HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Ernst Mayr Library
of the Museum of
Comparative Zoology
May
°3 2®
Volume 10 • 2004
Editor
Er-Mi Zhao
Chengdu Institute of Biology, Academia Sinica, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Associate Editors
Raul E. Diaz
Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of
California, Berkeley, California, USA
J. Robert Macey
Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, USA
Theodore J. Papenfuss
Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of
California, Berkeley, California, USA
James F. Parham
Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, USA;
Museum of Paleontology, University of California,
Berkeley, California, USA
Editorial Board
Robert F. Inger
Field Museum, Chicago, Illinois, USA
kraig Adler
Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
Natalia B. Ananjeva
Zoological Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia
Steven C. Anderson
University of the Pacific, Stockton, California, USA
Aaron Bauer
Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania, USA
Christopher Bell
University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA
Leo Borkin
Zoological Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia
Bihui Chen
Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui, China
l-Jiunn Cheng
Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University,
Keelung, Taiwan, China
Ilya Darevsky
Zoological Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia
Indraneil Das
Madras Crocodile Bank, Vadanemmeli Perur, Madras, India
William E. Duellman
University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
Hajime Fukada
Sennyuji Sannaicho, Higashiyamaku, Kyoto, Japan
Carl Gans
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Michigan, USA
Xiang Ji
Hangzhou Normal College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Pi-peng Id
Yantai Normal College, Yantai, Shandong, China
Robert W. Murphy
Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Ontario. Canada
Goren Nilson
University of Goteborg, Goteborg. Sweden
Nikolai Orlov
Zoological Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia
Hidetoshi Ota
Department of Biology, University of the Ryukyus, Nishihara,
Okinawa, Japan
Soheila Shafii
University of Shahid Bahonar, Kerman, Iran
Hai-tao Shi
Hainan Normal University, Haikou. Hainan, China
Xiu-ling Wang
Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi. Xinjiang, China
Yue-zhao Wang
Chengdu Institute of Biology. Academia Sinica, Chengdu. Sichuan.
China
Yehudah Werner
Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
ken-tang Zhao
Suzhou Railway Teacher's College, Suzhou, Jiangsu. China
Asiatic Herpetological Research is published by the Asiatic Herpetological Research Society (AHRS) and the Chinese Society'
for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles (SCSSAR) at the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California. The editors
encourage authors from all countries to submit articles concerning, but not limited to, Asian herpetology. All correspondence with-
in China should be sent to Ermi Zhao, Editor, Chengdu Institute of Biology, P.O. Box 416. Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Authors should consult Guidelines for Manuscript Preparation and Submission at the end of this issue. Subscriptions and
Membership Asiatic Herpetological Research is published by the Asiatic Herpetological Research Society (AHRS) and the
Chinese Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles (CSSAR). Volume 1 1 will be published in China and distributed by the
Chengdu Institute of Biology, P. O. Box 416, Chengdu 610041, China. Subscriptions and memberships are $30 per year ($5*0 for
libraries). For postage outside of China, please add $5 per issue for surface mail or $10 per issue for airmail. For "subscriptions
outside of China, checks or money orders payable in US currency should be sent to: Bibliomania, P.O. Box 58355. Salt Lake City'.
UT 84158-0355 USA. Phone/Fax 801-562-2660. Payment can be made by Credit Card (Visa. MasterCard. Discover, or American
Express) through the Bibliomania web site, which has a secure server for credit cards (http://www.herplit.com).
Asiatic Herpetological Research Volume 10 succeeds Volume 9 (2001), Volume 8 (published in 1999), Vol. 7 (1997), Vol.6 (1995), Vol.5 (1993),
Vol. 4 (1992), Vol. 3 (1990), and Chinese Herpetological Research Vol. 2, which was published at the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. 1988-1989.
as the journal for the Chinese Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. Volume 2 succceeded Chinese Herpetological Research 1987.
published for the Chengdu Institute of Biology by the Chongqing Branch Scientific and Technological Literature Press, Chongqing, Sichuan.
China. Acta Herpetologica Sinica ceased publication in June, 1988.
Cover: The cover image is of Gonocephalus chamaeleontinus from Pulau Tioman, Pahang, West Malaysia. Photo by L. Lee Grismer.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, pp. 1-7
A New Species of Dibamuc (Squamata: Dibamidae) from West Malaysia
Raijl E. Diaz1’2’*, Ming Tzi Leong3, L. Lee Grismer1, and Norsham S. Yaakob4
MCZ
i 1 IRRAF
Department of Biology, La Sierra University, Riverside, CA 925/5-8247, USA
~ Museum of Vertebrate Zoology’, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94 720, USA
* Corresponding author E-mail: rauldiaz1 a herkeley.edu
Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge,
ir. \ / CT w ?C
Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore
4 Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong, 52109 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Abstract. - A new lizard of the genus Dibamus is described from Pulau Tioman and Pulau Tulai, Pahang, West
Malaysia. This species most closely resembles D. novaeguineae, D. kondaoensis, D. leucurus and D. montanus , but
differs from all congeneric species in exhibiting the following combination of characters: postoculars 1, scales bor-
dering first infralabial 4, SVL 123 mm, 25-26 midbody scale rows, frontonasal and rostral sutures complete, and the
presence of slightly posteriorly notched cycloid body scales as an adult.
Key words. - Dibamus, Dibamus tiomanensis , new species, Dibamidae, Pulau Tioman, West Malaysia.
Introduction
The genus Dibamus presently contains 18 species (see
Greer, 1985; Darevsky, 1992; Das, 1996; Honda et al.,
1997; Ineich, 1999; Honda et al., 2001; Das and Lim,
2003; Das and Yaakob, 2003), a two-fold difference
from the detailed review of the group by Greer (1985).
Species of the genus Dibamus collectively range
throughout southeast Asia, from southern China and the
Philippines through Indonesia. Dibamus alfredi was
described by Taylor (1962) from Thailand. D. alfredi
were later found on the island of Nias, off the west coast
of Sumatra (Greer, 1985) and from Danum Valley in
Sabah State, Borneo (Tan, 1993; Das and Yaakob, 2003).
A large gap was then left between Thailand and Borneo.
Lim and Lim (1999) reported D. cf. alfredi from Pulau
Tioman. Upon examination of their specimen, one from
Pulau Tioman, and another from P. Tulai, we conclude
that these specimens constitute a new species described
herein. Pulau Tioman lies between longitudes 104° 7' to
104° 15' E and latitudes 2° 44' to 2° 54' N (Bullock and
Medway, 1966). Finding another endemic population on
this island provides another reason for its conservation
as well as further studying its rich herpetofauna.
Material and Methods
Single females from both Pulau Tulai and Pulau Tioman
were collected, fixed in 10% formalin, and preserved in
70% ethanol. Both specimens were deposited in the
Zoological Reference Collection (ZRC) at the Rattles
Museum of Biodiversity Research. Sliding calipers were
used for all length measurements. Terminology used fol-
lows Greer (1985) and Honda et al. (1997). Individuals
were sexed externally under a dissecting microscope:
males were identified by having two small, flap-like
limbs (one on each side of the vent) (Dumeril and
Bibron, 1839).
Taxonomy
Dibamus tiomanensis , new species
Figs. 1, 2
Holotype. - ZRC. 2. 34 10, adult male collected at
Kampung Paya, Pulau Tioman, Pahang, West Malaysia
(Fig. 2) on 16 September 1995.
Paratypes. - Adult female (ZRC 2.5092) collected along
the trail to Bukit Bakau, Pulau Tulai, West Malaysia
(Fig. 2) collected 14 July 2001. Juvenile female
(ZRC. 2. 5260) collected along the Tekek-Juara Cross
Island Trail, Pulau Tioman, West Malaysia collected 1 1
July 2001.
Diagnosis. - Dibamus tiomanensis differs from all other
species of Dibamus in having cycloid scales which are
slightly notched posteriorly as an adult and flat cycloid
light brown dorsal scales with cream borders as a juve-
nile. It also differs from other Dibamus in having the fol-
lowing combination of characters: rostral sutures incom-
plete; nasal and labial sutures complete; scales bordering
posterior edge of first infralabial 4; postocular 1; trans-
verse scale rows just posterior to head 29, at midbody
25, proximally anterior to vent 21; subcaudals 45; snout
blunt in lateral profile (Fig. 1; Table 1); presacral verte-
brae 124; postsacral vertebrae 23 (Table 3).
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 2
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Figure 1 . Photograph of Dibamus tiomanensis, new species, on forest leaf litter.
Description of holotype. - Snout-vent length 92.5 mm;
tail length 13.1 mm; midbody diameter 2.5 mm. Snout
bluntly rounded; nostril lateral; rostral pad with large
number of evenly distributed sensory papillae; rostral
sutures incomplete; nasal sutures complete from nostril
Figure 2. Lateral (A), dorsal (B), and ventral (C) view of
head of Dibamus tiomanensis , new species, (f: frontal,
fn: frontonasal, ip: interparietal, if: first infralabial, I: labial
suture, m: mental, n: nasal suture, o: ocular, po: postoc-
ular, si: supralabial)
to ocular; labial sutures complete from anterior part of
nasal suture to mouth; frontonasal six times wider than
long; frontal approximately 1.05 times wider than fron-
tonasal; interparietal bordered posteriorly by four slight-
ly smaller nuchal scales; postocular one; supralabial
one; scales bordering posteromedial edge of first infral-
abaial four; ear opening absent; eyes dimly visible
through ocular; body scales notched posteriorly; trans-
verse scale rows just posterior to head 23, at midbody
25, at just anterior to vent 23; subcaudals 50; tip of tail
blunt, not terminating in a spine; hind limb length 2.6
mm.
Description of paratypes. - The paratypes (both
females) are similar to the holotype in all aspects except
the following: transverse scale rows posterior to head
29, transverse scale rows anterior to vent 2 1 and 22, and
subcaudals 45 and 48.
Variation. - Paratype ZRC.2.5260 is the only juvenile.
It shows a possible ontogenetic change in scale mor-
phology. Juveniles have cycloid, flat, and light brown-
cream bordered scales. Adults have posteriorly notched
brown scales.
Color in life. - Adults have a brown ground color both
dorsally and ventrally, except on the snout and jaws
which are a lighter shade of brown. Juveniles have a
cream-colored snout and jaws which contrast well with
the darker spotted sensory papillae and body scales
which are light-brown bordered with cream. Manthey
and Grossman (1997:205) present a color photograph of
the holotype.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 3
Table 1. Comparison of several scale characters and measurements within Dibamus. The size of the frontal is meas-
uied relative to the frontonasal and the interparietal relative to the surrounding anterior body scales. Sample sizes for
postoculars and scales on posterior edge of infralabials are given in parentheses. Entries for midbody scale rows and
subcaudal scales are as follows from top to bottom: range, mean, and sample size (modified from Greer, 1985). (*= 1
& 3 refer to 1 scale present on the left infralabial and 3 on right; **=tail regenerated; *** = text in Das and Yaakob (2003)
mentions 3 scales bordering the infralabials in diagnosis, whereas 4 scales are mentioned in description of holotype).
Vol. 10, p. 4
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Table 1. Continued.
Figure 3. Map of Southeast Asia showing the distribution
of known Dibamus tiomanensis specimens. (1) Trail to
Bukit, Pulau Tulai, (2) Tekek-Juara Cross island trail on
Pulau Tioman (from Kg. Tekek to Kg. Juara)
Etymology. - This species is named after the type local-
ity for the holotype (Pulau Tioman = Tioman Island)
Distribution. - Endemic to Pulau Tioman and adjacent
Pulau Tulai (Fig. 2).
Comparisons. - Dibamus tiomanensis was listed as D.
cf. alfredi owing to its geographic proximity to D. alfre-
di , which occurs in Peninsular Malaysia and Thailand
(Manthey and Grossman, 1997; Taylor 1963). The pres-
ence of four scales bordering the first infralabial posteri-
orly differentiates the new species, Dibamus tiomanen-
sis, from D. bogadeki, D. booliati , D. bourreti , D. dehar-
vengi, D. greeri , D, ingeri, D. kondaoensis, D. mon-
tanus, D. smithi, D. somsaki, and D. vorisi. In having
one post ocular present, D. tiomanensis differs from D.
alfredi, D. celebensis, D. novaeguineae, D. seramensis,
and D. taylori. From the remaining two congeners, D.
i 1 i i
1 mm 1 mm
Figure 4. Lateral (A), dorsal (B), and ventral (C) view of
heads of Dibamus alfredi (left) and Dibamus
novaeguineae (right). Figures from Greer (1985). [f:
frontal, fn: frontonasal, ip: interparietal, if: first infralabial,
I: labial suture, m: mental, n: nasal suture, o: ocular, po:
postocular, si: supralabial]
tiomanensis differs from D. montanus Smith, 1921
(Langbian Plateau, Vietnam) in having more pre-sacral
vertebrae (124 vs. 112-114) and D. leucurus (Bleeker,
1860) (Sumatra, Borneo) in the presence of slightly pos-
teriorly notched cycloid scales as an adult.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 5
Table 2. Matrix of diagnostic characters and their states for species of Dibamus (modified from Greer, 1985).
* = See Table 1 for information on this character state.
D. nicobaricum is included in this study following
Das' ( 1 996) redescription and reevaluation of the species
(in which it is inaccurately referred to as D. nicobaricus
through parts of the paper) despite Honda et al. (2001)
avoidance of it's recognition as a nominate species.
Great difficulty arises in finding specimens of
Dibamus for study due to their fossorial lifestyle. As a
result, many descriptions are based on 2-5 individuals.
An unusually large collection of D. novaeguineae from
Mt. Canlaon, Negros Island, Philippines (Greer,
1985:150) has given a unique insight to how variable
morphological characters can be within a single popula-
tion (See Table 1). Further studies are needed in study-
ing variation within this family as slight character state
variances have warranted the recognition of new species
[See Das and Lim (2003), Das and Yaakob (2003), and
this paper] which may prove to be a variant of an already
described taxon.
Vol. 10, p. 6
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Table 3. Sacral vertebrae count of described species of
Dibamus.
Natural History
The holotype was found under a large stone in Kampung
Paya, Pulau Tioman. ZRC 2.5092 was found beneath
leaf litter in loose dirt adjacent to a large rock and bam-
boo stands in secondary forest along the trail to Bukit
Bakau on Pulau Tulai at 20 m elevation. ZRC.2.5260
was found beneath a decaying log one meter from the
cross-island trail in primary forest on Pulau Tioman.
Adult Dibamus tiomanensis displayed a behavior
most likely intended to ward off a predator. When
picked up or startled, the body scales flare up at an angle
almost perpendicular to the body. When viewed, the
smooth surface appears rugose, resembling the bristle-
covered epidermis of an earthworm. It is possible that a
non-palatable species of worm exists in the same area
and has served as a model for D. tiomanensis to mimic.
Darevsky (1992) mentions that D. greeri has bright blue
rings on its body, perhaps mimicking a megascolicid
worm inhabiting the same leaf litter. Such mimicking
behavior was also recently reported in D. booliati (Das
and Yaakob, 2003).
Acknowledgments
We thank Mr. Sahir bin Othman, Director of Wildlife,
Perhilitan, for permission to conduct fieldwork in the
Seribuat Archipelago and Peter Ng, Chang Man Tang
and Kelvin Kok Peng Lim for the loan of specimens. We
also thank Allen Greer and Ted Papenfuss for reviewing
the manuscript. We especially thank Indraneil Das for
his significant contribution to the manuscript and for
providing sacral counts. We would also like to thank all
the students of Tropical Field Biology 487e from La
Sierra University who provided field assistance, and
Karen Klitz for her help with Fig. 2.
Literature Cited
Bullock, J. A. and L. Medway. 1966. Observations on
the Fauna of Pulau Tioman and Pulau Tulai:
General Introduction. Bulletin of the National
Museum, Republic of Singapore. No. 34, March
1966.
Darevsky, I. S. 1992. Two new species of worm-like
lizard Dibamus (Sauria: Dibamidae) with remarks
on the distribution and ecology of Dibamus in
Vietnam. Asiatic Herpetological Research 4:1-12
Das, I. 1996. The validity of Dibamus nicobaricum
(Fitzinger in Steindaehner, 1867) (Squamata:
Sauria: Dibamidae). Russian Journal of
Herpetology3(2): 157-162
Das, I. and K. K. P. Lim. 2003. Two new species of
Dibamus (Squamata: Dibamidae) from Borneo.
Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 51(1): 137-141 .
Das, I. and N. Yaakob. 2003. A new species of Dibamus
(Squamata: Dibamidae) from Peninsular Malaysia.
Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 51(1): 143- 147
Greer, A. E. 1985. The relationships of the lizard gen-
era Anelytropsis and Dibamus. Journal of
Herpetology 19:116-156.
Honda, M. and J. Nabhitabhata, H. Ota., T. Hikida.
1997. A new species of Dibamus (Squamata:
Dibamidae) from Thailand. Raffles Bulletin of
Zoology 45(2):275-279
Honda, M., H. Ota, T. Hikida, and I. S. Darevsky 2001.
A new species of the worm-like lizard, Dibamus
Dumeril & Bibron 1839 (Squamata Dibamidae),
from Vietnam. Tropical Zoology 14:119-125.
Ineich, I. 1999. Une nouvelle espece de Dibamus
(Reptilia: Squamata: Dibamidae) du Vietnam.
Bulletin de la Societe zoologique de France 124
(3):279-286
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 7
Lim, K. P and L. J. Lim. 1999. The terrestrial herpeto-
fauna of Pulau Tioman, Peninsular Malaysia.
Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 6:131-155.
Manthey, U. and W. Grossmann. 1997. Amphibien &
Reptilien Siidostasiens. NTV Verlag, Munster, 512
pp.
Taylor, E. H. 1962. New oriental reptiles. University of
Kansas Science Bulletin 44( 14):687- 1 077
Taylor, E. H. 1963. The lizards of Thailand. University
of Kansas Science Bulletin 44:687-1077.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, pp. 8-
A New Species of Leptolalax (Anura: Megophryidae) from
Pulau Tioman, West Malaysia
L. Lee Grismer, Jesse L. Grismer, and Timothy M. Youmans
Department of Biology, La Sierra University, Riverside, CA 92515-8247
Abstract. - A new species of Leptolalax is described from a cave at the top of Gunung Kajang, Pulau Tioman, Pahang,
West Malaysia. It differs from all other Malaysian species of Leptolalax in several aspects of coloration and in hav-
ing smooth as opposed to rough or pebbled skin on the dorsum.
Key words. - Leptolalax , Anura, Tioman, Malaysia.
Introduction
There are at least eight species of Leptolalax found
throughout West Malaysia and Borneo (Berry, 1975;
Inger et al., 1995; Inger et al., 1997; Matsui, 1997) but
only one of these, L. gracilis, is known from both
regions. In an unpublished document, Day (1990)
reported Leptobrachium sp. from Pulau Tioman,
Pahang, West Malaysia based on five larvae collected in
the Tengkuk Air Cave (Gua) at 1000 m elevation on
Gunung Kajang. Lim and Lim (1999) referred these lar-
vae to Leptolalax gracilis based on three additional lar-
vae they collected at a lower elevation (ca. 400 m) on
Gunung Kajang. More recently, Grismer et al. (2004)
reported two adults from Gua Tengkuk Air.
Examination of those adults indicates that they belong to
the genus Leptolalax not Leptobrachium (but they are
not L. gracilis). We therefore, refer these specimens and
the larvae of Lim and Lim (1999) to the new species
described herein.
Materials and Methods
The following measurements were made with sliding
calipers to the nearest 0. 1 mm: adults; snout-vent length
(SVL), tibial length (TL), head width (HW), head length
(HL), and diameter of tympanum (TYM). Tadpoles
(Table 1); interorbital distance (IOD), intemarial dis-
tance (IND), tail length (TL), and tail height (TH).
Tadpoles were preserved in 10% formalin and trans-
ferred to 70% ethanol. Due to shrinking and wrinkling,
head-body width (HBW), head-body height (HBH), and
tail height (TH) are likely to be underestimated.
Observations on external morphology were made with
the use of a dissecting microscope. Specimens were
compared to material listed in Appendix I and descrip-
tions in Berry (1975), Inger (1985), Inger et al. (1997),
Inger et al. (1995), Inger and Stuebing (1997), Malkmus
(1992), and Matsui (1997).
Leptolalax kajangensis , new species
(Figs. 1-2)
Holotype. - ZRC 1.7714; adult male, 34.0 mm SVL;
found inside Gua Tengkuk Air, Gunung Kajang, Pulau
Tioman, Pahang, West Malaysia at 1000 m in elevation.
Collected by Jesse L. Grismer and Timothy M. Youmans
on 21 July, 2001.
Paratype. - ZRC 1.7715; adult male, 35.0 mm SVL.
Same data as holotype.
Diagnosis. - Leptolalax kajangensis differs from all
other Malaysian species of Leptolalax in lacking distinct
dark crossbands on the limbs and having a generally
dark, unicolor to weekly patterned dorsum. It differs fur-
ther from L. arayai, L. dringi, L. gracilis, L. hamidi, and
L. maurus, in having smooth, as opposed to rough, warty
skin. It differs further from L. dringi, L. gracilis, and L.
heteropus in lacking dark spots on the ventrum. It dif-
fers further from L. gracilis and L. hamidi in lacking a
dark inguinal blotch and from L. gracilis in lacking a
distinctly bicolored forelimb and dark markings on the
ventral surface of the foreleg.
Description of holotype. - Habitus moderately slender,
head longer than wide; snout rounded in dorsal profile,
weakly projecting beyond lower jaw; nostrils raised,
directed dorsolaterally, and situated on canthi, near tip of
snout; canthi rounded; lores slightly oblique; eye large,
diameter slightly longer than length of snout; intemarial
distance less than interorbital distance; interorbital width
slightly greater than length of snout; tympanum visible,
less than one-half diameter of eye, separated from eye
by width of tympanum; vomerine teeth absent; tongue
notched, without papillae.
Forelimbs slender; fingers slender, unwebbed, tips
rounded; first finger equal in length to second; no subar-
ticular tubercles or elongate comified pads visible
beneath fingers; large inner palmar tubercle present and
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p.9
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Figure 1. Photograph of Leptolalax kajangensis , new
species, on forest leaf litter.
much smaller outer palmar tubercle at base of fourth
digit.
Hindlimbs relatively short; heels overlap when
limbs flexed; tibiotarsal articulation of adpressed limb
reaches tip of snout; tips of toes rounded; third and fifth
toe equal in length; slight webbing between first and
second and second and third toes only; oval inner
metatarsal tubercle present; subarticular tubercles
absent.
Skin on back smooth to faintly pebbled; flanks
faintly pebbled; limbs smooth to faintly pebbled; promi-
nant supratympanic fold extending from eyelid to shoul-
der; ventral surfaces smooth.
Coloration. - In life and ethanol, dorsal surfaces almost
black with no visible pattern except for minute, faint,
light-colored spots; limbs slightly lighter with faint dark
mottling; faint dark mottling on flanks blending to gray-
ish dusty ventral surfaces punctated by minute gray
spots. Supratympanic fold darker than dorsum. Iris
metallic gold in life.
Measurements of holotype. - SVL 34.0 mm; TL 14.2
mm; HW 18.5 mm; HL 10.0 mm; TYM 1.6 mm.
Variation. - The paratype closely approximates the
holotype in all aspects of coloration and morphology. It
differs in the following measurements: SVL 35.0 mm;
TL 14.6 mm; HW 19.4 mm; HL 9.4 mm TYM 1.8 mm.
Etymology. - This species is named after the type local-
ity of Gunung Kajang, Pulau Tioman, West Malaysia
Tadpoles. - Table 1 lists measurements, growth stages,
and tooth row formulae of tadpoles. Based on specimens
(ZRC 1.3339-41); stages 30, 36, and 37 (Gosner, 1960)
from a small stream at 333 m below Gua Tengkuk Air on
G. Kajang and specimens (0051-54 uncatalogued spec-
imens in the British Museum reported by Day, 1990)
stage 30 (Gosner, 1960) from Gua Tengkuk Air. Head
and body relatively large and round; nostrils dorsally
located, closer to tip of snout than eye; eyes dorsolater-
al, not visible from below; spiracle sinistral, nearer to
eye than vent; vent dextral, opening at margin of ventral
fin; dorsal fin slightly deeper than ventral fin, not
extending onto head-body; fins not deeper than caudal
musculature; oral apparatus not emarginate; mouth sub-
terminal; bordered by a single row of conical papillae;
large submarginal papillae without denticles; jaw
sheaths black, robust, strongly arched, and finely serrat-
ed; upper jaw lacking medial notch; denticles small;
rows A1 and P5 markedly shorter than adjacent rows.
Tadpoles (ZRC. 1 .3339-41) from stream dusky brown
above with faint darker mottling; venter cream colored,
nearly immaculate; faint dark stippling on caudal fins,
edges clear and immaculate; lateral line hash marks dis-
tinct. Tadpoles from Gua Tengkuk Air (uncatalogued
BM specimens) lack pigment and are white to transpar-
ent in life.
Comparisons with other species. - Leptolalax kajan-
gensis differs from all other Malaysian species of
Leptolalax on the basis of skin surface texture and col-
oration. Leptolalax arayai , L. dringi , L. gracilis , L.
hamaidi , L. m auras , and L. pe/odvtoides all have coarse-
ly textured skin ranging from distinctive corrugations in
Table 1. Selected measurements (mm), growth stage (GS), and labial tooth row formulae (LTRF) of Leptolalax
kajangensis. Abbreviations follow Materials and Methods. * = Specimen damaged.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 10
Figure 2. Tadploe of Leptolalax kajangensis at type local-
ity.
L. dringi to isolated tubercles of varying sizes in L. gra-
cilis (Inger and Stuebing, 1997; Inger et al. 1997;
Matsui, 1997). Leptolalax kajangensis resembles L. pic-
tus and L. pelodytoides in having smooth to weakly peb-
bled skin on the dorsum (Inger et al. 1995) but differs
from L. pictus in lacking small tubercles on its sides
(Malkmus, 1992). Leptolalax kajangensis falls within
the size range (SVL 34.0-35.0 mm) of L. dringi (SVL
30.0-38.8 mm), L. gracilis (SVL 31.0-48.0 mm), L. het-
eropus (SVL 33.0-35.0 mm), L. pelodytoides (SVL 30.0-
42.0 mm), and L. pictus (SVL 3 1 .0-47.0 mm) but is larg-
er than L. arayai (SVL 29.9) and L. mams (SVL 26.0-
32.0). Leptolalax kajangensis differs most notably from
other species in coloration. Its generally unicolor black
dorsal pattern contrasts sharply with the various mottled
body patterns of L. dringi , L. hamidi, L. heteropus , L
pelodytoides , and L. pictus. It does resemble L. maurus
to some extent in that L. maurus has a black unicolored
dorsum but differs in that the latter also has lighter col-
ored limbs with darker crossbars and light colored spots
on the flanks, patterns which are absent in L. kajangen-
sis. Leptolalax gracilis also has a generally dark dorsal
coloration with varying degress of dark mottling but is
distinctive in having a light colored brachium. The sin-
gle specimen of L. arayi has a light ground color with
darker crossbands on the limbs.
Natural history. - Both specimens of Leptolalax kajan-
gensis were found in a cave (Gua Tengkuk Air) near the
summit of Gunung Kajang at approximately 1000 m in
elevation. This subterranean, obliquely oriented cavern
is formed from the overhang of large boulders piled on
top of one another. It contains a small pond (3 m x 4 in)
drained by a small subterranean stream (1-3 m in width
by 2-4 cm in depth) running for 3-4 m along the cave
floor. Both specimens of L. kajangensis were observed
in the afternoon sitting on top of large rocks adjacent to
the stream approximately 10 m from the entrance to the
cave and approximately 10 m below the outside ground
level. It was from the subterranean pond that Day (1990)
collected "large tadpoles" he referred to as
Leptobrachium sp. We observed additional tadpoles and
assume these to be larvae of Leptolalax kajangensis
based on the fact that the type material were collected
from the same stream and adults were observed calling
from the edge of the pond.
Three additional larvae examined here
(ZRC. 1.3339-41) were collected from a lower stream on
Gunung Kajang at approximately 400 m on 26 June
1996 (Lim and Lim, 1999). We tentatively assign these
to Leptolalax kajangensis because they match the larvae
from Tengkuk Air in morphology (Table 1). However,
the Tengkuk Air specimens lack pigment and are white
to transparent in life (Fig. 2). ZRC. 1 .3339-41 are coun-
tershaded with dark pigment above and have minute
dark flecks on a light venter. This indicates that either L.
kajangensis is not confined to only the upper most ele-
vations of Gunung Kajang or that there may be an addi-
tional species of Leptolalax found lower down on the
mountain.
Biogeography. - Pulau Tioman had a land positive con-
nection with Peninsular Malaysia as late as the
Pleistocene (Voris, 2000). The presence of amphibian
species on Pulau Tioman such as Leptolalax kajangen-
sis, Megophrys nasuta , Rana hosii , R. picturata and oth-
ers that require streams with moderate to strong currents
for reproduction suggests these species are unlikely can-
didates for long distance dispersal over flat, low-lying
landscape (Inger and Voris, 2001). Pulau Tioman was
part of a large granitic arc of mountains extending from
what is currently peninsular Malaysia through the
Kepulauan Anambas and Natunas across the Greater
Sunda Shelf which provided a dispersal corridor for
montane species (Inger and Voris, 2001) across the flat,
low-lying exposed Sunda Shelf. Thus, the presence of
stream-breeding species requiring moderate to fast flow-
ing water on Pulau Tioman is most likely a result of vic-
ariance.
Acknowledgments
We thank Mr. Sahir bin Othman, Director of Wildlife,
PERHILITAN, for permission to conduct field work in
the Seribuat Archipelago. We thank Peter Ng and
Kelvin Lim of Raffles Museum of Biodiversity
Research (ZRC) and Harold Voris and Alan Resetar of
the Field Museum of Natural History (FMNH) for
allowing us to examine specimens in their care. For
comments on the manuscript we are grateful to R. F.
Inger and for field assistance we thank Geoff Powells.
Vol. 10, p. 11
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Literature Cited
Berry, P. Y, 1975. The Amphibian Fauna of Peninsular
Malaysia. Tropical Press, Kuala Lumpur.
Day, M. 1990. Zoological research. In: Day, M. and T.
Mowbray (eds.). University of Bristol Tioman
Archipelago Expedition, Peninsular Malaysia,
1988, Final Report. Unpublished Report pp. 25-43.
Gosner, K. L. 1960. A simplified table for staging anu-
ran embryos and larvae with notes on identification.
Herpetologica 16:183-190.
Grismer, J. L., L. L. Grismer, I. Das, N. S. Yaakob, L. B.
Liat, L. T. Ming, T. M. Youmans, R. A. Sosa, and H.
Kaiser. 2004. Species diversity and checklist of the
herpetofauna of Pulau Tioman, peninsular Malaysia
with a preliminary overview of habitat utilization.
Asiatic Hereptological Reserch 10:247-279.
Inger, R. F. 1985. Tadpoles of the forested regions of
Borneo. Fieldiana Zoololgy. New Series No.26:l-
89.
Inger, R. F., M. Lakim, A. Biun, and P. Yambun, 1997.
A new species of Leptolalax (Anura:Megophryidae)
from Borneo. Asiatic Herpetological Reserach 7:48-
50.
Inger, R. F. and R. B. Stuebing, 1997. A Field Guide to
Frogs of Borneo. Natural History Publications,
Kota Kinabalau.
Inger, R. F., R. B. Stuebing, and F. L. Tan. 1995. New
species and new records of anurans from Borneo.
Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 43 : 1 1 5- 1 3 1 .
Inger, R. F. and H. K. Voris. 2001. The biogeographical
relations of the frogs and snakes of Sundaland.
Journal of Biogeography 28:863-891.
Lim, K. K. P. and L. J. Lim. 1999. The terrestrial her-
petofauna of Pulau Tioman, Peninsular Malaysia.
Raffles Bulletin of Zoology. Supplement 6:131-
155.
Malkmus, R. 1992. Leptolalax pictus, sp. nov. (Anura:
Pelobatidae) vom Mount Kinabalu/Nord-Borneo.
Sauria, Berlin 14:3-6.
Mastsui, M. 1997. Call characteristics of Malaysian
Leptolalax with a description of two new species
(Anura: Pelodatidae). Copeia 1997:158-165.
Voris, H. K. 2000. Maps of Pleistocene sea levels in
Southeast Asia: shorelines, river systems, time dur-
ations. Journal of Biogeography 27:1153-1167.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, pp. 12-16]
A New Species of Kukri Snake, Oligodon (Colubridae),
from Pulau Tioman, West Malaysia.
Tzi Ming Leong1 and L. Lee Grismer2
* Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119260
- Department of Biology, La Sierra University, Riverside, California 92515-8247, USA
Abstract. - A unique species of Oligodon is described from the type locality of Pulau Tioman, West Malaysia. In
terms of scalation, it is most comparable with the Bornean O. subcarinatus, but does not exhibit any feeble keeling
of scales. In addition, its body color and patterns are unique in having a red dorsum, pink ventral surface, and indis-
tinct pale bars on the nape and body.
Key words. - Oligodon , kukri snake, Pulau Tioman, West Malaysia.
Introduction
The kukri snakes belonging to the genus Oligodon Boie,
1827 are so named because of the presence of unique
posterior maxillary teeth, shaped like Ghurka kukri
knives. In addition, members belonging to this genus are
small to medium-sized ground dwelling species charac-
terised by having a large slightly upturned rostral shield,
short head, round pupil, and a cylindrical body with
smooth scales (Tweedie, 1983; Cox et al., 1998). Many
species possess a distinct dark chevron mark on the nape
and a stripe across the anterior part of the head and down
over/through the eye. Although Oligodon is well repre-
sented in South and Southeast Asia, there are only three
species on Peninsular Malaysia, namely O. octolineatus
Schneider, O. purpurascens Schlegel, and O. signatus
Gunther (Tweedie, 1983). In Borneo, eight species have
been recorded [O. annulifer Boulenger, O. cinereus
Gunther, O. everetti Boulenger, O. octolineatus
Schneider, O. purpurascens Schlegel, O. signatus
Gunther, O. subcarinatus Gunther, and O. vertebralis
Gunther]. However, the occurrences of true O. annulifer
and O. cinereus on Borneo remain to be verified
(Stuebing and Inger, 1999).
On Pulau Tioman, ca. 40 km from the southeast
coast of the peninsula, one species ( O . purpurascens)
has been reliably recorded thus far (Grismer et al., 2004;
Hendrickson, 1966). The presence of O. octolineatus on
the island, though possible, remains to be verified (Lim
and Lim, 1999). Day (1990: 38) reported the presence of
a distinct, new form of Oligodon from the cross-island
(Tekek-Juara) trail, but did not provide any diagnostic
characters. It was merely mentioned that this form
resembled O. signatus , but had differences in terms of
head scalation and dorsal colouration. We collected a
specimen from the same locality on 16 July, 2001 that is
different from all other nominal species of Malaysia and
is herein named and described as new.
Materials and Methods
Prior to preservation in 10% formaldehyde, the speci-
men was photographed and liver tissue sampled. Total
length, tail length, and snout-vent length were obtained
using a measuring tape (to nearest 1 mm). Additional
measurements taken, using vernier callipers (to nearest
0.1 mm), include eye diameter (ED); head length (HL),
taken from the union of the posteromedial comers of the
parietals to the tip of the snout; head depth (HD), taken
from the dorsal surface of the head to the ventral surface
of the jaw immediately posterior to the eye; and snout
length (SL), taken from the anterior margin of the eye to
the tip of the snout. The scale counts included upper
labials, number of upper labials in contact with eye,
lower labials, preoculars, postoculars, ventrals, subcau-
dals, and midbody scales. Comparative material was
examined from the Zoological Reference Collection
(ZRC) [Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research
(RMBR), National University of Singapore], the
Department of Wildlife and National Parks, Peninsular
Malaysia (DWNP) herpetological collection, the Bishop
Museum, Hawaii (BPBM), and Museum fur
Naturkunde, Humboldt-Universitat, Berlin, Germany
(ZMB).
Oligodon booliati, sp. nov.
Holotype: ZRC.2.5153, adult female, collected on the
night of 16 July, 2001, at 2130 hrs by T. M. Leong and
K. M. Crane, while it was crawling on a concrete stair-
case in primary forest along the Tekek-Juara trail, ca.
150 m ash, Pulau Tioman (Pahang, Peninsular
Malaysia). Deposited at the Zoological Reference
Collection (ZRC).
Paratypes: (1) BPBM 13933, subadult male, collected
on 17 April 1962 by J. R. Hendrickson, at Ulu Lalang,
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Vol. 10 p. 13
Figure 1. Dorsal view of Oligodon booliati holotype, ZRC.2.5153 (live coloration).
ca. 700 m asl and (2) ZMB 64446, adult female, collect-
ed in May 2001 by W. Grossmann and C. Scafer on the
top of the Tekek-Juara Trail at 300 in asl.
Diagnosis. - 6-7 upper labials, 2nd and 3 rd or 3rd and
4th touching eye, 7 lower labials, 17 mid-body scales,
143-153 ventrals, 54-60 subcaudals. Loreals present.
Head scales without distinct patterns. No distinct stripe
running through eye. In life, body deep maroon red dor-
sally and along flanks, salmon pink on the ventrals and
subcaudals. Ventrals without dark spots. Indistinct dark
brown transverse bars (19-22) on body, starting from
nape and fading increasingly towards tail. Thin, dark
brown stripes on anterior sides of 5th and 6th upper labi-
als, immediately posterior to eye.
Description of Holotype. - Adult female, total length:
510 mm, tail: 121 mm, snout-vent: 389 mm, ED: 2.2
mm, HL: 10.8 mm, HD: 6.9 mm, SL: 5.0 mm; head stout
(HD/HL 0.64), slightly broader than neck; snout moder-
ate, oblique in dorsal profile, oval in lateral profile; eye
20% of head length, pupil round; rostral shield large, tri-
angular, visible from above, width (3.5 mm) greater than
height (3.0 mm), concave below; rostral in direct contact
with first upper labials, nasals and internasals; trapezoid
prefrontals posterior to intemasals, curving at canthus
rostrals to meet triangular postnasals; single, almost tri-
angular frontal, slightly longer (4.8 mm) than wide (4.2
mm), posterior point terminating 1.2 mm beyond poste-
rior margin of eye; frontal flanked by prominent
supraoculars, length of supraocular (3.0 mm) 1 .4 of ED;
7 upper labials, increasing in size to 6th, 3rd and 4th in
contact with eye; a small (0.5 x 0.5 mm) loreal scale
present on left, but absent on right, allowing contact
between right prefrontal and 2nd upper labial; one preoc-
ular and one postocular present on both sides; 7 lower
labials, first pair elongated transversely, confining men-
tal to meet medially, 4th pair largest; anterior chinsh ields
longer than (almost double) posterior chinshields; 17
scale rows at neck and midbody, but 15 at one head
length anterior to vent; 143 ventrals, lateral margins vis-
ible from the sides; 59 subcaudals, all divided; anal
shield single. Colour in life deep maroon red on dorsum
and flanks (Fig. 1). Ventrals salmon pink, the colour
becoming increasingly intense towards the tail tip (Fig.
2), without any melanistic pigmentation. Head scales
without markings dorsally. Distinguishable grey-brown
pigmentation visible in other head scales: dorsal portion
of 4th upper labial (point of contact with eye), anterior
margins of 5th and 6th upper labials, anterior margins of
1st to 4th lower labials, in between anterior chinshields
towards the anterior, within mental, and lower surface of
rostral. Crossbars on body faint. 21 crossbars from nape
towards tail tip. Upon preservation, and storage in alco-
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 14
Table 1 Measurements, scale counts, and number of crossbars among Oligodon booliati sp. nov. type materials (holo-
type and two paratypes). L/R = Left/Right sides.
Figure 2. Ventral view of Oligodon booliati holotype,
ZRC.2.5153 (live colouration).
hoi, the colours gradually faded to a lighter shade. A lat-
eral view of the head is illustrated in Fig. 3.
Description of paratypes. - Rostral shield large, visible
from above. BPBM 13933 has 7 upper labials with the
3rd and 4th touching eye. ZMB 64446 has 6 upper labials
with the 2nd and 3rd touching the eye. Loreal scale (0.5
x 0.5 mm) present on both sides in BPBM 13933 and
fused to the postnasal on both sides in ZMB 64446 (1.0
x 1.0 mm). One preocular and one postocular. Seven
lower labials, 17 midbody scales, 146 ventrals, 60 sub-
caudals in BPMB 13933 and 153 ventrals and 54 sub-
caudals in ZMB 64446. First pair of infralabials separat-
ed medially by the mental in ZMB 64446. Total length
(BPBM 13933): 348 mm; tail: 88 mm; snout-vent: 260
i i
Figure 3. Lateral view of head (left side) of Oligodon boo-
liati holotype, ZRC.2.5153. Scale bar = 5mm.
mm. Total length (ZMB 64446): 373 mm; tail: 82 mm;
snout-vent: 291 mm. Anal shield single, subcaudals
paired. Colour in preservative faded to a cream colour.
No distinctly striking markings on head, faint crossbars
on body (22 in BPBM 13933, 19 in ZMB 64446).
Measurements and scale counts of type materials are
summarised in Table 1 .
Etymology. - This new species is named in honor of
Lim Boo Liat, of the Department of Wildlife and
National Parks (Peninsular Malaysia), whose contribu-
tions to our better understanding of Malaysia's natural
history dates back to the 1950's. Flis publications include
the description of a new snake ( Macrocalamus tweediei
Li in, 1963) and the popular reference book Poisonous
Snakes of Peninsular Malaysia (Lim, 1982).
Vol. 10 p. 15
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Table 2. Comparisons between the Oligodon species (arranged alphabetically) of Peninsular Malaysia and Borneo,
including Oligodon booliati sp. nov. (measurements and scalations after Manthey & Grossmann, 1997). Lo = Loreal,
UL - Upper Labials, MB = Midbody, V = Ventrals, SC = Subcaudals.
Discussion
The number of upper labials (6-7) in Oligodon booliati
may be used to distinguish it from O. purpurascens (8)
and O. taeniatus (8), although O. annulifer and O.
cinerens may occasionally possess eight upper labials.
O. booliati shares the same number of midbody scales
(17) as O. octolineatus, O. signatus, and O. subcarina-
tus (instead of 15 in O. annulifer , O. everetti and O. ver-
tebral is) but may be distinguished from O. octolineatus
by the absence of any longitudinal stripes along the
body, from O. signatus by the presence of loreal scales,
and from O. subcarinatus by the lack of feeble keels on
its scales. This new species is assumed to be endemic to
Pulau Tioman. Comparisons of measurements and scala-
tion between O. booliati and the other species of
Oligodon in Peninsular Malaysia and Borneo are sum-
marised in Table 2.
Comparative Material Examined
Oligodon bitorquatus. - ZRC.2.3875, Bandung, West
Java; ZRC.2.3876, Gunong Hedjo, Cheribon, West Java;
ZRC.2.3957, Pengalengan, Java.
Oligodon octolineatus. - ZRC.2.2295, 2399, 2559,
3161, 3850, 3853-3855, 3859-3860, 3865, 5058,
Singapore; 3861, 3863-3864, Johor Bahru, Johor,
Peninsular Malaysia; 3862, 3867, Selangor, Peninsular
Malaysia.
Oligodon purpurascens. - ZRC.2.3869, Sumatra,
Indonesia; ZRC.2.3877-3879, Singapore; ZRC.2.3880-
3881, Pulau Gallang, Riau, Sumatra, Indonesia;
ZRC.2.3882, 3884, 3885, 3887, Johor, Peninsular
Malaysia; ZRC.2.3883, Forest Research Institute
Malaysia, Kepong, Selangor, Peninsular Malaysia;
ZRC.2.3886, 3888, Fraser's Hill, Pahang, Peninsular
Malaysia; Bishop Mus. 14211, Pulau Tioman.
Oligodon signatus. - DWNP.R.0005, Forest Research
Institute Malaysia, Kepong, Selangor, Peninsular
Malaysia; ZRC.2.4159, Bukit Asahan, Malacca,
Peninsular Malaysia; ZRC.2.3203, 3388, 3400, 3871-
3873, 3958, 4842, Singapore.
Oligodon taeniatus. - ZRC.2.4161, Bangkok, Thailand.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Sahir bin Othman (Perhilitan -
Department of Wildlife and National Parks, Peninsular
Malaysia), for permission to conduct research in the
Seribuat Archipelago; Lim Boo Liat (DWNP), Norsham
Yaakob (Forest Research Institute Malaysia), Karen M.
Crane (La Sierra University) for their enthusiastic and
active participation in the field; Karla H. Kishinami
(BPBM) and Wolfgang Grossmann (ZMB) for the loan
of specimens; Peter K. L. Ng and Kelvin K. P. Lim
(RMBR) for granting access to literature and specimens;
Robert B. Stuebing for examining the holotype and
reviewing the manuscript with encouraging rigour;
Robert F. Inger (FMNH) for critical and useful com-
ments which greatly improved the manuscript.
Literature Cited
Boie, F. 1827. Bemerkungen uber Merrem's Versuch
eines Systems der Amphibien, I. Lieferung:
Ophidier. - Isis van Oken, Jena, 20:508-566.
Cox, M. J., P. P. Van Dijk, J. Nabhitabhata and K.
Thirakhupt. 1998. A photographic guide to snakes
and other reptiles of Peninsular Malaysia,
Singapore and Thailand. New Holland. 144 pp.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 16
Day, M. 1990. Zoological Research. In: Day, M. and T.
Mowbray (eds.). University of Bristol Tioman
Archipelago Expedition, Peninsular Malaysia,
1988, Final Report. Unpublished Report pp. 25-43.
Hendrickson, J. R., 1966. Observations on the fauna of
Pulau Tioman and Pulau Tulai. 5. The reptiles.
Bulletin of Natural History 34:53-71.
Grismer, J. L., L. L. Grismer, I. Das, N. S. Yaakob, L. B.
Liat, T. M. Leong, T. M. Youmans, and H. Kaiser.
2004. Species diversity and checklist of the herpeto
fauna of Pulau Tioman, Peninsular Malaysia, with a
preliminary overview of habitat utilization. Asiatic
Herpetological Research 10:247-279.
Lim, B. L. 1963. Macrocalamus tweediei, a new species
of Reed Snake from Malaya. Bulletin of the Nat.
Mus., Singapore 32:99-102, 1 Fig.
Lim, B. L. 1982. Poisonous snakes of Peninsular Malay-
sia. Second Edition, Malayan Nature Society in
association with Institute for Medical research,
Kuala Lumpur, 73 pp.
Lim, K. K. P. and L. J. Lim, 1999. The terrestrial her-
petofauna of Pulau Tioman. Peninsular Malaysia.
Raffles Bulletin of Zoology. Supplement No. 6:131-
155.
Manthey, U. and W. Grossmann. 1997. Amphibien und
Reptilien Siidostasiens. Natur und Tier-Verlag,
Matthias Schmidt, Munster. 511 pp.
Stuebing, R. B. and R. F. Inger, 1999. A field guide to the
snakes of Borneo. Natural History Publications
(Borneo), Kota Kinabalu, v + 254 pp.
Tweedie, M. W. F., 1983. The snakes of Malaya. 3rd
Edition. Singapore (National Printers Pte. Ltd.) 167
pp.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, pp. 17-21
A New Philautus (Amphibia: Rhacophoridae) from Northern Laos
Bryan L. Stuart1-’3’* and Harold F. Heatwole4
1 Field Museum oj Natural History, Department of Zoology, Division of Amphibians & Reptiles,
MOOS. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois, USA 60605-2496;
•ji;
Corresponding author: E-mail: bstuart@fieldmuseum.org
-University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Biological Sciences, 845 W. Taylor,
Chicago, Illinois, USA 60607-7060
^Wildlife Conservation Society, P.O. Box 6712, Vientiane, Laos
4 North Carolina State University, Department of Zoology, P.O. Box 7617, Raleigh,
North Carolina, USA 27695-7617; E-mail: harold heatwole@ncsu.edu
Abstract. - A new Philautus is described from Phou Dendin National Biodiversity Conservation Area in northern
Laos. Philautus petilus sp. nov. is most remarkable by having a very slender, elongate habitus. Other distinguishing
characteristics include having a tympanum diameter 80% of the eye diameter, white asperities on the dorsum, and
distinctive coloration consisting of a soft yellow-beige dorsolateral surface with broken black stripes posteriorly, a
lavender wash on dorsal surface of limbs, upper lip, and sides, a black stripe below edge of canthus extending from
snout tip to flanks near level of mid-body, and a black spot equal in diameter to the tympanum located just anterior
to the inguinal region.
Key words. - Laos, new species, Philautus , Rhacophoridae.
Introduction
Bourret (1942) remains the major work on the amphib-
ians of Laos, supplemented only recently by descrip-
tions of new species (Inger and Kottelat 1998; Stuart and
Papenfuss 2002). Consequently, the amphibian fauna of
Laos is imperfectly known.
From 6-26 October 1999, we conducted a herpeto-
faunal survey of Phou Dendin National Biodiversity
Conservation Area in eastern Phongsaly Province,
northern Laos, near to the tri-border area of Laos,
Vietnam, and China (Figure 1 A). The area surveyed was
mostly covered in hilly evergreen forest, sometimes
mixed with stands of natural bamboo, with small, rocky
streams flowing down hillsides into the larger, swift
Nam Ou and Nam Khang Rivers, at elevations from
600-1000 m. During the course of that work we found a
single, adult female specimen of an enigmatic, rha-
cophorid treefrog, which we describe here as a new
species of Philautus.
Materials and Methods
The single specimen found was caught in the field by
hand, preserved in 10% buffered formalin, and later
transferred to 70% ethanol. A tissue sample was taken by
preserving pieces of liver in 95% ethanol betoie the
specimen was fixed in formalin. The specimen was
deposited at the Field Museum of Natural History
(FMNH).
Measurements largely follow those of Bain et al.
(2003) and were made with dial calipers to the nearest
0.1 mm. Abbreviations used are: SVL = snout-vent
length; HDL = head length from tip of snout to the com-
misure of the jaws; HDW = head width at the commisure
of the jaws; SNT = snout length from tip of snout to the
anterior comer of the eye; EYE = eye diameter; IOD =
interorbital distance; TMP = horizontal diameter of tym-
panum; TEY = tympanum-eye distance from anterior
edge of tympanum to posterior comer of the eye; FPL =
length of finger 111 disk from the base of the pad to its
tip; FPW = width of finger 111 disc at the widest part of
the pad; TPL = length of toe IV disk; TPW = width of
toe IV disk. Measurement ratios are reported as percent-
ages (%) rounded to the nearest integer.
Philautus petilus. new species
(Figure IB)
Material examined. -Holotype: FMNH 257902, adult
female, collected by the authors on 23 October 1999 in
Phou Dendin National Biodiversity Conservation Area,
Phongsaly District, Phongsaly Province, Laos,
22°05,44,'N 102°08'10,,E, at 600 m elevation.
Diagnosis. - An elongate, slender Philautus having a
head width only 27% of SVL: tympanum diameter 80%
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 18
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
CHINA
VIETNAM
MYANMAR
LAOS
THAILAND
CAMBODIA
Figure 1 A-C. A. Map showing the type locality (black dot) of Philautus petilus sp. nov. in Phongsaly Province, north-
ern Laos. B. The adult female holotype (FMNH 257902) of Philautus petilus sp. nov., anesthetized prior to preserva-
tion. Photograph by Bryan L. Stuart. C. The hand of the adult female holotype (FMNH 257902) of Philautus petilus
sp. nov. in preservation. Photograph by Nikolai L. Orlov.
of eye diameter; white asperities on head, eyelids, back,
dorsal surface of tibia and forelimbs, and anterior half of
sides; no fringes, row of enlarged tubercles, or accesso-
ry flaps of skin on outer margins of limbs; black stripe
below edge of canthus extending from tip of snout to
flanks near level of mid-body; black spot slightly anteri-
or to inguinal region, equal in diameter to the tympa-
num.
Description of Holotype. - Habitus elongate, slender;
head width 27% of SVL; head slightly longer than wide;
snout obtusely pointed in dorsal view, projecting beyond
lower jaw, round in profile, not depressed; nostril later-
al, near tip of snout; canthus rounded but distinct, con-
stricted behind nostrils; lores slightly concave, oblique;
eye diameter less than snout length, interorbital distance
wider than upper eyelid; tympanum visible, not
depressed relative to skin of temporal region, tympanic
rim slightly elevated relative to tympanum, tympanum
diameter 80% of eye diameter; weak supratympanic fold
from eye to shoulder; vomerine teeth very small, in
oblique rows closer to choanae than to each other;
tongue deeply notched posteriorly.
Tips of all four fingers expanded, about two times
the width of phalanges, with circummarginal grooves,
width of finger I disc 60% the width of finger 111 disc,
width of finger III disc 71% the diameter of tympanum;
relative finger lengths I < II < IV < III; webbing absent;
fingers III and IV with large middle subarticular tuber-
cle and smaller palmar tubercle at base; fingers I and II
with large palmar tubercle at base.
Tips of toes expanded, width of toe IV disc slightly
smaller than width of finger III disc; toe V longer than
toe III; toe I webbing to midway between subarticular
tubercle and disc, continuing only as narrow fringe to
disc; toes II, III, and IV webbing to distal subarticular
tubercle, continuing only as narrow fringe to disc; toe V
webbing to midway between distal subarticular tubercle
and base of disc, continuing only as narrow fringe to
base of disc; inner metatarsal tubercle elongated, outer
metatarsal tubercle very small, almost inconspicuous.
Skin on dorsal and ventral surfaces smooth, except
for distinct, white asperities on head, eyelids, back, dor-
sal surface of tibia and forelimbs, and anterior half of
sides; no fringes, row of enlarged tubercles, or accesso-
ry flaps of skin on outer margins of limbs.
Left ovary with fewer than 25, developing, creamy-
white ova (color in preservative).
In life, top of head and back light brown with dark
brown reticulations and scattered black spotting; dorso-
lateral surface of head and body soft yellow-beige, with
short, broken black stripe on dorsolateral surface from
level of midbody extending toward groin; lavender wash
on dorsal surface of limbs, upper lip, and sides; black
stripe below edge of canthus extending from tip of snout
to anterior border of eye, and from posterior border of
eye along supratympanic fold to flanks near level of
mid-body; black spot slightly anterior to inguinal region.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 19
equal in diameter to the tympanum; black ‘M’-shaped
marking over anus; black spot on tarsus closer to articu-
lation than foot, narrow black crossbars on hindlimbs,
some black flecking on forelimbs; venter creamy-white,
dark spotting on chin and throat, pigmentation on under-
side of hands, feet, and tibiotarsus. In preservative, yel-
low-beige and lavender coloration lost.
Measurements (mm) of holotype. - SVL 33.8; HDL
9.9; HDW 9.2; SNT 4.1; EYE 3.0; IOD 2.3; TMP 2.4;
TEY 1.5; FPL 1.5; FPW 1.7; TPL 1.3; TPW 1.4.
Comparisons. - The generic assignments of small, rha-
cophorid (or rhacophorine) treefrogs are uncertain and
debated (Bossuyt & Dubois 2001; Wilkinson et al.
2002). Therefore, we compare P petilus with all other
species of small to medium-sized rhacophorid (or rha-
cophorine) treefrogs having reduced finger webbing that
are reported from the vicinity of northern Laos, regard-
less of what genus they are currently referred to. These
include Chirixalus doriae Boulenger, C. hansenae
(Cochran), C. laevis (Smith), C. nongkhorensis
(Cochran), C. palpebralis (Smith), C. vittatus
(Boulenger), Philantus abditus Inger, Orlov, &
Darevsky, P. albopunctatus Liu & Hu, P banaensis
Bourret, P. carinensis (Boulenger), P. gracilipes
Bourret, P. gryllus Smith, P. jinxiuensis Hu, P. longchua-
nensis Yang & Li, P. maosonensis Bourret, P. menglaen-
sis Kou, P. ocellatus Liu and Hu, P. odontotarsus Ye and
Fei, P. parvulus (Boulenger), P. rhododiscus Liu and Hu,
Rhacophorus appendiculatus (Gunther), R. baliogaster
Inger, Orlov & Darevsky, R. bisacculus Taylor, R. verru-
cosus Boulenger, Theloderma asperum (Boulenger), and
T. stellatum Taylor (Bourret 1942; Taylor 1962; Inger et
al. 1999; Fei 1999; Orlov et al. 2002).
Philautus petilus differs from all species of
Chirixalus Boulenger by lacking the two outer fingers
appearing to be opposable to the two inner ones (present
in Chirixalus). Philautus petilus further differs from C.
doriae and C. nongkhorensis by lacking outer finger
webbing (outer fingers 1/3 webbed in doriae and
nongkhorensis), from C. hansenae, C. laevis and C. vit-
tatus by lacking light-colored dorsolateral stripes (pres-
ent in hansenae, laevis and vittatus), and from C. palpe-
bralis by lacking a yellow streak from below eye to
shoulder (present in palpebralis). Philautus petilus dif-
fers from P. abditus by having a visible tympanum (hid-
den in abditus) and lacking large black spots on the legs
(present in abditus). Philautus petilus differs from P
albopunctatus by having dorsal asperities (absent in
albopunctatus) and lacking white blotches on the snout,
dorsum and above anus (present in albopunctatus).
Philautus petilus differs from P. carinensis by having
the snout longer than the eye diameter (snout shorter
than eye diameter in carinensis) and by having a slender
habitus (stocky habitus in carinensis). Philautus petilus
differs from P gracilipes by having a head width 27% of
SVL (head width 45% of SVL in gracilipes), having the
width of finger III disc 71% the diameter of tympanum
(width of finger III disc equal to the diameter of tympa-
num in gracilipes), and lacking mostly green coloration
with dark-brown eyelids (present in gracilipes).
Philautus petilus differs from P. jinxiuensis by lacking a
large interorbital dark blotch extending posteriorly into
two broad, dark dorsolateral stripes (present in jinxiuen-
sis). Philautus petilus differs from P. longchuanensis by
having a tympanum diameter larger than width of finger
III disc (tympanum diameter smaller than width of fin-
ger III disc in longchuanensis). Philautus petilus differs
from P. maosonensis by having the head slightly longer
than wide (head wider than long in maosonensis ), by
having the snout projecting beyond the lower jaw (snout
not projecting beyond lower jaw in maosonensis), by
having the tympanum diameter 80% of eye diameter
(tympanum diameter approximately 2/3 eye diameter in
maosonensis), and by lacking a thin band between the
eyelids, a large dark marking on the back, and a dark
spot behind the axilla (present in maosonensis).
Philautus petilus differs from P. menglaensis by having
smooth skin with asperities on the dorsum (warty skin
on dorsum in menglaensis) and by having a tympanum
diameter larger than the width of finger III disc (tympa-
num diameter smaller than or equal to width of finger III
disc in menglaensis). Philautus petilus differs from P.
ocellatus by lacking a round black blotch on the occiput
(present in ocellatus). Philautus petilus differs from P
parvulus by having the snout longer than the eye diam-
eter (snout shorter than eye diameter in parvulus), hav-
ing a visible tympanum (hidden in pamulus), and having
the nostril close to the tip of snout (nostril midway
between eye and tip of snout in parvulus). Philautus
petilus differs from P. rhododiscus by lacking dark
brown coloration with black spots, grayish-white ventral
marbling, and reddish-orange finger and toe discs (pres-
ent in rhododiscus). Philautus petilus differs from P.
banaensis, P. gryllus , P odontotarsus, R. appendicula-
tus, R. bisacculus, and R. verrucosus by lacking dermal
fringes or tubercles on the limbs (present in banaensis,
gryllus, odontotarsus, appendiculatus , bisacculus, and
verrucosus). Philautus petilus differs from all species of
Theloderma Tschudi by having smooth skin with dorsal
asperities (skin rugose in Theloderma).
Etymology. - The species name petilus (L.) means slen-
der, referring to the distinct habitus of the holotype.
Ecology. - The holotype was collected at 2215 h on a
bamboo leaf 1 m above the ground in hilly evergreen
Vol. 10, p. 20
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
torest mixed with bamboo, approximately 200 m from
the bank of the Nam Ou River, at 600 m elevation.
Remarks. - The generic assignments of small, rha-
cophorid (or rhacophorine) treefrogs are uncertain,
debated, and likely to be considerably revised in the near
future (Bossuyt & Dubois 2001; Wilkinson et al. 2002).
Many species have been moved among the genera
Chirixalus Boulenger and Philautus Gistel (Frost 2002).
Philautus petilus does not have the two outer fingers
appearing to be opposable to the two inner ones (Figure
1C), which is diagnostic of the genus Chirixalus (Liem
1970). Historically, Philautus was diagnosed by the
absence of vomerine teeth (Leim 1970; Bossuyt and
Dubois 2001), but this character is known to vary7 with-
in a species, and consequently Liem (1970) included
species in the genus Philautus that sometimes have
vomerine teeth. Philautus petilus has very small vomer-
ine teeth. Bossuyt and Dubois (2001) proposed that only
species having direct aerial development (lacking a free-
swimming aquatic tadpole) be included in the genus
Philautus. The mode of reproduction in P. petilus is
unknown, but it does have a small clutch size (the left
ovary of the holotype holds fewer than 25 ova). Dring
(1987) reported total clutch sizes of only 2-26 eggs in
five species of Philautus , including the type species, P.
aurifasciatus. In the absence of a phylogeny and more
substantial reproductive data, we recognize that our
placement of petilus into the genus Philautus is tenta-
tive.
Acknowledgments
The opportunity to work in Laos was made possible by
the Wildlife Conservation Society / Division of Forest
Resource Conservation Cooperative Program. The
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (Vientiane, Laos)
permitted export of specimens to the Field Museum of
Natural History. Bee Thaovanseng assisted with field-
work in Laos. Financial support was provided by The
John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation (with
Harold Voris and Robert Inger), the National
Geographic Society (Grant no. 6247-98), and the
Wildlife Conservation Society. Harold Voris, Alan
Resetar, Jamie Ladonski, and Jennifer Mui facilitated
examining specimens at the Field Museum of Natural
History. Sophie Molia translated French descriptions
and Tan Fui Lian translated Chinese descriptions. Robert
Inger, Nikolai Orlov, and Jeff Wilkinson shared their
taxonomic opinions on the specimen. Nikolai Orlov
photographed the preserved specimen. Robert Inger,
Raoul Bain, and an anonymous reviewer improved the
manuscript.
Literature Cited
Bain, R. H., A. Lathrop, R. W. Murphy, N. L. Orlov, and
Ho Thu Cue. 2003. Cryptic species of a cascade
frog from Southeast Asia: taxonomic revisions and
descriptions of six new species. American Museum
Novitates 3417:1-60.
Bossuyt, F. and A. Dubois. 2001. A review of the frog
genus Philautus Gistel, 1848 (Amphibia, Anura,
Ranidae, Rhacophorinae). Zeylanica 6(1): 1-1 12.
Bourret, R. 1942. Les batraciens de l’lndochine.
Memoires de Flnstitut Oceanographique de
flndochine 6:1-547.
Dring, J. 1987. Bornean treefrogs of the genus Philautus
(Rhacophoridae). Amphibia-Reptilia 8(1987): 19-
47.
Fei, L. 1999. Atlas of Amphibians of China. Zhengzhou:
Henan Publishing House of Science and
Technology. 432 pages, [in Chinese].
Frost, D. R. 2002. Amphibian Species of the World: an
online reference. Version 2.21 (15 July 2002).
Electronic database available at
http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/
index.html.
Inger, R. F. and M. Kottelat. 1998. A new species of
ranid frog from Laos. The Raffles Bulletin of
Zoology 46(l):29-34.
Inger, R. F., N. Orlov & I. Darevsky. 1999. Frogs of
Vietnam: a report on new collections. Fieldiana,
Zoology New Series, 92:1-46.
Liem, S. S. 1970. The morphology, systematics, and
evolution of the Old World treefrogs
(Rhacophoridae and Hyperoliidae). Fieldiana
Zoology 57:1-145.
Orlov, N. L., R. W. Murphy, N. B. Ananjeva, S. A.
Ryabov, & Ho Thu Cue. 2002. Herpetofauna of
Vietnam, a checklist. Part I. Amphibia. Russian
Journal of Herpetology 9(2):8 1-104.
Stuart, B. L. and T. J. Papenfuss. 2002. A new salaman-
der of the genus Paramesotriton (Caudata:
Salamandridae) from Laos. Journal of Herpetology
36(2): 145-148.
'004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 21
raylor, E. H. 1962. The amphibian fauna of Thailand.
University of Kansas Science Bulletin 63(8): 265-
599.
Wilkinson, J. A., R. C. Drewes, and O. L. Tatum. 2002.
A molecular phylogenetic analysis of the family
Rhacophoridae with an emphasis on the Asian and
African genera. Molecular Phylogenetics and
Evolution 24: 265-273.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, pp. 22-27~|
Rediscovery of the Philippine Forest Turtle, Heosemys leytensis
(Chelonia; Bataguridae), from Palawan Island, Philippines
Arvin C. Diesmos1’2’3, Genevieve V. A. Gee3, Mae L. Diesmos3’ 4, Rafe M. Brown2’3’5,
Peter J. Widmann3’6, and Judeline C. Dimalibot7
1 National Museum of the Philippines, Padre Burgos Avenue, Ermita 1000, Manila, Philippines;
Current address: Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore,
Block S3 14 Science, Drive 4, Singapore 117543; E-mail: kaloula@i-manila.com. ph
- Angelo King Center for Research and Environment Management; Marine Laboratory,
Silliman University, Bantayan, Dumaguete City, Negros Oriental, Philippines 6200.
J Wildlife Conservation Society of the Philippines, Room 106 Institute of Biology, University of the Philippines,
Diliman 1101, Quezon City, Philippines; E-mail: jutisha@yahoo.com
4 Department of Biological Sciences, College of Science, University of Santo Tomas
Espaha, Manila; E-mail: msleonida@lycos.com
5 Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin Texas, 78712;
Current address: Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 3101 Valley Life Science Building,
University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; Email: rafe@mail.utexas.edu
^ KATALA Foundation, Jacana Road, Bancao-Bancao, PO. Box 390, Puerto Princesa City 5300,
Palawan, Philippines; E-mail: widpeter@yahoo.com
7 Palawan Council for Sustainable Development, Sta Monica, Puerto Princesa City 5300,
Palawan, Philippines.
Abstract. - We report new observations from natural populations of the critically endangered Philippine forest turtle,
Heosemys leytensis. Previously known from two cotypes (reportedly from Leyte Island) that were destroyed during
World War II, a lone specimen in a U.S. collection, and a specimen purchased on Palawan Island in the late 1980s,
its status in the wild has been uncertain since its discovery. Our recent surveys of Palawan and nearby Dumaran
islands have documented natural populations that are under immediate threat due to over-harvesting and loss of habi-
tat. Records of captive animals and interviews with residents from these islands suggest that this species is heavily
exploited for food, pet trade, and ornamental fish pond curiosities. There is an urgent need to establish a conservation
program to study and protect remaining natural populations.
Heosemys leytensis, Asian freshwater turtles, turtle trade, Philippine forest turtle, Palawan Island,
Key words. -
Philippines.
Introduction
Taylor (1920) described the Philippine forest turtle,
Heosemys leytensis, on the basis of two specimens that
were collected by Gregorio Lopez. These specimens
were reportedly collected from a swamp at the
Municipality of Cabalian, southern Leyte Province,
Leyte Island, Philippines (Fig. 1). The cotypes (a male
and a female) were eventually deposited in the
Philippine Bureau of Science (Taylor, 1944) but were
destroyed during the World War II firebombing of
Manila (Brown and Alcala, 1978; Buskirk, 1989).
Between Taylor’s (1920) description and the late
1980s, no additional specimens or information became
available for this species, although its status as a valid
species has never been challenged (e.g., Pritchard, 1979;
Ernst and Barbour, 1989; Iverson, 1992). In 1988,
Timmerman and Auth reported on a specimen purchased
from a local resident of the Municipality of Taytay,
northern Palawan Island (Fig. 1). Buskirk (1989)
described a neotype for the species (CAS 60930) based
on a single specimen also reportedly from Cabalian,
Leyte.
Since these reports, numerous herpetologists,
including us, have searched for H. leytensis at Cabalian,
Leyte (Fig. 1) without success. The apparent rarity of the
species formed the basis of its listing under CITES
Appendix II and by IUCN as a Critically Endangered
species (Hilton-Taylor, 2000). Chelonian biologists
questioned whether the species was really rare or just
unstudied, extinct or extirpated, and whether the speci-
men reported by Timmerman and Auth (1988) was from
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 23
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Figure 1 . - Map of Palawan Island group in relation to the
Philippines (inset) and Leyte Island. The type locality
(Taylor, 1920) of H. leytensis is indicated with a star;
recent trade or captive animal locations include (1)
Brooke’s Point, (2) Rizal, (3) Aborlan, and (4) Puerto
Princesa and known natural populations include (5)
Taytay, and (6) Dumaran Island.
a natural population on Palawan or the result of interis-
land trade (Ernst and Barbour, 1989; Iverson, 1992; Das,
1995; Gaulke, 1995). The question remained whether H.
leytensis occurred on Leyte Island or whether the origi-
nal type locality data were in error.
In late 2001, as part of a comprehensive status
assessment of Palawan’s endemic amphibians and rep-
tiles, we began a survey of forested sites throughout the
island. We soon became aware of three nonmarine tur-
tle species present in some local wet markets and in the
possession of local wildlife traders. Two species Cuora
amboinensis and Cyclemys dental a , are common on
Palawan (Taylor, 1920; Alcala, 1986; Gaulke and Fritz,
1998; Widmann, 1998; ACD and RMB, pers. obs.). A
third species, frequent in the wildlife and food trade, was
identified as Taylor’s (1920) Heosemys leytensis.
New observations. - The live specimens we examined
match published descriptions of H. leytensis (Taylor,
1920; Buskirk, 1989; Ernst and Barbour, 1989): cara-
pace unkeeled except for posterior vertebrals; vertebrals
broader than long; anterior marginals projecting beyond
cervicals, rendering anterior rim from slightly to strong-
ly serrated; plastron much smaller than carapace, nar-
Figure 2. - Live H. leytensis from natural population on
Dumaran Island, northern Palawan: (A) An individual of
undetermined sex in a small stream on Dumaran Island;
(B) close up of the head.
rowing anteriorly and posteriorly; angular notch
between gulars deep and distinct; notch between gulars
and humerals present, less distinct; anal notch deep and
circular; three to four enlarged transverse scales present
on anterior side of each foreleg; coloration rusty brown
with darker margins on anterior scutes; narrow7 white to
pale yellow line crosses head just behind auricular open-
ings, medially divided in some specimens (Figs. 2-5). A
full technical redescription of the morphology of H.
leytensis will be published elsewhere (Diesmos et al..
unpublished data).
We located captive animals for sale in markets at
the Municipalities of Brookes Point, Aborlan, Rizal.
Puerto Princesa City, and Taytay (Fig. 1). The animals
were for sale as pets, ornamental fish pond curiosities,
and for food. Additionally, H. leytensis individuals were
found in public restaurants in the capital city' of Puerto
Princesa (Fig. 4b). In many areas, residents expressed
the belief that the keeping of pet H. leytensis specimens
brings the owner good luck.
We found natural populations in the vicinity' of Lake
Manguao, Municipality of Taytay, Palawan Island and
on Dumaran Island (Fig. 2). Exact localities are not
given to protect these populations. Several individuals
of each natural population were observed in slow-mov-
2004
Asiatic Herpeto/ogical Research
Vol. 10, p. 24
Figure 3. - (A) Dorsal view of carapace and (B) ventral
view of plastron of a subadult H. leytensis of underter-
mined sex (captive pet, reportedly wild-caught locally)
from Dumaran Island, N. Palawan.
ing streams, quiet side pools, and nearby disturbed
gallery forests (Fig. 4a), at most a few meters from the
water’s edge. Residents in these localities reported to us
that turtles are always located in the general vicinity of
water, but that they can be found many meters away
from water as well. Residents also report that H. leyten-
sis burrows in stream banks and retreats under large
nearby limestone boulders in the dry season when
streambeds run dry.
Interviews with Tagbanwa tribe members in the
Municipality of Taytay suggest that in some areas this
species is fairly common. Reports of natural popula-
tions in the southern localities of Rizal and Brookes
Point will need to be confirmed. In these areas inter-
viewed persons claimed that H. leytensis was present in
nearby forests but we were unable to locate wild animals
ourselves.
Discussion
Our recent field observations confirm that H. leytensis
occurs naturally on Palawan and at least on one of its
northern satellite islands. Despite numerous surveys of
suitable habitat at Cabalian, Leyte conducted by E.
Figure 4. - (A) Preferred stream habitat of H. leytensis
from Dumaran Island, northern Palawan; (B) Heosemys
leytensis , Cuora amboinensis , and Cyclemys dentata
specimens alive in captivity in restaurant of Puerto
Princesa City, Palawan Island.
Taylor, A. Alcala, and ourselves, no additional specimens
of H. leytensis have been collected there. Interviews
with residents in the vicinity of Cabalian, have failed to
find verbal accounts of fresh-water turtles that fit the
description of H. leytensis. We suspect that the species
does not and never has naturally occurred on Leyte. We
prefer the use of the common name “Philippine forest
turtle” given that we have only observed animals in rem-
nant old-growth forests and our sense is that this species
is forest dependent.
It is possible that Taylor or Lopez mislabeled or oth-
erwise confused locality information assigned to the
original co-types on Leyte and the third specimen at
CAS (Buskirk, 1989). Taylor (1920) also reported
Cyclemys dentata from Cabalian, Leyte (see also
Iverson, 1992). This species has not since been reported
from Leyte and is otherwise restricted in the Philippines
to Palawan and the Sulu archipelago (Fig. 1; Taylor.
1920; Gaulke, 1995; Gaulke and Fritz, 1998). The fact
that another conspicuous Palawan turtle species was
reported at the same time and from the same site on
Leyte (Taylor, 1920) suggests that a group of specimens
from Palawan were mixed into collections from Leyte or
Vol. 10, p. 25
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Figure 5. - A live Heosemys leytensis from the Municipality of Taytay, northern Palawan Island, Philippines.
Watercolors by Mr. Rene Aquino.
were mislabeled. Based on information from the CAS
herpetological registry, it is clear that G. Lopez also col-
lected on Coron and Busuanga (Fig. 1) which would
appear to be a likely source of the presumably erroneous
“Leyte” specimens of C. dentata and H. leytensis. Thus,
we suspect that a locality error is the basis of the specif-
ic epithet and the long-held belief that H. leytensis natu-
rally inhabits the island of Leyte. Whether H. leytensis
has ever been introduced outside of Palawan or the
country, remains to be documented.
Finally, given the geological history and the
Pleistocene formation of isolated paleoislands in the
Philippines (Heaney, 1985; Hall, 1996, 1998) it is not
surprising that H. leytensis may be restricted to Palawan
and satellite islands. Based on available information
from other groups of Philippine endemics, it is some-
what rare for a species to be shared between both the
Palawan (Palawan + Busuanga + Coron + Culion +
Dumaran) and the Mindanao (Mindanao+BohoI+Leyte+
Samar) Pleistocene Aggregate Island Complexes
(PAlCs). That is, based on previously-elucidated pat-
terns of biogeography (Brown and Alcala, 1970; Brown
and Diesmos, 2001; Brown and Guttman, 2002; Evans
et al., 2003), we would expect to find Philippine
endemics with restricted distributions on the Palawan
PAIC or the Mindanao PAIC, but not necessarily both.
There are some exceptions to these apparent trends, but
they appear to be rare and limited to non-endemic wide-
spread species that are also shared with the islands of the
Sunda Shelf (Borneo, Java, Sumatra, etc.), or wide-
spread Philippine endemics that are also found through-
out the rest of the archipelago (Inger, 1954; Alcala and
Brown, 1998; Brown and Alcala, 1970, 1978. 1980)
Recommendations. - We recommend that an immediate
exhaustive survey of the Palawan PAIC (including
Balabac, Coron, Busuanga, Culion, and Dumaran) be
undertaken to determine the status of natural H. leyten-
sis populations. Basic knowledge of the species' distri-
bution. habitat requirements, and natural population size
will be a necessary requirement for designing effective
conservation strategies. To combat illegal hobbyist, con-
sumptive, and/or medicinal trade, wildlife managers will
need to have reasonable estimates of numbers of animals
2004
Asiatic Herpeto/ogical Research
Vol. 10, p. 26
Table 1 . - Standard measurements of H. leytensis speci-
mens from captivity (Nos. 1-20) and a natural population
(Nos. 21-24; Dumaran Isl ). Carapace Length and Width
are straight-line distances; Carapace Width measured at
widest point; Tail Length measured from posterior edge
of cloaca to tip of tail. Sex undetermined; all measure-
ments are in mm.
being illegally harvested. Legislative protection of the
species will need to be adjusted to recognize its current
known distribution on Palawan and not Leyte. We
expect that a specific conservation strategy will be nec-
essary to protect this species from unchecked exploita-
tion. The fact that the entirety of Palawan is officially
designated a national protected area provides some
assurance, but we suspect additional measures will need
to be undertaken to protect this species while promoting
its study. The legal “Protected Area” status of Palawan
Island clearly is not deterring local exploitation of this
species. Local education programs and public awareness
campaigns targeting both the general public and local
environmental authorities may be the key to insuring
that H. leytensis does not become another casualty of the
“Asian turtle crisis” (van Dijk et al., 2000). Many basic
questions regarding the distribution, demography, ecolo-
gy, reproductive biology, and phylogenetic affinities of
H. leytensis remain to be answered.
Acknowledgments
This publication is a contribution of HerpWatch
Palawan 2001, a project funded by the BP Conservation
Programme (Silver Award No. 1554). ACD, MLD,
GVAG, and JCD wish to thank their former institutions
for supporting this work: De La Salle University-
Dasmarinas, Haribon Foundation, and Palawan State
University. The Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau of
the Philippine Department of Environment and Natural
Resources and the Palawan Council for Sustainable
Development facilitated research permits. We especially
thank Althea Lota, Anson Tagtag, Marlynn Mendoza,
Carlo Custodio, Mundita Lim, Wilfrido Pollisco, Linda
Bacosa, Joselito Alisuag, Adelwisa Sandalo, and Rene
Villegas. Indira Widmann, Siegfred Diaz, Deborah
Villafuerte, Rolito Dumalag (Philippine Cockatoo
Conservation Project), and Sabine Schoppe (State
Polytechnic College of Palawan) extended much appre-
ciated assistance and shared relevant information. We
thank C. R. Infante for help during initial field survey
work on Palawan and I. Das and M. Gaulke for provid-
ing some critical reference material. We thank James
Parham (University of California, Berkeley) and Bryan
Stuart (Field Museum, Chicago) for providing refer-
ences and for applying just the right amount of pressure
to help us finish this report, and we thank Greg Pauly,
Jen Weghorst, George Zug, and Bryan Stuart for critical
reviews of earlier drafts of the manuscript. Special
thanks are due to Rene Aquino (National Museum of the
Philippines) for use of his painting of H. leytensis in life.
Literature Cited
Alcala, A. C. 1986. Guide to Philippine Flora and Fauna.
Vol. X, Amphibians and Reptiles. Natural Resource
Management Center, Ministry of Natural Resources
and the University of the Philippines, Manila,
Philippines.
Alcala, A. C., and W. C. Brown. 1998. Philippine
Amphibians: an Illustrated Field Guide. Bookmark
Press, Makati City, Philippines.
Brown, R. M„ and A. C. Diesmos. 2001. Application of
lineage-based species concepts to oceanic island
frog populations: the effects of differing taxonomic
philosophies on the estimation of Philippine biodi-
veristy. The Silliman Journal 42:133-162.
Brown, R. M., and S. I. Guttman. 2002. Phylogenetic
systematic of the Rana signata complex of
Philippine and Bornean stream frogs; reconsidera-
Vol. 10, p. 27
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
tion ot Huxley’s modification of Wallace’s Lme at
the Oriental-Australian faunal zone interface.
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 76:393-
461.
Brown, W. C., and A. C. Alcala. 1970. The zoogeogra-
phy of the Philippine Islands, a fringing archipela-
go. Proceedings of the California Academy of
Science 38:105-130.
Brown, W. C., and A. C. Alcala. 1978. Philippine
Lizards of the Family Gekkonidae. Silliman
University Press, Dumaguete City, Philippines.
Brown, W. C., and A. C. Alcala. 1980. Philippine
Lizards of the Family Scincidae. Silliman
University Press, Dumaguete City, Philippines.
Buskirk, J. R. 1989. A third specimen and neotype of
Heosemys leytensis (Chelonia: Emydidae). Copeia
1989:224-227.
Das, I. 1995. Status of knowledge on the biology and
conservation of non-marine turtles of the
Philippines. International Congress of Chelonian
Conservation, Gonfaron, France.
Ernst, C., H., and R. W. Barbour. 1989. Turtles of the
world. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington,
DC.
Evans, B. J., R. M. Brown, J. A. McGuire, J. Supriatna,
N. Andayani, A. C. Diesmos, D. Iskandar, D. J.
Melnick, and D. C. Cannatella. 2003.
Phylogenetics of fanged frogs: testing biogeograph-
ical hypotheses at the interface of the Asian and
Australian faunal zones. Systematic Biology
52:794-819.
Gaulke, M., 1995. On the distribution of emydid turtles
and the anuran genus Microhyla in the Philippines.
Asiatic Herpetological Research 6: 49-52.
Gaulke, M. and U. Fritz. 1998. Distribution patterns of
batagurid turtles in the Philippines. Herpetozoa
11:3-12.
Hall, R. 1996. Reconstructing Cenozoic SE Asia. Pp.
153-184 In: Tectonic evolution of southeast Asia.
Hall, R., and D. Blundell (eds). Geological Society,
London.
Hall, R. 1998. The plate tectonics of Cenozoic SE Asia
and the distribution of land and sea. Pp 99-132 In:
Biogeography and geological evolution of southeast
Asia Hall, R., and J. D. Holloway (eds). Brackhuys,
Leiden.
Heaney, L. R. 1985. Zoogeographic evidence for middle
and late Pleistocene land bridges to the Philippines.
Modern Quaternary Research of SE Asia 9:127-
143.
Hilton-Taylor, C. (Compiler) 2000. 2000 1UCN Red List
of Threatened Species. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland
and Cambridge.
Inger, R. F. 1954. Systematics and zoogeography of
Philippine Amphibia. Fieldiana 33:181 -53 1 .
Iverson, J. B. 1992. A revised checklist with distribution
maps of the turtles of the world. Privately pub-
lished, Richmond, IN.
Pritchard, P. C. H. 1979. Encyclopedia of turtles. TFH
Publications, Neptune, NJ.
Taylor, E. H. 1920. Philippine turtles. Philippine Journal
of Science 16:111-144.
Taylor, E. H. 1944. Present location of certain herpeto-
logical and other type specimens. University of
Kansas Science Bulletin 30, No. 11:160
Timmerman, W. W., and D. L. Auth. 1988. Geographic
distribution: Heosemys leytensis. Herpetological
Review 19:21.
van Dijk, P. P., B. L. Stuart, and A. G. J. Rhodin. 2000.
Asian Turtle Trade. Proceedings of a Workshop on
Conservation and Trade of Freshwater Turtles and
Tortoises in Asia. Chelonian Research Monographs,
2.
Widmann, P. 1998. A Guide to the Ecosystems of
Palawan Philippines. ViSCA-GTZ and Times
Edition, Singapore.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, pp. 28-37
Molecular Systematics of Old World Stripe-Necked
Turtles (Testudines: Mauremys)
Chris R. Feldman1’* and James F. Parham2’3
1 Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT, 84322-5305, USA,
* Corresponding Author E-mail: elgaria@biology.usu.edu.
"Evolutionary Genomics Department, Joint Genome Institute, 2800 Mitchell Drive,
Walnut Creek, CA, 94598, USA.
University of California Museum of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720-3140, USA,
E-mail: parham@socrates. berkeley. edu
Abstract. - Nine extant species of Mauremys (including Ocadia and Chinemys) represent a geographically widespread
yet morphologically and ecologically conservative group of batagurid turtles. Here we examine the evolutionary rela-
tionships of Mauremys using 1539 base pairs of mitochondrial DNA encoding portions of COI, ND4, and three adja-
cent tRNA genes. These data contain 246 parsimony informative characters that we use to erect hypotheses of rela-
tionships for Mauremys. Both maximum parsimony and Bayesian methods suggest that Mauremys japonica, M.
sinensis , M. nigricans , and M. reevesii form a well-supported monophyletic clade, as do M. mutica and M. annamen-
sis. Furthermore, our analyses show that M. mutica is paraphyletic with respect to M. annamensis. The western taxa
M. leprosa, M. caspica, and M. rivulata remain problematic and do not form a monophyletic group sister to the Asian
taxa. Nevertheless, an east-west biogeographic hypothesis cannot be discounted with our molecular genetic data.
Key words. - Turtles, Bataguridae, Mauremys, molecular phylogenetics, mitochondrial DNA
Introduction
The Old World turtle genus Mauremys is represented by
morphologically and ecologically conservative species
that are diagnosed by a rigid plastron and a striped head
and neck. These semi-aquatic, batagurid (= geoemydid,
see Joyce et al., in press) turtles occupy lotic and lentic
environments in both forested and arid habitats through-
out Asia and the Mediterranean.
The genus contains some of the most commercially
important freshwater turtles in Asia. For example, M.
mutica is one of the most commonly reared and highly
traded chelonians in Asia (Lau and Shi, 2000). Other
Mauremys species have been at the center of a conserva-
tion and systematics controversy. In fact, two newly
described Mauremys may be polyphyletic hybrids
(Parham et al., 2001; Wink et al., 2001; Spinks et al.,
2004).
Given the mounting conservation interest in the tur-
tle fauna of Asia (van Dijk et al., 2000), understanding
the extant diversity and phylogenetic relationships
among the Bataguridae are areas of active research (Wu
et al., 1999; Honda et al., 2002b; Barth et al., 2004;
Spinks et al., 2004). The genus Mauremys has received
particular attention because of this recent conservation
crisis and taxonomic confusion. The first examination of
evolutionary relationships within Mauremys was a mor-
phological treatment of the genus based on shell and
scute measurements (Iverson and McCord, 1994).
Consistent with the disjunct distribution of Mauremys,
Iverson and McCord (1994) suggested that East Asian
taxa form a monophyletic group, sister to a
Mediterranean and Middle Eastern clade. A subsequent
study used 12S and 16S ribosomal genes to resolve the
phylogenetic relationships among species of Mauremys
(Honda et al., 2002a). In contrast to the east-west
hypothesis of Iverson and McCord (1994), Honda et al.
(2002a) suggested that the deepest phylogenetic splits
within Mauremys occur between Asian taxa. The ribo-
somal mtDNA data also cast doubt on the monophyly of
traditional Mauremys by including the east Asian
species, Chinemys reevesii, as the sister taxon to M.
japonica. Two recent studies examined more extensive
sequence data, predominantly cyt b mtDNA, as well as
a more comprehensive sampling of batagurids (Barth et
al., 2004; Spinks et al., 2004). Both studies firmly estab-
lished the placement of Mauremys within the
Bataguridae and show that the Chinemys and Ocadia are
phylogenetically nested within Mauremys (Barth et al.,
2004; Spinks et al., 2004). Barth et al. (2004) offer two
possible solutions to reconcile the paraphyly of
Mauremys: 1) split the species of Mauremys into four
genera; 2) lump Chinemys and Ocadia into an expanded
Mauremys. While Barth et al. (2004) refrain from a tax-
onomic decision, Spinks et al. (2004) adopt an expand-
ed Mauremys. We also endorse an inclusive Mauremys
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 29
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
because we consider expanding genera to well-support-
ed clades of species functionally preferable to proliferat-
ing monotypic genera based on subjective, typological
ideas of uniqueness (Feldman and Parham, 2002;
Parham and Feldman, 2002; Spinks et al., 2004).
Our objective here is to provide an independent esti-
mate of Mauremys phylogeny using different molecular
markers from other recent systematic investigations and
separate museum voucher specimens (Barth et al., 2004;
Spinks et al., 2004). We hope that our data help resolve
areas of uncertainty in the emerging consensus on
Mauremys systematics. In addition, our study will add to
the growing body of information on the evolutionary
history and diversity of Asia’s threatened batagurid
fauna (Wu et al., 1999; Honda et al., 2002b; Barth et al.,
2004; Spinks et al., 2004).
Materials and methods
Taxon sampling and laboratory protocols. - We
obtained liver tissue from 17 museum specimens repre-
senting nine currently recognized species of Mauremys
and three species of Cuora (Appendix 1). The nine
species of Mauremys used in our study include: M.
annamensis, M. caspica, M. japonica, M. leprosa, M.
mutica, M. nigricans , M. reevesii, M. rivulata, and M.
sinensis. We do not consider “M iversoni ”, “M
pritchardF, “O. glyphistoma ” or “0. philippenF to be
valid taxa because specimens matching these species (all
described from the pet trade) are likely hybrids (Parham
et al., 2001; Wink et al., 2001; Spinks et al., 2004). In
addition, we also excluded “M megalocephald’\ which
is probably a diet-induced variant of M. reevesii (Iverson
et al., 1989; Barth et al., 2002). However, we do include
a “M iversonF-Uke hybrid specimen described in
Parham and Shi (2001) because mtDNA from this
hybrid specimen is demonstrably Mauremys (Parham et
al., 2001). All vouchers correspond to well-documented
reference material and original species descriptions.
We isolated genomic DNA from tissue samples by
standard proteinase K digestion and phenol/chloroform
purification (Maniatis et al., 1982). We amplified 700 bp
of mtDNA encoding a section of COI via PCR (Saiki et
al., 1988) using primers HCO-2193 and LCO-1490
(Folmer et al., 1994). We amplified an additional 900 bp
region of mtDNA encoding a portion of ND4 and flank-
ing tRNA histidine (tRNAhis), serine (tRNAser), and part
of leucine (tRNAIeu) using primers ND4 and Leu
(Arevalo et al., 1994). We used the following thermal
cycle parameters for 50pl amplification reactions: 35
cycles of lmin denature at 94°C, lmin anneal at 45°C
(COI) or 52°C (ND4), and 2min extension at 72°C. We
purified PCR products using the Wizard Prep Mini
Column Purification Kit (Promega, Inc.) and used puri-
fied template in lOpl dideoxy chain-termination reac-
tions (Sanger et al., 1 977) using ABI Big Dye chemistry
(Applied Biosystems, Inc.) and the primers listed above.
Following an isopropanol/ethanol precipitation, we ran
cycle-sequenced products on a 4.8% Page Plus
(Ameresco) acrylamide gel using an ABI 377 automated
sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Inc.). We sequenced all
samples in both directions.
Sequence analyses. - We aligned DNA sequences with
the program Sequencher™ 4.1 (Gene Codes Corp.), and
translated protein coding nucleotide sequences into
amino acid sequences using MacClade 4.0 (Maddison
and Maddison, 2000). We identified tRNA genes by
manually reconstructing their secondary structures using
the criteria of Kumazawa and Nishida (1993). We
deposited all mitochondrial DNA sequences in GenBank
(Appendix 1).
We performed a partition homogeneity test (PH),
similar to the incongruence length differences test (ILD;
Farris et al., 1994), to determine whether the ND4 and
COI data could be combined. We used PAUP* 4.0b 10
(Swofford, 2002) to generate a null distribution of length
differences using 1000 same-sized, randomly generated
partitions from the original data with replacement.
To evaluate base substitution saturation at first, sec-
ond, and third codon positions, we plotted the uncorrect-
ed percent sequence divergence of transitions and trans-
versions versus the corrected maximum likelihood esti-
mates of divergence for each codon position.
Phylogenetic analyses. - We used maximum parsimony
(MP; Farris, 1983) and maximum likelihood-based
Bayesian (Larget and Simon, 1999) phylogenetic meth-
ods to infer evolutionary relationships among batagurid
species. We conducted MP analyses in PAUP* and
Bayesian analyses with MrBayes 3.0b4 (Huelsenbeck
and Ronquist, 2001). We polarized the phylogeny via
outgroup comparison (Maddison et al., 1984) using the
Asian box turtles Cuora mouhotii, Cuora picturata , and
Cuora trifasciata. Other molecular phylogenetic studies
suggest these turtles are appropriate outgroup taxa (Wu
et al., 1999; Honda et al., 2002b; Barth et al., 2004;
Spinks et al., 2004).
We executed MP analyses with the branch-and-
bound search algorithm (Hendy and Penny, 1982) using
equally weighted, unordered characters. To assess nodal
support, we used the bootstrap resampling method (BP;
Felsenstein, 1985) employing 1000 pseudoreplicates of
branch-and-bound searches in PAUP*. Additionally, we
calculated branch support (DI; Bremer, 1994) for all
nodes using the program Tree Rot 2c (Sorenson, 1999).
We performed Bayesian analyses to estimate branch
lengths and search for additional tree topologies. To
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 30
determine the most appropriate model of DNA substitu-
tion tor reconstructing Mauremys relationships under
the Bayesian method, we executed hierarchical likeli-
hood ratio tests (LRT; Felsenstein, 1993; Goldman,
1993; Yang, 1996) in the program Modeltest 3.06
(Posada and Crandall, 1998). Because MrBayes 3.0b4
can perform singular phylogenetic analyses using differ-
ent models of evolution, we performed two separate
LRTs on the two mtDNA regions. The model of
nucleotide substitution that best fit the COI data was the
HKY model (Hasegawa et al., 1985) in conjunction with
r (Yang, 1994a; 1994b), and I (Gu et al., 1995), while
the slightly less complex HKY + T model of DNA evo-
lution best fit the ND4 data. We then performed
Bayesian tree searches, allowing separate parameter
estimates under the two models of DNA substitution for
the COI and ND4 data partitions. We did not specify a
topology or nucleotide substitution model parameters a
priori. We ran Bayesian analyses for 3 x 10^ genera-
tions using the Metropolis-coupled Markov chain Monte
Carlo (MCMCMC) algorithm with four heated Markov
chains per generation, sampling trees every 100 genera-
tions. To determine when the Markov chains had con-
verged on stable likelihood values, we plotted the -lnl
scores against the number of generations (Huelsenbeck
and Ronquist, 2001). We then computed a 50 % major-
ity rule consensus tree after excluding those trees sam-
pled prior to the stable equilibrium. Nodal support is
given by the frequency of the recovered clade, which
corresponds to the posterior probability of that clade
under the given models of sequence evolution (PP;
Rannala and Yang, 1996; Huelsenbeck and Ronquist,
2001). Lastly, we performed three Bayesian runs to be
sure that independent analyses converged on similar log-
likelihood scores (Leache and Reeder, 2002).
Results
Genetic variation. - Sequences from the protein coding
regions appear functional and there are no gene
rearrangements in the data (Kumazawa and Nishida,
1995; Kumazawa et al., 1996; Macey and Verma, 1997;
Macey et al., 1997). However, ND4 in the batagurids
studied here appears truncated relative to that of emydid
turtles, which have three additional residues:
Phenylalanine, Tyrosine, and Cysteine (Feldman and
Parham, 2002). Instead, these batagurids possess a stop
codon, followed by a 12 bp stretch of highly polymor-
phic DNA between ND4 and tRNAhis. Additionally,
tRNAser has a short D-stem, instead of a D-arm replace-
ment loop like that of most metazoan taxa (Kumazawa
and Nishida, 1993). This unusual tRNA condition is also
seen in emydid turtles (Feldman and Parham, 2002).
The PH test shows that length difference between
the sum of the COI and ND4 trees and the combined
COI and ND4 trees is not significantly different from the
randomly generated test statistic ( P = 0.93). Therefore,
we combined the aligned DNA sequences for subse-
quent phylogenetic analyses.
Of the 1539 aligned nucleotides, 369 are variable
and 246 are parsimony informative. Among ingroup
taxa, 289 sites are variable and 205 parsimony informa-
tive. Of the 369 variable characters, 60 occur at 1st
codon positions, 15 at 2nd positions, 261 at 3rd positions,
and 33 in tRNAs. The scatter diagrams are linear and
show no evidence of multiple hit problems for transi-
tions or transversions (data not shown).
Phylogenetic relationships. - The branch-and-bound
equally weighted MP analysis produces a single most
parsimonious tree (L = 661; Cl = 0.626; RI = 0.683) that
is consistent with the model-based Bayesian analyses
(Fig. 1). All three Bayesian analyses converge on the
same topology and nearly identical mean log-likelihood
values, parameter estimates, and nodal support. Thus we
simply present results from the final search. The parti-
tioned HKY + T+ I and HKY + TBayesian analysis (3 x
10^ generations) attains stable log-likelihood values
within the first 15,000 generations, but we were conser-
vative and discarded the first 20,000 generations.
Because we sampled trees every 100 generations, we
discarded the first 200 trees and retained 29,800
Bayesian trees, which we used to generate a 50% major-
ity rule tree, and for which consensus values represent a
group’s posterior probability (Huelsenbeck and
Ronquist, 2001). The summary topology of the nearly
30,000 Bayesian trees (mean -lnl = 5205.5110, G2 =
24.5038; mean ti/tv (COI) = 10.8360; G2 = 10.6335;
mean a(COI) =0.5479, a2 = 0.8874; mean Pinvar (COI)
= 0.4163, O2 = 0.0291; mean ti/tv (ND4) = 12.3499; G2
= 9.0505; mean a(ND4) =0.2431, G2 = 0.0009) differs
from the MP tree in the placement of only one taxon
(Fig. 1).
In both analyses, species of Cuora unambiguously
group to the exclusion of Mauremys , (BP = 100%; DI =
19; PP = 100%). Mauremys japonica is a member of a
clade containing M. nigricans, M. reevesii and M. sinen-
sis (BP = 100%; DI = 13; PP = 100%), yet relationships
among these taxa are not well resolved, as indicated by
the low nodal support and conflict between MP and
Bayesian reconstructions. The MP tree places M. sinen-
sis sister to a group linking M. japonica , M. nigricans,
and M. reevesii (DI = 1), wherein M. nigricans and M.
reevesii form an additional clade (BP = 86%; DI = 5).
Alternatively, the Bayesian tree connects M. japonica to
M. sinensis (PP = 59%), sister to the M. nigricans the M.
reevesii clade (PP = 99%). The M. japonica , M. nigri-
cans, M. reevesii, and M. sinensis clade is sister to a
Mauremys leprosa (Morocco) I Mauremys leprosa (Morocco)
Vol. 10, p. 31
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
.2
'S3
cl
cn
a
to
S
5-
CO
S'
si
c
cd
<3
S'
2
co
f
2
si
a
■a
jE3
cd
cq
i
S'
<3
o
Co
S'
Si
si
I
CO
CO
5!
Co
s:
•IX*
co
co
!■
£
si
I
<3
•a
a
<3
■I
I
£
si
I
to
St
%>
S
to
S'
2
3
a
to
a
a
u
&
SS
co
S'
Si
a
a
cd
cd
cd
25 "O
3 C
3
o
£
£
cd
<d
•— ~o
C/5
L.
3 3
CL 4>
tS g
2 o-
£ Si
0) c/5
on
<d
co 3
<!
• CD
c/> o
<d ^
■4-* flj
O c/5
3 o
cr x
■4— >
c
t;
V) O
<d
<
Q
C/D
b
cd
£
<3 0Q
x>
3;
d
C/5
CD
_3
03
>
3
o
X
3
CL
a.
3
C/5
a. T3
3
3
<d , .
o O
" U • -
w _Q
is 3
c O
CL D-
3
u
+
>-
I
3
cd
<D
3-
r-
oo
co
+
u
+
>*
u
I
-a
CD
e
_o
d 11
cd z-'
« U
13
c
3
(N
b
c\
Os
r-
3"
vs
<d
c/5
o
CL
3
<D
C/5
<D
S—
CL
CD
C/5
<d
-o
o
3
on
3
_o
3
CD
X
a £
3
X)
3
cd
O
£
3
z
CS
o
o
o
> d
on ||
3 —
'5b *
*r • r
O
£>?
3 U
o . „
ux
• no
to
d II
co ,LT
0) VS
<d rs
iz on •
^ x> ®
§ 2
oo
II
<3
L.
a
I
C/D
<D
O
C3
£ £
On II
CN (N
3 t5
O . ~
"O §
8 2
cd 00
X> o
Os ~
3 II
CD
on o
•2°
P* >
os x
S ~
c^> 3
S 3
a <u
I
C/5 CD
CD
0) X
j= « <4-
o
oo
(3
•3 .5P
CD O
C £
<D >
on >,
o —
"C. 3
x' 3
£ cr
0)
_ ; 3
CD ®
= ^
on «2
■ — cd
Uh X
o
(D ^CS
3
£ ^
CN
b
cn
3"
^ oi
o o
ii s
on
S-
Q >
Z
n— ' CD
a x
CD
3 3
3 <D
cd on
£
o
CTi C/5
O w
VS 3
s £
O' *3
II V5
II CD
<N c
b 3
• Z' C/5
On <D
ON
3" ^
rn 03
CS o
II "£
^ 3
3" ,2
Q t
Z o
w CL
Table 1. Pairwise comparisons of mtDNA sequences among Mauremys and related taxa. Note: values above the diagonal indicate uncorrected pairwise differences (/o) while
those below the diagonal denote HKY +F+ I sequence divergences (%).
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 32
poorly supported M. mutica, M. armamensis, “M iver-
sonf\ M. leprosa, and M. caspica assemblage (DI = 2;
PP = 61%). Within this large group, M. mutica , M. anna-
mensis and “M iversonf form a strongly supported
clade (BP = 99; DI = 15; PP = 100%). In fact, inclusion
of both M. armamensis and “M iversoni ’ render M.
mutica paraphyletic; two M. mutica (ROM 25613,
25614) are more closely related to M. annamensis and
“M iverson F than they are to a Chinese M. mutica
(MVZ 230476) (BP = 100%; DI = 36; PP = 100%).
Within this “ mutica complex”, M. annamensis and “M
iversonr are weakly allied (BP = 60%; DI = 1 ; PP = 86).
This entire Umutica complex” is then sister to a weakly
supported M. leprosa and M. caspica clade (DI = 1).
Finally, both MP and Bayesian analyses suggest that M
rivulata is sister to a monophyletic clade containing the
rest of Mauremys, but this phylogenetic arrangement
receives almost no statistical support (DI = 2; PP =
60%).
Phylogenetic relationships. - Both MP and Bayesian
phylogenetic methods show that M. japonica is a mem-
ber of a clade containing M. nigricans, M. reevesii, and
M. sinensis, exclusive of other Mauremys. The M.
japonica, M. nigricans, M. reevesii, and M. sinensis
clade is joined to a poorly supported M. mutica, M.
annamensis, M. leprosa, and M. caspica assemblage.
Within this grouping, M. mutica and M. annamensis
form a solid clade, congruent with shell and scute data
(Iverson and McCord, 1994), other molecular data
(Barth et al., 2004; Spinks et al., 2004) but not 12S and
16S mtDNA data (Honda et ah, 2002a). Our analyses
further suggest that M. mutica is paraphyletic. Two M.
mutica (ROM 25613, 25614) purchased in Vietnam are
more closely related to M. annamensis than they are to
topotypic M. mutica (MVZ 230476) from China. We
tested the paraphyly of M. mutica by constraining the
MP searches to recover only those trees that produce a
monophyletic M. mutica. The shortest two trees generat-
ed by the constraint search are 697 steps long (Cl =
0.594; RI = 0.636), 36 steps longer than the uncon-
strained MP tree. The two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-ranks
test (Templeton, 1983) fails to support (P < 0.0001) the
monophyly of M. mutica. The mutica complex is linked
to a tenuous M. leprosa and M. caspica group. Lastly,
both MP and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses tentatively
place M. rivulata sister to a monophyletic clade contain-
ing the remaining ingroup taxa.
Genetic Variation. - Our samples of M. leprosa from
Spain and Morocco, and M. caspica from Iran and
Bahrain, show no intraspecific haplotype diversity
Discussion
Vol. 10, p. 33
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
(Table 1), yet exhibit sizeable morphological variation
(Busack and Ernst, 1980). This discrepancy between
intraspecific mtDNA diversity and geographic variation
seems to be common among turtles (e.g., Lenk et al.,
1999; Starkey et ah, 2003) and may be related to exten-
sive phenotypic plasticity or the slow rate of molecular
evolution in turtles (Avise et ah, 1992; Lamb et ah,
1994).
In contrast, most interspecific mtDNA variation
appears extensive, with uncorrected sequence diver-
gences higher than 8% between a number of ingroup
taxa (Table 1). Additionally, the mitochondrial sequence
divergences between M. rivulata and M. caspica (Table
1), formerly considered conspecifics (Fritz and Wischuf,
1997), are equivalent to or greater than the genetic dis-
tances observed between other congeneric emydid and
batagurid turtles (e.g., Feldman and Parham, 2002;
Starkey et ah, 2003; Stuart and Parham, 2004). Hence,
these mtDNA data, together with the differing shell mor-
phologies, distinct color patterns, and unique habitat
preferences of M. rivulata and M. caspica (Busack and
Ernst, 1980), support the recent elevation of M. rivulata
as a distinct evolutionary lineage independent of M.
caspica (Fritz and Wischuf, 1997).
Mauremys annamensis, a robust batagurid endemic
to central Vietnam, is characterized by extensive axillary
buttresses, a massive bridge, a slightly tricarinate and
high-domed shell, a vividly striped head and neck, and
reverse sexual size-dimorphism (McDowell, 1964;
Iverson and McCord, 1994). The taxon is so distinctive
it was once placed into its own genus, Annamemys
Bourret 1939. McDowell (1964) originally demonstrat-
ed that M annamensis and M. mutica share a number of
derived features and Iverson and McCord (1994) subse-
quently confirmed a close kinship between these taxa
with shell measurements. Hence, the close relationship
revealed by our mitochondrial genes is not novel. What
is surprising, however, is that M. annamensis differs
from Vietnamese M. mutica and our “M iverson?'- like
hybrid by only two transitions. Furthermore, this clade
shows a roughly 6% uncorrected sequence divergence
from topotypic M. mutica from Zoushan Island,
Zheijung Province, eastern China. In contrast, distantly
collected samples of M. leprosa and M. caspica show no
such intraspecific mtDNA variation (Table 1). These
data question our ideas of species limits within
Mauremys. Is M. annamensis a distinct species? Does
M. mutica represent multiple species?
Several potential hypotheses might account for
these unexpected results. M annamensis may simply
represent a recent species, derived from M. mutica , or
even a geographical variant of M. mutica. The dramatic
morphological differences exhibited by M. annamensis
could reflect intense selection and rapid phenotypic evo-
lution while the minute mitochondrial divergences and
paraphyly represent the nature of speciation and unsort-
ed polymorphism. Alternatively, there may be historical
or ongoing introgression between M. annamensis and
Vietnamese M. mutica , perhaps facilitated by selection.
Two additional hypotheses involve the possibility
of hybridization. While our specimen of M. annamensis
conforms to the species description, it was acquired
from a Chinese turtle farm (Appendix 1) where M. anna-
mensis and M. mutica are reared together in large num-
bers (J.F. Parham, pers. obs.). Hence, our M. annamen-
sis could be a captive hybrid between M. annamensis
and M. mutica , though we find no morphological char-
acters supporting this notion. Ideally, we would examine
the morphology and compare the sequences of a wild-
caught M. annamensis to our sample, but to our knowl-
edge, no tissued, field-collected vouchers of M. anna-
mensis exist in collections; all modern museum speci-
mens of M. annamensis have been obtained from either
animal markets or the pet trade.
Another possibility is that the Vietnamese M. muti-
ca could be hybrid offspring of female M. annamensis
and male M. mutica, accounting for the scant mtDNA
differences between Vietnamese M. mutica and M.
annamensis and the sizeable divergences between these
samples and topotypic M. mutica. Although the
“Vietnamese M. mutica ” are phenotypically similar to
typical M. mutica, their darker coloration is evocative of
M. annamensis. Both Barth et al. (2004) and Spinks et
al. (2004) found substantial mitochondrial variation
between M. mutica and M. annamensis, but we do not
know the provenance or morphology of their samples.
The hybridization of batagurid turtles has lead to
other cases of taxonomic confusion (Parham and Shi,
2001; Parham et al., 2001; Shi and Parham, 2001; Wink
et al., 2001; Spinks et al., 2004) and cannot be discount-
ed here. Unfortunately, our small sample size prohibits
us from effectively evaluating these hypotheses. Clearly
a more detailed genetic study is needed to unravel this
problem. With our present knowledge, any change in
conservation policies for M. annamensis, one of the
world’s most poorly known turtles, would be premature.
Biogeography. - The distribution of Mauremys is char-
acterized by a major break between the Zagros
Mountains of western Iran (easternmost M. caspica ) and
the Annamite Mountains of central Vietnam (range of M.
annamensis). This disjunction includes the entire Indian
subcontinent (home to a diverse, endemic batagurid
fauna), and the inhospitable Tibetan plateau. We suggest
that the collision of India into Asia may be the vicariant
event responsible for the current distribution of
Mauremys, as proposed for anguine lizards (Macey et
al., 1999). Molecular data are ambiguous on this point.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 34
Given that neither eastern nor western species assem-
blages appear monophyletic (though a Wilcoxon signed
ranks test topology test cannot discount this hypothesis
[P = 0.35]), the current divergences between the living
species may have occurred before the development of
the Indo-Tibetan gap. The collision and subsequent
uplift of the Tibetan plateau took place in multiple stages
between 50 and 10 MYBP (Shackleton and Chang,
1988; Dewey et al., 1989; Windley, 1988). Hervet
(2004) attributed some Paleogene (>50 MYBP)
European fossils to the stem of Mauremys , but did not
investigate their relations to east Asian Mauremys. In
addition to employing additional molecular markers to
vouchered museum specimens, the integration of all
extant Mauremys into analyses of morphological charac-
ters and fossil taxa will be necessary to unravel the his-
torical biogeography of this clade of turtles.
Acknowledgments
We thank T. J. Papenfuss, C. Cicero, and D. B. Wake
(MVZ), and R. W. Murphy (ROM) for kindly contribut-
ing specimens and tissues essential to this project. We
are grateful to M. E. Pffender and P. G. Wolf for gener-
ously providing laboratory space, and D. G. Mulcahy
and W. B. Simison for much needed lab assistance. We
appreciate helpful discussions about phylogenetic meth-
ods from E. M. O’Neill, A. D. Leache, and F. T.
Burbrink, and useful comments on this manuscript from
M. D. Matocq, J. R. Mendelson III, E. D. Brodie Jr., H.
B. Shaffer, and two anonymous reviewers. We also
thank P. Q. Spinks and U. Fritz for sharing unpublished
data. Finally, we thank K. Padian and T. J. Papenfuss for
funding, space, advice, and encouragement. This is
University of California Museum of Paleontology
Contribution #1826 and LBNL #54656. This research
was performed under the auspices of the U.S.
Department of Energy, Office of Biological and
Environmental Research.
References
Arevalo, E., S. K. Davis and J. W. Sites. 1994.
Mitochondrial DNA sequence divergence and phy-
logenetic relationships among eight chromosome
races of the Sceloporus grammicus complex
(Phrynosomatidae) in central Mexico. Systematic
Biology 43: 387-418.
Avise, J. C., B. W. Bowen, T. Lamb, A. B. Meylan and
E. Bermingham. 1992. Mitochondrial DNA evolu-
tion at a turtle’s pace: evidence for low genetic vari-
ability and reduced microevolutionary rate in the
Testudines. Molecular Biology and Evolution 9:
457-473.
Barth, D., D. Bernhard, D. Guicking, D. Stock and U.
Fritz. 2002. Is Chinemys megalocephala Fang, 1934
a valid species? New insights based on mitochondr-
ial DNA sequence data. Salamandra 38: 233-244.
Barth, D., D. Bernhard, G. Fritzsch and U. Fritz. 2004.
The freshwater turtle genus Mauremys (Testudines,
Geoemydidae) - a textbook example of an
east-west disjunction or a taxonomic misconcept?
Zoologica Scripta. In press.
Bourret, R. 1939. Notes herpetologiques sur l’lndochine
Fran^aise, XVIII. Reptiles et batraciens re?us au
Laboratoire des Science Naturelles de l’Universite
au cours de l’annee 1939, Descriptions de quatre
especies et d’une variete nouvelles. Bulletin
General de l’lnstruction Publique Hanoi 1939: 5-39.
Bremer, K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability.
Cladistics 10: 295-304.
Busack, S. D. and C. H. Ernst. 1980. Variation in the
Mediterranean populations of Mauremys Gray 1 869
(Reptilia, Testudines, Emydidae). Annals of
Carnegie Museum 49: 251-264.
Dewey, J. F., S. Cande and W. C. Pittman III. 1989.
Tectonic evolution of the India/Eurasia collision
zone. Eclogae Geologicae Helveticae 82(3): 717-
734.
Farris, J. S. 1983. The logical basis of phylogenetic
analysis. In N. Platnick and V. A. Funk (eds), The
logical basis of phylogenetic analysis. Columbia
University Press, New York, NY, pp. 7-36.
Farris, J. S., M. Kallersjo, A. G. Kluge and C. Bult. 1994.
Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10:
315-319.
Feldman, C. R. and J. F. Parham. 2002. Molecular phy-
logenetics of emydine turtles: taxonomic revision
and the evolution of shell kinesis. Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution 22: 388-398.
Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies:
an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-
791.
Felsenstein, J. 1993. PHYLIP (Phylogentic Inference
Package). Ver. 3.5c. Department of Genetics,
University of Washington.
Vol. 10, p. 35
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Folmer, O., M. Black, W. Hoeh, R. Lutz and R.
Vrijenhoek. 1994. DNA primers for amplification
of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I
from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular
Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3: 294-299.
Fritz, U. and T. Wischuf. 1997. Zur systematic westasi-
atisch-siidosteropaischer Bachschilkroten (Gattung
Mauremys ) (Reptilia: Testudines: Bataguridae).
Zoologische Abhandlungen, Staatliches Museum
fur Tierkunde Dresden 49: 223-260.
Goldman, N. 1993. Statistical tests of models of DNA
substitution. Journal of Molecular Evolution 63:
182-198.
Gu, X., Y. Fu and W.-H. Li. 1995. Maximum likelihood
estimation of the heterogeneity of substitution rate
among nucleotide sites. Molecular Biology and
Evolution 12: 546-557.
Hasegawa, M., K. Kishino and T. Yano. 1985. Dating of
the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of
mitochondrial DNA. Journal of Molecular
Evolution 21: 160-174.
Hendy, M. D. and D. Penny. 1982. Branch and bound
algorithms to determine minimal evolutionary trees.
Mathematical Biosciences 59: 277-290.
Hervet, S. 2004. Systematique du groupe
«P alaeochelys sensu lato - Mauremys»
(Chelonii, Testudinoidea) du Tertiaire d’Europe
occidentale: principaux resultas. Annales de
Paleontologie 90: 13-78.
Honda, M., Y. Yasukawa and H. Ota. 2002a. Phylogeny
of Eurasian freshwater turtles of the genus
Mauremys Gray 1 869 (Testudines), with special ref-
erence to a close affinity of Mauremys japonica
with Chinemys reevesii. Journal of Zoological
Systematics and Evolutionary Research 40: 195-
200.
Honda, M., Y. Yuichirou, R. Hirayama and H. Ota.
2002b. Phylogenetic relationships of the Asian box
turtles of the genus Cuora sensu lato (Reptilia:
Bataguridae) inferred from mitochondrial DNA
sequences. Zoological Science 19: 1305-1312.
Huelsenbeck, J. P. and F. Ronquist. 2001. MrBayes:
Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees.
Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
Iverson, J. B., C. H. Ernst, S. Gotte and J. E. Lovich.
1989. The validity of Chinemys megalocephala.
Copeia 1989: 494-498.
Iverson, J. B. and W. P. McCord. 1994. Variation in East
Asian turtles of the genus Mauremys (Bataguridae:
Testudines). Journal of Herpetology 28: 178-187.
Joyce, W. G., J. F. Parham, and J. Gauthier. In press.
Developing a protocol for the conversion of rank-
based taxon names to phylogenetically defined
clade names, as exemplified by turtles. Journal of
Paleontology. In press.
Kumazawa, Y. and M. Nishida. 1993. Sequence evolu-
tion of mitochondrial tRNA genes and deep-branch
animal phylogenetics. Journal of Molecular
Evolution 37: 380-398.
Kumazawa, Y. and M. Nishida. 1995. Variations in mito-
chondrial tRNA gene organization of reptiles as
phylogenetic markers. Molecular Biology and
Evolution 12: 759-772.
Kumazawa, Y., H. Ota, M. Nishida and T. Ozawa. 1996.
Gene rearrangements in snake mitochondrial
genomes: highly concerted evolution of control-
region-like sequences duplicated and inserted into a
tRNA gene center. Molecular Biology and
Evolution 13: 1242-1254.
Lamb, T., C. Lydeard, R. B. Walker and J. W. Gibbons.
1994. Molecular systematics of map turtles
( Graptemys ): A comparison of mitochondrial
restriction site versus sequence data. Systematic
Biology 43: 543-559.
Larget, B. and D. L. Simon. 1999. Markov chain monte
carlo algorithms for the bayesian analysis of phylo-
genetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16:
750-759.
Lau, M. and H. Shi. 2000. Conservation and trade of ter-
restrial and freshwater turtles and tortoises in the
People’s Republic of China. Chelonian Research
Monographs 2: 30-38.
Leache, A. D. and T. W. Reeder. 2002. Molecular sys-
tematics of the Eastern Fence Lizard {Sceloporus
undul atus ): A comparison of parsimony, likelihood,
and Bayesian approaches. Systematic Biology 51:
44-68.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 36
Lenk, P., U. Fritz, U. Joger and M. Winks. 1999.
Mitochondrial phylogeography of the European
pond turtle, Emys orbicularis (Linnaeus 1758).
Molecular Ecology 8: 1911-1922.
Macey, J. R., A. Larson, N. B. Ananjeva, Z. Fang and T.
J. Papenfuss. 1997. Two novel gene orders and the
role ot light-strand replication in rearrangement of
the vertebrate mitochondrial genome. Molecular
Biology and Evolution 14: 91-104.
Macey, J. R., J. A. Schulte, II, A. Larson, B. S. Tuniyev,
N. Orlov and T. J. Papenfuss. 1999. Molecular phy-
logenetics, tRNA evolution, and historical biogeog-
raphy in anguid lizards and related taxonomic fam-
ilies. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 12:
250-272.
Macey, J. R. and A. Verma. 1997. Homology in phylo
genetic analysis: alignment of transfer RNA genes
and the phylogenetic position of snakes. Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution 7: 272-279.
Maddison, W. P, M. J. Donoghue and D. R. Maddison.
1984. Outgroup analysis and parsimony. Systematic
Zoology 33: 83-103.
Maddison, D. R. and W. P. Maddison. 2000. MacClade:
Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Ver.
4.0. Sinauer.
Maniatis, T., E. F. Fristch and J. Sambrook. 1982.
Molecular cloning; a laboratory manual. Cold
Spring Harbor Publication, Cold Spring Harbor,
New York.
McDowell, S. B. 1964. Partition of the genus Clemmys
and related problems in the taxonomy of the aquat-
ic Testudinidae. Proceedings of the Zoolological
Society of London 143: 239-279.
Parham, J. F. and C. R. Feldman. 2002. Generic revi-
sions of emydine turtles. Turtle and Tortoise
Newsletter 6: 30-32.
Parham, J. F. and H. Shi. 2001. The discovery of
Mauremys iversoni- like turtles at a turtle farm in
Hainan Province, China: The counterfeit golden
coin. Asiatic Herpetological Research 9: 71-77.
Parham, J. F., W. B. Simison, K. H. Kozak, C. R.
Feldman and H. Shi. 2001. New Chinese turtles:
Endangered or invalid? A reassessment of two
species using mitochondrial DNA, allozyme elec-
trophoresis, and known locality specimens. Animal
Conservation 4: 357-367.
Posada, D. and K. A. Crandall. 1998. Modeltest: testing
the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:
817-818.
Rannala, B. and Z. H. Yang. 1996. Probability distribu-
tion of molecular evolutionary trees: a new method
of phylogenetic inference. Journal of Molecular
Evolution 43: 304-311.
Saiki, R. K., D. H. Gelfand, S. Stoffel, S. J. Scharf, R. G.
Higuchi, T. T. Horn, K. B. Mullis and H. A. Erlich.
1988. Primer directed enzymatic amplification of
DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase.
Science 239: 487-491.
Sanger, F., S. Nicklen and A. R. Coulson. 1977. DNA
sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
of the United States of America 74: 5463-5467.
Shackleton, R. M. and C. Chang. 1988. Cenozoic uplift
and deformation of the Tibetan Plateau: The geo
morphological evidence. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society of London A 327:
365-377.
Shi, H. and J. F. Parham. 2001. Preliminary observations
of a large turtle farm in Hainan Province, People’s
Republic of China. Turtle and Tortoise Newsletter
3: 2-4.
Sorenson, M. D. 1999. TreeRot. Ver. 2. Boston
University.
Spinks, P. Q., H. B. Shaffer, J. B. Iverson and W. P.
McCord. 2004. Phylogenetics hypotheses for the
turtle family Geoemydidae. Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution. In press.
Starkey, D. E., H. B. Shaffer, R. L. Burke, M. R. J.
Forstner, J. B. Iverson, F. J. Janzen, A. G. J. Rhodin
and G. R. Ultsch. 2003. Molecular systematics, phy
logeography, and the effects of Pleistocene glacia-
tion in the painted turtle {Chrysemys picta ) com-
plex. Evolution 57: 119-128.
Stuart, B. L. and J. F. Parham. 2004. Molecular phyloge-
ny of the critically endangered Indochinese box tur-
tle Cuora galbinifrons. Molecular Phylogenetics
and Evolution 31: 164-177.
Vol. 10, p. 37
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis
using parsimony (*and other methods). Ver. 4.0b 10.
Sinauer Associates Inc.
Templeton, A. R. 1983. Phylogenetic inference from
restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with
particular reference to the evolution of humans and
the apes. Evolution 37: 221-244.
van Dijk, P. P., B. L. Stuart and A. G. J. Rhodin. 2000.
Asian Turtle Trade: Proceedings of a workshop on
conservation and trade of freshwater turtles and tor-
toises in Asia. Chelonian Research Monographs 2:
164.
Windley, B. F. 1988. Tectonic framework of the
Himalaya, Karakorum and Tibet, and problems of
their evolution. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge.
Wink, M., D. Guicking and U. Fritz. 2001. Molecular
evidence for hybrid origin of Mauremys iversoni
Pritchard et McCord, 1991, and Mauremys
pritchardi McCord, 1997 (Reptilia: Testudines:
Bataguridae). Zoologische Abhandlungen,
Staatliches Museum fur Tierkunde Dresden 51: 41-
49.
Wu, P., K.-Y. Zhou and Q. Yang. 1999. Phylogeny of
Asian freshwater and terrestrial turtles based on
sequence analysis of 12S rRNA gene fragment.
Acta Zoologica Sinica 45: 260-267.
Yang, Z. 1994a. Estimating patterns of nucleotide sub-
stitution. Journal of Molecular Evolution 39: 105-
111.
Yang, Z. 1994b. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic esti-
mation from DNA sequences with variable rates
over sites: approximate methods. Journal of
Molecular Evolution 39: 306-314.
Yang, Z. 1996. Maximum likelihood models for com-
bined analyses of multiple sequence data. Journal of
Molecular Evolution 42: 587-596.
Appendix 1.
Specimens used and GenBank Accession numbers for
DNA sequence data. Acronyms are: MVZ = Museum of
Vertebrate Zoology, Berkeley, California; ROM = Royal
Ontario Museum, Toronto, Ontario; AF or AY =
GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.gov).
Mauremys annamensis - Purchased in turtle farm in
Hainan Province, China, no real locality data; MVZ
238937; AY337338, AY337346. Mauremys caspica -
Field collected on Bahrain Island, Bahrain; MVZ
230971; AY337339, AY337347. Mauremys caspica -
Field collected in West Azarbaijan Province, Iran; MVZ
234281; AY337340, AY337348. “ Mauremys iversoni ” -
Purchased in turtle farm in Hainan Province, China, no
real locality data; MVZ 230475; AF348275, AF34281.
Mauremys japonica - Pet trade specimen, no locality
data; MVZ 234647; AY337341, AY337349. Mauremys
leprosa - Field collected in Tetouan Province, Morocco;
MVZ 178059; AY337342, AY337350. Mauremys lep-
rosa - Field collected in Cadiz Province, Spain; MVZ
231989; AY337343, AY337351. Mauremys mutica -
Field collected in Zoushan Island, Zhejiang Province,
China; MVZ 230476; AF348262, AF348278. Mauremys
mutica - Purchased from a turtle trader in Yen Bai
Province, Vietnam; ROM 25613; AF348260,
AF348279. Mauremys mutica - Purchased from a turtle
trader in Yen Bai Province, Vietnam; ROM 25614;
AF348261, AF348280. Mauremys rivulata - Field-col-
lected in Bursa Province, Turkey; MVZ 230212;
AY337344, AY337352. Mauremys ( =Ocadia ) sinensis -
Field-collected in Hainan Province, China; MVZ
230479; AY337345, AY337353. Mauremys nigricans -
Pet trade specimen, no locality data, MVZ 130463;
AF348264, AF348289. Mauremys reevesii - Pet trade
specimen, no locality data, MVZ 230533; AF348263,
AF348288. Cuora picturata - Purchased from a turtle
trader in Dong Nai Province, Vietnam, ROM 37067;
AF348265, AF348292. Cuora trifasciata - Pet trade
specimen, no locality, MVZ 230636; AF348270,
AF348297. Cuora mouhotii - Purchased from a turtle
trader in Bac Thai Province, ROM 35003; AF348273,
AF348286.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, pp. 38-52
A Preliminary Report on Southeast Asia’s Oldest Cenozoic Turtle Fauna
from the Late Middle Eocene Pondaung Formation, Myanmar.
J. Howard Hutchison1, Patricia A. Holroyd1, and Russell L. Ciochon2
1 Museum of Paleontology, 1101 Valley Life Sciences Building, University of California,
Berkeley, California, 94720, U.S.A.
J
- Departments of Anthropology and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, U.S.A.
Abstract. - Late middle Eocene fossils from the Pondaung Lormation of central Myanmar document Southeast Asia’s
oldest Cenozoic turtle fauna. Although the material is fragmentary, seven distinct turtle taxa are recognized. These
include a podocnemid pleurodire, anosteirine and carettochelyine carettochelyids, two or more trionychine triony-
chids, and a testudinid. Of these, only the carettochelyine carettochelyid is complete enough to recognize as a new
taxon, Burmemys magnifica, gen. et sp. nov. The Pondaung turtle fauna is one of the best known of its age from
Southeast Asia but comparisons with the limited literature of the Eocene faunas from China, Mongolia, and the Indian
subcontinent indicate it is probably biogeographically unique. Among the recognized genera, only Anosteira is known
from other Eocene Asian localities, and the presence of pleurodires is unusual.
Key words. - Reptilia, Testudines, Carettochelyidae, Burmemys , Myanmar, Pondaung Lormation, Paleontology,
Eocene.
Introduction
The origins of Southeast Asia’s herpetofauna are poorly
understood, as there are few fossils that document the
origin of the major groups inhabiting the region. The
oldest known herpetofauna from this region is from the
Pondaung Lormation, a late middle Eocene (approx. 37
Ma) set of rocks exposed in the Chindwin-Irrawaddy
Basin of Myanmar (formerly Burma). The Pondaung
fauna is best known for its mammalian fauna (e.g.,
Colbert, 1938; Tsubamoto et al., 2000), and little atten-
tion has been devoted to the remainder of the fauna. In
prior reports, Buffetaut (1978) noted the presence of
both unidentified crocodilians and dyrosaurids; Sahni
(1984) and Rage (1987) noted unidentified Lacertilia.
These reports were based primarily on a rather limited
collection made by Bamum Brown in 1922 and housed
in the American Museum of Natural History, New York.
Savage and Russell (1983) and Broin (1987) list
“Pelomedusid/Emydidae”, “Carettochelyoidea”, and tri-
onychids from the Pondaung. Outside the Pondaung
region, the only other report of turtles from Southeast
Asia is Ducrocq et ah’s (1992) mention of two types of
?Emydidae from the late Eocene site of Krabi, Thailand.
Here we present a preliminary description of the turtles
based on a more thorough study of these collections, and
additional collections in the University of California
Museum of Paleontology, Berkeley, California.
Localities and age. - fossils occur in a number of local-
ities occurring in the upper 100+ meters of the otherwise
marine Pondaung formation. The majority of the speci-
mens discussed here come from localities to the west
and northwest of Mogaung village, Myaing Township,
central Myanmar (fig. 1), that have been collected inter-
mittently over the past 80 years. As a consequence, most
specimens have limited, descriptive locality data that
provides locations based on distances from known vil-
lages. Recent fieldwork has provided detailed, GPS
based mapping of the most productive outcrops and per-
mit us to place most of the historic localities in a more
accurate and stratigraphically detailed framework.
Those localities we can place with confidence are shown
in figure 1. Localities whose positions are approximate
are shown with dashed lines. Concordances for locali-
ties that have been published under more than one name
or number are provided in the caption of figure 1 and
are based on Colbert (1938), maps on file at the
American Museum of Natural History, field notes of J.
Wyatt Durham and Donald E. Savage on file at the
University of California Museum of Paleontology, data
contained in Tsubamoto et al. (2000, 2002) and Gunnell
et al. (2002), and field observations by PAH and RLC.
fossils occur in place and as erosional lag coming
out of reddish to purplish mudstones (Pig. 2 A-C).
fossil wood is also commonly found (Pig. 2D), attesting
to the presence of the ancient forest. Soe et al. (2002)
interpreted sediments including these localities as swale-
fills and/or paleosols deposited in an ancient floodplain;
stratigraphic sections for these localities are contained in
Gunnell et al. (2002). Based on comparisons of tempo-
ral distribution and faunal resemblance data of the
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 39
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
28° N
24 “N
20° N
ia°N
Figure 1. Locality Map of Pondaung Formation localities. V78090=Thandaung kyitchaung and possibly AMNH locali-
ties A14-16, 18-19; V83106, 3.5 mi SW of Mogaung = AMNH A31; V83111 "1 .25 mi NW Paukkaung" probably equals
Pk2; V83116 probably equals Yarshe kyitchaung. V96001-V96002 = AMNH A22 and Lema kyitchaung; V98019
"Thidon or near Bahin", possibly equal to Pkl or Pk2.
Pondaung mammalian fauna with other Asian and North
American mammal faunas, as well as additional con-
straining evidence from marine invertebrates, Holroyd
and Ciochon (1994) concluded that the Pondaung fauna
is best considered latest middle Eocene in age and
broadly contemporaneous with Asian faunas assigned to
the Sharamurunian Land Mammal Age, a finding con-
firmed by recent fission-track dates that provide a date
of 37.2 +/- 1.2 Ma (Tsubamoto et al., 2002).
Abbreviations. - AMNH, American Museum of Natural
History, New York, New York, U.S.A.; UCMP.
University of California Museum of Paleontology,
Berkeley, California, U.S.A.
Systematic Paleontology
Testudines Batsch, 1788
Pleurodira Cope, 1865
Pelomedusoides Cope, 1868
Podocnemididae Cope, 1868
?Podocneniididae unident.
Referred Material. - UCMP locality V83108; UCMP
153798, right peripheral 3. UCMP locality V 83 113;
UCMP 147052, partial left hypo-xiphiplastron. UCMP
locality V96002: UCMP 142245, left incomplete epi-
p I astro n.
MAP 1
MAP 2
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 40
Figure 2. Fossil localities of the Pondaung Formation. A. UCMP locality V96001, Lema kyitchaung; B. UCMP locali-
ty V96002, Lema kyitchaung; C-D. UCMP locality V96007, near Mogaung, showing the common occurrence as float
of both turtle bone (C) and petrified wood (D) on the surface.
Description. - The epiplastron (UCMP 142245, Fig.
3A) lacks the posterolateral part but is otherwise well
preserved. The scale covered surfaces are very finely
textured with delicate but well-defined sulci. Faint
growth corrugations are present on the gular scale
(extragular of Hutchison and Bramble, 1981). There is a
prominent anteriorly-projecting gular spur, and the epi-
plastron margin is distinctly concave between the mid-
line and the gular spur. There is an intergular scale (gular
of Hutchison and Bramble, 1981) spanning the midline
that projects anteriorly into the anterior embayment. The
scales overlap extensively onto the dorsal surface with
little exposure of the visceral surface. The intergular
expands slightly posteriorly on the ventral surface and
Vol. 10, p. 41
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Figure 3. A-C. Podocnemidae? indet. A. UCMP 142245, incomplete left epiplastron, dorsal, medial suture and ven-
tral views. B. 153798, right peripheral 3, external and visceral views. C.UCMP 147052, hypo-xiphiplastron fragment,
dorsal view, spot indicates center of bump. D-E. Testudinidae. D. UCMP 142226, partial right epiplastron, cross-sec-
tion (as indicated) and dorsal views. E. UCMP 149166, partial right xiphiplastron, dorsal view. Scale bars equal 1 cm.
extends onto the entoplastron. Dorsally the intergular
extends slightly more than one-half the length of the
inter-epiplastral suture and is parallel-sided. On the ven-
tral surface, the gular is triangular with the lateral mar-
gins converging to a point at the entoplastron margin.
The hypo-xiphiplastron fragment, UCMP 147052
(Fig. 3C), is broken on all the edges except the free mar-
gin. It exhibits a narrow overlap of the femoral and anal
scales onto the dorsal surface (less than one-fifth the
transverse length as preserved). The swelling at the
anterolateral comer indicates an ascendant hypoplastral
buttress. The sutures are fused. A short expanse of the
femoral-anal scale sulcus is preserved at the extreme
posterior end. Medial to the scale margins on the dorsal
side is a large elliptical swelling that has a smooth sur-
face and may have been divided by the hypo-xiphiplas-
tron suture.
The peripheral 3 (UCMP 153798, Fig. 3B) lacks the
dorsal margin. The body of the peripheral is robust and
without a change in plane between the pleural and mar-
ginal surfaces. The surface is smooth and unsculptured.
The sulci are shallow but well defined. The free margin
is acutely angled. On the visceral side, the marginal
scales rise up from only about one-third of the peripher-
al depth. There is no indication of an axillary scale. The
finely dentate suture for the hyoplastron buttress rises
anteriorly and may have overlapped peripheral 2-3
suture. There is a gap in the hyoplastral suture near the
posterior margin, for passage of the musk duct. The
length between the anterior and posterior sutures along
the free margin of the peripheral is 37.9 mm.
Discussion. - The dorsal scale overlap, truncated anteri-
or margin, undivided intergular, and relatively thick epi-
plastra resemble selected extant or fossil
Pelomedusoides (Bothremydiae, Podocnemididae, and
Pelomedusidae). The prominent epiplastral spurs resem-
ble those of the pelomedusid Kenyemys Wood, 1983,
from the Pliocene of Kenya. Flowever, the Pondaung
form differs in the greater excavation of the gular
embayment, intergular extending onto the entoplastron,
and restriction of the gular scales to the epiplastra (i.e.,
not reaching the midline). The scale arrangement is sim-
ilar to that of the podocnemidid Neochelys Bergounioux,
1954 (Broin, 1977; Jimenez et al., 1994) from the
Eocene of Europe. Neochelys may also possess a rela-
tively prominent gular spur (Broin, 1977, fig. 59), but
differs in the less extensive dorsal overlap of the scales
and lesser development of an epiplastral embayment.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 42
Figure 4. Anosteira sp., A. UCMP 131736, right hypoplastron, ventral view. B. UCMP 131737, lateral fragment of left
hypoplastron, ventral view. C. UCMP 147030, left peripheral 6, external, posterior, visceral, and anterior views. Scale
bars equals 1 cm.
The presence of a prominent musk duct on the
peripheral 3, absence of an axillary scale, and strong
indication of a hyoplastral buttress rising onto the first
costal is consistent with Neochelys- like pleurodires. The
hypoplastron fragment may be referable to the same
taxon, but the area of the pelvic sutures is broken off.
The general similarity to at least some Neochelys
favors a placement of the Pondaung Formation speci-
mens in the Podocnemididae.
Cryptodira Cope, 1868
Testudinidae Gray, 1825
Testudinidae undet.
Referred Material. - UCMP locality V6204: UCMP
149166, right xiphiplastron fragment. UCMP locality
V96009: UCMP 142226, partial right epiplatron.
Description. - The epiplastron (UCMP 142226, Fig.
3D) lacks the gular region. The remaining part of the
free margin is greatly thickened along the anterior edge
of the dorsal scale covered portion. The posterior rim of
this thickened gular area overhangs the visceral surface.
The ventral surface is longitudinally convex. The
sutures are moderately thick and dentate.
The anterolateral part of a right xiphiplastron
(UCMP 149166, Fig. 3E) is referred to the Testudinidae
on the basis of the strong overlap of the femoral scale
dorsally, its inflated appearance, and fairly porous sur-
face texture.
Discussion. - The morphology of the epiplastron is typ-
ical of testudinids and a few batagurids. The rather
porous bone, inflation of the gular area, and general
nature of the sutures and surface texture agrees best with
that of a testudinid. The overhang of the posterior gular
rim is derived in testudinids and absent or poorly devel-
oped in such tortoises as Hadrianus Cope, 1872,
Stylemys Leidy, 1851, Sharemys Gilmore, 1931,
Kansuchelys Yeh, 1963, and Ergilemys Ckhikvadze,
1972. The epiplastron thus resembles more derived tor-
toises such as Testudo Linnaeus, 1858.
Testudinoidea Fitzinger, 1826, indet.
Referred material. - UCMP locality V96019: UCMP
147051, posterior part of left hypoplastron. UCMP
locality V78090: UCMP 170495, partial neural. UCMP
locality V98109: UCMP 170522, shell fragments.
Description. - The hypoplastron is represented by a
fragment (UCMP 147052) that preserves the portion
Vol. 10, p. 43
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Figure 5. Burmemys magnifica gen. et sp. n. A. UCMP 61212, adult left hypoplastron (type), ventral view. B. UCMP
131745. juvenile left hypoplastron, ventral view. C. UCMP 154993, posterior part of juvenile left epiplastron, ventral
view. D. UCMP 131747, anterior part of juvenile left xiphiplastron, dorsal and ventral view. E. UCMP 157444, juvenile
left costal 2, external view. F. UCMP 147022, neural, external view. G. UCMP 157442, suprapygal, external view. Scale
bars equals 1 cm.
2004
Asiatic Herpelological Research
Vol. 10, p. 44
Figure 6. Burmemys magnifies gen. et sp. n. A. AMNH 14196, left peripheral 1, anterior suture, external and visceral
views. B. UCMP 147021, left peripheral 1, external, posterior suture and visceral views. C. UCMP 147027, left periph-
eral 2, external and visceral views. D. UCMP 147002, left peripheral 3, external, visceral and posterior suture views.
E. UCMP 61211, left peripheral 4, external and visceral views. F. UCMP 147001, left peripheral 4 fragment, visceral
and posterior suture views (arrow points to flat hyoplastral suture). G. UCMP 131756, juvenile left peripheral 5, suture
view. H. UCMP 61218, left peripheral 6, external, posterior suture, visceral and anterior suture views. I. UCMP 142223,
right peripheral 7, external, anterior suture, visceral, posterior suture views. J. UCMP 157445, juvenile left peripheral
7 external, visceral, and anterior suture views. K. UCMP 142244, right peripheral 8, external, anterior suture, viscer-
al and posterior views. L. AMNH 1911, left peripheral 10 and pygal, external view. Scale bars equal 1 cm.
Vol. 10, p. 45
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
posterior to the buttress. The free margin is slightlv con-
vex. The femoral scale distinctly but narrowly overlaps
the dorsal side. The margin dorsal margin of the scale is
marked by a shallow sulcus and the bone continues to
thicken medially before thing nearer the midline. A par-
tial neural (UCMP 170495) has a distinct carina with a
rounded top.
Discussion. - The referred fragmentary specimens do
not appear to belong to other known taxa in the fauna
and agree in general morphology with testudinoids,
probably testudinids or batagurids. The neural resembles
those of carinate batagurids.
Carettochelyidae Boulenger, 1887
Anosteirinae Lydekker, 1889
Anosteira Leidy, 1 87 1
Anosteira sp.
Referred material. - UCMP locality UCMP V78090:
UCMP 131752, peripheral 9 or 10; UCMP 131754,
hypoplastron fragment; UCMP 131755, posterior frag-
ment of nuchal; UCMP 147115, neural. UCMP locality
V83106: UCMP 131736, medial right hypoplastron
fragment; UCMP 131737, lateral hypoplastron frag-
ment; UCMP 131741, peripheral 7; UCMP 131742,
peripheral 8; UCMP 131744, costal fragments; UCMP
131746, anterior fragment of a right peripheral 6. UCMP
locality V96001: UCMP 147005, hypoplastron frag-
ment; UCMP 147011, left peripheral 7. UCMP locality
V96002: UCMP 147030, left peripheral 6. UCMP local-
ity V96008: UCMP 147024, right peripheral 2. UCMP
locality V96009: UCMP 142225, peripheral 9 or 10.
Description: The hyoplastron resembles those seen in
typical Anosteira and Pseudanosteira Clark, 1932, and
lacks the truncated anteromedial articulation of the new
genus described below. This specimen differs from
Allaeochelys Noulet, 1867, in having a narrower poste-
rior lobe and narrower bridge area.
The peripherals are referred to Anosteira on the
basis of their small size and well-formed sutures. Most
also show the presence of weekly-defined sulci on the
external surface. All the peripherals have sharp margin-
al carina, and the surface is finely pustulate. The gom-
photic pits for reception of the plastron on peripheral 6
(UCMP 147030, Fig. 4C) lie within a longitudinal
trough that traverses the peripheral. The latter is 12.6
mm along the free margin carina and 12.5 mm from the
carina to the costal suture. A partial peripheral 6 (UCMP
131746) has the trough on the plastral suture filled with
8-9 vertically elongated pits and a shaip lateral carina.
The two gomphotic pits on peripheral 7 also occur with-
in a trough, but on peripheral 7 the trough is only
approximately two-thirds the length of the bone. The
peripheral 7 (UCMP 147011) is 12.0 mm along the cari-
na. The specimen tentatively identified as peripheral 9 or
10 (UCMP 131752) is deeper than long (16 mm along
the margin, 18 mm in depth).
The posterior nuchal fragment has the typical caret-
tochelyid nuchal pedicle. A faint transverse sulcus is
present, and another faint longitudinal sulcus near the
midline is visible.
A small neural (UCMP 147115) is also referred to
Anosteira on the basis of the small size and patterned
surface, narrow length to width ratio, and low and broad
central carina.
Discussion. - Anosteira is known from both Asia (5
species) and North America (1 species) in the Eocene.
The closely related genus Pseudanosteira is limited to
North America and distinguishable from Anosteira only
by details of the top of the carapace. No elements in the
Pondaung collection resemble Pseudanosteira. The
presence of sulci on the peripherals, nuchal, and costal
fragments indicates it should be assigned to Anosteira.
The Pondaung specimen is most parsimoniously
referred to Anosteira in the absence of any evidence that
Pseudanosteira occurs anywhere in Asia. Previous
records of Anosteira are confined to China and
Mongolia.
Carettochelyinae Boulenger, 1887
Burmemys magnified gen. et sp. nov.
Holotype. - UCMP 61212, adult left hypoplastron (Fig.
5 A) from UCMP Locality V6204 (near Myaing), found
by J. Wyatt Durham, late Professor of Paleontology at
the University of California, Berkeley.
Paratypes. - AMNH locality “1 mile northeast of Gyat,
Magwe Province”: AMNH 1911, pygal, peripheral 10
fragment, and costal fragment. AMNH locality “1 mile
north of Koniwa”: AMNH 1919, left first peripheral;
AMNH 1928, distal half of right first peripheral; AMNH
14196, partial left peripheral 1; AMNH 14197, plastron
fragment. UCMP locality V6204: UCMP 61211, left
peripheral 4; UCMP 61218, left peripheral 6. UCMP
locality V78090: UCMP 131750, juvenile lateral
hypoplastron fragment, UCMP 131751, juvenile periph-
eral fragment; UCMP 131753 juvenile xiphiplastron
fragment; UCMP 154994, proximal costal fragment.
UCMP locality V83106: UCMP 13 1738, juvenile right
hypoplastron; UCMP 131739, juvenile hypoplastron
fragment; UCMP 131745, juvenile left hypoplastron.
UCMP locality V 83 111: UCMP 128406, right peripher-
al 2. UCMP locality V83 1 1 6: UCMP 1 3 1 748, hypoplas-
tron fragment. UCMP locality V83143: UCMP 131747,
Vol. 10, p. 46
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
anterior part of left xiphiplastron. UCMP locality
V96001: UCMP 147001, left peripheral 4 fragment;
UCMP 147002, partial left peripheral 3; UCMP 147003,
anterior peripheral fragment; UCMP 147009, neural;
UCMP 147010, peripheral fragment; UCMP 147012,
juvenile medial hypoplastron fragment. UCMP locality
V96002: UCMP 142244, right peripheral 8; UCMP
154984, anterior peripheral fragment. UCMP locality
V96008: UCMP 147021, left first peripheral; UCMP
147023, posterior peripheral fragment; UCMP 147027,
left peripheral 2; UCMP 147028, partial right peripheral
1; UCMP 147029 distal fragment of a costal. UCMP
locality V96009: UCMP 142223, right peripheral 7.
UCMP locality V99498: UCMP 157443, neural; UCMP
157446, shell fragments.
Referred material. - UCMP locality V96001: UCMP
147004, plastron fragment. UCMP locality V83106:
UCMP 131740, hyoplastron fragment. UCMP locality
V78090: UCMP 131756, juvenile left peripheral 5;
UCMP 154993, posterior fragment of left epiplastron.
UCMP locality V99498: UCMP 157442, suprapygal;
UCMP 157444, left costal 2; UCMP 157445, left periph-
eral 7.
Diagnosis. - Burmemys is distinguished from other
carettochelyines by the combination of asymmetrical
articulation of the hyo-hypoplastra, narrow hypoplastral
bridge, and large size (estimated carapace length greater
than 1000 mm).
Description. - The holotype hypoplastron (UCMP
61212, Fig. 5 A) is massive. The anterior suture of the
left hypoplastron consists of two sutures. The suture
with the left hyoplastron is sinusoidal, curving antero-
medially, and joins a distinct, straight and anteromedial-
ly-facing suture, presumably for articulation with the
right hyoplastron. The ventral sculpture consists of a
pattern of irregular, closely-spaced tubercles that radiate
from a focal point lateral to the middle of the medial
moiety. Laterally, the tubercles coalesce into ridges radi-
ating laterally. The sutures are finely dentate and thick
(13 mm). The lateral margin and posterior half of the
medial part is broken away in the type, but these are pre-
served in the juvenile specimen (UCMP 131745, Fig.
5B). The width of the medial part of the hypoplastron
measured from the apex of the inguinal notch to the
plastral midline is only one-half or less of the maximum
hypoplastral width. The inguinal notch is open and not
confined as in Carettochelys Ramsey, 1887. The anteri-
or-posterior width of the bridge area is one-half or less
the width of the xiphiplastral lobe of the hypoplastron.
The referred juvenile specimens exhibit the same sutur-
al shapes as the adult (type) but the inguinal notches are
shallower, sculpture less organized, and lateral extent of
the lateral arm of the bridges are shorter.
The posterior part of a juvenile epiplastron (UCMP
154993, Fig. 5C) is referred to Burmemys on the basis of
the convex curvature of the lateral margin that indicates
a short and rounded anterior lobe, and an obtuse angle
between the entoplastral and hyoplastral sutures indicat-
ing a short and broad entoplastron.
Two xiphiplastra (UCMP 131747, Fig. 5D; UCMP
131753) are referred to Burmemys on the basis of rela-
tively larger size, converging (non-parallel) medial and
lateral margins of the anterior moiety, and thinning
rather than thickening toward the midline suture. Both
specimens are small (proximal width of UCMP 131747
is 20 mm) and thus considered as juveniles.
The juvenile left costal (UCMP 157444, Fig. 5E) is
nearly uniformly thin, parallel sided, and sculptured
with a subdued and random pattern of low pustules and
short ridges. The distal margin forms about a 45 degree
angle to the sides. There are no sulci. The parallel sides
and high angle of the distal margin indicate a second
costal.
The distal end of an adult costal (UCMP 147029) is
subtlety sculptured with longitudinal irregular ridges.
The distal suture is weakly dentate but patent except
above the rib. The rib ends protrudes prominently.
Although damaged, the distal width is about 70 mm.
A large neural (UCMP 147009, Figs. 5F) is relative-
ly narrow, lacks a midline carina, and has subtle sculp-
ture of very shallow dimples. It has a midline length of
51 mm, maximum width of 32 mm, and maximum
thickness of the lateral side of 15.4 mm.
The suprapygal (UCMP 157442, Fig. 5G) is trian-
gular with a distinct medial carina. The surface sculpture
consists of irregular vermiform ridges that radiate from
the central area of the posterior margin. It is longer than
wide (32.2 mm long, 31.5 mm wide).
At least nine peripheral positions are represented.
The sculpture is variable consisting of distinct tubercles
at one extreme to anastomosing pits and ridges at the
other. The free margins of adult specimens are rounded
but may be acute in juveniles. There are no indications
of scale sulci.
The first peripheral exhibits distinct sutures with the
first costal, nuchal and second peripheral. The free mar-
gin perimeter is asymmetrically curved. The largest
specimens (AMNH 1919, Fig. 6A; UCMP 147021, Fig.
6B) have perimeter lengths of 114 and 119 mm, maxi-
mum depths of 90 and 81 mm, maximum thicknesses at
the posterior suture of 33 and 27 mm, and maximum
thicknesses at anterior suture of 28 and 25 mm respec-
tively.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 47
The two second peripherals differ in size. UCMP
147026 (Fig. 6C) is massive with a free margin length of
82 mm, maximum depth of 67 mm, and maximum thick-
ness of the anterior suture of 20 mm. Comparable meas-
urements of UCMP 128406 are 45, 40, and 11 mm
respectively. The second peripheral is roughly rectangu-
lar in external view.
The only specimen referred to the third peripheral
(UCMP 147002, Fig. 6D) is lacking the anteroventral
and posterodorsal corners. The anterior part of the dor-
sal suture is a semi-scarf joint — probably for the rib end
of the first costal. The peripheral thickens noticeably
towards the posterior suture and reaches a thickness of
32 mm at the suture.
The fourth peripheral (UCMP 61211, Fig. 6E) is
damaged anteriorly and dorsally and locally abraded. Its
length along the lateral carina is 75 mm. The free mar-
gin curves posteromedially on the posterior moiety to
form a plastral articulation. The plastral articular surface
is relatively flat but deep (up to 16 mm) and without pits
for the hyoplastral buttress or normal dentations, thus
indicating a weakly ligamental and kinetic joint. The lat-
eral carina is broadly rounded. The peripheral 4 frag-
ment (UCMP 147001, Fig. 6F) also shows this rather flat
and deep (19 mm) hyoplastral suture.
A small peripheral, probably a left peripheral 5
(UCMP 131756, Fig. 6G) is considered a juvenile of this
species. The plastral arm is very short with a longitudi-
nal trough enclosing a series of gomphotic pits. The lat-
eral carina is slightly rounded and broadly upturned. The
length of the lateral carina is 22 mm and has a posterior
thickness of about 9 mm.
A relatively complete left peripheral 6 (UCMP
61218, Fig. 6H) has a damaged plastral margin and lacks
the dorsal suture. The plastral and costal arms converge
posteriorly. The plastral articulation is broken anteriorly
but posteriorly has a longitudinal trough indicating inter-
digitation with the hypoplastron. The lateral carina is
rounded and slightly upturned. The length along the lat-
eral carina is 82 mm.
A peripheral 7 (UCMP 142223, Fig. 61) of an adult
measures 99 mm along the marginal carina, 100 mm
from the carina to costal margin, posterior thickness of
29 mm and an anterior thickness of more than 45 mm.
The hypoplastral suture is damaged but trough-like,
extends about half-way along the medial side, and
appears to have housed one or two recessed pits. The
isolated peripheral 7 (UCMP 157445, Fig. 6J), a pre-
sumed juvenile, closely resembles Carettochelys with
the hypoplastral buttress rising up the central part of the
medial side. The free margin is sharp and broadly
upturned. The length of the free margin is about 34 mm.
The adult peripheral 8 (UCMP 142244, Fig. 6K) is
massive and slightly shorter than deep (97 mm along the
lateral carina and 105 mm from the carina to costal
suture). An anteriorly-deepening trough divides the
medial surface into dorsal and ventral arms anteriorly.
The pygal (AMNH 1911, Fig. 6L) is distinctly
trapezoidal with a short anterior side and a low but sharp
medial crest. The sculpture consists of widely spaced
irregular tubercles that fade out near the medial crest and
free margin. An associated posterior peripheral 10 frag-
ment has a sculpture of irregular ridges and tubercles
that radial from a central focus.
Discussion. - The absence of scales and large size place
Burmemys in the Carettochelyinae. Of the three Eocene
genera of Carettochelyinae, Burmemys differs from all
in the presence of two distinct anterior articular sutures
on one of the hypoplastra. This most likely represents an
asymmetrical articulation with the hyoplastra, with one
of the hyoplastra extending well across the midline to
form an angled articulation with the opposite hypoplas-
tron. Even where the hyo-and hypoplastra are not mirror
images with one of the hypoplastra contacting the oppo-
site hyoplastron (e.g., Anosteira in Hay, 1908, Fig. 353),
the midline suture remains straight as in other Paleogene
carettochelyids and the plastral midline suture usually
exhibits some limited kinesis. This asymmetry is not
unusual in turtles, but within carettochelyids was known
only to a lesser degree in some Carettochelys. The
hypoplastron in extant Carettochelys insculpta Ramsey,
1887 may cross the midline to form a short angled suture
with the opposite hyoplastron (AMNH 84212, and
Rooij, 1915, fig. 123a). This occurs on the left hyoplas-
tra on both of these.
Burmemys resembles anosteirines and differs from
extant Carettochelys, Hemichelys Lydekker, 1887, (pi.
XII, fig. 2) from the Eocene of the Punjab, and
Chorlakkichelys Broin, 1987 (pi. 1, fig. 2) from the
Eocene of Pakistan in the relatively broad inguinal
notch. Burmemys additionally differs from
Chorlakkichelys and Carettochelys in having a distinct-
ly narrow bridge area. The general proportions of the
hypoplastron resemble those of Allaeochelys from the
Eocene of Europe (Broin, 1977, PI. XVI, Fig. 3). The
suprapygal differs from Allaeochelys, Carettochelys,
Hemichelys and probably Chorlakkichelys in being
longer than wide.
Burmemys is also the largest carettochelyid
described to date. Based on scaling up of the elements
in comparison to other carettochelyids, we can estimate
that the shell length of Burmemys exceeded 1000 mm.
This estimate suggests that Burmemys is among the
largest turtles known, but is smaller than estimates Head
et al. (1999) provided for Eocene trionychids from
Pakistan, which may have reached more than 2000 mm
in length, and is smaller than the giant Bridgerian triony-
chid from Wyoming (Gaffney, 1979).
Vol. 10, p. 48
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Figure 7. Trionychinae. A. UCMP 61213, right hypoplastron, ventral view. B. UCMP 1537993, fragment of right
hypoplastron, ventral view. C. UCMP 147022, neural, external view. D. UCMP 170520, costal fragment, external view.
Scale bars equals 1 cm.
Trionychidae Gray, 1825
Trionychinae Gray, 1825
Trionychinae genus indet.
Trionychinae, large form
Referred material. - UCMP locality V6204: UCMP
61213, right hypoplastron. UCMP locality V78090:
UCMP 170497, costal fragments. UCMP locality
V83116: UCMP 153799, fragment of right hypoplas-
tron. UCMP locality V83143: UCMP 173809, plastron
fragment. UCMP locality V96001: UCMP 147020,
costal fragment. UCMP locality V96002: UCMP
154983, costal proximal fragment. UCMP locality
V96008: UCMP 147022, neural. UCMP locality
V96009: UCMP 142222, plastron fragment.
Description. - The hypoplastron (UCMP 61213, Fig.
7A) lacks the projecting spines (present in UCMP
153799, Fig. 7B) but is otherwise relatively complete.
The calloused area has well defined edges and covers
most of the ventral surface, except for the long offset
shelf on the medial edge. The calloused area is sculp-
tured with distinct pits and ridges, while the shelf is
amorphously roughened. The buttress is composed of
two protruding spikes. The posteromost of these is bro-
ken off at the base, but the larger anterior one is divided
into three fluted points at its tip.
The isolated neural (UCMP 147022, Fig. 7C), prob-
ably 6 or 7, is hexagonal and narrows distinctly posteri-
orly. The dorsal surface is weakly sculptured, lack sulci,
and is flat anteriorly but is formed into a central carina
posteriorly. The neural is 46 mm long and 50 mm wide.
Discussion. - The large size of the hypoplastron and
general conformation indicates a trionychine and gener-
ally resembles Pelochelys Gray 1864, Chitra Gray 1 844,
and Pelodiscus Fitzinger 1835 in these features, but dif-
fers in having a wide, unsculptured medial shelf.
Additional material would be needed to refine identifi-
cation.
Trionychinae, small form
Referred material. - UCMP locality V6204: UCMP
61210 plastron fragment. UCMP locality V83106:
UCMP 147116, two costal fragments.
Description. - Two distal costal fragments exhibit a
well-defined sculpture of pits and ridges with indica-
tions of longitudinal welts. The pattern extends to the
free margin with only a slight sculpture-free zone at the
free margin, suggesting an adult turtle of relatively small
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 49
size in comparison with the preceding taxon. The sculp-
ture resembles that of a trionychine rather than a
cyclanorbine such as Lissemys Smith, 1931.
Trionychinae, ornate form
Referred material. - UCMP locality V98109: UCMP
170520, two costal fragments.
Description. - The costal fragments (UCMP 170520,
Fig. 7D) exhibit a striking sculpture of large, elongate
tubercles rising above a surface composed of a general-
ly organized pattern of longitudinal rows of shallow pits
and low rides. The longitudinal axes of the raised tuber-
cles vary from anterior-posterior to medial-lateral and
are large (11-15 mm) relative to the overall size of the
larger costal fragment (maximum preserved width of 32
mm). Carapace sculpturing varies between individuals
and also ontogenetically, but the peculiar sculpture
shows some resemblance to that seen in some extant
Aspideretes Hay, 1904.
Discussion
In addition to the turtles, a variety of other lower verte-
brates are present in the Pondaung Formation including
a carcharhinid shark, Galeocerdo Muller and Henle
1837 (UCMP 142238), a clariid catfish (UCMP
128411), at least four species of agamid lizards (UCMP
128410, 130290, 142227, 142232), paleophid and colu-
broid snakes (see Head et al, in prep.), and a minimum
of two crocodilians, including a pristichampsine croco-
dylian (UCMP 147127) and a dyrosaurid (Buffetaut,
1978).
Unfortunately, reports on Asian lower vertebrates of
comparable age (Sharamurunian Asian Land Mammal
Age or late middle Eocene) are few. Thus, the limited lit-
erature, combined with the fragmentary nature of the
Pondaung fossils themselves, make detailed compar-
isons with other faunas difficult. Nonetheless, compar-
isons with known Sharamurunian lower vertebrate fau-
nas reveal only a few similarities between the Pondaung
and any other locality. Pleurodires are previously unde-
scribed from Asia, although Broin (1987) notes the pres-
ence of “Pelomedusidae and / or Emydidae” from the
middle Eocene of Pakistan and Oligocene of India. An
adocid was described by Gilmore (1931) from the late
middle Eocene of Mongolia, but none were identified in
the Pondaung assemblage. The carettochelyid genus,
Anosteira , has been reported from age-equivalents in
Manchuria (Zangerl, 1947) and Guangdong, China (Sun
Ailing et al., 1992) and from slightly younger sediments
in Shandong and Guangdong provinces (Yeh, 1963).
The only other carettochelyines described from Asia are
Chorlakkichelys and Hemichelys from the early middle
Eocene of Pakistan (Lydekker, 1887; Broin, 1987), and
Burmemys is the most easterly and southerly Eocene
record of the subfamily. Trionychids, as elsewhere, are
an important part of the fauna, but our material is not
sufficiently diagnostic to make any meaningful biogeo-
graphic comparisons. Testudinids are widely reported in
Chinese and Mongolian Eocene faunas (Gilmore, 1931;
Ye, 1963), but all of these appear to be more generalized
forms similar to Hadrianus or Kansuchelys. The
Pondaung form appears to be more like the modern
Testudo, and thus distinct from contemporaneous
Chinese and Mongolian taxa.
Among other reptiles, the only other agamid lizard
known in the Asian Sharamurunian is Tinosaurus yuan-
quensis from the Heti Formation (Li, 1991), but it is a
diminutive form that bears no resemblance to the
Pondaung agamids. Crocodilians are known elsewhere,
but not in detail. In overall diversity, the Pondaung
fauna shares more general resemblances to the better-
known Irdinmanhan faunas, especially that of the
Kuldana Formation of Pakistan (Broin, 1987).
Based on the fragmentary evidence available to
date, several observations can be made regarding the
Pondaung lower vertebrate fauna. Faunal endemicity is
supported by the number of unique taxa, and the compo-
sition of the turtle fauna is unusual with trionychoids
(especially carettochelyids) dominating. Faunal compo-
sition and the large size of these turtles are consistent
with an interpretation of these sites as representing a
warm, tropical floodplain environment, deposited fairly
near shore. The aquatic habits of most of the lower ver-
tebrates suggest that during late middle Eocene time the
Pondaung region was a well-drained floodplain environ-
ment, a finding consistent with previous geological
interpretations (e.g., Bender, 1983, Soe et al., 2002).
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Donald E. Savage, Ba Maw, and
Thaw Tint for reinitiating fieldwork in the Pondaung
region in the late 1970’s, and Brig. -Gen Than Tun and
Major Bo Bo from the Office of Strategic Studies,
Ministry of Defense for arranging our visits to
Myanmar. Tin Thein, Aye Ko Aung, Aung Naing Soe,
and other members of the Pondaung Fossil Expedition
team are thanked for their assistance during our stays
and their help while in the field. Eugene Gaffney,
Charlotte Hotton, and Mark Norell kindly provided
access to and assistance in use of the AMNH collections
and associated records. Walter Joyce reviewed the man-
uscript and provided constructive criticisms. Funding
for fieldwork in Myanmar has been provided by the
Smithsonian Foreign Currency Program (from Public
Vol. 10, p. 50
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Law 480 funds), the L.S.B. Leakey Foundation, the
University of California Museum of Paleontology, the
University of North Carolina at Charlotte Foundation,
the University of Iowa Center for Pacific and Asian
Studies, the Office of the Vice President for Research
and the Human Evolution Research Fund of the
University of Iowa Foundation. This is UCMP contribu-
tion no. 1836.
Literature Cited
Batsch, A. J. G. C. 1788. Versuch einer Anleitung zur
Kenntniss und Geschichte der Thiere und
Mineralien. Vol. 1. Akademische Buchhandlung,
Jena, viii + 528 pp.
Bender, F. 1983. The Geology of Burma. Beitrage zur
Regionalen Geologie der Erde, Band 16, 293 pp.
Boulenger, G. A. 1887. On a new family of pleurodiran
turtles. Annals and Magazine of Natural History
19:170-172.
Broin, F. de. 1977. Contribution a l’etude des
cheloniens. Cheloniens continentaux du Cretace et
du Tertiaire de France. Memoires du Museum
National d’Histoire Naturelle, N. Ser. C, 38:1-423.
Broin, F. de. 1987. Lower vertebrates from the early-
middle Eocene Kuldana Formation of Kohat
(Pakistan): Chelonia. Contributions from the
Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan
27(7): 169- 185.
Buffetaut, E. 1978. A dyrosaurid (Crocodilia,
Mesosuchia) from the upper Eocene of Burma.
Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und Palaontologie,
Monatshefte 5:273-281.
Ckhikvadze, V. M. 1972. O sistematichekom polozhenii
tretichnykh gigantskikh sukhoputnykh cherepakh
Palearktiki. [On the systematic positions of the
Tertiary gigantic land turtles of Palearctic]. Bulletin
of the Academy of Sciences of the Georgian R.S.S.
65(3):745-748.
Clark, J. 1932. A new anosteirid from the Uinta Eocene.
Annals of the Carnegie Museum 21:161-170.
Colbert, E. 1938. Fossil mammals from Burma in the
American Museum of Natural History. Bulletin of
the American Museum of Natural History 74:255-
436.
Cope, E D. 1865. Third contribution to the herpetology
of tropical America. Proceedings of the Academy of
Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 1865:185-198.
Cope, E D. 1868. On the origin of genera. Proceedings
of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia
1868:92-93.
Cope, E. D. 1872. Second account of new vertebrata
from the Bridger Eocene of Wyoming Territory.
Proceeding of the American Philosophical Society
12:466-468.
De Rooij, N. 1915. Reptiles of the Indo-Australian
Archipelago, Lacertilia, Chelonia, Emydosauria. E.
J. Brill, Leiden. 1: xiv + 384 pp.
Ducrocq, S., E. Buffetaut, H. Buffetaut-Tong, R.
Helmcke-Ingavat, J.-J. Jaeger, Y.
Jongkanjanasoontom, and V. Suteethom. 1992. A
Lower Tertiary vertebrate fauna from Krabi (South
Thailand). Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und
Palaontologie, Abhandlungen 184(1): 101-122.
Fitzinger, L. J. 1826. Neue Classification der Reptilien
nach ihren natiirlichen Verwandtschaften nebst
einer Verwandtschafts-Tafel und einen
Verzeichnisse der Reptilien-Sammlung des k. k.
Zoologischen Museum’s zu Wien. J. G. Htibner,
Wien, viii + 66 p.
Fitzinger, L., 1835. Entwurf einer systematischen
Anordnung der Schildkroten nach den Grundsatzen
der natiirlichen Methode. Annalen der Wiener
Museums des Naturgeschichte 1:103-128.
Gilmore, C. W. 1931. Fossil turtles of Mongolia.
Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural
History 59:213-257.
Gray, J. E. 1 825. A synopsis of the genera of reptiles and
Amphibia, with a description of some new species.
Annals of Philosophy, London. Ser. 2 10:193-217.
Gray, J. E. 1844. Catalogue of tortoises, crocodiliens,
and amphisbaenians in the collection of the British
Museum. British Museum (Natural History),
London, viii + 80 pp.
Gray, J. E. 1864. Revision of the species Trionychidae
found in Asia and Africa, with description of some
new species. Proceedings of the Zoological Society
of London 1864: 76-98.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 51
Gunnell, G. F., R. L. Ciochon, P. D. Gingerich, and P. A.
Holroyd. 2002. Re-assessment of Pondaungia and
Amphipithecus (Primates) from the late middle
Eocene ot Myanmar with comments on
“Amphipithecidae.” Contributions from the
Museum ot Paleontology, University of Michigan
30: 337-372.
Hay, O. P. 1904. On the existing genera of the
Trionychidae. Proceedings of the Americana
Philosophical Society 42:268-249.
Hay, O. P. 1908. Fossil turtles of North America.
Carnegie Institute of Washington, Publication 75:
568 pp.
Head, J. J., P. A. Holroyd, J. H. Hutchison, and R. L.
Ciochon. in prep. First report of snakes (Serpentes)
from the late middle Eocene Pondaung Formation,
Myanmar.
Head, J. J., S. M. Raza, and P. D. Gingerich. 1999.
Drazinderetes tethyensis, a new large trionychid
(Reptilia: Testudines) from the marine Eocene
Drazinda Formation of the Sulaiman Range, Punjab
(Pakistan). Contributions from the Museum of
Paleontology, University of Michigan 30:199-214.
Holroyd, P. A. and Ciochon, R. L. 1994. Relative ages of
Eocene primate-bearing deposits of Asia. Pp. 123-
141. In J. G. Fleagle and R. F. Kay (eds.),
Anthropoid Origins. Plenum Press, New York.
Hutchison, J. H., and D. M. Bramble. 1981. Homology
of the plastral scales of the Kinostemidae and relat-
ed turtles. Herpetologica 37:73-85.
Jimenez, E., M. A. Cuesta, and S. G. Tudanca. 1994.
Vertebrados fosiles del Eoceno de Fuentesauco
(Zamora). Studia Geologica Salamanticensia
29:7-21.
Leidy, J. 1851. [Fossil tortoises from Nebraska
Territory]. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural
Sciences, Philadelphia 5: 326-327.
Leidy, J. 1871. [Remarks on extinct turtles from
Wyoming Territory, Anosteira ornata and
Hybemys arenarius.] Proceedings of the
Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia 1871:
102-103.
Li, Jingling. 1991. Fossil reptiles from Zhaili member,
Heti Formation, Yuanqu, Shanxi. Vertebrata
PalAsiatica 29(3): 190-203.
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema Naturae 10th ed., vol. 1.
Stockholm, 824 pp.
Lydekker, R. 1887. Eocene chelonians from the Salt-
Range. Paleontologica Indica 4:59-65.
Lydekker, R. 1889. Chapter III. Class Reptilia - contin-
ued. Orders Anomodontia, Sauropterygia, and
Chelonia. Pp. 1053-1118. In: H. A. Nicholson and
R. Lydekker, Manual of Paleontology. Vol 2. W.
Blackwood and Sons, Edinburgh. 3rd ed.
Muller, J., and J. Henle. 1837. Gattungen der Haifische
und Rochen nach einer von ihm mit Hm. Henle
untemommenen gemeinschaftlichen Arbeit uber die
Naturgeschichte der Knorpelfische. Bericht der
Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin 1:111-118.
Noulet, J. B. 1867. Nouveau genre de Tortues fossiles
sous le nom d 'Allaeochelys. Memoires de V
Academie des sciences, Toulouse (6e ser.) 5:172-
177.
Ramsey, E. P. 1886 [1887]. On a new genus and species
of fresh water tortoise from the Fly River, New
Guinea. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New
South Wales (2)1:158-162.
Rage, J.-C. 1987. Lower vertebrates from the early-
middle Eocene Kuldana Formation of Kohat
(Pakistan): Squamata. University of Michigan
Contribution from the Museum of Paleontology
27:187-193.
Sahni, A. 1984. Upper Cretaceous-early Palaeogene
palaeobiogeography of India based on terrestrial
vertebrate faunas. Memoires de la Societe'
geologique de France, N. S. 147: 125-137.
Savage, D. E., and D. E. Russell. 1983. Mammalian
Paleofaunas of the World. Addison-Wesley,
Reading Massachusetts. 432 pp.
Smith, M. A. 1931. The fauna of British India, includ-
ing Ceylon and Burma. Reptilia and Amphibia.
Vol. 1. Loricata, Testudines. Taylor and Francis,
London. 185 pp.
Soe, Aung Naing, Myitta, Soe Thura Tun, Aye Ko Aung,
Tin Thein, B. Marandat, S. Ducrocq, & J.-J. Jaeger.
2002. Sedimentary facies of the late Middle Eocene
Pondaung Formation (central Myanmar) and the
Vol. 10, p. 52
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
paleoenvironments of its anthropoid primates.
Comptes Rendus Palevol 1:153-160.
Sun, A., J. Li, X. Ye, Z. Dong, L. Lou. 1992. The
Chinese fossil reptiles and their kins. Science Press,
Beijing. 242 pp.
Tsubamoto, T., N. Egi, M. Takai, N. Shigehara, Aye Ko
Aung, Tin Thein, Aung Naing Soe and Soe Thura
Tun. 2000,: A preliminary report on the Eocene
mammals of the Pondaung fauna, Myanmar. Asian
Paleoprimatology 1: 29-101.
Tsubamoto, T., Takai, M., Shigehara, N., Egi, N., Soe
Thura Tun, Aye Ko Aung, Maung Maung, Danhara,
T., and Suzuki, H. 2002. Fission-track zircon age of
the Eocene Pondaung Formation, Myanmar. Journal
of Human Evolution 42: 361-369.
Wood, R. C. 1983. Kenyemys williamsi, a fossil pelome-
dusid turtle from the Pliocene of Kenya. Pp. 74-85.
In: A. G. Rhodin et al. (eds). Advances in
Herpetology and Evolutionary Biology.
Ye (Yeh), X. 1963. Fossil turtles of China.
Palaeontologica Sinica, new Series C (18): 112 pp.
Zangerl, R. 1947. A new anosteirine turtle from
Manchuria. Fieldiana, Geology 10:13-21.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, pp. 53-109
A Review of the Comparative Morphology of Extant Testudinoid Turtles
(Reptilia: Testudines)
Walter G. Joyce1 and Christopher J. Bell2
1 Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511
E-mail: walter.joyce@yale.edu
Department of Geological Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712
E-mail: cjbell@mail. utexas. edu
Abstract. - With an expansive geographic distribution, an excellent fossil record, and over 140 recognized extant
species, testudinoid turtles constitute one of the most diverse and widespread clades of turtles. The current under-
standing of the distribution of morphological characters among testudinoid turtles is poor. Improved knowledge will
help to facilitate accurate identification of fossil remains, and to provide a reliable morphological data set for phylo-
genetic analyses. We provide a critical review of skeletal and scute characters commonly utilized in previous system-
atic analyses of Testudinoidea. Description and illustration of character states, discussion of their distribution within
Testudinoidea, and polarity determinations for 93 characters are provided. Our preliminary results indicate that onto-
genetic changes in skeletal structure are an important source of variation within Testudinoidea. Sexual variation, onto-
genetic variation, and intra- and inter-population variation are inadequately documented for most testudinoid taxa.
Furthermore, data matrices of morphologic characters in the existing literature must be carefully reconsidered.
Previously published morphologic data provide reasonably strong support for the monophyly of 'Testudinidae.' Strong
morphologic support for a monophyletic 'Emydidae' is lacking, and 'batagurid' monophyly has not been rigorously
tested in the literature. Because a new research cycle centered on testudinoid phylogeny is now under way, it is essen-
tial to critically re-examine the underlying assumptions and working hypotheses that have governed this field of study
over the last 20 years.
Key words. - Testudines, Testudinoidea, Testudinidae, Emydidae, Bataguridae, Geoemydidae, morphology, systemat-
ics.
Introduction
Pond turtles and land tortoises (collectively,
Testudinoidea) form one of the largest and most wide-
spread clades of living turtles, with more than 140 extant
species and an almost worldwide distribution. The dis-
covery and description of many new fossil testudinoids
in the last half century, combined with the emergence
and ascendancy of molecular techniques in systematics,
provide new opportunities to explore the evolutionary
history of the group in unprecedented detail.
Concomitant with the appearance of these new data sets
and analytical techniques comes an increasing apprecia-
tion for conservation efforts to preserve these turtle lin-
eages and help to secure their future in the face of
increasing human predation and habitat encroachment.
This is true especially for the Asian representatives of
this clade (e.g., van Dijk et al., 2000) but also is relevant
at a more generalized and inclusive level (e.g., Rhodin,
2000).
Our recent attempts to diagnose fossil testudinoids
reliably and to place them within a phylogenetic context
led to the recognition that a critical re-evaluation of mor-
phological data and purported synapomorphies for the
subclades of testudinoid turtles is desirable. A more
thorough understanding of morphological data sets will
provide not only a means by which molecular trees may
be independently assessed, but also will form an essen-
tial foundation for diagnosing and interpreting fossil
specimens. This in turn will facilitate the integration of
fossil taxa into future systematic analyses, and will
enhance our understanding of the paleobiogeography
and divergence times of extant lineages.
The recent flurry of published works appears to rep-
resent the beginning of a new research cycle ( sensu
Kluge, 1991) in testudinoid systematics. We suggest that
an important part of this cycle will be a critical re-exam-
ination of the working hypotheses that have governed
testudinoid systematics since the publication of
McDowell’s (1964) seminal work on the group. A key
component of this will be the assessment of fundamen-
tal, often unstated, assumptions that underlie current
hypotheses of relationship. Our contribution to this
research cycle is the first critical reappraisal of morpho-
logical characters applied to testudinoid systematics
since the work of Hirayama (1985). The emerging
improvement in our understanding of testudinoid rela-
tionships based on molecular sequence data will certain-
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 54
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
ly result in numerous new questions (e.g., regarding
paleobiogeography, the timing of sequence and evolu-
tionary divergences, and the evolution of morphological
adaptations) that will demand a clearer understanding of
testudinoid morphology.
The purpose of this paper is to present a preliminary
revision and discussion of the morphological characters
previously utilized in investigations of testudinoid sys-
tematics. Our goal here is not to produce a phylogenetic
hypothesis (indeed, we deliberately eschew such a pro-
duction), but rather to evaluate the morphological data
that have been, and will be, used to generate such
hypotheses. To enhance our discussion and facilitate
improved communication about testudinoid morpholo-
gy, we provide illustrations of all characters states we
discuss.
Abbreviations. - Institution and collection abbrevia-
tions: CAS, California Academy of Sciences, San
Francisco, California; CM, Carnegie Museum of Natural
History, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; FMNH, Field
Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois; IVPP,
Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and
Paleoanthropology, Beijing, China; KU, The University
of Kansas Natural History Museum, Lawrence, Kansas;
LMNH, Louisiana Museum of Natural History, Baton
Rouge, Louisiana; MCZ, Museum of Comparative
Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge,
Massachusetts; TNHC, Texas Natural History
Collections, Texas Memorial Museum, Austin, Texas;
TUMNH, Tulane University Museum of Natural
History, New Orleans, Louisiana; YPM, Yale Peabody
Museum, New Haven, Connecticut.
Abbreviations used in figures: AB, abdominal
scute; af, articular facet; an, angular; bo, basioccipital;
CE, cervical scute; co, costal bone; ent, entoplastron;
epi, epipterygoid; fdm, foramen dentofaciale majus; fr,
frontal; fpp, foramen palatinum posterius; HU, humeral
scute; hyo, hyoplastron; hypo, hypoplastron; ju, jugal;
MA, marginal scute; mx, maxilla; ne, neural bone; pa,
parietal; pal, palatine; PEC, pectoral scute; pf, pre-
frontal; PL, pleural scute; pm, premaxilla; po, postor-
bital; pt, pterygoid; qj, quadratojugal; qu, quadrate; VE,
vertebral scute; vf, vomerine foramen; vo, vomer.
Material and Methods
We examined 309 testudinoid specimens representing
93 species, but focused our efforts on 46 representative
species. The list of specimens examined is provided in
Appendix 1. Turtle shell nomenclature follows Zangerl
(1969) and cranial nomenclature follows Gaffney
(1972). Of the 46 focal species, most were recognized as
valid species by Ernst and Barbour (1989), with the
exception of texana, which they placed within ‘ concin -
na .’ Generic allocations for testudinoid species varied
widely over the last 50 years and are subject to differing
opinions today, particularly because the monophyly of
many testudinoid genera remains untested. We conse-
quently suppress the use of generic names wherever pos-
sible and use species epithets only. This procedure also
has the advantage of precisely associating observations
with species only instead of higher taxonomic cate-
gories. Most extant turtles have distinct species names,
but among those turtles discussed in this review the
species epithets insculpta, nelsoni , oculifera , ornata,
and platynota each appear twice ( insculpta under
Glyptemys and Carettochelys; nelsoni under Pseudemys
and Terrapene\ oculifera under Graptemys and
Psammobates\ ornata under Pseudemys and Terrapene;
platynota under Geochelone and Notochelys ). For clari-
ty in these instances, we indicate our usage with a sin-
gle-letter generic abbreviation. A complete list of all cur-
rently recognized testudinoid species and all outgroup
species used herein is provided in Appendix 2 together
with a list of their various generic assignments used in
the last 50 years.
Our use of the classic higher categories is always
restricted to their phylogentic crown. ‘Emydinae’ (sensu
McDowell, 1964) are also referred to as ‘Emydidae,’
‘emydids,’ or North American pond turtles;
‘Batagurinae’ (sensu McDowell, 1964) as ‘Bataguridae,’
‘batagurids’ or Asian pond turtles; and ‘Testudinidae’
(sensu McDowell, 1964) as ‘testudinids’ or (land) tor-
toises. We make no a priori assumptions of monophyly
for any of these categories, and retain single quotations
around these names throughout the text to emphasize
our uncertainty.
We attempted to examine most significant morpho-
logical characters commonly utilized in systematic stud-
ies of testudinoids, but the majority of our observations
concern the skeletal system and scute characters. Almost
all characters were derived from the literature. Major
sources for each category were: ‘Batagurinae’
(Hirayama, 1985; McCord et al., 1995; Yasukawa et ah,
2001); ‘Testudinidae’ (Crumly, 1982, 1985, 1994); and
‘Emydinae’ (Gaffney and Meylan, 1988; Burke et ah,
1996). Additional characters were also found in
Mlynarski (1976), Shaffer et ah (1997), and other
sources cited in the character discussions. With few
exceptions, morphological features were examined on
specimens themselves; evaluations based on previously
published literature are indicated where applicable.
Sexual dimorphism, ontogenetically influenced poly-
morphisms, and geographic variation in morphology are
not well explored in testudinoid turtles. These areas are
in need of much more research. A full exploration of
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 55
such variation is beyond the scope of this work, but we
aie able to make some preliminary observations regard-
ing morphological change through ontogeny in some
anatomical systems.
Polarizing characters with the help of outgroups
proved to be a difficult task, mostly because all relevant
extant sister taxa are highly specialized after more than
65 million years of independent evolution. Furthermore,
hypotheses of the systematic relationships of the major
groups of cryptodires reveal a highly unstable picture
(e.g., Bickham, 1981; Gaffney, 1975, 1985; Gaffney et
al., 1991; Shaffer et al., 1997) making it impossible to
make any a priori decisions regarding the succession of
outgroups. We consequently assessed polarity for most
characters by examining select outgroup taxa and the
ingroup taxa. Where polarity is not clear from outgroup
comparison, we sometimes relied upon ingroup com-
monality. To allow full transparency, we discuss every
polarity decision at the end of each character descrip-
tion.
Outgroup taxa include the cryptodires caretta ,
odoratus, serpentina , and spinifera, and the pleurodires
gibba , siebenrocki, subglobosa, and subrufa. For a num-
ber of characters, especially of the shell, neither ingroup
nor outgroup analysis of extant taxa proved useful. In
these instances, polarity was based on literature descrip-
tions of the “lindholmemydid” taxa Gravemys,
Lindholmemys , and Mongolemys . These Cretaceous,
Asian, fossil taxa are not well described in the literature,
but sufficient material and description exists to use these
taxa to help polarize character states (e.g., Khosatzky
and Mlynarski, 1971; Sukhanov, 2000; Danilov and
Sukhanov, 2001). The group may not be monophyletic,
but putative members currently are hypothesized to sit
along the phylogentic stem of Testudinoidea (Danilov
and Sukhanov, 2001). We purposefully did not use the
fossil taxon ‘ Echmatemys’ as an outgroup taxon
(Hirayama, 1985), because its phylogenetic position out-
side of Testudinoidea or even ‘Batagurinae’ is not suffi-
ciently demonstrated.
All figures were produced using digital photogra-
phy and processed using Adobe Photoshop. Images were
digitally enhanced using the burn and burnish tools and
the unsharp mask filter option.
Taxonomic and Systematic Background. - Despite the
increased attention directed towards testudinoids by sci-
entists, hobbyists, and nonprofessional enthusiasts in the
last thirty-five years, our collective conceptualization of
the higher-level (beyond the specific and generic) sys-
tematics within this clade remained virtually unchanged
since the work of McDowell (1964). The various tax-
onomies in current use owe their existence in large part
to historical contexts that are not well appieciated by
many authors. A brief summary is given here.
During the second half of the 19th century, a num-
ber of attempts were made to work out higher-level tes-
tudinoid relationships and to apply taxonomic conven-
tions that were designed (to a greater or lesser extent) to
communicate conceptualizations of these relationships.
In his synopsis on the turtles of North America, Agassiz
(1857) united all pond turtles into the Emydoidae and
subdivided this group into a three monotypic subfami-
lies (Deirochelyoidae for reticularia, Evemydoidae for
blandingii, Cistudinina for T. ornata and Carolina ) fol-
lowed by the subfamilies Clemmydoidae (for G. insculp-
ta, guttata, marmorata, and muhlenbergii ) and
Nectemydoidae (for those species currently placed in the
genera Pseudemys, Trachemys, Graptemys , Malaclemys
and Chrysemys). Most land tortoises were placed in
Testudinidae by Theobald (1868); he also included all
‘leaf turtles and tortoises’ (e.g., amboinensis, emys, den-
tata, grandis, tricarinata ) in Geoemydidae, and an
eclectic group of aquatic turtles, including mega-
cephalum, serpentina, kinostemids, and all remaining
testudinoids, in Emydidae. Subsequently, all land tor-
toises (including emys and impressa) were united in the
Testudinidae by Gray (1870). Those species currently
placed in Pseudemys and Trachemys were assigned by
Gray (1870) to the Pseudemydae; the Asian taxa baska,
borneoensis, thurjii, kachuga, and ocellata were
assigned to the Bataguridae, and all hinged pond turtles,
‘true terrapins,’ and ‘snail-eating pond turtles’ to the
Holarctic families Cistudinidae, Emydidae, and
Malaclemmydae, respectively.
Despite these early attempts, most subsequent
authors (e.g., Boulenger, 1889; Siebenrock, 1909;
Lindholm, 1929; Smith, 1931; Bourret, 1941) ignored
(or were unaware of) these works and simply divided all
testudinoid turtles into two speciose subgroups: tortois-
es (Testudinidae or Testudininae) and pond turtles
(Emydidae or Emydinae). This situation remained static
for nearly 100 years until the comprehensive and influ-
ential work of McDowell (1964). He not only divided all
known pond turtles into several species complexes
(‘ Hardella,' ‘ Batagur ,’ ‘ Orlitia ,’ ‘ Geoemyda ,’
‘ Chrysemys ,’ ‘ Deirochelys,' and ‘ Emys ’ complexes), but
also concluded that pond turtles can be divided clearly
into two subgroups, the predominantly North American
‘Emydinae’ and the Asian and central American
‘Batagurinae.’ Furthermore, McDowell (1964) reasoned
that tortoises are not the sister group of pond turtles, but
rather were likely derived from a ‘batagurine’ ancestor.
These conclusions were later corroborated by the first,
and to date only, comprehensive morphological cladistic
analysis of ‘batagurine’ systematics (Hirayama, 1985).
The influence of McDowell’s (1964) work is best
understood when considering its continuous impact on
Vol. 10, p. 56
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
subsequently proposed phylogenies. Despite differences
of opinion regarding generic- and species-level system-
atic arrangements, virtually all major synthetic works in
the last thirty years followed McDowell’s (1964) subdi-
vision of pond turtles into the ‘Batagurinae’ and
‘Emydinae' (e.g., Mlynarski, 1976; Pritchard, 1979;
Ernst and Barbour, 1989), even though 'Batagurinae’
may best be regarded as a paraphyletic taxon
(McDowell, 1964; Hirayama, 1985). The fundamental
division proposed by McDowell is also reflected in more
recent studies centered on using various molecular tech-
niques to elucidate phylogeny, the majority of which
dealt with treatments of in-group relationships within
one or the other of McDowell’s groups (Sites et al.,
1984; Bickham et al., 1996; Carr and Bickham, 1986;
Wu et al., 1999; McCord et al., 2000; Feldman and
Parham, 2002; Honda et al., 2002; Iverson et al., 2002;
Stephens and Wiens, 2003).
Admittedly, the list of autapomorphic characters
compiled by Crumly (1985) for the ‘Testudininae’ com-
pellingly corroborates the hypothesis of tortoise mono-
phyly. However, most characters that currently unite
‘Emydinae’ or ‘Batagurinae + Testudininae’ seem to
support these groupings weakly, because the derived
states typically are not found within all species of the
ingroup and commonly also are observed in species of
the alleged sister group (e.g., Hirayama, 1985; Gaffney
and Meylan, 1988). In addition, several of the characters
that purportedly distinguish ‘Batagurinae +
Testudininae’ from the ‘Emydinae’ probably should be
considered primitive for the entire group (Gaffney and
Meylan, 1988). Even if some characters do successfully
unite a group, monophyly is not established until the
involved characters are demonstrated to be derived with-
in Testudinoidea. Furthermore, the simple demonstra-
tion of monophyly for a given group does not automati-
cally imply that it must be the sister to the remaining
taxa. For instance, ‘Emydinae’ may be monophyletic,
but monophyly does not necessarily demand that
‘Emydinae’ be regarded as the sister to ‘Batagurinae +
Testudininae.’ It is at least plausible that ‘Emydinae’ is
situated within ‘Batagurinae,’ a possibility that is not
adequately explored and tested in the literature.
Similarly, most of the groupings considered by
Gray (1855, 1870) and Agassiz (1857) were not dis-
cussed in recent literature, even though they might be
valid. For instance, given the considerable list of mor-
phological similarities that are shared by hinged turtles
of the New and Old World (e.g., development of a plas-
tral hinge, reduction of posterior neural elements, fusion
of the femoral trochanter, great reduction of the tempo-
ral arch) perhaps Gray (1870) was truly visionary in
uniting these turtles as the ‘Cistudinidae.’ Only a global
cladistic analysis with no a priori assumption regarding
internal relationships can evaluate these alternatives and
produce testable results. It is toward this end that we
offer our critical reappraisal of morphological characters
in testudinoids.
Results and Discussion
Cranium
(1) Shape of the fissura ethmoidalis; 0 = narrow or
closed, keyhole-shaped, Fig. 1; l = very wide, Fig. 2
(modified from Crumly, 1982, 13; Hirayama, 1985, 1;
McCord et al., 1995, 5).
The general configuration of the fissura in ‘emy-
dids’ and ‘batagurids’ is keyhole-shaped (McDowell,
1964). Different proportions and widths are apparent
(especially in the ventral part of the fissura), and were
scored by Hirayama (1985) and Crumly (1982) as dis-
crete character states. Our survey of many taxa reveals
morphological intermediates, and the expression of var-
ious states appears to have an ontogenetic component in
which younger individuals exhibit a relatively larger fis-
sura, which corresponds to a less-ossified nasal cavity.
However, a rather significant morphological gap can be
observed between tortoises and pond turtles. For the
purpose of this review, we lumped Hirayama’s (1985)
states into our state 0, and Crumly ’s (1982) into our state
1. The scoring presented by Hirayama (1985) and
McCord et al. (1995) permitted phylogenetic resolution
within ‘batagurids’, and that of Crumly (1982) within
tortoises. Our revised scoring permits support only for
the hypothesis of a monophyletic ‘Testudinidae.’
Polarity: Pleurodires lack a defined fissura eth-
moidalis. A keyhole-shaped fissura ethmoidalis is pres-
ent in spinifera, odoratus, caretta, serpentina , and
Mongolemys, and this condition is considered primitive
for testudinoids.
(2) Medial inflection of the inferior descending process-
es of the frontal; 0 = absent, or very small, Fig. 3; 1 =
present, well-developed, medial contact present or
almost present, Fig. 4 (modified from Hirayama, 1985,
2).
In most turtles, a gutter (the sulcus olfactorius) is
formed along the ventral surface of the ffontals. This
gutter transmits the olfactory nerve. The lateral rims of
the sulcus sometimes form processes that descend ven-
tromedially to surround the nerve from below
(McDowell, 1964). According to Hirayama (1985) these
processes are well-developed, or are in contact medially,
in ocellata and hamiltonii. We confirm the presence of
well-developed processes in these taxa and add petersi,
N. platynota, and all sampled tortoises to the list. We
recommend that this character not be subdivided into
additional character states, because the descending
processes of the ffontals grow larger through ontogeny.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 57
Polarity: A medial inflection is absent in all out-
groups and the vast majority of the ingroup. We consid-
er its presence to be derived.
(j) Frontal contribution to the orbital rim; 0 — present,
no prefrontal/postorbital contact on dorsal surface, Fig.
5; 1 = absent, frontal excluded from orbital rim by pre-
frontal/postorbital contact, Fig. 6 (modified from
Crumly, 1982, 17; Hirayama, 1985, 3; Shaffer et al.,
1997, 97; Yasukawa et al, 2001, 1).
Three states for this character were scored by
Hirayama (1985) and Yasukawa et al. (2001): frontal
contribution always or usually present, frontal some-
times excluded from orbital rim, and frontal always
excluded from orbital rim. Our sample size for many
taxa does not permit a reliable assessment of intraspecif-
ic variation in this character, and thus our initial scores
differed for some taxa from those of Hirayama (1985).
We add peter si and N. platynota to the list of taxa in
which the frontal appears always to be excluded. For
those taxa that sometimes exclude the frontals, we con-
firm this polymorphic condition in crassicollis, and add
agassizii and annulata. Our sample was too small to
confirm the reported polymorphic condition in
amboinensis , and pulcherrima by Hirayama (1985) and
Yasukawa et al. (2001), but we scored these taxa as
polymorphic based on their observations. We also fol-
lowed Crumly (1982) by coding pardalis as polymor-
phic, even though we were not able to observe this in our
sample. Our coding differs from that of Shaffer et al.
(1997) for Heosemys and reeves ii. In their analysis, they
used spinosa (in which the frontal contributes to the
orbital rim), but we used grandis (in which it does not).
In both specimens of reevesii available to us, the frontal
clearly does not participate in the orbital margin. Given
the contrary statement by Shaffer et al. (1997), reevesii
may be polymorphic for this character.
Polarity: The frontal participates in the orbital rim
in pleurodires and spinifera , it is excluded in odoratus
and caretta, and it is polymorphic in serpentina. No pat-
tern is apparent within the ingroup. Given that the
frontal clearly contributes to the orbital rim in
Mongolemys, we consider its absence to be derived.
(4) Contact between jugal and pterygoid; 0 = present,
medial process of jugal well-developed and touching the
pterygoid, Fig. 7; 1 = absent, medial process reduced,
Fig. 8 (modified from Hirayama, 1985, 11, 12; McCord
et al., 1995, 3; Burke et al, 1996, 23; Yasukawa et al,
2001, 4, 5).
The jugal of most testudinoid turtles is expanded at
its ventral end to form a medial process that contacts the
pterygoid medially (McDowell, 1964). Presence or
absence of the medial process, and presence or absence
of a medial contact with the pterygoid were treated as
two characters by Hirayama (1985) and Yasukawa et al.
(2001). The scoring for the two characters appears to be
redundant and we followed the recommendation of
Gaffney and Meylan (1988) by combining them.
We confirm the loss of a medial contact between the
jugal and the pterygoid in galbinifrons, flavomarginata,
and mouhotii (Hirayama, 1985; Yasukawa et al., 2001),
but we found this condition to be polymorphic in speng-
leri (also reported by McCord et al., 1995), and in triju-
ga. Our observations are concordant with those of Burke
et al. (1996).
Polarity: A contact between the jugal and pterygoid
in present in spinifera , odoratus, and serpentina , but is
absent (although the two bones closely approach one
another) in caretta. We conclude that the contact
between the two bones is the primitive condition for tes-
tudinoids and that their separation is derived, a conclu-
sion also reached by Hirayama (1985). Our polarity
determination is opposite that used by McCord et al.
(1995), who mistakenly claimed to have derived their
polarity assessment from Hirayama (1985).
(5) Contact between jugal and palatine; 0 = absent, Fig.
9; 1 = present, Fig. 10 (Gaffney and Meylan, 1988,
F5.4).
The presence of a contact between the medial
process of the jugal and the palatine was used previous-
ly in support of a monophyletic Deirochelyinae
(Gaffney and Meylan, 1988). We confirm the formerly
observed distribution of this character within ‘emydids’
with the exception of reticularia, which does not exhib-
it a contact. A contact is present in numerous
‘batagurids,’ such as borneoensis, reevesii, and hamil-
tonii, but was absent in all examined members of
‘Testudinidae.’
Polarity: A contact between the jugal and the pala-
tine is present in caretta, odoratus, and pleurodires, but
is absent in spinifera and serpentina. A contact is absent
in Mongolemys. We consequently consider its presence
to be derived.
(6) Contact of the epipterygoid with the jugal; 0 = clear-
ly absent, Fig. 11; 1 = present, or almost present,
epipterygoid forms a long lateral process that approach-
es the jugal, Fig. 12 (Gaffney and Meylan, 1988, F8.1;
Shaffer et al., 1997, 106).
According to Gaffney and Meylan (1988) the
epipterygoid and the medial process of the jugal
approach one another or are in contact in reticularia and
the various species they included in Pseudemys and
Trachemys. They also noted a contact between these two
elements in species they classified in Graptemys, but the
condition in those taxa was interpreted to be a result of
Vol. 10, p. 58
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
the medial expansion of the jugal and not a lateral
expansion of the epipterygoid, and consequently was
regarded as non-homologous (Gaffney and Meylan,
1988). We confirm the contact or near contact of these
two elements in reticularia, decor ata, scripta, alaba-
mensis, P. nelsoni, rubriventris, texana , flavimaculata,
geographica , kohnii, nigrinoda , G. ocidifera, ouachiten-
sis, and versa , and also report it in picta and terrapin.
Contact was clearly absent in the specimens of harbour i,
ernsti, and gibbonsi we examined. We made no assess-
ments of homology, but accept any contact between
these two elements as the derived state (as was done by
Shaffer et al., 1997). Among ‘batagurids,’ we also found
a close approach in reevesii.
Polarity: A contact, or near contact, between the
epipterygoid and the jugal is absent in all outgroups and
the vast majority of the ingroup. We consider its pres-
ence to be derived.
(7) Contact of the inferior process of the parietal with
the medial process of the jugal; 0 = absent, Fig. 13; 1 =
present, Fig. 14 (Hirayama, 1985, 13).
Our coding differs significantly from that of
Hirayama (1985). In reevesii , N. platynota, and bealei
we found no contact between the parietal and jugal,
although these were the only three taxa in which
Hirayama (1985: table 2) scored it to be present.
However, we found a pronounced contact between these
two elements in subtrijuga, a species scored by
Hirayama (1985: table 2) as lacking such a contact, but
shown on his tree (Hirayama, 1985: fig. 2) as a unique
‘batagurid’ feature convergent with some ‘emydids.’
Among ‘emydids,’ a well-developed contact occurs in
barbouri and other broad-headed species currently clas-
sified in Graptemys.
Polarity: There is no contact between the inferior
process of the parietal and the medial process of the
jugal in all outgroups and the vast majority of the
ingroup. A contact is considered to be the derived condi-
tion.
(8) Contact of the inferior process of the parietal with
the maxilla; 0 = absent, Fig. 13; 1 = present, Fig. 14
( Hirayama , 1985, 14).
Our coding differs from that of Hirayama (1985).
According to his character matrix (table 2) a contact
should be present between the inferior process of the
parietal and the maxilla in reevesii and mouhotii, but his
cladogram (fig. 2) indicated that the presence of a con-
tact should be regarded as a uniquely derived autapo-
morphy of subtrijuga. We found no contact in reevesii or
mouhotii. Of the testudinoid species we examined, sub-
trijuga is the only one that shows this feature.
Polarity: There is no contact between the inferior
process of the parietal and the maxilla in all outgroups.
Its presence is considered to be derived.
(9) Extent of quadratojugal; 0 = quadratojugal well
developed, firmly attached to jugal, Fig. 15; 1 = quadra-
tojugal present, contact lost with jugal, Fig. 16; 2 =
quadratojugal so heavily reduced that it appears to be
absent in many skeletal specimens, Figs. 17, 18 (modi-
fied from Hirayama, 1985, 16; Shaffer et al., 1997, 47;
Burke et al., 1996, 21; McCord et al., 1995, 6; Yasukawa
et al., 2001, 7, 8).
Variation in the structure of the temporal region of
turtles was discussed in detail by Zdansky (1924) and
comments specific to testudinoids were provided by
Zangerl (1948) and McDowell (1964). We originally
scored the reduction of the quadratojugal as three differ-
ent characters: loss of contact with the jugal, loss of con-
tact with the squamosal, and the apparent loss of the
quadratojugal. All five logically possible combinations
were observed, but in most testudinoid turtles the tem-
poral arch is so slender that the contact between the
quadratojugal and squamosal is commonly reduced to a
sliver that would have to be scored as ‘just barely pres-
ent’ or ‘just barely absent.’ We therefore abandoned our
efforts to evaluate the contact between the quadratojugal
and squamosal. Our observations generally agree with
those of McDowell (1964), Hirayama (1985), Burke et
al., (1996), McCord et al. (1995), and Yasukawa et al.
(2001).
We purposefully avoid addressing the apparent lack
of a quadratojugal in many species as an absence,
because previous work by Zdansky (1924) showed that
the quadratojugal of some ‘batagurids’ is so poorly ossi-
fied and connected to the surrounding elements that it
tends to be lost in skeletal specimens (Figs. 17, 18). An
example of this problem can be found among the many
conflicting statements made regarding the presence of
this element in N. platynota (e.g., Smith, 1931; Bourret,
1941; McDowell, 1964; Ernst and Barbour, 1989).
Polarity: The quadratojugal is present and firmly
attached to the jugal in all outgroups, with the exception
of chelids. Its reduction is considered to be derived.
(10) Contribution of jugal to the rim of upper temporal
emargination (Hirayama, 1985, 15); 0 = absent, Figs.
19, 20; 1 = present, Fig. 21.
Participation of the jugal in the rim of the upper
temporal emargination was reported previously in
hamiltonii and ocellata (Hirayama, 1985). We confirm
its presence in both species, but in one of the hamiltonii
specimens we examined (MCZ 120333) the jugal forms
a significant part of the rim only on one side of the skull;
on the other side, which appears abnormal and likely
represents a teratology, it does not. In all other species
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 59
available to us, the jugal does not participate in the rim.
In subtrijuga, the jugal is excluded from the upper tem-
poral emargination by narrow extensions of the postor-
bital and quadratojugal (Fig. 20).
Polarity: The jugal participates in the upper tempo-
ral rim ot spinifera , but it is excluded in odoratus, caret-
ta , serpentina , Mongolemys , and most pleurodires. We
consider the participation of the jugal in the rim of the
upper temporal emargination to be the derived condition
within testudinoids.
(11) Contact between the quadratojugal and the articu-
lar facet of the quadrate; 0 = absent, Fig. 22; l = pres-
ent, quadratojugal sends a process ventrally along the
rim of the cavum tympani and touches the lateral edge
of the articular facet, Fig. 23 (modified from Hirayama,
1985, 17).
The original character definition (Hirayama, 1985,
character 1 7) is inappropriate, because the jugal does not
contact the articular surface of the quadrate in any turtle
except for madagascariensis and dumerilianus (Gaffney
and Meylan, 1988). However, because Hirayama indi-
cated in his tree that the only ‘batagurid’ taxon to exhib-
it this character is subtrijuga , we assume that he was
referring to a contact between the quadratojugal and the
articular facet of the quadrate, a characteristic of subtri-
juga only among testudinoids. A contact between the
two elements was reported previously for reevesii in the
character matrix published by Hirayama (1985), but we
conclude that this must be a publishing error, because it
stands in conflict with his tree. In the specimens of
reevesii available to us, there is no contact. It is possible
that the scoring for subtrijuga and reevesii were flipped,
at least in part, in the Hirayama (1985) matrix (in which
the taxa were listed next to one another).
Polarity: A contact between the quadratojugal and
the articular surface of the quadrate is absent in
spinifera , but present in odoratus , caretta, and serpenti-
na, and consequently could be considered primitive.
However, based on ingroup commonality and the
absence of a contact in Mongolemys , we consider a con-
tact to be derived for Testudinoidea.
(12) Contact between quadratojugal and maxilla; 0 =
absent, Fig. 22; 1 = present, Figs. 23, 24 (Hirayama,
1985, 18).
According to Hirayama (1985), among ‘batagurids’
a contact between the quadratojugal and maxilla is only
present in subtrijuga and reevesii. We did not find a
contact in our specimens of reevesii , but confirm its
presence in subtrijuga.
Gaffney and Meylan (1988) listed a contact
between the quadratojugal and maxilla as a synapomor-
phy for Platystemina {megacephalum + ‘ Chelydropsis'}
and as an independently evolved synapomorphy for
Kinostemidae, whereas Shaffer et al. (1997) noted a
contact to be present in Kinostemidae, C. insculpta, and
megacephalum. Our observations confirm the presence
of a contact in all of these extant groups. Among testudi-
noids, subtrijuga is unique in having an extensive con-
tact in lateral view (Fig. 23). In several ‘emydids,’ a con-
tact is present on the inside of the temporal arch ( bar -
bouri, and nigrinoda; polymorphic in geographica , G.
oculifera, and texana; Fig. 24). For now, we scored all
taxa as present, regardless of whether the contact is vis-
ible in lateral view, medial view, or both. In several other
‘emydid’ taxa, the bones closely approach one another,
but do not actually meet, on the inside of the temporal
arch ( alabamensis , ernsti, flavimaculata, gibbonsi,
kohnii, P. nelsoni ).
Polarity: A contact is present between the quadrato-
jugal and maxilla in odoratus, but absent in spinifera,
caretta, serpentina, and Mongolemys. We consider the
presence of a contact to be derived for Testudinoids.
(13) Medial contact of the maxillae along the anterior
margin of the jaw; 0 = absent, Figs. 25, 26; 1 = present,
Fig. 27 (modified from Hirayama, 1985, 20; McCord et
al., 1995, 2; Yasukawa et al., 2001, 10).
In most testudinoids, the anteromedial ends of the
maxillae are separated medially by the premaxillae
along the anterior margin of the jaw (Fig. 25). Hirayama
(1985) noted that the maxillae have a medial contact in
some ‘batagurids,’ which was confirmed by McCord et
al. (1995) and Yasukawa et al. (2001) for spengleri and
several other species that they included in the genus
Geoemyda. We found a broad medial contact of the max-
illae in spengleri and annulata (Fig. 27). In some
species, the maxillae approach one another along the
ventral rim of the nasal opening (e.g., amboinensis,
mouhotii, pulcherrima, crassicollis ), but a well-devel-
oped contact is never present (Fig. 26).
Polarity: The maxillae do not meet medially along
the anterior margin of the jaw in odoratus, caretta , ser-
pentina, and Mongolemys. A medial contact is present in
spinifera but only along the ventral border of the exter-
nal nares. We consider a medial contact along the ante-
rior margin of the jaw to be the derived condition with-
in Testudinoidea.
(14) Size of the foramen orbito-nasale; 0 = small, less
than 1/6 of orbit length, Figs. 28, 29; 1 = large, more
than 1/6 of orbit length, Fig. 30 (modified from
Hirayama, 1985, 33; Gaffney and Meylan, 1988, F9.3,
FI 0.2, G10.3, HI 1.1, HI 6.3; Crumly, 1982, 25; Crumly,
1994, 12).
We were cautious when first approaching this char-
acter due to the inconsistent usage and definition of
Vol. 10, p. 60
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
small and ‘large’ by various authors. However, after
assessing the size ot this foramen based on its size rela-
tive to the length of the orbit, we were surprised to see
that we were able to reproduce Hirayama’s (1985) scor-
ing for the ‘batagurids’ without too many difficulties. In
contrast, our initial observations of tortoises were in
stark contrast to those of Crumly (1982, 1985, 1994) and
Gaffney and Meylan (1988). This may be due to the thin
nature of the palatine of many tortoises, and the relative
ease with which that part of the palate can be damaged
during skeletal preparation and handling. Furthermore,
the foramen becomes progressively more closed with
increased ontogenetic age (Crumly, 1982). We encoun-
tered similar problems in attempting to score reticularia
and blandingii. Because we deem this character to be
potentially useful for helping to resolve phylogeny with-
in ‘batagurids’ and ‘emydids,’ we decided to score all
testudinoids with delicate palatines (i.e., all tortoises,
reticularia , and blandingii ) as ‘unknown.’ We acknowl-
edge that our redefinition of the character is still subjec-
tive and somewhat problematic, but using this definition
we were able to unambiguously score all the ingroup
taxa we examined.
Polarity: The foramen orbito-nasale is large in ser-
pentina, odoratus, and spinifera, but small in caretta.
We consider presence of a large foramen orbito-nasale to
be the derived condition within testudinoids, because the
foramen is small in Mongolemys.
(15) Contact between maxilla and vomer; 0 = present,
Fig. 31; 1 = absent, vomer separated from the maxilla
by the premaxilla, Fig. 32 (Hirayama, 1985, 31; Crumly,
1982, 21; Yasukawa et al., 2001, 14).
We generally agree with previous scorings for this
character (Hirayama, 1985, Crumly, 1982, Yasukawa et
al., 2001). We confirm the absence of a contact in
amboinensis and pulcherrima, but our scoring differs
slightly for those taxa that Hirayama (1985) coded as
‘intermediate apomorphic,’ a character state that we
interpret as polymorphism. Of those taxa that Hirayama
(1985) and Yasukawa et al. (2001) scored as intermedi-
ate (flavomarginata, caspica, annulata ), our sample size
is too small to confirm whether both character states are
present. We consequently follow these authors by scor-
ing those taxa as polymorphic.
Polarity: A contact between the maxilla and vomer
is present in all outgroups. The loss of this contact is
derived for testudinoids.
(16) Size of the foramen palatinum poster ius; 0 = large,
Fig. 33; 1 = small, Fig. 34 (modified from Hirayama,
1985, 22; Gaffney and Meylan, 1988, F2.2, F6.1;
McCord et al., 1995, 4; Yasukawa et al., 2001, 12).
Our characters 16 and 17 were published originally
by Hirayama (1985) as one character that combined two
morphological features: the size of the foramen palat-
inum posterius (f.p.p.) and participation of the pterygoid
in the margin of the f.p.p. Although four possible com-
binations of these features are logically possible, only
two were originally included (participation present,
f.p.p. large; participation absent, f.p.p. small). Gaffney
and Meylan (1988) also used this character within ‘emy-
dids,’ but their character applied only to the exclusion of
the pterygoid from the f.p.p. We decided to subdivide
Hirayama’s (1985) character into one character that
describes the size of the f.p.p. and a second that address-
es the position of the pterygoid relative to the f.p.p.
We found no difficulty in identifying the f.p.p. as
‘large’ or ‘small,’ (Figs. 33 and 34, respectively), and no
ambiguous condition was encountered. Because our
character definition only includes two character states,
our scorings do not reflect those of other workers with a
more limited target group (e.g., McCord et al., 1995). In
juveniles the f.p.p. tends to be larger, but during later
ontogenetic stages the f.p.p. is slowly reduced in size.
Polarity: The f.p.p. is small in odoratus, spinifera,
and most pleurodires; it is absent in caretta, but is large
in serpentina and Mongolemys. We consider a small
f.p.p. to be the derived state.
(17) Position of the pterygoid relative to foramen palat-
inum posterius (f.p.p.); 0 = pterygoid situated posterior
to the f.p.p., Fig. 33; 1 = pterygoid situated posterior to
the f.p.p., but sends a process anterior and lateral to the
f.p.p., Fig. 34.
Our survey of testudinoids indicated that reliable
assessment of participation of the pterygoid in the f.p.p.
may be difficult because many species show an ontoge-
netic change in configuration of this part of the palate. In
juveniles, the f.p.p. typically includes the pterygoid in its
posterior margin. During later ontogenetic stages the
pterygoid is excluded. In spite of this, it appears that the
relative position of the pterygoid tends to stay constant
during ontogeny.
Polarity: The anterior end of the pterygoid is situat-
ed posterior to the f.p.p. in odoratus, serpentina, most
pleurodires, and Mongolemys, but is situated lateral to
the f.p.p. in spinifera. We consider a posterior position to
be primitive for Testudinoidea.
(18) Epipterygoid participation in the trigeminal fora-
men; 0 = absent, Fig. 35; 1 = present, epipterygoid
clearly separates the parietal and pterygoid in lateral
view, Fig. 36.
The anteroventral rim of the trigeminal foramen of
most testudinoid turtles is formed by the parietal and
pterygoid. The epipterygoid commonly comes close to
the foramen, but does not form part of it. In spengleri
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 61
and mouhotii , the epipterygoid consistently participates
in the margin of the trigeminal foramen thus separating
the parietal and pterygoid, at least in lateral view.
Polarity: The epipterygoid forms part of the
anteroventral rim of the trigeminal foramen in the
majority of outgroups, with the exception of pleurodires
that lack a definitive ossified epipterygoid (Gaffney,
1979). The condition is unclear for Mongolemys.
However, within the ingroup we found this character
only in the seemingly rather specialized turtles spengleri
and mouhotii. We consequently consider its presence to
be secondarily derived.
(19) Vomerine foramen ; 0 = absent, Fig. 37; 1 = pres-
ent, Fig. 38 (Gaffney and Meylan, 1988, H4.1; Crumly,
1994, 15).
The vomerine foramen (= anteromedial vomerine
aperture of Crumly, 1982 and 1994 [in part]) is a small
opening that pierces the vomer along the midline just
posterior to the foramen praepalatinum (Bramble, 1971).
The presence of a vomerine foramen was noted in agas-
sizii and berlandieri by Bramble (1971), and was used
by Gaffney and Meylan (1988) to unite various species
currently placed in Gopherus as a clade. Its irregular
presence in elegans, elongata, chilensis, and radiata
was reported by Crumly (1982). Specimens in our sam-
ple enable us to confirm its presence in agassizii,
berlandieri , and chilensis.
Polarity: The vomerine foramen occurs in only a
few ‘testudinids’ and it is absent in all outgroups. Its
presence is considered derived for Testudinoidea.
(20) Development of the foramen praepalatinum as a
canal (canalis praepalatinum) that is concealed by a
bony secondary palate in ventral view; 0 = absent, Fig.
39; 1 = present, Fig. 40 (modified from Hirayama, 1985,
24).
In most testudinoids, the foramen praepalatinum is
a small opening that connects the nasal cavity with the
roof of the oral cavity (Fig. 39). However, in a number
of taxa with extensively developed secondary palates,
the anterior nasal artery passes through an elongated
canal that is concealed in ventral view by the bony sec-
ondary palate (e.g., baska , tentoria , petersi: ; Fig. 40). We
refer to this structure as the canalis praepalatinum. Our
scorings are fully consistent with those of Hirayama
(1985).
Polarity: The foramen praepalatinum is absent in
spinifera (Gaffney, 1979) and caretta (Nick, 1912), and
is developed as a true foramen that is exposed in ventral
view in odoratus, serpentina , and Mongolemys. The
development of a canalis praepalatinum is considered
the derived condition within Testudinoidea.
(21) Contact between pterygoid and basioccipital; 0 =
present, Fig. 41; 1 = absent, Fig. 42 (modified from
Gaffney and Meylan, 1988, FI. I, F10.3, H18.3; Crumly,
1994; Shaffer et al., 1997, 103).
Two of the most often-cited characters that purport-
edly help to distinguish the ‘Emydidae’ from the
‘Bataguridae’ are the batagurine process and the contact
between the pterygoid and the basioccipital (McDowell,
1964). Both traits are commonly combined as one char-
acter (e.g., Gaffney and Meylan, 1988) and even seem to
have been confused with one another (e.g., Mlynarski,
1976; Shaffer et al., 1997). The batagurine process is a
poorly-defined feature that, in McDowell’s original
usage (1964) appears to consist of a lateral process of
the basioccipital that floors the recessus scalae tympani.
Many testudinoid species (including non-‘batagurines’)
have a laterally-projecting process of the basioccipital; it
may or may not floor the recessus scalae tympani, but it
is often obscured from view in articulated specimens.
When disarticulated material is examined, a broader dis-
tribution of this feature (assuming it is interpreted as we
have done above) across testudinoids is revealed.
Within Testudinoidea, the pterygoid commonly
sends a process posteriorly and contacts the basioccipi-
tal just lateral to the basisphenoid. This character
appears to be absent in most ‘emydids,’ but is present in
terrapin and those species that are currently attributed to
Graptemys (Gaffney and Meylan, 1988). We noticed a
strong ontogenetic component to this character within
‘emydids.’ The pterygoid is commonly rather short dur-
ing younger ontogenetic stages, but finally reaches the
basioccipital in later stages. For instance, among our
specimens of terrapin, orbicularis , and texana, the
pterygoid does not contact the basioccipital in younger
individuals, but a clear contact is present in adults. We
score such species as polymorphic, but note that ontoge-
netically influenced polymorphisms are not well
explored in turtles.
Among ‘batagurids,’ we noted a similar pattern.
Contrary to general belief we were not able to observe a
contact between the pterygoid and the basioccipital in all
taxa traditionally classified in this group (e.g., trijuga ,
pulcherrima, sinensis). As with the ‘emydids,’ there
seems to be an ontogenetic effect in which younger
specimens tend not to have a contact. Where recognized,
we scored these species as polymorphic.
We found much conflicting data regarding the dis-
tribution of this character among tortoises (Crumly,
1982, 1985, 1994; Gaffney and Meylan, 1988). Among
the specimens we examined, we note the complete
absence of a contact only in graeca\ polymorphisms
were observed in polyphemus and horsfieldi. Again, an
ontogenetic component is apparent.
Polarity; A contact between the pterygoid and
Vol. 10, p. 62
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
basioccipital is present in all outgroups. Its absence is
considered to be derived.
(22) Contact of the pterygoid with the articular facet of
the quadrate ; 0 = absent, Fig. 43; 1 = present, Fig. 44
(Hirayama, 1985, 38).
According to the data matrix published by
Hirayama (1985) he only observed this contact in
reeves ii, however, in his tree (fig. 2) the contact is
mapped as an autapomorphy of subtrijuga. We confirm
the presence of a contact between the posterior process
of the pterygoid and the articular surface of the quadrate
in subtrijuga. It is the only taxon we examined that dis-
plays the derived condition.
Polarity: A contact between the pterygoid and the
articular surface of the quadrate is absent in all out-
groups and the vast majority of the ingroup. We consid-
er its presence to be derived.
(23) Closure and depth of the incisura columella auris;
0 = absent, incisura is open, Fig. 44; 1 = present,
incisura closed, Fig. 45 (Crumly, 1985; Gaffney and
Meylan, 1988, HI. 3).
The incisura columella auris is a notch that is
formed by the quadrate and that holds the stapes and
eustachian tube (Gaffney, 1972). In a number of turtles,
the incisura closes to fully surround the stapedial shaft
(Gaffney and Meylan, 1988). Within testudinoids, the
incisura evidently is closed in most tortoises (Crumly,
1985). We are able to confirm the presence of such a
closed incisura in all ‘testudinids’ we examined with the
exception of one specimen of kleinmanni (CAS
228431), the smallest of the species now classified in
Testudo. In a number of ‘batagurids’ and ‘emydids’ the
incisura commonly is very narrow and even appears to
be closed, however, a closer look under the microscope
combined with a probing needle reveals that this appar-
ent closure is produced by dry tissues that remain in this
area in many articulated skulls. The only ‘batagurid’ for
which we sometimes found a closed incisura is N.
platynota; in that species the quadrate does not fuse
together forming a solid ring behind the incisura, but this
is also the case for many tortoises (e.g., some belliana,
emys, some homeana, some kleinmanni). In some cases,
the polymorphism we noted (e.g., in belliana and home-
ana) appears to be a result of ontogenetic age, with older
individuals displaying a greater degree of fusion at the
posterior part of the incisura.
Polarity: The polarity of this character is somewhat
ambiguous, because the incisura columella auris is
closed in serpentina and spinifera , but open in caretta
and odoratus. We conclude that its presence is derived
within testudinoids because it is absent in Mongolemys.
Mandible
(24) Angular contribution to the sulcus cartilaginis
Meckelii; 0 = present, the angular contributes to the sul-
cus and is as long or longer than the prearticular, Fig.
47; 1 = absent, the angular is shorter than the preartic-
ular, Fig. 48 (modified from Gaffney and Meylan, 1988,
FI. 4).
A broad contact of the angular with Meckel’s carti-
lage was used by McDowell (1964) to characterize the
‘Emydinae’ and later used by Gaffney and Meylan
(1988) as a synapomorphy to unite the same grouping.
As it was originally worded, this character is difficult to
observe in its literal sense for most museum specimens,
because the Meckel’s cartilage usually is not present in
modern and fossil skeletal specimens. We suggest that
the spirit of McDowell’s (1964) character can be evalu-
ated by examining the participation of the angular in the
sulcus cartilaginis Meckelii. We confirm that a small to
broad angular contribution is present in all ‘emydids’
with the exception of rubriventris. In most ‘batagurids,’
the angular is a short bone that does not participate in the
sulcus and barely spans half the distance the prearticular
does. However, a small but clear contribution to the sul-
cus is present in an eclectic group comprised of baska ,
dentata, thurjii , punctularia, and some grandis. We were
not able to carefully evaluate potential polymorphisms
in these taxa.
Polarity: An angular contribution to the sulcus car-
tilaginis Meckelii is present in all cryptodiran outgroup
taxa. We consider is absence to be derived.
(25) Contact between surangular and dentary; 0 =sim-
ple contact, Fig. 49; 1 = strongly interdigitated suture,
Fig. 50 (Crumly, 1982, 12; Crumly, 1985; Gaffney and
Meylan, 1988, H6.1).
In most testudinoids, the surangular and dentary
meet along the lateral side of the mandible in a simple,
overlapping contact. According to Crumly (1982, 1985),
this contact is stabilized through a finger-like process of
the surangular that interdigitates with the dentary in all
tortoises except emys , impressa, and those species he
classified in Gopherus. We confirm the absence of this
character in agassizii, berlandieri, emys, impressa, and
polyphemus, but also did not observe it in areolatus.
Polarity: An interdigitated contact between the
surangular and dentary is absent in all outgroups and the
majority of the ingroup. We consider its presence to be
derived.
(26) Height of the processus coronoideus; 0 = as high as
dentary, Fig. 51; 1 = rising significantly above the den-
tary, Fig. 52 (modified from Hirayama, 1985, 45).
The coronoid of most turtles is a small bone that
produces a minor knobby projection that rises only little
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 63
above the adjacent dentary, if at all. According to
McDowell (1964) and Hirayama (1985) the coronoid is
larger and rises moderately above the dentary in
borneensis and crassicollis, and in reeves ii and subtriju-
ga the coronoid is very large and produces a robust
process that sits high above the dentary. We confirm
these observations, however, we were also able to
observe moderately developed coronoid processes in
kachuga and tentoria. Among ‘emydids,’ we also
observed moderately developed coronoids in barbouri,
ernsti, jlavimaculata, geographica , gibbonsi, kohnii ,
and terrapin. Unlike Hirayama (1985), we only utilize
one derived character state, because it is difficult to
objectively measure and discretize the relative height of
the coronoid among turtles.
Polarity: The coronoids of caretta, serpentina , and
odoratus are small and do not rise above the dentary, but
the coronoid of spinifera is well developed and forms a
moderate process. The lower jaw is not described for
Mongolemys. We consider well-developed coronoids to
be derived within testudinoids.
(27) Foramen dentofaciale majus; 0 = small, Fig. 53; 1
= large and situated within a large lateral fossa, Fig. 54
(Hirayama, 1985, 47).
The foramen dentofaciale majus of most testudi-
noids is a small opening that is situated on the lateral
side of the mandible, just ventral and slightly anterior to
the coronoid. The foramen dentofaciale majus is greatly
enlarged in thurjii and ocellata and is situated at the
anterior end of an expanded lateral fossa (Hirayama.
1985). We confirm the enlargement in those taxa, and
further note its presence in petersi.
Polarity: The foramen dentofaciale majus is small in
all outgroups and the vast majority of the ingroup. Its
presence is considered to be derived.
Triturating Surfaces
(28) Participation of palatine in the triturating surface
of the upper jaw; 0 = absent, Fig. 55; 1 = present, Figs.
56, 57 (Hirayama, 1985, 26; Gaffney and Meylan, 1988,
F2. 1).
In some testudinoids, the palatine has a ventrolater-
al maxillary process that participates in the triturating
surface of the upper jaw. The degree of participation
varies among taxa, and within some species. A clear and
extensive participation is present in barbouri , ernsti ,
geographica , gibbonsi , petersi , rubriventris, script a,
terrapin, texana , and versa. It is weakly developed in
hamiltonii, ocellata, G. oculifera, ouachitensis, reevesii,
subtrijuga, and some individuals of baska.
Participation was used by Gaffney and Meylan
(1988) to unite Terrapene spp., blandingii , guttata, G.
insculpta, marmorata, muhlenbergii, and orbicularis as
a clade within the ‘Emydidae.’ In our observations, how-
ever, this participation also is absent among other ‘ emy-
dids ’ such as jlavimaculata, kohnii, nigrinoda, picta, and
reticularia (we were not able to evaluate adequately the
potential for polymorphism in these taxa). In addition, it
appears that the absence of a palatine participation rep-
resents the plesiomorphic state for testudinoids, thus
eliminating its value for diagnosing monophyletic
groups.
Polarity: The palatine does not participate in the trit-
urating surface of spinifera, but does so in odoratus,
caretta, and serpentina. The palatine does not participate
in the triturating surface of Mongolemys and only occurs
in Testudinoids with highly derived secondary palates.
We consequently consider the participation of the pala-
tine in the triturating surface to be derived within tes-
tudinoids.
(29) Participation of the vomer in the triturating surface
of the upper jaw; 0 = absent, Figs. 56, 57, 58; 1 - pres-
ent, Fig. 59 (Hiray>ama, 1985, 25).
The triturating surface is the grinding surface of the
jaw. In most turtles, it is formed on the upper jaw pre-
dominantly by the maxilla and premaxilla. However, in
turtles with extensive secondary palates the vomer may
also participate. In texana, the vomer may have a ventral
projection that barely separates the maxillae in the mid-
line, but it does not participate in the triturating surface
proper because it sits in a dorsal concavity within the
palate (Fig. 56). Our scorings differ from those of
Hirayama (1985) for mouhotii (which Hirayama scored
as “intermediate apomorphic” and we score as absent
because it does not have a secondary palate) and subtri-
juga (in our specimens the vomer does not descend to
the palatal surface, but this species may be polymor-
phic). This character is polymorphic in barbouri.
Polarity: Because the vomer does not participate in
the triturating surface of odoratus, spinifera, caretta,
serpentina, and Mongolemys, its participation is consid-
ered to be the derived condition for Testudinoidea.
(30) Presence and number of lingual ridges of the tritu-
rating surfaces of the upper and lower jaws; 0 = no lin-
gual ridges present, Fig. 60; 1 = one lingual ridge pres-
ent, Figs. 61-62; 2 = two lingual ridges present (modi-
fied from Hirayama, 1985, 29, 44; Gaffney and Mey4 an,
1988, F7.2, F9.1)
Most turtles lack lingual ridges on their triturating
surfaces (Fig. 60), but one or two such ridges are devel-
oped in a number of testudinoids (Figs. 61-62). These
ridges run parallel to the labial surface of the maxilla
and dentary, and typically do not meet their counterpart
on the midline. They are not necessarily a continuous
structure (Fig. 61), and may be divided into several com-
Vol. 10, p. 64
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
ponents. In some cases, an extensive ridge-like structure
can create the appearance of an additional ridge at the
extreme lingual margin of the maxilla bordering the
internal nares; however, we consider these to be the
thickened rim ot the internal nares rather than an addi-
tional ridge. Among ‘batagurids’ and ‘emydids,’ one lin-
gual ridge is present in alabamensis , borneoensis , deco-
rata, kachuga , P. nelsoni, ocellata, petersi, rnbriventris,
scripta, sinensis, tentoria, texana, and thnrjii. Two lin-
gual ridges are developed in baska. We found lingual
ridges in all tortoises we examined except erosa, bel-
liana , and homeana.
Hirayama (1985) originally scored this character as
two separate characters, one for the mandible and one
for the maxilla. In our observations, the triturating sur-
face of the lower jaw closely mimics that of the upper
jaw, creating an occlusal surface that closely reproduces
the function of cusps in mammalian cheek teeth. Both
characters were scored in parallel in Hirayama’s matrix,
and we see no reason to consider them independent.
Polarity: All outgroups lack lingual ridges on the
triturating surfaces. We consequently consider their
presence to be derived.
(31) Well- dev el oped serrations on labial or lingual
ridges of the triturating surfaces of the upper and lower
jaws; 0 = absent, Fig. 60; 1 = present, Fig. 61 (modified
from Hirayama, 1985, 21, 27, 41, 43, 46; Gaffney and
Meylan, 1988, F9.2; Yasukawa et al., 2001, 11).
Well-developed serrations on the lingual and labial
ridges of the upper and lower jaws are developed in sev-
eral ‘batagurids’ and ‘emydids’. A number of tortoises
and other ‘batagurids’ (e.g., carbonaria, pardalis, sulca-
ta, annulata, and areolata) exhibit serrations on their
ramphothecae, but unlike the bony, tooth-like serrations
of borneoensis, thurjii, petersi, or texana, these crenula-
tions are weakly developed, leaving very little or no
trace of serrations on the underlying bone. In compari-
son to those taxa with well-developed serrations, it very
difficult to establish a consistent scoring system for taxa
with fine crenulations, because many specimens will not
exhibit any serrations, probably due to wear of the ram-
phothecae. Unlike Hirayama (1985) and Yasukawa et al.
(2001) we scored all taxa with such weak serrations as
absent.
Unfortunately, even in those taxa with well-devel-
oped serrations, the serrations are not always evenly
developed on all ridges. We consequently combined all
of Hirayama’s (1985) characters relating to serrations
into one character. Because serrations commonly occur
on all available ridges, this treatment will also help to
avoid unconsciously weighting the presence of serra-
tions with up to five characters. In those taxa that have
them, the ridges themselves often have very different
morphologies; this character needs to be critically
reevaluated with adequate sample sizes for the relevant
taxa.
Polarity: All of our outgroup taxa and the majority
of the ingroup taxa lack strong serrations. We interpret
their presence to be derived.
(32) Median ridge or sulcus of the triturating surface of
the upper jaw; 0 = both structures absent, Fig. 60; l =
median ridge present, Fig. 62; 2 = median sulcus pres-
ent, Fig. 63 (modified from Hirayama, 1985, 30;
Crumly, 1985, 1994, 4; Gaffney and Meylan, 1988,
H3.1).
In a number of testudinoid turtles with partially
developed secondary palates and lingual ridges, addi-
tional structures are formed along the midline of the
upper jaw that typically correspond to reciprocal struc-
tures of the lower jaw. The upper jaw of petersi is char-
acterized by a narrow sulcus (Fig. 63) and the mandible
exhibits a low median ridge. On the other hand, in
baska, borneoensis, thurjii, kachuga, agassizii,
berlandieri, and polyphemus, a ridge runs along the mid-
line (Fig. 62), which typically corresponds to a sulcus in
the lower jaw. An incipient ridge also was reported in
emys (Crumly, 1994), but we were not able to confirm
this on the specimen available to us.
Polarity: A median ridge is absent in all outgroups
and the vast majority of the ingroup. Its presence is con-
sidered to be derived.
(33) Posterior extension of the lower triturating surface
behind the symphysis of the dentary; 0 = absent, Fig.
64; 1 = present, Fig. 65 (Hirayama, 1985, 42; Gaffney
and Meylan, 1988, G5.2).
In several ‘batagurids,’ the triturating surface of the
dentary forms a shelf along the midline that extends so
far posteriorly that the symphysis cannot be seen when
the mandible is observed in dorsal view (McDowell,
1964). Our scorings fully agree with those of Hirayama
(1985) for the ‘Bataguridae,’ but we disagree with
Gaffney and Meylan (1988) who asserted that this char-
acter also occurs in some ‘Emydidae.’ Admittedly, sev-
eral species currently placed in the genera Graptemys,
Pseudemys, and Trachemys have greatly expanded tritu-
rating surfaces of the dentary, but in all of the specimens
available to us, the symphysis is always visible in dorsal
view.
Polarity: An extended triturating surface of the den-
tary does not occur in any outgroup taxon. We consider
its presence to be derived.
Carapace
(34) Carapace strongly tricarinate in adult; 0 = absent,
Figs. 66, 67; 1 = present, Fig. 68 (modified from
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 65
Hirayama, 1985, F; McCord et al., 1995, 10; Yasukawa
et al., 2001, 24).
Three distinct carapacial ridges are present in the
adults of reevesii, hamiltonii, spengleri , subtrijuga, tri-
juga, and mouhotii. We cannot replicate Hirayama’s
(1985) placement of this character as an autapomorphy
in hamiltonii. In our observations, the carinae in hamil-
tonii are not better developed than in some other taxa. In
fact, they are more weakly developed than those in
mouhotii (Fig. 68). Because keels are present in the
young and subadults of such taxa as crassicollis (Fig.
67), mutica, and sinensis, but disappear with age, and
because we were not able to observe the juveniles of
most species, we restricted this character to those
species that exhibit well-developed tricarinae as adults.
Three keels were reported to be present in the adults of
dentata (McCord et al., 1995), but we cannot confirm
this (tricarinae are not present on our younger speci-
mens).
Polarity: Tricarinae are absent in our outgroup
species ( caretta , odoratus, serpentina , spinifera, gibba,
siebenrocki, subglobosa, and subrufa), but do appear
occasionally in some of their close relatives, such as
scorpioides, temminckii, and fimbriatus. We consider the
presence of tricarinae to be derived within
Testudinoidea.
(35) Significant serration of the posterior peripherals; 0
= absent, Fig. 66; 1 = present, Fig. 68 (modified from
Hirayama, 1985, D; McCord et al., 1995, 11; Yasukawa
et al., 2001, 23).
We generally agree with previous observations
reported for this character (Hirayama, 1985). However,
because the carapace rim is at least slightly serrated in
almost all turtles, we rephrase the character definition to
include only significantly serrated posterior peripherals
as found, for example, in crassicollis, dentata, grandis,
mouhotii, N. platynota, and spengleri. Among the ‘emy-
dids’ and ‘testudinids,’ the peripherals of barbouri,
erosa, fiavimaculata, geographica, homeana, kohnii,
nigrinoda, oculifer, G. oculifera, pseudogeographica,
and versa also are serrated. It is important to note that
our scores are based on the peripheral bones; the amount
of carapacial serration greatly depends on the presence
or absence of the marginal scutes in the specimens used,
because the scutes greatly accentuate the amount of ser-
ration, if present. We find no conflict with the codings of
McCord et al. (1995) and Yasukawa et al. (2001).
Polarity: Serrated posterior peripherals are present
in caretta, but absent in odoratus, serpentina , and most
pleurodires. However, due to ingroup commonality and
its absence in taxa placed within “Lindholmemydidae”
we conclude that its presence is derived.
(36) Carapace of adult tectiform in cross-section with a
strong posterior projection on the third vertebral scute;
0 = absent, Fig. 69; 1 = present, Fig. 70 (Hirayama,
1985, N).
According to Hirayama (1985), this character only
occurs in tecta and tentoria. For our sample, we were
able to confirm its presence in tecta and tentoria and
also observed it in barbouri ( barbouri and other species
now classified in Graptemys may be sexually dimorphic
for this character). The descriptive term ‘tectiform’ is
somewhat problematic, because any turtle shell can be
considered ‘roofed’ (Fig. 69). We regard a carapace as
tectiform if its sides are more-or-less flat and meet along
the midline at a rather sharp angle (Fig. 70). Many tes-
tudinoids, and notably those ‘emydids’ currently classi-
fied within Graptemys, have a somewhat tectiform cara-
pace as juveniles, but that morphology typically is lost in
the adults.
Polarity: Because all outgroups and the majority of
the ingroup do not have a tectiform carapace, we consid-
er its presence to be derived.
(37) Shape and orientation of the second neural; 0 =
second neural hexagonal, short sides positioned anteri-
orly, Fig. 71; 1 = second neural hexagonal, short sides
positioned posteriorly, Fig. 72; 2 = second neural
octagonal, Fig. 73 (modified from Hirayama, 1985, G;
Yasukawa et al., 2001, 25).
(38) Shape and orientation of the third neural; 0 = third
neural hexagonal, short sides positioned anteriorly, Fig.
71; 1 = third neural hexagonal, short sides positioned
posteriorly, Fig. 72; 2 = third neural square, Fig. 74; 3
= third neural octagonal, Fig. 75 (modified from
Hirayama, 1985, G; Yasukawa et al, 2001, 25).
Originally, Hirayama (1985) only discussed the ori-
entation of the neurals in general, which is fully suffi-
cient for his ‘batagurid’ ingroup, because almost all indi-
viduals exhibit his two suggested character states.
However, in most tortoises the second and/or third neu-
rals are not hexagonal, but rather are square or octago-
nal, making it impossible to assign them to one of
Hirayama’s (1985) character states. We consequently
split Hirayama’s original character into two characters,
restricted their application to the second and third neu-
ral, and added additional character states.
Our observations generally agree with those of
Hirayama (1985) and Yasukawa et al. (2001) for
‘batagurids,’ with the exception of annandalei in which
we found the short side of the second and third neurals
to be positioned anteriorly, and not posteriorly as was
indicated by Hirayama (1985).
Polarity: The short side of the second and third neu-
ral bones faces posteriorly in odoratus and spinifera but
Vol. 10, p. 66
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
anteriorly in caretta. The shape of the second and third
neurals is extremely variable in serpentina. However, in
Lindholmemys and Mongolemys the short side of the
second and third neurals is positioned anteriorly. We
consider that condition to be primitive for
Testudinoidea.
(39) Medial contact of the seventh and/or eighth costal
bones; 0 = absent, Fig. 76; 1 = present, Fig. 77
(Hirayama, 1985, V; Yasukawa et al., 2001, 26).
In some testudinoid turtles, the posterior costal
bones meet along the midline due to the reduction of the
posterior neural elements. The original character defini-
tion provided by Hirayama (1985) and Yasukawa et al.
(2001) was worded to indicate a contact between the
seventh and eighth costal bones among some
’batagurids.’ We are unable to reproduce their results if
the character definition is taken literally. For example, in
all our specimens of amboinensis and galbinifrons, the
eighth costals meet on the midline, but the seventh
costals do not. However, if the character definition is
modified to include any contact of the seventh or eighth
costals, our results are concordant with those of
Hirayama (1985) and Yasukawa et al. (2001). In addition
to the Asian box turtles, we report a medial contact of
the posterior costals in baska, Carolina, coahuila, T. nel-
soni, T. ornata and rnbida.
Polarity: A medial contact of the seventh and/or
eighth costals is absent in serpentina, but present in
spinifera, caretta, many kinostemids, and many pleu-
rodires. Although a composite reconstruction of a puta-
tive “lindholmemydid” from the Early Cretaceous of
Japan was illustrated with the seventh costals in contact
at the midline (Hirayama et al., 2000, fig. 11), such a
contact is absent in other specimens of Lindholmemys
and Mongolemys. Its presence within testudinoids is pre-
dominantly in the highly derived box turtles, and we
conclude that its presence is derived for Testudinoidea.
(40) Cervical scute; 0 = present, Fig. 78; 1 = absent,
Fig. 79 (modified from Crumly, 1985, 1994, 34; Gaffney
and Meylan, 1988, H5.2, FI 10.1; Shaffer et al., 1997,
41).
The presence and shape of the cervical scute is used
commonly to determine phylogenetic relationships
within tortoises. According to Crumly (1985) the cervi-
cal scute is very narrow or absent in all tortoises except
agassizii, berlandieri, emys, flavomarginatus, impressa,
and polyphemus. We generally agree with these observa-
tions, but when this character is applied to all testudi-
noids intraspecific variation is so great that the character
becomes essentially useless. We consequently limit our
scoring to the mere presence or absence of the cervical
scute. We confirm the observations of Gaffney and
Meylan (1988) that this scute is absent in carbonaria,
chilensis, elegans, nigra, par dalis, and sulcata and addi-
tionally code homeana and erosa as polymorphic.
Polarity: The cervical scute is present in all cryp-
todiran outgroups that have scutes on their carapace. We
consider its absence to be derived.
(41) Number of vertebral scutes; 0 = five, Fig. 80; 1 =
six or more, Fig. 81 (Hirayama, 1985, P).
We confirm Hirayama’s (1985) observation that
there are at least six vertebral scutes in N. platynota.
Additional scutes occasionally occur in other species,
but are best considered abnormalities; they typically
lack the symmetrical associations with adjacent pleural
scutes seen in N. platynota.
Polarity: All testudinoids, except for N. platynota,
have five vertebral scutes. We consider the presence of
six scutes to be derived.
(42) Position of the anterior sulcus of the fourth verte-
bral scute; 0 = sulcus lies on the fifth neural, Fig. 82; 1
= sulcus lies on fourth neural, or on the suture between
the fourth and fifth neural, Fig. 83; 2 = sulcus lies on the
sixth neural, or on the suture between the fifth and sixth
neural, Fig. 84 (modified from Hirayama, 1985, L+M).
(43) Position of the posterior sulcus of the fourth verte-
bral scute; 0 = sulcus lies on the eighth neural, or on the
homologue of the eighth neural, if the seventh is reduced
(e.g., in most tortoises), Fig. 85; 1 = sulcus lies on the
seventh neural, or on the suture between the seventh and
eight neural, Fig. 86; 2= eighth neural absent, sulcus
overlies costals that meet at the midline, Fig. 87 (modi-
fied from Hirayama, 1985, L+M).
The size of the fourth vertebral scute was addressed
with two characters by Hirayama (1985) but the total
range of morphological variability in testudinoids is not
encompassed by his character definitions. In most tes-
tudinoids, the fourth vertebral scute covers the posterior
half of the fifth neural bone, the sixth and seventh neu-
rals, and the anterior half of the eighth neural. A number
of variations are known, and simply counting the num-
ber of neural bones covered by this scute results in prob-
lems by creating a false perception of homology. For
instance, a fourth scute that partially overlies the fourth
and seventh neurals and fully covers the fifth and sixth,
can strictly be said also to cover four neurals, but the ele-
ments involved are only partially homologous with the
common condition. We attempt to resolve these issues
by establishing two new characters that preserve what
we think was Hirayama’s (1985) original intent, but that
permit a more accurate representation of the association
between the fourth vertebral scute and the underlying
neural bones.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 67
Some problems that are associated with scoring this
character include the prevalence of scute abnormalities
among testudinoids (e.g., Coker, 1905, 1910; Newman,
1906; Zangerl and Johnson, 1957). Specimens exhibit-
ing such abnormalities were scored as unknown. The
notable exception to this is N. platynota, in which a
sixth, or even a seventh, vertebral scute is always pres-
ent.
Polarity: Determining the polarity through outgroup
relationship is somewhat difficult, because almost every
outgroup exhibits a different condition, especially for
the posterior sulcus. Based on ingroup commonality, and
the presence of our zero state in both Lindholmemys and
Mongolemys, we consider the sulci of the fourth verte-
bral scute to be primitively situated on the fifth and
eighth neural bones.
(44) Posterior margin of first vertebral scute significant-
ly narrower than its anterior margin; 0 = absent, Fig.
88; 1 = present, Fig. 89 (modified from Hir ay ama, 1985,
C).
When originally proposed, this character was
applied to a posterior constriction of all vertebral scutes
(Hirayama, 1985). If strictly applied, this character is
absent in all taxa, because the fifth vertebral scute never
is constricted along its posterior edge relative to the
anterior edge. If each scute is viewed by itself, it
becomes apparent that especially the fourth vertebral
scute tends to be narrowed posteriorly, as can be
observed in all species now classified in the genera
Graptemys, Heosemys, Trachemys, and Testudo among
others. According to Hirayama (1985), posterior narrow-
ing is limited to crassicollis and borneensis and unites
them as a synapomorphy. We were able to replicate this
distribution only if the character definition was restrict-
ed to the first vertebral scute, in which the posterior mar-
gin is significantly narrower than its anterior margin in
those two species only. In making this change, however,
this character becomes at least partly redundant with
characters 45 and 47.
Polarity: Outgroup analysis reveals that posterior
narrowing of the first vertebral scute is present only in
odoratus\ it is absent in Lindholmemys and
Mongolemys. We regard the presence of a posterior nar-
rowing of the first vertebral scute to be derived.
(45) Anterior half of the first vertebral scute much nar-
rower than posterior half especially in adults; 0
absent, Fig. 90; 1 = present, Fig. 91 (modified from
Hirayama, 1985, R).
We confirm the clear presence of an anteriorly nar-
rowed first vertebral scute in dentata and spinosa as
reported by Hirayama (1985), and note that grandis is
polymorphic. Because the anterior sulcus of the first ver-
tebral scute commonly is restricted to the nuchal bone in
several other taxa, but the scute shows no anterior nar-
rowing, we limit the original character definition to the
shape of the first vertebral scute only. This peculiar mor-
phology seems to be the result of growth that is limited
to the anterior edge and the posterior half of the lateral
edge of the first vertebral scute. As a consequence, this
character is not apparent in juveniles, but becomes
increasingly accentuated in adults.
Polarity: Anterior narrowing of the first vertebral
scute is absent in all outgroups and within the large
majority of the ingroup. We consider its presence to be
derived.
(46) Significant contact of the tenth marginal scute with
the fifth vertebral scute; 0 = absent, Fig. 92; 1 = pres-
ent, Fig. 93 (modified from Hirayama, 1985, K).
Contact of the tenth marginal scute with the fifth
vertebral scute was reported previously only in baska,
smithii, tecta, and tentoria (Hirayama, 1985). We are
able to confirm the presence of a very well developed
contact in all but smithii (not seen), and we add spinosa
to the list of species in which this contact may occur (it
is polymorphic for spinosa ; contact is present in CAS
228368, but absent in the smaller CAS 228459, so onto-
genetic differences may explain the polymorphism). We
also note slight contacts in some specimens of other
species (e.g., agassizii, borneoensis, carbonaria, home-
ana, orbicularis, pardalis, and polyphemus ), but by
rewording Hirayama’s (1985) original character to
include only significant contact, we are able to retain
what we believe was his original intent.
Polarity: Due to the absence of contact in all out-
groups in which it is applicable and the predominance
within the ingroup, we consider its presence to be
derived.
(47) Contact of the second marginal scute with the first
vertebral scute; 0 = absent, Fig. 94; 1 = present, Fig. 95
(Hirayama, 1985, O; see also Tinkle, 1962, table 1,
‘Seam A ’).
According to Hirayama (1985), the first vertebral
scute usually (>90%) contacts the second marginal scute
in japonica, leprosa, and caspica. He also noted that the
scutes are sometimes in contact in N. platynota and
bealei. For our sample, we are able to confirm this con-
tact as a polymorphism for bealei , caspica , japonica ,
and leprosa , but the contact is clearly absent in all our
specimens of N. platynota. We also note that these scutes
are sometimes in contact in picta, amboinensis, orbicu-
laris, and terrapin. Together with all of the above, these
taxa were scored as polymorphic. The only taxa to
exhibit a consistently well-developed contact are reticu-
laria and blandingii.
Vol. 10, p. 68
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Polarity: A clear contact between the second mar-
ginal scute and the first vertebral scute does not exist in
caretta or serpentina , but both morphologies occur in
kinostemids and pleurodires. The scutes are not in con-
tact in Lindholmemys and Gravemys , but they are in con-
tact in Mongolemys. The polarity for this character is
ambiguous.
(48) Contact of the sixth marginal scute with the third
pleural scute; 0 = absent, Fig. 96; 1 = present, Fig. 97
(modified from Hirayama, 1985, B; see also Tinkle,
1962, table 3, ‘Seam C’).
The contact between the sixth marginal and third
pleural scutes is easily enough rendered as a simple
"presence or absence’ character, but this hides the range
of possible morphological variation. The degree of con-
tact can range from extensive to a condition where the
two scutes just barely contact at their comers. Several
taxa exhibit a condition where these scutes either barely
touch or do not touch one another at their comers, but
whenever several specimens were available to us, they
typically turned out to be polymorphic. For this reason
Gaffney and Meylan (1988) called this character ‘dubi-
ous.’ We scored such borderline cases as polymorphic,
even if not enough specimens were available to corrob-
orate this.
We confirm Hirayama’s (1985) observations
regarding the absence of a contact between these scutes
in baska, ocellata, tecta, tentoria, and thurjii, and we
add petersi and spinosa to that list. Taxa that we score as
polymorphic include annandalei, borneensis, borneoen-
sis, caspica, crassicollis, grandis, hamiltonii, japonica,
punctularia , reevesii, sinensis, subtrijuga, and trijuga.
Whereas all ‘emydids’ lack a contact, tortoises exhibit
both character states.
The presence of a contact between the sixth margin-
al scute and the third pleural scute was considered by
Hirayama (1985) to unite crown group ‘batagurids’ and
‘testudinids’ as a synapomorphy. Given the patchy dis-
tribution of this character, and widespread polymor-
phism, it seems to be of little use.
Polarity: A contact between the sixth marginal scute
and the third pleural scute is absent in most outgroups.
The exception is caretta ; this is not surprising because
caretta has five instead of four pleural scutes. We con-
sider the presence of a contact to be derived.
(49) Twelfth marginal scute; 0 = two present, their com-
mon sulcus only partially subdivides the pygal bone,
Fig. 98; 1 = two present, but their common sulcus fully
subdivides the pygal bone, Fig. 98; 2 = both twelfth
marginal scutes fused along the midline, Fig. 99 (modi-
fied from Mlynarski, 1976; Crumly, 1985, 1994, 35;
Gaffney and Meylan, 1988, H2.1).
According to McDowell (1964, p. 240 and table 1
number 4) members of the ‘Emydinae’ can be distin-
guished from the ‘Batagurinae’ based on an incomplete
subdivision of the pygal bone by the median sulcus of
the posterior-most marginals. We found exceptions with
picta, N. platynota, pulcherrima, reevesii, ret icul aria,
and spengleri, which do not always clearly exhibit the
pattern that would be predicted by McDowell’s (1964)
statement, but we note that the expression of this charac-
ter will depend significantly on the shape of the pygal
bone. In all tortoises except emys and impressa, the
twelfth marginal scutes are fused to from a single supra-
caudal scute that covers the posterior part of the cara-
pace (Crumly, 1985). For this condition, we created a
third character state.
Polarity: The twelfth marginal scutes are fully sep-
arated in all outgroups that have them, and their com-
mon sulcus fully subdivides the pygal bone. The pygal
bone in “lindholmemydids” is polymorphic, with the 0
state found in Lindholmemys and Mongolemys, and the
1 state in Gravemys. Either state 0 or state 1 is primitive
for Testudinoidea; the midline fusion of the twelfth mar-
ginals is a derived feature for ‘Testudinidae’.
Bridge
(50) Sutured contact between plastron and carapace; 0
= present, plastron and carapace are tightly connected
by an osseous bridge, Fig. 100; 1 = absent, plastron is
attached to carapace by connective tissue, Fig. 101
(modified from Hirayama, 1985, Q; Shaffer et al., 1997,
58; Yasukawa et al. 2001, 21a).
(51) Presence and development of anterior buttresses; 0
= anterior buttresses absent, Fig. 102; 1 = anterior but-
tresses present but small, and not in contact with the first
costal bones, Fig. 103; 2 = anterior buttresses long and
thin and just barely in contact with the costal bones, if at
all, Fig. 104; 3 = anterior buttresses well developed and
in clear contact with the first costal bones, Fig. 105; 4 =
anterior buttresses very large and in direct contact with
the first dorsal rib, Fig. 106 (modified from Hirayama,
1985, Q; Gaffney and Meylan, 1988, A 14.2; Yasukawa
et al, 2001, 28).
(52) Presence and development of posterior buttresses;
0 = posterior buttresses absent, Fig. 107; 1 = posterior
buttresses present but small, and not in contact with the
costal bones, Fig. 108; 2 = posterior buttresses long and
thin and just barely in contact with the costal bones, if at
all, Fig. 109; 3 = posterior buttresses well developed
and in clear contact with costal bones V and VI, Fig.
110; 4 = posterior buttresses well developed but onlv in
clear contact with costal bone V, Fig. Ill (modified from
Hirayama, 1985, Q; Gaffney and Meylan, 1988, A 14.2,
Shaffer et al, 1997, 55; Yasukawa et al, 2001, 29).
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 69
(5j) Medially-directed pivoting process for plastral
hinge developed on fifth peripheral bone; 0 = absent,
Fig. 112; 1 = present, Fig. 113.
(54) Complete or almost complete overlap of hyoplas-
tron/hypoplastron suture by the pectoral/ abdominal sul-
cus; 0 = absent, Fig. 114; 1 = present, Fig. 115 (modi-
fied Gaffney and Meylan, 1988, F3.2; Burke et al., 1996,
16; McCord et al., 1995, 13; Yasukawa et al., 2001,
21b).
In most testudinoid turtles, the plastron is attached
to the carapace via a fully ossified bridge and variably
developed plastral buttresses. In species with a kinetic
plastron, the bridge is typically absent and the plastron is
attached to the carapace via connective tissues (e.g.,
amboinensis, blandingii , Carolina , dentata, galbinifrons,
mouhotii , orbicularis , T. ornata). The original configu-
ration of this character tied the presence of plastral kine-
sis to the reduction of the buttresses (Hirayama, 1985).
However, within testudinoid turtles the morphology of
the buttresses varies significantly and independently
from plastral kinesis. We consequently split this charac-
ter into three discrete characters concerned with the
morphology of the bridge and the buttresses.
We also developed two new characters that pertain
to the morphology of the bridge region: the presence of
medially-directed processes on the fifth peripherals that
act as pivots for the plastral bones during shell closure
(Bramble, 1974) and a revised plastral kinesis character
(Gaffney and Meylan, 1988; McCord et al., 1995) that
considers plastral-kinesis to be well developed only in
those taxa in which the pectoral/abdominal sulcus fully
overlaps the hyoplastron/hypoplastron suture, allowing
optimal movement between the two plastral lobes. Most
taxa with plastral kinesis also have well-developed piv-
oting processes on the fifth peripherals, but notable
exceptions are orbicularis and N. platynota. In
blandingii , the process is modified into an anteroposte-
riorly-elongated, flattened process that extends along
most or all of the length of the fifth peripheral (Fig. 113).
In some specimens of blandingii , a similar structure is
developed on the sixth peripheral as well.
Polarity: Reconstructing the basal condition for
these characters within testudinoids is difficult, because
all living cryptodiran outgroups do not have plastral but-
tresses and commonly lack osseous bridges. However,
the bridge of Gravemys, Mongolemys, and
Lindholmemys is osseous, shows no signs of kinesis, and
(at least in Lindholmemys) the anterior and posterior but-
tresses are well developed and touch the costal bones.
We consider that morphology to be primitive for
Testudinoids.
(55) Contact between inguinal and femoral scutes; 0 =
absent, Fig. 116; 1 = present, Fig. 117 (Crumly, 1985,
1994, 42; Gaffney and Meylan, 1988, H3.3, HI 5.2).
Within tortoises the complete or frequent absence of
a contact between the inguinal scute and the femoral
scute was used previously to hypothesize the monophy-
ly of several smaller clades, for example {graeca + her-
manni + horsfieldi + kleinmanni + marginata + tornieri }
(Crumly, 1985) and {agassizii + berlandieri + flavomar-
ginatus + polyphemus } (Gaffney and Meylan 1988). We
confirm the absence of a contact in representatives of the
first group, but not in the second. Among the second
group (traditionally classified together in Gopherus) the
contact is strongly reduced, but still is present. Among
‘batagurids’ and ‘emydids,’ a contact is absent in all taxa
with the noteworthy exception of hamiltonii.
Polarity: Determining the polarity for this character
is somewhat difficult because all living outgroups have
an arrangement of plastral scutes that is rather different
from testudinoids. However, based on ingroup common-
ality and the absence of a contact in the
“Lindholmemydidae,” we conclude that the presence of
a contact between the inguinal and femoral scutes
should be considered derived for Testudinoidea.
(56) Presence of musk glands; 0 = inguinal and axillary
gland present; 1 = axillary gland present only; 2 = musk
glands absent (modified from Crumly, 1985).
(57) Presence of anterior musk duct foramina; 0 = musk
glands and their foramina present, Fig. 118; 1 = musk
glands present, but foramina not developed; 2 = musk
glands and foramina absent (modified from Hirayama,
1985, A; Gaffney and Meylan, 1988, FI. 2, F5.3; Burke
et al., 1996, 20).
(58) Presence of posterior musk duct foramina; 0 =
musk glands and their foramina present, Fig. 119 ; 1 =
musk glands present, but foramina not developed; 2 =
musk glands and foramina absent (modified from
Hirayama, 1985, A; Gaffney and Meylan, 1988, FI. 2,
F5.3; Burke et al., 1996, 20).
According to Hirayama (1985), the presence of
musk duct foramina characterizes the paraphyletic
assemblage ‘Batagurinae’ (sensu Hirayama, 1985, not
Gaffney and Meylan, 1988). We believe the difference
of opinion between Hirayama (1985) and Gaffney and
Meylan (1988) regarding this character is based on fail-
ure to make clear the distinction between the presence of
musk glands and the presence of musk duct foramina.
Musk glands are developed in almost all extant turtles
(Waagen, 1972), and we consequently agree with
Gaffney and Meylan (1988) that their presence should
be considered primitive for all cryptodiran turtles.
Vol. 10, p. 70
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
However, even though most turtles have musk glands,
true musk duct foramina are developed only in some
pleurodires (e.g., Chelodina, Emydura), some ‘emy-
dids,’ and all “batagurids,’ making a monophyletic
Testudinoidea (sensu Hirayama, 1985) possible. Distinct
musk duct grooves are present on the anterior peripher-
als of Kinostemidae, and tiny foramina are sometimes
associated with these (Hutchison, 1991).
Because the presence of musk glands does not nec-
essarily result in the development of musk duct forami-
na, we decided to score these two characters separately.
We relied on an unpublished thesis on the musk glands
of turtles (Waagen, 1972) to determine the presence of
musk glands for most taxa. In scoring taxa not investi-
gated by Waagen (1972) we only recorded presence of
musk glands if musk duct foramina provided positive
evidence for their presence (e.g., baska, bealei, borneen-
sis, galbinifrons , kachuga, mouhotii , petersi, pulcherri-
ma, spengleri, and tentoria). Many tortoises, conse-
quently, had to be scored as unknown, because they
were not analyzed by Waagen (1972) and do not exhibit
musk duct foramina (e.g., elongata, homeana, horsfiel-
di, and pardalis ).
Our scoring of the musk duct foramina is derived
from a combination of osteological observation and data
provided by Waagen (1972). Taxa not reported to pos-
sess musk glands (Waagen, 1972) were checked for
musk duct foramina, but none were found. For those
species that Waagen reported as having musk glands, we
sought musk duct foramina on osteological specimens.
Several taxa with musk glands, but only lightly ossified
bridges, do not exhibit musk duct foramina (e.g.,
blandingii, dentata , flavomarginata, orbicularis , and
pulcherrima) or show an asymmetry with foramina only
visible anteriorly (e.g., N. platynota). In taxa that pos-
sess them, the musk duct foramina are sometimes con-
tained entirely within the peripherals (e.g., N. platyno-
ta), and sometimes between the peripheral and the plas-
tral buttress (e.g., reevesii).
Polarity: Given the presence of musk glands in all
extant outgroups (Waagen, 1972), their absence should
be considered derived. Musk duct foramina are not
described for “lindholmemydids” but J. H. Hutchison
specifically searched for them in Mongolemys speci-
mens housed at IVPP and found no trace of them.
Because musk duct foramina are developed in the vast
majority of the ingroup, we consider their absence to be
derived for testudinoids.
Plastron
(59) Extensive overhanging lip of the epiplastra; 0 =
absent, Fig. 120; 1 = present, Fig. 121 (Gaffney and
Meylan 1988, H5.1, 9.2).
In most testudinoid turtles, the epiplastra are rather
flat with a slight increase in thickness along the anterior
margin. In contrast, many tortoises have strongly thick-
ened epiplastral margins that sometimes form an over-
hanging lip along the interior rim of the plastron.
According to Gaffney and Meylan (1988) the presence
of such an overhang of the epiplastra unites all tortoises
except those classified in the genera Manouria (Fig.
120) and Gopherus, with a reversal occurring in giant
insular forms. We confirm this general pattern, but we
note the absence of an overhang in tornieri. A interior
overhang is absent also in all extant ‘emydids’ and
‘batagurids,’ but a small overhang is present in extinct
Ptychogaster and Echmatemys (Mlynarski, 1976, figs.
78, 8 1), taxa generally considered to belong to either the
‘Emydidae’ or ‘Batagurinae.’
Polarity: An overhanging lip on the epiplastra is
absent in all outgroups and the majority of the ingroup.
We consider its presence to be derived.
(60) Intersection of the entoplastron by the humeropec-
toral sulcus; 0 = absent, Fig. 122; 1 = present, Fig. 123
(Hirayama, 1985, X; Crumly, 1985; Gaffney and
Meylan, 1988, F5.1; McCord et al., 1995, 15).
This character was used to help resolve relation-
ships within ‘batagurids’ by Hirayama (1985) but we
were unable to replicate his results in our analysis. We
agree with Crumly (1985) that the sulcus crosses the
entoplastron in at least one species classified in the
genus Indotestudo (i.e., elongata ), but the sulcus is at the
entoplastron/hyoplastron suture in our specimen of
forsteni. The condition in species now commonly classi-
fied in Testudo varies widely (e.g., the suture crosses the
entoplastron in graeca and horsfieldi, but does not in
hermanni or kleinmanni). We also agree with Gaffney
and Meylan (1988) on their distribution of this character
among the ‘Emydidae,’ however, our scoring for picta,
orbicularis, and blandingii is polymorphic, because the
sulcus generally runs along the suture between the ento-
plastron and the hypoplastra, but may barely fall on
either side.
Polarity: The polarity is ambiguous if only extant
taxa are considered. The plastron of most outgroups is
too different from that of testudinoids to be of any use
for polarizing this character. For instance, the plastron of
spinifera lacks scutes, and that of serpentina, odoratus,
and caretta is too heavily modified to enable a meaning-
ful comparison. Both character states are commonly
found in ‘batagurids,’ ‘emydids,’ and testudinids, mak-
ing an ingroup analysis futile. The humeropectoral sul-
cus is distinctly posterior to the epiplastron in Gravemys
and Mongolemys, so we consider an intersection of this
suture with the entoplastron to be derived.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 71
(61) Anal notch of the plastron; 0 = present, Fig. 124; 1
= greatly reduced, Fig 125; 2 = absent, Fig. 126 (mod-
ified from Hirayama, 1985, W; Yasukawa et al, 2001,
22).
The plastron of most testudinoid turtles has a signif-
icant anal notch. The absence of such an anal notch for
amboinensis, galbinifrons, and flavomarginata was
reported by Hirayama (1985) and we confirm those
observations. An anal notch also is absent in belliana,
Carolina , coahuila , erosa , homeana, T. nelsoni , and T.
ornata. To accommodate the presence of a reduced anal
notch we modify Hirayama’s (1985) character by creat-
ing a third character state. A reduced anal notch is found
in blandingii, orbicularis, N. platynota, and reticularia.
In at least one species (mouhotii), a distinct anal notch is
present in larger individuals, but small specimens have a
reduced notch (scored as polymorphic in our matrix);
this suggests that development of an anal notch may be
subject to ontogenetic variation in at least some testudi-
noids.
Polarity: In caretta and serpentina an anal notch is
not present, however, their plastra are narrow and
tapered posteriorly. The fleshy plastron of spinifera is
smooth along its posterior margin, but this cannot be
observed in osteological preparations. A notch is weak-
ly developed in at least some Lindholmemys, but is
absent in Mongolemys. A notch is present in kinostem-
ids, pleurodires, most of the ingroup, and in Gravemys.
We conclude that its absence should be considered
derived for our ingroup.
(62) Anal scutes fused; 0 = absent, Fig. 127; 1 = pres-
ent, Fig. 127 (Hirayama, 1985, Z).
The anal scutes of adult galbinifrons, and flavomar-
ginata are at least slightly fused, especially along their
posterior medial border. We fully agree with Hirayama’s
(1985) treatment for this character. Anal scute fusion can
be identified easily in macerated specimens (Fig. 127),
because the anal scutes will not separate from one anoth-
er, as will all other scutes.
Polarity: Anal scute fusion is absent in the vast
majority of turtles, and is considered to be the primitive
condition.
(63) Plastral scutes with vibrant, radiating color pat-
tern; 0 = absent, Fig. 128; 1 = present, Fig. 129
(Hirayama, 1985, S; McCord et al, 1995, 16 Yasukawa
et al, 2001, 32).
Vibrant, radiating color patterns of the plastral
scutes of dentata, grandis, and spinosa were noted by
Hirayama (1985) and McCord et al. (1995). We add
tcheponensis to this list, as well as the testudinids geo-
metricus and P. oculifera. In our specimens, the pattern
of dentata and tcheponensis is not as vibrant as in gran-
dis and spinosa.
Polarity: Vibrant, radiated color patterns are miss-
ing in all outgroups and the majority of the ingroup.
Their presence is derived.
Postcranium and Soft Tissue
(64) Development of a suprascapula; 0 = absent; 1 =
present, Fig. 130 (Gaffney and Meylan, 1988, F3.1;
Burke et al, 1996, 11).
(65) Development of an episcapula; 0 = absent; 1 =
present, Fig. 130 (Gaffney and Meylan, 1988, F4.1;
Burke et al, 1996, 11).
The presence of both a suprascapula and an epis-
capula apparently is limited to blandingii and the species
currently classified in Terrapene. A suprascapula is also
present in orbicularis. Both structures are involved in
the locking mechanism of the anterior plastral lobe dur-
ing shell closure (Bramble, 1974). These structures are
difficult to verify in most osteological preparations,
because they may dissociate from the scapula and be dif-
ficult to recognize, and because they may ossify only in
older individuals. The specimen we dissected to illus-
trate these features (TNHC 62532, a T. ornata with cara-
pace length of 103 mm) has a completely cartilaginous
episcapula, and a predominantly cartilaginous supras-
capula (Fig. 130). It is therefore much easier to confirm
their presence than verify their absence. We followed
Bramble’s (1974) account of these structures and scored
our matrix accordingly, as probably did Gaffney and
Meylan (1988) and Burke et al. (1996).
Polarity: Suprascapulae and episcapulae are absent
in all outgroups and the majority of the ingroup. Their
presence is considered to be derived.
(66) Shape of coracoid blade; 0 = long and narrow, Fig.
131; 1 = short and very wide, Fig. 131 (Crumly, 1985,
1994; Gaffney and Meylan, 1988, HI. 7).
The coracoid blade of all ‘emydids’ and
‘batagurids’ is an elongate bone with a narrow, short
shaft and a long, wedge-shaped coracoid blade that is
about two times wider than the base. In tortoises, this
bone is still wedge-shaped, but relatively much shorter
and with a blade that is considerably wider, typically
four times the width of the base (Crumly, 1985, 1994;
Gaffney and Meylan, 1988). We agree with previously
published observations.
Polarity: The coracoid blade of caretta, serpentina,
and odoratus is long and narrow and that of spinifera is
long, but not wedge-shaped. We consider a long and nar-
row coracoid blade to be primitive for Testudinoidea.
(67) Number of manual claws; 0 = five, Fig. 132; 1 =
four, Fig. 133 (modified from Hirayama, 1985, J).
Vol. 10, p. 72
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Most testudinoid turtles have five manual claws
with the exception of baska and horsfieldi, both of
which have only four. We did not verify this character
independently for all species, due to an overall lack of
articulated skeletons and our limited access to pickled
specimens. However, because the number of claws of
the forelimbs is an easily determinable, discrete number
that is regularly noted and described in the literature, we
scored all remaining taxa from the comprehensive infor-
mation provided by Ernst and Barbour (1989).
Polarity: Five manual claws are present in serpenti-
na, odoratns, and almost all pleurodires (excluding
species currently classified in Chelodina and
Hydromedusa ); three are present in spinifera, and two in
caretta. The condition in “lindholmemydids” is
unknown. Based on ingroup commonality, we consider
five claws to be primitive for the ingroup.
(68) Number of phalanges of manus and pes; 0 = digi-
tal formula of2-3-3-3-3 or 2-3-3-3-2, Fig. 132; 1 = dig-
ital formula with less than 2-3-3-3-2, Fig. 133 (Crumly,
1985; Gaffney and Meylan, 1988, Hl.l).
The digital formula of most testudinoid turtles is 2-
S-3-3-3 or 2-3-3-3-2. Among tortoises, the manus and
pes are greatly shortened and the digital formula is typi-
cally reduced to 2-2-2-2-2 or less (Auffenberg,
1974:135-136; Crumly, 1985). Due to the dissociated
nature of most of the material we viewed, we were not
able to verify the digital formulae of most of the turtle
taxa we included. However, when articulated hands and
feet were present, we never found anything to contradict
the statements made above. We scored all tortoises
based on information provided by Auffenberg (1974)
and Crumly (1985).
Polarity: All outgroups and the majority of the
ingroup do not have a reduced digital formula. We con-
sequently consider the reduced formula to be derived.
(69) Webbing between digits; 0 = present, well devel-
oped, Fig. 134; 1 = absent, or at least strongly reduced,
Fig. 135 (Hirayama, 1985, b).
Due to their semi-aquatic nature, most testudinoids
have well-developed webbing between the digits of their
hands and feet. In more terrestrial species, however, the
webbing often is reduced. Unfortunately, there seems to
be a gradient in the development of webbing, from
extremely well developed (e.g., baska, reticularia) to
moderately developed (e.g., dentata, guttata) to virtual-
ly non-existent (e.g., spengleri ). We nevertheless were
able to reproduce Hirayama’s (1985) distribution for the
‘batagurids’ with the exception of grandis and spinosa,
which have reduced webbing (grandis is the only ‘bor-
derline’ taxon we found, but its webbing is reduced rel-
ative to those taxa we scored as having well-developed
webbing). Among ‘emydids,’ we note that the webbing
is heavily reduced in Carolina, T. nelsoni, and T. ornata.
All tortoises lack webbing.
Polarity: All outgroups and the majority of ingroup
taxa have webbed hands and feet. We consider the
absence of webbing to be derived.
(70) Sexual size dimorphism; 0 = absent; 1 = present,
female much larger than male (Gaffney and Meylan,
1988, F5.2; Burke et al., 1996, 37).
In almost every species of turtle, there is some
expression of sexual size dimorphism (Berry and Shine,
1980; Gibbons and Lovich, 1990). The difference in size
between the sexes can be expressed as a ratio and typi-
cally shows considerable variation depending on the
population (Gibbons and Lovich, 1990). We initially
tried to score this character with three character states, as
done by Burke et al. (1996), differentiating between
species with larger males, larger females, and equally
sized sexes, but we abandoned that, because exact data
are missing for most ‘batagurid’ taxa. We consequently
only score taxa as being sexually dimorphic if females
are at least 1 .4 times larger than the males. Our scores
are derived from Gibbons and Lovich (1990) and Ernst
and Barbour (1989).
Polarity: Sexual size dimorphism is prevalent in
most outgroups. In spinifera the female is much larger,
in odoratus and serpentina the male tends to be slightly
smaller, in caretta the sexes are of similar size. The out-
group polarity is thus ambiguous, but in the majority of
the ingroup pronounced sexual dimorphism is absent.
Problematic Characters
We encountered difficulties in evaluating a number of
previously used characters, and we provide some sum-
mary statements for those in this section. Most of these
characters were not pursued thoroughly in our study
because we were not able to understand the original
descriptions, were unable recover discrete character
states, or because at an early point in our investigation of
the character we detected significant variation in expres-
sion of character states within taxa. In the latter case
greater sample sizes or new methodological techniques
(e.g., Wiens, 1995; Smith and Gutberlet, 2001) will be
required to tease out a phylogenetic signal.
(A) Frontal contribution to the supratemporal rim
(Hirayama, 1985, 4).
The anterior extent of the upper temporal emargina-
tion is difficult to define in many taxa, and is impossible
to determine in those with a fully emarginated temporal
region (e.g., T. ornata ). The result is a high degree of
ambiguity and a general lack of discrete character states.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 73
(B) Contact between postorbital and quadrate
(Hirayama, 1985, 10).
In the vast majority of ingroup taxa, there is no con-
tact between the postorbital and the quadrate. Such a
contact was observed only in japonica and punctularia
by Hirayama (1985). In specimens of japonica available
to us, we were not able to confirm this contact. CAS
228348 is a skeleton from a diseased specimen of punc-
tularia. On the right side of the skull there is a possible
(but only slight) contact. It is possible that the contact is
actually between the postorbital and the quadratojugal
(Fig. 136). We also found a minimal contact in one spec-
imen of annulata. Given these diverging observations
and the minute contact that is present in our material, we
regard (for now) any contact within the ingroup as an
abnormality.
(C) Absence of the “ posterior process of the postor-
bital” (Hirayama, 1985, 8).
We cannot determine unambiguously what
Hirayama (1985) meant by this character. In our assess-
ment of testudinoids, both a posterolateral and a postero-
medial process of the postorbital can occur. In
Hirayama’s (1985) analysis, only grandis and spinosa
lack a “posterior process of the postorbital.” These
species are also the only ‘batagurid’ taxa to fully lack a
temporal arch. We suspect that this character may some-
how be referring to a lack of a bony temporal arch.
(D) Processus inferior parietalis ‘‘medially approximat-
ing each other, cranial cavity ant eroventr ally narrow-
ing” (Hirayama, 1985, 5; McCord et al., 1995, 7;
Yasukawa et al, 2001, 2).
We acknowledge the validity of this character as
was originally worded by McDowell (1964). However,
we find it difficult to determine how strongly the con-
striction of the brain case must be before it can be con-
sidered present. We were unable to develop unambigu-
ous discrete character states for this feature.
(E) Subdivision of the foramen nervi trigemini (Crumly,
1982; Hirayama, 1985, 6).
This character was used originally by Crumly
(1982) to infer phylogenetic relationships within
‘Testudinidae’. For his ingroup, Crumly (1982)
observed a great amount of polymorphism, with no sin-
gle species either completely lacking or always exhibit-
ing a subdivision of the foramen. He also noted asym-
metry for this character between the left and right side of
some individuals. We confirm the common presence of
a subdivided trigeminal foramen in representatives of
‘Testudinidae,’ and the occasional presence in individu-
als of ‘Emydidae’ and ‘Bataguridae’ (e.g., areolata, den-
tata, flavimaculata, N. platynota , and rubida). A signifi-
cant amount of variation can be observed in two speci-
mens of borneensis available to us, that exhibit left/right
asymmetry and the full spectrum from a fully intact (Fig.
137), to partially subdivided (Fig. 138), to fully subdi-
vided (Fig. 139) trigeminal foramen. Given that most
taxa are represented by three or fewer skulls in our
study, it is apparent that we are not able to fully docu-
ment the amount of variation exhibited by testudinoids.
(F) Contact between postorbital and squamosal
(Hirayama, 1985, 9).
Gaffney et al. (1991) noted that absence of this con-
tact is associated with the upper temporal emargination
and considered it informative at the level of their analy-
sis. Within our ingroup, all turtles have substantial upper
temporal emarginations, resulting in the contact being
just barely present, or just barely absent, or polymorphic
(e.g., picta, petersi , texana, crassicollis). See comments
above under character 9.
(G) Median premaxillary notch (Hirayama, 1985, 19;
Yasukawa et al., 2001, 9)
(H) Large cusps near the suture of the premaxillae and
maxillae (Hirayama, 1985, 28).
Initially, we were faced with the problem of defin-
ing these two characters independently from one anoth-
er, because the presence of two tightly spaced, opposing
cusp-like structures along any margin will automatically
result in the development of a median notch. An addi-
tional problem relating to these characters is the ques-
tion of whether these features should be observed on the
ramphotheca or the maxilla.
Large, tooth-like cusps are clearly present in a num-
ber of taxa (e.g., thurjii ) but so is the full spectrum of
smaller cusps, making it impossible to clearly define
discrete character states. Furthermore, if all species were
evaluated for medial notches that existed even if the
cusps were removed, all taxa in our sample would show
a medial notch. We were unable to develop a consistent
method for scoring this character for all testudinoid
species.
(I) ‘‘Antero-medial portion of the upper triturating sur-
face formed by premaxillae and maxillae” (Hirayama,
1985, 23; Yasukawa et al., 2001, 13).
We are neither able to replicate the full meaning of
this character nor formulate truly discrete character
states. A connection with the development of the second-
ary palate is evident, but the morphology of this region
seems to be sufficiently covered by a number of other
characters.
Vol. 10, p. 74
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
(J) Participation of the vomer in the foramen praepalat-
innm (Crumly, 1982, 10; Hirayama, 1985, 32; Yasukawa
et al., 2001, 15).
Within testudinoid turtles, the foramen praepalat-
inum perforates the nasal cavity at the border between
the premaxilla and the vomer. When the foramen is posi-
tioned slightly more anteriorly, it is fully surrounded by
the premaxilla, when it is minutely farther posterior it is
surrounded by the vomer. Considering the impact of
such minute changes, it is not surprising that our scoring
for this character generally seems to be in conflict with
that of Hirayama (1985) and Crumly (1982). This char-
acter appears to be subject to great intraspecific varia-
tion.
(K) Foramen palatinum posterius enclosed within the
brain cavity (Hirayama, 1985, 34).
According to Hirayama (1985), in reevesii (only)
the foramen palatinum posterius is enclosed within the
region of the brain cavity due to a flared descending
process of the parietal. We cannot confirm this observa-
tion for any testudinoid turtles (including three speci-
mens of reevesii).
(L) Participating bones in the processus trochlearis
oticum (Hirayama 1985, 37; Gaffney and Mey l an, 1988,
Gaffney et al. 1991, 6; McCord et al., 1995, 8; Shaffer et
al., 1997, 74, 258 Yasukawa et al., 2001, 18).
The relative participation of the prootic, parietal,
and quadrate to the processus trochlearis oticum was
used previously by a number of authors to infer phylo-
genetic relationships within turtles. Our observations
confirm the great variety of morphologies that can be
observed in this region. However, the amount of
intraspecific variation is considerable and the full spec-
trum of possible morphologies seems to be filled, mak-
ing it difficult to discern discrete character states. Future
research in the area may result in more clearly defined
discrete character states.
(M) Length of the crista supraoccipitalis (Hirayama,
1985, 40).
A long crista supraoccipitalis was observed by
Hirayama (1985) for borneensis. The character states he
used are defined by relative length of the crista supraoc-
cipitalis to the “condylo-basal length.” Unfortunately,
we could not replicate this because it is not clear exact-
ly how the length of the crista was measured.
Furthermore, a true morphological gap seems to be
missing between the admittedly very long crista of
borneensis and other ‘batagurids’ with an elongated
crista. This character is problematic, because it is poor-
ly defined and lacks discrete character states.
(N) Bony sutures and sulci lost in old adults (Hirayama,
1985, I).
According to Hirayama (1985), loss of sutures and
sulci occurs in baska, borneoensis, and borneensis only.
We are able to confirm this, but we do not have individ-
uals of all other species that are sufficiently old enough
to positively confirm that they also do not exhibit this
feature at old age. In subsequent treatments, loss of
sutures and loss of sulci should be treated as separate
characters.
(O) Ossification of cornu branchiale II (Hirayama,
1985, 48; Yasukawa et al., 2001, 20).
This character was used previously to unite tortois-
es with a number of ‘batagurid’ taxa (Hirayama, 1985).
The hyoid apparatus of turtles is often disarticulated in
skeletal preparations, making is difficult to positively
confirm if an ossified cornu branchiale is present or
absent. However, for those taxa for which we were able
to observe the hyoid apparatus, we were not able to con-
firm Hirayama’s (1985) observation of a reduced cornu
branchiale II in some ‘batagurids’ (e.g., galbinifrons,
spengleri). Instead, these taxa exhibit a cornu branchiale
II that is not significantly different from most other
‘batagurids.’
(P) Double articulation between the fifth and sixth cer-
vical vertebrae (Hirayama, 1985; Gaffney and Mey lan,
1988, FI. 5).
Most articular surfaces of the cervical column are
rather homogenous within all testudinoid turtles
(Williams, 1950). A double articulation between the fifth
and sixth cervical previously was considered to be a
unique character that unites the ‘Emydinae’ (McDowell,
1964). This character also was used by Hirayama (1985)
and with reservations by Gaffney and Meylan (1988).
Our observations generally confirm the presence of a
more or less clear double articulation in most ‘emydids,’
however, this features is also present in a number of
‘batagurids’ confirming that this character is highly vari-
able within the ingroup (Williams, 1950; Gaffney and
Meylan, 1988). Unfortunately, discrete character states
are lacking; we were able to observe the full morpholog-
ical spectrum from a clear singular articulation to a clear
double articulation.
(Q) Scapular prong with lateral concavity (Hirayama,
1985, E).
Hirayama (1985) reported this character as an
autapomorphy for subtrijuga only. However, we cannot
identify this morphology in any of our specimens of sub-
trijuga.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 75
(R) Large facet of the ilium for the testoscapularis and
testoiliacus (Hirayama, 1985, T; Yasukawa et al., 2001,
34)
(S) Extensive development of both testoscapularis and
testoiliacus (Hirayama, 1985, U).
An extensive development of the testoscapularis
and testoiliacus muscles together with an associated
large scar on the ilium was reported by Bramble (1974)
for Asian and North American box turtles. Whereas we
have no reason to doubt his assessment of the develop-
ment of these muscles for box turtles, we were not able
to score this character for most of the remaining taxa.
The shape of the ilium was explored and illustrated for
some ‘emydids’ and ‘batagurids’ by Yasukawa et al.
(2001:122-123).
(T) Ossification of the epipubis (Gaffney and Meylan,
1988, F5.5).
The identification (and confirmation of presence or
absence) of an ossified epipubis (Fig. 141) is somewhat
difficult for most species, because it seems to ossify
rather late in ontogeny, and can fall off during prepara-
tion. Our tentative observations confirm the presence of
an ossified epipubis in numerous adult ‘emydids’ and
‘batagurids,’ typically terrestrial forms (e.g., T. ornata,
G. insculpta , N. platynota, yuwonoi). An improved sam-
ple of adult specimens of all taxa, however, is necessary
to reveal the true distribution of this character.
(U) Diploid Number of Chromosomes (Hirayama, 1985,
0; Shaffer et al., 1997, 43).
The diploid number of chromosomes was used by
Carr and Bickham (1986) to hypothesize a sister group
relationship between the ‘Emydinae’ and subtrijuga, fol-
lowed by borneensis and crassicollis and finally the rest
of the ‘Batagurinae.’ Whereas most ‘batagurids’ alleged-
ly have 52 chromosomes, subtrijuga, borneensis, crassi-
collis, and ‘emydids’ are supposed to have 50 chromo-
somes. We view these results with caution, because a
brief review of the relevant literature reveals great dif-
ferences in chromosomal counts for a variety of taxa.
For instance, according to the work of Killebrew (1977)
and Bickham (1981), amboinensis has 52 chromosomes,
however, Gorman (1973) reported only 50. Similar con-
flicts can also be found for dentata (Bickham, 1981;
DeSmet, 1978; Gorman, 1973; Stock, 1972), subtrijuga
(Bickham, 1981; Killebrew, 1977), trijuga (DeSmet,
1978; Carr and Bickham, 1986), sinensis (Bickham,
1981; Killebrew, 1977; Stock, 1972), crassicollis
(Killebrew, 1977; Stock, 1972; Bickham and Baker,
1976), and some of the species currently placed in
Graptemys (Killebrew, 1977; McKown 1972),
Trachemys (DeSmet, 1978; Killebrew, 1977; Stock,
1972) and Mauremys (Killebrew, 1977; Stock, 1972).
This conflict in primary data is probably best understood
when considering the nature of testudinoid chromo-
somes: whereas 14 pairs of chromosomes have a consid-
erable size, all of the remaining ones are extremely
small. Given these circumstances, it seems reasonable to
hypothesize that one pair of chromosomes may be
unrecognized during analysis.
(V) Plica media spade-shaped (Gaffney and Meylan,
1988, F7.1).
The penile soft anatomy of turtles was comprehen-
sively reviewed by Zug (1966) and one of his characters,
the shape of the plica media, was used by Gaffney and
Meylan (1988) to unify species placed in Chrysemys,
Deirochelys, Trachemys, and Pseudemys as a mono-
phyletic group. In his detailed description of the plica
media, Zug (1966) referred to the shape of this structure
as being “spade-shaped” in those taxa, but made similar
claims for other taxa too. Furthermore, based on the
illustrations that were provided by Zug (1966) for other
taxa, the plica media of species placed in Graptemys,
Malaclemys, Rhinoclemmys, and Platysternon appear
“spade-shaped” also, even though Zug (1966) did not
explicitly use those descriptive words. This anatomical
system should be carefully reevaluated for all testudi-
noids, with special attention given to definition of dis-
crete characters.
(W) Ossifications within the fenestra postotica.
In some taxa, portions of the fenestra postotica are
closed or obscured by ossifications (noted, but without
exemplars, by Gaffney, 1972). In our largest specimen
of grandis (CAS 228443) a short, spike-like ossified
process extends posterodorsally from the dorsal edge of
the quadrate process of the pterygoid, and crosses the
fenestra postotica. It is situated ventral to the stapes (col-
umella auris), medial to the incisura columella auris, and
lateral to the fenestra ovalis (Fig. 141). In some speci-
mens, the dorsal tip of a similar structure approaches or
meets a posterodorsally-inclined process that extends
from the dorsal surface of the pterygoid, near the suture
with the prootic. In our largest specimen of N. platynota
(CAS 228342) the two processes meet to enclose the
stapedial shaft in a ring of bone situated at approximate-
ly the midpoint between the fenestra ovalis and the
medial opening of the incisura columella auris. Our
other, smaller, specimen of N. platynota shows no devel-
opment of these processes. It seems likely that there is
an ontogenetic component in the expression of this fea-
ture. It does not appear to have any systematic signifi-
cance, but in any case it is not widespread within
Testudinoidea.
Vol. 10, p. 76
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Conclusions
Our observations can be used to draw some tenta-
tive conclusions regarding the current level of under-
standing about morphological variation within testudi-
noid turtles. In addition, we provide some cautionary
statements about the quality of morphological data now
in use for assessing systematic relationships among
these turtles. It is clear from a perusal of the relevant lit-
erature, and from our data, that there is reasonably
strong morphological support for a monophyletic
‘Testudinidae.’ Support for monophyly of ‘emydines’
and ‘batagurines’ is not as impressive. The paraphyly of
‘Batagurinae’ (with respect to ‘Testudinidae’) was
explicitly proposed by Hirayama (1985) and has been
generally accepted since that time, although some
strides have been made towards resolving relationships
among some ‘batagurine’ taxa. The monophyly of
‘Emydinae’ seems to have been implicitly assumed by
many workers, but remains to be established in the con-
text of a rigorous phylogenetic analysis of all relevant
taxa. The interpretation of several morphological fea-
tures shared between some ‘emydines’ and some
‘batagurines’ as either convergence or synapomorphy
remains an important and interesting challenge. For
example, there are intriguing morphological similarities
between subtrijuga and some species classified in the
genus Graptemys (e.g., contact of the jugal and descend-
ing process of the parietal; contact of the quadratojugal
with the articular facet of the quadrate; contact between
the quadratojugal and the maxilla; ventral process of the
pterygoid approaching the articular surface of the
quadrate). These similarities may be due to functional
convergence as a result of a molluscivorous diet, but
they raise questions about the propriety of utilizing sub-
trijuga as an outgroup for systematic studies of ‘emy-
dines’ (e.g., Burke et al., 1996). Additional similarities
are reported for chromosome numbers in subtrijuga and
‘emydines’ (see ‘Problematic Character’ U, above).
A seriously deficient understanding of morphologi-
cal variation is one of the greatest inadequacies of cur-
rent perspectives on morphological data in turtles gener-
ally, and testudinoids specifically. Few published studies
have been conducted to evaluate the range and causes of
sexual, ontogenetic, intra- and inter-population variation
in morphological characters within testudinoids. Our
preliminary considerations of ontogenetic variation,
combined with reports of sexual variation (e.g., Berry
and Shine 1980; Gibbons and Lovich, 1990; Stephens,
1998) and new studies exploring the complex interac-
tions of morphological evolution with behavioral char-
acteristics and environmental conditions in turtles (e.g.,
Lindeman, 2000; Herrel et al., 2002; Joyce and Gauthier,
2003; Claude et al., 2003) emphasize the importance of
pursuing these questions further. Our decision not to
produce a phylogenetic hypothesis in this paper was
based primarily on two considerations. The first is the
relatively small sample size we used for many taxa in
this study (although it is comparable to sample sizes
from other, previously published, studies), and the fact
that several taxa are not represented in our work. The
second consideration is our sense that the current under-
standing of morphological variation in testudinoid tur-
tles is insufficiently mature to permit reliable phyloge-
netic hypotheses based solely on morphological data.
The most expedient way to address the need for greater
documentation of variation within testudinoid species is
to utilize existing museum collections to the greatest
extent possible, and secondarily to develop responsible
collecting programs that are designed with this need in
mind.
Our results also indicate that morphological data
matrices currently in the literature should not be taken at
face value. We had particular difficulties replicating
some of the scoring in the Hirayama (1985) matrix. That
seminal analysis (completed prior to the widespread use
of computer-assisted analytical methods in systematics)
laid the foundation for nearly all subsequent work on
‘batagurine’ morphology (including our own), and its
importance in shaping our current conceptualization of
‘batagurine’ phylogeny cannot be overstated. The work
of pathfinders in all fields of inquiry is often subjected
to the greatest scrutiny by the next generation of
researchers. Our statements and contradictory observa-
tions in this paper in no way denigrate Hirayama’s work;
instead, we view our efforts as minor attempts to correct
the few inconsistencies in his analysis, and to contribute
our observations to the body of knowledge that he began
to synthesize 20 years ago.
The accurate interpretation and understanding of
the morphological descriptions of previous authors were
among the great challenges we faced when we began our
studies of testudinoid skeletal morphology. Much of our
confusion could have been averted if adequate illustra-
tions accompanied all published character descriptions,
but such documentation often is an expensive undertak-
ing. Our photographs of character states discussed in
this paper are intended to facilitate communication
among turtle enthusiasts, and to provide a baseline for
future comparisons and discussions about testudinoid
morphology. We hope that adequate illustration of all
newly proposed characters will become standard prac-
tice among turtle systematists. It seems likely that our
interpretations of characters will differ in some respects
from those of our colleagues, and we anticipate that our
decisions regarding ‘problematic characters’ (discussed
above), and our choices with respect to ‘lumping’ or
‘splitting’ previously published character states, will
generate much spirited discussion in the years ahead.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 77
Figure 1. Character 1(0): CAS 228437, texana, Figure 2. Character 1(1): CAS 228404, belliana,
anterior view. anterior view.
Figure 3. Character 2(0): CAS 228458, texana , Figure 4. Character 2(1): CAS 228404, belliana ,
left lateral view. left lateral view.
Figure 5. Character 3(0): CAS 228444, mouhotii ,
left ventrolateral view of orbit.
Figure 6. Character 3(1): CAS 228443, grandis,
left ventrolateral view of orbit.
HM
Vol. 10, p. 78
2004
Figure 7. Character 4(0): CAS 228443, grandis ,
right anterolateral view of orbit.
Figure 8. Character 4(1): CAS 228420, mouhotii,
right anterolateral view of orbit.
Figure 9. Character 5(0): CAS 228444, mouhotii,
left anterolateral view of orbit.
Figure 10. Character 5(1): CAS 228438, texana ,
left anterolateral view of orbit.
Figure 11. Character 6(0): CAS 228443, grandis,
right posterolateral view.
Figure 12. Character 6(1): CAS 228439, texana,
right posterolateral view, postorbital removed.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 79
Figure 13. Character 7(0) and 8(0): CAS 228438, Figure 14. Character 7(1) and 8(1): CAS 228445,
texana, left anterolateral view of orbit. subtrijuga, left anterolateral view of orbit.
Figure 15. Character 9(0): CAS 228447,
orbicularis, left lateral view.
Figure 16. Character 9(1): CAS 228444,
mouhotii, left lateral view.
Figure 17. Character 9(2): YPM 14074,
galbinifrons, left lateral view.
Figure 18. Character 9(2): YPM 14080,
galbinifrons, left lateral view.
Vol. 10, p. 80
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Figure 19. Character 10(0): CAS 228444,
mouhotii, left lateral view.
Figure 20. Character 10(0): CAS 228446,
subtrijuga, left lateral view.
Figure 21. Character 10(1): YPM 10339,
hamiltonii, left lateral view of orbit.
Figure 22. Character 11(0) and 12(0):
CAS 228447, orbicularis, left lateral view.
Figure 23. Character 11(1) and 12(1):
CAS 228446, subtrijuga, left lateral view.
Figure 24. Character 12(1): CAS 228438,
texana, right posteroventral view of lower
temporal fossa.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 81
Figure 25. Character 13(0): CAS 228361,
reevesii, anterior view.
Figure 26. Character 13(0): CAS 228419,
amboinensis , anterior view.
Figure 27. Character 13(1): CAS 228371,
spengleri , anterior view.
Figure 29. Character 14(0): CAS 228443,
grandis , left posterolateral view of orbit.
Figure 28. Character 14(0): CAS 228444,
mouhotii, left posterolateral view of orbit.
Figure 30. Character 14(1): CAS 228438,
texana , left posterolateral view of orbit.
Vol. 10, p. 82
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Figure 31. Character 15(0): CAS 228342,
N. platynota , ventral view of palate.
Figure 32. Character 15(1): CAS 228419,
amboinensis, ventral view of palate.
Figure 33. Character 16(0) and 17(0): ' Figure 34. Character 16(1) and 17(1):
CAS 228447, orbicularis , ventral view of palate. CAS 228420, mouhotii, ventral view of palate.
Figure 35. Character 18(0): CAS 228443, Figure 36. Character 18(1): CAS 228444,
grandis, right lateral view of trigeminal foramen. mouhotii, right dorsolateral view of trigeminal
foramen.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 83
Figure 37. Character 19(0): CAS 228447,
orbicularis, ventral view of palate.
Figure 38. Character 19(1): TMM 2813,
berlandieri, ventral view of palate.
Figure 39. Character 20(0): CAS 228335,
crassicollis, ventral view of palate.
Figure 40. Character 20(1): FMNH 259430,
tentoria, posteroventral view of palate.
Figure 41. Character 21(0): CAS 228443,
grandis, ventral view of brain case.
Figure 42. Character 21(1): CAS 228338,
reticularia, ventral view of brain case.
Vol. 10, p. 84
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Figure 43. Character 22(0): CAS 228443,
grandis , ventromedial view of right basicranium.
Figure 45. Character 23(0): CAS 228437,
texana , right lateral view of quadrate.
Figure 44. Character 22(1): CAS 228445,
subtrijuga , ventromedial view of right
basicranium.
Figure 46. Character 23(1): CAS 228342,
N. platynota, right lateral view of quadrate.
Figure 47. Character 24(0): CAS 228447,
orbicularis , right lateral view of mandible.
Figure 48. Character 24(1): CAS 228335,
crassicollis , right lateral view of mandible.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 85
Figure 49. Character 25(0): CAS 228447,
orbicularis, left lateral view of mandible.
Figure 50. Character 25(1): CAS 228411,
carbonaria, left lateral view of mandible.
V
Figure 51. Character 26(0): CAS 228404,
belliana , left lateral view of mandible.
Figure 52. Character 26(1): CAS 228361,
reevesii, left lateral view of mandible.
Figure 53. Character 27(0): CAS 228361,
reevesii, left posterolateral view of mandible.
Figure 54. Character 27(1): YPM 10861, thurjii,
left posterolateral view of mandible.
Vol. 10, p. 86
2004
Figure 55. Character 28(0): CAS 228342,
N. platynota, ventral view of palate.
Figure 56. Character 28(1) and 29(0):
CAS 228437, texana , ventral view of palate.
Figure 57. Character 28(1) and 29(0):
CAS 228445, subtrijuga , ventral view of palate.
Figure 58. Character 29(0): CAS 228419,
amboinensis , ventral view of palate.
Figure 59. Character 29(1 ): CAS 228361 ,
reevesii , ventral view of palate.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 87
Figure 60. Character 30(0), 31(0), and 32(0):
CAS 228447, orbicularis , oblique ventral view of
palate.
Figure 62. Character 30(1) and 32(1):
TMM 2813, berlandieri, ventral view of palate.
Figure 61. Character 30(1) and 31(1):
CAS 228437, texana , oblique ventral view of
palate.
Figure 63. Character 32(2): CM 124246, petersi,
ventral view of palate.
Figure 64. Character 33(0): CAS 228443,
grandis, dorsal view of mandible.
Figure 65. Character 33(1): CAS 228361,
reevesii, dorsal view of mandible.
Vol. 10, p. 88
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Figure 66. Character 34(0) and 35(0):
CAS 228448, blandingii, dorsal view of
carapace.
Figure 67. Character 34: CAS 228451,
crassicollis , dorsal view of juvenile carapace
showing tricarinae.
Figure 68. Character 34(1) and 35(1):
CAS 228444, mouhotii, dorsal view of carapace.
Figure 69. Character 36(0): CAS 228376, Figure 70. Character 36(1): CM 259430, tentoria
galbinifrons, posterior view of shell. anterior view of shell.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 89
Figure 7 1 . Character 37(0) and 38(0):
CAS 228346, blandingii, dorsal view of
carapace.
Figure 72. Character 37(1) and 38(1):
CAS 228343, spengleri, dorsal view of carapace.
Figure 73. Character 37(2): CAS 228408,
elongata, dorsal view of carapace.
Figure 74. Character 38(2): CAS 228399,
horsfieldi , dorsal view of carapace.
Figure 75. Character 38(3): CAS 228445,
subtrijuga, dorsal view of neurals II - IV.
Vol. 10, p. 90
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Figure 76. Character 39(0): CAS 228399, Figure 77. Character 39(1): CAS 228375,
horsfieldi, posterodorsal view of carapace. Carolina, posterodorsal view of carapace.
Figure 78. Character 40(0): CAS 228371,
spengleri, dorsal view of carapace.
Figure 79. Character 40(1): CAS 228430,
carbonaria, anterodorsal view of carapace.
Figure 80. Character 41(0): CAS 228368,
spinosa, dorsal view of carapace.
Figure 81. Character 41(1): CAS 228450,
N. platynota, dorsal view of carapace.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 91
Figure 82. Character 42(0): CAS 228338, Figure 83. Character 42(1): FMNH 259430,
reticularia , posterodorsal view of carapace. tentoria, posterodorsal view of carapace.
Figure 84. Character 42(2): CAS 228344, emys, Figure 85. Character 43(0): CAS 228413,
posterodorsal view of carapace. insculpta, posterodorsal view of carapace.
Figure 86. Character 43(1): YPM 14678,
platynota, posterodorsal view of carapace.
Figure 87. Character 43(2): CAS 228345,
amboinensis, posterodorsal view of carapace.
Vol. 10, p. 92
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Figure 88. Character 44(0): CAS 228368,
spinosa , dorsal view of carapace.
Figure 89. Character 44(1): CAS 228335,
crassicollis , dorsal view of carapace.
Figure 90. Character 45(0): CAS 228430,
carbonaria , anterodorsal view of carapace.
Figure 92. Character 46(0): YPM 11653,
spengleri, posterodorsal view of carapace.
Figure 91. Character 45(1): CAS 228341,
grandis, dorsal view of first vertebral scute,
anterior to top.
Figure 93. Character 46(1): CAS 228368,
spinosa , posterodorsal view of carapace.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 93
Figure 94. Character 47(0): CAS 228371,
spengleri, dorsal view of carapace.
Figure 95. Character 47(1): YPM 10382,
blandingii , dorsal view of carapace.
Figure 96. Character 48(0): CAS 228450, Figure 97. Character 48(1): CAS 228430,
N. platynota, left dorsolateral view of carapace. carbonaria, left dorsolateral view of carapace.
Figure 98. Character 49(0): CAS 228458, texana
(left); 49(1): CAS 228341, grandis (right); dorsal
view of pygals.
Figure 99. Character 49(2): CAS 228449,
pardalis , posterior view of carapace.
Vol. 10, p. 94
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Figure 100. Character 50(0): CAS 228399,
horsfieldi, lateral view of carapace.
Figure 101. Character 50(1): CAS 228375,
Carolina , lateral view of carapace.
Figure 102. Character 51(0): CAS 228342,
platynota, ventral view of anterior plastral lobe.
Figure 104. Character 51(2): CAS 228408,
elongata, internal view of shell from posterior.
Figure 103. Character 51(1): CAS 228419,
amboinensis, ventral view of anterior plastral
lobe.
Figure 105. Character 51(3): CAS 228406,
insculpta , internal view of shell from posterior.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 95
Figure 106. Character 51(4): YPM 14073, thurjii, Figure 107. Character 52(0): YPM 691, Carolina ,
left ventral view of first thoracic rib. ventral view of posterior plastral lobe.
Figure 108. Character 52(1): CAS 228434,
blandingii, ventral view of posterior plastral
lobe.
Figure 110. Character 52(3): CAS 228361,
reevesii, medial view of partial right shell.
Figure 109. Character 52(2): CAS 228349,
pardalis, medial view of partial right shell.
Figure 111. Character 52(4): CAS 228341,
grandis , medial view of partial right shell.
Vol. 10, p. 96
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Figure 112. Character 53(0): CAS 228447,
orbicularis, ventral view of carapace.
Figure 114. Character 54(0): CAS 228399,
horsfieldi, ventral view of shell.
Figure 113. Character 53(1): CAS 228345,
amboinensis (left); CAS 228373, blandingii
(right); ventral view of carapaces.
Figure 115. Character 54(1): CAS 228345,
amboinensis, ventral view of shell.
Figure 117. Character 55(1): YPM 12653, erosa,
right posterolateral view of carapace.
Figure 116. Character 55(0): CAS 228403,
tornieri, right posterolateral view of carapace.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 97
Figure 120. Character 59(0): CAS 228416,
impressa , dorsal view of epiplastra.
Figure 121. Character 59(1): CAS 228397,
carbonaria , dorsal view of epiplastra.
Figure 118. Character 57(0): CAS 228335,
crassicollis , anterior view of shell.
Figure 119. Character 58(0): CAS 228335,
crassicollis, posterior view of shell.
Figure 122. Character 60(0): CAS 228437,
texana, ventral view of anterior plastral lobe.
Figure 123. Character 60(1): CAS 228345,
amboinensis, ventral view of anterior plastral
lobe.
Vol. 10, p. 98
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Figure 124. Character 61(0): CAS 228437,
texana , ventral view of posterior plastral lobe.
Figure 126. Character 61(2): CAS 228376,
galbinifrons , ventral view of posterior plastral
lobe.
Figure 128. Character 63(0): CAS 228450,
platynota, ventral view of plastron.
Figure 125. Character 61(1): YPM 14678,
N. platynota, ventral view of posterior plastral
lobe.
Figure 127. Character 62(0): CAS 228345,
amboinensis (left); 62(1): CAS 228376,
galbinifrons (right); ventral view of anal scutes.
Figure 129. Character 63(1): CAS 228368,
spinosa, ventral view of plastron.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 99
Figure 130. Character 64(1) and 65(1):
TNHC 62532, ornata, lateral view of right
scapulacoracoid.
Figure 132. Character 67(0) and 68(0):
YPM 14677, blandingii, top view of lower arm
and manus.
Figure 134. Character 69(0): YPM 2983,
terrapin, top view of lower arm and manus.
Figure 131. Character 66(0): CAS 228345,
amboinensis (left); 66(1): CAS 228397,
carbonaria (right); coracoids.
Figure 133. Character 67(1) and 68(1):
YPM 16450, horsfieldi, top view of lower arm
and manus.
Figure 135. Character 69(1): YPM 14445,
spengleri, top view of lower arm and manus.
Vol. 10, p. 100
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Figure 136. CAS 228348, punctularia, right
lateral view.
Figure 137. FMNH 224107, borneoensis, left
anterolateral view of trigeminal foramen.
Figure 138. FMNH 224107, borneoensis, right
anterolateral view of trigeminal foramen.
Figure 139. FMNH 224122, borneoensis , right
anterolateral view of trigeminal foramen.
Figure 140. CAS 228378, Carolina, dorsal view Figure 141. CAS 228443, grandis,
of pelvis. posteroventral view of otic region.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 101
As practicing vertebrate paleontologists, we also
hope that our efforts here will stimulate additional inves-
tigation and publication of the extensive fossil record of
testudinoid turtles. Morphology is, of course, of para-
mount importance for the interpretation of fossils. Our
visits to many museums in the last several years
revealed an abundance of unpublished testudinoid fossil
material. Although a phylogenetic analysis was not a
goal of this research, we adopt the convenient and now
familiar means of summarizing morphological data by
providing a character matrix that summarizes some of
our observations. Although character data can be used to
assist paleontologists in diagnosing fossil testudinoid
specimens, we also encourage paleontologists to utilize
our study as a starting point for basic morphologic
descriptions. Description of differential diagnostic char-
acters generally is an adequate minimum for the erection
of a new taxon. However, such a diagnosis is, in itself,
not particularly helpful to systematists trying to score a
matrix and place a fossil into a broader phylogenetic
context. Descriptions of new fossil specimens (and taxa)
will be most useful if they include discussions of char-
acter state data for all preserved anatomical regions.
This current summary of morphological characters that
traditionally are used in systematic treatments of testudi-
noids can be used as a preliminary guide to the anatom-
ical regions and features that would be most useful when
included as part of a description of new fossil material.
Acknowledgements
We are greatly indebted to a number of institutions
and their staff for providing generous access to skeletal
and wet specimens: Jens Vindum (CAS), Stephen
Rogers and John Wiens (CM), Alan Resetar and
Maureen Kearney (FMNH), John Simmons and Linda
Trueb (KU), Jim McGuire (LMNH), Jose Rosado
(MCZ), Travis LaDuc and David Cannatella (TMM),
Harold Dundee (TUMNH), and Gregory Caldwell-
Watkins and Jacques Gauthier (YPM). We extend our
thanks to Rick Van Dyke for the gift of specimens to
support this research. Gabe Bever, Julien Claude, Jason
Downs, Jacques Gauthier, Jason Head, Pat Holroyd,
Howard Hutchison, Lyndon K. Murray, Jim Parham, and
Krister Smith (in alphabetical order) provided useful
comments and criticisms regarding this project. All
images containing YPM specimens were reproduced
with courtesy of the Peabody Museum of Natural
History, Yale University, New Haven, CT. Special
thanks go to Ted Papenfuss and Jim Parham for provid-
ing us with the unique opportunity to publish the results
of this study, and to Julien Claude and Howard
Hutchison for their detailed and insightful reviews. The
Brett Stems Award for Chelonian Research (CAS), the
Visiting Scholar Fund (FMNH), and Yale University
Graduate Fellowships provided funding to WGJ.
Additional financial support was provided by the
Geology Foundation of The University of Texas at
Austin.
Literature Cited
Agassiz, L. 1857. Contributions to the Natural History
of the United States of America. First Monograph.
Part II. North American Testudinata. Pp. 235-452,
Plates 1-7. Little, Brown and Company, Boston.
Auffenberg, W. 1974. Checklist of fossil land tortoises
(Testudinidae). Bulletin of the Florida State
Museum, Biological Sciences 18:121-251.
Berry, J. F., and R. Shine. 1980. Sexual size dimorphism
and sexual selection in turtles (Order Testudines).
Oecologia 44: 1 85- 1 9 1 .
Bickham, J. W. 1981. Two-hundred-million-year-old
chromosomes: Deceleration of the rate of karyotyp-
ic evolution in turtles. Science 212:1291-1293.
Bickham, J. W., and R. J. Baker. 1976. Chromosome
homology and evolution of emydid turtles.
Chromosoma 54:201-219.
Bickham, J. W., T. Lamb, P. Minx, and J. C. Patton.
1996. Molecular systematics of the genus Clemmys
and the intergeneric relationships of emydid turtles.
Herpetologica 52:89-97.
Boulenger, G. A. 1889. Catalogue of the Chelonians,
Rhynchocephalians, and Crocodiles in the British
Museum (Natural History). New Edition. Taylor
and Francis, London. 311 pp., Plates 1-6.
Bourret, R. 1941. Les tortues de l’lndochine avec une
note sur la peche et Televage des tortues de mer par
F. Le Poulain. L’Institut Oceanographique de
l’lndochine. Imprimerie G. Taupin & Cie, Hanoi.
235 pp.
Bramble, D. M. 1971. Functional morphology, evolu-
tion, and paleoecology of gopher tortoises. Ph.D.
Thesis. University of California, Berkeley. 341 pp.
Bramble, D. M. 1974. Emydid shell kinesis:
Biomechanics and evolution. Copeia 1974:707-727.
Burke, R. L., T. E. Leuteritz, and A. J. Wolf. 1996.
Phylogenetic relationships of emydine turtles.
Herpetologica 52:572-584.
Vol. 10, p. 102
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Carr, J. L., and J. W. Bickham. 1986. Phylogenetic
implications of karyotypic variation in the
Batagurinae (Testudines: Emydidae). Genetica
70:89-106.
Claude, J., E. Paradis, H. Tong, and J.-C. Auffray. 2003.
A geometric morphometric assessment of the
effects of environment and cladogenesis on the evo-
lution of the turtle shell. Biological Journal of the
Linnean Society 79:485-501.
Coker, R. E. 1905. Gadow’s hypothesis of “orthogenet-
ic variation” in Chelonia. The Johns Hopkins
University Circular 178:489-504.
Coker, R. E. 1910. Diversity in the scutes of Chelonia.
Journal of Morphology 21:1-75, Plates 1-14.
Crumly, C. R. 1982. A cladistic analysis of Geochelone
using cranial osteology. Journal of Herpetology
16:215-234.
Crumly, C. R. 1985 (“1984”). A hypothesis for the rela-
tionships of land tortoise genera (Family
Testudinidae). Studia Geologica Salmaticensia
Volumen Especial 1: Studia Palaeocheloniologica
1:115-124.
Crumly, C. R. 1994. Phylogenetic systematics of North
American tortoises (Genus Gopherus ): Evidence
for their classification. Pp. 7-32. In R. B. Bury and
D. J. Germano (eds.), Biology of North American
Tortoises. United States Department of the Interior,
National Biological Survey, Fish and Wildlife
Research 13.
Danilov, I. G., and V. B. Sukhanov. 2001. New data on
lindholmemydid turtle Lindholmemys from the Late
Cretaceous of Mongolia. Acta Palaeontologica
Polonica 46:125-131.
DeSmet, W. H. O. 1978. The chromosomes of 11 species
of Chelonia (Reptilia). Acta Zoologica et
Pathologica Antverpiensia 70: 15-34.
Ernst, C. H., and R. W. Barbour. 1989. Turtles of the
World. Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington,
D. C. 313 pp.
Feldman, C. R., and J. F. Parham. 2002. Molecular phy-
logenetics of emydine turtles: Taxonomic revision
and the evolution of shell kinesis. Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution 22:388-398.
Gaffney, E. S. 1972. An illustrated glossary of turtle
skull nomenclature. American Museum Novitates
2486:1-33.
Gaffney, E. S. 1975. A phylogeny and classification of
the higher categories of turtles. Bulletin of the
American Museum of Natural History 155:387-436.
Gaffney, E. S. 1985 (“1984”). Progress towards a natu-
ral hierarchy of turtles. Studia Geologica
Salmaticensia Volumen Especial 1: Studia
Palaeocheloniologica 1:125-131.
Gaffney, E. S. 1979. Comparative cranial morphology of
recent and fossil turtles. Bulletin of the American
Museum of Natural History 164:65-376.
Gaffney, E. S., and P. A. Meylan. 1988. A phylogeny of
turtles. Pp. 157-219. In M. J. Benton (ed.), The
Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods,
Volume 1: Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds. The
Systematics Association Special Volume 35A,
Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Gaffney, E. S., P. A. Meylan, and A. R. Wyss. 1991. A
computer assisted analysis of the relationships of
the higher categories of turtles. Cladistics 7:313-
335.
Gibbons, J. W., and J. E. Lovich. 1990. Sexual dimor-
phism in turtles with emphasis on the slider turtle
( Trachemys scripta). Herpetological Monogrpahs
4:1-29.
Gorman, G. C. 1973. The chromosomes of the Reptilia,
a cytotaxonomic interpretation. Pp. 349-424. In A.
B. Chiarelli and E. Capanna (eds.), Cytotaxonomy
and Vertebrate Evolution. Academic Press, New
York.
Gray, J. E. 1855. Catalogue of Shield Reptiles in the
Collection of the British Museum, Part 1:
Testudinata (Tortoises). Taylor and Francis,
London. 79 pp.
Gray, J. E. 1870. Supplement to the Catalogue of Shield
Reptiles in the Collection of the British Museum.
Part 1 : Testudinata (Tortoises). Taylor and Francis.
London. 120 pp.
Herrel, A., J. C. O’Reilly, and A. M. Richmond. 2002.
Evolution of bite performance in turtles. Journal of
Evolutionary Biology 15:1083-1094.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 103
Hirayama, R. 1985 (“1984”). Cladistic analysis of
batagurine turtles (Batagurinae: Emydidae:
Testudinoidea); a preliminary result. Studia
Geologica Salmaticensia Volumen Especial 1:
Studia Palaeocheloniologica 1:141-157.
Hirayama, R., D. B. Brinkman, and I. G. Danilov. 2000.
Distribution and biogeography of non-marine
Cretaceous turtles. Russian Journal of Herpetology
7:181-198.
Honda, M., Y. Yasukawa, and H. Ota. 2002. Phylogeny
of the Eurasian freshwater turtles of the genus
Mauremys Gray 1869 (Testudines), with special ref-
erence to a close affinity of Mauremys japonica
with Chinemys reevesii. Journal of Zoological
Systematics and Evolutionary Research 40:195-
200.
Hutchison, J. H. 1991. Early Kinosteminae (Reptilia:
Testudines) and their phylogenetic significance.
Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 11:145-167.
Iverson, J. B., P. Q. Spinks, H. B. Shaffer, W. P. McCord,
and I. Das. 2002 (“2001”). Phylogenetic relation-
ships among the Asian tortoises of the genus
Indotestudo (Reptilia: Testudines: Testudinidae).
Hamadryad 26:272-275.
Joyce, W. G., and J. A. Gauthier. 2003. Palaeoecology of
Triassic stem turtles sheds new light on turtle ori-
gins. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London,
Series B, Biological Sciences 271:1-5.
Khosatzky, L. I., and M. Mlynarski. 1971. Chelonians
from the upper Cretaceous of the Gobi Desert,
Mongolia. Pp. 131-144, Plates 22-24. In Z. Kielan-
Jaworowska (ed.), Results of the Polish-Mongolian
Palaeontological Expeditions - Part III.
Palaeontologia Polonica 25.
Killebrew, F. C. 1977. Mitotic chromosomes of turtles.
IV. The Emydidae. The Texas Journal of Science
29:245-253.
Kluge, A. G. 1991. Boine snake phylogeny and research
cycles. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology
Miscellaneous Publications 178:1-58.
Lindeman, P. V. 2000. Evolution of the relative width of
the head and alveolar surfaces in map turtles
(Testudines: Emydidae: Graptemys). Biological
Journal of the Linnean Society 69:549-576.
Lindholm, W. A. 1929. Revidiertes Verzeichnis der
Gattungen der rezenten Schildkroten nebst Notizen
zur Nomenklatur einiger Arten. Zoologischer
Anzeiger 8 1 :275-272.
McCord, W. P, J. B. Iverson, and Boeadi. 1995. A new
batagurid turtle from northern Sulawesi, Indonesia.
Chelonian Conservation and Biology 1:311-316.
McCord, W. P, J. B. Iverson, P. Q. Spinks, and H. B.
Shaffer. 2000. A new genus of geoemydid turtle
from Asia. Hamadryad 25:86-90.
McDowell, S. B. 1964. Partition of the genus Clemmys
and related problems in the taxonomy of the aquat-
ic Testudinidae. Proceedings of the Zoological
Society of London 143:239-279.
McKown, R. R. 1972. Phylogenetic relationships within
the turtle genera Graptemys and Malaclemys. Ph.D.
Thesis. The University of Texas at Austin. 112 pp.
Mlynarski, M. 1976. Handbuch der Palaoherpetologie.
Teil 7. Testudines. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart,
New York. 130 pp.
Newman, H. H. 1906. The significance of scute and
plate “abnormalities” in Chelonia. Biological
Bulletin 10:68-114.
Nick, L. 1912. Das Kopfskelet von Dermochelys cori-
acea L. Zoologische Jahrbticher, Abteilung fur
Anatomie und Ontogenie der Tiere 33:1-238.
Pritchard, P. C. H. 1979. Encyclopedia of Turtles. T.F.H.
Publications, Inc., Ltd. Neptune, New Jersey. 895
pp.
Rhodin, A. G. J. 2000. Publisher’s editorial: Turtle sur-
vival crisis. Turtle and Tortoise Newsletter 1:2-3.
Shaffer, H. B., P. Meylan, and M. L. McKnight. 1997.
Tests of turtle phylogeny: Molecular, morphologi-
cal, and paleontological approaches. Systematic
Biology 46:235-268.
Siebenrock, F. 1909. Synopsis der rezenten
Schildkroten, mit Berucksichtigung der in his-
torischer Zeit ausgestorbenen Arten. Zoologische
Jahrbucher, Supplement 10:427-618.
Sites. J. W. Jr., J. W. Bickham, B. A. Pytel, I. F.
Greenbaum, and B. A. Bates. 1984. Biochemical
Vol. 10, p. 104
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
characters and the reconstruction of turtle phytoge-
nies: Relationships among batagurine genera.
Systematic Zoology 33:137-158.
Smith, E. N., and R. L. Gutberlet Jr. 2001. Generalized
frequency coding: A method of preparing polymor-
phic multistate characters for phylogenetic analysis.
Systematic Biology 50:156-169.
Smith, M. 1931. The Fauna of British India, Including
Ceylon and Burma. Reptilia and Amphibia. Vol. I. -
Loricata, Testudines. Taylor & Francis Ltd.,
London. 185 pp.
Stephens, R R. 1998. Variation in the cranial osteologi-
cal morphology of turtles in the genus Graptemys
(Reptilia; Anapsida; Testudines; Cryptodira;
Emydidae; Deirochelyinae). M.S. Thesis.
University of South Alabama. 197 pp.
Stephens, P. R., and J. J. Wiens. 2003. Ecological diver-
sification and phytogeny of emydid turtles.
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 79:577-
610.
Stock, A. D. 1972. Karyological relationships in turtles
(Reptilia: Chelonia). Canadian Journal of Genetics
and Cytology 14:859-868.
Sukhanov, V. B. 2000. Mesozoic turtles of middle and
central Asia. Pp. 309-367. In M. J. Benton, M. A.
Shishkin, D. M. Unwin, and E. N. Kurochkin (eds.),
The Age of Dinosaurs in Russia and Mongolia.
Cambridge University Press, New York.
Theobald, W. 1868. Catalogue of reptiles in the museum
of the Asiatic Society of Bengal. Journal of the
Asiatic Society, Extra Number, 1868:8-88.
Tinkle, D. W. 1962. Variation in shell morphology of
North American turtles I. The carapacial seam
arrangements. Tulane Studies in Zoology 9:331-
349.
van Dijk, P. P, B. L. Stuart, and A. G. J. Rhodin, eds.
2000. Asian Turtle Trade. Proceedings of a
Workshop on Conservation and Trade of Freshwater
Turtles and Tortoises in Asia, Phnom Penh,
Cambodia, 1-4 December 1999. Chelonian
Research Monographs 2.
Waagen, G. N. 1972. Musk glands in recent turtles. M.S.
Thesis. University of Utah. 64 pp.
Wiens, J. J. 1995. Polymorphic characters in phyloge-
netic systematics. Systematic Biology 44:482-500.
Williams, E. E. 1950. Variation and selection in the cer-
vical central articulations of living turtles. Bulletin
of the American Museum of Natural History
94:505-562.
Wu, P., K.-Y. Zhou, and Q. Yang. 1999. Phytogeny of
Asian freshwater and terrestrial turtles based on
sequence of 12S rRNA gene fragments. Acta
Zoologica Sinica 45:260-267. (In Chinese with
English summary).
Yasukawa, Y., R. Hirayama, and T. Hikida. 2001.
Phylogenetic relationships of geoemydine turtles
(Reptilia: Bataguridae). Current Herpetology
20:105-133.
Zangerl, R. 1948. The methods of comparative anatomy
and its contribution to the study of evolution.
Evolution 2:351-374.
Zangerl, R. 1969. The turtle shell. Pp. 311-339. In C.
Gans, A. d’A. Bellairs, and T. S. Parsons (eds.),
Biology of the Reptilia Volume 1, Morphology A.
Academic Press, New York.
Zangerl, R., and R. G. Johnson. 1957. The nature of
shield abnormalities in the turtle shell. Fieldiana:
Geology 10:341-362.
Zdansky, O. 1924. Uber die Temporalregion des
Schildkrotenschadels. Bulletin of the Geological
Institution of the University of Upsala 19:89-114.
Zug, G. R. 1966. The penial morphology and the rela-
tionships of cryptodiran turtles. Occasional Papers
of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan
647:1-24.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 105
Appendix 1
List of specimens used.
agassizii, CAS 33867, FMNH 216746, FMNH 250843;
alabamensis , CM 95968, CM 95991; amboinensis, CAS
153872, CAS 228345, CAS 228369, CAS 228412, CAS
228419, FMNH 224009; annandalei , FMNH 258876,
FMNH 258879, FMNH Moll3036; annulata, CAS
SUR7425, CM 87903, YPM 15410; arachnoides, MCZ
54050; areolatus , MCZ 42214; areolata , CM 47957,
CM 87904; barbouri, CAS SUR12063, TUMNH 15400,
TUMNH 15428, TUMNH 15429, TUMNH 16899;
basket, FMNH 224095, FMNH 224097, FMNH 224213,
FMNH 224124, FMNH 224226; bealei, CM 118554,
FMNH 255270, FMNH 226542; belliana, CAS 228394,
CAS 228404; berlandieri , TNHC 2813; blandingii,
CAS 12837, CAS 228346, CAS 228373, CAS 228434,
CAS 228448, YPM 14677, YPM 10382; borneensis ,
FMNH 224001, FMNH 224003, FMNH 224004,
FMNH 224005, FMHH 224140; borneoensis, FMNH
224107, FMNH 224122, FMNH 224129, FMNH
251499, MCZ 42198; carbonaria , CAS 228397, CAS
228411, CAS 228427, CAS 228430; caretta, CAS 8383,
FMNH 31021; Carolina , CAS 228375, CAS 228378;
caspica, CAS 141118, CM 118517, FMNH 19714,
FMNH 74505, FMNH 98764; chilensis, CM 112252;
coahuila, KU 46929, KU 92623, MCZ 120335; crassi-
collis, CAS 228335, CAS 228451, FMNH 11091, MCZ
7821, MCZ 134451; decor ata, CM 118590; dentata,
CAS 134332, KU 47170, MCZ 29567, CAS 228333,
CAS 228362, CAS 228414; elegans, CAS 228396; elon-
gata , CAS 228408, FMNH 183740, FMNH 257382;
emys, CAS 228344, FMNH 63749, FMNH 224034; ern-
sti, TUMNH 13460, TUMNH 13462, TUMNH 16899;
erosa, YPM 12653; flavimaculata , TUMNH 15375,
TUMNH 15404, TUMNH 15747, TUMNH 15787;
flavomarginata, CAS 18040, CAS 228356, CAS
228357, CAS 228359, FMNH 21651 5\flavomarginatus,
MCZ 1 64926 \forsteni, CAS 228433; galbinifrons, CAS
228358, CAS 228360, CAS 228367, CAS 228376, YPM
14074, YPM 14080; geographica , CAS 12809,
TUMNH 15391, TUMNH 15392, TUMNH 15410,
TUMNH 15430; geometricus, MCZ 32184; gibba, CAS
228392; graeca, CAS 217732, CAS 228435, LMNH
54855, LMNH 54861; grandis , CAS 228341, CAS
228443, FMNH 224038, YPM 15431; guttata , CAS
8696, CAS 228372, CAS 228386, FMNH 211573;
hamiltonii , MCZ 120333, YPM 10399; hermanni, CAS
228400, CAS 228401, CAS 228402; homeana , CAS
228409, CAS 228423, CAS 228428, CAS 228429, CAS
228455, FMNH 19794; horsfieldi , CAS 120707, CAS
228398, CAS 228399, CAS 228421, CAS 228425, YPM
16450; impressa, CAS 228416; G. insculpta, CAS
228406, CAS 228407, CAS 228413; japonica, YPM
15482, YPM 15486; kachuga, FMNH 224128, FMNH
224152; kleinmanni, CAS 228422, CAS 228426, CAS
228431; kohnii, TUMNH 10237, TUMNH 12121,
TUMNH 14544, TUMNH 15678; leprosa, CM 137031;
marmorata, CAS no number, CAS 188533, CAS
220052, FMNH 22076; mouhotii, CAS 228365, CAS
228374, CAS 228420, CAS 228444; muhlenbergii,
LMNH 55352, MCZ 52248; mutica, LMNH 54883; P.
nelsoni, CM 67311; nigra, CAS 8125, CAS 8289;
nigrinoda , TUMNH 15147, TUMNH 15317, TUMNH
15408, TUMNH 15750; ocellata, CAS 228336; G.
oculifera, TUMNH 26, TUMNH 3359, TUMNH 7548,
TUMNH 12402, TUMNH 16928; P. oculifera , CAS
165598, CAS 220645, CAS 220646; odoratus, YPM
13622, CAS 228351, CAS 228352, CAS 228353; orbic-
ularis, CAS 173223, CAS 228347, CAS 228415, CAS
228447, LMNH 10347, YPM 15479; T. ornata, CAS
228381, CAS 228382, CAS 228383, CAS 228384,
TNHC 62532; ouachitensis, CM 61656, CM 84696;
pardalis, CAS 148630, CAS 228349, CAS 228410,
CAS 228418, CAS 228432, CAS 228449; petersi, CAS
8608, CM 124246, CM 124247; picta, CAS 13889, CAS
228379, CAS 228380, CAS 228385; N. platynota, CAS
228342, CAS 228450, CM 118586, FMNH 224216,
YPM 14678; polyphemus, CAS 14090, LMNH 43344,
LMNH 43354, LMNH 59320; pulcherrima, CAS
11754, CAS 228355, CAS 228366, CAS 228377; pul-
chra, LMNH 48092; punctularia, YPM 465, CAS
228348; reevesii, CAS 31437, CAS 228361, CAS
228364; reticularia, CAS 228338, CAS 228388, LMNH
14565, LMNH 14569, LMNH 49145, LMNH 54856,
LMNH 78580; rubida, CM 87907, CM 87908;
rubriventris, CM 34409, CM 45188; scripta, CAS
SUR8642, CAS 228436, CAS 228442, LMNH 15684;
serpentina, CAS 228452, YPM 6369, CAS 228457;
siebenrocki, CAS 228393; signatus, CAS 228405, MCZ
42217, MCZ 42218; sinensis, CAS 18031, CAS
228339; spengleri, CAS 21008, CAS 228331, CAS
228332, CAS 228343, CAS 228371, YPM 11653, YPM
14445; spinifera, CAS 65705, CAS 228350, CAS
228354, YPM 656; spinosa, CAS 228368. CAS 228459;
subglobosa, CAS 228334; subtrijuga, CAS 16996, CAS
228445, CAS 228446, CAS 228453, CAS 228454; sub-
rufa, CAS 228389, CAS 228390, CAS 228391; tchepo-
nensis, CAS 228363, CAS 228370; tecta, CM 89923;
tentoria, FMNH Moll3026, FMNH Moll3028, FMNH
Moll3032, FMNH 259430; tentorius, MCZ 41944,
MCZ 46604; terrapin, CAS 43640, CAS 228340, CAS
228387, YPM 2983; texana , CAS 30965, CAS 228437,
CAS 228438, CAS 228439, CAS 228440, CAS 228441,
CAS 228456, CAS 228458; thurjii, FMNH 224135,
FMNH 224153, MCZ 62523, MCZ 62524, YPM 14072,
YPM 14073, YPM 14074; tornieri, CAS 139704, CAS
228395, CAS 228403, CAS 228417, CAS 228424; tri-
Vol. 10, p. 106
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Aldabrachelys, Dipsochelys,
Geochelone, Megalochelys
Geochelone
Geochelone, Indotestudo
Chrysemys , Pseudemys, Trachemys
Geochelone, Manouria
Graptemys
Kinixys
Homopus
Graptemys, Malaclemys
Cistoclemmys, Cuora, Geoemyda
Gopherus
Chrysemys, Pseudemys
Geochelone, Indotestudo, Manouria
Callopsis, Geoemyda, Rhinoclemmys
Chrysemys, Pseudemys, Trachemys
Cistoclemmys, Cuora
Graptemys, Malaclemys
Psammobates
Graptemys
Testudo
Geoemyda, Heosemys
Clemmys
Geoclemys
Testudo
Kinixys
Agrionemys, Testudo
Geochelone, Manouria
Calemys, Clemmys, Glyptemys
Clemmys, Mauremys
Kachuga
Pseudotestudo, Testudo
Graptemys
Clemmys, Mauremys
Geoemyda, Heosemys
Kinixys
Testudo
Clemmys, Emys
Geoemyda, Rhinoclemmys
Cuora, Cyclemys, Geoemyda, Pyxidea
Calemys, Clemmys, Glyptemys
Clemmys, Mauremys
Callopsis, Geoemyda, Rhinoclemmys
Kinixys
Chrysemys, Pseudemys, Trachemys
Chrysemys, Pseudemys
Terrapene
Chelonoidis, Geochelone
Chinemys
Graptemys, Malaclemys
Morenia
Graptemys, Malaclemys
Psammobates
Cyclemys
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 107
Vol. 10, p. 108
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 109
10110
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, pp. 110-113
Trade Data and Some Comments On the Distribution of
Mauremys annamensis (Siebenrock, 1903)
Minh Le1’*, Thang Hoang2, and Due Le3
1 American Museum of Natural History, Department of Herpetology,
Central Park West at 79th Street New York, NY 10024
-19th Le Thanh Tong St., Hanoi, Vietnam
3 WWF Indochina Programme, 53-Tran Phu St., Ba Dinh, Hanoi, Vietnam; IPO Box 151, Hanoi, Vietnam
* E-mail: minhl@amnh.org
Abstract. - This trade survey of Annam Pond Turtle reveals that this species is likely to have larger distribution than
previously thought. The records in the trade in Quy Nhon and Ho Chi Minh City suggest its range could extend much
further south. In addition, given the one way south-north trade route, the absence of Mauremys mutica in the trade
south of Hai Van Pass and the reported absence of M. annamensis in the trade north of the Pass support the hypoth-
esis that the Pass is the natural barrier for the two species ranges. This hypothesis combined with the long existence
of the Pass might indicate that the speciation between the two species happened when their ancestors dispersed across
the Pass, and were subsequently isolated, by the means of rafting or walking through narrow land strip emerged dur-
ing the low sea level period. In terms of conservation, M. annamensis has become much rarer even in the trade, sug-
gesting immediate conservation measures to protect it.
Key words. - Mauremys annamensis, Bataguridae, Hai Van Pass, Truong Son Range, distribution, biogeography.
Distribution of Mauremys annamensis. - The Annam
Pond Turtle, Mauremys annamensis, was first described
by Siebenrock in 1903 based on a specimen collected
from Phuc Son or Phuoc Son (15° 33' 00" N; 108° 04'
00" E) (southwest of Tourane, now known as the city of
Da Nang) in Central Vietnam. Another specimen was
collected by Bourret from Fai Fo (Hoi An), an ancient
city about 50 km from Da Nang (Bourret, 1941). Since
then, it seems that little effort has been made to record
the distribution of this species in the wild. Iverson
(1992) and Iverson et al. (1999) cite only the above
records from Bourret for their maps of global turtle dis-
tribution.
According to Bourret (1941), this species was very
abundant in the marshes and slow-moving water bodies
in the lowland areas of the cities of Hoi An and Da
Nang. Both Hoi An and Da Nang, however, are now
very populated cities surrounded by rice paddies, which
are unlikely to be suitable habitats for this species. This
is because the intensive use of chemicals, such as herbi-
cides and pesticides, in rice paddies through out Vietnam
makes it difficult for turtles to survive in this environ-
ment.
To better understand its distribution, we did a 6-day
trade survey in the August of 1996. The survey covered
three cities, namely Quy Nhon (13° 46’ 00” N; 109° 14’
00” E), Da Nang, and Hue (16° 28' 00" N; 107° 36’ 00"
E), and their surrounding areas. We interviewed turtle
dealers at the collecting points, where turtles were
bought from collectors and awaited to be shifted to
China. We used the book Turtles of the World (Ernst and
Barbour, 1989) for identification key. In addition, since
the initial purpose of the survey is to determine the trade
status of M. annamensis, we identified, but did not
record the availability of other turtle species in the col-
lecting points.
We observed that this species was still common in
the trade in Quy Nhon and Da Nang. In Quy Nhon and
its outskirt, we visited three collecting points. In the first
one, we identified 2 adult M. annamensis. In the other
two collecting points, we found 3 and 4 juveniles,
respectively. In Da Nang and its surrounding areas, we
visited four sites with three to four specimens in each
sites. They were all young and juvenile turtles. From the
interviews with local people in Quy Nhon and Da Nang,
it was apparent that this species could well survive in the
human-modified environment, such as lakes and fish-
ponds, if there were no collecting activities by local peo-
ple. Local trade dealers and collectors, encountered in
collecting points in Quy Nhon and Da Nang, suggested
that this species still existed in the water bodies in the
nearby region. Le and Trinh (2001) also indicated that
the species could occur in Tra My, Tien Phuoc, and
probably Hiep Due Districts, Quang Nam Province.
The occurrence of M. annamensis in Quy Nhon is
very interesting since this species had been believed to
have very restricted distribution. More remarkably, Le
and Broad (1995) reported that M. annamensis even
extended far south to Ca Mau, Minh Hai Province inhab-
iting Melaleuca forests (around 9° 29' 00" N; 105° 20'
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. Ill
Asiatic Herpeto/ogical Research
2004
Map scale: 1:15,000,000
Figure 1. Topographic map of Vietnam.
00" E;) situated at the southern tip of Vietnam. It is pos-
sible that Le and Broad misidentified this species in their
survey (Jenkins, 1995). However, Peter Paul van Dijk,
Le Trong Dat, and Douglas Hendrie on May 30, 2000
found this species in Ben Chuong Duong Street shops in
Ho Chi Minh City (Hendrie, 2000a). This evidence com-
bined with the one-way trafficking of turtles (from south
to north) (Le and Broad, 1995) indicates that M. anna-
mensis may have much wider distribution than previous-
ly thought.
This hypothesis is also supported by Le and Trinh
(2001). Their interviews with local dealers, in May
2001, in Quang Nam Province revealed that one dealer
in Thang Binh District bought this species from the ship-
ments transported from the south. Le and Trinh (2001)
also suggested that A/, annamensis is naturally distrib-
uted in Tra My, Tien Phuoc, and probably Hiep Due
Districts, Quang Nam Province. These authors also indi-
cated an interesting fact that turtle hunters only sell their
animals to the local dealers. This manner of trade
demonstrates that the local trade data can be informative
in determining the limit of the natural ranges of some
species.
It is noted that we did not encounter any M. mutica
in the areas in Quy Nhon and Da Nang. Le and Trinh
(2001) also did not find any M. mutica in their trade
investigation, which covered seven districts and one
town in Quang Nam Province, and the city of Da Nang.
According the pattern of turtle trade in Vietnam plotted
by Le and Broad (1995), turtles have been collected
from the south and transported to the north. They are
finally destined in the border between and Vietnam and
China, where they are traded in an enormous volume.
The one-way south north trafficking leads to the conclu-
sion that M. mutica does not occur in Da Nang, located
in the southern side of Hai Van Pass, or southern areas
of the city.
In the survey, we found no evidence for M. anna-
mensis distributed in the northern side of the Hai Van
Pass. Interviews with turtle dealers from two collecting
points in the city of Hue (north of Hai Van Pass)
revealed that this species was only transported to the city'
from the south and there was no record of this species in
the surrounding areas. It is also interesting that the deal-
ers called this species Rua Dep Nam (Beautiful Southern
Turtle) as compared to Rua Dep Bac (Beautiful Northern
Turtle), here referred to Mauremys mutica. According to
them, M. mutica came only from areas north of Hai Van
Pass. In the house of a trader in Hue, we observed about
20 M. mutica from 1 to 2 kg, but no M. annmensis. In the
other site, we did not find any M. mutica or M anna-
mensis.
Given the fact that Hue and Da Nang is only 100 km
apart, it is very likely that Hai Van Pass (at around 16°N)
forms the natural boundary of these two species since
the Pass stands in between two cities. Records from pre-
vious studies also support this hypothesis (Iverson.
1992; Nguyen and Ho, 1996). Thus, the mountain range,
which cuts through the country, is most certainly the
northern boundary of M. annamensis' range and south-
ern boundary of M. mutica's range. Because they are the
lowland inhabitants, the Pass (1712m above sea level at
the summit) seems to be a significant barrier.
Some studies have suggested that the Pass is the
border between two zoological regions. Northern
Central Vietnam (Northern Truong Son) and Central
Vietnam (Central Truong Son) for such groups as rodent,
bird, fish, and lizard (Bobrov, 1993; Dao, 1978. Cao,
1989). In addition, Fooden (1996) showed in Figli that
the distribution two closely related gibbon taxa,
Hylobates gabriellae siki and H. gabriellae gabriellae ,
has been separated by the Pass. Even though primate is
more likely to possess higher dispersal ability, the barri-
er seems significant enough to block their expansion. In
2004
Asiatic Herpeto/ogical Research
Vol. 10, p. M2
fact, the Truong Son Mountain Range in general has
established dispersal barriers for Cuora galbinifrons
species complex (Stuart and Parham, 2004).
Hai Van Pass is a part of Truong Son Mountain
Range (Annamite Mountains), which runs throughout
most of the country’s length. The Pass meets the South
China Sea and effectively divides the country into two
different sections. It is formed by aluminous granite, and
probably emerged about 250 Mya in the early Triassic
(Lepvrier et al., 1997). If the Pass is actually the natu-
ral boundary of these two species’ ranges, it can be
hypothesized that the speciation between M annamensis
and M mutica was occurred when their ancestors dis-
persed across the Hai Van Pass and then were subse-
quently isolated. Since these turtles are good swimmers,
one possible scenario is that they rafted on the sea to get
to the other side of the Pass. Another possibility is that
they traveled south through a narrow land belt exposed
during the low sea level period. According to Prentice
and Denton (1988), before from 6 Mya to 0.9 Mya the
sea level fluctuated at an average of 70m below the pres-
ent sea level. At this level, a few kilometers of the con-
tinental shelf could be opened to the east of the Pass
(Voris, 2000) and well served as a travel route for these
turtles. However, these hypotheses are very preliminary
and, therefore, should be carefully tested in a much more
comprehensive study in the future.
Trend in the trade of M. annamensis. - In recent years,
turtles in the Southeast Asian region, especially in
Vietnam, have been critically threatened by the trade
with China. The trade has been driven by the Chinese
long tradition of using turtles as food and medicines.
Many species might go extinct in very near future unless
urgent protection measures are implemented (van Dijk,
2000; Hendrie, 2000). In Vietnam, species such as
Cuora trifasciata , believed to be able to cure cancer, is
at considerable risk due to its significant economic value
(about 1 000 USD per individual or even more (Lovich et
al ., 2000; Le and Trinh, 2001)). For M. annamensis , in
addition to the general demand from China, there are
also interests in keeping them as pets in countries such
as the U.S. The United States Fish and Wildlife Service
indicated that from 1996 to 1999 small numbers were
imported to the U.S. from Vietnam (Consideration of
Proposals for Amendment of Appendices I and II).
Weissgold (2002) even maintained that the imports
increased during 1999-2001. Due to the risk posed by
the trade and habitat destruction, this species has been
listed in the Appendix II and in the critically endangered
category by CITES and IUCN, respectively.
It is clear that the number of M. annamensis has
declined dramatically in recent years. The market value
of this species, approximately $5 to $7 per kg (Le and
Broad, 1995; Le and Trinh, 2001; and this survey), can
generate substantial interests among poor local people.
In our survey in 1996, this species was still pretty com-
mon in the trade. My personal observation in Dong
Xuan market, Hanoi, in 1998 also confirmed the com-
monness of this species. More recently, Hendrie (2000b)
reported that the occurrence of this species in turtle con-
fiscated shipments is less frequent compared to the pre-
vious years. Le and Trinh (2001) reported that this
species was very rare in the trade compared to other
species — only second to Golden Turtle ( Cuora trifasci-
ata). In fact, they only encountered only one juvenile in
the whole period of the survey. Thus, this species should
be given the highest priority in conservation programs in
the near future.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Drs. Ross Kiester and James
Juvik for their support of the field trip. Bryan Stuart
encouraged and convinced ML that the information in
this paper is important. Comments from two anonymous
reviewers and Jim Parham help improve the paper. ML
is supported by a NASA grant (No. NAG5-8543) to the
Center for Biodiversityand Conservation at the
American Museum of Natural History and a Columbia
University/CERC Faculty Fellowship.
Literature Cited
Bourret, R. 1941. Les tortues de l’lndochine. Bulletin de
Flnstitut Oceanographique de FIndochine 38:1-235
Bobrov V. V. 1993. Zoogeographic analysis of the lizard
fauna (Reptilia, Sauria) of Vietnam.
Zoologicheskii-Zhumal 72(8): 70-79 (in Russian,
English summary)
Cao, V. S. 1989. On the problem of zoogeographical
division of the rodent fauna of Vietnam (Mammalia,
Rodentia). Vertebrata-Hungarica 23:57-66
Consideration of Proposals for Amendment of
Appendices I and II. WWW at
http://www.cites.org/eng/cop/12/prop/E12-P21.pdf
Dao, V.T. 1978. An experience of zoogeographical
regionalization of Vietnam. Zoologicheskii-Zhurnal
57:582-586 (in Russian, English summary)
Ernst, C. H. and R. W. Barbour. 1989. Turtles of the
World. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington
D.C. and London. 313 pp.
Vol. 10, p. 113
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Fooden, J. 1996. Zoogeography of Vietnamese primates.
International Journal of Primatology 17(5): 845-
899
Hendrie, D. B. 2000a. Compiled notes on the wildlife
trade in Vietnam - January-May 30, 2000. Report to
TRAFFIC Southeast Asia.
Hendrie, D. B. 2000b. Status and conservation of tortoi-
ses and freshwater turtles in Vietnam. Pp. 63-73. In
P. P. van Dijk, B. L. Stuart, and A. G. J. Rhodin
(eds.), Asian Turtle Trade: Proceedings of A
Workshop on Conservation and Trade of Freshwater
Turtles and Tortoises in Asia. Chelonian Research
Monographs, Number 2.
Iverson, J. B. 1992. A revised checklist with distribution
maps of the turtles of the world. Privately pub-
lished. 374 pp.
Iverson, J. B., A. J. Kimerling, A. R. Kiester., L. E.
Hughes, and J. Nicolello. 1999. World turtle databa-
se. Website at http://emys.geo.orst.edu
Le, D. D. and S. Broad. 1995. Investigations into
Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Trade in Vietnam.
IUCN Species Survival Commission, IUCN, Gland,
Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. 34pp.
Le, T. D. and N. L. Trinh. 200 1 . Status of the Vietnamese
turtle ( Mauremys annamensis Siebenrock, 1903) in
the wild and in the trade in Quang Nam and Da
Nang. Cue Phuong Conservation Project.
(Unpublished Report).
Lepvrier, C., H. Maluski, V. V. Nguyen, D. Roques, V.
Axente, and C. Rangin. 1997. Indosinian NW-
trending shear zones within Truong Son belt
(Vietnam): 40Ar-39Ar Triassic ages and Cretaceous
to Cenozoic overprints. Tectonophysics 283:105-
127.
Lovich, J. E., R. A. Mittermeier, P. C. H. Pritchard, A. G.
J. Rhodin, and J. W. Gibbons. 2000. Powdermill
conference: Trouble for the world’s turtles. Turtle
and Tortoise Newsletter 1:16-17
Nguyen, V. S. and C. T. Ho. 1996. [Checklist of
Herpetofauna of Vietnam]. Scientific and Technical
Publishing House, Hanoi. 264pp. (In Vietnamese).
Prentice, M. L. and G. H. Denton. 1988. Deep-sea oxy-
gen isotope record, the global ice sheet system, and
hominid evolution. Pp 383-403. In F. Grine (ed),
The Evolutionary History of the Robust
Australopithecines. De Gruyter, New York.
Stuart, B. L. and J. F. Parham. 2004. Molecular phyloge-
ny of the critically endangered Indochinese box tur-
tle ( Cuora galbinifrons). Molecular Phylogenetics
and Evolution 31:164-177.
Siebenrock, F. 1903. Schildkroten des ostlichen
Hinterindien. Anzeiger der Kaiserlichen Akademie
der Wissenschaften in Wien 1 12(1 ):333-353 .
Van Dijk, P. P. 2000. The status of turtles in Asia. Pp. 1 5-
23. In P. P. van Dijk, B. L. Stuart, and A. G. J.
Rhodin (eds.), Asian Turtle Trade: Proceedings of A
Workshop on Conservation and Trade of Freshwater
Turtles and Tortoises in Asia. Chelonian Research
Monographs, Number 2.
Voris, H. K. 2000. Maps of Pleistocene sea levels in
Southeast Asia: shorelines, river systems and time
durations. Journal of Biogeography 27:1153-1167
Weissgold, B. J. 2002. Turtle trade in North America:
Legal requirements and trade trends. Report and
presentation presented at the technical workshop on
conservation and trade in freshwater turtles and tor-
toises in Asia, Running, Yunnan Province, China.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, pp. 1 14-1 1 9 1
Neotype of Testudo terrestris Forsskal, 1775 (Testudines, Testudinidae)
Jarmo PeralA1 and Roger Bour2
^ Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, PO Box 65 (Biocenter 3, Viikinkaari 1),
FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland; E-mail: jarmo.perala@helsinki.fi
^ Laboratoire des Reptiles et Amphibiens, Museum national d’Histoire naturelle,
25 rue Cuvier, 75005 Paris, France; E-mail: bour@mnhn.fr
Abstract. - We discuss and clarify the nomenclatural status of Testudo terrestris Forsskal, 1775. Testudo terrestris, a
taxon based on a syntype series, was until now a valid name for tortoises from parts of Egypt, Arabia and the Levant,
according to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. On the contrary, all type locality restrictions from
the 20th century regarding the name Testudo terrestris Forsskal, done without the fixation of a name-bearing specimen
(lectotype or neotype), are invalid. Because the name is valid, and because the syntypes, listed but not identified in
the original description, are untraceable, and to permanently fix the name and its type locality, we designate a neotype
for Testudo terrestris Forsskal based on a specimen from Aleppo, Syria.
Key words. - Taxonomy, Testudines, Testudinidae, Testudo terrestris Forsskal, 1775, nomenclatural validity, neotype.
Forsskal and Mediterranean tortoises. - During his
fatal travel (1761-1763) in the eastern Mediterranean
countries, the Finn Petter Forsskal (1732-1763) encoun-
tered tortoises, briefly described by the name Testudo
terrestris in his diary, which was published as a posthu-
mous work by Carsten Niebuhr (1733-1815), a German
traveller and surveyor, in 1775 [= Forsskal, 1775].
Strauch (1862: 69) remarks in a footnote that Forsskal
(1775) discusses a tortoise, Testudo terrestris, which
occurs in Aleppo and Lebanon, without describing it,
and Anderson (1896: 68) writes that “it is useless
attempting to identify this animal” “from Loheia, north
of Hodeida,” with reference to Forsskal (1775).
Forsskal ’s itinerary took him through the following
localities: Malta, Smyrna (Izmir), Constantinople, Alex-
andria, Rosetta, Cairo, Suez, Jedda, ending up in Yarim,
Arabia Felix (Yemen), where Forsskal died of malaria in
1763. Tortoises were reported from A1 Lufyayyah
(Yemen), Cairo (Egypt), Lebanon, Lattakia (A1 Ladhiq
-Tyah) and Aleppo (both in Syria) (Fig. 1). Forsskal
(1775) indicated that the chelonians are called “Zol-
hafae” by the Arabs (Forsskal, 1775); as for their distri-
bution, he specified: “Kahirae non frequens vivit,
Aleppo autem & ad Libanon copiosor,” translated by
Daudin (1801: 225) as: “It is rare in Cairo, but can be
found rather abundantly near Aleppo and towards
Mount Lebanon”. At best, Forsskal himself was thus
able to see tortoises in situ in northern Egypt (Nile Delta
and Suez area) only, that is those which are actually
called either Testudo kleinmanni Lortet, 1883 (the Egyp-
tian tortoise) or the vicariant T. werneri Perala, 2001.
This interpretation is in accordance with the vernacular
name of the Egyptian tortoise, Anderson (1898: 30;
“Sohlafa” pronounced “Zihlifa”) and Flower (1933:
742; “Educated people in Egypt employ the word ‘Zal-
heefah’”). Niebuhr’s subsequent route back home took
him via Basra, Baghdad, Mosul, Diyarbakir, Aleppo,
Lebanon and Palestine (Hansen, 1962; Niebuhr, 1772,
1973). Niebuhr, the only surviving member on the expe-
dition to Arabia Felix, continued to Bombay (Mumbai),
India, from where he shipped the natural history notes
(Niebuhr, 1772: xix) and specimens (Niebuhr, 1973:
120) collected by Forsskal via London to Copenhagen.
A considerable amount of material in the Forsskal col-
lection in Copenhagen was destroyed in bombings by
the British in 1807 (Nielsen, 1993). The type of T. ter-
restris is said to be "apparently lost" (Webb in Iverson,
1992). The name is not fixed to a single name-bearing
specimen.
Nomenclatural validity of Testudo terrestris. - Testudo
terrestris Forsskal, 1775, one of the oldest species group
names in the genus Testudo Linnaeus, 1758 sensu lato
(in the sense of Lapparent de Broin, 2001; Perala
2002a), is nomenclaturally valid, according to the
present International Code of Zoological Nomenclature
(ICZN, 1999): it was published before 1931 and thus
does not need to have a full diagnosis by which it can be
identified. Only “a description or a definition” per se is
needed (ICZN, 1999: Article 12). In this respect the
remark by Forsskal (1775) pertaining to the tortoises’
length (“...foot-long...”), as well as that made of the
shapes of plastra of both sexes, is enough, even if these
characters were incorrect. Moreover, although the name
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol.10, p. 1 15
Asiatic Herpeto/ogical Research
2004
Figure 1. Map of geographical localities mentioned in
Forsskal's (1775) description, which together constituted
the type locality of Testudo terrestris Forsskal until the
present work.
is accompanied by the remark “Obs.” (Forsskal, 1775:
12), it is also listed under the headings “Descripta” (p.
viii) as well as “Nominata” (p. ix) alongside with valid
names such as Testudo triunguis Forsskal, 1775, that is,
current Trionyx triunguis. The book contains a multitude
of other descriptions of valid taxa which cannot be
rejected based on the arguments (see below) about the
use of the Latin language, a contemporary standard,
alone. Based on Niebuhr’s subsequent route back home,
Gasperetti et al. (1993) suggested that it may actually be
Niebuhr who is responsible for the name T. terrestris
Forsskal. As Niebuhr’s role is not explicit in the original
publication, the authorship of the name remains with
Forsskal (ICZN, 1 999: Art. 50.1.1 ).
Testudo terrestris overlooked, rejected, then revali-
dated. - After its publication, and during about 180
years, the nominal species Testudo terrestris Forsskal,
1775, although nomenclaturally valid, was nevertheless
overlooked by most authors (except Strauch, 1 862 and
Anderson, 1896), some of them (Gray, 1831; Dumeril
and Bibron, 1835) only mentioning Testudo zolkafa and
Testudo zohalfa , respectively, based on Forsskal’s
(1775) vernacular Zolhafae, and which nornina nuda
appear in the above works as synonyms of Testudo
graeca Linnaeus, 1758 and Testudo mauritanica
Dumeril and Bibron, 1835, respectively. On the other
hand, at least one scientist worked to revive the nominal
species. A brief history of the case is presented by Bour
in David (1994: 86). The name Testudo terrestris
Forsskal was resurrected, and therefore revalidated, by
Wermuth (1956: 402), who improperly (without speci-
men fixation) designated “Arabia” as type locality.
Simultaneously, Wermuth considered to ask the Interna-
tional Commission on Zoological Nomenclature to
invalidate the nominal species Testudo terrestris
Forsskal; unfortunately, his attitude changed radically
(1958: 149-153) and he used this name to designate the
Near Eastern population of Testudo (as Testudo graeca
terrestris Forsskal), restricting the type locality to
“Libanon-Gebirge, Israel” [sic], and mistakenly extend-
ing its range to Libya. It must be outlined that there is a
gap in the range of Testudo graeca ( sensu lato) complex
tortoises between Israel and Libya, the latter containing
the range of the recently described species Testudo
cyrenaica Pieh & Perala, 2002. Wermuth had at his dis-
posal one Libyan specimen (SMF 36127; paratype of T.
cyrenaica ), from Dernah, which he thought to be identi-
cal with Middle-Eastern tortoises (Pieh & Perala, 2002).
Wermuth’s validation was disapproved by Buskirk (in
Ernst et al., 2000; unpublished manuscript from the
early 1990s; and pers. comm, to both authors); H igh-
field (in Ernst et al., 2000; and: http: //www.tor-
toisetrust.org/articles/newfloweri.html); J. F. Parham
(pers. comm.); and Perala (1996); among others. Their
opposition is based on several arguments such as: a
description is lacking with reference to the remark
“Obs.” in Forsskal (1775); the species cannot be identi-
fied from the “description”; there is no type specimen: a
“false” type locality; the name “ Testudo terrestris ” is
just Latin for a terrestrial chelonian, used without inten-
tion to describe a new species.
Need of a neotype. - Rather to resurrect Testudo terres-
tris Forsskal (Wermuth, 1956). it would have been pref-
erable: (1) either to suppress this imprecise name (and
which is a more recent homonym of the nominal species
Testudo terrestris Fermin, 1 765, for which Wermuth had
to successfully request the invalidation by the Interna-
tional Commission on Zoological Nomenclature; ICZN,
1963: Opinion 660); (2) either to use it to name Testudo
kleinmanni , a name revalidated only in the 1950s by
Mertens & Wermuth (1955), and independently by Lov-
eridge & Williams (1957). It could still be possible to
ask the ICZN to officially suppress the name Testudo
2004
Figure 2. Neotype of Testudo terrestris Forsskal, 1775, specimen n° NMW 18674: 2, sub-adult female. Upper left: lat-
eral view (right side); Upper right: dorsal view; Lower left: ventral view. Lower right: living specimen of Testudo terres-
tris, adult female, from Aleppo (topotype); CL = 185 mm, Ml = 143 mm, HE = 99 mm.
terrestris Forsskal, 1775. However, we reject this option
because: (1) the name is presently widely used (in all
recent check-lists, with more than fifty references),
although with vagueness about the identity of the con-
cerned population; (2) there is no valid name to desig-
nate the species of Testudo living in the Middle-East,
more precisely in the area of the upper Euphrates -
Tigris drainage; (3) the name Testudo terrestris
Forsskal, 1775 became available by the very ruling of
the International Commission on Zoological Nomencla-
ture (ICZN, 1963), and it is unlikely that the Commis-
sion would reverse its opinion. Accepting the
nomenclature proposed by Wemuith, one of us (RB)
proposed to emend the type locality of Testudo terrestris
Forsskal to the vicinity of Aleppo (= Halab), Syria
(Bour, 1989: 14), in the interest of clarifying the status
of this taxon and as a first step towards the description
of a neotype. However, such restriction of the type
locality, as well as the earlier restrictions proposed by
Wermuth (1956, 1958), are invalid according to the
Code (ICZN, 1999; Art. 76.3), because these actions
were not done in connection with the selection of a lec-
totype or neotype. Therefore we here propose the formal
description of a neotype of Testudo terrestris Forsskal,
1775. All the animals listed (although not identified;
therefore untraceable) by Forsskal (from Al-Luljayyah,
Cairo, Lebanon, Lattakia and Aleppo) actually represent
syntypes, according to the Code (ICZN, 1999; Art.
72. 1 . 1 ), and thus the type locality of T terrestris encom-
passes the region containing all those localities (ICZN,
1999; Art. 73.2.3). A neotype could legitimately be
selected from any of those per se. Besides sea turtles,
only Centrochelys sulcata (Miller, 1779), a land tortoise
(possibly introduced), and Pelomedusa subrufa
(Lacepede, 1788), a fresh-water turtle, are known to
occur in Yemen (Obst & Wranik, 1987; Gasperetti et al.,
1993; Al Safadi, 1997); therefore no Testudo sp. could
have been observed in Al-Luljayyah by the Forsskal -
Niebuhr expedition. Following the earlier choice, made
in accordance with the available data, and also with the
current taxonomical practice (e.g., Perala, 2002b). in
order to preserve the stability of the nomenclature, and
Vol.10, p. 117
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
to objectively delimit Testudo terrestris Forsskal from
all other species in the Testudo graeca ( sd .) complex,
we choose a specimen collected in Aleppo (and which
locality has by chance a historical background in tor-
toise literature: cf. Siebenrock, 1913).
The neotype of Testudo terrestris. - To fix the name and
type locality, we hereby designate a specimen from the
Vienna Natural History Museum No. NMW 18674:2,
collected in Aleppo by Viktor Pietschmann in March
1910, as the neotype of Testudo terrestris Forsskal,
1775, according to Articles 75 and 76 (ICZN, 1999).
The neotype is a subadult female with a straight-line
carapace length (CL) of 136.8 millimeters. Note: all
morphometric characters are according to the standards
published in Perala (2001). As a result of our neotype
designation (ICZN, 1999; Art. 76.3), the type locality of
Testudo terrestris Forsskal, 1775 is restricted to Aleppo
(Alep, Halab; 36°12’ N, 37°09’ E), Syria (Syrian Arab
Republic). (For the range of T. terrestris , see Perala,
2002b.)
Description. - Sub-adult female. Most scutes marked
with about a dozen of conspicuous growth ridges and
grooves; areolae of the carapace feebly bumped, neatly
displaced caudally, and also dorsally on the costals.
Longitudinal profile high, regularly domed, highest at
third vertebral, slightly behind the middle of the shell
(Fig. 2, top left). The outline of the shell short, squarish,
anterior and posterior free borders only very feebly cut
out. Vertebrals wide in dorsal view, the fourth the small-
est; the first one with almost straight lateral borders,
moderately wider anteriorly than posteriorly (Fig. 2, top
right). Cervical (= nuchal) four-sided, very wide; supra-
caudal distally as wide as vertebrals, regularly convex in
its middle; all common sutures of marginals nearly sub
equal (= height of lateral ones, and length of anterior
and posterior ones); only marginals 9-11 are slightly
flaring. Gulars well prominent but short and narrow,
their common suture very short; a pair of rather large
axillaries on each side; pectorals with a very short com-
mon (medial) suture, included about four times in the
medial suture of humerals; inguinals small, separated in
a larger distal part and a very small proximal part con-
tacting femorals; rear lobe of plastron hardly mobile,
short, anals both long and wide, with parallel anterior
and posterior borders: their particular shape at first sight
resembles the usual shape observed in males (Fig. 2,
bottom left). Head covered above with two large and
roughly pentagonal scutes, the frontal and the prefron-
tal, symmetrical about their common suture. Five nails
at each hand, the inner one smaller but well developed;
four at each foot. Anterior side of the fore-arm covered
between the elbow and the wrist by about fifteen large
scutes, the four largest being triangular, neatly distinct
from the background of the scaly skin; outer border of
this area covered by a row of six triangular, overlapping
scutes. Tail relatively long and regularly tapering, also
giving a rather masculine appearance, ending with
slightly enlarged but discrete flat scutes; a small isolated
spur on each thigh.
General color greenish yellow, often lighter close to
the sutures, with large darker, grayish areas apparently
deep in the scutes. Blackish marks reduced on the cara-
pace, limited to incomplete and irregular narrow lines
along the anterior sutures of the scutes (marginals, cos-
tals), also on the lateral borders of vertebrals; areolae or
areolar areas slightly and irregularly flecked with black,
on costals 1-3 and on vertebrals 1-3. Dark patches wider
on the plastron, issued from the areolae, roughly extend-
ing along the rear third of each scute (from pectorals to
anals), restricted to a narrow band on the humerals; lim-
its of the patches are inconspicuous, with a gradual
shading, delimiting few lighter or darker radiating lines.
Soft parts mostly yellowish, in places with a brownish
tinge, with well contrasting blackish flecks on the homy
beak (upper and lower, forming a ‘moustache’), on pre-
frontal, on the large triangular scutes of the fore-arms,
and on the heels; all nails are also heavily pigmented,
from dark brown to black.
Additional morphometric data derived from the
neotype are presented in the following (all measure-
ments in mm): maximum plastron length (PL) = 122.7,
midline plastron length (PL-m) = 1 1 1.8, maximum mid-
body width (MI) = 100.2, maximum width of shell at
posterior marginals (MA) - 104.4, maximum gular
scute length (GU-1) = 15.3, maximum gular scute width
(GU-w) = 27.3, gular scute height (GU-h) = 13.2, maxi-
mum shell height (HE) = 70.0, maximum width of ante-
rior shell opening (ASO-w) = 69.9, maximum height of
anterior shell opening (ASO-h) = 21.9, left minimum
bridge length (BR) = 59.9, maximum humeral scute
width (HUM-w) = 63.7, maximum pectoral scute width
(PEC-w) = 86.6, maximum abdominal scute width
(ABD-w) = 89.9, maximum femoral scute width (FEM-
w) = 64.1, maximum anal scute width (AN-w) = 51.9,
maximum nuchal scute length (NU-1) = 1 1.4, maximum
nuchal scute width (NU-w) = 10.0, intergular length
(GU-m) = 13.4, interhumeral length (HUM-m) = 22.8,
interpectoral length (PEC-m) = 7.7, interabdominal
length (ABD-m) = 42.1, interfemoral length (FEM-m) =
10.8, interanal length (AN-m) = 18.7, maximum width
of first vertebral scute (Vl-w) = 35.2, maximum width
of second vertebral scute (V2-w) = 36.4, maximum
width of third vertebral scute (V3-w) = 41.0, maximum
width of fourth vertebral scute (V4-w) = 33.8, maxi-
mum width of fifth vertebral scute (V5-w) = 41.3, maxi-
mum length of first vertebral scute (V 1 -1) = 26.9,
2004
maximum length of second vertebral scute (V2-1) =
28.0, maximum length of third vertebral scute (V3-1) =
25.6, maximum length of fourth vertebral scute (V4-1) =
23.3, maximum length of fifth vertebral scute (V5-1) =
3 1 .8, first costal length (C 1) = 43.0, second costal length
(C2) = 28.7, third costal length (C3) = 28.1, fourth cos-
tal length (C4) = 22.9, maximum dorsal width of supra-
caudal (SUP-d) = 23.4, maximum ventral width of
supracaudal (SUP-v) = 40.4, maximum median length
of supracaudal (SUP-1) = 21.7, maximum head width
(HEAD) = 21.6, minimum distance between right eye
and tympanum (EYE-TY) = 6.9, minimum distance
between right eye and nostril (EYE-NO) = 6.5.
Figure 2 (lower right) depicts a living female (topo-
type) Testudo terrestris Forsskal from the type locality,
Aleppo, Syria.
Acknowledgments
We warmly thank James Buskirk (Oakland, CA) and
James Parham (University of California, Berkeley) for
personal communications, as well as two anonymous
reviewers for comments, which had a positive impact on
the manuscript, Richard Gemel, Heinz Grillitsch and
Franz Tiedemann (all from the Naturhistorisches
Museum, Vienna) for the loan of specimens, the Aca-
demic Kippis Society (AKS) for spiritual guidance, and
Annemarie Ohler (Museum national d’Histoire
naturelle, Paris) for logistical help.
Literature Cited
A1 Safadi, M. M. 1997. Yemeni Turtles & Tortoises.
Yemen Times, vol.VII, 51 (last page), and http://
www.yementimes.com/97/iss51/lastpage.htm.
Anderson, J. 1896. Sketch of the literature bearing on
the reptilian and batrachian fauna of Arabia. Part
IV. Pp. 68-76. In A Contribution to the Herpetology
of Arabia with a Preliminary List of the Reptiles
and Batrachians of Egypt. R. H. Porter, London.
Anderson, J. 1898. Zoology of Egypt. I. Reptilia and
Batrachia. Bernard Quaritch, London. Reprinted as
fac simile in 1965 (Wheldon & Wesley and J.
Cramer, Codicote and Weinheim). i-lxv, 371 pp., pi.
1-7 + pi. 1-50.
Bour, R. 1989. Caracteres diagnostiques offerts par le
crane des tortues terrestres du genre Testudo.
Mesogee 48 (1988): 13-19.
David, P. 1994. Liste des reptiles actuels du monde. I.
Chelonii. Dumerilia 1:1-127.
Dumeril, A. M. C. and G. Bibron. 1835. Erpetologie
generale ou histoire naturelle complete des reptiles.
Tome 2. Librairie Encyclopedique de Roret, Paris,
i-ii, 680 pp.
Ernst, C. H., R. G. M. Altenburg and R. W. Barbour
2000. Turtles of the World: World Biodiversity
Database CD-ROM Series. Expert Center for Taxo-
nomic Identification, University of Amsterdam &
UNESCO-Publishing, Paris.
Flower, S. S. 1933. Notes on the recent reptiles and
amphibians of Egypt, with a list of the species
recorded from that Kingdom. Proceedings of the
Zoological Society, London 1933:734-851.
Forskal [sic], P. 1775. Descriptiones Animalium,
Avium, Amphibiorum, Piscium, Insectorum, Ver-
mium; quae in itinere orientali observavit Petrus
Forskal Prof. Haun. Post mortem auctoris edidit
Carsten Niebuhr. Heineck & Faber, Hauniae
(Copenhagen), xxxiv, 164 pp.
Gasperetti, J., A. E. Stimson, J. D. Miller, J. P., Ross and
P. R. Gasperetti. 1993. Turtles of Arabia. Fauna of
Saudi Arabia, Riyadh, 13:170-367.
Gray, J. E. 1831. Synopsis Reptilium; or short descrip-
tions of the species of Reptiles. Part I. - Cataphra-
cta. Tortoises, Crocodiles, and Enaliosaurians.
Treuttel, Wurtz, and Co., London, i-vii, 85 pp., pi.
1-7.
Hansen, T. 1962. Det Lyckelige Arabien. En Dansk
Expedition 1761-1767. Nordisk Forlag, Kobenhavn
(Copenhagen). 376 pp.
ICZN. 1963. Opinion 660. Suppression under the ple-
nary powers of seven specific names of turtles
(Reptilia: Testudines). Bulletin of Zoological
Nomenclature 20:187-190.
ICZN. 1999. International Code of Zoological Nomen-
clature. Fourth Edition adopted by the International
Union of Biological Sciences. ITZN, London, i-
xxix, 306 pp.
Iverson, J. B. 1992. A Revised Checklist with Distribu-
tion Maps of the Turtles of the World. (Privately
published) Richmond, Indiana. 363 pp.
Vol.10, p. 119
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Lapparent de Broin, F. de, 2001. The European turtle
fauna from Triassic to the present. Dumerilia
4(3): 155-2 17.
Loveridge, A. and E. E. Williams. 1957. Revision of the
African tortoises and turtles of the suborder Crypto-
dira. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zool-
ogy at Harvard College 11 5(6): 160-557, 18 pi.
Mertens, R. and H. Wermuth. 1955. Die rezenten
Schildkroten, Krokodile und Bruckenechsen. Eine
kritische Liste der heute lebenden Arten und Ras-
sen. Zoologische Jahrbucher (Systematik) 83:323-
440.
Niebuhr, C. 1772. Beschreibung von Arabien Aus
eigenen Beobachtungen und im Lande selbst gesa-
mmleten [sic] Nachrichten abgefasst von Carsten
Niebuhr. Nicolaus Moller, {Copenhagen (Copen-
hagen). i-xlvii, 3 unpaginated lists and 432 pp + 24
pi.
Niebuhr, C. 1973. Carsten Niebuhr. Entdeckungen im
Orient. Reise nach Arabien und anderen Landem
1761-1767 (Grim, R. & Grim, E., eds.). Horst Erd-
mann Verlag. 332 pp. [Niebuhr’s diaries in one vol-
ume. Originally: Carsten Niebuhrs Reisebesch-
reibung nach Arabien und anderen umliegenden
Landem. Erster, Zweiter & Dritter Band, 1774,
1778 & 1837. Nicolaus Moller, Copenhagen, origi-
nal publisher.]
Nielsen, J. G. 1993. Peter Forsskal - a pioneer in Red
Sea ichthyology. Israel Journal of Zoology 39:283-
286.
Obst, F. J. and W. Wranik. 1987. Contributions to the
herpetology of the People's Democratic Republic of
Yemen. I. The occurrence of Pelomedusa subrufa in
the southern Arab Peninsula (Reptilia, Testudines,
Pleurodira). Zoologische Abhandlungen, Staatli-
ches Museum fur Tierkunde Dresden 43(2): 15-20.
Perala, J. 1996. [Tortoises in southern Turkey]. In Her-
petokongressi 1 - The Official Congress Publication
(M. Kanza, J. Perala & J. Vikberg, eds): 14-26. The
Herpetological Society of Finland, Helsinki. (In
Finnish).
Perala, J. 2001. A new species of Testudo (Testudines:
Testudinidae) from the Middle East, with implica-
tions for conservation. Journal of Herpetology
35(4):567-582.
Perala, J. 2002a. The genus Testudo (Testudines: Testu-
dinidae): Phylogenetic inferences. Chelonii 3:32-
39.
Perala, J. 2002b. Morphological variation among Mid-
dle Eastern Testudo graeca L., 1758 ( sensu lato)
with a focus on taxonomy. Chelonii 3:78-108.
Pieh, A. and J. Perala. 2002. Variabilitat von Testudo
graeca Linnaeus, 1758 im ostlichen Nordafrika mit
Beschreibung eines neuen Taxons von der
Cyrenaika (Nordostlibyen). Herpetozoa 15 (l/2):3-
28.
Siebenrock, F. 1913. Schildkroten aus Syrien und Meso-
potamien. Annalen des k. k. Naturhistorischen Hof-
museums 27:171-225.
Strauch, A. 1862. Chelonologische Studien mit beson-
derer Beziehung auf die Schildkrotensammlung der
kaiserlichen Akademie fur Wissenschaften zu St.
Petersburg. Memoires de l'Academie imperiale des
Sciences de Saint-Petersbourg (VII)5(7): 1-196.
Wermuth, H. 1956. Versuch der Deutung einiger bisher
iibersehenen Schildkroten-Namen. Zoologische
Beitrage 2:399-423.
Wermuth, H. 1958. Status und Nomenklatur der Mau-
rischen Landschildkrote, Testudo graeca , in SW-
Asien and NO-Afrika. Senckenbergiana biologica
39(3/4): 149-153.
2004 Asiatic Herpetological Research . Vol. 10, PP- 120-125
An Ocadia sinensis x Cyclemys shanensis hybrid
(Testudines: Geoemydidae)
Maik Schilde1, Dana Barth2 and Uwe Fritz3
1 Opalstr. 31, D-043 19 Leipzig, Germany; E-mail: maik.schilde@ufz.de
-University of Leipzig, Institute of Zoology, Molecular Evolution & Animal Systematics,
Talstr. 33, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany; E-mail: dbarth@rz.uni-leipzig.de
3 Zoological Museum (Museum fur Tierkunde), Natural History State Collections Dresden, A. B. Meyer Building,
Konigsbriicker Landstr. 159, D-0 11 09 Dresden, Germany; E-mail: uwe.fritz@snsd.smwk.sachsen.de
Abstract. - A captive bred Ocadia sinensis x Cyclemys shanensis hybrid is described. Its hybrid status was confirmed
by a comparison of a 1036 bp fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene with the putative mother (C. shanen-
sis) and genomic ISSR fingerprinting. This is the first report of an intergeneric hybrid between very distantly related
geoemydid turtles. All previous geoemydid intergeneric hybrids have been crossings within or between two sister
clades containing the currently accepted genera ( Chinemys , Mauremys, Ocadia ) and ( Cuora , Pyxidea).
Key words. - Cyclemys, Ocadia, testudines, intergeneric hybrid.
Introduction
Recently several new cases of intergeneric chelonian
hybrids became known to science (reviewed in Galgon
and Fritz, 2002). Most of them belong to the Southeast
Asian family Geoemydidae, long known under its junior
synonym Bataguridae. However, current research on the
molecular phylogeny of geoemydids has shown that
some species traditionally attributed to different genera
are more closely related than previously thought (Wu et
al., 1999; McCord et ah, 2000; Honda et ah, 2002a, b;
Barth et ah, in press; Stuart and Parham, in press), sug-
gesting that they should be better lumped in the same
genus. Thus, some of the hybrids may be in fact not
intergeneric. In this paper we report a captive bred
hybrid between two distantly related Southeast Asian
geoemydids, representing an undoubtedly intergeneric
cross.
According to the cited studies, there are several
major clades among geoemydids. One clade contains the
currently recognized genera Chinemys, Mauremys,
Ocadia, Cuora, and Pyxidea (McCord et ah, 2000;
Honda et ah, 2002a, b; Barth et ah, in press), and anoth-
er one, being the sister clade, Cyclemys, Sacalia,
Heosemys, Hieremys, Notochelys, and Leucocephalon
(McCord et ah, 2000; Honda et ah, 2002b).
The turtle described herein is the result of a
hybridization of an Ocadia sinensis male and a
Cyclemys shanensis female, representatives of two of
the major clades of the Geoemydidae. This hybrid
demonstrates that very distantly related geoemydids are
capable of hybridizing successfully. It underlines the
possibility that some recently described Southeast Asian
chelonians ( Ocadia glyphistoma, O. philippeni ), which
are only known from few pet trade specimens, might
also be hybrids.
The specimen. - The turtle described below hatched in
the live collection of M. Schilde from an egg of a
Cyclemys shanensis, laid August 13, 2002. The second
egg of the same clutch did not develop. The mother was
a long term captive, and kept with a Cyclemys shanensis
male and two Ocadia sinensis males. The elongated
eggs measured 56.5 x 20.0 mm. One quickly developed
a white band as typical for fertile eggs. It was incubated
constantly at 28°C on Vermiculite. On October 26, 2002
a healthy turtle with a straight line shell length of 33 mm
hatched (Figs. 1-4). Its color pattern resembled Ocadia
sinensis but the general form was more similar to
Cyclemys (roofed, distinctly tricarinate shell, serrated
posterior marginal scutes), suggesting that it might be a
hybrid. We decided to use two molecular methods to test
this hypothesis.
Materials and Methods
We sequenced a 1036 bp portion of the mitochondrial
cytochrome b gene (cyt b) of the captive bred turtle for
comparison with the putative mother. Because mito-
chondrial DNA is inherited in the maternal line, the
sequence of the putative hybrid should be identical with
the mother ( Cyclemys shanensis ). Species identification
of the Cyclemys was done by morphological means and
comparison with the mitochondrial cyt b sequences of
Guicking et al. (2002); the Ocadia sinensis males were
determined morphologically.
Blood samples were obtained by coccygeal vein
puncture. Samples were stored as described in Haskell
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 121
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Figure 1 .
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Fig. 1-4. The captive bred Ocadia sinensis x Cyclemys shanensis hybrid, September 2003 (11 months old). The roofed,
distinctly tricarinate shell and the serrated posterior marginals resemble Cyclemys spp. The neck and facial stripes as
well as the plastral pattern are similar to O. sinensis. The plastral pattern was more contrasting as a hatchling and has
faded during growth. Photos: F. Hohler.
and Pokras (1994) and Arctander (1988). Additional
blood samples and photographs (dorsal and ventral
aspects) of the captive bred turtle (MTD T1262), the
Cyclemys shanensis female (MTD T816), and the two
Ocadia sinensis males (MTD T8 1 7-8 1 8) are in the tissue
collection of the Zoological Museum Dresden. DNA
extraction was carried out using the QIAamp Blood
Mini Kit (Qiagen). Primers mt-A (Lenk and Wink, 1997)
and HI 5909 (Lenk et al., 1999) were used to amplify a
DNA fragment containing 1036 bp of cyt b. PCR and
sequencing conditions were as described in Barth et al.
(in press). Sequencing reactions were performed on an
ABI 3100 Genetic Analyzer. Alignment was carried out
with CLUSTAL X, v. 1.8 (Thompson et ah, 1997) with
default parameters. To demonstrate the considerable
genetic difference between Cyclemys and Ocadia com-
pared to other hybridizing geoemydids, Mega 2.1
(Kumar et ah, 2001) was used for estimation of genetic
distances. Cyt b sequence data for calculating genetic
distances are from Barth et ah (in press) and Guicking et
ah (2002).
To exclude the possibility of a gynogenetic or
parthenogenetic origin of the specimen and to identify
the putative father, we conducted genomic fingerprint-
ing with Inter Simple Sequence Repeats (1SSR) for the
captive bred specimen, the Cyclemys female and both
Ocadia males. ISSR PCR produces species-specific
genomic fingerprints (Gupta et ah, 1994; Zietkiewics et
ah, 1994; Wink et ah, 1998. 2001; Nagy et ah, 2003)
useful in detecting turtle hybrids (Wink et ah, 2001).
Hybrid specimens share about 50% of their ISSR PCR
products with the respective paternal and maternal
species (Wolfe et ah, 1998: Wink et ah, 2001; Storch et
ah, 2001 ). ISSR PCR is a simple and cheap method, and
the results are easily reproducible (Bornet and
Branchard, 2001). Gynogenesis or pseudogamy, the
development of unfertilized eggs by activation through
sperm of another species, as well as parthenogenesis is
not known in turtles. However, if the captive bred spec-
imen should be of such origin, the ISSR profiles should
be identical with its biological mother.
The primer 5 -GACAGACAGACAGACA-3' was
used to generate ISSR fingerprints for the captive bred
specimen, the putative mother ( Cyclemys shanensis ),
and both Ocadia sinensis males. Each reaction mix con-
tained 100 ng of genomic DNA, 20 pmol primer, 1 U
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 122
Table 1. ISSR fingerprints of the Ocadia sinensis x Cyclemys shanensis hybrid and parental species (bioogica
mother and father plus the second 0. sinensis male kept with the mother). Only polymorphic and diagnostic
products shown.
MTD T = Museum fur Tierkunde Dresden Tissue Collection; + = PCR product present, - = PCR product lacking.
Taq-polymerase (SIGMA), 2.5 pi lOx PCR buffer
(SIGMA) and 2.5 pi of 200 pM dNTPs in a total volume
of 25 pi. Amplification conditions were 4 min initial
denaturation (94°C), followed by 31 cycles of 1 min at
94°C, 1 min at 54°C, and 2 min at 72°C, final extension
of 7 min (72°C). PCR reactions were performed on an
Eppendorf thermocycler.
15 pi of each PCR reaction was separated on 2%
agarose gels (25 cm), stained in ethidium bromide solu-
tion (0.5 pg/ml) and visualized under UV light. The 100
bp DNA ladder Plus (MBI Fermentas) was used as a size
standard. PCR was repeated under identical conditions
to test reproducibility of results. DNA fragments were
scored manually. Band sharing coefficients were calcu-
lated according to Storch et al. (2001).
Results and Discussion
As expected, the cyt b sequence of the captive bred tur-
tle and the putative mother ( Cyclemys shanensis ; EMBL
acc. no. AJ604513) proved to be identical. ISSR finger-
printing produced highly variable profiles which were
species-specific and permitted individual identification
of both Ocadia sinensis males (Table 1). The captive
bred turtle shared 6 of its 13 bands with the mother
(band sharing coefficient 0.5) and 7 bands with one of
the O. sinensis males (band sharing coefficient 0.52).
Because the captive bred turtle and this O. sinensis male
exclusively share some fragments, we identified this tur-
tle as the biological father. Thus, both methods con-
firmed the hybrid origin of the captive bred turtle.
Except for an unconfirmed, anecdotal newspaper
record of natural hybrids between Cuora flavomargina-
ta and Geoemyda japonica in Japan (Anonymous,
1995), all previous geoemydid intergeneric hybrids have
been crossings within or between two sister clades con-
taining the currently accepted genera ( Chinemys ,
Mauremys, Ocadia) and {Cuora, Pyxidea ); Chinemys
reevesii x Cuora amboinensis kamaroma (Galgon and
Fritz, 2002), Chinemys reevesii x Mauremys japonica
(Yasukawa et al., 1992), Chinemys reevesii x Mauremys
mutica (= "Mauremys pritchardi" , Wink et al., 2001),
Cuora amboinensis kamaroma x Mauremys annamensis
(Fritz and Mendau, 2002), Cuora bourreti x Pyxidea
mouhotii (= "Cuora serrata ", Parham et al., 200 1 ; Stuart
and Parham, in press), Cuora galbinifrons x Pyxidea
mouhotii (= "Cuora serrata ", Parham et al., 2001; Stuart
and Parham, in press), and Cuora trifasciata x
Mauremys mutica (= " Mauremys iversoni", Parham et
al., 2001 ; Wink et al., 200 1 ). Cyclemys belongs to anoth-
er major clade, comprising the genera Cyclemys ,
Sacalia , Heosemys, Hieremys , Notochelys , and
Leucocephalon (McCord et al., 2000). Cyclemys is sep-
arated by a considerable genetic distance from Ocadia
(Table 2), surpassing the genetic distances of the other
hybridizing geoemydids.
Superficially our hybrid Ocadia sinensis x
Cyclemys shanensis resembles O. sinensis due to its
striped head and neck and the spotted plastral pattern.
This leads to the speculation that the morphologically
similar Ocadia philippeni McCord and Iverson, 1992
and O. glyphistoma McCord and Iverson, 1994 might be
also intergeneric hybrids, as earlier suggested by van
Dijk (2000), Fau and Shi (2000), Parham and Shi
(2001), and Galgon and Fritz (2002). Both species were
described on the basis of only a few pet trade turtles
(McCord and Iverson, 1992, 1994), and until now no
Vol. 10, p. 123
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Table 2. Pairwise genetic distances (cyt b) between
hybridizing geoemydid species.
Cyt b
Geomydid species pairwise
distances
Chinemys reevesii - Cuora amboinensis 0.104
Chinemys reevesii - Mauremys japonica 0.050
Chinemys reevesii - Mauremys m utica 0.070
Cuora amboinensis - Mauremys annamensis 0.098
Cuora galbinifrons - Pyxidea mouhotii 0.059
Cuora trifasciata - Mauremys mutica 0.104
Ocadia sinensis - Cyclemys shanensis 0.118
additional specimens became known to science. For
some individuals of three other pet trade taxa a hybrid
status has been unambiguously demonstrated: Two tur-
tles identified as Mauremys pritchardi McCord, 1997
proved to be hybrids of Chinemys reevesii and
Mauremys mutica (Wink et al., 2001). Three Mauremys
iversoni Pritchard and McCord, 1991 originated from
crossing Cuora trifasciata and Mauremys mutica
(Parham et al., 2001; Wink et al., 2001), and several
Cuora serrata Iverson and McCord, 1992, have been
demonstrated to be hybrids between Cuora galbinifrons
and Pyxidea mouhotii and of Cuora bourreti and
Pyxidea mouhotii (Parham et al., 2001; Stuart and
Parham, in press).
Until now it is unknown whether all specimens of
these taxa are of hybrid origin, and if so, whether the
crosses occurred in the wild, in captivity, or whether one
or the other form might represent a natural, stable hybrid
taxon (Parham et al., 2001; Wink et al., 2001). Many
Southeast Asian chelonians are facing extinction due to
overexploitation (van Dijk et al., 2000). Therefore,
many conservation efforts are established around the
globe, including CITES listing and captive breeding
programs for several species. A correct taxonomy is the
prerequisite for any conservation measure. Hence, it is
crucial to determine whether the mentioned taxa repre-
sent real evolutionary entities and deserve high priority
in conservation, this includes also natural hybrid taxa
(Allendorf et al., 2001), or whether they are only inci-
dentally occurring hybrids, without any conservation
relevance.
Acknowledgments
Special thanks go to Michael Wink and Daniela
Guicking, Heidelberg, for sharing unpublished geoemy-
did sequences with us and to Thomas U. Berendonk,
Leipzig, for technical advice. James R. Buskirk,
Oakland, provided the newspaper report on Cuora flavo-
marginata x Geoemyda japonica hybrids.
Literature Cited
Allendorf, F. W., R. F. Leary, P. Spruell and J. K.
Wenburg. 2001. The problems with hybrids: setting
conservation guidelines. TREE 16:613-622.
Anonymous. 1995. Hybrids between two protected tur-
tles increase. Okinawa Times 15 August 1995.
Arctander, P. 1988. Comparative studies of Avian DNA
by restriction fragment polymorphism analysis.
Journal of Ornithology 129:205-216.
Barth, D., D. Bernhard, G. Fritzsch and U. Fritz, in press.
The freshwater turtle genus Mauremys - a textbook
example of an east-west disjunction or a taxonomic
misconcept? Zoologica Scripta.
Bomet, B. and M. Branchard. 2001. Nonanchored inter
simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers: repro-
ducible and specific tools for genome fingerprint-
ing. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 19:209-215.
Fritz, U. and D. Mendau. 2002. Ein Gattungsbastard
zweier siidostasiatischer Schildkroten: Cuora
amboinensis kamaroma Rummler and Fritz, 1991 x
Mauremys annamensis (Siebenrock, 1903).
Salamandra 38:129-134.
Galgon, F. and U. Fritz. 2002. Captive bred hybrids
between Chinemys reevesii (Gray, 1831) and Cuora
amboinensis kamaroma Rummler and Fritz, 1991.
Herpetozoa 15:137-148.
Guicking, D., U. Fritz, M. Wink and E. Lehr. 2002. New
data on the diversity of the Southeast Asian leaf tur-
tle genus Cyclemys Bell, 1834. Molecular results.
Faunistische Abhandlungen, Museum fur Tierkunde
Dresden 23:75-86.
Gupta, M., Y.-S. Chyi, J. Romero-Severson and J. L.
Owen. 1994. Amplification of DNA markers from
evolutionary diverse genomes using single primers
of simple-sequence repeats. Theoretical Applied
Genetics 89:998-1006.
Haskell, A. and M. A. Pokras. 1994. Nonlethal blood
and muscle tissue collection from redbelly turtles
for genetic studies. Herpetological Review 25:11-
12.
Honda, M., Y. Yasukawa and H. Ota. 2002a. Phylogeny
of the Eurasian freshwater turtles of the genus
Mauremys Gray, 1869 (Testudines), with special
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 124
reference to a close affinity of Mauremys japonica
with Chinemys reevesii. Journal of Zoological
Systematics and Evolutionary Research 40:195-
200.
Honda, M., Y. Yasukawa, R. Hirayama and H. Ota.
2002b. Phylogenetic relationships of the Asian Box
turtles of the genus Cuora sensu lato (Reptilia:
Bataguridae) inferred from mitochondrial DNA
sequences. Zoological Science 19:1305-1312.
Kumar, S., K. Tamura, I. B. Jakobsen and M. Nei. 2001.
MEGA2: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics
Analysis Software. Bioinformatics 17:1244-1245.
Lau, M. and H. Shi. 2000. Conservation and trade of ter-
restrial and freshwater turtles and tortoises in the
People's Republic of China. Chelonian Research
Monographs 2:30-38.
Lenk, P, U. Fritz, U. Joger and M. Wink. 1999.
Mitochondrial phylogeography of the European
pond turtle, Emys orbicularis (Linnaeus 1758).
Molecular Ecology 8:1911-1922.
Lenk, P. and M. Wink. 1997. A RNA/RNA heteroduplex
cleavage analysis to detect rare mutations in popu-
lations. Molecular Ecology 6:687-690.
McCord, W. P, J. B. Iverson, P. Q. Spinks and H. B.
Shaffer. 2000. A new genus of geoemydid turtle
from Asia. Hamadryad 25:20-24.
McCord, W. P. and J. B. Iverson. 1992. A new species of
Ocadia (Testudines: Bataguridae) from Hainan
Island, China. Proceedings of the Biological
Society of Washington 105:13-18.
McCord, W. P. and J. B. Iverson. 1994. A new species of
Ocadia (Testudines: Batagurinae) from southwest-
ern China. Proceedings of the Biological Society of
Washington 107:52-59.
Nagy, Z. T., U. Joger, D. Guicking and M. Wink. 2003.
Phylogeography of the European whip snake
Coluber ( Hierophis ) viridiflavus as inferred from
nucleotide sequences of the mitochondrial
cytochrome b gene and ISSR genomic fingerprint-
ing. Biota 3:109-1 18.
Parham, J. F., W. B. Simison, K. H. Kozak, C. R.
Feldman and H. Shi. 2001. New Chinese turtles:
endangered or invalid? A reassessment of two
species using mitochondrial DNA, allozyme elec-
trophoresis and known-locality specimens. Animal
Conservation 4:357-367.
Parham, J. F. and H. Shi. 2001. The discovery of
Mauremys iversoni- like turtles at a turtle farm in
Hainan province, China: the counterfeit golden
coin. Asiatic Herpetological Research 9:71-76.
Storch, V., U. Welsch and M. Wink. 2001.
Evolutionsbiologie. Springer Verlag Berlin,
Heidelberg, New York, 450 pp.
Stuart, B. L and J. F. Parham, in press. Molecular phy-
togeny of the critically endangered Indochinese box
turtle ( Cuora galbinifrons). Molecular Phylogenet-
ics and Evolution.
Thompson, J. D., T. J. Gibson, F. Plewniak, F.
Jeanmougin and D. G. Higgins. 1997. The ClustalX
windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple
sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools.
Nucleic Acids Research 24:4876-4882.
van Dijk, P. P. 2000. The status of turtles in Asia.
Chelonian Research Monographs 2:15-23.
van Dijk, P. P, B. L. Stuart and A. G. J. Rhodin (eds.).
2000. Asian Turtle Trade. In Proceedings of a
Workshop on Conservation and Trade of Freshwater
Turtles and Tortoises in Asia. Chelonian Research
Monographs 2:1-164.
Wink, M., H. Sauer-Giirth, F. Martinez, G. Doval, G.
Blanco and O. Hatzofe. 1998. Use of GACA-PCR
for molecular sexing of Old World vultures (Aves:
Accipitridae). Molecular Ecology 7:779-782.
Wink, M., D. Guicking and U. Fritz. 2001. Molecular
evidence for hybrid origin of Mauremys iversoni
Pritchard et McCord, 1991, and Mauremys
pritchardi McCord, 1997. Zoologische
Abhandlungen, Staatliches Museum fur Tierkunde
Dresden 51:41-49.
Wolfe, A. D., Q.-Y. Xiang and S. R. Kephart. 1998.
Assessing hybridization in natural populations of
Penstemon (Scrophulariaceae) using hypervariable
intersimple sequence repeat (ISSR) bands.
Molecular Ecology 7:1107-1125.
Wu, P, K. Zhou and Q. Yang. 1999. Phylogeny of Asian
freshwater and terrestrial turtles based on sequence
analysis of 12S rRNA gene fragment. Acta
Zoologica Sinica 45:260-267.
Vol. 10, p. 125
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Yasukawa, Y., N. Kamezaki and N. Ichikawa. 1992. On
hybrids between Mauremys japonica and Chinemys
reevesii. Japanese Journal of Herpetology 14:206-
207.
Zietkiewicz, E., A. Rafalski and D. Labuda. 1994.
Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat
(ISSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction ampli-
fication. Genomics 20:176-183.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, pp. 126-128
New Data on the Trade and Captive Breeding of
Turtles in Guangxi Province, South China
Haitao Shi1, Zhiyong Fan2, Feng Yin3, and Zhigang Yuan4
' Department of Biology, Hainan Normal University, Haikou , 571158, Hainan Province, P. R. China.
E-mail:haitao-shi@263.net; Fax: 0898-65890520; Tel: 0898-66752479; 65883521.
-Fauna Division, The Endangered Species Import and Export Management Office of China (CNMA)
#18 Hepingli Dongjie, Beijing 100714, P. R. China.
J Department of Science and Education, China Wildlife Conservation Association, #18 Hepingli Dongjie,
Beijing 100714, P. R. China.
^Department of Biology, Guangxi Medicine University, 530021, Nanning, PR. China.
Abstract. - New data on the captive breeding and trade of turtles in Guangxi Province, China, are presented. These
data are from four turtle farms and three markets surveyed in May 2002. The scale of captive breeding in Guangxi
is larger than previously known. At the same time, the number of wild turtles in the markets may be decreasing.
Issues concerning the licensing of turtle farms and the effectiveness of enforcement are discussed.
Key words. - China, Guangxi, turtles, trade, farming.
Introduction
The People’s Republic of China is Asia’s most signif-
icant importer of tortoises and freshwater turtles and
more comprehensive studies on its wildlife trade are
urgently needed (Li and Li, 1997; van Dijk, et al., 2000).
There is a long history of wildlife consumption in
Guangxi, and traditional Chinese medicine is as popular
as in neighboring Guangdong Province. Li and Li( 1 997)
reported that there are at least 91 species of animals
involved in the wildlife trade in Guangxi, mostly turtles
and snakes. The sheer volume of the wildlife trade on
the border between China and Vietnam is astonishing,
and may be unprecedented in the history of internation-
al wildlife trade. Guangxi is one of the main corridor for
the import and export of wildlife from land and sea into
mainland China. Although China has recently increased
its level of protection for imported and exported turtles
(Meng et al., 2002), the effectiveness of these new meas-
ures is not well demonstrated. We report data on four
turtle farms and three markets surveyed in late May
2002.
Turtle farms
Shifu turtle farm (Shifu Town, Nanping City). - The
turtle farm was founded in 1996, its area is 65 ha. At it’s
height it included -70,000 turtles: -60,000 Trachemys
sripta elegans, -7,000 Pelodiscus sinensis , and -600
Ocadia sinensis. However during a very heavy flood on
July 5, 2001 in the area, almost all the turtles escaped or
drowned. The farm is rebuilding, but now includes only
-700 Mauremys mutica, -200 Palea steindachneri and
-50 Cuora trifaciata.
Quanming wildlife farm (Located at Quanming
Town, Daxin County). - The farm began to raise turtles
in 1996. It has -80 Mauremys mutica and 47 Chelydra
serpentina. Their 36 female Chelydra lay 30-35 eggs
three times every year. So they get more than 3000 eggs
every year. They are expanding to include Macroclemys
temminckii. Besides turtles, the wildlife farm also breed
successfully 1800 Tokay Geckos ( Gekko gecko ) and for
several decades has also bred the Masked Palm Civet
(Paguma larvata ).
Qingzhou turtle farm 1 (Qingzhou City). - This farm
has been raising turtles since 1981, but was not very suc-
cessful until 1997. In 2001, the farm had -1000
Mauremys mutica and -300 Cuora trifaciata. In the past
they also bred Trachemys scripta elegans , but switched
to Cuora trifaciata and Mauremys mutica due to the
higher price for the two species. The owner of this farm
claims that there are dozens more farms in Qingzhou
that were founded based stock from his farm. The phe-
nomena of Mauremys mutica mixed with Cuora trifaci-
ta was found here, mirroring the conditions of a farm in
Tunchang, Hainan Province (Shi & Parham, 2001). It
was impossible for us to visit the farm without the local
officials of Forestry Department forcing the farmer to
accept us. The owner prefers to remain secret in order to
avoid theft, taxes, and people wanting to borrow money.
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 127
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Qingzhou turtle farm 2 (Qingzhou city). - This farm
was founded in 1986. It encompasses 4 hectares, and
includes —7,000 Mauremys mutica , —6,000 Trachemys
scripte elegans , -2700 Pelodicus sinensis, -800 Cuora
trifaciata, 200 Cuora flavomarginata and 3 Pelochelys
bibroni. Approximately, 30,000 hatchlings are bred
every year. Unlike the owner of the previously reported
farm, the owner of this farm, Wusong Ma, is friendly,
generous, and open to visitors. Many famous people
have visited his turtle farm, including a former Chinese
national vice-premier, the Governor of Guangxi, and the
Minister of Agriculture Department. Unfortunately, all
this attention may have led to a large theft of Mauremys
mutica in April of 2001. According to the owner of the
farm, the value of these turtles was 50,000 USD. Despite
this, Mr. Ma remains non-secretive and has even set up
at least 20 additional farms.
Remarks on turtle farms. - The senior author (HS)
looked over the licenses for captive breeding of turtles at
the Forestry Department of Guangxi Province. More
than 600 farms (of various sizes, including small breed-
ing operations) were licensed in Guangxi Province. Zou
Yi, an official in the Guangxi Forestry Despartment,
informed us that another governmental department
(Agriculture Department) issues even more licenses for
turtle farming, but we do not have these numbers.
Moreover, most breeding operations are illegal and not
licensed. Consequently, determining the actual number
of commercial, often secretive, turtle breeders will
require intensive survey and investigation.
Turtle Markets
Nanning Road Trade Market in Nanning City. - Five
stalls with 14 species and 194 turtles were found in this
market. The species included 58 Pelodiscus sinensis, 24
Pyxidea mouhotii, 21 Platysternon megacephalum, 17
Mauremys mutica, 15 Trachmys script a elegans, 1 3
Cyclemys dent at a, 13 Palea steindachneri, 12 Sac alia
quadriocellata, 8 Indotestudo elongata, 4 Cuora
amboinensis, 4 Ocadia sinensis, 2 Heosemys grandis, 1
Hieremys annandalei, andl Orlitia borneensis.
Dongfeng Market in Qingzhou City. - Three stalls
with 9 species and 64 were found in Dongfeng Market
in Qingzhou. The species included 19 Trachmys scripta
elegans, 1 8 Indotestudo elongata, 9 Manouria impressa,
5 Malayemys subtrijuga, 4 Cuora amboinensis, 4
Pyxidea mouhotii, 2 Geoemyda spengleri, 2 Heosemys
grandis, and 1 Cuora galbinifrons.
Danqing Wholesale Market in Nanning City. - 5 stalls
with 4 species and 42 turtles were found in this market.
Sixty (71%) of the turtles were Platysternon mega-
cephalum. Platysternon was sold at every stall. I was
told that they came from turtle farms, but they refused to
tell where these turtle farms were.
Remarks on turtles. - According to Lu Qi, the vice
director of the Wildlife Management Section of the
Guangxi Forestry Department, the past three years have
seen a sharp decrease in the numbers of turtles in the
markets and he attributes this to increased enforcement.
This increased enforcement coincides with an ever-
growing commercial effort to breed these turtles. For
example, Manying Huang (professor of biology at
Guangxi Medicine University) states that there are over
3000 families that raise Cuora trifasciata in Nanning
City. However, the increased level of enforcement has
led to many captive-bred turtles also being confiscated.
If indiscriminant confiscations continue it could depress
the development of captive breeding of turtles in China.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Manying Huang, professor at
Guangxi Medicine University, Qi Lu, Zou Yi and others,
officials in Forestry Deaprtment of Guangxi Province,
for their assistance with the survey. This work was fund-
ed by National Natural Science Foundation of China
(No. 30260019), Foundation for University Key Teacher
by the Ministry of Education and Wildlife Conservation
Association of China. James Parham helped to correct
the English and provided helpful comments.
Literature Cited
Li, Y. and D. Li. 1997. The investigation on wildlife
trade across Guangxi borders between China and
Vietnam. Conserving China’s Biodiversity. Reports
of the Biodiversity Working group, China Council
for International Cooperation on Environment and
Development: 118-127.
Meng, X., Z. Zhou and B. L. Stuart. 2002. Recent
actions by the People’s Republic of China to better
control international trade of turtles. Turtle and
Tortoise Newsletter 5:15-16.
Shi, H. and J. F. Parham. 2001. Preliminary
Observations of a large turtle farm in Hainan
Province, People’s Republic of China. Turtle and
Tortoise Newsletter, issue 3: 4-6.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 128
van Dijk, P. P., B. L. Stuart and A. G. J. Rhodin (Eds.).
2000. Asian Turtle Trade: Proceedings of a
Workshop on Conservation and Trade of Freshwater
Turtles and Tortoises in Asia. Chelonian Research
Monographs 2:1-164.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, pp. 129-150
Recent Records of Turtles and Tortoises from
Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam
Bryan L. Stuart1’2’3’4’* and Steven G. Platt4’5
1 Field Museum of Natural History, Department of Zoology, Division of Amphibians & Reptiles,
1400 S. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605 USA. E-mail: bstuart@fieldmuseum.org
* Corresponding author and address
z University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Biological Sciences (M/C 066),
845 W. Taylor, Chicago, Illinois 60607 USA
3 Wildlife Conservation Society, P.O Box 6712, Vientiane, Lao PDR
4 Wildlife Conservation Society, P.O. Box 1620, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
5 Present address: Department of Math and Science, Oglala Lakota College,
P.O. Box 490, Kyle, South Dakota 57752-0490 USA
Abstract. - The chelonian fauna of Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam remains poorly known and is currently threatened
by widespread and intensive exploitation for food and traditional Chinese medicine. The distributions of many species
are uncertain owing to a paucity of records. Because turtles are so extensively traded in the region, most records now
come from animals in trade. We emphasize that authors must be explicit about how their records were obtained to
allow other workers the ability to critically evaluate the accuracy of the distribution record. We here present detailed
information on recent (1993-2002), vouchered records of 19 species of freshwater turtles, tortoises, and marine tur-
tles collected in the field or obtained from hunters, abandoned hunting camps, villages, or markets in Laos, Cambodia,
and Vietnam.
Key words. - Testudines, turtles, tortoises, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, distribution.
Introduction
Although mainland Southeast Asia has long been
regarded as a hotspot of chelonian diversity (van Dijk et
al., 2000), the turtle and tortoise fauna of Laos,
Cambodia, and Vietnam (formerly known as French
Indochina) remains poorly known. Biological investiga-
tion was limited prior to World War II, and since then
decades of civil unrest, political instability, and military
conflict have largely prevented fieldwork. Consequently
few museum records exist (summarized by Iverson,
1992) and with the exceptions of Smith (1931) and
Bourret (1941), little information is available on the
occurrence and distribution of chelonians in former
French Indochina. A recent photographic identification
guide to the region (Stuart et al., 2001) and country
reviews of Laos (Stuart and Timmins, 2000), Cambodia
(Touch et al., 2000), and Vietnam (Flendrie, 2000) sum-
marized information on chelonian distributions, but pro-
vided few details concerning new records on which
these accounts are based.
Exploitation of chelonians for food and medicinal
markets is widespread in Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam
(Jenkins, 1995; Le Dien Due and Broad, 1995, Lehr,
1997; Timmins and Khounboline, 1999; van Dijk et al.,
2000; Ziegler, 2002; Holloway 2003). Hunters in rural
villages capture turtles and tortoises for local consump-
tion or to sell to traders who periodically visit villages to
purchase wildlife. Although turtles and tortoises are
locally consumed and domestically traded in Laos,
Cambodia, and Vietnam, most are exported to markets
in southern China (Stuart et al., 2000; van Dijk et al.,
2000). Chelonians from Laos and Cambodia are usually
transported to Vietnam, where they join with
Vietnamese turtles on northward routes to China (Stuart
et al., 2000). Because Laos and Cambodia are source
rather than destination or transfer countries, specimens
obtained from markets in Laos or Cambodia usually
originated from that country. However, trade specimens
in Vietnam may have originated from Vietnam, Laos,
Cambodia, or beyond. The volume of this trade is
believed to pose a serious threat to the continued viabil-
ity of wild chelonian populations throughout Southeast
Asia (van Dijk et al., 2000).
Because turtles and tortoises are extensively and
visibly traded in Southeast Asia, most recent distribution
records are based on animals observed in trade rather
than collected from the wild. The geographic origin of
many trade specimens can be difficult if not impossible
to determine, especially those obtained in urban mar-
kets. Uncritical acceptance of these records by workers
has led to inaccurate characterization of species distribu-
tions, with serious biological, conservation, legal, and
regulatory implications. Additional confusion has result-
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 130
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
ed from the realization that some species of Asian turtles
described during the last two decades were based on
type specimens obtained from Hong Kong animal deal-
ers who provided inaccurate or fabricated locality data,
leaving the geographic origin of many in doubt (Dalton,
2003; Parham et al., 2001). Distribution records that
explicitly state how the turtles were obtained are there-
fore clearly important, given the historical paucity of
information, uncertainties in recent literature, and the
serious conservation threats faced by these taxa.
We here report recent distribution records of chelo-
nians from Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam that can be
verified with voucher specimens or photographs. These
records were obtained by (1) us during herpetological
surveys conducted from February 1998 through May
2001, (2) other workers in the region between 1993 and
June 2002, and provided to us, or (3) other workers who
deposited specimens at the Field Museum of Natural
History, Chicago, USA since 1993. For each record we
note whether the specimen was collected in the field,
found in abandoned hunting camps, obtained from
hunters or residents in rural villages, or purchased from
markets.
It should be emphasized that our collecting activi-
ties had little if any detrimental impact on populations of
wild chelonians. The number of collected specimens on
which we report is insignificant when compared to the
millions of chelonians annually consumed by the
wildlife markets of southern China (Lau et al., 2000).
Furthermore, the majority of specimens we and others
collected in the field were shells of animals consumed
by rural villagers. Chelonian shells are commonplace
and easily obtained in villages; shells are retained by
hunters as trophies, sold or kept for medicinal purposes,
and used as food containers for domestic animals and
rice scoops. Our collecting activities certainly provided
no stimulus for the additional harvesting of wild chelo-
nians. Finally, we believe that further scientific collect-
ing is warranted in the region, as most species remain
under-represented in museum collections, and taxonom-
ic study can affect conservation priorities (Parham and
Shi, 2001; Stuart and Thorbjamarson, 2003).
Methods and Conventions
Measurements were taken to the nearest 0.1 cm with 80
cm sliding calipers. We use the following abbreviations:
CL = maximum straight carapace length, including
spines or projections (i.e. not necessarily the mid-line);
CW = maximum carapace width, including spines or
projections; PL = maximum plastron length, including
spines or projections; BD = maximum depth of complete
specimen (head and neck extended in trionychid speci-
mens). Measurements were not reported if shell damage
precluded accurate measurement.
Records are presented under each species account in
the following format where applicable: Field Museum of
Natural History (FMNH) or figure number, type of
record, measurements (defined above), locality includ-
ing coordinates if available, approximate elevation and
brief habitat description if field-collected, circumstances
of origin if not field-collected by collector or photogra-
pher, date specimen was collected or photographed, and
name of collector or photographer. In the case of records
obtained from hunters or villages, the name of collector
refers to the person who preserved the specimen or pro-
vided the record to us rather than to the name of the per-
son who actually captured it from the wild. In the same
cases, the date of collection refers to the date the collec-
tor (as previously defined) obtained the specimen or
took the photograph rather than to the date it was
removed from the wild.
GPS coordinates are presented only if the original
collector provided them, and in the same format as orig-
inally provided. Coordinates that we generated for the
purposes of mapping the records are not presented.
Marine turtle records are not mapped.
Species Accounts
Platysternidae
Platysternon megacep/ialum Gray, 1831
[Map 1]
Laos. - Fig. 1, photograph only, Huaphahn Province,
Vieng Tong District, Ban Sa Kok Village, 20° IF N
103° 12' E, captured by resident of Ban Sa Kok, 29 April
1998, B. L. Stuart. FMNH 258749, complete specimen,
CL = 9.3, CW = 7.3, PL = 6.9, BD = 2.6, Bolikhamxay
Province, Khamkeut District, Nape border area, stream
in wet evergreen forest, 19 March 1997, D. Davenport.
Fig. 2 (and Fig. 4 in Stuart and Timmins, 2000), photo-
graph only, Khammouan Province, Nakai District,
Nakai-Nam Theun National Biodiversity Conservation
Area, Ban Xiangthong Village, 17° 54' 05" N 105° 23'
50" E, one of eleven individuals in the possession of a
Vietnamese trader leaving Ban Xiangthong, 17
November 1998, B. L. Stuart. Fig. 3, photograph only,
Xe Kong Province, Dakchung District, Ban Daklan
Village, 15° 21.61' N 107° 01.70' E, captured by resi-
dents of Ban Daklan, D. Showier, December 1997.
Vietnam. - FMNH 252164, complete specimen, CL =
1 5.5, C W — 1 1 .6, PL =12.7, BD = 5.2, Gia-Lai Province,
Ankhe District, Buon Loi Village, 20 km northwest of
Kannack town, Annamite Mountains, 14° 20' N 108° 36'
E, 700-750 m, found in burrow under overhanging
stream bank, 31 March 1995, I. Darevsky and N& L.
Orlov.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 131
Remarks. - Ziegler (2002) reported the species in local
trade in Ha Tinh Province, Vietnam.
Geoemydidae
Batagur baska (Gray, 1831 “1830-35”)
[Map 2]
Cambodia. - Platt et al. (2003) reviewed the status of B.
baska in Cambodia and reported on a breeding popula-
tion in the Sre Ambel River System of Koh Kong
Province.
Cuora amboinensis (Daudin, 1 802)
[Map 3]
Cambodia. - Fig. 4, photograph only, Battambang
Province, Ek Phnom District, Koh Chivang Commune,
Prek Toal Village on Tonle Sap Lake, 13° 14' 28" N 103°
39' 32" E, captured by residents of Prek Toal, 27 August
1999, B. L. Stuart, J. Smith, and K. Davey. FMNH
259411, broken carapace and plastron, Kandal Province,
Trayo Village, 11° 19’ 02" N 105°09’ 47" E, obtained
from hunter in Trayo, 05 July 2000, S. G. Platt. Fig. 5,
photograph only, two living turtles, CL = 19.3 and PL =
17.5, CL = 20.6 and PL = 18.9, Kampong Thom
Province, Sary Village, 12° 48.48' N 104° 44.19’ E, col-
lected by Sary residents in Tonle Sap, 21 June 2000, S.
G. Platt, Heng Sovannara, and Long Kheng. Fig. 6, pho-
tograph only, CL = 20.4 cm, PL = 18.5, Koh Kong
Province, Sre Ambel Town, in house of wildlife trader,
1 1 ° 07.30’ N; 1 03° 44.73’ E, 27 August 2000, S. G. Platt,
B. L. Stuart, and Vuthy Monyrath. Fig. 7, photograph
only, CL = 11.6, PL = 11.0, Koh Kong Province, Koh
Kong Town near municipal airport, 11° 37.11’ N; 103°
00.98’ E, crossing road in open grassland bordered by
Melaleuca and Rhizophora swamp, 07 February 2001,
S. G. Platt, Heng Sovannara, and Long Kheng.
Laos. - FMNH 255262, complete specimen, CL = 16.7,
CW = 11.7, PL = 15.2, BD = 7.5, Champasak Province,
Mounlapamok District, Dong Khanthung Proposed
National Biodiversity Conservation Area, Ban Khiem
Village, 14° 14’ N 105° 20’ E, captured by residents of
Ban Khiem for food, 24 July 1998, B. L. Stuart.
Vietnam. - Fig. 8, photograph only, Kien Giang
Province, An Minh District, photographed in a reptile
trade shop, 09° 45’ 04" N 104° 59’ 35" E, 31 October
2000, B. L. Stuart.
Cuora galbinifrons Bourret, 1939
[Map 4]
Laos. - FMNH 256544, complete specimen, CL = 16.6,
C W = 12.2, PL = 1 6.2, BD = 8.0, Khammouan Province,
Nakai District, Nakai-Nam Theun National Biodiversity
Conservation Area, 17° 50’ N 105° 35’ E, 900 m, wet
evergreen forest, found under brush in leaf litter on hill-
side 500 m from nearest stream, 13 December 1998, B.
L. Stuart. FMNH 255273, carapace only, CL = 18.1,
CW = 12.9, Khammouan Province, Yommalat District,
Khammouan Limestone (= Phou Hin Poun) National
Biodiversity Conservation Area, Ban That Mouang Khai
Village, 17° 32’ N 105° 04’ E, consumed by residents of
Ban That Mouang Khai, 01 April 1998, B. L. Stuart.
Vietnam. - FMNH 255694, complete specimen, CL =
19.2, CW = 13.0, PL = 18.0, BD = 8.5, Nghe An
Province, Tuong Duong District, Pu Mat Nature
Reserve, 19° 03’ N 104° 37’ E, 600 m, wet evergreen hill
forest, in leaf litter along Khe Mat Stream, 14 September
1998, B. L. Stuart. FMNH 255695, complete specimen,
repatriated to Vietnam before measurements could be
taken, collecting information same as FMNH 255694.
Remarks. - The subspecies C. galbinifrons galbinifrons
Bourret, 1939 is treated here as a full species following
the recommendation of Stuart and Parham (2004).
Ziegler (2002) reported the species in local trade in Ha
Tinh Province, Vietnam, and Fritz et al. (2002) reported
hybrids of C. galbinifrons and C. bourreti in local trade
in Ha Tinh and Quang Binh Provinces, Vietnam.
Cuora mouhotii (Gray, 1862)
[Map 5]
Laos. - FMNH 258880, carapace only, CL = 16.1, CW
= 11.0, Khammouan Province, Boualapha District, Hin
Nam No National Biodiversity Conservation Area, Ban
Tasang Village, eaten by residents of Ban Tasang, 30
December 1995, R. J. Timmins. FMNH 258881 , cara-
pace only, CL= 17.3, CW = 13.0, collecting information
same as FMNH 258880. FMNH 258887, plastron only,
PL = 16.8, Bolikhamxay Province, Nam Kading
National Biodiversity Conservation Area, eaten by vil-
lagers living in Nam Kading, 01 May 1995, R. J.
Timmins.
Remarks. - The species mouhotii was previously placed
in the monotypic genus Pyxidea Gray, 1863, but we allo-
cate it to the genus Cuora following Honda et al. (2002)
and Stuart and Parham (2004). Ziegler (2002) reported
the species in local trade in Ha Tinh Province, Vietnam.
Cyclemys atripons Iverson and McCord, 1997
[Map 6]
Cambodia. - FMNH 259050, complete specimen, CL =
21.4, CW = 16.2, PL = 20.7, BD = 8.4, Mondolkiri
Province, Pichrada District, Phnom Nam Lyr Wildlife
Vol. 10, p. 132
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Sanctuary, near 12° 32' 16" N 107° 32' 00" E, 600-700
m, evergreen gallery forest, found on sand bank at base
of large boulder 1.5 m from swift, shallow stream, 21
June 2000, B. L. Stuart. FMNH 259051, complete spec-
imen, CL = 22.7, CW = 17.0, PL = 21.2, BD = 8.0, Koh
Kong Province, Sre Ambel District, Sre Ambel Town,
11° 07' 20" N 103° 44' 45" E, obtained from turtle trad-
er who reported specimen came from Sophat Village,
downstream from Sre Ambel Town, 27 August 2000, B.
L. Stuart and S. G. Platt. FMNH 259052, complete spec-
imen, CL = 18.0, CW = 15.0, PL =16.7, BD = 6.2, col-
lecting information same as FMNH 259051. FMNH
259412, carapace and incomplete plastron, CL = 19.3,
CW = 15.2, Koh Kong Province, Sre Ambel District,
BoeungTradok Pong Village, 11° 31' 10" N 103° 46' 55"
E, obtained from hunter in Boeung Tradok Pong, 24
August 2000, B. L. Stuart and S. G. Platt. FMNH
259414, plastron only, PL = 16.5, collecting information
same as FMNH 259412. FMNH 259415, plastron only,
PL = 16.2, collecting information same as FMNH
259412. FMNH 259416, plastron only, PL = 14.9, Koh
Kong Province, Sre Ambel District, Chaouethail Pious
Village on Sre Ambel River, 11° 18' 03' N, 103° 44'
56”E, obtained from hunter in Chaouethail Pious, 21
August 2000, B. L. Stuart and S. G. Platt. FMNH
259417, plastron only, PL = 19.2, collecting information
same as FMNH 259416. FMNH 259422, plastron only,
PL = 20.2, Koh Kong Province, Sre Ambel District,
Chay Reap Village, west bank of Sre Ambel River, 11°
29' 10" N 103° 47' 00" E, <10 m, obtained from hunter
in Chay Reap, 23 August 2000, B. L. Stuart and S. G.
Platt. Fig. 9, photograph only, two living animals, CL =
13.7 cm and PL = 13.0 cm, CL = 20.8 cm and PL = 19.6
cm, Koh Kong Province, Kaoh Pao River, 11° 44.46' N;
103° 04.80' E, surrounding hills covered in dense ever-
green forest with some mangrove along shoreline,
obtained from fishermen, taken in crab traps set in river,
10 May 2001, S. G. Platt, Heng Sovannara, and Long
Kheng.
Remarks. - Fritz and Ziegler ( 1 999) reviewed records of
Cyclemys from the region. Species boundaries within
the genus Cyclemys remain uncertain (Fritz and Ziegler,
1999; Guicking et ah, 2002). The specimens we
assigned to C. atripons have plastra that are largely yel-
low with densely pigmented bridges; complete speci-
mens exhibit nearly immaculate chins. These character-
istics are typical of both C. atripons and C. pulchristri-
ata Fritz, Gaulke & Lehr, 1997, two species that were
described almost concurrently in 1997. Cyclemys
atripons and C. pulchristriata have been considered the
same taxon (Iverson in Guicking et ah, 2002). However,
Fritz et ah (2001) concluded that C. atripons has more
ventral neck stripes (7-8 light and 7-9 dark stripes when
counted from one mouth comer to the other) than C. pul-
christriata (5-7 light and 5-7 dark stripes). FMNH
259050 has 8 dark and 7 light ventral neck stripes,
FMNH 259051 has 10 dark and 9 light ventral neck
stripes, but in FMNH 259052 the ventral side of the neck
is nearly immaculate like the chin and completely lacks
striping. These few samples demonstrate that ventral
neck stripes are more variable than stated by Fritz et ah
(2001). In a phylogenetic analysis of a 982 bp fragment
of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene, Guicking et ah
(2002) recovered two clades in the atripons-pulchristri-
ata complex that differed by up to 4.5% sequence diver-
gence. Samples referred to atripons and pulchristriata
appeared in both clades, but the authors assigned these
names according to whether the sample originated from
Cambodia {atripons) or Vietnam {pulchristriata ), rather
than based on their morphology. The findings of
Guicking et ah (2002) suggest that more than one
species of Cyclemys with mostly yellow plastra, densely
pigmented bridges, and immaculate chins could exist,
but it remains unclear whether the two clades corre-
spond to what have been described as atripons and pul-
christriata. We assign the name C. atripons rather than
C. pulchristriata to our samples because the type locali-
ty of C. atripons is geographically closer to most of our
samples than to that of C. pulchristriata. Clearly, further
studies into the morphological and genetic variation in
Cyclemys are warranted, particularly with samples of
certain provenance.
Cyclemys tcheponensis (Bourret, 1939)
[Map 7]
Laos. - Fig. 10 (and Fig. 7d in Stuart et ah, 2001), pho-
tograph only, Bolikhamxay Province, Thaphabat
District, Phou Khao Khouay National Biodiversity
Conservation Area, near That Xay Waterfall, 1 8° 27' N
103° 10' E, 300 m, dry evergreen forest mixed with bam-
boo, sleeping on bottom of 4 x 4 m pool in forested
stream, 26 June 1998, B. L. Stuart. FMNH 258870,
complete specimen, CL = 9.7, CW = 8.0, PL = 8.7, BD
= 3.6, Bolikhamxay Province, Khamkeut District, pur-
chased in Lac Xao Market, 14 December 1996, D.
Davenport. FMNH 258871, complete specimen, CL =
9.0, CW = 8.1, PL = 8.3, BD = 3.6, collecting informa-
tion same as FMNH 258870. FMNH 258875, complete
specimen, CL = 20.6, CW = 15.2, PL = 20.3, BD = 8.5,
Khammouan Province, Nakai District, Houay Moey
Stream (tributary of Nam Pheo River), Ban Na Meo
Village, dry evergreen forest, 07 March 1997, D.
Davenport and J. Chamberlain. FMNH 255263, com-
plete specimen, CL= 17.1, CW = 13.6, PL= 16.1, BD =
6.5, Khammouan Province, Nakai District, Khammouan
Limestone (= Phou Hin Poun) National Biodiversity
2004
Asiatic Herpctological Research
Vol. 10, p. 133
Conservation Area, 17° 53' N 104° 52' E, 570 m, dry
evergreen lorest mixed with deciduous trees and pine,
caught on streambank by hunter using dog, 26 March
1998, B. L. Stuart and T. Chan-ard.
Remarks. - Species boundaries within the genus
Cycle my s remain uncertain (Fritz and Ziegler, 1999;
Guicking et al., 2002). The specimens we assigned to C.
tcheponensis have dark radiating patterns of the plastra,
pigmented chins, head and neck stripes, and dorsal spot-
ting on the crown of the head, as illustrated by Fritz and
Ziegler (1999) and Fritz et al. (1997). Fritz and Ziegler
(1999) reviewed records of Cyclemys from the region,
and Ziegler (2002) reported the species in local trade in
Ha Tinh Province, Vietnam.
Cyclemys sp.
[Map 8]
Cambodia. - FMNH 259418, carapace only, CL = 19.5,
CW = 14.7, Kampong Speu Province, Koh Kong
Samling Logging Concession, 11° 24' 15" N 103° 49'
47" E, 200 m, recovered from hunter’s camp, mixed
deciduous forest and grassland, 15 February 2000, J.
Walston. FMNH 259419, carapace only, CL = 22.1, CW
= 16.1, collecting information same as FMNH 259418.
FMNH 259420, carapace only, CL = 19.1, CW = 15.9,
collecting information same as FMNH 259418. FMNH
259421, plastron only, PL = 21.2, collecting information
same as FMNH 259418. FMNH 259423, plastron only,
PL = 21.0, Koh Kong Province, Sre Ambel District,
Chay Reap Village, west bank of Prek Sre Ambel River,
11° 29' 10" N 103° 47' 00" E, <10 m, obtained from
hunter in Chay Reap, 23 August 2000, B. L. Stuart and
S. G. Platt.
Laos. - FMNH 258893, carapace only, CL = 21.8, CW
= 16.6, Champasak Province, Pakxong District, Ban
Latsasin Village, near Xe Nam Noy River, 800 m, eaten
by residents of Ban Latsasin Village, 02 April 1995, T.
D. Evans.
Remarks. - The condition of these shell fragments pre-
cludes identifying them to species. They are not neces-
sarily a species different from atripons or tcheponensis.
Heosemys grand is (Gray, 1860)
[Map 9]
Cambodia. - FMNH 259409, carapace only, CL = 30.5,
CW = 22.6, Phnom Penh, Oreussay Market, purchased
in market, 17 May 1999, S. G. Platt. FMNH 259405,
plastron only, PL = 26.5, Koh Kong Province, Sre
Ambel District, Boeung Tradok Pong Village, 11° 31'
10' N 103° 46' 55" E, obtained from hunter in Boeung
Tradok Pong, 24 August 2000, B. L. Stuart and S. G.
Platt. FMNH 259406, plastron only, PL = 20.8, Koh
Kong Province, Sre Ambel District, Chaouethail Pious
Village on Sre Ambel River, 11° 18' 03" N 103° 44' 56"
E, obtained from hunter in Chaouethail Pious, 21 August
2000, B. L. Stuart and S. G. Platt. Fig. 11, photograph
only, CL = 3 1 .8, PL = 28.6, Koh Kong Province, Thmor
Andart Village along Stoeng Metoek River, 11° 49.23'
N, 102° 53.62' E, captured by residents of Thmor
Andart, 10 May 2001, S. G. Platt, Heng Sovannara, and
Long Kheng. FMNH 259407, plastron only, PL = 19.4,
collecting information same as FMNH 259406.
Laos. - FMNH 255271, carapace only, CL = 23.6, CW
= 18.3, Khammouan Province, Thakhek District,
Khammouan Limestone (= Phou Hin Poun) National
Biodiversity Conservation Area, Ban Na Village, 1 7° 33'
N, 104° 52' E, eaten by residents of Ban Na, 02 April
1998, B. L. Stuart. FMNH 258885, plastron only, PL =
27.0, Khammouan Province, Khammouan Limestone (=
Phou Hin Poun) National Biodiversity Conservation
Area, Ban Namphick Village, eaten by residents of Ban
Namphick, 22 May 1994, R. J. Timmins. FMNH
258894, carapace only, CL = 36.3, CW = 24.7, collect-
ing information same as FMNH 258885. FMNH
258889, plastron only, PL = 13.9, Laos, Khammouan
Province, Khammouan Limestone (= Phou Hin Poun)
National Biodiversity Conservation Area, Ban
Chocksavang Village, eaten by residents of Ban
Chocksavang, 22 May 1994, R. J. Timmins. FMNH
258882, carapace only, CL = 23.2, CW = 19.1,
Savannakhet Province, Thaphangthong District, Xe
Bang Nouan National Biodiversity Conservation Area.
Ban Houay Meun Village, eaten by residents of Ban
Houay, 20 June 1994, R. J. Timmins. FMNH 258883.
carapace (broken) and plastron only, PL = 36.6. collect-
ing information same as FMNH 258882 except collect-
ed 19 June 1994. FMNH 258877, carapace only, CL =
34.1, CW = 24.2, Salavan Province, Toumlan District.
Xe Bang Nouan National Biodiversity Conservation
Area, Ban Nalan Village, eaten by residents of Ban
Nalan, 15 June 1994, R. .1. Timmins. FMNH 258878.
intact shell only, CL = 36.8. CW = 25.8, PL = 35.3, BD
= 14.7, Salavan Province, Xe Bang Nouan National
Biodiversity Conservation Area, Ban Konglur Village,
eaten by residents of Ban Konglur, 10 June 1994, R. J.
Timmins. FMNH 258891, carapace only, CL = 17.3,
CW = 15.1, Salavan Province, Xe Bang Nouan National
Biodiversity Conservation Area, Ban Nasompeng
Village, eaten by residents of Ban Nasompeng, 09 June
1994, R. J. Timmins. FMNH 258890, carapace (broken)
only, CL = 19.4, Champasak Province, Pathoumphon
District, Xe Pian National Biodiversity Conservation
Area, Xe Pian River upstream from Ban Phonsaat
Village, 100 m, discarded in camp along Xe Pian River
2004
Figures 1-15. See text for locality details and circumstances of the record. 1. Platysternon megacephalum Huaphahn
Province, Laos (photo B. L. Stuart); 2. Platysternon megacephalum Khammouan Province, Laos (photo B. L. Stuart)
3. Platysternon megacephalum Xe Kong Province, Laos (photo D. Showier); 4. Cuora amboinensis Battambang
Province, Cambodia (photo B. L. Stuart); 5. Cuora amboinensis Kampong Thom Province, Cambodia (photo S G
Platt); 6. Cuora amboinensis Koh Kong Province, Cambodia (photo S. G. Platt); 7. Cuora amboinensis Koh Konq
Province, Cambodia (photo S. G. Platt). 8. Cuora amboinensis Kien Giang Province, Vietnam (photo B L Stuart)' 9
Cyclemys atripons Koh Kong Province, Cambodia (photo S. G. Platt); 10. Cyclemys tcheponensis Bolikhamxav
Province, Laos (photo B. L. Stuart); 11. Heosemys grandis Koh Kong Province, Cambodia (photo S G Platt) 12
Hieremys annandalii Battambang Province, Cambodia (photo B. L. Stuart); 13. Hieremys annandalii Siem Reap
Province, Cambodia (photo S. G. Platt); 14. Hieremys annandalii Kampong Thom Province, Cambodia (photo S G
Platt); 15. Malayemys subtrijuga Battambang Province, Cambodia (photo B. L. Stuart).
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 135
Figures 16-27. See text for locality details and circumstances of the record. 16. Malayemys subtrijuga Kampong Thom
Province, Cambodia (photo S. G. Platt); 17. Malayemys subtrijuga Kandal Province, Cambodia (photo S. G. Platt); 18.
Malayemys subtrijuga Vientiane, Laos (photo W. G. Robichaud). 19. Manouria impressa Koh Kong Province,
Cambodia (photo S. G. Platt). 20. Manouria impressa Ratanakiri Province, Cambodia (photo Suon Phalla/TRAFFIC).
21. Manouria impressa Xe Kong Province, Laos (photo B. L. Stuart). 22. Chelonia mydas Kampong Speu Province,
Cambodia (photo B. L. Stuart). 23. Eretmochelys imbricata Sihanoukville Province, Cambodia (photo S. G. Platt). 24.
Dermochelys coriacea Gulf of Thailand, near Sihanoukville, Cambodia (photo Vanna Nhem). 25. Amyda cartilaginea
Koh Kong Province, Cambodia (photo S. G. Platt). 26. Amyda cartilaginea Khammouan Province, Laos (photo B. L.
Stuart). 27. Pelochelys cantorii Kratie Province, Cambodia (photo D. Gambade).
after being eaten by hunters. May 1995, T. D. Evans.
FMNH 255266, complete specimen, CL = 7.5, CW
6.4, PL = 6.2, BD = 2.5, Champasak Province,
Mounlapamok District, Dong Khanthung Proposed
National Biodiversity Conservation Area, 14° 07' N 105°
29' E, 60 m, grassland with dry dipterocaip and ever-
green forest along Xe Lepou River, found in mud at bot-
tom of flooded marsh, water depth about 15 cm, 1 1 July
1998, B. L. Stuart. FMNH 255272, carapace only, CL =
28.6, CW = 22.2, Champasak Province, Mounlapamok
District, Dong Khanthung Proposed National
Biodiversity Conservation Area, Ban Thahin Village, on
Xe Lepou River, 14° 08' N 105° 35' E. 60 m, eaten by
residents of Ban Thahin, 17 July 1998. B. L. Stuart.
Vol. 10, p.
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
CM
O
CM
110 E
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 137
2 Z
o m o
CNJ T- T-
o
CNI
m
110 E
Vol. 10, p. 138
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
o
CM
in
o
T —
110 E
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 139
z
o
<N
to
110 E
Vol. 10, p. 140
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
o
<N
to
O
110 E
z
o
f\l
z
io
o
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 141
o
CM
LO
110 E
o m o
cm T- T-
o
CM
in
110 E
Vol. 10, p. 142
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
z
z
o
CM
m
110 E
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 143
o
CNJ
in
110 E
Vol. 10, p. 144
Asiatic Herpetologicai Research
2004
20 N
15 N
10 N
o
m
Maps 1-17 of records given in the text: shaded circles represent records collected in the field; half-shaded circles rep-
resent records obtained from hunters, abandoned hunting camps, or villages; unshaded circles represent records pur-
chased from markets.
Hieremys annandalii (Boulenger, 1903)
[Map 10]
Cambodia. - FMNH 259408, carapace only, CL = 32.3,
CW = 24.8, Phnom Penh, Oreussay Market, purchased
in market, 17 May 1999, S. G. Platt. FMNH 258876,
carapace and plastron, CL = 40.3, CW = 26.9, PL = 35.5,
Battambang Province, Ek Phnom District, Koh Chivang
Commune, Prek Toal Village on Tonle Sap Lake, 13° 14'
28" N 103° 39' 32" E, <10 m, eaten by residents of Prek
Toal who captured it from nearby flooded forest, 27
August 1999, B. L. Stuart, J. Smith, K. Davey. Fig. 12,
photograph only, same collecting information as FMNH
258876 except not yet eaten. FMNH 259398, carapace
only, CL = 37.4, CW = 26.7, Siem Reap Province, Siem
Reap District, Choeng Khneas Port on Tonle Sap Lake,
found in fisherman’s house, 28 June 2000, B. L. Stuart
and S. G. Platt. Fig. 13, photograph only, two living ani-
mals, CL = 42. 1 and PL = 34.7, CL = 33.4 and PL = 28.2,
Siem Reap Province, Siem Reap District, Choeng
Khneas Village, 13° 15.18' N; 103° 49.37' E, collected
by residents of Choeng Khneas from Tonle Sap, 4
October 2000, S. G. Platt, Heng Sovannara, Long
Kheng, and Vuthy Monyrath. Fig. 14, photograph only,
CL = 37.2, PL = 28.4, Kampong Thom Province,
Kampong Thom Town, 12° 42.69' N; 104° 53.31' E,
photographed in market, 21 June 2000, S. G. Platt, Heng
Sovannara, and Long Kheng.
Laos. - FMNH 258879, carapace and plastron only, CL
= 33.3, CW = 23.0, PL = 31.3, Attapu Province,
Sanamsai District, Xe Pian River Basin, Ban Chanto
Village, 100-150 m, eaten by residents of Ban Chanto,
21 April 1995, T. D. Evans. FMNH 259399, carapace
only, CL — 29.7, CW — 22.0, Attapu Province, Sanamxai
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 145
District, Ban Mai Village, 14° 42' 30" E 106° 29' 50" E,
obtained trom hunter in Ban Mai, 18 September 2000,
B. L. Stuart and S. G. Platt.
Vietnam. - FMNH 259074, complete specimen, CL =
12.4, CW = 10.8, PL = 11.5, BD = 5.6, Kien Giang
Province, An Minh District, Dong Hoa Town, 09° 45'
25" N 105u 00' 03" E, <10m, purchased from a reptile
trade shop, 10 November 2000, B. L. Stuart.
Malayemys suhtrijuga (Schlegel and Muller, 1844)
[Map 11]
Cambodia. - FMNH 259404, carapace only, CL= 19.2,
CW = 14.1, Phnom Penh, purchased in market, 07 July
2000, S. G. Platt. FMNH 259403, carapace only, CL =
21.5, CW = 16.9, Siem Reap Province, Siem Reap
District, Siem Reap Town, purchased from turtle restau-
rant, 11 December 1999, S. G. Platt. Fig. 15, photograph
only, Battambang Province, Ek Phnom District, Koh
Chivang Commune, Prek Toal Village on Tonle Sap
Lake, 13° 14' 28" N 103° 39' 32" E, captured by resi-
dents of Prek Toal, 27 August 1999, B. L. Stuart, J.
Smith, K. Davey. FMNH 259402, plastron only, PL =
17.8, collecting information same as FMNH 259403.
FMNH 259401, carapace (broken) and plastron, CL =
23.2, PL = 20.0, Kampong Thom Province, Kampong
Thom Town, obtained from restaurant, 22 June 2000, S.
G. Platt. Fig. 16, photograph only, CL = 21.3, PL = 17.5,
Kampong Thom Province, Sary Village, 12° 48.48' N
104° 44.19' E, collected by residents of Sary in Tonle
Sap, 21 June 2000, S. G. Platt, Heng Sovannara, and
Long Kheng. Fig. 17, photograph only, CL = 19.8, PL =
16.6, Kandal Province, Bassac Marshes, Prasat Village,
11° 17.72' N, 105° 08.61' E, captured by residents of
Prasat, 5 July 2000, S. G. Platt, Heng Sovannara, and
Long Kheng. FMNH 259400, plastron only, PL = 12.6,
Koh Kong Province, Sre Ambel District, Chay Reap
Village, west bank of Sre Ambel River, 11° 29' 10" N
103° 47' 00" E, <10 m, obtained from hunter in Chay
Reap, 23° August 2000, B. L. Stuart and S. G. Platt.
Laos. - Fig. 18, photograph only, Vientiane
Municipality, Vientiane, crossing road near culvert, May
1999, W. G. Robichaud. FMNH 258868, complete spec-
imen, CL = 8.4, CW = 6.9, PL = 7.3, BD = 3.6, Vientiane
Municipality, Vientiane, purchased in That Luang Fresh
Food Market, 27 February 2000, B. L. Stuart. FMNH
255269, carapace only, CL = 15.9, CW = 12.9,
Khammouan Province, Yommalat District, Khammouan
Limestone (= Phou Hin Poun) National Biodiversity
Conservation Area, Ban Vieng Village, 17° 20' N, 104°
57' E, eaten by residents of Ban Vieng, 30 March 1998,
B. L. Stuart. FMNH 258888, plastron only, PL = 12.8,
Khammouan Province, Khammouan Limestone (= Phou
Hin Poun) National Biodiversity Conservation Area,
Ban Chocksavang Village, eaten by residents of Ban
Chocksavang, 22 May 1994, R. J. Timmins. FMNH
259653 plastron (broken) only, collecting information
same as FMNH 258888. FMNH 259654, plastron only,
PL = 12.5, collecting information same as FMNH
258888. FMNH 255268, intact shell, CL = 10.9, CW =
8.8, PL = 9.2, BD = 4.8, Champasak Province,
Mounlapamok District, Dong Khanthung Proposed
National Biodiversity Conservation Area, Ban Thahin
Village, on Xe Lepou River, 14° 08' N 105° 35' E, 60 m,
eaten by residents of Ban Thahin, 17 July 1998, B. L.
Stuart. FMNH 255267, complete specimen, CL = 10.9,
CW = 8.4, PL = 9.3, BD = 4.7, Champasak Province,
Mounlapamok District, Dong Khanthung Proposed
National Biodiversity Conservation Area, Ban Tap Seng
Village, 14° 15' N 105° 41' E, mixed deciduous forest,
captured by resident of Ban Tap Seng for food, 25 July
1998, B. L. Stuart.
Vietnam. - FMNH 259075, complete specimen, CL =
5.3, CW = 4.3, PL = 4.4, BD = 2.7, Kien Giang
Province, Vinh Thuang District, U Minh Thuong Nature
Reserve, 09° 32' 40" N 105° 05' 11" E, <10m, flooded
grassland and agricultural fields, caught in fishing net
set in canal, 02 November 2000, B. L. Stuart. FMNH
259394, complete specimen, CL = 4.8, CW = 3.8, PL =
3.9, BD = 2.4, Kien Giang Province, An Minh District,
U Minh Thuong Nature Reserve, 09° 37' 29" N 105° 07'
59" E, <10m, flooded grassland and agricultural fields,
taken in fishing net, 16 November 2000, B. L. Stuart.
Sacalia quadriocellata (Siebenrock, 1903)
[Map 12]
Laos. - FMNH 255270, carapace only, CL = 13.8, CW
= 10.6, Huaphahn Province, Vieng Tong District, Nam
Et National Biodiversity Conservation Area, Nam Peun
River, 20° 17’ N 103° 25' E, 985 m, found in hunter’s
camp, 01 April 1998, P. Davidson. FMNH 256542,
complete specimen, CL = 14.2, CW = 10.3, PL =12.5,
BD = 4.5, Khammouan Province, Nakai District, Nakai-
Nam Theun National Biodiversity Conservation Area,
Annamite Mountains, 17° 50' N 105° 35' E, 600 m, wet
evergreen forest along Houay Dreng Stream, found 1 m
deep in pool with sandy substrate, 01 December 1999,
B. L. Stuart. FMNH 256543, complete specimen, CL =
7.2, CW = 6.7, PL = 5.9, BD = 2.8, Khammouan
Province, Nakai District, Nakai-Nam Theun National
Biodiversity Conservation Area, Annamite Mountains,
17° 56' N 105° 31' E, 600 m, Houay Maka-Noi Stream
near Ban Maka Village, collected by resident of Ban
Maka, 15 November 1999, B. L. Stuart.
Remarks. - Ziegler (2002) field-collected and reported
the species in local trade in Ha Tinh Province, Vietnam.
Vol. 10, p. 146
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Siebenrockiella crass icollis (Gray, 1831)
[Map 13]
Cambodia. - FMNH 259054, complete specimen, CL =
14.3, CW = 10.5, PL = 11.7, BD = 5.8, KhampongThom
Province, Khampong Thom Town, 12° 42' N 104° 53' E,
purchased from turtle trader in Khampong Thom Town,
21 June 2000, S. G. Platt. FMNH 259053, whole speci-
men, CL = 15.9, CW - 12.0, PL =13.7, BD = 6.8, Koh
Kong Province, Sre Ambel District, Chay Reap Village,
west bank of Sre Ambel River, 11° 29' 10" N 103° 47'
00" E, <10 m, captured by residents of Chay Reap, 24
August 2000, B. L. Stuart and S. G. Platt. FMNH
259396, intact shell, CL = 16.4, CW = 12.1, PL = 13.7,
BD = 6.6, Koh Kong Province, Sre Ambel District, Chay
Reap Village, west bank of Sre Ambel River, 1 1° 29' 10"
N, 103° 47' 00" E, <10 m, obtained from hunter in Chay
Reap, 24 August 2000, B. L. Stuart and S. G. Platt.
FMNH 259397, plastron only, PL = 16.1, Koh Kong
Province, Sre Ambel District, Kohriem Village on Sre
Ambel River, obtained from hunter in Kohriem, 27
August 2000, B. L. Stuart and S. G. Platt. FMNH
259055, complete specimen, CL = 16.2, CW = 11.5, PL
= 12.8, BD = 5.9, Koh Kong Province, Sre Ambel
District, Prek Kroch River (tributary of Sre Ambel
River), 11° 06' 20" N, 103° 39’ 35" E, <10 m, flooded
paddy at edge of mangrove and Melaleuca forest, cap-
tured by fisherman in bamboo fish trap set at that loca-
tion, 27 August 2000, B. L. Stuart and S. G. Platt.
Remarks. - FMNH 259053 has a pale streak extending
from the ear to the lower jaw, but the heads of FMNH
259054-55 are entirely dark, with no pale markings.
Testudinidae
Indotestudo elongata { Blyth, 1853)
[Map 14]
Cambodia: FMNH 262316, carapace only, CL = 14.7,
CW = 10.0, Mondolkiri Province, Keo S’Marr District,
Samling Logging Concession, 200 m, mixed deciduous
forest and grassland, found in hunter’s camp, 13 May
2000, J. Walston. FMNH 262315, plastron only, PL =
19.8, Koh Kong Province, Sre Ambel District, Chay
Reap Village, west bank of Sre Ambel River, 1 1° 29' 10"
N, 103° 47' 00" E, <10 m, obtained from hunter in Chay
Reap, 23 August 2000, B. L. Stuart and S. G. Platt.
TC001 (held in the Field Museum of Natural History,
Division of Amphibians & Reptiles), blood sample only,
collecting information same as FMNH 262315, obtained
from hunter in Chay Reap and released after taking
blood sample, 23 August 2000, B. L. Stuart and S. G.
Platt. FMNH 262312, plastron only, PL = 18.2, collect-
ing information same as FMNH 262315. FMNH
262307, carapace only, CL = 25.6, CW = 15.1, collect-
ing information same as FMNH 262315. FMNH
262297, carapace only, CL = 24.7, CW = 14.6, Koh
Kong Province, Sre Ambel District, Boeung Tradok
Pong Village, 11° 31' 10" N, 103° 46' 55" E, obtained
from hunter in Boeung Tradok Pong, 24 August 2000, B.
L. Stuart and S. G. Platt. FMNH 262313, plastron only,
PL = 19.4, collecting information same as FMNH
262297. FMNH 262314, plastron only, PL = 18.2, col-
lecting information same as FMNH 262297. FMNH
262302, carapace and plastron, CL = 19.5, CW = 13.0,
PL = 16.5, Koh Kong Province, Sre Ambel District,
Kohriem Village on Sre Ambel River, obtained from
hunter in Kohriem, 27 August 2000, B. L. Stuart and S.
G. Platt. FMNH 262311, plastron only, PL =15.4, Koh
Kong Province, Sre Ambel District, Chaouethail Pious
Village on Sre Ambel River, 11° 18' 03" N, 103° 44' 56"
E, obtained from hunter in Chaouethail Pious, 21 August
2000, B. L. Stuart and S. G. Platt. FMNH 262310, plas-
tron only, PL = 14.8, collecting information same as
FMNH 262311.
Laos. - FMNH 262294, carapace only, CL = 22.8, CW
= 14.0, Khammouan Province, Boualapha District, Hin
Nam No National Biodiversity Conservation Area, Ban
Tasang Village, eaten by residents of Ban Tasang, 30
December 1995, R. J. Timmins. FMNH 259056, com-
plete specimen, CL = 17.0, CW = 10.9, PL = 14.8, BD =
7.4, Khammouan Province, Nakai District, Khammouan
Limestone (= Phou Hin Poun) National Biodiversity
Conservation Area, Ban Na Bon Village, limestone karst
with dry evergreen/mixed deciduous forest, 17° 54' N
104° 51' E, captured by residents of Ban Na Bon for
food, 22 March 1998, B. L. Stuart and T. Chan-ard.
FMNH 262304, carapace only, CL = 17.9, CW = 12.4,
Khammouan Province, Thakhek District, Khammouan
Limestone (= Phou Hin Poun) National Biodiversity
Conservation Area, Ban Na Village, 17° 33' N, 104° 52'
E, eaten by residents of Ban Na, 02 April 1998, B. L.
Stuart. FMNH 262299, carapace only, CL = 24.2, CW =
15.4, Khammouan Province, Khammouan Limestone (=
Phou Hin Poun) National Biodiversity Conservation
Area, Ban Namphick Village, eaten by residents of Ban
Namphick, 22 May 1994, R. J. Timmins. FMNH
262295, carapace only, CL = 25.2, CW = 15.1, collect-
ing information same as FMNH 262299. FMNH
262296, carapace only, CL = 26.9, CW = 16.7, Salavan
Province, Xe Bang Nouan National Biodiversity
Conservation Area, Ban Konglur Village, eaten by resi-
dents of Ban Konglur, 10 June 1994, R. J. Timmins.
FMNH 262301, carapace only, CL = 29.0, CW = 18.1.
Attapu Province, Xe Nam Noy River, Ban Mun Houa
Muang Village, 300 m, eaten by residents of Ban Mun
Houa Muang, April 1995, D. Showier. FMNH 262303.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 147
Figure 28. See text for locality details and circumstances
of the record. Pelochelys cantorii Champasak Province,
Laos (photo I. G. Baird).
carapace only, CL = 23.3, CW = 14.4, Attapu Province,
Sanamsai District, Xe Kong River, near Ban Sompoy
Village and Cambodian border, 90 m, discarded cara-
pace found in camp after being eaten by hunters, May
1995, T. D. Evans. FMNH 262298, carapace only, CL =
22.3, CW = 14.3, Champasak Province, Pathoumphon
District, Xe Pian National Biodiversity Conservation
Area, Xe Pian River upstream from Ban Phonsaat
Village, 100 m, discarded carapace found in camp along
Xe Pian River after being eaten by hunters. May 1995,
T. D. Evans. FMNH 262308, carapace only, CL = 17.7,
CW = 11.4, Champasak Province, Mounlapamok
District, Dong Khanthung Proposed National
Biodiversity Conservation Area, found in hunter’s camp
near Nong Sathevada Wetland, 14° 13' N 105° 36' E, 100
m, 04 March 1998, C. Francis. FMNH 262306, carapace
only, CL = 18.9, CW = 12.0, Champasak Province,
Mounlapamok District, Dong Khanthung Proposed
National Biodiversity Conservation Area, Ban Baw
Village, 14° 14'N, 105° 27' E, eaten by residents of Ban
Baw, 18 July 1998, B. L. Stuart. FMNH 262305, cara-
pace only, CL = 26.6, CW = 15.9, Champasak Province,
Mounlapamok District, Dong Khanthung Proposed
National Biodiversity Conservation Area, Ban Khiem
Village, 14° 14' N, 105° 20' E, eaten by residents of Ban
Khiem, 24 July 1998, B. L. Stuart. FMNH 262300,
carapace only, CL = 24.9, CW = 14.7, Champasak
Province, Mounlapamok District, Dong Khanthung
Proposed National Biodiversity Conservation Area, Ban
Kadian Village, 14° 26' N, 105° 42' E, eaten by residents
of Ban Kadian, 29 July 1998, B. L. Stuart.
Remarks. - Ziegler (2002) reported the species in local
trade in Ha Tinh Province, Vietnam.
Man our id impress a (Gunther, 1882)
[Map 15]
Cambodia. - Fig. 19, photograph only of two intact
shells, CL = 26.6 and PL = 23.8, CL = 22.8 and PL =
19.9, Koh Kong Province, Thmor Andart Village, along
Stoeng Metoek River, 1 1° 49.23' N, 102° 53.62' E, col-
lected by residents of Thmor Andart, 1 0 May 200 1 , S. G.
Platt, Heng Sovannara, and Long Kheng. Fig. 20, pho-
tograph only, Ratanakiri Province, Oyadao District,
found in house of Vietnamese wildlife trader on
Cambodian side of Oyadao border checkpoint, Suon
Phalla/TRAFFIC, 16 June 2002.
Laos. - FMNH 262321, carapace only, CL = 23.7, CW
= 17.3, Phongsaly Province, Phongsaly District, Phou
Dendin National Biodiversity Conservation Area, Ban
Sopkang Village, 22° 05'51"N, 102° 15' 02" E, eaten by
residents of Ban Sopkang, 17 October 1999, B. L. Stuart
and H. F. Heatwole. FMNH 262317, carapace only, CL
= 27.7, CW = 19.9, collecting information same as
FMNH 262321. FMNH 262324, carapace only, CL =
28.6, CW = 20.2, Huaphahn Province, Vieng Tong
District, Phou Louey National Biodiversity
Conservation Area, Ban Sa Kok Village, 20° 11" N, 103°
12" E, eaten by residents of Ban Sa Kok, 30 April 1998.
B. L. Stuart. FMNH 262319, carapace only, CL = 27.0.
CW = 19.9, collecting information same as FMNH
262324. FMNH 262323, carapace and plastron, CL =
20.8, CW= 16.3, PL= 19.4, collecting information same
as FMNH 26234. FMNH 262318, carapace only, CL =
25.0, CW = 19.2, Huaphahn Province, Vieng Tong
District, Phou Louey National Biodiversity
Conservation Area, Ban Phone Xong Village, eaten by
residents of Ban Phone Xong, 04 May 1998. D. Showier.
FMNH 262322, plastron only, PL = 21.1, Khammouan
Province, Hin Nam No National Biodiversity
Conservation Area, Ban Katok Village, eaten by resi-
dents of Ban Katok, 12 January 1996, R. J. Timmins.
Fig. 21, photograph only, Xe Kong Province, Kaleum
District, Ban Talouy-Ngai Village. 15° 59' 50" N, 106°
57' 22" E, captured by residents of Ban Talouy-Ngai, 27
June 1999, B. L. Stuart. FMNH 262320. carapace only,
CL = 27.6, CW = 20.6, Attapu Province, Xe Nam Noy
River, Ban Taot Village, 800 m, eaten by residents of
Ban Taot, April 1995, D. Showier.
Remarks. - Lehr and Holloway (2000) obtained a single
carapace of M. impressa from a hunter in Ratanakiri
Province, Cambodia, who claimed to have captured the
turtle in mountains north of Siem Pang, Stung Trens
Province.
Vol. 10, p. 148
Asiatic Herpeto/ogical Research
2004
Cheloniidae
Clielonia my das (Linnaeus, 1758)
Cambodia. - Fig. 22, photograph only, Kampong Speu
Province, Phnom Srouch District, Srei Khlong Market,
07 June 2000, B. L. Stuart.
Eretmoclielys imbricata (Linnaeus, 1766)
Cambodia. - Fig. 23, photograph only, Sihanoukville
Province, Mitta Pheap District, Koh Rong Island, Bagnu
Village, obtained from fisherman in Bagnu, 01 January
2000, F. Goes.
Dermochelyidae
Dermochelys coriacea (Vandelli, 1761)
Cambodia. - Fig. 24, photograph only. Stuart et al.
(2002) discussed in detail this record from offshore of
the southern point of Koh Sra Mauch Island in the Gulf
of Thailand, near Sihanoukville.
Trionychidae
Amy da cartilaginea (Boddaert, 1770)
[Map 16]
Cambodia. - Fig. 25, photograph only, CL = 7.4, Koh
Kong Province, Koh Kong Knong Village, 11° 25.97' N;
103° 09.77' E, captured locally by villager in Stoeng
Kep River, II May 2001, S. G. Platt, Heng Sovannara,
and Long Kheng.
Laos. - FMNH 258869, complete specimen, CL = 7.4,
CW = 6.8, PL = 2.1, BD = 5.7, Vientiane Municipality,
Vientiane, purchased in That Luang Fresh Food Market,
27 February 2000, B. L. Stuart. FMNH 258874, com-
plete specimen, CL = 29.5, CW = 26.0, PL = 20.6, BD =
9.5, Bolikhamxay Province, Northern Extension
Proposed National Biodiversity Conservation Area, Ban
Chom-Tong Village, near Nam Mouan River, captured
by hunters in Nam Mouan River, 18 March 1995, R. J.
Timmins. Fig. 26, photograph only, Khammouan
Province, Nakai District, Nakai-Nam Theun National
Biodiversity Conservation Area, Ban Kao-Oy Village,
17° 43' 39" N 105° 20' 05" E, captured by resident of
Ban Kao-Oy, 03 November 1998, B. L. Stuart. FMNH
255264, complete specimen, CL = 1 8.2, C W = 1 6.4, PL
= 13.8, BD = 4.5, Khammouan Province, Thakhek
District, Khammouan Limestone (= Phou Hin Poun)
National Biodiversity Conservation Area, 17° 33' N,
104° 52' E, obtained from villager who captured it while
fishing, 01 April 1998, B. L. Stuart. FMNH 255265,
complete specimen, CL - 1 8.7, CW 16.7, PL 15.2,
BD = 4.9, Khammouan Province, Nakai District,
Khammouan Limestone (= Phou Hin Poun) National
Biodiversity Conservation Area, 17° 54' N, 104° 51' E,
obtained from villager who caught it in the Nam Thon
River, 28 March 1998, B. L. Stuart.
Vietnam. - FMNH 252163, whole specimen, CL= 12.5,
CW = 10.7, PL = 10.4, BD = 3.8, Gia-Lai Province,
Ankhe District, Buon Loi Village, 20 km northwest of
Kannack Town, Annamite Mountains, 14L 20' N, 108°
36' E, 700-750 m, Daklest River in the village, 07 May
1995, I. Darevsky and N. L. Orlov.
Remarks. - Farkas and Ziegler (2002) reviewed records
of A. cartilaginea from Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia.
Peloclielys cantor ii Gray, 1 864
[Map 17]
Cambodia. - Fig. 27, photograph only, Kratie Province,
Kratie District, Kratie Town, purchased from fisherman
in a Kratie market and released in the Mekong River
after being photographed, September 2000, D.
Gambade.
Laos. - Fig. 28, photograph only, Champasak Province,
Khong District, Ban Hang Khone Village, captured by
residents of Ban Hang Khone in the Mekong River, I. G.
Baird.
Acknowledgments
We thank Ian Baird, James Chamberlain, Ilya Darevsky,
David Davenport, Peter Davidson, Thomas Evans,
Charles Francis, Heng Sovannara, Long Kheng, Denis
Gambade, Troy Hansel, Frederic Goes, Nikolai Orlov,
William Robichaud, Sergei Ryabov, Shi Haitao, David
Showier, Suon Phalla/TRAFFIC, and Robert Timmins
for providing us their specimens or photographs. We
thank An Dara, Bui Huu Manh, Tanya Chan-ard,
Benjamin Hayes, Harold Heatwole, Heng Sovannara,
Khamkoun Khounboline, Long Kheng, Nguyen Van
Cuong, Augustus McCrae, William Robichaud, Philip
Round, Suon Phalla, Bee Thaovanseng, and Vuthy
Monyrath for assistance with collecting specimens in the
field. The opportunity for BLS to work in Laos was
made possible by the Wildlife Conservation Society /
Division of Forest Resource Conservation Cooperative
Program, and in Vietnam by Fauna & Flora
International, CARE International in Vietnam, and the
staff of Pu Mat and U Minh Thuong Nature Reserves
The opportunity for BLS and SGP to work in Cambodia
was made possible by the Wildlife Conservation Society
/Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries/
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 149
Ministry ot Environment Collaborative Program.
Financial support was provided by the National
Geographic Society (Grant no. 6247-98 with Harold
Heatwole), the Wildlife Conservation Society, and The
John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Harold
Voris, Alan Resetar, and Jamie Fadonski facilitated
examining specimens at the Field Museum of Natural
History. Sean Bober constructed the maps. Two anony-
mous reviewers improved the manuscript.
Literature Cited
Bourret, R. 1941. Fes tortues de l’lndochine. Institut
Oceanographique de l’lndochine 38:1-235.
Dalton, R. 2003. Mock turtles. Nature 423:219-220.
Farkas, B. and T. Ziegler. 2002. A note on the distri-
bution of Amy da cartilaginea (Boddaert, 1770) in
Vietnam. Hamadryad 27(1): 149-154.
Fritz, U., M. Gaulke, and E. Fehr. 1997. Revision der
siidostasiatischen Dornschildkroten-Gattung
Cyclemys Bell, 1834, mit Beschreibung einer neuen
Art. Salamandra 33(3): 183-212.
Fritz, U. and T. Ziegler. 1999. Contribution to the
knowledge of Cyclemys tcheponensis (Bourret,
1939) and the distribution of Cyclemys in the
Indochinese region (Reptilia: Testudines:
Bataguridae). Revue frangaise de Aquariologie
26( 1 -2):7 1-78.
Fritz, U., D. Guicking, M. Wink, and E. Fehr. 2001. Sind
Cyclemys atripons Iverson & McCord, 1997 und
Cyclemys pulchristriata Fritz, Gaulke & Fehr, 1997
identisch? Sauria 23(2):33-38.
Fritz, U., Ziegler, T., Herrmann, H.-W., and Fehr, E.
2002. Intergradation between subspecies of Cuora
galbinifrons Bourret, 1939 and Pyxidea mouhotii
(Gray, 1862) in southern North Vietnam (Reptilia:
Testudines: Geoemydidae). Faunistische
Abhandlungen Staatliches Museum fur Tierkunde
Dresden 23(3):59-74.
Guicking, D., U. Fritz, M. Wink, and E. Lehr. 2002.
New data on the diversity of the Southeast Asian
leaf turtle genus Cyclemys Bell, 1834. Molecular
results (Reptilia: Testudines: Geoemydidae*).
Faunistische Abhandlungen Staatliches Museum fur
Tierkunde Dresden 23(4): 75-86.
Hendrie, D. B. 2000. Status and conservation of tortois-
es and freshwater turtles in Vietnam. Pp. 63-73. In
P. P. Van Dijk, B. L. Stuart, and A. G. J. Rhodin
(eds)., Asian Turtle Trade: Proceedings of a
Workshop on Conservation and Trade of Freshwater
Turtles and Tortoises in Asia. Chelonian Research
Monographs, No. 2. Chelonian Research
Foundation, Lunenburg, MA.
Holloway, R. H. P. 2003. Domestic trade of tortoises and
freshwater turtles in Cambodia. Linnaeus Fund
Research Report. Chelonian Conservation and
Biology 4(3):733-734.
Honda, M., Y. Yasukawa, R. Hirayama and H. Ota.
2002. Phylogenetic relationships of the Asian box
turtles of the genus Cuora sensu lato (Reptilia:
Bataguridae) inferred from mitochondrial DNA
sequences. Zoological Science 19(1 1): 1305- 13 12.
Iverson, J. B. 1992. A Revised Checklist with
Distribution Maps of the Turtles of the World.
Green Nature Books, Homestead, Florida. 363 pp.
Jenkins, M. D. 1995. Tortoises and Freshwater Turtles:
The Trade in Southeast Asia. TRAFFIC
International, United Kingdom. 48 pp.
Lau, M., B. Chan, P. Crow, and G. Ades. 2000. Trade and
conservation of turtles and tortoises in the Hong
Kong Special Administrative Region, People’s
Republic of China. Pp. 39-44. In P. P. Van Dijk, B.
L. Stuart, and A. G. J. Rhodin (eds)., Asian Turtle
Trade: Proceedings of a Workshop on Conservation
and Trade of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises in
Asia. Chelonian Research Monographs, No. 2.
Chelonian Research Foundation, Lunenburg, MA.
Le Dien Due and S. Broad. 1995. Investigations into
Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Trade in Vietnam.
IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland,
Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. 34 pp.
Lehr, E. 1997. Untersuchungen zum Schildkrotenhandel
in Vietnam zwischen 1993 und 1996. Zoologische
Gesellschaft fur Arten- und Populationsschutz
13(2): 12- 19.
Lehr, E. and R. Holloway. 2000. Geographic distribu-
tion: Manouria impressa (Impressed tortoise).
Herpetological Review 3 1 (2): 111.
Parham, J. F. and H. Shi. 2001. The discovery of
Mauremys iversoni- like turtles at a turtle farm in
Hainan Province, China: the counterfeit golden
coin. Asiatic Herpetological Research 9: 71-76.
Vol. 10, p. 150
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Parham, J. F., W. B. Simison, K. H. Kozak, C. R.
Feldman, and H. Shi. 2001. New Chinese turtles:
endangered or invalid? A reassessment of two
species using mitochondrial DNA, allozyme elec-
trophoresis and known-locality specimens. Animal
Conservation 2001(4):357-367.
Platt, S. G., B. L. Stuart, Heng Sovannara, Long Kheng,
Kalyar, and Heng Kimchay. 2003. Rediscovery of
the critically endangered river terrapin, Batagur
baska, in Cambodia, with notes on occurrence,
reproduction, and conservation status. Chelonian
Conservation and Biology 4(3):69 1-695.
Smith, M. A. 1931. The Fauna of British India, includ-
ing Ceylon and Burma. Reptilia and Amphibia. Vol.
1. Loricata, Testudines. Taylor and Francis, London.
185 pp.
Stuart, B. L. and J. F. Parham. 2004. Molecular phy-
logeny of the critically endangered Indochinese
box turtle ( Cuora galbinifrons). Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution 31:164-177.
Stuart, B. L. and J. Thorbjamarson. 2003. Biological pri-
oritization of Asian countries for turtle conserva-
tion. Chelonian Conservation and Biology
4(3):642-647.
Stuart, B. L., D. An, and P. P. van Dijk. 2002. A record
of the leatherback sea turtle Dermochelys coriacea
from Cambodia. Marine Turtle Newsletter 96:22.
Stuart, B. L. and R. J. Timmins. 2000. Conservation sta-
tus and trade of turtles in Laos. Pp. 58-62. In P. P.
Van Dijk, B. L. Stuart, and A. G. J. Rhodin (eds).,
Asian Turtle Trade: Proceedings of a Workshop on
Conservation and Trade of Freshwater Turtles and
Tortoises in Asia. Chelonian Research Monographs,
No. 2. Chelonian Research Foundation, Lunenburg,
MA.
Stuart, B. L., R. J. Timmins, D. B. Hendrie, S. Lieng, S.
Chun, P. Hout, K. Heng, T. S. Touch, H. L. Prak, T.
Chul, J. Compton, and R. Holloway. 2000. Turtle
trade in Indochina: regional summary (Cambodia,
Laos, and Vietnam). Pp. 74-76. In P. P. Van Dijk, B.
L. Stuart, and A. G. J. Rhodin (eds)., Asian Turtle
Trade: Proceedings of a Workshop on Conservation
and Trade of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises in
Asia. Chelonian Research Monographs, No. 2.
Chelonian Research Foundation, Lunenburg, MA.
Stuart, B. L., P. P. van Dijk, D. B. Hendrie. 2001.
Photographic Guide to the Turtles of Thailand,
Laos, Vietnam and Cambodia. Wildlife
Conservation Society, New York. 84 pp. [In four
bilingual versions: English/Thai, English/Lao,
English/Vietnamese, English/Khmer].
Timmins, R. J. and K. Khounboline. 1999. Occurrence
and trade of the Golden Turtle, Cuora trifasciata, in
Laos. Chelonian Conservation and Biology
3(3):44 1-447.
Touch, T. S., H. L. Prak, T. Chul, S. Lieng, S. Chun, P.
Hout, and K. Heng. 2000. Overview of the turtle
trade in Cambodia. Pp. 55-57. In P. P. Van Dijk, B.
L. Stuart, and A. G. J. Rhodin (eds)., Asian Turtle
Trade: Proceedings of a Workshop on Conservation
and Trade of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises in
Asia. Chelonian Research Monographs, No. 2.
Chelonian Research Foundation, Lunenburg, MA.
van Dijk, P. P., B. L. Stuart, and A. G. J. Rhodin (editors).
2000. Asian Turtle Trade: Proceedings of a
Workshop on Conservation and Trade of Freshwater
Turtles and Tortoises in Asia. Chelonian Research
Monographs, No. 2. Chelonian Research
Foundation, Lunenburg, MA.
Ziegler, T. 2002. Die Amphibien und Reptilien eines
Tieflandfeuchtwald-Schutzgebietes in Vietnam.
Natur & Tier - Verlag, Munster. 342 pp.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, pp. 151-160
Studies on Pakistan Lizards: Cyrtopodion stoliczkai (Steindachner, 1867)
(Gekkonidae: Gekkoninae)
Kurt Auffenberg1’*, Kenneth L. Krysko2, and Walter Auffenberg1
1 Florida Museum of Natural History, Powell Hall,
P. O. Box 112710, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
* E-mail: kauffe@flmnh.ufl.edu
2 Florida Museum of Natural History, Division of Herpetology,
P. O. Box 117800, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
V 1928-2004 )
Abstract. - Cyrtopodion stoliczkai (Steindachner, 1867) is diagnosed based on the examination of 44 morphological
characters in a series of 25 specimens collected near Skardu, Federally Administered Northern Areas (FANA),
Pakistan. Observations on geographic distribution, habitat, and reproduction are provided. The questionable taxo-
nomic status of Gymnodactylus yarkandensis Anderson, 1872 is discussed. Alsophylax {Altiphylax) boehmei
Szczerbak, 1991 is regarded as a junior synonym of C. stoliczkai.
Key words. - Cyrtopodion stoliczkai , Cyrtopodion yarkandensis, Alsophylax (Altiphylax) boehmei, gecko, lizard, tax-
onomy, Pakistan.
Introduction
The diverse gecko fauna of Pakistan is poorly under-
stood. Particularly problematic are the angular-toed or
thin-toed geckos variously assigned to Cyrtodactylus,
Cyrtopodion, and Tenuidactylus. Much of the taxonom-
ic confusion stems from a general dearth of adequate
material. Large series of specimens from which to iden-
tify variation in important taxonomic characters are
lacking in most cases. Examination of specimens col-
lected during surveys by Walter Auffenberg and the
Zoological Survey Department of Pakistan in the 1980s-
1990s provide insights to many questions regarding
some of these poorly defined taxa. One such species,
Cyrtopodion stoliczkai (Steindachner, 1867), is dis-
cussed below. Future contributions will examine addi-
tional species.
Materials and Methods
ITerpetological collections were made in the vicinity of
Skardu, Federally Administered Northern Areas
(FANA), Pakistan in late August 1991. A series (n = 25)
of Cyrtopodion stoliczkai comprised of all size classes
ranging from newborns to adults was collected from
under slabs of caliche broken off the edge of a dry creek
bed near the Skardu Airport, ca. 10 km west of Skardu.
These specimens were subsequently deposited in the
Florida Museum of Natural History, University of
Florida (UF 81327 - 81351).
This entire series was examined for 44 morpholog-
ical characters (Tables 1 and 2). Although most of these
counts and measurements are standard, clarification on
certain characters are provided. Only original (not
regenerated) tails were measured. The left side is given
first for scale counts taken on both sides of the speci-
men. Character 6 was obtained by counting the scales
surrounding five randomly selected enlarged dorsal
tubercles. Character 12 lists color bands in the following
order: occipital region, nape, body (from forelimbs to
sacrum), and original tail. Character 13 lists the left side
only for the number of scales between the eye and ear.
The numbers of longitudinal rows of enlarged dorsal
tubercles (Character 14) and transverse rows of ventral
scales (Character 15) were taken at mid-body.
Source acronyms follow Leviton et al. (1985):
BMNH (British Museum of Natural History, London);
MCZ (Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard
University); NMW (Naturhistorisches Museum. Wien);
UF (Florida Museum of Natural History, University of
Florida); ZFMK (Zoologischen Forschungsinstitutes
und Museums Alexander Koenig, Bonn); ZSI (Indian
Museum, Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta); ZSMH
(Zoologische Staatssammlung Miinchen).
Results
Table 2 illustrates the variation of 44 morphological
characters examined in 25 Cyrtopodion stoliczkai from
Skardu. We found that these characters overlap with
those available for Alsophylax (Altiphylax) boehmei
Szczerbak, 1991. Therefore, we believe that A. boehmei
should be considered a junior synonym of C. stoliczkai
(see Discussion).
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 152
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Figure 1. Cyrtopodion stoliczkai (Steindachner, 1867) -
dorsal and ventral views of adult (UF 81349) and
subadult specimen (UF 81334) similar in size to holo-
type of Alsophylax ( Altiphylax ) boehmei (Szczerbak,
1991); both specimens collected near Skardu Airport,
ca. 10 km. west of Skardu, FANA, Pakistan.
Cyrtopodion stoliczkai (Steindachner, 1 867)
[Fig. 1; Tables 1,2]
Diagnosis. - Medium-sized geckos (snout-vent length
[SVL] of largest adult = 46.5 mm), tail slightly longer
than body (longest tail = 53.4 mm), SVL/tail length,
mean = 0.854, Standard Deviation [SD] = 0.0455 (n =
11); limbs moderate, hind limb extends to axilla, fore-
limb to near nostril; body and head somewhat dorso-
ventrally compressed. Head moderate (head
length/SVL, mean = 0.267, SD = 0.0267, head
width/head length, mean = 0.696, SD = 0.0370, head
height/head width, mean = 0.593, SD = 0.0546), snout
equal to or slightly longer than distance between eye and
ear. Eye large (eye diameter/eye - nostril, mean = 0.704,
SD = 0.0665); ear rounded to ovate, small, ear diame-
ter/eye diameter, mean = 0.148, SD = 0.0463. Nostril
bordered by rostral, first supralabial, and normally 3
postnasals, occasionally fused to form 2 postnasals or
split into 4 scales, medial postnasal smaller than others,
1 - 2 medial scales between postnasals (lacking in one
specimen), when 2 present, one is often much larger than
the other. Dorsal head scales generally homogeneous in
size and shape, slightly larger on snout; 17-20 interor-
bital scales; loreals often with small projections on pos-
terior half of eye; rostral partially cleft; 9-11 supralabi-
als (12 on right side of one specimen), 7-9 inffalabials.
Mental triangular, longer than broad. 3 pairs of post-
mentals (rarely 2), decreasing in size posteriorly, first
pair in contact, with a broad suture; second pair rarely
disproportionate in size; third pair often variable in size,
may be substantially enlarged on one side, often separat-
ed from inffalabials by a series of small scales. Dorsum
of body and limbs with small roundish, beaded to flat
scales intermixed with larger, roundish tubercles; tuber-
cles surrounded by rosettes of 7 - 9 small scales, 2-3
times larger than granular scales, smooth, flat to round-
ed, sometimes indistinctly keeled, slightly conical later-
ally; arranged in 8 - 10 (rarely 12) longitudinal rows, lat-
eral rows indistinct. Lateral fold indistinct, often absent.
Venter with roundish, slightly imbricate scales, 25-31
across middle of belly; 113 - 135 from postmentals to
cloaca. Preanal and femoral pores absent. Femoral
spines absent. Cloacal spines present, 1 - 2 per side.
Digits moderate, subdigital lamellae well-developed,
nearly as broad as digit, 1 6 - 20 on fourth finger, 10-12
on first toe, 19-27 on fourth toe. Tail dorso-ventrally
compressed on anterior two-thirds, round on posterior
one-third; anterior half with dorsal medial groove; ante-
rior half distinctly segmented, swollen and lobed lateral-
ly in adults, less so in subadults and juveniles, tapering
to point; 5 whorls on anterior one-third on tail; each seg-
ment on anterior half with one enlarged dorso-lateral
tubercle and 2 - 3 enlarged, bluntly conical lateral tuber-
cles per side, medial tubercles largest; tubercles reduced
in size and number (2) distally, indistinct or absent on
posterior one-third; 6 - 7 rows of scales per whorl, ter-
minal row not enlarged, squared-off posteriorly, not
acuminate or keeled; 2 series of small subcaudals,
cycloid, not greatly enlarged transversely, only about
twice as large as adjacent scales, separated by medial
groove on anterior half to two-thirds of tail; regenerated
tail without segments and lobes, uniformly covered in
small flattened scales.
Dorsal ground color light to medium gray with 7 -
10 irregular transverse darker gray bands, with even
darker posterior margins; 1 on occipital area, 1 on nape,
and 5 - 8 on body; 10 - 15 on tail; limbs with short gray-
ish bands; grayish-brown band from nostril through eye;
top of head irregularly mottled; labials with dark speck-
les; venter whitish.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 153
Table 1. Morphological Characters examined for
Cyrtopodion stoliczkai from Pakistan. See text for character
descriptions.
1. Number of post-nasals
2. Number of medial scales between post-nasals
3. Number of supralabials
4. Number of infralabials
5. Number of interorbitals
6. Number of scales surrounding dorsal tubercle (ran-
domly counted 5 tubercles)
7. Number of scales between postmentals and cloaca
8. Number subdigital lamellae on fourth toe
9. Number of pairs of postmentals
10. Number of whorls on anterior one-third of tail
11. Number of large, lateral tubercles on each tail whorl
12. Number of color bands on head, nape, body, and tail
13. Number of scales between eye and ear (left side only)
14. Number of longitudinal rows of tubercles
15. Number of transverse rows of ventral scales at mid-
body
16. Number of subdigital lamellae on first toe
17. Presence (+) and number of cloacal spines
18. Number of scale rows per tail whorl (max. 8 whorls
counted)
19. Number of subdigital lamallae on fourth finger
20. First pair of postmentals in contact (+) or not in con-
tact (-)
21. Scales on top of head homogeneous in size (+) or not
homogeneous in size (-)
22. Dorsal tubercles present (+) or absent (-)
23. Mental triangular (+) or not triangular (-)
24. Tail whorls distinct (+) or indistinct (-)
25. Preanal pores present (+) or absent (-)
26. Color pattern of dorsum banded (+) or not banded (-)
27. Color band from nostril through eye to nape present
(+) or absent (-)
28. Femoral spines present (+) or absent (-)
29. Femoral pores present (+) or absent (-)
30. Enlarged tubercles on limbs present (+) or absent (-)
31. Roundish dorsal tubercles present (+) or absent (-)
32. Dorsal tubercle sculpture rounded (+) or not rounded
(-)
33. Medial subcaudals in series (+) or not in series (-)
34. Distal scale row of tail whorl enlarged (+) or not
enlarged (-)
35. Tail dorsoventrally compressed (+) or not compressed
(-)
36. Snout-vent length (SVL)
37. Tail length
38. Head length
39. Head width
40. Head height
41. Nostril-eye distance
42. Eye-ear distance
43. Eye diameter
44. Ear diameter
Distribution. - Cyrtopodion stoliczkai has been record-
ed from various localities (see references cited herein)
in the upper Indus River valley ranging from Leh,
Kashmir to Skardu, Pakistan, a distance of almost 300
km by air (Fig. 2). This species was collected in the
Kargil vicinity in Kashmir along one of the many tribu-
taries of the upper Indus River and may occur in other
associated river valleys as well. The Shyok River, a
large tributary draining areas to the north of the Indus
River, remains virtually unexplored. The Indus River
enters a series of gorges west of Skardu, which may
impede dispersal in that direction.
Habitat. - Cyrtopodion stoliczkai occurs in the Pamir-
Karakorum Highlands region of northern Pakistan and
adjacent Kashmir at elevations from 2300 to 3700 m.
Vegetation is sparse in this region, being generally con-
fined to human occupation sites, seeps, streams, and
forested valleys. The intervening barren landscape is
characterized by stark and steep mountainsides, rock
and boulder fields, and large areas of clay, caliche, and
sand. This species has not been collected from human
habitations. Some individuals from the large series col-
lected by Stoliczka during the Second Yarkand
Expedition were found under stones (Blanford, 1878).
Gruber (1981) collected most of his series in rocky
habitats, although one specimen was found in a small
hole in a willow tree. Our series was collected from
small cracks and fissures between slabs of caliche (see
above).
Reproduction. - In the vicinity of Skardu, hatching
occurs in mid to late August. In addition to several new-
borns, three full-term eggs (UF 81352) were collected in
a cavity between slabs of caliche on 29 August 1991.
Although collected together, it is unknown if these rep-
resent a single clutch or communal oviposition site. Egg
measurements range from 9.7 - 11.1 mm in length and
7.6 - 8.5 mm in width.
Discussion
The assignment of the species epithet " stoliczkai " to the
genus Cyrtopodion Fitzinger, 1843 is arbitrary. The
generic assignments of the angular-toed geckos of
South and Central Asia have undergone a great deal of
revision over the last few decades (see Anderson, 1999
for a synopsis of the nomenclature history). In this
paper we follow the simplified arrangement presented
by Anderson (1999) on Iranian species of this group, as
we assign all Pakistan species of angular-toed geckos to
the genus Cyrtopodion. We also find it prudent, consid-
ering the current taxonomic confusion, not to allocate
subgenera. Cyrtopodion stoliczkai is presently not
Vol. 10, p. 154
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
c
<1)
~o
co
0
co
c
0
E
o
0
Cl
CO
"to
TO
-C
0
o
CO
c
o
o
CO
0
"O
0
O
TO
i_
TO
.c
o
0
-Q
|2
"D
C
TO
-4—*
X
0
-4—*
0
0
CD
c
TO
CO
lx
TO
Q_
E
o
TO
-X
2
CO
C
.o
■Q
o
i*
O 2
Jr LL-
O N
_co
c
15
O
o
J0
8 c
co .c
X
CO
0
CO
TO
CM ll
0 Z)
CM
o
CM
05
CO
CO
CO
CM
CD
CO
.TO
0
CO
tf)
CO
CM
c
0
E
o
0
a
c/)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
0)N0)C0C0C0N05C0C0C0N050)00C0C0NCDO00C0O05ffl^
O)0O5ro©racDo5o5o)oococoo5oooocoNoocooocoooroZ
i CD i -i i i i i i i CD i i CD CD
CD CD2.CDCDCDCOCDCD CDCD
Ot-t-Ot-CNOOOO
T— T— T— T— T— T— T— T— T— T—
O^OO^OJOOOO
o o o o o o
0 0 0 0^0
z
NNNN00N0N0NSNN0001D00I CDI CDCD<
OCNJO<CO<iOt-<<LO<<-M-<<CO<COCM<<CO<<C\J
lOCDlOiotDi?5^5$CDCD^DcDi?5jpiDCDi£?CDS9S9CDU:529r^CDy2
0^0000000^
200^00000)
O CM
CM CM
o o o o
0^00
CM T- T-
t-t— OOOO O O CM
^^T-^T-r-05T-V-T-ffi
oooo^ooooo^cd
CM CM CM
CM CM
CM
COCOCOCO^COCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCMCOCMCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCO
Table 2. Continued.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 155
CO
CO
CO
CN
CO
CO
o
CO
<7>
CM
CO
CNI
h-
CN
CO
CM
lO
CM
CM
CO
CM
CM
CN
c
Q
E
'o
<D
a
C/5
I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I I I I I I I
i
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
i i i
i i i i
• +
+ + + + + + + + + +2+ + + + + + +z + '
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
^SS^^cOCOCOCOCOCOCOCON-N-N-N-N-N-N'N-N-N-iOini'-
SSSSSS5SSS5555S55oocooococococooooo
Vol. 10, p. 156
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
assigned to a subgenus, but is regarded as a member of
the "Tibeto-Himalayan" group. Our somewhat cursory
examination of other members of this group, including
C. baturensis (Khan, 1992), C. chitralensis (Smith,
1935) (synonymized with C. walli (Ingoldby, 1922) by
Khan, [1992]), and C. mintoni (Golubev and Szczerbak,
1981), clearly shows that this group is highly artificial.
Khan and Rosier (1999) did not consider
Cyrtopodion stoliczkai as a member of the Pakistan
gecko fauna, confining it to the upper Indus River valley
in Kashmir. However, the morphological characters of
our series from Skardu closely match those of Szczerbak
and Golubev (1986, 1996) and Khan and Rosier (1999).
Therefore, C. stoliczkai does indeed occur in Pakistan.
Cyrtopodion stoliczkai (Steindachner, 1867) was
described from a single specimen collected by
Ferdinand Stoliczka in 1865 near Karoo, north of Dras,
in northern Kashmir (Blanford, 1878). Some previous
authors have cited Steindachner (1869) as the original
description, but this actually refers to a reprint of the ear-
lier work (K. Adler, pers. comm.). This single specimen
was subsequently transferred to the Naturhistorisches
Museum, Wien (Vienna, Austria), where Steindachner
designated it as the holotype (NMW 16756) in honor of
its collector. The holotype is well-illustrated by
Szczerbak and Golubev (1986, 1996:Fig. 92). During
the Second Yarkand Expedition (1873 - 1874), Stoliczka
collected an additional 46 specimens from the type
locality and a few localities eastward to Leh in the Indus
River valley of central Ladakh, Kashmir. These speci-
mens were subsequently deposited in the Indian
Museum, Calcutta (Blanford, 1878). Annandale (1913)
enumerated only 31 specimens in the Indian Museum
collections in his treatment of Indian Gymnodactylus.
Zugmayer (1909) and Brongersma (1935) reported this
species from Lamayuru and Leh, respectively, both
localities being in central Ladakh. Gruber (1981) col-
lected 14 specimens from a few localities in the same
general area as Stoliczka in 1865, which were deposited
in the ZSM. Khan and Rosier (1999) presented a
detailed redescription of C. stoliczkai based on this last
series, but were unable to examine the holotype and the
series in the Indian Museum. Khan and Rosier (1999)
erroneously referred to a specimen of C. stoliczkai in the
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 157
Museum of Comparative Zoology (MCZ 7132) as both
a syntype and paratype. This specimen cannot be consid-
ered either, as Steindachner mentioned only one speci-
men in the original description, and Constable (1949:84)
did not provide any type designation for this MCZ spec-
imen. This specimen was received by the MCZ via
exchange with the Indian Museum, Calcutta, in June
1908 (Constable, 1949:61; J. Rosado, pers. comm.).
Stoliczka is given as the collector (Constable, 1949:61).
Stoliczka died in 1874 during the Second Yarkand
Expedition's return to India, indicating that his large
series from Ladakh in the Indian Museum was collected
in 1873 during the outbound portion of the expedition.
We must assume that the MCZ specimen originates from
this large series, however, it is possible that Stoliczka
made additional collections in Ladakh between 1865
and 1873. Nevertheless, it is clear that Steindachner
(1867) examined only one specimen at the time C.
stoliczkai was described and the MCZ specimen cannot
be a type. Additionally, Khan and Rosier (1999) referred
to MCZ 7132 as a topotype. This may or may not be cor-
rect, as Stoliczka's journal from the Second Yarkand
Expedition indicated that only some of his specimens
were collected at the type locality (Blanford, 1878) and
others were collected elsewhere. However, since the
only locality information available for the MCZ speci-
men is "Ladakh", it cannot be ascertained that it is actu-
ally one of the specimens collected at the type locality.
Gymnodactylus walli Ingoldby, 1922 and G. yarkan-
densis Anderson, 1872 were regarded as synonyms of
Cyrtopodion stoliczkai by Smith (1935), a view fol-
lowed by virtually all subsequent authors. Minton
(1966) referred to a single specimen from Udigram,
Swat District, Northwest Frontier Province, Pakistan as
C. stoliczkai , which was later found to be a distinct
species (Mertens, 1969:26; Khan, 1980:14; described as
Gymnodactylus mintoni by Golubev and Szczerbak in
1981). Khan (1992) produced a compelling argument to
consider Cyrtopodion walli distinct from C. stoliczkai
based on an examination of the type specimens in the
British Musuem. We are unable to resolve the synonymy
of C. yarkandensis (Anderson, 1872). Blanford (1878)
relegated C. yarkandensis to the synonymy of C.
stoliczkai (Steindachner, 1 867), and subsequent authors
followed this view (Annandale, 1913; Boulenger, 1890;
Kluge, 1991, 1993, 2001; Mertens, 1969; Minton, 1966;
Smith, 1935; Szczerbak and Golubev, 1986, 1996;
Wermuth, 1965; Zhao and Adler, 1993). Khan (1994)
resurrected C. yarkandensis based on an examination of
a single specimen housed in the British Museum
(BMNH 72.3.22.4). A comparison of color transparen-
cies taken during a study of the same specimen by W.
Auffenberg in the early 1990s, along with our series
from Skardu, indicate that this specimen is probably best
assigned to C. stoliczkai. However, important morpho-
logical characters cannot be ascertained from the trans-
parencies or Khan's (1994) description. Szczerbak and
Golubev (1986, 1996) also assigned this specimen to C.
stoliczkai. Whether C. yarkandensis is a distinct taxon
or a synonym of C. stoliczkai can be determined only
with a thorough examination of the types housed in the
Indian Museum, Calcutta. We provide the following
notes on C. yarkandensis at this point merely for a his-
torical perspective.
Anderson (1872) mentioned two specimens in his
description of Cyrtodactylus yarkandensis. These were
supposedly collected in Yarkand (= Shache, Xinjiang,
China; Zhao and Adler, 1993) during the First Yarkand
Expedition in 1870 (Blanford, 1878). This locality was
doubted by Blanford (1878:12-13), maintaining that the
types of C. yarkandensis were identical to the C.
stoliczkai specimens collected by Stoliczka during the
Second Yarkand Expedition in Ladakh, some of which
were taken from the type locality of C. stoliczkai.
Blanford (1878:13) stated "The specimens described by
Dr. Anderson as Cyrtodactylus yarkandensis were
brought, with others, by a collector, who accompanied
Dr. Henderson on the mission which was sent to
Yarkand in 1870; this mission traversed precisely the
same route through Kashmir and Leh as the second in
1 873 - 74, and I do not think there can be any reasonable
doubt that the real locality whence Cyrtodactylus
yarkandensis was obtained must have been Ladak, and
not Yarkand." Annandale (1913:316) incorrectly attrib-
uted the collection of the types of C. yarkandensis to
Stoliczka during the Second Yarkand Expedition. That
mission embarked in 1873, about one year after
Anderson's (1872) description of C. yarkandensis. Khan
(1994) referred to this specimen (BMNH 72.3.22.4;
"Yarkhand") as a syntype. The specimen catalogue at the
British Museum indicates that this specimen was
"Presented by [the] Indian Museum Calcutta through Dr.
Anderson" and cataloged on March 22, 1872 (C.
McCarthy, pers. comm.), the same year the species was
described. Anderson (1872:381) mentioned only two
specimens in the original description and Annandale
(1913:316) referred to two specimens (ZSI 3792 - 93) as
types of C. yarkandensis (as a synonym of
Gymnodactylus stoliczkai Steindachner) in the Indian
Museum, Calcutta. It can be assumed that these were the
specimens on which Anderson based his description,
thus the status of the British Museum specimen remains
nebulous.
Alsophylax ( Altiphylax ) boehmei Szczerbak, 1991
was described from two specimens collected by G.
Osella from Skardu, Pakistan in July 1976. Although we
did not examine the holotype, we have no doubt that the
description of this species is based on subadult
Vol. 10, p. 158
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Cyrtopodion stoliczkai. This relationship was originally
suggested by Golubev (in Szczerbak and Golubev,
1996:200, footnote). Morphological characters for A.
boehmei provided by Szczerbak (1991) fall within the
range of variation in those we recorded for C. stoliczkai
(Table 1). The holotype (ZFMK 38773, see Fig. 3 in
Szczerbak, 1991) matches the subadults in our complete
growth series collected in Skardu in 1991 (Table 2). The
whorls of the anterior third of the tail of C. stoliczkai do
not become swollen and lobed until maturity, but
Szczerbak (1991) lacked a sufficient series of specimens
to make this determination.
Golubev (in Szczerbak and Golubev, 1996:200,
footnote) also suggested that Tenuidactylus baturensis
Khan and Baig, 1992 may also be conspecific with
Cyrtopodion stoliczkai. Our examination of one speci-
men collected near the type locality of T. baturensis indi-
cates that although it is similar in overall morphology,
this species appears to be distinct.
Khan (200 1 ) divided the Tibeto - Himalayan group
of Cyrtopodion into three subgroups: Stoliczkai sub-
group = C. baturensis (Khan and Baig, 1992), C.
stoliczkai (Steindachner, 1867), and C. yarkandensis
(Anderson, 1872); Tibetinus subgroup = C. battalensis
(Khan, 1993), C. dattanensis (Khan, 1980), C.
himalayanus (Duda and Sahi, 1978), C. mintoni
(Golubev and Szczerbak, 1981), and C. tibetinus
(Boulenger, 1905); and the Walli subgroup - C. walli
(Ingoldby, 1922) (including C. chitralensis [Smith,
1935] as a synonym) and C. kirmanense (Nikolsky,
1900). Our preliminary examination of most of these
taxa reveals that Khan's system has merit concerning
overall morphological and ecological data. Further
investigations into the Pakistan gecko fauna and that of
adjacent areas will undoubtedly lead to further discover-
ies of new species and more clearly define those already
described.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the Division of International
Conservation, United States Fish and Wildlife Service
(Washington, D. C.), Deutscher Akademischer
Austauschdienst, Bonn, Germany, and the Office of
Sponsored Research, University of Florida for the fund-
ing support awarded to W. Auffenberg that made possi-
ble the fieldwork and museum visits by him. We also
thank Kraig Adler (CU), Steve Anderson (University of
the Pacific), M. S. Khan (Secane, Pennsylvania), Arnold
Kluge (UMMZ), Colin McCarthy (BMNH), and Jose
Rosado (MCZ) for pertinent literature, insight, and the
examination of specimens under their care. We also rec-
ognize Max Nickerson and Wayne King (Florida
Museum of Natural History) for their encouragement
and support. Tammy Johnson prepared Fig. 2. We thank
the dedicated staff of the Zoological Survey Department
of Pakistan, particularly Mohammad Farooq Ahmed,
former Director, Hafizur Rehman, Shamim Fakhri, and
Aleem Khan, for their support and assistance throughout
the fieldwork portion of this project.
Literature Cited
Anderson, J. 1872. On some Persian, Himalayan, and
other reptiles. Proceedings of the Zoological
Society of London 1872(2):37 1-404.
Anderson, S. C. 1999. The Lizards of Iran. Society for
the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Ithaca, NY.
pp. 442.
Annandale, N. 1913. The Indian geckos of the genus
Gymnodactylus. Records of the Indian Museum
9:309-326, pis. 16-17.
Blanford, W. T. 1878. Scientific results of the Second
Yarkand Mission; based on the collections and
notes of the late Ferdinand Stoliczka, Ph.D. Reptilia
and Amphibia, Calcutta, 26 pp.
Boulenger, G. A. 1890. The Fauna of British India,
including Ceylon and Burma. Reptilia and
Batrachia. Taylor and Francis, London, xviii + 541
pp.
Boulenger, G. A. 1905. On some batrachians and reptiles
from Tibet. Annals and Magazine of Natural
History (7th series) 11:379-380.
Brongersma, L. D. 1935. Amphibien und Reptilien. Pp.
446-451. In Visser (ed.), Karakorum I. Wissensch-
aftliche Ergebnisse der Niederlandischer
Expeditionen in den Karakorum und die
angrennzenden Gebiete 1922, 1925 und 1929/30.
Brockhaus, Leipzig.
Constable, J. D. 1949. Reptiles from the Indian penins-
ula in the Museum of Comparative Zoology.
Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology
1 03(2):59- 1 60.
Duda, P. L. and D. N. Sahi. 1978. Cyrtodactylus
himalayanus: A new gekkonid species from Jammu,
India. Journal of Herpetology 12(3):35 1-354.
Fitzinger, L. J. 1843. Systema reptilium. Fasciculus
Primus: Amblyglossae (Conspectus Geographicus).
Braumuller und Seidel, Vienna, iv + 106 pp.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 159
(Reprint 1973 Society tor the Study of Amphibians
and Reptiles, Ithaca, New York).
Golubev, M. L. and N. N. Szczerbak. 1981. [A new
species of the genus Gymnodactylus Spix, 1823
(Reptilia, Sauria, Gekkonidae)]. Vestnik Zoologii
198 1(3):40-45. (In Russian).
Gruber, U. 1981. Notes on the herpetofauna of Kashmir
and Ladakh. British Journal of Herpetology 6:145-
150.
Ingoldby, C. M. 1922. A new stone gecko from the
Himalaya. Journal of the Bombay Natural History
Society 28:1051.
Khan, M. S. 1980. A new species of gecko from north-
ern Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Zoology
12(1): 11-16.
Khan, M. S. 1992. Validity of the mountain gecko
Gymnodactylus walli Ingoldby, 1922.
Herpetological Journal 2:106-109.
Khan, M. S. 1993. A new angular-toed gecko from
Pakistan, with remarks on the taxonomy and a key
to the species belonging to genus Cyrtodactylus
(Reptilia: Sauria: Geckkonidae). Pakistan Journal of
Zoology 25(l):67-73.
Khan, M. S. 1994. Validity and redescription of
Tenuidactylus yarkandensis (J. Anderson, 1872).
Pakistan Journal of Zoology 26(2): 139-143.
Khan, M. S. 2001. Taxonomic notes on angular-toed
Gekkota of Pakistan, with description of a new
species of genus Cyrtopodion. Pakistan Journal of
Zoology 33(1): 13-24.
Khan, M. S. and K. J. Baig. 1992. A new Tenuidactylus
gecko from northeastern Gilgit Agency, North
Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 24(4):273-
277.
Khan, M. S. and H. Rosier. 1999. Redescription and
generic redesignation of the Ladakhian gecko
Gymnodactylus stoliczkai Steindachner, 1969 [sic],
Asiatic Herpetological Research 8:60-68.
Kluge, A. G. 1991. Checklist of gekkonid lizards.
Smithsonian Herpetological Information Service
85:1-35.
Kluge, A. G. 1993. Gekkonoid Lizard Taxonomy.
International Gecko Society, San Diego, 245 pp.
Kluge, A. G. 2001. Gekkotan Lizard Taxonomy.
Hamadryad, Special Publication 26(1): 1-209.
Leviton, A. E., R. H. Gibbs, Jr., E. Heal, and C. E.
Dawson. 1985. Standards in herpetology and
ichthyology: Part I. Standard symbolic codes for
institutional resource collections in herpetology and
ichthyology. Copeia 1985:802-832.
Mertens, R. 1969. Die Amphibien und Reptilien West-
Pakistans. Stuttgarter Beitrage zur Naturkunde
197:1-96.
Minton, S. A., Jr. 1966. A contribution to the herpeto-
logy of West Pakistan. Bulletin of the American
Museum of Natural History 1 34(2):29- 1 84.
Nikolsky, A. M. 1899 [1900]. Reptiles, amphibiens et
poissons, recueillis pendant la voyage de Mr. N. A.
Zarudny en 1 898 dans la Perse. Annuaire du Musee
Zoologique de l'Academie Imperiale des Sciences
de St. Petersbourg, 4:375-417. (In Russian).
Smith, M. A. 1935. The Fauna of British India,
Including Ceylon and Burma. Reptilia and
Amphibia, vol. 2, Sauria. Taylor and Francis,
London, xiii + 440 pp.
Steindachner, F. 1867. Reptilia. In: F. Steindachner (ed.)
Reise der Osterreichischen Fregatte Novara um die
Erde in den Jahren 1857, 1858, 1859 unter den
Befehlen des Commodore B. von Wullerstorf-
Urbair, Zoology, vol. 1, part 3. Kaiserlich-
Koniglichen Hof-Staatsdruckerei, Vienna, 98 pp..
Steindachner, F. 1869. Reptilia. In: F. Steindachner (ed.)
Reise der Osterreichischen Fregatte Novara um die
Erde in den Jahren 1857, 1858, 1859 unter den
Befehlen des Commodore B. von Wullerstorf-
Urbair, Zoology, vol. 1, part 3. Kaiserlich-
Koniglichen Hof-Staatsdruckerei, Vienna, 98 pp., 3
pis. (Reprint of 1867 Edition).
Szczerbak, N. N. 1991. Eine neue Gecko-Art aus
Pakistan: Alsophylax ( Altiphylax ) boehmei sp. nov.
Salamandra 27(l):53-57.
Szczerbak, N. N. and M. L. Golubev. 1986. [Gecko
Fauna of the USSR and Adjacent Regions]. Nauka
Dymka, Kiev, 232 pp. (In Russian).
Szczerbak, N. N. and M. L. Golubev. 1996. Gecko
Fauna of the USSR and Adjacent Regions. [English
edition translated from the Russian by M. L.
Golubev and S. A. Malinsky; A. E. Leviton and G.
Vol. 10, p. 160
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
R. Zug, eds.]. Society for the Study of Amphibians
and Reptiles, Ithaca, New York, 232 pp.
Wermuth, H. 1965. Liste der rezenten Amphibien und
Reptilien: Gekkonidae, Pygopodidae, Xantusidae.
Das Tierreich 80:xxiv + 246 pp.
Zhao, E. and K. K. Adler. 1993. Herpetology of China.
Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles,
Oxford, Ohio, 522 pp.
Zugmayer, E. 1909. Beitrage zur Herpetologie von
Zentral-Asien. Zoologischen Jarhbuchem
27(5):481-508.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol.10, pp. 161-163
Antimicrobial Activity in the Skin Secretion of Bufo viridis (Laurenti, 1768)
Ba§aran Dulger1’*, Ismail Hakki Ugurta§2, and Murat Sevinc2
Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Faculty of Science & Arts, Department of Biology, C an akkal e-Turkey
2
Uludag University, Faculty of Science & Arts, Department of Biology, Bursa-Turkey
*
Correspondence author, E-mail: dbasaran@comu.edu.tr; Fax number: +90.286.2 180533
Abstract. - In this study, antimicrobial activity of various extracts prepared from Bufo viridis skin secretion were
tested against the microorganisms by disk diffusion method. Escherichia coli ATTC 10536, Listeria monocytogenes
ATCC 19117, Klebsiella pneumoniae UC57, Salmonella typhi ATCC 19430, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538P,
Mycobacterium smegmatis CCM 2067, Rhodotorula rubra and Saccharomyces cerevisae ATCC 9763 were used.
According to our results, the extracts prepared from Bufo viridis skin secretion have high antimicrobial activity
against the tested microorganisms.
Keywords. - Bufo viridis, Amphibia, antimicrobial activity, skin secretion.
Introduction
Amphibians have skin glands producing mucous and
poison. Amphibians have been studied and have
attracted special attention from a toxicological point of
view. Various substances with antimicrobial activity
have been isolated from skin secretions of amphibian
species (Dapson, 1970; Croce et al., 1973; Dapson et al.,
1973; Preusser et al., 1975; Cevikbas, 1978). Several
toxins in amphibian poisons have been used as experi-
mental tools and contributed to significant progress in
physiology. Some toxins (Batrachotoxins) specifically
block the inactivation of the voltage regulated Na+ chan-
nels in nerve and muscle cells, which causes a massive
inflow of Na+. The cells become irreversibly depolar-
ized, which, among other things, produces heart arrhyth-
mia and respiratory failure and finally cardiac
insufficiency. In humans, some amphibian toxins (Bufo-
tenin) produce symptoms similar to those of LSD (Lutz,
1971; Edstrom, 1992). In previous studies, some skin
secretions showed remarkable cytotoxic activity against
eukaryotic cells (Kolbe et al., 1993; Sanna et al. 1993).
The aim of the this study is to test the antimicrobial
activity of Bufo viridis skin secretions against Gram-
positive, Gram-negative bacteria and yeast cultures for
future possible use in providing pharmacological tools
for the study of new drugs and aid in benefitting human
health.
Materials and Methods
Specimens of Bufo viridis were collected from different
regions in Bursa, Turkey in March 1998. Collected frogs
were brought to the laboratory and kept in an aquarium.
Before experimentation, the frogs were washed first
with tap water and then with distilled water. They were
placed for 3-5 minutes in a glass jar containing a piece
of cotton soaked with ether to stimulate skin secretions.
The secretion accumulated on the skin was obtained by
scraping the body of the animals with a spatula. The
foamy secretion thus obtained was placed in a tube, left
in an 80°C water bath for 30 min and centrifuged at
5,500 rev/min for 30 min. After centrifugation, the pre-
cipitate was used in the experiments. Before using in the
experiments, the precipitate was diluted with distilled
water 0.1 M HC1, 0.1 M NH4OH, and 1 M phosphate
buffers (pH: 4 and pH: 7).
In this study, Escherichia coli ATTC 10536, Liste-
ria monocytogenes ATCC 19117, Klebsiella pneumo-
niae UC57, Salmonella typhi ATCC 19430,
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 653 8P, Mycobacterium
smegmatis CCM 2067 bacteria cultures and Rhodot-
orula rubra and Saccharomyces cerevisae ATCC 9763
yeast cultures were used.
In vitro antimicrobial activity studies were carried
out by the Agar-Disc Diffusion Method. Mueller Hinton
Agar (Oxoid) was preferred as the most suitable
medium for antimicrobial activity studies. Each extract
was implemented into a sterile disc in varying concen-
trations starting from 20 pi. Each disc was 6 mm in
diameter.
Bacteria and yeast cultures were suspended in 4-5
ml Brain Heart Infusion Broth (Oxoid) and Malt Extract
Broth (Difco). Bacteria were incubated in 37°C for 2-5
hours. Yeast cultures were incubated in 30°C for 5-7
hours. A visible turbidity was obtained at the end of this
time. The turbidity of bacterial suspension was adjusted
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol.10, p. 162
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Table 1. Antimicrobial activity of various extracts of Bufo viridis skin secretions on microorganisms.
(+) : Inhibition zone less than 1 mm surrounding the 6 mm paper disk.
+ : Inhibition less than
++ : Inhibition comparable to
+++: Inhibition more than 10 pg penicillin or sulconazole / disk; Inhibition zones of references : 12-16 mm diameter.
according to Macfarland Standard Tube [0,5] with phys-
iologic serum and inoculation performed. Prepared bac-
terial suspension was mixed with a sterile applicator and
excess fluid of applicator was removed by rotating the
applicator to one side of the tube. We streaked the entire
Mueller Hinton Agar surface in three different direc-
tions by rotating the plate 60° angles after each streak-
ing. Yeast cultures were inoculated into Muller Hinton
Agar (102 cfu/ml). All petri dishes after inoculation were
allowed to dry for 15-20 min at room temperature (bac-
teria at 35°C and yeast at 30°C). Inhibition zone diame-
ters were measured after 24-48 hours (Collins et al.
1987, NCCLS 1993). In addition, continued only sol-
vent was used as negative control disc and antibiotic
penicillin and sulcanozole discs were used as references.
Experiments were repeated three times and results were
expressed as average values.
Results and Discussion
Antimicrobial activity effects of five different extracts,
which were prepared by using distilled water, 0.1 N
HC1, 0.1 N NH4OH, 1 M phosphate buffers (pH: 4 and
pH: 7), were obtained from the skin secretions of Bufo
viridis against bacteria and yeast cultures, results are
given in Table 1.
According to our findings, all the extracts of skin
secretion against the yeast cultures exhibit higher anti-
microbial activity than that of a compared antibiotic.
The 0.1 M HC1 extract shows more effect than that of
the other extracts against bacteria. 1 M phosphate buffer
(pH: 4 and 7) extracts exhibited minor effects against
Escherichia coli. However, phosphate buffer (pH: 4 and
7) extracts exhibited strong effects against the other bac-
teria. It can be said that the active substance obtained
from Bufo viridis skin secretion dissolves easily in the
0.1 M HC1 and has high antimicrobial activity as a con-
sequence. It has been reported that sensitivity of the
microorganisms to the chemotherapeutic agents
changes from strain to strain (Cetin et al., 1989). Our
results are in agreement with the other authors’ results.
Inhibition zone diameters around the control disc
were measured as 0-1 mm. In this study, antimicrobial
effects of the prepared extracts on the tested microor-
ganisms were determined by using different solvents.
Croce et al. (1973) investigated antimicrobial activ-
ity of skin secretions from Bombina variegata pachy-
pus. They homogenized skin secretion with phosphate
buffers (pH: 4 and 7) 1 M HC1, 1 M NH4OH and dis-
tilled water. These homogenates show high antimicro-
bial activity against Staphylococcus aureus but they do
not show any antimicrobial effect against Aspergillus
niger, Trichophyton mentagrophytes ATCC 8757 and
Candida albicans.
Cevikbas (1978) examined antibacterial activity in
the skin secretions of Rana ridibunda. The author
reported that skin secretion of Rana ridibunda shows
antibacterial activity at different levels. However, in our
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol.10, p. 163
piesent study, skin secretions of Bufo viridis against the
yeast cultures shows more antimicrobial activity than
that of the bacterial cultures. Our findings parallel those
reported in the above studies. In Amphibia, antimicro-
bial activity of skin secretions differ at both the generic
and specific levels.
Although the antimicrobial activity of skin secre-
tions from Bufo viridis , Bufo vulgaris , Salamandra mac-
ulosa and Salamandra atra were determined (Pavan,
1962; Pavan and Nascimbene, 1948), antimicrobial
activity ot skin secretion from Bufo marinus, Triturus,
and Xenopus were not observed (Preusser et al., 1975;
Kolbe et al., 1993; Ozeti and Yilmaz, 1994). Antiyeast
activity observed in our study was not observed in
Croce’s et al. study (1973). Our results show that skin
secretion components from Bufo viridis may be different
from Bombina variegata pachymus.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Aegean University, Science
Faculty, Department of Biology, and Basic and Indus-
trial Microbiology for supplying the strain of microor-
ganism used in the study.
References
Cetin, T. E. and N. Gurler. 1989. Bakterilerin Antibiyo-
tiklere Duyarlilik Deneyinin Yapilmasi. Kukem
12:2-5.
Cevikbas, A. 1978. Antibacterial activity in the skin
secretion of the frog Rana ridibunda. Toxicon
16(2): 195-197.
Collins, C. M., P. M. Lyne, and J. M. Grange. 1989.
Microbiological Methods, Six Edition. Butter-
worths & Co. Ltd., London. 410 pp.
Croce, R., N. Giglioli, and L. Bolognani. 1973. Antimi-
crobial activity in the skin secretions of Bombina
variegata pachymus. Toxicon 1 1 :99-100.
Edstrom, A. 1992. Venomous and Poisonous Animals.
Kriger Publishing Company. Malabar, Florida.
USA. 226 pp.
Kolbe, FI. V. L, A. Fluber, P. Cordier, U. B. Rasmussen,
B. Bouchon, M. Jaqunod, R. Vlasak, E. Delot, and
G. Kreil. 1993. Xenoxins: A Family Of Peptides
From Dorsal Gland Secretion Of Xenopus laevis
Related To Snake- Venom Cytotoxins And Neuro-
toxins. Journal of Biological Chemistry
268(22): 16458-16464.
Lutz, B. 1971. Venomous Animals and Their Venom.
Academic Press, London. 423-427 pp.
NCCLS. 1993. Performance Standards for Antimicro-
bial Disk susceptibility Tests. Approved Standard
NCCLS publication M2- A5, Villanova, PA, USA.
Ozeti, N. and F Yilmaz. 1994. [Amphibians of Turkey].
Aegean University Press, Izmir. 151 pp.
Pavan, M., 1962. Die Antibiotica tierischer Herkunft.
Zeitschrift Fur Hygiene und Infektionskrankheiten
34:136-138.
Pavan, M., and A. Nascimbene. 1948. Studi sugli antibi-
otici di origine animale. Bolletino Societa Medico-
chirurgica, Pavia 1-2:229.
Preusser, H. J., G. Habermehl, M. Sablofski, and H. D.
Schmall. 1975. Antimicrobial activity of alkoloid
from amphibian venoms and effects on the ultras-
tucture of yeast cells. Toxicon 12: 285.
Sanna, A. P., A. Bamabei, and G. Delfino. 1993. The
Cutaneous Venom of Bombina orientals : Cytotoxic
Effects on the human HL 60 Cell Line and A Com-
parison with Bombina variegata. Journal of Natural
Toxins 2(2): 16 1-173.
Analysis of the Stomach Contents of the Lycian Salamander
Mertensiella luschani (Steindachner, 1891)
(Urodela: Salamandridae), Collected from Southwest Turkey
Serdar Du§en, Mehmet Oz, and M. Rizvan Tunc
Akdeniz University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Biology,
07058, Antalya, Turkey
Abstract. - In this paper, the stomach contents of 116 specimens (39 males, 47 females, and 30 juveniles) from the
Southwest Turkey Mertensiella luschani populations are analyzed. A total of 342 prey items were identified and their
frequency of occurence and percent of diet were tabulated. The majority of the diet consisted of Insecta (50.58%),
and within Insecta, Coleoptera (65.32%) was the major order represented. In addition to insects, M. luschani feeds on
Gastropoda (19.59%), Arachnida (16.08%), Myriapoda (8.57%), Clitelliata (3.50%) and Crustacea (1.75%).
Key words. - Mertensiella luschani , stomach contents, prey, southwest Turkey.
Baran and Atatiir, 1980, M. 1. billae Franzen and Kle-
wen, 1987, and M. 1. flavimembris Mutz and Steinfartz,
1995. Mertensiella luschani is not dependent on water,
it inhabits humid soils and crevices under the Pinus bru-
tia forests, Mediterranean maquis, and open rocky
areas. Its vertical distribution ranges between 15-1300
m.
Various studies have been done on M. luschani in
terms of its taxonomy (Franzen et all, 2001), ecology
(Klewen, 1991; Steinfartz and Mutz, 1998), and repro-
ductive biology (Ozeti, 1973; Ozeti, 1980). The aim of
Figure 1. Collecting localities of Mertensiella luschani in Southwest Turkey. 1-Kocagol, 2-Dodurga, 3- Letoon, 4-Nadar
lar, 5-Finike, 6-Buyukgaltlcak, 7-Hurma, 8-Fersin
Introduction
Nine subspecies of the Lycian Salamander, Mertensiella
luschani, are distibuted along the coast of Southwestern
Turkey and on some islands (e.g., Kastellorizon, Meis,
Kekova, and Karpathos) (Baran and Atatiir, 1997; Ba^-
oglu et al., 1994; Veith et ah, 2001). These are M. 1. lus-
chani Steindachner, 1891, M. 1. helverseni Pieper, 1963,
M. 1. atifi Ba?oglu, 1967, M. l.fazilae Ba^oglu and Atat-
ur, 1974, M. l.finikensis Ba^oglu and Atatiir, 1975, M. 1.
antalyana Ba^oglu and Baran, 1976, M. 1. basoglui
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol.10, p. 165
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Table 1. Composition of the stomach contents of Mertensiella luschani (39 males, 47 females, 30 juve-
niles) collected from the Southwest Turkey. N: The numbers of every prey found in all stomachs, n: The
number of stomachs every prey type was found in.
2004
Vol.10, p. 166
Hvmenoptera 1 7 . 92%
Dermaptera 4.62%
Heteroptera 4.05%
.Lepidoptera 2.89%
■ Collembola 2.31 %
- Diptera 1.73%
Others 1.16%
- Coleoptera 65.32%
Figure 2. Distribution of the insect groups in numerical
percentages.
the present preliminary investigation on seven M. lus-
chani subspecies (except M /. flavimembris and M. I
helverseni ) from eight localities in Southwest Turkey is
an analysis of stomach contents.
Materials and Methods
Specimens for this study were collected from the eight
localities in Southwest Turkey during the known activ-
ity period of M. luschani (December-February, 1999). A
total 116 (39 males, 47 females, and 30 juveniles) M
luschani specimens were collected by hand under
stones. Collection sites are shown in Figure 1.
Once collected, the salamanders were taken to the
laboratory to undergo stomach-flushing. A thin pipe
wash bottle is inserted in salamander’s esophagus and
stomach. Gentle pressure on the wash bottle forces dis-
tilled water in to the stomach and forces the food out
throught mouth (modified from Gittins, 1987). The prey
items obtained from each specimen were labeled and
stored in 10 cc. bottles containing 70% ethanol. Dried
pieces from both undigested and partially digested prey
were placed on microscope slides and held in place with
cellophane tape (Du§en and Oz, 2001). These pieces
consisted of whole body, wings, thorax with abdomen,
head, and mouth parts. Through this approach, identifi-
cation to the lowest taxonomic categories was
attempted, samples were examined using a stereomicro-
scope with 10-25x magnification. Prey items were iden-
tified and grouped utilizing methods described
elsewhere (Demirsoy, 1998a,b; Grzimek, 1979a,b,
Lodos, 1986; Riehm, 1984)
Results
We did not observe any significant differences in the
stomach contents of seven subspecies males, females
and juveniles; they were thus evaluated together. Of the
116 specimens (39 males, 47 females, and 30 juveniles),
only two females had empty stomachs. Small unrecog-
nizable insect remains (parts of heads and larvae, anten-
nae, wings, etc.) of the stomach contents are not
included to the numerical analysis. Other non-food
materials such as small pebbles, sand grains, plant parti-
cles, and pieces of feather, possibly ingested during prey
capture were not included either.
A total of 342 prey items were counted from the
investigated stomach contents (Fig. 2); Insecta 173
(50.58%), Gastropoda 67 (19.59%), Arachnida 55
(16.08%), Myriapoda29 (8.57%), Clitelliata 12 (3.50%)
and Crustacea 6 (1.75%). Table 1 presents the stomach
contents with respect to prey groups (their taxonomic
grouping, number of prey items, and percentages of
preyers).
Insects were identified to the ordinal level. The total
number of prey and their percentages are as follow:
coleopters 113 (65.32%), hymenopterans 31 (17.92%),
dermapterans 8 (4.62%), heteropterans 7 (4.05%), lepi-
dopterans 5 (2.89%), dipterans (1.73%), collembolan 4
(2.31%), homopterans 1 (0.57%), and isopterans 1
(0.57%) (Fig. 2). The same insect orders can be ranked
from the viewpoint of the number of prey eaten; their
percentages are as follows: coleopterans 51 (43.96%),
co
i
JD
Q.
O
©
O
O
co
©
o_
o
c
©
E
>.
x
CO
t_
0)
Q_
03
E
©
Q
co
©
Q.
O
T3
Q.
©
CO
i_
©
Q.
0
1
©
©
X
JO
o
-O
E
©
o
O
■ Prey Eater
□ Relative Percentage
CO
L_
0)
Q_
b
CO
<D
Figure 3. Distribution of the insect groups regarding prey eaters.
Vol.10, p. 167
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
hymenopterans 19 (16.37%), dermapterans 8 (6.89%),
heteropterans 6 (5.17%), lepidopterans 5 (4.31%), col-
lembolans 3 (2.58%), dipterans 3 (2.58%), homopterans
1 (0.86%), and isopterans 1 (%0.86) (Fig. 3).
When the prey groups are evaluated by their absolute
values and relative percentages within the food,
coleopterans 51 (43.96%), have the priority. Other con-
sumed invertebrates as follows: Pulmonata 36
(31.03%), Aranae 27 (23.27%), Pseudoscorpion ida 15
(12.93%), Diplopoda 15 (12.93), Clitelliata 9 (7.75%),
Chilopoda 9 (7.75%), and Isopoda 6 (5.17%).
Discussion
This study was conducted to learn more about the feed-
ing preferences of M. luschani collected from southwest
Turkey. The results showed that M luschani feeds
heavily on coleopters and gastropods.
The chance of a food item being taken depends on the
abundance and ease of capture of the different food cate-
gories. Coleopters, although fairly fast moving are
abundant in the foraging area. Gastropods and arachnids
although easier to catch are slightly less abundant.
The results suggest that M. luschani is an opportunist
predator on diverse forms. This situation is related to the
type of habitat they live in and abundance of prey spe-
cies in the vicinity.
Literature Cited
Baran, I., and M. K. Atatiir 1997. Turkish herpetofauna.
The Republic of Turkish, Ministry of Environment
Publications, Ankara. 214 pp.
Ba§oglu, M., N. Ozeti, I. Yimaz 1994. Tiirkiye
amfibileri, Ege Universitesi Basmevi, Bomova-
zmir. 221 pp. (in Turkish)
Demirsoy, A. 1998a. Ya§amin temel kurallari omurga-
szlar=invertebrata -bocekler di§inda- Meteksan A.
§., Ankara. Cilt 2, Kisim 1: 1210 pp. (in Turkish)
Demirsoy, A. 1998b. Ya§amin temel kurallar omur-
gaslar/bocekler, entomoloji. Meteksan A.§., Ankara.
Cilt 2, Kisim 2: 941 pp.
Du§en, S. and M. Oz. 2001. A research on the feeding
biology of Laudakia ( =Agama ) stellio (Linnaeus,
1758) (Lacertilia: Agamidae) populations in the
Antalya region. Turkish Journal of Zoology
25:177-181.
Gittins, S. P. 1987. The diet of the common toad {Bufo
bufo ) around a pond in Mid- Wales. Amphibia-Rep-
tilia 8:13-17.
Grzimek, B. 1979a. Weichtiere und stachelhauter.
Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, Munchen. Band 3,
613 pp.
Grzimek, B. 1979b. Insekten. Deutscher Taschenbuch
Verlag, Munchen. Band 2, 627 pp.
Klewen, R. 1991. Die land salamander Europas. Teil 1.
2nd Ed. Die Neue Breihm Biicherei. Wittenberg
Lutherstadt. 584 pp.
Lodos, N. 1986. Tiirkiye Entomolojisi. Ege Universitesi
Ziraat Fakultesi Yayinlari no: 429, izmir. Cilt 2. 384
pp.
Ozeti, N. 1973. A study on the reproductive biology of
the salamander Mertensiella luschani atifi Ba§oglu,
1967 (Urodela, Amphibia). Scientific Report of the
Faculty of Sciences of Ege University, izmir 164: 1-
17.
Ozeti, N. 1980. Reproductive biology of Mertensiella
luschani antalyana. Herpetologica 35 (3): 193-197.
Reicholf-Riehm, H. 1984. Steinbach’s naturfuhrer
insekten mit anhang spinnentiere. Mosaik Verlag.
287 pp.
Steinfartz, S. and T. Mutz 1998. Mertensiella luschani
(Steindachner, 1891) lykischen salamander, kleinasi-
atischer salamander. In: K. Grossenbacher and B.
Thiesmeier (eds.), Handbuch der reptilien und
amphibien Europas, Vol. 4/1.
Veith, M., I. Baran, O. Godmann, A. Kiefer, M. Oz, and
M. R. Tun?. 2001. A revision of population designa-
tion and geographic distribution of the lycian sala-
mander Mertensiella luschani (Steindachner, 1891).
Zoology in the Middle East 22:67-82.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, pp. 168-175
First Description of Egg Sacs and Early Larval Development in
Hynobiid Salamanders (Urodela, Hynobiidae, Batrachuperus )
from North-Eastern Iran
Mehregan Ebrahimi1, Hagi Gholi Kami2, Matthias Stock3
1 Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Shiraz, P.O.Box:? 1 454-1460,
Shiraz, Iran; E-mail: emehrgan@yahoo.com
2 Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources,
P.O.Box:491 65-386, Gorgan, Iran; E-mail: hgkami2000@yahoo.com
3 Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Integrative Biology,
3101 Valley Life Sciences Building #3 160, Berkeley, CA 94720-3160, USA; E-mail: matthias@berkeley.edu
Abstract. - Here we present the first life history data from a natural habitat on the clutch and from the laboratory on
the early embryonic development of an Iranian hynobiid salamander (the Eastern nominal taxon, Batrachuperus gor-
ganensis). We compare these observations with those of other hynobiid species. The egg sac of B. gorganensis var-
ied from 80 to 182 mm (mean 132.5), and in width from 16 to 22.5 mm (mean 18.9). Single sacs, the largest known
for the genus, contained 31-52 eggs (mean 37.4) in four rows per cross section. Egg sac data are more similar to those
of Ranodon sibiricus (and B. musters i) than to Eastern Batrachuperus ( longdongensis , tibetanus, pinchonii,
karlschmidti, yenyuanensis ), which have strings of single eggs. As is typical of all Batrachuperus, eggs of B. gorga-
nensis are non-pigmented. Embryonic B. gorganensis larvae may exhibit rudimentary balancers, possibly like those
of Ranodon sibiricus, but further investigation is necessary. Detailed morphometric measurements of the larvae of B.
gorganensis and color photographs of some developmental stages are presented.
Key words. - Hynobiidae, Batrachuperus, Batrachuperus gorganensis, Batrachuperus persicus, Batrachuperus
mustersi, Ranodon sibiricus, Iran, egg sacs, embryonic development, larvae, balancer, taxonomy, morphometries.
Introduction
The southwestern-most representatives of the salaman-
der family Hynobiidae occur within the narrow, East-
West oriented Hyrcanian Corridor (= Hyrcania) of
Northern Iran. The corridor is a “unique relict biogeo-
graphic area,” which is “well defined as the south-west-
ern and southern shores of the Caspian Sea ...” and is
“one of the most clearly defined and delineated
provinces in the Irano-Turanian region44 (Fet, 1994). The
Persian mountain salamander, Batrachuperus persicus
Eiselt and Steiner, 1970, was based on larvae collected
from the western part of Hyrcania (NW-Iran, mountains
near Asalem, Gilan province; Eiselt and Steiner, 1970).
Subsequently, specimens that metamorphosed in captiv-
ity were described and several additional localities were
reported (see Schmidtler and Schmidtler, 1971; Steiner,
1973).
The second nominal taxon, Batrachuperus gorga-
nensis (Clergue-Gazeau and Thorn, 1979), was
described from a single adult male type discovered in a
cave from the eastern edge of the Hyrcanian Corridor
(Clergue-Gazeau and Farcy, 1978). Baloutch and Kami
(1995), Kami and Vakilpoure (1996) as well as Kami
(1999, 2004) published additional data on the biology
and distribution of Iranian hynobiid salamanders, all
assigned to B. persicus. Stock (1999) provided a flow-
cytometric DNA measurement (34.77 pg, but based on
GC-biased DAPI-staining, see also Litvinchuk et al.,
2004) and a Giemsa-stained karyotype (2n = 62) of
topotypic B. gorganensis (i.e. the eastern taxon). Stock
also described external larval changes during the devel-
opment from 40 mm until metamorphosis (100 mm),
and reviewed previous papers (see also map with geo-
graphic coordinates of all previously published localities
- Stock, 1999: Fig. 1). After examination of topotypic
subadults and larvae of both taxa as well as morphome-
tric comparisons with B. mustersi, B. pinchonii, and
Ranodon sibiricus, Stock considered a clinal variation of
characters between the western {B. persicus ) and the
eastern nominal taxon (B. gorganensis ) possible (see
also Thom and Raffaelli, 2001: 122). However, molecu-
lar and cytogenetic data as well as a continuous exami-
nation of the morphological variation throughout the
Hyrcanian corridor are lacking.
Both nominal Iranian taxa (cf. Anderson, 1985;
Brame, 1985: 567; Duellman and Trueb, 1986: 497;
Thom and Raffaelli, 2001) are considered two out of
currently nine species of the genus Batrachuperus
(Frost, 2002). Risch (1984) regarded gorganensis to
belong to a separate genus (. Paradactylodon; see Reilly,
1987). While the molecular phylogeny of eastern
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 169
Asiatic Hcrpetological Research
2004
Figure 1. Locality: a. Sketch map of northern Iran with its
forested regions and the study area, the educational for-
est of Shastkola; b. Shastkola forest with districts I and II
and streams. The left arrow marks the Shastkola river; c.
District II of Shastkola forest shown in (b) with its 31 land
parcels, the spring of Manzoulak is situated in parcel 14.
Batrachuperus has been examined (Fu et al., 2001),
molecular comparisons of their relationships with
Western Batrachuperus and Ranodon as well as between
the latter taxa are not yet available. However, unpub-
lished results (Macey et al. in prep., with phylogram pre-
sented in Larson et al., 2003: 44, Fig. 2.4) provide evi-
dence that Iranian Batrachuperus may be more closely
related to Ranodon (Kazakhstan, China) and B. muster-
si (Afghanistan) than to the Eastern Batrachuperus
species (Tibet, China). Ranodon sibiricus has five toes
on the hind limbs while B. mustersi, and B. persicus/B.
gorganensis have only four. However, the intraspecific
variation found by Reilly (1983) in B. mustersi , which
sometimes has five instead of four toes, demonstrates
how ambiguous this character can be.
In general, there is still a lack of biological data on
the Iranian taxa, e.g., their egg sacs and early larvae
have never been examined. Only remains of egg cases of
B. persicus were found by Steiner (1973) in late July in
the Central Elburz range and the reports on larvae start
from a minimum size of 22.7 mm (Central Iran; Steiner,
1973) and “about 30 mm” (NW-Iran, Schmidtler and
Schmidtler, 1970). Here we present the first data on the
clutch of the Eastern Hyrcanian hynobiid taxon (B. gor-
ganensis) from a natural habitat. We add some data on
its development in the laboratory and compare these
observations with the features known from other hyno-
biid species.
Results and Discussion
Spawning site. - All clutches (Table 1) were found in
Cheshme-ye (= spring of) Manzoulak (36°42' N, 54 2 1
E), which flows into an artificial pond (3.20 x 2.15 x
1.25 m). Its bottom is covered with a thick layer ( ca . 15
cm) of tree leaves. Some crabs ( Potamon sp.) and lar-
vae of Odonata, Trichoptera, Coleoptera,
Ephemeroptera were observed. Manzoulak spring is one
of the important water resources of the Shastkola educa-
tional forest (3716 ha), which is situated 13 km South-
West of Gorgan city between 36° 41 36° 45' N and 54c
20' - 54° 24' E, on the northern slopes of the Elburz
mountains (Fig. 1). These mountains reach elevations
ranging from 240 m, above the Caspian Sea in the North
to 2168 m (Gholle-ye-leila Kouh). Shastkola forest is
divided into two organizational units, districts I (1698.6
ha) and II (2017.4 ha). The spring is situated in II [Fig.
lc, land parcel 14 (75 ha), 650 m to 830 m]. Outcrops
consist mainly of a sequence of sandstones and schist in
the lower part and Triassic sand stones in the upper
parts. Shastkola forest has a Caspian climate, and the
nearest climate station is Gorgan (155 m a.s.l.).
However, local climate at the breeding site differs con-
siderably from that at the foothills and we currently have
no detailed climatic data on the site. Water temperature
during collection was below 10°C. The forest tree and
shrub species include Fagus orientalis , Carpinus betu-
lus, Parrotia persica, Ruscus hyrcana , and Ilex aquifo-
lia (for further information: Azadfar, 1994: Azadfar and
Darghahi, 2002), which adds to the accumulating evi-
dence that the Iranian hynobiid taxa inhabit humid
regions mainly overgrown with the plant assemblage
Fagetum hyrcanum in lower elevations in the West of
their range: Parrotio-Carpinetum: in eastern parts of the
Elburz N-slope: Carpinetum orientalis , Quercus
macr anther a\ see also ref. in Stock. 1999).
Description of clutches, eggs and larvae. - About 70
clutches and four adult salamanders were discovered
when leaves were removed from the pond by G. Yolmeh
on January, 28, 2002, but only two of the clutches and
one adult specimen (total length: 21 1 mm) were sent to
the Museum of Zoology of Gorgan University (ZMGU).
In the following year on February. 8. 2003, one complete
and two incomplete clutches were collected in the same
pond by M. Ebrahimi and G. Soltanpour. We presume
that spawning, at least at this site, happened between the
second half of January and the first days of February.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 170
Figure 2 (A-J). A. Natural habitat of Batrachuperus gorganensis. Stream near Manzoulak spring, photograph taken:
March, 10, 2003. B Clutch, preserved, collection date: March, 10, 2003, photograph taken: April, 6, 2003. C. Clutch,
collection date: March, 10, 2003, photograph taken: April, 4, 2003. D. The same clutch as in C, collection date: March,
10, 2003, photograph taken: April, 4, 2003. E. Fixed embryo, 7 days before hatching, photograph taken: October, 9,
2003. F Fixed larva, 4 days after hatching, photograph taken: October, 9, 2003. G. Living larva, 18 days after hatch-
ing, photograph taken: April, 6, 2003. H. Living larva, 18 days after hatching, photograph taken: April, 6, 2003. I. Living
larva, 24 days after hatching, photograph taken: April, 6, 2003. J. Fixed larva, 34 days after hatching, photograph
taken: October, 9, 2003.
However, in general, the breeding season in both Iranian
nominal taxa might last as long as in some other
Hynobiids (e.g. in Ranodon sibiricus from the end of
April until the beginning of August - Kuzmin, 1995:
111; from May to beginning of August in B. karlschmidti
- Liu, 1950: 91).
During collection, some egg sacs broke. Originally,
the clutches were attached by their stalks to a stone at the
corner of the pond; no egg sacs were observed on its
walls. As is usual in Batrachuperus , each clutch consist-
ed of two asymmetrical, colorless, cylindrical gelatinous
sacs that were connected by gelatinous filaments form-
ing an attaching stalk and had free filaments at their
nonanchored conical ends. As in Ranodon sibiricus (see
Kuzmin, 2001: 40), egg sac data varied between and
within clutches (see Fig. 2 B-D; Table 1). Each cylindri-
cal gelatinous sac contained four rows of eggs per cross
section and each egg was surrounded by a spherical
gelatinous envelope. As is known from Ranodon sibiri-
cus (see Kuzmin and Thiesmeier, 2001: 42 and ref.
therein), these four egg rows produce a tetrahedral shape
immediately after clutch deposition. However, as the
result of an ingress of water, sacs later strongly increase
in size. We believe that all discovered clutches had
already finished this first swelling, which usually gradu-
ally continues throughout the embryonic development
leading to a considerable enlargement of the sacs until
hatching. Tables 2 and 3 show comparisons of egg sac
length and width of eight hynobiid species. Data on
length and width should be evaluated with some reser-
vations, because the number of specimens examined or
time after clutch deposition is imperfectly known.
However, egg sacs of B. gorganensis probably are larg-
er than those of any of the close relatives of the taxon
(with the possible exception ot B. longdongensis ) and
appear to contain among the highest number of eggs per
Vol. 10, p. 171
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Table 1 . Overview of described clutches of Batrachuperus gorganensis.
sac (Table 4). In addition, R. sibiricus and B. gorganen-
sis share the common feature of four rows of eggs per
cross section in an egg sac, while all Eastern taxa ( B .
longdongensis, B. tibetanus, B. pinchonii, B.
karlschmidti, B. yenyuanensis ) seem to have only a sin-
gle row of eggs in an egg case (judging from photo-
graphs and Zhao and Hu, 1988: 32). This feature
remains obscure in B. mnstersi, since neither Reilly’s
(1983) description nor Nawabi’s (1965) photograph
resolve the question satisfactorily, but more than a single
row appears to be present. Egg number may be a taxo-
nomic character but might not affect fecundity since
some species seem to deposit more than one clutch per
breeding period (Liu, 1950; Reilly, 1983).
The diameter of the initially yellowish (as in all
Batrachuperus and R. sibiricus) eggs varied from 4.10
to 5.00 mm (mean 4.56; n = 10) when the clutch was
found. The early eggs had a white animal pole whereas
the vegetal pole was pigmented gray. Unfortunately,
early eggs were not photographed. The separation of
eggs in a row was less than the diameter of an egg. Egg
number varied from 7 to 1 1 per row (2 egg sacs exam-
ined) and from 31 to 52 in each sac (see Table 1). The
eggs have substantial amounts of yolk, as also is typical
of stream-breeding R. sibiricus (Kuzmin and
Thiesmeier, 2001).
Three complete clutches and one incomplete clutch
were kept in a refrigerator at 5-7°C (for conditions see
Stock, 1999). The first larvae to hatch were found on
March, 19, 2003, and the latest specimens to hatch were
observed on March, 25, 2003 (i.e. 40 to 46 days after
discovery, respectively). Some larvae at different devel-
opmental stages were fixed in 4% formalin and 70%
alcohol and measurements were taken from all speci-
mens (summarized in Table 5). We report some larval
developmental traits and link them by inserting the
approximate stage (see inserted number in [...]) of nor-
mal development for Ranodon sibiricus drawn by
Kuzmin and Thiesmeier (2001: 46, after the description
ofLebedkina, 1964).
Hatching larvae [stage 1] exhibited limb buds (Fig.
2F). Although no balancers were observed in hatched
larvae (Fig. 2F), we believe that a rudimentary structure
observed in an embryo fixed 7 days before hatching
(Fig. 2E) could be a balancer. These enigmatic,
ephemeral larval organs, found in three of the ten fami-
lies of salamanders (Crawford and Wake, 1998), are
present in many species of Hynobiidae (Crawford and
Wake, 1998: 115). In the presumed close relative of the
Iranian hynobiids, B. mustersi (see introduction), dis-
tinct balancers are well documented (Nawabi, 1965, see
also Reilly, 1983). Although such a well developed
Table 2. Egg sac length of eight* hynobiid species, comparison of available data on Batrachuperus mustersi from
Nawabi (1965), Reilly (1983), and Sparreboom (1979); on R. sibiricus (from Brushko and Narbaeva 1988, cited from
Kuzmin and Thiesmeier 2001); B. gorganensis (our data); B. longdongensis, B. tibetanus, B. yenyuanensis from Fei
and Ye (2001), B. pinchonii and B. karlschmidti horn Liu (1950) and Fei and Ye (2001); in R. sibihcus numbers in paren-
theses show rare values in late stages of embryonic development (* some authors synonymized B. karlschmidti with
B. tibetanus, but see Fu et al. 2001 and Frost 2002).
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 172
Table 3. Egg sac width of eight hynobiid species, comparison of available data; same sources as in table 2, the only
available value for R. sibiricus is from an egg sac of 72-75 mm length.
organ is absent in Ranodon sibiricus (cf. Crawford and
Wake, 1998: 115), the presence of rudimentary bal-
ancers in the species appears possible. Regel (1968: 17,
see “pb” in her Fig. 7, transl. from Russian) wrote on R.
sibiricus larvae in developmental stage 3 (15-17 mm):
“On the lateral surface of the distal end of the palatino-
quadratum cartilage an excrescence develops, which is a
rudimentary proc. balancer (Rusconi’s hook)”. Although
balancers are not cartilaginous structures, Kuzmin and
Thiesmeier (2001: 43) quote this as an indication of
rudimentary balancers in Ranodon. Based on these
observations, we believe that at least rudimentary bal-
ancers will be found in B. gorganensis (and B. persi-
cusl), and we recommend further comparative investi-
gation with histological methods. Secondary loss of well
developed balancers may be an adaptation of the
“limnophilous mountain brook type” of larvae in B. gor-
ganensis / B. persicus (discussed in Stock, 1999: 237).
According to available data, balancers may be absent in
all species of Batrachuperus from China and Tibet
(Table 4).
In larvae eight days after hatching (d.a.h.) [stage 2-
3], the head had differentiated and forelimbs had a
shovel-like form, but only hind limb buds were visible.
The yolk sac regressed and was very small in larvae 14
d.a.h. (April, 2nd, 2003). In larvae 16-18 d.a.h. [stage 6-
7] (Fig. 2G-H), the yolk sac had disappeared, dark spots
became visible at the back, and the tail fin developed,
although development of the digits was incomplete
(April, 4, 2003). In larvae 24 d.a.h. [stage 8-9] (Fig. 21),
digits were well developed in forelimbs, but the toes of
hind limbs were still incomplete (April, 12, 2003). In
larvae 34 d.a.h. [stage 12] (Fig. 2J) the forelimbs were
completely developed, digits were clearly distinguish-
able, and tips of all digits and toes exhibited brown
homy claws. The ventral surface had a milky color, the
upper part of the tail and the tail fin showed dark spots,
and the eyes appeared completely developed. Through
time, the dark spots became more abundant at the tip of
tail, and the mouth. Darkly pigmented dots appeared on
part of the head and trunk, the flanks, the upper parts of
the tail, and the upper tail fin. At this stage, larvae were
fed with nauplius larvae of Artemia. In larvae 46 d.a.h.,
the belly remained spotless, but the flanks, dorsal body
parts and upper parts of the tail showed dark spots.
Larvae 62 d.a.h. exhibited brownish spots on the body
and dark spots became rarer (larger larvae had golden
dots on the gills and on parts of the body). The anterior
part of the upper tail fin extended to the occiput.
In addition to the clutches described above, more
than 20 large larvae with a total length of almost 10 cm
were collected in the leaves of the breeding pond, but
only one adult specimen was found. The pond was
searched completely, but no larvae smaller than about 10
cm were found. Therefore, we conclude that all these
large larvae apparently stemmed from the preceding
year. The growth rate data of the larvae hatched from the
clutches in our laboratory fit well with the later develop-
mental stages reported by various previous authors from
natural habitats (summarized in Stock, 1999: Tab. 3).
Table 4. Number of eggs per sac, number of egg rows per cross section and presence of a balancer of eight hynobi-
id species, comparison of available data; same sources as in table 2, except for B. lorigdongensis in which the char-
acter was inferred from the ovary of voucher MVZ 208610.
Vol. 10, p. 173
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
dis-
tance
min. max snout number
eye dist. hind distance hight to ant. of rec-
total head body body tail head diame- eye to foreleg leg between dorsal point ognized mass
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vo). 10, p. 174
Table 5 (previous page). Morphometric data on early larvae of Batrachuperus gorganensis.
d.a.h. = days after hatching; SD = standard deviation; Min = minimum; Max = maximum;
N = number of larvae measured (the value in parentheses shows from how many clutches the measured larvae orig
inated)
According to these studies, larvae from the first season
may reach a total length of 30 to 62 mm (persicus,
between June and August) and 41 to 50 mm {gorganen-
sis, mid of June), respectively, and must overwinter
before they form “large larvae”, which can enter meta-
morphosis in the following year.
Conclusions and Future Research
Our initial studies support the relationship of the three
taxa Ranodon sibiricus, Batrachuperus mustersi and the
Iranian hynobiid(s), i.e. B. persicus and B. gorganensis.
These taxa have apparently more features in common
than with the Batrachuperus taxa East of Tibet. In addi-
tion to the essential need for molecular data, it would be
valuable and interesting to study egg deposition in the
natural habitats in more detail and to collect data
throughout the range of the Iranian hynobiid salaman-
ders, especially from the central and western portions.
During proof reading, one of us (HGK) provided infor-
mation that MMTT 452, 453, and 454 are eggs of B. per-
sicus, found near the road from Asalem to Khalkhal, col-
lected May, 20, 1975, by M. Thireau, R. Khazaie and R.
G. Tuck.
Acknowledgments
M. E. and H. G .K. wish to thank G. Yolmeh for provid-
ing material and initial information on the spawning
pond, as well as G. Soltanpour for help during the field
work. M. S. thanks David Wake for references and
advice, Tate Tunstall for translation from Chinese, S. L.
Kuzmin for data on R. sibiricus, G. Wogan and J.
Vindum for references, Robert Hijmans for cartographic
support, J. Robert Macey and Theodore Papenfuss for
permission to include unpublished information about
relationships of Hynobiidae, Joao Alexandrino for talk-
ing about natural history, James Parham for (im-)
patience with the final version of the manuscript, and
Robert Bingham for checking the English.
Literature Cited
Anderson, S. C. 1985. Amphibians. Pp 987-990. In E.
Yarshater (ed.), Encyclopedia Iranica. vol. 1, fasc.
9, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Azadfar, D., and D. Darghahi. 2002. Phytosociological
map of Shastkola Research Forest (floristic phys-
iognomy), Agricultural Science and Natural
Resources University [see also
http://www.modares.ac.iT/nat/azadfa_d/#VII.].
Azadfar, D. 1994. Preparation of species, volume, crown
coverage and basal area typology maps in Shastkola
Research Forest. Seminar of Forestry College,
Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources
University, Gorgan, I. R. Iran.
Baloutch, M., and H. G. Kami. 1995. [Amphibians of
Iran]. Tehran University Publication, Tehran, 177
pp. (In Farsi).
Brame, A. H. 1985. Family Hynobiidae. Pp. 562-568. In
D. R. Frost (ed.), Amphibian species of the world. A
taxonomic and geographical reference. Allen Press
and Association of Systematics Collections
Lawrence, Kansas.
Brushko, Z. K., and S. P. Narbaeva. 1988. [Reproduction
of Ranodon sibiricus in the Borokhudzir River val-
ley (South Eastern Kazakhstan)]. Ekoloyia
(Sverdlovsk) 2:45-49 (In Russian).
Clergue-Gazeau, M., and J. P. Farcy. 1978. Un
Batrachuperus adulte dans une grotte d’lran.
Espece nouvelle? International Journal of
Speleology 10:185-193.
Clergue-Gazeau, M., and R. Thom. 1979. Une nouvelle
espece de salamandre du genre Batrachuperus en
provenence de l’lran septentrional (Amphibia,
Caudata, Hynobiidae). Bulletin de la Societe
d’Histoire naturelle, Toulouse 114(3/4):455-460.
Crawford, A.J., and D. Wake. 1998. Phylogenetic and
evolutionary perspectives on an enigmatic organ:
the balancer of larval caudate amphibians. Zoology
101:107-123.
Eiselt, J. and H.M. Steiner. 1970. Erstfund eines hyno-
biiden Molches in Iran. Annalen des
Naturhistorischen Museums Wien 74:77-90.
Fei, Liang, and Ye, Chang-yuan. 2001. The colour hand-
book of the Amphibians of Sichuan. Prepared by the
Forestry Department of Sichuan, Sichuan
Association of Wildlife Conservation, Chengdu
Institute of Biology, Chengdu Institute of Biology,
the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Vol. 10, p. 175
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Fet, V. 1994. Biogeographic position of Khorassan-
Kopetdagh. pp. 197-203. In Fet, V., and
K. I. Atatmuradov (eds.), Biogeography and
Ecology of Turkmenistan. Dordrecht, Boston,
London, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Frost, D. R. (ed.): Database Amphibian Species of the
World V2.21, 15 July 2002. [http://research.amnh.
org/cgibin/herpetology/amphibia].
Fu, J., Y. Wang, X. Zeng, Z. Liu, and Y. Zheng. 2001.
Genetic diversity of Eastern Batrachuperus
(Caudata: Hynobiidae). Copeia 2001:1100-1105.
Kami, H. G. 1999. Additional specimens of the Persian
Mountain Salamander, Batrachuperus persicus ,
from Iran (Amphibia: Hynobiidae). Zoology in the
Middle East 19: 37-42.
Kami, H. G. 2004. On the biology of Persian Mountain
Salamander, Batrachuperus persicus (Amphibia,
Caudata, Hynobiidae) in Golestan Province, Iran.
Asiatic Herpetological Research 10:182-190.
Kami, H. G., and E. Vakilpoure. 1996. Geographic dis-
tribution of Batrachuperus persicus. Herpetological
Review 27(3): 147.
Kuzmin, S. L. 1995. The clawed salamanders of Asia.
Neue Brehm-Bucherei, vol. 622. Westarp
Wissenschaften, Magdeburg.
Kuzmin, S. L., and B. Thiesmeier. 2001. Mountain sala-
manders of the genus Ranodon. Advances in
Amphibian Research in the Former Soviet Union 6,
Pensoft, Sofia, Moscow, 184 pp.
Larson, A., D. W. Weisrock, and K. H. Kozak. 2003.
Phylogenetic systematics of salamanders
(Amphibia:Urodela), a review, p. 31-108 In Sever,
D., ed., Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny of the
Urodela, Enfield, New Hampshire, USA, Science
Publishers, Inc.
Litvinchuk, S. N., L. J. Borkin, and J. M. Rozanov.
2004. Intraspecific and interspecific genome size
variation in hynobiid salamanders of Russia and
Kazakhstan: determination by flow cytometry.
Asiatic Herpetological Research 10:279-291.
Liu, C.C. (1950): Amphibians of western China.
Fieldiana: Zool. Mem. (Chicago) 2:80-102.
Nawabi, S. 1965. A rare representative of the amphibi-
ans in Afghanistan Batrachuperius mustersi.
Science, Quarterly Journal of the Institute of
Zoology and Parasitology published by the Faculty
of Science, Kabul-University: 21-25. (In Farsi).
Regel, E.D. 1968. [The development of the cartilaginous
neurocranium and its connection with the upper part
of mandibular arch in Sibirian salamander Ranodon
sibiricus (Hynobiidae, Amphibia)] pp. 5-168 In
Morfologiya nizshikh pozvonochnykh zhivotnikh
[Morphology of lower vertebrates], Trudy
Akademiya Nauk SSSR [Works of the Academy of
Sciences of the USSR], IsdateFstvo Nauka,
Leningrad (In Russian).
Reilly, S.M. 1983. The biology of the high altitude sala-
mander Batrachuperus mustersi from Afghanistan.
Journal of Herpetology 17(1): 1-9.
Reilly, S.M. 1987. Paradactylodon : a junior synonym
for Batrachuperus. Amphibia-Reptilia 8:283-284.
Schmidtler, J.F., and J.J. Schmidtler. 1971. Eine
Salamander-Novitat aus Persien. Batrachuperus
persicus. Aquarien-Magazin 11:443-445.
Sparreboom, M. 1979. [Eggs of Batrachuperus muster-
si ]. Lacerta 37(5):83-88 (In Dutch).
Steiner, H.M. 1973. Beitrage zur Kenntnis von
Verbreitung, Okologie und Binomie von
Batrachuperus persicus (Caudata, Hynobiidae).
Salamandra (Frankfurt/M.) 9(1): 1-6.
Stock, M. 1999. On the biology and the taxonomic sta-
tus of Batrachuperus gorganensis Clergue-Gazeau
et Thorn, 1979 based on topotypic specimens
(Amphibia: Caudata: Hynobiidae). Zoologische
Abhandlungen des Staatlichen Museums fur
Tierkunde Dresden 50(1 4):2 17-241.
Thom R., and J. Raffaelli. 2001. Les Salamandres de
FAncien Monde. Boubee, France, 449 pp. [partly
revised version of the original publication 1968].
Zhao, Er-mi, and Qixiong Hu. 1988. Studies on Chinese
tailed amphibians. Pp. 1-43. In Er-Mi Zhao (ed.)
Studies on Chinese salamanders. Contributions to
Herpetology, no. 4. Society for the Study of
Amphibians and Reptiles, Oxford, Ohio.
Histochemical Characterization of the Lingual Salivary Glands of the
House Gecko, Ptyodactylus hasselquistii (Squamata: Gekkonidae)
Bashir M. Jarrar and Noory T. Taib
Zoology Department, College of Science, King Sand University, P.O.Box 2455, Riyadh 11451 Saudi Arabia.
Abstract. - Histochemical investigations of the lingual salivary glands of the house gecko, Ptyodactylus hasselquistii
have been conducted. The glands are comprised of mucous and mucoserous cells. Mucous cells secrete or elaborate
neutral mucosubstances, neuraminidase sensitive carboxylated mucins, hyaluronidase resistant sulfomucins, but are
devoid of proteins. The mucoserous cells secrete and elaborate neutral mucosubstances and glycoproteins but are
devoid of sialomucins and sulfomucins. The results are discussed in the context of the feeding habits and phylogeny
of reptiles.
Key words. - Histochemistry, lingual, salivary glands, house gecko, Ptyodactylus hasselquistii, Gekkonidae.
Introduction
Histochemical studies on the lingual salivary glands of
vertebrates have mainly been concerned with mammals,
whereas little attention has been paid to the lingual sali-
vary glands of non-mammalian vertebrates. Most stud-
ies on the lingual salivary glands of reptiles have
focused with morphological and histological aspects
while few histochemical studies have been carried on
these glands (Raynaud, 1961; Gabe and Saint-Girons,
1969; Lopes et al., 1982; Taib and Jarrar, 1985a; 1985b;
1985c; 1986; Taib, 1986, Asgah et al., 1990).
Nevertheles, the literature on the lingual secretions of
lizards is rather scanty and their consitituents have yet
to be determined.
The present study is a detailed histochemical char-
acterization of the lingual salivary glands of the house
gecko, Ptyodactylus hasselquistii.
Materials and Methods
Twenty adults of each male and female house gecko
Ptyodactylus hasselquistii were trapped from different
houses in Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia. They were killed by
etherization and the whole tongue was removed from
each animal and quickly immersed for 24 hrs in one of
the following fixatives: neutral buffered formalin,
Bouin's fluid and Gendre's fluid. They were then thor-
oughly washed in running water, processed for serial
sectioning at 4-5 pm thickness and the sections were
stained with haematoxylin-eosin or with Mallory
trichrome for histological examination, whereas the sec-
retary cells of the glands were characterized by the cri-
terion of Gabe and Saint-Girons (1969). Other sections
were used for the following histochemical reactions:
Neutral mucosubstances. - Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS)
technique (Gurr, 1962), PAS after diastase digestion
(McManus and Mowry, 1964), PAS after alpha-amylase
digestion (Luna, 1968), PAS after acetylation blockade
(McManus and Cason, 1950), PAS after acetylation-
saponification (Oxello et al., 1 958), PAS after phenylhy-
drazine treatment (Spicer et al., 1967) and PAS after
treatment with chloroform and methanol.
Acid mucosubstances. - Alcian blue (AB) at pH 2.5,
1.0, and 0.4 (Mowry, 1956; Luna, 1968).
Distinction between acidic and neurtal mucosub-
stances. - AB (pH 2.5)-PAS (Mowry and Winkler, 1956)
and AB (pH 1.0)-PAS (Spicer et al., 1967).
Distinction between sulfomucins and sialomucins. -
Aldehyde fuchsion (AF) and AF-AB, pH 2.5 (Spicer and
Meyer, 1960); weak (25°C, 16 hr), mild (37°C, 4hr) and
strong (60°C h hr) methylation-saponification- AB (PH
2.5) (Spicer, et al., 1967); toluidine blue (TB) buffered at
pH 1.7 and 3.4 (Landsmeer, 1951), critical electrolyte
concentration (CEC) technique for extinction of
alcianophilia at pH 5.6 in the presence of gradual con-
centation of Mg2+ (Scott and Dorling, 1965).
Enzyme digestion tests. - Diastase-PAS technique
(McManus and Mowry, 1964); neuraminidase
(Sialidase, Vibrio chlolerae, type V)-AB (pH 2.5)
(Spicer and Warren, 1960); hyaluronidase (testicular)-
AB (pH 2.5) (Spicer et al., 1967). Ribonuclease diges-
tion (Love and Rabotli 1963); neuraminidase-TB (pH
3.7), hyaluronidase-TB (pH 2.0) were employed. In
each case control sections were incubated for the same
length of time at the same temperature in buffer solu-
tions without the enzyme.
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 177
Asiatic Hcrpetological Research
2004
Figure 1. Lingual glands of P hasselquistii after staining
with haematoxylin-eosin. Note that the mucous cells of
the lingual glands are located in the papillar space of the
papillae. x950.
Figure 2. Lingual glands of P. hasselquistii after staining
with PAS. The reactivity of the glands confirms the pres-
ence of the neutral mucosubstances. x950.
Figure 3. Lingual glands of P hasselquistii after staining
with AB (2.5), confirming the presence of sialomucins
and sulfomucins. x950.
Figure 4. Lingual glands of P. hasselquistii after staining
with AB (I.O)-PAS. The bluish purple color indicates the
presence of neutral and sulfated mucosubstances simul-
taneously. x950.
Figure 5. Lingual glands of P. hasselquistii after staining
with CEC at 0.3M Mg++, confirming that the mucosub-
stances produced by the glands contain carboxyl and
sulfated groups. x950.
7- •
Figure 6. Lingual glands of P. hasselquistii after staining
with MBPB, indicating the protein contents of the glands
secretion. x700.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vo). 10, p. 178
Proteins. - Mercuric bromophenol blue method (Mazia
et al., 1953); ninhydrin-Schiff (Yasuma and Itchikawa,
1953), mercuric-bromophenol blue (MBPB) and PAS
after trypsin digestion (Pearse, 1972).
Photographs. - Photographs were taken with a 35mm
Zeiss Ikon camera on Kodacolor NR 100 film.
Results
The lingual salivary glands of the house gecko,
Ptyodactylus hasselquistii occupy the papi liar invagina-
tion of the posterior two-thirds of the dorsal surface
together with the lateral sides of the tongue. The anteri-
or part of the tongue is devoid of any glandular structure
and covered by keratinized squamous epithelium. These
glands are made of mucous cells located in the inner
papillar space of the filiform papillae (Fig. 1) together
with simple tubular structures made of mucoserous cells
seen at the most posterior part of the dorsum. The
mucous cells have an alveolar cytoplasm and flattened,
basally located nuclei with clear apical ends resting on a
delicate basement membrane.
As summarized in Table 1, the mucous cells of the
lingual glands of P. hasselquistii exhibited strong PAS
reactivity (Fig. 2) which was neither labile to alpha-
amylase nor to saliva digestion but completely lost by
phenylhydrazane treatment. Flowever, this reactivity
was completely blocked by acetylation and was partly
restored by deacetylation-PAS sequential techniques.
They showed marked alcianophilia at both pH 2.5 (Fig.
3) and 1 .0 but to lesser extent at pH 0.4. They also react-
ed with both PAS and AB and stained bluish purple with
AB (2.5)- PAS and AB (1.0) PAS (Fig. 4). These glands
also reacted with AF as well as with AF-AB (2.5) and
AF-AB ( 1 .0). The alcianophilia of the glands was part-
ly lost at pH 2.5 with acid hydrolysis and weak methy-
lation and there after restored by saponificiation tech-
niques. They demonstrated alcianophilia with the CEC
techniques at 0.1M, 0.2M, and to some extent at 0.3M
Mg2+ (Fig. 5) and showed metachromasia at pH 3.4 and
1.7 but reacted negatively to all protein detection tests.
The mucoserous cells of the glands showed PAS
reaction, exhibited no alcianophilia at pH 2.5 and 1.0
and were orthochromatic at pH 3.4 and 1.7 but reacted
positively to all protein detection tests (Fig. 6). No sex-
ual dimorphism was observed in the lingual secretion of
the species under study.
Discussion
The lingual salivary glands present great diversity in
morphology amongst the various groups of reptiles.
These glands are entirely absent from Varan idae.
Amphisbaenia, Ophidia and some species of Cheloma
such as Chelonia mydas (Kochva, 1978). On the other
hand, these glands are simple consisting of three differ-
ent types of goblet cells in most species of Testudinidae
(Nalvade and Varute, 1976; Taib and Jarrar, 1984).
Some lizard possess mainly goblet cells together with
simple tubular glandular structures in their tongues
(Nalvade and Varute, 1976; Shevliuk, 1976; Taib and
Jarrar 1985 b; 1985c and 1986), while others have more
developed lingual salivary glands as seen in some
Agamidae, Iguanidae, Gekkonidae, Anguidae and
Chamaleonidae (Gabe and Saint-Girons, 1969; Kochva,
1978; Asgah et al., 1990). On the bases of the results of
the present study and in view of the criterion of Gab and
Saint-Girons (1969), the lingual salivary glands of
Ptyodactylus hasselquistii are made ot unicellular
mucous goblet cells lining the dorsal epithelium of the
tongue with mucoserous simple tubular glandular appa-
ratus at the base of the tongue. The structure of the lin-
gual salivary glands of P. hasselquistii is different from
those of Tupinambis teguixin , Agama blandfordi,
Uromastyx microlepis, Acanthodactylus schmidti and
Scincus mitranus , which have only mucous cells in their
lingual glands (Lopes et al, 1974; Taib and Jarrar,
1985b; 1985c; 1986; Taib, 1986). According to Gabe
and Saint-Girons (1969), the lingual glands are mucous
in Gekkonidae, mucoserous on Sphenodontidae,
Anguidae and Pygopodidae, but seromucous in
Chamaleonidae and serous in some speices of Iguanidae
and Agamidae. The grading from non-glandular tongues
through unicellular with or without simple tubular glan-
dular structure to only simple tubular and to then tubu-
lo-alveolar ones may reflect developmental stages
towards the definitive lingual glands of higher verte-
brates (Shevliuk, 1976; Kochva, 1978).
A tentative interpretation of the types of mucosub-
stances in the lingual glands of P. hasselquistii can be
made from the results of the different histochemical
reactions used in the present investigation and from the
classification of mucosubstances proposed by Mowry
and Winkler, 1956; Spicer and Meyer, 1960; Scott and
Dorlling, 1965; Pearse, 1972). Neutral mucosubstances
are PAS positive, diastase resistant, as well as unstain-
able by cationic dyes. Acetylation produces derivatives
of primary and secondary amines which prevent 1, 2
glycol groups, from reacting with PAS indicating the
presence of neutral mucosubstances or sialic acid, sepa-
rately or simultaneously. Alcian blue is generally con-
sideied as being specific for identifying acid mucosub-
stances where alcianophilia at pH 2.5 and 1 .0 is specific
tor sialomucins and sulformucins respectively (Mowrv
and Winkler, 1956). In the combined aldehyde fuchsin-
alcian blue sequential techniques, sulfomucins stain pur-
ple blue and sialomucins blue (Spicer and Meyer. 1960)
Vol. 10, p. 179
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Table 1. The histochemical reactions in the lingual salivary glands of Ptyodactylus hasselquistii.
Reactions: - negative; ± weak; +, moderately positive; ++, intensely positive; Cb, complete blockade; M,
mild; Pb, partial blockade; Nb, no blockade; S, strong; TB, toluidine blue; W, weak.
Colors: B, blue; Bp, bluish purple; P, pink.
Glands: MC, mucous cells; MSC, mucoserous cells.
Sialomucins can be identified by alcianophilia at pH 2.5
which is partially lost following acid hydrolysis and
completely removed after neuraminidase digestion, but
neuroaminidase did not affect the staining of sulfated
mucosubstances. A loss of alcianophilia after
hyaluronidase digestion is due to the removal of
hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulfates. Methylation
blocks subsequential stainig of simple mucosubstances
by esterification of carboxyl groups and complex sulfat-
ed mucosubstances desulphation. Subsequent treatment
with potassium hydroxide (saponification) after methy-
lation will restore the staining of carboxyl groups (Drury
et al., 1967). The mucosubstances that are stained at
0. 1 M MgCl2 in the CEC reaction, but not at 0.2M MgCl2
are believed to contain carboxyl group and no sulfate
groups. Sulfated mucosubstances, on the other hand,
stain strongly and selectively at 0.2M Mg2" but lose
their alcianophilia at different levels with increasing
MgCl2 concentration (Spicer and Lillie, 1960). The lin-
gual glands of the species under study resisted trypsin
digestion and the action of (chloroform-methanol)
which excludes the possibility of lipids and proteins.
Accordingly, the lingual salivary glands of of the house
gecko, Ptyodactylus hasselquistii contain neutral muco-
substances, sialadase labile carboxylated mucosub-
stances and hyaluronidase resistant sulfomucins and gly-
coproteins.
The lingual secretions of P. hasselquistii are differ-
ent from those of some lizards such as Tupinambis
teguixin and Agama blandfordii which contain neutral
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 180
mucosbstances and sialomucins but no sulfomucius
(Lopes et al., 1974; Taib and Jarrar, 1985c). They also
differ from the secretions of the lingual glands of
Uromastyx microlepis, Acanthodactylus schmiditi,
Scincus mitranus and Stenodactylus slevini which con-
tain neutral mucosubstances, sialomucins and sulfor-
mucins but no glycoprotein (Taib and Jarrar, 1985b,
1986; Taib, 1986; Asgah et al., 1990). Neutral mucosub-
stances have been demonstrated in the secretions of all
studied reptiles that possess salivary glands while phylo-
genetically, the absence of sulfomucins in the lingual
glands would favour the concept that sialomucins secre-
tive cells are more primitive than sulfated mucosub-
stances secretive ones. In addition, the heterogenous his-
tochemical recactivity of the lingual glands might have
appeared in the evolutionary lines of reptiles to meet the
different changes in the feeding habits of various
species. Neutral mucins were present in the lingual
glands of almost all studied reptile species while sialo-
mucins together with neutral mucosubastances were
identified in the lingual glands of all insectivorous rep-
tiles so far studied (Nalvade and Varute, 1972; Taib and
Jarrar, 1985c, 1986; Taib, 1986). The lingual glands of
all insectivorous and carnivorous reptiles studied thusfar
exhibited sulfomucins. More work is needed to elucidate
whether the lingual secretion diversity of reptiles imply
phylogenetic relationships or different feeding habits.
Literature Cited
Asgah, N. A., N. T. Taib, and B. M. Jarrar 1990.
Morphology, histology and histochemistry of the
cephatic glands of Slevin's ground gecko,
Stenodactylus slevini Hass, 1957. Tropical Zoology
3:209-217.
Bums, B. and V. G. Pickwell. 1972. Cephalic glands in
sea snakes ( Pelamis , Hydrolis, and Laticauda ).
Copeia 1972 (3):547-559.
Carmignani, M. A. and G. Zaccone. 1975.
Histochemical distribution of acid
mucopolysaccharides in the tongue of reptiles. 1-
Chelonia ( Pseudemys scripta Clark). Annals of
Histochemistry 20:77-88.
Drury, A. R., E. A. Wallington, and R. S. Cameron.
1967. Carleton’s histological techniques. 4th ed.
Oxford University Press, London. 203-204 pp.
Gabe, M. and H. Saint-Girons. 1969. Donnees his-
tologiques sur les glandes salivaires des lepi-
dosauriens. Memoires du Museum National d'
Histoire Naturelle 58: 1-1 12.
Gurr, E. 1962. Staining animal tissue: Practical and the-
oretical. Leonard Hill, London. 63 1 pp.
Kochva, E. 1978. Oral glands of the reptilia. Pp. 43-
161. In C. Gans and F. H. Pough, (eds.), Biology of
the Reptilia. Academic Press, New York.
Landsmeer, J. M. F. 1951. Some colloid chemical
aspects of metachroasia. Influence of pH and salts
in metachromatic phenomena evoked by toluidine
blue in animal tissue. Acta Physiologica et
Pharmacologica 2:1 12-128.
Lopes, R. V., V. Valeri, C. Oliveria, G. Compos, and S.
Jucif. 1974. Morphological and histological study
of the salivary glands of the lizard Tupinambis
teguixin (Teiidae, Lacertilia). Ciencia Cultura
26:1035-1070.
Lopes, R. A., R. V. Costa, A. M. Piccolo, and S. O.
Petnusci. 1982. The salivary glands of Ameiva
ameiva (Teiidae, Lacertilia). A morphological, mor-
phometric and histochemical study. Anatomischer
Anzeiger 151:41-49.
Luna, G. 1968. Manual of histological staining method
of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. 3rd Ed.
McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. 258 pp.
Mazia, D., P. A. Brewer, and M. Alfert. 1953. The cyto-
cehmical staining and measurement with mercuric
bromophenol blue. Biological Bulletin 104:57-67.
McManus, J.A. and J. E. Cason. 1950. Carbohydrate
histochemistry studies by acetylation techniques. I.
Periodic acid method. Journal of Experimental
Medicine 91:651-54.
McManus, J. A. and R. W. Mowry. 1964. Staining meth-
ods, histological and histochemical. Harper and
Row, New York. 423pp.
Mowry, R. W. 1956. Alcain blue techniques for histoch-
chemical study and acidic carbohydrates. Journal of
Histochemistry and Cytochemistry 4:407.
Mowry, R. W. and C. H. Winker. 1956. The coloration of
acidic carbohydrates of bacteria and fungi in tissue
sections with special reference to capsules of
Cryptococcus neoformas and Staphylococcus.
American Journal of Pathology 32:628-29.
Nalvade, N. M. and T. A. Varute. 1976. Histochemical
studies on the mucins of the vertebrate tongues.
Vol. 10, p. 1 8 1
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Vlll. Histological analysis of mucosubstances in the
tongue of the turtle Geomyda trijuga. Folia
Histochemica et Cytochemica 14(3): 123- 133.
Oxello, L., M. Ledding and F. F. Speer. 1958. The
ground substances of the central nervous system in
man. American Journal of Pathology 34:363-373
Pearse, A. G. E. 1972. Histochemistry: Theoretical and
applied. 3rd ed. J. & A. Churchill, London. 1 5 1 8 pp.
Raynaud, M. J. 1961. Sur la structure des glands sali-
varies de l'orvet ( Anguis fragilis Linnaeus, 1758).
Bulletin de la Societe Zoologique de France
86:710-713.
Scott, D. E. and J. Dorling. 1965. Diffemeital staining of
acid glycosaminoglycans (Mucopolysaccharides)
by alcian blue in salt solutions. Histochemie 5:221-
233.
Shevliuk, N. N. 1976. Contribution to histological char-
acterstics of salivary glands of the tongue in certain
classes of vertebrates. Anatomia Histologia
Embriologia 70(30):58-62.
Spicer, S. S. and D. B. Meyer. 1960. Histochemical dif-
ferentiation of acid mucopolysaccharides by means
of combined aldehyde fuchsin-alcian blue staining.
American Journal of Clinical Pathology 33:433-
460.
Spicer, S. S. and R. D. Lillie. 1960. Saponification as a
mean of selective reversing the methylation block-
ade of tissue basophilia. Journal of Histochemistry
and Cytochemistry 7:123-125.
Spicer, S. S. and L. Warren. 1960. The histochemistry of
sialic acid containing mucoproteins. Journal of
Histochemistry and Cytochemistry 8:135-137.
Spicer, S. S., R. G. Horn, and T. J. Leppi. 1967.
Histochemistry of connective tissue mucopolysac-
charides. pp 251-303. In: The connective tissues.
International Academy of Pathology Monograph
No.7. Williams and Wikins, Balthimore.
Taib, N. T. 1986. Histochemical observations on the lin-
gul salivary glands of the skink Scincus mitranus
(Anderson, 1871) (Scindidae, Reptilla): Bulletin of
the Chicago Herpetological Society 2 1(1 -2): 14-22.
Taib, N. T. and B. M. Jarrar. 1985a. Histochemical char-
acterization of musousbstances in the tongue of the
terrapin, Mauremys caspica (Gmelin) (Reptilia,
Testudins, Emydidae). Jorurnal of Biological
Sciences Research, Iraq 16(2):239-249.
Taib, N. T. and B. M. Jarrar 1985b. Histochemical stud-
ies on the lingual salivary glands of the spiny-tailed
lizard Uromastyx microlepis (Blandford). Bulletin
of the Institute of Zoology, Academia Sinica
24(2):203-212.
Taib, N. T. and B. M. Jarrar. 1985c. Histochemical
analysis of mucosubstances in the lingual salivary
glands of the lizard A gam a blandfordi (Agamidae,
Reptilia). Sudan Journal of Science 1:97-101.
Taib, N. T. and B. M. Jarrar. 1986. The histochemistr of
the lingual salivary glands of the lizard
Acanthodactylus schmidti (Wiegmann) (Reptilia,
Lacertilia, Lacertidae). Bulletin of the Maryland
Herpetological Society 22(2):27-36.
Yasuma, A. and T. Itchikawa. 1953. Nihydrin-Schiff and
alloxan Schiff staining, A new histochemical
method for protein. Journal of the Laboratory
Clinical Medicine 41:296-299.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, pp. 182-190
The Biology of the Persian Mountain Salamander, Batrachuperus persicus
(Amphibia, Caudata, Hynobiidae) in Golestan Province, Iran
Haji Gholi Kami
Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Agricultural Sciences
and Natural Resources, P O. Box 49165, Gorgan, Iran.
Abstract. - The Persian Mountain Salamander, Batrachuperus persicus, is a hynobiid endemic to Iran and is distrib-
uted in specific localities of Hyrcanian forests in four northern provinces of Iran. The biology of this salamander was
studied at four localities in Golestan Province of Iran, especially in Shirabad Cave, between 1996 and 1999.
Information is presented about the cave and other localities. This salamander has four fingers and toes. The larval
stages of the salamander are found at all times of year and probably don't transform during the first year. The head
form of small larvae is wider posteriorly while the head form of large larvae, juveniles and adult specimens is more
or less rectangular. Juveniles have more yellow spots than adults. Juvenile and adult specimens are found inside and
outside of water in the cave but in other localities they can be found in burrows around springs and are not active dur-
ing the day. They feed on larval and adult forms of insects and other arthropods. Adults also feed on small specimens
of bats ( Myotis blythyii) inside of the cave. Some large specimens are cannibalistic and feed on larvae and juveniles
of B. persicus in natural habitats and in the laboratory. This species does not hibernate inside the cave and is active
all times of the year. The total length of the longest specimen was 268.5 mm.
Key words. - Amphibia, Hynobiidae, Batrachuperus persicus, Iran.
Introduction
The Persian Mountain Salamander, Batrachuperus per-
sicus Eiselt and Steiner 1970, was described based on
five salamander larvae collected near Asalem in the
Talesh Mountains in Gilan Province of Iran (Eiselt and
Steiner, 1970) (See editorial note and Ebrahimi et al.,
2004). Subsequently J. J and J. F Schmidtler collected
some larvae in Weyser, southeast of Chalus, in
Mazandaran Province, Iran, in 1970. These transformed
in captivity and a brief description of juvenile specimens
was presented (Schmidtler and Schmidtler, 1971).
Primary information was presented on adult specimens
in Ardabil Province of Iran (Baloutch and Kami, 1995).
New distribution records were published some years ago
(Kami and Vakilpoure, 1996). Adult specimens of this
species were described for the first time together with
their habitats in Gilan and Ardabil provinces of Iran
(Kami, 1999).
The biology of this salamander has been studied in
the laboratory and in natural habitats especially in
Shirabad Cave of Khanbebain. Students of Gorgan
University and I have visited Shirabad Cave twelve
times between 1996 and 1999. Detailed information on
the other localities is sparse and these localities must be
studied more in the future.
Study areas. - Batrachuperus persicus is distributed in
the four northern provinces of Iran (Fig. 1). Figure 2
shows new localities of Batrachuperus persicus in
Golestan Province. Most of the research was done at
locality 1 (Shirabad Cave), other localities were visited
only one time. Climatic information for five cities of
Golestan Province is summarized in Table 1 .
Locality 1. Shirabad Cave- Shirabad Cave (36° 57' N,
55° 03' E) is situated 70 km East of Gorgan, southeast of
Khanbebain and Shirabad Village at about 420 m above
sea level (Fig. 3, 4). The cave and waterfalls were desig-
nated as a National Park by the Department of
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 183
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Tab 1. Summary of climatic information (15 years) in five cities of Golestan province of Iran.
Figure 2. Localities of of Batrachuperus persicus in Golestan Province, Iran: 1- Shirabad Cave, 2 - Vantakhteh; 3- Near
Shirabad Cave; 4- Spring of Khouklou; 5- Barankouh (36° 45' N, 54° 25' E), about 10 km south west of Gorgan, almost
1100 m elevation; 6- Spring of Khonakou, situated south southwest of Gorgan, Jahannama Protected Area, Valley of
Sorkhcheshmeh, below elevations of Pir-e-zan (elevations of Pahlavan Ghaleh), 1800 m elevation; 7- elevations of
Yakhkesh (36° 42' N, 54° 23' E) about 15 km south of Gorgan, 2300 m elevation; 8- Water falls of Shirabad; 9- Valley
of Loushan, inside of valley, (36° 42' N, 54° 41' E) about 30 km southeast of Gorgan; 10- Region of Aram-e-
Sorkhcheshmeh opposite side of Siah Marzkouh, Village of Aliabad. Circles are cities: 1- Gorgan; 2- Aliabad; 3-
Ramian; 4- Azadshahr; 5- Gonbad-e-kavous; 6- Minoudasht; 7- Kalaleh.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 184
Table 2. Dates of study, air and water temperature of four
localities in Golestan province of Iran.
37°00
Environment of Gorgan and Gonbad-e-Kavous in 1998.
There are seven waterfalls below the cave. The entrance
of the cave is about 15 m high and is at least 3-4 m high
in other parts of the cave. It is almost 240 m long and is
completely dark. Water emerges from the mouth of the
cave and flows to the river and waterfalls at all times of
the year.
No plant species live inside the cave, but there is
Lycopodium sp on the floor of cave from the entrance to
about 10 m inside of it on large flat stones. Some plant
species that were identified outside the entrance of the
cave on 28 February 1997 and 17 April 1997 are:
Pteridum aquilinum, Adianthum capillus-veneris,
Athyrium flix-mas, Phyllitis scolopendrium, Funaria sp,
Celtis australis, Evonymus latifolia, Convulvulus
(=Calistegia) sepium, Hedera pastochowii, Lamium
album, Carex pendula, Rubus hyrcana, Ficus carica,
Danae recemosa, Acer insigne, Parrotia persica,
Carpinus betulus Cyclamen elegans, Marcantia sp.
The water temperature of cave is 10-13°C (Mean
1 1 .6°C) and is constant from the entrance to end of cave.
Air temperature of cave varied between 1 2.5-2 1°C over
six visits. The inside of the cave is a little warmer than
the entrance of the cave (Table 2).
Locality 2. Vantakliteli. - The Spring of Vantakhteh (36°
40' N, 54° 25' E ) is about 1 8 km south of Gorgan City
and 5 km southwest of Ziarat Village at about 1200-1300
55°00'
+
55°05'
+
37°00'
kouh-e-NargesI
0 331 m
Daland water resource
To Khanebain
\
\__ Shirabad village
Figure 3. That National park that includes the cave and
waterfalls of Shirabad (1650 Hectares).
m elevation. Salamanders were observed in this locality
in 1979 and later in Yakhkesh (2300 m elevation) on 25
November, 1999. There are two springs in this locality
that are formed from soil and limestone and situated to
east. Water flows from springs to the Souteh River.
The sides of the river were frozen and snowy. The
springs are 3-4 m above the river. Water temperature of
one spring was 6.5 and other 7°C. Air temperature was
6°C at 13:30 and 2°C at 15:30. Snow was melted in east
side of the springs. Some plant species found around the
springs are as follows: Rosa albicans, Berberis vulgaris,
Juniperus communis, Carpinus orientalis, Juncus
effusus, Circium nekarmanicum, St achy s bizantica. Five
salamanders, all metamorphosed, were found inside of
burrows near the springs.
Locality 3. Near Shirabad Cave. - Locality 3 is a small
pond (about 2m x 2m) in southwest of Shirabad Village
and 20 m above Shirabad Cave. Water depth was almost
50 cm. Around this shady pond were stones, lichens and
trees {Danae racemosa, Quercus sp). A Grass Snake
(Natrix natrix), Marsh Frogs (Rana ridibunda), crabs
{Potamon sp.; and larvae of Batrachuperus persicus
with total length of 3-4 cm were observed. No adult or
metamorphosed salamanders were seen. Air temperature
was 20-23. 5°C and water temperature was 19°C at 1000
on 10 July 1997. Some larvae such as Gerridae
(Heteroptera), Chironomidae (Diptera), Ephemeroptera,
and Amphipoda (Gamaridae), earthworms
(Lumbricidae), and Gastropoda were collected inside
and around the pond under decaying logs.
Vol. 10, p. 185
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Table. 3. Measurments of living Batrachuperus persicus inside of Shirabad cave of Golestan province of Iran. All spec-
imens were released after measuring. All measurements are in mm.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 186
Locality 4. Spring of Khouklou. - The Spring of
Khouklou (36° 44' N, 54° 53' E) is situated almost 23 km
south of Aliabad at about 1500 m elevation. This spring
is 200 m west of Chenarbin and along side of the
Khouklou River and situated to north beneath a large
rock. This locality was studied on 26 May 1999. Six
specimens were seen and three of them were collected.
All specimens had external gills.
Materials and Methods
Shirabad Cave was studied 12 times and the other local-
ities only one time between 1996 and 1999. Air and
water temperature of the cave and two other localities
measured on some dates. Important plant species of
localities were identified. Measurements (total, head,
trunk, and tail lengths) were done on living specimens of
salamanders inside the cave. Some specimens (larval
and transformed) collected and brought to aquaria at the
zoology laboratory of Gorgan University and kept with
ice. Some specimens (30) were fixed in alcohol or for-
malin. Almost all fixed transformed salamanders were
dissected and stomach contents and sexes were noted.
Morphometric and meristic characters of specimens
were taken. The behavior of salamanders was studied
inside the cave and in the laboratory. On each visit the
total number of salamanders was counted from the
entrance to the end of the cave.
Preserved specimens of Batrachuperus persicus
studied for this research are as follows: ZMGU 67, 273,
Shirabad Cave collected by H. Naghghash and M.
Rahmani in 1994; ZMGU 246, 281, 282, 283, 284, near
Shirabad Cave collected by H. Kami, A. Maghsoudlou,
M. Rahmani, M. Azma on 10 July 1997; One specimen
without number collected in Shirabad Cave by A.
Maghsoudlou on 8 May 1998; ZMGU 267, Shirabad
Cave, collected by A. Maghsoudlou on 21 May; ZMGU
266, 268, 269, 270, 272, 285, 286, 427, 428, 429, col-
lected by H. Kami, M. Fatemi, N. Okhli, N.
Moghaddam, J. Ghasemi, M. Mahmoudi, R. Zakeri, on
19 May 1998; ZMGU 275, 430, Shirabad Cave, proba-
bly collected by H. Kami, S. Afzali, R. Ghaemi on 28
February 1997; ZMGU 276, Jahannama Protected Area,
south of Gorgan and Ziarat Spring of Khonakou, collect-
ed by N. Torbatinejad on 10 June 1997; ZMGU: 277,
278, Vantakhteh, collected by H. Kami, S. Afzali, M.
Firouznia, H. Rezaee, Y. Shakoumahalli, Y. Nariman, on
25 November 1996; ZMGU 279, 280 without correct
information (probably Vantakhteh or Shirabad); ZMGU
333, 335, Shirabad Cave, collected by M. Goli, S. Afzali
and eight other students of Gorgan University on 27
April 1999; ZMGU 343, Spring of Khouklou, collected
by H. Absalan, S. Hosseini, on 26 May 1999.
Vol. 10, p. 187
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
o
Is-
CN
Z>
o
N
Cl)
o
c
>
o
X2
0
T3
<
E
in
h"
=)
o
N
c
03
O — -
0-g
O 03
o I'
Q-S
0 Jl>
00
0
O
o
c
E
0
oo
o _0
CO =3
0
03
^ TO
<q o
? 0
0 ■-
Q_ II
O c
■Sl
03 O
-fc 0
0 *“
QQ j-'
o ^
Is
O 0
=3
"o ■g
ro >
o
CO 0
0 *7.
m ^
2 5
0 o
<-> 0
O C
To c6
>- 0
0 <-
c II
e™
0 c
g ro
i- 0
0 2
E c
o 0
f!
o 0
*> ^
in -o
<d.9>
_ i_
-Q T3
lE 0
Table 6. Summary of information on the feeding of B. per-
sicus in Golestan province of Iran. ZMGU 75 is from
Ardabil province.
Results
Measurements of specimens from the localities are pre-
sented in Table 3. Morphometric and ineristic characters
of preserved salamanders are summarized in Table 4 and
Table 5. The maximum total length of this species
expected 15-20 cm (Schmidtler and Schmidtler 1971).
The total length of the longest specimen was 268.5 mm.
Description of larvae. - In small larvae (Total length less
than 80-100 mm), the head is large, depressed, more or
less triangular with rounded end anteriorly, wider poste-
riorly, with small eyes and poorly developed eyelids;
black horny margin present in lower jaw; gills large;
vomerine tooth-bundle arc-shaped, situated anterolater-
ally, and extending in front of the choanae, short, in the
middle hardly discernibly separated from one another.
Trunk with 11-14 costal grooves, vertebral groove often
present, forelimbs are longer than hind limbs, tips of fin-
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 188
Figure 4. A- One of seven waterfalls of Shirabad Cave (Golestand Province, Iran). Batrachuperus persicus are found
in the water near the edges of the pond (Photo by R. Ghaemi 2/28/97); B- The entrance of Shirabad Cave (Photo by
R. Ghaemi 2/28/97); C- Myotis blythyi, an abundant bat species of Shirabad Cave and one of the food items of
Batrachuperus persicus ; D- Larval specimen of Batrachuperus persicus from Shirabad Cave collected 2/28/97 (Photo
by A. Sanee 3/11/1997); E- Juvenile specimen of Batrachuperus persicus about 10 days after metamorphosis.
Collected from Shirabad Cave 2/28/97 (Photo by A. Sanaee 4/8/97).
gers with black homy pads, their arrangements are
3>2>4>or<l; arrangement of toes are often 3>2>4>1;
adpressed limbs not overlapping; tail highly compressed
from laterally, upper caudal fin very distinct, reaching to
occiput in some specimens, lower caudal fin reaching to
posterior of cloaca, cloacal aperture is oval or elliptical.
In larger larvae the head is more or less rectangular,
adpressed limbs overlapping, upper and lower caudal
fins not clearly distinct. The 12 larvae specimens exam-
ined (fixed or living) in this study (see Tables 3, 4) have
a tail length which is smaller (Table 4) or longer (Table
3) than the head plus body length.
Description of juveniles. - Head more or less elliptical,
decreasing toward the rear, adpressed limbs overlap-
ping, upper and lower caudal fins are not distinct, tail
more or less rounded especially at base of it. Four juve-
nile specimens examined in this study (see Tables 3, 4),
have a tail length which is often smaller than the head
plus body length.
Description of adults. - Head form is more or less rec-
tangular, or wider anteriorly. Eyelids well developed and
movable, width of eyelid is less than distance of inter-
eyelids (interoculars), distance of external nostrils are
longer than distance of nostril to anterior of eye, nostrils
are semi-circle; vomerine tooth-bundle is different from
that of larvae, inner portion of it is longer than outer one.
Trunk with 11-14 costal grooves, adpressed limbs over-
lapping. Tail compressed laterally in some specimens
and with thin upper and lower caudal fins, and in some
specimens more or less rounded especially at base.
Cloacal aperture is longitudinal and in some specimens
cross-shaped, and longitudinal protuberance is present
inside of cloaca in others. The 16 adult specimens exam-
ined in this study (see Tables 3, 5) have a tail length
which is longer than head plus body length except two
specimens (ZMGU 273, 335) which have tail lengths
smaller than head plus body length.
Coloration - Small larvae (Total length 40 mm) are in
general light yellow without any distinct spots; dark
eyes very distinct in small larvae, larger larvae have
irregular dark gray spots, ventral portion of larvae light
and without spots; dorsum of ZMGU 285 is dark gray;
Iris yellowish, pupil dark, bases of all limbs yellow^e!-
low color of forelimbs not reaching to knee but in
hindlimbs reaching to knee. Yellow spots of larvae are
Vol. 10, p. 189
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
more than in adults. Juveniles are darker than larvae.
Yellow spots are less in adult, and ZMGU 269 is deep
violet and have only one yellow spot beside of vertebral
groove. Yellow spots of adults are often in vertebral
groove.
Feeding. - Batrachuperus persicus feeds on larvae and
adult forms of some orders of insects and probably other
arthropods. They also feed on bats ( Myotis blythyi) in
Shirabad Cave (Fig. 4). Some specimens are cannibalis-
tic and feed on smaller specimens of B. persicus espe-
cially in captivity. Algae, that may be eaten with other
insects, was found in one larva. Stomach is white with a
thin wall. Total length of digestive system of ZMGU 267
was 337 mm from anterior of stomach to posterior of
cloaca. Contents of stomachs of some dissected B. per-
sicus are shown in Table 6.
Behavior. - Small larvae and adult large salamanders are
usually almost motionless inside of cave. They have no
reaction to light. Adults escape to water. Adults swim
more slowly than larvae under water. Adults are active in
Shirabad Cave in all times of year but in other localities
are not active during the daytime.
Parasites. - Many nematodes and mastigophorans were
found inside the cloaca of one salamander from locality
2. Some nematodes moved freely and some were inside
of a cyst.
Metamorphosis. - Larvae are found at all times of the
year in Shirabad Cave and probably don’t transform dur-
ing the first year. A newly transformed juvenile was
found on February 25 1997. Larvae transform rapidly in
captivity probably as a result of starvation and higher
temperature.
Habitat. - Batrachuperus persicus was studied in four
localities and observed in some other localities in
Golestan Province of Iran. Larvae were found inside of
small shady ponds. Juveniles and adults were found
inside and outside of water in Shirabad Cave but in other
localities live in borrows about 20 cm long. Some spec-
imens found above stones, and some in grooves of
stones near water in Shirabad Cave. One specimen was
1 meter away of water and moved 0.5 meter on the stone
which was in an almost vertical position.
Measurements. - Measurements are summarized in
Tables 3, 4, and 5. Total length of the smallest larvae was
36.2 mm and of the longest one was 105 mm. Juveniles
are smaller than the largest larvae. Total length of the
longest adult was 268.5 mm.
Distribution. - Batrachuperus persicus collected or
observed by students of Gorgan University, staffs of
Department of Environment of Gorgan and Gonbad-e-
Kavous, and by me in many localities in Golestan
Province of Iran. These localities are listed on figure 2.
Discussion
These salamanders are active at all times of year in
Shirabad Cave, but in other localities found in borrows
of near of springs during daytimes and are probably
active at night. Larval salamanders have morphological
adaptations that correlate with the environments that the
larvae inhabit (Noble 1927 in Petranka 1988). One
dichotomy is that between species that typically breed in
running versus standing water habitats. In this division
larvae of Batrachuperus persicus are “stream-type” lar-
vae. A third group of aquatic larvae (“mountain brook”
larvae) was recognized by Valentine and Dennis (1964)
that is perhaps better viewed as an extreme form of the
stream-type morphology (Petranka, 1998). It is better
recognized larvae of B. persicus to this type of larvae.
Feeding on bats by adults of B. persicus may be unique
in the world of salamanders.
Acknowledgments
I am much indebted to N. Okhli for various assistance in
the field and in laboratory and typing the manuscript. I
would like to thank the students of Gorgan University
(M. Sabbaghpour, R. Ramezani, S. Afzali, S.Ashrafi, R.
Zakeri, M. Azma, M. Rahmani, H. Naghghash, G.
Daryanabard, H. Zohouri, A. Sanaee, A. Maghsoudlou,
M. Mahmoudi, J. Ghasemi, M. Goli) for their coopera-
tion during field work in Golestan Province and for tak-
ing the photographs. Thanks to staffs of Department of
Environment of Gorgan and Gonbad-e-Kavous especial-
ly R. Ghaemi, M. Firoznia Y. Shahkoumahalli and H.
Abslan for their cooperations. I am grateful 1 to N.
Abbasy and M. Fatemi, N. Moghaddam for identifica-
tion of plants and A. Abdoli for identification of water
insects. I am also thankful to T. Papenfuss, Museum of
Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley,
for all his recommendations, encouragements, and read-
ing the manuscript before publication.
Editor’s Note
The name Batrachuperus persicus Eiselt and Steiner,
1970. Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, 74:77 (Holotype:
NHMW 19435:4 [larval specimen], type locality:
Talysch Mountains near Assalem, Gilan Province, Iran,
small creek about 800 m) has priority over
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 190
Batrachuperus gorganensis Clerque-Gazeau and Thom,
1979. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Toulouse 114:455 (Holotype:
MNHMP 1978-1982, type locality: At the edge of a cav-
ernous stream on a clay bank 200 m inside the entrance
of a cave, situated between the village of Gorgan and
Ali-Abad, Elborz Mountain Range of north-central Iran,
near the southeast shore of the Caspian Sea and with an
elevation of 400 m above sea level). The type localities
of the two nominal taxa lie at the extreme western and
eastern ends respectively of the known Iranian range of
Batrachuperus. Most recent authors have considered the
two specimens conspecific and a small number of popu-
lations distributed between the two type localities have
been discovered. However, the taxonomic status of B.
gorganensis as well as that of intermediate populations
remains unsettled. Unsettled; see also discussion of the
problem in Ebrahimi et al. (2004). Indeed, Risch (1984,
Alytes, Paris 3:44) made B. gorganensis the type of his
monotypic genus, Paradactylodon. SCA
Literature Cited
Baloutch, M and H. G. Kami. 1995. Amphibians of Iran.
Tehran University Publication, Tehran. 177 pp.
(In Farsi).
Clergue-Gazeau, M. and R. Thom. 1979. Une nouvelle
espece de salamander du genere Batrachuperus in
provence de l’lran septentrional (Amphibia,
Caudata, Hynobiidae). Bulletin Societe d’Histoire
Naturellell4 (3/4):455-460, Toulouse.
Ebrahimi, M., H. G. Kami, and M. Stock. 2004. First
description of egg sacs and early larval develop-
ment in Hynobiid Salamanders (Urodela,
Hynobiidae, Batrachuperus) from north-eastern
Iran. Asiatic Herpetological Research 10:168-175.
Eiselt, J. and H. M. Steiner. 1970. Erstfund eines hyno-
biiden Molches in Iran. Annalen des
Naturhistorischen Museum Wien 74:77-90.
Kami, H. G. and E. Vakilpoure. 1996. Geographic distri-
bution of Batrachuperus persicus. Herpetological
Review 27 (3): 147.
Kami, H. G. 1999. Additional specimens of the Persian
Mountain Salamander, Batrachuperus persicus
from Iran (Amphibia: Hynobiidae). Zoology in the
Middle East 19:37-42.
Petranka, J. W. 1998. Salamanders of the United States
and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press,
Washington and London. 587 pp.
Schmidtler, J. J. and J. F. Schmidtler. 1971. Eine
Salamander- Novitat aus Persien, Batrachuperus
persicus. Aquarien Magazin 5(1 1). 443-445,
Stuttgart.
Steiner, H. M. 1973. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der
Verbreitung, Okologie und Bionomie von
Batrachuperus persicus. Salamandra 9:1-6.
Valentine, B. D. and D. M. Dennis. 1964. A comparison
of the gill-arch system and fins of three genera of
larval salamanders, Rhyacotriton, Gryinophilus,
and Ambystom a. Copeia 1964:196-201.
| 2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, pp. 191-201
Annotated Checklist of Amphibians and Reptiles of Pakistan
Muhammad Sharif Khan
Apt H A 17, 151-S. Bishop Ave., Secane, PA 19018, USA
E-mail: typhlops99@hotmail.com
Abstract. - From recent herpetological collections several new amphibian and reptilian taxa have been added to the
herpetofauna of Pakistan. Thus raising the number of species from Minton's 144 and Mertens' 178 to 225.
Key words. - Checklist, Pakistan, herpetofauna.
Introduction
Following is the checklist of amphibian and reptile
species that, so far, have been recorded and described in
the major works on the herpetology of the subcontinent
from the areas now included in Pakistan (Gunther, 1864;
Murray, 1884, 1886, 1892; Boulenger, 1890, 1896;
Smith, 1931, 1935, 1943). Recently described and
recorded species from Pakistan are also included in it
(Anderson and Leviton, 1966, 1967, 1969; Anderson
and Minton, 1963; Cherlin, 1981, 1983; Szczerbak,
1991; Golubev and Szczerbak, 1981; Ingoldby, 1922;
Mertens 1969a,b, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1974; Baig, 1988,
1989, 1998, 1999; Baig and Bohme, 1996; Baig and
Gvozdik, 1998; Dubois and Khan, 1979; Minton, 1966;
Minton and Anderson, J. 1965; Minton et al., 1970;
Khan, A. Q. and Khan, M.S. 1996; Khan, 1972, 1974,
1980, 1984a, b, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993a, b, 1994,
1997a, b,c, 1998, 1999a, b, 2000, 2001a, b, 2003a, b; Khan
and Baig, 1992; Khan and Khan, R.Z., 1997; Khan and
Tasnim, 1989, 1990; Khan and Rosier, 1999; Rastegar-
Pouyani, 1999.
Frogs and Toads
Bufo stomaticus Liitkin, 1 862
Bufo surdus Boulenger, 1891
Bufo viridis zugmayeri Eiselt and Schmidtler, 1973
Family: Microhylidae
Microhyla Tschudi, 1828
Microhyla ornata (Dumeril and Bibron, 1841)
Uperodon Dumeril and Bibron, 1841
Uperodon systoma (Schneider, 1799)
Family: Ranidae
Euphlyctis Fitzinger, 1843
Euphlyctis cyanophlyctis cyanophlyctis (Schneider,
1799)
Euphlyctis cyanophlyctis microspinulata Khan,
1997
Euphlyctis cyanophlyctis seistanica (Nikolsky, 1900)
Family: Bufonidae
Bufo Laurenti, 1768
Bufo himalayanus Gunther, 1 864
Bufo latastii Boulenger, 1882
Bufo melanostictus hazarensis Khan, 200 1
Bufo olivaceus Blanford, 1874
Bufo pseudoraddei pseudoraddei Mertens, 1971
Bufo pseudoraddei baturae Stock, Schmid,
Steinlein, and Grosse, 1999
Bufo siacheninsis Khan, 1997
Hoplobatrachus Peters, 1 863
Hoplobatrachus tigerinus (Daudin, 1802)
Fejervarya Bolkay, 1915
Fejervarya limnocharis (Boie, 1834)
Fejervarya syhadrensis ( Annandale, 1919)
Nanorana Gunther, 1836
Nanorana pleskei (Gunther, 1896)
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 192
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Paa Dubois, 1975
Paa barmoachensis (Khan and Tasnim, 1989)
Paa hazarensis Dubois and Khan, 1979
Paa sternosignata (Murray, 1885)
Paa vicina (Stoliczka, 1872)
Sphaerotheca Dumeril and Bibron, 1841.
Sphaerotheca breviceps (Schneider, 1799)
Turtles and Tortoises
Family: Cheloniidae
Caretta Rafiuesque, 1814
Caretta caretta (Linnaeus, 1758)
Chelonia Brongniart, 1800
Chelonia my das (Linnaeus, 1758)
Eretmochelys Fitzinger, 1843
Eretmochelys imbricata (Linnaeus, 1766)
Lepidoc/ielys Fitzinger, 1843
Lepidochelys olivacea (Eschscholtz, 1824)
Family: Dermochelyidae
Dermochelys Blainville, 1816
Dermochelys coriacea (Vandelli, 1761)
Family: Emydidae
Geoclemys (Gray, 1821)
Geoclemys hamiltonii (Gray, 1821)
Har della Gray, 1870
Hardella thurjii Gray, 1 870
Kachuga Gray, 1856
Kachuga smithii (Gray, 1 863)
Kachuga tecta (Gray, 1831)
Family: Testudinidae
Agrionemys Khozatsky and Mlynarsky, 1966
Agrionemys horsfieldii (Gray, 1844)
Geochelone Fitzinger, 1835
Geochelone elegans (SchopfF, 1792)
Family: Trionychidae
Aspideretes Hay, 1835
Aspideretes gangeticus (Cuvier, 1 825)
Aspideretes hurum (Gray, 1831)
Chitra Gray, 1 844
Chitra indica (Gray, 1831)
Lissemys Smith, 1 93 1
Lissemys punctata andersoni Webb, 1980
Crocodiles and Gavials
Family: Crocodylidae
Crocodylus Laurenti, 1768
Crocodylus palustris Lesson, 1831
Family: Gavialidae
Gavialis Oppel, 1811
Gavialis gangeticus (Gmelin, 1789)
Lizards
Family: Agamidae
Brachysaura Blyth, 1856
Brachysaura minor (Hardwicke and Gray, 1827)
Cables Cuvier, 1817
Calotes versicolor versicolor (Daudin, 1 802)
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 193
Calotes versicolor farooqi Auffenberg and Rehman,
1995
Japalura Gray, 1853
Japalura kumaonensis (Annandale, 1907)
Laudakia Gray, 1845
Laudakia agrorensis (Stoliczka, 1872)
Laudakia badakhshana (Anderson and Leviton, 1969)
Laudakia caucasia (Eichwald, 1831)
Laudakia fusca (Blanford, 1876)
Laudakia himalayana (Steindachner, 1869)
Laudakia lirata (Blanford, 1874)
Laudakia melanura nasiri Baig, 1999
Laudakia melanura melanura Blyth, 1854
Laudakia microlepis (Blanford, 1874)
Laudakia nupta (de Filippi, 1843)
Laudakia nuristanica (Anderson and Leviton, 1969)
Laudakia pakistanica (Baig, 1989)
Laudakia pakistanica auffenbergi Baig and Bohme,
1996
Laudakia pakistanica khani Baig and Bohme, 1996
Laudakia tuberculata (Hardwicke and Gray, 1827)
Phrynocephalus Kaup, 1 825
Phrynocephalus clarkorum (Anderson and Leviton,
1967)
Phrynocephalus euptilopus Alcock and Finn, 1896
Phrynocephalus luteoguttatus Boulenger, 1887
Phrynocephalus maculatus Anderson, 1 872
Phrynocephalus ornatus Boulenger, 1 887
Phrynocephalus scutellatus Olivier, 1807
Trapelus Cuvier, 1816
Trapelus agilis Olivier, 1804
Trapelus agilis agilis (Olivier, 1804)
Trapelus agilis pakistanensis Rastegar-Pouyani, 1999
Trapelus megalonyx Gunther, 1 864
Trapelus rubrigular is Blanford, 1876
Trapelus ruderatus baluchianus (Smith, 1935)
Family: Chameleonidae
Chamaeleo Laurenti, 1768
Chamaeleo zeylanicus Laurenti, 1768
Family: Eublepharidae
Eublepliaris Gray, 1 827
Eublepharis macularius (Blyth, 1854)
Family: Gekkonidae
Agamura Blanford, 1 874
Agamura persica (Dumeril, 1856)
Altigekko M.S. Khan, 2003
Altigekko baturensis (Khan and Baig, 1992)
Altigekko boehmei (Szczerbak, 1991)
Altigekko stoliczkai (Steindachner, 1 869)
Bunopus Blanford, 1874
Bunopus tuberculatus Blanford, 1874
Crossobamon Boettger, 1888
Crossobamon lumsdeni (Boulenger, 1887)
Crossobamon maynardi (Smith, 1933)
Crossobamon orientalis (Blanford, 1876)
Cyrtopodion Fitzinger, 1843
Cyrtopodion agamuroides (Nikolsky, 1900)
Cyrtopodion kachhense kachhense (Stoliczka, 1872)
Cyrtopodion kachhense ingoldbyi Khan, 1997
Cyrtopodion kohsulaimanai (Khan, 199 Id)
Cyrtopodion montiumsalsorum { Annandale, 1913)
Cyrtopodion potoharensis Khan, 2001
Vol. 10, p. 194
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Cyrtopodion scabrum (Heyden, 1 827)
Cyrtopodion watsoni (Murray, 1 892)
Hemidactylus Oken, 1817
Hemidactylus brookii Gray, 1845
Hemidactylus flaviviridis RUppell, 1835
Hemidactylus frenatus Schlegel, 1836
Hemidactylus leschenaultii Dumeril and Bibron, 1836
Hemidactylus persicus J. Anderson, 1872
Hemidactylus triedrus (Daudin, 1802)
Hemidactylus turcicus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Indogekko M.S. Khan, 2003
Indogekko fortmunroi (Khan, 1993)
Indogekko indusoani (Khan, 1980)
Indogekko rhodocaudus (Baig, 1998)
Indogekko rohtasfortai (Khan and Tasnim, 1990)
Mediodactylus Szczerbak and Golubev, 1977
Indogekko walli (Ingoldby, 1 922)
Ptyodactylus Goldfuss, 1820
Ptyodactylus homolepis Blanford, 1876
Rhinogecko de Witte, 1973
Rhinogecko femoralis (Smith, 1933)
Rhinogecko misonnei de Witte, 1973
Siwaligekko M. S. Khan, 2003
Siwaligekko battalensis (Khan, 1993)
Siwaligekko dattanensis (Khan, 1980)
Siwaligekko mintoni (Golubev and Szczerbak, 1981)
Teratolepis Gunther, 1 870
Teratolepis fasciata { Blyth, 1853)
Teratoscincus Strauch, 1863
Teratoscincus microlepis Nikolsky, 1899
Teratoscincus scincus (Schlegel, 1858)
Teratoscincus scincus keyserlingi Strauch, 1 863
Tropiocolotes Peters, 1880
Tropiocolotes depressus Minton and J. A. Anderson,
1965
Tropiocolotes persicus persicus (Nikolsky, 1903)
Tropiocolotes persicus euphorbiacola Minton, S.
Anderson, and J. A. Anderson, 1970
Family: Lacertidae
Acanthodactylus Wiegmann, 1834
Acanthodactylus blanfordii Boulenger, 1918
Acanthodactylus cantoris Gunther, 1 864
Acanthodactylus micropholis Blanford, 1874
Eremias Wiegmann, 1 834
Eremias acutirostris (Boulenger, 1887)
Eremias aporosceles (Alcock and Finn, 1896)
Eremias fasciata Blanford, 1874
Eremias persica Blanford, 1874
Eremias scripta (Strauch, 1867)
Mesalina G ray, 1838
Mesalina brevirostris Blanford, 1874
Mesalina watsonana (Stoliczka, 1872)
Ophisops Menetries, 1832
Ophisops elegans Menetries, 1832
Ophisops jerdonii Blyth, 1853
Family: Scincidae
Ablepharus Fitzinger, 1823
Ablepharus gray anus (Stoliczka, 1872)
Ablepharus pannonicus (Fitzinger, 1823)
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 195
Chalcides Laurenti, 1768
Chalcides ocellatus (Forskal, 1775)
Eurylepis Blyth, 1854
Eurylepis taeniolatus taeniolatus (Blyth, 1854)
Lygosoma Hardwick and Gray, 1827
Lygosoma punctata (Linnaeus, 1766)
Mabuya Fitzinger, 1826
Mabuya dissimilis (Hallowed, 1860)
Mabuya macular i a (Blyth, 1853)
Novoeumeces Griffith, Ngo, and Murphy, 2000
Novoeumeces blythianus (J. Anderson, 1871)
Novoeumeces indothalensis (M.S. Khan and M.R.Z.
Khan, 1997)
Novoeumeces schneider ii zarudnyi (Nikolsky, 1900)
Ophiomorus Dumeril and Bibron, 1839
Ophiomorus blanfordi Boulenger, 1887
Ophiomorus brevipes (Blanford, 1874)
Ophiomorus raithmai S. Anderson and Leviton, 1966
Ophiomorus tridactylus (Blyth, 1853)
Scincella Mittleman, 1950
Scincella himalayana (Gunther, 1 864)
Scincella ladacensis (Gunther, 1864)
Family: Uromastycidae
Uromastyx Merrem, 1 820
Uromastyx asmussi (Strauch, 1 863)
Uromastyx hardwickii Gray, 1 827
Family: Varanidae
Varanus Merrem, 1820
Varanus bengalensis (Daudin, 1 802)
Varanus flavescens (Hardwicke and Gray, 1 827)
Varanus griseus (Daudin, 1803)
Varanus griseus caspius (Eichwald, 1831)
Varanus griseus koniecznyi Mertens, 1954
Ophidia: Snakes
Family: Leptotyphlopidae
Leptotyphlops Fitzinger, 1843
Leptotyphlops blanfordii (Boulenger, 1890)
Leptotyphlops macrorhynchus (Jan, 1 862)
Family: Typhlopidae
Ramphotyphlops Fitzinger, 1843
Ramphotyphlops braminus (Daudin, 1803)
Typhlops Oppel, 1811
Typhlops ahsanai M.S. Khan, 1999
Typhlops diardii Schlegel, 1839
Typhlops diardii platyventris M.S. Khan, 1998
Typhlops ductuliformes M.S. Khan, 1999
Typhlops madgemintonai madgemintonai M.S. Khan,
1999
Typhlops madgemintonai shermanai M.S. Khan, 1999
Family: Boidae
Eryx Daudin, 1803
Eryx conicus (Schneider, 1801)
Eryx johnii (Russell, 1801)
Eryx tataricus speciosus Zarevsky, 1915
Python Daudin, 1803
Python molurus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Family: Colubridae
Amphiesma Dumeril, Bibron and Dumeril, 1854
Vol. 10, p. 196
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 197
Telescopus Wagner, 1830
Telescopus rhinopoma (Blanford, 1874)
Xenochrophis Gunther, 1864
Xenochrophis cerasogaster cerasogaster (Cantor, 1839)
Xenochrophis piscator piscator ( Schneider, 1799)
Xenochrophis sanctijohannis (Boulenger, 1 890)
Family: Elapidae
Bungarus Daudin, 1803
Bungarus caerulens caeruleus (Schneider, 1801)
Bungarus sindanus razai M. S. Khan, 1985
Bungarus sindanus sindanus Boulenger, 1847
Naja Laurenti, 1768
Najanaja (Linnaeus, 1758)
Naja oxiana (Eichwald, 1831)
Family: Hydrophiidae
Astrotia Fisher, 1856
Astrotia stokesii (Gray, 1 846)
Enhydrina Gray, 1849
Enhydrina schistosa (Daudin, 1803)
Hydrophis Latreille, 1802
Hydrophis caerulescens (Shaw, 1 802)
Hydrophis cyanocinctus Daudin, 1 803
Hydrophis fasciatus (Schneider, 1799)
Hydrophis lapemoides (Gray, 1 849)
Hydrophis mamillaris (Daudin, 1 803)
Hydrophis ornatus (Gray, 1 842)
Hydrophis spiralis (Shaw, 1 802)
Lapemis Gray, 1835
Lapemis curtus (Shaw, 1 802)
Microcephalophis Lesson, 1834
Microcephalophis cantoris (Gunther, 1 864)
Microcephalophis gracilis (Shaw, 1802)
Pelamis Daudin, 1803
Pelamis platurus (Linnaeus, 1766)
Pr aes cut at a Wall, 1921
Praescutata viperina (Ph. Schmidt, 1852)
Family: Viperidae
Daboia Gray, 1842
Daboia russelii russelii (Shaw and Nodder, 1797)
Echis Merrem, 1 820
Echis carinatus (Schneider, 1 820)
Echis carinatus astolae Mertens, 1969
Echis carinatus multisquamatus Cherlin, 1981
Echis carinatus sochureki Stemmier, 1964
Eristicophis Alcock and Finn, 1896
Eristicophis macmahonii Alcock and Finn, 1897
Macrovipera Reuss, 1 927
Macroviper a lebetina obtusa (Dwigubsky, 1832
Pseudocerastes Boulenger, 1 896
Pseudocerastes bicornis Wall, 1913
Pseudocerastes persicus (Dumeril, Bibron, and
Dumeril, 1854)
Family: Crotalidae
Gloydius Hoge and Romano-Hoge, 1981
Gloydius himalayanus (Gunther, 1864)
Vol. 10, p. 198
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Literature Cited
Anderson, S. C. and A. E. Leviton. 1966. A review of the
genus Ophiomorus (Sauria: Scincidae), with
descriptions of three new forms. Proceedings
California Academy of Sciences. 4th Ser. 33:499-
534.
Anderson, S. C. and A. E. Leviton, 1967. A new species
of Eremias (Reptilia: Lacertidae) from Afghanistan.
Proceedings California Academy of Sciences
(64): 1-4.
Anderson, S. C. and A. E. Leviton. 1969. Amphibians
and reptiles collected by the Street Expedition
to Afghanistan, 1965. Proceedings California
Academy of Sciences, (4th Ser.) 37:25-56.
Anderson, S. C., and S. A. Minton. 1963. Two notewor-
thy herpetological records from the Thar Parker
Desert, West Pakistan. Herpetologica, 19:152.
Baig, K. J. 1988. New record of Agama nuristanica
(Sauria:Agamidae) from Pakistan. Biologia
(Lahore) 34:199-200.
Baig, K.J. 1989. A new species of Agama (Sauria,
Agamidae) from northern Pakistan. Bulletin
Kitakyushu Museum Natural History 9:117-122.
Baig, K. J. 1998. A new species of Tenuidactylus
(Sauria: geckonidae) from Balochistan, Pakistan.
Hamadryad 23(2): 127-132.
Baig, K. J. 1999. Description and ecology of a new sub
species of black rock agama, Laudakia melanura
(Sauria: Agamidae) from Balochistan, Pakistan.
Russian Journal of Herpetology 6(2):81-86.
Baig, K.J. and W. Bohme. 1996. Description of two new
subspecies of Laudakia pakistanica (Sauria:
Agamidae). Russian Journal Herpetology 3:1-10.
Baig, K.J. and L. Gvozdik. 1998. Uperodon systoma
Schneider: record of a new microhylid frog from
Pakistan. Pakistan Journal Zoology 30:155-156.
Boulenger, G. A. 1890. Fauna of British India, including
Ceylon and Burma. Reptilia and Batrachia.
London.
Boulenger, G. A. 1896. On the lizards of the genus
Eremias , section Boulengerina. Proceedings of the
Zoological Society of London, 1896:920-930.
Boulenger, G. A. (1897): A new krait from Sind
( Bungarus sindanus). Journal Bombay Natural
History Society 9:73-74.
Cherlin, V. A. 1981. A new saw-scaled viper, Echis mul-
tisquamatus, sp. nov. from southwestern and
Middle Asia. Trudy, Zoology Institut Akademy
Nauk USSR, Leningrd 101:92-95.
Cherlin, V. A. 1983. New facts on the taxonomy of
snakes of the genus Echis. Vest. Zool. 1983:42-46.
(English tranalation: Smithsonian Herpetological
Information Ser. No. 61, 1984).
Dubois, A. and Khan, M. S. 1979. A new species of
frog (genus Rana , subgenus Pad) from northern
Pakistan (Amphibia, Anura). Journal Herpetology
13:403-410
Fitzinger, L. J. 1823. In: Lichtenstein, M. H. C.,
Verzeichniss der Doubletten des zoologischen
Museums. ..Universitat zu Berlin nebst
Beschreibung vieler biserunbekannter Arten von
Saugethieren, Vogeln, Amphibien und Fischen.
Berlin.
Fitzinger, L. J. 1843. Systema reptilium. Fasciculus
Primus. Vienna.
Fiihn, I. E. 1969. Revision and Redefinition of the genus
Ablepharus Lichtenstein, 1823 (Reptilia,
Scincidae). Revue Rouma. De Biologia, ser. Zool.,
14:23-41.
Golubev, M, and N. Szczerbak. 1981. A new species of
Genus Gymnodactylus Spix, 1823 (Reptilia, Sauria,
Gekkonidae) - from Pakistan Vestnik Zoology, 1981
(3):40-45.
Griffith, H., A. Ngo, and R.W. Murphy. (2000): A cladis-
tic evaluation of the cosmopolitan genus Eumeces
Wiegmann (Reptilia, Squamata, Scincidae).
Russian Journal Herpetology, Moscow; 7(1): 1-1 6.
Gunther, A. 1 864. The reptiles of British India. Oxford
& IBH Publishing Co. Bombay.
Ingoldby, C.M. 1922. A new stone gecko from
Himalayas. Journal Bombay Natural History
Society 28:1051.
Jan, . 1865. In: De-Filippi, Viagg. in Persia 356.
Khan, A.Q. and M.S. Khan, 1996. Snakes of State of
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 199
Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Proc. Pakistan
Zoological Congress 16:173-182.
Khan, M. S. 1980. A new species of gecko from north-
ern Pakistan. Pakistan Journal Zoology 12(1): 11-
16.
Khan, M. S. 1984a. Validity of the natricine taxon Natrix
sancti-johannis Boulenger. Journal Herpetology
18:198-200.
Khan, M. S. 1984b. Rediscovery and validity of
Bungarus sindamts Boulenger. The Snake 16:43-
48.
Khan, M. S. 1985b. Taxonomic notes on Bungarus
caeruleus Schneider and Bungarus sindanus
Boulenger. The Snake 17:71-78.
Khan, M. S. 1988. A new Cyrtodactylid gecko from
northwestern Punjab, Pakistan. Journal
Herpetology 22:241-243.
Khan, M. S. 1989. Rediscovery and redescription of the
highland ground gecko, Tenuidactylus montiumsal-
sorum Annandale, 1913. Herpetologica 45:46-54.
Khan, M. S. 1991 d. A new Tenuidactylus gecko from
the Sulaiman Range, Punjab, Pakistan. Journal
Herpetology 25:199-204.
Khan, M. S. 1992. Validity of the mountain gecko
Gymnodactylus walli Ingoldby, 1922. Herptology
Journal 2:106-109.
Khan, M. S. 1993a. A new angular-toed gecko from
Pakistan, with remarks on the taxonomy and a key
to the species belonging to genus Cyrtodactylus
(Reptilia: Sauria: Geckkonidae). Pakistan Journal of
Zoology 25:67-73.
Khan, M. S. 1993b. A new sandstone gecko from Fort
Munro, Dera Ghazi Khan district, Punjab, Pakistan.
Pakistan Journal of Zoology 25:217-221.
Khan, M. S. 1994. Validity and redescription of
Tenuidactylus yarkandensis (J. Anderson, 1872).
Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 26(2): 139-143.
Khan, M. S. 1997a. A new toad from the foot of Siachin
Glacier, Baltistan, northeastern Pakistan. Pakistan
Journal Zoology 29(l):43-48.
Khan, M. S. 1997b. A new subspecies of common skit-
tering frog Euphlyctis cyanophlyctis (Schneider,
1799) from Balochistan, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal
Zoology 29(2): 107- 112.
Khan, M. S. 1997c. Validity, generic redesignation, and
taxonomy of western rock gecko Gymnodactylus
ingoldby i Proctor, 1923. Russian Journal
Herpetology 4(2):83-88.
Khan, M. S. 1998. Notes on Typhlops diardi Schlegel,
1839, with description of a new subspecies (squa-
mata, Serpentes, Scolecophidia). Pakistan Journal
Zoology 30(3):2 13-221.
Khan, M. S. 1999a. New species of blind snakes of
genus Typhlops from Azad Kashmir and Punjab,
Pakistan (Serpentes: Typhlopidae). Russian Journal
of Herpetology, 6(3):23 1-240.
Khan, M. S. 1999b. Typhlops ductuliformes, a new
species of blind snakes from Pakistan and a note on
T. porrectus Stoliczka, 1871, (Squamata, Serpentes,
Scolecophidia). Pakistan Journal of Zoology,
3 1 (4):3 85-390.
Khan, M. S. 2000. Redescription and generic redesigna-
tion of Gymnodactylus stoliczkai Steindachner,
1869. Pakistan Journal Zoology 32(2): 157-163.
Khan, M. S. 2001a. Taxonomic notes on angular-toed
gekkota of Pakistan, with description of a new
species of genus Cyrtopodion. Pakistan Journal
Zoology 33(1): 13-24.
Khan, M. S. 2001b. Notes on Cranial-Ridged Toads of
Pakistan and Description of a new subspecies
(Amphibia: Bufonidae). Pakistan Journal of
Zoology 33(4):293-298.
Khan, M. S. 2003a. Notes on circum Indus geckos of
genus Cyrtopodion (Squamata: Gekkonidae).
Gekkota 4:
Khan, M. S. 2003b. Questions of generic designation of
angular-toed geckos of Pakistan with descriptions
of three new genera (Reptilia: Gekkonidae). Journal
of Natural History and Wildlife (Karachi), Vol. 2
(2):9-29.
Khan, M. S„ and K. J. Baig. 1992. A new tenuidactylid
gecko from northeastern Gilgit Agency, North
Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 24:273-277.
Vol. 10, p. 200
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Khan, M. S. and M. R. Z. Khan. 1997. A new skink from
the Thai Desert of Pakistan. Asiatic Herpetological
Research 7:61-67.
Khan, M. S., and R. Tasnim. 1989. A new frog of the
genus Rana , subgenus Paa, from southwestern
Azad Kashmir. Journal Herpetology 23:419-423.
Khan, M. S., and R. Tasnim. 1990. A new gecko of the
genus Tenuidactylus from northeastern Punjab,
Pakistan, and southwestern Azad Kashmir.
Herpetologica 46:142-148.
Khan, M. S., and Khan, A. Q. 2000. Three new
subspecies of snakes of genus Coluber from
Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 32(1 ):49-
52.
Khozatsky, L.I., and M. Mlynarski. 1966. Agrionemys -
nouveau genre de tortues terrestres [Testudinidae].
Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci. Ser. Sci. Biol., [2]: 123-125.
Leviton, A., and Anderson, S. C. 1972. Description of a
new species of Tropiocolotes (Reptiliua: geck-
onidae) with a revised key to the genus. Occasional
Papers of the California Academy of Science 96:1-
7.
Malnate, E. V. 1966. Amphiesma platyceps (Blyth) and
Amphieasma sieboldii (Gunther): sibling species
(Reptilia:Serpentes). Journal of Bombay Natural
History Society 63:1-17.
Malnate, E. V., and S. A. Minton. 1965. A redescription
of the natricine snake Xenochrophis cerasogaster,
with comments on its taxonomic status.
Proceedings of Academy National Science,
Philadelphia 117:19-43.
Mertens, R. 1954. Uber die Rassen des Wustenwarans
( Varanus griseus ). Senckenberg Biology 35:353-
357.
Mertens, R. 1969a. Die Amphibien und Reptilien West-
Pakistans. Stuttgart Beitrag Naturkundi 197:1-96.
Mertens, R. 1969b. Eine neue Rasse der
Dachschildkrote, Kachuga tecta. Seckenberg
Biology 50:23-30.
Mertens, R. 1970. Die Amphibien und Reptilien West-
Pakistans. Stuttgart Beitrag Naturkundi 216:1-5.
Mertens, R. 1971. Die Amphibien und Reptilien West-
Pakistans. 2. Nachtrag. Senckenberg Biology52(l-
2):7-15.
Mertens, R. 1972. Nachtrage zum Krokodil-Katalog der
senckenbergischen Sammlungen. 3. Nachtrag.
Senck. biol. 53:21-35.
Mertens, R. 1974. Die Amphibien und Reptilien West-
Pakistans. Senckenb. biol. 55(l-3):35-38.
Minton, S. A. 1966. A contribution to the herpetology of
West Pakistan. Bulletin of the American Museum of
Natural History 1 34(2):3 1-1 84.
Minton, S. A. 1966. A contribution to the herpetology of
West Pakistan. Bulletin American Museum of
Natural History 1 34(2):3 1-1 84.
Minton, S. A., and Anderson, S. 1965. A new dwarf
gecko ( Tropiocolotes ) from Baluchistan.
Herpetological 21:59-61.
Minton, S. A., S. Anderson, and J. A. Anderson. 1970.
Remarks on some geckos from Southwest Asia,
with description of three new forms and a key to the
genus Tropiocoloties. Proceedings of the California
Academy Sciences, (4th Ser.) 37:333-362.
Murray, J. A. 1884. The vertebrate zoology of Sind.
London & Bombay.
Murray, J. A. 1886. The zoology of Sind. London &
Bombay.
Murray, J. A. 1892. The zoology of Baloochistan and
southern Afghanistan. London & Bombay.
Rastegar-Pouyani, N. 1999. Two new subspecies of
Trapelus agilis complex (Sauria:Agamidae) from
lowland southwestern Iran and southeastern
Pakistan. Asiatic Herpetological Research 8:90-
101.
Schmidtler, J. J. and J. F. Schmidtler. 1969. Uber Bufo
surdus; mit einem Schlussel und Anmerkungen zu
den ubrigen Kroten Irans und West-Pakistans.
Salamandra 5:113-123.
Schatti, B., and U. Utiger. 2001. Hemerophis, a new
genus for Zamenis socotrae Gunther, and a contri-
bution to the phylogeny of Old World racers, whip
snakes, and related genera (Reptilia: Squamata:
Colubrinae). Revue Suisse de Zoologie 1 08(4) 91 9-
948.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 201
Smith, M. A. 1931. The fauna of British India, including
Ceylon and Burma. Reptilia and amphibia. Vol. I:
Loricata, Testudines. Taylor and Francis Ltd.
London.
Smith, M. A. 1935. The Fauna of British India, includ-
ing Ceylon and Burma. Reptilia and amphibia. Vol.
II: Sauria. Taylor and Francis Ltd. London.
Smith, M. A. 1943. The fauna of British India, Ceylon,
and Burma. Reptilia and amphibia. Vol.
IILSerpentes. Taylor and Francis, London.
Steindachner, F. 1869. Reptilia. In: Reise der osterre
ichischen Fregatte Novara. ..Zoologischer
Theil. Vienna, 1:1-98.
Stock, M., M. Schmid, C. Steinlein, and W. R. Grosse.
1999. Mosaicism in somatic triploid specimens of
the Bufo viridis complex in the Karakoram with
examination of calls, morphology and taxonomic
conclusions. Italian Journal of Zoology 66:215-32.
Szczerbak, N. N. 1991. Eine neue Gecko-Art aus
Pakistan: Alsophylax ( Altiphylax ) boehmi sp. nov.
Salamandra 27(l):53-57.
Tuck, R. G. 1971. Rediscovery and redescription of the
Khuzistan dwarf gecko Microgecko helenae
Nikolsky (Sauria:Geckkonidae). Proceedings of the
Biological Society of Washington 83:477-482.
Webb, R. G. 1980. The identity of Testudo punctata
Lacepede, 1788 (Testudines, Trionychidae).
Bulletin du Museum National d’Flistoire Naturelle.
Paris. 4(2):547-557.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol.10, pp. 202-207
A Morphological and Taxonomic Study on Lacerta parva Boulenger, 1887
(Sauria: Lacertidae) from West Taurus, Turkey
Y. KUMLUTA^1’*, S. H. Durmu^1, Y. Kaska2 , M. Oz3 AND M. R. TUNg3
' Dokuz Eyliil Universitesi, Buca Egitim Fakiiltesi, Biyoloji A.B.D. Buca- / zmir, Turkey.
2 Pamukkale Universitesi, Fen-Edebiyat Fakiiltesi, Biyoloji Boliimu Denizli-Turkey.
J A kdeniz Universitesi, Fen-Edebiyat Fakiiltesi, Biyoloji Boliimii Antalya-Turkey.
jjj
To whom correspondence should be addressed E-mail: yusuf.kumlutas@deu.edu.tr
Abstract. - The morphometric measurements of taxonomically important characters, coloration, and pholidosis fea-
tures of 74 Lacerta parva specimens collected from West Taurus, Turkey were investigated. Statistical analyses were
done and these results were compared with those from relevant literature. Some of the characters were found to be
different on the specimens from different localities. New localities from southwest Turkey were also discovered dur-
ing this study.
Key words. - Lacerta parva, West Taurus, Turkey.
Introduction
Lacerta parva was first identified as a new species
based on a female specimen collected from Kayseri,
Turkey (Boulenger, 1887). In later studies, the distribu-
tion of this species was extended to include all of Anato-
lia and the Caucasian region (Werner, 1902; Nesterow,
1912; Nikolsky, 1915; Bird, 1936; Bodenheimer, 1944;
Mertens, 1952; Ba§oglu and Baran, 1977; Baran et al.,
1992; Baran and Atatiir, 1998). The distribution of this
species was extended to Europe by giving the locality
from Tekirdag, Turkey (Venchi-Bologna, 1996).
Peters (1962) compared the variations and similari-
ties between Caucasian and Anatolian populations by
examining the 131 and 74 specimens, respectively.
Atagiin (1984) also did a comparative study on the 208
specimens collected from six different sub-populations
(Fethiye, Denizli, Konya, Ankara, Kayseri, Erzurum)
from Anatolia. Recently, Mtilayim et al. (2001) studied
46 specimens collected from Golka§i Village, Bey^ehir-
Konya and found much more similarities between
Konya and Fethiye populations as previously mentioned
by Atagiin (1984).
This work investigates the distribution of this spe-
cies in the west of Turkey and also provides morpho-
metrical comparison of these specimens with previously
collected specimens and relevant literature. We try to
resolve the taxonomical situation of the sub-populations
of Lacerta parva in Anatolia.
Material and Methods
Most of the specimens were obtained from Taurus,
southwest of Anatolia. A sum of 22 male, 38 female and
14 juvenile specimens were collected. These specimens,
collected during the years of 1995-1997, were kept at
ZDEU (Zoology Department of Ege University). The
locations where the samples were collected are given in
Figure 1. The list of material is given below as the
Departmental Identification Code, sex, number of speci-
mens, locality, date, initials, and surname of the collec-
tors respectively.
List of Material
1) 140 / 1995, 1 male, Bey§ehir, 19.09.1995, Leg. M.
Oz.
2) 238 / 1996 1-9 males, 10-22 females, Bozhoyiik
Ovacik-Elmali, 18.06.1996, Leg. Y. Kumluta§ , R.
Tun9, S. H. Durmu§ .
3) 239 / 1996, 1-5, 6-13, 14-27 Juv., gayryakas -
Gazipa^a, 23.08.1996, Leg. Y. Kumluta§, M. Oz, R.
Tun?.
4) 163 / 1997, 1-7, 8-24 , Beyobasi, 25.06.1997, Leg. Y.
Kumluta§, M. Oz, R. Tun?.
Coloration of living specimens was determined by
eye, slides were taken, and then the specimens fixed
with the traditional processes and kept in 70% alcohol.
The morphometric measurements were done with a dig-
ital calliper with an accuracy of 0.02 mm. The body
Measurements taken and their descriptions and indexes
of the characters are as follows. Pileus Width (PW):
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol.10, p. 203
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Figure 1. The distribution of Lacerta parva in Turkey.
Collection localities in this study. Refer to the materials list for details.
Collection localities from literature (Peters, 1962; Atagiin, 1984; Ba§oglu-Baran, 1977;
Baran et al. , 1992; Venchi-Bologna, 1996; and Miilayim et al. , 2001).
The widest distance between the parietal plates. Pileus
Length (PL): The distance from the posterior point of
parietal plates to the tip of rostrum. Head and Body
Length (HBL): The distance between the front tip of
rostrum and front edge of anus. Body Length (BL): The
total length of body from tip of rostrum to the end of
tail. Tail Length (TL): The length of tail from anus to
the tip of tail. Forelimb Length (FL): The length of
forelimb from the body connection to the tip of longest
finger. Hind-limb Length(HL): The length of hind
limb from the body connection to the tip of fourth fin-
ger. Pileus Index (PI)=PW/PLxl00, Tail Index
(TI)=TL/BLxl00 and Forelimb Index (FI)=FL/
BLxlOO were also calculated. The ANOVA statistical
test were used in comparison of the measurements and
the ratios (Minitab, 1991). The values of “Coefficient of
difference (CD)” were used in comparison of some
characteristics among the population (Mayr, 1969).
Results
Pholidosis and Morphometric Measurements
2004
Table 1 : The results of descriptive statistics on some of the characteristics of L. parva specimens (These measurem
are given as miiimeter).
Rostrale were connected to the nostril and the numbers
of postnasal plate were occasionally two (96%), only
one (3%) in two specimens and one specimen had one
on the left and two on the right. The number of occipital
plates were also commonly one (97%) but divided into
two in two (3%) specimens. The numbers of supercili-
ary plates was five in 44 specimens (59.4%), six in 23
specimens (31.1%), four in four specimens (5.4%),
seven in two specimens (2.7%) and nine in one speci-
men (1.4%). The numbers of supralabial plates, in front
of the subocular plate, was usually four (74.3%); three
in two specimens (2.7%); four (one small and three big)
in three specimens (4.05%); five in two specimens as
two small and three big ones; four big and one small in
six (8.1%) other specimens; six (four big and two small)
in two specimens, seven (four big and three small) in
two specimens. The distal end of the collaria was jagged
in shape and the numbers varied between five and eight
with a mean of 6.7. The results from statistical analyses
of the above mentioned measurements are presented in
Table 1; comparative results with other literature are
presented in Table 2. There were no statistical differ-
ences (F-test, P>0.05) between the specimens collected
from different locations in this study.
Although the T-test does not show any statistical
differences (P>0.05) between males and females, males
have relatively higher values than females. For example,
the mean length of the pileus was 11.15 (Min.= 9.64 -
Max =16.60) in males and 9.99 (8.72 - 11.50) in
females. The coefficient of differences (CD) was 0.59.
The width of the pileus was 5.53 (4.74 - 6.23) in males
and 5.14 (4.38 - 6.90) in females and the CD was 0.44.
Vol.10, p. 205
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
x
0
>s
0
CQ
■o
c
CO
E
3
L_
D
LU
0
c/3
>,
CO
TO
i—
CO
c
<
0'
>,
c
o
N
'c
0
o
cu
>
x
cu
LL
E
o
vt
CO
£
CO
Q.
o
CO
c
o
0
Cl
0
Cl
<U
JC
c:
cu
(U
cu
JQ
0)
1
0)
o
CO
i —
CO
x
o
H—
o
cu
E
o
C/3
CO
3
3
£
co g?
c ^
cu
E
3
4— »
CO
c
co
cu
-C
cu
o «
CU JC
CL
CO c
co iS
c 0
cu E
cu
CD
<U
co
co
3
L_
13
II
CO **=
0- -O
E ®
8 g
JB 1
1— «
. . CO
CM 0)
_0) CL
x E
,co CO
CO
c
CO
a>
E .£ o
>s -^5 >s o
<U Z"
cl a
co
CO CM
CO E
E(— TO
m c <D
1 1 I 3 s
N O S °>
Ul aS _
co Z
co
- 8
E
c
CO
c ^ cu
M- §
CD 00
^ UJ
m O 2 05
5 &< T-
CO
CO C
2 8 .§ - S
™ E 'o)3s
c 'o iS O)
<f cu <
^ CL
CO 2
0
0
E
0
i_
0
CL
CO CO CM t— h''- M"
T_. LO ^ CO I ^ 00
I CD O ,,-T h-' o' 05
CO
CM
CD
CO M"
M- M" M" M" -^T O
h- 1-- h- h» r-» N- CD
O CO CM <•(-. I 00 Tf
CD_ LT) CD 03 O
CD" CO O trC co' 03 00
CO T— CM ^ T- CM M-
CO CD CD CD CD CD CO
M~ M" M" M“ M- M' M“
CD CO CO
COt-N
co' co' 03'
CO X— T —
CO
03
co'
m in in io
m M- oo
co co
co' co' t-~
CO T- CM
M" M- M-
h- r^- r^.
in o d
oo oo o
h-' in' t-'
CO T- CM
in
CM
r-'
in m m- m
m m m in
0
•*->
0
a
o
= ®
0 3
2>E c
.E 0 2
g* 0
D)= o
o -£ 2 .5 -
^ E cn o.~o c -1
o 0 ^ 3 ® 8 OQ
Q IL Tt « 2 > I
ro
L_
a>
+-»
J5
.{2 o
_0 o
3 Z
0
C:0
The tail was longer in males (76.59) than females
(70.62) and the CD of this measurements was 0.28.
Color and Pattern. - Dorsal coloration is more ground,
grayish-brown in the Elmali population and lighter
brown in the other three populations studied. A slim
dark line was present from posterior of occipital scute
towards the posterior. This line does not stretch to the
base of forelimbs in juveniles. There were few dark
spots on the vertebrals of some specimens (11%). Dark
blotches extending dorso ventral ly from vertebal line
formed bands, particularly on Beyobasi specimens. The
supra-temporal line was usually continuous until the
middle part of body; broken lines continued posteriorly
to the base of the tail or sometimes until the tip of tail in
some specimens. Small spots are present, their central
parts are greenish-blue and surrounding areas are dark
starting at the base of the forelimb and usually continu-
ing posteriorly. The subocular line is dirty white in color
and continues to the hindlimbs. Dark spots were present
under this line in some specimens.
Ventral scales are yellow in males, especially dur-
ing the breeding season (which change to white later in
the season), and lighter in females. However, the color
under the hind limb was sometimes yellowish; the other
parts were pinkish-white for females. Dark stains on
ventralia were absent on the samples, except for the last
ventral plate.
Ecological Observations. - The three specimen collec-
tion localities were new localities for L. parva , except
for the Bey§ehir population. These habitats were nearly
2000 m in altitude (i.e., Bozhoyiik-Ovacik 1800 m.,
(fayiryakasi-Gazipa§a 1850 m.,
Beyobasi 1900 m.). The 22 specimens, from
Bozhoyiik-Ovacik population, were caught between
bushes and small vegetation. The weather was a bit
cloudy and the temperature was approximately 24°C.
Laudakia stellio and Ablepharus kitaibelii species were
also observed in the same habitat. The specimens from
Cayiryakasi and Beyobasi were caught while active or
under stones at the temperature around 29°C. The col-
lection habitats of the specimens were covered mainly
small bushy vegetation not big trees. Lacerta danfordi ,
Mabuya vittata, Cyrtopodion kotschyi and Natrix natrix
species were also observed in the same area.
Evaluation and Discussion
There were no statistical differences between the differ-
ent populations in this study, but tail length, pileus
length, fore-limb and hind-limb lengths, and the number
of femoral openings were higher in males than females.
Vol.10, p. 206
The head and body length and the number of lateral
plate lines were higher in females than males. Atagiin
(1984) reported that only one plate is present behind the
postnasal plate in 26% of the specimens from the Erzu-
rum population, but not present in the remaining five
populations in his work. We did not record any such
character from our specimens. Atagiin (1984) also
reported that the division of the occipital plate was also
different in the Erzurum population by having a higher
number of divisions. This population was also studied
by Peters (1962), but he did not mention such differ-
ences. Only a small percent (3%) of our specimens
showed a division in the occipital plate.
Peters (1962), in his study comparing L. parva pop-
ulations between Caucasia and Anatolia, found that the
mean number of dorsalia were different (males = 35.97;
females = 34.76) in Caucasian population than Anato-
lian population (males= 38.52; females= 37.53). Our
values from West Taurus (males= 37.68; females=
36.42) were very similar to Peters (1962) values from
Anatolia. This value, along with other parameters, are
presented in Table 2. As it can be seen from this table,
the results of this work are very close to the results of
the Bey§ehir population reported by Mulayim et al.
(2001).
Peters (1962) also reported the mean number of
lamellae under the fourth finger to be very similar
between the Caucasian (males= 21.6; females= 21.2)
and Anatolian (males= 22.6; females= 22.1) specimens.
Our results for this character were slightly lower than
Peters’ results but very close to the results of Mulayim
et al. (2001) (Table 2). The number of femoral openings
reported by Peters (1962) were slightly higher (males=
17.56; females= 16.46) for Caucasian than for Anatolian
(males= 17; females= 15.91) specimens. The number of
femoral openings in this study were found to be very
close to the most eastern Anatolian population of Erzu-
rum (Table 2). The HBL, the mean numbers of supra-
cilliar plate, lateral plates in ventralia were very similar
with the results of Mulayim et al. (2001), but the mean
number of median gularia in this study was very close to
the Fethiye population reported by Atagiin (1984).
There were no remarkable differences in color and pat-
tern reported by others (Peters, 1962; Atagiin, 1984;
Baran et al., 1992; Miilayim et al., 2001) and our
results.
As it can be seen from our present and other previ-
ous studies, phenotypic variation among the reptile pop-
ulations from Turkey have been quantified extensively
using morphological characters. Comparison of mor-
phometric measurements may yield a new subspecies,
but the different populations of L. parva from Turkey
may vary even genetically. Unfortunately, genetic diver-
sity at the intra-specific level is not available for any
species in Turkey. Sequencing DNA, in particular
mtDNA, may help to solve the taxonomic problems
present in the herpetofauna of Turkey, as it was done for
other amphibian species (i.e. Garcia-Paris et al., 1998)
and for sea turtles (i.e., Bowen et al., 1994; Kaska,
2000).
Acknowledgments
This work is some part of the project [Project No:
TBAG-1475 (196T021)] supported by TUBITAK (The
Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey).
Literature Cited
Atagun, F. 1984. Turkiye’de Lacerta parva (Reptilia,
Lacertidae)’nm Taksonomik Arastirilmasi. (Yuk-
sek Lisans Tezi) Bomova- IZMIR, 1-18.
Baran, I., I.Yilmaz, R. Kete, Y. Kumluta? and S. H.
Durmu§. 1992. Bati ve Orta Karadeniz Bolgesi’nin
Herpetofaunasi. Doga Tropical Journal of Zoology
16(3):275-288.
Baran, i. and M. K. Atatiir. 1998. Turkiye Herpeto faunas
(Kurbaga ve Suriingenler). Qevre Bakanligi-
Ankara: 1-214.
Ba§oglu, M. and I. Baran. 1977. Turkiye Siiriingenleri.
Kisim I. Kaplumbaga ve Kertenkeleler. Ege Univ.
Fen Fak. Kitaplar Serisi, Izmir, No. 76: 1-272.
Bird, C. G. 1936. The Distribution of Reptiles and
Amphibians in Asiatic Turkey, with notes on a Col-
lection from Vilayets of Adana, Gaziantep and
Malatya. The Annual Magazine of Natural History,
London 10(18):257-281.
Bodenheimer, F. S. 1944. Introduction into the Knowl-
edge of the Amphibia and Reptilia of Turkey.
Revue de la Faculte des sciences de l’Universite
d’lstanbul 9 (1): 1-78.
Boulenger, G. A. 1887. Catalogue of The Lizards In The
British Museum (Natural History). Second Edition,
Vol. Ill (Lacertidae, Gerrhosauridae, Scincidae,
Anelytropidae, Dibamidae, Chamaeleontidae),
London, 1-575.
Bowen, B. W., N. Kamezaki, C. L. Limpus, G. H.
Hughes, A. B. Meylan and J. C. Avise. 1994. Glo-
bal phylogeography of the loggerhead turtle
{Caretta caretta ) as indicated by mitochondrial
DNA haplotypes. Evolution 48:1820-1828.
Garcia-Paris, M., M. Alcobendos, and P. Alberch. 1998.
Influence of the Guadalquvir river basin on mito-
Vol. 10, p. 207
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
chondrial DNA evolution of Salamandra salaman-
dra (Caudata: salamandridae) from southern Spain.
Copeia 1998:173-176.
Kaska, Y. 2000. Genetic structure of Mediterranean Sea
Turtle Populations. Turkish Journal of Zoology
24:191-197.
Mayr, E. 1969. Principles of Systematics Zoology. Mac-
Graw Hill Book Co., Inc. New York, 428 pp.
Mertens, R. 1952. Amphibien und Reptilien aus der
Ttirkei. Istanbul Universitesi Fen Fakiiltesi mec-
muasi. ser. B 17:41-75.
Minitab Reference Manual PC Version. 1991. Release
8.2 Qickest Inc., Rosemont, Pennsylvania.
Mtilayim, A., C. V. Tok and D. Ayaz. 2001. Bey§ehir
(Konya) Civarindan Toplanan Lacerta parva Bou-
lenger, 1887 (Sauria: Lacertidae) Omekleri Ozer-
inde Morfolojik Bir £ali§ma. Anadolu University
Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 2, No.
2:345-349.
Nesterow, P. W. 1912. K gerpetologii judo-sapadnowo
sakawkasja I pogranitschnoj tschasti Maloi Asii
(Zur Herpetologi des Siidwestlichen Tran-
skaukasiens und der Agrenzenden Teile von Klein-
asien). Annuaire du Musee Zoologique de
l’Academie des Sciences, St. Petersbourg 17:74-75.
Nikolsky, A. M. 1915. Fauna Rossii i Sopredelnych
stran.I. Presmykajuschtschijesja. Fauna of Russia
and adjacent Countries. Reptiles. Vol. I. Chelonia
and Sauria. 352pp., Petrograd (English Edition by
the Israel Program for Scientific Translations,
Jerusalem 1963).
Peters, G. 1962. Die Zwergeidechse (Lacerta parva
Boulenger) und ihre Verwandtschafts-beziehungen
zu anderen Lacertiden, insbesondere zur Libanon-
Eeidechse (L. fraasii Lehrs). Zoologisches Jahr-
buch 89: 407-478.
Venchi, A. and M. A. Bologna. 1996. Lacerta parva
Boulenger, a new lizard species for the European
fauna. Amphibia-Reptilia 17:89-90.
Werner, F. 1902. Die Reptilien-und Amphibienfauna
von Kleinasien. Sitz. -ber. Adademie der Wissen-
schaften Mathematische - Naturwisssenschaften.
Abt. I, 111:1057-1121.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, pp. 208-214
Genetic Variation Among Agamid Lizards of the Trapelus agilis
Complex in the Caspian-Aral Basin
J. Robert Macey1’2’* and Natalia B. Ananjeva3
1 Department of Evolutionary Genomics, Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley
National Laboratory, 2800 Mitchell Drive, Walnut Creek, CA 94598-1631, USA
2 Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
3 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia
*To whom correspondence should be addressed: E-mail: jrmacey@lbl.gov
Abstract. - Allozyme variation is examined in eight populations of Trapelus from the Caspian-Aral Basin of the for-
mer USSR. Thirty one loci (15 variable) exhibit remarkably low levels of genetic variation with only a Nei's genet-
ic distance of 0.1 17 across 2500 km. An isolated population on the European side of the Caspian Sea is found to phe-
netically cluster inside the Asian populations examined, suggesting that it should not be considered taxonomically dis-
tinct.
Key words. - Reptilia, Squamata, Agamidae, Trapelus , Central Asia, biogeography, allozyme electrophoresis.
Introduction
The Trapelus agilis complex is distributed on the Iranian
Plateau and adjacent regions of southwestern Asia, as
well as in the Caspian-Aral Basin to the north in the inte-
rior of Asia. Two separate populations of the Trapelus
agilis complex are separated by the Caspian Sea in the
Caspian-Aral Basin (including regions draining to Lake
Balkhash) of the former USSR. One population on the
eastern side of the Caspian Sea ranges from western
China, Kazakhstan, and Kirgizistan in the north, to
Turkmenistan (Fig. 1), Uzbekistan, and Tadjikstan in the
south. This Central Asian population is continuous with
Iranian, Afghan, and other southwest Asian populations
referred to Trapelus agilis. On the western side of the
Caspian Sea in Europe a small population occurs in
Chechenia and Dagestan, Russia. The two populations
occurring in the Caspian-Aral Basin are placed either in
a separate species, T. sanguinolentus, or subspecies, T.
agilis sanguinolentus. Taxonomic controversy also
exists as to the status of the isolated European popula-
tion of Trapelus. Some authors consider the European
population to be a distinct subspecies of T. sanguinolen-
tus ( T. s. sanguinolentus ) with the Central Asian popula-
tions being referred to T. s. aralensis (Ananjeva and
Tsaruk, 1987). Others consider the European and Asian
populations in the Caspian-Aral Basin to be a single
taxon, either T. sanguinolentus (Bannikov et al., 1977)
or T. agilis sanguinolentus (Wermuth, 1967). The focus
of this study is on the relative position of the European
and Asian populations in the Caspian-Aral Basin. The
Caspian-Aral Basin populations are always grouped
together either as a species or as one or two distinct sub-
species relative to the southwest Asian populations
referred to as T. agilis.
Trapelus is an old genus of Agamid lizards with an
Afro-Arabian origin (Macey et al., 2000b). Sequence
divergence between Trapelus species in Africa ( Trapelus
savignii ), Arabia (T. persicus ), the Iranian Plateau ( T.
agilis ), and the Caspian-Aral Basin ( Trapelus sanguino-
lentus population 6 of this study), which form a clade, is
10.7-13.9% for the mitochondrial DNA segment span-
ning from nadl to coxl (Macey et al., 2000b). Applying
the rate of 1.3% change per million years for pairwise
comparisons as calculated for this segment of mitochon-
drial DNA in agamid lizards of the genus Laudakia
(Macey et al., 1998), divergence times among these
species of Trapelus are estimated to be 8.3 to 10.7 mil-
lion years before present (MYBP). These data suggest
that the genus has been in Asia since the Miocene.
Allozyme data are used to distinguish hypotheses of
early divergence of the European and Asian trans-
Caspian populations into discrete entities, verses colo-
nization of the European side of the Caspian Sea by
western Asian populations. High mountains in the
Caucasus and Elburz ranges prevent colonization of the
European population from the south, where a continuous
land connection does exist to Trapelus populations in
Iran. The Caspian-Aral Basin corresponds to much of
the Paratethys Sea, which during the Miocene almost
completely dried up 5-6 MYBP and then returned briefly
in the Pliocene, 3.0-3.5 MYBP (Steininger and Rogl,
1984). Divergence following the early period (5-6
MYBP) when much of the Caspian-Aral Basin was
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 209
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Figure 1. A Trapelus from Repetek Desert Reserve Station, Repetek (38° 34' N, 63° 11' E), Chardjou Region,
Turkmenistan. The photo was taken in May, 1989. This is a representative of population 5 of this study.
available for colonization, should halt gene flow in the
late Miocene or Pliocene and two discrete populations
are expected to be detected, one in Europe and one in
Asia. Alternatively, a more recent colonization from a
founder event, when the Caspian Sea level fluctuated in
the Pleistocene, should have a much later restriction in
gene flow and therefore the European population may be
expected to be nested within the Asian population.
Material and Methods
Laboratory Protocols. - Tissues were taken in the field,
immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and later trans-
ferred to an ultracold freezer and maintained at -80° C.
For analysis of allozymic variation, liver and muscle tis-
sues were homogenized separately. Horizontal starch-
gel electrophoresis was employed to differentiate varia-
tion in 3 1 presumptive loci. The 3 1 loci and eight buffer
conditions utilized to resolve them are displayed in table
1. Allozymes were stained using standard methods
(Harris and Hopkinson, 1976; Murphy et al., 1990;
Richardson et al., 1986; Selander et al., 1971).
Carboxylic ester hydrolase (Dimeric Esterase) was
resolved using 4-methylumbelliferyl acetate as the sub-
strate, Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) was resolved
using 7h7ra-2-Hexen-l-ol as the substrate, an unidenti-
fied peptidase (PEP-1) was resolved using L-leucyl-L-
alanine as the substrate, and Peptidase D (PEP-D) and an
unidentified peptidase (PEP-2) with the use of L-pheny-
lalanyl-L-proline as the substrate. The isozymes, and
loci if more than one, were labeled according to their
migration from anode to cathode.
Specimen Information. - Museum numbers and locali-
ties for voucher specimens are presented below.
Acronyms are CAS for California Academy of Sciences,
San Francisco and MVZ for Museum of Vertebrate
Zoology, University of California at Berkeley. Russia:
(population 1) Tersko-Kumskaya nizmennast (the low-
land between Terek and Kuma Rivers), 15 km WNW
(airline) of Voskresenskaya, which is approx. 25 km
NNW of Gudermes (43° 21' N 46° 06' E),
Schelkovskaya District, Chechen-lngush Autonomous
Republic (CAS 182952, 183032-183038). Kazakhstan;
(population 2) Almaty (43° 15' N 76° 57' E), Almaty
Region (MVZ 216014-216016, CAS 183047-183051).
Uzbekistan: (population 3) sand dunes on the west side
of the Surkhan Darya (River), on the Kumkurgan (37°
48' N, 67° 37' E) to Denau (38° 16' N, 67° 54’ E) Rd.,
Surkhan Darjinskaya Region (CAS 183004-183006).
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 210
Table 1. The 31 protein loci scored and the electrophoretic conditions within which they were resolved.
^Tissue abbreviations are: L = liver; M = skeletal muscle.
^Electrophoretic conditions: (1) Lithium-borate/Tris-citrate pH 8.2, 250 v for 6 h (Selander et al., 1971); (2) Amine-cit-
rate (Morpholine) pH 6.0, 250 v for 6 h (Clayton and Tretiak, 1972); (3) Tris-citrate/borate pH 8.7, 250 v for 5 h
(Selander et al., 1971); (4) Histidine-citrate pH 7.8, 150 V for 8 hours (Harris and Hopkinson, 1976); (5) Phosphate-cit-
rate pH 7.0, 120 v for 7 h (Selander et al., 1971); (6) Tris-citrate II pH 8.0, 130 v for 8 h (Selander et al., 1971); (7) Tris-
HCL pH 8.5, 250 v for 4 1/2 h (Selander et al., 1971); (8) Tris-maleate-EDTA pH 7.4, 100 v for 10 h (Selander et al.,
1971).
CEST-D = Dimeric Esterase
Turkmenistan: (population 4) SW bank of the Amur
Darya (River), approx. 2 km NE of Nephtezavodsk
which is 30 km WNW of Deynau (39° 15' N, 63° 1 T E),
Chardjou Region (CAS 179552-179559); (population 5)
1 km north of Repetek Desert Reserve Station, Repetek
(38° 34’ N, 63° 1 1 ' E), Chardjou Region (CAS 1 79 1 99-
179203, 179416-179420), and Repetek Desert Reserve
Station, Repetek (38° 34' N, 63° 11' E), Chardjou
Region (CAS 179331); (population 6) 55 km north of
Ashgabat (37° 57' N, 58° 23' E) on the Ashgabat -
Bakhardok (38° 46' N, 58° 30' E) Rd. then 21 km WNW
on dirt Rd., Ashgabat Region (CAS 179758-179767);
(population 7) Ashgabat (37° 57' N, 58° 23' E),
Ashgabat Region (MVZ 216087-216092); (population
8) near Iolotan’ [YolotanJ (37° 18' N, 62° 21' E), Mary
Region (MVZ 216013).
Data Analysis, - Nei’s (1978) unbiased genetic distance
and Rogers (1972) genetic similarity were calculated
using BIOSYS-I (Swofford and Selander, 1981).
Phenetic clustering was constructed using the neighbor-
joining algorithm (Saitou and Nei, 1987), which does
not require rate uniformity, using PAUP* 4.0 (Swofford,
1999) and Nei’s (1978) unbiased genetic distance.
Results
Variable Loci. - Fifteen of the 31 loci screened show
variation among the sampled populations (Table 2). Up
to five different allelic states are recognized per loci
among populations with no more than four allelic states
being present within a population.
Genetic Distances. - Allozymic variation among sam-
pled populations of Trapelus is surprisingly low (Table
3). The two geographically most distant samples, the
European side of the Caspian-Aral Basin (West Caspian)
and Kazakhstan (Almaty), have a Nei’s (1978) unbiased
genetic distance of only 0.117 across 2500 km. The
highest Nei’s (1978) unbiased genetic distances recov-
Vol. 10, p.211
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
p*®c^romorPh frequencies for the 15 polymorphic loci from eight populations of Trapelus sampled. Localities
are West Caspian (WCA), Almaty (ALM), Uzbekistan (UZB), Nephtezavodsk (NEP), Repetek (REP), 70 km NW
Ashgabat (NWA), Ashgabat (ASH), lolotan' (IOL). See text for complete localities of all populations used.
Table 3. Matrix of genetic distance and identity coefficients from the eight populations of Trapelus sampled. Nei's unbi-
ased genetic distance (Nei, 1978) is above the diagonal, Rogers genetic similarity (Rogers, 1972) is below the diago-
nal and sample sizes are on the diagonal. See text for specimen deposition and complete localities of all populations
used.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 212
Genetic Distances among USSR Populations of Trapelus agilis Complex
Figure 2. Map of the Caspian-Aral Basin and southwest Asia showing the distribution of the Trapelus agilis complex.
Dots depict populations sampled. Lines connect populations in major areas, West Caspian, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan
and Turkmenistan. Nei's unbiased genetic distance (Nei 1978) is plotted between areas. The Turkmen populations are
averaged. The western most sample on the west side of the Caspian Sea is population 1 (table 3). The eastern most
sample is Almaty in Kazakhstan (population 2). To the southwest of this sample is the Uzbekistan population (popula-
tion 3). Four of the Turkmen samples are connected by lines. The most northeastern is population 4 from
Nephtezavodsk and the most southeastern is population 5 from Repetek. The most northwestern is population 6 from
70 km NW Ashgabat and the most southwestern is population 7 from Ashgabat. Population 8 from lolotan' is not includ-
ed in the average of Turkmen populations because of the low sample size of one and it is distributed between dodu-
lations 5 and 7. H H
ered are 0.088-0.145 (note that the highest value is with
a sample size of one) between the northwestern popula-
tion in Kazakhstan (Almaty) and all other populations
sampled in the Caspian-Aral Basin. The European pop-
ulation on the western side of the Caspian Sea is separat-
ed from all other populations except the Kazakhstan
(Almaty) population by Nei’s (1978) unbiased genetic
distances of 0.026-0.066. The population in Uzbekistan
is distinct from those in Turkmenistan by Nei’s (1978)
unbiased genetic distances of 0.019-0.048.
Mapping these genetic distances on geography
reveals a pattern of isolation by distance in which all dis-
tances appear relatively additive (Fig. 2). Clustering of
these data in a neighbor-joining phenogram and rooting
the tree on the longest path places the Kazakhstan
(Almaty) population and Uzbekistan sample in a basal
Vol. 10, p. 213
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
West Caspian (1)
*— 70 km NW Ashgabat (6)
•“ Ashgabat (7)
lolotan’ (8)
Nephtezavodsk (4)
— Repetek (5)
Uzbekistan (3)
Airaa-Aty (2)
0.01 changes
Figure 3. Neighbor-joining phenogram rooted on the
longest path. Note that the European population on the
western side of the Caspian Sea is nested inside the
Asian populations sampled and appears as the sister
population to its nearest Asian population (70 km NW
Ashgabat). Population numbers corresponding to figure
1, and tables 2 and 3 are given adjacent to locality
names.
position. The European (West Caspian) population
appears nested within the Turkmen populations and as
the sister population to its nearest Asian population (70
km NW Ashgabat), (Fig. 3). This pattern is consistent
with the observed genetic distances.
Discussion
The Age of Trapelus in the Caspian-Aral Basin. - The
European population of Trapelus is found to cluster phe-
netically within the Asian populations with little genetic
differentiation, suggesting that these taxa do not repre-
sent distinct forms. The low genetic diversity in
Trapelus of the Caspian-Aral Basin probably indicates a
recent dispersion of Trapelus throughout the Caspian-
Aral Basin. Nei’s (1978) unbiased genetic distances do
not exceed 0.117 (with the exception of Kazakhstan to
lolotan’ Turkmenistan with a sample size of one). A very
approximate estimate of divergence time and genetic
distance is 14 million years for a Nei’s D of 1.0 (Maxson
and Maxson, 1979). Given this rate these data suggest a
divergence of Trapelus populations in the Caspian-Aral
Basin at around 1.6 MYBP. This result suggests that
Trapelus did not diverge in the Caspian-Aral Basin until
the Pleistocene, well after the last drying of the
Paratethys Sea 3.5 MYBP (Steininger and Rogl, 1984).
Comparison to Other Taxa. - One additional genus of
lizard has been sampled from the Caspian-Aral Basin for
allozyme variation. The northern populations of the
gekkonid genus Mediodactylus from Almaty and the
Junggar Depression of China show a minimum of two
fixed differences when compared to a southern popula-
tion in the Kara Kum Desert (Macey et ah, 2000a). This
divergence is greater than those observed among
Trapelus where no fixed differences are detected
between Almaty (population 2) and the Kara Kum
Desert (populations 4-8). Because the Caspian-Aral
Basin has had periods of inundation followed by drying
over the last 6 million years, and the surrounding moun-
tains of the Pamir-Tien Shan are older providing a land
refuge (10 million years old; Abdrakhmatov et al.,
1996), taxa in the Caspian-Aral Basin may show differ-
ent levels of divergence.
Taxonomic Recommendations. - Because Trapelus
sanguinolentus in the Caspian-Aral Basin is distin-
guished from Trapelus agilis of the Iranian Plateau by
10.9% sequence divergence for the mitochondrial DNA
segment spanning from nadl to coxl (Macey et al.,
2000b), we consider them separate species. No more
than a single fixed difference is observed between pop-
ulations of Trapelus in the Caspian-Aral Basin.
Therefore, we interpret these populations to be a single
taxon, T. sanguinolentus. Further work comparing pop-
ulations in Southwest Asia is needed in order to deter-
mine the specific status of these populations.
Acknowledgments
This work is LBNL-54654 and was performed under the
auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of
Biological and Environmental Research, under contract
No. DE-AC03-76SF00098 with the University of
California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
This work was also supported by grants from the
National Geographic Society (4110-89 and 4872-93 to
Theodore J. Papenfuss and J.R.M.), Russian Foundation
of Basic Research (N 02-04-48720 to N.B.A.), Scientist
School (NS 1647.2003.4 to N.B.A.), the California
Academy of Sciences and the Museum of Vertebrate
Zoology. We thank Tatjana N. Duysebayeva for tissue
specimens. Nikolai Orlov, Theodore J. Papenfuss,
Sakhat M. Shammakov, and Boris S. Tuniyev aided with
field work. Kraig Adler and Allan Larson provided valu-
able comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript. The
first author thanks David B. Wake and Margaret F. Smith
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 214
for the opportunity to collect allozymic data at the
Museum of Vertebrate Zoology.
Literature Cited
Abdrakhmatov, K. Ye., S. A. Aldazhanov, B. H. Hager,
M. W. Hamburger, T. A. Herring, K. B. Kalabaev, V.
I. Makarov, P. Molnar, S. V. Panasyuk, M. T.
Prilepin, R. E. Reilinger, I. S. Sadybakasov, B. J.
Souter, Yu. A. Trapeznikov, V. Ye. Tsurkov, and A.
V. Zubovich. 1996. Relatively recent construction
of the Tien Shan inferred from GPS measurements
of present-day crustal deformation rates. Nature
384:450-453.
Ananjeva and Tsaruk. 1987. The taxonomic status of the
steppe agama, Trapelus sanguinolentus in the
Precaucasus. In Herpetological Investigations in the
Caucasus. Proc. Zool. Institute, Leningrad 158:39-
46. (In Russian).
Bannikov, A. G., I. S. Darevsky, V. G. Ishchenko, A. K.
Rustamov, and N. N. Shcherbak. 1977. [Guide to
amphibians and reptiles of the USSR fauna].
Prosveshchenie, Moskva. 415 pp. (In Russian).
Clayton, J. W., and D. N. Tretiak. 1972. Amine-citrate
buffers for pH control in starch gel electrophoresis.
Journal of Fish. Res. Board Canada 29:1169-1172.
Harris, H., and D. A. Hopkinson. 1976 et seq. Handbook
of Enzyme Electrophoresis in Human Genetics,
Oxford, North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam,
(loose leaf with supplements in 1977 and 1978).
Macey, J. R., Schulte II, J. A., Ananjeva, N. B., Larson,
A., Rastegar-Pouyani, N., Shammakov, S. M., and
Papenfuss, T. J. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships
among agamid lizards of the Laudakia caucasia
species group: Testing hypotheses of biogeograph-
ic fragmentation and an area cladogram for the
Iranian Plateau. Molecular Phylogenetics and
Evolution 10:118-131.
Macey, J. R., N. B. Ananjeva, Y. Wang, and T. J.
Papenfuss. 2000a. Phylogenetic relationships
among Asian gekkonid lizards formerly of the
genus Cyrtodactylus based on cladistic analyses of
allozymic data: Monophyly of Cyrtopodion and
Mediodactylus. Journal of Herpetology 34:258-265.
Macey, J. R., J. A. Schulte II, A. Larson, N. B. Ananjeva,
Y. Wang, R. Pethiyagoda, N. Rastegar-Pouyani, and
T. J. Papenfuss. 2000b. Evaluating trans-Tethys
migration: An example using acrodont lizard phy-
logenetics. Systematic Biology 49:233-256.
Maxson, L. R., and R. Maxson. 1979. Comparative
albumin and biochemical evolution in plethodontid
salamanders. Evolution 33:1057-1062.
Murphy, R. W. , J. W. Sites, Jr., D. G. Buth, and C. H.
Haufler. 1990. Proteins I: Isozyme electrophoresis.
In D. M. Hillis and C. Moritz (eds.), Molecular
Systematics, pp. 45-126. Sinauer Associates,
Sunderland, Mass.
Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and
genetic distance from a small number of individu-
als. Genetics 89:583-590.
Richardson, B. J., P. R. Baverstock, and M. Adams.
1986. Allozyme Electrophoresis. A Handbook for
Animal Systematics and Population Studies.
Academic Press, Sydney.
Rogers, J. S. 1972. Measures of genetic similarity and
genetic distance. Stud. Genet. VII, Univ. Texas
Publ. 7213:145-153.
Saitou, N., and M. Nei. 1987. The neighbor-joining
method: A new method for reconstructing phyloge-
netic tree. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4:406-
425.
Selander, R. K., M. H. Smith, S. Y. Yang, W. E. Johnson,
and J. R. Gentry. 1971. Biochemical polymorphism
and systematics in the genus Peromyscus. I.
Variation in the old-field mouse ( Peromyscus
polionotus ). Studies in Genetics VI. Univeristy of
Texas Publications 7103:49-90.
Steininger, F. F., and F. Rogl. 1984. Paleogeography and
palinspastic reconstruction of the Neogene of the
Mediterranean and Paratethys. In J. E. Dixon and A.
H. F. Robertson (eds.), The Geological Evolution
of the Eastern Mediterranean, pp. 659-668.
Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
Swofford, D. L. 1999. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis
Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), 4.0,
Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.
Swofford, D. L., and R. K. Selander. 1981. BIOSYS-1:
A FORTRAN program for the comprehensive
analysis of electrophoretic data in population genet-
ics and systematics. Journal of Heredity 72-282-
283.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol.10, pp. 215-216
The Feeding Biology of Rana macrocnemis Boulenger, 1885
(Anura: Ranidae), Collected in llludag, Bursa, Turkey
iSMAlL H. UGurta^, Hikmet S. Yildirimhan, and Mehmet Kalkan
Uludag University’ Science-Art Faculty ; Department of Biology’ Bursa-Turkey
Abstract. - In this study gut contents of 64 mature specimens (34 male, 30 female) from Rana macrocnemis popula-
tion collected from Uludag(Bursa) are analyzed. The results indicate that the majority (68.05%) of the food items is
composed of insects.
Key words. - Rana macrocnemis , feeding, stomach content.
Introduction
Rana macrocnemis is a very common species in the
northern and eastern Caucasus and has dispersed into
Western and Northern Anatolia in Turkey. Also known
as a “mountain frog”, its altitudinal distribution ranges
from 1,000 to 2,300 m. It generally lives in open areas
or in small brooks in or near the woods. It is also seen in
areas w ith muddy bottoms or close to water. Many stud-
ies have been conducted to find out the feeding biology
of amphibia (Bohme 1975; Boulenger, 1897; Schreiber,
1912; Beschkov, 1970; Lamb, 1984; Yilmaz, 1984;
Sampetro, 1986; Gittins, 1987; AtatUr, 1993; Ugurtas
1995), but no detailed study exists on the feeding biol-
ogy of Rana macrocnemis. The aim of this study is to
establish various animal groups that are taken as prey by
this species.
Materials and Methods
The specimens of Rana macrocnemis used in this study
were collected in three localities between June and July
1997 (Fig. 1). These localities are:
Kirazlyayla (1 6 males, 30 females)
Hotels Area (10 males)
(^obankaya (8 females)
The specimens were found between the hours 730
and 1930 hours in daylight, but were observed to appear
more often between 1030 and 1500 hours. We used
Parker (1982), Lodos (1983, 1986), and Caglar and
Demirsoy (1992, 1999) to identify prey items.
Results
We did not observe any significant discrepancies in the
stomach contents of males and females. Thus, they were
evaluated together. Of the 64 specimens collected dur-
Figure 1 . Localities where Rana macrocnemis speci-
mens were collected.
ing the feeding period, two had empty stomachs.
Among stomach contents which were investigated, 626
prey items were counted. Of these prey items, 426
(68.05%) belonged to Insecta, 36 (5.75%) to Arach-
nida, 44 (7.02%) to Gastropoda, 4 (0.63%) to Myri-
apoda, 112 (17.89%) to lsopoda and 2 (0.31%) to
Acarina groups. Two (0.31%) juveniles of Rana mac-
rocnemis were also found as stomach content.
The number of prey items found in stomachs and
their taxonomy are listed below. It was found that the
majority of food taken by Rana macrocnemis was com-
posed of insects (68.05%). 144 (36.15%) were
Coleoptera, 82 (19.24%) Plecoptera, 94 (22.06%)
Diptera, 40 (9.38%) Hymenoptera. 36 (8.45%) Odonata,
6 ( 1 .40%) Orthoptera, 6 ( 1 .40%) Lepidoptera, 4 (0.93%)
Homoptera and four (0.93%) in Hemiptera (Fig. 2). As a
result of this study on the stomach contents, we con-
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
□ Cole op be ra (36 15 %)
■ Plecoptera (1 9 24 %)
□ Diptera (22 06 %)
□ Hymenoptera (9 38 %)
■ Odonata (8 4 5 %)
□ Orthcptera (1 40 %)
□ Lep ideptera (140%)
■ Homoptera (0 93 %)
M Hemiptera (0 93 %)
Figure 2. The precentages of insect groups taken as
prey.
elude that Rana macrocnemis is an opportunity feeder
that utilizes any prey in its environment that it has the
ability to consume.
Acknowledgments
Demirsoy, A. 1999. Ya amin 7'emel Kurallar, Omurgas-
zlar -Bocekler Di§inda, Cilt II, Kisim I, Meteksan
A. Ankara, S, 724-939.
Gittins, S. P. 1987. The Diet of the Common Toad ( Bufo
bufo) Around A Pong in Mid-Wales. Amphibia-
Reptilia 8: 13-17.
Lamp, T. 1984. The Influence of Sex and Breeding Con-
dition on Microhabitat Selection and Diet in the Pig
Frog Rana gryllio. 1 he American Midland Natural-
ist 1 1 1(2):31 1-318.
Lodos, N. 1983. Tiirkiye Entomolojisi (Genel Uygula-
mal ve Faunistik), Cilt I Ege Universitesi Matbaas
Ziraat Fak. Yayinlari 282:134-336
Lodos, N. 1986. Tiirkiye Entomolojisi (Genel Uygula-
mal ve Faunistik), Cilt II Ege Universitesi Matbaas
Ziraat Fak. Yaynlar 429:57-498
This work was supported by grants from Uludag Uni-
versity Scientific Research Fund (2001/60)
Literature Cited
Atatiir, M. K. 1993. A Preliminary Study on the Feeding
Biology of Rana ridibunda (Anura, Ranidae) popu-
lation from Bey^ehir Lake. Turkish Journal of Zool-
ogy 17(2): 127- 131.
Beschkov, V. 1970. Biologie und Verbreitung des
Griechischen Froschers {Rana graeca BLGR.) (In
Bulgarian) Academie Bulgare des Sciences. Bulle-
tin de L'institut de Zoologie et Musee. Tome 31:5-
17.
Boulenger, G. A. 1897. The Tailless Batrachians of
Europe. Part. I. Addlard and Son. Hanover Square,
London
Bohme, W. 1975. Zum Vorkommen von Pelobates syri-
aens Boettger, 1889 Griechland. Senck. Biol.
56:199-202.
£aglar, M. 1974. Omurgasiz Hayvanlar, Anatomi-
Sistematik. II. Kisim. U. Yayinilar, Fen Fak, Sayi
123, Fen Fakultesi Basimevi, Istanbul, S, 157-206.
Demirsoy, A. 1992. Yaamn Temel Kurallari,
Omurgasizlar - Entomoloji. Cilt II, Kisim II,
Meteksan A. Ankara, S, 338-814.
Parker, P. S. 1982. Editor Synopsis and Classifications
of Living Organism. Vol. 1 and 2. McGraw-Hill
Book Company.
Sampedro, M. A., and L. Montanez. 1986. Food of
Rana catesbeiana in Two Different Areas of Cuba.
P. 413-416. In Z. Rocek (ed.). Studies in Herpetol-
ogy. Charles University, Prague.
Schreiber E. 1913. Herpetologia Europea. Gustav Fis-
cher, Jena.
Ugurta§, . H., and M. Oz . 1995. Bursa ve Sakarya li
Pelobates syriacus (Anura, Pelobatidae)
Populasyonlarmin Beslenme Biyolojisi Uzerine Bir
On Cali§ma. Turkish Journal of Zoology 19:273-
275.
Yilmazj. 1984. Trakya Kuyruksuz Kurbagalari Uzerine
Morfolojik ve Taksonomik Bir Ara§tirma. Do§a Biy
oloji, S. A2, 8(2): 244-264.
[2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, pp. 217-223
Morphological Observations on the Erythrocyte and Erythrocyte
Size of Some Gecko Species, Turkey
Murat Sevinc*, Ismail Hakki UGurta§, Hikmet Sami Yildirimhan
Uludag University, Science and Art Faculty, Department of Biology, Bursa, Turkey
* To whom correspondence should be addressed; E-mail: smurat@uludag.edu.tr
Abstract. - In this study, erythrocyte size and morphology of the four gecko species [Asaccus elisae, Hemidactylus
turcicus, Cyrtopodion scaber and C. heterocercus mardinensis (Gekkonidae)] from Turkey were examined. Forty-two
specimens were used in this study, of which twelve were A. elisae, eight were H. turcicus , twelve were C. scaber, and
ten were C. h. mardinensis. Erythrocyte morphology of these examined species was described using Wright’s tech-
nique. The sizes of erythrocytes and their nuclei were measured using an ocular micrometer at a magnification of
1600x. The results of this study were compared with previous works on the other reptile species. The longest erythro-
cytes were found in H. turcicus and the shortest in A. elisae. In terms of the studied species, the nucleus and erythro-
cyte sizes were found to be correlated (Gekkonidae: r = 0.39; P < 0.001).
Key words. - Gekkota, Turkey, erythrocyte.
Introduction
Initial studies on the blood of reptiles described the
structures, often comparing them with those of the other
vertebrates. Literature on the haematology of reptilian
blood are based on a few studies where most were con-
cerned with especially European species (Saint Girons,
1970).
Various authors have focused on the different circu-
lating blood cell types of different reptiles (Taylor and
Kaplan, 1961; Heady and Rogers, 1963; Hartman and
Lessler, 1964; Szarski and Czopek, 1966; Duguy, 1970;
Saint Girons, 1970; Mateo et al., 1984; Canfield and
Shea, 1988; Cannon et al., 1996; Alleman et al., 1999;
Sevin? et al., 2000; Atatiir et al., 2001; Sevinc and Ugu-
rta§, 2001; Ugurta§ et al., 2003). Some authors have
studied seasonal (Hutton, 1960; Cline and Waldman,
1962; Haggag et al., 1966) or sexual (Altland and
Thompson, 1958) variations in the number of blood
cells of different reptile species. In addition, researchers
have studied the number of blood cells of different rep-
tiles (Baker and Kline, 1932; Charipper and Davis,
1932; Altland and Thompson, 1958; Hutton, 1961;
Hutchinson and Szarski, 1965; Engbretson and
Hutchinson, 1976; Mateo et al., 1984). Furthermore,
authors have also studied haemoglobin and hematocrit
content of blood and hematopoiesis of different reptiles
(Altland and Thompson, 1958; Hutton, 1961; Goin and
Jackson, 1965; Engbretson and Hutchinson, 1976;
Newlin and Ballinger, 1976; Mateo etal., 1984; Alleman
et al., 1999).
In Turkey, hematological studies have generally
been conducted on humans and some economically
important animals. However, there are few hematologi-
cal studies of the reptiles living in this country (Sevin?
et al., 2000; Atatiir et al., 2001; Sevin? and Ugurta§,
2001; Ugurta§et al., 2003).
In the current study, our aim was to describe and
measure erythrocytes of Asaccus elisae (Werner, 1895),
Hemidactylus turcicus (Linnaeus, 1758), Cyrtopodion
scaber (Heyden, 1827) and C. heterocercus mardinensis
(Mertens, 1924) which live in Turkey. This study is the
first of its kind on Turkish species.
Materials and Methods
In this study, twelve (6 males, 6 females) individuals of
Asaccus elisae, eight (4 males, 4 females) of
Hemidactylus turcicus, twelve (8 males, 4 females) of
Cyrtopodion scaber and ten (4 males, 6 females) of C.
heterocercus mardinensis (Gekkonidae) were examined.
Twenty-two specimens examined were male and twenty
were female.
The study was performed on 01-05 June 2000. H.
turcicus species were collected from Hatay (36° 34' N,
36° 09' E) and the other specimens were from §anliurfa
(36° 53' N, 39° 02' E) (Fig. 1; Table 1). Blood was
obtained by cutting the tail (Duguy, 1974). Immediately
after blood was obtained in heparinized capillary tubes,
blood smears were prepared. Three or five blood smears
were prepared per individual. The smears were air-dried
and stained with Wright’s stain (Hartman and Lessler,
1964). Twelve drops of Wright’s stain were dropped on
the slides and allowed to remain on the slide one and
half minutes before rinsing with phosphate buffer (pH
6.5). The slides were allowed to stand for ten minutes at
room temperature, were washed with distilled water,
and allowed to dry.
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 218
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
On each slide, fifty mature erythrocytes and their
nuclei were measured by means of an ocular micrometer
at a magnification of 1600x. In this way fifty erythrocyte
sizes were calculated. Erythrocyte and nucleus measure-
ments of examined species are given in tables 2-5.
Erythrocyte and nucleus sizes were, respectively, calcu-
lated according to the formulas [(EL x EW x pi) / 4] and
[(NL x NW x pi) / 4]; where EL is the erythrocyte length,
EW is the erythrocyte width, NL is the nucleus length
and NW is the nucleus width.
Results
Erythrocytes, or red blood cells, of geckos are nucleat-
ed, oval cells. Their nuclei are also oval and centrally
located, like those of the other reptiles. The cytoplasm of
mature erythrocytes appeared both light, dark pink, and
homogeneous under Wright’s stain. Nuclei of mature
erythrocytes are chromophilic (Figs. 2-5).
Because there were no significant differences
between the erythrocyte sizes of female and male geck-
os, data from the females and males of individual
species were combined.
The longest erythrocytes were found in Hemi-
dactylus turcicus. The mean length of mature erythro-
cyte of H. turcicus was 16.98 mm (± 1.26 standard devi-
ations, with a range of 14.64-19.52 mm) (Table 2; Fig.
6) and also erythrocyte size and length/width ratios of H.
turcicus are given in table 2.
The shortest erythrocytes were found in Asaccus
elisae. The mean length of mature erythrocytes of A.
elisae was 14.96 mm (± 0.79 standard deviations, with a
range of 13.42-17.08 mm) (Table 3; Fig. 6). Erythrocyte
size and length/width ratios of A. elisae are given in
table 3.
The widest erythrocytes were found in Cyrtopodion
scaber. The mean width of mature erythrocytes of C.
scaber was 10.26 mm (± 0.78 standard deviations, with
a range of 8.54-12.20 mm) (Table 4; Fig. 7). Erythrocyte
size and length/width ratios of C. scaber are given in
table 4.
The narrowest erythrocytes were found in
Cyrtopodion heterocercus mardinensis. The mean width
of mature erythrocyte of C. h. mardinensis was 9. 1 8 mm
(± 0.70 standard deviations, with a range of 6.71-10.98
mm) (Table 5; Fig. 7) and also erythrocyte size and
length/width ratios of C. h. mardinensis are given in
table 5.
The longest nuclei were found in Cyrtopodion
scaber. The mean length of mature nuclei of C. scaber
Table 1. Materials list. NM: number of males; NF: number of females; CD: collection date; CL: collection locality. All
specimens are from the Zoology Museum in Uludag UniversityScience and Art Faculty, Department of Biology.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 219
Figure 2. Erythrocyte and nucleus sizes of Hemidactylus
turcicus.
Figure 4. Erythrocyte and nucleus sizes of Cyrtopodion
scaber.
was 6.81 mm (± 0.60 standard deviations, with a range
of 5.49-8.54 mm) (Table 4; Fig. 6). Nucleus size and
length/width ratios of C. scaber are given in table 4.
The shortest nuclei were found in Asaccus elisae.
The mean length of mature nuclei of A. elisae was 6.06
mm (± 0.58 standard deviations, with a range of 4.88-
7.32 mm) (Table 3; Fig. 6). Nucleus size and
length/width ratios of A. elisae are given in table 3.
The widest nuclei were found in Cyrtopodion hete-
rocercus mardinensis. The mean width of mature nuclei
of C. h. mardinensis was 3.78 mm (± 0.44 standard devi-
ations, with a range of 3.05-4.88 mm) (Table 5; Fig. 7).
Nucleus size and length/width ratios of C. h. mardinen-
sis are given in table 5.
The narrowest nuclei were found in Hemidactylus
turcicus. The mean width of mature nuclei of H. turcicus
was 3.53 mm (± 0.42 standard deviations, with a range
of 3.05-4.27 mm) (Table 2; Fig. 7). Nucleus size and
length/width ratios of H. turcicus are given in table 2.
Discussion
Investigations carried out by various authors (Hartman
Figure 3. Erythrocyte and nucleus sizes of Asaccus
elisae.
Figure 5. Erythrocyte and nucleus of Cyrtopodion hetero-
cercus mardinensis.
and Lessler, 1964; Szarski and Czopek, 1966; Saint
Girons, 1970; Seving et al., 2000; Seving and Ugurta§,
2001; Atatiir et al, 2001; Ugurta§et al, 2003) reported
that the sizes of erythrocytes vary in members of the
four orders of reptiles.
Within the class Reptilia, the largest erythrocytes
are seen in Sphenodon punctatus , turtles, and crocodil-
ians (Hartman and Lessler, 1964; Saint Girons, 1970;
Alleman et al., 1984).
Cryptodiran turtles have the largest erythrocytes
from all previously studied reptiles (Saint Girons, 1970).
The shortest erythrocytes are found in the Lacertidae
family (Hartman and Lessler, 1964; Saint Girons, 1970;
Seving et al., 2000; Seving and Ugurta§, 2001).
Saint Girons (1970) reported erythrocytes and
nuclei measurements of some gecko species. In
Coleonyx variegatus, erythrocyte length is 18.9 pm and
width is 9.6 pm; nucleus length is 7.3 pm and width is
3.7 pm. In Gehyra variegata, erythrocyte length is 17.2
pm and width is 1 1.5 pm; nucleus length is 6.3 pm and
width is 3.8 pm. In Heteronota binoei, erythrocyte
length is 21.4 pm and width is 10.7 pm; nucleus length
is 8.1 pm and width is 3.4 pm.
Vol. 10, p. 220
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Table 2. Erythrocyte dimensions of Hemidactylus turcicus with standard deviations. EL: erythrocyte length, EW. ery
throcyte width; ES: erythrocyte size; NL: nucleus length; NW: nucleus width; NS: nucleus size.
Table 3. Erythrocyte dimensions of Asaccus elisae with standard deviations. EL: erythrocyte length; EW: erythrocyte
width; ES: erythrocyte size; NL: nucleus length; NW: nucleus width; NS: nucleus size.
Table 4. Erythrocyte dimensions of Cyrtopodion scaber with standard deviations. EL: erythrocyte length; EW: ery-
throcyte width; ES: erythrocyte size; NL: nucleus length; NW: nucleus width; NS: nucleus size.
Table 5. Erythrocyte dimensions of Cyrtopodion heterocercus mardinensis with standard deviations. EL: erythrocyte
length; EW: erythrocyte width; ES: erythrocyte size; NL: nucleus length; NW: nucleus width; NS: nucleus size.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 221
12
Asaccus elisae Hemidactylus Cyrtopodion C. heterocercus
turcicus scaber mardinensis
Dl Erythrocyte
@ Nucleus
Examined species
Figure 6. Erythrocyte and nucleus lengths of examined specimens.
Cannon et al. (1996) reported the leukocyte mor-
phology and size of the roughtail gecko Cyrtopodion
scabrnm. However, they did not report any information
on the erythrocyte of this species.
In reptiles, the numbers of erythrocytes are smaller
than in mammals or birds. Lizards have more erythro-
cytes than snakes, and turtles have the fewest. Since
lizards have the smallest erythrocytes of all reptiles, and
turtles the largest, there may be an inverse correlation
between the number of erythrocytes and their size; this
hypothesis was advanced by Ryerson (1949) (Duguy,
1970).
In this study, the longest erythrocytes were found in
H. turcicus, the shortest in A. elisae, the largest in C.
scaber and the narrowest in C. heterocercus mardinen-
sis. The longest nuclei were found in C. scaber, the
shortest A. elisae , the largest in C. heterocercus mardi-
nensis and the narrowest in H. turcicus (Tables 2-5; Figs.
6,7).
In the present study, erythrocyte morphology and
the results of erythrocytes and nuclei sizes (Tables 2-5;
Figs. 6,7) are agreement with the other results carried
out by (Saint Girons, 1970).
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank to MSc. student
Abdulmiittalip Akkaya for helping during studies.
Literature Cited
Alleman, A. R., E. R. Jacopson, and E. R. Raskin. 1992.
Morphologic, cytochemical staining and ultrastruc-
tural characteristics of blood cells from eastern dia-
mondback rattlesnake ( Crotalus adamanteus ).
American Journal of Veterinary Research 60:507-
514.
Asaccus elisae Hemidactylus Cyrtopodion C. heterocercus
turcicus scaber mardinensis
■ Erythrocyte
S Nucleus
Examined species
Figure 7. Erythrocyte end nucleus widths of examined species.
Vol. 10, p. 222
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Altland, P. D. and E. C. Thompson. 1958. Some factors
affecting blood formation in turtles. Proceedings of
the Society of Experimental Biology and Medicine
99:456-459.
Atatiir, M. K., H. Arkan, E. Qevik, and A. Mermer. 2001 .
Erythrocyte measurements of some scincids from
Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology 25:149-152.
Baker, E. G. S. and L. E. Kline. 1932. Comparative ery-
throcyte count of representative vertebrates.
Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Science
41:417-418.
Canfield, P. J. and G. M. Shea. 1988. Morphological
observations on the erythrocytes, leukocytes and
thrombocytes of blue tongue lizards (Lacertilia:
Scincidae, Tiliqua ). Anatomia, Histologia,
Embryologia 17:328-342.
Cannon, M. S., D. A. Freed, and P. S. Freed. 1996. The
leukocytes of the roughtail gecko Cyrtopodion
scabrum : a bright-field and phase-contrast study.
Anat. Histol. Embryol. 25:11-14.
Charipper, H. A., and D. Davis. 1932. Studies on the
arneth count. A study of the blood cells of
Pseudemys elegans with special reference to the
polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Quarterly Journal
of Experimental Physiology 21:371-382.
Cline, M. J. and T. A. Waldmann. 1962. Effect of tem-
perature on red cells in the alligator. Proceedings fo
the Society of Experimental Biology and Medicine
111:716-718.
Duguy, R. 1970. Numbers of blood cells and their vari-
ation. Pp. 93-104 In Gans (ed.), Biology of the
Reptilia, Vol. 3, Morphology C. Academic Press,
New York
Engbretson, G. A. and V. H. Hutchinson. 1976.
Erythrocyte count, hematocrit and haemoglobin
content in the lizard Liolaemus multiformis. Copeia
1:186.
Goin, C. J. and C. G. Jackson. 1965. Hemoglobin val-
ues of some amphibians and reptiles from Florida.
Herpetologica 21:145-146.
Haggag, G., K. A. Raheem, and F. Khalil. 1966.
Hibernation in reptiles II changes in blood glucose,
haemoglobin, red blood cells count, protein and
nonprotein nitrogen. Comparative Biochemistry
and Physiology 17:335-339.
Hartman, F. A. and M. A. Lessler. 1964. Erythrocyte
measurements in fishes, amphibians and reptiles.
Biological Bulletin 126:83-88.
Heady, J. M. and T. E. Rogers. 1963. Turtle blood cell
morphology. Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of
Sciences 69:587-590.
Hutchinson, V. H. and H. Szarski. 1965. Number of ery-
throcytes in some amphibians and reptiles. Copeia
3:373-375.
Hutton, K. E. 1960. Seasonal physiological changes in
the red-eared turtle Pseudemys script a elegans.
Copeia 4:360-362.
Hutton, K. E. 1961. Blood volume, corpuscular con-
stants and shell weight in turtles. American Journal
of Physiology 200:1004-1006.
Mateo, M. R., E. D. Roberts, and F. M. Enright. 1984.
Morphologic, cytochemical and functional studies
of peripheral blood cells from young healthy
American alligators {Alligator mississippiensis).
American Journal of Veterinary Research 45:1046^
1053.
Newlin, M. E. and R. E. Ballinger. 1976. Blood haemo-
globin concentration in four species of lizards.
Copeia 2:392-394.
Saint Girons, M. C. 1970. Morphology of the circulating
blood cells. Pp. 73-91 In Gans (ed.), Biology of the
Reptilia, Vol. 3, Morphology C. Academic Press,
New York
Sevin9, M. and i. H. Ugurta§. 2001. The morphology and
size of blood cells of Lacerta rudis bithynica
(Squamata, Reptilia) Turkey. Asiatic Herpetological
Research 9:122-129.
Sevin?, M., i. H. Ugurta§, and H. S. Yidirimhan. 2000.
Erythrocyte measurements in Lacerta rudis
(Reptilia, Lacertidae). Turkish Journal of Zoology
24:207-209.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 223
Szarski, H. and G. Czopek. 1966. Erythrocyte diameter
in some amphibians and reptiles. Bulletin de
PAcademie Polonaise des Science. Classe 2. Serie
des Sciences Biologiques 14(6):437-443.
Taylor, K. and H. M. Kaplan. 1961. Light microscopy of
the blood cells of pseudemyd turtles. Herpetologica
17:186-196.
Ugurta§, I. H, M. Sevin9, and H. S. Yildirimhan. 2003.
Erythrocyte size and morphology of some tortoises
and turtles from Turkey. Zoological Studies
42(1): 173-178.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, pp. 224-229
Distribution and Conservation Status of Neurergus microspilotus
(Caudata: Salamandridae) in Western Iran
Mozafar Sharifi* and Somayeh Assadian
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
E-mail: sharifimozafar@hotmail. com
Abstract. - Field and laboratory observations of the Yellow Spotted Newt, Neurergus microspilotus (Nestrov, 1917),
in western Iran have yielded preliminary data on conservation biology and distribution of this species. New distribu-
tional ranges have been determined for Neurergus microspilotus in its Iranian range in the mid-Zagros Mountains. In
streams occupied by Neurergus microspilotus, dissolved oxygen, temperature, discharge, N03, and P04 were meas-
ured. Land use practices, adjacent riparian habitats and channel substrate were also determined. Four new stream
habitats were identified. On the basis of interviews with local inhabitants, three other streams were identified as like-
ly habitat for Neurergus microspilotus. Measurements of relative abundance of N. microsphilotus indicate that this
animal is likely to occur in higher numbers in cold and first order streams located at high altitudes in the western edge
of the Iranian plateau on the mid-Zagros Range. The limiting factor for the yellow spotted newts in western Iran
appears to be human disturbance. In the last four years, one of the five known streams with N. microspilotus, in the
area of Ghorighala, has virtually lost its entire population due to pollution by a tourist facility and local sewage efflu-
ence.
Key words. - Neurergus microspilotus , salamander, first order stream, distribution, conservation.
Introduction
Available information on the conservation biology of the
western Iranian salamanders is scarce. Investigations
made in the 1970s (Schmidtler and Schmidtler, 1975)
indicated that three of four species of salamanders
belonging to the genus Neurergus {N. crocatus, N.
microspilotus and N. kaiseri ) occur in Iran. There is no
recent information on distribution and abundance of
these species for assessment of conservation. However,
a world-wide concern over declines in amphibian popu-
lations (Wake, 1991; Gardner, 2001) is equally pertinent
in remote areas of western Iran. Amphibians are sensi-
tive to land-use alteration (Wilkins and Peterson, 2000)
and there is widespread concern that environmental pol-
lution and land deterioration are responsible for their
decline (Richardson, et al 2000). Several factors are
known to have contributed to the declines, including
habitat destruction (Sala et al, 2000), fragmentation of
habitat (Sjogren, 1991, Marsh and Trenham, 2000), and
alteration of species composition of communities
through the introduction of exotic predators and
pathogens (Beebee, 1977). In addition, acidification and
other chemical pollution, alteration of climate (Pounds
and Crump, 1994), disease and road kill (Carey, 1993,
2000) are candidates for the amphibian decline.
Relatively few caudate species occur in Iran. These
include seven species of the genera Triturus,
Batrachuperus, Neurergus, and Salamandra (Balutch
and Kami, 1995). Newts of the genus Neurergus have a
relatively wide geographic distribution, ranging from
western Iran (Zagros Mountains) and extending into Iraq
and southern Turkey (Balutch and Kami, 1995). There is
no sufficient information regarding the geographic dis-
tribution of the three species of newts that occur in west-
ern Iran. Previous investigations indicate that the pri-
mary distribution range of Neurergus microspilotus is in
the mid-Zagros range at the border of Iran and Iraq
(Nesterov, 1917; Schmidtler and Schmidtler, 1975). This
information also indicates that Neurergus kaiseri and
Neurergus crocatus are expected to occur in southern
and northern parts of the Zagros Range, respectively.
Recent investigations on N. microspilotus confirms that
this newt occurs in highland streams in the mid-Zagros
region (Assadian and Sharifi, 2002; Rastegar Pouyani
and Assadian, 2002).
The aims of the present study are to determine the
geographic distribution and conservation biology of
Neurergus microspilotus. To improve conservation
efforts related to this species, information is needed on
physico-chemical characters of the habitat. For this rea-
son, we measured some variables in the aquatic environ-
ment and adjacent terrestrial habitats.
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 225
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Figure 1. Geographic distribution of Neurergus microspilotus in streams of the mid-Zagros Range in western Iran.
Those streams with the species have been shown by (1). Those streams that expected to have the animal are shown
by (2).
Study Areas
The Iranian basin is a large triangular depression flanked
by Elbourz Mountains in the north and the Zagros
Mountains in the west. The Zagros Mountains extend
diagonally from eastern Turkey to the north of the
Persian Gulf and Pakistan border. This range is part of a
greater geographic unit arising from the east of the
Anatolian Plateau of Turkey and expanding southward
to include Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and further east to
the western edge of the Tibetan Plateau. The Zagros
Mountains act as barriers to the incoming air parcels
from the west and receive precipitation according to
their height and longitude. In general, the northern and
western portions of the range receive considerably more
rainfall than those in the south and east. The average
annual precipitation in the northern Zagros ranges from
400 to 800 mm. per year. Most of the central and south-
ern Zagros receive between 300 and 500 mm
(Ghobadian, 1990).
The western Zagros Range meets the northern
Mesopotamian Plain, a low land with a hot and dry cli-
mate. In some parts of the Zagros Range, where this
meeting takes place over a relatively short distance a
steep environmental gradient is encountered where high
altitude and cold climate from the Iranian Plateau dif-
fuse into the low altitude and warm Mesopotamian Plain
in just few kilometers. The weather condition in the
western edge of the Iranian Plateau in the mid-Zagros
Range is characterized by a pronounced seasonal varia-
tion including a long freezing period in winter and a
mild summer. Although the average annual precipitation
in this area is around 500 mm, most of this comes as
snow. As a result, many seasonal and permanent streams
at the western side of the Zagros Range are nourished by
heavy snow accumulated on the high mountains. In the
lowlands of the northern Mesopotamian Plain, which in
some parts lie only 20 or 30 km from cold uplands, sum-
mers are hot and dry and winters are free of frost.
Precipitation in this area approaches 400 mm per annum,
rarely appearing as snow. Information obtained from
Ravansar Synoptic Station (20 km from Kavat Stream in
the highlands) and Sarepolezahab on the northern
Mesopotamian Plain (40 km away from Kavat Stream)
summarizes the annual climatological data for these two
contrasting environments.
Materials and Methods
Streams, ponds, and springs were searched for adults
and larvae of Neurergus microspilotus in the mid-Zagros
Range in Kermanshah and Kurdistan provinces in west-
ern Iran in the spring and summer 2001 and 2002. In
streams where the salamander was found, channel sub-
strate, channel width, adjacent riparian plant community
type, and land use practice were determined. Where pos-
sible, relative abundance of N. microspilotus was deter-
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 226
Table 1. Altitude at head stream, approximate length of the streams and amount of discharge (I/s) in streams where
Neurergus microspilotus was sighted.
* Based on measurement made by department of water resource.
** - Discharge measured in field by determining the velocity of water and the extent of cross-section.
mined and expressed as individuals per every ten paces.
In small streams where there was no routine hydrologi-
cal measurement of water discharge, the water discharge
was estimated by measuring velocity of water and extent
of cross-section width of the channel. In Kavat Stream,
where highest relative abundance of N. microspilotus
was found, visual estimates were made of percent chan-
nel substrate composition (Wilkins and Peterson, 2000)
by bedrock, boulder (>256mm diameter), cobble (64-
256 mm diameter), gravel (16-64 mm diameter), pebble
(2-16 mm diameter), fine sediment and coarse woody
debris. In these streams several water characteristics
were measured. These include dissolved oxygen
(Winkler method), temperature (glass thermometer),
electrical conductivity (conductivity meter), N03 and
P04 (spectrophotometer).
Results
The geographic distribution of Neurergus microspilotus
in its Iranian range is shown in Figured. These are
Kavat Stream (34° 53' N, 46° 31' E), Dorisan Stream
(35° 21 ' N, 46° 24' E), Ghorighaleh Stream (34° 54' N,
46° 30' E), Najar Stream (35° 06' N, 46° 19' E), and
Paveh Rood Stream (35° 06' N, 46° 17' E). Apart from
streams in which the newt has already been observed,
there are three other streams where, on the basis of inter-
views with local inhabitants, the presence of this animal
is likely. These streams are upstream of Marakhil River
(35° 02’ N, 46° 1 V E), Shamshir Stream (34° 59’ N, 46°
25’ E) and Hajij Stream (35° 08’ N, 46° 19’ E). Altitude,
approximate length of the streams in which N. microspi-
lotus is expected to occur, geographic position, and
water discharge are shown in Table 1 .
Physico-chemical characteristics in streams with N.
microspilotus are shown in Table 1. Water analysis has
been carried out in upper and lower reaches of
Ghorighala Stream in order to demonstrate the human
impact on the water quality.
Occurrence of the yellow spotted newt in different
aquatic microhabitats has been evaluated using the
Wilkins and Peterson (2000) classification of channel
substrate including bedrock, boulder, cobble, gravel,
pebble and fine sand sediment. The yellow spotted newt
occupies an assortment of aquatic microhabitats during
the breeding season. Visual determination of substrate
texture in Kavat Stream indicated that this newt tended
to occupy substrates that are gravel or pebble (60%).
Figure 3 demonstrate the frequency distribution of sub-
strate classes used by this newt.
Table 2. Physico-chemical characteristics of water where Neurergus microspilotus was found.
Vol. 10, p. 227
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
50
35
25
15
5
-5
Sarpolzahab Climograph
Figure 2. Climographs representing the pattern of precip-
itation and temperature in Ravansar at the western edge
of the Iranian Plateau and Sarepolezahab in the northern
Mesopotamian Plain. Data are 20 years mean monthly
temperature and rainfall collected at the synoptic stations
in these two cities.
Discussion
The presence of Neurergus microspilotus in Ghorighaleh
Stream has also been reported in previous studies
(Nesterov, 1917; Schmidtler and Schmidtler, 1975).
Assadian and Sharifi (2002) and Rastegar Pouyani and
Assadian (2002) have reported Neurergus microspilo-
tus in this stream. Papenfuss and Sharifi also collected
several salamanders from this stream in Spring 2000.
No information is available regarding the occurrence of
Neurergus microspilotus in other streams, therefore, the
other four streams are new records for N. microspilotus
in its Iranian range.
All Neurergus streams reported in this study with
originated from the western edge of the Iranian Plateau
(Figure 2) and join to the Dez-Karkheh watershed sys-
tem in the northern Mesopotamian Plain and finally
enter into the Persian Gulf. All these stream are first
order streams located at relatively high altitude (1100-
1600 m) and join to the main rivers in the lowland (300-
600 m) of the catchments (Table 1).
Neurergus microspilotus is a medium size salaman-
40
Bedrock Boulder Cobble Gravel Pebble Sand
Figure 3. Percent occurrence of Neurergus microspilo-
tus in various substrate size group in Kavat Stream
(n=42).
der with a slender body. Adults reach a length (snout to
vent) of 60-70 mm (mean=65.6, sd=4.63, n=20). Adults
are black dorsally and laterally, with greenish yellow
blotches. The spots are distributed on the salamander’s
body without an obvious pattern. Neurergus microspilo-
tus characteristically possess broad heads with blunt,
rounded snout. N. microspilotus is also structured for
swimming using their laterally compressed tails for
propulsion and steering during swimming.
The prevailing climatic conditions are distinctly
different between and within streams. Since these
streams are located at the western edge of the Iranian
Plateau, the climatic conditions may vary considerably
at the upper reaches compared with lower reaches of the
same streams. At the same time it appears that streams
closer to the Mesopotamian Plain are experiencing cli-
matic conditions that are different with those that are
located at the western edge of the Iranian Plateau.
Because of the steep environmental gradient the streams
occupied by Neurergus microspilotus can be convenient-
ly divided into two groups. Those located in the high
altitude and cold weather regions on the western Iranian
Plateau (Kavat, Ghorighaleh, Dorisan and Shamshir
streams) and those in the north and north eastern part of
the range which because of lower elevation experience
warmer climate (Marakhil River, Dareh Najar and
Darian streams). In Dareh Najar Stream where very few
Neurergus microspilotus were located, and also in
Marakhil and Darian streams where the animal is report-
edly seen, it is possible that the animal drifted by the
action of water currents. It is also possible that the lower
relative abundance in N. microspilotus in Dareh Najar
and possibly in the other two streams is due to the lower
altitude and the vicinity to the northern Mesopotamian
Plain.
Terrestrial habitats occupied by N. microspilotus
include diverse community types including oak-pista-
chio open woodlands dominated by Quersus branti and
Pistachio spp. This woodland grows on various soil
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 228
types, including deep sandy loam soils at the bottom of
valleys or gravelly soils on the slopes of steep valleys.
In warmer parts of its range, riparian vegetation may
also contain willow ( Salix spp.) or shrubs such as
Cerrasns and Amygdale (Amygdalus spp.). In colder
parts of the range the riparian vegetation may be charac-
terized by more hydrophobic plants such as sedges
0 Carex spp.) and sphagnum moss (, Sphagnum spp.).
Neurergus microspilotus moves from its wintering
site to the breeding streams as soon as the spring melt
occurs, from late January through early March. Within
its range, in high altitude-cold weather regions, egg-lay-
ing was observed in early May. However, it appears
that the reproductive pattern of N. microspilotus is not
tightly synchronized because unhatched eggs have been
observed as late as mid-June. No breeding activity, eggs,
or juveniles of N. microspilotus have been observed in
the low altitude warm climate part of the range. Eggs of
N. microspilotus are laid singly or in small clumps on
vegetation or on rocks. The number of oocytes in a
female dissected in laboratory was 108. Laboratory
observations of larval growth and development indicate
that larvae complete the metamorphosis in the first year.
In early autumn they still possess their gills. Larvae with
large heads, well developed dorsal fins, and bushy gills
have the ability to react suddenly with a whole body
reaction to external stimulus.
Although no information is available regarding
wintering activity of Neurergus microspilotus in its
Iranian range, the appearance of the animal in early
spring and disappearance in summer implies that this
newt requires both upland and wetland habitat that con-
tain suitable aquatic environment during the breeding
season and subterranean burrows appropriate for winter-
ing. These normally include an aquatic environment for
breeding and a terrestrial habitat where juveniles and
adults spend most of their time.
Habitat loss through divergence of streams for irri-
gation of cultivated lands is probably the single most
important factor that threatens Neurergus microspilotus
in its Iranian range. Traditionally, due to the lack of land
in steep valleys in the mid-Zagros Range, extensive
attempts have been made to construct a complex of rein-
forced terraces of land, which is cultivated for walnut
and other orchard trees. Water is diverted from its natu-
ral channel to irrigate these lands. Although no harm is
directed toward N. microspilotus in these orchards, the
impact of land use alteration especially in dry periods
causes many of these creatures to be deprived of a
healthy aquatic environment.
Although human settlement in the mid-Zagros area
is characteristically less developed compared with other
localities in western Iran, Neurergus microspilotus is
experiencing an environmental impact similar to that
found in more urbanized areas in the country. For exam-
ple, Ghorighaleh Stream originates from a cave that has
been developed by a reclamation project for visitors.
Since the construction of this unit the stream is suffering
from gross pollution caused by thousands of visitors.
Changes in water characteristics in the upper and lower
reaches of the stream are shown in Table 2. Although in
2000 and 2001 numerous Yellow Spotted Newts were
reported (Assadian and Sharifi, 2002; Rastegar Pouyani
and Assadian, 2002) no newts were seen in 2002. The
absence of Neurergus microspilotus is presumably due
to the human impacts resulting from an ecotourism cen-
ter developed in 1999 at the Ghorighaleh Cave where
the source of the stream is located. Massive solid waste
disposed by thousands of visitors together with raw
sewage released to the stream by residents of
Ghorighaleh Village can be observed in the upper reach-
es of this stream although only changes in dissolved
oxygen are evident in physico-chemical characteristics
measured in this study.
Conclusions
Although Neurergus microspilotus has been virtually
extirpated from one of five known breeding streams in
its Iranian range, it does not appear to be in immediate
danger of extinction because one is likely to find this
newt occur in other streams in the area. However, the sit-
uation for N. microspilotus is not promising as the major
threatening factors such as habitat destruction and water
pollution are operating. Robust populations occur in at
least in one of its habitats (Kavat Stream). However, the
lack of information essential to estimate population size
and population trends makes it difficult to assess conser-
vation status of this salamander. Future work should
examine the long-term effects of anthropomorphic
impacts associated with land use alteration and pollu-
tion.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to express their gratitude to Professor
D. B. Wake for his great help in reviewing the manu-
script. This study was supported by Razi University
grant.
Literature Cited
Assadian, S. and Z. Sharifi. 2002. Distribution and con-
servation status of Neurergus microspilotus in west
em Iran. 1st Iranian conference on Animal Science
and Biodiversity.
Vol. 10, p. 229
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Beebee, T. J. C. 1977. Enviromental change as a cause
ot Natterjack Toad (Bufo calamita) declines in
Britain. Biological Conservation 11:87-102.
Baloutch, M. and H. G. Kami. 1995. Amphibians of
Iran. Tehran University Publications. [In Farsi]
Carey, C. 1993. Hypotheses concerning the causes of the
disappearance of boreal toads from the mountains
of Colorado. Conservation Biology 7:355-362.
Carey, C. 2000. Infectious disease and worldwide
declines of amphibian populations, with comments
on emerging diseases in coral reef organisms and in
humans. Enviromental Health Perspectives,
1 08(Suppl): 143-150.
Gardner, T. 2001. Declining amphibian populations: a
global phenomenon in conservation biology.
Animal biodiversity and conservation 24.2:25-44.
Ghobadian, A. 1990. Natural features of the Iranian
Plateau. Kerman University Publication Centre.
Kerman, Iran.
Marsh, D. M. and P. C. Trenham. 2000. Metapopulation
dynamics and amphibian conservation.
Conservation Biology 15:40-49.
Nesterov, P. V. 1917. Tri novych chvostatych amfibii is
kurdistana. Annuaire du Musee Zoologique de
L’Academie des Sciences, Petrograd 21:1-30.
Pounds, J. A. and M. L. Crump. 1994. Amphibian
declines and climate disturbance: the case the
Golden Toad and the Harlequin Frog. Conservation
Biology 8:72-85.
Rastegar Pouyani, N. and S. Assadian. 2002. Sexual
dimorphism in Neurergus microspilotus
(Caudata:Salamandridae). 1st Iranian conference of
Animal Science and Biodiversity.
Sala, O. E., F. S. I. Chapin, J. J. Armesto, E. Berlow, J.
Bloomfield, R. Dirzo, E. Huber-Sanwald, L. F.
Huenneke, R. B. Jackson, A. Kinzig, R. Leemans,
M. Lodge, H. A. Mooney, M. Oesterheld, N. L.
Pofif, M. T. Sykes, B. H. Walker, M. Walker, and D.
H. Wall. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the
year 2100. Science 287: 1770-1774.
Sjogren, P. 1991. Extinction and isolation gradients in
metapopulations: the case of the pool frog {Rana
lessonae). Biological Journal of the Linnean
Society 42:135-147.
Schmidtler, J. J. and J. F. Schmidtler. 1975.
Untersuchujngen an westpersischen Bergbach-
molchen der Gattung Neurergus Caudata,
Salamandridae). Salamandra 11:84-98.
Wake, D. B. 1991. Declining amphibian populations.
Science 253:860
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol.IO, pp. 230-234
An Investigation on the Blood Cells of the Leopard Gecko,
Eublepharis angramainyu (Reptilia: Sauria: Eublepharidae)
Murat Tosunoglu1, Dinner Ayaz2, Cemal Varol Tok1, and Ba^aran Dulger1
1 Qanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Faculty of Science-Literature, Department of Biology, Terzioglu Campus,
Qanakkale, Turkey
2Ege University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, 35100 Bornova, Izmir , Turkey
Abstract. - In this study, blood cell counts and sizes in three adult Eublepharis angramainyu specimens (one male,
two female) collected from SE Anatolia (Sanlurfa - Birecik). The number of erythrocytes in 1 mm3 ranged between
870,000 and 950,000 (average 910,000). The mean total length of erythrocytes was calculated as 20.35 pm, the width
as 10.59, the size as 169.68 pm2; the mean nucleus length as 7.50 pm, the width as 4.15 and the size as 24.47 pm2.
Small lymphocytes had a mean diameter of 9.78 pm, big lymphocytes 13.71 pm, monocytes 15.37 pm, neutrophiles
16.56 pm, eosinophiles 17.59 pm, and basophiles 12.87 pm. The mean length of thrombocytes was measured at 8.82
pm, and the width at 5.93 pm.
Key words. - Eublepharis angramainyu , Sauria, blood cell count, blood smears, erythrocytes, leucocytes, thromb-
ocytes.
Introduction
Eublepharis angramainyu Anderson and Leviton, 1966,
also known as the “leopard gecko”, was first found
between Masjid Soleyman and Batsvand in the Khuzes-
dan province of Iran. The species was reported to range
in the western foothills of the Zagros Mountains and
Mesopotamia in Iraq and Iran, and NE Syria with a ver-
tical distribution of 300 to 1000 meters (Anderson and
Leviton, 1966; Leviton et al., 1992; Disi and Bohme,
1996; Anderson, 1999). Studies conducted in recent
years (Go9men et al., 2002) established that the species
also inhabited SE Anatolia (Sanliurfa-Birecik).
Although there are a number of studies on the distribu-
tion, morphology and ecology of the species (Anderson
and Leviton, 1966; Leviton et al., 1992; Disi and
Bohme, 1996; Anderson, 1999; Go9men et al., 2002), a
literature review has not revealed any detailed haemato-
logical studies.
Most studies on the haematology of different spe-
cies are related to blood cell counts (Alder and Huber,
1923; Hutchison and Szarski, 1965; Duguy, 1970;
Arikan, 1989) and blood cell sizes (Szarski and Czopek,
1966; Hartman and Lessler, 1964; Atatiir et al., 1998,
1999). The number haematological studies related to
amphibian and reptile species living in Anatolia has
been increasing in recent years (Arkan, 1989; Atatiir et
al., 1998, 1999, 2001; Sevin9 et al., 2000). In this study,
the number and sizes of blood cells of Eublepharis
angramainyu were determined and photographs of their
blood cells presented.
Materials and Methods
Three adult specimens (one male, two female) examined
in this study were collected near £i9ekalan Village
between 2200-2400 hours at an altitude of 400 m during
the species breeding season (01 July, 2002). Blood sam-
ples were taken within the first three days after the spec-
imens were collected live in the wild and brought to the
laboratory.
Blood cell counts were carried out by means of
Neubauer hemocytometer. Hayem solution was used to
dilute the erythrocytes. Wright- Stained blood smears
were made use of in the measurement (erythrocytes, leu-
cocytes and thrombocytes) and computation of blood
cells. The necessary blood samples were obtained by
cardiac (ventriculus) puncture, via heparinized hemat-
ocrit capillaries. Blood cell measurements were taken by
means of a MOB-l-15x ocular micrometer. On each
blood smear, measurements related to 40 randomly cho-
sen erythrocytes (total erythrocyte length, total erythro-
cyte width, nucleus length and nucleus width) were
made, and the nucleus size was calculated) according to
the formula EL.EW./4 and the nucleus size according to
the formula NL.NW./4 (Duguy, 1970; Atatiir et&al.,
2001). Moreover, micrometric measurements were
made on leucoytes and thrombocytes. Photographs of
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol.10, p. 231
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Figure 1 : The blood cells of Eublepharis angramainyu. A-
erythrocytes, B- small lymphocyte, C- large lymphocyte,
D- monocyte, E- neutrophil, F- eosinophil, G- basophil,
H- a cluster of thrombocytes.
blood cells were taken using a Carl Zeiss Jena micro-
scope at 40x magnification.
Results
Male and female specimens were assessed together as
there were no significant differences between them with
respect to the number and size of blood cells. As in other
lizrds, the erythrocytes belonging to Eublepharis angra-
mainyu are also ellipsoidal cells with nuclei. The nuclei
are also ellipsoidal, somewhat regular and centrally
located (Figure 1A). The mean total length of the eryth-
rocytes (L) was calculated as 20.35 pm the width (W) as
10.59 pm, the size (S) as 169.68 pm2; the mean nucleus
length (NL) as 7.50 pm, the width (NW) as 4.15 pm,
and the size (NL) as 24.47 pm2. The number of erythro-
cytes in 1 mm3 of blood ranged between 870,000 and
950,000 (average 910,000) (Table 1).
Lymphocytes have a spherical shape. Both small
and large lymphocytes were examined in the blood
smears prepared (Figure IB, C). Large lymphocytes
were 13.71 pm in diameter and had a large cytoplasmic
zone and a centrally-located, large, round nucleus. The
cytoplasm is stained pale blue and the nucleus purplish
blue using the Wright Stain. No granule formation was
observed in the cytoplasm. Small lymphocytes had a
mean diameter of 9.78 pm (Table 1). The large nucleus
covers the majority of the cell’s area; the cytoplasm is in
the shape of a thin ring. Lymphocytes are the most com-
monly seen leucocytes in the preparates.
Although resembling the large lymphocytes in size,
monocytes are easily distinguished from the shape of
the nucleus (Figure ID). They have a mean diameter of
15.37 pm Granule formation was observed in the cyto-
plasm (Table 1). The nucleus is not oval, but depressed
on one side and occupies at least half of the cell. The
cytoplasm is stained light purple and the nucleus dark
blue. They are the second most common leucocytes
after lymphocytes and neutrophiles.
Neutrophiles are spherical cells with a mean diame-
ter of 16.56 pm (Table 1). Using the Wright Stain, the
cytoplasm is stained light blue and the nucleus dark
blue. There are very fine granules in the cytoplasm (Fig-
ure IE). The nucleus is a structure with lobes and seg-
ments. They are the most common leucocytes second to
lymphocytes.
Eosinophiles have a diameter of 1 7.59 pm (Table 1 ).
The cytoplasm is stained light blue and the nucleus dark
blue. Large, round, bright red granules within the cyto-
plasm strike eye as the most distinctive characteristic of
these cells (Figure IF). The nucleus was seen to have
two lobes. These cells take the fourth place in the prepa-
ration of smears after lymphocytes, monocytes and neu-
trophiles.
Basophiles are oval-shaped with a mean diameter
of 12.87 pm (Figure 1G and Table 1). When stained by
means of the Wright Stain, dark bluish purple granules
within the light blue cytoplasm are in a position marking
the dark blue nucleus. These cells are rarely seen in the
preparates.
Thrombocytes are spindle-shaped cells with a mean
length of 8.82 pm, a width of 5.93 pm (Figure 1H and
Table 1). In the Wright-Stained preparates, dark stained
cells with large oval nuclei and small irregular cytopla-
sic zones form groups of two or more.
2004
0, p. 232
Table 1: The established counts, measurements and sizes concerning the blood cells of Eublepharis angr
amainyu (in m and m2). N: Number of specimens; n: Number of measurements/computings in each speci
men; Ext: extreme values; SD and SE: standard deviations and the standard errors of the means,
respectively.
Table 2: The number of erythrocytes in 1 mm3 of blood in different lizard species.
Vol.10, p. 233
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Table 3: Sizes of erythrocytes and nuclei in different lizard species according to various researchers (EL/
EW: Erythrocyte Length/Erythrocyte Width Ratio, ES: Erythrocyte Size (pm2), NL/NW: Nucleus Length/
Nucleus Width Ratio, NS: Nucleus Size (pin2), N/C: Nuclear surface/Cell surface ratio).
Discussion Literature Cited
As stated in the ‘Results’ section, E. angramainyu spec-
imens were collected during the mating season and did
not display sexual dimorphism with respect to the num-
ber of erythrocytes and sizes. It has been found that
there are significant differences among lizard families
with respect to the number and size of erythrocytes, and
the members of Gekkonidae have the highest number of
erythrocytes among lizards (Alder and Huber, 1923;
Hutchison and Szarski, 1965; Duguy, 1970). Values
belonging to the number of blood cells determined in
diffeent lizard species (Table 2), by various researchers
were compared with those we obtained for E. angra-
mainyu in the present study, and it was established that
the number of erythrocytes in 1 mm3 of blood was very
close to that of Hemidactylus turcicus (Gekkonidae)
species, but different from that of other lizard species.
Values we obtained in E. angramainyu with respect
to the sizes of erythrocytes and nuclei were compared
with those determined for some lizard species (Table 3),
and it was found that values concerning the sizes of
erythrocytes and nuclei were very close to those of spe-
cies belonging to Gekkonidae family. When compared
with the other lizard species, E. angramainyu can be
said to have the largest erythrocytes with respect to the
sizes of erythrocytes and nuclei.
Alder, A. and E. Huber. 1923. Untersuchungen iiber
Blutzellen und Zellbildung bei Amphibien und
Reptilien. Folia Haematologica 29: 1-22.
Anderson, S. C. and A. E. Leviton. 1966. A new species
of Eublepharis from Southwestern Iran (Reptilia:
Gekkonidae). Occasional Papers of the California
Academy of Science 53:1-5.
Anderson, S. C. 1999. The Lizards of Iran (Contribu-
tions to Herpetology Vol. 15). Society for the Study
of Amphibians and Reptiles, Missouri, USA. 422
pp.
Arikan, H. 1989. Anadolu'daki Rana ridibunda (Anura:
Ranidae) populasyonlarinin kan hticrelerinin sayisi
bakirmndan incelenmesi. Turkish Zoology 13:54-
59.
Atatiir, M. K., H. Arikan, and A. Mermer. 1998. Eryth-
rocyte sizes of some Urodeles from Turkey. Turkish
Journal of Zoology 22:89-91.
Atatiir, M. K., H. Arikan, andi. E. Qevik. 1999. Erythro-
cyte sizes of some Anurans from Turkey. Turkish
Journal of Zoology 23:111-114.
Atatiir, M. K., H. Arkan, i. E. £evik, and A Mermer.
2001. Erythrocyte measurements of some Scincids
from Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology 25:149-
152.
2004
Vo) JO, p. 234
Disi, A. M., and W. Bohme. 1996. Zoogeography of the
amphibians and reptiles of Syria, with additional
new records. Herpetozoa 9(l/2):63-70.
Duguy, R. 1970. Numbers of blood cells and their varia-
tion. Pp. 93-109. In C. Gans and F. H. Pough (eds.),
Biology of Reptilia, Volume 3. Academic Press,
London and New York.
Go9men, B., M. Tosunoglu, and D. Ayaz. 2002. First
Record of the Leopard Gecko, Eublepharis angra-
mainyn (Reptilia: Sauria: Eublepharidae) from
Anatolia. Herpetological Journal 12(2):79-80.
Hartman, F. A. and M. A. Lessler. 1964. Erythrocyte
measurements in Fisches, Amphibia and Reptiles.
Biological Bulletin 126:83-88.
Hutchison, H. V. and H. Szarski. 1965. Number of
erythrocytes in some Amphibians and Reptiles.
Copeia 3:373-375.
Leviton, A. E., S. C. Anderson, K. Adler, and S. A.
Minton. 1992. Handbook to Middle East Amphibi-
ans and Reptiles. In Contributions to Herpetology,
Vol. 8., Society for the Study of Amphibians and
Reptiles. Missouri, USA.
Sevin9, M., i. H. Ugurta§, and H. S. Yildirimhan. 2000.
Erythrocyte measurements in Lacerta rudis (Rep-
tilia, Lacertidae). Turkish Journal of Zoology
24:207-209.
Szarski, H. and G. Czopek. 1966. Erythrocyte diameter
in some amphibians and reptiles. Bulletin of the
Polish Academy of Sciences Biological Sciences
14(6):433-437.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, pp. 235
A Record of Boiga ochracea walli (Stoliczka, 1870) from Bangladesh
M. Farid Ahsan* and Shayla Parvin
Department of Zoology, University of Chittagong, Chittagong 4331, Bangladesh.
5jc
Corresponding author E-mail: mfahsan@ctgu.edu
Abstract. - Two specimens of Boiga ochracea specimens from Bangladesh are referred to Boiga ochracea walli.
The locality data for these specimens are lost, but they are probably form the University of Chittagong campus.
These are the first records of this subspecies for Bengladesh.
Key words. - Boiga ochracea , Bangladesh.
While identifying snake species preserved in the
Departmental Museum of Zoology, Chittagong
University (CU), two specimens of Boiga ochracea
walli (Stoliczka, 1870) were found. One was collected
in 1975, but the localities where they were found are
unknown. Both specimens were probably collected form
the University of Chittagong campus. The occurrence of
Boiga ochracea in Bangladesh was first reported by
Khan (1982) based on a specimen collected from
Chittagong Hill Tracts. Khan (1982) did not identify the
specimen to subspecies. Smith (1943) reported the sub-
species range as Burma (now Myanmar) south of Lat.
25°; Tenasserim; the Andaman and Nicobar Islands.
Both localities of Boiga ochracea walli from Chittagong
(this report) and B. ochracea from Chittagong Hill
Tracts (Khan 1982) are close to Myanmar and south of
the latitude mentioned by Smith (1943). This report
extends the subspecies range up to Bangladesh and it
may occur in other parts of the country like Greater
Sylhet, Cox's Bazar, and the districts of Chittagong Hill
Tracts (i.e., Rangamati, Khagracheri and Bandarbans) as
they have similar habitats.
The CU specimens have the following characters
(although the natural colour may have changed due to
the effects of preservation): faded greyish above, verte-
bral series of scales paler than others, ventral side of
body whitish. Smith (1943) described the subspecies as
"greyish, reddish or yellowish brown above (coral red in
life), some of the scales finely edged with black and
forming more or less distinct transverse lines or bars,
best marked in the young; the vertebral series of scales
sometimes lighter than the others; paler below; lips and
chin whitish".
The CU specimens have eight supra labials, 4th, 5th
and 6th below the eyes; one pre and two post-oculars
present. Smith (1943) stated that there is normally one
pre-ocular, not reaching the upper surface of the head;
anterior genials about as long as the posterior, latter in
contact with one another or separated by small scales;
vertebrals strongly enlarged. The measurements of the
CU specimens are compared below with those reported
by Smith (1943).
Literature Cited
Khan, M. A. R. 1982. Wildlife of Bangladesh - a check-
list. Dhaka University Press, Dhaka. 173 pp.
Smith, M. A. 1943. The fauna of British India, including
Ceylon and Burma. Reptilia and Amphibia, Vol. 3
Serpentes. Taylor and Francis Ltd., London. 583 pp.
Table 1. - The table shows that the Smith's (1943) specimens and the present ones are similar.
or (1943)
2+3
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, pp. 236-240
Some Aspects of Breeding Biology of the Bengal Lizard
(Varanus bengalensis) in Bangladesh
M. Farid Ahsan1 and M. Abu Saeed2
^ Department of Zoology, University of Chittagong, Chittagong 4331, Bangladesh; E-mail: mfahsan(fctgu.edu
-AGROCARE, Golden Plaza (1st Floor), 58 Shaheed Taj uddin Ahmed Sharani, Mohakhali, Dhaka 1212,
Bangladesh
Abstract. - Some aspects of breeding biology of the Bengal, or Gray, Monitor Lizard ( Varanus bengalensis ) were
studied in the farm area of Azra Produces Impex (a private enterprise) at Bhaluka, Mymensingh from 1995 to 1997.
The feeding success, caring, egg-laying, clutch-size, incubation of neonate care were observed. The eggs were laid
between August and October with a mean clutch-size of 21.1 (range 10-32, n=25). The mean incubation period was
192.7 days (range 189-216 days, n=678) with a hatching success of 3.3% which was very low due to many reasons.
Some problems regarding farming of the species are discussed.
Key words. - Varanus bengalensis , Bengal lizard, breeding, farming, Bangladesh.
Introduction
The Bengal, or Gray, Monitor Lizard ( Varanus ben-
galensis) is one of the three varanid species found in
Bangladesh. It is most widely distributed throughout the
country, including many islands, in both forested and
non-forested open wooded areas. It is economically
important for its valuable skin and its role in the ecosys-
tem, especially in controlling some pests. In
Bangladesh, some tribes like the Shawtal, Kulee, Kukis,
etc., also eat its meat.
The few research works that have been done on
varanids in Bangladesh mainly deal with their distribu-
tion. However, Whitaker and Hikida (1981) and Akond
et al. (1982) briefly worked on the ecology and stomach
contents of varanids. There is no published report on the
captive breeding of varanids of Bangladesh. Azra
Produces Impex, a private enterprise, started a project in
Bangladesh on the farming of V bengalensis. As advisor
(MFA) and consultant (MAS) we looked into the bio-
logical aspects of the project. This paper deals with the
preliminary observations on feeding, caring, egg-laying,
clutch-size, incubation of eggs, and caring of hatchlings.
Some problems regarding farming of the species have
also been discussed.
Study Area and Study Animals
The Varanus breeding farm of Azra Produces Impex is
situated at Habirbari of Bhaluka Thana (Mymensign
District, Bangladesh, 24° 21' N and 90° 21' E). It is 71
km north of Dhaka City and located adjacent to the
Dhaka-Mymensign Highway. The farm was inaugurated
in June, 1995 within a concrete boundary wall (about 3
Figure 1. Adult Varanus bengalensis eating supplied
food.
m high including wire rope) enclosure with an entrance
(gate) on the western side along the said Highway. The
total area of the farm is 37.74 acres (16.77 ha). There are
50 ponds inside the farm and a lake excavated around
the periphery of the farm. One open wire-net enclosure
(37 m x 61 m x 1 m) with a concrete base (of 25.4 cm)
has also been made inside the farm area for some of the
lizards (about 200 individuals).
A total of 2, 112 Bengal lizards (685 [32.4%] males
and 1427 [67.6%] females) were released inside the
farm area. These lizards were captured by professional
hunters from wild stock (with the permission of the con-
cerned authority, Ministry of Environment and Forests,
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh) of
Greater Mymensign and Tangail districts between 4
June and 9 September, 1995. Before releasing, each
lizard was physically checked and sex recorded. Injured
and immature lizards were rejected.
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 237
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Figure 2. Eggs of Varanus bengalensis in a natural nest (left) and being prepared for artificial incubation (right).
Methods
Food. Cleaned pieces of stomach (omasum part only) of
bovines, collected from different slaughter houses of
Dhaka city, were supplied to the lizards as food. Food
was supplied only inside the wire-net enclosure in trays
(25.4 cm x 25.4 cm x 5 cm, made up of tin sheet). In
other parts of the farm, food was thrown near the roost-
ing places (close to bushes) of the lizards. Usually foods
were supplied to the lizards every alternate day (except
for Sunday) - half of the farm area was covered in one
day and the rest half in the next day. About 100-150 such
stomachs were offered to the lizards on every feeding
day (Fig. 1).
Eggs. Eggs (Fig. 2, Table 1) were collected from holes
in the soil (dug obliquely) and holes of termite mounds
(either natural or made by lizards) and placed inside arti-
ficial holes made in the incubation cages. Special pre-
cautions were taken during handling of eggs to avoid
shaking or turing upside down, so that, embryos do not
get loose or shift from the original position.
Incubation. An incubation area was selected inside the
farm where two cages were built (Fig. 3), each one hav-
ing a small entrance. Cage-I was closed cart-shaped
(12.5 m x 4.6 m x 2.6 m), made of wire-net (mesh size
5 mm x 5 mm) with a concrete base and supported by
rods. Inside the cage three artificial incubation beds
were built - western (1240 cm x 1 16 cm x 55 cm), mid-
dle (1240 cm x 110 cm x 48 cm) and eastern bed (1240
cm x 95 cm x 32 cm). Spaces between western and mid-
dle beds were 53 cm, and between middle and eastern
were 43 cm. In each bed, two storied oblique holes were
excavated - the western bed had holes only in the east-
ern side, the eastern only in the western side, and the
middle bed had holes on both sides. Sandy, granular, and
dry soils were placed on the floor of each hole and dry
sands on the hole mouth. The roof of each hole was
made by moist sandy loam. The top of each bed was
covered with grasses. Each hole (length 30 cm and
diameter 10 cm) was marked by numbered stick plate.
Altogether there were 190 holes in cage-I and 30 eggs
were placed in each hole. When all holes of cage-I were
filled with eggs (totalling 5,700), the second cage (cage-
II) was built in the eastern periphery of the cage-I. Cage-
II was closed rectangular-shaped (12.5 m x 7.9 m x 2.5
m) formed of wire-net (mesh size 5 mm x 5 mm) and
supported by rods and poles. Here, only pits were dug,
and 30 eggs were placed in each pit. There were 500
such pits (containing 14,499 eggs in total) in this cage
and each one was marked with numbered stick plate.
These pits were filled with loose soils in such a way that
a 5-7 cm thick soil layer was on the eggs. The pits were
covered with broad (palm) leaves during hot days to
retain moisture in the soil. When topsoil of cage-II was
too dry, water was added. Later on, some grasses grew
naturally.
Hatching and Hatchability. After two months of incu-
bation, several nests were excavated weekly to check for
hatching and 2-5 eggs were opened to see the develop-
ment of embryos (Fig. 4). Those hatched (Fig. 5) were
immediately transferred into baby nursery. When suffi-
cient number of hatchlings were obtained in cage-I, all
the remaining eggs which seemed to be still alive were
transferred into 7 big trays (0.5 m x 2.5 m x 0.25 m) in
the nursery, these trays were kept separate from the
hatched lizards by a wall of 1 m within the nursery. The
earlier mentioned precautions were taken during this
transfer. Eggs were placed half-buried in the tray soil
with the usual cover. Each tray was checked twice a day
(morning and late afternoon) and the number of hatch-
lings was recorded. Then hatchlings were released
immediately in the nursery after careful noting of their
measurements (Table 2).
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 238
Figure 3. Incubation cages for Varanus bengalensis. Cage I (left), Cage II (right). See text for description.
Table 1. Varanus bengalensis egg sizes (n=24).
Baby Nursery. The concrete floor of the nursery (9.5 m
x 3.6 m x 3 m) was covered with sandy loam soil. Tin
sheets (40 cm high) were fitted against the nursery walls
to prevent the escape of the baby lizards. Lumps of ter-
mite mounds containing termites (adults, mostly eggs
and larvae) were placed in the periphery of the nursery
as food for the hatchlings. Other foods offered to the
babies were crushed boiled poultry eggs, minced beef
and minced clean stomach of bovine. Two artificial
small water reservoirs (25.4 cm x 25.4 cm x 5 cm) were
made in the nursery.
All non-hatched eggs were piled and randomly 100
eggs from incubation cage-I and 150 from incubation
cage-II were opened to determine the percentage of
undeveloped eggs and dead embryos (Fig. 4).
Observations, Results, and
Discussion
Food. Besides the supplied food, lizards were also seen
to eat arthropods especially beetles and grubs from cow-
dung, and small fish (mainly Tilapia , which were
Table 2. Size of hatchling Varanus bengalensis (n=39).
* Total length (snout to tail tip), body length (snout
to anus), and tail length (anus to tail tip).
released in the lake for propagation).
Caring. Sick lizards were provided with food closer to
them. Medical treatment was not given.
Eggs. Eggs were white, oval, with soft leathery skin and
contained a large yolk supply. The farm staff collected a
total of 20,499 eggs from the holes of termite mounds
during 11 September to 30 October, 1995. Although the
first clutch of eggs (18) were found on 10 August, 1995
inside a termite mound on the embankment of a pond
inside the farm, this was not recorded by the farm staff
(so it is excluded from the total count). The average col-
lection of eggs was 512.67 + 134.49 (range 160-1210,
n=38 days) per day.
Whitaker and Hikida (1981) and Akond et al.
(1982) stated that the egg-laying period of Bengal lizard
in Bangladesh is November and December. Daniel
(1983), however, reported that eggs were collected from
mid April to October in India. In Sri Lanka, the peak
breeding period of Bengal lizard is January to April, but
eggs also occur during June to December in ground logs
or termite mounds (Deraniyagala, 1958). In the present
study the egg-laying period was much earlier than that
recorded by Whitaker and Hikida (1981) and Akond et
al. (1982).
The mean size of egg was 5.71 cm in length, 2.92
cm in width and 26.93 gm in weight (Table 1). From
India, Daniel (1983) reported that the average egg size
of gray lizard was 4.9 x 3.8 cm (range 4.7 x 3.6 to 5.5 x
4.4 cm, n=50) and weighed 1 1.4 gm (range 8.3-14.3 gm,
n=25). The size of eggs in this study (Table 1) is close to
that reported by Daniel (1983), but the weight data are
very different.
Clutch size, dutch size varies according to the size and
age of the females, larger and older females lay more
eggs than younger and smaller ones. The average clutch
size was 21.1 + 7.4 (range 10-32, n=25). The clutch
size of Bengal lizard was 8-32 (Whitaker and Hikida,
Vol. 10, p. 239
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Table 3. Minimum and maximum air temperatures and soil temperature (°C) during study period.
1981; Akond et al., 1982) and 20-30 (Khan, 1987) in
Bangladesh, while 8-30 in India (Daniel, 1983). The
range of present observation is close to the mentioned
works except for Khan (1987).
Incubation period. On average, the incubation period
of egg was 192.72 + 4.59 days (range 189-216 days,
n=678 eggs). The first lizard hatched on 18 March and
the last on 4 June, 1996. Most of the lizards hatched late
at night or early in the morning; some also hatched dur-
ing the day.
Previously recorded incubation periods for the
Bengal Monitor Lizards of Bangladesh were 7-8 months
(i.e., 210-240 days) (Whitaker and Hikida, 1981); 6-8
months (i.e. 180-240 days) (Akond et al., 1982) and 7-8
months (i.e. 210-240 days) (Khan, 1987). Daniel (1983)
mentioned that the incubation period of Bengal lizard in
India was 8-9 months (i.e. 240-270 days). The present
incubation period is closer to that recorded by Whitaker
and Hikida (1981) and Akond et al. (1982), but smaller
than that reported by Daniel (1983). The egg-hatching
month has been mentioned as July (Whitaker and
Hikida, 1981) and June-July (Akond et al., 1982) while
in the present observation it spreads over mid March to
early June.
The variation in the incubation period of the present
work and those of the above mentioned works could be
due to the effect of some ecological factors like temper-
ature, moisture, rainfall, etc. We recorded air tempera-
ture in the farm and soil temperature of nest of the incu-
bation cage-I (and later baby nursery) which give an
indication of these conditions (Table 3).
Hatchlings and hatching success. The average total
length and weight of the hatchlings were 19.72 cm and
13.61 gm, respectively (Table 2). Out of 20,499 eggs,
only 678 babies hatched. The hatching success, in this
case, was 3.3%. (All the hatched eggs [678] were from
cage-I only and the hatching success was 11.9%, but the
eggs from cage-II resulted the poor hatching success i.e.,
3.3%). After hatching out, a baby lizard did not eat for
the next 2-3 days due to a continued absorbance of its
yolk reserve. Neonate lizards ate termite eggs and larvae
from the supplied lumps of termite mounds inside the
Figure 4. Varanus bengalensis in two stages of development: embryo (left), newly hatched (right).
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 240
Figure 5. Varan us bengalensis neonates.
nursery and crushed boiled poultry eggs from the feed-
ing trays. They showed less interest to eat minced beef
and minced bovine stomach. Babies also drank water
and preferred to roost in cold, damp areas inside grasses
or water hyacinths, which were kept in a few places
inside the nursery.
The poor hatching success of eggs in this study was
most probably due to: (1) soil in the incubation cage-II
became compact due to rain and killed embryos; (2)
mis-handling of eggs by the staff during egg transplan-
tation; (3) unregulated temperature and moisture in the
incubation cages. Of these reasons, the first one was
most important because only 12 eggs hatched from the
incubation cage-II (where 14,799 eggs were transplant-
ed) and dead embryos or babies were found in 70% of
the eggs (n=140). On the other hand, we were not sure
whether all the unhatched eggs were fertilized or not.
The additional reason for this huge damage of eggs was
the negligence of the Managing Director of the project
to implement our suggestions in constructing incubation
cage-II.
Problems regarding farming
The following problems were faced during the study
period:
1 . The set up of the project is not well designed and
scientific.
2. Lack of electricity.
3. Instructions/suggestions given (jointly by the
advisor and consultant) to the Managing Director
(MD) of the project were not properly followed.
4. Research facilities provided by the farm are poor.
Recommendations
1. Lizards should be caged rather than distributing
them throughout the farm. A few small cages should
be built for research.
2. Needs devoted staff.
3. Needs electricity.
4. Incubation cages should be constructed like cage-I.
5. Needs incubation chamber, or at least a place(s)
where temperature and moisture fluctuaions are not
drastic.
6. Needs separate “nursery” cages for neonates and
juveniles.
7. Above all, instructions and suggestions proposed
jointly by the advisor and consultant should be con-
sidered in all activities.
Acknowledgments
Dr. M. A. G. Khan, Department of Zoology, University
of Chittagong has kindly reviewed this manuscript. The
proprietor and farm staff of Azra Produces Impex helped
us in various ways. We thank them all.
Literature Cited
Akond, A. W., F. Ahsan, and M. Rahman. 1982. Monitor
lizards of Bangladesh. Proceedings of the Second
National Conference on Forestry held in 21-26
January 1982:540-545.
Daniel, J. C. 1983. The book of Indian reptiles. Bombay
Natural History Society, Bombay. 141 pp.
Deraniyagala, P. E. P. 1958. Reproduction in the moni-
tor lizard, Varanus bengalensis (Daudin). Spolia
Zeylanica. 28:161-166.
Khan, M. A. R. 1987. Bangladesh er banayaprani, part I
(Wildlife of Bangladesh, vol. I). Bangla Academy
Press, Dhaka. 175 pp. (In Bengali).
Whitaker, R. and T. Hikida, 1981. Report of project for
mation mission to Bangladesh (monitor lizards).
FAO, Rome.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, pp. 241-244
A New Locality for the Rare Bornean Skink, Lamprolepis vyneri
(Shelford, 1905) (Sauria: Scincidae)
Indraneil Das
Institute of Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak,
94300, Kota Samar ahan, Sarawak, Malaysia; E-mail: idas@ibec.unimas.my
Abstract. - A specimen of the Bornean arboreal skink, Lamprolepis vyneri (Shelford, 1905), hitherto known from the
holotype from Gunung Balingan, Sibu Division, Sarawak, and a second possible specimen from the upper reaches of
Sungei Mahakam, Kalimantan, is reported from Bukit Balian, near the Kayan settlement of Kelep, at Sungei Asap, at
the base of Gunung Dulit, Kapit Division, Sarawak. The species is illustrated for the first time.
Key words. - Lamprolepis vyneri , redescription, Scincidae, Sarawak, Borneo.
Introduction
The genus Lamprolepis Fitzinger, 1843, which was
revived from the synonymy of Dasia Gray (1829), by
Greer (1970) contains four nominal species of arboreal
skinks. Two of these are endemic to Borneo (L. nieuwen-
huisii and L. vyneri ), a third ( L . leucosticta ) to Java
(Manthey and Grossmann, 1997:263) and the fourth {L.
smaragdina ) is widespread in the Philippines, Sulawesi,
Lesser Sundas, the Republic of Belau, the Carolines,
New Guinea, the Solomons and Santa Cruz Islands
(Brown and Alcala, 1980:76-79; Greer, 1970). The first
two species are arguably the least well known of all
Bornean lizards. L. nieuwenhuisii (Lidth de Jeude, 1905)
was described from "Long Bloe" (= Long Blu or Bloeoe,
00° 43' N; 114° 25' E), on the upper reaches of Sungei
Mahakam, Kalimantan Tengah Province, Indonesia;
RMNH 4455, holotype). It has subsequently been col-
lected from isolated localities in northern Borneo,
including Nanga Tekalit Camp on Sungei Mengiong,
Kapit Division (reported as Dasia vyneri by Lloyd et al.,
1968, based on FMNH 138542; 147562); and Pangkalan
Lobang at Niah National Park, Miri Division (FMNH
131528), both in Sarawak State; and Kiau, Gunung
Kinabalu National Park, Ranau District (MCZ 43494;
BMNH 1929.12.22.96 and ZRC 2.1595); and
Mahunbayon, Gunung Kinabalu National Park, Ranau
District (MCZ 43495), both in Sabah State, East
Malaysia.
Lamprolepis vyneri (Shelford, 1905) is more poorly
known. Named for Charles Vyner Brooke (1874-1963),
the Rajah Muda of Sarawak at the time of description of
the species, and subsequently, the Third Rajah of
Sarawak between 1917-1946, it is only known from the
holotype, BMNH 1946.8.15.56 (ex-BMNH
1909.8.18.2), from "Mount Balineau, Muka district,
Sarawak" (= Gunung Balingan, 01° 25' N; 1110 28' E,
Sibu Division, East Malaysia), according to the original
description. However, in the records of the Sarawak
Museum (Anon., 1903), the type locality is given as
"Mt. Balingean" (in Muka District, Sibu Division,
Sarawak). Lidth de Jeude (1905) questionably assigned
to this species a specimen from the upper reaches of
Sungei Mahakam (00° 30' S; 117° 15' E), Kalimantan
Timur Province, which apparently differed from
Shelford's (1905) species in some trivial details of squa-
mation and body proportions. The location of this spec-
imen is unknown, but was examined by De Rooij
(1915), who allocated it to the present species. This
species has never been illustrated.
A second specimen (ZRC 2.5513; Figs. 1-2) of
Lamprolepis vyneri is reported here from Bukit Belian
(03° 08' 34.4" N; 113° 55' 45.5" E), near the Kayan set-
tlement of Kelep, at Sungei Asap, situated at the base of
Gunung Dulit, Kapit District, Sarawak. It was collected
dead on 6 November 2001 from a logging road.
Material and Methods
The specimen was photographed upon collection, fixed
in neutral buffered formalin and subsequently trans-
ferred to 70% ethanol, within a week of collection. The
following measurements were taken with Mitutoyo™
dial caliper (to the nearest 0.1 mm): snout-vent length
(SVL; from tip of snout to vent), tail length (TL; from
vent to end of unregenerated tail; tip missing), tail width
(TW; measured at base of tail); head length (HL; dis-
tance between posterior edge of last supralabial and
snout-tip), head width (HW; measured at angle of jaws),
head depth (HD; maximum height of head, from occiput
to throat), ear length (EL; greater ear length); eye diam-
eter (ED; greatest diameter of orbit), eye to nostril dis-
tance (E-N; distance between anteriormost point of eyes
and nostrils), eye to snout distance (E-S; distance
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 242
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Figure 1. The Sungei Asap specimen of Lamprolepis vyneri (ZRC 2.5513), showing (left) general view of body and
(right) close-up of head and forebody.
between anteriormost point of eyes and tip of snout), eye
to ear distance (E-E; distance from anterior edge of ear
opening to posterior comer of eyes), intemarial distance
(IN; distance between nares), interorbital distance (10;
shortest distance between orbits), tibia length (TBL;
straight length of tibia, from knee to sole), in addition to
measurements of digits, taken on the left limbs, from the
base to tip. Scale counts and external observations of
morphology were made using an Olympus SZX9 dis-
secting microscope. Institutional abbreviations follow
Leviton et al. (1985), except ZRC is retained for USDZ,
following conventional usage.
Description of Lamprolepis vyneri from Bukit Belian,
Sungei Asap (ZRC 2.5513). - Habitus relatively slen-
der, snout- vent length 55.2 mm; head elongate (HL/SVL
ratio 0.20), narrow (HW/HL ratio 0.65), moderately
depressed (HD/HL ratio 0.11), slightly distinct from
neck; snout long (E-S/HW ratio 0.72), longer than the
eye diameter (ED/E-S ratio 0.75), projecting slightly
beyond mandible; interparietal distinct; parietal eye
absent; supraoculars four; second and third largest;
supraciliaries 8/8; first supraciliary contacts frontal;
scales on snout and forehead smooth; rostral contact
frontonasal posteriorly; rostral small, wider than deep
(rostral width = 2.0 mm; rostral depth = 1.2 mm;
width/depth ratio 1.67), contacted posteriorly by nasal
and frontonasal; posteroventrally, rostral in contact with
first supralabial; nares slit-like, situated on upper level
of nasal, oriented laterally; nasal in broad contact with
first supralabial; supranasals moderate in size, separat-
ed; frontonasal trapezoid, wider than long, contacting
frontal and prefrontals posteriorly; frontal longer than
frontonasal, not constricted laterally; frontoparietals in
contact with each other and with three supraoculars, and
posteriorly, with interparietal and parietals; a single pair
of parietals contacts interparietal; parietals separated
behind by an azygous scale; loreals two, anteriormost
longer than deep; a small dorsal presubocular, and a
wider ventral one; eye large (ED/HL ratio 0.35); post-
suboculars two; supralabials seven, with supralabials 4-
6 in suborbital position; supralabials three, fifth and
sixth larger than the others; infralabials six; lower eyelid
scaly; a single preocular between loreal and orbit; pos-
toculars two; pretemporals two; two anterior and two
posterior temporals; ear opening narrow, measuring 1.9
mm; situated laterally at a level slightly higher than
jaws; a few lobules around ear opening present; tympa-
num deeply sunk; eye-to-ear distance less than eye-to-
nostril distance (E-E/E-N ratio 1 .26); a pair of enlarged
nuchals, partially separated by a single cycloid scale;
mental large, semicircular, wider than deep; postmental
single, trapezoidal, larger than mental, its width 1.8 mm
or 25.4 per cent head width; postmental contacts first
infralabial only, bounded posteriorly by a pair of
smooth, squarish, juxtaposed chin shields that are in
contact; three pairs of enlarged chin shields, the first in
contact with each other, the second separated by a single
scale, the third separated by three scales; tongue narrow-
ly elongate, narrowed distally, with a median cleft and
scattered papillae on the dorsal surface; maxillary and
mandibular teeth small, undifferentiated.
Body slender, elongate (SVL/BW ratio 6.81); dor-
sum and venter with smooth scales, with faint striae,
scale size subequal dorsally as well as ventrally; anals
six, smooth; outer overlapping inner; preanals three, not
greatly enlarged, overlapped by last ventral, third pre-
anal exceeding its posterior level, over vent; flank scales
reduced in size.
Limbs well developed, pentadactyle; adpressed
limbs meeting at level of heels; lamellae under finger IV
numbering 18; lamellae under toe IV numbering 20; rel-
ative length of fingers (measurements in mm, in paren-
theses): 4 (4.5) > 3 (4.4) > 2 (3.5) > 5 (2.7) > 1 (2.0); rel-
ative length of toes: (measurements in mm, in parenthe-
ses): 4 (7.8) > 3 (5.6) > 5 (5.5) > 2 (4.7) > 1 (3.0).
Tail long, preserved tail length over 40.5 mm (tip
missing), longer than snout-vent length; tail base slight-
ly swollen; ventral surface of tail with smooth; subcau-
dals very wide; scales on the postanal region and at the
proximal part of the tail base smooth.
Coloration. - Forehead olive-yellow, edged with black;
dark smudges on forehead scales; scales on dorsum of
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 243
Figure 2. Head of Lamprolepis vyneri (ZRC 2.5513) in
dorsal (left) and ventral (right) views. Scale bars = 10
mm.
body bright yellow, edged with black, appearing as four
dark longitudinal lines that extend along the body to
slightly beyond the base of tail; yellow dorsolateral
stripe, 2-3 scale wide, runs from behind level of the axil-
la, across the inguinal region, continuing along the side
of the tail; venter, including the gular, pectoral and
abdominal regions, undersurface of tail and of limbs yel-
lowish-green, unpattemed; scales on flanks black-edged,
reddish-orange, with scattered yellow scales; the same
coloration is found on the upper surfaces of the fore and
hind limbs; tail alternately banded yellowish-brown,
each band one scale wide, and pale yellow; tongue and
inner lining of mouth yellowish-pink; inner lining of
body cavity yellowish-pink in preservative.
Measurements (in mm). - BW 8. 1 ; ED 3.8; E-E 4.8; EL
1.2; E-N 3.8; E-S 5.1; IN 1.7; IO 4.5; HD 5.8; HL 10.9;
HW 7.1; SVL 55.2; TBL 7.7; and TL 40.5 - original
unregenerated, tip missing; TW 5.3.
Scutellation. - Ventrals (between postmental and pre-
anal) 49; midbody scale rows 22; subcaudal count
unknown (tail-tip missing); supralabials seven (fourth,
fifth and sixth in suborbital position) and infralabials
six.
Variation. - The Sungei Asap specimen differs from the
holotype in the following particulars: SVL 55.2 vs 52.0
mm; supraoculars on left side four (vs five in the holo-
Figure 3. Map of Borneo showing the known localities
for Lamprolepis vyneri. 1 = Gunung Balingan, Sibu
Division (type locality); 2 = Bukit Balian, near Sungei
Asap, Kapit Division.
type, as shown on the apparently anomalous right side of
the head of the Bukit Belian specimen). The bright red
and yellow coloration of the flanks of the Bukit Belian
specimen turned to dark brown after three months of
storage in preservative. Shelford (1905), who presum-
ably examined a preserved specimen, reported the flanks
as being olive-gray, van Lidth de Jeude's (1905) speci-
men was 63 mm in SVL, and showed five black stripes,
but only three entering the sacral region and tail-base.
This poorly-preserved specimen was described as "putty
grey", with several cephalic scales edged with black.
Notes on Natural History. - The specimen being
reported here was found freshly dead on a logging track
at the base of Bukit Belian (03° 08' 34.4" N; 113° 55'
45.5" E), near Kelep, Sungei Asap, a Kay an resettlement
colony in Kapit (Seventh) Division, central Sarawak. It
may have fallen off a log that was being transported,
because the members of the genus are highly arboreal,
and the present specimen was otherwise physically
intact, except for the missing tail-tip, and not run over.
The area lies within a lowland dipterocarp forest with
strands of the Bornean ironwood tree, Eusideroxylon
zwageri (Iban name: Belian, which gives the hill its
name) at 186 m elevation. Perhaps coincidentally, the
holotype was taken at a similar-sounding locality,
Gunung Balingan, for which no general habitat descrip-
tion is available. One is therefore tempted to speculate
Vol. 10, p. 244
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
that both localities derive their names for their strands of
the Bornean ironwood, a dipterocarp much in demand
from the timber industry for its durability, and hence
threatened by logging. The new locality, at the base of
Gunung Dulit, is ca. 190 km east of the type locality,
across the Lumut Range (Fig. 3).
Acknowledgments
I thank the Institute of Biodiversity and Environmental
Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, for sup-
porting my research on the herpetofauna of Borneo, and
Esther Bala for field assistance. For loans of the holo-
types of Lamprolepis vyneri and L. nieuwenhuisii, I am
grateful to C. J. McCarthy, BMNH, and M. S.
Hoogmoed, RMNH, respectively. I would like to thank
R. F. Inger, A. Resetar and H. K. Voris, FMNH; J. E.
Cadle, J. Rosado and the late E. E. Williams, MCZ, and
K. K. P. Lim, P. K. L. Ng and C. M. Yang, ZRC, for per-
mitting me to examine comparative material under their
care and Allen Greer and an anonymous reviewer for
comments on a draft manuscript. Finally, thanks are due
to Gary Geller, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, National
Aeronautics and Space Administration, for generating
Fig. 3.
Literature Cited
Anonymous. 1903. Museum. The Sarawak Gazette
33:236.
Brown, W. C., and A. C. Alcala. 1980. Philippine lizards
of the family Scincidae. Silliman University.
Natural Science Monograph Series 2. Silliman
University Press, Dumaguete. 264 pp.
De Rooij, N. 1915. The reptiles of the Indo- Australian
Archipelago. Vol. I. Lacertilia, Chelonia,
Emydosauria. E. J. Brill, Leiden. 384 pp.
Greer, A. E. 1970. The relationships of the skinks
referred to the genus Dasia. Breviora (348): 1-30.
Leviton, A. E., S. C. Anderson, R. H. Gibbs, E. Heal,
and C. E. Dawson. 1985. Standards in herpetology
and ichthyology. Part I. Standard symbolic codes
for institutional resource collections in herpetology
and ichthyology. Copeia 1985(3):802-832.
Lloyd, M., R. F. Inger, and F. W. King. 1968. On the
diversity of reptile and amphibian species in a
Bornean rain forest. American Naturalist
1 02(928):497-5 1 5.
van Lidth de Jeude, T. W. V. 1905. Zoological results
of the Dutch scientific expedition to central Borneo.
The reptiles. Part I. Lizards. Notes from Leyden
Museum 25(16): 187-202.
Manthey, U., and W. Grossmann. 1997. Amphibien and
Reptilien Siidostasiens. Natur und Tier Verlag,
Munster. 512 pp.
Shelford, R. 1905. A new lizard and a new frog from
Borneo. Annals & Magazine of Natural Histoiy,
Series 7, 15:208-210.
Asiatic Herpetological Research Vol. 10, pp. 245-246 [
Leptobrachium smithi Matsui, Nabitabhata, and Panha, 1999 (Anura:
Megophryidae), an Addition to the Fauna of Myanmar (Burma)
Indraneil Das1 and Sh yamal Kumar Chanda2
1 Institute of Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300,
Kota Samar ahan, Sarawak, Malaysia; E-mail: idas@ibec.unimas.my
“ Amphibia Section, Zoological Survey of India, Fire-Proof Spirit Building,
27, J. L. Nehru Road, Kolkata 700 019, India
Abstract. - Three specimens of Leptobrachium from the collections of the Zoological Survey of India are identified
as Leptobrachium smithi. These specimens were collected
of Leptobrachium smithi for Myanmar.
Key words. - Anura, Leptobrachium , Myanmar, Burma.
Leptobrachium smithi Matsui et al. (1999) was
described from peninsular Thailand, based on popula-
tions that were formerly referred to L. hasseltii Tschudi,
1838 (see Frost, 1985). This species was recently report-
ed from Chandubi in the Mayeng Hill Reserve Forest
and Garbhanga Reserve Forest, Kamrup District, Assam
State, north-eastern India by Sengupta et al. (2001). We
here report specimens from Myanmar in the collection
of the Zoological Survey of India (ZSI) that are allocat-
ed to L. smithi.
Three specimens of Leptobrachium smithii were
examined: ZSI 10439-40, from "Ahsoon" (unlocated), in
Tenasserim, Myanmar, altitude "2,000 feet", collected
by the Swedish journalist, novelist, poet and ship cap-
tain, Gustaf Arthur Ossian Limborg (1849-1908) in
1 877. Limborg's expedition to what was then Burma was
sponsored by Lord Tweeddale (Kjellgren, 1983) and his
collections are distributed in Sweden and the US). Also
examined was ZSI 11841, from Lampi Island, Mergui,
collected by John Anderson, in 1882 (referred to by
Anderson, 1889, as from "Sullivan Island", an older
name for Lampi, 10° 50' N; 98° 15' E).
The material from Myanmar match the description
of original description of Leptobrachium smithi , in addi-
tion to additional specimens examined from Assam State
(see Sengupta et al., 2001), in showing the following
characteristics: moderate body size (snout-vent length
22.4-43.4 mm; head width 6.6-18.1 mm; n = 3); small
inner metatarsal tubercle; dorsum smooth; and absence
of rows of dermal ridges on dorsal surface of limbs. All
specimens referred to here are discolored, hence other
characters used in separating L. smithi from L. hasseltii ,
such as absence of white spots on sides of body and on
thigh; absence of dark spots on ventrum; and absence of
dark markings on dorsum, that differentiates the north-
Limborg in 1877. These are the first confirmed records
em L. smithi from the southern L. hasseltii , are indis-
cemable.
The known distribution of Leptobrachium smithi is
thus north-eastern India, Myanmar (first country record
on the basis of ZSI specimens reported here) and
Thailand. Matsui et al. (1999) suspected the occurrence
of the species in southern Myanmar, based of the larval
description of L. hassseltii by Annandale (1917:153-
157, as Megalophrys hasseltii ), from the Dawna Hills of
the Tenasserim. We have examined these specimens
(ZSI 16735-43) that carry the following locality "Misty
Hollow, w side of Dawna Hills, L. Burma". Surprisingly,
Annandale, neither in his 1917 monograph, nor in any
other works, have referred to the specimens from Burma
mentioned earlier, although all of these were available to
him (see Sclater, 1892).
Acknowledgments
We thank J. R. B. Alfred, Director, Zoological Survey of
India, Kolkata and Colin J. McCarthy, The Natural
History Museum, London, for permission and facilities
at their respective institutions. Saibal Sengupta, Arya
Vidyapeeth College, made comparative material avail-
able to us, and Erik Ahlander, Swedish Museum of
Natural History, Stockholm, provided details on the life
of Ossian Limborg.
Literature Cited
Anderson, J. 1 889. Report on the mammals, reptiles, and
batrachians, chiefly from the Mergui Archipelago,
collected for the Trustees of the Indian Museum.
Journal of the Linnean Society (Zoology) 21:331-
350.
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, pp. 246
2004
Annandale, N. 1917. Zoological results of a tour in the
Far East. Batrachia. Memoirs of the Asiatic
Society of Bengal 6:119-155; PI. V-VI.
Frost, D. R. (Ed). 1985. Amphibian species of the world.
A taxonomic and geographical reference. Allen
Press, Inc., and Association of Systematics
Collections, Lawrence, (iv) + v + 732 pp.
Kjellgren, L. 1983. En prastson som alskade havets vag.
Om kaptenen och litterataren Ossian Limborg.
Sumlen (Svenskt Visarkiv) 1983:57-74.
Matsui, M., J. Nabhitabhata, and S. Panha. 1999. On
Leptobrachium from Thailand with a description of
a new species (Anura: Pelobatidae). Japanese
Journal of Herpetology 18(1 ): 1 9-29.
Sclater, W. L. 1892. List of the Batrachia in the Indian
Museum. Indian Museum, Calcutta,
viii + 43 pp.
Sengupta, S., N. K. Choudhury, and I. Das. 2001.
Leptobrachium smithi Matsui, Nabhitabhata and
Panha, 1999 (Anura: Megophryidae), a new record
for India. Journal of the Bombay Natural History
Society 98(2):289-291.
Asiatic Herpetological Research Vol. 10, pp. 247-279
Species Diversity and Checklist of the Herpetofauna of Pulau Tioman,
Peninsular Malaysia, With a Preliminary Overview of Habitat Utilization
Jesse L. Grismer1, L. Lee Grismer1, Indraneie Das2, Norsham S. Yaakob3,
Lim Boo Liat4, Tzi Ming Leong5, Timothy M. Youmans1, and Hinrich Kaiser1
* Department of Biolog)’, La Sierra University, Riverside, CA 925 1 5-8247, USA
-Institute of Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak,
94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia
' Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong, 52109 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
4 Taman Negara (PERHILITAN), Km 10 Jalan Cheras, 50664 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
3 Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119260
Abstract. - The environmental diversity of Pulau Tioman, a 48 km2 island off the eastern coast of Peninsular Malaysia,
supports a remarkably diverse herpetofauna (97 species) with 22 frogs, one caecilian, one non-marine turtle, 34
lizards, and 39 snakes. The majority of this herpetofauna (74%) occurs in lowland dipterocarp forests. Fifteen new
island records and eight newly described, or as yet undescribed, species are reported, bringing the number of endem-
ic species to at least 11.
Key words. - Pulau Tioman, Malaysia, herpetofauna, habitat diversity, checklist.
Introduction
Pulau Tioman (Tioman Island) is centrally located on the
Sunda Shelf 38 km off the southeast coast of Peninsular
Malaysia in the South China Sea (Fig. 1). Despite its
small size of approximately 48 km2, it supports a diverse
array of habitats. The island's coastline and low-lying
periphery is dominated by mangrove and coastal vegeta-
tive communities whereas inland areas support lowland
dipterocarp forest on the alluvial foothills and hill dipte-
rocarp forest at upper elevations (Latiff et al. 1999).
Topographically, Pulau Tioman is characterized by steep
mountainous terrain reaching 1,035 m in elevation.
Exposed granitic outcroppings consisting of large boul-
ders define much of the island's rugged interior and its
slopes are cut by several fast-flowing, boulder-strewn
streams. As discussed below, this environmental diver-
sity contributes to the island's remarkable herpetological
diversity with 23 amphibians, one non-marine turtle, 33
lizards, and 39 snakes now confirmed as present on the
island (Table 1). This is in contrast to the relative depau-
perate herpetofauna of the surrounding islands of Tulai
(Grismer et al., 2001b), Aur (Escobar et al., 2002a;
Grismer et al., 2001a), Dayang (Wood et al., 2003),
Pemanggil (Youmans et al., 2002), Sembilan and
Seribuat (Wood et al. in prep), Sibil and Besar (Wood et
al., 2004a,b) and Tinggi (Escobar et al., 2002b).
Prior to Elendrickson (1966a,b), no herpetofaunal
survey had been undertaken on Pulau Tioman and only
Figure 1. Location of Pulau Tioman, West Malaysia, in
the South China Sea.
limited accounts on particular taxa existed (i.e.,
Boulenger, 1912; Smith, 1930; de Haas, 1949).
However, despite the thoroughness of Hendrickson
(1966a,b) and subsequent efforts by Day (1990), Lim
and Lim (1999), Hien et al. (2001), and Grismer et al.
(2002a), the herpetofauna of this small island still
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 248
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Mangrove swamps (0 m)
Coastal vegetation (0-80 m)
Lowland dipterocarp forest (80-300 m)
Hill dipterocarp forest (300-950 m)
Ridge forest (950-1,035 m)
Distribution of vegetation zones on Pulau
Tioman. Modified from Latiff et al. (1999).
remains incompletely known. This is evidenced by the
13 new island records since Grismer et al. (2002a) and
Hien et al. (2001) and eight newly described and unde-
scribed species reported herein. Additionally, there has
been no attempt to establish the distribution or habitat
use of each species on Pulau Tioman. Therefore, the
intent of this paper is to report the results of the latest
herpetofaunal surveys which not only list new additions
to the island but new island localities of species known
to be present. The latter will serve as the basis for a pre-
liminary categorization of habitat use for each species
based on its presence in different vegetation zones.
Figure 3. Mangrove swamp at Kampung Paya.
Vegetation Zones
Vegetation zones generally serve to highlight broad cat-
egorical differences between habitats across sizable geo-
graphic areas. On Pulau Tioman, as elsewhere, these
categorical differences lack well-defined geographic
boundaries (Ashton, 1995) and with the exception of
mangrove communities, each zone transitions smoothly
and continuously into another along an altitudinal tran-
sect. We use five different vegetation zones (Fig. 2),
modified after Latiff et al. (1999), to characterize habi-
tat differences on Pulau Tioman.
Mangroves (0 m; Fig. 3). - Mangrove swamps are dis-
junctly distributed along the island's coastline.
Characteristic plant species include Rhizophora apicula-
ta, Bruguiear gymnorhiza, Excoecaria agallocha , and
Avicennia alba , which in some localities are unusually
tall with large girth, attesting to the old age of the grove.
Coastal vegetation (0-80 m; Fig. 4). - Coastal vegeta-
tion forms a relatively narrow zone between the man-
grove swamps (when present) and the lower reaches of
the lowland dipterocarp forest. It is characterized by
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 249
Fig. 6. Hill dipterocarp forest on Gunung Kajang. Fig. 7. Ridge forest at summit of Gunung Kajang.
2004
Figure 8. Collecting localities on Pulau Tioman. G. = Gunung (mountain); Kg. = Kampung (village); S. - Sungai
(river); Tk. = Telok (bay); U. = Ulu (headwater).
palms, such as Pandcmus dubius, and moderately-sized
trees such as Scaevola taccada , Calophyllum inophyl-
lum, and Vitex trifolia. Dipterocarp trees are noticeably
absent.
Lowland dipterocarp forest (80-300 m; Fig. 5). -
Lowland dipterocarp forest occurs on the alluvial slopes
between coastal vegetation and hill dipterocarp forest
and is usually dominated by large non-dipterocarp trees
such as Arenga pinnata , Caryota mitis, and Nenga
macrocarpa. A few large dipterocarp species such as
Anisoptera curtisii and N eobalanocarpus heimii exist as
emergents.
Hill dipterocarp forest (300-950 m; Fig. 6). - This
zone is situated immediately above and adjacent to the
lowland dipterocarp forest with which it is continuous.
The transition from lowland dipterocarp forest to hill
dipterocarp forest at approximately 300 m is essentially
imperceptible and many plant species common to the
lowland dipterocarp forest occur at lower elevations in
the hill dipterocarp forest, a pattern paralleled by some
species of amphibians and reptiles. To illustrate this we
use the term low hill dipterocarp forest (300-500 m) and
high hill dipterocarp forest (500-950 m). Hill diptero-
carp forest is dominated throughout by large species of
Shorea and Dipterocarpus.
Ridge forest (hill top summits between 950-1035 m;
Fig. 7). - Ridge forest occurs on summits where mosses,
ferns, lichens, and bryophytes predominate. Due to
increased exposure to sun and wind, trees are relatively
short. At this altitude, species such as Garcinia penan-
giana , Licuala tiomanensis , and Scleria sumatrensis
dominate and presumably have adapted to live in the
damp wind-blown environment typical of ridge forests.
Materials and Methods
Our data were collected from various localities (Fig. 8)
on five trips; 12-24 March and 7-16 July, 2001 and 19-
27 March, 13-21 July, and 6-19 August, 2002 unless
indicated otherwise. Individuals sighted but not collect-
ed or photographed are listed but considered to be
unconfirmed records. Collecting was done during the
day by hand and blowpipes and at night by torch light.
During July 2001 and 2002, three pitfall trap arrays with
three 1 5-m drift fence sections at each array were sta-
tioned in lowland dipterocarp forest at 142 m and 241 m
along the Tekek-Juara trail. A third array was estab-
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 251
X
X
X
X
X
x x X X X
XXX
*
a
*****
a
53
CO
a
to
a
X a
a s
<u
a
T3
*3
a
a
aa
a
a
b
a ^
0,0,0^ X
^ cq cq cq a.
to
a
£
a
X
to
a
.X
>
§
-a
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X X
X X
X X
XX X
XXX XX X XX X X X
x XX XX XX
X
X X
X
X
.5b
• ****
■K*
CO
a
a
a
a 3>
a
to
a
a
<u
a
■a
X
to
a
a
b
-a
X
V
a
X X
^3 *>**^
-a a
L) X
a Q
•*»*» X.
a -a
a a
“a "a
-a a,
a a
a a
a a
'*'■** *"-**>*
a a
X X
o
i-
o
CJ
a
*s
a
&
to
a
a a
a 13
a a
.£ ;a -a
a ~S %
a X' 3
^ -a ~a
a 03 &o
~ a a
a ■*-»
rS a a
a* a a
a a a
?* a a
a ^ c
& -I -I
X ’"■3 X
a
a
a
a
a
-a
a
a
a
a
a
-a
•**
b
a
to
a
-a
a a a
a a a
a a a
X X X
a
a
a
.a
X
a
a
a
X
to
a
-*«»
a
* »**
X
js
qj a
S3 .&
T3
a
©
£2
CL
O
u
C3
a
£
to
a
a
a
X
to
a
a
J3
• ****
-a
X
I
a
a
a
a
to
a
■a
~a
•*>*
a
a
a
~a
a
a ~a
XX
aa a
a -a
X x
a.
CO
.Co
*****
-a
x
<u ?
a ^
■o
•— X "o
a
a
a
£
a
to
a
oj a
a 5p
a
a
a <u
o. ^ j= ^ a
o «*> "O
b "c
j= = S
~ ° S3
-= *r ox
a h <
Acanthosaura armata
Vol. 10, p. 252
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
cc
X
X X
Q
I
X
XX X
X XX
X X XX
Q
X
TD
CD
3
C
c
o
O
XX XXX
XXX X X X X
XX XX X
XXX X X X X X
X X
X X
X XXX
X x X X X X
>
V
XX XX
X X x X *
X XXX
X XX x X X X
X X
X
X
X
CD
<3 -2
O a
03 cj
^ a
•3 H
a a
■a -sc
s ^
^-1
X CQ
E
co
OX)
<
03
a
■V*
a
• ***»
a
-03
5
a
a
t>0
a
§■
CD
a a
a a
a a
a v.
Q Q
a
a
-3
is
<3
Ss.
03
a
a
• *»*
"***
a
a
<D
-^4
CD
a
.03
"a
03
a
I ^
a a
V. "•>»
o a,
03 05
a a
a a
<3 <3
5 £
X X
a a
U O
03
a „
*
s? g
£ a
3 r
^ a
a £
a a
a- a
03 03
a a
a o
a a
"a as
a a
a
a
'-44
a
a
-a
a
a
a
a
a
a ^
a s
X -c*c
-aT ^
a a
c
o
o>
u
3
•K4
a
a
:a 3
■a; 25
>: a-
£ §
a “a
^ a
a a
a
<3
a
§P
a
-a
a
§ *
~a
:§ -a
a
a
a
co
’a
c
’3
C/5
a
a
a
a
>
• “*-*
"a
a
a
1-4
03
a
a
£
a
a
•*«*
a
3 „
Q ^
a
■K.
■§
a
a
a *
a .03
c* *■*
•2 $
a sc
03 a
_ rv ^
a c< a
*•*■* **0 "N*
lie
-a a a
.03 03 60
*-* ?>
ci, a, -2
a> c> a?
a a a
■*-* a v
a a (3
«3 ^ o
■8
a
a
03
a
8?
2 £
a |
bo 2
'a
•a ^
a
a
•n»
§-
*
a .
a a.
03 c/3
52 03
a a
-a -a
a
03
a
.sc a
’*«* ^ .-
.a, a, ^0
00^
!C
a
£
a
a
a
-a
vr
a
£
a
a
a
-a
<§■<§■
a j
CO
|0
'5
CO
s-
2
03
a
03
a
■~~4
a
-a
a
a
§
a
a
I
a
a
-*■«»
a
a
03
§
a
a
a
£
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 253
fcl
cd
x
X
a
x\
I
X
X
x x X X X
G
x\
- 3
X
XX X X
XXX X
T3
(D
13
c
X
c
o
o
0)
.Q
.03
X X
X
X X X X XX xxxxxxx X
X
x X X X X
X
X X X X X
X
xxxxxxxxxxx
X
X
X X
X
XXX X
X
<u
a
-o
C8
-Q
*
CO
to
a
a
a
<3
to
a
a
-C)
Q 2
CO
Si,
a
• >»»«*
•a
a
to
a
a
QJ
C8
■a
a
a
-a
Co Co
Ci, Cl,
-a
^a a:
Ci, Ci,
o a
-a
a, a,
S |
a a
oa q<
to
a
a
.a
a
V.
a
o
a
a
£ a
a -g
a, o
N
a
'I
co
a-
a
a
,a
as
’a
* .Si
a ^
a
bo
a
CL
o
<L>
a
2
*3
o
JS
>-»
a.
CJ
cs
'u,
-Q
O
U
I ^
a a
g be
-a a a
^ CQ CQ
a a
be -r*
'-«* *<.
a a
a a a
be a a
a « a
cq O U
a
§ a
S a<
'a -a
h a
§ s:
S' b
a sq
5 a
•S •£
a a
<J O
Co
a .co
a g
S I
"* a
a
a
a
&
a
•2 S
a o
^ Co Co
a -g ^
Cy ^ ^
^ a a
£ -a -a
O a a
-a a a
U Q Q
CO
a
co
a
_ .a
.a v
a ^
a, co
Co Co
•*** ^
~a
a, a,
^ -2
a a
.a -£>
as as
a a
a a
Q Q
Co
a
a a
a a
5 £
~g a
S ~S2
co a
CO
a
s ^
a -a a
a a, .$•
£ §. a,
b b-S
Q Q
a
a ^
1 ^
a a
a a
a
3 a?
-a ^
-a a
kj kj
? a
-a
"S p
a a
5 ?
a
a, -->
co a
• > — i ■ ~~-
a
5 £
*
a
3
a
a
at;
a
_a
~a
co
a
a
a. a
$T ka
a
c> ^
§ a
cs .g
5 -«
a p,
§ g
6 5
§ EP
a
CO
a
a
OO^kO
Co
a
a
a
§
5*.
a
b
a
s ^
2 §
a ~a
a a
^ .&o
a a;
a
a
■ — .
a
a
ft. .a
a
a
-a
a
a
a
-a
a
,§D
a
a
Co
a
a
-a q
O Ck
Co
a
a
a
a
a
a
>
a
ck
to
a
a
a
a
a
Co
Vol. 10, p. 254
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
U,
&
a
x
x
X X
Q
X
-a
3
_C
’•»— >
c
o
U
X
X X
X
X X
X
X
>
u
XXX
X
X
X
3
o
s?
&
3
l>3
-3
"3
-3
&
3
o
3
,3
~3
CD
«
T3
-Q
3
"o
u
3
3 -
> -3
3 §-
£ •§
a -3
5 3
O -3
3,
-3
§■
3
~3‘
•■st
CO
4>
3
■a
"S.
_2
2
CO 3
3, .c
Sr 3:
3
'3 3
§ c
>) -3
3 -3
k 3,
txo 3*
Sf =5
3 3
oq Cj
-3
3
3
3
3
•3
co
3
I
-3
§•
* ^
■3
O'
S3
33
U
0 J
Cl.
Q.
CO
Co
3
V
3
co
3
CO
.3
<u
a
2: C/3
3 “
3 <u
E
ts
a
o
(j
Co
~3
3
s*.
3
3 _
3 3;
^ os
§■
5n
3
3
3
3
&
3
co
3
~3 ’3^
o ^
lished on the beach near boulders in coastal vegetation 1
km south of Kampung Tekek. Collecting site elevations
were estimated with the aid of a hand-held global posi-
tioning satellite unit. Distribution data for species not
addressed in the accounts below but listed in Table 1
were taken from Lim and Lim (1999).
Representatives of all species collected were pho-
tographed, tissued for liver, preserved, and deposited in
the Department of Wildlife (PERHILITAN; JAM cat.
nos.), Kulala Lumpur, Malaysia; Forest Research
Institute of Malaysia (FRIM), Kulala Lumpur, Malaysia;
the Zoological Reference Collection (ZRC) of the
Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research at the
National University of Singapore; and the La Sierra
University Herpetological Collection (LSUHC),
Riverside, California, USA. Material from
Hendrickson's (1966a,b) collection deposited in the
Bishop Museum (BPBM), Honolulu, Hawai’i and Day's
(1990) collection (uncatalogued in the British Museum
of Natural History, London) was also examined. All tis-
sues have been deposited at La Sierra University.
Photographs are catalogued in the La Sierra University
Photographic Collection (LSUPC) in the herpetology
laboratory of L. Lee Grismer. The taxonomy of ranid
genera follows Inger and Voris (2001).
Annotated Checklist
Amphibia
Order: Anura
Family: Megophryidae
Leptolalax kajangensis Grismer, Grismer, and
Youmans, 2004
(Fig. 9)
Localities. - Larvae collected from 400 m on
Gunung Kajang were reported by Lim and Lim (1999).
Day (1990) reported larvae from a pool at Gua Tengkuk
Air at 845 m. On 19 March 2001, we collected two
adults (ZRC 1.7714-15) from Gua Tengkuk Air sitting
on boulders approximately 2 m from the water 10 m
below the surface of the cave floor. On 23 March, 2001,
a specimen (LSUHC 4431) was collected from a cave at
the summit of Gunung Kajang at 1035 m. On 10 August,
2002 and adult female (LSUPC-F1497) was observed at
210m elevation along the Tekek-Juara trail. This species
occurs from lowland dipterocarp to ridge forests. This
species was originally known only from tadpoles and
was reported as Leptobrachium sp. (Day, 1990) and
Leptolalax gracilis (Lim and Lim, 1999). Examination
of the adults indicated they belonged to the new species
Leptolalax kajangensis (Grismer et al., 2004).
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 255
Family: Bufonidae
Ansonia tiomanica Hendrickson, 1966
(Fig. 10)
Localities. - Gua Sinah at Ulu Lalang (800 m;
Hendrickson, 1966b).
New localities. - On 3 November, 2000, a specimen
(LSUPC-F439-45) was photographed sitting on the ver-
tical surface of a rock near the top of the Tekek-Juara
trail at 220 m. On 19-21 March, 2001, we observed
approximately 10 specimens in Gua Tengkuk Air at 845
m on Gunung Kajang. All were climbing on large boul-
ders both in and outside of the cave. This species ranges
from lowland dipterocarp to high hill dipterocarp forest
in association with boulders in the vicinity of water.
Bufo asper Gravenhorst, 1829
Localities. - Sungai Nipah (80-200 m; Day, 1990).
New localities. - On 21 March 2001, we observed a
specimen (LSUPC-F380-81) along the Sungai
Mentawak (ca. 195 m) along the water's edge on a
downward sloping face of a boulder. On 23 March,
2002, we observed 11 specimens during the day and
night sitting on rocks at the edge of and within the
Sungai Mentawak of which three (LSUHC 4443, 4447-
48) were collected. This species occurs in coastal vege-
tation and lowland dipterocarp forest.
Bufo melanostictus Schneider, 1799
Localities. - Kampung Tekek (Lim and Lim, 1999).
New localities. - On 7 July, 2001, we collected
specimens from Kampung Mukut (ca. 10 m) and on 9
July additional specimens (LSUHC 3754; ZRC 1.8248-
49) were collected from the beginning of the Tekek-
Juara trail (ca. 80 m) on the forest floor. On 9 July,
2001, a specimen (LSUHC 3814) was collected beneath
a board at Kampung Paya (ca. 15 m). This species
ranges from coastal vegetation to lowland dipterocarp
forest.
Bufo parvus Boulenger, 1877
Localities. - Sungai Paya; Kampung Juara; and
Sungai Keliling (Lim and Lim, 1999).
New localities. - Two specimens (JAM 1860-61)
from Kampung Tekek were collected on 6 November,
1997. Additional specimens (LSUHC 3969-71, 3976-
77, 3981; ZRC 1.8269) were collected on 11-17 July
2001 from the Tekek-Juara trail pitfall traps (142 m) and
from Telok Dungun (ca. 25 m; ZRC 1.826j) on 12 July,
2001. This species ranges from coastal vegetation to
lowland dipterocarp forest.
Family: Microhylidae
Chaperina fusca Mocquard, 1 892
Localities. - Sungai Air Besar; Teluk Penut; and
between Kampung Tekek and Kampung Lalang (Denzer
et al., 1989: 27).
New localities. - On 10 July, 2001, a specimen
(LSUHC 3833) was collected from Telok Nipah (ca. 20
m) under a flat rock at the edge of a narrow stream. At
Telok Penut, tadpoles were also collected from deep
holes in rocks located along the shore of a dried-up
stream bed on 9 July, 2001 and were observed along the
Tekek-Juara Trail in root holes, tree cavities, and pitfall
traps from 200-245 m elevation. On 7 July, 2002 adults
(LSUHC 4667-71) and tadpoles were found in water
catchments within fallen palm fronds along the Sungai
Mentawak at 195 m. This species ranges from coastal
vegetation to low hill dipterocarp forest.
Kalophrynus pleurostigma Tschudi, 1838
(Fig. 11)
Localities. - Gunung Kajang trail at 245 m in eleva-
tion (Escobar et ah, 2003).
New localities. - On 17 July, 2002, a specimen
(LSUHC 4682) was collected at 200 m elevation along
the Tekek-Juara trail. On 9 August, 2002, a specimen
(LSUHC 5024) was collected at night on Gunung
Kajang at 813 m as it was ascending the vertical surface
of a small rock. This species ranges from lowland
dipterpcarp to high hill dipterocarp forests.
Family: Ranidae
Fejervarya cancrivora Gravenhorst, 1829
Localities. - Kampung Lalang and Kampung Tekek
(Hendrickson, 1966b).
New localities. - On 12 July, 2001, a specimen was
collected at Telok Dalam (ca. 10 m) and released. The
individual was sitting approximately 1 m from the edge
of the water. When approached another specimen
jumped into the water and buried itself in leaf liter at the
bottom of the stream. This species occurs in mangroves
and coastal vegetation.
Limnonectes blythii Boulenger, 1920
Localities. - Sedagong; Sungai Air Raja at
Kampung Genting; Sungai Durian Kallang at Kampung
Paya; Sungai Besar waterfall along Tekek-Juara trail;
Sungai Pasal; Sungai Keliling; Sungai Paya; Sungai
Vol. 10, p. 256
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Baharu; and Tekek-Juara trail (Lim and Lim, 1999).
New localities. - We add an additional specimen
(LSUHC 3832) from Sungai Raya (ca. 100 m) collected
on 10 July, 2001 and from the Sungai Mentawak
(LSUHC 4642; 195 m) collected on 19 July, 2002. Both
specimens were sitting near the water's edge on a large
rock at night. Additonal speciemens (LSUHC 4646-47)
were collected from a small stream at the back of Telok
Monkey (ca. 3 m) on 19 July, 2002. This species occurs
in coastal vegetation and lowland dipterocarp forest.
Limnonectes hascheanus Stoliczka, 1870
Localities. - Sungai Paya (Leong, 2000); Tekek-
Juara Trail, Ulu Lalang (Hendrickson, 1966b).
New localities. - On 1 1 July, 2001, three specimens
(LSUHC 3856, 3864, 3868) were collected from the
Sungai Besar waterfall on the Tekek-Juara trail (220 m)
while sitting near the base of the waterfall on a rocky
slope. On 13 July, 2001, a specimen of L. hascheanus
was observed but not collected at Telok Dalam. On 12
July, 2001 a specimen (LSUHC 3887) was collected
from Sungai Dungun (ca.10 m). Hendrickson (1966b)
reported two specimens of this species as "Rana
(Discodeles/Platymantis) sp." Upon examination of his
material (BPBM 14200-2001) we find them to be L.
hascheanus. This species occurs in lowland dipterocarp
forest.
Rana chalconota Schlegel, 1837-1844
Localities. - Tekek-Juara trail; Kampung Tekek;
Sungai Keliling; Sungai Mentawak; and Sedagong (Lim
and Lim, 1999).
New localities. - On 21 March, 2001, a juvenile
(LSUPC-F285) was observed sitting on a leaf approxi-
mately 0.5 m above the ground behind a house in
Kampung Juara (5 m). On 9 July 2001, three specimens
(LSUHC 3803-05; ZRC 1.8255) were collected from
Sungai Nipah (10 m). All were found inside large boul-
der caves situated within the stream. On 12 July, 2001,
three specimens (LSUHC 3886, 3909-10) were collect-
ed from Telok Dungun (15 m). This species ranges from
coastal vegetation to low hill dipterocarp forest.
Rana erythraea Schlegel, 1837-1844
Localities. - Kampung Tekek (Hendrickson,
1966b).
New localities - On 9 July, 2001, a specimen
(LSUHC 3815) was collected at sea level from
Kampung Paya from along a large pond just behind the
beach. On 21 March, 2002, one specimen was found
during the day sitting on the branch of a mangrove tree
I m above the water at Air Batang (ca. 5 m). This
species occurs in mangrove and coastal vegetation.
Rana hosii Boulenger, 1891
Localities. - Tekek-Juara trail; Kampung Paya;
Sungai Kalang; and Sungai Ayer Besar waterfall on the
Tekek-Juara trail (Lim and Lim, 1999).
New localities. - On 13 July, 2001, a specimen was
observed along Sungai Dungun, but not collected. On
II July, 2001, a specimen (LSUHC 3819) was collected
along Sungai Raya (ca. 50 m). On the evening of 19
July, 2002, three specimens (LSUHC 4625-26) were
collected along the Sungai Mentawak at 195 m in eleva-
tion while sitting on vegetation. This species occurs in
lowland dipterocarp and low hill dipterocarp forest.
Rana picturata Boulenger, 1920
(Fig. 12)
Localities. - Tributary of Sungai Mentawak (Day,
1990).
New localities. - Day (1990) reported a specimen
Rana signata from a tributary of the Sungai Mentawak
at 300 m. We have examined that specimen (uncata-
logued in the British Museum of Natural History) and
find it to be R. picturata. We report additional speci-
mens of R. picturata from the Sungai Mentawak at 1 95
m collected on 24 March, 2002 (LSUHC 4435-41) and
19 July, 2002 (LSUHC 4636-40). All were found
perched on rocks or vegetation along the water's edge
during the evening. This species is found in coastal and
lowland dipterocarp forest.
Family: Rhacophoridae
Nyctixalus pictus Peters, 1871
(Fig. 13)
Localities. - A single specimen (ZRC 1.8268) was
collected from the Tekek-Juara trail (ca. 240 m) on the
night of 16 July, 2001 (Leong and Crane, 2002). It dif-
fers from other populations of N. pictus in that its body
and limbs are yellow in coloration instead of orange or
brownish. Another specimen was heard calling on 14
July, 2001 along a small stream on the Tekek-Juara trail
(ca. 100 m) by LBL and NSY. This specimen constitutes
a new record for Pulau Tioman. This species occurs in
lowland dipterocarp forest.
Polypedates leucomystax Boie, 1 829
Localities. - Kampung Tekek and Kampung Juara
(Lim and Lim, 1999).
2004
Asiatic Hcrpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 257
New localities. - On 7 July, 2001, a specimen
(LSUHC j770) was collected on the Tekek-Juara trail
(241 m) while sitting on a leaf approximately 1 m above
the ground. On 1 1 July, 2001, a specimen was observed
in the Sungai Dungun (ca. 10 m) but not collected. This
species ranges from coastal vegetation to low hill dipte-
rocarp forest.
Theloderma horridum Boulenger, 1903
(Fig. 14)
Localities. - On the evening of 22 March, 2002, one
specimen ot Theloderma horridum was found on the
side ot a large tree (ca. 1 m in diameter) near the Tekek-
Juara trail at 245 m in elevation (Grismer et al. 2003a).
On 14 July, 2002, another specimen was found on the
Tekek-Juara trail at 140 m elevation. This species is
found in lowland dipterocarp forest.
Reptilia
Order: Squamata
Family: Agamidae
Acanthosaura armata Ftardwicke and Gray, 1827
Localities. - Tekek-Juara trail (Hendrickson,
1966b).
New localities. - On 13 July, 2001, a specimen
(LSUHC 3873) was collected in primary forest south of
Kampung Salang (ca.80 m). On 18 March, 2001 two
specimens were observed at Gua Tengkuk Air on
Gunung Kajang at 845 m. One was photographed
(LSUPC-L7070-71). The latter specimens had patterns
that were considerably darker than those of specimens
from lowland forests which appears to be a function of
substrate matching. On 17 July, 2002, two specimens
were collected at Telok Monkey (ca. 40 m). One
(LSUHC 4598) was 1 m above ground level on a small
(ca. 10 cm in diameter) tree facing head-up. The other
(LSUHC 4599) was observed sitting on a hollow log
that was lying on the forest floor. When approached, it
ran into the hollow of the log in an attempt to escape.
This species ranges from coastal vegetation to high hill
dipterocarp forest.
Aphcmiotis fusca Peters, 1 864
Localities. - Sedagong; Tekek-Juara trail; Kampung
Asah (Lim and Lim, 1999).
New localities. - On 18 March, 2001, an individual
was photographed (LSUPC-L593 1-36) and released on
Gunung Kajang at 320 m in elevation. On 12 July, 2001,
a male and female (LSUHC 3897; ZRC 2.5147) were
collected from Telok Dalam off the same tree, facing
head up approximately 1 .5 m above the ground at 20 m.
On 9 July, 200 1 , a sighting was made at Sungai Benuang
at 15 m. On 9 July, 2001, an individual (LSUHC 3818)
was collected from a tree in Kampung Mukut and anoth-
er (ZRC 2.5131) from a sapling approximately 0.5 m
above the ground at Telok Nipah at 20 m. This species
ranges from lowland dipterocarp to low hill dipterocarp
forest.
Bronchocela cristatella Kuhl, 1820
Localities. - Tekek-Juara trail near Kampung Juara;
Kampung Juara; Kampung Tekek; and Kampung Mukut
(Lim an Lim, 1 999).
New localities. - On 19 July, 2000, a specimen was
photographed (LSUPC-L762) at Kampung Air Batang at
15 m. On 13 July, 2001, a specimen was observed from
primary forest in Telok Dalam at 15 m. On 18 July,
2002, one specimen (LSUHC 4613) was observed on a
tree in coastal forest at Telok Monkey (ca. 20 m). On 1 1
August, 2002, a specimen (LSUHC 5046) was collected
from 15 m above ground level on a branch at the base of
Gunung Kajang at 291 m in elevation. This species
occurs from coastal vegetation to low hill dipterocarp
forest.
Draco fimbriatus Kuhl, 1820
(Fig. 15)
Localities. - On 8 July, 2001, a specimen (ZRC
2.5130) was collected from a large dipterocarp tree
approximately 6 m above the ground at 160 m on the
Tekek-Juara trail. On 9 July, 2001, a second specimen
(LSUHC 3823) was collected approximately 4 m above
the ground at 142 m on the same trail. On 1 7 July, 2002.
a male and female were observed 20 m above ground
level on the side of a tree in coastal vegetation at Telok
Monkey (ca. 20 m). The male (LSUHC 4601) was col-
lected. These specimens constitute new island records.
This species occurs in coastal vegetation and lowland
dipterocarp forest.
Draco haematopogon Boie, 1831
(Fig. 16)
Localities. - On 20 March. 2001, an adult male
(SVL 106 mm) and female (SVL 100 mm) were collect-
ed, photographed (LSUPC-L7072-78), and released
from near Gua Tengkuk Air on Gunung Kajang at 845
m. The male had a yellow dewlap with a black spot at
base surrounded by orange and the female had an
orangish dewlap with a yellow fringe. Both were found
on a large dipterocarp tree facing head up approximate-
Vol. 10, p. 258
Asiatic Herpetologica/ Research
2004
Fig. 9. Leptolalax kajangensis from Gua Tengkuk Air, Gunung Kajang.
Fig. 10. Ansonia tiomanica from Tekek-Juara trail.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 259
Fig. 1 1 . Kalophrynus pleurostigma from the Tekek-Juara trail.
Fig. 12. Rana picturata from the Sungai Mentawak.
Vol. 10, p. 260
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Fig. 13. Nyctixalus pictus from the Tekek-Juara trail.
Fig. 14. Theloderma horridum from the Tekek-Juara trail.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 26)
Fig. 1 5. Draco fimbriatus from the Tekek-Juara trail.
Vol. 10, p. 262
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Fig. 1 8. Crytodactylus tiomanensis from the Tekek-Juara trail.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 263
Fig. 19. Lipinia vittigera from Salang.
Fig. 20. Sphenomorphus sp. from the summit of Gunung Kajang.
Vo!. 10, p. 264
2004
Fig. 22. Calamaria ingeri from the Tekek-Juara trail.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 265
Fig. 23. Chrysopelea pelias from the Tekek-Juara trail.
Fig. 24. Dendrelaphis striatus from Teluk Monkey.
Vol. 10, p. 266
2004
Fig. 25. Fordonia leucobalia from Kampung Tekek.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 267
Fig. 27. Gonyosoma oxycephalumUom Kampung Juara. Photo by Pauli Hien.
Fig. 28. Oligodon purpurescens from the Gunung Kajang trail.
• ■
Vol. 10, p. 268
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Fig. 29. Rhabdophis chrysargos from the Tekek-Juara trail.
Fig. 30. Sibynophis melanocephalus from Kampung Juara.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 269
Figure 31. Trimeresurus sp. (male) from Tekek-Juara trail.
ly 6 m above the ground. These specimens constitute a
new island record. This species occurs in high hill dipte-
rocarp forest.
Draco melanopogon Boulenger, 1887
Localities. -Tekek-Juara trail; Sedagong; Kampung
Asah; Kampung Paya; and Gunung Kajang at 800 m
(Lim an Lim, 1999).
New localities. - On 9 and 1 1 March, 2001, respec-
tively, a specimen (LSUHC 3809) was colleted from
Telok Nipah (10 m) and Sungai Nipah (LSUHC 3869) at
20 m. Day (1990) reported an unidentified species of
Draco at Telok Nipah based on his sighting of two indi-
viduals with pinkish dewlaps displaying at one another.
We observed individuals with pinkish dewlaps at Telok
Nipah and elsewhere to be female D. melanopogon. On
13 July, 2001, a specimen (LSUHC 3908) was collected
at Telok Dalam in primary forest at 20 m. On 12 July,
2001, several specimens were observed at Telok Dungun
at 10-35 m. On 13 July, 2001, a specimen (LSUHC
3903) was collected at Kampung Salang at 10-15 m.
Two specimens (LSUHC 3798. 3809) were collected
from Sungai Benuang (10 m) and one (LSUHC 3822)
from Sungai Raya on 9 July, 2001 at 40 m. One speci-
men (LSUHC 502 1 ) was collected on Gunung Kajang at
813 m on 8 August, 2002. This species ranges from
coastal vegetation to high hill dipterocarp.
Draco sum atr anus Schlegel, 1844
Localities. - Kampung Tekek; Sungai Mukut at
Kampung Mukut; and Kampung Air Batang (Lim and
Lim, 1999).
New localities. - On 9 March. 2001. a male with a
blue head was collected from Sungai Nipah at approxi-
mately 20 m. On 8 July, 200 1 , two specimens (LSUHC
3777; ZRC 2.5121) were collected from the Tekek-Juara
trail in lowland forest at 80-150 m. On 12 July, 2001 an
individual (LSUHC 3899) from Telok Dalam was found
during mid-day in the mangroves approximately 3 m
above ground. On 13 July, 2001, a specimen (LSUPC-
L3 103-04) was photographed at Telok Dungun at an ele-
vation of 15 m. On 13 July, 2001, an individual was
observed in coastal vegetation at Kampung Salang at
approximately 10 m in elevation. All lizards were found
facing head-up on trees. This species ranges from man-
grove to lowland dipterocarp forest.
Vol. 10, p. 270
2004
Gonocephalus chamaeleontinus Laurenti, 1768
Localities. - Tekek-Juara trail, Kampung Paya
along the trail to Gunung Kajang (Lim and Lim, 1999).
New localities. - On 9 July, 2001 an individual was
observed on Sungai Benuang at 15 m. On 10 July, 200 1 ,
a specimen (LSUHC 3881) was found at Telok Dungun
in primary forest at 20 m. On 13 July, 2001, a specimen
was observed from Kampung Salang in primary forest at
10 m. On 19 July, 2002, two specimens (LSUHC 4623-
24) were observed at night sleeping on vegetation ca. 5
m above ground level along the Sungai Mentawak at
195 m. On 10 August, 2002, a specimen was observed
on a small tree at Gua Tengkuk Air on Gunung Kajang
at 845 m. All were found 2-5 m above the ground on the
side of trees facing head-up. This species occurs from
lowland dipterocarp to high hill dipterocarp forest.
Gonocephalus grandis Gray, 1 845
Localities. - Sungai Asah; Sungai Nipah;
Sedagong; and Sungai Air Besar (Lim and Lim, 1999).
New localities. - On 1 1 July, 2001, a male and a
juvenile were sighted on trees along the Sungai Raya but
not collected. On 15 July, 2001, a adult male was col-
lected from a trail behind and leading out of Kampung
Tekek. On 19 July, 2002, four specimens (LSUHC
46 1 9-22) were observed on trees near the edge of Sungai
Mentawak at 195 m. Additional specimens were
observed on trees along a small stream at 291 m at the
base of Gunung Kajang. This species ranges through
lowland dipterocarp to low hill dipterocarp forests pri-
marily in association with streams.
Family Gekkonidae
Cnemaspis kendallii Gray, 1 845
Localities. - Tekek-Juara trail (Lim and Lim, 1 999).
New localities. - On 18 March, 2001, individuals
were observed at the base of Gunung Kajang and along
the Sungai Mentawak (80-200 m). Additional speci-
mens (LSUHC 3797) were collected at Sungai Benuang
(9 July, 2001; LSUHC 3797; ca. 20 m), Kampung Paya
(9 July, 200 1 ; LSUHC 38 1 1 ; ca. 15 m), Sungai Raya ( 1 1
July, 2001; LSUHC 3820; ca. 12 m), Kampung Salang
(12 July, 2001; LSUHC 3878; ca. 10 m), and Telok
Dalam (12 July, 2001; observed only). Additional spec-
imens were found at Mukut (15 July, 2002; LSUHC
4566; ca. 50 m) and Telok Monkey (18 and 29 July,
2002; ca. 35 m; LSUHC 4615 and 4666, respectively).
All were found on rocks or trees during both day and
night. This species ranges from coastal vegetation to
low hill dipterocarp forest.
Cnemaspis limi Das and Grismer, 2003
(Fig. 17)
Localities. - Tekek-Juara trail; Gunung Rokam;
Gunung Kajang at 950 m (Lim and Lim, 1999).
New localities. - On 19 March, 2001, specimens
(LSUPC-L3662-65) were photographed at Gua Tengkuk
Air on Gunung Kajang at 845 m and from the summit at
1035 m. On 10 July, 2001, three specimens (LSUHC
3888, 3902; ZRC 2.5 149) were collected in primary for-
est at Kampung Salang at 20 m. On 1 1 July, 2001, a
specimen was observed at Telok Dungun at 100 m. On
9 July, 2001, a specimen was observed at the Sungai
Raya at 25 m. On 17 and 18 July, 2002, two specimens
(LSUHC 4596, 4616) were collected off rocks at Telok
Monkey (ca. 20 m). On 19 July, 2002, one specimen
(LSUHC 4629) was collected from the Sungai
Mentawak at 195 m. The Pulau Tioman population was
originally reported as C. nigridia (Hendrickson, 1966a)
but was described as a new species (Das and Grismer,
2003) All specimens were observed on steep faces of
large boulders in shaded areas or within deep rock
crevices. This species occurs from coastal vegetation to
ridge forest.
Cosymbotus craspedotus Mocquard, 1 890
Localities. - On 9 November, 1997, a single speci-
men (JAM 1834) was collected from the palm groves in
Kampung Tekek at the base of the Tekek-Juara trail at 50
m while facing head down approximately 3 m above the
ground. This constitutes a new island record. This
species occurs in coastal vegetation.
Cosymbotus pi atyurus Schneider, 1792
Localities. - Kampung Tekek (Grismer et al.,
2002a).
New localities. - On 13 July, 2001, a juvenile (ZRC
2.5146) was collected in a restaurant on the beach at
Kampung Salang. This species occurs in coastal vege-
tation.
Cyrtodactylus quadrivirgatus Taylor, 1962
Localities. - No locality data provided (Manthey
and Grossmann, 1997:228).
New localities. - On 2 November, 2000, a specimen
was observed and photographed (LSUPC-L33 13) while
sitting on a leaf approximately 1 .5 m above the ground
along the Tekek-Juara trail at 190 m. On 19 2001 March,
a single specimen was observed at Gua Tengkuk Air on
Gunung Kajang at 845 m. One specimen (LSUHC 5622)
was collected off vegetation along the Sungai Mentawak
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 271
at 195 m on 7 August, 2002. This species ranges from
lowland dipterocarp to high hill dipterocarp forest.
Cyrtodactylus tiomanensis Das and Lim, 2000
(Fig. 18)
Localities. - Tekek-Juara trail; Gunung Kajang at
400 m and 750 m (Lim and Lim, 1999).
New localities. - On 12 March, 2001, several spec-
imens were observed on large boulders within and
around Gua Tengkuk Air on Gunung Kajang at 845 m.
On 20-22 March, 2001, several specimens were
observed (LSUPC-L7002-09) on boulders, trees, and
leaf-litter at the forest's edge on the beach 1 km south of
Kampung Tekek. One specimen (LSUHC 4597) was
collected from Telok Monkey (ca. 20 m) on 17 July,
2002. This species ranges from coastal vegetation to
high hill dipterocarp forest.
Gehyra mutilata Wiegmann, 1834
Localities. - Kampung Tekek and Kampung Mukut
(Hendrickson, 1966a).
New localities. - On 16 March, 2001, a specimen
(LSUPC-L6080-84) was photographed during the
evening on the Tekek-Juara trail at approximately 200
m. This species occurs in lowland dipterocarp forest and
in disturbed habitat.
Gekko monarchus Dumeril and Bibron, 1836
Localities. -Sungai Keliling (Hendrickson, 1966a).
New localities. - On 22 March, 2001, specimens
(LSUPC-L7044-45) were photographed from the Tekek-
Juara trail, on boulders, trees or short vegetation from
50-100 m. On 23 March, 2001, specimens (LSUPC-
L7046-49) were photographed on rocks from the boul-
der caves on the beach 1 km south of Kampung Tekek.
This species occurs in coastal vegetation and lowland
dipterocarp forest.
Hemidactylus frenatus Dumeril and Bibron, 1836
Localities. - Kampung Tekek (Hendrickson,
1966a).
New localities. - On 9 July, 2001, two specimens
(LSUHC 3807-08) were collected at Telok Nipah at 5 m
beneath the wood of an abandoned shack. On 22 March,
2001, a specimen was collected and released at
Kampung Juara. This species occurs in coastal vegeta-
tion usually near human habitations.
Ptychozoon kuhli Stejneger, 1902
Localities. - On 16 March, 2001, a specimen
(LSUPC-L70 10-26) was photographed along the Tekek-
Juara trail approximately 3 m above the ground on a
large strangler fig at approximately 200 m. On 18 March
2001, an individual was found on the Tekek-Juara trail
facing head down on a large dipterocarp tree approxi-
mately 6 m above the ground at 250 m. On 10 July,
2001, a single specimen (LSUHC 3835) was found on
the Tekek-Juara trail on a large metal pole approximate-
ly 3 m above the ground at 142 m. On 16 July, 2001, a
specimen was sighted in a coconut palm grove in
Kampung Tekek at the base of the Tekek-Juara trail at 80
m. One specimen (LSUHC 5042) was collected from 20
m above ground level on the side of a tree along the
Sungai Mentawak at 195 m on 11 August, 2002. These
specimens confirm this species' presence on Pulau
Tioman, first reported as an unconfirmed sighting by
Grismer et al. (2002a). This species ranges from coastal
vegetation to lowland dipterocarp forest.
Family: Scincidae
Dasia olivacea Gray, 1 839
Localities. - Kampung Tekek; Kampung Paya;
Sungai Asah (Hendrickson, 1966a).
New localities. - On 16 March, 2001, a specimen
was observed on the Tekek-Juara trail at 200 m in eleva-
tion in primary forest. Another was seen on a large
dipterocarp tree approximately 2.5 m above the ground
at 80 m. On 10 July, 2001, an individual (LSUHC 3863)
was collected from Kampung Mukut at 5 m. On 12 July,
2001, a sighting of a D. olivacea was recorded at
Kampung Salang at 10 m. This species occurs from
coastal vegetation to low hill dipterocarp forest.
Emoia atrocostata Lesson, 1830
Localities. - On 11 July, 2001, an individual was
sighted at Kampung Salang at 10 m on a wooden bridge
near the coast. On the same day a specimen was collect-
ed from intertidal rocks on neighboring Pulau Tulai
(Grismer et al., 2001b). This species occurs in the man-
groves and along rocky shorelines (see Hendrickson,
1966a) but remains unconfirmed for Pulau Tioman.
Eutropis multifasciata Kuhl, 1820
Localities. - Sedagong; Sungai Pasal; Tekek-Juara
trail; and Kampung Paya (Lim and Lim, 1999).
New localities. - On 11 July, 2001, several speci-
mens were sighted at Telok Dungun and Telok Dalam
(10-35 m). On 12 July, 2001, specimens were observed
Vol. 10, p. 272
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
from Kampung Salang (10 m) and from rock cracks in
the waterfall in the Sungai Raya at 80 m. One individ-
ual observed at the waterfall jumped off a rocky face
into the water approximately 2 m below to escape.
Many other specimens were observed along the Sungai
Mentawak on 19-22 July, 2002. Juveniles were found
on rocks within the stream and would jump into the
water to escape. Some would dive below the surface
and cling to the edge of rocks for several minutes. Many
others were observed along the Gunung Kajang trail
from 195-245 m in elevation. This species ranges from
coastal vegetation to low hill dipterocarp forest.
Larutia seribuatensis Grismer, Leong, and Yaakob,
2003
Localities. - On 20 August, 2002, an individual
(LSUPC-L182) was observed abroad on the forest floor
in high hill dipterocarp forest at ca. 400 m immediately
following a rain shower. This species is also known
from coastal vegetation on Pulau Tulai (Grismer et al.,
2003). This species ranges from coastal vegetation to
high hill dipterocarp forest. It is currently being
described as a new species endemic to Pulau Tulai and
Pula Tioman (Grismer et ah, 2003).
Lipinia vittigera Boulenger, 1 894
(Fig. 19)
Localities. - Unconfirmed sighting at Kampung
Asah (Lim and Lim, 1999).
New localities. - From 10-16 July, 2001, specimens
were sighted at Sungai Raya (40 m), Tekek-Juara trail
(210 m), the base of the Tekek-Juara trail (45 m; a juve-
nile with a bright orange tail), Telok Nipah (25 m), and
Telok Dungun (30 m). One specimen (ZRC 2.5 1 5 1) was
collected in primary forest at Kampung Salang at 40 m.
One specimen was cited on a tree at the base of Gunung
Kajang at 291 m on 24 March, 2002. All were observed
foraging on the sides of large trees 3-5 m above the
ground. A hatchling (LSUHC 4814) was collected in
flotsam and coral at the water's edge in Telok Monkey.
These specimens confirm this species' presence on Pulau
Tioman. This species ranges from coastal vegetation to
low hill dipterocarp forest.
Lygosoma bowringii Gunther, 1 864
Localities. - On 15 March, 2001, a specimen was
collected beneath a trash can in Kampung Tekek, pho-
tographed (LSUPC-L6058-66), and released. On 18
March, 2001, a specimen was observed at Kampung
Juara at 5 m. On 8 July, 2001, a specimen was collect-
ed from the Tekek-Juara trail at 140 m. On 9 July, 200 1 ,
a specimen was sighted in Kampung Paya at sea level.
This species ranges from coastal vegetation to lowland
dipterocarp forest.
Sphenomorphus scotophilus Boulenger, 1900
Localities. - Gunung Kajang at 845 m and the
Tekek-Juara trail (Lim and Lim, 1999).
New localities. - On 19 March, 2001, two speci-
mens (LSUPC-L3286-87) were observed and pho-
tographed from the summit of Gunung Kajang at 1035
m and at Gua Tengkuk Air at 845 m. On 9 July, 2001, a
specimen (LSUHC 3806) was collected at Sungai
Benuang at 20 m. On 9 July, 2001, a specimen (ZRC
2.5135) was collected from the rocks in the Sungai Raya
at 45 m. Several were seen on rocks along the trail south
of Salang on 13 July, 2001. Additional specimens were
collected from Telok Nipah (9 July, 2001; LSUHC
3806), Mukut (9 July, 2001; LSUHC 3821), and Telok
Monkey (17 July, 2001; LSUHC 4595 between 10 m
and 20 m). This species ranges from coastal vegetation
to ridge forest.
Sphenomorphus sp.
(Fig. 20)
New localities. - On 22 March, 2002, a specimen
(LSUHC 4429) of a new species of Sphenomorphus was
collected along the Gunung Kajang Trail at 510 m in ele-
vation. On 8 August, 2002, a hatchling of the same
species (LSUHC 5031) was collected on the summit of
Gunug Kajang at 1035 m. Many other specimens were
observed in the leaf litter of the forest floor between
300-1035 m on Gunung Kajang. This species ranges
from low hill dipterocarp to ridge forest. It is currently
being described (Grismer, in prep.).
Family: Varanidae
Varanus nebulosus Gray 1 83 1
Localities. - Sedagong; Kampung Air Batang;
Kampung Salang; and Kampung Tekek (Lim and Lim,
1999).
New localities. - On 18 March, 2001, several indi-
viduals were observed in Kampung Juara basking on
coconut palms 1-6 m above the ground. On 17 March,
2001, a juvenile and adult were observed along the
Tekek-Juara trail (100 m and 275 m). Varanus nebulo-
sus were also seen at Telok Dalam, Telok Dungun.
Kampung Paya, Kampung Mukut, and Telok Nipah (0-
80 m). This species ranges from coastal vegetation to
lowland dipterocarp forest.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 273
Var anus salvator Laurenti, 1768
Localities. - Sedagong; Kampung Salang;
Kampung Asah; Kampung Tekek (Lim and Lim, 1999).
New localities. - On 9 July, 2001, a sighting of a
Varanus salvator approximately 1.5 m in SVL was made
in Kampung Paya at 5 m. On 16 March a sighting of a
specimen was recorded in Telok Nipah. On 19 March,
2002, two specimens were observed along the banks of
the Sungai Mentawak at 195 m 2 km inland from the
coast. This species occurs in mangroves, coastal vege-
tation, and lowland dipterocarp forest provided there are
waterways serving as dispersal corridors.
Family: Dibamidae
Dibamus tiomanensis Diaz, Leong, Grismer and
Yaakob, 2004
Localities. - Kampung Paya (Lim and Lim, 1999);
Tekek-Juara trail at 80 m (Diaz et al. 2004).
New localities. - Lim and Lim (1999) reported this
population as D. cf. alfredi based on the only known
specimen (ZRC 2.3410). On 14 August, 2002 a speci-
men was found beneath a log at Air Batang at sea level.
This species is found from mangrove to lowland dipte-
rocarp forest.
Family: Typhlopidae
Ramphotyphlops albiceps Boulenger, 1898
(Fig. 21)
Localities. - On 8 July, 2001, a specimen (ZRC
2.5125) was collected from the Tekek-Juara trail, at 241
m in elevation. It was unearthed 0.3 m below the sur-
face of the ground in rocky soil while placing pit fall
traps. This constitutes a new island record. This species
occurs in low hill dipterocarp forest.
Ramphotyphlops braminus Daudin, 1 803
Localities. - Kampung Juara (Day, 1990).
New localities. - On 21 March, 2001, a specimen
(LSUPC-S2814) was found beneath a large piece of
wood in Kampung Tekek (ca. 10 m) and photographed.
On 9 July, 2001, an individual (ZRC 2.5134) was col-
lected at Kampung Paya at 5 m. This species occurs in
mangrove and coastal vegetation.
Family: Pythonidae
Python reticulatus Schneider, 1801
Localities. - Kampung Tekek and north of Telok
Dungun (Hendrickson, 1966a).
New localities. - On 6 August, 2001, K. P. Lim
(pers. comm.) informed LLG of a specimen measuring
approximately 5 m SVL he observed in Kampung Paya
on 17 July, 2001. Several specimens have been
observed by JLG, LLG, and TMY at Air Batang,
Berjaya, Kampung Juara, and Telok Nipah from 0-15 m.
This species ranges from mangrove to lowland diptero-
carp forest.
Family: Colubridae
Ahaetulla prasina Boie, 1 827
Localities. - Tekek-Juara trail at the Sungai Air
Besar crossing (Hendrickson, 1966a).
New localities. - On 20 March, 2001, a specimen
was observed and photographed (LSUPC-S2892-99) at
Gua Tengkuk Air at 845 m. On 13 July, 2001, an adult
specimen (LSUHC 3914) was collected in lowland for-
est at Telok Dungun. Two specimens (LSUHC 4687-88)
were collected from the Tekek waterfall trail at ca. 100
m on 18 July, 2002. This species occurs from coastal
vegetation to high hill dipterocarp forest.
Boiga drapiezii (Boie, 1 827)
Localities. - Tekek-Juara trail at 213 m in eleva-
tion. One specimen (LSUPC-S3797) was collected on
14 July 2003 2 m above the ground as it was crawling
down the side of a palm tree. This species represents a
new record for P. Tioman.
Boiga nigriceps Gunther, 1 863
Localities. - Kampung Juara at 100 m (Hien et al.
2001).
New localities. - On 26 March, 2002, an adult
(LSUHC 4494) was found on the Tekek-Juara trail at
night at ca.175 m as it was crawling across the trail. On
16 July, 2002, and juvenile (LSUHC 4591) was found at
night 2 m above the ground in a small tree at the damn
on the Tekek-Juara trail at 220 m. On 18 July, 2002, an
adult (LSUHC 4686) was found crawling through brush
on the Tekek waterfall trail at 185 m. This species
ranges from coastal vegetation to lowland dipterocarp.
Calamaria ingeri Grismer, Kaiser, and Yaakob, 2004
(Fig. 22)
Localities. - On 22 July, 2002, a specimen of
Calamaria (LSUHC 4716) was found within a trap in
the lower pitfall trap array. On 23 July, 2002, another
specimen (LSUHC 4800) was found in the same trap.
Vol. 10, p. 274
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
These specimens resemble C. lovii gimletti in coloration
but lack the enlarged second supralabial of all C. lovii
and have unique combinations of characters that set
them apart from all other Calamaria (Inger and Marx,
1965). This population was described as C. inger i
(Grismer et al. ,2004a). This species is found in lowland
dipterocarp forest.
Chrysopelea pelias Linnaeus, 1758
(Fig. 23)
Localities. - Kampung Juara (Day, 1990).
New localities. - On 19 March, 2001, a specimen
(LSUPC-S2793-2801) was observed and photographed
on a large dipterocarp approximately 4 m above the
ground on the Tekek-Juara trail at 195 m. We collected
this snake two hours after we had collected a Ptychzoon
kuhli from the same tree. The snake was facing head
down and rapidly tongue flicking the spot where we pre-
viously collected the P. kuhli. We suspect it may have
been scent trailing the gecko. On 1 1 July 2001, a spec-
imen (ZRC 2.5145) was collected from the Tekek-Juara
trail at 140 m crawling across a large boulder. This
species occurs in lowland dipterocarp forest.
Dendrelaphis cyanochloris Wall, 1921
Localities. - Tekek-Juara trail and Kampung Juara
(Hien et al., 2001).
New localities. - On 17 July 2001, one specimen
(LSUHC 4611) was found at night sleeping in brush
along the Tekek waterfall trail at 100 m. This species
occurs in lowland dipterocarp forest.
Dendrelaphis pictus Gmelin, 1789
Localities. - Tekek-Juara trail (Grismer et al.,
2002a).
New localities. - On 6 August 2001, K. P. Lim
(pers. com., 2001) informed LLG of an observation of
D. pictus in Kampung Juara on 21 July 2001. This
species ranges from coastal vegetation to low hill dipte-
rocarp forest.
Dendrelaphis striatus Cohn, 1906
(Fig. 24)
Localities. - Kampung Juara (Wood et al., 2003).
New localities. - On 21 July, 2001, one specimen
(LSUHC 4792) was observed sleeping 2 m above
ground level on a trail in Telok Monkey at 80 m. This
species is found in coastal and lowland dipterocarp for-
est and constitutes a new record for this island.
Dryocalamus subannulatus Dumeril, Bibron and
Dumeril, 1854
Localities. - On beach 1 km south of Kampung
Tekek (Grismer et al., 2002a).
New localities. - On 14 August, 2002, one specimen
(LSUHC 5051) was observed at night crawling through
the branches of a tree 2 m above ground level at the bot-
tom of the Tekek-Juara trail near the Mosque at 80 m.
This species is found in coastal and lowland dipterocarp
forest.
Elaphe flavolineata Schlegel, 1837
Localities. - Kampung Tekek (Wood et al. 2004)
New localities. - On xx March, 2003, one juvenile
specimen (LSUHC- S3 752) was found dead on the road
in Kampung Tekek at 10 m in elevation. This species is
found in coastal vegetation.
Elaphe taeniura Cope, 1 86 1
Localities. - 100 m behind last house at Kampung
Juara (Hien et al., 2001).
New localities. - On 19 July, 2002, one specimen
(LSUHC 4675) was observed 2 m above ground level
crawling on the top of a large boulder on a trail in Telok
Monkey at 40 m immediately following an afternoon
rainshower. This species is found in coastal and lowland
dipterocarp forest.
Enhydris plumbea Boie, 1827
Localities. - Sungai Raya (Lim and Lim, 1999).
New localities. - On 9 November, 1997, two speci-
mens (at PERHILITAN uncatalogued) were collected
from the Sungai Besar in Kampung Tekek. On 9 July,
2001, a specimen (LSUHC 3817) was collected from
beneath a log at Kampung Pay a at sea level. This
species occurs in mangroves and coastal vegetation.
Fordonia leucobalia Schlegel, 1837
(Fig. 25)
Localities. - On 15 July, 2001, a specimen
(LSUPC-S3253) was collected from the drainage canals
at Persona Island Resort in Kampung Tekek at 5 m and
is currently maintained as a living specimen at the
Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research at the
National University of Singapore. This constitutes a
new island record. This species occurs in the man-
groves.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 275
Gongylosoma mukutense Grismer, Das, Leong, 2003
(Fig. 26)
Localities. - On 10 July, 2001, a specimen (ZRC
2.5 141) was found at 20 m in coastal vegetation on the
trail that leads from Kampung Mukut to Sungai Raya.
The specimen was being eaten by a juvenile Ptyas cari-
natus. An additional specimen (LSUHC 4680) was col-
lected from 190 m in elevation along the Tekek-Juara
trail on 16 July, 2002. This species occurs in coastal veg-
etation and lowland dipterocarp forest.
Gonyosoma oxycephalum Boie, 1827
(Fig. 27)
Localities. - A sight record from Nipah was report-
ed by Day (1990).
New localities. - A specimen was found resting on
a branch 10 m above the surface of a small river in
Kampung Juara. It was collected and photographed by
Pauli Hien. A photo of that specimen is deposited at La
Sierra University (LSUPC-S3633). This specimen con-
stitutes a new island record. This species occurs in
coastal forest.
Lepturophis albofuscus Dumeril, Bibron and Dumeril,
1854
Localities. - Sungai Nipah (Day, 1990).
New localities. - Two specimens (LSUHC 4588-89)
were collected at night along the Tekek-Juara trail at 180
m and 220 m, respectively, on 16 July, 2002. An addi-
tional juvenile specimen (ZRC 2.5144) with a black and
white banding pattern was collected from the Tekek-
Juara trail at 200 m on 11 July, 2001. An additional
specimen (LSUHC 4411) was collected along the
Sungai Mentawak at 195 m on 16 July, 2002. This
species occurs in lowland dipterocarp forest.
Liopeltis tricolor Schlegel, 1837
Localities. - Top of Tekek-Juara trail at 245 m
(Hendrickson, 1966a).
New localities. - A single adult (LSUHC 5037) was
collected during the day along the Gunung Kajang trail
at 618 m while resting on a small branch 2 m above
ground level. This species ranges from lowland diptero-
carp to high hill dipterocarp forest.
Oligodon purpurascens Schlegel, 1837
(Fig. 28)
Localities. - Ulu Lalang and the Tekek-Juara trail
(Hendrickson, 1966a; Day, 1990).
New localities. - On 9 July, 2001, a shed skin
(LSUHC 3988) with a pattern matching that of Oligodon
purpurascens was found at Telok Dungun within a rot-
ting log at 15 m. On 1 1 August, 2002, an adult was
found crawling across the forest floor during the day at
320 m on the Gunung Kajang trail. The Pulau Tioman
population is unlike all others in that the snakes are
bright red-orange in dorsal color and have smooth as
opposed to irregular dorsal band margins. This popula-
tion is under further investigation. This species ranges
from lowland dipterocarp forest to high hill dipterocarp
forest.
Oligodon booliati Leong and Grismer, 2004
Localities. - Ulu Lalang (Hendrickson 1966a).
New localities. - On 16 July, 2001 a specimen (ZRC
2.5153) was collected from the Tekek-Juara trail at
approximately 150 m in elevation. It differs from all
other Oligodon by its bright red coloration and extreme-
ly faint banding pattern. Its scale counts fall within the
range of those of O. signatus (Leong and Grismer,
2004). Hendrickson (1966a) reported O. signatus at Ulu
Lalang in high hill dipterocarp forest. Upon examina-
tion of that specimen (BPBM 13933) we find that it con-
forms to the new species (ZRC 2.5153) reported above.
This species ranges from lowland dipterocarp forest to
high hill dipterocarp forest.
P areas vertebralis Boulenger, 1900
Localities. - Gua Tengkok Air at 810 m (Youmans
et al., 2003).
New localities. - On xx March, 2003 an adult spec-
imen (LSUPC S3696-4000) was observed crawling
throught he lower branches of a small tree approximate-
ly 1.5 m above the ground. This species is known only
from high hill dipterocarp forest.
Psammodynastes pulvurulentus Boie, 1827
Localities. - Summit of Gunung Kajang at 1035 m
(Day, 1990).
New localities. - On 17 July, 2002 a juvenile speci-
men (LSUHC 4684) was collected along the Tekek-
Juara trail while sleeping on a leaf at 230 m. Another
specimen was collected and photographed (LSUPC-
S3631) from Air Batang near sea level by Johan van
Rooijen. This species ranges from coastal vegetation to
ridge forest.
Vol. 10, p. 276
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Ptyas carinatus Gunther, 1858
Localities. - Tekek-Juara trail (Grismer et ah,
2002a).
New localities. - On 3 November, 2000, a large
adult (LSUPC-S2774-80) was photographed on the
Tekek-Juara trail at 240 m in elevation. On 10 July
2001, a juvenile (ZRC 2.5142) was found on the trail
that leads from Kampung Mukut to the Sungai Raya at
20 m. The latter specimen was found eating a
Gongylosoma mukutense. On 20 July, 2002, an adult
was found crawling during the day on the Tekek water-
fall trail at 100 m. This species ranges from coastal veg-
etation to lowland dipterocarp forest.
Rhabdophis chrysargos Schlegel, 1837
(Fig. 29)
Localities. - Forest behing Kampung Juara
(Henrickson, 1966a).
New localities. - Hien et al. (2001) report this
species from the Sungai Mentawak at 150 m, at the
mouth of the Sungai Mentawak at sea level, and at
Tanjung Pisang Kera and Tanjung Batu Pulau at sea
level. We found a specimen (LSUHC 4791) at 80 m on
the Tekek-Juara trail near the Mosque. Hien et ah
(2001) report this population as Amphiesma sp. All
specimens we examined are within the variation report-
ed for Rhabdophis chrysargos except for coloration.
Specimens from the Pulau Tioman differ from others in
that adults are red anteriorly and juveniles are red-
orange throughout. Also, the white nuchal line is faint to
absent. This species occurs from mangroves to lowland
dipterocarp forest.
Sibynophis melanocephalus Gray, 1 834
(Fig. 30)
Localities. - On 18 July 2002, an adult (LSUHC
4683) was found crawling through the grass in
Kampung Juara (Grismer et ah, 2003). During capture,
it voluntarily broke off two sections of its tail in defense.
This specimen constitutes a new record for Pulau
Tioman. This species occurs in coastal vegetation.
Family Elapidae
Calliophis intestinalis Laurenti, 1768
Localities. - Telok Nipah and the Tekek-Juara trail
(Day, 1990).
New localities. - On 19 March, 2001, a specimen
(LSUPC-S 1038-40) was photographed on the trail to
Gunung Kajang at approximately 100 m in elevation
near the Sungai Mentawak. On 19 July, 2002, one spec-
imen (LSUHC 4617) was taken from a pitfall trap from
the upper array at 241 m. On 10 August, 2002, a speci-
men (LSUHC 5047) was collected crawling through the
leaf litter at Gua Tenguk Air at 845 m on Gunug Kajang.
This species occurs from lowland dipterocarp to high
hill dipterocarp forest.
Ophiophagus hannah Cantor, 1836
New localities. - A large adult (ca. 3.5 m) was pho-
tographed by Johan van Roojen in March, 2002 at Air
Batang at sea level (Van Rooijen and Van Rooijen,
2002). On Pulau Tioman this species is known only
from coastal vegetation but local people say it occurs
throughout the island (Hendrickson, 1966a). This
species occurs in mangrove and coastal vegetation.
Family: Viperidae
Trimeresurus sp.
(Fig. 31)
Localities. - Gunung Kajang at 400 m (Lim and
Lim, 1999); Gua Tenguk Air at 845 m (Day, 1990).
New localities. - On the evening 21 July, 2002, a
male was collected while sitting 7 m above ground level
on the end of a branch along the Tekek-Juara trail at 210
m. Lim and Lim (1999) referred to this species as
Trimeresurus cf. popeiorum. Its specific status is cur-
rently being investigated. This species ranges from low-
land to high hill dipterocarp forest.
Results and Discussion
The amphibians and reptiles of Pulau Tioman have vary-
ing patterns of distribution (Table 1). Some species (i.e.,
Cyrtodactylus tiomanensis and Psammodynastes pul-
verulentus ) range throughout many different vegetation
zones from coastal vegetation to ridge forest whereas
others, such as Philautus petersi, Draco haematopogon
and P areas vertebralis are restricted to only high eleva-
tions in high hill dipterocarp and/or ridge forest (Table
1). The majority of the species, however, are found in
lowland dipterocarp forest (Table 1). This region sup-
ports 74% of the amphibians, 76% of the lizards, and
74% of snakes, totaling 74% of the island’s species com-
position. The high species diversity in this vegetative
zone is due largely to its varied habitat and microhabitat
composition. Here, the terrain is characterized by many
large boulder outcrops and fast flowing, boulder-strewn
streams. The crevices, exfoliations, and shaded refugia
offered by the boulders, along with the additional micro-
habitats these features provide along a water course, add
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 277
greatly to the microhabitat diversity of this forest. Such
microhabitat diversity allows many species to specialize
into narrow environmental zones. In fact, species which
range throughout all the vegetative zones (i.e.,
Sphenomorphus scotophilus and Cyrtodactylus tioma-
nensis) do so because of their association with the
microhabitats offered by boulders. There are more
restricted species such as Ansonia tiomanica which
occur only in habitats with large boulders in the vicinity
of water at elevations above 220 m. Whereas others
(i.e., Rana hosii , Ichthyophis sp., Dogania subplana,
Gonocephalus grandis ) are confined to riparian habitats.
The species composition of the distribution patterns
will undoubtedly change with the acquisition of addi-
tional specimens. Many of the species reported from
Pulau Tioman are known from a limited number of indi-
viduals and thus, appear to exist in a limited range of
habitats. These species range throughout a far greater
number of habitats on peninsular Malaysia and so it is
likely they do so as well on Pulau Tioman. However,
even with the acquisition of new material the generality
of the observed trends in habitat use are not likely to
change significantly.
There are two sightings of unconfirmed species on
Pulau Tioman listed in an unpublished report by Day
(1990). Day's sightings range from specimens he actu-
ally observed to second hand reports he received from
locals, vacationers, and friends. Species he personally
observed (i.e., Chrysopelea paradise, see Lim and Lim,
1990 for discussion) are considered as potentially pres-
ent. The others, Leiolepis belliana and Elaphe por-
phyracea are not considered noteworthy herein. Day
(1990) also reported Rana doriae from a small tributary
of the Sungai Mentawak at 290 m. Examination of these
specimens (uncatalogued in the British Museum of
Natural History) show them to be Limnonectes blythii.
Hien et al. (2001) report that the Lycodon effraenis
reported by Manthey and Grossman (1997) was a juve-
nile Lepturophis albofuscus.
Acknowledgments
We thank Mr. Sahir bin Othman, Director of Wildlife,
PERHILITAN, for permission to conduct field work in
the Seribuat Archipelago and Peter Ng, Chang Man
Yang and Kelvin Kok Peng Lim (ZRC) and Carla H.
Kishinami (BPBM) for permitting us to examine mate-
rial under their care. We also thank all the Malaysain and
American students of the Tropical Field Biology classes
BIOL 487F and G of 2001 and 2002, respectively for
their help in the field. For comments on the manuscript
we thank J. McGuire and R. Brown.
Literature Cited
Ashton, P. S. 1995. Biogeography and ecology. In:
Soepadmo, E. & Wong, K. M. (eds.) Tree Flora of
Sabah and Sarawak. Vol. 1. Forestry Research
Institute Malaysia, Sabah Forest Department and
Sarawak Forest Department, Kuala Lumpur. Pp.
XLIII-LI.
Boulenger, G. A. 1912. A Vertebrate Fauna of the Malay
Peninsula: Reptilia and Batrachia. Taylor and
Francis, London. 294 pp.
Das, I. and L. L. Grismer. 2003. Two new species of
Cnemaspis Strauch, 1887 (Squamata: Gekkonidae)
from the Seribuat Archipelago, Pahang and Johor
states, West Malaysia. Herpetologica 59:544-552.
Day, M. 1990. Zoological Research. In: Day, M. and
T. Mowbrey (eds.). University of Bristol Tioman
Archipelago Expedition, Peninsular Malaysia,
1988, Final Report. Unpublished Report pp. 25-43.
Denzer, W., U. Manthey and C. Steiof, 1989.
Erstnachweis microhylider Froesche auf Pulau
Tioman- West-Malaysia. Sauria 11:27-30.
de Haas, C. P. J. 1949. The genus Natrix in the collec-
tion of the Raffles Museum and its distribution in
the Malay Peninsula. Bulletin of the Raffles
Museum 19:78-97.
Diaz, R. E., T. M. Leong, L. L. Grismer, and N. Yaakob.
2004. A new species of Dibamus (Squamata:
Dibamidae) from West Malaysia. Asiatic
Herpetological Research 10:1-7
Escobar, III, R. A., J. L. Grismer, and T. M. Youmans.
2003. Kalophrynus pleurostigma. Geographic dis-
tribution. Herpetological Review 33:317-318.
Escobar, III, R. A., J. Castro, D. Morgan, S. M. Hover,
T. R. Stutz, K. McCloskey, and R. Gregory. 2002a.
Additions to the herpetofauna of Pulau Aur, Johor,
West Malaysia. Hamadryad 27:287-288.
Escobar, III, R. A., T. M. Youmans, J. L. Grismer, P.
L.Wood, S. D. Kendall, J. Castro, D. Morgan, C.
Rasmussen, T. Magi, T. R. Stutz, S. M. Hover, C.
Raynor, K. McCloskey, A. Hunter, J. M. Bernard,
N. Hinojosa, T. Dyer, J. Anlauf, J. Martinez, S.
Andreiko, R. Gregory, L. S. Yeen, H. Kaiser, and L.
L. Grismer. 2002b. First report on the herpetofau-
na of Pulau Tinggi, Johor, West Malaysia.
Hamadryad 27:259-262.
Vol. 10, p. 278
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Grismer, J. L., R. A. Escobar, III, and T. M.
Youmans. 2003a. Theloderma horridum.
Geographic distribution. Herpetological Review
33:22.
Grismer, J. L., T. M. Leong, and N. S. Yaakob.
2003. Two new Southeast Asian skinks of the genus
Larutia and intrageneric phylogenetic relationships.
Herpetologica 59:552-564.
Grismer, J. L., C. Rasmussen, and R Wood, Jr.
2003. Sibynophis melanocephalus. Geographic dis-
tribution. Herpetological Review 34:266.
Grismer, L. L., I. Das, and T. M. Leong. 2003b. A new
species of Gongylosoma (Squamata: Colubridae)
from Pulau Tioman. Herpetologica 59:565-572.
Grismer, L. L., H. Kaiser, and N. S. Yaakob. 2004. A
new species of reed snake of the genus Calamaria
Boie, 1827 from Pulau Tioman, Pahang, West
Malaysia. Hamadryad 28:1-6.
Grismer, L. L., J. L. Grismer, and T. M. Youmans.
2004b. A new species of Leptolalax (Anura:
Megophryidae) from Pulau Tioman. Asiatic
Herpetological Research 10:8-11.
Grismer, L. L., J. A. McGuire, R. A. Sosa, and H. Kaiser,
2002a. Revised checklist and comments on the ter-
restrial herpetofauna of Pulau Tioman, Peninsular
Malaysia. Herpetological Review 33:26-29.
Grismer, L. L., N. S. Yaakob, L. B. Liat, T. M. Leong,
I. Das, R. A. Sosa, J. L. Grismer, K. M. Crane, R. E.
Diaz, S. V. Figueroa, C. A. Ledbetter, S. C.
Newbold, S. R. Newbold, C. P. Patel, J. Castro, R.
A. Escobar III, S. Guerrero, J. W. Pinedo, and
Hinrich Kaiser. 2001a. First report on the herpeto-
fauna of Pulau Aur, Johor, West Malaysia.
Hamadryad 26:350-353.
Grismer, L. L., N. S. Yaakob, L. B. Liat, T. M. Leong, I.
Das, R. A. Sosa, J. L. Grismer, K. M. Crane, R. E.
Diaz, S. V. Figueroa, C. A. Ledbetter, S. C.
Newbold, S. R. Newbold, C. P. Patel, J. Castro, R.
A. Escobar III, S. Guerrero, J. W. Pinedo, P. E.
Jones, and Hinrich Kaiser, 2001b. Report on the
herpetofauna of Pulau Tulai, West Malaysia.
Hamadryad 26:369-371.
Hendrickson, J. R. 1966a. Observations on the fauna of
Pulau Tioman and Pulau Tulai. 5. The reptiles.
Bulletin of the National Museum of Singapore
34:53-71.
Hendrickson, J. R. 1966b. Observations on the fauna of
Pulau Tioman and Pulau Tulai. 6. The a m p h i b -
ians. Bulletin of the National Museum of Singapore
34:72-84.
Hien, P., W. Grossmann, and C. Schafer. 2001. Beitrag
zur kenntnis der landbewohnenden reptilien fau-
navon Pulau Tioman, West-Malaysia. Sauria
23:11-28.
Inger, R. F. and H. Marx. 1965. The systematics and
evolution of the Oriental colubrid snakes of the
genus Calamaria. Fieldiana: Zoology 49:1-304.
Inger, R. F. and H. K. Voris. 2001. The biogeographi-
cal relations of the frogs and snakes of Sundaland.
Journal of Biogeography 28:863-891.
Latiff, A., I. F. Hanum, A. Z. Ibrahim, M. W. K. Goh, A.
H. B. Loo, and H. T. W. Tan. 1999. On the vegeta-
tion and flora of Pulau Tioman, Peninsular
Malaysia. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology. Supplement
6:11-72.
Leong, T. M. 2000. Limnonectes hascheanus.
Geographic distribution. Herpetological Review
31:182.
Leong, T. M and K. Crane. 2002. Nyctixalus pictus.
Geographic distribution. Herpetological Review
33:62.
Leong, T. M. and L. L. Grismer. 2004. A new species
of kukri snake, Oligodon (Colubridae) from Pulau
Tioman, West Malaysia. Asiatic Herpetological
Research 10:12-16.
Lim, K. K. P., and L. J. Lim. 1999. The terrestrial her-
petofauna of Pulau Tioman, Peninsular Malaysia.
Raffles Bulletin of Zoology. Supplement 6: 13 1-155.
Manthey, U. and W. Grossmann. 1997. Amphibien &
Reptilien Sudostasiens. Natur und Tier, Verlag 512
pp.
Smith, M. A. 1930. The Reptilia and Amphibia of the
Malay Peninsula from the Isthmus of Kra to
Singapore including the adjacent islands. Bulletin
of the Raffles Museum 3:1-14.
Van Rooijen, J. and M. Van Rooijen. 2002. Einige e
rganzungen, berichtigungen und neue beobach tun-
gen zur herpetofauna von Pulau Tioman, West
Malaysia. Sauria 24:3-12.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 279
Wood, P. L., T. M. Youmans, C. Raynor, J. M. Bernard,
N. Hinojosa, T. Dyer, S. Andreiko, P. P. van Dijk, W.
Wuertz, L. S. Yeen, and N. A. Elias. 2002. First
report on the herpetofauna of Pulau Dyang, Johor,
West Malaysia. Hamadryad 27:284-285.
Wood, P. L. , N. A. Elias, and D. Morgan. 2003.
Dendreiaphis striatus. Geographic distribution.
Herpetological Review 34:264.
Wood, P. L. , T. M. Youmans, and T. R. Szutz. 2004.
Elaphe flavolineata. Geographic distribution.
Herpetological Review 34:88.
Wood, P. L., T. M. Youmans, J. L. Grismer, J. Wheatly, S.
Wright, C. Valdivia, A. Ponce, L. Escobar, S. Amin,
P. Baker, J. Bernard, S. Looper, N. Marsh, L.
Martin, N. Padilla, R. Rosser, A. Srivastava, V.
Srivastava, X. Wright, L. S. Yeen, H. Kaiser, and L.
L. Grismer. 2004a. First report of the herpetofauna
of Pulau Sibu, Johor, West Malaysia. Hamadryad, in
press.
Wood, P L., H. Kaiser, S. Looper, T. M. Youmans, J. L.
Grismer, and L. L. Grismer. 2004b. First report on
the herpetofauna of Pulau Besar, Johor, West
Malaysia. Hamadryad, in press.
Youmans, T. M., R. E. Escobar, III, J. L. Grismer, L. L.
Grismer, and R. Johnson. 2002. First report on the
herpetofauna of Pulau Pemanggil, West Malaysia.
Hamadryad 27: 148-149.
Youmans. T. M., P. L. Wood, and T. R. Szutz. 2003.
Pareas vertebraliss. Geographic distribution.
Herpetological Review 34:389.
Pareas stanleyi - A Record New to Sichuan, China
and a Key to the Chinese Species
Peng Guo1 and Ermi Zhao2
1 College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China 610041
-Chengdu Institute of Biology’, Chinese Academy of Sciences Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China 610041
Abstract. - A specimen of the Fujian slug-eating snake, Pareas stanleyi , was collected in Sichuan Province, China
for the first time. We provide a key to the Chinese species of Pareas.
Keywords. - Serpentes, Colubridae, Pareas , China, Sichuan.
An adult male of the Fujian slug-eating snake, Pareas
stanleyi (Boulenger, 1914) was captured from
Muchansi, Liujiang Town, Hongya County,
Southwestern Sichuan Province, China at noon on 02
June, 2003 (Fig. 1). This species was first described
based on one male specimen from N. W. Fokien
(=Fujian Province). It was successively found in
Zhejiang (Longquan), Jiangxi (Mt. Jinggangshan),
Guizhou (Leishan), and also Fujian (Chongan, Nanjing,
Pucheng, Shaowu). All the localities are situated within
108° 10' N, 119° 10' E and 26° 20' N, 28° 10' N. The geo-
graphic position of Liujiang Town is between 29° 44' N
and 103° 13' E . The discovery of Pareas stanleyi from
Liujiang Town extends its range about 5 degrees west-
ward and about 1.5 degrees northward. The distribution
pattern of Pareas stanleyi is Southern China.
SCU No. 20030049
An adult male. Head distinct from the neck, snout blunt,
body somewhat compressed. Rostral high, visible from
above of the head; intemasals shorter than prefrontals;
no preoculars; loreals large, its posterior end entering the
eye; prefrontals extending laterally to the sides of the
head, and touching the eye at its anterior upper corner;
supraoculars small; postoculars narrower and in contact
with the long narrower crescent subocular, which com-
pletely encircling the posterior and inferior border of the
eye; two anterior temporals, three posterior temporals;
upper labials seven, excluded from orbit; mental very
small; lower labials eight, anterior three or four in con-
tact with the anterior chin-shield; the latter three pairs,
no mental groove. Dorsal scales in fifteen rows through-
out, three median rows feebly keeled at the neck region,
seven median rows feebly keeled at the midbody, all but
the outer one row keeled before the vent, vertebral row
not enlarged; ventrals 153; anal entire; subcaudals in
pairs, 54/54+1. The coloration of this specimen is iden-
tical with the original description by G. A. Boulenger
(1914). The total length of the male Hongya specimen is
630.5 mm with a tail length of 110.5 mm. The tail is
about 17.5% of the total length.
Twenty species belong to the genus Pareas Wagler,
1830 (Welch, 1988). It ranges over East Asia,
Southeastern Asia, and South Asia (Bangladesh, Burma,
China, India [Assam], Indonesia, Japan, Kampuchea,
Laos, Malaysia, Sikkim, Thailand, and Vietnam). In
China, nine species are recognized (Zhao et al., 1998).
The authors of this paper believe that Pareas macularius
Theobald, 1868 is a synonym of P. margaritophorus
(Jan, 1866), P. komaii (Maki, 1931) is a synonym of P.
formosensis (VanDenburgh, 1909), and P. chinensis
(Barbour, 1912) may be a synonym of P. hamptoni
(Boulenger, 1905). Thus, there are only seven species
found in China, which may be distinguished by means of
the following key;
Key to Chinese Pareas
Figure 1. Pareas stanleyi from Sichuan Province, China.
1A Color purplish blue or purplish brown, with many
black and white dorsal scales forming many short trans-
verse bands Pareas margaritophorus
IB Color dark or light brown, many dorsal scales with
small black spots forming transverse line or
reticulation
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 281
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
2 A Mo prefrontal P areas carinatus
2B With prefrontal and entering the eye 3
3 A No preocular, loreal entering the eye 4
3B Preocular present, loreal not entering the eye (or only
its tip entering the eye) 6
4A Dorsal scales smooth 5
4B Dorsal scales keeled but the outer row smooth; back
of head with big black blotch P areas stanleyi
5A Vertebral enlarged; the fourth upper labial entering
the eye; ventrals more than 190; subcaudals more than
72; a black "X"-shaped mark behind the
parietals P areas monticola
5B Vertebral not enlarged; the fourth upper labial not
entering the eye; ventrals less than 190; subcaudals less
than 77 P areas boulengeri
6A The second upper labial touching or not touching the
crescent subocular, found only in Taiwan
Province P areas formosensis
6B The second upper labial not touching the crescent
subocular, found in mainland Pareas hamptoni
Literature Cited
Boulenger, G: A. 1914. Descriptions of new species of
snakes in the collection of the British Museum. The
Annals and Magazine of Natural History, London,
ser. 8, 14(84):482-485.
Pope, C. H. 1935. The Reptiles of China. American
Museum of Natural History, New York, Natural
History Central Asia, 10: lii, 1-604, 27 uncolored
plates, folding map.
Welch, K. R. G. 1988. Snakes of the Orient: A Checklist.
Robert E. Krieger, Malabar (Florida), vii, 183 pp.
Zhao, E. M. and K. Adler 1993. Herpetology of China.
SSAR & CSSAR, Ohio, 522 pp. 48 colored plates,
3 maps.
Zhao, E. M., M. H. Huang, and Y. Zong. 1998. Fauna
Sinica, Reptilia, Vol. 3: Serpentes. Science Press,
Beijing, 522 pp., 12 plates.
Intraspecific and Interspecific Genome Size Variation in yno n
Salamanders of Russia and Kazakhstan: Determination y
Flow Cytometry
Spartak N. Litvinchuk1’*, Leo J. Borkin2 and Jury M. Rosanov
' Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tikhoretsky pr. 4, St. Petersburg 194064, Russia,
* E-mail : slitvinchuk@yahoo.com
^Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia
Abstract. - The amount of DNA per diploid nucleus in Salamandrella keyserlingii and Onychodactylus fischeri from
Russia, as well as in Ranodon sibiricus from Kazakhstan was determined by flow cytometry. Onychodactylus fischeri
had the highest genome size, Ranodon sibiricus the lowest, and Salamandrella keyserlingii was intermediate. Obvious
geographic variation in genome size was revealed for Salamandrella keyserlingii and Ranodon sibiricus. The com-
parison of nuclear DNA content in eleven hynobiid species supported the genus Onychodactylus as a separate line-
age.
Key words. - nuclear DNA content, genome size, flow cytometry, Caudata, Hynobiidae, Onychodactylus fischeri,
Salamandrella keyserlingii, Ranodon sibiricus, Russia, Kazakhstan.
Introduction
Diploid genome size, measured in picograms (pg; 1 pg
= 10'12 g) of DNA per nucleus, varies widely in verte-
brates. Living amphibians represent the largest range of
genome size variability among terrestrial vertebrates,
with a minimum of 1.7 pg in male frogs of
Eleutherodactylus shrevei (Schmid et al., 2002) and
maximum of 241 pg in Necturus lewisi (Olmo, 1973).
Some extinct amphibians may have had maximum DNA
contents greater (approximately 300 pg) than the maxi-
mum known in living forms (Thoson and Muraszko,
1978).
Various methods are used for the measuring of
genome size in amphibians (for example, biochemical
analysis, Feulgen densitometry, static cell fluorometry,
ultraviolet microscopy, etc.). However, modem studies
are based on a comparatively new and very precise
method of flow DNA cytometry. As a rule, standard
errors of this method (peak mean ratios) are less than
0.5% (Rosanov and Vinogradov, 1998). Among approx-
imately 415 amphibian species examined, nuclear DNA
contents were studied by flow cytometry in about 143
species only (Gregory, 2001a).
Among some specific applications, DNA flow
cytometry has been used to examine ploidy levels
(Borkin et al., 1986, 1996, 2001a; Vinogradov et al.,
1990; Sharbel et al., 1997; Litvinchuk et al., 1998,
2001), to identify morphologically similar species
(Sharbel et al., 1995; MacCulloch et al., 1996;
Litvinchuk et al., 1997, 1999; Murphy et al., 1997;
Borkin et al., 2001b, 2003; Khalturin et al., 2003), and
to search for hybrid individuals (Borkin et al., 1987,
2002; Litvinchuk et al., 2003). Many authors have noted
a relationship between genome size and some biological
parameters, such as cellular and nuclear sizes, replica-
tion time, cell-cycle length, cell division rate, metabolic
rate, longevity, morphological complexity in the brain,
etc. (Van't Hoff and Sparrow, 1963; Goin et al., 1968;
Olmo and Morescalchi, 1975; Bachmann and Nishioka,
1978; Sessions and Larson, 1987; Shakhbazov and
Gapchenko, 1990; Licht and Lowcock, 1991; Nevo and
Beiles, 1991; Roth et al., 1994; Vinogradov, 1999;
Gregory, 2001b, 2001c; Griffith et al., 2003). However,
an adaptive value of genome size is most clearly shown
in its relationship with the timing of embryonic develop-
ment in amphibians (Bachmann, 1972; Oeldorf et al.,
1978; Homer and Macgregor, 1983; Pagel and Jonstone,
1992; Jockusch, 1997; Chipman et al., 2001; Gregory,
2002, 2003).
This research is focused on salamanders of the fam-
ily Hynobiidae, which consists of approximately 42
species. Among modem amphibians, hynobiids are rec-
ognized to be one of the primitive urodelans (e.g.,
Duellman and Trueb, 1986; Larson and Dimmick,
1993). Hynobiids inhabit various mountain regions of
Palaearctic Asia, where they have quite restricted
ranges. The territory of Russia and Kazakhstan are only
inhabited by three hynobiid species. Other family mem-
bers, such as the Siberian Salamander ( Salamandrella
keyserlingii ), is widely distributed from Northeastern
European Russia to the Kamchatka Peninsula. The
Ussuri Clawed Salamander {Onychodactylus fischeri)
can be found in the southern part of Russian Far East and
in the Korean Peninsula. The Semirechensk salamander
{Ranodon sibiricus) inhabits the Dzhungarsky Alatau
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 283
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Figure 1. Distribution of Salamandrella keyserlingii (grayish area), Ranodon sibiricus (dark square), and
Onychodactylus fischeri (dark-grayish area), with localities studied (locality number as in Table 1). Dark circles desig-
nate the "Euro-Siberian" type of Salamandrella keyserlingii , white ones - "Primorsky" type.
Mountains in southeastern Kazakhstan and adjacent
China. The last two species are included in the Russian
and Kazakhstan Red Data Books, respectively. Ranodon
sibiricus is also included in the IUCN Red List of
Threatened Animals under the category "vulnerable"
(Borkin, 1998; Kuzmin, 1999). The goal of present
paper is to evaluate the intra- and interspecific genome
size variation in three hynobiid species of Russia and
Kazakhstan, with flow cytometry.
Peripheral blood cells of specimens of the Ribbed
Newt, Pleurodeles waltl, received from Prof. J. C.
Lacroix (Universite Paris VI, Paris, France) were used
as a reference standard. Details of the technique have
been published previously (Vinogradov et al., 1990;
Rosanov and Vinogradov, 1998; Borkin et al., 2001).
The relative genome size differences (RD) were calcu-
lated with use of formula: RD=(ml-m2)/(ml+m2) *
200%, where ml and m2 are the sample means.
Materials and methods
Results
Eighty-eight metamorphosed specimens from 13 popu-
lations of three species distributed in Russia and
Kazakhstan were used in this study of genome size vari-
ation. Blood was taken from the clipped tail tip. The
samples of Salamandrella keyserlingii and
Onychodactylus fischeri studied are kept at the collec-
tions of the Department of Herpetology, Zoological
Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences. All specimens
of Ranodon sibiricus were obtained from the Almaty
Zoo (Kazakhstan), and after preparation of blood sam-
ples, the live salamanders were sent to the Moscow Zoo.
The genome size variation in three hynobiid species var-
ied between 54.5 and 109.0 pg (Table 1). The lowest
nuclear DNA content was recorded in Ranodon sibiricus
(in average 55.4 pg), whereas the highest was in
Onychodactylus fischeri (107.7 pg). Salamandrella key-
serlingii was intermediate in size (66.4 pg).
Differences between populations were studied in
two species, represented by more than one sample. In S.
keyserlingii , ten samples were allocated to two main,
distinct groups with different genome sizes (Table 1 and
Fig. 1). The geographic distribution of these two groups
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 284
Table 1. Locality of origin ("Lat" is latitude, and "Lon" is longitude), sample size, genome size (in picograms, SD is
standard deviation) with the coefficient of variation (CV; in percents) for 13 populations of three hynobiid species.
Table 2. The genome size (GS; in picograms) of hynobiids, referred by some authors.
Species Locality GS Reference
Hynobius (Hynobius) dunni
H. (H.) nebulosus
H. (H.) tsuensis
H. (Satobius) retardatus
H. (Pseudosalamandra) naevis
Onychodactylus fischeri
O. japonicus
Paradactylodon gorganensis
P. mustersi
Ranodon sibincus
Salamandrella keyserlingii
Olmo, 1973
Olmo, 1973
Olmo, 1973
Olmo, 1973
Olmo, 1973
Mazin, 1978
Vinogradov, 1998
Present paper
Olmo, 1983
Stock, 1999
Morescalchi et al., 1979
Morescalchi et al., 1979
Vinogradov, 1998
Present paper
Mazin, 1978
Morescalchi et al., 1979
Grafodatsky and Grigoriev, 1982
Vladychenskaya et al., 1988
Vinogradov, 1998
Present paper
1Flow cytometry; 2Feulgen's densitometry; ^Kinetics reassociation.
Vol. 10, p. 285
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Table 3. Genome size (2C), range of egg diameters (mm), and time of embryonic ("Embr.") and larval ("Larv.") devel-
opment (days) in some hynobiids.
1 Laboratory conditions (temperature unknown); 2nature conditions; 3t = 10°; 4t = 16°.
Table 4. Genome size (2C), diploid number of chromosomes (2n) and number of uniarmed macrochromosomes (UM)
in some hynobiids.
2004
Vol. 10, p. 286
65 66 67 68
Genome Size (pg)
Figure 2. Genome size distribution in Salamandrella key-
serlingii.
of samples proved to not be chaotic and the "Euro-
Siberian" (8 samples) and "Primorsky" (2 samples)
groups were recognized. The data ranges of the groups
did not overlap, and the gap between both groups was
equal to 0.3 pg (Fig. 2). The "Primorsky" samples were
characterized by smaller genome size in comparison
with the "Euro-Siberian" ones: 64.4-65.2 pg vs. 65.5-
68.1 pg; the means were 64.8 pg vs. 66.9 pg. The differ-
ences (RD) between means were equal to 3.2%, and
were observed in five separate comparisons. Therefore,
these groups were shaped both by genome size and geo-
graphically.
The samples of R. sibiricus were taken from two
semi-isolated populations from upper parts of
Borokhudzir and Oy-Saz rivers. Both samples demon-
strated different genome sizes (Table 1). The ranges of
genome size values in these two samples slightly over-
lapped. The Oy-Saz sample was characterized by small-
er genome size in comparison with the Borokhudzir
sample: 54.5-55.1 pg vs. 55.1-56.7 pg; the means are
54.8 pg vs. 56.0 pg. The differences (RD) between
means were equal to 2.2%.
The coefficient of variation (CV) ranged between
0.3% and 0.9% in S. keyserlingii , between 0.3% and
1.0% in R. sibiricus , and was equal to 0.7% in the sam-
ple of O. fischeri (Table 1). The overall within-species
genome size variation in S. keyserlingii and R. sibiricus
were quite similar (1.5% and 1.3%, respectively).
Among the "Euro-Siberian" samples of S. keyserlingii ,
the CVs ranged between 0.3% (Nizhny Novgorod
Province) and 0.9% (Tomsk Province), whereas it was
equal to 0.4% in the "Primorsky" samples of S. keyser-
lingii.
Discussion
1) Genome size values in hynobiids: literature data
Presently, the nuclear DNA content has been determined
for eleven hynobiid species. However, among them,
only four species were examined through flow cytome-
try (Table 2). The first data collected about genome size
of nine hynobiid species was obtained by Italian
researchers with an application of Feulgen densitometry
(Olmo, 1973, 1983; Olmo and Morescalchi, 1975;
Morescalchi et al., 1979). According to these data,
genome size in hynobiids ranged from 32.96 pg in
Hynobius tsuensis to 102-106 pg in Onychodactylus
japonicus (Table 2). According to Mazin (1978), the
nuclear DNA content in two Russian species,
Onychodactylus fischeri and Salamandrella
(" Hynobius") keyserlingii, measured by Feulgen densit-
ometry, were similar to each other (45.5 and 42.5 pg,
respectively). Grafodatsky and Grigoriev (1982) esti-
mated genome size of Salamandrella keyserlingii (38
pg), perhaps, by means of Feulgen densitometry.
Vladychenskaya et al. (1988) studied kinetics of DNA
reassociation; they found that the nuclear DNA content
of Salamandrella keyserlingii was equal to 33.2 pg.
Using DNA flow cytometry, Vinogradov (1998) esti-
mated genome size values as 95.08 pg for
Onychodactylus fischeri, 45.59 pg for Ranodon sibiri-
cus, and 55.48 pg for Salamandrella keyserlingii.
Finally, Stock (1999) determined that genome size of
Batrachuperus gorganensis is 34.77 pg, using DNA
flow cytometry as well.
The literature values of genome size for
Onychodactylus fischeri, Ranodon sibiricus , and
Salamandrella keyserlingii expressed in absolute units
vary sometimes more than two-fold (ranges are 45.5-
95.1 pg, 45.6-50.7 pg, and 33.2-55.5 pg, respectively).
Therefore, the comparison of data provided by various
authors should be made cautiously. The contradictions
may be explained by an application of different tech-
niques (Feulgen densitometry, kinetics reassociation,
and flow cytometry), dyes, and laboratory conditions
(cell preparation methods, devices for measurements,
types of reference cell standards, etc.). It has been shown
that genome size measured with fluorochromes of dif-
ferent nucleotide specificity may differ markedly (e.g.,
Johnston et al., 1987; Birshtein et al., 1993; Vinogradov
and Borkin, 1993). For instance, the determination of
genome size by means of flow cytometry for cell sam-
ples of Salamandrella keyserlingii stained with
olivomycin and Hoechst (GC- and AT-specific fluo-
rochromes, respectively) provided 6.68 and 4.77 arbi-
trary units (Rana temporaria was taken as an internal
reference; Vinogradov, 1998). To exclude the influence
Vol. 10, p. 287
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
of AT/GC-structure, it is necessary to use ethidium bro-
mide or propidium iodide (Vinogradov and Borkin,
1993), which were used in our research.
To convert genome size from the relative units to
picograms, it is necessary to have data about genome
size of reference cells. Such data should be obtained
without using stains. Unfortunately, the data available
today, mentioned by various authors, do not correspond
to each other. For instance, Vinogradov (1998) reported
a genome size of reference standard Mas musculus to be
6.5 pg. Our estimations of genome size of some mam-
mals ( Homo sapiens , Mas mas cal as, Rattas norvegicas )
were the closest to that mentioned by Bianchi et al.
(1983). In our work, we used the genome size of males
of Mas musculus (C57B1) as a basic reference standard
with value of 6.8 pg. Other authors preferred other ref-
erence standards, which have different base-pair-speci-
ficity of some stains widely used in flow cytometry.
Vinogradov and Borkin (1993) listed the AT- and GC-
pair specific DNA contents (CAT and CGC) for many
species of amphibians. For instance, CAT/CGC was
equal to 1 .42 in Xenopas laevis (Mazin's reference stan-
dard), and 1.00 in Rana lessonae (= Rana " esculenta
Olmo's and Morescalchi's standard).
The estimations of Italian authors (Olmo, 1973,
1 983 ; Morescalchi et al., 1 979) and our genome size val-
ues for Ranodon sibiricas (50.7 and 54.5-56.7 pg,
respectively) and members of genus Onychodactylus
(102.0-106.0 and 106.7-109.0 pg, respectively) are quite
similar. However, data for Salamandrella keyserlingii
(42.3 and 64.4-68.1 pg, respectively) are in obvious dis-
cordance. The genome size of Onychodactylus fischeri ,
Ranodon sibiricas, and Salamandrella keyserlingii men-
tioned by Vinogradov (1998), was lower than our val-
ues, who used other stains and lower genome size esti-
mation of basic reference standard.
Unfortunately, some authors did not supply any
information about sample sizes and localities. However,
some differences in genome size might be influenced by
intra-population and geographic variation as well.
2) Within-species variation
Some authors discussed the levels of intraspecific varia-
tion in genome size. We recognized two kinds of such a
variation; namely, the "within-population" variation and
"between-population" (or geographical) variation.
A) Within Population Variation
Among amphibians, the greatest intrapopulational vari-
ation (CV = 7.5%, the data of Licht and Lowcock, 1991
were recalculated by us) was recorded for the Western
Red-back Salamander {Plethodon vehicalam). However,
the variation in other amphibian species was consider-
ably lower (Licht and Lowcock, 1991; MacCulloch et
al., 1996; Murphy et al., 1997; Lizana et al., 2000). The
variation within populations of three hynobiid species
(CVs were 0.3- 1.0%, mean was 0.67 ± 0.12%) was quite
similar to that in salamandrids (range is 0.1 -1.7%, mean
is 0.64 ± 0.03%, 99 populations studied), pelobatids, and
other anurans studied in our laboratory at the same con-
ditions (Litvinchuk et al., 1997, 1999, 200 1 a, b, 2003;
Rosanov and Vinogradov, 1998; Borkin et al., 2001b,
2003; our data).
Sexual dimorphism in genome size has been regis-
tered in some amphibian species (Schmid et al., 2002;
our data). Unfortunately, in the hynobiids examined by
us, sexual differences are not expressed in external char-
acters beyond the breeding time. Our study was based
mostly on juvenile and non-breeding adult animals, and,
therefore, we failed to reliably identify the sex without
anatomical dissections.
B) Geographical Variation
The significant geographical variation in genome size
was revealed for several amphibian species (Licht and
Lowcock, 1991; Murphy et al., 1997; Litvinchuk et al.,
1999, 2001b). In a few cases, differences (RD) exceed-
ed 8%. However, in the majority of species studied, such
differences were about 1% (Licht and Lowckock, 1991;
Borkin et al., 1997, 2000, 2001, 2003; Litvinchuk et al.,
1997, 1999, 2001b, 2003; our data). In Salamandrella
keyserlingii, the maximum genome size difference (RD
= 4.5%) was found between samples from the Khandyga
(Yakutia Republic) and Kedrovaya Pad' Reserve
(Primorsky Territory). The average differences (RD)
between the "Euro-Siberian" and the "Primorsky" sam-
ple groups of the species were equal to 3.2%.
3) Interspecies differences: developmental and kary-
ological correlations
Eleven species of the family Hynobiidae may be divid-
ed into two groups by their genome size. Two species of
the genus Onychodactylus form a group with the largest
genomes (104-108 pg). They also have the longest
embryonic and larval development periods (Table 3), as
well as the greatest number of chromosomes (Table 4).
Another group includes the remaining nine species
(33-67 pg). Among them, Salamandrella keyserlingii
has the largest genome size, and the seven species from
the genera Hynobius and Batrachuperus have smaller
sizes. Ranodon sibiricas has an intermediate genome
size. Such a distribution of genome sizes in the second
group does not seem to be associated with ovum diame-
ter, and, perhaps, with time of embryonic and larval
development (Table 3).
The comparison of genome size values in the sec-
ond group with karyological data evidenced no signifi-
2004
cant relations between the nuclear DNA content and
diploid chromosome numbers (Table 4). Nevertheless,
we found the positive correlation (r = 0.9998) between
genome size and uniarmed macrochromosome numbers.
4) Intergeneric relationships
Based on recent studies (Fei and Ye, 2000a; Fu et al.,
2001), approximately eight or ten genera of the hynobi-
ids could be recognized. The most speciose genus,
Hynobins, consists of about 24 species, which may be
arranged into three subgenera (Matsui et al., 1992;
Mizuno et al., 1995; Borkin, 1999), namely
Pseudosalamandra (7 species from Japan and Taiwan),
Satobius (1 species from Hokkaido Island), and
Hynobius (11 species from Japan, and, perhaps, 5
species from Korea and China). The family also includes
the genera Liua (1 species), Onychodactylus (2 species),
P achy hynobius (1 species), Protohynobius (1 species),
Pseudohynobius (2 species), Ranodon (1 species),
Salamandrella (1 species, which penetrates to eastern
Europe), and Batrachuperus (sensu lato) (about 9
species). The taxonomic position of Ranodon , Liua, and
Pseudohynobius was discussed (Fei and Ye, 2000b;
Kuzmin and Thiesmeier, 2001). Based on mitochondrial
DNA study, T. Papenfuss (Pers. comm, in Fu et al.,
2001) showed that the genus Batrachuperus is para-
phyletic, and consists of two groups with distinct geo-
graphic distributions. The Eastern (Chinese) group
belongs to Batrachuperus (sensu stricto) and consists of
about six species (Fei and Ye, 2000b; Fu et al., 2001;
Song et al., 2001). The western (Iran and Afganistan)
group includes two or three species (Stock, 1999), and
may be allocated to Paradactylodon.
Various authors suggested several configurations of
evolutionary relationships among hynobiids. For
instance, based on reproductive biology characters,
Thom (1969) proposed to recognize two families:
Ranodontidae, with the genus Ranodon only, and
Hynobiidae, with remaining genera. Using a set of mor-
phological and biological data, Zhao and Hu (1984) sep-
arated two "natural" groups among Chinese species: the
Hynobius group with predominantly terrestrial species
(Hynobius and Salamandrella ), and the Ranodon group
with predominantly aquatic inhabitants ( Ranodon ,
Onychodactylus , Batrachuperus , and Liua). Later, Zhao
and Zhang (1985) assigned the genus Pachyhynobius to
a third group. Combining morphological characters and
mitochondrial DNA data, Larson and Dimmick (1993)
found the closest relationships between the genera
Salamandrella and Hynobius , thus confirming the tradi-
tional acceptance of the similarity of these taxa.
However, the genus Onychodactylus was more closely
related to that lineage, whereas Batrachuperus (the east-
ern group) proved to be more distant. Recently, Fei and
Ye (2000a) have erected a new subfamily for the newly
discovered Protohynobius puxiongensis, whereas all
other hynobiids were allocated to another subfamily.
Genome size data are not in agreement with all
these suggestions, which did not recognize separate
position of the genus Onychodactylus. Apart from the
largest genome size, distincton of the genus was also
supported by morphological and karyological data
(Morescalchi et al., 1979; Olmo, 1983; Kohno et al.,
1991; Iizuka, Yazawa, 1994; Kuro-o et al., 2000;
Litvinchuk and Borkin, 2003).
5) Taxonomic considerations
Based on the intraspecific analysis, Bassarukin and
Borkin (1984), and Borkin (1994) outlined the peculiar-
ities of Salamandrella keyserlingii from the southern
part of the Russian Far East. Moreover, these authors
suggested that local populations would be considered as
a geographic race of the species (the species type terri-
tory is the Kultuk Village, Baikal Lake, Irkutsk
Province, Russia; restricted by Borkin, 1994). Indeed,
the "Euro-Siberian" and "Primorsky" groups of popula-
tions are different in allozymes (Litvinchuk et al.,
2001a), in some morphological characters (Ostashko,
1981; Bassarukin and Borkin, 1984; Borkin, 1994;
Litvinchuk and Borkin, 2003), in breeding sites
(Kuzmin, 1990), and in the shape of egg sacs and time
of larval development (Korotkov, 1977; Bassarukin and
Borkin, 1984; Sapozhnikov, 1990; Vorobyeva et al.,
1999). Therefore, geographic differences in genome size
revealed by us are in concert with differences in other
characters. Based on a concordance of various charac-
ters, including genome size, we would recognize a dis-
tinct status of the "Primorsky" samples, at least, of a sub-
specific rank. Formerly, Nikolsky (1906) and Dybowski
(1928) have coined the names Salamandrella keyser-
lingii var. tridactyla and Salamandrella keyserlingii var.
kalinowskiana, respectively, for animals from the
Russian Far East. Obviously, the first name has the pri-
ority. Therefore, populations from Russian Far East
(Primorsky Territory) should be named Salamandrella
keyserlingii tridactyla Nikolsky, 1906.
The range of Ranodon sibiricus is quite limited.
Nevertheless, it consists of several semi-isolated areas
(Brushko et al., 1988; Kuzmin et al., 1998; our data).
The populations from the upper parts of Borokhudzir
and Oy-Saz Rivers are separated from each other by a
mountain range. Therefore, it is not surprising that the
genome size difference (RD) between them is relatively
large (2.2%). However, geographical variation in the
species is poorly studied, and so the taxonomic value of
that difference is still unclear.
Vol. 10, p. 289
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Acknowledgments
We thank A. G. Borissovsky (Izhevsk), V. G. Ishchenko
(Ekaterinburg), V. N. Kuranova (Tomsk), J. C. Lacroax
(Paris), I. V. Maslova (Spassk-Dal'ny), N. Panfilova
(Almaty), M. V. Pestov (Nizhniy Novgorod), G. P.
Sapozhnikov (Vilnus), V. T. Sedalishchev (Yakutsk), E.
I. Vorobyeva (Moscow), Y. Zhuravlyev (Almaty), and
the staff of Almaty and Moscow Zoo terraria for help us
in the field or providing animals. We also thank
Theodore Papenfuss (Berkeley) for valuable comments
and English corrections of the earlier version of the
paper. The research was funded by the INTAS (grant no
97-11909), the Russian Foundation for Basic Research
(the grant No. 02-04-49631), and the Federal State
Program "Integration" (the grant No. E-0121).
Literature Cited
Azumi, J., and M. Sasaki. 1971. Karyotypes of
Hynobius retardatus Dunn and Hynobius
nigrescens Strineger. Chromosome Information
Service 12:31-32.
Bachmann, K. 1972. Nuclear DNA and developmental
rate in frogs. Quarterly Journal of Florida Academy
of Sciences 35:227-23 1 .
Bachmann, K. and M. Nishioka. 1978. Genome size and
nuclear size in Palaearctic frogs ( Rana ). Copeia
1978:225-229.
Bassarukin, A. M., and L. J. Borkin. 1984. Distribution,
ecology and morphological variability of the
Siberian Salamander, Hynobius keyserlingii, of the
Sakhalin Island. Pp. 12-54. In L. J. Borkin (ed.),
Ecology and Faunistics of Amphibians and Reptiles
of the USSR and Adjacent Countries. Proceedings
of the Zoological Institute, Leningrad, 124 (In
Russian).
Berman, D. I. 1996. Amphibia and Reptilia. Pp. 62-66.
In: Vertebrate Animals of North-East Russia.
Dalnauka, Vladivostok. (In Russian).
Bianchi, N. O., C. Redi, C. Garagna, E. Capanna, and M.
G. Manfredi-Romanini. 1983. Evolution of the
genome size in Akodon (Rodentia, Cricetidae).
Journal of Molecular Evolution 19:362-370.
Birstein, V. J., A. I. Poletaev, and B. F. Goncharov. 1993.
DNA content in Eurasian sturgeon species deter-
mined by flow cytometry. Cytometry 14:377-383.
Borkin, L. J. 1994. Systematics. Pp. 54-80. In E. I.
Vorobyeva (ed.), The Siberian Newt
( Salamandrella keyserlingii Dibowski, 1870).
Zoogeography, Systematics, Morphology. Nauka,
Moskow. (In Russian).
Borkin, L. J. 1998. [Amphibians]. Pp. 19-174. In:
Amphibians and Reptiles. The Encyclopaedia of
Nature of Russia. ABF, Moscow. (In Russian).
Borkin, L. J. 1999. Distribution of amphibians in North
Africa, Europe, Western Asia, and the former Soviet
Union. Pp 329-420. In W. E. Duellman (ed.),
Patterns of Distribution of Amphibians: a Global
Perspective. The Johns Hopkins University Press,
Baltimore.
Borkin, L. J., I. A. Caune, E. M. Pisanetz, and J. M.
Rosanov. 1986. Karyotype and genome size in the
Bufo viridis group. Pp. 137-142. In Z. Rocek (ed.),
Studies in Herpetology, Prague.
Borkin, L. J., V. K. Eremchenko, N. Helfenberger, A. M.
Panfilov, and J. M. Rosanov. 2001a. On the distri-
bution of diploid, triploid, and tetraploid green
toads ( Bufo viridis complex) in south-eastern
Kazakhstan. Russian Journal of Herpetology
8(l):45-53.
Borkin, L. J., S. N. Litvinchuk, E. I. Mannapova, M. V.
Pestov, and J. M. Rosanov. 2002. The distribution of
green frogs {Rana esculent a complex) in Nizhy
Novgorod Province, central European Russia.
Russian Journal of Herpetology 9(3): 195-208.
Borkin, L. J., S. N. Litvinchuk, and J. M. Rosanov. 1996.
Spontaneous triploidy in the crested newt, Triturus
cristatus (Salamandridae). Russian Journal of
Herpetology 3(2): 152- 156.
Borkin, L. J., S. N. Litvinchuk, J. M. Rosanov, M. D.
Khalturin, G. A. Lada, A. G. Borissovsky, A. I.
Faizulin, I. M. Kotserzhinskaya, R. V. Novitsky, and
A. B. Rushin. 2003. New data on the distribution of
two cryptic forms of the common spadefoot toad
(Pelobates fuscus ) in eastern Europe. Russian
Journal of Herpetology 1 0(2): 1 15-122.
Borkin, L. J., S. N. Litvinchuk, J. M. Rosanov, and K. D.
Milto. 2001b. Cryptic speciation in Pelobates fus-
cus (Anura, Pelobatidae): evidence from DNA flow
cytometry. Amphibia-Reptilia 22(4):387-396.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 290
Borkin, L. J., A. E. Vinogradov, J. M. Rosanov, and I. A.
Caune. 1987. Hemiclonal inheritance in the hybri-
dogenetic complex Rana esculenta : evidence from
DNA flow cytometry. Doklady Akademii Nauk
SSSR 295(5):1261-1264. (In Russian).
Brushko, Z. K., R. A. Kubykin, and S. R Narbaeva.
1988. Recent distribution of Siberian salamander
Ranodon sibiricus (Amphibia, Hynobiidae) in
Dzungar Alatau. Zoologichesky Zhumal, Moscow
67:1753-1756. (In Russian).
Brushko, Z. K., and S. P. Narbaeva. 1988. Breeding biol-
ogy of Semirechensk salamander in valley of River
Borokhudzir (South-East Kazakhstan). Ekologia,
Sverdlovsk 2:45-49. (In Russian).
Chipman, A. D., O. Khaner, A. Haas, and E. Tchemov.
2001. The evolution of genome size: what can be
learned from anuran development? Journal of
Experimental Zoology 291:365-374.
Dybowski, B. 1928 [1927]. Uber die Urodelen
Ostsibiriens. Bulletin de l'Academie Polonaise des
Sciences et des Lettres Classe des Sciences
Mathematiques et Naturelles, Serie B: Sciences
Naturelles, Cracovie 8/10:1073-1081.
Duellman, W. E., and L. Trueb. 1986. Biology of
Amphibians. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.
Fei, L. and C. Ye. 2000a. A new hynobiid subfamily with
a new genus and new species of Hynobiidae
(Amphibia: Caudata) from West China. Cultum
Herpetologica Sinica 8:64-70.
Fei, L. and C. Ye. 2000b. The colour handbook of the
amphibians of Sichuan. (In Chinese).
Fu, J., Y. Wang, X. Zeng, Z. Liu, and Y. Zheng.
2001. Genetic diversity of eastern Batrachuperus
(Caudata; Hynobiidae). Copeia 2001:1100-1105.
Goin, O. B., C. J. Goin, and K. Bachmann. 1968. DNA
and amphibian life history. Copeia 1968:532-540.
Grafodatsky, A. S. and O. V. Grigoryev. 1982. [Unique
type of distribution of structural heterochromatine
in chromosomes and nuclei of spermatozoids in the
Siberian salamander Hynobius keyserlingii
(Urodela, Amphibia)]. Doklady Akademii Nauk
USSR, Moscow 267:957-958. (In Russian).
Gregory, T. R. 2001a. Animal Genome Size Database.
http://www.genomesize.com.
Gregory, T. R. 2001b. Coincidence, coevolution, or cau-
sation? DNA content, cell size, and the C-value
enigma. Biological Review 76:65-101.
Gregory, T. R. 2001c. The bigger the C-value, the larger
the cell: genome size and red blood cell size in ver-
tebrates. Blood cells, Molecules, and Diseases
27:830-843.
Gregory, T. R. 2002. Genome size and developmental
complexity. Genetica 115:131-146.
Gregory, T. R. 2003. Variation across amphibian species
in the size of the nuclear genome supports a plural-
istic, hierarchical approach to the C-value enigma.
Biological Journal of Linnean Society 79:329-339.
Griffin, P. C., and V. A. Solkin. 1995. Ecology and con-
servation of Onychodactylus fischeri (Caudata,
Hynobiidae) in the Russian Far East. Asiatic
Herpetological Research 6:114-119.
Griffith, O. L., G. E. Moodie, and A. Civetta. 2003.
Genome size and longevity in fish. Experimental
Gerontology 38:333-337.
Hayase, N. and S. Yamane. 1982. [Life history during
the aquatic life period of a salamander,
Onychodactylus japonicus (Houttuyn), at Mts.
Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan]. Japanese Journal of
Ecology 32(2):395-403. (In Japanese).
Homer, H. A., and H. C. Macgregor. 1983. C value and
cell volume: their significance in the evolution and
development of amphibians. Journal of Cell Science
63:135-146.
Iizuka. K., and S. Yazawa. 1994. The karyotype, C-
bands and AgN03 bands of a lungless salamander
from Korea: Onychodactylus fischeri (Boulenger)
(Amphibia, Urodela). Experientia 50:171-175.
Ishchenko, V. G., L. B. Godina, A. M. Bassarukin, V. N.
Kuranova, and V. T. Tagirova. 1995a. Reproduction.
Pp. 86-102. In E. I. Vorobyeva (ed.), The Siberian
Newt ( Salamandrella keyserlingii Dibowski, 1 870).
Ecology, Behaviour, Conservation. Nauka,
Moskow. (In Russian).
Vol. 10, p. 291
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Ishchenko, V. G., A. V. Ledentsov, L. B. Godina, and S.
L. Kuzmin. 1995b. [Development and growth], Pp.
103-124. In E. I. Vorobyeva (ed.), The Siberian
Newt ( Salamandrella keyserlingii Dibowski, 1870).
Ecology, Behavior, Conservation. Nauka, Moskow.
(In Russian).
Iwasaki, F. and M. Wakahara. 1999. Adaptable larval life
histories in different populations of the salamander,
Hynobius retardatus, living in various habitats.
Zoological Science 16:667-674.
Iwasawa, H. and J. Kera. 1980. Stages of normal devel-
opment of Onychodactylus fischeri. Japanese
Journal of Herpetology 8:73-89. (In Japanese).
Jockusch, E. L. 1997. An evolutionary correlate of
genome size change in plethodontid salamanders.
Proceedings of Royal Society London B 264:597-
604.
Johnston, O. W., P. M. Utter, and P. S. Rabinovitch.
1987. Interspecific differences in salmonid cellular
DNA identified by flow cytometry. Copeia
1987:1001-1009.
Khalturin, M. D., S. N. Litvinchuk, L. J. Borkin, J. M.
Rosanov, and K. D. Milto. 2003. Genetic variation
in two cryptic forms of the common spadefoot toad
Pelobates fuscus (Pelobatidae, Anura, Amphibia)
differing in genome size. Tsitologia, St. Petersburg
45(3):308-323. (In Russian).
Kohno, S., M. Kuro-o, C. Ikebe, R. Katakura, Y.
Izumisawa, T. Yamamoto, H. Y. Lee, and S. Y. Yang.
1987. Banding karyotype of Korean salamander:
Hynobius leechii Boulenger. Zoological Science
4:81-86.
Kohno, S., M. Kuro-o, and C. Ikebe. 1991.
Cytogeneticsand evolution of hynobiid salaman-
ders. Pp. 67-88. In D. M. Green, and S. K. Sessions
(eds.), Amphibian Cytogenetics and Evolution,
Academic Press, Inc., San Diego.
Korotkov, Y. M. 1977. A contribution to the ecology of
Onychodactylus fischeri and Hynobius keyserlingii
in Primorsky District. Zoologichesky Zhurnal,
Moscow 56:1258-1260. (In Russian).
Kuro-o, M., C. Ikebe, and S. Kohno. 1987. Cytogenetic
studies of Hynobiidae (Urodela). VI. R-banding
patterns in five pond-type Hynobius from Korea
and Japan. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics 44:69-
75.
Kuro-o, M., Y. Hasegawa, C. Ikebe, G. Wu, X. Zeng, S.
Kohno, and Y. Obara. 2000. Turtle biodiversity:
global data for the global community [correct title:
Molecular cytogenetic approach to deduction of
phylogenetic relationships in hynobiid salaman-
ders]. Pp. 97-98 Fourth Asian Herpetological
Conference, Chendu. [Abstract],
Kuzmin, S. L. 1990. Feeding of sympatric species
Hynobiidae in the Primorye. Zoologichesky
Zhumal, Moscow 69:71-75. (In Russian).
Kuzmin, S. L. 1995. The Clawed Salamanders of Asia:
Genus Onychodactylus ; Biology, Distribution and
Conservation. Westarp-Wiss., Magdeburg. (Die
Neue Brehm-Biicherei; Bd. 622).
Kuzmin, S. L. 1999. The Amphibians of the Former
Soviet Union (Vol. I). Pensoft, Sofia-Moscow.
Kuzmin, S. L., R. A. Kubykin, B. Thiesmeier, and H.
Greven. 1998. The distribution of the Semirechensk
salamander ( Ranodon sibiricus ): a historical per-
spective. Advances in Amphibian Research in the
Former Soviet Union, Moscow 3:1-20.
Kuzmin, S. L. and B. Thismeier. 2001. Mountain sala-
manders of the genus Ranodon. Advances in
Amphibian Research in the Former Soviet Union,
Moscow 6:1-184.
Larson, A. and W. W. Dimmick. 1993. Phylogenetic
relationships of the salamander families: an analysis
of congruence among morphological and molecular
characters. Herpetological Monographs 7:77-93.
Lebedkina, N. S. 1964. The development of the dermal
bones of the basement of the scull in Urodela
(Hynobiidae). Pp. 75-172. In S. K. Krasovsky (ed.),
Morphology of Vertebrates, Proceedings of the
Zoological Institute, Leningrad 33. (In Russian).
Licht, L. E. and L. A. Lowcock. 1991. Genome size and
metabolic rate in salamanders. Comparative
Biochemistry and Physiology 100B(l):83-92.
Litvinchuk, S. N. and L. J. Borkin. 2003. Variation in
number of trunk vertebrae and in count of costal
grooves in salamanders of the family Hynobiidae.
Contributions to Zoology 72(1) (in press).
Litvinchuk, S. N., L. J. Borkin, G. DCukic, M. L.
Kalezic, M. D. Khalturin, and J. M. Rosanov. 1999.
Taxonomic status of Triturus karelinii on the
Balkans, with some comments about other crested
2004
Vol. 10, p. 292
newts taxa. Russian Journal of Herpetology
6:153-163.
Litvinchuk, S. N., L. J. Borkin, and J. M. Rosanov. 2003.
On distribution of and hybridization between the
newts Triturus vulgaris and T. montandoni in west-
ern Ukraine. Alytes 20(3-4): 161-168.
Litvinchuk, S. N., J. M. Rosanov, and L. J. Borkin. 1997.
A contact zone between the newts Triturus cristatus
and Triturus dobrogicus in the Ukrainian
Transcarpathians: distribution and genome size
variation. Pp. 229-235. In W. Bohme, W. Bischoff,
and T. Ziegler (eds.), Herpetologia Bonnensis. Soc.
Europ. Herpet., Bonn.
Litvinchuk, S. N., J. M. Rosanov, and L. J. Borkin. 1998.
A case of natural triploidy in a smooth newt Triturus
vulgaris (Linnaeus, 1758), from Russia (Caudata:
Salamandridae). Herpetozoa 1 l(l/2):93-95.
Litvinchuk, S. N., J. M. Rosanov and L. J. Borkin.
2001a. Natural autotriploidy in the Danube newt,
Triturus dobrogicus (Salamandridae). Russian
Journal of Herpetology 8:74-76.
Litvinchuk, S. N., J. M. Rosanov, L. J. Borkin, M. D.
Khalturin, B. I. Timofeev, G. DDukic, M. L. Kalezic.
2001b. Genome size and some problems of urode-
lan systematics (Salamandridae and Hynobiidae).
Pp. 168-170. In The Problems of Herpetology.
Pushchino-Moscow. (In Russian).
Lizana, M., R. Marquez, R. Martin-Sanchez, J. Ciudad,
A. Lopez, and A. Orfao. 2000. Determination of
cellular DNA content of Iberian salamanders by
flow cytometry. Amphibia- Reptilia 2 1 (4):4 11-418.
Matsui, M., T. Sato, S. Tanabe, and T. Hayashi. 1992.
Electrophoretic analyses of systematic relationships
and status of two hynobiid salamanders from
Hokkaido (Amphibia: Caudata). Herpetologica
48:408-416.
MacCulloch, R. D., D. E. Upton, and R. W. Murphy.
1996. Trends in nuclear DNA content among
amphibians and reptiles. Comparative Biochemistry
and Physiology 1 1 3B:60 1-605.
Mazin, A. L. 1978. Genome size in some Caudata and
Anura of the Far East. Pp. 20-21. In Gerpetofauna
Dalnego Vostoka i Sibiri, Vladivostok. (In Russian).
Mikamo, K. 1956. Some observations on sex determina-
tion in a salamander, Hynobius retardatus, with ref-
erence to experiments on the effects of overripeness
of eggs. Journal of Faculty of Science, Hokkaido
University, Series 6, Zoology 12:282-295.
Mizuno, S., S. Tajima, Y. Saitoh, K. Mori, H. Ono, M.
Tone, and T. Mihira. 1995. Variation of repetitive
DNA and its phylogenetic relation in Hynobiidae
(Caudata). Journal of Heredity 86(2): 1 14-20.
Morescalchi, A., G. Odiema, and E. Olmo. 1979.
Karyology of the primitive salamanders, family
Hynobiidae. Experientia 35:1434-1436.
Murphy, R. W., L. A. Lowcock, C. Smith, I. S. Darevsky,
N. Orlov, R. D. MacCulloch, and D. E. Upton.
1997. Flow cytometry in biodiversity surveys:
methods, utility, and constraints. Amphibia-Reptilia
1 8(1): 1-13.
Nevo, E., and A. Beiles. 1991. Genetic diversity and
ecological heterogeneity in amphibian evolution.
Copeia 1991:565-592.
Nikolsky, A. M. 1906[ 1905]. Reptiles and amphibians of
the Russian Empire. Zapiski Imperatorskoy
Akademii Nauk, Seria Physika i Mathematika
17(1): 1-518.
Oeldorf, E., M. Nishioka, and K. Bachmann. 1978.
Nuclear DNA amounts and developmental rate in
holarctic anura. Journal of Zoology, Systematics
and Evolutionary Research 16:216-224.
Olmo, E. 1973. Quantative variations in the nuclear
DNA and phylogenesis of the Amphibia.
Caryologia 26:43-68.
Olmo, E. 1983. Nucleotype and cell size in vertebrates:
a review. Basic Applications of Histochemistry
27:227-256.
Olmo, E., and A. Morescalchi. 1975. Evolution of the
genome and cell size in salamanders. Experientia
3 1(7):804-806.
Ostashko, N. G. 1981. Geographical variation in the
Siberian salamander {Hynobius keyserlingii). Pp.
98. In I. S. Darevsky (ed.), The Problems of
Herpetology. Nauka, Leningrad. (In Russian).
Pagel, M. and R.A. Jonstone. 1992. Variation across
species in the size of the nuclear genome supports
the junk-DNA explanation for the C-value paradox.
Vol. 10, p. 293
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Proceedings of Royal Society London B Biological
Science 249:1 19-124.
Rosanov, J. M., and A. E. Vinogradov. 1998. Precise
DNA cytometry: investigation of individual vari
ability in animal genome size. Tsitologiya, St.
Petersburg 40:792-800. (In Russian).
Reilly, S. M. 1983. The biology of the high altitude sal-
amander Batrachuperus mustersi from
Afghanistan. Journal of Herpetology 7:1-9.
Roth, G., J. Blanke, and D. B. Wake. 1994. Cell size pr-
edicts morphological complexity in the brains of
frogs and salamanders. Proceedings of National
Academy of Science, USA 91:4796-4800.
Sapozhnikov, G. P. 1990. Some peculiarities of larval
development and growth of Salamandrella keyser-
lingii. Pp. 75-90. In A. V. Salmanov, and I. S.
Darevsky (eds.), Investigations on Vertebrates
Zoology. Proceedings of the Zoological Institute,
Leningrad, 213. (In Russian).
Sasaki, M. 1924. On a Japanese salamander, in lake
Kuttarush, which propagates like the axolotl.
Journal of College Agriculture of Hokkaido
Imperial University Sapporo 15:1-36.
Sessions, S. K. and A. Larson. 1987. Developmental
correlates of genome size in plethodontid salaman-
ders and their implications for genome evolution.
Evolution 41:1239-1251.
Seto, T., M. Matsui, and E. Kawakami. 1986. The
Giemsa stained and C-banded karyotypes of
Hynobius tsuensis and H. leechii (Amphibia,
Urodela). Japanese Journal of Herpetology 11:137-
144.
Schmid, M., W. Feichtinger, C. Steinlein, A. Rupprecht,
T. Haaf, and H. Kaiser. 2002. Chromosome banding
in Amphibia. XXIII. Giant W sex chromosomes and
extremely small genomes in Eleutherodactylus
euphronides and Eleutherodactylus shrevei (Anura,
Leptodactylidae). Cytogenetics and Genome
Research 97:81-94.
Shakhbazov, V. G., and A. V. Gapchenko. 1990.
Unspecific resistance and DNA content in amphib-
ian genomes. Doklady Akademii Nauk USSR
314:971-975. (In Russian).
Sharbel, T. F., J. Bonin, L. A. Lowcock, and D. M.
Green. 1995. Partial genetic compatibility and uni
directional hybridization in syntopic populations of
the salamanders Desmognathus fuscus and D.
ochrophaeus. Copeia 1995(2):466-469.
Sharbel, T. F., L. A. Lowcock, and R. W. Murphy. 1997.
Flow cytometric analysis of amphibian population
composition. Pp. 78-86. In D. M. Green (ed.),
Amphibians decline: Canadian studies of a global
problem.
Smirina, E. M., I. A. Serbinova, and A. N. Makarov.
1994. Some complicated cases of age determination
using the annual layers of bones in amphibians (at
the example of long-tailed salamander
Onychodactylus fischeri (Amphibia, Hynobiidae).
Zoologichesky Zhumal, Moscow 73:72-81. (In
Russian).
Song, M., X. Zeng, G. Wu, Z. Liu, and J. Fu. 2001. A
new species of Batrachuperus from Northwestern
China. Asiatic Herpetogical Research 9:6-8.
Stock, M. 1999. On the biology and the taxonomic sta-
tus of Batrachuperus gorganensis Clergue-Gazeau
et Thom, 1979 based on topotypic specimens
Amphibia: Caudata: Hynobiidae). Zoologische
Abhandlungen Staatliches Museum fur Tierkunde
Dresden 50:217-241.
Thomson, K. S. and K. Muraszko. 1978. Estimation of
cell size and DNA content in fossil fishes and
amphibians. Journal of Experimental Zoology
205(1):3 15-320.
Thom, R. 1969 [1968]. Les Salamandres d'Europe,
d'Asie et d'Affique du Nord. Paul Lechevalier,
Paris.
Van't Hoff, J. and A.H. Sparrow. 1963. A relationship
between DNA content, nuclear volume, and mini-
mum mitotic cycle time. Proceedings of National
Academy of Science USA 49:897-902.
Vinogradov, A. E. 1998. Genome size and GC-percent in
vertebrates as detenu ined by How cytometry: the
triangular relationship. Cytometry 31:100-109.
Vinogradov, A.E. 1999. Genome in toto. Genome
42:361-362.
Vinogradov, A. E. and L. J. Borkin. 1993. Allometry of
base pair specific-DNA contents in Tetrapoda.
Hereditas 118:155-163.
2004
Vol. 10, p. 294
Vinogradov, A. E., L. J. Borkin, R. Gunther, and J. M.
Rosanov. 1990. Genome elimination in diploid and
triploid Rana esculenta males: cytological evidence
from DNA flow cytometry. Genome 33:619-627.
Vladychenskaya, N. S., O. S. Kedrova, and N. B. Petrov.
1988. Molecular characteristics of the genome in
Hynobius keyserlingii. Zhumal Evolyutsionnoy
Biokhimii i Fiziologii 24: 471-476. (In Russian).
Vorobyeva, E. I., T. P. Antipenkova, and J. R. Hinchliffe.
1999. The peculiarities of limbs development from
Far East population of the Siberian Newt
(i Salamandrella keyserlingii , Hynobiidae, Caudata).
Doklady Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk 364:130-133.
(In Russian).
Zhao, E., and Q. Flu. 1984. Studies of Chinese Tailed
Amphibians. Sichuan Science and Technology
Publishing House, Chengdu (In Chinese). 1988,
Oxford, Society for the Study of Amphibians and
Reptiles (English version).
Zhao, E., and F. Zhang. 1985. The aquatic evolution of
Hynobiidae of China, with descriptions of a new
genus and a new species from Western Anhui. Acta
Herpetologica Sinica 4:36-40. (In Chinese).
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, pp. 295-297
Anomalous (?) Nocturnal Feeding by the Agamid Lizard Calotes emma in
Northeastern Thailand
William H. Schaedla
Department of Biology, Arizona State University, RO. Box 871501 Tempe, Arizona 85287-1501, U.S.A.
E-mail: schaedla@asu.edu
Abstract. - I observed feeding by the Agamid lizard Calotes emma during the early part of the Thai monsoon season.
During this period, one individual took advantage of swarming termite reproductives and fed noctumally. Nocturnal
activity has not been reported for this genus. The lizard's behavior may have resulted from conditions created by arti-
ficial lighting. Alternately, it may constitute a normal response to a rich annually-available food resource.
Key words. - Calotes emma, feeding, termites, nocturnal,
Introduction
Agamid lizards belonging to the genus Calotes are
widely distributed throughout South and Southeast Asia.
They are characterized by semi-arboreal or arboreal
behavior, strongly diurnal activity patterns, and insectiv-
orous diets (Erdelen, 1988; Gunther, 1864; Subba Rao
1970, 1975; and Subba Rao and Rajabai, 1972).
Calotes emma is a typical member of the genus.
The species occurs from Assam through Yunnan in the
north, and Peninsular Thailand in the south. It prefers
moist forested habitat and is arboreal to semi-arboreal it
its habits (Gunther, 1 864). Here I report observations of
C. emma feeding at night in a manner apparently con-
trary to norms for the genus.
Methods
This study took place at the Sakaerat Environmental
Research Station. Sakaerat is a scientific and education-
al facility located in Northeastern Thailand at 14° 30.46'
N Latitude by 101° 55.92' E Longitude. The station
grounds cover approximately 80 km2.
Small and medium-sized wildlife is plentiful in the
area. As of this writing, 70 species of mammals, 50
species of birds, and 25 species of amphibians have been
recorded from Sakaerat. Reptile fauna is also abundant
-82 species are known to occur (Lawanyawatna and
Schaedla, 2000). Of the reptiles, C. emma is among the
most common because of the station's abundant forest
cover.
Seasonal (monsoonal) and perennial dipterocarp
forests comprise the bulk of Sakaerat's habitats. I
worked specifically in an area of Dry Evergreen Forest,
which is a Dipterocarp mosaic containing other floral
components. It is a four storied forest. The upper story
extends from 2 1 to 40 m in height and consists mostly of
Hopea ferrea , H. odorata, Shorea sericeiflora , and
atypical behavior.
Irvingia malayana. The middle story ranges from 15 to
20 m in height and contains Hydrocarpus ilicifolius,
Memocylon ovatum, and Walsura trichostemnon. The
lower story is between 4 and 24 m in height and is char-
acterized by Baccaurea sapida, Apodytes dimidiate, and
Olea salicifolia. Undergrowth is less than 4 m from the
ground, leafy, and composed mainly of Ardisia,
Canthium, and Clausena.
Average humidity at Sakaerat runs about 76% over
the course of the year. Average annual precipitation is
1,222 millimeters, and average annual temperature is
26°C. March is the hottest month with a maximum
recorded high of 37°C. January is the coolest with a
minimum recorded low of 8°C. Sakaerat generally
experiences a 3.5 month long rainy season that lasts
from early June through mid September. Conversely,
rainfall is rare from December through February
(Tongyai, 1980).
I made behavioral observations of Sakaerat's
Calotes emma on the evenings of 7, 10, and 12 June,
2001. These dates followed the onset of the local mon-
soon season, but were not monsoon days themselves.
Weather conditions were overcast, but there was no
heavy or sustained precipitation. Rainfall was light and
intermittent, accompanied by occasional lightning.
Ambient temperature was moderate, ranging from 27° to
30°C.
My observations took place from approximately
6:00 PM (dusk) to 9:00 PM. I watched from an area in
a semi-secluded part of the research station. My vantage
was the front porch of a bungalow near Sakaerat's sta-
tion headquarters, but offset in the forest and away from
the main complex of office, visitor's center, cafeteria,
and general housing. This area is dimly lit by two over-
head fluorescent lights attached to the sides of buildings.
These lights attract large numbers of insects, especially
during seasonal monsoon periods. In particular, termite
alates (winged reproductives) were present in high num-
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 296
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
bers on the evenings I observed. Large swarms of
Odontotermes sp. and Macrotermes sp. clouded the
local area and eventually dropped to the ground.
When termites fell to the ground, 1 observed a sin-
gle C. emma feeding them. The lizard was present all
three rainless nights, and seemed unperturbed by my
presence. It was there from dusk, or before, to nearly
9:00 PM on all three evenings. It was active, and its
behavior was restricted to the terrestrial environment. It
did not climb nearby trees or the sides of wooden build-
ings. All of its movements were directed; it displayed
no signs of disorientation in the relative darkness of its
surroundings. On the contrary, it focused on the termite
alates and fed vigorously on them as they landed.
On June 10, I captured the lizard to verily its iden-
tity as C. emma. It had been correctly identified and was
a mature female. Her stomach was distended from ter-
mite consumption, but she was not visibly gravid with
eggs.
In addition to the lizard, other predators feeding on
the termite alates included toads (Bufo melanostictus),
geckoes ( Cyrtodactylus spp .), and centipedes
(Scolopendr amorpha).
Discussion
Little is known about the exact feeding preferences of C.
emma. However, some indication of its diet might be
inferred from studies of a closely related arboreal
species. Subba Rao (1972) found that C. nemoricola in
India fed mostly on ants, while Sitana ponticeriana, an
unrelated ground-dwelling lizard, fed on termites. In
another study he found that C. nemoricola consumed a
wide variety of invertebrates ranging from beetles, to
gastropods, to earthworms. Analysis of gut contents
showed a predominance of ants but no termites. He also
noted a distinct absence of flying insects in the lizards'
stomachs (Subba Rao, 1975). Hence, feeding on winged
termites by C. emma may represent a departure from its
normal dietary habits.
Likewise, nocturnal feeding has not been reported
in the literature surrounding Calotes. In fact, members
of the genus are usually active only during the day
(Erdelen, 1988; Gunther, 1864; Subba Rao 1970, 1975;
and Subba Rao and Rajabai, 1972). C. emma at Sakaerat
is decidedly diurnal in its habits. At night they tend to
sleep on the ends of low-hanging tree branches.
Spotlighting does not wake them and they can be cap-
tured easily by anyone walking through the forest with a
headlamp. I have worked at Sakaerat for three years,
and, with the exception of the observations reported
herein, I have never seen them active at night.
Calotes is apparently physiologically predisposed
towards diurnal activity. Light has a positive affect on
both the pituitary and the hypothalmamo-neuro secreto-
ry systems of C. versicolor (Banerjee, 1972). However,
Kar (1987) found that day length (photoperiod) played a
less important role than ambient temperature in scale
regeneration by C. versicolor. He speculated this hap-
pens because the lizards' thyroid activity is elevated by
heat, rather than light.
Evening temperatures were warm on the nights I
made my observations. The lizard I observed may have
been able to extend her activity because of this. It is also
possible that the lack of sunlight was mitigated by the
presence of overhead florescent lights (albeit dim). My
subject may simply have been disrupted from its normal
circadian routine by the local environment. Some sup-
port for this possibility comes for another observational
study. Subba Rao et al. (1984) noted that abrupt changes
in light intensity, temperature, and relative humidity dur-
ing a total solar eclipse actually stimulated activity in C.
versicolor.
Of course, the feeding I observed may have been
part of C. emma' s normal behavioral regime. Termite
alates constitute a rich, but seasonally discrete food
source, induced by the onset of the monsoons. They are
available in great numbers at specific times of the year,
and they attract a wide variety of predators, including
retiles. It is therefore possible that C. emma takes advan-
tage of the bonanza via seasonal changes in behavior.
Whatever the case, nocturnal feeding by C. emma is
unusual and unreported. Even if not anomalous it
deserves future attention.
Literature Cited
Banerjee, S. K. 1973. Effect of light and darkness on the
hypothaamo-neurohypophyseal system of the gar-
den lizard, Calotes versicolor. Experientia
29(6):7 13-714.
Erdelen, W. 1988. Population dynamics and dispersal in
three species of Agamid lizards in Sri lanka: Calotes
calotes , C. versicolor , and C. nigrilabris. Journal of
Herpetology 22(l):42-52.
Gunther, A. C. L. 1864. The reptiles of British India.
Robert Hardwick, London.
Kar, A. 1987. Relative importance of temperature and
photoperiod on the physiology of Indian garden
lizard, Calotes versicolor. Current Science
56(10):497-499.
Lawantayana K. and W. H. Schaedla. 2000. A Brief
Overview of the Sakaerat Environmental Research
Station in Thailand. Tigerpaper 27(2):29-32.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 297
Pomprasertchai, K. and D. Disbanjong 1998. Changes in
the forest area at Sakaerat Environmental Research
Station (In Thai). Thai government publication.
Subba Rao, M. V. 1975. Studies on the food and feeding
behaviour of the Agamid garden lizard Calotes ver-
sicolor. British Journal of Herpetology 5(4):467-
470.
Subba Rao, M. V. 1970. Studies on the biology of two
selected lizards of Tirupati. British Journal of
Herpetology 4:151-154.
Subba Rao, M.V. and B. S. Rajabai, 1972. Ecological
aspects of the Agamid lizards Sitana ponticeriana
and Calotes nemoricola in India. Herpetologica
28:285-289.
Subba Rao, M. V., A Eswar, and K. Kameswara Rao,
1984. Effect of pre, during, and post total solar
eclipse on the activity pattern of an Agamid garden
lizard, Calotes versicolor , Daudin. Journal of
Environmental Biology 5(3): 197-201.
Tongyai, M. L. P. 1980. The Sakaerat Environmental
Research Station, Its role as a knowledge base for
the determination of forest lands conservation poli-
cies for establishing maximum sustained yields on
forest resources. Thai government publication.
Karyological Studies on Amphibians in China
Yuhua Yang
Molecular Biology Labortary, Department of Bioengineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610064, R.P.China
Abstract. - Since 1978, 79 species of anurans have been studied karyotypically using conventional Giemsa staining
and various banding techniques. The chromosome numbers are 2n=22-64 and the karyotypes are variable. The homo-
morphic and heteromorphic sex chromosomes of some species have been identified. The mitotic and meiotic chromo-
somes of 14 species in two families of Urodela have also been investigated. The family Hynobiidae is karyotypical-
ly more primitive than the family Salamandridae.
Key words. - Karyology, amphibian, Anura, Urodela.
Introduction
Karyological studies of amphibians in China were pio-
neeered by two scholars. In 1952, famous cytologist T.
C. Hsu, an American of Chinese origin, developed the
hypotonic technique for chromosome separation and
observation. In 1956, cytogeneticist J. H. Tjio, a Swede
of Chinese origin, reported that the number of human
chromosomes is 46, not 48. In China, karyological stud-
ies of amphibians began in 1978. Ninety-three species of
amphibians have been studied so far, about 42% of the
220 living amphibian species in China (Table 1).
Changes of chromosome numbers. - Kuramoto (1990)
summarized the chromosome numbers of 983 species of
anurans from 21 families (2n= 14-64). Chromosome
number changes occurred in 12 of 21 families with poly-
ploids in some species. In China, the chromosome num-
bers of 79 species from seven families are 22-64 and
variations of chromosome numbers were found in four
genera, three families (Table 2).
Only two species in the family Discoglossidae have
been studied: Bombina orientals and B. maxima. Tian
and Hu (1985) subdivided the genus Bombina into two
subgenera, Bombina and Glandula. Bombina ( B .) orien-
tals has 2n=28 chromosomes (Zhao, 1986), consistent
with the chromosome number of Discoglossus pictus in
Europe (Morescalchi, 1965; Schmid et al., 1987).
Bombina (G.) maxima has 2n=24 chromosomes (Jiang
et al., 1984), as reported by Okumoto (1974) and
Schmid et al. (1987).
The geography of the Hengduan Mountain Ranges
greatly influence the evolution of pelobatid frogs, pro-
viding refugia for some species as well as discontinuous
population distributions that promote allopatric specia-
tion (Yang et al., 1983; Hu et al., 1985). The pelobatids
distributed in the Hengduan Mountain region have dis-
tinct morphological differences adaptive to the unusual
geographic conditions. These species belong to two sub-
families, Megophryinae (Br achy tar sophrys and
Atympanophrys ) and Oreolalaxinae ( Scutiger ,
Vibrissaphora, Leptobrachium, and Oreolalax).
Available karyotypical information showed that species
studied have 2n=26 chromosomes, but karyotypical dif-
ferentiations are prominent in the family. The subgenus
Vibrissaphora is the most specialized, all five species
have 2n=26, consisting of six pairs of large chromo-
somes and seven pairs of small ones, NF=52 and one
stable secondary constriction is located in 6q (in the
NoRs region; Zhao et al., 1983). The karyotypes of three
species in genus Scutiger are similar to those of sub-
genus Vibrissaphora , except the secondary constriction
located in 2P not in 6q. Polymorphic chromosome num-
ber occured in Oreolalax. Two of the three specimens of
O. schmidti are 2n=28 and one is 2n=26 (Zheng andWu,
1989). A similar phenomenon was found in O. liang-
beiensis and C-banding showed that the extra pair of
small chromosomes is C-band negative and not B chro-
mosome (Li et al., 1990). Polymorphic chromosome
numbers were also found in three genera of
Megophryinae. Wu (1987) observed one male triploid in
Atympanophrys shapingensis. Tan et al. (1987) reported
the karyotypes of Brachytar sophrys carinensis. Among
12 individuals examined, seven males and one female
have 2n=26, three males have 2n=27, and the remaining
male has 2n=28. The extra chromosomes are metacen-
tric and between No. 10 and No. 11 in size. In addition,
there are four pairs of small chromosomes which are
telocentric in the2n=26 karyotype and two pairs of small
telocentric chromosomes were observed in M. omei-
montis (Wu, 1987; Zheng and Wu, 1989).
The karotypes of pelobatids reported by foreign
authors are 2n=26, NF=52 with no polymorphic chro-
mosome numbers found, except Leptolalax pelody-
toides with 2n=24 (Morescalchi, 1973; Morescalchi et
al. 1977; Schmid, 1980, 1987). It is interesting that a
special karyotype was observed in Rana phrynoides dis-
tributed in Hengduan Mountains. In this species, 2n=64
consisting of all telocentric chromosomes. Only one
homologous pair of NORs being found in interstitial
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 299
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Table 1. A list of amphibian species studied karyologically.
segment of No. 20 chromosome, i.e, position of the sole
secondary constriction, and No. 32 being sat-chromo-
somes (Liu and Zan, 1984; Wu and Zhao, 1984). This
karyotype is unique for anurans.
Karyological Studies on wood frogs in China. - In
China, wood frogs include five species ( R . altaica, R.
amurensis, R. japonica, R. chaochiaoensis, and R.
chensinensis', Tian and Jiang, 1986). Rana chensinensis
had been called R. temproaria chensinensis (Pope and
Boring, 1940; Liu and Hu, 1961). Wu (1981) reported
the karyotype of R. chensinensis from Beijing, which
has 2n=24 chromosomes, including six pairs of large
chromosomes (relative length>7%) and six pairs of
small ones (relative length<6%), while R. temporaria in
Europe has 2n=26 (Guillemin, 1967), including five
pairs of large chromosomes and eight pairs of small
ones. Consequently, he suggested that R. chensinensis
should be a good species, not a subspecies of R. tempo-
raria. Wei et al. (1990) compared the C-bands and
NORs between R. chensinensis from type locality and R.
temporaria in Europe. As a result, in the former species,
centric C-bands located in Nos. 9 and 10 chromosomes
and telocentric C-bands in the terminations of a few
chromosomes, 28 interstitial C-bands, one pair of stan-
dard NORs in llq, and small additional NORs are
found. However, in the latter species, both centric and
telocentric C-bands are located in all chromosomes and
only three interstitial C-bands and 1 pair of NORs in lOq
were developed (Schmid, 1978). Evidently, this compar-
ison supports Wu’s suggestion.
Jiang et al. (1984), Luo and Li (1985) and Ma
(1987) indicated that R. chensinensis from different
localities have the same 2n=24 pattern, but the numbers
of subtelocentric chromosomes and the positions of sec-
ondaiy constrictionas are locality specific by comparing
the karyotypes of R. chensinensis from Beijing,
Qingdao, Lanzhou, Harbin, Hongyuan and Yanbei.
Consequently, it was suggested that R. chensinensis
might contain different subspecies .
The five species of wood frogs have 2n=24 or
2n=26 chromosomes and may be divided into two
groups: R. japonica , R. chaochiaoensis and R. amuren-
sis belong to 2n=26 group and R. chensinensis and R.
altaica to 2n=24 group. The karyotypic differences
between two groups are listed in Table 3.
Rana japonica from Hiroshima, Japan has 2n=26
chromosomes, Nos. 8 and 9 are subtelocentric and the
secondary constriction is located in 9q; R. amurensis
coreana from Korea has 2n=26, Nos. 10 and 13 subte-
locentric and secondary constriction in 9q; while R.
chensinensis from Hokkaido, Japan has 2n=24, No.l 1 is
subtelocentric and the secondary constriction in lOq
(Nishioka, et al., 1987). Matsui (1991) described R.
chensinensis from Hokkaido as a new species, R. pirica,
based on morphometric and electrophoretic studies.
The No. 6 chromosome of the species having 2n=24
is nearly the same in relative length as the sum of chro-
mosomes No. 11 and No. 12 or No. 13 of the species with
26 chromosomes, For instance, the average relative
length of No. 6 chromosomes of R. chensinensis and R.
altaica is 8.19, while the average relative lengths of
Nos. 11, 12 and 13 chromosomes of the other three
species are 4.52,4.31 and 3.82 respectively. In addition,
it is clear from Table 3 that there are more subtelocen-
tric chromosomes and secondary constrictions in the
species having 26 chromosomes than those in the
species having 24 chromosomes, and they are con-
cerned with small chromosomes. Accordingly, it is
speculated that all wood frog species would have a com-
mon ancestor, from which the species having 26 chro-
mosomes were derived and the species having 24 chro-
mosomes evolved via fusion of two pairs of small chro-
mosomes of the former. Then, the species possessing
2004
Vo). 10, p. 300
Table 2. A summary of chromosome numbers of 79 anuran species.
* = Polymorphic chromosome number occurs in some species.
different subtelocentric chromosomes and secondary
constriction positions were developed into two groups
through inversions and translocations. The high resolu-
tion R-bands of R. japonica were prepared and analyzed
(Heng, 1984), providing a practical technique for study-
ing karyotypic evolution of amphibians.
Sex chromosomes and sex-determining mechanisms. -
The first successful demonstration of sex-determining
mechanism was made by making use of reversal and
breeding experiments (Humphrey, 1942, 1945, 1957).
The applications of cytogenetic techniques, such as C-
banding, quinacrine mustard staining, Ag-NORs stain-
ing and in situ hybridization of nucleic acids, have been
helpful to the investigations on sex chromosomes and
sex-determining mechanisms in amphibians. So far,
eleven species with cytologically detected sex chromo-
somes, including XY and ZW systems, even an OW/OO
system of sex determination and multiple sex chromo-
somes in one genome(Schmid et al., 1992) were discov-
ered. Few sex-specific chromosome pairs in heteroga-
metic individuals are heteromorphic and most of them
are homomorphic.
The homomorphic chromosome pair No.4 in Rana
esculenta was identified as sex-specific chromosomes of
XX/XY type by BrdU replication banding technique. All
males have an extremely late-replication band in the
long arm of Y, which is lacking in the X (Schempp and
Schmid, 1981). The homomorphic chromosome pair
No. 10 in Bufo gargarizans was demonstrated to be sex
chromosomes of ZZ/ZW type. The Z chromosomes in
all males replicated synchronously, while Z and W chro-
mosomes of females revealed heteromorphic replication
bands at the late replication stage. There was a replica-
tion band on W chromosome’s long arm and Z chromo-
some lacked the band (Wen et al., 1982;Shang and
Deng, 1982). Similarly, the chromosome No. 6 pair in
Bufo raddei was identified as XX/XY sex chromosomes
(Deng and Shang, 1984) and the No. 9 chromosomes of
Rana nigromaculata as XX/XY sex chromosomes (Wu
and Zhang, 1985). The sex chromosomes of species
mentioned above are homomorphic and could only be
recognized by BrdU replication banding. So they are at
the initial stage of sex chromosome differentiation.
The Y or Z chromosomes of homomorphic sex
chromosomes in some anurans heterochromatinized so
Vol. 10, p. 301
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Table 3. karyotypic comparison between wood frog groups.
highly that they could be recognized by C-banding or
other specific staining of constitutive heterochromatin,
for example, the XX/XY sex chromosomes in genus
Triturus (Schmid, et ah, 1979). Chinese scholars Wu and
Chen (unpublished data) determined the homomorphic
chromosome pair No. 9 as XX/XY sex chromosomes in
Rana margaratae using C-banding and quinacrine mus-
tard staining. There is one interstitial C-band, i.e, the
brightest fluorescense band, on both No. 9 chromosomes
in females. The interstitial C-band is located only in one
No. 9 chromosome, while one telocentric C-band in the
other No. 9 chromosome shows no fluorescense differen-
tiation.
The first-discovered highly heteromorphic ZW type
sex chromosomes occured in Pyxicephalus adspersus
(Schmid, 1980). The W chromosome is much smaller
than Z chromosome and its short arm is completely het-
erochromatic. Wu and Zhao (1984) and Wu et al. (1987)
demonstrated that Amolops mantzorum has well-differ-
entiated XY type sex chromosomes, the Y chromosome
is subtelocentric and mainly composed of euchromatin,
but has strong C-band in the middle of long arm and X
chromosome is metacentric by conventional Giemsa
staining and C-banding methods.
Karyological studied in urodeles. - Only two species
were studied by C-banding and the others by conven-
tional Giemsa staining. The karyotypic comparisons are
listed in Table 4. The family Hynobiidae has a wide geo-
graphical distribution. Twenty-six species in five genera
out of more than 34 species in eight genera have been
studied karyologically. The chromosome number vary
from 40 to 80 . Twelve species in Hynobius and one in
Salamandrella had been studied by C-banding, Ag-
NORs staining, and R-banding. The relationships in the
two genera were discussed by comparing banded kary-
otypes and Southern hybridizations. It is suggested that
the family is the most primitive living caudate
(Morescalchi, 1973; Kohno et al., 1991).The same con-
clusion is derived from morphological comparisons
(Zhao and Hu, 1984).
There are 17 species in seven genera in Hynobiidae
known from China. The family can be divided into two
groups: Hynobius group and Ranodon group. The
Ranodon group evolved by adaptation towards two dif-
ferent life-forms: aquatic and terrestrial. Liua and
Batrachuperus are aquatic and are closely related. Table
4 shows that seven species have high chromosome num-
bers: 2n=62-68. Their karyotypes are bimodal and sym-
metrical, with more microchromosomes (Yang, 1992).
Salamandrella keyserlingii has 2n=62 chromosomes,
the karyotype formula being 4M + 2SM + 10ST + 10T
+ 36 m (Wang et al., 1983) in accordance with that
reported by Morescalchi (1975), Morescalchi et al.
(1979), Grafodatsky et al. (1978), Kuro-o(1986), and
Ikebe et al. (1990). The bivalent number in cells of male
Batrachuperus pinchonii in diakinesis is 3 1 . We expect
the diploid chromosome number to be 2n=62 (Yang and
Zhao, 1984), but this species also has 2n=66 chromo-
somes (Kuro-o et al., unpublished data). There is little
detailed information on the cause of the difference.
The karyotypic differentiation of Hynobiidae is
more complex. First, variations in diploid chromosome
number occurred not only at the intergeneric level, but
also at the intrageneric level. For instance,
Salamandrella has 2n=62, Batrachuperus 2n=62-68,
both Liua and Pachyhynobius 2n=64. Secondly, the
numbers of microchromosomes vary from 36 to 46.
Finally, the morphology of microchromosomes are vari-
able. The numbers of M, SM, and ST are species-specif-
ic. Telocentric macrochromosomes were found in S', key-
serlingii, L. shihi and P. shangchengensis, but not in
Batrachuperus. The L. shihi and P. shangchengensis
studied were from the type localities (Zhao and Hu,
1983; Fei et al., 1983). Both two species have 2n=64
chromosomes, different from the known genera.
However, they are different in morphology of
macrochromosome and microchromosome number
(Table 4) . Therefore, the cytogenetic data provide evi-
dence supporting those genera and species.
There are four species in Batrachuperus.
Batrachuperus karlschmidti and B. yenyuanensis are
only found higher than 3000M in the Hengduan
Mountains, having 2n=68, no telocentric macromo-
somes and 44 and 46 microchromosomes respectively.
Batrachuperus pinchonii and B. tibetanus distributed
higher than 1600M of Hengduan Mountains and adja-
cent areas have 2n=62. Obviously, the karyotypic differ-
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 302
Table 4. Karyological comparisons of urodela in China. M-metacentric macrochromosomes, SM-submetacentric
macrochromosomes; ST-subtelocentric macrochromosomes; T-telocentric macrochromosomes, m-microchromo
somes.
entiations in Batrachuperus are in conformity with the
geographic distribution.
Salamandridae is the advanced family in Caudata
either from the viewpoint of karyotypic information or
from that of morphological characteristics (Morescalchi,
1973, 1975, 1979; Zhao and Hu, 1984; Yang,
1992). There are five genera of Salamandridae found in
China: Tylototriton, Echinotriton, Cynops,
Paramesotriton, and Pachytriton. Of the five genera,
Tylototriton is the most primitive and Pachytriton the
most advanced . The seven species studied in five gen-
era have the same chromosome number, 2n=24, without
microchromosomes. The karyotypes are unimodal and
symmetrical (Table 3). Interspecific differences were
found in Tylototriton. The karyotypic formula of T. kwe-
ichawensis is 16M+6SM+2ST, the same as that of T.
verrucosus. However, Nos. 6, 8 and 11 are submetacen-
tric and no secondary constriction was found in the for-
mer (Yang, 1990), while Nos. 6, 7 and 11 are submeta-
centric and secondary constriction were found at every
chromosomes except No. 12 in the latter (Seto et al.,
1982). Echinotriton andersoni has 2n=24 chromosomes,
14M + 8SM+ 2 ST, one more submetacentric chromo-
some pair than both T. kweichowcensis and T.verrucosus
(Seto et ah, 1982). In addition, the relative length of
chromosome No. 1 is the longest and that of No. 12 the
shortest in E. andersoni among the three species men-
tioned above. The karyotypic formulas of Pachytriton
brevipes and Cynops orientals are nearly identical and
only the differences of C-band patterns are found (Zhu
and Wei, 1981).
The predominant mode of karyotypic evolution in
Caudata is that the unimodal symmetrical karyotypes
with fewer chromosome number are derived from the
bimodal and asymmetrical karyotypes with more chro-
mosome number, via Robertsonian centric fusions and
pericentric inversions (Morescalchi, 1975).
Robertsonian centric fusions, which could occur
between telocentric macrochromosomes, between stable
microchromosomes, and between telocentric
macrochromosomes and stable microchromosomes,
cause reduction of the diploid number and the
microchromosome number and increase of the metacen-
tric chromosomes. Consequently, the karyotypes tend
toward stability. Pericentric inversions do not change the
diploid number, but could increase the number of meta-
centric chromosomes and the stability of karyotypes.
There are some differences in the evolutionary
trends of Hynobiidae and Salamandridae. The karyotyp-
ic evolution in Hynobiidae involves Robertsonian cen-
tric fusion as well as pericentric inversion. However, the
phylogeny of the family could not be established on the
available data. It is obvious that the karyotypes of
Salamandridae are more stable than those of
Hynobiidae. Morescalchi (1975) proposed that all
species studied possess similar karyotypes that differ
very little even at the intergeneric level. The differences
between the karyotypes mainly lie in the absolute size of
chromosomes and quantity of DNA. Accordingly, the
karyotypic diversity among the species has chiefly
resulted fiom pericentric inversions and reciprocal
translocations that result in differences between individ-
ual chromosomes by changing the telocentric chromo-
somes into metacentric ones or changing the metacentric
chromosomes into submetacentric, subtelocentric and
telocentric chromosomes.
Vol. 10, p. 303
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Acknowledgments
I want to express my thanks to three professors: Zhao
Ermi, Chen Wenyuan and Wang Xizhong. Under their
encouragement and guidence this paper was worked
out. Sincere thanks are also extended to professor
Zheng Xuejing, who read and made some corrections
to this paper.
Literature Cited
Deng, C. and K. Shang. 1984. A cytogenetics demon-
stration of XY sex determination in Bufo raddei.
Acta Genetica Sinica. 11:395-399. (In Chinese).
Fei, L. and C. Ye. 1983. A new genus and species of
Flynobiidae from Henan, China. Amphibian
Research 1:1. (In Chinese).
Grafodatsky, A. S., O. V. Grigoriev, and A. A.
Isaenko.1978. Differential staining of chromosomes
in four species of amphibians. Zoological Zhumal
57:1279-1281.
Heng, H.-Q. 1984. Studies on high resolution R-band of
the chromosomes of Rana japonica japonica. Acta
Herpetological Sinica. 3(2):55-59. (In Chinese)
Hu, Q., Y. Jiang, and E. Zhao. 1985. Studies on the influ-
ence of the Hengduan Mountains on the evolution
of the amphibians. Acta Herpetological Sinica
4(3):225-233. (In Chinese).
Ikebe, C., M. Kuro-o, T, Yamamato, and S. Kohno.
1990. Cytogenetic studies of Hynobiidae (Urodela).
XI. Banding karyotype of Salamandrella keyser-
lingii Dybowski and a comparison with those of
Hynobius species. Cytogenetic Cell Genetics
54:169-171.
Jiang, S., C. Shen and Y. Meng. 1984. Preliminary
observations on the karyotype of Bombina orien-
tals. Acta Herpetological Sinica 3(1): 19-23. (In
Chinese)
Kohno, S., M. Kuro-o, and C. Ikebe. 1991. Cytogenetics
and evolution of Hynobiid salamanders. In D. M.
Green and S. K. Session (eds). Amphibian
Cytogenetics and Evolution. Academic Press., San
Diego.
Kuramoto, M. 1990. A list of chromosome numbers of
Anuran amphibians. Bulletin of Fukuka University
of Education 39:83-127.
Kuro-o, M. 1986. Cytogenetic studies of genus
Hynobius by means of DNA repliction pattern (R-
banding). M. Sc. Thesis. Toho University,
Funabashi, Japan.
Li, S., L. Fei and C. Ye. 1990. Studies of karyotype, Ag-
NORs and C-banding on five mountain pelobatoid
toads from China. Acta Zoologica Sinica. 36:315-
323 (In Chinese).
Liu, C. and S. Hu. 1961. Chinese Tailless Amphibians.
Science Press, Beijing, China. 184 pp. (In
Chinese).
Liu, W. and R. Zan. 1984. A special karyotype in the
genus Rana - an investigation of the karyotype, C-
banding and Ag-stained NORs of Rana phry nodes
Boulenger. Acta Genetica Sinica 11:52-60. (In
Chinese).
Luo, X. and J. Li. 1985. Comparative studies on kary-
otypes of Rana temporaria chensinensis from
Harbin, Lanzhou, and Hongyuan. Acta
Herpetological Sinica 4 (1):5-11. (In Chinese).
Ma, T. 1987. The karyotype of Rana chensisnensis
found in Yanbei prefecture, Shan-xi Province. Acta
Herpetological Sinica 6(l):70-73. (In Chinese)
Matsui, M. 1991. Original description of the brown frog
from Hokkaido, Japan (Genus Rand). Japanese
Journal of Herpetology 14:63-78.
Morescalchi, A. 1965. Osservazioni sulla carioilogia di
Bombina. Bolletin Zoology 32:207-218.
Morescalchi, A. 1973. Amphibia, pp. 233-348 In: A.
B. Chiarelli and Capanna (eds). Cytotaxonomy and
Vertebrate Evolution. Academic Press. New York.
Morescalchi, A. 1975. Chromosome evolution in the
caudate Amphibia. Evolutionary Biology 8:339-
387.
Morescalchi, A. E., E. Olmo and V. Stingo. 1977. Trends
of karyological evolution in pelobatid frogs.
Experientia 33:1577-1578.
Morescalchi, A., G. Odierna and E. Olmo. 1979.
Karyology of the primitive salamanders, family
Hynobiidae. Experientia 35:1434-1435.
Nishioka, M., H. Okomoto, H. Ueda and M. Ryuzaki.
Karyotypes of brown frog distributed in Japan,
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 304
Korea, Europe and North America. Hiroshima
University Bulletin 9:165-212.
Okumoto, H. 1974. Chromosomes of amphibians.
Zoological Magazine 76:39.
Takeshi S., Y. Utsunomiya and T. Utsunomiya. 1982.
Karyotypes and banding patterns of Tylototriton
andersoni Boulenger, a newt endemic to the
Ryukyu islands. Japanese Journal of Genetics
57:527-534.
Schempp, W., and M. Schmid. 1981. Chromosome
banding in Amphibia: Replication patterns in anura
and demonstration of XX/XY sex chromosomes in
Rana esculenta. Chromosoma 83:697-710.
Schmid, M., L. Vitelli and R. Batistoni. 1978.
Chromosome banding in Amphibia: Constitutive
heterochromatin and nucleolus organizer regions in
Ranidae, Microhylidae and Rhacophoridae.
Chromosoma. 68:141-148.
Schmid, M. 1980. Chromosome banding in Amphibia:
Highly differentiated ZW/ZZ sex chromosomes and
exceptional genome size in Pyxicephalus adspersus
(Anura, Ranidae). Chromosoma 80:69-96.
Schmid, M., J. Olert, and J. Klett. 1979. Chromosome
banding in Amphibia: Sex chromosome in Triturus.
Chromosoma 71:29-55.
Schmid, M., C. Steinlein, and W. Feichtinger.
1992. Chromosome banding in Amphibia: First
demonstration of multiple sex chromosomes in
amphibians: Elentherodactylus massi (Anura,
Leptodactylidae). Chromosoma 101: 284-292.
Shang, K. and C. Deng. 1983. A cytogenetic demonstra-
tion of ZW sex determination in Bufo bufo gar-
garizans. Acta Genetica Sinica. 10:298-305. (In
Chinese).
Tan, A., X. Zeng, G. Wu and E. Zhao.
1987. Cytotaxonomical studies on Chinese pelo-
batids: Preliminary study on the karyotype of
Brachytarsophrys carinensis and the variation in
their chromosome number. Acta Herpetological
Sinica 6(2): 1-4. (In Chinese).
Tian, W. and Q. Hu. 1985. Taxonomical studies on the
primitive anurans of the Hengduan Mountains, with
descriptions of a new subfamily and subdivision of
Bombina. Acta Herpetologica Sinica 4(3):2 19-224.
(In Chinese).
Tian, W. and Y. Jiang.1986. Identification guide to the
amphibians and reptiles of China. Science Press,
Beijing. 120 pp. (In Chinese).
Wang, X., J. Fang and X. Tang. 1983. Preliminary obser-
vation on karyotype of Salamandrella keyserlingii.
Acta Herpetological Sinica 2(2): 19-22. (In
Chinese).
Wei, G., F. Chen, and N. Xu. 1990. An investigation for
the karyotypic, C- banding and Ag-NORs pattern on
Rana chensinensis from type locality. Hereditas
12:24-26 (In Chinese).
Wen, C, Q. Lu, and W. Xiang. 1983. Studies of chromo-
some banding and sister chromatid exchange in
Bufo bufo gargarizans. Acta Genetica Sinica.
10:291-297. (In Chinese).
Wu, G. 1987. Cytotaxonomical studies on Chinese pelo-
batids: The analysis of the karyotypes of Megophrys
lateralis and Atymponophrys shapingensis . Acta
Herpetological Sinica 6(3):45-48. (In Chinese).
Wu, G. and E. Zhao. 1984. A rare karyotypes of anurans,
the karyotype of Rana phrynoides. Acta
Herpetological Sinica 3(l):29-32. (In Chinese).
Wu, G. and E. Zhao. 1984. Two rare karyotypes of anu-
rans, the karyotypes of Staurois mantzorum and S.
liangshanensis. Acta Herpetological Sinica 3(4):5-
9. (In Chinese).
Wu, H. and R. Zhang. 1985. A study of sex chromosome
in Rana nigromaculata by BrdU-Hoechst 33258-
Giemsa technique. Acta Genetica Sinica 12:462-
469. (In Chinese).
Wu, W. and W. Chen. 1990. The studies on banded chro-
mosomes of Rana margaratae Liu. M. Sc. thesis.
Sichuan University.Chengdu, China. (In Chinese).
Wu, Z. 1981. Karyotype of Rana chensinensis from
Beijing. Acta Genetica Sinica. 8:138-144. (In
Chinese).
Wu, Z., A. Tan and E. Zhao. 1987. Cytogenetic studies
on four species of Amolops in the Hengduan Range.
Acta Genetica Sinica 14:63-68. (In Chinese).
Yang, D., C. Su and S. Li. 1983. A study on amphibians
and reptiles from the Hengduanshan Mountains of
Yunnan. Acta Herpetological Sinica 2(3):37-49. (In
Chinese).
Vol. 10, p. 305
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Yang, Y. 1992. Karyotypic studies on nine Chinese sala-
manders. Asiatic Herpetological Research 4: ISO-
158.
Yang, Y. and E. Zhao. 1984. Meiotic chromosomes and
chromosome set in male Batrachuperus pinchonii
and B. tibetanus. In E. Zhao and Q. Hu (eds).
Studies on Chinese tailed amphibians. Sichuan
Scientific and Technical Publishing House,
Chengdu. (In Chinese).
Zhao, E., G. Wu and W. Yang. 1983. Studies on Genus
Vibrissaphora (Amphibia: Pleobatidae): A compar-
ative study of the karyotypes of the genus
Vibrissaphora. Acta Herpetological Sinica 2( 1 ): 1 5-
20. (In Chinese).
Zhao,Y. 1986. Studies on the karyotype of Bombina
maxima. Acta Herpetological Sinica 5(3):227-228.
(In Chinese).
Zhao, E. and Q. Hu. 1983. Taxonomy and evolution of
Hynobiidae in Western China, with a description of
a new genus. Acta Herpetological Sinica 2(2):29-
35. (In Chinese).
Zhao, E., Q. Hu., Y. Jiang, Y. Yang. 1988. Studies on
Chinese Salamanders. Contribution to Herpetology
4:1-67.
Zheng, X. and G. Wu. 1989. Cytotaxonomocal studies
on Chinese pelobatids: the karyotypes, C-bands and
Ag-NORs of Megophrys omeimontis and Oreolalax
schmidti. Chinese Herpetological Research 2:37-45.
The History of the Journal Asiatic Herpetological Research
Theodore J. Papenfuss
Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, C A 94720, USA
The origins of Asiatic Herpetological Research go back
34 years. Our present editor. Professor Ermi Zhao start-
ed a scientific periodical. Materials for Herpetological
Research, in 1972. Four issues were published, the last
in 1978 (Zhao and Adler, 1993). The text of all articles
was in Chinese only. The four issues were produced by
the Sichuan Biological Research Institute (now the
Chengdu Institute of Biology). Materials was followed
by Acta Herpetologica Sinica, which was also edited by
Zhao. There were two series between 1979 and 1987.
The “old series” consisted of six volumes published
from 1979-1982 and the “new series” from 1982-1987
(Zhao and Adler, 1993). The articles were in Chinese,
but English titles and often, English abstracts were
included.
Volume 1 of a new journal, Chinese Herpetological
Research, also edited by Zhao, was published in
Chongqing for the Chinese Society for the Study of
Amphibians and Reptiles, with Zhao continuing as edi-
tor. In 1988 Zhao visited the Museum of Vertebrate
Zoology, University of California at Berkeley as part of
his collaboration with J. Robert Macey and E The
MVZ’s single Mac Classic computer that could be used
for desktop publishing impressed him. At Zhao’s
request we agreed to transfer printing and distribution
from China to Berkeley. Macey and I also agreed to
serve as Associate Editors and to help assemble an inter-
national editorial board. We changed the name of the
journal to Asiatic Herpetological Research with volume
3 in 1990. With this volume 10, our journal will return
to the Chengdu Institute of Biology for printing and dis-
tribution. The quality of journals published in China is
now of world standard and the Internet, unknown in
1988, allows for easy electronic transfer of manuscripts,
and easy editing
Although our society is not large in membership, it
is very international. We have published articles by
authors from 29 countries. Fourteen new species of
amphibians and reptiles have been described since 1987.
We organized the First Asian Herpetology Meeting, held
in China in 1992, the Second Asian Herpetology
Meeting held in Turkmenistan in 1995, the Third Asian
Herpetology Meeting held in Kazakhstan in 1998, and a
Fourth Asian Herpetology Meeting in 1991 again in
China.
Literature Cited
Zhao, E. and K. Adler. 1993. Herpetology of China.
Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. 522
pp.
* IT 4-
ACTA HEKPETOUX11CA SINICA
- k * a ♦ -r n
Materials of Acta Herpetologica Acta Herpetologica Chinese
Herpetology Sinica "old series" Sinica "new series" Hemetolooical
1972-1978 1979-1982 1982-1987 Research 1987
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 307
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, pp. 308-3 1 2
Guidelines for Manuscript Preparation and Submission
Summary
Manuscripts must:
1) be written in English.
2) be of letter quality (laser printed or typewritten on bond paper).
3) include camera ready figures (if any).
4) include complete and accurate literature citations.
5) include complete and accurate localities with latitude and longitude.
6) include a camera ready map illustrating regions discussed (when applicable).
Tips for electronic submission
• Do not use multiple tabs or spaces to separate columns in tables.
Either use the table feature of your word processor, a spreadsheet program (e.g. Excel), or separate columns with
a single tab.
Table 1 .Example of improper use of rrmltinlejahs to separate columns in a table.
Column 1 Column 2 ^^V^CA^Column 2 Column 2
12.4 <tabxtabxtab> .5<iob><a^o> 9. 1 <tabxfslfe<ctabxtab> 0.01
12.1 <tabxtabxtab> 9 1020.4<tabxtab> 0.6<tabxtabxtabxtab> 0.02
• Do not type authors names in all capitals in literature cited.
• Do not use two spaces following a period, or for any other purpose.
• Do not attempt to recreate the format of the journal in your manuscript.
Please use only simple formatting limited to italics, boldface, and underline.
Manuscripts failing to meet these criteria will be returned without review for correction.
Purpose and Content
Asiatic Herpetological Research publishes articles concerning but not limited to Asian herpetology. The editors
encourage publications from all countries in an attempt to create an open forum for the discussion of Asian her-
petological research.
Articles should be in standard scientific format and style. The following sections should be included:
Title
The title should reflect the general content of the article in as few words as possible. The editors encouraee titles
that summarize the main findings of the article.
Names and Addresses
The names and addresses of all authors must be complete enough to allow postal correspondence. Please include
email and World Wide Web addresses if applicable.
Abstract
The abstract should briefly summarize the nature of the research, its results, and the main conclusions. Abstracts
should be less than 300 words.
© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 309
Key Words
Key words provide an index for the filing of articles. Key words provide the following information (when appli-
cable): 1) Taxonomy (e.g. Reptilia, Squamata, Gekkonidae, Gekko gecko). 2) Geography (e.g. China, Thailand).
3) Subject (e.g. taxonomic validity, ecology, biogeography). The order of taxonomy, geography, and subject
should be observed.
Text
Manuscripts must be in English and spelling must be correct and consistent. Use Webster's New International
Dictionary for reference. For clarity, use active voice whenever possible. For example, the following sentences in
active voice are preferable to those in passive voice.
Active voice: “Fizards were extremely common on the site.” and “I examined three female snakes.”
Passive voice: “Fizards were observed to be extremely common on the site.” and “Three female snakes were
examined.”
Abbreviation
Do not abbreviate unless the full phrase has already appeared. Scientific names may be abbreviated only if they
have appeared fully in the same paragraph. Never begin a sentence with an abbreviation of a scientific name.
Statistics
Statistics must be accompanied by sample sizes, significance levels, and the names of any tests. Investigators
should pay careful attention to independence and applicability of tests, and randomness of samples. One of the
most frequent examples of nonindependence is the use of multiple, paired t-tests instead of analysis of variance
(anova). In general, multiple tests on the same data set are not valid. Descriptive statistics are in many cases more
appropriate than inferential statistics.
Standard Format
Manuscripts following standard format should include introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections.
While other formats are acceptable, the editors encourage the use of standard format. Please do not type in all
capital letters.
Introduction
The introduction typically states the significance of the topic and reviews prior research.
Material and Methods
This section should clearly state where, when, and how research was carried out. Include sample sizes. Protocols
designed by other investigators must be properly cited. Research materials and their manufacturers should be
listed. The reader must be able to replicate the methods of the author(s).
Results
This section states the results and their significance to the investigation. Figures and tables may be used to clarify,
but not to replace, results statements in the text. Statistics should be used when applicable. Large amounts of data
should be avoided, or included as an appendix at the end of the article.
Discussion
The discussion is a synthesis of the introduction and the results. No new information should be discussed unless
it was presented in the results section. New findings should be discussed in relation to prior research. The
author(s) should feel free to present several possible interpretations of the results. The editors particularly
encourage suggestions of future research in Asian herpetology.
Vol. 10, p. 310
2004
Manuscript Preparation
Overview
Please do not attempt to replicate the formatting style of AHR in your manuscript. All formatting except italics
will be removed in the production process. Bold and underlined text should be used only to identify section head-
ing levels (see below). Extraneous formatting is counterproductive and increases the production costs of the jour-
nal. There are a few simple guidelines that authors must follow.
Section Headings
Articles will be published using three section heading styles. All heading levels must be on their own line, and
left justified. For the purposes of manuscript submission, Level 1 heading is bold, and generally reserved for
Introduction, Material and Methods, Results, and Discussion; Level 2 is italic , and Level 3 is underlined.
Figures
Figures must be referenced in order in the text. Each figure illustration (line art or photograph) submitted must
be “camera ready” for publication with no modifications necessary other than reduction. AHR does not publish
“plates”; please refer to these as figures numbered sequentially. Do not write on figure; do not mount more than
one figure to a sheet. AHR cannot be responsible for redrawing, touching up, or otherwise modifying figure illus-
trations for authors. In addition, figure illustrations submitted must:
1) be of publication quality with typeset text.
2) be mounted on a separate 21.5 x 28 cm (8.5 x 1 1 inch) sheet with figure number on back.
3) be on a separate sheet from figure legend.
4) not have poor type or handwriting on the face of the figure.
5) The TIFF file format is preferable for electronic versions of figures, but Photoshop, JPEG, or PICT formats are
acceptable. Resolution of electronic versions of figures must be at least 600 dpi for line art, or 300 dpi for gray-
scale and color images.
6) Figures will be reduced to either 1 column (3.25”) or two columns (6.5”).
Times Roman typeface is preferred. In order to avoid wasted effort, please follow the above instructions care-
fully. Please note: AHR will not alter or lay out figures for publication. Any figure requiring modification will be
returned, and may cause significant delay in publication.
Figure Legends. Figure legends should be typed on a separate sheet. Legends should explain the figure without
reference to the text. A figure and legend should make sense if separated from the rest of the article. For example:
Figure 2. Lateral view of live Psammodynastes pulverulentus holding a prey lizard (Anolis car-
olinensis ). Note buccal tissue surrounding the enlarged anterior maxillary and dentary teeth of
the snake.
Color Figures. AHR may publish color figures at the discretion of the editors. AHR is now published both on
paper and electronically. Printing costs of color figures may be required for the paper version of AHR. Color fig-
ures will be published free of charge in the electronic version. If you submit color figures, please indicate if you
wish them to be considered for publication in color in the paper version. Otherwise, they will be converted to
black and white in the paper version.
Tables
Tables must be referenced in order in the text. Each table should be typewritten, double spaced on a separate
sheet. For electronic submission, prepare tables as columns separated by one tab only. Do not use spaces to sepa-
rate columns. End rows with a single carriage return.
Typeface
Twelve point type is preferred. Supply a detailed list of special characters (greek letters, male or female symbols,
etc.) that are not part of a standard font.
2004
Asiatic Herpetological Research
Vol. 10, p. 311
Literature Cited
Accurate and standard references are a crucial part of any article. This is especially important when dealing with
publications from many different countries. The reader must be able to precisely identify any literature cited.
References in the text must be checked for consistency with references in the literature cited section. All refer-
ences cited in the text must be in the literature cited section. The literature cited section may not contain any ref-
erences not mentioned in the text. Articles containing inaccurate or inconsistent literature citations will be
returned for correction.
References in Text. 1) References to articles by one or two authors must include both surnames in the order they
appear in the original publication. References to articles by more than two authors must include the first author's
surname, followed by “et al.” 2) The year of article follows the authors, separated only by a space. 3) References
with the same author and year are distinguished by the lower case characters “a, b, c, . . .” 4) References cited in
text are listed in alphabetical order by first author.
For example, “My results also incorporate literature records (Marx et al., 1982; Marx and Rabb, 1972;
Mertens, 1930; Pope, 1929; Wall, 1909, 1910a, 1910b, 1910c).”
References in Literature Cited. 1) References must include all authors, in the order that they appear in the orig-
inal publication; “et al.” is never used in a literature cited section. 2) The first author is listed surname first, ini-
tials) last. All other authors are listed initial(s) first, surname last. 3) References with the same author and year
are distinguished by the lower case characters, “a, b, c, . . .” 4) References cited are listed in alphabetical order by
first author. 5) Names of journals are not abbreviated. See below for examples:
Journal article
Dial, B. E. 1987. Energetics and performance during nest emergence and the hatchling frenzy in loggerhead sea
turtles ( Caretta caretta). Herpetologica 43(3):307-315.
Journal article from a journal that uses year instead of volume
Gatten, R. E. Jr. 1974. Effect of nutritional state on the preferred body temperatures of turtles. Copeia
1 974(4):9 1 2-9 17.
Journal article, title translated, article not in English
Ananjeva, N. B. 1986. [On the validity of Megalochilus mystaceus (Pallas, 1776)]. Proceedings of the Zoological
Institute, Leningrad 157:4-13. (In Russian).
Note that for Acta Herpetologica Sinica, the year must precede the volume number. This is to distinguish
between the old and new series, and between 1982-1987, Vols.1-6 (new series) and 1988 with no volume number,
numbers 1 and 2 (new series).
Cai, M., J. Zhang, and D. Lin. 1985. [Preliminary observation on the embryonic development of Hynobius chin-
ensis Guenther]. Acta Herpetologica Sinica 1985, 4(2): 177-180. (In Chinese).
Book
Pratt, A. E. 1892. To the snows of Tibet through China. Longmans, Green, and Co., London. 268 pp.
Article in book
Huey, R. B. 1982. Temperature, physiology, and the ecology of reptiles. Pp. 25-91. In C. Gans and F. H. Pough
(eds.), Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 12, Physiological Ecology. Academic Press, New York.
Government publication
United States Environmental Data Service. 1968. Climatic Atlas of the United States. Environmental Data Ser-
vice, Washington, D. C.
Abstract of oral presentation
Arnold, S. J. 1982. Are scale counts used in snake systematics heritable? SSAR/HL Annual Meeting. Raleigh,
North Carolina. [Abstr].
Vol. 10, p. 312
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004
Thesis or dissertation
Moody, S. 1980. Phylogenetic and historical biogeographical relationships of the genera in the Agamidae (Rep-
tilia: Lacertilia). Ph.D. Thesis. University of Michigan. 373 pp.
Anonymous, undated
Anonymous. Undated. Turpan brochure. Promotion Department of the National Tourism Administration of the
People's Republic of China, China Travel and Tourism Press, Turpan, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region,
China.
Copyright
Asiatic Herpetological Research reserves the copyrights to all material published therein, except that excluded
by permission of the editors. Any material under a prior copyright submitted to Asiatic Herpetological Research
must be accompanied by the written consent of the copyright holder.
Submission of Manuscripts
Authors should submit letter quality, double spaced, single-sided manuscripts both in English and in the original
language on 21.5 x 28 cm (8.5 x 11 inch) white bond paper. If possible, include a computer diskette containing
the manuscript. Macintosh diskettes, Zip disks, or 3.5” magneto-optical (MO), containing Adobe FrameMaker,
Word Perfect, Microsoft Word, Claris Works, Macwrite, Write Now, or text files, or 3.5" MS/PC DOS diskettes,
Zip disks, or 3.5” MO with Adobe FrameMaker, Word Perfect, Microsoft Word, RTF, or ASCII files are prefera-
ble. Please indicate author, computer, file format, and file name in writing on the disk. The TIFF file format is
preferable for electronic versions of figures, but Photoshop, JPEG, or PICT formats are acceptable. Resolution of
electronic versions of figures must be at least 600 dpi for line art, or 300 dpi for grayscale and color images. Fig-
ures will be reduced to either 1 column (3.25”) or two columns (6.5”).
Manuscripts will be reviewed. The editors will attempt to choose reviewers whose research knowledge most
closely matches the content of the manuscript.
Asiatic Herpetological Research requests $25 US per printed page from authors with funds available. Please
indicate if funds are available.
Send manuscripts by postal mail to Editors, Asiatic Herpetological Research, Museum of Vertebrate Zoology,
3101 Valley Life Sciences Building, University of California, Berkeley CA 94720-3160 USA.
Send manuscripts by Internet email to asiaherp@berkeley.edu as a MIME attachment with binhex or
uuencode encoding. If you use email to submit, an editor will acknowledge receipt of your manuscript. Please
note that it is possible for your email message to disappear on the Internet without being delivered. If your mes-
sage is returned, or not acknowledged, you may want to try again or to send your manuscript by postal mail.
Kuinulta§, Y., S. H. Durma§, Y., Kaska, M. Oz, and M. R. Turn;. A Morphological and Taxonomic Study
on Lacerta parva Boulenger, 1887 (Sauria: Lacertidae) from West Taurus, Turkey 202-207
Macey, J. R. and N. B. Ananjeva. Genetic Variation Among Agamid Lizards of the Trapelus agilis
Complex in the Caspian-Aral Basin 208-214
Ugurta§, i. H., H. S. Yildirimhan, and M. Kalkan. The Feeding Biology of Ran a macrocnemis
Boulenger, 1885 (Anura: Ranidae), Collected in ULUDAg, Bursa, Turkey 215-216
Sevin^, M., \. H. Ugurta§, and H. S. Yildirimhan. Morphological Observations on the Erythrocyte
and Erythrocyte Size of Some Gecko Species, Turkey 217-223
Sharif i, M. and S. Assadian. Distribution and Conservation Status of Neurergus microspilotus
(Caudata: Salamandridae) in Western Iran 224-229
Tosunoglu, M., D. Ayaz, C. V. Tok, and B. Dulger. An Investigation on the Blood Cells of the
Leopard Gecko, Eublepharis angr.4mainyu (Reptilia: Sauria: Eublepharidae) 230-234
Ahsan, M. F. and S. Parvin. A Record of Boiga ochracea walli (Stoliczka, 1870) from Bangladesh 235
Ahsan, M. F. and M. A. Saeed. Some Aspects of Breeding Biology of the Bengal Lizard ( Varan us
BENGALENSIS) IN BANGLADESH 236-240
Das, I. ANew Locality for the Rare Bornean Skink, Lamprolepis vyneri (Shelford, 1905)
(Sauria: Scincidae) 241-244
Das, I. and S. K. Chanda. Leptobrachium smithi Matsui, Nabitabhata, and Panha, 1999 (Anura:
Megophryidae), and Addition to the Fauna of Myanmar (Burma) 245-246
Grismer, J. L., L. L. Grismer, I. Das, N. S. Yaakob, L. B. Liat, T. M. Leong, T. M. Youmans, and H. Kaiser.
Species Diversity and Checklist of the Herpetofauna of Pulau Tioman, Peninsular Malaysia,
With a Preliminary Overview of Habitat Utilization 247-279
Guo, P. and E. Zhao. Pareas stanleyi - A Record New to Sichuan, China and a Key to the
Chinese Species 280-281
Litvinchuk, S. N., L. J. Borkin, and J. M. Rosanov. Intraspecific and Interspecific Genome Size Variation
In Hynobiid Salamanders of Russia and Kazakhstan: Determination by Flow Cytometry 282-294
Schaedla, W. H. Anomalous (?) Nocturnal Feeding by the Agamid Lizard Calotes emma in
Northeastern Thailand 295-297
Yang, Y. Karyological Studies on Amphibians in China 298-305
Papenfuss, T. J. The History of the Journal Asiatic Herpetological Research 306-307
Editors. Guidelines for Manuscript Preparation and Submission 308-312
Asiatic Herpetological Research is created using QuarkXPress 6.0. Adobe Illustrator 10. Adobe Acrobat 6. and Adobe Photoshop
6 on both Macintosh OS 10 and Microsoft Windows XP operating system platforms. Body text is in Times New Roman and the
Headings in Arial. Using digital technology, we consumed less than 400 sheets of paper in the prepress production of this issue.
ISSN 1051-3825
Diaz, R. E., M. T. Leong, L. L. Grismer, and N. S. Yaakob. A New Species of Dibamus
(Squamata: Dibamidae) from West Malaysia
Grismer, L. L., j. L. Grismer, and T. M. Youmans. A New Species of Leptolalax (Anura: Megophryidae)
FROM PlILAU TlOMAN, WEST MALAYSIA I I
Leong, T. M. and L. L. Grismer. A New Species of Kukri Snake, Oligodon (Colubridae), from Pulau
Tioman, West Malaysia 12-16
Stuart, B. L. and H. Heatwole. A New Philautus (Amphibia: Rhacophoridae) from Northern Laos 17-21
Diesmos, A. C., G. V. A. Gee, M. L. Diesmos, R. M. Brown, P. J. Widmann, and J. C. Dimalibot.
Rediscovery of the Philippine Forest Turtle, Heosemys leytensis (Chelonia; Bataguridae), from
Palawan Island, Philippines 22-27
Feldman, C. R. and J. F. Parham. Molecular Systematics of Old World Stripe-Necked Turtles
(Testudines: Mauremys ) 28-37
Hutchison, J. H„ P. A. Holroyd, and R. L. Ciochon. A Preliminary Report on Southeast Asia’s Oldest
Cenozoic Turtle Fauna from the Late Middle Eocene Pondaung Formation, Myanmar 38-52
Joyce, W. G. and C. J. Bell. A Review of the Comparative Morphology of Extant Testudinoid Turtles
(Reptilies: Testudines) 53-109
Le, Minh, T. Hoang, and D. Le. Trade Data and Some Comments On the Distribution of Mauremys
ANNAMENS1S (SlEBENROCK, 1 903) 110-113
Perala, J. and R. Bour. Neotype of Testudo terrestris ForsskAl, 1775 (Testudines, Testudinidae) 114-119
Schilde, M., D. Barth, and U. Fritz. An Ocadia sinensis x Cyclemys shanensis hybrid (Testudines:
Geomydidae) 120-125
Shi, H., Z. Fan, F. Yin, and Z. Yuan. New Data on the Trade and Captive Breeding of Turtles in
Guangxi Province, South China 126-128
Stuart, B. L. and S. G. Platt. Recent Records of Turtles and Tortoises from Laos, Cambodia, and
Vietnam 129-150
Auffenberg, K., K. L. Krysko, and W. Auffenberg. Studies on Pakistan Lizards: Cyrtopodion stoliczkai
(Steindachner, 1867) (Gekkonidae: Gekkoninae) 151-160
Diilger, B., j. H. Ugurta§, and M. Sevin^ Antimicrobial Activity in the Skin Secretion of Bufo viridis
(Laurenti, 1768) 161-163
Du§en, S., M. Oz, and M. R. Tunq:. Analysis of the Stomach Contents of the Lycian Salamander
Mertensiella luschani (Steindachner, 1891) (Urodela: Salamandridae), Collected from Southwest
Turkey 164-167
Ebrahimi, M., H. G. Kami, and M. Stock. First Description of Egg Sacs and Early Larval Development
in Hynobiid Salamanders (Urodela, Hynobiidae, Batrachuperus ) from North-Eastern Iran 168-175
Jarrar, B. M„ and N. T. Taib. Histochemical Characterization of the Lingual Salivary Glands of the
House Gecko, Ptyodactylus hasselqu/stii ( Squamata: Gekkonidae) 176-181
Kami, H. G. The Biology of the Persian Mountain Salamander, Batrachuperus persicus (Amphibia,
Caudata Hynobiidae) in Golestan Province, Iran 182-190
Khan, M. S. Annotated Checklist of Amphibians and Reptiles of Pakistan 191-201
(Continued on inside back cover)
Herpetological
Research
Volume 11 • 2008
Chengdu Institute of Biology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
Asiatic Herpetological Research Society at the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology,
University of California
MCZ ERNST MAYR LIBRARY
3 2044 118 665 082