published by
THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF QUEENSLAN
Volume 30, Part 3, 30 September 2003
Price: $6.00 per part
ISSN 1320 6133
THE AUSTRALIAN ENTOMOLOGIST
The Australian Entomologist is a non-profit journal published in four parts annually
by the Entomological Society of Queensland and is devoted to entomology of the
Australian Region, including New Zealand, Papua New Guinea and islands of the
south-western Pacific. Articles are accepted from amateur and professional
entomologists. The journal is produced independently and subscription to the journal
is not included with membership of the Society.
The Publications Committee
Editor: Dr D.L. Hancock
Assistant Editors: Dr CJ. Burwell
Queensland Museum
University of Queensland
Dr G.B. Monteith
Queensland Museum
Business Manager Mr L. Popple
University of Queensland
Subscriptions
Subscription are payable in advance to the Business Manager, The Australian
Entomologist, P.O. Box 537, Indooroopilly, Qld, Australia, 4068.
For individuals: A$25.00 per annum in Australia.
A$30.00 per annum in Asia-Pacific Region.
A$35.00 per annum elsewhere.
For institutions: A$30.00 per annum in Australia.
A$40.00 per annum in Asia-Pacific Region.
A$40.00 per annum elsewhere.
Cheques in currency other than Australian dollars should include an extra A$7.00.
ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF QUEENSLAND
Membership is open to anyone interested in Entomology. Meetings are normally held
in the Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Queensland on the
second Monday of March-June and August-December each year. Meetings are
announced in the Society’s News Bulletin which also contains reports of meetings,
entomological notes, notices of other Society events and information on Members’
activities.
Enquiries relating to the Society should be directed to the Honorary Secretary,
Entomological Society of Queensland, C/- Department of Zoology and Entomology,
University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, 4072.
Sustaining Associates
Centre for Identification and Diagnotics, The University of Queensland; Pest
Management Research, Department of Natural Resources; Tropical Fruit Fly
Research Group, Griffith University.
Cover: Minute wasps of the eulophid genus Astichus are mostly parasites of the
larvae of ciid beetles living within the fruiting bodies of bracket fungi. This
undescribed species is about 2mm in length and occurs in the rainforests of eastern
Australia from southern New South Wales north to the Wet Tropics of Queensland.
Illustration by Geoff Thompson.
Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3): 93-106 93
NEW SPECIES AND RECORDS OF TRYPETINAE (DIPTERA:
TEPHRITIDAE) FROM AUSTRALIA AND THE SOUTH PACIFIC
D.L. HANCOCK! and R.A.I. DREW?
'PO Box 2464, Cairns, Qld 4870
?Australian School of Environmental Studies, Griffith University, Nathan, Qld 4111
Abstract
Calosphenisca ndomae sp. n. and Euphranta lemniscoides sp. n. are described from Solomon
Islands. Euphranta ochrosiae sp. n. is described from Papua New Guinea. Aciuropsis pusio
Hardy and Euphranta lemniscata Enderlein are newly recorded from Australia and New
Caledonia respectively. Host plant and/or distribution records are noted for a further 23 species,
including several new records for Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands and Vanuatu.
Introduction
Australian and Pacific Island fruit flies belonging to the subfamily Trypetinae
have been studied intermittently in recent years, following revisions published
for Australia (Permkam and Hancock 1995) and the Indonesia, Papua New
Guinea and Solomon Islands region (Hardy 1983, 1986, 1987). In an earlier
review (Hancock and Drew 1994), we concentrated on islands of the south-
central Pacific. The present study reports on new and interesting records from
Australia and the southwestern Pacific, including the descriptions of three
new species from Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands.
The following abbreviations for specimen depositories have been used: AQIS
— Australian Quarantine & Inspection Service, Mareeba and Broome; QDPI —
Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane; QMB — Queensland
Museum, Brisbane; UQIC — University of Queensland Insect Collection,
Brisbane. Tribal classification follows Korneyev (1999).
Systematics
Tribe ADRAMINI
Adrama selecta Walker
Material examined. PAPUA NEW GUINEA: 1 9, Morobe Province, 10 km W of Lae,
nr Markam River, banana plantation, 10-16.vii.1999, Yeates et al., malaise, lowland
rainforest (QMB); 1 9, Milne Bay Province, Dabora Village, 1.iii.2000, bred from
Gnetum gnemon, S 875; 4 99, Madang Province, Ohu, 14.xii.2000, bred from
Barringtonia calyptocalyx, M 632 (all QDPI).
Comments. Some of the above specimens were bred from the fruit of
Barringtonia calyptocalyx (Lecythidaceae) and there is a single record from
Gnetum gnemon (Gnetaceae). For other host plants see Hancock et al. (2000).
Coelotrypes flavinus (Hering)
Material examined. PAPUA NEW GUINEA: 1 9, Western Highlands Province, Kuk,
13.viii.1982, J.W. Ismay, swept sweet potato; 7 OO", 3 99, Eastern Highlands
Province, Aiyura Research Station, staff residential area, 23.11.1999, 23.iii.1999,
29.ix.1999, 10.xi.1999 & 19.iv.2001, Leon Saleu, ex cue lure and methyl eugenol
traps P419 (all QDPI).
94 Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3)
Comments. Species in genus Coelotrypes Bezzi breed in the flower buds of
Ipomoea spp. (Convolvulaceae) and sweet potato is a likely host.
Euphranta leichhardtiae Permkam & Hancock
Material examined. AUSTRALIA: 1 9, SE Queensland, nr Fresh Water Lake,
Cooloola, 3-13.iii.1970, E.C. Dahms, rainforest, at light (QMB).
Comments. The above is an additional locality for this little-known eastern
Australian species. It has been bred from the fruit of Rauwenhoffia
leichhardtii (Annonaceae) (Permkam and Hancock 1995).
Euphranta lemniscata Enderlein
Material examined. NEW CALEDONIA: 1 o, 21°07’S, 164°57’E, 30 m, Tiea
Reserve, 4-5.xi.2001, G. Monteith, at UV light (QMB).
Comments. This widespread species is newly recorded from New Caledonia.
Euphranta lemniscoides sp. n.
(Figs 1-2)
Types. Holotype 07, SOLOMON ISLANDS: W Guadalcanal, Tangarare, 21.x.1997, F.
Tsatsia, hand collected on cut end Vitex sp. (in QMB, Reg. No. T 99079). Paratypes:
3 OG, Central Guadalcanal, Mt Austen, 20.x.1995, R.G. Hollingsworth et al., SI
1346 (QDPI).
Description. Male (Fig. 1). Length of body 8.5 mm; of wing 7.8 mm. Head
fulvous, slightly higher than long. Antennae yellow; arista plumose. Face
concave, with a greyish sheen but no dark markings. Frons pubescent, with 3
pairs of frontal and 1 pair of orbital setae, the upper frontals aligned with
orbitals; on 1 specimen a weaker fourth pair of frontal setae present on line of
orbitals, the third pair of frontals shifted anteriorly; ocellar setae weak or
vestigial.
Thorax largely black except pleura partly to extensively red-brown and with
yellow-white markings as follows: postpronotal lobes; lateral postsutural
vittae from suture to enclose intra-alar setae; a large prescutellar elliptical
spot narrowing anteriorly to a point towards suture; a broad band on upper
half of anepisternum, connected by a narrow extension with postpronotal
lobe; katatergite. Notoplera fulvous to red-brown, connected to postpronotal
lobes by a lateral band yellow dorsally and brown ventrally. Scutellum
yellow; subscutellum and mediotergite black. With a full complement of
thoracic setae except presuturals; dorsocentrals placed midway between
supra-alars and prescutellar acrostichals; 2 anepisternals; 4 scutellars. One
specimen has 2 pairs of postpronotal setae and 3 anepisternal setae, the upper
pair close together. Haltere yellow. Legs fulvous except fore and mid tibiae
red-brown and hind tibiae tending black; middle tibia with an apical black
spine; fore femur slightly swollen and with a row of 4-6 ventral black setae.
Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3)
Figs 1-2. Euphranta lemniscoides sp. n. (1) male; (2) male genitalia.
95
96 Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3)
Wing hyaline with a transverse fulvous subbasal band across base of cell c to
base of cell bcu, a dark blackish-brown transverse band from below middle of
cell c to apex of cell bcu, connected to pterostigma by yellow base of cell r,
and a large blackish-brown apical area from pterostigma to hind margin of
wing, leaving apex hyaline (including apices of cells r»;3 and mj), a hyaline
indentation posteriorly in cell m and a hyaline V-shaped band from costa to
upper part of cell dm between the R-M and DM-Cu crossveins; blackish-
brown band in hyaline V reaches vein R4,s. Pterostigma blackish-brown
except narrowly yellow basally. Veins R; and R4:5 setose; R-M crossvein near
middle of cell dm, below apex of pterostigma; cell bcu apically acute.
Abdomen elongate; black except tergite I+II with a quadrate or hourglass-
shaped medial marking and terga III and IV each with a posterior triangular to
quadrate marking, narrowest anteriorly; these markings fulvous with a greyish
sheen. Tergite V elongate, about as long as terga III and IV combined; posterior
margin of tergite V varies from yellow to black. Male genitalia (Fig. 2) with
proctiger and surstyli very elongate.
Female. Unknown.
Host plant. The Mt Austen paratypes were bred from a vine tentatively
identified as Merremia peltata (Convolvulaceae).
Distribution. Known only from Guadalcanal, Solomon Islands.
Comments. E. lemniscoides is very similar to E. lemniscata in wing pattern
but the markings are darker and the apical hyaline area is larger in the former.
In E. lemniscoides the thorax and abdomen are mostly black (generally
fulvous to red-brown in E. lemniscata) and the proctiger and surstyli are
much longer (c.f. E. lemniscata in Permkam and Hancock 1995). Both
species appear to breed in the fruit of Convolvulaceae.
Euphranta marginata Hardy
Material examined. PAPUA NEW GUINEA: 46 CO, 50 99, Madang Province,
Baitabag, 24.v.2000, 4, 11 & 25.x.2000, 15.xi.2000, 30.v.2001, 6, 13, 20 &
27.vi.2001, 4 & 25.vii.2001, 11 & 22.viii.2001, bred from Neuburgia corynocarpa; |
9, same data except 25.vii.2001, ex Ochrosia coccinea, M 1769; 8 OG, 8 99, Madang
Province, Ohu, 4.x.2000, 8.ii.2001 & 21.vi.2001, bred from Neuburgia corynocarpa
(all QDPI).
Comments. Most of the above specimens were bred from the fruit of
Neuburgia corynocarpa (Loganiaceae); the single record from Ochrosia
coccinea (Apocynaceae) is an error. E. marginata was known previously only
from the holotype female from Morobe Province (Hardy 1983).
Euphranta marina Permkam & Hancock
Material examined. PAPUA NEW GUINEA: 1 9, Western Province, Mabaduan
[coast N of Saibai I.], 4.iii.1993, R. Stephens, collected on board boat (QDPI).
Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3) 97
Comments. This coastal Australian species is newly recorded from Papua
New Guinea. It breeds in the mangrove Avicennia marina (Verbenaceae).
Euphranta numeralis Permkam & Hancock
Material examined. AUSTRALIA: 1 OC, SE Queensland, 27%26'S, 152°50’E,
Enoggera Creek at Scrub Rd, Brisbane Forest Park, 7-9.i.1993, R. van Klinken,
rainforest, bred Maclura cochinensis [sic] fruit (UQIC).
Comments. This species was known previously only from the holotype male
from New South Wales (Permkam and Hancock 1995). The above specimen
was bred from fruit of Maclura cochinchinensis (Moraceae).
Euphranta ochrosiae sp. n.
(Figs 3-6)
Types. Holotype QC, PAPUA NEW GUINEA: Madang Province, Baitabag,
1.viii.2001, bred from Ochrosia coccinea, M 1826 (in QMB, Reg. No. T 99080).
Paratypes: 2 OG, 4 99, same data as holotype; 52 070", 43 99, same data except
2.viii.2000, M 176b; 28.11.2001, M 950; 28.iii.2001, M 1106; 25.iv.2001, M 1238; 2
& 9.v.2001, M 1265 & 1291; 3, 20 & 27.vi.2001, M 1507, 1540 & 1591; 4, 11, 19,
25 & 29.vii.2001, M 1623, 1677, 1718, 1728, 1769 & 1777; 1, 8, 15, 22 &
29.viii.2001, M 1809, 1826, 1864, 1884, 1918, 1958, 1980, 1993 & 2021; 31.x.2001,
M 2540 & 2549; 3 OG, 3 99, same data except 5.ix.2001, bred from Myristica sp., M
2035 (4 in QMB, Reg. Nos T 99081-99084; others in QDPI).
Description. Male (Fig. 3). Length of body 6.8 mm; of wing 6.0 mm. Head
fulvous, slightly higher than long. Antennae yellow with third segment
fuscous; arista plumose. Face concave, with a greyish sheen but no dark
markings. Frons fulvous laterally, red-brown medially, with a black central
marking across apical half; pale pubescent; with 2 pairs of frontal and 1 pair
of orbital setae, the frontal setae widely separated with the upper pair just
before the orbitals; ocellar setae absent. Occiput largely black behind eyes.
Thorax mostly black, with greyish tomentosity on anepisternum, along suture
and as a broad medial band on scutum, widest posteriorly; dorsal half of
postpronotal lobe and notopleural callus dark fulvous; ventral half of
postpronotal lobe brown; a broad, yellow prescutellar marking, bordered by
dorsocentral setae. Scutellum yellow with a broad black basal band;
subscutellum and mediotergite black. With a full complement of thoracic
setae except presuturals and prescutellar acrostichals; dorsocentrals placed
midway between supra-alars and scutellum; 2 anepisternals; 4 scutellars.
Haltere pale yellowish-white. Legs with fore femur fulvous with a medial
brown band, mid and hind femora and all tibiae blackish-brown and tarsi dark
fulvous; middle tibia with an apical black spine.
Wing hyaline with a dark blackish-brown transverse band from pterostigma to
basal half of cell dm, bordered distally by R-M crossvein, and a large
blackish-brown apical area enclosing DM-Cu crossvein and curving inwards
posteriorly, leaving apex hyaline (including apices of cells r»;3 and mj), the
98 Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3)
two dark areas separated by a hyaline band from cell r; at apex of pterostigma
to wing margin; cell m with a weak hyaline indentation posteriorly; cell cu,
entirely hyaline. Pterostigma blackish-brown. Vein R; setose; vein R4+5 with a
few setae near base; R-M crossvein placed before middle of cell dm, below
subapical part of pterostigma; cell beu apically acute.
Abdomen elongate; black except terga IHI and III with a quadrate red-brown
medial area, overlaid with greyish tomentosity. Tergite V a little longer than
tergite IV. Male genitalia (Fig. 4) with proctiger and surstyli elongate.
Female. As for male except terga IV-VI laterally fulvous; tergite VI as long as
tergite V; oviscape black, as long as terga IV-VI combined; aculeus (Fig. 5)
short, with distinct subapical teeth and apical serrations; three spermathecae
(Fig. 6) with smooth, oval heads and constricted necks. On the head the
frontal setae vary in position from widely separated with the upper pair just
before the orbital setae to close together and situated anteriorly.
Host plant. Almost all of the type series were bred from the fruit of Ochrosia
coccinea (Apocynaceae); the record from Myristica sp. (Myristicaceae)
appears to be a host misidentification.
Distribution. Known only from Madang Province, Papua New Guinea.
Comments. E. ochrosiae is similar to E. vitabilis Hardy but in E. ochrosiae
the apical hyaline wing spot is larger, the dark transverse band from the
pterostigma is broader (enclosing entire base of cell r»,3) and bordered distally
by the R-M crossvein (not broadly enclosing it). In addition, the basal margin of
the apical brown area is irregularly curved (almost sinuous) in E. ochrosiae
and evenly curved in E. vitabilis.
Euphranta ochrosiae belongs to a small group of Apocynaceae-feeding
species that includes E. cerberae Hancock & Drew from southern Thailand,
E. scutellata Malloch from Solomon Islands and presumably E. vitabilis (host
unknown) from the Bismarck Archipelago (and possibly mainland New
Guinea — see Hardy 1983).
Euphranta perkinsi Hardy
Material examined. PAPUA NEW GUINEA: 4 00’, 3 99, Central Province, Laloki
Agric. Res. Stn, 7.i.1993, D. Tenakanai, reared from Faradaya splendida, F. Muell.,
L 184; 11 OG, 11 99, Madang Province, Ohu, 28.vi.2000 & 19.x.2000, bred from
Morinda bracteata, M 130a & M 446; 1 0, Madang Province, Baitabag, 22. viii.2001,
bred from Ochrosia coccinea, M 1980 [? label error] (all QDPD.
Comments. Most of the above specimens were bred from the fruit of Morinda
bracteata (Rubiaceae). Records from Faradaya splendida (Verbenaceae) and
Ochrosia coccinea (Apocynaceae) appear to be errors; these hosts are used
by other species of Euphranta Loew. The Baitabag specimen may be a
mislabelled specimen from the Ohu series. Host sample M 446 (M. bracteata)
produced 67 flies.
Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3) 99
Figs 3-6. Euphranta ochrosiae sp. n. (3) male; (4) male genitalia; (5) female aculeus;
(6) spermathecae.
100 Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3)
Euphranta perkinsi was described from West Papua, Indonesia (Hardy 1983)
and recorded from Papua New Guinea by Permkam and Hancock (1995).
Euphranta quatei Hardy
Material examined. PAPUA NEW GUINEA: I 0”, 2 99, Madang Province, Ohu,
24.v.2001 & 4.vii.2001, bred from Gmelina moluccana, M 1372 & M 1653; 2 OG,
Madang Province, Baitabag, 16.v.2001, bred from Chionanthus sessiflorum, M 1323
(all QDPI).
Comments. Known previously only from the holotype male from West Papua,
Indonesia (Hardy 1983), this species is newly recorded from Papua New
Guinea. Its host plant appears to be Gmelina moluccana (Verbenaceae), the
two samples yielding eight (M 1372) and six (M 1653) flies respectively. The
record from Chionanthus sessiflorum (Oleaceae) requires confirmation.
Euphranta scutellata Malloch
Material examined. SOLOMON ISLANDS: 15 00”, 22 99, NE Guadalcanal, Vovota,
20.1.1995, R. Wylie et al., bred from Cerbera manghas, SI 0674 (QDPI).
Comments. Known previously only from the holotype and allotype from an
unspecified locality (Malloch 1939, Hardy 1983). The above series was bred
from the fruit of Cerbera manghas (Apocynaceae).
Euphranta variabilis (Kertész)
Material examined. AUSTRALIA: 1 9, N Queensland, I km N of ‘Eclectus’, Iron
Range, 12°45°45”S, 143917'11”E, 12.vii.1977, G. & A. Daniels (UQIC). PAPUA
NEW GUINEA: 1 0, Morobe Province, Labu-butu area, Markam River, 6.x.1999, S.
Balagawi/ S. Sar, cue lure P429 (QDPI).
Comments. The above localities are additional to the few previously recorded
for this species (Hardy 1983, Permkam and Hancock 1995). The host plant
remains unknown.
Fig. 7. Euphranta sp. indet., wing.
Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3) 101
Euphranta sp. indet.
(Fig. 7)
Material examined. PAPUA NEW GUINEA: 1 9, Central Province, Paga Hill, Port
Moresby, 16.iv.1967, Sir Alan Mann (QDPI).
Comments. This species appears to be related to E. latifasciata Hardy but the
thorax is entirely orange-yellow, the abdomen red-brown and the basal wing
band yellow. The head is missing and the specimen too badly damaged to
describe.
Hardyadrama presignis (Hardy)
Material examined. AUSTRALIA: 1 9, Torres Strait, Saibai I., 10.xii.2002, N.
Mosby, in ME lure trap (AQIS, Mareeba).
Comments. The above is the second record of this species from Australia,
being recorded previously from Warraber (Sue) I., also in Torres Strait
(Permkam and Hancock 1995),
Tribe HEXACHAETINI
Callistomyia flavilabris Hering
Material examined. PAPUA NEW GUINEA: 2 CO, 9 99, Madang Province,
Baitabag, 28.vi.2000, bred from Wenzelia dolichophylla, M 119; 1 9, same data
except 13.vi.2001, M 1498 (all QDPI).
Comments. Previously recorded from Misool (Maluku Province, Indonesia)
and newly recorded from Papua New Guinea. A dark brown facial spot is
present or absent and this species differs from C, pavonina Bezzi in having
the large oval wing spot shallower, not extensive in cell r»,3. In C. horni
Hendel this large oval spot is distinctly connected to the transverse band
behind it. The above series was bred from the fruit of Wenzelia dolichophylla
(Rutaceae).
Callistomyia horni Hendel
Material examined. AUSTRALIA: 1 0%, Western Australia, Augustus I., 17.iii.2002,
A. Postle (AQIS, Broome). PAPUA NEW GUINEA: 1 g, 1 9, Central Province, 20
km SE Port Moresby, 11.iii.1983 & 26.i.1985, J.W. Ismay; 1 &, Burns Peak, Port
Moresby, 2.v.1971, J. Pippet (all QDPI); 1 &, 1 9, Central Province, Hall Sound [near
Yule Island], McL. (UQIC).
Comments. This species is newly recorded from Western Australia. It is
widespread in northern Australia but in Papua New Guinea all known records
emanate from Central Province in the south.
Tribe RIVELLIOMIMINI
Ornithoschema queenslandense Permkam & Hancock
Material examined. AUSTRALIA: 1 d, N Queensland, East Claudie River, Iron
Range, 1.i.1996, 20 m, G. & A. Daniels (UQIC); 2 99, N Queensland, 16°40’S,
145°34’E, 10 km NW Ellis Beach, 20.iv.1997, C.J. Burwell (QMB).
102 Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3)
Comments. The host plant of this endemic Australian species remains
unknown.
Tribe TRYPETINI
Aciuropsis pusio Hardy
(Fig. 8)
Material examined. AUSTRALIA: 1 9, N Queensland, Tully, 21.vi.1939, H.J. Turner
(QMB).
Comments. This distinctive, small black species is newly recorded from
Australia, being known previously from the Philippines and Papua New
Guinea. It is easily recognised by the wing pattern (Fig. 8) and presence of
only 2 scutellar setae, the apical pair lacking. Aciuropsis Hardy was placed in
tribe Trypetini by Han (1999). For a description and further illustrations see
Hardy (1987). Host plants are unknown.
Calosphenisca ndomae sp. n.
(Fig. 9)
Type. Holotype 9, SOLOMON ISLANDS: NW Guadalcanal, Ndoma, 13.v.1997, R.
Hollingsworth, bred ex Polygata paniculata, SI 2063 (in QMB, Reg. No. T 99078).
Description. Female (Fig. 9). Length of body (excluding oviscape) 4.6 mm;
of wing 4.5 mm. Head higher than long, fulvous except face with greyish
sheen and upper occiput red-brown. Antennae yellow; third segment abraded.
Frons with a black circular mark medially; 3 pairs of frontal setae and 2 pairs
of black orbital setae; ocellars abraded. Postocular row of setae black and
thin; genal seta well developed.
Thorax blackish-brown; anepisternum broadly white; scutellum white.
Postpronotal lobes dark fulvous to brown; notopleura brown. With a full
complement of black setae; dorsocentrals and prescutellar acrostichals
present; 1 strong and 1 weak anepisternal setae; 4 scutellars. Haltere with
fulvous stalk and white knob. Legs mostly fulvous; hind tibiae fuscous; mid
tibia fuscous basally and with an apical black spine.
Wing hyaline with an extensive brown pattern; cell bc hyaline except very
pale brown basally and dark brown at apex; cell c brown with 2 hyaline
indentations across it; pterostigma brown; a broad basal brown area curved
distally from apex of pterostigma to enclose R-M crossvein, intersected by a
narrow hyaline band from basal indentation in cell c to wing margin at apex
of vein A,+Cu and with a small hyaline spot in cell br below pterostigma;
alula and anal lobe hyaline; a narrow brown costal band from a little beyond
apex of pterostigma to wing apex in cell m; an isolated narrow brown band
parallel to edge of basal dark area, from just above vein R4:5 to wing margin
in cell m, enclosing DM-Cu crosvein. Veins R; and R4;5 setose; R-M
crossvein near apex of cell dm, separated from DM-Cu crossvein by about its
own length; cell bcu with a narrow and acute apical extension.
Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3) 103
Figs 8-9. Trypetini. (8) Aciuropsis pusio, wing; (9) Calosphenisca ndomae sp. n.,
female.
104 Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3)
Abdomen oval, blackish-brown; tergite VI about as long as tergite V.
Oviscape short and conical, as long as tergite VI, 0.4 mm; aculeus not
exposed.
Host plant. The holotype was bred from the fruit of Polygala paniculata
(Polygalaceae).
Distribution. Known only from Guadalcanal, Solomon Islands.
Comments. C. ndomae closely resembles C. bicuneata (Hardy) from Papua
New Guinea. It differs in details of the wing pattern, particularly the costal
band, which runs along the costa in cell r; in C. ndomae and along vein R243
in C. bicuneata, and the isolated subapical band, which is elongate in C.
ndomae and short (beginning in cell m well below vein R4:5) in C. bicuneata.
The above host record is the first for the genus.
Calosphenisca unicuneata (Hardy)
Commenis. Fusciludia unicuneata was transferred to Calosphenisca Hendel
by Korneyev (1999) and Han (1999), following synonymy of the two genera.
This species is widespread in eastern Australia and Papua New Guinea
(Permkam and Hancock 1995),
Hemiristina pleomeles Permkam & Hancock
Material examined. SOLOMON ISLANDS: 1 9, Guadalcanal, Honiara, 10.viii.1994,
R. Wylie et al., bred ex Diplocyclos palmatus, SI 0120 (QDPI). VANUATU: 3 OG,
3 99, Efate, 27.vii.1995, M. Vagalo, host Dracaena sp., V 1434 (QDPI).
Comments. Described from Melville and Stephen Islands in northern
Australia (Permkam and Hancock 1995), this species is newly recorded from
Solomon Islands and Vanuatu. It was bred from Dracaena sp. (Agavaceae) in
Vanuatu but the above record from Diplocyclos palmatus (Cucurbitaceae) in
the Solomon Islands is likely to be an error.
Philophylla conjuncta (de Meijere)
Material examined. SOLOMON ISLANDS: 4 co, 3 99, NW Guadalcanal,
Kodovele, 19.xii.1996, R. Wylie et al., bred from Premna serratifolia (L.), SI 0449; 1
0, 2 99, NE Guadalcanal, Vulelua, 29.xii.1994, R. Wylie et al., SI 0541; 27 VV, 25
99, E Guadalcanal, Adeade, 11.ii.1997, R. Hollingsworth et al., ex Premna
corymbosa; 6 OG", 4 99, same data except 6.v.1997, E. Valenga & R. Hollingsworth,
SI 2043; 3 00, 3 99, Guadalcanal, Tambea, 13.11.1997, R. Hollingsworth, bred ex
Premna corymbosa, SI 1971 (all QDPI).
Comments. The above specimens were bred from the fruit of Premna
corymbosa and Pr. serratifolia (Verbenaceae). Malloch (1939) also recorded
the type series of P. apicifasciata (Malloch) [a synonym of P. conjuncta]
from Premna integrifolia [a synonym of Pr. serratifolia].
Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3) 105
Philophylla erebia (Hering)
Material examined. AUSTRALIA: 1 ©, Central Queensland, 25901719”S,
147°57’16”E, Carnarvon Nat. Park, Mt Moffatt section Rangers Station, 740 m, 16-
18.xi.1995, D. Yeates (UQIC).
Comments. The above locality is the first from central Queensland for this
species.
Philophylla fossata (Fabricius)
Material examined. AUSTRALIA: 1 0%, N Queensland, Iron Range, West Claudie
River, 5.xii.1985, D. Yeates, rainforest, at MV light (UQIC); 2 99, N Queensland,
16°02’S, 145°27’E, Daintree Nat. Park, Cape Tribulation area, malaise in rainforest
opening near Emmagen Creek, 2-4.vi.1997, J. & A. Skevington (UQIC); 1 9, Central
Queensland, 20°06’S, 147°49’E, Finley Creek, E base of Mt Abbott, 13.iv.1997, C.J.
Burwell (QMB).
Comments. The distribution of this widespread species is extended south from
Cairns (Permkam and Hancock 1995) to the Bowen district.
Philophylla humeralis (Hendel)
Material examined. AUSTRALIA: 1 0%, 1 9, N Queensland, 18°21’S, 146°20’E,
Hinchinbrook I., Sunken Reef Bay, 5 m, 20.iv.1999, S.G. Evans, rainforest (QMB).
Comments. The only previous Australian record for this species is Dunk
Island (Hancock 1995), also in northern Queensland.
Philophylla quadrata (Malloch)
Material examined. AUSTRALIA: 1 0’, N Queensland, Iron Range, West Claudie
River, 4.xii.1985, D. Yeates, rainforest (UQIC).
Comments. The above is the second Queensland record for this species,
described originally from the Solomon Islands.
Tribe XARNUTINI
Xarnuta confusa Malloch
Material examined. AUSTRALIA: 1 9, N Queensland, West Claudie River, 4 km SW
road junction, 12°44’S, 143°15’E, 26.xi.1986, G. Daniels & M.A. Schneider (UQIC).
Comments. Often referred to tribe Acanthonevrini (subfamily Phytalmiinae),
Xarnuta Walker was placed in subfamily Trypetinae, as currently defined, by
Hancock (1986) and Korneyev (1999). X. confusa appears to be widespread
in northern Queensland.
Xarnuta cribralis Hering
Material examined. PAPUA NEW GUINEA: 2 g'g, 1 8, Central Province, Hall
Sound [near Yule Island], McL. (UQIC).
Comments. The female, previously unknown, is similar in appearance to the
male.
106 Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3)
Acknowledgements
We thank Amy Lawson (Griffith University) for preparing the illustrations
and curators of the various institutions for access to material. Field work in
Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands and Vanuatu was carried out under the
auspices of ACIAR Project No. CS2/94/03 ‘Identification of pest fruit flies in
Vanuatu, Solomon Islands and Federated States of Micronesia’ and the
Regional Management of Fruit Flies in the Pacific Project.
References
HAN, H.-Y. 1999. Phylogeny and behavior in flies of the tribe Trypetini (Trypetinae). Pp 253-
297, in Aluja, M. and Norrbom, A.L. (eds), Fruit flies (Tephritidae): phylogeny and evolution
of behavior. CRC Press, Boca Raton; xviii + 944 pp.
HANCOCK, D.L. 1986. Classification of the Trypetinae (Diptera: Tephritidae), with a
discussion of the afrotropical fauna. Journal of the Entomological Society of Southern
Africa 49: 275-305.
HANCOCK, D.L. 1995. Philophylla humeralis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae: Trypetinae)
newly recorded from Australia. Australian Entomologist 22: 113-114.
HANCOCK, D.L. and DREW, R.A.I. 1994. Notes on some Pacific Island Trypetinae and
Tephritinae (Diptera: Tephritidae). Australian Entomologist 21: 21-30.
HANCOCK, D.L., HAMACEK, E.L., LLOYD, A.C. and ELSON-HARRIS, M.M. 2000. The
distribution and host plants of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Australia. Information Series
Q199067. Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane; iv + 75 pp.
HARDY, D.E. 1983. The fruit flies of the tribe Euphrantini of Indonesia, New Guinea, and
adjacent islands (Tephritidae: Diptera). International Journal of Entomology 25: 152-205.
HARDY, D.E. 1986. The Adramini of Indonesia, New Guinea and adjacent islands (Diptera:
Tephritidae: Trypetinae). Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society 27: 53-78.
HARDY, D.E. 1987. The Trypetini, Aciurini and Ceratitini of Indonesia, New Guinea and
adjacent islands of the Bismarks and Solomons (Diptera: Tephritidae: Trypetinae).
Entomography 5: 247-373.
KORNEYEV, V.A. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships among higher groups of Tephritidae. Pp
73-113, in Aluja, M. and Norrbom, A.L. (eds), Fruit flies (Tephritidae): phylogeny and
-evolution of behavior. CRC Press, Boca Raton; xviii + 944 pp.
MALLOCH, J.R. 1939. Solomon Islands Trypetidae. Annals and Magazine of Natural History
(11) 4: 228-278, pls x-xi.
PERMKAM, S. and HANCOCK, D.L. 1995. Australian Trypetinae (Diptera: Tephritidae).
Invertebrate Taxonomy 9: 1047-1209.
Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3): 107-114 107
A NEW SPECIES OF CICADETTA AMYOT (HEMIPTERA:
CICADIDAE) FROM QUEENSLAND, WITH NOTES ON ITS
CALLING SONG
LINDSAY W. POPPLE
Entomology Section, Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Qld 4101
(Current address: School of Life Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072)
Abstract
Cicadetta polita sp. n. is described from the Edungalba, Theodore, Taroom and Glenmorgan
districts in southern Queensland. It belongs to a little known species complex distributed
throughout inland Queensland. Known adult food plants include weeping myall (Acacia
pendula) and false sandalwood (Eremophila mitchellii). An analysis is given of the moderately
fast ticking song, specific to this taxon.
Introduction
Å new species of cicada collected in southern Queensland shows broad
similarities to some other Australian species currently placed in the genus
Cicadetta Amyot and it is on this basis that generic placement has been made.
Characteristics include a similar body shape (both sexes) and similar genital
structures in males. Moulds (1988) discussed the status of Cicadetta in
Australia and a generic review of the Australian cicada fauna is currently in
preparation (Moulds, in prep.).
The new species comprises part of an undescribed species complex that is
quite distinct from other members of the genus; however, as the remaining
members of this complex are not particularly well known at present, only one
species is documented here. Another representative of the complex, referred
to as Cicadetta sp. H, is illustrated in Popple and Strange (2002).
The type series is located in the following collections: QM — Queensland
Museum, Brisbane; LWP — L. W. Popple, Brisbane; AE — A. Ewart,
Caloundra; MSM — M. S. Moulds — Sydney; JTM — J. T. St. Leger Moss,
Capalaba.
Cicadetta polita sp. n.
(Figs 1-2)
Cicadetta sp. G; Popple and Strange, 2002.
Types. Holotype 6, QUEENSLAND: Myall Park, 6 km N Glenmorgan, SEQ, 27-
28.xii.2001, L. Popple, A. Strange (in Queensland Museum, Reg. no. T 108573).
Paratypes. 1 0, 259367S 149°46’E, 6 km N Taroom, 3.iii.1998, C.J. Burwell, S.G.
Evans; | 9, 2 km W Glenmorgan, 29.xii.2001, L. Popple, A. Strange (both QM); 3
Co, 3 99, 2 km W Glenmorgan, 29.xii.2001, L. Popple, A. Strange; (LWP); 3 OG,
Brigalow Res. Stn nr Theodore, nr dump, E. mitchellii, 19.xii.2000, A. E[wart],
24°49.47’S 149°48.04’E; 2 OG, 2 99, Brigalow Res. Stn nr Theodore, nr lake,
E[remophila] mitchellii, 19.xii.2000, A. E[wart], 24°49.42’S 149°47.97°E; 1 9,
Brigalow Res. Stn nr Theodore,. E. brigalow section, 19.xii.2000, A. E[wart],
24°48.85’S 149°47.48’E; 3 CC, 1 9 (damaged), Brigalow Res. Stn nr Theodore, nr
108 Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3)
lake, E. mitchellii, 20.xii.2000, A. E[ wart], 24°49.42’S 149°47.97’E; 10, 1 9, 2 km
W Glenmorgan, 29.xii.2001, L. Popple, A. Strange (all AE); 3 99, 3 km E of
Mourangee Hsd, nr Edungalba, 20.xi.1986, E.E. Adams; 1 0%, | 9, 3 km E of
Mourangee Hsd, 5.ii.1983, mainly on sandlewood, E.E. Adams; 8 99, “Mourangee”,
nr Edungalba, 5.ii.1983, 18.xii.1983 & 14.xii.1985, on sandlewood, E.E. Adams (all
MSM);1 0%, 19,2 km W Glenmorgan, 29.xii.2001, L. Popple, A. Strange (JTM).
Description of male (Fig. 1A). Head largely black; postclypeus shiny, barred
black, becoming pale brown towards lateral and posterior margins; black
along midline; anteclypeus shiny black, with a pale brown spot immediately
posterior to the postclypeus; rostrum medium brown anteriorly, extending
into black, pale brown at the apex. Dorsal surface of head shiny black, with
pink to red ocelli. Eyes medium-light to dark brown or reddish brown.
Antennae black, paler towards the apex; antennal lobes pale.
Fig. 1. Cicadetta polita. (A) male; (B) female. Approximately 2.4 x life size.
Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3) 109
Thorax with pronotum mainly shiny black; prescutum medium brown
surrounding midline; midline fascia pale brown to orange, not reaching
pronotal collar; pronotal collar pale brown to orange, with colouration
extending dorsolaterally either side of midline fascia in the form of two
‘wedges’. Mesonotum shiny black with inconspicuous dark brown dorso-
lateral and lateral fascia; cruciform elevation and fore wing basal membranes
orange-brown. Legs with coxae pale brown with prominent dark brown
longitudinal fasciae; femora pale brown with extensive dark brown
longitudinal fasciae, pale brown at base and apex; tibiae pale toward base and
apex, otherwise medium brown, spines dark brown; tarsi brown, becoming
darker brown towards apex of claws.
Wings with forewing costal veins pale brown, becoming darker distally from
the node; basal membranes bright orange with a contrasting dark brown spot
at the base of the clavus; veins CuA, CuP and the base of M pale brown; all
other veins medium brown to dark brown; veins CuA and M fused posterior
to apex of basal cell; basal cell noticeably obscured by a thickened CuA vein;
with eight apical cells (7 if aberrant). Hindwing with base of vein 1A and
much of 2A pale brown; other veins medium brown; plaga pale brown to
cream with medium brown median longitudinal fasciae; with six apical cells.
Tymbals (Fig. 2E) with five distinct tymbal ridges present, with three inter-
ridge sclerites; dorsal ridge and adjacent ridge comparatively short, not
separated by an inter-ridge sclerite, with a separate anterior ridge area; the
lower 2-3 ridges joined anteriorly; basal spur present. Opercula (Fig. 2F)
follows body axis and broadly sickle-shaped; yellow-brown, becoming darker at
anterior of flange; inwardly rounded termination.
Abdomen (Fig 2A) with tergite 2 shiny black, becoming medium brown
towards posterior; tergites 3-8 shiny black anteriorly, medium brown distally,
with a contrasting orange-brown posterior margin; sometimes with silver
pubescence laterally. Sternite 2 orange-brown with dark brown medial fascia
that broadens posteriorly; sternites 3 to 6 with prominent dark brown fascia
that becomes orange-brown towards anterior and posterior lateral margins;
sternite 7 brown to orange-brown, with broad dark brown medial fascia
terminating anteriorly; sternite 8 brown, with silver pubescence.
Genitalia (Figs 2B-D). Pygophore rich to pale brown, with darker lobes
having a rounded anterior-dorsal termination; uncal lobes prominent, deeply
bifurcate and directed ventrally, giving a ‘fanged’ appearance. Aedeagus
trifid with a dark brown anterior-dorsal ridge, prominent dorsal
pseudoparameres extending beyond endotheca and ventral pseudoparamere
slightly shorter than endotheca; dorsal pseudoparameres dark brown at base,
becoming lighter anteriorly and dorsally, transparent at apex; ventral
pseudoparamere near black, transparent at apex; endotheca cylindrical and
fleshy, pale brown to transparent, becoming darker brown ventrally;
gonocoxite IX dark to medium brown with two distinct anterior spurs.
110 Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3)
Fig. 2. Cicadetta polita male. (A) abdomen, viewed from left; (B) pygophore, viewed
laterally from left; (C) pygophore, viewed from posterior ventral side; (D) aedeagus,
lateral view of left side; (E) right tymbal; (F) left opercula. Scales = 1 mm.
Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3) 111
Female (Fig. 1B). Markings and coloration similar to male. Abdominal
segment 9 medium brown, becoming orange-brown towards posterior and
ventral region surrounding ovipositor sheath, with a pair of dark brown to
shiny black longitudinal dorsolateral fasciae that terminate short of apex; apex
dark brown and narrowed sharply into a spine; ovipositor sheath does not
extend noticeably beyond termination of abdomen.
Measurements (in mm; range with mean in parentheses: 5 males, 5 females).
Body length: male 14.3-14.9 (14.48); female 14.6-16.9 (16.32). Forewing
length: male 18.8-19.5 (19.18); female 20.4-22.0 (21.26). Head width: male
4.9-5.0 (4.94); female 5.1-5.3 (5.14). Pronotum width: male 4.3-4.6. (4.44);
female 4.6-4.8 (4.68). Abdomen width: male 4.5-4.7 (4.64); female 4.7-4.9
(4.78).
Etymology. Polita is the feminine derivative of the Latin politus, meaning
polished, smooth, refined. This refers to the shiny, polished appearance of the
insect.
Comments. C. polita can be distinguished from all previously described
members of the genus Cicadetta by the following two features on the wings: a
thickened CuA vein near the base, causing the basal cell to become obscured;
and a prominent, dark spot at the base of the clavus. Two undescribed species
that are closely related to C. polita, both in calling song type and morphology,
have been documented under the names Notopsalta sp. B (Ewart 1988, 1998,
Ewart and Popple 2000, Popple and Strange 2002) and Cicadetta sp. H
(Popple and Strange 2002). C. polita can be distinguished from Notopsalta
sp. B by the features listed above. Cicadetta sp. H has an obscured basal cell
and thickened CuA vein like C. polita, but lacks the dark spot at the base of
the clavus.
Distribution and habitat
Known from localities in the Glenmorgan district near Surat, from 6 km north
of Taroom, the DPI Brigalow Research Station near Theodore and the
Edungalba district in southern inland Queensland (Fig. 3). In the southern part
of its range the preferred adult food plants are weeping myall (Acacia
pendula) and false sandalwood (Eremophila mitchellii), especially where
both species occur near riverbeds. Adults have a tendency to sit on the inner
and outer branches where they are not particularly mobile, but will take flight
if disturbed (Popple and Strange 2002). Near Theodore, almost all specimens
were collected from E. mitchellii (A. Ewart, pers. comm.).
Calling song
Calling songs were recorded on a Sony MZR700 Minidisk recorder with a
digital Sony EC957 Electret Condenser Microphone at the Glenmorgan site
(LWP) and on a Sony WM-D6C cassette recorder at Brigalow Research
Station, Theodore site (A. Ewart). Oscillograms were generated using Cool
Edit and all calling songs were digitised at a 44.1 kHz sampling rate.
112 Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3)
* Theodore
aroom
Fig. 3. Distribution of Cicadetta polita: localities where specimens in the type series
were collected (A).
Song structure terminology follows Ragge and Reynolds (1998). The song
consists of two distinct phases (Fig. 4). Phase one (Figs 4A, 4C) consists of
monotonously repeated single phrases or echemes. Each echeme lasts for
approx. 0.05 s and there is a distinct 0.20-0.27 s period of silence between
each. The second phase (Figs 4B, 4D) is similar, but emitted at a much faster
rate. The echemes themselves are not shorter (approx. 0.04-0.06 s), but the
gap between echemes is greatly reduced to about equal the length of an
individual echeme (0.04-0.06 s). The song usually commences with the first
phase, but may alternate freely between the two phases during each song
burst. Sequences of each song phase may last for longer than 60 s, depending
on the weather conditions and the number of males calling.
The frequency range of the song from the recording at Myall Park,
Glenmorgan showed a broad-banded peak from 13-19 kHz with a further
superficial peak at 9-10 kHz. The specimen recorded near Theodore had a
similar broad peak spanning from 11-17 kHz. The two recordings showed
similarities in the extent of the dominant frequencies. Differences may have
been attributed to differences in recording equipment and/or processing
software.
Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3) 113
Fig. 4. Calling song of Cicadetta polita. (A) phase one of song recorded at Myall
Park, Glenmorgan; (B) phase two of song at same location; (C) phase one of song
recorded at Brigalow Research Station (A. Ewart); (D) phase two of song at same
location (A. Ewart). Each segment has a duration of 4 seconds.
Males sing most vigorously when there is sufficient sunlight during the
morning and late afternoon, avoiding the heat in the middle of the day. In
overcast weather, singing is sporadic and may occur at any time of day.
Singing males have been seen to aggregate in the presence of females.
Notopsalta sp. B has a similar song to C. polita, with similar repetitive
phrases; however, the echemes themselves are much longer (0.18-0.22 s) and
are sporadically interspersed with a short phrase (0.06-0.08 s) followed by a
long phrase (0.32-0.34 s) comprising four coupled echemes. The song is
114 Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3)
illustrated in Ewart (1988). The dominant frequency range extends from 14-
15 kHz (Ewart and Popple 2000).
The calling song of Cicadetta sp. H shows a similar broad-band frequency
range to C. polita. However, the structure of the two songs is entirely
different. Cicadetta sp. H. produces regular phrases that consist of a closely
emitted group of echemes; its song is illustrated in Popple and Strange
(2002).
Acknowledgements
I wish to extend deep gratitude to Geoff Thompson for his advice and
assistance with scientific illustration. Sincere thanks to Tony Ewart for
providing song recordings, discussing the general ecology of the species and
for commenting on the manuscript, and Max Moulds for critical comments
and for retrieving paratype data from his extensive collection. Also, many
thanks are due to Gimme Walter for providing suggestions and for
commenting on the initial draft of the manuscript.
References
EWART, A. 1988. Cicadas (Homoptera). Pp 180-201, in Scott, G. (ed.), Lake Broadwater. The
natural history of an inland lake and its environs. Lake Broadwater Natural History Association
and Darling Downs Institute Press; 344 pp.
EWART, A. 1998. Cicadas, and their songs, of the Miles-Chinchilla region. Queensland
Naturalist 36(4-6): 54-72.
EWART, A. and POPPLE, L.W. 2001. Cicadas, and their songs, from southwestern Queensland.
Queensland Naturalist 39(4-6): 52-71.
MOULDS, M.S. 1988. The status of Cicadetta and Melampsalta (Homoptera: Cicadidae) in
Australia with the description of a new species. General and Applied Entomology 20: 39-48.
MOULDS, M.S. 1990. Australian cicadas. New South Wales University Press, Kensington; 217
pp.
POPPLE, L.W. and STRANGE, A.D. 2002. Cicadas, and their songs, from the Tara and Warroo
Shires, southern central Queensland. Queensland Naturalist 40(1-3): 15-30.
RAGGE, D.R. and REYNOLDS, W.J. 1998. The songs of the grasshoppers and crickets of
Western Europe. Harley books, Colchester, in association with The Natural History Museum,
London; 591 pp.
Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3): 115-122 115
A SECOND NEW SPECIES OF GNATHOTHLIBUS WALLENGREN
(LEPIDOPTERA: SPHINGIDAE) FROM VANUATU
R.B. LACHLAN and M.S. MOULDS
Entomology Department, Australian Museum, 6 College St, Sydney, NSW 2010
Abstract
Gnathothlibus vanuatuensis sp. n. is described from Vanuatu and distinguished from G. erotus
(Cramer) and the sympatric G. saccoi Lachlan & Moulds (= G. malleti Schmit).
Introduction
Six species and one subspecies of Gnathothlibus Wallengren have been
described from the Asia-Pacific region. D’Abrera (1987) recorded G. erotus
erotus (Cramer) from Sri Lanka east to the Indonesian islands of Sumatra,
Java, Borneo and Sulawesi and north to the Philippines. Moulds (1986)
recorded it from Christmas Island (Indian Ocean). G. erotus eras (Boisduval)
is widespread from the Australian region to Tahiti. G. meeki (Rothschild &
Jordan) and G. heliodes (Meyrick) are recorded from New Guinea and G.
brendelli Hayes from Sulawesi (D’Abrera 1987). G. dabrera Eitschberger
was also recorded from Sulawesi by Eitschberger (1999). G. saccoi Lachlan
& Moulds (= malleti Schmit (Schmit 2003)) was recorded from Vanuatu by
Lachlan and Moulds (2001) and Schmit (2002).
An undescribed species, similar to but clearly different from G. erotus (and
previously confused with it), was collected in Vanuatu on the islands of
Espiritu Santo, Malekula, Ambrym and Tanna during 1987-1989, and 2000.
Schmit (2002) also recorded it (as G. erotus eras) from Efaté. It is described
below. Placement of this new species in Gnathothlibus complies with the
wing colouration and the generic diagnosis given by D'Abrera (1987).
Gnathothlibus vanuatuensis sp. n.
(Figs 1-2, 5-6, 9-10, 13)
Types. Holotype 0", VANUATU: Lowanatom, Tanna I., 8.xii.2000, R.B. Lachlan (in
Australian National Insect Collection, CSIRO, Canberra [ANIC]). Paratypes: 2 OG,
3 99, Port Olry, Espiritu Santo I., 4, 7, 22.1.1988 & 16.i.1989, R.B. Lachlan; 10 OG,
7 99, Luganville, Espritu Santo I., 15, 21.xii.1987, R.B. Lachlan; 1 0, Vao I., 0.5 km
off NE coast of Malekula I., 15.i.1989, R.B. Lachlan; 24 (0, 10 99, Olal Mission
area, north Ambrym I., 22.xii.1988, 7, 11.i.1989 & 19, 20, 23-28.ix.1989, R.B.
Lachlan; 9 CO, 2 99, Lowanatom, Tanna I., 4, 5, 8, 9.xii.2000, R.B. Lachlan (in
ANIC, Australian Museum, Sydney and RBL collection).
Description. Male (Figs 1-2). Forewing length 37.5-43 mm. Antenna dark
creamy-brown above, brown below; palpi dark brown above, contrasting off-
white with some dark scales below; dorsal surface of head, thorax and
abdomen uniform, medium brown; small dark median spot on prothorax; thin
lateral creamy-brown stripe from base of antenna to posterior of thorax.
Thorax ventrally with wide creamy-brown patch immediately posterior to
palpi, remainder of band suffused heavily with brown to base of metathorax.
116 Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3)
Figs 1-4. Gnathothlibus spp., males. (1-2) G. vanuatuensis, holotype: (1) MS
(2) underside. (3-4) G. erotus eras: (3) upperside; (4) underside.
Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3) 117
Figs 5-8. Gnathothlibus spp., females. (5-6) G. vanuatuensis, paratype: (5) upperside;
(6) underside. (7-8) G. erotus eras: (7) upperside; (8) underside.
118 Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3)
Abdominal segments laterally each with reddish-brown posterior margin
contrasting with brown ground colour; abdomen with five small lateral black
spots, surrounded by white. Fore tibiae covered in creamy-brown hair scales
tinged with pink; fore tarsi without hair scales.
Forewing upperside as in Fig. 1; ground colour brown (slightly deeper olive-
brown in fresh specimens) with darker markings; small black stigma with
browny-white centre at end of discal cell; irregular lighter brown marginal
band from apex to tornus, edged by a slightly curved oblique dark line from
apex to vein Mı; a prominent dark, mostly straight, post median line runs
from costa, where it is curved slightly distally, to inner margin; a short,
irregular, slightly darker subbasal band, curved distally from costa to the dark
basal patch below vein 1A+2A, edged on each side by darker, irregular lines.
Forewing underside as in Fig. 2; ground colour burnt orange, lighter and
without markings basad; speckled with dark brown distally; stigma usually
very faint; a dark, straight subterminal line angled inwardly from apex to vein
M; then irregular to tornus; two dark parallel post median lines from costa to
vein CuA», the distal line more prominent, these median and post median
lines can be fainter and reach only vein Rs in some specimens.
Hindwing upperside as in Fig. 1; ground colour orange; a slightly variable,
dark brown terminal band from apex to tornus at least 2 mm wide at vein M3,
thinnest at apex; inner margin of band irregular and suffused with orange
scales. Hindwing underside as in Fig. 2; ground colour light orange-brown;
heavily speckled with dark brown; marginal area darker from apex to tornus;
dark, mostly straight submedian band, thickest at costa, curving proximad
from costa to vein 1A+2A and touching distal edge of cell; a less prominent
parallel dark post median band of spots to veins Rs or M;, in many specimens
this line also reaches vein I A+2A.
Male genitalia (Figs 9-10). Uncus in lateral view longish slender, parallel
sided, gently arched, distally enlarged with small dark ventral tooth and small
dorsal crest, distal margin slightly convex; gnathos in lateral view thin,
straight, gradually tapering to a small upturned point; in dorsal view gnathos
is wide, with a slight incurve at attachment point to tegumen, distally tapering to
a point with curved sides; valva gently convex at ventral margin, dorsal
margin tending straight then slightly convex, distally rounded; sacculus
process robust, distal end dark, spine-like, upturned; aedeagus in lateral view
with end tapered to a rounded apex with dorsal backward directed barb, with
a smaller ventral barb a little proximad of dorsal barb.
Female (Figs 5-6). Forewing length 39.5-48.8 mm. Head and tegulae dark
brown. Median area of thorax and abdomen above uniform medium brown.
Abdomen below reddish-brown with contrasting darker brown markings. Fore
tibiae as in male, covered in long cream hair scales, suffused with pink on
anterior edge and darker at distal end of posterior edge; fore tarsi as in male,
without hair scales.
Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3) 119
Forewing upperside as in Fig. 5; ground colour and pattern in shades of
brown, darker and more prominent than male; small black stigma with light
centre at end of discal cell. Forewing underside similar to male but ground
colour medium orange-brown, tending pinker along distal edges; stigma not
visible; distinctly speckled with dark brown distally, with two dark parallel
post median lines from costa to at least vein M}, often reaching vein CuA».
Hindwing upperside similar to male but dark brown terminal band broader,
with inner margin fairly straight in most specimens and suffused with orange
scales; this band normally terminates at tornus at vein 1A+2A, its inner
margin not running basad along this vein further than the brown band along
vein CuA». Hindwing underside ground colour same as forewing but more
heavily speckled with dark brown; yellowish streak along vein I A+2A.
Female genitalia. Apophyses posteriores long, very slender, minutely
enlarged subapically; apophyses anteriores spatulate on distal half, signum
very long and narrow, extending full length of corpus bursae and consisting of
a pair of closely parallel lines of cornuti.
10
12
Figs 9-12. Male genitalia of Gnathothlibus spp. (9-10) G. vanuatuensis paratype,
Tanna I.: (9) genitalia in situ but with left valva removed, lateral view; (10) gnathos,
dorsal view; (11-12) G. erotus eras, Julatten, north Queensland: (11) genitalia in situ
but with left valva removed, lateral view; (12) gnathos, dorsal view.
120 Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3)
Etymology. The specific name vanuatuensis is derived from the island nation
of Vanuatu, the only known locality for the species.
Distribution. At present G. vanuatuensis is known from the islands of Espiritu
Santo, Vao (just off Malekula), Ambrym, Efaté and Tanna. Specimens were
first collected in December 1987 and January 1988 on Espiritu Santo and
subsequently in January and September 1989 on Ambrym and January 1989
on Vao. In December 2000, many specimens were taken on Tanna in southern
Vanuatu. Schmit (2002) recorded it from Efaté in April and May.
Discussion
Gnathothlibus vanuatuensis most closely resembles G. erotus eras, the
common subspecies occurring in Australia, Papua New Guinea, Solomon
Islands (Tennent 1999) and New Caledonia to Tahiti. G. vanuatuensis is
readily distinguished from both G. saccoi (see Lachlan and Moulds 2001) and
G. erotus eras (Figs 3-4, 7-8, 11-12, 14) by the complete absence of any long
hair scales on the fore tarsi and a clear reduction in length and thickness of
the long hair scales covering the fore tibiae in males (Fig. 13).
Both sexes of G. vanuatuensis have consistent, more prominent forewing
markings than G. erotus and in this respect are similar to G. saccoi. Clark
(1922) described subspecies G. erotus cramptoni Clark from Guam based
primarily on this character but Kitching and Cadiou (2000) synonymised it
because other Pacific Island populations are known to exhibit strong forewing
markings.
The forewing stigma on both sexes of G. vanuatuensis is more evident than
generally seen on G. erotus, where it is usually reduced or absent. The males
of G. vanuatensis are slightly smaller than those of G. erotus but females are
clearly smaller. The dark brown terminal band on the hindwing of males of G.
vanuatuensis is wider than in G. erotus eras; in females the inner margin of
this band does not run basad along vein I A+2A, as often occurs in G. erotus
eras females; the median line on forewing upperside, distal of stigma, is
straighter and less curved near costa than in G. erotus; the oblique band
bordered distally by this median line and encasing the stigma is clearly
narrower where it reaches the inner margin than in G. erotus.
Some specimens of G. vanuatuensis exhibit a general greenish tinge on the
forewing upperside, as in G. saccoi, but this tinge is not seen in G. erotus. On
the forewing underside of G. vanuatuensis, two dark-spotted, median, oblique
lines are usually visible from costa to vein M;, sometimes extending to the
termen in heavily marked specimens; these lines are generally vestigial or
missing in G. erotus eras. On the hindwing underside there is one, often two,
oblique, brown, speckled, parallel lines from costa to vein CuA», the median
line touching the apex of the discal cell; in G. erotus these two lines are
usually vestigial or missing and clearly distad compared with those of G.
vanuatuensis.
Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3) 121
Figs 13-14. Micrographs of Gnathothlibus spp., fore tarsi and tibiae of males showing
leg scales. (13) G. vanuatuensis; (14) G. erotus eras.
The thorax of G. vanuatuensis has in males, ventrally, creamy-brown pilosity
suffused with brown scales; this is whiter and more extensive towards the
abdomen in G. erotus.
The male genitalia of G. vanuatuensis (Figs 9-10) differ from those of G.
erotus (Figs 11-12) in lateral view in having a shorter uncus. The posterior
margin of the tegumen of G. vanuatuensis is straighter and slightly indented
as in G. saccoi (clearly curved in G. erotus). The upper margin of each valva
of G. vanuatuensis is nearly straight basally with a slight upward curve
distally (this curve is much more distinct in G. erotus). In dorsal view (Fig.
10) the gnathos of G. vanuatuensis is slightly wider with curved edges
tapering to a point distally; the incurve at attachment is greater in G. erotus
and the sides are straighter as they taper to a point (Fig. 12). In G. saccoi the
apex of the uncus in lateral view is dorsally rounded rather than crested and
the sacculus of each valva is much broader (Lachlan and Moulds 2001).
G. saccoi is the only other species of Gnathothlibus recorded from Vanuatu.
Previous records of G. erotus eras from Esperitu Santo, Ambrym and Efaté
(Lachlan and Moulds 2001, Schmit 2002) are based on misidentifications of
G. vanuatuensis.
122 Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3)
Acknowledgements
We sincerely thank the late Father Albert Sacco for inviting RBL to stay at his
missions at Port Olry on Espiritu Santo, Olal on Ambrym and Lowanatom on
Tanna during collecting trips, as well as his companionship over all these
years. He passed away on 29 January 2002, aged 81 years. For comments on
the manuscript we sincerely thank Dr Ian Common (Honorary Research
Fellow, CSIRO, Canberra). For the photographs and scanning electron
micrographs we thank Stewart Humphreys and Sue Lindsay respectively
(both Australian Museum). We also thank Deborah Lachlan for typing the
manuscript.
References
CLARK, B.P. 1922. Twenty-five new Sphingidae. Proceedings of the New England Zoological
Club 8: 1-23.
D’ABRERA, B. [1987]. Sphinidae Mundi, hawk moths of the world. Based on a checklist by
Alan Hayes and the collection in the British Museum (Natural History). E.W. Classey,
Faringdon; ix + 226 pp.
EITSCHBERGER, U. 1999. Zwei neue Schwarmerarten von den Insel Sulawesi (Lepidoptera:
Sphingidae). Entomologische Zeitschrift 109(5): 182-191.
KITCHING, LJ. and CADIOU, J.-M. 2000. Hawkmoths of the world. An annotated and
illustrated revisionary checklist (Lepitoptera: Sphingidae). Cornell University Press; viii + 226
pp.
LACHLAN, R.B. and MOULDS, M.S. 2001. A new species of Gnathothlibus Wallengren
(Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) from Vanuatu. Australian Entomologist 28(4): 123-128.
MOULDS, M.S. 1986. The hawk moths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) of Christmas Island, Indian
Ocean. Australian Entomological Magazine 13(3-4): 37-40.
SCHMIT, P. 2002. Un nouveau Sphingide de Vanuatu: Gnathothlibus malleti n. sp.
(Lepidoptera, Sphingidae). Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France 107(5): 525-528.
SCHMIT, P. 2003. Note synonymique sur Gnathothlibus saccoi Lachlan & Moulds, 2001, et G.
malleti Schmit, 2002 (Lep., Sphingidae). Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France
108(2): 156.
TENNENT, W.J. 1999. An annotated checklist of the hawkmoths of the Solomon Islands and
Bougainville (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae). Lambillionea 99(1): 7-20, (2): 295-308.
Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3): 123-134 123
CLARIFICATION OF THE NESTING BEHAVIOUR OF PODALONIA
TYDEI SUSPICIOSA (SMITH) (HYMENOPTERA: SPHECIDAE)
BASED ON FURTHER OBSERVATIONS AT CASTLECLIFF
BEACH, NEW ZEALAND
ANTHONY C. HARRIS
Otago Museum, PO Box 6202, Dunedin North, New Zealand
Abstract
Use of plant and dead animal material in the final stages of nest closure in Podalonia tydei
suspiciosa (Smith) is recorded for 16 out of 17 nests studied. One individual used sand only to
close the nest. Females cradled caterpillar prey with the forelegs. Female nesting behaviour,
nests and cell size and shape were variable. Nests were made either before or after prey was
captured. Nest cells were constructed in dry loose sand. All other sand-nesting solitary wasps
nesting in the area constructed nest-cells in firm, moist sand. Tachysphex nigerrimus (Smith)
(Larridae) competed with P. t. suspiciosa for nests, even usurping those of the latter, which it
would then extend into firm, slightly moist sand. A number of mistakes in previous publications
on the biology of P. t. suspiciosa are corrected.
Introduction
Podalonia tydei Fernald has a wide distribution in Southern Europe, Asia,
North Africa, Australia and New Zealand, the subspecies P. t. suspiciosa
(Smith) occurring only in Australia and New Zealand (Bohart and Menke
1976). Single-celled nests, containing one paralysed noctuid caterpillar, are
made in loose sand.
Ethological data were summarised by Harris (2001) who, while primarily
describing the larva, gave an account of nesting behaviour in P. t. suspiciosa
on Castlecliff Beach (Wanganui, New Zealand), during late December 2000
to January 2001. In that study, females were not observed to cradle
caterpillars, as had previously been observed in the Bay of Plenty (Harris
1994) and plant material was not used in nest closures, as had been reported
by McCarthy (1917). Neither were females observed to use a stone to tamp
down the nest closure, as had been reported in Australia by Chandler (1926),
Bristowe (1971) and Rayment (1935). During the 2000-01 summer, my
attention was at times diverted to other solitary wasps being studied and I
sometimes interrupted final closure and disguising of the nest in order to more
easily extract the prey and egg undamaged. Consequently, some details of
final closure were probably missed.
The following summer, I revisited the Castlecliff sand dunes study area daily
from 31 December 2001 until 31 January 2002. In this present study, 17 nests
were observed until they were provisioned, closed and disguised and 32 prey
items were observed being carried by females. Continuous, daily observations
for a little over a month resolved some of the puzzling features of previous
studies and provided a clear interpretation of the distinctive final closure of
the nest.
124 Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3)
Methods
Thirty-two individual wasps were followed and 17 burrows were excavated
when nesting by the wasp was completed. All observations were recorded in
field notebooks 57-60 (currently held by the author). Prey and eggs were
placed on top of sand pressed into 35 mm plastic film canisters, which were
placed into sealed jars filled with sand. The jars, with a thermometer beside
them, were kept at 33-37°C on top of a hot water cylinder in a warming
cupboard in a house, as described by Harris (2001). Larvae and prepupae
were fixed in van Emden’s larval fixative then stored in 75% ethanol.
All observations were made in the area of sand dunes at Castlecliff Beach,
Wanganui, New Zealand, described by Harris (2001).
Observations and results
Mating
All matings observed resembled those described by Harris (1994).
Adult feeding
Adults took nectar frequently from flowers of catsear (Hypochaeris radicata
Linnaeus), sweet alyssum (Lobularia maritima (Linnaeus) Desvaux) and
cineraria (Percallis x hybrida R. Nordenstam).
Hunting and prey species
Hunting and prey species were as reported by Harris (1994, 2001). Final
instar larvae of Agrotis innominata Hudson (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) were
taken and were abundant both in the areas where the wasps were nesting and
where they were capturing prey.
Prey capture and paralysis
Prey capture and paralysis resembled that described by Harris (1994, 2001)
except that two individuals, after stinging the prey to paralysis, subsequently
bit and squeezed the area near the mouthparts and on the underside of the
head and prosternum. The wasps may have been crushing the pharyngeal
ganglia. One female appeared to feed from the prey’s mouthparts, in the
manner of a pompilid, but this may have been behaviour associated with
crushing the pharyngeal ganglia and was most likely to prevent the caterpillar
from disgorging a strong-smelling dark liquid from its mouth.
Prey carriage
In all cases, prey was held supine, facing forward, by the mandibles and
cradled with the prothoracic legs, as described by Harris (1994) (Figs la-f).
This was so for both large and small prey. No individual was observed to
carry prey in the manner described by Harris (2001), except for one
specimen, briefly, when it attempted to push a very large larva that it
temporarily could not move. At that time, all its tarsi were in contact with the
ground. During normal transport, mid legs alternately reach forward well
beyond the forelegs, which tightly cradle the prey (Figs 1b, c, e, f).
Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3) 125
Fig. 1. Prey carriage by P. t. suspiciosa: (a), by beating its wings, this individual was
able to move a large prey item rapidly; note that the prey is grasped by the mandibles
and fore legs; normally, the wings remain folded over the wasp’s back; (b), a smaller
prey item; note how the wasp’s right mid-leg reaches out forward of the fore leg,
which grips the prey; (c), large prey carried in the typical manner; (d), prey is gripped
by mandibles, forelegs move up to raise prey; (e), mid legs move over fore legs;
(f), showing how the wasp balances on its mid and hind legs; (b, c, e & f) show
typical prey carriage, cradled by forelegs; (g), positioning prey prone over an aerial
root; (h), prey, placed prone over a plant stem, was partly covered with sand, then
wasp visited a burrow dug the previous day;. (i), two of the five closely-grouped
burrows associated with this nest. Scale in mm, applicable only to (i).
126 Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3)
Hiding prey
Wasps ran a few centimetres, then hung the caterpillar prone (dorsum up),
never supine, over a leaf or a low plant, or over an exposed, horizontal root
(Fig. 1g), or placed it under a leaf. When the caterpillar had been hung over a
root or stem, some wasps would often turn away from it and kick sand over it
with the forelegs, partially covering it with sand (Fig. 1h).
Abandonment of prey
Five paralysed, seemingly suitable prey were abandoned, supine, on warm
sand during the study period. A sixth was abandoned when it expired after
having being been pushed into an area of intensely hot sand in front of the
burrow.
Digging the nest
All nests were shallow, single-celled, dug with both the burrow and the
terminal cell completely surrounded by dry, loose, sand. Additional burrows,
and “false” burrows were dug as described by Harris (1994, 2001).
One individual dug 2 burrows on 9 January 2002 and a third burrow on 10
January. The wasp then captured and paralysed a final instar 4. innominata
caterpillar, hauled it forward with the mandibles and cradled by the forelegs,
supine (venter up), and placed it twice, prone (dorsum up), on a horizontal
root. The wasp ran back to the first nest it had made the previous day (9
January), then returned to the caterpillar, turned it supine and commenced
dragging it towards this old burrow. It next hid the caterpillar, positioned
prone under a leaf, 30 cm from the old burrow, to which it returned and
started digging inside it for 13 seconds, presumably preparing a cell for the
large prey (33.8 mm long). It then returned to the caterpillar and dragged it
supine, head first into the mouth of the burrow and left it with the posterior
abdominal segments exposed. The wasp then ran into the burrow under the
caterpillar, which disappeared a few seconds later into the burrow.
The main burrow of all 17 nests excavated was 9-10.4 mm wide and 38-86
(mean: 64) mm deep, the cell being 17-56 (mean: 31) mm long. There were 2-
6 “false” nests (Fig. 11) as described by Harris (1994, 2001).
Orientation of prey within the nest
The caterpillar in the nest cell was sometimes coiled on its side in a “C”
(sometimes a very loosely-coiled “C”), with the head and anus both facing the
entrance. In two nests, the caterpillar was placed in the cell uncurled, supine
and straight, with the head facing the end (apex) of the cell and the anus
facing the nest entrance; part of the prey in these two nests extended out of
the cell and along the main burrow (Figs 2a-d).
Oviposition
The egg (Fig. 3a) was laid laterally on the 2nd, 3rd or 4th abdominal segment.
Exceptionally, one individual oviposited on the 1st abdominal segment.
Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3) 127
Fig. 2. Four nests of P. t. suspiciosa made in loose dry sand at Castlecliff Beach in
January, 2002. Note that in (a), the prey is extended straight, whereas it is curled into
a “C” in the other nests (b-d). In (d), a forked twig, of which the three points extended
outside the diameter of the burrow, was positioned 7 mm below the mouth of the
burrow and more sand kicked over that and compacted by the wasp with its frons.
Key to numbers: 1, Initial sand closure. 2, Fragment of organic material. 3, Final sand
closure. 4, Disguising sand kicked over burrow from several directions which
camouflages the entrance and is not compacted with the front of the head.
Life history
Of 12 eggs on prey kept at 32-35°C, four subsequent larvae (Figs 3b-c) took
six days to finish feeding and begin producing silk. (This constant high
temperature is not attained in nature, where development is slower.) Pleural
lobes were small in the final larva and large in the prepupa (Fig. 3c).
Nest closure
Between 63 and 76 seconds after entering the nest with the caterpillar (during
which time oviposition on the caterpillar occurred), the female ran out 83-89
mm from the main entrance and, facing away from the burrow, kicked sand
beneath itself with synchronous thrusts of the forelegs, the gaster being raised
as sand passed beneath it then lowered.
128 Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3)
Fig. 3. Life history stages of P. t. suspiciosa: (a), egg; (b), first instar larva; (c), two
mature larvae. In (c), the top larva has just finished eating its prey; the pleural lobes
are small and rounded; the larva at bottom had just started producing its first 5 mm of
silk; note that the pleural lobes are much larger. (Photographed 1 day after fixing in
van Emden’s larval fixative). All scale bars = 4 mm.
The wasp sent sand showering into the burrow for 8-11 seconds, then turned
around, ran into the burrow and rammed sand with the front of its head
(walking back and forwards, pushing sand with the front of its head and not
vibrating its whole body) for about 8 seconds. Then the wasp reappeared, ran
about 80 mm from the burrow entrance and, facing out, kicked in more sand
beneath itself for about 6 seconds. Then it turned around, ran into the burrow
Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3) 129
and rammed sand for about 4 seconds. It alternated between running out and
kicking sand into the burrow for 4-16 seconds and turning around and rushing
back to pound sand with its frons for 3-5 seconds. It made 8-17 (mean: 9)
trips out and back. Each time, after the wasp had finished compacting sand
with the front of its head inside the nest, it ran out backwards, pygidium first,
the opposite way to a pompilid and many other solitary wasps which run out
head first. As it dug, the meso- and metathoracic legs scrabbled to keep
balance while the forelegs worked synchronously together, to scoop out sand
and send it flying out under the gaster. As each shower of sand grains flew
under the wasp, it raised then lowered its gaster, which bobbed continually up
and down.
When the sand closure was about 7 mm from the surface, the female
invariably ran out and looked for a small piece of dry stem, a leaf or similar
organic object and placed it in the mouth of the burrow. It then ran out of the
burrow, faced out and kicked in more sand beneath itself, turned around, ran
back and compacted the sand with its head. When the sand closure reached
the sand surface, the wasp disguised the nest for 77-86 seconds by sending
sand showering over the nest from several directions, starting 142-157 mm
from the burrow entrance (Fig. 2a-d).
ee oe oe oe oe ee ee TA
A ~
pripevnenia Ĉ LSAS I
' A
|
|
i) > SN
i
a
nå HAMAS ee =
Fig. 4. Single items of organic material (a-i) from each of 9 nests of P. t. suspiciosa,
positioned about 7 mm below burrow entrance. The wasp that placed item (d) in a
nest seemed at first to be compacting soil with it, but inspection with a lens revealed
that it was not. The same wasp used a forked twig, item (e), which was much wider
than the diameter of the burrow, in its next nest. Items (a, b & d) are roundish wood,
(c, g h) are dried lupin leaflets, (i) is a piece of rotten wood and (f) is a hard, dried,
lepidopterous caterpillar. All scales are in mm.
130 Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3)
Organic material used in final closure of burrow
Only one individual did not use organic material (Figs 4a-i) to close its
burrow. This individual finished closing its nest in light rain, which had
caused surface sand to form a crust. The wasp excavated dry sand from
beneath the crust and used this to complete its closure to the surface, sand
alone being used to fill the nest (nest 17). In all other nests, except for the
organic material near the entrance, the entire closure consisted of warm
surface sand kicked into the burrow.
One individual, 7 mm below the burrow mouth, held a piece of marram grass
thizome and appeared to be about to ram sand with it (Fig. 4b). Close
inspection with a lens revealed that it was, rather, positioning the material.
The same female, in her next nest, chose a very thin, long, branching, Y-
shaped twig 28 mm long (Fig. 4e). This twig was placed with its central part
over the nest burrow, but its three ends were actually outside the nest burrow,
so that it could not possibly be used to tamp down sand (Fig. 2d). The wood,
moreover, was raised slightly above the sand inside the nest. The wasp ran
back, turned away from the nest and kicked sand over the forked twig until it
was buried, then tamped down sand with its head. It then ran out 93 mm from
the nest and kicked sand over the area from several directions as it disguised
the nest. Only one, seemingly token, piece of organic material was used in
connection with each of the 16 completed nests observed in January 2002.
These objects are listed in Table 1.
Table 1. Characteristics of organic material incorporated in nest closure.
Nest Object
Ovoid marram grass rhizome fragment, 9 x 9 mm
1
2 Marram grass rhizome fragment, 9 mm x 5 mm (Fig. 4d)
3 Forked twig, 28 mm long (Fig. 4e)
4 Rotten wood fragment, 16 mm x 1.8 mm (Fig. 4i)
5 Dead wood fragment, 13.5 mm x 6 mm (Fig. 4a)
6 Dried, diseased lupin leaf shoot, 14 mm long (Fig. 4g)
7 Dead, dry, hard, Agrotis innominata (?) early instar larva, 14 mm long
(Fig. 4f)
8 Marram grass rhizome fragment, resembling that in nest 1
9 Lupin leaf fragment, 14 mm long (Fig. 4c)
10 Lupin leaf fragment, 18 mm long (Fig. 4h)
11 Wood fragment, 17 mm x 8.2 mm (Fig. 4b)
12 Marram grass rhizome fragment, 9 mm x 6 mm
13-16 Marram grass rhizome fragment resembling that in nest 2
17 No organic material used; nest filled entirely with dry sand taken from
beneath hard, crusted sand after light rain had commenced
Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3) 131
Compacting of nest closure without a “tool”
In the burrow entrances, females were not observed to ram by holding a
pebble in the mandibles while vibrating the whole body with rapid and
audible movement of the flight muscles. It is concluded that, at least on
coastal beaches in the Bay of Plenty and at Castlecliff Beach in New Zealand,
this species does not use a “tool” to ram nest material. Instead, it drops a
piece of dry organic material on the sand of the nest closure about 7 mm from
the surface and then puts more sand on top of it.
Variability of nidification cycle
This species sometimes digs its nest before hunting for prey and, at other
times, digs its nest after finding prey. In the 2002 observations, no individual
was seen to take prey into a succession of burrows before finally ovipositing
on the prey, as was recorded by Harris (2001), indicating that this is a
variable aspect of nidification behaviour. There were, nevertheless, many
variations in the manner in which the paralysed larvae were taken to the nest,
including long detours and partial burial of the prey. The unpredictability of
which burrow is finally chosen as the nest, together with the placement of
organic material within the burrow, about 7 mm below its mouth, possibly
make it more difficult for potential predators to locate the immature wasp.
The caterpillar in the nest cell was often coiled on its side (sometimes very
loosely) in a *C”, with the head and anus both facing the entrance. In two
nests, the caterpillar was placed in the cell supine, uncurled and straight, with
the head facing the end (apex) of the cell and the anus facing the cell
entrance. The egg was placed on the 2nd abdominal segment on both of these
non-curled prey. Both nests were very shallow, one being 38.3 mm deep.
Competition
Three Tachysphex nigerrimus (Smith) (Larridae) females were observed to
drive P. t. suspiciosa females from nests. On 7 January 2002, a P. t.
suspiciosa female spent 38 minutes digging a burrow 63 mm deep, then
walked, orienting, around the nest area. As it was doing this, a 7. nigerrimus
female ran into the burrow and remained inside. The P. t. suspiciosa female
ran into its burrow, ran out, then in and out again twice, after which the T.
nigerrimus female flew out, rushed at the P. t. suspiciosa and drove it away,
then re-entered the usurped burrow. The P. t. suspiciosa returned, faced away
from the burrow and started digging sand into the burrow and ramming it with
its head. The T. nigerrimus ran out through the sand, flew at the P. t.
suspiciosa, then began removing sand that the latter had kicked into the
burrow. The T. nigerrimus female then extended the burrow into firm, slightly
damp sand while the P. t. suspiciosa began digging a new burrow 14 cm away
from its usurped burrow. After 26 seconds, the P. t. suspiciosa abandoned her
second burrow and ran into the Acacia longifolia var. sophorae scrub. Two
further 7. nigerrimus females drove P. t. suspiciosa females from their
burrows but did not nest in the usurped burrows (field notebook 57).
132 Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3)
Discussion
Observations made during this and earlier studies are summarised in Table 2.
Evan’s (1964) assertion that ‘all Sphecinae pack the nest closure with blows
of the head, while other Sphecidae use the pygidium for this purpose,’ is true
for P. t. suspiciosa. The behaviour seen repeatedly in January 2002 somewhat
resembled McCarthy’s (1917) brief account of its nidification in Australia,
except that New Zealand individuals never used increasingly larger soil
particles as they approached the surface, only sand being used, apart from the
single item of organic material used about 7 mm from the surface. In all my
studies of 1992, 2001 and 2002, no individual rammed sand by holding a
small chip in her mandibles ‘like a tool’, as was described for P. t. suspiciosa
in Australia by Chandler (1926), Bristowe (1971) and Rayment (1935). When
nesting in soil other than marine sand, females may well tamp soil with a chip,
but this has not been observed in New Zealand.
Table 2. Summary of observations.
Observations
Prey carriage normally resembles that described by Harris (1994).
Prey is sometimes crushed or lapped around the mouth or oesophagus with the
wasp’s mandibles and other mouthparts, possibly crushing the host’s oesophageal
ganglia and imbibing the host’s fluids (2 observations).
Prey is caught either before or after construction of the nest.
The prey may be placed in the burrow on its side, curved into a “C”, with both head
and anus facing the entrance, or (rarely) it may be positioned supine, extended
straight, non-curled, with its head facing the end wall (apex) of the cell and with its
anus facing the entrance or projecting up the burrow.
The wasp’s egg is positioned laterally on the prey, between the Ist and 4th abdominal
segment, usually on the 2nd, 3rd or 4th.
Nests are always single-celled.
There are several, very closely-grouped burrows, usually 2-7.
Prey on occasion may seemingly be placed in any one of the 2-7 grouped burrows
and, at times, in a nest dug elsewhere.
The entire nest, including both burrow and cell, is completely surrounded by dry,
loose sand.
Burrows are filled by sand, kicked by the fore legs below the wasp, facing away from
the nest and compacted by ramming with the front of the wasp’s head, the wasp
alternating between digging and compacting every 3-8 seconds.
During burrow closure, the wasp exits the burrow backwards, pygidium first. Many
other solitary wasps, including Pompilidae, exit the burrow head first.
A piece of dry organic matter, varying from a tiny scrap of rotten wood to a twig, a
dried leaf, a sprig of dried leaves and a hard, dried, lepidopterous caterpillar, is
usually placed in the sand fill of the burrow about 7 mm below the mouth, then more
sand is placed on top until the surface is attained, when the nest is disguised.
The nest closure is not tamped down by an object held in the mandibles.
Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3) 133
O’Brien (1983) stated that Podalonia argentifrons (Cresson), in Arizona,
placed a noctuid larva in its burrow not rolled into a “C” shape, but extended
out straight, lying on its right side. An egg was placed laterally on the left side
between the third thoracic and the first abdominal segments. O’Brien (1983)
stated that the non-curled position of the prey might be species-specific to P.
argentifrons, because ‘so far as is known, all cutworms stored by Podalonia
Fernald species are curled in a “C” shape.’ However, my observations of
March 1992 and January 2002 indicate that P. t. suspiciosa occasionally also
places prey in the burrow in an extended, non-curved position, often when it
has an exceptionally large prey item, at which times the prey may extend out
of the cell and into the burrow.
Evans (1987) stated that Podalonia occidentalis Murray was ‘unusually
variable’ in many aspects of its behaviour. Thus nests and prey were both
sometimes aborted, some nests were filled with quarries and others lacked
quarries (a quarry being an auxiliary burrow dug near the nest for the purpose
of obtaining spoil to close the nest burrow). Egg position also varied
considerably. The most striking variation in P. occidentalis was in the nest-
prey dichotomy, this behavioural difference often being considered a
fundamental one (Evans 1987). Most reported accounts of Podalonia species
(and many other more generalised wasps) take prey before they make a nest.
In contrast, more derived or specialised wasps (e.g. Ammophila W. Kirby)
take prey only after they have made a nest (Evans and West-Eberhard 1970,
O’Neil 2001, Iwata 1942, 1976).
Evans (1987) stated that an unusual amount of variation in nesting behaviour
has been reported in at least two other species of Podalonia. He stated that P.
valida (Cresson) is distinctive in that females make a series of nests in a
restricted territory that is defended against intrusion by other females and
there was evidence that P. occidentalis females return again and again to the
same general area to nest, without exhibiting territorial behaviour. In my 2002
observations, P. t. suspiciosa behaved on occasions like P. occidentalis and
P. valida, returning to the same general area to nest (always without territorial
behaviour). It usually made a series of tightly grouped false burrows.
In 2002, P. t. suspiciosa females were thrice observed to be driven from
burrows they had dug by the smaller Tachysphex nigerrimus females, which
then usurped the burrows, either modifying them for their own use or
subsequently abandoning them. P. t. suspiciosa females at Castlecliff Beach
were not limited by scarce nesting space. It is possible that P. t. suspiciosa
females would compete inter-specifically for nesting territory if they were
restricted, in the same way that females of the pompilid wasp Priocnemis
(Trichocurgus) conformis Smith fight ferociously for nesting space on Leith
Saddle, Dunedin, where nesting space is limited. In my experience, this
occurs nowhere else, at least not to the same extent (Harris 1999).
134 Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3)
Evans (1987) stated that Podalonia appears to be a genus in transition, with
respect to whether the prey is taken before nest building or after the nest is
built. Similarly, O’Neill (2001) stated that it is uncertain whether Podalonia
species represent primitive forms in the evolution of sphecid nesting
behaviour, or whether they have secondarily reverted to a primitive form of
nesting (a change in the nesting hierarchy from stage 4a, nest-prey-egg-
closure, to stage 3, prey-nest-egg-closure). Nesting cycles are represented by
formulae, arranged in an hierarchy that may represent an evolutionary
sequence of behaviour (e.g. Harris 1987, 1994, 1999). The second of
O’Neil’s (2001) alternatives appears to best fit the behaviour of P. t.
suspiciosa in New Zealand. O’Neil (2001) further suggested that Podalonia
species may change from stage 3 to stage 4a, depending on prey availability,
but this certainly did not apply at Castlecliff Beach where the prey, Agrotis
innominata final instar larvae, were at all times abundant in the study area.
Acknowledgements )
I am very grateful to Mrs E.C. Harris for assistance with all aspects of this work and
Mr A.W. Don and Ms A. Jul for commenting on an earlier draft of the manuscript.
References
BOHART, R.M. and MENKE, A.S. 1976. Sphecid wasps of the world: a generic revision.
University of California Press, Berkeley; 695 pp.
BRISTOWE, W.S. 1971. The habits ofa West Australian sphecid wasp. Entomologist 104: 42-
44.
CHANDLER, L.G. 1926. Habits of the sand-wasp. Victorian Naturalist 42: 107-114.
EVANS, H.E. 1964. The classification and evolution of digger wasps as suggested by larval
characters (Hymenoptera: Sphecoidea). Entomological News 9(75): 225-237.
EVANS, H.E. 1987. Observations on the prey and nests of Podalonia occidentalis Murray
(Hymenoptera: Sphecidae). Pan-Pacific Entomologist 63(2): 130-134.
EVANS, H.E. and WEST-EBERHARD, M.J. 1970. The wasps. University of Michigan Press,
Ann Arbor; 265 pp.
HARRIS, A.C. 1987. Pompilidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera). Fauna of New Zealand 12.
Department of Scientific & Industrial Research, Wellington; 154 pp.
HARRIS, A.C. 1994. Sphecidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera). Fauna of New Zealand 32. Landcare
Research, Lincoln; 111 pp.
HARRIS, A.C. 1999. The life histories and nesting behaviour of the Pompilidae (Hymenoptera)
in New Zealand: a comparative study. Species Diversity 4(1): 143-235.
HARRIS, A.C. 2001. Nesting behaviour of Podalonia tydei suspiciosa (Smith) (Hymenoptera:
Apoidea: Sphecidae: Sphecinae) at Castlecliff Beach, Wanganui, with a description of the
mature larva. New Zealand Entomologist 24: 57-62.
IWATA, K. 1942. Comparative studies on the habits of solitary wasps. Tenthredo 4: 1-146.
IWATA, K. 1976. Evolution of instinct: comparative ethology of Hymenoptera. Amerind
Publishing Co., New Delhi; 535 pp. (Translation of 1971 Japanese edition).
McCARTHY, T. 1917. Some observations on solitary wasps at Hay, N.S.W. Australian
Naturalist 3(15): 195-200.
O'BRIEN, M.F. 1983. Observations on the nesting of Podalonia argentifrons. The Southwest
Entomologist 8(3): 194-197.
O'NEILL, K.M. 2001. Solitary wasps, behaviour and natural history. Comstock Publishing
Associates, Cornell University Press, Ithaca; 406 pp.
RAYMENT, T. 1935. A cluster of bees. The Endeavour Press, Sydney; 750 pp.
Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3): 135-138 135
FIELD OBSERVATIONS ON THE LIFE HISTORY AND
BEHAVIOUR OF JALMENUS EVAGORAS EUBULUS MISKIN
(LEPIDOPTERA: LYCAENIDAE) IN THE SOUTHERN BRIGALOW
BELT OF QUEENSLAND
M.J. BREITFUSS! and C.J. HILL?
Queensland Institute of Medical Research, 300 Herston Rd., Herston, Old 4029
Environmental Protection Agency, PO Box 731, Hume Street, Toowoomba, Qld 4350
Abstract
Observations on the life history and behaviour of Jalmenus evagoras eubulus Miskin are
described from an undisturbed forest in the southern brigalow belt of Queensland, supporting the
larval host plant Acacia harpophylla F. Muell. ex Benth. (brigalow).
Introduction
The butterfly Jalmenus evagoras eubulus Miskin is one of two recognised
subspecies of J. evagoras (Donovan) (Braby 2000). Unlike J. e. evagoras,
which is distributed along the eastern coast and inland from Melbourne to just
north of Gladstone (Common and Waterhouse 1981), J. e. eubulus inhabits
brigalow-dominated forests and woodlands from central and southern inland
Queensland to far northern New South Wales (Common and Waterhouse
1981). Under Queensland legislation, J. e. eubulus is considered vulnerable
(State of Queensland 1994).
The main aims of this study were to verify the morphology of immature J. e.
eubulus and to provide in situ descriptions of its breeding behaviour,
myrmecophilous interactions and larval host preference.
Study site
Field observations were made on a previously unrecorded population of J. e.
eubulus in a remnant patch of old growth brigalow on the eastern Darling
Downs, SE Qld. All observations were made during the peak reproductive
period from January to March 1999. The site is located approximately 130
km west of Toowoomba (AMG 304450E 6981000N) and exhibits a
characteristic melonhole microtopography on an alluvial substrate.
Acacia harpophylla (brigalow) dominated both the tree and shrub canopies
and was infrequently associated with Eucalyptus populnea (poplar box),
Santalum lanceolatum (sandalwood) and Casuarina cristata (belah). Small
shrub and herb layers comprised sparse covers of Prostanthera sp. (native
mint), Enchylaena tomentosa (ruby saltbush), Sclerolaena tetracuspis
(brigalow bur), Commelina sp. and Portulaca sp. Grass cover was dominated
by Panicum decompositum (native millet).
Description of immature and adult stages
Egg. Similar to those of J. evagoras as described by Common and
Waterhouse (1981) and Braby (2000). Eggs are bluish-white in colour, with a
course pattern of ridges and short spines on the outer surface, radiating from a
136 Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3)
darkened micropylar depression. Clusters of 6-15 eggs and/or choria were
observed on the stem nodes, stem scars and stem axils of brigalow. No eggs
were noted on leaves. Despite lengthy searching, no egg clusters were
observed on other vegetation species within the study site.
First instar larva. Colour pink to pale orange dorsally; few pale hairs on
dorsal surface; head, prothoracic and anal plates dark brown.
Second to final instar larvae. Colour dark brown to black in mature
specimens; paired dark green, brown or black dorsal tubercules on
mesothorax, metathorax and abdomen, more conspicuous in mature forms;
often with light to shining green, yellow or red subspiracular band; pale, fine
marginal hairs; head black; white or cream median line on black prothoracic
plate; abdominal segments 7-9 somewhat flattened, gland on seventh
abdominal segment conspicuous green or green-yellow; anal plate with
minute pale hairs; posterior abdominal segments (7-10) often bordered by a
green or yellow subspiracular band; ventral surface pale; thoracic legs dark
brown to black, prolegs pale.
Pupa. Glossy dark brown to black; segments, veins, spiracles and often
appendages defined by conspicuous orange or light brown bands. Girdle
present.
Adult. All adult J. e. eubulus observed were similar to nominate J. e.
evagoras, except for subtle differences in their central wing colouration and
banding on the undersides of the wings. J. e. eubulus adults had very pale
whitish blue- or green-tinted wings with narrow black bands beneath. In
comparison, J. e. evagoras adults had metallic bluish-green colours on the
wings with broad black bands beneath.
Adult behaviour
Adult flight activity in J. e. eubulus increased from mid-morning and
remained constant throughout the afternoon until dusk, at which time it
reduced rapidly. Both males and females were observed in flight and at rest
on mature brigalow trees, shrubs and juvenile plants of heights between 0.5
and 17. m. Males were often seen resting in overhanging vegetation above
host plants. Adult emergence occurred in the early morning between 0900 and
1000 h and males were regularly observed in flight or at rest close to other
pupae.
Copulation in J. e. eubulus was observed on four occasions at the study site.
Prior to mating a single male or group of males circled a female (which was
stationary on the host plant) before landing next to her (within 5 cm). A
receptive female responded with wing fluttering and slow spins and then by
exposing her abdomen to the successful male.
Copulatory behaviour appeared similar to that in J. e. evagoras, with the male
extending its genitalia along the length of the female abdomen before
Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3) 137
engaging and assuming a tail-to-tail position. Pairs remained in-copula for up
to 35 minutes, although periods of over 3 h have been recorded for J. e.
evagoras (Pierce and Nash 1993), and were stationary on the host plant for
the duration. All mating observed was between 1030 and 1330 h, although
courtship behaviour was noted before and after these times.
Some females were mated directly after eclosion and often before the wings
had fully expanded and dried. An extreme case was noted where a female was
mated even before releasing the meconium. Upon discharge of the liquid,
males flying in the vicinity became very active and attempted to engage the
female who, in response, held her abdomen in a slightly upright position. The
group of males dispersed soon after and no further mating in the described
female was noted.
At 1500 h on the same day, a female with a noticeably swollen abdomen
landed on a host plant and appeared to actively search sections of leaves and
stems using extended tarsi. This behaviour continued for approximately three
minutes before she began laying eggs in a stem axil.
The oviposition site was 30 cm above ground on a juvenile brigalow 1.2 m
high. Three similar oviposition locations (two stem nodes and a stem scar
each at 0.3 to 0.5 m above ground) were selected on the same plant by the
female described above. Host plants selected for oviposition had the attendant
ant present, or remnants of the previous season’s exuviae. This has also been
noted for J. e. evagoras (Pierce & Nash 1999).
Males were regularly involved in territorial disputes with other J. e. eubulus
males as well as different butterfly species (including Papilio aegeus
Donovan and Belenois java L.), birds and humans. As with J. e. evagoras,
this behaviour was often followed by the defending male returning to a rest
position above the host plants which contained immatures. The activity also
appeared to be damaging to the males, causing deterioration of the wings over a
period of time, similar to that reported for J. e. evagoras (Pierce and Nash
1999).
Larval behaviour
Larvae sheltered on the undersides of stems, leaf petioles and leaves at night
and in the early morning. During the day, early and late instar larvae fed on
mature leaves, growing leaf tips and fresh shoots of juvenile brigalow plants
up to 5.0 m in height. Feeding continued until dusk. Unlike J. e. evagoras,
which congregate into feeding clusters, J. e. eubulus were solitary when
feeding and clustered after dusk.
Larval feeding sites on the host plant included fresh growth at both ground
level (off the main stem) and on the apical meristems of crowns. Food plants
with larvae present were often conspicuously defoliated.
Pupation occurred solitarily on brigalow host leaves at heights up to 5.0 m.
138 Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3)
Both larvae and pupae were always attended by a small, fast-moving species
of Iridomyrmex ant (Common and Waterhouse 1981), most likely in the
anceps group (R. Eastwood, pers. comm.) which attends J. e. evagoras
(Pierce and Nash 1999). The relationship between the ant and the immature
stages of J. e. evagoras is mutualistic (Pierce et al. 1987, Pierce and Nash
1999) and may be similar for J. e. eubulus.
Acknowledgements l
The authors thank J. Kerr for sharing his knowledge of this species and its
habits and H. Proctor for comments on the manuscript.
References
BRABY, M.F. 2000. Butterflies of Australia: their identification, biology and distribution. 2
vols. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne; xx + 976 pp.
COMMON, LF.B. and WATERHOUSE, D.F. 1981. Butterflies of Australia. Revised Edition.
Angus and Robertson, Sydney; xiv + 682 pp.
PIERCE, N. and NASH, D. 1999. The Imperial Blue, Jalmenus evagoras (Lycaenidae). Pp 279-
315, in Kitching, R., Scheermeyer, E., Jones, R. and Pierce, N. (eds.), Biology of Australian
butterflies. Monographs on Australian Lepidoptera, Volume 6. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne;
395 pp.
PIERCE, N., KITCHING, R., BUCKLEY, R., TAYLOR, M. and BENBOW, K. 1987. The costs
and benefits of cooperation between the Australian lycaenid butterfly, Jalmenus evagoras, and
its attendant ants. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 21: 237-248.
STATE OF QUEENSLAND. 1994. Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 1994. SL No.
474. Reprint number 1, Government Printer; 106 pp.
Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3): 139-140 139
THE LIFE HISTORY OF TOXIDIA INORNATA INORNATA
(BUTLER) (LEPIDOPTERA: HESPERIIDAE: TRAPEZITINAE)
G.A. WOOD! and C.J. MULLER?
!PO Box 122, Atherton, Old 4883
2PO Box 3228, Dural. NSW 2158
Abstract
The early stages of Toxidia inornata inornata (Butler) are described. The larval food plant at
Iron Range is an unidentified species of wire grass, Tetrarrhena sp. (Poaceae).
Introduction
Toxidia inornata inornata (Butler) occurs in the Kai and Aru Is of Indonesia
and in northern Queensland, Australia (Braby 2000). Known Queensland
localities are all in Cape York Peninsula: Jardine River basin (Moulds and
D’Apice 1982), Captain Billy Creek (Monteith and Hancock 1977), Iron
Range (Kerr 1966) and McIlwraith Range near Coen (Eastwood 1995).
At Iron Range, a female was observed depositing a single egg on the leaf ofa
climber (Matchbox Bean, Entada phaseoloides: Fabaceae). This vine was
trailing through grass beside a track in rainforest. The egg and piece of vine
were collected but, as this seemed an unlikely larval food plant, samples of
the grasses growing in the immediate vicinity were also collected. On
hatching, the larva left the vine and fed on a wire grass. Females subsequently
collected and sleeved with this grass oviposited readily.
Life history
Larval food plant. Wire grass, Tetrarrhena sp. (Poaceae).
Egg. Diameter 0.5 mm. Green; dome-shaped, with barely discernible vertical
ribs.
First instar larva. Length 3 mm. Head shiny black; round and smooth. Body
green; smooth and finely haired.
Final instar larva (Fig. 1). Length 21 mm. Head shiny black with two pale
white lateral markings; rounded with very shallow dorsal groove; smooth but
finely pitted. Body smooth; translucent green with a reddish tinge that is
palest at the centre and darker towards the ends, with prominent whitish
dorsal and dorsolateral lines and an indistinct lateral line.
Pupa (Fig. 2). Length 14 mm. Uniformly pale brown; smooth and shiny
except wing cases covered with short setae; sculpturing unremarkable; frons
rounded; thoracic spiracles black. Attached by cremaster to silken pad.
Discussion
Eggs are laid singly either on the food plant or on nearby material. In
captivity, early instar larvae rested on the upper leaf surface of the food plant,
rarely producing shelters. When shelters were constructed they were very
140 Australian Entomologist, 2003, 30 (3)
rudimentary, consisting of fine silken threads partially folding in the leaf
margins. Later instars shelter in debris at the base of the food plant. They
were not observed to produce shelters but utilised naturally occurring rounded
leaves or bark in which to rest or pupate. In Figure 2, a section of the bark has
been removed to expose the pupa.
Toxidia inornata inornata is a rainforest species that usually flies close to the
ground. It occurs throughout the year but is most common after the wet
season when wire grass is at maximum growth. Eggs laid in mid September
produced adults in mid January. Pupal duration was 12 days.
Figs 1-2. Toxidia inornata inornata. (1) final instar larva; (2) pupa.
` Acknowledgement y
We are grateful to the Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service for the permit
covering this work.
References
BRABY, M.F. 2000. Butterflies of Australia: their identification, biology and distribution. 2
vols. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne; xx + 976 pp.
EASTWOOD, R.G. 1995. New distribution records of Hesperiidae and Lycaenidae. Australian
Entomologist 22: 75-76.
KERR, J.F.R. 1966. New records of Lepidoptera in Australia. Journal of the Entomological
Society of Queensland 5: 72-73.
MONTEITH, G.B. and HANCOCK, D.L. 1977. Range extensions and notable records for
butterflies of Cape York Peninsula, Australia. Australian Entomological Magazine 4: 21-38.
MOULDS, M.S. and D’APICE, J.W.C. 1982. Butterflies of the upper Jardine River, Cape York
Peninsula. Australian Entomological Magazine 9: 21-26.
ENTOMOLOGICAL NOTICES
Items for insertion should be sent to the editor who reserves the right to alter, reject
or charge for notices.
WANTED. Specific butterfly collection data for inclusion in a planned
systematic list of the butterflies of Micronesia, Melanesia and Polynesia plus the
Bismarck Archipelago. Even common butterflies with reliable island data are
valuable. John Tennent, 38 Colin McLean Road, Dereham, Norfolk NR19 2RY,
England (e-mail jt@storment.freeserve.co.uk).
NOTES FOR AUTHORS
Manuscripts submitted for publication should, preferably, be type-written, double
spaced and in triplicate. Refer to recent issues for layout and style.
All papers will be forwarded to two referees and the editor reserves the right to reject
any paper considered unsuitable.
Papers longer than ten printed pages will normally not be accepted.
Papers will be accepted only if a minimum of 100 reprints is purchased. Manuscripts
occupying less than one printed page may be accepted without charge if no reprints
are required. Charges are as follows: cost per printed page $27.50 (B&W), $60
(colour) for 100 copies. Page charges may be reduced at the discretion of the
Publications Committee.
Illustrations. Both colour and B&W photographs must be submitted at the size they
are to appear in the journal. Line drawings should be about twice their required size.
Address manuscripts to: The Editor
The Australian Entomologist
P.O. Box 537,
Indooroopilly, Qld, 4068
Australia
Printed by ColourWise Reproductions, 300 Ann Street, Brisbane, 4000.
THE AUSTRALIAN
Entomologist
Volume 30, Part 3, 30 September 2003
kaŭ
CONTENTS
BREITFUSS, M.J. AND HILL, CJ.
Field observations on the life history and behaviour of Jalmenus evagoras eubulus
Miskin (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in the southern brigalow belt of Queensland.
HANCOCK, D.L. AND DREW, R.A.I.
New species and records of Trypetinae (Diptera: Tephritidae) from Australia and
the South Pacific.
HARRIS, A.C.
Clarification of the nesting behaviour of Podalonia tydei suspiciosa (Smith)
(Hymenoptera: Sphecidae) based on further observations at
Castlecliff Beach, New Zealand.
LACHLAN, R.B. AND MOULDS, M.S.
A second new species of Gnatbotblibus Wallengren (Lepidoptera:
Sphingidae) from Vanuatu.
POPPLE, L.W.
A new species of Cicadetta Amyot (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) from Queensland,
with notes on its calling song.
WOOD, G.A. AND MULLER, CJ.
The life history of Toxidia inornata inornata (Butler) (Lepidoptera:
Hesperiidae: Trapezitinae)
ISSN 1320 6133