,37 '3. 7-
FORSCHUNGS
museum
KOENIG
Bonn
zoological
Bulletin
formerly: Bonner zoologische Beitrage
Volume 63
Issue 2
2014
An open access journal of organismal zoology, published by
Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Bonn
Bonn zoological Bulletin (BzB), formerly “Bonner zoologische Beitrage”, is published by the Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum
Alexander Koenig - Leibniz-Institut fur Biodiversitat der Tiere (ZFMK), Bonn. Two regular issues of BzB are published per year;
supplements on focus topics are produced in irregular succession.
Subscription price is 46 € per volume (year), excluding supplements, including shipping costs. For subscription, back issues and
institutional exchange, please contact the ZFMK library (ZFMK), Bibliothek, Frau Mareike Bollen, Adenauerallee 160, 53113
Bonn, Germany, tel. +49 228-9122-216, fax: +49 228-9122-212; m.bollen@zfmk.de. The online version of BzB is available free
of charge at the BzB homepage: http://www.zoologicalbulletin.de.
© 2014 Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig - Leibniz-Institut fur Biodiversitat der Tiere (ZFMK). Bonn, Ger-
many. ISSN 2190-7307. Produced by Eva-Maria Levermann, Kaiserstr. 129, 53 1 13 Bonn, Germany; emlevenriann@netcologne.de.
Printed and bound by DCM, Wemer-von-Siemens-Str. 13, 53340 Meckenheim, Germany.
Bonn zoological Bulletin
Editor-in-Chief
Fabian Herder, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander
Koenig (ZFMK), Ichthyology Section, Adenauerallee 160,
53113 Bonn, Germany, tel. +49 228-9122-255,
fax: +49 228-9122-212; f.herder@zfmk.de
Managing Editor Supplement Series
Thomas YVesener, ZFMK, tel. +49 228-9 122-125,
fax: +49 228-9122-212; twesener@zfmk.de
Editorial Board
Dirk Ahrens, Insects: Coleoptera, ZFMK,
tel. +49 228-9122-286; d.ahrens@zfmk.de
Wolfgang Bohme, Amphibians and Reptiles, ZFMK,
tel. +49 228-9122-250; w.boehme@zfmk.de
Jan Decher, Mammals, ZFMK, tel. +49 228-9122-262;
j .decher@zfmk.de
Netta Dorchin. Insects: Diptera, Department of Zoology, Tel
Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel,
tel. +972-3-6409808; ndorchin@post.tau.ac.il
Bernhard Huber, Invertebrates except Insects, ZFMK,
tel. +49 228-9122-294; b.huber@zfmk.de
Rainer Hutterer, Mammals, ZFMK, tel. +49 228-9122-261;
r.hutterer@zfmk.de
Ximo Mengual, Insects: Diptera, ZFMK,
tel. +49 228-9122-292; x.mengual@zfmk.de
Gustav Peters, Mammals, ZFMK, tel. +49 228-9122-279;
g.peters@zfmk.de
Ralph Peters. Insects: Hymenoptera, ZFMK,
tel +49 228-9122-290; r.peters@zfmk.de
Bradley Sinclair, Canadian National Collection of Insects,
Ottawa Plant Laboratory - Entomology, CFIA, K.W. Neat-
by Bldg., C.E.F., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, ON, Canada
K1A0C6, tel. + 1 613-759-1787;
bradley.sinclair@inspection.gc.ca
Dieter Stiining, Insects except Coleoptera and Diptera,
ZFMK, tel. +49 228-9122-220;
d.stuening.zfmk@uni-bonn.de
Till Topfer, Birds, ZFMK, tel. +49 228-9122-246;
t.toepfer@zfmk.de
Philipp Wagner, Amphibians and Reptiles, Naturmuseum,
Umweltschutz-Informationszentrum Lindenhof, Karolinen-
reuther StraBe 58, 95448 Bayreuth, tel. +49 921-75942-0;
philipp.wagner.zfmk@uni-bonn.dc
Advisory Board
Theo C. M. Bakker, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Univer-
sitat, Institut fur Evolutionsbiologie & Okologie, 53113
Bonn, Germany, tel. +49 228-73-5130,
fax: +49 228-73-2321; t.bakker@uni-bonn.de
Aaron M. Bauer, Villanova University, Department of Biolo-
gy, 800 Lancaster Avenue, Villanova, PA 19085-1699,
USA, tel. +1 610-519-4857, fax: +1 610-519-7863;
aaron ,bauer@vi 1 lanova .edu
Wieslaw Bogdanowicz, Museum and Institute of Zoology,
Polish Academy of Sciences, Wilcza 64, 00-679 Warszawa,
Poland, tel. +48 22-628-7304, fax: +48 22-629-6302;
wieslawb@miiz.waw.pl
Matthias Glaubrecht, Museum fur Naturkunde Berlin, Leib-
niz-Institut fur Evolutions- und Biodiversitatsforschung an
der Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin, Invalidenstrasse 43,
10115 Berlin, Germany, tel. +49 30-2093-8504/ 8400,
fax: +49 030-2093-8565;
matthias.glaubrecht@mfn-berlin.de
Jeremy D. Holloway, The Natural History Museum, Depart-
ment of Entomology, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD,
U.K.; j.holloway@nhm.ac.uk
Tan Heok Hui. Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research.
National University of Singapore, Department of Biological
Sciences, 6 Science Drive 2, #03-01, Singapore 117546,
tel. +65-6516 1662, heokhui@nus.edu.sg
Boris Krystufek, Slovenian Museum of Natural History,
P.O. Box 290, Ljubljana, Slovenia;
boris.k17stufek@zrs.upr.si
Wolfgang Schawaller, Staatliches Museum fur Naturkunde,
Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany,
tel. +49 711-8936-221, fax: +49 711-8936-100;
schawaller.smns@naturkundemuseum-bw.de
Ulrich K. Schliewen, Department of Ichthyology, Bavarian
State Collection of Zoology, Miinchhausenstr. 21, 81247
Miinchen, Germany, tel. + 49 89-8107-1 10;
schliewen@zsm.mwn.de
Michael Schmitt, Ernst-Moritz-Amdt-Universitat, Allge-
meine & Systematische Zoologie, Anklamer Str. 20, 17489
Greifswald, Germany, tel. +49 3834-86^4242, fax: +49
3834-86-4098; michael.schmitt@uni-greifswald.de
W. David Sissom, Dept, of Life, Earth and Environmental
Sciences, W. Texas A. & M. University, WTAMU Box
60808, Canyon, Texas 79016, USA, tel. +1 806-651-2578,
fax: +1 806-651-2928; dsissom@mail.wtamu.edu
Miguel Vences, Technical University of Braunschweig, Zoo-
logical Institute, Spiclmannstr. 8, 38106 Braunschweig,
Germany, tel. +49 531-391-3237, fax: +49 31-391-8198;
m.vences@tu-bs.de
Erich Weber, Eberhard-Karls-Universitat, Zoologische
Schausammlung, Sigwartstr. 3, 72076 Tubingen,
tel. +49 7071-2972616, fax +49 7071-295170;
erich.weber@uni-tuebingen.de
I
, 3 7cZ 70*
fj-tt
FORSCHUNGS
museum
KOENIG
Bonn
zoological
Bulletin
formerly: Bonner zoologische Beitrage
Index 2014
Volume 63
Issue 1-2
KOENIG
Bonn
zoological
Bulletin
Volume 63
Issue 1
2014
■v^L KOENIG
Bonn Volume 63
zoological lss2u0e,4
Bulletin
Editor-in-Chief
Fabian Herder
Editorial Board
Dirk Ahrens
Wolfgang Bohme
Jan Decher
Netta Dorchin
Bernhard A. Huber
Rainer Hutterer
Ximo Mengual
Gustav Peters
Ralph Peters
Bradley Sinclair
Dieter Stuning
Till Topfer
Philipp Wagner
An open access journal of organismal zoology, published by
Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig - Leibniz-lnstitut fur Biodiversitat derTiere, Bonn
Contents Volume 63
Grebennikov, Vasily V.: 123-147
Morimotodes, a new genus for two minute wingless litter species from
southwest China and Taiwan with an illustrated overview of Molityna and Plithina genera (Coleoptera: Curculionidae:
Molityni)
Vol. 63 Issue 1 : June 2014
Vol. 63 Issue 2: December 2014
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 123-147
December 2014
Morimotodes , a new genus for two minute wingless litter species
from southwest China and Taiwan with an illustrated overview of
Molytina and Plinthina genera (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Molytini)
Vasily V. Grebennikov
Canadian Food Inspection Agency, K.W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, ON K1A 0Y9, Canada;
E-mail: vasily. grebennikov@inspection.gc. ca
Abstract. The new weevil genus Morimotodes g. n. is described for two new species: M. ismene sp. n. (Yunnan and Sichuan)
and M. polynices sp. n. (Taiwan). Morimotodes ismene sp. n. is designated as the type species of Morimotodes g. n. Species
are small (1. 6-2.1 mm), wingless inhabitants of leaf litter in montane deciduous forests with characteristically globular
body and obliterate elytral striae and dorsal sculpture. Analysis of DN A barcodes and external similarity suggest that Mo-
rimotodes g. n. is a sister to the West Palaearctic genus Leiosoma Stephens, 1829 with 32 similarly small-bodied and lit-
ter-inhabiting species. Dated intraspecific phylogeographic analysis utilizing DNA barcodes of M. ismene sp. n. reveals
seven strongly supported geographical clades, four of which are allopatric and three others are parapatric on Mt. Emei
in Sichuan. Potentially allied genera belonging to two of the three Molytinini subtribes, Molytina and Plinthina, are il-
lustrated and briefly discussed. Type specimens of five exceptionally poorly known genera ( Carbonomassula Heller, 1908,
Clarkantlms Alonso-Zarazaga & Lyal, 1999, Gonotrachelus Champion, 1914, Vouauxia Hustache, 1920, Pterotomus Que-
denfeldt, 1888) are re-examined and the original labels illustrated.
Key words: Yunnan, Sichuan, Taiwan, COl, DNA barcoding, phylogeography
INTRODUCTION
In 2008, a first long series of conspicuous but unknown
beetles was discovered by sifting forest leaf litter on the
eastern slope of the Cang Shan Mountain Range in Yun-
nan (China). The peculiarly small, lustrous and rounded
body in combination with the rounded elytral shoulders
strongly resembled other litter-inhabiting wingless
Palaearctic Molytinae, i.e. Otibazo Morimoto, 1961 or
Leiosoma Stephens (Fig. 7). The subsequent four years of
intensive sampling in the same and nearby forests of
Southwest China revealed additional similarly shaped
specimens. A long series of another seemingly congener-
ic species was detected among unidentified specimens col-
lected two decades earlier in Taiwan by Ales Smetana (Fig.
6). The generic identity of these beetles, however, re-
mained elusive.
Since the original discovery in 2008, these beetles were
repeatedly compared to many others, mainly belonging to
the wingless members of Molytinae. Eventually it became
evident that these finds represented a previously undetect-
ed clade presumably deserving a formal status of a new
genus. This thought intensified the search for its possible
relatives. That pursuit was long inconclusive, since numer-
ous unrelated wingless Molytinae were infamous for their
convergent similarity linked to the loss of hind wings (Lyal
2014). DNA-based search for relatives of the new genus
was similarly inconclusive, since the dataset did not
Received: 07.08.2014
Accepted: 12.11.2014
contain many critical and important taxa. Moreover, due
limitations in funding, the DNA work was done with the
single marker of the DNA barcode (part of cytochrome
oxidase I, Hebert et al. 2003), which had significant lim-
itations in its applicability for detecting relatively old evo-
lutionary events (Grebennikov & Heiss 2014). Eventual-
ly, however, a representative of the genus Leiosoma be-
came available for DNA analysis and consistently clus-
tered with a clade representing the new genus. At that point
the project’s results were judged mature enough to be for-
mally presented, even though some shortcomings linked
to a shortage of the material and data remained (see Dis-
cussion).
Another coincidental event further triggering the com-
pletion of this project was the recent publication of the
long-awaited “Phytophaga” volume of the Handbook of
Zoology series, most specifically the chapter on the wee-
vil subfamily Molytinae (Lyal 2014). This subfamily has
long been and still is a phylogenetic challenge. In the
aforementioned chapter the tribes of Molytinae were sig-
nificantly reorganized, as compared to the earlier standard
works of reference (Alonso-Zarazaga & Lyal 1999;
Bouchard et al. 2011; Alonso-Zarazaga 2013). The most
noticeable novelty, however, was the incorporation of the
entire former “subfamily Cryptorhynchinae” into Molyti-
nae, the latter presently containing 37 tribes plus ca. 28
Corresponding editor: D. Ahrens
124
Vasily V. Grebennikov
incertae sedis genera (Lyal 2014: 530, 531). This decision
is in line with the pivotal work of Kuschel (1987) amal-
gamating a multitude of former “subfamilies” into a broad-
ly defined Molytinae (then excluding “Cryptorhynchi-
nae”). Both steps are seen as a much needed attempt to
make the formal classification more in line with the cur-
rent phylogenetic hypothesis (for example, see the remark-
able mosaic of both former “subfamilies” in McKenna et
al. 2009). Given an acute lack of the phylogenetic frame-
work for the subfamily and for the great majority of its
tribes, numerous further changes in Molytinae classifica-
tions will undoubtedly follow. To move forward, a prac-
tical approach was outlined (Lyal 2014: 549) as to “... pro-
pose initial hypotheses for monophyletic groups within the
Molytinae and then analyze them with both molecular and
morphological characters...” This paper presents an at-
tempt to answer this call for actions on Molytinae sub-
groups and to shed light on a small subsection of this
grand, if indeed monophyletic, radiation.
This work has three main goals. First, to name formal-
ly the newly discovered genus and its two species. Sec-
ond, to utilize available mtDNA sequences to test the
monophyly of the genus and to search for the possible sis-
ter group. Third, to discuss and delimit species boundaries
and to undertake a dated phylogeographical analysis.
Forth, to advance understanding of Molytinae genera cur-
rently attributed to the subtribes Molytina and Plinthina
by providing an annotated list of taxa, illustrating a rep-
resentative species for all but three genera and clarifying
the identity of five obscure genera by re-examination of
the type specimens of their type species. Overall, this pa-
per continues the recently initiated efforts to assess phy-
logeographical patterns detected from the low-dispersing
Hightless weevils in southwestern China and adjacent
lands and to clarify the taxonomy and diversity of wing-
less Old World Molytinae (Grebennikov 2014).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Museum abbreviations, followed by the name of the cu-
rator:
BMNH Natural History Museum, London, UK
(M. Barclay);
CMN Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, Canada
(R. Anderson, F. Genier);
CNC Canadian National Collection of Insects,
Arachnids and Nematodes, Ottawa,
Canada (P. Bouchard);
IZCAS Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of
Science, Beijing, P.R. China (R. Zhang);
MNHN Museum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris,
France (H. Perrin);
MRAC Musee Royal de l’Afrique Centrale, Tervuren,
Belgium (M. De Meyer);
MTD Senckenberg Naturhistorische Sammlungen,
Dresden, Germany (K.-D. Klass, O. Jager);
NHMB Naturhistorisches Museum, Basel, Switzerland
(E. Sprecher);
NMW Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien,
Austria (H. Schillhammer);
ZIN Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of
Sciences, St. Petersburg,
Russia (B.A. Korotyaev).
This study is based on examination of a total of 97 dry-
mounted adult specimens of the new genus. Concepts of
the Curculionoidea family-group names and assignment
of weevil genera to tribes follow Bouchard et al. (201 1 )
and Alonso-Zarazaga & Lyal (1999), respectively, with
subsequent significant modifications by Lyal (2014). The
chronostratigraphic timing is that of Cohen et al. (2013)
with the Pliocene-Pleistocene boundary set at 2.588 MY.
Nomenclature of male genitalia follows that of Wanat
(2007). The length of the body was measured in dorsal as-
pect from the elytral apex to the front of the pronotum.
Geographical labels of the newly described species are cit-
ed verbatim in quotation marks. The hypothetical most re-
cent common ancestor of a monophyletic group referred
to in the discussion is abbreviated as MRCA. The distri-
bution map was generated using the online SinrpleMap-
pr tool (Shorthouse 2010). Species identification of the
two sequenced specimens of Leiosoma reitteri (Bedel) was
done based on the assumption that this is the only species
of the genus known from Georgia (Alonso-Zarazaga
2013). The type species are cited using their presently
valid names, which are not necesserely the same when the
type species were designated; the latter can be found in
Alonso-Zarazaga & Lyal ( 1999).
DNA dataset. All specimens submitted to DNA barcod-
ing have a unique identifier label with the code CNC-
COLVG0000XXXX; this format is shortened to #XXXX
when specimens are cited in the text. All details regard-
ing sequencing, primers, PCR protocols as well as the list
of specimen information including provenience and
voucher number can be seen by accessing the online
dataset at: dx.doi.org/10.5883/DS-MORIMO90. In a few
cases a specimen failed to amplify DNA from the first at-
tempt and was later resubmitted; in such cases a digit “1”
after a dot follows the original four digit number (like
#0251.1 on Fig. 7). The dataset used for the first DNA
analysis contained 90 sequences and 658 aligned positions.
The ingroup was formed by 46 newly generated se-
quences, each representing a specimen of the continental
new species of the new genus (GenBank accessions:
HM4 1 7727-32, HQ986799, HQ986876-8, HQ987105,
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 123-147
©ZFMK
Morimotodes, a new weevil genus from China
125
HQ9871 34-5, HQ987 1 59, HQ987 1 79-8 1 , KJ87 1 620-32,
KJ87 1634-5, KJ87 1637-40, KJ87 1 642-5 1 ). All but one
specimen representing another new species collected in
Taiwan in 1992-1998 were submitted to DNA barcoding
but failed to amplify, likely because of either their age,
collecting methods or storage degraded DNA. No fresh
specimens of the target genus were recovered in Taiwan
during a month-long fieldwork in 2013. The majority of
the ingroup sequences were 658 basepairs (bp) long and
no one shorter than 407 bp. The outgroup consisted of 44
sequences and represented all Molytinae genera with avail-
able DNA barcode data (Fig. 7), while three sequences of
Graptus circassicus Solari, 1945 (Entiminae) were used
to root the topology in the first analysis (see below). All
outgroup sequences were of the full DNA barcode length
(658 bp). Three of the outgroup sequences representing
the genus Plinthus Germar, 1817 (KJ871633, KJ871636,
KJ871641 ) were newly generated. The remaining 41 out-
group sequences were taken from previous works
(HM386450, HM4 17677-9, HQ986888-9, HQ987002-3,
KJ427730-2, KJ427736-9, KJ427744, KJ427746,
KJ427748, KJ445683-4, J445687, KJ445690-1,
KJ445693-4, KJ445698-6, KJ445708-9, KJ445712-3,
KJ445715 in Grebennikov 2014; KJ841729, KJ841731 in
Grebennikov & Pham 2014). Specimen images (when
present), geographical data, primers, original chro-
matograms and other relevant data for all 90 sequenced
specimens can be found online in the publicly accessible
dataset “ Morimotodes ” on the Barcode of Life Database
portal (doi: dx.doi.org/10.5883/DS-MORIMO90).
DNA-based phylogenetic analyses. Two separate tree
search analyses were run. The first analysis aimed at test-
ing monophyly of the new genus represented by the type
species, search for its sister-group and to examine its in-
ternal relationships. The original DNA dataset containing
90 sequences was analysed using the Maximum Likeli-
hood (ML) approach with statistical branch support test-
ed by 1000 replications of bootstrapping in MEGA 5
(Tamura et al. 2013). The search for the optimal substi-
tution model for both analyses was done in MEGA 5 and
resulted in the same model (GTR+G+I). The second tree
search analysis was performed to date the branching
events in the continental species of the new genus and to
re-test the interrelationships hypothesis, as already sug-
gested in the first analysis. The original matrix of 90 se-
quences was reduced to 33 to include only the full-length
DNA barcodes (658 nt) of 3 1 ingroup specimens and two
specimens of the sister group (the genus Leiosoma , as sug-
gested in the first analysis). The second analysis was per-
formed in BEAST vl.8.0 (Drummond et al. 2012) utiliz-
ing the Bayesian inference (BI) approach with no a pri-
ori internal grouping, all default priors and options,
GRT+G+I nucleotide substitution model, strict linear mo-
lecular clock and nucleotide substitution rate of 0.0 1 8 ( Pa-
padopoulou et al. 2010). The “burn in’’ option was imple-
mented eliminating the first 2500 of the 10000 obtained
trees. Two resulting topologies, each representing either
ML or BEAST analysis, were visualized in FigTree vl.4
(Rambaut 2013) and presented by Figs 7 and 8, respec-
tively.
Use of morphological data. A formal morphology-based
phylogentic analysis of Molytinae genera to search for the
sister group of the new genus was beyond the scope of
the present paper. Even restricted to 8 1 genera of the tribe
of Molytini (80 mentioned in Lyal 2014, and the new one),
the task was judged as too daunting. An attempt was made
to illustrate a representative of all genera currently as-
signed to Molytina and Plinthina (13 and 17, respective-
ly; see Lyal 2014: 530, 53 1 ; images of three genera were
not obtainable). Five particularly poorly known genera
were elucidated in more details, with their type specimens
and original labels imaged. The third remaining Molyti-
ni subtribe, Flylobiina, historically considered as a tribe
of its own and incorporating 5 1 winged genera (Lyal 2014)
was not included in this treatment. This decision is part-
ly due to the large size of this tribe. The second reason
for exclusion is that until very recently, Hylobiina were
formally in a separate tribe and, therefore, not specifical-
ly targeted since 2008, when this project was in prepara-
tion.
Morimotodes g. n.
Type-species: Morimotodes ismene sp. n., by original des-
ignation.
Diagnosis. Adult specimens of Morimotodes g. n. can be
immediately recognized from other Curculionoidea known
both from the Eastern Palaearctic and the Oriental Region
by their habitus. They are small (about 2 mm) brown or
reddish beetles with lustrous dorsum, rounded body and
nearly obliterated elytral shoulders and striae. In the area
of their known distribution, namely in Yunnan, Sichuan
and Taiwan, as well as in the adjacent regions, adults of
Morimotodes externally resemble those of Otibazo Mo-
rimoto. The latter, however, has not yet been discovered
in China (although its presence is possible, since the first
continental species has been recently detected in north-
ern Vietnam, see Grebennikov & Pham, 2014). Adults of
Otibazo are immediately distinguishable from nearly all
weevils by their unique fields of short dense pubescence
forming characteristic whitish tufts on flagella, femora and
tibiae (Fig. 7), not found in Morimotodes. Field recogni-
tion of Morimotodes can be facilitated by stressing their
biological preferences. All known specimens have been
found in wet leaf litter of primary deciduous forests in the
altitudinal range of 1947^4072 m in southwestern China
and 1110-2550 m in Taiwan. From the most closely re-
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 123-147
©ZFMK
126
Vasily V. Grebennikov
Fig. I. Morimotodes ismene g. & sp. n., holotype, male, #0928 from Gaoligong Mt. Range, Yunnan. A-D: habitus; E-G: aedea-
gus and tegment, dorsal (E), ventral (F), lateral; (G); H: stemites 8 and 9.
lated genus Leiosoma, adults of Morimotodes g. n. can be
easily distinguished by their brown or reddish colour
(Leiosoma adults are black) and, additionally, by a wide
gap in distribution ( Leiosoma is restricted to the West
Palaearctic and, therefore, is widely allopatric with Mo-
rimotodes g. n.).
Description. Small (1.6-2. 1 mm) and uniformly brown
or dark reddish, lustrous, wingless weevils. Dorsal surface
of pronotum and elytra without longitudinal ridges, cari-
nae or irregular sculpture; elytral striae weakly indicated
by individual rows of fine setiferous punctures surround-
ed by clearly restricted zone of darker pigmentation (Figs
1 A-C, 6A-C); setiferous punctures on pronotum shallow-
er, not arranged in longitudinal rows and lacking pigment-
ed surroundings (Figs 1 A-C, 6A-C). Length of dorsal se-
tae variable, from almost indistinguishable under 50x mag-
nification (Figs 6A-C, “polished” specimens) to relative-
ly long and exceeding in length longitudinal distance be-
tween setiferous punctures (Figs 4B, 5B, “hairy” speci-
mens). Integument clean, not covered by incrustation or
wax secretion. Elytra with shoulders entirely levelled, in
dorsal view strongly and evenly rounded, 1 .5-1 .8x as wide
as maximal prothoracic width. Body dorsal outline in lat-
eral view evenly and relatively strongly curved (Fig. 5);
elytra neither flattened dorsally, nor declivate apically.
Head capsule moderately visible from above (Fig. 4). Eyes
laterally, not reduced in size. Antennal attachments in api-
cal third of rostrum; funicle with seven antennomeres;
compact club consisting of three antennomeres. Pronotum
not constricted laterally in anterior quarter; widest at mid-
dle or at base; prosternum without rostral canal or ocular
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 123-147
©ZFMK.
Morimotodes, a new weevil genus from China
127
Fig. 2. Morimotodes ismene g. & sp. n., paratype, female, #1020 from Gaoligong Mt. Range, Yunnan. A-D: habitus, E: genital
stemites 8 & 9, ventral view.
lobes; procoxae contiguous. All femora without tooth.
Hind wings absent. Sclerolepidia absent (Fig. 3E). Aedea-
gus weakly sclerotized, dorsally and ventrally membra-
nous and translucent; endophallus without slerotization
(Figs 1 E, F, 6E, F). Female hemistemites 9 each with sep-
arate and clearly distinguishable basal and apical pieces
(Fig. 2E; “coxite” and “stylus”, respectively).
Species composition and distribution. As currently
known, the genus Morimotodes g. n. comprises two
species, each relatively widely distributed in Southwest
China (Yunnan and Sichuan) or in Taiwan, respectively.
Biology. All specimens of Morimotodes were collected by
sifting deciduous leaf litter in montane primary forests
with subsequent specimen extraction using Winkler fun-
nels. These collecting circumstances were further corrob-
orated by the loss of hind wings, which strongly suggest
that Morimotodes species are habitat-dependant low-dis-
persing forest litter inhabitants critically dependant on this
habitat. Immature stages, host plants or any specific bio-
logical preferences remain unknown.
Etymology. Morimotodes , patronymic, derived by adding
the Latin suffix -odes to the family name of Katsura Mo-
rimoto (retired, formerly professor at Kyushu Elniversity,
Fukuoka, Japan), in recognition of his outstanding con-
tribution to the knowledge of weevils from the Asia-Pa-
cific Region. Gender masculine.
Morimotodes ismene sp. n.
Figs 1-5.
Diagnostic description. Holotype, male (Fig. 1). Gen-
Bank accession: HQ987135. Length: 1.85 mm. Dorsal out-
line of pronotum in lateral view evenly rounded; prono-
tum and elytra dorsally with fine punctures and white pi-
losity visible at magnification below 30x; each elytron
with single longitudinal groove adjacent and parallel to
edge. Acdeagus parallel-sided; sternite 9 not subdivided
and not wider than 1.5x width of apodeme; sternal
apodeme 9 with large paddle-shaped extension anterior-
ly. Intraspecific variation. Length: 1.60-2.0 mm. Body
outline in dorsal and lateral views variable (Figs 4, 5),
pronotum in basal half either parallel-sided (Fig. 4D) or
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 123-147
©ZFMK
128
Vasily V. Grebennikov
Fig. 3. Morimotodes ismene g. & sp. n., unsexed, #0427 from Cang Shan Mt. Range, Yunnan. SEM images. A: head, left later-
al; B: head and pronotum, left lateral; C: head, frontal; D: rostrum, frontal; E: meso- and metathorax, left lateral; F: claws, later-
al; G: pronotum and head, dorsal; H: meso- and metathorax, right ventro-lateral; I: elytra, left lateral. Mst: metepistemum, mtv:
metaventrite, col-co3: pro-, meso- and metaxocae, respectively, vtl : ventrite 1 (=abdominal segment 3). Note absence of sclerole-
pidia on metepisternal suture separating metepistemum and metaventrite; the presence of this suture in apterous weevils is unusu-
al.
weakly broadened posterad (Fig. 4E); dorsal outline of ros-
trum-to-head junction even (Fig. 5B), evenly and weak-
ly depressed (Figs 1 A, 5A) or marked more abruptly (Fig.
5D). Dorsal body puncture and pilosity variable, from
mostly faint (Fig. 5D) to markedly developed (Fig. 5B).
Material examined. Holotype male (IZCAS): #0928,
“P.R. CHINA, Yunnan, E slope N Gaoligongshan,
N27°47’22. 1 E098°32’17.7, 24.V.2010, 3027m, sifting20,
V.Grebennikov”. Paratypes (CNC, IZCAS, MTD), 19 in
total; 4 exx, #0114-6, #0503: “P.R. CHINA, Yunnan, E
slope N Gaoligongshan, N27°46.212’ E098°36.221\
12.vi.2009, 2312m, sifting02, V.Grebennikov”; 5 exx,
#0144 and 4 not numbered: “P.R. CHINA, Yunnan, E
slope N Gaoligongshan, N27°46.782’ E098°33.087\
14. vi. 2009, 2956m, sifting04, V.Grebennikov”; 2 exx, not
numbered: “P.R. CHINA, Yunnan, E slope N Gaoligong-
shan, N27°46.665’ E098°33.32 1 ’, 15.vi.2009, 2982m, sift-
ing05, V.Grebennikov”; I ex, not numbered: “P.R. CHI-
NA, Yunnan, E slope N Gaoligongshan, N27°46.635’
E098°33.381’, 16.vi.2009, 2946m, sifting07, V.Greben-
nikov”; 2 exx, #0927 and 1 not numbered: same data as
holotype; 1 ex, #0977: 2010/21 “P.R. CHINA, Yunnan, E
slope N Gaoligongshan, N27°47’22.1 E098°32’17.7,
24.V.2010, 3027m, sifting21, V.Grebennikov”; 4 exx,
#1017-20: “P.R. CHIN A, Yunnan, E slope N Gaoligong-
shan, N27°59’01 .0 E098°32’56.9, 27.V.2010, 3018m, sift-
ing22, V.Grebennikov”.
Additional non-type specimens: Cang Shan Mt. Range
(15 in total, CNC): 14 exx, #0300-1, #0427, #0499-502,
7 not numbered: “P.R. CHINA, Yunnan, Cangshan,
N25°40.381’ E100°08.016\ 30.V.2008, 2600m, sifting,
V.Grebennikov”; 1 ex, #0867: “P.R. CHINA, Yunnan, E
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 123-147
©ZFMK
Morimotodes, a new weevil genus from China
129
Fig. 4. Morimotodes ismene g. & sp. n., unsexed, dorsal view. A: #2409 from Mount Gongga, Sichuan; B: #4483 from Mount
Haba, Yunnan; C: #6185 from Mount Emei, Sichuan; D: #1105 from Mount Emei, Sichuan; E: #0867 from Cang Shan Mt. Range,
Yunnan; F: #0251 from Mount Emei, Sichuan. Scale: 1 mm.
slope Cangshan at Dali, N25°40’15.5 E100°07’45.4,
18.V.2010, 2657m, sifting 1 7, V.Grebennikov”. Mount Ha-
ba (6 in total, CNC): 4 exx, #4481-4: “CHINA, Yunnan,
Haba Shan, N27°21’01“ El 00°05’44”, 21.vi.2012,
4072m, sift26, V. Grebennikov”; 2 exx, #4536-7: “CHI-
NA, Yunnan, Haba Shan, N27°21'01“ E100°05’44”,
28.vi.20 12, 4072m, sift35, V. Grebennikov”. Mount
Gongga (9 in total, CNC): 1 ex, #2409: “P.R. CHINA,
Sichuan, NE slope Gongga Shan, N29°48’I5”
E102°03’44”, 06.vi.201 1, 2765m, siftl 1, V.Grebennikov;
1 ex, #2456: “P.R. CHINA, Sichuan, NE slope Gongga
Shan, N29°50’50” EI02°02’28”, 09.vi.2011, 3170m,
sift 1 4, V.Grebennikov”; 3 exx, #2471-3: “P.R. CHINA,
Sichuan, NE slope Gongga Shan, N29°50’05”
E102°02’53”, 1 1 .vi.201 1, 3019m, siftl 5, V.Grebennikov”;
2 exx, #2559-60: “P.R. CHINA, Sichuan, NE slope Gong-
ga Shan, N29°49’33” E102°03’06”, 21. vi.201 1, 2977m,
sift24, V.Grebennikov”; 3 exx, #2562-3: “P.R. CHINA,
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 123-147
©ZFMK
130
Vasily V. Grebennikov
Fig. 5. Morimotodes ismene g. & sp. n., unsexed, left lateral view. A: #2409 from Mount Gongga, Sichuan; B: #4483 from Mount
Haba, Yunnan; C: #6185 from Mount Emei, Sichuan; D: #1 105 from Mount Emei, Sichuan; E: #0867 from Cang Shan Mt. Range,
Yunnan; F: #0251 from Mount Emei, Sichuan. Scale: 1 mm.
Sichuan, NE slope Gongga Shan, N29°49’29”
E102°03’24”, 21 .vi.201 1, 2986m, sift25, V.Grebennikov”.
Mount Emei, clade EM-A (10 in total, CNC): 10 exx,
#1216-9: #6184-9: “P.R. CHINA, Sichuan, EmeiShan,
N29°32’37.3 E103°19’57.5, 18.vi.2010, 2440m, sifting37,
V.Grebennikov”; clade EM-B (6 in total, CNC): 4 exx,
#0251-3, #0504: “P.R. CHINA, Sichuan, Emei Shan,
N29°32.932’ EI03°20.466\ 01.vii.2009, 2310m, sift-
ing 1 4, V.Grebennikov”; 1 ex, #0505: “P.R. CHINA,
Sichuan, Emei Shan, N29°32.806’ E103°20.106\
03.vii.2009, 2342m, sifting 1 5, V.Grebennikov”; 1 ex,
#1172 and #4186 (two numbers on the same specimen):
“PR. CHINA, Sichuan, EmeiShan, N29°32’37.3
E103°19’57.5, 18. vi. 2010, 2440m, sifting37, V.Greben-
nikov”; clade EM-C ( 1 in total, CNC): 1 ex, #1105: “P.R.
CHINA, Sichuan, EmeiShan, N29°33’36.3 E103°20’38.0,
15.vi.2010, 1947m, sifting33, V.Grebennikov”.
Distribution. The species is known from five isolated high
altitude forest regions in Yunnan and Sichuan provinces
(Fig. 9).
Etymology. The species epithet is the Latinized Greek
mythical name of Ismene, a daughter and half-sister of
Oedipus, daughter and granddaughter of Jocasta, and sis-
ter of Polynices; noun in apposition.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 123-147
©ZFMK
Morimotodes , a new weevil genus from China
131
sternite 9
Fig. 6. Morimotodes polynices g. & sp. n., holotype, male, #5949 from Taiwan. A-D: habitus; E-G: aedeagus and tegment, dor-
sal (E), ventral (F), lateral; (G); H: sternites 8 and 9.
Morimotodes polynices sp. n.
Fig. 4.
Diagnostic description. Holotype, male (Fig. 6). DNAnot
sequenced. Length: 2.00 mm. Dorsal outline of pronotum
in lateral view with hump in basal third; pronotum and ely-
tra dorsally with fine punctures and pilosity not visible at
magnification below 30x; each elytron without longitu-
dinal groove parallel to edge. Aedeagus rounded lateral-
ly, sternite 9 Y-shaped and about 3-5x wider than
apodeme; sternal apodeme 9 without extention anterior-
ly. Intraspecific variation. Length: 1.98-2.12 mm.
Material examined. Holotype male (CMN): #5949 “TAI-
WAN, Kaohsiung Hs. Rd. Abv. Tona For. Sta. Km 16-17,
1700-1 800m 28. V. 1998, A. Smetana (T190)”. Paratypes
(CNC, CMN), 26 in total: 2 exx, #5925-6: “TAIWAN,
Kaohsiung Hsien, Kuanshan trail at Kaunshanchi Riv.
2400 m 24.VI. 1992 A. Smetana (T94)”; 9 exx, #5927-35:
“TAIWAN, Kaohsiung Hsien, Peinantashan trail, 2000m
7. VII. 93 A. Smetana (T144)”; 1 ex, #0587: “TAIWAN,
Kaohsiung Hsien, Kuanshan trail above Kaunshanchi Riv.,
2550m, 22.VII.93 A. Smetana (T160)”; 1 ex, #5936: “TAI-
WAN, Kaohsiung Hsien, Peinantashan trail 2450m,
2. V. 1995 A. Smetana (T170)”; 13 exx, #5940-8, #5950-3:
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 123-147
©ZFMK
132
Vasily V. Grebennikov
Morimotodes ismene g. et sp. n.
. Mt. Emei, Sichuan, clade EM-B
#4186
#0252.1
#0253.1
#0505
#0251.1
Mt. Gongga, Sichuan
0 94
#2563
#2471
#2559
#2562
#2456
# 2409
#2473
#2472
#2560
. Mt. Haba, Yunnan
0.85
#4483
#4537
#4484
#4482
#4481
#4536
022
0.05 substitutions/site S.--14
0.03
0.01
0,57
0.07
0.24
0.33
0.23
, Mt. Emei, Sichuan, clade EM-A
t Mt. Emei, Sichuan, clade EM-C
#6185
#6186
. #6184
.#6188
■#1216
- #1217
#6189
#1218
#1219
0.37 7
[ Cang Shan Mt. Range, Yunnan
#1105
#0867
#0500
#0502
#0501
#0499
#1017
#1018
#1020
2^3 Gaoligong Shan Mt. Range, Yunnan
0.7
0.62
0.74
#0503
#0115.1
#0114
#0116.1
#0927
#0928 Holotype
#0144
#0977
Leiosoma reitteri
Lobosoma rausense
Niphadomimus spp
0.88
Ectatorhinus adamsi
Typoderus furcatus
Acall/nus tuberculatus
Hylobius sp.
Adexius scrobipermis
Plinlhus spp
Anchonidium unguiculare
Aparopion costatum
Pissodes punctatus
Thalasselephas spp
Euthycus sp.
Otibazo polyphemus
Thromboslernus cuculatus
Fig. 7. Maximum Likelihood inference phylogram positioning monophyletic Morimotodes ismene g. & sp. n. (in black) as a sis-
ter to Leiosoma reitteri among other analysed Molytinae genera (in grey) using the 658 nt of the mtDNA barcoding COl gene
fragment. Digits at intemodes are bootstrap values. The tree is rooted on Graptus circassicus (Entiminae; not shown). Seven ge-
ographically linked lineages of M. ismene g. & sp. n. are marked in red; note that Mount Emei uniquely harbours three unrelated
lineages. Red and italicized numbers are those of imaged specimens (Figs 1, 4, 5) illustrating respective clades. Two pink ovals
with question marks denote two nodes not recovered in the alternative BI analysis (Fig. 8). Inserted image of the forest illustrates
exact spot where the type specimen #0928 was found.
same data as holotype. Additional non-type specimens:
3 exx, (CMN), #5937-9: “TAIWAN, Ilan Hsien Shen-Mi
Lake 24°22’43”N 121°44’12”E, 1110m I0.V.1995 A.
Smetana (T 1 77)”.
Distribution. The species is known from two widely sep-
arated regions in southern and northern Taiwan, respec-
tively (Fig. 9).
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 123-147
©ZFMK
Morimotodes , a new weevil genus from China
133
Pliocene
Pleistocene
Mt. Gongga, Sichuan
Mt. Haba, Yunnan
Mt. Emei, Sichuan, clade EM-A
Cang Shan Mt. Range, Yunnan
Mt, Emei, Sichuan, clade EM-C
Mt. Emei, Sichuan, clade EM-B
Gaoligong Shan Mt. Range,
Yunnan
Fig. 8. Ultrametic tree of Morimotodes ismene g. & sp. n. reconstructed using Baeysian inference method strict linear molecular
clock approach to analyse 658 nt of the mtDNA barcoding COl gene fragment and calibrated at a rate of 0.018
substitutions/site/MY. Numbers at nodes and on the scale below are million years before present. Node bars represent 95% confi-
dence intervals of the age estimate. Two pink ovals with question marks denote two nodes not recovered in the alternative ML
analysis (Fig. 7).
Fig. 9. Known distribution of Morimotodes g. n.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 123-147
©ZFMK
134
Vasily V. Grebennikov
Etymology. The species epithet is the Latinized Greek
mythical name of Polynices, the son of Oedipus and Jo-
casta, as well as a grandson of Jocasta; noun in apposi-
tion.
RESULTS
The first tree search resulted in a Maximum Likelihood
tree (Fig. 7) with the highest log likelihood of- 9190.09.
All analyzed specimens of M. ismene g. & sp. n. formed
a weakly supported clade (bootstrap value 25%). The
genus Morimotodes g. n., represented by only its type-
species, formed a moderately supported (52%) clade with
the genus Leiosoma. Forty-six analyzed specimens of M.
ismene sp. n. from five mountain regions formed seven
geographical lineages (one monotypical, six others sup-
ported with 100% bootstrap). Four of these lineages cor-
responded to four mountain regions (Fig. 7), while all 15
analyzed specimens from Mount Emei formed three
groups not most closely related to each other. Temporal
(second) analysis in BEAST (Fig. 8) recovered all Mori-
motodes specimens forming a clade with the same seven
lineages as in the first analysis, although the grouping
among themselves was not identical with the results of the
first analysis. The inferred timing of the splits forming the
seven geographically linked lineages within monophylet-
ic M. ismene g. & sp. n. detected in the second analysis
date between 10.34 MY to 3.46 MY (Fig. 8).
DISCUSSION
Monophyly and sister group of Morimotodes g. n.
As presently defined, the genus Morimotodes g. n. is most
likely monophyletic. This assertion is not tested by the
cladistic methods, and is based entirely on circumstantial
evidence. None of the 29 specimens of M. polynices g. &
sp. n. responded positively to a DNA amplification effort
and, therefore, the species was not represented in the DNA
analyses. Continental populations of Morimotodes g. n.
from Yunnan and Sichuan all assigned to a broadly defined
M. ismene g. & sp. n. were consistently recovered as a
monophyletic clade in the first tree analysis (Fig. 7). The
assumption of both Morimotodes g. n. species forming a
clade is based entirely on their adult external similarities,
further corroborated by the analogous collecting circum-
stances suggesting similar biology. The geographical gap
of about 2000 km separating known distributional areas
of both species is not large enough to shed significant
doubts on their sister group relationships. Such are all
presently available data to justify the implemented taxo-
nomic decisions of grouping both species into a presum-
ably monophyletic new genus.
The most surprising aspect of the first analysis is the rel-
atively weak statistical support for M. ismene g. & sp. n.
(25%, Fig. 7), which can be at least partly attributed to the
known phylogenetic limitations of COl (Maddison
2012), including the saturation effect.
The sister-group relationships between Morimotodes g.
n. and the West Palaearctic Leiosoma is moderately sup-
ported (bootstrap 52% ( Fig. 7). Close affinities of both
genera have been hypothesised ever since the first repre-
sentatives of Morimotodes g. n. came to notice in 2008,
and was grounded entirely on adult morphological simi-
larities (small weevils less than 3 mm in body length with
laterally rounded and not flattened bodies and with shiny
dorsum) and biological preferences (inhabitants of the de-
ciduous leaf litter). Analogous expectations for the simi-
larly shaped genus Otibazo were, however, rejected by the
ML tree, the latter clustered with the genus Euthycus (Fig.
7). At present, it is impossible to suggest phylogenetic
affinities of the clade Morimotodes g. n. + Leiosoma , since
the available data are highly inadequate. Pending further
investigation, the genus Morimotodes g. n. is placed in the
same higher taxonomic group containing its sister group
Molytinae: Molytini: Molytina.
If Morimotodes g. n. is indeed sister to Leiosoma , then
attribution of both new species from China to the former
genus could be a phylogenetically sound taxonomic alter-
native. It was, however, rejected because establishing a
new genus better reflects the significant external dissim-
ilarity between their members and the wide gap in their
known geographical distribution.
Species delimitation of Morimotodes g. n.
Both species of Morimotodes g. n. as presently defined
are much dissimilar to each other. The species from Tai-
wan, M. polynices sp. n., is known from a museum series
of externally remarkably similar specimens, all but three
of which were sampled from a geographically confined
region (Kaohsiung, Fig. 9) not more than 50 km in its
greatest detention and within the limited altitudinal range
( 1 700-2550 m). This evidence suggests that all type spec-
imens most likely share the MRCA. Three additional non-
type specimens from north of Taiwan ( llan. Fig. 9) are ex-
ternally most similar to those from the type locality and,
therefore, are thought to be conspecific, although with
lesser certainty. These two hypotheses could not be test-
ed using DNA data, since the sequences were not obtain-
able. Judging from the morphological and geographical
data, it seems unlikely that the Taiwanese specimens of
Morimotodes g. n. could be grouped within the clade
formed by their continental counterparts. This evidence,
although not tested phylogenetically, strongly suggests
separate evolutionary history for the Taiwanese lineage
worthy, therefore, of establishing a formal species.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 123-147
©ZFMK
Morimotodes , a new weevil genus from China
135
Deciding what to all a species for the continental mem-
bers of Morimotodes g. n. is ambiguous. The most inclu-
sive and conservative approach is, therefore, employed.
All specimens of Morimotodes g. n. from continental Chi-
na are presently assigned to the broadly defined M. ismene
sp. n. This uncertainty on species boundaries is not made
any easier by the relatively large amount of available rel-
evant data for the continental species. The implemented
decision to assign all continental Morimotodes g. n. to a
single species is a balanced temporary solution implement-
ed to minimize the conflict among four independent lines
of evidence (in the increasing order of their contribution):
( 1 ) biological characteristics, (2) morphological similar-
ity/dissimilarity (3) geographical distribution, and (4)
mtDNA sequences. The logic of their combined evalua-
tion is described below.
The condition determining the gene flow among Mori-
motodes g. n. populations inhabiting five continental lo-
calities (the Cang Shan and the Gaoligong Mountain
Ranges, as well as Mounts Haba, Gongga and Emei; Fig.
9) can be considered analogous to those acting for terres-
trial organisms confined to oceanic islands. This approx-
imation is commonly used for the low-dispersing and
flightless moisture- and habitat-dependent species found
in relatively wet isolated forests widely separated by seem-
ingly unsuitable lowlands. Such estimate might perhaps
be even an understatement of the dispersal difficulties for
the mountain species, since the salt water barriers are oc-
casionally crossed by seemingly most unseaworthy organ-
isms such as chameleons possibly rafting on dislodged
floating trees, or blind subterranean Arthropods perhaps
surviving the passage in soil attached to their roots (Rax-
worthy et al. 2002 and Peck 1 990, respectively). The very
first task with such allopatric mountainous low-dispers-
ing organisms as Morimotodes g. n. was, therefore, to as-
sess whether the specimens from each separate locality
form distinct evolutionary clusters and whether any of the
localities supports more than one such cluster.
The four aforementioned lines of evidence contributed
conflicting data. Biological data were the least informa-
tive, since all sampled specimens of M. ismene sp. n. were
sifted from seemingly similar forest litter and within com-
parable altitude range. The only exception was shown by
the Mount Haba specimens recovered from the upper for-
est zone at altitude notably higher than known for other
continental populations. Adult external morphology was
the second least informative line of evidence (see below
on the use of genital characters). Although the imaged
specimens representing each of seven clades were some-
what dissimilar to each other (note the hairy specimen
#4484 from Mount Haba, or the large and non-hairy spec-
imen #1105 representing the clade EM-C from Mount
Emei; Figs 4, 5), it was impossible to consistently distin-
guish the others. The most powerful signal came from the
mtDNA sequences, which grouped specimens from four
localities into four strongly supported corresponding
clades (Fig. 7). The exception was Mount Emei, where 14
specimens clustered in two unrelated groups (EM- A and
EM-B on Fig. 7) with an additional third equally unrelat-
ed lineage (EM-C) represented by a single specimen
#1 105. The emerging distributional pattern indicated that
each locality supports at least one lineage of Morimotodes
g. n., while Mount Emei has at least three such lineages.
The main operational problem was that the majority of the
seven detected radiations could neither be uniquely char-
acterized morphologically, nor biologically.
It should be noted that detecting seven evolutionary sep-
arate lineages of continental Morimotodes g. n. inhabit-
ing five discrete mountain regions is not prohibitive in it-
self. There are no reasons to expect that no more than a
single radiation of closely related low-dispersing organ-
isms should exist in any suitable locality. Among all five
continental localities. Mount Emei should be rightfully ex-
pected to be the most diverse in Morimotodes g. n., be-
cause it is overwhelmingly rich in other forms of life and
by that exceeds many other comparable localities. For ex-
ample, its relatively well documented flora condensed on
just 154 km2 and lacking the entire alpine zone, encom-
passes an astonishing 3703 species of higher plants (Wang
et al. 2013). This diversity exceeds Canada (3,156;
Mosquin et al. 1995) and is comparable with that of the
British Isles (3842, Fitter & Peat 2014). Summing up, the
phylogeographic pattern as represented on Fig. 7 did not
pose significant biological inconsistencies. By far the ma-
jor challenge was the necessity to implement the Linnaean
taxonomy and decide on how many nominal species are
there.
At this stage the purely practical limitations of available
material has to be mentioned. Mostly, specimens of Mo-
rimotodes g. n. are relatively rarely encountered. For ex-
ample, the radiation inhabiting the Cang Shan Mountain
Range responded well to the original sifting in 2008, how-
ever, DNA sequencing of the 2008 specimens resulted in
only short fragments of 407 bp (four specimens
#0499-0502). During the subsequent two visits to Cang
Shan in 2010 and 2012, a significant greater sampling ef-
fort resulted in the collection of only a single specimen
(#0867), but provided a full-length DNA barcode. Mount
Emei has also been visited three times with one month of
intense fieldwork in total. Among the 27 sifting samples,
only five contained representatives of Morimotodes g. n.
Four focussed samples were taken in two years within 50
meters from where the unique specimen #1105 (lineage
EM-C, Fig. 7) had been sifted, but 1 failed to discover ad-
ditional specimens. The entire lineage EM-A was recov-
ered from a single sample. Only the lineage EM-B was
detected in three samples, two of them taken in exactly
the same place in different years and the third one some
650 m away. Such sampling results strongly suggest that
specimens of the continental Morimotodes g. n. are most
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 123-147
©ZFMK
136
Vasily V. Grebennikov
unevenly distributed in time and across seemingly iden-
tical landscape of mountainous forest.
Species delimitation in insects often relies on the shape
of male genitalia. However, due to the scarcity of Mori-
motodes g. n. specimens coupled with possible structur-
al damages during dissection of the minute genitalia, I re-
frained to examine genitalia of all sequenced specimens.
It was impossible to sex specimens externally and, there-
fore, male genitalia dissection had to be attempted with a
randomly chosen specimen, some of them females. Even
more problematic were the difficulties linked to the me-
chanical body properties of these highly compact minute
beetles with globular elytra firmly fused to the hind body
and forming together a most robust, inflexible and, accord-
ingly, highly breakable capsule. After the muscle tissue
was nearly completely dissolved and the remaining inter-
nal structures much loosened, the genitalia were success-
fully dissected for the two holotypes, only. It was, there-
fore, judged inadvisable to perform extensive male gen-
italia dissections.
The practical conclusion reached after considering all
was to define preliminarily a single species for all conti-
nental representatives of Morimotodes g. n., even though
this taxon might be later split into more separate species.
The Haba Shan lineage having distinct external adult mor-
phology further corroborated by the unique biological
preferences of higher altitudes can perhaps merit its own
species even at present. This action, however, will render
the rest of the continental Morimotodes g. n. paraphylet-
ic and, therefore, is not implemented. Considering a like-
lihood of further taxonomic changes in the broadly defined
M. ismene sp. n., the type series is purposely restricted to
the specimens forming a separate lineage uniquely char-
acterised by DNAand geographical data. Specimens from
the Gaoligong Mountain Range forming the extreme west
of the known generic distribution (Fig. 9) were chosen for
this purpose, specifically because they are numerous in the
DNA analysis. Additionally, this lineage is represented by
specimens recovered in at least six separate samples tak-
en from the area measuring 25 km in its greatest dimen-
sion and, therefore, having the least chances of harbour-
ing an undetected sympatric congeneric lineage (i.e., like
Mount Emei with at least three such lineages). Conse-
quently, all specimens of M. ismene sp. n. from localities
other than the Gaoligong Mountain Range are not desig-
nated as paratypes.
Dated phylogeography of Morimotodes ismene g. & sp. n.
Little can be presently said about the temporal aspect of
Morimotodes g. n. evolution. The single and seemingly
most interesting aspect of it, namely the time of the im-
plied separation between continental M. ismene sp. n. and
M. polynices sp. n. from Taiwan cannot be addressed at
present because of the lack of mtDNA data to represent
the latter species. Even though all seven lineages consti-
tuting monophyletic M. ismene sp. n. were consistently re-
covered in the first (ML) and the second (BI) analyses,
their grouping was consistent in only three nodes (Fig. 8):
(a.) the split between lineages inhabiting Mount Haba and
Mount Gongga, (b.) their MCRA separating from the lin-
eage EM-A inhabiting Mount Emei and (c.) the split be-
tween Mount Emei clade EM-B and the lineage from the
Gaoligong Mt. Range. All four consistently recovered evo-
lutionary events (three aforementioned and the origin of
the entire M. ismene sp. n.) date 4.45 MY, 8.08 MY, 3.46
MY and 10.34 MY, respectively. These estimations pro-
vide a very approximate time frame for the origin and di-
versification of the continental Morimotodes g. n., which
is comparable to those of the sympartically distributed
weevil genera Niphadomimus Zherikhin, 1987 (Greben-
nikov 2014) and Notaris Gennar, 1817 (Grebennikov &
Kolov, unpublished) likely linked to the advanced stages
of the uplift of the Tibetan Plateau (Favre et al. 2014).
Illustrated overview of genera of the subtribes Molyti-
na and Plinthina
The catalog of Alonso-Zarazaga & Lyal ( 1 999, 2002) had
all genera currently assigned to Molytina and Plinthina al-
ready listed as such (except for two proposed later) and
all included in the broadly defined Molytini. Since then
the following changes were proposed: ( 1 ) the monotypic
Stenanchonus Voss, formerly of Anchonini, was syn-
onymized with Euthycus Pascoe of Molytina (Meregalli
2003); (2) some species of the genus Minyops Schoenherr
of Plinthina was assigned to the newly erected Paraminy-
ops Osella & Bello (Osella & Bello 2010); (3) the tribe
Sthereini was re-erected to incorporate nine genera, four
of them formerly of Plinthina (Alonso-Zarazaga 2013;
Lyal 2014); (4) the former Molytini subtribe Typoderini
was elevated to tribe level; (5) the former Molytini sub-
tribe Leiosomatina was synonymized with Molytina (Lyal
2014); (6) the former tribe Hylobiini was synonymized
with Molytini by forming its third and the last subtribe
(Lyal 2014); (7) one new genus, Morimotodes g. n., be-
ing described herein. Moreover, the Palaearctic represen-
tatives of both subtribes accounting for about 80% of their
species were recently catalogued (Alonso-Zarazaga 20 1 3).
All 30 genera presently assigned to both subtribes are
listed below and 27 of them are illustrated. This summa-
ry was done with the intention to bring them to the no-
tice of the contemporary scientific community and hope-
fully trigger their reinvestigation in a phylogenetic frame-
work using modem data and analytical methods. Up to
now very little of such work has been done for the entire
subfamily Molytinae, including both Molytina and Plinthi-
na. Most importantly, reciprocal monophyly of both sub-
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 123-147
©ZFMK
Morimotodes, a new weevil genus from China
137
tribes has never been demonstrated and, therefore, their
taxonomic existence as currently defined seems very pre-
carious yet. Moreover, with the exception of Craw’s
(1999) detailed analysis of the New Zealand’s Hadram-
phus & Lyperobius , none of the non-monotypical genera
shown in detail below has ever been tested for its mono-
phyly. Some phylogenetically relevant statements were,
however, made: Meregalli (1985) suggested a sister-group
relation between Minyops (then containing Paraminyops)
and Plinthus. Davidian (2008) proposed that the lineage
presently consisting of Paraminyops and Minyops is most
closely related to a subgroup of the genus Plinthus (ren-
dering the former paraphyletic) and that Hoplopteridius
forms a clade with all of them. Osella & Bello (2010),
when separating their new genus Paraminyops from Miny-
ops, suggested that both genera together with PIo-
plopteridius form a group (“subtribe Minyopina”, a syn-
onym of Plinthina, Bouchard et al. 2011 ). None of these
hypotheses have been analytically tested.
Subtribe Molytina
The tribe includes 13 genera, which are numbered and list-
ed alphabetically below. Nine of them, as noted by Lyal
(2014), are widely scattered from New Zealand and Aus-
tralia, through New Guinea, Borneo, Java, and Indochi-
na, to Sri Lanka, eastern India, China and Japan. Three
other genera ( Anisorhynchus , Leiosoma and Liparus) are
distributed in the Western Palaearctic, with the former al-
so known from Central Asia (Alonso-Zarazaga & Lyal
1999). One genus known only from the holotype (Ptero-
tomus) is restricted to Angola.
Anisorhynchus Sehoenherr, 1842 (Figs 10A, B). This is
a genus of 13 large-bodied species and one non-nomina-
tive subspecies restricted to the West Palaearctic and dis-
tributed mainly around the Mediterranean Sea (Alonso-
Zarazaga 2013).
Apterylobius Marshall, 1942 (Figs 10C, D). Fewer than
a dozen specimens of this genus are known, all exclusive-
ly from Mount Kinabalu in northern Borneo. Since its de-
scription (Marshall 1942), the genus contains two species
and one non-nominative subspecies, and no newly collect-
ed specimens have been since reported.
Carbonomassula Heller, 1908 (Figs 10E, F, 16A). Spec-
imens of this genus, apart from their much greater size,
markedly resemble those of Morimotodes g. n. in having
similarly evenly rounded and dorsally lustrous body of
reddish or brownish color (compare Figs 6A and 1 0E). The
genus contains the single species from Papua New Guinea,
C. glaberrima Heller, 1908. The original description was
based on an unknown number of syntypes and accompa-
nied by a high quality habitus drawing (Heller 1908). The
type locality is “Nova Guinea Britannica, ad flumen
Aroa”. Two syntypes are in MTD, the smaller one best fit-
ting the body length given in the original description is
illustrated herein (Figs 10E, F). Both syntypes have a blue
rectangular label “14523” (Fig. I6A), even though the
original description mentions “14525”. One additional and
seemingly conspecific specimen supplied to BMNH by
M.E. Bacchus in 1965 has the locality label “NEW
GINEA: Morobe Dist., Herzog Mts., Vagau, C.4,000 ft.
4-7.L1965”. No other specimens of this genus have been
reported (Set! iff 2007).
Clarkanthus Alonso-Zarazaga & Lyal, 1999 (Figs 10G,
H, 1 6B). This genus consists of two poorly known species
from Sri Lanka and the adjacent part of India. Its type
species, C. taprobanus (Faust, 1895) was described from
the holotype collected on “Ceylon". The genus has long
been known under a preoccupied generic name Ischno-
pus Faust, year (non Amyot). Second species, C.
madrasensis Pajni & Sood, 1982, was described from a
holotype collected in the South Indian state of Tamil Nadu
just across the Palk Strait from Sri Lanka. Except for the
two type specimens, representatives of the genus have not
been reported in the literature. Two additional historical
specimens are present in MTD: one seemingly conspecif-
ic with the type species and labelled “Ceylon Plason” in
Faust’s handwriting, and another at least congeneric and
with a printed label “India or. Madura”. The locality might
perhaps refer to the Madurai District in Tamil Nadu, which
is the type locality of C. madrasensis. These four speci-
mens are the sole representatives of this obscure genus.
Euthycus Pascoe, 1885 (Figs 11 A, B). This genus em-
braces 12 species distributed at the junction between the
Palaearctic and Oriental Regions and recorded from Japan,
southern China and Taiwan, southwards to Borneo and Ja-
va, and westwards to Assam, Sikkim and Andaman Islands
of India (Meregalli 2003). Little is known of their natu-
ral history, aside from appearing to be associated with mid-
altitude primary mountainous forests. Observation of two
live specimens personally collected by sifting litter in Tai-
wan and represented in the DNA analyses revealed re-
markably strong adhesive power of their tarsi. This sug-
gests that the beetles are climbers rather than true litter
inhabitants (such as Morimotodes g. n.), where they might
be encountered only accidently.
Hadramphus Broun, 1911 (Figs 1 1C, D). This genus in-
cludes four relatively large-bodied species restricted to
New Zealand and some nearby islands and was revised
by Craw (1999, including a summary on the immature
stages and host plants). Together with Lyperobius , this
genus can be considered as a weevd analogous to the moa
or weta (i.e., flightless giant birds or crickets), that evolved
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 123-147
©ZFMK
138
Vasily V. Grebennikov
*
1
Fig. 10. Representatives of the Molytini: Molytina genera. A-B: Anisorhynchus barbatus (Rossi), Italy, Abruzzo, no date, no col-
lector, type species of Anisorhynchus , MTD; C-D: Apterylobius basalis (Heller, 1922), Malaysia, Borneo, no date, no collector,
?syntype, MTD; E-F: Carbonomassula glaberrima Heller, Papua New Guinea, syntype, see text, type species of Carbonomassu-
Icy MTD; G- H: Clarkanthus taprobanus (Faust), Sri Lanka, holotype, see text, type species of Clarkanthus , MTD.
in the unique New Zealand biota mostly deprived of ter- species quickly driven to extinction by invasive humans,
restrial mammals and, therefore, highly vulnerable to in- all but one ( Tymbopiptus valeas Kuschel, 1987) known
vasive predatory species. Unlike the moa with all nine large New Zealand weevils continue to survive, despite
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 123-147
©ZFMK
Morimotodes, a new weevil genus from China
139
Fig. 11. Representatives of the Molytini: Molytina genera. A-B: Euthycus macilentus Pascoe, 1885, Indonesia, Java, Mt. Guntur,
no date. Overbeck, type species of Euthycus, MTD; C-D: Hadramphus tuberculatus (Pascoe), New Zealand, Christchurch, 1910,
no collector, BMNH. image: Vasily Grebennikov, © The Natural History Museum, London; E-F: Leiosoma deflexion (Panzer, 1 795),
Poland, Muszkowice, 6.V.1986, M.Wanat, type species of Leiosoma , CNC; G-H: Lipams glabrirostris (Kiistcr, 1849), Poland, Sudetes,
1 5.vii. 1 975, M.Kupczynski, CNC.
loosing most of their former range (Kuschel & Worthy
1996). Recently an extant population of H. tuberculatus
(Pascoe, 1877), a species thought to be extinct, was dis-
covered (Fountain et al. 2013).
Kyliparus Moromoto, 1982 (not illustrated). This genus
was proposed to accommodate a single species from
Japan, K. lewisii (Roelofs), previously attributed to Li-
parus. The original description of Kiliparus contains a
habitus dorsal image of a single female studied by Mori-
moto (1982, fig. 46E).
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 123-147
©ZFMK
140
Vasily V. Grebennikov
Leiosoma Stephens, 1829 (Figs 11H, F). All 32 species
and one non-nominative subspecies of this genus are re-
stricted to the West Palaearctic, particularly the northern
Mediterranean, with two species extended eastwards to the
Caucasus (Alonso-Zarazaga 2013). Numerous species de-
scriptions were made for localized allopatric populations
and, therefore, a revision is desirable to assess their sta-
tus as that of biologically valid entities.
Liparus Olivier, 1807 (Figs 1 1 G, FI), the type genus of
the subtribe Molytina, the tribe Molytini and the subfam-
ily Molytinae. The genus includes 1 7 species and two non-
nominative subspecies (Alonso-Zarazaga 2014) of large-
bodied weevils. The genus is most diverse in the West
Palaearctic, while two species of the subgenus Li-
parorhynchus Reitter form the extreme eastward bound-
ary of the generic distribution and are found in Central
Asia (Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Afghanistan, Iran; Bajtenov
1974; Alonso-Zarazaga 2013).
Lyperobius Pascoe, 1876 (Figs 12A, B). Along with
Hadramphus, Lyperobius is another genus of large-bod-
ied and flightless weevils endemic to New Zealand. The
majority of its 1 6 species have highly restricted distribu-
tions due to human-induced habitat changes, including
predation by introduced rodents (Craw 1999).
Morimotodes g. n. (Figs 1-9). The genus includes two
small-bodied litter species from Southwestern China and
Taiwan, respectively, and is a sister to the West Palaeaerc-
tic Leiosoma. See the taxonomic comments above.
Pinacopus Marshall, 1932 (Figs 12C, D). This genus has
14 named species found in Malaysia (8 spp.), Thailand ( 1
sp. ), Laos (4 spp.) and northern India ( 1 sp.), with at least
some specimens “collected from shrubs, which are more
or less covered with lichens, by beating method” (Koji-
ma 2010).
Pterotomus Quedenfeldt, 1888 (Figs 12E, F, 16C). The
genus includes a single species, P. moebiusi Quedenfeldt,
1888, known from the holotype collected in Angola’s
province Malange and never reported since. The original
description included a high quality habitus drawing (Que-
denfeldt 1888).
Subtribe Plinthina
The subtribe Plinthina consists of 17 genera listed below.
Eleven of them are restricted to the Mediterranean region
and some, like Minyops, are also found in Central Europe,
Ukraine, southern Russia and western Kazakhstan. Two
genera, Kurilio and Metahylobius, with a total of three
species are limited to the eastern Pacific (Ffonshu,
Flokkaido and Kunashir). Four other inadequately known
mono- and oligotypic genera are restricted to the Afrotrop-
ical Region, namely Seychelles ( Gonotrachelus ), East
Africa ( Molytophilus and Plinthinella ) and Madagascar
( Vouauxia).
Adexius Schoenherr, 1834 (Figs 13A, B). This genus con-
sists of three West Palaearctic species, two of them poor-
ly known and narrowly distributed. The third one, A. scro-
bipennis Gyllenhal, 1834 is found in forest leaf litter in
most of Central and Southern Europe between Belgium
and Ukraine (Alonso-Zarazaga 2013).
Alloplinthus Solari, 1941 (Figs 13C, D). This genus con-
sists of three species (originally described as Plinthus)
from Tenerife and Gran Canaria (Alonso-Zarazaga 2013).
Caulomorphus Faust, 1886 (Figs 13E, F). The genus con-
tains 1 1 eyeless species from Turkey, Greece, Iran and
Azerbaijan (Alonso-Zarazaga 2013). Osclla (1970) revised
the genus taxonomically and later described three more
species.
Freyianus Zumpt, 1932 (Figs 13G, H). This is a
monobasic genus for F liparoides Zumpt, 1932. It was de-
scribed based on 10 syntypes (one of them adequately il-
lustrated by a habitus photo) collected by “Kulzer” in “Ak-
Schehir” (Zumpt 1932) and thought to be in Turkey (Alon-
so-Zarazaga & Lyal 1999). Since its description, this genus
has not been reported in the original literature and its iden-
tity is inadequately known. The newly imaged specimen
(Figs 13G, H), even if labelled as a “holotype”, is in fact
a syntype and, together with two other syntypes, is stored
in NHMB.
Gonotrachelus Champion, 1914 (Figs 131, J, 16D). The
genus includes a single species, G. quinquecarinatus
Champion, 1914 described from two syntypes found on
the Seychelles (Long Island, near Mahe). An additional
specimen of this species was reported from Madagascar
(Hustache 1925). The genus is characterized by the funi-
cle consisting of fine antennomeres (Champion 1914, figs
11, lib) and was originally compared with Stypldoderes
Wollaston (Typoderini). The type series (presently in
BMNFI) was taken from seashores and was thought to be
introduced via driftwood (Champion 1914).
Hoplopteridius K. Daniel, 1908 (Figs 14A, B). This genus
consists of five species and three non-nominative sub-
species distributed in the northern and eastern Mediter-
ranean (Alonso-Zarazaga 2013).
Iberoplinthus Meregalli, 1986 (Figs 14C, D). This recent-
ly erected genus (Meregalli 1986) consists of six species
(Alonso-Zarazaga 2013) all found in northern Spain, while
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 123-147
©ZFMK
Morimotodes, a new weevil genus from China
141
Fig. 12. Representatives of the Molytini: Molytina genera. A-B: Lyperobius huttoni Pascoe, 1876, New Zealand, Humboldt Mts.,
30.xii. 1 944, C.E. Clarke, type species of Lyperobius , BMNH, image: Vasily Grebennikov, © The Natural History Museum, Lon-
don; C-D: Pinacopus dentirostris Marshal, 1932, Malaysia, Perak, no date, no collector, MTD; E-F: Pterotomus moebiusi Que-
denfeldt, Angola, holotype, see text, type species of Pterotomus , MNHN.
the type species, I. imbricatus (Dufur, 1851), and is re-
ported also from Andorra and southern France.
Kurilio Zherikhin & Egorov, 1991 (Figs 14E, F). Its on-
ly species, K. monachus Zherikhin & Egorov, 1 99 1 , is re-
stricted to Hokkaido and Kunashir Islands (Zherikhin &
Egorov 1990).
Metahylobius Nakane, 1964 (Figs 14G, H). This genus
consists of two species, both restricted to the alpine zone
of Honshu: M.jonensis Nakane, 1964 and M. rubiginosus
Morimoto, 1982. The adults of the former species “were
captured by turning stones on the ground” (Morimoto
1982).
Minyops Schoenherr, 1823 (Figs 141, J). This genus con-
sists of 29 species and two non-nominative subspecies dis-
tributed through most of southern Europe and also Turkey
(Alonso-Zarazaga 2013). The genus was recently taxo-
nomically revised with 22 of its 3 1 species-group taxa de-
scribed as new and eight others re-validated from syn-
onymy (Osella & Bello 2010).
Mitoplinthus Reitter, 1897 (Figs 15 A, B). This genus con-
sists of two species and one non-nominative subspecies
of somewhat cylindrical medium-sized weevils distributed
in southern parts of Europe between Spain and Ukraine.
Meregalli (1986) provided the most recent treatment of
the genus.
Molytophilus Hartmann, 1904 (Figs 15C, D). The genus
consists of three species, the type species Molytophilus
carinatus Hartmann, 1904, described from Tanzania, and
two more from Ethiopia: M. affinis Hustache, 1936, and
M. puncticollis Hustache, 1936, whose affinities with the
genus have not yet been demonstrated.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 123-147
©ZFMK
142
Vasily V. Grebennikov
Fig. 13. Representatives of the Molytini: Plinthinae genera. A-B: Adexius scrobipennis Gyllenhal, Poland, Holubla ad Przemysl,
4.vi,1997, M.Wanat, type species of Adexius, CNC; C-D: Alloplinthus musicus (Wollaston, 1860), Spain, Teneriffe, 1 7.V.1924, E.Ap-
penhagen, type species of Alloplinthus, BMF1N, image: Vasily Grebennikov, ©The Natural History Museum, London; E-F: Caulo-
morphus lederi (Chevrolat, 1880), Georgia, “Meskisch. Gb.”, no date, H.Leder, ?syntype, type species of Caulomorphus , MTD;
G-H: Freyianus liparoides Zumpt, Turkey, “Ak-Schehir”, 22.V.1926, Kulzer, syntype, type species of Freyianus, NHMB; 1 -J: Gono-
trachelus quinquecarinatus Champion, Seychelles, see text, syntype, type species of Gonotrachelus, BMNH, image: Vasily Greben-
nikov, © The Natural History Museum, London.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 123-147 ©ZFMK
Morimotodes, a new weevil genus from China
143
Fig. 14. Representatives of the Molytini: Plinthinae genera. A-B: Hoplopteridins lutosus (Frivaldszky, 1835) Italy, Rom, no date,
no collector, type species of Hoplopteridius , MTD; C-D: Iberoplinthus curvirostris Meregalli, 1986 Spain, Asturias, 1 4.vii. 1 986,
M.Meregalli, paratype, BMNH, image: Vasily Grebennikov, © The Natural History Museum, London; E-F: Kurilio monachus
Zherikhin & Egorov, Russia, Kunashir Isl., 1 6.ix. 1 975, no collector, type species of Kurilio , CNC; G-H: Metahylobius jonensis
Nakane, Japan, Honshu Isl., 1 .vii. 1 986, S.J. Martin, type species of Metahylobius , BMNH, image: Vasily Grebennikov, © The Nat-
ural History Museum, London; 1 J: Minyops carinatus (Linnaeus, 1767), Austria, Wien, no date, no collector, type species of Miny-
ops , MTD.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 123-147
©ZFMK
144
Vasily V. Grebennikov
Fig. 15. Representatives of the Molytini: Plinthinae genera. A-B: Mitoplinthus caliginosus (Fabricius, 1775), Germany, Amstadt,
16.x. 1949, W.Liebmann, MTD; C-D: Molytophilus carinatus Hartmann, Tanzania, Usambara, no date, no collector, syntype, type
species of Molytophilus, MTD; E-F: Neoplinthus tigratus porculus (Fabricius, 1801 ), Austria, Graz, no date, no collector, MTD;
G-H: Plinthus confiusus Meregalli, 1985, Russia, Caucasus, 21. vi. 1974, J.Vorisek, paratype, CNC; I-J: Vouauxia onopatroidea Hus-
tache, Madagascar, see text, syntype, type species of Vouauxia , MNITN.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 123-147
©ZFMK
Morimotodes, a new weevil genus from China
145
Q’L.H'.'tyw.lA,
j>. Vivjk*
Stoatl. Museum fur
Tierkunde. Dresden
'JU SMer
TijJurV
(JoH, J. Fausts
Ankauf 1900-
u u~i
{afrtd> 'f*uu6
t f-titctl-
Sf). figured.
MUSfeUM PARIS
IX ^ullSSevv&l it
COU '« QBE fl T HUR
I 4 vrvCo
cr\\\A+,ti
n .yvn j
«4a<> c4
&
Stoat!. M
Tlerkunde.Drasden
. \At(x£cl'X4C (SUi
ur.eurn fur ' ' I!
?eyt helle Islands.
P^rcy Sladen
Trust Expedition.
1913.— 170.
Tr.Linn.S.L 1914.
Goifotrachelus !
D^CQniuituSj Cli.
n
frialat,
MUSEUM PARIS
MADAGASCAR
Collection Uon Fairmaire
1906
COTYPE
Yo
U~iMAOC>VCL*
^o/usch-aiclta
Hwt.
MUSEUM PARIS
c 1949
Col. A. HUSTACHE
Fig. 16. Type specimen labels. A: Carbonomassida glaberrima Heller, ST; B: Clarkanthus taprobanus (Faust), holotype; C: Ptero-
tomus moebiusi Quedenfeldt, holotype; D; Gonotrachelus quinquecarinatus Champion, syntype, image: Vasily Grebennikov,
© The Natural History Museum, London; E: Vouauxia onopatroidea Hustache, syntype. Labels within each species are of propor-
tional size; habitus images are not to scale.
Neoplinthus Bedel, 1884 (Figs I5E, F). This genus in-
cludes five species and two non-nominative subspecies of
elongated and parallel-sided weevils distributed in Cen-
tral, Eastern and Southern Europe; all of them recorded
from Italy (Alonso-Zarazaga 2013).
Paraminyops Osella & Bello, 2010 (not illustrated). This
genus was recently separated from Minyops by Osella &
Bello (2010) to accommodate nine species and two non-
nominative subspecies from northern and eastern Mediter-
ranean.
Plinthinella Hofmann, 1965 (not illustrated). This genus
includes its sole member, the type species by original des-
ignation P. tenella Hoffmann, 1965. This is a small bee-
tle of some 2. 0-2. 2 mm in body length and funicle with
seven antennomeres described from the holotype and 12
paratypes collected in 1962 by Herbert Frantz. The type
locality in “Tanganyika: Kilimandjaro” (= Mt. Kiliman-
jaro in Tanzania) and the altitude is unknown. When de-
scribed, this taxon was compared with Matxaldiella
glacialis (Hustache, 1929) (cited as “ Mimus glacialis ”)
from Mount Kenya in Kenya (depicted in Hustache 1929:
fig. 15). Since its description, Plinthinella tenella has not
been reported in the original literature and its identity is
inadequately known. The curatorial search to locate the
type series in NMW failed, while my extensive recent
sampling in the type locality did not rediscover the species.
Both the generic and species names should, therefore, be
considered as nomina dubia.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 123-147
Plinthus Gerinar, 1817 (Figs 15G, H). This genus in-
cludes 68 species and 17 non-nominative subspecies of
medium- to large-bodied weevils widely distributed in the
West Palaearctic. The majority of species are found in
mountains between the Pyrenees and Alborz in northern
Iran (Alonso-Zarazaga 2013). The Caucasus appears to
have disproportionally large number of species normally
restricted to alpine mountaintops. This is one of a few gen-
era receiving significant attention in recent years, includ-
ing detailed (although mainly unpublished) studies on in-
ternal classification, structure of male genitalia, species
distribution and biology (Davidian 2008).
Vouauxia Hustache, 1920 (Figs 151, J, I6E). The genus
includes a single species, O. onopatroidea Hustache, 1920,
described from Madagascar from unknown number of
syntypes. The original brief description (Hustache 1920)
was followed by a more detailed one (Hustache 1925),
both relating this taxon to Gonotrachelus Champion. At
least three syntype are present in MNHN. No other spec-
imens of this genus have been reported in the literature.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
This review revealed, how little is actually known about
wingless Molytinae genera, especially those, which are
presently assigned to the subtribes Molytina and Plinthi-
na. The discovery of a peculiar new genus from China
strongly suggests that similar findings still remain to be
made, especially using specialized collecting techniques
©ZFMK
146
Vasily V. Grebennikov
and addressing specific habitats harbouring cryptic and
small-sized organisms. Equally remarkable is the acute
scarcity of data on the ma jority of other genera herein dis-
cussed. In many cases species and even genera were men-
tioned only once when formally described. Many mono-
and oligobasic genera such as Apteiylobius, Carbonomas-
sula, Clarkanthus, Kyliparus, Pterotomus , Freyianus ,
Gonotrachehis , Molytophilus , Plinthinella and Vouauxia
are particularly poorly known and at least some of them
appear only distantly related to the type genera of their
respective subtribes. A detailed morphological and, par-
ticularly, DNA analysis of Molytinae is indeed long over-
due. Much remains to be done with wingless Molytinae
weevils and hopefully this paper helps to reinforce this
seemingly self-evident conclusion.
Acknowledgement. Ales Smetana collected all specimens of
Morimotodes polynices g. & sp. n. in Taiwan. Curators of the
collections mentioned above variously helped in accessing spec-
imens under their care. Genrikh Ed. Davidian (St. Petersburg,
Russia) identified the sequenced specimens of Plinthus. Marek
Wanat (Wroclaw, Poland) sent imaged specimens of Adexius, Li-
parus and Leiosoma. Eva Sprecher contacted on my behalf Is-
abelle Ziircher-Pfander (both Basel, Switzerland), who counted
syntypes and took images of Freyianus liparoides (Figs 1 3G, H).
Thierry Deuve (Paris, France) sent a reprint of Hustache (1920).
Bradley J. Sinclair and Eduard Jendek (both Ottawa, Canada)
read an early draft of this work.
REFERENCES
Alonso-Zarazaga MA(2013) Molytinae. Pp. 475^197 in: Lobl
I & Smetana A (eds.) Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, Vol-
ume 8, Curculionoidea II. Brill, Leiden
Alonso-Zarazaga MA, Lyal C'HC (1999) A world catalogue of
families and genera of Curculionoidea (Insecta: Coleoptera)
(excepting Scolytidae and Platypodidae). Entomopraxis,
Barcelona
Alonso-Zarazaga MA, Lyal CHC (2002) Addenda and corrigen-
da to “A World Catalogue of Families and Genera of Cur-
culionoidea (Insecta: Coleoptera)”. Zootaxa 63: 1-37
Bajtenov MS (1974) Zhuki-dolgonosiki (Coleoptera: Attelabidae,
Cucrulionidae) Srednej Azii i Kazakhstana Illjustrirovannyj
OpredeliteF Rodov i Katalog Vidov. Izdatel’stvo Nauka Kaza-
khskoy SSR, Alma-Ata
Bouchard P, Bousquet Y, Davies AE, Alonso-Zarazaga MA,
Lawrence JF, Lyal CHC, Newton AF, Reid CAM, Schmitt M,
Slipinski SA, Smith ABT (2011) Family-group names in
Coleoptera (Insecta). ZooKeys 88: 1-972
Champion GC (1914) Reports on the Percy Sladen Trust expe-
dition to the Indian Ocean in 1905, under the leadership of
Mr. J. Stanley Gardiner, M.A. No. XIX. Coleoptera,
Curoulionidae. Transactions of the Linnean Society London
16: 393-497
Cohen KM, Finney S, Gibbard PL (201 3) International Chronos-
tratigraphic Chart, International Commission on Stratigraphy.
Online at http://www.stratigraphy.org/ICSchart/Chronos-
tratChart2013-01.pdf last accessed March 12 2014
Craw RC (1999) Molytini (Insecta: Coleoptera: Curculionidae:
Molytinae). Fauna of New Zealand, 39. Manaaki Whenua
Press, Lincoln
Davidian GE (2008) Weevils of the genus Plinthus Genu.
(Coleoptera, Curculionidae) from the Caucasus. Autoreferat
of unpublished PhD Thesis, 19 pp. [in Russian]
Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambaut A (2012)
Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7.
Molecular Biology and Evolution 29: 1969-1973
Faust J (1895) Russelkafer der alten und neuen Welt. Stettiner
Entomologische Zeitung 55: 140-160
Favre A, Packert M, Pauls SU, Jahnig SC, Uhl D, Michalak I,
Muellner-Riehl AN (2014) The role of the uplift of the Qing-
hai-Tibetan Plateau for the evolution of Tibetan biotas. Bio-
logical Reviews doi: 10.1 1 1 1/brv. 12107
Fitter AH, Peat HJ (2014) Ecological Flora of the British Isles.
Online at http://www.ecotlora.co.uk last accessed 2 July 2,
2014
Fountain ED, Wiseman BH, Cruickshank RH, Paterson AM
(2013) The ecology and conservation of Hadramphus tuber-
culatus (Pascoe 1877) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Molytinae).
Journal of Insect Conservation 17: 737-745
Grebennikov VV (2014) DNA barcode and phylogeography of
six new high altitude wingless Niphadomimus (Coleoptera:
Curculionidae: Molytinae) from Southwest China. Zootaxa
3838: 151-173
Grebennikov VV, Heiss E (2014) DNA barcoding of flat bugs
(Insecta: Hemiptera: Aradidae) with phylogenetic implications.
Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 72: 213-219
Grebennikov VV, Pham H.T. (2014) First record of Otibazo
(Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Molytinae) outside of Japan, with
description of a new species from Vietnam. Zootaxa 3869:
597-600.
Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard, JR (2003) Biolo-
gical identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of
the Royal Society B, 270: 313-321
Heller KM (1908) Viertel Beitrag zur Papuanischen Kaferfau-
na. Abhandlungen und Berichte des Koiiigl. Zoologischen und
Anthropologisch-Etnographischen Museums zu Dresden 12:
1-33+pl
Hoffmann A (1965) Curculionides nouveaux du Tanganyika
[Col.]. Annales de la Societe entomologique de France, Nou-
velle serie 1: 393-409
Hustache A ( 1 920) Diagnoses abregees de Curculionides de Ma-
dagascar. L’Echange 36(398): 1M
Hustache A (1925) Synopsis des Cuculionides de Madagascar.
Bulletin de FAcademie Malagache, Nouvelle Serie 7 (1924):
1-582
Hustache A (1929) Insectes Coleopteres XIX Curculionidae. Pp.
366-560, plates X, XI in: Voyage de Ch. Alluaud et R. Jean-
nel en Afrque Orientale (1911-1912). Resultats scientifique.
Librarie P. Lechevallier, Paris
Kojima H (2010) Weevils of the genus Pinacopus (Coleoptera,
Curculionidae) from Laos. Elytra 38: 151-160
Kuschel G (1987) The subfamily Molytinae (Coleoptera: Cur-
culionidae): general notes and descriptions of new taxa from
New Zealand and Chile. New Zealand Entomologist 9: 1 1-29
Kuschel G, Worthy TH (1996) Past distribution of large wee-
vils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in the South Island, New
Zealand, based on Holocene fossil remains. New Zealand En-
tomologist 19: 15-22
Lyal CH (2014) 3.7.7 Molytinae Schoenherr, 1823. Pp. 529-570
in: Leschen RAB & Beutel RG (eds.) Handbook of Zoology,
Arthropoda: Insecta: Coleoptera. Volume 3: Morphology and
Systematics (Phytophaga). Walter de Gruyter, Berlin
Maddison DR (2012) Phylogeny of Bembidion and related
ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Trechinae: Bembidi-
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 123-147
©ZFMK
Morimotodes , a new weevil genus from China
147
ini: Bembidiina). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 63:
533-576
Marshall GAK ( 1942). New Malaysian Hylobiinae (Col., Cur-
cul.). Annals & Magazine of Natural History, Series 11 9:
370-390
McKenna DD, Sequeira AS, Marvaldi AE, Farrell BD (2009)
Temporal lags and overlap in the diversification of weevils and
flowering plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci-
ences USA 106: 7083-7088
Meregalli M (1985) Revisione del genere Plinthus Germar
(Coleoptere: Curculionidae). Memorie del Museo Civico di
Storia Naturale di Verona, IIA Serie, Sezione Scienze della Vi-
ta, Supplement 5, 1-133
Meregalli M ( 1986) Iberoplintlnis, n. gen. di Plinthini e note sul
genere Mitoplinthus Reitter, 1897 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae:
Hylobiinae) (5 contributo alia conoscenza dei Curculionidi
della Penisola Iberica). Bollettino del Museo Regionale di
Scienze Naturali (Torino) 4: 489-522
Meregalli M (2003) Stenanchonus Voss 1937, a junior synonym
of Euthycus Pascoe 1885 (Insecta, Coleoptera, Curculionidae,
Molytinae). Senckenbergiana Biologica 82: 1-7
Morimoto K (1982). The family Curculionidae of Japan. I. Sub-
family Hylobiinae. Essakia 19: 51-121
Mosquin T, Whiting PG, McAllister DE ( 1995) Canada’s bio-
diversity: the variety of life, its status, economic benefits, con-
servation costs and unmet needs. Canadian Museum of nature,
Ottawa
Osella G ( 1 970) Revisione del genere Caulomorphus Faust e de-
scrizione di cinque nuove specie delle regioni montuose del-
la Turchia lungo il Mar Nero (Coleoptera, Curculionidae).
Memorie del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona
17(1969): 359-395
Osella G, Bello C (2010) Revisione di Minyops Schoenherr e
Paraminyops nov. gen. (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Molyti-
nae). Memorie del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona,
2. serie, Sezione Scienze della Vita 19: 3-133
Pajni HR, Sood S (1982) First record of genera Niphadonyx Dal-
la Torre and Ischnopus Fst. and description of two new species
from India (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Hylobiinae). Journal
of the Bombay Natural History Society 79: 363-369
Papadopoulou A, Anastasiou I, Vogler AP (2010) Revisiting the
insect mitochondrial molecular clock: the mid-Aegean trench
calibration. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27: 1659-1672
Peck SB (1990) Eyeless Arthropods of the Galapagos Island,
Ecuador: composition and origin of the cryptozoic fauna of
a young, tropical oceanic archipelago. Biotropica 22: 366-38 1
Quedenfcldt G (1888) Verzeichniss der von Herrn Major a.D.
von Mechow in Angola und am Quango-Strom 1878-1881
gesammelten Curculioniden und Brenthiden. Berliner Ento-
mologische Zeitschrift 32: 271-308+pl
Rambaut A (2013) FigTree, version 1.4. Online at
http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ last accessed March
12, 2014
Raxworthy CJ, Forstner MRJ, Nussbaum RA (2002) Chameleon
radiation by oceanic dispersal. Nature 415: 784-787
Setliff, G.P. (2007) Annotated checklist of weevils from the
Papuan region (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea). Zootaxa 1536:
1-296
Shorthouse DP (2010) SimpleMappr, an online tool to produce
publication-quality point maps. Online at http://www.sim-
plemappr.net last accessed May 12, 2014
Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Steelier G, Nei M, Kumar
S (201 1 ) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis
using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Max-
imum Parsimony Methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution
28: 2731-2739
Wanat M (2007) Alignment and homology of male terminalia
in Curculionoidea and other Coleoptera. Invertebrate System-
atics 21: 147-171
Wang L. Liao W, Chen C, Fan Q (2013) The seed plant flora of
the Mount Jinggangshan Region, Southeastern China. PLoS
ONE 8(9): e75834^
Zherikhin VV, Egorov AB (1990) Zhuki-dolgonosiki
(Coleoptera, Curculionoidea) dal’nego vostoka SSSR (obzor
podsemejstv s opisaniem novykh taksonov). Akademija
Nauk SSSR, Dal’nevostochnoe Otdelenie, Biologo-Pochven-
nyj Institut, Vladivostok.
Zumpt F (1932) Curculioniden - Studien IV. (Col.) Drei neue
Kaferarten aus Kleinasien. Mitteilungen der Deutschen En-
tomologischen Gesellschaft 3: 87-94
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 123-147
©ZFMK
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 148-156
December 20 1 4
New records of amphibians and reptiles from southern Vietnam
Truong Quang Nguyen12, Trung My Phung3, Nicole Schneider4, Andreas Botov4, Dao Thi Anh Tran5,6
& Thomas Ziegler4*
' Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Hanoi,
Vietnam; E-mail: nqt2@yahoo.com
' Department of Terrestrial Ecology, Zoological Institute, University of Cologne, Ziilpicher Strasse 47b,
D-50674 Cologne, Germany
3 Dong Khoi 9 A, Tam Hiep, Bien Hoa, Dong Nai Province, Vietnam; E-mail: pmytnmg@yahoo.com
4 AG Zoologischer Garten Koln, Riehler Strasse 173, D-50735 Cologne, Germany
3 Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, University of Science, Faculty of Biology, 227 Nguyen Van Cu, District 5,
HCM city, Vietnam ; E-mail: ttadao.hcmuns@gmail.com
6 Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenaueralle 160, D-53113 Bonn, Germany
' corresponding author: E-mail: ziegler@koelnerzoo.de
Abstract. We report six new records of poorly known species of amphibians and reptiles on the basis of a new herpeto-
logical collection from southern Vietnam: Ophryophryne gerti and Raorchestes gryllus from Khanh Hoa Province, Acan-
thosaura coronata from Ba Ria - Vung Tau Province, Gekko grossmanni from Ninh Thuan Province, as well as Cylin-
drophis ruffus and Oligodon cinereus pallidocinctus from Binh Phuoc Province.
Keywords. Ophryophiyne gerti , Raorchestes giyllus, Acanthosaura coronata, Gekko grossmanni, Cylindrophis ruffus,
Oligodon cinereus pallidocinctus, new records, taxonomy.
INTRODUCTION
Geographic distribution records are crucial for assessing
the conservation status and are also evidence to elucidate
species’ evolution and biology. Based on newly collect-
ed specimens of amphibians and reptiles from southern
Vietnam, we herein report six new records of poorly
known species, comprising two anuran species from
Khanh Hoa Province, one agamid species from Ba Ria -
Vung Tau, one geckonid species from Ninh Thuan
Province as well as one cylindrophiid and one colubrid
species from Binh Phuoc Province.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Field work was conducted by Trung My Phung in Hon Ba
Nature Reserve (Khanh Hoa Province) in July 2010, on
Nui Dinh Mountain (Ba Ria -Vung Tau Province) in No-
vember 2008, in Ca Na forest (Ninh Thuan Province) in
March 2010 and by Trung My Phung and Thang Huu
Khuong in Bu Gia Map National Park in September and
October 201 1 (Fig. 1). After taking photographs, speci-
mens were anaesthetized, fixed in 80-85% ethanol and
subsequently stored in 70% ethanol. Specimens were de-
posited in the collections of the Institute of Ecology and
Biological Resources (1EBR) and Vietnam National Mu-
seum of Nature (VNMN), Hanoi, Vietnam and the Zool-
ogisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig (ZFMK),
Bonn, Germany.
Received: 07.02.2013
Accepted: 25.1 1.2014
Measurements of specimens were taken with a digital
caliper to the nearest 0. 1 mm. Abbreviation are as follows:
SVL (snout-vent length): from tip of snout to anterior mar-
gin of cloacal; TaL (Tail length): from posterior margin
ofcloacal to tip of tail; TL (total length): SVL + TaL. Ter-
minology of morphological characters followed Nguyen
et al. (2012) for amphibians (except for forearm length,
FAL: from axilla to elbow and hand length, HAL: from
base of outer palmar tubercle to tip of finger III), Phung
& Ziegler (2011) for lizards, and David et al. (2012) for
snakes.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Taxonomic accounts
Megophryidae
Ophryophryne gerti Ollier, 2003
Gerti’s Mountain Toad / Coc nui got (Fig. 2)
Specimens examined: VNMN 983 and ZFMK 94220,
males, collected by T. M. Phung on 4 July 2010 from Hon
Ba Nature Reserve (ca. I2°10’N, 109°02’E), Dien Khanh
District, Khanh Hoa Province.
Corresponding editor: T. Ziegler
New herpetofaunal records from Vietnam
149
Fig. 1. Map of sampling sites in southern Vietnam: 1 ) Khanh
Hoa Province, 2) Ninh Thuan Province, 3) Binh Phuoc
Province, 4) Ba Ria - Vung Tau Province.
Morphological characters: Size small, SVL 28.2-29.7
mm (n = 2); head wider than long (HW 8. 5-8. 9 mm, HL
8. 1-8.7 mm); snout truncate, protruding, shorter than hor-
izontal diameter of eye (SL 2. 6-2. 7 mm, ED 3. 2-3. 7 mm);
canthus rostralis rounded, loreal region convex; interor-
bital distance narrower than upper eyelid and internarial
distance (IOD 4. 0-4. 3 mm, UEW 2. 6-2. 7 mm, IND
2. 5-2. 7 mm); nostrils closer to the eye than to the tip of
snout (EN 1.1-1. 4 mm, SN 1.2-1. 5 mm); pupil rounded;
tympanum oval, greater than half eye diameter and tym-
panum-eye distance (TD 1 .8-2.3 mm, TYE 1 .5-1.9 mm);
supratympanic fold distinct; vomerine teeth absent;
tongue rounded posteriorly.
Forelimbs: FAL 6. 5-7.4 mm, HAL 7. 5-7. 6 mm; fingers
free of webbing, relative length of fingers: I<II=IV<III;
tips of fingers rounded, without discs; dermal fringe along
outer finger absent; subarticular tubercles absent; palmar
tubercles indistinct. Hindlimbs: femur longer than tibia and
foot length (FML 15.3-18.7 mm, TBL 14.9-15.2 mm,
FTL 12.7-13.3 mm); toes long and thin, relative length
of toes: I<II<V<III<IV; tips of toes rounded; webbing
basal; dermal fringe along outer toe absent; subarticular
tubercles absent; inner metatarsal tubercle small (1MT
1.4- 1.5 mm), outer metatarsal tubercle absent, tarsal fold
absent.
Dorsal skin of head, body and limbs granular; dorsum
with several skin ridges, forming a X-shape in the mid-
dle and two other ridges running from behind tympanum
to posterior part of back; lateral sides of head and flank
granular, upper part of flank with some glandular warts;
orbital horn pointed; dorsolateral fold absent; throat, chest,
belly and ventral surface of limbs smooth; pectoral and
femoral glands present, small.
Coloration in life: Dorsal surface of head and body dark
brown; a dark triangular pattern between eyes present;
lower part of flank with some dark brown spots; lateral
side of head dark brown; dorsal surface of limbs with dark
bars; throat, chest, belly and ventral surface of limbs dark
brown with some black spots.
Remarks: Moqrhological characters of our specimens
agreed well with the description of Ohler (2003) but they
are a little smaller than the type series (SVL 28.2-29.7 mm
vs. 32.0-45.8 mm).
Distribution: In Vietnam, this species is known from
Thua Thien - Hue Province southward to Lam Dong
Province. Elsewhere, this species has been reported from
Laos (Nguyen et al. 2009).
Rhacophoridae
Raorchestes gryllus (Smith, 1924)
Langbian Bubble-nest Frog / Nhai cay Langbian (Fig. 3)
Specimens examined: VNMN 985 (adult female), VN-
MN 986 and ZFMK 94221-94222 (adult males), collect-
ed by T. M. Phung on 4 July 2010 from Hon Ba Nature
Reserve (ca. 12°10’N, 109°02’E), Dien Khanh District,
Khanh Hoa Province.
Morphological characters: Size small, SVL 21.9-24.2
mm (n = 4), head as long as wide (HL 9. 2-9. 8 mm, HW
9.2-9. 8 mm); snout pointed in dorsal view, a bit longer
than horizontal diameter of eye (SL 3.6-4. 1 mm, ED
3. 1-3.5 mm); canthus rostralis distinct; interorbital dis-
tance wider than internarial distance and upper eyelid
(IOD 24-2.7 mm, IND 1 .7-2.0 mm, UEW 2.3-2.4mm);
nostril lateral, rounded, nearly midway between tip of
snout and eye (SN 1.6-1. 8 mm); vomerine teeth absent;
tympanum rounded, smaller than half of eye diameter but
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 148-156
©ZFMK
150
Truong Quang Nguyen et al.
Fig. 2. Gerti’s Frog Ophyryophryne gerti (a) and its habitat (b). Photos: Trung M. Phung.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 148-156
©ZFMK
New herpetofaunal records from Vietnam
151
Fig. 3. Langbian Bubble-nest Frog Raorchestes giyllus (a) and its habitat (b). Photos: Trung M. Phung.
greater than tympanum-eye distance (TD 1.2-1 .3 mm,
TYE 0.4-0. 6 mm); supratympanic fold distinct; tongue
notched posteriorly.
Forelimbs: FAL 4. 0-4.2 mm, HAL 6. 6-7. 7 mm; finger
webbing basal, relative length of fingers: I<II<1V<I1I; tips
of fingers enlarged into round discs, with circummargin-
al grooves; subarticular tubercles rounded and prominent;
series of tubercles present along outer side of forearm and
finger IV; nuptial pad present in males.
Hindlimbs: femur as long as tibia but longer than foot
length (FML 11.3-12.4 mm, TBL 11.2-12.3 mm, FTL
9.5 1 0.3 mm); relative length of toes: I<II<III<V<IV; tips
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 148-156
©ZFMK
152
Truong Quang Nguyen et al.
of toes with enlarged discs; subarticular tubercles promi-
nent; inner and outer metatarsal tubercles present; web-
bing formula: I2-2II 1 y3-2 l/2III 1 %-2I V2- 1 V; tubercles
present along outer margins of tibia, foot and toe V; tibio-
tarsal articulation reaching to eye.
Dorsal skin covered by tiny tubercles; throat finely gran-
ular; belly and ventral surface of thigh coarsely granular,
small tubercle present on heel.
Coloration in life varied among individuals: Back-
ground of dorsal surface of head, body and limbs of males
light brown with reddish brown or bright green marbling;
a bright green triangle patch, covering anterior part of up-
per eyelid and snout, sometimes the patch combined with
the posterior bright green marbling; dorsum with two dark
brown stripes, forming a “)(” shape, from rear of eye to
groin, distinct or indistinct; dorsal surface of limbs with
dark brown transverse bars; throat, chest and belly white.
Female uniform green above and whitish beneath.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 148-156
©ZFMK
New herpetofaunal records from Vietnam
153
Remarks: Our specimens differ from previous descrip-
tions (Smith 1924, Orlov et al. 2012) by having dermal
fringe along outside of tarsus less developed (versus well
developed in description of Orlov et al. 2012). Iris light
golden with brown or reddish mottles posteriorly, pupil
horizontal oval and black (not mentioned by Smith 1924
and Orlov et al. 2012). Specimens of R. gryllus from
Khanh Hoa Province are morphologically similar to Kurix-
alus viridescens , a newly described species from south-
ern Vietnam by Nguyen et al. (2014). However, R. gryl-
lus can be distinguished from the latter by the following
characters: the presence of a brown )(-shaped marking on
dorsum and upper part of flank (versus uniform solid green
dorsum in K. viridescens ), outer metatarsal tubercle pres-
ent (versus absent in Kurixalus viridescens ); toe webbing
formula I2-2II 1 'A-VAl II 1 %-2IV2- 1 V (versus I2-23/4II 1 Vi-
23/4IlI 1 1/2-3IV2,/2-l3/4V in K. viridescens ), and the iris light
golden with brown or reddish mottles posteriorly (versus
golden with some black reticulations in K. viridescens ).
Distribution: In Vietnam, R. gryllus was orginally discov-
ered from Langbian Plateau, Lam Dong Province by Smith
( 1924). This species was also reported from northern Viet-
nam: Lao Cai, Ha Giang, Cao Bang, Tuyen Quang, Lang
Son, Vinh Phuc, Thai Nguyen and Thanh Hoa provinces
as well as from central provinces: Dak Lak, Gia Lai, Kon
Turn (Nguyen et al, 2009). This is the first record of R.
gryllus from Khanh Hoa Province. Elsewhere, it has been
known from Champasak Province of Laos (Frost 2014,
and Orlov et al. 2012).
Againidae
Acanthosaura coronata Gunther, 1861
Coronated Tree Lizard / O ro vanh (Fig. 4)
Specimen examined: One adult female, collected by T.
M. Phung on 1 November 2011 from Nui Dinh Mountain
(ca. 10°30’N, 107°07’E), Tan Thanh District, Ba Ria -
Vung Tau Province. This specimen was released after ex-
amining of morphogical characters.
Morphological characters: SVL 90 mm, TaF 125.9 mm
(n=l); forepart of head deeply concave; scales on upper
head inhomogeneous, obtusely keeled, much smaller in
size in posterior part; canthus rostralis and supraciliary
edge distinct; a long spine behind the eye present; anoth-
er spine on the back of the head present, mid-way between
tympanum and nuchal crest; tympanum one-third to one-
half the diameter of orbit; 10-13 supralabials.
Dorsal scales small, keeled, intermixed with much larg-
er, strongly keeled scale; scales on upper rows larger in
size, pointing upwards, lateral scales pointing backwards
and upwards, sometimes downwards; ventrals as large as
(he largest dorsal scales, strongly keeled; gular sac absent;
gular scales strongly keeled, smaller than the ventrals; a
strong oblique fold present in front of shoulder; nuchal
crest with triangular spines; dorsal crest continuous with
the nuchal crest, reduced as a prominent ridge, composed
of broad scales; hind limb extending to the tip of the snout.
Tail compressed, subtriangular at base, covered with
keeled scales above, strongly keeled and elongated scales
below.
Coloration in life: Dorsal surface of head and body dark
grey; dorsum and tail base with four light bands, edged
by black posteriorly; head light green or yellow; a dark
cross-bar present between eyes; some dark lines radiat-
ing from eyes; belly cream (identification after Smith
1935).
Distribution: In Vietnam, this species has been known
from Dak Fak, Lam Dong, and Dong Nai provinces. Else-
where, it was reported from Cambodia (Nguyen et al.
2009).
Gekkonidae
Gekko grossmanni Gunther, 1994
Grossman’s gecko / Tac ke g-ro-s-man (Fig. 5)
Specimens examined: VNMN 960 (male), VNMN 959
and ZFMK 94125-94126 (females), collected by T. M.
Phung on 27 March 2010 from Ca Na forest (ca. 11°19’N,
108°49’E), Ninh Phuoc District, Ninh Thuan Province.
Morphological characters: SVL 71-86 mm, TaL
84.8-101.6 nun (n=4); head longer than wide (HL 20-23.9
mm, HW 13.1-17.2 mm), axillary-groin distance
29.2-34.4 mm.
Rostral wider than high, rarely with X- or Y-shaped su-
ture, touching nostril; supranasals 2 (rarely 3); internasals
0-1; interorbital scales between anterior corners of eyes
40^15; supralabials 11-12, infralabials 9-10; dorsum cov-
ered by small, unequal granular scales interspersed, flat
or slightly keeled tubercles; midbody scales rows
1 18-122; tubercles surrounded by 9 scales, in 11-13 rows
at midbody; tubercles absent on upper surface of limbs and
tail; lateroventral fold distinct; ventral scale rows between
lateral folds 29-3 1 ; ventral scales along underside of body
from mental to the cloacal slit 156-162; subcaudals 86-91,
enlarged; precloacal pores 1 3 (in male), femoral pores ab-
sent; finger and toe webbing basal; subdigital lamellae
10-14 under the first finger, 16-18 under the fourth fin-
ger, 11-15 under the first toe, 17-18 under the fourth toe.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 148-156
©ZFMK
154
Truong Quang Nguyen et al.
Coloration in life: Dorsal surface of head, body and tail
grey intermixed with yellow dots and dark brown mar-
bling; dorsum with several rows of 7-8 light grey spots:
one along vertebral and two others on each side; light
bands present on upper surface of tail (identification af-
ter Gunther 1994, in comparison with Ngo & Gamble
2011).
Distribution: This species has been known only from the
type locality in Khanh Hoa Province, Vietnam (Nguyen
et al. 2009).
Cylindrophiidae
Cylindrophis ruffus (Laurenti, 1768)
Red-tailed Pipe Snake / Ran trim (Fig. 6a)
One specimen was photographed by T. H. Khuong in Oc-
tober 201 1 in Bu Gia Map National Park (ca. 12°10’N,
1 07° 1 2’E), Binh Phuoc Province.
Identification is based on the characteristic body shape
and colour pattern (after Smith 1943): head depressed,
snout round; tail very short. Coloration in life: dorsal head
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 148-156
©ZFMK
New herpetofaunal records from Vietnam
155
Fig. 6. Red-tailed Pipe Snake Cylindrophis ruffus (a) and Guenther’s Kukri Snake Oligodon cinereus pallidocinctus (b) and its
habitat (c). Photos: Thang H. Khuong.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 148-156
©ZFMK
156
Truong Quang Nguyen et al.
and body blackish brown, iridescent, with narrow light
cross-bars, extending to the middle of the back; an orange
ring present near the tip of tail; venter black with white
bars; ventral surface of tail with orange bars.
Distribution: In Vietnam, this species is known from Vinh
Phuc Province in the North southwards to Ca Mau
Province. Elsewhere, it has been recorded from China,
Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Malaysia, Singa-
pore, and Indonesia (Nguyen et al. 2009).
Colubridae
Oligodon cinereus pallidocinctus (Bourret, 1934)
Guenther’s Kukri Snake / Ran khiem xam (Fig. 6b,c)
Specimens examined: IEBR A. 2012. 8, adult female, col-
lected by T. M. Phung and T. FI. Khuong on 12 Septem-
ber 201 1 from Bu Gia Map National Park (ca. 12°10’N,
107°12’E), Binh Phuoc Province.
Morphological characters: SVL 540 mm, TaL: 72 mm;
maxillary teeth 12/12; loreal 1/1; supralabials 8/8, fourth
and fifth entering orbit; infralabials 8/8; preocular single;
postoculars 2; temporals 1+2; dorsal scale rows 17-17-15,
smooth; cloacal entire; ventral scales 183, subcaudals 34,
divided.
Coloration in life: Dorsal head with a grey chevron; dor-
sal surface of body reddish brown with 26 grey, black-
edged bands on body, 4 bands on tail; ventral surface
cream with dark spots (identification after Bourret 1936
and Smith 1943).
Remarks: The female specimen differs from the descrip-
tion of Bourret ( 1936) in having more ventrals ( 183 ver-
sus 1 76), fewer subcaudals (34 vs. 40). Smith ( 1 943) men-
tioned the number of light bands of this subspecies to be
varying from 27-34 on body and 3-4 on tail. Because the
intraspecific taxonomy of Oligodon cinereus remains un-
resolved (David et al. 2011), we provisionally considered
pallidocinctus as a subspecies of this species.
Distribution: In Vietnam, this subspecies is known from
Thua Thien - Hue and Ba Ria - Vung Tau provinces, and
Ho Chi Minh City (“Form IV’’ in Smith 1943). Elsewhere,
Oligodon cinereus has a wide range from India and Chi-
na throughout the Indochina region southward to Thailand
(Nguyen et al. 2009).
Acknowledgements. T.M. Phung is grateful to T. L. T. Nguyen,
H.T. Vu, M. X. Pham, T. M. H. Vu, and T.X. Bui (Ho Chi Minh
City) for assistance in the field. We thank T. H. Khuong (Bu Gia
Map National Park, Binh Phuoc) for providing photos of snakes,
E. Sterling (New York) and K. Koy (Berkeley) for providing the
map. This study was partially supported by the Project TN3/T07
of the National Program Tay Nguyen III. Research of D. T. A.
Tran in Gennany is funded by the Ministry of Education and
Training of Vietnam (MOET, Project 322) and German Academ-
ic Exchange Service (DAAD). Research of T. Q. Nguyen in Ger-
many was funded by the Alexander von Humboldt
Stiftung/Foundation (VIE 114344).
REFERENCES
Bourret R (1936) Les seipents de l’lndochine, II, Catalogue sys-
tematique descriptif. H. Basuyau, Toulouse
David P, Das I, Vogel, G. (201 1) On some taxonomic and nomen-
clatural problems in Indian species of the genus Oligodon
Fitzinger, 1 826 (Squamata: Colubridae). Zootaxa 2799: 1-14
David P, Nguyen QT, Nguyen TT, Jiang K, Chen TB, Teynie A,
Ziegler T (2012) A new species of the genus Oligodon
Fitzinger, 1826 (Squamata: Colubridae) from northern Viet-
nam, southern China and central Laos. Zootaxa 3498: 45-62
Frost DR (2014) Amphibian Species of the World: an Online
Reference. Version 6.0 (23 September 2014). Electronic Data-
base accessible at http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/am-
phibia/index.html. American Museum of Natural History, New
York, USA
Gunther R ( 1994) Eine neue Art der Gattung Gekko (Reptilia,
Squamata, Gekkonidae) aus dem Siiden Vietnams. Zoologi-
scher Anzeiger, Jena 233: 57-67
Ngo TV, Gamble T (2011) Gekko canaensis sp. nov. (Squama-
ta: Gekkonidae), a new gecko from Southern Vietnam.
Zootaxa 2890: 53-64
Nguyen QT, Le DM, Pham TC, Nguyen TT, Bonkowski M,
Ziegler T(2012) A new species of Gracixalus (Amphibia, Anu-
ra, Rhacophoridae) from northern Vietnam. Organisms Diver-
sity & Evolution. Doi 10. 1007/sl3 127-012-01 16-0
Nguyen VS, Ho TC, Nguyen QT (2009) Herpetofauna of Viet-
nam. Edition Chimaira, Frankfurt am Main
Older A (2003) Revision of the genus Opluyopluyne Boulenger,
1903 (Megophryidae) with description of two new species.
Alytes 21: 23-44
Orlov NL, Poyarkov NA, Vassilieva AB, Ananjeva NB, Nguyen
TT, Sang NN, Geisslcr P (2012) Taxonomic notes on rha-
cophorid frogs (Rhacophorinae: Rhacophoridae: Anura) of
southern part of Annamite mountains (Truong Son, Vietnam),
with description of three new species. Russian Journal of Her-
petology, 19 (1): 23-64
Phung MT, Ziegler T (2011 ) Another new Gekko species (Squa-
mata: Gekkonidae) from southern Vietnam. Zootaxa 3129:
51-61
Smith MA (1924) New tree-frogs from Indochina and Malay
peninsula. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London
94(1): 225-234
Smith MA (1935) The fauna of British India, including Ceylon
and Burma. Reptilia and Amphibia. Vol. 2-Sauria. Taylor and
Francis, London
Smith MA (1943) The fauna of British India, Ceylon and Bur-
ma, including the whole of the Indo-Chinese subregion. Vol.
3-Serpentes. Taylor and Francis, London
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 148-156
©ZFMK
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 157-172
December 20 1 4
Towards an improved knowledge of Sericini of the Tibetan highland:
new species and records (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)
Wan-Gang Liu12, Ming Bai', Xing-Ke Yang' & Dirk Ahrens'
1 Key Laboratoiy of Zoological Svstematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Box 92, No. 1,
Beichen West Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101, PR. China
2 Graduate School, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yuquan Road, Shijingshan, Beijing, 100039, P.R. China
1 Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum A. Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, D-531I3 Bonn, Germany; E-mail: d.ahrens@zfmk.de
Abstract. Nine new species of Sericini are described from Tibetan highlands: Calloserica zhangmuensis Liu & Ahrens
sp. n., Gynaecoserica hani Liu & Ahrens sp. n., G. vigongensis Liu & Ahrens sp. n., Lasioserica beibengana Liu & Ahrens
sp. n., Nepaloserica nielamuensis Liu & Ahrens sp. n., Neoserica (s.l.) chayuensis Liu & Ahrens sp. n., N. (s.l.) xizan-
gensis Liu & Ahrens sp. n., Serica (s.l.) fashengi Liu & Ahrens sp. n., S. (s.l .) yadongensis Liu & Ahrens sp. n. Records
are given for further 25 species, most of them being for the first time recorded from Tibet. Distribution maps of these
new species and records are shown along illustrations of habitus and male copulatory organ of the newly described taxa.
Key words. Beetles, chafers, China, new species.
INTRODUCTION
The taxonomy of the fauna of sericine chafer beetles
(Sericini) of the Himalayas and Tibetan highland was re-
vised and reviewed in detail by Ahrens (2004). Subse-
quently, new data and taxa were added (Ahrens 2005a-e,
2006c, Ahrens & Fabrizi 2009a,b, 201 1, Ahrens & Pa-
cholatko 2005) and a number of phylogenetic studies ex-
plored the diversification and biogeographic patterns of
the Himalayan Sericini fauna (Ahrens 2005d, 2006a, b,d-f,
2007a, b). But we have to consider the eastern regions of
the Himalaya and the adjacent mountain regions of north-
ern Myanmar and southwest China including the Tibetan
highland still to be relatively unexplored. This fact ham-
pers more rigorous hypotheses on the diversification of
the Himalayan fauna.
In this paper, we survey the material hold in Chinese in-
stitutional collections resulting in nine new species and
records for further 25 species, most of them being the first
time recorded from Tibet.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The terminology and methods used for measurements,
specimen dissection and genital preparation follow
Ahrens (2004). Data from specimens examined is cited in
the text with original label contents given in quotation
marks, multiple labels are separated by a “/”. Descriptions
are based on holotype specimen if not otherwise stated.
Received: 24.03.2014
Accepted: 14.10.2014
The variation of paratypes is given separately. Male gen-
italia were glued to a small pointed card attached to the
specimen. Descriptions and illustrations of new taxa are
based on the holotype specimen, while the variation of oth-
er specimens is given separately under variation. All de-
scriptions and measurements were made under an Olym-
pus SZX 12 microscope, and all genital and habitus illus-
trations were made with a digital camera ( AxioCam HRc)
attached to a stereo microscope (Zeiss Stereo Discovery
V20) and Axio Version 4.8 software. The distribution map
was generated using Q-GIS 2.0. 1 and Adobe Photoshop
CS4.
Type specimens and other examined material are deposit-
ed in the following institutions:
CAU Department of Entomology,
China Agricultural University, Beijing (China);
HBUM Museum of Hebei University, Baoding
(Hebei Prov., China);
IZAS Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Beijing (China);
NKU Nankai University, (Tianjin Prov., China);
NWAFU Northwest A & F University, Yangling
(Shaanxi Prov., China);
ZFMK Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum A. Koenig,
Bonn (Germany).
Corresponding editor: D. Ahrens
158
Wan-Gang Liu et al.
Fig. 1. A D: Calloserica zhangmuensis Liu & Ahrens sp. n. (holotype), E-H: Gynaecoserica hani Liu & Ahrens sp. n. (holo-
type), I-K: G. yigongensis Liu & Ahrens sp. n. (holotype). A, E, I: Aedeagus, left side lateral view; C, G, K: Aedeagus, light side
lateral view; B, F, J: Parameres, dorsal view; D, H, K: Habitus (not to scale). Scale: 0.5 mm.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 157-172
©ZFMK
Towards an improved knowledge of Sericini of the Tibetan highland: new species and records
159
Calloserica zhangmuensis Liu & Ahrens sp. n.
Type material examined. Holotype: S [China] “Zhang-
mu, Xizang, 28.VI.1975, 2200m, leg. Wang Ziqing”
(IZAS). Paratypes: 1 S [China] “Zhangmu, Xizang,
24.VI.1975, 2200m, leg. Wang Ziqing” (ZFMK), 1 $
[China] “Zhangmu, Xizang, 5. VII. 1 975, 2400m, leg.
Huang Fusheng” (IZAS). 1 $ [China] “Zhangmu, Xizang,
28. VI. 1975, 2200m, leg. Wang Ziqing” (IZAS).
Description. Length: 8.0 mm, length of elytra: 6.2 mm,
width: 4.0 mm. Body oblong and dull, dorsal surface, ven-
tral surface and legs reddish brown, elytral intervals, head
and pronotum darker; dorsal surface with moderately long
and very dense setae being directed anteriorly, with a few
longer erect setae on head and pronotum, even intervals
with large spots composed of minute white, scale-like se-
tae.
Labroclypeus short, trapezoidal, widest at base, lateral
margins convex and moderately convergent from base to
broadly rounded anterior angles, anterior margin strongly
concavely sinuate, labrum strongly produced medially, lat-
eral border and ocular canthus producing a distinct obtuse
angle, all margins moderately reflexed; surface flat and
shiny, finely and densely punctate, with several long erect
setae in larger punctures; frontoclypeal suture moderate-
ly impressed and curved, smooth area anterior to eye 1 .5
times as wide as long; ocular canthus long and narrow,
finely and densely punctate, glabrous, terminal seta lack-
ing. Frons moderately densely and finely punctate, punc-
tures shortly and erectly setose, with a few long erect se-
tae setae beside eyes. Eyes small, ratio of diameter/ inte-
rocular width: 0.61. Antenna missing in holotype. Men-
tion elevated and flattened anteriorly.
Pronotum widest at base, lateral margins evenly convex
and convergent anteriorly, anterior angles moderately
rounded, not produced and nearly obsolete, anterior mar-
gin straight, without marginal line, basal margin without
marginal line; surface with very dense and fine punctures
each bearing a yellow fine and erect seta, partly with
longer erect setae, midline not impressed, with a weak
transverse impression behind middle; anterior border fine-
ly setose, setae of lateral margins lacking; hypomeron car-
inate, basal margin of hypomeron distinctly produced ven-
trally. Scutellum subtriangular, apex moderately rounded,
with fine and dense punctures and fine setae, impunctate
on basal midline.
Elytra oblong, widest at middle, striae moderately im-
pressed, with fine and dense punctures; intervals flat, with
evenly distributed, fine and dense punctures, finely and
erectly setose, with numerous longer setae on each inter-
val, even intervals with large spots composed of minute
white, scale-like setae; epipleural edge moderately strong,
ending at strongly rounded external apical angle of ely-
tra, epipleura densely setose, apical border chitinous, with-
out short microtrichomes.
Ventral surface with large and dense punctures, includ-
ing metacoxa with fine adpressed setae. Abdominal ster-
nites finely and densely punctate and finely setose, each
sternite with an indistinct transverse row of coarser punc-
tures each bearing a short, robust seta. Penultimate
abdominal sternite fiat, without transverse elevation
posteriorly. Mesosternum between mesocoxae as wide as
mesofemur, with numerous strong setae on an indistinct
semicircular carina. Ratio of length of metepistemum/
metacoxa: 1/ 1.38. Pygidium moderately convex, with fine
and dense punctures each bearing a fine short seta, with
a few longer setae on apical half, midline narrowly
smooth, apical margin slightly reflexed.
Legs slender and moderately shiny, femora finely and
densely punctate, densely setose. Tarsomeres glabrous and
impunctate dorsally, with sparse, short setae ventrally. Pos-
terior legs missing in holotype. Protibia moderately long,
bidentate, protarsal claws symmetrical, basal tooth of in-
ner claw sharply truncate at apex.
Aedeagus: Fig. 1A-C.
Diagnosis. The new species resembles in genital morphol-
ogy mostly C. poggii Ahrens, 1 995. It differs by the much
shorter basomedian process of parameres, the smaller left
paramere (in lateral view) as well as the apparently short-
er phallobasis.
Variation. Length: 7.4-8. 9 mm, length of elytra: 6. 2-7. 4
mm, width: 3. 6-4. 8 mm. Anterior edge of metafemur
acute, lacking an adjacent serrated line, posterior margin
weakly convex, with numerous strong setae medially,
weakly widened ventrally in apical half but not serrate,
senate dorsally, with short setae. Metatibia moderately
long, widest at apex, ratio width/ length: 1/4.2, dorsal mar-
gin sharply carinate, with two groups of spines, basal
group shortly before middle, apical one at three quarters
of metatibial length, with a few single spines basally; lat-
eral face longitudinally convex, with a few sparse and
coarse punctures, ventral edge finely serrate, with three
robust equidistant setae; medial face impunctate and
smooth, apex concavely truncate interiorly near tarsal ar-
ticulation. Metatarsomeres smooth dorsally, with a strong-
ly serrated ridge ventrally and a lateral longitudinal cari-
na, first metatarsomere as long as following two tar-
someres combined and little less than twice as long as dor-
sal tibial spur. Female: antennal club with three anten-
nomeres, as long as remaining antennomeres combined.
Etymology. The new species is named after the type lo-
cality, Zhangmu.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 157-172
©ZFMK
160
Wan-Gang Liu et al.
Gynaecoserica hani Liu & Ahrens sp. n.
Type material examined. Holotype: S [China] “Beibeng,
Motuo, Xizang, 17.V. 1983, 850m, leg. Han Yinheng”
(IZAS). Paratype: 1 $ [China] “Beibeng, Motuo, Xizang,
17.V.1983, 850m, leg. Han Yinheng” (IZAS).
Description. Length: 5.2 mm, length of elytra: 3.9 mm,
width: 3. 1 mm. Body oblong, shiny, including antenna yel-
lowish brown, pronotum, frons and metasternum darker,
dorsal surface except a few setae on head glabrous.
Labroclypeus narrow, widest at base, lateral margins
strongly convex and convergent from base to moderate-
ly rounded anterior angles, lateral margin and ocular can-
thus producing a distinct obtuse angle, anterior margin
weakly sinuate medially, margins weakly reflexed; surface
weakly convex medially and moderately shiny, coarsely
and densely punctate, with several long erect setae behind
anterior margin; frontoclypeal suture moderately im-
pressed and curved, smooth area anterior to eye 1 .5 times
as wide as long; ocular canthus short and moderately nar-
row, impunctate, with a short terminal seta. Frons with
moderately dense punctures, glabrous, only beside each
eye with a single long seta. Eyes small, ratio of diameter/
interocular width: 0.6. Antenna with ten antennomeres,
club with four antennomeres, as long as remaining anten-
nomeres combined. Mentum elevated and flattened ante-
riorly.
Pronotum widest at base, lateral margins nearly straight
and evenly and moderately convergent anteriorly, in an-
terior third slightly convex and more strongly convergent,
anterior angles distinctly produced and sharp, posterior an-
gles blunt, anterior margin convexly produced medially,
with a fine marginal line, basal margin without marginal
line; surface with dense and coarse punctures, on sides
with minute setae, midline not impressed; anterior and lat-
eral borders sparsely setose; hypomeron carinate, basal
margin of hypomeron not produced ventrally. Scutellum
subtriangular, apex moderately rounded, with fine, dense
punctures and minute setae, smooth medially.
Elytra oblong, widest at middle, striae moderately im-
pressed, with fine and dense punctures; intervals weakly
convex, with fine and dense punctures concentrated along
striae; epipleural edge moderately strong, ending at blunt-
ly rounded external apical angle of elytra, epipleura sparse-
ly setose, apical border chitinous, without short microtri-
chomes.
Ventral surface partly dull laterally, with large and dense
punctures, sparsely setose, metacoxa only laterally with
a few fine adpressed setae. Abdominal sternites finely and
densely punctate, nearly glabrous, each stemite with a dis-
tinct transverse row of coarse punctures each bearing a
short robust seta. Mesostemum between mesocoxae as
wide as mesofemur. Ratio of length of metepisternum/
metacoxa: 1/ 1.59. Pygidium shiny, beside apical margin
dull, surface moderately convex, with fine, dense punc-
tures and fine, moderately long setae beside apical mar-
gin, without smooth midline.
Legs moderately long; femora shiny, with two longitu-
dinal rows of setae, finely and sparsely punctate; anteri-
or edge of metafemur acute and without a submarginal ser-
rate line, posterior margin weakly convex, ventral part
smooth and glabrous, only weakly widened in apical half
and not serrate, dorsal margin finely serrate and with fine
short setae. Metatibia slender and moderately long, uni-
formly widened towards apex, ratio width/ length 1/ 2.94,
dorsal margin sharply carinate, longitudinally convex on-
ly basally, with two groups of spines, basal group at one
third, apical group at two thirds of metatibial length, with
a few single, fine spines basally; external face longitudi-
nally convex, with sparse and fine punctures, glabrous;
ventral margin sharp and finely serrate, with three strong
equidistant spines; internal face finely and sparsely punc-
tate, smooth, apex sharply and deeply truncate interiorly
near tarsal articulation. Tarsomeres dorsally glabrous and
impunctate, ventrally with sparse, short setae; metatar-
sonreres ventrally with a strongly serrate ridge, first
metatarsomere little shorter than following two tarsomeres
combined and one third of its length longer than dorsal
tibial spur. Protibia moderately long, bidentate, protarsal
claws symmetrical.
Aedeagus: Fig. 1E-G.
Diagnosis. The new species differs from all other Hi-
malayan Gynaecoserica Brenske, 1896 species by the
shiny body surface and the short antennal club. In exter-
nal morphology it is quite similar to G. compacta Ahrens
& Fabrizi, 2009 differing, however, in the wide lateral
process of phallobasis (lateral view) and the shorter para-
meres.
Variation. Female: Length: 5.1 mm, length of elytra: 3.8
mm, width: 3.1 mm. Antennal club composed of three an-
tennomeres, shorter than remaining antennomeres com-
bined. Eyes as large as in male.
Etymology. The new species is named after its collector,
Han Yinheng.
Gynaecoserica yigongensis Liu & Ahrens sp. n.
Type material examined. Holotype S [China] “Yigong,
Xizang, 1 1. VI. 1978, leg. Li Fasheng” (CAU). Paratype:
I $ [China] “Yigong, Xizang, 11. VI. 1978, leg. Li
Fasheng” (CAU).
Description. Length: 6.2 mm, length of elytra: 5 mm,
width: 3.7 mm. Body oblong and shiny, surface dark red-
dish brown, frons, abdomen and some spots on elytra dark
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 157-172
©ZFMK
Towards an improved knowledge of Sericini of the Tibetan highland: new species and records
161
brown, legs and antenna yellowish brown, dorsal surface
nearly glabrous.
Labroclypeus subrectangular, widest at base, lateral mar-
gins in basal half subparallel, anterior angles broadly
rounded, lateral border and ocular canthus producing a dis-
tinct obtuse angle, anterior margin weakly sinuate medi-
ally, margins weakly reflexed, surface weakly convex me-
dially and moderately shiny, very coarsely and densely
punctate, with a few long erect setae behind anterior mar-
gin; frontoclypeal suture moderately impressed and
curved, smooth area anterior to eye narrow, 1 .25 times as
wide as long; ocular canthus short and slender, glabrous,
without terminal seta. Frons shiny, with coarse and
irregularly dense punctures. Eyes small, ratio of diame-
ter/ interocular width: 0.54. Antenna with ten anten-
nomeres, club in male with four antennomeres, as long as
remaining antennomeres combined, first joint of club
slightly shorter than club. Mentum elevated and flattened
anteriorly.
Pronotum widest at base, lateral margins nearly straight,
in basal half subparallel, evenly moderately convergent an-
teriorly, in anterior third slightly convex and more
strongly convergent, anterior angles distinctly produced
and sharp, posterior angles blunt, anterior margin convex-
ly produced medially, with a fine marginal line, basal mar-
gin without marginal line; surface with dense and mod-
erately coarse punctures, glabrous, midline not im-
pressed; anterior and lateral borders sparsely setose; hy-
pomeron carinate, basal margin of hypomeron not pro-
duced ventrally. Scutellum subtriangular, apex moderately
rounded, with fine, dense punctures and minute setae,
widely smooth medially.
Elytra oblong, widest at middle, striae moderately im-
pressed, with fine and dense punctures; intervals weakly
convex, with fine and dense punctures concentrated along
striae, some punctures produce transverse wrinkles extend-
ing over more than one interval, impuctate portions slight-
ly darker; epipleural edge moderately strong, ending at
strongly rounded external apical angle of elytra, epipleu-
ra densely setose, apical border chitinous, without short
microtrichomes.
Ventral surface dull, with large and dense punctures,
nearly glabrous except a few erect setae on metastemal
disc, metacoxa laterally with a few short adpressed setae.
Abdominal stemites finely and densely punctate, with fine,
short setae, each stemite with an indistinct transverse row
of coarse punctures each bearing a short robust seta. Ul-
timate and penultimate abdominal stemites with a shal-
low, longitudinal median excavation. Mesostemum be-
tween mesocoxae as wide as mesofemur. Ratio of length
of metepistemum/ metacoxa; 1/ 1.26. Pygidium weakly
convex and entirely shiny, with fine and dense punctures,
without smooth midline, with a few longer setae along api-
cal margin.
Legs moderately robust and long; femora shiny, with
two longitudinal rows of setae, finely and sparsely punc-
tate; anterior margin of metafemur sharply carinate, with-
out a submarginal serrate line, posterior margin weakly
convex and glabrous, ventral part smooth and glabrous,
only weakly widened in apical half and not serrate, dor-
sal margin finely serrate and with fine and short setae.
Metatibia slender and moderately long, uniformly widened
toward apex, ratio width/ length: 1/ 3.5, dorsal margin
nearly longitudinally convex, indistinctly carinate only in
apical third, with two groups of spines, basal group at one
third, apical group at two thirds of metatibial length, basal-
ly with a few single, fine spines; external face longitudi-
nally convex, with sparse and fine punctures, glabrous;
ventral margin carinate and senate, with four robust equi-
distant spines; internal face finely and sparsely punctate,
smooth, apex sharply and deeply truncate interiorly near
tarsal articulation. Tarsomeres dorsally glabrous and im-
punctate, ventrally with sparse, short setae; metatar-
someres ventrally with a strongly serrate ridge, first
metatarsomere one third of its length longer than dorsal
tibial spur, subsequent tarsomeres lacking in holotype.
Protibia moderately long, bidentate, protarsal claws sym-
metrical.
Aedeagus: Fig. 1I-K.
Diagnosis. Gynaecoserica yigongensis sp. n. is in exter-
nal shape similar to G. compacta. It differs by the longer
and apically extended lateral apophysis of phallobasis as
well as by the long, fused parameres being bent laterally
(to the right). From G. hani sp. n. it may be distinguished
by the slightly larger size, the shape of parameres as well
as the longer lateral apophysis of phallobasis.
Etymology. The new species is named after the type lo-
cality, Yigong.
Variation. Length: 6. 1-6.2 mm, length of elytra; 4. 6-5.0
mm, width: 3. 6-3. 7 mm. Female: Antennal club composed
of three antennomeres, shorter than remaining anten-
nomeres combined.
Lasioserica beibengana Liu & Ahrens sp. n.
Type material examined. Holotype: $ [China] “Beibeng,
Motuo, Xizang, 20.V.1983, 800m, 850m, 800-900m, leg.
Han Yinheng” (IZAS). Paratypes: 1 S [China] “Beibeng,
Motuo, Xizang, 27.V.1983, 800m, 850m, 800-900m, leg.
Han Yinheng” (IZAS), 1 $ [China] “Beibeng, Motuo,
Xizang, 29. V. 1983, 800m, 850m, 800-900m, leg. Han
Yinheng” (ZFMK).
Description. Length: 5.4 mm, length of elytra: 4.0 mm,
width: 3.5 mm. Body oblong, dorsal surface dark brown,
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 157-172
©ZFMK
162
Wan-Gang Liu et al.
Fig. 2. A -D: Lasioserica beibengana Liu & Ahrens sp. n. (holotype), E-H: Nepaloserica nielamuensis Liu & Ahrens sp. n. (holo-
type), I K: Neoserica (s.l.) chayuensis Liu & Ahrens sp. n. (holotype). A, E, I: Aedeagus, left side lateral view; C, G, K: Aedea-
gus, right side lateral view; B, F, J: Parameres, dorsal view; D, H, K: Habitus (not to scale). Scale: 0.5 mm.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 157-172
©ZFMK
Towards an improved knowledge of Sericini of the Tibetan highland: new species and records
163
antenna and ventral surface brown, dorsal surface dull,
pronotum and head with greenish shine, sparsely setose,
with fine minute and white, scale-like setae on elytra and
pronotum.
Labroclypeus subtrapezoidal, widest at base, lateral mar-
gins in basal half subparallel, anterioly strongly convex
and strongly convergent from middle to broadly rounded
anterior angles, lateral border and ocular canthus produc-
ing a distinct obtuse angle, anterior margin concavely sin-
uate, margins weakly reflexed; surface weakly convex me-
dially and moderately shiny, finely and densely punctate,
with a few long erect setae behind anterior margin; fron-
toclypeal suture weakly impressed and moderately curved,
smooth area anterior to eye 1 .5 times as wide as long; oc-
ular canthus moderately long and narrow, finely and
densely punctate, without terminal seta. Frons dull, fine-
ly and in part densely punctate. Eyes small, ratio of di-
ameter/ interocular width: 0.5. Antenna with ten anten-
nomeres, club in male with four antennomeres, 1 .2 times
as long as remaining antennomeres combined, first joint
of club slightly shorter than club. Mentum elevated and
flattened anteriorly.
Pronotum widest at base, lateral margins subparallel,
nearly straight, distinctly and widely sinuate before pos-
terior angles, moderately curved anteriorly and convergent
to acute, distinctly produced anterior angles, posterior an-
gles nearly right-angled, anterior margin nearly straight,
with a fine marginal line, basal margin without marginal
line; surface with dense and coarse punctures each bear-
ing either an adpressed, minute seta or a moderately long,
white scale, with a transverse impression behind middle;
anterior and lateral borders sparsely setose; hypomeron
carinate, basal margin of hypomeron weakly produced
ventrally. Scutellum subtriangular, apex moderately
rounded, with fine and dense punctures and moderate se-
tae, smooth on basal midline.
Elytra oblong, widest shortly behind middle, striae
moderately impressed, with fine and dense punctures; in-
tervals moderately convex, with fine and dense punctures
concentrated along striae, with sparse, short white scales
or minute setae; epipleural edge moderately strong, end-
ing at strongly rounded external apical angle of elytra, epi-
pleura densely setose, apical border narrowly membrane-
ous, with very short microtrichomes.
Ventral surface dull, with large and dense punctures,
sparsely setose, metacoxa only laterally with a few fine,
adpressed setae. Abdominal sternites finely and densely
punctate and minutely setose, each sternite with a distinct
transverse row of coarse punctures each bearing a short,
robust seta. Penultimate abdominal sternite without tuber-
cles but slightly transversely elevated medially. Mesoster-
num between mesocoxae as wide as mesofemur. Ratio of
length of metepisternum/ metacoxa: 1/ 1.38. Pygidium
moderately convex and dull, with coarse, dense punctures
and fine, white setae, with wide smooth midline.
Legs moderately slender and long; femora dull on ven-
tral face, with two longitudinal rows of setae, finely and
sparsely punctate; anterior edge of metafemur acute, with
an adjacent serrated line, ventrally weakly widened ven-
trally in apical half but not serrate, dorsally serrate. Tar-
someres glabrous, finely punctate dorsally, with sparse,
short setae ventrally. Metatibia including tarsi missing in
holotype. Protibia moderately long, bidentate. Protar-
someres missing in holotype. Female unknown.
Aedeagus: Fig. 2A-C.
Diagnosis. The shape of parameres is similar to those of
L. turaensis Ahrens, 2000. It differs significantly by the
at left side ventrally extended phallobasis, whose interi-
or rim of dorsoapical median sinuation produces a sharply
pointed dorsal process, which is unique trait among all oth-
er so far known Lasioserica Brenske, 1896 species.
Variation. Length: 5. 0-5. 6 mm, length of elytra: 3. 8-3. 9
mm, width: 3. 0-3. 2 mm. Protarsomeres short and robust,
claws slightly asymmetrical, basal tooth of interior pro-
tarsal claw widened and bluntly truncate.
Etymology. The new species is named after the type lo-
cality, Beibeng.
Nepaloserica nielantuensis Liu & Ahrens sp. n.
Type material examined. Flolotype S “Zhangmu, Niela-
mu, Xizang, 23. IV. 1974, 2250m, leg. Zhang Xuezhong”
(IZAS). Paratypes: 3 S “Zhangmu, Nielamu, Xizang,
23. IV. 1974, 2250m, leg. Zhang Xuezhong” (IZAS,
ZFMK), 1 <$ “Zhangmu, Nielamu, Xizang, 10. V. 1966,
2200m, leg. Wang Shuyong” (IZAS).
Description. Length: 9.9 mm, length of elytra: 8.2 mm,
width: 5.2 mm. Body oblong, dorsal and ventral surface
reddish brown and dull, antenna brown, except a few se-
tae on head sparsely setose.
Labroclypeus narrow and nearly square, widest at base,
lateral margins weakly convex and convergent from base
to moderately rounded anterior angles, lateral border and
ocular canthus producing a distinct obtuse angle, anterior
margin moderately sinuate but strongly retlexed; surface
nearly flat and shiny, finely and densely punctate, with a
few long erect setae in coarser punctures anteriorly; fron-
toclypeal suture weakly impressed and moderately curved,
smooth area anterior to eye 1 .5 times as wide as long; oc-
ular canthus long and slender, finely and densely punc-
tate, with one to two terminal setae. Frons dull, finely and
densely punctate, punctures vanish under dull toment, with
a few long setae on posterior frons and beside eyes, oth-
erwise only with minute setae. Eyes moderately large, ra-
tio of diameter/ interocular width: 0.66. Antenna with ten
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 157-172
©ZFMK
164
Wan-Gang Liu et al.
antennomeres, club with seven antennomeres, 1.5 times
as long as remaining antennomeres combined, first joint
of club slightly shorter than club. Mentum elevated and
flattened anteriorly.
Pronotum widest at middle, lateral margins in basal half
subparallel, moderately curved and convergent anterior-
ly, anterior angles acute, distinctly produced, posterior an-
gles blunt, anterior margin weakly produced medially, with
a fine marginal line, basal margin without marginal line;
surface with dense and coarse punctures bearing often a
minute, adpressed seta; anterior and lateral borders
sparsely setose; hypomeron carinate, basal margin of hy-
pomeron not produced. Scutellum subtriangular, apex
moderately rounded, with coarse and dense punctures.
Elytra oblong, widest at posterior third, striae distinct-
ly impressed, with fine and dense punctures; intervals
moderately convex, with fine and dense punctures con-
centrated along striae, glabrous except minute setae and
a few short setae on lateral intervals; epipleural edge mod-
erately strong, ending at strongly rounded external apical
angle of elytra, epipleura densely setose, apical border
membraneous, with a fine rim of short microtrichomes.
Ventral surface with large and dense punctures, sparse-
ly setose, on metastemum with moderately dense and long
setae; metacoxa only laterally with a few fine adpressed
setae. Abdominal stemites finely and densely punctate,
with fine, short setae medially on basal stemites and
minute ones only laterally on other stemites, each stern-
ite with a distinct transverse row of coarse punctures each
bearing a short robust seta, abdominal stemites without
any elevation. Mesosternum between mesocoxae as wide
as mesofemur. Ratio of length of metepistemum/ meta-
coxa: 1/ 1.51. Pygidium moderately evenly convex, with
coarse and dense punctures and a few moderately long se-
tae on apical half; without smooth midline.
Legs slender and long; femora with two longitudinal
rows of setae, finely and sparsely punctate; anterior edge
of metafemur acute with an adjacent serrated line,
ventrally weakly widened ventrally in apical half but not
serrate, dorsal ly serrate. Metatibia moderately wide,
widened at base, ratio width/ length: 1/3.9, dorsal margin
sharply carinate, with two groups of spines, basal group
at one third, apical one at three quarters of metatibial
length, with a few single spines basally; lateral face lon-
gitudinally convex, with very sparse and fine punctures,
along the middle nearly impunctate, ventral margin ser-
rate, with three robust equidistant spines; medial face im-
punctate and smooth, apex interiorly near tarsal articula-
tion shallowly concavely truncate. Tarsomeres glabrous
and finely punctate dorsally, with sparse, short setae ven-
trally, metatarsomeres with a serrated ridge ventrally, and
a sharp carina immediately beside it, first metatarsomere
slightly shorter than following two tarsomeres combined
and slightly longer than the dorsal tibial spur. Protibia
short, bidentate, protarsal claws broken. Female unknown.
Aedeagus: Fig. 2 E-G.
Diagnosis. The new species is in shape of parameres rather
similar to N. procera procera Frey, 1965 and N. procera
rufescens Frey, 1965. From both it differs by the setose
frons, the lack of elevations on penultimate stemites, as
well as the broadly inserted basal lobe of right paramere,
which is over half of its length fused with the paramere.
Etymology. The new species is named after the type lo-
cality, Nielamu.
Variation. Length: 9.3-11.3 mm, length of elytra: 7.4-8. 8
mm, width: 5. 3-5. 9 mm. Protarsal claws symmetrical,
basal tooth of inner claw sharply truncate at apex.
Neoserica (s.l.) chayuensis Liu & Ahrens sp. n.
Type material examined. Holotype <$ [China] “Xi-
achayu, Chayu, Xizang, 12-1 3. VII. 2005, leg. Shi Aimin’’
(HBUM). Paratypes: 1 $ [China] “Xiachayu, Chayu,
Xizang, 12-13.VII.2005, leg. Shi Aimin’’ (HBUM), 2 S
[China] “Xiachayu, Chayu, Xizang, 15. VII. 2005, leg. Shi
Aimin’’ (HBUM, ZFMK).
Diagnosis. Length: 8.9 mm, length of elytra: 6.8 mm,
width: 5.4 mm. Body oval, dorsal and ventral surface dull
and dark brown, legs reddish brown, antenna yellow, dor-
sal surface with yellowish, short and fine, dense setae.
Labroclypeus trapezoidal, widest at base, lateral mar-
gins moderately convex and convergent from base to
broadly rounded anterior angles, anterior margin weakly
sinuate and moderately re flexed, lateral border and ocu-
lar canthus producing a distinct obtuse angle, surface flat
and shiny, at base dull, finely and densely punctate, with
numerous long, erect setae; frontoclypeal suture weakly
incised and moderately curved, smooth area anterior to eye
1 .5 times as wide as long; ocular canthus moderately long
and slender, impunctate, with one or two terminal setae.
Frons finely and densely punctate, completely dull, with
dense and long erect setae. Eyes small, ratio of diameter/
interocular width: 0.56. Antenna with ten antennomeres,
club in male with six antennomeres, as long as remain-
ing antennomeres combined, first joint of club slightly
shorter than club. Mentum elevated and flattened anteri-
orly.
Pronotum widest at base, lateral margins weakly
curved and evenly convergent anteriorly, anterior angles
acute, moderately produced, posterior angles wekaly
rounded, anterior margin moderately convex, with distinct
and fine marginal line, basal margin without marginal line;
surface with dense and coarse punctures each bearing a
yellow, semi-erect, short seta being bent slight posterior-
ly, disc without any impression; anterior and lateral bor-
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 157-172
©ZFMK
Towards an improved knowledge of Sericini of the Tibetan highland: new species and records
165
ders sparsely setose, setae slightly longer than those of the
disc; hypomeron carinate, basal margin of hypomeron not
produced. Scutellum subtriangular, apex moderately
rounded, with fine and dense punctures and fine setae.
Elytra oblong, widest shortly behind middle, striae
weakly impressed, finely and densely punctate; intervals
weakly convex, with evenly distributed, fine and dense
punctures, each bearing a fine, semi-erect, yellow seta, odd
intervals with a few longer, erect setae; epipleural edge
moderately strong, ending at strongly rounded external
apical angle of elytra, epipleura densely setose, apical bor-
der finely membraneous, with a fine rim of very short mi-
crotrichomes.
Ventral surface dull, with large, dense punctures and
dense, sparse setae, metacoxa glabrous, with a few robust
setae laterally only. Abdominal stemites finely and
densely punctate, with fine, dense, short setae, each ster-
nite with a distinct transverse row of coarse punctures each
bearing a short robust seta. Mesostemum between meso-
coxae as wide as mesofemur. Ratio of length of metepis-
temum/ metacoxa: 1/ 1 .67. Pygidium weakly convex, with
coarse, dense punctures and shorter and longer, fine se-
tae, without smooth midline.
Legs moderately slender and long, moderately shiny,
femora with fine and dense punctures and sparsely setose;
anterior edge of metafemur acute, lacking an adjacent ser-
rated line, ventral posterior margin weakly convex,
weakly widened ventrally in apical half but not serrate,
with a few fine setae, dorsal posterior margin serrate, with
a few fine setae. Metatibia long and moderately wide,
widest at apex, ratio width/ length: 1/ 4.2, dorsal margin
sharply carinate, with two groups of spines, basal group
shortly before middle, apical one shortly behind three
quarters of metatibial length, with a few single spines
basally on a short and blunt longitudinal elevation; later-
al face longitudinally convex, with sparse and large, shal-
low punctures; ventral margin senate, with three nearly
equidistant robust setae; medial face impunctate and
smooth, apex shallowly sinuate interiorly near tarsal ar-
ticulation. Tarsomeres glabrous and finely and superficial-
ly punctate dorsally, with sparse, short setae ventrally,
metatarsomeres with a strongly serrated ridge ventrally
and a fine longitudinal carina immediately beside it, first
metatarsomere slightly longer than following two
tarsomeres combined and one third of its length longer
than dorsal tibial spur. Protibia short, bidentate, protarsal
claws symmetrical.
Aedeagus: Fig. 2I-K.
Diagnosis. The new species resembles in external and gen-
ital morphology to Neoserica barberi (Sharp, 1903) from
southern India; it shares the subsymmetrical male geni-
talia, the shape of labroclypeus and legs, as well as the
configuration of antennal club. From all species of the N.
barberi group the new species differs by the dense pilos-
ity of the dorsal body surface, as well as by the basal lobe
present at each paramere.
Variation. Length: 8.9-10.5 mm, length of elytra: 6.8-8
mm, width: 5. 4-6. 6 mm. Female. Eyes smaller, ratio of
diameter/ interocular width: 0.51, antennal club composed
of five antennomeres, first joint of club subequal to one
sixth of club length.
Etymology. The new species is named after the type lo-
cality, Chayu.
Remarks. Head and pronotum of one paratype (“Xi-
achayu, Chayu, Xizang, 1 5. VII. 2005, leg. Shi Aimin’’) are
missing.
Neoserica (s.l.) xizangensis Liu & Ahrens sp. n.
Type material examined. Holotype: S [China] “Lang-
cun, Lang County, Xizang, 8.VI.1986, 3080m, No. 581”
(IZAS). Paratype: 1 $ [China] “Langxian County,
Xizang, 5.VII.I981, leg. Chen Tailu” (ZFMK).
Description. Length: 8.0 mm, length of elytra: 5.8 mm,
width: 4.0 mm. Body oblong, including legs yellowish
brown, head slightly darker, antenna yellow, dorsal sur-
face shiny, nearly glabrous.
Labroclypeus trapezoidal, widest at base, lateral margins
moderately convex and convergent from base to moder-
ately rounded anterior angles, anterior margin weakly
sinuate medially, margins moderately reflexed, lateral mar-
gin and ocular canthus producing a distinct obtuse angle;
surface fiat, coarsely and very densely punctate, distance
between punctures less their diameter, with a few short
setae behind anterior margin; frontoclypeal suture weakly
impressed and moderately curved, smooth area anterior
to eye twice as wide as long; ocular canthus moderately
long, finely and densely punctate, without terminal seta.
Frons densely and coarsely punctate, entirely glabrous.
Eyes moderately large, ratio of diameter/ interocular
width: 0.69. Antenna with ten antennomeres, club in male
with four antennomeres, as long as remaining anten-
nomeres combined, first joint of club slightly shorter than
club. Mentum elevated and flattened anteriorly.
Pronotum widest at middle, lateral margins weakly but
evenly curved and convergent anteriorly and posteriorly,
anterior angles right-angled, weakly produced, posterior
angles blunt, anterior margin convexly produced medial-
ly, with distinct marginal line, basal margin without mar-
ginal line; surface with very dense and coarse punctures,
without impressions; anterior and lateral borders sparse-
ly setose; hypomeron only medially slightly carinate, ca-
rina completely reduced laterally, basal margin of hy-
pomeron not produced. Scutellum subtriangular, apex
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 157-172
©ZFMK
166
Wan-Gang Liu et al.
Fig. 3. A-D: Neoserica (s.l.) xizangensis Liu & Ahrens sp. n. (holotype), E- I I: Serica (s.l ,)fashengi Liu & Ahrens sp. n. (holo-
type). I K: S. (s.l.) yadongensis Liu & Ahrens sp. n. (holotype). A, E, I: Aedeagus, left side lateral view; C, G, K: Aedeagus, right
side lateral view; B, F, J: Parameres, dorsal view; D, H, K: Habitus (not to scale). Scale: 0.5 mm.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 157-172
©ZFMK
Towards an improved knowledge of Sericini of the Tibetan highland: new species and records
167
moderately rounded, with coarse and dense punctures,
glabrous.
Elytra oblong, widest at middle, striae weakly im-
pressed, with fine and dense punctures; intervals weakly
convex, with fine and dense punctures concentrated along
striae, punctures with very minute setae, odd intervals with
a few short yellow setae; epipleural edge robust, ending
at strongly rounded external apical angle of elytra, epipleu-
ra densely setose, apical border chitinous, without short
microtrichomes.
Ventral surface dull or weakly shiny, with large and
dense punctures, sparsely setose except on metasternal
disc. Mesostemum between mesocoxae as wide as
mesofemur, with numerous strong setae on an indistinct
semicircular carina. Ratio of length of metepistemum/
metacoxa: 1/ 1.27. Abdominal stemites finely and dense-
ly punctate, with fine, moderately dense setae on basal
stemites, otherwise sparsely setose, each stemite with an
indistinct transverse row of coarse punctures each bear-
ing a short robust seta. Pygidium weakly convex and
shiny, with fine, moderately dense punctures and fine se-
tae, without smooth midline.
Legs long and slender, shiny, femora finely and sparse-
ly punctate, sparsely setose; anterior edge of metafemur
acute, lacking an adjacent serrated line, posterior ventral
margin weakly convex, weakly widened ventrally in api-
cal half but not senate, posterior dorsal margin smooth,
densely and shortly setose. Metatibia slender and very
long, widest at apex, ratio width/ length: 1/ 6, dorsal mar-
gin longitudinally convex, not carinate, with two groups
of spines, basal group at one quarter, apical one at two
thirds of metatibial length, with a few single spines basal-
ly; lateral face longitudinally convex, with dense and
coarse, longitudinally impressed punctures, glabrous; ven-
tral edge carinate and finely serrate, with four equidistant
robust spines, between each of them with a single short
seta; medial face densely punctate and with long, dense
setae, apex sharply truncate interiorly near tarsal articu-
lation. Tarsomeres glabrous and finely punctate dorsally,
with moderately dense, short setae ventrally; metatar-
someres with a strongly serrated ridge ventrally and a fine
longitudinal carina immediately beside it, first metatar-
somere slightly longer than following tarsomere and as
long as dorsal tibial spur. Protibia long, bidentate, protar-
someres missing in holotype.
Aedeagus: Fig. 3A-C.
Diagnosis. At the moment it is difficult to nominate a clos-
er relative of this new species. The reduced carina of hy-
pomeron is found in Asia only in Tetraserica Ahrens, 2004
and Serica (s. str.) MacLeay, 1819 [from whose N. xizan-
gensis differs in shape of aedeagus], while the shape of
legs resemble somewhat those of Sericania Motschulsky,
1 860, however, parameres are simple and do not have
basal lobes as all other Sericania species.
Etymology. The new species is named after its occurrence
in Xizang.
Variation. Length: 7. 3-8.0 mm, length of elytra: 5. 4-5. 8
mm, width: 3. 5-4.0 mm. Protarsomeres long and slender,
claws symmetrical, basal teeth of protarsal claws sharply
pointed.
Serica (s.l. ) fashengi Liu & Ahrens sp. n.
Type material examined. Holotype: <$ [China] “Yigong,
Xizang, 29. VII. 1978, 2300m, leg. Li Fasheng” (CAU).
Paratypes: 1 [China] “Yigong, Xizang, 25.VII.1976,
2050m, leg. Li Fasheng” (ZFMK).
Description. Length: 9.2 mm, length of elytra: 7.7 mm,
width: 5.6 mm. Body oblong-oval including legs dark
reddish brown, dull, antenna yellowish brown, dorsal sur-
face nearly glabrous, head and pronotum moderately
shiny.
Labroclypeus subtrapezoidal, widest at base, lateral mar-
gins nearly straight and strongly convergent to broadly
rounded anterior angles, anterior margin weakly sinuate,
margins weakly reflexed, lateral border and ocular can-
thus producing a distinct obtuse angle, surface fiat, coarse-
ly and very densely punctate, without setae; frontoclypeal
suture weakly impressed and moderately curved, smooth
area anterior to eyel .5 times as wide as long; ocular can-
thus short and wide, finely and densely punctate, with a
single, long terminal seta. Frons dull, coarsely and very
densely punctate, with a few long setae beside eyes. Eyes
moderately large, ratio of diameter/ interocular width:
0.66. Antenna with nine antennomeres, club with three an-
tennomeres, 5 times as long as remaining antennomeres
combined, club strongly reflexed. Mentum elevated and
Battened anteriorly.
Pronotum widest at base, lateral margins nearly straight
and evenly convergent anteriorly, in anterior third
moderately curved and more strongly convergent, anteri-
or angles acute, distinctly produced, posterior angles
moderately rounded, anterior margin weakly convex me-
dially, with a fine marginal line, basal margin without mar-
ginal line; surface with dense and coarse punctures,
glabrous, without impressions; anterior and lateral borders
sparsely setose; hypomeron carinate, basal margin of hy-
pomeron not produced. Scutellum subtriangular, apex
moderately rounded, with dense and coarse punctures,
glabrous.
Elytra oblong, widest at middle, striae weakly im-
pressed, with fine and dense punctures; intervals weakly
convex, with fine and dense punctures concentrated along
striae, except a few minute setae on lateral intervals
glabrous; epipleural edge strong, ending at strongly
rounded external apical angle of elytra, epipleura dense-
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 157-172
©ZFMK
168
Wan-Gang Liu et al.
ly setose, apical border membraneous, with short microtri-
chomes.
Ventral surface with large and dense punctures, except
a few erect setae on metasternal disc nearly glabrous;
metacoxa only laterally with a few robust, adpressed se-
tae. Mesosternum between mesocoxae as wide as mesofe-
mur, with numerous strong setae on an indistinct semicir-
cular carina. Ratio of length of metepistemum/ metacoxa:
1/ 1 .35. Abdominal sternites finely and densely punctate,
nearly glabrous, each stemite with a distinct transverse row
of coarse punctures each bearing a short robust seta. Py-
gidium weakly convex, with fine, dense punctures and a
few fine setae along apical margin, without smooth mid-
line.
Legs moderately long; femora with two longitudinal
rows of setae, finely and sparsely punctate; anterior edge
of metafemur acute with an adjacent, but partly interrupt-
ed serrated line, posterior ventral margin nearly straight,
weakly widened in apical half and not serrate, posterior
dorsal margin indistinctly serrate, densely setose. Metat-
ibia moderately wide and long, slightly widened behind
middle, ratio width/ length: 1/ 3.7, dorsal margin weakly
carinate, with two groups of spines, basal group shortly
before middle, apical one at three quarters of metatibial
length, with a few single setae in serrated punctures basal-
ly; lateral face longitudinally convex, with fine and sparse
punctures; ventral margin serrate; medial face impunctate
and smooth, apex sharply truncate interiorly near tarsal ar-
ticulation. Tarsomeres glabrous and impunctate dorsally,
with sparse, short setae ventrally, metatarsomeres with a
strongly serrated ridge ventrally, and longitudinal carina
immediately beside it, first metatarsomere as long as fol-
lowing two tarsomeres combined and one third of its
length longer than tibial spur. Protibia moderately long,
bidentate, external edge smooth, claws symmetrical.
Aedeagus: Fig. 3 E-G.
Diagnosis. The new species belongs to the Serica segre-
gatei Arrow, 1946 group. It differs from S.falcifera Ahrens
& Fabrizi, 2009 by the wider basal lobe of the right para-
mere, the sharply hooked dorsal lobe of left paramere, and
the longer antennal club. It is hard to say with a single
known specimen whether also the number of anten-
nomeres constitute a species-specific diagnostic feature to
distinguish from S. segregata and falcifera (both having
an antenna composed of ten antennomeres instead of nine).
Etymology. The new species is named after the collector
of the species, Li Fasheng.
Variation. Length: 9.2-10 mm, length of elytra: 7. 5-7. 7
mm, width: 5. 3-5. 6 mm.
Serica (s.l.) yadongensis Liu & Ahrens sp. n.
Type material examined. Holotype: S [China] “Yadong,
Xizang, 1. VII. 2004, leg. Ba Yibin, Shi Aimin’’ (HBUM).
Paratype: 1 S [China] “Xiasima, Yadong, Xizang,
14. VI. 1983, leg. Wang Jia, Ci Ren, No. 96-2” (IZAS).
Description. Length: 10 mm, length of elytra: 7.4 mm,
width: 4.6 mm. Body oblong, dark reddish brown, head
dark brown, antenna yellowish brown, dorsal surface dull,
elytra with irregular dark spots; head and pronotum with
long erect setae, elytra with minute to short white ad-
pressed setae.
Labroclypeus narrowly subtrapezoidal, widest at base, lat-
eral margins moderately convergent from base to moder-
ately rounded anterior angles, anterior margin weakly
sinuate, margins strongly reflexed, lateral border and oc-
ular canthus producing a distinct obtuse angle; surface flat
and moderately shiny, very coarsely and densely punctate,
larger punctures each bearing a long erect setae inter-
spersed with fine, glabrous punctures; frontoclypeal su-
ture moderately impressed and curved, smooth area an-
terior to eye 1.5 times as wide as long; ocular canthus
moderate long and robust, finely and densely punctate,
with a long terminal seta. Frons dull, finely and densely
punctate, with numerous long, erect setae. Eyes
moderately large, ratio of diameter/ interocular width: 0.7.
Antenna with ten antennomeres, club with three anten-
nomeres, 1.5 times as long as remaining antennomeres
combined, club slightly reflexed. Mentum elevated and
flattened anteriorly.
Pronotum widest at base, lateral margins in basal half
subparallel and slightly concavely sinuate, moderately
curved and strongly convergent in anterior third, anterior
angles bluntly rounded, moderately produced, anterior
margin nearly straight, with a fine marginal line, posteri-
or angles moderately round, basal margin without margin-
al line; surface with dense and fine punctures, midline im-
punctate, with several long erect setae bent posteriorly,
otherwise laterally with short, white or minute setae; an-
terior and lateral borders densely setose; hypomeron car-
inate, basal margin of hypomeron not produced. Scutel-
lum subtriangular, apex moderately rounded, with fine and
very dense punctures, glabrous, impunctate on midline.
Elytra oblong, widest at middle, striae moderately im-
pressed, with fine and dense punctures, reddish brown; in-
tervals moderately convex, second interval posteriorly
strongly widened, intervals with irregular, fine and dense
punctures, with fine, minute or short, scale-like, adpressed
setae concentrated along striae, punctation partly interrupt-
ed by large and dark impunctate spots; epipleural edge
moderately strong, ending at strongly rounded external
apical angle of elytra, epipleura densely setose, apical bor-
der membraneous, with a very fine rim of short microtri-
chomes.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 157-172
©ZFMK
Towards an improved knowledge of Sericini of the Tibetan highland: new species and records
169
Ventral surface with large and dense punctures, dense-
ly setose; metacoxa glabrous, only laterally with a few fine
adpressed setae. Mesostemum between mesocoxae as
wide as mesofemur. Ratio of length of metepistemum/
metacoxa: 1/ 1.5. Abdominal stern ites finely and moder-
ately densely punctate, punctures with minute setae, each
sternite with an indistinct transverse row of coarse punc-
tures each bearing a short, robust seta. Pygidium strong-
ly convex, with coarse, moderately dense punctures and
fine, long setae, midline smooth.
Legs slender and long; femora with two longitudinal
rows of setae, finely and sparsely punctate; anterior edge
of shiny metafemur acute, without an adjacent serrated
line, ventral posterior margin nearly straight, weakly
widened in apical half ventrally, not serrate, dorsal pos-
terior margin serrate and densely setose. Metatibia slen-
der and long, abruptly widened at apex, ratio width/ length:
1/ 4.2, dorsal margin longitudinally convex, with two
groups of spines, basal group at one third, apical one at
three quarters of metatibial length, with a few single se-
tae basally; lateral face longitudinally convex, with sparse
and moderately coarse punctures, some of them longitu-
dinally impressed, glabrous; ventral margin serrate, with
four equidistant spines; medial face impunctate and
smooth, apex sharply truncate interiorly near tarsal artic-
ulation. Tarsomeres glabrous and impunctate dorsally, with
sparse, short setae ventrally, metatarsomeres with a strong-
ly serrated ridge ventrally and a longitudinal carina im-
mediately beside it; first metatarsomere distinctly short-
er than following two tarsomeres combined and twice as
long as dorsal tibial spur. Protibia moderately long, biden-
tate, external edge smooth, claws symmetrical. Female un-
known.
Aedeagus: Fig. 3I-K.
Diagnosis. The new species differs from Serica erectose-
tosa Ahrens, 1999 by having nearly straight parameres
(lateral view), and from all other species of S. erectose-
tosa group by having long erect setae on head and prono-
tum, parameres are more strongly asymmetric as in S. kar-
naliensis Ahrens, 1999.
Etymology. The new species is named after the type lo-
cality, Yadong.
Variation. Length: 9.0-10.0 mm, length of elytra: 7. 0-7.4
mm, width: 4.6-5. 1 mm.
ADDITIONAL MATERIAL
Serica (s. str.) guidoi Ahrens, 1999
Additional material examined. I $ “Zhangmukou,
Nielamu, Xizang, 12.V. 1974, 2250m, leg. Zhang
Xuezhong” (IZAS).
Serica (s. str.) khajiaris Mittal, 1988
Additional material examined. 2 S “Yigong, Bomi,
Xizang, 14,22. VIII. 1983, 2300m, leg. Flan Yinheng”
(IZAS).
Serica (s. str.) kingdom Ahrens, 1999
Additional material examined. 1 $ “Qiujiaba, Wen
County, Gansu, 22. VII. 1999, 2350m, leg. Yao Jian”
(IZAS), 3 $ “Qiujiaba, Wen County, Gansu, 21. VI 1. 1999,
2350m, leg. He Tongli” (IZAS), 1 $ “Hailuo Gou, Moxi,
Luding, Sichuan, 9. VIII. 2004, 3000m, leg. Wan Xia,
Zhang Yong” (IZAS), 1 $ “Wolongguan Gou, Wo-
longzhen, Sichuan, 20. VII. 2004, 2150m, leg. Zhang Yong”
(IZAS), I S “Yaojiaping, Lushui, Yunnan, 2.VI.1981,
2500m, light trap, leg. Wang Shuyong” (IZAS), 1 <$ “San-
shenggou, Wolong, Sichuan, 8. VIII. 1983, 2500m, leg. Niu
Chunlai” (IZAS), 1 S “Chayu, Xizang, 22. VII. 2009, leg.
Ren Guodong etc.” (HBUM), 1 $ “Hailuogou, Moxi,
Luding, Sichuan, 8. VIII. 2004, 3000m, leg. Wan Xia”
(IZAS).
Serica (s. str.) montreuili Ahrens, 2005
Additional material examined. 1 <$ “Maxionggou, Xi-
angcheng, Sichuan, 25.VI.1982, 3800m, leg. Wang Shuy-
ong” (IZAS), 1 $ “Haizigou, Mts. Siguniangshan,
Sichuan, 29.VII.2004, 3400-3860m, leg. Bai Ming”
(IZAS), 1 $ “Shuangqiaogou, Mts. Siguniangshan,
Sichuan, 28. VII. 2004, 3840m, leg. Bai Ming” (IZAS), 1
<$ “Jiangda, Xizang, 28.VII.1976, 3400m, leg. Han Yin-
heng” (IZAS), 1 $ “Haitong, Mangkang, Xizang, 7, 8. VI-
II. 1983, 2950-3050m, leg. Lin Zai” (IZAS), 1 $ “Gelong,
Yushu, Qinghai, 10, 12. VII. 1964, 3700m, leg. Wang
Shuyong” (IZAS), 1 <S “Zhongreniao, Xiangcheng,
Sichuan, 17.VII.1982, 4100m, leg. Zhang Xuezhong”
(IZAS).
Serica (s. str.) nepalensis (Frey, 1969)
Additional material examined. 1 S “Zhangmu, Niela-
mu, 21.IV. 1974, 2250m, leg. Zhang Xuezhong” (IZAS),
1 $ “Jitang Youxi, Chaya, Xizang, 16. VIII. 1976, leg. Han
Yinheng” (IZAS), l <$ “Youyi Bridge, Nielamu, Xizang,
21.IV.1974, 1668m, leg. Zhang Xuezhong” (IZAS), 1 $
“Zhangmu, Nielamu, Xizang, 21.IV.1974, leg. Zhang
Xuezhong” (IZAS), 1 S, 1 $ “Zhangmukouan, Xizang,
28.VI.1975, 2250m, leg. Zhang Xuezhong” (IZAS).
Serica (s. str.) thibetana Brenske, 1897
Additional material examined. I $ “Youyi Brigde,
Nielamu, Xizang, 6. V. 1974, 1680m, light trap, leg.
Zhang Xuezhong” (IZAS), I <$ “Yadong, Xizang, 29. VI-
11.1980, 2700m, light trap, leg. Li Aihua” (IZAS), 1 S “Xi-
asima, Yadong, Xizang, 29. V. 1983, leg. Wang Jia, Ci Ren,
No. 98-3”(IZAS), 1 S “Yadong, Xizang, 29.V.1983,
2700m, light trap, leg. Li Aihua” (IZAS).
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 157-172
©ZFMK
170
Wan-Gang Liu et al.
O karnaliensis 90
-(- longefoliata
+ montreuili
□ nepalensis
• pygidialis ssp annapurnae
A thibetana
95 00
♦
35.00
30.00
O archolabrata O pacholatkoi
m beibengana a procera
♦ chayuensis ☆ rutilans
A ganeshi O sladeni
V lenangensis □ xizangensis
★ nielamuensis
30.00
0-1500
1500-2000
2000-3000
® 30004000
1 Wm 4000-9000
Fig. 4. Distribution and new records of: A: Calloserica bertiae, C. capillata , C. zhangmuensis, Gynaecoserica hani, G. lohiten-
si.s, G. yigongensis, Maladera modestula, M. siniaevi, Micmserica pruinosa. Mi. steelei , Pachyserica bituberculata. B: Serica (s.l.)
erectosetosa , S. (s.l .) fashengi, Serica (s.str.) guidoi , S. (s.str.) kingdom, S. (s.str.) yadongensis. C: S. (s.l.) karnaliensis, S. (s.str.)
montreuili, S. (s.str.) nepalensis, S. (s.str.) thibetana, Oxyserica longefoliata, O. pygidialis ssp. annapurnae. I): Lasioserica beiben-
gana, L. pacholatkoi, Neoserica lenangensis, N. sladeni, N. chayuensis, N. rutilans, N. xizangensis , Nepaloserica archolabrata,
Ne. ganeshi, Ne. nielamuensis , Ne. procera.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 157-172
©ZFMK
Towards an improved knowledge of Sericini of the Tibetan highland: new species and records
171
Serica (s. 1.) kamaliensis Ahrens, 1999
Additional material examined. 1 $ “Yadong, Xizang,
1. VII. 2004, leg. Ba Yibin, Shi Aimin’’ (HBUM).
Serica (s. I.) erectosetosa Ahrens, 1999
Additional material examined. I $ “Zhangmu, Niela-
mu, Xizang, 12.V.1974, 2250m, leg. Zhang Xuezhong”
(IZAS).
Pachyserica bituberculata Ahrens, 2006
Additional material examined. \<$ “Motuo, Xizang,
14.VIII.2003, 1100m, leg. Ren Guodong”(HBUM), 1 <$
“Maniweng, Motuo, Xizang, 28.VIII.1974, 930m, leg.
Huang Fusheng” (IZAS).
Calloserica bertiae Ahrens, 2000
Additional material examined. 1 <$ “Xiasima, Yadong,
Xizang, 8. VII. 1 983, leg. Wang Jia, Ci Ren” (IZAS).
Calloserica capillata Ahrens, 2005
Additional material examined. 1 “Zhangmu, Xizang,
28,30.VI.1975, 2400m, leg. Huang Fusheng, Wang
Ziqing” (IZAS), 1 <$ “Xiao Jilong, Jilong, Xizang,
20, 22. VII. 1975, 2800m, leg. Huang Fusheng” (IZAS).
Lasioserica (s. I.) pacholatkoi Ahrens, 2000
Additional material examined. 1 S “Yadong, Xizang,
27. VIII. 2003, 2900m, light trap, leg. Xue Huaijun, Wang
Xinpu” (NKU).
Neoserica (s. 1.) lenangensis Ahrens & Fabrizi, 2009
Additional material examined. 1 <$ “Bomi, Xizang,
3. IX. 1982, 3050m, leg. Han Yinheng” (IZAS).
Neoserica (s. 1.) rutilans Ahrens & Fabrizi, 2009
Additional material examined. 1 S, I $ “Yigong,
Xizang, 1 1,1 5. VI. 1978, 2300m. leg. Li Fasheng” (CAU).
Neoserica (s. I.) sladeni Ahrens, 2004
Additional material examined. 1 $ “Sangjiu, Chayu,
Xizang, 23. VI. 1973, 3000m, leg. Huang Fusheng” (IZAS).
Oxy serica longefoliata (Frey, 1965)
Additional material examined. 1 $ “Zhangmu, Xizang,
5-6.' VII. 2004, leg. Ba Yibin, Shi Aimin’’ (HBUM).
Oxyserica pygidialis ssp. annapurnae (Ahrens, 1995)
Additional material examined. 2 S- 2 $ “Jilong District,
Jilong County, Xizang, 19-20. VII. 1975, 2800m, leg.
Zhang Xuezhong” (IZAS), 1 1 9 “Xiaojilong, Jilong,
Xizang, 20.VII.I975, 2800m, leg. Huang Fusheng”
(IZAS), 1 S “Jilonggongshe, Xizang, 27. VII. 1984, leg. Pu
Qiongqiong” (IZAS).
Gynaecoserica lohitensis Ahrens & Fabrizi, 2009
Additional material examined. 1 S “Chayu, Xizang,
16-17.VII.2005, leg. Shi Aimin’’ (HBUM).
Microserica pruinosa (Hope, 1831)
Additional material examined. 1 <$ “Youyiqiao, Niela-
rnu, Xizang, 6. V. 1974, 1680m, leg. Zhang Xuezhong”
(IZAS).
Microserica steelei Ahrens, 2004
Additional material examined. I S, 1 9 “Shajiao,
Chayu, Xizang, 25.VI.1978, 1700m, leg. Li Fasheng”
(CAU).
Nepaloserica archolabrata Ahrens & Sabatinelli, 1996
Additional material examined. I <$ “Youyi Bridge,
Nielamu, Xizang, 7. V. 1974, 1680m, leg. Zhang
Xuezhong” (IZAS).
Nepaloserica ganeshi Ahrens, 1999
Additional material examined. 2 S “Jilong, Xizang,
1 1 .VI. 1978, 3150m, leg. Institute of Agricultural Sciences”
(IZAS), I S “Jilong Gongshe, Xizang, 16.VI.1984, leg.
Yan Zhaoxing, Pu Qiongqiong” (IZAS), 1 S “Tongmai,
Jilong, Xizang, 25.V1.1984, leg. Yan Zhaoxing” (IZAS).
Nepaloserica procera procera Frey, 1965
Additional material examined. 1 $ “Qu County, Zhang-
mu, Xizang, 6. VII. 1 975, 3400m, leg. Zhang Xuezhong”
(IZAS), 2 S “Quxiang, Zhangmu, Xizang, 6. VII. 1 975,
3300m, 3400m, leg. Huang Fusheng, Zhang Xuezhong”
(IZAS), 1 S “Jilong Gongshe, Jilong, Xizang, 22. V. 1982,
leg. Li Baoming, Wangjia, Daci” (IZAS).
Maladera modestula (Brenske, 1902)
Additional material examined. “Beibeng, Motuo,
Xizang, 21 .V.1983, 700-800m, leg. Han Yinheng” (IZAS),
1 ^ “Beibeng, Motuo, Xizang, 25. V.1983, 850m, leg. Han
Yinheng” (IZAS).
Maladera siniaevi Ahrens, 2004
Additional material examined. 1 ex. “Beibeng, Motuo,
Xizang, 29.V.1983, 800-900m, leg. Han Yinheng” (IZAS).
Acknowledgements. This research was supported by the Na-
tional Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (No.
201 1CB302I02), the National Natural Science Foundation of
China (Nos. 31010103913, 31172143), the Knowledge Inno-
vation Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No.
KSCX3-IOZ-1004), and by a Fellowship (to M.B.) from
Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. Additionally we thank
Prof. Wang Xinli (CAU), Prof. Pang Hong (LSSYU) and
Prof. Ren Guodong (HBUM) for the loan of unidentified
Sericini to Yang Xingke and Liu Wangang.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 157-172
©ZFMK
172
Wan-Gang Liu et al.
REFERENCES
Ahrens D (2004) Monographs der Sericini des Himalaya
(Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Dissertation.de. Verlag im Inter-
net GmbH, Berlin, 534 pp.
Ahrens D (2005a) A taxonomic review on the Serica (s. str.)
MacLeay, 1819 species of Asiatic mainland (Coleoptera,
Scarabaeidae, Sericini). Nova Supplementa Entomologica 18:
1-163
Ahrens D (2005b) A preliminary cladistic analysis of Nip-
ponoserica , with implications on phylogenetic relationships
among sericine chafers (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). System-
atics and Biodiversity 3: 265-279
Ahrens D (2005c) Taxonomic revision of the genus Anomalo-
phylla Reitter, 1887 (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae: Sericini).
Zootaxa 1076: 1-62
Ahrens D (2005d) The diversification of the endemic Himalayan
monsoon-season beetles genus Calloserica inferred from a
cladistic analysis (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Sericini). Inver-
tebrate Systematics 19: 217-230
Ahrens D (2005e) New material of the genus Lasioserica
Brenske, 1896 with the description of four new species
(Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Sericini). Linzer Biologische
Beitrage 37: 771-781
Ahrens D (2006a) Phylogenetic analysis of Anomalophylla Re-
itter, 1887 (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae: Sericini). Insect System-
atics and Evolution 37: 1-16
Ahrens D (2006b) The phylogeny of the genus Lasioserica in-
ferred from adult morphology - implications on the evolution
of montane fauna of the South Asian orogenic belt
(Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Sericini). Journal of Zoological
Systematics and Evolutionary Research 44: 34-53
Ahrens D (2006c) Additional data on taxonomy and distribution
on Sericini of the Himalayas, with description a further new
species of Maladera (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). pp. 409-^11 8.
In: Hartmann, M. and Baumbach, H. (eds. ): Biodiversitdt and
Naturausstattung im Himalaya. Verein der Freunde und
Forderer des Naturkundemuseums Erfurt e.V., Erfurt
Ahrens D (2006d) Evolution of Asian ‘lowland’ taxa and Alpine-
Himalayan Tertiary orogenic belt - Insight from a preliminary
cladistic analysis of Maladera (Cycloserica) (Coleoptera:
Scarabaeidae: Sericini). Zoologischer Anzeiger 244: 193-203
Ahrens D (2006e) Revision und phylogenetische Analyse der
Gattung Pachyserica Brenske, 1897 (Coleoptera, Melolonthi-
dae, Sericini). Revue Suisse de Zoologie 1 13: 487-557
Ahrens D (2006f) Cladistic analysis of Maladera ( Omaladera ):
implications on taxonomy, evolution and biogeography of the
Himalayan species (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Sericini). Or-
ganisms, Diversity and Evolution 6: 1-16
Ahrens D (2007a) Cladistic analysis of Sericania (Coleoptera,
Scarabaeidae: Sericini) - implications on the evolution of the
xerophilous fauna of the Himalaya. European Journal of En-
tomology 104: 517-530
Ahrens D (2007b) Beetle evolution in the Asian highlands: in-
sight from a phylogeny of the scarabaeid subgenus Serica
(Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Systematic Entomology 32:
450-476
Ahrens D, Pacholatko P (2005) Zwei neue Allen aus der Gruppe
der Amiserica insperata (Brenske, 1898) aus dem
nordostlichen Indien und Myanmar (Coleoptera, Scarabaei-
dae, Sericini). Koleopterologische Rundschau 75: 311-317
Ahrens D & Fabrizi, S. (2009a) New species of Sericini from
the Eastern Himalaya and Tibet (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae):
249-284. In: Hartmann, M. and Weipert, M. (eds.): Biodiver-
sitdt und Naturausstattung im Himalaya III. Verein der Fre-
unde und Forderer des Naturkundemuseums Erfurt e.V., Er-
furt
Ahrens D & Fabrizi S (2009b) A review on the genus Gynae-
coserica Brenske, 1897 (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Sericini).
Journal of Natural History 43: 1505-1584
Ahrens D & Fabrizi S (2011) New species of Sericini from the
Himalaya and adjacent mountains (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae).
Bonn zoological Bulletin 60: 139-164
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 157-172
©ZFMK
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 173-187
December 20 1 4
Neotropical primates from the Cologne Zoo in the collections of the
Zoologisches Forschiingsmuseum Alexander Koenig:
noteworthy specimens, taxonomic notes and general considerations
Gustav Peters Tamja Haus 2,3 & Rainer Hutterer 1
1 Department of Vertebrates, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, D-53113 Bonn, Germany;
E-mail: g.peters@zfmk.de
2 Primate Genetics Laboratoiy, 3 Cognitive Ethology’ Laboratoiy, German Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for
Primate Research, Kellnerweg 4,
D-37077 Goettingen, Germany; E-mail: THaus@dpz.eu
Abstract. Cologne Zoo was a major place for the captive care of primates of the family Pitheciidae in the second half
of the last century. Various species of the genera Cacajao , Chiropotes and Pithecia , which until then had a poor survival
record in human care, lived at the Cologne Zoo for years. This offered the unique possibility to gather important infor-
mation on their biology and care in captivity. Moreover several individuals were featured in a diverse array of technical
publications and/or were mentioned in respective texts. However, at that time knowledge on the taxonomy of South Amer-
ican primates was still incomplete. New species and subspecies were named, some of which were kept in the zoo unno-
ticed. After their death Cologne Zoo donated specimens as vouchers to the Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander
Koenig. We evaluate their species identity in the context of the ongoing debate on the taxonomy of these three genera
and also address the potential importance of zoo specimens for the scientific study of taxonomic and biological ques-
tions. Furthermore, based on our data the status of Chiropotes israelita and C. sagulatus as valid species is questioned.
Key words. Primates, Pitheciidae, Neotropics, zoo biology, museum vouchers, taxonomy, identification.
INTRODUCTION
From the very beginning of the existence of zoological
museums, menageries and zoos have been an important
source of specimens for their collections, especially for
exotic species (Jalm 1994; Landsberg 1994; Oppermann
1994). Compared to specimens collected in their natural
distribution area (with appropriate documentation) those
originating from captivity usually have shortcomings in
respect of their informative value, significance as vouch-
ers, and thus also for many research topics typically car-
ried out in zoological museums. Although here is not the
place to discuss this in detail, specimens in museum col-
lections that come from a zoo can be important in vari-
ous aspects. Here we address this issue exemplarily for a
few Neotropical primate specimens in the mammal col-
lections of the Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexan-
der Koenig, Bonn (ZFMK) that were donated by the
Cologne Zoo after the animals had deceased. The present
report is also a supplement to the catalogue of mammalian
types and other important voucher specimens in the ZFMK
(Hutterer & Peters 2010).
Two recent publications (Pauly 2010; Pagel & SpieB
201 1) animated us to write the present report and to put
forward some general considerations in this context. Pauly
(2010) discussed the species determination of a primate
Received: 20.01.2014
Accepted: 08.09.2014
individual that lived in Cologne Zoo between 1974 and
1 992 in view of a recently published taxonomic reassess-
ment of the black-headed uacari ( Cacajao
melanocephalus ; Boubli et al. 2008). Pagel & SpieB (201 1 )
provided a complete list of all mammal (sub-) species kept
at Cologne Zoo since its opening in 1 860 with contem-
porary and current scientific names. By discussing spe-
cific examples within a wider perspective we hope to in-
crease awareness both in zoological museums and zoos
that the lasting deposition of deceased zoo specimens in
a zoological museum and their subsequent scientific cu-
ration is the most reasonable ‘fate’ for zoologically im-
portant/interesting specimens of such origin. Only in do-
ing so their significance can be saved and their sustained
scientific use warranted. The same issue was addressed
by Gippoliti & Bruner (2007) and Gippoliti & Kitchener
(2007) in particular.
BACKGROUND
Cologne Zoo was a major place for the captive care of pri-
mates of the family Pitheciidae (taxonomy as in Groves
2005) outside their natural range in South America for sev-
Corresponding editor: J. Decher
174
Gustav Peters et al.
eral decades in the second half of the last century (cf. Hick
1965b, 1966, 1968a, b, 1973, 1974; Hershkovitz 1985,
1987a, b). Various species of the genera Cacajao , Chi-
vopotes and Pithecia , for which relatively little informa-
tion was available at that time and which until then had
a poor survival record in human care, lived at the zoo for
years and important information on their biology and care
in captivity was gathered and published (Hick 1965b,
1966, 1968a, b). Hershkovitz (1985: 1 7) named a new sub-
species of bearded saki Chiropotes satanas utahicki after
Ms. Uta Hick (subsequently and correctly, the name was
changed to utahickae , following the International Code of
Zoological Nomenclature; ICZN 1999), the then-curator
of primates at Cologne Zoo. Hershkovitz (1985) did so to
acknowledge her achievements in the captive care of
Pitheciidae and of her major contributions to the knowl-
edge of these primates. Photos of several live individuals
of these three genera from Cologne Zoo were presented
in technical publications and/or they were mentioned in
their text (e.g. Hill 1960; Napier & Napier 1967; Mitter-
meier & Coimbra-Filho 1981; van Roosmalen et al. 1981;
Hershkovitz 1985, 1987 a, b). At that time the taxonomy
of Cacajao, Chiropotes and Pithecia was far from being
settled (Hershkovitz 1985, 1987 a, b). In the context of
the recent 'revival’ of the debate on the taxonomy of Chi-
ropotes (Boubli 2002; Silva-Jr. & Figueiredo 2002; Boli-
viano et al. 2003; Veiga et al. 2008; Ferrari et al. 2013;
Silva-Jr. et al. 2013), Cacajao (Boubli et al. 2008; Ferrari
et al. 2013; Silva-Jr. et al. 2013) and Pithecia (Marsh 2004,
2006, 2014), some specimens of these taxa, which the
ZFMK received from Cologne Zoo, regain significance.
Unfortunately, the ZFMK received only a minor fraction
of the individuals that lived in the Cologne Zoo between
1954 and 2005, and for none of these specimens verifi-
able data as to their geographic origin are available. There-
fore statements with respect to agreement/disagreement
of their characteristics with those reported for specimens
from specific geographic areas are made conditionally. A
revision of the genus Pithecia (Flershkovitz 1987b) in-
cludes a photo of a live individual of this genus from
Cologne Zoo. Although it was not given to the ZFMK af-
ter its death, it will be addressed in the present report as
well to indicate the potential importance of such zoo spec-
imens for the scientific community.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Our study is based on the voucher specimens of Neotrop-
ical primates deposited in the mammal collections of Zo-
ologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig
(ZFMK MAM). Species of Cacajao , Chiropotes and
Pithecia that originated from Cologne Zoo were analysed
in the context of published and unpublished zoo records
and photographs made available by the zoo archivists R.
Becker and W. SpieB. We are aware of the limited signif-
icance of photos in drawing fully substantiated conclusions
as to the ‘actual’ colour in cases where (fur) colour char-
acteristics are diagnostic criteria for the differentiation of
taxa and will address this issue where relevant. The same
applies to the fading and possible change of colours in
long-term museum specimens, especially those on exhib-
it.
Nomenclature
English common names of taxa used in the present pub-
lication are those given in the primate chapter of Mam-
mal Species of the World (Groves 2005). Some names
coined in Ferrari et al. (2013) are in conflict with the tax-
onomic views expressed here. Vernacular names with ad-
jective characterizations of the species' body coat colour
are adopted with reservations because they imply that it
is a diagnostic character. This can be delusive, though, as
will be detailed below.
Molecular methods
DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing
To determine a questionable Chiropotes specimen from
Cologne Zoo (ZFMK_MAM_2008.244), whose species
affiliation could not be clearly determined based on ex-
ternal characters, we extracted DNA from a small piece
of skin in the ancient DNA laboratory at York Universi-
ty following the protocol of Haus et al. (2013). We used
0.09 mg sample and incubated it for about 24h in 1.5 ml
of a Guanidinium thiocyanate (GuSCN) buffer (5M
GuSCN, 25 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris, 20 mM EDTA, 1%
Tween 20, 1% beta-mercaptoethanol), which was modi-
fied from Rohland et al. (2004). To purify the DNA we
applied a combination of a batch-based silica and a col-
umn-based method according to Rohland & Hofreiter
(2007) and Rohland et al. (2010). Finally we eluted the
DNA in 50 pi TE buffer. To monitor for possible contam-
ination we additionally performed a blank extraction with-
out sample.
To compare our data with already published sequences
of other Chiropotes taxa we amplified and sequenced a
390 bp long fragment of the cytochrome (cyt) b gene. Boli-
viano et al. (2003) used a 372 base pair (bp) long frag-
ment of the cyt b gene to distinguish between different
species of Chiropotes. Accordingly, we amplified the same
cyt b fragment using primers Cytb fwTGATATGAAA-
AACCATCGTTG (modified from Bonvicino et al. 2001)
and Cytb rvACCTATAAATGCTGTAGCTAT in a 20 pi
mix (3 U AmpliTaq Gold 360 (Applied Biosystems, Ger-
many), lx reaction buffer, 2 mM MgC^, 0.25 mM for
each dNTP, 0.75 pM for each primer, and 0. 1 mg/ml BSA)
and following PCR conditions: 94°C for 10 min, followed
by 60 cycles of 94°C for 30 s 62°C for 45 s, 72°C 45 s.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 173-187
©ZFMK
Neotropical primates from the Cologne Zoo in the collections of the Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum A. Koenig 175
and 72°C for 5 min. Due to the length of our amplified
product (390 bp) and the usually high degradation of DNA
retrieved from museum samples, the possibility that our
sequence represents a putative nuclear insertion of mito-
chondrial DNA (numt) is low. To control for possible con-
tamination with modem DNA, the PCR reaction was con-
ducted with two PCR blanks (HPLC-purified water) in ad-
dition to the extraction blank. We ran the PCR product on
a 1.5% agarose gel, and purified it with the Qiagen Gel
Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Germany) after excision. Subse-
quently, forward and reverse sequences were run on an
ABI 3 1 30 xL sequencer using the BigDye Terminator Cy-
cle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Germany) and
respective primers. The Cliiropotes sequence can be down-
loaded from GenBank (GenBank accession number:
KF989492).
Phylogenetic analysis
To examine phylogenetic relationships we used se-
quences of six related taxa as outgroups ( Alouatta belze-
bul AF2895 15, Saimiri sciureus U53582, Callicebus per-
sonatus AF289988, Callicebus donacophilus FJ85423,
Cacajao melanocephalus AY226184, Pithecia irrorata
AY226183) and further included all Cliiropotes cyt b se-
quences available from GenBank: Cliiropotes albinasus :
KC757393; C. utahickae : AY226185, AY226186; C. is-
raelita: AY226187-AY226190; C. chiropotes/sagulatus :
FJ53 1667). We used the same Cliiropotes sequences as in
Bonvicino et al. (2003), except for Cliiropotes albinasus
(Finstermeier et al. 2013) and the cyt b gene of C. chi-
ropotes/ sagulatus from Rio Trombetas east of Rio Bran-
co (Figueiredo-Ready et al. 2013). All sequences were
aligned using the program Mega 5.0 (Tamura et al. 201 1 ).
We also used Mega 5.0 to check for putative numts; we
translated all sequences into amino acid sequences to de-
tect possible unexpected stop codons in our alignment,
which was not the case. Best fit nucleotide substitution
models were estimated with jModeltest (Guindon & Gas-
cuel 2003; Posada 2008) and chosen based on the Akaike
Information Criterion (AIC). Correspondingly, we used
the TrN+G model to reconstruct neighbor-joining (NJ;
Mega 5.0, Tamura et al. 2011), maximum-likelihood (ML;
Garli 2.0, Zwickl 2006; Paup*4bl0, Swofford 1993) and
Bayesian (MrBayes 3.1.2, Huelsenbeck et al. 2001, Ron-
quist & Huelsenbeck 2003 ) phylogenetic trees. For NJ and
ML we used 1 000 and 500 bootstrap replications, respec-
tively. We applied 10 million generations for the Bayesian
approach and sampled parameters every 10,000 genera-
tions; the first 25% of sampled trees and parameters were
discarded as bum in. Phylogenetic trees were finally vi-
sualized and edited in FigTree 1.4.0 (Rambaut 2008).
RESULTS & DISCUSSION
Cacajao Lesson, 1840
After the past argument on whether red and white uacaris
are the same or different species (Napier & Napier 1 967;
Chiarelli 1972) had been provisionally settled (Her-
shkovitz 1972, 1987a), the genus was generally consid-
ered to include two species, the black-headed uacari Ca-
cajao melanocephalus (Humboldt, 1811) (not 1 8 12, as in
Groves 2005), and the bald uacari Cacajao calvus (I. Ge-
offrey, 1847), the latter encompassing the white and the
red form (Barnett & Brandon-Jones 1997; Groves 2001,
2005; Barnett 2005). More recently, based on genetic,
morphological and ecological data Boubli et al. (2008) de-
scribed two new species of black-headed uacari, Cacajao
hosomi Boubli et al., 2008, and Cacajao ayresi Boubli et
al.. 2008. Moreover, they argued that ouakary( Spix, 1823)
presents a junior synonym of melanocephalus according
to the original description of pelage colour of both spec-
imens, the uncertainty of the type locality of Humboldt’s
specimen of melanocephalus and to the now knowledge
of the geographical distribution of different pelage patterns
in this group. This taxonomic arrangement was not fol-
lowed by Ferrari et al. (2010) and Silva-Jr. et al. (2013),
who proposed to recognise three species Cacajao calvus ,
C. melanocephalus and C. ouakary (Ferrari et al. 2010),
and additionally the newly described species Cacajao
ayresi Boubli et al., 2008 (Silva-Jr. et al. 2013). Howev-
er, since no published data exist to support findings of Fer-
rari, Silva-Jr. and colleagues, for now we will retain the
taxonomy of Boubli et al. (2008). Their publication is al-
so relevant for a specimen the ZFMK received from
Cologne Zoo, which we will discuss below in more de-
tail.
Cacajao melanocephalus (Humboldt, 1811) sensu lato
- Black-headed uacari
According to the annual animal registers of Cologne Zoo
(SpieB, pers. comm. 2011; Becker, pers. comm. 2011) two
individuals were received in 1958 and one in 1959. All
three individuals only lived for a short time and no more
specific documentation for these specimens is left. Fur-
ther, no material was transferred to a zoological museum
or another scientific institution after their death. Therefore
it is not possible to retroactively assess their actual species
identity in the light of the recent publication of Boubli et
al. (2008).
Cacajao hosomi Boubli ct al. 2008 - Neblina uacari
Material: ZFMK_MAM_2002.032; adult male, received
by Cologne Zoo 15.111. 1974, f 23. IX. 1992, carcass passed
to ZFMK on 12.VI.I997; skull, postcranial skeleton.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 173-187
©ZFMK
176
Gustav Peters et al.
In 1974 the zoo received another individual of black-head-
ed uacari from Venezuela, a male (Windecker 1975),
which lived until 1992, the highest longevity recorded for
a black-headed uacari (Weigl 2005). Published photo-
graphs of the animal, then identified as Cacajao
melanocephalus , show this male at various stages of its
life (Hick 1974; Mittermeier and Coimbra-Filho 1981;
Pauly 20 1 0). In a black-and-white photograph of the adult
individual taken in 1985 by Hershkovitz (1987a: 30, fig.
16) it is identified as Cacajao melanocephalus ouakary
(Spix, 1823). The diagnostic back pelage colouration of
this subspecies given by Hershkovitz (1987a: 25) as ‘Mid-
back pale orange, golden or buffy and contrasted with red-
dish brown or tawny of lower back and thighs’ was not
present in this individual, though (cf. colour photographs
of it mentioned subsequently), i.e. its subspecies identi-
fication is unfounded. Colour photographs taken subse-
quently, observations of the live animal by one of us (G.P.)
and of the carcass revealed no orange tinge on the back
at all. It is possible that this mistake slipped in on the oc-
casion of the later subspecies identification based on the
black-and-white photograph of Hershkovitz (1987a) as the
animal’s back seems brightened because of the lighting
conditions when the photo was taken and/or the exposure
time used.
Only after the publication of Boubli et al. (2008) it be-
came evident that this uacari individual at Cologne Zoo
belonged to the newly described species Cacajao hoso-
mi Boubli et al., 2008 (Pauly 2010). Therefore, the com-
mon name proposed by its authors is used here. Various
colour photographs of the live individual in publications
by Cologne Zoo (zoo guides, title page of the journal
‘Zeitschrift des Kolner Zoo’ 26(4), 1983) and in Pauly
(2010: 186, Abb. 6) support its identification as C. hoso-
mi in showing its diagnostic colouration (Boubli et al.
[2008]: fig. 3: 4, 5, p. 737 [description]): ‘ fur with bright
reddish brown mid to lower back, thighs and tail, in con-
trast to Araca black uacari specimens that have a much
darker general coloration and to C. melanocephalus as re-
defined here, which present a golden brown general ap-
pearance.’
Chiropotes Lesson, 1840
Contrary to an earlier statement by Mittermeier & Coim-
bra-Filho (1981: 74) that ‘[t]he genus Chiropotes . . . does
not present any particular problems’, the species status of
various taxa of Chiropotes satanas (Hoffmannsegg,
1 807) sensu lato has been the subject of recurring discus-
sions (Hershkovitz 1985; Rylands et al. 1995; Rylands et
al. 2000; Groves 2001 , 2005; Silva-Jr. & Figueiredo 2002;
Bonvicino et al. 2003; Figueiredo et al. 2006; Veiga et al.
2008; Rylands & Mittermeier 2009; Ferrari et al. 2013;
Silva-Jr. et al. 2013). As the diagnostic characteristics
(nasal region and upper lip flesh-coloured, with whitish
or yellowish hairs [Hershkovitz 1985]) of Chiropotes al-
binasus (1. Geoffroy and Deville, 1848) are clearly defined
and unambiguously observable, its status as a distinct
species has not been debated (Hill 1960; Chiarelli 1972;
Napier 1976; Hershkovitz 1985; Groves 2001, 2005).
Based on the taxonomic review of Hershkovitz ( 1985), in
which he also described the new subspecies Chiropotes
satanas utahicki , all other taxa of the genus Chiropotes
were likewise classified as subspecies of Chiropotes sa-
tanas by subsequent authors (e.g. Rylands et al. 1995,
2000; Rowe 1996; Groves 2001).
By contrast, Chiropotes a/binasus, C. satanas , C. chi-
ropotes, and C. utahickae were regarded as distinct species
by Bonvicino et al. (2003). Moreover, these authors list-
ed Chiropotes israelita (Spix, 1823), the brown-backed
bearded sakis of northwestern Brazil, north of the Rio Ne-
gro and west of the Rio Branco, as an additional species.
In the primate chapter of ‘Mammal Species of the World’
Groves (2005) adopted this view, a procedure not followed
by Norconk (2007) who like Hershkovitz ( 1985) or Groves
(2001 ) listed only two species in the genus, C. albinasus
and C. satanas. Both last-mentioned authors regarded is-
raelita as a synonym of Chiropotes satanas chiropotes.
More recently, Silva-Jr. et al (2013) and Ferrari et al.
(2013) supported a five species concept as proposed by
Bonvicino et al. (2003), but they considered the taxon west
of the Rio Branco to be Chiropotes chiropotes and that
east of the river to be Chiropotes sagulatus (Traill, 1821).
There are no published data so far that clearly underpin
the taxonomic conclusions of Ferrari et al. (2013) and Sil-
va-Jr. et al. (2013) preventing us from drawing any final
conclusions on the taxonomy of Chiropotes.
Bonvicino et al. (2003) explicated in detail why they
consider the genus Chiropotes to include five distinct
species and why the name israelita ought to be applied
to the Rio Negro population, as also done by Boubli &
de Lima (2009). The remarks of Bonvicino et al. (2003)
in this latter context contain two material misapprehen-
sions, though: 1. There is no substantial evidence that
Spix’s (1823: 1 1-12) original description of Brachyurus
israelita (first in Latin and then in French) refers to two
different specimens as claimed by Bonvicino et al. (2003:
1 32). The specification of the type locality in the Latin text
as ‘Habitat ad Rio-Negro’ (p. 11) and that - as opposed
to this - at the end of the more detailed French text (p.
12) as ‘On trouve ce singe vers le Perou dans les forets
de Japura riviere laterale de Solimoens’ must have been
an error in the case of the latter statement since there is
not a single record known for the occurrence of bearded
sakis south-west of the Rio Negro (Hershkovitz 1985;
Veiga et al. 2008; Ferrari et al. 2013; Silva-Jr. et al. 2013).
Therefore we argue that this information cannot be taken
as evidence of the existence of two different specimens
on which the respective descriptions were based. Indeed,
there is also no clear difference between characters de-
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 173-187
©ZFMK
Neotropical primates from the Cologne Zoo in the collections of the Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum A. Koenig 177
tailed in the Latin text of Spix’s ( 1823) original descrip-
tion of Brachyurus israelita and those described in the sub-
sequent French text as claimed by Bonvicino et al. (2003).
Furthermore, there is no indication for the (past) existence
of a second specimen of bearded saki in the Spix collec-
tion (M. Hienneier, ZSM, pers. comm. 2012). 2. Contrary
to the assumption/statement of Bonvicino et al. (2003:
132) that the holotype specimen of Brachyurus israelita
Spix, 1 823 is lost, it is preserved in the collection of the
Zoologische Staatssammlung Miinchen (ZSM) (Kraft
1983); pertinent information as well as its colour photo
are available on the internet (see http:// www.zsm.mwn.de/
mam/ptypes.htm, and http://www.zsm. mwn.de/mam/i/
Brachyurus israelita 34 D.jpg). Additional colour pho-
tos of the holotype specimen of Brachyurus israelita Spix,
1 823, kindly provided by M. Hienneier (cf. Fig. 1 ), show
the typical coat colouration of Chiropotes satanas chi-
ropotes as given in the key to the geographic forms of Chi-
ropotes ( Hershkovitz 1985: 13): ‘Head, nape, lower aims,
and legs blackish, sharply contrasted with orange of dor-
sum’.
Moreover, the statement by Bonvicino et al. (2003: 131)
that ‘... Hershkovitz [1985] commented that there was no
assigned C. s. chiropotes holotype or type locality. ’ is for-
mulated inappropriately and mistakable. In listing the type
locality of Simia chiropotes as ‘Said to be the upper Rio
Orinoco south of the cataracts, Amazonas, Venezuela’ ac-
cording to Humboldt (1811) and in stating that the type
is not preserved (i.e. was lost during its transport from
South America to Europe), as already reported by Hum-
boldt (1811), Hershkovitz (1985: 16) rendered the issue
correctly. Thus, all available evidence supports the per-
ception that Chiropotes israelita (Spix, 1823) is a junior
synonym of Chiropotes chiropotes (Humboldt, 1811).
Shortly before the study by Bonvicino et al. (2003) was
published Silva-Jr. & Figueiredo (2002) had reintroduced
the name Chiropotes sagulatus (Traill, 1821 ), originally
described from Guiana, as a distinct species. Bonvicino
et al. (2003: 132) thereupon argued ‘Silva-Jr. and
Figueiredo (2002) recently proposed species status for C.
sagulatus ; however, they did not provide sufficient data
to justify that taxonomic arrangement. ’ Therefore Bon-
vicino et al. (2003) did not list sagulatus as a distinct
species of Chiropotes. Husson (1957, 1978), in previous
specific surveys of the mammal fauna of Guiana, had treat-
ed sagulatus as a synonym of Chiropotes satanas chi-
ropotes, like most other authors of later pertinent techni-
cal publications (e.g. Hershkovitz 1985; Groves, 2001,
2005). Bonvicino et al. (2003) rightly pointed out that no
substantial data - in effect no specific data at all - was
presented by Silva-Jr. & Figueiredo (2002) in the pub-
lished abstract of their contribution to the Xth Congres-
so Brasileiro dc Primatologia and that therefore this ab-
stract cannot be the proper basis for the resurrection of
sagulatus as a distinct species. On the other hand, this does
not rule out that the study of Silva-Jr. & Figueiredo (2002)
underlying their congress contribution yielded data sup-
porting such a view. In return, it does not have any rele-
vance in supporting the view of Bonvicino et al. (2003)
that the name israelita ought to be applied to the Chi-
ropotes population west of the Rio Branco and north of
the Rio Negro, and that it represents a distinct species.
Unlike Groves (2005) who adopted the concept of Bon-
vicino et al. (2003) in its entirety, a more recent review
of the diversity of New World primates (Rylands & Mit-
termeier 2009: 40-41 ) pointed out that the cause of such
discrepancies may be ‘ . . . a possible confusion concern-
ing the correct names.’ Indeed, the distribution map pub-
lished by Bonvicino et al. (2003: 125, fig. 1) shows lo-
calities of Chiropotes satanas chiropotes only consider-
ably east of the Rio Branco in Brazil. All localities west
of it and north of the Rio Negro are entered as Chiropotes
sp. The locality of a ‘possibly new taxon of Chiropotes''
reported by Boubli (2002) and previously mentioned by
Rylands et al. (2000) is still further northwest, close to the
southernmost border of Venezuela. All these locality
records are within the distribution range of Chiropotes sa-
tanas chiropotes as given by Hershkovitz ( 1985: 2, Fig.
1 ). In applying the name israelita to their ‘new form of
Chiropotes' the taxonomic views of Bonvicino et al.
(2003) were apparently put forward without observance
of the statement of the type locality (‘On les trouve dans
les vastes deserts de l’Alto-Orinoco, an sud et a Test des
Cataractes.’) in Humboldt’s (1811: 313) original descrip-
tion of Simia chiropotes. It is usually rendered as upper
Rio Orinoco, south of the cataracts, Amazonas State,
Venezuela (Cabrera 1961; Hershkovitz 1985; Groves
2001, 2005). Incidentally, the Chiropotes sp. individual
from the lower Rio Marauia, Amazonas, Brazil, reported
and pictured in a colour photograph by Boubli (2002: fig.
3) clearly shows the typical coat colouration of Chiropotes
satanas chiropotes as listed by Hershkovitz (1985: 13).
The conclusion of Bonvicino et al. (2003: 129) that of the
four Chiropotes taxa they studied the western two differ
in dorsal coat colour (tawny-olive to buffy-brown in the
westernmost versus orange or ochraceus in the eastern tax-
on) obviously contravenes that by Hershkovitz ( 1985: 17):
‘All types of chromatic variation are fully intergrading and
may occur in the same population. Geographic variation
is not evident.’ Of the original descriptions of the rele-
vant Chiropotes taxa named, only the one of israelita (Spix
1823: 11-12) is sufficiently detailed (in its subsequent
French version) to provide pertinent information in this
respect: ‘Les poils du dos sont tres epais, peu longs, d’un
roux jaunatre, ceux des cotes d’un fauve plus fonce’. This
clearly indicates a ‘reddish-yellowish’ hue of the back fur
(as still detectable in the type specimen, see Fig. 1 ). Aside
from the question whether israelita is a synonym of chi-
ropotes there can be no doubt that its type locality places
israelita into the westernmost form of bearded saki. So,
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 173-187
©ZFMK
178
Gustav Peters et al.
Fig. 1-3. 1. (Left) Back view of the mounted type specimen of Brachyuras israelita Spix, 1823 in the Zoologische Staaatssamm-
lung Miinchen ZSM (Photo: M. Hienneier, ZSM). 2. (Center) Back view of mounted adult male Chiropotes chiropotes specimen
ZFMK_MAM_66.001 (Photo: M. Weigt). 3. (Right) Tanned skin of Chiropotes sp. specimen ZFMK_MAM_2008.244 (Photo: M.
Weigt).
a reddish/orange tinge of the dorsal pelage colour may al-
so be present in this population.
Gregory (201 1 ) who kindly provided colour photos of
living bearded sakis from Suriname opines that these an-
imals have ‘a much brighter orange dorsum’ (visible in the
photos) than the more western populations of bearded
sakis (pers. comm. 2012); she uses the name Chiropotes
sagulatus for them (Gregory 2011; Gregory & Norconk
201 1). Concerning dorsal pelage colour the original de-
scription of Simia sagulatus , the Guianan bearded saki,
states ‘back well clothed with an ochry-coloured fur’
(Traill 1821: 167), and in more detail (p. 168) ‘The colour
is brightest on the shoulders, where it is intermediate be-
tween wood-brown and yellowish-brown; and, on the back
and sides, passes into the latter.’ Traill (1821: 1 69) express-
ly states that these characteristics equally apply to live
more specimens from the same geographical area (Demer-
ara/Demerary in today’s Guayana; originally a Dutch col-
onization area, later occupied by the British) as the holo-
type. Husson ( 1 978: 210) describes the colour of the back
pelage of nine Chiropotes satanas chiropotes specimens
from Suriname as ‘. . . a dull brownish colour varying from
yellowish umber to mummy brown.’ which suggests quite
some variation in this (distinctive?) character even
among individuals from within a restricted portion of the
distribution range of this taxon. Apart from colour fading
likely to have occurred in museum specimens, these dis-
crepancies may be due to differences in the relative cov-
erage of the whole distribution range of Chiropotes sa-
tanas sensu lato surveyed and in over-all sample size and
that for specific populations in these studies. Thereby the
study of Hershkovitz (1985) is based on more specimens
from a wider geographic range than any other published
study so far.
Rylands & Mittermeier (2009: 41 ) stated that ‘Silva-Jr.
and Figueiredo (2002) argue that the form west of the Rio
Branco is correctly C. chiropotes , according to its type lo-
cality, and the form to the east of the Rio Branco, extend-
ing through the states of Para and Amapa, and into the
Guianas (Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana) is C. sagu-
latus (Traill, 1821 ) from Demerara.’. However, they pro-
vided more detailed information on the issue than the pub-
lished abstract by Silva-Jr. & Figueiredo (2002) actually
contains. It may be assumed that it was obtained from
these latter authors personally. The same is true of the
statement in Veiga et al. (2008): ‘... Chiropotes sagula-
tus Traill, 1821, the latter representing the eastern form
of C. chiropotes , which occurs to the east of the rio Bran-
co, in Brazil. Suriname and the Guianas ’. Unfortunately
there are also no relevant data presented in the most re-
cent publications of Silva-Jr. et al. (2013) and Ferrari et
al. (2013) , which might support their taxonomic arrange-
ment. Yet, to the best of our knowledge no ‘proper’ per-
tinent study has been published so far presenting evidence
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 173-187
©ZFMK
Neotropical primates from the Cologne Zoo in the collections of the Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum A. Koenig 179
that C. chiropotes and C. sagalatus represent different
species, or that they possess different distributional ranges.
The name has recently been used, though, for bearded
sakis from Suriname (e.g. Gregory & Norconk 2011) and
the state of Para (north of the Amazon), Brazil (e.g.
Oliveira et al. 2009). The karyotypic differences between
three Chiropotes taxa (not including C. s. satanas and C.
albinasus) reported by Bonvicino et al. (2003), which in
their view strongly indicate their status as distinct
species, may actually support this concept. They found
that the Rio Branco is the parting line of the two karyotyp-
ically different Chiropotes forms north of the Amazon.
There is little data on fur colouration in juvenile indi-
viduals (Hershkovitz 1985); so it is not possible to eval-
uate whether, to which extent and how this characteristic
changes during ontogeny in the respective taxa. Anyhow,
an in-depth comprehensive revision based on as large a
number of specimens as possible from the entire distrib-
utional range, integrating classical morphological and
modem genetic methods, in combination with all other ev-
idence, is still required to clarify the taxonomy of the var-
ious forms of Chiropotes satanas sensu lato.
Chiropotes albinasus (I. Geoffroy & Devi lie, 1848) -
White-nosed saki
Material: Three of five females of Chiropotes albinasus
that lived at Cologne Zoo are in the ZFMK mammal col-
lection. ZFMK MAM 7 1.97b: adult female, f 1971, re-
ceived from Cologne Zoo 1971; skull, flat skin. This is
probably the individual the zoo received as a juvenile in
1968 (Windecker 1969). ZFMKMAM81 .1 815: adult fe-
male, f 17.VI.1981. received from Cologne Zoo VI-
11.1981; skull, postcranial skeleton, flat skin. This is the
individual ‘Bella”, the mother of four of the Chiropotes
hybrids bom at the zoo. This female arrived at the zoo in
1965 (Flick 1965a) and thus attained an age of >16 years.
Most of the photos published of Chiropotes albinasus from
Cologne Zoo (with its hybrid offspring) show this indi-
vidual. ZFMK_MAM 89.480: adult female, f
01. IX. 1988, received from Cologne Zoo IX. 1989; skull,
postcranial skeleton, flat skin. This is the female with the
Zoo house name ‘Bianca’ which arrived there 08.X.1970
(Windecker 1971 ) and is the individual with the maximal
longevity (> 18 years) attained by this species in any zoo
( Weigl 2005). During the time this female lived at the zoo
it gave birth to two offspring. Its estimated age of about
20 years noted by Weigl (2005) would imply that it was
roughly 2 years old when it arrived at the zoo.
The first documented individual of Chiropotes albina-
sus in the care of Cologne Zoo, an adult female, arrived
in 1965 (Hick 1965a; Pagel & SpieB 2011). In 1968 the
zoo received a juvenile female (Windecker 1969, anoth-
er female which arrived in 1966 only survived for a few
months) and in 1970 another two juvenile females
(Windecker 1971). Apart from popular print products of
the Cologne Zoo with photos (black-and-white and colour)
of several of these individuals (e.g. Hick 1968a: 35, 1973;
Windecker 1969; front pages of the journal ‘Freunde des
Kolner Zoo’ 9[3], 1966 and 1 1 [2], 1968), photos of them
also appeared in technical publications (Hick 1968b: Fig.
31; Roosmalen et al. 1981: 420; Hershkovitz 1985: 26).
Two of the white-nosed saki females gave birth success-
fully to hybrid young: a male out of a mating of Chiropotes
albinasus female x Chiropotes chiropotes male in 1968
(Hick 1968a) and five more hybrids (2 males, 3 females)
out of matings of Chiropotes albinasus female x Chi-
ropotes satanas male in 1973 (2), 1975, 1976, and 1979;
in 1978 one female had a miscarriage after such a mat-
ing. Like the first hybrid bom in 1968 (Hick 1968a), some
of the others born later were figured in photos, usually to-
gether with their mother (Kullmann 1976). The first hy-
brid bom in 1968 is mentioned and also figured in tech-
nical publications (Roosmalen et al. 1981: 420; Her-
shkovitz 1985: 26). Hershkovitz’s statement is not correct;
the sire of this hybrid offspring was a Chiropotes chi-
ropotes male (Becker, pers. comm. 2014). Four of the hy-
brid offspring were bom by the female ‘Bella’, two by the
female ‘Bianca’, and the same Chiropotes satanas male
was the sire of 4 of the 5 hybrids bom since 1973. A fe-
male hybrid bom in 1975 lived at Cologne Zoo for more
than 26 years (Weigl 2005). Occasionally one of these ju-
venile hybrids was wrongly labelled as Chiropotes albi-
nasus, resp. no mention was made that the juvenile is a
hybrid, e.g. in the publications of Kullmann (1976) and
Mittermeier & Coimbra-Filho (1981: Fig. 53, p. 86) or in
a figure legend (Zeitschrift des Kolner Zoo 1 7 ( 1 ), p. 1 ).
The same is probably tme for a colour photo of an adult
‘female white-nosed saki (Chiropotes albinasus)' in
Pauly (20 1 0: 1 82, Abb. 1 ). If the date when the photo was
taken (24.V.1990 as stated in the figure legend) is correct,
this individual is a hybrid of Chiropotes albinasus female
x Chiropotes satanas male because according to the zoo
archives the last female white-nosed saki at Cologne Zoo
died in 1988. In 1990 only two female hybrids were liv-
ing at the zoo (SpieB, pers. comm. 2011; Becker, per.
comm. 2012). Unfortunately, none of the altogether six hy-
brids bom at the zoo was given to the ZFMK, another zo-
ological museum or a scientific institute after their death.
Chiropotes chiropotes (Humboldt, 1811) —
Red-backed bearded saki
Material: ZFMK MAM 66.001 ; adult male,
f 04.01.1966, received from Cologne Zoo 1966; skull,
taxidermy mount (Fig. 2).
This individual arrived at the zoo as a juvenile in 1961
and was originally registered as a female which was lat-
er corrected. It is mentioned in Anonymous (1962) and
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 173-187
©ZFMK
180
Gustav Peters et al.
shown at different ages in two black-and-white photo-
graphs, the earlier taken in May 1962, the later in Sep-
tember 1963 (Anonymous 1963: 87). Comparing both
photographs the pronounced growth of the typical thick
split tuft of hair on the head and that of the eponymous
beard during the time span of about one year becomes ob-
vious. Photos of Chiropotes chiropotes individuals kept
at Cologne Zoo and published from 1964 onwards by zoo
employees (Hick 1965a, 1966) very likely show other in-
dividuals of this species living there, as two more indi-
viduals arrived at the zoo in 1964 and 1965.
Description of the specimen (Fig. 2): As the specimen
was on exhibit in the museum for a few decades, a gen-
eral fading of its pelage colouration is likely to have oc-
curred, especially in respect of possible yellowish/reddish
hues that may have been present in the living animal. Fol-
lowing statements are made under this qualification. There
is a marked contrast between the homogeneous light buffy
ochre of the back and the dark brown to black coloura-
tion of the fur of the head, extremities and the tail. The
colouration of the back extends into the flanks and the
arms and thighs. On the upper arms pelage colour grad-
ually changes into blackish brown of the more distal por-
tion of the anns, on the upper side interspersed with lighter
hairs. This colour change is more abrupt on the proximal
part of the thighs. The backs of hands and feet are cov-
ered by brown hair. The venter is black. The fur colour
on the head (with the beard and the split tuft of hair on
top of it), nape and tail is basically black. The change in
fur colour from the trunk to these body regions is abrupt.
Taking into account the unsettled taxonomic issues ad-
dressed earlier, the actual species identity of all relevant
specimens that lived at Cologne Zoo cannot be verified
resp. refuted retroactively, even more for those for which
no photos are available and/or no material was given to
the ZFMK or to another scientific institution after the an-
imals’ death. In addition, it is difficult to determine the
species identity of juvenile bearded saki individuals ret-
rospectively on the basis of photographic portraits with
adequate certainty. Therefore we use the scientific names
here under which they are registered in the zoo archives.
According to these (SpieB, pers. comm. 2011; Becker,
pers. comm. 2011) Cologne Zoo received four specimens
of Chiropotes chiropotes between 1961 and 1977, three
males and one individual of unknown sex which died a
few months after its arrival whereas the other individuals
all lived at the zoo for several years. One of these males
(house name ‘Ringo’), which arrived at the zoo as a ju-
venile in 1964, was the father of the first hybrid saki
(mother Chiropotes albinasus ) bom at Cologne Zoo in
1968 (Hick 1968a). This male, given to a private animal
husbandry in 1 982, was figured in Hick ( 1 968a: 38 & 39),
van Roosmalen et al. (1981: 421; fig. 2); photos in Napi-
er and Napier (1967: 121, plate 33) and Hershkovitz
(1985: 14, fig. 8) probably also show it. Unfortunately, no
remains of this individual are conserved in a scientific in-
stitution.
Chiropotes sp. - Bearded saki
Material: ZFMK_MAM_2008.244; adult male, f 1991,
received from Cologne Zoo 5. IX. 1991; skull, postcranial
skeleton, flat skin (Fig. 3). Animal received by Cologne
Zoo as a present from the defunct Dierenpark (zoo) Wasse-
naar, Netherlands, in 1978 and originally listed as Chi-
ropotes satcmas chiropotes in the zoo archives (Kullmann
1979). A colour photo of this individual alive, taken
24. V. 1990 and referred to as Chiropotes chiropotes , was
published by Pauly (20 1 0: 1 83, Abb. 2). However, the dor-
i
0 02
H
SSU53582 Saimiri sdureus
AF289515 Alouatta belzebul
FJ785423 Callicebus donacophilus
■ AF289988 Callicebus personalus
AY226183 Pithecia irrorata
AY226184 Cacajao melanocephalus
Fig. 4. Cytochrome b phylogeny of the genus Chiropotes. A, Posterior probabilities of the Bayesian approach and bootstrap sup-
port values of the maximum-likelihood analysis before and after the slash, respectively. B, Phylogenetic relationships and boot-
strap support values based on the neighbor-joining approach. Sample IDs correspond to GenBank accession numbers.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 173-187
©ZFMK
Neotropical primates from the Cologne Zoo in the collections of the Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum A. Koenig 181
sum of this specimen is light buffy to ochre contrasting
the dark brown to blackish colour of the outer side of the
upper and lower arms, legs, the fur of the head, and the
outer side of the thighs. According to Hershkovitz
( 1985:13) characters of chiropotes and utahickae are de-
scribed as ‘Dorsum dominantly orange or pale brown to
dark brown; outer side of upper arms and proximal part
of outer side of thighs orange to dark brown, not black-
ish’ and as ‘Head, nape, lower arms, and legs blackish,
sharply contrasted with orange of dorsum' in chiropotes
vs. ‘Head, nape, lower arms, and legs pale brown to dark
brown and not sharply contrasted with brown of dorsum’
in utahickae. Based on these external characters and the
fact that no geographical origin is known, the species des-
ignation of the ZFMK specimen remains questionable. The
results of our genetic study of this specimen is shown in
Fig. 4. Except of relationships among Cacajao , Pithecia
and Chiropotes , which cannot be correctly resolved based
on the short cyt b fragment using the ML and Bayesian
approaches, we obtained the same pitheciine phylogeny
as Bonvicino et al. (2003). Chiropotes albinasus forms a
basal taxon to all remaining Chiropotes members and C.
utahickae forms a sister clade to C. israelita. However,
irrespective of the phylogenetic approach and of uncer-
tainties among basal pitheciine relationships, our sample
from the ZFMK clusters together with the C.
chiropotes! sagulatus sample from east of the Rio Branco
causing paraphyletic relationships between C. israelita
(sensu Bonvicino et al. 2003; also Dare et al. 2011) and
C. chiropotes! sagulatus west and east of the Rio Branco,
respectively (Fig. 4).
Chiropotes satanas (Hoffmannsegg, 1807) -
Black bearded saki
Material: ZFMK_MAM_60. 1 08; juvenile male, f
1 1. IV. 1960, received from Cologne Zoo 20.VII.1960; taxi-
dermy mount. The animal died at the zoo shortly after its
arrival. A photo each of a juvenile individual of Chiropotes
satanas from Cologne Zoo published in Hill ( 1960) and
in Anonymous (1963) may be this animal but it may al-
so show one of the other two juveniles of this species
which the zoo received in 1954 resp. 1959, each of each
survived for a short time only.
Description of the specimen: With the exception of the
back which is covered with relatively long chestnut brown
hair, the hair-coat of all other body parts is black.
ZFMK_MAM_81.1819; adult male, | 04.VII.1981, re-
ceived from Cologne Zoo VIII. 1 98 1 ; skull, skeleton, taxi-
dermy mount. When this individual (house name ‘Nicky’)
arrived at the zoo as a young juvenile on 26.VI.1970 it
was originally registered as a female but this was correct-
ed in the archives in 1971. Its black-and-white portrait tak-
en soon after arrival was published (Windecker 1971 : 4).
No other photo published later of a bearded saki from
Cologne Zoo or one kept in the zoo archives can be re-
lated to this individual with certainty; therefore its char-
acters as an adult are not documented. It is the father of
all hybrids of Chiropotes satanas and Chiropotes albina-
sus females bom at Cologne Zoo between 1973 and 1978
(see above).
Description of specimen ZFMK MAM 8I.1819 (Fig.
5): As the specimen was on exhibit in the Museum for
nearly two decades, the same general qualifications as for
the Chiropotes chiropotes specimen ZFMK_MAM_
66.001 apply in respect of an assessment of the coat colour
of this individual. Moreover, it lost hair in the tanning
process, especially on the back. This is likely to result in
a changed perception of the colour of the back coat as
compared to that of a living animal. Generally, there is no
sharp contrast in coat colouration between different parts
of the body. The colour of the head (with beard and split
tuft of hair on top of it), nape, tail, extremities and backs
of hands and feet is black as is that of the venter. On the
back, shoulders, upper arms and thighs a lighter dull brown
shines through the blackish hue, dominating the general
colour impression of the back.
Whereas the last in-depth revision of the genus Chi-
ropotes by Hershkovitz (1985) listed two subspecies of
Chiropotes satanas in addition to the nominate form, the
current notion is that Chiropotes satanas represents a dis-
tinct species with no subspecies (Silva-Jr. & Figueiredo
2002; Bonvicino et al. 2003; Groves 2005; Figueiredo et
al. 2006; Rylands & Mittermeier 2009; Ferrari et al. 2013;
Fig. 5. Back view of mounted adult male Chiropotes satanas
specimen ZFMK MAM 81.1819. The hair on the back is thin-
ner than in the living animal (Photo: M. Weigt).
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 173-187
©ZFMK
182
Gustav Peters et al.
Silva-Jr. et al. 2013). As detailed above, the two remain-
ing former subspecies and an additional one are accord-
ed species rank each as well. We adopt this concept here.
As in the case of Chiropotes chiropotes we have to rely
on the species determinations in the Cologne Zoo
archives for those individuals for which no detailed doc-
umentation and/or collection material is available, appre-
ciating the fact that these may have been wrong, especial-
ly in young juveniles which are difficult to identify as to
species in Chiropotes satanas sensu lato. Between 1954
and 1970 Cologne Zoo received 4 individuals of Chi-
ropotes satanas , all as young juveniles: two males, one
female and one individual the sex of which was not es-
tablished with certainty and which died soon after its ar-
rival. Only the male individual received by the zoo in 1970
lived to adulthood.
Concluding taxonoinical remarks on
Chiropotes specimens in the ZFMk collection
Chiropotes chiropotes ZFMk MAM 66.0111: We con-
sider this species identification to be well-founded. In con-
sideration of the qualifications of such an appraisal the
available evidence still documents an extensive similari-
ty of this ZFMK specimen with the type specimen of
Brachyurus israelita Spix, 1823 and the specimen referred
to as Chiropotes cf. satanas in a colour photograph in Bou-
bli (2002), both of which are synonyms of Chiropotes chi-
ropotes.
Chiropotes sp. ZFMKMAM 2008.244: Our cyt b phy-
logeny shows a close genetic relationship of this speci-
men to an individual from Rio Trombetas east of the Rio
Branco, i.e. within the distribution of C. sagulatus accord-
ing to Ferrari et al. (2013) and Silva-Jr. et al. (2013). How-
ever, their description of sagulatus is ‘Dorsum and upper
limbs ... are orange to reddish-brown. Head, nape, low-
er arms and legs are blackish’ (Ferrari et al. 2013: 481),
which does not fit to the general appearance of the ZFMK
specimen. Despite the small amount of samples analysed,
the unknown origin of the ZFMK specimen and of the low
support values in reconstructed phylogenies, our data al-
low us to draw some preliminary conclusions. Our results
support the existence of different colour variants within
groups of closely related individuals and possibly within
the same geographic region, here within the Chiropotes
form occurring east of Rio Branco. This finding corre-
sponds to the statement by Hershkovitz (1985) that no
clear geographic separation between different pelage vari-
ants exists. Furthermore, our molecular results indicate
that most probably both israelita and sagulatus do not de-
serve species status and may represent synonyms of Chi-
ropotes chiropotes. Therefore, we highly recommend fur-
ther genetic studies on diverse Chiropotes samples from
a variety of geographical areas, including Chiropotes sa-
tanas to clarify the phylogeny of the genus, and most im-
portantly, to allow final taxonomic conclusions.
Chiropotes satanas ZFMk_MAM_60.108: There is very
little reliable information on coat colour of juvenile indi-
viduals of Chiropotes satanas sensu lato. To the best of
our knowledge no such data have been published for ju-
venile Chiropotes satanas sensu stricto; based on the rel-
evant details provided for Chiropotes chiropotes (Her-
shkovitz 1985: 17) it seems possible that this ZFMK in-
dividual actually represents the latter species.
Chiropotes satanas ZFMk_MAM_81.1819: In spite of
the reservations with respect to the assessment of the fur
colouration of the living animal, in light of the condition
of this taxidermy mount we consider this species identi-
fication to be well-founded.
Pithecia Desmarest, 1804
The first revision of the genus Pithecia by Hershkovitz
(1979) recognized four species, a concept also followed
by Buchanan et al. ( 1981 ). The current taxonomy of this
genus as adopted by Groves (2001, 2005), Rylands & Mit-
tenneier (2009) and Ferrari et al. (2013) is based on the
earlier and more detailed revision by Hershkovitz ( 1987b)
in which he recognized five species. However, there is al-
so evidence that a further revision of this genus is required
(Marsh 2004, 2006, pers. comm. 2012). In her final revi-
sion (Marsh 2014) 16 species are recognized.
Pithecia mittermeieri Marsh, 2014 -
Mittermeier’s Tapajos saki
Hershkovitz ( 1987b: 427, Fig. 25) figured an adult male
Pithecia irrorata irrorata (house name Sascha) from
Cologne Zoo. Since its arrival at Cologne Zoo in 1 966 un-
til its death on 20.1.1981 it was registered as Pithecia
monachus in the Zoo archives. Hick ( 1 968b) published its
black-and-white portrait and later on another
photograph/portrait in colour (Hick 1973) under this name.
The best photographic documentations of this individual
referred to as Pithecia monachus are two black-and-white
photographs and a colour photo in Tylinek and Berger
(1984) and colour photos in several official guides of
Cologne Zoo in the 1970es (Fig. 6). According to Weigl
(2005), who listed this animal under the scientific name
Pithecia irrorata irrorata , it reached the highest longevi-
ty known of any individual of this species in human care
(more than 14 years and 7 months). In the recent revision
of the genus this individual is identified as Pithecia mit-
termeieri sp. nov. (Marsh 2014: 5, Table 2). Regrettably
no zoological material of it is preserved in the ZFMK, an-
other zoological museum or a scientific institution.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 173-187
©ZFMK
Neotropical primates from the Cologne Zoo in the collections of the Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum A. Koenig 183
Fig. 6-7. 6. (Left) Adult male Pithecia mittermeieri Marsh, 2014 in the Zoo Cologne; this animal may be the one shown in fig-
ure 7 (Photo: P. De Prins, reproduced from 'Wegweiser durch den Zoo Koln’, c. 1976). 7. (Right) Adult male specimen of Pithe-
cia aequatorialis (lying individual on the left) (ZFMK_MAM_81.1818) in the Zoo Cologne ( 1973 or later); the individual sitting
on the right may represent Pithecia mittermeieri , possibly the same animal as shown in figure 6 (Photo: G. Peters).
Pithecia aequatorialis Hershkovitz, 1987 -
Equatorial saki
Material: ZFMK_MAM_8 1.1 818; adult male, f 1981 (?),
received from Cologne Zoo VI 11.1981; skull, postcranial
skeleton, flat skin (Fig. 7, the living animal).
This specimen has the diagnostic pelage characteristics of
Pithecia aequatorialis. It was received from Cologne Zoo
as Pithecia monachus and classified as such in the ZFMK
collection then. After the publication of the second revi-
sion of the genus Pithecia by Flershkovitz (1987b) the
species determination of this specimen was reassessed and
subsequently classified as Pithecia aequatorialis. This
identification was confirmed by L. Marsh (pers. comm.
2011) on the basis of several colour photos of the ZFMK
skin. Unfortunately, there is no photograph of the living
animal or written record in the Cologne Zoo archives
which can be unambiguously assigned to this individual
(SpieB & Becker, pers. comm. 2011). However, a photo-
graph by R. Mittermeier (in Marsh 2014: fig. 49) may
show this individual.
Several individuals classified as Pithecia monachus
lived at Cologne Zoo during the second half of the 1970’s.
Apart from the male individual of Pithecia mittermeieri
mentioned above (and then wrongly classified as P.
monachus at the zoo) none of the black-and-white pho-
tographs of ‘ Pithecia monachus' individuals archived at
the zoo shows an animal with the typical pelage charac-
teristics of Pithecia aequatorialis males. In the five year
period from 1977 until 1981 four individuals classified as
P. monachus died at Cologne Zoo, one of which was the
misidentified P. mittermeieri (Becker, pers. comm. 2012).
The only photograph on file of a "Pithecia monachus' in-
dividual at the zoo which died between 1977 and 1981
(other than the P.mittermeieri male mentioned) is one tak-
en in 1969 of a "monachus' that died in 1979. So, there
is definitely no ‘trace’ of the ZFMK Pithecia aequatori-
alis adult male in the Cologne Zoo archives. A colour slide
(Fig. 7) taken by one of us (G.R) shows this individual
alive (or another male of this species if there were more
than one in the zoo at that time) and therefore is addition-
al proof of its species identification (confirmed by L.
Marsh, pers. comm. 2013, based on this slide). The pho-
to can be roughly dated to the time period 1973 to 1977
because it was taken in the Lemur House of Cologne Zoo
which opened in 1973, and on written entries in the ani-
mal records at the zoo.
This species was described as new to science after all
Pithecia individuals (other than P. pithecia ) at Cologne
Zoo had been dead already for several years. In his ear-
lier revision of the genus Hershkovitz (1979: 15, fig. 5)
had figured a study skin of an adult male Pithecia as P.
monachus , only to revise his taxonomic assessment of the
same individual in the later revision and identify it as the
new species Pithecia aequatorialis (Hershkovitz 1987b:
408, fig. 16). Diagnostic characteristics differentiating
males of aequatorialis from male monachus are a ruff of
orange hair and a horseshoe-like area of relatively short
white dense hair around the sparsely haired facial disk in
the former species (L. Marsh, pers. comm. 2011, Marsh
2014).
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 173-187
©ZFMK
184
Gustav Peters et al.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Our paper is based on only a few Neotropical primate
specimens from Cologne Zoo in the ZFMK mammal col-
lection. Nevertheless, it provides an example of the val-
ue and of the conclusions that can be drawn from collec-
tions obtained from zoos and housed at zoological muse-
ums (or similar scientific institutions). The ZFMK re-
ceived also primate specimens from other zoos, such as
Duisburg and Frankfurt (see Appendix), which may be
equally important. In the first place it shows that even to-
day zoos may have scientifically important specimens in
their care, sometimes unnoticed by the scientific commu-
nity. To avoid such cases as far as possible it is desirable
that zoos and zoological museums intensify their cooper-
ation (cf. Gippoliti & Kitchener 2007). It is important that
zoos are aware of the potential scientific importance of
specimens in their care and try to gather and archive all
pertinent information during the lifetime of such speci-
mens: geographical origin (if known or if it can be traced
back), colour photos at different ages, body mass, meas-
urements, reproductive history, ISIS reports, CITES pa-
pers (if applicable), references of publications dealing with
the specimen (if the specimen is mentioned/figured in a
publication), or other. This is, however, more than usual-
ly recorded. It may be useful to agree on a uniform data-
base, so that information from different zoos can be more
easily combined.
Taking into account relevant veterinary and other legal
regulations the most reasonable procedure would be that
zoos pass such specimens immediately after their demise
to a zoological museum. The condition of the specimen
should thereby allow all standard museum procedures,
e.g., collection of tissue and hair samples, preparation of
skin and skeleton or any other method of conservation. Ap-
propriate storage of such samples should allow subsequent
genetic analyses. Furthermore, copies of all documenta-
tion of that specimen compiled at the zoo during the an-
imal’s lifetime should be provided, including veterinary
treatments. A scientifically important specimen in/from a
zoo can only maintain its ‘voucher status’ and its signif-
icance posthumously as a subject for later studies, if its
remains are housed and curated properly in a zoological
museum or another appropriate scientific institution in the
long run. This ought to be in the genuine interest of the
respective zoo and definitely is so for the scientific com-
munity, especially if specimens have been referred to in
the scientific literature like several Chiropotes individu-
als from Cologne Zoo in the ZFMK mammal collection,
which are listed here. The Pithecia mittermeieri individ-
ual discussed above exemplifies the deplorable ultimate
loss of information and research options if this procedure
is not followed after an animal’s death. On the other hand,
the specimen of Pithecia aequatorialis in the ZFMK col-
lection detailed before illustrates that steady contact and
information exchange between zoos and zoological mu-
seums may have resulted in the timely awareness of the
significance of this individual, especially in the context
of a taxonomical revision of the genus Pithecia.
Zoological museums with their taxonomic expertise
ought to interact with (neighbouring) zoos regularly, in-
cluding the offer to provide advice on matters of taxono-
my if requested. Once a specimen that died in a zoo is giv-
en to a museum, the museum has the responsibility of its
proper long-term documentation and curation, preserving
as much and diverse material of the animal as possible to
enable diverse kinds of (future) studies. This includes the
repeated verification of a specimen’s species identity on
the basis of the most recent pertinent publications to en-
sure its scientific significance. If a specimen is affected
by a taxonomical change, either during its lifetime or
posthumously, this information ought to be circulated
among the institutions involved.
Both zoos and zoological museums can only benefit
from a closer cooperation as a means to increase taxonom-
ic expertise and awareness of taxonomical problems as
well as the proper long-term conservation of scientifical-
ly interesting and important zoological specimens.
Acknowledgements. We are grateful to the many colleagues
who generously helped in gathering all the diverse information
necessary to carry out this study. Our sincere thanks to Wilhelm
SpieB and Ralf Becker (both Cologne Zoo archives) and Uta
Ruempler (nee Hick) (formerly Cologne Zoo) for providing in-
formation on the zoo’s relevant primate individuals and photos,
Andrew Kitchener (National Museums Scotland, Edinburgh) and
Ms. E.M. Lajtos (Library, Naturalis, Leiden) for help with lit-
erature, Laura Marsh (Global Conservation Institute) for expert-
ise in Pithecia identification, Richard Kraft and Michael Hier-
meier (ZSM) for information on and photos of the type speci-
men of Brachyurus israelita. Laura Parker and Wendy Lehkyi
(both Colchester Zoo), Tremaine Gregory (National Zoo, Wash-
ington, D.C.), Marilyn Norconk (Kent State University, Ohio),
and Liza Veiga (deceased) kindly provided photos of living Chi-
ropotes individuals and information. We are indebted to
Melanie Weigt (ZFMK) for photography and to Jorg Adrian
(ZFMK) for technical assistance, to Achim Winkler (Duisburg
Zoo) for information on Pithecia individuals kept at that zoo,
and to Carlos Ruiz Miranda (Universidade Estadual Norte Flu-
minense) for help with contacts in Brazil. We also thank Michael
Hofreiter for giving us the opportunity to conduct the genetic
analysis of the Chiropotes sample in his ancient DNA laborato-
ry at York University. We are also grateful for helpful comments
and suggestions of the two reviewers.
REFERENCES
Anonymous (1962) Freunde des Kolner Zoo 5:112
Anonymous (1963) Rotruckensaki im Kolner Zoo. Freunde des
Kolner Zoo 6: 87-88
Barnett AA (2005) Cacajcio melanocephalus. Mammalian
Species 776: 1-6
Barnett AA & Brandon-Jones D (1997) The ecology, biogeog-
raphy and conservation of uacaris, Cacajao (Pitheciinae). Fo-
lia primatologica 68: 223-235
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 173-187
©ZFMK
Neotropical primates from the Cologne Zoo in the collections of the Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum A. Koenig 185
Bonvicino CR, Lemos B & Seuanez HN (2001 ) Molecular phy-
logenetics of howler monkeys (Alouatta, Platyrrhini). Chro-
mosoma 110: 241-246
Bonvicino CR, Boubli .IP, Otazii IB, Almeida FC, Nascimento
FF, Coura JR & Seuanez HN (2003) Morphologic, karyotyp-
ic, and molecular evidence of a new form of Chiropotes (Pri-
mates, Pitheciinae). American Journal of Primatology 61:
123-133
Boubli JP (2002) Western extension of the geographic distribu-
tion of bearded sakis: a possible new taxon of Chiropotes sym-
patric with Cacajao in Pico da Neblina National Park, Brazil.
Neotropical Primates 10: 1-4
Boubli JP, da Silva-Jr MNF, Amado MV, Hrbek T, Pontual FB
& Farias IP (2008) A taxonomic reassessment of Cacajao
melanocephalus Humboldt (1811). with the description of two
new species. International Journal of Primatology 29: 723-741
Boubli JP & de Lima MG (2009) Modeling the geographical dis-
tribution and fundamental niches of Cacajao spp. and Chi-
ropotes israelita in Northwestern Amazonia via maximum en-
tropy algorithm. International Journal of Primatology 30:
217-228
Buchanan DB, Mittermeier RA & Roosmalen MGM van (1981)
The saki monkeys, genus Pithecia. Pp. 391-441 in: Coimbra-
Filho AF & Mittermeier RA (eds) Ecology and Behavior of
Neotropical Primates Vol. 1 . Academia Brasileira de Ciencias:
Rio de Janeiro
Cabrera A ( 1961 ) Catalogo de los Mamiferos de America del Sur.
Revisa del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘Bernar-
dino Rivadavia’, Ciencias Zoologicas 4(2): v-xxii + 309-732
Chiarelli AB ( 1972) Taxonomic Atlas of Living Primates. Aca-
demic Press: London
Dare M, Hait SH, Soares EA, Cicala C, Seuanez HN, Macha-
do ES, Arthos JA & Soares MA(201 1 ) Polymorphisms in the
alpha4 Integrin of Neotropical Primates: Insights for binding
of natural ligands and HIV-1 gpl20 to the Human alpha4be-
ta7. PLoS ONE 6 (9), E24461
Ferrari SF, Guedes PG, Figueiredo WMB & Barnett AA (2010)
Re-evaluation of the nomenclature of the blacked-faced
uacaris (Cacajao melanocephalus group, sensu Hershkovitz,
1987). 23ri^ Congress of the International Primatological So-
ciety, Kyoto, Japan: Abstract #350
Ferrari SF, Veiga LM, Pinto LP, Marsh LK, Mittermeier LK &
Rylands AB (2013) Family Pitheciidae (Titis, Sakis and
Uacaris). Pp. 432-483 in: Mittermeier RA, Rylands AB & Wil-
son DE (eds) Handbook of the Mammals of the World, Vol.
3. Primates. Lynx Edicions: Barcelona
Figueiredo WB, Silva-Jr, JM, Bates JM, Harada ML & Silva-
Jr, JS (2006) Conservation genetics and biogeography of
pitheciines. International Journal of Primatology 27 (Suppl 1):
Abstract #5 1 0
Figueiredo-Ready WB, Schneider H, Ferrari SF, Harada ML,
DaSilva JMC, Silva-Jr JS & Bates JM (2013) A molecular
phylogeography of the uacaris (Cacajao). Pp. 23-30 in: Veiga
LM, Barnett AA, Ferrari S & Norconk MA (eds) Evolution-
ary Biology and Conservation of Titis, Sakis and Uacaris.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Finstermeier K, Zinner D, Brameier M, Meyer M, Kreuz E et
al (2013) A mitogenomic phylogeny of living Primates. PLoS
ONE 8(7): e69504. doi:10.1371/joumal. pone. 0069504
Geoffrey I & Deville E (1848) Note sur huit especes nouvelles
de Singes americains, faisant partie des collections de MM.
de Castelnau et Emile Deville. Comptes Rendus Hebdoma-
daires des Seances de FAcademie des Sciences 27: 497-499
Gippoliti S & Bruner E (2007) The role of historical research
in the study of primatological collections: case-studies from
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 173-187
the Museo di Antropologica “G. Sergi”, Rome. Journal of An-
thropological Sciences 85: 157-162
Gippoliti S & Kitchener AC (2007) The Italian zoological gar-
dens and their role in mammal systematic studies. Conserva-
tion biology and museum collections. Hystrix - Italian Jour-
nal of Mammalogy (ns) 18: 173-184
Gregory T (2011) Socioecology of the Guianan bearded saki,
Chiropotes sagulatus. PhD thesis, Kent State University, Col-
lege of Arts and Sciences / School of Biomedical Sciences,
downloaded at http://etd.ohiolink.edu/view.cgi7acc_num
=kent 1300284081
Gregory T & Norconk M (2011) Behavioral responses to sea-
sonal changes in Guianan bearded sakis (Chiropotes saga lo-
tus): Brownsberg Nature Park, Suriname. American Journal
of Physical Anthropology 144 Suppl. 52: 149
Groves C (2001) Primate Taxonomy. Smithsonian Institution
Press; Washington, D.C.
Groves C (2005) Order Primates. Pp. 111-184 in: Wilson DE
& Reeder DM (eds) Mammal Species of the World - A Tax-
onomic and Geographic Reference. 31C* edition. The Johns
Hopkins University Press: Baltimore
Guindon S & Gascuel O (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate al-
gorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood.
Systematic Biology 52: 696-704
Haus T, Akom E, Agwanda B, Hofreiter M, Roos C, & Zinner
D (2013) Mitochondrial diversity and distribution of African
green monkeys (Chlorocebus Gray, 1870). American Journal
of Primatology 75: 350-360 doi: 10.1 002/ajp.22 113
Hershkovitz P (1979) The species of sakis, genus Pithecia, with
notes on sexual dichromatism. Folia primatologia 31: 1-22
Hershkovitz P (1985) A preliminary taxonomic review of the
South American bearded saki monkeys genus Chiropotes (Ce-
bidae, Platyrrhini), with the description of a new subspecies.
Fieldiana: Zoology (New Series) 27: 1-46
Hershkovitz P (1987a) Uacaris, New World monkeys of the
genus Cacajao (Cebidae, Platyrrhini): A preliminary taxonom-
ic review with the description of a new subspecies. American
Journal of Primatology 12: 1-53
Hershkovitz P (1987b) The taxonomy of South American sakis,
genus Pithecia (Cebidae, Platyrrhini): A preliminary report and
critical review with the description of a new species and a new
subspecies. American Journal of Primatology 12: 387-468
Hick U (1965a) Einige bemerkenswerte Neuanschaffungen im
zweiten Halbjahr 1965. Freunde des Kolner Zoo 8: 141-143
Hick U (1965b) Red-backed saki Chiropotes chiropotes at
Cologne Zoo. International Zoo Yearbook 5: 140
Hick U (1966) Aus der Kolner Saki-Sammlung. Freunde des
Kolner Zoo 9: 75-82
Hick U ( 1 968a) Erstmalig gelungene Zucht eines Bartsakis ( Va-
ter: Rotriickensaki, Chiropotes chiropotes (Humboldt, 1811),
Mutter: WeiBnasensaki, Chiropotes albinasus (Geoffrey et De-
ville, 1848) im Kolner Zoo. Freunde des Kolner Zoo 1 1 : 35 — 4 1
Hick, U. (1968b): The collection of saki monkeys at Cologne
Zoo. International Zoo Yearbook 8: 192-194
Hick U ( 1 973) Wir sind umgezogen. Zeitschrift des Kolner Zoo
16: 127-145
Hick U ( 1 974) Das erste Jahr im neuen Lemurenhaus. Zeitschrift
des Kolner Zoo 1 7: 123-135
Hill WCO (1960) Primates: Comparative Anatomy and Taxon-
omy IV Cebidae Part A. Edinburgh University Press: Edin-
burgh
Huelsenbeck .1, Ronquist F, Nielsen R & Bollback .1 (2001)
Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolution-
ary biology. Science 294: 2310-2314
©ZFMK
186
Gustav Peters et al.
Humboldt A von (1811) Sur les singes qui habitent les rives de
FOrenoque, du Cassiquiare et du Rio Negro, pp. 305-335 in:
Humboldt A von and Bonpland A (eds.) Receuil d’observa-
tions de zoologie et d’anatomie comparee, faites dans
l’Ocean Atlantique, dans Finterieur du nouveau continent et
dans la Merdu Sud pendant les annees 1799, 1800, 1801, 1802
et 1803. Premier Volume. Schoell & Dufour: Paris
Husson AM (1957) Notes on the primates of Suriname. Studies
on the Fauna of Suriname and other Guayanas 2: 13-40
Husson AM (1978) The Mammals of Suriname (Zoologische
Monographieen van het Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Histo-
rie no. 2. EJ Brill: Leiden
Hutterer R & Peters G (2010) Type specimens of mammals
(Mammalia) in the collections of the Zoologisches
Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Bonn. Bonn zoolog-
ical Bulletin 59: 3-27
Hutterer R, Verhaagh M, Diller J, & Podloucky R ( 1995) An in-
ventory of mammals observed at Panguana Biological Station,
Amazonian Peru. Ecotropica 1: 3-20
1CZN (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature,
fourth edition. London, The International Trust for Zoologi-
cal Nomenclature.
Jahn 1 (1994) Zoologische Garten - Zoologische Museen. Pa-
rallelen ihrer Entstehung. Bongo 24: 7-30
Kraft R (1983) Die von .1. B. v. Spix beschriebenen neotropi-
schen Primaten und Chiropteren. Verzeichnis der in der Zoo-
logischen Staatssammlung Miinchen aufbewahrten Typus-
exemplare. Spixiana Suppl 9: 429 — 44 1
Kullmann. E. ( 1976): Jahresbericht 1975 der Aktiengesellschaft
Zoologischer Garten Koln. - Zeitschrift des Kolner Zoo 19:
31-46
Kullmann E (1979) Jahresbericht 1978 der Aktiengesellschaft
Zoologischer Garten Koln. Zeitschrift des Kolner Zoo 22: 75-
91
Landsberg H (1994) Das erste Zootier des Museums - ein Man-
drill? Die Griindung des Zoologischen Gartens und dessen Be-
deutung fur die Sammlungen des Zoologischen Museums der
Berliner Universitiit. Bongo 24: 85-106
Marsh LK (2004) Primate species at the Tiputini Biodiversity
Station, Ecuador. Neotropical Primates 12: 75-78
Marsh LK (2006) Identification and conservation of a new
species of Pithecia in Amazonian Ecuador. International Jour-
nal of Primatology 27 (suppl 1): Abstract #508
Marsh L (2014) A taxonomic revision of the Saki monkeys,
Pithecia Desmarest, 1804. Neotropical Primates 21(1): 1-163
Mittermeier RA & Coimbra-Filho AF (1981) Systematics:
species and subspecies. Pp. 29-109 in: Coimbra-Filho AF &
Mittermeier RA (eds). Ecology and behavior of Neotropical
primates. Volume 1 . Academia Brasileira de Ciencias: Rio de
Janeiro
Napier JR & Napier PH (1967) A Handbook of Living Prima-
tes. Academic Press: London
Napier PH (1976) Catalogue of Primates in the British Muse-
um (Natural History). Part I: Families Callitrichidae and Ce-
bidae. British Museum (Natural History): London
Norconk MA (2007) Sakis, uacaris, and titi monkeys: Behav-
ioral diversity in a radiation of primate seed predators. Pp.
123-138 in: Campbell CJ, FuentesA, MacKinnon KC, Panger
M & Bearder SK (eds) Primates in perspective. Oxford Uni-
versity Press: New York
Oliveira LC, Loretto D, Viana LR, Silva-Jr JS & Fernandes W
(2009) Primate community of the tropical rain forests of Sara-
ca-Taquera National Forest, Para, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of
Biology 69: 1091-1099
Oppennann J (1994) Tod und Wiedergeburt - Uber das Schick-
sal einiger Berliner Zootiere. Bongo 24: 51-84
Pagel T & SpieB W (2011) Der Zoologische Garten in Coin er-
offnet am 22. Juli 1860 - 150 Jahre Wildtierhaltung und -
zucht. Der Zoologische Garten NF 80: 1 17-202
Pauly A (2010) Der Schwarzkopfuakari im Zoo Koln - die Neu-
bestimmung einer Art. Milu 13: 181-186
Posada D (2008) jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging.
Molecular Biology and Evolution 25: 1253-1256
Rambaut A (2008) FigTree: Tree figure drawing tool, version
1.2.2. Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edin-
burgh http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/ software/figtree/
Rohland N, Siedel H, & Hofreiter M (2004) Nondestructive
DNA extraction method for mitochondrial DNA analyses of
museum specimens. BioTechniques 36(5): 814-821
Rohland N, & Hofreiter M (2007) Ancient DNA extraction from
bones and teeth. Nature Protocols 2(7): 1756-1762
doi: 1 0. 1 038/nprot. 2007. 247
Rohland N, Siedel H, & Hofreiter M (2010) A rapid column-
based ancient DNA extraction method for increased sample
throughput. Molecular Ecology Resources 10: 677-683
doi: 10.1 1 1 1/j.l 755-0998. 2009. 02824.x
Ronquist F & Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phy-
logenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics
19(12): 1572-1574 doi : 1 0. 1 093/ bioinformatics/ btg 1 80
Roosmalen MGM van. Mittermeier RA & Milton K ( 198 1 ) The
bearded sakis, genus Chiropotes. In Coimbra-Filho AF & Mit-
termeier RA (eds) Ecology and behavior of Neotropical pri-
mates. Rio de Janeiro: Academia Brasileira de Ciencias:
419-441
Rowe N (1996) The Pictorial Guide to the Living Primates.
Pogonias Press: East Hampton, New York
Rylands AB & Mittermeier RA (2009) The diversity of the New
World primates (Platyrrhini): an annotated taxonomy. Pp.
23-54 in: Garber PA, Estrada A, Bicca-Marques JC, Heymann
E & Strier KB (eds) South American Primates: Comparative
Perspectives in the Study of Behavior, Ecology and Conser-
vation. Springer Science and Business Media Press: New York
Rylands AB, Mittermeier RA & Luna ER (1995) A species list
for the New World primates (Platyrrhini): Distribution by
country, endemism, and conservation status according to the
Mace-Land system. Neotropical Primates 3 (suppl): 113-160
Rylands AB, Schneider H, Langguth A, Mittermeier RA, Groves
CP & Rodriguez-Luna E (2000) An assessment of the diver-
sity of New World primates. Neotropical Primates 8: 61-93
Silva-Jr, JS & Figueiredo WMB (2002) Revisao sistematica dos
cuxius, genero Chiropotes Lesson, 1840 (Primates Pithecidae).
Livro de Resumos do X. Congresso da Sociedade Brasileira
de Primatologia, Amazonia, Belem, Para: 2 1
Silva-Jr, JS, Figueiredo-Ready WMB & Ferrari SF (2013) Tax-
onomy and geographic distribution of the Pitheciidae. Pp.
31-42 in: Veiga LM, Barnett AA, Ferrari S & Norconk MA
(eds) Evolutionary Biology and Conservation of Titis, Sakis
and Uacaris. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Spix JB Ritter von (1823) Simiarum et Vespertilionum Brasi-
liensium species novae on Histoire Naturelle des especies nou-
velles de singes et de chauves-souris observees et recueillies
pendant le voyage dans Finterieur du Bresil execute par or-
dre de S M Le Roi de Baviere dans les annees 1817, 1818,
1819, 1820. Typis Francisci Seraphi Hiibschmanni, Monachii:
I— VIII, 1-72, 28 Taf.
Swofford D (2003) PAUP'. Phylogenetic analysis using parsi-
mony ('and other methods). Sinauer Associates: Sunderland,
MA
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 173-187
©ZFMK
Neotropical primates from the Cologne Zoo in the collections of the Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum A. Koenig 187
Tamura K, Peterson D. Peterson N, Steelier G, Nei M, & Ku-
mar S (2011 ) MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analy-
sis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and
maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evo-
lution 28: 2731-2739
Traill TS ( 1821 ) Description of the Simia sagulata , - or jacket-
ed monkey. Memoirs of the Wernerian Society 3: 1 67— 1 69
Tylinek E & Berger G (1984) Das grofie Affenbuch. Landbuch
Verlag: Hannover
Veiga LM, Silva-Jr JS, Mittermeier RA & Boubli J-P (2008) Chi-
ropotes chiropotes. In: IUCN 2011. IUCN Red List of Threat-
ened Species. Version 201 1.2 <www.iucnredlist.org>. Down-
loaded on 10 January 2012
Weigl R (2005) Longevity of mammals in captivity: from the
living collections of the world. Kleine Senckenberg-Reihe 48:
1-214
Windecker W (1969) Jahresbericht des Zoologischen Gartens
Koln 1968. Freunde des Kolner Zoo 12: 3-12
Windecker W (1971) Jahresbericht des Zoologischen Gartens
Koln 1970. Freunde des Kolner Zoo 14: 3-12
Windecker W (1975) Jahresbericht des Zoologischen Gartens
Koln 1974. Zeitschrift des Kolner Zoo 18: 3-12
Zwickl D (2006) Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylo-
genetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under
the maximum likelihood criterion. The University of Texas:
Austin, TX
APPENDIX
List of Pitheciidae in the collections of ZFMK Bonn.
Cacajao calvus. ZFMK MAM 66.612 (Cologne Zoo 1966);
ZFMKM AM_8 1.1816 (Cologne Zoo 1981);
ZFMK MAM 200 1 147 (Cologne Zoo 1993);
ZFMKM AM_20 1 2.427 (Cologne Zoo 2008).
Cacajao hosomi. ZFMK MAM 2002.032
(Venezuela/Cologne Zoo 1992).
Chiropotes albinasus. ZFMK MAM 7 1.097 (Cologne Zoo
1971); ZFMK_MAM_8 1.1815 (Cologne Zoo 1981);
ZFMK MAM 89.480 (Cologne Zoo 1989).
Chiropotes chiropotes. ZFMK MAM 66.001 (Brazil/
Cologne Zoo 1961). ZFMK_MAM_74.155 (Duisburg Zoo
1974).
Chiropotes satanas. ZFMK MAM 60.108 (Cologne Zoo
1960); ZFMK_MAM_ 81.1819 (Cologne Zoo 1981).
Chiropotes sp. ZFMK MAM 2008. 244 (Cologne Zoo).
Pithecia aequatorialis. ZFMK MAM 8 1.1818, male
(Peru/ Cologne Zoo 1981).
Pithecia inusta. ZFMK_MAM_ 87.730, female
(Peru, Panguana 1973; Hutterer et al. 1995).
Pithecia pithecia. ZFMK MAM 71 .097, male (Cologne Zoo
1971); ZFMK_MAM_20 12.009, male
(Frankfurt Zoo 2008).
Pithecia sp. ZFMK MAM 75.108, female
(Duisburg Zoo 1975).
Bonn zoological Bulletin 63 (2): 173-187
©ZFMK
Bonn zoological Bulletin (BzB)
Instructions to authors
Scope
The Bonn zoological Bulletin (BzB), formerly “Bonner zoologi-
sche Beitrage”, is an international, peer-reviewed, open access jour-
nal publishing original research articles, reviews, and scientific notes
dealing with organismal zoology. Focus of the BzB are (1 ) taxon-
omy, (2) systematics and evolution, and (3) biodiversity and bio-
geography, all with respect to terrestrial animals. Terrestrial animals
as understood here include those inhabiting fresh or brackish wa-
ters. Contributions from related fields like ecology, morphology,
anatomy, physiology or behaviour are welcome when of clear rel-
evance to the focus topics.
Publication in BzB is free of charge, including colour illustrations
or photographs contributing significantly to quality and / or read-
ability of the manuscript. Authors retain full copyright of their pub-
lished papers, may share them with colleagues, and are encouraged
to post the original pdfs on their personal or institutional website
for non-commercial use. All material must be original, unpublished
work and not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
Research articles: Manuscript preparation and submission
Manuscripts should be written in English. For serving readers from
the organism’s country of origin, bilingual abstracts are welcome.
If you plan to submit a manuscript of more than 50 manuscript pages,
please contact the editor-in-chief in advance. Please submit your
manuscript as electronic file (see paragraph on electronic submis-
sion below). Manuscripts should strictly follow the instructions spec-
ified below. Manuscripts not compatible with these guidelines will
not be taken into consideration.
Format Typing should be double-spaced in 10 pt throughout the text,
including tables, figure legends, and reference list. Pages and lines
should be numbered consecutively. Short subheadings may struc-
ture the text into sections. Do not number headings or subheadings.
Structure Research articles should be organized as follows: Title,
Author(s), Address(es) including email address and telephone. Ab-
stract, Key words. Running Title, Introduction, Material and Meth-
ods, Results, Discussion (or combined Results and Discussion), Con-
clusions (optional). Acknowledgements, References, Tables, Figure
Captions, Figures (separately numbered and identified), Appendices
(if necessary). Footnotes should not be used except in Tables.
Title The title should be brief (30 words limit, ideally shorter) and
indicate clearly the field of study and group of animals investigat-
ed. The systematic position of taxa listed in the title must be indi-
cated (e.g. “Squamata: Colubridae”). A Running Title (maximum 45
characters inclusive of spaces) should describe the paper’s core top-
ic.
Abstract Each manuscript should contain a concise abstract as sin-
gle paragraph (max. 200 words) summarizing the significant find-
ings, followed by not more than six key words.
References In the text, cited sources should be referred to as fol-
lows: Ax (2001 ), Kim & Lumaret (1989), Holm et al. (1997) - for
three or more authors, or, if cited consecutively: (Ax 2001, 2002;
Holm et al. 1997; Kim & Lumaret 1989) - please follow exactly
the use of commas and semicolons. Do not use commas between
author and year (only exception: taxonomic names, in which a com-
ma is placed between author and year).
The list of references should be arranged alphabetically according
to the surname of the first author; all authors should be included.
Citations of two or more authors should be arranged alphabetical-
ly according to the first- and then the following author’s surname.
When more than one reference is given for a single author or the
same combination of authors, these should be arranged chronolog-
ically. If citing more than one reference by the same author(s) pub-
lished in the same year, use a, b, etc. after the year in both, text and
reference list (e.g. 2006a, b). The names of journals in the
References should be given in full. References “in press” shall on-
ly be cited when they have been accepted for publication. Exam-
ples of reference style are:
Kottelat M, Whitten T, Kartikasari SN, Wirjoatmodjo S (1993)
Freshwater fishes of Western Indonesia and Sulawesi. Periplus
Editions, Hong Kong
Mayr E (2000) The biological species concept. Pp. 17-29 in: Wheel-
er QD & Meier R (eds.) Species Concepts and Phylogenetic The-
ory -A Debate. Columbia University Press, New York
Parenti RP (2008) A phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision
of ricefishes, Oryzias and relatives (Beloniformes, Adrianichthyi-
dae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 154: 494-610
Sullivan J (1994) Bufo boreas. In: Fire Effects Information System
(U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Moun-
tain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory). Online at
http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/amphibian/bubo/all.ht
ml last accessed on December 28, 2009
Sztencel-Jablonka A, Jones G, Bogdanowicz W (2009) Skull mor-
phology of two cryptic bat species: Pipistrellus pipistrellus and
P. pygmaeus - a 3D geometric morphometries approach with land-
mark reconstruction. Acta Chiropterologica 11:1 13-126
Authors are kindly requested to make sure that sources listed in the
References match those cited in the text. Names of persons who pro-
vided unpublished information should be cited by including the ini-
tial(s) and city as follows: “(JG Frommen, Bonn, pers. comm.
2009)”.
Tables and Figures Tables and Figures should not duplicate infor-
mation provided in the text. Tables should be numbered consecu-
tively in Arabian numbers in order of their mention in the text (Table
1, Tables 1-3; do not abbreviate “Table(s)”). A brief self-explana-
tory title should be typed directly above each table, not on a sepa-
rate page. Do not insert frames, vertical rules, dotted lines or foot-
notes. Figures (maps, graphs, charts, drawings, photographs etc.)
must be numbered consecutively using Arabian numbers in order
of their mention in the text (abbreviate “Fig. 1”, “Figs 1-3” etc. in
the text, but use the full term “Figure(s)” in the captions. If refer-
ring to illustrations in cited sources, use “fig. / figs”. Grouped fig-
ures should be lettered with a lower case block letter in the lower
left comer. Scale should be indicated on figures by a scale bar. A
fully descriptive caption of each figure should contain all relevant
information; captions are to be typed together on a separate page.
Colour figures will be published free of charge if contributing sig-
nificantly to quality and / or readability of the manuscript. The de-
cision to print in colour or black and white any figure submitted in
colour will generally be based on the referee’s and handling editor’s
recommendations, but remains with the editor-in-chief and publish-
er. If appropriate, authors may be asked to group single colour fig-
ures into plates. For review, tables and figures should be enclosed
to text (preferable one electronic file per manuscript), but may al-
ternatively also be submitted as separate files (jpg, pdf, tiff). At this
stage, illustrations of low resolution allowing the referees to follow
the contents are sufficient; high-resolution files (jpg, pdf, tiff of pho-
tographs, maps etc. at > 300 dpi; line artwork etc. at 600 dpi or in
eps format) will be requested after acceptance. Unless otherwise
agreed with the editor, single electronic submissions should not ex-
ceed 6 MB file size.
Appendix Appendices should be numbered consecutively in Roman
numbers, in order of their mention in the text (Appendix I, Appen-
dices I VI ).
Abbreviations Except of very common abbreviations such as mm,
kg etc.; all abbreviations should be explained in the Methods sec-
tion or figure legend if appropriate. Hyphenation or upper case let-
ters for entire words are not permitted. All measurements must be
metric units and given to the same decimal, i.e., 5. 3-6.0 mm (not:
5.3-6 mm).
9
Instructions to authors
Taxonomy Names of animals and the description of new genera or
species must follow the current version of the International Code
of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN, available at
http://www.iczn.org/iczn/index.jsp). Type specimens should be de-
posited in recognised institutions; deposition at ZFMK is highly ap-
preciated. Italics are required for species names which are written
in full the first time they appear in the text, e.g. Carassius auratus
(Linnaeus, 1 758), but abbreviated at subsequent mention, e.g. C. au-
ratus. List names in synonymies as follows: Attelabus asparagi
Scopoli, 1763 (Scopoli 1763: 36, fig. 1 13.), and list the source un-
der References. Dichotomous keys are desirable in taxonomic pa-
pers.
Statistics Statistics presented should include the name of the test,
number of observations or degree of freedom, and probability lev-
el (P > 0.05, P < 0.05, P > 0.001, P < 0.001). Values of test statis-
tics are not required.
Scientific Notes
Notes should comply with the instructions given above, but have to
be ( 1) confined to a single point or issue of progress, (2) must be
short (typically no more than 3 printed pages including illustrations
and references), and (3) do not include headings or subheadings. A
brief abstract of no more than three lines is required.
Review papers
Reviews should be concise, critical and creative, seeking to sum-
marize the state-of-the-art of complex topics, and stimulate debates
and new research initiatives. Review papers should comply with the
instructions for preparation of Research articles, with the exception
that the main body of text may be structured as appropriate.
Electronic submission
Manuscripts should be submitted as text files (*.doc or * .rtf; *.pdf
is welcome for the review process, but for production *.doc or *.rtf
will be required) via e-mail (bzb.zfmk@uni-bonn.de) to the editor-
in-chief. Alternatively, send a CD. If neither is possible for any rea-
son, please contact the editor-in-chief. The file name must start with
the submitting author’s last name.
Review process
Each manuscript will be peer-reviewed, generally by two or more
referees. Manuscripts should be submitted to the editor-in-chief, and
will be handled by the editor dealing with the respective taxon or
topic (see list of editors). Authors are encouraged to suggest poten-
tial referees for their manuscripts. Final acceptance for publication
is in the responsibility of the editor-in-chief. This decision is main-
ly based on the referees’ report and the handling editor’s recommen-
dation. Revised manuscripts received more than 6 months after the
reviewers’ comments had been sent will be treated as new submis-
sions. After acceptance, authors are encouraged to submit sugges-
tions for a cover image.
Ethical and legal aspects
Authors are obliged to state clearly that they followed the legal reg-
ulations and laws for the collection and ethical treatment of animals.
Publication and open access policy
Manuscripts will be published online at www.zoologicalbulletin.de
after acceptance as preprint version, which will be replaced by the
final pdf after publication of the printed issue of BzB. The corre-
sponding author must clearly state so if preprint online publication
is not desired. In that case, only title, authors and the infonnation
that this manuscript has been accepted for publication will be made
available at that stage. Immediately after publication, the correspon-
ding author will receive an e-mail containing the final pdf. Reprints
can only be purchased on the author’s cost. Reprint orders must be
submitted to the editor at latest with the approval of the final proofs.
All published content is freely available without charge to the user
or his/her institution. Authors are invited to place the final pdf on
their personal or institutional website.
Questions we ask our reviewers
Authors preparing manuscripts for BZB should keep in mind the fol-
lowing questions which referees for the journal are asked:
1 . Is the paper of interest to the readers of BZB?
2. How well does it meet the focus of BZB?
3. Is it acceptable for publication, or should it be reconsidered af-
ter revision?
3. Please grade originality, quality of data, quality of statistical analy-
ses, and quality of interpretation on a scale from 1 = low to 5 =
high.
4. Please grade clarity and quality of text, figures and tables from
1 = low to 5 = high.
5. Has the welfare of any experimental animals been adequately tak-
en into account?
6. Does the title aptly and correctly describe the paper?
7. Does the abstract summarize only the significant findings?
8. Is the length of the paper appropriate?
9. Are all (colour) figures and tables necessary and appropriate?
Contents
3 9088 01798 0780
Grebennikov, Vasily V.:
Morimotodes, a new genus for two minute wingless litter species from
southwest China and Taiwan with an illustrated overview of Molityna and Plithina genera
(Coleoptera: Curculiomdae: Molityni)
Nguyen, Truong Quang, Trung My Phung, Nicole Schneider, Andreas Botov,
Dao Thi Anh Tran & Thomas Ziegler:
New records of amphibians and reptiles from Southern Vietnam
Liu, Wan-Gang, Ming Bai, Xing-Ke Yang & Dirk Ahrens:
Towards an improved knowledge of Sericim of the Tibetan highland:
new species and records (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)
Peters, Gustav, Tanja Haus & Rainer Hutterer:
Neotropical primates from the Cologne Zoo in the collections of the
Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig:
noteworthy specimens, taxonomic notes and general considerations
123
148
157
173
Cover illustration:
White-faced saki Pithecia pithecia (Photo: Rolf Schlosser)
(this volume, pp. 173-187).
Bundesministerium
fur Bildung
und Forschung
Ministerium fur Innovation,
Wissenschaft und Forschung
des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen