Volume 42, Part 3, 21 September 2015
Price: $8.00 per part
ISSN 1320 6133
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3): 105-106 105
TWO NEW RECORDS OF AUSTRALIAN TRIATOMA LAPORTE
(HEMIPTERA: REDUVHUDAE: TRIATOMINAE)
G.B. MONTEITH
Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane. Old 4101
Abstract
Two additional specimens of Triatoma leopoldi (Schouteden, 1933) are recorded from Australia
together with photographs of a living specimen.
Introduction
Monteith (1974) recorded three males of Triatoma novaeguineae Miller,
1958 taken at mercury vapour light on the banks of the East Claudie River
(12.714°S, 143.287°E), Iron Range area (now within Kutini-Payamu NP) in
Cape York Peninsula, that being the first record of this medically important
group of blood-feeding insects from Australia.
Me T e
K Je "è iòs z ait te P
Figs 1-2. Living male of Triatoma leopoldi (Schouteden) collected at East Claudie
River in December 2010: (1) dorsal view; (2) lateral view showing rostrum — R.
(Photographs by Eric Vanderduys).
106 Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
Monteith (1974) also suggested that the species may be a junior synonym of
Triatoma leopoldi (Schouteden, 1933) and this was implemented in the world
revision of the subfamily by Lent and Wygodzinsky (1979). Outside
Australia, the species is known from the islands of New Guinea, Biak and
Sulawesi (Lent and Wygodzinsky 1979, Maldonado Capriles 1990). All
Triatominae are vertebrate blood feeders (Lent and Wygodzinsky 1979, Justi
et al. 2014) and the listing of the species as ‘arthropod-feeder, predator’ by
Cassis and Gross (1995) is a lapsus.
A recent review of the potential for transmission of Chagas’ disease (caused
by the parasitic protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi Chagas) in Australia (Jackson
et al. 2014) estimated 1,928 infected residents in 2011 and noted the presence
of T. leopoldi as a potential Australian vector.
New records
Two more male specimens have been collected at MV light in the Iron Range
area, both lodged in the Queensland Museum, as follows: East Claudie River,
12.714°S, 143.287°E, 8-16.x11.2010, Monteith & Escalona; West Claudie
River, 12.739°S, 143.256°E, 28.x1.1986, G. Daniels & M. Schneider. The
West Claudie River locality is 4 km SW of the East Claudie locality. Both are
in lowland rainforest. Females have yet to be collected in Australia. The 2010
specimen was photographed alive by Eric Vanderduys and these are
reproduced with thanks to enable collectors to recognise this important
species (Figs 1-2). The distinctive colour and straight rostrum held close to
the underside of the head (Fig. 2) allows separation from other Australian
assassin bugs which have the rostrum curved away from the head underside.
Males are 19-20 mm in length. Overseas, females reach 23 mm.
References
CASSIS, G. and GROSS, G.F. 1995. Hemiptera: Heteroptera (Coleorrhyncha to Cimicomorpha).
In: Houston, W.W.K. and Maynard, G.V. (eds), Zoological Catalogue of Australia. Volume
27.3A. CSIRO, Melbourne; 501 pp.
JACKSON, Y., PINTO, A. and PETT, S. 2014. Chagas’ disease in Australia and New Zealand:
risks and need for public health interventions. Tropical Medicine and International Health 19(2):
212-218.
JUSTI, S.A., RUSSO, C.A.M., MALLET, J.R. dos S., OBARA, M.T. and GALVÃO, C. 2014.
Molecular phylogeny of Triatomini (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae). Parasites & Vectors
7(149): 12 pp. Published online — doi:10.1186/1756-3305-7-149.
LENT, H. and WYGODZINSKY, P. 1979. Revision of the Triatominae (Hemiptera, Reduviidae)
and their significance as vectors of Chagas’ disease. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural
History 163: 125-520.
MALDONADO CAPRILES, J. 1990. Systematic catalogue of the Reduviidae of the world
(Insecta: Heteroptera). University of Puerto Rico, Puerto Rico; 694 pp.
MONTEITH, G.B. 1974. Confirmation of the presence of Triatominae (Hemiptera: Reduviidae)
in Australia, with notes on Indo-Pacific species. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society
13: 89-94.
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3): 107-126 107
A REVIEW OF THE TREE, FIG AND FRUIT-INFESTING FLIES
OF THE AETHIOTHEMARA, DIARRHEGMA, DIRIOXA AND
THEMAROIDES GROUPS OF GENERA (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE:
ACANTHONEVRINI)
DAVID L. HANCOCK
8/3 McPherson Close, Edge Hill, Cairns, Old 4870
Abstract
Indo-Australian, East Asian and African fruit flies placed in the Aethiothemara, Diarrhegma,
Dirioxa and Themaroides groups of genera and known or believed to breed in figs, overripe and
damaged fruit or beneath the bark of standing trees are reviewed. The 134 recognised species are
referred to 39 genera: Aethiothemara Hendel, Afrocneros Bezzi, Labeschatia Munro, Ocnerioxa
Speiser, Ptiloniola Hendel and Themarictera Hendel in the Aethiothemara group; Diarrhegma
Bezzi in the Diarrhegma group; Anchiacanthonevra Hardy, Dirioxa Hendel, Griphomyia Hardy,
Lumirioxa Permkam & Hancock, Micronevrina Permkam & Hancock, Mimoeuphranta Hardy
and Parachlaena Hering in the Dirioxa group; and Acanthonevroides Permkam & Hancock,
Alloeomyia Hardy, Aridonevra Permkam & Hancock, Buloloa Hardy, Cheesmanomyia Malloch,
Clusiosoma Malloch, Clusiosomina Malloch, Enoplopteron de Meijere, Hemiclusiosoma Hardy,
Hexaresta Hering, Neothemara Malloch, Nothoclusiosoma Hardy, Paedohexacinia Hardy,
Pseudacanthoneura Malloch, Pseudoneothemara Hardy, Quasirhabdochaeta Hardy, Rabaulia
Malloch, Rabauliomorpha Hardy, Taeniorioxa Permkam & Hancock, Termitorioxa Hendel,
Themarohystrix Hendel, Themaroides Hendel, Themaroidopsis Hering, Trypanocentra Hendel
and Walkeraitia Hardy in the Themaroides group. Lyronotum Hering, 1941 is placed as a new
synonym of Hexaresta Hering, 1941 and its type species, Acanthoneura seriata de Meijere,
1915, is placed as a new synonym of Hexaresta multistriga (Walker, 1859). Clusiosoma
semifuscum Malloch, 1926 is returned to synonymy with C. minutum (de Meijere, 1913). Keys
are included to Asian and Australasian genera plus species of Aethiothemara, Diarrhegma,
Dirioxa, Termitorioxa and Themaroides and males of the Clusiosoma pullatum group.
Introduction
This is the fifth in a series of papers reviewing and keying Indo-Australian,
Oceanian and East Asian fruit flies placed in the tribe Acanthonevrini sensu
Korneyev (1999) of subfamily Phytalmitnae and deals with species referred
to the Diarrhegma, Dirioxa and Themaroides groups of genera, together with
the Afrotropical Aethiothemara group. Diarrhegma occurs from India and
China to Indonesia, while the Dirioxa and Themaroides groups are largely
restricted to the Australian and Oceanian Regions. Previous papers dealt with
the Acanthonevra, Sophira, Rioxa and Dacopsis complexes of the
Acanthonevra group (Hancock 2011, 2012, 2014a, 2014b).
The Afrotropical Aethiothemara group was reviewed and keyed by Hancock
(1986) and contains six genera: Aethiothemara Hendel, Afrocneros Bezzi,
Labeschatia Munro, Ocnerioxa Speiser, Ptiloniola Hendel and Themarictera
Hendel. Keys to the species of Afrocneros (3 spp), Ocnerioxa (11 spp) and
Ptiloniola (3 spp) were provided by Munro (1967), while Labeschatia and
Themarictera are monotypic (Hancock 1986). A provisional key to the six
species of Aethiothemara, based on that of Hendel (1928), is provided below.
Larvae of Afrocneros excellens (Loew), A. mundus (Loew) and Ocnerioxa
sinuata (Loew) feed on the parenchymatous tissue of standing Cussonia
108 Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
(Araliaceae) trunks (Munro 1967), while Themarictera flaveolata (Fabricius)
has been bred from fruit of Maerua cafra and ‘Capparis sp.’ (Capparaceae)
(Munro 1925, Hancock 2003).
For the Indo-Australian fauna, the Dirioxa group differs from the
Diarrhegma and Themaroides groups in having only a single apical spine on
the mid tibia rather than two. The Diarrhegma group contains only the genus
Diarrhegma Bezzi, with two species. Diarrhegma modestum (Fabricius) has
been reported from decaying wood (Bezzi 1913), including Moringa
pterygosperma (Moringaceae) (Hancock and Drew 1994b), and at least some
genera in the Dirioxa and Themaroides groups (e.g. Lumirioxa Permkam &
Hancock and Termitorioxa Hendel) are known to breed beneath the decaying
bark of standing trees (Permkam and Hancock 1995, Hancock 2002). Adults
of Acanthonevroides Permkam & Hancock, Lumirioxa and Micronevrina
Permkam & Hancock have been collected in Malaise traps baited with sawn
saplings (G.B. Monteith in Hancock 2013).
The Themaroides group is currently divided into three — the Clusiosoma
subgroup with nine genera, Neothemara subgroup with six genera and
Themaroides subgroup with ten genera (Hancock and Drew 2003). In the
Clusiosoma subgroup, larvae of Cheesmanomyia nigra (de Meijere),
Clusiosoma minutum (de Meijere) [as C. semifuscum Malloch], C. pleurale
Malloch, C. subpullatum Hardy, Clusiosomina puncticeps Malloch, Rabaulia
fascifacies Malloch, R. nigrotibia Hering and Trypanocentra_ nigrithorax
Malloch all feed in the fruit of figs (Ficus spp: Moraceae) (Hardy 1986,
Permkam and Hancock 1995, Hancock et al. 1998, Hancock et al. 2000,
Hancock and Drew 2003). In the Themaroides subgroup, larvae of
Termitorioxa termitoxena (Bezzi) feed beneath damaged bark of trees such as
Terminalia sp. (Combretaceae) and Delonix regia (Fabaceae); an initial
record from galleries of Mastotermes darwiniensis Froggatt (Bezzi 1919) is
believed to indicate feeding on the tree trunk rather than feeding on the
termites (Hancock 2002). Acanthonevroides nigriventris (Malloch) has been
collected on trunks of Acacia and Eucalyptus and attracted to sawn saplings
and all species in the genus are likely to be tree trunk feeders (Permkam and
Hancock 1995, Hancock 2013). Larval hosts have not been recorded for any
species in the Neothemara subgroup.
The New Guinea-Pacific genera Anchiacanthonevra Hardy, Mimoeuphranta
Hardy and Parachlaena Hering (Fig. 1) were transferred from the
Acanthonevra group to the Dirioxa group by Hancock (2012), which also
includes Dirioxa Hendel, Lumirioxa and Micronevrina. The New Guinea
genus Griphomyia Hardy was initially placed in tribe Trypetini by Hardy
(1987) but the presence of secondary scutellar and intrapostalar setae,
together with the setose aculeus, suggest it is better placed in the
Acanthonevrini. Its precise relationships remain obscure but the distinct
intrapostalar setae, single midtibial spine and shape of the spermathecae
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3) 109
suggest it is best placed in the Dirioxa group, at least provisionally. It differs
from other acanthonevrine genera in the bare or micropubescent, rather than
plumose, arista. Larvae of Lumirioxa araucariae (Tryon) feed within a wet
rot beneath the bark of Araucaria cunninghamii trees (Araucariaceae)
(Brimblecombe 1945). Larvae of Dirioxa pornia (Walker) attack a wide
range of overripe or damaged fruit and even fallen Araucaria cones
(Permkam and Hancock 1995, Hancock et al. 2000), while those of D.
fuscipennis Hancock & Drew have been bred from the fruit of Barringtonia
edulis (Lecythidaceae) and Poutaria guayana (Sapotaceae) (Hancock and
Drew 2003). The hosts of other genera in the group remain unknown,
although the attraction of Micronevrina hyalina Permkam & Hancock and M.
montana Permkam & Hancock to sawn saplings (Hancock 2013) suggests
they also breed in trees.
Fig. 1. Parachlaena greenwoodi (Bezzi): male from Fiji.
110
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
Two further East or Southeast Asian genera sometimes included in the
Acanthonevrini, Hexaptilona Hering and Paracanthonevra Hardy, belong in
subfamilies Blepharoneurinae or Trypetinae respectively (Korneyev 1999,
Han 1999) and are not included here.
Key to Asian and Australasian genera
1
Scutum largely ivory-white posteriorly and with black patches antero- and
posterolaterally; scutellum ivory-white and unspotted, wing with
pterostigma about half length of cell c; head with 2 pairs each of frontal
and orbital setae; mid tibiae with 2 long apical spines [S and SE Asia; 2
species, keyed below] .... Diarrhegma group ... Diarrhegma Bezzi, 1913
Not as above; scutum and scutellum fulvous to black without tvory-white
markings; other characters variable [Australian and Pacific Regions] .... 2
Mid tibia with only 1 long apical and no distinct, shorter spines; wing
vein Cu, and Cu base both bare; cell m with 1 or (rarely) 2 hyaline
jes LEOLE 1016) RAAS AE PENAN en a L, ETE E Dirioxa group ... 3
Mid tibia with 2 long and subequal or 1 long and 1 or more shorter apical
spines, wing vein Cu, and/or Cu base often setulose; cell m with 0-3
hyaline indentations ....................sassasassaaaa Themaroides group ... 9
Arista bare or micropubescent; upper orbital seta weak or absent; 1 pair of
frontal setae; R-M crossvein placed near basal third of cell dm and below
or before middle of pterostigma; cell bcu extension vestigial [Papua New
Guinea (mainland and Bougainville); 5 spp, keyed and illustrated by
Arey IBT] 28 en! Al le ðr cence cis ates Ma aa Griphomyia Hardy, 1987
Arista plumose; upper orbital seta often well developed; 1 or 2 pairs of
frontal setae; R-M crossvein placed near or beyond middle of cell dm and
usually below or beyond apex of pterostigma; cell bcu extension distinct
Wing cell m with 2 distinct posterior hyaline indentations; apex of cell
rs hyaline except for a medial dark band or spot from wing margin
[Papua New Guinea (New Britain); 1 sp., illustrated by Hardy 1986] ......
LN Peete OTe SOR En Oe Tir Anchiacanthonevra Hardy, 1986
Wing cell m largely hyaline to subhyaline or with 1 distinct posterior
indentation; apex of cell 1445 NOt aS above .................sssisaaasisssaasaani 5
Upper orbital seta vestigial or absent; 1 pair of frontal setae; wing apex
hyaline across posterior half of cell 1243 and all of cell 1745 [Fiji; 1 sp,
illustrated in Fig. 1] .....0....00 00. eee Parachlaena Hering, 1944
Upper orbital seta normally distinct; 1 or 2 pairs of frontal setae; wing
apex not hyaline across posterior half of cell r2+, and all of cell 1445 ...... 6
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3) 111
6 Upper orbital seta weak, much shorter than lower seta; prescutellar
acrostichal setae absent; R-M crossvein placed below middle of
pterostigma; wing pattern largely hyaline to subhyaline with a narrow,
dark transverse band from costa over DM-Cu crossvein to posterior
margin [Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands; 1 sp., illustrated by
Hardy 1986] ..........................u................ Mimoeuphranta Hardy, 1986
— Upper orbital seta well developed, almost as long as lower seta;
prescutellar acrostichal setae present or absent; R-M crossvein placed
below or beyond apex of pterostigma; wing pattern dark, usually with
numerous hyaline spots and indentations .................sssasssssssaaaaaani 7
7 Anepimeral seta vestigial or absent; usually only 2 pairs of scutellar setae,
if 3 then medial pair weak and rudimentary; presutural setae present or
absent, if present then wing pattern distinctly sexually dimorphic; aculeus
apically dentate and bifid, the preapical setae minute [eastern Australia; 7
spp, keyed and illustrated by Permkam and Hancock 1995] ..................
abiha bitentats dA e R RA Puke Micronevrina Permkam & Hancock, 1995
— Anepimeral seta distinct; 3 pairs of scutellar setae, the medial pair at last
half length of apicals, presutural setae present and wing pattern not
sexually dimorphic; aculeus apically blunt and non-serrate, the preapical
sëtae Wwelldeyeloped sei etie hh hús, ae eet aa creed E a eon ii et 8
8 Thorax and scutellum with a black medial stripe; fore femur densely
setose ventrally in males; wing cell ry; with an elongate hyaline
indentation posteroapically [eastern Australia (seQld-neNSW); 1 sp.,
illustrated by Permkam and Hancock 1995 and in Fig. 2] ....................
PAAPA NWA d BOREAS ELM) RRO SIAP Lumirioxa Permkam & Hancock, 1995
— Thorax and scutellum fulvous, without a black medial stripe; fore femur
not densely setose ventrally in males; wing cell r4,5; entirely dark apically
[eastern Indonesia (Papua Province), Australia, New Caledonia and
Vanuatu; 3 spp, keyed below] .......................... Dirioxa Hendel, 1928
9 Wing cell m with at most a single posterior hyaline indentation ......... 10
— Wing cell m with 3 posterior hyaline indentations .............................
ie NAN eee AA ah r eke ASAA edn aan Tete tos Neothemara subgroup ... 11
10 Mid tibia with 2 long and subequal apical spines; scutellum bare or
densely setulose; scutum often with 2 pairs of supra-alar setae; wings
usually with hyaline spots or indentations, if largely brown and scutellum
not densely setulose then with an additional 2 pairs of secondary scutellar
Beta Sak AL Mot Nk OE Bee MeN! Themaroides subgroup ... 16
— Mid tibia normally with 1 long and 1 or more shorter apical spines;
scutellum bare or at most weakly setulose marginally; scutum with only 1
pair of supra-alar setae; wings largely brown without hyaline spots or
112 Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
indentations in at least anterior half; scutellum without additional pairs of
Secondary setae ................sissssssaaaiaaaasaa Clusiosoma subgroup ... 25
Fig. 2. Lumirioxa araucariae (Tryon): female from SE Queensland. Photograph by
Andy Wang (Queensland Museum).
11 Vein R+, curved sharply from level of DM-Cu crossvein to meet costa at
an angle of about 60°; wing pattern with numerous brown rays extending
to wing margin in cells 11, 1243 and 144; [Papua New Guinea (New Britain);
1 sp., illustrated by Hardy 1986]......... Quasirhabdochaeta Hardy, 1986
— Not as above; vein R»; not sharply curved towards costa and pattern
without dark marginal rays ..............iaiiaianasaaasasaanaaasaaaasaskassaaaa 12
12 Face vertical in profile, the epistome receding ........................ 2.2... 13
— Face concave in profile, the epistome projecting ........................... 14
13 Ocellar setae distinct and well developed; vein R4s distinctly curved
subapically then straightening to costa [eastern Indonesia (Papua
Province), Papua New Guinea and Australia (nQId); 2 spp, illustrated by
Hardy 1986 and Permkam and Hancock 1995] l..
RV Pak N E Benak K R TERNA Pseudacanthoneura Malloch, 1939
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3) 113
— Ocellar setae weak and hair-like; vein Ry; curving evenly to costa
[eastern Indonesia (West Papua and Papua Provinces), Papua New Guinea
and Australia (nQId); 2 spp, keyed by Hardy 1986; N. trigonifera Hering,
1951 was placed as a synonym of N. formosipennis (Walker, 1861) by
Permkam and Hancock 1995; illustrated by Hardy 1986 and Permkam
and Hancock 1995] ..............2.2.ssssssssssviiii Neothemara Malloch, 1939
14 Anepimeral seta vestigial; scutum yellow with only a small black spot
behind each wing base; mid tibia with apical spine scarcely longer than
small secondary spinules [Papua New Guinea; | sp., illustrated by Hardy
LIZO nin Sweats Ae khi bansa b ðD t Alloeomyia Hardy, 1986
— Anepimeral seta well developed; scutum with distinct dark markings; mid
tibia with 1 long and 1 shorter apical spines .....................2222aaniiaai 15
15 Vein Cu with basal portion along cell bcu setulose; wing with an oblique
hyaline band from apex of vein Cu2+A; to vein R4+s above line of DM-Cu
crossvein; scutellum with short black setulae at sides [eastern Indonesia
(Batjan), Papua New Guinea (New Britain, New Ireland, Bougainville)
and Solomon Islands; 2 spp, illustrated by Hardy 1986] ......................
STI R Matte ald ee Mea E VT Bask sted Pseudoneothemara Hardy, 1986
— Vein Cu bare, including basal portion; wing without an oblique hyaline
band from apex of vein Cu+A; to vein R4s above line of DM-Cu
crossvein; scutellum without marginal black setulae [eastern Indonesia
(Sulawesi, Aru, West Papua, Papua), Papua New Guinea and Solomon
Islands; 2 spp, illustrated by Hardy 1986; Lyronotum Hering, 1941, syn.
n. and Hyponeothemara Hardy, 1986 are both regarded as synonyms;
Acanthoneura seriata de Meijere, 1915, syn. n., the type species of
Lyronotum, is inseparable from Trypeta multistriga Walker, 1859, the
type species of Hexarestd] ...............sssssiaaaaii Hexaresta Hering, 1941
16 Wing with a row of long costal spines between humeral vein and apex of
Cel as, «Fei oe gS), r ok a Behe s oom Sel T Mos hehe 4. T 17
— Wing without a row of long costal spines between humeral vein and apex
GL Cel n eet a nh atte ha eats cette ae an ee e EOC L a te AS 18
17 Vein Cu base and Cu, both setulose; wing pattern not distinctly reticulate
[Papua New Guinea; 1 sp., illustrated by Hardy 1986] ........................
bee rac am RM, SU Sal R Tr. Jóla HR VASK JE Buloloa Hardy, 1986
— Vein Cu base and Cu, both bare; wing pattern distinctly reticulate on disc
[eastern Indonesia (Papua Province) and Papua New Guinea (mainland
and New Britain); 3 spp, keyed and illustrated by Hardy 1986] ............
sonia te act haste thas PROS a Saas reich Enoplopteron de Meijere, 1915
18 Wing with a complete hyaline transverse band from middle of costal cell
c and enclosing BM-Cu crossvein to posterior margin of cell cui, plus
incomplete transverse bands in cells r,+r243+br and 14+5+dm; apex of cell
114
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
r4s and cell m with elongate hyaline indentations; vein R4s strongly
curved anteriorly beyond R-M crossvein; vein M strongly curved
posteriorly before R-M crossvein so that cell dm is distinctly petiolate in
basal half [eastern Indonesia (West Papua Province); | sp., illustrated by
Hardy 1986] .......iiaiiiiisiiaaaiaasssaaadsaaaaakaaaa Walkeraitia Hardy, 1986
Wing pattern not as above, if banding evident then BM-Cu crossvein lies
within the dark area; veins Ry,; and M not both strongly curved ......... 19
19 Wing pattern dark with base largely hyaline and 5 narrow hyaline bands
not arising from costa: 2 longitudinal in cells rj+1o43 and 14; and 3
obliquely transverse in cells m, br+dm+cu, and cu,;; DM-Cu crossvein
inwardly oblique and curved towards wing base in anterior half [Australia
(seQld); 1 sp., illustrated by Permkam and Hancock 1995] ..................
ues Neen edt Bey Bic bal Wee Pee ce ale, Taeniorioxa Permkam & Hancock, 1995
Wing pattern not as above ...........isiiiaaniiassaaaaasaaasssaaaaaksssaaaaaaaa 20
20 Wing pattern with costal cell c hyaline medially and 4 incomplete,
21
obliquely transverse hyaline bands: an indentation in cells r)+143, a
curved band in cells r4,;+m, an apical band in cell dm and a narrow basal
band along vein Cuj+A, in cell cu, DM-Cu crossvein strongly outwardly
oblique, its apex situated below the apex of vein R+ at costa; scutellum
black and swollen, with 4 scutellar setae and dense setulae [Australia
(swQld); 1 sp., illustrated by Permkam and Hancock 1995] .................
cen ntbee aca Eð Ta Aridonevra Permkam & Hancock, 1995
Wing pattern not as above; DM-Cu crossvein not strongly outwardly
oblique, its apex situated basad of the apex of vein R»+3; if only 4 scutellar
setae then scutellum yellow medially ..................ssssssaassssaaaaaanaai 21
Vein M setulose along cell dm ...............niiniaiiiaaaaaaasaaaaaaaassaaaaaa 22
Vein M Dare gh Lc ee JL aE SR A A, a E e NE B ae. BE 23
22 Veins Cu base and Cu, setulose; wings normally dark brown with no
more than the posterior area hyaline; if base broadly hyaline then hyaline
patch from cell dm into cell 145 not extending into cell rə}, [eastern
Indonesia (Misool, West Papua, Papua) and Papua New Guinea; 9 spp,
keyed and illustrated by Hardy 1986]....... Themarohystrix Hendel, 1914
Veins Cu base and Cu, bare; wing base broadly hyaline; if hyaline patch
from cell dm into cell r4.; present then not extending into cell 12; [eastern
Indonesia (Papua Province) and Papua New Guinea (mainland and
Bougainville); 4 spp, keyed and illustrated by Hardy 1986] ...............
EE SLL LEO! Ok OE LE k Pind Oe Themaroidopsis Hering, 1941
23 Wing with anterior half brown beyond cell sc, if a quadrate hyaline
indentation present in cells 1;+1243, then cells br and r4+s without medial
hyaline spots and scutellum entirely setulose; head with lower orbital
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3) 115
setae placed below middle of frons [eastern Indonesia (Ambon, West
Papua, Papua) and Papua New Guinea (mainland and New Britain); 6
spp, keyed below; Rioxina Hering, 1941 is a synonym (Hardy 1986)] ...
MT M A E a bags M onia Themaroides Hendel, 1914
— Wing with a triangular hyaline indentation from costa in cell rı or ry+1243;
cells br and r4,; with medial hyaline spots present, if not then scutellum
only laterally setulose; head with lower orbital setae placed above middle
of frons, usually in upper quarter ...... 2.006... cece eee cece eens 24
24 Wing pattern blackish brown; scutellum black with a medial yellow band,
swollen and densely setulose [Australia; 5 spp, keyed and illustrated by
Permkam and Hancock 1995 and in Fig. 3; the South Australian A.
bicolor (Macquart, 1855) is a synonym of A. basalis (Walker, 1853)
(Hancock 1998)] ............ Acanthonevroides Permkam & Hancock, 1995
— Wing pattern brown and yellow-brown; scutellum pale with at most basal
dark patches, not swollen and setulose only laterally [eastern Indonesia
(Timor, Misool and Papua Province), Papua New Guinea and Australia);
11 spp, keyed below; Kertesziola Hering, 1941 is a synonym (Permkam
and Hancock 1995)] ..........iiiiissiasaaasaaaaii Termitorioxa Hendel, 1928
1mm
Fig. 3. Acanthonevroides jarvisi (Tryon): male from SE Queensland. Photograph by
Andy Wang (Queensland Museum).
116 Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
25 Wing veins Cu base and Cu, bare; anepisternum with a prominent black
seta near lower medial margin [Papua New Guinea and Australia (neQld);
2 spp, keyed and illustrated by Permkam and Hancock 1995 and
illustrated by Hardy 1986] ..................... Paedohexacinia Hardy, 1986
— Wing vein Cu base setulose; vein Cu, bare or setulose; anepisternum
without a prominent black seta near lower medial margin ................ 26
26 Wing vein Ri extending to beyond level of DM-Cu crossvein, the
pterostigma much longer than cell c [eastern Indonesia (Papua Province)
and Papua New Guinea; 1 sp., illustrated by Hardy 1986] ...................
seh E ð O Bul iy eRe beh note EEO Cheesmanomyia Malloch, 1939
— Wing vein R; ending near level of R-M crossvein, the pterostigma no
longer than cell c and normally much shorter ........................... a... 27
27 Face concave in profile, the epistome protruding; male fore tibia with a
densely white-pilose, pad-like posteroapical process [2 subgenera] ......
sae dy Tre eara da Abe detest pets Clusiosoma Malloch, 1926 ... 28
— Face vertical or convex in profile, the epistome not protruding .......... 29
28 Scutum black; face black; parafacials yellow; male fore femur with a
spinose basoventral tubercle but without ventral spines [Papua New
Guinea and Australia (nQld); 1 sp., illustrated by Hardy 1986 and
Permkam and Hancock 1995] ..... subgenus Paraclusiosoma Hardy, 1986
— Scutum partly fulvous; if face black then parafacials also black; male fore
femur with long ventral spines but no tubercle [eastern Indonesia
(Ambon, Waigeo, West Papua and Papua), Papua New Guinea (mainland,
New Britain, New Ireland), northern Australia and Solomon Islands; 14
spp, keyed and illustrated by Hardy 1986 (non-Australian species) and
Permkam and Hancock 1995 (Australian species); C. minutum (de
Meijere, 1913) appears to have the first and second antennal segments
black, not yellow as implied by Hardy (1986) and C. semifuscum
Malloch, 1926, syn. rev., separated by Permkam and Hancock 1995, is
returned to synonymy (as in Hardy 1986); for separation of pullatum
group males, see key below] ......... subgenus Clusiosoma Malloch, 1926
29 Face yellow with a pair of brown lateral spots on ventral half; scutum
yellow with a pair of submedial brown vittae extending onto scutellum
laterally; abdomen yellow with broad brown lateral margins; male fore
tibia with 2 preapical setae; male fore basitarsus with an apically
spinulose anteroventral process [eastern Australia; 1 sp., illustrated by
Permkam and Hancock 1995] .................. Clusiosomina Malloch, 1939
— Notas above; if face with dark spots or band then this is placed medially,
not in lower half; male fore basitarsus without an apical process ........ 30
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3) 117
30 Wing vein R; ending beyond line of R-M crossvein, the pterostigma as
3
long as cell c; scutum yellow with 6 black vittae not extending onto
scutellum [eastern Indonesia (Papua Province) and Papua New Guinea; 1
sp., illustrated by Hardy 1986] ............... Nothoclusiosoma Hardy, 1986
Wing vein R; ending at or before line of R-M crossvein, the pterostigma
shorter than cell c; scutum variable, if yellow with 6 black or brown vittae
then submedial pair extending over scutellum .......................00.005. 31
Face with a black medial spot; male with fore femur ventrally spinose,
fore tibia with a pad-like posteroapical process, fore basitarsus without a
ventral comb and surstyli long and slender [Papua New Guinea; 1 sp.,
illustrated by Hardy 1986] ..................... Hemiclusiosoma Hardy, 1986
Face black, yellow or with a pair of usually confluent lateral spots; male
with fore femur often not ventrally spinose, fore tibia without a pad-like
posteroapical process, fore basitarsus often with a ventral comb and
surstyli short and thick ...................... Trypanocentra ‘complex’ ... 32
32 Head with vertex developed into a sharp, thin, posteriorly directed keel;
33
face distinctly convex in profile, highest just below middle and receding
to epistome and often with a black, transverse medial band [eastern
Indonesia (West Papua), Papua New Guinea (mainland and New Britain),
Australia (neQId) and Solomon Islands; 3 spp, keyed and illustrated by
Hardy 1986; ‘R. fascifacies’ of Permkam and Hancock 1995 is a
misidentification of R. nigrotibia Hering (Hancock et al. 1998)] ...........
etn RNa Sy ote Ane A robs A EL os: ALEC a haters tut te! Rabaulia Malloch, 1939
Head with vertex at most weakly keeled, not posteriorly directed; face
normally vertical, if convex then all yellow and highest in middle ...... 33
Face gibbose, the convexity highest in the middle; face yellow and
unspotted; scutum with a pair of submedial black vittae; male fore
basitarsus with black ventral comb [eastern Indonesia (Papua Province)
and Papua New Guinea (mainland and New Britain); 1 sp., illustrated by
Hardy TIBG] hereunto deb ees Rad Rabauliomorpha Hardy, 1970
Face vertical in profile or almost so; colour of face and scutum variable;
male fore basitarsus with or without a ventral comb [2 subgenera] .........
ee ee ee eee ee ted eae Trypanocentra Hendel, 1914 ... 34
34 Male fore basitarsus with 1 or 2 ventral combs [eastern Indonesia (Papua
Province) and Papua New Guinea (mainland, New Britain, New Ireland);
5 spp, keyed and illustrated by Hardy 1986] ....................s...2asassa.sa
TE PEDO. he ee I TS E L subgenus Clusiomorpha Hering, 1941
Male fore basitarsus without a ventral comb [eastern Indonesia (Aru),
Papua New Guinea and Australia (neQld); 6 spp, keyed and illustrated by
Hardy 1986; additional illustrations of T. nigrithorax Malloch, 1939 in
Permkam and Hancock 1995] ...... subgenus 7rypanocentra Hendel, 1914
118
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
Key to Aethiothemara species
1
Pterostigma very elongate, the costal section in cell r; shorter than that in
cell 1213; vein M with last section shorter than the second last; hyaline
indentation in cell r; oval; mid femur with 4 long ventral setae [Equatorial
Guinea (Biok0)] ..........iisiissaasssssssaaaaaaaaan A. transiens Hendel, 1928
Pterostigma less elongate, the costal section in cell rı longer than that in
cell r233; vein M with last section longer than the second last; hyaline
indentation in cell r; quadrate; mid femur with 2 long ventral setae ....... 2
Pterostigma with apex hyaline, included within the hyaline indentation in
cell rı, which ends at vein Rə; hyaline spots in cells br and 14+5 narrow
and linear [Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea (Bioko), Gabon, Congo,
Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda; var. trispila (Bezzi, 1923)
has an additional hyaline spot in cell dm below R-M crossvein; illustrated
by Enderlein 1911] .......................... A. fallacivena (Enderlein, 1911)
Pterostigma with apex brown or black; hyaline indentation in cell rı
sometimes extends beyond vein R; hyaline spots in cells br and r4+5
often broad and rounded 2.00000... 000. c ccc cee cee ceeceeeeeeeeaeeueeees 3
Hyaline indentation in cell r; ends at vein R23; hyaline spots in cells br
and r4+5 elongate or broadly Oval ..............isisassasaaaaassaaaaaaaaasaaaaa 4
Hyaline indentation in cell r; extends beyond vein R>,3; hyaline spots in
cells br and 14+5 broadly rounded .............iisnasaisssasassasssssassassasasssssaaaai D
Scutum with dorsocentral setae placed just before the supra-alar setae;
hyaline spots in cells br and 145 about 1.5 times as high as broad
[Cameioon i n 2 ain SSA Ø, JE onlara A. trigona Hendel, 1928
Scutum with dorsocentral setae placed just behind the supra-alar setae;
hyaline spots in cells br and 1445 broadly oval [Uganda and Tanzania]
Mee mS TO a ð Mga ee A. graueri Hendel, 1928
Scutum and scutellum without (?) a pair of dark submedial vittae [“West
Africa’; only partially described in a key] .... A. speiseriana (Bezzi, 1924)
Scutum and scutellum with a pair of dark submedial vittae [Uganda;
probably synonymous with A. speiseriana] ........ A. striata Hendel, 1928
Key to Diarrhegma species
KA
= new records based on examined material in the Natural History
Museum, London (*) or photographs submitted for identification (^).
1
Abdomen with dark transverse bands narrower than yellow bands; wing
of male with a distinct hyaline spot in cell 14+5 (female with 2 spots) and
hyaline spots in cells 1243 and dm distinct [India and Sri Lanka*; Trypeta
incisa Wiedemann, 1824 and Trypeta viana Walker, 1849 are synonyms
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3) 119
(Hardy 1986, Hancock 1998); illustrated by Bezzi 1913 and Hancock and
Drew:-19994 DD iristeari heia Seat D. modestum (Fabricius, 1805)
— Abdomen with dark transverse bands broader than yellow bands; wing of
male without a hyaline spot in cell r4+s (female with 2 spots) and hyaline
spots in cells 12+3 and dm vestigial or absent [S China (Yunnan, Guangxi,
Guangdong*, Hong Kong*, Macau, Hainan), Vietnam’, Thailand, West
Malaysia*, Singapore”, Borneo, Indonesia (Java, Sumba) and southern
Philippines (Mindanao, Palawan); the citation of Ambon in the Moluccas
as the type locality (Bezzi 1913, Hardy 1986) appears to be an error, since
Doleschall (1856) mentioned only Jogjakarta in central Java in his
original description (Hancock and Drew 1994b) and the specimen is
possibly mislabelled; Diarrhegma eburata Zia, 1963 is a synonym
(Hancock and Drew 1994b); illustrated by Wang 1998 (both sexes) and
Zia 1963 COM ising epee ohne vacenep eprepean as gaecctnan D. paritii (Doleschall, 1856)
Key to Dirioxa species
1
Wing largely fuscous, without a hyaline costal indentation in cell r; above
R-M crossvein or a hyaline band across apex of cell dm; abdomen fulvous
to red-brown with or without dark transverse bands on terga IHI, III and
IV [Vanuatu; illustrated by Hancock and Drew 2003] ........................
Sa barð ab ahs taeda D. fuscipennis Hancock & Drew, 2003
Wing with a broad, quadrate hyaline costal indentation in cell r; above R-
M crossvein and a hyaline band across apex of cell dm; abdomen fulvous
on terga IHI, mostly or entirely black on terga I-V ........................ 2
Wing with posterior hyaline indentation in cell cu, extending broadly into
cell dm medially; hyaline apical band in cell dm distinctly broadened
anteriorly and often united posteriorly with medial indentation [Australia
and New Caledonia (introduced); Trypeta musae Froggatt, 1899 and
Rioxa confusa Hardy, 1951 are synonyms (Permkam and Hancock 1995);
illustrated by Hardy 1951 and Permkam and Hancock 1995] ...............
EE TAN E ETR E BERIETE atlece de D. pornia (Walker, 1849)
Wing with posterior hyaline indentation in cell cu, not extending into cell
dm; hyaline apical band in cell dm not broader anteriorly than posteriorly
[eastern Indonesia (Papua Province); illustrated by Hardy 1986; placed in
Dirioxa by Hancock and Drew 2003] ............. D. incerta (Hardy, 1986)
Key to Termitorioxa species
1
Wing cell 145 with a curved longitudinal hyaline band from spot above
DM-Cu crossvein to apex [Australia (Qld); illustrated by Permkam and
Hancock 1995] aaan T. bicalcarata (Hering, 1944)
— Wing cell 1445 without a curved longitudinal hyaline band at apex ........ 2
120 Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
2 Wing cell dm almost entirely hyaline or with an elongate medial hyaline
band along vein CAT ....aiiiiiiiaaaiiiaiiaaasssaasaasaasakaassaaskakassakkaaaaaaa 3
— Wing cell dm mostly brown and without an elongate hyaline band along
WE O R 2 JÁ Jo's að Weide) Cho al a ede stat Darren maaa a aT Aa emer
3 Wing cell dm almost entirely hyaline; large hyaline area in cell dm united
with large hyaline spots in cells br and r4+5; a second large hyaline spot in
cell r445 united with indentation in cell m; postnotum fulvous [Papua New
Guinea; illustrated by Hardy 1986] ................... T. flava (Hardy, 1986)
— Not as above; cell dm with an elongate medial hyaline band along vein
Cu,; cell r4, with second hyaline spot, if present, small and isolated;
postnotum largely blackish brown .............0. 0.000000 cece ee ec ec ee eee ees 4
4 Cell 145 with hyaline spot above DM-Cu crossvein united with
indentation in cell m; scutum fulvous [Australia (nQld); illustrated by
Permkam and Hancock 1995] .................... T. testacea (Hendel, 1928)
— Cell 145 with hyaline spot above DM-Cu crossvein not united with
indentation in cell m; scutum with a brown to black posterior border
[eastern Indonesia (Misool and Papua Province) and Papua New Guinea;
Ptilona lateralis Kertész, 1901 is a synonym (Hardy 1986); illustrated by
Hardy: 1986] ..: 2123 eresas rupnik T. meritoria (Walker, 1864)
5 Cell cu, with a hyaline indentation at apex below DM-Cu crossvein;
costal cell c hyaline [northern Australia; illustrated by Permkam and
Hancock 1995] ..................22.2 T. exleyae Permkam & Hancock, 1995
— Cell cu, without a hyaline indentation at apex below DM-Cu crossvein;
costal cell c hyaline or at least partly yellowish .............................. 6
6 Head with 1 pair of orbital setae; wing base pale yellowish, including
cells be MÀ ese RN PLE A I YOR YE RSS PST A 7
— Head with 2 pairs of orbital setae; wing base hyaline or with pale
yellowish markings in cell c or cells ctbr o.n 8
7 Scutum normally with a pair of brown patches adjacent to scutellum;
scutellum normally with a pair of dark basal patches; postnotum blackish
brown laterally; wing with hyaline spot in cell 145 not united with
indentation in cell m and pattern dark brown with distinct yellowish areas
in most of cell dm and around R-M crossvein; male with a tuft of fine
hairs at apex of arista [northern Australia; illustrated by Permkam and
Hancock 1995]... 0.0... T. termitoxena (Bezzi, 1919)
— Scutum and scutellum entirely fulvous; postnotum fulvous; wing with
hyaline spot in cell r4.; united with indentation in cell m; male without a
tuft of fine hairs at apex of arista [eastern Indonesia (Timor); illustrated
by Hardy 1986] ..........iisssaiiaaanasaaasaaaaaaaað T. timorensis Hardy, 1986
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3) 121
Cell r; with hyaline indentation small, not crossing into cell 1243; cell c
LTR ech NE ag 2 TB, each, Se ESOL SR Re ire Ne Let ONL LRT OI. fe AA 9
Cell rı with hyaline indentation large, crossing into cell 1243; cell c at least
partly yellowish nda hertan edna es da eet aa aa scarey a sie home 10
Cells br and 145 each with a distinct medial hyaline spot; hyaline spot at
apex of cell dm anteriorly placed [Australia (NT); illustrated by Permkam
and Hancock 1995] ............... T. inconnexa Permkam & Hancock, 1995
Cells br and 14+5 without distinct hyaline spots; hyaline spot at apex of cell
dm posteriorly placed [eastern Indonesia (Papua Province); illustrated by
Hardy 1986] aoa T. acanthoneurides (Hering, 1953)
10 Postnotum red-brown laterally; cells c+br yellowish, cell c sometimes
with only a complete yellow costal band [Australia (NT); illustrated by
Hancock 1996] ..................................... T. cobourgensis Hancock, 1996
Postnotum entirely fulvous; cell c with a yellow costal band over basal
two-thirds [northern Australia; illustrated by Permkam and Hancock
TOIS cig rie ve sabes Sara rnein T. laurae Permkam & Hancock, 1995
Key to Themaroides species
1
Pleura with a longitudinal black or brown vitta from proepisternum to
anatergite; wings largely brown, including costal cells ..................... 2
Pleura pale with at most a dark line along dorsal margin of anepisternum;
wings often with large hyaline indentations and base, including costal
cells, subhyaline or yellowish ............siiaiiasnanaaasssaasasaassaaaaaaaaaan 4
Scutum and scutellum with a complete medial black vitta; face with a
medial black vitta on lower half; additional small secondary scutellar
setae absent [eastern Indonesia (West Papua and Papua) and Papua New
Guinea; Rioxa debeauforti de Meijere, 1906 is a synonym (Hardy 1986);
illustrated by Hardy 1986] .................... T. abbreviatus (Walker, 1865)
Scutum and scutellum without a complete medial black vitta; face wholly
yellow; 2 pairs of additional small secondary scutellar setae present ...... 3
Scutum and scutellum yellow, without distinct dark vittae; scutellum
entirely densely setulose [Papua New Guinea; illustrated by Hardy 1986]
ad es a peel cect r abc ðe has Ser Meath T. robertsi Hardy, 1986
Scutum with 5 narrow, dark postsutural vittae; scutellum with dark lateral
vittae and only densely setulose laterally, bare medially [Papua New
Guinea; illustrated by Hardy 1986] .................. T. vittatus Hardy, 1986
Wings pale brown to subhyaline (possibly teneral) but without distinct
large hyaline marginal indentations; vein R4s straight, not curving
posteriorly in apical portion, the wing narrow and elongate [Papua New
Guinea; illustrated by Hardy 1986]............ T. xanthosoma Hardy, 1986
122 Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
— Wings dark brown, subhyaline to yellow basally and with large hyaline
marginal indentations in at least cells m and cu,;+dm; vein R4+s curving
posteriorly in apical portion, the wing normal in shape ..................... 5
5 Wing with a large quadrate hyaline indentation in cells rı and 1243 from
costa to vein R4s; posterior hyaline indentation confined to cells cu;+dm;
scutellum without an additional pair of small secondary setae [eastern
Indonesia (Ambon and West Papua) and Papua New Guinea; Helomyza
optatura Walker, 1865 is a synonym (Hardy 1986; illustrated by Hardy
162516 Ta hbase, MER ENT CA Bet asl tay T. quadrifer (Walker, 1861)
— Wing without an anterior hyaline indentation; posterior hyaline
indentation in cells cu;+dm extending into cell br; scutellum with an
additional pair of small secondary subapical setae [Papua New Guinea
(New Britain); illustrated by Hancock and Drew 2003] ......................
EA T. Me Bday TEs A A ae eae ema T. bicolor Hancock & Drew, 2003
Key to Clusiosoma pullatum group males
The pullatum group keys to couplet 14 in Hardy (1986). Males of the
Australian C. macalpinei Permkam & Hancock, 1995 (females unknown)
may be separated using the following key.
1 Face and genae yellow; occiput yellow posteroventrally; fore femur
broadly swollen and with a subbasal clump of ventral spinules in basal
third [Papua New Guinea; illustrated by Hardy 1986] .......................
ee ee Ee oe Oe Ye C. subpullatum Hardy, 1986
— Face and genae black; occiput black posteroventrally; fore femur without
a clump of ventral spinules in basal third .................i2ii iii aaa asa eee 2
2 Fore femur narrowly swollen and with long spines restricted to middle
third, absent from apical third [Papua New Guinea; illustrated by Hardy
DESC] A Aeae tad bates adn C. pullatum Hering, 1941
— Fore femur broadly swollen and with long spines continuous over middle
and apical thirds [Australia (nQld); illustrated by Permkam and Hancock
1995] ee ee TT D C. macalpinei Permkam & Hancock, 1995
Discussion
The Afrotropical Aethiothemara group of genera have mid tibiae with 1 long
and several short apical spines. One of the secondary spines is about half as
long as the main spine in Themarictera and all are about 1/5 as long in the
other genera (A. Freidberg pers. comm.). This is similar to the condition seen
in the Neothemara and Clusiosoma subgroups but cell m has only a single
marginal hyaline indentation and the pattern is not almost entirely brown,
suggesting a closer relationship with Diarrhegma and the Themaroides
subgroup and a homoplasious reduction in the size of the secondary spine.
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3) 123
It appears likely that the Aethiothemara, Diarrhegma and Themaroides
groups represent radiations in Africa, Asia and Australasia respectively, the
presence of tree-trunk breeders in all three groups suggesting that decaying
tissue beneath the bark is the ancestral larval food source. Fruit-feeding in
Themarictera, Dirioxa and the Clusiosoma subgroup, which infest different
fruit types, are therefore likely to represent homoplasious apomorphies.
All six African genera lack anepimeral (= pteropleural) setae and the R-M
crossvein is placed within the apical third of cell dm, supporting monophyly
of the group. Afrocneros, Labeschatia, Ocnerioxa and Ptiloniola have only 4
scutellar setae (apomorphy within the group) and appear to form a related
series; Aethiothemara and Themarictera have the usual 6 scutellar setae. In
Themarictera the pterostigma is shorter and the secondary midtibial spine
longer than in the other genera and the male head is expanded, similar in
shape to some Themara Walker species in the Acanthonevra group.
In the Southeast Asian genus Diarrhegma, the short, broad epandrium and
surstyli in males and long-setose, apically broadly rounded aculeus are
typical of the groups treated here. Although host records are few, it is likely
to be a non-generalist breeder beneath decaying tree bark.
In the Australasian 7Themaroides group, the Themaroides subgroup most
resembles the Diarrhegma group in having two long, subequal midtibial
spines. The male epandrium and surstyli are short and broad, narrowed
slightly in Termitorioxa and some Themarohystrix. The aculeus is apically
blunt or broadly rounded except in Themarohystrix, where the apex is
subtriangular and tapered to a blunt point (apomorphy). In Buloloa,
Themarohystrix and Themaroidopsis veins M and/or Cu+Cu, are setulose, a
character also seen in most Cl/usiosoma subgroup species. Buloloa and
Enoplopteron have a row of long setae on the costa (apomorphy). In the
Australian genera Acanthonevroides, Aridonevra and Taeniorioxa the
scutellum is distinctly swollen (apomorphy); these three genera, and possibly
also Walkeraitia, lack the additional supra-alar seta that is present
(apomorphy) in all the other genera, although in Termitorioxa the additional
seta is small and sometimes more than one are present. Walkeraitia and
Aridonevra share an unusually-shaped cell dm, narrowed in basal half and
broadly expanded in distal half, together with elements of the wing pattern,
that suggest a reasonably close relationship.
The Neothemara subgroup is characterised by the numerous hyaline spots or
indentations on the wing, including three marginal spots in cell M. Where
known, all have a short and broad epandrium and surstyli in males except in
Hexaresta multistriga (Walker), where the surstyli are distinctly narrowed
(apomorphy). The aculeus is apically blunt or broadly rounded except in
Neothemara digressa Hardy, where it is short and apically triangular
(apomorphy); this species is possibly generically distinct.
124 Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
Within the C/usiosoma subgroup, the male epandrium and surstyli are short
and broad in Nothoclusiosoma, Paedohexacinia, Rabaulia, Rabauliomorpha
and Trypanocentra, or long and slender (apomorphy) in Cheesmanomyia,
Clusiosoma, Clusiosomina and Hemiclusiosoma. An apical pad-like process
on the fore tibia (apomorphy) links Nothoclusiosoma with Clusiosoma and
Hemiclusiosoma; in Clusiosomina the pad is absent but the fore basitarsus
has a prominent anteroapical process (apomorphy) and in Cheesmanomyia
both are absent. The face is concave in Clusiosoma (apomorphy), convex in
Rabaulia and Rabauliomorpha (homoplasious apomorphies) and vertical or
nearly so in the other genera. The female aculeus is tapered and apically
acute (apomorphy) in Paedohexacinia and broadly blunt apically in all the
other genera. Rabauliomorpha and Trypanocentra (Clusiomorpha) both have
a ventral comb (apomorphy) on the fore basitarsus; its absence in subgenus
Trypanocentra suggests that Clusiomorpha should be raised to genus level
but further study is required. Additionally, T. (Trypanocentra) tricuneata
Hardy resembles Rabaulia in facial and scutal markings and has a distinct
keel on the vertex of the head, also suggesting that 7rypanocentra is
paraphyletic and in need of revision.
The Dirioxa group contains both rotting wood (e.g. Lumirioxa) and rotting
fruit infesters (Dirioxa) and, with its single midtibial spine, is possibly related
to the Acanthonevra group (Korneyev 1999). The epandrium and surstyli of
males are short and broad. The aculeus is normally long-setose and apically
blunt or broadly rounded (including in Parachlaena: see Hancock and Drew
1994a) except in Griphomyia, where it is short-setose and apically produced
to a blunt point (apomorphy) and in Micronevrina, where it is microsetose
and apically bifurcate (apomorphy). Griphomyia and Mimoeuphranta have
small secondary scutellar setae and similar wing pattern elements, including
the R-M crossvein placed below or before the midpoint of the pterostigma; in
the other genera it is placed near or beyond its apex. In Anchiacanthonevra
and Parachlaena cell r; has two distinct hyaline indentations from costa and
the apex of cell 1445 is extensively hyaline. The occasional use of fallen
Araucaria cunninghamii cones by Dirioxa pornia larvae links that genus with
Lumirioxa, which breeds beneath the bark.
Acknowledgements
I thank Susan Phillips for Figure 1, Andy Wang and Geoff Monteith
(Queensland Museum) for Figures 2 and 3, Amnon Freidberg (Tel Aviv
University, Israel) for information on the African genera and Daniel
Whitmore (Natural History Museum, London) for access to specimens in his
care.
References
BEZZI, M. 1913. Indian trypaneids (fruit-flies) in the collection of the Indian Museum, Calcutta.
Memoirs of the Indian Museum 3: 53-175, pls 8-10.
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3) 125
BEZZI, M. 1919. A new Australian species of Rioxa, with a remarkable life-habit (Dipt.:
Trypaneidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 10: 1-5.
BRIMBLECOMBE, A.R. 1945. The biology, economic importance and control of the pine bark
weevil, Aesiotes notabilis Pasc. Queensland Journal of Agricultural Science 2: 1-88.
DOLESCHALL, C.L. 1856. Eerste Bijdrage tot de Kennis der dipterologische Fauna van
Nederlandsch Indié. Natuurkundig Tijdschrift voor Nederlandsch Indié 10: 403-414, pl. 1.
ENDERLEIN, G. 1911. Trypetiden-Studien. Zoologische Jahrbucher. Abteilung für Systematik,
Oekologie und Geographie der Tierre 31: 407-460.
HAN, H.-Y. 1999. Phylogeny and behavior of flies in the tribe Trypetini (Trypetinae). Pp 253-
297, in: Aluja, M. and Norrbom, A.L. (eds), Fruit flies (Tephritidae): phylogeny and evolution of
behavior. CRC Press, Boca Raton; xviii + 944 pp.
HANCOCK, D.L. 1986. Classification of the Trypetinae (Diptera: Tephritidae), with a
discussion of the Afrotropical fauna. Journal of the Entomological Society of Southern Africa
49(2): 275-305.
HANCOCK, D.L. 1996. A new species and new combination in Australian Trypetinae (Diptera:
Tephritidae). Australian Entomologist 23(3): 87-90.
HANCOCK, D.L. 1998. Notes on some fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) described by Francis
Walker. Australian Entomologist 25(3): 67-68.
HANCOCK, D.L. 2002. A note on the biology of Termitorioxa termitoxena (Bezzi) (Diptera:
Tephritidae). Australian Entomologist 29(3): 96.
HANCOCK, D.L. 2003. An annotated checklist of the Tephritidae of Zimbabwe (Diptera:
Schizophora), with a key to subgenera of Dacus Fabricius. Cimbebasia 19: 111-148.
HANCOCK, D.L. 2011. An annotated key to the species of Acanthonevra Macquart and allied
genera (Diptera: Tephritidae: Acanthonevrini). Australian Entomologist 38(3): 109-128.
HANCOCK, D.L. 2012. Bamboo-stem flies: an annotated key to the species of the Sophira
complex of genera (Diptera: Tephritidae: Acanthonevrini). Australian Entomologist 39(1): 5-32.
HANCOCK, D.L. 2013. A revised checklist of Australian fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae).
Australian Entomologist 40(4): 219-236.
HANCOCK, D.L. 2014a. An annotated key to the Rioxa complex of genera (Diptera:
Tephritidae: Acanthonevrini). Australian Entomologist 41(1): 45-54.
HANCOCK, D.L. 2014b. An annotated key to the Dacopsis complex of genera (Diptera:
Tephritidae: Acanthonevrini), with two new genera and one new species. Australian
Entomologist 41(3): 163-176.
HANCOCK, D.L. and DREW, R.A.I. 1994a. Notes on some Pacific island Trypetinae and
Tephritinae (Diptera: Tephritidae). Australian Entomologist 21(1): 21-30.
HANCOCK, D.L. and DREW, R.A.I. 1994b. New species and records of Asian Trypetinae
(Diptera: Tephritidae). Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 42(3): 555-591.
HANCOCK, D.L. and DREW, R.A.I. 2003. New species and records of Phytalmiinae (Diptera:
Tephritidae) from Australia and the south Pacific. Australian Entomologist 30(2): 65-78.
HANCOCK, D.L., HAMACEK, E.L., LLOYD, A.C. and ELSON-HARRIS, M.M. 2000. The
distribution and host plants of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Australia. Queensland
Department of Primary Industries Information Series Q199067; iii + 75 pp.
126 Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
HANCOCK, D.L., OSBORNE, R. and McGUIRE, D.J. 1998. New hostplant and locality
records for Ceratitidinae and Trypetinae in northern Queensland (Diptera: Tephritidae). General
and Applied Entomology 28: 21-27.
HARDY, D.E. 1951. The Krauss collection of Australian fruit flies (Tephritidae—Diptera).
Pacific Science 5(2): 115-189.
HARDY, D.E. 1986. Fruit flies of the subtribe Acanthonevrina of Indonesia, New Guinea, and
the Bismarck and Solomon Islands (Diptera: Tephritidae: Trypetinae: Acanthonevrini). Pacific
Insects Monograph 42: 1-191.
HARDY, D.E. 1987. The Trypetini, Aciurini and Ceratidini of Indonesia, New Guinea and
adjacent islands of the Bismarcks and Solomons (Diptera: Tephritidae: Trypetinae).
Entomography 5: 247-373.
HENDEL, F. 1928. Neue oder weniger bekannte Bohrfliegen (Trypetidae) meist aus dem
Deutschen Entomologischen Institut Berlin-Dahlem. Entomologische Mitteilungen 17: 341-370.
KORNEYEV, V.A. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships among higher groups of Tephritidae. Pp
73-113, in: Aluja, M. and Norrbom, A.L. (eds), Fruit flies (Tephritidae): phylogeny and
evolution of behavior. CRC Press, Boca Raton; xviii + 944 pp.
MUNRO, H.K. 1925. Biological notes on South African Trypaneidae (fruut-flies). I. Union of
South Africa Department of Agriculture Entomology Memoirs 3: 39-67.
MUNRO, H.K. 1967. Fruitflies allied to species of Afrocneros and Ocnerioxa that infest
Cussonia, the umbrella tree or kiepersol (Araliaceae) (Diptera: Trypetidae). Annals of the Natal
Museum 18(3): 571-594.
PERMKAM, S. and HANCOCK, D.L. 1995. Australian Trypetinae (Diptera: Tephritidae).
Invertebrate Taxonomy 9: 1047-1209.
WANG, X.-J. 1998. The fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) of the East Asia Region. Acta
Zootaxonomica Sinica 21(Supplement): viii + 338 pp + 268 figs + 41 pls.
ZIA, Y. 1963. Notes on Chinese trypetid flies II. Acta Entomologica Sinica 12(5-6): 631-648.
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3): 127-128 127
FIRST RECORD OF PETRELAEA TOMBUGENSIS (ROBER)
(LEPIDOPTERA: LYCAENIDAE) FROM WESTERN AUSTRALIA
MICHAEL F. BRABY
Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200
Abstract
Petrelaea tombugensis (Rober, [1886]) is recorded from Western Australia for the first time in
the northern Kimberley. Adults were recorded in riparian evergreen monsoon vine forest during
May 2015. This new location, together with previous records from the “Top End’, NT and Cape
York Peninsula, Qld, suggest the species is distributed widely but sporadically throughout the
Australian monsoon tropics.
The lycaenid butterfly Petrelaea tombugensis (Rober, [1886]) has a sporadic
distribution within Australia. It was first recorded from the Australian
mainland only as recently as 1977, in northeastern Queensland near Iron
Range (McEvey 1977). It has since been recorded at a few other locations,
including Cobourg Peninsula, NT (Common and Waterhouse 1981), Torres
Strait (Muller et al. 1998), Lockerbie on Cape York Peninsula (Braby 2000),
and the Wet Tropics between Cairns and El Arish (Muller et al. 1998),
Queensland. Adults have mainly been recorded in monsoon vine thicket or
lowland rainforest in riparian areas where they are believed to breed on
Terminalia spp. with which they are strongly associated (Miller et al. 1998,
Braby 2000). The butterfly appears to be highly seasonal in its timing of
appearance.
In northwestern Australia, P. tombugensis is considered to be rare, known
previously only from two specimens (both males) collected from Black Point
on Cobourg Peninsula in the ‘Top End’ of the Northern Territory, on 26-27
January 1977 by E.D. Edwards (specimens examined in the Australian
National Insect Collection, Canberra). On 19 May 2015, I collected six
specimens (2 males, 4 females) of P. tombugensis from the Carson River
crossing on the Kalumburu Rd, approximately 18 km SSE of Kalumburu,
Western Australia (14.45277°S, 126.66373°E). They were associated with
riparian evergreen monsoon vine forest and were either flying around
vegetation 2-4 m above the ground or puddling from moist sand along the
edge of a stream. The specimens were all in relatively good condition,
according to the extent of wing wear, and had probably emerged shortly
before their capture.
The new location from the northern Kimberly in Western Australia extends
the range of this species 700 km southwest from its former western limit in
the Northern Territory. This new location, together with previous records
from the ‘Top End’ and Cape York Peninsula (and elsewhere in northeastern
Qld), suggest that P. tombugensis is distributed widely throughout the
monsoon tropics of northern Australia. Presumably, its apparent rarity is a
128 Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
consequence of its temporal and spatial distribution, being highly seasonal
and restricted to patches of riparian monsoon forest. Further work on the life
history and larval food plant specialisation is needed to determine the
species’ ecological requirements.
Acknowledgments
I thank G.J. Paras for his pleasant company in the field and E.D. Edwards for
access to material in the ANIC.
References
BRABY, M.F. 2000. Butterflies of Australia. Their identification, biology and distribution.
CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Melbourne; xx + 976 pp.
COMMON, LF.B. and WATERHOUSE, D.F. 1981. Butterflies of Australia. Revised edition.
Angus and Robertson, Sydney; xiv + 682 pp.
McEVEY, S.F. 1977. Notes from a collecting trip to Cairns and Iron Range including a new
record for the Australian mainland. Victorian Entomologist 7: 59-62.
MULLER, C.J., OLIVE, J. and LAMBKIN, T.A. 1998. New records for Petrelaea tombugensis
(Röber) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in Queensland. Australian Entomologist 25: 61-63.
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3): 129-132 129
TAGIADES NESTUS KORELA MABILLE, 1891
(LEPIDOPTERA: HESPERIIDAE: PYRGINAE) FROM
MER ISLAND, TORRES STRAIT, QUEENSLAND
S.S. BROWN’, C.E. MEYER’, R.P. WEIR? and C.G. MILLER“
119 Kimberley Drive, Bowral, NSW 2576 (Email: stnac@bigpond.com)
729 Silky Oak Avenue, Moggill, Old 4070 (Email: cmameyer@bigpond.com)
390 Horne Road, Bees Creek, NT 0822 (Email: Richard. Weir@nt.gov.au)
137 Alison Ave, Lennox Head, NSW 2478 (Email: cgrantmiller@bigpond.com)
Abstract
Tagiades nestus korela Mabille, 1891 is recorded from Mer (Murray) Island in Torres Strait for
the first time. One male specimen was collected on 12 April 2015 flying on a track in monsoon
forest near the centre of the island. T. n. korela is now known from three Torres Strait islands,
viz. Dauan, Erub (Darnley) and Mer.
Introduction
Tagiades Hübner contains twelve species distributed from Africa to northern
Australia (Parsons 1998, Braby 2000). In the Australian Region it is
represented by three taxa, viz. T. trebillius canonicus Fruhstorfer, 1910,
which is restricted to Papua New Guinea (Evans 1949), T. nestus korela
Mabille, 1891 and T. japetus janetta Butler, 1870, which are additionally
found in Torres Strait and eastern tropical Queensland (Parsons 1998).
Tagiades species prefer shaded areas and tracks beneath and adjacent to the
forest canopy or mangroves, usually around areas where their larval host
plant occurs (pers. obs.).
The first Australian specimen of 7. nestus (C. Felder) was collected on Erub
(Darnley) Island, Torres Strait in May 1910 by H. Elgner (Fig. 7) and is
housed in the Australia Museum, Sydney. It was illustrated as T. neira Plotz,
1885 by Waterhouse and Lyell (1914). Although not illustrated in his later
work, Waterhouse (1932) did make reference to this specimen as T. neira,
belonging in the T. nestus species group. It was assigned to T. nestus korela
by Common and Waterhouse (1972).
After this initial collection, there were no further records of this species from
Australia until it was rediscovered, in April 2004, on Dauan Island, Torres
Strait (Valentine and Johnson 2005). On that occasion the immature stages
were also recorded, on climbing yam vines (Dioscorea sp.: Dioscoraceae). In
April 2015, we conducted a butterfly survey on Mer, Dauan and Saibai
Islands. While on Mer Island, a male T. n. korela (Figs 1-2) was observed
and collected in monsoon forest in the central part of the island.
Mer Island lies in the far east of Torres Strait, roughly 120 km SE of Papua
New Guinea at its closest point. Roughly circular in shape and approximately
2.8 km by 1.7 km in size, it is the result of Pleistocene era volcanic activity,
with the major land formation behind the village consisting of a volcanic vent
composed of poorly consolidated scoria and ash (Torres Strait Regional
130 Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
Authority 2013). Thus, this part of the island is extremely porous and, with
its associated severe drainage, limits the nature and abundance of vegetation
growing on the western half of the island. The eastern half of the island is
predominantly monsoon forest mixed with many introduced species and it is
in this area that most butterflies were collected.
Discussion
Tagiades nestus korela is now known to occur on three islands in Torres
Strait, viz. Dauan in the north and Mer and Erub in the east. Due to the
widespread planting of yam vines on many of the Torres Strait islands and
hundreds of years of inter-island trade between them and Papua New Guinea
(Doug Passi and Barbara Waterhouse pers. comms.), it is feasible that
individuals were transported to the islands as immatures on yam plants. It is
also possible that the insect has existed on the islands since they were
connected by a land bridge, when Torres Strait was a part of the Sahul shelf
(Parsons 1998). Tagiades japetus janetta (Figs 3-6) is not known from Mer
Island but the two species are sympatric on Dauan Island. In January 2011,
one of us (CEM) collected a pupa on Dauan Island in a typical Tagiades
shelter on Dioscorea sp., which emerged as T. n. korela. At the same time,
within 300 metres of that spot, one of us (SSB) collected a T. j. janetta male
(Figs 3-4). Based on our records, T. j. janetta is more widespread and
observed more frequently on Dauan Island than T. n. korela.
The original Elgner specimen of T. n. korela is labelled as having passed
through the C.W. Wyatt Theft Collection. This refers to the activities of Colin
Wyatt, an English amateur entomologist who stole specimens from a number
of Australian Museums (and the Natural History Museum in London) in the
1930s and 1940s. Wyatt appeared at Westham Magistrates Court in London
in 1947 and was fined £100 when he pleaded guilty to the unlawful
possession of a large number of Australian specimens. These were returned
to Australia, where it was found that labels on a number of specimens had
been removed or altered, presumably to conceal their provenance. All such
Specimens now bear yellow labels alerting researchers to the fact that they
passed through Wyatt’s hands and that labels may be inaccurate (John
Tennent pers. comm. ).
E.D. Edwards (pers. comm.) also provided information regarding the veracity
of the label data on Elgner’s historical specimen of T. n. korela, stating: ‘The
specimens stolen by Wyatt were returned to the South Australian Museum
(which was also robbed of specimens by Wyatt) and the specimens belonging
to the different Australian institutions sorted out by Norman Tindale.
Waterhouse was too ill to travel to Adelaide to do it. While Waterhouse may
have complained about some details of Tindale’s sorting, he would have
made sure such an historic specimen was returned to the Australian Museum
with the right labels. The Elgner label is genuine, the date is right, the sex is
right’.
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3) 131
Australian Museum
TORRES STRAIT IS. K 455977
[Darney L£. )
Figs 1-7. Tagiades spp: (1-2) T. nestus korela from Mer Island: (1) upperside; (2)
underside (forewing length 21 mm). (3-4) T. japetus janetta (Papua New Guinea
form) from Dauan Island: (3) upperside; (4) underside (forewing length 22 mm). (5-6)
T japetus janetta from Thursday Island, Torres Strait: (5) upperside; (6) underside
(forewing length 21 mm). (7) T. nestus korela from Darnley Is, 15.v.[19]10, H. Elgner
(Image source: Australia Museum: Russell Cox).
132 Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
The tornus of the left hind wing has been repaired at some stage. This repair
seems to have been done after the specimen was illustrated in Waterhouse
and Lyell (1914) as the illustrated specimen is lacking the third black spot on
the tornus of the left hind wing.
In spite of the Elgner specimen’s journey and repairs, it seem safe to assume
that the specimen in the Australian Museum is genuine as it was illustrated
only four years after it was collected and the label (Fig. 5) appears consistent
with other Elgner labels.
Thus, given the fresh condition of our specimen, the isolation of Mer Island
and the abundance of the larval host plant on the island, the species is most
likely established on the island.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Mr Doug Passi (Chairman of the Prescribed Bodies
Corporate on Mer Island), Mr Joey Tapau (Biosecurity Officer, Mer Island)
and the people of Mer Island for permission to visit and conduct the butterfly
survey there. We thank Mr E.D. Edwards for information regarding the
history and validity of the Elgner record of 7. n. korela from Erub (Darnley)
Island, John Tennent (Natural History Museum, London) for information
regarding the C.W. Wyatt Theft Collection and Dr David Britton, Russell
Cox and Jacquie Recsei of the Australian Museum, Sydney for providing the
digital image and contextual information relating to the 1910 H. Elgner
record of 7. n. korela. We also thank Dr Trevor Lambkin for his comments
on the manuscript.
References
BRABY, M.F. 2000. Butterflies of Australia: their identification, biology and distribution.
CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood; xxvii + 976 pp.
COMMON, I.F.B and WATERHOUSE, D.F. 1972. Butterflies of Australia. Angus & Robertson,
Sydney; 498 pp, 41 pls.
EVANS, W.H. A catalogue of the Hesperiidae from Europe, Asia and Australia in the British
Museum (Natural History). British Museum (Natural History), London; 502 pp.
PARSONS, M. 1998. The butterflies of Papua New Guinea: their systematics and biology.
Academic Press, London; xvi + 736 pp, 162 pls.
TORRES STRAIT REGIONAL AUTHORITY. 2013. Profile for management of the habtats and
related ecological and cultural resource values of Mer Island. Available at: http:/Avww.tara.gov.
au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/4499/Mer_Biodiversity_Profile_January_2013.pdf
VALENTINE, P.S. and JOHNSON, S.J. 2005. The rediscovery of Tagiades nestus (C. Felder)
(Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Pyrginae) in Australia. Australian Entomologist 32: 155-156.
WATERHOUSE, G. 1932. What butterfly is that? Angus & Robertson, Sydney; viii + 291 pp,
34 pls.
WATERHOUSE, G.A. and LYELL, G 1914 The butterflies of Australia. A monograph of the
Australian Rhopalocera. Angus & Robertson, Sydney; vi + 239 pp.
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3): 133-147 133
A NEW SUBSPECIES OF HASORA HURAMA (BUTLER, 1870)
(LEPIDOPTERA: HESPERITDAE: COELIADINAE) FROM THE
NORTHERN TERRITORY, AUSTRALIA
C.E. MEYER’, R.P. WEIR’ and S.S. BROWN?
129 Silky Oak Avenue, Moggill, Old 4070 (Email: cnameyer@bigpond.com)
790 Horne Road, Bees Creek, NT 0822 (Email: richard.weir@nt.gov.au)
319 Kimberley Drive, Bowral, NSW 2576 (Email: stnac@bigpond.com)
Abstract
Hasora hurama territorialis subsp. n. is described and figured from the ‘Top End’, Northern
Territory, Australia. Distinct differences in adult phenotype separate it from populations of the
nominate subspecies H. hurama hurama (Butler, 1870) from Queensland, Australia and from
other subspecies in the Moluccas, mainland New Guinea and adjacent islands eastwards through
the Bismarck Archipelago to the Solomon Islands. The two subspecies in Australia are
geographically isolated and are consistent in their character differences. Hasora h. hurama is
newly recorded from Dauan Island, northern Torres Strait.
Introduction
Hasora hurama (Butler, 1870) ranges from the Moluccas, Aru, Biak,
Maluku, through mainland New Guinea and adjacent islands and northern
Australia to the Bismarck Archipelago and Solomon Islands (Evans 1949,
Parsons 1998, Braby 2000, Tennent 2002). Evans (1949) recognised four
subspecies but subsequently described a fifth, H. h. diana Evans, 1958, from
Rennell Island (Evans 1958). Two subspecies occur in Papua New Guinea,
with Æ. h. hurama (Butler, 1870) widespread throughout the mainland and its
adjacent islands and H. h. kieta Strand, 1921 occurring in the Admiralties and
most of the Solomon Islands (Evans 1949, Parsons 1998, Tennent 2002). In
eastern Indonesia, H. h. mola Evans, 1949 occurs on the Bacan Islands in
northern Maluku and H. h. arua Evans, 1934 occurs on the Aru Islands in
eastern Maluku (Evans 1949). Hasora h. diana is restricted to Rennell and
Bellona Islands in the Solomon Islands (Evans 1958, Tennent 2002). Only H.
h. hurama has been recognised previously from the Australian subregion
(Common and Waterhouse 1981, Braby 2000).
The type locality of H. h. hurama is Cape York, Queensland (Edwards et al.
2001). In Australia it has been recorded from the Torres Strait islands of
Dauan (CEM in April 2015, T.A. Lambkin pers. comm. and here noted as a
new northern record for Australia), Mer (Murray), Dauer and Hammond
(T.A. Lambkin pers. comm.), Moa and Thursday, and on the mainland at
Cape York, from Cooktown to Townsville and from the Mackay district
(Common and Waterhouse 1981, Braby 2000), including the Conway Ranges
near Proserpine and the Broken River near Eungella, all in eastern
Queensland (Braby 2000). In the Northern Territory it has been recorded
from Buffalo Creek, near Lee Point, Darwin, south through the Elizabeth
River Bridge on the Stuart Highway near Noonamah, east-south-east to Fogg
Dam, the Beatrice Hill region on the Adelaide River flood plain, and further
134 Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
east on the Blyth River (Peters 1969, Braby 2000, Meyer et al. 2006) and
new Nangnak outstation (Bisa 2013). Braby (2000) noted that H. h. hurama
shows little variation throughout its range.
For many years we have suspected that there are significant differences in
adult phenotype between H. hurama specimens from the Northern Territory
and those from Queensland, warranting further examination. We consulted
relevant literature and compared specimens held in our private collections
with the type specimens of H. h. hurama (Figs 1-3), H. h. mola (Figs 4-6), H.
h. arua (Figs 7-9) and H. h. diana (Figs 10-12) held in the Natural History
Museum, London (BMNH). We concluded that the Northern Territory
population warrants recognition as a distinct subspecies.
All specimens held in the author’s private collections of the nominate
subspecies from Queensland examined are detailed at Appendix 1. Appendix
2 details the voucher specimens of H. h. territorialis subsp. n. examined and
used in the description of this subspecies.
Abbreviations for specimen repositories. AMC — Australian Museum
Collection, Sydney; ANIC — Australian National Insect Collection, Canberra;
BMNH — Natural History Museum, London; CEMC — C.E. Meyer
Collection, Brisbane; DALC — D.A. Lane Collection, Atherton; MFBC —
M.F. Braby Collection, Canberra, NTMC — Museum and Art Gallery of the
Northern Territory Collection, Darwin; RPWC — R.P. Weir Collection, Bees
Creek; SSBC — S.S. Brown Collection, Bowral.
Abbreviations for collectors. CEM — C.E. Meyer; DNW — D.N. Wilson;
MFB — M.-F. Braby; RPW — R.P. Weir; SSB — S.S. Brown.
Hasora hurama territorialis subsp. n.
(Figs 17-20)
Types: Holotype 6, NORTHERN TERRITORY: Adelaide River Bridge, Bred/larva,
em[erged] 4.11.1994, C.E. Meyer (in ANIC). Paratypes: 3 99, Fogg Dam, 22.iv.1991,
D.N. Wilson; 1 ĝ, Buffalo Creek, 3.iii.1992, C.E. Meyer; 1 4, Adelaide River, em.
22.ix.1992, C.E. Meyer; 1 Æ, 1 Q, same data except em. 24.ix.1992; 1 Æ, same data
except em. 27.ix.1992; 2 SÆ, same data except em. 4.ii.1994 and 5.ii.1994; 19, same
data except em. 10.11.1994; 1 9, Adelaide River Bridge on Arnhem Hwy, em.
16.iv.1995, C.E. Meyer; 3 Æ, same data except em. 18.11.1995, 23.iv.1995 and
6.ix.1998; 1 Æ, Adelaide River Hunting Reserve, Arnhem Hwy, via Darwin, em.
10.iv.2009, C.E. Meyer & R.P. Weir; 1 ĝ, Adelaide River Bridge environs, Arnhem
Hwy, em. 3.v.2013, C.E. Meyer & R.P. Weir; 1 ĝ, same data except, em. 14.v.2013;
3 22, same data except em. 14.v.2013 and 15.v.2013 (all in CEMC); 1 Q, Adelaide
River, 8.v.1989, D.N. Wilson; 2 99, Fogg Dam, 22.iv.1991, D.N. Wilson; 2 22,
Berrimah Research Farm, 8.iv.1994, R.P. Weir; 1 Q, same data except 15.1v.1994;
1 Q, 10 km East, Adelaide River, 7.viii.1996, R.P. Weir, 1 Æ, Adelaide River, em.
6.11.2008, R.P. Weir & S.S. Brown; 1 ĝ, 1 Q, Adelaide River, em. 5.iv.2009, R.P.
Weir & C.E. Meyer; 5 bo, 3 22, Beatrice Hill, em. 1.iii.2000, R.P. Weir, 2 29,
Adelaide River, em. 5.iii.2013, R.P. Weir & M.J. Griffiths (all in RPWC); 2 G,
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3) 135
4 29, Fogg Dam, 22.iv.1991, S.S. Brown (all in SSBC); 1 Æ, Adelaide River, em.
2.v.1995, D.A. Lane & C.E. Meyer (in DALC); 1 9, Adelaide River, 10km NE
Arnhem Hwy, 9.v.1991, D.N. Wilson (NTM 1004069); 1 Æ, Beatrice Hill (Window
on the Wetlands Visitor Centre), Adelaide River floodplain, M.F. Braby (NTM
1004726) (both in NTMC); 2 Æ, 1 Q, 12.64956°S, 131.31851°E, Beatrice Hill,
17.1.2009, M.F. Braby; 1 Æ, same data except 23.1.2010; 1 Q, 12°39736”S,
131°20°11”E, Adelaide River crssng, Arnhem Hwy, em. 15.x1.2010, M.F. Braby;
2 dh, 2 99, same data except em. 17.xi.2010; 1 3, 1 Q, same data except em.
18.xi.2010; 1 Q, same data except em. 19.xi.2010; 1 Æ, same data except em.
21.xi.2010; 1 Q, same data except em. 27.xi.2010; 1 Æ, same data except em.
7.xii.2012; 1 4, 12°39°36”S, 131°20’11”E, Adelaide River crossing, Arnhem Hwy,
em. 12.vii.2013, M.F. Braby & L. A. Lilleyman; 1 9, same data except em.
16.vii.2013; 1 Æ, 12.40329°S, 132.96107°E, East Alligator, near Ubirr, Kakadu NP,
em. 13.x.2013, M.F. Braby; 1 Æ, same data except em. 16.x.2013; 1 2, same data
except em. 20.x.2013; 2 9 Q, same data except em. 28.x.2013; 1 9, same data except
em. 30.x.2013 (all in MFBC); 1 £, Blyth River, 21.ix.1968, F. Omer-Cooper (Reg.
No: K.446984); 1 2, Adelaide River, 13.1.1962, T.E. Moulds (Reg. No: K.446985)
(both in AMC); 1 Q, Fogg Dam, 22.1v.1991, D.N. Wilson (in ANIC).
Description. Male (Figs 17-18). Upperside: dull dark chocolate-brown, with
lighter brown basal hairs; forewing with an irregular dull brown-black sex-
brand between vein M; and dorsum: head and thorax with light brown hairs;
antennae black with strongly curved apiculus. Underside: ground colour
lighter chocolate-brown than above, with forewing margins lighter brown;
hindwing darker brown than forewing and generally with a purplish sheen
especially in newly emerged specimens; hindwing with an uninterrupted
broad white postmedian band extending from mid-costa towards the tornus
turning sharply at vein 1A+2A to the inner margin; vein 1A+2A sometimes
suffused with brown scales; the white band is narrowest at the costa and at its
broadest between veins M; and CuA,; hindwing with a dark brown-black
tornal patch and a white line along the termen from the tornus to vein Mi.
Measurements (forewing length / wingspan). holotype 21.0 / 37.5 mm. Mean
20.9 / 37.6 mm (n = 32).
Male genitalia (Figs 24-26). The genitalia of H. h. hurama (Figs 21-23) and
H. h. territorialis are overall similar. In H. h. territorialis the valva is not as
humped posteriorly as in H. h. hurama and the apical dorsal margin is very
angular and produced, with a short projection at the end of the inner margin,
whereas in H. h. hurama it is more rounded. In H. h. territorialis, the saccus
is shorter and club-shaped compared with the thin and extended condition in
H. h. hurama. The uncus of H. h. territorialis is also broader and more
curved and talon-like than in H. h. hurama. The tegumen is also more pointed
in H. h. territorialis than in H. h. hurama. The aedeagi are similar in both
subspecies.
Female (Figs 19-20). Upperside: similar to male but without the forewing
sex-brand. Underside: similar to male but with a slightly broader white
136 Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
postmedian band and hindwing ground colour with a brighter purplish sheen.
Measurements (forewing length / wingspan). 21.2 / 37.9 mm (n = 44).
Etymology. The subspecific epithet, an adjective, refers to it being found in
the Northern Territory, Australia.
Godman-Salvin
Coll. E rÐ, — 5.
W
=
y M WAY Vy I HAR t's ii p Hii l ll riya l ' APE ny
M ah 2345 t i agen | vaksnan taat baa pp n la ua iM le
TaN WAU VV YEWEL WOU
WON NUn ic TNT TURKU AHN wanasaas
ATI
* |
idae h. Á NEETI HRN ERLT Di ED RN n 14 123466789. Hl] 7391123456789 ||
H jar hil tek
RENNELL |. Expdn.
B.M, 1954-222.
PITE PEETER u TVI I á aS OO PVA l Í BIMINH E) 1623547
Figs 1-12. Hasora hurama subspecies type specimens from BMNH: (1) H. h. hurama
male upperside; (2) H. h. hurama male underside; (3) H. h. hurama label data; (4) H.
h. mola male upperside; (5) H. h. mola male underside; (6) H. h. mola label data; (7)
H. h. arua male upperside; (8) H. h. arua male underside; (9) Æ. h. arua label data;
(10) H. h. diana male upperside; (11) H. h. diana male underside; (12) H. h. diana
label data. All images @ Natural History Museum, London.
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3) 137
Figs 13-20. Hasora hurama subspecies from Australia: (13-16) H. h. hurama adults
from Queensland: (13) male upperside; (14) male underside; (15) female upperside;
(16) female underside. (17-20) H. h. territorialis subsp. n. adults from the Northern
Territory: (17) holotype upperside; (18) holotype underside; (19) paratype female
upperside; (20) paratype female underside.
138 Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
23
25 26 N
Figs 21-26. Hasora hurama male genitalia: (21-23) H. hurama hurama from Innisfail,
Queensland: (21) lateral view of tegumen, uncus and valva; (22) lateral view of valva;
(23) aedeagus. (24-26) H. hurama territorialis subsp. n. from Fogg Dam, Northern
Territory: (24) lateral view of tegumen, uncus and valva; (25) lateral view of valva;
(26) aedeagus.
24
Diagnosis
Hasora hurama territorialis subsp. n. phenotypes (Figs 17-20) can be
separated from H. h. hurama (Figs 1-3, 13-16), H. h. arua (Figs 7-9), H. h.
diana (Figs 10-12) and H. h. kieta (Tennent 2002, plate 1, figs 28-29)
principally by the narrower white band of the hindwing underside. It is
closest to H. h. mola (Figs 4-6) but the white band on the hindwing underside
of H. h. territorialis is more uniformly narrow and not as pointed at the costa.
Additionally, specimens of H. h. territorialis generally have a purplish sheen
over the hindwing underside.
Biology
Food plant. Derris trifoliata Lour. (Fabaceae).
Life history. The life history of H. h. hurama was first described by Manski
(1940) and updated by Braby (2000). The immature stages of H. h.
territorialis are similar to those of H. h. hurama as described by Braby
(2000), with some minor morphological differences in larval and pupal
colouring and markings. In the final instar larva of H. h. territorialis (Figs
27-28) the head is paler brown and the body ground colour paler pinkish-
brown and lacking the prominent dorsolateral black patches on abdominal
segments found in H. h. hurama (Fig 27). The pupa of H. h. territorialis
(Figs 29-30) has paler abdominal segments with the spiracles pale brown as
opposed to brown-black in H. h. hurama (Fig 29). The black mid-dorsal line
on the thorax of H. h. hurama is lacking in the pupa of H. h. territorialis.
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3) 139
Figs 27-30. Hasora hurama larvae and pupae: (27) H. hurama hurama final instar
larva dorsal view; (28) H. hurama territorialis final instar larva dorsal view; (29) H.
hurama hurama pupa dorsolateral view; (30) H. hurama territorialis pupa lateral
view.
Ecology and behaviour. Eggs are laid on the new growth of the food plant,
which grows adjacent to mangroves or within mixed monsoon forest-
mangrove associations. Breeding areas are in estuarine habitats along river
banks in flood plains. Adults have been more commonly observed flying
along the mangrove margins, with a quick jerky flight, frequently settling on
the tendrils of the food plant or sticks protruding from the foliage. Once
disturbed the adults quickly take flight. The larvae make a series of shelters,
initially in the immature leaves, by joining the sides of the leaves together
with silk and then later in the mature leaves where pupation takes place.
Larvae of H. h. territorialis, like those of H. h. hurama, frequently consume
all available new growth of the food plant with the availability of new growth
affecting the size of the emergent adult. To date, adults have been recorded in
the Northern Territory in all months of the year, with the life cycle of the
butterfly being triggered by new growth on the food plant.
Discussion
Evans (1949) noted that H. h. mola was smaller and paler than H. h. hurama,
having a male forewing length of 22 mm as opposed to 23-25 mm in H. h.
hurama, and with no purple gloss on the hindwing underside. Evans (1949)
140 Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
also noted that the white band on the hindwing underside in H. h. mola was
very narrow, tapering to 1⁄2 mm at the costa. Specimens of H. h. territorialis
are also smaller than specimens of H. h. hurama and also slightly smaller
than those of H. h. mola, having an average male forewing length of 20.9 mm
(n = 32), although this is probably not statistically significant. Specimens of
H. h. territorialis generally have a purplish sheen over the hindwing
underside that is absent in H. h. mola. The white band on the hindwing
underside in H. h. territorialis is a different shape to that of H. h. mola, being
more uniformly narrow, less swollen medially and not as pointed at the costa.
Hasora h. mola is also geographically isolated from H. h. territorialis,
occurring some 1300 km to the north of the Northern Territory.
Hasora hurama territorialis and H. h. hurama are allopatric and as such are
reproductively isolated. Hasora h. territorialis is distinct in its adult
phenotype and, although it shares the same food plant as H. h. hurama, its
larval and pupal stages are morphologically different. The food plant, Derris
trifoliata, has not been recorded from the Kimberley of Western Australia or
from the Gulf Country of southwestern Queensland (AVH 2015). The male
genitalia of H. h. territorialis are significantly different from those of H. h.
hurama.
In Australia, adults of H. h. territorialis (Figs 17-20) can be separated from
those of H. h. hurama (Figs 13-16) by the following characters. Size: H. h.
territorialis is generally smaller with an average forewing length / wingspan
of 20.9 / 37.6 mm (n = 32) in males and 21.2 / 37.9 mm (n = 44) in females,
compared with 22.9 / 41.9 mm (n = 17) and 22.5 / 41.5 mm (n = 22)
respectively in H. h. hurama. Colour: the upperside wing colour of H. h.
territorialis is dull chocolate-brown, whereas in H. h. hurama it is a rich dark
reddish-brown. The underside colour is also paler in H. h. territorialis than in
H. h. hurama, giving the appearance of a paler insect. Wing, head and thorax
hairs in H. h. territorialis are light brown and rarely have the greenish-bronze
colouration noted by Braby (2000) in specimens of H. h. hurama. Hindwing
underside: the white band in H. h. territorialis is approximately half the
width of the band in H. h. hurama, being on average 2.3 mm (n = 32) in
males and 2.6 mm (n = 44) in females at its widest, compared with 4.7 mm (n
= 17) and 4.6 mm (n = 22) respectively in H. h. hurama. The white band in
H. h. territorialis is, however, broader than in either H. chromus chromus
(Cramer, [1780]) or H. khoda haslia (Mabille, 1876), both also found in
Australia. The male forewing sex brand is similar in both subspecies.
The geographic isolation of the two populations of H. hurama in Australia
has undoubtedly contributed to the observed differentiation within each
region. Future surveys in coastal areas in the Kimberley region of Western
Australia and in the Gulf Country of northwestern Queensland would help to
understand the full extent of the butterfly’s distribution across northern
Australia.
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3) 141
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Mark Hopkinson, Ted Edwards, You Ning Su, Gavin
Daly, Jared Archibald, Dr Michael Braby, Dr Dave Britton, John Chainey,
Dave Lane and Dr Trevor Lambkin: Mark Hopkinson, for the provision of
nominate race immature stages; Ted Edwards, for access to literature,
provision of ANIC specimen data, genitalia dissections and for his support in
the development of this paper; You Ning Su, for the genitalia photographs;
Gavin Daly and Jared Archibald, for the provision of data for specimens in
the NTM; Dr Michael Braby, for the provision of data for specimens in his
private collection and for constructive comments on an initial draft of the
manuscript; Dr Dave Britton, for the provision of data for specimens in the
AM; John Chainey, for the provision of photographs of the type specimens
held in the BMNH; Dave Lane for provision of data for specimens in his
private collection; and Dr Trevor Lambkin for permission to include his
unpublished Torres Strait records.
References
AVH [Australia’s Virtual Herbarium]. 2015. Atlas of Living Australia [Accessed 20 May 2015].
<http://www.avh.ala.org.au/occurrences/search?q=Isid%3Aurn%3Alsid%3A biodiversity.org.au
%3Aapni.taxon%3A684717&qc=data_hub_uid:dh2&fq=species:%22Derris%20trifoliata%22#
tab_mapView>
BISA, D. 2013. New locations of butterflies from northern Arnhem Land, Northern Territory.
Northern Territory Naturalist 24: 2-13.
BRABY, M.F. 2000. Butterflies of Australia: their identification, biology and distribution.
CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne; xxvii + 976 pp.
COMMON, I.F.B. and WATERHOUSE, D.F. 1981. Butterflies of Australia. Revised edition.
Angus & Robertson, Sydney; xiv + 682 pp.
EDWARDS, E.D., NEWLAND, J. and REGAN, L. 2001. Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea,
Papilionoidea. /n Wells, A.A. and Houston, W.W.K. (eds), Zoological Catalogue of Australia.
Vol. 31.6. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne.
EVANS, W.H. 1949. A catalogue of the Hesperiidae from Europe, Asia, and Australia in the
British Museum (Natural History). British Museum (Natural History), London; xix + 502 pp, 53
pls.
EVANS, W.H. 1958. A new sub-species of Hasora hurama Butler (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae).
Natural History Rennell Island, British Solomon Islands 2: 113, 1 pl.
MEYER, C.E., WEIR, R.P. and WILSON, D.N. 2006. Butterfly (Lepidoptera) records from the
Darwin region, Northern Territory. Australian Entomologist 33: 9-22.
PARSONS, M. 1998. The butterflies of Papua New Guinea. Their systematics and biology.
Academic Press, London; xvi + 736 pp, 162 pls.
PETERS, J.V. Notes on the distribution of Australian Hesperioidea and Papilionoidea.
Australian Zoologist 15: 178-184.
TENNENT, W.J. 2002. Butterflies of the Solomon Islands. Systematics and biogeography.
Storm Entomological Publications, Dereham, Norfolk; xxiii + 413 pp.
142 Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
Appendix 1. Collection and external character data for Hasora hurama
hurama specimens examined.
No. = Voucher specimen number; A = Forewing length (mm); B = Wingspan (mm),
measured apex to apex; C = Hindwing underside band width (between veins CuA,
and M3); Y = yes; N = no; CEMC = CE Meyer Collection; SSBC = SS Brown
Collection, RPWC = RP Weir Collection. Illustrated male (Figs 13-14) = Table 1, No.
3. Illustrated female (Figs 15-16) = Table 2, No. 5.
Table 1. Male specimens of Hasora hurama hurama examined.
No. Collection data Reared A B C
(Y/N)
Cooktown, N QLD 4 111.1987 CEMC Y 22.55 42.0 4.5
Quarantine Bay via 19.vi.2008 CEMC Y 22.0 41.0 45
Cooktown, QLD
3 Cooktown, QLD 11.11.2009 CEMC Y 220 420 5.0
4 Cooktown, QLD 18.11.2009 CEMC Y 23.0 ` 42.0 5.0
5 Cooktown, QLD 18.11.2009 CEMC Y 21.5 40.5 4.5
6 Cooya Beach via Port 29.1.2009 CEMC N 240 440 5.0
Douglas, QLD
7 Cooya Beach via Port 29.1.2009 CEMC N 22.0 40.0 4.0
Douglas, QLD
8 Scott Street, Cairns, 30.1.2009 CEMC Y 22.0 41.0 4.0
QLD
9 Scott Street, Cairns, 30.1.2009 CEMC Y 21.5 39.0 4.0
QLD
10 ` Lockerbie, QLD 5-9.v.2003 RPWC N 23.0 ` 42.0 4.4
11 Quarantine Bay, QLD 24.v1.2006 RPWC Y 22.0 39.0 4.0
12 ` Ingham, QLD (Figured ` 27.111.1987 SSBC Y 240 42.0 5.0
in Braby 2000)
13 Ingham, QLD 27.i11.1987 SSBC Y 23.0 43.0 5.0
14 ` Ingham, QLD 27.111.1987 SSBC Y 25.0 45.0 6.0
15 Lockerbie Scrub, Cape 10.v.2003 SSBC N 25.5 46.0 5.2
York QLD
16 Quarantine Bay, 16.vi.2006 SSBC Y 23.0 43.0 5.0
Cooktown, QLD
17 Quarantine Bay, 25.v1i.2006 SSBC Y 23.0 41.0 5.0
Cooktown, QLD
Average sizes (n = 17): 22.9 41.9 4.7
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
Table 2. Female specimens of Hasora hurama hurama examined.
No.
Nn B L N =e
O won AD
Collection data
Cooktown, QLD
Cooktown, QLD
Cooktown, QLD
Quarantine Bay via
Cooktown, QLD
Quarantine Bay via
Cooktown, QLD
Cooktown, N. QLD
Cooktown, QLD
Cooktown, QLD
Scott Street, Cairns,
QLD
Scott Street, Cairns,
QLD
Scott Street, Cairns,
QLD
Scott Street, Cairns,
QLD
Scott Street, Cairns,
QLD
Cooktown, QLD
Quarantine Bay, QLD
Quarantine Bay, QLD
Quarantine Bay,
Cooktown, QLD
Quarantine Bay,
Cooktown, QLD
Ingham, QLD
Ingham, QLD
Ingham, QLD
Ingham, QLD
Average sizes (n = 22):
22.ix.1997
23.1x.1997
3.x. 1997
16.vi.2006
20.vi.2006
4 111.2007
12.11.2009
17.11.2009
30.1.2013
30.1.2013
30.1.2013
30.1.2013
3.11.2013
4.xi.1987
24.vi.2006
1.v11.2006
28.1.2007
28.1.2007
17.111.1987
17.111.1987
17.111.1987
17.111.1987
CEMC
CEMC
CEMC
CEMC
CEMC
CEMC
CEMC
CEMC
CEMC
CEMC
CEMC
CEMC
CEMC
RPWC
RPWC
RPWC
SSBC
SSBC
SSBC
SSBC
SSBC
SSBC
Reared
(Y/N)
Y
A
143
144 Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
Appendix 2. Collection and external character data for types of Hasora
hurama territorialis subsp. n. used for the description of the subspecies.
No. = Voucher specimen number; R’red or R’d = Reared; A = Forewing length
(mm); B = Wingspan (mm), measured apex to apex; C = Hindwing underside band
width (between veins CuA, and M3); Y = yes; N = no; ANIC = Australian National
Insect Collection; CEMC = CE Meyer Collection; DALC = DA Lane Collection;
NTMC = Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territory Collection, Darwin;
MFBC = MF Braby Collection, RPWC = RP Weir Collection; SSBC = SS Brown
Collection. Illustrated holotype male (Figs 17-18) = Table 1, No. 5. Illustrated
paratype female (Figs 19-20) = Table 2, No. 4.
Table 3. Male specimens of Hasora hurama territorialis subsp. n.
No. Collection data R’red A B C
(Y/N)
1 Buffalo Creek, NT 3.111.1992 CEMC N 21.0 390 2.5
2 Adelaide River, NT 22.13.1992 CEMC Y 210 390 25
3 Adelaide River, NT 23.1x.1992 CEMC Y 195 39.0 2.5
4 Adelaide River, NT 24.1x.1992 CEMC Y 20.0 355 2.0
5 Adelaide River, NT 4.11.1994 ANIC Y 21.0 375 2.5
(Figs 17-18)
6 Adelaide River, NT 5.11.1994 CEMC Y 20.0 340 2.5
7 Adelaide River Bridge on 23.iv.1995 CEMC Y 21.0 365 2.0
Arnhem Hwy, NT
8 Adelaide River Bridge on 6.1x.1998 CEMC Y 20.0 360 2.0
Arnhem Hwy, NT
9 Adelaide River hunting 10.iv.2009 CEMC Y 21.5 380 2.0
reserve, Arnhem Hwy via
Darwin, NT
10 Adelaide River Bridge 3.v.2013 CEMC Y 21.5 385 20
environs, Arnhem Hwy,
NT
11 Adelaide River Bridge 14.v.2013 CEMC Y 20.5 385 30
environs, Arnhem Hwy,
NT
12 Beatrice Hill, NT 1.111.2000 RPWC Y 20.0 350 20
13 Beatrice Hill, NT 1.111.2000 RPWC Y 20.5 355 2.0
14 Beatrice Hill, NT 1.111.2000 RPWC Y 22.0 370 2.5
15 Beatrice Hill, NT 1.111.2000 RPWC Y 225 385 25
16 Beatrice Hill, NT 1 111.2000 RPWC Y 215. 395, 20
17 Adelaide River, NT 6.11.2008 RPWC ¥ 20.0 345 2.0
18 Adelaide River, NT 5.1v.2009 RPWC Y 21.5 375 2.0
19 Fogg Dam, NT 22.iv.1991 SSBC N 215 420 3.5
20 Fogg Dam, NT 22.iv.1991 SSBC N 215 41.5 3.2
21 Beatrice Hill (Window 14.11.2009 NTMC N 221 359 28
on the Wetlands Visitor
Centre), Adelaide River
floodplain, NT
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
No. Collection data
22 12.64956°S, 131.31851°E 17.1.2009
Beatrice Hill, NT
23 12.64956°S, 131.31851°E 17.1.2010
Beatrice Hill, NT
24 ` 12.64956°S, 131.31851°E 23.1.2010
Beatrice Hill, NT (MFBC
00116)
25 12°39°36”S, 131°20°11”E 17.x1.2010
Adelaide River crssng,
Arnhem Hwy, NT
26 =12°39°36”S, 131920” 11”E 17.x1.2010
Adelaide River crssng,
Arnhem Hwy, NT (MFBC
00582)
27 129%39'36”S, 131920? 11”E 18.x1.2010
Adelaide River crssng,
Arnhem Hwy, NT (MFBC
00583)
28 12°3936”S, 131220 11”E 21.1x.2010
Adelaide River crssng,
Arnhem Hwy, NT (MFBC
00584)
29 12939*36”S, 131220 11”E 7.xii.2012
Adelaide River crossing,
Arnhem Hwy, NT (MFBC
00824)
30 12°3936”S, 131920 11”E 12.vii.2013
Adelaide River crossing,
Arnhem Hwy, NT (MFBC
00582)
31 12.40329°S, 132.96107°E 13.x.2013
East Alligator, near Ubirr,
Kakadu NP, NT (MFBC
00896)
32 12.40329°S, 132.96107°E 16.x.2013
East Alligator, near Ubirr,
Kakadu NP, NT (MFBC
00896)
33 Blyth River' 21.ix.1968
Average sizes (n = 32):
MFBC
MFBC
MFBC
MFBC
MFBC
MFBC
MFBC
MFBC
MFBC
MFBC
MFBC
AMC
21.6
21.3
20.5
20.0
19.3
21.1
20.2
20.9
37.8
39.3
37.2
36.8
35.1
37.5
38.3
36.6
37.6
Note 1: specimen measurement data not used in calculation of average sizes.
145
2.2
2.2
2.3
2.2
2.0
1.7
1.8
2.0
2.9
2.3
146
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
Table 4. Female specimens of Hasora hurama territorialis subsp. n.
No.
A UNS
Collection data
Fogg Dam, NT
Fogg Dam, NT
Fogg Dam, NT
Adelaide River, NT
(Figs 19-20)
Adelaide River, NT
Adelaide River Bridge on
Arnhem Hwy, NT
Adelaide River Bridge on
Arnhem Hwy, NT
Adelaide River Bridge on
Arnhem Hwy, NT
Adelaide River Bridge on
Arnhem Hwy, NT
Adelaide River Bridge
environs, Arnhem Hwy, NT
Adelaide River Bridge
environs, Arnhem Hwy, NT
Adelaide River Bridge
environs, Arnhem Hwy, NT
Adelaide River, NT
Fogg Dam, NT
Fogg Dam, NT
Berrimah Research
Farm, NT
Berrimah Research
Farm, NT
Berrimah Research
Farm, NT
10 km East, Adelaide
River, NT
Beatrice Hill, NT
Beatrice Hill, NT
Beatrice Hill, NT
Adelaide River, NT
Adelaide River, NT
Adelaide River, NT
Fogg Dam, NT
Fogg Dam, NT
Fogg Dam, NT
Fogg Dam, NT
Adelaide River, NT
Adelaide River, 10 km NE
on Arnhem Hwy, NT
22.1v.1991
22.1v.1991
22.1v.1991
24.13.1992
10.11.1994
16.1v.1995
18.1v.1995
18.1v.1995
18.1x.1998
13.v.2013
14.v.2013
15.v.2013
8.v.1989
22.1v.1991
22.1v.1991
8.1v.1994
8.1v.1994
15.1v.1994
7.v111.1996
1.111.2000
1.111.2000
1.111.2000
5.iv.2009
5.111.2013
5.111.2013
22.1v.1991
22.1v.1991
22.1v.1991
22.1v.1991
2.v.1995
9.v.1991
CEMC
CEMC
CEMC
CEMC
CEMC
CEMC
CEMC
CEMC
CEMC
CEMC
CEMC
CEMC
RPWC
RPWC
RPWC
RPWC
RPWC
RPWC
RPWC
RPWC
RPWC
RPWC
RPWC
RPWC
RPWC
SSBC
SSBC
SSBC
SSBC
DALC
NTMC
R'd
qe Zaz
ZZ ZZ
Z
ZZZ Z ZKKK
A
22.0
21.0
22.0
21.0
21.0
20.0
20.5
20.5
20.0
21.0
20.0
21.0
22.0
22.5
22.5
23.0
21.5
23.0
21.5
22.0
22.0
22.0
21.0
19.0
21.0
23.0
21.0
22.0
22.5
21.2
22.3
B
38.5
38.5
39.0
39.0
39.0
35.0
35.5
35.5
36.0
38.0
36.0
38.0
39.0
38.0
38.5
41.5
35.0
40.0
36.0
38.5
37.0
38.5
36.5
33.0
37.0
44.0
40.0
40.2
42.5
37.0
41.2
C
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
3.0
3.0
2.0
3.0
2.0
3.0
2.5
3.0
3.0
2.0
25
3.5
3.0
3.0
3.5
2.1
3.0
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
No.
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
4]
42
43
44
45
Collection data
12.64956°S 131.31851°E
Beatrice Hill, NT (MFBC
00428)
12939”36”S 131°20°11”E
Adelaide River crssng,
Arnhem Hwy, NT (MFBC
00585)
12°39°36”S 131220? 11”E
Adelaide River crssng,
Arnhem Hwy, NT (MFBC
00586)
12°39°36”S 131°20°11”E
Adelaide River crssng,
Arnhem Hwy, NT
12°39°36”S 131°20°11”E
Adelaide River crssng,
Arnhem Hwy, NT (MFBC
00587)
12°39°36”S 131°20°11”E
Adelaide River crssng,
Arnhem Hwy, NT (MFBC
00588)
12°39°36"S 131°20°11”E
Adelaide River crssng,
Arnhem Hwy, NT (MFBC
00589)
12°39°36"S, 131920 11”E
Adelaide River crossing,
Arnhem Hwy, NT
12.40329°S, 132.96107°E
East Alligator, near Ubirr,
Kakadu NP, NT
12.40329°S 132.96107°E
East Alligator, near Ubirr,
Kakadu NP, NT
12.40329°S 132.96107°E
East Alligator, near Ubirr,
Kakadu NP, NT
12.40329°S 132.96107°E
East Alligator, near Ubirr,
Kakadu NP, NT (MFBC
00897)
Fogg Dam, NT
Adelaide River'
Average sizes (n = 44):
17.1.2019
15.x1.2010
17.xi.2010
17.x1.2010
18.x1.2010
19.x1.2010
27.x1.2010
16.v11.2013
20.x.2013
28.x.2013
28.x.2013
30.x.2013
22.iv.1991
13.1.1962
MFBC
MFBC
MFBC
MFBC
MFBC
MFBC
MFBC
MFBC
MFBC
MFBC
MFBC
MFBC
ANIC
AMC
R’d
19.9
20.9
21.9
19.9
20.9
20.2
21.4
19.4
19.7
20.7
20.3
20.5
22.3
21.2
36.8
39.4
40.6
34.9
38.7
37.5
38.9
36.1
35.7
37.4
36.5
36.5
37.9
Note 1: specimen measurement data not used in calculation of average sizes.
147
2.2
2.7
2.8
2.5
XT]
2.2
2.0
2.0
2.2
2.3
1.7
2.0
2.5
2.6
148 Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
MISCELLANEOUS NOTES
The following notes are abstracted from the News Bulletin of the
Entomological Society of Queensland and appeared, with illustrations, in the
Volumes and Parts indicated.
Anthene lycaenoides godeffroyi (Semper) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). — Three worn
females were collected on 24 January 2015 in southern Queensland, at two different
locations separated by about 10 km, approximately 800 km south of the previous
southern recorded limit [Cannonvale near Airlie Beach]. Several others were seen at
close quarters and positively identified but not collected.
Two specimens were collected and several others identified 5 km east of Pomona and
another collected 2 km south of Cooroy. All specimens seen or collected were
females. The Pomona specimens were all active late morning, flying around and
landing on a flowering Albizia julibrissin (Mimosaceae), a recorded food plant for this
species. The specimens appeared to be coming from a northerly direction. No further
specimens were encountered until 30 January 2015, when a further female was
collected and released at the Pomona site.
All specimens collected have a prominent white patch on the forewing upperside and
appear typical of specimens from Townsville and Cairns.
While A. lycaenoides godeffroyi is a relatively strong flier for a lycaenid, it is
considered unlikely that these specimens originated from within its previously known
range, given the significant distance involved. It appears more likely that the range of
this species has been expanding incrementally without previous detection.
MAYO, R. — Interesting new locations for Anthene lycaenoides godeffroyi (Semper)
in southern Queensland. — Volume 42(10): 189 (February 2015).
Hypolimnas alimena lamina Fruhstorfer (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) — A single
female was observed 5 km east of Pomona on 20 April 2015. This is the first
specimen observed in the area since moving there in 2002. It was of the ‘brown form’
and appeared to be in relatively fresh condition.
Junonia orithya albicincta Butler (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) — Three males were
observed 5 km east of Pomona on separate single occasions, between 6 and 20 April
2015. These are the first specimens observed in the area since moving there in 2002.
All flew rapidly close to the ground without stopping and appeared to be travelling in
a generally southern direction. Also encountered regularly over the past decade near
Imbil, where it appears to be established with males exhibiting a rapid low flight but
often alighting on the ground (unlike the Pomona specimens).
Anthene lycaenoides godeffroyi (Semper) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). — A further
female was observed and positively identified at Buderim on 3 May 2015.
MAYO, R. — Recent observations of butterfly species rarely encountered in southern
Queensland. — Volume 43(3): 50 (May 2015).
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3): 149-159 149
ADDITIONAL POLYMORPHISM IN FEMALES OF
HYPOLIMNAS BOLINA PALLESCENS (BUTLER)
(LEPIDOPTERA: NYMPHALIDAE) FROM THE ISLANDS
OF TAVEUNI AND VANUA LEVU, FIJI
R.B. LACHLAN
Entomology Department, Australian Museum, 6 College St, Sydney, NSW 2010
Abstract
Numerous additional polymorphic Hypolimnas bolina pallescens (Butler, 1874) female forms
were collected on the central west coast of Taveuni during May 1982 and from a small area
approximately 5 km southwest of Savusavu on the south central coast of Vanua Levu, Fiji,
during November-December 2014. Their polymorphism is discussed and the morphs not
previously collected on Viti Levu by the author are illustrated.
Introduction
In Fiji, Hypolimnas bolina pallescens (Butler) is the subspecies of H. bolina
(L.) assigned to this region of the Pacific. Adults of H. bolina are sexually
dimorphic but the females in Fiji, Samoa and Guam (the largest island in
Micronesia, in the Western Pacific), in particular, display an extraordinary
range of polymorphism apparently not seen to the same degree anywhere else
across its very extensive range (Clark and Sheppard 1975).
The primary purpose of this paper is to illustrate additional female morphs
not previously collected and illustrated (Lachlan 2014) from Fiji. Once again,
all specimens collected on both islands were within small areas of forest and
coconut plantations measuring just a few hectares in area.
Hypolimnas bolina pallescens adults are generally widespread and locally
common in Fiji and can best be found along forest trails, clearings and
roadsides where they usually fly close to the ground and often rest on low
vegetation. The author has noted that, if disturbed, females will often fly for a
short period and look for a resting place. Having collected and examined 244
females from three different islands in Fiji, it is clear that, while most morphs
can be placed with reasonable accuracy into the four main forms given by
Poulton (1924) to describe the four basic phenotypes, placing the large
number of intermediate morphs the author has collected into the three
additional intermediate forms given by Clark and Sheppard (1975) has
proved, with many morphs, much more difficult and rather subjective at
times. There are also a small number of uniquely coloured and patterned
morphs that are difficult to place in any of the seven current groupings.
Surveys
The brief survey on the central west coast of the island of Taveuni (the third
largest island in Fiji) was done from 11 to 20 May 1982. Being at the end of
the wet season, most specimens collected showed signs of wear and no fresh
Specimens were taken. An intensive survey was also conducted near
Savusavu on the south central coast of Vanua Levu, the second largest island
150 Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
in Fiji, from 30 November to 13 December 2014. Unfortunately, most days
were overcast with rain periods and only intermittent hours of sunshine. H. b.
pallescens adults were commonly encountered not only along the forest trails
but also in a nearby coconut plantation, where they flew close to the ground
generally landing frequently. Good rains had fallen about two weeks prior to
the commencement of the survey and most specimens collected and observed
showed wear and wing damage, indicating they had been on the wing for
some time. As further rain fell regularly during the survey period more fresh
specimens appeared. Numerous morphs not taken by the author earlier in
2014 on Viti Levu were collected. Vanua Levu is approximately 63 km NE
of Viti Levu (the main island in Fiji) while Taveuni is just 8 km SE of the
eastern side of Vanua Levu.
Hypolimnas bolina pallescens (Butler, 1874)
(Figs 1-22)
Material examined. Taveuni survey: 14 GG, 25 99, FIJI: Central west coast of
Taveuni Island, between 11-20.v.1982, R.B. Lachlan. (All in RBL collection).
Vanua Levu survey: 4 SZ, 112 9 Q, FIJI: 5 km SW of Savusavu, south central coast
of Vanua Levu, 16°48°58”S, 179°17°20”E, between 30.x1.-13.x11.2014, R.B. Lachlan.
(All in RBL collection).
The various female forms collected during both surveys and their numbers
are recorded in Table 1. As the Taveuni survey was brief and done over 30
years ago, an accurate comparative analysis of any differences between the
two islands is not worthwhile, other than to note that no morphs of the forms
euploeoides-pallescens or pallescens were collected on Taveuni.
Specimen sizes. All measurements are set wingspans. The largest from
Taveuni was 82 mm, the smallest was 68 mm and the average (n = 25) was
73.4 mm. The largest from Vanua Levu was 83 mm (this is very large for the
species) and the smallest was 61 mm.
Table 1. Results for Hypolimnas bolina pallescens females from Taveuni and
Savusavu, Vanua Levu.
Form Numbers collected / %
Taveuni Savusavu, Vanua Levu
euploeoides 6 / 24 28 / 25
euploeoides-naresi 6 / 24 10/9
naresi 3/12 15 /13.3
euploeoides-nerina 3/12 43 / 38.4
nerina 7/28 6/5.3
euploeoides-pallescens 0/0 1/0.8
pallescens 0/0 9/8
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3) 151
Figs 1-3. Females of Hypolimnas bolina from Fiji: f. naresi.
152 Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
6
Figs 4-6. Females of Hypolimnas bolina from Fiji: f. euploeoides-nerina.
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3) 153
Figs 7-9. Females of Hypolimnas bolina from Fiji: f. euploeoides-nerina.
154 Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
Figs 10-12. Females of Hypolimnas bolina from Fiji: f. euploeoides-nerina.
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3) 155
15
Figs 13-15. Females of Hypolimnas bolina from Fiji: f. euploeoides-nerina.
156 Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
16
I7
18
Figs 16-18. Females of Hypolimnas bolina from Fiji: (16-17) f. euploeoides-nerina;
(18) f. euploeoides-pallescens.
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3) 157
20
SS SS
Ë ` \ i
O
21 4
Figs 19-21. Females of Hypolimnas bolina from Fiji: f. pallescens.
158 Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
Fig 22. Female of Hypolimnas bolina from Fiji: f. pallescens.
Discussion
Having now examined 244 female H. b. pallescens adults as a result of field
work conducted in Fiji over a number of years, it has become increasingly
obvious to the author that they display such an astonishing degree of
polymorphism that it was described by Vane-Wright et al. (1977) as being
quasi-continuous — without ceasing. Given that in many parts of the Pacific
this is the case, relying on changes in individual wing patterns and colours to
describe subspecies or particular forms is not possible as there are so many
intermediates between the four basic phenotypes. Vane-Wright and Tennent
(2011) correctly noted that, in the case of Junonia villida (Fabricius),
‘systematists working from short series collected during rare visits to remote
islands could be misled into thinking that they were dealing with stable,
locally adapted subpopulations worthy of subspecific status.’ The same must
also be said for the past use of form names that have been applied to various
H. bolina females.
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to John Tennent (Natural History Museum, London) for
providing important reference material. I would also like to thank Russel Cox
(Entomology Department, Australian Museum, Sydney) for his help in
producing the digital images used in the plates.
References
CLARK, C.[A.] and SHEPPARD, P.M. 1975. The genetics of the mimetic butterfly Hypolimnas
bolina (L.). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 272: 229-265.
Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3) 159
LACHLAN, R.B. 2014. Extreme polymorphism in Hypolimnas bolina (Linnaeus) (Lepidoptera:
Nymphalidae) females from a single locality on the southwestern coral coast of Viti Levu, Fiji.
Australian Entomologist 41(4): 233-263.
POULTON, E.B. 1924. Mimicry in the butterflies of Fiji considered in relation to the Euploeine
and Danaine invasions of Polynesia and to the female forms of Hypolimnas bolina L. in the
Pacific (with an appendix on the numerical aspect of reciprocal mimicry (diaposematic
resemblance) by H.H. Turner). Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 1923. 564-
691, 23 pls.
VANE-WRIGHT, R.I. and TENNENT, W.J. 2011. Colour and size variation in Junonia villida
(Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae): subspecies or phenotypic plasticity? Systematics and Biodiversity
9(4): 289-305.
VANE-WRIGHT, R.I., ACKERY, P.R. and SMILES, R.L. 1977. The polymorphism, mimicry,
and host plant relationships of Hypolimnas butterflies. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
9: 285-297.
160 Australian Entomologist, 2015, 42 (3)
NEW PUBLICATIONS
ASHMAN, L.G., OBERPRIELER, R.G. and SLIPINSKI, A.
2015. Rhopalomma stefaniae gen. et sp. n., the first ommatid beetle from the Upper Jurassic in
Australia (Coleoptera: Archostemata: Ommatidae). Zootaxa 3980(1): 136-142.
BEN-DOV, Y.
2015. Description of a new species of Odonaspis Leonard (Hemiptera: Coccomorpha:
Diaspididae) from Australia. Zootaxa 3980(3): 447-449.
CRANSTON, P.S. and KROSCH, M.N.
2015. Nomenclatural corrections to Australian species of Cricotopus (Wulp) (Diptera;
Chironomidae). Zootaxa 3980(2): 298-300.
EWART, A., POPPLE, L.W. and MARSHALL, D.C.
2015. New species of Simona Moulds, 2012 and Chelapsalta Moulds, 2012 cicadas (Cicadidae:
Cicadettinae: Cicadettini) from Australia: comparative morphology, songs, behaviour and
distributions. Zootaxa 4001(1): 1-65.
FIKACEK, M. and WATTS, C.HLS.
2015. Notes on the Australian Anacaenini (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae): description of male of
Phelea breviceps Hansen and unravelling the identity of Crenitis neogallica Gentili
Zootaxa 3980(3): 427-434.
FORTEATH, G.N.R., IRERI, P. and OSBORN, A.W.
2015. A new species of Sisyra Burmeister 1939 (Neuroptera: Sisyridae) from Four Springs lake
and Wadley’s Dam, northern Tasmania. Austral Entomology 54: 217-220.
HENDRICH, L. and BALKE, M.
2015. Review of the genus Sekaliporus Watts, 1997 with description of a new species from
northern Australia (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae, Hydroporinae). Zootaxa 3981(1): 107-116.
HILL, L.
2015. Three new genera of Schizopteridae from Australia with description of six new species
(Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Schizopteridae). Zootaxa 3990(1): 73-96.
KOLESIK, P.
2015. A review of gall midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae: Cecidomyiinae) of Australia and Papua
New Guinea: morphology, biology, classification and key to adults. Austral Entomology
54: 127-148.
NAMYATOVA, A.A. and CASSIS, G.
2015. Revision of the Australian endemic plant bug genus Volkelius Distant, 1904 (Insecta:
Heteroptera: Miridae: Bryocorinae). Austral Entomology 54: 180-190.
SCHUH, R., STYS, P., CASSIS, G., LEHNERT, M., SWANSON, D. and BRICE, T.
2015. New genera and species of Plokiophilidae from Australia, Fiji and southeast Asia with a
revised classification of the family (Insecta: Heteroptera: Cimicoidea). American Museum
Novitates 3825: 1-15.
ŻABKA, M. and PATOLETA, B.M.
2015. New species of Tauala Wanless, 1988 from Australia (Araneae: Salticidae: Astioida:;
Astiae), with a redefinition of the genus. Zootaxa 4000(5): 501-517.
ZWICK, P.
2015. Australian Marsh Beetles (Coleoptera: Scirtidae). 7. Genus Nothocyphon, new genus.
Zootaxa 3981(3): 301-359.
2015. Australian Marsh Beetles (Coleoptera: Scirtidae). 8. The new genera Cygnocyphon,
Eximiocyphon, Paracyphon, Leptocyphon, Tectocyphon, and additions to Contacyphon de
Gozis, Nanocyphon Zwick and Eurycyphon Watts. Zootaxa 3981(4): 451-490.
THE molog
Entomologist
Volume 42, Part 3, 21 September 20 15
BRABY, M.F.
First record of Petrelaea tombugensis (Röber) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) from
Western Australia
BROWN, S.S., MEYER, C.E., WEIR, R.P. AND MILLER, C.G.
Tagiades nestus korela Mabille, 1891 (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Pyrginae) from Mer Island,
Torres Strait, Queensland
HANCOCK, D.L.
A review of the tree, fig and fruit-infesting flies of the Aethiothemara, Diarrhegma, Dirioxa
and Themaroides groups of genera (Diptera: Tephritidae: Acanthonevrini)
LACHLAN, R.B.
Additional polymorphism in females of Hypolimnas bolina pallescens (Butler) (Lepidoptera:
Nymphalidae) from the islands of Taveuni and Vanua Leyu, Fiji
MEYER, C.E., WEIR, R.P. AND BROWN, S.S.
A new subspecies of Hasora hurama (Butler, 1870) (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Coeliadinae)
from the Northern Territory, Australia
MONTEITH, G.B.
Two new records of Australian Triatoma Laporte (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae)
MISCELLANEOUS NOTES
NEW PUBLICATIONS
ISSN 1320 6133