THE AUSTRALIAN
Entomologist
published by
THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF QUEENSLAND
Volume 36, Part 1, 7 March 2009
Price: $6.00 per part
ISSN 1320 6133
THE AUSTRALIAN ENTOMOLOGIST
ABN#: 15 875 103 670
The Australian Entomologist is a non-profit journal published in four parts annually
by the Entomological Society of Queensland and is devoted to entomology of the
Australian Region, including New Zealand, Papua New Guinea and islands of the
south-western Pacific. Articles are accepted from amateur and professional
entomologists. The journal is produced independently and subscription to the journal
is not included with membership of the society.
The Publications Committee
Editor: Dr D.L. Hancock Editorial Co-ordinator
Assistant Editors: Dr C.J. Burwell Mrs S.G. Wright
Queensland Museum Business Manager
Dr F. Turco Dr G.B. Monteith
Queensland Museum (geoff.monteith @ bigpond.com)
Subscriptions
Subscription are payable in advance to the Business Manager, The Australian
Entomologist, P.O. Box 537, Indooroopilly, Qld, Australia, 4068.
For individuals: A$25.00 per annum in Australia.
A$30.00 per annum in Asia-Pacific Region.
-A$35.00 per annum elsewhere.
For institutions A$30.00 per annum in Australia.
A$40.00 per annum in Asia-Pacific Region.
A$40.00 per annum elsewhere.
Please forward all overseas cheques/bank drafts in Australian currency.
GST is not payable on our publication.
ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF QUEENSLAND
Membership is open to anyone interested in Entomology. Meetings are normally held
in the Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Queensland on the
second Monday of March-June and August-December each year. Meetings are
announced in the Society's News Bulletin which also contains reports of meetings,
entomological notes, notices of other Society events and information on Members’
activities.
Enquiries relating to the Society should be directed to the Honorary Secretary,
Entomological Society of Queensland, P.O. Box 537, Indooroopilly, Qld, Australia,
4068.
Cover: A male Narrow-banded Awl, Hasora khoda (Hesperiidae: Coeliadinae).
Occuring from New South Wales to central Queensland, this species flies at all times
of the day, but usually at dusk and early morning. The larvae feed on Wisteria and
Callerya (formerly Millettia). Awls are distributed from Africa and Madagascar to SE
Asia and Australia. Many species are migratory. Their origin is obscure but their close
relatives are the legume-feeding ‘tailed skippers’ (Eudaminae) of South America.
They are a basal group of butterflies probably linked to Gondwana. Illustration by
Andrew Atkins.
Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1): 1-2 1
NOTES ON THE BIOLOGY OF MERIMNA ATRATA (GORY &
LAPORTE) (COLEOPTERA: BUPRESTIDAE)
D.R. KITCHIN
2/19 Johnson Road, Gracemere, Qld 4702
Abstract
Notes are presented on the biology of Merimna atrata (Gory & Laporte). The larval food plant
for a reared specimen in eastern Queensland was fire-killed Baeckea frutescens L. (Myrtaceae).
Introduction
Merimna atrata (Gory & Laporte) is the only species within the buprestid
genus Merimna Saunders and is distributed throughout Australia (Bellamy
2002). It is unique within the family in being nocturnal but occasional
specimens feed at blossom during the day. It is known for its habit of flying
to lights and into fires, apparently attracted by heat. Hawkeswood and
Peterson (1982) recorded it ovipositing into smouldering bark at the base of a
eucalypt, Eucalyptus (Corymbia) calophylla R.Br. ex Lindl. (Myrtaceae) in
Perth, WA, but this species’ status as a food plant has not been confirmed
(Hawkeswood 2007). Recent work has shown that M. atrata locates fires by
infrared-sensitive sense organs on its abdomen (Schmitz et al. 2000).
The first observation of fire attraction in M. atrata was by H.M. Giles in
Perth, as reported by Poulton (1916), who stated that ‘its life history is
unknown, but I think it is likely that the larvae feed in the roots of the burnt
shrubs’. Recently, three final instar larvae were collected by the author 18 km
north of Yeppoon in central Queensland, with one being reared to adult.
Observations
On 18 September 2005, during a search for buprestid larvae in a small area of
regrowth heath clean burnt during December 2003, several fire-killed stumps
of Baeckea frutescens L. (Myrtaceae) were knocked out of the dry sand with
the back of a tomahawk and dissected. The stumps were made up of
numerous, very tightly interlocked segments, each of which supported a
slender stem prior to being burnt. Considerable force had to be applied to
split the segments apart. Termites had removed all bark and soft tissue from
the outer surface and the remaining wood was very dry and extremely hard.
No larvae or evidence of larval activity were found within the stumps/roots
during dissection but three separate larvae were found in loose sand after the
stumps were unearthed. The large size, 35-40 mm, precluded a Castiarina
species and another buprestid, Temognatha obesissima (Thomson), which
occurs commonly in the area, was considered a possibility. One larva had
been damaged and was discarded. Although buprestid larvae are difficult to
rear once exposed, the two remaining larvae appeared mature and were
placed on damp padded tissue, in small clear plastic boxes, in order to permit
observation without disruption. The boxes were then shelved in darkness.
2 Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1)
On 25 October 2005, a parasitic larva approximately 12 mm long was seen
attached to the side of one of the buprestid larvae. The parasite was detached
in an attempt to save the buprestid larva and boxed separately. Both larvae
remained alive for some time but failed to pupate.
The remaining larva pupated on 29 October 2005 and an adult Merimna
atrata emerged during the night of 13 November 2005. It had become
apparent that it was not T. obesissima as expected when the white pupa
darkened to black prior to emergence. Like the pupa, the adult lay on its
dorsal surface and moved its legs for several days before turning right way
up. It is retained in the author’s collection.
Discussion
Buprestidae are considered to breed within the stems, roots or leaves of living
or dead plants. Many small species are leaf miners. The larvae recorded here
were unearthed in loose sand, with none found by dissecting the stumps, but
it is not known whether they were free-living or were simply dislodged
during the collection process. In December 2004, twelve months after the fire
and following a heavy storm on the previous afternoon, M. atrata adults were
common on the stems of low, green regrowth within the burnt area. If
oviposition in this species only occurs in direct response to fire, as recorded
by Hawkeswood and Peterson (1982), the adults observed might have been
newly emerged after a life cycle of only one year with some, e.g. the three
larvae collected, taking two or more years to complete development.
The wide distribution of M. atrata suggests that it uses a range of fire-killed
timber other than Baeckea frutescens, which has a restricted habitat.
Acknowledgement
I thank Dr Rhonda Melzer (Environmental Protection Agency [EPA],
Rockhampton) for assistance with plant identification.
References
BELLAMY, C.L. 2002. Coleoptera: Buprestoidea. In: Houston, W.W.K. (ed.), Zoological
catalogue of Australia. Volume 29.5. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne; xii + 492 pp, 4 pls.
HAWKESWOOD, T.J. 2007. Review of the biology of the genus Merimna Saunders, 1868
(Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Calodema 9: 12-13.
HAWKESWOOD, T.J. and PETERSON, M. 1982. A review of larval hosts records for
Australian jewel beetles (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Victorian Naturalist 99: 240-251.
POULTON, E.B. 1916. The habits of the Australian buprestid “fire beetle”, Merimna atrata Lap.
et Gory. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of London 1915(1): iii-iv.
SCHMITZ, H., SCHMITZ, A. and BLECKMAN, H. 2000. A new type of infrared organ in the
Australian “fire-beetle”, Merimna atrata (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Naturwissenschaften 12:
542-545.
Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1): 3-5 3
A NEW GEOGRAPHICAL RECORD FOR ANISYNTA CYNONE
(HEWITSON) (LEPIDOPTERA: HESPERIIDAE: TRAPEZITINAE)
MICHAEL C. SANDS
40 Fleming Road, Chapel Hill, Old 4069
Abstract
Torrington, on the Dutchman’s Tableland in the extreme north of the New England region of
New South Wales, is recorded as a new locality for Anisynta cynone (Hewitson). Specimens
from this locality are discussed and illustrated.
Introduction
Anisynta cynone (Hewitson) is an endemic Australian skipper known from
the Yorke Peninsula in South Australia to the lower Murray Valley in
Victoria and Deniliquin in southwestern New South Wales, and from
Gunnedah, Somerton, Mt Kaputar and Bolivia Hill in northeastern New
South Wales (Braby 2000). Braby (2000) recognised only two named
subspecies, the southern A. c. cynone and the northern A. c. gunneda L.E.
Couchman. The latter subspecies is known with certainty only from
Gunnedah and Somerton (Braby 2000), with specimens from Mt Kaputar
(included by Common and Waterhouse 1981) considered to be distinct
(Braby 2000, Sands and New 2002).
Braby (2000) also excluded the population at Bolivia Hill (36 km south of
Tenterfield in the New England region of NSW) from A. c. gunneda. It
appears to share characteristics with Anisynta tillyardi Waterhouse & Lyell
(Braby 2000, D.P.A. Sands, J.F.R. Kerr and E.D. Edwards pers. comms) and
might be part of a natural hybrid zone (Sands and New 2002).
Observations and discussion
During a field trip to Bolivia Hill in early April 2005, a single male
resembling A. cynone was observed near the summit of that location. In April
2006, an unidentified species of Hesperiidae was observed near a drainage
point adjacent to pastoral land on the nearby Dutchaman’s Tableland, which
lies about 20 km to the west of Bolivia Hill. Three specimens (two males and
one female), in poor condition, were collected at this location (Silent Grove
Road, 1128 m, 4.0 km north of Torrington, 29°16’54”S, 151°41’08”E) in
April 2007.
On 12 and 14 March 2008, two further visits were made to the Dutchman’s
Tableland locality. On both days weather conditions were ideal. A large
number of A. cynone adults were observed and 26 collected (Figs 1-4).
The habitat of A. cynone at this locality is a section of unsealed road that
passes through pastoral land. While the Dutchman’s Tableland is well
protected and under National Parks’ control, this particular area is an
exception. Surveying in the adjacent and pristine Torrington Conservation
Park did not yield any observations or records of this skipper.
4 Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1)
On occasions, some Anisynta Lower species may be abundant in arcas that
have been disturbed, although availability of snow-grass (Poa spp.) is a
prerequisite. This newly reported occurrence is typical of a disturbed habitat.
Adults appeared to originate from undulating, cleared grazing land on the
high side of an unsealed road and flew along the roadside before settling on
yellow flowers. Some forest is present on the lower side of the road.
This locality is significant due to the strength and abundance of the colony as
well as its close proximity to the Queensland border, 22 km directly to the
northwest. Here the species is well established and secure. A meeting with a
landholder suggested there would not be changes to farming practices in the
area in the foreseable future.
The collected specimens show some variation in size and colouration.
Average wingspan is 26 mm (n = 16) for males and 27 mm (n = 10) for
females, close to those of A. tillyardi. The wing pattern is similar to that of
specimens of A. cynone from the Mt Kaputar and Gunnedah localities (E.D.
Edwards pers. comm.). As with the Mt Kaputar and Bolivia Hill populations,
the subspecific status of these Dutchman’s Tableland specimens is not certain
and further taxonomic studies may be needed.
4
Figs 1-4. Anisynta cynone from the Dutchnam’s Tableland, NSW. (1-2) male upper
and undersides; (3-4) female upper and undersides. (Scale bar = 10 mm).
Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1) z
Acknowledgements
All surveys in this area were conducted on NSW National Parks Scientific
Licence number S 11996. Dr D.P.A. Sands examined the collected
specimens. Mr E.D. Edwards (Australian National Insect Collection,
Canberra) examined images and specimens and provided detailed comparison
with the same species from other locations. The owner- of ‘Tungsten’
provided insights on the settlement and history of Torrington and the
Dutchman’s Tableland. Geoff Thompson (Queensland Museum) skilfully
prepared the figures.
References
BRABY, M.F. 2000. Butterflies of Australia: their identification, biology and distribution.
CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood; xx + 976 pp.
COMMON, LF.B. and WATERHOUSE, D.F. 1981. Butterflies of Australia. Revised edition.
Angus and Robertson, Sydney; xiv + 682 pp.
SANDS, D.P.A. and NEW, T.R. 2002. The action plan for Australian butterflies. Environment
Australia, Canberra; 385 pp.
6 Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1)
RANGE EXTENSIONS FOR TWO SPECIES OF LYCAENIDAE
(LEPIDOPTERA) TO COFFS HARBOUR, NEW SOUTH WALES
T.J. SHAKESPEARE, Z.J. SHAKESPEARE and T.P. SHAKESPEARE
158b Gaudrons Road, Sapphire Beach, NSW 2450
(Email: ThomasShakespeare@gmail.com)
Abstract
Records of southern extensions of range are provided for Hypochrysops digglesii (Hewitson) and
Nacaduba kurava parma Waterhouse & Lyell, collected in Coffs Harbour, New South Wales.
Introduction
During December 2007 and January 2008, two lycaenid butterfly species
were captured at Sapphire Beach, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales. Both
were represented by single specimens taken in a garden bordering the Orara
East State Forest, at an altitude of 100 m and 2 km west ofthe coastline. Both
were collected significantly further south than their previously reported
southern limit.
New records
LYCAENIDAE
Hypochrysops digglesii (Hewitson)
One male, in freshly emerged condition, was collected on 26.x1i1.2007 at
0900h. This specimen was inconspicuous, rapidly circling and feeding from
flowers of a large Hibiscus sp. at a height of 2 metres, in full sun. This record
extends the known range of this species approximately 80 km further south
than the previously reported locality of Grafton (Common and Waterhouse
1981, Braby 2000, 2004).
Nacaduba kurava parma Waterhouse & Lyell
One female, in freshly emerged condition, was collected on 27.1.2008 at
1500h. This specimen was observed resting 50 cm above the ground in the
afternoon sun, with its wings outstretched, on a small Murraya paniculata.
This record extends the known range of this species approximately 80 km
further south than the previously reported locality of Grafton (Common and
Waterhouse 1981, Braby 2000, 2004).
References
BRABY, M.F. 2000. Butterflies of Australia: their identification, biology and distribution.
CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood; xx + 976 pp.
BRABY, M.F. 2004. The complete field guide to butterflies of Australia. CSIRO Publishing,
Collingwood; xx + 340 pp.
COMMON, I.F.B. and WATERHOUSE, D.F. 1981. Butterflies of Australia. Revised edition.
Angus and Robertson, Sydney; xiv + 682 pp.
Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1): 7-12 7
RELATIONSHIPS OF THE SWALLOWTAIL ‘GENERA’ AGEHANA
MATSUMURA, CHILASA MOORE AND ELEPPONE HANCOCK
(LEPIDOPTERA: PAPILIONIDAE)
DAVID L. HANCOCK
PO Box 2464, Cairns, Old 4870
Abstract
Three Old World groups of Papilionini with apparent New World ancestors are reviewed. The
Chinese Agehana Matsumura is transferred from a subgenus of Chilasa Moore to a subgenus of
Pterourus Scopoli. The Indo-Papuan Chilasa and Australian Eleppone Hancock are treated as
sister-genera derived from ancestral Heraclides Hiibner. Dispersal is suggested to be Beringian
in Pterourus (Agehana) and Gondwanan in Chilasa and Eleppone.
Introduction
Papilio Linnaeus sens. lat. is a worldwide genus of some 200+ species of
swallowtail butterflies. Hancock (1983) divided it into six genera (Prerourus
Scopoli, Heraclides Hiibner, Eleppone Hancock, Chilasa Moore, Princeps
Hiibner and Papilio) that are now [with the exception of Chilasa] generally
regarded as subgenera (e.g. Häuser er al. 2005). Smith and Vane-Wright
(2008) noted that a more detailed examination of individual species-groups
might provide data enabling their monophyly to be tested and a more robust
phylogenetic hypothesis to be produced.
Chilasa, Eleppone and Agehana Matsumura [placed by Hancock (1983) as a
subgenus of Chilasa], include 14 species of Old World swallowtails that are
apparently derived from New World ancestors (Hancock 1983). As such,
they represent a small terminal group or groups that might help determine the
status of their ancestral groups. Their relationships are reassessed below.
Wing shapes and patterns throughout these three groups have been so greatly
modified by mimicry that they are completely unreliable as indicators of
relationships. Hence, greater reliance must be placed on characters of the
early stages and male genitalia. For the purposes of this study, the generic
names recognised by Hancock (1983) are used below.
Agehana Matsumura
Agehana is an Oriental taxon of two closely related species: A. e/wesi (Leech)
from China and A. maraho (Shiraki & Sonan) from Taiwan. It was included
within Chilasa by Igarashi (1976), placed as a subgenus of it by Hancock
(1983) and regarded as a separate but closely related genus by Igarashi
(1984). He et al. (1992) also treated it as a full genus. Miller (1987) did not
include it in his study and it does not appear to have been a part of any
molecular investigation.
Adults have exceptionally broad tails (uniquely enclosing two veins) and
appear to be Batesian mimics of the distasteful troidine genus Atrophaneura
Reakirt (Papilionidae) and/or the day-flying moth genus Epicopeia
Westwood (Epicopeiidae) (Hancock 1983). Igarashi (1976) illustrated the
8 Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1)
male genitalia. The valva has a broad clasper [= harpe] with a serrate apical
lobe and a distinct apicoventral spine. Early stages were discussed and/or
illustrated by Igarashi (1984: maraho) and He et al. (1992: both species).
Mature larvae are smooth, largely green above and blackish-brown below,
with similarly dark markings on the prothorax, as a pair of metathoracic
‘double eye-spots’, as a narrow band along the posterior margin of the first
abdominal segment, as a pair of subdorsal anterior spots or patches on the
second abdominal segment and as a )(-shaped pair of dark abdominal
markings (viewed from above) which are separated dorsally but connect
laterally with the dark lateroventral band; the ‘eye-spots’ are not connected
by a dark band, there is a distinct series of blue abdominal spots below the
spiracles and the osmeterium is white. Pupae are brown and relatively narrow
but not stick-like; the head is truncate and the thoracic ‘horn’ is short and
oblique. Larval food plants are Liriodendron (Magnoliaceae) for A. e/wesi
and Sassafras (Lauraceae) for A. maraho (Igarashi 1984).
The mature larvae of both species (He er al. 1992) are remarkably similar to
those of Pterourus Scopoli (Tyler et al. 1994), retaining the )(-shaped
abdominal markings seen in subgenus Pyrrhosticta Butler (which often, but
not always, connect dorsally in the latter taxon) and having the isolated
metathoracic ‘eye-spots’ seen in subgenus Pterourus (which lacks the )(-
shaped abdominal markings). The shape of the abdominal markings, the dark
lateroventral band and (especially) the series of blue subspiracular abdominal
spots set the Agehana species apart from superficially similar larvae in the
large, Old World genus Princeps [including the primitive Pr. xuthus
(Linnaeus)] and are especially indicative of a close relationship with
Pterourus. In Princeps, the lateroventral band is largely white and blue spots
are absent. The eggs, pupae and larval food plants of Agehana are also
similar to those of Prerourus. The male genitalia, especially the valva and
clasper (Igarashi 1976), are very similar to those of subgenus Pterourus
(Miller 1987, Tyler et al. 1994), particularly Pr. esperanza (Beutelspacher)
(Beutelspacher 1975) from Mexico, which has Prerourus-like larvae (Tyler er
al. 1994) and appears to be the most primitive species in that subgenus.
Chilasa Moore
Chilasa is a largely SE Asian taxon extending as far eastwards as New
Guinea and the Solomon Islands. Eleven species are recognised: C. clytia
(Linnaeus), C. paradoxa (Zinken-Sommer), C. veiovis (Hewitson), C.
osmana (Jumalon), C. carolinensis (Jumalon), C. agestor (Gray), C. epycides
(Hewitson), C. s/ateri (Gray), C. laglaizei (Depuiset), C. toboroi (Ribbe) and
C. moerneri (Aurivillius). It was treated as a distinct genus by Igarashi (1976,
1984) and by Hancock (1983). The former also included the South American
Heraclides anchisiades (Esper) and its allies within Chilasa, while the latter
arrangement (i.e. excluding Heraclides) has been widely (but not universally)
adopted in recent years (e.g. by Häuser er al. 2005).
Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1) 9
Adults often have a pale-spotted frons, thorax and abdomen and appear to be
Batesian mimics of various danaines (Nymphalidae) or (in the Papuan
laglaizei group) the day-flying moth genus Alcides Hübner (Uraniidae). The
male genitalia are not uniform in shape. The clasper is either broad (e.g.
clytia, paradoxa, veiovis, agestor, epycides) or narrow (slateri, laglaizei
group); there is no apicoventral spine but a posteroventral spine is present in
C. paradoxa. The aedeagus is strongly curved. Early stages were discussed
and illustrated by Straatman (1975), Igarashi (1984) and Müller (2001) and
have been illustrated in various faunal works.
Eggs are laid singly or in batches and larvae are accordingly either solitary
(clytia, agestor) or gregarious (epycides, slateri, laglaizei, toboroi). Mature
larvae are variable in appearance but are generally dark with pale spots or
patches; the prothorax, mesothorax, metathorax and abdominal segments 1-9
are distinctly tuberculate (except in C. epycides). In the laglaizei group,
mature larvae are banded with large, white lateral spots and the tubercles are
reduced (absent on prothorax). Pupae are generally brown and stick-like,
resembling a broken twig; the thoracic ‘horn’ is rudimentary and parallel with
the body axis. In the /aglaizei group the pupa is yellow and robust with the
thoracic ‘horn’ vestigial. Known larval food plants are species of Litsea,
Cinnamomum and Persea (Lauraceae).
The dark, tuberculate mature larva and shape of the pupal thoracic ‘horn’ are
likely to be homologous with those seen in several Heraclides species,
although the pale larval markings are possibly independently derived.
Solitary and gregarious larvae occur in both Chilasa and Heraclides. Igarashi
(1976, 1984) also noted a close relationship between Chilasa and Heraclides
based on their early stages and male genitalia, specifically the broad clasper
although the similarities appear largely superficial and there are no apical or
medioventral spines present in Chilasa.
Eleppone Hancock
Eleppone was proposed for the sole Australian species Papilio anactus W.S.
Macleay (Hancock 1979, 1983). It is currently regarded as a subgenus of
Papilio (e.g. by Häuser et al. 2005), although Igarashi (1976, 1984) and
Hancock (1983) had regarded it as either a part of or the sister-genus of
Chilasa.
Adults have a pale-spotted frons, thorax and abdomen and, in both
appearance and behaviour (A.G. Orr, pers. comm.), appear to be effective
Batesian mimics of the distasteful troidine Cressida cressida (Fabricius). The
male genitalia were illustrated by Miller (1987); the clasper is broad with a
posteroventral spine and the aedeagus is strongly curved. Early stages were
illustrated by Fisher (1978).
Eggs are laid singly and are unusually small (A.G. Orr, pers. comm.). Mature
larvae are dark with pale spots and patches; the prothorax, mesothorax,
10 Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1)
metathorax and abdominal segments 1-9 are distinctly tuberculate. Pupae are
generally a variegated grey, brown and green, relatively straight and stick-
like in shape but with the head not truncate; the thoracic ‘horn’ is
rudimentary and parallel with the body axis. Larval food plants are various
species of Rutaceae, including cultivated Citrus.
The early stages and male genitalia indicate a close relationship between
Eleppone and Chilasa (Igarashi 1976, Hancock 1983), particularly the mature
larval morphology, the shape of the pupal thoracic ‘horn’, the posteroventral
spine on the male clasper and the curved aedeagus. However, the slightly
curved pupa with a non-truncate head and the rutaceous larval food plants
also indicate a close relationship with Heraclides, these characters being
modified in Chilasa.
Discussion
The species currently included in Agehana do not appear to be as closely
allied to those placed in Chilasa as previously believed; the early stages in
particular are very different. The true relationships of the Agehana species
appear to be with the American genus Prerourus and, wing shape and pattern
aside, there do not appear to be any differences significant enough to
recognise it as a separate genus. This, together with the apparent intermediate
nature of the mature larva, between subgenera Pterourus and Pyrrhosticta,
suggest that a subgeneric placement of Prerourus (Agehana) is the most
appropriate, with subgenus Prerourus as its most likely sister-group.
The present distribution of the Agehana species in China and Taiwan appears
to be a result of Beringian dispersal from a North American Prerourus
(Pterourus) ancestor, possibly now represented by Pf. esperanza, which
subsequently radiated throughout Central and North America as the glaucus
and froilus groups of Hancock (1983). This dispersal appears to have
occurred after the Pferourus-Pyrrhosticta split, which saw the latter subgenus
radiate widely throughout South and Central America. Beringian dispersal
from the Palaearctic to North America has evidently occurred in other
papilionids, such as Parnassius Latreille and the Papilio machaon group, so
movement in the other direction is not especially surprising.
Removal of the Agehana species from Chilasa enables the latter genus to be
more rigidly defined and larval and genitalic similarities within both it and
Heraclides (see Tyler et al. 1994) suggest that each genus is monophyletic.
The relationship is thus one of common ancestry rather than a derivation of
Chilasa from within Heraclides. Its present distribution in the Indo-
Australian region is undoubtedly a result of Gondwanan dispersal from South
America and this appears to have been accompanied by a switch in larval
food plants from Rutaceae to Lauraceae.
Current distribution of the various Chilasa species closely mirrors that of the
Trogonoptera-Troides-Ornithoptera lineage in tribe Troidini (see Hancock
Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1) 11
2007), suggesting a possible centre of origin in the SE Asian (Sundaland)
block rather than the Greater Indian block. The fact that SE Asian Chilasa
species mimic danaines rather than troidines in the Atrophaneura group of
genera [which appear to be primitively associated with the Greater Indian
block: Hancock 2007] also suggests that they evolved apart. Dispersal
eastwards to New Guinea and the Solomon Islands (as in the case of
Ornithoptera Boisduval) is supported by the apparently derived nature of the
laglaizei group, in which the larvae and pupae are highly modified.
Specific relationships within Chilasa are difficult to determine. Apart from
the distinctive laglaizei group (C. laglaizei, C. moerneri, C. toboroi), the
male genitalia (where known) do not show distinct patterns of similarity and
life history details are unknown for several species. In the polymorphic C.
paradoxa and C. clytia the hindwing vein Rs arises near the base of the discal
cell, in C. veiovis, C. osmana and C. carolinensis it arises centrally and in the
other species it arises closer to the apex of the cell. C. veiovis shows the large
size and apically produced forewings typical of many Sulawesian
swallowtails and has an uncertain mimetic association. Its hind wing retains
the tooth to vein M; and position of vein Rs seen in Eleppone anactus and it
is possibly a relict representative of the ancestral species.
Given its apparently intermediate position between Heraclides and Chilasa,
the Australian E/eppone is best retained as a separate genus, sister to (but
more primitive than) the Indo-Papuan genus Chilasa. Like the latter genus, it
also appears to be a result of Gondwanan dispersal from a South American
ancestor and its more primitive position suggests that Chilasa reached the
Sundaland block via Australia. At some time in the past, E. anactus was
presumably restricted to eastern Australia, developing its mimetic pattern
following an overlap with Cressida cressida. Its present distribution beyond
the range of the latter is presumably a result of Citrus cultivation in modern
times. Its absence from most of northern Australia suggests that (unlike C.
cressida: Hancock 2007) it is not an invader from the north. Unfortunately,
this taxon was not considered by de Jong (2003) in his study of potential
Gondwanan relicts but its apparent relationship with Chilasa and Heraclides
suggests that a Gondwanan ancestry is likely.
Eleppone is also likely to be contemporaneous with the endemic Australian
genus Protographium Munroe [tribe Leptocircini]. Male genitalic characters
(particularly the shape of the clasper) show that American species included in
the latter genus by Tyler er al. (1994) are better placed in Protesilaus
Swainson [= Mimoides Brown, which grades into it via P. asius (Fabricius)
and P. agesilaus (Guérin-Méneville)] or Eurytides Hübner (see Hancock
1983). Eurytides bellerophon (Dalman) was transferred from Protesilaus by
Tyler et al. (1994), while Jphiclides Hübner, Graphium Scopoli and
Lamproptera Gray (see Miller 1987) appear to belong to a separate,
Laurasian radiation (c.f. Papilio + Princeps).
12 Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1)
The above discussion suggests that the current arrangement of recognising
Chilasa as a separate genus and including Prerourus, Heraclides and
Eleppone as subgenera of Papilio (e.g. Häuser et al. 2005) is untenable, since
it results in a paraphyletic classification. Either all must be treated as
subgenera of the ‘supergenus’ Papilio sens. lat. (essentially following Miller
1987), or Pterourus, Heraclides and Eleppone must also be treated as distinct
genera, as suggested by Hancock (1983). The latter arrangement enables a
clearer expression of the diversity and relationships of the 200+ species of
‘fluted’ swallowtails by way of further subgeneric divisions.
Acknowledgement
I thank Dr A.G. Orr for helpful comments on the manuscript.
References
BEUTELSPACHER, C.R. 1975. Una especie nueva de Papilio L. (Papilionidae). Revista de la
Sociedad Mexicana de Lepidopterologia 1(1): 3-6; front and back covers.
DE JONG, R. 2003. Are there butterflies with Gondwanan ancestry in the Australian region?
Invertebrate Systematics 17: 143-156.
FISHER, R.H. 1978. Butterflies of South Australia. Government Printer, Adelaide; 272 pp.
HANCOCK, D.L. 1979. The systematic position of Papilio anactus Macleay (Lepidoptera:
Papilionidae). Australian Entomological Magazine 6(3): 49-53.
HANCOCK, D.L. 1983. Classification of the Papilionidae (Lepidoptera): a phylogenetic
approach. Smithersia 2: 1-48.
HANCOCK, D.L. 2007. Phylogeny of the troidine butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae)
revisited: are the red-bodied swallowtails monophyletic? Australian Entomologist 34(2): 33-42.
HAUSER, C.L., DE JONG, R., LAMAS, G., ROBBINS, R.K., SMITH, C. and VANE-
WRIGHT, R.I. 2005. Papilionidae — revised GloBIS/GART species checklist (2nd draft).
http://www. insects-online.de/frames/papilio.htm
HE, C., WANG, Y. and LUO, X. (Eds). 1992. Atlas of Chinese butterflies. Shanghai; 240 pp. [in
Chinese].
IGARASHI, S. 1976. What characterizes the genus Chilasa? It is represented in South America.
Yadoriga 87-88: 3-16. [in Japanese].
IGARASHI, S. 1984. The classification of the Papilionidae mainly based on the morphology of
their immature stages. Tyô to Ga 34(2): 41-96.
MILLER, J.S. 1987. Phylogenetic studies in the Papilioninae (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae).
Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 186(4): 365-512.
MULLER, C.J. 2001. Notes on the life history of Chilasa moerneri moerneri (Aurivillius)
(Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Australian Entomologist 28(1): 27-31.
SMITH, C.R. and VANE-WRIGHT, R.I. 2008. Classification, nomenclature and identification
of lime swallowtail butterflies: a post-cladistic analysis (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Systematics
and Biodiversity 6(2): 175-203.
STRAATMAN, R. 1975. Notes on the biologies of Papilio laglaizei and P. toboroi
(Papilionidae). Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 29(3): 180-187.
TYLER, H.A., BROWN, K.S., Jr and WILSON, K.H. 1994. Swallowtail butterflies of the
Americas: a study in biological dynamics, ecological diversity, biosystematics, and conservation.
Scientific Publishers, Gainesville; 377 pp.
Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1): 13-20 13
THE GENUS PAMBORUS LATREILLE (COLEOPTERA:
CARABIDAE) IN THE SLOANE COLLECTION AND ITS
IMPORTANCE FOR CURRENT TAXONOMY
YASUOKI TAKAMI' and TOM A. WEIR?
"Department of Zoology, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa-Oiwake,
Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan ;
Present address: Graduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University,
Tsurukabuto 3-11, Nada, Kobe 657-8501, Japan (Email: takami@people.kobe-u.ac.jp)
?Australian National Insect Collection, CSIRO Entomology, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT
2601, Australia
Abstract
We report on the holdings of Pamborus Latreille in the Sloane Collection preserved in the
Australian National Insect Collection, Canberra. The collection consists of ten species with 55
individuals. We point out the importance of the collection in current taxonomy and biogeography
of the genus. A lectotype is designated for Pamborus elegans Sloane.
Introduction
The genus Pamborus Latreille, 1812 is a group of flightless ground beetles
endemic to the eastern coastal region from southern New South Wales
(NSW) to northern Queensland (Qld) in Australia. Bänninger (1940) was the
last to revise this genus, although Darlington (1961) described four additional
species in this genus from the subtropical and tropical regions of Qld. As a
result, Moore et al. (1987) recognized 12 species in the genus Pamborus.
However, species diversity, phylogenetic relationships and distributional
ranges of the genus have not been sufficiently understood and a
comprehensive taxonomic revision has been needed. The senior author and
his colleagues have attempted to revise this genus by employing novel types
of data: genital morphology (internal sac of male intromittent organ) and
molecular phylogenetics (mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences) (Sota
et al. 2005, Takami and Sota 2006). Currently, the genus Pamborus
comprises 16 species, although our revisional studies are continuing.
Thomas Gibson Sloane (1858-1932) was a sheep grazier and entomologist
who devoted his life to the taxonomy of Australian Carabidae (ground
beetles), including the Cicindelinae (tiger beetles). He later became a world
authority on Carabidae (Walsh 1988). After his death, his collection of
Australian carabids was donated to the then Commonwealth Council for
Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) in 1932 and is now preserved in the
Australian National Insect Collection (ANIC), Canberra. His collection of
carabids was thorough, being described as ‘the only extant collection of
Australian Caraboidea ever put together by a specialist recognized the world
over’ (Walsh 1988). However, by the time it was donated to CSIR it had
suffered badly due to Anthrenus attack, with perhaps only 50% of specimens
remaining intact.
14 Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1)
In the course of our revisional studies on the genus Pamborus, we examined
the specimens in the Sloane Collection and obtained important information
for the taxonomy of the genus. With respect to the locality data, we discuss
the scientific values of the collection for clarifying distributional ranges of
the species. Sloane (1915) did not designate a holotype for P. elegans Sloane
in his original description, which was based on two female specimens
regarded as syntypes by Moore er al. (1987). A lectotype for the species P.
elegans (Fig. 1) is designated herein to stabilize the nomenclature
(International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) article 74).
A B
N
Fig. 1. The lectotype of Pamborus elegans Sloane: (A) dorsal habitus; (B) labels
attached.
Materials and methods
When the collection was acquired by CSIR in 1932, some of the specimens
were seriously damaged. Specimens damaged beyond recognition were not
included in this study. We selected well-preserved, intact specimens from
Sloane’s original wooden cabinet drawers that are currently stored in steel
drawers. We determined these based on external and genital (if available)
morphologies in accordance with the current taxonomic system (Moore et al.
Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1) 15
1987, Takami and Sota 2006). We have attempted to clarify the localities
from the labels.
Pamborus elegans Sloane
(Fig. 1)
Pamborus elegans Sloane, 1915: 438-439. Type locality: ‘Herberton District,
southward from Atherton, Queensland’.
Pamborus elegans: Bänninger, 1940: 204; Darlington, 1961: 2, 5-6; Moore et al.,
1987: 63.
Material examined. Lectotype 9 (here designated) of P. elegans Sloane: labelled
‘Herberton N.Q. Dodd’, ‘HOLOTYPE. Pamborus elegans SI. PJD’, ‘SYNTYPE’, and
“LECTOTYPE Pamborus elegans Sloane Takami & Weir, 2008’, in ANIC.
Comments. Although this specimen was labelled as ‘HOLOTYPE’ by
Darlington (PJD, above), there has been no designation of holotype or
lectotype in Sloane (1915) or Darlington (1961). Since Sloane (1915)
described this species based on two female syntypes, the other syntype
becomes a paralectotype on the present designation of the lectotype, even
though it was not found in the collection.
Results and discussion
The genus Pamborus in the Sloane Collection consists of 10 species with 55
individuals in total (Table 1). This covers 10 of the 16 currently known
species (Moore et al. 1987, Takami and Sota 2006). Six of the eight species
known to Sloane (at the first third of the 20th century) are involved: P.
alternans Latreille, 1812, P. guerinii Gory, 1831, P. macleayi Laporte, 1867,
P. brisbanensis Laporte, 1867, P. pradieri Chaudoir, 1869, and P. elegans
Sloane, 1915 (Table 1). The two species not present (P. viridis Gory, 1836
and P. opacus Géhin, 1885) are either rare or taxonomically problematic
(only the type is known) respectively (Takami and Sota 2006; see below
about the identity of P. viridis). i
Although the total number of individuals is small, specimens are from a wide
distributional range (Fig. 2). This reflects Sloane’s enthusiasm for collecting
and studying this group of beetles, which resulted in his revisional study on
the genus (Sloane 1905) and the description of P. elegans from Herberton on
the Atherton Tableland, northern Qld (Sloane 1915). Since P. elegans has
never been collected from the type locality after his record (Bänninger 1940,
Darlington 1961), the specimen in his collection (lectotype, present
designation) is quite important for clarifying the distributional range of this
species. The label of the lectotype of P. elegans (Fig. 1B) shows that it was
collected by Frederick Parkhurst Dodd. As pointed out by Monteith (1991),
Dodd’s own account of his collecting trip in 1910-1911 (Dodd 1911) shows
that his ‘Herberton’ material was collected in the moist forests on the Evelyn
Tableland, 15 km SSE of the dry locality of Herberton. Dodd mentioned
taking ‘a handsome Pamborus’, which probably refers to P. elegans.
16 Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1)
Table 1. List of identifiable Pamborus species from Sloane Collection incorporated
into the Australian National Insect Collection, CSIRO, Canberra (ANIC).
Species [total number of specimens] Locality Number
Pamborus alternans Latreille, 1812 [18] Bellinger River, NSW 1
Burrawang, NSW
Eccleston, NSW 3
Ourimbah, NSW l
Bunya Mts, Qld 2
Goodna, Qld 1
Mt Tamborine, Qld 4
locality unclear 3
without locality l
Pamborus brisbanensis Laporte, 1867 [1] Byfield, Qld l
Pamborus elegans Sloane, 1905 [1] Herberton, Qld ! |
Pamborus guerinii Gory, 1831 [13] Acacia Creek, NSW l
Bellingen, NSW l
Clarence River, NSW 1
Dorrigo, NSW 4
NSW/Qld l
Qld 2
locality unclear l
without locality 2
Pamborus macleayi Laporte, 1867 [5] Clarence River, NSW ? 2
Richmond River, NSW 2
locality unclear l
Pamborus monteithi Takami & Sota, 2006 [1] Burnett River, Qld |
Pamborus moorei Takami & Sota, 2006 [4] Guyra, NSW 1
Orange, NSW l
Dalveen, Qld 2
Pamborus pradieri Chaudoir, 1869 [5] Dorrigo, NSW 3
Eccleston, NSW l
without locality l
Pamborus subtropicus Darlington, 1961 [4] Acacia Creek, NSW |
Rockhampton, Qld l
Yeppoon, Qld l
locality unclear l
3
Pamborus tropicus Darlington, 1961 [3] Kuranda, Qld
' Lectotype, present designation; ? type locality.
Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1) 17
@ Pamborus alternans
O P. brisbanensis
E P. elegans
Ope. guerinit
A P. macleayi
A P. monteithi
% P. moorei
vy P. pradieri
® P. subtropicus
P. tropicus
| VICTORIA .
Fig. 2. Localities of Pamborus specimens in the Sloane Collection.
18 Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1)
The Sloane collection contains four species that were undescribed at that
time: P. subtropicus Darlington, 1961, P. tropicus Darlington, 1961, P.
moorei Takami & Sota, 2006 and P. monteithi Takami & Sota, 2006 (Table
1). Sloane did not describe these species (Sloane 1905, 1915), probably
because they are difficult to recognize on the basis of their external
morphologies. These species have been confused with P. viridis or its related
species because they all share greenish elytra with the costae almost
continuous to the apex. They were recognized only very recently using male
genital morphology and/or DNA sequence data (Sota et al. 2005, Takami and
Sota 2006).
We could not find P. opacus in the collection, although it was listed by
Sloane (1905) (but this may be P. euopacus with respect to its locality
presented in the literature; see also Takami and Sota 2006). The specimen(s)
of this species might be lost due to damage and, unfortunately, we could not
obtain any information from the broken parts of the beetles.
Of the four ‘undescribed’ species collected by Sloane, P. moorei was recently
described from Wollomombi, NSW and was assumed to be widespread in
northern NSW (Takami and Sota 2006). This idea is supported by Sloane’s
locality data for this species in the collection (Table 1, Fig. 2): from Orange,
NSW to the border area between NSW and Qld. Recently, we also confirmed
this distribution pattern based on an examination of specimens of P. moorei
in the Queensland Museum (Takami and Monteith, unpublished data).
‘Pamborus viridis’ presented in the list of Sloane (1905) may correspond to
P. moorei, because these two species have been confused until recently
(Takami and Sota 2006) and we could not find true P. viridis in the
collection.
Pamborus monteithi is another ‘undescribed’ species found in the Sloane
Collection, which has been known only from Kroombit Tops, Qld (Monteith
1986, Takami and Sota 2006, Takami and Monteith, unpublished data). This
species is conspicuous in its large size, brilliant colour and strongly hooked
apex of the aedeagus (Takami and Sota 2006). The single male specimen in
the collection is labelled from Burnett River, Qld, which is a new distribution
record for this species (Table 1). Although detailed locality of collection is
unclear, it may be an upper region of this river system, some tributaries of
which reach to the southern foot of Kroombit Tops. Thus, the specimen of P.
monteithi in the collection revealed that this species might have a wider
distributional range than known previously.
The present list of the genus Pamborus in the Sloane Collection indicates not
only its historical value, but also its importance in the taxonomy of the genus
as discussed above. Data from historical collecting localities are quite
important especially in flightless insects with low dispersal ability, which are
likely to show conspicuous geographical variation and local extinction,
possibly due to recent anthropological disturbance. The Sloane Collection
Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1) 19
allows us to turn our thoughts to a century ago and helps current
entomologists better understand the diversity of this group.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr Geoff Monteith (Queensland Museum) for his support in
conducting museum works and publishing the paper, Dr Akira Shimizu
(Tokyo Metropolitan University, Japan) for giving information about the
bibliography of Sloane, and Dr Barry Moore (CSIRO, Canberra), Dr Teiji
Sota (Kyoto University, Japan), Dr Pier Mauro Giachino (Regional Natural
History Museum of Turin, Italy) and Prof. Achille Casale (University of
Sassari, Italy) for their help in various ways. Supported in part by Grants-in-
Aid from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) to YT SB;
19770014).
References
BÄNNINGER, M. 1940. On Australian Pamborini, Ozaenini and Scaritini (Coleoptera,
Carabidae). Novitates Zoologicae 42: 203-213.
CHAUDOIR, M. de 1869. Descriptions de Cicindéletes et de Carabiques nouveaux. Revue et
Magasin de Zoologie Pure et Applique (series 2) 21: 22-28, 64-70, 114-122, 170-173, 203-208.
DARLINGTON, P.J., Jr. 1961. Australian carabid beetles VI. The tropical and some subtropical
species of Pamborus, Mystropomus, and Nurus. Breviora 142: 1-13.
DODD, F.P. 1911. A collecting trip to the Herberton district, North Queensland. Victorian
Naturalist 28: 131-142.
GEHIN, J.B. 1885. Catalogue Synonymique et Systématique des Coleopteres de la Tribu des
Carabides. V. Jacquot, Remiremont, France; 141 pp.
GORY, H.L. 1831. [Description of Pamborus guerinii]. Magasin d’entomologie 1: no. 26, Classe
ix, pl 26.
GORY, H.L. 1836. Monographie du genere Pambore. Magasin de Zoologie 5: Classe ix, pls 166
et 167.
LAPORTE de CASTELNAU, F.L. 1867. Notes on Australian Coleoptera. Royal Society of
Victoria, Melbourne; 139 pp. [separates available prior to publication in Transactions and
Proceedings of Royal Society of Victoria 8: 30-38 (1867), 95-225 (1868)]
LATREILLE, P.A. 1812. Insectes part 2. Pp 361-722, in: Olivier, M (ed.), Encyclopédie
Methodique. Volume 8. Panckoucke, Paris.
MONTEITH, G.B. 1986. Insects from Kroombit Tops, Queensland, with some results of a site
survey of Coleoptera. Queensland Naturalist 27: 27-34.
MONTEITH, G.B. 1991. The Butterfly Man of Kuranda. Frederick Parkhurst Dodd. Queensland
Museum, Brisbane; 34 pp.
MOORE, B.P., WEIR, T.A. and PYKE, J.E. 1987. Carabidae. Pp 23-320, in: Walton, D.W.
(ed.), Zoological Catalogue of Australia, Volume 4. Coleoptera: Achostemata, Myxophaga and
Adephaga. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra; viii + 444 pp.
SLOANE, T.G. 1905. Revisional notes on Australian Carabidae. Part I. Tribes Carabini,
Pamborini, Pseudozaenini, Clivini; and the Genus Nebriosoma. Proceedings of the Linnean
Society of New South Wales 29: 699-733.
20 Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1)
SLOANE, T.G. 1915. Studies in Australian entomology, No. xvii. New genera and species of
Carabidae. (Pamborini, Migadopini, Broscini, Cuneipectini, Nomiini, Pterostichini, Platynini,
Oodini, Harpalini, and Lebiini.). Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 40:
438-473.
SOTA, T., TAKAMI, Y., MONTEITH, G.B. and MOORE, B.P. 2005. Phylogeny and character
evolution of endemic Australian carabid beetles of the genus Pamborus based on mitochondrial
and nuclear gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 36: 391-404.
TAKAMI, Y. and SOTA, T. 2006. Four new species of the Australian Pamborus Latreille
(Coleoptera, Carabidae) carabid beetles. Australian Journal of Entomology 45: 44-54.
WALSH, G.P. 1988. Sloane, Thomas Gibson (1858-1932). Pp 635-636, in: Australian
Dictionary of Biography, Volume 11. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne.
Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1): 21-22 21
NEW RECORDS OF BUTTERFLIES (LEPIDOPTERA) FROM THE
PORT MACQUARIE AREA, NEW SOUTH WALES
A.S. MOORE! and S.G. GINN?
1379 Lake Innes Drive, Wauchope, NSW 2446
"Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney, NSW 2010
Abstract
Southern range extensions are provided for Doleschallia bisaltide australis C. & R. Felder,
Euploea tulliolus tulliolus (Fabricius) and Euchrysops cnejus cnidus Waterhouse & Lyell,
together with additional records of Argynnina cyrila Waterhouse & Lyell and Zizula hylax
attenuata (Lucas) from the mid-north coast and hinterland of New South Wales.
Introduction
Braby (2000) and Common and Waterhouse (1981) recorded the distributions
of various eastern Australian butterfly species as extending from the
Queensland tropics to the north coast of New South Wales. Preserved areas
of rainforest and high altitude forest on the mid-north coast of NSW, in
particular near Port Macquarie, might be able to support species dependent
on these environments, either as remnant populations or during southern
population movements during suitable climatic periods. Between 2004 and
2008, several butterfly species were newly recorded in the area.
New records and observations
NYMPHALIDAE
Doleschallia bisaltide australis C. & R. Felder, 1867
Three adults were observed flying in littoral rainforest at Miners Beach in
Sea Acres Nature Reserve, Port Macquarie, in February 2006. They were in
varying degrees of wear and a further, fresh individual was observed in the
same area on 12 March 2006. On 16 January 2007, an adult was observed
along Stoney Creek Road at Middle Brother National Park, near Laurieton. A
further adult was observed at Miners Beach on 26 September 2007. The
distance between these sightings is 33 km. On 10 April 2008, a late instar
larva was collected at the first author’s home in Wauchope (located between
the previous two sightings), feeding on Pseuderanthemum variabile (R. Br.)
Radlk. (Acanthaceae). It pupated on 21 April and the adult [in A. Moore
collection] emerged 29 days later on 19 May. The southern range limit for
this species was previously recorded as Clarence River near Grafton (Braby
2000, Common and Waterhouse 1981) and these observations represent a
range extension of approximately 200 km to the south. It is possible that this
species was imported to the area on nursery stock, but the observations have
all been in remnant rainforest and at all locations, including A. Moore’s
home, the larval food plant is native to the area. At Middle Brother NP, the
location is not close to any dwellings. D. b. australis appears to be
established in this area. The food plant P. variabile occurs as far south as
Bega in southern NSW (NSW Flora Online 2008).
22 Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1)
Euploea tulliolus tulliolus (Fabricius, 1793)
This species was observed, possibly ovipositing, in littoral rainforest at
Miners Beach in Sea Acres Nature Reserve, Port Macquarie, on 12 March
2006. The previously recorded southern range limit for this species was
Urunga (Common and Waterhouse 1981) and this new record extends the
range 104 km to the south, although establishment is not confirmed.
Argynnina cyrila Waterhouse & Lyell, 1914
Specimens, including mating pairs and ovipositing females, were observed in
large numbers at the summit of North Brother Mountain on 19-21 September
2007. Both sexes were also observed at Honeysuckle Rest Area in Barrington
Tops National Park on 12 October 2007, confirming a previous sighting by
Russell Mayo. Braby (2000) inferred a discontinuous distribution that
corresponded with the data points in Dunn and Dunn (1991). The current
observations provide new data points for previously recorded gaps in the
known distribution.
LYCAENIDAE
Euchrysops cnejus cnidus Waterhouse & Lyell, 1914
A fresh adult male and female were collected at Forbes River, Birdwood on
25 March 2004, flying with Everes lacturnus australis Couchman. The
southern range limit for this species was previously listed as Coffs Harbour
(Braby 2000) and near Guyra (Dunn and Dunn 1991). This record extends the
southern range limit by 140 km.
Zizula hylax attenuata (Lucas, 1890)
Glen Innes is the listed southern limit for this species, with occasional
sightings recorded at Denman, Wingham and Sydney (Dunn and Dunn 1991).
Three adults were collected at Forbes River, Birdwood on 25 March 2004,
further suggesting that this species’ range is spreading southwards.
Acknowledgement
We are grateful to Russell Mayo for his advice in compiling the manuscript.
References
BRABY, M.F. 2000. Butterflies of Australia, their identification, biology and distribution.
CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood; xx + 976 pp.
COMMON, I.F.B. and WATERHOUSE, D.F. 1981. Butterflies of Australia. Revised edition.
Angus and Robertson, Sydney; xiv + 682 pp, 49 pls.
DUNN, K.L. and DUNN, L.E. 1991. Review of Australian butterflies: distribution, life history
and taxonomy. Parts 1-4. Published privately, Melbourne; 660 pp.
NSW FLORA ONLINE. 2008. Accessed 23 May 2008. htrp:/plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/
Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1): 23-28 23
A LARVAL FOOD PLANT FOR ATTEVA ALBIGUTTATA (ZELLER)
(LEPIDOPTERA: YPONOMEUTIDAE: ATTEVINAE)
D.R. BRITTON! and J. COUPER?
‘Entomology, Australian Museum, 6 College St. Sydney, NSW 2010
(Email: dave. britton@austmus.gov.au)
Field Operations Coordinator, EnviTE NSW, PO Box 918, Coffs Harbour, NSW 2450
(Email: justinc@envite.org.au)
Abstract
An undescribed and endangered species of Quassia (family Simaroubaceae) is recorded as a
larval food plant for Atteva albiguttata (Zeller). Descriptions of the final instar larva and pupa
are provided, together with a discussion on potential food plant range and mimicry.
Introduction
In March 2007, the primary author received an enquiry from J. Couper about
the identity of moth larvae that were damaging an undescribed species of
Quassia, the Moonee Quassia, Quassia sp. Moonee Creek (J. King s.n., Nov
1949) NSW Herbarium (Family Simaroubaceae) (APNI 2008). The Moonee
Quassia is restricted to the Moonee Creek - Timbertop area north of Coffs
Harbour, New South Wales (PlantNET 2007) and has received targeted
investment funding under the Natural Heritage Trust and other programs (for
further details see Mathews and Couper 2007). Due to the limited distribution
of this plant, there is concern that the moth could have a deleterious effect on
plant populations by slowing their growth and possibly decreasing seed
production. Four pupae were supplied in March 2007, from which adults
subsequently emerged. These were identified as the yponomeutid Atteva
albiguttata (Zeller, 1873) (Fig. 1). Additional material was made available in
January 2008 and the following brief descriptions of the larval and pupal
stages were made, along with some life history observations.
Material examined
NEW SOUTH WALES: 2 0’0’, 1 9, emerged 25.iii.2007 from 4 pupae
collected 15.iii.2007, Maccues Rd, Moonee Beach, 30°12'29"S, 153°08'44"E,
J. Couper; 6 late instar larvae, 15.1.2008, same locality and collector. Adult
specimens are stored in the Australian Museum, Sydney.
Immature stages and life history
Final instar larva (Fig. 2). Elongate, approx. 30 mm long, anteclypeus pale
translucent yellow, frontoclypeus bright lemon yellow, adfrontal region
flanking frontoclypeus cream, indistinct cream marking dorsal to eyes, basal
segment of antenna and labrum dirty cream, remainder of head glossy black,
sutures cream. Ground colour of body segments dull dark chocolate-brown.
Anterior prothorax and prothoracic shield bright yellow; pattern of
subsequent thoracic segments gradually discernable on posterior dorsal
region of segment. Ventrolateral regions of meso- and metathoracic segments
bright yellow ventral from spiracles, with dark brown markings dorsad of
24 Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1)
Figs 1-2. Atteva albiguttata. (1) freshly emerged adult male; (2) late instar larva in
webbing on Moonee Quassia. Photos by D. Britton.
legs. Coxae cream and black, distal segments of legs glossy black.
Longitudinal irregular lines running from prothorax to abdominal segment 10
as follows: faint dorsal and two strong dorsolateral lines level with dorsal
setae cream, line level with subdorsal setae bright yellow, line ventral to
spiracles cream, well developed; line level with subventral setae thin, bright
Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1) 25
Par. A
Figs 3-4. Atteva albiguttata pupa. (3) lateral view; (4) dorsal view, suspended in
webbing on Moonee Quassia. Photos by D. Britton (3) or J. Couper (4).
yellow; ventral line cream, well developed; all of the above cream lines
gradually becoming yellow at prothoracic and abdominal segments posterior
to abdominal segment 7. Setae white, erect and very long.
Pupa (Figs 3-4). Elongate, 11 to 13 mm long, retaining larval colouration.
Anterior margin of frontoclypeus with a pair of short acute projections level
26 Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1)
and mesad of antennal bases. Eyes banded black, brown and cream. Antennae
dark brown with bases cream. Prothorax mostly bright yellow, a pair of
minute white setae on dorsal posterior surface. Wing covers light brown with
white longitudinal streaks, wingtip of forewing reaching ventral posterior
region of abdominal segment 5; base of wing covers with a large yellow spot.
Abdominal spiracles dark red, visible from segments 3 to 8, absent from
segments 9-10. Ground colour of abdomen honey-brown for segments 1-5,
becoming darker brown for segments 6-8; longitudinal stripes as in larvae but
all coloured cream and only dorsal stripes visible on segments 9-10; both
segments 9 and 10 bright yellow anteriorly and black with an irregular
anterior margin posteriorly. Cremaster strongly sclerotised, spatulate and
square when viewed dorsally and with two pairs of very stout curved setae on
each posterior angle.
Life history. Larvae form loose webbing around branchlets of the food plant,
where they fed on growing tips, young growth and flower buds. Pupae
remain suspended in the larval webbing on the food plant (Fig. 4). Duration
of the pupal stage is approximately 12-14 days. Observations indicate that
immature stages are present on the food plant in the Moonee Creek region
from October to April, with webbing apparent by November when the plants
begin to bud. The last larvae are present in late April. Details of oviposition
behaviour and egg numbers are yet to be obtained.
Discussion
The genus Atteva Walker has a pantropical distribution, with more than 50
species currently described (Dugdale er al. 1999). The majority of published
larval food plant records are plant species from the family Simaroubaceae,
although plants in the families Leguminosae, Burseraceae, Santalaceae,
Araliaceae, Lauraceae and Meliaceae are also utilised by some species
(Dugdale et al. 1999, Robinson er al. 2008). For the four known Australian
species (Nielsen ei al. 1996), the only published food plant record is for A.
niphocosma Turner, 1903, which has been recorded feeding on Pencil Cedar
Polyscias murrayi (F.Muell.) Harms (Araliaceae) (V.J. Robinson, in
Common 1990). The observation of A. albiguttata feeding on the Moonee
Quassia is significant in that it indicates that at least one Australian Atteva
species has retained what seems to be a strong co-evolutionary association
between this moth genus and the Simaroubaceae.
Adult specimens held in the Australian Museum and Australian National
Insect Collection indicate that A. albiguttata occurs in coastal regions from
Tuncurry in New South Wales north to Mt Bellenden Ker in northern
Queensland. This raises the question as to what range of food plants are
utilised by A. albiguttata. The Australian Simaroubaceae consists of four
genera (Hewson 1985) containing at least thirteen indigenous species, many
of which are yet to be formally described, as well as the introduced noxious
weed species Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle (Tree of Heaven) (APNI
Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1) 27
2008, Guymer 2007). Given the environmental significance of A. altissima it
is unlikely that damage by A. albiguttata would have been overlooked, so it is
unlikely to be another food plant, although native species of Ailanthus may
be. Most of the indigenous species of Simaroubaceae in Australia have
restricted geographical distributions; this is reflected in two species of
Quassia being listed as endangered and vulnerable under Commonwealth
legislation, plus eight species which are still awaiting formal botanical
description. Only two species of Quassia are known to occur in New South
Wales and both have highly restricted distributions (PlantNet 2007, Floyd
2008). A. albiguttata has a broader known distribution than known for
indigenous Simaroubaceae, which strongly suggests that there are as yet
unknown alternative food plants for A. albiguttata from other plant families.
The Moonee Quassia is endemic to the NE coast of NSW and is currently
known from 18 locations between Moonee Beach and McCraes Knob (east of
Ulmarra) (Mathews and Couper 2007). It is a small tree that grows in coastal
wet sclerophyll forest, reaching 2 m in height. It is currently listed as
threatened, due to low numbers of plants in each discrete population, weed
infestation, grazing and fire (Department of Environment and Conservation
2005) and is listed as ‘Endangered’ under the Commonwealth Environment
Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 and the NSW Threatened
Species Conservation Act 1995. The impact of A. albiguttata on the
reproduction and health of Moonee Quassia plants has not yet been
quantified. Given the apparently strong co-evolutionary association of Atteva
spp. with plants in the family Simaroubaceae, it seems likely that the Moonee
Quassia has evolved in association with this insect herbivore. Further studies
of caterpillar herbivory would be useful in assessing this issue.
The apparently aposematic colouration of adults, larvae and pupae and the
apparent lack of concealment of larvae and pupae suggest that this species
may be distasteful to potential predators. Some aposematic herbivorous
insects are thought to derive defensive chemicals from secondary compounds
present in their food plants (Brower 1984). Knowledge of the plant chemistry
of species in the Simaroubaceae may allow predictions as to any potential
alternative food plants for A. albiguttata. Quassia spp. and other
Simaroubaceae contain bitter compounds classified as quassinoids. Many of
these compounds have been isolated, identified and laboratory tested in vivo
and in vitro. They have been found to have antitumor, antimalarial, antiviral,
anti-inflammatory, antifeedant, insecticidal, amoebicidal, antiulcer and
herbicidal activities, but their widespread application in human and livestock
medicine has been inhibited by their toxicity (Guo ei al. 2005). It is possible
that A. albiguttata and other Atteva species are sequestering these chemicals
for defensive purposes. Atteva might be mimics of other insects that are
distasteful and have similar colouration, in which case food plant choice may
not be important. Conversely, they might have more complex mimicry
associations with similarly coloured, tasteful or distasteful insects, in which
28 Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1)
case a better understanding of any potential benefits gained from food plant
selection may be obtained from further studies.
Acknowledgement
We thank Ted Edwards (ANIC, Canberra) for providing distribution data for
A. albiguttata.
References
APNI [AUSTRALIAN PLANT NAMES INDEX]. 2008. Accessed 31 March 2008.
http://www.anbg.gov.au/cgi-bin/apni
BROWER, L.P. 1984. Chemical defense in butterflies. Pp 109-34, in: Vane-Wright, R.I. and
Ackery, P.R. (eds.), The biology of butterflies. Symposium of the Royal Entomological Society of
London. Number 11. Academic Press, London; xxiv + 429 pp.
COMMON, LF.B. 1990. Moths of Australia. Melbourne University Press, Carlton; 535 pp.
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION (NSW). 2005. Approved
recovery plan for Quassia sp. Mooney Creek (Moonee Quassia). Department of Environment
and Conservation (NSW), Hurstville.
DUGDALE, J.S., KRISTENSEN, N.P., ROBINSON, G.S. and SCOBLE, M.J. 1999. The
` Yponomeutoidea. Pp.119-130, in: Kristensen, N.P. (ed.), Lepidoptera, moths and butterflies.
Volume 1. Evolution, systematics, and biogeography. Part 35, in: Fischer, M. (ed.), Handbuch
der Zoologie/Handbook of Zoology. Vol. IV. Arthropoda: Insecta, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin; x +
491 pp.
FLOYD, A.G. 2008. Rainforest trees of mainland south-eastern Australia. Terania Rainforest
Publishing, Lismore; 443 pp.
GUO, S., VANGAPANDU, S., SINDELAR, R.W., WALKER, L.A. and SINDELAR, R.D.
2005. Biologically active quassinoids and their chemistry: potential leads for drug design.
Current Medicinal Chemistry 12: 173-190.
GUYMER, G.P. 2007. Simaroubaceae. P. 338, in: Bostock, P.D. and Holland, A.E. (eds.),
Census of the Queensland flora 2007 (CDRom Version). Queensland Herbarium, Environment
Protection Agency, Brisbane; v + 507 pp.
HEWSON, H.J. 1985. Simaroubaceae. Flora of Australia 25: 188-196.
MATHEWS, S. and COUPER, J. 2007. Habitat recovery of the threatened species Moonee
Quassia. Australasian Plant Conservation 16: 26-28.
NIELSEN, E.S., EDWARDS, E.D. and RANGSI, T.V. (eds.). 1996. Checklist of the Lepidoptera
of Australia. Monographs on Australian Lepidoptera, Volume 4. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne;
xiv + 529 pp.
PLANTNET. 2007. The plant information network system of Botanic Gardens Trust, Sydney,
Australia. Accessed 20 August 2007. Attp://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au
ROBINSON, G.S., ACKERY, P.R., KITCHING, LJ., BECCALONI, G.W. and HERNANDEZ,
L.M. 2007. HOSTS - a database of the World’s lepidopteran hostplants. Accessed 27 March
2008. hitp:/Avww.nhm.ac. uk/research-curation/projects/hostplants/
Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1): 29-32 29
THE FIRST RECORD OF AN AMYCTERINE WEEVIL
(COLEOPTERA: CURCULIONIDAE: AMYCTERINAE) FEEDING
ON ORCHIDACEAE
NICK PORCH
Department of Archaeology and Natural History, RSPAS, The Australian National University,
Canberra, ACT 0200 (Email: nicholas.porch@anu.edu.au)
Abstract
Tetralophus sculpturatus Waterhouse is reported feeding on sun orchids (Thelymitra J.R. Forst.
& G. Forst.), the first record of amycterine weevils feeding on Orchidaceae.
Introduction
Until Howden (1986) published host records for ten genera of Amycterinae,
little was known concerning larval and adult food sources of these diverse
and endemic Australian weevils. Previous researchers had noted adult food
plants but understood little in regard to larval hosts. Howden’s (1986) studies
revealed that most, if not all, amycterines feed on monocotyledons (plant
classification here follows APG II (2003) in its widest sense), mainly Poales
[especially Poaceae, but also Cyperaceae (Lepidosperma), Ecdeiocoleaceae
(Ecdeiocolea) and Restionaceae (Lepidobolus)| and Asparagales
[Asparagaceae sensu lato (Dichopogon, Lomandra) and Xanthorrhoeaceae
sensu lato (Bulbine, Dianella, Stypandra, Xanthorrhoea)]. All records of
amycterines from eudicot groups were for adults only (Acacia, the
myrtaceous shrubs Melaleuca and Leptospermum and several genera of
Papilionaceae) and almost certainly do not represent real (larval) hosts
(Howden 1986).
Given the records of amycterines feeding on Asparagales (to which the
family Orchidaceae belongs), including soft lilies like Dichopogon and
Bulbine (Howden 1986, May 1994), it is surprising there are no published
records from orchids, especially given the attention orchid biology receives
from professional and amateur botanists. Here I report four independent
records of Tetralophus sculpturatus Waterhouse (Fig. 1) feeding on the
foliage of a sun orchid, Thelymitra J.R. Forst. & G. Forst. — probably a
member of the Thelymitra pauciflora R. Br. group. These are the first
confirmed host records for Tetralophus Waterhouse and of any amycterine
weevils feeding on orchids. Tetralophus contains only one other species, T.
excursus Pascoe, also occurring in southeastern Australia. Zimmerman
(1993), noting that “Terralophus species are extraordinarily and confusingly
variable’, synonymised the third previously recognized species, T. incanus
Pascoe, with T. sculpturatus Waterhouse. Examination of material in the
Museum of Victoria revealed a specimen of T. sculpturatus, without locality
information, but with the collection data ‘found in flower of orchids. W.K.
9.94’. These data are unclear, however, as to whether or not the individual
was feeding on the plant and also give no indication as to the identity of the
orchid genus.
30 Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1)
5 mm
Fig. 1. Ventral, frontal and oblique dorsal views of a specimen of Tetralophus
sculpturatus Waterhouse, collected 3.1 km WNW of Driffield, Victoria (deposited in
the Australian National Insect Collection).
Tetralophus has a relatively narrow Bassian distribution, including
southeastern South Australia, Victoria, southern New South Wales (Green
Cape, Sydney) and Tasmania (Flinders Island). Figure 2 shows the
distribution of Tetralophus as based on material in the Museum of Victoria
(Melbourne) and the Australian National Insect Collection (Canberra), as
well as on records in Zimmerman (1993) and by the author.
Observations
All new records are from remnant dry sclerophyll forest near the junction of
Vary’s Track and Golden Gully Road, 3.1 km WNW of Driffield, Victoria
(ca 38°15’52”S, 146°17’56”E, alt. 110 m). The voucher specimens deposited
in the Australian National Insect Collection and the Museum of Victoria
readily conform to the illustration of T. sculpturatus provided by
Zimmermann (1993) and other examined material.
The first observation of this host association reported here (by N. Porch and
R. Porch), on 1 August 1998, was of an individual that had ascended a 20 cm
long Thelymitra leaf about three-quarters of its length from the ground and
was feeding on one margin of the leaf when it was collected. The second
observation (by R. Porch), made on 6 October 2000, was of an individual
Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1) 31
found feeding on a Thelymitra stem. It had apparently consumed about 40%
of the stem, presumably by feeding from its tip and reversing down the stem
as it fed. This method of feeding makes these weevils rather conspicuous in
open forest as they cling to the leaf or stem as it waves precariously about.
The third observation (by R. Porch) occurred on 7 October 2001, and the
fourth, most recent one (by R. Porch) on 10 September 2005; both of weevils
retreating down a Thelymitra leaf as they consumed it. All four observations
were made between 10h00 and 16h00, suggesting that these weevils are
diurnal, an unusual habit that was previously noted for some other members
of the subfamily (Howden 1986).
%
0
fs
C Collection record for Tetralophus Waterhouse No
Fig. 2. Distribution records for Tetralophus Waterhouse and prediction of areas that
are bioclimatically suitable, based on the BIOCLIM modeling function of BioLink
(Shattuck and Fitzsimmons 2002). Prediction used annual and seasonal temperature
layers, annual precipitation and an additional custom layer of warm season rainfall
(precipitation of the warmest quarter); darker areas indicate climate types similar to
the majority of distribution records, lighter areas indicate climates at the margins of
the bioclimatic envelope for the genus where there are fewer collection records.
Discussion
Although larvae of this species were not located (a search would probably
impact on the local Thelymitra population considerably), it is likely that they
feed and develop within the orchid tubers or, alternatively, feed on the
underground stem of the plant. May (1994) noted that ‘all amycterine larvae
32 Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1)
found so far are, with one exception, soil dwellers, living free and feeding on
roots, or entering tubers, bulblets and corms of plants’; the exception being a
species of Acantholophus Boisduval that feeds in the crowns of
Xanthorrhoea.
It would be interesting to know whether Terralophus sculpturatus is restricted
in its host range to sun orchids or also feeds on other orchid genera, and
whether the other Tetralophus species, T. excursus Pascoe, has similar habits.
Further, given the widespread occurrence of Thelymitra and other succulent-
leaved terrestrial orchid genera (such as Calochilus, Prasophyllum and
Microtis) across the southern and eastern parts of the Australian continent, it
is surprising that Tetralophus is not also more widespread. It is possible that
elsewhere in the range of these orchid taxa, especially in southwestern
Australia, other genera of small amycterines may feed on them in a similar
way.
References
APG II. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and
families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 399-436.
HOWDEN, A.T. 1986. Notes on the biology of adult and immature Amycterinae (Coleoptera,
Curculionidae). Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 109: 91-105.
MAY, B. 1994. An Introduction to the immature stages of Australian Curculionoidea. Pp 365-
728, in: E. C. Zimmerman (ed.), Australian Weevils, Volume Il. Brentidae, Eurhynchidae,
Apionidae and a Chapter on Immature Stages by Brenda May. CSIRO, Melbourne.
SHATTUCK, S. and FITZSIMMONS, N. 2002. BioLink, the biodiversity information
management system (software and documentation). CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood.
ZIMMERMAN, E.C. 1993. Australian Weevils, Volume III, Nanophyidae, Erirhinidae,
Curculionidae: Amycterinae, Literature consulted. CSIRO, Melbourne; i-x + 1-854 pp.
Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1): 33-36 33
A RECORD OF DANAUS CHRYSIPPUS CRATIPPUS (C. FELDER)
(LEPIDOPTERA: NYMPHALIDAE: DANAINAE) FROM
THURSDAY ISLAND, TORRES STRAIT
TREVOR A. LAMBKIN
Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, 665 Fairfield Road, Yeerongpilly,
Old 4105 (Email: Trevor.Lambkin@dpi.gld.gov.au)
© The State of Queensland (Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries) 2009
Abstract
A female specimen of Danaus chrysippus cratippus (C. Felder) is recorded from Thursday
Island, Torres Strait, Queensland. This constitutes the second known specimen of this taxon from
Australia and the first record for Queensland. Due to the paucity of reference material of D.
petilia (Stoll) from Torres Strait, it is unclear whether this specimen of D. c. cratippus is a
vagrant or constitutes part of a natural sympatric distribution with D. petilia in northern
Australia. The known distribution of D. petilia in Torres Strait, based primarily on observation
records, is provided and encompasses almost all inhabited islands. Based on these records its
temporal distribution in Torres Strait appears irregular, perhaps reflecting its dispersive and
nomadic movements among the islands.
Introduction
The predominately Australian species Danaus petilia (Stoll) [originally
described as Papilio petilia Stoll], has recently been reinstated to its former
specific rank by Lushai er al. (2005). In Australia, D. petilia was considered
specifically distinct by all early major butterfly workers, e.g. Masters (1873),
Olliff (1889), Miskin (1891), Waterhouse (1903) and Rainbow (1907), until
Waterhouse and Lyell (1914) incorporated it into the Old World species
Danaus chrysippus (L.). Since then, all major Australian butterfly references
to this species (Waterhouse 1932, Common 1964, Common and Waterhouse
1972, 1981, Zalucki 1999, Braby 2000) concurred with Waterhouse and Lyell
(1914), including Talbot (1943) in his review of Danaus Kluk (Lushai et al.
2005). All concluded that D. c. petilia was the most easterly occurring
subspecies of D. chrysippus, although Zalucki (1999) had suggested that D. c.
petilia could be given specific status.
Although primarily Australian, D. petilia does occur infrequently in
neighbouring areas (Lushai er al. 2005). Ackery and Vane-Wright (1984)
reported it as uncommon in New Guinea, including its eastern islands and in
the region west of the New Guinea mainland (Lushai er al. 2005). Parsons
(1999) also considered it uncommon and local in Papua New Guinea with an
occasional record from the Moluccas, west of New Guinea. Further east it is
an uncommon visitor to the Solomon Islands, Vanuatu, New Caledonia and
New Zealand (Ackery and Vane-Wright 1984, Tennent 2002). Small
numbers of specimens of D. petilia are also known from Christmas and
Cocos (Keeling) Islands in the Indian Ocean (Ackery and Vane-Wright
1984). The closest area to Australia where true D. chrysippus is known is
eastern Indonesia where, from the Moluccas to Timor, Tanimbar and the Aru
Islands, the species is referable to D. c. cratippus (C. Felder) (Braby 2000,
34 Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1)
Lushai er al. 2005). D. chrysippus is highly dispersive and therefore it is not
surprising that scattered records of D. c. cratippus are known from New
Guinea and Australia (Ackery and Vane-Wright 1984, Braby 2000).
In Australia, D. chrysippus is currently known from only two specimens: a
female attributed to ‘form dorippus’ allegedly from Roebourne, Western
Australia and housed in The Natural History Museum, London (Talbot 1943,
Common and Waterhouse 1981, Braby 2000) [typical D. c. dorippus (Klug)
is from East Africa (Lushai er al. 2005) but the ‘form’ is widespread]; and a
male D. c. cratippus in the Australian National Insect Collection from
Cobourg Peninsula, Northern Territory, collected in January 1977 (Common
and Waterhouse 1981, Braby 2000). In this paper the discovery of an
additional specimen of D. c. cratippus is reported, collected flying on the
edge of monsoon vine forest at the western end of Thursday I., Torres Strait.
Abbreviations used for observation and collection records are: AIK — All.
Knight; AM — Australian Museum, Sydney; CGM — C.G. Miller; JWT — J.W.
Turner (ex DPIF, Qld); KH — K. Houston (ex DPIF, Qld); PSV — P.S.
Valentine; SJJ — S.J. Johnson; TAL — T.A. Lambkin; TLIKC — joint
collection of T.A. Lambkin and A.I. Knight, Brisbane; UQ — University of
Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane.
Danaus chrysippus cratippus (C. Felder)
(Fig. 1)
Material examined. QUEENSLAND (TORRES STRAIT): 1 9, Green Hill, Thursday
Island, 25.iv.1995, TAL (TLIKC).
Discussion. During a recent examination of specimens referred to D. petilia
in the author’s collection, it was noted that the external facies of a female
specimen collected from Thursday Island, Torres Strait (Fig. 1), generally
matched [except in size] that of D. c. cratippus as outlined in Lushai er al.
(2005) and verified by M.P. Zalucki and G. Daniels (UQ).
Despite Braby’s (2000) indication that D. petilia (Fig. 2) is common in the
Australian tropics and the many records of sightings on almost all inhabited
Torres Strait islands, there are few Torres Strait specimens known in
collections. This is most likely the result of a general neglect of this species
by butterfly collectors, due to its general commonness in Australia.
Currently in Torres Strait what is believed to be D. petilia has been observed
at various times on almost all inhabited islands: in the north of the strait on
Boigu, Dauan and Saibai Islands; in the east on Darnley and Murray; in the
central region on Badu, Moa and Yam; and in the south on Hammond, Horn,
Prince of Wales and Thursday Islands (Mathew 1885, De Baar 1988, Talbot
1943, Valentine and Johnson 1993, observation and collection records of
AIK, AM, CGM, JWT, KH, SJJ, PSV and TAL). In addition, the temporal
records of D. petilia on almost all Torres Strait islands appear irregular,
Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1) 35
perhaps reflecting its dispersive and nomadic movements among the islands
(Tennent 2002, Lushai er al. 2005).
Figs 1-2. Danaus spp. Both figures to scale, upperside left, underside right [forewing
lengths in parentheses]. (1) D. chrysippus cratippus, female: Green Hill, Thursday
Island, Torres Strait, Qld, 25.iv.1995, TAL [35 mm]; (2) D. petilia, female: Jamboree
Heights, Brisbane, Qld, 20.ix.1980, TAL [38 mm].
Taking into account that larval host plants of D. petilia are not often observed
on many of the Torres Strait islands (TAL unpublished data), its irregular
occurrence on these islands might reflect local introductions and extinctions
of the host plant and the butterfly. Therefore, due to the paucity of Torres
Strait material available for examination, it is unclear whether the specimen
of D. c. cratippus reported here is an isolated vagrant to Torres Strait or
represents part of a natural sympatric distribution with D. petilia in northern
Australia. Certainly, more intensive collecting of D. petilia and its congeners
in the tropical areas of Australia would be rewarding in supplementing the
current knowledge of their distributions in Australia.
Acknowledgements
Appreciation is given to A.I. Knight, S.J. Johnson, C.G. Miller and P.S.
Valentine for making available their observation records and the Australian
Museum, Sydney for access to their collection records. Prof M.P. Zalucki and
Mr G. Daniels (UQ) confirmed the identity of the Thursday Island specimen.
References
ACKERY, P.R. and VANE-WRIGHT, R.I. 1984. Milkweed butterflies. British Museum (Natural
History), London; ix + 425 pp.
BRABY, M.F. 2000. Butterflies of Australia: their identification, biology and distribution.
CSIRO publishing, Collingwood, Victoria; xx + 976 pp.
COMMON, LF.B. 1964. Australian butterflies. Jacaranda Press, Brisbane; 131 pp.
COMMON, I.F.B. and WATERHOUSE, D.F. 1972. Butterflies of Australia. Angus and
Robertson, Sydney; xii + 498 pp.
36 Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1)
COMMON, LF.B. and WATERHOUSE, D.F. 1981. Butterflies of Australia. Revised edition.
Angus and Robertson, Sydney; xiv + 682 pp.
DE BAAR, M. 1988. Insects collected during a trip to Torres Strait 27 March to 10 April, 1987.
News Bulletin of the Entomological Society of Queensland 15(9): 107-117.
LUSHAI, G., ZALUCKI, M.P., SMITH, D.A.S., GOULSON, D. and DANIELS, G. 2005. The
lesser wanderer, Danaus petilia (Stoll 1790) stat. rev. (Lepidoptera: Danainae), reinstated as a
species. Australian Journal of Entomology 44: 6-14.
MASTERS, G. 1873. Catalogue of the described diurnal Lepidoptera of Australia. Sydney; iv +
24 pp.
MATHEW, G.F. 1885. An afternoon among the butterflies of Thursday Island. Proceedings of
the Linnean Society of New South Wales 10(2): 259-266.
MISKIN, W.H. 1891. A synonymical catalogue of the Lepidoptera Rhopalocera (butterflies) of
Australia with full bibliographical reference; including descriptions of some new species. Annals
of the Queensland Museum 1: i-xx, 1-93, i-ix.
OLLIFF, A.S. 1889. Australian butterflies: a brief account of the native families. The Natural
History Association of New South Wales, Sydney; 49 pp.
PARSONS, M.J. 1998. The butterflies of Papua New Guinea: their systematics and biology.
Academic Press, London; xvi + 736 pp, xxvi+ 136 pls.
RAINBOW, W.J. 1907. A guide to the study of Australian butterflies. Wayside Press,
Melbourne; 272 pp.
TALBOT, G. 1943. Revisional notes on the genus Danaus Kluk (Lep. Rhop. Danaidae).
Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 93: 115-148.
TENNENT, W.J. 2002. Butterflies of the Solomon Islands: systematics and biogeography. Storm
Entomological Publications, Dereham, Norfolk; 413 pp, 90 pls.
VALENTINE, P.S. and JOHNSON, S.J. 1993. The butterflies of Moa Island, Torres Strait.
Victorian Entomologist 23: 116-121.
WATERHOUSE, G.A. 1903. A catalogue of the Rhopalocera of Australia. Memoirs of the New
South Wales Naturalists’ Club No. 1.
WATERHOUSE, G.A. 1932. What butterfly is that? Angus and Robertson, Sydney; x + 291 pp.
WATERHOUSE, G.A. and LYELL, G. 1914. The butterflies of Australia. Angus and Robertson,
Sydney; vi + 239 pp.
ZALUCKI, M.P. 1999. The lesser wanderer, Danaus chrysippus, with comparative notes on
Danaus plexippus (Nymphalidae: Danainae). Pp 173-189, in: Kitching, R.L., Scheermeyer, E.,
Jones, R.E. and Pierce, N.E. (eds), Biology of Australian butterflies. Monographs on Australian
Lepidoptera, Vol. 6. CSIRO publishing, Collingwood, Victoria; xvi + 395 pp.
Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1): 37-48 37
A NEW SPECIES AND NOMENCLATURAL CHANGES IN THE
SUBGENUS POLYRHACHIS (CYRTOMYRMA) FOREL
(HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE: FORMICINAE)
RUDOLF J. KOHOUT
Biodiversity Program, Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Old 4101
(Email: rudolf:kohout@qm.qld.gov.au)
Abstract
Polyrhachis dorowi sp. n., anew species of the subgenus Cyrtomyrma Forel from Cape York
Peninsula, Queensland, is described and illustrated. Polyrhachis busiris Fr. Smith, 1860, from
New Guinea, is removed from synonymy with P. rastellata (Latreille, 1802), redescribed and
reinstated as a valid species; a lectotype is also designated. Polyrhachis rastellata baduri
Donisthorpe, 1941, from Japen Island off the northwestern coast of Irian Jaya [= West Papua],
Indonesia, is considered a new synonym of P. euryala Fr. Smith, 1863. The occurrence of P.
debilis Emery in Australia, earlier considered doubtful, is now confirmed by specimens from
Melville Island, off the coast of the Northern Territory.
Introduction
During a recent examination of Cyrtomyrma Forel material from Cape York
Peninsula, Queensland, I come upon several colonies of an apparently
undescribed species. This species has a highly arched mesosoma and
somewhat resembles a number of recently described Australasian species,
notably Polyrhachis robsoni Kohout from Queensland and P. hybosa Kohout
and P. tuberosa Kohout from New Guinea (see Kohout 2006). However, the
new species differs from P. robsoni in having the pronotal shoulders widely
rounded, while they are toothed or angular in the latter. From P. hybosa and
P. tuberosa the new species differs by its generally smaller size and the form
of the mesosoma, which is shorter, more slender and steeply descends from
the summit towards the propodeal declivity. I consider that the characters
separating these taxa warrant the description of the above specimens from
Cape York Peninsula as a new species.
On a recent visit to the Oxford University Museum of Natural History
(OXUM), I located both syntypes of P. busiris Fr. Smith listed by Smith
(1860: 98) in his original description of the species. The specimens were
placed in the Museum’s general collection, not with the other type material of
species collected by Alfred Russell Wallace and described by Frederick
Smith. This is probably why the syntypes of P. busiris remained virtually
unknown and were apparently missed by later researchers.
Publication dates and the spelling of species epithets and authors’ names
follow Bolton (1995) and Dorow (1995). Original collecting localities were
checked against the Bishop Museum’s unpublished list of New Guinea
localities, produced in 1966. In some cases the latitude and longitude co-
ordinates are only roughly approximate. The use of the words ‘New Guinea’
or ‘Moluccas’ alone indicates the delimitation of these regions in a
biogeographical sense, regardless of current political boundaries.
38 Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1)
Methods
Photographs of the specimens were taken with a digital camera attached to a
stereomicroscope and processed using Auto-Montage (Syncroscopy, Division
of Synoptics Ltd, USA) and Adobe Photoshop CS2 (Adobe Systems Inc,
USA). All digital images depict the primary types.
Standard Measurements and Indices: TL = Total length (the necessarily
composite measurement of the outstretched length of the entire ant measured
in profile); HL = Head length (the maximum measurable length of the head
in perfect full face view, measured from the anterior-most point ofthe clypeal
border or teeth, to the posterior-most point of the preoccipital margin); HW =
Head width (width of the head in perfect full face view, measured
immediately in front of the eyes); CI = Cephalic index (HW x 100/HL); SL =
Scape length (excluding the condyle); SI = Scape index (SL x 100/HW); PW
= Pronotal width (maximum width of the pronotal dorsum excluding the
spines); MTL = Metathoracic tibial length (maximum measurable length of
the tibia of the hind leg). Measurements were taken using a Zeiss SR
stereomicroscope at 32x magnification with an eyepiece graticule calibrated
against a stage micrometer. All measurements are in millimetres (mm).
Abbreviations used for specimen data are: acc. = accession; for. = forest; q =
queen; R. = River; RJK = R.J. Kohout; rf. = rainforest; w = worker/s; WHOD
= Wolfgang H.O. Dorow.
Abbreviations used for Institutions (with names of cooperating curators) are:
AMNH - American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, USA (Dr
J.M. Carpenter); ANIC — Australian National Insect Collection, CSIRO
Entomology, Canberra, ACT, Australia (Drs S.O. Shattuck, R.W. Taylor);
BMNH - The Natural History Museum, London, UK (Dr Barry Bolton, K.
Goodger); BPBM - Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, HI, USA (K.T.
Arakaki); CASC — California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA, USA
(Dr B.L. Fisher); JWGU - Johan Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am
Main, Germany (Prof. Dr U. Maschwitz); MCZC — Museum of Comparative
Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA (Dr S.P. Cover);
MHNG — Museum d’Histoire Naturelle, Geneva, Switzerland (Drs C.
Besuchet, I. Löbl, B. Merz); MNHA — Museum of Nature and Human
Activities, Sanda, Hyogo, Japan (Dr Yoshiaki Hashimoto); MNHU —
Museum fiir Naturkunde, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin, Germany (Dr F.
Koch); NHMW - Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna, Austria (Drs M.
Fisher, S. Schödl, H. Zettel); NMNH — National Museum of Natural History,
Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA (Dr T.R. Schultz); OXUM —
Hope Entomological Collections, University Museum, Oxford, UK (Dr D.J.
Mann); QMBA — Queensland Museum, Brisbane, Qld, Australia (Drs C.J.
Burwell, G.B. Monteith); SMFG — Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg,
Frankfurt am Main, Germany (Dr W.H.O. Dorow); SNSD — Staatliche
Naturhistorische Sammlungen, Museum fiir Tierkunde, Dresden, Germany
Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1) 39
(Drs R. Emmrich, U. Kallweit); TERC — Tropical Ecosystems Research
Centre, CSIRO, Darwin, NT, Australia (Dr A.N. Andersen).
Systematics
Polyrhachis dorowi sp. n.
(Figs 1, 4-5)
Types. Holotype worker, AUSTRALIA (QUEENSLAND): Cape York Peninsula,
Lockerbie Scrub, 10°46’S, 142°29’E, 23-26.ix.2003, lowland f., ex nest between
leaves, W.H.O. Dorow (RJK acc. 03.10). Paratypes: 55 workers, same data as
holotype; 29 workers, 5 99, 9 0'0’, same data as holotype except 19-23.111.1987 (RJK
accs 87.36, 37, 44, 51, 66, 68). Holotype (QMT 152066) and most paratypes in
QMBA; 3 paratype workers and paratype ? in ANIC; 2 paratype workers each in
BMNH, CASC, MCZC, MHNG, MNHU, NHMW, NMNH and SMEG.
Additional material examined. AUSTRALIA (QUEENSLAND): Cape York
Peninsula, Bamaga, 10°53’S, 142°23’E, 26.ix.2003, riparian rf., (RJK acc. 03.19) (w).
Description. Worker. Dimensions (holotype cited first): TL c. 6.00, 5.14-
6.25; HL 1.53, 1.34-1.56; HW 1.50, 1.22-1.53; CI 98, 91-98; SL 1.87, 1.65-
1.93; SI 125, 124-135; PW 1.18, 1.03-1.25; MTL 2.15, 1.84-2.18 (24
measured). Mandibles with five teeth. Anterior clypeal margin with truncate,
medially notched central flange, laterally flanked by acute denticles. Clypeus
in profile straight or very weakly convex, posteriorly rounding into
moderately impressed basal margin. Frontal triangle weakly indicated.
Frontal carinae sinuate with margins moderately raised at mid-length, rather
flat anteriorly and posteriorly; central area with moderately impressed frontal
furrow. Sides of head in front of eyes weakly convex towards mandibular
bases; behind eyes rounding into moderately convex occipital margin. Eyes
relatively large, convex, in full-face view clearly breaking lateral cephalic
outline. Ocelli lacking. Pronotum in lateral view with anterior face rising very
steeply towards narrow summit situated in front of strongly impressed
promesonotal suture. Pronotal humeri in dorsal view rounded with greatest
width of pronotum just before mid-length of segment. Mesosomal dorsum
steeply descending towards propodeal declivity; metanotal groove lacking.
Petiole relatively low, virtually triangular in lateral view with anterior and
posterior faces weakly convex; dorsal margin armed with four spines, dorsal
pair short, close together and broad-based, lateral pair diverging, slender and
more acute. Subpetiolar process acute anteriorly, narrowly rounded
posteriorly. Anterior face of first gastral segment about as high as full height
of petiole, widely rounding onto dorsum of gaster.
Mandibles very finely, longitudinally striate with numerous piliferous pits.
Dorsum of head, mesosoma and gaster finely shagreened. Intensity of
mesosomal sculpturation distinctly increasing laterally with lower portions of
pronotum, meso- and metapleurae rather strongly reticulate-rugose. Petiole
mostly transversely wrinkled dorsally, becoming reticulate-rugose near base.
40 Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1)
Mandibular masticatory borders with numerous curved hairs. Anterior
clypeal margin medially with a few golden setae and several shorter setae
fringing margin laterally. A few pairs of longer hairs arising near anterior and
basal clypeal margins, along frontal carinae, on vertex and anterior face of
frontal coxae. Tuft of long, variously curved hairs, not exceeding greatest
diameter of eye in length, situated on summit of mesonotum. Numerous,
distinctly shorter hairs arising along margins of segments and around apex of
gaster.
Black; mandibular teeth, extreme tip of apical antennal segment and most of
legs reddish-brown; proximal part oftibiae and tarsi black.
Queen. Dimensions: TL c. 7.51-8.01; HL 1.72-1.81; HW 1.53-1.64; CI 88-
91; SL 2.00-2.12; SI 122-133; PW 1.68-1.84; MTL 2.37-2.59 (5 measured).
Closely resembling worker and apart of sexual characters differing as
follows: eyes only moderately convex, in full face view just breaking lateral
cephalic outline; pronotal humeri subangular; mesoscutum in dorsal view
wider than long with lateral margins converging anteriorly into broadly
rounded anterior margin; median line bifurcate dorsally. In lateral view
mesoscutum relatively high with anterior margin widely rounding onto flat
dorsum; parapsides rather flat anteriorly, weakly raised posteriorly;
mesoscutellum in profile weakly convex, moderately elevated above dorsum
of mesosoma; metanotal groove distinct; propodeum with rudimentary
tubercles; propodeal dorsum convex in profile evenly descending into vertical
declivity. Body sculpturation, pilosity and colour as in worker.
Males and immature stages (eggs, larvae and pupae) deposited in the QMBA
spirit collection.
Etymology. After the collector of the type series, Dr Wolfgang H.O. Dorow
of the Senckenberg Institute, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Remarks. Polyrhachis dorowi is characterised by the highly arched
mesosoma and steeply rising anterior face of pronotal dorsum with its summit
just before the promesonotal suture. It can be identified by the following
modification to the key to Australian species in Kohout (2006). Figure
numbers in square brackets refer to illustrations in the original article
(Kohout 2006).
15 Antennal scapes longer (SI >140); lateral petiolar spines longer than
dorsal pair (Fig. 8) (Indonesia, New Guinea) ...... (P. euryala Fr. Smith)
— Antennal scapes shorter (SI <135); lateral and dorsal petiolar spines
subequaliin length teas sseretee sche en EDER 16
16 Pronotum in dorsal view strongly transverse, humeri bluntly angular or
narrowly rounded; petiole with sides only weakly diverging dorsally
(mid- to southern Queensland) [Fig. 4 C-D] ..... P. mackayi Donisthorpe
Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1) 41
Figs 1-9. Polyrhachis dorowi sp. n., holotype worker: (1) head in full-face view; (4)
dorsal view; (5) lateral view. Polyrhachis busiris Fr. Smith, lectotype worker: (2)
head in full-face view; (6) dorsal view; (7) lateral view. Polyrhachis euryala Fr.
Smith, syntype worker: (3) head in full-face view; (8) dorsal view; (9) lateral view.
42 Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1)
— Pronotum in dorsal view only weakly transverse, humeri widely
rounded; petiole with sides more strongly diverging dorsally (far
northerm@ueens land) pases eee ees eee T
17 Mesosoma in lateral view more-or-less evenly rounded with very steep,
almost vertical propodeal declivity [Fig. 2 A, D-E] ... P. delecta Kohout
— Mesosoma in lateral view highly arched with anterior face of pronotum
steeply rising towards narrow summit; mesonotal and propodeal dorsa
steeply descending posteriorly towards oblique declivity (Fig. 5) .........
Sn P. dorowi sp. n.
Polyrhachis busiris Fr. Smith, 1860, stat. rev.
(Figs 2, 6-7)
Polyrhachis busiris Fr. Smith, 1860: 98, pl. 1, fig. 15. Syntype workers (2). Original
localities: NEW GUINEA, Dory (= IRIAN JAYA, Manokwari) (A.R. Wallace);
INDONESIA, Batjan I. (A.R. Wallace), OXUM (examined).
Polyrhachis busiris Fr. Smith; Mayr, 1862: 688. Junior synonym of rastellata
(Latreille, 1802).
Additional material examined. INDONESIA (IRIAN JAYA [= WEST PAPUA]):
Baitenissa, Gesa R., 02.09°S, 137.43°E, ~20 m, 6-12.v.2007, lowland swamp for., ex
carton nest on tree trunk (R.R. Snelling # 07-052) (w).
Lectotype designation. Both syntypes of P. busiris are card mounted and in
relatively good condition. In addition to BMNH blue disc ‘Syntype’ tags,
they are both furnished with Hope Department, Oxford labels inscribed
‘Polyrachis (sic) busiris Smith’, one with 1179'/, and the other with 1179 7/5.
The latter specimen also bears a round, white disc inscribed ‘Dor.’ (= Dory)
and an apparently original, handwritten label inscribed ‘Polyrhachis Busiris
Smith’. Its petiole matches the figure given in the original article (Smith
1860: pl. 1, fig. 15) and, in order to maintain nomenclatural stability and
preserve current usage, this specimen is here designated the lectotype of P.
busiris Fr. Smith. The other specimen, which bears a round disc inscribed
‘Bac.’ (= Bachian; = Batjan I.), is deemed a paralectotype. This is the
specimen that was apparently examined by Donisthorpe and furnished with
two additional labels referring to the citation of this species in his paper on
Smith’s types (Donisthorpe 1932: 460). However, closer examination reveals
that the paralectotype is not conspecific with the lectotype. It clearly
represents a different species that is very similar to Polyrhachis fornicata
Emery (see Kohout 2008) and most likely represents a Moluccan population
of that species.
Redescription. Worker: Dimensions (lectotype cited first): TL c. 6.80, 6.40-
7.06; HL 1.78, 1.65-1.78; HW 1.84, 1.62-1.84; CI 103, 96-103; SL 2.15,
2.00-2.15; SI 117, 117-123; PW 1.43, 1.31-1.43; MTL 2.59, 2.43-2.62 (19
measured).
Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1) 43
Head, excluding mandibles, about as long as wide. Mandibles with five teeth,
apical tooth largest with subsequent teeth reducing in length towards base.
Anterior clypeal margin with central truncate flange, shallowly notched
medially and flanked laterally by acute denticles. Clypeus in profile weakly
convex with basal margin moderately impressed. Frontal triangle poorly
indicated. Frontal carinae sinuate with only weakly raised margins; frontal
furrow shallowly impressed. Sides of head in front of eyes strongly
converging towards mandibular bases; behind eyes widely rounding into
weakly convex occipital margin. Eyes moderately convex; in full face view
not or just touching lateral cephalic outline. Ocelli lacking. Pronotum in
dorsal view distinctly transverse with humeri angular or toothed. Mesosoma
in profile more-or-less evenly convex; promesonotal suture distinct,
metanotal groove lacking. Propodeum armed with distinct tuberculae or short
teeth; declivity oblique. Petiole with anterior face straight, posterior face
convex; dorsum armed with four, subequal, acute spines. Anterior face of
first gastral segment lower than full height of petiole, widely rounding onto
dorsum of segment.
Mandibles very finely and closely, mostly longitudinally, striate. Head,
mesosoma and gaster finely shagreened. Intensity of sculpturation increasing
laterally with sides of mesosoma distinctly reticulate and meso- and
metapleurae rather strongly reticulate-rugose. Petiole finely, mostly
transversely, reticulate dorsally, becoming reticulate-rugose around base.
Mandibles with numerous straight or weakly curved golden hairs arising near
masticatory borders and numerous very short appressed hairs towards
mandibular bases. Anterior clypeal margin with a few long, anteriorly
directed, golden setae and several short setae fringing margin laterally. A few
pairs of medium length, erect hairs arising near anterior and basal clypeal
margins, along frontal carinae and on vertex. Several medium to long, mostly
erect or somewhat curved hairs on front coxae, ventral surfaces of trochanters
and apical segments of gaster. Tuft.of a few semierect hairs on summit of
mesonotum, with longest hairs reaching about half of greatest diameter of eye
in length. Very short, closely appressed pubescence in various densities over
most body surfaces.
Black throughout; joints of trochanters and femora and distal half of tibiae in
modern specimens medium to dark reddish-brown.
Sexuals and immature stages unknown.
Remarks. Mayr (1862) considered Polyrhachis busiris to be a synonym of P.
rastellata and his opinion was accepted by all subsequent authors, including
Roger (1863), Dalla Torre (1893), Emery (1925), Donisthorpe (1932) and,
more recently, Than (1978), Dorow (1995) and Bolton (1995). I examined
and compared both P. busiris types with specimens interpreted earlier as P.
rastellata (see Kohout 2006: 115) and believe that Mayr suggested this
44 Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1)
synonymy without seeing the actual specimens. I consider his action to be
incorrect and am confident in reinstating P. busiris to full specific status.
Polyrhachis busiris is similar to a number of New Guinean species that also
feature distinctly angular or toothed pronotal humeri and a propodeal dorsum
armed with spines, teeth or tuberculae. It can be distinguished by using the
following key in addition to that in Kohout (2006).
1 Pronotal humeri in dorsal view produced into prominent teeth or bilobed
— Pronotal humeri distinctly angular or narrowly rounded .................. 3
2 Propodeal spines long, dorsoventrally compressed, widely diverging and
bluntlyterminated/(ArullS) passe een en nnn P. levior Roger
— Propodeal spines very short, strongly upturned and acute ..................
P. albertisi Emery
3 Propodeum armed with a pair of distinct spines .............00..ce000eee0e 4
— Propodeum armed with a pair of more-or-less distinct tuberculae .........
P. busiris Fr. Smith
4 Propodeal spines long, dorsoventrally compressed, widely diverging and
bluntly terminated; lateral petiolar spines distinctly elongated .........
ha cae Gc IO RE eS N ENE E P. barryi Kohout
— Propodeal spines short, acute, strongly upturned; petiolar spines more-or-
lessisubequal iA ra eects eee) E eee N 5
5 Larger species (HL > 1.68); anterior face of pronotal dorsum in profile
strongly convex; pronotal humeri narrowly rounded ............6.eeee+.
Onn Ora a OOT TN EA NEE ID iphone hacen sere P. linae Donisthorpe
— Smaller species (HL < 1.56); pronotal dorsum in profile only weakly
convex towards distinctly impressed promesonotal suture; pronotal
humeri distinctly angular n a P. mondoi Donisthorpe
Polyrhachis euryala Fr. Smith, 1863
(Figs 3, 8-9)
Polyrhachis euryalus Fr. Smith, 1863: 17. Syntype workers. Type locality:
INDONESIA, Misool I. (A.R. Wallace), OXUM, BMNH (examined).
Polyrhachis euryalus Fr. Smith; Mayr, 1872: 138. Junior synonym of P. rastellata
(Latreille, 1802).
Polyrhachis rastellata var. euryalus Fr. Smith; Emery, 1900: 720. Revived from
synonymy as a variety of P. rastellata (Latreille, 1802).
Polyrhachis rastellata var. torricelliana Viehmeyer, 1912: 9, fig. 11. Syntype
workers. Type locality: NEW GUINEA, Torricelli Mts (‘Kais. Wilhelmsland,
Toricelli Gebirge’ on data label) (Schlaginhaufen), SNSD (examined).
Synonymy by Viehmeyer, 1914: 50.
Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1) 45
Polyrhachis (Cyrtomyrma) rastellata ssp. euryalus Fr. Smith; Emery, 1925: 208.
Subspecies of P. rastellata (Latreille, 1802) and combination in P.
(Cyrtomyrma).
Polyrhachis (Cyrtomyrma) euryalus Fr. Smith; Donisthorpe, 1938: 259. Revived
status as species.
Polyrhachis (Cyrtomyrma) rastellata var. baduri Donisthorpe, 1941: 63. Syntype
workers, queen. Type locality: NEW GUINEA (‘Dutch New Guinea’ on data
label), Japen I., Mt Baduri, 1,000 ft. viii.1938 (L.E. Cheesman B.M. 1938-593),
BMNH, CASC, MCZC, QMBA (examined). Syn. n.
Additional material examined. INDONESIA (IRIAN JAYA [= WEST PAPUA)):
Waris, S of Hollandia, 450-500 m, 1-7.viii.1959 (T.C. Maa) (w). PAPUA NEW
GUINEA: 2 km E of Maprik, 03°38’S, 143°04’E, 200 m, 10.11.1989 (P.S. Ward #
10165-8) (w); 1-2 km S of Pes Mission, c. 12 km WSW of Aitape, 03°11’S,
142°15°E, <50 m, 31.vii-3.vili.1984 (RJK acc. 84.172) (w, 9).
Dimensions of euryala syntypes: TL c. 6.25-7.00; HL 1.53-1.56; HW 1.43;
CI 92-93; SL 2.03-2.06; SI 142-144; PW 1.15; MTL 2.50 (2 measured).
Dimensions of rastellata baduri syntypes: TL c. 6.20-6.55; HL 1.59-1.65;
HW 1.56-1.59; CI 94-100; SL 2.15-2.18; SI 135-140; PW 1.18-1.22; MTL
2.59-2.68 (2 measured).
Dimensions of rastellata torricelliana syntypes: TL c. 5.14-6.00; HL 1.43-
1.50; HW 1.31-1.43; CI 92-95; SL 1.81-1.96, SI 137-138; PW 1.11-1.22;
MTL 2.03-2.34 (2 measured).
Remarks. I have examined two syntypes each of P. euryala (OXUM,
BMNH), P. rastellata torricelliana (SNSD) and P. rastellata baduri
(BMNH, MCZC) and consider that they represent only different populations
of a single species. All three taxa are characterised by widely rounded
shoulders with the pronotal dorsum widest at around its mid-length. They
differ somewhat in the outline of the petiole, with the lateral spines in P.
euryala being more acute and longer than the dorsal pair, while in P.
rastellata torricelliana and P. rastellata baduri the petiolar spines are more-
or-less subequal and the lateral pair less divergent. However, examination of
the additional material listed above reveals some variability in the length of
the petiolar spines between different populations and I am confident that all
three names represent a single biological species. Kohout (2006: 98) noted
that P. euryala closely resembled P. delecta Kohout from Australia, sharing a
distinctly slender mesosoma with widely rounded shoulders. However, they
differ in the length of the antennal scapes, which are markedly shorter in P.
delecta (SL 119-129) compared with those in P. euryala (SL 137-144).
Polyrhachis rastellata baduri was erroneously omitted from my recent
review of the New Guinean Cyrtomyrma species (Kohout 2006).
One of the three available syntypes of P. rastellata torricelliana is in fact a
specimen of P. wagneri Viehmeyer, 1914; it closely matches most of the
available syntypes (MNHU) of that species. Although Viehmeyer (1914)
46 Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1)
listed only one specimen in the original description of P. wagneri, there are
actually four available specimens labelled as types. However, on closer
examination, one of the four also represents a second species and matches the
types of P. rastellata torricelliana. Because Viehmeyer (1914) described P.
wagneri in the same paper in which he synonymised P. rastellata
torricelliana with P. euryala, | believe it is possible that some specimens of
both species were accidentally mixed and mislabelled during their
examination. Polyrhachis wagneri and P. rastellata torricelliana are very
similar, with both featuring distinctly rounded pronotal shoulders. They differ
in size (HL 1.65-1.68 in P. wagneri versus HL 1.43-1.50 in P. rastellata
torricelliana) and in the shape of the petiole, which is exceptionally broad
and with widely diverging lateral spines in P. wagneri. The propodeal
dorsum in P. wagneri also bears a pair of very short, tooth-like spines or
tubercles that are completely absent in P. rastellata torricelliana.
A newly confirmed Australian record
In my paper on the Polyrhachis and Echinopla ants of Queensland’s Wet
Tropics (Kohout 2000), I suggested that P. debilis Emery occurred in
Australia. However, further study of the Queensland specimens originally
thought to belong to that species confirmed their identity as P. yorkana Forel
(Kohout 2006: 91). In the latter paper I also noted specimens similar to P.
debilis that originated from Melville Island off the coast of the Northern
Territory. As only a few specimens were available at that time and their
relationship with P. debilis was inconclusive, they were considered to
probably represent a new species. However, recent collecting on Melville
Island by Dr Alan N. Andersen (TERC) produced sufficient material to allow
a more detailed comparison with several available syntypes of P. debilis.
Apart from some rather trivial differences, the two groups of specimens are
very similar and, as a result, I consider the Melville Island specimens to
represent an isolated population of P. debilis.
Acknowledgements
I am very grateful to Prof. U. Maschwitz (JWGU) for the opportunity to join
a field trip to Cape York Peninsula, financed by the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft, and to Dr Wolfgang H.O. Dorow (SMFG) for
making available the specimens he collected. I also thank Dr Alan N.
Andersen (TERC) for providing recently collected Cyrtomyrma specimens
from Melville Island. This work was generously supported by three Ernst
Mayr Grants that allowed me to visit and study the Polyrhachis ants at the
University Museum, Oxford and other institutions in the U.K. and U.S.A. My
special thanks are due to Natalie Barnett (ANIC) for providing the digital
images for the illustrations. I would also like to extend my thanks to the
Injinoo Land Council, Cape York, for a permit to conduct fieldwork on the
land of their traditional ownership. Finally, I would like to thank Dr Chris
Burwell (QMBA) for reading and commenting on a draft manuscript.
Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1) 47
References
BOLTON, B. 1995. A new general catalogue of the ants of the world. Harvard University Press,
Cambridge, MA; 504 pp.
DALLA TORRE, C.G. de 1893. Catalogus Hymenopterorum, hucusque descriptorum
systematicus et synonymicus. Vol. 7. Lipsiae; 289 pp.
DONISTHORPE, H. 1932. On the identity of Smith’s types of Formicidae (Hymenoptera)
collected by Alfred Russell Wallace in the Malay Archipelago, with description of two new
species. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (10) 10: 441-476.
DONISTHORPE, H. 1938. The subgenus Cyrtomyrma Forel of Polyrhachis Smith, with
descriptions of new species, etc. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (11) 1: 246-267.
DONISTHORPE, H. 1941. Descriptions of new ants (Hym., Formicidae) from various localities.
Annals and Magazine of Natural History (11) 8: 199-210.
DOROW, W.H.O. 1995. Revision of the ant genus Polyrhachis Smith, 1857 (Hymenoptera:
Formicidae: Formicinae) on subgeneric level with keys, checklist of species and bibliography.
Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 185: 1-113.
EMERY, C. 1900. Formiche raccolte da Elio Modigliani in Sumatra, Endago e Mentawei.
Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Genova (2) 20(40): 661-722.
EMERY, C. 1925. Hymenoptera, Fam. Formicidae, subfam. Formicinae. In: Wytsman, P. (ed.),
Genera Insectorum. Fasc. 183. Bruxelles.
FOREL, A. 1915. Results of Dr. E. Mjöberg’s Swedish scientific expeditions to Australia, 1910-
1913. 2. Ameisen. Arkiv för Zoologi 916): 1-119.
KOHOUT, R.J. 2006. Review of Polyrhachis (Cyrtomyrma) Forel (Hymenoptera: Formicidae:
Formicinae) of Australia, Borneo, New Guinea and Solomon Islands with descriptions of new
species. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 52(1): 87-146.
KOHOUT, R.J. 2008. A review of the Polyrhachis ants of Sulawesi with keys and descriptions
of new species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Formicinae). Memoirs of the Queensland Museum
52(2): 255-317.
LATREILLE, P.A. 1802. Histoire Naturelle des Fourmis, et recueil de mémoires et
d'observations sur les abeilles, les araignées, les faucheurs, et autres insectes. Paris; 445 pp.
MAYR, G. 1862. Myrmecologische Studien. Verhandlungen der k. k. Zoologisch-Botanischen
Gesellschaft in Wien 12: 649-776.
MAYR, G. 1872. Formicidae Borneenses collectae a J. Doria et O. Beccari in territorio Sarawak
annis 1865-1867. Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Genova 2: 133-155.
ROGER, J. 1863. Verzeichniss der Formiciden-Gattungen und Arten. Berliner Entomologische
Zeitschrift 7 (Beilage): 1-65.
SMITH, F. 1860. Catalogue of hymenopterous insects collected by Mr. A.R. Wallace in the
Islands of Bachian, Kaisaa, Amboyna, Gilolo, and at Dory in New Guinea. Journal of the
Proceedings of the Linnean Society, Zoology 5 (Supplement to volume 4): 93-143.
SMITH, F. 1863. Catalogue of hymenopterous insects collected by Mr. A.R. Wallace in the
Islands of Mysol, Ceram, Waigiou, Bouru and Timor. Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean
Society, Zoology 7: 6-48.
THAN, K. 1978. A taxonomic revision of the subgenus Cyrtomyrma Forel of the genus
Polyrhachis F. Smith (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Formicinae). Unpubl. PhD thesis, University
of London, London.
48 Australian Entomologist, 2009, 36 (1)
VIEHMEYER, H. 1912. Ameisen aus Deutsch Neuguinea gesammelt von Dr. O.
Schlaginhaufen. Nebst einem Verzeichnisse der papuanischen Arten. Abhandlungen und
Berichte des Königlichen Zoologischen und Anthropologisch-Ethnographischen Museums zu
Dresden 14: 1-26.
VIEHMEYER, H. 1914. Neue und unvollständig bekannte Ameisen der alten Welt. Archiv für
Naturgeschichte 79 (A12) (1913): 24-60.
ENTOMOLOGICAL NOTICES
Items for insertion should be sent to the editor who reserves the right to alter,
reject or charge for notices.
NOTES FOR AUTHORS
Manuscripts submitted for publication can either be submitted as hardcopies
or electronically. Three copies (double spaced text and illustrations) of
hardcopy manuscripts should be submitted. Manuscripts submitted in digital
format should be sent in Microsoft Word. Digital illustrations should be sent
initially as low resolution images in a separate Word file, as low resolution
JPEGs, or as low resolution PDF files, with figure numbers indicated clearly
for each figure. Digital manuscripts may be sent via email to
susan.wrieht@qm.qld.sov.au. Hardcopy manuscripts and digital manuscripts
on floppy disk or CD-ROM should be sent to:
The Editor
The Australian Entomologist
BO: Box 537;
Indooroopilly, Qld, 4068
Authors should refer to recent issues for layout and style. All papers will be
forwarded to two referees and the editor reserves the right to reject any paper
considered unsuitable.
It is Magazine editorial policy that usage of taxonomic nomenclature will
comply with the mandatory provisions of the International Code of
Zoological Nomenclature.
Papers longer than ten printed pages will normally not be accepted.
Publication costs are as follows: cost per printed page, or part thereof, $20
(black & white) and $50 (colour). These costs include the supply of 50 free
reprints to the senior author. Papers occupying one printed page or less may
be accepted without charge if no reprints are required. Reprints may be
supplied for one page papers at the normal cost, by arrangement. Page
charges may be reduced at the discretion of the Publications Committee. An
application for reduction must be made, with reasons, at the time of
acceptance of the manuscript.
Printed by ColourWise Reproductions, 300 Ann Street, Brisbane, 4000.
THE AUSTRALIAN
Entomologist
Volume 36, Part 1,7 March 2009
CONTENTS
BRITTON, D.R. AND COUPER, J.
A larval food plant for Atteva albiguttata (Zeller) (Lepidoptera:
Yponomeutidae: Attevinae).
HANCOCK, D.L.
Relationships of the swallowtail 'genera' Agehana Matsumura, Chilasa
Moore and Z/eppone Hancock (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae).
KITCHIN, D.R.
Notes on the biology of Merimna atrata (Gory & Laporte) (Coleoptera:
Buprestidae).
———— a on ern
KOHOUT, RJ.
A new species and nomenclatural changes in the subgenus Polyrhachis
(Cyrtomyrma) Forel (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Formicinae). 37
ET EA Se ee ee
LAMBKIN, T.A.
A record of Danaus chrysippus cratippus (C. Felder) (Lepidoptera:
Nymphalidae: Danainae) from Thursday Island, Torres Strait.
MOORE, A.S. AND GINN, S.G.
New records of butterflies (Lepidoptera) from the Port Macquarie area,
New South Wales.
PORCH, N.
The first record of an amycterine weevil (Coleptera: Curculionidae:
Amycterinae) feeding on Orchidaceae.
SANDS, M.C.
A new geographical record for Anisynta cynone (Hewitson) (Lepidoptera:
Hesperiidae: Trapezitinae).
SHAKESPEARE, T.J., SHAKESPEARE, Z.J. AND SHAKESPEARE, T.P.
Range extensions for two species of Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera) to Coffs
Harbour, New South Wales.
TAKAMI, Y. AND WEIR, T.A.
The genus Pamborus Latreille (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in the Sloane
Collection and its importance for current taxonomy.
ae
4
ISSN 1320 6133 ZLEE TON