Published in the United States of America
2023 * VOLUME 17 * NUMBER 1/2
AMPHIBIAN & REPTILE
ONSERVATION
amphibian-reptile-conservation.org
ISSN: 1083-446X eISSN: 1525-9153
Front cover: Falk’s Blue-headed Tree Agama (Acanthocercus cf. cvanocephalus) from south-eastern Angola. Photographed during an expedition
to elucidate the biodiversity of south eastern Angola with the Okavango Wilderness Project, in association with National Geographic. A different
photograph of this individual appeared as Fig. 2 in an article cataloging the lizards identified during that Project, which was published as:
Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 16(2) [General Section]: 181—214 (e322). Photo by Chad Keates.
Official journal website:
amphibian-reptile-conservation.org
Amphibian & Reptile Conservation
17(1/2) [General Section]: 1-18 (e324).
An annotated checklist of the herpetofauna of the Sibiloi
National Park in northern Kenya based on field surveys
1.2,Sebastian Kirchhof, *Victor Wasonga, “Tomas Mazuch, *Stephen Spawis, and * Patrick Kinyatta
Malonza
‘Division of Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES ?Museum fiir Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for
Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Invalidenstr. 43, 10115 Berlin, GERMANY +Herpetology Section, National Museums of Kenya, P.O. Box
40658-00100, Nairobi, KENYA *Department of Forest Ecology, Mendel University in Brno, 61300, Brno, CZECH REPUBLIC °%7 Crostwick Lane,
Spixworth, Norwich, NRIO 3PE, UNITED KINGDOM
Abstract.—The xeric Lake Turkana area in northern Kenya is often referred to as the “Cradle of Mankind”
due to the abundance of hominin fossils. Sibiloi National Park in the Turkana Basin has been well studied
for its fossils, but the extant biodiversity of the park remains largely under-surveyed. Today, the ecosystem
is threatened by climate change, increasing human population pressure, poaching pressure, overgrazing by
domestic stock, and a series of major hydropower dams and irrigated agricultural schemes (particularly the
Gilgel Gibe Ill Dam) in Ethiopia, which may have a negative impact on the water supplies of the lake. The Turkana
Basin has a high diversity of arid land herpetofauna, particularly terrestrial geckos. However, due the region’s
remoteness many expected species have never been recorded within the National Park. Here we provide an
annotated list of the rich reptile and amphibian fauna based on two recent field surveys, including multiple first
records for Sibiloi National Park. The surveys yielded records for 34 species, including six amphibians and 28
reptiles (one fresh water turtle, one crocodile, 18 lizards, and eight snakes). In total, 49 species of herpetofauna
are currently known for Sibiloi National Park, including eight amphibians and 41 reptiles (three fresh water
turtles, one crocodile, 25 lizards, and 12 snakes). Of those, five species are protected by the Convention on
International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES; Appendices I, Il, or Ill), i-e., Trionyx triunguis, Crocodylus
niloticus, Varanus albigularis, Varanus niloticus, and Eryx colubrinus (all Appendix Il). Three species are
listed on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List (Vulnerable, Data Deficient), i.e.,
Sclerophrys turkanae, Trionyx triunguis, and Pelusios broadleyi. Two species (one toad, Sclerophrys turkanae,
and one terrapin, Pelusios broadleyi) are endemic to Kenya and most likely endemic to the vicinity of Lake
Turkana. Overall, the herpetofauna of the Sibiloi National Park already seems to be negatively affected and is
further threatened by climate change and land use activity. Furthermore, the area comprises a number of CITES
listed and IUCN Red List species other than the herpetofauna, including endemics, that warrant protection and
conservation measures to prevent further defaunation.
Keywords. Amphibians, climate change, conservation, field body temperature, Lake Turkana, land use, pastoralism,
reptiles, Turkana Basin Institute
Citation: Kirchhof S, Wasonga V, Mazuch T, Spawis S, Malonza KP. 2023. An annotated checklist of the herpetofauna of the Sibiloi National Park in
northern Kenya based on field surveys. Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 17(1/2) [General Section]: 1-18 (e324).
Copyright: © 2023 Kirchhof et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License [Attribution
4.0 International (CC BY 4.0): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/], which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original author and source are credited. The official and authorized publication credit sources, which will be duly enforced, are
as follows: official journal title Amphibian & Reptile Conservation; official journal website: amphibian-reptile-conservation.org.
Accepted: 3 November 2022; Published: 1 June 2023
changes, pollution, and climate change. Such threats
are linked to both anthropogenic activities and natural
causes. In East Africa, the distribution ranges of
Introduction
Reptiles and amphibians are currently considered to
be among the world’s most endangered groups, with
40.7% of amphibians and 21.1% of reptiles threatened
with extinction (Cox et al. 2022). This is perhaps
attributed to the fact that they are sensitive to habitat
destruction and fragmentation, various environmental
Correspondence. sebkirchhof@gmail.com, malonzapk@gmail.com
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
many amphibians and reptiles are still poorly known
due to the vast areas that have yet to be explored by
herpetologists (Spawls et al. 2018; Tolley et al. 2016).
Nevertheless, even the limited herpetological research
conducted to date clearly indicates a high diversity
of amphibians and reptiles in East Africa, including
June 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1/2 | e324
The Herpetofauna of Sibiloi National Park, Kenya
many threatened and endemic species (Channing and
Howell 2006; Largen and Spawls 2010; Spawls et al.
2018, 2019; Tolley et al. 2016).
Sibiloi National Park (SNP) is located in Marsabit
County in northern Kenya and about 1,570 km? in size
(Fig. 1). The park lies in the xeric Gregory Rift (the
eastern branch of the East African Rift fracture system)
on the northeastern shore of Lake Turkana (formerly
Lake Rudolf), the largest permanent desert lake and
the largest alkaline lake on Earth. The lake is part of
an endorheic basin, with three rivers (Omo, Turkwel,
and Kerio) supplying most of the lake’s water, and it
has no outflow. The area is often referred to as the
“Cradle of Mankind” because it is quite famous for
its hominin fossils, in particular Australopithecus and
early Homo fossils. The park was established in 1973
by the government of Kenya, mainly for the protection
of its paleontological sites, and was named for Mount
Sibiloi which is located at its southern boundary.
Together with the South Island and the Central Island
National Parks, the Lake Turkana National Parks were
declared as a UNESCO World Heritage site in 1997.
The site was listed as a World Heritage Site in Danger
in 2018, mostly owing to large-scale transfrontier
hydrological projects, in addition to climate change,
increasing human population pressure, poaching
pressure, and overgrazing by domestic stock.
The Lake Turkana area is characterized as a desert
and xeric shrubland biome (Somali-Maasai xeric
grasslands and shrublands ecoregion; Olson et al.
2001), and contains a variety of different habitats (Fig.
2). The area is surrounded by Acacia (now Vachellia)-
Commiphora bushland and thicket (Olson et al. 2001),
bordering the Chalbi Desert to the East, and elevations
range from around 340 m to 550 m (Thorsell 2003).
The plains are dominated by sand, silt, and gravel
and are interspersed with volcanic formations,
which include Mount Sibiloi and its remains of an
approximately 7 MYA old petrified forest (Thorsell
2003). The climate is generally hot and dry, with the
annual rainfall of about 250 mm mainly restricted to
March and April (Thorsell 2003). Temperatures at
the nearest weather station in Lodwar on the western
side of Lake Turkana average 32 °C throughout the
year, with an average annual maximum of 37 °C and
average annual minimum of 26 °C (Mbaluka and
Brown 2016). There are six major ethnic groups living
adjacent to the eastern side of the lake, including the
Daasanach, Gabbra, Turkana, Elmolo, Rendille, and
the Samburu (Kaijage and Nyagah 2009). Pastoralism
(mainly goats and sheep, but also cattle, donkeys, and
camel), agro-pastoralism, and fishing are the main
sources of livelihood for the local population. Due to
the ever-growing population around the lake, these
land use practices together with frequently occurring
droughts have a degrading impact on the habitats of
the area.
The vegetation is dominated by perennial and
annual grassy plains and dwarf shrublands, covered
with the grass Aristida sp. and the common dwarf
shrubs Indigofera spinosa and Duosperma longicalyx
(Mbaluka and Brown 2016). Much of the lake
Shoreline is occupied by perennial grasslands with the
halophyte Sporobolus spicatus and Dactyloctenium sp.
(Mbaluka and Brown 2016). However, large parts of
the shoreline in the study area are completely devoid
of vegetation or scattered with dead reed tussocks in
some areas. Woodlands and forests are only associated
with ephemeral streams and are dominated by
Vachellia tortilis (Mbaluka and Brown 2016).
Legend
© Sampling sites
[_] Country borders
oo Sibiloi National Park boundaries
WWF terrestrial ecoregions
[GS Masai xeric grasslands and shrublands
Gl Ethiopian montane grasslands and woodlands
GB East African montane forests
[4 Ethiopian montane forests
HS Northern Acacia-Commiphora bushlands and thickets
[9 Somali Acacia-Commiphora bushlands and thickets
(0) Lake Turkana
Fig. 1. Location of Sibiloi National Park (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN 2022) in Kenya and the main study sites: IL (IIkemere), KA
(Karare), KF (Koobi Fora), LO (Lomosia), AB (Alia Bay), and TBI (Turkana Research Institute). The inset map shows the African
continent, and the black square indicates the location of the enlarged map.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
2
June 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1/2 | e324
Kirchhof et al.
According to the latest IUCN Conservation
Outlook Assessment for the area (IUCN World
Heritage Outlook 2020), the local mammal fauna is
largely depleted. Notably, the hippopotamus, wild
dog, lion, cheetah, Reticulated Giraffe, Grevy’s
Zebra, and Lelwel Hartebeest are species which were
formerly abundant there but are now considered rare,
endangered, or locally extinct. Historical data indicate
that the lake once supported the world’s largest colony
of Nile Crocodile, but recent field observations suggest
the crocodile population is a fraction its former size,
likely due to increasing anthropogenic pressures
(IUCN World Heritage Outlook 2020). The lake is
rich in fish (47 species; Birdlife International 2022). In
addition, Lake Turkana is an internationally recognized
Important Bird Area (Birdlife International 2022),
with 84 water bird species, including 34 Palaearctic
migrants, according to the latest available data.
The only known extensive reptile and amphibian
survey of the area was conducted by Ziliani et al.
(2006). The results were presented at the 6" Congresso
Nazionale della Societas Herpetologica Italica in
2006, but have not been formally published other than
the abstract of that presentation and a new species
description (Sindaco et al. 2007).
The annotated checklist provided here is the result
of two six-week herpetological surveys of the SNP
conducted in 2016 and 2017. In addition, the species
recorded by Ziliani et al. (2006) are included and
discussed. The identifications of the new materials
collected in the present study were based on the species
descriptions and other literature, morphological
comparisons using the reference collection at the
National Museums of Kenya (NMK) and, in some
cases, the advertisement calls of amphibians (S.
Kirchhof, unpub. data).
Material and Methods
Two expeditions to SNP were conducted from 7
November 2016 to 11 December 2016 and from 28
March 2017 to 24 April 2017. Three observers sampled
a total of five sites across the National Park, three
along the Lake Turkana (L) shoreline, 1.e., Alia Bay
(AB), Koobi Fora (KF), and Ilkemere (IL), and two
further inland, 1.e., Karare (KA) and Lomosia (LO)
(Fig. 1). The LO site was only surveyed in March/April
2017. At each site close to the lake, we walked three
transects (one 1n grassland (G) along the shore, one in
bushland (B), and one in a dry riverbed (R); Fig. 2),
each with a length of about 800—1,000 m, for 3 hours
in the morning from 0800-1100 h and 4 hours in the
evening/night from 1700-1900 h and 2100-2300 h,
and this pattern was repeated over 2 days for each site.
At the inland sites, the same protocol was followed,
but the grassland transect was replaced with a second
bushland transect. In addition, opportunistic collections
were made at the Turkana Basin Institute (TBI) near
Illeret. The localities of all individuals of reptiles and
amphibians were recorded with a GPS (coordinates
in latitude, longitude, datum WGS 1984, in decimal
degrees), time of day was documented, and a brief
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Fig. 2. Representative examples of typical habitats within the
surveyed transects in the study area: (A) cattle grazing on the
grassland transect in KF; (B) bushland transect with compact
soil and loose rocks and stones in KF; (C) overgrazed grassland
transect at IL; (D) LO bushland transect; (E) AB bushland
transect; (F) dry lagga and adjacent riverine vegetation as part
of the KF river transect; (G) KA riverbed after rain; and (H)
section of the IL river transect.
description of the locality was given. When possible,
air, substrate/water and cloacal temperatures were
recorded and they are reported here. All temperature
were taken by means of a K-type thermocouple (B +
B Thermotechnik, effective measurement range -50 to
+260 °C) connected to a digital thermometer (Center
300) (accuracy + 0.1% +0.7 °C, resolution 0.1 °C,
effective measurement range -200 to +1,370 °C). Body
temperatures (T,) were measured by means of cloacal
temperature with the thermocouple inserted 10-15 mm
into the animal’s cloaca.
Taxonomy follows information from Amphibiaweb
(https://amphibiaweb.org), Channing and Howell
(2006), Frost (2022), Largen (2001), Uetz et al. (2022),
and Spawls etal. (2018, 2019). Selected individuals were
collected as voucher specimens; and when necessary,
individuals were euthanized using an aqueous solution
of benzocaine (20%) injected into the body cavity.
After injection, the individuals were measured, a tissue
sample (liver or muscle from dissected individuals,
tail tips from lizards, a ventral scale clip from snakes,
and toe clips from frogs) was taken and transferred to
ethanol (96%) for possible future molecular analysis,
and the specimen was fixed in 2% formalin. After the
expedition, voucher specimens and tissue samples
June 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1/2 | e324
The Herpetofauna of Sibiloi National Park, Kenya
were accessioned into the herpetology collection at
NMK. For each species account, NMK numbers and/
or field numbers (for the tissue samples from voucher
specimens, the specimen number is used, additional
tissue samples without vouchers are listed separately),
CITES status (where applicable), and any IUCN Red
List status other than Least Concern are provided in the
header of each species account.
Results
In total, we recorded 34 species, including six
amphibians (Fig. 3) and 28 reptiles comprised of one
freshwater turtle, one crocodile, 18 lizards, and eight
snakes (Fig. 4). Many taxa in the area currently have
multiple subspecies that warrant rigorous revision, so
only the binomial names (genus plus species epithet)
are used in this list. For each voucher specimen
collected and listed here, tissue samples in 96%
molecular grade ethanol are available at the NMK,
and these samples can be used in future taxonomic
analyses.
Species Accounts
Amphibia
Anura
Bufonidae
Lugh Toad
Poyntonophrynus lughensis (Loveridge, 1932)
Vouchers: NMK-A1824 (field no. SK1112)
Localities in the study area (henceforth simply called
localities): Turkana Basin Institute (TBI)
Remarks: On 28 March 2017, tens to hundreds of
individuals were calling in the late morning (0900-
1100 h) together with Tomopterna wambensis in a
temporary water body created by recent rainfalls
in the usually dry bushland in front of the TBI near
Illeret. Several pairs of Poyntonophrynus lughensis
were found in amplexus. One female was collected
and accessioned in the NMK collection (Fig. 3A).
Similar to other members of the African pygmy toads
of this genus, the natural history of P. /ughensis is
almost completely unknown (Ceriaco et al. 2018).
Interestingly, in a recent large-scale molecular
phylogeny of African toads, P. /ughensis actually
clustered with the species of the genus Mertensophryne
Tihen, 1960 (Liedtke et al. 2017).
Sub-desert Toad
Sclerophrys xeros (Tandy, Tandy, Keith, and Duff-
MacKay, 1976)
Vouchers: NMK-A1817 (field no. SK1118)
Localities: TBI
Remarks: One male was calling on 13 April 2017 in
an artificial water reservoir at TBI. This was the only
individual we recorded of this widespread species
from dry savanna and semi-desert. The specimen
(Fig. 3B) showed the bright scarlet vermiculation on
the posterior femoral integument typical for S. xeros.
In addition, the call resembled typical S. xeros calls.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Turkana Toad
Sclerophrys turkanae (Tandy and Feener, 1985)
IUCN Red List: Data Deficient
Vouchers: NMK-A1816 (field nos. SK16 1057,
SK16 1059, SK16 1060-1064)
Localities: AB (R), KF (G)
Remarks: Endemic to Kenya. This toad (Fig. 3C)
was very abundant in the grassland transects along
the shores of Lake Turkana, and found in high
numbers and different sizes at Alia Bay and Koobi
Fora. During the day they were hiding in moist mud
cracks, and at night they were on land in slightly
flooded grassy plains right at the lake edge. Males
were calling in November, and the calls affirmed
their identification as S. turkanae. According to
the latest published amphibian guide (Spawls et
al. 2019), this species is only known from Lake
Turkana. The IUCN assessment mentions records
from two localities in north-central Kenya:
Loyangalani [Loiengalani] (south-eastern shores
of Lake Turkana), and Uaso Nyiro River in the
Samburu Game Reserve (IUCN SSC Amphibian
Specialist Group 2016).
Ptychadenidae
Nile Ridged Frog
Ptychadena nilotica (Seetzen, 1855)
Vouchers: NMK-A1818 (field nos. SK16 1045,
SK16 1046, SK16 1056, SK16 1058, SK16 1065—
1068, SK16 1070, SK16 1097, SK16 1105)
Localities: IL (G), AB (R), KF (G)
Remarks: This species (Fig. 3D) was found in high
numbers. Individuals were found at night together
with Sclerophrys turkanae in flooded grassy plains
along the shore of Lake Turkana, but also on the
edge of temporarily flooded waterbodies and in the
riverbed transects slightly further away from the
actual lake shore where S. turkanae was mostly
absent. When disturbed at the water edge on land,
individuals of P. nilotica escaped by jumping into
the lake, but instead of diving into the water, they
rather jumped across the water surface for several
meters without sinking before jumping back on
land.
Schilluk Ridged Frog
Ptychadena cf. schillukorum (Werner, 1907)
Vouchers: NMK-A1825 (field no. SK16 1105)
Localities: IL (R)
Remarks: Ptychadena schillukorum currently has a
large distribution range across sub-Saharan Africa,
from Mauritania to Somalia and south to Angola
and Mozambique. The taxonomy of frogs referred
to as P. schillukorum is unresolved, and this taxon
may actually represent a species complex (e.g.,
Nago et al. 2006). We assigned individual SK16
1105 (Fig. 3E) to P. cf. schillukorum based on the
following features: skin of the flank granular or
warty, tympanum-eye diameter ratio about 0.70,
both internarial distance and nostril-tip of snout
distance less than nostril-eye distance.
June 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1/2 | e324
Kirchhof et al.
A previous record from the Omo River delta
in Ethiopia already exists. On the night of 9
December 2016, the sole individual SK16 1105 was
found sitting on soft sand in the dry riverbed of
an ephemeral river (known as “lagga” or “lagha”),
about 1.6 km from the lake shore. In arid lands, this
species usually inhabits permanent water bodies
such as swamps and springs where they can occur in
sympatry with P. nilotica (e.g., in Shompole swamp,
Magadi, southwestern Kenya) (PK Malonza, pers.
obs.). Molecular analyses will help to resolve the
taxonomic status of the P. schillukorum group.
Pyxicephalidae
Wamba Sand Frog
Tomopterna wambensis Wasonga and Channing,
2013
Vouchers: NMK-1815 (field nos. SK16 1024, SK16
1071, SK16 1084, SK 1111)
Localities: IL (G, R), KA (R), KF (R), LO (R), TBI
Remarks: This medium-sized, stout, semi-fossorial
frog was quite common in the study area. Its inner
metatarsal tubercle is used for digging into the soil
of dry riverbeds in order to reach moister areas
and survive droughts, and the outer metatarsal
tubercle is absent. It can be further identified by its
interrupted glandular ridges below the tympanum.
As soon as a few drops of rain fell — often during
the night — the buried individuals of 7: wambensis
(Fig. 3F) appeared on the surface. On 28 March
2017, tens to hundreds of individuals were calling
in the late morning (0900-1100 h) together with
Poyntonophrynus lughensis in a temporary water
body created by recent rainfalls in the usually dry
bushland in front of the TBI. For one individual,
an internal field body temperature (T,) of 29.4 °C
was recorded at an air temperature (T,) of 30 °C and
substrate temperature (T,,) of 21 °C.
Reptilia
Testudines
Trionychidae
Nile Soft-shelled Turtle
Trionyx triunguis (Forskal, 1775)
IUCN Red List: Vulnerable. CITES App. I
Vouchers: None
Localities: KF (B)
Remarks: The carapace of one dead individual of this
soft-shell turtle was found about 900 m from the shore of
Lake Turkana at Koobi Fora. These turtles are still eaten
by the local people around Lake Turkana (V. Wasonga,
pers. obs.; Spawls et al. 2018), so we suspect the locality
does not reflect the individual’s actual habitat. The Nile
Soft-shelled Turtle inhabits permanent lakes, dams, and
rivers, and is known to enter the sea, but it does not live
in any other Kenyan lake in the Great Rift Valley other
than Lake Turkana, because none of the other rivers were
ever connected to the Nile system (Spawls et al. 2018).
Crocodylia
Crocodylidae
Nile Crocodile
Crocodylus niloticus Laurenti, 1768
CITES App. I
Vouchers: None
Localities: AB (L), IL (L, B), KF (L, G)
Remarks: The Lake Turkana population of Nile
Crocodiles used to be the largest in the world (IUCN
World Heritage Outlook 2020). Recent data suggests that
the crocodiles are heavily impacted by local fishermen
who destroy nesting sites, and the remaining population
is only a fraction of what it used to be (UCN World
Heritage Outlook 2020). We found Crocodylus niloticus
in Lake Turkana and adjacent water bodies along the
shoreline. Very young juveniles (Fig. 4A) were found in
March/April.
Fig. 3. Amphibian species recorded during the surveys: (A) Poyntonophrynus lughensis, (B) Sclerophrys
xeros; (C) Sclerophrys turkanae, (D) Ptychadena nilotica, (E) Ptychadena cf. schillukorum;, and (F)
Tomopterna wambensis.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
June 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1/2 | e324
The Herpetofauna of Sibiloi National Park, Kenya
Squamata
Agamidae
Red-headed Rock Agama
Agama lionotus Boulenger, 1896
Vouchers: NMK-398L/1 (SK16 1038b), 399L/1-—2 (field
nos. SK16 1114-1115)
Distribution: AB (R), petrified forest
Remarks: The distribution of this taxon is still uncertain
in many parts of its range because of possible confusion
with Agama agama (but not in Kenya), A. finchi, and A.
dodomae (Spawls et al. 2018).
This agama was only found in Alia Bay (three
individuals including one juvenile NMK-398L/1 (SK16
1038b)) and in the petrified forest (NMK SK1115). In
the absence of rocks, this species was entirely arboreal,
living on Vachellia sp. trees in the riparian woodlands
along the dry riverbeds. Only in the rock-dominated
petrified forest site (about 5 km from Karsa Gate, the
southern entry point of SNP) was this species rupicolous.
We found Agama lionotus individuals (Fig. 4B) only
between 1800 h and 2100 h. The average T, was 33.8 +
1.7 °C (32.6-35 °C; N = 2) with T., ranging from 30-34
°C and T, ranging from 32-35 °C.
Riippell’s Agama
Agama rueppelli Vaillant, 1882
Vouchers: NMK-375L/1-4 (field nos. SK16 1042, SK16
1074, SK16 1075, SK16 1094)
Distribution: AB (B), KA (B, R), KF (R), LO (B)
Remarks: This species occurs in dry savannas and semi-
deserts in lower elevations (Spawls et al. 2018). We
recorded 25 individuals of this strictly terrestrial agama
(Fig. 4C) in bushland at all sites except IL. Activity was
high during all four study months, and individuals were
observed to be active from 0900 h to 2200 h. The average
T, was 31.9 + 3.0 °C (28.4-36.5 °C; N = 5) with T.,
ranging from 24-39 °C and T, ranging from 27—36 °C.
b
Eublepharidae
Somali-Maasai Clawed Gecko
Holodactylus africanus Boettger, 1893
Vouchers: NMK-390L/1-3 (field nos. SK16 1080, SK16
1081, SK16 1083)
Distribution: KA (R), IL (R), TBI
Remarks: Very little is known about this nocturnal
terrestrial eyelid gecko and only occasional records
exist. It is assumed to occur throughout dry savannas
and semi-deserts from southeastern Ethiopia, northern
Somalia through Kenya and into northeastern Tanzania
at low elevations of 200—1,000 m (Spawls et al. 2018).
We found seven individuals in November, December,
and April in dry sandy river beds at KA and at TBI
near the water reservoir. The species’ occurrence seems
to be associated with high groundwater and/or dense
vegetation as all individuals were found at night in
the riverbed at the edge of the vegetated slope. Three
different color morphs were found, including yellowish,
slightly pink, and darker brown (Fig. 4D). These are
the first Kenyan records from the eastern side of Lake
Turkana.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Gekkonidae
East African House Gecko
Hemidactylus angulatus Hallowell, 1852
Vouchers: NMK-380L/1-3 (field nos. SK16 1110, SK
1116, SK16 1055)
Localities: KF (B), TBI, petrified forest
Remarks: This is a fairly large gecko that is widespread
in Kenya, occurring south to Tanzania, north to Sudan
and west to Senegal, and occupying a variety of dry
and mesic habitats (Spawls et al. 2018). It can be
distinguished from H. ruspolii and other Hemidactylus
by small granules covering the upper surface of the snout
rather than large and keeled granules, heterogeneous
dorsal scales with small granular scales interspersed
with rows of large, keeled, and mainly oval tubercles,
and males with a series of 20-46 preano-femoral pores
interrupted mid-ventrally (Fig. 4E). Three individuals
were found over the course of our study, and all of them
were associated with rocks or anthropogenic structures/
houses. This taxon might actually represent a species
complex (the type locality is in Gabon), and extensive
molecular analyses are necessary to resolve its status.
One gravid female carrying eggs was collected on 7 April
2017.
Barbieri’s Turkana Gecko
Hemidactylus barbierii Sindaco, Razzetti, and Ziliani,
2007
Vouchers: NMK-378L/1—4 (field nos. SK16 1078, SK16
1085—1087)
Distribution: KA (R)
Remarks: Four individuals were found at KA (about 15
km inland of Lake Turkana) at about 514 m elevation.
These represent the first records from the eastern side
of Lake Turkana (Sindaco et al. 2007). This species
can be distinguished from the syntopic Hemidactylus
ruspolii Boulenger, 1896 by the presence of precloacal
pores in males (instead of femoral pores), and a dorsal
pattern consisting of four transverse dark grey (or at least
bordered with dark grey margins) bands (one nuchal
and three between anterior and posterior limbs), and a
dark rather narrow crescent shaped band bordering the
posterior skull margins and extending through the eyes
to the nostril (more pronounced in the yellow and black
juveniles; Fig 4F). It is different from Hemidactylus
bavazzanoi Lanza, 1978 in the mental scale arrangement
as well as the dorsal pattern, which in H. bavazzanoi
comprises only three dark transverse bands and a broader
crescent shaped head band. Little is known about the
ecology of H. barbierii. It is usually considered to be
terrestrial, hiding under ground coverings or in holes
(Sindaco et al. 2007; Spawls et al. 2018). Based on our
observations, we consider it to be arboreal rather than
terrestrial. This species inhabits the riparian woodlands
along dry laggas where individuals were found actively
foraging at night on the tree stems and at the bases of
trees. All individuals escaped by fleeing up the trees
rather than running away on the ground. One recently
hatched individual (Fig. 4F) was found during the day
hiding under the bark of a Vachellia sp. tree at about 1.8
m above the ground on 29 November 2019.
June 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1/2 | e324
Kirchhof et al.
>
aagsek ai 2 sem
: Pee.
Fig. 4. Reptile species recorded during the surveys: (A) Crocodylus niloticus, (B) Agama lionotus,; (C) Agama rueppelli, (D)
Holodactylus africanus; (EK) Hemidactylus angulatus;, (F) Hemidactylus barbierii; (G) Hemidactylus lanzai, (H) Hemidactylus
ruspolii; (1) Homopholis fasciata;, (J) Lygodactylus somalicus, (1K) Stenodactylus sthenodactylus, (L) Heliobolus spekii; (M)
Latastia longicaudata; (N) Philochortus rudolfensis, (O) Chalcides bottegi; (P) Mochlus sundevallii, (Q) Trachylepis striata; (R)
Varanus albigularis; (S) Eryx colubrinus, (T) Platyceps brevis, (U) Psammophis cf. tanganicus;, (V) Psammophis punctulatus, (W)
Rhamphiophis rostratus, (X) Naja pallida; (Y) Bitis arietans, and (Z) Echis pyramidum.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. vA June 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1/2 | e324
The Herpetofauna of Sibiloi National Park, Kenya
So far, this species 1s only known from the Lake Turkana
region. The type series was collected south of KF, 10 km
inland from AB (Sindaco et al. 2007).
Lanza’s Gecko p
Hemidactylus lanzai Smid, Mazuch, Novakova, Modry,
Malonza, Elmi, Carranza, and Moravec, 2020 et al. 2020
Vouchers: NMK-391L (field no. SK16 1021); NMK-
383L/1-2 (field nos. SK16 1029, SK16 1033); NMK-395L
(field no. SK16 1039); NMK-392L (field no. SK16 1053);
NMK-393L (field no. SK16 1037)
Additional tissue samples: SK105 2016
Localities: AB (R), IL (R, G, B), KA (R, B), KF (R, G), LO
(R)
Remarks: Recently elevated to a full species from the
synonymy of its sister species Hemidactylus isolepis
Boulenger, 1895, this small, terrestrial gecko is a typical
inhabitant of the dry, semi-desert areas in northern Kenya
(Spawls et al. 2018). This species (Fig. 4G) was one of
the most common reptiles in SNP, with 96 individuals
recorded. The highest abundance was along the shores of
Lake Turkana, where individuals were hiding in the root
system under dried reeds, but it also was found tn dry laggas
and bushland under dead logs, trees, and rocks. It was
exclusively active at night, foraging on sand, gravel, and
compact soils. The average T, was 34.0 + 1.5 °C (30.5-35.8
°C; N = 10) with T. , ranging from 24-47 °C and T, ranging
from 28-38 °C.
Prince Ruspoli’s Gecko
Hemidactylus ruspolii Boulenger, 1896
Vouchers: NMK-377L/1—11 (field nos. SK16 1026, SK16
1028, SK16 1032, SK16 1040, SK16 1044, SK16 1054,
SK16 1073, SK16 1089)
Localities: AB (R), IL (B, R), KA, (B, R), KF (B, R)
Remarks: This medium-sized gecko (Fig. 4H) is less
widespread in East Africa and inhabits drier and lower
areas in Kenya, Somalia, and Ethiopia compared to its
relative H. angulatus. This species was quite abundant in
the riverbeds of SNP were we often found it at night under
bark, foraging along tree stems, and at the foot of trees. A
few individuals were also found in bushland on Salvadora
persica (“toothbrush tree”). Average T, was 32.3 + 1.0 °C
(30.5-34.1 °C; N= 12) with T. , ranging from 25—33 °C and
T, ranging from 29-34 °C.
Banded Velvet Gecko
Homopholis fasciata (Boulenger, 1890)
Vouchers: NMK-386L/1-—2 (field nos. SK16 1095, SK16
1103)
Localities: AB (R), IL (R), KA (B), LO (R)
Remarks: The strictly arboreal Banded Velvet Gecko (Fig.
AT) is a savanna species that typically occupies holes and
crevices in large trees from sea level to at least 1,300 m
(Spawls et al. 2018). In SNP, we found six individuals in
December, March, and April. Individuals were found under
bark and in holes of Vachellia sp., as well as on the much
smaller and bush-like Salvadora persica. A gravid female
was collected on 30 March 2017. The average T, was 35 +
0 °C (N =2) with T. , ranging from 33—34 °C and T, ranging
from 34—35 °C. These are the first Kenyan records from the
eastern side of Lake Turkana.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Somali Dwarf Gecko
Lygodactylus somalicus Loveridge, 1935
Vouchers: NMK-387L/1-3 (field nos. SK16 1072, SK16
1101, SK16 1104)
Additional tissue samples: SK278 2016
Localities: IL (R, B), KF (R)
Remarks: This arboreal species is a typical inhabitant
of dry savannas and semi-deserts. During our surveys,
39 individuals of this small diurnal gecko (Fig. 4J) were
recorded in IL (N = 35) and KF (N = 4), in both bushland
and in dry riverbeds on small trees and shrubs (the majority
on Salvadora persica, but also on Vachellia sp.).
Elegant Gecko
Stenodactylus sthenodactylus (Lichtenstein, 1823)
Vouchers: NMK-396L/1-3 (field nos. SK16 1022, SK16
1030, SK16 1031)
Additional tissue samples: SKO84 2016, SK120 2016,
SK117 2016
Localities: AB (R, B), IL (R, B, G), KA (B), KF (R, B, G),
LO (B)
Remarks: This widespread nocturnal, terrestrial gecko
(Fig. 4K) is known from semi-deserts and deserts across its
range, but in Kenya it has only been recorded in the Lake
Turkana vicinity. It was very common in the study area,
with 75 individuals recorded. All individuals were found on
the ground (sand, gravel, often under shrubs) in the evening
and at night (1900 h to 2300 h). The average T, was 32.4 +
2.2 °C (25.8-35 °C; N = 20) with T,,, ranging from 23-33
°C and T, ranging from 27-35 °C.
Lacertidae
Speke’s Sand Lizard
Heliobolus spekii (Ginther, 1872)
Vouchers: NMK-376L/1-3 (field nos. SK16 1076, SK16
1082, SK16 1088)
Additional tissue samples: SK351 2017, SK468 2017,
SK469 2017, SK478 2017, SK479 2017
Localities: KA (B, R), LO (B), TBI
Remarks: Heliobolus spekii (Fig. 4L) is a widespread
generalist species inhabiting coastal thicket and woodland,
moist and dry savanna, and semi-desert at elevations from
sea level to 1,500 m (Spawls et al. 2018). We found 18
individuals throughout the study period. This species was
absent from the sites near the lake shore and from sparsely
vegetated areas. It was only found further inland at the
Karare site, Lomosia, and at TBI in more densely vegetated,
grassy bushland and on vegetated riverbanks. One pair
was observed mating on 17 April 2017. The average T,
was high at 37.5 + 1.4 °C (34.5-39 °C; N = 8) at substrate
temperatures (T.,) ranging from 28-49 °C and T, ranging
from 29-34 °C.
Long-tailed Sand Lizard
Latastia longicaudata Reuss, 1834
Vouchers: NMK-388L (field no. SK16 1027); NMK-385L
(field no. SK1034); NMK-384L (field no. SK1050)
Additional tissue samples: SK110.1 2016, SK142 2016,
SK158 2016, SK195 2016, SK233 2016, SK295 2017,
SK303 2017, SK305 2017, SK306 2017, SK352 2017,
SK481 2017
June 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1/2 | e324
Kirchhof et al.
Localities: AB (R, B, G), IL (R, B, G), KA (R, B), KF (R,
B), LO (R, B)
Remarks: We recorded 33 individuals of this common
diurnal lacertid (Fig. 4M) throughout the study period
on all transects between 0800 h and 1930 h. All lizards
were darting between bushes in search of prey and places
for hiding. Average T, was high at 37.8 + 1.2 °C (36.2—
39.5 °C; N = 8) at T.,, ranging from 31-65 °C and T,
ranging from 33-39 °C. The genus Latastia consists of
multiple similar-looking species and subspecies, and in
some cases, only the suspected distribution range allows
for identification. Rigorous genetic analysis 1s necessary
to update the taxonomic status, the distinguishing
morphological character traits, and the distribution
ranges of existing specimens.
Turkana Shield-backed Ground Lizard
Philochortus rudolfensis Parker, 1932
Vouchers: NMK-382L/1-2 (field nos. SK16 1048, SK89
2016)
Localities: AB (B)
Remarks: Only a limited number of records exist for this
species, and its exact range is therefore unknown -— it 1s
currently known from southern Ethiopia and northern
and central Kenya, at elevations below 800 m (Spawls et
al. 2018). During our survey, we found two individuals
(Fig. 4N) in a very dry and overgrazed area of the AB
bushland on compacted but not rocky substrate in the
late mornings of 15 and 16 November 2016. On the
same transect, Agama rueppelli, Latastia longicaudata,
Rhamphiophis rostrastus, Stenodactylus sthenodactylus,
and Trachylepis striata were also recorded.
Scincidae
Ocellated Skink
Chalcides bottegi Boulenger, 1898
Vouchers: NMK-389L (field no. SK16 1092)
Localities: KA (B), KF (G)
Remarks: This skink (Fig. 40) is known from dry savanna
and semi-desert in northern Kenya. We found only two
individuals of this semi-fossorial skink in KA and KF in
grassland and bushland, respectively. Both individuals
were active during the day, one was found under dead
reeds along the lake shore, and the other was digging into
the loose sand under a Commiphora africana shrub. The
body temperature of the individual under the reed was
34.9 °C at a substrate temperature of 34 °C (T, 37.5 °C).
These are the first Kenyan records from the eastern side
of Lake Turkana.
Sundevall’s Writhing Skink
Mochlus sundevallii (Smith, 1849)
Vouchers: NMK-397L/1-—4 (field nos. SK16 1035, SK16
1077, SK16 1090, SK16 1106)
Additional tissue samples: SK281 2016
Localities: IL (B, R), KA (R), KF (R, B, G), LO (B)
Remarks: A nocturnal, fossorial species that occupies
a variety of habitats comprising coastal savanna and
woodland, dry and moist savanna, semi-desert, and
medium to high-elevation woodland up to 2,000 m
(Spawls et al. 2018). Seventeen individuals of Mochlus
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
sundevallii (Fig. 4P) were found, all after sunset, digging
in soft sand under shrubs. Average T, was 33.9 + 1.0 °C
(32.7-34.9 °C; N = 4) at T., ranging from 29-30 °C and
T, ranged from 32-35 °C.
Striped Skink
Trachylepis striata (Peters, 1844)
Vouchers: NMK-379L/1-—5 (field nos. SK16 1036, SK16
1041, SK16 1052, SK16 1069, SK16 1107)
Localities: AB (B, L), IL (B), KA (B), KF (G)
Remarks: A recent study found Trachylepis striata (Fig.
4Q) to be paraphyletic, with Ethiopian individuals being
the sister group to Tanzanian individuals and 7? mlanjensis
(Loveridge, 1953) from Malawi (Weinell et al. 2019).
Kenyan specimens were not included in that study.
Extensive molecular analyses of individuals covering
the distribution ranges of these taxa will be necessary to
resolve their respective status. For now, Trachylepis striata
is considered a generalist skink, living in forest clearings,
coastal thicket, moist and dry savanna, semi-desert, and
urban areas (Spawils et al. 2018).
The 14 individuals of a diurnal skink found during this
study were assigned to 7’ striata sensu lato. All individuals
were discovered on the ground, although this species has
been referred to as arboreal (Spawls et al. 2018). The
majority of individuals were found under clumps of dead
reeds along the lake shore. Average T, was 34.7 + 0.4 °C
(34.4-35 °C; N = 2) at T., ranging from 34-40 °C and T,
was 34 °C,
Varanidae
Savannah Monitor
Varanus albigularis Daudin, 1802
CITES App. II
Vouchers: NMK-381L (field no. SK16 1108)
Localities: IL (R), AB (R)
Remarks: This monitor lizard 1s quite widespread across
Africa and occupies different habitats from dry and moist
savanna, coastal thicket and woodland, and semi-desert,
from sea level to 1,500 m elevation (Spawls et al. 2018). It
likely occurs across most of Kenya, but museum specimens
are scarce. The records of the rock or White-Throated
Monitor represent the first records for the eastern shore
of Lake Turkana, although there was hardly any doubt
the species occurred there. Three individuals were found
in December and April, comprising one adult and two
juveniles. The two juveniles (Fig. 4R) were found at night
sleeping on tree branches, one was exposed just lying atop
the branch at 2 m height, and one was hidden under bark
close to the ground. The adult individual was found in the
morning under the bark of a tree stem.
Nile Monitor
Varanus niloticus (Linnaeus, 1766)
CITES App. I
Vouchers: None
Localities: IL (G)
Remarks: The most widespread African lizard usually
lives near fresh water sources from sea level to around
1,600 m elevation, and rarely higher. We observed one
individual Nile Monitor walking along the shore of Lake
June 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1/2 | e324
The Herpetofauna of Sibiloi National Park, Kenya
Turkana in the early afternoon in December 2016. This
species might be under threat in some parts of Africa,
as it is exploited for its skin, particularly in West Africa,
but the proliferation of dams has provided extra habitat
for this species (Spawls et al. 2018). It is probably quite
common in SNP.
Serpentes
Boidae
Kenya Sand Boa
Eryx colubrinus (Linnaeus, 1758)
CITES App. II
Vouchers: NMK-372S (field no. SK16 1023)
Additional tissue samples: SK353 2017
Localities: AB (B), IL (B, R), KF (B), LO (B), TBI
Remarks: A typical inhabitant of arid and semi-arid areas
in north-eastern Africa (Spawls et al. 2018). The natural
history of the Sand Boa (Fig. 4S) is poorly known due
to its secretive fossorial lifestyle. We recorded seven
individuals. Six of them were active at night or at least
after sunset, and the other one recorded during daytime
was found at TBI at noon after rain. It was a large female
that was lying under a tree in the moist soil with its head
buried underground and its entire body exposed; however,
it was largely protected from direct sun by the shadow of
the tree. Individuals were recorded in November, March,
and April mainly in bushland, and only one individual
was found in a dry riverbed.
Colubridae
Smith’s Racer
Platyceps brevis (Boulenger, 1895)
Vouchers: NMK-373S (field no. SK16 1049)
Localities: AB (house wall)
Remarks: This racer occupies dry savanna and semi-desert
at elevations spanning 100—1,300 m (Spawls et al. 2018).
In the early afternoon (1400 h) of 16 November 2016,
we collected a specimen of this species (Fig. 4T) coming
out of a crevice in the wall of one of the buildings in the
Alia Bay grasslands. Only limited information is known
about this species and records are still sparse, leading to
a fragmented currently-known distribution range (Spawls
et al. 2018).
Psammophiidae
Tanganyika Sand Snake
Psammophis cf. tanganicus Loveridge, 1940
Vouchers: NMK-370S (field no. SK16 1093)
Records: KA (B)
Remarks: A slim grey sand snake very similar to
Psammophis biseriatus, of which it was originally
described as a subspecies. Its taxonomic status will remain
unresolved without thorough genetic and morphological
analyses covering their entire ranges. According to
Loveridge (1940) the only character separating P.
biseriatus biseriatus from P. b. tanganicus [sic] is the
number of labial scales entering the orbit (two in P. b.
biseriatus vs. three in P. b. tanganicus [sic]). Specimen
NMK-370S has nine labials and the 4", 5", and 6" are
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
in contact with the orbit. Labials are not plain white but
rather largely blotched in light brown. This poorly known
snake occurs from sea level to about 1,300 m in dry
savanna and semi-desert, but the known Kenyan records
are few and very scattered (Spawils et al. 2018). We found
only one individual (Fig. 4U) in the bushland at Karare
in the evening of 2 December 2016 right at sunset. It was
actively moving on the ground, but immediately climbed
into a shrub when disturbed. If the specimen proves to be
P. tanganicus this will be the first record from the Lake
Turkana area. Genetic analyses are necessary to resolve
the taxonomic status of P. biseriatus and P. tanganicus.
Speckled Sand Snake
Psammophis punctulatus Duméril,
Dumeéril, 1854
Vouchers: NMK-S4604 (field no. SK1113)
Records: AB (R), KF (museum headquarters)
Remarks: This common diurnal snake is widely distributed.
We found one adult and one juvenile individual in Koobi
Fora and Alia Bay in the vegetation along the riverbed
and in the Koobi Fora camp, both in April. The large adult
individual (Fig. 4V) was feeding on a weaver bird when
found (Kirchhof et al. 2018). The currently accepted
subspecies P. p. punctulatus and P. p. trivirgatus (to which
the SNP specimens were assigned) seem to be parapatric
and morphologically distinguishable, and they might both
prove to be full species in the future.
Bibron, and
Rufous Beaked Snake
Rhamphiophis rostratus Peters, 1854
Vouchers: NMK-368S (field no. SK16 1051)
Localities: AB (B)
Remarks: This diurnal snake inhabits semi-desert, dry and
moist savanna, coastal thicket, and woodland up to 1,500
m (Spawls et al. 2018). We recorded this large terrestrial
snake only once (Fig. 4W) in bushland at Alia Bay in
November 2016 at night.
Elapidae
Red Spitting Cobra
Naja pallida Boulenger, 1896
Vouchers: NMK-367S (field no. SK16 1047)
Localities: KA (R), KF (G, R)
Remarks: This spitting cobra is another typical occupant
of semi-deserts and dry savannas (Spawils et al. 2018). In
November 2016, we found three individuals of the gray-
phased Naja pallida (Fig. 4X). All were active after sunset
at Koobi Fora and Karare. One was found in grassland
near the lake shore, and the other two were foraging in
dry riverbeds.
Viperidae
Puff Adder
Bitis arietans (Merrem, 1820)
Vouchers: NMK-369S (field no. SK16 1102)
Localities: IL (R)
Remarks: We recorded one individual (Fig. 4Y) of this
large and widely distributed viper at night in December
2016 among the Vachellia sp. trees in a dry riverbed.
June 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1/2 | e324
Kirchhof et al.
‘TROL, ‘JOL, ‘pueyysng ‘g {poqioAl “Y Spuvjssess “H “eIsowo’T ‘—O'T ‘dW yI] “TI ‘resIe yy ‘({B1OL, JOT, ‘pueyysng “g “paqJoAls “Y Spuvylsseis DH
‘VY ‘e10y Iqooy “Fy SAeg PITY “GV :SuUOneIADIQqY ‘S}OOSUBI] DY} JO 9UO JO SoS POADAINS “D) syoosuvl] pue (VISOWO'T ‘O’'T ‘dWIOyI] “TI ‘esey “vy “eso, Iqooy “py ‘Aeg eITV bel
dy} JO QUO JOYS ye puNOJ ATSAISN[OXS 919M Jey) Sorsods uviqrydue Jo sSIOqUINN °g “SITY “qV) sous ADAINS OY} SSOIOB SoIdads ULIqIydWe papsOSdI XIS dy} JO SDUDIINIIO *L “SI my
aus Apnig ays Apnis 5
yasues, dwey lal O1 al) WA dy av WLOL r=
3 : ; ‘ r 9 0 | 0 [ 0 fn) I i) i 0 ) | 0 i ) : 3
q 2 g q 9 q q 2) q me,
a o1 WH av : N
T T T T T T T @
4 4OL Y 4OL uy | yoL =
LZ =
ee Zz z Zz S
T T = uo 9) 3 —_
11 4 3 z QI
io” € oO N
g € € € € 3 a
iF }OL yO, }OL 5 o oO
% i =
8 > me 32
+28 ¥ i
z
lat r gs
9
9
€ 30]
Ad,
‘TROL ‘OL -pueyysnq : (4 ¢ (4 ¢ (4 ¢ (4 5
‘q ‘paqiaall “Y ‘puvyssess “H ‘anjnsuy ulseg eueYIN], ‘Tq I “eIsowoy ‘OT ‘a1oway]] “TI ([e10], JOL, :puerysng “g ‘poqioals “Y :pueysses “H) Joosuey Aq pue (o)NIVsSU]
‘oIVIey “WY ‘B10 Iqooy “Py ‘Avg PITY “GV ‘SUOTIEIADIQGY ‘s}oosUe dU} JO UO IO SaqIS ieee Ye TEL Bou TO 1 a te TT eal Wake ed OS ae ‘Keg
poAdAINs dy} JO DUO JOYITA ye PUNO} AJAAISNOXS d19M Je} Sar1dads ayd91 Jo SIOQUINN *9 “SIH BITV “@V) Sous AoArns oy} ssosoe sarseds a]dos pops0dE1 BZ SY} JO S9USIINIIO *¢ “SIA
ays ApN|S
ays Apis ial Wy WILOL
pesuedl dwey !
a
Zz
: =
3 ©
ion =
® gS
3 OL Q, n
ie) in =
2. 10) 10] JO] oH ro)
o 10] )
2
=
2
®
a
re
ic
E
Ls yo, (OE xt
The Herpetofauna of Sibiloi National Park, Kenya
Table 1. List of the amphibian and reptile taxa recorded at Sibiloi National Park, and additional sites along the eastern shore of
Lake Turkana south to Mount Kulal, during the present study and from Ziliani et al. (2016). The list does not include Psammophis
semivariegatus, which is listed by Ziliani et al. (2006), as this taxon does not exist. We assume that this name refers to Philothamnus
semivariegatus (Smith, 1840) which was listed as Philothamus semivariegatus. We here use the species names as used in Ziliani
et al. (2016). Some of these names have undergone taxonomic changes by now, for others we could not find out which taxon was
referred to (indicated with (?)), and sometimes the taxon name was misspelled (indicated with [sic]).
This study Ziliani et al. (2006)*
AMPHIBIA
Bufonidae
Poyntonophrynus lughensis (Loveridge, 1932) x Bufo lughensis
Sclerophrys xeros (Tandy, Tandy, Keith, and Duff-MacKay, 1976) x -
Sclerophrys turkanae (Tandy and Feener, 1985) x Bufo turkanae
Sclerophrys cf. gutturalis (Power, 1927) = Bufo cf. gutturalis (Mt. Kulal)
Ptychadenidae
Ptychadena nilotica (Seetzen, 1855) x Ptychadena mascareniensis (?)
Ptychadena anchietae (Bocage, 1868) — Ptychadena anchietae
Ptychadena cf. schillukorum (Werner, 1907) x —
Ptychadena cf. taenioscelis Laurent, 1954 — Ptychadena cf. taenioscelis
Pyxicephalidae
Tomopterna wambensis Wasonga and Channing, 2013 x Tomopterna cryptotis (?)
REPTILIA
Pelomedusidae
Pelomedusa neumanni Petzold, Vargas-Ramirez, Kehlmaier, Pelomedusa subrufa
Vamberger, Branch, Du Preez, Hofmeyr, Meyer, Schleicher, Siroky, —
and Fritz, 2014
Pelusios broadleyi Bour, 1986 = Pelusios broadleyi
Testudinidae
Malacochersus tornieri (Siebenrock, 1903) = Malacochersus tornieri (Mt. Kulal)
Trionychidae
Trionyx triunguis (Forskal, 1775) 4 Trionyx triunguis
Crocodylidae
Crocodylus niloticus Laurenti, 1768 x Crocodylus niloticus
Agamidae
Agama lionotus Boulenger, 1896 x Agama agama lionotus
Agama rueppelli Vaillant, 1882 x Agama rueppelli
Chamaeleonidae
Trioceros bitaeniatus (Fischer, 1884) = Chamaeleo bitaeniatus (Mt. Kulal)
Trioceros narraioca (Necas, Modry, and Slapeta, 2003) = Chamaeleo narrayioca [sic] (Mt. Kulal)
Eublepharidae
Holodactylus africanus Boettger, 1893 x -
Gekkonidae
Hemidactylus angulatus Hallowell, 1852 xe Hemidactylus brooki (?)
Hemidactylus barbierii Sindaco, Razzetti, and Ziliani, 2007 x Hemidactylus n. sp.
Hemidactylus lanzai Smid, Mazuch, Novakova, Modry, Malonza, Elmi, Hemidactylus isolepis
Carranza, and Moravec, 2020 *
Hemidactylus macropholis Boulenger, 1896 = Hemidactylus macropholis
Hemidactylus platycephalus Peters, 1854 = Hemidactylus platycephalus
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 12 June 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1/2 | e324
Kirchhof et al.
Table 1 Continued. List of the amphibian and reptile taxa recorded at Sibiloi National Park, and additional sites along the eastern
shore of Lake Turkana south to Mount Kulal, during the present study and from Ziliani et al. (2016). The list does not include
Psammophis semivariegatus, which is listed by Ziliani et al. (2006), as this taxon does not exist. We assume that this name refers
to Philothamnus semivariegatus (Smith, 1840) which was listed as Philothamus semivariegatus. We here use the species names as
used in Ziliani et al. (2016). Some of these names have undergone taxonomic changes by now, for others we could not find out which
taxon was referred to (indicated with (?)), and sometimes the taxon name was misspelled (indicated with [sic]).
This study Ziliani et al. (2006)*
Hemidactylus ruspolii Boulenger, 1896 x Hemidactylus ruspolii
Homopholis fasciata (Boulenger, 1890) xX -
Lygodactylus keniensis Parker, 1936 _ Lygodactylus kenyensis [sic]
Lygodactylus somalicus Loveridge, 1935 x Lygodactylus cf. somalicus
Stenodactylus sthenodactylus (Lichtenstein, 1823) x Stenodactylus sthenodactylus
Gerrhosauridae
Gerrhosaurus flavigularis Wiegmann, 1828 = Gerrhosaurus flavigularis (Mt. Kulal)
Lacertidae
Heliobolus spekii (Gunther, 1872) xX Heliobolus spekii
Latastia longicaudata Reuss, 1834 x Latastia longicaudata
Philochortus rudolfensis Parker, 1932 x -
Pseuderemias smithi (Boulenger, 1895) — Pseuderemias smithi
Scincidae
Panaspis sp. — Afroblepharus sp.
Chalcides bottegi Boulenger, 1898 x Chalcides ocellatus bottegi
Mochlus sundevallii (Smith, 1849) J Lygosoma sundevalli [sic] and
Lygosoma afrum (Mt. Kulal)
Trachylepis quinquetaeniata (Lichtenstein, 1823) eS Mabuya quinquetaeniata
Trachylepis striata (Peters, 1844) x Mabuya striata
Trachylepis varia (Peters, 1867) = Mabuya varia
Varanidae
Varanus albigularis Daudin, 1802. x -
Varanus niloticus (Linnaeus, 1766) x —
Atractaspididae
Aparallactus lunulatus (Peters, 1854) = Apparalactus lunulatus [sic] (Mt. Kulal)
Boidae
Eryx colubrinus (Linnaeus, 1758) x Eryx colubrinus
Colubridae
Crotaphopeltis hotamboeia (Laurenti, 1768) 4 Crotaphopeltis hotamboeia (Mt. Kulal)
Dasypeltis scabra (Linnaeus, 1758) = Dasypeltis scabra (Mt. Kulal)
Dispholidus typus (Smith, 1829) = Dispholidus typus (Mt. Kulal)
Philothamnus semivariegatus (Smith, 1840) 2 Philothamus semivariegatus [sic] (Mt.
Kulal)
Platyceps brevis (Boulenger, 1895) x Platyceps brevis smithi
Platyceps florulentus (Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1827) = Platyceps florulentus florulentus
Telescopus obtusus (Reuss, 1834) — Telescopus dhara
Elapidae
Naja haje (Linnaeus, 1758) = Naja haie [sic] (Mt. Kulal)
Naja pallida Boulenger, 1896 x Naja pallida
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 13 June 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1/2 | e324
The Herpetofauna of Sibiloi National Park, Kenya
Table 1 Continued. List of the amphibian and reptile taxa recorded at Sibiloi National Park, and additional sites along the eastern
shore of Lake Turkana south to Mount Kulal, during the present study and from Ziliani et al. (2016). The list does not include
Psammophis semivariegatus, which is listed by Ziliani et al. (2006), as this taxon does not exist. We assume that this name refers
to Philothamnus semivariegatus (Smith, 1840) which was listed as Philothamus semivariegatus. We here use the species names as
used in Ziliani et al. (2016). Some of these names have undergone taxonomic changes by now, for others we could not find out which
taxon was referred to (indicated with (?)), and sometimes the taxon name was misspelled (indicated with [sic]).
Lamprophiidae
Boaedon fuliginosus (Boie, 1827)
Lycophidion sp.
Leptotyphlopidae
Myriopholis macrorhyncha (Jan, 1860)
Psammophiidae
Psammophis biseriatus (Peters, 1881)
Psammophis punctulatus Duméril, Bibron, and Dumeéril, 1854
Psammophis cf. tanganicus Loveridge, 1940
Rhamphiophis rostratus Peters, 1854
Rhamphiophis rubropunctatus (Fischer, 1884)
Viperidae
Bitis arietans (Merrem, 1820)
Echis pyramidum (Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1827)
North-east African Carpet Viper
Echis pyramidum (Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1827)
Vouchers: NMK-374S (field no. SK16 1025); NMK-371S
(field no. SK16 1149)
Additional tissue samples: SKO51 2016
Localities: AB (B, R), IL (B, R), KA (B), KF (B, G, R),
LO (R)
Remarks: The most common snake in SNP during our
expeditions was Echis pyramidum, with 38 individuals
recorded. This species (Fig. 4Z) occurred at all our study
sites and in all transect types, but with a predilection for
bushland (26 records). Activity was restricted to the night
time, and records during daytime were exclusively of
resting individuals dug out under dead logs.
Camp and Transect Comparisons
Of the 28 reptile species, 11 were recorded in the grasslands
along the lake shore (of those, P brevis was not recorded
in natural habitat but on the wall of a building), 19 in the
dry riverbeds, and 21 in bushland. The species diversity
of the different sites were very similar (16-17 species per
site) when the sites with similar collecting effort were
compared, 1.e., Lomosia with 10 species was only surveyed
in March-April 2017, and species at TBI were recorded
opportunistically (Fig. 5). The species found only at one site
comprised four at Alia Bay (Agama lionotus, Philochortus
rudolfensis, Platyceps brevis, Rhamphiophis rostratus),
One species at Koobi Fora (7rionyx triunguis), two
species at Karare (Hemidactylus barbierii, Psammophis
cf. tanganicus), and two at Ilkemere (Bitis arietans,
Varanus niloticus) (Fig. 6). Philochortus rudolfensis, P.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
This study Ziliani et al. (2006)*
= Lamprophis fuliginosus (Mt. Kulal)
— Lycophidion sp. (Mt. Kulal)
= Leptotyphlops machrorhynchus
_ Psammophis biseriatus (Mt. Kulal)
x Psammophis cf. punctulatus
x J
3 /
Rhamphiophis rubropunctatus
4 Bitis arietans
x Echis pyramidum
cf. tanganicus, and R. rostratus (and the Trionyx triunguis
carapace) were found only on bushland transects; A.
lionotus, B. arietans, Hemidactylus barbierii, and Varanus
albigularis occurred exclusively in dry riverbeds; and P.
brevis and V. niloticus were only found in the grassland
transects at IIkemere and Alia Bay, respectively (Fig. 6).
Most of the six species of amphibians (four species;
Ptychadena nilotica, Ptychadena cf. schillukorum,
Sclerophrys turkanae, and Tomopterna wambensis; Fig.
7) were found in the dry riverbeds, especially after rains.
Three amphibian species were recorded in grasslands. Of
those, P. nilotica and S. turkanae were found in the highly
alkaline (pH = 9.2) and saline (TDS = 2,500 ppm; Yuretich
and Cerling 1983) water of Lake Turkana. The fossorial
7. wambensis either appeared from out of its underground
hiding place away from the waters after rain, or it was calling
at sites away from the lake at the edges of confined water
bodies, which were most probably fed mainly by the high
levels of groundwater and rain water. Of the three species
recorded at TBI, 7) wambensis and Poyntonophrynus
lughensis were mating in a freshly flooded temporary
waterbody after heavy rains in bushland, while Sclerophrys
xeros was sitting in the artificial water reservoir of the
station. Only a single individual of P. cf. schillukorum was
found in a dry riverbed at Ilkemere (Fig. 8).
Discussion
The results of two herpetological surveys inthe SNP along
parts of the eastern shore of Lake Turkana in northern
Kenya are presented here. In addition to the records of
28 reptiles and six amphibians from these surveys, a
June 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1/2 | e324
Kirchhof et al.
checklist of the herpetofauna in an extended area east of
Lake Turkana from the Ethiopian border in the north, east
to the town of North Horr, and south to Mount Kulal was
presented at the 6" Congresso Nazionale della Societas
Herpetologica Italica in Rome, Italy in 2006 (Ziliani et
al 2006). Our surveys added seven species of reptiles
and two amphibians that were not found during the 10
herpetological surveys conducted by Ziliani et al. (2006),
despite their coverage of a larger range and spending
more time. These nine species are: Holodactylus
africanus, | Homopholis fasciata, — Philochortus
rudolfensis, Psammophis cf. tanganicus, Ptychadena
cf. schillukorum, Rhamphiophis rostratus, Sclerophrys
xeros, Varanus albigularis, and Varanus niloticus.
Thirteen reptile species and two amphibians recorded by
Ziliani et al. (2006) in xeric habitats were not detected
in our surveys. Most likely these taxa also find suitable
habitat in SNP and are expected to occur there (Table
1). We did not consider the species that were recorded
by Ziliani et al. (2006) in the very ecologically different,
more mesic vegetation types, including the afromontane
forest remnants at Mount Kulal (14 species, excluding
Lygosoma afrum, currently considered a synonym of M.
sundevallii and Psammophis semivariegatus, which does
not exist and is likely Philothamnus semivariegatus;
Table 1).
Among the unique environmental features of the
area for the local herpetofauna are (i) Lake Turkana, a
permanent water source in this semi-desert, with a high
pH and high salinity (for aquatic animals) and (11) the
terrestrial shoreline of the lake with localized grass-
dominated habitats. Our results show the lowest species
diversity in those grasslands, a fact that was unexpected.
However, the grasslands seem to be experiencing the
highest impact from local livestock overgrazing. In
addition, the prolonged droughts in the area likely affect
the grasslands through changes in the flooding regime
and seasonal lake-level fluctuations. Along the shore, the
four species that were not recorded anywhere else can
apparently withstand the rather inhospitable chemical
conditions of the lake water. Those four species are:
Crocodylus niloticus, except for one individual that was
found a little further inland near one of our bushland
transects; Varanus niloticus, a monitor lizard that lives
close to water; Platyceps brevis, this species is not aquatic
and was recorded in anthropogenic habitat between the
stones of the wall of a building; and the toad Sclerophrys
turkanae. Furthermore, although they were not recorded
alive during our expeditions, three aquatic species of
turtles and terrapins (Pelusios broadleyi, Pelomedusa
subrufa [sic], now P. neumanni, and Trionyx triunguis)
are restricted to the lake (Ziliani et al. 2006). These
species are subject to fishing pressure, and they often
end up as bycatch, are disturbed by fishermen, become
entangled in nets, or take baited fishing hooks and drown
(IUCN World Heritage Outlook 2020).
The dry riverbeds also represent an important
habitat, especially in such a dry area, mainly due to
their high groundwater levels which are mandatory for
the trees growing in the narrow riparian woodlands
along the river. Consequently, we found most of the
amphibian species in the riverbeds (Pitychadena nilotica,
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Ptychadena cf. schillukorum, Sclerophrys turkanae, and
Tomopterna wambensis), as well as the more or less
arboreal reptile species (Agama lionotus, Hemidactylus
barbierii, Hemidactylus ruspolii, Homopholis fasciata,
and Lygodactylus somalicus), although many of the latter
also inhabited the shrubs in the bushland. Furthermore,
the three individuals of Varanus albigularis were found
exclusively along the riverbeds under loose bark of trees.
The number of individuals we recorded 1s not acompletely
accurate representation of abundance because not every
individual encountered was caught and marked. As a
result, on each second surveying day per transect there
was a possibility of re-recording of individuals.
In addition to the aforementioned aquatic and
arboreal species, the recorded herpetofauna of the
SNP comprises species typical of the semi-arid to arid
savannas of East Africa. A few of the species, such
as Bitis arietans, Heliobolus spekii, Hemidactylus
platycephalus, — Homopholis _ fasciata, | Mochlus
sundevallii, Rhamphiophis rostratus, R. rubropunctatus,
Trachylepis quinquetaeniata, T. striata, T: varia, and
Varanus albigularis, are widespread and generalist, also
inhabiting moist and dry savanna areas. These species
are generally distributed further to the south and enter
parts of Central Africa. Furthermore, a few Palearctic
taxa reach the Turkana area, such as Echis pyramidum
and Stenodactylus sthenodactylus, as well as the largely
Palearctic genus Eryx which is represented in SNP by E.
colubrinus.
Environmental Changes over Recent Decades
Recently, the area around SNP has received more
attention from biologists and conservationists than in
the past (e.g., Cabeza et al. 2016; Conenna et al. 2019;
Junqueira et al. 2021; Torrents-Ticé et al. 2021). The
overall outcomes and impressions of these various
studies are that throughout the past decades, the xeric
areas in northern Kenya, including Lake Turkana and
SNP, have been facing severe anthropogenic pressures.
A 2 °C rise in minimum and maximum temperatures
between 1967 and 2012 in the Turkana area has been
reported (Avery 2012), as well as changes in the
intensity and frequency of rainy seasons and increased
duration and frequency of severe droughts (Junqueira
et al. 2021). Ethnographic studies also report that the
Daasanach people in the area have perceived increases
in temperature and wind strength, drier and less fertile
soils, less grass and increased water salinity (Junqueira et
al. 2021). Photographic evidence from the 1960s shows
that there was once a rich mammalian fauna in SNP, with
giraffes, lions, and cheetahs, all of which are now locally
extirpated (IUCN World Heritage Outlook 2020), and the
local elders reported fertile and green pastures for their
livestock in the past (Cabeza et al. 2016). Herders also
report changes in the population trends of many of the
mammals in the area (Torrents-Tico et al. 2021). Whether
these changes are also affecting the herpetofauna of SNP
is less clear, since most reptiles and amphibians are less
targeted by the local population than the mammals.
Nevertheless, changes in the lake water levels and
increased anthropogenic pressures with negative impacts
June 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1/2 | e324
The Herpetofauna of Sibiloi National Park, Kenya
on the vegetation cover (shade), insect abundance (reptile
and amphibian prey), ground water levels, and land use
practices (agro-pastoralism, fishing), are likely to have
already impacted the diversity and abundance of reptile
and amphibian species.
Our results show that the majority of the herpetofauna
of the SNP comprises desert and semi-desert taxa.
Museum specimens are very rare for the eastern shore
of Lake Turkana, which motivated us to collect voucher
specimens of the local herpetofauna for the NMK
collection to serve as a baseline for future generations
of conservationists and biologists. The reptile and
amphibian species recorded at Mount Kulal, which is
about 100 km south of SNP and covered by afromontane
forest remnants and mesophilous vegetation formations,
show a herpetofauna community comprising species
that typically occur in mesic savannas and _ forests
further to the south and west, e.g., Bufo (Sclerophrys)
gutturalis, Crotaphopeltis hotamboeia, Dispholidus
typus, Gerrhosaurus flavigularis, and Philothamus
semivariegatus [sic] (Philothamnus semivariegatus)
(Ziliani et al. 2006). These species seem to represent
relict populations for the area, and they were likely to
be more widespread under the less severe environmental
conditions which were reportedly still prevalent in the
Turkana region less than 50 years ago (Cabeza et al.
2016; Junqueira et al. 2021; Torrents-Tico et al. 2021).
The opportunistically recorded field body temperatures
of some of the species (see Species Accounts) were not
exceptionally high, so we assume that at least those
taxa were able to effectively thermoregulate in the SNP
despite the increased environmental temperatures (Avery
2012).
Conclusions
The SNP harbors a high diversity of reptiles, and also a
decent amount of amphibian taxa for a xeric environment,
and many of these taxa are poorly studied. During two
surveys, a number of species were found for the first time
in SNP, although none of them were unexpected based on
their known ecology and distribution ranges. There are
probably some more species to discover in the area, and
splitting taxa based on molecular analyses might further
extend the species list. Based on the present survey and
the expeditions by Ziliani et al. (2006), the currently
known reptile and amphibian fauna of the SNP comprises
A9 species, including eight amphibians and 41 reptiles
(three freshwater turtles, one crocodile, 25 lizards, and
12 snakes).
The herpetofauna includes species typical of the semi-
arid to arid savannas of East Africa (including arboreal
taxa), a few taxa with more Palearctic distributions, a
few widespread and generalist taxa that also inhabit
more humid areas, and the aquatic species dependent on
Lake Turkana. The latter group comprises four reptile
species listed on CITES App. II and two reptile species
listed on the IUCN Red List, highlighting the importance
of the lake for the Reptilia. These species are also the
most likely group to be affected if the water resources,
including the amount of available water and the chemistry
of the lake, are negatively impacted by climate change
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
and the Gilgel Gibe III Dam in Ethiopia. In addition, the
habitats associated with the ephemeral rivers that have
high groundwater levels and riparian woodlands/forests,
which are home to most amphibian species and many
reptile species, will be heavily affected if water levels
drop. The grassy habitats along the lake shore seem
to be impacted by overgrazing and now harbor fewer
reptile and amphibian species than expected. Overall, the
herpetofauna of this area includes a number of CITES
and IUCN Red List listed species, including endemics,
that warrant protection and conservation measures to
prevent further defaunation.
Acknowledgments.—We thank the National
Commission for Science, Technology, and Innovation
(NACOSTI/P/16/21446/14491) and Kenya Wildlife
Service (KWS/BRM/5001) for granting access to the
area, and the Turkana Basin Institute (TBI) for all their
logistic support. This study has received funding from the
Nordenskidld Expedition fund (granted to Mar Cabeza,
University of Helsinki), and funds for the promotion
and support of young researchers from the Museum fir
Naturkunde Berlin (Germany) (granted to Sebastian
Kirchhof). The authors wish to thank Mikael Fortelius
and Mar Cabeza (both at University of Helsinki) for
offering the opportunity to join the two expeditions to
SNP, and Shooro Claudia Goosh, Lawrence Losogo
Bosco, Irene Conenna, the Helsinki team, and the TBI
team for their field assistance, team spirit, general help,
and company. Mar Cabeza also added helpful comments
to the manuscript. Special thanks go to Eli Greenbaum
for his suggestions which improved the article.
Literature Cited
Avery S. 2012. Lake Turkana and the Lower Omo:
Hydrological Impacts of Major Dam and Irrigation
Developments. Report. African Studies Centre,
University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
239 p.
BirdLife International. 2022. Important Bird Areas
factsheet: Lake Turkana. Available at: http://www.
birdlife.org [Accessed: 1 November 2022].
Cabeza M, Fernandez-Llamazares A, Fraixedas S,
Lopez-Baucells A, Burgas D, Rocha R, Ajiko A.
2016. Winds of hope for Sibiloi1 National Park.
Swara 4: 33-37.
Ceriaco L, Marques MP, Bandeira S, Agarwal I, Stanley
EL, Bauer AM, Heinicke MP, Blackburn DC. 2018.
A new earless species of Poyntonophrynus (Anura,
Bufonidae) from the Serra da Neve Inselberg,
Namibe Province, Angola. ZooKeys 780: 109-136.
Channing A, Howell K. 2006. Amphibians of East
Africa. Comstock Publishing Associates/Cornell
University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA. 418 p. +
24 pl.
Conenna I, Lopez-Baucells A, Rocha R, Ripperger S,
Cabeza M. 2019. Movement seasonality in a desert-
dwelling bat revealed by miniature GPS loggers.
Movement Ecology 7(1): 1-10.
Cox N, Young BE, Bowles P, Fernandez M, Marin
J, Rapacciuolo G, Bohm M, Brooks T, Hedges
June 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1/2 | e324
Kirchhof et al.
SB, Hilton-Taylor C, et al. 2022. A global reptile
assessment highlights shared conservation needs of
tetrapods. Nature 605(7909): 285-290.
Frost DR. 2022. Amphibian Species of the World: an
Online Reference. Version 6.1. American Museum
of Natural History, New York, New York, USA.
Available: https://amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org/
index.php [Accessed: 1 April 2022].
IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group. 2016.
Sclerophrys turkanae. The IUCN Red List of
Threatened Species 2016: e.T54784A 107351510.
IUCN World Heritage Outlook. 2020. Lake Turkana
National Parks - 2020 Conservation Outlook
Assessment. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Available:
https://rris.biopama.org/node/20655 [Accessed: 2
November 2022].
Junqueira AB, Fernandez-Llamazares A, Torrents-
Ticéd M, Haira PL, Nasak JG, Burgas D, Fraixedas
S, Cabeza M, Reyes-Garcia V. 2021. Interactions
between climate change and infrastructure projects
in changing water resources: an ethnobiological
perspective from the Daasanach, Kenya. Journal of
Ethnobiology 41(3): 331-348.
Kaiyage S, Nyagahn N. 2009. Socio-economic
Analysis and Public Consultation of Lake Turkana
Communities in Northern Kenya. Final Report.
African Development Bank, Tunis, Tunisia. 191 p.
Kirchhof S, Losogo LB, Malonza PK. 2018.
Psammophis punctulatus trivirgatus (Southern
Speckled Sand Snake). Diet. Herpetological Review
49(3): 552-553.
Largen MJ, Spawls S. 2010. The Amphibians and
Reptiles of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Frankfurt
Contributions to Natural History, Volume 38. Edition
Chimaira, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 693 p.
Largen MJ. 2001. Catalogue of the amphibians of
Ethiopia, including a key for their identification.
Tropical Zoology 14(2): 307-402.
Liedtke HC, Muller H, Hafner J, Penner J, Gower DJ,
Mazuch T, Rodel MO, Loader SP. 2017. Terrestrial
reproduction as an adaptation to steep terrain in
African toads. Proceedings of the Royal Society B:
Biological Sciences 284(1851): 20162598.
Loveridge A. 1940. Revision of the African snakes of
the genera Dromophis and Psammophis. Bulletin of
the Museum of Comparative Zoology 87(1): 1-69.
Mbaluka JK, Brown FH. 2016. Vegetation of the Koobi
Fora Region northeast of Lake Turkana, Marsabit
County, northern Kenya. Journal of East African
Natural History 105(1): 21-50.
Nago SGA, Grell O, Sinsin B, R6del MO. 2006. The
amphibian fauna of the Pendjari National Park and
surroundings, northern Benin. Salamandra 42: 93-
108.
Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED, Burgess
ND, Powell GV, Underwood EC, D’ Amicao JA, Itoua
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
I, Strand HE, Kassem KR, et al. 2001. Terrestrial
ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth.
A new global map of terrestrial ecoregions provides
an innovative tool for conserving biodiversity.
BioScience 51: 933-938.
Sindaco R, Razzetti E, Ziliani U, Wasonga V, Carugati
C, Fasola M. 2007. A new species of Hemidactylus
from Lake Turkana, northern Kenya (Squamata:
Gekkonidae). Acta Herpetologica 2: 37-48.
Spawls S, Howell K, Hinkel H, Menegon M. 2018.
Field Guide to East African Reptiles. Bloomsbury
Publishing, London, United Kingdom. 624 p.
Spawls S, Wasonga V, Drewes RC. 2019. The
Amphibians of Kenya. Stephen Spawls (privately
published). 55 p.
Tolley KA, Alexander GJ, Branch WR, Bowles P,
Maritz B. 2016. Conservation status and threats
for African reptiles. Biological Conservation 204:
63-71.
Thorsell J. 2003. World Heritage Nomination-IUCN
Technical Evaluation. ulissat Icefjord (Denmark)
ID No: 1149. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. 5 p.
Torrents-Tico M, Fernandez-Llamazares A
Burgas D, Cabeza M. 2021. Convergences and
divergences between scientific and indigenous and
local knowledge contribute to inform carnivore
conservation. Ambio 50(5): 990—1,002.
Uetz P, Freed P, Aguilar R, HoSek J. (Editors). 2022.
The Reptile Database. Available: http://www. reptile-
database.org [Accessed: 1 April 2022].
UNEP-WCMC, IUCN. 2022. Protected Planet: The
World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) and
World Database on Other Effective Area-based
Conservation Measures (WD-OECM). UNEP-
WCMC, Cambridge, United Kingdom and IUCN,
Gland, Switzerland. Available: http://www.
protectedplanet.net [Accessed: 10 July 2022].
Weinell JL, Branch WR, Colston TJ, Jackman TR, Kuhn
A, Conradie W, Bauer AM. 2019. A species-level
phylogeny of Trachylepis (Scincidae: Mabuyinae)
provides insight into their reproductive mode
evolution. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
136: 183-195.
Yuretich RF, Cerling TE. 1983. Hydrogeochemistry
of Lake Turkana, Kenya: mass balance and mineral
reactions in an alkaline lake. Geochimica et
Cosmochimica Acta 47(6): 1,099-1,109.
Ziliani U, Sindaco R, Razzetti E, Wasonga V, Modry
D, Necas P, Carugati C, Fasola M. 2006. The
Herpetofauna of the Eastern Side of the Lake
Turkana (Northern Kenya). Pp. 192-193 In:
Riassunti del 6° Congresso Nazionale della Societas
Herpetologica Italica (Roma, 27.IX-1.X.2006).
Editors, Bologna MA, Capula M, Carpaneto GM,
Luiselli L, Marangoni C, Venchi A. Stiligrafica,
Rome, Italy. 238 p.
9
June 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1/2 | e324
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
The Herpetofauna of Sibiloi National Park, Kenya
Sebastian Kirchhof is a research associate at New York University Abu Dhabi working
in close collaboration with the Museum fiir Naturkunde Berlin, Germany, where he
received his Ph.D. Sebastian 1s a trained ecologist, nature conservationist, and biologist,
currently focusing on genomic adaptation to extreme conditions in amphibians and
reptiles by combining genomics, transcriptomics, niche modeling, population genomics,
and systematics. He is interested in the evolutionary processes responsible for the
diversification of Earth’s biota and genomic architecture, and how they affect speciation
rates. This knowledge is one of the fundamental pillars for the protection of the Earth’s
biodiversity.
Victor Wasonga is a trained conservation biologist and a research scientist based at the
National Museums of Kenya. Victor’s current research involves using herpetofauna to
understand phylogeny, taxonomy, ecology, distribution, landuse, ecosystem dynamics,
and livelihoods. He has authored many publications and described a number of species.
Victor is currently serving as a Co-Chair of the East African Amphibian Specialist Group
within IUCN’s Species Survival Commission.
Tomas Mazuch is a Czech amateur herpetologist. Since his teenage years, Toma’ has
dedicated his life to the breeding of amphibians, reptiles, and invertebrates. During
his studies of Veterinary Sciences (which are not finished yet), he began to devote his
research to herpetology and the parasitology of reptiles. His research focuses on the
taxonomy, systematics, and biogeography of amphibians and reptiles of the Horn of
Africa (mainly Somalia and Ethiopia). His main subjects of study are geckos of the
genus Hemidactylus from Eastern Africa. Tomas is also interested in the taxonomy
of scorpions and succulent plants from North-Eastern Africa. He has authored or co-
authored about 30 peer-reviewed papers and books on parasitology, the systematics
of scorpions, plants, and herpetology, including the book Amphibians and Reptiles of
Somaliland and Eastern Ethiopia, Based on Two Field Trips in 2010/2011 in 2013. He
has co-authored the descriptions of 11 reptile, six scorpion and two plant species. He
currently runs long-term projects and field studies in Somaliland.
Stephen Spawls is an independent herpetologist who has worked extensively in Africa,
in Kenya, Egypt, Ghana, Botswana, and Ethiopia. His publications include A Field
Guide to the Reptiles of East Africa and a book on Africa’s dangerous snakes. He lives
in Norwich, United Kingdom.
Patrick Kinyatta Malonza has been a herpetologist at the National Museums of Kenya-
Nairobi since 1996, where he leads a team of other herpetologists and enthusiasts to
promote reptile and amphibian conservation in Kenya. Patrick works on the taxonomy,
community ecology, and conservation of reptiles and amphibians. He has authored or
co-authored over 35 publications. His key interest is understanding species and habitat
relationships, species descriptions, and their biogeographical associations.
18 June 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1/2 | e324
Official journal website:
amphibian-reptile-conservation.org
Amphibian & Reptile Conservation
17(1 & 2) [General Section]: 19-56 (e325).
Contributions to the herpetofauna of the Angolan Okavango-
Cuando-Zambezi river drainages. Part 3: Amphibians
1.2.3.* Werner Conradie, 2?Chad Keates, *°°Luke Verburgt, *7%°°"Ninda L. Baptista,
and *'2James Harvey
'Port Elizabeth Museum, Beach Road, Humewood, Port Elizabeth 6013, SOUTH AFRICA *Department of Nature Conservation Management,
Natural Resource Science and Management Cluster, Faculty of Science, George Campus, Nelson Mandela University, George, SOUTH AFRICA
3National Geographic Okavango Wilderness Project, Wild Bird Trust, SOUTH AFRICA *South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity (SATAB),
Makhanda, SOUTH AFRICA °*Enviro-Insight CC, Unit 8 Oppidraai Office Park, Pretoria 0050, SOUTH AFRICA ‘Department of Zoology and
Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0001, SOUTH AFRICA ‘Instituto Superior de Ciéncias da Educagado da Huila (ISCED), Rua
Sarmento Rodrigues, Lubango, ANGOLA ®CIBIO/InBio, Centro de Investigacdo em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Laboratorio Associado,
Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrario de Vairdo, Rua Padre Armando Quintas, 4485-661 Vairdo, PORTUGAL °Departamento de Biologia,
Faculdade de Ciéncias, Universidade do Porto, 4169-007, Porto, PORTUGAL '°BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning,
CIBIO, Campus de Vairdo, 4485-661 Vairdo, PORTUGAL ''Museum fiir Naturkunde—Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science,
Invalidenstr. 43, 10115 Berlin, GERMANY "Harvey Ecological, 41 Devonshire Avenue, Howick, 3290, SOUTH AFRICA
Abstract.—This article is the third and final installment of the herpetofaunal results obtained from a series of
rapid biodiversity surveys of the upper Cuito, Cubango, Cuando, Zambezi, and Kwanza River basins in Angola.
The amphibian survey results are presented along with an updated checklist of the historical and current
records of amphibians from the southeastern region of Angola. A total of 1,114 new amphibian records were
documented, comprising 37 species, bringing the total number of recognized amphibian species in this region
to 49. These surveys documented two new country records (Hyperolius cf. inyangae and Kassinula wittei) and
at least two candidate new species, and elevated Amnirana adiscifera stat. nov. (which now encompasses the
western green form formerly regarded as A. darlingi). Finally, updated distribution maps for all of Angola are
provided for all the species encountered within the study region.
Keywords. Africa, Cuanavale, Cuito, Okavango, headwaters, frogs
Resumo.—Este trabalho é a terceira e ultima parte dos resultados obtidos de uma série de levantamentos
rapidos de biodiversidade realizados nas bacias dos rios Cuito, Cubango, Cuando, Zambeze e Kwanza em
Angola. Aqui apresentamos uma lista atualizada de registos anfibios do sudeste de Angola, consistindo em
registos historicos e actuais. Ao todo foram obtidos 1,114 novos registos, relativos a 37 espécies, elevando o
numero total de especies de anfibios reconhecidas nesta regiao para 49. Duas especies foram registadas no
pais pela primeira vez (Hyperolius cf. inyangae, Kassinula wittei). Os nossos resultados sugerem a existéncia
de pelo menos duas potenciais especies novas, e elevaram o estatuto de Amnirana adiscifera stat. nov. para
abranger a forma verde ocidental de A. darlingi. Por fim, produzimos mapas de distribuigao actualizados para
todas as especies encontradas neste estudo para 0 pais inteiro.
Palavras-chave. Africa, Cuanavale, Cuito, Okavango, nascentes, sapos
Citation: Conradie W, Keates C, Verburgt L, Baptista NL, Harvey J. 2023. Contributions to the herpetofauna of the Angolan Okavango-Cuando-
Zambezi River drainages. Part 3: Amphibians. Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 17(1 & 2) [General Section]: 19-56 (e325).
Copyright: © 2023 Conradie et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License [Attribution
4.0 International (CC BY 4.0): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/], which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original author and source are credited. The official and authorized publication credit sources, which will be duly enforced, are
as follows: official journal title Amphibian & Reptile Conservation; official journal website: amphibian-reptile-conservation.org.
Accepted: 13 April 2023; Published: 4 August 2023
Introduction
In recent years, knowledge on the Angolan herpetofauna
has increased dramatically (Marques et al. 2018; Baptista
et al. 2019; Branch et al. 2019a). Although reptiles have
been the main focus (Conradie et al. 2012a, 2020a, 2021,
2022a,b,c; Stanley et al. 2016; Ceriaco et al. 2020a,b,c;
Marques et al. 2019a,b, 2020, 2022a,b, 2023; Branch
et al. 2019a,b, 2021; Hallermann et al. 2020; Lobon-
Rovira et al. 2021, 2022; Parrinha et al. 2021; Wagner et
al. 2021), several amphibian-focused studies have been
published (Conradie et al. 2012b, 2013, 2020b; Ernst et
al. 2014, 2015; Conradie and Bills 2016; Ceriaco et al.
2018, 2021; Nielsen et al. 2020; Baptista et al. 2021).
Correspondence. *werner@bayworld.co.za, wernerconradie@gmail.com
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Amphibians of the Okavango Delta headwater area in Angola
From these studies, only six new species of amphibians
have been described for Angola since 2012, compared
to 35 new species of reptiles (29 lizards and six snakes).
Recent syntheses on the amphibians of Angola
documented between 111 and 117 anuran species within
the country (Marques et al. 2018; Baptista et al. 2019),
although the taxonomic status and presence within
Angola remains uncertain for several of these frogs.
Approximately 22 species are known only from the
type description, singleton records, or incorrect species
assignments which no longer apply to the Angolan
material (Marques et al. 2018; Baptista et al. 2019). A
large proportion of historical type material was lost or
destroyed during the Natural History Museum Lisbon
fire (Marques et al. 2018), complicating matters further,
thus new topotypic material is needed to validate the
taxonomical status of various species (Baptista et al.
2019).
Over the last few years, additional amphibian species
have been either recorded for the first time from Angola
(Conradie et al. 2020b; Ernst et al. 2020) or described
as new species (Ceriaco et al. 2018, 2021; Nielsen et
al. 2020; Baptista et al. 2021), raising the number of
amphibian species known from Angola by at least 13.
As more work is done in the country and remote regions
are surveyed, a trend similar to reptiles is expected, with
the predicted discovery and description of multiple new
species.
Southeastern Angola remains amongst the most poorly
known regions in Africa (Conradie et al. 2016; Marques
et al. 2018; Baptista et al. 2019). Historical amphibian
records from this region included only opportunistic
collections, most of which were restricted to the western
tributaries of the Cubango River basin (Bocage 1895;
Monard 1937), and the eastern and northern sections of
Moxico Province (Laurent 1964; Monard 1937; Mertens
1938; Ruas 1996, 2002), with only a few records from the
Cuito and Cuando river basins (Angel 1924). Recently,
based on the outcome of several biodiversity surveys
(Brooks 2012, 2013; NGOWP 2017) to document the
biodiversity of the Angolan catchment of the Okavango
River basin, which comprises the Cubango, Cuito, and
Cuando rivers, an updated herpetofauna checklist was
compiled (Conradie et al. 2016). A total of 34 species of
amphibians were recorded, four of which were new for
Angola (Ptychadena mossambica, Sclerophrys poweri,
Xenopus muelleri, and X. poweri).
The present work serves as the third and final
installment of a series of papers documenting the
herpetofauna of southeastern Angola, based on surveys
performed for the National Geographic Okavango
Wilderness Project. The first two installments focused on
snakes (Conradie et al. 2021) and on lizards, chelonians,
and crocodiles (Conradie et al. 2022c), while this article
is restricted to amphibians. The overarching aim of these
articles is to document and quantify the herpetofauna
of the region, and to contribute to the knowledge of its
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
conservation importance in both regional and national
contexts.
Materials and Methods
For this study, we present amphibian material and
associated data collected during five National Geographic
Okavango Wilderness Project (NGOWP) expeditions to
south-eastern Angola from 2016 to 2019. See Conradie et
al. (2021) for more details on these surveys, a description
of the study area, sampling techniques (trapping and
visual encounter surveys), and species mapping. Below
are some specific methods pertaining to this article.
Identification and morphology. Upon completion of
the fieldwork component of the study, species were
identified based on external morphology, using relevant
field guides or published identification keys (Poynton
and Broadley 1985a,b, 1987, 1988; Channing 2001; Du
Preez and Carruthers 2017; Channing and Rodel 2019)
and orginal type descriptions when needed, and through
direct comparisons with material housed in the Port
Elizabeth Museum (PEM). Identifications of tadpoles
were problematic, as the tadpoles of many of the species
collected as adults remain undescribed (see Channing
et al. 2012). We tentatively assigned tadpoles based on
morphotypes and locality data to the known species until
their true identities can be confirmed by genetic analysis.
In certain cases, a 16S rRNA barcoding approach was
employed to aid in the identification of tadpoles and
adults. Laboratory and sequencing protocols followed
Conradie et al. (2020b). The Basic Local Alignment
Search Tool (BLAST; Altschul et al. 1990) was used to
compare our material to the GenBank (https://www.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/genbank/; Benson et al. 2013) repository
and our unpublished Angolan dataset. Taxonomy follows
Frost (2023) and was updated as needed. Common
names follow Channing (2001), Du Preez and Carruthers
(2017), and Marques et al. (2018).
The snout-urostyle length (SUL, measured from the tip
of the snout to the posterior tip of the urostyle) of adult
Specimens and the total length of tadpoles were measured
to the nearest 0.1 mm, using a digital calliper. All specimens
were examined using a Nikon SMZ1270 binocular stereo
microscope. For adult frogs, the following information was
documented: skin texture, position and number of hand/
feet tubercles, webbing condition, and coloration. The
webbing formula follows the scheme provided by Rodel
(2000). Adult specimens were sexed by confirming the
presence/absence of eggs, a gular flap or darkened throats,
and nuptial pads. As needed, a small ventral incision was
made to look for gonads or testes. No attempt was made
to examine stomach contents (which will be the focus of
another study). Additionally, the labial tooth rows and oral
papillae condition were recorded for tadpoles. Tadpoles
are catalogued as ‘lots,’ with specimens from the same
locality and collecting event grouped together.
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Conradie et al.
ene & Ne : a? =
Fig. 1. Adult male Arthroleptis stenodactylus from
Lungwebungu River. Photo by Werner Conradie.
Results
We documented a total of 1,114 (1,011 adult frogs and
103 tadpole lots) individual amphibian records from ~189
unique localities in southeastern Angola, particularly
around the source lakes of the Cuito, Cuanavale, Cuando,
and Quembo rivers. A total of 36 species of amphibians
(comprising eight families and 20 genera, all from the
order Anura) were recorded during this study (Table 1).
Information is also reported for one additional species
(Hyperolius quinquevittatus) that was not collected
from within the core study area as previously defined.
Updated species occurrence maps are provided for
each of the 37 species, reflecting all known localities in
Angola (Maps 1-37). For the mapping exercise, a total
of 2,507 unique records were collated: 1,062 historical
records from Marques et al. (2018), 522 additional
literature records, 149 citizen science platform records,
296 records from other sources (GBIF ~ https://www.
gbif.org/, unpublished records of the PEM, SATAB, and
ZMB collections), and 925 unpublished records from our
surveys. This mapping exercise increased the number of
new or previously undocumented amphibian records in
this study by 58%.
Below we provide a checklist of the amphibians found
during these surveys, with each entry including a list of the
material examined and comments on identification, habitat,
distribution, taxonomy, and natural history notes. Material
not collected by the core team or examined for this paper
are referred to under ‘Additional material.’ New data used
to compile distribution maps can be found in Supplementary
Table 1 at: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9 figshare.23544306.v1.
Abbreviation used: asl — above sea level. Museum and col-
lectors’ codes used: INBAC — Instituto Nacional de Gestaéo
Ambiental; PEM — Port Elizabeth Museum; ZMB — Museum
fur Naturkunde Berlin (Zoological Collections); SAIAB —
South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiveristy; P — Pedro
vaz Pinto, WC — Werner Conradie.
Amphibia
Arthroleptidae
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
21
Elevation (m)
14
-16
-18
18 20 22 24
Map 1. Distribution of Arthroleptis stenodactylus in Angola.
Historical records (Marques et al. 2018) are indicated by white
dots, while new records are indicated by black dots. Axis
values are in degrees (°). Purple polygon — Okavango River
basin, Blue polygon — Cuando River basin, Brown polygon —
Zambezi River basin.
Arthroleptis stenodactylus Pfeffer, 1893
Common Squeaker (Fig. 1; Map 1)
Material (43 specimens): PEM A12495, 4 km
upstream from Cuanavale River source lake, -13.05084°
18.89726°, 1,395 m asl; PEM A12501—4, river crossing
before Samboano village, -12.30700° 18.62350°, 1,397
m asl; PEM A12526, Munhango village, -12.16310°
18.55430°, 1,421 m asl; PEM A12527, Protea stop en
route to Cuito River source, -12.30040° 18.62070°,
1,429 m asl; PEM A12528—36, INBAC: (no number
x4), Cuito River source lake, -12.68935° 18.36012°,
1,431 m asl; PEM A12585, 10 km north of Cuemba
village, -12.03481° 18.04869°, 1,372 m asl; PEM
A13815, en route to Lungwebungu River, -12.25034°
18.63742°, 1,506 m asl; PEM A12616-7, en route road
to Cuito River source, -12.55152° 18.41434° 1,507 m
asl; PEM A12618, en route road to Cuito River source,
-12.25050° 18.63730°, 1,519 m asl; PEM A12620,
drive to Cuanavale River camp from Samanunga
village, -13.03803° 18.82977°, 1,623 m asl; PEM
A12644, Cuanavale River source lake, -13.18067°
18.92172°, 1,340 m asl; PEM A12647, stop on road to
Cuito River source, -12.50584° 18.41382°, 1,556 m asl;
PEM A12648-9, camp | en route to Cuito River source,
-12.35920° 18.56280°, 1,510 m asl; PEM A12729,
Cuando River source, -13.00346° 19.12751°, 1,346 m
asl; PEM A12803-4, Lake Tchanssengwe, -12.41402°
18.64418°, 1,415 m asl; PEM A12843-—50, INBAC: (no
number x2), Quembo River source lake, -13.13624°
19.04591°, 1,411 m asl. Additional records: P2-276
(photograph and tissue sample), wetland near old
quarry east of Quemba, -12.16960° 18.22965°, 1,353
m asl. Description: Medium sized Arthroleptis, stocky
build; rounded snout; tympanum clearly visible; well-
developed inner metatarsal tubercle; no webbing; toe
tips not dilated. Dorsum uniformly beige to pink, with
scattered white speckles; no darker hourglass pattern
observed on dorsum; yellow vertebral stripe either
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Amphibians of the Okavango Delta headwater area in Angola
Table 1. Records of amphibians for the Angolan Okavango-Cuando-Zambezi river basins. ? = not recorded from the core study area,
but expected to occur based on peripheral records.
Species
ARTHROLEPTIDAE
Arthroleptis stenodactylus Pfeffer, 1893
Arthroleptis xenochirus Boulenger, 1905
Leptopelis anchietae (Bocage, 1873)
Leptopelis bocagii (Ginther, 1865)
Leptopelis sp.
BREVICIPITIDAE
Breviceps ombelanonga Nielsen,
Conradie, Ceriaco, Bauer, Heinicke,
Stanley, and Blackburn, 2020
BUFONIDAE
Mertensophryne melanopleura (Schmidt
and Inger, 1959)
Poyntonophrynus kavangensis (Poynton
and Broadley, 1988)
Schismaderma carens (Smith, 1848)
Sclerophrys funerea (Bocage, 1866)
Sclerophrys gutturalis (Power, 1927)
Sclerophrys pusilla (Mertens, 1937)
Sclerophrys poweri (Hewitt, 1935)
Sclerophrys lemairii (Boulenger, 1900)
HEMISOTIDAE
Hemisus guineensis Cope, 1865
HYPEROLITDAE
Hyperolius benguellensis (Bocage, 1893)
Hyperolius cinereus Monard, 1937
Hyperolius cf. invangae Channing, 2013
Hyperolius nasutus Gunther, 1865
FHyperolius parallelus Gunther, 1858
Hyperolius raymondi Conradie, Branch,
and Tolley, 2013
Hyperolius quinquevittatus Bocage, 1866
Hyperolius aff. bocagei Steindachner,
1867
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Okavango
River Basin
~<
x x KK XK
Cuando
River
Basin
22
x
x
Zambezi
River Basin
x x KK
Source of records
This study; Ruas 1996
This study; Ruas 1996
This study; Monard 1937; Conradie
et al. 2016
This study
This study
This study; Bocage 1895; Monard
1937; Ruas 1996
Ruas 1996
Ruas 1996
Laurent 1964
Monard 1937; Laurent 1964; Ruas
1996; Conradie et al. 2016
This study; Monard 1937; Ruas
1996; Conradie et al. 2016
This study
This study; Conradie et al. 2016
Ruas 1996; Conradie et al. 2016
This study; Monard 1937; Laurent
1964
This study; Conradie et al. 2016
This study; Conradie et al. 2016
This study
This study; Monard 1937; Conradie
et al. 2016
This study; Conradie et al. 2016
This study
This study
This study
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Conradie et al.
Table 1 (continued). Records of amphibians for the Angolan Okavango-Cuando-Zambezi river basins. ? = not recorded from the
core study area, but expected to occur based on peripheral records.
Species
Kassina kuvangensis (Monard, 1937)
Kassina senegalensis (Duméril and
Bibron, 1841)
Kassinula wittei Laurent, 1940
MICROHYLIDAE
Phrynomantis affinis Boulenger, 1901
PHRYNOBATRACHIDAE
Phrynobatrachus mababiensis
FitzSimons, 1932 complex
Phrynobatrachus natalensis (Smith, 1849)
Phrynobatrachus parvulus (Boulenger,
1905)
PIPIDAE
Xenopus muelleri (Peters, 1844)
Xenopus petersii Bocage, 1895
Xenopus poweri Hewitt, 1927
PTYCHADENIDAE
Hildebrandtia ornatissima (Bocage, 1879)
Ptychadena anchietae (Bocage, 1868)
Ptychadena bunoderma (Boulenger, 1907)
Ptychadena grandisonae Laurent, 1954
Ptychadena guibei (Laurent, 1954)
Ptychadena keilingi (Monard, 1937)
Ptychadena nilotica (Seetzen, 1855)
Ptychadena mossambica (Peters, 1854)
Ptychadena oxyrhynchus (Smith, 1849)
Ptychadena porosissima (Steindachner,
1867)
Ptychadena subpunctata (Bocage, 1866)
Ptychadena taenioscelis Laurent, 1954
Ptychadena upembae (Schmidt and Inger,
1959)
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Okavango
River Basin
Cuando
River
Basin
23
x
Zambezi
River Basin
~<
x x KM
Source of records
This study; Monard 1933, 1937;
Conradie et al. 2016
This study; Monard 1933, 1937;
Conradie et al. 2016
This study; Conradie et al. 2021
Ruas 1996
This study; Conradie et al. 2016
This study; Monard 1937; Ruas
1996; Conradie et al. 2016
Conradie et al. 2016
Conradie et al. 2016
This study; Monard 1937; Ruas
1996; Conradie et al. 2016
This study; Conradie et al. 2016
Bocage 1895; Monard 1937a; Ruas
1996
Ruas 1996
This study
This study, Ruas 1996
Ruas 1996
This study; Ruas 1996
Ruas 1996; Conradie et al. 2016
Conradie et al. 2016
This study; Monard 1937a; Conradie
et al. 2016
This study
This study; Ruas 1996; Conradie et
al. 2016
This study; Ruas 1996; Conradie et
al. 2016
This study; Ruas 1996; Conradie et
al. 2016 (as P. guebei)
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Amphibians of the Okavango Delta headwater area in Angola
Table 1 (continued). Records of amphibians for the Angolan Okavango-Cuando-Zambezi river basins. ? = not recorded from the
core study area, but expected to occur based on peripheral records.
’ Okavango
Species . ;
River Basin
Ptychadena uzungwensis (Loveridge,
1932) x
PYXICEPHALIDAE
Amietia angolensis (Bocage, 1866) x
Tomopterna tuberculosa (Boulenger,
1882) x
RANIDAE
Amnirana adiscifera (Schmidt and Inger,
1959) stat. nov. x
Amnirana lemairei (De Witte, 1921)
Species total: 51 40
absent (n = 23) or present (n = 12); faint dark facial
mask from tip of snout to the eye, continuous to the
arm; ventrum immaculate. Breeding males with dark
throats; minute spines on lower back; elongated 3”
finger, with spines on the inner side and to the tip. Adult
females (n = 11) varied from 32.6—37.7 (34.6 average)
mm SUL (largest female: PEM A12846); adult males
(n = 4) varied from 19.5—23.6 (21.5) mm (largest male:
PEM A12804). Habitat and natural history notes: All
specimens were collected in miombo woodland. Gravid
females were collected in October/November. Males
were heard calling on overcast days and evenings after
rain. In February/March, juveniles and subadults were
abundant, but no adults were collected or heard calling.
Comments: Historically, this species was only known
from three records from eastern Angola (Marques et al.
2018). Our new material shows that this species is more
Fig. 2. Adult male Arthroleptis xenochirus from Muhango
town. Photo by Werner Conradie.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Cuando ;
Zambezi
River . ; Source of records
. River Basin
Basin
This study; Ruas 1996; Conradie et
x x al. 2016
This study; Ruas 1996; Conradie et
x al. 2016
This study; Bocage 1895; Monard
xX 1937; Ruas 1996
This study; Ruas 1996; Conradie et
x x al. 2016
x Ruas 1996
31 42
common in eastern Angola than previously recognized.
This was expected as it 1s widespread to the east of the
Zambian border (Poynton and Broadley 1985a, 1991;
Channing 2001). Additionally, these are the first confirmed
records from the Okavango River basin. Studies have
shown that A. stenodactylus comprises two distinct
ecomorphs that occur in different habitats. One form, to
which our material belongs, prefers drier savanna, while
the other form is known from montane forests (Loveridge
1953; Pickersgill 2007; Bittencourt-Silva et al. 2020).
Arthroleptis xenochirus Boulenger, 1905
Plain Squeaker (Fig. 2; Map 2)
Material (8 specimens): PEM A12505-7, river crossing
before Samboano Village, -12.30700° 18.62350°, 1,398
m asl; PEM A12910-1, Muhango village, -12.16067°
18.55042°, 1,430 m asl; PEM A14696-7, Lungwebungu
Elevation (m)
3
oO
o
Map 2. Distribution of Arthroleptis xenochirus in Angola.
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Conradie et al.
River camp, -12.58439° 18.66748°, 1,297 m asl; PEM
A14777, Quembo River bridge camp, -13.52746°
19.2806°, 1,241 m asl. Additional material: P2-272
(photograph and tissue sample), wetland near old quarry
east of Quemba, -12.16960° 18.22965°, 1,353 m asl.
Description: A small species of Arthroleptis, slender
body; pointed snout; small tympanum, not always clearly
visible; well-developed inner metatarsal tubercle; no
webbing; slightly dilated toe tips. Dorsal color varies
from beige to brown, with some red infusion; dark facial
mask from snout to eye, continuing to just above arm:
white markings on grey colored jawline; all specimens
have a darkened hour-glass pattern on the back; ventrum
immaculate. Breeding males with dark throats; elongated
3 finger, with no spines. Single adult female measured
20.9 mm (PEM A14777); adult males (n = 4) varied
from 19.5—23.6 (21.5) mm (largest male: PEM A14697).
Habitat and natural history notes: All specimens
were collected in miombo woodland. Males were heard
calling in October/November. Gravid female collected
in November, while only juveniles and subadults were
collected in February/March. Comments: Known from
central and northern Angola (Marques et al. 2018).
The record from lower Quembo River represents the
southernmost record for the species, and the first record
associated with the Okavango River basin.
Leptopelis anchietae (Bocage, 1873)
Anchieta’s Tree Frog (Map 3)
Material (1 tadpole lot): PEM A14174 (five tadpoles),
Cubango River campsite below rapids, west of Fundo
village, -13.04260° 16.37476°, 1,559 m asl. Description:
Elongated tadpoles; 20.8—30.6 mm total length, with
tail 2.6-3.1 times the body length. Body is dark brown
to black, ventrum with scattered light golden spots;
lateral tail muscle dark brown to black, with two lighter
bands from body to tail tip; posterior half of tail black.
The labial tooth row formula (LTRF) 1s 3(2-3)/3(1);
jaw sheaths are heavily keratinized; anterior part of
mouth free of elongated marginal papillae. Habitat
and natural history notes: Tadpoles were collected in
a flooded grassland next to the main river. Comments:
f
Elevation (m)
Map 3. Distribution of Leptopelis anchietae in Angola.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Identification of tadpoles was confirmed by 16S rRNA
barcoding (N. Baptista, unpub. data) and compared to
the description in Channing et al. (2012). This Angolan
endemic species occurs mostly in the highlands of central
and western Angola (Becker et al., in prep.), and many of
the old historical records (e.g., Marques et al. 2018) are
based on incorrect identifications or erroneous locality
data (Pedro vaz Pinto, pers. comm. ).
Leptopelis bocagii (Gunther, 1865)
Bocage’s Tree Frog (Figs. 3—4; Map 4)
Material (46 specimens): PEM A12701-10,
Lungwebungu River camp bridge crossing, -12.58347°
18.66598°, 1,304 m asl; PEM A12742-6, Cuando
Fig. 3. Adult male Leptopelis bocagii (brown form) from
Cuando River source. Photo by James Harvey.
ee ay “ £ ca ie
) at a, ff A... oc.) a as — oe.
FS) a oe: es : = _ * Med a .
Fig. 4. Adult male Leptopelis bocagii (green form) from
Cuanavale River side tributary source. Photo by Luke Verburet.
Elevation (m)
3
fo)
oO
12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Map 4. Distribution of Leptopelis bocagii in Angola.
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Amphibians of the Okavango Delta headwater area in Angola
River source, -13.00346° 19.12751°, 1,346 m asl; PEM
A12772-4, INBAC: WC-4634, Cuanavale River side
tributary source, -13.07452° 18.88345°, 1,385 m asl:
PEM A12873-80, INBAC: WC-4669 and 4672, Quembo
River source lake, -13.13624° 19.04591°, 1,411 m asl;
PEM A14688-9, Lungwebungu River camp, massambas
on left side of river, -12.58276° 18.66556°, 1,295 m asl;
PEMA14701—4, INBAC: WC-6763, Lungwebungu River
camp, -12.58439° 18.66748°, 1,297 m asl; PEM A14723,
PEM A14742, Quembo River bridge camp, -13.52746°
19.28060°, 1,241 m asl; PEM A14741, Quembo River
bridge camp, trap 3, -13.52778° 19.27455°, 1,256 m asl;
PEM A14755-6, PEM A14758-9, INBAC: WC-6994,
Quembo River right side tributary (Micongo River)
past village, -13.51877° 19.28487°, 1,248 m asl; PEM
A14823, camp at side tributary (Luandai River) of the
Luanguinga River, -13.70885° 21.26234°, 1,116 m asl;
PEM A14891, Luvu River camp, -13.71200° 21.83538°,
1,082 m asl. Description: Large terrestrial tree frog;
broad rounded head; large protruding eyes; tympanum
clearly visible; large well-developed inner metatarsal
tubercle; no webbing or expanded toe tips. Dorsum
varied from green to brown, with dark horseshoe pattern
on the back, and dark interorbital bar; dark facial mask
from snout to eye, continuing to above arm; sides of
body with scattered black spots or continuous black bar
between limbs; scattered white speckles on dorsum;
ventrum immaculate. Breeding males with dark throat
and weakly developed pectoral glands. Adult females
(n = 12) varied from 41.5-67.8 (57.9) mm (largest
female: PEM A12746); adult males (n = 34) varied from
43.0—56.8 (48.6) mm (largest male: INBAC: WC-4669).
Habitat and natural history notes: Collected along
the sandy margins of source lakes or rivers associated
with miombo woodland. Frequently encountered in the
clearings of agricultural fields near water sources. Males
were found calling from the ground. Comment. These
are the first records from eastern Angola, bridging the
distribution gap between western Angola and Zambia
(Broadley 1971; Marques et al. 2018; Baptista et al.
2019).
Leptopelis sp.
Unidentified Tree Frog (Figs. 5-6; Map 5)
Material (34 specimens, 2 tadpole lots): PEM
A12801-—2, Cuanavale River source lake, -13.08934°
18.89485°, 1,359 m asl; PEM A12882-8, Quembo
River source lake, -13.13624° 19.04591°, 1,396 m asl;
PEM A12794—5, INBAC: WC-4685 and no number,
Cuanavale River source lake, -13.09442° 18.89372°,
1,368 m asl; PEM A12747-51, INBAC: WC-4754 and
no number, Cuando River source, -13.00346° 19.12751°,
1,353 m asl; PEM A14118 (tadpoles), Calua River
source, 6 km SE of Cuito River source, -12.73675°
18.39310°, 1,446 m asl; PEM A13845-6, PEM A14123
(tadpoles), Cuiva River source, -12.66825° 18.35282°,
1,407 m asl; PEM A12786, Cuando River source, trap
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
26
nN
Fig. 5. Adult male Leptopelis sp. from Cuanavale River source.
Photo by Luke Verburet.
Fig. 6. Tadpole of Leptopelis sp. from Cuiva River source.
Photo by Werner Conradie.
Elevation (m)
Map 5. Distribution of Leptopelis sp. in Angola.
4, -13.00164° 19.12960°, 1,361 m asl; PEM A12819-
21, Cuiva River source, -12.66856° 18.35307°, 1,433
m asl; PEM A14775, INBAC: WC-6852, Quembo
River bridge camp, -13.52746° 19.28060°, 1,241 m asl;
PEM A14767-—74, Quembo River right side tributary
(Micongo River) past village, -13.51877° 19.28487°,
1,248 m asl. Additional material (3 specimens): P2-
277, wetland near old quarry east of Quemba, -12.16960°
18.22965°, 1,353 m asl; SAIAB 209098 (2 specimens),
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Conradie et al.
Quembo River source lake, -13.14025° 19.04822°,
1,365 m asl. Description: Small terrestrial tree frog;
large protruding eyes; tympanum clearly visible; well-
developed rounded inner metatarsal tubercle; reduced
webbing; digit tips slightly dilated (slightly wider than
finger), finger tips more dilated than toe tips. Dorsum
tan-brown; dark brown interorbital bar often present:
dark brown vertebral stripe from just behind head to
vent; some individuals with extra paravertebral bands;
dark brown facial mask extending past arm onto side
of body; scattered white speckles; groin with scattered
unpigmented skin, extending onto the limbs; throat
darkly pigmented; ventrum immaculate. Males with
weakly developed pectoral glands and darkened throats.
Adult females (n = 2) varied from 36.6—-40.7 (38.7) mm
(largest female: PEM A12786); adult males (n = 35)
varied from 29.0—34.6 (31.1) mm (largest male: PEM
A12883). Elongated brown tadpoles; 40.7—52.2 mm total
length, with tail 3.2 times body length; strong tail muscle
starting just behind eye; thin fin margin above and below;
LTRF 2(1)/3(1); jaw sheaths heavily keratinized, anterior
part free of elongated marginal papillae. Habitat and
natural history notes: Males were found calling in trees
and shrubs (0.5—3 m above the ground), which were often
located far from water, in grasslands with sparse tree
cover. As the rainy season progressed, calls were heard
progressively closer to water bodies, until eventually
being heard among vegetation in the wetlands. The call
resembles a chuckle. The eel-like tadpoles were found in
wetlands among dense aquatic vegetation. Comments:
Unusual light pink/red eel-like tadpoles were initially
found in wetlands at the source of two different river
systems, the Cuito and Kwanza rivers, in February
2016. A small number of these tadpoles were raised to
adults in captivity. Nearly seven months were required to
reach metamorphosis, during which time they changed
from light pink/red to a more brownish coloration. They
seemed to be sensitive to light as they swam eratically
when removed from a dark environment and exposed
to bright light. During the start of the rainy season in
October 2016, unusual calls were heard which could not
Fig. 7. Adult male Breviceps ombelanonga from Cuanavale
River source. Photo by Luke Verburgt.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
27
be assigned to a known species. After triangulation, several
individuals were found calling from trees or shrubs, which
were often far from water. On closer inspection, these
specimens were found to be morphologically identical to
the ones raised in captivity. We subsequently found these
frogs at all major river sources and along rivers. Barcode
analysis (16S rRNA) recovered the unknown Leptopelis as
similar to L. ocellatus (94% similarity; KY080253), but the
latter is a forest species with well-developed discs on toes.
Schmidt and Inger (1959) described Leptopelis parvus
from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), which
resembles our Leptopelis sp. because of its small size and
the shared absence of a white stripe above the vent that
stretches onto the legs. However, our specimens differ
from L. parvus in dorsal coloration pattern (para- and
vertebral stripe present versus absent in L. parvus), lack of
discs (dilated toe tips, but no clear discs versus clear discs
in L. parvus), and pectoral glands (present versus absent in
L. parvus). Further phylogenetic and morphological work
is needed to resolve the taxonomic status of this species.
Brevicipitidae
Breviceps ombelanonga Nielsen, Conradie, Ceriaco,
Bauer, Heinicke, Stanley, and Blackburn, 2020
Angolan Rain Frog (Fig. 7; Map 6)
Material (4 specimens): PEM A12787, Quembo
River source lake, -13.13544° 19.04397°, 1,374 m
asl; PEM A12800, Cuanavale River source lake,
-13.08934° 18.89485°, 1,359 m asl; PEM A12770,
Cuando River source, -13.00334° 19.13564°, 1,362 m
asl; PEM A12537, Cuito River source lake, -12.68935°
18.36012°, 1,431 m asl. Additional material (1
specimen): SAIAB 204537, Quembo River source
lake, -13.13583° 19.04528°, 1,370 m asl. Description:
Medium sized Breviceps; stout body; snout extremely
shortened; pupils horizontally elliptical; tympanum not
visible; outer metacarpal tubercle flat and undivided:
short limbs; webbing absent; well-developed inner
metatarsal tubercle fused with the outer metatarsal
tubercle, with no deep cleft present, elongated, and
Elevation (m)
Map 6. Distribution of Breviceps ombelanonga in Angola.
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Amphibians of the Okavango Delta headwater area in Angola
protruding outwards. Coloration varied from red with
scattered black blotches, dark brown with red spots and
markings, and light brown with red spots and black
blotches (Nielsen et al. 2020). The only female collected
measured 30.1 mm (PEM A12770); adult males (n = 3)
varied from 18.3—26.6 (26.2) mm (largest male: PEM
A12787). Habitat and natural history notes: Males
were only heard calling during the day, especially
after heavy rains; calling did not continue into the
evenings. Call sites were among leaf litter in dense
miombo woodland. Comments: The taxonomic status
of Angolan Breviceps was recently addressed, leading
to the description of this material as a new species, B.
ombelanonga (Nielsen et al. 2020). Broader sampling
across Angola may detect the presence of other species
(e.g., B. adspersus to the south and B. poweri to the
east) and even additional undescribed species. For now,
all historical records are mapped as B. ombelanonga,
until their taxonomic status can be confirmed.
Bufonidae
Sclerophrys gutturalis (Power, 1827)
Guttural Toad (Fig. 8; Map 7)
Material (69 specimens): PEM A12484, INBAC:
WC-4841—2. Cuanavale River source lake, -13.08537°
18.89098°, 1,360 m asl; PEM A12498, drive back from
Cuchi to Menongue, -14.67986° 17.17512°, 1,404 m asl;
PEM A12573-—5, Cuito River source lake, -12.68935°
18.36012°, 1,431 masl; PEMA12612, Calua River source,
6 km SE of Cuito River source, -12.73675° 18.39310°,
1,442 m asl; PEM A12625-6, HALO Cuito , -12.39584°
16.96067°, 1,697 m asl; PEM A12629, roadside ditch
10 km SW of Cuito town, -12.44815° 16.88118°, 1,742
m asl; PEM A12639, PEM A12643, Cuanavale River,
-13.37406° 18.99269°, 1,304 m asl; PEM A12677-9,
INBAC: WC-5232, Camp 3, Malova Village, Mipanha
River, -14.09140° 16.41476°, 1,553 masl; PEM A12685,
Huambo HALO training camp, -12.73726° 15.81828°,
1,665 m asl; PEM A12698, Cuando River bridge,
-13.60757° 19.53257°, 1,277 m asl; PEM A12719—25,
Fig. 8. Adult male Sclerophrys gutturalis from Lungwebungu
River source. Photo by Werner Conradie.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Lungwebungu River camp bridge crossing, -12.58346°
18.66598°, 1,304 m asl; PEM A12796-7, Cuanavale
River source lake camp side, -13.09442° 18.89372°,
1,368 m asl; PEM A12907-8, INBAC: no number (x2),
Quembo River source lake, -13.13624° 19.04591°,
1,366 m asl; PEM A13763, Lungwebungu River, trap
2, -12.58199° 18.66562°, 1,208 m asl; PEM A13781,
Lungwebungu River, trap 3, -12.58056° 18.66419°,
1,302 m asl; PEM A13784, Cuquema River, downstream,
-12.47021° 16.82334°, 1,644 m asl, PEM A13790, Dam/
Hydroplant on Cuquema River, -12.42556° 16.81856°,
1,640 m asl; PEM A14680, Menongue, -14.63015°
17.63465°, 1,373 m asl; PEM A14685, wetland near old
quarry east of Quemba, -12.16960° 18.22965°, 1,353 m
asl; PEM A14712—5, INBAC: WC-6975, Lungwebungu
River camp, -12.58439° 18.66748°, 1,297 m asl; PEM
A14724, Quembo River bridge, -13.52746° 19.28060°,
1,241 m asl; PEM A14739, Quembo River bridge camp,
trap 1, -13.52801° 19.28147°, 1,236 masl; PEM A14740,
Quembo River bridge camp, -13.52746° 19.28060°,
1,241 m asl; PEM A14744, Quembo River bridge camp,
trap 4, -13.52658° 19.27810°, 1,248 masl; PEMA14818—
22, INBAC: WC-7004, Luio River camp floodplains,
-13.19711° 20.22194°, 1,181 m asl; PEM A14824-6,
INBAC: WC-7029, Camp at side tributary (Luandai
River) of the Luanguinga River, -13.70885° 21.26234°,
1,116 m asl; PEM A14831, Luanguinga River waterfall,
-13.71132° 21.24914°, 1,118 m asl; PEM A14851-5,
INBAC: WC-7044, Lake Hundo, -14.97431° 21.62966°,
1,100 m asl; PEM A14889-90, INBAC: WC-7079,
Luvu River camp, -13.71200° 21.83538°, 1,082 m asl.
Description: Large robust toad; snout rounded; elevated
parotoid glands. Dorsum dark brown with pairs of dark
paravertebral patches; pairs of dark patches on snout and
behind eyes that create the appearance of a pale cross
on head; in PEM A12724 and A12720 a continuous dark
interorbital bar is present; back of thighs often with red
infusions (not always present in females or juveniles).
In breeding males, the dorsum becomes yellow, with
numerous small black-tipped asperites; throat darkened;
enlarged arms; black nuptial pads present on palm and
Elevation (m)
3S
o
Oo
Map 7. Distribution of Sclerophrys gutturalis in Angola.
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Conradie et al.
first finger. Adult females (n = 22) varied from 54.4—
109.7 (78.3) mm (largest female: PEM A12575); adult
males (n = 37) varied from 56.7—89.2 (74.6) mm (largest
male: PEM A14890). Habitat and natural history
notes: Found in miombo woodland. Males were heard
calling from margins of the source lakes. Comments:
Widespread species across most of south-central Africa
(Channing and Rédel 2019). Most historical Angolan
material has been referred to as Bufo regularis Reus,
1833. Since the description of Bufo regularis gutturalis
Power, 1927 (subsequently elevated to full species), the
Angolan material has only partly been reassigned (Ruas
1996), and the rest of the extant material needs to be re-
assessed to verify the taxonomic status. Additionally,
this species needs to be reassessed as other authors have
demonstrated that cryptic species may be present in this
taxon (Pickersgill 2007; Telford et al. 2019).
Sclerophrys pusilla (Mertens, 1937)
Flat-backed Toad (Fig. 9; Map 8)
Material (41 specimens): PEM A12425—6, INBAC (no
number), Cunde waterfall, -13.77364° 18.75514°, 1,287
masl; PEMA12434, south of Menongue en route to Cuebe
River, -14.96288° 17.69090°, 1,319 masl; PEM A12446,
Cuchi River gorge, -14.59000° 16.90758°, 1,375 m asl;
PEM A12494, HALO Menongue, -14.66317° 17.66521°,
1,386 m asl; PEM A12499, INBAC (no number), drive
back from Cuchi to Menongue, -14.67986° 17.17512°,
1,404 m asl; PEM A12623-4, HALO Cuito , -12.39584°
16.96067°, 1,697 m asl; PEM A12630-1, roadside ditch
10 km SW of Cuito, -12.44815° 16.88118°, 1,742 m asl;
PEM A12636, Quembo River source camp, -13.52653°
19.28368°, 1,242 m asl; PEM A12640, Cuanavale River,
-13.37406° 18.99269°, 1,297 m asl; PEM A12642,
Cuanavale River, -13.29236° 18.96283°, 1,313 m asl;
PEM A 12650—1, Kwanza River bridge, -11.99348°
17.66965°, 1,273 m asl; PEM A12652, Kuvango Hydro
Plant Site, wetland to east, -14.38755° 16.30166°, 1,451
m asl; PEM A12658, old Kuvango Hydroplant site,
-14.38775° 16.29365°, 1,440 m asl; PEM A12659-60,
Campsite 2 near Cuvango Mission, -13.32887 16.41167,
1,537 m asl; PEM A12668, Campsite 1 below rapids,
Fig. 9. Adult male Sclerophrys pusilla from Cuito town. Photo
by Werner Conradie.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
west of Fundo village, -13.04483° 16.37520°, 1,565 m
asl; PEM A12680, Camp 3, Malova Village, Mipanha
River, -14.09140° 16.41476°, 1,553 masl; PEM A12686-
7, Huambo HALO training camp, -12.73726° 15.81828°,
1,665 m asl; PEM A12690, Cubango 2017 launch site,
-12.61700° 16.22132°, 1,727 m asl; PEM A12839, 31
km W of Menongue, Cueli River, -14.70511° 17.38014°,
1,392 masl; PEM A13791, Dam/Hydroplant on Cuquema
River, -12.42556° 16.81856°, 1,640 m asl; PEM A14681—
2, Menongue, -14.63015° 17.63465°, 1,373 m asl; PEM
A14720-1, 14725, Quembo River bridge, -13.52746°
19.28060°, 1,241 m asl; PEM A14745—7, Quembo River
bridge camp, -13.52746° 19.28060°, 1,241 m asl; PEM
A17761—2, Quembo River right side tributary (Micongo
River) past village, -13.51877° 19.28487°, 1,478 m
asl. Description: Medium sized toad; sharp snout
profile; small flattened parotoid glands. Light brown
dorsal coloration, with irregular darker markings; no
interorbital bar; thin light dorsal stripe may be present;
no red markings on the back of the thighs. Males with
darkened throats; dorsum with black tipped asperites.
Adult females (n = 16) varied from 52.1—79.3 (65.9)
mm (largest female: PEM A14745); adult males (n = 9)
varied from 35.5—58.7 (50.3) mm (largest male: PEM
A12839). Habitat and natural history notes: Found
in miombo woodland, sympatric with S. gutturalis.
Comments: Poynton et al. (2016) recently split West
Africa S. maculata from central and southern African
S. pusilla. All the historical Angolan material referred
to under the former name, S. maculata, now represents
S. pusilla.
Sclerophrys poweri (Hewitt, 1935)
Western Olive Toad (Fig. 10; Map 9)
Material (8 specimens): PEM A14876-82, INBAC:
WC-7076, wetland south of Lake Hundo, -15.01099°
21.63608°, 1,100 m asl. Description: Large robust toad;
snout rounded; large elevated parotoid glands. Dorsum
of females tan with distinct black-edged dark brown to
deep red paired dorsal markings; in males it can be more
olive-yellow; red infusions on the back of the thighs.
Males with dark throat and dorsal surface spinose with
-12
Elevation (m)
“14
-16
Map 8. Distribution of Sclerophrys pusilla in Angola.
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Amphibians of the Okavango Delta headwater area in Angola
Fig. 10. Adult female Sclerophrys poweri from Lake Hundo.
Photo by Werner Conradie.
small black tipped asperites. Adult females (n = 3) varied
from 101.0-102.3 (101.8) mm (largest female: PEM
A14876; maximum recorded size); adult males (n = 5)
varied from 85.5—97.0 (93.3) mm (largest male: PEM
A14877; maximum recorded size). Habitat and natural
history notes: This species was heard calling during
early evenings in a flooded wetland and from margins
of large natural lakes. Comments: Only a few records
exist for southern and eastern Angola (Marques et al.
2018; Baptista et al. 2019). These specimens represent
the easternmost records in Angola, and only the second
record for Moxico Province (Ruas 1996).
Hemisotidae
Hemisus guineensis Cope, 1865
Guinea Shovel-snouted Frog (Fig. 11; Map 10)
Material (6 specimens): PEM A14955, Cuando
River, CUD2018 AC Camp 27, -16.09006° 21.83947°,
1,038 m asl; PEM A14832-3, INBAC: WC-6948,
Lake Hundo, -14.97431° 21.62966°, 1,100 m asl:
PEM A13831, Cuando River, camp 18, -14.66105°
20.16858°, 1,124 m asl; PEM A12771, Cuando River
Source, trap 3, -13.00334° 19.13564°, 1,360 m asl.
Additional material (1 tadpole lot): SAIAB 209095 (7
Fig. 11. Adult female Hemisus guineensis from Cuando River
source. Photo by Werner Conradie.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Elevation (m)
3
oO
oO
Map 9. Distribution of Sclerophrys poweri in Angola.
tadpoles), small wooden bridge across wetland on road
between Cuanavale River source camp and Munhango,
-12.30714° 18.62333°, 1,397 m asl. Description: Small
to medium sized frog; hardened pointed snout; small
eyes; tympanum hidden; smooth dorsum (except PEM
A12771, in which the yellow spots are slightly elevated):
transverse skin ridge between posterior corners of eye,
extending behind eye to above the arm; reduced webbing;
large inner metatarsal and outer metacarpal tubercles.
Grey dorsum with yellow mottling or spots; yellow
vertebral stripe present; ventrum granular, with small
irregular spots. Males with dark throats. Adult females
(n= 3) varied from 40.5—49.2 (43.4) mm (largest female:
PEM A12771); adult males (n= 3) varied from 26.7—31.6
(29.8) mm (largest male: PEM A14955). Habitat and
natural history notes: No calls were heard. Specimens
were either caught in traps or by hand while they were
active at night after heavy rains in November, near
open grassland and pans. One female (PEM A13831)
collected in November was gravid. Comments: Laurent
(1972) assigned all Angolan material he examined to
the subspecies H. guineensis microps, and this was
followed by Ruas (1996). However, Channing (2001)
and Marques et al. (2018) documented two species of
Hemisus occuring in Angola, Hemisus guineensis in the
Elevation (m)
3
oO
Oo
Map 10. Distribution of Hemisus guineensis in Angola.
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Conradie et al.
Fig. 12. Adult female Hyperolius benguellensis from Cubango
River rapids near Fundo village. Photo by Werner Conradie.
north and H. marmoratus in the south-central region. We
follow Laurent (1972) and assign all Angolan material
to Hemisus guineensis until an in-depth phylogenetic
work is conducted to assess the taxonomic status of the
available material.
Hyperoliidae
Hyperolius benguellensis (Bocage, 1893)
Benguela Reed Frog (Fig. 12; Map 11)
Material (8 specimens, | tadpole lot): PEM A12438-41,
INBAC (no number x2), Cuchi River gorge, -14.59000°
16.90758°, 1,365 m asl; PEM A12661, PEM A14172,
Campsite 2 near old Cuvango Mission, -13.33451°
16.41280°, 1,356 masl; PEM A12675—6, Camp 3, Malova
Village, Mipanha River, -14.09140° 16.41476°, 1,553 m
asl; PEM A12666, Cubango River campsite 1 below rapids,
west of Fundo village, -13.04790° 16.37896°, 1,568 m asl.
Additional specimens (1 tadpole lot): SAIAB 209058
(18 tadpoles), Cuvango power station, entrance to canal,
-14.38650° 16.28767°, 1,457 m asl. Description: Small
reed frog; sharp but truncated snout, with small to no
anterior protrusion; pedal webbing formula: I(1), I i/e (1-
0.5), TT (1-0.5), TV (1-1), V (0.75). Dorsum green with
white dorso-lateral stripes (mostly males) or uniformly
green with scattered brown spots (mostly females);
ventrum transparent. Males with yellow gular disc. Single
adult female measured 24.7 mm (PEM A12438); adult
males (n = 7) varied from 16.2—22.8 (19.7) mm (largest
male: PEM A12440). Habitat and natural history notes:
Found on margins of rivers and in wetlands. Restricted
to the western side of the study area, associated with the
Cubango River system. Comments: In the most recent
revision of the Hyperolius nasutus-complex, 16 species
have been recognized (Channing et al. 2013). At least
four species are expected to occur in Angola (Channing
et al. 2013; Marques et al. 2018; Baptista et al. 2019),
namely H. benguellensis, H. nasutus, H. adspersus, and
H. dartevellei. Two clear morphotypes exist based on
the general snout shape: sharp (benguellensis group) and
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
31
Elevation (m)
12
14 16 18 20
Map 11. Distribution of Hyperolius benguellensis in Angola.
rounded (nasutus group). Of the sharp snouted form, we
distinguished between two morphotypes in southeastern
Angola: the ‘shark’-like profile (H. benguellensis, this
Species account) and the acutely pointed snout, with
a distinct protruding tip (H. cf. inyangae, see species
account below). These identifications were confirmed by
comparing 16S rRNA barcodes (W. Conradie, unpub.
data) to published sequences (Channing et al. 2012). The
remaining material is assigned to the nasutus group (see
species account below). However, it must be noted that
these little green frogs have been the subject of rigorous
taxonomic debate over the years due to their cryptic
nature, molecular and morphological similarity, and
substantial geographic overlaps (see Channing et al. 2012
for overview). The taxonomic status of Angolan species
belonging to these groups needs to be assessed in a broad-
scale phylogenetic study.
Hyperolius cinereus Monard, 1937
Ashy Reed Frog (Fig. 13; Map 12)
Material (12 specimens, 1 tadpole lot): PEM A12442—
4, INBAC (no numbers x 2), Cuchi River gorge,
-14.59000° 16.90758°, 1,375 m asl; PEM A12664,
PEM A12670, Cubango River, campsite 1 below
rapids, west of Fundo village, -13.04790° 16.37806°,
1,565 m asl; PEM A13787-9, INBAC: WC-520, Dam/
Hydroplant on Cuquema River, -12.42556° 16.81856°,
1,640 m asl; PEM A14128 (10 tadpoles), old Kuvango
Hydroplant Site, wetland to east, -14.38755° 16.30166°,
1,438 m asl; INBAC: WC-5169, Cubango River source
site, -12.66256° 16.09324°, 1,771 m asl. Description:
Medium sized reed frog. No sexual dichromatism
observed; both sexes with lime green to olive dorsum;
protruding yellow eyes; red inner thighs; ventrum
yellow. Males with yellow gular disc. Adult females (n
= 3) varied from 20.3—29.1 (25.0) mm (largest female
PEM A13789); adult males (n = 9) varied from 19.1—
22.8 (21.6) mm (largest male: PEM A12443). Habitat
and natural history notes: Only recorded from the
western side of the study area, where it was associated
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Amphibians of the Okavango Delta headwater area in Angola
Fig. 13. Adult Hyperolius cinereus from Cubango River rapids
near Fundo village. Photo by Werner Conradie.
with the Cubango and Cuito rivers. Comments: Widely
recorded from the interior highlands of Angola (Conradie
et al. 2013). The map in Marques et al. (2018) incorrectly
plotted records from southern Cuando Cubango Province.
The southeasternmost Angolan record of this species 1s
close to the town of Menongue (Conradie et al. 2013).
Hyperolius cf. inyvangae Laurent, 1943
Nyanga Reed Frog (Fig. 14; Map 13)
Material (30 specimens): PEM A12730-3, INBAC:
WC-4839; INBAC (no number x3), Cuando River source,
-13.00346° 19.12751°, 1,353 m asl; PEM A14793-—
803, INBAC: WC-7023, INBAC: WC-7025, Luio
River camp floodplains, -13.19711° 20.22194°, 1,181
m asl; PEM A13741, Lungwebungu River campsite,
-12.58319° 18.66570°, 1,284 m asl; PEM A14887-8,
Luvu River camp, -13.71200° 21.83538°, 1,082 m asl:
PEM A12858—9, Quembo River source lake, -13.13624°
19.04591°, 1,366 m asl; PEM A12500, PEM A12513,
river crossing before Samboano Village, -12.30700°
18.62350°, 1,398 m asl; PEM A14892-3, wetland near
old quarry east of Quemba, -12.16960° 18.22965°,
1,353 m asl. Additional material (1 specimen): P2-
Fig. 14. Adult male Hyperolius cf. invangae from Cuando River
source. Photo by Werner Conradie.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
— 2000
- 1500
— 1000
Elevation (m)
Map 12. Distribution of Hyperolius cinereus in Angola.
274 (photograph and tissue sample), wetland near old
quarry east of Quemba, -12.16960° 18.22965°, 1,353
m asl. Description: Small slender species of reed frog;
very sharp snout with a small anterior protrusion, which
extends well beyond the margin of the mouth; small
black asperites on throat; pedal webbing formula: I(1),
II w/e (1-0.75), IM (1-0.75), TV (0.75-0.75), V (0.5).
Dorsum lime green with white dorsolateral stripes;
ventrum transparent; toe tips and webbing yellow. Adult
females (n= 9) varied from 15.0—19.6 (16.7) mm (largest
female: PEM A12500); adult males (n = 21) varied from
12.8-17.9 (15.1) mm (largest male: PEM A14893).
Habitat and natural history notes: Found sympatric
with Hyperolius nasutus at the Lungwebungu, Cuando,
and Quembo rivers, where they were distinguished by
microhabitat preference. Hyperolius cf. invangae was
found among vegetation associated with slow running
water, while H. nasutus was found on margins of
source lakes or flooded areas with larger bodies of open
water. Comments: Bittencourt-Silva (2019) assigned a
specimen from western Zambia to H. nasicus based on
head shape and webbing, but mentioned that molecularly
itis most like H. invangae. The new material documented
Elevation (m)
Map 13. Distribution of Hyperolius cf. invangae in Angola.
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Conradie et al.
here is molecularly identical (16S rRNA: 97.5—100%)
to the published sequences of H. inyangae (Channing
et al. 2013; Bittencourt-Silva 2019) and agrees with
the description, especially regarding the sharp snout
usually with a pointed protrusion, but differs in the pedal
webbing condition (Channing et al. 2013). It is reported
to have reduced webbing and is illustrated as such, while
the specimens here have more extensive webbing. This
is either an error or there is a degree of variation in the
webbing condition. The presence of this species so far to
the west is an unexpected result, as H. invangae is currently
only known from the Eastern Highlands of Zimbabwe.
These new records thus represent a range extension of
over 1,500 km westward. Further phylogenetic work is
underway to fully document the taxonomic status of this
population and other species assigned to the H. nasutus
or H. benguellensis complexes.
Hyperolius nasutus Gunther, 1865
Large-nosed Reed Frog (Fig. 15; Map 14)
Material (64 specimens, 1 tadpole lot): PEM
A12599-601, Calua River source, 6 km SE of Cuito
River source, -12.73675° 18.39310°, 1,445 m asl:
PEM A12424, Cunde waterfall, -13.77390° 18.75520°,
1,285 m asl; PEM A14107 (tadpoles), PEM A12435,
confluence of Cuito and Calua rivers, -13.12458°
18.20909°, 1,345 m asl; PEM A12461-3, INBAC (no
number x 4), Cuanavale River source lake, -13.08537°
18.89098°, 1,360 m asl; PEM A12738—40, INBAC (no
number), Cuando River source, -13.00346° 19.12751°,
1,353 m asl; PEM A12693, Cubango River source site,
-12.66256° 16.09324°, 1,771 m asl; PEM A12445,
Cuchi River gorge, -14.5900° 16.90758°, 1,365 m asl;
PEM A12550-1, Cuito River source lake, -12.68935°
18.36012°, 1,431 m asl; PEM A12427, INBAC (no
number), Cuiva River bridge on EN250, -11.98345°
17.72367°, 1,267 m asl; PEM A12490, Dala River,
near Samanunga village, -12.93169° 18.81458°, 1,363
m asl; PEM A12665, Cubango River campsite 1 below
Fig. 15. Adult male Hyperolius nasutus from Cuanavale River
source. Photo by Werner Conradie.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
rapids, west of Fundo village, -13.04790° 16.37896°,
1,568 m asl; PEM A12805-6, PEM A13804—12, Lake
Tchanssengwe, -12.41402° 18.64418°, 1,393 m_ asl;
PEM A14827-8, INBAC (no number), Luanguinga
River waterfall, -13.71132° 21.24914°, 1,118 m asl;
PEM A13773-80, Lungwebungu River old oxbows,
-12.58129° 18.67162°, 1,304 m asl; PEM A14750—52,
Quembo River right side tributary (Micongo River)
past village, -13.51877° 19.28487°, 1,248 m asl; PEM
A12860-62, INBAC (no number), Quembo River
source lake, -13.13624° 19.04591°, 1,366 m asl; PEM
A14729-35, INBAC (no number x2), Quembo River,
oxbow near small waterfall, -13.54257° 19.29551°,
1,233 m asl. Additional material (13 specimens, 8
tadpole lots): SATAB 209057 (1 specimen), Cuanavale
River near confluence, -13.12478° 18.90017°, 1,346
m asl; SAIAB 204573 (2 specimens), Quembo River
source lake, -13.13586° 19.04492°, 1,369 m asl; SAIAB
209053 (7 tadpoles), outlet River from Kuembo River
source lake, -13.13689° 19.03144°, 1,392 m asl; SAIAB
209173 (3 tadpoles), Quembo River source, -13.13583°
19.04528°, 1,370 m asl; SAIAB 209051 (5 specimens),
Quembo River source lake, -13.14025° 19.04822°, 1,365
m asl; SAIAB 209045 (6 tadpoles), stream outflow
about 2.6 km downstream of source lake, -13.00317°
19.15153°, 1,331 m asl; SAIAB 209056 (3 specimens),
SAIAB 209087 (1 specimen), small stream 3 km below
Cuanavale River source camp, -13.12539° 18.89914°,
1,344 m asl; SAIAB 209049 (5 tadpoles), south west
of Cambuta on main track, -13.44678° 19.96403°,
1,229 m asl; SAIAB 209055 (1 tadpole), river bridge at
Cangamba, -13.69611° 19.87503°, 1,193 m asl; SAIAB
209050 (1 tadpole), Calua lagoon, -12.73600° 18.39394°,
1,448 m asl; SAIAB 209026 (1 tadpole), Cuanavale
River lake outlet, -13.09414° 18.89612°, 1,357 m asl;
SAIAB 209054 (4 tadpoles), Cuando River source bog,
-13.00383° 19.12719°, 1,350 m asl. Description: Small
reed frog; rounded snout. Dorsum green, with white
dorso-lateral stripes and small scattered black spots;
Elevation (m)
°
i=)
oO
Map 14. Distribution of Hyperolius nasutus in Angola.
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Amphibians of the Okavango Delta headwater area in Angola
ventrum transparent; pedal webbing formula: I(1), II i/e
(1-0.25), TT (0.75-0.5), IV (0.75-0.5), V (0.5). Male
throat is white. Adult females (n = 14) varied from 15.9—
20.2 (18.5) mm (largest female: PEM A13810); adult
males (n = 21) varied from 13.7—20.3 (17.2) mm (largest
male: INBAC no number). Habitat and natural history
notes: Found on the margins of source lakes, larger
rivers, and cut-off oxbows. Comments: Found at certain
localities in sympatry with Hyperolius cf. invangae (see
above), but can easily be distinguished based on the
rounded snout and larger overall size.
Hyperolius parallelus Gunther, 1858
Angolan Reed Frog (Fig. 16; Map 15)
Material (80 specimens, 6 tadpole lots): PEM A12436-
7, INBAC (no number), Cuchi River gorge, -14.59000°
16.90758°, 1,365 m asl; PEM A12448—-54, Cuanavale
River source lake, -13.08537° 18.89098°, 1,360 m asl:
PEM A12488, Dala River, near Samanunga village,
-12.93169° 18.81458°, 1,363 m asl; PEM A12525,
Muhango village, -12.16310° 18.55430°, 1,430 m asl:
PEM A12520, PEM A12538-42, INBAC (no number),
Cuito River source lake, -12.68935° 18.36012°, 1,431
m asl; PEM A12586—-91, PEM A12827, Calua River
source lake, 6 km SE of Cuito River source, -12.73675°
18.39310°, 1,445 masl; PEM A12683—-4, Huambo HALO
training camp, -12.73726° 15.81828°, 1,665 m asl; PEM
A12851-—56, INBAC: WC-4626, INBAC (no number x2),
Quembo River source lake, -13.13624° 19.04591°, 1,366
masl; PEM A13737 (tadpoles), Comba River, -12.62442°
18.65159°, 1,299 m asl; PEM A13765—6, Lungwebungu
River, old oxbows, -12.58129° 18.67162°, 1,304 m asl;
PEM A13794—8, PEM A13799 (tadpoles), INBAC:
WC-4555, Lake Tchanssengwe, -12.41402° 18.64418°,
1,393 m asl; PEM A14097 (tadpoles), Dala River, near
Samanunga village, -12.93169° 18.18146°, 1,315 m
asl; PEM A14105 (tadpoles), Confluence of Cuito and
Calua rivers, -13.12458° 18.89989°, 1,345 m asl; PEM
A14113 (tadpoles), Cuiva River, -11.98346° 17.72841°,
1,264 m asl; PEM A14683—4, wetland near old quarry
Fig. 16. Adult male Hyperolius parallelus from Cuanavale
River source. Photo by Werner Conradie.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
34
east of Quemba, -12.16960° 18.22965°, 1,353 m asl;
PEM A14698-9, wetland west of Lungwebungu River
camp, -12.55855° 18.6377°, 1,308 m asl; PEM A14726,
Quembo River, oxbow near small waterfall, -13.54257°
19.29551°, 1,233 m asl; PEM A14783—92, INBAC:
WC-7012, INBAC: WC-7008, INBAC: WC-7014, Luio
River camp floodplains, -13.19711° 20.22194°, 1,181
m asl; PEM A14834—-43, INBAC: WC-6928, INBAC:
WC-6928, Lake Hundo, -14.97431° 21.62966°, 1,100 m
asl; PEM A14883—5, PEM A14886 (tadpoles), INBAC:
WC-7083, Luvu River camp, -13.712° 21.83538°, 1,082
m asl; INBAC (no number), Cuiva River bridge on
EN250, -11.98345° 17.72367°, 1,267 m asl. Additional
material (1 specimen, 14 tadpole lots): SATAB 204515
(9 tadpoles), below the outlet of the Cuanavale River
source lake, -13.09364° 18.89597°, 1,357 m asl; SAIAB
209030 (10 tadpoles), small bridge on road to Cuanavale
River source, -12.30714° 18.62333°, 1,399 m asl;
SAIAB 204563 (5 tadpoles), SAIAB 204566 (1 tadpole),
Quembo River source lake, -13.13611° 19.04500°,
1,367 m asl; SAIAB 209025 (1 tadpole), Quembo River
source lake outlet , -13.14025° 19.04822°, 1,365 m asl;
SAIAB 209027 (1 tadpole), Cunde waterfall, -13.77364°
18.75514°, 1,287 m asl; SAIAB 209065 (8 tadpoles),
swamp near Cuanavale River source, -13.10750°
18.86089°, 1,386 m asl; SAIAB 209085 (1 specimen),
Cuanavale River source lake , -13.08997° 18.89561°,
1,358 m asl; SAIAB 204471 (16 tadpoles), frog pan
30 km below Cuando River source camp, -13.06831°
19.34369°, 1,297 m asl; SAIAB 209024 (1 tadpole),
Samununga village, -12.93228° 18.81672°, 1,364 m asl;
SAIAB 209029 (3 tadpoles), south west of Cambuta
on main track, -13.44678° 19.96403°, 1,229 m asl;
SAIAB 209028 (4 tadpoles), Cueve River source, peat
bog source, -12.66949° 18.35203°, 1,420 m asl; SAIAB
209034 (5 tadpoles), Calua River lagoon, -12.73600°
18.39394°, 1,448 m asl; SAIAB 208959 (7 tadpoles),
Cuanavale River source lake outlet, -13.09414°
18.89612°, 1,357 m asl; SAIAB 209031 (6 tadpoles),
Cuanavale River bog above lake, -13.08575° 18.89215°,
-14
Elevation (m)
-16
-18
Map 15. Distribution of Hyperolius parallelus in Angola.
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Conradie et al.
1,356 masl; SAIAB 209035 (7 tadpoles), Cuvango River
- Power station camp, -14.38720° 16.28760°, 1,456 m
asl. Description: Large reed frog. Dorsal coloration
varied from finely vermiculated to boldly patterned:
base color mostly orange to brick red with irregular
black-edged white-cream markings that were often fused
to form irregular stripes, the centers of these markings
exhibited a small red or yellow spot or formed a thin line;
feet and webbing red; ventrum white. Adult females (n
= 24) varied from 26.8—37.2 (32.2) mm (largest female:
PEM A14789); adult males (n = 52) varied from 22.8—
34.7 (29.2) mm (largest male: PEM A12542). Habitat
and natural history notes: All specimens were found
around larger water bodies. Males started calling in the
early evening, high up in trees around the water bodies,
and slowly moved to the water edge during the evening.
Conradie et al. (2021) recorded predation of this species
by the following species of snakes: Crotaphopeltis
hotamboeia, Philothamnus ornatus, Philothamnus
semivariegatus, and Kladirostratus acutus. Comments:
This species was by far the most common frog from all
major waterbodies surveyed. As in the larger viridiflavus
group, many color variations have been described in the
parallelus subgroup (see Channing 2022). The material
from this study conforms to the color pattern recorded for
Hyperolius angolensis Steindachner, 1867, which is now
a synonym of H. parallelus.
Hyperolius raymondi Conradie, Branch, and Tolley, 2013
Raymond’s Reed Frog (Fig. 17; Map 16)
Material (27 specimens, 3 tadpole lots): PEM
A12464—7, INBAC (no number x 2), Cuanavale River
source lake, -13.08537° 18.89098°, 1,360 m asl; PEM
A12514-8, river crossing before Samboano village,
-12.30700° 18.62350°, 1,398 m asl; PEM A12521-2,
PEM A14124 (tadpoles), Cuiva River source, -12.66825°
18.35282°, 1,407 m asl; PEM A12553-8, INBAC
(no number x2), Cuito River source lake, -12.68935°
18.36012°, 1,431 m asl; PEM A12602-3, PEM A14120
(tadpoles), Calua River source lake, 6 km SE of Cuito
River source, -12.73675° 18.39310°, 1,445 m asl; PEM
Fig. 17. Adult male (above) and female (below) Hyperolius
raymondi from river crossing before Samboano village. Photo
by Luke Verburgt.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
A12741, Cuando River source, -13.00346° 19.12751°,
1,353 m asl; PEM A12816, Cuiva River source,
-12.66856° 18.35307°, 1,433 m asl; PEM A13742-3,
Lungwebungu River campsite, -12.58319° 18.66573°,
1,284 m asl; PEM A14127 (tadpoles), confluence of
Cuito and Calua rivers, -12.74878° 18.35433°, 1,393 m
asl. Additional material (1 specimen, 1 tadpole lot):
P2-275 (photograph and tissue sample), wetland near old
quarry east of Quemba, -12.16960° 18.22965°, 1,353 m
asl; SAIAB 209041 (2 tadpoles), Quembo River source
lake, -13.13586° 19.04492°, 1,372 m asl. Description:
Medium sized reed frog. Most males possess two
paravertebral and two dorsolateral black stripes on lime
green to olive background; three males (PEM A12515,
A13742-3) did not exhibit any dorsal stripes, and in one
male (PEM A12816) the stripes faded mid-dorsally and
eventually disappeared. All females devoid of dorsal
markings. Adult females (n = 3) varied from 21.2—23.7
(22.6) mm (largest female: PEM A12555); adult males
(n = 19) varied from 16.5—21.4 (18.8) mm (largest male:
PEM A12816). Habitat and natural history notes:
Found among inundated tall grass next to slow flowing
water. Comments: This recently described species is
currently regarded as endemic to Angola, but is expected
to occur in adjacent DRC (Conradie et al. 2013). Initially,
it was only known from the rivers draining northwards
into the Congo basin (Conradie et al. 2013), and it was
therefore thought to be associated with the Congo fauna.
The discovery of this species in southeastern Angola
corroborates Cei’s (1977) findings that the amphibian
fauna located within the Cubango River system and has
affinities with Congo fauna, due to the apparent lack
of natural barriers between these regions. This is the
southernmost record for Angola for this species, and the
first from the Okavango and Zambezi River catchments.
Hyperolius quinquevittatus Bocage, 1866
Five-striped Reed Frog (Fig. 18; Map 17)
Material (1 specimen): P2-273 (photograph and tissue
sample only), wetland near old quarry east of Quemba,
-12.16960° 18.22965°, 1,353 m asl. Description:
Elevation (m)
3
So
oO
Map 16. Distribution of Hyperolius raymondi in Angola.
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Amphibians of the Okavango Delta headwater area in Angola
Fig. 18. Adult male Hyperolius quinquevittatus from wetland
east of Quemba town. Photo by Pedro Vaz Pinto.
Medium sized reed frog; pointed snout; long slender
limbs. Dorsum dark brown, with a single vertebral
and two dorsolateral light green stripes. Habitat and
natural history notes: Found in a flooded grassland,
surrounded by miombo woodland. Founded syntopically
with Kassinula wittei, Hyperolius raymondi, and H.
cf. invangae. Comments: This record represents an
eastward range extension in Angola. It has been recorded
from northwestern Zambia (Poynton and Broadley
1987, 1991; Channing 2001; Bittencourt 2019), and like
Kassinula wittei and Kassina kuvangensis, this species 1s
thus expected to occur to the north and east of the defined
study area.
Hyperolius aff. bocagei Steindachner, 1867
Bocage’s Reed Frog (Figs. 19-21; Map 18)
Material (74 specimens, 10 tadpole lots): PEM A12423,
Cunde waterfall, -13.77390° 18.75520°, 1,287 m asl;
PEM A12455-60, PEM A14085-6 (tadpoles) Cuanavale
River source lake, -13.08537° 18.89098°, 1,340 m
asl; PEM A12489, PEM A14098 (tadpoles), INBAC
(no number), Dala River, near Samanunga village,
-12.93169° 18.81458°, 1,363 m asl; PEM A12508-12,
river crossing before Samboano village, -12.30700°
18.62350°, 1,397 m asl; PEM A12543-52, INBAC
Elevation (m)
S
°
Oo
Map 18. Distribution of Hyperolius aff. bocagei in Angola.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Elevation (m)
I
ra
Oo
So
Fig. 19. Adult male Hyperolius aff. bocagei (green form) from
Cuito River source. Photo by Werner Conradie.
Fig. 20. Adult male Hyperolius aff. bocagei (red form) from
Cuanavale River source. Photo by Werner Conradie.
Fig. 21. Adult male Hyperolius aff. bocagei (brown form) from
Cuito River source. Photo by Werner Conradie.
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Conradie et al.
(no number x2), Cuito River source lake, -12.68935°
18.36012°, 1,431 m asl; PEM A12592-8, Calua River
source lake, 6 km SE of Cuito River source, -12.73675°
18.39310°, 1,446 m asl; PEM A12619, Stop 1: road to
Cuito River source, -12.25050° 18.63730°, 1,556 m asl;
PEM A12674, Camp 3, Malova Village, Mipanha River,
-14.09140° 16.41476°, 1,553 m asl; PEM A12734-7,
INBAC: WC-4833, INBAC (no number x2), Cuando
River source, -13.00346° 19.12751°, 1,553 m asl; PEM
A12788-9, INBAC: WC-4614, Quembo River, source
trap 2, -13.13544° 19.04397°, 1,374 m asl; PEM A14112
(tadpoles), Cuiva River, -11.98346° 17.72841°, 1,264
m asl; PEM A12815, PEM A14125 (tadpoles), Cuiva
River source, -12.66856° 18.35307°, 1,407 m asl; PEM
A12857, INBAC: WC-4616; INBAC (no number x5)
Quembo River source lake, -13.13624° 19.04591°,
1,411 m asl; PEM A13767—72, INBAC: WC-6979
Lungwebungu River, old oxbows, -12.58129° 18.67162°,
1,304 m asl; PEM A13800—2, PEM A13803 (tadpoles),
Lake Tchanssengwe, -12.41402° 18.64417°, 1,415 masl;
PEM A14090 (tadpoles), 4 km upstream from Cuanavale
River source, -13.05084° 18.89726°, 1,394 m asl; PEM
A14103 (tadpoles), 4 km downstream from Cuanavale
River source camp, -13.11585° 18.90246°, 1,354 m
asl; PEM A14106 (tadpoles), confluence of Cuito and
Calua rivers, -13.12458° 18.89989°, 1,345 m asl; PEM
A14686, detour route just across bridge over Cuiva
River, -12.13942° 18.39393°, 1,385 m asl; PEM A14693
(tadpoles), Lungwebungu River camp, first oxbow on
right side, -12.58117° 18.67106°, 1,294 m asl; PEM
A14717, en route from Samanunga village to Cuanavale
River source, -12.94331° 18.81118°, 1,407 m asl; PEM
A14727-8, Quembo River, oxbow near small waterfall,
-13.54257° 19.29551°, 1,233 m asl; PEM A14748-9,
PEM A14763—65, PEM A14778, Quembo River right
side tributary (Micongo River) past village, -13.51877°
19.28487°, 1,248 m asl; PEM A14757, left side tributary
(Condinde River) at Cuando River bridge, -13.60076°
19.52675° 1,219 m asl. Additional material (16
tadpole lots): SAIAB 204553 (7 tadpoles), Cuanavale
River source lake, -13.08997° 18.89389°, 1,358 m asl:
SAIAB 209059 (15 tadpoles), Cuanavale River near
confluence, -13.12478° 18.90017°, 1,347 m asl; SAIAB
204509 (29 tadpoles), outlet from Kuembo River source
lake, -13.13689° 19.03144°, 1,375 m asl; SAITAB 204564
(25 tadpoles), SAIAB 209074 (1 tadpole), Quembo
River source lake, -13.13611° 19.04500°, 1,366 m asl;
SAIAB 209066 (9 tadpoles), Quembo River source lake,
-13.14025° 19.04822°, 1,365 m asl; SAIAB 209062 (2
tadpoles), swamp near Cuanavale River source lake camp,
-13.10750° 18.86089°, 1,386 m asl; SAIAB 204465
(19 tadpoles), Cuando River source pool, -13.00383°
19.12719°, 1,350 m asl; SAIAB 209060 (2 tadpoles),
stream outflow about 2.6 km downstream of source lake,
-13.00317° 19.15153°, 1,331 m asl; SAIAB 204472 (13
tadpoles), Cuando River, -13.09142° 19.35850°, 1,283
m asl; SAIAB 209067 (8 tadpoles), on Cuanavale River
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
road, -13.14190° 19.44503°, 1,301 masl; SATAB 209070
(10 tadpoles), pan near Cuanavale River camp, seepage,
-13.10750° 18.86089°, 1,387 m asl; SAIAB 204569 (13
tadpoles), Samununga village, -12.93228° 18.81672°,
1,365 m asl; SAIAB 209063 (6 tadpoles), small stream
3 km below Cuanavale River source camp, -13.12539°
18.89914°, 1,344 m asl; SATAB 209069 (11 tadpoles),
pool in wetland on road edge, west of Munhango,
-12.17806° 18.24306°, 1,370 m asl; SAIAB 209075
(18 tadpoles), Cuando River source bog, -13.00383°
19.12719°, 1,350 masl. Description: Medium sized reed
frog; rounded snout; reduced webbing; ventrum granular.
Three different color forms were observed, 1.e., plain light
to dark green, brown, and bright red; thin dorsolateral
white stripe present; small white specks on dorsal side
of legs; toes and webbing red. Tadpoles with ventrum
spotted and ventral blotches remain present in juveniles
but fade in adults. Adult females (n = 11) varied from
16.7-21.9 (19.6) mm (largest female: PEM A12549),;
adult males (n = 52) varied from 14.8—21.1 (18.7) mm
(largest male: PEM A12592). Habitat and natural
history notes: Found at the margins of large rivers and
source lakes within dense emergent wetland vegetation.
Sympatric with other species of Hyperolius, mostly H.
nasutus and H. parallelus. Comments: Initially we
assigned these specimens to H. bocagei (NGOWP 2017),
however it 1s generally regarded as a larger species that
is associated with the viridiflavus group (see Schietz
1999). This new material differs in size (smaller) and
webbing (less webbing) from H. bocagei (Schietz 1999).
Phylogenetic work is currently underway to determine its
taxonomic status.
Kassina kuvangensis (Monard, 1937)
Kuvangu Kassina (Fig. 22; Map 19)
Material (9 specimens, 5 tadpole lots): PEM A12496-
7, unnamed side-triburaty source of Cuanavale River,
-13.07518° 18.88481°, 1,374 m asl; PEM A12775-6,
Quembo River, trap 4, -13.13586° 19.04709°, 1,369 m
asl; PEM A12781, Quembo River trap 1, -13.13592°
19.04417°, 1,369 m asl; PEM A12825, Quembo River,
trap 3, -13.13073° 19.03725°, 1,445 m asl; PEM A14116
(tadpoles), river crossing before Sombanana village,
-12.30710° 18.62350°, 1,407 m asl; PEM A12828,
PEM A14119 (tadpoles), Calua River source 6 km SE
of Cuito River source, -12.73675° 18.39310°, 1,446
m asl; PEM A14089 (tadpoles), 4 km upstream from
Cuanavale River source, -13.05084° 18.89726°, 1,394
m asl; PEM A14096, Dala River, near Samanga village,
-12.93169° 18.81458°, 1,363 m asl; PEM A14101
(tadpoles), 4 km downstream from Cuanavale River
source camp, -13.11585° 18.90246°, 1,354 m asl; PEM
A14104 (tadpoles), confluence of Cuito and Calua rivers,
-13.12458° 18.89989°, 1,345 m asl; PEM A14804, Luio
River camp floodplains, -13.19711° 20.22194°, 1,181
m asl. Additional material (4 tadpole lots): SAIAB
209127 (1 tadpole), SAIAB 209107 (2 tadpoles), swamp
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Amphibians of the Okavango Delta headwater area in Angola
Fig. 22. Adult female Kassina kuvangensis from Cuanavale
River source. Photo by Werner Conradie.
near Cuanavale River lake camp, -13.10750° 18.86089°,
1,386 masl; SATAB 209108 (22 tadpoles), pool in wetland
on road edge west of Munhango, -12.17806° 18.24306°,
1,381 m asl; SAIAB 209089 (4 tadpoles), Calua lagoon,
-12.73599° 18.39394°, 1,448 m asl. Description: Large
sized Kassina; tympanum visible; elliptical vertical
pupils; large inner metatarsal tubercle; subarticular
tubercle well-developed. Dorsum very dark olive-brown,
with scattered large darker brown yellow-edged irregular
shaped spots; ventrum yellow, but in some individuals
has black-edged white/yellow spots. In females, the cloaca
sides are swollen. In males, the gular flap is dark and the
glands behind eye/head are enlarged. Adult females (n
= 2) varied from 51.9-53.3 (52.6) mm (largest female:
PEM A14096); adult males (n = 7) varied from 38.4—52.9
(43.7) mm (largest male: PEM A12781). Tadpoles can get
very large (up to 135 mm total length); LTRF 1/2(1), with
strong jaw sheaths. Habitat and natural history notes:
In the evenings, males call from the margins of source
lakes and flooded areas while clinging to vegetation,
and quickly submerge themselves when disturbed.
Comments: These new records and other records from
Uige Province, which are the northwesternmost records
(Ernst et al. 2020), represent the first adult K. Auvangensis
Fig. 23. Adult female Kassina senegalensis from Culua River
source. Photo by Werner Conradie.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
|
"
|
I
Elevation (m)
°
Oo
oO
eh
“14
-16
-18
Map 19. Distribution of Kassina kuvangensis in Angola.
for Angola since the original species description (Monard
1937). The new localities recorded here lie between the
Species type locality in Angola (Kuvango, Monard 1937)
and western Zambia (Poynton and Broadley 1987, 1991;
Channing 2001).
Kassina senegalensis (Dumeéril and Bibron, 1841)
Bubbling Kassina (Fig. 23; Map 20)
Material (56 specimens, 3 tadpole lots): PEM
A12604—7, Calua River source, 6 km SE of Cuito
River source, -12.73675° 18.39310°, 1,445 m asl; PEM
A12621, Cutata River, -12.56916° 16.49334°, 1,647
m asl; PEM A12699—700, Lungwebungu River camp
bridge crossing, -12.58347° 18.66598°, 1,304 m asl;
PEM A12785, Cuando River source trap 4, -13.00164°
19.12960°, 1,374 m asl; PEM A12790, Quembo River
trap 2, -13.13544° 19.04397°, 1,374 m asl; PEM
A12829-30, Culua River source, -12.73723° 18.39340°,
1,444 m asl; PEM A12863-9, INBAC (no number x2),
Quembo River source lake, -13.13624° 19.04591°, 1,366
m asl; PEM A13744 (tadpoles), Lungwebungu River
campsite, -12.58319° 18.66573°, 1,284 m asl; PEM
A13757-62, INBAC: WC-6261, Lungwebungu River,
trap 2, -12.58199° 18.66562°, 1,208 m asl; PEM A14094
Elevation (m)
S
oO
=)
Map 20. Distribution of Kassina senegalensis in Angola.
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Conradie et al.
(tadpoles), series of pans south of Tempué, -13.55719°
18.85519°, 1,315 m asl; PEM A14109 (tadpoles), Cutata
River, -12.56916° 16.49334°, 1,647 m asl; PEM A14687,
PEM A14700, INBAC: WC-6759, Lungwebungu
River camp, -12.58439° 18.66748°, 1,297 m asl; PEM
A14718, PEM A14722, Quembo River bridge camp,
-13.52746° 19.28060°, 1,241 m asl; PEM A14753-4,
PEM A14766, Quembo River right side tributary
(Micongo River) past village, -13.51877° 19.28487°,
1,248 m asl; PEM A14805—9, INBAC: WC-7017, Luio
River camp floodplains, -13.19711° 20.22194°, 1,181
m asl; PEM A14844—-50, PEM A14867—72, INBAC:
WC-6916, INBAC: WC-6917, INBAC: WC-6953, Lake
Hundo, -14.97431° 21.62966°, 1,100 m asl. Additional
material (1 tadpole lot): SAIAB 209106 (28 tadpoles),
small wooden bridge across wetland on road between
Cuanavale River source camp and Munhango, -12.30714°
18.62333°, 1,399 m asl. Description: Medium sized
Kassina; elliptical vertical pupils; tympanum visible.
Dorsum yellow-mustard, with irregular shaped dark
brown blotches, sometimes fused to form a vertebral
stripe; ventrum white. In females, the cloaca is swollen,
with papillae pointed downward. Male throats are black.
Adult females (n = 16) varied from 27.9-41.1 (37.6)
mm (largest female: INBAC: WC-6759); adult males (n
= 34) varied from 35.2-43.6 (39.2) mm (largest male:
PEM A14809). Habitat and natural history notes:
This species was found in sympatry with K. kuvangensis
in the study area, although not syntopically. Kassina
senegalensis was found in more open habitat or sparse
vegetation, calling from the edges of waterbodies,
while K. kuvangensis was only heard calling from well-
vegetated floodplains and source lakes. Comments:
Schietz (1999) divided material of K. senegalensis
into different forms, based on the dorsal markings. As
pointed out by Poynton and Broadley (1987), there is
considerable overlap in these color forms between and
within populations. Due to the large distributional range
of this species from Senegal to South Africa (Channing
and Rodel 2019), spanning many different habitats and
f
Elevation (m)
3
oO
oOo
Map 21. Distribution of Kassinula wittei in Angola.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
biomes, cryptic species are expected, and this species
needs a broad-scale phylogeographic study.
Kassinula wittei Laurent, 1940
De Witte’s Clicking Frog (Figs. 24—25; Map 21)
Material (48 specimens): PEM A12468—-5, PEM
A12792-3, INBAC (no number x2), Cuanavale River
source lake, -13.08537° 18.89098°, 1,360 m asl; PEM
A12807-—12, INBAC (no number x3), Cuito River source
lake, -12.68727° 18.36067°, 1,423 m asl; PEM A12817—
8, Cuiva River source, -12.66856° 18.35307°, 1,433 m
asl; PEM A12870—2, INBAC (no number x2), Quembo
River source lake, -13.13624° 19.04591°, 1,366 m asl;
PEM A14271-3, INBAC: WC-6743, Lungwebungu
River camp, first oxbow on right side, -12.58117°
18.67106°, 1,294 m asl; PEM A14274—5, Cuanavale
River source, -13.08537° 18.89098°, 1,357 m asl; PEM
A14276—80, Quembo River right side tributary (Micongo
River) past village, -13.51877° 19.28487°, 1,248 m asl;
PEM A14281-4, INBAC: WC- 6958-60, Luio River
camp floodplains, -13.20191° 20.22144°, 1,181 m asl;
PEM A14270, PEM A14285, wetland near old quarry
east of Quemba, -12.16960° 18.22965°, 1,353 m asl.
Additional material (4 specimens): P2-278, P2-279,
Fig. 24. Adult male Kassinula wittei from Cuanavale River
source. Photo by Werner Conradie.
Fig. 25. Adult male Kassinula cf. wittei from wetland east of
Quemba town. Photo by Chad Keates.
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Amphibians of the Okavango Delta headwater area in Angola
P2-280, P2-281, wetland near old quarry east of Quemba,
-12.16960° 18.22965°, 1,353 m asl. Description:
Minute hyperoliid species. See Conradie et al. (2020b)
for a detailed description of this material. The only
female measured 14.7 mm (PEM A14284); adult males
varied from 12.3—22.0 (14.2) mm (largest male: PEM
A14270). Habitat and natural history notes: Found in
flooded grassland and peat wetlands. Comments: The
occurrence of this species in northeastern Angola was
expected from a biogeographical point of view, but these
are the first records of the species for the country. These
new records extend the known range of this species
from northwestern Zambia and southern DRC to central
Angola by more than 400 km (see Conradie et al. 2020b).
The taxonomic status of this genus has recently been
validated phylogenetically and the species is considered
to be closely related to Afrixalus, although its exact
systematic placement remains unclear (see Conradie et
al. 2020b; Ne€as et al. 2022).
Two specimens (PEM A14270, PEM A14285) differ
in the dorsal coloration pattern (vertebral band broken
and no darker stipples in lighter bands versus continuous
dark vertebral band and lighter bands, with fine dark
stipples), maximum size (22 mm versus 16.7 mm), and
potential differences in habitat preference from other
K. wittei collected. These two specimens are similar in
appearance to a specimen collected from Congolo River,
Luando Strict Nature Reserve (FHK091) (see Conradie
et al. 2020b). While Ne€as et al. (2022) pointed out the
relatively deep divergence between the specimen from
Congolo River and the eastern Angolan and topotypic
DRC samples, this difference was not considered in
Conradie et al. (2020b). Preliminary unpublished genetic
results (W. Conradie, unpub. data) show that the two
specimens listed here agree genetically with the western
Angolan sample (Congolo River) and may represent
an undescribed cryptic species. These specimens occur
syntopically with typical K. wittei east of Quemba,
although collected from different habitats and different
times of the year.
Fig. 26. Adult female Phrynobatrachus mababiensis from
Cutatu River. Photo by Werner Conradie.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Phrynobatrachidae
Phrynobatrachus mababiensis FitzSimons, 1932
complex
Dwarf Puddle Frog (Fig. 26; Map 22)
Material (14 specimens, 1 tadpole lot): PEM A12429,
series of pans south of Tempué, -13.55719° 18.85519°,
1,315 masl; PEM A12608, Calua River source, 6 km SE
of Cuito River source, -12.73675° 18.39310°, 1,445 m
asl; PEM A12622, Cutata River, -12.56916° 16.49334°,
1,647 m asl; PEM A12662, Campsite 2 near old
Cuvango Mission, -13.33451° 16.41280°, 1,542 m asl;
PEM A12688, Cubango 2017 launch site, -12.61700°
16.22133°, 1,727 m asl; PEM A12777, Quembo River
source, trap 4, -13.13586° 19.04709°, 1,373 m_ asl;
PEM A12840-1, west of Cuito town on Aludungo rd,
-12.28700° 16.81716°, 1,739 m asl; PEM A12889,
Quembo River source lake, -13.13624° 19.04591°,
1,366 m asl; PEM A13739, Lungwebungu River, new
campsite, -12.58445° 18.66538°, 1,308 m asl; PEM
A14743, Quembo River bridge camp, trap 2, -13.52816°
19.28067°, 1,240 m asl; PEM A14779, Quembo River
bridge camp, trap 1, -13.52801° 19.28147°, 1,236 m asl;
PEM A14873, wetland south of Lake Hundo, -15.01099°
21.63608°, 1,100 m asl; PEM A14114 (tadpoles), river
before Sombanana village, -12.30710° 18.62350°, 1,407
m asl; INBAC: WC-5221, Campsite 2 near old Cuvango
Mission, -13.33451° 16.41280°, 1,542 m asl. Additional
material (3 tadpole lots): SAIAB 209079 (14 tadpoles),
road to Cuanavale River camp, -12.54990° 18.67444°,
1,333 m asl; SAIAB 209105 (10 tadpoles), swamp
near Cuanavale River source lake camp, 1,386 m asl;
SAIAB 209111 (9 tadpoles), small wooden bridge across
wetland on road between Cuanavale River source camp
and Munhango, -12.30714° 18.62333°, 1,399 m asl.
Description: Small Phrynobatrachus; scattered small
warts present on the back; up to three and a half phalanges
of longest toe free of webbing. Dorsum light brown, with
scattered darker brown markings; lower lip barred in black
and white; ventrum varied from immaculate to mottled
Elevation (m)
S
oOo
oO
Map 22. Distribution of Phrynobatrachus mababiensis
complex in Angola.
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Conradie et al.
with black. Males with black throats. Adult females (n
= 3) varied from 12.8—18.0 (16.2) mm (largest female:
PEM A14743); adult males (n = 3) varied from 12.6—
17.2 (14.7) mm (largest male: PEM A14779). Habitat
and natural history notes: Found on edges of rivers and
source lakes among marginal vegetation. Comments:
Numerous cryptic species have been documented within
P. mababiensis as currently recognized (Zimkus and
Schick 2010; Zimkus et al. 2010), and the new material
recorded here may represent more than one species (N.
Baptista et al., unpub. data). Until further phylogenetic
studies are conducted, this material is all included in the
P. mababiensis complex.
Phrynobatrachus natalensis (Smith, 1849)
Snoring Puddle Frog (Fig. 27; Map 23)
Material (20 specimens): PEM A12637-8, Cuanavale
River, -13.37406° 18.99269°, 1,297 m asl; PEM A12711,
Lungwebungu River camp bridge crossing, -12.58347°
18.66598°, 1,304 m asl; PEM A12890-3, INBAC: WC-
4599, INBAC (no number) , Quembo River source
lake, -13.13624° 19.04591°, 1,366 m asl; PEM A13738,
Comba River, -12.62442° 18.65159°, 1,299 m asl:
PEM A13745—8, Lungwebungu River old campsite,
-12.58319° 18.66573°, 1,284 m asl; PEM A14690, PEM
A14705-6, INBAC: WC-6740, Lungwebungu River
camp, -12.58439° 18.66748°, 1,297 m asl; PEM A14707,
wetland west of Lungwebungu River camp, -12.55855°
18.63770°, 1,308 m asl; PEM A14810—-1, Luio River
camp floodplains, -13.19711° 20.22194°, 1,181 m asl.
Additional material (1 specimen): SAIAB 209104 (1
specimen), swamp near Cuanavale River source lake
camp, -13.10750° 18.86089°, 1,386 m asl. Description:
Medium sized Phrynobatrachus; dorsum with scattered
elevated tubercles; reduced webbing; heel spine present;
small outer metatarsal tubercle; large inner metatarsal
tubercle; ridge running along outer toe; small tarsal ridge:
mid-tarsal tubercle present; well-developed elevated
subarticular tubercle. Dorsum coloration varies from grey
to brown and even green; ventrum white. Female throats
Fig. 27. Adult male Phrynobatrachus natalensis from Luio
River. Photo by Chad Keates.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
are speckled, while throats of males are uniformly grey
to black. Adult females (n = 15) varied from 23.6—32.6
(28.1) mm (largest female: PEM A13745); adult males
(n = 5) varied from 26.3—30.4 (28.2) mm (largest male:
PEM A14705). Habitat and natural history notes:
Found in flooded grasslands associated with miombo
woodland. Comments: This species is widespread in
Angola (Marques et al. 2018). Although there were
no records for southeastern Angola prior to Conradie
et al. (2016), they are widespread east of the Zambian
border (Poynton and Broadley 1985b, 1991; Channing,
2001). This is another complex within Phrynobatrachus
containing several cryptic species, and thus deserving of
further investigation (Zimkus et al. 2010; Bittencourt-
Silva 2019).
Pipidae
Xenopus petersii Bocage, 1895
Peters’ Clawed Frog (Fig. 28; Map 24)
Material (40 specimens): PEM A11617—-9, PEM
A12576—-84, INBAC (no number x 4), Cuito River
source lake, -12.68935° 18.36012°, 1,431 m_ asl;
PEM A12430-3, pans south of Tempue, -13.55719°
18.85519°, 1,315 m asl; PEM A12519, river crossing
before Samboano village, -12.30700° 18.62350°, 1,397
m asl; PEM A12613—5, Calua River source, 6 km SE
of Cuito River source, -12.73675° 18.39310°, 1,446 m
asl; PEM A12634—5, roadside ditch 10 km SW of Cuito
town, -12.44815° 16.88118°, 1,742 masl; PEM A12682,
Camp 3, Malova Village, Mipanha River, -14.09140°
16.41476°, 1,553 m asl; PEM A12691—2, INBAC:
WC-5175, Cubango River launch site, -12.61700°
16.22133°, 1,727 m asl; PEM A12694, Cubango River
source site, -12.66256° 16.09324°, 1,771 m asl; PEM
A12695, INBAC: WC-5173, New dam, Katchingo,
-12.60587° 16.22003°, 1,373 m asl; PEM A12697,
Chicala Choloanga roadside quarry, -12.63611°
16.04282°, 1,858 m asl; PEM A12779—-80, Quembo
River, trap 4, -13.13586° 19.04709°, 1,373 m asl;
Elevation (m)
S
(=)
oO
Map 23. Distribution of Phrynobatrachus natalensis in Angola.
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Amphibians of the Okavango Delta headwater area in Angola
Fig. 28. Adult female Xenopus petersii from Cuito town. Photo
by Werner Conradie.
PEM A12909, Quembo River source lake, -13.13624°
19.04591°, 1,411 m asl; PEM A13756, Lungwebungu
River old campsite, -12.58319° 18.66573°, 1,284 m asl:
PEM A13817, river crossing before Samboano village,
-12.20672° 18.06236°, 1,387 m asl; PEM A14776,
Quembo River right side tributary (Micongo River) past
village, -13.51877° 19.28487°, 1,248 m asl. Additional
material (9 specimens, 1 tadpole lot): SAIAB 204517
(1 specimen), Lungwebungu River Bridge, -12.58397°
18.66536°, 1,295 m asl; SAIAB 204468 (1 tadpole),
main road bridge over upper Kwanza east of cuito,
-11.98433° 17.72197°, 1,267 m asl; SAIAB 204500
(1 specimen), small wooden bridge across wetland on
road between Cuanavale source camp and Munhango,
-12.30714° 18.62333°, 1,399 m asl; SAIAB 204502
(6 specimens), pool in wetland on road edge west of
Munhango, -12.17806° 18.24306°, 1,370 m asl; SAIAB
209086 (1 specimen), Cuvango mission rapids camp,
-13.32782° 16.41106°, 1,538 m asl. Description:
Medium to large sized pipid; dorsum smooth; eyes on
top of head; three clawed toes, no claw on prehallux:
extensive webbing. Dorsum varies from light to dark
brown; posterior half of ventrum and thighs with orange
pigmentation. Adult females (n = 24) varied from 34.2—
Elevation (m)
Map 25. Distribution of Xenopus poweri in Angola.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
42
Elevation (m)
Map 24. Distribution of Xenopus petersii in Angola.
74.2 (52.4) mm (largest female: PEM A12682); adult
males (n= 16) varied from 37.9-51.2 (45.5) mm (largest
male: PEM A11619). Habitat and natural history
notes: Aquatic species found in all major waterbodies
surveyed. Comments: Furman et al. (2015) split X.
petersii and X. poweri, restricting the former mostly to
western Angola northward to Gabon. In Angola, this
species seems to be absent from the south and east,
where it is replaced by X. muelleri and/or _X. poweri.
Xenopus poweri Hewitt, 1927
Powers’ Clawed Frog (Map 25)
Material (13 specimens): PEM A14856-66, INBAC:
WC-7040, INBAC: WC-7043, Lake Hundo, -14.97431°
21.62966°, 1,100 m asl. Description: Medium sized
pipid; dorsum smooth; eyes on top of head; three
clawed toes, no claw on prehallux; extensive webbing.
Dorsum varies from light to dark brown, with scattered
darker markings; ventrum grayish, with scattered darker
blotches. Adult females (n = 6) varied from 55.6—65.9
(59.8) mm (largest female: PEM A14861); adult males
(n = 6) varied from 43.1—51.2 (48.8) mm (largest male:
PEM A14858). Habitat and natural history notes:
After a heavy thunderstorm, numerous XY. poweri were
found moving over land away from the waterbodies.
Comments: Only recorded from lower elevations of
eastern Angola, associated with open and dry savanna.
Only a limited number of records exist of this species
from eastern Angola (Conradie et al. 2016; Marques et
al. 2018).
Ptychadenidae
Ptychadena bunoderma (Boulenger, 1907)
Rough Ridged Frog (Fig. 29; Map 26)
Material (2 specimens): PEM A12778, Quembo River
source, trap 4, -13.13586° 19.04709°, 1,369 m asl; PEM
A12476, Cuanavale River source lake, -13.08537°
18.89100°, 1,360 m asl. Description: Small stocky
Ptychadena, dorsum warty, with no clear ridges as in
other Ptychadena species; short stubby legs; very reduced
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Conradie et al.
Fig. 29. Adult male Ptychadena bunoderma from Cuanavale
River source lake. Photo by Werner Conradie.
webbing, four phalanges of the 4" toe free of webbing.
Dorsum dark brown to olive, with scattered white to
brown elevated tubercles; lower lip gray with white bars;
back of thighs with scattered light spots. The only adult
male measured 25.6 mm (PEM A12778). Habitat and
natural history notes: Specimens were found in trap
arrays (see Conradie et al. 2021) set up next to flooded
areas of source lakes. They were never heard calling, and
either have a very cryptic call or were not vocal during
the survey periods. Comments: In Angola, this species
is only known from the east, based on historical records
(Marques et al. 2018). No new collections were made
until Ernst et al. (2020) recorded a series of specimens
from northwestern Angola. Elsewhere, it is known from
northwestern Zambia (Channing 2001; Channing and
Rodel 2019). Our new material represents a new record
for southeastern Angola and the Okavango River basin.
Ptychadena grandisonae Laurent, 1954
Many-ridged Grass Frog (Fig. 30; Map 27)
Material (3 specimens): PEM A12696, INBAC: WC-
5185, Chicala Choloanga roadside quarry, -12.63611°
16.04282°, 1,858 m asl; PEM A12689, Cubango
River launch site, -12.61700° 16.22133°, 1,727 m asl.
Fig. 30. Adult male Ptychadena grandisonae from upper
Cubango River. Photo by Werner Conradie.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Elevation (m)
=)
So
3
Map 26. Distribution of Ptychadena bunoderma in Angola.
Description: Medium sized Ptychadena; narrow body;
ridges present on thigh; two and a half phalanges of the
longest toe free of webbing. Dorsum light brown, with
darker brown blotches; back of thighs with pale stripes;
yellow infusion in groin. Only adult male measured
36.2 mm (PEM A12689). Habitat and natural history
notes: This species was only encountered along the
Cubango River in flooded grassland. Comments: The
identification was based on the key provided by Poynton
and Broadley (1985b) and needs genetic verification.
Ptychadena upembae (Schmidt and Inger, 1959)
Upemba Ridged Frog (Map 28)
Material (1 specimen): PEM A14829, camp at side
tributary (Luandai River) of the Luanguinga River,
-13.70885° 21.26234°, 1,116 m asl. Description:
Medium sized Ptychadena; elongated body; longitudinal
dorsal ridges present; long toes; reduced webbing, with
up to three phalanges of longest toe free of webbing.
Dorsum brown to beige with black and brown spots;
black facial mask, from snout through eye to forearm;
broad light vertebral band present; thin light line on
dorsal tibia; back of thighs with light and dark bands;
ventrum light yellow. Only adult male measured 37.7
Elevation (m)
Map 27. Distribution of Ptychadena grandisonae in Angola.
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Amphibians of the Okavango Delta headwater area in Angola
Elevation (m)
ra
So
oO
Map 28. Distribution of Ptychadena upembae in Angola.
mm (PEM A14829). Habitat and natural history
notes: Found in grassland alongside a large river during
the day. Comments: Identification was based on the
key provided by Poynton and Broadley (1985b). Only a
few records of this species exist for central and eastern
Angola (Marques et al. 2018). Re-examination of material
recorded by Conradie et al. (2016) of Pitychadena guibei
also conform to this species.
Ptychadena keilingi (Monard, 1937)
Keiling’s Ridged Frog (Fig. 31; Map 29)
Material (38 specimens): PEM A12428, Cutva River
bridge on EN250, -11.98345° 17.72367°, 1,267m asl; PEM
A12477-8, INBAC (no number x2), Cuanavale River
source lake, -13.08537° 18.89098°, 1,360 m asl; PEM
A12491, Dala River, near Samanunga village, -12.93170°
18.81458°, 1,363 m asl; PEM A12559-61, Cuito River
source lake, -12.68935° 18.36012°, 1,431 m asl; PEM
A12646, outlet of Cuito River source lake, -12.70453°
18.35445°, 1,429 m asl; PEM A12752-9, INBAC: WC-
4797, (no number x2), Cuando River source, -13.00346°
19.12751°, 1,353 m asl; PEM A12782, Quembo River,
trap 1, -13.13592° 19.04417°, 1,369 m asl; PEM A12822—
4, Cutva River source, -12.66856° 18.35307°, 1,433 m
Fig. 31. Adult male Ptychadena keilingi from Cuito River
source. Photo by Werner Conradie.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
asl; PEM A12894—-6, INBAC: WC-4691, INBAC: (no
number x1), Quembo River source lake, -13.13624°
19.04591°, 1,366 m asl; PEM A13818-19, en route to
Cuemba Village, -11.96587° 17.76176°, 1,302 m asl; PEM
A14694, Lungwebungu River camp, right bank past first
oxbow, -12.57956° 18.67761°, 1,295 m asl; PEM A14736,
Quembo River, walk back from small waterfall, -13.52988°
19.28340°, 1,242 m asl; PEM A14780, Quembo River
bridge camp, trap 1, -13.52801° 19.28147°, 1,236 m asl;
PEM A14781, INBAC: WC-6962, Quembo River right
side tributary (Micongo River) past village, -13.51877°
19.28487°, 1,248 m asl; PEM A14894, wetland near old
quarry east of Quemba, -12.16960° 18.22965°, 1,353
m asl. Additional specimens (2 specimens): SAIAB
204561 (2 specimens), Quembo River source lake,
-13.13611° 19.04500°, 1,367 m asl. Description: Medium
sized Ptychadena, elongated body; longitudinal dorsal
ridges present; rostrum protruding well beyond lower
jaw and forming a very pointed and elongated keratinized
protrusion; long toes; reduced webbing, with up to four
phalanges of longest toe free of webbing. Dorsum colorful:
red infusions on the flanks; black facial mask, from snout
through eye to forearm; broad light vertebral band present;
thin light line on dorsal tibia; top of thighs with light and
dark bands; ventrum immaculate, with black spots on
chest in some specimens; black spot in front of arm that
connects with lower jaw; lower jaw with spots; back of
thighs with irregular longitudinal black and yellow stripes.
Adult females (n = 19) varied from 24.6—39.9 (34.8) mm
(largest female: PEM A12755); adult males (n= 14) varied
from 25.3-31.5 (27.9) mm (largest male: PEM A14894).
Habitat and natural history notes: Found in the flooded
margins of rivers and lakes. Comments: Originally
described from Dala, in north-eastern Angola (Laurent
1964). It is only known from northeastern Angola (Laurent
1964; Marques et al. 2018), western Zambia (Channing
2001), and southwestern DRC (Channing and Rodel
2019). This is the southernmost record for this species,
and a new species record for southeastern Angola and the
Okavango River basin.
Elevation (m)
3
So
oO
I | | lee |
12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Map 29. Distribution of Ptychadena keilingi in Angola.
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Conradie et al.
Fig. 32. Adult male Ptychadena oxyrhynchus from Cuito town.
Photo by Werner Conradie.
Ptychadena oxyrhynchus (Smith, 1849)
Sharp-nosed Ridged Frog (Fig. 32; Map 30)
Material (6 specimens): PEM A12628, roadside ditch
10 km SW of Cuito town, -12.44815° 16.88118°, 1,742
m asl; PEM A12667, Campsite 1 below Cubango River
rapids, west of Fundo village, -13.04483° 16.37520°,
1,585 m asl; PEM A12835-6, 31 km W of Menongue,
Cueli River, -14.70511° 17.38014°, 1,392 m asl; PEM
A14830, camp at side tributary (Luandai River) of the
Luanguinga River, -13.70885° 21.26234°, 1,116 m asl.
Additional material (1 specimen): SAIAB 204559 (1
specimen), half-way house road just outside Munhango
village, pools in road. Description: Large and robust
Ptychadena, sharp pointed snout; clear longitudinal
dorsal ridges; extensive webbing, with one phalange on
outer toe (5") free of webbing; large pointed subarticular
tubercles on toes; small inner metatarsal tubercle; outer
metatarsal tubercle absent; enlarged palmar tubercles;
ventrum smooth. Dorsum light brown to gray, with
scatted dark spots (PEM A12628 with unusual orange
dorsum and yellow infusion in the outer thigh region);
pale triangle on snout; lower jaw barred; back of thigh
with irregular white blotches or spots that are sometimes
fused; ventrum immaculate. Adult males (n = 5) varied
from 44.1—51.9 (47.7) mm (largest male: PEM A12835).
Fig. 33. Adult male Ptychadena porosissima from Lungwebungu
River crossing. Photo by Werner Conradie.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Elevation (m)
ra)
S
S
Map 30. Distribution of Ptychadena oxyrhynchus in Angola.
Habitat and natural history notes: Only found in
open dry savanna. Comments: This species has a wide
distribution, from Senegal to South Africa (Channing
and Roédel 2019). Found across most of Angola (Marques
et al. 2018), associated with a wide variety of habitats.
Smith (1849) gave the type locality as ‘Kaffirland and
the region of Port Natal,’ which is situated along the
east coast of South Africa. Material from Angola differs
molecularly from the topotypical material and warrants
further phylogenetic investigation (Hubler 2015).
Ptychadena porosissima (Steindachner, 1867)
Striped Ridged Frog (Fig. 33; Map 31)
Material (17 = specimens): PEM A12712-6,
Lungwebungu River camp bridge crossing, -12.58347°
18.66600°, 1,304 m asl; PEM A12901—2, PEM A12906,
Quembo River source lake, -13.13624° 19.04591°,
1,366 m asl; PEM A13749-51, Lungwebungu River
Campsite, -12.58319° 18.66573°, 1,284 m asl; PEM
A13782-3, Lungwebungu River Trap 1, -12.58013°
18.66740°, 1,298 m asl; PEM A14708-9, INBAC: WC-
6750, Lungwebungu River camp, -12.58439° 18.66748°,
1,297 m asl; PEM A14782, Quembo River bridge
camp, -13.52746° 19.28060°, 1,241 m asl. Description:
Medium sized Ptychadena; sharp snout; large tympanum,
Elevation (m)
=}
o
Oo
Map 31. Distribution of Ptychadena porosissima in Angola.
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Amphibians of the Okavango Delta headwater area in Angola
almost equal to eye diameter; three phalanges of longest
toe free of webbing; webbing reaches first phalange
of the outer toe; large inner metatarsal tubercle; outer
metatarsal tubercle inconspicuous or absent; distinct inner
tarsal ridge; subarticular tubercles single and prominent.
Dorsum brown, with scattered black spots along ridges;
snout paler than body; vertebral stripe broad; dorsolateral
ridge pale, elevated, and prominent; white anterior bars
on lower jaw; dark facial mask from snout to front of
arms; dorsal pale stripe on tibia; back of thighs with light
spots forming longitudinal lines; ventrum immaculate,
except for scattered faint black blotches between arms.
In males, ventrum covered in small brown asperites:
thumbs and nuptial pads swollen. Adult females (n = 7)
varied from 34.8-46.2 (41.1) mm (largest female: PEM
A12716); adult males (n = 7) varied from 34.9-40.0
(37.4) mm (largest male: PEM A14782). Habitat and
natural history notes: Found in flooded grasslands or
river margins. Comments: Found in sympatry with the
closely related P. uzungwensis, but at lower abundance.
The two species can be distinguished based on ventral
asperites (present in P. porosissima versus absent in P.
uzungwensis), dorsal coloration (striped in P. porosissima
versus mostly spotted in P uzungwensis), and dorsal
tibia line (always present in P. porosissima versus mostly
absent in P. uzungwensis).
Ptychadena subpunctata (Bocage, 1866)
Speckled-bellied Ridged Frog (Map 32)
Material (2 specimens): PEM A14874, Ninda River,
-14.84018° 21.66556°, 1,081 m asl; PEM A14812, Luio
River camp floodplains, -13.19711° 20.22194°, 1,181
m asl. Description: Large robust Ptychadena;, snout
pointed; two phalanges of longest toe free of webbing:
large tympanum; small elevated inner metatarsal tubercle;
outer metatarsal tubercle absent. Dorsum brown, with
large rounded dark brown spots; dorsal ridges pale;
narrow vertebral stripe present; lower jaw barred; white
spot below eye; back of thighs with two continuous black
stripes below vent from knee to knee; white stripe on
dorsal tibia; ventrum finely spotted. In males, the forearms
and thumbs are swollen and nuptial pads are black. Adult
Elevation (m)
Map 32. Distribution of Ptychadena subpunctata in Angola.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
46
males (n = 2) varied from 44.6-61.0 (53.1) mm (largest
male: PEM A14874). Habitat and natural history notes:
Only found at Zambezi River tributaries to the east and
clearly absent from the source lake area. Comments:
Although originally described from Angola, only a few
records are known from the country (Marques et al. 2018).
Ptychadena taenioscelis Laurent, 1954
Small Ridged Frog (Fig. 34; Map 33)
Material (39 specimens, 2 tadpole lots): PEM A12479—
81, Cuanavale River source lake, -13.08537° 18.89098°,
1,360 m asl; PEM A12492, Dala River, near Samanunga
village, -12.93169° 18.81458°, 1,371 m asl; PEM
A12523, Cuiva River source, -12.66825° 18.35282°,
1,407 m asl; PEM A11609, PEM A12562-69, INBAC
(no number x 4), Cuito River source lake, -12.68935°
18.36012°, 1,431 m asl; PEM A12663, Campsite 2 near
old Cuvango Mission, -13.33451° 16.41280°, 1,534
m asl; PEM A12760, INBAC: WC-4750, INBAC (no
number), Cuando River source, -13.00346° 19.12751°,
1,353 m asl; PEM A12767—-8, Cuando River source trap
1, -13.00393° 19.12808°, 1,351 m asl; PEM A12783-4,
INBAC: WC-4600, Quembo River trap 1, -13.13592°
19.04417°, 1,369 m asl; PEM A12837, 31 km W of
Menongue, Cueli River, -14.70511° 17.38014°, 1,392
m asl; PEM A12897-—8, INBAC (no number), Quembo
Fig. 34. Adult female Ptychadena taenioscelis from Cuito
River source. Photo by Werner Conradie.
Elevation (m)
Map 33. Distribution of Ptychadena taenioscelis in Angola.
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Conradie et al.
River source lake, -13.13624° 19.04591°, 1,367 m
asl; PEM A13813, Lake Tchanssengwe, -12.41403°
18.64418°, 1,393 m asl; PEM A13820, en route to
Cuemba Village, -11.96587° 17.76176°, 1,302 m asl;
PEM A14092 (tadpoles), series of pans south of Tempué,
-13.55719° 18.85519°, 1,315 m asl; PEM A14122
(tadpoles), Calua River source, 6 km SE of Curto River
source, -12.73675° 18.39310°, 1,446 m asl; PEM
A14691, Lungwebungu River camp, first oxbow on right
side, -12.58117° 18.67106°, 1,294 m asl; PEM A14813-
6, INBAC: WC-7009, Luio River camp floodplains,
-13.19711° 20.22194°, 1,181 masl. Additional material
(2 specimens, 1 tadpole lot): SAIAB 204572 (2
specimens), Samaununga village, -12.93228° 18.81672°,
1,364 m asl; SAIAB 209102 (12 tadpoles), Calua lagoon,
-12.73599° 18.39394°, 1,448 m asl. Description: Small
Ptychadena; subarticular tubercles weakly developed;
thin inner metatarsal tubercle; outer metatarsal tubercle
absent or much reduced; three phalanges of longest toe
free of webbing. Dorsum dark, with scattered black spots;
broad vertebral band often present; white line above lip,
from tip of snout to insertion of arm; bright green patch
between eye and lip; dorsolateral ridge white; back of
thighs with one continuous black stripe below vent from
knee to knee; soles of feet, toes, forearms, and legs black:
light line present on dorsal tibia; throat with scattered
black spots; ventrum immaculate. Adult females (n =
21) varied from 21.5—33.2 (27.4) mm (largest female:
PEM A12523); adult males (n = 9) varied from 23.1—
28.2 (26.5) mm (largest male: PEM A13813). Habitat
and natural history notes: Found along river margins
and floodplains. Comments: The close morphological
relationship between P. pumilio and P. taenioscelis has
been discussed in the past, and no clear concensus has
yet been reached (Perret 1979; Poynton and Broadley
1987), although the former is mostly restricted to West
Africa and the latter to Southern Africa (Channing and
Rodel 2019). Bittencourt-Silva (2019) alludes to the
close genetic relationship between P. pumilio and this
species. Additional investigation is needed to validate its
taxonomic status.
Fig. 35. Adult male Ptychadena uzungwensis from Culua River
source. Photo by Werner Conradie.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Ptychadena uzungwensis (Loveridge, 1932)
Udzungwa Ridged Frog (Fig. 35; Map 34)
Material (56 specimens, 7 tadpole lots): PEM
A12482-3, Cuanavale River source lake, -13.08537°
18.89098°, 1,360 m asl; PEM A12493, river crossing
before Samanunga village, -12.93169° 18.81458°,
1,363 m asl; PEM A12570—2, Cuito River source lake,
-12.68935° 18.36012°, 1,431 m asl; PEM A12609-11,
PEM A14117 (tadpoles), Calua River source, 6 km SE of
Cuito River source, -12.73675° 18.39310°, 1,445 m asl;
PEM A12641, Cuanavale River, -13.29236° 18.96283°,
1,314 m asl; PEM A12717—8, Lungwebungu River
camp bridge crossing, -12.58347° 18.66598°, 1,304 m
asl; PEM A12761-—3, Cuando River Source, -13.00346°
19.12751°, 1,353 m asl; PEM A12769, Cuando River
source, trap 1, -13.00393° 19.12808°, 1,351 m_ asl;
PEM A12813-4, Cuito River source lake, -12.68727°
18.36067°, 1,424 m asl; PEM A12826, Quembo River,
trap 3, -13.13073° 19.03725°, 1,453 m asl; PEM
A12831-3, Culua River source, -12.73723° 18.39340°,
1,450 m asl; PEM A12838, 31 km W of Menongue,
Cueli River, -14.70511° 17.38014°, 1,392 m asl; PEM
A12899-900, PEM A12903-—5, Quembo River source
lake, -13.13624° 19.04591°, 1,366 m asl; PEM A13752-
5, Lungwebungu River campsite, -12.58319° 18.66573°,
1,284 m asl; PEM A13814, Lake Tchanssengwe,
-12.41403° 18.64418°, 1,393 masl; PEM A13816, John’s
crossing before village, -12.20672° 18.06236°, 1,387
m asl; PEM A14083 (tadpoles), Longa rice paddies,
Longa River, -14.56356° 18.44367°, 1,277 m asl; PEM
A14084 (tadpoles), Cuanavale River source, -13.09033°
18.89396°, 1,359 m asl; PEM A14087 (tadpoles), 4 km
upstream from Cuanavale River source, -13.05084°
18.89726°, 1,380 m asl; PEM A14093, (tadpoles) series
of pans south of Tempué village, -13.55719° 18.85519°,
1,315 m asl; PEM A14095 (tadpoles), Dala River, near
Samanunga village, -12.93169° 18.81458°, 1,363 m
asl; PEM A14100 (tadpoles), 4 km downstream from
Cuanavale River source camp, -13.11585° 18.90246°,
1,354 m asl; PEM A14692, Lungwebungu River camp,
machamba (cultivated areas) on left side of river,
f
Elevation (m)
Map 34. Distribution of Ptychadena uzungwensis in Angola.
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Amphibians of the Okavango Delta headwater area in Angola
-12.58276° 18.66556°, 1,295 m asl; PEM A14695,
Lungwebungu River camp, right bank past first oxbow,
-12.58077° 18.67585°, 1,300 m asl; PEM A14710-11,
Lungwebungu River camp, -12.58439° 18.66748°, 1,297
m asl; PEM A14719, PEM A14738, Quembo River bridge
camp, -13.52746° 19.28060°, 1,241 m asl; PEM A14737,
Quembo River bridge camp, trap 1, -13.52801° 19.28147°,
1,236 m asl; PEM A14760, Quembo River bridge camp,
trap 2, -13.52816° 19.28067°, 1,240 m asl; PEM A14817,
Luio River camp floodplains, -13.19711° 20.22194°,
1,181 m asl; PEM A14875, wetland south of Lake Hundo,
-15.01099° 21.63608°, 1,100 m asl. Additional specimens
(2 specimens): SAIAB 204568 (2 specimens), Quembo
River source lake, -13.13611° 19.04500°, 1,367 m asl.
Description: Medium sized Ptychadena, tympanum large,
three-quarters the size of the eye; small inconspicuous
metatarsal tubercle; large outer metatarsal tubercle; three
phalanges of longest toe free of webbing; numerous
irregular-sized palmar tubercles present; prominent
longitudinal ridges; outer dorsolateral ridge broken
anteriorly; no ventral asperites in males. Dorsum with
scattered blotches, almost forming transverse bands; lower
lip barred; vertebral stripe present or absent; snout distinctly
marked, without pale triangle; back of thighs with large pale
blotches, almost forming longitudinal stripes; light line on
dorsal tibia often absent (present in PEM A12769, 12762,
and 12900). Males with swollen and dark thumbs. Adult
females (n = 25) varied from 27.5—43.7 (39.0) mm (largest
females: PEM A12905, PEM A12831); adult males (n =
22) varied from 30.1—39.5 (35.0) mm (largest male: PEM
A12611). Habitat and natural history notes: Commonly
found in flooded grasslands adjacent to main rivers and
source lakes. Comments: See P. porosissima account for
information on sympatry between these two species.
Pyxicephalidae
Amietia angolensis (Bocage, 1866)
Angola River Frog (Fig. 36; Map 35)
Material (16 specimens): PEM A12627, roadside
ditch 10 km SW of Cuito town, -12.44815° 16.88118°,
wae
Fig. 36. Adult male Amietia angolensis from west of Menongue.
Photo by Werner Conradie.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
1,742 m asl; PEM A12645, confluence of Cuito and
Calua rivers, -12.74878° 18.35433°, 1,413 m asl; PEM
A12653-7, INBAC: WC-5245, Kuvango Hydro Plant
Site, -14.38775° 16.29365°, 1,441 m asl; PEM A12669,
Campsite 1 below rapids, west of Fundo village,
-13.04359° 16.37439°, 1,571 m asl; PEM A12671-3,
INBAC: WC-5228, Camp 3, Malova Village, Mipanha
River, -14.09140° 16.41476°, 1,553 masl; PEM A12834,
31 km W of Menongue, Cueli River, -14.70511°
17.38014°, 1,392 m asl; PEM A13785, Aquaculture farm
outside Cuito, -12.43972° 16.89833°, 1,689 m asl; PEM
A13786, Dam/Hydroplant on Rio Cuquema, -12.42556°
16.81856°, 1,640 m asl; PEM A14678, Villa Menongue,
-14.63015° 17.63465°, 1373 m asl; bridge between
Huambo and Cuito, -12.47056° 16.82389°, 1,643 m asl.
Additional material (2 specimens): SAIAB 204011
(2 specimens), Cuchi River below bridge, -14.70272°
17.37864°, 1,393 m asl. Description: Large species;
large tympanum, with an elevated ridge running from
just behind the eye to arm; elevated paravertebral ridges
continuous from behind eyes to groin, while the other
ridges are broken (except in PEM A12834, where the
dorsum is smooth); two and a half phalanges of longest toe
free of webbing; small but conspicuous inner metatarsal
tubercle; no outer metatarsal tubercle; well-developed
subarticular tubercles; protruding eyes that are contained
in outline of jaw viewed from below. Dorsum brown to
dark green with scattered darker blotches; gular region
dark with irregular white blotches that sometimes fuse
to form lines; light vertebral stripe often present; dorsal
tibia with dark crossbands; ventrum immaculate, except
in two specimens (PEM A12654 and A12657) where
the throat mottling extends onto the groin. In breeding
males, the dorsum is yellowish, spiny with black-tipped
asperites, and the nuptial pads on the thumbs are swollen.
Adult males (n = 13) varied from 51.1—71.9 (63.9) mm
(largest male: PEM A12671). Habitat and natural
history notes: All material was found associated with
the western tributaries of the Cubango River, where
the substrate is rocky and the water is fast flowing. A
single subadult specimen was found at the confluence of
Elevation (m)
3
Oo
So
Map 35. Distribution of Amietia angolensis in Angola.
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Conradie et al.
Fig. 37. Adult male Zomopterna tuberculosa from west of
Cuito town. Photo by Werner Conradie.
the Calua and Cuito rivers. This species is absent from
the rivers and floodplains of the main Okavango River
basin, possibly due to the sandier substrate. Comments:
Recent phylogenetic revisions of the genus led to the
identification and description of numerous cryptic
species (Channing and Baptista 2013; Larson et al. 2016;
Channing et al. 2016). In the process, A. angolensis,
which was once considered to have a wide distribution
across most of southern African, was restricted to Angola
and is now regarded as a country endemic (Channing and
Baptista 2013; Channing et al. 2016).
Tomopterna tuberculosa (Boulenger, 1882)
Rough Sand Frog (Fig. 37; Map 36)
Material (5 specimens): PEM A12632-3, roadside ditch
10 km SW of Cuito, -12.44815° 16.88118°, 1,743 m asl;
PEM A12681, INBAC: WC-5235, Camp 3, Malova
Village, Mipanha River, -14.09140° 16.41476°, 1,553 m
asl; PEM A13792-—3, Dam/Hydroplant on Rio Cuquema,
-12.42556° 16.81856°, 1,640 m asl. Description:
Medium sized frog; short snout; tympanum clearly
visible; elevated ridge from behind eye to arm; reduced
webbing; inner metatarsal tubercle large; subarticular
Fig. 38. Adult male Amnirana adiscifera stat. nov. from Cuando
River source. Photo by James Harvey.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Elevation (m)
S
oO
So
Map 36. Distribution of Zomopterna tuberculosa in Angola.
tubercles single. Dorsum brown with near-symmetrical
dark brown markings with thin white border; dark brown
interorbital bar; no light vertebral line. Adult females
(n = 2) measured 45.4-46.3 (45.8) mm (largest female:
PEM A12681); adult males (n = 4) varied from 31.9-
36.5 (32.3) mm (largest male: PEM A12633). Habitat
and natural history notes: This species was only found
within the western side of the study area, associated with
open and rocky habitats. Comments: This species occurs
mostly in central and western Angola, with isolated
records in the east (Marques et al. 2018). Elsewhere, it
is known from northern Namibia and western Zambia
to northern Tanzania and south to Zimbabwe (Channing
and Rodel 2019).
Ranidae
Amnirana adiscifera (Schmidt and Inger, 1959) stat. nov.
Green White-lipped Frog (Fig. 38; Map 37)
Material (18 specimens, 5 tadpole lots): PEM A11599,
Cuito River source lake, -12.68935° 18.36012°, 1,431
m asl; PEM A12447, Cuanavale River source lake,
-13.08537° 18.89098°, 1,360 m asl; PEM A12726,
Cuando River source, -13.00346° 19.12751°, 1,353 m
Elevation (m)
5
o
Oo
Map 37. Distribution of Amnirana adiscifera stat. nov. in
Angola.
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Amphibians of the Okavango Delta headwater area in Angola
asl; PEM A12727-—8, Cuando River source, -13.00346°
19.12751°, 1,353 m asl; PEM A12764—6, Cuando River
source, trap 1, -13.00393° 19.12808°, 1,351 m asl;
PEM A12791, Cuanavale River source lake camp side,
-13.09442° 18.89370°, 1,368 m asl; PEM A12798-9,
Cuanavale River source lake opposite side, -13.08934°
18.89485°, 1,359 m asl; PEM A12842, west of Cuito
town on Aludungo road, -14.64833° 16.97444°, 1,380 m
asl; PEM A13736 (tadpoles), Comba River, -12.62442°
18.65159°, 1,299 m asl; PEM A13764, Lungwebungu
River old oxbows, -12.58129° 18.67162°, 1,304 m asl:
PEM A14082 (tadpoles), Luissinga River, -14.58899°
18.44367°, 1,311 m asl; PEM A14091 (tadpoles),
Cuanavale River source, -13.09033° 18.89396°, 1,359 m
asl; PEMA14099 (tadpoles), PEM A12485-—7, Dala River,
near Samanga village, -12.93169° 18.81458°, 1,363 m
asl; PEM A14121 (tadpoles), Culua River source, 6 km
SE of Cuito River source, -12.73675° 18.39310°, 1,446
m asl; PEM A14679, Menongue, -14.63015° 17.63465°,
1,373 m asl; PEM A14716, Cuanavale River source lake,
-13.09052° 18.89394°, 1,357 masl. Additional material
(14 specimens, 4 tadpole lots): SAIAB 209135 (5
specimens), Kalilongue Dam _ inflow, -12.44722°
16.82428°, 1,429 m asl; SAIAB 209081 (1 specimen),
swamp near Cuanavale River source, -13.10750°
18.86089°, 1,386 m asl; SAIAB 209080 (tadpoles),
Cuito River source outlet, -12.70455° 18.35203°, 1,430
m asl; SAIAB 209088 (tadpoles), Calua River lagoon,
-12.73599° 18.39394°, 1,448 m asl; SAIAB 209140
(tadpoles), Cuanavale River lake outlet, -13.09414°
18.89612°, 1,357 m asl; SAIAB 204541 (tadpoles),
Cuanavale River source lake below fish fence, -13.09364°
18.89597°, 1,357 m asl; SAIAB 204567 (1 specimen),
Quembo River source lake, -13.13611° 19.04500°, 1,363
m asl; SAIAB 204520 (2 specimens), SAIAB 204531
(1 specimen), SAIAB 204534 (1 specimen), Cuanavale
River source lake, -13.08997° 18.89389°, 1,358 m asl:
SAIAB 204484 (1 specimen), stream outflow about 2.6
km downstream of Cuando River source lake, -13.00317°
19.15153°, 1,333 m asl; SAIAB 204496 (2 specimens),
river at Munhango lagoon, -12.17281° 18.54897°, 1,376
m asl. Description: Large ranid; large tympanum, nearly
equal in size to eye; elevated upper lip ridge from snout
tip to above arm: pair of dorsolateral ridges from eye
to urostyle; some specimens have a small flap or ridge
above the vent; smooth elevated subarticular tubercles
on feet; small indistinct outer metatarsal tubercle, inner
metatarsal tubercle present; pedal webbing formula:
I (1), I w/e (1-2), TT i/e (1-3), TV (2-3), V (1); no
dilated toe tips or terminal discs, no horizontal grooves
present on toe tips; no external vocal sacs. All the adults
collected were green and not the typical golden-brown
coloration as illustrated in Du Preez and Carruthers
(2009). Metamorphs retain dorsal and ventral spots,
which fade during growth. Tadpoles are orange with
black scattered dots. Males with a small nuptial pad on
the thumb and enlarged glands on the upper arm. Adult
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
females (n = 7) varied from 57.0—66.5 (61.6) mm (largest
female: PEM A14716); adult males (n = 6) varied from
46.9-62.4 (55.0) mm (largest male: PEM A12799).
Habitat and natural history notes: Males called in late
afternoons and early evenings, from vegetation on the
edge of open deep waters. Comments: Currently, five
species of Amnirana have been recorded from Angola
(Marques et al. 2018; Baptista et al. 2019): A. albolabris,
A. darlingi, A. lemairei, A. lepus, and A. parkeriana. All
except A. darlingi are forest-associated species, with toes
that are dilated or have discs with horizontal grooves.
The specimens found in our study do not exhibit dilated
toes or terminal discs. Five specimens from Chitau
that were initially referred to as Rana albolabris (see
Schmidt 1936), were later described as Rana albolabris
adiscifera by Schmidt and Inger (1959). Those authors
only compared it to R. albolabris and R. a. lemairei, and
differentiated it based on the condition of the toes (no
dilated tips or discs), webbing (reduced versus extensive)
and foot length (long versus short), respectively. Later,
without much explanation, Laurent (1964) synonymised
it with Rana darlingi |=Amnirana darlingi|, and this was
followed by Poynton (1964) and Perret (1977). Jongsma
et al. (2018) showed that eastern (Malawi) and western
(Angolan) A. darlingi material differ significantly enough
on a molecular level to warrant taxonomic re-evaluation.
However, no taxonomic action has been undertaken
pending more evidence. The type locality of A. darlingi
is ‘Mazo6e and between Umtali [Mutare] and Marandellas
[= Marondera], Mashonaland, Zimbabwe’ and represents
the eastern material of Jongsma et al. (2018). The new
series of specimens is in full morphological agreement
with the description of R. a. adiscifera. However,
no coloration details were provided in the original
description or in Schmidt (1933). The newly collected
material agrees in preserved coloration and morphology
to photos of the holotype (https://collections-zoology.
fieldmuseum.org/catalogue/1848393). The green
Angolan form of A. darlingi is also in agreement with
the green ‘undescribed Hillwood frog’ referred to by
Channing (2001) and Channing and Rodel (2019).
Recently, Ceriaco et al. (2016, 2018) also documented
this green form of A. darlingi from central Angola. Based
on the color differences, together with the typical form
(green versus brown) and the genetic results by Jongsma
et al. (2018), we here formally assign the green western
material to Schmidt and Inger’s (1959) adiscifera
and elevate it to full species, Amnirana adiscifera
stat. nov. This species is widely distributed in central
Angola and northwestern Zambia (see Channing 2001;
Channing et al. 2013; Marques et al. 2018; Channing
and Rodel 2019). Similar distribution patterns
have been observed in Kassinula wittei, Kassina
kuvangensis, as well as the snake Limnophis bicolor
(Conradie et al. 2020a,b; this study). Amnirana can be
divided into two morphotypes: those with short feet,
dilated toes, or terminal discs and extensive webbing
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Conradie et al.
(albolabris, amnicola, asperrima, fonensis, lemairei,
lepus, occidentalis, and parkeriana), and those with
long feet, reduced webbing, and no dilated toes or discs
(adiscifera, darlingi, and galamensis). The former group
is restricted to forests, while the latter prefers flooded
grasslands in savanna (Poynton 1964). However, this
pattern is not mirrored in the phylogenetic analysis,
and indicates that adaptation from savanna to forest has
occurred more than once (Jongsma et al. 2018).
Discussion
The material collected during this study contributes
substantially to the knowledge of Angolan amphibians.
Our findings have increased the number of documented
amphibians for Angola by at least five species, three
of which are potentially new (1.e., Hyperolius aff.
bocagei, Kassinula cf. wittei, and Leptopelis sp.). A large
collection of the green Amnirana ‘darlingi’ allowed us
to reassess the taxonomic status of this material and led
to both the reinstatement of Schmidt and Inger’s (1959)
adiscifera and its elevation to full species as Amnirana
adiscifera stat. nov. The rain frogs (Breviceps sp.)
collected represent the first modern (post civil unrest,
~2002) material for Angola, and allowed us to explore
their taxonomic status, which led to the description of
a new endemic species, Breviceps ombelanonga (see
Nielsen et al. 2020). Furthermore, the Kassinula wittei
specimens represent the first country records, a range
extension of over 500 km, and further allowed us to
revisit the taxonomic relationships of the group relative
to other hyperoliids (Conradie et al. 2020b). Conradie
et al. (2020b) and Nielsen et al. (2020) highlighted the
relevance of these new collections on the national and
continental levels, as well as the necessity for further
studies to document the diversity and distribution of
Angolan biodiversity.
Some of the species recorded here at the headwaters
of the Okavango (e.g., Amnirana adiscifera stat. nov.,
Kassinula wittei, and Kassina kuvangensis) also occur
in northwestern Zambia and eastern DRC (Poynton and
Broadley 1985a,b, 1987, 1988; Channing 2001). Cei
(1977) suggested that the amphibian fauna located south
of the main Congo rivers to the Cubango rivers should
have close affinities, given the lack of natural barriers.
The limited genetic differences between Kassinula wittei
from Angola and DRC (Neéas et al. 2022) provided
support for this hypothesis, and this may also be reflected
in other taxa.
On a more regional level, we increased the number of
amphibian species recorded from the Cuito, Cuanavale,
and Cuando rivers in Angola by Conradie et al. (2016)
by nine species, and documented an additional 42 species
associated with the Angolan Zambezi River basin. Ten of
the species recorded here represent the southeasternmost
records for Angola, some of which are also new records
for the larger Okavango River basin (1.e., Arthroleptis
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
51
stenodactylus, A. xenochirus, Breviceps ombelanonga,
Hyperolius raymondi, Kassinula wittei, Ptychadena
bunoderma, P. keilingi, Leptopelis sp., and Hyperolius
aff. bocagei).
In total, 125 nights, representing 240 total trapping
nights, were spent surveying the region during both wet
and dry seasons, without adding any additional species to
the checklist. Thus, we now consider the upper catchments
of the Cuito, Cuanavale, Cuando, and Lungwebungu
rivers to be well surveyed for amphibians. However, the
following species are expected to occur eastward to the
Zambian border (compare to Broadley 1971; Pietersen et
al. 2017; Bittencourt-Silva 2019), based the availability
of appropriate habitat: Breviceps adspersus, Breviceps
poweri, Chiromantis xerampelina, Hildebrandtia
ornata, Hemisus marmoratus, Phrynomantis bifasciatus,
Phrynomantis affinis, Poyntonophrynus fenoulheti,
Poyntonophrynus kavangensis, Ptychadena mapacha,
Pyxicephalus adspersus, and Tomopterna cryptotis.
The headwaters of the Okavango River basin, with
peat lakes and extensive floodplains, harbor a high
diversity of Hyperoliidae (three genera, comprising 12
species) and Ptychadenidae (nine species), compared
to the more terrestrial families such as Bufonidae.
Many of the species are regarded as local endemics to
the headwaters (1.e., Hyperolius raymondi, Hyperolius
aff. bocagei, Kassina kuvangensis, Kassinula_ wittei,
and Ptychadena keilingi). The increased knowledge
coupled with the presence of habitat specialist species
will contribute to better conservation planning in these
regions and the larger Okavango River basin.
Acknowledgments.—We thank the Wild Bird
Trust, which administers the National Geographic
Okavango Wilderness Project (2016-2019 National
Geographic Society grant). Material was collected and
exported under the following export permits issued
by the Angolan Ministry of Environment Institute of
Biodiversity (MINAMB): 31/GGPCC/2016, 89/INBAC.
MINAMB/2017, 002/GGPTBOK/18, and 151/INBAC/
MINAMB/2019. Ethical clearance for this study was
obtained from the Port Elizabeth Museum (Bayworld)
ethics committee (Ethical Clearance no. 2013 and
2017-2). We would also like to acknowledge the use
of infrastructure and equipment provided by the NRF-
SAIAB Aquatic Genomics Research Platform, and the
funding channeled through the NRF-SAIAB Institutional
Support System for generating barcodes. This project is
endorsed and supported by the Governors of Cuando
Cubango, Bié and Moxico provinces. Various colleagues
are thanked for collecting herpetological material during
their fieldwork, including Alexander Rebelo, Timdteo
Julio, Gotz Neef, Roger Bills, Paul Skelton, Maans
Booysens, and Kerllen Costa. WC thanks the Eastern
Cape Province Department of Sport, Recreation, Arts,
and Culture (DSRAC) and Port Elizabeth Museum
(Bayworld) for granting special leave to take part in
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Amphibians of the Okavango Delta headwater area in Angola
these surveys. We thank Enviro-Insight for constructing
and donating the drift fences required for the trapping
exercise. NLB is currently supported by BIOPOLIS
2022-19.
Literature Cited
Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ.
1990. Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of
Molecular Biology 215: 403-410.
Angel MF. 1924. Note préliminaire sur deaux batraciens
nouveaux, des genres Rappia et Bufo, provenant
d’Afrique orientale anglaise (Mission Alluaud et
Jeannel, 1911-1912). Bulletin du Muséum National
d Histoire Naturelle. Paris 30: 269-270.
Baptista N, Conradie W, Vaz Pinto P, Branch WR.
2019. The amphibians of Angola: early studies
and the current state of knowledge. Pp 243-281 In:
Biodiversity of Angola. Science and Conservation: a
Modern Synthesis. Editors, Huntley BJ, Ferrand N,
Russo V, Lages F. Springer, Cham, Switzerland. 552
p.
Baptista NL, Vaz Pinto P, Keates C, Edwards S, Rodel
M-O, Conradie W. 2021. A new species of red
toad, Schismaderma Smith, 1849 (Anura: Bufonidae),
from central Angola. Zootaxa 5081(3): 301-332.
Becker FS, Vaz Pinto P, Baptista N, Ernst R, Conradie
W. 2023. The amphibians of the highlands and
escarpments of Angola and Namibia. Namibian
Journal of Environment (In Press).
Benson DA, Cavanaugh M, Clark K, Karsch-Mizrachi
I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Sayers EW. 2013. GenBank.
Nucleic Acids Research 41(D1): D36—D42.
Bittencourt-Silva GB. 2019. Herpetological survey of
western Zambia. Amphibian & Reptile Conservation
13(2) [Special Section]: 1-28 (e181).
Bittencourt-Silva GB, Bayliss J, Conradie W. 2020.
First herpetological surveys of Mount Lico and
Mount Socone, Mozambique. Amphibian & Reptile
Conservation 14(2) [General Section]: 198-217
(e247).
Bocage JVB. 1895. Herpétologie d’Angola et du Congo.
Imprimerie Nationale, Lisbonne, France. 203 p.
Branch WR, Schmitz A, Lobon-Rovira J, Baptista NL,
Antonio T, Conradie W. 2021. Rock island melody:
a revision of the Afroedura bogerti Loveridge, 1944
group, with descriptions of four new endemic species
from Angola. Zoosystematics and Evolution 97(1):
55-82.
Branch WR, Baptista N, Vaz Pinto P, Conradie W. 2019a.
The reptiles of Angola — history, updated checklists,
endemism, hot spots, and future directions for research.
Pp. 283-326 In: Biodiversity of Angola. Science and
Conservation: a Modern Synthesis. Editors, Huntley
BJ, Ferrand N, Russo V, Lages F. Springer, Cham,
Switzerland. 552 p.
Branch WR, Conradie W, Vaz Pinto P, Tolley KA.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
52
2019b. Another Angolan Namib endemic species:
a new Nucras Gray, 1838 (Squamata: Lacertidae)
from south-western Angola. Amphibian & Reptile
Conservation 13(2) [Special Section]: 82—95 (e199).
Broadley DG. 1971. The reptiles and amphibians of
Zambia. The Puku: the Occasional Papers of the
Deptartmetn of Wildlife, Fisheries, and National
Parks, Zambia 6: 1-143.
Brooks C. 2012. Biodiversity Survey of the Upper
Angolan Catchment of the Cubango-Okavango
River Basin. USAid-Southern Africa, Pretoria,
South Africa. 151 p. Available: http://the-eis.com/
elibrary/sites/default/files/downloads/literature/
Combined%20Angolan%20Biodiversity%20
Survey%20Report_ 2012 08 05 14.pdf [Accessed: 3
April 2023].
Brooks C. 2013. Trip Report: Aquatic Biodiversity
Survey of the Lower Cuito and Cuando River Systems
in Angola. USAid-Southern Africa, Pretoria, South
Africa. 43 p. Available: http://the-eis.com/elibrary/
sites/default/files/downloads/literature/A quatic%20
biodiversity%20survey%200f%20the%20lower%20
Cuito%20and%20Cuando%20river%20systems%20
in%20Angola_2013.pdf [Accessed: 3 April 2023].
Cei JM. 1977. Chaves para uma identificacao preliminar
dos batraquios anuros da R.P. de Angola. Boletim da
Sociedade Portuguesa de Ciéncias Naturais 17: 5—26.
Ceriaco LMP, Agarwal I, Marques MP, Bauer AM.
2020a. A review of the genus Hemidactylus Goldfuss,
1820 (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from Angola, with the
description of two new species. Zootaxa 4746(1):
1-71.
Ceriaco LMP, Heinicke MP, Parker KL, Marques MP,
Bauer AM. 2020b. A review of the African Snake-
eyed Skinks (Scincidae: Panaspis) from Angola, with
the description of a new species. Zootaxa 4747(1):
77-112.
Ceriaco LMP, Agarwal I, Marques MP, Bauer AM.
2020c. A correction to a recent review of the
genus Hemidactylus Goldfuss, 1820 (Squamata:
Gekkonidae) from Angola, with the description of two
additional species. Zootaxa 4861(1): 92-106.
Ceriaco LMP, Marques MP, Bandeira S, Agarwal I,
Stanley EL, Bauer AM, Heinicke MP, Blackburn
DC. 2018. A new earless species of Poyntonophrynus
(Anura, Bufonidae) from the Serra da Neve Inselberg,
Namibe Province, Angola. ZooKeys 780: 109-136.
Ceriaco LMP, Marques MP, Bandeira SA. 2016. Anfibios
e Répteis do Parque Nacional da Cangandala.
Instituto Nacional da Biodiversidade e Areas de
Conservacao and Museu Nacional de Historia Natural
e da Ciéncia, Lisbon, Portugal. 96 p.
Ceriaco LMP, Santos BS, Marques MP, Bauer AM,
Tiutenko A. 2021. Citizen science meets specimens
in old formalin filled jars: a new species of Banded
Rubber Frog, genus Phrynomantis (Anura:
Microhylidae) from Angola. A/ytes 38(1-4): 18-48.
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Conradie et al.
Channing A. 2022. Color patterns to sequences:
a perspective on the systematics of the
Hyperolius viridiflavus group (Anura: Hyperoliidae)
using mitochondrial DNA. Zootaxa 5134: 301-354.
Channing A. 2001. Amphibians of Central and Southern
Africa. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York,
USA. 470 p.
Channing A, R6del MO, Channing J. 2012. Tadpoles
of Africa. Edition Chimaira, Frankfurt am Main,
Germany. 402 p.
Channing A, Baptista N. 2013. Amietia angolensis and A.
Juscigula (Anura: Pyxicephalidae) in southern Africa:
a cold case reheated. Zootaxa 3640: 501-520.
Channing A, Dehling JM, Lotters S, Ernst R. 2016.
Species boundaries and taxonomy of the African river
frogs (Amphibia: Pyxicephalidae: Amietia). Zootaxa
4155(1): 1-76.
Channing A, Hillers A, Lotters S, Rodel MO, Schick
S, Conradie W, Ré6dder R, Mercurio V, Wagner P,
Dehling MJ, et al. 2013. Taxonomy of the super-
cryptic Hyperolius nasutus group of Long Reed Frogs
of Africa (Anura: Hyperoltidae), with descriptions of
Six hew species. Zootaxa 3620(3): 301-350.
Channing A, Rodel M-O. 2019. Field Guide to the Frogs
and Other Amphibians of Africa. Struik Nature, Cape
Town, South Africa. 408 p.
Conradie W, Baptista NL, Verburgt L, Keates C,
Harvey J, Julio T, Neef G. 2021. Contributions to
the herpetofauna of the Angolan Okavango-Cuando-
Zambezi river drainages. Part 1: Serpentes (snakes).
Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 15(2) [General
Section]: 244-278 (e292).
Conradie W, Branch WR, Measey GJ, Tolley KA. 201 2a.
Revised phylogeny of Sand Lizards (Pedioplanis)
and the description of two new species from south-
western Angola. African Journal of Herpetology
60(2): 91-112.
Conradie W, Branch WR, Measey JG, Tolley, KA. 201 2b.
A new species of Hyperolius Rapp, 1842 (Anura:
Hyperoliidae) from the Serra da Chela mountains,
southwestern Angola. Zootaxa 3269: 1-17.
Conradie W, Deepak V, Keates C, Gower DJ. 2020a.
Kissing cousins: a review of the African genus
Limnophis Gunther, 1865 (Colubridae: Natricinae),
with the description of a new species from north-
eastern Angola. African Journal of Herpetology
69(1): 79-107.
Conradie W, Keates C, Lobon-Rovira J, Vaz Pinto P,
Verburgt L, Baptista NL, Harvey J, Julio T. 2020b. New
insights into the taxonomic status, distribution, and
natural history of De Witte’s Clicking Frog (Kassinula
wittei Laurent, 1940). African Zoology 55(4): 311-
B22.
Conradie W, Keates C, Baptista NL, Lobon-Rovira
J. 2022a. Taxonomical review of Prosymna
angolensis Boulenger, 1915 (Elapoidea, Prosymnidae)
with the description of two new species. ZooKeys
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
1121: 97-143.
Conradie W, Schmitz A, Lobén-Rovira J, Becker FS,
Vaz Pinto P, Hauptfleisch ML. 2022b. Rock island
melody remastered: two new species in the Afroedura
bogerti Loveridge, 1944 group from Angola and
Namibia. Zoosystematics and Evolution 98(2): 435—
453.
Conradie W, Branch WR, Tolley KA. 2013. Fifty Shades
of Grey: giving color to the poorly known Angolan
Ash Reed Frog (Hyperoliidae: Hyperolius cinereus),
with the description on a new species. Zootaxa
3635(3): 201-223.
Conradie W, Keates C, Verburgt L, Baptista NL, Harvey
J, Julio T, Neef G. 2022c. Contributions to the
herpetofauna of the Angolan Okavango-Cuando-
Zambezi River drainages. Part 2: Lizards (Sauria),
chelonians, and crocodiles. Amphibian & Reptile
Conservation 16(2) [General Section]: 181-214
(e322).
Conradie W, Bills R. 2017. Wannabe ranid: notes on the
morphology and natural history of the Lemaire’s Toad
(Bufonidae: Sclerophrys lemairii). Salamandra 53(3):
439-444.
Conradie W, Bill R, Branch WR. 2016. The herpetofauna
of the Cubango, Cuito, and lower Cuando river
catchments of south-eastern Angola. Amphibian &
Reptile Conservation 10(2) [Special Section]: 6-36
(e126).
Du Preez L, Carruthers V. 2017. Frogs of Southern
Africa: a Complete Guide. Struik Publishers, Cape
Town, South Africa. 520 p.
Ernst R, Lautenschlager T, Branquima MF, Holting M.
2020. At the edge of extinction: a first herpetological
assessment of the proposed Serra do Pingano
Rainforest National Park in Uige Province, northern
Angola. Zoosystematics and Evolution 96: 237-262.
Ernst R, Nienguesso ABT, Lautenschlager T, Bare} MF,
Schmitz A, Holting M. 2014. Relicts of a forested
past: southernmost distribution of the Hairy Frog
genus Trichobatrachus Boulenger, 1900 (Anura:
Arthroleptidae) in the Serra do Pingano region of
Angola with comments on its taxonomic status.
Zootaxa 3779(2): 297-300.
Ernst R, Schmitz A, Wagner P, Branquima MF, Holting
M. 2015. A window to Central African forest history:
distribution of the Xenopus fraseri subgroup south
of the Congo Basin, including a first country record
of Xenopus andrei from Angola. Salamandra 52(1):
147-155.
Frost R. 2023. Amphibian Species of the World: an
Online Reference. Version 6.1, American Museum of
Natural History, New York, USA. Available: https://
amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org/index. php
[Accessed: 3 April 2023].
Furman BL, Bewick AJ, Harrison TL, Greenbaum E,
Gvozdik V, Kusamba C, Evans BJ. 2015. Pan-African
phylogeography of a model organism, the African
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Amphibians of the Okavango Delta headwater area in Angola
Clawed Frog Xenopus laevis. Molecolur Ecology
24(4): 909-925.
Hallermann J, Ceriaco LMP, Schmitz A, Ernst R,
Conradie W, Verburgt L, Marques MP, Bauer AM.
2020. A review of the Angolan House Snakes, genus
Boaedon Dumeéril, Bibron, and Dumeéril (1854)
(Serpentes: Lamprophiidae), with description of three
new species in the Boaedon fuliginosus (Boie, 1827)
species complex. African Journal of Herpetology
69(1): 29-78.
Hubler N. 2015. Diversity and phylogeopraphy of
Ridged Frogs (Anura: Ptychadena) in Northern
Angola: morphological and molecular evidence.
Master’s thesis, University of Greifswald, Greifswald,
Germany.
Jongsma GFM, Barej) ME, Barratt CD, Burger
M, Conradie W, Ernst R, Greenbaum E, Hirschfeld
M, Leaché AD, Penner J, et al. 2018. Diversity and
biogeography of frogs in the genus Amnirana (Anura:
Ranidae) across sub-Saharan Africa. Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution 120: 274-285.
Larson TR, Castro D, Behangana M, Greenbaum
E. 2016. Evolutionary history of the river frog
genus Amietia (Anura: Pyxicephalidae) reveals
extensive diversification in Central African highlands.
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 99: 168-181.
Laurent RF. 1972. Tentative revision of the genus Hemisus.
Annales du Musée Royal de |’Afrique Centrale. Série
in Octavo, Science Zoologique, Tervuren 194: 1-67.
Laurent RF. 1964. Reptiles et amphibiens de I’Angola
(troisieme contribution). Publicagées Culturais da
Companhia de Diamantes de Angola 67: 11-165.
Lobon-Rovira J, Conradie W, Baptista NL, Vaz Pinto
P. 2022. A new species of Feather-tailed Leaf-toed
Gecko, Kolekanos Heinicke, Daza, Greenbaum,
Jackman, and Bauer, 2014 (Squamata, Gekkonidae)
from the poorly explored savannah of western Angola.
ZooKeys 1127: 91-116.
Lobon-Rovira J, Conradie W, Buckley Iglesias D, Ernst R,
Verisimmo L, Baptista N, Vaz Pinto P. 2021. Between
sand, rocks, and branches: an integrative taxonomic
revision of Angolan Hemidactylus Goldfuss, 1820,
with description of four new species. Vertebrate
Zoology 71: 465-501.
Loveridge A. 1953. Zoological results ofa fifth expedition
to East Africa. 1V. Amphibians from Nyasaland and
Tete. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology
110: 325-406.
Marques MP, Parrinha D, Santo BS, Bandeira S, Butler
BO, Sousa CAN, Bauer AM, Wagner P. 2022a.
All in all it’s just another branch in the tree: a new
species of Acanthocercus Fitzinger, 1843 (Squamata:
Agamidae), from Angola. Zootaxa 5099(2): 221-243.
Marques MP, Ceriaco LMP, Heinicke MP, Chehouri RM,
Conradie W, Tolley KA, Bauer A. 2022b. The Angolan
Bushveld Lizards, genus Heliobolus Fitzinger, 1843
(Squamata: Lacertidae): integrative taxonomy and the
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
54
description of two new species. Vertebrate Zoology
72: 745-769.
Marques MP, Parrhina D, Ceriaco LMP, Brennan IG,
Heinicke MP, Bauer AM. 2023. A new species of
thick-toed gecko (Pachydactylus) from Serra da Neve
and surrounding rocky areas of southwestern Angola.
Vertebrate Zoology 73: 325-343.
Marques MP, Ceriaco LMP, Bandeira S, Pauwels OSG,
Bauer AM. 2019a. Description of a new Long-tailed
Skink (Scincidae: Trachylepis) from Angola and the
Democratic Republic of the Congo. Zootaxa 4568 (1):
51-68.
Marques MP, Ceriaco LMP, Blackburn DC, Bauer AM.
2018. Diversity and distribution of the amphibians
and terrestrial reptiles of Angola: atlas of historical
and bibliographic records (1840-2017). Proceedings
of the California Academy of Sciences Series 4
65(Supplement IT): 1-501.
Marques MP, Ceriaco LMP, Buehler MD, Bandeira
SA, Janota JM, Bauer AM. 2020. A revision of the
Dwarf Geckos, genus Lygodactylus (Squamata:
Gekkonidae), from Angola, with the description of
three new species. Zootaxa 4853(3): 301-352.
Marques MP, Ceriaco LMP, Stanley EL, Bandeira SA,
Agarwal I, Bauer AM. 2019b. A new species of
Girdled Lizard (Squamata: Cordylidae) from the Serra
da Neve Inselberg, Namibe Province, southwestern
Angola. Zootaxa 4668(4): 503-524.
Mertens R. 1938. Amphibien und Reptilien aus Angola
gesmmelt von W. Shack. Senckenbergiana 20(6):
425-443,
Monard A. 1937. Contribution a la batrachologie
d’Angola. Bulletin de la Société Neuchételoise des
Sciences Naturelles 62: 5—59.
National Geographic Okavango Wilderness Project.
2017. Initial Findings from Exploration of the Upper
Catchments of the Cuito, Cuanavale, and Cuando
Rivers, May 2015 to December 2016. Wild Bird Trust,
Johannesburg, South Africa. Available: http://www.
wildbirdtrust.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/
NGOWP._report_1 FOR PRINT_V14_ English. pdf
[Accessed: 3 April 2023].
Ne€as T, Kielgast J, Nagy ZT, Chifundera ZK, Gvozdik
V. 2022. Systematic position of the Clicking Frog
(Kassinula Laurent, 1940), the problem of chimeric
sequences, and the revised classification of the
family Hyperoliidae. Molecular Phylogenetics and
Evolution 174: 1-11 (107514).
Nielsen SV, Conradie W, Ceriaco LMP, Bauer AM,
Heinicke MP, Stanley EL, Blackburn DC. 2020. A
new species of Rain Frog (Brevicipitidae, Breviceps)
endemic to Angola. ZooKeys 979: 133-160.
Parrinha D, Marques MP, Heinicke MP, Khalid F, Parker
KL, Tolley KA, Childers JL, Conradie W, Bauer
AM, Ceriaco LMP. 2021. A revision of Angolan
species in the genus Pedioplanis Fitzinger (Squamata:
Lacertidae), with the description of a new species.
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Conradie et al.
Zootaxa 5032(1): 146.
Perret JL. 1977. Les Hylarana (Amphibiens, Ranidés) du
Cameroun. Revue Suisse de Zoologie 84: 841-868.
Perret JL. 1979. Remarques et mise au point sur quelques
especes de Ptychadena (Amphibia, Ranidae). Bulletin
de la Société des Sciences Naturelles de Neuchdtel
102: 5-21.
Pickersgill M. 2007. Frog Search. Results of Expeditions
to Southern and Eastern Africa from 1993-1999.
Frankfurt Contributions to Natural History 28. Edition
Chimaira, Frankfurt, Germany. 574 p.
Pietersen DW, Pietersen EW, Conradie W. 2017.
Preliminary herpetological survey of the Ngonye Falls
and surrounding regions in south-western Zambia.
Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 11(1) [Special
Section]: 24—43 (e148).
Poynton JC. 1964. The Amphibia of Southern Africa: a
faunal study. Annals of the Natal Museum 17: 1-334.
Poynton JC, Broadley DG. 1985a. Amphibia Zambesiaca
1. Scolecomorphidae, Pipidae, Microhylidae,
Hemisidae, Arthroleptidae. Annals of the Natal
Museum 26(2): 503-553.
Poynton JC, Broadley DG. 1985b. Amphibia Zambesiaca
2. Ranidae. Annals of the Natal Museum 27(1): 115—
181.
Poynton JC, Broadley DG. 1987. Amphibia Zambesiaca
3. Rhacophoridae and Hyperoliidae. Annals of the
Natal Museum 28(1): 161-229.
Poynton JC, Broadley DG. 1988. Amphibia Zambesiaca
4. Bufonidae. Annals of the Natal Museum 29(2):
447-490.
Poynton JC, Broadley DG. 1988. Amphibia Zambesiaca
5. Zoogeography. Annals of the Natal Museum 32(1):
221-277.
Poynton JC, Loader SP, Conradie W, Rodel M-O,
Liedtke C. 2016. Designation and description of a
neotype of Sclerophrys maculata (Hallowell, 1854),
and reinstatement of S. pusilla (Mertens, 1937)
(Amphibia: Anura: Bufonidae). Zootaxa 4089: 73-94.
Roédel M-O. 2000. Herpetofauna of West Africa, Volume
I; Amphibians of the West African Savanna. Edition
Chimaira, Frankfurt, Germany. 322 p.
Ruas C. 1996. Contribui¢ao para o conhecimento da fauna
de batraquios de Angola Parte I: Familias Pipidae,
Bufonidae, Microhylidae, Ranidae, Hemisidae e
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Arthleptidae. Garcia de Orta. Series Zoology (Lisboa)
21(1): 19-41.
Ruas C. 2002. Batraquios de Angola em colec¢ao no
Centro de Zoologia. Garcia de Orta. Series Zoology
(Lisboa) 24(1—2): 139-146.
Schiotz A. 1999. Treefrogs of Africa. Editions Chimaira,
Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 350 p.
Schmidt KP. 1936. The amphibians of the Pulitzer-
Angola Expedition. Annals of Carengie Museum 25:
127-133.
Schmidt KP, Inger RF. 1959. Amphibians exclusive of
the genera Afrixalus and Hyperolius. Exploration du
Parc National de I’ Upemba. Mission G.F- de Witte, en
collaboration avec W. Adam, A. Janssens, L. van Meel
et R. Verheyen (1946-1949) 56: 1-264.
Smith A. 1849. ///ustrations of the Zoology of South
Africa; Consisting Chiefly of Figures and Descriptions
of the Objects of Natural History Collected during an
Expedition into the Interior of South Africa, in the
Years 1834, 1835, and 1836. Volume III. Reptilia,
Part 28. Smith, Elder, and Company, London, United
Kingdom. 94 p.
Stanley EL, Ceriaco LMP, Bandeira S, Valerio H,
Bates MF, Branch WR. 2016. A review of Cordylus
machadoi (Squamata: Cordylidae) in southwestern
Angola, with the description of a new species from
the Pro-Namib desert. Zootaxa 4061(3): 201-226.
Telford N, Alexander GJ, Becker FS, Conradie W, Jordaan
A, Kemp L, Le Grange A, Rebelo AR, Strauss S, Taft
JM, et al. 2022. Extensions to the known geographic
distributions of reptiles in the Karoo, South Africa.
Herpetological Conservation and Biology 17(1):
145-154.
Wagner P, Butler BO, Ceriaco LM, Bauer AM. 2021. A
new species of the Acanthocercus atricollis (Smith,
1849) complex (Squamata, Agamidae). Salamandra
57: 449-463.
Zimkus BM, Schick S. 2010. Light at the end of the
tunnel: insights into the molecular systematics of East
African Puddle Frogs (Anura: Phrynobatrachidae).
Systematics and Biodiversity 8: 39-47.
Zimkus BM, Rodel MO, Hillers A. 2010. Complex
patterns of continental speciation: molecular
phylogenetics and biogeography of sub-Saharan
Puddle Frogs (Phrynobatrachus). Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution 55(3): 883—900.
August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Amphibians of the Okavango Delta headwater area in Angola
Werner Conradie has a Masters in Environmental Science (M.Env.Sc.) and 18 years of
experience working with the southern African herpetofauna. His main research interests focus
on the taxonomy, conservation, and ecology of amphibians and reptiles. Werner has published
numerous principal and collaborative scientific papers, and has served on many conservation and
scientific panels, including the Southern African Reptile and Amphibian Relisting Committees.
He has undertaken research expeditions to many African countries, including Angola, Botswana,
Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. Werner is
currently the Curator of Herpetology at the Port Elizabeth Museum (Bayworld), South Africa.
Chad Keates is currently a Post-doctoral Fellow at the Port Elizabeth Museum, funded by
research funds through Nelson Mandela University (Port Elizabeth, South Africa). Having
recently completed his Ph.D. in Zoology, Chad’s research focuses on the African herpetofauna
and its evolutionary and ecological structuring. In Chad’s short professional career, he has
published several principal and collaborative peer-reviewed scientific papers and book chapters.
As a strong advocate for reptile and amphibian awareness, Chad regularly conducts walks, talks,
and presentations; and he has produced numerous popular scientific outputs on the subject. He
has undertaken numerous expeditions in various African countries, such as Angola, Zambia, and
South Africa, with a variety of both professional and scientific organizations.
Luke Verbursgt is a consulting herpetologist in South Africa with over 19 years of herpetofauna
survey experience across 23 African countries (Angola, Botswana, Cameroon, Democratic
Republic of Congo, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Namibia, Madagascar,
Malawi, Mali, Morocco, Mozambique, Republic of Guinea, SAo Tomé and Principe, Sierra
Leone, South Africa, Swaziland, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zimbabwe). He is a co-owner of
Enviro-Insight (Pretoria, South Africa), holds an M.Sc. in Zoology from the University of
Pretoria, and is a registered scientific professional with the South African Council for Natural
Scientific Professions (SACNASP). Luke has published more than 30 scientific articles, which
include the descriptions of several new African herpetofauna species, and he is a co-author of
the book Snakes and other Reptiles of Zambia and Malawi (Struik Random House Publishers,
Cape Town, South Africa). He is also an extraordinary lecturer in the Department of Zoology &
Entomology at the University of Pretoria.
Ninda Baptista is an Angolan biologist with an M.Sc. degree in Conservation Biology from
the University of Lisbon (Portugal). She is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in Biodiversity, Genetics,
and Evolution at the University of Porto (Portugal) that addresses the diversity of Angolan
amphibians. Over the last 13 years, she has worked on research, in-situ conservation projects,
and environmental consulting in Angola, including priority areas for conservation along the
Angolan escarpment and highlands. She has conducted herpetological surveys throughout the
country, and created a herpetological collection (Coleccaéo Herpetologica do Lubango) that is
currently deposited in Instituto Superior de Ciéncias da Educacado da Huila (ISCED — Huila) in
Angola. Ninda is an author of various scientific papers and book chapters on Angolan herpetology
and ornithology. She also works on scientific outreach, producing magazine articles, books for
children, and posters about the country’s biodiversity in collaboration with Fundagéo Kissama
(Luanda, Angola).
James Harvey lives in South Africa and works as an independent herpetologist, ecological
researcher, and consultant. He holds degrees in Zoology, Hydrology, and Environmental
Management, and has performed herpetological fieldwork widely, primarily within Africa, in
such places as South Africa, Botswana, Zimbabwe, Angola, Malawi, Kenya, Mali, Democratic
Republic of Congo, Madagascar, and Vietnam. His interests are diverse but center on the
taxonomy, ecology, and conservation of herpetofauna and other biodiversity. James has
contributed to conservation assessments, workshops, and Red Data publications for reptiles,
amphibians, mammals, and plants for the southern and eastern African regions. James regularly
attends herpetological conferences, has published several scientific papers, and has contributed
to a number of herpetological publications as an author.
56 August 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e325
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
endemic to the southern island of Isla Todos Santos, BC [Baja California]” (Grismer, 2002: 281). This individual was found on
Isla Todos Santos Sur, Baja California, in the municipality of Ensenada. Isla Todos Santos Sur is one of a pair of islands lying just
over 19 km off the coast of Ensenada in northern Baja California. Grismer (2002: 281) indicated that this snake “appears to be
restricted to the rocky interior area of Isla Sur” and that it feeds on the lizards Sceloporus occidentalis and Plestiodon skiltonianus.
Some authors have considered this kingsnake as a subspecies of Lampropeltis zonata (e.g., Heimes 2016), but our position on the
validity of subspecies (see Materials and Methods) supports our recognition of this snake as a distinct species, a position that is
also recognized by Grismer (2002) and on the Mesoamerican Herpetology website (http://www.mesoamericanherpetology.com;
accessed 11 February 2023). Wilson et al. (2013a) calculated the EVS of this snake as 20, placing it in the highest vulnerability
category. The IUCN does not recognize the taxonomy of this snake, and SEMARNAT considers it as Threatened (A). Photo by
Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
Official journal website:
amphibian-reptile-conservation.org
Amphibian & Reptile Conservation
17(1 & 2) [General Section]: 57-142 (e326).
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula and its
adjacent islands, Mexico: composition, distribution, and
conservation status
‘Anny Peralta-Garcia, ‘Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio, 7Lydia Allison Fucsko,
3Bradford D. Hollingsworth, *Jerry D. Johnson, ‘Vicente Mata-Silva, Arturo Rocha,
5Dominic L. DeSantis, ‘Louis W. Porras, and ’*Larry David Wilson
'Conservacion de Fauna del Noroeste, A.C., Ensenada, Baja California 22897, MEXICO *Department of Humanities and Social Sciences,
Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, AUSTRALIA *Department of Herpetology, San Diego Natural History Museum,
San Diego, California, 92101, USA *Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79968-0500, USA
*Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences, Georgia College & State University, Milledgeville, Georgia 31061, USA °7705 Wyatt Earp
Avenue, Eagle Mountain, Utah 84005, USA ‘Centro Zamorano de Biodiversidad, Escuela Agricola Panamericana Zamorano, Departamento de
Francisco Morazdn, HONDURAS °1350 Pelican Court, Homestead, Florida 33035-1031, USA
Abstract.—The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico, consists of 172 species, including 18
anurans, three salamanders, 140 squamates, and 11 turtles. Among the 10 recognized geographic regions,
the total number of herpetofaunal species ranges from a low of 27 in the Baja California Coniferous Forest
Region to 84 in the Gulf Islands Region. The individual species occupy from one to 10 regions (xX = 3.3). The
Gulf Islands Region is of the greatest significant conservation importance, inasmuch as it contains the largest
overall number of species (84), the largest number of single-region species (39), and the greatest number of
peninsular endemics (50). Asimilarity dendrogram based on the Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic
Averages (UPGMA) indicates that the two most closely related regions are the Central Gulf Coast Region
and the Arid Tropical Region, while the most distantly related region is the Baja California Coniferous Forest
Region. Among the distributional categories, the greatest number of species are the non-endemics (81 of 172,
or 47.1%), followed by the peninsular endemics (77, 44.8%), and finally, the non-natives (14, 8.1%). The principal
environmental threats to the herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula are land conversion and habitat loss,
water diversion and overuse, invasive species, livestock grazing, illegal trade, off-road activities, infectious
diseases, and climate change. We assessed the conservation status of the native species by employing the
SEMARNAT, IUCN, and EVS systems. Of the 158 native species, 85 are included in NOM-059-SEMARNAT, 15
are in the IUCN Threatened categories, and 76 have high EVS values. Two Relative Herpetofaunal Priority
(RHP) methods were used to identify the rank order significance of the 10 geographic regions, and the highest
ranks for both methods were obtained for the Gulf Islands Region. Thirty protected areas are located in the
Baja California Peninsula, and they comprise almost one-half of the total area. All but eight of the 158 native
herpetofaunal species are represented within the system of protected areas. Few herpetofaunal surveys of the
protected areas have been completed thus far, so this is a major conservation goal for the future.
Keywords: Anurans, caudates, conservation status, physiographic regions, protected areas, protection recom-
mendations, squamates, turtles
Resumen.—La herpetofauna de la Peninsula de Baja California, México, consta de 172 especies, incluyendo
18 anuros, tres salamandras, 140 escamosos y 11 tortugas. Entre las 10 regiones geograficas reconocidas, el
numero total de especies de herpetofauna varia desde un minimo de 27 en la Region del Bosque de Coniferas
de Baja California hasta 84 en la Region de las Islas del Golfo. Las especies individuales ocupan de una a
10 regiones (xX = 3.3). La Region de las Islas del Golfo es de gran importancia para la conservacion, ya que
contiene el mayor numero total de especies (84), el mayor numero de especies de una sola region (39) y el
mayor numero de endémicas peninsulares (50). Un dendrograma de similitud basado en el método de grupos
de pares no ponderados con promedios aritmeticos (UPGMA) indica que las dos regiones mas estrechamente
relacionadas son la Region de la Costa Central del Golfo y la Region Tropical Arida. La region mas lejanamente
relacionada es la Region del Bosque de Coniferas de Baja California. Entre las categorias de distribucion el
mayor numero de especies son las no endemicas (81 de 172 0 47.1%), seguidas de las endémicas peninsulares
(77 0 44.8%) y, por ultimo, las no nativas (14 0 8.1%). Las principales amenazas ambientales para la herpetofauna
de la peninsula de Baja California son la conversion de tierras y la perdida de habitat, el desvio y uso excesivo
Correspondence. = annyperalta@faunadelnoroeste.org (APG), jh valdez@yahoo.com.mx (JHVV), lyvdiafucsko@gmail.com (LAF),
bhollingsworth@sdnhm.org (BDH), jjohnson@utep.edu (JDJ), vmata@utep.edu (VMS), arocha3@miners.utep.edu (AR), dominic.desantis@gcsu.edu
(DLD), empub@msn.com (LWP), bufodoc@aol.com (LDW)
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 57 November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
de agua, las especies invasoras, el pastoreo de ganado, el comercio ilegal, las actividades todoterreno, las
enfermedades infecciosas y el cambio climatico. Evaluamos el estado de conservacion de las especies nativas
empleando los sistemas de SEMARNAT, UICN y EVS. De las 158 especies nativas, 85 estan incluidas en la
NOM-059-SEMARNAT, 15 en las categorias Amenazadas de la UICN y 76 presentaron valores elevados de EVS.
Mediante el uso de los dos métodos de prioridad herpetofaunistica relativa (RHP) para identificar la importancia
del orden de rango de las 10 regiones geograficas, se obtuvieron los dos rangos mas altos para la region de las
Islas del Golfo. Treinta areas protegidas se encuentran en la Peninsula de Baja California y comprenden casi
la mitad del area total. Todas menos ocho de las 158 especies nativas de herpetofauna estan representadas
dentro del sistema de areas protegidas. Se han completado pocos estudios de herpetofauna para las areas
protegidas, por lo que este es un objetivo de conservacion importante para el futuro.
Palabras Claves: Anuros, caudados, escamosos, tortugas, regiones fisiograficas, areas protegidas, estatus de
conservacion, recomendaciones de proteccion
Citation: Peralta-Garcia A, Valdez-Villavicencio JH, Fucsko LA, Hollingsworth BD, Johnson JD, Mata-Silva V, Rocha A, DeSantis DL, Porras LW,
and Wilson LD. 2023. The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula and its adjacent islands, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation
status. Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 17(1&2): 57-142 (e326).
Copyright: © 2023 Peralta-Garcia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
[Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/], which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction
in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. The official and authorized publication credit sources, which will be duly enforced,
are as follows: official journal title Amphibian & Reptile Conservation; official journal website: amphibian-reptile-conservation.org.
Accepted: 2 August 2023; Published: 19 November 2023
“ .. Baja California possesses a wild, intangible allure.
An innate sense of adventure, heightened by a hint of
danger and the unknown, beckons many explorers off the
highway into Baja‘’s harsh, poorly understood interior.
Baja California’s jagged, snow-covered peaks, volcanic
badlands, parched deserts with relentless summer
temperatures, and arid, uninhabited desert islands have
been reluctant to give up their secrets. There is still much
knowledge to be attained and many personal challenges
to be met.”
L. Lee Grismer (2002)
Introduction
One of the most distinctive features of the physiography
of Mexico is the Baja California Peninsula, a finger-
like extension of land flanked by small islands, which
comprises two states of the 32 federal entities in the
country, 1.e., Baja California to the north and Baja
California Sur to the south. These two states are separated
from one another at latitude 28° N, just slightly to the
north of Punta Eugenia, the northwestern point of the
Peninsula de Vizcaino (Grismer 2002).
A succinct description of the physiography of the
peninsula is provided in the now-classic volume on the
herpetofauna authored by L. Lee Grismer (2002), in
which the introduction (pg. 3) includes the following
quote: “Today Baja California is a thin northwest to
southeast-tending peninsula nearly 1,300 km long. It is
situated between 32° 30’ N latitude and 117° W longitude
at its northwestern corner and [between] 23° N and 110°
W at its southern tip. Its width ranges from approximately
240 km along the U.S. —Mexico border to less than 30 km
at the Isthmus of La Paz. It is separated from the state
of Sonora by the Rio Colorado in the north and from
the rest of Sonora and mainland Mexico by the Gulf of
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
California, approximately 160 km wide. The area of Baja
California is approximately 143,400 km/?, and its coastline
is approximately 3,300 km long. Associated with the
coastline are forty-five major islands, each at least 1.3
km? in area. Several smaller islands are also associated
with Baja California, and an additional 10 or so major
islands are principally associated with the Mexican states
of Sonora and Sinaloa... [which are not considered in
this paper].” More details on the physiography of this
peninsula are provided in the section below entitled
“Physiography and Climate.”
With an area of 71,450 km”, the state of Baja California
is the 12" largest in Mexico and the 19" most densely
populated. The corresponding data for the state of Baja
California Sur are 73,909 km7, the 9" largest, and the 32"
most densely populated (http://inegi.org.mx; accessed 8
June 2023).
Given the relative geographic isolation of the peninsula
from the mainland of both the United States and Mexico,
this area is expected to be characterized by a significant
degree of endemism, especially since the mainland of the
peninsula is flanked by a large number of variously sized
islands. Also, given the limited range of these endemic
species, they are expected to be subjected to the usual
range of anthropogenic threats. Thus, the purpose of this
paper is to examine these aspects as they relate to the
interesting herpetofauna of this offset region of Mexico.
Materials and Methods
Our Taxonomic Position
In this paper, we follow the same taxonomic position
as explained in previous works on other portions of
Mesoamerica (Johnson et al. 2015; Mata-Silva et al.
2015; Teran-Juarez et al. 2016; Woolrich-Pifia et al.
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
2016; Nevarez-de los Reyes et al. 2016; Cruz-Saenz et
al. 2017; Gonzalez-Sanchez et al. 2017; Woolrich-Pifia
et al. 2017; Lazcano et al. 2019; Ramirez-Bautista et al.
2020; Torres-Hernandez et al. 2021; Cruz Elizalde et
al. 2022). Johnson et al. (2015) can be consulted for a
detailed statement of this position, with special reference
to the subspecies concept.
System for Determining Distributional Status
The system developed by Alvarado-Diaz et al. (2013)
for the herpetofauna of Michoacan was employed to
ascertain the distributional status of members of the
herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula, which
consists of the following four categories: SE, endemic to
the Baja California Peninsula; CE, endemic to Mexico;
NE, not endemic to Mexico; and NN, non-native in
Mexico.
Systems for Determining Conservation Status
The following three systems were used to determine
the conservation status of the 158 native species
of amphibians and reptiles in the Baja California
Peninsula; SEMARNAT, IUCN, and EVS. The
SEMARNAT system, established by the Secretaria de
Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, lists only the
threatened species in the NOM 059-SEMARNAT-2010
(SEMARNAT 2010, 2019) under three categories:
Endangered (P), Threatened (A), and Subject to Special
Protection (Pr). For species not included on that list,
we used the designation “No Status;” however, we
acknowledge that the SEMARNAT list is not meant to
include non-threatened species. For species included on
that list for which taxonomy has changed, we maintain
the conservation status of the previous taxonomic entity,
following section six of NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010
(SEMARANT 2010).
The IUCN system (https://www.iucnredlist.org) is
utilized widely for assessing the conservation status of
species on a global scale. The categories include Extinct
(EX), Extinct in the Wild (EW), Critically Endangered
(CR), Endangered (EN), Vulnerable (VU), Near
Threatened (NT), Least Concern (LC), Data Deficient
(DD), and Not Evaluated (NE). Collectively, the three
categories of Critically Endangered, Endangered,
and Vulnerable are termed the “threat categories” to
distinguish them from the other six.
The EVS system was applied here for the 158
native species, following Wilson et al. (2013a,b). A re-
evaluation was conducted because of taxonomic changes
that have transpired since their original EVS values were
reported, as well as regional differences in the degree of
human persecution in mainland Mexico, as required for
criterion C. The EVS measure was not designed for use
with marine species (e.g., marine turtles and sea snakes),
and 1s generally not applied to non-native species.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
The Mexican Conservation Series
The Mexican Conservation Series (MCS) was initiated
in 2013, with a study of the herpetofauna of Michoacan
(Alvarado-Diaz et al. 2013) that was published as part
of a set of five papers designated as the Special Mexico
Issue in Amphibian & Reptile Conservation. The basic
format of the entries in the MCS was established in that
paper, i1.e., examining the composition, physiographic
distribution, and conservation status of the herpetofauna
of a given Mexican state or group of states. Two years
later, the MCS resumed with a paper on the herpetofauna
of Oaxaca (Mata-Silva et al. 2015). That year, Johnson
et al. (2015) authored a paper on the herpetofauna of
Chiapas, and three entries in the MCS appeared the
next year, covering Tamaulipas (Teran-Juarez et al.
2016), Nayarit (Woolrich-Pifia et al. 2016), and Nuevo
Leon (Nevarez-de los Reyes et al. 2016). The following
year three additional entries appeared, covering Jalisco
(Cruz-Saenz et al. 2017), the Mexican Yucatan Peninsula
(Gonzalez-Sanchez et al. 2017), and Puebla (Woolrich-
Pifa et al. 2017). Subsequently, similar articles on
Coahuila (Lazcano et al. 2019), Hidalgo (Ramirez-
Bautista et al. 2020), and Veracruz (Torres-Hernandez et
al. 2021) were published. Last year, articles on Querétaro
(Cruz Elizalde et al. 2022), Tabasco (Barragan- Vazquez
et al. 2022), and Guanajuato (Leyte-Manrique et al. 2022)
appeared. Thus, this article on the herpetofauna of the
Baja California Peninsula is the 16" entry in this series.
Geography and Climate
Geographic Regions
The formation of the Baja California Peninsula in
northwestern Mexico originated from a complex
interaction of plate tectonics, which resulted in the
formation of the Gulf of California. There are a large
number of climatic variables and a varied topography
along the peninsula (Shreve and Wiggins 1964; Grismer
2002; Hollingsworth et al. 2015). The interactions among
these climatic and topographic variables have given rise
to several distinct physiographic regions.
These characteristics also resulted in the formation
of different phytogeographical regions, which can be
distinguished by the different types of vegetation (Fig.
1). This situation is linked to the “double ecological
polarity” that occurs on the peninsula (Gonzalez-
Abraham et al. 2010). First, a north-to-south gradient
with a temperate climate in the northwest and a tropical
climate in the south contains an extensive arid transition
region between the two. Then, an east-to-west gradient
has resulted from the combination of a mountain range
distributed intermittently along the peninsula and the
influence of two different marine water masses which are
cold in the Pacific and warm in the Gulf of California
(Gonzalez-Abraham et al. 2010).
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
118°0'0"W 116°0'O"W
32°0'0"N
30°0'0"N
28°0'0"N
Physiographic regions
"> California
~ Baja California Coniferous Forest
~~ Lower Colorado Valley
\— Vizcaino
Central Gulf Coast
)) Magdalena
Arid Tropical
MY Sierra La Laguna
MW Pacific Islands
> Gulf Islands
26°0'0"N
24°0'0"N
118°0'0"W 116°0'0"W
114°0'O"W
114°0'0"W
112°0'0"W 110°0'0"W
32°0'0"N
30°0'0"N
28°0'0"N
26°0'0"N
24°0'0"N
112°0'0"W 110°0'O"W
Fig. 1. Geographic regions of the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico.
The distribution of the herpetofauna of the Baja
California Peninsula coincides with the phytogeographic
regions (Grismer 1994, 2002). As indicators of the
natural biotic provinces, they likely are influenced
by the same environmental characteristics that limit
the distributions of amphibians and reptiles (Grismer
2002). The following 10 regions have been identified:
(1) California; (2) Coniferous Forest; (3) Lower
Colorado Desert; (4) Vizcaino Desert; (5) Central Gulf
Coast Desert; (6) Magdalena; (7) Sierra La Laguna;
(8) Arid Tropical; (9) Pacific Islands; and (10) Gulf
Islands. Shreve and Wiggins (1964), Wiggins (1980),
and Grismer (2002) defined these regions, and they are
briefly described below.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
60
California Region. Located in the northwestern
quarter of the peninsula, this region (Fig. 2) extends 275
km from the border with the United States to the vicinity
of El Rosario along the Pacific coast, where it slowly
intergrades into the Vizcaino Desert Region to the south
(Hollingsworth et al. 2015). During the Pleistocene, the
California Region likely extended farther southward
onto the peninsula. However, successive periods of
aridification replaced these communities with deserts
that include remnants of the California Region flora
(Van Devender 1990). Today, the California Region is
confined to the northern state of Baja California. To the
east, the region extends up the Sierra Juarez and Sierra
San Pedro Martir to an elevation of 2,000 m at the start
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
(3,100 m), is seen in the background. Photo by Felipe Leon.
of the pine belt, with a mixed chaparral-coniferous forest
zone found at elevations between 1,500 and 2,000 m
(Delgadillo 2004). Farther to the east, the California
Region comes into contact and intermixes with the
Lower Colorado Desert in low-elevation passes between
the mountains. Throughout this region, oak and willow
forests primarily border the rivers that flow down from
the mountains to the west, and thus dominate the riparian
zones, and many of these rivers still flow year-round at
mid to high elevations. Overall, the region 1s relatively
cool for most of the year, due to the cold California
Current that drives winds blowing off the Pacific
Ocean waters, bathing the low elevations in morning
fog (Hastings and Turner 1965; Markham 1972; Meigs
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
61
Fig. 3. Coniferous forest in Sierra San Pedro Martir, Baja California. Picacho del Diablo (left), the highest peak on the peninsula
1966). Temperatures during the summer months average
20 to 25 °C, whereas winter temperatures average 10.0
to 12.5 °C. The precipitation comes from the tail end of
Pacific winter storms that originate from the north, with
a prominent decline in rain farther south (Humphrey
1974). This region is a southern extension of the coastal
sage scrub and chaparral communities of southern
California, which are dominated by sages (Artemisia and
Salvia), buckwheat (Eriogonum), lilacs (Ceanothus), and
chamise (Adenostoma).
Coniferous Forest Region. Prominent forests occur
in both the Sierras Juarez and San Pedro Martir (Fig.
3), which extend from the United States in the north
and represent the southernmost segment of the Sierran
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
OEE a ike ide
Fig. 4. Vegetation in the Lower Colorado Region at Valle del Borrego, Sierra San Felipe, Baja California. Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-
Villavicencio.
Montane Conifer Forest (Pase 1982). These Peninsular
Range mountains are confined to the northern state of
Baja California and extend southward from the United
States-Mexico border for approximately 300 km.
Oriented in a north-south direction, they gradually rise
along their western slopes, crest with peaks as high
as 3,100 m, and rapidly descend to the desert floor
with steep eastern escarpments. The mean monthly
air temperatures range from -0.2 to 17 °C. This region
has the most reliable precipitation on the peninsula,
and receives more rainfall than any other area in Baja
California (Hastings and Turner 1965). The majority of
the precipitation falls during winter and spring in the form
of snow at the higher elevations. Summer brings more
variable thunderstorms, when the tropical air moving in
a northwesterly direction is uplifted and cooled along
the steep eastern slopes of the mountains (Humphrey
1974). The mountains contain extensive meadows that
fill with water. The floristic composition of the region
is relatively diverse, defined mainly by large shrubs
and trees, which are dominated by Jeffrey Pines (Pinus
Jeffreyi), manzanitas (Arctostaphylos), oaks (Quercus),
firs (Abies), aspens (Populus), and cedars (Calocedrus)
(Garcillan et al. 2012).
Lower Colorado Desert Region. The Lower Colorado
Desert (Fig. 4) is the largest subregion of the Sonoran
Desert and extends across southeastern California,
southwestern Arizona, northwestern Sonora, and
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
62
northeastern Baja California (Shreve 1951). On the
peninsula, this low-elevation desert extends from the
Peninsular Ranges to the west and the Colorado River to
the east. Confined to the northern state of Baja California,
it extends for 450 km southward from the border of the
United States to the vicinity of Bahia de los Angeles,
where it intergrades widely with the Gulf Coast Desert
Region (Peinado et al. 1994). This region contains the
late Miocene to Pliocene sedimentary deposits of the
Colorado River and the receding waters of the Gulf of
California, and is composed of broad expansive basins
with elevations ranging from below sea level to 400
m (Spencer and Pearthree 2001). Along this region’s
northeastern boundary, the Rio Colorado once provided
a rich aquatic ecosystem in the middle of a harsh desert.
Today, water no longer flows from the river to the Gulf
of California due to its diversion for agricultural and
urban use. The mean temperatures for July and August
are above 32.5 °C, while the mean winter temperature
is 12.5 °C (Markham 1972). Lying in the rainshadow of
the Sierras Juarez and San Pedro Martir, this region is
the hottest and most barren desert on the peninsula, as it
receives less than 5 cm of annual rainfall. Creosote Bush
(Larrea tridentata), Burro Weed (Ambrosia dumosa), and
Ocotillos (Fouqueria splendens) dominate the vegetation
of this region, but it also contains other arid-adapted
plants such as mesquites, agaves, palo verde, and various
forms of cacti (Gonzalez-Abraham et al. 2010).
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
Fig. 5. A view of the Vizcaino Region at Sierra La Asamblea, Baja California, as seen from Transpeninsular Highway 1. Photo by
Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
Fig. 6. South of Vizcaino, Baja California Sur; fog is an essential component of this region. Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
Vizcaino Desert Region. This region (Figs. 5-6)
is located in the central portion of the peninsula, and
extends from the California and Lower Colorado
Desert Regions to Laguna San Ignacio. It 1s bordered
by the Pacific Ocean to the west, but its eastern extent
varies greatly and generally is limited by the Central
Gulf Coast Desert Region that borders the Gulf of
California. The southern portion of the Vizcaino Desert
Region is much flatter, with elevations just above sea
level, whereas the northern portion consists of smaller
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
mountain ranges, mesas, and dry washes that are no
higher than 1,000 m (Bostic 1971). This region spans
both Baja California and Baja California Sur. Many
spring-fed oases are found throughout this region and
support more mesic communities (Grismer and McGuire
1993). It also experiences a “fog type” temperate desert
climate, with limited winter and summer precipitation
(Meigs 1966). The mild climate is greatly influenced by
prevailing westerly winds coming off the Pacific Ocean,
which generate the conditions for heavy fog (Bostic
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
oe
Fig. 8. Vegetation in the
Villavicencio.
1971). Rainfall occurs in the winter and averages only
5.5 cm. The mean air temperatures range between 23
and 28 °C during the summer, and 15° and 18 °C in
winter (Markham 1972). Overall, this region often has
overcast skies and a mild climate that receives little rain.
In much of the region, the vegetation is open, stunted,
widely spaced, and depauperate, because of continuous
onshore winds from the Pacific Ocean (Grismer 2002).
In areas protected from the winds, plant diversity
increases sharply and the dominant plants include Cirios
(Fouquieria columnaris), Baja California Tree Yucca
(Yucca valida), Cardon (Pachycereus pringlei), Elephant
Trees (Pachycormus discolor), mesquites (Prosopis),
and agaves (Agave) (Garcillan et al. 2012).
Central Gulf Coast Desert Region. This long and
narrow region (Figs. 7-9) lies along the eastern coast
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
a
Central Gulf Coast Region near Bahia Concepcion, Baja California Sur. Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-
of the peninsula, extends southward from Bahia de
los Angeles to the Cape Region, and spans both states
on the peninsula (Shreve and Wiggins 1964). Broad
intermixing occurs between this region and the Lower
Colorado Desert to the north (Peinado et al. 1994),
whereas its boundaries to the west are marked by the
uplift of the Peninsular Ranges. The elevation ranges
from sea level to 800 m. This region 1s hot and arid,
and receives nearly all of its precipitation during the
summer and fall. Severe droughts occur in spring, a time
when the mean precipitation is only 0.20 cm (Hastings
and Turner 1965; Humphrey 1974). The majority of
the Central Gulf Coast Desert rainfall originates from
southern convectional storms, and appears as run-off
from the bordering Peninsular Range. Occasionally, the
region receives rainfall from hurricanes that originate
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
a
Fig. 10. View of the Magdalena Region at La Purisima, Baja California Sur. Photo by Gerardo Marron.
in the southern tropical waters and track northward.
Despite periods of severe drought, the annual mean
rainfall can reach 16.8 cm (Hastings and Turner 1965)
when there has been an active hurricane season. The
mean temperatures for the warmest summer months are
above 30 °C, whereas the mean winter temperatures
fall to around 15 °C (Markham 1972). Arid-adapted
plants that include Elephant Trees (P. discolor), Palo
Blanco (Lysiloma candidum), \omboy (Jatropha),
Palo Adan (Fouquieria diguettii), and various forms
of cacti, including large columnar forms, characterize
the vegetation. Some mangroves are also present
in the southern part of this region, where Black
Mangrove (Avicennia germinans) and White Mangrove
(Laguncularia racemosa) are the most predominant
species (Gonzalez-Zamorano et al. 2011; Garcillan et
al. 2012).
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
San Basilio,
65
Baja California Sur. Photo
: Ss
Magdalena Region. This region (Figs. 10-12) extends
from Laguna San Ignacio to the Cape Region, along the
southwestern coast of the peninsula, and receives the
Pacific drainages of the Sierra Guadalupe and Sierra La
Giganta. Its eastern border is defined by the uplift of the
Peninsular Ranges and its contact with the Central Gulf
Coast Desert. This region is confined to Baja California
Sur, and is composed of a rugged mountainous region
along the eastern border and a flat open plain along
the western portion. The mountains contain volcanic
badlands interspersed with spring-fed oases (Grismer
and McGuire 1993), whereas the western plains consist
of sandy fluvial deposits that rely on run-off from the
mountains. The elevation in this region ranges from sea
level to 1,100 m. The coastal areas receive cool morning
fog, but precipitation is low and unpredictable. The mean
annual rainfall can reach 12.5 cm (Hastings and Turner
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
" ae tn
Fig. 11. View of the Madgalena Region at Los Burros, Baja California Sur. Photo by Bradford Hollingsworth.
a
a ag aan A
Fig. 12. View of the Magdalena Region at 3.4 km NW Puerto Cancun, B
1965). The mean temperatures for the warmest summer
months are above 29 °C, whereas the mean winter
temperatures are only 17 °C (Markham 1972). Creosote
Bush (Larrea tridentata), Elephant Trees (Bursera),
Peninsular Palo Verde (Parkinsonia florida), and
columnar and various other types of cacti, mesquites, and
palms (Washingtonia) in oases dominate the vegetation
(Garcillan et al. 2012).
Sierra La Laguna Region. The Sierra La Laguna
Region (Fig. 13) is located at the southern tip of the
Baja California Peninsula, within the Cape Region, and
contains dense forests at the higher elevations. Formed
by granitic and intrusive rock, these mountains rise to an
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
66
Pe
aja California Sur. Photo by Gerardo Marron.
elevation of 2,200 m, and have undergone a long history
of isolation (Garcillan et al. 2012). Confined to the state of
Baja California Sur, this region extends from above 800
m and receives its moisture from summer convectional
storms and passing hurricanes. The mean annual rainfall
can reach 29.6 cm (Hastings and Turner 1965). Due to a
wide range in elevation, the temperatures vary greatly.
At the higher elevations, the mean temperatures for
the warmest summer months are above 18 °C, whereas
the mean winter temperatures are only 8 °C (Markham
1972). The vegetation contains numerous endemics, and
the mid-elevation slopes are covered with oak woodlands
(Quercus tuberculata,; O. brandegeei), while the upper
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
Fig. 13. A view of Sierra La Laguna, the highest mountain range in Baja California Sur, as seen from Segundo Valle. Photo by Jorge
H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
if
Fig. 14. Arid Tropical Region vegetation is evident along Transpeninsular Highway 1, south of La Paz between San Antonio and
San Bartolo, Baja California Sur. Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
elevations are covered with pine-oak woodlands (Q.
devia and Pinus lagunae), Peninsular Madrone (Arbutus
peninsularis), and Belding Bear-grass (Nolina beldingii)
(Garcillan et al. 2012).
Arid Tropical Region. This region (Fig. 14) is
comprised of the Sierra La Giganta, located along the
central uplift of the southern peninsula and the lowlands
of the Cape Region, and extends from south of the Isthmus
of La Paz to the southern terminus of the peninsula. In
the Cape Region, two well-differentiated landscapes of
mountain foothills and coastal alluvial plains characterize
this region (Garcillan et al. 2012). The foothills extend
from 500 to 1,000 m in elevation and intermix with the
Sierra La Laguna Region, whereas the alluvial plains are
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
67
found from sea level to 500 m. This region is confined to
the state of Baja California Sur. The mean annual rainfall
can reach 29.2 cm (Hastings and Turner 1965), and
usually occurs in late summer and early fall. This region
is hot, with mean temperatures for the warmest summer
months above 28.8 °C (Markham 1972). The vegetation
is composed of tropical dry forests in the foothills that
remain leafless in the dry season, but rebound with the
late summer rains. The vegetation includes a variety
of woody trees like Palo Blanco (Lysiloma candidum),
Mauto (L. divaricatum), Plumeria (Plumeria rubra),
and Cardon Barbon (Pachycereus pecten-aboriginum).
The coastal lowlands are composed of a fleshy-stemmed
shrubland that includes elephant trees (Bursera), Ashy
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
ee au
Se,
Fig. 15. A view from the southern end of the Todos Santos Sur island in which the northern part of the south island and the Todos
Santos Norte island, including its lighthouse, are visible. Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
Limberbush (Jatropha cinerea), figs (Ficus brandegeei),
and succulents (Garcillan et al. 2012).
The Pacific Islands. Along the west coast of the
peninsula, the Pacific Ocean 1s dominated by the California
Current System, which extends from Alaska to northern
Baja California, but seasonally extends southward to the
tip of the peninsula (Hickey 1979; Badan-Dangon et al.
1989). The California Current consists of a year-round
equatorward surface flow that brings cool water down
the coastal waters of the peninsula (Kurczyn et al. 2019).
On the contrary, the coast of mainland Mexico to the
south is exposed to warmer waters from the Equatorial
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Fig. 16. Islas los Coronado (four islands), Baja California. View from Coronado Sur, of Coronado Norte, Pilon de Azucar, and
Coronado Medio. Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
Countercurrent that feeds the Costa Rica Coastal Current
flowing poleward, bringing warm counterflows northward
along the peninsula (Badan-Dangon et al. 1989). During
El Nifio years, the poleward surface currents intensify and
bring warmer water farther north, along with some marine
reptiles (Grismer 2002). The west coast of the peninsula
also contains extensive lagoons and bays which provide
important warm-water shelters that are preferred by some
sea turtles (Senko et al. 2010).
The Pacific Islands (Figs. 15-17) extend along much
of the length of the peninsula, from the Islas Coronado
offshore from Tijuana, which are located just south of the
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
Fig. 17. Todos Santos Sur Island is almost entirely invaded by different species of dense grasses (e.g., Bromus and Avena) and ice
plants, which displace the native vegetation. The invasion of introduced grasses and ice plants (Vesembryanthemum crystallinum)
occurs throughout the peninsula. Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
border between California in the United States and Baja
California in Mexico, to Isla Creciente, the southernmost
island of the insular group, which lies off the Magdalena
region of the southwestern peninsula. As noted by
Grismer (2002: 9), “the islands of the Pacific coast of
Baja California are all landbridge in origin, except for
the Islas San Benito, which are oceanic...The largest
and most environmentally diverse Pacific island is Isla
Cedros, which reaches nearly 1,200 m in elevation. The
remaining islands are generally low, small, and rocky,
with the notable exception of Isla Creciente, the long,
narrow sandbar enclosing the southern end of Bahia
Magdalena.”
The Gulf Islands. The Gulf of California is a 1,400
km long semi-enclosed sea that extends from a depth
of more than 3,000 m at the southern entrance to only
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
200 m at its enclosed end at the Colorado River outlet
(Alvarez-Borrego 2002; Lavin and Marinone 2003).
The entrance to the Gulf of California is exposed to
warmer waters from the poleward flowing Costa Rica
Coastal Current (Badan-Dangon et al. 1989). The
current in the sea flows northward along the mainland
coast and southward down the peninsula during the
summer months, and then reverses direction during the
winter (Alvarez-Borrego 2002). The mean temperatures
in the northern portion of the sea are 8.2 °C in December
and 32.6 °C in August (Alvarez-Borrego 2002).
Numerous islands and bays (Figs. 18-23) provide a
diversity of coastal microhabitats that are favorable to
marine reptiles, including sandy beaches, mangrove
forests, reefs, and shelters, whereas deep water pelagic
conditions exist in the southern Gulf of California,
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
al ee | Yer @ %& a : ai Se ya 3 , cy ee ao > a?
Fig. 18. View of the shore of Isla Carmen located in the southern Gulf of California and protected within Parque Nacional Bahia de
Loreto. This island is part of the Bahia de Loreto National Park. Photo by Bradford D. Hollingsworth.
tees ;
Sa ee
Fig. 19. View of Puerto Balandra, Isla Carmen, a small bay on the northwestern side of the island, representing the typical arid habitat
found within the Gulf Island Region, and home to the single-region endemics Sauromalus slevini and Aspidoscelis carmenensis.
Photo by Bradford D. Hollingsworth.
which support open-water species (Santamaria-del- in the Baja California Peninsula are given in Table 1.
Angel et al. 1994; Lavin and Marinone 2003). The elevations for these localities range from 3 m at
Isla Cedros in the Pacific Islands to 1,580 m at Laguna
Climate Hanson in the Baja California Coniferous Forest.
The mean annual temperature (MAT) 1s highest at
Temperature. The monthly minimum, mean, and Loreto (elevation 20 m) in the Central Gulf Coast Region
maximum temperatures for one representative locality | and lowest at Laguna Hanson (elevation 1,580 m) in the
from each of the 10 geographic regions we recognize — Baja California Coniferous Forest Region.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 70 November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
Fig. 20. View of the uninhabited Isla San Francisco, a small island located in the southern Gulf of California and home to the single-
region endemics Aspidoscelis celeripes and A. franciscensis. Photo by Bradford D. Hollingsworth.
. a ie a
Fig. 21. View of Isla Carmen, Gulf of California, protected within Parque Nacional Bahia de Loreto. Photo by Bradford D.
Hollingsworth.
Fig. 22. View of the uninhabited Isla Santa Catalina, also known as Catalana Island, located in the Gulf of California off the coast
of Loreto, Baja California Sur, which is protected within Parque Nacional Bahia de Loreto and home to some of the most vulnerable
species, including nine single-region endemics. Photo by Bradford D. Hollingsworth.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. TA November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Fig. 23. Aerial view of the uninhabited Isla Danzante, which is protected within Parque Nacional Bahia de Loreto, with cliffs up
to 150 m, representing the rugged topography typical of islands in the Gulf Island Region. Photo by Bradford D. Hollingsworth.
Among the 10 geographic regions of the Baja
California Peninsula, the minimum annual temperatures
range from 2.2 °C at Laguna Hanson in the Baja California
Coniferous Forest to 17.8 °C in three localities: Santo
Tomas (180 m) in the California Region, Loreto (20 m)
in the Central Gulf Coast Region, and El Barril (50 m) in
the Gulf Islands Region.
The minimum monthly temperatures peak in either
July (Baja California Coniferous Forest Region), August
(California Region, Lower Colorado Valley Region,
Vizcaino Region, Central Gulf Coast Region, Magdalena
Region, Arid Tropical Region, Sierra La Laguna Region,
and Gulf Islands Region), or August and September
(Pacific Islands Region). The minimum monthly
temperatures reach their lowest levels in either January
(California, Lower Colorado Valley, Baja California
Coniferous Forest, Central Gulf Coast, Magdalena, Arid
Tropical, Sierra La Laguna, Pacific Islands, and Gulf
Islands regions) or December and January (Vizcaino
region).
The maximum monthly temperatures are highest in
either July (Lower Colorado Valley and Baja California
Coniferous Forest regions), August (California, Vizcaino,
Central Gulf Coast, Magdalena, Arid Tropical, Sierra
La Laguna, and Gulf Islands regions), or September
(Pacific Islands region), and are lowest in either January
(California, Lower Colorado Valley, Baja California
Coniferous Forest, Central Gulf Coast, Magdalena, Arid
Tropical, Sierra La Laguna, Pacific Islands, and Gulf
Islands regions) or December and January (Vizcaino
region).
Precipitation. The patterns of precipitation in the Baja
California Peninsula are peculiar compared to those
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
72
of other regions in Mexico. Whereas the rainy and dry
seasons are confined to specific sets of six months during
the year in most areas of Mexico, the rainy season in the
Baja California Peninsula is comprised of no more than
three or four months. In addition, the months involved
are not the same throughout the Peninsula, and are not
necessarily sequential.
Table 2 provides the precipitation data for 10 localities
within each of the 10 geographic regions that we
recognize in the peninsula, including the Pacific and Gulf
islands. The rainy season extends for three months in the
Lower Colorado Valley, the Baja California Coniferous
Forest, the Central Gulf Coast, the Magdalena Region,
and the Pacific Islands; while it extends for four months
in the other five regions. The months involved in the
3-month regions are August through October (in the
Lower Colorado Valley, the Central Gulf Coast, and the
Magdalena Region), January through March (in the Baja
California Coniferous Forest), and December through
February (in the Pacific Islands). Those included in the
4-month regions are December through March (in the
California Region), September through December (in
the Vizcaino Region), August through November (in
the Arid Tropical Region), July through October (in the
Sierra La Laguna Region), and August through October
plus December (in the Gulf Islands).
The annual precipitation ranges from 52.2 mm in
the Pacific Islands to 581.8 mm in the Sierra La Laguna
Region. The mean annual precipitation for the 10 regions
is 211.3 mm. The six annual precipitation values lying
below this mean are for the Lower Colorado Valley (60.8
mm), the Vizcaino Region (86.0 mm), the Central Gulf
Coast Region (160.0 mm), the Magdalena Region (127.0
mm), the Pacific Islands (52.2 mm), and the Gulf Islands
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
Table 1. Monthly minimum, mean (in parentheses), maximum, and annual temperature data (in °C) for the 10 geographic regions
of the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico. Localities in each region and their elevations are as follows: California, Santo Tomas
(180 m); Lower Colorado Valley, El Mayor (15 m); Baja California Coniferous Forest, Laguna Hanson (1,580 m); Vizcaino, Benito
Juarez (55 m); Central Gulf Coast, Loreto (20 m); Magdalena, La Purisima (95 m); Arid Tropical, San José del Cabo (20 m); Sierra
La Laguna, San Vicente de la Sierra (650 m); Pacific Islands, Isla Cedros (3 m); and Gulf Islands, El Barril (SO m). Data were taken
from Servicio Meteorologico Nacional at https://smn.conagua.gob.mx (accessed 18 July 2022).
3 5.7 7.2 9.5 5.6 3.3
n
5 4. 9.5 11.2 13.6 14.3 13.3
California (12.2) (18.3)
49
Lower Colorado Valley (12.6)
20.2
Annual
17.8
(17.8)
27.2
(16.0)
24.7
(14.0)
223
(13.0)
21.3
(20.9)
30.6
(24.1)
34.6
(24.6)
34.8
(23.6)
34.0
(19.5)
29.5
(15.2)
24.8
6
(12.4)
20.9 yep 21.5
6.6 8.5
(14.1) | (16.3)
21.6 | 242
10.4 13 16.1 19.3
(18.7) | (23.8) } (28.6) | (31.3)
27 34.6 43.4
19.8 17.5 13.2 8.8 5.2 11.9
(31.3) | (28.6) | (23) | (17.1) | 2.8) | @1.5)
429 | 396 | 329 | 255 | 204 31.1
9.1 71 Db: -0.8 2.4 ae)
(18.5) | (16.2) | (41a) | (74) | (6.4) (10.7)
279 | 254 20 15.7 13.4 19.1
17.0 13.6 9.5 6.9 11.6
(22.9) | (19.5) | (16.7) | (20.9)
32.2 | 294 | 264 30.2
(25.9)
34.9
20.7 15.8 12.2 17.8
(26.9) | (22.0) | (18.3) | (24.0)
33.1 283 | 244 30.2
4]
oa 5.6 9.5
(11.5) | (15.1) | (19.0)
20.3 | 246 | 284
Baja Californi -2.7 -2.3 -1.6 0
Coniferous Forest e>) G4) OP (8.0)
11.7 13.1 12.9 16
6.4 7.3 8.8
Vizcaino (16.4) | (17.2) | (18.3)
26.4 27.1 27.9
11.0 11.2 12.4
Central Gulf Coast (17.2) | (17.9) | (19.3)
23.5 24.6 26.3
10.2
(19.5)
28.8
12.0 13.5 16.1 17.5
(20.6) | (22.1) | (25.1) | (26.6)
29.2 | 30.7 | 342 | 357
14.6
(21.8)
28.9
17.6
(24.7)
31.8
21.8
(28.2)
34.6
25.6
(30.7)
35.8
26.0
(31.1)
36.1
24.8
(30.2)
35.5
10.6 12.3
(20.7) | (22.0)
30.7 | 31.8
152 | 20.1
(24.7) | (28.6)
34.2 | 372
21.5
(29.6)
37.7
20.8
(28.9)
37.1
15.9 11.7 9.5
(25.2) | (21.2) } (18.4)
34.4 | 30.7 | 273
13.8
(22.9)
32.1
8.6 9.0 98
Magdalena (17.7) | (18.5) | (19.5)
26.8 28.0 29.2
12.0 12.0 ee
(18.9) | (19.2) | (20.1)
258 | 264 | 27.4
6.4 7.2 8.4
Sierra La Laguna (15.7) | (16.5) | (17.7)
24.9 25.8 27.1
143 14.7 14.7
Pacific Islands (18.6) | (19.1) | (19.2)
22.8
10.8 11.5 12.8
Gulf Islands
23.4 | 23.6
(16.4) | (17.3) | (18.8)
219 | 23.1 | 247
(91.6 mm). The four values lying above this mean are for
the California Region (274.9 mm), the Baja California
13.4
(20.2)
26.9
17.4
(23.8)
30.2
14.8 17.1
(21.9) | (24.0)
29.1 30.9
20.5
(26.5)
32.6
23.3
(28.5)
33.8
23.8
(28.9)
33.9
23.0
(28.2)
33.4
18.1
(26.2)
34.4
20.5 19.1 17.0 15.1 17.1
(25.0) | (23.8) | (21.4) | (19.2) | (21.5)
295. || =28.6>|| 3257 | 4230 26.0
20.1 16.3
(26.2) | (23.2)
32.3 | 301
Arid Tropical
19.8
(27.9)
36.6
16.0 11.7 8.2
(24.6) | (20.7) | (17.4)
33.2 | 297 | 266
13.0
(22.1)
31.1
10.9
(21.0)
31.1
13.9 16.5 19.4
(23.6) | (25.8) | (27.9)
33.3 | 352 | 364
15.7 16.3 17.3 19.4
(20.5) | (21.0) } (21.7) | (24.0)
25.3 | 257 | 262 | 286
20.5
(24.9)
29.4
20.1 14.8 11.4
(25.8) | (20.6) | (17.0)
31.4 | 264 | 226
17.8
(23.3)
28.8
15.0
(21.0)
27.1
17.7
(23.6)
29.5
22.0
(27.7)
33.4
26.0
(30.7)
35.4
26.3
(30.8)
35.4
24.8
(29.8)
34.7
The range of percentages for the 3-month rainy seasons
is 45.1-69.9% while it is 55.6-89.4% for the 4-month
Coniferous Forest (390.9 mm), the Arid Tropical Region
(288.0 mm), and the Sierra La Laguna Region (581.8
mm).
The percentages of annual precipitation that occur
during the rainy season are as follows:
¢ California Region: 210.8/274.9 = 76.7% (4-month
rainy season)
¢ Lower California Valley: 27.4/60.8 =
(3-month)
¢ Baja California Coniferous Forest: 176.4/390.9 =
45.1% (3-month)
¢ Vizcaino Region: 47.8/86.0 = 55.6% (4-month)
¢ Central Gulf Coast Region: 111.9/160.0 = 69.9%
(3-month)
¢ Magdalena Region: 66.1/127.0 = 52.0% (3-month)
45.1%
rainy seasons.
Composition of the Herpetofauna
Families
The members of the native and non-native herpetofauna
of the Baja California Peninsula and its adjacent
islands (hereinafter “the Baja California Peninsula”
or simply “the peninsula”) are assigned to 32 families,
including five families of anurans, one of salamanders,
20 of squamates, and six of turtles (Table 3). The total
comprises 51.6% of the 62 families of native and non-
native species found in Mexico. No crocodylian or
caecilian families are represented on the peninsula. Of
the six amphibian families represented on the peninsula,
¢ Arid Tropical Region: 209.0/288.0 = 72.6% 85.7% of the 21 species (Tables 4 and 5) are placed in the
(4-month) families Bufonidae (six species), Hylidae (three), Ranidae
¢ Sierra La Laguna Region: 519.9/581.8 = 89.4% (six), and Plethodontidae (three). Among the 26 reptilian
(4-month) families, 122 of the 151 species (80.8%) are allocated
* Pacific Islands: 30.0/52.2 =57.5% (3-month) in the families Crotaphytidae (five species), Iguanidae
¢ Gulf Islands: 67.4/91.6 = 73.6% (4-month) (nine), Phrynosomatidae (30), Phyllodactylidae (five),
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 73 November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Teiidae (13), Xantusiidae (four), Colubridae (29),
Dipsadidae (seven), Natricidae (four), Viperidae (12),
and Cheloniidae (four).
Page
Genera
WB
Representatives of 64 herpetofaunal genera have been
recorded from the Baja California Peninsula, including
nine genera of anurans, three of caudates, 42 of squamates,
and 10 of turtles (Table 3). These 64 taxa comprise 30.0%
of the 213 genera that occur in Mexico (J. Johnson,
unpub. data, 27 May 2023). Among the amphibians, the
largest numbers of species in Baja California are in the
genera Anaxyrus (five species) and Lithobates (four);
and among reptiles the largest numbers are in the genera
Elgaria (five), Sauromalus (five), Petrosaurus (four),
Phrynosoma (five), Sceloporus (10), Urosaurus (four),
Uta (five), Phyllodactylus (five), Aspidoscelis (13),
Xantusia (four), Lampropeltis (four), Masticophis (five),
Sonora (eight), Hypsiglena (six), Thamnophis (four), and
Crotalus (12).
O59
Species
18.8
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
consists of 172 species, including 18 anurans, three
salamanders, 140 squamates, and 11 turtles (Table
3). The current numbers of native species in these
four groups in Mexico are 272, 161, 913, and 51,
respectively (J. Johnson, unpub. data, 27 May 2023).
The 172 herpetofaunal species known from the Baja
California Peninsula represent 12.3% of the 1,397
species of anurans, salamanders, squamates, and turtles
in the entire country (J. Johnson, unpub. data, 27 May
2023). The only Mexican state that shares a border with
the peninsula is Sonora, and that border is limited in
extent. Rorabaugh and Lemos Espinal (2016) reported
the number of herpetofaunal species in Sonora as 196,
which is 1.1 times the size of the herpetofauna of the
peninsula. This proportion is similar to the relative areas
of the two regions. The surface area of Sonora is 185,430
km? (Rorabaugh and Lemos Espinal 2016) and that of
the Baja California Peninsula is approximately 143,400
km?; thus, Sonora 1s about 1.3 times the size of the entire
peninsula. Therefore, the area/species richness ratios are
828.9 for the peninsula and 946.1 for Sonora.
Fourteen non-native species comprise 8.1% of
total herpetofauna (172 species) of the Baja California
Peninsula, and each of the two states contains nine non-
native species and share four species. This is the highest
number so far in our series of Mexican state herpetofaunas,
with an average of four non-natives. Of the 14 non-native
species in the Peninsula, five are amphibians, and nine
are reptiles (three geckos, two iguanas, one snake, and
three turtles), including two species that were listed
among the 100 worst invasive alien species (Lithobates
catesbeianus and Trachemys scripta) (Lowe et al. 2000).
m); and Gulf Islands, El Barril (50 m). Data were taken from Servicio Meteorologico Nacional at https://smn.conagua.gob.mx (accessed 18 July 2022). Shaded areas indicate the months
Gulf Coast, Loreto (20 m); Magdalena, La Purisima (95 m); Arid Tropical, San José del Cabo (20 m); Sierra La Laguna, San Vicente de la Sierra (650 m); Pacific Islands, Isla Cedros (3
of the rainy season in each region.
Table 2. Monthly and annual precipitation data (in mm) for the 10 geographic regions of the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico. Localities in each region and their elevations are as
follows: California, Santo Tomas (180 m); Lower Colorado Valley, El Mayor (15 m); Baja California Coniferous Forest, Laguna Hanson (1,580 m); Vizcaino, Benito Juarez (55 m); Central
EN
vay
[oe
S
N
S
| Q
S
‘a beara
“N
+ | al
Ne)
mR
Ne)
ia)
2
&
N
—
=
S
oe)
Lower Colorado Valley
Baja California Coniferous
Central Gulf Coast
Magdalena
Sierra La Laguna
Vizcaino
Arid Tropical
Pacific Islands
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 74 November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
Table 3. Composition of the native and non-native herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula and its adjacent islands, Mexico.
| Order Families Genera Species
Anura pe
ee eee
Cat _) JZ |__| "|
Subtotal a 5 |e ee ey]
Testudines
S____*o,____i
Subtotal
Sees
Patterns of Geographic Distribution
We adopted the principal features of the scheme of
geographic regions used by Grismer (2002). However,
we departed from this system to some extent, in that
we recognize the insular regions as separate from the
peninsular regions (Table 4). Thus, we recognize eight
regions on the peninsula and two regions among the
islands (Pacific and Gulf). The distributional data for the
172 species are tabulated in Table 4, and summarized in
Table 5
The total number of species in each of the 10
regions (Table 5) ranges from 27 in the Baja California
Coniferous Forest Region (BCCFR) to 84 in the Gulf
Islands Region (GIR). The average number of regional
species is 56.9. The sizes of the herpetofaunas in six of
the regions (CR, LCVR, VR, CGCR, ATR, and GIR)
are above this average value, and in four (BCCFR, MR,
SLLR, and PIR) they are below it. The respective sizes
of the regional herpetofaunas do not appear to be related
to the relative sizes of the regions themselves, especially
since the largest herpetofauna is found on the islands of
the Gulf Region. We will examine this issue in greater
detail after we present the subsequent analyses.
The amphibian fauna of the peninsula 1s comprised
of only 21 species (18 anurans and three salamanders),
or 12.2% of the total of 172 species. Thus, 87.8% of the
total are reptiles. Relatively few of the 151 species of
reptiles are turtles, 1.e., 11 species (7.3%). Therefore,
most of the herpetofaunal species found in the peninsula
are squamates, viz., 140 species, or 81.4% of the total
of 172. This result is reasonable, given that the general
climate of the peninsula is arid and that much of the
diversity of the herpetofauna is insular in distribution
(see below). Of the 140 squamate species, 83 (59.3%)
are lizards and 57 (40.7%) are snakes. Consequently, the
peninsula is a hotspot for lizards, since the 83 species
comprise 48.3% of the total herpetofauna.
The proportion of the total herpetofauna of 172 species
found in each of the 10 regions ranges from 15.9% (27
species in the BCCFR) to 48.8% (84 in the GIR), which
indicates the limited extent of species distributions on the
peninsula.
The members of the peninsular herpetofauna occur
in from one to 10 regions as follows: one region (78
of 172 species, 45.3%); two regions (16, 9.3%); three
(17, 9.9%); four (10, 5.8%); five (13, 7.6%); six (seven,
4.1%); seven (six, 3.5%); eight (12, 7.0%); nine (7,
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
4.1%), and 10 (six, 3.5%). The mean regional occupancy
is 3.3. This figure lies within the range of 1.6 to 3.7 for
the other states dealt with thus far in the MCS (Alvarado-
Diaz et al. 2013; Mata-Silva et al. 2015: Johnson et al.
2015; Teran-Juarez et al. 2016; Woolrich-Pifia et al.
2016; Nevarez-de los Reyes et al. 2016; Cruz-Saenz et
al. 2017; Gonzalez-Sanchez et al. 2017; Lazcano et al.
2019; Ramirez-Bautista et al. 2020; Torres-Hernandez et
al. 2021; Cruz-Elizalde et al. 2022). Of the 172 species
known from the peninsula, a relatively large proportion
(45.3%) is confined to a single region, which is highly
significant from a conservation perspective (see below).
The number of single-region species ranges from one (in
the MR) to 39 (in the GIR).
The 39 single-region species in the GIR are as
follows, with species endemic to the peninsula indicated
by double asterisks, and non-natives indicated by triple
asterisks:
Crotaphytus insularis**
Coleonyx gypsicolus**
Dipsosaurus catalinensis**
Sauromalus hispidus**
Sauromalus klauberi**
Sauromalus slevini**
Sauromalus varius ***
Petrosaurus slevini**
Sceloporus angustus**
Sceloporus grandaevus**
Sceloporus lineatulus**
Uta encantadae **
Uta lowei**
Uta squamata**
Uta tumidarostra**
Phyllodactylus bugastrolepis**
Phyllodactylus partidus**
Aspidoscelis canus**
Aspidoscelis carmenensis**
Aspidoscelis catalinensis**
Aspidoscelis celeripes**
Aspidoscelis ceralbensis**
Aspidoscelis danheimae**
Aspidoscelis espiritensis**
Aspidoscelis franciscensis**
Aspidoscelis pictus **
Lampropeltis catalinensis**
Masticophis barbouri**
Rhinocheilus etheridgei**
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Table 4. Distribution of amphibians and reptiles in the Baja California Peninsula and its adjacent islands, Mexico, by geographic
province. Abbreviations: CR = California Region; LCVR = Lower Colorado Valley Region; BCCFR = Baja California Coniferous
Forest Region; VR = Vizcaino Region; CGCR = Central Gulf Coast Region; MR = Magdalena Region; ATR = Arid Tropical
Region; SLLR = Sierra La Laguna Region; PIR = Pacific Islands Region; and GIR = Gulf Islands Region. * = species endemic to
Mexico; ** = species endemic to Baja California; *** = non-native.
rr Geographic regions of the Peninsula of Baja California and its adjacent islands Pay
a cr [xeve | sccrr | ve | coce | we [are [site [ri | cir | cccupied
| Anura(I8species) | TE
| Bufonidae(6 species) | | EE
cnc ee a A OG GO OO Oe
| Anaxyruscalifornicus | + TEE
| Anaxyruscognatus TT +! TE
| Anaxyrus punctatus | | + OT dT +t UT +h] +h TE +h UT +h +! Ts
| Anaxyruswoodhousii_ | | +! TT
J Inciliusalvarius TT TP
| Hylidae(3speciesy |
| Pseudacriscadaverina | + | + | dL TT 8
| Pseudacris hypochondriaca | + | + | + [+] + [+] + [| + | + {[ | 9 |
| Smilisca baudinii*** TT
| Pipidae(I species) | S| TE
Be i a i Cia (en (a (amen a) (mn) (me (un)
| Ranidae(6speciesy | |
| Lithobates berlandieri*** | | + TE
| Lithobates catesbeianus*** | + | + | | + | + TT
| Lithobatesforreri*** | | CT CE Ct UT CU +! TCC CC
| Lithobatesyavapaiensis | | + | ET
| Ranavboyli
| Rana draytoni | + [eT
| Scaphiopodidae(2speciesy | | |
| Scaphiopuscouchii_ | S| + OT dE T+! UT +h] +! UT +! UT CUT +!
| Speahammondii | + TT CE TCU
| Caudata(3speciesy | TT
| Plethodontidae(3species) | | |
| Aneidestugubris | + | CUT CUE CC CC
| Batrachosepsmajor_ | + | TL 8
| Ensatinaeschscholtzii_—— | + | OT #2
| Squamata(140 species) | | |
| Anguidae(Sspecies) | | ET
| Elgariacedrosensis** | TT
| Elgaria multicarinaa | + | UT TU
| Elgarianana**™ | TC CE
| Elgariapaucicarinata** || E 8
| Elgaria velazquezi*® | [PP +] +! UT Hh] +! TCU
| Anniellidae(2species) | | |
| Anniella geronimensis** | + | | dL TT 8
| Anniella stebbinsi_ | +! TT
| Bipedidae(I species) | | |
Ra 2 en ean Ee eee ee Eee eee Ee ee eee
| Crotaphytidae(S species) | | ET
| Crotaphytus grismeri** | T+ TP
| Crotaphytusinsularis** | TT
| Crotaphytus vestigium | + | + | dE HT +! UT +h] +! UT CCU CU
ecaribelia copes |i 2 ie ae eee
| Gambeliawislizeni | | +! TT
| Eublepharidae(3 species) | | |
| Coleonyx gypsicolus®* | TE
ee a OO
| Coleonyxvariegatus | + | + TT + | OT + | + T+ T+ | + |
| Gekkonidae(3 species) | | TE
| Gehyramutilata*** TT
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 76 November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
Table 4 (continued). Distribution of amphibians and reptiles in the Baja California Peninsula and its adjacent islands, Mexico, by
geographic province. Abbreviations: CR = California Region; LCVR = Lower Colorado Valley Region; BCCFR = Baja California
Coniferous Forest Region; VR = Vizcaino Region; CGCR = Central Gulf Coast Region; MR = Magdalena Region; ATR = Arid
Tropical Region; SLLR = Sierra La Laguna Region; PIR = Pacific Islands Region; and GIR = Gulf Islands Region. * = species
endemic to Mexico; ** = species endemic to Baja California; *** = non-native.
pmo Geographic regions of the Peninsula of Baja California and its adjacent islands Number
Taxon of regions
|€R | LevR | Becrr | vr | cGcr | MR | ATR | SLLR | PIR | GIR | _ cccupied
| Hemidactylusfrenatus*** | | TT Hh THT +] T+ Tt Ts
| Hemidactylusturcicus*** | + | + TT
| Iguanidae species) | |
| Ctenosaurahemilopha** | TT
| Dipsosauruscatalinensis** | | | TT
| Dipsosaurus dorsalis | | + TT
|Iguanarhinolopha*** TT
| Sauromalusater PE
| Sauromalushispidus** | | |
| Sauromalusklauberi** |
| Sauromalusstevini®*
| Sauromalusvarius®®* PP
ea a RS | (ee ee
| Callisaurus draconoides | +
ere ee a a el Sl
| Petrosaurusrepens** PT Ts
| Petrosaurus stevini®* |} | TT
| Petrosaurus thalassinus** || 8
| Phrynosoma blainvilli | + |
| Phrynosomacerroense** | # | TT
| Phrynosomacoronatum** | | | TT tT TT +} TU
| Phrynosomameallii | | + TT
| Phrynosomaplatyrhinos | | + LT
| Sceloporusangustus®* PE
| Seeloporusgrandaevus®* | | | TT
| Sceloporushunsakeri** | TT 8
| Sceloporuslicki** TE
| Sceloporuslineatulus*® |
| Sceloporusmagister | | + OT TT
| Sceloporus occidentalis | + | TT 8
| Sceloporusorcwti tT HT oH Th tT th
| Sceloporus vandenburgianus | | TH TT
| Sceloporuszosteromus** | + | | dT HT +} UT HT +! T+} Tt Tt 8
| Umanota tt
| Urosaurus gracious TE tT
| Urosaurustahtelai** TT
| Urosaurus nigricaudus | + | + | tT +] +} TP +t] +} T + TP tT +t 8
| Urosaurusornatus TE
| Utaencantadae** |
stiaiowe tee ee ea eT
| Uta squamara®*
| Uta tumidarostra*®
| Phyllodactylidae(S species) | | | TT
| Phyllodactylus bugastrolepis*® | | | TT
| Phyllodactylus nocticolus | + | + | tT th
| Phyllodactylus partidus*® } | TT
| Phyllodactylusunctus** PT
| Phyllodactylusxanti*® | | TT TT 8
| Scincidae(3 species) | | |
| Plestiodongilberti | + | + Tt UT 8
| Plestiodonlagunensis** | | TT
| Plestiodon skiltonianus J] + | | + UT CUT CU
a
+])+]4+]4
wlelelrmofuofefelelela afeloleluafa
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 77 November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Table 4 (continued). Distribution of amphibians and reptiles in the Baja California Peninsula and its adjacent islands, Mexico, by
geographic province. Abbreviations: CR = California Region; LCVR = Lower Colorado Valley Region; BCCFR = Baja California
Coniferous Forest Region; VR = Vizcaino Region; CGCR = Central Gulf Coast Region; MR = Magdalena Region; ATR = Arid
Tropical Region; SLLR = Sierra La Laguna Region; PIR = Pacific Islands Region; and GIR = Gulf Islands Region. * = species
endemic to Mexico; ** = species endemic to Baja California; *** = non-native.
pmo Geographic regions of the Peninsula of Baja California and its adjacent islands Number
Taxon of regions
| cR | icve | acer | vr | cece | me | arr | site | pm | GIR | _cccupied
| Teiidae (13 species) | TT
| Aspidosceliscanus** | TT
| Aspidoscelis carmenensis** | | | EP
| Aspidoscelis catalinensis** | | TE
| Aspidoscelisceleripes** | | | EP
| Aspidoscelis ceralbensis*® | | |
| Aspidoscelis danheimae** | | TE
| Aspidoscelis espiritensis*® | | TE
| Aspidoscelis franciscensis*® | | TE
| Aspidoscelis hyperythrus | + | | TE HT UH! UP +h] + TE + UT +P +] 8
| Aspidoscelistabialis** | * | oT Ee TE
| Aspidoscelis maximus** | TT Et TE tT
| Aspidoscelis pictus** | | | | CT CT
| Aspidoscelistigris J C+ | + {| + | + ] + f+ | ft + | + |g
| Xantusiidae (4 species) | | OT
| Xanwusiagitberti®® |
| Xanwusiahenshawi | *# TT
| Xantusia sherbrookei** | TT
| Xantusiawigginsi | + | + TCE HT +! TUT CE
| Charinidae(Ispeciesy | | |
| Lichanuratrivirgata | + | + | | + { + | +] + | + [+] +] 9 |
| Colubridae 29 species) | | TP
| Arizonaelegans | + | +} OT CET 8
| Arizonapacata** | TT PT
| Bogertophisrosaliae | | + OT CPE tT Hh UP th] +} UT + Tt TT
| Lampropeltis catalinensis** | | TE
| Lampropeltishherrerae** | | | EP
| Lampropeltis multifasciaca | | | + |
| Masticophis aurigulus** | | TE 8
| Masticophis barbouri** | | |
| Masticophis flagellum | | * TE
| Masticophis fuliginosus | * | + | + |+ to + P+] + | + f+ >t] |
| Masticophistareralis | * | + | + P+ ft + P+} ot ft of ot 6 |
| Phyllorhynchus decurtatus | | + TE HT HT +! Te! TU
| Pituophis catenifer | + | + [ + | +] | of ot t+*i of 5 |
| Pituophis insulanus*® | TT
Re rn eS a a ee ae ee ee ee
| Rhinocheilus etheridgei** | | TE
| Rhinocheilusteconei_ | * | + [ot +f 8
| Salvadorahexalepis | + | + | + P+] + P+} + | + f+? +e | |
| Sonoraannuata | | + TE
| Sonoracincta** E+ | + TU TH
| Sonorafasciata** | | OP | tt Th Pt
| Sonoramosaueri®* | | TP eT Hh Ph | +! TU
| Sonora punctatissima®® | | TE
| Sonorasavagei** PT PE
| Sonorastraminea** | TT Et Tt 8
| Sonorasemiannaa | | + OT
| Tantillaplaniceps | + | + [| dT +t] +! UP Lh }hU] +} T+ TC UT cv} Ts
| Trimorphodon lyrophanes, | + | + | + | +] + J+] +{+ t{ ~P+t Ȣ |
ee ee ee ee ee
eluol—l—Ta>ual[uf—
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 78 November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
Table 4 (continued). Distribution of amphibians and reptiles in the Baja California Peninsula and its adjacent islands, Mexico, by
geographic province. Abbreviations: CR = California Region; LCVR = Lower Colorado Valley Region; BCCFR = Baja California
Coniferous Forest Region; VR = Vizcaino Region; CGCR = Central Gulf Coast Region; MR = Magdalena Region; ATR = Arid
Tropical Region; SLLR = Sierra La Laguna Region; PIR = Pacific Islands Region; and GIR = Gulf Islands Region. * = species
endemic to Mexico; ** = species endemic to Baja California; *** = non-native.
us Geographic regions of the Peninsula of Baja California and its adjacent islands ea
a cr | neve | peer | vr | coer | Mm {AR | Stn | PIR} GIR accupied
| Dipsadidae (7 species) | | S|)
a | CV 2
| Hypsiglenacatalinae** | | TE
| Hypsiglenachlorophaea | | + | dE
| Hypsighena gularis** | | TE
| Hypsighena marcosensis** | | | ET
| Hypsighenastevinis® | | + TE + T+ T+ T+! LT +! UT c+] +! Ts
| Elapidae(I species) | |
| Hydrophisplaturus | | + OT ET + T+! TCU T+
| Leptotyphlopidae(2 species) | | | |
ee a) ET (CR (I
| Rena humilis f+ OT +) TP Te + TT T+
| Natricidae (4 species) | S| |
| Thamnophiselegans | S| TE UT
| Thamnophishammondii_ | + | | + oT + T+ UT +h T+! TCU
| Thamnophis marcianus | | TL
| Thamnophisvalidus** | | TE
| Typhlopidae(I species) | | | TT
| Indotyphlops braminus*** | + | tT 8
| Viperidae(I2speciesy | | | CT
| Crotalus angelensis** | | TE
en 5 OO A OO OO
| Crotalus catalinensis** | | TE
| Crotalus cerastes, | | *# OT E
Peretatusizmor IE Weve eile a ee Se ee ee Pe
| Crotalushelleri | + | + UT hUv*®hUdT HUT CCU
| Crotalus lorenzoensis** | | | CE CT
| Crotalus mitcheltii** | | dT EH TH THT +! T+! THT +H 7
| Crotaluspolisi** | | TE CE
| Crotalus pyrrhus tT + LT +t UT hth UT HUT CU
[sCratalisrubers a ae es Are fete es ee tos
| Crotalus thalassoporus** || TE
| Testudines(I1 species) | S| |
| Cheloniidae (4species) | | |
ea cs OO a Oe
-Cheloniamdas _ ff PP
ers | EO
| Dermochelyidae(1 species) | | |
| Dermochelyscoriacea | | oO * OT ET TS
| Emydidae(3species) | | CT
| Actinemys pallida | + | CUT CUE TC
| Trachemysnebulosa** | | dT CE ET UT +H T+! UT +! UT CUS
| Trachemys scripta*** | + | TE
| Kinosternidae (I species) | | |
| Kinosternonintegrum*** | | E
| Testudinidae(Ispeciesy | | |
| Gopherus morafkai_ | | dT
| Trionychidae(I species) | | | Sy SEE a)
| Apatone spiniferav** | | + OT CE
| Total(172speciesy) | | CE
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 79 November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Table 5. Summary of distributional occurrence of herpetofaunal families in the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico, by geographic
region. Abbreviations: CR = California Region; LCVR = Lower Colorado Valley Region; BCCFR = Baja California Coniferous
Forest Region; VR = Vizcaino Region; CGCR = Central Gulf Coast Region; MR = Magdalena Region; ATR = Arid Tropical
Region; SLLR = Sierra La Laguna Region; PIR = Pacific Islands Region; and GIR = Gulf Islands Region.
Number of Distributional occurrence
PButonidee | 6 | 2]os | 1 |2) 3: |i | 31 | «1 |i ft,
pipe es SE (oe (In see | i Lae I
sees —— 0) | |e Oe |e el
aa ar a a a
FScaphiopodine | 2 | 1 | 1 | — | 2] 1 [|i [| 1 | 1 | —| 11
subtom ——s| te] | | *} ld] 7 | cs | 8 | cs | #2 2
EES AE REE = T=
Sipe | > | =m | | | |
[ET 7 Jr (RT (al (C(O (ES ( /
a ET OS ES
aa a | a YE a Pe Fa
a a lS (a A (
(comin I Sele | os Look 2 il a) © [= Ls |
[Eublepharide | 3 | 1 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | «1 | 1/2 _
Fee SE (O(N | | YS en
eee a ee | ee or ee O| oe) oh TlieteN
FPhiynosomatae | 30 | 9 | | 4 | 9 | s | « | | s | 6 | 17
FPhyltodacytidae | 5 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 _
semis | | eR | es | io |
Le a aa ee a PS aR (a a | fa
Ee A AS ee
Tsubo «| ep | ow | le | | oe Pl | le) |)
ESE] TR OG = (SE CC
Fcoubrine | 29 |u| is | 7 | |“ | oe | o | 9 | 9 | «|
a Sa ea ee ee
vipers | 2 [«| «se | 3 [s5|[ 4 [3 [3 [3 | «| 01]
SE LST RC GC
Ppermocneyites | 1 |—-|1 | —[-,—-}.1]14]|-—- |].
BA a ST OO T(E
ite ie | eee ee | aa
oe a a | a as a a (a a eal (| |]
See a
S05 | a | || |
Trot i ise fo | | a [| 7 |» | o | » | o | 2 |
Tsumoat | 12 [ol] «| 7 [es] e« [sa | « | «a |« |» |
Sonora punctatissima** These species are all peninsular endemics, except for one
Sonora savagei** (Sauromalus varius) which was introduced to a small
Hypsiglena catalinae** islet included in the Gulf Island group (Hollingsworth et
Hypsiglena gularis** al. 1997). These species are all either lizards (26 species)
Hypsiglena marcosensis** or snakes (13 species).
Crotalus angelensis** The peninsular region with the next largest number of
Crotalus catalinensis** single-region species is the LCVR, with 19, as follows
Crotalus lorenzoensis** (the number following the species name indicates which
Crotalus polisi** of the distributional categories is involved):
Crotalus thalassoporus**
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 80 November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
Anaxyrus cognatus 3
Anaxyrus woodhousii 3
Incilius alvarius 3
Lithobates berlandieri***2
Lithobates yavapaiensis 3
Crotaphytus grismeri**
Gambelia wislizenii 3
Phrynosoma mceallii 3
Phrynosoma platyrhinos 3
Sceloporus magister 3
Uma notata 3
Urosaurus graciosus 3
Urosaurus ornatus 3
Masticophis flagellum 3
Sonora annulata 3
Sonora semiannulata 3
Hypsiglena chlorophaea 3
Thamnophis marcianus 7
Apalone spinifera***
Of these 19 species, 16 (84.2%) are non-endemics, two
are introduced species, and one is a peninsular endemic.
Of the 16 non-endemic species, all but one are distributed
to the north in the United States; and the single exception
is the garter snake Yhamnophis marcianus, which
occurs from the United States through Mexico, and into
Central America (http://mesoamericanherpetology.com;
accessed 5 June 2022). Crotaphytus grismeri is endemic
to the LCVR, and the two introduced species are from
populations outside of Baja California.
The third-largest group of single-region species
is found in the ATR region, and is comprised of the
following five species:
Smilisca baudinii***
Gehyra mutilata***
Iguana rhinolopha***
Kinosternon integrum***
Gopherus morafkai 3
Interestingly, four of these five species are introduced,
either from elsewhere in Mesoamerica or from outside
of Mesoamerica; and the remaining species also 1s
distributed in the United States.
Three regions contain four single-region species. One
of these regions is the CR, and the species are as follows:
Anaxyrus californicus 3
Xenopus laevis***
Phrynosoma blainvillii 3
Trachemys scripta***
Two of these species are non-native, and the other two
also are distributed in the United States.
The second region with four single-region species is
the BCCER, and the species are as follows:
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
81
Rana boylii 3
Sceloporus vandenburgianus 3
Lampropeltis multifasciata 3
Thamnophis elegans 3
All four of these species also are distributed to the north
in the United States.
In significant contrast to the GIR, the PIR supports
only four single-region species, as follows:
Elgaria cedrosensis**
Elgaria nana**
Lampropeltis herrerae**
Pituophis insulanus**
All of these species are peninsular endemics, like most of
the species 1n the GIR.
Three other regions contain only one single-region
species. One is the MR, and the species involved is:
Xantusia sherbrookei**
This species is a peninsular endemic.
The second region with one single-region species is
the SLLR, and the species is:
Xantusia gilberti**
It also is a peninsular endemic.
The last region with one single-region species is the
VR, and the species is:
Urosaurus lahtelai**
This species is another peninsular endemic.
In summary, of the 78 single-region species found on
the peninsula, 46 are peninsular endemics, 23 are non-
endemics, and nine are non-native species. Only one of
the 10 regions, the CGCR, has no single-region species.
Of the 10 phytogeographic regions on the peninsula, the
GIR is the most significant with regard to conservation
importance, since it contains the largest overall number
of species (84), the largest number of single-region
species (39), and the greatest number of peninsular
endemics (50).
Regional Occupancy and the Coefficient of
Biogeographic Resemblance (CBR)
Another indication of conservation significance involving
the 10 phytogeographic regions is the relative average
regional occupancy (Table 6). This figure is calculated by
recording the number of species occupying each of the
regions | through 10. For example, the CR contains 60
species that occupy regions 1—10 as follows:
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Table 6. Numbers of species, regional occupancy, and average regional occupancy for the geographic regions of the Baja California
Peninsula and adjacent islands, Mexico. See Table 4 for abbreviations.
ie ee [El [a EE ee
PIR
GIR
CR (60 species)
Region | =4
Region 6 = 4
Region 2 = 10
Region 7 = 2
Region 3 = 10
Region 8 = 8
Region 4 =3
Region 9 =7
Region 5 =6
Region 10 = 6
Based on these data, the mean regional occupancy value
for the CR is 5.4 (321/60). The mean regional occupancy
values for the 10 regions range from 4.1 to 6.9 (Table 6),
as follows (in numerical order):
GIR = 4.1
VR=6.2
LEVR= 5.0
PIR = 6.3
BCCFR = 5.2
CGCR = 6.4
CR=5.4
SLLR = 6.4
ATR=5.8
MR =6.9
The regional occupancy values roughly indicate the
relative conservation significance of each of the 10
regions. Thus, the GIR evidently is the most conservation
significant region in the Baja California Peninsula, and
the MR is the least. Thus, even though the GIR is the
region with the highest herpetofaunal figure (84), it
supports the highest degree of single-region species, the
peninsular endemic species.
As in other MCS studies, we constructed a Coefficient
of Biogeographic Resemblance (CBR) matrix in order
to elucidate the similarity relationships among the 10
phytogeographic regions we recognize in the Baja
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
82
321
DD,
141
394
California Peninsula, including its associated islands on
both the Pacific and Gulf sides (Table 7). The greatest
species richness is contained in the Gulf Island Region
(84 species), and the least is in the Baja California
Coniferous Forest Region (27 species). The number of
shared species between each regional pair ranges from
eight between the BCCFR (27 species) and SLLR (41
species), which are relatively small areas located roughly
at opposite ends of the peninsula and contain relatively
small numbers of species, to 54 between the CGCR
(62 species) and ATR (65 species), which are relatively
low-elevation regions containing relatively high species
numbers and are contiguous in the Cape Region of the
peninsula. The mean value of shared species among all
10 regions is 29.9.
The following data show the ranges and means of
shared species (bold in parentheses) for each of the 10
regions, and are arranged according to decreasing species
richness (underlined values) in each region:
GIR (84): 9-41 (30.3)
LCVR (67): 15-43 (30.4)
ATR (65): 10-54 (35.4)
VR (64): 16-48 (37.1)
CGCR (62): 11-54 (37.3)
CR (60): 18-45 (29.3)
MR (51): 11-48 (34.1)
PIR (47): 13-33 (27.4)
SLLR (41): 8-39 (24.9)
BCCER (27): 8-23 (12.9)
The lowest number of shared species in Table 7,
1e., eight between the BCCFR and the SLLR, is
understandable inasmuch as six species occur in all 10
of the phytogeographic regions. These six species are
Uta stansburiana, Lampropeltis californiae, Masticophis
fuliginosus, — Salvadora hexalepis, — Hypsiglena
ochrorhynchus, and Crotalus ruber (Table 4). The other
two species that occur in nine regions are Pseudacris
hypochondriaca and = Trimorphodon _ lyrophanes.
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
Table 7. Pair-wise comparison matrix of Coefficient of Biogeographic Resemblance (CBR) data of the herpetofaunal relationships
for the 10 physiographic regions in the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico. Underlined values = number of species in each region;
upper triangular matrix values = species in common between two regions; and lower triangular matrix values = CBR values. The
formula for this algorithm is: CBR = 2C/N, + N, (Duellman 1990), where C is the number of species in common to both regions,
N, is the number of species in the first region, and N, is the number of species in the second region. See Table 4 for abbreviations.
See Fig. 24 for the UPGMA dendrogram produced from the CBR data.
[era [econ [ve [coe | we [| am | se] me [| or |
Ce | o« [| « | >» | os |» | «| » | ew | » | 4
Coes [oss | @ [os |» | 7 | =» [| » | » [| 7 |»
Pacer [oss | 02 | @ | [|u| u [0 | 3s [| 5 | >
vr | o7s [06 | oss | [| # | «= [| © | 2» [| » | 3
[ame [002 [032 | 022 | 06s [oss | oso [os |» | 0 [ a
re [om [oar [oss] oss [os | om [oss | oas | a7 [28
[oe [oss [0 [ois | oar [oss [oss [oss | oas | 04s [at
Interestingly and perhaps expectedly, only one of the
eight is an amphibian, one is a lizard, and the remaining
Six are snakes.
In addition, the two insular regions positioned on
either side of the peninsula (PIR and GIR) might be
expected to share relatively few species. Their number
of shared species (28) is higher than the number between
the BCCFR and the SLLR (Table 7). These 28 species
include the six occurring in all 10 regions, as well as one
in four regions, two in five regions, one in six regions,
three in seven regions, 10 in eight regions, and five in nine
regions. Notably, no insular endemic species are shared
between these two insular regions. The six peninsular
endemic species found in these two insular regions also
are found on the intervening mainland regions, and in
total are found in five to nine regions.
The CBR values in Table 6 range from 0.16 between
the BCCFR and the GIR to 0.86 between the ATR and
the CGCR. These relationships easily are understood
given that the BCCFR is a “cool mesic area” occupying
the “upper elevations of the northern Sierra Juarez and
southern Sierra San Pedro Martir...” (Grismer, 2002:
12) and the GIR is comprised of the islands in the Gulf
region. In addition, the ATR and the CGCR are two
regions in the southern portion of the peninsula that are
broadly contiguous and overlapping.
UPGMA dendrogram
The UPGMA dendrogram (Fig. 24) indicates that the
two most closely related regions are the adjacent and
overlapping Central Gulf Coast Region (CGCR) and the
Arid Tropical Region (ATR), which are joined at the 0.86
level. These two regions are joined at the 0.82 level with
the Magdalena Region (MR), which is adjacent with both
of the Central Gulf Coast and Arid Tropical Regions for
some distance. These three regions are joined at the 0.74
level with the Vizcaino Region (VR), which is adjacent
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
to both the Central Gulf Coast and Magdalena Regions.
These four regions are joined at the 0.64 level with the
Sierra La Laguna Region (SLLR), which is located in the
southern cape region of Baja California Sur and surrounded
by the Arid Tropical Region. This group of five regions
in the southern portion of the Peninsula is joined to the
remaining regions in the northern portion of the Peninsula
and those in the Pacific Ocean and the Gulf of California
at the 0.52 level. Of the remaining five regions, the regions
most closely allied are the Pacific Islands Region and the
California Region, joined at the 0.62 level. These two
regions are united to the other three regions at the 0.51
level with the Lower Colorado Valley Region (LCVR).
The eight previously mentioned peninsular regions are
joined to the Gulf Islands Region at the 0.44 level. Finally,
and notably, the most distantly related region is the Baja
California Coniferous Forest Region, which 1s joined to all
the other regions at the 0.33 level and is “the southernmost
disjunct and depauperate section of the broader and more
inclusive Sierra Montane Conifer Forest” (Grismer 2002:
11-12). This region has the smallest herpetofauna (27
species) of the 10 regions, and the lowest average number
of species in common (12.9) with the remaining regions
(see above and Table 7).
Distribution Status Categorizations
We used the system developed by Alvarado-Diaz et al.
(2013) to discuss the distribution status of the members
of the Baja California herpetofauna, as was used in the
previous studies in the MCS (see above). The categories
in this system have been somewhat adapted to include
the following: non-endemic, peninsular endemic, and
non-native. The categorizations for each species are
listed in Table 8, and summarized in Table 9.
The species numbers in each of the three distribution
categories, in decreasing order, are: non-endemics, 81
(47.1%); peninsular endemics, 77 (44.8%); and non-
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
oa + & &
; ah é a “
0.9 0.86
0.82
0.8
0.74
0.7
0.64
g 0.62
§
q 0.6
wn
0.52 0.51
0.5
0.44
0.4
0.33
Fig. 24. UPGMA generated dendrogram illustrating the similarity relationships of species richness among the herpetofaunal
components in the 10 geographic regions of the Baja California Peninsula (based on the data in Table 6; Sokal and Michener 1958).
Similarity values were calculated using Duellman’s (1990) Coefficient of Biogeographic Resemblance (CBR).
natives, 14 (8.1%). These distribution categories differ
from those utilized in other MCS studies, inasmuch
as the Baja California Peninsula is almost completely
segmented from the remainder of the country of Mexico,
and biogeographically it is much more closely associated
with the US state of California (Mata-Silva et al., In Press).
Therefore, it is not possible to separate country endemics
from state endemics, as was done in the other MCS studies,
but rather they are recognized here as only a single category,
i.e., the peninsular endemic category (Table 7).
As expected, almost all of the non-endemic species
(74, or 91.4% from a total of 81 species) are categorized
as NE3 or MXUS species (1.e., species occurring in both
Mexico and the United States), according to the categories
established by Wilson et al. (2017). However, one
species (1.2%) is an NE7 or USCA species (Thamnophis
marcianus), 1.€., a Species occurring from the United
States to Central America); and six (7.4%) are NE9 or
OCEA species (one marine snake, Hydrophis platurus,
and five marine turtles, Caretta caretta, Chelonia mydas,
Eretmochelys imbricata, Lepidochelys olivacea, and
Dermochelys coriacea).
The peninsular endemic species amount to 77 and
occupy from one to nine geographic regions (Table
7): one region (46 species, 60.5%); two (four, 5.3%);
three (eight, 10.5%); four (five, 6.6%); five (eight,
10.5%); six (none); seven (two, 2.6%); eight (three,
3.9%); and nine (one, 1.3%). The 46 species confined
to a single geographic region are either mostly limited
to the Pacific Insular Region (four species) or the
Gulf Insular Region (38 species). The following four
species are confined to the Pacific Insular Region:
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Elgaria cedrosensis**
Elgaria nana**
Lampropeltis herrerae**
Pituophis insulanus**
The 38 species limited to the Gulf Insular Region are:
84
Crotaphytus insularis**
Coleonyx gypsicolus**
Dipsosaurus catalinensis**
Sauromalus hispidus**
Sauromalus klauberi**
Sauromalus slevini**
Petrosaurus slevini**
Sceloporus angustus**
Sceloporus grandaevus**
Sceloporus lineatulus**
Uta encantadae **
Uta lowei**
Uta squamata**
Uta tumidarostra**
Phyllodactylus bugastrolepis**
Phyllodactylus partidus**
Aspidoscelis canus**
Aspidoscelis carmenensis**
Aspidoscelis catalinensis**
Aspidoscelis celeripes**
Aspidoscelis ceralbensis**
Aspidoscelis danheimae**
Aspidoscelis espiritensis**
Aspidoscelis franciscensis**
Aspidoscelis pictus **
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
Table 8. Distributional and conservation status measures for members of the herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico.
Distributional status: PE = endemic to Peninsula of Baja California; NE = not endemic to peninsula; and NN = non-native. The
numbers suffixed to the NE category signify the distributional categories developed by Wilson et al. (2017) and implemented in the
taxonomic list at the Mesoamerican Herpetology website (http://mesoamericanherpetology.com), as follows: 3 (species distributed
only in Mexico and the United States); 4 (species found only in Mexico and Central America); 6 (species ranging from Mexico to
South America); 7 (species ranging from the United States to Central America); 8 (species ranging from the United States to South
America); and 9 (Oceanic species). Environmental Vulnerability Score (taken from Wilson et al. 2013a,b): low (L) vulnerability
species (EVS of 3-9); medium (M) vulnerability species (EVS of 10-13); and high (H) vulnerability species (EVS of 14-19). IUCN
categorization: CR = Critically Endangered; EN = Endangered; VU = Vulnerable; NT = Near Threatened; LC = Least Concern;
DD = Data Deficient; and NE = Not Evaluated. SEMARNAT status: A = Threatened; P = Endangered; Pr = Special Protection; and
NS = No Status. See Alvarado-Diaz et al. (2013), Johnson et al. (2015a), and Mata-Silva et al. (2015) for explanations of the EVS,
IUCN, and SEMARNAT rating systems.
Taxon
Anaxyrus boreas
Anaxyrus californicus
Anaxyrus cognatus
Anaxyrus punctatus
Anaxyrus woodhousii
Incilius alvarius
Pseudacris cadaverina
Pseudacris hypochondriaca
Smilisca baudinii***
Xenopus laevis***
Lithobates berlandieri***
Lithobates catesbeianus***
Lithobates forreri***
Lithobates yavapaiensis
Rana boylii
Rana draytonii
Scaphiopus couchii
Spea hammondii
Aneides lugubris
Batrachoseps major
Ensatina eschscholtzii
Elgaria cedrosensis**
Elgaria multicarinata
Elgaria nana**
Elgaria paucicarinata**
Elgaria velazquezi**
Anniella geronimensis**
Anniella stebbinsi
Bipes biporus**
Crotaphytus grismeri**
Crotaphytus insularis**
Crotaphytus vestigium
Gambelia copeii**
Gambelia wislizenii
Coleonyx gypsicolus**
Coleonyx switaki
Coleonyx variegatus
Gehyra mutilata***
Hemidactylus frenatus***
Hemidactylus turcicus***
Ctenosaura hemilopha**
Dipsosaurus catalinensis**
Dipsosaurus dorsalis
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Distributional
status
i
E
E
E
E
E
E
j
3
5)
2
3
3
3
3
3
E
E
Z
Z
Z
Zlzazilzizlz\lz\|Z
E
ich
18)
E
j
3
3
3
3
ES
ES
NE3
2
E
E
P
P
P
P
N
P
P
P
E
EB
E
ie
iE
E
E
re
E
13)
iE
N
N
E
E
3
3
3
3
3
NE3
3
FE.
E
E
N
NN
N
P
P
NE3
Environmental Vulnerability
Category (Score)
———
————
_———
1
—— |
a.
|
——<——=——
85
IUCN
categorization
LC
N
Le
LG
LC
LG,
LC
LG
L
LC
ill
Le
LG
LC
C
LC
IG
LC
LC
N
RG,
LC
LG
LC
C
LC
LG
It
L
E
c
NT
NT
N
L
E
NE
LC
1
C
C
NE
LC
status
P
Pr
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
Pr
T
N
T
T
T
N
a
Se
|
P.
P
P
P
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Table 8 (continued). Distributional and conservation status measures for members of the herpetofauna of the Baja California
Peninsula, Mexico. Distributional status: PE = endemic to Peninsula of Baja California; NE = not endemic to peninsula; and NN
= non-native. The numbers suffixed to the NE category signify the distributional categories developed by Wilson et al. (2017) and
implemented in the taxonomic list at the Mesoamerican Herpetology website (http://mesoamericanherpetology.com), as follows:
3 (species distributed only in Mexico and the United States); 4 (species found only in Mexico and Central America); 6 (species
ranging from Mexico to South America); 7 (species ranging from the United States to Central America); 8 (species ranging from the
United States to South America); and 9 (Oceanic species). Environmental Vulnerability Score (taken from Wilson et al. 2013a,b):
low (L) vulnerability species (EVS of 3-9); medium (M) vulnerability species (EVS of 10-13); and high (H) vulnerability species
(EVS of 14-19). IUCN categorization: CR = Critically Endangered; EN = Endangered; VU = Vulnerable; NT = Near Threatened;
LC = Least Concern; DD = Data Deficient; and NE = Not Evaluated. SEMARNAT status: A = Threatened; P = Endangered; Pr =
Special Protection; and NS = No Status. See Alvarado-Diaz et al. (2013), Johnson et al. (2015a), and Mata-Silva et al. (2015) for
explanations of the EVS, IUCN, and SEMARNAT rating systems.
T Distributional Environmental Vulnerability IUCN SEMARNAT
axon at
status Category (Score) categorization status
Iguana rhinolopha*** ne
M (13) C
cl
[ay Odd
a a
——
aa
a i
Sauromalus ater | NEB.
Sauromalus hispidus** Ea PES |
Sauromalus klauberi** | PECd
Sauromalus slevini** | PECd
[es
[es
rey
[rey
Phrynosona blaimilti | NES Ss M(2)——SS—S
—) a
_——
| NES
| NE
ee
|e PE een ©
ay
a a
—_—
| NES
| NES
Callisaurus draconoides C
Petrosaurus mearnsi s
Petrosaurus repens**
Pr
N
N
N
N
Phrynosoma cerroense** H (14)
M (12)
N H (15)
N M (13)
H (16)
H(17)
H (14)
M (13)
H(17)
N L(9)
Sceloporus occidentalis N M (11)
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Phrynosoma coronatum**
Phrynosoma mcallii
Phrynosoma platyrhinos
Sceloporus angustus**
Sceloporus grandaevus**
Sceloporus hunsakeri**
Sceloporus licki**
Sceloporus lineatulus**
Sceloporus magister
Sceloporus vandenburgianus | NEBL t—“‘é‘aCCAN
[rey
[es
a
a or:
ss
a
Uta lowei™ rey
| NES
La a
==
| NES
LL Eee |
a
[-_*PEe_s|
| NES
ed
Sceloporus zosteromus**
Uma notata
Urosaurus graciosus
Urosaurus lahtelai**
Urosaurus nigricaudus
Urosaurus ornatus N
Uta stansburiana
Uta tumidarostra**
Phyllodactylus bugastrolepis**
Phyllodactylus nocticolus
Phyllodactylus partidus**
Phyllodactylus unctus**
Phyllodactylus xanti**
E
V
N
i
N
L
N
L
L
N
V
V
1
V
N
NN
E3
PE
PE
PE
NN
BS
B3
PE
PE
PE
E3
PE
PE
E3
E3
PE
PE
PE
PE
PE
YE3
YE3
YE3
PE
YE3
YE3
PE
YE3
YE3
PE
PE
PE
ES
PE
PE
E3
PE
PE
PE
Plestiodon gilberti ES
PE
iG,
L
Le
LC
LC
LC
E
©
T
TAS
C
LC
Le
LG
LC
C
LC
LG
LC
LG.
il
LG
LC
KG,
LC
U
U
C
Le
U
LC
LG,
Le
it
LC
LC
LC
Plestiodon lagunensis**
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 86 November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
Table 8 (continued). Distributional and conservation status measures for members of the herpetofauna of the Baja California
Peninsula, Mexico. Distributional status: PE = endemic to Peninsula of Baja California; NE = not endemic to peninsula; and NN
= non-native. The numbers suffixed to the NE category signify the distributional categories developed by Wilson et al. (2017) and
implemented in the taxonomic list at the Mesoamerican Herpetology website (http://mesoamericanherpetology.com), as follows:
3 (species distributed only in Mexico and the United States); 4 (species found only in Mexico and Central America); 6 (species
ranging from Mexico to South America); 7 (species ranging from the United States to Central America); 8 (species ranging from the
United States to South America); and 9 (Oceanic species). Environmental Vulnerability Score (taken from Wilson et al. 2013a,b):
low (L) vulnerability species (EVS of 3-9); medium (M) vulnerability species (EVS of 10—13); and high (H) vulnerability species
(EVS of 14-19). IUCN categorization: CR = Critically Endangered; EN = Endangered; VU = Vulnerable; NT = Near Threatened;
LC = Least Concern; DD = Data Deficient; and NE = Not Evaluated. SEMARNAT status: A = Threatened; P = Endangered; Pr =
Special Protection; and NS = No Status. See Alvarado-Diaz et al. (2013), Johnson et al. (2015a), and Mata-Silva et al. (2015) for
explanations of the EVS, IUCN, and SEMARNAT rating systems.
Distributional Environmental Vulnerability IUCN
status Category (Score) categorization status
N NS
P
Taxon
Plestiodon skiltonianus
Aspidoscelis canus**
Aspidoscelis carmenensis**
Aspidoscelis catalinensis**
Aspidoscelis celeripes**
Aspidoscelis ceralbensis**
Aspidoscelis danheimae**
Aspidoscelis espiritensis**
Aspidoscelis franciscensis**
Aspidoscelis hyperythrus N
Aspidoscelis labialis**
Aspidoscelis maximus**
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
te
P
Aspidoscelis pictus**
Aspidoscelis tigris
P
Xantusia gilberti**
Xantusia henshawi
i
Xantusia sherbrookei**
Xantusia wigginsi
Lichanura trivirgata
Arizona elegans
Arizona pacata** P
Bogertophis rosaliae
Lampropeltis californiae
Lampropeltis catalinensis** P
Lampropeltis herrerae** ly
Lampropeltis multifasciata N
Masticophis aurigulus** P
Pp.
Masticophis barbouri**
Masticophis flagellum
Masticophis fuliginosus
Masticophis lateralis
Phyllorhynchus decurtatus
Pituophis catenifer
Le
Le
LG
VU
Le
LC
Le
LC
LC
Le
VU
NE
Le
Le
NE
LC
NE
NE
Le.
LC
LC
IG
Le’
Le
NE
Le.
LC
NE
LC
Le.
LC
Pituophis insulanus** FP LG
Pituophis vertebralis** P Ee
Rhinocheilus etheridgei** ‘ig
Rhinocheilus lecontei Le
KG
Salvadora hexalepis
N
N
N
Sonora annulata
N
es
Sonora cincta**
es
Sonora fasciata**
es
P
P
E3
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E3
E
E
E
E3
E
E3
E
E3
E3
E
E3
E3
E
E
E3
E
E
E3
E3
E3
E3
E3
E
E
E
E3
E3
E3
E3
E
Sonora mosaueri** E
E
P
Z
™
Sonora punctatissima**
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 87 November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Table 8 (continued). Distributional and conservation status measures for members of the herpetofauna of the Baja California
Peninsula, Mexico. Distributional status: PE = endemic to Peninsula of Baja California; NE = not endemic to peninsula; and NN
= non-native. The numbers suffixed to the NE category signify the distributional categories developed by Wilson et al. (2017) and
implemented in the taxonomic list at the Mesoamerican Herpetology website (http://mesoamericanherpetology.com), as follows:
3 (species distributed only in Mexico and the United States); 4 (species found only in Mexico and Central America); 6 (species
ranging from Mexico to South America); 7 (species ranging from the United States to Central America); 8 (species ranging from the
United States to South America); and 9 (Oceanic species). Environmental Vulnerability Score (taken from Wilson et al. 2013a,b):
low (L) vulnerability species (EVS of 3-9); medium (M) vulnerability species (EVS of 10-13); and high (H) vulnerability species
(EVS of 14-19). IUCN categorization: CR = Critically Endangered; EN = Endangered; VU = Vulnerable; NT = Near Threatened;
LC = Least Concern; DD = Data Deficient; and NE = Not Evaluated. SEMARNAT status: A = Threatened; P = Endangered; Pr =
Special Protection; and NS = No Status. See Alvarado-Diaz et al. (2013), Johnson et al. (2015a), and Mata-Silva et al. (2015) for
explanations of the EVS, IUCN, and SEMARNAT rating systems.
Taxon
Sonora savagei**
Sonora straminea**
Sonora semiannulata
Tantilla planiceps
Trimorphodon lyrophanes
Diadophis punctatus
Hypsiglena catalinae**
Hypsiglena chlorophaea
Hypsiglena gularis**
Hypsiglena marcosensis**
Hypsiglena ochrorhynchus
Hypsiglena slevini**
Hydrophis platurus
Rena boettgeri**
Rena humilis
Thamnophis elegans
Thamnophis hammondii
Thamnophis marcianus
Thamnophis validus**
Indotyphlops braminus***
Crotalus angelensis**
Crotalus atrox
Crotalus catalinensis**
Crotalus cerastes
Crotalus enyo**
Crotalus helleri
Crotalus lorenzoensis**
Crotalus mitchellii**
Crotalus polisi**
Crotalus pyrrhus
Crotalus ruber
Crotalus thalassoporus**
Caretta caretta
Chelonia mydas
Eretmochelys imbricata
Lepidochelys olivacea
Dermochelys coriacea
Actinemys pallida
Trachemys nebulosa**
Trachemys scripta***
Kinosternon integrum***
Gopherus morafkai
Apalone spinifera***
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Distributional
status
P
P
P
P
FE
E
i
E
E
E
E
E
j
E
E
NN
E
P
P
P
P
P
NE3
:
E
E
E
E
E
E
j
E
E
P
E
E
E3
3
3
3
3
E
E
3
E
9
EB
3
3
3
7
Lo)
lel
3
ie)
3
E
BS
EB
FE
E
3
E
9
9
9
9
9
3
E
3
NN
NN
NE
NN
Environmental Vulnerability
Category (Score)
——_ Sl
a
IUCN
categorization
_—— |
=
——<——_
=
=.
ss
_———
LC
NE
IG
LC
LG.
Le
NE
LC
LC
NE
NE
LC,
LC
NE
LC
LC
L¢
LC
Le,
Le
LC
CR
Le
Le
NE
1
LC
NE
NE
iG
NE
LG.
EN
CR
VU
CR
VU
NE
NE
88
SEMARNAT
status
Pr
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
Table 9. Summary of the distributional status data for the herpetofaunal families in the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico.
Number Distributional status
Family of
species Non-endemic (NE) Peninsular Endemic (CE) Non-native (NN)
| SSS OL. ES eee
ee a ee eee ee eae se
er ipidac FE |) a ey ee See easy
wep Rattidaes |e =e ee | ____*
| Scaphiopodidae | 2
| Subtotal |
| Plethodontidae [388
Le oa | ee = ea eee
SSS SS SSS SSS SSS SSS SSS SSS
TE i i ee EEE EE eee
) es Aniniellidaes eg
—— biped ee ee
| Crotaphytidae |S 8
| Eublepharidae | 3
| Gekkonidae |
| dguanidae |
| Phrynosomatidae | 30
| Phyllodactylidae |S
| Scincidae |
le Tiida
| Xantusiidae | AT
| Subtotal | 8B
a a (a | | | |
| Colubridae |S
| Dipsadidae |
jElapidags ee
| Leptotyphlopidae | 2
a Natiicidae = | PA eee
| Typhlopidae
PS eiperidies ie eS
| helontidae S| Se | Ease
| Dermochelyidac | NP
| Kinosternidae |S
| Testudinidae |e
| irionvatiidacs ef >=Es
Lea ee a SE
Lampropeltis catalinensis** Crotalus polisi**
Masticophis barbouri** Crotalus thalassoporus**
Rhinocheilus etheridgei**
Sonora punctatissima** The 14 non-native species include five anurans (Smilisca
Sonora savagei** baudinii, Xenopus laevis, Lithobates berlandieri, L.
Hypsiglena catalinae** catesbeianus, and L. forreri), five lizards (Gehyra
Hypsiglena gularis** mutilata, Hemidactylus frenatus, H. turcicus, Iguana
Hypsiglena marcosensis** rhinolopha, and Sauromalus varius), one snake
Crotalus angelensis** (Undotyphlops braminus), and three turtles (Trachemys
Crotalus catalinensis** scripta, Kinosternon integrum, and Apalone spinifera).
Crotalus lorenzoensis** The most widespread of these introduced species in
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 89 November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Mexico are Hemidactylus frenatus and Indotyphlops
braminus (Gonzalez-Sanchez et al. 2021), and the most
widely distributed of these species in the Baja California
peninsula 1s Hemidactylus frenatus (Table 4).
Principal Environmental Threats
The main threat to the planet’s biodiversity is the
combination of human population growth and _ the
exploitation of natural resources. The human population
requires resources to survive and grow, and _ these
resources often are removed from the environment in
unsustainable ways. This problem becomes larger as the
human population grows. As threats to biodiversity are
occurring worldwide, Mexico also is subject to many of
these threats (Santos-Barrera et al. 2021), and the Baja
California Peninsula is no exception. In this section
we highlight the most significant problems we believe
are affecting the conservation of amphibian and reptile
populations in the Baya California Peninsula.
Land conversion and habitat loss. In general, this
threat is the major reason for biodiversity loss (Lecleére
et al. 2020; Bellard et al. 2022), and specifically for
amphibians and reptiles (Wake 1991; Gibbons et
al. 2000; Bohm et al. 2013). In the Baja California
Peninsula, a large part of this threat occurs mainly in
coastal areas where the vegetation has been cleared,
and the habitat has been lost as a result of tourism and
housing development. For example, Aspidoscelis tigris
and Dipsosaurus dorsalis were affected by habitat loss
in the coastal sand dunes of San Felipe (Gatica-Colima
1998). This activity is more common in the Gulf of
California due to the attractiveness of its beaches. Many
of these mega-developments involve the clearing of large
sections of natural land for the construction of buildings,
golf courses, and marinas, which alter both the terrestrial
and marine habitats, as well as coastal dunes and riparian
areas (Rodriguez-Revelo et al. 2014b).
In other regions, the expansion of agricultural areas
also affects a large part of the habitats of many species
throughout the peninsula (Fig. 25). Most of these crops
are monocultures that serve as an ecological trap for
organisms inhabiting nearby natural semiarid habitats
(Rotem et al. 2013). One of the areas most affected by this
activity is the Santo Domingo Valley in the Magdalena
region of Baja California Sur. This area covers just over
260,000 ha and includes many isolated fragments of
native vegetation that still contain native reptile species;
nevertheless, extirpations have been detected, such as
that of Urosaurus nigricaudus (Munguia-Vega et al.
2013). Perhaps this also is the case with other species of
lizards and snakes in such agricultural areas as the Valley
of Mexicali in northeastern Baja California, which covers
about 280,000 ha. Another agricultural area with constant
expansion is that between Colonet and San Quintin in
northwestern Baja California, which has affected the
coastal scrub vegetation and dune areas (Vanderplank
%
Fig. 25. Cleared land used for agriculture in San Quintin. This area was the habitat of Anniella geronimensis, and now is used
by Driscoll’s to grow berries for export to the USA. The Riveroll Volcano is evident in the background, which is the habitat
of Batrachoseps major and Ensatina schscholtzii. Agriculture and rock/sand mining activities continue to threaten these unique
populations of salamanders. Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
et al. 2014a), thereby causing a reduction in the habitat
of the endemic lizard Anniella geronimensis, as well as
other endemic species (e.g., Aspidoscelis labialis and
Sceloporus zosteromus).
Mining concessions along the peninsula also imply
the destruction of natural habitat, the excessive use of
water, and habitat fragmentation due to the construction
of access roads. In a short period between 2009 and
2010, 141 mining concessions were granted in the state
of Baja California Sur, at least five of which are located
in the Cape Region, which affected nearly 50,000 ha of
habitat for many reptile species endemic to this region
(Galina-Tessaro et al. 2015). Other mining activities,
such as the extraction of sand from riparian areas that is
used for construction and exported to the United States,
have affected the habitat of the Arroyo Toad (Anaxyrus
californicus) and the California Red-legged Frog (Rana
draytonii) in northwestern Baja California; and both
species are included in Mexico’s list of threatened species
(Lovich et al. 2009).
Water diversion and overuse. Aquatic habitats are
threatened by the alteration of their physical or biotic
structures based on the various ways humans use water
supplies and the adjacent habitats (Figs. 26-28). The
channelization of streams and excessive pumping of
groundwater and surface water have the greatest effects
on the aquatic habitats and their associated species
(Jennings and Hayes 1994). Due to the aridity of the
peninsula and the declining precipitation, evidently there
is a diminution and a lack of recharge of the aquifers;
therefore, the excessive use of water represents a strong
threat to such freshwater species as amphibians and
reptiles (e.g., Thamnophis and Actinemys). Notably,
the extraction of water for domestic and agricultural
consumption has affected the hydrology of the basins in
northwestern Baja California. The excessive use of water
for irrigation in agricultural areas is reducing the water
levels in streams, and also causing the loss of ponds
and areas with the historical presence of species such as
Anaxyrus californicus, Rana draytonii, and Actinemys
pallida (Peralta-Garcia et al. 2016; Valdez-Villavicencio
et al., In Press). In most of the watersheds the surface
water no longer occurs near the coast, and in some
cases it is up to 20 km inland, due to the presence of a
large number of pumps used to extract the groundwater
and a network of surface pipes used to distribute water
throughout the agricultural region between Colonet and
San Quintin.
Baja California Sur is no exception, as many of the
aquifers there are overexploited, and with the scarcity
of rainfall, the recharge of the aquifers is insufficient
(Carrillo-Guerrero 2010; Troyo-Diéguez et al. 2010).
Large amounts of water are destined for agricultural use.
For example, 78% of the state’s water is destined for
agricultural use and 15% for public establishments such
as shopping areas and hotel complexes, whose numbers
keep increasing with each passing year (Graciano 2013).
This situation has caused a water deficit of 54% in the
state’s aquifers (DOF 2020). Therefore, many of the
streams and small oases no longer have the surface water
which 1s vital for the survival of amphibians and reptiles
(e.g., Trachemys nebulosa and Thamnophis hammondii).
Invasive species. Introduced species are considered
one of the main causes of amphibian and reptile
Fig. 26. An aerial image of San Quintin agricultural valley, which surrounds Arroyo Santo Domingo. A large patch of wetland was
present at the mouth of the stream, but became dry. Agricultural activities promote habitat loss through land clearing and water
overextraction, which leads to soil salinization. Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
91
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Fig. 27. Arroyo Santo Domingo, Baja California. A. Kilometers of water pipelines are used along Arroyo Santo Domingo to irrigate
crops in the San Quintin valley; B. A well at Arroyo Santo Domingo. INEGI catalogued this arroyo as overexploited, but water
extraction activities continue. Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
Fig. 28. In the San Quintin Valley, fields are irrigated for agriculture. This area was the habitat of Anniella geronimensis and
Aspidoscelis labialis, both endemic species in this area. Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
declines (Blackburn et al. 2019; Cox et al. 2022),
especially on island systems where invasive species are
the main threat (Aguirre-Mufioz et al. 2016). Many of
the alien species affect native species (Figs. 29-30), not
only through direct predation, but also by competing
for prey, modifying/eliminating habitat, and spreading
disease (Holland 1994; Kats and Ferrer 2003; Bury et
al 2012):
Many species of mammals have been introduced on
the islands associated with the Baja California Peninsula,
some of which contribute to habitat loss and modification
(e.g., goats), competition, and predation (e.g., rats, cats,
and dogs). Cats prey directly on lizards and snakes,
and could be their main threat on islands (Arnaud et al.
2008). Fortunately, many of these invasive species have
been eradicated from several of these islands (Aguirre-
Mufioz et al. 2016), but they still are present on some
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
of the islands, which represents a threat to the unique
species in these island habitats.
In the northwestern region of the peninsula, a low
abundance of amphibians, and the absence of Rana
draytonii in particular, have been reported at sites where
exotic species are present (Peralta-Garcia et al. 2016).
The same situation has been observed with the pond turtle
Actinemys pallida in the presence of Bullfrogs (Lithobates
catesbeianus,; Valdez-Villavicencio et al., In Press).
This same phenomenon occurs in many oases along the
peninsula where various introduced species (e.g., Tilapia
zilli, Procambarus clarkii, and L. catesbeianus) are found,
which might be affecting the amphibian populations (Luja
et al. 2016). In northeastern Baja California, the native
anurans Incilius alvarius and Lithobates yavapaiensis
perhaps have been extirpated due to the introductions of
the Bullfrog and various fish species (Grismer 2002).
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
¢ : eg 4 3 - 3 ‘:
. at oe C yee
— ia ott
4
=
Fig. 29. Invasive Bullfrogs (Lithobates catesbeianus) at Valle de
~ &
Guadalupe, Baja California. This species has dispersed throughout
this valley due to growth in the wine industry, which usually includes reservoirs for irrigation or attractions for customers. Sunfish
and Largemouth Bass have been released into these reservoirs, which threaten native amphibians and reptiles. Photo by Andrea
Navarro-Tiznado.
—
he
y.
Fig. 30. An adult Hypsiglena ochrorhynchus was found in the stomach of a Bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) at Rancho Madrigal,
Ensenada, Baja California. Efforts to eradicate these frogs are being made at this site. Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
In this same region, a reduction in the diversity of
amphibian and reptile species also has been reported
in disturbed sites of the Colorado River that have been
invaded by exotic vegetation (Valdez-Villavicencio et
al. 2021). Introduced plants can have serious negative
effects on the environment and represent another threat
to the survival of reptiles, since they can significantly
reduce the richness and abundance of the insects that
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
are the main food for many species of reptiles (Valentine
et al. 2007; Schirmel et al. 2016). For example, the
legless lizard Anniella stebbinsi appears to be affected
by the invasion of ice plants (Carpobrotus edulis and
Mesembryanthemum crystallinum) in the coastal dunes
of northwestern Baja California (Manrriquez-Gomez
et al. 2021). The same situation occurs in coastal
dunes between San Quintin and El Socorro, where the
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Fig. 31. Livestock grazing at La Grulla, Sierra San Pedro Martir, Baja California, a high-elevation meadow at 2,250 m asl. The lack
of livestock management affects local herpetofaunal populations, including those of Rana draytonii, Anaxyrus californicus, and
Thamnophis elegans. Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
Fig. 32. Livestock wandering along the side of Arroyo Valladares, Baja California. Photo by Anny P
abundance of Anniella geronimensis has been observed
to be much lower in patches with ice plants, when
compared to patches of native vegetation (APG and
JHVV, unpub. data).
Invasive plants on island systems also might be
affecting the survival of amphibians and reptiles. In recent
years, the increase of non-native grass species has been
observed on some Pacific islands. Introduced grasses
have been shown to alter the structure and function of
ecosystems, thereby causing negative impacts on native
species (Garcia and Clusella-Trullas 2019), since they
can reduce the availability of microhabitats, and also
alter the thermal quality of the habitat (Carter et al. 2015;
Schlesinger et al. 2020; Lara-Reséndiz et al. 2022). For
example, a low abundance of Lampropeltis herrerae has
been observed on Todos Santos Island, perhaps caused by
introduced grasses (Pampa-Ramirez 2021), in addition
to a low abundance of lizards.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
—
ne
eralta-Garcia.
In other habitats such as oases, introduced plants
represent a serious threat. The Rubber Vine (Cryptostegia
grandiflora) is an aggressive invasive plant that has been
introduced into at least 22 oases in Baja California Sur,
and likely is affecting amphibians and reptiles associated
with these unique habitats (Valentine et al. 2007:
Rodriguez-Estrella et al. 2010).
Livestock grazing. Livestock production is an important
part of the economies of both states in the Baja California
Peninsula, as the percentage of land use for cattle is over
50% (SEMARNAT 2003). The effects of ranching and
livestock on wildlife need to be better documented (but
see Figs. 31-32). However, overgrazing likely has led to
a major problem in the meadows of northwestern Baja
California, causing their disappearance and impacting
riparian wildlife species, including amphibians such as
Rana draytonii and Anaxyrus californicus (Mellink and
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
ees
Fig. 33. A Southwestern Pond Turtle (Actinemys pallida) trampled
Anny Peralta-Garcia.
Contreras 2014; Peralta-Garcia et al. 2016). Remnant
meadows might be affected by the water quality changes
associated with grazing, leading to the demise of local
amphibian populations (Smalling et al. 2021). In Baja
California Sur, the tropical deciduous forest has been
overgrazed for over 200 years; and during this time, grazing
has changed the vegetational structure and composition of
the Cape Region, thus affecting wildlife through habitat
loss (Jaramillo 1994; Arriaga 2006). In general, habitats
with a relatively complex structures support more diverse
animal communities than those with simple structures, due
to the provision of a greater range of available niches that
can be exploited (Pianka 1966).
Livestock grazing has been associated with a
lower density and structure of the vegetation and seed
production, soil compaction, the lowering of water
filtration, increased erosion, as well as modification
of the available oxygen, chemical composition,
microorganisms, and fertility (Mellink and Contreras
2014; Jofré and Reading 2012). In the Baja California
Peninsula, the abundance of three species of frogs and
four species of lizards was lower in grazed areas than in
ungrazed areas (Arguelles-Méndez et al. 1996; Romero-
Schmidt et al. 1994; Romero-Schmidt and Ortega-Rubio
1999). The differences were attributed to a reduction in
the protective cover from predators and food availability
for insects. Furthermore, cattle might have a direct effect
by disturbing individuals or even crushing them as they
wander in their habitat. Cattle grazing had a detrimental
effect on lizard populations. For example, Busack
and Bury (1974) found negative effects on Gambelia
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
95
oY * f
by cattle along Arroyo San Vicente, Baja California. Photo by
wislizenii and Phrynosoma platyrhinos (two species
found in Baja California), because grazing had altered
their preferred habitats and the availability of food.
Dead individuals of Actinemys pallida have been
found on stream banks (Fig. 33), showing signs of
being crushed by livestock (APG and JHVV, pers.
obs.). Grazing and trampling led to an overall decline in
reptile population abundance, changes in reptile species
composition, and reduced reptile diversity in the majority
of the habitat types where it has been studied (Jofré
and Reading 2012). However, more research is needed
to understand the effect of grazing on amphibians and
reptiles in the Baja California Peninsula.
Illegal trade. Currently, many species of amphibians and
reptiles that are rare or endemic, or that inhabit particular
areas such as islands, are attractive to collectors and often
are illegally collected and traded, which can lead to over-
collecting, consequently affecting their survival (Auliya
et al. 2016; Marshall et al. 2020). The herpetofauna of
the Baja California Peninsula is known to be subject to
the illegal collecting and trafficking of species (Mellink
1995; Grismer 2002). Many insular endemic species are
subject to illegal collection and trade. The Baja California
associated islands harbor numerous endemic species
that are subject to the pet trade, especially rattlesnakes
(Pliego-Sanchez et al. 2021) and the Todos Santos Island
Kingsnake (Lampropeltis herrerae). Collectors turning
over rocks and snake traps have been reported on Isla
Todos Santos (Mellink 1995). In 2007, APG and JHVV
also found several abandoned traps, and recently Pampa-
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Fig. 34. Car and motorcycle tracks seen in the vicinity of turtle nesting sites at Punta Arena, north of Cabo Pulmo, Baja California
Sur. These activities remain a common practice along these areas. Photo by Alan Harper.
Ramirez (2021) reported finding three more abandoned
traps. However, we do not know whether this species
presently continues to be attractive for illegal collection.
The search for and illegal collection of reptiles also has led
to the degradation of the habitat of rock-dwelling species
(Goode et al. 2004, 2005), such as the rocky habitat of
the snakes Lampropeltis multifasciata and Lichanura
trivirgata, and rock-dwelling lizards (e.g., Petrosaurus
and Sauromalus). Reports of the illegal removal of large
numbers of the endemic Petrosaurus thalassinus in the
Cape Region of Baja California Sur have been published
(Grismer 2002; Lovich et al. 2009).
Recently, we have seen social media posts of people
purchasing individuals of Bipes biporus and Phrynosoma
species from Baja California. This practice encourages
the local people to illegally (sometimes unknowingly)
collect reptile species to sell to these types of buyers.
Off-road activities. Off-road vehicle driving (Figs.
34-35) is a common outdoor recreational activity in the
Baja California Peninsula (Gaeta-Verdin 2020). The use
of these types of vehicles (quads, buggies, racers, etc.)
has increased significantly in recent years, but there are
few regulations on how and where these recreational
activities can be undertaken. Today, these activities
are a common tourist attraction along the coasts of the
peninsula, where rental services for these vehicles are
offered. Few studies in Baja California have evaluated
whether these activities affect biodiversity, but studies
elsewhere have shown the negative effects on reptiles
in desert habitats due to the loss of vegetational cover,
a reduction in the abundance of invertebrates, and the
disturbance of the daily activities of reptiles (Busack
and Bury 1974; Bury et al. 1977). One example is the
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
alteration of the coastal dunes in northwestern Baja
California (El Descanso dunes, and La Lagunita in
Ensenada), where the vegetation has been lost completely
due to the use of all-terrain vehicles (Rodriguez-Revelo
et al. 2014a), and it surely has affected species such as
Anniella stebbinsii and Sceloporus zosteromus. These
types of activities also could be affecting other species,
including Phrynosoma mcallii, Uma notata, and Crotalus
cerastes (included in NOM-059), as they may be run
over by off-road vehicles passing through Laguna Salada
or the Cuervitos-Algodones dunes in Mexicali. The use
of these vehicles in riparian areas also is a common
activity, sometimes directly in the streambeds, where
they affect freshwater turtles and tadpoles or amphibian
egg masses. Baja California Sur is no exception. Due to
the increasing amount of tourism, numerous places now
offer these types of recreational activities, and mainly
in coastal areas. Sea turtle nesting areas also have been
affected by tourists or local people who do not respect the
posted signs, and use motorcycles and cars to enter the
sand dunes where turtles nest (Vanderplank et al. 2014b).
High-speed off-road vehicle races are held in Baja
California each year (e.g., Baja 1,000, 500, 400, and
250 mile races). Nearly 300 vehicles participate in the
Baja 1,000 and travel along the dirt roads and trails along
the peninsula, and even through natural protected areas.
These vehicles likely are causing irreparable damage
to the arid and semi-arid environments of the Baja
California peninsula, since constant traffic compacts
the soil, destroys the vegetation, and promotes erosion
(Gaeta-Verdin 2020). Given the characteristics of these
vehicles, Scaphiopus couchii and Spea hammondii
burrows can be susceptible to the disturbance caused by
the vehicles that generate noise and produce vibrations
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
Fig. 35. Well-traveled road along a streambed at Cafion El Alamo, Arroyo Las Palmas, Baja California. Several species of amphibians
and reptiles, including Southwestern Pond Turtles (Actinemys pallida), inhabit this stream. Photo by Anny Peralta-Garcia.
similar to rain, inducing their emergence under highly
unfavorable conditions (hot and dry) that would be fatal
for adults (Jennings and Hayes 1994). Another problem
with this activity is that the routes are not permanent,
and every year they change and affect different areas.
The traffic caused by local vehicles also is a problem, as
thousands of spectators also travel along the dirt roads to
watch the races at different points, and they surely run
over a large number of lizards and snakes, in addition
to the problem of improperly disposing of their garbage
(Gaeta- Verdin 2020).
Infectious diseases. Infectious diseases are considered
one of the main threats to amphibians worldwide, resulting
in the declines and local extinctions of many species. One
of the main diseases is chytridiomycosis, an infectious
disease caused by the pathogenic fungi Batrachochytrium
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
dendrobatidis and B. salamandrivorans (Skerratt et al.
2007; Adams et al. 2022). For reptiles, some infectious
diseases also have emerged and affected wild populations
through disease transmission, such as the one in snakes
caused by the fungus Ophidiomyces ophiodiicola, and the
turtle shell disease caused by Emydomyces testavorans
(Haynes et al. 2021; Lambert et al. 2021).
Only a few studies in the Baja California Peninsula
have investigated diseases in amphibians, and they
have focused on B. dendrobatidis (Bd). Bd has been
recorded in both states, with museum records detecting
the pathogen as early as 1932 in Baja California (Adams
et al. 2022). In the northern state, this fungus has been
detected in Anaxyrus californicus, A. boreas, Pseudacris
cadaverina, P. hypochondriaca, Rana draytonii, and
the exotic Lithobates catesbeianus, with only Xenopus
laevis testing negative (Peralta-Garcia et al. 2018). In
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Baja California Sur, Bd also has been detected in L.
catesbeianus and P. hypochondriaca (Luja et al. 2012).
Bd-positive sites occurred at elevations ranging from sea
level to 2,070 m asl.
The presence of the non-native American Bullfrog
(Lithobates catesbeianus), a competent Bd vector and
reservoir host (Schloegel et al. 2012; Adams et al. 2017),
has been associated with higher Bd prevalence in native
anurans in Baja California (Luja et al. 2012). Increased
Bd prevalence in Baja California also has been observed
at higher elevations, and with greater remoteness from
urban areas and agricultural land (Peralta-Garcia et
al. 2018). Adams et al. (2022) found an overall Bd
prevalence of 68%, with species being an important
predictor of pathogen prevalence and burden (load) both
across and within sites. Species distribution models of Bd
predict high suitability for the pathogen in northwestern
Baja California, based on environmental factors (Bolom-
Huet et al. 2019). Infections higher than >10,000 ZE
(where ZE is a measure of infection intensity) have
been observed in Baja California frogs, particularly in
A. boreas and R. draytonii, with a higher prevalence at
higher elevation sites (Peralta-Garcia et al. 2018; Adams
et al. 2022), prompting the need for further investigations
of Bd in this region.
No diseases have been detected for reptiles, but
follow-up studies are important because some diseases
have been detected in snakes and turtles in the
neighboring state of California (Haynes et al. 2021;
Lambert et al. 2021).
Climate change. Climate change has become one of the
main threats to biodiversity (Pereira et al. 2010; Bellard et
al. 2012). Some of the main effects of climate change are
changes in temperatures that can accelerate the loss and
degradation of habitat, promote changes in the abundance
and structure of communities, and alter the distribution
of species, in addition to accelerating the extinction of
species at different scales (Bellard et al. 2012). In the
case of reptiles, many studies have examined the impact
of climate change and indicate severe effects on these
organisms (Sinervo et al. 2010; Meiri et al. 2013).
Climate change represents a threat for most reptiles since
it can reduce their hours of activity, thereby causing the
alterations in many of their physiological processes,
reproduction, and feeding (Sinervo et al. 2010).
In the Baja California Peninsula, species with
restricted distributions or species with fossorial habits
are the ones that primarily will be affected. For example,
climate change effect models show that Anniella
geronimensis and Bipes biporus would experience
negative impacts on their distributions (Lara-Reséndiz
et al. 2020). Conversely, some thermophilic and widely
distributed species (e.g., Dipsosaurus dorsalis) might not
be as threatened by climate change (Lara-Reséndiz et al.
2019). Fossorial species (such as Anniella geronimensis
and Bipes biporus) may also be impacted under projected
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
climate change scenarios, in which reduced dispersal and
mobility may be coupled with reduced suitable habitat
(Lara-Reséndiz et al. 2020).
The effects of climate change could present a severe
threat to insular systems, since amphibians and reptiles
obviously cannot expand or modify their distributions to
compensate for its effects. Among terrestrial vertebrates
on islands, reports show that amphibians and reptiles
could be the most affected by climate change. Estimates
indicate that many species could lose close to 50% of
their distribution ranges (Ureta et al. 2018). In addition
to this factor, the rise in sea level due to the effects of
climate change would affect many of the reptiles on
islands (Bellard et al. 2013; Pliego-Sanchez et al. 2021).
Although the effects of climate change on amphibians in
the Baja California Peninsula have not been evaluated, we
realize that changes in temperature on a global scale also
will have strong effects on amphibians. These changes
could affect reproduction and hibernation periods, as
well as their ability to find food, alter pathogen-host
dynamics, lead to increased stress from UV radiation,
as well as alterations in reproduction and hibernation
periods (Blaustein et al. 2010).
Species that inhabit elevations above 500 m are
expected to lose a significant part of their climatically
suitable area (Alves-Ferreira et al. 2022). Conversely,
species that inhabit arid environments tend to expand
their ranges in response to climate change. This result
can be explained by the environmental characteristics
of these habitats, which tend to have extreme seasonal
climates with well-defined periods of drought and rain
(Alves-Ferreira et al. 2022). Although the Cape Region
in Baja California Sur is not particularly diverse in
amphibian species, some predictions also indicate a
reduction in the number of species that inhabit tropical
dry forest (Ballesteros-Barrera et al. 2022).
Conservation Status
We used the three systems of conservation assessment
that were used in the previous entries in the Mexican
Conservation Series (MCS; see above). These systems
are SEMARNAT (2019), the IUCN Red List (http://
iucnredlist.org), and the EVS (Wilson et al. 2013a,b).
Based on the features of the Baja California Peninsula
system, we updated the assessments from these three
systems as necessary.
The SEMARNAT List of Threatened Species
The Mexican Federal Government designates threatened
species on the NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010 listing.
Species are classified through a risk assessment method
developed by the Secretaria del Medio Ambiente y
Recursos Naturales, with the last update published in
2019 (SEMARNAT 2019). The available ratings from
this list are provided in Table 7 and summarized in
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
Table 10. SEMARNAT categorizations for the herpetofaunal species in the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico, arranged by family.
Non-native species are excluded.
Number
of
species
142
158
I i eS) — =
Table 10, and non-designated species are not included
on the NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010 list. This system
utilizes three categories of assessment: endangered (P),
threatened (A), and under special protection (Pr), and
non-designated species are indicated here by using a “no
status” (NS) category.
The data in Table 10 show that 85 (53.8%) of the 158
native species inhabiting the Baja California Peninsula
and its adjacent islands are included in NOM-059
SEMARNAT, whereas 73 (46.2%) are not included,
which could indicate either that they have not been
assessed or are not considered as threatened.
In all MCS studies, the question always arises as
to whether any bias is shown toward the conservation
assessments of endemic species as opposed to non-
endemic species using the SEMARNAT system,
inasmuch as the majority of the species in a given area
examined, in this case the Baja California Peninsula
and its adjacent islands, remain unassessed. In order to
answer this question, the pertinent data are shown in
Table 11. These data show that about one-half of the
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
SEMARNAT categorization
Special
Endangered (P) | Threatened (A) Protection (Pr)
No Status
“
non-endemic species (42, or 51.9% of 81 total species)
remain unassessed, while a slightly lower number were
unassessed for the peninsular endemics (31, or 40.3% of
77 total species). For the total native herpetofauna, 74, or
46.8% of 158 species, remain unassessed. Thus, no clear
bias is apparent toward the peninsular endemics.
The IUCN System
The implementation of the system of conservation
assessment established by the International Union for
the Conservation of Nature has not kept pace with new
species descriptions and ongoing taxonomic research. In
fact, this 1s why the EVS system was developed—e.,
to assist in the development of conservation strategies
when the IUCN system has not been applied. The data
for the IUCN categorizations are shown in Table 8 and
summarized in Table 12.
Of the 158 native species in the herpetofauna of
the Baja California Peninsula, 130 (82.3%) have been
evaluated under the IUCN system (Table 12). Of these
99 November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Table 11. Comparison of SEMARNAT and distributional categorizations for the Baja California Peninsula herpetofauna. Non-
native species are excluded.
SEMARNAT category
Endangered (P) Threatened (A) we Eee 5 ae
Distributional category
130 species, 15 (11.5%) have been placed in one of
the three “threat categories,” including three in the
CR category, four in the EN category, and eight in the
VU category. The three species in the CR category are
the snake Crotalus catalinensis, a peninsular endemic
species; and the turtles Eretmochelys imbricata and
Dermochelys_ coriacea, both non-endemic marine
species. The four species in the EN category are the
anuran Anaxyrus californicus, a non-endemic species;
the lizards Anniella geronimensis and Sauromalus
hispidus, both peninsular endemic species; and the
turtle Chelonia mydas, a non-endemic marine species.
The eight VU species are the lizards Sauromalus
klauberi, Uta encantadae, U. lowei, U. tumidarostra,
Aspidoscelis catalinensis, and A. labialis, all peninsular
endemic species, and the turtles Lepidochelys olivacea
and Actinemys pallida, both non-endemic species.
Of the 115 species placed in the “lower risk categories”
Table 12. IUCN Red List categorizations for herpetofaunal families in the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico. Non-native species
are excluded. Shaded columns to the left are the “threat categories,” and those to the right are the categories for which too little
information on conservation status exists to allow the taxa to be placed in any other IUCN category, or they have not been evaluated.
Critically
Endangered UTES
Family ,
species
|
13
1
4
8
3
2
4
1
2
158
158
6
30
3)
3
7
1
29
7
1
2
5
14
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Near
Vulnerable | +) +-eatened
IUCN Red List categorization
Least
Concern
5
Data Not
Deficient Evaluated
=
N
N
(EES
¢
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
(NT and LC), only seven are in the NT category, with the
remaining 108 species in the LC category (Table 12). The
seven NT species are the anurans Rana draytonii, Rana
boylii, and Spea hammondii, all non-endemic species, and
the lizards are Sauromalus slevini, Phrynosoma mcallii,
Uma notata, and Phyllodactylus unctus, which include
two peninsular endemic species and two non-endemic
species. The 108 LC species make up 68.4% of the 158
native species in the Baja California Peninsula. Finally, 28
species have not been assessed using the [UCN system,
including three allocated to the DD category. These 28
Species comprise 17.7% of the native species, and their
assessments using the EVS system are given below.
The EVS System
As discussed in all the earlier MCS _ studies, the
Environmental Vulnerability System (EVS) initially
was developed for use in the conservation evaluation
of the herpetofauna in the country of Honduras (Wilson
and McCranie 2004). Those authors created this system
as a means for determining the conservation status of
the members of a herpetofauna whose knowledge was
insufficient when using the IUCN system. When the
work of the MCS began in 2013, it was evident that
the EVS could be applied to the Mexican herpetofauna
just as easily as it had for the Honduran herpetofauna.
Subsequently, this system has been employed in all of the
MCS studies to date (see above), including the present
one. Thus, the EVS values for the 152 native non-marine
species of the Baja California Peninsula are shown in
Table 8 and summarized in Table 13.
The EVS values range from 3 to 20. The most frequent
values (applied to 10 or more species) are 9 (11), 10 (10),
11 (15), 12 (14), 14 (15), 15 (15), 16 (18), and 17 (29).
Collectively, these eight values were applied to 127 of the
152 native non-marine species (83.6%). The lowest score
of 3 was ascertained for two anuran species (Scaphiopus
couchii and Anaxyrus punctatus) and the highest score of
20 was assigned to the Todos Santos Island Kingsnake
(Lampropeltis herrerae).
The EVS scores are grouped into three categories
Table 13. Environmental Vulnerability Scores (EVS) for the herpetofaunal species in the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico,
arranged by family. The shaded area to the left encompasses low vulnerability scores, and the one to the right high vulnerability
scores. Non-native species are excluded.
Number Environmental Vulnerability Scores
| Environmental Vulnerability Scores
aS ee eee | | |
| Bufonidae | 6 | te | 1 | ~ | ~] 21 [=|
Se oo
| Ranidae | 3 eee) — |) | 2 | — (ee
| Scaphiopodidac | (AGMA eee) — | 1 | — | — [ESS ee ee
Subtotal | 3) Ens See i |: |? | ahaa
| Plethodontidac || 3 (a eee ee) — | — | — | — [Se
| Subtotal | 3S ee) — | — | — | — [ee
| Total | eee — | — | — | — eee
|Anguidee | 5S se eee! | |—|—|- Rn
|Amiclide || 2. See —| | |—|- Rn Eee
| Bipedidae | ees —~ | — | — | — [ee
L-Crotaphycidae [S| Se emcees — {1 | 1 | — Re
—_ oo ==
Ee ee || ||: |-|> Be
Family
| Phyllodactylidac | S(t ee ee)! | — | — | — [ee
| Scincidae
Scincidae | 3 =a Ea) | ||!) aaa aa ee
| Teiidac |S eee eee || — | — | — [ee
| Xantusiidac | 4 ee eee) — | 2 | — | — [SR eee
| Subtotal =| 8 TOL OT at ToT etait ato {oto {4 {se {o [sii] olio |
| Charinidae | eee | | — | — | — eee
| Colubridac | 2 ee —|2 |: |) aaa
| Dipsadidac | 7 eee 2 | | — | — ee
| Leptotyphlopidac | (INN re eet OMe) — | — | — | — [RSS eee
| Natricidac | 4 eee) — | | | — ee
| Viperidac | 12 ees — | — | 1 | 2 ee
| Subtotal | ST OT tT tT at Tat Ts To] st 4 tof] sts | 4 ts [3 [2 {4 [|
| Emydidae | Ee ee) — | — | — | ee
| Testudinidac |e ee ee ee) — | — | — | — [ee
| Subtotal | TOT Of of of of ofofololfoltifol2z{o{ofol{o{o |
Total | GS | OT | 2 Ta] 3 | © [0] 9 | to] 2] 8 | 13 | 15 | 18 | 20] 2 | 5 | 0 |
Sams total _|__152__ [RAISES RSAC 10 | 1s | 14 | 9 SIRS ES
| Categorytotal | 52H
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 101 November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Table 14. Comparison of Environmental Vulnerability Scores (EVS) and IUCN categorizations for members of the herpetofauna of
the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico. Non-native species are excluded. The shaded area at the top encompasses low vulnerability
scores, and the one at the bottom high vulnerability scores.
IUCN category
Critically iRndanoered Vulnerable Near Least Data Not Total
a 8 a ss a =
of low, medium, and high vulnerability. As a result,
the summary values (Table 13) increase from low
vulnerability (28 species) to medium vulnerability (48
species), and then to high vulnerability (76 species).
Typically, this pattern is characteristic of herpetofaunas
containing more endemic than non-endemic species,
although this is not the case with the herpetofauna of the
Baja California Peninsula, in which there are 83 non-
endemic species and 75 endemic species. However, this
pattern could be due to the high level of island endemics
that have high vulnerability values.
The numbers of species in the herpetofauna of the
Baja California Peninsula for each IUCN/EVS score
combination are shown in Table 14. These data illustrate
that although both systems agree on the low vulnerability
category and Least Concern category for 26 species
(17%), they differ in the remaining categories, as only 11
of the 76 high vulnerability species (14.5%) are placed
into one of the three IUCN “threat categories” (CR,
EN, or VU). As was found in all other MCS studies, the
results of the application of the IUCN and EVS systems
of conservation assessment do not correspond well with
one another.
Of the 152 species that can be assessed by both the
IUCN and EVS systems, only three have been allocated
to the IUCN DD category (Table 15). These are three
peninsular endemic snake species (Lampropeltis
catalinensis, Masticophis barbouri, and Rhinocheilus
etheridgei), which have respective EVS scores of 18, 17,
and 17. Based on the arguments presented in previous
MCS studies, we suggest that once these species are
evaluated by the IUCN, they should be relegated to the
CR (Lampropeltis catalinensis) and EN (Rhinocheilus
etheridgei and Masticophis barbouri) categories.
Twenty-five species (15.8% of the 158 native species)
have not been evaluated by the IUCN system. These 25
species include seven lizards, 16 snakes, and two turtles.
The majority of these species (15 of 25, or 60.0%) are
peninsular endemics, and the remainder (10, or 40%) are
non-endemics. These species are allocated to the three
EVS categories of vulnerability as follows: two low
(8.0%); seven medium (28.0%); and 16 high (64.0%).
Based on the vulnerability values, species with an EVS
of 17 and greater might be placed in the CR category;
Table 15. Environmental Vulnerability Scores (EVS) for members of the herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico,
that are allocated to the IUCN Data Deficient category. ** = peninsular endemic.
Environmental Vulnerability Score (EVS)
Taxon Geographic Ecological Reproductive mode/ Total
—=—- ——V——re —e—eeeo of — score
| Lampropeltis catalinensis** | catalinensis | Lampropeltis catalinensis** | ig
Masticophis barbouri** Se a rs
Rhinocheilusetheridgei** | 6 EBT
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
No. 1. Anaxyrus californicus (Camp, 1915). The Arroyo Toad
is found “west of the deserts in southern California (USA)
near Santa Margarita in San Luis Obispo County south into
northern Baja California (Mexico), at least as far south as
Arroyo San Simon, just south of San Quintin” (Frost 2022).
This individual came from Rancho Meling, Sierra San Pedro
Martir, in the municipality of San Quintin. In this study its
EVS was estimated as 11, placing it in the upper portion of
the medium vulnerability category. The IUCN has assessed its
conservation status as Endangered (EN) and SEMARNAT lists
it as Threatened (A). Photo by Ivan Parr.
No. 3. Rana draytonii (Baird and Girard, 1852). The California
Red-legged Frog is distributed from “Mendocino County
(California, USA) south along the Pacific coast of the USA
to the vicinity of Arroyo Santo Domingo in northern Baja
California (Mexico)” (Frost 2022). This individual was found
at Rancho Meling, Sierra San Pedro Martir, in the municipality
of San Quintin. In this study its EVS was indicated as 11,
placing it in the medium vulnerability category. The IUCN
evaluated its status as Near Threatened (NT), and this species
is listed by SEMARNAT as in danger of extinction (P). Photo
by J.A. Soriano.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
103
No. 2. Pseudacris hypochondriaca (Hallowell, 1854). The
Baja California Chorus Frog ranges from “southern California,
western and southwestern Nevada, and adjacent northwestern
Arizona (Mohave County) south to the southern tip of Baja
California peninsula, Mexico” (Frost 2022). This individual
was found at Rancho Meling, Sierra San Pedro Martir, in
the municipality of San Quintin. In this study its EVS was
determined as 9, placing it at the upper limit of the low
vulnerability category. This species has not been evaluated
by the IUCN or SEMARNAT. Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-
Villavicencio.
Salamander ranges “from sea level to near 1,270 m in elevation
and ranges from Eureka in Humboldt County, California, south
through the Coast Ranges, terminating near Valle Santo Tomas
in northwestern Baja California. It also occurs on the Coronado
Norte island” (Grismer 2002: 56). This individual came from
La Mision, Baja California, in the municipality of Ensenada.
In this study its EVS is listed as 14, placing it at the lower
limit of the high vulnerability category. The IUCN judged its
conservation status as Least Concern (LC), and SEMARNAT
lists it as a species of Special Protection (Pr). Photo by Jorge H.
Valdez-Villavicencio.
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Table 16. Environmental Vulnerability Scores (EVS) for members of the herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico,
that are currently not evaluated (NE) by the IUCN. Non-native taxa are excluded. ** = peninsular endemic.
Environmental Vulnerability Score (EVS)
Taxon
Geographic Ecological Reproductive mode/ Total
distribution distribution Degree of persecution score
1 11
[Amnietiasebbinsis =i
[Hxpsiglona ochroriynctus [4
[Rena boenger™ «dS
[Crotalus heltes <i
[Crotalus prrius_——=dL—SCSCS
trachemys nebutosa** | __s
[ Gopherus morafiai [4
which includes Dipsosaurus catalinensis (17), Crotalus
polisi (19), and C. thalassoporus (19). All three of these
species are peninsular endemics. Vulnerability values of
15 and 16 can be allocated to the EN category, including
Gopherus morafkai (15), Xantusia gilberti (15), X.
sherbrookei (15), Sonora punctatissima (15), Sonora
straminea (15), Trachemys nebulosa (15), Hypsiglena
catalinae (16), and Hypsiglena marcosensis (16). All
but one of these species (G. morafkai) are peninsular
endemics. Species with an EVS of 14 could be placed
in the VU category, including Phrynosoma cerroense,
Aspidoscelis maximus, Lampropeltis multifasciata,
Sonora annulata, and Rena boettgeri. The first of these
two species and the last one are peninsular endemics.
The species with an EVS of 10 to 13 can be allocated
to the NT category, including Anniella stebbinsi (11),
Xantusia wigginsi (11), Sonora fasciata (12), Sonora
mosaueri (12), Hypsglena ochrorhynchus (10), Crotalus
helleri (12), and C. pyrrhus (13). Only two of these seven
species (S. fasciata and S. mosaueri) are peninsular
endemics. Finally, the two species with an EVS of 3 to
9 can be placed in the LC category (Sonora cincta and
Masticophis fuliginosus).
The largest number of species in the Baja California
Peninsula herpetofauna that can be assigned an EVS are
placed in the IUCN LC category (106 species; see Table
SS ES ee ee =
a a a ee ae ee
Ee a a EE eee ee
ee ee ee ee eee ae eee
ee ea
a | | eee
ee ee ae rr ee ee
—_— aS a a a ee ee eee
EEE —E EE EE a ae
a ee eee eee eee
ae es
a ee rr re ee a
a | (ce | ee || (|
Ee ee ee
a a a a ee ee ae
ee eS ee a eee eee eee
eS as
[a | | | | Ee
| | "SX _
ae |e ee ee en | eee eee
a a ee ee eee eee eee eee
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
—
17), even though their EVS values range from 3 to 20,
the range found in the entire herpetofauna of the Baja
California Peninsula, as well as the entire theoretical EVS
range. Of these 106 species, 47 (44.3%) are peninsular
endemics, and the remaining 59 (55.7%) are non-endemics.
As indicated in the above paragraphs dealing with the NE
Species, we suggest that the species with EVS scores of 3
to 9 might be allocated to the LC category, 10 to 13 to the
NT category, 14 to the VU category, 15 and 16 to the EN
category, and 17 to 20 to the CR category. Accordingly,
the following species numbers might be placed in the
IUCN categories as follows: LC (26), NT (36), VU (8),
EN (20), and CR (16). We recognize that the EVS values
will not always correspond with IUCN or SEMARNAT
categories. The IUCN and EVS categories evaluate the
population along the entire distribution of the species.
As for the SEMARNAT system, it only lists threatened
Species, SO species with EVS values lower than 9 are not
expected to appear in the NOM-059-SEMARNAT 2010.
It remains unknown, however, whether their omission is
due to a lack of evaluation or because their populations are
not threatened.
In general, the EVS values for amphibians are
assigned lower values, with only two of the 16 native
species scoring in the high vulnerability category (14 or
higher). The two amphibians with high values are the
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
No. 5. Batrachoseps major Camp, 1915. The Garden Slender
Salamander is distributed from “Los Angeles County south
to the vicinity of El Rosario in northwestern Baja California.
It also occurs on the Pacific islands Coronado (Norte, Medio,
and Sur), and Todos Santos Sur” (Grismer 2002: 58). This
individual was found at Rancho Las Dos Cumbres, Tecate, Baja
California, in the municipality of Tecate. In this study its EVS
was calculated as 14, placing it at the lower limit of the high
vulnerability category. The IUCN assigned this salamander to
the Least Concern (LC) category, but this species is not listed
by SEMARNAT. Photo by Anny Peralta-Garcia.
ieee
very
= edhe
No. 7. Elgaria nana (Fitch, 1934). The Islas Coronado Alligator
Lizard is known from all the islands of the Islas Coronado
archipelago on the coast of northwestern Baja California.
This individual was encountered on Isla Coronado Sur, Baja
California, in the municipality of Tijuana. In this study its
EVS was determined as 16, placing it in the middle portion
of the high vulnerability category. The IUCN assessed its
conservation status as Least Concern (LC), and it is not listed
by SEMARNAT. Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
No. 6. Ensatina eschscholtzii Gray, 1850. The Monterey
Salamander “ranges along the Pacific coast of North America
from southwestern British Columbia south to at least 22 km
south of Ensenada in northwestern Baja California” (Grismer
2002: 60; Peralta-Garcia and Valdez-Villavicencio 2004).
This individual came from La Mision, Baja California, in the
municipality of Ensenada. The species EVS was estimated as
13, placing it at the higher limit of the medium vulnerability
category. The IUCN assessed its conservation status as Least
Concern (LC), and SEMARNAT considers it as a species of
Special Protection (Pr). Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
Alligator Lizard “is restricted to the mountains and foothill
regions of the Cape Region of Baja California” (Grismer 2002:
248). This individual came from Arroyo La Junta, Sierra La
Laguna, Baja California Sur, in the municipality La Paz. In
this study its EVS is indicated as 14, placing it at the lower
limit of the high vulnerability category. The IUCN assessed its
conservation status as Least Concern (LC), and SEMARNAT
designates it as a species of Special Protection (Pr). Photo by
Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Table 17. Environmental Vulnerability Scores (EVS) for members of the herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico,
that are assigned to the IUCN Least Concern (LC) category. Non-native and marine taxa are not included. ** = peninsular endemic.
Environmental Vulnerability Score (EVS)
Jaxon Geographic Ecological Reproductive mode/ Total
distribution distribution Degree of —_ score
Anaxyrus boreas pf
es a eT ys ae ae
| Anaxyruswoodhousti |S
JInciliusalvarius A
jPrendacriscadavering fA
aap a
| Scaphiopuscouchii— TE 8
| Aneidestugubris TS
| Batrachosepsmajor_ | A
| Ensatinaeschscholtzti_ | SB
| Elgariacedrosensis** TS 8
| Elgaria multicarinata, |S
| Elgarianana*® 8
Hlgaria paveicaringrg®® PSS
is
CBipes bongo?
| Crotaphytusgrismeri*® TS
| Crotaphytusinsularis™® TS
| Crotaphytus vestigium |
ul
| Gambeliawislizenii | 3 8
| Coleonyx gypsicolus** TB
| Coleonyx switaki
ii
| Coleonyxvariegatus | 8
| Ctenosaurahemilopha*® |S
| Dipsosaurus dorsalis | 8
| Sauromatusater 8B
| Callisaurusdraconoides | AS
| Petrosaurusmearnsi TS
NTRP RL OTs
Ww} w Pot Bit
ik
| Petrosaurusstevini®*® TS
| Petrosaurus thalassinus®* TST
| Phrynosomablainvillii | ST
Pinsnesome coronarnmm®® ff
a
ee a a Tc | Sa
| Sceloporus grandaevus** |
| Sceloporushunsakeri** TS
Secloporus hoki®? —fS
$s
| Sceloporus occidentalis | SS
| Sceloporusoreutti 8
Secloporus vandenburgiamys J JS
$l aT
ross ormatys JSS
$l
| Phyllodactylus bugastrolepis** | E 8T
He
ial
a
N
tt
i
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 106 November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
Table 17 (continued). Environmental Vulnerability Scores (EVS) for members of the herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula,
Mexico, that are assigned to the IUCN Least Concern (LC) category. Non-native and marine taxa are not included. ** = peninsular
endemic.
Environmental Vulnerability Score (EVS)
Taxon Geographic Ecological Reproductive mode/ Total
distribution distribution Degree of persecution score
Phyllodactylus nocticolus
Phyllodactylus partidus** [> — |
15
Phyllodactylus xanti** i
Plestiodon gilberti
Nn
Wo
—
oS)
Plestiodon lagunensis**
Plestiodon skiltonianus
Aspidoscelis canus**
Aspidoscelis carmenensis**
Aspidoscelis celeripes**
epee —
STN] oO —
Aspidoscelis ceralbensis**
Aspidoscelis danheimae**
Oo
Aspidoscelis espiritensis**
—~
Aspidoscelis franciscensis**
j-)
Aspidoscelis hyperythrus
—
Oo
—
Aspidoscelis pictus**
Aspidoscelis tigris
— — — — —s — —
— Nn —
Xantusia henshawi
-)
Lichanura trivirgata
Arizona elegans
—
Arizona pacata**
Bogertophis rosaliae
Lampropeltis californiae
N
>)
Lampropeltis herrerae**
Masticophis aurigulus**
Masticophis flagellum
Masticophis lateralis
—
Phyllorhynchus decurtatus
Pituophis catenifer
~“
Pituophis insulanus**
N
eS)
Pituophis vertebralis**
Rhinocheilus lecontei
Salvadora hexalepis
Sonora savagei**
Sonora semiannulata
Tantilla planiceps
Trimorphodon lyrophanes
Diadophis punctatus
Hypsiglena chlorophaea
Oo
Hypsiglena gularis**
is
Hypsiglena slevini**
Rena humilis
|
lela — — —[—}_)
im >) — Oo
—
Thamnophis elegans
Thamnophis hammondii
Thamnophis marcianus
Thamnophis validus**
Crotalus angelensis**
CoOoTr
Crotalus atrox
Crotalus cerastes
Uo
Crotalus enyo**
Crotalus lorenzoensis**
Crotalus mitchellii**
Crotalus ruber
—
en oo
WTO
| Phyllodactylusxani** | ST
| Plestiodongilberti |
| Plestiodonlagunensis** |S
| Plestiodon skiltonianus | 3S
| Aspidosceliscanus** |
| Aspidoscelis carmenensis** | 6B
| Aspidoscelis celeripes** | SE
| Aspidoscelis ceralbensis** | OB
| Aspidoscelisdanheimae** |_| 8
| Aspidoscelis espiritensis** |S
| Aspidoscelis franciscensis** |
| Aspidoscelishyperythrus | 2S
| Aspidoscelispictus** | OE
| Aspidoscelistigris |
| Xantusiahenshawi
| Lichanuratrivirgata |
| Arizonaelegans |
| Arizonapacata**® TS
| Bogertophisrosaliae |
| Lampropeltis californiae | A
| Lampropeltisherrerae** | OE
| Masticophisaurigulus** |S
| Masticophis flagellum | 8
| Masticophislaterais | 3S
| Phyllorhynchusdecurtaus | AES
| Pituophiscatenifer
| Pituophis insulanus®*
| Pituophisvertebralis**® |S
| Rhinocheiluslecomei_ | tT 8
| Salvadorahexalepis |
| Sonorasavager**
| Sonorasemiannulata |
| Tantillaplaniceps | 8
| Trimorphodon lyrophanes |
| Diadophis punctatus
| Hypsigiena chlorophaca | 3S
| Hypsiglenagularis®* | 8
| Hypsigienaslevini®* TS
| Renahumilis 8
| Thamnophiselegans |
| Thamnophishammondii | AES
| Thamnophis marcianus |S
| Thamnophisvalidus** |S
| Crotalusangelensis** | OT
| Crotalusatrox, 8
| Crotalus cerastes TT
| Crotalusenyo*® TS 8
| Crotaluslorenzoensis®* |B
| Crotalusruber
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 107 November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
at
No. 9. Anniella geronimensis Shaw, 1940. The Baja California
Legless Lizard “ranges along the coastal aeolian dune regions
of northwestern Baja California, from approximately 6 km
north of Colonia Guerrero south to just south of Punta Baja
at the northern edge of Bahia El Rosario. It is also known
from the Pacific islands of San Geronimo and San Martin.”
(Grismer 2002: 242). This individual was encountered at San
Quintin, Baja California, in the municipality of San Quintin.
In this study its EVS is noted as 14, placing it at the lower
limit of the high vulnerability category. The IUCN judged its
conservation status as Endangered (EN), and SEMARNAT lists
it as a species of Special Protection (Pr). Photo by Jorge H.
Valdez-Villavicencio.
No. 11. Crotaphytus insularis Van Denburgh and Slevin, 1921.
The Isla Angel de la Guarda Collared Lizard is endemic to Isla
Angel de la Guarda in the Gulf of California in the municipality
of Mexicali (Grismer 2002). Its EVS was assessed as 16,
placing it in the middle of the high vulnerability category. The
IUCN evaluated its conservation status as Least Concern (LC),
but this lizard is not listed by SEMARNAT. Photo by Jorge H.
Valdez-Villavicencio.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
ts
&
le
y q) 2 |
es pt ey ~~ 2 he a — ~G ~ Bp
No. 10. Bipes biporus (Cope, 1894). The Five-toed Worm
Lizard is distributed “throughout the western portion of
the southern half of Baja California peninsula, west of the
Peninsular Ranges, from approximately 17 km north of Jesus
Maria, where the Sierra Columbia contacts the Pacific coast,
south to Todos Santos (Mahrdt et al. 2022)...At the Isthmus
of La Paz, its distribution extends east across the low, sandy
flats and contacts the Gulf coast at Bahia de La Paz” (Grismer
2002: 254). It also occurs on the Pacific island of Magdalena
(Peralta-Garcia et al. 2007). This individual was found at La
Paz, Baja California Sur, in the municipality of La Paz. In this
study its EVS was determined as 19, placing it near the higher
limit of the high vulnerability category. The IUCN assessed its
conservation status as Least Concern (LC), and SEMARNAT
designates it as a species of Special Protection (Pr). Photo by
Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
No. 12. Gambelia copeii (Yarrow, 1882). The Baja California
Leopard Lizard “is endemic to Baja California peninsula and
ranges from extreme southern San Diego County, California,
south to at least Todos Santos on the west coast of the Cape
Region” (Grismer 2002: 114). This individual came from 20
km NW of San Juanico, Baja California Sur, in the municipality
of Comondu. In this study its EVS was estimated as 11, placing
it in the lower portion of the medium vulnerability category.
The IUCN judged its conservation status as Least Concern
(LC), but this species is not listed by SEMARNAT. Photo by
Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
No. 13. Coleonyx switaki (Murphy, 1974). Switak’s Banded
Gecko “ranges along the desert foothills of the Peninsular
Ranges from at least northern San Diego County, California,
south to just north of Santa Rosalia” (Grismer 2002: 199) in
Baja California Sur. This individual was located in San Ignacio,
Baja California Sur, in the municipality of Mulegé. In this
study its EVS is noted as 10, placing it at the lower limit of
the medium vulnerability category. The IUCN determined its
conservation status as Least Concern (LC), but this gecko is not
listed by SEMARNAT. Photo by Tim Warfel.
No. 14. Ctenosaura hemilopha (Cope, 1863). The Cape Spiny-
tailed Iguana “ranges from near Loreto south along the Sierra
la Giganta to the west coast near Arroyo Seco and through
the Cape Region...In the Gulf of California, C. hemilopha is
known only from Isla Cerralvo...” (Grismer 2002: 117). This
individual came from Sierra La Gata, Baja California Sur, in
the municipality of La Paz. In this study its EVS was calculated
as 16, placing it in the middle portion of the high vulnerability
category. The IUCN determined its conservation status as Least
Concern (LC), but SEMARNAT considers it to be a species of
Special Protection (Pr). Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
No. 15. Sauromalus ae tanta 1891. The Spiny
Chuckwalla “is known from the Gulf islands of Angel de la
Guarda, Cabeza de Caballo, Flecha, Granito, La Ventana,
Mejia, Piojo, Pond, San Lorenzo Norte, San Lorenzo Sur, and
Smith” (Grismer 2002: 128). This individual was found on Isla
Angel de la Guarda, Baja California, in the municipality of
Mexicali. In this study its EVS was determined as 14, placing
it at the lower limit of the high vulnerability category. The
IUCN assessed its conservation status as Endangered (EN), and
SEMARNAT noted it as Threatened (A). Photo by Jorge H.
Valdez-Villavicencio.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
PRES Fe
ta eke
No. 16. Callisaurus draconoides Blainville, 1835. The Zebra-
tailed Lizard “ranges throughout the Sonoran and Mojave
deserts of the southwestern United States and northern
Mexico south to southern Sinaloa and all the arid regions of
Baja California” (Grismer 2002: 136). This individual was
encountered at Guerrero Negro, Baja California Sur, in the
municipality of Mulegé. In this study its EVS is listed as 12,
placing it in the upper portion of the medium vulnerability
category. The IUCN assessed its conservation status as Least
Concern (LC), and SEMARNAT designates it as Threatened
(A). Photo by Alan Harper.
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Table 18. Number of herpetofaunal species in three distributional status categories among the 10 physiographic regions of the Baja
California Peninsula, Mexico. Rank was determined by adding the state and country endemics.
salamanders Aneides lugubris and Batrachoseps major,
both with an EVS of 14 (Table 8). In Baja California,
the major threats to amphibians are wetland habitat loss
and the presence of exotic species. If regional specific
criteria were considered in future EVS_ evaluations,
vulnerability values for amphibians in this region likely
would be higher and correspond more closely with those
from other parts of Mexico.
Relative Herpetofaunal Priority
Johnson et al. (2015) introduced the concept of Relative
Herpetofaunal Priority (RHP) as a simple means for
measuring the relative importance of the herpetofaunal
species in any geographic segment (e.g., state or
physiographic region). Ascertaining the RHP involves
the employment of two methods: (1) calculating the
absolute number of state, country, or regional endemic
species as they relate to the entire regional herpetofauna,
and (2) calculating the absolute number of high EVS
category species in the entire regional herpetofauna. The
pertinent data for these two methods are shown in Tables
18 and 19.
Based on the relative number of peninsular endemics
(Table 18), the 1* rank is held by the GIR with 50
peninsular endemics from a total of 84 species (59.5%).
The remaining ranks are as follows: 2" is ATR (26 of 65
species, 40.0%); 3 is CGCR (24 of 62 species, 38.7%);
4" is SLLR (21 of 41 species, 51.2%); 5" (held by two
regions) is MR (18 of 51 species, 35.3%) and VR (18 of
64 species, 28.1%); 6" is PIR (15 of 47 species, 31.9%);
7" is CR (eight of 60 species, 13.3%); 8 is LC VR (five
of 68 species, 7.4%); and 9" is BCCFR (0 of 27 species,
0.0%).
Clearly, the highest herpetofaunal priority is
associated with the Gulf Islands Region. This region
consists of all the islands lying off the Baja California
Peninsula and within the Gulf of California, excluding
those more closely associated with the state of Sonora on
the eastern side of the Gulf. Collectively, these islands
harbor the largest number of species found in any of
the geographic regions of Baja California. The number
of species 1s 84, which is 48.8% of the total number
(172) known from the entire peninsula and its adjacent
islands. The herpetofauna of these islands is only one
of two regional herpetofaunas in which the number of
peninsular endemics exceeds that of the non-endemics.
The other such region is the SLLR, in which the number
of peninsular endemics (21) is greater than the number
of non-endemics (18). In the Gulf region, the number
of peninsular endemics is 1.6 times that of the non-
endemics (50 vs. 32). The 50 peninsular endemics in the
Gulf region include species that occupy from one to nine
of the 10 recognized regions in the peninsula, as follows:
Table 19. Number of herpetofaunal species in the three EVS categories (low, medium, and high) among the 10 geographic regions
of the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico. Rank determined by the relative number of high EVS species. Non-native and marine
Species are excluded.
Geographic region
CR
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
No. 17. Petrosaurus repens (Van Denburgh, 1895). The Short-
nosed Rock Lizard ranges from Mesa San Carlos near the middle
of Baja California southward to Arroyo Seco in the Isthmus
of La Paz. This individual came from San Miguel Comondu,
Baja California Sur. In this study its EVS was calculated as 14,
placing it at the lower limit of the high vulnerability category.
The IUCN determined its conservation status as Least Concern
(LC), and it is not listed by SEMARNAT. Photo by Jorge H.
Valdez-Villavicencio.
Lizard ranges “west of the Sierra Nevada crest from Shasta
County, California, south through all of southern California
west of the Mojave and Sonoran deserts” (Grismer 2002:
151) and the extreme northwestern portion of Baja California.
This individual was found on the road to Sierra Juarez, Baja
California, in the municipality of Ensenada. In this study
its EVS was calculated as 12, placing it in the middle of the
medium vulnerability category. The IUCN evaluated its
conservation status as Least Concern (LC), and it is not listed
by SEMARNAT. Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
No. 18. Petrosaurus thalassinus (Cope, 1863). The San Lucan
Banded Rock Lizard “is restricted to the Cape Region of Baja
California, where it occurs in at least four disjunct populations:
one in the Sierra La Laguna and contiguous ranges, another
in the Sierra La Trinidad, and one each on the Gulf islands of
Espiritu Santo and Partida Sur...” (Grismer 2002: 149). This
individual was located at Sierra Las Cacachilas, Baja California
Sur, in the municipality of La Paz. In this study its EVS was
assessed as 17, placing it in the middle of the high vulnerability
category. The IUCN evaluated its conservation status as Least
Concern (LC), and SEMARNAT determined it to be a species
of Special Protection (Pr). Photo by Alan Harper.
No. 20. Phrynosoma coronatum (Blainville, 1835). The Coast
Horned Lizard ranges across the Cape Region of Baja California
Sur and across the Magdalena Plain to the southern edge of
the Vizcaino Desert (Leaché et al. 2009). This individual was
found in the Sierra Las Cacachilas, Baja California Sur, in the
municipality of La Paz. In this study its EVS was assessed as
12, placing it in the upper portion of the medium vulnerability
category. The IUCN judged its conservation status as Least
Concern (LC), and it is not listed by SEMARNAT. Photo by
Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
one (38 species, 76.0%); three (two species, 4.0%); four
(two species, 4.0%); five (three species, 6.0%); seven
(one species, 2.0%); eight (three species, 6.0%); and nine
(one species, 2.0%).
Based on the relative number of high vulnerability
species (Table 19), the 1‘trank 1s held by the GIR (45 of 76
species, 59.2%), the same rank as for the relative number
of country endemics (see above). The rankings are the
same for seven of the 10 regions. The high vulnerability
ranks for species in the remaining seven regions are as
follows: ATR (2™, 16 of 53 species; 30.2%); CGCR (3%,
15 of 54 species; 27.8%); SLLR (4", 13 of 39 species;
33.3%); VR (5", 10 of 58 species; 17.2%); PIR (6", 10 of
41 species; 24.4%): MR (7", nine of 45 species; 20.0%);
LCVR (8", six of 59 species; 10.2%); CR (9", five of
53 species; 9.4%); and BCCFR (10", four of 27 species;
14.8%).
Based on the relative numbers of peninsular endemic
and high vulnerability species, the 1* rank is held by
the GIR, the Gulf Islands Region, in which there are
50 peninsular endemics and 45 high vulnerability
species. The peninsular endemics include 33 lizards and
17 snakes. These species are indicated with a double
asterisk (see Table 4). The GIR also supports 45 high
vulnerability species, which are listed below (with the
EVS score in parentheses):
Crotaphytus insularis** (16)
Coleonyx gypsicolus** (16)
Ctenosaura hemilopha** (16)
Dipsosaurus catalinensis** (17)
Sauromalus hispidus** (14)
Sauromalus klauberi** (17)
Sauromalus slevini** (16)
Petrosaurus repens** (14)
Petrosaurus slevini** (16)
Petrosaurus thalassinus** (17)
Sceloporus angustus** (16)
Sceloporus grandaevus** (17)
Sceloporus hunsakeri** (14)
Sceloporus lineatulus** (17)
Uta encantadae** (17)
Uta lowei** (17)
Uta squamata** (17)
Uta tumidarostra** (17)
Phyllodactylus bugastrolepis** (17)
Phyllodactylus partidus** (16)
Phyllodactylus unctus** (15)
Aspidoscelis canus** (17)
Aspidoscelis carmenensis** (17)
Aspidoscelis catalinensis** (17)
Aspidoscelis celeripes** (16)
Aspidoscelis ceralbensis** (17)
Aspidoscelis danheimae** (17)
Aspidoscelis espiritensis** (16)
Aspidoscelis franciscensis** (17)
Aspidoscelis maximus** (14)
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
112
Aspidoscelis pictus** (17)
Lampropeltis catalinensis** (18)
Masticophis barbouri** (17)
Rhinocheilus etheridgei** (17)
Sonora punctatissima** (15)
Sonora savagei** (16)
Hypsiglena catalinae** (16)
Hypsiglena gularis** (16)
Hypsiglena marcosensis** (16)
Crotalus angelensis** (18)
Crotalus catalinensis** (19)
Crotalus lorenzoensis** (19)
Crotalus mitchellii (15)
Crotalus polisi** (19)
Crotalus thalassoporus** (19)
All but one of these 45 species are peninsular endemics,
and one is an MXUS species. As a group, their EVS
values range from 14 to 19.
The 2™ rank, with respect to high vulnerability species,
is held by the ATR, the Arid Tropical Region, which
includes the following 16 high vulnerability species:
Elgaria paucicarinata** (14)
Elgaria velazquezi** (15)
Bipes biporus** (19)
Ctenosaura hemilopha** (16)
Petrosaurus repens** (14)
Petrosaurus thalassinus** (17)
Sceloporus hunsakeri** (14)
Phyllodactylus unctus** (15)
Phyllodactylus xanti** (15)
Aspidoscelis maximus** (14)
Masticophis aurigulus** (15)
Sonora straminea** (15)
Rena boettgeri** (14)
Crotalus mitchellii** (15)
Trachemys nebulosa** (15)
Gopherus morafkai (15)
All of these species are peninsular endemics except for
one MXUS species. As a group, their EVS values range
from 14 to 19.
The 3™ rank is held by the CGCR, the Central Gulf
Coast Region, which includes the following 15 species:
Elgaria paucicarinata** (14)
Elgaria velazquezi** (15)
Bipes biporus** (19)
Ctenosaura hemilopha** (16)
Petrosaurus repens** (14)
Petrosaurus thalassinus** (17)
Sceloporus hunsakeri** (14)
Phyllodactylus unctus** (15)
Phyllodactylus xanti** (15)
Aspidoscelis maximus** (14)
Masticophis aurigulus** (15)
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
& : 4 oe *
ie wal
A Fy , ay :
. A” gh i ee, ly Ms
No. 21. Sceloporus angustus (Dickerson, 1919). The Isla Santa
Cruz Spiny Lizard “is known only from Islas San Diego and
Santa Cruz in the Gulf of California” (Grismer 2002: 158). This
individual was found on Isla Santa Cruz, Gulf of California, in
the municipality of Loreto. In this study its EVS is indicated
as 16, placing it in the middle portion of the high vulnerability
category. The IUCN judged its conservation status as Least
Concern (LC), and SEMARNAT indicated it as Threatened
(A). Photo by Alan Harper.
No. 23. Sceloporus grandaevus (male). This individual was
from Isla Cerralvo, Baja California Sur. Please see the legend
for No. 22 for information on its distribution and conservation
status. Photo by Tim Warfel.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
7
No. 22. Sceloporus grandaevus (female). The Isla Cerralvo
Spiny Lizard “is endemic to Isla Cerralvo in the Gulf of
California in the municipality of La Paz” (Grismer 2002:
159). In this study its EVS was calculated as 17, placing in the
middle portion of the high vulnerability category. The IUCN
determined its conservation status as Least Concern (LC), and
SEMARNAT listed it as Threatened (A). Photo by Jorge H.
Valdez-Villavicencio.
4 rf OT DERLAM \
No. 24. Sceloporus licki Van Denburgh, 1895. The Cape Spiny
Lizard “ranges along the mountainous foothill areas of the
Cape Region from Rancho Ancon south to near La Soledad in
the Sierra La Laguna...” (Grismer 2002: 173). This individual
was found at Cafion San Dionisio, Sierra La Laguna, Baja
California Sur, in the municipality of Los Cabos. Its EVS was
determined as 13, placing it at the upper limit of the medium
vulnerability category. The IUCN evaluated its conservation
status as Least Concern (LC), and SEMARNAT determined it
to be a species of Special Protection (Pr). Photo by Jorge H.
Valdez-Villavicencio.
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Sonora straminea** (15)
Rena boettgeri** (14)
Crotalus mitchellii** (15)
Trachemys nebulosa** (15)
Gopherus morafkai (15)
Of these 15 species, 14 (93.3%) are peninsular endemics,
and one is a non-endemic. As a group, their EVS values
range from 14 to 19.
The 4" rank is held by the SLLR, the Sierra La
Laguna Region, which includes the following 13 high
vulnerability species:
Elgaria paucicarinata** (14)
Ctenosaura hemilopha** (16)
Petrosaurus thalassinus** (17)
Sceloporus hunsakeri** (14)
Phyllodactylus unctus** (15)
Phyllodactylus xanti** (15)
Aspidoscelis maximum ** (14)
Xantusia gilberti** (15)
Masticophis aurigulus** (15)
Sonora straminea** (15)
Rena boettgeri** (14)
Crotalus mitchellii** (15)
Trachemys nebulosa** (15)
All of these species are peninsular endemics. As a group,
their EVS values range from 14 to 17.
The 5" rank is held by the VR, the Vizcaino Region,
which includes the following 10 high vulnerability
species:
Elgaria velazquezi** (15)
Anniella geronimensis** (14)
Bipes biporus** (19)
Petrosaurus repens** (14)
Phrynosoma cerroense** (14)
Urosaurus lahtelai** (16)
Aspidoscelis labialis** (15)
Arizona pacata** (14)
Crotalus mitchelli** (15)
Trachemys nebulosa** (15)
Of these 10 species, all are are peninsular endemics
(76.9%), and three are non-endemics. As a group, their
EVS values range from 14 to 19.
The 6" rank is held by the PIR, the Pacific Islands
Regions, which includes the following 10 high
vulnerability species:
Aneides lugubris (14)
Batrachoseps major (14)
Elgaria cedrosensis** (16)
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Elgaria nana** (16)
Anniella geronimensis** (14)
Bipes biporus** (19)
Phrynosoma cerroense** (14)
Lampropeltis herrerae** (20)
Pituophis insulanus** (17)
Crotalus mitchellii** (15)
Of the 10 species in the PIR, eight are peninsular
endemics and two are non-endemics. As a group, their
EVS values range from 14 to 20.
The 7" rank is held by the MR, the Magdalena Region,
which includes the following nine high vulnerability
species:
Elgaria velazquezi** (14)
Bipes biporus** (14)
Ctenosaura hemilopha** (18)
Petrosaurus repens** (14)
Phrynosoma cerroense** (16)
Xantusia sherbrookei** (16)
Arizona pacata** (14)
Crotalus mitchellii** (15)
Trachemys nebulosa** (18)
All nine of these species are peninsular endemics. As a
group, their EVS values range from 14 to 18.
The 8" rank is held by the LCVR, the Lower California
Valley Region, which includes the following six high
vulnerability species:
Crotaphytus grismeri** (16)
Phrynosoma mceallii (15)
Uma notata (15)
Urosaurus graciosus (15)
Sonora annulata (14)
Crotalus cerastes (16)
Of these six species, five are non-endemics and one 1s a
peninsular endemic. As a group, their EVS values range
from 14 to 16.
The 9" rank is held by the CR, the California Region,
which includes the following five high vulnerability
species:
Aneides lugubris (14)
Batrachoseps major (14)
Anniella geronimensis** (14)
Phrynosoma cerroense** (14)
Aspidoscelis labialis** (15)
Three of these species are peninsular endemics, and
the other two are non-endemics. As a group, their EVS
values range from 14 to 15.
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
No. 25. Sceloporus vandenburgianus Cope, 1896. The
Southern Sagebrush Lizard occurs “from the Coast Ranges in
Los Angeles County, California, south to southern San Diego
County. A disjunct population occurs in the Sierra Juarez and
Sierra San Pedro Martir, Baja California, Mexico...” (Grismer
2002: 174). This individual came from La Tasajera, Sierra San
Pedro Martir, in the municipality of Ensenada. In this study its
EVS is noted as 14, placing it at the lower limit of the high
vulnerability category. The IUCN judged its conservation
status as Least Concern (LC), and SEMARNAT assessed it as
a species of Special Protection (Pr). Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-
Villavicencio.
Leaf-toed Gecko “on the peninsula...is restricted to the Cape
Region. In the Gulf of California, it has been reported from
Islas Partida Sur, Espiritu Santo, Ballena, Gallo, Gallina,
and Cerralvo...” Grismer 2002: 209). This individual was
found in the Sierra Las Cacachilas, Baja California Sur, in
the municipality of La Paz. In this study its EVS is indicated
as 15, placing it in the lower portion of the high vulnerability
category. The IUCN judged its conservation status as Near
Threatened (NT), and SEMARNAT assessed this gecko as a
species of Special Protection (Pr). Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-
Villavicencio.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
No. 26. Urosaurus nigricaudus (Cope, 1864). The Black-
tailed Brush Lizard “ranges along the eastern side of the
Peninsular Ranges from San Diego County, California, south
to the Cape Region of Baja California Sur” (Grismer 2002:
180). This individual was found in the Cafion San Dionisio,
Sierra La Laguna, Baja California Sur, in the municipality of
Los Cabos. In this study its EVS was estimated as 7, placing
it in the upper portion of the low vulnerability category. The
IUCN judged its conservation status at Least Concern (LC),
and SEMARNAT listed it as Threatened (A). Photo by Jorge H.
Valdez-Villavicencio.
ai ray
- ‘ ‘ *; :
img ; | ; BE Es awe i
ie Pere WRB Se s i
No. 28. Plestiodon lagunensis Van Denburgh, 1895. The San
Lucan Skink “has a disjunct distribution throughout southern
Baja California...In the Cape Region, it is restricted to the
Sierra La Laguna and associated eastern foothills. North of the
Cape Region, it is known from four localities: the vicinity of
the Comondts; Santa Agueda, approximately 150 km to the
north...; northern Sierra Guadalupe; and San Francisco de
la Sierra...” (Grismer 2002: 237-238). This individual came
from La Purisima, Baja California Sur, in the municipality of
Comondu. In this study its EVS was judged as 13, placing it
at the upper limit of the medium vulnerability category. The
IUCN assessed its conservation status as Least Concern (LC),
and SEMARNAT indicated it as a species of Special Protection
(Pr). Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
The 10" rank is held by the BCCFR, the Baja
California Coniferous Forest Region, which includes the
following four high vulnerability species:
Batrachoseps major (14)
Sceloporus vandenburgianus (14)
Lampropeltis multifasciata (14)
Thamnophis elegans (14)
All four of these species are non-endemics, and they all
have EVS values of 14.
Natural Protected Areas in the Baja California
Peninsula and its Adjacent Islands
Natural Protected Areas
In Mexico, natural protected areas (ANPs, from the
Spanish acronym for “Areas Naturales Protegidas” or
NPAs for “Natural Protected Areas” in English) are those
established to preserve natural environments among the
different landscapes of the country for the conservation
of endemic and endangered species, as well as for
maintaining their genetic diversity and for promoting
sustainable use and scientific research.
The Baja California Peninsula contains 30 NPAs,
which are divided into the following six categories:
National Parks, Biosphere Reserves, Flora and Fauna
Protection Areas, State Parks, State Reserves, and
Voluntarily Designated Conservation Areas (Areas
Designadas Voluntariamente ala Conservacion, or ADVC
for the Spanish acronym). Of these, 17 are administrated
at the federal level and two at the state level, while the
remaining 11 are private (Table 20). Twenty-five of the
NPAs are terrestrial and five are marine reserves. The
NPAs were created between the years 1947 and 2022,
with Sierra San Pedro Martir National Park being the first
reserve established in the Baja California Peninsula.
Terrestrial NPAs cover slightly more than 73,000
km’, which corresponds to 49.5% of the total area of
the Baja California Peninsula and its associated islands.
The marine protected areas cover about 17,268 km? of
marine habitat. Two NPAs are the largest in Mexico.
The El Vizcaino Biosphere Reserve in Baja California
Sur is the largest in the country, followed by the Area
de Proteccion de Flora y Fauna Valle de los Cirios in the
state of Baja California, and each of these NPAs covers
more than 20,000 km/? of areal extension. Together they
cover 56% of the total area designed for the protection
of biodiversity and natural resources in the peninsula.
In addition to the considerable protected land area
represented by the NPAs, these areas are distributed in all
10 of the physiographic regions throughout the peninsula
(Table 20), and thus represent all of its ecosystems.
Eleven natural protected areas are privately owned,
primarily in such large areas as Valle de los Cirios
and El Vizcaino, which contain several towns and
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
ranches. Although conservation objectives often are not
compatible with the activities of the landowners (e.g.,
agriculture and cattle ranching), the federal governmental
institutions promote agreements with them on the proper
use of their resources, as well as in environmental
education to properly carry out the management
programs. Some of the Pacific Islands are inhabited, such
as Cedros, Natividad, Guadalupe, Magdalena, and Santa
Margarita, but the users do not own the land; and in most
cases their use is primarily dedicated to fishing activities.
For this reason, several NGOs collaborate with the staff
of the NPAs to carry out adequate management programs
and environmental education for the proper management
of the resources, and also to avoid the introduction of
non-native species into the islands. In areas such as the
Sierra San Pedro Martir, however, relationships with the
landowners are complicated, as they use the core areas of
the NPAs for cattle ranching.
Regarding herpetofaunal inventories, only six of
the 23 terrestrial areas (26.1%) have conducted them.
This situation highlights the general lack of sufficient
herpetological surveys in these areas. In all seven of
the marine reserves, five species of turtles are known
to inhabit these areas (Chelonia mydas, Caretta caretta,
Lepidochelys_ olivacea, Eretmochelys imbricata, and
Dermochelys coriacea), in addition to the Yellow-
bellied Sea Snake (Hydrophis platurus). Only one of
these marine areas, Complejo Lagunar Ojo de Liebre, is
located in the Pacific Ocean, and the remainder are in the
Gulf of California.
Effectiveness of the Natural Protected Areas in the
Baja California Peninsula and Its Adjacent Islands
The available information on the distribution of the
herpetofaunal species known to occur within the NPAs
in the Baja California Peninsula and its adjacent islands
are shown in Table 21, and the results are summarized
in Table 22. The data in these tables indicate that 157
(91.3%) of the 172 total species known from this
region of Mexico have been recorded in one to 25 of
the 30 NPAs. Thus, 15 species recorded from the Baja
California Peninsula and its adjacent islands have not
been recorded from any of the NPAs, and therefore are
not included in Table 21. These 15 species are: Anaxyrus
woodhousii, Incilius alvarius, Smilisca baudinii***,
Xenopus laevis***, Lithobates berlandieri***, L.
forreri***, L. yavapaiensis, Crotaphytus grismeri**,
Gehyra mutilata***, Uma _ notata, Xantusia
sherbrookei**, Thamnophis marcianus, Kinosternon
integrum*** Gopherus morafkai, and Apalone
spinifera***, Seven of these 15 species (indicated by
triple asterisks) are non-native to the Baja California
Peninsula and its adjacent islands, and thus are not
desirable for inclusion in any of the NPAs. Therefore,
only eight species (the two country endemics indicated
by double asterisks and the six non-endemics) should
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
No. 29. Aspidoscelis catalinensis. The Isla Santa Catalina
Whiptail “is endemic to Isla Santa Catalina, in the Gulf of
California, Baja California Sur” (Grismer 2002: 230). In this
study its EVS was estimated as 17, placing it in the middle
portion of the high vulnerability category. The IUCN judged
its conservation status as Vulnerable (VU), and SEMARNAT
assessed it as a species of Special Protection (Pr). Photo by Tim
Warfel.
No. 31. Aspidoscelis labialis (Stejneger, 1890). The Baja
California Whiptail “ranges along a narrow strip of the Pacific
coast, from Punta San José just south of Ensenada south to at
least 6 km southeast of Guerrero Negro. It generally extends
no more than 16 km inland...in the northern Vizcaino Desert
and even less so farther north” (Grismer 2002: 220). This
individual was found at Guerrero Negro, Baja California
Sur, in the municipality of Mulegé. In this study its EVS was
estimated as 15, placing it in the lower portion of the high
vulnerability category. The IUCN judged its conservation status
as Vulnerable (VU), and SEMARNAT listed it as a species of
Special Protection (Pr). Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
throated Whiptail occurs “from Orange and San Bernardino
counties of southern California south to Cabo San Lucas...”
(Grismer 2002: 212). This individual came from Rancho Meling,
Sierra San Pedro Martir, Baja California, in the municipality of
San Quintin. In this study its EVS was determined as 10, placing
it at the lower limit of the medium vulnerability category. The
IUCN evaluated its conservation status as Least Concern (LC),
and SEMARNAT judged it as Threatened (A). Photo by Jorge
H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
No. 32. Aspidoscelis maximus (Cope, 1863). The Cape Region
Whiptail is distributed in the Cape Region from Bahia La Paz
to Cabo San Lucas, including the Gulf islands of Partida Sur
and Espiritu Santo (Grismer 2002). This individual was located
at Sierra Las Cacachilas, in the municipality of La Paz. In this
study its EVS was calculated as 14, placing it at the lower limit
of the high vulnerability category. The IUCN has not assessed
the conservation status of this species, but it was evaluated by
SEMARNAT as a species of Special Protection (Pr). Photo by
Alan Harper.
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
OZU9I0'T]
ON ON Vv spurs] JIN [elope] uNUING ues 8 Thr 8s s00z Adv ¢z jeuoneN onbieg ues ap oseigidiyory
[op Bulle eU07
npuowlog ‘esornyjy B1esorg BIUIOFITCD
SOA +x #*ON V spue]s] 9Utoed [elopoy ‘UNUING URS ETT IOI 910¢ 99d L el ape AIOSOY eleg op eynsuruag e]
‘opeuasuy “euentiy, ap ooyloed [Op Seysy
’ BIOFSOI
spurs] syle emer | ees TIL6 OLY S00z Ady ¢Z el op x ‘ oo odnjepend ejs]
ae aca | vuney A e10
spur|sy JIND jexoped Pee ONO. | eoece pee 861 BnyZ ap ugiooatord eee
ueg ‘odijoJ AD et SP OF[OD JOP SeIs]
ues ‘TTROTXOP[ Pry
he 6107 AIT ‘TT
OUIvOZI OIVALL ulmjuingd ue < ; ;
adijoq eune,y A eIOpy
OUIBOZIA, [eJopof ueg “UNUINd URS 9L86 ICSC O86l UNL c OP U9I999} 01 SOLID) SO] Op OPA
op valy
OuTROZTA OICALI, uljuind ue ‘169° a) Sie aD ue EL
“pIUIOpIeD yA yu! S C169 € €107 PO FC STIR [eINIEN PAIOSOY
PIUIOJITC OICATI uljurn?) ue Id pene,
UOJITe Hd yu! Ss V £08 L10C JV 81 UO [eIMN PAIOSOYy
BIUIOFITC OIWATI unuIn() ue a) OZEIN
IUJOJI Te) yA yu! Ss o CEB vIOT PO 07 pyung [eINyeN| PAIOSOY
BIULOJI[ED 2181S unuing ues LOZ LZOT UPL ZZ HIN
aia © a ues [BINIVN PAIOSOY
jSO1OY SNOJOJTUOL) ‘ 610C MW ‘WT
ei ges aed [elope epeuosuq LOI6TL Lp6l dv 97 JeuoroeN onbieg IIR OIPag URS BIIDIS
erusosre| eleg ‘7
ATCA odijay F BIOISOIG OpeIOTOD OTy Jap eIjeq A
OpeIO[OD JOMO'T reroper ues ‘TTROTXO| Ove | 661 UNL Ol BR] Op VAIOSOY BIULOJI[ED Op OF[ODH OV
bitte Celene tena [elope epeuosuq ¢'600‘°S Z96I IdV LZ JeuoroeN onbieg LS8I op uoIonsuOD
erusosre_ eleg “Patel
pojo,dur0s
aquyivae ued Lo eee SIJUMOPUP] aquyiwae SUOISA.1 wonspsune sanredroranyy (ey) vary 99.199p Ar082907
yUOWIaSvURy] jeuneyoyodsex] Aq poidn339 SOV aydvasorsdyd jo avg
"SIOJISIA JOJ SOII[IOVJ = A pure ‘sAeMmuyed Jo Wiss = § ‘sprens yled = yY
‘SOOTAIOS OATICIISIUTLUPL = VY :SMOT[OJ SB SIV ULUNTOD SIQGLITVAB SOI} [IOV] IY} Ul SUOTIVIADIQGY “OOTXO|J “V[NSUTUDY BIUIOJITED eleg oY} UI SvdITY Pd}d9}0Ig [eINJEN OY} FO SONSTIDOLICYD “OZ IQeBI,
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
118
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
-Garcia et al.
Anny Peralta
vuney A eIOLy
jeordoLy, plry [elope soqey so’] 966 €L6I AON 67 ap UOTIIDII01g seon’] ues oqea
op valy
[eoidoly, plry 2181S soqeyd so] ALS P66l ULL OT JeuoroeN onbieg OPO
[ep gso¢ ues ap O1O}Sq
svOd JIND yenuad pees | sonoser TZ S661 Une 9 JeuoroeN onbieg owyng oqea
BUNSP’'T PLIDIS [elope sogey soy ‘ze &'] LEVI P66l UNL 9 erossord eUNSe’T BT PLIDIS
BR] Op PAIOSOY
eune, A eIOL J
sBOr) FIND [eyus) [elope Zed BT LIST CLOT AON OF 9p UOID99} 01 vipueleg
op voly
ours
Jsvog FIND jenusag ‘elope Zeq eT 8° bS9'°8P LOOZ ABW OI jeuorjeN onbieg nuidsq op osejardimory
Jep euLeyy] eUOZ
‘ bas oe ‘ ‘ A ‘AL TIL ‘TL T 9fenzoyod
seo) FIND yenus+) p sewa | marron 1'S78 9 610c VIO? E107 AOGV [2 [eINPN BAIOSOY
, I] eusjepseyy op
spueys] JIND pores | oper L'08S°907 9661 If 61 jeuoneN onbieg OJ910'T op eIYyea
uoqr ley]
OUTBOZTA, oyBALI 9so[nN C 8ES Z1OT APN € AOGV ~[eqojst) uesg OYyoUeY
BOISO[ONY SIQUINPIAIOS
oureoziA [elope] a3ain Z06L‘9rS'7 | 8861 AON OF eee oureoziA Id
ie ; PR] Op PAIOSOY ert
9so[N < BIOISO a1ger'y op
eee “‘unjuIN?) ues 6c£ 6L 0861 TRIN 8¢ PR] Op BAIOSOY ofg seunse’T ofayduiog
BIoysolg sopondisyes A seuoyyeq
spueys] JIN [e1opof UNUING ues 6 956 L8E Looc une ¢ epape AIOSOY op sojeueD ‘sojasuy so]
op elyeg eulieyy BUOZ
aquyivae ued posites s1JUMOpUP] Iquyrwaw SUOISA.1 99.199p
: AJAIMS : : UOTJIIpsine sorpedrorunyy (ey) vary K1099}8D
yUOWIISvUR jeuneyoyodaey] Aq paidn399 SOV aydevasorsdyg joajvg
"SIOPISIA IOJ SOTI[IOVJ = A pure ‘sAemuyed Jo widajsks = § ‘spslens yled = Y SSOOIAIJOS SATTEIISIUTLUPe
= V ‘SMO][OJ SB SIV UWINIOS SOIP]IOVJ I[QLIIVAV SOIP[IOV OY) Ul SUOTIVIADIQGY “OSTXOP ‘V[NSuIUDY BIUIOFIeD vleg dU} UI SvdTY Pd}dd}01g [LINEN OY} JO SoNsioOVIeYD *“(ponuIyUo0d) QZ Iquy,
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
119
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
No. 33. Xantusia henshawi Stejneger, 1893. The Granite Night
Lizard “ranges from western Riverside County, California,
south into northwestern Baja California, to at least Cafion el
Cajon of the Sierra San Pedro Martir in the east and Valle la
Trinidad in the west...” (Grismer 2002: 233). This individual
was found at Rancho Meling, Sierra San Pedro Martir, in the
municipality of San Quintin. Its EVS was indicated as 11,
placing it in the lower portion of the medium vulnerability
category. The IUCN determined its conservation status as Least
Concern (LC), but this species is not listed by SEMARNAT.
Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
No. 35. Lichanura trivirgata Cope, 1861. The Rosy Boa
“ranges widely throughout the Mojave and Sonoran deserts of
the southwestern United States and northern Mexico, as well
as coastal regions of southern California...In Baja California,
L. trivirgata occurs in all areas...except for the upper eleva-
tions of the northern Peninsular Ranges...and the Sierra La
Laguna” (Grismer 2002: 260). This individual was found on
Isla Cedros, in the municipality of Ensenada. In this study
its EVS was estimated as 10, placing it at the lower limit
of the medium vulnerability category. The IUCN judged its
conservation status as Least Concern (LC), and SEMARNAT
calculated it as Threatened (A). Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-
Villavicencio.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 120
No. 34. Xantusia wigginsi Savage, 1952. Wiggins’ Night Lizard
ranges from southern San Diego County, California southward
to northeastern Baja California Sur (http://californiaherps.
com; accessed 11 December 2022). This individual came from
south of Catavifia, Baja California, in the municipality of San
Quintin. The species EVS was determined as 11, placing it at
the lower portion of the medium vulnerability category. This
species is not listed by either the IUCN or SEMARNAT. Photo
by Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
No. 36. Arizona pacata Klauber, 1946. The Peninsular Glossy
Snake “ranges along the Pacific coast of the southern two-thirds
of Baja California from at least the turnoff to Bahia de los
Angeles south to 20 km north of La Paz” (Grismer 2002: 265).
This individual was found in Guerrero Negro, Baja California
Sur, in the municipality of Mulegé. In this study its EVS was
determined as 14, placing it at the lower limit of the high
vulnerability category. The IUCN assessed its conservation
status as Least Concern (LC), but this snake is not listed by
SEMARNAT. Photo by Tim Warfel.
ae
td
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
Shee’ Ee aes
No. 37. Bogertophis rosaliae (Mocquard, 1899). The Baja
California Rat Snake occurs “throughout the rocky slopes of the
Peninsular Ranges from Mountain Springs, San Diego County,
California, south to Cabo San Lucas...” (Grismer 2002: 266).
This individual came from the Sierra Las Cacachilas, Baja
California Sur, in the municipality of La Paz. In this study its
EVS was estimated as 11, placing it in the medium vulnerabilty
category. The IUCN assessed its conservation status as Least
Concern (LC), but this species is not listed by SEMARNAT.
Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
‘Gee ee
lus (Cope, 1861). The Cape Striped
Racer “is known only from the Cape Region of Baja California,
along the eastern slopes of the Sierra La Laguna...” (Grismer
2002: 286). This individual came from San Bartolo, Baja
California Sur, in the municipality of La Paz. In this study
its EVS was calculated as 15, placing it in the lower portion
of the high vulnerability category. The IUCN assessed its
conservation status as Least Concern (LC), and SEMARNAT
determined its conservation status as Threatened (A). Photo by
Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
No. 39. Masticophis fuliginosus (Cope, 1895). The Baja
California Coachwhip “ranges from extreme southwestern
California south to Cabo San Lucas” (Grismer 2002: 290). This
individual was encountered in the Sierra Las Cacachilas, Baja
California Sur, in the municipality of La Paz. In this study its
EVS was estimated as 9, placing it at the upper limit of the low
vulnerability category. This species is not listed by either the
IUCN or SEMARNAT. Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 121
No. 40. Pituophis vertebralis (Blainville, 1835). The Baja
California Gopher Snake “is endemic to Baja California
peninsula, ranging continuously throughout cismontane areas
from at least 43 km south (by road) of El Rosario south to
Cabo San Lucas...” (Grismer 2002: 298). This individual was
found in the Sierra Las Cacachilas, Baja California Sur, in the
municipality of La Paz. In this study its EVS was determined
as 13, placing it at the upper limit of the medium vulnerability
category. The IUCN assessed its conservation status as Least
Concern (LC), but this snake is not listed by SEMARNAT.
Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Table 21. Distribution of herpetofaunal species in the Natural Protected Areas of the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico. Abbreviations are
as follows: * = species endemic to Mexico; ** = species endemic to Baja California; and *** = non-native species. The numbers of the
Natural Protected Areas signify the following: 1 = Constitucion de 1857; 2 = Alto Golfo y Delta del Rio Colorado; 3 = Arroyo San Miguel;
4 = Sierra San Pedro Martir; 5 = Los Montes de San Pedro; 6 = Reserva Natural San Quintin; 7 = Reserva Natural Punta Mazo; 8 = Reserva
Natural Monte Ceniza; 9 = Reserva Natural Valle Tranquilo; 10 = Valle de los Cirios; 11 = Costa Salvaje Wildlands; 12 = Islas del Golfo
de California; 13 = Isla Guadalupe; 14 = Islas del Pacifico de la Peninsula de Baja California; 15 = Zona Marina del Archipielago de San
Lorenzo; 16 = Zona Marina Bahia de los Angeles, Canales de Ballenas y Salsipuedes; 17 = Complejo Lagunar Ojo de Liebre; 18 = El
Vizcaino; 19 = Servidumbre Ecologica Rancho San Cristébal-Majiben; 20 = Bahia de Loreto; 21 = Reserva Ecologica Llanos de Magdalena;
22 = Reserva Natural El Portezuelo; 23 = Santa Martha; 24 = Zona marina del Archipiélago de Espiritu Santo; 25 = Balandra; 26 = Non-
Such; 27 = Sierra La Laguna; 28 = Cabo Pulmo; 29 = Estero de San José del Cabo; and 30 = Cabo San Lucas.
Te PP Poof Pos [as [as [6] [8 [9 [a0 [aa [22 [a3 [2a 25 [20 [27 [28 09
pemmncmss TET PETE
Anura (11 species)
ANAXYVUus boreas
=
Bufonidae (4 species) [|
fal
Anaxyrus californicus
Anaxyrus cognatus +
Anaxyrus punctatus
al
[id
A
ylidae (2 species) [|
Ea
eel
Fa]
Pseudacris cadaverina
Pseudacris hypochondriaca
Ranidae (3 species)
ithobates catesbeianus*** ie a
Rana draytonii
Rana boylii
Scaphiopodidae (2 species)
caphiopus couchii +
ii +
Caudata (3 species)
Plethodontidae (3 species)
im
a
a
-
Ea
LJ
f)
Aneides lugubris |
3)
al
=
|
[|
[al
a
Batrachoseps major
nsatina eschscholtzii
REPTILIA (143 species)
Squamata (135 species)
Anguidae (5 species)
Igaria cedrosensis**
Igaria multicarinata +
Igaria nana**
Igaria paucicarinata**
Igaria velazquezi*
A nniellidae (2 species)
Anniella geronimensis**
Anniella stebbinsi
Bipedidae (1 species)
Bipes biporus** T
Crotaphytidae (4 species)
Crotaphytus insularis**
Crotaphytus vestigium
Gambelia copeii**
Cl
[al
[EJ]
[ial
[
[ial
ia
fl
ii]
a
iS
i
fl
Ea
i
[=|
=
i
[=
]
[=]
[mal
bz]
Gambelia wisli
Eublepharidae (3 species) [|
Coleom gypsicous** || P(e aC Li
Coleonx switak fale ca isa] hes PS ST esi ft tS] aS et
EP aed Pe PS Pa a
Zenit
pea hammondii
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 122 November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
Lt ee
aki Bre cs ee
No. 41. Salvadora hexalepis (Cope, 1866). The Western Patch-
nosed Snake is distributed “through much of the American
southwest and most of northwestern Mexico. In Baja California,
S. hexalepis ranges throughout the entire peninsula. ..except for
the upper elevations of the Sierra Juarez and Sierra San Pedro
Martir...It is known from the Pacific islands of San Geronimo
and Todos Santos and from the Gulf islands of Espiritu Santo,
San José, and Tiburon” (Grismer 2002: 303). This individual
was found in the Sierra Las Cacachilas, Baja California Sur,
in the municipality of La Paz. Its EVS was calculated as 9,
placing it at the higher limit of the low vulnerability category.
The IUCN assessed its conservation status as Least Concern
(LC), but this species is not listed by SEMARNAT. Photo by
Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
§
No. 43. Sonora fasciata (Cope, 1892). The Banded Sand Snake
is distributed “from the central Baja California Peninsula at least
as far north as Las Tres Virgenes to southern Baja California
Sur near El Triunfo” (Cox et al. 2018). This individual came
from near Loreto, Baja California Sur, in the municipality of
Loreto. In this study its EVS was assessed as 12, placing it in
the higher portion of the middle vulnerability category. This
Species is not listed by the IUCN, but SEMARNAT lists it as
a species of Special Protection (Pr). Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-
Villavicencio.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
e 5
» rhe
No. 42. Sonora annulata (Baird, 1859). The Shovel-nosed Snake
is distributed “in the Colorado and Sonoran Deserts of Arizona
and California in the USA, and in the states of Baja California
and Sonora in Mexico” (Cox et al. 2018). “In Baja California,
S. annulata is restricted to the Lower Colorado Valley Region,
extending 34 km south of San Felipe” (Grismer 2002: 271).
This individual was located at Restaurant El Michoacan, El
Chinero, Baja California in the municipality of Mexicali. The
species EVS was calculated as 14, placing it at the lower limit
of the high vulnerability category. This snake is not listed by
either IUCN or SEMARNAT. Photo by Tim Warfel.
RSG
No. 44. Hypsiglena slevini Tanner, 1943. The Slevin’s Night
Snake occurs from near Puertecitos in the north (Murray et
al. 2015) and “ranges continuously from at least Bahia de
los Angeles in the north to Cabo San Lucas in the south...It
is also known from Isla Santa Margarita, of the west coast of
Baja California...and from Islas Cerralvo and Danzante in the
Gulf of California” (Grismer 2002: 273). This individual came
from Sierra la Gata, Baja California Sur, in the municipality
of La Paz. In this study its EVS is noted as 11, placing it in
the lower portion of the medium vulnerability category. The
IUCN assessed its conservation status as Least Concern (LC),
but SEMARNAT judged its conservation status as Threatened
(A). Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
Bs ve
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Table 21 (continued). Distribution of herpetofaunal species in the Natural Protected Areas of the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico.
Abbreviations are as follows: * = species endemic to Mexico; ** = species endemic to Baja California; and *** = non-native species. The
numbers of the Natural Protected Areas signify the following: 1 = Constitucion de 1857; 2 = Alto Golfo y Delta del Rio Colorado; 3 =
Arroyo San Miguel; 4 = Sierra San Pedro Martir; 5 = Los Montes de San Pedro; 6 = Reserva Natural San Quintin; 7 = Reserva Natural Punta
Mazo; 8 = Reserva Natural Monte Ceniza; 9 = Reserva Natural Valle Tranquilo; 10 = Valle de los Cirios; 11 = Costa Salvaje Wildlands;
12 = Islas del Golfo de California; 13 = Isla Guadalupe; 14 = Islas del Pacifico de la Peninsula de Baja California; 15 = Zona Marina del
Archipielago de San Lorenzo; 16 = Zona Marina Bahia de los Angeles, Canales de Ballenas y Salsipuedes; 17 = Complejo Lagunar Ojo
de Liebre; 18 = El Vizcaino; 19 = Servidumbre Ecologica Rancho San Cristébal-Majiben; 20 = Bahia de Loreto; 21 = Reserva Ecologica
Llanos de Magdalena; 22 = Reserva Natural El Portezuelo; 23 = Santa Martha; 24 = Zona marina del Archipiélago de Espiritu Santo; 25 =
Balandra; 26 = Non-Such; 27 = Sierra La Laguna; 28 = Cabo Pulmo; 29 = Estero de San José del Cabo; and 30 = Cabo San Lucas.
BE [oo Po Ps [is [as [a6 [or] ow [9 [0 [aa [a2 25 [20 [8 [26 [27 [28 [29
Femina [|
femidcoas ion [|
fguniase Oeste) |_|
Ctenoscra hemiopna®™ |_|
Dinsscurasctatnensoe> |_|
Dipsscurasdosats |_|
sana riotopar™™ |_|
Scuomaiucater |_|
Scuromaius spin |_|
Scuromalustanber®™ |_|
a
ia
ia
Bi
a!
ii
=
Bl
al
+
Phrynosomatidae (29 species
:
Pinynosomacermense™™ |
Pinyosome corona |
Pinynosomamecati____|
Pinynosomea planes |_|
Seeopornsangnsns™= |_|
Seeloporns grandaen™™ |_|
Seetopornsnsaker™ |__|
Seeoporwstich®™ |_|
Seeopornstneantae™ |_|
Seeopornsmagiver | _
Seetoporn oceidenats | =
Seetopornsoreui [>
Seeoporn vandenburgtms | = |
Sceoporuszoxeroma*® |
eli
i
im
Fal
eal
al
Pai
Ez]
i
J
Cl
ail
+
BRRRERE BREE
EERE BERR
EERE BERR
BERTGEE BERR
+{ || i+] [+i TT +t +] |
+{ | Tt i+] +i TT +] +] dT di
Ea
Ka
Ei
Ei
+
—
et
=
=
ES
Phyllodactylidae (5 species)
+
ERR eRe ERE
i eA kJ 3 I) = EY SP I
eT fe a
SERRE EeSEEREERReRARE BER
BERDER ERE eee
SEC ESRI FS aes eis)
Es ES SSSI Sf ee CE I ATS)
ee Se Sl Sis eas)
EE SERESRERRERREREEREREERERREEe ESR
A SERRE RRR BREE
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 124 November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
o
No. 45. Rena boettgeri (Werner, 1899). The Cape Threadsnake
is distributed at “low elevations (up to 300 m) in the Cape
region of the Baja California Peninsula (Isthmus of La Paz to
Cabo San Lucas) and on Isla Cerralvo” (Heimes 2016: 27).
This individual came from La Paz, Baja California Sur, in the
municipality of La Paz. In this study its EVS was estimated
as 14, placing it at the lower limit of the high vulnerability
category. This species is not listed by either the IUCN or
SEMARNAT. Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
Western Terrestrial Garter Snake “ranges continuously from
southwestern Canada, south through the western United
States to central Nevada, Arizona, and New Mexico, nearly
to the edges of the Mojave and Sonoran deserts. It is known
from isolated populations in the Sierra Nevada and the San
Bernardino Mountains of California as well as central New
Mexico...In Baja California, 7’ elegans occurs in another
isolated population from the Sierra San Pedro Martir” (Grismer
2002: 308). This individual came from La Grulla, Sierra San
Pedro Martir, in the municipality of Ensenada. In this study its
EVS was calculated as 14, placing it at the lower limit of the
high vulnerability category. The IUCN judged its conservation
status as Least Concern (LC), but SEMARNAT assessed it as
Threatened (A). Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
ee ee -* A EOE EE a Yongkang 3
= OTRO tn WSEAS
No. 46. Rena humilis (Baird and Girard, 1853). The Western
Threadsnake “ranges throughout the southwestern United
States and western Mexico” (Heimes 2016: 30). This individual
was found in Ensenada, Baja California, in the municipality of
Ensenada. In this study its EVS was determined as 8, placing
it in the upper portion of the low vulnerability category. The
IUCN judged its conservation status as Least Concern (LC), but
this threadsnake is not listed by SEMARNAT. Photo by Jorge
H. Valdez-Villavicencio.
. ca wy a :
wee ae, Y. MV ee ag
se; Ve NS eo Se a a
No. 48. Thamnophis validus (Kennicott, 1860). The West
Coast Garter Snake “has a fragmented distribution along the
west coast of southwestern Mexico from southern Sonora
south to Guerrero...In Baja California, it also has a fragmented
distribution and is known from water systems near La
Burrera along the western face of the Sierra La Laguna and
the watercourses and systems associated with Santiago, Agua
Caliente, and Miraflores along the eastern face of the Sierra
La Laguna” (Grismer 2002: 312). This individual is from
Miraflores, Baja California Sur, in the municipality of Los
Cabos. In this study its EVS was determined as 11, placing
it in the lower portion of the medium vulnerability category.
The IUCN assessed its conservation status as Least Concern
(LC), but this species is not listed by SEMARNAT. Photo by
Tim Warfel.
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Table 21 (continued). Distribution of herpetofaunal species in the Natural Protected Areas of the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico.
Abbreviations are as follows: * = species endemic to Mexico; ** = species endemic to Baja California; and *** = non-native species. The
numbers of the Natural Protected Areas signify the following: 1 = Constitucion de 1857; 2 = Alto Golfo y Delta del Rio Colorado; 3 = Arroyo
San Miguel; 4 = Sierra San Pedro Martir; 5 = Los Montes de San Pedro; 6 = Reserva Natural San Quintin; 7 = Reserva Natural Punta Mazo;
8 = Reserva Natural Monte Ceniza; 9 = Reserva Natural Valle Tranquilo; 10 = Valle de los Cirios; 11 = Costa Salvaje Wildlands; 12 = Islas
del Golfo de California; 13 = Isla Guadalupe; 14 = Islas del Pacifico de la Peninsula de Baja California; 15 = Zona Marina del Archipielago
de San Lorenzo; 16 = Zona Marina Bahia de los Angeles, Canales de Ballenas y Salsipuedes; 17 = Complejo Lagunar Ojo de Liebre; 18 = El
Vizcaino; 19 = Servidumbre Ecolégica Rancho San Cristobal-Mayjiben; 20 = Bahia de Loreto; 21 = Reserva Ecologica Llanos de Magdalena;
22 = Reserva Natural El Portezuelo; 23 = Santa Martha; 24 = Zona marina del Archipiélago de Espiritu Santo; 25 = Balandra; 26 = Non-
Such; 27 = Sierra La Laguna; 28 = Cabo Pulmo; 29 = Estero de San José del Cabo; and 30 = Cabo San Lucas.
BET [eof Ps [as [as [ae [or] ow [09 [0 [aa [ae [25 20 [8 [26 [27 [28 [29
Pintodaannspane [| | |_| a
Pitodacyus nese |_|
Pitodacyussamar™ |_|
Senckne Gps) |_|
Peston ibers_____[ + |
Peston togineniee |_|
Peston stitontame —_[* |
shane (Sapien |_|
spose cams |_|
spose cameron |_|
spose catatnenis™™ |_|
ial
=
im
il
=
im
El
ia
Fal
Es
Kantasine Gapecy |_|
Fama giterine |_|
Fania viegins |_|
Charniine spec |_|
+
Lamoopeisctatnensisee |_|
Lameopetihererae™® |_|
+
SERRE oC OE CR ee
BRRERREEREEEREREEE 2 BEE BERR Be
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 126 November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
= a
No. 49. Crotalus angelensis Klauber, 1963. The Isla Angel de
la Guarda Rattlesnake “is endemic to Isla Angel de la Guarda
in the Gulf of California” (Grismer 2002: 333), from where this
individual originated. In this study its EVS was assessed as 18,
placing in the upper portion of the high vulnerability category.
The IUCN judged its conservation status as Least Concern
(LC), but this rattlesnake is not listed by SEMARNAT. Photo
by Tim Warfel.
No. 51. Crotalus polisi Meik, Schaack, Flores-Villelam
and Streicher, 2018. The Isla Cabeza de Caballo Speckled
Rattlesnake or Horsehead Island Speckled Rattlesnake is
endemic to Isla Cabeza de Caballo Island in the Gulf of
California, municipality of San Quintin. The species EVS
was calculated as 19. The species is not listed by the IUCN,
but SEMARNAT assessed its conservation status as Special
Protection (Pr). Photo by Tim Warfel.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
fae ea oy or 7 . ba a he a
No. 50. Crotalus enyo (Cope, 1861). The Baja California
Rattlesnake “ranges throughout most of Baja California. In the
north, its contact with the Pacific coast occurs in the vicinity
of Cabo Colonet and with the Gulf coast near Bahia de los
Angeles. From here, C. enyo continues south throughout all
of Baja California...It is also known from the Pacific islands
of Magdalena and Santa Margarita and the Gulf islands of
Carmen, Cerralvo, Coronados, Espiritu Santo, Pardo, Partida
Sur, San Francisco, San José, and San Marcos...” (Grismer
2002: 328-329). This individual was found at Guerrero Negro,
Baja California Sur, in the municipality of Mulegé. In this
study its EVS was estimated as 13, placing it at the upper limit
of the medium vulnerability category. The IUCN assessed its
conservation status as Least Concern (LC), but SEMARNAT
judged its status as Threatened (A). Photo by Jorge H. Valdez-
Villavicencio.
rot
Aa, Lie ?
- Aa
thew, by aie a)
ae oe
No. 52. Crotalus pyrrhus (Cope, 1866). The Southwestern
Speckled Rattlesnake is distributed from southeastern Nevada,
western Arizona, and southern California southward into the
northern half of the Baja California Peninsula (Meik et al.
2015). This individual is from Rancho La Costilla, Sierra San
Pedro Martir, in the municipality of San Quintin. Its EVS was
assessed as 13, placing it at the upper limit of the medium
vulnerability category. This species is not listed by the IUCN,
but it is listed by SEMARNAT as a species of Special Protection
(Pr). Photo by Ivan Parr.
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Table 21 (continued). Distribution of herpetofaunal species in the Natural Protected Areas of the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico.
Abbreviations are as follows: * = species endemic to Mexico; ** = species endemic to Baja California; and *** = non-native species. The
numbers of the Natural Protected Areas signify the following: 1 = Constitucién de 1857; 2 = Alto Golfo y Delta del Rio Colorado; 3 =
Arroyo San Miguel; 4 = Sierra San Pedro Martir; 5 = Los Montes de San Pedro; 6 = Reserva Natural San Quintin; 7 = Reserva Natural Punta
Mazo; 8 = Reserva Natural Monte Ceniza; 9 = Reserva Natural Valle Tranquilo; 10 = Valle de los Cirios; 11 = Costa Salvaje Wildlands;
12 = Islas del Golfo de California; 13 = Isla Guadalupe; 14 = Islas del Pacifico de la Peninsula de Baja California; 15 = Zona Marina del
Archipielago de San Lorenzo; 16 = Zona Marina Bahia de los Angeles, Canales de Ballenas y Salsipuedes; 17 = Complejo Lagunar Ojo
de Liebre; 18 = El Vizcaino; 19 = Servidumbre Ecologica Rancho San Cristobal-Majiben; 20 = Bahia de Loreto; 21 = Reserva Ecoldégica
Llanos de Magdalena; 22 = Reserva Natural El Portezuelo; 23 = Santa Martha; 24 = Zona marina del Archipiélago de Espiritu Santo; 25 =
Balandra; 26 = Non-Such; 27 = Sierra La Laguna; 28 = Cabo Pulmo; 29 = Estero de San José del Cabo; and 30 = Cabo San Lucas.
Te ef eps Poppa [vs Jas] v6] 7 fas] 9 [a0] a1 [a2 [29 [26 [25 [20 [27 [28 [>> [a0
einem [sale olaleie|sf]e] |] |
suaiorneoes + [+ |_|
ee
ee Oe Se re
ema eae) eve lel ol he) abel ele [eed
aie |e
Crotalusarrox | TTL TL
Crotalus caratinensis** || oT oT TT tT tT ET | t+} TT TE TE ET tT ET
Crotalus cerastes | t+} | tT | tT | tT tT | TE ET
Crotatusenyor* | OT TT TT TT ede ed
OD Ee Ee
Crotalus micchettnt® TT TT | | dT TE TT et +t ee
Crotaluspotisit® | oT TT TT dT TE TT T+} ET EE TE ET EE
Grotiius pyri | Pee fe Pe ey ee ea
estat tiers aL eh] i [ae [a | | a lee [ef tise ef | ee [ea
Crotalus thatassoporus* ||} | TT oT tT tT TT t+} TE TT TE TE TE TT TE
restuaines (species) | {| | | | | | | | | | |} PP tT EE EE ET ET EE
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 128 November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
i
hi
*"
‘ {i
s<
No. 53. Crotalus ruber Cope, 1892. The Red Diamond
Rattlesnake is distributed from “Los Angeles County,
California, south throughout Baja California to Cabo San
Lucas...Crotalus ruber is known to occur on the Pacific islands
of Cedros and Santa Margarita...and the Gulf islands of Angel
de la Guarda, Danzante, Monserrat, Pond, San José, and San
Marcos...” (Grismer 2002: 322). This individual was found at
Rancho El Coyote, Sierra San Pedro Martir. The species EVS
was determined as 9, placing it at the upper limit of the low
vulnerability category. The IUCN assessed its conservation
staus as Least Concern (LC), and SEMARNAT judged it as a
species of Special Protection (Pr). Photo by Ivan Parr.
No. 55. Actinemys palli
da (Seeliger, 1945). The Southwestern Pond Turtle ranges from the central coast range south of the San
No. 54. Crotalus thalassoporus Meik, Schaack, Flores-Villela,
and Streicher, 2018. The Piojo Island Speckled Rattlesnake or
Louse Island Speckled Rattlesnake is endemic to Isla Piojo
in the Gulf of California, in the municipality of San Quintin.
Its EVS was assessed as 19, placing it in the upper portion
of the high vulnerability category. This species is not listed
by the IUCN, but SEMARNAT lists it as a species of Special
Protection (Pr). Photo by Tim Warfel.
a
Francisco Bay area to northwestern Baja California (http://www.reptile-database.org/, accessed 7 December 2022: Grismer 2002:
88), with a disjunct population in the central desert of Baja California (Valdez-Villavicencio et al. 2016). This individual came from
Arroyo Valladares, Baja California, in the municipality of San Quintin. In this study its EVS was assessed as 13, placing it at the
higher limit of the medium vulnerability category. This species is not listed by either the IUCN or SEMARNAT. Photo by Jorge H.
Valdez-Villavicencio.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 129 November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Table 21 (continued). Distribution of herpetofaunal species in the Natural Protected Areas of the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico.
Abbreviations are as follows: * = species endemic to Mexico; ** = species endemic to Baja California; and *** = non-native species. The
numbers of the Natural Protected Areas signify the following: 1 = Constitucion de 1857; 2 = Alto Golfo y Delta del Rio Colorado; 3 =
Arroyo San Miguel; 4 = Sierra San Pedro Martir; 5 = Los Montes de San Pedro; 6 = Reserva Natural San Quintin; 7 = Reserva Natural Punta
Mazo; 8 = Reserva Natural Monte Ceniza; 9 = Reserva Natural Valle Tranquilo; 10 = Valle de los Cirios; 11 = Costa Salvaje Wildlands;
12 = Islas del Golfo de California; 13 = Isla Guadalupe; 14 = Islas del Pacifico de la Peninsula de Baja California; 15 = Zona Marina del
Archipielago de San Lorenzo; 16 = Zona Marina Bahia de los Angeles, Canales de Ballenas y Salsipuedes; 17 = Complejo Lagunar Ojo
de Liebre; 18 = El Vizcaino; 19 = Servidumbre Ecologica Rancho San Cristébal-Majiben; 20 = Bahia de Loreto; 21 = Reserva Ecoldégica
Llanos de Magdalena; 22 = Reserva Natural El Portezuelo; 23 = Santa Martha; 24 = Zona marina del Archipiélago de Espiritu Santo; 25 =
Balandra; 26 = Non-Such; 27 = Sierra La Laguna; 28 = Cabo Pulmo; 29 = Estero de San José del Cabo; and 30 = Cabo San Lucas.
ET Poo Po Ps Ps Pas [a6 [07 [a8 [9 [0 [au [a2 [25 [2s [25 [26 [ar [28 [> [a0
See Cre
ee a
a
fremooneisinoricna | | ||111]111/[ |
Lenicchepw oivacea | | | ||| [11] ie] |
Dermocrewinecrwverey | | |||) >PPt yl
ermochelys coriacea | |_| | | | | | | | | t+] tet+t+t+] | te} tT tet tt dey fe
Emydidae@species) | | | | | | | | | tT | | | | tT | tT | TT EE TE
Herinemys marmorata || | t+ tT +t ToT | tet} | PT tT tT TE ET EE ET
rachemysnebuiosa** | | | ot tT tT tT tT tT tT TE EE ET TT T+#T TE TE
rachemys scripta*** || TL TT TT cE TT dP TT TT TT TE
frotatcis7species) | tT | | | | PT | PT PT PTE PE TT EE TE EE EE
eventually be located within one or more of the NPAs.
The most widely distributed species among the NPAs
is the phrynosomatid lizard Uta stansburiana, which has
been recorded from 25 of these areas. A sizeable number
of species (69 or 43.9%) have been recorded from only
one of the 30 NPAs (Table 21). The remaining 90 species
(57.3%) have been recorded in two to 24 NPAs.
In 29 of the 30 NPAs from which herpetofaunal
species have been recorded, the total numbers of species
range from six to 84 (Table 22). The allocations of these
species according to their distributional status are shown
in Table 22. Most of the 29 NPAs (22 or 75.9%) lack
non-native species, which is a desirable feature. The
other seven NPAs support from one to four non-native
species (x = 1.7 species). Each of the 29 NPAs have a
herpetofauna that contains some number of non-endemic
species, which ranges from six to 40. Most of these NPAs
also have some country endemic species, ranging from
one to 50; however, no country endemic species have
been recorded in eight of these areas. Usually the number
of non-endemic species exceeds that of the country
endemics, except for the Gulf of California Islands
(with 32 of the former and 50 of the latter), the Sierra La
Laguna (with 18 of the former and 20 of the latter), and
the Estero de San José del Cabo (with 15 of each of non-
endemic and country endemic species).
Only one of the 30 NPAs in the Baja California
Peninsula and its adjacent islands (Isla Guadalupe) lacks
a herpetofaunal survey of any magnitude. This island 1s
located 241 km off the western coast of the peninsula
and about 400 km southwest of Ensenada in the state of
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Baja California. This island and its surrounding islets and
waters are part of a biosphere reserve established in 2005
(Table 20). The absence of herpetofaunal documentation
on Isla Guadalupe is not due to a lack of effort on the
part of herpetologists, as several collecting efforts have
been made. For example, the San Diego Natural History
Museum sponsored an expedition there years ago, and
two authors of this paper (APG and JHVV) also have
been on this island and contacted people who are part of
an NGO at a base camp. However, none of these efforts
resulted in the finding of any amphibians or reptiles on
Isla Guadalupe; therefore, it is interesting that apparently
no amphibians, and especially no reptiles, have made it
to this island.
Of the 81 non-endemic species found in the
herpetofauna of the peninsula and its associated islands,
75 (92.6%) have been recorded among the region’s
NPAs. Of the 77 country endemic species known, 76
(98.7%) are established in protected areas. Fortunately,
only seven of the 14 non-native species (50%) have
populations established in any of the NPAs, and usually
they occur individually in any given area. Only one of
these seven non-native species (Hemidactylus frenatus)
occurs in more than a single NPA, and the number of
areas it occurs in 1s six (Table 21).
The Baja California Peninsula is a unique area of
Mexico, as nearly 30% of its land is protected. However,
comprehensive herpetological studies are still lacking for
most reserves, and the available surveys largely focus on
target species (endemics and NOM-S59 species). Since
several conservation threats affect the natural protected
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
Table 22. Summary of the distributional status of the herpetofaunal species in protected areas in the Baja California Peninsula,
Mexico, and adjacent islands. Total = total number of species recorded in a compendium of the listed protected areas.
Distributional status
Number
of Non: Cou Non-native
species endemic Endemic (NN)
(NE) (CE)
a
SS
a CO
a TT
a A
[Reserva Natural San Quintin ———OSOSCSC~—~—S—CSC‘“<~<;7<S;S;CSCSrYt
a
[ReservaNatural Monte Ceniza——SOSC~—~—S—“—sSC“‘—‘“‘~‘“‘“<;7<SC~
Se
2 TO
a TO
Islas del Pacifico dela Peninsulade BajaCalifomia ———~—~S~iSSC PC
[Zona Marina del Archipielago deSanLorenzo—~—S~C~—SC—~—i dP dT
| Zona Marina Bahia de los Angeles, Canales de Ballenasy Salsipuedes_—— | 6 | 6 | OT
| Complejo LagunarOjodeLiebre TE OC
[Servidumbre Beoldgica Rancho San CristibalMajiben ——~—~S~—~idSCSCi SS td
a
[Reserva Eoolégica Llanos de Magdalena ——=~=~“~*~*“‘“‘~*~*é‘“dCS*‘iSC‘“dSC‘iSSCPS Cd
PReservaNatural ElPoremelo—SSSCSC~—SC“‘“~*~*~‘“<~SSP a td
a TO
Zona marina del Archipiélago de Espiritu Santo Sa en ae ee ee |
a TO
a
[caboPumo—OOOC“‘CSCSSC~dSCO
[Estero de SaniosedelGabo——SOSC—~—~—“~*~*~*“‘“‘“<;7<2CS;SCSSt Pd
Cabo Santuces—OSOSC—C—SC—SsSC—SsSs—C—CSsSsSSP a
2
areas, a substantial amount of work is necessary to
achieve effective resource management and ensure the
conservation of the amphibian and reptile species in the BCCEFR and SLLR regions to 54 between the CGCR
Baja California Peninsula, both inside and outside of the and ATR regions. The Coefficient of Biogeographic
NPAs. Resemblance values range from 0.16 between
BCCER and GIR to 0.86 between CGCR and ATR.
The UPGMA dendrogram (Fig. 24) demonstrates
that the two most closely related regions are the
Central Gulf Coast Region and the Arid Tropical
Region, which are joined at the 0.86 level. These
two regions are joined at the 0.82 level with the
Magdalena Region. These three regions are joined
at the 0.74 level with the Vizcaino Region. These
Protected area
C. The number of species shared among the 10
geographic regions ranges from eight between the
Conclusions and Recommendations
Conclusions
A. The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
is comprised of 172 species, including 18 anurans,
three salamanders, 140 squamates (83 lizards and
57 snakes), and 11 turtles.
. The numbers of species known from the 10
geographic regions we recognize in the Baja
California Peninsula range from 27 in the Baja
California Coniferous Forest Region to 84 in the
Gulf Islands Region. The species occupy from one to
10 geographic regions, with a mean number of 3.3.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
four regions are joined at the 0.64 level with the
Sierra La Laguna Region. This group of five regions
in the southern portion of the Peninsula is joined to
the remaining regions in the northern portion of the
Peninsula and those in the Pacific Ocean and the Gulf
of California at the 0.52 level. Of the remaining five
regions, the ones most closely allied are the Pacific
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Islands Region and the California Region, joined at
the 0.62 level. These two regions are united to the
other three regions at the 0.51 level with the Lower
Colorado Valley Region. The eight previously
mentioned peninsular regions are joined to the
Gulf Islands Region at the 0.44 level. Finally, the
most distantly related region is the Baja California
Coniferous Forest Region, which is joined to all the
other regions at the 0.33 level.
. The level of herpetofaunal endemism in the Baja
California Peninsula is relatively high. Of the 158
species that make up the native herpetofauna, 77
are peninsular endemics (48.7%).
. The distributional status of the species that
comprise the herpetofauna of the Baja California
Peninsula is as follows (in order of category size):
non-endemics (81, 47.1%); peninsular endemics
(77, 43.6%); and non-natives (14, 8.1%).
. With respect to the distributional categories
instituted by Wilson et al. (2017), of the 81 non-
endemic species, 74 (91.4%) are in the MXUS
category, with one (1.2%) in the USCA category
and six (7.4%) in the OCEA category.
G. The principal environmental threats are land
conversion and habitat loss, water diversion and
overuse, invasive species, livestock grazing, illegal
trade, off-road activities, infectious diseases, and
climate change.
H. To evaluate the conservation status of the
herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula, we
used the SEMARNAT, IUCN, and EVS systems.
SEMARNAT lists 85 (53.8%) of the 158 native
species, including seven categorized as endangered
(P), 33 as threatened (A), and 45 as special
protection (Pr). A comparison of the SEMARNAT
and distributional categorizations demonstrates
that of the seven endangered species, all are non-
endemics; of the 33 threatened species, 13 are
non-endemics and 20 are peninsular endemics; and
of the 45 special protection species, 19 are non-
endemics and 26 are peninsular endemics.
. Application of the IUCN conservation status
evaluation categories to the herpetofauna of the
Baja California Peninsula indicates the following
distribution (by category and proportion): CR
(three, 1.9%); EN (four, 2.5%); VU (eight, 5.1%);
NT (seven, 4.4%); LC (108, 68.4%); DD (three,
1.9%); and NE (25, 15.8%).
. Application of the EVS system of conservation
assessment to the 152 non-marine native species
of the Baja California Peninsula indicates that the
categorical values increase from low scores (28
species, 18.4%) to medium scores (48 species,
31.6%), and then to high scores (76 species,
50.0%).
. A comparison of the IUCN and EVS conservation
status categorizations indicates that nine (11.8%)
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
of the 76 high vulnerability species (by EVS)
are allocated to one of the three IUCN “threat
categories” (CR, EN, or VU), and that 26 (92.9%)
of the 28 low vulnerability species are placed in the
LC category.
L. Application of the Relative Herpetofauna
Priority (RHP) measure demonstrates that
the most significant herpetofauna in the Baja
California Peninsula is that of the Gulf Islands
Region, inasmuch as it contains the highest
numbers of peninsular endemic species and high
vulnerability species. The ratings of seven of
the 10 geographic regions are the same whether
based on peninsular endemic species or high
vulnerability species.
M.Thirty protected areas are established in the Baja
California Peninsula, with 17 administered at the
federal level, two at the state level, and 11 at the
private level. The 30 protected areas comprise
almost one-half of the total area of the Baja
California Peninsula.
N. Of the 158 species that comprise the native
herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula,
only eight (two country endemics and six non-
endemics) are not represented in the system of
protected areas in the region. Of the 30 established
NPAs, only one (Isla Guadalupe) is not known to
contain any herpetofaunal species.
O. The most widely distributed species represented
with the system of NPAs is the lizard Uta
stansburiana, which occupies 25 of the 29
supporting herpetofaunal populations. Sixty-nine
species are known from only a single NPA, while
90 species occupy from two to 24 NPAs.
P. The total numbers of species occupying the 29
NPAs range from six to 84. Twenty-two of the
29 NPAs support no non-native species, which is
a desirable feature. A typical NPA supports more
non-native than country endemic species.
Q. Of the 83 non-endemic species recorded on the
peninsula and its associated islands, 75 (90.4%)
are known from among the region’s NPAs; of the
77 country endemics, 76 (98.7%) are represented.
The total representation is 151 of 158 species, or
95.6%, which is outstanding from a conservation
perspective. Also, of major interest from this
perspective, nearly 30% of the area in the Baja
California Peninsula is protected, even though
herpetofaunal surveys are unavailable for most of
the NPAs.
Recommendations
A. Prioritize the evaluation of species to be included
in NOM-059-SEMARNAT, based on those that
have high vulnerability EVS values, especially
peninsular endemics.
132 November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
B. Promote eradication programs for non-native
species, as both states in the peninsula have the
highest numbers of non-native amphibian and
reptile species in Mexico. These control and
eradication efforts are important to avoid future
detrimental effects on native species of amphibians
and reptiles.
C. Evaluate changes to the EVS criteria in order to
consider regional threats that affect species of
amphibians in desert areas.
D. Because herpetofaunal surveys have not been
conducted in many of the protected areas, this
remains a major goal for these areas in the future.
Achieving this goal will require a determination
of the presence or absence of the eight native
species that are not represented within the system
of protected areas.
E. Once the entire native herpetofauna is demonstrated
to occur within the confines of the system of
protected areas, monitoring programs can be
established to continually assess the health of the
populations of all species.
“In a country with phenomenal natural riches, Baja
California and its offshore islands stand out as a priceless
setting for studying the factors that shape ecological
communities, and they are replete with stunningly
beautiful locales for recreation and education. ”
Harry W. Greene (Foreword in Grismer, 2002)
Acknowledgments.—We thank Alan Harper, Felipe
Leon, Gerardo Marron, Ivan Parr, José Antonio Soriano,
Andrea Navarro Tiznado, and Tim Warfel for providing
some of the images utilized in this paper. We also are
grateful to Vitza Cabrera, Noé Lopez, Héctor M. Sanchez,
and Flor Torres for providing information on the natural
protected areas, and Rafael Lara Reséndiz for his help in
searching for climate and precipitation data. Finally, we
are thankful to Clark Mahrdt and an anonymous reviewer
for their helpful reviews of our manuscript.
Literature Cited
Adams A, Peralta-Garcia A, Flores-Lopez CA, Valdez-
Villavicencio JH, Briggs CJ. 2022. High fungal
pathogen loads and prevalence in Baja California
amphibian communities: the importance of species,
elevation, and historical context. Global Ecology and
Conservation 33: e01968.
Adams AJ, Pessier AP, Briggs CJ. 2017. Rapid extirpation
of a North American frog coincides with an increase
in fungal pathogen prevalence: historical analysis
and implications for reintroduction. Ecology and
Evolution 7. 10,216—10,232.
Aguirre-Mufioz A, Samaniego-Herrera A, Luna-
Mendoza L, Ortiz-Alcaraz A, Méndez-Sanchez
F, Hernandez-Montoya J. 2016. La restauracién
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
ambiental exitosa de las islas de México: una
reflexion sobre los avances a la fecha y los retos por
venir. Pp. 485-512 In: Experiencias Mexicanas en
la Restauracion de los Ecosistemas. Editors, Ceccon
E, Martinez-Garza C. UNAM, CRIM, UAEM and
CONABIO, México, DF, Mexico. 577 p.
Alvarado-Diaz J, Suazo-Ortufio I, Wilson LD, Medina-
Aguilar O. 2013. Patterns of physiographic distribution
and conservation status of the herpetofauna of
Michoacan, Mexico. Contribution to Special Mexico
Issue. Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 7. 128-170
(e71).
Alvarez-Borrego S. 2002. Physical oceanography. Pp.
41-59 In: A New Island Biogeography of the Sea of
Cortés. Editors, Case TJ, Cody ML, Ezcurra E. Oxford
University Press, New York, New York, USA. 690 p.
Alves-Ferreira G, Talora DC, Solé M, Cervantes-Lopez
MJ, Heming NM. 2022. Unraveling global impacts
of climate change on amphibian distributions: a life-
history and biogeographic-based approach. Frontiers
in Ecology and Evolution 10: 987237.
Arguelles-Méndez C, Ortega-Rubio A, Romero-Schmidt
H, Coria-Benet R, Solis-Marin F. 1996. Pacific
Treefrog population changes as a response to the
absence of livestock grazing. Herpetology 26: 1+.
Arnaud G, Martins M, Burguete-Trujillo L, Hernandez-
Rodriguez I, Avila-Villegas H, Murillo-Quero R,
Quijada-Mascarefias A. 2008. Historia natural de las
serpientes de cascabel Crotalus catalinensis, endémica
de la isla Santa Catalina, Golfo de California, México.
Pp. 93-100 In: Estudios de las Islas del Golfo de
California. Editor, Flores-Campafia LM. Universidad
Autonoma de Sinaloa-Gobierno del Estado de
Sinaloa-Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia,
México, DF, Mexico. 252 p.
Arriaga L. 2006. La peninsula de Baja California:
biodiversidad, conservacion y manejo de sus recursos
vegetales. Pp. 64-84 In: Manejo, Conservacion y
Restauracion de Recursos Naturales en México.
Coordinators, Oyama K, Castillo A. Siglo XXI,
México, DF, Mexico. 368 p.
Auliya M, Altherr S, Ariano-Sanchez D, Baard EH,
Brown C, Brown RM, Ziegler T. 2016. Trade in live
reptiles, its impact on wild populations, and the role
of the European market. Biological Conservation 204:
103-119.
Badan-Dangon A, Robles JM, Garcia J. 1989. Poleward
flows off Mexico’s Pacific coast. Pp. 176-202 In:
Poleward Flows Along Eastern Ocean Boundaries.
Coastal and Estuarine Studies, 34. Editors, Neshyba
SJ, Mooers CNK, Smith RL, Barber RT. Springer,
New York, New York, USA. 374 p.
Ballesteros-Barrera C, Tapia-Pérez O, Zarate-Hernandez
R, Leyte-Manrique A, Martinez-Bernal A, Vargas-
Miranda B, Martinez-Coronel M, Ortiz-Burgos S.
2022. The potential effect of climate change on the
distribution of endemic anurans from Mexico’s
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Tropical Dry Forest. Diversity 14: 650.
Barragan-Vazquez MDR, Rios Rodas L, Fucsko LA,
Porras LW, Mata-Silva V, Rocha A, DeSantis DL,
Garcia-Padilla E, Johnson JD, Wilson LD. 2022.
The herpetofauna of Tabasco, Mexico: composition,
distribution, and conservation status. Amphibian &
Reptile Conservation 16(2) [General Section]: 1-61
(e315).
Bellard C, Bertelsmeier C, Leadley P, Thuiller W,
Courchamp F. 2012. Impacts of climate change on the
future of biodiversity. Ecology Letters 15: 365-377.
Bellard C, Leclerc C, Courchamp F. 2013. Impact of
sea level rise on the 10 insular biodiversity hotspots.
Global Ecology and Biogeography 23: 203-212.
Bellard C, Marino C, Courchamp F. 2022. Ranking
threats to biodiversity and why it doesn’t matter.
Nature Communications 13: 2,616.
Blackburn TM, Bellard C, Ricciardi A. 2019. Alien
versus native species as drivers of recent extinctions.
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 17: 203-
207.
Blaustein AR, Walls SC, Bancroft BA, Lawler JJ, Searle
CL, Gervasi SS. 2010. Direct and indirect effects of
climate change on amphibian populations. Diversity
2: 281-313.
Bohm M, Collen B, Baillie JEM, Bowles P, Chanson J,
Cox N, Hammerson G, Hoffmann M, Livingstone SR,
Ram M, et al. 2013. The conservation status of the
world’s reptiles. Biological Conservation 157: 372-—
385.
Bolom-Huet R, Pineda E, Diaz-Fleischer F, Mufioz-
Alonso AL, Galindo-Gonzalez J. 2019. Known and
estimated distribution in Mexico of Batrachochytrium
dendrobatidis, a pathogenic fungus of amphibians.
Biotropica 51: 731-746.
Bostic DL. 1971. Herpetofauna of the Pacific coast
of north central Baja California, Mexico, with a
description of a new subspecies of Phyllodactylus
xanti. Transactions of the San Diego Society of
Natural History 16: 237-264.
Bury RB, Luckenbach RA, Busack SD. 1977. Effects
of Off-road Vehicles on Vertebrates in the California
Desert. Wildlife Research Report Number 8. United
States Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC,
USA. 23 p.
Bury RB, Welsh HH, Germano DJ, Ashton DT. 2012.
Western Pond Turtle: Biology, Sampling Techniques,
Inventory and Monitoring, Conservation, and
Management. Northwest Fauna Number 7. Society
for Northwestern Vertebrate Biology, Olympia,
Washington, USA. 128 p.
Busack SD, Bury RB. 1974. Some effects of off-road
vehicles and sheep grazing on lizard populations in
the Mojave Desert. Biological Conservation 6: 179-
183.
Carrillo-Guerrero Y. 2010. Diagnostico de la Cuenca de
La Paz. Reporte Final. Niparaja-Pronatura Noroeste.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico. 42 p.
Carter ET, Eads BC, Ravesi MJ, Kingsbury BA.
2015. Exotic invasive plants alter thermal regimes:
implications for management using a case study of a
native ectotherm. Functional Ecology 29: 683-693.
Cox CL, Davis-Rabosky AR, Holmes IA, Reyes-Velasco
J, Roelke CE, Smith EN, Flores-Villela O, McGuire
JA, Campbell JA. 2018. Synopsis and taxonomic
revision of three genera in the snake tribe Sonorini.
Journal of Natural History 52: 945-988.
Cox N, Young BE, Bowles P, Fernandez MF, Marin
J, Rapacciuolo G, Bohm M, Brooks TM, Hedges
SB, Hilton-Taylor C, et al. 2022. A global reptile
assessment highlights shared conservation needs of
tetrapods. Nature 605: 285-290.
Cruz-Elizalde R, Ramirez-Bautista A, Pineda-Lopez
R, Mata-Silva V, DeSantis DL, Garcia-Padilla E,
Johnson JD, Fucsko LA, Wilson LD. 2022. The
herpetofauna of Querétaro, Mexico: composition,
distribution, and conservation status. Amphibian &
Reptile Conservation 16(1) [General Section]: 148-
192 (e308).
Cruz-Saenz D, Mufioz-Nolasco FJ, Mata-Silva_ V,
Johnson JD, Garcia-Padilla E, Wilson LD. 2017.
The herpetofauna of Jalisco, Mexico: composition,
distribution, and conservation status. Mesoamerican
Herpetology 4: 22-118.
Delgadillo J. 2004. E7 Bosque de Coniferas de la Sierra
San Pedro Martir, Baja California, México. Instituto
Nacional de Ecologia, SEMARNAT, México, DF,
Mexico. 159 p.
DOF (Diario Oficial de la Federacion). 2020.
Disponibilidad de agua en Baja California Sur.
Comision Estatal del Agua de Baja California
Sur. Available: — https://cea.bcs.gob.mx/acuiferos/
[Accessed: 5 December 2022].
Frost DR. 2022. Amphibian Species of the World: an
Online Reference. Version 6.0. American Museum
of Natural History, New York, New York, USA.
Available: —_ https://amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org
[ Accessed: 6 December 2022].
Gaeta-Verdin MC. 2020. Efecto de las actividades
de vehiculos fuera de camino en el paisaje de Baja
California. Master’s Thesis. Centro de Investigacion
Cientifica y Educacién Superior de Ensenada,
Ensenada, México. 119 p.
Galina-Tessaro P, Lopez-Acosta D, Alvarez-Cardenas
S, Valdez-Villavicencio JH, Breceda A, Arnaud
GF, Rivera J, Coria BR. 2015. Contribucion a la
Distribucion, Ecologia y Estado de Conservacion de
dos Especies del Género Sceloporus, Endémicas de la
Region del Cabo, Baja California Sur. Informe final
SNIB-CONABIO, proyecto No. HKO012. Centro de
Investigaciones Bioldgicas del Noroeste, México, DF,
Mexico. 113 p.
Garcia RA, Clusella-Trullas S. 2019. Thermal landscape
change as a driver of ectotherm responses to plant
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
invasions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 286:
20191020.
Garcillan PP, Gonzalez-Abraham C, Ezcurra E. 2012.
Phytogeography, vegetation, and ecological regions.
Pp. 23—34 In: Baja California Plant Field Guide. 3"
Edition. Editors, Rebman JP, Roberts NC. San Diego
Natural History Museum, San Diego, California,
USA. 480 p.
Gatica-Colima AB. 1998. Herpetofauna y vegetacion de
un gradiente de perturbacion en las dunas costeras de
San Felipe, Baja California, México. Master’s Thesis.
Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autonoma de Baja
California, Ensenada, BC, México.
Gibbons JF, Scott DE, Ryan TJ, BuhImann KA, Tuberville
TD, Metts BS, Greene JL, Mills T, Leiden Y, Poppy
S, et al. 2000. The global decline of reptiles, déja vu
amphibians. Bioscience 50: 653-666.
Gonzalez-Abraham CE, Garcillan PP, Ezcurra E, Grupo
de Trabajo Ecorregiones. 2010. Ecorregiones de la
peninsula de Baja California: una sintesis. Boletin de
la Sociedad Botanica de México 87: 69-82.
Gonzalez-Sanchez VH, Johnson JD, Garcia-Padilla E,
Mata Silva V, DeSantis DL, Wilson LD. 2017. The
herpetofauna of the Mexican Yucatan Peninsula:
composition, distribution, and conservation.
Mesoamerican Herpetology 4: 263-380.
Gonzalez-Sanchez VH, Johnson JD, Gonzalez-Solis
D, Fucsko LA, Wilson LD. 2021. A review of the
introduced herpetofauna of Mexico and Central
America, with comments on the effects of invasive
species and biosecurity methodology. ZooKeys 1022:
79-154.
Gonzalez-Zamorano P, Nava-Sanchez EH, Leon-
de la Luz JL, Diaz-Castro SC. 2011. Patrones de
distribucion y determinantes ambientales de los
mangles peninsulares. Pp. 67—102 In: Los Mangles de
la Peninsula de Baja California. Editors, Félix-Pico
EF, Serviere-Zaragoza E, Riosmena-Rodriguez R,
Leon-de la Luz JL. CICIMAR, CIBNOR y UABCS,
México, DF, Mexico. 326 p.
Goode MJ, Swann DE, Schwalbe CR. 2004. Effects of
destructive collecting practices on reptiles: a field
experiment. Journal of Wildlife Management 68:
429-434.
Goode MJ, Horrace WC, Sredl MJ, Howland JM.
2005. Habitat destruction by collectors associated
with decreased abundance of rock-dwelling lizards.
Biological Conservation 125: 47-54.
Graciano JC. 2013. Uso del agua y agricultura de
exportacion en Baja California Sur. Perspectivas
desde el agro para el desarrollo regional. Master’s
Thesis. Universidad Autonoma de Baja California
Sur, Ensenada, BC, Mexico. 177 p.
Grismer LL. 1994. The origin and evolution of the
peninsular herpetofauna of Baja California, México.
Herpetological Natural History 2: 51-106.
Grismer LL. 2002. Amphibians and Reptiles of Baja
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
California, including Its Pacific Islands and _ the
Islands in the Sea of Cortés. University of California
Press, Berkeley, California, USA. xii + 399 p.
Grismer LL, McGuire JA. 1993. The oases of central
Baja California, México. Part I. A preliminary account
of the relict mesophilic herpetofauna and the status
of the oases. Bulletin of the Southern California
Academy of Sciences 92: 2—24.
Hastings JR, Turner RM. 1965. Seasonal precipitation
regimes in Baja California, México. Geografiska
Annaler 47A: 204-223.
Haynes E, Pohly A, Clifford DL, Patterson LC,
Manning S, Wack RF, Allender MC. 2021. First
report of ophidiomycosis in a free-ranging California
Kingsnake (Lampropeltis californiae) in California,
USA. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 57: 246-249.
Heimes P. 2016. Snakes of Mexico. Herpetofauna
Mexicana. Volume 1. Edition Chimaira, Frankfurt am
Main, Germany, and ECO Publishing, Rodeo, New
Mexico, USA. 572 p.
Hickey B. 1979. The California current system:
hypotheses and facts. Progress in Oceanography 8:
191-279.
Holland DC. 1994. The Western Pond Turtle: Habitat
and History. Final Report. United States Department
of Energy, Portland, Oregon, USA. 303 p.
Hollingsworth BD, Mahrdt CR, Grismer LL, Banta BD,
Sylber CK. 1997. The occurrence of Sauromalus
varius on a Satellite islet of Isla Salsipuedes, Gulf of
California, México. Herpetological Review 28: 26—
28.
Hollingsworth BD, Mahrdt CR, Grismer LL, Lovich RE.
2015. Herpetofauna of Baja California. Pp. 15-33 In:
Amphibians and Reptiles of the US-Mexico Border
States/Anfibios y reptiles de los estados de la frontera
Meéxico-Estados Unidos. Editor, Lemos-Espinal JA.
Texas A&M University Press, College Station, Texas,
USA. 614 p.
Humphrey RR. 1974. The Boojum and its Home.
University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
214 p.
Jaramillo V. 1994. Revegetacion y Reforestacion de las
Areas Ganaderas en las Zonas Aridas y Semidridas
de México. Secretaria de Agricultura y Recursos
Hidraulicos, Subsecretaria de Ganaderia, Comision
Técnico Consultiva de Coeficientes de Apostadero.
México, DF, Mexico. 48 p.
Jennings MR, Hayes MP. 1994. Amphibian and Reptile
Species of Special Concern in California. California
Department of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries
Division, Rancho Cordova, California, USA. 255 p.
Jofré GM, Reading CJ. 2012. An assessment of the
impact of conservation grazing on reptile populations.
Amphibian and Reptile Conservation Research Report
12/01: 1-48.
Johnson, JD, Mata-Silva V, Garcia-Padilla E, Wilson
LD. 2015 The herpetofauna of Chiapas, Mexico:
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
composition, distribution, and conservation.
Mesoamerican Herpetology 2: 271-329.
Kats LB, Ferrer RP. 2003. Alien predators and amphibian
declines: review of two decades of science and
transition to conservation. Diversity and Distributions
9: 99-110.
Kurczyn JA, Pérez-Brunius P, Lopez M, Candela J,
Delgadillo-Hinojosa F, Garcia-Mendoza E. 2019.
Water masses and ocean currents over the continental
slope off northern Baja California. Journal of
Geophysical Reserch: Oceans 124: 2,803-2,823.
Lambert MR, WHernandez-Gomez O, Krohn AR,
Mutlow A, Patterson LC, Rosenblum EB, Timmer
M, Willis J, Bushell J. 2021. Turtle shell disease
fungus (Emydomyces testavorans). first documented
occurrence in California and prevalence in free-living
turtles. Ichthyology & Herpetology 109: 958-962.
Lara-Reséndiz RA, Galina-Tessaro P, Pérez-Delgadillo
AG, Valdez Villavicencio JH, Méndez-de la Cruz
FR. 2019. Efectos del cambio climatico en una
especie de lagartija termofila de amplia distribucion
(Dipsosaurus dorsalis): un enfoque ecofisioldgico.
Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 90: e902888.
Lara-Reséndiz RA, Galina-Tessaro P, Sinervo B, Miles
DB, Valdez-Villavicencio JH, Valle-Jiménez FI,
Méndez-de la Cruz FR. 2020. How will climate
change impact fossorial lizard species? Two examples
in the Baja California Peninsula. Journal of Thermal
Biology 95: 102811.
Lara-Reséndiz RA, Rosen PC, Sinervo B, Miles DB,
Mendez-de la Cruz FR. 2022. Habitat thermal
quality for Gopherus evgoodei in tropical deciduous
forest and consequences of habitat modification by
buffelgrass. Journal of Thermal Biology 104: 103192.
Lavin MF, Marinone SG. 2003. An overview of the
physical oceanography of the Gulf of California. Pp.
173—204 In: Nonlinear Processes in Geophysical Fluid
Dynamics. Editors, Velasco Fuentes OU, Sheinbaum
J, Ochoa J. Springer, Dordrecht, Germany. 376 p.
Lazcano D, Nevarez-de los Reyes M, Garcia-Padilla
E, Johnson JD, Mata-Silva V, DeSantis DL, Wilson
LD. 2019. The herpetofauna of Coahuila, Mexico:
composition, distribution, and conservation status.
Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 13(2) [General
Section]: 31-94 (e189).
Leaché AD, Koo MS, Spencer CL, Papenfuss TJ, Fisher
RN, McGuire JA. 2009. Quantifying ecological,
morphological, and genetic variation to delimit
species in the Coast Horned Lizard species complex
(Phrynosoma). Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences of the United States of America 106:
12,418-12,423.
Lecléere D, Obersteiner M, Barrett M, Butchart SHM,
Yung L. 2020. Bending the curve of terrestrial
biodiversity needs an integrated strategy. Nature 585:
551-556.
Leyte-Manrique A, Mata-Silva V, Baez-Montes O,
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Fucsko LA, DeSantis DL, Garcia-Padilla E, Rocha
A, Johnson JD, Porras LW, Wilson LD. 2022. The
herpetofauna of Guanajuato, Mexico: composition,
distribution, and conservation status. Amphibian &
Reptile Conservation 16(2) [General Section]: 133-
180 (e321).
Lovich LE, Grismer LL, Danemann G. 2009. Conser-
vation status of the herpetofauna of Baja California,
México and associated islands in the Sea of Cortez
and Pacific Ocean. Herpetological Conservation and
Biology 4: 358-378.
Lowe S, Browne M, Boudjelas S, De Poorter M. 2000.
100 of the World’s Worst Invasive Alien Species.
A Selection from the Global Invasive Species
Database of the Species Specialist Group (ISSG) a
specialist group of the Species Survival Commission
(SSC). World Conservation Union (IUCN), Gland,
Switzerland. 12 p.
Luja VH, Rodriguez-Estrella R, Ratzlaff K, Parra-
Olea G, Ramirez-Bautista A. 2012. The chytrid
fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in isolated
populations of the Baja California Treefrog Pseudacris
hypochondriaca curta in Baja California Sur, Mexico.
Southwestern Naturalist 57: 323-327.
Luja VH, Rodriguez-Estrella R, Rojas-Gonzalez RI.
2016. Reproduccion y abundancia de la rana arboricola
de Baja California Pseudacris hypochondriaca curta
(Anura: Hylidae) en oasis de Baja California Sur.
Pp. 77-100 In: Ecologia y Conservacion de Anfibios
y Reptiles de México. Publicacion Especial No. 4.
Editors, Gutiérrez-Mayen MG, Ramirez-Bautista A,
Pineda E. Sociedad Herpetolégica Mexicana, México,
DF, Mexico. 396 p.
Mahrdt CR, Beaman KR, Valdez-Villavicencio JH,
Papenfuss TJ. 2022. Bipes biporus (Five-toed Worm
Lizard). Catalogue of American Amphibian and
Reptiles 930: 1-39.
Manrriquez-Gomez FJ, Gonzalez-Gutiérrez NS,
Ortiz-Serrato L, Moreno-Higareda HR, Valdez-
Villavicencio JH. 2021. Anfibios y reptiles del Estero
de Punta Banda, Ensenada, Baja California, México.
Revista Latinoamericana de Herpetologia 4: 74-84.
Markham CG. 1972. Baja California’s climate.
Weatherwise 25: 66-101.
Marshall BM, Strine C, Hughes AC. 2020. Thousands of
reptile species threatened by under-regulated global
trade. Nature Communications 11: 4,738.
Mata-Silva V, Johnson JD, Wilson LD, Garcia-Padilla
E. 2015. The herpetofauna of Oaxaca, Mexico:
composition, physiographic distribution, and
conservation. Mesoamerican Herpetology 2: 5—62.
Mata-Silva V, Fucsko LA, Gatira Colima AB, Nevarez-
de los Reyes M, Lazcano D, Valdez Villavicencio J,
Porras LW, DeSantis DL, Rocha A, Johnson JD, et
al. [In press]. Biological connections: the uncertain
future of the threatened U.S.-Mexico border region
herpetofauna. Zootaxa [In Press].
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
Meigs P. 1966. Geography of coastal deserts. Arid Zone
Research 28: 1-140.
Meik JM, Streicher JW, Lawing AM, Flores-Villela O,
Fujita MK. 2015. Limitations of climatic data for
inferring species boundaries: insights from Speckled
Rattlesnakes. PLoS One 10: e0131435.
Meiri S, Bauer AM, Chirio L, Colli GR, Das I, Doan
TM, Feldman A, Castro-Herrera F, Novosolov M,
Pafilis P, et al. 2013. Are lizards feeling the heat? A
tale of ecology and evolution under two temperatures.
Global Ecology and Biogeography 22: 834-845.
Mellink E. 1995. The potential effect of commercialization
of reptiles from Mexico’s Baja California peninsula
and its associated islands. Herpetological Natural
History 3: 95-99.
Mellink E, Contreras J. 2014. Impacts of ranching on
wildlife in Baja California. In: Conservation Science
in Mexico’s Northwest: Ecosystem Status and Trends
in the Gulf of California. Editors, Wehncke EV, Lara-
Lara JR, Alvarez-Borrego S, Ezcurra E. University of
California Institute for Mexico and the United States
(UC MEXUS) and Instituto Nacional de Ecologia y
Cambio Climatico (INECC), México, DF, Mexico.
550 p.
Munguia-Vega A, Rodriguez-Estrella R, Shaw WW,
Culver M. 2013. Localized extinction of an arboreal
desert lizard caused by habitat fragmentation.
Biological Conservation 157: 11-20.
Murray S, Shedd JD, Dugan EA. 2015. Hypsiglena
Slevini. Geographic distribution. Herpetological
Review 46: 62.
Nevarez-de los Reyes M, Lazcano D, Garcia-Padilla E,
Mata-Silva V, Johnson JD, Wilson LD. 2016. The
herpetofauna of Nuevo Leon, Mexico: composition,
distribution, and conservation. Mesoamerican
Herpetology 3: 557-638.
Pampa-Ramirez JT. 2021. Propuesta de manejo para
la conservacion de la culebra real de Todos Santos
(Lampropeltis zonata herrerae) en Ensenada Baja
California, México. Master’s Thesis. Facultad de
Ciencias, Universidad Autonoma de Baja California,
Ensenada, BC, Mexico. 130 p.
Pase CP. 1982. Sierran montane conifer forest. Pp.
49-51 In: Biotic Communities of the American
Southwest: United States and Mexico. Editor, Brown
DE. University of Arizona for the Boyce Thompson
Southwestern Arboretum, Tucson, Arizona, USA. 342
p.
Peinado M, Alcaraz F, Delgadillo J, Aguado I. 1994.
Fitogeografia de la peninsula de Baja California,
México. Anales del Jardin Botdnico de Madrid 51:
255-277.
Peralta-Garcia A, Adams AJ, Briggs CJ, Galina-
Tessaro P, Valdez-Villavicencio JH, Hollingsworth
BD, Shaffer HB, Fisher RN. 2018. Occurrence of
Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in anurans of the
Mediterranean region of Baja California, México.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 127: 193-200.
Peralta-Garcia A, Hollingsworth BD, Richmond JQ,
Valdez-Villavicencio JH, Ruiz-Campos G, Fisher RN,
Cruz-Hernandez P, Galina-Tessaro P. 2016. Status of
the California Red-legged Frog (Rana draytonii) in
the state of Baja California, México. Herpetological
Conservation and Biology 11: 168-180.
Peralta-Garcia A, Samaniego-Herrera A, Valdez-
Villavicencio JH. 2007. Registros nuevos de reptiles
en islas del Noroeste de México. Acta Zooldgica
Mexicana (n.s.) 23: 179-182.
Peralta-Garcia A, Valdez-Villavicencio JH. 2004.
Ensatina eschscholtzii_ eschscholtzii. Geographic
distribution. Herpetological Review 35: 279.
Pereira HM, Leadley PW, Proenca V, Alkemade R,
Scharlemann JPW, Fernandez-Manjyarres JF, Araujo
MB, Balvanera P, Biggs R, Cheung WWL, et al. 2010.
Scenarios for global biodiversity in the 21% century.
Science 330: 1,496—-1,501.
Pianka EP. 1966. Convexity, desert lizards, and spatial
heterogeneity. Ecology 47: 1,055—1,059.
Pliego-Sanchez JV, Blair C, Diaz de la Vega-Pérez AH,
Jiménez-Arcos VH. 2021. The insular herpetofauna
of Mexico: composition, conservation, and
biogeographic patterns. Ecology and Evolution 2021:
1-14.
Ramirez-BautistaA, Hernandez-Salinas U, Cruz-Elizalde
R, Berriozabal-Islas C, Moreno-Lara I, DeSantis DL,
Johnson JD, Garcia-Padilla E, Mata-Silva V, Wilson
LD. 2020. The herpetofauna of Hidalgo, Mexico:
composition, distribution, and conservation status.
Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 14(1) [General
Section]: 63-118 (e224).
Rodriguez-Estrella R, Pérez-Navarro JJ, Granados B,
Rivera L. 2010. The distribution of an invasive plant
in a fragile ecosystem: the Rubber Vine (Cryptostegia
grandiflora) in oases of the Baja California peninsula.
Biological Invasions 12: 3,389-3,393.
Rodriguez-Revelo N, Espejel I, Jiménez-Orocio O,
Martinez ML, Infante-Mata D, Monroy R. 2014a.
Baja California. Pp. 146-156 In: Diagnostico General
de las Dunas Costeras de México. Editors, Martinez
ML, Moreno-Casasola P, Espejel I, Jiménez-Orocio O,
Infante-Mata D, Rodriguez Revelo N, Cruz-Gonzalez
JC. SEMARNAT, México, DF, Mexico. 350 p.
Rodriguez-Revelo N, Espejel I, Jiménez-Orocio O,
Martinez ML, Infante-Mata D, Monroy R. 2014b.
Baja California Sur. Pp. 159-168 In: Diagnostico
General de las Dunas Costeras de México. Editors,
Martinez ML, Moreno-Casasola P, Espejel I, Jiménez-
Orocio O, Infante-Mata D, Rodriguez Revelo N, Cruz-
Gonzalez JC. SEMARNAT, México, DF, Mexico. 350
p.
Romero-Schmidt H, Ortega-Rubio A, Arguelles-Méndez
C, Coria-Benet R, Solis-Marin F. 1994. The effect
of two years of livestock grazing exclosure upon
abundance in a lizard community in Baja California
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Sur, Mexico. Bulletin of the Chicago Herpetological
Society 29: 245-248.
Romero-Schmidt HL, Ortega-Rubio A. 1999. Changes
in lizard abundance on protected versus grazed desert
scrub in Baja California Sur, Mexico. Brazilian
Archives of Biology and Technology 42: 1-6.
Rorabaugh JC, Lemos-Espinal JA. 2016. A Field Guide
to the Amphibians and Reptiles of Sonora, Mexico.
ECO Herpetological Publishing and Distribution,
Rodeo, New Mexico, USA. 688 p.
Rotem G, Ziv Y, Giladi I, Bouskila A. 2013. Wheat
fields as an ecological trap for reptiles in a semiarid
agroecosystem. Biological Conservation 167: 349-—
353:
Santamaria-del-Angel E, Alvarez-Borrego S, Miller-
Karger FE. 1994. Gulf of California biogeographic
regions based on coastal zone color scanner imagery.
Journal of Geophysical Research 99: 7,411-7,414.
Santos-Barrera G, Garcia A, Calzada-Arciniega RA,
Pérez-Cervantes NC, Pacheco-Rodriguez J. 2021.
Herpetofauna at risk of extinction: amphibians and
reptiles in Mexico, critical areas, and conservation
strategies. Pp. 275-288 In: IJmperiled: The
Encyclopedia of Conservation. Editors, DellaSala
DA, Goldstein MI. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
2,608 p.
Schirmel J, Bundschuh M, Entling MH, Kowarik I,
Buchholz S. 2016. Impacts of invasive plants on
resident animals across ecosystems, taxa, and feeding
types: a global assessment. Global Change Biology
22: 594-603.
Schloegel LM, Toledo LF, Longcore JE, Greenspan SE,
Vieira CA, Lee M, Zhao S, Wangen SC, Ferreira CM,
Hipolito M, et al. 2012. Novel, panzootic, and hybrid
genotypes of amphibian chytridiomycosis associated
with the bullfrog trade. Molecular Ecology 21: 5,162—
5,177.
Schlesinger CA, Kaestli M, Christian KA, Muldoon S.
2020. Response of reptiles to weed-control and native
plant restoration in an arid, grass-invaded landscape.
Global Ecology and Conservation 24: e01325.
SEMARNAT (Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos
Naturales). 2003. Evaluacién de la Degradacion
del Suelo Causada por el Hombre en la Republica
Mexicana, Escala 1: 250 000. Memoria Nacional
2001-2002. Semarnat y CP, México, DF, Mexico. 77
p.
SEMARNAT (Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos
Naturales). 2010. Norma Oficial Mexicana nom-059-
semarnat-2010, Proteccion ambiental-Especies nativas
de México de flora y fauna silvestres-Categorias de
riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusion, exclusion
o cambio-Lista de especies en riesgo. Diario
Oficial de la Federacion, 30 de Diciembre de 2010.
SEMARNAT, México, DF, Mexico.
SEMARNAT (Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos
Naturales). 2019. Modificacion del Anexo Normativo
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
III, Lista de especies en riesgo de la Norma Oficial
Mexicana NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010, Proteccion
ambiental-Especies nativas de México de flora y fauna
silvestres-Categorias de riesgo y especificaciones
para su inclusion, exclusi6n o cambio-Lista de
especies en riesgo. Diario Oficial de la Federacion,
14 de Noviembre de 2019. SEMARNAT, México, DF,
Mexico.
Senko J, Koch V, Megill WM, Carthy RR, Templeton RP,
Nichols WJ. 2010. Fine scale daily movements and
habitat use of East Pacific Green Turtles at a shallow
coastal lagoon in Baja California Sur, Mexico.
Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology
391: 92-100.
Shreve F. 1951. Vegetation and flora of the Sonoran
Desert. Volume 1. Vegetation. Carnegie Institute of
Washington Publications 591: 1-192.
Shreve F, Wiggins IR. 1964. Vegetation and Flora of
the Sonoran Desert. 2 Volumes. Stanford University
Press, Stanford, California, USA. 1,752 p.
Sinervo B, Méndez-de la Cruz F, Miles DB, Heulin B,
Bastiaans E, Villagran-Santa Cruz M, Lara-Resendiz
R, Martinez-Méndez N, Calderon-Espinosa MI, Meza-
Lazaro RN, et al. 2010. Erosion of lizard diversity by
climate change and altered thermal niches. Science
328: 894-899.
Skerratt LF, Berger L, Speare R, Cashins S, McDonald
KR, Phillott AD, Hines HB, Kenyon N. 2007. Spread
of chytridiomycosis has caused the rapid global
decline and extinction of frogs. EcoHealth 4: 125—
134.
Smalling KL, Rowe JC, Pearl CA, Iwanowicz LR, Givens
CE, Anderson CW, McCreary B, Adams MJ. 2021.
Monitoring wetland water quality related to livestock
grazing in amphibian habitats. Environmental
Monitoring and Assessment 193: 58.
Sokal RR, Michener CD. 1958. A statistical method for
evaluating systematic relationships. University of
Kansas Science Bulletin 38: 1,409-1,438.
Spencer JE, Pearthree PA. 2001. Headward erosion
versus closed-basin spillover as alternative causes of
Neogene capture of the ancestral Colorado River by
the Gulf of California. Pp. 215—219 In: The Colorado
River: Origin and Evolution: Grand Canyon, Arizona.
Grand Canyon Association Monograph 12. Editors,
Young RA, Spamer EE. Grand Canyon Association,
Grand Canyon, Arizona, USA. 280 p.
Teran-Juarez SA, Garcia-Padilla E, Mata-Silva_ V,
Johnson JD, Wilson LD. 2016. The herpetofauna of
Tamaulipas, Mexico: composition, distribution, and
conservation. Mesoamerican Herpetology 3: 42-113.
Torres-Hernandez LA, Ramirez-Bautista A, Cruz-
Elizalde R, Hernandez-Salinas U, Berriozabal-Islas
C, DeSantis DL, Johnson JD, Rocha A, Garcia-
Padilla E, Mata-Silva V, et al. 2021. The herpetofauna
of Veracruz, Mexico: composition, distribution,
and conservation status. Amphibian & Reptile
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
Conservation 15(2) [General Section]: 72—155 (e285).
Troyo-Diéguez E, Cruz-Falcon A, Norzagaray-Campos
M, Beltran-Morales LF, Murillo-Amador B, Beltran-
Morales FA, Garcia-Hernandez JL, Valdez-Cepeda
RD. 2010. Agotamiento hidro-agricola a partir de la
revolucion verde: axtraccion de agua y gestion de la
tecnologia de riego en Baja California Sur, México.
Estudios Sociales 18: 178-201.
Ureta C, Cuervo-Robayo AP, Calixto-Pérez E. 2018. A
first approach to evaluate the vulnerability of islands’
vertebrates to climate change in Mexico. Atmdsfera
31: 221-254.
Valdez-Villavicencio JH, Peralta-Garcia A, Guillen-
Gonzalez JA. 2016. Nueva poblacion de la tortuga de
poza del suroeste Emys pallida en el Desierto Central
de Baja California, México. Revista Mexicana de
Biodiversidad 87. 264—266.
Valdez-Villavicencio JH, Peralta-Garcia A, Gonzalez-
Gutiérrez NS, Hernandez-Morlan XI, Hinojosa-
Huerta O. 2021. Diversity of the herpetofauna in
restored and disturbed sites in the Colorado River
Delta, Baja California, Mexico. Revista Mexicana de
Biodiversidad 92: e923763.
Valdez-Villavicencio JH, Peralta-Garcia A, Galina-
Tessaro P, Hollingsworth BD, Fisher RN. 2023.
Distribution and conservation of the southwestern
pond turtle Actinemys pallida in Baja California,
México. Pp. 69-79 In: Estudios Sobre la Biologia
y Conservacion de las Tortugas en México. Revista
Latinoamericana de _ Herpetologia, Publicacion
Especial #6. Editors, Macip-Rios R, Flores-Villela
O. Sociedad Herpetologica Mexicana, México, DF,
Mexico. [In Press].
Valentine LE, Roberts B, Schwarzkopf L. 2007.
Mechanisms driving avoidance of non-native plants
by lizards. Journal of Applied Ecology 44: 228-237.
Vanderplank S, Ezcurra E, Delgadillo J, Felger R,
McDade LA. 2014a. Conservation challenges in a
threatened hotspot: agriculture and plant biodiversity
losses in Baja California, Mexico. Biodiversity and
Conservation 23. 2,173—2,182.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
139
Vanderplank S, Wilder BT, Ezcurra E. 2014b.
Uncovering the Dryland Biodiversity of the Cabo
Pulmo Region. Botanical Research Institute of Texas
and Next Generation Sonoran Desert Researchers,
Fort Worth, Texas, USA. 107 p.
Van Devender T. 1990. Late Quaternary vegetation and
climate of the Sonoran Desert, United States, and
Mexico. Pp. 134-165 In: Packrat Middens: The Last
40,000 Years of Biotic Change. Editors, Betancourt
JL, Van Devender TR, Martin PS. University of
Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona, USA. 478 p.
Wake DB. 1991. Declining amphibian populations.
Science 253: 860.
Wiggins IL. 1980. Flora of Baja California. Stanford
University Press, Stanford, California, USA. 1,025 p.
Wilson LD, Mata-Silva V, Johnson JD. 2013a. A
conservation reassessment of the reptiles of Mexico
based on the EVS measure. Contribution to Special
Mexico Issue. Amphibian & Reptile Conservation
7(1): 1-47 (e61).
Wilson LD, Johnson JD, Mata-Silva V. 2013b. A
conservation reassessment of the amphibians of
Mexico based on the EVS measure. Contribution
to Special Mexico Issue. Amphibian & Reptile
Conservation 7(1): 97-127 (e69).
Wilson LD, Johnson JD, Porras LW, Mata-Silva V, Eli
Garcia-Padilla E. 2017. A system for categorizing
the distribution of the Mesoamerican herpetofauna.
Mesoamerican Herpetology 4: 901-913.
Wilson LD, McCranie JR. 2004. The conservation
status of the herpetofauna of Honduras. Amphibian &
Reptile Conservation 3(1): 6-33 (e12).
Woolrich-Pifia GA, Ramirez-Silva JP, Loc-Barragan J,
Ponce Campos P, Mata-Silva V, Johnson JD, Garcia-
Padilla E, Wilson LD. 2016. The herpetofauna of
Nayarit, Mexico: composition, distribution, and
conservation status. Mesoamerican Herpetology 3:
375-448.
Woolrich-Pifia GA, Garcia-Padilla E, DeSantis DL,
Johnson JD, Mata-Silva V, Wilson LD. 2017. The
herpetofauna of Puebla, Mexico: composition,
distribution, and conservation status. Mesoamerican
Herpetology 4: 790-884.
November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Anny Peralta-Garcia is a biologist from Ensenada, Baja California. She earned her Master’s degree
at San Diego State University (California, USA) and her Ph.D. at CIBNOR in Baja California Sur
(Mexico). Her research interests include habitat restoration and the conservation of amphibians and
reptiles in northwestern Mexico. She has authored several research articles, natural history notes,
and two field guides on the Baja California Pacific islands. Anny is a board member of the Mexican
Herpetology Society and is co-founder of Fauna del Noroeste, a non-profit organization that seeks
to promote local biodiversity conservation based on scientific research. Through her organization,
she has helped to recover Baja California populations of the California Red-legged Frog. She has
collaborated on re-introducing this species into southern California, where it had been extirpated for
over 20 years. One of her dreams is to restore freshwater wetlands in Baja California. Anny loves
collaborating with anyone willing to help conserve biodiversity and promote research in under-
represented species.
Jorge H. Valdez-Villavicencio was born in Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico. He obtained his
Bachelor’s degree at the Universidad Autonoma de Baja California (UABC), and his Master’s degree
in the use, management, and conservation of natural resources at the Centro de Investigaciones
Biologicas del Noroeste in La Paz, Baja California Sur. He has collaborated on various projects
related to the monitoring, research, and conservation of wildlife, mainly amphibians and reptiles
in the Baja California peninsula. Jorge is an Associated Curator of the Herpetological Collection
of the UABC, and the San Diego Natural History Museum. An author or co-author of several
scientific papers, Jorge has participated in national and international scientific meetings, symposia,
and workshops, and is a member of the two Mexican herpetological societies. Currently, he is the
Research Coordinator and founding member of Fauna del Noroeste, a non-profit organization that
seeks to promote local biodiversity conservation based on scientific research. His research interest
is focused on the ecology and conservation of amphibians and reptiles.
Lydia Allison Fucsko, who resides in Melbourne, Australia, is an environmental activist and
amphibian conservationist. As a photographer with international publications, she has taken countless
amphibian photographs, including photo galleries of frogs mostly from southeastern Australia. Lydia
has a Bachelor of Humanities from La Trobe University (Bundoora, Victoria, Australia), a Diploma
in Education from the University of Melbourne (Parkville, Victoria, Australia), and postgraduate
diplomas in computer education and in vocational education and training from the University
of Melbourne (Parkville). Additionally, she has a Master’s Degree in Counseling from Monash
University (Clayton, Victoria, Australia). She received her Ph.D. on Environmental Education, which
promoted habitat conservation, species perpetuation, and global sustainable management, from
Swinburne University of Technology (Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia), while being mentored by the
late Australian herpetologist and scholar Dr. Michael James Tyler (Order of Australia recipient). A
sought-after educational consultant, Lydia has academic interests that include: clinical psychology,
focusing on psychopathology; neuroscience and empathy; environmental education for sustainable
development; sentient ecology; academic writing; and creative writing, which includes poetry and
creative non-fiction books for children and young adults. Lydia is also the senior author (with Boria
Sax) of a chapter in the 2019 Springer Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education entitled
“Learning Activities for Environmental Education for Sustainable Development.” Recently, she
co-authored an obituary of Jaime D. Villa; a study of the introduced Mesoamerican herpetofauna;
a treatment of conservation prospects of the Mesoamerican salamander fauna; papers on the
herpetofaunas of Veracruz, Querétaro, and Guanajuato, Mexico; reviews of the books Advances in
Coralsnake Biology, with an Emphasis on South America and Lizards of Mexico. Part 1: Iguanian
Lizards; a study on the biological and cultural diversity of Oaxaca, Mexico; the description of a new
species of snake named Zantilla carolina in honor of her mother Karolina Laszl6; and a survey co-
authored with Michael J. Tyler of calamities affecting museum collections around the world, among
several other academic papers. In 2020, the species 7antilla lydia, with the suggested common name
of Lydia’s little snake, was named in her honor.
140 November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Anny Peralta-Garcia et al.
Bradford Hollingsworth has had a life-long interest in the diversity of amphibians and reptiles. His
research focuses on the systematics and biogeography of amphibians and reptiles of the Southwest,
including the Baja California peninsula and its associated islands. He is responsible for the care
and maintenance of San Diego Natural History Museum’s 78,000 amphibian and reptile research
specimens, as the newly-established Laurence M. Klauber Curator of Herpetology, and launched the
Amphibian and Reptile Atlas of Peninsular California to help make biodiversity information more
accessible to the world. Bradford received his B.S. (1988) and M.S. (1995) degrees from San Diego
State University, and his doctorate (1999) from Loma Linda University (Loma Linda, California,
USA).
Jerry D. Johnson is Professor of Biological Sciences at The University of Texas at El Paso, and
has extensive experience studying the herpetofauna of Mesoamerica, especially that of southern
Mexico. Jerry is the Director of the 40,000-acre “Indio Mountains Research Station,” was a co-
editor on Conservation of Mesoamerican Amphibians and Reptiles and co-author of four of its
chapters. He is also the senior author of the recent paper “A conservation reassessment of the
Central American herpetofauna based on the EVS measure” and is Mesoamerica/Caribbean editor
for Geographic Distribution section of Herpetological Review. Johnson has authored or co-authored
over 130 peer-reviewed papers, including two notable articles in 2010, “Geographic distribution
and conservation of the herpetofauna of southeastern Mexico” and “Distributional patterns of the
herpetofauna of Mesoamerica, a Biodiversity Hotspot.” One species, 7Zantilla johnsoni, has been
named in his honor. Presently, he is an Associate Editor and Co-chair of the Taxonomic Board for
the journal Mesoamerican Herpetology.
Vicente Mata-Silva is a herpetologist originally from Rio Grande, Oaxaca, Mexico. His interests
include the ecology, conservation, behavior, systematics, natural history, and biogeography of the
herpetofaunas of Mexico, Central America, and the southwestern United States. He received his
B.S. degree from the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México (UNAM), and his M.S. and
Ph.D. degrees from the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP). Vicente is an Assistant Professor
of Biological Sciences at UTEP in the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Program, and Assistant
Director of UTEP’s 41,200-acre Indio Mountains Research Station, located in the Chihuahuan
Desert of Trans-Pecos, Texas. To date, Vicente has authored or co-authored over 100 peer-reviewed
scientific publications. He also is a Taxonomic Board Member of the website Mesoamerican
Herpetology and Associate Editor for the journal Herpetological Review.
Arturo Rocha is a Ph.D. student in the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology program at the
University of Texas at El Paso. His interests include the study of the biogeography, physiology, and
ecology of amphibians and reptiles in the southwestern United States and Mexico. A graduate of
the University of Texas at El Paso, his thesis centered on the spatial ecology of the Trans-Pecos Rat
Snake (Bogertophis subocularis) in the northern Chihuahuan Desert. To date, he has authored or
co-authored over 20 peer-reviewed scientific publications.
Dominic L. DeSantis is an Assistant Professor of Biology at Georgia College & State University,
Milledgeville, Georgia, USA, in the Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences.
Dominic’s research interests broadly include the behavioral ecology, conservation biology, and
natural history of herpetofauna. In addition to ongoing collaborative projects associated with the
Mesoamerican Research Group, much of Dominic’s current research focuses on using animal-borne
sensor technologies to study the behavioral ecology of snakes in the field. While completing his
Ph.D. at the University of Texas at El Paso, Dominic accompanied Vicente Mata-Silva, Eli Garcia-
Padilla, and Larry David Wilson on survey and collecting expeditions to Oaxaca in 2015, 2016,
and 2017, and is a co-author on numerous natural history publications produced from those visits,
including an invited book chapter on the conservation outlook for herpetofauna in the Sierra Madre
del Sur of Oaxaca.
141 November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
The herpetofauna of the Baja California Peninsula
Louis W. Porras graduated with a degree in Biology in 1971 from what is known today as Miami-
Dade College (Miami, Florida, USA). Over his career, Louis has authored or co-authored over
60 academic publications, including the descriptions of two new species, and two taxa have been
named in his honor. Louis developed an interest in herpetology at an early age in his native Costa
Rica. His passion for the field led him to travel to many remote areas, including throughout the
Bahamas, the United States, Mesoamerica, and parts of South America. In 1968, he worked at the
Houston Zoological Gardens, and from 1982 to 1984 at Utah’s Hogle Zoo. In 1976, he attended
the inaugural meeting of the International Herpetological Symposium (IHS), and later served the
group as Vice-President and President. In 1993, along with Gordon W. Schuett, he helped launch
the journal Herpetological Natural History, and for the IHS’ 20" anniversary, in recognition of
his contributions, three former Presidents dedicated the book Advances in Herpetoculture in his
honor. Louis’ career in publishing began in 1995, when as a member of Canyonlands Publishing
Group, he helped publish Fauna magazine and the book Pythons of Australia. In 2002, he founded
Eagle Mountain Publishing, LC, which has published such herpetological titles as Biology of the
Vipers (2002), Biology of the Boas and Pythons (2007), Amphibians, Reptiles, and Turtles in Kansas
(2010), Conservation of Mesoamerican Amphibians and Reptiles (2010), and Amphibians and
Reptiles of San Luis Potosi (2013). From 2014 to 2018, he was the Publisher and Managing Editor
of the journal Mesoamerican Herpetology, and more recently he was the Publisher and Co-editor of
the book Advances in Coralsnake Biology: with an Emphasis on South America.
Larry David Wilson is a herpetologist with extensive experience in Mesoamerica (1966 to the
present). He was born in Taylorville, Illinois, United States, and received his university education
at the University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana (B.S. degree, 1962) and at Louisiana State
University in Baton Rouge (M.S. and Ph.D. degrees, 1965 and 1968, respectively). He has authored
or co-authored 482 peer-reviewed papers and books on herpetology. Larry is the senior editor of
Conservation of Mesoamerican Amphibians and Reptiles (2010) and the co-author of seven of its
chapters. His other books, all co-authored, include The Snakes of Honduras (two editions, 1982 and
1985), Middle American Herpetology (1988), The Amphibians of Honduras (2002), Amphibians &
Reptiles of the Bay Islands and Cayos Cochinos, Honduras (2005), The Amphibians and Reptiles of
the Honduran Mosquitia (2006), and Guide to the Amphibians & Reptiles of Cusuco National Park,
Honduras (2008). He is also the co-author of 15 published entries in the Mexican Conservation
Series dealing with the herpetofauna of the states of Michoacan, Oaxaca, Chiapas, Tamaulipas,
Nayarit, Nuevo Leon, Jalisco, Puebla, Coahuila, Hidalgo, Veracruz, Querétaro, Tabasco, and
Guanajuato, as well as the tri-state Mexican Yucatan Peninsula. In addition, Larry is a co-author of
several significant publications on the development and extensive application of the EVS measure
and on conservation issues related to the Mexican herpetofauna at the national level. To date, he
has authored or co-authored the descriptions of 76 currently-recognized herpetofaunal species, and
Six species have been named in his honor, including the anuran Craugastor lauraster, the lizard
Norops wilsoni, and the snakes Oxybelis wilsoni, Myriopholis wilsoni, and Cerrophidion wilsoni, as
well as the coccidian parasite /sospora wilsoni. In 2005, he was designated a Distinguished Scholar
in the Field of Herpetology at the Kendall Campus of Miami-Dade College by the then-campus
president, Dr. Wasim Shomar. Currently, Larry is a Co-chair of the Taxonomic Board for the website
Mesoamerican Herpetology.
142 November 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e326
Official journal website:
amphibian-reptile-conservation.org
Amphibian & Reptile Conservation
17(1 & 2) [General Section]: 143-160 (e327).
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:737F8861-364F-48EC-8DCD-BBDCAD3573C4
A new species of salamander (Caudata: Plethodontidae:
Bolitoglossa) from the subalpine rain paramo of the
Cordillera de Talamanca, Costa Rica
12,3.*E rick Arias, ?Gerardo Chaves, and ‘Gabriela Parra-Olea
‘Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, UNAM, AP 70-153 Ciudad Universitaria, CP 04510, México, D.F, MEXICO *Escuela de
Biologia, Universidad de Costa Rica, San Pedro, 11501-2060 San José, COSTA RICA 3Centro de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Ecologia
Tropical (Museo de Zoologia), Universidad de Costa Rica, San Pedro, 11501-2060 San José, COSTA RICA
Abstract.—The subalpine rain paramo of Isthmian Central America is an area with a high level of endemism.
The salamanders of the Bolitoglossa subpalmata Species Group are restricted to the highlands of Costa
Rica and Panama, including the subalpine rain paramo. During explorations of the paramos in the Cordillera
de Talamanca, we found populations of Bolitoglossa that were referred to B. subpalmata S.G. These new
populations were compared phylogenetically with all species within the species group using the 16S and cyt b
mitochondrial genes; and they were also compared morphometrically with B. kamuk and B. pesrubra. Herein
we described a new species of the B. subpalmata Species Group, which inhabits the subalpine rain paramo and
montane forest surrounding the paramo in the Southeastern region in Costa Rica. This new species highlights
the role of the subalpine rain paramo in the speciation of salamanders in the highlands of Isthmian Central
America, as well as the need to protect this unique and vulnerable habitat.
Keywords. Amphibia, caudate, Central America, paramo, phylogenetics, Plethodontidae
Resumen.—El paramo subalpino de América Central istmica es alto en endemismos. Las salamandras del
grupo de especies Bolitoglossa subpalmata estan restringidas a las tierras altas de Costa Rica y Panama,
incluyendo el paramo subalpino. Durante exploraciones a los paramos en la Cordillera de Talamanca
encontramos varias poblaciones de Bolitoglossa que fueron asignadas al grupo de especies B. subpalmata.
Estas nuevas poblaciones fueron comparadas filogenéticamente con todas las especies dentro del grupo de
especies de B. subpalmata; ademas fueron comparadas morfometricamente contra B. kamuk y B. pesrubra.
Aqui se describe una nueva especie del grupo de especies B. subpalmata, habitante del paramo subalpino y
del bosque montano cerca del paramo en la region sureste de Costa Rica. Esta nueva especie resalta el rol
del paramo subalpino en la especiacién de las salamandras de las tierras altas de América Central istmica y la
necesidad de proteger este habitat unico y vulnerable.
Palabras clave. América Central, Amphibia, Caudados, filogenética, Paramo, Pletodontidae
Citation: Arias E, Chaves G, Parra-Olea G. 2023. A new species of salamander (Caudata: Plethodontidae: Bolitoglossa) from the subalpine rain
paramo of the Cordillera de Talamanca, Costa Rica. Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 17(1 & 2): 143-160 (e327).
Copyright: © 2023 Arias et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License [Attribution
4.0 International (CC BY 4.0): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/], which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original author and source are credited. The official and authorized publication credit sources, which will be duly enforced, are
as follows: official journal title Amphibian & Reptile Conservation; official journal website: amphibian-reptile-conservation.org.
Accepted: 5 November 2023; Published: 24 December 2023
Introduction
The subalpine rain paramo from Isthmian Central
America (ICA) is an extremely reduced ecosystem that
is fragmented and vulnerable. In ICA, the subalpine rain
paramo is isolated in the highlands, especially in the
Cordillera de Talamanca’s summits, and covers less than
150 km? (Kappelle and Horn 2016). The paramo inICAcan
Correspondence. “eapiedra@gmail.com
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
be considered a “sky island” located in the northwestern
part of the Neotropical paramo, separated by straight-line
distances of 1,100 km to Colombia’s Paramo and 1,000
km to the highlands of Nuclear Central America. The
subalpine paramo of ICA is characterized by low species
diversity but a high level of endemism, especially among
plants, although several vertebrate species are exclusive
to the paramo (Kappelle and Horn 2016). Even though
December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e327
A new species of Bolitoglossa
Pacific
Ocean
-86 -85
B. splendida
B. bramet
B. gomezi
B. gracilis
B. subpalmata
B. tica
B. kamuk
B. pesrubra
B. bolanosi sp. nov.
(>) 2000-3000
|_| >3000
Boenmeee @ *
50 kilometers
Sea
Caribbean
$4 “83 “82
Fig. 1. (A) Map showing the known populations of the species within the Bolitoglossa subpalmata species group. (B) Map showing
the localities for B. bolanosi sp. nov. and the species close to it in the paramo of the Cordillera de Talamanca. The open shapes
indicate the historical data and the solid shapes indicate the localities with molecular data included herein.
the subalpine rain paramo of ICA is relatively small in
area, several regions remain unexplored and several
species may possibly remain unnamed. To the best of
our knowledge, only three species of salamanders are
exclusively found in the ICA’s paramo: Bolitoglossa
kamuk, B. pesrubra, and B. pygmaea.
Most salamanders of the ICA are associated with the
highlands, especially on the Cordillera de Talamanca,
where studies have documented high species turnover
between sites and along elevational gradients (Garcia-
Paris et al. 2000; Wake 1987). The Bolitoglossa
subpalmata Species Group (Parra-Olea et al. 2004) is
an example of this pattern, containing eight species (B.
bramei, B. gomezi, B. gracilis, B. kamuk, B. pesrubra, B.
splendida, B. subpalmata, and B. tica) that are distributed
in the highlands of Costa Rica and western Panama
(Fig. 1), with high species turnover along latitudinal
and elevational gradients (AmphibiaWeb 2023; Boza-
Oviedo et al. 2012; Garcia-Paris et al. 2008). Although
the phylogenetic relationships of the Bolitoglossa
subpalmata S.G. have been relatively well-studied
(Boza-Oviedo et al. 2012), there is still little information
on the distribution ranges of the species in this group,
especially B. pesrubra, and the area between the paramo
of the Cerro Chirrip6 and the paramo of the Cerro Kamuk
has not been sampled at all.
During fieldwork in the subalpine rain paramo in the
Cordillera de Talamanca, specifically the summits of the
peaks Durika, Arbolado, Haku, and Utyum (Fig. 1), we
found some specimens of the B. subpalmata S.G., filling
in the distribution range for the group. Based on the
molecular and morphological data reported herein, we
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
describe these samples as a new species of Bolitoglossa
closely related to B. kamuk and B. pesrubra of the B.
subpalmata S.G.
Materials and Methods
Taxon sampling. In July 2013, March 2015, January
2016, and October 2016, we carried out collecting trips to
Cerro Utyum (July 2013 and March 2015), Cerro Durika
(January 2016), Cerro Arbolado (October 2016), and
Cerro Haku (October 2016) on the Talamanca Mountain
range within La Amistad International Park, Costa Rica
(Fig. 1). These trips involved walking a transect from
Olan, Buenos Aires (9.2788° N, 83.2156° W, 1,500 m
asl; all GPS coordinates in WGS84 datum) on the Pacific
slope to the summits of the peaks. The salamanders
were found by opening bromeliads from previously
cut-off trees, and a total of 19 specimens referred to
Bolitoglossa subpalmata S.G. were found in the sampled
peak summits.
All the specimens collected for this study were
humanely euthanized using a _ topical anesthetic.
Following the euthanization process, a small tissue
sample, either liver or the tip of the tail, was taken and
stored in 96% ethanol. The specimens were fixed in a
10% formalin solution and transferred to 70% ethanol
for long-term preservation. Individuals were deposited
in the herpetological collection of Museo de Zoologia
at Universidad de Costa Rica (UCR) (Appendix 1).
Museum collection acronyms follow Frost (2023),
with the additions of EAP (Erick Arias field numbers),
CRARC (Costa Rica Amphibian Research Center private
December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e327
Arias et al.
collection), and NV= No voucher.
Amplification and sequencing. Total genomic DNA
was extracted from the ethanol-preserved tissues of 24
Bolitoglossa specimens using the phenol-chloroform
standard protocol (Sambrook and Russell 2006). The
large subunit ribosomal RNA (16S) and cytochrome b
(cyt 6) mitochondrial genes were amplified. The primers
16Sar and 16Sbr (Palumbi et al. 1991) were used for 16S,
and primers MVZ15 and MVZ16 (Moritz et al. 1992)
were used for cyt b. PCR amplifications were performed
using a total volume of 15 uL, which contained 1 uL
DNA template (at 50 ng uL"'), 0.75 U Taq polymerase
(Amplificasa®, Biotecnologias Moleculares), 1X PCR
buffer with 1.5 mM MgCl, 0.2 mM deoxynucleotide
triphosphates (dNTPs), and 0.3 uM forward and reverse
primers. The PCR conditions were as follows: for 16S,
an initial cycle of 5 min at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles
of 45 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 55 °C, 45 s at 72 °C, plus a
final step of 3 min at 72 °C; and for cyt 5, an initial
cycle of 2 min at 94 °C, followed by 38 cycles of 30 s
at 94 °C, 1 min at 48 °C, 1 min at 72 °C, plus a final
step of 8 min at 72 °C. The PCR products were cleaned
with ExoSap-IT (USB Corporation) and sequenced in
both directions using the original amplification primers
and BigDye termination reaction chemistry (Applied
Biosystems). The cycle-sequencing products were
column-purified with Sephadex G-50 (GE Healthcare)
and run on an ABI 3500xL Genetic Analyzer (Applied
Biosystems). Consensus sequences for each individual
were constructed using SEQUENCHER 5.3 (Genes
Codes Corp.). The resulting sequences were deposited in
GenBank (Appendix 1).
Phylogenetic analyses. The sequences obtained here
were compared with the sequences of the 16S and cyt b
mitochondrial genes for 78 specimens of the Bolitoglossa
subpalmata species group. Sequences of B. aurae were
used as outgroup and those from B. compacta were used
to root all trees based on the results in Rovito et al. (2015).
The list of vouchers and GenBank accession numbers
used in this study are provided in Appendix 1. Sequence
alignments were performed using the MUSCLE 3.7
software (Edgar 2004) with default parameters and
trimmed to the point where most of the taxa had sequence
data. PartitionFinder v2.1.1 software (Lanfear et al.
2017) and the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC)
were used to select the best partition scheme and the
best model of sequence evolution for each partition. A
single set of branchlengths was used across all partitions
(branchlengths=linked), and the search for the best
partition scheme used a heuristic search (scheme=greedy,
Lanfear et al. 2012). Four subsets were defined a priori:
one for 16S and three for cyt b (partitioned by codon
position).
Phylogenetic analyses were performed using both
Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference
(BI) methods. The maximum likelihood analysis was
performed using Garli 2.01 (Zwickl 2006). To find
the best tree, ten search replicates were run with the
following default setting values: streefname = random,
attachmentsper-taxon = 24, genthreshfortopoterm =
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
100,000, and significanttopochange = 0.00001. For
bootstrapping, 1,000 pseudoreplicates were run with
the previous settings and with the following changes:
genthreshfortopoterm = 10,000, significanttopochange
=0.01, and treerejectionthreshold = 20, as suggested in
the Garli manual to speed up the bootstrapping. From
these bootstraps, a majority rule consensus tree was
obtained using Sumtrees (Sukumaran and Holder 2010a)
from DendroPy package version 4.4.0 (Sukumaran and
Holder 2010b). Bayesian phylogenetic analysis was
performed using MrBayes 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2012)
with the partition scheme and the model of sequence
evolution for each partition as selected previously. Two
separate analyses were run, each consisting of 50 million
generations, sampled every 1,000 generations, and four
chains with default heating parameters. A time-series plot
of the likelihood scores of the cold chain was examined
to check stationarity using Tracer 1.6 software (Rambaut
et al. 2014). The first 25% of trees were discarded as
burn-in and the remaining trees were used to estimate
the allcompat consensus tree along with the posterior
probabilities for each node and each parameter. The Garli
and MrBayes analyses were run on the CIPRES portal
(Miller et al. 2010). Genetic distances (uncorrected
p-distances) were computed using MEGA6 (Tamura et
al. 2013).
Morphometrics. The measurements used herein follow
those proposed by Kubicki et al. (2022). The specimens
from new localities were compared morphometrically
only with the species B. kamuk and B. pesrubra, given
that these are the species of the group that inhabit the
subalpine paramo and occur geographically close
(Fig. 1, Appendix 2). The following 29 morphological
measurements were taken on each of the 31 adult
specimens of Bolitoglossa subpalmata S.G. that were
examined in this study: standard length (SL), shoulder
width (ShW), head width (HeW), neck width (NeW),
eye width (EW), snout length (SnL), jaw to snout length
(JSL), lateral gular fold to tip of snout (LGES), internarial
distance (IND), naris to lip distance (NLP), intercanthal
distance (ICD), hind limb length (HLL), front limb length
(FLL), trunk width (TW), midventral gular fold to snout
length (VGS), front limb to snout distance (FSL), ulna
and hand length (UHL), axilla to groin length (AGL),
vent length (VL), hand width (HaW), hand length (HaL),
length of Finger III (LF3), width of Finger III (WF3),
length of Finger II (LF2), foot width (FoW), foot length
(FoL), length of Toe III (LT3), width of Toe III (WT3),
and length of Toe II (LT2). The additional proportions
reported here include: IND/HeW, HeW/AGL, SnL/HeW,
HaL/VGS, FoL/VGS, HaW/HeW, FoW/HeW, LT2/FoL,
LF2/HaL, WT3/FoW, WF3/HaW, HaL/HaW, and FoL/
Fow.
The measurements were taken with a Mitutoyo
Absolute 4084 digital caliper, and rounded to the nearest
0.1 mm. Given that there are very significant overlaps in
the numbers of teeth found in the different Bolitoglossa
species known to occur in Costa Rica (Boza-Oviedo et al.
2012; Garcia-Paris et al. 2008; Savage 2002), the number
of teeth in the specimens examined in this study were not
counted. We believe that attempting to accurately count
December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e327
A new species of Bolitoglossa
the number of teeth in such small specimens (most of
which were fixed with their mouths in a closed position),
requires a high-level of invasive manipulation that would
most likely cause significant and unnecessary damage
to the mouth cavity. The limb interval is equal to the
number of costal folds between the tips of the longest
digits of the adpressed front and hind limbs, expressed 1n
0.5 increments (e.g., 4 or 4.5).
Morphometric statistics. To avoid allometric effects
relative to the differences in the sizes and shapes
between species and between individuals, the data
were transformed using the method of Lleonart et al.
(2000). In this method, a logarithmic transformation
of the continuous variables is performed to reduce the
extreme values. All transformed variables were used in
the allometric transformation by means of the equation:
=n
where Y* corresponds to the value of each of the dependent
variables corrected for size and shape, Y corresponds to
the value of each dependent morphometric variable, X, is
the average of the SL variable for all populations, X, is the
SL value for each individual, and 6 is the regression line
intercept with the Y-axis resulting from the regression of
each dependent variable with X,. The intercept is used
as an allometric transformation factor and is unique for
each variable.
A discriminant analysis was performed to determine
whether the morphometric variables were effective in
predicting the species. Only those variables that were
different among at least two of the three putative species
analyzed were included in the discriminant analysis. The
following variables were finally used in the discriminant
analysis: HeW, JSL, ICD, HLL, VGS, HaW, HaL, HaL/
VGS, FoL/VGS, and HaW/HeW. The discriminant
analyses were separated by sex, and were performed
using R v3.3.3 (R Development Core Team 2013).
Results
Molecular analyses. The mitochondrial dataset includes
samples of all described species in the Bolitoglossa
subpalmata S.G. The resulting data matrix had a total
of 80 sequences (31 salamanders collected in this study
and 49 sequences downloaded from Genbank) with a
sequence length of 1,334 bp, including gaps, with 527 bp
for 16S and 807 for cyt b. Three partitions were identified
with the following substitution models: HK Y+I+G for
16S + cyt 6 codon position 3, HK Y+I for codon position
1 of cyt b, and TRN+G for cyt 6 codon position 2.
The phylogenies from Garli and MrBayes were
relatively discordant in the internal topology within
the B. subpalmata S.G. (Fig. 2). However, all
phylogenetic analyses found the B. subpalmata S.G.to be
monophyletic, with three internal clades relatively well-
supported. The first clade was formed by B. bramei and
B. gomezi, two species that are restricted to premontane
and montane forests of the Pacific slope. The second
clade was formed by B. gracilis sister to B. tica + B.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
subpalmata, and these species are distributed in the
Volcanic Central Mountain range and the northern part
of the Cordillera de Talamanca. Finally, a well-supported
clade was formed by B. kamuk sister to B. pesrubra +
unnamed taxon, and these three species are restricted to
the subalpine rain paramo of the Cordillera de Talamanca.
The phylogenetic position of B. splendida is uncertain. In
the Bayesian analysis, this species was weakly supported
as sister to the clade formed by the three species of the
paramo. In the ML analysis, B. splendida was weakly
supported as sister to the clade formed by B. bramei + B.
gomezi, forming the sister clade to the clade formed by B.
gracilis, B. subpalmata, and B. tica.
The mitochondrial genetic distances are shown in
Table 1. Genetic distances between the specimens of the
unnamed taxon from the subalpine rain paramo and all
other members of the B. subpalmata species group are
1.45—-4.71% for 16S and 5.03—9.09% for cyt b.
Morphometric analyses. The specimens examined
included 13 specimens (8Q and 54) of the unnamed
taxon from the subalpine rain paramo, 15 specimens of B.
pesrubra (7@. and 8), and three specimens of B. kamuk
(18 and 23). The morphometric variation between the
three species that inhabit the subalpine rain paramo of
Costa Rica is shown in Table 2. The discriminant analysis
correctly classified 100% of the specimens to the species
(Fig. 3) in both sexes, showing a clear separation between
the specimens of the new species described below and
the specimens of B. kamuk and B. pesrubra. The ratios
HaL/VGS, HaW/HeW, and IND/HeW differed among
the three species of the subalpine rain paramo.
Description of New Species
Bolitoglossa bolanosi sp. nov.
Bolafios’ Web-footed Salamander
(Figs. 4-6)
urn:Isid:zoobank.org:act:3 F7EO0D7E-906F-4FCD-B4CE-0A48F134DEA1
Holotype. UCR 22965, an adult male from Costa Rica:
Provincia de Puntarenas: Canton de Buenos Aires:
Distrito de Buenos Aires: the summit of Cerro Arbolado,
Parque Internacional La Amistad, (9.320°, -83.216°;
2,600 m asl), collected by Erick Arias and Omar Zufiga
on 19 October 2016.
Paratopotype. UCR 22964, a subadult male, same data
as holotype.
Paratypes. UCR 22424, an adult male; UCR 22423,
an adult female; UCR 22425, a subadult female; UCR
22422 and UCR 22426, subadult males; and UCR 22427,
a juvenile from Costa Rica: Provincia de Puntarenas:
Canton de Buenos Aires: Distrito de Buenos Aires: the
summit of Cerro Utyum, Parque Internacional LaAmistad,
(9.323°, -83.187°; 2,870 m asl), collected by Erick Arias,
Gerardo Chaves, Olmer Cordero, and Omar Zufiga
on 30 March 2015. UCR 22421, an adult female from
Costa Rica: Provincia de Limon: Canton de Talamanca:
Distrito de Telire: the summit of Cerro Utyum, Parque
December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e327
0.02
Arias et al.
B. compacta UCR20532
B. aurae UCR22842
51
63
31
a3
96
2
N
N
N
nn
ore
No
Uo
om)
Fee ior
= BODO
AupApPHHp
OOBAWNCO_}
MVZ229170
UC
R20 iB. gracilis
5
28
ae
NN
COE,
a
@
S
5
Nd
5
se
NS
INS
hd
RN aS
e)
G
wl)
OPES
—
Q
\O
B. bolanosi sp. nov.
C
55
eS
el
SSN
i)
cc
le
Ss
MAWIYeRN
c
wey
G
Lvs)
Com}
me
(oe)
DB
UCR20251
NV-Cerro de la Muerte |B. pesrubra
MVZ190928
MVZ225881
MVZ195598
Fig. 2. Bayesian phylogenetic inference shows the relationships of the Bolitoglossa subpalmata species group based on the 16S
and cyt b mitochondrial DNA gene fragments. Bootstrap proportions from maximum likelihood are shown above the branches, and
numbers below the branches are posterior probabilities (multiplied by 100) from the MrBayes analysis. The scale bar refers to the
estimated substitutions per site. The support values of any node within the species are not shown. The asterisks represent support
>99. NV = no voucher.
Internacional La Amistad, (9.333°, -83.180°; 2,913 m
asl), collected by Erick Arias, Gerardo Chaves, Olmer
Cordero, and Omar Zufiiga on 30 March 2015. UCR
22745, an adult male; UCR 22741—4, adult females; and
UCR 22746, a juvenile from Costa Rica: Provincia de
Puntarenas: Canton de Buenos Aires: Distrito de Buenos
Aires: the summit of Cerro Haku, Parque Internacional
La Amistad, (9.322°, -83.203°; 2,660 m asl), collected
by Erick Arias and Omar Zufiiga on 28 December 2015.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
147
UCR 24245, an adult female; UCR 24246, an adult
male; UCR 24247, a subadult male; and UCR 24248,
a juvenile from Costa Rica: Provincia de Puntarenas:
Canton de Buenos Aires: Distrito de Buenos Aires:
the summit of Cerro Durika, Parque Internacional La
Amistad, (9.374°, -83.303°; 3,240 m asl), collected by
Omar Zufiiga on 13 January 2016.
Generic Placement. Assigned to the genus Bolitoglossa
December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e327
A new species of Bolitoglossa
due to having 14 costal grooves and lacking a sublingual
Z fold, and to the subgenus Eladinea based on the molecular
a evidence presented herein.
g|e| 4 2 8 RBs SS auch: sab |
Boy [Boel eats ceieel cg Peete kein ss whet iagnosis. The combination of the following
os {8 characteristics can be used to distinguish Bolitoglossa
3 aS bolanosi from the other described species of the genus
2Is Bolitoglossa: (1) having broad hands and feet, with the
iS distal phalanges on the fingers and toes free of palmar
€ i and plantar tissue; (2) dorsal coloration highly variable,
e 3S rarely black brownish uniform and usually mottled
Fe a (Wee Gretel boa tec ne | S with yellow spots, but never with red on hind limbs or
Sa |beilso eee fee Pee ee te af forelimbs; and (3) 16S and cyt b mtDNA distances.
oO 1s
zg Comparisons. Bolitoglossa bolanosi is differentiated
=) from members of the subgenus Eladinea by its 16S and
eripe cyt b mtDNA distances. Since B. bolanosi is only known
nD Filia & & S&S & a | 5 & to occur in Costa Rica and molecular evidence strongly
ia i Oe rae ue oe te mo supports it forming part of the Bolitoglossa subpalmata
s species group within the subgenus Eladinea, phenotypic
2 comparisons are presented here only concerning the
S : members of that clade (B. bramei, B. gomezi, B. gracilis,
Sot] tei Ore On eel at | ca Save Se B. kamutk, B. pesrubra, B. splendida, B. subpalmata, and
c ax | a ~ mn a ~ Km wo B. tica), which are endemic to mountain ranges of Costa
% Rica and western Panama.
8 Contrasting characteristics for Bolitoglossa bolanosi
Zz x are presented in parentheses. Bolitoglossa bramei Wake
S/8 et al., 2007 can be distinguished from B. bolanosi
= = ao 2 ay 0 0 © & by having a rounded snout in males (snout strongly
S tO: SS + STF HM HH :
SLT sSl a a am A | Co KN 8 truncated in males); dorsal ground color dark brown to
S| 5 brownish red, usually with darker mottling or frosting of
3 |% silvery-gray (dorsal ground color black to dark brown,
= usually with mottling or blotches of yellow to red).
Sle Bolitoglossa gomezi Wake et al., 2007 has fore limbs
aS |e | ct -& <eo OT eke emis ee relatively shorter, FLL/SL 20% (FLL/SL 22.3—-26.1%),
|S iste eG = A &~ OM OS ; ;
sa rel eee, ee | eT se eS eS snout rounded (snout truncate in males). Bolitoglossa
& | gracilis Bolafios et al., 1987 has dorsum yellowish
2 ground color and a distinct dark midventral stripe
8 n (dorsum variable but never with yellowish ground color
2 S/S & | S & SERA and never with a distinct midventral stripe). Bolitoglossa
Baliee es <2 Cr aer toe tae oeumt splendida Boza-Oviedo et al., 2012 has a shiny black
= 7 dorsum with a bright reddish-orange broad dorsal band
ra extending from the back of the head to the base of the
op g tail, and with bright enamel-yellow spots scattered along
B/S] 3% | QR om SHR RH GT the lateral and ventrolateral surfaces (dorsum variable
= Weel a ia ee i i ae ir but none with a reddish dorsal band extending from the
a head to the tail). Bolitoglossa subpalmata (Boulenger,
* 1896) has forelimbs that are relatively shorter, FLL/SL
3 x 18.7-23.1% (FLL/SL 22.3-26.1%). Bolitoglossa tica
8 BS Garcia-Paris et al., 2008 has dorsal ground color usually
3 |§ | Soe ee SS TON BT SD a uniform reddish brown with a darker tail, rarely with
5 | 8 Se nO Os Gh BE ah en"cy mottling or blotches contrasting (dorsal ground color
a a black to dark brown, usually with yellow to red mottling
3 or blotchy contrasting); prominent whitish spots on the
3 venter (venter without whitish spots).
E 2 Bolitoglossa bolanosi differs from its closest relatives
2 = as follows: Bolitoglossa kamuk Boza-Oviedo et al., 2012
= . S 5 is smaller and more slender with mean SL 34.6—38.4 mm
2 = sna & x g g (larger and robust, SL = 39.43-50.01 mm); internarial
2 § § =: 8 & Sze S 8 distance relatively shorter, IND/HeW = 0.26+0.05
2 Sere. That eye St aS oe RS (internarial distance relatively longer, IND/HeW =
G se ee ee ye ee 0.31+0.05); shorter tail TL/SL 98-99% (tail long, TL/SL
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 148 December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e327
Arias et al.
Table 2. Morphometric data for Bolitoglossa bolanosi sp. nov., B. kamuk, and B. pesrubra. These data were obtained prior to
morphometric correction.
Mean+S.D. (Range) Mean+S.D. (Range) Mean+S.D. (Range)
ee Ee Ee 3 (N=2) 3 (N=8)
43.05+5.54 41.83+6.55 35.2+0.85 50.643 48.3443.61
(32.71-50.01) | (34.01-49.04)
(34.6-35.8) (47.6—54.3) (47.6-54.78)
& 5.64+0.98 5, 3441.02
(4.25-7.49) (4.4-7.09)
W
6.7440.7 6.4340.72
Bie | ee
5.62+0.84 5.1740.74
(3.99-6.72) (4.26-6.17)
a 2.32+0.28 2.5+0.48
(1.78-2.59) (2.01-3.18)
Ls 2.75+0.32 2. 8840.43
(2.26-3.09) (2.31-3.43)
cab 740.64 740.88
(5.99-8.15) (6.01-8.21)
10.99+1.19 10.75+1.56
ons (8.46-12.17) (9.06-12.9)
1.9440.14 2.25+0,56
(1.74-2.12) (1.57-3.11)
0.90.09 0.8740.15
(0.74-1.01) (0.74-1.11)
a 3,340.34 3.2740.38
(2.88-3.8) (2.93-3.88)
3.940.14 6.30.69 5,46+0.52
(3.8-4) (52-73) (5.2-6.43)
5.15+0.21 7.1740.75 7.02+0.41
(55.3) (6.09-8.3) (6.09-7.76)
4.05+0.07 6.2+0.77 5 3840.52
(44.1) (5.3-7.4) (5.3-6.53)
2.15+0.21 2.56+0.22 2.5140.22
(3-93) (2.2-2.8) (2.2-2.8)
1.95+0.07 3.03+0.18 340.76
(1.9-2) (2.8-3.3) (2.8-3.78)
5.9540.49 8.09+0.5 8.08+0.48
(5.66.3) (7.6-9) (7.6-8.83)
8.95+0.21 11.8440.65 11.94+0.63
(8.8-9.1) (11.2-12.9) (11.2-12.96)
2.2740.19 2.6140.36
(2-2.5) (2-3.16)
0.75+0.07 1.07+40.13 1.05+0.16
(0.7-0.8) (0.9-1.3) (0.9-1.28)
2.45+0.07 3.1440.57 3.5140.28
(2.4-2.5) (1.9-3.6) (1.9-3.98)
—
N
3.940.14 6.93+0.96 6.1+0.46
(3.8-4) (5.8-8.4) (5.8-6.9)
Te 6.62+1.39 5.26+0.63
(5.16-9.2) (4.3-6.02)
= 10.38+1.54 11.2843.87
(7.75-11.91) (8.06-17.62)
10.4941.13 10.47+1.81
(8.18-11.68) (8.72-13.2)
ae 12.7541.42 12.5941.77
(10.16-14.8) (10.91-15.17)
72242 6.5142.65
(2.63-8.58) (3.2-9.01)
21.9443.75 21.243.05
(16.14-26.4) (16.18-24.13)
7” 4.3440.7 4. 0640.85
(3.05-5.09) (2.93-4.94)
3.66+0.5 3.79+0.84
(3.04-4.41) (2.68-4.84)
a 3.85+0.64 3.8141
(2.75-4.64) (2.91-5.35)
0.86+0.09 0.79+0.15
(0.73-1.05) (0.59-0.98)
at 1.6140.22 1.8140.29 1.4540.07 2.0140.22 2.24+0.4
(1.33-1.92) (1.59-2.31) (1.4+1.5) (1.8-2.4) (1.8-2.7)
is 2.0240.25 2.2940.45 1.75+0.21 2.56+0.24 2.76+0.42
(1.75-2.39) (1.86-3) (1.6-1.9) (2.4-3.1) (2.4-3.45)
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 149 December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e327
a 11.27+0.74 11.5141.22
(10.1-12.4) (10.1-13.61)
8. 4540.35 11.6640.52 11.4+0.56
(8.2-8.7) (11.1-12.4) (11.1-12.2)
10.3+0.28 14.46+0.79 14.37+0.85
(10.1-10.5) (13.5-15.6) (13.5-15.59)
8.10.64 6.1642
(7.4-9.4) (7.4-9.2)
17.940.28 27.37+1.89 24.71+1.96
(17.7-18.1) (25.2-30.1) (25.2-28.35)
2.56+0.62 4.86+0.53 4.3640.64
(2.12-3) (4.4-5.8) (4.4-5.78)
2.65+0.21 4.24+0.44 4.3640.57
(2.5-2.8) (3.8-5.1) (3.8-5.1)
2.6+0.14 4.04+0.43 4.2+0.49
(2.5-2.7) (3.8-5) (3.8-4.9)
0.77+0.08 0.82+0.11
(0.7-0.9) (0.7-0.99)
59
(N
@
2
2
1
1
1
6
1
3
3
Zz
pee
11.07+1.54 8 340.28 12.26+0.85 12.7141.36
(8.03-12.79) (9.47-13.09) (8.1-8.5) (11.2-13.6) (11.2-14.16)
pe
| te
23
A new species of Bolitoglossa
Table 2 (continued). Morphometric data for Bolitoglossa bolanosi sp. nov., B. kamuk, and B. pesrubra. These data were obtained
prior to morphometric correction.
S| Mean+S.D. (Range) Mean+S.D. (Range) Mean+S.D. (Range)
| = 8) dN=5) | QW=1 | SW=?2) 9(N=7) 3 (N=8)
aa 4.44+0.76 4.56+0.87 - 3.45+0.21 4.9640.4 5.17+0.77
(3.63-5.74) (4.5-5.6) (4.5-6.02)
(3.44—5 42) (3.3-3.6)
4.34+0.58 4.23+0.91 4,640.35 4.78+0.39
(3.27-5.53) (4.1-5.2) (4.1-53)
(3.42-5.03)
0.8+0.1 0.86+0.13
— 0.9+0.16 0.77+0.1 0.65+0.07
(0.68-1.24) (0.67-0.92) (0.6-0.7) (0.7-1) (0.7-1.1)
‘a 1.82+0.19 1.93+0.16 he 1,240.14 2.3140.22 2 4440.5
(1.1-1.3) (2-2.7) (23.09)
(1.52-2.05) (1.77-2.15)
oi 2.44+0.44 2.46+0.22 im 1.65+0.07 2.79+0.17 3.05+0.42
(1.66-2.94) (1.6-1.7) (2.6-3) (2.6-3.73)
0.23+0.01 0.24+0.01
(2.15-2.68)
0.24+0.01 0.24+0
VGS/SL (0.24-0.24) (0.22-0.24) (0.22-0.25)
0.25+0.01
(0.23-0.26) (0.23-0.27)
0.29+0.02 0.35+0.05 0.32+0.03 0.37+0.04
ia (0.26-0.32) (0.29-0.43) (0.29-0.38) (0.29-0.42)
0.51+0.03 0.51+0.05 0.54+0.01 0.51+0.02
PORES (0.47-0.58) (0.46-0.58) a
(0.53-0.55) (0.53-0.54)
0.16+0.01 0.15+0.01 0.15+0.01 0.14+0.01 0.15+0.01
HEW/SL
HEW/AGL
0.41+0.04
oNTABEN (0.36-0.45)
WT3/FOW
WF3/HAW
(0.15-0.17)
0.31+0.03
(0.25-0.36)
0.26+0.01
(0.25-0.27)
0.24+0.01
(0.22-0.26)
0.3740.03
(0.33-0.4)
0.4140.02
(0.37-0.44)
0.5440.04
(0.48-0.59)
0.66+0.06
(0.55-0.73)
0.2740.03
(0.24-0.3)
0.55+0.05
(0.48-0.63)
0.43+0.08
(0.29-0.58)
0.20.03
(0.16-0.24)
0.24+0.03
(0.21-0.28)
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
(0.15-0.17)
0.3140.02
(0.28-0.34)
0.45+0.03
(0.41-0.48)
0.26+0.05
(0.23-0.26)
0.36+0.03
(0.33-0.41)
0.3140.03
(0.26-0.32)
0.4740.09
(0.35-0.54)
0.21+0.03
(0.16-0.26)
0.156
0.311
0.383
0.27+0.01
(0.26-0.28) ou
0.232
0.402
0.4+0.03
(0.37-0.43) oer
0.58+0.07 ae 0.52+0.06 0.59+40.04 0.62+0.07
(0.49-0.66) (0.47-0.56) (0.54-0.66) (0.54-0.76)
0.70.06 ne 0.67+0.07
(0.64-0.79) (0.62-0.72)
(0.14—0.15)
0.29+0.01
(0.28-0.29)
0.38+0.03
(0.36-0.4)
0.24+0.01
(0.23-0.24)
0.23+0.01
(0.22-0.23)
0.3140.03
(0.29-0.33)
0.36+0.01
(0.34—0.37)
0.2340.02
(0.22-0.25)
0.56+0.08 non 0.48+0.05
(0.47-0.64) (0.44-0.52)
(0.12-0.16)
0.26+0.02
(0.23-0.29)
0.42+0.03
(0.37-0.46)
0.24+0.01
(0.22-0.26)
0.22+0.02
(0.19-0.24)
0.35+0.03
(0.31-0.4)
0.39+0.02
(0.37-0.42)
0.7+0.07
(0.63-0.84)
0.33+0.04
(0.27-0.39)
0.56+0.05
(0.51-0.65)
(0.12-0.16)
0.28+0.01
(0.23-0.3)
0.43+0.1
(0.37-0.49)
0.26+0.02
(0.22-0.3)
0.24+0.02
(0.19-0.27)
0.37+0.03
(0.31-0.43)
0.42+0.03
(0.37-0.45)
0.73+0.09
(0.63-0.9)
0.35+0.07
(0.27-0.45)
0.6+0.08
(0.51-0.71)
Aa 0.4+0.05 0.5+0.05 0.51+0.1
(0.37-0.43) (0.42-0.57) (0.42-0.68)
0.273
150
0.49+0.08 0.56+0.06
(0.42-0.6) nae (0.52-0.6)
0.17+0.01 none 0.19+0.03
(0.16-0.18) (0.17-0.21)
0.23+0.02
(0.21-0.24)
December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e327
0.5+0.05
(0.45-0.58)
0.16+0.03
(0.14-0.22)
0.18+0.01
(0.17-0.21)
0.53+0.08
(0.45-0.63)
0.17+0.02
(0.14-0.21)
0.19+0.03
(0.17-0.24)
Arias et al.
102.3-117.2%); dorsal ground color relatively uniform,
orange to black (dorsal ground usually mottled or blotchy);
males with rounded snout (snout strongly truncated in
males). Bolitoglossa pesrubra (Taylor, 1952) has hands
and feet more webbed (Fig. 5C—D), usually less than the
ultimate phalange free (with at least the ultimate phalange
free beyond the interdigital tissue margin, Fig. 5A—B); has
red color on forelimbs and usually on hind limbs (dorsum
variable but never with red on hind limbs or forelimbs).
Hands relatively wider, HaW/HeW = 0.61+0.07 (hands
narrower, HaW/HeW = 0.56+0.06).
Description of holotype. Adult male having a SL of
49.05 mm (Fig. 4). Head slightly wider than neck and
shoulders (HeW 7.3 mm, NeW 6.2 mm, ShW 7.1 mm),
with the greatest width of the head just posterior to the
articulation of the jaws; truncate in dorsal outline and
rounded to truncate in profile; snout moderate (SnL 3.4
mm, 6.9% of SL), with nearly terminal non-protruding
small nostrils (LNH 0.6 mm, RNW 0.4 mm) directed
anterolaterally; internarial area convex in dorsal outline.
Snout protruding beyond the anterior margin of the lower
lip in lateral view. Eyes relatively large (EW = 92% of
SnL), weakly protruding beyond the dorsal and ventral
outline of the head, directed anterolaterally, with a
distinct suborbital groove. Top of head flat and smooth,
tapering slightly toward anterior terminus, lacking
contrasting interorbital or other dermal structures.
Canthus rostralis weakly rounded: intercanthal area flat
to slightly convex; and loreal region slightly concave.
Evident cirri (nasolabial protuberances) on tip of snout;
nasolabial grooves start at ventrolateral margins of nares
and terminate in a cirrus. Gular fold is well-defined,
starting on the dorsolateral portion of the neck, below the
postorbital groove. Evident mental gland is visible under
the skin of the anterior intermandibular region.
Arms relatively long and slender (FLL = 12.6 mm,
25.7% of SL), without noticeable hypertrophied forearm
compared to the upper arm. Hands well-developed and
slender (HaL = 5.4 mm, 40.9% of VGS; HaW = 4.8 mm,
65.8% of HeW). Fingers I, III, and IV protrude freely,
with at least the ultimate phalange free beyond interdigital
tissue margin (LF2 2.3 mm, LF3 3.0 mm; Fig. 5). Tips of
fingers rounded; terminal pads weakly discernible on the
ventral surfaces of fingers. Relative lengths of fingers on
right hand: 1< IV <I < WI.
Legs moderately long and slender (HLL 13.1 mm,
26.7% of SL). Feet well-developed and slender (FoL
5.5 mm, 41.7% of VGS; FoW 5.7 mm, 78.1% of
HeW). Toes II, HI, IV, and V protruding freely beyond
interdigital tissue margin (LT2 1.9 mm, LT3 2.7 mm),
toe I with minimal indentation at interdigital spaces.
Toe III is most free of interdigital tissue, with about the
entire distal phalanx protruding. Tips of toes rounded;
terminal pads weakly discernible on ventral distal
surface of toes. Relative lengths of toes on right foot: I
<V<I<IV<III
Body subcylindrical (slightly wider than high) in
cross-section, and relatively slender (TW = 6.0 mm; TW
= 26.5% of AGL). Between the axilla and groin, 11 costal
grooves are visible, 13 if counting axillary and inguinal
grooves; costal grooves are most visible on ventral and
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
lateral portions of the body. Adpressed limbs separated
by one costal fold; 12 costal folds total between axilla
and groin. The tail is long, cylindrical in cross-section,
with an evident constriction at the base, and some caudal
grooves discernible on the anterior portion of the tail. The
skin on the surfaces of the head, body, limbs, and tail is
smooth.
Coloration in life. The ground color of dorsal surfaces of
the head, trunk, tail, hind limbs, and forelimbs is brownish
black to brownish violet with numerous fine lighter
patches of chromatophores scattered throughout the
dorsal surface, especially concentrated on the head. The
head and hindlimbs are lighter than the trunk. A pair of
irregular dorsolateral stripes, which run from the tail base
to the intercanthal area crossing the superior eyelids, are
formed by yellowish-bronze blotches. The iris 1s bright
dark bronze with a dark brownish-black reticulation.
The upper surfaces of the arms are lighter than the trunk,
pinkish brown, with orange blotches in the proximal
portion of the humerus and on the ventrolateral surface
of the ulna. The upper surface of the legs is similar in
color to the trunk, uniform brownish black, except in the
foot which is paler. The dorsal and dorsolateral surfaces
of the tail are nearly uniform brownish black.
The ventrolateral surfaces of the body, tail, hindlimbs,
and forelimbs are lighter than the dorsal surface. The
gular surfaces are paler than the venter, consisting of
lighter brown with a paler blotch on the anterior part,
the mental gland. The ventral surface of the trunk and
the tail are slightly lighter than the dorsal surface. The
ventral surfaces of the arms and legs are lighter than
the dorsal surfaces with irregular orange blotches. The
palmar and plantar surfaces are light brown with black
chromatophores.
Coloration in ethanol. After more than seven years in
ethanol (70%), the overall coloration of the holotype
has darkened throughout and contains a principal dark
brown-blackish tone.
Measurements (in mm), limb interval, and percentages
of the holotype. SL 49.05; TL 57.5; ShW 7.1; HeW 7.3;
NeW 6.2; EW 3.2; SnL 3.4; JSL 8.2; LGFS 12.9; LNH
0.6; RNW 0.4; IND 3.1; NLP 1.1; ICD 3.9; HLL 13.1;
FLL 12.6; TW 6.0; VGS 13.2; FSL 15.2; UHL 9.0; AGL
22.8; VL 4.9; HaW 4.8; HaL 5.4; LF2 2.3; LF3 3.0; WE3
1.0; FoW 5.7; FoL 5.5; LT2 1.9; LT3 2.7; WT3 0.9. Limb
interval 1. Measurements in relative percentages: VGS/
SL 26.9%; IND/HeW 42.5%; AGL/SL 46.5%; HeW/SL
14.9%; HeW/AGL 32.0%; SnL/ HeW 46.6%; LNH/HeW
8.2%; LNH/SL 1.2%; RNW/HeW 5.5%; RNW/SL 0.8%;
HLL/SL 26.7%; FLL/SL 25.7%; HaL/VGS 40.9%; FoL/
VGS 41.7%; HaW/HeW 65.7%; FoW/HeW 78.1%; LT2/
FoL 34.5%; LF2/HaL 42.6%; WT3/FoW 15.8%; WF3/
HaW 20.8%.
Noteworthy variation. The female paratypes (UCR
22421 and UCR 24245) have more rounded snouts,
and much less defined and protruding cirri or nasolabial
protuberances, which are sexually dimorphic features. In
coloration, this species is extremely polymorphic, some
December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e327
A new species of Bolitoglossa
3
Females e
Canonical Function 2 (24.8%)
A
Canonical Function 2 (11.2%)
Males
A
6 -3 0 3
Canonical Function 1 (75.2%)
4 -2 0 2
Canonical Function 1 (88.8%)
Species @ B. bolanosi sp. nov. & B. kamuk @ B. pesrubra
Fig. 3. Linear discriminant analysis shows the morphological separation between the new species and the two species close to it.
individuals are almost uniform black, which 1s common
in juveniles (UCR 22247, Fig. 6B). The paratopotype
(UCR 22964, Fig. 6A) has the pair of dorsolateral stripes
more vivid and continuous, the blotches in the upper
eyelid are iridescent green; in addition, it has a band
of pale orange from posterior head to tail, where it is
suffused with the red of the tail. The presence of red on
the tail is common; generally the red color in the proximal
portion is only on the dorsal surface, but the tail becomes
completely red in the distal portion. Several specimens
showed a similar coloration morpho “mottled” (Fig. 6C),
with ground color brownish black to reddish brown with
numerous and irregular yellow to red blotches or spots;
these specimens lack the dorsolateral stripes. The female
UCR 24245 (Fig. 6D) has a striking coloration pattern
formed by large yellow blotches about a brownish-black
ground color; although less evident this specimen has the
pair of dorsolateral stripes but the blotches are larger and
suffused in the back.
Measurements (in mm), limb intervals, and
percentages of the paratypes. SL 39.4—50.0; ShwW
4.9-7.5; HeW 6.3-7.7; NeW 5.0-6.7; EW 1.8—3.2; SnL
2.4-3.4; JSL 6.0-8.2; LGFS 10.2-12.9; IND 1.7-3.1;
NLP 0.7-1.1; ICD 2.9-3.9; HLL 9.9-13.1; FLL 8.9-
17.6; TW 5.2-9.2: VGS 9.6-13.2; FSL 11.4—-15.2; UHL
6.8-9.0; AGL 18.6—26.4; VL 3.5—5.1; HaW 3.0-4.8; HaL
3.4—5.4; LF2 1.3-2.3; LF3 1.8-3.0; WE3 0.7—1.1; FoW
3.4-5.7; FoL 3.8-5.5; LT2 1.5—2.1; LT3 1.7—2.9; WT3
0.7—1.2. Limb intervals 3—5. Measurements in relative
percentages: VGS/SL 23.4—26.9%; IND/HeW 25.8—
42.6%; AGL/SL 46.4—57.6%; HeW/SL 14.5-16.9%;
HeW/AGL 25.2—35.7%; SnL/HeW 35.7-47.6%; HLL/
SL 24.6—26.8%; FLL/SL 22.3—26.1%; HaL/VGS 32.7-
40.5%; FoL/VGS 37.1-44.4%; HaW/HeW 48.0-66.3%;
FoW/HeW 54.5—78.6%; LT2/HeW 24.1-31.9%; LT3/
FoW 46.7-63.0%; LT2/FoL 34.9-45.8%; LF2/HaL 29 .3—
46.9%; WT3/FoW 15.5—24.1%; WF3/HaW 16.2—28.3%.
Etymology. The name “bolanos7’ is a patronym honoring
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
152
the Costa Rican herpetologist Federico Bolafios, and is
used as a noun in the genitive case. We name this species
after our dear friend in recognition of his scientific
contributions to the knowledge of the herpetology of
Costa Rica, as curator of the Herpetology section at
Museo de Zoologia of Universidad de Costa Rica, and as
the mentor of most herpetologists present in the country.
Habitat and natural history observations. The habitat
of Bolitoglossa bolanosi in the subalpine rain paramo is
characterized by having a very short dry season (one to
two months), annual precipitation ranging from 1,000
to 2,000 mm, and annual temperatures between 3 and 6
°C. The paramo vegetation consists of extensive, deep
moss mats, spongy soil, ferns, and small isolated trees
with arboreal bromeliads. Bolitoglossa bolanosi was
found within both moss and bromeliads. It also occurs
in Montane rain forest which is dominated by Quercus
covered with moss, with a great abundance of bryophytes
and epiphytes. The type locality occurs in the Montane
rain forest (Bolafios et al. 2005; Holdridge 1967),
characterized by a very short dry season (one to two
months), an annual precipitation range of 2,200 to 4,500
mm, and annual temperatures from 6 to 12 °C.
Very little is known about the natural history of B.
bolanosi, but it is important to note that females guarding
a clutch of eggs were found on Cerro Haku (December
2015) and Cerro Durika (January 2016), both under moss
on the floor. All specimens from Cerro Utyum were found
within bromeliads at heights of >3 m over the soil, despite
active searches in the moss of the paramo. Unlike in the
peaks Durika, Arbolado, and Haku, the specimens were
mainly found in the moss at <2 m over soil, despite active
searches in the bromeliads at >3 m above the ground
(especially on Cerro Arbolado and Cerro Haku). In the
summit of Cerro Durika, B. bolanosi is very near (~4 km)
to a site with B. pesrubra. In the summit of Cerro Utyum,
it is to only ~7 km to a site with B. kamuk, and in this peak
B. bolanosi is sympatric with an unnamed miniaturized
salamander related to B. pygmaea. In addition, the type
December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e327
Arias et al.
Fig. 4. Holotype of Bolitoglossa bolanosi sp. nov. (UCR 22965) in life on a white background. Photograph by Erick Arias.
ie
, i.
‘_f
£
npr, “9
“ak ag
Fig. 5. Dorsal views of the hand and foot of ae holotypes of (A-B) Bolitoglossa bolanosi sp. nov. (UCR 22965) and (C-D) B.
pesrubra in preservation. Photograph by Erick Arias.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 153 December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e327
A new species of Bolitoglossa
Fig. 6. In-life photographs of variations within Bolitoglossa bolanosi sp. nov. (A) Paratopotype male subadult UCR 22966, (B)
paratype juvenile UCR 24247, (C) paratype adult female UCR 22421, and (D) paratype adult female UCR 24245. Photographs A
and C by Erick Arias, B and D by Omar Ziitiga.
locality of B. splendida is only ~4 km from the site with
B. bolanosi.
Distribution. The known distribution area of Bolitoglossa
bolanosi is very small, restricted throughout to ~15 km
on the summits of the peaks Durika, Arbolado, Haku,
and Utyum on the Cordillera de Talamanca (Fig. 1). The
altitudinal range of the new species is 2,550—3,240 m
asl. All the populations of the new species were found in
primary vegetation (paramo and forest) and all are within
a protected area, La Amistad International Park.
Conservation status. The conservation status of this
species is uncertain; however, its known distribution
range is small (<20,000 km?) and all know populations
are restricted to summits of peaks, sites that are highly
vulnerable to forest fires and other effects of climate
change. We suggest that it should be tentatively
considered as Vulnerable (VU) following the IUCN
(2017) category criteria.
Discussion
Costa Rica hosts 56 species of salamanders, and it is the
sixth most diverse country in the World in terms of total
species richness and the most diverse relative to its total
area (AmphibiaWeb 2023; Boza-Oviedo et al. 2012; Frost
2023). Several new species of salamanders have been
described from ICA in this century (Arias and Kubicki
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
2018; Bolafios and Wake 2009; Boza-Oviedo et al. 2012:
Garcia-Paris et al. 2008; Hanken et al. 2005; Kubicki
2016; Kubicki and Arias 2016; Kubicki et al. 2022:
Wake et al. 2007). Nevertheless, the taxonomic studies
of salamanders in this region have been obscured due
to a conservative morphology (Arias and Kubicki 2018;
Boza-Oviedo et al. 2012; Kubicki et al. 2022). Recently,
Kubicki et al. (2022) found low genetic distances among
species of Nototriton from Costa Rica; however, they
showed that two different species of Nototriton coexist
(sympatry) in two sites, providing strong evidence of
speciation. We also found relatively low (Table 1) genetic
distances among the species of the B. subpalmata S.G.,
however, we found two sites separated by less than 7 km
ina straight line from where two different species occur. In
the first case, in the paramo of the Cerro Durika, samples
of B. bolanosi (UCR 24245-7) were found only 4 km
in a straight line from specimens of B. pesrubra (UCR
23049). The area separating these two sites consisted of
homogeneous paramo, lacking any significant features
that could be viewed as a barrier that would prevent the
potential mixture of individuals or genes. However, the
genetic distance among these organisms is 2.14% for
16S, providing evidence of genetic isolation. A second
case was found in the paramo of the Cerro Utyum, where
the B. bolanosi specimens (UCR 22421—7) were found
only 7 km ina straight line from B. kamuk (UCR 23047).
Similarly, these sites are separated by homogeneous
paramo and we found genetic distances of 1.35—1.8% for
December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e327
Arias et al.
16S. We acknowledge the limitations of our conclusions,
since our genetic analyses were based solely on the
mitochondrial results. However, we think that all the
evidence supports our hypothesis about the relationships
within the B. subpalmata S.G.
Bolitoglossa bolanosi is the fourth species of
salamander endemic to the paramo of ICA and the
Montane rain forest surrounding it. The other three
species also belong to the B. subpalmata S.G. Although
there are relatively few species, the role of the paramos
of ICA in the speciation of salamanders is interesting,
especially since the paramos correspond only to 0.3%
of the continental surface of Costa Rica (Kappelle and
Horn 2016). The current isolated patches of paramos in
ICA and its contraction-expansion dynamics in the past
can explain (in part) the species formation in this habitat.
In addition, it is noteworthy that the larger paramo in
Costa Rica, the Cerro Chirripo, has not been sampled for
salamanders. This paramo corresponds to two-thirds of all
paramo in the country. There is a need for more studies 1n
the paramos of ICA, especially due to the vulnerability of
this ecosystem to climate change (Enquist 2002; Nogués-
Bravo et al. 2007). In the past, B. pesrubra was relatively
common (Bolafios and Wake 2009; Vial 1968). However,
its populations have been greatly reduced (Boza-Oviedo
et al. 2012; Garcia-Paris et al. 2008), and we do not fully
understand the cause of this reduction.
Acknowledgements.—We thank Laura Marquez-
Valdelamar, Nelly Lopez, and Andrea Jiménez-Marin
for their laboratory assistance; Federico Bolafios for the
use of specimens from the Museo de Zoologia of the
Universidad de Costa Rica; and Omar Zufiiga and Olmer
Cordero who provided valuable assistance in the field
during the expeditions. EA thanks the Posgrado en Ciencias
Biologicas for supporting this study, the CONACYyT for
a student grant (CVU/Becario) 626946/330343, and
the Programa de Innovacion y Capital Humano para la
Competitividad PINN-MICITT for a student grant (PED-
0339-15-2). The fieldwork was partially supported by the
National Geography Society (Grant number W-346-14).
The laboratory work was partially funded by Direccion
General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, UNAM,
under grant PAPHT-UNAM no. IN205521 to GPO. We
acknowledge the Costa Rican Ministry of Environment
and Energy (MINAE) for providing this expedition’s
corresponding scientific collecting permits (SINAC-SE-
GAS-PI-R 007-2013 and 59-2015).
Literature Cited
AmphibiaWeb. 2023. AmphibiaWeb: Information on
Amphibian Biology and Conservation. Berkeley,
California, USA. Available: http://amphibiaweb.org
[Accessed: 13 March 2023].
Arias E, Kubicki B. 2018. A new moss salamander,
genus Nototriton (Caudata: Plethodontidae), from the
Cordillera de Talamanca, in the Costa Rica-Panama
border region. Zootaxa 4369: 487-500.
Bolanos F, Wake DB. 2009. Two new species of montane
web-footed salamanders (Plethodontidae: Bolitoglossa)
from the Costa Rica-Panama border region. Zootaxa
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
1981: 57-68.
Bolafios R, Watson V, Tosi J. 2005. Mapa Ecoldgico
de Costa Rica (Zonas de Vida), Seguin el Sistema de
Clasificacién de Zonas de Vida del Mundo de L.R.
Holdridge, Escala 1:750 000. Centro Cientifico
Tropical, San José, Costa Rica.
Boza-Oviedo E, Rovito SM, Chaves G, Garcia-Rodriguez
A, Artavia LG, Bolafios F, Wake DB. 2012. Salamanders
from the eastern Cordillera de Talamanca, Costa Rica,
with descriptions of five new species (Plethodontidae:
Bolitoglossa, Nototriton, and Oedipina) and natural
history notes from recent expeditions. Zootaxa 3309:
36-61.
Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment
with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids
Research 32: 1,792—1,797.
Enquist CAF. 2002. Predicted regional impacts of climate
change on the geographical distribution and diversity of
tropical forests in Costa Rica. Journal of Biogeography
29: 519-534.
Frost DR. 2023. Amphibian Species of the World: an
Online Reference. Version 6.0. American Museum of
Natural History, New York, New York, USA. Available:
http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.
html [Accessed: 13 March 2023].
Garcia-Paris M, Good DA, Parra-Olea G, Wake DB.
2000. Biodiversity of Costa Rican salamanders:
implications of high levels of genetic differentiation
and phylogeographic — structure for species
formation. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America 97. 1,640—
1,647.
Garcia-Paris M, Parra-Olea G, Wake DB. 2008. Description
of a new species of the Bolitoglossa subpalmata group
(Caudata: Plethodontidae) from Costa Rica. The
Herpetological Journal 18: 23-31.
Hanken J, Wake DB, Savage JM. 2005. A solution to the
large black salamander problem (genus Bolitoglossa)
in Costa Rica and Panama. Copeia 2005: 227-245.
Holdridge LR. 1967. Life Zone Ecology. Revised edition.
Tropical Science Center, San José, Costa Rica. 206 p.
Kappelle M, Horn SP. 2016. The Paramo ecosystem of
Costa Rica’s highlands. Pp. 492—523 In: Costa Rican
Ecosystems. Editor, Kappelle M. The University of
Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 744 p.
Kubicki B. 2016. A new species of salamander (Caudata:
Plethodontidae: Oedipina) from the central Caribbean
foothills of Costa Rica. Mesoamerican Herpetology 3:
819-840.
Kubicki B, Arias E. 2016. A beautiful new yellow
salamander, genus Bolitoglossa (Caudata: Plethodon-
tidae), from the northeastern slopes of the Cordillera de
Talamanca, Costa Rica. Zootaxa 4184: 329-346.
Kubicki B, Reyes A, Arias E. 2022. Revised taxonomy
and distributions of Costa Rican Moss Salamanders
(Caudata: Plethodontidae: Nofotriton), — with
descriptions of new taxa. Zootaxa 5194: 451-496.
Lanfear R, Calcott B, Ho SY, Guindon S. 2012. Partition-
Finder: combined selection of partitioning schemes
and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses.
Molecular Biology and Evolution 29: 1,695—1,701.
Lanfear R, Frandsen PB, Wright AM, Senfeld T, Calcott
December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e327
A new species of Bolitoglossa
B. 2017. PartitionFinder 2: new methods for selecting
partitioned models of evolution for molecular and
morphological phylogenetic analyses. Molecular
Biology and Evolution 34: 772-773.
Lleonart J, Salat J, Torres GJ. 2000. Removing allometric
effects of body size in morphological analysis. Journal
of Theoretical Biology 205: 85-93.
Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. 2010. Creating the
CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large
phylogenetic trees. Pp. 1-8 In: Proceedings of
the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop
(GCE), 14 November 2010. Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Moritz C, Schneider CJ, Wake DB. 1992. Evolutionary
relationships within the Ensatina eschscholtzii complex
confirm the ring species interpretation. Systematic
Biology 41: 273-291.
Nogués-Bravo D, Araujo MB, Errea MP, Martinez-Rica JP.
2007. Exposure of global mountain systems to climate
warming during the 21* century. Global Environmental
Change 17: 420-428.
Palumbi S, Martin A, Romano S, McMillan WO, Stice
L, Grabowski G. 1991. The Simple Fool's Guide to
PCR, Version 2.0. Special Publication, Department of
Zoology and Kewalo Marine Laboratory. University of
Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. 45 p.
Parra-Olea G, Garcia-Paris M, Wake DB. 2004. Molecular
diversification of salamanders of the tropical American
genus Bolitoglossa (Caudata: Plethodontidae) and
its evolutionary and biogeographical implications.
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 81: 325-346.
R Core Team. 2013. R: A Language and Environment
for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical
Computing, Vienna, Austria. Version 3.3.3. Available:
https://www.R-project.org/.
Rambaut A, Suchard MA, Xie W, Drummond AJ. 2014.
Tracer v1.6.1. Available: http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/
Tracer.
Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, Ayres DL,
Darling A, Hohna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard M,
Huelsenbeck JP. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian
phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large
model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539-542.
Rovito SM, Parra-Olea G, Recuero E, Wake DB. 2015.
Diversification and biogeographical history of
Neotropical plethodontid salamanders. Zoological
Journal of the Linnean Society 175: 167-188.
Sambrook J, Russell DW. 2006. Purification of nucleic
acids by extraction with phenol: chloroform. Cold
Spring Harbor Protocols (2006): pdb-prot4455.
Savage JM. 2002. The Amphibians and Reptiles of Costa
Rica: a Herpetofauna between Two Continents,
between Two Seas. The University of Chicago Press,
Chicago, Illinois, USA. 934 p.
Sukumaran JM, Holder MT. 2010a. SumtTrees:
Phylogenetic Tree Summarization. Version 4.4.0.
Available: https://github.com/jeetsukumaran/DendroPy.
Sukumaran JM, Holder MT. 2010b. DendroPy: A Python
library for phylogenetic computing. Bioinformatics 26:
1,569-1,571.
Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S.
2013. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics
Analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution
30: 2,725—2,729.
Vial JL. 1968. The ecology of the tropical salamander,
Bolitoglossa subpalmata, in Costa Rica. Revista de
Biologia Tropical 15: 13-115.
Wake DB. 1987. Adaptive radiation of salamanders in
Middle American cloud forests. Annals of the Missouri
Botanical Garden 74: 242-264.
Wake DB, Savage JM, Hanken J. 2007. Montane
salamanders from the Costa Rica-Panama_ border
region, with descriptions of two new species of
Bolitoglossa. Copeia 2007: 556-565.
Zwickl DJ. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the
phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence
datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. Ph.D.
Dissertation, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas,
USA. 125 p.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 156
Erick Arias is a Costa Rican herpetologist who earned his Bachelor’s degree in Biology at Universidad
de Costa Rica in 2013. Erick then joined Gabriela’s Lab at Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México
(UNAM) where he received a Doctorate in Systematics in 2019 studying the systematic, taxonomy, and
biogeography of the neotropical frogs in the Craugastor podiciferus species group. In 2022, Erick joined the
Universidad de Costa Rica as professor and researcher. Erick’s current research focuses on the systematics,
taxonomy, and biogeography of the amphibians and reptiles of Costa Rica, especially direct-developing
frogs and salamanders.
Gerardo Chaves is a retired biologist, associated with the Zoology Museum of the University of Costa Rica.
His undergraduate thesis focused on the arrival of Olive Ridley Sea Turtles, but most of his professional
work has been oriented towards the ecology and taxonomy of the Costa Rican herpetofauna. His research
activity is directed towards understanding the declines of amphibian populations in Mesoamerica and filling
in information gaps in the Cordillera de Talamanca. From this research, he has published articles in several
journals related to the ecology and taxonomy of Neotropical herpetofauna. Gerardo is currently the Chair of
the IUCN Amphibian Specialist Group in Costa Rica.
Gabriela Parra Olea is a researcher at the Instituto de Biologia, UNAM, Mexico, and curator of Mexico’s
national collection of amphibians and reptiles. Her research is focused on the molecular systematics and
conservation of Mexican amphibians. Her laboratory is formed by students and postdocs all working on
research projects in the systematics, taxonomy, conservation genetics, and impact of infectious diseases,
specifically chytridiomycosis, on the conservation of amphibians.
December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e327
Arias et al.
Appendix 1. Institutional voucher numbers, locality information, and GenBank accession numbers for the specimens
used in the molecular phylogenetic analyses. Museum collection acronyms follow Frost (2023) with the addition of
EAP to refer to Erick Arias field numbers and CRARC to refer to the Costa Rica Amphibian Research Center private
collection. NV= No voucher. CR = Costa Rica, HN = Honduras, MX = Mexico.
Species
B. mexicana
B. aurae
B. sombra
B. compacta
B. splendida
B. bramei
B. bramei
B. bramei
B. bramei
B. bramei
B. bramei
B. gomezi
B. gomezi
B. gomezi
B. gomezi
B. gomezi
B. gomezi
B. gomezi
B. gomezi
B. gomezi
B. gomezi
B. gomezi
B. gomezi
B. gomezi
B. gracilis
B. gracilis
B. gracilis
B. tica
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
pease [owimramemer [ae fos fam |
ees [aawsearmener [aw fae [ae [
oon [omsearence [ave fore [oor [
MVZ229170 Paraiso, Cartago, CR 1680 9/692 -83.782 AY526121
MVZ229171 Paraiso, Cartago, CR 1680 9.692 -83.782 AY526122
UCR20541 Paraiso, Cartago, CR 1400 9.734 -83.764 OR162558
UCR12065 Guarco, Cartago, CR 2440 9.686 -83.894 AY526137
157 December 2023 | Volume 17 | Numbe
cyt b
GU725470
KX779528
AY526174
JQ899193
JQ899181
AF212066
JQ899189
JQ899190
JQ899172
OR147299
OR147300
JQ899184
JQ899185
JQ899186
JQ899187
JQ899188
JQ899170
JQ899177
JQ899178
JQ899179
JQ899180
JQ899169
JQ899171
JQ899176
AF212067
AF212068
AF212089
r1&2 | e327
A new species of Bolitoglossa
Appendix 1 (continued). Institutional voucher numbers, locality information, and GenBank accession numbers for
the specimens used in the molecular phylogenetic analyses. Museum collection acronyms follow Frost (2023) with
the addition of EAP to refer to Erick Arias field numbers and CRARC to refer to the Costa Rica Amphibian Research
Center private collection. NV= No voucher. CR = Costa Rica, HN = Honduras, MX = Mexico.
enne ade Collection locality Elevation (m) | Latitude | Longitude cyt b
UCR20514 Paraiso, Cartago, CR 2300 9.712 -83.858 JQ899162 JQ899192
B. subpalmata | MVZ190875 Barva, Heredia, CR 1850 10.133 pwr | = | AF212093
B. subpalmata | MVZ194827 San Ramon, Alajuela, CR 1500 10.033 -84.483 AF212090
B. subpalmata | MVZ194828 San Ramon, Alajuela, CR 1500 10.033 -84.483 EU448107 AF212091
B. subpalmata | MVZ194889 Se usaed Corauade; Sah 1700 9,998 -83.964 p= | AF212095
B. subpalmata | MVZ229172 Monte Verde, Puntarenas, CR 1500 AF416697 | AF212094
iy nnaiman| SY -Bisnte Heredia, CR ND ND ND AF212092
Carrillo
B. subpalmata | UCR20833 Alfaro Ruiz, Alajuela, CR 1600 10.177 | -84.391 | OR162562
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 158 December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e327
mi ee UCR22423 Buenos Aires, Puntarenas, CR 2870 9.323 -83.187 OR162573 | OR147309
cating UCR22422 Buenos Aires, Puntarenas, CR 2870 9.323 -83.187 | OR162571 | OR147307
Arias et al.
Appendix 1 (continued). Institutional voucher numbers, locality information, and GenBank accession numbers for
the specimens used in the molecular phylogenetic analyses. Museum collection acronyms follow Frost (2023) with
the addition of EAP to refer to Erick Arias field numbers and CRARC to refer to the Costa Rica Amphibian Research
Center private collection. NV= No voucher. CR = Costa Rica, HN = Honduras, MX = Mexico.
Species eran att Collection locality Elevation (m) | Latitude | Longitude cyt b
ss eee UCR24245 Buenos Aires, Puntarenas, CR 3240 9.374 -83.303 | OR162568 | OR147304
a on
=
=a
AF212075
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 159 December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e327
A new species of Bolitoglossa
Appendix 2. Specimens examined in the morphological analysis. All voucher numbers below are ‘UCR’
numbers, and the specimens were housed at the Museo de Zoologia at the Universidad de Costa Rica.
Bolitoglossa bolanosi sp. nov.
COSTA RICA: Limon, Talamanca, Cerro Utyum: (224212); Puntarenas, Buenos Aires, Cerro
Arbolado: (22965); Puntarenas, Buenos Aires, Cerro Haku: (242459, 24246); Puntarenas,
Buenos Aires, Cerro Haku: (22741-4°, 227453); Puntarenas, Buenos Aires, Cerro Utyum:
(224224, 224239, 22424, 224259).
Bolitoglossa kamuk
COSTA RICA: Limon, Talamanca, Cerro Dika: (23047); Limon, Talamanca, Cerro Kamuk:
(208523).
Bolitoglossa pesrubra
COSTA RICA: Cartago, El Guarco, Cerro de la Muerte: (23912, 224369); Cartago, Paraiso, Cerro
de la Muerte: (138106, 19034, 1912592, 190999, 23634); San José, Dota, Cerro de la Muerte:
(120674, 207932, 20797-92); San José. Pérez Zeled6on, Cuerici: (117124, 117574, 12109’).
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 160 December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 & 2 | e327
Official journal website:
amphibian-reptile-conservation.org
Lan Amphibian & Reptile Conservation
A 17(1 & 2) [Taxonomic Section]: 161-173 (e328).
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FB17AF57-AAE5-4668-8D22-1722DAEF4AA5
Two new species of gymnophthalmid lizards of the genus
Petracola (Squamata: Cercosaurinae) from the Andes of
northeastern Peru, and their phylogenetic relationships
12,3."Luis Mamani, *°Victor J. Vargas, ?*°Juan C. Chaparro, and °Alessandro Catenazzi
'Programa de Doctorado en Sistemdatica y Biodiversidad, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanogrdaficas, Universidad de Concepcion (UdeC),
Concepcion, CHILE *Museo de Historia Natural de la Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad del Cusco (MHNC), Plaza de Armas s/n
(Paraninfo Universitario), Cusco, PERU *Museo de Biodiversidad del Pern (MUBI), Cusco, PERU *Asociacion Pro Fauna Silvestre Ayacucho,
Huamanga, Ayacucho, PERU °Servicio Nacional Forestal y de Fauna Silvestre (SERFOR), Lima, PERU ‘Department of Biological Sciences,
Florida International University (FIU), Miami, Florida 33199, USA
Abstract.—The small and semi-fossorial lizards of the genus Petracola are distributed in the Andes from central
to northern Peru, on both sides of the dry valley of the Maranon River. Very little is known about the taxonomy
of Petracola, but it is presumed that this genus harbors a higher number of species than is currently known.
Here, we used a Maximum Likelihood (ML) molecular phylogenetic analysis using concatenated fragments of
four mitochondrial genes (12S, 16S, cyt-b, and ND4) and one nuclear gene (c-mos), and the revision of museum
specimens, to determine the species diversity of populations of Petracola on both sides of the Maranon River.
Our results show that Petracola is a monophyletic genus composed of three independent lineages. The first
lineage includes two undescribed species from the right side of the Maranon River, which we describe herein.
The second lineage corresponds to P. ventrimaculatus, and the third lineage includes P. waka which contains
undescribed species. Among the two new species from the right side of the Maranon River, P. amazonensis
can be identified by having only the first superciliary expanded to the dorsal surface, two pairs of genials
in contact, absence of a loreal scale, venter orange with black spots forming a transverse band, absence of
precloacal pores, and a maximum SVL of 43.0 mm in females; whereas P. shurugojalcapi can be identified
by having two genials in contact, absence of a loreal scale, two discontinuous superciliaries, black venter,
dorsum dark brown or black with some cream spots, and an absence of precloacal pores. The two new species
increase the diversity of this genus to seven species, four of which inhabit the right side of the dry valley of
the Maranon River. However, like other genera of gymnophthalmid Andean lizards, the diversity of Petracola is
still underestimated.
Keywords. Andean lizard, Cercosaurini, dry valley, endemic species, northern Andes, Marafion River, sem1-fossoriality
Citation: Mamani L, Vargas VJ, Chaparro JC, Catenazzi A. 2023. Two new species of gymnophthalmid lizards of the genus Petracola (Squamata:
Cercosaurinae) from the Andes of northeastern Peru, and their phylogenetic relationships. Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 17(1 & 2) [Taxonomic
Section]: 161-173 (e328).
Copyright: © 2023 Mamani et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License [Attribution
4.0 International (CC BY 4.0): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/], which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original author and source are credited. The offcial and authorized publication credit sources, which will be duly enforced, are
as follows: official journal title Amphibian & Reptile Conservation; official journal website: amphibian-reptile-conservation.org.
Accepted: 4 October 2023; Published: 30 December 2023
Introduction The systematics and taxonomy of Petracola are poorly
developed, and geographic information gaps prevent an
The genus Petracola Doan and Castoe, 2005, isa poorly —_ appreciation of the full diversity and distribution of the
studied Andean lineage of small and semi-fossorial
lizards distributed in the central and northern Andes of
Peru, on both margins of the dry valley of the Marafion
River (DVMR) (Doan and Castoe 2005; Kizirian et al.
2008; Kohler and Lehr 2004; Uzzell 1970). The species
of Petracola inhabit ecosystems of montane cloud
forests, inter-Andean valleys, and wet puna at elevations
from 1,889 to 3,600 m asl.
Correspondence. luismamanic@gmail.com
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
genus. The type species of Petracola, P. ventrimaculatus
(Boulenger, 1900), was initially assigned to Proctoporus
by Boulenger (1900). Previously, based on morphological
characters such as the presence of smooth dorsal scales,
three postparietal scales, short limbs, and the presence
of entire palpebral disc, Uzzell (1970) assigned P.
ventrimaculatus to the Proctoporus pachyurus group.
Further analyses based on molecular data and a taxonomic
December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 | e328
Two new species of Petracola from Peru
review led to the creation of the genus Petracola (Castoe et
al. 2004; Doan and Castoe 2005), which has been supported
by recent studies (Goicoechea et al. 2012; Mamani et al.
2020, 2022; Moravec et al. 2018; Torres-Carvajal et al.
2016). Species of Petracola are phylogenetically related
to Andean speciose linages containing Cercosaura,
Potamites, and Proctoporus, and minor lineages such as
“Cercosaura manicata_ boliviana,’’ Dendrosauridion,
Selvasaura, and Wilsonosaura (Mamani et al. 2020,
2022; Moravec et al. 2018; Rojas-Runjaic et al. 2021).
Despite the increasing knowledge about high-Andean
gymnophthalmids accumulated over the past decade,
the diversity of gymnophthalmid species continues to be
underestimated.
Currently, the genus contains five species: Petracola
angustisoma Echevarria and Venegas, 2015; P
labioocularis (Kohler and Lehr, 2004); P pajatensis
Rodriguez and Mamani, 2020; P. ventrimaculatus,
and P waka, Kizirian, Bayefsky-Anand, Eriksson, Le
and Donnelly 2008. Although Kizirian et al. (2008)
hypothesized that P. ventrimaculatus and P. waka represent
complexes of species, only two more species have been
described since 2015 (Echevarria and Venegas 2015;
Rodriguez and Mamani 2020). Moreover, this genus has a
peculiar distribution on both sides of the DVMR, in which
Petracola angustisoma and P. pajatensis are distributed
on the right side (Echevarria and Venegas 2015; Kohler
and Lehr 2004; Rodriguez and Mamani 2020), P waka
is distributed on the left side, and P. ventrimaculatus 1s
distributed on both sides of the Marafion River (Kizirian
et al. 2008).
Vicariant topographic features such as the DVMR
introduce genetic barriers between populations on the
two sides of the valley, promoting the diversification
of lineages (Futuyma and Kirkpatrick 2017). The
ornithological literature supports the hypothesis that the
arid valley of the DVMR interrupts gene flow between
populations and promotes allopatric speciation (Hazzi
et al. 2018; Weir 2009; Winger and Bates 2015), but
this hypothesis has not been tested in other biological
groups, and especially in philopatric organisms such as
gymnophthalmid lizards (Doan et al. 2021). Here, based
on an analysis of morphological data and molecular
phylogenetic relationships of four mitochondrial genes
(12S, 16S, cyt-b, and ND4) and one nuclear gene (c-mos)
from specimens collected on both sides of the DVMR,
we evaluated the hypothesis proposed by Kizirian et al.
(2008) that Petracola ventrimaculatus and P. waka are
species complexes, and we describe two new species from
those complexes.
Material and Methods
Data Collection and Morphology
Specimens of the new species were collected in Department
Amazonas, Peru, and are deposited in the Coleccién
Cientifica Pro Fauna Ayacucho (PFAUNA) and the Museo
de Biodiversidad del Pert (MUBI). Specimens were
collected by hand, euthanized, fixed in 10% formalin, and
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
stored in 70% ethanol. Tissue samples were stored in 2 ml
cryogenic tubes filled with 96% ethanol. The terminology
for diagnostics and format description follows Uzzell
(1970), Kizirian (1996), Mamani et al. (2022), and
Mamani and Rodriguez (2022). Measurements were taken
with calipers to the nearest 0.1 mm. Abbreviations for
measurements are as follows: SVL (snout-vent length),
TL (tail length), LAL (length between arm and leg),
LSA (length from the tip of snout to anterior margin of
the insertion of the arm), HL (head length, from the tip of
snout to posterior margin of tympanum), HW (head width,
maximum width of head), HH (head height, maximum
height of head), FR (frontal length), and FN (frontonasal
length). Morphological data of Petracola species were
taken from the literature (Echevarria and Venegas 2015;
Kizirian et al. 2008; Kohler and Lehr 2004; Rodriguez
and Mamani 2020) and the examination of voucher
specimens deposited at the Museo de Historia Natural
de la Universidad Nacional de San Marcos (MUSM),
Lima, Peru; Museo de Biodiversidad del Peru (MUBI),
Cusco, Peru; and Coleccion Cientifica Pro Fauna Silvestre
(PFAUNA), Ayacucho, Peru. The specimens examined are
listed in Appendix I.
DNA Extraction, Amplification, Sequencing, and
Phylogenetic Reconstruction
We extracted DNA from the tissue samples of seven
voucher specimens of Petracola (Table 1) from both sides
of the DVMR. We used standard protocols (Mamani et
al. 2020) to amplify fragments of the small subunit rRNA
(12S), large subunit rRNA (16S), dehydrogenase subunit
4 (ND4), cytochrome b (cyt-b), and oocyte maturation
factor gene (c-mos). The new DNA sequences are
available in GenBank (Appendix 1; https://www.ncbi.nlm.
nih.gov/genbank/). We obtained additional sequences of
congeneric species and representative species of different
gymnophthalmid genera and outgroups (following
Moravec et al. 2018) from GenBank. We excluded
Petracola ventrimaculatus (AY 507894) from our data set
of the gene ND4, because the sample was nested within
Cercosaura genus in a previous exploratory analysis,
suggesting a possible labeling error or contamination. The
final data set contained 137 operational taxonomic units
(OTU) and 2,384 bp of concatenated fragments (458 bp
for 12S, 561 bp for 16S, 345 bp for cyt-b, 639 bp for ND4,
and 381 bp for c-mos) (Table S1).
The genetic sequences were aligned using MUSCLE
software (Edgar 2004) implemented in MEGA-X (Kumar
et al. 2018). We inferred the phylogenetic relationships
using a Maximum Likelihood (ML) approach in IQTREE
Web server (Trifinopoulos et al. 2016). The evolution
models were estimated in ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy
et al. 2017) and were TIM2+F+1+Gé4 for 12S, GTR+F+R4
for 16S, TIM2e+I+Gé4 for cytb, GIR+F+R5 for ND4, and
TPM3+F+G4 for c-mos. Branch supports were estimated
for 10,000 replicates using ultrafast Bootstrap (Hoang
et al. 2018). Following Moravec et al. (2018), we used
Alopoglossus atriventris, Bachia bresslaui, B. dorbignyi,
B. flavescens, Ecpleopus gaudichaudii, Gymnophthalmus
December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 | e328
Mamani et al.
Table 1. Voucher museum specimens of Petracola lizards, mentioning their collection locations and GenBank codes sequences used
in this study. All localities are from Peru.
Species/voucher Locality
Chiliquin, Chachapoyas,
P. amazonensis MUBI 11473
Amazonas
La Jalca, Chachapoyas,
P. shurugojalcapi MUBI 17727 Amazonas
La Jalca, Chachapoyas,
P. shurugojalcapi PFAUNA 430 Amazonas
Bafios del Inca,
P. waka MUBI 2603 ,
Cajamarca, Cajamarca
Bafios del Inca,
P. waka MUBI 2605 ;
Cajamarca, Cajamarca
Type locality, Cajabamba,
P. waka MUBI 2609 ;
Cajamarca
Type locality, Cajabamba,
P. waka MUBI 2611
Cajamarca
leucomystax, Rhachisaurus brachylepis, | Riolama
inopinata, and R. leucosticta as outgroup taxa.
We estimated uncorrected p-distances between species
of Petracola for the 16S gene using MEGA-X (Kumar
et al. 2018). Genetic distances for 16S larger than 3%
separate most species of gymnophthalmid lizards (Torres-
Carvajal et al. 2015).
The electronic version of this article in Portable
Document Format (PDF) will represent a published work
according to the International Commission on Zoological
Nomenclature (ICZ), and hence the new name contained
in the electronic version is effectively published under the
Code from the electronic edition alone. This published
work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been
registered in ZooBank, the online registration system for
the ICZN. The ZooBank LSIDs (Life Science Identifiers)
can be resolved, and the associated information viewed
through any standard web browser by appending the
LSID to the prefix http://zoobank.org/. The LSID for
this publication is: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FB17AF57-
AAE5-4668-8D22-1722DAEF4AAS.
Results
Phylogenetic and Generic
Assignment
Relationships
The ML tree recovered the monophyly of the ingroup
Cercosaurinae (ultrafast bootstrap, UB = 100; Figs. 1
and S1). Our topology recovered the monophyly of all
genera with high support, except Proctoporus (UB =
52). The monophyly of Oreosaurus was not supported,
because O. serranus was recovered as a different lineage
of Oreosaurus, with Cercosaura, “Cercosaura manicata
boliviana,’’ Dendrosauridion, Petracola, Potamites,
Proctoporus, and Wilsonosaura as its closest relatives.
The genus Petracola was recovered with high support
(UB = 100) as sister lineage of Cercosaura, “Cercosaura
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
OR231541
OR231542
OR231543
OR231544
OR231545
OR231546
OR231547
12S 16S ND4 cytb c-mos
OR231652 OR208583 OR198057 OR211561
OR231653 - OR198058 OR211562
OR231654 - OR198059 = OR211563
OR231655 OR208584 OR198060 OR211564
OR231656 OR208585 OR198061 OR211565
OR231657 OR208586 OR198062 -
OR231658 OR208587 OR198063 OR211566
manicata boliviana,’”’ Dendrosauridion, Potamites,
Proctoporus, Selvasaura, and Wilsonosaura (Fig. 1). The
specimens of Petracola from the left side of the DVMR
were monophyletic, and include P. ventrimaculatus and
P. waka, but the node support was low (UB = 83). Three
specimens from the right side of the DVMR, including the
two new species (P. amazonensis and P. shurugojalcapi),
were recovered as sister lineages with high support (UB
= 100) and have high uncorrected p-distances for the 16S
gene ranging from 3.7% to 8.0% (Table 2), suggesting
they might be distinct from the currently recognized taxa.
Additionally, the distance between specimens of P. waka
from the type locality (MUBI 2609, 2611) and those
from Bafios del Inca and Abra Gelic is 6.3-6.6%, which
suggests a hidden cryptic diversity (Table 2).
Finally, our phylogeny and morphological traits such
as presence of imbricate and scale-like papillae on the
tongue, scales of the head without striations or rugosities,
smooth dorsal scales, and absence of prefrontal scales
(Doan and Castoe 2005), support the assignment to the
genus Petracola.
Taxonomy
Petracola amazonensis sp. nov.
urn:Isid:zoobank.org:act:89A5D519-171D-4906-B82B-6C60CB8F9854
Holotype. MUBI 11485, adult female (Figs. 2-4) from
Upa, bridle path to Yurumarca, District of Chiliquin,
Province of Chachapoyas, Department of Amazonas, Peru
(6°0’9.19” S; 77°49’21.08” W; ca. 3,020 m asl), collected
by Juan C. Chaparro on 23 May 2012.
Paratypes. Two specimens: A subadult male (MUBI
11473) and a subadult female (MUBI 11474) from near
the type locality (5°59’40.27” S; 77°48’36.26” W; 3,250
m asl), collected by Juan C. Chaparro and Alexander Pari
on 22 May 2012.
December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 | e328
Two new species of Petracola from Peru
100
Neusticurus
Placosoma
Kataphraktosaurus
‘| Echinosaura
Centrosaura
Riama
Gelanesaurus
Pholidobolus
{ Rheosaurus
Oreosaurus
Oreosaurus serranus
Cercosaura
Potamites
Cercosaura manicata boliviana
Selvasaura
Dendrosauridion
Proctoporus
Wilsonosaura
Petracola waka MUBI 2611
Petracola waka MUBI 2609
Petracola waka MUBI 2605
Petracola waka MUBI 2603
Petracola waka KU212687
Petracola ventrimaculatus KU219838
Petracola ventrimaculatus CORBIDI 9235
Petracola amazonensis MUBI 11473
Petracola shurugojalcapi MUBI 17727
Petracola shurugojalcapi PFAUNA 430
{00
Fig. 1. Phylogenetic relationships of Cercosaurini (log likelihood = -54268.289, ultrafast bootstrap = 10,000) constructed from
the data set of 2,384 nucleotides for mitochondrial genes (12S,
of Petracola and the two new species Petracola amazonensis
bootstraps values.
16S, cyt-b, and ND4) and a nuclear gene (c-mos), showing species
and P. shurugojalcapi. The numbers on the branches are ultrafast
Table 2. Pairwise uncorrected p-distances for 16S rRNA between Petracola species. The asterisk (*) indicates type locality.
1 2
(1) P. ventrimaculatus CORBIDI 9235 -
(2) P. ventrimaculatus KU 219838 0.024 -
(3) P. waka KU 212687 0.063 0.071
(4) P. waka MUBI 2603 0.073 0.091
(5) P. waka MUBI 2605 0.073 0.091
(6) P. waka MUBI 2609* 0.069 0.082
(7) P. waka MUBI 2611* 0.069 0.082
(8) P. shurugojalcapi MUBI 17727 0.058 0.074
(9) P. shurugojalcapi PFAUNA 430 0.058 0.074
(10) P. amazonensis MUBI 11473 0.057 0.072
Etymology. The specific epithet, amazonensis, 1s
an adjective in reference to the type locality in the
Department of Amazonas, northern Peru.
Diagnosis: Petracola amazonensis is diagnosed based on
the following combination of characters: (1) frontonasal
longer than frontal; (2) nasoloreal suture absent; (3) two
supraoculars; (4) one superciliary scale expanded on
dorsal surface of head; (5) two postoculars; (6) palpebral
disc transparent, entire or divided vertically in two; (7)
four supralabials anterior to the posteroventral angle
of the subocular; (8) 3—4 anterior infralabials; (9) four
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
164
3 4 ) 6 it 8 9 10
0.063 -
0.063 0.000 -
0.066 0.031 0.031 -
0.066 0.031 0.031 0.000 -
0.080 0.079 0.079 0.079 0.079 >
0.080 0.079 0.079 0.079 0.079 0.000 -
0.085 0.078 0.078 0.072 0.072 0.037 0.037 -
genials in contact; (10) three rows of pregulars; (11)
dorsal body scales rectangular, smooth, juxtaposed; (12)
25-28 scales around midbody; (13) 31-32 transverse
dorsal rows; (14) 18-19 transverse ventral rows; (15)
17-20 longitudinal dorsal rows; (16) 8—9 longitudinal
ventral rows; (17) a continuous series of small lateral
scales separate dorsals from ventral scales; (18) 2-4
posterior cloacal plate scales; (19) two anterior preanal
plate scales; (20) four femoral pores per hind limb in
males, two in females; (21) preanal pores absent; (22)
7-9 subdigital lamellae on finger IV; 11-14 subdigital
lamellae on toe IV; (23) limbs not overlapping when
December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 | e328
Mamani et al.
adpressed against body; (24) pentadactyl, digits clawed;
and (25) coloration of female in life: dorsum is brown
with numerous dark spots distributed irregularly from tip
of head to tail, flanks are similar to dorsum, the chin
and throat are pale orange with large black spots, venter
mostly orange, with black spots on anterior part of ventral
scales forming longitudinal lines (Fig. 4); coloration of
males in life is unknown; in preservative the dorsum is
similar to coloration in life, and venter changes from
orange to cream (Fig. 2).
Petracola amazonensis can be distinguished from
P. angustisoma and P. pajatensis by lacking a loreal
scale (loreal scale present in P angustisoma and P.
pajatensis);, from P. labioocularis by lacking precloacal
pores and posterior subocular is not elongated downward
(precloacal pores present and posterior subocular is
elongated downward and separates supralabials in P.
labioocularis), from P. waka by having two genials in
contact, first superciliary scale, and venter is orange with
black spots forming transverse bands (three genials in
contact, four continuous superciliary scales, and venter
is cream with some small, black spots in P. waka); from
P. ventrimaculatus by having a maximum SVL in males
of 43.0 mm, dorsum dark brown with some black spots
not forming bands, and first superciliary only (maximum
SVL in females 59.0 mm, dorsum light brown with
continuous black dorsal bands, and 2-3 discontinuous
superciliaries in P. ventrimaculatus).
Description of the holotype. Adult female, snout—
vent length (SVL) 43.0 mm, tail length 42.3 mm
(regenerated); head scales smooth, without striations
or rugosities; rostral scale wider (1.5 mm) than tall
(0.8 mm), in contact with frontonasal, nasals, and first
supralabials; frontonasal longer (2.5 mm) than wide (1.7
mm), longer than frontal scale, widest in the middle, in
contact with rostral, nasal, first superciliary, and frontal;
prefrontal absent; frontal longer that wide, pentagonal,
Fig. 2. Holotype of Petracola amazonensis, female MUBI 11485
(SVL = 43.0 mm, TL = 42.3 mm).
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
in contact with first supraocular and frontoparietals;
frontoparietal paired, polygonal (hexagonal), in contact
with frontal, supraoculars, parietals, and interparietals;:
two supraoculars, in contact with superciliaries,
frontal, frontoparietals, interparietal, and postoculars;
parietals polygonal (irregular heptagon), in contact
with frontoparietals, posterior supraocular, postocular,
interparietal, temporals, supratemporals laterally, and
with postparietals posteriorly; interparietals hexagonal,
in contact with frontoparietals anteriorly, parietals
laterally, and with postparietal posteriorly; two polygonal
postparietals, joined in the middle by a small surface.
Nasal scale entire, longer than high, in contact with
first supralabial; loreal scale absent; left side with first
superciliary, on right side with a posterior rudimentary
posterior superciliary, first superciliaries expand on
dorsal surface of head; two small preoculars; frenocular
trapezoidal in contact with second supralabial; palpebral
disc entire and transparent; three suboculars on right
side and two on left side; two postoculars; temporals
and supratemporals smooth, polygonal; four supralabials
anterior to the posteroventral angle of the suboculars.
Mental wider than long, in contact with the first
infralabial and postmental posteriorly; postmental single,
polygonal (irregular pentagonal), in contact with first and
second infralabials, and first pair of genials; four genials
in contact; three transversal rows of pregular scales, in
the anterior row they are large; five rows of gular scales,
quadrangular and circular. Dorsal scales rectangular with
blunt edges, juxtaposed, smooth, 32 transverse rows; 17
longitudinal dorsal rows at midbody; a continuous series
ip
= ——
Fig. 3. Drawings of lateral, dorsal, and ventral views of the
head of the holotype (MUBI 11485) of Petracola amazonensis.
December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 | e328
Two new species of Petracola from Peru
of small lateral scales; reduced scales at limb insertion
region; 18 transverse ventral rows; eight longitudinal
ventral rows at midbody; anterior and posterior preanal
plate paired; scales on the tail rectangular, subimbricate,
and smooth; ventral scales quadrangular, juxtaposed,
and smooth. Limbs pentadactyl; digits clawed; dorsal
brachial scales polygonal, imbricate, and smooth with
blunt edges; ventral brachial scales small, rounded, and
smooth; dorsal antebrachial scales polygonal, imbricate
and smooth; ventral antebrachial scales rounded,
smooth, smaller than dorsal; dorsal manus scales
polygonal, smooth, imbricate; palmar scales small,
rounded, and domelike; dorsal scales on fingers smooth,
quadrangular, imbricate, two on finger I, three on II, five
on III, five on IV, and four on V; two subdigital lamellae
on finger I, five on finger IT, seven on finger III, seven
on finger IV, five on finger V; scales on anterodorsal
surface of thigh polygonal, smooth, imbricate; scales on
posterior surface of thigh small, rounded, and separated;
scales on ventral surface of thighs polygonal with blunt
edges, smooth, imbricate, polygonal and juxtaposed; two
femoral pores on each thigh; scales on anterior surface
of crus polygonal, smooth, imbricate, decreasing in size
distally; scales on posterodorsal surface of crus smooth,
polygonal, and imbricate; scales on ventral surface
of crus polygonal, enlarged, smooth, and imbricate;
scales on dorsal surface of feet polygonal, smooth, and
imbricate; scales on ventral surface of feet rounded,
small, and domelike; dorsal scale of toes smooth,
imbricate, two on toe I, four on toe II, five on toe III,
six on IV, five on toe V; four subdigital lamellae on toe
I, seven on toe II, nine on toe III, 13 on toe IV, eight on
toe V. Coloration in life was described in diagnosis; in
preservative, dorsum, dorsal surface of head, neck, arms,
and legs brown with irregular, black spots; venter, chin,
neck, arms, and legs gray with black spots, on venter
black spots form transverse bands (Fig. 4).
ae fn es * a . , : os ee
Fig. 4. Holotype in life of Petracola amazonensis from Upa
(MUBI 11485, SVL= 43.0 mm, TL = 42.3 mm, female).
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
Variation. The most notable variation was the number of
infraoculars: adult female with 2-3 (left-right), juvenile
male with 1—2, and juvenile female with 3—3; adult
female with a rudimentary posterior superciliar on the
right side; juvenile male with three anterior infralabials
on the right side and three postparietals; and adult
female with 25 scales around body and 28 on juveniles.
Distribution and ecology. Petracola amazonensis
is only known from the type locality, Upa near
Yurumarca, from 3,020-3,250 m asl (Fig. 5), District
of Chiliquin, Province of Chachapoyas, Department
of Amazonas (Fig. 6). All specimens were found in
grassland during March (rainy season). The specimen
MUBI 11473 was found under rocks, MUBI 11474
inside bromeliads of the genus 7illandsia, and MUBI
11485 walking on grassland near a creek and a
forest. Petracola amazonensis is likely diurnal and
semifossorial. Syntopic Squamata species include
Stenocercus orientalis. Tree vegetation 1s dominated
by Podocarpus (Podocarpaceae), A/nus (Betulaceae),
Weinmannia (Cunnoniaceae), Ceroxylon (Arecaceae)
and Hyeronima (Euphorbiaceae). Dominant species in
the shrub layer include Macrocarpaea (Gentianaceae),
Munnozia (Asteraceae), Chusquea (Poaceae), and Piper
(Piperaceae); and herbs Anthurium (Araceae), Tillandsia
(Bromeliaceae), orchids (Orchidaceae) and Peperomia
(Piperaceae).
Conservation. Petracola amazonensis was found in
a small area in the district of Chiliquin (Fig. 5), and
we suspect it might be endemic to the Department of
Amazonas. The type locality is 2.5—3.0 km from the
Private Conservation Area “Comunal San Pablo -
Catarata Gocta,” and it is very likely that the species 1s
distributed within this conservation area. In general, the
habitat where we conducted our herpetological surveys
was in an acceptable state of conservation in May 2012.
Given the lack of knowledge regarding its geographic
distribution, we recommend that P. amazonensis be
categorized as Data Deficient in the Red List of the
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN
2022).
hi Mae at = Y “a.
Fig. 5. Type locality of Petracola amazonensis, Upa, District of
Chiliquin, Province of Chachapoyas, Department of Amazonas.
December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 | e328
Mamani et al.
81°0'O"W 78°0'O"W 75°0'O"W 72°0'0"W
0°0'0" q 0°0'0"
N
cand
3°0'0"S
6°0'0"S
Brazil
9°0'0"S
Pacific
Ocean
0 62.5125 250
12°0'0"S 12°0'0".
81°0'O"W 78°0'O"W 75°0'O"W 72°0'0"W
Fig. 6. Map showing the type localities of Petracola species: Fig. 7. Holotype of Petracola shurugojalcapi, adult female
Petracola amazonensis (blue cross), P. angustisoma (red PFAUNA 431 (SVL = 51.0 mm, TL = 39.0 mm).
circle), P. labioocularis (light blue triangle), P. pajatensis (green
pentagon), P. shurugojalcapi (yellow star), P. ventrimaculatus
(purple cross), and P. waka (orange diamond).
(2D
iG ey,
ae ae |
Cl
©
eal
eas
aug
\\ ee
l}
ai
eee —
Fig. 9. Holotype in life of Petracola shurugojalcapi from La
Jalca Grande (PFAUNA 431, SVL = 51.0 mm, TL = 39.0 mm,
adult female).
Fig. 8. Drawings of lateral, dorsal, and ventral views of the head
of the holotype (PFAUNA 431) of Petracola shurugojalcapi.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 167 December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 | e328
Two new species of Petracola from Peru
Petracola shurugojalcapi sp. nov.
urn:Isid:zoobank.org:act:2C3D891D-C75F-4B48-8951-F7870CCE4A09
Holotype. PFAUNA 431, adult female (Figs. 7—9) from
Area de Conservacion Privada Llamapampa-La Jalca,
District of Jalca Grande, Province of Chachapoyas,
Department of Amazonas, Peru (6°25’36” S:; 77°45’56”
W; 2,990 m asl), collected by Victor Vargas on 30 May
2013.
Paratypes. Seven specimens: Two adult males (PFAUNA
427, MUBI 17727), subadult male (PFAUNA 432), and
two adult female (PFAUNA 429, MUBI 17726) from
the same place as the holotype. A male (PFAUNA 430)
and female (PFAUNA 433) were collected near the type
locality (6°25’36” S; 77°45’56” W; ca. 2,990 m asl).
Etymology. The specific epithet, shurugojalcapi, treated
as a noun in apposition, is a combination of two local
words: “shurugo” the local name for a gymnophthalmid
lizard and “jalcapi” that means “from Jalca” in the
Quechua language. The specific name was proposed by
the inhabitants of La Jalca Grande.
Diagnosis. Petracola shurugojalcapi is diagnosed
based on the following combination of characters: (1)
frontonasal longer than frontal; (2) nasoloreal suture
absent; (3) two supraoculars; (4) two discontinuous
superciliaries, first expanded onto dorsal surface of
head; (5) two postoculars; (6) palpebral disc transparent,
divided vertically in two; (7) 3-4 supralabials anterior
to the posteroventral angle of the subocular; (8) four
anterior infralabials; (9) four genials in contact; (10) three
rows of pregulars; (11) dorsal body scales rectangular,
smooth, juxtaposed; (12) 29-32 scales around midbody;
(13) 31-33 transverse dorsal rows; (14) 18—21 transverse
ventral rows; (15) 19-23 longitudinal dorsal rows;
(16) eight longitudinal ventral rows; (17) a continuous
series of small lateral scales separating dorsals from
ventrals; (18) 2-4 posterior cloacal plate scales; (19) two
anterior preanal plate scales; (20) 5—6 femoral pores per
hind limb in males, 2—3 in females; (21) preanal pores
absent; (22) 8—9 subdigital lamellae on finger IV; 13-15
subdigital lamellae on toe IV; (23) limbs not overlapping
when adpressed against body; (24) pentadactyl, digits
clawed; (25) coloration of males in life is brown or dark
brown with or without numerous cream spots distributed
irregularly on flanks, and dorsum forming four
discontinuous transversal lines, venter immaculate black
or blackish gray; females with brown dorsum, numerous
and irregular light brown or cream spot on flanks, venter
blackish gray.
Petracola shurugojalcapi can be distinguished from
P. amazonensis by having dorsum brown with irregular
dark spots, venter black with lateral cream spots, and two
separate superciliaries (dorsum brown or dark-brown
with irregular cream spots, venter orange with black spots
forming transversal bands, and only first superciliary
present in P. amazonensis), from P. angustisoma and P.
pajatensis by not having a loreal scale (loreal scale present
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
in P. angustisoma and P. pajatensis), from P. labioocularis
by lacking precloacal pores and by having the posterior
subocular not elongated downward (precloacal pores
present and by having posterior subocular scale elongated
downward and separates supralabials in P. lJabioocularis),
from P. waka by having the palpebral disc divided
vertically, two genial scales in contact, two discontinuous
superciliary scales, venter black (palpebral disc entire,
three genials in contact, four continuous superciliary
scales, venter cream with small black spots in P. waka);
from P. ventrimaculatus by having a maximum SVL in
males of 51.0 mm, dorsum dark brown or black with some
cream spots not forming bands, and venter dark with
lateral cream spots (maximum SVL in males 71.1 mm,
dorsum light brown with continuous black longitudinal
bands, and venter cream with bold black transversal band
in P. ventrimaculatus).
Description of the holotype. Adult female, snout—vent
length (SVL) 51.0 mm, tail length 39.0 mm (regenerated),
head scales smooth, without striations or rugosities;
rostral scale wider (2.0 mm) than tall (0.9 mm), in contact
with frontonasal, nasals, and first supralabials; frontonasal
longer (2.5 mm) than wide (2.1 mm), longer than frontal
scale, widest in the middle part, in contact with rostral,
nasal, first superciliary, and frontal; prefrontal absent;
frontal longer than wide, pentagonal, in contact with
first superciliary, first supraocular, and frontoparietals;
frontoparietal paired, polygonal (hexagonal), in contact
with frontal, supraoculars, parietals, and interparietals;
supraoculars two, in contact with superciliaries, frontal,
frontoparietals, interparietal, and postoculars; parietals
longer than wide, polygonal (irregular heptagon), in
contact with frontoparietals and superior supraocular,
interparietal, temporals, and supratemporals laterally, and
with postparietals posteriorly; interparietals polygonal
(irregularly heptagonal), in contact with frontoparietals
anteriorly, with parietals laterally, and with postparietal
posteriorly; three postparietals, the middle one is smaller
than laterals, polygonal. Nasal scale entire, longer than
high, in contact with first and second supralabials; nasal
suture does not divide the nasal, the right side has upper
and lower suture, but the left side only the lower; loreal
scale absent; two superciliaries, discontinuous, and first
expanded onto dorsal surface of head; two preoculars;
frenocular trapezoidal in contact with second and third
supralabial; palpebral disc transparent and divided in two;
three suboculars; two postoculars; temporals smooth,
polygonal; four supralabials anterior to the posteroventral
angle of suboculars. Mental wider than long, in contact
with first infralabials and postmental posteriorly:
postmental single, polygonal (irregular heptagonal),
in contact with the first and second infralabials, and
the first pair of genials; four genials in contact; three
transversal rows of pregular scales; six gular scale rows,
quadrangular with rounded corners, and smooth. Dorsal
scales rectangular, longer that wide, juxtaposed, smooth,
34 transverse rows; 20 longitudinal dorsal scale rows
at midbody; a continuous series of small lateral scales;
reduced scales at limb insertion region present; 20
December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 | e328
Mamani et al.
Table 3. Morphometric measurements of Petracola amazonensis and P. shurugojalcapi. * broken tail, ** regenerated tail.
P. shurugojalcapi
P. amazonensis
PFAUNA 431 PFAUNA 427 PFAUNA 430 PFAUNA 429 MUBI 17727 MUBI 11485
Holotype Paratype Paratype Paratype Paratype Holotype
Sex Female Male Male Female Male Female
SVL 51.0 48.5 440 A474 50.8 43.0
LAL 26.7 24.5 24.6 26.3 26.2 21.6
LSA 155 19 15 14.8 18.2 14.8
TL 39.0 (**) 65.9 (**) 529 PALF) 324A(F%) 42.3
HL 9.3 10.7 8.9 8.4 10.5 9.3
HW 6.8 8.2 6.9 6.2 8.1 5.6
HH S23 6.3 5.4 5.1 6.1 46
FR 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.4 2 1.4
FN 2.6 De] 2.1 Di 2.6 Di
transverse ventral scale rows; eight longitudinal ventral
scale rows at midbody, lateral scales slightly smaller;
anterior and posterior preanal plate scales paired; scales
on tail rectangular, slightly subimbricate, and smooth;
ventral scales quadrangular, juxtaposed, and smooth.
Limbs pentadactyl; digits clawed; dorsal brachial scales
polygonal, imbricate, and smooth; ventral brachial scales
rounded, separate, and smooth; dorsal antebrachial scales
polygonal, imbricate and smooth; ventral antebrachial
scales rounded, separate, smooth, smaller than dorsal;
dorsal manus scales polygonal, smooth, imbricate;
palmar scales small, rounded, separate, and dome-like;
dorsal scales on fingers smooth, quadrangular, imbricate,
two on finger I, five on II, five on III, five on IV, and four
on V; five subdigital lamellae on finger I, eight on finger
II, nine on finger IT, nine on finger IV, seven on finger V;
scales on anterodorsal surface of thigh polygonal, smooth,
imbricate; scales on posterior surface of thigh small,
rounded, and separated; scales on anteroventral surface
Fig. 10. Type locality of Petracola shurugojalcapi, Area de
Conservacion Privada Llamapampa-La Jalca, District of la Jalca
Grande, Province of Chachapoyas, Department of Amazonas.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
of thigh polygonal, smooth, imbricate and posteroventral
surface of thigh small, polygonal and juxtaposed; two
femoral pores in both thighs; scales on anterior surface
of crus polygonal, smooth, separated, decreasing in size
distally; scales on posterodorsal surface of crus smooth,
polygonal, separated; scales on ventral surface of crus
polygonal, enlarged, smooth, and imbricate; scales on
dorsal surface of toes polygonal, smooth, and imbricate;
scales on ventral surface of toes rounded, small and
domelike; dorsal scale of toes smooth, imbricate, two
on toe I, five on toe I, six on toe III, eight on IV, seven
on V; five subdigital lamellae on toe I, eight on toe I,
11 on toe III, 14 on toe IV, ten on toe V. Coloration in
life, dorsum, dorsal surface of head, neck, arms, and legs
brown; lateral sides of dorsum and tail with many small
and irregular, cream spots; venter, ventral surface of
head, neck, arms, and legs dark gray, flanks have intense
cream spots. Coloration in preservative as in life, but less
intense.
Variation. Adult male MUBI 17727 has two suboculars
on the right side, males have 9-12 temporal scales and
females 6-9, males are more robust than females;n
paratype PFAUNA 432, the nasal suture scale does not
divide the nasal, but connects inferiorly to the nostril;
in MUBI 17727, the nasal suture connects inferiorly
and superiorly to the nostril; and the nasal sutures of the
other paratypes do not connect with the nostril and extend
posteriorly to middle part of the nostril. Morphometric
characters vary by sex and are shown in Table 3.
Distribution and ecology. Proctopous shurugojalcapi is
known only from the type locality, Area de Conservacion
Privada Llamapampa-La Jalca, from 2,940—2,990 m asl
(Fig. 10), District of La Jalca, Province of Chachapoyas,
Department of Amazonas (Fig. 6). All specimens
(eight) were found during diurnal surveys from 10:00 to
14:00 h. The new species was found in sympatry with
December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 | e328
Two new species of Petracola from Peru
Stenocercus sp., Liophis sp., and frogs Gastrotheca
monticola, Pristimantis schultei, P. cf. corrugatus, P. sp.,
and Centrolene sp. The habitat of P. shurugojalcapi is
dominated by trees of the genera Weinmannia, Clusia, and
Symplocos, and shrubs of the family Melastomataceae.
Conservation. Petracola shurugojalcapi was found
during field studies in support of the establishment of
the Area de Conservacion Privada Llamapampa-La
Jalca. The Conservation Area was established on 17
April 2015, protecting more than 26,000 ha of montane
forest and wet grasslands. However, this important
area 1S not exempt from threats such as deforestation
and land use changes associated with local subsistence
farming, ranching, and forest fires. Although available
data indicate that this species could have a restricted
distribution, adjacent areas remain unexplored and could
host additional populations. Therefore, we recommend
that P. shurugojalcapi be categorized as Data Deficient in
the Red List of the International Union for Conservation
of Nature (IUCN 2022).
Discussion
Our ML phylogenetic analysis recovered the monophyly
of Petracola with respect to a clade including Cercosaura,
Cercosaura manicata_ boliviana, Dendrosauridion,
Proctoporus, Potamites, and Wilsonosaura, a result
that is congruent with previous studies (Moravec et al.
2018; Rojas-Runjaic et al. 2021; Mamani et al. 2022). All
generic lineages were recovered with high support, except
Proctoporus and Pholidobolus. The genus Proctoporus
has not been conclusively defined, with some studies
supporting its monophyly (e.g., Goicoechea et al. 2012;
Mamani et al. 2022: Sanchéz-Pacheco et al. 2018; this
study), while others do not (e.g., Rojas-Runyaic et al.
2021; Torres-Carvayal et al. 2016; Vasquez-Restrepo et al.
2020). In fact, the topologies of phylogenetic trees differ
depending on the methods of phylogenetic reconstruction
(Bayesian inference and Maximum Likelihood; Mamani
et al. 2022; Moravec et al. 2018). Sanchéz-Pacheco et al.
(2018) showed that Proctoporus is monophyletic when
using Maximum Parsimony approximation with either the
combined data set of DNA + morphology or the dataset of
DNA only. Sanchéz-Pacheco et al. (2018) also recovered
the monophyly of Oreosaurus (including O. serranus).
However, recent studies showed that Oreosaurus 1s not
monophyletic (e.g., Mamani et al. 2022; Rojas-Runjaic
et al. 2021). Despite conflicting results, progress from
studies using molecular phylogenetic analyses have
improved tree topologies overall.
Our phylogenetic analysis recovered multiple
diagnosable lineages within Petracola, including
P. amazonensis, P. shurugojalcapi (UB=100), P.
ventrimaculatus (UB=100), and the P waka species
complex (UB=100). This preliminary result shows that
the species from the right side of the DVMR are an
independent lineage with respect from those of the left side
(P. ventrimaculatus and P. waka). However, our sampling
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
is considered as only preliminary (including only two
species) and should be taken with caution. Finally, the
phylogenetic position of two species that inhabit the right
side of the DVMR, P. angustisoma and P. pajatensis, 1s
unknown. If our hypothesis is correct, P. angustisoma
and P. pajatensis should form a monophyletic lineage
together with P. amazonensis and P. shurugojalcapi.
Despite the low number of localities sampled, our
results supported the hypothesis proposed by Kizirian
et al. (2008) that P ventrimaculatus and P. waka are
cryptic species complexes. Likewise, the populations of
P. waka and P. ventrimaculatus are independent lineages
at the species level with high genetic distance and should
be recognized as such (Fig. 1, Table 2). Furthermore,
we describe two of these species collected on the right
side of the DVMR, which increases the diversity of the
genus to seven species. The first available sequence
of P waka in GenBank (named as Proctoporus sp
(KU212687) by Castoe et al. 2004) was collected from
Abra Gelic, a remote locality (80 km) north of the type
locality (Cajabamba), and we added samples from the
Cajabamba and Bafios del Inca 70 km northwest of
the type locality. The molecular evidence suggests that
specimens from both Abra Gelic and Bafios del Inca
belong to undescribed species that will be treated in a
separate study. The landscape between these locations 1s
heterogeneous and includes the Huamachuquino River,
which is characterized by having arid vegetation (pers.
obs.) that could promote vicariance.
Finally, our results suggest that the populations of
Petracola onthe right side of the DVMR are evolutionarily
independent from the populations on the left side. These
results are similar to those proposed for birds (Hazzi et al.
2018; Weir 2009; Winger and Bates 2015), supporting the
hypothesis that the DVMR promotes allopatric speciation
of Andean lineages. However, more extensive sampling
is needed to determine whether all Petracola species on
the right side are monophyletic, and to uncover the true
diversity of this rarely studied group.
Acknowledgments. We thank Cesar Aguilar (MUSM),
Pablo Venegas (CORBIDI), the staff of MUBI, and
Evaristo Lopez (MUSA) for allowing access to their
herpetological collections; and to Tiffany M. Doan and
David Kizirian for reviewing our manuscript. JCC is
grateful to Alexander Pari, who shared fieldwork and
contributed with some lizard collections; JCC field work
was funded by Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Internationale
Zusammenarbeit (GIZ). The specimen collection and
DNA extraction was authorized by the Servicio Nacional
Forestal y de Fauna Silvestre (SERFOR), permits RDG
N° 369-2019-MINAGRI-SERFOR-DGGSPFFS, RDG
N° 026-2018-MINAGRI-DGGSPFFS, and RDG N°
024-2017-SERFOR/DGGSPFFS. In addition, we thank
the NGO Nature and Culture International for its support
in the field studies and the Rural Community of Jalca
Grande for taking part in the conservation of the forests
of the Area de Conservacion Privada Llamapampa-La
Jalca.
December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 | e328
Mamani et al.
Literature Cited
Boulenger GA. 1900. Descriptions of new batrachians
and reptiles collected by Mr. P.O. Simons in Peru.
Annals Magazine of Natural History 6(7): 181-186.
Castoe TA, Doan TM, Parkinson CL. 2004. Data
partitions and complex models in _ Bayesian
analysis: the phylogeny of gymnophthalmid lizards.
Systematic Biology 53(3): 448-469.
Doan TM, Castoe TA. 2005. Phylogenetic taxonomy of
the Cercosaurini (Squamata: Gymnophthalmidae),
with new genera for species of Neusticurus and
Proctoporus. Zoological Journal of the Linnean
Society 143(3): 405-416.
Doan TM, Sheffer SA, Warmington NR, Evans
EE. 2021. Population biology of the unusual
thermoconforming lizards of the Andes Mountains
of Peru (Squamata: Gymnophthalmidae). Austral
Ecology 46: 1,039-1,051.
Echevarria LY, Venegas PJ. 2015. Anew elusive species
of Petracola (Squamata: Gymnophthalmidae) from
the Utcubamba basin in the Andes of northern Peru.
Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 9(1) [Special
Section]: 26—33 (e107).
Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence
alignment with high accuracy and high throughput.
Nucleic Acids Research 32(5): 1,792—1,797.
Futuyma DJ, Kirkpatrick M. 2017. Evolution. Sinauer
Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA. 599
p.
Goicoechea N, Padial JM, Chaparro JC, Castroviejo-
Fisher S, De la Riva I. 2012. Molecular phylo-
genetics, species diversity, and biogeography of the
Andean lizards of the genus Proctoporus (Squamata:
Gymnophthalmidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and
Evolution 65(3): 953-964.
Hazzi NA, Moreno JS, Ortiz-Movliav C, Palacio
RD. 2018. Biogeographic regions and events of
isolation and diversification of the endemic biota
of the tropical Andes. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
115(31): 7,985-7,990.
Hoang DT, Chernomor O, Von Haeseler A, Minh BQ,
Vinh LS. 2018. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast
bootstrap approximation. Molecular Biology and
Evolution 35(2): 518-522.
IUCN. 2022. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.
Available: https://www.iucnredlist.org. [Accessed:
30 January 2023].
Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, Von
Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. 2017. ModelFinder: fast
model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates.
Nature Methods 14(6): 587-589.
Kizirian D, Bayefsky-Anand S, Eriksson A, Le M,
Donnelly MA. 2008. A new Petracola and re-
description of P ventrimaculatus (Squamata:
Gymnophthalmidae). Zootaxa 1700(1): 53-62.
Kizirian DA. 1996. Areview of Ecuadorian Proctoporus
(Squamata: Gymnophthalmidae) with descriptions
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
of nine new species. Herpetological Monographs
10: 85-155.
Kohler G, Lehr E. 2004. Comments on Euspondylus
and Proctoporus (Squamata: Gymnophthalmidae)
from Peru, with the description of three new species
and a key to the Peruvian species. Herpetologica
60(4): 501-518.
Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. 2018.
MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis
across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and
Evolution 35(6): 1,547-—1,549.
Mamani L, Cruz R, Mallqui S, Catenazzi A. 2022.
Molecular phylogenetics and comparative
examination of voucher specimens reveal two new
species of gymnophthalmid lizards (Squamata,
Gymnophthalmidae) from the Peruvian Andes, with
comments on Proctoporus guentheri (Boettger,
1891). Diversity 14(3): 215.
Mamani L, Rodriguez LO. 2022. A new species of
Andean lizard, Proctoporus (Gymnophthalmidae:
Cercosaurinae), from the highland of Parque
Nacional Otishi in Peru. Zootaxa 5213(1): 75-85.
Mamani L, Chaparro JC, Correa C, Alarcon C,
Salas CY, Catenazzi A. 2020. A new species
of Andean gymnophthalmid lizard (Squamata:
Gymnophthalmidae) from the Peruvian Andes, and
resolution of some taxonomic problems. Diversity
12(9): 361.
Moravec J, Smid J, Stundl J, LehrE. 2018. Systematics of
neotropical microtetid lizards (Gymnophthalmidae,
Cercosaurinae), with the description of a new genus
and species from the Andean montane forests.
ZooKeys 774: 105-139.
Rodriguez LO, Mamani L. 2020. A new species of
Petracola (Squamata: Gymnophthalmidae) from
Rio Abiseo National Park, San Martin, Peru.
Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 14(1) [General
Section]: 140-146 (e227).
Rojas-Runjaic FJM, Barrio-Amordés CL, Sefiaris JC,
De la Riva I, Castroviejo-Fisher S. 2021. Discovery
of an additional piece of the large gymnophthalmid
puzzle: a new genus and species of stream
spiny lizard (Squamata: Gymnophthalmidae:
Cercosaurinae) from the western Guiana Shield in
Venezuela. Zootaxa 4950(2): 296-320.
Sanchez-Pacheco SJ, Torres-Carvajal O, Aguirre-
Pefiafiel V, Nunes PMS, Verrastro L, Rivas GA,
Rodrigues MT, Grant T, Murphy RW. 2018. Phylo-
geny of Riama (Squamata: Gymnophthalmidae),
impact of phenotypic evidence on molecular
datasets, and the origin of the Sierra Nevada de
Santa Marta endemic fauna. Cladistics 34: 260-291.
Torres-Carvajal O, Lobos SE, Venegas PJ, Chavez G,
Aguirre-Pefiafiel V, Zurita D, Echevarria LY. 2016.
Phylogeny and biogeography of the most diverse
clade of South American gymnophthalmid lizards
(Squamata, Gymnophthalmidae, Cercosaurinae).
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 99: 63-75.
Trifinopoulos J, Nguyen LT, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ.
December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 | e328
Two new species of Petracola from Peru
2016. W-IQ-TREE: a fast online phylogenetic tool for
maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Research
44(W1): W232—-W235.
Uzzell TM. 1970. Teiid lizards of the genus Proctoporus
from Bolivia and Peru. Postilla 142: 1-39.
Vasquez-Restrepo JD, Ibafiez R, Sanchez-Pacheco SJ,
Daza JM. 2020. Phylogeny, taxonomy, and distribution
of the Neotropical lizard genus Echinosaura
(Squamata: Gymnophthalmidae), with the recognition
of two new genera in Cercosaurinae. Zoological
Journal of the Linnean Society 189(1): 287-314.
Weir JT. 2009. Implications of genetic differentiation
in neotropical montane forest birds. Annals of the
Missouri Botanical Garden 96(3): 410-433.
Winger BM, Bates JM. 2015. The tempo of trait
divergence in geographic isolation: avian speciation
across the Marafion Valley of Peru. Evolution 69(3):
772-787.
Luis Mamani is a Peruvian biologist who obtained his M.Sc. degree from the Universidad de
Concepcion (UdeC) in Chile. Currently, he 1s a Ph.D. student working on the ecology, systematics,
taxonomy, and evolution of gymnophthalmid lizards in the Cordillera de los Andes.
Victor J. Vargas Garcia is a Biologist and Master’s student in Applied Ecology. He has more than
10 years of experience tn the study of amphibians and reptiles in the Peruvian Andes, participating
and collaborating with various expeditions and scientific publications. Currently, he works on
several research and conservation projects on threatened amphibians. In addition, he is a researcher
associated in the Coleccion Cientifica Pro Fauna Silvestre de Ayacucho, a member of the Asociacion
Herpetologica del Peru, and provides support to the IUCN Amphibian Specialist Group. He currently
works at the Servicio Nacional Forestal y de Fauna Silvestre (SERFOR) tn Peru.
Juan C. Chaparro is a Peruvian Biologist with extensive experience in studying the fauna of all
the traditional geographic regions of Peru. Juan graduated in Biological Sciences from Universidad
Nacional Pedro Ruiz Gallo, Lambayeque, Peru, and recetved a Master’s degree in Biodiversity
in Tropical Areas and Conservation in 2013 from an institutional consortium of the International
University of Menendez Pelayo (UIMP-Spain), Universidad Tecnolégica Indoamérica (UTIEcuador),
and Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC-Spain). He is currently the Director and
Curator of the Herpetological Collection of the Museo de Biodiversidad del Peru (MUBI), and he
works as a consultant in environmental studies. Juan has authored or co-authored 58 peer reviewed
scientific papers, notes, book chapters, and books on fauna, especially in herpetology and arachnology,
on topics such as taxonomy, biodiversity, systematics, phylogeny, conservation, and biogeography in
South America. He is interested in those topics, as well as life history, distributional patterns, and
evolution using amphibians and reptiles as biological models.
Alessandro Catenazzi is Associate Professor at Florida International University in Miami, USA.
with CORBIDI.
Amphib. Reptile Conserv.
He works on the systematics and conservation of Neotropical amphibians and reptiles, and the
ecological dimensions of biodiversity. For his first line of research, he works primarily in the Andes
and the Amazon. Alessandro collaborates with colleagues in museums and other research institutions
in describing new species and developing phylogenies of amphibians and reptiles from the mega-
diverse eastern slopes of the Andes. A major theme of his current research is exploring the effects of
fungal diseases on the ecology of amphibians, a group that is experiencing staggering biodiversity
losses worldwide. After documenting the collapse of a species-rich amphibian assemblage, he 1s
interested in developing strategies to mitigate the impact of the fungal disease chytridiomycosis on
the surviving species. Alessandro is an Amphibian Red List Authority and an Associated Researcher
December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 | e328
Mamani et al.
im 100 Neusticurus_bicarinatus MRT _S6B462
Neusticurus_rudis_ MRT_526008
Placosome_cordylinum LE 1006
Kataphraktoseurus_ungerherilton MHNLS._ 1960
Pues Fchinasaura brachyceptela OCAZ_10824
Echinsaura_horrida OCAZ BEGG
100
100 Echinaseura_keyi_OCAZ_8074
99 Echinosaura_orcesi OCAZ 6299
rt = Extimsawre_palreri_MHUARIZGTI
q7 Echinosaura_centralis MHUARI2387
Echinosaura_panarrensis_CHB48?
in ‘00 Ancinasaura_afraria RH
Andingsaura_leevis_WEI330
Andinosaura_vieta_ OCAZI0456
‘00 _ Andinosaura_aurea_OCA7 860
Andinosaura_vespertina_OCAZ10306
ag 8 100 k Andinosaura_kiziriani_ODAZSG67
in 4 Andmosarra_crypta OCAZIO455
Andinasaura_ocuata_OCAZIO4I0
Andinosaura_hyposticta_OHMECNI 360
Centrosaura_epoderra_ MT R3S4E6
Riare_anatoloras_OCAZS169
Riarre_raneyi_OCAZ9034
Riare_coloreromen_OCA78753
Riare_sinotera_KU_217207
Riara_cashceensis OCA2 10754
Riarre_lebionis OCAZI0412
Riare_yurborum OCAZ10822
Riare_meleagris_ ODAZSB41
Riare_stigratorel_ODA27374
Riare_unicelor OCAZ 9662
Riare_calurbiana_ICNIIZ98
Riarme_balneator_ OCAZ_ 11093
Riarre_orvesi_OCAZ9035
Riare_striata MARS33
Gelanesaurus_cochranae ODA? 5587
Gelanesaurus flavoguiaris OCA2_4bll
Anada_ocalata_ SMPBOD95
Aredia petersi OCAZ_50B8
Anada_rhorbiera OCAT_G873
fusponchlus_excelsum CORBIOL 14965
Macrophalidus. amectens OCAZ_ {1121
Macropholicus huencabarrbee CORGIDI_10493
Phalidohous.afiris OCAZ_94l
Phalidobolus_mentium OCAZ0S6
Pholidobolus_prefrontais OCA2 9908
Pholidobolus_dicrus OCAZ 5304
Pholidobolus vertebralis OCA2 688
Pholidcbolus_mecbrydei_OCAZ_9932
Pholidobolus_tillis_ OCA2_SDO0
Pholidobolus_ulisesi_JCM_ 310
Pholidobolus_sp.|_JEM_239
Rheosdurus_sucerostrum ROM 22892
Rheosaurus_sulcarastrum ROM43B05
Oreosaurus_achlyens ENSHOIO
Oreasaurus_shrevei_UWZM2U0I1.7
Orensaurus_mediarrridi_IRSNB_2674
Orecseurus_serranus_JJSS4B
100 Ceronsaura_arguus_MPEGZISB0
Cereosaura_argulus NMPEV_ 72184
Cereasaura_oshaughnessyi_LSUMZ_HI2581
Cercasaura_oshaughnessyi_NMPEV_71/60_1
Cercosaura_parkeri_LEIS60
Cercosaura_schreibersii LG 427
Cercosaura_bassleri_CORBIDI_15187
Cercosaura_ocallata MRT 977406
Cercosaura_eigenmenni_ NMPGV_ 73112
Cercosaura_eigenrann_ MPEGZI590
Cereosaura_doaee CORBI! G50
Cercnseura_pacha_MUBI 14518
Cereasaura_renicate CORBIDI 8837
Cercosaura_menicata OCA? 9793
Cercosaura_anomela MUBL 13626
Potamites_ecrlegpus NNPEV 73186 |
Potarites. eepleopus CORBIDL 14382
Potarites ecolenais OCAZ_ 4599
Potarites.erythrocufaris CORBIDI 15153
Potamites_juruazensis_ CORBIDI_15579
Pctarites, rentarioola CORGID| 10791
Potarites. strangdatus OCAZ_ 6133
Potarrites_trachodus_CORBIDI_15489
Cercosaura_menicata_boliviana_ CORBIOI
Sdvasaura_brava_ MUSM_32718
Selvasaura_evasa_ CORBIDI_ISI7
Selvasaura_almendarizae OCAZ 12798
Oendrosauridion_yanesha_MUSM_25345
Proctoporus_bdivianus MNCN_ 8990
Proctoporus_Cal_MHNC5322
ag Proctoporus_carebaya, MHNC5428
100 Proctoporus_kiziriani_CORBIDI_14710
547 Proctoporus_iridescens MHNCS399
a Proctaporus_lacertus_UTA_R-51487
47
a7
+
= Proctoporus xestus MNCN 2425
aod Proctoporus_chasqui_MUSM_3Il72
| ig Proctoporus_spinalis MUSM_SIIBZ
14 Proctoporus_spinalis CORBIOL 7246
Proctoporus_sp._|_ CORIO!
89 | 42 Proctoporus oreades CORBIDL 7217
54 | 5g Proctoporus_pachyurus_CORBIDI_N8!!
49 Poctoporus_sp._S_MHNC&E89
too} [oa Proctoporus.ratm_MHNCII439
Proctoporus_sp._MHNC4599
Proctoporus_sucullucu_MNCN44478
98 - — Proctnnorus_Ca?_AMNH_R-IS1695
in0 Proctoporus quentheri, MUBI_|O278
Procteporus_quentheri_CORBID|_15558
‘on Proctaporus_sp._3_CORBIDI
Proctoporus_sp._4_MLUSM
80 Practaporus_katerynae_MUBI 10482
a mo Proctoparus_optimus. MUBI 2915
— Proctoporus_unsaacae_UTA_R-51488
Proctonorus, sa? CORAIDI
Wiisonasaura_josyi_CORBIDI 13634
Wilsonasaura_jasyi_MUSM_3l188
(QO) Petracola_weka WUBI 26]
(00 Petracola_woka MUBI 2609
100 (00) Petraccla. waka MUBL 2B05
ed Petracala_weka MUBI_2603
Petracola. weka_KU2|2687
100 100 Petracola_ventrimaculatus KU2ISB38
Petraoola_ventrimacuatus CORBIDI_ 9235
{00 Petracola_amezonensis MUBI_I1473
100 Petracda_shurugejalcapi_MUBL 17727
Petracola_shuruggjaleap_PFAUNA 430
1 ‘Alopoglsssus_atriventris MPEG 78120
al Feolengus gaudichaud_ LG. [258
i Riolara_inopinata_IRSN_2680
________________ glare leucosticta_ IRSNBIBIS2
‘00 100 Bechia darby MRT_S77273
Bachia_flavescens LSUMZ_HI2977
Bachia_bresslaui_MRT_SIGBB3
2B Gyrmophthedlmus_leuconystax_MRT_S4B613
Rhachisaurus_brachylenis MRT_8B7336
100
ol
Fig. S1. Phylogenetic relationships of Cercosaurini (log likelihood = -54268.289, ultrafast bootstrap = 10,000) constructed from the
data set of 2,384 nucleotides for mitochondrial genes (12S, 16S, cyt-b, and ND4) and a nuclear gene (c-mos).
Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 173 December 2023 | Volume 17 | Number 1 | e328