ISSN 1981-8114

MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDI

CIÊNCIAS

NATURAIS

V. 6 n. 1 janeiro/abríl de 2011

Avifauna of Northern Pará

Guiana Region, Brazíl

cm

2 3 4

5 6 7 8 9

SciELO

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Pithys albifrons (em destaque)

Hylophylax naevius

Celeus elegans

Galbulaalbirostris

5 6 7

I SciELO

IMAGENS DA CAPA

Pithys albifrons

(em destaque)

H/lophylax naevius

Celeus elegans

Galbula albirostris

Fotos: Adriano

Gambarini

BOLETIM DO MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDl.

CIÊNCIAS NATURAIS (ISSN 1981-8114)

o Boletim do Museu Paraense de História Natural e Ethnographiafoi criado por Emílio

Goeldi e o primeiro fascículo surgiu em 1894, O atual Boletim é sucedâneo daquele.

The Boletim do Museu Paraense de História Natural e Ethnographia was created by

Emilio Goeldi, and the first number was issued in 1894, The present one is the

successor to this publication.

EDITOR CIENTÍFICO

Hilton Tulio Costi

EDITORES ASSOCIADOS

Alexandre Aleixo

Ana Cristina Andrade de Aguiar Dias

Anna Luiza Ilkiu Borges

José de Sousa e Silva Júnior (Cazuza)

Maria Inês Feijó Ramos

Marinus S. Hoogmoed

Toby Gardner

CONSELHO EDITORIAL CIENTÍFICO

Ana Maria Giuiietti - Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana - Feira de Santana - Brasil

Augusto Shinya Abe - Universidade Estadual Paulista - Rio Claro - Brasil

Carlos Afonso Nobre - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisa Espacial - Cachoeira Paulista - Brasil

Douglas C. Daly - New York Botanical Garden - New York - USA

Hans ter Steege - Utrecht University - Utrecht - Netherlands

Ima Célia Guimarães Vieira - Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi - Belém - Brasil

John Bates - Reld Museum of Natural History - Chicago - USA

José Maria Cardoso da Silva - Conservação Internacional - Belém - Brasil

Laurent Polidori - TEcole Supérieure des Géomètres Topographes - Le Mans - França

Miguel Trefaut Rodrigues - Universidade de São Paulo - São Paulo - Brasil

Nelson Papavero - Museu de Zoologia - Universidade de São Paulo - São Paulo - Brasil

Peter Mann de Toledo - Instituto de Desenvolvimento Econômico, Social e Ambiental do Pará - Belém - Brasil

Roberto DalFAgnol - Universidade Federal do Pará - Belém - Brasil

Rui Cerqueira - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - Rio de Janeiro - Brasil

VYiIliam Woods - University of Kansas - Lawrence - USA

NÚCLEO EDITORIAL

Editora executiva

Andréa Sanjad

Assistente editorial

Rafaele Lima

Projeto gráfico, editoração e capa

Elaynia Ono

Versão eletrônica

Elaynia Ono

Normalização

Núcleo Editorial Boletim

Apoio administrativo

Regina Noronha

.SciELO

ENDEREÇO PARA CORRESPONDÊNCIA:

Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi

Núcleo Editorial - Boletim do Museu Paraense Emflio Goeldi

Av. Magalhães Barata, 376

São Braz - CEP 66040-170

Belém - PA - Brasil

Telefone: 55-91-3182-3246

Fax: 55-91-3249-6373

E-mail: boletim@museu-goeldi.br

VERSÃO ONLINE DA REVISTA:

http:/Avww. museu-goeldi . br/editora

http:/Avww. portalperiodicos. iec. pa.gov. br

SUBMISSÃO DE TRABALHOS:

boletim. naturais@museu-goeldi. br

AQUISIÇÃO:

Permuta: mgdoc@museu-goeldi.br

Venda: livraria@museu-goeldi.br

INDEXADORES

CAB Abstracts

IBSS - International Bibliography of the Social Sciences

LATINDEX - Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para

Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, Espana y Portugal

Zoological Record

Não é permitida a reprodução parcial ou total de artigos ou notas

publicadas, sob nenhuma forma ou técnica, sem a prévia autorização

do editor. Rcam isentas as cópias para uso pessoal e interno, desde

que não destinadas a fins promocionais ou comerciais. As opiniões

e considerações emitidas nos artigos assinados são de inteira

responsabilidade dos autores, e não refletem necessariamente a

posição dos editores ou da instituição responsável pela publicação.

Dados Internacionais de Catalogação na Publicação CIP

Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Naturais. 2011. - Belém: MPEG. 2011. v. 6 n. 1.. v. il.

Semestral: 1984-2002

Interrompida: 2003-2004

Quadrimestral a partir do v. 1, 2005.

Tttubs anteriores; Boletim Museu Ftiraense de História Natural e Ethnographia 1894-98; Boletim Museu Fàraense de História Natural e Ethnographia (Museu

Goeldi) 1902; Boletim do Museu Goeldi (Museu Fãraense)de História Natural e Ethnographia 1906-1914; Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi de

História Natural e Etnografia 1933; Boletim do Museu ftraense Emilio Goeldi 1949-2002, série Zoologia, série Botânica e série Ciências da lèrra; Boletim

do Museu Fcinaense Emílio Goeldi, série Ciências Naturais, em 2005. A partir de 2006, Boletim do Museu FLraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Naturais.

ISSN 1981-8114

1. Ciências Naturais. 2. Zoologia. 3. Avifauna. 4. Herpetologia. 5, Biogeografia. I. Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi.

CDD-21^ed. 500

CAPES

Ministério da

Educação

Ministério da

Ciência e Tecnoiogia

Ü^IL

(•AtS RICO C RAIt «CM RORREZA

.-A?

■ÍLffls

MUSEU PARAENSE EMIUO GOELDI

cm

SciELO

13 14 15 16 17 If

19 20 21

CARTA DO EDITOR

No primeiro número de 2011 do Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Naturais são

publicados dois novos trabalhos da coleção Notas sobre os vertebrados do norte do Pará, Brasil: uma parte

esquecida da Região das Guianas. Os artigos desta coleção foram originalmente escritos em inglês, língua

franca da ciência, na expectativa de torná-los, e também ao periódico do Museu, mais facilmente acessíveis

aos pesquisadores internacionais. A repercussão do primeiro número da coleção, publicado no volume 5(1),

de 2010, foi favorável à revista, permitindo antever o interesse que a presente edição despertará. "Notes

on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: a forgotten part of the Guianan Region, II. Avifauna”, de autoria

de Alexandre Luis Padovan Aleixo, Fabíola Poletto, Maria de Fátima Cunha Lima, Marcelo Castro, Eduardo

Portes e Leonardo de Sousa Miranda, e "Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: a forgotten part

of the Cuianan Region, 111. A new species oi Microcaedlia (Amphibia: Cymnophiona: Caeciliidae)”, de autoria

de Adriano Oliveira Maciel e Marinus Steven Hoogmoed, são os artigos originais desse volume. No primeiro

trabalho, são relacionadas as 446 espécies registradas durante as atividades de campo realizadas entre janeiro

de 2008 e janeiro de 2009 na região norte do estado do Pará, denominada Calha Norte. O segundo trabalho

refere-se à descrição de uma nova espécie de Microcaedlia, registrada no município de Óbidos, estado do

Pará, na porção brasileira da região das Cuianas.

Neste número, a exemplo de nosso periódico-irmão, inauguramos a seção Memória, que abrigará textos

de divulgação de acervos ou seus componentes; de documentos relevantes, parcial ou integralmente transcritos,

ensaios biográficos, incluindo obituário ou memórias pessoais, e a descrição de tecnologias e/ou equipamentos

que auxiliam o trabalho de pesquisa. O primeiro texto desta seção foi escrito por Marinus Steven Hoogmoed,

Teresa Cristina Avila-Pires e Nelson Rodrigues Sanjad, abordando a carreira do prolífico cientista Osvaldo

Rodrigues da Cunha, pesquisador titular do Museu Paraense Emílio Coeldi, responsável pela implantação do

setor de herpetologia e da coleção herpetológica da instituição, recentemente falecido.

No primeiro número do ano, tradicionalmente, são anunciadas as mudanças editoriais. Neste ano,

além da implementação da seção Memória, buscaremos tornar o escopo editorial mais inclusivo, ampliando a

aceitação de trabalhos nas áreas de Ceologia, Ecologia e Conservação em atendimento à crescente demanda

de submissões. Essas mudanças são acompanhadas da necessária ampliação do quadro de Editores Associados.

Nesse sentido, convidamos o Dr, Toby Cardner, professor da Universidade de Cambridge, a assumir a tarefa

de Editor Associado das áreas de Ecologia e Conservação, a quem damos as boas vindas.

Registra-se também o agradecimento formal pela contribuição e empenho a dois Editores Associados,

Drs. Orlando Tobias Silveira (CZO/MPEC) e Izildinha de Souza Miranda (UFRA), que, por opção pessoal,

certamente atendendo às extensas demandas exigidas por suas atribuições profissionais, retiram-se da equipe

editorial. Somos profundamente reconhecidos pelo relevante auxílio que ambos trouxeram ao Boletim.

cm

SciELO

13 14 15 16 17 lí

19 20 21

Artigos

SciELO

Boi. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat., Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 11-65, jan.- abr, 2011

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil:

a forgotten part of the Guianan Region, II. Avifauna

Notas sobre os vertebrados do norte do Pará, Brasil;

uma parte esquecida da Região das Guianas, II. Avifauna

Alexandre AJeixo', Fabíola Poletto', Maria de Fátima Cunha Lima', Marcelo Castro', Eduardo Portes", Leonardo de Sousa Miranda"

'Museu Fáraense Emílio Goeldi

"Curso de Pós-graduação em Zoologia - Universidade Federal do Pará / Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi

Abstract: We carried out seven two-week long avifaunal inventories in five newly-established consen/ation unte spanning the entire 'Calha

Norte’ area, a portion of the Guiana Shield in the northern part ofthe State of Fárá, Brazil, befween January 2008 and January 2009.

Prior to our study, most of this part of Amazônia was regarded as virtually unsampled from an omithological perspective. Here, we

present an annotated check-list v/ith 446 species of birds recorded during the sunreys, including 62 species for which our records

represented significant range extensions, and hence are discussed in detail. The number of species recorded at each site varied

between 203 and 302, and was positively correlated with the local availability of steep altitudinal and vegetational (foresLsavanna

and seasonally-flooded/upland forest) gradients. The number of unique species recorded at each site varied between 2 and 27, and

reflected an interesting biogeographic pattem in Vvhich the Trombetas riverappears to separate distinct upland and white-sand forest

bird faunas on the Guiana Shield, a pattem also verified for the herpetofauna. Our results also showed that savannas represent a

very important component of the local biota, with enclaves harboring a typical bird feuna also distributed in similar habitats in nearby

Southern Guyana, Suriname, and the State of Amapá in Brazil. Altogether the five conservation unte surveyed harbour 74 bird

species of special interest for conservation (threatened, endemic, rare, range-restricted, and hunted species) and therefore play a

key role in the preservation of all main subsets of the heterogeneous bird feuna of the Guiana Shield.

Keywords: Amazônia. Biogeography. Birds. Conservation. Guiana Shield. Savanna.

Resumo: Entre janeiro de 2008 e janeiro de 2009, executamos sete inventários de avifauna com a duração de duas semanas cada em cinco

unidades de conservação estaduais estabelecidas recentemente na região da 'Calha Norte', uma porção do escudo guianense

no norte do estado do Fárá, Brasil. Antes deste esforço de campo, a maior parte desta região da Amazônia era considerada

virtualmente não amostrada omitologicamente. Apresentamos, neste artigo, uma lista comentada de 446 espécies registradas

durante os levantamentos supracitados, incluindo uma discussão pormenorizada para 62 espécies, cujos registros representaram .

importantes extensões de distribuição para a região da 'Calha Norte' no Fárá. O número de espécies registradas em cada uma das

sete localidades amostradas variou entre 203 e 302, sendo comelacionado positivamente com a disponibilidade local de gradientes

altitudinais e de ecótonos vegetadonais (floresta de terra firme/cerrado e floresta sazonalmente alagada/floresta de terra firme). O

número de espécies exclusivas em cada sítio variou entre 2 e 27, refletindo um interessante padrão biogeográfico, no qual o rio

Trombetas aparenta separar avifeunas distintas do escudo guianense ligadas aos ambientes de floresta de terra firme e campina/

campinarana, de modo análogo ao verificado para a herpetofauna. Os resultados também mostraram que o cerrado representa

um importante componente da biota local, contribuindo com um contingente único de espédes associadas a este ambiente e

também distribuídas em localidades vizinhas do sul da Guyana, Suriname e no estado do Amapá. Em conjunto, as cinco unidades

de consen/ação estudadas abrigam 74 espécies de aves de especial interesse para a conservação (ameaçadas, endêmicas, raras, de

distribuição restrita e de interesse cinegético), o que atesta a importância estratégica destas áreas para a presen/ação dos principais

conjuntos únicos de espécies da heterogênea avfeuna do escudo guianense.

Palavras-chave: Amazônia. Biogeografia. Avifauna. Conservação. Escudo das Guianas. Cerrado.

Como citar este artigo: ALEIXO, A,, F POLETTO, M. F C. LIMA, M. C. E. PORTES & L. S. MIRANDA, 2011. Notes on the Vertebrates of

northern Pará, Brazil: a forgotten part of the Guianan Region, II, Avifauna. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Naturais

6(1): 11-65.

Autor para correspondência: Alexandre Aleixo. Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Coordenação de Zoologia. Av. Perimetral, 1901 - Terra

Fime. Belém. PA, Brasil. CEP 66040-170 (aleixo@museu-goeldi.br).

Recebido em 15/05/2010

Aprovado em 10/03/2011

Responsabilidade editorial: Marinus Hoogmoed

í — rgõST —

11

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: (...) II, Avifauna

INTRODUCTION

The Guiana Shield is an ancient and distinct geological

formation in northeastern Amazónia roughly bounded

by the Negro/Orinoco River in the west, the Amazon

River in the south, and the Atlantic Ocean in the east,

spanning over the territories of Colombia, Venezuela,

Brazil, Guyana, Suriname, and French Guiana (Gibbs

& Barron, 1993). From a biogeographic standpoint,

the Guiana Shield represents an important area of

endemism for several biological groups, including birds

(Haffer, 1974; Cracraft, 1985; Stotz et a!., 1996; Silva

et al ., 2005).

Despite the fact that birds are likely the best

studied biological group occurring on the Guiana Shield

(Milensky et al., 2005), many knowledge gaps still

exist. Particularly, the eastern portion of the Guiana

Shield in the northern part of the State of Pará, Brazil

(known locally as ‘Calha Norte Paraense', hereafter

CNP), is perhaps the least known ornithologically in

the entire shield, While some parts of the Brazilian

Amazon regarded as poorly sampled during the 1990’s

have since then been explored in more detail (e.g., the

State of Tocantins, see Pacheco & Olmos, 2006), most

of the CNP has remained inaccessible to ornithologists

until now as a result of extreme isolation (Oren, 2001;

Aleixo, 2009). Tothis date, all bird surveys conducted on

the CNP relied exclusively on expensive aerial support

(Novaes, 1980), since rivers in this part of Amazónia

do not offer a good alternative for transportation due

to the high number of rapids, which have inhibited or

in some cases prevented even local populations from

creating major settlements.

Between january 2008 and january 2009, we

sampled birds during 96 days at seven localities spanning

the entire CNP (Avila-Pires et ai, 2010), thus making this

the most complete ornithological survey undertaken to

date in this region. Here, we present an annotated check-

list of birds recorded during those surveys, discussing in

detail several noteworthy records.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between january 2008 and january 2009, we carried out

standard two-week long avifaunal inventories at seven

localities belonging to five conservation units recently

established in the CNP (Figure 1): Faro State Forest

(hereafter FLOTA Faro; sampled between 15 - 28 January

2008), Trombetas State Forest (FLOTA Trombetas; 16 -

28 April 2008), Southern part of the Grão Pará Ecological

Station (ESEC Grão-Pará South; 7-20 June 2008),

northern part of the Grão Pará Ecological Station (ESEC

Grão-Pará North; 28 August - 10 September 2008),

Biological Reservation Maicuru (REBIO Maicuru; 22

October - 5 November 2008), Paru State Forest (FLOTA

Paru; 5 -17 December 2008), and the central part of the

Grão Pará Ecological Station (ESEC Grão-Pará Centre; 19 -

31 January 2009). For a detailed description of those seven

localities, including the habitats surveyed in each of them,

see Avila-Pires et al. (2010). At all sites, a radius of about

5 km around established camps was surveyed, so there

was an overall standardization of the area covered by the

bird inventory at the different sites (Avila-Pires et ai , 2010).

At each locality, birds were surveyed by a single

observer (AA) for about 150 hours with binoculars and

tape recorders (Sony® TCM 5000 or Marantz® PMD

670 coupled to a Sennheiser ME66 microphone).

During this survey, relative abundance estimates for the

different species recorded were obtained with the ‘20

species list' method described in Herzog et al. (2002),

whereby birds detected are grouped in sequential lists

of 20 species; thus, the first list at each site consisted of

the first 20 species recorded, followed by a second list

with the next 20 species detected (which could include

species already recorded in the previous list), and so on.

Due to differences in local species richness, seasonality,

and the total size of the area sampled, the number of ‘20

species' lists accumulated at each site varied as follows;

FLOTA Faro (n = 55); ESEC Grão-Pará North (n = 67);

ESEC Grão-Pará Centre (n = 106); FLOTA Trombetas (n

= 122); FLOTA Paru (n — 143); ESEC Grão-Pará South

12

cm

SciELO

13 14 15 16 17 lí

19 20 21

Boi. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat., Belém, v. 6, n, 1, p. 11-65, jan.- abr. 2011

(n = 165); and REBIO Maicum (n = 181). At each site,

the percentage at which any given species appeared in

'20 species lists’ was taken as their relative abundance;

furthermore, ‘20 species lists' were used to generate

observed species rarefaction curves, thus providing a

measure of survey efficiency at each site (see below).

Twenty 12 x 2 m mist-nets were operated

independently during 12 days at each site by MC (FLOTA

Trombetas; ESEC Grão-Pará South; ESEC Grão-Pará

Gentre; ESEC Grão-Pará North; REBIO Maicuru;

FLOTA Paru), FP (FLOTA Trombetas), EP (FLOTA

Faro), and LSM (ESEC Grão-Pará Gentre) and resulted

in accumulation of an additional sampling effort 1.500

net.hours per site.

Voucher specimens were collected with shotguns

and mist-nets and deposited in the ornithological collection

of the Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (hereafter MPEG) in

Belém, State of Pará, Brazil.

Based on '20 species lists' accumulated at each

site, observed species rarefaction curves and two

estimators of species richness (Chao 2 and MMMean)

were calculated separately for all seven sites sampled

with the software EstimateS version 8.2 (Golwell,

2009). According to Herzog et al. (2002), Ghao 2 and

MMMean were the best performing richness estimators

in their simulated and empirical datasets based on

‘20 species lists' of Neotropical avian communities in

Bolivia, Confidence intervals for both rarefaction curves

and species richness estimators were assessed with 50

randomizations. Similarity in species composition across

the sites sampled was calculated with a cluster analysis

on presence-absence data, as implemented in the PAST

2.0 software (Hammer et al ., 2001).

Gommon namesof species, sequence, nomenclature,

and taxonomy adopted throughout this paper follow the

Brazilian Gheck-list Gommittee (CBRO, 2009). We present

colour photos of some of the species found during the

expeditions (Figures 2-44). They appear in the same

sequence as in the Appendix.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

SPECIES RICHNESS AND SURVEY EFFICIENCY

A total of446 species of birds was recorded at all seven sites

sampled (Appendix). Species richness at each site varied

between 203 (ESEC Grão-Pará North) and 302 (REBIO

Maicuru; Table 1). A common pattern was that the three

richest sites (all with ca. 300 species, i.e. FLOTA Faro,

REBIO Maicuru, and FLOTA Paru; Table 1) were all in the

vicinityof large rivers (respectively, Nhamundá, Ipitinga, and

Paru), which added species associated with riverine habitats

to the pool of upland 'terra-firme' species that consisted

the bulk of species recorded at all sites (Appendix).

Rarefaction cun/es obtained at all sites (all of which

reached the asymptote; not shown) yielded fairly narrow

observed species confidence intervals (Table 1), thus

indicating that surveys sampled a very significant portion

of the local avifauna present atthe time ofthe inventories.

Richness estimators Chao 2 and MMMean predicted the

occurrences of additional species varying from as low as 10

(MMMean at ESEC Grão-Pará South ) up to 100 (Chao 2

mean at FLOTA Faro; Table 1). According to both ofthose

estimators, FLOTA Faro was the site for which the largest

number of additional species was predicted, and thus it

can be regarded as the least thoroughly sampled site in

this study (Table 1); accordingly, FLOTA Faro had also the

smallest sample size of '20 species lists' among all sites.

Upper bound Chao 2 confidence intervals indicated

that the four richest sites (FLOTA Faro, ESEC Grão-Pará

South , REBIO Maicuru, and FLOTA Paru) have a maximum

predicted richness of400 - 450 species (Table 1); those four

sites were the most heterogeneous in terms of elevations

and habitats present, which included large stretches of

seasonally-flooded and transitional forests (ESEG Grão-Pará

South only) in addition to the widespread 'terra-firme' forest

at several altitudes (Avila-Pires et al ., 2010). A second group

of sftes included FLOTA Trombetas and ESEG Grão-Pará

Genter, with predicted species richness slightly above 300

species (Table 1); despite this similarity in predicted species

13

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: (...) II. Avifauna

Table 1. Comparative Índices of avian species richness among the seven CNP sites sampled in this study.

Sites

Sobs (95% Cl)’

MMMeans^

Chao 2 Mean (95% Cl)’

FLOTA Faro

292 (275.2 - 308.8)

379,93

392.01(351.9 -458.99)

FLOTA Trombetas

244 (232.38 - 255.62)

259,32

282.88 (263.07 - 323.28)

ESEC Grão-Pará South

286 (272,91 - 299,09)

296,68

336.53 (312.57 - 382.07)

ESEC Grão-Pará Centre

228 (216.37-239.63)

246,12

266.77 (245.95-311.71)

ESEC Grão-Pará North

203 (194.77-211.23)

236,88

220.73 (210.03 - 247.75)

REBIO Maicuru

302 (289.35 - 314.65)

316,46

347.91 (325.22 - 392.75)

FLOTA Paru

295 (281.39 -308.61)

315,37

349.93 (323.67- 400.22)

' Sobs - number of species observed along with 95% confidence inten/als (Cl) obtained with rarefaction curves based on '20 species

lists' accumulated at each site (see text).

^ MMMeans estimator of species richness obtained with rarefaction

^ Chao 2 estimator of species richness along with 95% confidence

curves based on ‘20 species lists' accumulated at each site (see text).

intervals obtained with rarefaction curves based on ‘20 species lists'

accumulated at each site (see text).

richness, the ecological factors explaining species richness

at those two sites are completely different. While FLOTA

Trombetas wasfairly homogeneous and covered mostly with

'terra-firme' forest at 300 - 400 m above sea levei, ESEC

Grão-Pará Centre was one of the most heterogeneous of

all sites sampled, with a mosaic combination of savanna,

'terra-firme', and transitional forests (Avila-Pires et aí.,

2010). Apparently, while FLOTA Trombetas harbors a

slightly impoverished 'terra-firme' bird community due to

its comparatively high average elevation (ca, 350 species

of birds are predicted to occur only in 'terra-firme' forests

throughout Amazónia; Cohn-Haft et ai , 1997), this same

community is even more impoverished at ESEC Grão-Pará

Centre due to the natural fragmentation of 'terra-firme' forest

by the locally widespread savanna, but this is somewhat

compensated by a higher inter-habitat beta diversity, thus

yielding similar species richness values (see Appendix for

diferences in species composition). Finally, the poorest site

according to both observed and predicted species richness

was ESEC Grão-Pará North (with ca. 250 species; Table 1),

and this can probably be explained by the fact that this was

the highest and one of the least heterogeneous sites among

all those sun/eyed (Avila-Pires et al ., 2010); in addition to

a locally impoverished 'terra-firme' community due to the

higher altitude and little habitat heterogeneity, the absence

of several otherwise widespread Amazonian species such as

macaws {Ara spp.), parrots {Amazona spp.), and toucanets

{Pteroglossus spp.) could be dueto a seasonal effect linked to

local scarcity in fruit supplies during the timing of the survey.

Despite the sampling limitations of this study,

analyses of rarefaction curves and richness estimates

combined indicate that 1) even though species lists

produced were not exhaustive at any given site, they

nonetheless included a very significant part of the local bird

community; and 2) there was a good correspondence

between the local landscape and habitat heterogeneity

and leveis of observed and estimated avian species

richness throughout the CNR as documented previously

for other Neotropical bird communities (Robinson &

Terborgh, 1997).

SPECIES COMPOSITION AND DISTRIBUTION

Species composition varied significantly across all seven

sites sampled, with 346 species (77.5% of all 446 species

recorded) absent from at least one site (Appendix; Table 2).

Inasmuch as part of this variation probably was due to the fact

that some species were not observed at particular sites due

to the relative short period of the surveys, another part also

certainly reflected true diferences in species composition,

which will be explored in more detail here based on the

14

cm

SciELO

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Boi. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat., Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 11-65, jan,- abr, 2011

Table 2. Similarity in species composition amongthe seven CNP sites sampled in this study, Rairwise total number of species shared between

sites is shown below the diagonal whereas Jaccard similarity Índices between sites is shown above the diagonal.

Sites

FLOTA Faro

FLOTA

Trombetas

ESEC Grão-

Pará North

ESEC Grão-

Fárá Centre

ESEC Grão-

Pará South

REBIO

Maicuru

FLOTA

Fáru

FLOTA Faro (27)’

0.536

0.46

0.44

0.558

0.601

0.599

FLOTA Trombetas (2)

187

0.574

0.494

0.677

0.655

0.604

ESEC Grão-Pará North (7)

156

163

0.441

0.538

0.544

0.495

ESEC Grão-Pará Centre (20)

159

156

132

0.572

0.48

0.507

ESEC Grão-Pará South (8)

207

214

171

187

0.685

0.655

REBIO Maicuru (5)

223

216

178

172

239

0.686

FLOTA Paru (10)

220

203

165

176

230

243

' In parenthesis is the total number of species recorded exclusively at each site.

results of a clusteranalysis with species’ presence - absence

data at all seven sites sampled (Rgure 45).

The most distinct site in terms of composition of the

local bird community was ESEC Grão-Pará Centre, which

did not group with any other particular site according to

the results of the cluster analysis (Figure 45). This major

distinction is explained by the fact that unlike the other

sites where ‘terra-firme’ forest was by far the dominant

vegetation type, at ESEC Grão-Pará Centre, open

savanna (found only at this site) was the major habitat

type sampled instead (Avila-Pires et al., 2010); therefore,

out of the 20 species recorded exclusively at this site,

15 at least can be regarded as typical savanna species

(sensu Silva, 1995), such as Aratinga aurea (Psittacidae),

Hydropsalis torquata (Caprimulgidae), Synailaxis albescens

(Furnariidae), Elaenia cristata, Elaenia chiriquensis, and

Myiarchus tyrannulus (Tyrannidae), and Schistochlamys

melanopis (Thraupidae) (Table 2; Appendix). Another

factor distinguishing the bird community at ESEC Grão-

Pará Centre was the absence of many ‘core’ ‘terra-firme’

species recorded at all other sites (e.g., Pyrrhura picta

[Psittacidae], Cercomacra dnerascens [Thamnophilidae],

Formicarius analis [Formicariidae], Deconychura longicauda

[Dendrocolaptidae], Sirystes sibilator [Tyrannidae],

Perissocephalus tricolor [Cotingidae], Vireolanius leucotis

[Vireonidae], and Lanio fulvus [Thraupidae]) probably due

to the small area covered by this habitat at this site; in fact,

we sampled two naturally isolated fragments of 'terra-

firme’ forest at ESEC Grão-Pará Centre (Avila-Pires et al.,

2010), providing evidence that many of those typical and

widespread ‘terra-firme’ species were absentfrom this site

probably due to a fragmentation effect (Appendix).

The next most dissimilar locality was ESEC Grão-Pará

North, which had the lowest species richness of all sites

sampled due to reduced habitat heterogeneity and overall

high elevation (ca. 400-600 m; Avila-Pires et ai, 2010).

Indeed, out ofthe seven species recorded exclusively atthis

site, flve are associated with forest above 300 m as recorded

in the neighboring Acary mountains by Robbins et al. (2007):

Megascops guatemalae (Strigidae), Amazilia viridigaster

cupreicauda (Trochilidae), Contopus nigrescens (Tyrannidae),

Oxyruncus cristatus (Tityridae), and Hylophilus sclateri

(Vireonidae). According to Jaccard indexes, ESEC Grão-

Pará North was most similar to FLOTA Trombetas, REBIO

Maicuru and ESEC Grão-Fárá South (Table 2; Appendix),

all sites where forest above 300 m was also surveyed.

Therefore, the uniqueness ofthe bird fauna recorded at ESEC

Grão-Pará North can be explained by the a strong influence

of a distinct element not present in any of the other sites

sun/eyed: the Tepui avifauna occurring mostly in the Brazilian

State of Roraima, western Guyana, and southem Venezuela,

but with a few species reaching the upper elevations of the

15

cm

SciELO

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: (...) II. Avifauna

Acary mountains in Southern Guyana (Robbins et a/., 2007),

Tafelberg in central Suriname (Zyskowski et al., 2011), and

the northern part of ESEC Grão-Pará in northwestem Pará.

All remaining five sites grouped together in the

cluster analysis, but within this group all four sites located

in the eastern portion of the CNP (FLOTA Trombetas,

ESEC Grão-Pará South , REBIO Maicuru, and FLOTA Paru)

were separated from the westernmost site: FLOTA Faro

(Figure 45). This major dichotomy between the eastern

and western parts of the CNP is explained by a break in

species distributions that apparently coincides with the

Trombetas river, which separatesthe eastern and western

sites sampled. Species recorded only at FLOTA Faro

such as Amazona autumnalis (Psittacidae), Pharomachrus

pavoninus (Trogonidae), Herpsilochmus dorsimaculatus and

Percnostola subcristata (Thamnophilidae), and Neopelma

chrysocephaium (Pipridae) are frequent in the Manaus area

(State of Amazonas) on the southwestern comer of the

Guiana Shield (Cohn-Hafteta/., 1997), but have notbeen

recorded in the State of Amapá and French Guiana on the

opposite (easternmost) part ofthe shield (Novaes, 1974,

1978; Tostain et al., 1992), indicating a possible break in

their distributions somewhere in the CNP Our surveys

indicated that the bird fauna at FLOTA Faro is more similar

in composition to that ofthe Manaus area than to any of

those sites sampled by us in the CNR includingthe closest

site sampled at FLOTA Trombetas, roughly 200 km to the

east, but which clusters with the easternmost sampled

sites ESEC Grão-Pará South, REBIO Maicuru, and FLOTA

Paru (Figure 45). Therefore, as also verified for the local

herpetofauna (Avila-Pires et al., 2010), an important

break in the western/eastern composition of bird faunas

associated with upland and white-sandAransitional forests

was found in the CNR and we tentatively correlate this

discontinuity with the lower stretches of the Trombetas

river, a major Amazonian tributary with its headwaters

on the Guiana Shield. In their taxonomic review of the

Percnostola rufifrons species complex (Thamnophilidae),

Isler et al. (2001) already pointed to the role played by

the lower Trombetas in delimiting the ranges of those

lineages of antbirds, and the results obtained here

indicate that other species of birds also share the same

pattern. The following factors are also responsible for

the observed dissimilarity in the composition ofthe bird

fauna of FLOTA Faro in comparison to the other sites

sampled (lable 2): 1) the presence oftypical 'white-water’

floodplain forest (Várzea’) species associated with the

Amazon river and the lower part of its main tributaries

such as the Nhamundá river, but absent from most of

the black or clear water tributaries of the Amazon in the

CNP {Milvago chimachima [Falconidae], Eurypyga helias

[Eurypygidae], Celeus flavescens [Plàdae], and Todirostrum

maculatum, Tolmomyias sulphurescens and Ochthornis

littoralis [Tyrannidae]); 2) presence of several species

associated with lacustrine environments and absent

from the fast running rivers (e.g. Paru and Ipitinga) of

the CNP {Pilherodius pileatus [Ardeidae], Mesembrinibis

cayennensis [Threskiornithidae], Pandion haliaetus

[Pandionidae], yacana jacana [jacanidae], and Phaetusa

simplex [Sternidae]; and 3) presence of species associated

with man-disturbed habitats along the Nhamundá river

but not observed at the remaining and less disturbed

sites {Buteo nitidus [Accipitridae], Columbina minuta

[Columbidae], and Troglodytes musculus [Troglodytidae]).

Finally, the four remaining sites east of the Trombetas

river (FLOTA Trombetas, ESEC Grão-Pará South, REBIO

Maicuru and FLOTA Paru) shared between 203 and 243

species and exhibited pairw/ise jaccard similarity indexes

varying from 0.604 to 0.686 (Table 2; Appendix). Within

this group, the two geographically closest sites (FLOTA

Trombetas and ESEC Grão-Pará South, separated by less

than 100 km) grouped together, the same happening with

REBIO Maicuru and FLOTA Paru, the two easternmost sites

sampled (Figures 1 and 46), Those four sites are inhabrted

by Guiana Shield endemics known to occur only on the

eastern portion ofthe shield in Guyana, Suriname, French

Guiana, Amapá, and the CNR such asAratinga maculata

[Psittacidae], Threnetes niger fFrochilidae], Thamnophilus

16

cm

SciELO

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Boi. Mus. Rara. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat., Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 11-65, jan.- abr, 2011

melanothorax [Thamnophilidae], and Contopus albogularis

[Tyrannidae], but also by several other more widespread

species which have their distributions on the Guiana Shield

centered in its northeastern portion (i.e., Ara severus

[Psittacidae], Cercomacra nigrescens and Myrmoborus

leucophrys [Thamnophilidae], Leptopogon amaurocephalus

[Tyrannidae], and Neopelma pallescens [Pipridae; Figure

28]; Milensky et ai, 2005). As discussed earlier, the limit

between the typical bird fauna associated with the eastern

and western portions of the Guiana Shield apparently

coincides with the Trombetas river in the middle of CNP

but at least one notable exception to this general pattern

exist; Thamnophilus melanothorax (Thamnophilidae) has

been recorded west of the lower Trombetas (Zimmer &

Isler, 2003), thus indicating that probably the Trombetas

itself was not the main vicariant barrier causing the

differentiation of the typical eastern and western Guiana

Shield avifaunas, but merely an area where the ranges of

species belongingto those two groups have stabilized (see

Moritzeta/., 2000); future phylogeographic studies should

address this hypothesis and also investigate in more detail

the historical causes ofthis east/west disjunction in the bird

fauna of the Guiana Shield reported herein.

Despite those significant differences in species

composition, 100 species (22.4% or nearly a quarter of

all species recorded during this study) were shared by all

sites sampled, indicating the existence of a 'core' avifauna

constituted mostly of widespread Neotropical/Amazonian

species (e.g., Crypturellus variegatus [Tinamidae], Patagioenas

plúmbea [Columbidae], Piaya cayana [Cuculidae],

Ramphastos viteilinus [Ramphastidae], Myrmotherula

axillaris [Thamnophilidae], Dendrocincla fuliginosa

[Dendrocolaptidae], Terenotriccus erythrurus [Tyrannidae],

Lipaugus vodferans [Cotingidae], Turdus albicoilis [Turdidae],

and Psarocolius viridis [Icteridae]) and widespread Guiana

Shield endemics (e.g., Penelope marail [Cracidae], Pyrilia

calca [Psittacidae], Monasa atra [Bucconidae; Figure

10], Capito niger [Capitonidae], Selenidera piperivora

[Ramphastidae], Epinecrophylla gutturalis, Myrmotherula

guttata (Figure 13), Hypocnemis cantator (Figure 14),

and Gymnopithys rufigula (Figure 18) [Thamnophilidae],

Xiphorhynchus pardalotus [Dendrocolaptidae; Figure 22],

and Tyranneutes virescens [Pipridae]).

As discussed above, ecological factors such as local

landscape (elevation) and habitat heterogeneity (see also

Avila-Pires et ai, 2010), coupled with historical factors

such as the presence of typical “eastern" and “western"

Guiana Shield elements as discussed above, are ultimately

responsible not only for differences in species richness but

also and foremost for differences in composition of bird

communities amongthe seven sites sampled.

NOTEWORTHY RECORDS

We recorded 62 species in the CNP for which our

records represented important range extensions, including

some locally distributed, poorly known, and rare species,

discussed in detail below.

Crypturellus brevirostris - Rusty Tinamou

Exclusively vocal records were obtained for this species

only at FLOTA Faro and ESEC Grão-Pará North, the two

westernmost sites surveyed, where it was considered

uncommon and fairly common, respectively (Appendix).

Throughout the Guiana Shield, records of this species

are very spotty (Novaes, 1974; Milensky et ah, 2005;

Robbins et al., 2007).

Ara severus - Chestnut-fronted Macaw

We recorded pairs and flocks of up to flve individuais ofthis

species only at the two easternmost sites surveyed (REBIO

Maicuru and FLOTA Paru), where it was considered fairly

common (Appendix). Our records are the first published

for the Guiana Shield in the State of Pará, being continuous

with those previously reported for the neighboring State of

Amapá (Novaes, 1974). The lack of records ofthis species

at the other five localities sampled in the CNP seems to

indicate atrue absence in the core area ofthe Guiana Shield

as indicated in InfoNatura (2007).

17

cm

SciELO

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: (...) II. Avifauna

Aratinga macuiata - Sulfur-breasted Parakeet

This range-restricted and Guiana Shield endemic described

originally as Aratinga pintai was uncommon at FLOTA

Trombetas and ESEC Grão-Pará South, but rare at FLOTA

Paru (Appendix), where one adult male was collected

(MPEG 66405; see Nemésio & Rasmussen, 2009 for

nomenclatural changes). At those localities, small flocks of

up to eight individuais were recorded flying overthe forest,

but more often associated with forest border and river-

edge forest (Appendix); at FLOTA Trombetas, a flock was

obsen/ed continuously between 16 and 28 April roosting

together in the cavity of a dead-tree. Our records, along

with those published recently by Mittermeier et al. (2010)

for Sipaliwini in Suriname, extend considerably the known

distribution ofthis species north and eastward, atthe same

time that showing it to be rare to uncommon throughout

most of its range (Silveira et al., 2005). Our record for

FLOTA Paru indicates that 4. macuiata is probably also

found in the neighboring State of Amapá, where there are

no published records (Novaes, 1974).

Touit huetii - Scarlet-shouldered Parrotlet

This species was recorded based on voice alone twice at

FLOTA Faro (15 and 26 January 2008) and several times at

REBIO Maicuru (between 22 October and 2 November

2008), but was considered rare at both localities

(Appendix). Our records represent the first published

for the CNP and the eastern part of the Guiana Shield

(Pará - Amapá area of Milensky et ai, 2005), where the

species was considered mostly absent, except for records

in Venezuela and Guyana (InfoNatura, 2007). Robbins

et ai (2004) report a Touit sp. as common at Parabara in

western Guyana, which could well refer to this species.

Amazona autumnalis - Red-lored Parrot

This species was recorded exclusively at FLOTA Faro,

where it was considered uncommon and a female was

collected on 26 January 2008 (MPEG 64596). This

represents the first published record of this species for

the State of Pará and the western part of the Guiana Shield

(Milensky et al., 2005). At FLOTA Faro a few flocks with

over ten individuais were observed feeding in the treetops

of several fruiting trees. The specimen collected exhibited

all diagnostic characters of the diadema subspecies, a

range-restricted taxon known previously only for the lower

portions of the Negro and Solimões rivers in the Brazilian

State of Amazonas (Forshaw, 2006). Future systematic

Work should evaluate the evolutionary distinctiveness of

the range-restricted and isolated diadema, which, if proven

an evolutionary independentlineage, should be monitored

for conservation purposes due to its small range and dose

association with seasonally flooded forest types.

Dromococcyx phasianellus - Pheasant Cuckoo

A single individual ofthis species was heard vocalizing its

typical song during the night and dawn near ESEC Grão-

Pará South on the top of a plateau covered by stunted forest

in june and October 2008 (exact coordinates 0° 13' S and

55° 09’ W). Apparently, this represents the first published

record of this species north of the Amazon in the State

of Pará and also the eastern portion of the Guiana Shield

(Milensky et al., 2005; Restall et al., 2006; InfoNatura,

2007). See also comments on the species below.

Dromococcyx pavoninus - Pavonine Cuckoo

Two records of this species based solely on its typical

song were obtained at ESEC Grão-Pará South on 12 and

20 June 2008 in seasonally flooded forest with a very

dense understory. Apparently, those records are the first

published for this species north of the Amazon in the State

of Pará and also the eastern portion of the Guiana Shield

in the Pará - Amapá area of Milensky et al. (2005). At

ESEC Grão-Pará South, where both Dromococcyx species

were recorded in June 2008, they seem to replace

each other in different habitats and elevations, with D.

phasianellus occurring at higher sites covered by stunted

and transitional forest and D. pavoninus occupying lower

sites with forest near water.

18

cm

cSciELO^

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Boi. Mus. Para. Êrmflio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat., Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 11-65, jan,- abr. 2011

Megascops guatemalae - Vermiculated Screech-Owl

Records of this species (theoretically referring to the

disjunct and distinct roraimae subspecies) were obtained

only at ESEC Grão-Pará North, above 500 m, where it

was considered fairly common (Appendix); one individual

was tape-recorded on 2 September 2008. The recorded

song matches preciselythoseofbirds tape-recorded inthe

nearby Acary mountains in Guyana (e.g., Macaulay Libary

Audio # 131078 and 134487), where a specimen was

obtained (Braun et aJ., 2003). Our record is the first for

the State of Pará and also the eastern portion ofthe Guiana

Shield in the Pará - Amapá area of Milensky et al. (2005).

Asio stygius - Stygian Owl

A single record of this owl was obtained at ESEG Grão-Pará

Gentre in forest/savanna ecotone, where an individual was

tape-recorded at dusk on 23 January 2009. This record is

apparently the first for the GNP and also for the eastern

portion of the Guiana Shield in the Pará - Amapá area of

Milensky et al. (2005). The nearest previous records are

from Southern Guyana, which, together with the present

record, reinforce the prediction thatthe species will be also

found in nearby Suriname (Robbins et al., 2007).

Caprimulgus rufus - Rufous Nightjar

Between 8 and 17 June 2008, several records of an

apparently lone individual of this species were obtained

in a natural clearing during the night and at dawn near the

camp site at ESEG Grão-Pará South. Tape-recordings were

obtained on 9 June 2008. Apparently, this represents the first

published record of this species north of the Amazon in the

State of Pará (Robbins & Parker 111, 1997). One previously

unpublished specimen from Amapá (also in the eastern

portion of the Guiana Shield) is housed at MPEG (53435).

Hydropsalis torquata - Scissor-tailed Nightjar

One lone individual sighted at dusk on 24 january 2009

in open savanna at ESEC Grão-Pará Centre apparently

represents the first published record of this species

north of the Amazon in the State of Pará (Restall et al.,

2006; InfoNatura, 2007). Three additional unpublished

specimens from Monte Alegre (also in the CNP) are

housed at MPEG (53343 - 53345). The nearest records

to the one from ESEC Grão-Pará Centre come from

the Sipaliwini savanna in nearby Southern Suriname

(Haverschmidt & Mees, 1994; Mittermeier ef a/., 2010).

Threnetes niger - Sooty Barbthroat

This range-restricted species, endemic to the eastern

portion of the Guiana Shield, was recorded at FLOTA

Trombetas (two females collected on 25 and 26 April

2008, respectively MPEG 64962 and 64963), REBIO

Maicuru (sighted once on 24 October 2008), and FLOTA

Paru (one female collected on 15 December 2008: MPEG

66415), Those records represent the first for the State

of Pará and together extend the known distribution of

T. niger ca. 300 km to the west. MPEG 64963 (FLOTA

Paru) possesses the characteristic dark tail with whitish

tips, a character diagnosing T. niger from its widespread

congener T. leucurus, and shows the characters of

subspecies loehkeni. Even though they were collected at

the same locality (FLOTA Trombetas), MPEG 64962 and

64963 differ from each other in that the latter specimen

shows the completely dark tail pattern niger, whereas

the former has some light whitish spots evident on the

externai rectrices, thus approaching leucurus', the latter

two specimens also have lighter underparts than the

FLOTA Paru specimen and two additional specimens

collected in Amapá (not far from the latter locality), both

also with the diagnostic tail pattern of T niger (MPEG

40370 and 40371). The differences in the tail pattern

and underpart colors among the CNP specimens

reported herein indicate either that 1) T. niger is more

variable than previously thought, with a distinct morph

(new taxon?) in the western part of its range; or 2) that

some intergradation, as evidenced in the tail pattern, is

happening between T. niger and T. leucurus in central

Pará, somewhere around the lower Trombetas river.

19

cm

.SciELO,

13 14 15 16 17 lí

19 20

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: (...) II. Avifauna

Distinguishing between those two alternatives is essential

for treating niger and leucurus as independent species

or subspecies (Schuchmann, 1999; Remsen Jr. et al.,

2010). These findings reinforce the need of a taxonomic

re-evaluation of the Threnetes specinnens on the Guiana

Shield to better document the ranges of T. leucurus and

T. niger in this part of Amazónia.

Amazilia viridigaster - Green-bellied Hummingbird

On 6 September 2008, a lone individual with a characteristic

white dot behind the eye and a rufous tail typical of

subspecies cupreicauda, was sighted for about a minute

in the mid-story of forest edge near a creek and a ridge

at ca. 350 m in ESEC Grão-Pará North. This species had

been previousiy recorded in the nearby Acary mountains

in Guyana (Robbins et a!., 2007). Our record is the first

for the State of Pará and the first Brazilian record outside

the State of Roraima (Naka et al., 2006).

Colaptes rubiginosus - Golden-olive Woodpecker

On 1 September 2008 a single male was collected (MPEG

65752) while attending a mixed-species flock and after

responding to play-back in montane forest at ca. 550 m

in ESEC Grão-Pará North. On 31 October 2008 another

individual was heard on the top of a ridge covered by forest

atca. 500 m in REBIO Maicuru. Those two records are the

first for the State of Párá and they indicate that C. rubiginosus

may be found in other localities throughout the CNP at

comparatively high elevations (> 500 m), mainly those along

or not far the border with Guyana, Suriname, and French

Guiana, where the species has been recorded (Tostain et al .,

1992; Haverschmidt & Mees, 1994; Robbins e£ a/., 2007),

Thamnophilus melanothorax - Band-tailed Antshrike

We recorded this range restricted species, endemic to the

Guiana Shield, at FLOTATrombetas (several individuais tape-

recorded and one male collected: MPEG 65082), ESEC

Grão-Pará South (a pair tape-recorded), REBIO Maicuru

(at least two pairs located and one male tape-recorded

and collected: MPEG 66226), and FLOTA Paru (one pair

located). All records took place in creek-side 'terra-firme'

forest or riverine forest (Appendix). This species' loud song

is very low in pitch, which, added to its secretive habits

and low density as recorded in the CNR may account for

the paucity of records outside the Brazilian State of Amapá,

Suriname, and French Guiana (Novaes, 1974; Tostain et al.,

1992; FHaverschmidt & Mees, 1994). The records reported

herein indicate a widespread distribution in the CNP east

of the Trombetas river, whereas literature records support

a more spotty distribution west of this river into Guyana

and the Brazilian State of Amazonas (Zimmer & Isler, 2003;

Robbins et al., 2007).

Herpsilochmus sticturus - Spot-tailed Antwren

We recorded this Guiana Shield endemic at five of the

seven sites surveyed, where it was common (except at

ESEC Grão-Pará North) and usually found in 'terra-firme'

forest attending the same canopy flocks as the species

below. Documentation for this species at CNP included

three specimens (MPEG 64995 and 64996, respectively

unsexed and male, both from FLOTA Trombetas, and

MPEG 65432, male, from ESEC Grão-Pará South) and

several tape-recordings (Appendix). Together, our records

indicate a widespread distribution east of the Trombetas

river in the CNR as pointed out by Zimmer & Isler (2003),

but unlike other sources such as InfoNatura (2007) and

Restall et ai (2006); our only record west of this river is

from ESEC Grão-Pará North, adjacentto Guyana, where

H. sticturus has been recorded at several sites in the

southwestern cornerofthe country (Robbins ef a/., 2007).

In fact, due to its dose proximity to the State of Roraima,

our record from ESEC Grão-Pará North suggests that H.

sticturus can probably also be found in this State, where

the species has not yet been recorded (Naka et a/., 2006).

Herpsilochmus stictocephalus - Todd's Antwren

We recorded this other Herpsilochmus endemic to the

Guiana Shield at all localities sampled, where it was either

20

cm

,SciELO

2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Boi. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat., Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 11-65, jan.- abr. 2011

common or frequent and most often associated with

canopy mixed-speciesílocks (Appendix). Documentation

included three specimens from FLOTA Trombetas (two

adult males, both tape-recorded: MPEG 64992 - 64993;

and one adult female: MPEG 64994), four specimens

from ESEC Grão-Pará South (three adult males: MPEG

64433, 65434, and 65436; and one adult female: MPEG

65435), and tape-recordings at FLOTA Faro (where it co-

occurred with the Spot-backed Antwren Herpsilochmus

dorsimaculatus, recorded only at this locality) and ESEG

Grão-Pará North (Appendix). Our records reported

herein, which include all localities sampled at CNR

significantly extend the known distribution of this species

300 - 400 km to the Southern and western portions of

the CNR revealing a much wider range than previously

thought (Zimmer & Isler, 2003; Restall et ai, 2006).

Given their dose proximity to country and State borders,

our records from FLOTA Faro and ESEC Grão-Pará North

(see Figure 1), and those by Robbins et al. (2004) from the

Rupununi area in Guyana, indicate that/-/. stictocephalus

almost surely occurs in the Brazilian States of Amazonas

and Roraima, where the species has not been recorded

yet (Zimmer & Isler, 2003; Naka et al., 2006).

Microrhopias quixensis - Dot-winged Antwren

We recorded this uncommon to fairly-common species

only at FLOTA Faro, REBIO Maicuru (where a female

and a male, respectively MPEG 66268 and 66269, were

collected), and FLOTA Paru (Appendix). Both specimens

collected at REBIO Maicuru belong to the diagnostic

subspecies microstictus, a Guiana Shield endemic

(Zimmer & Isler, 2003). Our record for FLOTA Faro

(several individuais were tape-recorded) and a previously

unpublished female (MPEG 43764) collected on 9 May

1985 in the lower Mapuera river near its confluence with

the Trombetas, represent a ca. 400 km southwestward

range extension into the Guiana Shield, with the previous

nearest records coming from northeastern Pará, Amapá,

and Southern Guyana (Zimmer & Isler, 2003; Restall et a/..

2006). At all CNP sites sun/eyed this species was associated

with river-edge forest, foraging in mixed-species flocks

especially in bamboo (REBIO Maicuru and FLOTA Paru)

and vine-tangles (FLOTA Faro). Our record from FLOTA

Faro indicates that M. quixensis microstictus may also be

found in the neighboring State of Amazonas.

Formicivora grisea - White-fringed Antwren

We recorded this species in 'campina', 'cerrado', and

transitional forest at FLOTA Faro, ESEC Grão-Pará South

(one unsexed specimen collected: MPEG 65440), and

ESEC Grão-Pará Centre (where three males and one

female, respectively MPEG 66670, 66672, 66673 and

MPEG 66671, were collected; Appendix). All collected

specimens belong to the nominate subspecies grisea

(Zimmer & Isler, 2003). These records indicate a much

more widespread distribution in the CNP and the Guiana

Shield as awholethan previously known. They also show

that the species is always associated with open vegetation

enclaves (Zimmer & Isler, 2003; Restall et a/., 2006).

Cercomacra nigrescens - Blackish Antbird

We recorded this species always in dose association with

riparian habitats at FLOTA Trombetas (on the banks ofthe

Cuminapanema river), REBIO Maicuru (banks ofthe Ipitinga

river), and FLOTA Paru (banks of the Paru river, where

a young male and an adult female, respectively MPEG

66492 and 66494, were collected and a few individuais

tape-recorded; Appendix). Our records and those of Naka

et al. (2006) reinforce this species’ much more widespread

distribution in the CNP and the Guiana Shield as a whole,

as first reported by Zimmer & Isler (2003), but contradicting

other sources (Ridgely & Tudor, 1994; Restall et al., 2006).

Myrmoborus leucophrys - White-browed Antbird

We recorded this bird at four of the seven localities

sampled: FLOTA Trombetas (where MPEG 65000,

an adult female, was collected, and a pair was tape-

recorded on the banks of the Cuminapanema river).

21

2 3

.SciELO,

cm

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: (...) II. Avifauna

ESEC Grão-Pará South, REBIO Maicuru, and FLOTA

Paru (where six specimens were collected: MPEG 66523

- 66528; Appendix). All specimens collected belonged

to subspecies angustirostrís. The records from FLOTA

Trombetas and ESEC Grão-Pará South significantly extend

the known distribution of M. leucophrys into the central

part of the CNR from where it was thought to be absent

(Zimmer & Isler, 2003).

Myrmedza longipes - White-bellied Antbird

This species was recorded only at ESEC Grão-Pará South

(where one individual was tape-recorded) and ESEC Grão-

Pará Centre (where a male and a female, respectively

MPEG 66659 and 66660, were collected; Appendix), Even

though this species is well known in the eastern and central

portions the CNP (Zimmer & Isler, 2003), our records

from ESEC Grão-Pará South and Centre appear to be

the northernmost for Pará and show that M. longipes can

be found in isolated open vegetation enclaves throughout

CNP as also recorded in Southern French Guiana (Restall

et ah, 2006) and Suriname (Mittermeiereta/., 2010).

Hylophylax punctulatus - Dot-backed Antbird

On 28 August 2008 a single individual of this species

singing its typical song was heard along a medium-sized

creek at ca, 350 m in ‘terra-firme' forest at ESEC Grão-

Pará North; unfortunately, the bird stopped singing before

it could be tape-recorded. No other records of this

species were obtained at this or any of the other sites

surveyed in the CNP (Appendix), This represents the first

record of H. punctulatus in the CNP and one of the few

for the Guiana Shield east of the Rio Branco, where only

two isolated populations are known from French Guiana

(Zimmer & Isler, 2003; Naka et al., 2006; Restall et ai,

2006). Despite the fact that this species was not recorded

in the nearby Acary mountains by Robbins et a!. (2007),

our record at ESEC Grão-Pará North strongly indicates

it may also be found in Guyana eventually (Zimmer &

Isler, 2003; Restall et a/., 2006).

Xiphocolaptes promeropirhynchus - Strong-billed

Woodcreeper

On 23 April 2008 at dawn a single individual of this

species singing its typical song was heard along a creek

in 'terra-firme' forest at ca. 350 m in FLOTA Trombetas;

unfortunately, the bird stopped singing before it could be

tape-recorded. No other records of this species were

obtained at this or any of the other sites surveyed in the

CNP (Appendix). This represents the first record of this

species for the CNP and one of the few records for the

Guiana Shield east of the Branco river and outside of the

Tepuis (iMarantz et al., 2003; Naka et al., 2006; Restall et

al., 2006; Robbins et al., 2007), As recorded in Guyana,

Suriname, and French Guiana, X. promeropirhynchus seems

very rare and restricted to higher elevation sites in the CNP

(Robbins et al., 2007; Restall et al., 2006).

Synailaxis albescens - Pale-breasted Spinetail

A few individuais of this species were heard and tape-

recorded at ESEC Grão-Pará Centre between 22 and

31 January 2009 in open 'cerrado'. This record extends

significantly the known distribution of this species into the

core of the CNP and the Guiana Shield as a whole, since

previous records for those areas were restricted to the

vicinity of the northern bankofthe Amazon and the Guianas

(Remsen Jr., 2003; Restall et al., 2006). We predict that

this species may be found throughout the CNP always

associated with open 'cerrado' enclaves.

Synailaxis macconnelli - McConnelFs Spinetail

We recorded this species only at REBIO Maicuru, where

three specimens were collected (one male; MPEG 66293,

and two females: MPEG 66294 and 66295) and several

individuais tape recorded (Appendix). All specimens

collected exhibited the characters diagnosing subspecies

ofecívr/or (Remsen Jr., 2003; Restall et a/,, 2006). At REBIO

Maicuru, 5. macconnelli was uncommon in the dense

understory of river-edge forest in dose association with

bamboo and vine-tangles. This represents the second

22

cm

,SciELO

2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Boi. Mus, Para. Emnio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat., Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 11-65, jan,- abr, 2011

record of this species for the CNP after that of Novaes

(1980), who collected a female at Aramapucu in the

upper Paru do Leste river, ca, 85 km to the northwest of

REBIO Maicuru (MPEG 32504), This last record from the

CNP \A/as omitted in the latest reviews on this species'

distribution, but together with the record reported

herein show that subspecies obscurior has a much wider

southward distribution than currently recognized (Remsen

Jr„ 2003; Restall et a/,, 2006).

Leptopogon amaurocephalus - Sepia-capped Flycatcher

This species was recorded at all sites sun/eyed, except

FLOTA Faro, with tape-recording of several individuais at

FLOTA Trombetas, ESEC Grão-Pará South, and REBIO

Maicuru, and collecting of specimens at ESEC Grão-Pará

North (MPEG 65882 and 65883, respectively female and

male) and FLOTA Paru (MPEG 66543, male; Appendix).

Prior to our records, the distribution oíL amaurocephalus

in the Southern part of the Guiana Shield was poorly-

known, with some references reporting only Amapá but

not the CNP in this species' range north of the Amazon

in Brazil (Novaes, 1978; Fitzpatrick, 2004a; InfoNatura,

2007); on the other hand, the map shown in Restall et

a/. (2006) does include L. amaurocephalus in the CNR

but without basic supporting information. The record for

FLOTA Trombetas possibly represents the southwestern

most documented record for this species on the Guiana

Shield, and indicates awidespread distribution inthe CNR

as shown in Restall et al. (2006).

Xenops milleri - Rufous-tailed Xenops

We recorded this species at all sites surveyed, except

REBIO Maicuru (Appendix); tape-recordings were

obtained at most sites where the species was present, while

two adult male specimens were collected at FLOTA Faro

(MREG 64665) and FLOTA Fáru (MREG 66474). Together,

those records indicate awidespread distribution in the CNR

Rrobably, the lack of specimens and published records for

this part of Amazônia explains why different sources have

significantly different range maps for this species on the

Guiana Shield (compare Ridgely & Tudor, 1994; InfoNatura,

2007; Restall et al., 2006). Our records provide a solid

basis for includingthe entire CNR inX. millerís distribution

and, particularly the FLOTA Raru record, indicates that

the species may be also found in the neighboring State

of Amapá, where apparently no records are available

(Novaes, 1974; Remsen Jr., 2003).

Hemitriccus inornatus - Pelzeln's Tody-Tyrant

We recorded this spottily-distributed species in the

understory and midstoryof'campina' and transitional forest

habitats at FLOTA Faro, ESEC Grão-Pará South (where

at least three individuais were tape-recorded and one

male was collected; MPEG 65475), and ESEC Grão-Pará

Centre (where two individuais were tape-recorded and

another male collected; MPEG 66692; Appendix). Those

represent the first records for the CNP (Milensky et ai,

2005), extending this species' known distribution in Brazil

ca. 600 km eastward, with the nearest previous published

records coming from two sites in Roraima west of the

Branco river(Nakaeta/., 2006) and Manaus (Clock, 2004).

In December 2005, H. inornatus was tape-recorded and

collected in central Suriname by Zyskowski et al. (2011).

Together, the Suriname and CNP records point towards

a much wider distribution for this species than previously

thought, at the same time that they reinforce the patchy

nature of its occurrence, always associated with 'campina'/

sandy-soil forest (Clock, 2004).

Phyllomyias gríseiceps - Sooty-headed Tyrannulet

We recorded this species at all sites surveyed, except

FLOTA Faro and ESEC Grão-Pará Centre (Appendix). One

male was tape-recorded and collected (MPEG 65059) at

FLOTA Trombetas on 25 April 2008 while responding to

play-back in a mixed-species flock, We also tape-recorded

several individuais oi R gríseiceps at the other sites in the

CNP where the species was recorded; it was always

vocally active and found in the canopy, often associated

23

cm i

.SciELO,

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazii: (...) II. Avifauna

with mixed-speciesflocks (contra Restallef a/., 2006). Prior

to our records, this species was known in Brazii for oniy

three localities, all on the Guiana Shield: Óbidos, State

of Pará (Griscom & Greenway Jn, 1941), Manaus, State

of Amazonas (Cohn-Haft et al., 1997), and the State of

Roraima (Naka et al., 2006). Together, the CNP records

reported herein indicate a much wider and continuous

distribution than currently recognized for this species on

the Guiana Shield; particularly, the records from the eastern

part ofthe CNP (REBIO Maicuru and FLOTA Paru) suggest

that P griseiceps may be also found in the neighbouring

State of Amapá as well as French Guiana where there are

no published records.

Myiopagis caniceps - Cray Elaenia

We obtained aural records of this species at all sites

surveyed, except ESEC Grão-Pará Centre; at all sites

where M. caniceps was found in the CNP it was either

uncommon or rare, with only a few individuais heard

during the surveys and always in association with canopy

mixed-species flocks (Appendix). Our records are the

first for the CNP and reveal an unforeseen widespread

distribution for Al. caniceps on the Guiana Shield in Brazii,

probably indicating a continuous distribution with previous

records from Manaus (Cohn-Haft et al., 1997), Guyana,

and French Guiana (Fitzpatrick, 2004b).

Myiopagis flavivertex - Yellow-crowned Elaenia

We recorded this species associated with seasonally

flooded forest at all sites surveyed in the CNR except

ESEC Grão-Pará North and ESEC Grão-Pará Centre,

where this habitat was absent (Appendix). At FLOTA Faro,

one adult male was collected on 19 January 2008 (MPEG

64747). Most previous records ofthis species for the CNP

and the Guiana Shield as a whole indicated a clustering

along the Amazon river valley, the State of Amapá, and

Coastal Guianas (Fitzpatrick, 2004c; Restall et al., 2006).

Therefore, our records, particularly those for FLOTA

Trombetas and ESEC Grão-Pará South, indicate a more

widespread distribution in the CNP farther away from the

Amazon river valley than previously recognized (Fitzpatrick

2004c; Restall et al., 2006); those records were obtained,

respectively, along the banks of the Cuminapanema and

Curuá rivers, hundreds of km upriver from their mouths

into the Amazon.

Elaenia ruficeps - Rufous-crowned Elaenia

We recorded this patchily distributed species on the Guiana

Shield at ESEC Grão-Pará South (where one individual was

tape-recorded and a male was collected: MPEG 65479)

and ESEC Grão-Pará Centre (where two males - MPEG

66693 and 66694, and onefemale- MPEG 66695, were

collected) only in ‘campina' and 'cerrado' (Appendix). Our

records show that Baenia ruficeps can be found in isolated

open vegetation enclaves throughout CNP thus indicating a

much wider distribution than currently recognized (Hosner,

2004; InfoNatura, 2007; Restall et a/., 2006).

Phylloscartes virescens - Olive-green Tyrannulet

We recorded this species at all sites surveyed, except

FLOTA Faro and ESEC Grão-Pará Centre; several

individuais were tape-recorded at FLOTA Trombetas,

ESEC Grão-Pará South, and FLOTA Paru (Appendix). In

most areas ofthe CNP P virescens was rare and always

associated with canopy mixed-species flocks (Appendix).

Our records are the first for the CN P and together extend

the known range ofthis species significantly to the south

and to the east, since the previous nearest records were

those from Manaus (Cohn-Haft et a!., 1997) and Amapá

(Fitzpatrick, 2004d). These new CNP records support

a continuous and widespread distribution for P virescens

throughout the Guiana Shield in Brazii and the Guianas.

Inezia subflava - Amazonian Tyrannulet

We recorded this species associated with riverine habitats

only at FLOTA Faro (along the Nhamundá river) and

REBIO Maicuru (along the Ipitinga river; Appendix). Our

record from REBIO Maicuru extends significantly to the

24

cm

,SciELO

2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

*

Boi. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat, Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 11-65, jan.- abr. 2011

north the known distribution of this species on the Guiana

Shield, where it was thoughtto be confined to the vicinity

ofthe Amazon rivervalley (Fitzpatrick, 2004e; InfoNatura,

2007; Restall et al., 2006). In fact, /. subflava was known

before to occur in the northern part of the CNP as it was

reported by Novaes (1980) for igarapé Castanheira in the

upper Paru do Leste river (ca. 85 km to the northwest of

REBIO Maicuru), where two specimens were collected

(MPEG 32674 and 32675, respectively male and female);

unfortunately, this important record has been omitted in

all important reviews on this species' distribution (Zimmer

& Whittaker, 2000; Fitzpatrick, 2004e; InfoNatura, 2007;

Restall et al., 2006). Another previously unreported

specimen of I. subflava from the CNP (MPEG 43781, a

female) comes from the lower Mapuera river near its

confluence with the Trombetas river, ca. 70 km north

of FLOTA Faro. These records point towards a much

wider distribution for this species on the Guiana Shield

than previously thought (Zimmer & Whittaker, 2000;

Fitzpatrick, 2004e; InfoNatura, 2007; Restall et a/., 2006).

A map shown in the lasttaxonomic review on the Inezia

subflava/caudata complex includes an isolated record

in the State of Amapá for the Paled-tipped Tyrannulet

Inezia caudata, but no details are given in the Appendices

(Zimmer & Whittaker, 2000); probably Fitzpatrick (2004e)

and InfoNatura (2007) also included Amapá within the

range of /. caudata based on this reference. FHowever,

based on the specimen-based CNP records discussed,

we predict that any Amapá records for Inezia records

might in fact refer to /. subflava instead.

Myiophobus fasciatus - Bran-colored Flycatcher

We recorded this species only in the open 'cerrado' at

ESEC Grão-Pará Centre, where one individual was tape-

recorded and a female (MPEG 66710) and a male (MPEG

66711) were collected (Appendix). This is the first CNP

record, extending significantly to the west the known

distribution of 44. fasciatus on the Guiana Shield, where it

was previously known only from scattered records in the

State of Amapá and the Guianas (Farnsworth & Lebbin,

2004a; InfoNatura, 2007; Robbins et ai, 2004; Restall et

al., 2006). We predict that this species will also be found

in other 'cerrado' enclaves throughout the CNP

Contopus virens - Eastern Wood-Pewee

This boreal migratory species was recorded based on its

typical song only at REBIO Maicuru and ESEC Grão-Pará

Centre, respectively in Late October/Early November 2008

and Late January 2009 in forest edge (Appendix). Those are

the first CNP and apparently the easternmost records for

this species on the Guiana Shield and the entire Amazon

basin (Farnsworth & Lebbin, 2004b; Milensky eta/., 2005;

InfoNatura, 2007; Restall et al., 2006), The record from

ESEC Grão-Pará Centre in particular (mid-winter, i.e. not

during the boreal migration season) suggests that C. virens

winters in the CNP in addition to passing through the area.

Contopus albogularís - White-throated Peewee

We recorded this species in the 'terra-firme' forest canopy at

FLOTA Trombetas, ESEC Grão-Pará South, REBIO Maicuru,

and FLOTA Paru, where it was rare to uncommon, and

detected mostly through its calls and song (Appendix); birds

were particularly active vocally at dawn and dusk, when

several individuais were tape-recorded at all sites above,

except FLOTA Paru. Our records are the first for the CNP

and more than doubled the known range of this Guiana

Shield endemic, extending its distribution ca. 400 km to the

Southwest; previous records included only Suriname, French

Guiana and northern and central Amapá in Brazil (Farnsworth

& Lebbin, 2004c; InfoNatura, 2007; Restall et al., 2006).

This species is probably ubiquitous in the canopy of 'terra-

firme' forest canopy throughout the CNP at least east ofthe

Trombetas river, but is easily overlooked by ornithologists

unfamiliar with its calls and song.

Mylarchus tyrannulus - Brown-crested Flycatcher

We recorded this species only at ESEC Grão-Pará

Centre, where two specimens were collected in open

25

ISciELO

2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

cm

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: (...) II. Avifauna

‘cerrado’, respectiveiy a female and a male: MPEG

66715 and 66716 (Appendix). This is the first CNP

record, extending significantl)' to the west the known

distribution of A^. tyrannulus on the Guiana Shield, where

it was previously known only from ‘cerrado’ patches

along the Amazon river valley, the State of Amapá, and

the Guianas (Joseph, 2004; InfoNatura, 2007; Restall

et al., 2006). We predict that this species will also be

found in other ‘cerrado’ enclaves throughout the CNP

Attila phoenicurus - Rufous-tailed Attila

On 28 and 29 August 2008, an individual of this austral

migrant was heard by AA at the same spot singing its song

shortly after dawn at ESEC Grão-Pará North in the canopy

of ‘terra-firme’ forest at ca. 500 m. No other individuais

were recorded during our stay at ESEC Grão-Pará North

or any of the other sites surveyed by us. This is the first

CNP record and the second for the Guiana Shield as a

whole (Milensky et al., 2005); prior to this record, A.

phoenicurus had been recorded on the Guiana Shield only

in Southern Venezuela, also as an austral migrant (Walther,

2004; InfoNatura, 2007; Restall et a/., 2006).

Neopelma pallescens - Pale-bellied Tyrant-Manakin

We recorded this species in ‘campina’ and dense ‘cerrado’

patches only at ESEC Grão-Pará South and Center, where

several individuais were tape-recorded and 14 collected

(MPEG 65482 - 65491 at ESEC Grão-Pará South and

MPEG 66717 - 66720 at ESEC Grão-Pará Centre; Figure

28; Appendix). Our records significantly extend the known

distribution of this species to the northeast on the CNP and

Guiana Shield, as it was thought previously to be mostly

restricted in this region to open vegetation areas along

the lower Amazon river valley (Snow, 2004a; InfoNatura,

2007; Restall et al., 2006), with a recently discovered

isolated population in Southern Guyana (Robbins et al.,

2004) and Southern Suriname (Mittermeier et al., 2010).

Based on its overall fair abundance in the appropriate

habitats in both sites in ESEC Grão-Pará sampled, we

predict that N. pallescens will be found in open vegetation

enclaves throughout the CNP (Snow, 2004a; Milensky et

al., 2005; Restall et a/., 2006).

Neopelma chrysocephalum - Saffron-cnested Tyrant-Manakin

We recorded this species only at FLOTA Faro, where

a single adult male was tape-recorded and collected

(MPEG 64769) atan active lekon 27January 2008 in the

understory of ‘campina’ white-sand forest near a creek

(Appendix). This is the first CNP record, significantly

extending the known range of N. chrysocephalum east

of the lower rio Negro drainage, where the nearest

previous records come from Manaus (Cohn-Haft

et al., 1997; Snow, 2004a; InfoNatura, 2007). Our

CNP surveys indicate that N. pallescens rather than N.

chrysocephalum is the widespread Tyrant-Manakin found

throughout the eastern part of the Guiana Shield (contra

Restall et ai, 2006); it is possible that those two species

associated with open forest enclaves replace each other

in the CNP across the Trombetas river, as reported in

this study (Appendix).

Machaeropterus pyrocephalus - Fiery-capped Manakin

We recorded this species only in the understory and

mid-levels of gallery forest at ESEC Grão-Pará Centre

where at least two individuais were tape-recorded

(Appendix). This is the second CNP record of M.

pyrocephalus after that of Novaes (1980) for the upper

Paru do Leste river (ca. 135 km to the northeast of ESEC

Grão-Pará Centre), where one male was collected

(MPEG 32548) also in gallery forest. These records

indicate a more widespread, yet patchy distribution on

the Guiana Shield than previously thought (Snow, 2004a;

InfoNatura, 2007; Restall et al., 2006). We predict

that M. pyrocephalus will be found in gallery forest at

other open vegetation enclaves throughout the CNR

and possibly also in Suriname and French Guiana, from

where there are currently no records (Snow, 2004a;

Milensky et al., 2005; Restall et al., 2006).

26

cm

,SciELO

2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Boi. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat., Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 11-65, jan.- abr. 2011

Xenopipo atronitens - Black Manakin

We recorded this species in the understory of 'campina'

and dense 'cerrado' patches only at ESEC Grão-Pará

South and Center, where several individuais were tape-

recorded and ten collected (MPEG 65513 - 65516 at

ESEG Grão-Pará South and MPEG 66721 - 66726 at

ESEG Grão-Pará Gentre; Appendix). Even though there

were previous records of X. atronitens for the GNR

our records extend significantly the known range of this

species on the Guiana Shield as a whole (Novaes, 1980;

Snow, 2004a: InfoNatura, 2007). Based on its overall

fair abundance in the appropriate habitats at both sites of

ESEG Grão-Pará sampled, we predict that X. atronitens

will be found in open vegetation enclaves throughout the

Guiana Shield, a pattern not reflected by maps portraying

the species' known distribution in key references such as

Snow (2004a) and InfoNatura (2007).

Oxyruncus cristatus - Sharpbill

On 10 September 2008 an individual of this species was

tape-recorded while joining a canopy mixed-species flock

in hilly 'terra-firme' forest at ESEG Grão-Pará North at ca.

500 m. Robbins et aí. (2007) also recorded O. cristatus

in the neighboring Acary mountains in Guyana. This is the

first GNP record, but we expect this species to be also

found in other high elevation sites along the State of Pará

borders with the Guianas and Amapá, where it has been

previously recorded (Brooke, 2004; InfoNatura, 2007;

Restall et al., 2006).

lodopleura fusca - Dusky Purpletuft

On 16 April 2008 a single individual of this Guiana Shield

endemic was heard and tape-recorded in the canopy of

'terra-firme' forest at ca. 500 m at FLOTA Trombetas while

joining a mixed-species flock; no other individuais were

recorded at this or any other site surveyed in the GNP

(Appendix). This record is the first for the GNR extending

significantly the known range of I. fusca, known in Brazil

only based on scattered records from Amapá, Manaus, and

Roraima (Snow, 2004b; InfoNatura, 2007). Therefore, our

record supports the notion that this species has a more

widespread yet very patchy distribution on the Guiana

Shield (Restall et al., 2006).

Pachyramphus viridis - Green-backed Becard

We tape-recorded this species once at FLOTA Trombetas

and ESEG Grão-Pará South and heard it twice at REBIO

Maicuru in the canopy of 'terra-firme' forest edge or

transition between 'terra-firme' and river-edge forests

(Appendix). Our records refer to the distinct subspecies

griseigularis, extending significantly to the north its

known distribution on the Guiana Shield (Mobley, 2004;

InfoNatura, 2007; Restall et al., 2006). This canopy-

dwelling species is easily overlooked due to its natural

scarcity and inconspicuous voice, but our GNP records

indicate that it is more widespread on the Guiana Shield

than previously thought, probably also occurring in

Suriname, French Guiana, and Amapá, from where there

are currently no records (Mobley, 2004; Milensky et al.,

2005; Restall et a/., 2006).

Hylophilus sclateri - Tepui Greenlet

We recorded this range-restricted species only in the

mid-levels and canopy of 'terra-firme' forest always in

mixed-species flocks around ca. 500 m at ESEG Grão-

Pará North, where it was common; several individuais

were tape-recorded (Appendix). This is the first GNP

record, but the species has also been recorded in the

neighboring Acary mountains in Guyana (Robbins etal.,

2007) and also in central Suriname (Zyskowski et al.,

2011). Therefore, H. sclateri most likely occurs along the

entire State of Pará border with Guyana and Suriname

at high elevation sites.

Atticora tibialis - White-thighed Swallow

On 21 january 2009, a single individual was obseiA/ed

perched in a tree at the edge of gallery forest at ESEG

Grão-Pará Gentre; no other individuais were recorded at

27

cm

SciELO

2 13 14 15 16 17 lí

19 20

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: (...) II. Avifauna

this or any other site surveyed in the CNP (Appendix). This

is the first CNP record, thus indicating a wider distribution

on the Guiana Shield than previously thought (Milensky et

al.. 2005; Restall etal., 2006).

Turdus leucomelas - Pale-breasted Thrush

We recorded this species in the understory of 'campina'

and 'cerrado' patches only at ESEC Grão-Pará South and

ESEC Grão-Pará Centre; one adult male was collected

at the latter site (MPEG 66741). Even though this

species has been recorded previously from other open

vegetation enclaves in the CNR our records extend

significantly to the north its known range in this region

(Milensky era/., 2005; Restall et al., 2006; InfoNatura,

2007); also, they indicate that T. leucomelas may be

found in open vegetation enclaves throughout the

Guiana Shield, a pattern not reflected by maps portraying

the species' known distribution in key references such

as Restall et al. (2006) and InfoNatura (2007).

Turdus ignobilis - Black-billed Thrush

We recorded this species in the understory of'campina'

and 'cerrado' patches only at ESEC Grão-Pará Centre,

where two individuais were tape-recorded and seven

collected (MPEG 66742 - 66747 and MPEG 66751); all

specimens belonged to the distinct subspecies arthurí,

endemictothe Guiana Shield (Collar, 2005). Our record

is the second one for the CNR after that in Milensky et

ai (2005), thus reinforcingthe significant southeastward

range extension of this endemic taxon on the Guiana

Shield (Restall et ai, 2006; InfoNatura, 2007). Eight

additional specimens of Turdus ignobilis arthurí (MPEG

69908 - 69915) were collected by Marcos Pérsio Dantas

Santos and crew in October 2009 in 'campina' at Lago

Sapucuá, municipality of Oriximiná, also in the CNP and

ca. 270 km south of ESEC Grão-Pará Centre. These

records indicate a much wider range in the CNP than

previously thought (Restall et al., 2006; InfoNatura,

2007; Collar, 2005).

Schistochiamys melanopis - Black-faced Tanager

We recorded this species only at ESEC Grão-Pará Centre,

where a few individuais were observed and three males

collected (MPEG 66758 - 66760) in open 'cerrado'

(Appendix). This record is the second for CNP after that

of Novaes (1980) for the upper Paru do Leste river (ca.

135 km to the northeast of ESEC Grão-Pará Centre),

where one male was collected (MPEG 32514) also in

'cerrado' (Isler & Isler, 1999).

Tachyphonus phoenicius - Red-shouldered Tanager

We recorded this species at all sites surveyed, except

FLOTA Faro and FLOTA Trombetas; tape-recordings

were obtained at ESEC Grão-Pará North and REBIO

Maicuru, while five males (MPEG 66763 and MPEG

66766 - 66769) and three females (MPEG 66762 and

MPEG 66764 - 66765) were collected at ESEC Grão-

Pará Centre, the only site where it was common (Figure

38; Appendix). Those records extend significantly the

known distribution of T. phoenicius on the CNP and

Guiana Shield (Isler & Isler, 1999); nearest CNP records

include those from Novaes (1980) for the upper Paru

do Leste river (ca. 85 km northwest of REBIO Maicuru)

and another reported by Isler & Isler (1999) for the

Amazonas/Pará border (ca. 280 km Southwest of ESEC

Grão-Pará South). The records presented here and

those from Novaes (1978, 1980), Isler & Isler (1999),

and Milensky et al. (2005) support the notion that T.

phoenicius is widely distributed on the Guiana Shield

in Brazil, apparently reaching higher densities in open

vegetation enclaves.

Tangara guttata - Speckled Tanager

AA on two occasions sighted 4-5 individuais of this species

while joining canopy mixed-species flocks in stunted

'campina' forest atop hill at ca. 450 m in ESEC Grão-

Pará South (Appendix); typically, canopy flocks joined

by T. guttata in stunted 'campina' forest at this site were

made up mostly of Thraupidae species such as dacnis

28

cm

,SciELO

2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Boi. Mus. Para. EmOio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat., Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 11-65, jan.- abr. 2011

{Dacnis spp.), honeycreepers {Chiorophanes spiza and

Cyanerpes spp.), and Tangara spp. tanagers. This is the

first CNP record for T. guttata, extending significantly to

the South the known distribution of this species (Isler &

Isler, 1999; Milenskyeta/., 2005; Restalleí a/., 2006); the

nearest previous records come from Suriname and French

Guiana (over 350 km to the north of ESEC Grão-Pará

South) where isolated and patchily distributed populations

associated with higher elevation sites have been recorded

(Restall et a/., 2006; Zyskowski et a/., 2011).

Tangara varia - Dotted Tanager

On 17 June 2008, M sighted six individuais of this species

while joining a canopy mixed-species flocks in stunted

campina' forest atop hill at ca. 450 m in ESEC Grão-Pará

South, when afemale was shot (MPEG 65541; Appendix);

other Thraupidae species such as dacnis {Dacnis spp.),

honeycreepers {Chiorophanes spiza and Cyanerpes spp.),

and Tangara spp. tanagers were in the same flock. This

is the first CNP record for T. varia, extending significantly

to the South the known distribution of this species (Isler

& Isler, 1999; Restall et a/., 2006); the nearest previous

records come from Suriname and French Guiana (over

350 km to the north of ESEC Grão-Pará South), where

isolated and patchly distributed populations associated

with higher elevation sites have been recorded (Isler &

Isler, 1999; Restall et a/., 2006; Robbins et a/., 2007).

Tangara cayana - Burnished-buff Tanager

We recorded this species only at FLOTA Trombetas in

‘terra-firme’ forest edge and ESEC Grão-Pará Centre

in gallery forest and open 'cerrado', where two males

(MPEG 66771 - 66772) and two females (MPEG

66773 - 66774) were collected (Figure 39; Appendix).

Even though this species has been recorded before in

the northeastern part of the CNP (Isler & Isler, 1999),

our records indicate a more widespread distribution in

this region than previously thought (Isler & Isler, 1999;

InfoNatura, 2007).

Tersina viridis - Swallow Tanager

We recorded this species only in river-edge forest border

at REBIO Maicuru and FLOTA Paru and in open 'cerrado'

at ESEC Grão-Pará Centre, where it was common and an

immature male was collected (MPEG 66777; Appendix).

This is the second CNP record, afterthatof Novaes (1980),

extending signifcantly to the southeastthe known distribution

of T viridis on the Guiana Shield (Isler & Isler, 1999; Restall

et ai, 2006; InfoNatura, 2007). Due to the preliminary

nature of this study, it is impossible to know whether our and

Novaes (1980) CNP records (all clustered between October

and Late January) indicate a seasonal movement pattern for

T. viridis in this part of the Guiana Shield, as verified in other

parts of northern South America (Isler & Isler, 1999).

Dacnis albiventris - White-bellied Dacnis

On 19 June 2008, AA shot anadult male (MPEG 65539) of

this species after spotting it in a canopy mixed-species flocks

in stunted forest atop hill at ca. 450 m in ESEC Grão-Pará

South (Figure 40; Appendix); other Thraupidae species

such as dacnis {Dacnis spp.), honeycreepers {Chiorophanes

spiza and Cyanerpes spp.), and Tangara spp. tanagers

were in the same flock. This is the first CNP record for

D. albiventris, extending significantly (over 1,000 km) to

the east the known distribution of this species, thought

previously to occur on the Guiana Shield only in Southern

Venezuela (Isler & Isler, 1999; Milenskyeta/., 2005; Restall

et al., 2006). Our record reinforces the patchy and local

nature of this species’ distribution throughout the Amazon

basin, apparently tied to stunted 'campina' patches (Isler &

Isler, 1999; Restall et a/., 2006).

Zonotrichia capensis - Rufous-collared Sparrow

We recorded this species only in open 'cerrado' at ESEC

Grão-Pará Centre, where one individual was tape-

recorded and another collected (MPEG 66778). Our new

record indicates a wider distribution in the CNP and the

Guiana Shield as a whole than previously thought (Restall

et ai, 2006; InfoNatura, 2007).

29

cm

SciELO

2 13 14 15 16 17 lí

19 20

*

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: (...) II. Avifauna

Sporophila crassirostris/maximiliani - Great/Large-billed

Seed-Finch

On 16 December2008, the territorial songofan individual

belonging eitherto Sporophila crassirostris or5. maximiliani

was heard briefly at a distance on the west bank of the Paru

river at FLOTA Paru. The area where the bird was heard

was covered by disturbed river-edge forest with tall grass

alongthe river banks; the bird was probably singing from a

nearby river island also covered by tall grass. Unfortunately,

the bird was not tape-recorded to allow for an accurate

species indentification. Both 5. crassirostris and 5. maximiliani

have been recorded throughout the eastern part of the

Guiana Shield (Milensky et al., 2005; InfoNatura, 2007),

thus rendering the distinction between them in the eastern

part of the CNP even more complicated when specimens

are lacking. In the neighbouring State of Amapá, where

both species have been documented with specimens,

5. crassirostris appears to be associated with 'cerrado',

whereas S. maximiliani was collected only in marshy

areas surrounded by forest (Novaes, 1978); similarly,

Haverschmidt & Mees (1994) recorded only 5. crassirostris

in the savannas of Southern Suriname. Therefore, ifthose

species are truly seggregated by major habitat types in this

part of the Guiana Shield, the FLOTA Paru record probably

refers to S. maximiliani, regarded as endangered throughout

Brazil (IBAMA, 2003) and locally in the State of Pará

(SEMA, 2007). Future studies should seekto identify with

certainty the local Great/Large seed-finch species occuring

in the eastern part of the CNP as well as evaluate the true

taxonomic and evolutionary independence between 5.

crassirostris and 5. maximiliani.

Piranga rubra - Summer Tanager

On 30 january 2009, a young male was shot by AA in open

'cerrado' at ESEC Grão-Pará Centre (MPEG 66770); this

specimen exhibits the typical more slender and light horn

bill color distinguishing P rubra from its congener F3epatic

Tanager Piranga flava, which is also known to occur in the

CNP and the Guiana Shield (Isler & Isler, 1999; Restall et

al., 2006). A few days before, on 21 january 2009, a male

Piranga tanager in full red plumage was spotted by AA in

open 'cerrado' at ESEC Grão-Pará South, but at such a

long distance that it prevented its specific identification with

certainty. The specimen collected represents the first CNP

record for R rubra, which is known to occur primarily along

the coast in the Guianas, thus extending significantly the

range of this boreal migrant inland on the Guiana Shield

(Isler & Isler, 1999; Restall eí al., 2006). Our record and

those available in the literature (Isler & Isler, 1999; Restall et

ai, 2006) indicate that both R rubra anàP flava may occur

syntopically in 'cerrado' enclaves on the Guiana Shield at

leastduringthe boreal winter, thus underscoringthe need of

caution when identifyingR/ra/ig-a tanagers seen in this region.

Parula pitiayumi - Tropical Parula

We recorded this species only on ridgetops at ca. 500 m in

ESEC Grão-Pará North, REBIO Maicuru, and FLOTA Paru;

several individuais were tape-recorded at ESEC Grão-Pará

North and REBIO Maicuru (Appendix). These are the first

documented records for the CNR with previous nearest

records coming from the Acary mountains in Guyana

(Blake, 1950; Robbins et al., 2007), western Suriname

(Restall et al., 2006), French Guiana and northern Amapá

(Milensky et al., 2005; InfoNatura, 2007). Our records

extend significantly to the south the known distribution of

Rpitiayumi on the Guiana Shield, where it is found always

at higher elevations, including isolated mountain ranges

covered by forest.

CONSERVATION IMPLICATIONS

Among all 446 species recorded by us throughout the

flve CNP conservation units sampled, 74 (16.6%) can be

regarded as of special interest for conservation because

of their status, i.e. threatened, endemic, rare, range-

restricted, and persecuted by hunters (Appendix). Most

(41) of those species are endemic to the Guiana Shield

(Appendix), and represent 73.5% of the total number of

endemics recognized for the Guiana area of endemism by

30

SciELO

2 13 14 15 16 17 If

19 20

cm

(

Boi. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat, Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 11-65, jan.- abr. 2011

Stotz et al. (1996), thus underscoring the importance of

the CNP conseiA/ation units sampled for the conservation

of those species, which can only be preserved in this

part of the world. Twenty other species are patchily

distributed, local, and rare in the Amazon, and therefore

also require special attention (Appendix); some of them

such as Crypturellus erythropus (Tinamidae) and Tachyphonus

phoenidus (Thraupidae) are locally common, whereas

others such as Phytlomyias gríseiceps (Tyrannidae) and

Pachyramphus surinamus (Tityridae) have been recorded

at most sites sampled. Migratory and commonly hunted

species account, respectively, for seven and five of the

total species of special interestfor conservation recorded

(Appendix); except for Attila phoenicurus (Tyrannidae),

all migratory species observed were wintering North

American migrants, thus showing the importance of the

conservation units sampled for the preservation of birds

well beyond the CNP and northern South America. Only

two of those species of special interest for conservation

are regarded as threatened by the Brazilian federal

goverment and the State of Pará, and therefore afford

official protection status: Aratinga maculata (Psittacidae) and

Sporophila crassirostris/maximiliani (Emberizidae); the CNP

conservation units where populations of those two species

have been recorded (FLOTA Trombetas, ESEC Grão-Pará,

and FLOTA Paru) are therefore of criticai importance for

the consolidation of management and recovery plans for

them (Appendix). Finally, Morphnusguianensis (Accipitridae)

is regarded as Near-threatened by lUCN (2010) and was

recorded at most sites sampled (Figure 2; Appendix).

It is now clear that the conservation units surveyed

harbor a large number of bird species, including a significant

number of those of special conservation interest. This

is mostly because the sampled conservation units are

connected, and covertogether over 13.2 million ha (Avila-

Pires et al., 2010) within the least deforested sector of

Brazilian Amazônia (Fearnside, 2005; Silva et al., 2005).

Farmers and cattle ranchers have remained conspicuously

absent from most of the CNR but this situation may change

with the fast economic expansion and high number of

development projects planned for the Brazilian Amazon

(Allegretti, 2006; Smeraldi, 2006). Several new roads are

planned for the CNP (Allegretti, 2006; Smeraldi, 2006),

where one of the largest bauxite deposits recorded to date

has been discovered, mostly within ESEC Grão-Pará (the

largest unit of the conservation mosaic; Avila-Pires et a/.,

2010), the limits of which now are being disputed (Milanez,

2009). Ironically, bauxite deposits at ESEC Grão-Pará are

clustered in its Southern part, where they seem associated

with table shaped ridges at altitudes around 500 m and

the tops of which are covered by a mix of 'campina' and

'cerradão' (Rgure 46) and where a significant number of

bird species of special conservation interest were found,

mmely Aratinga maculata (Psrttaddae), Hemitriccus inornatus

and EJaenia ruficeps (Tyrannidae), Tachyphonus phoenidus,

Tangaraguttata, Tangara varia, and Dacnis albiventris (Figures

38 and 40; Thraupidae); in fact, the latter three species

were recorded only on those ridge tops and are probably

dependent on this habitat for sun/ival (Appendix).

Because the original biota of the CNP is still nearly

intact, future development plans for this part of Amazônia

should take advantage of this unique oportunity so as

not to repeat the same destructive approach towards

the environment practiced in other parts of the State of

Pará, which have resulted in many species currently being

regarded as threatened (Albernaz & Avila-Pires, 2009). A

decisive step in that direction is to take into account the

unique attributes of the CNP biodiversity components,

such as those for the birds reported above, when designing

long-term sustainable development policies for this region.

CONCLUSIONS

Oren (2001) regarded the Southern part of the Guiana

Shield (including the CNP) as one of the least sampled

areas in the Brazilian Amazon. The results presented here

have significantly improved the knowledge on the avifauna

of this region, complementing studies already available for

neighboring areas, namely the Brazilian States of Amapá

31

cm i

SciELO

2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

*

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: (...) II. Avifauna

(Novaes, 1974, 1978) and Roraima (Naka et aL, 2006),

and the countries of Guyana, Suriname, and French Guiana

(Tostain et a/., 1992; Haverschmidt & Mees, 1994; Braun

et a/., 2000; Milensky et a/,, 2005; Restall et a/., 2006;

Zyskowski et a/,, 2011). Supportingthis conclusion isthefact

that out of the 446 species recorded during our surveys,

62 consisted of important range extensions for the Guiana

Shield, many of which were recorded for the first time in

the CNP (see above).

Our annotated check-list also underscores the

heterogeneous nature of the CNP landscape, where the

composition and number of species recorded at each site

varied significantiy according to the local existence and

steepness of altitudinal and vegetational (forest/ cerrado' and

seasonally-flooded/upland forest) gradients (Appendix). The

eastAvest break in the composition ofthe ‘cerrado' avifauna

onthe Guiana Shield discussed by Mittermeiereta/. (2010)

is also documented here for ‘terra-firme’ species, with

the Trombetas river apparently coinciding with this major

avifaunal disjunction. We found atypical ‘terra-firme' avifauna

east ofthe Trombetas riverthat included many Guiana Shield

endemics also restricted to Suriname, French Guiana, and

the Brazilian State of Amapá; on the other hand, most species

recorded only west of this river are also found in Guyana,

Venezuela, and the States of Roraima and Amazonas in Brazil.

Mittermeier et al. (2010) suggest that climatic-vegetational

cycles creating a forest corrridor that once separated the

Amapá/Suriname and the GuyanaAfenezuela/Roraima

savannas could have been responsible forthe biogeographic

breakthey documented forthe ‘cerrado' species. The fact

that the 'terra-firme' break in species composition shown

here coincided in location with that observed for 'cerrado'

species suggest that other mechanisms such as geological

events might probably be involved as well. Future multi-

disciplinary work involving biogeographers, geologists,

and paleoclimatologists should clarify the spatio-temporal

events associated with this major east/west break in species

composition documented for both ‘cerrado’ and 'terra-firme'

avifaunas on the Guiana Shield.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We dedicate this paper to the memory of Arlindo Pinto

de Souza Júnior who joined us on all trips to prepare

mammal specimens; his sense of humor, charisma, and

passion for natural history will be forever missed. We

thank José Nílton da Silva Santa Brígida for preparing most

of the bird specimens collected during the surveys and

Jucinaldo da Silva (‘Locutor’) for deligently helping us set up

and run mist-nets. We are also indebted to José Leite da

Silva (‘Cumaru’) for occasionally collecting interesting bird

specimens. Conservação Internacional (Cl-Brasil) financed

research equipment and supplies, air travei from Belém

to Santarém and Boa Vista, the costs of the boat for the

FLOTA Faro expedition, subsistence costs of all expeditions,

as well as salaries and stipends to all field workers and most

researchers. As conditioned by the mining research license

given by the Secretaria de Estado de Meio Ambiente do

Pará (SEMA-PA), Rio Tinto (exploring for bauxite in the

area) covered all costs regarding logistics from Santarém

and Boa Vista to the campsites, and took care of opening

up heliports, mounting and disassembling camps, flying in

and out personnel, food and material, and removing all

extraneous material from the campsites. SEMA-Pará also

provided logistical and legal support, issuing the collecting

permit used throughout this study (#001/2008). Sidnei

M. Dantas helped with the cluster analysis in Figure 45.

Two anonymous referees and the associate Editor made

valuable suggestions to this paper. AA also thanks the

Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq) for a research

fellowship (grant # 310593/2009-3) and “Instituto Nacional

de Ciência e Tecnologia (INCT) em Biodiversidade e Uso

da Terra da Amazônia" (CNPq grant # 574008/2008-0)

for support to his research. FP thanks “Rede Clima’’ for a

research fellowship (CNPq grant # 371740/2009-6). MC

expresses gratitude to Cl-Brasil for financial support during

the project. EP thanks “INCT em Biodiversidade e Uso da

Terra da Amazônia" for a research fellowship (CNPq grant #

383939/2009-7). LSM is supported by a Master's fellowship

from CNPq (grant # 133320/2009-0).

igOSi —*-

32

2 3 4 5 6 7

SciELO

2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

cm

(

Boi. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat, Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 11-65, jan,- abr. 2011

-C, "O dJ

^ I

i w

ON rs

O P

CO ^

LO m

LO LO

U ■

U :

rsi

TJ

b 0)

í b

'2 LO

te

..n X)

i3 y

LO to

<u

e S

U

LO ÍN

cm

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará. Brazil: (...) II. Avifauna

Figure 3. Phaethornisruber(Jrodn\\\daé). REBIO Maicuru. Photo: MC.

Figure 5. MC retrieves a Chioroceryle aenea (Alcedinidae) caught in

a mist-net at ESEC Grâo-Para North. Photo: Adriano Gambarini.

Rgure 6. Momotus momota (Monnotidae), ESEC Grão-Pará South. Figure 7. Galbula albirostris (Galbulidae), ESEC Grão-Pará North

Photo: MC. Photo: Adriano Gambarini.

cm

SciELO

Figure 2. Morphnus guianensis (Accipitridae). atop a tree at ESEC

Grão-Pará North. Photo: Adriano Gambarini.

Figure 4. Thalurania furcata (Trochilidae), female, one of the

commonest hummingbirds in the CNR ESEC Grão-Pará North.

Photo: Adriano Gambarini.

Boi. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat., Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 11-65, jan.- abr. 2011

9 ^

Figure 8. Bucco tamatia (Bucconiidae), FLOTA Trombetas. Photo: MC

Figure 9. Malacoptila fusca (Bucconiidae), ESEC Grão-Para North

Photo; MC,

Figure 10. Monasa atra (Bucconiidae), ESEC Grão-Para South.

Photo: MC.

Figure 11. Picumnus exilis (Picidae), male, REBIO Maicuru. Photo: Figure 12. Celeus eiegans (Picidae), ESEC Grâo-Pará Centre. Photo

MC. Adriano Gambarini.

,SciEL0

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: (...) II. Avifauna

Figure 14. Hypocnemis cantator (Thamnophilidae), female, ESEC

Grão-Pará South. Photo: MC.

Figure 16. Myrmedza ferruginea (Thamnophilidae), male, FLOTA

Trombetas. Photo: MC.

hgure 17. Pithys albifrons (Thamnophilidae), ESEC Grão-Pará North. Figure 18, Gymnopithysrufigula (Thamnophilidae), male, ESEC Grão

Photo: Adriano Gambarini. Pará South. Photo: MC.

cm

.SciELO

Figure 13. Myrmotherula guttata (Thamnophilidae), male, ESEC

Grão-Pará South. Photo: MC.

Rgure 15. Schistodchia leucostigma (Thamnophilidae), female, REBIO

Maicuru. Photo: MC.

cm i

Boi. Mus, Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat,, Belém, v, 6, n. 1, p. 11-65, jan.- abr. 2011

Figure 19. Hylophylaxnaevius (Thamnophilidae), male, ESEC Grâo-

Pará North. Photo: Adriano Gambarini.

Figure 20. WilUsornis poediinotus (Thamnophilidae), female, ESEC

Grão-Pará South. Photo: MC.

Rgure 21. Sderurus rufigularís (Scleruridae), ESEC Grão-Pará South.

Photo: MC.

Figure 22. Xiphorhynchus pardalotus (Dendrocolaptidae), ESEC

Grão-Pará North. Photo: Adriano Gambarini,

Figure 23. Campylorhamphus procurvoides (Dendrocolaptidae),

FLOTA Trombetas. Photo: MC.

Figure 24. Automolus rufipileatus (Furnariidae), REBIO Maicuru.

Photo: MC.

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: (...) II. Avifauna

Figure 26. Ramphotrigon ruficauda (Tyrannidae), ESEC Grão-Pará

South. Photo: MC.

Rgure 28. Neopeíma pallescens (Pipridae), ESEC Grão-Pará South.

Photo: MC.

Rgure 25. Corythopis torquatus (Tyrannidae), ESEC Grão-Pará South.

Photo: MC.

Figure 27. Phoenicircus carnifex (Cotingidae), female, FLOTA

Trombetas. Photo: MC.

Rgure 29. Corapipo gutturalis (Pipridae), ESEC Grão-Pará Centre. Rgure 30. Lepidothrix serena (Pipridae), female, ESEC Grão-Pará

Photo: Silvia Jane de S. dos Santos. North, Photo: MC.

cm

cSciELO

2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Boi. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi. Gene. Nat., Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 11-65, jan.- abr, 2011

Figure 35, Pipra aureola (Pipridae), male, FLOTA Paru. Photo: Figure 36. Pipra erythrocephala (Pipridae), male, ESEC Grão-Pará

MC. South. Photo: MC.

Figure 31. Lepidothrix serena (Pipridae), male, ESEC Grão-Pará

North, Photo: MC.

Figure 33. Dixiphia pipra (Pipridae), male, ESEC Grão-Pará South.

Photo: MC.

Figure 32. Chiroxiphia pareola (Pipridae), male, ESEC Grão-Pará

South. Photo: MC.

Figure 34. Dixiphia pipra (Pipridae), female, ESEC Grão-Pará South.

Photo: MC.

cm

.SciELO

2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil; (...) II. Avifauna

Figure 41. HydropsaUs torquata (Caprimulgidae), a typical cerrado Figure 42. Ga/Du/a/eucogas£ra(Galbulidae), ESEC Grâo-Pará Centre

species found only at ESEC Grâo-f4rá Centre during our surveys. Photo: Adriano Gambarini.

Photo: Adriano Gambarini.

cm

SciELO

Rgure 39. Tangara cayana (Thraupidae), ESEC Grão-FVá Centre. Photo:

Silvia Jane de S. dos Santos.

Rgure 40. Dacnis albiventris (Thraupidae), male, ESEC Grão-Fbrá South.

Photo: MC. This bird was prepared as a study skin (MPEG 65539).

Figure 38. Tachyphonusphoenidus (Thraupidae), male

Pará Centre. Photo: Silvia Jane de S. dos Santos.

Rgure 37. Tachyphonus surinamus (Thraupidae), female, ESEC Grão

Pará Centre. Photo: Silvia Jane de S. dos Santos.

ESEC Grão-

Boi. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat., Belém, v. 6, n. 1. p. 11-65, jan.- abr. 2011

■w-

Figure 43. Todirostrum cinereum (Tyrannidae), ESEC Grão-Pará Figure44.Sctetoc/r/amysme/anop/s(Thraupidae), male, ESECGrão-

Centre. Photo: Adriano Gambarini. Pará Centre. Photo: Adriano Gambarini.

Figure 45. Cluster analysis of similarity in species composition across the seven CNP sites sampled based on presence-absence data of 446

species (cophenetic correlation obtained: 0.8787). Distances were calculated with the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity Index which varies between 0

and 1 . Key to the sites: GP - N (ESEC Grão-Pará North), Trombetas (FLOTA Trombetas), GP - S (ESEC Grâo-Pará South), Maicuru (REBIO

Maicuru), Fáru (FLOTA Paru), Faro (FLOTA Faro), and GP - C (ESEC Grão-Pará Centre).

41

cm i

SciELO

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: (...) II. Avifauna

Rgure 46. View of the stunted forest mix of 'campina' and 'cerradão' growing on table shaped ridges at altitudes around 500 m at ESEC

Grão-Pará South (airstrip Estanifera, Rio Curuá), where some bird species of special conservation interest were found (see text for details).

Photo: FR

REFERENCES

ALBERNAZ, A. L. K. M. & T C. S. AVILA-PIRES, 2009. Espécies

ameaçadas de extinção e áreas críticas para a biodiversidade

no Pará: 1-54. Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi and Conservation

Internacional, Belém.

ALEIXO, A., 2009. Knowledge gaps, research priorities, and

future perspectives on bird conservation in the Brazilian Amazon.

In: A. C. DE LUÇA, R E. DEVELEY, G. A. BENCKE & J. M.

GOERCK (Eds.): Áreas importantes para a conservação das

aves no Brasil. Parte II - Amazônia, Cerrado e Pantanal: 55-69.

SAVE Brasil, São Paulo.

ALLEGRETTi, R. E, 2006. Do Avança Brasil ao PPA de Lula: o que

mudou do ponto de vista ambiental na agenda do desenvolvimento

da Amazônia. Ciência & Ambiente 32:15-34.

AVID\-PIRES, T C. S., M. S. HOOGMOED & W. A. ROCHA, 2010.

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: a forgotten part of

the Guiana Region, I. Herpetofauna, Boletim do Museu Paraense

Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Naturais 5(1): 13-112.

BLAKE, E. R., 1950. Birds of the Acary Mountains Southern British

Guiana. Fieldiana: Zoology 32: 419-474.

BRAUN, M. J., D. W. FINCH, M. B. ROBBINS & B. K. SCHIMIDT

2000. A field checklist of the birds of Guyana. Smithsonian

Institution, Washington.

BRAUN, M. J., M, B. ROBBINS, C. M. MILENSKY B. J. 0’SHEA,

B. R. BARBER, W. HINDS & W. S. PRINCE, 2003. New birds for

Guyana from Mts. Roraima and Ayanganna. Bulletin of the British

Ornithological Club 123(1): 24-33.

BROOKE, M. L., 2004. Oxyruncus chstatus. In: J. DEL HOYO,

A. ELLiOT & D. CHRlSTlÉ (Eds.): Handbook of Birds of the

World: Cotingasto Pipits and Wagtails: v. 9: 73. Lynx Edicions,

Barcelona.

CBRO, 2009. Comitê Brasileiro de Registros Ornitológicos, Lista

das aves do Brasil. 8nd edition. Available at: <http:///Avw.cbro.

org.br/CBRO/listabr.htm>. Accessed on: 21 April 2010,

CLOCK, B, M., 2004. Hemitriccus inornatus. In: J, DEL HOYO, A.

ELLIOT & D. CHRISTlE (Eds.): Handbook of Birds of the World:

Cotingas to Pipits and Wagtails: v. 9: 324. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.

COHN-HAFT M., A. WHITTAKER & R C. STOUFFER, 1997. A

new look at the "species-poor" central Amazon: the avifauna north

of Manaus, Brazil, Ornithological Monographs 48: 205-235.

ISOSI —►

42

,SciELO

Boi. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat, Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 11-65, jan.- abr. 2011

COLLAR, N, J,, 2005. Family Turdidae (thrushes). In: J. DEL

HOYO, A. ELLIOT & D. CHRISTIE (Eds.): Handbook of Birds

of the World: Cuckoo-shrikes to Thrushes: v. 10: 514-807. Lynx

Edicions, Barcelona.

COLWELL, R. K., 2009. EstimateS: statistical estimation of

species richness and shared species from samples. Version 8.2.0.

Available at: <http://www.purl.oclc.org/estimates>. Accessed on:

21 April 2010.

CRACRAFT, J., 1985. Historical biogeography and patterns

of differentiation within the South American avifauna: areas of

endemism. Ornithological Monographs 36: 49-84.

FARNSWORTH, A. & D. J. LEBBIN, 2004a. Myiophobus fasdatus.

In: J. DEL HOYO, A. ELLIOT & D, CHRISTIE (Eds,): Handbook

of Birds of the World: Cotingas to Pipits and Wagtails: v, 9: 348.

Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.

FARNSWORTH, A. & D. J. LEBBIN, 2004b. Contopus virens. In:

J. DEL HOYO, A. ELLIOT & D. CHRISTIE (Eds.): Handbook of

Birds of the World: Cotingas to Pipits and Wagtails: v. 9: 369. Lynx

Edicions, Barcelona.

FARNSWORTH, A. & D. J. LEBBIN, 2004c. Contopus albogularis.

In: J. DEL HOYO, A. ELLIOT & D. CHRISTIE (Eds.): Handbook

of Birds of the World: Cotingas to Pipits and Wagtails: v. 9: 371.

Lynx Edicions, Barcelona,

FEARNSIDE, R M., 2005. Deforestation in Brazilian Amazônia:

history, rates, and consequences. Conservation Biology 19(3):

680-688.

FITZPATRICK, J. W, 2004a. Leptopogon amaurocephalus. In: J. DEL

HOYO, A. ELLIOT & D, CHRISTIE (Eds.): Handbook of Birds of

the World: Cotingas to Pipits and Wagtails: v. 9: 307. Lynx Edicions,

Barcelona.

FITZPATRICK, J. W, 2004b. Myiopagis caniceps. In: J. DEL HOYO,

A. ELLIOT & D, CHRISTIE (Eds.): Handbook of Birds of the

World: Cotingas to Pipits and Wagtails: v. 9: 265. Lynx Edicions,

Barcelona.

FITZPATRICK, J. W., 2004c. Myiopagis flavivertex. In: J. DEL HOYO,

A. ELLIOT & D. CHRISTIE (Eds.): Handbook of Birds of the World:

Cotingas to Pipits and Wagtails: v. 9: 266. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.

FITZPATRICK, J. W, 2004d. Phylloscartes virescens. In: J. DEL

HOYO, A. ELLIOT & D. CHRISTIE (Eds,): Handbook of Birds of

the World: Cotingas to Pipits and Wagtails: v. 9: 300. Lynx Edicions,

Barcelona.

FITZPATRICK, J. W, 2004e. Inezia subflava. In: J. DEL HOYO, A.

ELLIOT & D. CHRISTIE (Eds.): Handbook of Birds of the World:

Cotingas to Pipits and Wagtails: v, 9: 312. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.

FORSHAW, J. M., 2006. Parrots of the World: An Identification

Guide: 1-584. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

GIBBS, A. K. & C. N. BARRON, 1993. The geology of the Guiana

Shield. Oxford University Press, New York.

GRISCOM, L. & J. C. GREENWAY JR., 1941. Birds of lower

Amazônia. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology

88(3): 83-344.

HAFFER, J., 1974. Avian speciation in tropical South America. With

a systematic survey of the toucans (Ramphastidae) and jacamars

(Galbulidae). Publications of the Nuttall Ornithological Club 14:1-390.

HAMMER, O., D. A, T. HARPER & R D. RYAN, 2001. PAST:

Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data

Analysis. Palaeontologia Electrónica 4(1): 1-9.

HAVERSCHMIDT, F&G. F MEES, 1994. Birds of Suriname: 1-578.

VACO Press, Paramaribo.

HERZOG, S. K,, M. KESSLER & T M. CAHILL, 2002. Estimating

species richness of tropical bird communrties from rapid assessment

data. The Auk 119: 749-769.

HOSNER, RA.,2004.eaen/ar!;^c^s. ln:J. DEL HOYO, A. ELLIOT

& D. CHRISTIE (Eds.): Handbook of Birds of the World: Cotingas

to Ripits and Wagtails: v. 9: 272. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.

IBAMA, 2003. Instituto Brasileiro do Meio/Vnbiente e dos Recursos

Naturais Renováveis. Lista nacional da fauna brasileira ameaçada

de extinção. Available at: <http:/Awvw.mma.gov.br/port/sbfAauna/

index.cfm>. Accessed on: 21 /kpril 2010.

INFONATURA, 2007. Animais and Ecosystems of Latin America.

Version 5.0. NatureServe. Ariington. Available at: <http://www.

natureserve.org/infonatura>. Accessed on: 21 April 2010.

ISLER, M. L. & R R. ISLER, 1999. The Tanagers: natural history,

distribution and identiflcation: 1-406. Smithsonian Institution, Washington.

ISLER, M, L.,J.ALVAREZALONSO, RR. ISLER&B. M. WHITNEY

2001. A review of the Percnostola rufifrons complex (Rasseriformes:

Thamnophilidae) with description of a new species from northern

Amazonian Reru. The Wilson Bulletin 113(2): 164-176.

lUCN, 2010. International Union for Conservation ofNature. lUCN

Red List of Threatened Species. Available at: < http://www.redlist.

org/>. Accessed on: 21 April 2010.

JOSERH, L., 2004. Myiarchus tyrannulus. In: J. DEL HOYO, A.

ELLIOT & D, CHRISTIE (Eds,): Handbook of Birds of the World:

Cotingas to Ripits and Wagtails: v. 9: 438. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.

MARANTZ, C. A., A. ALEIXO, A. L. BEV1ER& M. A. PATTEN, 2003.

Family Dendrocolaptidae (woodcreepers). In: J. DEL HOYO, A.

ELLIOT & D, CHRISTIE (Eds,): Handbook of Birds of the World:

Broadbills to Tapaculos: v, 8: 358-447. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.

MILANEZ, F, 2009. A outra margem do rio, National Geographic

Magazine 114: 44-61.

43

cm i

cSciELO^

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: (,,,) 11. Avifauna

MILENSKY, C. M., H, WILTSHIRE, A. ALEIXO & M. E C. LIMA,

2005. Birds. In: T HOLLOWELL & R, R REYNOLDS (Eds.):

Checklist of the Terrestrial Vertebrates of the Guiana Shield. Bulletin

of the Biological Society of Washington (13): 43-73.

MITTERMEIER, J. C., K. ZYSKOWSKI, E. S. STOWE & J. E. LAI,

2010. Avifauna of the Sipaliwini savanna (Suriname) with insights

into rts biogeographic affinities. Bulletin of the Peabody Museum

of Natural History 51(1): 97-122.

MOBLEY, J. A., 2004. Pachyramphus viridis. In: J. DEL HOYO, A.

ELLIOT & D. CHRISTIE (Eds.): Handbook of Birds of the World:

Cotingasto Pipits and Wagtails: v. 9: 453. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.

MORITZ, C., J. L. PATTON, C. J. SCHNEIDER & T B. SMITH,

2000. Diversification of rainforest faunas: An integrated molecular

approach, Annual ReviewofEcologyandSystematics31: 533-563.

NAKA, L. N., M. COHN-HAFT E MALLET-RODRIGUES, M. R D.

SANTOS & M. E TORRES, 2006, The avifauna of the Brazilian State

of Roraima: bird distribution and biogeography in the Rio Branco

basin. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 14(3): 197-238.

NEMÉSIO, A. & C. RASMUSSEN, 2009. The rediscovery of

Bufforfs "Guarouba''or "Perriche jaune”: two sénior synonyms of

Aratinga pintoi Silveira, Lima & Hõfling, 2005 (Aves: Psittaciformes).

Zootaxa 2013:1-16.

NOVAES, E C., 1974. Ornitologia do Território do Amapá I.

Publicações Avulsas do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeidi 25:1-121.

NOVAES, E C., 1978. Ornitologia do Território do Amapá II.

Publicações Avulsas do Museu Paraense Emílio GoeIdi 29: 1-75.

NOVAES, E C,, 1980. Observações sobre a avifauna do alto curso

do Rio Paru do Leste, Estado do Pará. Boletim do Museu Paraense

Emílio Goeidi, série Zoologia 100: 1-58.

OREN, D. C., 2001. Biogeografia e conservação de aves na região

amazônica. In: J. R CAPOBIANCO, A. VERÍSSIMO, A. L. MOREIRA,

D. SAWYER, 1. SANTOS & L. R S. PINTO (Eds,): Biodiversidade

na Amazônia brasileira: avaliação e ações prioritárias para a

conservação, uso sustentável e repartição de benefícios: 97-109.

Instituto Socioambiental, São Paulo.

PACHECO, J. E & E OLMOS, 2006. As aves do Tocantins 1: região

sudeste. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 14: 55-71.

REMSEN JR., J. V, 2003. Family Fumariidae (ovenbirds). In: J. DEL

HOYO, A. ELLIOT & D. CHRISTIE (Eds.): Handbook of Birds of the

World: BroadbillstoTãpaculos: v. 8:162-357. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.

REMSEN JR., j. V, C. D. CADENA, A. JARAMILLO, M. NORES,

J. E PACHECO, M. B. ROBBINS, T S. SCHULENBERG, F. G.

STILES, D. E STOTZ & K. J. ZIMMER, 2010. A classification of

the bird species of South America. American Ornithologists'

Union. Available at: <http://vvww.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/

SACCBaseline.html>. Accessed on: 21 April 2010.

RESTALL, R., C. RODNER & M. LENTINO, 2006. Birds of

Northern South America: An Identification Guide. v. 1:1-880. Yale

University Press, New Haven and London.

RIDGELY R. S. & G. TUDOR, 1994, The birds of South America,

V. 2: 1-814. University of Texas Press, Austin.

ROBBINS, M. B. & T A. PARKER III, 1997. Voice and taxonomy of

Caprimulgus (rufus) otiosus (Caprimulgidae), with a reevaluation of

Caprimulgusrufüssuhspecies. Omithological Monographs 48:601-607.

ROBBINS, M. B., M, J. BRAUN & D. W. FINCH, 2004. Avifauna

of the Guyana Southern Rupununi, with comparisons to other

savannas of northern South America. Ornitologia Neotropical

15: 173-200,

ROBBINS, M. B., M. J. BRAUN, C. M, MILENSKY B. K, SCHMIDT,

W. PRINCE, N. H. RICE, D. W. FINCH & B. j. 0'SHEA, 2007.

Avifauna of the upper Essequibo river and Acary mountains, Southern

Guyana. Ornitologia Neotropical 18(3): 339-368.

ROBINSON, S. K. & J. TERBORGH, 1997, Bird community

dynamics along primary sucessional gradients of an Amazonian

whitewater river. Omithological Monographs 48: 641-672.

SCHUCHMANN, K.-L., 1999. Family Trochilidae (Hummingbirds).

In: J. DEL HOYO, A. ELLIOT & D, CHRISTIE (Eds.): Handbook of

Birds of the World: Barn-owls to Hummingbirds: v. 5: 468-680.

Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.

SEMA, 2007. Secretaria de Estado de Meio Ambiente. Lista de

espécies da flora e da fauna ameaçadas no Estado do Pará.

Available at: <http://www.sema.pa.gov.br/resolucoes_detalhes.

php?idresolucao=54>. Accessed on: 21 April 2010.

SILVA, j. M. C., 1995. Birds of the cerrado region, South America.

Steenstrupia 21(2): 69-92.

SILVA, J. M. C., A. B. RYLANDS & G. A, B. FONSECA, 2005. The

fate of the Amazonian areas of endemism, Conservation Biology

19(3): 689-694.

SILVEIRA, L. E, E C. T LIMA & E. HÕFLING, 2005. A new species

oí Aratinga parakeet (Psittaciformes: Psittacidae) from Brazil, with

taxonomic remarks on the Aratinga solstitialis complex. The Auk

122(1): 292-305.

SMERALDI, R., 2006. PPA 2004-2007 e obras de infraestrutura na

Amazônia. Ciência & Ambiente 32: 35-44.

SNOW, D. W, 2004a. Family Pipridae (manakins). In: j. DEL

HOYO, A. ELLIOT & D. CHRISTIE (Eds.): Handbook of Birds

of the World: Cotingas to Pipits and Wagtails: v. 9: 110-169. Lynx

Edicions, Barcelona.

SNOW, D. W., 2004b. lodopleura fusca. In: ]. DEL HOYO, A

ELLIOT & D, CHRISTIE (Eds.): Handbook of Birds of the World:

Cotingas to Pipits and Wagtails: v. 9: 87. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.

44

cm

,SciELO

2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Boi. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat., Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p, 11-65, jan.- abr. 2011

STOTZ, D. R, J, W. FITZPATRICK, T A. PARKER III & D. K.

MOSKOVITS, 1996. Neotropical birds: Ecology and Conservation,

The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

TOSTAIN, O., J.-L. DUJARDIN, C. H. ÉRARD & J.-M.

THIOLLAY 1992. Oiseaux de Guyane: 1-222, Société d'Études

Ornithologiques, Brunoy.

WALTHER, B. A., 2004, AttUa phoenicurus. In: J. DEL HOYO, A,

ELLIOT & D. CHRISTIE (Eds.): Handbook of Birds of the World:

Cotingas to Pipits and Wagtails: v. 9: 444. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.

ZIMMER, K. J. & A. WHITTAKER, 2000. Species limits in Pale-tipped

Tyrannulets (/nez/a: Tyrannidae). The Wilson Bulletin 112(1): 51-66.

ZIMMER, K. J. & M. L. ISLER, 2003. Family Thamnophilidae (typical

antbirds). In: J. DEL HOYO, A. ELLIOT & D. CHRISTIE (Eds.):

Handbook of Birds of the World. Broadbilis to Tapaculos: v. 8:

448-681. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.

ZYSKOWSKI, K., J. C. MITTERMEIER, O. OTTEMA, M, RAKOVIC,

B. J. 0'SHEA, J. E. LAI, S. B. HOCHGRAR J. DE LEÓN & K,

AU, 2011, Avifauna of the easternmost tepui, Tafelberg in central

Suriname. Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History,

Yale University 52(1): 153-180,

H——»-

45

cm i

cSciELO^

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

APPENDIX. Checklist of birds recorded during 96 days between January 2008 and January 2009 at seven localities in the 'Calha Norte Paraense’

(CNP), an area comprisingthe territory ofthe Brazilian State of Pará situated north ofthe Amazon river (see Rgure 1). Nomenclature and taxonomy

follow the Brazilian Check-list Committee (CBRO 2009).

___ (Continued)

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: (...) II. Avifauna

E

£

rd

z

'C

.§ z

u

'C

£ s

o £

'C u

'C

rí® -c

,o o

'2 l/r

O)

X!

E

p

g

.rJ

,

0

u

LL.-

H

Ü

ü

R, TF

1 -

LLT

H

D

0

u

Lir

1-

3

C, TF-1, Cc

"Õ

u

líL

h-

"Õ

u

>

iZ

LL

llt

H

—T

1-

Ü

of

1-

Z

3 "

ü

ll:

“Õ

'Õ

u

LL_

u

LL

LLT

1-

ll:

h-

1-

of

1 -

LLT

z

U

u

rt

C, TF

O

U

cu

u

U

LJ_

O

U

Ü

U-

uL

h-

"Õ

u

ll:

h-

ll:

C, TF-FC

ll:

ü

u

hp

0

u

,

U

_

u_

u

u_

LL

_

Ll_

uL

|_

1—

D

h-

•—-

H

3

D

u_

h-

Ü

LLT

O

U

LL.

1-

LLT

1-

|—

LLT

t-

Ü

U

u

LL-

ll:

1-

ll:

1—

1-

ll:

3

Z)'

3

3 -

1-

1 -

1-

Ú 1 -

uL

1—

Lil

1-

LLT

1-

ll:

H

LL. O

ll:

1—

af

U

3 -

1- U

Ü

Gl

a.

*

ro

F-)'

I

sD

00

i

CO

ro

cx>

CO

*

CO

r--

c

LO

sO

CO

ç

"03

c

cu

±!

"03

F

cu

9

to

c

E

(.9

fd

E

Ü_

u

CL

(U

fd

to

3

(U

~ãj

E

ü

S

cu

.c

0

t_

CU

X

'3

3

§■

b

s

1

'S

1

c

3

•2

fd

c

3

0

ítT

s

cu

fd

x>

fc

ã

'S

E

cu

0

e

(U

fd

Ci

E

F

3

9

.3

.g

;3

.to

rd

c

§

Yd

3

q

tí

ò

0

u

0

Í3 -g

u -o t;

^-g|

t/i c c

^ <u ^

§ °

O o-

0 Qv

_£Z ^

y O

0)

I

Z

■o i

(T3

.y D

c <2

^ -É

C fO

D ^

J ?

"o §

Z gj

CL) U 'Cí

^ ^ cu

O “

■*-* TD >•

CkO O

^ <9.

■p t:

,o

9

Q.

£

3

e

(U

rd

LO

£ ^

CL C

«/) c

-o "E

S

■5 -c

"o b

xO c

lU

o (U

Õ-K

í 8-

to X

0 ) cu

-o ^

c 9

O >

E o

-S

.,i/> .-tií

CU

u

i; to

m C

O f>s,.

Q o

&°

M

LO

evo

c

gj

'u

cu

CL

to

t

D

DO

C

c

rd

CU

I

'§ M

— oj ^

w O

fd "D CO

CU C ^

^ fd c

S,

'■ « oo

•K

p

.0

Yd

E

t?:

LJJ

XI

LO

i

t_

cu

,ç

3

Cl

O

3

:§

rd

(U

Yd

E

,p

,ç

cu

c

g

Cl

3

E

O

"b

cu

E

(d

"O

u

cQ

(U

p

cu

X3

c

fd

cu

LO

XJ

1

z

p

u

c

rd

"D

.c

c

to

E

C

O

u

X3

P

•«-»

o'

c

C

3

J3

cu

E

'CU

§ 3

ü ^

E

o 'b

^ cu

G ^

‘do.E

^ cu

o

c fd

O -o

U §

UJ o

cu pí

o 9

u s

c

O

i-

o

u

c

D

m a

OJ ^

cz

(U

e ■■

c52 ■

3 q

; fN .

t<

"O

£

(d

'u

^ to

CL ^ _

” t J

cl3 . .

(U

to , o

-C "T ^

«' E

2 c

. P

CU n3 ^

^ UI 2.

^ o ^ <

o ^ OQ

(N ^ Cl.

C —

o N

fd

çu

ín O ■

*1

I

u

c

O

E

t£i E

E o

-u

P rd

— to

3 ^

9

j= ^

■ ^ r

(U

w cu

SjS

Li- ^

<U JS -ti

(U Hl

XI L/

(U "D ^

CQ

m o

.£ ° &

+-i >N.

2-^ I

g ^ iS

b o

>1- cu

o -O ^

^ to to to

<u CN ^ o hP

c ^ X

■s-^pl

2 -£ i3 ^

^ 2 I 2 c

ílSií

^ c ' ti=

2 £ £

CU >:

I

r3

•D

"05

3 O

b U

3 O

^ 1

^ lS

í cu

C to

•- c

"D CU

CU fd

t^ hs

JZ 3

.-«V. (U

.to to

S z

E cu

SI

cl c

to

,-rj 'O

^ o

=3 CL

O CU

U -O

CU

5U

c *

3

C

.O

(U

o >-.

U X)

C; t-

■O^cO

fd _ c

B .Q

E D

to (U

c: -o

cu c

ti <u

c °

rd fd

ÇU

c m

O g

■ffl í

P. Y

11 £

I . to

j X) (U

: ^ SZ

lq.:^

» E •-

’ 5 ■£

> to

to

E

hP ,

lá-

O (u .

^ -o o

^ ^ 9

C CL fO X)

•C to E C

3 10)^

Qí -^ •

CU

CL-Ç

DO

c

íl b 'g

£ P

01

JZ

r20á

o

á" E

§ "c

^ rd

■5

^-P

n) (U

"2 "O

c ^

u

— -D

fd CU P

c x: fO

fS ^

O ?d c

g_3

cu

<u

1

fc o

fd

^ U

to -p

$ gj E

oo CJ cu

<U CU “O

.-tz! CL C

LO CX) CU

s

1d

P .

(U

rtJ ■&!

(U

_ 5

DO to

ÍG « «

n L_ fd

2--0 ti

J- U 01

y -= (u

2

^ ro fd

O O “D

to c

fli

b *3 ' ';5 “2

c ^ (J rd fd

P - m P

POl: Í9 g

>

•C

I

>

-

E

u /“» n fd

S.

P

1d

"D

CU

c

■l

o

8

E

(U

Q.

cj

íi'C

(U CU

td ^

^-g

<u f/)

Cl ^

•2 3,

-5 X) £

n) C ..

(U fd ^

^ c 2

■q. ^

§-8

•tf 9 2

■p ^

b ."i

cu >

P X)

c

I

h-

X3

O P

Q cb

^— is:<D - Srt —*■

46

SciELO

20

Boi. Mus, Para. EmOio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat., Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 11-65, jan.- abr, 2011

Paru

F TF-I, Col

0

U

LLT

C, TF-I, Col

0

U

i_Lr

1-

of

R, Fliv

of

>

i£

Ü

>

'(Z

LLT

U, TF-1

of

R, TF-1

o

u

LU

1-

3*

U,TF

Maicuru

LL_

1-

LLT

af

h7

O

U

uL

H

ll:

"õ

u

LU

1-

3

R, Fliv

R, 1-Riv

R, TF-l-Rv

R, TF

R, TF-1

Grão-Rará

North

Ll_

H

Ll_*

"o

U

ll:

1-

"o

U

LLT

I-

LLT

R, TF-O

Grão-Pará

Centre

C, TF-FC, Col

R, TF

C, TF-FC, Col

U, TF-FC, Col

U_

1-

of

"Õ

u

ll:

1-

ctf

R, TF-FC-Ce,

Col

Grão-Pará

South

uL

H

LLT

uL

1-

LLT

U,TF

of

R, TF

H

ll:

1-

cd

R, TF

R, TF-1

Trombetas

LL.

H

u_:

h7

O

U

i_Lr

1-

ll:

U,TF

R, TF

h-

LU

H

3

\-

LU

1-

3'

Faro

"Õ

u

i_Lr

H

u_r

"õ

u

LLT

1-

D

H

LLT

>

LXT

R, Riv

>

cC

ll:

R, Fliv

U, Riv

C, l-Riv

C, TF

>

cZ

LLT

1-

LU

H

3‘

U, TF-Riv

O

U

ll:

h-

cd

U,TF

Penetope marail (Statius Muller, 1776)* EN, H

Aburria cumanensis (|acquin, 1784)* H

Crax alector Linnaeus, 1766* H

Odontophoridae (1)

Odontophorus gujanensis (Gmelin, 1789)

Phalacrocoracidae (1)

Phalacrocorax brasilianus (Gmelin, 1789)

Anhingidae (1)

Anhinga anhinga (Linnaeus, 1766)

Ardeidae (4)

Tigrisoma lineatum (Boddaert, 1783)

Butorides striata (Linnaeus, 1758)

Ardea cocoi Linnaeus, 1766

Pilherodius pileatus (Boddaert, 1783)

Threskiomithidae (1)

Mesembrinibis cayennensis (Gmelin, 1789)

Cathartidae (3)

vO

Qn

O

E

í

S

1

u

e

-g

CoragKps aíratüs (Bechstein, 1793)

Sarcoramphus papa (Linnaeus, 1758)

Pandionidae (1)

Pandion haliaetus (Linnaeus, 1758)* M

Accipitridae (13)

Leptodon cayanensis (Latham, 1790)

00

LO

i/T

D

<D

n3

C

c

_J

s

'S-

rS

Õ

M

Harpagus bidentatus (Latham, 1790)

Ictinia plúmbea (Gmelin, 1788)

47

SciELO

20

Leucoptemis melanops {Làtham, 1790 )

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: (...) II. Avifauna

2

&

ra

z

'C

o o

'2 Z

U

'S u

e)

'2

-C

A ^

,S o

'2 OI

U

13

dl

-Q

E

cC

a::

a:

q;:

cc:

H

u

1 -

a:

u

D

a:

Ql

u

al

U

1 -

o g

p' “

1 °

cH a:

5 3

^ l£

Q

•i 5

■6 ^

3

H

z

Z

LU

«

00

r;;;

l/í

Z3

0)

OJ

;d

1

48

SciELO

2 13 14 15 16 17 lí

19 20

Boi. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat., Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 11-65, jan,- abr. 2011

Paru

R, Riv

C, TF-I

1-

crf

Ll_

I-

ll:

C, TF

F TF-1, Col

U, TF-1

O

U

ll:

1-

ccf

R,TF

ll:

Ü

R, TF-1, Col-T

Maicuru

R, Fliv

R, Riv

R, Fliv

U, I, Gol

FTF-l

liL

1-

LJ_-

U, TF-1, Col

uL

1-

LLT

o

U

u_-

1-

3

U, TF-1

C, TF-1

LL.

1-

LLT

U, TF-1

Grão-Pará

North

Ll_

1-

3

Li_

H

D

"o

U

LLT

1-

(£

Grão-Pará

Centre

R, FC, T

C, TF-FC, Col

l~

U

LL.

Ll:

Ll_

1-

LLT

U,TF

R, TF-FC, Col

C, TF-FC

"õ

U

Lir

1-

3'

R, FC-Ce

R, TF

C, TF-FC, Col

1-

Ü

LLT

U, TF-FC-Ce

U, Ce, T

Grão-Pará

South

cC

Ll_

H

ll:

C, TF

U, TF-1

"o

U

LL_-

1-

u

U, TF-1

C, TF-1

ll:

C, TF-1

U,TF

Trombetas

O

cd

Ll_

1-

LLT

LJ_

1-

ll:

U,TF

O

U

ll:

1-

ll:

LL,

h-

ll:

U,TF

C, TF

LL,

K

ll:

U, TF-O, T

Faro

U, Riv

>

a:

ll:

U, Riv

R, Riv

>

LLT

1-

LLT

F 1-Riv. Col

H

LLT

h-

LLT

H

LLT

1-

LLT

1-

ll:

H

LLT

F TF-Riv

U,TF

1-

>

£

uL

\-

LLS

Trínga solitaria Wilson, 1813* M

Jacanidae (1)

Jacana jacana (Linnaeus, 1766)

Stemidae (1)

Phaetusa simplex (Gmelin, 1789)

Rhynchopidae (1)

Rynchops niger Linnaeus, 1758

Columbidae (11)

Columbina passerína (Linnaeus, 1758)

Columbina minuta (Linnaeus, 1766)

Columbina fa/pacot/(Temminck, 1811)

Claravis pretíosa (Ferrari-Perez, 1886)

Patagioenas speciosa (Gmelin, 1789)

Patagioenas cayennensis (Bonnaterre, 1792)

Patagioenas plúmbea (Viéllot. 1818)

Patagioenas subvinacea (Lawrence, 1868)

Leptotíla verreauxi Bonaparte, 1855

Leptotíla rufaxiUa (Richard & Bernard, 1792)

Geotrygon montana (Linnaeus, 1758)

Psittacidae (21)

Ara araraúna (Linnaeus, 1758)

Ara macao (Linnaeus, 1758)

Ara chioropterus Cray, 1859

Ara severus (Linnaeus, 1758)

Orthopsittaca manilata (Boddaert, 1783)

Aratínga leucophthalma (Statius Muller, 1776)

Aratínga maculata (Statius Muller, 1776)* T, EN

Aratínga aurea (Gmelin, 1788)

— rs<i>2i - ^

49

(Continued)

SciELO

L2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Boi. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat., Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 11-65, jan,- abr. 2011

fContinuedI

2

&

C, TF-I

cd

R, TF-I

LLT

D

R, TF

Lil.

H

LL_-

R, 1, Gol

0

U

Lll.

1 -

u

C

í

Maicuru

R, TF

uL

1 -

Li_‘

cd

R, TF

U,TF

U, Rjv, Gol

U, Riv, Gol

U, TF-I

R, TF-I

"õ

U

Ll_-

1 -

=)

U

c

D

to

c

.0

fd

u

Grão-Pará

North

1 -

LLT

H

cd

U,TF

R, 0 , T

R, TF

U, TF

7 Ó

u

< 4 =

U

(U

O.

i/>

0 )

(/)

0

Grão-Rará

Centre

C, TF

R, Ce, T

R, TF

U

LL_

Lil

H

LLT

R, TF-FC, T

U, FC-Ce. Gol

R, Ce

u

Li_

LL-

H

ULT

R, Ce

LJ_

h-

cd

U, TF-FC-Ce,

Gol

-Q

É

to

C

0 )

>

DO

fd

td

c

<D

to

OJ

t_

Cl

í

10

D

C

<ü

DO

to

Ic

"5

to

QJ

'u

(U

Q.

to

t3

c

‘t?;

io

rd

td

_c

V

1 d

u

TD

a>

e

rd

c

to

D

C

02

DO

rd

*U

0 )

$

d.

to

0 )

t!

_02

02

jC

H

Grão-Pará

South

R, TF

C, TF

R, TF

F TF-FC-I, Gol

1 -

LLT

R, FC

R, TF-I

R, TF-1

Lll.

H

Ü

Trombetas

R, TF

U-

h-

LLS

U_

1 -

LLT

U, TF-O, Gol

U,TF-0,Col-T

U,TF

0

u

LLT

H

D

Faro

cd

F TF-I

z5

FTF-I

>

cx:

LLT

C, R'v

F Riv, Gol

F TF-1-FC-Riv

U, TF-Riv

R, TF

f-

uL

H

LLT

Strix virgata (Cassin, 1849)

O

o

ON

.í 2

■õ)

:>

t

•c

.1

c

•i3

Asio stygius (Wagler, 1832)

Nyctibiidae (3)

Nyctibius grandis {Gmelm, 1789)

00

r:;

ç"

0 )

E

U,

S

(U

• iiO

63

-õ

i

Nyctibíus leucopterus (Wied, 1821)

Caprimulgidae (7)

Lurocalis semitorquatus (Gmelin, 1789)

Nyctíprogne leucopyga (Spix, 1825)

Nyctídromus albicoilis (Gmelin, 1789)

Caprimulgus rufus Boddaert, 1783

Caprimulgus nigrescens Cabanis, 1848

Hydropsalis dimacocerca (Tschudi, 1844)

Hydropsalis torquata (Gmelin, 1789)

Apodidae ( 6 )

Streptoprocne zonaris (Shaw, 1796)

Chaetura spinicaudus (Temminck, 1839)

Chaetura dnere/ventris Sclater, 1862

Chaetura sp.''

Tachornis squamata (Cassin, 1853)

Panyptila cayennensis (Gmelin, 1789)

Trochilidae (13)

Threnetes nigerloehkeni Grantsau, 1969* EN

Phaethornis ruber (Linnaeus, 1758)

■* — £5 - <}>S:i —*■

51

SciELO

(Continued)

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: II. Avifauna

Paru

o

U

Lit

I-

u

R. TF-I, Gol

cd

O

U

lL

h-

LLT

1 -

ll:

1 -

cd

1 -

cd

R, TF

uL

h-

iis

C, TF-1

U, TF

U,TF

U, l-Riv

U, Ftiv, Col

R, I, Col

cd

C, TF-1

Maicum

0

U

LLT

1 -

cd

"Õ

u

U--

1 -

ü

R, TF-1

~õ

U

[Z

1 -

LL_-

"o

U

lÚ

1 -

LLT

\-

Lir

1 -

D

lL

\-

LLT

LL.

ll:

U, TF-1

o

U

u_-

H

D

U, Riv

R, Ftiv

D

R, Riv

cd

FTF-1

Grão-Pará

North

"o

U

LLT

1 -

LLT

Ll_

1 -

z>

0

U

LLT

H

cd

R. TF

"õ

U

LL_-

1 -

D

R, TF

"Õ

U

LL_-

H

Ü

C, TF

li_

1 -

llt

o

U

LLT

1 -

D

1 -

LU-

h-

'o

U

Ll_*

1 -

cd

o

U

u_-

1 -

D

Grão-Pará

Centre

"o

U

LLT

1 -

LLT

R, TF

U, TF-FC, Col

R, FC-Ce, Col

R, Ce

U, TF-FC

C, TF-FC, Col

C, TF-FC

R, TF-FC, T

C, TF-FC

Grão-Pará

South

U,TF

cd

1 U, TF-1

cd

O

U

LLT

f-

LLT

o

U

LL--

F-

Ü

O

U

LLT

H

LLT

U,TF

■q

U

LLT

1 -

u_-

cd

3

O

U

LLT

1 -

LLT

Trombetas

hy

O

U

LL_-

1 -

u

U,TF

O

U

LLT

h-

LLT

R,TF

U,TF

Ll_

H

Ü

H

LLT

1 -

ll:

o

U

LL_-

H

z5

1 -

LI_-

f-

Z)

"õ

U

LL_-

1 -

ü

Faro

"Õ

u

LLT

h-

cd

1 -^

0

u

uL

1 -

u_*

U, 1, Gol

U, TF-1

F TF-1, Col

U, TF-1

f-

ul

1 -

LLT

h*

ul

1 -

LLT

U,TF

zS

R, TF

>

(Z

LLT

U, Riv

U, 1, Col

U, Riv

R, I-Riv

F TF-l-FC

Phaethomis bourcierí {Lesson, 1832)

Phaethomis superdliosus (Linnaeus, 1766)

Campylopterus largipennis (Boddaert. 1783)

Florísuga mellivora (Linnaeus, 1758)

Anthracothorax sp.

Topaza pella (Linnaeus, 1758)

Thalurania furcata (Gmelin, 1788)

Hylocharis sapphirina (Gmelin, 1788)

Amazilia fimbriata (Gmelin, 1788)

Amazilia viridigaster cupreicauda Salvin &

Godman, 1884* EN

Heliothryx auritus {GmeWn, 1788)

Trogonidae (6)

Trogon melanurus Swainson, 1838

Trogon viridis Linnaeus, 1766

Trogon violaceus Gmelin, 1788

Trogon rufus Gmelin, 1788

Trogon collaris Vieillot, 1817

Pharomachrus pa\roninus (Sp\x, 1824)

Alcedinidae (5)

Megaceryle torquata (Linnaeus, 1766)

CWoroce/y/e amazona (Latham, 1790)

Chioroceryle aenea (Pâllas, 1764)

Chioroceryle americana (Gmelin, 1788)

Chioroceryle inda (Linnaeus, 1766)

Momotidae (1)

vO

sO

1 ^

i/í

D

QJ

IT3

C

s

o

i

s

%

o

1

5

Galbulidae (6)

rsosí — 1 -

52

SciELO

Boi. Mus, Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat,, Belém. v. 6, n. 1, p. 11-65, jan,- abr. 2011

Paru

U,TF

O

U

LLT

R, TF-I

C, TF-I

o

U

ur

l-

D

U, TF-I

U, TF-1

U, TF-I

R, TF

C, TF-I

U, l-Riv, Col

R,TF

C, TF-I

C, TF-1

U, TF-I, Col

(£

o

U

LL.

1-

ü

ul

h-

ll:

of

O

U

ll:

1-

Maicuru

U, l-Riv, Col-T

U, TF-I, Gol

D

Lil

H

LLT

U,TF

U, TF-1

R, TF

|_

LLT

1-

ccf

ul

1-

LLT

R, Riv

U, TF-I

ul

LLT

O

U

ul

1-

ll:

U, TF-1

U, TF-I

ul

1-

LLT

U, TF-I, Col-T

R, TF

U, TF-I, Col

Grão-Pará

North

0

U

LLT

H

LLT

C, TF

U,TF

R, TF

*o

U

ll:

1-

ai

R, TF

O

U

LLT

I-

LLT

C, TF

u_

1-

LU*

H

LLT

1-

R, TF

ÍZ-

1-

cd

R, TF

Grão-Pará

Centre

R, TF

R, FC-Ce

"5

U

Ü

u_

ü

u

Ll_

Lil

LLT

U, TF-FC

R, TF

0

u

ü

Ll_

ul

H

LLT

R, TF-FC

U, TF-FC

U, FC-Ce

U,TF

C, TF-FC, Col

U, TF

U, TF-FC

R, TF

Grão-Pará

South

C, TF Col

F FC, Col-T

U,TF

"Õ

U

LLT

H

Ü

U,TF

U, TF-I

U, 1, Col

R, TF

0

U

LL_-

1-

3 '

o

U

u_-

1-

ü

U_

I-

LLT

C, TF-1, Col

C, TF-FC-1, Col

R, TF

U,TF

R, TF-l

R, TF-1

O

U

LLT

H

cC

Trombetas

R, TF

U,TF

LI-

H

LLT

"Õ

u

Lir

H

3

U, TF

1-

Lir

h-

3 '

o

U

LLT

1-

3 '

U, TF Col-T

Li_

LLT

U,TF

C, TF

o

U

LL_-

1-

ü

H

LLT

1-

3 ‘

1-

LLT

H

LLT

I-

LL_-

H

3 '

R, TF

1

Faro

hr

0

U

ll:

h-

LLT

u

u_

Lil

H

LLT

LI_

t-

LLT

"5

U

LL_-

H

3

l-T

O

u

LLT

H

ll:

U, TF-I, Col-T

U, TF-I

1-

U_“

1-

3 '

C, TF-I, Col-T

>

cZ

LLT

H

ll:

I-

LLT

C, TF-1, Col-T

1-

ul

h-

LLT

H

LLT

I-

UT

1-

LLT

H

3 '

F TF-1-Riv, T

H

LLT

H

LLT

U, TF-1

"õ

U

LL.'

1-

3 ‘

Brachygaiba lugubris (Swainson, 1838)

Galbula albirostris Latham, 1790

Galbula galbula (Linnaeus, 1766)

Galbula leucogastra Vieillot, 1817

Galbula dea (Linnaeus, 1758)

Jacamerops aureus (Statius Muller, 1776)

Bucconidae (8)

Notharchus macrorhynchos (Gmelin, 1788)* EN

Notharchus tectus (Boddaert, 1783)

Bucco tamatía Gmelin, 1788

Bucco capensis Linnaeus, 1766

Malacoptíla fusca (Gmelin, 1788)

Nonnula rubecula (Spix, 1824)

Monasa atra (Boddaert, 1783)* EN

Chelidoptera tenebrosa (Palias, 1782)

Capitonidae (1)

Capito niger (Statius Muller, 1776)* EN

Ramphastidae (5)

Ramphastos tucanus Linnaeus, 1758

Ramphastos viteilinus Lichtenstein, 1823

Selenidera piperívora (Linnaeus, 1766)* EN

Pteroglossus viridis (Linnaeus, 1766)* EN

Pteroglossus aracari (Linnaeus, 1758)

Picidae (15)

Picumnus exilis (Lichtenstein, 1823)

Picumnus cirratus Temminck, 1825

Melanerpes cruentatus (Boddaert, 1783)

Veniliomis cassini (Malherbe, 1862)* EN

53

.SciELO

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: (...) II. Avifauna

X

a

ç

c

0

y

E

íC

U. TF-1

U, TF-1

0

U

ut

h-

u

cd

cC

U.TF

LL.

U_

C, TF-1

D

C. TF-I. Col

F I, Col

F I, Col-T

U. I. Col-T

C. TF-1. Col

a:

C, I. Col-T

FTF-I

C, TF-1. Col

R, TF

C. TF-I

LU

R, TF-1

Maicuni

U, TF-I

cd

R, TF

H

ul

1-

ll:

R, TF

R, TF-I

R, TF

R, TF-1

FTF-I

R, TF-I

U, TF-I

R, TF Col

R, 1-Riv

Lll.

1-

cd

R, TF-I, Col-T

R, 1, Col

O

U

uL

\-

u_-

F TF-I, Col

O

U

D

U, TF-1, T

3

U, TF-I, Col

Grão-Rará

North

R, TF

U,TF

O

U

LLT

\-

cd

Ll_

1-

ur

O

U

U,-

H

cd

Ü_

H

ixr

U,TF

H

LLT

H

cd

"õ

U

Ü

"õ

U

LLT

1-

ü

o

U

LLT

H

Ü

"õ

U

LL.'

H

zS

R, TF

R, TF Col

Grão-Pará

Centre

U.TF

R, TF

Ü_

f-

LLT

R, TF

R, TF-FC

Ll_

LLT

C, TF

U,TF

U, FC-Ce, T

u_

1-

LLT

F FC-Ce, Col

U,TF

R, TF

U, TF-FC

R, TF-FC, Col

Grão-F^rá

South

O

U

Li_-

H

ll:

U_

1-

LLT

R, TF

R, TF-I, Gol

R, TF-I

"o

U

LLT

1-

3

Ll_

1-

llt

C, TF

0

U

LL_-

1-

u

"Õ

U

cd

R, FC-I, T

C, TF

0

U

u_

LLT

R, l,T

o

U

Ü

o

U

LLT

1-

ü

o

U

jf

Ü

Li,

h-

LLT

F TF-I, Col

3

o

U

LL.-

1 -

ü

Trombetas

U,TF

U, TF

o

U

LL.-

1-

D

o

U

LL_-

1 -

D

1-

LL_-

H

D

U,TF

ftf

U,TF

D

o

U

LL.'

1-

D

U, TF-O, T

U, TF Col-T

F TF Col

'Õ

U

LLT

1-

LLT

"õ

U

LLT

1-

D

U, TF

cd

"Õ

u

D

Faro

F TF-I, T

U, TF

FTF-I

uL

(-

LLT

cd

U, I,T

U, TF-I, T

F TF-I-Riv, Col

F TF-I, Col-T

U, 1-Riv

F TF-I, T

"õ

U

LL_“

1-

zS

U, I-Riv, T

U, I-Riv, Col-T

F TF-I, Col-T

U, FC, Col-T

F I, Col

F TF-I, Col-T

C, TF-I, Col-T

F TF-I, Col-T

f-

LL.

h“

LLT

U, I-Riv

FTF-I

Piculus flavigula (Boddaert, 1783)

Piculus chrysochhros (Vieillot, 1818)

Coiaptes rubiginosus (Swainson, 1820)* P

Celeus undatus (Linnaeus. 1766)

Celeus elegans (Statius Muller, 1776)

Celeus flavescens {Gmehn. 1788)

Celeus pavus (Statius Muller, 1776)

Celeus torquatus (Boddaert, 1783)

Dryocopus lineatus {Unnaeus, 1766)

nn

00

tf

V

fTj

■D

■8

CÜ

1

Campephilus melanoleucos (Gmelin, 1788)

Thamnophilídae (43)

Cymbilaimus lineatus (leach, 1814)

Frederickena viridis (Vieillot, 1816)* EN

Taraba major Çd\é\\\oX. 1816)

Sakesphorus luctuosus (Lichtenstein, 1823)

Thamnophilus doliatus (Linnaeus. 1764)

Thamnophilus murinus Sclater & SaVin, 1868

Thamnophilus punctatus (Shaw, 1809)

Thamnophilus melanothorax Sclater, 1857* EN

Thamnophilus amazonicus Sclater, 1858

Thamnomanes ardesiacus (Sclater & Salvin, 1867)

Thamnomanes caesius (Jemmnóí, 1820)

Epinecrophylla gutturalis

(Sclater & Salvin, 1881)* EN

Myrmotherula brachyura (Hermann, 1783)

Myrmothemia surinamensis (Gmelin, 1788)* EN

Myrmotherula guttata (Vieillot, 1825)* EN

^- IgOSC -^

54

Boi. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat., Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 11-65, jan,- abr. 2011

Fr

U, I, Col-T

Paru

C, TF-1, Co

U, TF-I

C, TF-I, T

RTF

LL"

U,TF

C, TF

o

U

Lil.

H

Ü

U, 1, Col

C, TF-1, Co

U, I, Col

R, 1, Col-T

C, TF-1, Co

i-

ll:

H

od

ü

U

Lil.

1 -

u

O

U

ll:

1 -

of

R TF-1, Col

2

3

O

U

O

U

O

U

H

uL

Li-

"o

U

1 -

LLT

h-

LL

1 -

_

O

U

O

U

O

U

H

"Õ

Fr

o

U

'o

O

U

uI.

uL

H

D

cd

h-

LL

Ql

LL*

z

D

f-

LLT

1 -

U_'

Ü

D

1 -

LL"

D

1 -

ll:

cd

1 —

Z)

f-

cd

1 -

LL“

h-

ll:

rão-Pará .

North

h"

Fr

o

U

L±_-

h-

o

U

H

LL.

t-

LLT

R, TF

1 -

LL_-

1 -

u

1 -

LLT

1 -

üf

R, TF

ü

u

LL"

1 -

O

U

ll:

f-

O

U

ll:

1 -

U,TF

Ò

U

LL"

H

"Õ

U

ll:

1 -

Ü

U

ü

D

ll:

hr

Grão-Pará

Centre

u

U-

llL

h-

ll:

R, TF

R TF-FC

C, FC-Ce, Col-

R, TF

R. TF-FC

LL

1 -

LL"

C, TF-FC, T

R, TR Col

C, FC, Col

U,TF

U, TF

"o

U

LL"

1 -

cd

"Õ

U

ll:

H

of

rão-Pará

South

'Õ

U

U-

líL

O

U

LLT

l-

h-

LLT

H

LLT

0

U

ll:

1 -

O

U

Ü

LL.

LL

O

U

Ü

LL

U,TF

hp

o

U

u_-

h-

Ü

cd

"Õ

U

LL"

1 -

cd

O

U

ll:

1 -

O

U

ll:

H

U, FC

0

U

LL"

1-

h-

ccf

'Õ

u

LL"

1-

"Õ

U

LU-

1-

a

1-

ü

LLT

ü

Ü

cC

Ü

U

u

al

u

D

LL"

Trombetas

“Õ

u

H

LLT

U, TR Col

H

ll:

1-

Z)

h"

0

Li.-

t-

u

h7

0

u

LLT

h-

u

1-

LL_-

1-

Z)

1-

LLT

1-

D

U, TF-I, Col-T

cd

R, I, Col-T

'o

U

LL*

H

LL"

od

\-r

o

U

ll:

1-

ll:

U.TF

"5

U

LL"

1-

LL"

R, TF

"Õ

u

ll:

1-

LL"

"õ

U

Ll_-

t-

D

1-

hp

Fr

j_

e

'Õ

u

"Õ

u

h-

uL

H

ll:

h-

ü

± h-

liL o

H

\-

U

h-

LL

O

U

1-

O

U

Fr

o

u

y-

Fr

o

U

LL

1 -

hy

o

U

LL

H

“Õ

u

"o

U

uL

H

ll:

uL

\-

LLT

(-

ll:

1 - u

ü

LL"

cd

z>

LL

H

LL"

LL.

H

U

ü

D

LL"

D

LLT

1-

LL"

Z)

LL

LL"

LL

H

LL"

Q.

00

m

CO

z

LU

Z

LU

*

fS

*

00

sO

00

s

00

LO

oo

qJ

_ç

z

LU

LO

00

z

Z

LU

*

cõ'

Co'

Myrmedza atrothorax (Boddaert, 1783)

*

Mynvotherula axillahs (Vieillot, 1817)

Myrmotherula longipennis Pelzeln, 186

6)

O

s

QJ

E

•s

o

Herpsilochmus sticturvsSaivin, 1885*

?

1

*3

i/í

S

1

C

(U

êi

s

-S

8

t)

.s

e

■§

S

E

1

I

Microrhopias quixensis microstictus

(Berlepsch, 1908)

Formidvora grísea (Boddaert, 1783)

Terenura spodiopüla Sclater & Salvin, 1

Cercomacra dnerascens (Sclater, 1857

Cercomacra tyrannina (Sclater, 1855)

Z

oS

'c

na

x>

na

u

s

8

u

c

s

fTJ

i

Myrmoborus kucophrys angustirosüis

(Cabanis, 1848)

íO

oo

tf

OJ

na

XJ

■§

CO

¥

•2

§

.Ll

ê

5

O

1

lS

<D

U

LO

1

t

'q3

e

õ

§

5

O

Sdateria naevia (Gmelin, 1788)

Psrcnostola rufifrons (Gmelin, 1789)* E

Percnostola subcristata FHellmayr, 1908

Schistodchia kucostigma (Pelzeln, 186^

Myrmedza longipes (Swainson, 1825)

Myrmedza ferruginea (Statius Muller, 1

Myrmornis torquata (Boddaert, 1783)

Pithys albifrons (Linnaeus, 1766)

rõ'

CO

tf

cu

na

"O

"D

O

CÜ

1

t

c:

1

55

.SciELO

20

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: (...) II. Avifauna

1

1 ^

U, TF-l, Col

R, TF

C, TF-l

O

U

Lj_r

1-

LLT

U, TF-I

U, TF-l, Col

0

U

uL

H

ll:

0

U

LLT

1-

cd

U, TF-l, Col

o

U

LL.

1-

u

cd

Lll.

1-

LLT

F TF-l, Col

Maicuru

U, TF-1, Col

U, TF-l, Col

U,TF

U, TF Col-T

1-

LLT

H

3

"Õ

u

LL,

h*

LLT

U, TF-l

U, TF-l, Col

U, TF-I, Col

O

U

U--

1-

cd

"o

U

LL.

H

ll:

o

U

LU-

h-

3'

f-

LLT

t-

of

R, TF

F TF-I, Col

U, TF-l, Col

F TF-l, Col

Grão-Pará

North

hr

o

U

LLT

H

LLT

R. TF

O

U

ixr

h-

Ü

o

U

LLT

H

Ü

C, TF

U,TF

R, TF

0

U

LLT

H

cd

“Õ

U

LLT

1-

ll:

"Õ

u

LLT

cd

f-

LLT

1-

cd

o

U

LLT

K

U

R, TF

O

U

LLT

h-

cd

hy

0

U

LLT

I-

LLT

Grão-Pará

Centre

R, TF-FC, Col

hv

0

u

ur

1-

cd

C, TF

C, TF-FC

R, TF

U, TF Col-T

U,TF

o

U

LLT

h-

3'

C, TF-FC, Col

hj

o

U

LLT

K

3'

'Õ

U

LLT

I-

LLT

Grão-Pará

South

C, TF-FC, Col

R, FC, T

"o

u

LLT

1-

cd

o

U

Lll.

1-

u

O

U

LLT

f-

LLT

U, TF-l

R, TF-l, Col

0

U

Ll_-

1-

3'

o

U

LLT

H

3‘

C, TF

U, TF-FC, Col-T

"õ

U

LL_-

1-

3'

O

U

LLT

H

cd

U, TF Col

C, TF-l, Col

cd

R, TF-l, Col

"Õ

u

LLT

1-

llt

Trombetas

O

U

Lir

H

LLT

U,TF

H

LL_-

1-

3

hy

O

U

LLT

H

LLT

"Õ

U

LLT

l-

LLT

'o

U

Lxr

h-

ll:

o

U

u_-

1-

3'

U, TF Col

o

U

LLT

H

3'

t-r

o

U

Ll_-

1-

3‘

F TF Col-T

C, TF

t-

1-

Ll_-

U,TF

R, TF

"o

U

ll:

1-

ll:

Faro

F TF-l, Col-T

H

Ll_-

H

D

U,TF

U, TF Col-T

F TF Col-T

f-;-

O

U

Lll.

H

LLT

U, TF-l, T

•t

o

u

LLT

h-

LLT

F TF-l, Col-T

h7

o

U

LLT

h-

3'

F TF-l, Col-T

It

o

U

u_-

1-

3'

hy

O

U

LLT

1-

LLT

"õ

u

LL.-

1-

3'

hy

O

U

LLT

1-

LLT

C, TF-I, Col-T

F I-Riv

1-

LL.-

1-

3'

U,TF

F TF-l, Col-T

Hylophylax naevius {Gmelin, 1789)

Hylophylax punaulatus {Des Murs, 1856)

Willisomis poediinotus (Cabanis, 1847)

Conopophagidae (1)

Conopophaga auríta (Gmelin, 1789)

Grallariidae (3)

GraJlaria varia (Boddaert, 1783)

PO

fN

CO

jiZ

u

c

E

è

■§

s

e

SJ

í-

Myrmothera campanisona (Hermann, 1783)

Formicariidae (2)

Formicarius colma Boddaert, 1783

Formicarius anaJis (d'Orbigny & Lafresnaye, 1837)

Scleruridae (3)

Sckrurus mexicanus Sclater, 1857

Sckrurus rufigularis Pelzeln, 1868

Sckrurus caudacutus (Vieillot, 1816)

Dendrocolaptidae (18)

Dendrodncla fuliginosa (Vieillot, 1818)

Dendrodncla merula (Lichtenstein, 1829)

Deconychura longicauda (Pelzeln, 1868)

Deconychura stictolaema (Pelzeln, 1868)

Sittasomus griselcapilius (Vieillot, 1818)

Glyphorynchus spirurus (Vieillot, 1819)

Nasica longirostris (Vieillot, 1818)

Dendrexetastes rufigula (Lesson, 1844)

z

UI

*

CO

(D

03

C

(/)

5

1

a

S9

1

Xiphocolaptes promeropirhynchus (Lesson, 1840)

Dendrocolaptes certhia (Boddaert, 1783)

^ — rg(&zi

56

SciELO

Boi. Mus. Para. Emnio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat, Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p, 11-65, jan.- abr, 2011

E

O

U

LLT

H

of

0

u

LLT

o

U

L±r

1-

ü

LLT

o

U

Lil-

1-

u

ul.

H

LLT

R, 1, Col

3'

R, TF-1

O

U

LLT

h-

ll:

R, TF

O

U

LL.

1-

ll:

O

U

LLT

H

cd

lL

\-

ILT

U, TF-1, Col

R, TF-1, Col

R, 1, Col

R, TF

Lll.

H

ü

H

Lit

H

3'

Maicuru

u_

1-

Z)

>

h:

D

o

u

Lll.

H

Ü_"

"o

U

cC

h-

3

U, TF-l, Gol

U. TF-I, Col-T

U, 1, Col-T

R, 1, Col-T

Fp

O

U

3‘

R, TF-I, Col

o

U

U_'

h-

3'

O

U

LLT

h-

cd

U, 1, Col-T

U, TF-1, Col

O

U

LLT

1-

cd

R, TF-1, Col

H

cd

U, TF-1, Col

Grão-Pari

North

F TF Col-T

C, TF Col-T

Ll_

h-

cd

LL.

t-

cd

Ll_

H

cd

o

U

L±r

1-

3‘

'o

U

LLT

H

Ll_-

LL.

1-

cd

Ll_

h-

cd

O

U

LLT

1-

LLT

LL.

1-

cd

O

u

ll:

1-

cd

"o

U

Lir

h-

(d

O

U

LLT

1-

cd

H

LL_-

H

3‘

Grão-Pará

Centre

O

U

LLT

H

cd

O

U

LLT

H-

LLT

Ll_

I-

3'

1-

<u

U

cd

"Õ

U

LLT

1-

cd

Ll_

H

LLT

Ll_

1-

3"

i-

LLT

cd

U, TF-FC

Ll_

H

3‘

“Õ

U

Ll.'

1-

cd

Ll_

H

cd

"õ

U

LLT

1-

LLT

LL.

1-

3‘

Grão-Pará

South

U, TF-FC, Gol

"o

U

LLT

H

Ü

cd

C, TF-I, Gol

Li_

H

3'

F TF-FC, Col-T

"o

U

LLT

1-

cd

LL.

\-

LLT

Lil_

1-

u

"õ

U

LLT

H

cd

H

LLT

1-

cd

Ll-

H

LLT

"Õ

u

cd

■q

U

lL

\-

LLT

\-

cd

"o

U

ul

1-

LLT

■5

U

LLT

1-

ü

Trombetas

U_

1-

ll:

□f

h-

o

U

ur

p-

ü

cd

O

U

LLT

H

LíS

h7

O

U

ll:

I-

U-T

U, TF Col-T

y-

LLT

1-

3‘

u_

H

3'

"õ

U

ur

1-

3‘

"5

U

LLT

1-

LLT

"õ

U

LL.-

H

3‘

\-

LL_-

1-

3”

'o

U

LLT

1-

LLT

’Õ

U

LLT

1-

ll:

Li-

H

3'

\-

LLT

H

cd

h7

O

U

LLT

1-

LLT

h-

0

u

LLT

H

•LLT

Faro

"3

U

3

"o

u

>'

'cÇ

LLT

F TF-1, Col-T

hv

O

U

LLT

F TF-F Col-T

H

LLT

H

U-T

U, TF-1, Col-T

h-

3‘

1-;-

0

U

LLT

1-

LLT

•t

o

u

U_“

1-

LLT

F TF-1, Col-T

U, TF Col

O

U

LLT

1-

3'

F TF-1, Col-T

F TF-1, Col

1-

3'

U, TF-1, Col-T

Dendrocolaptespicumnus Lichtenstein, 1820

Dendroplex picus (Gmelin, 1788)

Xiphorhynchus pardalotus (yiéWot, 1818)* EN

Xiphorhynchus obsoktus (Lichtenstein, 1820)

Xiphorhynchusguttatus (Lichtenstein, 1820)

Lepidocolaptes albolineatus (Lafresnaye, 1845)

Campylorhamphus procurvoides (Lafresnaye, 1850)

Furnariidae (13)

Synallaxis albescens Jemrrúnck, 1823

ro

(N

CO

u

c

E

s

5

.io

J

Synallaxis macconnelli obscuriorJodd, 1948* EN

Synallaxisgujanensis {Gme\\r\, 1789)

Cranioleuca gutturata

(d'Orbigny& Lafresnaye, 1838) j

Philydor erythrocercum (Pelzeln, 1859)

Philydor pyrrhodes {Cãhanls, 1848)

Automolus ochrolaemus (Tschudi, 1844)

Automolus infuscatus (Sclater, 1856)

Automolus rubiginosus (Sclater, 1857)

Automolus rufipileatus (Pehe\n, 1859)

?

Ov

C

n3

E

Q.

03

j::

U

1

e

1

Xenops minutus (Sparrman, 1788)

lyrannidae (69)

Mionectes oleagineus (Lichtenstein, 1823)

Mionectes macconnelli (Chubb, 1919)

Leptopogpn amaurocephalus Tschudi, 1846

Corythopis torquatus (Tschudi, 1844)

Lophotriccus vitiosus (Bangs & Penard, 1921)

^ — tsosc —^

57

(Continued)

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: (,,,) II, Avifauna

Paru

U,TF

R, TF

C, TF-1

LX.

H

LLT

1-

u_>

í-

cd

C, TF-1

C, TF-1, T

R,TF

LLT

LL.

h-

U_“

LL.

H

LLT

R, 1, Col-T

C, TF-I

1-

LLT

H

cd

Maicuru

U, TF-I, Col-T

U,TF

U, TF-1, T

h-

LLT

H

of

\-

ll:

H

cd

R,TF

U, TF-1

R, TF-1

cd

R, TF-1

R, TF

U, TF-1

R, Ftiv

R, TF

Grão-Pará

North

H

LLT

1-

cd

LLT

H

cd

h;-

O

U

u.-

t-

u

R, TF

"o

U

H

LLT

\-

LLT

f-

cd

U,TF

Ll_

H

LLT

R,TF

Ll_

1-

LJ_*

R, TF

C, TF

Li-

1-

LLT

R, TF

Grão-Pará

Centre

C, TF Col-T

U,TF

U, FC, Col-T

C, TF-FC

R, Ce

R, FC-Ce,

Col-T

U,TF

C, TF-FC

U, Ce, Col

F Ce, Col-T

U, FC-Ce, Col

U,TF

FTF-FC-Ce,

Col

R, TF

Grão-Pará

South

R, I,T

U, TF-I, T

R, FC, Col-T

C, TF-I

C, TF

H

LLT

1-

D

C, TF-1

C, TF-FC-1, T

R,TF

R, TF-I

R,FC, Col-T

U-

H

LLT

U, TF-1

h-

u_-

1-

z5

H

LLT

K

cd

Trombetas

H

LLT

1-

LLT

Ll_

í-

U_'

1-

LLT

K

U-T

U, TF Col-T

U,TF

U_

1-

LLT

U,TF

U, TF-I

U,TF

y~

LLT

1-

LLT

h-

LLT

H

cd

o

U

Ltr

1-

D

Faro

of

R, FC, T

U, TF-I

U, Riv

>

£

uL

H

LLT

C, TF-1-Riv, Col

U,TF

F 1, Col-T

U, l-Riv, T

1 -

LL.

1-

ll:

>

cZ

ULT

U, TF-1, Col-T

Lcphotriccus galeatus {Qoddaen, 1783)

Hemitriccusjosephinae (Chubb, 1914)* EN

Hemitriccus zosterops (Pelzeln, 1868)

Hemitriccus inomatus (Pelzeln, 1868)* P

Myiomis ecaudatus (d'Orbigny & Lafresnaye,

1837)

PO

LO

CO

JD

D

n3

03

i

1

s

0

Todlrostrum maculatum (Desmarest, 1806)

Todlrostrum dnereum (Linnaeus, 1766)

Todlrostrum pictum SaVin, 1897* EN

Phyllomyias griseiceps (Sclater & Salvin, 1871)* P

Tyrannulus elatus (Latham, 1790)

O

PO

00

c

DO

■e

o

1

I

%

t

LO

pn

CO

c

o

l/)

c

i

t

§

S)

t

Myiopagis flavivertex (Sclater, 1887)

PVl

PNj

00

c

D

s

u3

Elaenia cristata Pelzeln, 1868

Baenia chiriquensis Lawrence, 1865

Baenia ruficeps Pelzeln, 1868* P

Omithion inerme Hartlaub, 1853

Camptostoma obsoktum (Temminck, 1824)

Capsiempis flaveola (Lichtenstein, 1823)

Zimmeriusgradiipes (Sclater & Salvin, 1868)

Phylloscartes virescens Todd, 1925* EN

Inezia subflava (Sclater & Salvin, 1873)

Rhynchocyclus olivaceus (Temminck, 1820)

^— ISOXt

58

SciELO

Boi. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat, Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 11-65, jan.- abr. 2011

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: (...) II. Avifauna

X

ç

c

0

y

Paru

5

LL.

1-

u

Lll

h-

U_"

ul

H

u_

0

U

D

U, TF-1. Gol

R, 1, Gol

U. TF-1

c

u

Lll.

h-

aí

C, TF-1, Gol

1-

uL

f-

LLT

cd

C, TF-I

R, TF

R. TF-1

C. TF-I

R, TF

F TF Gol

U, TF Gol

Maicuru

U, Riv

U, TF-I

1-

U_'

h-

cd

R, TF-I

R, I-Riv

U, TF-I

D

U, TF-I

R, TF

C, TF-1, Gol

U, TF-1

Llt

H

D

R, TF

F TF-I, Gol

LL

1-

LLT

U, TF-I

U,TF

Grão-Pará

North

C, TF

R, TF

O

U

LLT

H

of

R, TF

1-

LLT

t-

D

o

U

LLT

1-

D

R, TF

”0

U

u_r

1-

ü

o

U

ll:

P-

D

LL.-

0- Ll_

- 1-

yi cC

C, TF

LL

K

LLT

o

U

LLT

1-

ü

0

U

LL_-

1-

3'

Grão-Pará

Centre

C, FC-Ce

O

U

LLT

1-

of

R, FC-Ce, Gol

U, TF

F TF-FC

R, TF

C, TF

u

LL

1-

LL*

C, TF

F FC, Col-T

C, TF-FC, Col-T

R, TF

“o

U

LLT

H

cd

R, FC, T

Grão-Pará

South

cC

C, TF

U_

I-

U_'

C, TF-FC-1

cC

C, TF Gol

R, TF

o

U

ut

1-

ü

C, TF

"5

U

Ó

LL

1-

LL"

C, TF Gol

LL

1-

LL"

U, FC, Col-T

C, TF-FC-I

F TF-FC

U, TF-FC

Trombetas

u, o

LL

h-

u_-

U.TF

Ü_

H

LLT

"õ

U

Ll_-

1-

Z)

C, TF

LL

H

LLT

|-

U_' _

- 'd

s u

LLT

í L-

1-

LLT

1-

u

1-

LL_-

1-

3

H

Ll_-

h-

3*

Faro

>

ce:

LLT

>

£

uj-

(-

uL

1-

LLT

H

LLT

1-

ll:

iL

\-

LLS

U, Riv

U, TF

F 1, Col-T

t-

Lir

H

D

1-

LLT

1-

LLT

1-

U

LL

H-

LLT

U,TF

I-

LLT

1-

3

R, FC, Col-T

y

o

U

LLT

LL-

h-

LLT

H

LLT

Tyrannus méancho\ícus'4\é\'\o\. 1819

Tyrannus savanaV\é\\lot, 1808

Rhytiptema simptex (Lichtenstein, 1823)

Sirystes sibilator (yieiWot, 1818)

R

m

oo

f

o8

1

O

1

Myiarchus ferox (Gmelin, 1789)

Myiarchus tyrannulus (Statius Mullen 1776)

Ramphotrigon ruficauda (Spix, 1825)

Attila phoenicurus Pelzeln, 1868* M

Attila dnnamomeus (Gmelin, 1789)

Attila spadiceus (Gmelin, 1789)

Cotingidae (8)

Phoenicircus camifex (Linnaeus, 1758)

Procnias albus (Flermann, 1783)* P

Upaugus vociferam (Wied, 1820)

Xipholena punicea (Palias, 1764)

Gymnoderus foeüdus (Linnaeus, 1758)

Querula purpurata (Statius Muller, 1776)

Haematoderus militaris (Shaw. 1792')» P

Perissocephalus ír/co/or (Statius Muller, 1776)* EN

Pipridae (13)

Neopelma pallescens (Lafresnaye, 1853)

Neopelma chrysocephaium (Pelzeln, 1868)* P

Tyranneutes virescens (Pelzeln, 1868)* EN

P/pr/íes c/?/or7s (lemminck, 1822)

Corapipo gutturalis (Linnaeus, 1766)* EN

Lepidothrix serena (Linnaeus, 1766)* EN

Machaeropterus pyrocephalus (Sclater, 1852)

rs

60

SciELO

Boi. Mus. Para. Emnio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat., Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 11-65, jan,- abr, 2011

2

cd

F TF-1, Col

R, 1, Col-T

C, TF-1, Col

U, TF-1

C, TF-1, Col

cd

R, TF-1

R, TF

R, TF-1

cd

C, TF-1, Col

FTF-I

C, TF-1

Z)

C, TF-1

U,TF

Maicuru

R, TF-I, Gol

O

U

LL.

1-

LLT

O

U

Lil

H

U-T

U, TF-I, Col

R, TF-1

U, TF-1

R, TF-1

U, TF-1

h-

Lir

1-

D

U, TF-1, T

R, TF-1

U, TF-I

R, TF-I

U, TF-1

cd

Lil

1-

ll:

hp

o

U

LL.-

1-

D

Grão-Pará

North

'o

U

LLT

1-

LLT

"Õ

U

LL.-

H

Z)‘

h-

ll:

h-

cd

R, TF

C, TF

R, TF

C, TF

R, TF

1-

LLT

1-

ü

1-

Ll_-

H

Ü

*T

0

U

ll:

1-

LLT

Grão-Pará

Centre

u

Ll_

LLT

C, FC, Col

C, TF-FC, Col-T

C, TF-FC, Col

R. TF-FC, Col

R, TF

R, TF-FC

U,TF

F TF-FC-Ce

R, TF

F TF-FC

R, TF

Grão-Pará

South

cd

U, FC, Col-T

F TF-FC, Col

C, TF-FC-1, Col

C, TF-FC, Col

o

U

LLT

1-

D

Lil

\-

Li_‘

1-

LLT

1-

o:

U,TF

u

Li_

cd

LL.

K

Li_-

U, TF-FC

F TF-FC-I

C, TF-FC-1

U,TF

Trombetas

hr

o

u

LL_-

H

D

0

U

LL_-

H

ü

0

U

U_-

H

u

U, TF Col-T

U, TF

1-

llt

1-

cd

U, TF

i-

LL_-

1-

I)

O

U

LLT

h-

LLT

U,TF

cd

1-

LLT

K

LLT

U, TF

D

Ll_

h-

LLT

O

U

LLT

I-

•LLT

Faro

F TF-1, Col-T

C, TF-l-FC,

Col-T

O

U

Lil.

H

ll:

U,TF

F TF-1, T

R, TF

H

LLT

H

LLT

F TF-1, T

U, l,T

1-

Lil

1-

LLT

1-

LLT

h-

D

Manacus manacus (Unnaeus, 1766)

Chiroxiphia pareola (Unnaeus, 1766)

Xenopipo atronitens Cabanis, 1847

Dixiphia pipra (Unnaeus, 1758)

Pipra aureola (Unnaeus, 1758)

Pipra erythrocephala (Unnaeus, 1758)

Trtyridae (10)

Oxyruncus cristatus Swainson, 1821

Schiffornis olivacea (Ridgway, 1906)* EN

Laniocera hypopyrra (Vieillot, 1817)

lodopleura fusca (Vieillot, 1817)* EN

Tityra cayana (Unnaeus, 1766)

Pachyramphus viridis gríseigularis

Salvin & Godman, 1883

Pachyramphus polychopterus (Vieillot, 1818)

Pachyramphus marginatus (Lichtenstein, 1823)

Pachyramphus surinamus (Unnaeus, 1766)* P

Pachyramphus minor (Lesson, 1830)

Vireonidae (8)

oo

c

*0;

E

U

S

Q;

c:

■|

1

Vireolanius leucotis (Swainson, 1838)

Vireo oUvaceus (Linnaeus, 1766)* M

Hylophilus thoracicus Temminck, 1822

Hylophilus semicinereus SdaterS Salvin, 1867

Hylophilus sclateri Salvin & Godman. 1883* EN

Hylophilus muscicapinus Sclater & Salvin, 1873

Hylophilus ochraceiceps Sclater, 1860

^ — rgoxi —^

61

.SciELO

20

TD

<V

_Ç

c

o

U

a

d?

uL

1-

af

Not

>

í£

D

es or

the

Üí

D

Verte

:brat

5S Of

nort:

Lil

1-

LLT

C, 1, Col 3 1

^ará,

Braz

1: (..

)ii,/

Vvifau

"õ

U

LLT

na

D

f-

ixr

H

ücf

R. 1, Col 1

0

U

Lil.

H

LLT

2

3

U

rd

z

Li-

1-

of

>

(Z

D

>

i£

o’

"õ

U

Ll_-

H

D

"õ

U

u!.

H

D

>

(Z

cd

[_

LLT

1-

cd

"õ

U

H

z5

Lt_

H

ca

ul.

H

D

\-

zS

hr

0

U

D

"õ

U

ul

1-

D

'2

o o

•e z

o

LJ_

1-

ll:

u-

1-

Ü

l-p

0

U

LLT

1-

ocf

h-

0

u

<£

"0

u

Li--

H

L±_-

1-

LLT

H

llt

"õ

U

U_"

H

U

'12

iS 5

'!2 u

U

qJ

U õ

^ u

u

U

Ü_

a:

1-

u_-

1-

z5

H

ü

Ll_

ul

1-

u

Ll_

1-

ccf

0

u

QJ

u

ú

u_

cd

QJ

VEt

U õ

^ u

ü

■5

u

H

Ü

'[2

O

"õ

u

LLT

H

z5

Ll_

K

üf

Er

0

LL.

1-

ü

of

u_

1-

cd

Ll_

H

of

ú

U-

ul

H

Ü

Ó

Ll_

cd

\-

U

"õ

U

U--

t-

Ü

on

rd

tj

Jd

E

H

D

\-

LLT

H

Z>

f-r

0

u

LLT

H

LLT

h;-

0

U

crf

Li-

H

D

"õ

u

Li_r

1-

d

Ll_

H

LLT

cd

Li_

1“

cd

1-

LLT

1-

of

"Õ

u

H

LLT

2

l2

>

LJJ-

"o

U

■i

LLT

>

ca

Li.-

H

ll:

1-

LLT

"Õ

u

>“

£

LLT

1-7

0

u

LLT

H

D

H7

0

U

Li_r

1 -

zS

H

LLT

t-

of

i-r

0

U

ji;

u_-

■q

U

>■

(Z

L±_-

h-

0

u

LLT

H

LLT

0)

rd

■O

'2

o

1 Cyanocorax cayanus (Linnaeus, 1766)* EN

S

0)

rd

■O

c

'td

c

a

I

00

ç‘

(U

E

U

2

•S

1

õ

00

c

'lA

d

■tf

1

♦3

«o

R

cõ

5

'05

1

6

S'

s

■5

•2

(b

S)

f

CO

tf

i)

rd

í

2

<u

-£

-l

s

<i)

rd

■0

■g

1

1 1 Microcerculus bambla (Boddaert, 1783)

ro

CNl

00

c

D

rd

z

i

e

«A

1

1 Pheugopedius coraya (Gmelin, 1789)

LO*

•d"

00

(U

c

«/>

â

S

i

*4!

-§

1

í

a-

CO

ví

'c

rd

X)

sâ

S

-0

i

fd

.c

í

1

00

c

rd

i

<L)

■§

.c

1

(U

rd

•^3

Cl

0

£

60 '

vO

00

c

0 )

1

“§

2

1

Qn

00

Z

'05

i

-S

<u

S

3

s

3

0

co'

CO

ç

(L>

E

U

fd

1

jd

■«a

Z

LU

«

0

rs

0

‘U

1

.§

§0

•2

‘a

.§■

5

£

<u

rd

■D

■E

00

ro

05

Qj

1

a

-2

1

m

CM

00

c

■<U

t?;

c

QJ

•»-*

x:

«j

l_i

S

.§3

1

h5

ON

j5

X)

3

SZ

U

¥

1

.to

.1

1

h2

00

cõ

05

:>

■i3

.8

=2

fd

1

^ 1

QJ

rd

“D

X)

E

QJ

0

U

cm 1 2

3 4 5

1

|il

i

8

"'SciELÕ|lf'"

13

1

.4

15

16

17

ii

19 20

cm

Boi, Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc, Nat., Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p, 11-65, jan.- abr. 2011

B

£

cd

U, TF-1

D

U, TF-I

O

U

U_“

H

cd

U, TF-I

R, TF-I

F TF-I, Gol

0

u

LLT

cd

R, TF

cd

R, TF-1, T

1-

cd

Maicuru

U, TF-I, T

U, TF-I

af

R, TF-I

U, TF-I, Col-T

R, TF-I, T

1-

Li_r

1-

D

R, l-Riv, Gol

R, l-Riv

R, TF

R, TF-1

U, TF-I, T

R, TF-I

R, l-Riv

Grão-Paná

North

F TF Gol

U,TF

R, TF

U, TF Col-T

h-

ll:

l-

af

"Õ

u

LLT

H

LLT

C,TF

Li_

1-

D

R, TF

R, TF Col-T

R, TF

Grão-Rará

Centre

3

y

LLT

C, FC-Ce, Gol

U, Ce, Gol

U, TF-FC, Gol

C, FC-Ce,

Gol

U, FC-Ce

R, TF

R, FC-Ce, Gol

R, TF

O

U

o;

U

LLT

R, TF-FC-Ce

Grão-Pará

South

U, TF-FC-I

U-

f-

LLT

R, TF-FC-1

u

u.

üL

1-

ur

R, TF

R, TF-FC

R, TF

cd

R, FC-1

U, FC-I

R,TF

U, TF-FC-1, Gol

R, FC

R, FC, Gol

R, TF

R, FC, Gol

U, TF-FC-1

U, TF-FC, Col

R, TF-FC

Trombetas

U, TF-O, T

LL.

H

LLT

U, TF-I

U,TF

O

U

LLT

H

LLT

h7

O

U

L±_-

H

ixr

U, 1-0

1-

LL_-

1-

T)

1-

LLT

1-

LJ_-

H

LLT

H

3

U,TF

R, TF

U,TF

o

U

U,'

H-

3'

U, TF

R,TF

Faro

C, 1, T

F TF-I, T

H

us

h-

LLT

U,TF

U, TF-I, Gol

U, TF-I, Col-T

F l-Riv

>

'(Z

LLT

>

cZ

L±.-

h-

Li_r

1-

3

Coereba flaveola (Linnaeus, 1758)

Thraupidae (30)

Saltatorgrossus (Linnaeus, 1766)

Saltator maximus (Statius Muller, 1776)

Schistochiamys melanopis (Latham, 1790)

Lamprospiza melanoleuca (Vieillot, 1817)

Tachyphonus cristatus (Linnaeus, 1766)

Tachyphonus surinamus (Linnaeus, 1766)

Tachyphonusphoenidus Swainson, 1838* P

Lanio fulvus (Boddaert, 1783)

Ramphocelus carbo (Palias, 1764)

Thraupis episcopus (Linnaeus, 1766)

Thraupis paJmarum (Wled, 1823)

Cyanicterus cyanicterus (Vieillot, 1819)* P

Tangara mexicana (Linnaeus, 1766)

Tangara chilensis (Vigors, 1832)

Tangara punctata (Linnaeus, 1766)

Tangara guttata (Cabanis, 1850)* P

Tangara varia (Statius Muller, 1776)* P

Tangara gyrola (Linnaeus, 1758)

Tangara cayana (Linnaeus, 1766)

Tangara velia (Linnaeus, 1758)

Tersina viridis (llliger, 1811)

Dacnis albiventris (Sclater, 1852) * P

Dacnis lineata (Gmelin, 1789)

Dacnis cayana (Linnaeus, 1766)

íC

CO

D

ro

rO

I

í

C

1

IS Cl SI

63

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: (...) II. Avifauna

•U

(U

D

c

0

y

E

£

Ll_

h-

CH

LL

h-

CC

R, TF-1

R, TF-I

R, 1-Riv

U, TF-1, Col

>

cC

o

U

LLT

U, TF-1

F TF-I, Col

U,TF

c

C

LL.

H

U

1-

LU-

Maicuru

R, TF-I

R, TF-I, T

R, 1-Riv

R, TF

D

U, TF-1

U, TF-I, Col

1-

lu-

H

af

R, TF-1

U. TF-1

of

Grao-Rará

North

R, TF

o

U

LL.-

1-

D

LL.

f-

LLT

O

U

LLT

H

of

f-

LU‘

1-

LU-

R, TF

Grão-Pará

Centre

U.TF

U, FC-Ce,

Col-T

R, TF-FC

U, Ce, Col-T

F Ce, Col

Li-

I-

3

R, Ce, Col

"o

u

of

C, TF-FC

R, FC-Ce

Grão-Pará

SoLith

R, TF-FC

R, FC

U, TF-FC, Col

O

U

ll:

1-

ccf

of

C, TF Col

F TF-FC, Col

LU

H

LU-

R, TF-1, Col

0

U

U_-

1-

U

Trombetas

U, TF Col-T

1-

u.-

1-

z5

U, TF

O

U

ÜJ-

1-

LLT

U, TF

"Õ

u

LU-

1-

ll:

H-

LL.-

h-

3'

LU

h-

LLT

Faro

U, Riv

F Riv, Col

U, Riv, Col

1-

LLT

1-

3

F TF-I, Col-T

LÚ

F-

LU-

R, FC

Cyanerpes caeruleus (Linnaeus, 1758)

Cyanerpes cyaneus (Linnaeus, 1766)

Chbrophanes spiza {Ur\naeus, 1758)

Hemithraupis guira (Linnaeus, 1766)

Hemithraupis flavicollis (Vieillot, 1818)

Emberizidae (8)

Zonotrichia capensis (Statius Muller, 1776)

Volatinia Jacarina (Linnaeus, 1766)

Sporophila americana (Gmelin, 1789)

Sporophila lineola (Linnaeus, 1758)

Sporophila angpknsis (Linnaeus, 1766)

Shorobhila (crassirostris/maximilianí)* T U irM/MT5

Arremon tadtumus (Hermann, 1783)

Paroaria gularis {Unnaeus, 1766)

Cardinalidae (4)

Piranga rubra (Linnaeus. 1758)"^ M

Granatellus peizeini Sclster, 1865

Caryothraustes canadensis (Linnaeus, 1766)

Cyanoloxia cyanoides (Lafresnaye, 1847)

Rarulidae (2)

cõ

'03

.1

1

Phaeothlypis mesoleuca (Sclater, 1866)* EN

Icteridae (6)

Psarocolius viridis (Statius Muller, 1776)

Psarocolius decumanus (Palias, 1769)

— Igosi

64

SciELO

19 2

See the SporophHa {crassirostris/maximilianí) species account in the 'Noteworthy records' section for details.

(Conclusion)

Boi. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi. Gene. Nat., Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 11-65, jan,- abr. 2011

Paru

1-

U, TF-I, T

R, TF-I

Maicuru

U, TF-I

R, Riv

üf

U, TF-I, T

U, TF-I

Grão-Pará

North

H

LLT

H

of

U,TF

Grão-Pará

Centre

C, FC-Ce, T

H

LLT

1-

of

Grão-Pará

South

K

líL

H

LLT

cC

al

f~

i_Lr

1-

ll:

R, TF

U_

[-

LLT

Trombetas

U,TF

U, TF-I

H

Ll_"

1-

LLT

1-

LLT

H

D

Ll_

h-

LUT

Faro

F TF-I-Ftiv

R, Riv

R, 1-Riv

U, Riv

U, TF-1, Col-T

U, TF-I, T

Cacicus haemorrhous (Linnaeus, 1766)

Cacicus cela (Linnaeus, 1758)

Icterus cayanensis (Linnaeus, 1766)

Molothrus oryzivoivs (Gmelin, 1788)

Fringillidae (6)

Euphonia plúmbea Du Bus, 1855* P

Euphonia chloroPca (Linnaeus, 1766)

Euphonia violacea (Linnaeus, 1758)

Euphonia chrysopasta Sdater & Salvin, 1869

Euphonia minuta Cabanis, 1849

Euphonia cayennensis (Gmelin, 1789)

65

,SciELO

Boi, Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat., Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 61 - 72 , jan,- abr. 2011

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: a forgotten part of the

Guianan Region, III. A new species of Microcaecilia (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Caeciliidae)

Notas sobre os vertebrados do norte do Pará, Brasil: uma parte esquecida da Região das

Guianas, III. Uma nova espécie óe Microcaecilia (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Caeciliidae)

Adriano Oliveira Maciel', Marinus Steven Hoogmoed'

'Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Coordenação de Zoologia

Abstract; A new species of Microcaecilia is described from the municipality of Óbidos, State of Pará, in the Brazilian part of the

Guianan Region. The new species has a high number of secondary annuli, monocuspid vomeropalatine teeth, and other

characteristics that together differentiate it from the other eight known species of the genus..

Keywords: Brazil. Guianan Region. Gymnophiona. Microcaecilia. New species.

Resumo: Uma nova espécie de Microcaecilia é descrita do município de Óbidos, estado do Pará, na porção brasileira da região das

Guianas. A nova espécie tem um número alto de anéis secundários, dentes vomero-palatinos monocúspides e outras

características que, em conjunto, a diferencia das outras oito espécies conhecidas para o gênero.

Palavras-chave: Brasil. Região das Guianas. Gymnophiona. Microcaecilia. Nova espécie.

Como citar este artigo: MACIEL, A, O. & M. S. HOOGMOED, 2011. Notes on the Vertebrates of northern F^rá, Brazil: a forgotten part of the

Guianan Region, III. A new species olMicrocaecilia (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Caeciliidae). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi.

Ciências Naturais 6(1): 67-72.

Autor para correspondência: Adriano Oliveira Maciel. Museu Fáraense Emílio Goeldi. Coordenação de Zoologia. Av. Perimetral, 1901 - Terra

Rme. Belém, PA, Brasil. CEP 66077-830 (aombiologo@yahoo.com.br).

Recebido em 17A12/2011

Aprovado em 18A)3/2011

Responsabilidade editorial: Hilton Tulio Costi

67

cm i

cSciELO^

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: (...) III. A new species of Microcaedlia

INTRODUCTION

The genus Microcaedlia Taylor, 1968 contains eight

recognized species, most from Amazónia, north of

the Amazon river, except for M. taylori Nussbaum &

Hoogmoed, 1979, which is distributed from the Guianan

Region to south of the Amazon river in the State of

Pará, Brazil (Maciel & Hoogmoed, in press), and M.

supernumeraria Taylor, 1969, which has São Paulo as type

locality (considered "imprecise” by Frost, 2011), with no

additional records since its description based on one

specimen (Taylor, 1969),

Recently three new species were described from

the Guianan Region, M. grandis Wilkinson, Nussbaum &

Hoogmoed, 2009 from Suriname, M. iyob Wilkinson &

Kok, 2010 from Guyana, and a third species by Maciel

& Hoogmoed (in press) from northeastern Pará, Brazil,

all based on few type specimens (one, one, and four,

respectively), Here we describe a new species from the

Brazilian part ofthe Guianan Region based on one specimen

recently collected during one of the expeditions of the Calha

Norte Project (Avila-Pires et ai, 2010) to northern Pará,

Brazil. Probably other new species Microcaedlia, will be

recognized as indicated in the recent literature (Wilkinson

et ai, 2009; Maciel & Hoogmoed, in press).

TAXONOMY

Species description

Microcaedlia trombetas sp. nov.

Microcaedlia unicolor: Avila-Pires et al. 2010: 68,109.

Holotype: MPEG 26476 (Field number CN502), mature

male. Floresta Estadual (FLOTA) Trombetas (S 0° 57’ 45.97"

W 55° 3Í 20.28"), municipality of Óbidos, State of Fárá, Brazil,

21-1V-2008, collected by M. S. Hoogmoed and W Rocha.

Diagnosis: Primary annuli 116. Secondary grooves

91. Eye notvisible. Premaxillary-maxillary teeth extending

beyond the levei of the posterior margin of the choanae.

Vomeropalatine teeth monocuspid. Small terminal shield,

one half (only on left side) annular groove beyond posterior

levei of the vent. Dermal scales starting at 8th annular

groove; no indication for the presence of subdermal scales.

Microcaedlia trombetas sp. nov. differs from most

other Microcaedlia (except M. supernumeraria with 93

secondary grooves instead of 91 in M. trombetas sp. nov.)

in having a higher number of secondary grooves and from

M. rabei (Roze & Solano, 1963), M. taylori Nussbaum &

Hoogmoed, 1979, M. grandis Wilkinson, Nussbaum &

Hoogmoed, 2009, M. iyob Wilkinson & Kok, 2010, and

Microcaedlia sp. nov. Maciel & Hoogmoed (in press), in

having monocuspid instead of bicuspid vomeropalatine

teeth; from M. iyob it also differs in having more primary

annuli, 116 instead of 97. It differs from M. supernumeraria

in having distinctly less primary folds (116 instead of 143),

in the scales starting at the 8th annular groove (instead

of at the first primary groove), in having higher numbers

of vomeropalatine and dentary teeth and in having a less

slender body (length/width 34.1 instead of 41.6 times).

Description of the holotype: An adult male

(Figure 1) with a total length of 218 mm. Multiple testis

lobes and abundant fat bodies. Phallodeum partially

extruded (Figure 2), consisting of a short (2.5 mm)

cylinder (diameter 1.6 mm) which at the top shows a

vertically divided inverted part that could not be everted

further. A longitudinal ventral incision of approximately

25 mm is present near mid body. Total length 34.1 times

body width. Head slightly narrowerthan body; dorsum of

head slightly convex in lateral view. Margin of the upper

jaw curving down, with the highest point ofthe concavity

formed at the levei of the tentacle openings. Snout

projects 1.2 mm beyond mouth. Tip of snout rounded

in dorsal and lateral views. Mouth slightly opened, with

premaxillary-maxillary and dentary teeth visible externally.

Nostrils subcircular, visible from above. Eyes not visible.

Tentacle openings circular and slightly elevated above the

skin, laterally positioned, near margin of mouth, slightly

closer to comer of mouth than to nostrils, visible from

68

cm

SciELO

L2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Boi. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat., Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. bl-ll, jan.- abr. 2011

Rgure 1. HolotypeofA1/crocaec/y/a trombetas sp. nov. (MPEG 26A76). Leftcolumn posterior partofbodywith partially extended phallodeum,

dorsally (above), laterally (middle) and ventrally (below). Right column head and anterior part of body, dorsally (above), laterally (middle)

and ventrally (below). White bar represents 5 mm. Photos: Ângelo C. M. Dourado.

above, Nuchal grooves distinct dorsally, laterally and

ventrally, except the third which ventrally is incomplete.

First collar narrower than second; distance between flrst

and second nuchal groove 1.6 mm, and distance between

second and third nuchal groove 2.6 mm. A dorsal

transverse groove is present on each collar, smaller on

the First one. A very thin longitudinal ventral groove (only

visible under stereo zoom microscope) appears on the

first nuchal collar runningfrom the second nuchal groove

to the throat. There is another very thin transverse groove

on the ventral surface of the first nuchal collar, forming a

cross with the other one. Body semi-cylindrical, slightly

wider than deep. Width along the body may slightly vary,

narrower at the terminal region. Primary annuli 116.

Primary annular grooves completely encircling the body,

except a few grooves that are ventrally incomplete (7,

8, and 19 - 31), and two (plus one secondary groove)

that are interrupted by the vent. Secondary grooves 91;

69 of them complete, starting between primary annular

grooves 24 and 25. A small terminal shield; one half

cm

(

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil; (...) 111. A new species ofMicrocaecilia

Figure 2. Holotype oíMicrocaecilia trombetas sp. nov. (MPEG IGM/G).

Detail extended phallodeum. Photo: AOM.

(only on left side) secondary annular groove posterior to

the levei of the posterior margin of the vent. Vent with

twelve denticulations: six on the anterior and six on the

posterior margin. Dermal scales starting at 8th annular

groove, with at mostfour rows per body annulus. Scales

at 8th primary groove small and narrow, (0.2 x 0.4 mm);

larger posteriorly (e.g. 0.7 x 0.9 mm at 100th primary

annulus). Choanae circular, dueto the preservation itwas

not possible to measure them. Tongue anteriorly attached

to the mandibular mucosa, no narial plugs on tongue.

Premaxillary-maxillary teeth 17, with littie variation in size,

posterior maxillary teeth smaller. Premaxillary-maxillary

series extending posteriorly to beyond the levei of the

posterior margin of the choanae. Vomeropalatine teeth

21, monocuspid, with no apparent variation in size; teeth

smaller than in all other series. Dentary teeth 15, slightly

larger than premaxillary-maxillary teeth; size of teeth

decreasing posteriorly. More data in Table 1.

Colour: Holotype in life “Body purplish blue.

Lower jaw pink with inner side bordered by white, throat

[including ventral part of first nuchal collar] blueish. Area

around vent pink" (fieldnotes MSH). In preservative the

body is dark gray and the light areas mentioned above

are cream. An U-shaped, cream area on the snout that

connects the nostrils. Mandibles covered by a U-shaped

cream area. The tongue, mandibular mucosa and palatal

mucosa are grey, the palatal region darker than the rest.

Etymology; The name of the species refers to the

type-locality, FLOTATrombetas, and is a noun in apposition.

Distribution; The species is only known from the type

locality on the Southern part of the Guianan Region (Rgure 3).

Natural history: The specimen was collected in

‘terra-firme’ (non-inundated) forest in a pitfall (no. 15 in

trail 1) installed at an altitude of 350 m. For a description

of the general area of FLOTA Trombetas see Avila-Pires

et al. (2010).

Table 1. Morphometric and meristic data (in mm) for the holotype of

Microcaecilia trombetas sp. nov. Between brackets total length in life.

Total Length (in life)

218 (227)

Weight in life

6.4 grams

Head width at jaw articulation

5.2

Flead length

6.9

Flead height at corner of the mouth

3.9

Height at mid-body

5.4

Width at mid-body

6.4

Width at the first nuchal collar

5.8

Wdth at five folds behind the vent

5.6

Wdth at the vent levei

3.2

Intertentacular distance

4

Distance tentacle to nostril

2.3

Distance tentacle to corner of mouth

2.6

Distance tentacle to margin of mouth

0.7

Internarial distance

1.3

Distance nostril to margin of mouth

1.2

Snout projecting beyond mouth

1.2

Primary annuli

116

Secondary grooves

91

Complete secondary grooves

69

Annular grooves interrupted by vent

3

Premaxillary-maxillary teeth

17

Vomeropalatine teeth

21

Dentary teeth

15

Total length/Width at mid-body

34.1

70

cm

SciELO

L2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

GUYANÁ

VENEZUELA

FRENCH/Gtl|ANA

;URINAME

RORAIMA

A MAPA

PARA

AMAZONAS^

7

BRAZIL

Boi. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat, Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 67-72, jan.- abr. 2011

DISCUSSION

In the Guianan Region, Microcaediia is the most diverse genus

of Gymnophiona, and recently some new species have been

described, eitherfrom specimens collected recently orfrom

specimens that earlier had been relegated to other species.

Taylor (1968) designated a lectotype hr Microcaediia unicolor

from Cayenne, French Guiana and described a specimen from

Guyana under that name. Taylor (1969, 1972) recognized

that in his monograph of 1968 he referred the specimen of

Guyana to Al. un/co/or with "some hesrtancy” dueto the lower

number of annuli and higher number of premaxillary-maxillary

teeth than in the other known specimens from French Guiana.

Wilkinson et aJ. (2009) State that the specimen studied by

Taylor (1968) from Guyana and the specimens from Suriname

cited as A^. unicolor by Nussbaum & Hoogmoed (1979), are

possibly undescribed species, or in the case of the Suriname

specimens that they could represent juveniles of Al. grandis.

Recently, Wilkinson&Kok(2010)describedA4. iyob, basedon

the same Guyanan specimen that earlier was used by Taylor

(1968) for his description under Al. unicolor.

Maciel & Hoogmoed (in press) made a taxonomic

study of the Gymnophiona of Brazilian Amazônia, and in

70° W

10° N-

60° W

50° W

250

Rgure 3. Map of the distribution of the genus Microcaedia in the Guianan Region (limits indicated by the line of dots and dashes) and adjacent

part of F^rá. Type localities indicated by numbers. M. rabei (stars, 1), M, iyob (cross, 2), M. unicolor (asterisk, 3), M. grandis (triangle, 4), Af.

taybri (pentagons, 5), M. trombetas (dot, 6), M. sp. nov. Maciel & Hoogmoed (in press) (squares, 7).

cm

(

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: (...) III. A new species o\MicrocaedUa

that paper cite some specimens oi Microcaediia from the

Guianan Region that could represent undescribed forms,

Avila-Pires et aí. (2010) erroneously considered the

specimen here described to be M. unicolor and they cited

its presence in FLOTA Trombetas underthat name, Upon

closer study of this specimen it turned out to belong to a

species differentfrom M. unicolor, which is here described,

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Angelo C. M. Dourado madethe photos ofthe holotype.

The first author was supported financially by the Gonselho

Nacional de Desenvolvimento Gientífico e Tecnológico

(GNPq 132729/2007-5). Gonservação Internacional

(Cl-Brasil) financed travei from Belém to Santarém and

the costs of staying in the field. Mining company Rio Tinto

covered the costs of transport from Santarém to FLOTA

Trombetas and was responsible for logistics in the field.

The field work was done under license 001/2008 ofthe

Secretaria Estadual do Meio Ambiente (SEMA-PA).

REFERENCES

AVILA-PIRES, T C. S., M, S, HOOGMOED & W. A, ROCHA, 2010.

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: a forgotten part of

the Guianan Region, I. Herpetofauna. Boletim do Museu Paraense

Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Naturais 5(1): 13-112,

FROST D. R., 2011. Amphibian species of the world: an online

reference, American Museum of Natural History, New York.

Version 5.5. Availableat: <http://research.amnh.orgA/z/herpetology/

amphibia/>. Accessed on: 15 February 2011,

MACIEL, A. O, & M. S. HOOGMOED. Taxonomy and distribution of

Gymnophiona of Brazilian Amazónia with a key to their Identification.

Zootaxa (in press).

NUSSBAUM, R. A. &M. S. HOOGMOED, 1979. Surinam caedlians,

with notes on Rhinatrema bivittatum and the description of a new

species of Microcaediia (Amphibia, Gymnophiona). Zoologische

Mededelingen 54(14): 217-235.

TAYLOR, E. H., 1968, The Caecilians of the World, Ataxonomic

review: 1-848. University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.

TAYLOR, E. H., 1969. A new caecilian from Brasil. University of

Kansas Science Bulletin 48: 307-313.

TAYLOR, E. H., 1972. Squamation in caecilians, with an atlas of scales.

University of Kansas Science Bulletin 49: 989-1164.

WILKINSON, M., R. A. NUSSBAUM & M. S. HOOGMOED, 2009.

A new species oíMicrocaediia (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Caeciliidae)

from Surinam. Herpetologica 65(4): 413-418.

WILKINSON, M, & R J. R. KOK, 2010. A new species of Microcaediia

(Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Caeciliidae) from Guyana. Zootaxa

2719: 35-40.

^ — rcdisi — 1 -

72

SciELO

Memória

*

Boi. Mus. Rara. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat., Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 75-87, jan.- abr. 2011

Obituário de Osvaldo Rodrigues da Cunha (1928-2011)

Marinus Steven Hoogmoed

Coordenação de Zoologia, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi

Teresa Cristina Sauer de Avila-Pires

Coordenação de Zoologia, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi

Nelson Sanjad

Coordenação de Comunicação e Extensão, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi

No dia 11 de março de 2011, faleceu Osvaldo Rodrigues

da Cunha (Figuras 1, 2 e 7), pesquisador aposentado do

Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (MPEG), fundador do setor

de herpetologia e da coleção herpetológica da instituição,

incansável estudioso dos répteis da Amazônia e também

da história científica da região, especialmente com relação

ao MPEG e às pessoas a ele vinculadas ao longo do tempo.

Cunha faleceu em Belém, aos 82 anos de idade, depois de

três anos com a saúde debilitada e de ter perdido a visão.

Osvaldo Cunha nasceu no dia 6 de abril de 1928,

em Belém do Pará, Brasil, como primogênito do casal

português Carlos Pereira da Cunha e Ana Cerqueira

Rodrigues da Cunha, os quais tiveram ainda mais um filho e

duas filhas. Cursou a escola primária e o ginásio em Belém,

até 1946. Segundo seu próprio testemunho, recusou-se

a seguir o curso universitário oferecido à sua época, pois

o considerou inadequado aos estudos de história natural

a que queria se dedicar, influenciado por sua convivência,

desde menino, com o Parque Zoobotânico do MPEG, do

qual era vizinho. Preferiu preparar-se a partir da prática

do trabalho no museu e estudando nas bibliotecas dessa

instituição e na do Museu Nacional do Rio de Janeiro

(MN RJ), onde encontrou um vasto acendo sobre a literatura

zoológica que lhe interessava. Aos poucos, foi ele mesmo

adquirindo também uma valiosa biblioteca.

Em 1945, ingressou no MPEG como estagiário da

então Seção de Zoologia. Iniciou estudando borboletas

e besouros dos arredores de Belém, especialmente

das matas de Utinga e Icoaraci, atualmente bastante

reduzidas. Entre 1947 e 1954, fez algumas viagens de

campo para coletar material para as coleções do MPEG

no entorno da capital e no baixo Amazonas, rio Tapajós

(área de Fordlândia e ao sul de Itaituba) e rio Tocantins.

Em 1948, realizou, por seis meses, o serviço militar na

base da Aeronáutica em Belém, período em que precisou

interromper seus estudos zoológicos.

Osvaldo tinha talentos científicos e também artísticos.

Entre 1948 e 1963, fez vários desenhos, tanto em nanquim

como a lápis, retratando pessoas, paisagens e alguns

animais. Reproduzimos aqui dois desses desenhos: o

retrato de EmOio Goeldi (1859-1917), feito a partir de uma

fotografia existente no arquivo do MPEG (Figura 3); e um

hemíptero (Figura 4).

De setembro de 1949 até janeiro de 1951, Cunha

estagiou na Divisão de Zoologia do MN RJ. Durante esse

tempo, frequentou cursos ali ministrados em Biologia,

Anatomia Comparada, Estatística aplicada à Biologia, História

Natural Prática e Biologia Geral. Retomando a Belém e

ao MPEG, passou a ocupar-se mais com os vertebrados,

especialmente com os répteis. Cunha justificou seu novo

interesse em razão da influência que recebeu de Antenor

Leitão de Cangalho (1910-1985), então chefe da Seção de

Répteis do MNRJ, que conhecera durante o estágio.

No dia 17 de dezembro de 1953, Osvaldo Cunha

foi nomeado 'Naturalista Padrão R’ do MPEG. No final

de 1955, foi transferido para a Divisão de Geologia

da instituição, onde trabalhou sob a orientação de

Cândido Simões Ferreira, em projeto sobre a Formação

75

W\

SciELO

2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

cm

(

Obituário de Osvaldo Rodrigues da Cunha (1928-2011)

Figura 1, Osvaldo Rodrigues da Cunha em 1991, com um exemplar de Chironius carinatus (Linnaeus, 1758) da coleção herpetológica do

MPEG. Fotografia de Janduari Simões. Acervo de Osvaldo Rodrigues da Cunha.

Pirabas, no leste do Pará. Entre 1957 e 1962, respondeu

provisoriamente pela Divisão. As contribuições de Cunha

à Geologia e Paleontologia foram reconhecidas durante

o XXI Congresso Brasileiro de Paleontologia, ocorrido

em Belém, em 2009. Nessa ocasião, foi homenageado

por sua colaboração na reativação dos estudos e das

coleções geológicas e paleontológicas do MPEG, e pela

obra pioneira e detalhada sobre o conteúdo malacológico

da Formação Pirabas.

Em 1962, Cunha retornou à Divisão de Zoologia

do MPEG. Ainda no período em que estava na Divisão

de Geologia, publicou seus primeiros trabalhos sobre os

lagartos da Amazônia brasileira. A publicação de 1961,

um estudo preliminar sobre os lagartos ("11, Lacertílios

da Amazônia”), abordando as várias espécies então

conhecidas, representou o primeiro trabalho de maior

abrangência sobre um grupo da herpetofauna sul-

americana. O estudo foi baseado apenas no material

cm

Boi. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat., Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 75-87, jan.- abr. 2011

Figura 2. Silhueta de Osvaldo Rodrigues da Cunha feita por ele

mesmo em 1961. Acervo de Osvaldo Rodrigues da Cunha.

'-1

%

Rgura 3. Desenho a lápis de Emílio Goeldi, feito por Osvaldo Rodrigues

da Cunha em 1948. Acen/o de Osvaldo Rodrigues da Cunha.

da coleção do MPEG, mas esse trabalho pioneiro foi

o fundamento para outros estudos mais abrangentes

sobre o assunto, por exemplo, o estudo de Avila-Pires

(1995, “Lizards of Brazilian Amazônia", Zoõlogische

Verhandelingen, n. 299), que incorporou também material

dos principais museus da Europa e dos Estados Unidos.

Aquele segundo trabalho de Cunha sobre lagartos foi

seguido por mais seis da mesma série, até o ano de 1981.

O número IV da série "Lacertílios da Amazônia" (Cunha,

1970) tratou da descrição de uma nova espécie e um

novo gênero {Amapasaurus tetradactylus), baseada em

dois exemplares coletados em 1960 e 1969 no então

Território Federal do Amapá. Somente entre 2004 e 2006,

esse lagarto veio novamente a ser coletado no Amapá.

Em 2008, a espécie também foi encontrada no norte do

Pará (Avila-Pires, Hoogmoed & Rocha, 2010, Boletim do

Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Naturais, 5(1)).

De setembro de 1963 até dezembro de 1964, Cunha

foi estagiar com Paulo Emílio Vanzolini, diretor do Museu

de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo (MZUSP) e

herpetólogo treinado nos Estados Unidos. Esse estágio

lhe permitiu aprofundar os conhecimentos sobre répteis,

por ter acesso à biblioteca herpetológica de Vanzolini e

por participar em trabalhos científicos, palestras, reuniões

e seminários. Nesse mesmo período, encontrou também

Alphonse Richard Hoge (1912-1982), chefe da Seção de

Herpetologia do Instituto Butantan, em São Paulo.

Em 1966, Cunha foi nomeado ‘Pesquisador em

Zoologia' do MPEG. Em junho de 1965, instalou a Seção

de Herpetologia da instituição, com um acervo inicial

de 650 espécimes (a coleção de serpentes coletadas

entre 1896 e 1916, durante as gestões de Emílio Goeldi,

jacques Huber e Emília Snethlage, havia sido enviada ao

Instituto Butantan e nunca foi devolvida). No mesmo ano.

77

cm i

,SciEL0

2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Obituário de Osvaldo Rodrigues da Cunha (1928-2011)

Figura 4. Desenho a nanquim de um hemíptero, feito por Osvaldo

Rodrigues da Cunha no Rio de Janeiro, em 1950. Acervo de Osvaldo

Rodrigues da Cunha.

Cunha começou a orientar os trabalhos herpetológicos

de Francisco Paiva do Nascimento, que viria a ser seu

principal colaborador, com resultados muito frutíferos

para o conhecimento da herpetofauna amazônica,

especialmente do Pará, e para a coleção herpetológica do

MPEG. Depois da entrada de Nascimento na Seção de

Herpetologia, ambos desenvolveram diversos projetos

e Nascimento realizou trabalhos de campo no Amapá,

Maranhão, Pará, Rondônia e Roraima, que resultaram em

novas publicações por Cunha e Nascimento.

A fim de realizar um inventário o mais completo

possível da herpetofauna. Cunha e Nascimento

desenvolveram um sistema simples, mas efetivo, de

obter exemplares para a coleção. Estabeleceram contatos

com moradores em uma série de localidades no leste

do Pará e, posteriormente, também no sul do estado

e oeste do Maranhão (ver os mapas nos trabalhos de

Cunha e Nascimento sobre os ofídios dessas áreas). Em

cada um desses locais, treinaram uma pessoa para fixar os

exemplares encontrados (injetando nos animais formol a

4%, ou seja, uma parte de formol e nove partes de água),

os quais, posteriormente, eram colocados em um tambor

com álcool a 70-80% (todo o material era acondicionado

no local, já nas diluições desejadas). Aproximadamente a

cada mês (ou em intervalos maiores, no caso de áreas

de mais difícil acesso), eles visitavam cada um dos locais,

recolhendo o material coletado. Dessa forma, exemplares

encontrados no dia a dia das pessoas, inclusive durante o

preparo da roça, por exemplo, puderam ser incorporados

à coleção. Isso permitiu a coleta de espécies dificilmente

encontradas durante expedições, por serem raras ou

difíceis de detectar. Assim, a coleção herpetológica do

MPEG cresceu muito em relativamente pouco tempo.

Esse sistema foi especialmente útil para as serpentes, cuja

coleta é usualmente esporádica, e para os répteis e anfíbios

fossoriais, respectivamente, Amphisbaenidae (mãe-de-

saúva, cobras-de-duas-cabeças) e Gymnophiona (cobras-

cegas). Resultou também na coleta de uma grande série

de alguns lagartos, entre os quais vale destacar õíenocercus

dumerílii (Steindachner, 1867), até então conhecido apenas

por uns poucos exemplares. Essa série foi a base de uma

publicação com a redescrição da espécie (sob o nome

Ophryoessoides tricristatus) e com notas sobre sua ecologia

e distribuição (Cunha, 1981).

O abundante material obtido a partir dessas coletas

constituiu a base da série pioneira e seminal intitulada "C>fídios

da Amazônia", de autoria de Cunha e Nascimento, com

numeração de 1 a XXll (o número 1 foi publicado por Cunha

como único autor e o número Xll contou com Hoge como

coautor). De especial interesse foi o número X, 'As cobras da

região Leste do Pará" (Cunha & Nascimento, 1978), que se

tornou um clássico para estudos de serpentes da Amazônia

(Figura 5). Em 1993, foi publicado um segundo livro,

anunciado como segunda edição, mas que, na realidade, é

mais um complemento ao primeiro livro, contendo dados

^— rs ó - gs —^

78

SciELO

Boi, Mus, Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat,, Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 75-87, jan.- abr. 2011

Ç*»v

Figura 5. Capa da publicação ‘As cobras da região leste do Pará",

de 1978.

socií-uad:- brasiuira de

HEREETO

Momenagem

da SíBM poH. ocasião- do-

3° Congvesso- íBvasiteõio- do 3(oKpetoiopia

pana

Gôiuddo- Ütodnigueó da Cunha

peo suas pesquisas pumeioas so6w

a Mexpetofauaa da (Imazâaia êmsitevui

SSetém, ífaxá, 15 do juiâo de 2007

Figura 6, Flomenagem da Sociedade Brasileira de Herpetologia a

Osvaldo Rodrigues da Cunha, 2007.

adicionais à publicação de 1978 e outras fotos (em preto e

branco), incluindo 87 espécies (12 a mais que no trabalho

original). Este foi o último trabalho em herpetologia de

Cunha (e também de Nascimento).

No momento da aposentadoria de Cunha, em

1990, a coleção herpetológica do MPEG contava com

38.000 exemplares, um aumento de quase 60 vezes em

comparação com o número de exemplares existentes em

1965. Constituía, então, a maior coleção herpetológica

com material da Amazônia brasileira e a terceira do Brasil.

A coleção continuou a crescer após a aposentadoria de

Cunha, contando atualmente com aproximadamente

86.000 exemplares. Ainda está entre as três maiores

coleções herpetológicas do Brasil, sendo a maior com

relação à herpetofauna amazônica.

Quando, em 1985, a coleção herpetológica foi

transferida para um novo prédio, no Campus de Pesquisa

do MPEG, Osvaldo Cunha preferiu permanecer em

sua antiga sala, no Parque Zoobotânico, afastando-se

da coleção, Esse foi um momento decisivo na carreira

de Cunha, a partir do qual sua produção científica sobre

herpetologia declinou. Depois da mudança da coleção, ele

publicou apenas quatro trabalhos herpetológicos, sendo

dois como terceiro coautor.

Os trabalhos sobre herpetofauna amazônica de

Cunha e Nascimento formam uma boa base para estudos

mais abrangentes sobre os répteis da região, os quais

continuam a ser desenvolvidos por pesquisadores do

MPEG e, mais recentemente, da Universidade Federal do

Pará, junto com graduandos, mestrandos e doutorandos

em herpetologia. Pode-se afirmar, ainda, que, ao menos

em parte, Osvaldo Cunha foi o responsável pela presença

desses pesquisadores nas duas instituições do Pará. Sem

seu trabalho pioneiro e a coleção herpetológica que

79

cm i

,SciEL0

2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Obituário de Osvaldo Rodrigues da Cunha (1928-2011)

Figura 7. Osvaldo Rodrigues da Cunha em seu 80° aniversário, em 2008, Fotógrafo não identificado. Acervo de Osvaldo Rodrigues da Cunha.

iniciou, o MPEG certamente não seria tão atrativo para

herpetólogos de outras partes do país e do estrangeiro.

Osvaldo Cunha se aposentou aos 62 anos de idade,

mas continuou trabalhando em outra área de seu interesse,

a história do MPEG e dos cientistas que lá trabalharam

ou por lá passaram. Um dos trabalhos mais interessantes

que Cunha elaborou nesse período foi um pequeno livro

(Cunha, 1991) sobre o naturalista Alexandre Rodrigues

Ferreira (1756-1815), que viajou pela Amazônia entre 1783

e 1792. Nessa publicação, Cunha escreveu uma breve

biografia de Rodrigues Ferreira e incluiu informações sobre

outros naturalistas viajantes que estiveram na Amazônia no

século XIX, além de mapas com os percursos percorridos

por cada um deles. Sua intenção foi comparar o percurso

das expedições e demonstrar que a viagem pioneira de

Rodrigues Ferreira criou certo padrão ou estabeleceu

uma referência geográfica para os que vieram depois.

demarcando roteiros e pontos de coleta. Dessa forma, a

publicação constitui uma fonte bastante útil sobre o trabalho

dos naturalistas viajantes que coletaram os primeiros dados

sobre a fauna e a flora da Amazônia.

Infelizmente, a perda da visão impediu Osvaldo Cunha

de finalizar algumas biografias, deixando vários manuscritos

inacabados. Em 2009, surgiu ainda uma publicação de

sua autoria, sobre o botânico jacques Huber (1867-1914),

sucessor de Goeldi na direção do Museu Paraense, que havia

sido anteriormente publicada, em parte, no jornal "Diário do

Pará”, e que foi resgatada e atualizada, com o consentimento

de Cunha, por Nelson Sanjad, editor do Boletim do Museu

Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas. Aliás, Cunha

publicou, entre 1954 e 1988, além dos artigos científicos,

inúmeros textos em jornais de Belém, tanto sobre temas de

zoologia como da história da ciência, indicando a importância

que dava à divulgação do conhecimento.

cm

SciELO

Boi. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat, Belém, v. 6, n, 1, p, 75-87, jan.- abr. 2011

Numa primeira impressão, Cunha parecia uma

pessoa fechada e difícil, mas aqueles que tiveram a

oportunidade de estabelecer um contato um pouco

maior com ele encontraram um homem atento, com

uma memória prodigiosa e que podia conversar horas a

fio sobre assuntos muito diversos, além da herpetologia.

Era também uma pessoa extremamente honesta em suas

opiniões e em seus trabalhos, sendo seus relatos históricos

fontes fidedignas de informação. Em retrospecto, Osvaldo

Cunha foi um desbravador que soube identificar áreas do

conhecimento relevantes para a região, mas até então

negligenciadas, dedicando-se a preencher algumas dessas

lacunas. Com o falecimento de Cunha, o MPEG perdeu

um grande pesquisador e o maior conhecedor da história

da instituição e de seus cientistas.

No dia 11 de abril 2011, durante um tributo a

Osvaldo Rodrigues da Cunha, a coleção herpetológica do

Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi foi renomeada "Coleção

Herpetológica Osvaldo Rodrigues da Cunha" e uma placa

com o novo nome colocada na coleção.

Este obituário foi baseado, primordialmente, na

biografia de Cunha publicada em 1991, por Francisco Paiva do

Nascimento, no Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi,

série Zoologia, 7(1), número dedicado ao pesquisador, assim

como em nossa convivência e nas longas conversas que

tivemos com ele ao longo dos anos. Um de nós (TCSAP)

chegou ao MPEG em 1983, como mestre em Zoologia, mas

sem qualquer experiência com a herpetofauna amazônica.

Passou, então, a trabalhar com Osvaldo Cunha e Francisco

Nascimento, parceria que resultou em três publicações

conjuntas e, mais do que isso, em aprendizado, amizade

e admiração. O primeiro autor (MSH) manteve, a partir

dos anos 1960, correspondência regular com Osvaldo

Cunha sobre a herpetofauna das Guianas e, em 1976, teve

a oportunidade de conhecê-lo pessoalmente durante uma

visita de uma semana às coleções do MPEG. Posteriormente,

quando passou a realizar trabalhos de campo no Brasil

com maior frequência e finalmente mudou-se para cá, o

contato se estreitou. Por sua vez, NS conheceu Cunha em

meados da década de 1990, quando ingressou no MPEG,

tomando sua obra historiográfica como ponto de partida e

inspiração para ampliar os estudos sobre a história da ciência

na Amazônia, particularmente o período de fundação e

reformulação do Museu Paraense, entre 1866 e 1921.

A seguir, apresentamos os taxa descritos por Osvaldo

Rodrigues da Cunha, as homenagens que recebeu e a

obra completa, Esta foi copiada de Nascimento (1991

[vide referência anterior]), com algumas correções e com

a adição das publicações surgidas após 1990.

TAXA DESCRITOS POR OSVALDO RODRIGUES

DA CUNHA (£r AL)

(* indica novo gênero)

REPTILIA, SERPENTES:

Atractus albuquerquei Cunha & Nascimento, 1983

Atractus alphonsehogei Cunha & Nascimento, 1983

Atractus flammigerussnethiagae Cunha & Nascimento, 1983

[= Atractus snethlagae Cunha & Nascimento, 1983]

Uophis carajasensis Cunba, Nascimento & Avila-Pires, 1985

Mastígodryas bifossatus lacerdai Cunha SiNasámento, 1978

[= Mastigodryas b. bifossatus (Raddi, 1820)]

Micrurus psiches [sic^paraensis Cunha & Nascimento, 1973

[= Micrurus paraensis Cunha & Nascimento, 1973]

Oxyrhcpusmelanogen/sorientalis Cunha & Nascimento, 1993

Sibynomorphus mikani [s/c] septentrionalis Cunha,

Nascimento & Hoge, 1980 [= Sibynomorphus mikanii

(Schlegel, 1837)]

REPTILIA. LAGARTOS:

*Amapasaurus tetradactylus Cunha, 1970

Arthrosaura amapaense Cunha, 1967 [= Arthrosaura

reticulata (0’Shaugnessy, 1881)]

Colobosaura landii Cunha, 1977 [= Colobosaura modesta

(Reinhardt & Lütken, 1862)]

*Colobosauroides cearensis Cunha, Lima-Verde & Lima, 1991

Gonatodes eladioi Nascimento, Cunha & Avila-Pires, 1987

Placosoma cipoensis Cunha, 1966

81

cm i

.SciELO

2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Obituário de Osvaldo Rodrigues da Cunha (1928-2011)

REPTILIA, QUELONIO:

Kinosternon scorpioides carajasensis Cunha, 1970

[= Kinosternon s. scorpioides (Linnaeus, 1766)]

INVERTEBRADOS FÓSSEIS;

MoIIusca, Gastropoda

Astrea brasiliensis Ferreira & Cunha, 1957

Cypraea macrovoluta Ferreira & Cunha, 1957

Diodora fortalezensis Ferreira & Cunha, 1957

Diodora siqueirai Ferreira & Cunha, 1957

Simpuium carlotae Ferreira & Cunha [= Cymatium (Septra)

carlotae (Ferreira & Cunha, 1957)]

Strombus goeldii Ferreira & Cunha, 1957

Vasum kraatzi Ferreira & Cunha, 1957

Xancus amazonianum Ferreira & Cunha, 1957 [= Turbinella

amazoniana (Ferreira & Cunha, 1957)]

Xancus mauryae Ferreira & Cunha, 1957 [{=Turbinella

mauryae (Ferreira & Cunha, 1957)]

MoIIusca, Bivalvia

Atrina pirabensis Ferreira & Cunha, 1959

Mytilus vidali Ferreira & Cunha, 1959 [= Mytilus canoasensis

vidali Ferreira & Cunha, 1959]

Modiolus domingosi Ferreira & Cunha, 1959

Divaricella castelensis Ferreira & Cunha, 1959

ESPÉCIES DE RÉPTEIS E ANFÍBIOS NOMEADAS

EM HOMENAGEM A OSVALDO RODRIGUES

DA CUNHA

Amphisbaena cunhai Hoogmoed & Avila-Pires, 1991

Leposoma osvaldoi A\/\\a-P\res, 1995

Typhionectes cunhai Cascon, Lima-Verde & Marques,

1991 [= Typhionectes compressicauda (Duméril &

Bibron, 1841)]

HONRARIAS RECEBIDAS

1978 - Diploma de Honra ao Mérito, Instituto Nacional

de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA).

1986 - Diploma e Medalha de Mérito em Zoologia, Sociedade

Brasileira de Zoologia, durante o Xlll Congresso

Brasileiro de Zoologia, Cuiabá, Mato Grosso.

1986 - Diploma de Pesquisador Emérito do MPEG.

1991 - Grau de Comendador da Ordem do Mérito Grão Fárá.

2007 - Homenagem prestada pela Sociedade Brasileira de

Herpetologia durante o III Congresso Brasileiro de

Herpetologia, Belém, Fárá (Rgura 6).

2009 - Homenagem prestada pela Sociedade Brasileira de

Paleontologia durante o XXI Congresso Brasileiro

de Paleontologia, Belém, Pará.

2011 - Homenagem póstuma renomeando a coleção

herpetológica do Museu Fáraense Emílio Goeldi como

“Coleção Herpetológica Osvaldo Rodrigues da Cunha".

DEDICATÓRIAS EM PUBLICAÇÕES

1979 - Augusto Meira Filho, "Landi, esse desconhecido

(O naturalista)” (p. 21).

1991 - Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, série

Zoologia 7(1), número dedicado a Osvaldo Rodrigues

da Cunha, por ocasião de sua aposentadoria.

1998 - Márcio Martins & M. Ermelinda Oliveira, “Natural

history of snakes in forests of the Manaus region,

central Amazónia, Brazil", Herpetological Natural

History 6: 78-150 (p. 78).

2010 - Nelson Sanjad, ‘A coruja de Minerva: o Museu

Fáraense entre o Império e a República (1866-1907)"

(p.33).

PUBLICAÇÕES DE OSVALDO RODRIGUES

DA CUNHA

AYRES, M., M. M. SAMPAIO, R. M. BARROS, L. B. DIAS & O. R.

CUNHA, 1968. Estudos preliminares sobre o número cromossômico

de quelônios do gênero Podocnemis. Ciência e Cultura 20:174-175.

AYRES, M., M, M. SAMPAIO, R. M. ARROS, L. B. DIAS & O. R.

CUNHA, 1969. A karyological study of turties from the Brazilian

Amazon Region. Cytogenetics 8; 401-409.

BARROS, R. M., M. AYRES, M. M. SAMPAIO, O. R, CUNHA &

M. R ASSIS, 1971. Karyotypes of two subspecies of turties from the

Amazon region of Brazil. Caryologia 25(4); 463-469.

82

cm

SciELO

L2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Boi. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat, Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 75-87, jan.- abr, 2011

BARROS, R. M.; M, M, SAMPAIO, M. F ASSIS, M, AYRES & O.

R. CUNHA, 1975, A karyological study of Geoemyda punctularia

punctularia (Daudin, 1802) from the Amazon region of Brazil

(Chelonia, Emydidae). Acta Amazônica 5(1): 95-96.

BARROS, R. M., M. M. SAMPAIO, M, F ASSIS. M. AYRES & O. R.

CUNHA, 1976. General considerations on the karyotypic evolution of

Chelonia from the Amazon region of Brazil. Cytologia 41: 559-568.

CUNHA, O. R., 1958.1. Lacertilios da Amazônia. Sobre a ocorrência

do gênero Bachia Cray, 1845, na Amazônia brasileira. Boletim do

Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, nova série Zoologia 11: 1-12.

CUNHA, O. R., 1961. 11. Lacertílios da Amazônia. Os lagartos da

Amazônia brasileira, com especial referência aos representados na

coleção do Museu Goeldi. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio

Goeldi, nova série Zoologia 39: 1-189.

CUNHA, O. R., 1966. Sobre uma nova espécie de lagarto do Estado

de Minas Gerais, Placosoma dpoense sp. n. (Lacertilia: Teiidae). Boletim

Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, nova série Zoologia 61: 1-9,

CUNHA, O. R., 1967, Lacertílios da Amazônia, 111. O gênero

"Arthrosaura' Boulenger, 1885. (Lacertilia, Teiidae). In: Atas do

Simpósio sobre a Biota Amazônica: 5 (Zoologia): 141-170. CNPq,

Rio de Janeiro.

CUNHA, O. R,, 1967. Ofídios da Amazônia, I. A ocorrência de

Bothrops bilineatus bilineatus (Wied, 1825) nas matas dos arredores

da cidade de Belém, Pará. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio

Goeldi, nova série Zoologia 66: 1-12.

CUNHA, O. R., 1968. Um teratódimoderódimo em giboia (Constncíor

constrictor constrictor) (Linn., 1766) (Ophidia; Boidae), Boletim do

Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, nova série Zoologia 67:1-17.

CUNHA, O. R,, 1970. Lacertílios da Amazônia. IV Um novo gênero

e espécie de lagarto do Território Federal do Amapá (Lacertilia:

Teiidae). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, nova série

Zoologia 74: 1-8.

CUNHA, O. R,, 1970. Uma nova subespécie de quelônio,

Kinosternon scorpioides carajasensis da Serra dos Carajás, Pará

(Testudinata-Kinosternidae). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio

Goeldi, nova série Zoologia 73: 1-12,

CUNHA, O. R., 1971. Lacertílios da Amazônia, V Sobre Gonatodes

annularis Boulenger e Neusticurus racenisi Roze, no Brasil. (Lacertilia:

Gekkonidae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 31(1): 113-117.

CUNHA, O. R., 1973. Domingos Soares Ferreira Penna. Uma

análise de sua vida e de sua obra. In: O. R. CUNHA (Org,): Obras

completas de Domingos Soares Ferreira Penna: 1:11-41. Conselho

Estadual de Cultura, Belém.

CUNHA, O, R., 1974.108“ Aniversário do Museu Paraense Emílio

Goeldi, síntese de sua história. Revista de Cultura do Pará 4(16-

17): 151-173.

CUNHA, O. R., 1975. Sobre a ocorrência da Tartaruga de couro

Dermochelys cariacea (Linnaeus, 1758) na foz do rio Amazonas

(Chelonia: Dermochelydae). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio

Goeldi, nova série Zoologia 81: 1-16.

CUNHA, O. R., 1976. Estampas de Antônio José Landi. In: A, MEIRA

FILHO (Ed.): Landi esse desconhecido (O naturalista): 193-202.

Conselho Federal de Cultura, Belém.

CUNHA, O. R., 1977. Lacertílios da Amazônia. VI. Uma nova

espécie de lagarto Colobosaura landii da região leste do Pará.

(Lacertilia: Teiidae). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi,

nova série Zoologia 86: 1-13.

CUNHA, O. R., 1981. VII. Lagartos da região nordeste do Território

de Roraima, Brasil. (Lacertilia: Gekkonidae, Scincidae e Teiidae),

Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, nova série Zoologia

107:1-25,

CUNHA, O. R., 1981. Lacertílios da Amazônia. VIII. Sobre

Ophryoessoides tricristatus Duméril, 1851, com redescrição da

espécie e notas sobre a ecologia e distribuição na região leste do

Pará (Lacertilia: Iguanidae). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio

Goeldi, nova série Zoologia 108: 1-23.

CUNHA, O. R., 1983. EmOio Augusto Goeldi (1859-1917), Ciência

e Cultura 35(12): 1965-1972,

CUNHA, O. R., 1986. Histórico do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi.

In: G. M, DE U\ PENHA. S. A. BRUNI & N, PAPAVERO (Eds.):

O Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi: 7-19. Banco Safra, São Paulo.

CUNHA, O. R,, 1989. Talento e atitude: estudos biográficos do

Museu Emílio Goeldi, 1:1-159. MPEG (Coleção Alexandre Rodrigues

Ferreira), Belém.

CUNHA, O, R., 1991. Biografias de Domingos Soares F Penna,

Emílio A. Goeldi e E. Snethlage In: V71NTERS, Christopher (Ed,):

International dictionary of Anthropologists. Garland Pub, New

York.

CUNHA, O. R., 1991. O naturalista Alexandre Rodrigues

Ferreira. Uma análise comparativa de sua Viagem Filosófica (1783-

1793) pela Amazônia e Mato Grosso com a de outros naturalistas

posteriores: 1-88. MPEG (Coleção Alexandre Rodrigues Ferreira),

Belém,

CUNHA, O. R., 2009. Jacques Huber (1867-1914). Boletim do

Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas 4(3): 489-502.

CUNHA, O. R. & T. X. BASTOS, 1973. A contribuição do Museu

Paraense Emílio Goeldi à meteorologia na Amazônia. Publicações

Avulsas do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi 23: 1-42.

CUNHA, O. R., J. S. LIMA-VERDE & A, C. M. LIMA, 1991. Novo

gênero e espécie de lagarto do Estado do Ceará (Lacertilia: Teiidae).

Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, série Zoologia 7(2):

163-176.

83

cm i

,SciELO

2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Obituário de Osvaldo Rodrigues da Cunha (1928-2011)

CUNHA, O. R. & E R NASCIMENTO, 1970. Ofídios da Amazônia.

II. Liophis milians (Linnaeus, 1758) na Amazônia norte oriental

(Território Federal do Amapá). (Ophidia; Colubridae). Boletim

do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeidi, nova série Zoologia 70: 1-6.

CUNHA, O. R. & F R NASCIMENTO, 1972. Ofídios da Amazônia.

III. A ocorrência de Bothrops líchenosus Roze, 1958, no Brasil

(Ophidia: Crotalidae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 32(1): 27.

CUNHA. O. R. & F R NASCIMENTO, 1973. Ofídios da Amazônia.

IV As cobras corais (gênero Micrurus) da região leste do Pará.

(Ophidia: Elapidae) Nota preliminar Publicações Avulsas do Museu

Paraense Emílio Goeidi 20: 273-286.

CUNHA. O. R. & F R NASCIMENTO, 1975. Ofídios da Amazônia.

V Bothrops lichenosus Roze, 1958, sinônimo de Bothrops casteinaudi

Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, com nova descrição e comentários.

Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeidi, nova série Zoologia

80: l-M.

CUNHA. O. R. & F R NASCIMENTO. 1975. Ofídios da Amazônia.

VI. Uotyphbps ternetzii (Boulenger, 1896), ofídio raro e de hábitos

subterrâneos, na região leste do Pará. (Ophidia; Anomalepididae).

Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeidi, nova série Zoologia

82:1-8.

CUNHA. O. R. & F R NASCIMENTO, 1975. Ofídios da Amazônia.

VII. As serpentes peçonhentas do gênero Bothrops (jararaca) e

Lachesis (surucucu) da região leste do Pará. (Ophidia: Viperidae).

Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeidi, nova série Zoologia

83: 1-42.

CUNHA, O. R. & F, R NASCIMENTO, 1976. Ofídios da

Amazônia. VIII. A ocorrência de Rhinobothryum lentiginosum

(Scopoli, 1785) nas proximidades de Belém, Pará. (Ophidia:

Colubridae). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeidi, nova

série Zoologia 84: 1-6.

CUNHA, O, R. & F R NASCIMENTO, 1976, Ofídios da Amazônia.

IX. O gênero Uophis Wagler, 1830, na região leste do Pará. (Ophidia:

Colubridae). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeidi, nova

série Zoologia 85: 1-32.

CUNHA, O. R. & F R NASCIMENTO, 1978. Ofídios da Amazônia.

X. As cobras da região leste do Pará. Publicações Avulsas do Museu

Paraense Emílio Goeidi 32: 1-218.

CUNHA, O. R. & F R NASCIMENTO, 1980, Ofídios da Amazônia.

XI. Ofídios de Roraima e notas sobre Erythrolamprus bauperthuisii

Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1954, sinônimo de Erythrolamprus

aesculapii (Linnaeus, 1758). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio

Goeidi, nova série Zoologia 102: 1-21.

CUNHA, O. R. & F R NASCIMENTO, 1981, Ofídios da Amazônia.

XIII. Observações sobre a viviparidade em ofídios do Pará e

Maranhão. (Ophidia: Aniliidae, Boidae, Colubridae e Viperidae).

Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeidi, nova série Zoologia

109:1-20,

CUNHA, O. R. & F R NASCIMENTO, 1982. Ofídios da Amazônia.

XIV As espécies de Micrurus, Bothrops, Lachesis e Crotalus do sul

do Pará e oeste do Maranhão, incluindo áreas de cerrado desse

Estado. (Ophidia: Elapidae e Viperidae). Boletim do Museu

Paraense Emílio Goeidi, nova série Zoologia 112; 1-58.

CUNHA, O. R. & F. R NASCIMENTO, 1982. Ofídios da

Amazônia. XV As espécies de Chironius da Amazônia oriental

(Pará, Amapá e Maranhão). Memórias do Instituto Butantan

46; 139-172.

CUNHA, O, R. & F R NASCIMENTO, 1982. Ofídios da Amazônia.

XVI. A espécie Uromacerina ricardinii {Peracca, 1897) na Amazônia

oriental (leste do Pará). (Ophidia; Colubridae). Boletim do Museu

Paraense Emílio Goeidi, nova série Zoologia 113: 1-9.

CUNHA, O, R. & F R NASCIMENTO, 1982. Ofídios da Amazônia.

XVII. Re'ra\'\da<;ão de Micrurus ornatissimus \an, 1858) diferenciada

de M. langsdotfi (Wagler, 1824) e distribuição geográfica das duas

espécies (Ophidia: Elapidae). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio

Goeidi, nova série Zoologia 116; 1-19.

CUNHA, O. R. & F R NASCIMENTO, 1982. Ofídios da Amazônia.

X^\\\. O gênero Chironius Fitzinger na Amazónia oriental (Ophidia:

Colubridae). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeidi, nova

série Zoologia 119: 1-17.

CUNHA, O. R. & F R NASCIMENTO. 1983. Ofídios da Amazônia.

XIX. As espécies de Oxyrhopus Wagler, com uma subespécie nova,

ePseudoboa Schneider na Amazônia oriental e Maranhão. (Ophidia:

Colubridae). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeidi, nova

série Zoologia 122: 1-47.

CUNHA, O. R. & F P NASCIMENTO, 1983. Ofídios da Amazônia.

XX. As espécies de Atractus Wagler, 1848, na Amazônia oriental

e Maranhão (Ophidia: Colubridae). Boletim do Museu Paraense

Emílio Goeidi, nova série Zoologia 123: 38.

CUNHA, O, R. & F R NASCIMENTO, 1984. Ofídios da Amazônia.

XXI. Atractus zidoki na região leste do Pará e notas sobre A.

alphonsehogei e A. schach (Ophidia: Colubridae), Boletim do

Museu Paraense Emílio Goeidi, série Zoologia 1(2): 219-228.

CUNHA, O. R. & F R NASCIMENTO, 1991. Ofídios da Amazônia.

XXII. Revalidação e redescrição de Micrurus albicinctus Amaral,

de Rondônia, e sobre a validade de Micrurus waehnerorum Meise,

do Amazonas (Ophidia: Elapidae). Boletim do Museu Paraense

Emílio Goeidi, série Zoologia 7(1): 43-52.

CUNHA, O, R. & F R NASCIMENTO, 1993. Ofídios da Amazônia.

As cobras da região leste do Pará. Boletim do Museu Paraense

Emílio Goeidi, série Zoologia 9(1): 1-191.

CUNHA, O. R., F R NASCIMENTO&A. R. HOGE, 1980, Ofídios

da Amazônia. XII. Uma subespécie de Sibynomorphus mikani [sicl]

do noroeste do Maranhão (Ophidia: Colubridae, Dipsadinae).

Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeidi, nova série Zoologia

103: 1-15.

^ — rvOSJ —^

84

SciELO

Boi. Mus, Para. Emílio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat., Belém. v. 6, n. 1, p. 75-87, jan.- abr. 2011

CUNHA, O. R.. E R NASCIMENTO & T. C. S. AVILA-PIRES,

1985. Os Répteis da área de Carajás. (Testudines e Squamata).

Publicações Avulsas do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Zoologia

40: 1-100.

CUNHA, O. R, & F. C. NOVAES, 1981. Área de vertebrados

do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Herpetologia In: O INPA e

o Museu Goeldi nos 30 anos do CNPq, Acta Amazônica 2(1):

183-187. Suplemento.

CUNHA, O. R., R M. TOLEDO & C, W. MAURITT 1990. História

da pesquisa geológica no Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. In: M.

M, LOPES & S. F. M. FIGUEIRÔA (Orgs.): O conhecimento

geológico na América Latina: Questões de história e teoria: 115-

120. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas.

FERREIRA, C. S. & O. R. CUNHA, 1957. Contribuição à

Paleontologia do Estado do Pãrá. Notas sobre a Formação Pirabas,

com descrição de novos invertebrados fósseis. I - (Mollusca-

Gastropoda). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, nova

série Geologia 2:1-61.

FERREIRA, C. S. & O. R. CUNHA, 1957. Contribuição à

Paleontologia do Estado do Pará. Redescrição e novas ocorrências

do Dentalium paulini Maury, 1924, na área da Formação Pirabas.

11. (Mollusca-Scaphopoda). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio

Goeldi, nova série Geologia 3:1-11.

FERREIRA, C. S. & O. R. CUNHA, 1957. Contribuição à

Paleontologia do Estado do Pará. Novos invertebrados fósseis

e redescrições de mais duas espécies da Formação Pirabas. III.

(Mollusca-Gastropoda). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi,

nova série Geologia 4: 1-33.

FERREIRA, C. S. & O. R. CUNHA, 1959. Contribuição à

Paleontologia do Estado do Pará. Novas contribuições sobre a

Formação Pirabas e descrição de novos invertebrados Fósseis. V

(Mollusca-Pelecypoda). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi,

nova série Geologia 8:1-76.

NASCIMENTO, F. R, T. C. S. AVILA-PIRES & O. R. CUNHA,

1987. Os Répteis da área de Carajás, Pará, Brasil (Squamata).

11. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, série Zoologia

3(1); 1-65.

NASCIMENTO, F R, T C. S, AVILA-PIRES & O. R. CUNHA, 1988.

Répteis Squamata de Rondônia e Mato Grosso, coletados através do

programa POLONOROESTE. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio

Goeldi, série Zoologia 4(1): 21-66.

SAMPAIO, M. M., R. M. BARROS, M. AYRES & O. R. CUNHA,

1969, Contribuição cromossômica de quelônios da região Amazônica

brasileira. II. Estudos preliminares do gênero Geochelone Fitzinger,

1835. Ciência e Cultura 21(2): 276.

SAMPAIO, M. M., R. M. BARROS, M. AYRES, & O, R. CUNHA,

1971. A karyological study of two species of tu rtles from the Amazon

region of Brazil. Cytologia 36(2): 199-204.

TRABALHOS EM JORNAIS DE BELEM OU

SIMILARES

CUNHA, O. R., 1954. Algumas obsen/ações sobre o comportamento

da pipira em seu habitat. O Estado do Pará, 15 jul.

CUNHA, O. R., 1954. A Biblioteca do Museu Paraense. Um templo

da Ciência. O Estado do Pará, 31 out.

CUNHA, O. R., 1954. Biografia da Amazônia. Capítulo 1. O Estado

do Pará, 17 ago.

CUNHA, O. R., 1954. Biografia da Amazônia. Capítulo II. O Estado

do Pará, 22 ago.

CUNHA, O. R.. 1954, Biografia da Amazônia. Capítulo III, O Estado

do Pará, 29 ago.

CUNHA, O. R., 1954. Biografia da Amazônia. Capítulo IV O Estado

do Pará, 5 set.

CUNHA, O. R., 1954. Biografia de Antônio Corrêa de Lacerda, O

Estado do Pará, 19 set.

CUNHA, O. R., 1954. Um Botânico na Amazônia. O Estado do

Pará, 7 nov.

CUNHA, O. R., 1954. 0 cientista solitário. O Estado do Pará, 13jun.

CUNHA, O. R., 1954. O Círio de Nazaré na opinião de alguns

naturalistas. O Estado do Pará, 10 out.

CUNHA, O. R., 1954.0 desastre deVon Martius no rio Amazonas.

O Estado do Pará, 14 out.

CUNHA, O. R., 1954. O fundador da Zoogeografia do Brasil. A

Província do Pará, 25 jul.

CUNHA, O. R., 1954. Os grandes Lacertílios da Amazônia. Capítulo

1. O Estado do Pará, 12 dez.

CUNHA, O. R., 1954. Os grandes Lacertílios da Amazônia. Capítulo

II . O Estado do Pará, 22 dez.

CUNHA, O. R., 1954. Os grandes Lacertílios da Amazônia. Capítulo

III. O Estado do Pará, 28 dez.

CUNHA, O. R., 1954. João Barbosa Rodrigues. Capítulo 1.0 Estado

do Pará, 21 nov.

CUNHA, O. R., 1954. João Barbosa Rodrigues. Capítulo II. O

Estado do Pará, 28 nov.

CUNHA, O. R,, 1954. João Barbosa Rodrigues. Capítulo III. O

Estado do Pará, 5 dez.

CUNHA, O. R., 1954. Leonardo da Vinci como naturalista. O

Estado do Pará, 12 set.

85

cm i

,SciEL0

2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Obituário de Osvaldo Rodrigues da Cunha (1928-2011)

CUNHA, O. R., 1954. Lysenko ou Mendel. O Estado do Pará,

1 ago.

CUNHA, O. R., 1954. Mimetismo em Lepidópteros da Amazônia.

O Estado do Pará, 19 nov.

CUNHA, O. R., 1954. Motivos que impediram Humboldt de visitar

a Amazônia. O Estado do Pará, 26 set.

CUNHA, O. R., 1954. A origem da medicina tropical. Capítulo I.

O Estado do Pará, 19 out.

CUNHA, O. R., 1954. A origem da medicina tropical. Capítulo II.

O Estado do Pará, 24 out. c. 2.

CUNHA, O. R., 1954. O primeiro naturalista na Amazônia. O

Estado do Pará, 8 ago.

CUNHA, O, R., 1954. Um Rei Naturalista. A Província do Pará,

16 maio.

CUNHA, O. R., 1954. A respiração do peixe-boi. O Estado do

Pará, 25 jul.

CUNHA, O. R., 1955. I. Os grandes Lacertílios da Amazônia.

Capítulo IV O Estado do Pará, 24 fev.

CUNHA, O. R., 1955. 1. Os grandes Lacertílios da Amazônia.

Capítulo V O Estado do Pará, 13 mar.

CUNHA, O. R., 1955. I. Os grandes Lacertílios da Amazônia.

Capítulo VI. O Estado do Pará, 23 mar.

CUNHA, O. R., 1955. 1. Os grandes Lacertílios da Amazônia.

Capítulo VII. O Estado do Pará, 8 abr.

CUNHA, O. R., 1955. II. Lacertílios da Amazônia. A Palavra, 1 jan.

CUNHA, O. R., 1955. II. Lacertílios da Amazônia. A Palavra, 27 fev.

CUNHA, O. R., 1955. III. Lacertílios da Amazônia. Sobre a

oviviparidade do lagarto-cobra (Mabuya mabouya mabouya

(Lacépede), 1788. A Palavra, 29 maio.

CUNHA, O. R., 1955. IV Lacertílios da Amazônia. O Estado do

Pará, 17 mar.

CUNHA, O. R., 1955. V Lacertílios da Amazônia. O Estado do

Pará, 29 mar.

CUNHA, O. R., 1955. VI. Lacertílios da Amazônia. O Estado do

Pará, 15 abr.

CUNHA, O. R., 1959. O Museu Paraense e a Geologia do Pará 1.

A Província do Pará, 28 ago.

CUNHA, O. R., 1959. O Museu Paraense e a Geologia do Pará II.

A Província do Pará, 30 ago.

CUNHA, O. R., 1959. O Museu Paraense e a Geologia do Pará III

(Conclusão). A Província do Pará, 1 set.

CUNHA, O. R., 1960. Alexandre Von Humboldt e a Amazônia. A

Província do Pará, 6 mar.

CUNHA, O. R., 1960. Antônio Corrêa de Lacerda. A Província

do Pará, 31 jan.

CUNHA, O. R,, 1961. Esboço biográfico de um cientista - Walter

Egler. A Província do Pará, 17 set.

CUNHA, O. R., 1965. O Centenário do Museu Paraense 1. As

origens. A Província do Pará, 17 out.

CUNHA, O. R., 1965, O Centenário do Museu Paraense "Emílio

Goeldi" II. Os fundamentos e evolução histórica, A Província do

Pará, 20 out.

CUNHA, O. R., 1965.0 centenário do Museu Fáraense “EmOio Goeldi"

III. Ainda o museu de 1866 a 1871. A Província do Pará, 24 out.

CUNHA, O. R., 1965. O centenário do Museu Paraense "Emílio

Goeldi” IV O Museu de 1871 a 1891. A Província do Pará, 31 out,

CUNHA, O. R., 1965. O centenário do Museu Paraense "Emílio

Goeldi" V Ainda o Museu de 1871 a 1881 [1891]. A Província do

Pará, 7 nov.

CUNHA, O. R., 1965. O centenário do Museu Paraense "Emílio

Goeldi" VI. O Museu de 1871 a 1891 (continuação). A Província

do Pará. 14 nov.

CUNHA, O. R., 1965. O centenário do Museu Paraense "Emílio

Goeldi" Vlll [VII]. O Museu de 1871 a 1891 (continuação). A Província

do Pará, 21 nov.

CUNHA, O. R., 1965. O centenário do Museu Paraense "Emílio

Goeldi" Vlll. O Museu de 1871 a 1891. A Província do Pará, 28 nov.

CUNHA, O. R., 1965. O centenário do Museu Paraense "Emílio

Goeldi" IX. O Museu de 1871 a 1891 (continuação). A Província

do Pará, 5 dez.

CUNHA, O. R., 1965. O centenário do Museu Paraense "Emílio

Goeldi". A Província do Pará, 12 dez.

CUNHA, O. R., 1966. Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi; Um século

de História e Ciência I. A Província do Pará, 6 out.

CUNHA, O. R., 1966. Museu Paraense EmOio Goeldi: Um século

de História e Ciência II. A Província do Pará, 16 out.

CUNHA, O. R., 1966. Museu Paraense EmOio Goeldi: Um século

de História e Ciência 3. A Província do Pará, 17 out,

CUNHA, O. R., 1966. Museu Paraense EmOio Goeldi: Um século

de História e Ciência 4. A Província do Pará, 6 nov.

86

cm

SciELO

L2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Boi. Mus. Para. EmOio Goeldi. Cienc. Nat., Belém, v. 6, n. 1, p. 75-87, jan.- abr, 2011

CUNHA, O. R., 1967, Augusto Montenegro e o Museu Paraense.

A Província do Pará, 18 jul.

CUNHA, O. R., 1967. Centenário da abertura do rio Amazonas

(1867-1967). A Província do Pará, 21 maio,

CUNHA, O. R., 1969. O Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi e a

Atualidade da Amazônica. A Província do Pará, 28 e 29 set.

CUNHA, O. R., 1972. O Museu e a febre amarela. O Liberal: 2,

11 ago.

CUNHA, O. R., 1974. 108° aniversário do Museu Paraense Emílio

Goeldi. A Província do Pará, 13 out.

CUNHA, O. R., 1974.108° aniversário do Museu Paraense Emílio

Goeldi. Correio Braziliense, Brasília, 18 out.

CUNHA, O, R,, 1974. 108° aniversário do Museu Paraense Emfiio

Goeldi. O Diário do Congresso Nacional, Brasília, out.

CUNHA, O, R,, 1976. A criação do Pirarucu nos lagos do Museu.

O Liberal, 24 maio.

CUNHA, O. R., 1978. Pesquisas herpetológicas no Museu Paraense

Emílio Goeldi, A Província do Pará, 16 abr. Caderno 2: 6.

CUNHA, O, R., 1984. Viagem Filosófica pelas capitanias do Grão-

Pará, Rio Negro, Mato Grosso e Cuiabá (1783/1793). Bicentenário da

chegada a Belém de Alexandre Rodrigues Ferreira. O Liberal, 15 nov.

CUNHA, O. R., 1985. Maria Emília Snethlage (1868-1929): a

primeira mulher cientista na Amazônia. O Liberal, 15 nov.

CUNHA. O. R., 1986. Domingos Soares Ferreira Penna (1818-1888).

O Liberal, 29 set.

CUNHA, O. R., 1986. O edifício central do Museu (Pavilhão

Domingos S. Ferreira Penna, 1879). O Liberal: 42, 22 set.

CUNHA, O. R., 1986. Emílio Augusto Goeldi (1859-1917). O

Liberal, 29 nov.

CUNHA, O. R., 1988. Centenário da morte de Domingos S. Ferreira

Penna. O Liberal, 10 jan.

CUNHA, O. R., 1988. O criador do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi.

O Liberal, 22 jan.

CUNHA, O. R., 1988.0 Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. O Diploma

outorgado pelo Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Histórico. O Diário

do Pará, 5 maio. Caderno de cultura: B6-B7,

CUNHA, O. R., 1988. Dr. Jacques Huber (1867-1914); o grande

diretor do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Capítulo I. O Diário do

Pará. 28 jul. Caderno de cultura.

CUNHA, O. R., 1988. Dr. jacques Huber (1867-1914): o grande

diretor do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Capítulo II. O Diário do

Pará, Belém, 4 ago. Caderno de cultura.

CUNHA, O. R. &A. MEIRA FILHO, 1970, Landi, esse desconhecido.

Capítulo I. A Província do Pará, 3 dez.

CUNHA, O. R. &A. MEIRA FILHO, 1970. Landi, esse desconhecido.

Capítulo II. A Província do Pará. 20 out.

CUNHA, O. R. &A. MEIRA FILHO, 1970. Landi, esse desconhecido.

Capítulo III. A Província do Pará, 20 out.

CUNHA, O. R. &A. MEIRA FILHO, 1970. Landi, esse desconhecido.

Capítulo IV A Província do Pará, 3 jan.

CUNHA, O. R. & A. MEIRA FILHO, 1971. Landi, esse desconhecido.

Capítulo V, A Província do Pará, 28 mar.

OUTRAS PUBLICAÇÕES

CUNHA, O. R., 2009. Apresentação. In: M. 1. F RAMOS, H. M. M,

SANTOS, S. A. R, F COSTA & R M. TOLEDO (Eds,): Catálogo de

Fósseis: Coleção Paleontológica do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi.

Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Belém.

AGRADECIMENTOS

Os autores agradecem a Ligia Maria da Cunha Barbosa pelo

acesso aos desenhos e às fotografias de Osvaldo Rodrigues

da Cunha, bem como pela autorização para publicá-los.

87

cm i

,SciELO

2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

BOLETIM DO MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDI. CIÊNCIAS NATURAIS

INSTRUÇÕES AOS AUTORES

Objetivos e política editorial

O primeiro número do BOLETIM DO MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDI data de 1894. Atualmente, é editado em duas versões,

Ciências Naturais e Ciências Humanas, publicadas três vezes ao ano.

O BOLETIM DO MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDI. CIÊNCIAS NATURAIS tem como missão publicartrabalhos originais na área de

Biologia (Zoologia, Botânica, Biogeografia, Ecologia, Taxonomia, Anatomia, Biodiversidade, Vegetação, Conservação da natureza) e Geologia.

O BOLETIM DO MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDI aceita colaborações em português, espanhol e Inglês (Inglaterra) para as

seguintes seções:

Artigos Científicos - textos analíticos originais, resultantes de estudos e pesquisas com contribuição efetiva para o avanço do

conhecimento. Até 50 laudas de texto.

Notas de Pesquisa - relato preliminar sobre observações de campo, dificuldades e progressos de pesquisa em andamento, ou em

fase inicial, enfatizando hipóteses, comentando fontes, resultados pardais, métodos e técnicas utilizados. Até 15 laudas de texto.

Memória - seção que se destina à divulgação de acervos ou seus componentes que tenham relevância para a pesquisa científica;

de documentos transcritos parcial ou integralmente, acompanhados de texto introdutório; e de ensaios biográficos, incluindo

obituário ou memórias pessoais. Até 15 laudas de texto.

Resenhas Bibliográficas - texto descritivo e/ou crítico de obras publicadas na forma impressa ou eletrônica. Até cinco laudas de texto.

Teses e Dissertações - descrição sucinta, sem bibliografia, de dissertações de mestrado, teses de doutorado e livre-docência.

Até uma lauda de texto.

Apresentação de originais

Os originais devem ser encaminhados ao Editor Científico do BOLETIM DO MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDI, por meio de carta

contendo, obrigatoriamente, o título do trabalho, o nome completo, por extenso, do autor principal e dos demais autores, a indicação de autor

para correspondência (com endereço completo, CEP telefones, fax, e-mail) e a assinatura de todos os autores ou termo de compromisso do

autor principal, responsabilizando-se pela inclusão dos coautores.

O BOLETIM DO MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDI possui um Conselho Científico. Os trabalhos submetidos são primeiramente

avaliados pelo Editor Científico ou por um dos Editores Associados. O Editor Científico reserva-se o direito de sugerir alterações

nos trabalhos recebidos ou devolvê-los, caso não estejam de acordo com os critérios exigidos para publicação ou dentro do escopo

editorial do periódico.

Uma vez aceitos para entrar no processo editorial, os artigos seguem para avaliação dos pares (peer-review). Os artigos são analisados

por dois especialistas que não integram a Comissão Editorial. Caso haja discordância entre os pareceres, o trabalho é submetido a um

terceiro especialista. Caso mudanças ou correções sejam recomendadas, o trabalho é devolvido ao(s) autor(es), que terão um prazo de

trinta dias para elaborar nova versão. Artigos não aprovados para publicação são devolvidos aos autores.

A publicação implica a cessão integral dos direitos autorais do trabalho ao BOLETIM DO MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDI. O

termo de responsabilidade e transferência de direitos autorais é enviado juntamente com a notificação de aprovação do artigo e deve ser

devolvido assinado por todos os autores.

cm

2 3

z

5 6 7

8

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Preparação de originais

Os originais devem ser enviados com texto digitado em programas compatíveis com o ambiente Windows, em CD ou anexado a mensagens

eletrônicas para boletim.naturais@museu-goeldi.br.

O texto deve ser digitado no Word for Windows, com fonte Times New Roman, tamanho 12, entrelinha 1.5, em laudas sequencialmente numeradas.

Solicita-se o envio, junto com o arquivo digitado, de três cópias impressas com folha de rosto, na qual devem constar: título (no idioma do texto e

em inglês); nome(s) completo{s) do(s) autor(es); instituição a que pertence(m), por extenso; endereço(s) completo(s); e-mail de todos os autores.

Na página dois devem constar: título (no idioma do texto e em inglês), resumo, abstract, palavras-chave e keywords. Não incluir o(s)

nome(s) do(s) autor(es).

Pede-se que o(s) autor(es) destaque(m) termos ou expressões no texto por meio de aspas simples, em lugar de itálico ou negrito. Citações,

epígrafes e termos em língua estrangeira por meio de aspas duplas. Só termos científicos latinizados e nomes científicos devem constar em itálico.

Quadros e Tabelas devem ser em formato de texto, sequencialmente numeradas, com claro enunciado e referência no texto.

Chaves devem ser apresentadas no seguinte formato:

1. Lagarto com 4 patas minúsculas.2

Lagarto com 4 patas bem desenvolvidas.3

2. Dígitos geralmente sem unhas, dorsais lisas. Bachía flavescens

Dígitos com unhas, dorsais quilhadas. Bachia panóplia

3. Mãos com apenas 4 dedos.4

Mãos com 5 dedos.5

4. Escamas dorsais lisas. Gymnophthalmus undenvoodii

Escamas dorsais quilhadas. Amapasaurus teradactylus

5. Cabeça com grandes placas.6

Cabeça com escamas pequenas.7

6. Placas posteriores da cabeça formam uma linha redonda. Alopoglossus angulatus

Placas posteriores da cabeça formam uma linha reta. Anhrosaura kockii

1. Etc.

Etc.

As ilustrações e gráficos devem ser apresentados em páginas separadas e numeradas, com as respectivas legendas, e em arquivos à parte. Imagens

digitalizadas devem ter resolução mínima de 300 dpi, em formato TIFF (preferencialmente) ou JPEG. Imagens em preto-e-branco devem ser

escaneadas em tons de cinza. O Boletim publica apenas fotografias em preto-e-branco, mas fotografias coloridas podem ser publicadas desde que o

autor se responsabilize pelos custos adicionais de impressão. O texto deve, obrigatoriamente, fazer referência a todas as tabelas, gráficos e ilustrações.

Obsenar cuidadosamerte as regras de nomenclatura zoológica e botânica, assim como abreviaturas e convenções adotadas em disciplinas especializadas.

Notas de rodapé devem ser utilizadas apenas quando imprescindíveis, nunca bibliográficas, numeradas em algarismos arábicos.

Citações e referências a autores no decorrer do texto devem subordinar-se à seguinte forma: utilizar o sistema de remissão autor-data no texto,

sobrenome do autor (apenas com inicial maiúscula), vírgula, data (ano) e, eventualmente, vírgula e número da página. Em trabalhos com dois

autores, os nomes devem ser separados por “&". No caso de mais de dois autores, menciona-se somente o nome do primeiro autor seguido

por “et a/." e ano. Tòdas as menções citadas ao longo do texto devem estar corretamente descritas e listadas ao final do artigo, com todos os

dados pertinentes às citações (veja exemplos a seguir).

São de responsabilidade do(s) autor(es): o conteúdo científico do trabalho; a tradução do título para o inglês (quando este não for o idioma do

texto); o abstract e keywords.

cm

SciELO

L2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Estrutura básica dos trabalhos para artigos originais

Título - No idioma do texto e em inglês (quando este não for o idioma do texto). Deve ser escrito em caixa baixa, em negrito, centralizado,

e deve ser citado da mesma maneira na página de rosto e na página dois.

Resumo e Abstract - Texto em um único parágrafo, ressaltando os objetivos, métodos e conclusões do trabalho, com, no máximo,

duzentas palavras, no idioma do texto (Resumo) e em inglês (Abstract). A versão para o inglês é de responsabilidade do(s) autor(es).

Palavras-chave e Keywords - Três a seis palavras que identifiquem os temas do trabalho, para fins de indexação em bases de dados

(convém consultar descritores específicos da respectiva área de conhecimento).

Introdução - Deve conter uma visão clara e concisa de conhecimentos atualizados sobre o tema do artigo, oferecendo citações pertinentes

e declarando o objetivo do estudo.

Material e métodos - Exposição clara dos métodos e procedimentos de pesquisa e de análise de dados. Técnicas já publicadas devem

ser apenas citadas e não descritas. Termos científicos, incluindo espécies animais e vegetais, devem ser indicados de maneira correta e

completa (nome, autor e ano de descrição).

Resultados e discussão - Podem ser comparativos ou analíticos, ou enfatizar novos e importantes aspectos do estudo. Podem ser

apresentados em um mesmo item ou em separado, em sequência lógica no texto, usando tabelas, gráficos e figuras, dependendo da

estrutura do trabalho.

Conclusão - Deve ser clara, concisa e responder aos objetivos do estudo.

Agradecimentos - Devem ser sucintos: créditos de financiamento; vinculação do artigo a programas de pós-graduação e/ou projetos de

pesquisa; agradecimentos pessoais e institucionais. Nomes de instituições devem ser por extenso, de pessoas pelas iniciais e sobrenome,

explicando o motivo do agradecimento.

Referências - Devem ser listadas ao final do trabalho, em ordem alfabética, de acordo com o sobrenome do primeiro autor. No caso

de mais de uma referência de um mesmo autor, usar ordem cronológica, do trabalho mais antigo ao mais recente. Nomes de periódicos

devem ser por extenso. Teses e dissertações acadêmicas devem estar publicadas. Conforme os modelos a seguir;

Livro

WEAVER, C. E., 1989. Clays, Muds and Shales; 1-819. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Capítulo de livro

ARANHA, L, G., H. R LIMA, R. K. MAKINO & j. M. SOUZA, 1990. Origem e evolução das bacias de Bragança - Viseu, S.

Luís e Ilha Nova. In; E. J. MILANl & G. R RAHA GABAGUIA (Eds.): Origem e evolução das bacias sedimentares; 221-234.

PETROBRÁS, Rio de janeiro.

Artigo de periódico

GANS, C., 1974. New records of small amphisbaenians from northern South America. Journal of Herpetology 8(3); 273-276.

Série/Coleção

CAMARGO, C. E. D., 1987. Mandioca, o “pão caboclo”: de alimento a combustível: 1 - 66. ICONE (Coleção Brasil Agrícola), São Pãulo.

Tese acadêmica

KUNIYOSHI, Y S., 1983. Morfologia da semente e da germinação de 25 espécies arbóreas de uma floresta com araucária:

1-232. Dissertação (Mestrado em Botânica) - Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba.

Documento eletrônico

IBGE, 2004. Fundação Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Disponível em: <http/Avww.ibge. gov.br/home/estatistica/

indicadores/agropecuaria/lspa/defaut.shtm>. Acesso em: 23 janeiro 2004.

Provas

Os trabalhos, depois de formatados, são encaminhados em PDF para a revisão final dos autores, que devem devolvê-los em dez dias. A

Editora deve ser informada por escrito sobre possíveis alterações ou sobre a aprovação final de cada trabalho. Nessa etapa não serão aceitas

modificações no conteúdo do trabalho ou que impliquem alterações no número de páginas. Caso o autor não responda ao prazo, o trabalho

será publicado conforme a última versão autorizada.

Cada autor recebe dois exemplares do Boletim impresso. Não são fornecidas separatas. Os artigos são divulgados integralmente no formato

PDF no endereço eletrônico da revista: http:/AAAAw.museu-goeldi. br/editora e http:/Avww.portalperiodicos.iec.pa.gov.br.

Endereço para correspondência:

Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi

Editor do Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Naturais

Av. Magalhães Barata, 376

SãoBraz-CEP 66040-170

Belém - PA - Brasil

Caixa Postal 399

Telefone: 55-91-3182-3246

Fax: 55-91-3249-6373

E-mail: boletim.naturais@museu-goeldi.br

Lembre-se;

1- Antes de enviar seu trabalho ao Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, verifique se foram cumpridas as normas acima. Disso

depende o início do processo editorial.

2- Após a aprovação, o trabalho será publicado por ordem de chegada. O Editor Científico também pode determinar o momento mais oportuno.

3- É de responsabilidade do(s) autor(es) o conteúdo científico do artigo, o cuidado com o idioma em que ele foi concebido, bem como

a coerência da versão para o inglês do título, do resumo (abstract) e das palavras-chave (keywords). Quando o idioma não estiver

corretamente utilizado, o trabalho pode ser recusado.

cm

SciELO

L2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

BOLETIM DO MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDl. CIÊNCIAS NATURAIS

INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS

Goals and editorial policy

The first number of the BOLETIM DO MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDl appeared in 1894. Currently, the Bulletin is published on

a quarterly basis and in two versions: Natural Sciences and Human Sciences.

The mission of the BOLETIM DO MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDl. CIÊNCIAS NATURAIS is to publish original works in

the fields of Biology (Zoology, Botany, Biogeography, Ecology, Taxonomy, Anatomy, Biodiversity, Vegetation, Nature Conservation)

and Geology.

The BOLETIM DO MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDl accepts contributions in Portuguese, Spanish, and English (UK) for the

following sections:

Articles - Scientific and original analytical papers stemming from studies and research, which effectively contribute to building

knowledge in the field. Maximum length: 50 pages.

Short Communications - Short preliminary reports on field observations, challenges faced and progress made in on-going

research emphasizing hypotheses, mentioning sources, partial results, materiais and methods. Maximum length; 15 pages.

Memory - This section includes texts on collections or items of collections considered relevant for scientific research; documents

transcribed in whole or in part submitted with an introductory text; and biographical essays, including obituaries or individual

memories. Maximum length: 15 pages.

Book Reviews - Descriptive and/or criticai reviews of publications released in print or electronically. Maximum length: 5 pages.

Thesis and Dissertations - Thesis and dissertations abstracts, with no references section. Maximum length: 1 page.

Submitting a manuscript

Manuscripts are to be sent to the Scientific Editor of the BOLETIM DO MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDl, with a cover letter

containing: title, full name (no abbreviations) of the main author and other authors, mailing address (complete address, zip code, phone

number, fax, e-mail), and signature of all the authors or a document stating that the main author is responsible for the inclusion of the

co-authors.

The BOLETIM DO MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDl has a Scientific Board. Manuscripts are first examined by the Scientific Editor

or by one of the Associated Editors. The Scientific Editor has the right to recommend alterations be made to the papers submitted or to

return them when they fail to comply with the Bulletin's editorial policy.

If accepted to enter the editorial process, manuscripts are submitted to peer-review and are reviewed by two specialists who are not

members of the Editorial Commission. In the event of disagreement, the manuscript is submitted to a third referee. If changes or corrections

need to be made, the manuscript is returned to the authors who have thirty days to submit a new version, Manuscripts not accepted for

publication will be returned to the author(s).

Publication means fully assigning and transferring all copyrights of the manuscript to the BOLETIM DO MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO

GOELDl. The Liability Statement and Assignment of Copyrights will be enclosed with the notice of acceptance, and must be signed by

all authors and returned.

cm

2 3

z

5 6 7

8

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Preparing manuscripts

The manuscripts must aiso be sent in Windows-compatible formats on floppy disks, CDs or as email attachments sentto boletim.naturais©

museu-goeldi.br.

The text must be sent in Word for Windows format, in Times New Roman, font 12,1.5 spacing between lines, and pages must be sequentially

numbered. In addition, submitters have to send three hard copies with a cover page containing the following Information: title (in the

original language and in English); full name of the author(s); affiliation (no abbreviations); complete address(es); and e-mail(s) for all authors.

Page two must include: title, abstract, and keywords (in the original language and in English). Do not mention the name(s) of the author(s).

To highlight terms or phrases, please use single quotation marks, not italics or bold. Quotations, epigraphs, foreign language words and

phrases should be indicated by double quotation marks. Only latinized scientific terms and scientific names should be in italics.

Tables should be in text format, numbered in sequence, mentioned in the body of the text and should have clear captions.

Keys have to be presented in the following format:

1. Lizard with 4 small limbs .2

Lizard with 4 well developed limbs.3

2. Fingers and toes generally without nails, dorsais smooth . Bachia flavescens

Fingers and toes with nails, dorsais keeled. Bachia panóplia

3. Hands with only 4 fingers.4

Hands with 5 fingers.5

4. Dorsal scales smooth. Gymnophthaimus underwoodii

Dorsal scales keeled. Amapasaurus teradactylus

5. F-lead with large scales.6

Head with small scales...7

6. Posterior scales of head forming arounded line. Alopoglossus angulatus

Posterior scales of head forming a straight line. Anhrosaura koctíi

7. Etc.

Etc.

Any images or graphs should be on separate and numbered pages, with their respective captions. They should also be sent in separate

files. Digital images should have a minimum resolution of 300 dpi, and be in TIFF (preferably) or JPEG format. Black and white pictures

must be in gray scale. The Bulletin is printed in black and white. F-lowever, images in color can also be included provided that authors bear

the additional printing costs. All tables, graphs and images must be mentioned in the body of the text.

Texts must fully comply with zoological and botanical nomenclature conventions, in addition to respecting the abbreviations and conventions

adopted in the respective fields.

Footnotes are only to be used when strictly necessary, never for references, and are to be indicated with Arabic numbers.

To quote or mention authors throughout the text, please use the following format: use the author/date system in the text, author's

last name (only flrst letter capital), comma, year and (eventually) comma and page. Publications with two authors are cited with an

between the names. In cases where there are more than two authors only the name of the first author is mentioned followed

by "et al." and year. All quotations in the body of the text must be accurate and listed at the end of the paper, together with all

relevant bibliographic Information (see examples below).

The author(s) is(are) fully liable for: scientific content; the English translation of the title (when English is not the language of the text), the

abstract and keywords.

cm

SciELO

L2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Basic text structure of scientific papers

Title - The title must appear both in the original language of the text and in English (when English is not the original language). Title must

be centralized and in bold. Do not use capitais. The title must be written the same way on the cover page and on page two.

Abstract -This section should be one paragraph long and highlightthe goals, methods, and results of the study. Maximum length: 200 words.

The abstract should be presented both in the original language of the text and in English. The authors are responsible for the English translation.

Keywords - Three to six words that identify the topics addressed, for the purpose of indexing the paper in databases (please verify the

specific descriptors of the respective scientific field).

Introduction - The introduction should contain a clear and concise description based on state-of-the-art knowledge on the topic addressed.

It should provide relevant quotations, and express the goals of the study clearly.

Materials and Methods - This section contains clear Information on methods, procedures and data analysis. Previously published studies

should not be described, only mentioned. Scientific terms, including the names of plants and animais, should be provided correctly and

accurately (name, author, year of description).

Results and Discussion - The results and discussion can be comparative or analytical, or emphasize new and important aspects of the

study. They can be addressed together under the same topic, or separately according to the logical order of the paper by using tables,

graphics and pictures depending on the structure of the text.

Conclusion - The conclusion should be clear and concise, and should mirror the goals of the study.

Acknowledgements - Acknowledgements are brief and can mention: support and funding; connections to graduate programs and/

or research projects; acknowledgement to individuais and institutions. The names of institutions should be written in full, those of

individuais with initials and family name, indicating what motivated the acknowledgement.

References - References should appear at the end of the text in alphabetical order according to the last name of the first author. In the

event of two or more references to the same author, please use chronological order starting with the earliest work. In case here are

several publications by the same author in the same year, use lower case letters behind the year to differentiate them. Thesis and academic

dissertations must have been published. References should followthe examples below:

Book

WEAVER, C. E., 1989. Clays, Muds and Shales: 1-819. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Chapter in book

ARANHA, L. G., H. RUMA, R. K. MAKINO&J. M. SOUZA, 1990. Origem e evolução das bacias de Bragança-Viseu, S. Luís e Ilha Nova.

In: E. J. MILANI & G. R RAJA GABAGLIA (Eds.): Origem e evolução das bacias sedimentares: 221-234. PETROBRÁS, Rio de Janeiro.

Article in journal

GANS, C., 1974. New records of small amphisbaenians from northern South America. Journal of Herpetology 8(3): 273-276.

Series/Collection

CAMARGO, C. E. D., 1987, Mandioca, o “pão caboclo”: de alimento a combustível: 1-66. Icone (Coleção Brasil Agrícola), São Paulo.

Academic thesis

KUNIYOSHI, Y, S., 1983. Morfologia da semente e da germinação de 25 espécies arbóreas de uma floresta com araucária:

1-232. Dissertation (Mestrado in Botany) - Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba.

Electronic document

IBGE, 2004. Fundação Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Disponible in: <http//www.ibge. gov.br/home/estatistica/

indicadores/agropecuaria/lspa/defaut.shtm>. Accessed on: 23 january 2004.

cm i

,SciEL0

2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Proofs

After the text-formatting phase, authors will receive their paper in PDF format for final approval. Authors must retum the file in ten days informing

the Edrtors in wrrting of any changes in the text and/or approval issues. At this stage, changes conceming content or changes resulting in an increase

or decrease in the number of pages will not be accepted. In the event the author does not meet the 10-day deadline, the paper will be published

according to the last version approved by the author.

Each author will receive two printed copies of the Bulletin. Reprints will not be made. The papers will be disclosed in full, in PDF format

in ourwebsite: http://www.museu-goeldi.br/editoraand http://www.portalperiodicos.iec.pa.gov.br.

Mailing address:

Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi

Editor do Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Naturais

Av. Magalhães Barata, 376

SâoBraz-CEP 66040-170

Belém - PA - Brazil

Caixa Postal 399

Phone: 55-91-3182-3246

Fax: 55- 91-3249-6373

E-mail: boletim.naturais@museu-goeldi.br

Please note:

1- Before submitting your manuscript to the Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, please check whether you have complied with

the norms above. For the editorial process to begin, submitters must comply with the policy.

2- After acceptance, the papers will be published according to order of arrival. The Scientific Editor may aiso decide on the most convenient

time for publication.

3- The authors are fully responsible for the scientific content of their manuscripts, language quality, in addition to accuracy between the

original and the English version of the titie, abstract and keywords. When language is not correct a manuscript can be refused.

cm

SciELO

L2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Revista

PAN-AMAZONICA

D E S A [1 D F E)igiiBifg|[g|[BiOfg)ig)

O novo periódico médico-científico da Amazônia!

Lançada em janeiro de 2010, a Revista Pan-Amazônico de Saúde

(RPAS) é editada sob a responsabilidade do Instituto Evandro Chagos

(lEC), órgão do Ministério do Soúde, vinculado ò Secretaria de

Vigilância em Saúde. Conheça algumas características:

• Possui periodicidade trimestral;

• Publica pesquisas nos campos epidemiológico, entomológico,

ecológico, antropológico, sócio-econômico, dos imunobiológicos e

do meio ambiente;

• Não obstante o seu enfoque primário pon-omazônico,

comporta publicações em âmbito nacional e internacional;

• Aceita contribuições em português, inglês e espanhol;

• Conta com os seguintes modalidades de trabalhos científicos:

artigos originois, artigos históricos, artigos de revisão, notas

técnicas, relatos de caso, comunicoçóo, resumos de teses e

dissertações e cortas ao editor;

• Dispõe de sistema de submissõo eletrônico de artigos;

• Além da versõo impressa - distribuído gratuitamente a

instituições de ensino e pesquisa do pois e do exterior -, conta

com a versão eletrônica (metodologia SciELO);

• No formato eletrônico, publica seus ortigos inteiramente em

português, inglês e espanhol, contando com um corpo de

profissionais experientes paro realizar revisão/tradução, como,

por exemplo, 0 American Journal Experts (AJ E);

• Permite, no versõo eletrônico, a inclusõo de material

suplementar - como áudio, vídeo, slide e outros;

• Atribui um número de identificação digital (Digital Object

Identifier- DOI) o todos os artigos publicados, o que facilita a

localizaçõo e o acesso na Internet;

• Disponibiliza artigos no prelo (oheoéofprintj.

Teremos imensa satisfação e honra em considerar para publicação no

RPAS uma contribuição sua, da sua equipe ou instituição.

Consulte os Instruções para publicação no site da Revista:

http://revista.iec.pa.gov.br

Os manuscritos podem ser enviados pelo Sistema de Submissão e

Acompanhamento On-line, no endereço acima, ou por correio para:

Revista Pan-Amazônica de Soúde

Instituto Evandro Chagas/SVS/MS

Centro de Documentação, Informação eMemória

Rodovia BR-316 km 7 s^n. Levilôndia - 67030-000

Ananindeua/Pará/Brasil

Para maiores informações, entre em contato:

E-mail: revista@iec.pQ.aov.br

Tel.: -f 55(91)3214-2185 j Fax: -f 55(91)3214-2186

Aguardomos suo contribuição!

roé's^:A

r

CLiCJ

O E) fSJ O ími fmj íej rJ

S«cretaría de

Vigilância em Saúde

Ministério

da Saúde

(SciELO^

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

ScíELOl'2

2

3

5

6

7

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

L.

cm

BIODIVERSIDADE E ECOLOGIA NO PERIODICO

CIENTÍFICO MAIS ANTIGO DA AMAZÔNIA

2 MUSfU PAnMH-it EMtLK> OOCLOI

§CIÊNCIAS

i âNATURAIS

A

A.' IhtfUO «IOSU>l

CIÊNCIAS

INATURAIS '

: j

5 MKAtUSÍ r MU (O GOf 1 Dl

§CIÊNCIAS

SNATURAIS

J, J.«!HSiÍ"V'Í .-v

P<)lf n de Polygnki fpMáhiln DC

BOLETIM DO MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDI. CIÊNCIAS NATURAIS

(ISSN 1981-8114)

Publica trabalhos originais (em português, inglês e espanhol) nas áreas de

Biologia (zoologia, botânica, biogeografia, ecologia, taxonomia, anatomia,

biodiversidade, vegetação, conservação da natureza)

e Geologia (estratigrafia e paleontologia).

Acesse a versão online em

http://www.museu-goeldi.br/editora

http://www.portalperiodicos.iec.pa.gov.br

Submissão de trabalhos e informações, escreva para boletim.naturais@museu-goeldi.br

MUSEU PARAENSE EMIl lO GOEEUl

Ministério da

Ciência e Tecnologia

i

cm i

(SciELO^

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Boletim do Museu Paraense EmOio Goeldi

Formato: 50P0 x 59P6

Tipografia: MPEG

Papel: ofT-set 90 g/m^

Tragem: 1.000 exemplares

Gráfica RR Donnelley

9

SciELO

13 1

Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi

Formato: 50P0 x 59P6

Tipografia: MPEG

Papel: ofT-set 90 g/m^

Tragem: 1,000 exemplares

Gráfica RR Donnelley

SciELO

9

13

r-Conteúdo

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: a forgotten part of the Guianan

Region, II. Avifauna

Notas sobre os vertebrados do norte do Pará, Brasil: uma parte esquecida da Região

das Guianas, II. Avifauna

Alexandre Aleixo, Fabíola Poletto, Maria de Fátima Cunha Lima, Marcelo Castro, Eduardo Portes,

Leonardo de Sousa Miranda. 11

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: a forgotten part of the Guianan

Region, III. A new species of Microcaedlia (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Caeciliidae)

Notas sobre os vertebrados do norte do Pará, Brasil: uma parte esquecida da Região

das Guianas, III. Uma nova espécie àe Microcaedlia (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Caeciliidae)

Adriano Oliveira Maciel. Marinus Steven Hoogmoed.67

Obituário de Osvaldo Rodrigues da Cunha (1928-2011)

Marinus Steven Hoogmoed, Teresa Cristina Sauer de Avila-Pires, Nelson Sanjad.75

Coleção Notas sobre os vertebrados do norte do Pará, Brasil: uma parte esquecida da Região das Guianas

Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: a forgotten part of the Guianan Region

MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO 00111.1)1

Ministério da

Ciência e Tecnologia

OOVIRNO FIOIRAL

PAIS RICO t PAIS SEM POBREZA

SciELO