: I—metatarsus v 8,
tarsus pv 3, rv 5, v 1; [[—metatarsus p 0-1, v 9,
446
abe
PLATES 1-4, Atrax flindersi. 1, open forest habitat, Mt. Remarkable, S.A.; 2, juvenile in fee
REC. 8S. AUST. MUS. 18 (19): 441-452.
May, 1984
ce
4.
ding position, door stand-
as
ing open, silk trip lines radiating from burrow rim; 3-4, surface door of juvenile, 3, closed; 4, open.
tarsus pv 4-5, rv 4; I[I—patella pd 8-9, tibia p 4,
r 1-2, metatarsus p 4-5, pd 2, rd 1-2, v 9, tarsus
pv 8-9, rv 4; 1V—patella pd 0-1, tibia p 1, meta-
tarsus p 2, v 5-8, tarsus pv 7-9, rv 2. Trichobothria
in single row on tarsus, bothria collariform. Superior
tarsal claws with 5-6 pectinations, inferior claws
smooth or with 1 pectination. Tarsal scopulae
absent.
Abdomen: Spinnerets—posterior lateral spin-
nerets: length 2.67-2.72 mm; width 0.90-0.94 mm;
ratio of length of apical, middle and basal segments
1.08:1:1.60; basal separation 1.30 mm; terminal
segment conical, longer than wide in ratio 1.86:1.
Posterior median spinnerets: length 0.94 mm; width
0.47 mm. Genitalia—pair of short, broad sperma-
thecae opening ventrally into a common copulatory
bursa.
Material examined: Holotype female (KS 4509
Aust, Mus. coll.), 6.5 km south of Coulta, Eyre
Peninsula, S.A. 18.12.1952. B. Y. Main (cat. no.
52/600). Paratype female (KS 4510 Aust. Mus.
coll.), between Coulta and Wangary, Eyre Penin-
sula, S.A., 18.12.1952. B. Y. Main (cat. no. 52/
611). Juvenile male, Nr. Port Lincoln, Eyre Penin-
sula, S.A., 16.12.1952, B. Y. Main (cat. no. 52/
540).
Atrax flindersi sp. n.
(Figs. 20-30, pls 1-4, 6)
Diagnosis: Prodorsal surface of patella ILI with
5 to 10 spines; 0 to 3 on patella TV. Abdominal
pigmentation mainly dorsal; lateral and ventral
surfaces paler. Femur I of male with 7-9 spines
dorsally, femur If of male with 5-7. Tibia I of male
with 6-10 ventral spines, tibia Il of male with 8-10.
ATRAX ADELAIDENSIS SPECIES-GROUP
447
PLATES 5-8. 5, Atrax adelaidensis, tarsal organ, x1250. 6-8, apical lobe of maxilla showing serrula structure variation
in three species of funnel web spider; 6, A. flindersi (serrula absent), x165; 7, A. robustus, x90; 8, A. versutus, x60.
Female—HOLOTYPE KS 983
Measurements (mm) and markings: Total length
(including chelicerae) 20.02. Carapace length 6.90;
width 6.12; height 3.37. Abdomen length 9.1; width
7.3. Colour pattern—carapace dark glossy brown-
black, sparsely haired. Black pigment around eyes.
Abdominal pigmentation dark maroon-brown dor-
sally, pigmented area narrow anteriorly, broader
posteriorly. Lateral and ventral abdomen very lightly
pigmented and tinged with pink. Abdomen cuticle
finely rugose with small subcircular to elongate
non-pigmented depressions between rugosities.
Dorso-lateral abdominal surfaces with four pairs of
non-pigmented markings, anterior pair subcircular,
remainder elongated and rather indistinct.
448
Cephalothorax; Eyes—Size (mm): AME 6.23,
ALE. 0.34, PLE 0,31. PME 0.18. Interdistances:
AME-AME 0.27, AME-ALE 0.25, ALE-PLE 0.26,
PLE-PME 0,11, PME-PME 0.78. M.O.Q, length
0,65, anterior width 0.67, posterior width 1.12.
M,©.Q, length/posterior width ratia 121.72.
Anterior eye row straight, width 1,65 mm; posterior
eye row recurved, width 1.80 mm. Carapace—longer
than wide in ratio 1:0.89; raised im head region,
height/length ratio 1:2.01. Fovea deep and strongly
procurved, anterior margin with broad shallow in-
dentation centrally, Chelicerse—inner margin of
fang groove with 14-16 teeth (12-15 large); outer
margin with 15-18 teeth (12 large); central groove
with 23-27 small teeth in irregular row, divided into
two rows apically, Labium—wider than long in
ratio 1.4071, numerous cuspules. Maxillac—diver-
gent, ameally with short conical lobes, serrula
absent; cuspules numerous, few apically, Sterrum—
subcircular to oval; length 4.04 mm, width 3,66 mm.
Surface gently convex with thin covering of long
and short hairs, Three pairs of sigilla, posterior pair
large and oval. Anterior pair yery small, circular.
Legs; 4123. Length (mm): T 16,33; IT 14.93;
IIT 13,36; TV 16,79. Spination: I—metatarsus v 7-9,
tarsus. pv 4-5, rv 5-6; [[—mietatarsus p 0-1, v 8-10,
tarsus pv 4-5, rv 4-8; I[1]—patella pd 5-10, tibia
p 4, r 1-2, v 6-1, metatarsus p 2-5, pd 2-3, rd 2,
v 7-10, tarsus py 10-14, rv 4, y 0-1; [V—patella pd
0-2, tibia p O-1, y 0-1, metatarsus p I-4, rd 0-1, v
4-8, tarsus pv 6-15, rv 0-3. Superior tarsal claws
5-7 pectinations, inferior claws smooth, Tarsal sco-
pulae absent. Tarsal organ distal to trichobothria,
low circular mound with faint concentric grooves.
Abdomen: Spinuerets—posterior lateral spin-
nerets; length 3,53 mm; width 1.02 mm; ratio of
length of apical, middle and basal segments 1.78: 1:
1,62; basal separation 1.48 mm; terminal segment
conical, longer than wide in ratio 2,56:1, Posterior
median spinnerets: length 0.94 mm, width 0.47 mm,
Genitalia—a pair of rather slender spermathecae,
terminally swollen, opening ventrally into common
copulatory bursa.
Male—PARATYPE KS 980
Measurements (mini) and markings; Total length
(including chelicerae) 16.80. Carapace length 6,23;
width 6.29; height 3.06, Abdomen length 7.50;
width 5,70, Colour pattern—as for female; paired
abdominal markings slightly more emphatic,
Cephalotherax: Eyes—Size (mm): AME 0.26,
ALE 0,35, PLE 0.23, PME 0,15, Interdistances
(mm): AME-AME 0.26, AME-ALE 0,12, ALE-
PLE 0.24, PLE-PME 0.12, PME-PME 0,82,
M,O.Q. length 0.58, antetior width 0.74, posterior
REC. 5, AUST, MUS, 18 (19): 441-452,
Muay, 1¥d¢
width 1.18. M.O.Q, length/posterior width ratio
1:2.03, Anterior eye row straighi, width 1.59 mm.
Posterior eye row recurved, width 1.64 mm, Cars-
pace—slightly wider than long in ratio 1:0.99.
Raised in head region, height/icngth ratio 1:2.04.
Foyea decp, procurved, anterior margin smoothly
curved, Chelicerae—inner margin of fang groove
with 12 teeth (10-12 Jarge), outer margin with 14-
15 teeth (12-13 large), central groove with 18-19
small teeth in single row, Palp—temur with 7 pro-
dorsal, apical spines; patella with 14 dorsal, apical
spines. Embolic process of palpal bulb straight and
slender with well developed apical Hange. Labium—
Wider than long in ratio 1.54;1, Sternum—subcir-
cular; length 3.46 mm; width 3.26 mm. Sigillae
as in female but placed closer to lateral margins
and anterior sigilla much more distinct.
Legs: 4123. Length (mm): 1 19,46; I 18,24;
TH 17,82; TV 21.39, First and second legs unmodi-
fied, Tarsi of legs IIT and IV mildly swollen. Tarsal
Scopulae present, strongly developed on legs II,
TIT and SY. Spination: I—femur p 0-2, d 7-9, tibia
p 0-1, v 6-10, metatarsus p 0-2, v 12-15, tarsus
py 8-9, rv 9-12, v 1-3; I—femur d 5-7, tibia v
8-10, metatarsus y 12-13, tarsus py 9-10, rv 8-10,
v O-1; Til—femur d 0-1, patella pd 5-8, tibia p
4-7, r 1-4, d 1-4, d 1, v 4-6, metatarsus p 2-8; r
2-3, rd 2-3, y 11-15, tarsus p 8-12 r 0-2, rv 8-14;
IV—femur d 5-6, patella p 0-3, tibia p 1-4, r 3-5,
d 0-3, y 4-6, metatarsus p 3-5, re 0-2, v 11-15,
tarsus p 9-15, rv 8-11,
Abdomen: Spinnerets—Posterior lateral spin-
nerets: length 3.30 mm; width 0.71 mm; ratio af
length of apical, middle and basal segments 1.12:1:
1.24; basal separation 1.40 mm; terminal segment a
slender cone, longer than wide in ratio 3.49: 1. Pos-
terior median spinnerets cylindrical; length 0.91 mm,
width 0.36 mm,
Material examined: Holotype female (KS 983
Aust. Mus. coll.), Mt, Remarkable (lower slopes),
3 km, north of Melrose, Flinders Range, S,A,,
23.4.1973, M, and G. Gray. Dry open and eucalypt
forest, burrow with side passage in littered riparian
slope; juvernles in side passage, Paratype male (KS
980 Aust. Mus, coll.), Mt, Remarkable (lower
slopes), 3 km north ot Melrose, Flinders Range,
S.A... 25,4,1973, M. and G. Gray; pitfall trap in
dry open forest on southern eastern slope, Paratype
males (KS 979 and KS 985 Aust. Mus. coli.) and
female (KS 981 Aust. Mus. coll.), Mt. Remarkable
(lower slopes), 3 km north of Melrose, Flinders
Range, $.A,. March-April 1973, M. and G. Gray;
dry open euclaypt forest, sloping ground with
medium-heavy litter cover,
ATRAX ADELAIDENSIS SPECIES-GROUP 449
“9
2)
©
)
?
t
Fal
ON
f
e)
an
)
~
}
ceeP9 9 OF on 50
f
rey
pal
oo
-c
5
2 0
ia §
e%9 0°250
wewt0U
o
ofa ok OF
er* geoo
o%
FIGS, 20-30: Atrax flindersi, 20, Leg 3, prolateral (female): patella, tibia and metatarsus, x11; 21, Abdomen, side view
(female), x6; 22, Carapace, dorsal (female), x6; 23, Palp, prolateral (male), x11; 24, Male copulatory organ, x20;
25, Tooth pattern in fang groove, right hand side (female), x20; 26, Tooth pattern in fang groove, right hand
side (male), x20; 27, Eyes, dorsal (female), x20; 28, Body, dorsal (male), x6; 29, Female internal genitalia, dorsal,
x20; 30, Leg 1, retrolateral (male), x11.
450
BEHAVIOURAL OBSERVATIONS ON
ATRAX FLINDERSI
Field observations
Summer collections of A. flindersi were made on
riparian slopes in the summer-dry, open eucalypt
forest habitats of the Mt. Remarkable area (Plate
1). The retreat is a ground-burrow consisting of a
main shaft plus a side chamber closed by a door
(Fig. 31). The burrow has a single entrance which
is hidden amongst the well-developed litter layer of
the forest floor. The burrow may be sited in an
open situation or in the shelter of a grass tussack,
log or stump. This retreat structure contrasts
markedly with that typical of many easterm members
of the genus occupying wetter forest habitats (Gray
1978),
The entrance to the adult burrow consists of a
silk collar which in 4. flindersi is produced around
one side to form a short cowl-like structure which
lies limply across the entrance partially occluding
it, The silk of both collar and cowl is well disguised
hy attached litter and fine soil particles.
The silk lining of the main shaft is entire and
closely adherent to the soil walls. Total burrow
depth varied from 21 to 25 mm; burrow diameter
varied from 1-1.5 cm near the entrance to 2-2,5
cm in the end chamber. The general inclination of
the burrow is at 90° to the ground slope, though the
end chamber below the lJevel of the side chamber
may be less steeply inclined,
BIG. 31. Burrow structure of Alrax flinderst
REC_S. AUST, MUS, 18 (19): 441-452
May, 1984
The silk-lined, flask-shaped side chamber (length
3-4.5 em; widih 2-2.5 em in adult burrows) was
placed between three-quarters and four-fifths of the
way down the burrow of adult specimens, In the
burrows of juveniles the side chamber may be only.
half-way or even less down the burrow. The side
chamber is closed by a strong, externally concave,
s0il trapdoor, hinged vertically (diameter 0.85-1 5 cm
in adult burrows), The usual orientation of the side
chamber was slightly upslope, but this was not in-
variable, A shallow excavation in the wall of the
main shaft at the leyel of the trapdoor probably
ptovides space for manocuvring during door open-
ing operations.
The functions of the side chamber seem mainly
concerned with the provision of a secure refuge
against predators, particularly when moulting, and
a protective brood chamber for the eggs and spider-
lings. Several Afrax burrows were found to contain
occupants which could represent predators—a cen-
tipede, a large carabid beetle and a spider—the latter
belonged to the genus 4nane and was found with
the remains of the presumed original occupant. One
burrow contained a brood of 21 spiderlings in the side
chamber, The need to function as a brood chamber
during the hot summer months could account for the
trend suggesting that adult side chambers are found at
greater depths relative to total burrow depth than
those of fuvenjles; brood chamber function would
require long term constancy of high humidity—
moderate temperature conditions which would not
be so eritical for the temporary predator/moulting
refuge function which must be the primary role of
the shallower side chamber of juvenile burrows.
Morphological adaptations to aridity are not
readily upparent in any of the adelaidensis species.
Consequently, in swnmer-drought regions such as
the Flinders Range the construction of a relatively
deep, vertical ground burrow has obvious advan-
tages in avoiding desiccation and overheating. Soil
characteristics may also be significant, particularly
in relation to their water-holding ability which
directly influences soil and burrow air-water humi-
dity, The burrows of A. /lindersi were excayated
in a yellow-grey, gritty loam. Evidence from trap-
door spider burrow studies indicates that such soil
would require severe surface drying conditions to
render the soil air significantly undcrsaturated helow
10 cm from the surface (Gray 1969). The surface
litter cover would provide a further cushioning
effect against environmental drying.
Laboratory observations
Fifteen juveniles (probably second instar) taken
from the side chamber of a burrow in the ML.
Remarkable area were set up individually in glass
jars with 10 cm depth of lightly littered soil. All
ATRAX ADELAIDENSIS SPECIES-GROUP
eS TTL TIOIN Ge PURE WER
SPIDERY GLhals aFnay
451
4 adelaidensis
m eyrei
e flindersi
32
FIG, 32, Distribution records for the Atrax adelaidensis species-group in South Australia. Inset—overall distribution of
the genus Atrax.
juveniles excavated small burrows and twelve of
them constructed flap-like, but quite rigid, soil
trapdoors closing the surface burrow entrances
(Plate 2, 3). The remainder constructed an inde-
finite soil-silk entrance mound. When hunting, the
juveniles would prop the door wide open at an
angle of 70-100° and sit in the burrow mouth with
the tarsi of the palps and first two pairs of legs
resting on the burrow rim (Plate 4). Some shect-
like silk was placed on the ground around the burrow
entrance, usually radiating outwards as prey trip-
lines. In catching prey the spiderlings were seen to
fully emerge from the burrow up to a distance of
2 cm, Examination of these burrows revealed that
no side chamber was present, the burrow consisting
of a simple, vertical shaft. The discovery of surface
door building behaviour in A. flindersi spiderlings
is interesting in view of its absence in the adults
and larger juveniles. However, in the context of the
environmental conditions that the juveniles face,
adaptive advantages can be seen. The major advan-
tages would seem to be that the microclimate within
a shallow burrow closed by a surface door is likely
to be more stable than that found within an open
or partially closed burrow; and in the absence of a
side chamber refuge, the surface door may serve to
decrease predation on spiderlings. The burrows of
larger juvenile spiders kept in captivity showed no
sign of a surface door, a mixture of soil and silk
usually partially closing the entrance leaving only a
small opening to one side or none at all. A side
chamber with door was always present in these
burrows.
The initial stages of burrowing activity by some
of these juveniles were observed. The litter adjacent
to the burrow site was silked together and drawn in-
wards. The soil surface to be excavated was thinly
silked over, a process repeated with each phase of
digging, and the chelicerae used to loosen the soil.
Both chelicerae and palps combined to scrape up
and carry away the soil as silk-impregnated bundles
which were initially deposited (and tamped down
by the palps) just outside the burrow lip. Frequent
360° traverses were made with the spinnerets about
the lip area of the burrow so building up a soil-
impregnated silk collar attached to the surrounding
452
litter. This collar was periodically raised slightly
by the palps and first legs and the whole jerked in
centrally.
At this stage a shallow inclined burrow approxi-
mately 2 cm deep and 1.5 cm wide had been ex-
cayated. A second opening or “window”, about
half the size of the original entrance, was then
made in the thin roof of the burrow; this “window”
apparently proyided room for manoeuvring while
excavating the bottom of the burrow, the spider's
abdomen being protruded out of it during turning
and digging operations. Subsequent activity took
place entirely within the burrow. Soil was pro-
gressively added to the internal margins of both
entrance and window until the latter was com-
pletely closed over. The entrance was eventually
reduced to a small irregular hole 2-3 mm wide
REC, 8. AUST, MUS. 18 (19): 441-452
May, 1984
located near the lower edge of the original entrance.
This location arose because the direction of deposi-
tion of soil proceeded from the upper toward the
lower margin of the entrance. The soil-impregnated
silk curtain so formed over the burrow entrance
can be seen to have affinities both with the cowl-like
entrance structure noted in the field situation and
the soil door built by captive second instar juveniles.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
My thanks to Dr. B. Y. Main for the loan of speci-
mens from the Eyre Peninsula and locality data for
the Melrose area, I am grateful to Mr. D. C. Lee
of the South Australian Museum for his co-operation
in the provision of facilities and the loan of material.
Drawing assistance was provided by G. E. J. Gray.
REFERENCES
GRAY, M. R. 1968. “Adaptations to Aridity in Trapdoor
Spiders”. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Western Australia,
Library.
GRAY, M, R., and SUTHERLAND, S. K. 1978. Venoms
of Dipluridae: 121-148—/n “Systematics and Distri-
bution in Arthropod Yenoms” (S. Bettini, ed.) Hand-
book Exper. Pharmac., 48: 121-148.
MAIN, B. Y. 1964. “Spiders of Australia”
Jacaranda Press, Brisbane.
(2nd ed.).
MAIN, B. Y. 1976. “Spiders.” Australian Naturalist Library
—wWilliam Collins, Sydney.
PLATNICK, N, I. 1977. The Hypochiloid Spiders: a
Cladistic Analysis, with notes on the Atypoidea (Arach-
nida, Araneae). Amer. Mus. Novit, 2627: 1-23.
RAVEN, R, 1980. The evolution and biogeography of the
mygalomorph spider family Hexathelidae (Araneae,
Chelicerata). J. Arachnol. 8: 251-266.
SIMON, E. 1892, “Histoire Naturelle des Araignees”, Vol.
1, 2nd ed., Libraire Encyclopedique de Roret, Paris.
THE PSOCOPTERA (INSECTA) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
BY C. N. SMITHERS
Summary
The number of Psocoptera known from South Australia is increased from 8 to 45, including 16 new
species and 21 new records for the State. The fauna appears to be predominantly associated with
bark and dried leaves as opposed to green foliage. The relationships of the fauna are discussed
briefly within the context of present records of the Australian fauna.
THE PSOCOPTERA (INSECTA) OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
by
Cc. N. SMITHERS
The Australian Museum, 6-8 College Street, Sydney, N.S.W. 2000
ABSTRACT
SMITHERS, C. N., 1982. The Psocoptera (Insecta) of
South Ausiralia. Rec. S. Aust, Mis. 18 (20): 453-491,
The oumber of Psocoptera known from South
Australia is increased from 8 to 45, including 16
new species and 21 new records for the State. The
fauna appears to be predominantly associated with
bark and dried leaves as opposed to green foliage.
The relationships of the fauna are discussed briefly
within the context of present records of the Aus-
tralian fauna.
INTRODUCTION
Two significant recent collections of Psocoptera
from South Australia have prompted a detailed
study of all material available from this area the
results of which are presented here.
The first Psocoptera from South Australia were
described by McLachlan (1866). He described
Psocus pallipes McLachlan from Adelaide, trans-
ferring it to Prepsocus in a postscript to the same
paper. It has since been recorded from Western
Australia, Queensland and New South Wales. He
also described Psocus striatifrons McLachlan from
“Australia, meridionali”, transferring it immediately
to Stenopsocus Hagen, This species has not been
recorded again and it is possible that it may not
be South Australian even if it docs occur elsewhere
in southern Australia, The type locality is not pre-
cisely known, Stenvpsocus is a Palaearctic and
Oriental genus with one species in New Guinea and
eastern Australia which has been found as far south
as northern New South Wales. §. striatifrons is cer-
tainly not the same species. Detailed study of the
type of S. striatifrans is necessary to clarify its status
and confirm its generic position. Banks (1939)
described Zelandopsocus sinuosus Banks from “Mt.
Lofty Range”. This species is now placed in Aus-
tropsocus Smithers and has been recorded from
Tasmania, Victoria, Australian Capital Territory,
New South Wales and Queensland, Smithers (1964a)
recorded the widespread Lepinotus reticulatus Endet-
lein and Psyllipsocus ramburii Selys-Longchamps
from caves in South Austraha and Phlotodes aus-
tralis (Brauer) from several localities (Smithers
1964b), ‘Thornton and New (1977) recorded
Haplephallus bundoorensis New and H. medialis
Thornton and New from South Australia. The
former is known from Victoria, Queensland and
New South Wales and the latter fram New South
Wales, Australian Capital Territory and Victoria.
So. by 1977 eight species had been recorded from
South Australia,
This paper is based on collections in the Aus-
tralian Museum and the South Australian Museum.
These include 41 species, of which four have already
been recorded fram South Australia. Four of the
recorded species are not represented in ihe present
material, 21 are new records for the State (marked
with ao asterisk in the Jist belaw) and 16 are new
species, In all, 45 species (including $. striatifrons)
are now known from South Australia,
The Psocoplera so far recorded from South Aus-
tralia are nearly all inhabitants of bark or dead
leaves; there seem to be very few species on green
foliage, Precise habitat information is, however,
available for only a small proportion of the material.
The species which may be associated with green
foliage are Caceilius seenifuscatus (Tillyard), Stenep-
socus siriatifrons (if it is a Stenapsocus) and Cladio-
neura punctata sp. n. although even these cannot be
confirmed as inhabitants of fresh leaves, It seems
unlikely that the main method of collecting, by
beating, would give samples biassed toward bark
dwellers as opposed to inhabitants of green Icaves.
The fauna as so far known seems, therefore, to be
poor in inhabitants of green leaves,
Echinopsocus grayi sp. 0., Pachyiractes rugesus
sp. mn. and Sphaeropsecepsis recens (Hickman) are
leaf litter insects. chmepteryx (Loexophelia)
brunnea Smithers is an inhabitant of twigs and
smaller branches. The two species of Tragiidae,
Cerobasis guestfalica (Kolbe) and Lepinotus reti-
culatus and also Psyllipsocus ramburii are very
widespread domestic species which have all been
taken in outdoor habitats, the last two being known
also from caves. Lachesilla pedicularia (L.) has
been recorded from several parts of the world, In
Europe it is an inhabitant of trees and shrubs and is
often found in homes, The only South Australian
record is fram packing straw from England. The
two species of Ectopsocidae, Ectopsecus californicus
(Banks) and E, cetrdtus Smithers, are inhabitants of
dried leaves cither on plants of as leaf litter as are
Pentacladus eucalypti Enderlcin and Propsocus pal-
lipes. Mesopsocus reticulatus sp. n. is the first species
of the family to be recorded from Australia, Several
454
members of this family in Africa occur in fairly dry
habitats on the twigs of shrubs and the European
species are found on bark of branches and twigs.
The most important tamily of bark dwelling psocids
is the Psocidae. The family is well represented in
South Australia, comprising about 30% of the
psocoptcran fauna so far known. The two myop-
socids, Phlotodes australis and Ph. hickmani
(Smithers), feed on algae and fungi on bark; the
former is very common on damp suburban paling
fences,
Until the fauna of the whole of the continent is
hetter known only tentative comments can be made
ou the relationships of the South Australian fauna
as a whole although a few elements can be clearly
discerned. There is a worldwide clement, repre-
sented by such species as Cerobasiy guestfalica,
Lepinolus reticulatus and Psyllipsecus ramburii
which have probably established themselves inde-
pendently of human influence, although they are also
found in domestic situations, Ecropsocus californicus
and Lachesilla pedicularia are similarly very wide-
spread species weli able to establish themselves in
new areas. There is an element composed of Aus-
(ralasian species, such as Caecilius semifuscalus,
Peripsocus maoricus (Tillyard), Propsocus pallipes,
Pentacladus eucalypti, Phlotodes australis and the
philotarsids, which are widespread in coastal regions
of Australia and which, in some cases, have ranges
which include New Zealand and Norfolk Island. To
what extent there has been human influence in the
overseas distributions is not known but such species
as Ph, australis could easily be carried on timber,
Together with these species can be included those
which have a more restricted southern and eastern
Australian distribution such as Echmepieryx brunnea
Smithers, Peripsocus edwardsi New, P. hickmani
New, Spilopsocus ruidis Smithers and Tanystigma
tardipes (Edwards). There appear to be two other
elements occurring in South Australia one of which
has affinities with Western Australia, including
species such as. Lasiopsocus michaelseni Enderlein
and Ectopsecus cetratus, While the other has aflini-
ties in an easterly direction with Victoria and Tas-
mania, represented by such species as Phlotodes
hickmani, Spilopsocus masseyi New and members of
the Blasle macrops species group, Finally, there is
the interesting species Sphaeropsocopsis recens
which js known from Tasmania and South Aus-
iralia and Which appears to have close relatives only
in South America, Angola and in Ballic amber
Mesepsocus reticulatus is an anomalous specics in
that the genus is known from many parts of the
world but. has not yet beea mentioned in records
for other parts of Australia. Its occurrence in South
Australia places it in an unusual, isolated position
zoogeographically,
REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18 (20); 453-491.
Muy, 1084
TAXONOMIC ACCOUNT OF SOUTH
AUSTRALIAN PSOCOPTERA
Smithers (1970, p, 372 er seq.) has given a key
to the families of Australian Psocoptera. In that
key the Mesopsocidae (not previously recorded
from Australia) would run to couplet 6. As it has
glabrous wings Mesopseeus will run to the Psilopso-
cidae, a family not yet recorded for South Australia,
Mesopsocus differs from psilopsocids in having 4 tall
areola postica and clear, hyaline wings; the psilop-
socids have a shallow areola postica and darkly
patterned wings.
LIST OF SPECIES OF PSOCOPTERA KNOWN FROM
SOUTH AUSTRALIA
(* New records for South Australia, ** South Australian
species not represented in present material),
LEPIDOPSOCIDAE
Echtnopsocus grayi sp. 1.
“Eehmepteryx (Loxopholia) brunnea Smithers
TROGHDAB
*Cerobasis yuestfulica (Kolbe)
**Lepinoias reticuluias Bnderlein
PSYLLIPSOCIDAE
**Psyllipsocus ramburii Selys-Longchamps
PACHYTROCTIDAE
Pachytroctes rugosus sp. 1,
SPHAEROPSOCIDAE
*Sphucropsocopsis recens (Hickman)
CAECILITDAE
*Caveilius semifascatus (Tillyard)
STENOPSOCIDAE
*"Stenapsocus. siriatifrans (McLachlan)
LACHESILLIDAE
*Lachesilla pedicntaria (1...)
ECTOPSOCIDAER
*Ecrepsocus californicus (Banks)
*Eeltopsocus cetratus Smithers
PERIPSOCIDAE
* Peripsocus edwardsi New
*Peripsocus maoricius (Tillyard)
*Peripsacus hickmani New
Peripsocus norialis sp. ti.
Peripsacus hollowayi sp, 1
PSEUDOCAECILIIDAE
Cladionewra punctata sp. n.
ELIPSOCIDAE
*Pentacladus cucalypri Enderlein
Propsocus pallipes (McLachlan)
*Spilopsocus masseyt New
*Spilopsocas reidis Smithers
PHILOTARSIDAE
#4 d4ustropsecks situasus (Banks)
*Haplophallus guitaluy (Tillyard)
Haplophallus hundaorensis New
Huplophallus medialis Thornton and New
*Haplophallus sinus Thornton and New
*“Aaronicla rawlings! Smithers
PSCOPTERA OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
MESOPSOCIDAE
Mesopsocus reticulatus sp. n,
PSOCIDAE
*Lasiapsocus michaelsenit Enderlein
Lasiopsocus dicellis sp, 1.
Blaste macrops sp. n.
laste magnifica sp. a.
Blaste angusta sp. n.
*Prycla umbrara New
‘Pryeta glossepicra New
Prycta longipenniy sp, 0
Prycta hollowayae sp. ni.
*Yanystigma. tardipes (Edwards)
Tanystigma elongata sp, n,
Tanystigma bifureata sp. nt.
Psocidus mouldsi sp. n,
Psacidus parilla sp. n.
MYOPSOCIDAE
Phiotodes australis (Brauer)
*Phlotades hickmani (Smithers)
KEY TO ADULT PSOCOPTERA FROM SOUTH
i
2(1)
3 (1)
5 (2)
6 (2)
AUSTRALIA
Antennae with more than 20 segments, never
secondarily annulated. Tarsi 3-segmented. Plera-
stigma not thickened, or absent. Paraprocts with
strong posterior spine ..,...... 2a
Antennae usually with 13 Begmenits, if 15- to “47-
segmented then some segments are secondarily
annulated. Tarsi 2- or 3-segmented, Pterostigma
thickened or not. Paraprocts without posterior
BOM G: Siti. — copes res rrerimden stain america ee
Antennae 12- to 17-segmented, some secondarily
annulated. Tarsi 3-segmented, Pieromlems not
thickened _.....,.,, a]
Antennie usually [3-seemented. ‘Parsi 2 or 3-
segmented, if latter then flagellar segments not
secondarily annulated, Pterostigma thickened ,, 6
Head long and yertical, Maxillary palp without
sensillumm on inner side of second segment. Cuz
and IA end together at wing margin (i.e,
nodulus present) (Psyllipsocidae) bf see
a . Psyllipsocus perma biirie
Head short. Maxillary palp with sensillum on inner
side of second segment. Cus and IA end
separately at wing margin (Le, no nodulus),, 4
Claws with preapical tooth. Body and wings bear-
ing scales (Lepidopsocidae) _.. . . .,,,,..., 18
Claws without preapical tooth. Body and wings
not scaly (Trogiidae) 2.0. 19
Wings, when present, flat, with complete venation,
In apterous and alate forms eyes situated near
vertex (Pachytroctidae) .... Pachytroctes rugasus
Wings, when present, with incomplete venation,
curved, elytriform. Fyes situated well below
vertex a alia aaa :
Sphaeraptacagsis ¢ recens
Labial palps broadly triangular, laterally diverg-
ing. Lacinia narrow towards apex, Female gona-
pophyses reduced to a pair of inconspicuous,
acuminate valves, with a basal seta... __ 7
Labial palps short and appressed, somewhuat
circolar. Lacinin not usually narrowed towards
7 (4)
8 (6)
9 (8)
10 (9)
11 (10)
12 (9)
13 (12)
14 (13)
15 (8)
16 (15)
17 (12)
18 (4)
19 (4)
455
apex. Female gonapophyses usually of three
valves, the external Valve setose; if reduced then
not in form of two acuminate valves ......... 8
Cui, fused with M, or joined to it by a cross-
vein (Stenopsocidae) — Stenapsacus striatifrons
Cen not fused gor joined to M (Caeciliidac) , -
nna Caecilius semifuseatus
Areola postica free or absent. Females sometimes
brachypterous or apterous but withoul glandular
setae on head , rit 9
Cu, fused wits M in : fully “winged ‘fortns.
Females occasionally brachypterous, but then
glandular setae are present — -.,,,.,.,,. 15
Tarsi 3-segmented 0004002022. .---, 10
Tarai 2-segmented viccecccccccccrercreercrercecres ve TD
Fore and hind wings withott setae (Mesopsocidae )
restgst Mesopsocus. reticulatus
Fore. and ‘hind wines with. at least a few marginal
setae, even in brachypterous forms; usually with
DBVIPUG MOLE 1) ears T BIE LUN seoauh sere BY
Hind wing with margin entirely setose, Male hyp-
andrium strongly sclerotized. Female subgenital
plate with median lobe (Philotarsidae) .... 20
Hind wing with at most setae on margin between
Reis and Ry45, Brachyptery common, Male
hypandrium lightly sclerotized. Female sub-
genital plate usually bilobed (Elipsocidae) __ 24
Areola postica absent
Areola postica present 0.0. jecceecereee EB
Wings without setae (Lachesillidae) a
ne Henne Lachesilla pedicularla
Wings STORES ec ps a iettiidenselinaesatanienseapanceenscittice LG
Distal parts of veins in fore wing wilh more than
one row of setae (Pseudocaeciliidae) .
WES Alea fda le tdabld a lan ol Cladioneura punctata
Distal ‘parts of veins in fore wing with one row
of setae (Elipsocidae) . 24
Tarsi 2-segmented (Psocidae) ... ..__.,, 27
Tarsi S-segmemted 2... ccc cscs ceererenrens 16
Fore wings without setae. Wing pattern of
numerous, confluent, irregular dark areas giving
wing a densely mottled appearance (Myo-
psocidac) . 7 coronene
Wing pattern. bold, made up of large ‘hyaline and
coloured areas or without pattern (Elipsocidae)
. 24
Hind wing with Rs and M fused for a length,
Ry) meets margin al acute angle pF pelpepeetne
: . 44
Hind v wing with Rs aid M foined by a crossvein.
R; meets margin at right angle or almost so
(Ectopsocidae) cece Oe AB
Fore wing with Rs branched. Hind wing developed
vad , Echmepteryx hrunnea
Fore wing Swe Rs Sirtipte:. ‘Hind wing reduced to
small, pomted, flap ............ Echinapsecus grayi
Fore wings reduced but present as broad flaps
Tyan: Lepinotus reticulatus
Fore. inet r victaalty absent, represented by a
small tubercle . . Cerabasis guestfalica
aS6
20 (11)
21 (20)
22 (20)
23 (22)
24 (16)
25 (24)
26 (24)
28 (27)
29 (28)
40 (29)
31 (30)
32 (31)
#3 (30)
REC. 8. AUST, MUS. 18 (20):
Setae of fore wing veins sited on distinct dark
brown spots, at least in basal half of wing;
flagellar segments 6-8 with light apices ,...,.. 21
Setae of fore wing veins not sited on dark brown
spats, sind segments 6-8 without light apices
In fore wing Cuy bare, setae of upical veins sited
on distinct brown spots —- Aaroniella rawlingsi
In fore wing Cup setose, setae of apical veins not
sited on brown spots Haplaphalius medialis
In tore wing Cus selose or wing very reduced.
Antennal apex aitenuated, with a single, long
sel sites fa: 23
In fore wing Cus ‘Hare. Avitennal apex ‘not ‘allen-
uated, not with a single long seta
_ Haplophallus sinus
Femora and tibiae largely dark chocolate brown:
female brachypterous ,..........
Haplophullus. bandaorantis
Femora, and tibiae light brown; female macro-
plérous or brachypterous Haplophallus guttatus
Areola postica fused with M or joined to it by a
crossvein . |i conrenneranrvecoecoeyen@nrecionneen
Areola postica tres 26
M with more than 3 branches
i a . Pentacladus Nacktuer
M with 3 branches _ Prapsacus pallipes
Areola postica with Cy, curved to give a convex
distal margin to cell. Hypandrium simple, with-
out postero-lateral Johes , Spilopsecus muasseyi
Arcola postica with Cuy, sinuous to give a concave
distal margin to cell. Hypandrium with rounded
postero-lateral lohes - . Spilopsocus ruidis
Fore Wing veins obviously setose .......... .
Lasiopsocus michaelseni
Fore. wing veins without or apparenily without
SCTE coy amernrtinr meen ses, eycieris co. 2B
Fore wing with overall sheng pattern...
: Blaste magnifica
Fore wing hyaline | or + patterned, in Which case
patiern is not speckled ay ae. eae)
Cell My narrow. Mg and Cony parallel -
Blaste angusta
Cell. My 1 not markedly narrow. My and C09 not
parallel a“ :
Pterostigma with spurvein ..., . — ... — 3h
Pterostigma without spurvein ........000.-... 33
Cells Ry and R5 strongly and extensively pig-
mented . . . Tanystigma elongata
Cells Rg and Rg not strongly and extensively pig
FORTE” Wi acwer siliuiluddt delle suet cene aa
Distinct pigmented area near margin only in cell
Ri invcnnenee. LTanystigma bifurcata 2
No distinct inthented area near margin in cell
Ri . Tanystigma lardipes
Fore wing hyaline except for pigmented area at
margin in cell Ry or also over whole of cell Ry
basad of hind angle of plerostigma renee) 34
Wing markings otherwise ....00...000.0, 0... 35
34 (33)
35 (33)
36 (35)
37 (36)
38 (36)
39 (38)
40 (39)
41 (40)
42 (40)
43 (42)
44 (17)
45 (44)
46 (45)
47 (16)
48 (17)
453-491, Muy, 1984
Pigmented area near margin and over whole of
eell Ry basad of hind angle of pterostigma ....-
. Prycta hollowayae &
Pismerited 2 area ve: ‘cell Ri only near margin
Tunystiema bifurcata §
DUCE COORD DOR OUe Brit erie
Psocidus moulds?
Median cells strongly pigmented
Median ‘ells nol - strontly plemented . .. 36
Area around nodulus not pigmented ,,,..,,,,, 37
Acea around nodulus pigmented .....,.. ., 38
Phullosome cGpen posteriorly
. Lastionvavins idicetles ri
Phallosome closed posteriorly
. Ptyeta hollawayde 3
Cell Ry strongly pigmented beyond hind angle
of pterostigma —. . Psocidus parilla
Cell R, pot so pigmented . 39
Cell Rs;
postica .. |... .
Cell R5 without sucty § a Spot
with pigment spot anterior to areola
Prycta glossoptera
40
No spot at separation of M and Cuz .... ! 41
Spot of colour at separation of M and Cuz 42
No dark areas in basal cells ....
Some dark areas in basal cells ...
Piyeia langipennis
Ptycta umbrata
Spot at separation of M and Cuy almost snr
Cuy Hh. _ 43
Spot at separation of M and Cu ‘apnall,,
$a trodmxooweocka ¢posocotta cackpott Blaste rmderops
Area around Rs and M junction pigmented ..,
Apa rsfostekacertcctentrimiac tite Lasiapsocus dicellus &
Area around Rs and M junction hyaline ...,,..,
Piycta hallawayae 2
Fore wings grey With hyaline areas, visible even in
brachypterous females Peripsacus edwardsi
Fore wing without such markings 45
Fore Wing with Rs, M basad of fusion with Rs
and nodulus narrowly bordered with brown
. Peripsocus hiekmant
Fore. wines without such markings 46
Epicranial plates pale, bordered with pale brown
. Peripsocus maaricus
Epicranial ‘plates “pale. with a few brown marks
adjacent to compound eyes, across vertex and
adjacent to median epicranial suture .......,
Pia etisiecoroccottchtehnc aro to Peripsocus notialis
Epicranial plates very dark brown, a narrow pale
stripe from epistomial suture towards back of
head on each siilorttat L plate Tats es
_ Peripsocus hoflewayt
Larger apres fore wing Jength 5.0-5.5 mm
va . Phlotodes australis
Smaller species, fort wing 2 Tensth 3.4-3.6 mm __
_ Phlotodes hiekmani
Vertex pale brown, postclypeus much darker ,,,,,..,
. Ectapsocus californicus
Vertex pale with “darker spots, postclypeal ground
colour not much darker than vertex, postclyp-
eus with dark stripes .,..... Ectopsoens cetratus
PSCOPTERA OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
Family LEPIDOPSOCIDAE
Echinopsocus grayi sp. n.
Female
Coloration (in alcohol): Head, body, legs,
antennae and maxillary palps golden brown. A faint
suggestion of a darker, curved narrow line mesad of
each compound eyc, a darker median epicranial
suture, a median line running length of pronotum
and mesoscutum and with margins of mesoscutum
dark. Apex of abdomen darker than head and
thorax. Ocelli black, Eyes black, Fore wing trans-
parent, tinged with golden brown; ves 4 little
darker than rest of wing surface; when vicwed with
transmitted light a somewhat mottled appearance is
evident with very faint indication of broad, trans-
verse, irregular banding. Hind wing transparent,
colourless.
Morphology; Brachyptcrous. Most of scales lost
in available material, those present long and very
narrow, Somewhat thickened fore wings not reaching
apex of abdomen, Abdominal terga membranous
under fore wings (i.e. as far as tetgite 7); eighth and
ninth tergites and terminal structures well sclero-
tized. Length of body: 2.5 mm. Median epicranial
suture and anterior arms very distinct. Vertex sharp.
Head with long, dense pubescence, Postclypeus
bulbous, Antennae incomplete in all specimens;
scape and pedicel broad, remaining segments short,
about twice as long as wide. Eyes fairly large,
Pao oes rt oace 2 “7
+57
reaching level of vertex, with an occasional seta
between facets. IO/D:2.0; PO:;0.7, Ocelli well-
developed, anterior ocellus only a little smaller than
lateral ocelli, Lacinia narrow, parallel-sided with an
emarginate apex so that the end is divided into a
smaller inner tooth and a larger outer tooth, Maxil-
lary palp with elongate second segment with small
sensillum; fourth segment a little broadened distally.
Prothorax sharp dorsally, strongly pubescent,
Measurements of hind leg: F: 0.72 mm; T: 1.16
mm: ty: 0.43 mm; te: 0.11 mm; ty: 0.1L mmy rt:
4:1:1. Hind femur short and broad, dorsal edge
convex with large setae, Tibia Jong and narrow,
apex with two stout and one small spur, Claws with
preapical tooth but without evident denticles basad
of tooth. Fore wing length: 1,96 mm; width: 0.72
mm, Fore wing (Fig, 1) not reaching apex of
abdomen, narrowing towards apex; membrane some-
what thickened, Anterior margin somewhat
thickened, Distal section of Sc (ie. from stigma-
pophysis to marginal thickening) distinct. R, runs
parallel to wing margin for a long length, reaching
margin not far short of wing apex. Rs fused with
M for a short length just distad of stigamapophysis,
simple, not branched, M 2-branched, the anterior
branch, apparently M, is, in fact, Rs. Cu, forks at.
level of stigmapophysis so that the areola postica
is long. Veins not well developed but evident, indi-
cated by position of rows of long, erect setae, repre-
sented by alveolae in figure. Membrane densely
FIGS, 1-6. Echinopsocus grayi sp. n, 1, 2 Fore wing. 2, 9 Hind wing (same scale as fore wing). 3. 9 Hind wing (enlarged)
4. 9 Epiproet and paraproct. 5. Gonapophyses. 6. ¢? Paraproct.
$34
covered with scales and scale-like setac, most of
which ate lost in available specimens, Hind wing
length; 0.44 mm, width: 0.12 mm. Hind wing (Figs,
2, 3) reduced to a membranous, acuminate flap
with faint suggestion of one vein near anterior
border and another, even less distinct, running more
or less parallel with the hind margin. A. single
small seta occurs about half-way along hind margin,
Epiproct (Fig, 4). Paraproct (Fig, 4), Subgenital
plate simple, rounded behind, Gonapophyses (Fig,
5). Ninth tergite and median part of eighth tergite
more heavily sclerotized than other abdominal terga,
being the areas exposed through wing reduction.
Male
Coloration (in alcohol): As female.
Morphology, General morphology as female,
similarly brachypterous, Byes as in female, Length al
hind leg: F: 0.64 mm; T: 1.04 mm; t: 0.39 mm;
ty: 0.08 mm}; ty: 0.08 mm; rt) 4.9:1:1. Fore wing
length: 1,68 mm; width: 0.68 mm, Form and vena-
tion as in female, Hind wing as in feniale, Hypan-
drium well sclerotized, with gently rounded hind
margin, a group of strong setae in middle of hind
margin, Phallosome with external parameres pos-
teriorly strongly acuminate, their apices strongly
incurved. Epiproct simple, rounded behind, Para-
proct (Fig, 6).
Material Exantined‘ SOUTH AUSTRALIA. ? (holo-
type), & (allotype), in litter, Mambray Creek, 19 iv.
1973, M. Gray. Paratypes: 2 %, as holotype,
Holotype, allotype and paratypes in the Australian
Museum.
Discussion; Echinopsecus Enderlein was erected
on ihe basis of a single specimen, in poor condition,
of E, erinaceus Enderlein from New Guinea (Ender-
Icin 1903), No additional material of this genus has
become available until now, E. gravi has most of the
generic characters of E. erinacezs but differs in the
fore wings not haying a long apical extension
although they are somewhat pointed. Enderlein
(1903, p. 331) indicated that he was unable to
find ocelli in E. erinaceus but they are present in
E. grayi. The venation of Echinopsocys is quite
distinctive, however, and E. vrayi agrees with the
type species. R, is long; Rs is not branched, uppear-
ing to arise from M owing to the evanescence of the
basal section of that vein busad of its fusion with M;
M is 2-branched, the anterior branch reaching the
margin near the bluntly pointed wing apex. Although
most of the setae and scales have been lost from the
four available specimens, those which remain and
the arrangement of alveolac indicate that FE. perayi
is clothed in scales through which protrude a fairly
dense covering of strong, erect setae, as described for
REC, S. AUST. MUS. 18 (20): 453-491.
Alay, 198d
&. crinaveus. The immediately apparent dillerence
between F, erayi and ©. erinaceus is the difference
in wing shape. the apical extension being consider-
able in £, erinaceus whereas the apex is. bluntly
pointed in £. gray).
Although &. grayi does not. conform to the charac-
ters of the generic definition so tar as occlli and fore
wing shape are concerned it ig not considered
necessary fo erect a separale genus for it. EL suffices
to enlarge the limits of Lehinepsecus to include
species which do have ocelli and in which the wing
Shape is more nearly normal,
Echmepteryx (Loxophalia) brannea Smithers
Echmepleryx (Laxopholia) hrunnea Smithers 1965.
J. ent, Sve, Od. 4: 75, Figs. 11-16,
Material Examined: SOUTH AUSTRALIA. 1 3,
Yalata, 131°45°E, 31°30'S, 29,i%.1978, M.S. and
B. J, Moulds. 1 9, 40 km. W. Nullarbor, 130°29°E,
31°28'S, 29,i%,1978, M.S. and B, J. Moulds.
This species has been recorded [rom New South
Wales and Queensland,
Family TROGITIDAE
Cerobasis guestfalica (Kolbe)
Hyperetes euestfalicus Kalbe, 1880, Jber. wesi/.
Prover, Wiss, Kunst &: 132; pl, IV, fig. 22.
Hyperetes pinicala Kolbe, 1881, Ent, Nachr, 7:
Tichohia aliernans Kolbe, 1882. Ent, Nachr, &: 21:
1
ww
tw
~~
2)
ti
tw
Ww
Cerobasis muraria Kolbe, 1882, Ent, Nachr, 8:
Ayperetes tessulatus Hagen, 1883. Stetitn. eat. Zig.
44; 216,
Alhardia alternans (Kolbe). Jacobson and Bianchi,
1904, Neyropt. Russ. Enip. p. 496.
Cerébasts guesifalica (Kolbe),
Sretiin. ent. Ztg. (04: 13.
Material Examined: SOUTH AUSTRALIA, 5 2,
Port Elliot, 13.v.1980, G. and J. Holloway,
C, guesialice is a cosmopolitan species which is
found in domestic habitats as well as in the wild.
Roesler, 1943.
Lepinotus reticulatus Enderlein
!Clothilla inguilina (Heyden). Hagen, 1882. Siettin.
ent, Zre. 43: 526, Pl. I, Fig. 6.
!Atrapos inguilina (Heyden), Kolbe, 1888. Jb) Fer.
Naturk. Zwickau 1887: 190, 191.
Lepinetus reticulatus Enderlein, 1905, Res, Swed.
Exp. Egypt 18: 31, Fig. 9; Pl. 1, Figs 1, 2; Pl. 2,
Figs, 12, 19, 23,
Not represented in the present material, this
species has been recorded from caves in South
Australia (Smithers, 1972).
PSCOPTERA OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
Family PSYLLIPSOCIDAE
Psyllipsocus ramburii Selys—Longchamps
Psecus pédicularius Rambur, 1842. Historie natu-
relle des Insectes, p. 323.
Psyllipsocus ramburii Selys-Longchamps, 1872. Ent.
mon. Mag. 9: 145.
Nymphopsocus destructor Enderlein, 1903. Zool.
Anz. 27: 76.
Ocelloria gravinympha Weber, 1906, N.Y. Med, J.
$4: 885, Fig. 1.
Nymphepsocus traglodyta Enderlein, 1909. Arch.
Zool. exp. gen. 5 (1): 536, Pl. 18, Figs 9-11,
13, 14.
Fita vestigator Nayas, 1913, Rev. Acad. Madrid 12:
333, Fig. 4.
Fabrella convexa Lacroix, 1915, Bull. Soc. ent. Fr.
1915: 194,
Not represented in the present material, this
species has been recorded from South Australian
caves (Smithers, 1972).
459
Family PACHYTROCTIDAE
Pachytroctes rugosus sp. n.
Female
Coloration (in alcohol): Head, thoracic nota,
legs, first two abdominal terga, a lateral patch on
each side of third abdominal tergum and eighth
tergum dark brown. Ninth tergum and epiproct pale
brown; paraprocts dark brown. Other abdominal
terga very lightly sclerotized but segments are indi-
cated by broken bands of subcutaneous brown pig-
ment, Antennae brown, a little paler than head. Eyes
black.
Morphology: Apterous. Median epicranial suture
extending about one third distance towards epi-
stomial suture; anterior arms represented by a line
of tiny papillae visible only in cleared specimen.
Hind border of head straight between eyes. Sculp-
turation of vertex consisting of short, raised bars in
haphazard arrangement, that of the postclypeus
similar but finer, Lengths of antennal segments: f,:
0.12 mm; f.: 0.12 mm. First three flagellar segments
without annulations; antennae annulated from fourth
FIGS. 7-10. Pachytroctes rugosuy sp. n. 7. Gonapophyses. 8. Subgenital plate. 9, 9 Paraproct. 10. 2 Lacinia.
460
segment. Eyes fairly small, their upper margin lying
Jevel with vertex. Small tubercles present between
facets. Ocelli absent, Lacinia (Fig, 10) apparently
with five apical teeth, the fifth not clearly separated.
Fourth segment of maxillary palp elongate, four
times as long as wide. Thoracic terga of approxi-
mately equal width and length, clearly delineated,
finely sculptured with small, pointed spicules
arranged in irregular transverse rows, Dorsally, the
first, second, eighth and ninth ierga heavily sclero-
tized, remaining terga lightly sclerotized, almost
membranous, except for a small irregular area near
the lateral margin on segment three, Second segment
laterally sclerotized. Eighth segment much shorter
than ninth, the latter being more than twice as long
as eighth and much narrower opposite epiproct than
adjacent to eighth tergite. Sculpturation as in
thoracic terga but absent froni median area in
anterior half of second abdominal segment; spicules
jess densely arranged on ninth tergite, especially in
middle of plate, Femora of pro- and mesothoracic
legs strongly broadened with long setae. Hind
femora only slightly broadened, Measurements of
hind leg: F; 0,38 mm; T: 0.49 mm; t,: 0.24 mm;
ty: 0,08 mm; ty: 0.07 mms rt: 4.8:1:1.4. Epiproct
(Fig, 9) finely papillate except for a narrow pos-
terior area; setose, Paraproct (Fig. 9), setose, papil-
fae in dorsal half only, Subgenital plate (Fig, 8)
very large, setose and papillate, the papillae arranged
roughly in transverse rows. Gonapophyses (Fig, 7).
Material Examined) SOUTH AUSTRALIA. ¢
(holotype), ex dry sclerophyll Ewucalyptas litter,
Melrose, Flinders Ranges, 16.iv.1973. M. R. Gray.
Paratypes; 2 9, as holotypes. Holotypes and para-
types in the Australian Museum.
Discussion: Pachytroctes rugosus differs from
P. achrosta Thornton and Woo (from the Galapa-
g0s) in lacking postclypeal striations and pale
thoracic terga. The gonapophyses are similar in
Shape but the external valve of P. rugosus lacks a
sensillum. It differs from P. tapinelloides Badonnel
(from Africa) in having the fourth and fifth antennal
segments annulated, P. australis Ribaga, P, dichram-
moscelis Badoonel and P, granulosus Badonnel (all
African) differ in having the sculpturation of the
vertex in the form of fine granulations, not bar-
shaped ridges. In P. bicoloripes Badonnel (African),
P. insularis Thornton and Woo (Marianas) and
P. nivecinctus Badonnel (African) the metathorax is
white, In P, aglypha Badonnel (African) the sculp-
turation of the head is indistinct and, as in P. auran-
tiacus Badonne] (African) and P. ambiguus Badon-
nel (African) there are no granulations between the
ommatidia.
The only previous record of this genus from Aus-
tralia is that of an unidentified species taken from
bags of peanuts in shell at Kingaroy, Queensland,
REC, §. AUST. MUS, 18 (20); 453-491.
May, TUs4
Family SPHAEROPSOCIDAE
Sphaeropsocopsis recens (Hickman)
Sphaeropsocus recens Hickman, 1934. Oce. Pap: R.
See, Tusm. 1933: 83, Figs. 4A-4F,
Sphaeropsocopsis recens (Hickman). Badonnel,
1963. Biol. l'Amerique australe 2: 291, 323.
Material Examined: SOUTH AUSTRALIA, 1 2,
ex Eucalyptus litter, dry sclerophyli, Melrose, Flin-
ders Ranges, 16.iv-1973, M. R. Gray. 1 2, Mt. Lofty,
26.iv.1943, H. Womersley,
This small interesting species was described from
dry grass tussocks in Tasmania (Hickman 1934),
The genus is known also from Chile and Angola.
The closely related genus SpAaeropsocus Hagen is
known from one species in Baltic amber.
Family CAECILITDAE
Caecilius semifuscatus (Tillyard)
Maoripsocus semifuscatus Tillyard, 1923. Trans.
NZ, Inst, 54; 191, Fig. 16; Pl. 18, Fig. 11.
Caecilius semifuscatus (Tillyard). Senithers, 1969.
Rec. Canterbury Mus, 8: 280, Figs, 44-48.
Material Examined; SOUTH AUSTRALIA. 20 ¢,
23 9, Wirrulla, ESE Ceduna, 28-ix.1978, M. S. and
B, I. Moulds. 1 c', 1 °, 50 km WNW Ceduna, 28.ix.
1978, M, S. and B. J. Moulds, 12 2, Pooginook
Park, 13-16.vi.1979, G. A, Holloway. 1 2, 20 km
SE Pt. Augusta, Horrock’s Pass, Flinders Ranges,
17,vi.1979, G. A. Holloway. 2 %, 15 km N Port
Broughton, 7,v.1980, G. and J, Holloway. 1 %, 10
km N Goolwa, 13.v,1980, G, and J, Holloway. 1 3,
18 km N Ardrossan, 8.v.1980, G. and J. Holloway.
] 3, Telowie Gorge, 10 km E Port Germein, 20.v.
1981, G,, J. and A. Holloway.
This species, originally described from New
Zealand, has also been recorded from Curtis Island,
Bass Strait. These records are the first from the
Australian mainland.
Family STENOPSOCIDAE
Steropsocus striatifrons (McLachlan)
Psecus striatifrons McLachlan, 1866, Trans. ent,
Sec, Lond, (3) 5: 351.
Slenepsecus striatifrans (McLachlan). McLachlan,
1866, Trans, ent, Soc, Lond. (3) S: 352.
This species was described from “Australia meri-
dionali” and is not represented in the present
material, The original locality may not have been in
South Australia and nothing referable to this species
has since been reported in the literature,
PSCOPTERA OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA 461
Family LACHESILLIDAE
Lachesilla pedicularia {L,)}
Hemervbius pedicularius Linnaeus, 1758. Systema
Naturae p, 551,
Lachesilla pedicularia (L.). Enderlein, 1919. Cat.
Coll, Selys Longchamps 3 (2); 16,
For complete synonymy see Smithers (1967)-
Material Examined; SOUTH AUSTRALIA, 1 8,
in packing straw from England, Adelaide, y.1937,
L, pédicularia is a very widespread species being
known from the Palearctic Region, Comoros, Argen-
tina and South Marianas. There ig one previous
Australian record, from Victoria.
Family ECTOPSOCIDAE
Ectopsocus californicus (Banks)
Peripsocus californicus Banks, 1903. J. N.¥. ent,
Soc, 11: 237,
Ectopsecus californicus (Banks) Badonnel, 1955.
Pub, culi. Camp. Diam, Angola 26: 185.
Ectopsocus congener Tillyard, Smithers, 1969. Rec.
Canterbury Mus. & (4): 289, Figs. 71-75.
Material Examined: SOUTH AUSTRALIA. 1 8,
9 km S$ Edithburgh, 7.v.1980, G, and J, Holloway,
1 os, 2 9, Mt, Alma, 12 km SW Victor Harbor,
12.v.1980, G, and J. Holloway, 1 3, 4 km N
Murray Bridge, 22.v.1981, G. and A. Holloway.
This species is known from North America, New
Zealand and Antipodes Islands; previous Australian
records are from Tasmania and New South Wales,
Ectopsocus cetratus Smithers
Ectopsecus. cetratus Smithers, 1972, Aust, Zool, 17
(1): 15, Figs, 1-8.
Material Examined: SOUTH AUSTRALIA. 7 34,
36 9, 3 km EK Nundroo, 132°30'E, 31°50'S, 29.1x.
1978, M.S. and B. J. Moulds, 5 ?, Wilmington,
Flinders Ranges, 6.v,1980, G, A, Holloway. 2 &,
50 km WNW Ceduna, 28.ix.1978, M. S. and B. J.
Moulds, 3 3, 10 9, 40 km E Nullarbor, 131°15B,
31°25'S, 29.ix.1978, M. S. and B. J. Moulds, 2 &,
Yalata, 131°45°E, 31°30'S, 29,ix,1978, M. 8. and
B. J. Moulds,
This species was described from Western Aus-
tralia; these are the only subsequent records for the
species.
Family PERIFSOCIDAE
Peripsocus edwardst New
Peripsocus edwardst New, 1973, J. Aust. ent, Soe.
12: 40, Figs. 1-6.
Material Examined: SOUTH AUSTRALIA, 3 4,
1 2, 20 km. SE Port Augusta, Horrock’s Pass, Flin-
ders Ranges, 17.vi1979, G. A. Holloway. 3 4,
Germein Gorge, Flinders Ranges, 11,5 km E Pt,
Germein, 7.vi,1979, G. A. Holloway. 2 ¢&, 2 &,
Germein Gorge, 19.v.1981, G. and J. Holloway.
This species, in Which the females are brachyp-
terous, has previously been recorded only fram
Victoria.
Peripsocus maoricus (Tillyard)
Peripsocopsis maoricus Tillyard, 1923, Trans, N.Z,
Inst. 54: 194, Fig. 18; Pl. 18, Fig, 12.
Peripsocus macropterus. Edwards, 1950, Pap, R, See,
Tasm. 1949; 124, Figs. 89-94.
Perjpsacus maoricus (Tillyard). Thornton and
Wong, 1968. Pacific Ins, Monoer, 19; 10, 135.
Material Examined: SOUTH AUSTRALIA, 30 4,
23 ?, 6 km W Kapunda, 18,vi,1979, G. A. Hollo-
way. 20, 6 ?, 5 n, 9 km § Edithburgh, 7-v.1980,
G. and J. Holloway. 7 3, 17 9, 2 n, Spring Gully
Park, 9 km SSW Clare. 18.vi.1979, G. A. Hollo-
way, 1 9, Pooginook Park, 15.vi.1979, G. A. Hollo-
way. 3 3, Germein Pass, Flinders Ranges, 6,v,1980,
G, and J. Holloway, 17 3, 17 9, Germein Gorge,
Flinders Range, 11,5 km E Pt, Germein, 7.vi,1979,
G. A. Holloway. 1 ¢, Wirrulla, ESE Ceduna, 28.ix.
1978, M. S. and B. J. Moulds, 21 o, 55 %, 23 n,
25 km E Peake, 23.vi,1979, G. A. Holloway, 19
3, 21 2, 1 n, 23 km E Tailem Bend, 13.v-1980,
G. and A, Holloway, 12 ¢, 24 %, 15 km W Tailem
Bend, 13.v.1980, G. and A. Holloway. 9 dy, 19 2
2 km E Parilla, 23.vi,1979, G. A, Holloway. 11 ¢,
72,3 n, 4 km E Pinnaroo, 14,v.1980, G. and J,
Holloway, 2 4, 2 9, 4 km S, Moonta, 7.v.1980, G,
and J, Holloway, 2 d, 1 8, 18 km N Ardrossan,
8.v.1980, G. and J. Holloway. 1 3, 6%, 9 n, 10 km
N Goolwa, 13.y.1980, G. and J. Holloway, 6 ¥, 20 9,
41 n, 16 km 8 Minlaton, 7.v.1980, G, and J, Hollo-
way, 2d, 13 %, Adelaide, 224x.1965, H. Womersley.
8 3,102, 7 4, 12 km SE Port Wakefield, 8.v,1980,
G. and J. Holloway, 4 6, 2 ?, 19 n, 2 km W Wil-
liamstown, 8,v.1980, G. and J, Holloway. 3 ot, cx
Cypress Pine, Alligator Gorge Rd., near Mt, Re
markable, Flinders Ranges, 17.iv.1979, G. Hollo-
way. 3 2, W end of Horrack's Pass, 19.v,1981, G,
and J. Holloway. 10 3, 17 &, ex Casuarina, Mt,
Gambier, 23,v.1981, G,, J. and A. Holloway. 30 3,
55 2, Germein Gorge, 19-20,v.1981, G. and J, Hol-
loway. 6 4, 10 %, Burra Gorge, 20 km SSE Burra,
21.v.1981, G., J. and A. Holloway, 1 ¢, 2 km SE
Williamstown, 22.v.1981, G. and A, Holloway, 1 &,
Telawie Gorge, 10 km E Pt. Germein, 20.v.1981,
G,. and J. Holloway-
462 REC. S$. AUST, MUS. 18 (20); 453-491, May, 1984
Peripsocus maoricus appears to be widely dis- Peripsocus notialis sp. n.
tributed, at least through the southern part of the Male
continent and Tasmania, It has been recorded from
Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia and now Coloration (in alcohol): Head pale brownish
from South Australia. Tt was originally described cream with pale brown markings. A few brown
from New Zealand. marks close against upper margin of compound eyes
FIGS. 11-16, Peripsocus notialis sp. n. 11. ¢ Fore wing. 12. Phallosome. 13. Subgenital plate, 14, 2 Fore wing. 15, 2
Paraproct. 16. Gonapophyses,
PSCOPTERA OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
and across vertex with broken patch on either side
of median epictanial suture near back of head, Post-
clypeus with anteriorly converging, pale browu
stripes nol reaching anteclypeus, Genae and labrum
as head. Antennae and muxillary palps brownish.
Eyes black. Ocella¢t tubercle brownish, Lobes of
mesothoracic notum pale brown; parapsidal sutures
paler than lobes. Legs pale brownish cream with
slightly darker tarsi, Fore wing (Fig. 11) hyaline,
uniformly very lightly tinged with pale brown; ptcro-
stigma opaque but noi darker than rest of membrane,
Hind wing, membrane us fore wing. Veins brown, all
well developed, none evaneseent, Abdomen pale;
phallusome sclerifications indistinctly visible through
hypandrium.
Morphology: Median epicranial suture distinct;
anterior arms evanescent. Antennae much thicker
than in female. Lengths of flagellar segments: f;-
0,68 mins fu: 0.48 mm, Eyes large; reaching well
above level of vertex, Faccts exceptionally large: eye
emurginate where almost in contact with antenna
base. 10/D: 0.80; PO: 1.0. Ocelli large, on well
developed tubervle. Lacinia yery narrow near distal
end, hardly divided apically. Fourth segment of
maxillary palp long, parallel sided with rounded
apex, four times long as wide. Measurements of
hind leg: F: 0.60 mm; T: 1.16 mm, ty: 0.32 mm;
ty: O16 mm; rt: 2:1; et: 22, 0. Legs long and
narrow. Fore wing (Fig. 11) with fairly broad costal
cell, Cu, evanescent just before margin, Fore wing
length: 4,0 mm} width: 1.6 nim, Hind wing length:
3.0 mm; width: 1.1 mm. Epiproct triangular with
angles rounded, sctose, sparsely spiculate in median
area near base; spicules very small. No clumal camb,
Paraproct simple, ovoid, with very large circular
trichobothrial field, the setae long and fine. Hypan-
drium simple, with a broad sclerotized band parallel
with hind margin; margin interrupted. in middle:
svlose. Phallosome (Fig. 12) closed anteriorly with
distinctly sclerotized margin interrupted posterjarly-
Sclerification of penial bulb heavy. of two, pos-
teriorly outwardly curving sclerites subtended by a
complex sect of symmetrically arranged selerites.
Female
Coluration (in alcohol): As male but marks on
head 4 little more extensive, Fore wings (Fig. 14)
as in male but costal cell, anterior half of cell R
and anterior pact of cell Ry as far as apex of ptero-
stigma hyaline, contrasting with the very pale
browish linge in rest of membrane. Hind wing
hyaline, faintly tinged with pale brawn along veins.
Terminal abdominal structures brown,
a
Morphology, Length of body: 2.5 mm, Lengths
of flagellar segments: f,: 0.40 mm; f: 0.26 mm,
a4
Antennae nyuch finer than in males. Eyes fairly small,
much smaller than in males. 1O/D; 1-7; PO: 0,75.
Measurements of hind leg: F: 0.52 mm; T: 0.96
mm; ty: 0.20 mms t.: 0.16 mits rts 1.3:15 cts 8, 0,
Fore Wing length; 2.8 mm; width: 1.1 mm, Fore
wing (Fig. 14). Hind winy Jenyth: 2.2 mm) with:
0.8 mm. Epiproct (Fig. 15), Paraproct (Fig. 15)
simple, with small trichobothrial field, the setae long
und fine, Subgenital plate (Fig. 13). Gonapophyses
(Fig. 16).
Material Examined; SOUTH AUSTRALIA, 2
(holotype), ? (allotype), ex cypress pine, Alligator
Gorge Rd., near Mt. Remarkable, Flinders Range,
17.vi.1979, G. A, Holloway. Paratypes: 5 ¢, 19 9,
as holotype (one $ on slide). Other material: 5
nymphs, as holotype.
Holotype, allotype and paratypes in the Australian
Museum.
Discussion: Peripsoeus netialis is a species which
is somewhat sexually dimorphic, The female has the
anterior part of the wing hyaline in contrast to the
uniformly coloured wing of the male, The female
wings are considerably shorter than in the large nvale
and the legs are stouter, with fewer ctenidia not
regular in arrangement. In general arrangement the
sclerifications of the penial bulb resemble these in P-
norfolkensiy Smithers. & Thornton and P. suaoricts
(Tillyard) but differ in proportion and shape. The
female differs in 1O/D ratio and in wing colour.
Proportions of the gonapophyses also differ but they
resemble evch other in having a broad ventral valve.
Peripseeus. notialis is similar in size to P. edwards?
New but differs in having much paler wings, Ti P.
edwardsi the wing membrane is faintly tinged with
grey but there are discrete hyaline patches im most
cells, In P, notialis the male fare wing membratie is
very faintly but uniformly tinged with pale brown.
In the female the costal cell and a narrow strip
behind R and R, is hyaline. The female is some-
what brachypterous. There are slight differences in
proportions of the ponapaphyses and, although
simulac jn general structure, the male phallosome has
differently proportioned sclerificatiang of the penial
bulb, In P. hamiltonae Smithers, a slightly smaller
species, there isa distinet darkening across. the. wing
from stigmapophysis to nodulus, which is not present
in P. nofialiy. P. hickman’ New is a much smaller
species. than P. netialis with a fore wing Jength of
less than 3 mm as Opposed ta that of 4 mm. for
P, notiglis, In P. hyekmanj{ there is a little pigmen-
tation adjacent to the basal section of Rs and M
basad of fusion with Rs which is absent from P-.
notielis, The phullosome in P. votialis hits a trans-
verse anterior boarder with complex seclerification of
the penial bulb and narrow, outwardly curved
external purdmeres, In P, hiekmani the phallosame
464
tapers to a broken, narrow anterior end and the
external parameres are broad and short; the scleri-
fications of the penial bulb are simpler, being in the
form of a few longitudinal rods and a rngosely
sclerotized bulbous area, P. paoricus has a distinc-
tive three lobed apex to the arch formed by the dis-
tally fused inner paracneres and the wing is uni-
formly more darkly tinted than in P. notialis. P.
notialis is much larger than P, melaleucae New. The
female of P, melaleucae has tapering lateral exten-
sions of the sclerotized area of the subgenital
plate; these areas are broad in P, nojialis. The
phallosome of P. smelaleucae has short, broad,
external parameres, In P, muller’ (Tillyard), P.
morulops (Tillyard) and P. tillyardi New the wings
are much darker in general with cyen darker areas
along some of the wing veins, In P. roseus Smithers
the pterostigma is distinctively reddish in the distal
half in life (this color fades in alcohol). The main
veins have dark and light sections which give a
distinctive appearance of being broken and discon-
linuous.
Peripsocus hollowayi sp, n.
Male
Coloration (in alcohol); Head very dark brown
except for a paler area between ocellar tubercle and
antenna base, narrowing laterally to proximity of
17
REC, 8. AUST. MUS. 18 (20): 453-491,
May, 1984
compound eye and epistomial suture and a similar
pale narrow stripe from this area towards back of
head on each epicranial plate. Postelypeal stripes
hardly discernible (might be more easily seen on
paler specimens?). Labrum coloured as head.
Antennae dark brown, Maxillary palps dark brawn.
Eyes black. Ocellar tubercle very dark brown, Meso-
thoracic: notum very dark brown, lacking pale
median stripe: lateral lobes each with a narrow paler
mark running from scutellum to lateral margin near
wing base: a pale spot where. parapsidal sutures con-
verge, Coxae dark brown. Legs pale brown, Fore
and hind wings hyaline with dark brown veins.
Abdomen pale, terminal structures very dark brown,
the Jarge, broad phallosome clearly visible through
paler integument of abdomen.
Morphology; Median epicranial suture very dis-
tinct, as. is epistomjal suture, Length of flagellar
segments: fy: 0.56 mm; f.: 0.40 mm. Eyes only
moderately large, small for a male. IO/D: 1.7; PO:
0.88. Lateral ocelli large, anterior ocellus much
smaller. Measurements of hind leg: F; 0.62 mm) T;
1.28 mm; t: 0.28 mm; t.: 0.14 mm; rt: 2:1; ct:
15. 0. Fore wing length: 3.3 mm; width: 1.2 mm.
Hind wing length: 2.5 mm; width: 0.8 mm- Ptero-
stigma fairly shallow, hind angle not pronounced,
shallowly rounded. Epiproct (Fig. 19) heavily
BIGS, 17-20, Peripsocus hollowayi sp. o. 17, Padlloout., 18. Hypandrium, 19, 3° Epiproct. 20. Peripsacus hickmant
allosome.
PSOCOPTERA OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
sclerotized, with semicircular hind margin very
strongly sclerotized and a small posterior median
membranous extension with rounded hind margin.
Paraproct well sclerotized with large, circular tri-
chobothrial field. Hypandrium (Fig. 18) (damaged
in preparation) with median emargination, lighily
sclerotized except for a broad, well-sclerotized
medially interrupted band paralJcl with hind margin.
Phallosome (Fig. 17) well sclerotized, broad,
rounded anteriorly; external parameres broad; inter-
nal parameres distally fused, ending in a pair of
blunt processes, Sclerifications of penial bulb heavy,
symmetrically arranged.
Material Examined: SOUTH AUSTRALIA, 1 ¢
(holotype), ex cypress pinc, Alligator Gorge Rd.,
near Mt. Remarkable, Flinders Ranges, 17.v1.1979,
G, A. Holloway, Paratype; 1 3, Germein Gorge,
Flinders Ranges, 11.5 km B Pt. Germein, 7.vi.1979,
G. A. Holloway.
Holotype and paratype in the Australian Museum.
Discussion; Peripsocus fellowayi is a large
species with dark head and thorax and hyaline wiags.
The broad phallosome, with broad, external para-
meres and two short posterior processes with
heavily sclerotized penial bulb sclerifications is
characteristic and distinguishes it from all ather
species.
Peripsocus hickmani New
Peripsoous hickmani New, 1973. J. Aust. ent. Sac.
12: 341, Figs 5, 7-10.
When this species was described from Victoria
(New 1973. p, 341. Figs 5, 7-10) male material
was not available, The males in the present material
permit description of that sex here.
Male
Coloration (in alcohol): As female (New 1973,
p. 341).
Morphology: Length of body: 2.2 mm. Median
epicrania] suture very clearly defined, Lengths of
flagellar segments: f;: 0.40 mm; £: 0.30 mm.
Antennae shorter than in female. Eyes fairly large,
larger than in female but anly just reaching level of
vertex. IO/D: 1.2; PO: 0,81. Measurements of hind
leg: F: 0.44 mm; T: 0.92 mm; t,: 0.20 mm; te:
0.12 mm; rt; 1.7;1; ct: 16, 0, Fore wings as in
female (New 1973, Fig. 7). Fore wing length: 2.8
mm, width: 1.1 mm. Hypandrium simply rounded
behind, not medially emarginate, a broad, lightly
sclerotized band parallel with margin, shghtly inter-
rupted in midline. Phallosome (Fig. 20) similar ta
that of P. tillyardi New (1973, Fig, 12) but broader;
sclerificatians of penial bulb symmetrical.
A465
Material Exainined: SOUTH AUSTRALIA, 1 3,
1%, Walata, 131°45°E, 31°30'S, 20.ix.1978, M. S-
and B. J. Moulds, 3 2,6 9,18 km WN Ardrossan,
8,v.1980, G. and J. Holloway.
Discussion; The male phallosome of P. hickmani
resembles that of P. sillyardi in general form but
differs in being wider in relation to length and in
having the external parameres almost as wide as
long, whereas in P. tillyardi they are more elongate,
distinctly longer than wide,
Family PSEUDOCAECILIIDAE
Cladioneura punctata sp. n.
Female
Coloration (in alcohol): Head ivory, with very
faint suggestion of median brown band from vertex
to labrum and very pale greyish patch mesad of each
compound eye, Median epicranial suture not
obviously coloured. Antenmac pale brown, a small
section at the distal end of each flagellar segment
paler, Eyes black, Ocellar tubercle very dark brown,
conspicuous against otherwise pale head, Labrum
brown, Maxillary palps pale, tip of fourth segment
very dark brown. Mesonotum with dark brown ante-
dorsam und lateral lobes; parapsidal sutures pale,
Metanotum with Jateral lobes brown, Pleura mainly
brawn. Coxae brown basally, pale distally. Femora
pale, without dark bands. Tibijae pale. Tarsi brown.
Claws black. Fore wings (Fig, 21) hyaline with
dark brown markings. Hind wings hyaline with a
faint infuscation adjacent to basal section of Rs and
M between separation from Cu, and fusion with Rs.
Abdomen pale with a few spots on each segment;
the dorsum of the ninth tergitc, in particular, has
an irregular row of darker, larger spots which are
conspicuous. Epiproct and paraprocts are pale.
Morphology; Length of body: 2.5 mm. Median
epicranial suture distinct, anterior arms less con-
spicuous, Head, except anteclypeus and genac, with
strongly developed erect setae, those on postclypeus
shorter and finer than most of those on vertex,
Lacinia (Fig, 25). Length of flagellar segments: f;:
0.40 mm; f.; 0.28 mm, Eyes fairly small, not reach-
ing level of vertex, [1O/D: 2.9; PO: 0.7. Ocelli large,
anterior ocellus about as large as lateral ocelli.
Measurements of hind leg: F; 0.52 mm; T: 0.96
mm; ty: 0.28 mm; tg; 0.14 mm; rt; 2:1. Cteni-
diobothria absent. Fore wing length; 2.3 mm} width:
0.9 mm, Fore wing (Fig. 21) with veins evanescent
in many places; strong setae arise in two rows mostly
alongside rather than on veins, Cus without setae,
Hind wing length: 1.8 mm; width: 0.7 mm. Veins
sparsely setose only in distal part of wing (Fig. 22).
Epiproct almost semicircular with small setae on
posterior half and a series of strong setae along
REC. $, AUST. MUS. 18 (20): 453-491,
~~ ™~ %
Ea Sw eg phat we Ey
<a Se _ PEW AR, 5
May, Las
bee
te Ne
FIGS, 21-25, Cladioneura punctata sp. n. 21, % Fore sai te ? Hind wing, 23, Gonapophyses. 24, Subgenital plate.
. acinia.
posterior part of margin. Paraproct simply rounded
behind, setose in posterior half with strong posterior
marginal setae. Trichobothrial field of about 9
trichobotliria, poorly defined. Subgenital plate (Fig.
24) posteriorly bilobed, each lobe with a few strong
marginal setae, variable in number (holotype with
four on right lobe and two on left). Gonapophyses
(Fig. 23).
Male
Unknown,
Material Examined! SOUTH AUSTRALIA, &
(holotype), 15 km N Ardrossan, 8.v.1980, G. and
J, Holloway. Paratypes; 2 9, as holotype. 1 ?, 16 km
§ Minlaton, 7.v.1980, G, and J. Holloway.
Holotype and paratypes in the Australian
Museum,
Discussion: Cladioneura punctata differs from
C, pulchripennis Enderlein in details of wing pat-
tern, fore wing development and shape of the tip of
the lacinia. In C. punetata the most conspicuous
wing colour difference is the absence of pigment over
most of cell My adjacent to the areola postica and
the presence of a spot in cell Rs at the basal
quarter. The wings in C. punctata are relatively
short and broad being only 2.3 mm long for a
body size of 2,5 mm, whereas in C. pulchripennis
the fore wings approach 3.0 mm for the same body
size. The lacinia is broader at the apex in C. punc-
fata, The gonapophyses are similar but differ a
little in proportions. In C. puxetata the marginal
setae of the subgenital plate are in two groups
whereas in C. pulchripennis the four setae are more
evenly spaced across the hind margin, C, pulchri-
pennis is the only other species in the genus.
Family ELIPSOCIDAEK
Pentacladus eucalypti Enderlein
Pentacladus eucalypti Enderlein, 1906, Zool. Jh, 23:
408; Pl. 23, Fig. 7.
Material Examined; SOUTH AUSTRALIA, 2 ¢,
Ravine des Casoars, Kangaroo Is., 28.x.1951, G. F,
Gross,
This species has been recorded from New South
Wales, Tasmania, Victoria and Queensland.
PSCOPTERA OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
Propsocus. pallipes (McLachlan)
Psocus pallipes McLachlan, 1866. Trans. ent. Soc.
3 ser. 5: 349.
Propsocus pallipes (Mclachlan).
1866. Trans. ent. Sec, 3 ser, 5; 352,
Tricladuy froggatti Enderlein, 1906. Zool. Jb. 23:
410; Pl. 23, Fig. 6,
Tricladellus freggatti (Enderlein), Enderlein, 1909.
Srertin. ent. Zte. 70: 273,
MeLachlan,
Material Examined: SOUTH AUSTRALIA, 1 3,
15 km SW Tailem Bend, 13.v.1980. G. and A.
Holloway,
Originally described from Adelaide, this specics
is known from New South Wales, Tasmania, Queens-
Jand and Western Australia. It has not yet been
recorded from Victoria but it seems likely that it
will be found there,
Spilopsocus masseyi New
Spilopsocus masseyi New 1971. J. Aust. ent. Soc.
10: 226, Figs, 7-13,
Material Examined: SOUTH AUSTRALIA, 1 32,
Port Elliot, 13.v.1980, G, and J, Holloway, t 3,
Seal Bay, Kangaroo Island, 2-4.xii.1977, D. K.
McAlpine and M, A, Schneider, 1 2, 40 km W,
Nullarbor, 130°29'E, 31°28'S, 29.ix.1978, M. S. and
B. J. Moulds.
This species is recorded from Tasmania, New
South Wales and Victoria,
Spilopsocus ruidis Smithers
Spilopsocus ruidis Smithers, 1963, Pacific Ins. 5 (4):
894, Figs. 19-25,
Material Examined: SOUTH AUSTRALIA. 1 32,
Yalata, 131°45'E, 31°30'S, 29.ix.1978, M. S. and
B. J. Moulds.
Spilopsocus ruidis has previously been recorded
only from New South Wales.
Family PHILOTARSIDAE
Austropsocus sinuosus (Banks)
Zelandapsocus sinuosus Banks, 1939. Bull. Mus.
comp. Zool. Hary. 85: 441, Pig. 12,
Austropsocus sinuosus (Banks). Thornton and New,
1977. Aust. J. Zool. Suppl. ser, 54: 28, Figs. 99-
104.
This species was originally described from South
Australia (Mt. Lofty Range) but is not represented
in the present material.
467
Haplophallus guttatus (Tillyard)
Philotarsus guttatus Tillyard, 1923. Trans. N.Z.
Inst, 54: 181, Fig. 8.
Philotarsopsis deleaius Tillyard, 1923. Trans. N.Z.
Inst. 54: 182, Fig. 9.
Philotarsus greyi Edwards, 1950, Pap. R. Soe. Tasm.
1949: 116, Figs. 68-75,
Haplophallus greyi (Edwards).
J. ent. Sac, Od, 2: 60.
Smithers, 1963.
Haplophallus guttatus (Tillyard). Smithers, 1969.
Rec. Canterbury Mus, 8: 322, Figs. 158-162.
Material Examined: SOUTH AUSTRALIA, 1 ¢,
15 9, 40 km E Nullarbor, 131°15°E, 31°25'S, 29,
ix.1978, M, S. and B. J. Moulds. 1 ¢, 7 ?, 3 km
E Nundroo, 132°30'E, 31°50'S, 29.ix.1978, M, S.
and B. J. Moulds. 1 ¢, 1 2, Myponga, H, M, Hale.
Haplophallus gutiatus has been recorded from
many localities in New South Wales, Victoria, Wes-
tern Australia and Tasmania. It is also known from
Queensland and was originally described from New
Zealand,
Haplophallus bundoorensis New
Faplophallus bundoorensis New, 1971, J, Aust, ent.
Soe. 10 (1): 25, Figs. 1-10.
FHlaplophallus capitulatus Smithers, 1972, Aust. Zool.
17 (1): 19, Figs, 12-17,
Material Examined: SOUTH AUSTRALIA, 9 32,
5 3, 6 km W Kapunda, 18.vi.1979, J, Holloway.
2 3, 50 km WNW Ceduna, 28.iv.1978, M. 8. and
B. J. Moulds,
H, bundoorensis is known from Victoria, Queens-
land and South Australia.
Haplophallus medialis Thornton and New
Haplophallus medialis Thornton and New, 1977.
Aust. J, Zool. Suppl. ser., 54: 13, Figs, 26-32,
36.
Material Examined: SOUTH AUSTRALIA, 7
specimens ex Eucalyptus obliqua dry sclerophyll
forest, Naracoorte Cave Reserve, 25.x.1958, G. F.
Gross,
This specics was previously recorded from New
South Wales, A.C.T., Victoria and South Australia.
Haplophallus sinus Thornton and New
Haplophallus sinus Thornton and New, 1977. Aust.
J. Zool. Suppl. ser. 54: 20, Figs. 60-68.
Material Examined: SOUTH AUSTRALTA, 1 @,
Mt. Alma, 12 km SW Victor Harbor, 12.v.1980,
468
G. and J. Holloway. 1 3, 10 km N Goolwa, 13.y.
1980, G. and J. Holloway. 3 &, 1 9, ex Casuarina,
Mt. Gambier, 23.v.1981, G., J. and A. Holloway.
1 3, Yourambulla Caves, 6 km SW Hawker, 18.v.
1981, G. and J. Holloway.
H. sinus is known previously from only one New
South Wales locality.
Aaroniella rawlingsi Smithers
Aaroniella rawlingsi Smithers, 1969. Rec. Canter-
bury Mus, 8: 324, Figs. 163-168.
Aaroniella pallida New, 1971. J. Aust. ent. Soc. 10
(1): 29, Figs 11-21.
Material Examined: SOUTH AUSTRALIA. 1 4,
Mt. Gambier. 23.v.1981, G., J. and A. Holloway.
Originally described from New Zealand _ this
species has been recorded from Victoria, New South
Wales, Australian Capital Territory and Western
Australia.
REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18 (20): 453-491,
May, 1984
Family MESOPSOCIDAE
Mesopsocus reticulatus sp. n.
Male
Coloration (in alcohol): Head brown, very
slightly darker on either side of median epicranial
suture and dorsad of compound eyes, lacking the
discrete spotting usual in the genus. Median epi-
cranial suture dark brown. Postclypeus brown, ante-
clypeus pale. Labrum and genae brown. Antennae
brown. Eyes black, Ocellar tubercle a little darker
than surrounding area. Maxillary palps with all four
segments brown. Mesonotum brown, parapsidal
sutures pale brown. Pleura brown, a reddish mark
laterally on hind part of mesopostnotum. Legs
brown. Fore wings (Fig. 26) hyaline, veins and
pterostigma brown. Abdomen pale, terminal struc-
tures brown,
Morphology: Length of body: 2.2 mm. Median
epicranial suture distinct, anterior arms absent.
FIGS. 26-29. Mesopsocus reticulatus sp. n. 26. ¢ fore wing, 27. 6 Epiproct and paraproct. 28, Phallosome. 29. Hypan-
rium.
PSCOPTERA OF SGUTH AUSTRALIA
Head small, finely pubescent: vertex arched, Seulp-
turation of head on vertex and frons consistitig of a
well defined polygonal pattern of raised ridges, that
on pastclypeus of a serics of irregular, fine, trans-
verse ridges, Postclypeus not exceptionally bulbous
but reflexed anteriorly so that the anteclypeus is
somewhat set back, Posterodistal row of sensilla on
anterior margin of Jabrum made wp of three placoid
sensilla and two trichoid sensilla almost in a straight
line, Anterodistal row of four sensilla, Lengths of
flagellar segments (in mm,.)> f,: 0.39; f.: 0.23;
fy> O21; fy: 0.19; fp: 0.14; far 0.14; fy: 0.12;
Fg: 0,10; fy: 0.09; fy 9! 0.08; fia: 0.08, Antennae
fairly short, tip mucronate. Total tength: 1.81 mm.
Eyes fairly Jarge, somewhat protruding but not
reaching level of vertex, [10/D: 2.0; PO, 0.86, Ocelli
large. Pedice] with two conical sensilla; first flagellar
segment with one sensillum with minute point at
basal quarter, Fourth and tenth flagellar segments
each with a similar sensillum at distal end. Sixth
flagellar segment apparently lacks a sensillum. Legs
slender, Measurements of hind Jeg: F: 0.47 mm;
T: 1.00 m; + 1-19 mm; te: 0.07 mm; tg: 0.08 mm;
rt: 2,7:151.1; ct: 10, 0, 0. Fore wing length: 3.5
tm; width; 1,25 mm. Fore wings (Fig. 26) with
long, narrow pterostigma, Ry geatly curving, Rs
before junction with M slightly curved; fusion with
M fairly short. Radial fork about as Jong as stem.
Cu,, slightly curved before rounded apex of areola
postica so that basal side of areola postica is slightly
concave. Hind wing length: 2.6 mm; width: 0.
mm, Cuy and TA not strongly curved near wing
margin, Four minute setae on margin between
Ro+, and Ry, 5, readily visible only at magnifica-
tion greater than about 50%. Epiproct (Fig. 27).
Paraproct (Fig: 27). Hypandrium (Fig. 29). Phallo-
some (Fig, 28) narrowing anteriorly and posteriorly
with bluntly pointed anterior end to phallic frame.
Penial bulb with strong, symmetrical sclerifications.
Acdeagal arch narrow, slightly angled distally.
External parameres broad apically, with conspicuous
extension but obliqucly truncate distally,
Material Examined: SOUTH AUSTRALIA, ¢
(holotype), Germein Gorge, Flinders Range, 11.5
km E. Pt. Germein, 17,vi,1979, G. A. Holloway.
Holotype in the Australian Museum,
Discussions Mesapsecus reticulatus is. the first
species of the family to be reported from Australia;
the genus has previously been recorded fram Africa,
Europe, Asia and North and South America,
Most species have a distinctive and striking head
pattern made up of spots and stripes on the vertex
and have the more or less clearly defined postcly-
peal stripes so characteristic of many psocopterans.
Mesopsocus reliculatus obviously differs at first sight
in lacking. this patterning, The head is almost uni-
449
formly brown, The antennae are unusually short
and the truncate form of the apex of the external
parameres and the clearly defined, symmetrical
sclerificattons af the peniwl bulb differ in those
species in Which these structures have been described,
Unfortunately only one specimen, a male, is
available; it is possible that the female, as in many
other species of Mesepsocus, is apterous.
Family PSOCIDAE
Lasiopsocus michaelseni Enderiein
Lasjapsocus michaelsent Enderlein, 1907. Fauna
SW, Aust. (1) 3: 234, Figs 1-5.
Blaste (Lasiopsocys) michaelseni (Enderlein).
Roesler, 1943. Srettin, ent, Zig, 104! 3,
Material Examined: SOUTH AUSTRALIA. 2 @,
3 nymphs, Pooginook Cons. Park, 15.vi,1979, G. A.
Holloway, 1 ¢, 2 km & Parilla, 23.vi.1979, G. A
Holloway. 4 d, 5 9, 5 nymphs, 4 km E Pinnaroo,
14.y,1980, G. A, and J. Holloway, 2 ¢, 5 $, Pan-
dappa Res,, 20 km E Terowie, 16.v.1979, G. A.
Hollaway-
L. michaelseni is one of the largest Australian
psocids with a wing length of up to about 7 mm.
It was. originally described from Western Australia.
The record from New South Wales (Muogamarra
Nature Reserve) (Smithers 1977) is in errar and
the specimen referred to there belangs to L, simu-
latus Smithers,
Three of the females. from Pandappa Reserve are
brachypterous, the wings reaching only to the end of
the abdomen, Enderlein (1907) gives wing lengths
of 7.0 mm (2) and 4.7 mm (?), With the shorten-
ing of the wings venational aberration has occurred
to the extent that the fusion of Rs and M in the fore
wing is shortened so that these veins meet in a point
or are even joined by a crossvem, A similar reduc-
tion in the length of fusion occurs of Cu,, and M to
the point that these veins do not meet at all so the
aerola postica ts free and the discoidal cell open.
Lasiopsocus dicellus sp. n,
Male
Coloration (in alcohol); Head pale, but brown
as follows: a double row of irregular confluent spots
adjacent ta each compound cye, across back of
vertex and on either side of median epicranial suture;
a broad spot on frons ynterior to ocelli; a line in
position of anterior arms of epicranial suture from
ocelli ta antenna base; a ming around antenna base;
a mark below compound eye on gena; postclypeal
stripes and the labrum, Median postclypeal stripes
closer and darker than lateral stripes. Ocellar tubercle
black, Scape and pedicel brown; flagellum very
470 REC, 8. AUST. MUS. 18 (20): 453-491 May, 1984
FIGS, 30-38, Lasiopsocus dicellus sp. 1. 30, d Fore wing. 31. 2 Fore wing. 32, Phallosome. 33. Hypandrium. 34. Sub-
genital plate. 35. Ninth tergite, poslero ventral apophysis, 36, ¢ Epiproct, 37. Gonapophyses, 38. @ Ninth sternite.
PSCOPTERA OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
dack brown, Eyes black, First and second maxillary
paip segments pale, third brown, fourth dark brown,
Dorsum of mesolborax dark, shiny brown, a little
paler where parapsidal sutures meet. Fore Iegs pale
brown except for darker apex of tibia and tarsal seg-
ments. Meso- and meta-thoracic legs similar bot coxae
dark brown, Fore wings (Fig. 30) hyaline, without
extensive pattern: pterostigma brown; veins dark
brown, Hind wings hyaline; veins brown. Abdomen
pale, terminal structures very dark brown.
Morphology: Length of body; 4 mm. Median epi-
cranial suture distinct; anterior arms not evident but
usual position indicated by brown line. Antennae
fine, bearing Jong setae, those of first flagellar seg-
ment up to more than five times longer than width of
segment. Eyes fairly large, not reaching Jevel of
vertex, 1O/D: 1,9; PO: 0,83, Ocelli large. Apex of
lacinia divided into two slightly denticulate Jobes,
the outer strongly divergent; Jacinia narrowed just
basad of apical division. Measurements of hind leg:
F; 1.04 mm} T; 2,04 mm; t,; 0,60 mm; tu> 0,20
mmm; rt: 3:1; ets 22, 2, Fore wing length: 5-0 mm;
width; 1.6 mm. Pterostigma long, narrow, Stigma-
pophysis shallow, dome-shaped. M before fusion
with Cu;, curved to give a cancave outer margin, to
discoidal cell; curved section of vein somewhat
evanescent as are Reys and R4}5 beyond separa-
tion. TA fairly thick. An occasional tiny seta present
on Veins. Hind wing length: 3.7 mm; width: 1.1.
Hind wing margin with a few fine, shert setae
between Roja and Ry, 5 near wing apex. Epiproct
(Fig. 36) sclerotized with a sinuous hind margin.
A complex basal structure arises from epiproct
where it is attached to ninth tergite. This consists of
a posteriorly directed plate which lics above epiproct,
the plate is posteriorly bilobed and strengthened
along each side by a sclerotized strip, the strips
curving away somewhat from each other behind,
From the base of the plate arise two erect, elongate,
apically 3-lobed strap-like apophyses (twisted in
illustration) which are more heavily sclerotized
dorsally than ventrally, Paraprocts wilh very
strong, median sclerotized strengthening bar, a large,
almost circular trichobothrial field distad of which
the paraproct ts extended inta 2 media-dorsally
directed tapering bar subtended by a ventrally
placed, lightly sclerotized lobe. These lobes are
curved inwards and lie behind the distal part of ihe
hypandrium. The eighth sternite sclerotized in distal
part Only, adjacent to base of hypandrium. Hypan-
drium (Fig, 36) distally upturned to end in a broad
lobe with transverse posterior margin. Ninth tergite
extended posteroventrally on each side into a distally
broadened lobe with a heavily sclerotized margin.
The broadened end is acute dorsally but broadly
rounded ventrally (Fig. 35). Phallosome (Fig. 32)
ATL
with external parameres joined anteriorly, narrow,
rodlike, diverging posteriorly, each with a pair ol
strongly developed, outwardly curved distal teeth,
Near the end of each paramere arises a small pro-
jection, probably representing the temnants of the
internal patameres,
Female
Coloration (in alecghol)- As in male but with
parapsidal sutures pale, legs darker and with dis-
linct wing pattern in various shades of brown (Fig.
31), This ts in strong contrast to the hyaline male
fore wing,
Morphology: Length of body: 5.2 mm. Eyes small.
10/D: 2.7; PO: 0.84. Lacinia as in male, Measure-
ments of hind leg: F> 1.2 mm; T: 2.1 mm; t,: 0.5
mm; ty: 0.25 mmy rt: 2:1; ct: 21, 2. Fore wing
length: 5.0 nm; width; 1.6 mm, R_ strongly
developed. Rs and M fused for a shart length. Dis-
coidal cell as in male, Hind wing lensth: 3.8 mm;
width: 1.2 mm, Marginal setae as in male but a little
more strongly developed. Paraproct broadbased,
narrower posteriorly, well sclerotized with simall
circular trichobothrial ficld. Subgenital plate (Fig.
34). Gonapophyses (Fig: 37) with finely pointed
ventral valve, dorsal valye blunt-ended, spiculate
near end. Sclerification of ninth sternite (Fig, 38)
simple, ring-like.
Material Examined: SQUTH AUSTRALIA. 1 ¢
(holotype), | 2? (allotype), Pandappa Res., 20 km,
BE. Terowie, 16,vi.1979. G, A. Holloway. Paratypes:
12 &. 6 %, data as holotype; 2 3, 1 2%, 4 km NW
Murray Bridge, 22.v.1981, G., J. and A. Holloway.
Holotype, allotype snd paratypes in the Aus-
tralian Museum,
Discussion; Lasiopsocus dicellus differs from L.
michaelseni in being much smaller and darker, with
a fore wing length of only 5.0 mm compared with
7.0 mm for L. michaelseni. The wing sctae are re-
duced to an occasional small seta, not easily seen.
The proportions of the complex structures associated
with the male epiproct are different although the dis-
tinctive structures are similar m general form and
arrangement. The phallosome differs in proportions
of the parts. The eighth sternite of the male is
sclerotized only in a marrow band adjacent to the
base of the hypandrium and the sternite is thus much
Jess heavily and extensively sclerotized than in other
genera of the Amphigerontiinae, to which sub-
family Lasiopsocus. belongs,
The female of L. michaelseni, as well as being
much Jarger than that of DL. dicellus, does not have
the extensive dark wing markings characteristic of
L, dicellus,
Males of L. dicellus are very similar to those of
L. simulatus Smithers but differ slightly in propar-
472 REC. S, AUST. MUS. 18 (20): 453-491, May, 1984
FIGS. 39-45, Blaste macrops sp. n, 39. ¢ Fore wing. 40. Phallosome. 41, Hypandrium. 42. 9 Fore wing. 43. Subgenital
plate. 44, 2 Epiproct. 45. Gonapophyses.
PSCOPTERA OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
tions of the phallosome and the structures associated
wilh the epiproct. The pasterior lobe of the hypan-
drium hag a transverse hind margin in L. dicellis
but is more rounded in L. simularus, The female of
L. simulatus is not known.
Blaste macrops sp. n.
Male
Coloration Gn alcohol): Head pale with brown
Toarkings as follows: a wide band consisting of irre-
Bular, sometimes confluent spots adjacent to com-
pound eyes, across yertex and on either side of
median epicranial suture (these arcas leave only a
small part of epicranium clear); a broad band from
eye through antenna hase and across anterior part
of postclypeus to meet band from other side; from
the broad band, another runs from between eye and
antenna base towards the ocellar triangle, Posicly-
peus pale with rows of faint spots in positions usually
occupied by postclypeal stripes; spots darker in
anterior third. Labrum dark brown. Genae pale
with dark mark below eye. Antennae brown. Eyes.
black. Ocelli circled with black, Maxillary palps
progressively darker from pale base to dack brown
fourth segment. Meso-thoracic antedorsum dark
brown except for a small spot on each anterolateral
angle and one at junction of parapsidal furrows;
dorsal lobes dark brown, broadly pale adjacent to
parapsidal furrows and fore wing base; scutellum
pale. Metathorax with pale antedearsum and brown
dorsal lobes. Femora pale, itregularly marked. with
pale brown; tibiac pale proximally, becoming dark
brown distally; tarsi dark brown, Fore wings (Fig.
39) hyaline, marked in shades of brown. Hind wings
hyaline with a pale brown areca in distal angle of
Cu,, Abdomen pale, with irregular brown, seg-
mentally arranged markings; terminal structures
dark brown,
Morphology: Length of body; 2.8 mm. Median
epicranial suture distinct, anterior arms evanescent.
Upper region of head somewhat expanded to form
lobes on which the eyes are carried so that top of
head is broadened; vertex medially depressed.
Length of flagellar segments: f,: 0,85 mm; f.: 0.90
mm. Antennae slender with fine pubescence. Eyes
fairly large, very prominent, carried on upper lateral
head extensions, inner margins diverging strongly
behind when seen [rom above. TO/D: 2-1; PO:
0.90. Ocelh large, but ocellar tubercle not very
prominent, Measurements of hind leg: F: 0.83 mr;
T; 1.9 mm; ty: 0.6 mm; ty: O15 mm, rt: 4:15 et:
26, 4. Legs long and slender. Fore wing length: 4.5
mun; width: 1,7 mm. Se curves distally to meet R.
Rs and M fused for a length. Discoidal cell concave,
ic, M curved. M, curves, arched towards wing
margin, reaching margin just anterior to wing apex.
473
Hind wing length: 3.4 mim; width: 1.1 mm. Micro-
trichia of wing membrane a little larger in cell Cuo
than elsewhere. Epiproct rectangular with rounded
hind angles, Paraproct heavily sclerotized in basal
half, lightly so in distal half; trichobothrial field
large and circular, posterior projection small and
pointed. Hypandrium (Fig. 41). Phallosome (Fig.
40) with parameres apically separate and tapering,
divergent,
Female
Coloration (in alcohol): As. male but with a pale
median line on mesothoracic antedorsum and more
extensive fore wing markings (Fig, 42),
Morphology; Length of body: 3-7 tam, Head
much larger than i male, shaped as in male, eyes
unusually prominent for a female. Antennae fine.
10/D: 2.5; PO: 0.82. Measuremenis of hind leg:
F; 0.82 mm; T: 1,8 mm; t; 0.55 mm; te: 0.15
mm; rt: 3,6:1, Fore Wing length, 3.7 mm: width:
1.3 mm. Venation as in male but My, reaches wing
margin at wing apex. Hind wing length: 2.8 mm;
width: 0.9 mm. Epiproct (Fig. 44) heavily sclero-
tized laterally, less so medially with hind margin
slightly emarginate medially, Subgenital plate (Fig.
43) well sclerotized. Gonapaphyses (Fig, 45).
Material Examined: SQUTH AUSTRALIA, 1 ¢
(holotype), 1 % (allotype), 25 km E Peake, 23,vi.
1979, G, A. Holloway, Paratypes: 3 %, 1 ¢, Germein
Gorge, Flinders Ra., 11.5 km FE Pt. Germein, 17.vi.
1979, G. A. Holloway. 1 2, 2 km E Parilla, 23-1.
1979, G. A. Hollaway. 1 ¢, Pandappa Res.,. 20 kim
E Terowie, 6.¥i.1979, G, A, Holloway,
Holotype, allotype and paratypes in the Australian
Museum.
Discusston; Blaste macrops belongs to a group
of species in which the male hypandrium js rounded,
with a pair of lateral, incuryed, posteriorly project-
ing processes and a phallosame in which both inner
and outer parameres are elongate, joined anteriorly,
with the inner parameres free behind, tapering to-
wards end, The eyes if both sexes are prominently
placed on short dorsolateral extensions of the head
capsule and there is usually sexual dimorphism in
wing pattern with females having somewhat more
extensive and often darker markings than males,
The group includes &. fulcifer Smithers (Tasmania),
B_ furcilla New (Western Australia), B, luaulata
New (Western Australia) and B. tillyardi Smithers
(New Zealand, New South Wales and South Aus-
tralia). &. panaps Smithers (Tasmania) may alsa
be considered as belonging to this group although
wing pattern dimorphism is not pronounced and the
474
male hypandrium lacks the curved processes; the
phallosome, however, is very similar to that of B.
falcifer, as is the shape of the epiproct.
Only the most obvious differences between the
species are given here. Perusal of the descriptions
and illustrations will provide an indication of the
characteristic differences in proportions and shapes
of genitalic structures as well as wing pattern dif-
ferences by which the species can be distinguished.
REC. S. AUST. MUS, 18 (20): 453-491.
May, (984
Both B. falcifer and B. panops have a distinct
mark between the ends of Ry, and M, i.e. near
the wing apex which is lacking in B. macreps. In B.
lunulata males (females not known) there are exten-
sive wing markings in cell Cus; the band of colour
across the wing from pterostigma to areola postica
is broad and continuous; M, Rs -++- M and the edges
of the discoidal cell are bordered with brown and
the median cells and cell R; cach apically have
FIGS, 46-50, Blaste magnifica sp, n, 46, 3 Fore wing. 47. Hypandrium. 48, ¢ Epiproct, 49. ¢ Paraproct, 50. Phallo-
some.
PSCOPTERA OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
extensive brown markings, These markings are far
more extensive than in B. maecreps (Fig. 39). In B.
tillyardi, probably the nearest known relative to 2.
maecrops, the hypandrial processes are shorter and
stouler and the inner parameres posteriorly incurved.
In female B. macrops there are irregular marks in
cell R adjacent ta M which are absent from female
B. ftillyardi and B, fureilla, Males of B- fureilla
differ from males of B. muacrops in having a tri-
angular flap arising from the base of the epiproct
(New 1974, Fig. 17).
The generic Jimits of Blaste and its nearest rela-
tives are in meed of revision on a world basis and
when this is dane it seems likely that B. macrops
und similar species will be defined as a distinct
generic group,
Blaste magnifica sp, n.
Male
Coloration (in alcohol): Head brown with dark
brown markings. A double row of irregular, con-
fluent spots adjacent to compound eyes, across back
of vertex and adjacent to median epicranial suture.
Frons with triangular patch with pale centre anterior
to ovellar tubercle, Epistomial suture very dark
brown. Aréas of top of head not occupied by the
spotting described above are mostly occupied by
brown Which does not quite reach the spots, A very
dark bund runs from compound eye to antenna
base. Genae with an irregular mark below compound
eye and two small marks above base of mandible.
Postelypeal stripes dark and clearly defined. Antecly-
peus dark in basal half, pale in distal half. Labrum pale
brown with dark brown proximal border, Scape, pedi-
cel pale brown and basal half of first flagellar segment
pale brown, remainder of flagellum brown, Eyes black.
Ocellar tubercle black. Maxillary palp with third and
fourth segments dark brown, otherwise pale. Thorax
distinctively marked, being very dark chocolate brown
with only parapsidal furrows and a narraw median
line between dorsal lobes pale, the line between the
dorsal lobes extending for a short distance onto
hind part of anledorsum. Pleura mostly dark brown,
Femora irregularly marked in various shades of
brown, darkest at distal end. Tibiae brown, darker
at each end, Tarsi brown. Fore wings (Fig. 46)
hyaline, densely speckled brown, Hind wings hya-
line, faintly tinged with grey, Abdomen pale with a
few brown marks; terminal structures dark brown,
Morphology: Length of body: 3.8 mm, Upper
angles. of head produced a little sa that the eyes
are very prominently held on short, thick “stalks”.
Median epicranial suture very distinct, anterior arms
absent, Vertex slightly lower in middle than laterally,
thus accentuating eye prominence, Postclypeus
almast square when viewed [ram front of head; not
475
very prominent. Lengths of flagellar segments: f):
1,16 mm, fa: 1,04 mm, Antennae very fine, with
long setae, some as long ws seven times flagellar
diameter. Eyes large, prominent on cephalic exten-
sions, upper margins high above level of veriex-
TO/D; 1.4; PO: 0.94. Ocelli large on prominent
tubercle; epicranial plates concave an either side of
oeellar tubercle, thus accentuating tubercle pro-
minence, Measurements of hind leg: F: 1.12 mim;
Ts 2.64 mm) t;: 0.68 tam; ta: O14 mm; rt: Sil;
ci; 29, 2. Legs lang, thin, with very spiny tibiac,
Femora narrow, parallel sided. Fore wing lengihy
6.5 mm; width: 2.1 mm, Se meets R distally, Rs
and M fused for a length, Discoidal cell incurved on
distal margin, Cu,, and M fused for a length: basal
and second sections of Cu,,, at a slight angle to one
another. Hind wing length; 4.8 mim width; J.6 mm,
Rs and M fused for a short length. Margin glabrous.
Epiproct (Fig, 48), Paraproct (Pig. 49), Hypan-
drium (Fig. 47). Phallosome (Fig. 50).
Female
Unknown.
Material Examined> SOUTH AUSTRALIA, ¢
(holotype), Pooginook Park, 15.vi.1979, G. A.
Holloway. Paratype: 3, as holotype.
Holotype and paratype in the Australian Museum.
Blaste magnifica is a very distinctive, large and
easily recognized species, It is the only species in
the genus in Which the wing is mottled with an
overall pattern of small, irregularly contluent spots,
The hypandrium is distinctive, with an unusual hind
border which is medially sclerotized and carries two
small projections, one on each side of the midline.
The phallosome is also of unusual form for the
genus. As im the case of the graup of Species asso-
ciated with B, macrops, mentioned above, it. muy
be necessary to recognize this species in a separate
genus. when the large genus Blaste is revised,
Blaste angusta sp. n.
Male
Coloration (in alcohol): Head pale brownish with
dark brown, irregular, confluent spots adjacent to
compound eyes, across vertex and adjacent to
median epicranial suture, A narrow brown band
surrounds antenna base. Postclypeal striations dark
brown, A brown ovoid patch with pale centre lics
anterior to ocellar triangle just posterior to episto-
mial suture. Genae pale with two small spots below
eye. Afitennae brown, a little paler in basal four
segments than more distally. Maxillary palps pale
basally, fourth segment yery dark brown. Meso-
thoracic antedorsum dark brown, parapsidal furrows
broadly pale; scutellum pale; a posterior lateral pale
line on each dorsal lobe. Femora pale brown, dark
476
FIGS, 51-55, Blaste angusta sp, n. 51, ot Fore wing. 52. H
REC. 8. AUST. MUS. 18 (20): 453-49L.
May, (O84
ypandrium, 53. Phallogome. 54. gd Paraproet. 55, Bpiproct and
ninth tergite,
along dorsal and lateral surfaces. Tibiae pale brown,
a little darker at cach end, 'Tarsi dark brown. Fore
wing (Fig. 51) hyaline with markings in various
shades of brown, Hind wings hyaline, a brown spot
at wing base. Abdomen pale with slightly darker,
irregular, segmentally arranged markings in basal
two thirds; distal third occupied by the almost black,
extensively sclerotized terminal structures; eighth
sternite extensively and very heavily sclerotized.
Morphology: Length of body: 3.0 mm. Median
cpicranial suture very distinct but anterior arms
absent, Median part of epistomial suture sinuous,
Length of flagellar segments: f): 0.80 mm; f.: 0.64
mm, Flagellar setae about three times as Jong as
flagellar width, Eyes large, inner margins divergent
behind when seen from above and just reaching level
of vertex. IO/D: 1.9; PO: 1.0. Measurements. of
hind leg; F: 0.50 mm; T; 1.80 mm; ty: 0,56 mm;
ty: 0,20 mm, rt; 2,8;1; ct: 27, 1. Fore wing length;
4.0 mm; width: 1.4 mm, Fore wing (Fig. 51) with
broad pterostigma, with round hind angle and Ry,
curved to give a concave pterostigma basad of hind
angle, Rs and M fused for a very short length, Sc
ends free in costal cell, runs very close to R. Third
median cell very narrow, My and distal sections
of Cu,, almost parallel but relationship varies some-
what in the four fore wings available for study. Apex
of areola postica fairly broad, Hind wing length:
3.0 mm; width; 1.1 mm. Rs and M fused for a
fairly long length, Ninth tergite (Fig. 55) very
heavily sclerotized, extended posteriorly in the
middle to which extension is attached the small
lobed epiproct. Paraproct (Fig. 54). Eighth sternite
very heavily sclerotized. Hypandrium (Fig. 52).
Phallosome (Fig. 53).
Female
Unknown,
PSCOPTERA OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
Material Examined: South Australia ¢ (holotype),
10 km SW Renmark, L5.vi.1979, G, A. Holloway.
Paratypes: 1 2, as holotype. 1 4, Telowie Gorge,
10 km SE PL, Germoin, 20.v.1981, G, and J, Hollo-
way. 1 4d, W end of Horrock’s Pass, 19.v.1981, G.
and J. Holloway.
Holotype and paratypes in
Museum.
the Australian
Discussion: Blaste angusta is an easily recognized
species. It ig so far the only known Australian
species of Blaste in which cell My in the fore wing
is. Narrow as. well as being well pigmented. The
paramerces, distally broadened into a rough knob, are
characteristic.
Ptycta umbrata New
Prycta umbrata New, 1974. J. Aust. ent. Soc. 13:
297, Figs. 38-44.
Material Examined: SOUTH AUSTRALIA, 2 4,
1 9, 2 km W Williamstown, 8,v,1980, G. and J.
Holloway. 3 co, 11 n., Wilmington, Flinders Range,
6,v,1980, G. and J. Holloway. 1 9%, Alligator Gorge
Rd., near Mt, Remarkable, Flinders Range, 17.vi.
1979, G. Holloway. 1 ?, 6 km W Kapunda, 18-v1.
1979, G. Holloway. 1 #, 25 km E Peake, 23.vi,1979,
G. Holloway. 3 ¢, 1 ¥, Telowie Gorge, 10 km SE
Pt. Germein, 20,v981, G., J, and A. Holloway.
3 2, Germein Gorge, 19,v,1981, G. and J. Holloway.
This species has previously been recorded only
from Victoria.
Prycta glossoptera New
Ptycta glassoptera New, 1974. J. Aust. ent. Soc.
13; 302, Figs, 58-64
Material Exaniined> SQUVH AUSTRALIA, 6 3,
24 n, Pandappa Res., 20 km E Terowie, 16-vi,
1979, G. A. Holloway. 1 9 (macropterous), 2 ?
(brachypterous), I n, 2 km E Parilla, 23.vi,1979,
G. A. Holloway. 1 2 (brachypterous), 1 n, 10 km
SW Renmark, 15.vi,1979, G. A, Holloway. 1 3,
Pooginook Park, 15.vi.1979, G. A. Holloway.
This species has previously been recorded from
Victoria,
Pryeta longipennis sp. n.
Male
Coloration (in alcohol): Head greyish with brawn
markings, A double row of spots adjacent to cam-
pound cycs, ucross back of head and adjacent to
median epicranial suture, a mark along anterior arms
of suture which broadens toward lateral ends; an
avoid spot anterior to ocellar tubercle. Base of
antenna surrounded by a narrow brown band. Post-
clypeal stripes narrow. Antenna dark brown. Maxil-
lary palps pale, fourth segment very dark brown,
ay7
almost black, Mesonotum dark brown, sutures,
median antedorsal stripe and posterolateral edges of
lateral lobes pale. Legs pale, tarsi brown, Fore wing
(Fic. 56) hyaline, with a faint general tinge of
brown and slightly darker brown areas as in tigure:
Abdomen pale, irregularly marked with brown;
terminal structures dark brown.
Morphology: Length of body: 2.3 mm, Median
epicranial suture distinct, anterioc arms evanescent
but position marked by dark stripe, Lengths of
flagellar segments: fy: 0.76 mm; t,: 0.74 mm. Eyes
large, reaching above loyel of vertex, TO/D: 1.3;
PO: 0.91. Measurements of hind legs PF: 0.68 mim
T: (.60 mm; t,) 0.50 mm; to: 0.12 mm; rt: 42:7;
et! 30, 3, Fore wing length; 4.0 mm; width: 1.3 mm.
Fore wings relatively long and narrow. Se ending
free in costal cell. Pterostigma fairly narrow but hind
angle clearly evident. Rs and M fused for a short
length. Discoidal cell broad, distal section of M and
Cu, bordering cell both curved distally towards wing
apex, Basal section of Cu,, slightly sinuous almost
in a line with second section. Hind wing length:
3.2 mm; width: 0.9 mm. Rs and M fused for a
long length. A few marginal setae between Ro).
and R4,.. Epiproct (Fig. 59) lightly sclerotized,
bordered with slightly more heavily scleralized band
of variable width. The posterior medjan part ts
folded back in figure. Hypandrium (Fig, 58) slightly
asymmetrical with a lateral, sclerotized extension of
the dorsally curved, median, straplike band near the
distal end, Phallosome (Fig. 57) with a long pas-
terior median extension.
Female
Coloratian (in alcohol): As ia male. Wings (Fig.
60) slightly darker.
Morphology: Length of body: 2.6 mm, Lengths
of flagellar segments: f;- 0.60 mm; fo: 0.60 mr.
Eyes smaller than in male, not quite reaching level af
vertex. 1O/D: 1.7; PO: 0.82, Measurements of hind
leg: F; 0.56 mm; T: 1.36 mm; t,: 0.40 mm; ty:
0.13 mms tt: 3:1; et: 25, 1, Fore wing length:
3,6 mm; width: 1.0 mm. Venation (Fig. 60)
as in male. Hind wing length: 2.7 mm; width: 0.8
mm. Epiproct (Fig. 61). Subgenital plate (Fig, 64).
Gonapophyses (Fig, 62) with short ventral valve;
dorsal valve tapering to point, distally slightly curved
upwards; spicuwlate in distal third. Sclemte of ninth
sternite (Fig. 63) simple, lightly sclerotized,
Material Examined: SOUTH AUSTRALIA, ¢
(holotype), ? (allotype), Germein Gorge, 19.v.
1981, G. and J. Holloway, Paratypes: 1d. LY
Telowie Gorge, 10 km SE Pt. Germein, 20.v.1981,
G. and J. Holloway. Holotype, allotype und paratype
in the Australian Museum.
478
REC. S$. AUST. MUS, 18 (20); 453-491.
May, 1984
64
FIGS. 56-64, Ptyew longipennis sp, n. 56, 3 Fore wing. 57. Phallosome, 58. Hypandrium. 59. ¢ Epiproct. 60, ? Fore
wing. 61. 2 Epiproct. 62. Gonapophyses, 63, ¢ Ninth sternite. 64, Subgenital plate.
Discussion: Ptycta longipennis is very similar to P.
muogamarra Smithers, from New South Wales, It
is, however, larger and there are distinct differences
in several anatomical features, In the male the distal
median extension of the phallosome is longer and
the median strap-like upcurved part of the hypan-
drium is more nearly symmetrical, In the female the
external valve of P, longipennis is broader and,
although reduced in a similar way, the ventral valve
is more robust. In P. glossoptera the hypandrium is
strongly asymmetrical and in the other Australian
species the hypandrium bears a variety of spines. and
projections,
Females of P. emarginata New, P, glossoptera
New, P, improcera New, P. picta New and P. umbrata
all have some darker brownish marks on the fore
PSCOPTERA OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA 479
FIGS. 65-69. Piveta hollowayae sp. n, 65. 2 Fore wing. 66. 2 Epiproct, 67. Subgenital plate. 68, 9 Ninth sternite,
69. Gonapophyses.
480)
wings, The female of P. cornigera is not known but
the male does not have obvious dark marks. P.
longipennis differs from P. hallowayae sp. n.
(described below) in lacking the rugose areas along
the distal border of the epiproct and in not having
an apical thickening to the posterior median process
of the phallosome; phallosome shape also differs in
that the phallic frame is much narrower in P.
hollowayae and has an anteriorly projecting apo-
physis on each side at the posterior third of the
frame, The fore wing of the female of P. hellowayae
has an interrupted, irregular brown band from
stigmapophysis to nodulus. In P. hollowayae the
dorsal valve of the gonapophyses is broad and the
ventral valve not shortened to the extent that it is
in P. longipennis.
REC. 8. AUST. MUS. 18 (20): 453-491,
May, 1984
Ptycta hollowayae sp. n.
Female
Coloration (in alcohol); Head and appendages
very similar to Piycta emarginata New but with post-
clypeal striae not obsolete in midline and frons with
a small dark circle in midline anterior to ocelli.
Thoracic lobes dark brown but each broadly
bordered with pale areas. Fore wings (Fig. 65)
hyaline with very faint overall brown tinge and
marked in shades of brown. Hind wings hyaline
with very faint suggestion of brownish area behind
end of Cus.
Morphology: Length of body: 3.8 mm. Median
epicranial suture distinct, anterior arms absent. Head
broad across vertex, eyes large, just reaching level
FIGS. 70-73, Prycta hollowayae sp. n. 70, & Fore wing. 71. 3 Epiproct. 72. ¢ Paraproct. 73. Phuallosome.
PSCOPTERA OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
of vertex. LO/D: 1.8; PO: £.0. Ocelli large, anterior
oeellus only little smaller than lateral oeelli. Length
of flagellar segments: f,: 0.96 mm; f,: 0.76 mm.
Measurements of hind leg: F: 0,92 mm; T; 2.0
mm; t,: 0.56 mm; ty: 0.20 mm; rt: 2.8:1; et: 22,
4, Front femora noticeably broader than femora of
middle and hind legs. Fore wing length; 4.4 mm;
width: 1.4 mm, Fore wing with Rs and M meeting
in a point, joined by a crossvein or fused tor a very
short length. Pterostigmal spurvein minute, hardly
discernible, Fore wing glabrous. Hind wing length:
3.3 mm; width: tt mm. About ten marginal setae
between Re;g sod Rass. Epiproct (Pig. 66).
Gonapophyses (Fig, 69). Dorsal valve broad with
fairly long apical, pointed extension, External valve
with distinct lobe lying adjacent to dorsal margin of
dorsal yalye, Subgenital plate (Pig. 67) with short,
truncate, posterior lube on the upper side of which
near the posterior margin is a small, irregularly shaped
thickening of the internal membrane, Y-shaped pig-
mented urea with shoct, broad, “stem”, the ends of
the “arms” broad but somewhat apically divided.
Selerificuiion of ninth sternile (Fig. 68) in form of
an ovoid, very heavily sclerotized plate,
Male
Colorahem Cn alcohol); Head and appendages
as In female but head markings reduced in uccor-
dance with greater eye size. Pore wings (Fig. 70).
Hind wings hyaline.
Morphology: Length of flagellar segments; f;:
1,04 mm; fu: 0.84 mm. Antennae thicker than in
femule, finely pubescent, 1O/D: 1,1: PO: 1.0, Eyes
mich larger than in female, reaching well above
level of vertex with inner margins diverging pos-
teriorly when viewed from above; emarginate
posleriorly-medially above. Measurements of hind
leg! Fi 1.0 mm; T: 2.24 mm; ty: 0.60 mm); t*}
0.18 mm; rt: 3.3:1; ct: 27. 4, Fore wing length;
5.0 mm; width; 1-7 mm. Pterostigmal spurvein
absent, Rs and M joined by a very short crossyein,
in length only a little greater than vein thickness.
Hind wing length: 3.7 mmy; width: 1,3 mm, A few
fine setae on margin between Ros, and Ry)s -
Epiproet (Fig. 71) lightly sclerotized with broad,
thickened, marginal band of varying width; hind
margin transverse; a basal, upstanding, broad-
margined lobe partly overlies ninth tergite, the lobe
medially slightly ¢marginate. Paraproct (Fig. 72).
Hypandrium similar ta that of Pivela glossaptera
(New 1974, Fig. 62), Phallosome (Fig, 73).
Material Exanined: SOUTH AUSTRALIA,
(holotype), & Callotype), 15 km W Tailem Bend,
13.v.1980, G. and J. Holloway. Paratypes: 1 2%, as
holotype. | 2°, 18 km N Ardrossan, 8,v,1980, G, and
48)
J. Holloway. 1 ?, | km E Edithburgh, 7.v. 1980, G.
and J. Holloway.
Holotype, allotype and paratypes in the Aus-
tralian Museum.
Discussion: Piyeta hellowayae resembles P. emiar-
ginara New (? only known) and P. glosseptera New
(both sexes know), Jt differs from bath in being
larger und the female has more extensive wing
markings. The male of P. Aollowayvae differs from
that of P, glosseprera in the form of the paraprocts
and in proportions of the phallosome (although
general shape is similar). The Jateral projections are
more pronounced in P. hollowayae, The epiproct and
the hypandrium are similar in the two species. The
anterior lobe of the epiprect appears ta be folded
back in the illustration given by New (1974, Fig.
64), In P, cornigera, PL impracera and P. wnbrata
the hyandrium bears spines and various processes
which are not present in P. hellowayae. From P.
hiuegaiara P. hollowayae dilers in the form of
proportions of the phallosame and in not having
the ventral valve of the yonapophyses reduced. Com-
parison with P. longipennis has been made above.
Tanystigma tardipes (Edwards)
Clematostigina tardipes Edwards, 1950. Pap. &. Soe.
Tasm. 1949: 95, Figs. 1-17.
Copastigma (Clematostigna) tardipes (Edwards).
Smithers, 1967, Aust, Zoal, 14 (Ll): 103,
Tanystigina rardipes (Edwards), Smithers, in press.
Aust, ent. Mag.
Material Examined) SOUTH AUSTRALIA. 1 1
9, 12 km SE Port Wakefield, 8.v.1980, G. and J.
Holloway. I 4, 3 2, 1 n, 4 km S Moonta, 7.v, 1980,
G. and J, Holloway, 1 2, Port Elljot, 13.v.1980, G.
and J, Holloway, 2%, Wilmington, Flinders Ranges,
6.v.1980, G, and J. Holloway. 1 ¢, 2 4%, 18 km N
Ardrossan, 8.vy.1980, G. and J. Holloway. 2 4, 2 2,
23 km E Tailem Bend, 13.v.1980, G. and J. Hailo-
way. 1 g, 1 2, Telowie Gorge, 10 km E Pt. Ger-
mein, 20,v,1981, G, und J, Holloway, 4 2,5 9,
Farina, 1 7.v.198L, G. and J. Holloway.
T. tardipes was described from Tasmania and has
been recorded from Victoria.
Tanystigma elongata sp. n.
Male
Coloration (in alcohol): Head pale grey-brown
with dark brown markings; A double row of con-
fluent spots adjacent to median epicranial suture,
werass back of vertex and adjacent to compound
eyes; a spot between ocellar tubercle and epistomial
suture; an irregular ring around antenna base; dis-
linct postclypeal striations. Epicramal suture dark
brown Labrun) pale brown, Genae grey-hrown.
Antennae dark brown. Eyes purplish. Ocellar
482 REC. 8, AUST. MUS, 18 (20); 453-491,
May, 1984
FIGS. 74-78, Tanystigina clongata sp. un, 74. d Fore nite. 75, Phallosome. 76, Hypandrium, 77, ¢ Puraproct, 78. @
piproct,
tubercle dark brown, First and second maxillary palp
segments very pale brown, third and fourth segments
dark brown, Mesothoracic notum dark brown
except for pale brown parapsidal sutures and pos-
terior borders of dorsal lobes. Femora brown with
darker apical band; tibiae pale brown, darker at
each end; tarsi dark brown. Fore wings hyaline with
brown pattern (Fig. 74). Hind wings hyaline, veins
brown, Abdomen pale with irregular lateral seg-
mentally areanged marks; terminal structures very
dark brown.
Morphology: Length of body: 3.1 mim. Median
epicranial suture distinct, anterior arms not evident.
Epistamial suture sinuous, curved forwards in
middle, interior to anteocellar spot. Length of
flagcllar segments: f;; 0.90 mm; f.: 0.84 mm.
Antennae fine, flagellar setae up to three times as
long as Hagellar diameter. Eyes large, reaching a
little above level of vertex. IO/D: 1.2: PO; 1,0,
Eyes slightly emarginate opposite antenna base,
Measurements of hind leg; F: 0.76 mm; T: 1.80
mm; ty! 0.46 mm; t.: 0.20 mm; rt: 2.3:1; cl: 21,
4. Tarsal segments long, ctendia large. Fore wing
length: 4.9 mm; width: 1.6 mm. Fore wing. Fore
wing (Fig. 74) with Sc ending in R. R, almost
straight basad of hind angle of pterostigma; R,
almost straight between hind angle and wing margin,
Pterostigmal spurvein obvious. Rs and M fused for
a short length, Veins somewhat evanescent at forking
of Rs, second half of Cu,), basal section of Cu,,
and the third quarter of outer margin of discoidal cell,
Cuz, and M fused for a very short Iength. Hind
margin of wing near base thin, rugose. A few small,
fine selae on wing margin from proximal end of
pterostigma fo wing apex, Hind wing length: 4.0
mm; width; 1,2 mm. Hind wing with Rs and M
fused for a length. A few small marginal setae
between Ro+s and wing apex, Epiproct (Fig, 78)
well sclerotized, less so laterally, with a pair of small,
crect basal lobes, Paraprocts (Fig. 77) with large
field of trichobothria and a lightly sclerotized, setose
dome between trichobothria and the apical spur.
Apical spur broad-based with sharply pointed,
PSCOPTERA OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA 483
FIGS, 79-84, Tanystigma clongata sp. n. 79, 2 Fore wing, 80, 9 Hind wing, 81. Subgenitai plate. 82. @ Ninth sternite.
83, 2 Epiproct, 84, Gonapophyses,
dS4
curved apex, Posterior margin of ninth tersite
strongly sclerotized im middle section, the sclera-
lizution tupering laterally, Hypandrium (Fig. 76)
yery heavily sclerotized wilh two inwardly curved,
posterior projections which are laterally serrate
between the bases of which the hind margin of the
hypandrium is medially emarginate and bers a
small median, rounded ventral sclerite, Phallosome
(Fiz 75, ulted in preparation) consistiny of two
elongate, narrow, basally fused, distally divergent
external parameres each with pointed, apicul sclerite.
Fentale
Colorqtion (in aleohol): Body ¢oloration as in
mile but with a medion pale hrawn line on ante-
dorsum of mesothorax and abdomen distmetly
banded with brown, Antennae os in male but scape,
pedicel and first two flagellar segments yery pale.
Third maxillary pal scgment pale in distal hall.
Labrnm pale, darker medially. Legs as in male,
Fore wings (Fig. 79) hyaline with pattern more
extensive than in male. Hind wings (Fig. 80) with
some very pale brown colour.
Morphology: Length of body: 3.5 mm. Length af
flagellar segments: Iy° 0.80 mm; fur O80 mm.
Antennae fine, flagellar setae about as long as
flagellar diameter, that is, setae are relatively much
shorter than in male, Eyes much smaller than in
ale. not reaching level of vertex. TIO/D: 2.2; PO:
Q.8. Anterior oeellus much smaller than lateral
ocelli. Epistomial suture sinuous anterior ta ocellar
tubercle, Measurements of hind leg: F; 0.72 mm;
T; 1.56 mm; ty): 0.38 mm; te: 0.20 mm) rts 1,9) 1)
ct: 19, 0. Ctenidia small. Fore wing length: 4.1
mm; width: 1.4 mim, Fore wing (Fig. 79) similar
lo that of tale but pterostigma a little broader,
with murgin both basad and distal of hind angle
very slightly sinuous. Spurvein obvious. Areola
pustica. joined to media by a short crossvein. Mar-
ginal Selae as in male, between base of plerostigma
and wing apex. Epiproct (Fig. 83). Subgenital plate
(Fig. 81) with long, rounded posterior lobe with
broad, irregular median band without pigment.
Gonapophyses (Fig, 84), Selerifications of ninth
sternite (Fig, 82),
Material Examined: SOUTH AUSTRALTA. ¢
(holotype). ¥ Callotype), 20 km SE Port Augusta,
Horrocks Puss, 17.vi1.1979, G. A. Hollaway. Para-
types: 1 9, Mt. Ohlissen Bragge, Wilpena Pound,
18.v.198l, G. and J. Holloway, 4 2, Germein
Gorge, 20.v.1981, G. and J. Holloway,
Holotype, allotype and paratypes in the Austra-
lian Museum.
Discussion: Tanya elongata is the only species
of the genus in which there ate extensive wing
REC. S, AUST. MLS, 18 (20): 453-491.
May, (98d
‘markings in eetls Ry, Ry and Rs, Cu, Cus and the
discoidal cell. Lt is easily recognized on this feature.
Tatystigma bifurcata sp. n.
Fomale
Coloration (in alcohol): Head pale buff with
dark brown spotting on either side of mediun epi-
cruml suture, across back of vertex and adjacent
lo compound cyes. Area between epistomial suture
and ocellar tubercle wilh ovoid brown mark en-
closing a pale central spot. Postelypeus pale bulf
with fine parallel brown lines, very distinct, running
forward ftom epistomial suture but mot reaching
unteclypeus, Labrum dark brown with median,
amerior, semicircular pale area. Genae. pale, not
marked. Scupe. pedicel and basal part of first fla-
wellar segment brown, rest of antenna dark, almost
black, Fyes black. Ocelli on very dark brown
tubercle, First and second maxillary palp sczments
pale; third segment dark in’ basal half, dark dis-
tally; fourth segment dark brown, Mesothoracic
notum dark brown with aumedian pale stripe; dorsal
Jobes. with a small pale area near postero-lateral
corner, Metanotum similar to mesonotum, Pleura
dack brown with same puler areas. Coxae dark
brown. Femora pale with some ifegular brown
marks und slight suggestion of preapical dark bund.
Vibiae pale brown, Tarsi brown. Fore wings (Pig.
85) hyaline with brown markings. Hind wings hya-
line, with faint brownish patch behind distal end
af Cus.
Morphology: Length of body: 3.5 mm. Head
with well rounded vertex. Median epicranial suture
very distinct, Postelypeus fairly bulbous. Lengths of
flagellar segments: #4: 0.64 mmy fo: 0.52 mm. Eyes
fairly large. TO/D: 1,1; PO: 0,80. Lateral ocelli
very large, anterior ocellus small, Measurements of
hind leg: F: 0.66 min; T; 1.44 mm; ty: 0.36 mm;
tos O.16 mmy rts 2.321; et: 18, 1. Fore wing length:
4.) mm; width: 1.40 mm, Subcosta well developed
basally, straight, becoming evanescent in costal cell.
Stigmopophysis well developed, dome shaped. Ry
beyond sligmapophysis fine, ie, hind margin of
pterostizma fine, Spurvein very small. Postptero-
stisinal mark indistinct as it is of same colour as
pigniented area but can be recognized by difference
in texture [rom base to hind angle of pterostigma.
Rs and M fused for a length, Rs and branches of
Rs evanescent neur bifurcation, M between Rs and
Cu,, Strongly curved to give a concave outer margin
to discaidal cell. Hind wing length: 3.2 mm; width:
1,0 mm, Se evanescent in costal cell, Rs. and M
fused for a length, Wing margin between Ross
and Rass with twelve well developed but short
setuc. Epiproct (Fig. 86), Paraproct (Fig, $9). Sub-
genital plate (Pig, 87). Gonapophyses (Fig. 90).
Sclerificationy of ninth sternite (Fig. 88).
PSCOPTERA OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA 4f5
FIGS, 85-90. Tanystigma bifurcata sp. n. 85. 2 Fore wing. 86. 9 Epiproct. 87, Subgenital plate. 88. 9 Ninth
sternite. 89, & Paraproct. 90. Gonapophyses.
186 REC. S. AUST, MUS, 18 (20): 453-491,
May, 198¢
PIGS, 91-94, Sanyitigina bifurcata 3p. 1. 91. & Bore wing. 92, Phallosome. 93, 3 Epiproct, 94, Hypundrium.
Male
Coleraia (in alcohol): Body coloration as
female. Fore wiugs (Fig. 91) hyaline. Hind wings
hyaline without brownish area behind Cus.
Morpholegy: Postclypeus not as bulbous as in
female. Length of flagellar seoments; f;: 0,80 nim;
fu; 0.64 mm. Byes very large, reaching just above
level of vertex, LO/D: 1.0; PO: 0.94, Ocellar tubercle
very well developed. Measurements of hind leg: FP:
0.72 mm; T- 1-72 mm; t)! 044mm; ta: 0.18 mm) rt:
2.4: 15 ct: 18,4, Legs long and thin. Pore wing length:
4.2 mm; width: 1.5 mm, Fore wing with indistinct
plerostigmal spurvein but postpterostigmal mark
Well developed. M distad of separation from Rs
strongly curved to give concave discoidal cell, Hind
Wing length; 3,1 mm; width; 1.l mm, A few fine
marginal setae between Roys and R445. Epiproct
(Fig, 93), Hind margin of ninth tergite well sclero-
tized with two small projections against which the
epiproct articulates. Latero-ventral margin of ninth
tergite on each side ends in a rounded apophysis,
Hypandrium (Fig. 94). Phallosome (Fig. 92),
Material Examined: SOUTH AUSTRALIA. ? (holo-
type), & (allotype), 18 km S Port Pirie, 7,v.1980,
G. and J. Holloway. Paratypes: 7 2, 7 c', as holotype.
1d 1 2%, 15 km N Port Broughton, 7.y.1980, G.
and J, Holloway, 1 2, 4 km E Pinnaroo, 14.v.1980,
G. and J, Holloway, 1 %, Alligator Gorge Rd., near
Mt. Remarkable, Flinders Range, 17.vi.1979, G. A,
Holloway, 1 @, Qverland Corner, 15.vi.1979, G. A-
Holloway,
Holotypes, allotype and paratypes in Australian
Museum.
Discussion: Tanystignia bifurcata is yery similar to
Psocidus nolialiy Smithers, described from Western
Australia, In both species the pterostigmal spur-
vein is very small, the hypandrium is symmetrical
and somewhat bilobed and (he phallosome has
apically divided external parameres, In all other
species of Tanysiigma the external parameres are not
so divided. The female yenitalia differ in details
Irom those of other species of Tanystigina and the
extent ol wing marking is considerably greater than
in females of Ps, norialis, T. pantuin (Smithers) and
T. tardipes (Edwards). [t is similar ta that of T.
dubium (New) but that species lacks the dark mark
at the wing margin in cell Ry. Ps. notialiy was not
placed in Tunystigia when the latter genus was
erecied because of the bifurcation of the external
parameres and the very small pterostigmal spurvein
in both sexes, The discovery of T. bifurcata, haw-
ever, indicates the inclusion of both in Tanystigma.
T. netialis (Smithers) comb, nov, and T. hifiureata
do stand apart somewhat from the other species
of the genus in having apically divided external para-
meres. They differ from cach other in that T. bifur-
cata has a longer phallasome and the wing mark-
ings are less extensive in female 7. notialis than
they are in T, bifureata. The statement made by me
PSCOPTERA OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA 487
FIGS 95-100. Psecidus mouldsi sp. n. 95. 2 Fore wing. 96. Subgenital plate. 97. 2 Epiproct. 98. @ Ninth sternite. 99.
@ Paraproct. 100, Gonapaphyses,
+08
(Smithers, 1972) that “.., Ps. netiulis will probably
he found to be cangenerie with ,..” Clematostigma
tardipes Edwards and C, meculiceps Enderlein has
not been supported by subsequent study of material
of &. maculiceps (Smithers, 1983).
Psocidus mouldsi sp. n.
Female
Coloration (in alcahol): The colour pattern of
this species is very similar to that of the males of
Blayre qigusta, described above. The spotting on the
head is fiver and the spots quite discrete and the
ovoid mark anterior to the ocellar triangle is very
conspicuous, The terminal structiices of the abdo-
men are dark, the Subgenilal plate being very con-
spicuous owing to the heavily sclerotized T-shaped
area, Fore wing (Fig, 95) hyaline, marked in various
shades of brawn,
Morphology; Length of body: 4,0 mm. Brachy-
ptcrous, fore Wings not reaching end of abdomen.
Lengths af flagellar segments: fy: 0.64 mm; fos 0,52
moi, Eyes nat reaching vertex level. IO/D: 3.4)
PO; 0.83. Measurements of hind leg: F: 0.64 mm;
T: 1.84 mm ty): O48 mm; te: 0.20; rt: 2.4:1;
et: 21, 2. Fore Wing length: 3.4 mm; width: 1.3 mm,
Rs and M fused for a yery short Jength, Third
median cell narrow and almost parallel sided. Hind
wing length: 2.9 mm; width: 1.0 mm, Rs and M
fused for a short length, Epiproct (Fig, 97) lightly
sclerotized with two, small, curved sclerotized ares
about half way along epiproct and midway between
middle and Jateral edge of epipract. Paraproct (Fig.
99) with two internal accessory sclerites attached
10 paraproct by membrane (displaced in ilustra-
lion). Subgenital plate (Fig, 96) with heavily
sclerotized transverse bar basad of posterior Jobe;
posterior lobe long with unusual pattern of sclero-
tization and pigment, having an ovoid, less sclero-
tized area near base of lobe. Gonapophyses (Fig.
100) with long, aeuminate ventral valve; dorsal
viilve broad, rounded behind, constricted at the
middle und supported by longitudinal sclerifica-
(ions; external valve with dorsal, well sclerotized,
posteriorly directed lobe. Sclerifications of ninth
sternite (Pig, 98) more complex than usual in the
penus,
Male
Unknown,
Material Examined: SOUTH AUSTRALTA, 2
(holotype), 40 km E Nullarbor, 131°15'E, 31°25'S,
29.1x.1978, M. S. and B. J. Moulds. Paratype: 1 3,
as holotype, Holotype and paratype in the Austealian
Museum.
The genus Psovieiys was erected by Pearman
(1934) to hold a large assemblage of species which
had been described in the genus Pocus Latreille
REC. $, AUST, MUS. 18 (20): 453-491,
Vay, 1984
but which could not be retained in his restricted,
redefinition of that genus. Psecidus, therefore, con-
tains many unrelated species. With time it iy hoped
that they will be redistributed amongst present
genera or logically placed in new genera. For the
present Psocidus remains a “holding” genus.
The relationship of Ps. mouldsi and Ps. parilla
sp. n. (described below) are not known, They both
stand apart trom other species of the family and it is
hoped that when further material, including males,
is forthcoming. their position will he clarified.
Psocidis parilla sp. n.
Feniale
Celeration (in alcohol): Head pale grey-brown
with a double row of brown, irregular, confluent
spots adjacent 19 compound eyes. across back of
vertex and on either side of median epicrantal
suture; an oval brown mark anterior to acellar
tubercle; tubercle brown; postclypeal striations
brown; genae not marked. Labrum dark brown.
Antennae almost black. Eyes black. Maxillary palp
with dark third and fourth segments; first and second
segments pale, Mesothoracie notum shiny dark
brown with pale parapsidal furrows, pale line along
postero-lateral parts of lateral lobes and hind half
of mesoascutellum pale. Pleura dark shiny brown.
Coxae dark brown, Femora brown, darker along
anterior and posterior sides with some irregular
darker dorsal marks in distal quarter. Tibiae pale
brown, darker ut each end. Tarsi dark brown. Fore
Wings (Fig, 101) hyaline with pattern in various
shades of brown, Hind wings hyaline with pale
brown patch in distal) quarter of cell Cus adjacent
to vein Cu, but not in distal corner of cell, Abdo-
men pale with dorsal and lateral irregular, seg-
mentally arranged marks. Terminal structures very
dark brawn,
Morphology: Median epicranial suture distinct.
anterior arms evanescent, Epistomial suture sinuous
in middle, curving away from ocellar triangle in
middle section. Length of flagellar segments: f,:
0.92 mm; fy: 0.68 mm. Eyes fairly large. TO/D:
2,5; PO: 0.9, Ocelli large, anterior ocellus smaller
than Jateral ocelli, Measurements of hind leg: F:
0.84 mm: T: 1,92 mm; t,: 0.44 mm; ty: 0,14 mm,
cit 3:12 et: 19, 3. Fore wing length: 4.7 mm; width:
1.4 mm. Fore wing (Fig. 101) with Se ending in R
about hal! way belween wing base and base of
pterostigma, Ry basad of hind angle of pterostigma
yery slightly curved to give a slightly cancave ptero-
Stigma, beyond apex slightly convex. Rs and M fused
for 4 length, M and Rs and Cuy, curved to give
fairly strongly concave discoidal cell. Cu,, fused
with M for a length, Cu,, sinuous basad of fusion:
basal section of Cuy, and apex of arcola postica at
PSCOTERA OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA 489
FIGS. 101-105. Psocidus parilla sp, n. 101. 2 Fore wing, 102, Subgenital plate. 103. 2 Ninth sternite. 104. 2 Epiproct
105. Gonapophyses.
40 REC. 8. AUST. MUS, 18 (20); 453-49).
Slight angle to one another, Fore wing glabrous.
Hind wing length: 3.4 mm; width: 1.1 mm. Hind
wing with Rs and M fused for a Jength, Costal cell
near base broadened, the anterior margin slightly
thickened and finely rugose in broad region, ‘This
part of costal margin would lie adjacent to a slight
thickening of the hind margin of the fore wing in
{light and these two structures probably assist in wing
coupling. A few fine marginal sctae between Rey 3
and wing apex, Epiproct (Fig, 104), Subgenital
plate (Fig. 102). Gonapophyses (Fig, 105).
Sclerifications of ninth sternite (Fig. 103).
Male
Unknown,
Material Examined: SOUTH AUSTRALIA,
(holotype), Pooginook, 5.vi.1979, A. Holloway,
Paratypes: 2 7, as holotype. 2 2, 2 km E Parilla,
23.vi.1979, G, A, Holloway. 1%, 4 km NW Murray
Bridge, 22.v.1981, G,, J, and A. Holloway,
Holotype and paratypes in the
Museum.
Australian
Discussion: See under Psocidus mouledsi-
Family MYOPSOCIDAE
Phlotodes australis (Brauer)
Psocus australis Braucr, 1865. Fer. zool. -hot. Ges.
Wien 15: 908,
Psocus griseipennis McLachlan, 1866. Trans, ent.
Soc, Lond. (3) 35: 348.
Myopsocus griseipennis (McL.). McLachlan, 1866.
Trans, ent, Soc, Lond, (3) 5: 352,
Myopsocus novaezealandiae Kalbe, 1883. But.
Nachr, 9: 145,
Psecus zelandicus Hudson, 1892, Manual of New
Zealand Entomology, p. 107; Pl. XVI, Figs. 2,
2a.
Phlotedes griseipennis (McL,). Enderlein, 1910.
5.8, Ges, naturf. Fr, Berl, 1910 (2): 67,
Atay, 1984
!Myopsocus griseipennis (McL.) Edwards, 1950.
Pap. Proe, R. Soe. Tasm. 1949; 104, Figs, 26-32,
Phlotodes australis (Braver), Smithers, 1975. Ause.
ent. Mag. 2 (4): 76.
Material Examined; SOUTH AUSTRALIA, | ¢
Belair, 28,ix.1935, H. Womersley.
This species has been recorded from all states
except the Northern Territory.
Phlotodes hickmani (Smithers)
Myopsocus australis (Brauer), Hickman, 1934. Pap.
Proc. R. Soe. Tasm. 1933: 85.
Myopsocus griseipenniy (Mcl,), Edwards, 1950.
Pap, Proc, R, Soe, Tasm, 1949) 104, Figs, 26-32.
Myopsecus hickmani Smithers, 1964. Proc. R. ent,
Suc, Lond, (B) 33: 135,
Phlaiodes hickmant (Sm.). Smithers, 1971. J. Aust.
ent. Soc, 10 (1): 24,
Material Examined: SOUTH AUSTRALIA. 3 2,
Morialta, 14.v.1940, H, Womersley. 6 ?, Magill,
6.11.1884, Tepper.
P. hickmani is known from Tasmania and Vic-
toria.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank Professor VY. Y. Hickman
for material of Tasmanian species of Psocoptera for
comparison wilh South Australian matenal; the
several collectors who provided other material,
especially Geoffrey, Janct and Andrew Holloway
and Max and Barbara Moulds; Gordon Grass for
arranging the loan of South Australian Museum
material; the Director of the South Australian
National Parks and Wildlife Service for permission
for work to be done in areas under his jurisdic-
tion; the Australian Research Grants Committee for
providing funds in support of studies of the Pso-
coptera of the Melanesian arcs and possible source
areas; and Martyn Robinson for preparing the illus-
trations to this paper.
REFERENCES
BANKS, N, 1939. New genera and species of Neuropteroid
Insects, Bull, Mus, camp. Zool. Harv, 85 (7): 439-
S04,
CHAMP, B. R. and SMITHERS, C. N, 1966, The insects
and miles associated with slored products in Qucens-
land. 1. Psocoplera. Qd J. Agric. Anim, Sei 22. (3):
259-262,
ENDERLEIN, G. 1903. Die Copeognathen der indo-aus-
tralischen Paunengebietes, Ann, Hist. -nar. Mus. hung.
1: 179-344,
ENDERLEIN, G 1907, Copeognatha. Jn Michaelsen., W-
and Hartineyer, R. Die Fauna Siidwest-Australiens. 1:
233-240), ;
HICKMAN, Y, ¥, 1934. A contribution to the study of
earn Copeognatha, Pup. ray. Soc. Tas, (933;
77-84.
McLACHLAN, RB. 1866. New genera and species of Pso-
cidae, Trans, ent. Soe. Land. 5 (4): 345-352.
NEW, T, R. 1971. The Psocoptera of Curlis Island, Tus-
mania, J. Aust. ent. Sac, 10 (4): 223-229,
NEW, T.. R, 1973, New species and records of Peripsacus
Hagen (Psocoptera, Peripsouldac) from south east
Australia. J. Aust. ent. Soc. 12: 340-346,
NEW, T. R. 1974. Psocidae (Psocopteru) from southern
Australia. J. Aust. ent. Sac, 13: 285-304.
NEW, T. R. 1975. Aerial dispersal of some Victorian
Psocoptera as indicated by suction trap catches, J.
Aust. ent, Soe. b4: 139-184.
PEARMAN, J, V. 1934. New and little known Africun
Psocoptera. S/ylops 3 (6): 121-132.
SMITHERS, C. N, 19640. New records of Cave and Mine-
dwelling Psocoptera in Australia. J ent. See Qi. 3:
85,
SMITHERS, C. N, 1964b, The Myopsocidae (Psocopleral
of Australia. Pree. R. ens. Sec. Lund. (B) 33: 133-
138.
PSCOTERA OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA 491
SMITHERS, C. N. 1967. A catalogue of the Psocoptera
of the world. Aust. Zool. 14 (1): 1-145.
SMITHERS. C. N. 1970. Psocoptera. In “Insects of Aus-
tralia”. CSIRO, Melbourne.
SMITHERS, C. N. 1972. A collection of Psocoptera (In-
secta) from Western Australia, including four new
species. Aust. Zool. 17 (1): 15-23.
SMITHERS, C. N. 1977. The Psocoptera of Muogamarra
Nature Reserve. Rec. Aust. Mus. 31 (7): 251-306.
SMITHERS, C. N. 1983. A reappraisal of Clematostigma
Enderlein with notes on related genera (Psocoptera,
Psocidae). Aust. ent. Mag. 9 (5): 71-79.
THORNTON, I. W. B., and NEW, T. R. 1977. The Philo-
tarsidae (Insecta, Psocoptera) of Australia. Aust. J.
Zool., suppl. ser. 54: 1-62.
TILLYARD, R. J. 1923. A monograph of the Psocoptera,
or Copeognatha, of New Zealand. Trans. N.Z. Inst.
54: 170-196.
HELMINTH TYPE-SPECIMENS IN THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM
Il. ACANTHOCEPHALA AND CESTODA
BY LESLEY R. SMALES
Summary
Type-specimens of 16 species of Acanthocephala and 80 of Cestoda are catalogued. All except two
are from Australian or Antarctic hosts. Species are listing the helminth types held by the South Aus-
of the genus. Wher a name change has occurred the most recent accepteable name is included.
HELMINTH TYPE-SPECIMENS IN THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM
1, ACANTHOCEPHALA AND CESTODA
by
LESLEY R. SMALES*
South Australian Museum, Adelaide, South Australia 5000
ABSTRACT
SMALES, L. R. 1983, Helminth type-specimens jij the
South Australian Museum, TL Acanthocephala and
Cestoda. Ree. 8. Aust, Mus, 18(21)) 493-501,
Type-specimens of 16 species of Acanthocephala
and 80 of Cestoda are catalogued, All except two
are from Australian or Antarctic hosts, Species are
listing the helminth types held by the South Aus-
of the genus, Where a name change has occurred
the most recent acecptable name is included.
INTRODUCTION
This is the second of an intended series of papers
listing the helminth types held by the South Aus-
tralian Museum and the Australian Helminthological
Collection, currently housed in the Museum,
Species are arranged alphabetically according to
the original name of the genus, Full synonymies are
not given, but where a name change has occurred,
the most recent acceptable name is given together
with the relevant reference. Host-species names are
those used in the original descriptions. Types held
in the South Australian Museum have registration
numbers prefixed by V. Types held in the Australian
Helminthological Collection have registration num-
bers prefixed by AHC or AHC S.
The following abbreviations are used in the text.
A.A.E. = Australian Antarctic Expedition, 1911-
1914; BANZARE — British Australia and New
Zealand Antarctic Research Expedition, 1929-1931;
SAM = South Australian Museum; AHC = Aus-
tralian Helminthological Collection; N.T, =
Northern Territory; N.S.W, = New South Wales;
Old = Oneensland; $.A, = South Australia; Tas. =
Tasmania; Vic. — Victoria; W.A. — Western Aus-
tralia.
PHYLUM ACANTHOCEPHALA
The earliest descriptions of type material held at
the South Australian Museum are those of T. H.
Johnston, Professor of Zoology, the University of
Adelaide, Honorary Director of the Museum 1928-
1931, and Chairman of the Museum Board 1940-
1951, Later deseriptions are by S$. J, Edmonds, Hon-
* Present address: Gippsland Institute of Adyanced Educa-
tion, P.O, Box 42, Churchill, Victoria 3845.
orary Associate of the Museum, who is the foremost
Australian authority on Acanthocephala and con-
tinues active research into the taxonomy of the
group.
Acanthocephalans are parasitic, wormlike pseudo-
coelomates that lack a digestive: system, A diagnos-
tic fealure of the group is the presence of an an-
teriorly placed, invaginable proboscis or introvert,
always armed with hooks,
The adult parasites infest the digestive tract of
vertebrates. Unless otherwise stated specimens listed
below Were dissected from the small intestine.
Arhythmorhynchus limosae Edmonds, 1971
Trans. R. Soe, §, Aust, 95 (2); 58-60,
Paratypes V2185-9, 3 4, 2 9, one in fragments
from Limeosa lapponica, Townsville, Qld,, collector
A. J, Bearup, 2871/59,
Arhythmorhynchus frassoni Molin, 1858
Trans. Roy. Soc. §. Aust. 74 (1): 3 (Johnston &
Edmonds, 1951), now 4, Johnston’ (Molin, 1858
sensu Johnston & Edmonds, 1951), Golvan, 1960.
Paratypes V2183-4, both ¢, one in fragments, from
Numenius cyanopus, Gladstone, Old,, collector T, H.
Johnston, 1910.
Note: Golvan, 1960 made the Australian specimens,
described by Johnston & Edmonds, 1951, a new spe-
cies but gave no reasons for his action.
Corynosoma australe Johnston, 1937
Prac. Linn. Sec. N.S.W. 62 (1/2): 13-16.
Syntypes V2227-9, 4 & and 2 @, from Arcrocepha-
lus forsteri, Pearson Is., S.A., collector J. B. Cleland,
January 1923.
Note: Johnston, 1937, recorded the type as being
deposited in SAM but this does not appear to have
been done. Johnston & Best, 1942 mention that the
type host for C. australe was incorrectly identified
and should have been listed as Neophoca cinerea.
Corynosomg cetaceum Johnston & Best, 1942
Trans, R. Soc. §, Aust. 66 (2); 250-2,
Holotype 2 V964, allotype @ V963, from Del
phinus delphis, Gult St Vincent, S.A., collector pro-
bably 'T. H. Johnston, date unknown,
Echinarhynchus hylae Johnston, 1914
Proc. R. Soc. Old. 36: 83.
494
Now Porrorchis hylae (Johnston, 1914) Schmidt &
Kuntz, 1967.
Type V2540, cotype V2539, from Hylae caerulea
encysted in the liver. Collector probably T. H.
Johnston, date unknown.
Locality: near Brisbane, Qld.
Echinorhynchus menurae Johnston, 1912
Proc. R. Soc. Qld. 24: 83.
Now Plagiorhynchus menurae (Johnston,
Golvan, 1956.
Type V2438, from Menura superba, near Gosford,
N.S.W., collector probably T. H. Johnston, date un-
known.
Note: Johnston, 1914 recorded that the types of E.
hylae and E. menurae had been deposited in the
Queensland Museum, Brisbane. However, on exa-
mination, specimens registered in SAM were found
to be Johnston’s original material.
1912)
Echinorhynchus zanchlorhynchi Johnston & Best,
1937
A.A.E. Rep. Ser. C 10 (2): 12-3.
Holotype ° V2200, from Zanchlorhynchus spinifer,
Macquarie Island, collected during A.A.E. 1911-
1914,
E'mpodius alecturae Johnston & Edmonds, 1947
Rec. S. Aust, Mus. 8 (4): 557-61.
Now Mediorhynchus alecturae (Johnston & Ed-
monds, 1947) Schmidt & Kuntz 1977.
Syntypes V2470-8, from Alectura lathami, Eidsvold,
Burnett River, Qld., collector T. L. Bancroft, date
unknown.
Gordiorhynchus bancrofti Johnston & Best, 1943
Trans, R. Soc. S. Aust, 67 (2): 226-9.
Now Centrorhynchus bancrofti (Johnston & Best,
1943) Golvan, 1960.
Holotype ¢ V2210, cotype @ V2211, from Ninox
strenua, Eidsvold, Burnett River, Qld., collector
T. L. Bancroft, date unknown.
Gordiorhynchus falconis Johnston & Best, 1943
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 67 (2): 229-30.
Now Centrorhynchus falconis (Johnston & Best,
1943) Golvan, 1960.
Holotype ¢ V2212, from Falco berigora, Her-
mannsburg, N.T., collector T. H. Johnston, date un-
known.
Illiosentis furcatus Van Cleave & Linicome, 1939
BANZARE Rep. Ser. B 6 (5): 91-8. (Edmonds,
1957).
Now Illiosentis edmondsi (Van Cleave & Linicome,
1939 sensu Edmonds, 1957) Golvan, 1960.
Lectotype ? V2336, from Upenichthys porosus.
REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18 (21): 493-501.
May, 1984
Station 76, continental shelf east of Albany, W.A.,
collector T. H. Johnston, 1929-1931.
Note: The lectotype here designated was selected
from the original material by Edmonds.
Longicollum pagrosomi Yamaguti, 1935
Trans. R. Soc. S, Aust. 74 (1): 3-5. (Johnston &
Edmonds, 1951.)
Now Longicollum edmondsi (Yamaguti, 1935 sensu
Johnston & Edmonds, 1951) Golvan, 1960.
Holotype ¢, V2349, from Mylio australis, Brisbane
River, Qld., probably collected by T. H. Johnston
in 1918.
Mediorhynchus corcoracis Johnston & Edmonds,
1951
Trans. R. Soc. Aust, 74 (1): 1-3.
Holotype g V2502, allotype @ V2501, from Cor-
corax melanorhampus, Upper Burnett River, Qld.,
collector T. L. Bancroft, date unknown.
Neoechinorhynchus aldrichettae Edmonds, 1971
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 95 (2): 55-8.
From Aldrichetta forsteri (posterior gut), Port Pirie,
S.A., collector L. M. Angel, Port Pirie, S.A., date
unknown.
Paratypes ¢ V2125, 9 V2126.
Pararhadinorhynchus coorongensis Edmonds, 1973
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 97 (1): 19-21.
Holotype $ V2392, allotype ? V2393, from Aldri-
chetta forsteri, Coorong, S.A., collector J. Harris,
1962.
Paratypes V2381-84, 3 ¢ andl 9°.
Note: Edmonds, 1973 recorded the type specimens
(3 and ¢) as being deposited in the Australian
Museum but examination of specimens revealed that
both primary and secondary types had been regis-
tered at SAM.
Pararhadinorhynchus mugilis Johnston & Edmonds,
1947
Trans. R. Soc. §. Aust. 71 (1): 15-7.
Holotype ¢ V2399, from Mugil cephalus, Port Wil-
lunga, S.A., collector T. H. Johnston, 1939.
Note: Paratypes 2400-05, 5 @ showing introvert
well extended, genital complex and eggs, 1 ¢ show-
ing cement glands and genital ganglion.
Polymorphus bizurae Johnston & Edmonds, 1948
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 72 (1): 71-4.
Holotype ¢ V2444, allotype @ V2447, from
Biziura lobata, Tailem Bend, S.A., collectors G. G.
& B. Jaensch and L. Ellis, date unknown.
Pseudoporrorchis hydromuris Edmonds, 1957
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 80: 77-8.
From Hydromys chrysogaster, Innisfail, Qld., col-
lector N. G. Elliot, 10/10/55.
HELMINTH TYPE-SPECIMENS If 495
Nole: Type specimens do not appear to have been
deposited in SAM. There 1s addifional material
V2573-9, collector B. Ewers from Port Moresby,
Papua New Guinea,
PHYLUM PLATYHELMINTHES
CLASS CESTODA
Specimens described by G. Krefft, 1873, are the
oldest material in the type collection. Krelft’s work
was subsequently revised by 'T. H. Johnston. When
Johnston arrived in Adelaide he brought with him
much of the material which had been collected and
deseribed by him between 1909 and 1916 as well as
some of Krefft’s collection. Both T. H. and S.J,
Johnston worked on Australian cestode material dur-
ing the sume period, All the species designated John-
ston were described by T. H, Johnston, Continued
interest has been shown in the Australian cestoda by
a small number of workers since then, Some 80 type
specimens from hosts collected throughout Australia
and from Antarctic waters have been registered at
the SAM or in the AHC.
Unless otherwise stated specimens listed below
were dissected from the intestine of the vertebrate
host,
Acatuhotaenia tidswelli Johnston, 1909
Proc. R. Soc. N.S.W., 43: 103-16.
Paratypes AHC 2051, from Faranus varius, near
Bathurst, N.S.W,, collector T, H. Johnston, date un-
known,
Anomotachia asymmetrica Johnston, 1913
Rep, Aust. Inst. Trop, Med, 1911; 81-2.
Paratype AHC $95, from /erodias timorensis,
Townsville, Qld., from the collection of A, Breinl,
date unknown.
Anomotaenia rhinocheti Johnston, 1911
Proc, Linit, Soc, N.S.W, 36 (1): 70-4.
Cotype AHC $82, from Rhinecheius jubaius, col-
lected in New Caledonia, held in captivity in Sydney
for six months, collector H, E, Finck, date unknown,
Anthabothriunr sexorchidtim Williams, 1964
Parasitology 54: 741-3.
Holotype V1061, trom Taeniyra lvmna, Heron Is.,
oll Rockhampton, Qld,, collector J. Pearson, June
1956.
Balanoraenia hancrofii Johnston, 1924
Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 49 (3); 339-47.
Paratypes V1437-43, including serial sections, from
Tandanus tandanus, Eidsvold, Burnett Rd,, Qld.,
collectors TV, L, & M, J. Bancroft, date unknown.
Balanorcenia newguinensis Mackiewicz & Blair, 1978
J. Helminihal. 32: 201-3.
Paratypes V1158-59 from Tandanus brevidersalis,
Brown R., near Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea,
collector D, Blair, date unknown.
Bancroftiella ardea Johuston, 1913
Rep. Aust, Inst. Trap, Med. 1911: 85-6,
Now Parvitaenia ardea (Johnston, 1913) Baer &
Bona, 1960.
Lectotype V1673, paralectotypes AHC §309-11,
from Nyeticorax caledanicus, Townsville, Qld,, from
the collection of A. Breinl, date unknown.
Nate: The lectotype, selected by Bona (1975), was
labelled in T. H. Johnston's handwriting Nycticorax
caledoanicus, Glasshouse Mts., S, Qld., collector B. B.
Taylor,
Bancroftiella tenuis Johnston, 191la
Prac. Linn. Svc. NSW. 36 (1): SO-7,
Cotype AHC $92, from Macrepus ualabaius, cal-
lector A, S. Le Souéft, date unknown.
Note; Other species in this genus known only from
birds, Johnston (1913) observed that there was no
reason to doubt the accuracy of the collection data.
Bertiella foederata Beveridge, 1976
Aust. J, Zool, Suppl, Ser. 44: 14-16.
Holotype V797, paratypes V798, 799, holotype sec-
tions AHC S968, fram Mseudocheirus peregrinus,
Inverleigh, Vic., collector I, Beveridge, 1/6/75.
Berteiella mawsonae Beveridge, 1976
Aust. J, Zool, Suppl. Ser. 44: 16-18,
Holotype W794, paratype V795, from Schainobates
volans, Dartmouth, YVie,, 20/1/74, collector L.
Beveridge,
Bertiella petavrina Beveridge, 1976
Aust, J, Zool, Suppl. Ser. 44: 21-3,
Holotype V796, from Schoinohates volans, Tumut,
N.S.W., collector R, Smith, 1964-
Riacetabulum tandani Johnston & Muirhead, 1950
Rec, §, Aust, Mus. 9 (3): 346-8.
Holotype V847, from Tandanus tandanus, Tailem
Bend and Murray Bridge, $.A., collectors G. G_
Jaensch, L, Ellis and L, M, Angel, 1947-48,
Bothridium pyihonis yar, parvum Johnston, 1913
Rep, Aust. Inst. Trop. Med, 1911: 91-3,
Type material AHC 2054, from Varanus varius,
Townsville, Old., collector A. Breinl, date unknown.
Bothriocephalus kerguelensis Prudhoe, 1969
BANZARE rep, Ser. B 8 (9): 173-4,
Cotypes V115-27, 567-9, from Notethenia cyano-
hrancha, Royal Sound, Kerguelen, 20/10/29,
10/2/30; Netothena rossi Station 64, Kerguelen,
collector T, H, Johnston.
496
Nate; Prudhoe did not designate type host, or loca-
lity of lype in any of the cestodes he described from
the BANZARE Expedition for 1929-1931. All the
material sent to SAM was designated cotype material
by the author,
Calostaurus mundayi Beveridge, 1975
J. Helminthol. 49: 133-35,
Paratype V55, from Potorous apicalis, Launceston,
Tas,, collector B. L, Munday, date unknown,
Calostaurus thylogale Beveridge, 1975
J. Helminthol. 49+ 129-33,
Paratype V54, from Thylogale hilliardieri, Lautces-
ton, Tas., collector B. L, Munday, date unknown,
Cuapiuterilepis australiensiy Schmidt, 1972
J. Parasitol. 58 (6): 1089-91,
Holotype V L090, paratype V1091-02, from Antho-
choera carunculata, Nicholl’s Reserve, §.A., cal-
lected by SAM, July 1971.
Capiuterilepis meliphagicola Schmidt, 1972
J, Parasitol, 58 (6) + 1091-2.
Holotype V1108, paratype V1109-10, from Phile-
mon corniculatus, Caloundra, Old,, collector pro-
bably 'T. H. Johnston, 1920.
Caryoaustralis sprenii Mackiewicz & Blair, 1980
Proc. Helm, Soc, Wash. 47 (2); 169-72.
Paratype V1899, from Tandanus ater, Annan R.,
Helemvale, Qld., probable collector D. Blair, date
unknown.
Choanotaenia meliphagidarum Johaston, 191 1¢
Prac. Linn. Soe. N.S,\W, 36 (1): 58-70.
Now Pseudochoanotaenia meliphagidarum (Jotin-
ston, 1911) Schmidt, 1972,
Cotypes AHC $87, 8&8, 89, 389, fram Ptilotis
leucets, Sydney and Hawkesbury District, N.S.W.,
collectors T, H, Johnsion & J. B. Cleland, 1909,
Note; Although designated cotype by T. H. Johnston
some of the material in the AHC was collected from
Meliornis sericea and Meliornis novaehellandiae as
well as Prilatis leucotiy,
Choanotaenia taylori Johaston, 19124
Mem, Old. Mus. 1: 213.
Coiype AHC $90, from Malurus cyanoclamys, near
Adelaide, §.A., collector J. B. Cleland, 1910.
Cittatdenia bancrofti Johnston, 1912¢
Prac, R, Soe, Qld. 24: 68-9.
Now Progamotaenia hancrofti (Johnston,
Nybelin, 1917 after Beveridge, 1980.
Holotype (sectioned material) V2121, from Quay-
chogale frenata, Burnett R,, Qld,, collector T. L.
Bancroft, date unknown,
1912)
REC, S, AUST, MUS. 18 (21): 493-501.
Mi ay, 198d
Cittotuenia lagerchestis Lewis, 1914
Prac, Zool, Soc., Lond. 1914; 420,
Now Pregametaenia lagorchestis (Lewis, 1914)
Nybelin 1917 after Beveridge & Thompson, 1979.
Neotypes V1322, 1323, Barrow Is., W.A., collector
L. Hemsley,
Note: The original type material [rom Lagorchestes
conspicillatus collected on Hermit Is,, Montebello
Group, W.A. by P. D, Montague 21914 has been
reported as lost (Beveridge, 1976; Beveridge &
Thompson, 1979), Two similar yet distinct species
have been confused under the name P. lagorchestis
(Lewis, 1914). The original species is redescribed
by Beveridge & Thompson (1979) as above, The
specimens described by Beveridge in 1976 represent
a new species designated P. thylegale by Beveridge
& Thompson (1979),
Cittolaenia tachyglosyi Johnston, 1913
Rep. Aust, Inst. Trop. Med. 1911: 77-8.
Now Echidnoiaenia tachyglossi (Johnston, 1913)
Beveridge. 1980a. Syntypes V1303-14, including
sectioned material, from Tachyglossus aculeatus,
Townsville, Old., from the collection of A, Breinl,
date unknown.
Cyrelorchida omulanchristota Wedl, 1855
Rep. Aust, Inst. Trop. Med, 1911: 86-8. (Johnston,
1913,)
Now C. o. australiensis (Wedl, 1855 sensu Johnston,
1913), Bona, 1975,
Syntypes $312, from Platalea regia, Townsville, Old.,
from the collection of A. Breinl, date unknown.
Davalnea cacafuina Johnston, 1913
Rep. Aust. Inst. Trop, Med. 1911: 79-80.
Now Raillietina cacaiuina (Johnston, 1913) Yama-
suili, 1959,
Paratypes V1081-4, from Cacatua galerita, Towns-
ville, Old., from the collection of A. Breitil, date un-
known.
Davaineéa himantopodis Johnston, 1911¢
Proc. Linn, Soc, N.S.W, 36 (1)) 75-9,
Cotypes AHC $83, from Himantopus leucocephalus,
Tailem Bend, S.A., collector J. B. Cleland, 1910.
Dendrouterina ausiraliensis Baer & Bona, 1960
Boll. Instit. Mus. Zool. Univ, Torino 6 (4); 12-3.
Holotype ¥1676 including sectional material, from
“grey heron”, Swan Reach, §.A., collector T, H.
Johnston, 15/12/37.
Note: Bacr & Bona (1960) record this from Austra-
lian material labelled “Grey Heron” Ardea pacifica
Latham? At the time of the collection “Grey Heron”
was olten used in §.A. for Ardea nevaehallandiae
and in T. H, Johnston's dissection notes there is
recorded “Grey Heron” Nolephoyx novaehollandiae.
N, pavifica was referred to by Johnston as the Pacific
Heron which is a much rarer bird at Swan Reach,
HELMINTH TYPE-SPECIMENS IL
Dilepis bancrelti Johnston, 1912a
Mem. Qld. Mus. 1: 21-2.
Now Hemiparonia bancroftl
Schmidt, 1972.
Type and cotype ANC 891 including sectioned
tnaterial, feom Platycercus exinuus, collector T, H,
Johnston, date unknown,
(Johnston, 1912)
Diphylloborhriunt arctocephalinum Johnston, 1937
Proc, Linn. Sov. NSW, 62 (1): 9-13.
Holotype V13, from Arclocephalus forsteri, Pearson
Is., collector J, B, Cleland, 1923.
Note: Host collection data are identical with thal for
the host of Corynesoma australe. Johnson and Best
(1942) record that the type host was incorreetly
identified and should be regarded as Neophoca
cinerea.
Echinobethrium heronensis Williams, 1964
Parasitology 54: 737-40.
Paratype V1066, holotype V1060, from Taenuira
lyma, Heron Ts,, off Rockhampton, Qld,,. collector
J. Pearson, June 1956.
Lutetrarhynchus australis Prudhoe, 1969
BANZARE Rep. Ser. B 8 (9): 176-7.
Catypes V143, 144, 605, from Mustelus antarcticus,
Hobart, ‘Tas., collector T, H. Johnston, November
1930.
Hymenolepis aklei Beveridge & Barker, 1975
J. Helminthal. 49, 220-4.
Paratypes V68-70, holotypes V67, from Antechinus
steariii, Pawelltown, Vie., collected by the authors
17/8/74.
Hymenolepis bradleyi Beveridge & Barker, 1975
J, Helminthol, 49: 224-6,
Paratypes V72-4, holotype V71, from Anrechinus
sinartii, Powelltown, Vic., collected by the authors
23/3/74.
fivmencolepis ellisi Johnston & Clark, 1948a
Trans. R. Soe. 8. Aust. 72 (1): 81-2.
Holotype ¥2803, from Pelecanus conspicillatus, col-
Ivectors G. G., Fred & B, Jaensch and L. Ellis, date
unknown. Locality: Tailem Bend, 5.A.
Hymenolepis jaenschi Johnston. & Clark, 194828
Trans, R. Soe. §, Aust. 72 (1): 79-81,
Holotype V2804, from Pelecanus canspicillatus,
Tailem Bend, S.A., collectors G. G., Fred and B.
Jaensch and L. Ellis, date unknown.
Hymenolepis murrayensis Johnston & Clark, 1948a
Trans, R, Soc. S. Aust. 72 (1): 77-9,
Holotype V2802, from Pelecanus conspicillatus,
Tailem Bend, §,A,, collectors G, G,, Fred and B.
Jaensch and L, Ellis, date unknown,
Lapwingia ddelaidae Schmidt, 1972
J Parasitol 58 (6): 1085-7.
497
Paratypes V1105-7, holotype V1104, from Lebibyx
novaehollandiae, Townsville, Old., collector and date
unknown (probably from A, Breinl’s collection 1910
to 1913),
Lateriporus maw soit Prudhoe, 1969
BANZARE Rep, Ser, B 8 (9); 190-1.
Cotypes V362-71, from Chionis minor, Kerguelen
Is., collector T, H. Johnston, 17/11/29.
Noie; Several other collection. sites are listed, Also
recorded from Chionis minor crozetlensis, Possession
Island, Crozets, 3/11/29.
Megalonchas dubius Prudhoe, 1969
BANZARE Rep, Ser, B 8 (9): 180-2.
Cotypes V156-8, from Mustelus antarcticus, Hobart,
Tas., collector T, H. Johnston, November 1930,
Megalonchos musteli Prudhoe, 1969
BANZARE Rep. Ser. B 8 (9): 179-80.
Cotypes V152-5, from Mustelus antarcticus, Hobart,
Tas., collector T. H, Johnston, Navember 1930,
Montezia diaphana Zschokke, 1907
Zentralbl, Backterial, Parasitenk, 44: 261-64,
Now Progamotaenia diaphana (Zschokke, 1907)
Baer, 1927 after Beveridge, 1976.
Syntypes V2122, from Lasierhinus latifrons bile
ducts, probably Adelaide, $.A., collector E, Angus
Johnston, date unknown,
Nore: The material registered in SAM is thought by
Beveridge (1976 and 1980b) to be some of the ori-
ginal material described by Zschokke (1907). The
material was mounted by T, H. Johnston and
labelled, in his handwriting, “part of material exa-
mined by Zschokke and Angus Johnston’. There
were no collection data given by Zschokke in the
original description, The host name was recorded as
Phascolomys vombat now a synonym of Vomrbatus
ursinus, Beveridge (1980) believes this identification
to be in error with the type host being Lasiorhinus
latifrons.
Notylocestus majer Johnston & Muirhead, 1950
Rec. S. Aust. Mus, 9 (3): 340-4.
Holotype V854, paratype V855, from Tandanus tan-
danus, Murray Bridge, S.A,, collector L, M, Angel,
December 1947.
Notylocestus minor Johnston & Muirhead, 1950
Ree. §, Aust. Mus. 9 (3): 344-6,
Holotype V856, from Tandanus tandanus, Murray
Bridge, S.A., collector L. M. Angel, December 1947.
Oochoristica antechini Beveridge, 1977
J, Helminthol. 51: 32-5,
Holotype V818, from Antechinys macdonnellensis,
27 km west of Refrigerator Well, Tanami Rd., N,T.,
collector P. Woolley, July 1975.
498
Oochoristica eremophila Beveridge, 1977
J. Helminchel, 51; 35-8,
Holotype V828, paratypes V829-35, from Ante-
chinus rosamundae, Woodstack Stn., via Marble
Bar, W.A., collector P, Woolley, November, 1975.
Ophivtaenia hylae Johnston, 1912¢
Proc. R, Soc, Old. 24: 63-4.
Colypes AHC $86, trom Myla aurea, Sydney, NS.W.,
collector S$, J. Johnston, date unknown,
Ophietaenia longmani Johnston, 1916
Mem. Old. Mus, 5: 186-94,
Cotypes AHC S85, $523, from -lypidiotes ramsayi,
Yeulba, Western QOld., collector H, A, Longman,
date unknown.
Paramoneszia johnston’ Beveridge, 1976
Aust, J. Zool. Suppl, Ser, 44: 31-4,
Holotype V760, paratypes V761-5, from Vombatus
uwrsinus, Forester R., Tas., collector B, L. Munday,
28/4/72,
Parabathriocephalus johnstoni Prudhoe, 1969
BANZARE Rep. BB (9): 174-5,
Cotvpes V128-36, 570 (rom Coryphaenides whitseni,
330 fathoms, 66° 245, 59° 09°F, callector T. H.
Johnston, 7°1/30,
Parvifaenia clavipera Baer & Bona, 1960
Boll. Inst, Mus. Zool, Univ, Torine 6 (4); 3,
Holotype V1675, from Ardea novaehollaniiae,
Townsville, Old., collector not known, possibly A.
Breinl 1910-1913,
Note: This slide labelled Bancroftiella glandularis
(Fuhrmann), in T. A, Johnson's handwriting.
Parvitaéenia paracyclorchidu Baer & Bona, 1960
Boll, Inst, Mus, Univ. Torino @ (4); 1-3 & 44,
Holotype V1674, from Ardea novaelallanliac,
Wamberal. N.S.W., collector S. J. Johnston, date un-
known,
Note: This slide labelled Baneroftiella glaneilaris in
T. H. Johnston's handwriting.
Phaycolotaenia comani Beveridge, 1976
Angst, J, Zool, Suppl. Ser. 44; 35-7,
Holotype V766, paratypes V767-8, from Fombatus
ursinus, Tageerty. Vic., collector B. J, Coman,
19/7/71.
Palyonchobothriin scleropagts Blair, 1978
J. Helinathol, 52 (2); 147-53,
Holotype V1160, paratypes VI16I-5, trom Sclero-
pages Ieichardti, Wenlock R,, Cape York Pen., Qld.,
collector D, Blair, 8/7/75.
Progamotuenia cepyprviuy Beveridge, L976
Anst, J. Zool, Suppl. Ser. 44; 40-1.
REC. 8. AUST. MUS. 18 (21): 493-501.
Muy, (984
Holotype V772, fram Aepyprymnus rufscens, Bur-
nett R., Qld., collector T. L. Bancroft, February
1912,
Progainotaenia effigia Beveridge, 1976
Aust. J, Zoal, Suppl. Ser. 44; 45-7,
Holotype V773, paratypes V774-5, from Macropus
fuliginasus (bile duct), Pine Plains Stn,, via Patche-
wollock, Vic., collector I, Beveridge, 28/6/73.
Progametuenia — gynandroalinearis
Thompson, [979
J. Hlelminthal. 53; 156-7.
Holotype V1315, paratypes VI3L6-9, sectioned
material V1320. from Lagorchestes conspicillatus,
Barrow Is., W.A., collector L. Hemsley, 1976,
Beveridve &
Progamotaenia jolinsoni Beveridge, 1980b
Trany. R. Sac. 8, Aust. Wa (4)2 69-72.
Holotype VY1I918 including sections from Lagor-
chestes conspicillatus, paratype V1919, Mingela,
Old., collector T, Beveridge, 10/5/79.
Progamotaenia lagorchestiy Beveridge, 1976
Aust. J. Zool, Suppl. Ser, 44: 55-8.
Now Prevaniantnenia thylagale Beveridee (1976)
Beveridge & Thomson, 1979.
Holotype V783, paratypes V784, from Thylogale
billardicrii, Launceston, Tus., collector B. L,
Munday,
Progamolaenia macropodis Beveridge, 1976
Aust. I. Zool. Suppl. Ser. 44; 58-60,
Holotype V776, paratypes V777-8, from Macropus
eivantens, Yan Yean, Vic., collector J. H. Arundel,
12/9/72.
Progamotaenia ruficola Beveridge, 1978
J. Parasitol, 64 (2); 273-6,
Holotype V1207-L0, paratypes V1I212-13, AHC
8650, 8651, from Macrepus rufus, Menindec,
N.S.W., collector T. Beveridge, date unknown.
Progamolaenia xspearei Beveridge, 1980b
Trans. R. Soc. 8. Aust. 104 (4): 67-9.
Holotype V1920, from Thylogale stigmatica, Tolga,
QOld., collector I, Beveridge, 16/10/78.
Proteocephalus gallardi Johnston, 19 Lb
Ann. Old. Mus, 10: 1-8.
Now Acanthotaenia vallardi Johnston (1911)
1912¢, Cotypes AHC $80, 81, from Pseudechis por-
phiyriacus, Gostord, Richmond, Hunter R, and Syd-
ney, N.S.W., Gippsland, Vie., collectors L. Gallard,
Cc. T, Musson, F. H. Taylor, W. Hall, A. S, Souell
& T. H. Johnston, 1909-1910,
Nove; Johnston exhibited same specimens of A. gal-
lardi as Tehthyetaenia sp. ata meeting of The Royal
Suciety ol N.S.W. in 1910. However, a full descrip-
tion of the species was not published (as P. gallardi)
HELMINTH TYPE-SPECIMENS If
until T9171. In his paper Johnston did not designate a
type locality, but the slides registered as cotypes with
AHC as Jedihyotaenia gallardi have Narrara, N.S.W.
and Victoria (A. §. Le Souéff collector) as localities,
Tt is known that T. A. Johnston always listed the
type locality first.
Raillietina leipode Johnston & Clark, 1948b
Ree. §. Aust. Mus, 9 (10): 87-90,
Holotype V3044, paratypes AHC 1381, from
Leipoa eeellata, Vailem Bend, S.A,, collector L.
Ellis,
Rhinebothriun himanturi Williams, 1964
Parasitology 54: 740-1,
Holotype V1063, paratype V1064, from Himanrura
grunulata, Heron Is. off Rockhampton, Old., col-
lector J, Pearson, June 1956.
Sphaeruterina punctata Johnston, 1914
Proe. R, Soc. Qld. 26: 76-80,
Cotypes AHC §369, 879, from Pachycephala rufi-
ventyix, Caloundra, N.S.W., collector T. H. Johnston,
August 1914,
TVaenia bairdii Krettt. 1873
Trans. bent. Soc. NSW, 2: 224-7,
Now Microsomacanthus collaris Batsch, 1786, afler
Yumaguti, 1959, Cotypes AHC $77, from Anas
superciliosa, N.S.W,, collector G, Krefft, date
unknown.
Nele: The specimens collected by Krefft constituted
about half the then known cestodes (Johnston,
1912b), However, his descriptions and figures were
not detailed enough for species recognition, For-
tunately most of the type material was deposited in
The Australian Museum and available for re-exa-
mination by Johnston, Although some specimens
were poorly preserved Johnston was able to find bet-
ter preserved material which he identified as the
same species as the types in question. Some of
Kreflts material as redeseribed by Johnston has
been deposited in the AHC,
Taenia chlamydoderae Kreltt, 1873
Trans, Ent, Soe. N.S.W. 2: 224.
Now Paricterolaenia chlamydodere (Keefit, 1873)
Yamaguui, 1959, Cotype AHC $71, fram Chlamy-
dera maculara, collector G. Krefit, date unknown.
Tadenia coronata Kreltt, 1873
Trans, Ent. Soe, NSW. 2: 220-1.
Now Gyrocoelia aiysrraliensis (Krelfi, 1873) John-
ston, 1921h, Cotypes AHC $72, 8344-5, N.S.W,,
collector G. Kreflt, date unknown,
Taenia flacescens Keetit, 1873
Trans. Ent, Soc. NSW. 2: 219.
Now Dioarchis flavescens (Krett, 1873) Johnston,
1912b, Cotypes $73-5, S441, from Anas super-
cilioxa, S_S.W., collector G. Kreflt, date unknawn.
499
Taenia forsteri Krefit, 1873
Trans, Ent, Soc, NSW, 2: 218.
Now Tetrabothrius forsteri (Krettt, 1873) Johnston,
Cotype AHC 578, 1912h, from Delphinus fearsteri,
Port Jackson, N.S-W., collector and date unknown.
Taenia mastersii Kreitt
Trans. Ent. Soe. N.S.W, 2; 217-8.
Cotype AHC $70, from Macropus sp., Qld., col-
lector G. Masters, date unknown,
Note: Beveridge (1976) considered that this species
possibly belonged to Carestaurus,
Taenia parudoxa Kretit, 1873
Trans. Ent. Soe. N.S.W. 2: 217-8,
Cotypes AHC 876, $386, from Podiceps aitstralis,
N.S.W.,, collector G. Kreift, date unknown,
Note: T. paradoaxa is preoccupied by Rudolphi,
1801, Johnston was unable to establish the status of
the species which awaits redescription. Krettt named
the host Little Grebe, Podicepy auviralis, This is now
a synonym of the Crested Grebe. Obviously he
meant what is now Tachybatus novaehollandiae. The
Little Grebe would not be mistaken for the Crested
Grebe or vice versa.
Taenia rigosa Krettt, 1873
Trans, Ent. Sac. N.S.W. 2; 223-4.
Now Acoelus hedlyi (Kreflt, 1873) Johnston,
1912b, Neotype AHC §339-40, from Himantupuy
leucocephalus, Hunter River, N.S.W., collector G.
Krefft, date unknown,
Note: Johnston tound the original material so dam-
aged as to be useless, but was able to compare it
with fresh material from the same host in South Aus-
tralia by J. B, Cleland. The armatuye of the cirrus
sac of both lots of material assisted in establishing
their identity.
Tholophyllacus johnston’ Mackiewicz & Blair, 1980
Proc. Helm. Soc, Wash. 47 (2): 172-4.
Paratypes V1893-4, from Yundanus glencoensis,
Ross R, near Townsville, Old., collectors probably
the authors, date unknown.
Triplotaena fimbriata Beveridge, 1976
Aust. J, Zool, Suppl, Ser. 44; 69-71.
Holotype V800, paratype V801, from Macropiis
gigdnteus, Nebo, Qld., collector A, Glassop,
17/8/73.
Triplotaenia undosa Beveridge, 1976
Aust. J. Zool. Suppl. Ser. 44: 73-5,
Holotype V802, paratype V803, AHC 8962, trom
Wallabia hicoler, Dattmouth, Vic., collector 1.
Beveridge, 22/1/74,
Valipera parvitaeniunca Baer & Bona, 1960
Boll. Inst, Mus. Zool. Torino & (4): 9.
Now Baerbania p. parvitaeniunea (Bacr & Boni,
400
1960), 1975, Syntype AHC $308, from Egrerta
sacra, Masthead Is., Qld,, collector T, H,. Johnston,
1917.
Zasteropicola clelandi Johnston, 1912a
Mem, Qid. Mus. 1: 214-5.
Cotypes AHC S84, S464, fram Zosleraps ceeeru-
lescens, neighbourhood of Sydney, N.S.W., collectors
J. B. Cleland, J, O. Heimrich and T. H. Johnson,
dates unknown,
REC. 8. AUST. MUS. i8 (21): 493-501,
Atay, 1984
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
T would Jike to thank Mrs. P. M, Thomas (Maw-
son), Miss L. M. Angel and Dr. 5. J. Edmonds
without. whose adyice and assistance these lists of
helminth types could nol have been prepared. This
wark was funded by an Australian Biological Re-
sources Study grant to the South Australian Museum.
REFERENCES
BAER, J. G. 1927. Monographie des cestodes de la famille
des Anoplocephalidae, Bull, Biol, Pr. Bele, Suppl. 10,
BAER, J. G., and BONA, F. 1960_ Révision des Cestodes
Dilepididae Fuhrm, 1907 des Ardeiformes. Note
préliminaire.. Boll. Inst, Mus, Ze0l, Torino 6(4): 1-53,
BEVERIDGE, t. 1975. On two new dayaineid cestodes from
Australian marsupials. J. Helniinthol., 49: 129-136.
BEVERIDGE, 1. 1976. A taxonomic revision of the Ano-
placephalidue (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea) of Austra-
lian marsupials, Aust, J. Zoel, Suppl. Ser, 44; 1-110,
BBEVERIDGE, 1. 1977. On two new linstowiid coxtodes
Spit. ante tad dasyurid marsupials. J. Melniinthel.
REVERIDGE, 1, 1978. Progamorcenia ruficola sp. n. (Ces-
toda: Anoplocephalidac) from the Red Kangaroo,
Macropus rufus (Marsupalia): J. Purusital. 64 (2):
273-6.
BEVERIDGE, f. 1980a, Eehidnatienia tachygtoss? (Sohn-
ston) gen. ct comb. nov. (Anoplocephalatsa: Linsta-
Wiidae) from jhe monotreme Tachyglassus uculeatus
Shaw in Australia. /. Helminthol, 54: 129-34.
BEVERIDGE, I. i980b. Progamoraenia Nybelin (Cestoda:
Anoplocephalidac): new species, redescriplions und
nee host records. Trans. R. See. 8. Aust, 104 (4): 67-
q
79.
BEVERIDGE, I[., and BARKER, I. K, 1975. Acuariid,
capillariid and hymenolepidid parasites of the dasyurid
marsupial Aniechinus stnartii Macleay, 1841, Irom
south eastern Australia. J. Aelminthal. 49; 211-27.
BEVERLDGE, T., und THOMPSON, R. ©. A. 1979. The
anoplocephalid cestode parasites of the spectacled hare-
wallaby, Lavorchestes conspicillatus Gould, 1842
(Marauetalla- Macrapodidac). J. Helinintiml. 53:
153-60.
BLAIR, DO. 197k. Polyonchabothrium ycleropagivs n. Sp,
(Cestoda: Pseudopyllidea) from the Australian osteo-
flossid fish Seleropages leichardti Gunther, J. Hel-
minthal. SZ (2): 147-53.
BONA, F. 1975. Etude critique ct taxonomique des Dile-
pididae Fuhrm., 1907 (Cestoda) parasites des Civenii-
formes: considérations sur la spécificite et la spéciation.
lial, J. Zoal. Monograph. 1: 1-750.
EDMONDS, 8. J. 1957a Acanthocephala. BANZARE Rop.
Ser, B. 6 (5) 93-8.
EDMONDS, S. J. 1957b. Australian Acanthocephala No.
10. Trans, R. Soc. S.A, 80> 76-80,
EDMONDS, S. J. 1971- Australiin Acanthocephala No, 13:
three new species. Trans. R. Sac. S. Aust, 95 (2):
55-60,
EDMONDS, S. J. 1973. Australian Acanthocephala No, 14;
On two new species af Pararhadinoriiynchus, ane new.
Trans. R. Soc. S, Aust, 97 (1), 19-21,
GOLVAN, Y-J, 1956. Acanthocephales u'Olseaux. Tyol-
sieme note. Reévision des especes eurupéenes de la
sous-lamille des Plagiorhynchinae Meyer 1931 (Poly-
morphidae), Ann, Parastel, Hum, Comp. 31 (4):
350-84,
GOLVAN, Y-). 1960. Le Phylum des Acanthocephala.
Troisieme note. Le Classe des Palaeacanthocephala
Meyer 1931, AAW Parasitol. Hum. Comp. 35 (1-2):
138-65, 350-86, 575-93, 713-23,
JOHNSTON, T. H. 1909. On a new reptilian cestode.
Proc. R. Sov. N.S.W. 43: 103-16,
JOHNSTON, T, H. 1911a. The Entozoa of Monotremata
und Australian Marsupislia. Proc. Linn. Soe. NSW.
36 (1): 47-57,
JOHNSTON, H. 1911b. Proteocuphalus gallardi a new
cestode from the black smuke. ava. Ole Abus. 10:
1-8.
JOHNSTON, T. WH. (91ic. New species of Avian Cestades,
Proc, Linn. Soc, NSW. 36 (1) S880,
JOHNSTON, T. H. 1912a. New Species of cestodes from
Australian birds. Aten. Old. Muy. Vs 211-18.
TOHNSTON, T. WY. 19126. On a reexamination of the
types of Krefft's species of Cestoda in The Australian
Museum. Ree, Aust, Mus. 9 (1): 1-35,
JOHNSTON, T. H. 1912c Notes on some Entozoa, Prac.
R. Sac, Old. 24+ 63-91.
JOHNSTON, YT. Ho 1913. Cestoda and Acanthocephala,
Rep. frist, Trop. Med. 1911. 75-96,
JOHNSTON, T. H. 1914 Some new Queensland endo-
parasites. Proc. R. Soc. Old, 26: 76-84,
JOHNSTON, T, H, 1916. Helminthologicul Notes, (fem.
Old. Nfuy. 5: 186-96.
JOHNSTON, T. AH. 1924. An Austriliun curyophilaeid
cestode, Proc, Linn, Soe, NSW, 49 (4): 339-47,
JOHNSTON, T. H. 1937. Entozoa from the Australian
Hair Seal. Proc. Linn, Soe. NSM. @2 (1-2): 9-16,
JOHNSTON, T. H.. and BEST. E. W. 1937. Acantho-
cephala, A a FE TY 1-14 Rep. Ser. C Zoal, Bor 10
(2) 5-20,
JOHNSTON, T. H., and BRST, F, W. 1942, Australian
Acunthocephala No. 3. Tra, Re Seo. 3. Aas. 66 (2):
250-4.
JOHNSTON, T. H., and BEST, E, W, 1943, Australian
Acanthocephala No, 4. Trans, R. Soe. 8, Aust, &7 (2);
226-30.
JOHNSTON, T. H, and CLARK, H. G. 1948a. Cestodes
from Avstralign birds 1. Pelicans. Trans. R, Sac. 8.
Asi, 72 (1): 77-82,
JOHNSTON, T. H., and CLARK, H, G. 1948b, A new
cestode, Ruillietina (R-) leipoae, from the Mallee Hen,
Rec, §, Alist, Mus, 9 (1): 87-91,
IOHNSTON, T. H,, and EBMONDS, 5, J. 1947, Australian
Acanthocephala No. 5. Trans, Ry Soc, So Aust, 71
(1): 13-19.
JOHNSTON, T, H., and EDMONDS, &. J. 1947. Austra-
lian Acanthocephala No, 6. Rec, 8. fust. Muy, &
(4) > 555-62.
JOHNSTON, 'T. H., und EDMONDS, S. 1. 1948. Austra-
lian Acanthocephala No. 7 Trans. R. Soe. 8. Aust.
72. (1): 69-76,
JOHNSTON, T. H., and EDMONDS, 8, J. 1951, Austra-
lian Acanthoeephala No. 8. Trans, Ke Soe, §. Aust. 74
(1) LS,
IOHNSTON, T. H., and MUIRHEAD, N, G. 1950. Some
Australian caryophyllacid cestodes. Ree, S$, fisn Mie
9 (3). 339-48.
KREFFT, G., (873. On Australian Butozoa Trans, Ent.
Soc, NSA, 2) 206-32.
LEWIS, R, C,, 1914, On two new species of tapeworms from
the stomach and small intestine of a wallaby Lugar
chestes conspicidlutas trom Hermite Island, Monte
Bello Islands, Proc, Zool. Soc. Lond. 1914: 419-33.
HELMINTH TYPE-SPECIMENS II 501
MACKIEWICZ, J. S., and BLAIR, D. 1978. Balanotae-
niidae fam. n. and Balanotaenia newguinensis sp. n.
(Cestoidea; Caryophyllidea) from Tandanus (Siluri-
formes: Plotosidae) in New Guinea. J. Helminthol.
§2: 199-203.
MACKITEWICZ, J. S., and BLAIR, D. 1980. Caryoaustra-
lus gen. n. and Tholophyllaeus gen. n. (Lytocestidae)
and other Caryophyllid cestodes from Tandanus spp.
(Siluriformes) in Australia. Proc, Helminthol. Soc.
Wash, 47 (2): 168-78.
MOLIN, R. 1858. Prospectus helminthrum quae in parte
seconda prodromi faunae helminthologicae venetae
continentur. Sitzber. K. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-
Naturw. K1 30: 141.
NYBELIN, O. 1917. Australiche Cestoden. Results of Dr
E. Mjéberg’s Swedish Scientific Expeditions to Aus-
tralia, 1910-1913. Kungl. Svenska Vetensakadiemiens
Handlingar 52: 1-48.
PRUDHOE, 8S. 1969. Cestodes from fish, birds and whales.
BANZARE Rep. Ser. B (Zool, Bot.) 8 (9): 171-93.
SCHMIDT, G. D, 1972. Cyclophyllidean cestodes of Aus-
tralian birds with three new species. J. Parasitol. 58
(6): 1085-94,
SCHMIDT, G. D., and KUNTZ, R. E. 1967. Revision of
the Porrorchinae (Acanthocephala: Plagiorhynchidae )
with descriptions of two new genera and three new
species. J. Parasitol. 53 (1): 130-41.
SCHMIDT, G. D., and KUNTZ, R. E. 1977. Revision of
Mediorhynchus Van Cleave, 1916 with a key to
species. J. Parasitol. 63 (3): 500-07.
VAN CLEAVE, H. J., and LINCICOME D. R. 1939.
On a new genus and species of Rhadinorhynchidae.
Parasitology 31: 413-6.
WEDL, K. 1855. Helminthologische Notizen. Sitz-ber.
Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math—Naturwiss Kl., Abt. I 16:
371-95.
WILLIAMS, H. H. 1964. Some new and little known
cestodes from Australian elasmobranchs with a_ brief
discussion on their possible use in problems of host
taxonomy. Parasitology 54: 1737-48.
YAMAGUTI, S. 1935. Studies in the helminth fauna of
Japan. Part 8. Acanthocephala I. Jap, J, Zool, 6 (2):
277-78.
YAMAGUTI, S. 1959. Systema Helminthum II. The
Cestodes of Vertebrates. Interscience, New York. __
ZSCHOKKE, F. 1907. Monezia diaphana n. sp. Ein
weiterer Beitrag zur kenntnis der Cestoden aplacen-
taler Saugetiere. Centralbl. Bakt. 44 (3): 261-4.
HELMINTH TYPE-SPECIMENS IN THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM
HI. TREMATODA
BY LESLEY R. SMALES
Summary
Type-specimens of 13 species of Monogenea and 70 species of Digenea are catalogued. All are
from Australian or Antarctic hosts. Trematode species are listed alphabetically, according to the
original name of the genus, under either Monogenea or Digenea. Where a name change has
occurred the most recent name is included. The hosts are given under the name recorded by the
author.
HELMINTH TYPE-SPECIMENS IN THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM
il. TREMATODA
by
LESLEY R. SMALES*
South Australian Muscum, Adelaide, South Australia 5000
ABSTRACT
SMALES, L. R.. 1983. Helminth type-specimens in the
South Australian Museum, UI. Trematoda, Ree, S,
Ausi, Muy. 1B (22): 503-511,
‘Type-specimens of 13 species of Monogenea and
70 species of Digenea are catalogued. All are from
Australian or Antarctic hosts, Trematode species are
listed alphabetically, according to the original name
of the genus, under either Monogenea or Digenea.
Where a name change has occurred the most recent
name is included. The hosts are given under the
name recorded by the author.
INTRODUCTION
This is the third and final paper of a series listing
the Helminth Types held by the South Australian
Museum and the Australian Helminthological Col-
lection, currently housed in the Museum. There is
also a substantial collection of larval material for
which the adult has not yet been described. All the
specimens described have been collected from Aus-
tralian or Antarctic hosts.
The species are listed in alphabetical order under
the genus to which they were first assigned. Where a
tame change has occurred the most recent authori-
tative name is, given. Host-species names are those
used in the original descriptions.
The earliest material registered is that assembled
by T. H. Johnston who was as actively interested in
the trematodes as he was in the other helminth
groups. The group of parasitologists he established
at Adelaide University, including L. M. Angel, now
Honorary Associate of the South Australian Mus-
cum and still working in the field, provided a sig-
nificant contribution to knowledge of the Australian
trematodes, Other Australian trematologists are now
depositing type material at the Museum,
Registration numbers starting with V_ indicate
material held in the South Australian Museum, those
starting with AHC, material in the Australian Hel-
minthological Collection. Unless otherwise stated
the name Johnston refers to T. H. Johnston. The
following abbreviations were used in the text:
BANZARE = British, Australia and New Zealand
Antarctic Research Expedition, 1929-31; AHC =
* Present address: Gippsland Institute of Advanced Educa-
tion, P,O. Box 42, Churchill, Victoria 3845,
Australian Helminthological Collection; SAM =
South Ausiralian Museum; N.T. — Norther Ter-
ritory; N.S-W. = New South Wales; Old. — Queens-
Jand; S.A, = South Australia; Tas. — Tasmania:
Vic, = Victoria; W.A, = Western Australia,
CLASS TREMATODA
SUB-CLASS MONOGENEA
Anoplodiscus australis Johnston, 1930
Aust, J. Exp, Biol. Med. Sci, 7; 108-12.
Holotype V8 from the fin of Sparus australis, Sydney
Harbour, N.S.W., collector §. J, Johnston, date un-
known.
Now Anoplocotyle ausiralis (Johnston, 1930) Pa-
lombi, 1943,
Calicotyle australis Johnston, 1934.
Aust. J, Exp, Biol, Med, Sei. 12: 25-8,
Holotype V9 probably from the gills of Trygondr-
rhina fasciata, Glenelg, S.A., collector T. H. John-
ston, date unknown,
Diplasicotyle johnstoni Sandars, 1944
Trans, R, Soc. §. Aust, 68 (1): 77-81.
Types V850-1 from gills of Agonastomus forsteri,
Mandurah, Bunbury, W.A., collector probably the
author, 1943,
Note: Sandars did not specify a type Jocality for each
species, but some of the type slides have a locality
written in her handwriting.
Gonoplasius carangis Sandars, 1944
Trans. R. Soc, S. Aust. 68 (1): 75-7.
Holotype V848 from the gills of Caranx georgianus,
North Beach, Rockingham, W.A., collector probably
the author, 11/6/43,
Microcotyle agonostomi Sandars, 1945
JR. Soe, W. Aust. 29: 108-12.
Holotype V846 from the gills of Agenostemus for-
steri, Swan R., Mandurah, Bunbury, Denmark, Al-
bany, W.A., collector probably the author, 1942.
Microeotyle arripis Sandars, 1945
J. R. Soe. W, Aust, 29: 114-8,
Holotype V845 from the gills of 4rripis trutta, North
Beach, Swan River, Mandurah, Bunbury, Busselton,
Albany, Woodman’s Point, Scarborough, Whitfords
Beach, W.A., collector probahly the author,
18/6/42,
504 REC, 8. AUST. MUS. 18 (22); 503-511,
Microcotyle gerres Sandars, 1944
Trans. R. Soc. §. Aust. 68 (1): 67-8,
Holotype V843 from gills of Gerrey ovatus, Man-
durah, W.A,., collector probably the author,
14/4/43,
Microcatyle helotes Sandars, 1944
Trans, R. Soc. S, Aust. 68 (1): 72-4.
Coatypes V841 from the gills of Helotes sexlineatus,
Safety Bay, W.A., collector probably the author,
20/5/43.
Microecetyle odacis Sandars, 1945
J. R. Soc. W. Aust. 29: 123-6.
Holotype V842 from the gills of Odar semifasciatus,
Albany, W.A., collector probably the author, April
1941,
Micrecetyle parasillaginae Sandars, 1945
J. R. Sac. W. Aust. 29; 112-4.
Holotype V844 from the gills of Sillaginedes pune-
talus, Albany, W.A., collector probably the author,
14/5/42.
Microcetyle pentapodi Sandars, 1944
Trans, R, Sac, 8. Aust, 68 (1); 69-70,
Holotype V839 from the gills of Pentapodus milii,
Rockingham, W.A., collector probably the author,
26/4/43.
Microcetyle scorpis Sandars, 1944
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 68 (1): 71-2.
Holotype V840 from the gills of Scorpis aequipinnis,
Safety Bay, W,A., collector probably the author,
14/1/43,
Microcotyle temnodontis Sandars, 1945
JR. Soc, W, Aust, 29; 119-23.
Cotypes V&47 from the gills of Temonodon saliator,
Bunbury, W.A., collector probably the author,
2/4/42.
SUB-CLASS DIGENEA
Apatemon (Apaiemon) vitelliresiduus Dubois &
Angel, 1972
Trans. R. Soc. Aust. 96 (4): 199-201,
Holotype V1068 from the intestine of Biziira lobata,
Purnong and Caloot, Murray R., 5S.A., collector
P. M. Mawson, 20/6/58,
Paratypes V1069, three specimens on the same slide
as the holotype.
Bancrofirema neocerotodi Angel, 1966
J, Parasitol, 52 (6): 1058-61.
Holotype V955 from the digestive tract of Neocero-
todus forsteri, Qld., collector T. L. Bancroft,
January 1911.
Paratypes. V956-8, juveniles, one sectioned,
May, 1984
Brachylecithum dacelonis Angel & Pearson, 1977
Trans, R. Soe. S. Aust. 101 (5): 122,
Holotype V89 from the liver of Dacelo novae-
euineae, Bridgewater, $.A., collector P. M. Mawson,
July 1973.
Paratypes V90, 91; AHC S15.
Brachylecithum hydromyos Angel & Pearson, 1977
Trans. R. Soc. 8S. Aust. 101 (5); 121,
Holotype V82 from the pancreatic ducts of
Hydromys chrysogaster, Lily Ck., Cairns, Old,, col-
lector C, M, Weaver, 14/2/75.
Paratypes V83, 84; AHC S14,
Brachylectthum insulare Angel & Pearson, 1977
Trans. R. Soe. 8. Aust. 101 (5): 119-21,
Holotype V76 from gall bladder and bile ducts of
Rattus fuscipes, Pearson Is., $.A., collector P. E,
Hornsby, date unknown,
Paratypes V77, 78, 79; AHC 82,
Brachylecithum latius Angel & Pearson, 1977
Trans. R, Soc, §. Aust. 101 (5): 123-4.
Holotype V102 from the gall bladder of Cracticus
tarquatus, Cowell, S.A., collector P. M. Mawson,
27/5/65,
Paratypes V103-5; AHC 824-6.
Brachylecithum pedargi Angel & Pearson, 1977
Trans. R. Soc. 8S. Aust. WA (5): 212-3,
Holotype V92 from the bile ducts of Podargus
strigoides, Moggill, Qld., collector J, C. Pearson,
6/11/62,
Paratypes V103-5; AHC $20,
Burnellus trichofurcatus Angel, 1971
Parasitology 62; 375-84.
Holotype V977 from the intestine of Tandanus tan-
danus, Murray R., S.A., collector T. H, Johnston,
L. M, Angel, dates unknown,
Paratypes V978-987, other paratype material in
AHC,
Cercariaze V930, V2772, Sporocysts Y931 as used
in the original descriptions of the juvenile stages of
the life cycle by Johnston & Angel (1940a).
Cardiacephaloides ovicerpus Dubois & Angel, 1972
Trans. R. Soe. S. Aust, 96 (4); 204.
Holotype V1070 from the intestine of an unknown
host, no collection data, from SAM.
Paratypes V1071 including sectioned material.
Catatropiy gallinule Johnston, 1928
Rec. S. Aust. Mus, 4 (1); 135-8,
Holotype V5 from the caecum of Gallinula tene-
brosa, Adelaide, S.A., collector probably T. H,
Johnston, 1926.
Cetiotrrema crassum Manter, 1970
Trans, R. Soc. 8. Aust. 94; 147-50,
HELMINTH TYPE-SPECIMENS III
Holotype V1004 from the ureter of Thunnys shynnis
muceoyil, East Bass Strait and Kangaroo Is., $.A,,
collected by CSTRO, 1939,
Ceelomotrema antichinomes Angel, 1970
Aust. J. Zool, 18: 119-24,
Holoiype V974, from the body cavity of Ante-
chinomys spenceri, Sandringham Stn. near Bedourie,
Old., collectors P. Woolley & M. Stanley, caught
18/6/68, died 22/10/68.
Paratypes V975, 976 including sectioned material
and AHC.
Cetylurus (Coetylurus) magneacetabulus Dubois &
Angel, 1972
Trans. R, Soc. §, Aust, 96 (4); 204-5.
Holotype V1072 from the lower intestine of Cygnus
atraius, Tatlem Bend, S.A., collector T. H, John-
ston, 25/10/45,
Paratypes V1072 (six on same slide as holotype),
V1073.
Cyclocoelum jaenschi Johnston & Simpson, 1940a
Trans, R, Soc, 8. Aust, 64 (2); 273-8.
Holotype V949 from the abdominal air sacs of Podi-
ceps novaelhollandiae, Tailem Bend, §.A., collectors
G. & F. Jaensch, August 1937,
Cercariaeum jaenschi Cercariae V948 as used in the
original descriptions of the juvenile stages of the
life cycle,
Note; Although a type-host is not designated in the
original description the type-slide las host data in
T_H. Johnston's handwriting.
Cylindratrema eygni Angel, 1973
Int. J. Parasitol. 3; 853-7,
Holotype V1119 from the caecum of Cygnus atratus,
Tailem Bend, S.A., collector T. H. Johnston,
20/8/51.
Diplostomum murrayense Johnston & Angel, 1941a
Trans, R, Soc, 8. Aust, 65 (1): 140-4,
Holotype V952 from the digestive tract of Childonias
leucopareia, Tailem Bend, S.A., collector G, & F.
Jaensch & L, Ellis, 7/2/40.
Paratypes V944.
Cercaria murrayensis Johnston & Cleland, 1938
Cercariae V941-2, V2768, Diplostomulum V943,
as used in the original descriptions of the juvenile
stages of the life cycle.
Diplostomuni (Diplostemum) paryulum Duhois &
Angel, 1972
Trans, R, Soc. 8, Aust. 96 (4); 206-8,
Holotype V1LO74 from the intestine of Hydroprogne
easpia, Tailem Bend, $.A., collector T. H. John-
ston, December 1939.
Paratypes V1074 (three on same slide as holotype),
VILO75,
S05
Dolichepera macalpini Nicoll, 1914
Parasitology & (4): 333-50,
From Netechis scuta(us and Denisonia superba, col-
lected in N.S.W., S.A., Vic. and Tas., now Dolicho-
peroidey macalpini (Nicoll, 1914) Johnston & Angel
(1940b).
Cereariae V924-5, metacercariae V926, sporocysts
V923, and sections of infected Ameria pyrainidata
V927 as used in the original descriptions of the
juvenile stages of the life cycle.
Derogenes johnstoni Prudhoe & Bray, 1973
BANZARE Rep, Ser. B 8 (10); 221-2,
Catypes V563 from Artedidrace shackeltoni (site in
host not known), 65°48'S, 53° 16, collector T. H.
Johnston, 24/1/30,
Note; Prudhoe & Bray (1973) did not specify type
host and type locality or designate a holotype for
any of the trematodes collected by T. H. Johnston
during BANZARE.
Echinochasmus pelecani Johnston & Simpson, 1944b
Trans R, Soc, 8. Aust, 6B (1): 113-9.
Syntypes V1059 trom the small intestine af Pele-
canus conspicillatus, Tailem Bend, S.A., collectors
G, & B. Jaensch & L, Ellis on several occasions
between 1938-44,
Cercariae V939, V2806, cysts and redia V2805,
metacercariae V940, infected Gamhusia ajfinus
V2807 as used in the original description of the
juvenile stages of the life cycle,
Note; Johnston & Simpson (1944) considered that
a more detailed description of . mordax Looss,
1899 would show that &. pelecani was a synonym
of that species. However Yamaguti (1971) still tists
E. pelecani separately with the note that i is
probably a synonym of &. mordax.
Echinaparyphium ellist Johnston & Angel, 1949
Ree. §, Aust. Mus. 9 (2): 247-54.
Type adult V902 from the duodenum of Chenepts
atraius, Tailem Bend, S.A., collectors Messrs
Jaensch & Ellis, April 1947,
Cercaria ellisi Johnston & Simpson, 1944a
Cercariae V903, 904, metacercariae V9OS, redia and
eercariae V906 as used in the original descriptions
of the juvenile stages of the life cycle.
Echineparyphium hydromyos Angel, 1967
Parasitology 57: 19-30.
Holotype V57 from the intestine of Alvdronrys
chrysegaster, Vailem Bend, S.A., collector L. M,
Angcl, December 1959,
Paratypes V58.
Cereariae fram Planorbis isingi V60, cysts from tad-
poles and Lenameria sp. V59 as used in the original
descriptions of the juvenile stages of the life cycle.
506
Echinosioma australe Johnston, 1928
Rec. S. Aust. Mus, 4 (1): 138-40,
Holotype V6 from the caecum of Gallinula tene-
brosa, Adelaide, $.A., probably collected by T. H.
Johnston, 1926.
Echinestama hancrefti Johnston, 1928
Rec. S. Aust. Mus, 4 (1) 140-2,
Holotype V7 from the intestine of Gallinula tene-
brosa, Burnett R., Eidsvold, Old,, collector T, L.
Bancroft, 29/9/19,
Folivtvema jecoris Blair, 1981
Aust. J. Zool, Suppl. Ser. 81: 31-2.
Holotype V1963 from the gallbladder and bile ducts
of Dugong dugon, Daru, Gulf of Papua, collectors
‘Dugong Project’ Wildlife Diy. Dept. Lands and
Environment, Papua New Guinea, 11/7/78.
Paratypes V1964,
Faredifix clavata Blair, 1981
Aust. J. Zool, Suppl. Ser, 81+ 41-3.
Holotype V1973 from large abscesses in the wall of
the ileum of Dugong dugen, Mornington Is,, Old,,
collected by aboriginals for food, 11/11/76.
Paratypes V1974-6 including sectioned material.
Galactosxemum angelae Pearson, 1973
Phil, Trans, R. Soc. Lond. B 266 (879); 361,
From the smal! intestine of Hydropragne caspia,
Port R., S.A., collector unknown, September 1928,
donated by L. M. Angel.
Paratypes V 1029.
Galactesomum bearupi Pearson, 1973
Phil. Trans. R. Soc, Lond, B 266 (879): 368.
From the small intestine of Aydroprogne caypia,
Townsville, Qld., collector A, J, Bearup, 20/8/68.
Paratypes V1030.
Galactosomum renincela Pearson, 1973
Phil, Trans, R. Soe. Lond. B 266 (879): 409.
From the renal ureter of Puffinus pacificus, Heron
Is,, Old, collector probably the author, 6/3/68.
Paratypes VLO31.
Galactosomum sinuilactis Pearson, 1973
Phil, Trans, R, Soc, Lond, B 266 (879): 415,
From the bursa of Phalacrocerax varius, Moreton
Bay, Qld., collectors R. Groom & R,. Greenhill,
25/7/69,
Paratypes V 1032.
Haerator caperatus Blair, 1981
Aust. J, Zool. Suppl. Ser. 81: 44-7.
Holotype V1977 from the ileum of Dugong dugon,
Mornington Is,, Qld., collected for food by abori-
ginals, 2/8/78.
Paratypes V1978-1 including sectioned material.
Haplorchis parapumilio Pearson & Ow-Yang, 1982
S-E Asian J. Trop. Med. Pub, Health 13: 37.
REC. S. AUST. MUS. 18 (22): 503-511
Muy, 1984
From Phalacrocerax pygmaeus, trom the small intes-
tine, Pulan Rambut, Jakarta Bay, Java, collector D,
Supriadi, 23/6/77.
Paratype V2752.
Haplorchis parayanissimus Pearson & Ow-Yang,
1982
S-E Asian J. Trop. Med: Pub, Health 13: 50.
From Nycticorax calendonicus, from the lower small
intestiné, Brisbane Botanic Gdns. Old.. collector
J, C. Pearson, 8/1/62.
Paratype V2752,
Harveytrema bisculatum Kruse, 1979a
J, Parasitol. 63 (6): 918-20,
Holotype V1677 from the intestine of Achoerodus
gouldi, Pearson Ts., S.A., collector P. M. Mawson,
February 1960.
Paratype V1678 (sectioned), AHC $290,
Helicametra scorpaenae Prudhoe & Bray, 1973
BANZARE Ren. Ser. B 8 (10): 213,
Cotypes V458-9, from Scorpaena truenta, 42° 40'S,
148° 27° 30”F off Maria 1, Tas,, collector T. H.
Johnston, 23/3/31.
Hemistomum infermedium §. J. Johnston, 1904
Proc, Linn, Soe, NSW, 1904; 109-110.
now 4 patemon intermedium (S, J, Johnston, 1904)
T. H, Johnston & Angel, 1951b,
Substitute type V8&70 from the duodenum of Chenv-
pis atrata, Duckmaloi R,, N,S,W,, collector T, H.
Johnston,
Cercaria lessont V872-3, 875 metacercariae V874,
876, cysts V877 as used in the original description
of the juvenile stages of the life cycle by Johnston
& Beckwith, 1947a,
Nate; The slide deposited in SAM is designated
“substitute type” in T. El. Johnston's handwriting
and is from material collected at Tailem Bend, S.A.
Attempts by Johnston & Angel, 1951b, to trace
the Original material, were unsuccessful.
Heterophyes bitequatus Pearson & Pearson, 1983
Sarawak Mus, J. 29: 171-189,
From Sternd bergii, site in host not given, Buntal,
Sarawak, collector Guan anak Sureng, 15/12/76.
Paratypes V2607.
Heterophiyes chini Pearson & Pearson, 1983
Sarawak Mus. J, 29: 171-189,
From Sterna bergti, site in host nat given, Buntal,
Sarawak, collector Guan anak Sureng, 15/12/76.
Paratypes V26(05-06,
lyoparerchis tandani Johnston, 1927
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. S41: 129-33,
Lectotype V3089 from the gas bladder of Tandanus
randanus, Qld., collectors ‘T, L, Bancroft & M, J.
Mackerras, date unknown,
HELMINTH TYPE-SPECIMENS IL
Syntypes V3090.
Note: This material was found in T. H. Johoston’s
slide collection. The labels indicated that it must
have been the original material, L, M. Angel desig-
nated the slides lectotype and syntypes.
Lahicola elongata Blair, 1979
Ann. Parasitol. Hum. Camp. 54 (5): 521-6,
Holotype V1679 from the upper Jip of Duong
dugen, accidentally drowned in nets used by shark-
meshing contractors and given to the dugong
research group, James Cook University, Townsville,
Old,
Paratypes V1680-4 including sectioned material.
Lankatrema minutunt Blair, 1981
Aust. J, Zool. Suppl. Ser. 81: 23-4,
Holotype V1954 from cardiac glands of the stomach
of Dugeng dugon collected for food by aboriginals,
Mornington Is., Gulf of Carpentaria, 4/8/75,
Paratypes V1946-8 including sectioned material.
Lankatrema micrecotyle Blair, 1981
Aust, J, Zool, Suppl. Ser. 81; 24-7.
Holotype V1949 from the wall of the ileum of
Dugong dugen, collected for foad by aboriginals,
Mornington Is., Guif of Carpentaria, 2/8/78.
Paratypes V1950-3 including sectioned material.
Lankalrema macrecotyle Blair, 1981
Aust, J. Zoal. Suppl. Ser. 81; 27-8,
Holotype V1954 from the wall of the ileum of
Dugong dugon, collected for food by abotriginals,
Mornington Is., Gulf of Carpentaria, 2/8/78.
Paratypes V1955-6 including sectioned material.
Lankatremoides gardneri Blair, 1981
Aust, J, Zool, Suppl, Ser. 81; 29-31,
Holotype V1957 from pancreatic ducis of Dugong
dugon, collected for food by Torres Strait Islanders,
Thursday Is., Old., 3/11/76.
Paratypes V1958-62 including sectioned material.
Lecithaster australis Prudhoe & Bray, 1973
BANZARE Rep. Ser. B 8 (10): 218.
Cotypes V503-21, site in host not given, from Noto-
thenia spp, and three other hosts, near head of
Bras Bossitre, Kerguelen and cight other localities,
callector T. H. Johnston, 20/21/29,
Syntypes V735.
Lepecreadium angelae Kruse, 1981)
Prac. Helm. Sac. Wash. 48: 195-97,
From Scerpiy geargianus, Pt Willunga, S.A., col-
lector probably ‘Tl, H, Johnston, February, 1934.
Paratypes V2753-64,
Leuehochloridium australiense Johnston & Simpson,
1940b
Trans. R, Soc. 8. Aust. 64 (1): 119-24,
Holotype V960 from the cloaca of Pomutostomues
superciliosus, Elwomple, near Tailem Bend, $.A.,
S07
collector F, Jaensch, August 1938.
Cereariae V959 as used in the original description
of the juvenile stages by Johnston & Cleland, 1938.
CLutctirema ailuroedi Angel & Pearson, 1977
Trany. R. Soc, 8. Ausi, WA (5); 127-9.
Holotype V108 from bile duct and mouth of gall
bladder of Ailuroedis crasyirostris, Mt Glorious,
Old., collector K, E, Webber, 29/10/62.
Paratypes V109-11; AHC $28,
Macropoirema pertinax Blair, Beveridge & Speare,
1979
Ann, Parasitol, 54 (6); 585-92,
Holotype V1831 (serial sections) from the cuecum
of Macropus agilis, Yabulu, Qld., collector 1, Beve-
ridge, 20/8/78.
Paratypes V1832-6 including sectioned material,
Mawsonotrema éudyptulue Angel, 1973
Int, J. Parasitol. 3: 857-9,
Holotype V1120 from ducts of liver of Eudyplula
minor, Brighton Beach, S.A., collector, from the
Instilute of Medical and Veterinary Science, S.A.,
11/7/72.
Paratypes V1121 including sectioned material; AHC
$33-5,
Mesoxtephanus neophocae Dubois & Angel, 1976
Bull. Soe, Neuchat. Sci, Nat, 99; 29-32,
Holotype V75 from intestine of Neophaca cinerea,
Gulf St Vincent, 8.A., collector G. Dubois, 29/1/75.
Paratypes, four specimens on same slide as holo-
type, AHC §31, $32,
Monostephanostamun manteri Kruse, 1979b
J. Parasitel, 65 (@): 921-3.
Holotype V1911 from intestine of Arripis gear-
giqnus, Port Willunga, S.A, (February, 1934), Gulf
St Vineent, S.A, (April, 1964), collectors T. Hi,
Johnston, and from the Adelaide Fish Market,
Paratype V1912; AHC $306.
Neodiplostomum intermedinm Pearson, 1959
Parasitology 49 (1 & 2); 111-9.
From small intestine of Rarrus assimilis, edge of ram
forest, Mt Glorious, Qld., collector probably the
author, 1956-7.
Paratypes V836-8.
Neodiplostomum (Neodiplostomum) lanceolatum
Dubois & Angel, 1972
Trans. R, Soc, §, Aust. 96 (4): 209-10,
Holotype V1076 from intestine of Ninex noevac-
seclandiae, Adelaide, S.A., collector P. M. Mawson,
April 1959,
Paratypes Y1077, four specimens on same slide “as
holotype.
Nevdiplostomunr (Trilaborchidiplosromum) <lialolt
Dubois & Angel, 1972
S08
Trans. R. Soc. §. Aust, 96 (4); 210-2,
Holotype V1078, site in host unknown, from Sar-
eophiluy Marrisii, Tas., collector B. Munday, October
1969,
Neolepidapedon antarclicus Prudhoe & Bray, 1973
BANZARE Rep. Ser. B 8 (10): 204-5.
Cotypes V406-9 [rom pyloric caeca of Corypliae-
nodes whiiwoni, 66° 218, 58° SO'R., collector T, H.
Johnston, 7/1/30,
Neolepidapedon dubius Prudhoe & Bray, 1973
BANZARE Rep. Ser. B 8 (10): 205-6,
Cotypes V410-12, V732 fram pyloric caeca of Cory-
phaenoides whitsoni, 66" 218, 58° SOE, collector
T, H. Johnston, 7/1/30.
Nevlepidapedon helicoleni Prudhoe & Bray, 1973
BANZARE Rep, Ser. B 8 (10): 208.
Cotypes V415-24, site in host unknown, from Heli-
colenis percoides and Scorpaena cruenta, 42° 40'S,
148° 27° 30°F, off Maria Is,, Tus., collector T. H.
Johnston, 23/3/31,
Neolepidapedon trematoni Prudhoe & Bray, 1973
BANZARE Rep, Ser. B 8 (101): 206,
Cotypes V413-7, site in host unknown, collected
during AAE 1911, hosts and localities Trematamus
hansonji 65° 42°8, 92° 10'E. Tremaronis scott
65° 20'S, 95° 27'E, Austrolycichthys brachycephalus
65° 6S, 95" 27'F.
Opisthotrema australe Blair, 1981
Aust, J. Zool. Suppl. Ser. BL: 9-10,
Holotype V1934 from custachian tubes and nnddle
car of Dugong dugen, collected for food by Torres
Strait Islanders, Thursday Is., Old., 3/11/76.
Paralypes V 1735-9 including sectioned niaterial,
Opecoelus scorpaenidicola Prudhoe & Bray, 1973
BANZARI; Rep, Ser, B. 8 (10): 209-10.
Cotypes V433-49, site in host unknown, from /eli-
colenus percoides, Scurpaena cruenta, and Lepide-
perca tasmanica, 42° 40'S, 148" 27' 30°F, off Maria
Is., Tas., collector T, H. Johnston, 23/3/31.
Pancreatrema meéliphagae Angel & Pearson, 1977
Trans, R. Soe. 8. Anse. LOL (5): 129-30.
Holotype V112 probably from bile duct of Meli-
phaga ernata, Blanchetown, S.A., collector P, M.
Mawson, April 1965.
Paraneocreadinm auxtraliense Kruse, 1978
J. Parasitol. 64 (3): 398-400,
Holotype V1496 from intestine of Psilocraninm
nigricans, Aldinga Reef, S.A., collector P. M. Maw-
son, 1962,
Paratypes V1497-L50L including sectioned material.
Parorchis acanthus yar. australis Angel, 1954
Trans, RB, Soe. 8. Aust. 77. 164-73.
REC. S. AUST, MUS. 18 (22): 503-511.
Muy, 19d
Holotype V988 from intestine of Larus movae-
hellandiae, Glenelg, S.A., collector T, H, Johnston,
1939,
Paratypes AFC S189,
Cercariag V991-2, metacercariae V994, redia V900,
cysts V993, and immature adult V898 as used for
the original description of the life cycle.
Pharyngosiomuides dasyuri Dubois & Angel, 1972
Trans. R. Soe, §. Aust, 96 (4); 213-4,
Holotype V1079 from small intestine of Dasyurus
Viverrinus, Leena Estate, Vas., from the collection of
J, C. Pearson, 9/11/66,
Paratypes VIORO,
Petdviger ausiralis Jahnston & Angel, [941b
Trans, R. Soe, S, Ans. 65 (2); 285-91,
Holotype V917, site probably intestine of Podieeps
poliocephalus, Vailem Bend, §.A., collectors G, & P,
Jaensch & L. Ellis, May 1941,
Cercuria giganiura V91V8-20, V2970, cysts V921
and metacereariae V922 as used for the original
description of the life cycle by Johnston & Angel.
Note: a type host was not designated in the original
description but on the slide deposited in SAM
Podiceps poliacephaluy is written as the hostin T, A,
Johuston’s own handwriting.
Plagierchis jaensehi Johnston & Angel, 1951a
Tray. R. Soc. 8. Aus, 74 (1): 49-58.
Holotype V&58 from small intestine of /ydraniyy
chrysogaster, Tailem Bend, S.A., collectors G. G.
and Bryce Jaensch between May 1938 and Deeem-
ber 1949,
Cercariage V859-60, V3794, sporocysts V&GI, cysts
V2795, V863, metacerearlae V862. Infected Lim-
nace lesson’ V2796, as used in the original deserip-
tions of the life eyele,
Postmonorchis variahilis Prudhoe & Bray, 1973
BANZARE Rep. Ser. B 8 (10): 202-3.
Cotypes V387-99, site in host unknown, from Noelo-
thenia cyanobrancha, Port Jeanne dArc, Kerguelen,
10/2/30 and Green Harbour, Kerguelen; Noto-
thenia acula, near head of Bras Bossiére, Kerguelen,
20/11/29; Notothenia rossi 49° 28'S, 70° 33'E off
entrance to Royal Sound, Kerguelen, 21/3/30, Har-
pagifer bispinus, Port Jeanne dAre, 16/2/30, col-
lector 'T. Hy Johnston.
Preboltiremea clelandi Johnston, 1934
Aust, J. Exp. Biol. Med, Sei, 12: 29-31,
Holotype V12 from hody cavity of Mustelus antare-
vicus, Encounter Bay, S.A., collector J. B. Cleland,
January, 1922.
Preéboliivema retundatuni Johnston, 1934
Aust. J. kexp. Biol. Med, Sci. 12: 28-9.
HELMINTH TYPE-SPECIMENS UI
Holotype VIO trom abdominal cavity of Trygen-
orrhina fasciata, Kangaroo Is,, S.A,, collector C. J,
Hackett, 1933.
Probolitrema simile Johnston, 1934
Aust. J. kixp. Biol. Mee. Sei. 12: 31-2,
Holotype V11 from body cavity of Mustelus antarc-
licus, Encounter Bay, $.A., collector J. B, Cleland,
January 1922,
Projolransversoirema vieert Angel, 1969
Parasitology 59: 719-24,
Holotype V970, under scales of Aldrichetia forsteri,
North Arm, Port R., S.A., collector B. Steer, July
1968,
Puratypes V971-3,
Pseudopecoelus pyriformis Prudhac & Bray, 1973
BANZARKE Rep. Ser. B 8 (10): 210-2,
Cotypes V450-3, site in host unknown, from Cal-
lanthias allporti, 42° 40'S, 148" 27° 30°R, off Maria
Is., ‘Tas,, collector 'T H, Johnston, 23/3/31.
Prosthogonimus vitellatus Nicoll, 1914
Ini. J. Parasitol. 3 p, 859—redescription by Angel,
1973,
Type host Chibia braceteata. Since the holotype,
located at the School of Public Health and ‘Tropical
Medicine Sydney, was found to be imperfect six
specimens V1122 from Gymmnerhina tihicen leuco-
nata, Tailem Bend, $.A., have been deposited in
SAM, collector T, H. Johnston, 1/6/40,
Skrjabinesonuim mawsoni Angel & Pearson, 1977
Trans, R, Soe, S. Aust, 11 (5): 124-6,
Holotype (lateral mount) V96 from liver of Mano-
rina flavigula, Port Augusta, S,A,, collector SAM,
May 1965.
Paratypes V96 (dorsal mount) on same slide as
holotype and V97; AHC S18.
Skrjabinosanum pomatastomi Angel & Pearson,
1977
Trans. R. Soc. 8S. Aust, WO1 (5); 126-7,
Holotype V99 from liver of Pomatostomus super-
ciliosus, The Bunkers, Flinders Ranges, 8.A., col-
lector SAM, 22/7/65.
Paratypes V99, six specimens on same slide as holo-
type and VIOO, VIOLI.
Stictodora diplacantha Johnston, 1942
Trans, R, Soe, S. Aust, 66 (2): 239-40,
Holotype V852, site in host not given, from Phala-
crocorax varius, Port Gawler, S.A., collector pro-
bably T, H. Johnston, date unknown,
Stenakron kerguelense Prudhoe & Bray, 1973
BANZAREL Rep. Ser. B 8 (10): 214-6,
Colypes V465-83, V733, site in host not given, from
Notothenia coriiceps Heard Is., 28/9/29; Notoe
thenia evanebrancha from various stations at Ker-
50Y
guelen between 16/11/29 and 15/2/30; Champso-
cephalus gunnari 49° 28'S, 70° 33’E off entrance
to Royal Sound, Kerguelen, 2/3/30; Zanchlorhya-
chus spinifer 54° 42’ 30°S, 158° 54° 30°, off
Lustitania Bay, Macquarie [s,, collector T. H, John-
ston, 4/12/30,
Tandanicola hancrafii T. HW. Johnston, 1927
Trans, R. See. 8. Aust. 51: 133-6.
Cotypes V3088, from the gas bladder of Tandanus
tendanis, Burnett R., Ridsvold, Old., collectors T, L.
Bancroft and M, J, Mackerras, date unknown.
CERCARIA
Cercaria avetabulopapillasa Angel & Manter, 1972
Ann, dust, Biol, Univ. Nal, Auion Mexico Al Ser.
Zool, 1; 5-9,
Cercariaec and melacercariac, V1IO07-12; redia
V1008, redia and cereariae VIOL3: infected Plu-
topsis tetrica with redia und cereariae VIO14s cysts
VIO1S,
Cercaria amerianne Johnston & Beckwith, 1947a
Rec, 8. Aust, Mus, 8 (4): 575-782.
Cercaria, V880, V¥2799; diplostomula and sporo-
cysts V&881, V882, V2880, infected Limnodynasres
sp. V2801,
Cerearia anevli Johnston & Beckwith, 1947b
Trans. R. Soe. §. Aust. 71 (2): 324-8.
Cercaria 2788, V884, sporocysts V883, infected
Ameria pyramidata V2787:
Cercaria angelae Johnston & Simpson, 19444
Trans. R. Soe. S. Aust, 68 (1): 130-2,
Cercariae V888, V2789) sporocyst V887; tetracotyle
V8S89-91. from Amerianna pyramidata and A.
fenuirosira,
Cercaria hbeckwithae Johnston & Angel, 19496
Trans, R. Soe, 8. Aust, 73 (1): 22-7.
Cercariae V2778, V895, V896; infected Planorbis
ising? V2779-80.
Cercaria clelandi Johnston & Angel, 1939
Trans, R- Soe. S. Aust. 63 (2); 200-3.
Cercaria V950, V2766; redia V951: from Planerbis
iwingi,
Cercarla gigantura var, grandior Johnston & Simp-
son, 19444
Trans. R. Soc. §. Aust. 68 (1): 128-30.
Cercuria V893, V¥2790; redia V892-3; metucerearia
V894; infected Amertanna pyramiddla V2792,
Cercaria haswelli Dolfuss. 1927
Sebrito del libro Homenaje al Dr Edwardo Caballero
y Caballero Mex, 1960; 75-85,
Taswell’s 1903 material, redescribed Angel, 1960.
Cercariae and sporocysts V1054.
S10
Cercaria jaenschi Johnston & Cleland, 1937
Trans. R. Soc, S, Aust, 61: 202-6,
Cereaniae VI057; infeeted Lenameira sp. V1055;
infected Amira pyramidaia serial sections, V 1058,
Cerearia lethargica Johnston & Muirhead, 1949
Trans. R. Soe, §. Atist, TZ (11> 106-8.
Cercariae = V868, V2783; meiaceccariae VR69;
sporocysts V867; eysts V2784: from Plotopsis tatel,
Cercaria lophosana Sohnsion & Beckwith, 1947b
Trans, R. Soc. 8. Aust 71 (2): 328-333.
Cercaria V886, V2785; sporocysts WS85: infected
Noropala hanleyi V2786,
Cercaria metadina Johnston & Angel, 1942
Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 66 (1): 50-9,
Cercaria V908-9, ¥2769; sporocysts V907; sporo-
cysts with diplastomula V910-3; diplostomula
V914-6: from Planorbis isingi, Ameriaana pyrami-
data and A, tenuirostra,
Cercaria natans Johnston & Muirhead, 1949
Trans. R. Soe. 8, Aust, TA (1): 103-6.
Cercariae, V865, V27815 metacereariae V866; redia
V864; infected Planorbis ising V2782.
Cercaria notopalae Johnston & Beckwith, 1945
Trans, R, Soc. S. Aust. 69 (2): 234-41,
Cercaria (fureocercaria) V879, V2775; sporocysts
V878; infected Notepala hanleyi V2776.
REC_ S. AUST. MUS, 18 (22); 503-511,
May. LO8d
Cercaria parocellata Johnston & Simpson, 1939
Trans, R. Sac. S§. Aust, 63.(1): 63-S-
Cercariae V945-6, Y2773: from Lyyinaea lessoui.
Cercaria plotiepsivy Johnstan & Simpson, 1939
Trans. R, Sec. S. Aust. 63 (1): 65-8.
Cercarise V947, V2774; from Plorepyis tatei.
Cercaria tated Johnston & Angel, 19400
Trans, R, See. §. Aust. 64 (2): 334-9.
Cercuriae W932-4, V2771; mictdeereariae V938;
sporocysts and cysts V935-7: from Ploiwpsiy tatei,
Cerearia teiradéna Johnston & Beckwith, 1945
Trans, R. Soc. S. Ausi. @9 (2); 229-33
now Cercaria tetradencidea (Johnstun & Beckwith,
1945) Johnston & Angel, 1940b,
Cercaria (furcocercaria) V928, V2777; sporocysts
V929- from Fletopsis tate.
Cercaria velesinionsis Angel, 1961
Trans. R. Soc. 8. Aust. 84+ 63-70.
Cereariae V998-99, V1003: metacereariac Y995-7,
V1002, young adults V1IO00-1: Crom Felesunio
ambiguis.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank Mrs. P.M. Thomas (Maw-
sou), Miss L. M. Angel and Dr. S. J. Edmonds
without whose advice and assistance these lists of
helminth types could not have been prepared. This
work was funded by an Austrahan Biological
Resources Study grant.
REFERENCES
ANGEL, L, M. 1954, Purerelis acanrhis var australis,
nm. Var., with am account of the life eycle in ‘South
Australia. Trams. R. Soe. S. Anse. 172 164-74,
ANGEL, L. M. 1960. Cerearie haswelli Dollfus, 1927; a
re-examination of Haswell’s material with a discussion
of the genus Tergestia, Sohretire del libra Homenaje
al Br Eduarnda Caballera y Caballero 1960: 74-86.
ANGEL, L. M, 1961, Larval trematodes from Australian
freshwater molluses, Park 15. Cercaria velusioniy n. sp.
Trans. R. Sac, 8S. Aust S84: 63-70,
ANGEL, L. M, 1946. Bancrofirenut neocerotadi gen. et
sp. N., a paramphistomatid trématode from the Aus-
tralian lung fish. /. Parasitol. 52 (6): 1058-61,
ANGEL, L. M, [967, The life-cycle of Eehinoparyphium
jiydromyos sp, noy, (Digenea: Echinosiomatidae)
from the Australian water-rat. Puresitology 57: 19-30.
ANGEL, L. M. 1969, Pretatrausversoltreme steeri gen. nov.,
sp. nov. (Digenea: Trinsversotremalidae) from a
South Australian fish. Parasitology 59: 719-24.
ANGEL, L. M. 1970. Coelomatrema untechinames gen. et
sp. nov,, a prosthogonimid trematode from Anie-
chinamys and Antechinus (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae)
from Australia, dust. J. Zool. 18: 119-24.
ANGEL, L. M. L971. Burtethis trichofureatay (Johnston
& Angel, 1940) and a nole on a felated species Tunde-
nicole banerafti Johnston, 1927, both from the Aus-
tralian freshwater catfish Tandanus tandanus, Parast-
folovy 62; 375-84,
ANGEL, EL. M. 1973. The family Prosthoponimidae (Tre-
miatods) in Australia. dat J. Parasital, 3: 854-62,
ANGEL, L. M., and MANTER, H. W. 1972. Pretestis
aistralianiy gen. et sp. noy, (Digenea: Puramphisto-
muatidue) from Austrativn fish, and a closely related
cercaria, Cercarig acetabulapapillosa sp. nov. with
notes on the life history. Aan. dnse. Bint. Univ. Nal.
Auta Mésica 41 Ser. Zool. bz 1-10,
ANGEL, LL. M., and PEARSON, J, C, 1977. Dirococtiid
trematodes ftom Ausiralian hosts, Trans, R. Soe. 8,
Aust, UL (5): 115-32.
BLAIR, D. 1979.) A new Fatnily of monastome flukes
(Phityhelminthes, Digenea) from the Dugong, Orgone
dugon (Muller). Ayn, Parasital., (Paris) 54 (5): 519-
26.
BLAIR, D. J98). The monostome flukes (Digenea: Fam-
lies Opistho-trematidae Poche and Rhabdiopocidae
Poche) parasitic in sifetieans (Mammalia: Sirenia).
Ansi, J. Zaol. Suppl. Ser. 8t2 1-34,
BLAIR, D,, BEVERIDGE, Lb, and SPEARE, R. 1979.
Mucrepotrema pertinax gen. ect sp. noy. (Digenes:
Parumphistomidae) from a wallaby, Maecropus apgilis
in northern Australia, and ussociited pathology. An.
Parasitol, (Paris) $4 (6); 585-2,
DOLFUSS, R. P, 1972. Norules sur des cercaires atlan-
tiques (1-2). Bull. Sow. Zoal. Franee $2 (2)+ 111-18.
DUBOIS, G., und ANGEL, L, M. 1972. Strigeata (Tre-
matoda) of Australian birds und mammals trom the
helminthologicul collection of the University of Ade-
laide, Trans. R. Sac. §. Aust. 96 (4)> 197-215.
DUBOIS, G., and ANGEL, L. M. 1976. Mesostephanus
nedaphacue mn, sp. (Strigeata: Prohemistomidae) para-
site dune olarie O° Australie, Neopheca cinerea
(Peron et Lesueur), Bull, Soo. Neueliat. Sei. Nat. 99:
29-32,
JOHNSTON, S. J. 1904. Contributions to i knowledge of
Austruliin Entozoa No, 3. On some species of Holo-
stomidac from Australian birds. Pree. Ginw. See.
N.S, 1904: 108-16,
JOHNSTON, T. H. 1927. New trematodes [rom an Aus-
tralian siluroid. Tras, R. Soe. 8. Ausr. $1; 129-36.
JOHNSTON, T. H, 1928. New trematodes from an Aus-
tralian water-hen CFallinula tenehrosa, Ree. §, Atast
Mus. 4 (1): 135-42,
HELMINTH TYPE-SPECIMENS IIL 311
JOHNSTON, T. H. 1230, The anatomy of the trematode
Macrraphyltida antarctica (Hughes) and a new species
ol trematode of the genus Anepladisens. Ast, J. Exp.
Biol, Mec. Sci. Te 11-12,
JOHNSTON, FT. H. 1934. New trematodes from South
Australian elismobranchs. Aus. J, Exp. Biol. Med.
Sei. 12: 25-32.
JOHNSTON, T. Mf. 1942 ‘Trematodes from Anstrallan
birds lL, Corthorants und Darlers, Trans. R. Sac. 8.
lust. 66 (2); 226-42.
JOHNSTON, T. H, and ANGEL, L, M. 1939. Larval
trematodes from Australian freshwater molluses, Part
4. Trans. R, Soc. 8S, Aust. 63 (2): 200-3.
JOHNSTON, T, H., and ANGEL, LL. M. i94)a, Larval
tremodes from Austrulian freshwater molluscs, Part 7,
Trats, Ry, Soc S. Aust. G4 (2)* 331-39.
JOTINSTONE, 1) HL, and ANGEL, L. M, 1940b. The mor-
phology and life history of the trematode Dolichopera
qunkyanind Nicoll. Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. G4 (2)) 376-
7
JOHNSTONE, T. H,, and ANGEL, L. M, 1941a, Life eycle
of the trematode, DPiplosionuim niurrayense Johnston
& Cleland. Trans, R, Sov, 8S. Aust. O35 (1)9 140-44,
JOHNSTON, T. H.. and ANGEL, L. M. (941b. The life
histury of the trematode, Fetasiger australis mn. sp,
Trans. R. Soc. 8, Aust. 65 (2): 285-91.
TOHNSTON, TV. HH, and ANGEL, L. M. 1942, Larval
trematodes from freshwater molluses. Part 8. Trans.
R. Soc. S. Aust. 60 (1): 50-59,
JOHNSTON, T. HL, and ANGEL, L. M. 19494, The life
cycle Of the trematode, Eehineparvphinm ellist trom
the Black Swan. Ree. §, dust. Mus. 9 (2); 247-54.
JOHNSTONE, T. H, und ANGEL, L. M, 1949b, Lurval
trematodes from Australian freshwater molluses. Trans,
R. Sac. 8. Aust. 73 (1); 22-28.
JOHNSTONE, ‘tT. Hy and ANGEL, L. M. 19S1a. The life
history of Plaviorchis jaensehi, a new trematode from
the Australian water rat. Vrans, J@. Soe. S. lust, 74
(1): 49-58,
JOHNSTON, 'T. H., and ANGEL, L, M, 195th. The mor-
phology and life eycle of the trematode Apetemon
inermedings fram the Black Swan. Trams. R. Sac. 8.
lust, TA (1): 66-78.
JOHNSTON, T, H,, und BECKWITH, A. ©. 1945, Larval
trematodes from Australian freshwater molluses. Part
10. Trans. R. Soe. 8. Aust. 69 (2): 229-42.
TOHNSTONE, 'T. H., and BECKWITH, A.C. 19474, Larval
trematodes from Australian freshwater molluscs. Part
11, Ree, &. Aust. Mus. & (4): 563-83.
JOHNSTONE, T. H., nd BECKWITH, A. C. 1947b. Larval
tremitodes from Australain freshwater molluscs. Part
12. Trins, R. Soe. §. Aussi. 7) (2). 324-53.
JOHNSTONE, T. HH, and CLELAND, A.C. 19397. Larval
trematodes from Australian tecrestrial and freshwater
molluscs, Part 2, Cerearia (fureacercaria) jaensehi n.
sp. Trans, R. Soc, S. Aust. 61: 202-6,
JOHNSTONE, T. H,, und CLELAND, A. ©. 1938. Larval
trematodes from Austrahan terrestrial and freshwater
molluscs, Part 3. Leueochloridiam anstraliense n. sp.
Trans, R, Soc. §, Aust, 62: 25-33,
JOHNSTONE, T. H., and MUIRHEAD, N. G. 1949. Larval
trematodes from Australian freshwater molluscs. Part
14. Trans. R. Soe, S. Aust. 73 (1): 102-8.
JOHNSTON, T. H., and SIMPSON, B. R. 1939. Larval
trematodes from Australian terrestrial and freshwater
molluses. Part S$. Trans, R. Soe. 8. Aust. 63 (1):
63-8_
JOHNSTON, T, H,, and SIMPSON, FE. R. 19408. The
iwnatomy and life history of the trematode Cyvclocorfunt
jaenschi n, sp. Trans, R. Soe. 8. Aust. GA (2); 274-8.
JOHNSTON, T. H.. and SIMPSON. E. R. 1940b. The
adult stage of the trematode Leneachloridiian atnstra-
liense. Trans. R, Soc. 8, Aust, 64 (1); 119-24,
JOHNSTON, T. H., afd SIMPSON, B. R, 19444, Larval
trematodes from Australian freshwater molluscs. Part
9. Trans. R- Soc, §. Aust. 68 (1): 125-32.
JOHNSTON, T. H., and SIMPSON, E, R. 1944b. Life
history of the trematode Echinochaymuis pelecani n.
gp. Trans. R. Soc. §S. Aust. 68 (1): 113-19.
KRUSE, G. O. W_ 1978. Trematodes of marine tishes from
South Australian, 1, Paraneocreadinm australianse wen.
af 0. n, (Lepocreadiidag)- J. Parasitol, #4 (3); 398-
0,
KRUSE, G, 0, W. 19790. Trematodes of marine fishes
from South Australia. 4. Sarveytreme bisenlatum gen.
et sp. n. (Lepacreadiidue), J. Parasital, 65 (6): 918.
20),
KRUSE, G. O. W. 1979b, Trematodes of marine fishes
from South Australia. 6. Manostephaunesiomum mutt-
teri Ben. el sp. n. (Acanthocolpidae). J, Parasitol. 65
(6): 921-23.
KRUSE, G. O. W. 198]. Trematodes of marine fish from
South Australia, 3. Lepoereadium angeli sp. a, (Lepo-
creadlidae). Proc. f{felm. Soe. Wash. 48: 195-197,
LOOSS, A. 1899. Weitere Beitrige zur kenninis der
trematoden-fauna Aegyplens Zugleich versuch einer
naturlichen gliederung des genus Distomunt Re tris.
Zool. dahirh, Syst. V2: 521-784.
MANTER, H. W. 1970, A new genus of trematode
(Digenea; Gorgoderidae) from the ureter of tuna fish
(Thunnus (Thynnus) maccoyit) in Australia. 7 raas.
R_ Soe. &§. Anst. 94: 147-50.
NICOLL, W. 1914. The trematode piurasites of North
Queensland. 1. Parasitology f- 333-50-
PALOMBI, A. 1943. Notizie elmintologiche. 1V. Aneplo-
discus richarda © Anoplocotyle australis (Harvey
Johnston) nom. nov., loro posizione sistematica. sf ret..
Mus. Zoal. R. Univ, Napoli (n.s.) 7 (15): 163.
PEARSON, J.C. 1959, Neadiplasotum intermedium n, sp.
from the Allied Rat Rattus assimilis with remarks on
the genera Neodiplostomunt and Fibricola (Trematada!
Diplostomatidae). Parasitology 49 (1 & 2): 111-20.
PEARSON, ©. 1973. A revision of the sibfamily Huaplor-
chinae Loogs, 1899 (Trematoda: Helerophyidae) 11,
Genus Galaciosomumn. Phil. Trans, R. Soc. Lond. B
266 (879): 341-447.
PEARSON, J. C., and PEARSON, ©, C, 1983, Two new
species of the trematode genus /leferoplivey Trom
Sarawak. Sarawak Mus, J. 29: 171-189.
PEARSON, J. C. and GW YANG, C. K. 1982, New
species of Haplorchiy from South-east Asia, together
with keys to the Huplarchiy group of heterophyhd tre-
matodes of the region. S-F Asian 3, Trop. Med Pulr.
Flealth. V3» 35-All,
PRUDHOE, S., und BRAY, R.A. 1973. Digenetic trema-
lodes from fishes. BANZARE 1929-3] Rep, Ser. B
(Zool, & Bot.) 8 (10): 199-225,
SANDARS, D. F, 1944. A contribution to the knowledge
of the Microcotylidae of Western Australia, Trans. R.
Sae_ S. Aust. 68 (1): G7-8T-
SANDARS, D. F. 1945. Five new microcolylids from fish
from Western Australian waters. J. R. Noo. Wid. 24
(1942-3): 107-35,
YAMAGUTI, S. 197L. Synopsis of diagenetic trematodes of
vertebrates. Ketgaku, Tokyo.
A REVISION OF THE GENUS APLEROTUS DALLAS (HETEROPTERA:
PENTATOMIDAE: PENTATOMINAE) WITH DESCRIPTION OF A NEW
SPECIES FROM SOUTH AUSTRALIA
BY IMTIAZ AHMAD, NASEER AHMAD KHAN AND SYED KAMALUDDIN
Summary
A new species grossi of the genus Aplerotus Dallas, 1851 is described from South Australia, with
special reference to its metathoracic scent gland ostioles and male and female genitalia. The type
species, A. maculatus Dallas, is redescribed. The relationships of the genus within the subfamily
Pentatominae are also briefly discussed.
A REVISION OF THE GENUS APLEROTUS DALLAS (HETEROPTERA; PENTATOMIDAE:
PENTATOMINAE) WITH DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES FROM SOUTH AUSTRALIA!
by
IMTIAZ AHMAD, NASEER AHMAD KHAN? and SYED: KAMALUDDIN
Department of Zoology-Entomology, University of Karachi, Karachi-32, Pakistan
ABSTRACT
AHMAD, |. KHAN, NL A., and KAMALUDDIN, S. 1982.
A teyision of the genus Aplerolus Dallas (Heterop-
tera: Pentatomidae:Peniatominae) with description of a
new species from South Australia, Ree. S. Aust. Mis.
18 (23): 513-518.
A new species gross’ of the genus Apleretus
Dallas, 1851 is described from South Australia, with
special reference to its metathoracic scent gland
ostioles and male and female genitalia. The type
species, A, maculatus Dallas, is redescribed, The
relationships of the genus within the subfamily
Pentatominae are also briefly discussed.
INTRODUCTION
Aplero(us Dallas is to date monotypic and appears
quite common all over eastern, western and southern
Australia. (Gross, 1976). The type species 4. snacu-
latus Dallas is known only by a short. original
description of Dallas (1851) mostly based on colour
features and a more detailed deseription of Gross
(op. cit.) including, in addition to external features,
in the male genitalia the structures of parameres,
pygophore and uninflated aedeagus. Gross (op. cit.)
noled that seven attempts, all unsuccessful, were
made to inflate ihe aedeagus. The female genitalia
of the type species are entircly unknown,
By the courtesy of Dr G. F. Gross, Principal
Curator of the South Australian Muscum, Adelaide,
Australia, the present authors were able to examine
a long series of specimens from various Jocalitics
from castern, southern and western Australia which
clearly represented a complex of two species on
the basis of consistent differences in the characters
of general size, colour patterns on the central disc of
scutelluin, (Figs. | & 11), shapes of peritremes of
the metathoracie scent gland ostioles (Figs, 2 & 12)
and structure of the male and female genitalia (Figs.
3-9 & 13-19) as noted in the present descriptions
and “comparative notes” under each species, The
holotype of A. maculatus Dallas (without abdomen)
was examined by the senior author by the courtesy
' Financially supported by an earlier PARC-USDA Research
Project No. A-17-ENT-37, FG-Pa-181 und present PR-
SEA-155, FG-Puél.
“Presently at Imperial College of Scicnee & Technology,
London,
of Drs P. Freeman, Keeper of Entomology, and
W. J. Knight, who is in charge of the Hemiptera
section, the British Museum of Natural History,
London during his visit to that museum in the year
1977-78.
The new species is named grossi in honour of
Dr G, F. Gross in recognition of his voluminous
taxonomical works on various groups of penltatomo-
morphous Heteroptera. For measurements and dia-
grams ind for dissection of male and female geni-
talia, the conventional procedures especially those of
Ahmad and Khan (1980) have pvenerally been
followed.
Genus APLEROTUS Dallas
Aplerotus Dallas, 1851, p. 256; Gross, 1976, p.
370.
Description: Coloration; Generally dark but bril-
liantly patterned; pronotum with a pale median
streak and corium hear apex with a broad trans-
verse pale stripe,
Head: Eyes only slightly stalked; paraclypei more
or less equal to clypeus; antennae four-segmented
with basal segments at least reaching or distinctly
passing beyond head apex; antenniferous tubercles
spinously produced; labium short, never passing
beyond hind coxae, with basal segment slightly pass-
ing beyond bucculae.
Thorax: Pronotum more than 2!x broader than
long, lateral margins entire; metathoracic seent vland
ostiole with peritreme clongated, blade-like, evapora-
tive area well defined.
Abdomen: Convex beneath without sulcation, stri-
dulatory vittae present forming a curved line laterally
on 2nd, 3rd and 4th abdominal segments.
Male genitalia; Pygophore broader than long,
dorsomedian surface posteriorly produced into a
rounded or blunt process, lateral lobes prominent
and broad; parameres clongate with outer margin
medially straight, anteriorly prominently inwardly
curyed and more or Jess blade-like with serrated
margins; inflated aedeagus with trilobed dorsal mem-
branous conjunctival appendage, vesica long but
shorter than distantly placed and proximally atlached
median penial plates, sclerotized conjunctival
appendages and membranous lobes present.
Sl4
Female genitalia: First goniocoxae widely separ-
ated; 91h paratergites lobe-like, passing beyond
posterior margin of Sth paratergites; triangulin, arcus
and 2nd gonocoxae quite prominent and sclerotized;
spermathecal bulb without processes, proximal and
distal flanges well developed, proximal spermathecal
duct longer than distal one,
Comparative nore: Aplerolus Dallas appears most
closely telated to Diemenia Spinola and Niarius
Stal among the Diemenfa group in having four-
segmented antennae. It resembles Diemenia and
Kalkadoona Distant in having median penial plates
and the latter in having sclerotized second paired
conjunctival appendages and other membranous and
sclerotized conjunctival appendages in the aedeagus
but can be separated from both in having the lateral
mitrgins of the head in front of the eyes without
even a reduced tooth, the pronotal lateral margins
entire, without trace of crenulations and the para-
meres unique among the entire subfamily Pentato-
ninae.
Aplerows maculatus Dallas
(Pigs. 1-10)
Aplerotus maculaius Dallas, 1851, p, 256; Gross,
1976, p. 372,
Description; Coloration: Body black, uniformly
punctate except for a faint vertical line on middle
of clypeus, anterolateral margins of pronotum on
each side and a vertical median line of pronotum; a
smal] rounded patch on each basal angle, a median
patch on mediolateral margins and a single apical
patch on scutellum; a horizontal broad streak on
FIG. 1. Apleraits muevlatas.
REC. 5. AUST, MUS. 18 (23): 513-518.
Muy, 1984
each corium and proximal portion of each connexi-
val joint pale; eyes brownish black, ocelli light
pinkish,
Head: Anteocular portion shorter than the pos-
terior portion of head including eyes, length of
antcocular portion 0,7 mm (0.7-0.8 mm); length
posterior portion of head including eyes 0.9 mm
(0.8-1.05 mm); width of head 2.3 mm (2,21-2.8
mm); interocular distance 1.2 mm (1,1-1.4 mm);
interocellar distance 0.7 mm (0.7-0.8 mm); para-
clypei with anterolateral margin nearly straight,
anteriorly narrowed; antennae with basal segment
almost equal to apex of head, 3rd segment dis-
tinctly longer than 4th, length of segments 1 0.4 mm,
2 1.8 mm (1.8-2.1 mm), 3 1.3 mm (1,.3-1.5 mm),
4 1.2 mm (1.2-1.35 mm); antennal formula
1<4<3<2; labium short, not quite reaching hind
coxac, 4th segment distinetly longer than basal
segment, Jength of segments, 1 0.6 mm (0,6-0.7
tam), 2 1.0 mm (0.9-1.0 mm), 3 0.8 mm (0,8-0,9
mn), 4 0.7 mm (0.7-0,8 mm), labial formula
<4<3<2,
Thorax and Abdamen: Pronotum slightly longer
than head; length 1.7 mm (1,6-2,0 mm); width
4.45 mm (4.2-5.2 mm), Seutellum slightly longer
than. 2x head length; length 3.3 mm (3.25-3.8 mm);
width 2.9 mm (2,7-3,3 mm); metathoracic scent
gland ostioles (Fig. 2) with apex of peritreme
curved anteriad; Jength base scutellum-apex clavuys
1,3 mm (1.2-1.4 mm); apex clavus-apex corium 1,1
min (1.0-1.1 mm); apex scutellum-apex abdomen
including membrane 3.3 mm (3,1-3,5 mm); pos-
terior margin of 7th abdominal segment in females
shallowly concave, inner lateral margin convex; total
length ¢ 9.9 mm (9.3-9.9 mm), ? 10.6 mm (10.85-
11,2 mm)
Male genitalia: Pygophore (Figs, 3 & 4) with
posteroventral margin medially notched, apex af
dorso-median process rounded, inner dorsal process
large, straight, with outer margin entire, parameres
(Fig. 5) broad, with fine serratian on middie of
inner margin and a large tooth-adjacent to it near
proximal end; theca (Figs. 6-8) with broad, knob-
like dorsolateral appendages, median lobe of dorsal
membranous conjunctival appendage short with apex
sclerotized, with lateral margin sinuate, a pair of
lobe-like dorsolateral membranous canjunctival
appendages present with apex sclerotized, frontal or
2nd pair of conjunctival appendages with apex
broad, proximolaterally broad, median penial plates
anteriorly pointed, posteriorly elongated with apex
acute.
Female genitalia: (Figs. 9 & 10), Lateral margins
of Ist gonocoxae concave; 9th paratergites with
lateral margins concave; triangulin and arcus fused
REVISION OF THE GENUS APLEROTUS
mate rste
:
H
\
2, metathoracic scent glind ostioles, ventral view; 3, pygophorc, dorsal view, 4, pygo-
BIGS, 2-10. Aplereris maculatus: 2,
phare, ventral view: 5, paramere, inner view; 6, uedeagus, dorsal view; 7, aedeagus, ventral yiew; 8, aedeagus;
lateral view; 9, female genitalia, ventral view; 10, spermatheca,
16
with posterior margin, medially indistinctly im-
pressed; 2nd yonocoxae with posterior margin
medially impressed; proctiger with posterior margin
nearly straight, posteriomedian margin fused; 8th
paratergites slightly concave; spermatheea (Fig. 10)
with pump region narrowed, tube-like, distally broad,
median selerotized duet of spermatheen) dilation
distally and medially much dilated, proximal sperm-
thecal duct slightly longer than distal spermathecal
duct.
Material examined: Holotype ? Australia; Aple-
rotus maculanis Dallas; in British Museum Natural
History. London, 9.2, 62 South Australia: Araana
Dam, Fringunda Valley; Western Australia! E.
Balladonia; on Exocarpos ciipressiformis Labil, at
light and on Exocurpes aphyllus R. Be., 19.9.1963,
193.1967, 1.12.1968, 63.1973, 17-24.11,1975;
G, PF. Gross, E. G. Matihews and N. McFarland:
South Australian Museuni, Adelaide, Australiu.
Comparative note: A. maculatus is closely related
to 4. grossr, but it can easily be separated by its
short labium not reaching the hind coxae, in males
parame¢res with a large tooth al medioinner margins
and in females, the pump region of the spermatheea
large, tube-like. equal to the length of the sperma-
thecal bulb and by other characters as noted in the
description,
Aplerotus grassi sp. nev.
(Figs. 11-20)
Description: Coloration: Body black, woifarmly
punctate except for a prominent vertical line on
middle of clypeus; anterior thin and lateral wide
portion, 4 pair of small posterior spots and a wide
yertical median band of pronotuni; a small rounded
patch on each basal angle, a broad inverted T-shaped
band on middle and a single apical patch on seutel-
lum; thin posterolateral portion of embolium;
unteriar horizontal broad band on each corium and
proximal portion of each connexival joint dull pale;
eves brownish black; oeelli light pinkish.
Head: Anteocular distance distinctly shorter than
posterior portion of head including eyes; length of
anteocular portion 0.65 mim (0.65-0,7 mm); length
posterior portion of head including eyes 0.85 mim
(0.8-1.0 mm); width of head 2.1 mm (2.05-2.3
mm); interocular distance |,15 tim (1,1-1.25 mm);
interocellar distance 0.7 mm (0.7-0.8 mm); para-
clypei with anterolateral margin prominently con-
vex, anteriorly broad, anteanae with basul segments
noticeably passing apex of head: 3rd segment about
equal to or slightly longer than 4th segment, length
of segments 1 0.55 mm (0.5-0.55 mm), 2 1,70 sun
(1.65-1,9 mm), 3 1.15 mm (1.1-1.3 mm), 4 1,15
mm (1.-1,125 mm); antennal formula <3 —
REC. 5. AUST. MUS. 18 (23); S13-318,
May, 1984
4<2; labium reaching distinctly beyond hind coxae,
4th segment equal in length to basal segment, length
ot segments | 0.6 nun, 2 0.9 mm (0,9-L.0 mm),
3.0.8 mm (0.8-0,.9 mm), 40.6 mm, labial formula
[s4<3<2,
Vhorax and Abdomen: Pronotum slightly shorter
than head, length 1.45 mm (1.35-l.7 mm); width
3.9 mm (3.7-4.5 mm); scutellum slightly shorter
than 2x head length; length 2,8 ann (2,7-3,3 mm);
width 2,4 mm (2.3-3.0 mm); metuthoracic scent
gland ostioles (Fig. 12) width apex of peritremes
narrowed and directed laterad; length base scutellum-
apex clavas 1-3 mm (1-1-1.5 mm); apex elavus-
apex corium 1.0 min (10-152 mm); apex sculellum-
upex abdomen including membrane 3.1 min (2.9-
3.2 mm); posterior margin of 7th abdominal
sternum m females deeply concave, inner margins
straight, total Jeneth 3 8.85 mm (8.4-8.85 mm);
29,85 mm (9.6-9.9 min),
Male genitalia: Pygophore (Figs, 13 & 14). with
posteraventral margin medially impressed inte a pit,
apex of dorsomedian process truncated, inner darsal
process large, curved with outer margin sjnuate;
paramercs (Pig. 15) narrowed, small dentation at
iver margin near apex; prominent theca (Tigs. 16-
18) with comparatively narrowed knob-like darso-
lateral appendages, median lobe of dorsal mem-
brinmous conjunctival appendage short with apex
sclerotized, lateral margins concuye, a pair of lobe-
like dorsolateral membranous conjunctival appen-
dage with apex sclerotized, frontal or 2nd pair of
conjunctival uppendages sclerotized with apex nar-
rowed, proximolaterally macrowed median penal
plates anteriorly rounded, posteriorly clongated with
apex blunt .and rounded,
FIG. IL. Aplerems press
REVISION OF THE GENUS APLEROTUS
<-s
FIGS. 12-20. Apleratus grassi: 12. metathoracic scent gland ostioles, ventral view; 13. pygophore. dorsal view; 14.
pygophore, ventral view; 15, paramere, inner view: 16, aedeagus, dorsal view; 17, acdeagus. ventral view; 18, acde-
agus, lateral view; 19, female genitalia, ventral view: 20, spermatheca
518
Female genitalia; (Figs. 19 & 20). Lateral margins
of Ist ygonocoxae sinuate; 9th paratergites with
lateral margins convex; triangulin and arcus fused
with posterior margin medially distinctly notched;
2nd gonocoxae with posterior margin medially con-
cave; proctiger with posterior margin deeply con-
cave; posteriomedian margin of fused 8th para-
tergites slightly convex; spermatheca (Fig, 20) with
pump region broad, barrel-shaped, shorter than
spermathecal bulb, median sclerotized duct of
spermathecal dilation much dilated near proximal
end, proximal spermathecal duct more than 4x as
long as distal sperniathecal duct.
Material examined: Holotype 3 South Australia:
Secale Bay, 16.10.1963: G, F, Gross; paratypes:
4¢ and 39 South Australia; Sceale Bay, Eritgunda
Valley; 16,10,1963, 11.11.1966, 6.3.1973, 4,12.
1974, 24,11,1975; at light; G. F. Gross, BE. G,
Matthews; all in the South Australian Museum,
Adelaide, South Australia.
Comparative nate: A. grossi is closely related to
A, maculatus Dallas, but it can readily be separated
by having the anterolateral margins of the paraclypei
strongly convex, the metathoracic scent gland
ostioles with peritremes sinuate, blade-like, apex
subacute, in males, the parameres with dentation
on the inner apical margin and in female sperma-
theca with the pump region short, barrel-shaped,
shorter than the bulb and by other characters as
noted in the description,
SYSTEMATIC POSITIONS
The members of the genus 4pleroins, by virtue
of the possession of strigose vittac, have variously
been placed in the tribes Mecideini Distant and
REC. S. AUST. MUS, 18 (23): 513-518
Way, 1984
Diemenini Kirkaldy and the Diemenia group of
Gross (1976), Gross included nine genera occur-
ring in South Australia. The three genera men-
tioned here were keyed out together as all hav-
ing four-segmented antennac. Gross (op. cit.)
described and figured the aedeagus and parameres
of representatives of Diemenia, Kalkadoona Distant
and Oncocoris Mayr, and the spermatheca of OQ,
desertus Bergroth. McDonald and Edwards (1978)
and McDonald (1978, 1979) described and figured
the male and female genitalia of all species of
Oncocoris and of one species of Kalkadoona. The
male and female genitalia of other members of the
group are virtually entirely unknown. Ahmad and
Khan (1980) described Knightiella to accommodate
Stenozygum flavifrons Distant, which also possesses
sttigose villae, Probably the strigose vittac are
shared by the members of remarkably diverse groups
in the same way as pseudoclaspers are known in
three very diverse genera of pentatomids (McDonald
1976).
On the basis of the male genitalia of the known
members of the Diemenia graup the twa species of
Aplerorns certainly share the characters of medial
penial plates, sclerotized paired second conjunctival
appendages (presently called frontal appendages)
and various membranous lobes and sclerotized
appendages of the conjunctiva, which are especially
similar to those of Kalkadoona pallida (Van Duzee),
The structure of the parameres, pygophore and other
details of the inflated aedeagus of Aplerotus appear,
however, to be entirely different and isolate it from
the rest of its group like Knightiella which also
appears to be very different [rom other Pentato-
minae (Ahmad and Khan 1980), The male geni-
talia of Niarins are uoknown, It could be that this
genus and Aplerofus would form a group.
REFERENCES
AHMAD, L, and KHAN, N, A, 1980, Two new genera
of the subfamily Pentalominae (Heleroptera:Penlulo-
midae) from the Australian Region, Ree. §. Aust. Mis,
18 (3): 83-90.
DALLAS, W. 8, 1851, List of the specimens of hemiplerous
insects in the collection of the Brilish Museum. 1
(London),
GROSS, G. F. 1976, Plant-feeding and other bugs (Hemip-
tera) of South Australia, Heteroptera, Part IL Govern-
ment Printer, Adelaide,
McDONALD, F, J. D, 1976. Revision of the genus Tri-
chopenla (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in’ N. America.
J. N.Y. Entomol. Sov. 84 (1): 9-22.
McDONALD, F. f. BD. 1978. Appendix. A description of
Seven new species of Oncocoris Mayr (Wemiptera:Pen-
tatommuae), wilh a key to species. Aus. J. Zool. Suppl.
Ser, No. 62: 19-53.
McDONALD, F. J. DD. 1979. Oncwceris
(HemipterasPentatomidae), J. Aust.
187-189,
McDONALD, F. J. D. and EBWARDS, P. B. 1978.
Revision of [he Genus Oneecoris Mayr (Hemiptera;
Pentatomidae), Aust, J. 4Zvel. Suppl. Ser. No. 62+
1-53,
CNUs Sp, ne
eur Soc. VB:
oh
@
ho
5
Breet