Bonn Volume 69
Issue 1
zoological 2020
Bulletin
formerly: Bonner zoologische Beitrage
An open access journal of organismal zoology, published by
Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig — Leibniz-Institut far Biodiversitat der Tiere, Bonn
BHL
i
Blank Page Digitally Inserted
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 1-9
2020 - Luu V.Q. et al.
https://do1.org/10.20363/BZB-2020.69.1.001
ISSN 2190-7307
http://www.zoologicalbulletin.de
Research article
urn:lsid:zoobank.org: pub: BOD2E47A-27A B-423B-A912-3649502BO00B8
New records and an updated list of reptiles from Ba Vi National Park,
Vietnam
Vinh Quang Luu"", Tuong Sy Dinh’, Oanh Van Lo*, Truong Quang Nguyen‘ & Thomas Ziegler*
"2.3 Faculty of Forest Resources and Environmental Management, Vietnam National University of Forestry, Xuan Mai,
Chuong My, Hanoi, Vietnam
‘Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet,
Hanoi, Vietnam
‘Graduate University of Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Cau Giay,
Hanoi, Vietnam
°Cologne Zoo, Riehler Strasse 173, D-50735 Cologne, Germany
* Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Ziilpicher Strasse 47b, D-50674 Cologne, Germany
* Corresponding author: Email: qvinhfuv@yahoo.com.au
'urn:|sid:zoobank.org:author:052B40C7-8AFB-43A5-AF22-713DA7B5BBDD
> urn:Isid:zoobank.org:author:A0589B58-E392-4796-8601-317BOB555EAB
>urn:|sid:zoobank.org:author:D1531821-C4CC-451C-9E9B-3514042AD137
*urn:|sid:zoobank.org:author:822872A6-1C40-461F-AAOB-6A20EEQO6ADBA
°ur:|sid:zoobank.org:author:F7B14B87-EC39-43 14-82F8-1A6A250C3944
Abstract. We report eight new records of reptiles from Ba Vi National Park, Hanoi, Vietnam: Gekko palmatus, Boi-
ga guangxiensis, Gonyosoma prasinum, Lycodon futsingensis, L. ruhstrati abditus, Opisthotropis lateralis, Hebius cha-
paensis, and Pareas hamptoni. Our findings bring the total number of reptiles recorded from Ba Vi National Park to 50.
Key words. Reptiles, new records, distribution, Ba Vi National Park.
INTRODUCTION
Ba Vi National Park (NP) is located in Ba Vi District of
Hanoi and Luong Son and Ky Son districts of Hoa Binh
Province, with a total area of 12,023 ha. There are three
high peaks in the national park: the highest is Dinh Vua at
1,296 m above sea level (a.s.1.), followed by Tan Vien at
1,226 ma.s.l. and Ngoc Hoa at 1,120 ma.s.l. (Fig. 1). The
Ba Vi NP is characterized by evergreen forest and mixed
forest of coniferous and broadleaf at elevations above
600 ma.s.l. (Tran et al. 2001). In Ba Vi District, previous
studies documented a total of 42 species of reptiles and
most of them were recorded from Ba Vi National Park
(Nguyen et al. 2009). As a result of recent herpetological
field surveys we herein present eight new records of rep-
tiles from Ba Vi National Park.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Field surveys were conducted in the Ba Vi NP by Vinh
Q. Luu, Oanh V. Lo, Ngoan V. Ha, Huy Q. Tran, Tuong
S. Dinh, Linh K. Luong, Nghia V. Ha and Le D. Phan
Received: 31.05.2019
Accepted: 12.01.2019
(hereafter V. Q. Luu et al.) in July, October and Novem-
ber 2018. Survey sites were selected at elevations rang-
ing from 400 to 800 m a.s.I. Three survey transects were
set up at three sites in the mixed forest of coniferous and
broadleaf plants: the Transect 1 along Ngoc Hoa stream
at elevations of ca. 400 m a.s.1., the Transect 2 in the for-
mer French Camping area at elevations of 600 m a.s.l.,
and the Transect 3 in the forest near Ruins of Old French
Church at elevations of ca. 800 m a.s.l. Specimens were
collected by hand or using a snake hook. Specimens were
euthanized in a closed vessel with a piece of cotton wool
containing ethyl acetate (Simmons, 2002), fixed in 80%
ethanol for four to stx hours, then later transferred to 70%
ethanol for permanent storage. The specimens were sub-
sequently deposited in the collection of the Vietnam Na-
tional University of Forestry (VNUF), Hanoi, Vietnam.
Taxonomic identification mainly followed Smith (1943),
Ziegler et al. (2007, 2008, 2018), Nguyen et al. (2009),
Vogel et al. (2009), Luu et al. (2013), Hecht et al. (2013),
Do et al. (2016), Gawor et al. (2016), Nguyen et al.
(2016), Le et al. (2018), and Pham et al. (2018).
Corresponding editor: W. Bohme
Published: 20.02.2020
2 Vinh Quang Luu et al.
a ok
Fig. 1. Map of Ba Vi National Park (black circle) in Hanoi City, northern Vietnam.
Abbreviations
SVL = snout-vent length: from tip of snout to anterior
margin of cloaca
TaL = tail length: from posterior margin of cloaca to tip
of tail
HL = head length: from the tip of snout to back of man-
dible
HW = head width: the widest portion of the head. Bilat-
eral scale counts were given as left/right.
RESULTS
Family Gekkonidae Gray, 1825
Gekko palmatus Boulenger, 1907
Palm Gecko / Tac ke chan vit (Fig.2a)
Specimens examined (n=3). One adult male VNUF
R.2018.19 (field number: BV.18.19) collected on 29
July 2018 in the fire protection and prevention station
(21°04’529N/105°22’719”E, at an elevation of 400 m
a.s.l.) and two adult females VNUF R.2018.12 (field
number: BV.18.12) collected on 26 July 2018 in the
ancient church area (21°04’409N/105°21’902”E, at an
elevation of 800 m as.l.) and VNUF R.2018.09 (field
number: BV.18.09) collected on 10 July 2018 in Ngoc
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 1-9
Hoa cave (21°05’159” N/105°22’701”’E, at an elevation
of 400 m a.s.1.) by V. Q. Luu et al.
Morphological characters. The specimens from Ba Vi
NP agreed well with the description of Rosler et al. (2011):
SVL 71.3 mm (male) and 72.2—74.2 mm (females), TaL
12.9-78.6 mm (the female VNUF R.2018.12 with lost
tail); head longer than wide (HL 21.5-—37.8 mm, HW
13.4-14.6 mm in females; HL 19.9 mm, HW 14.7 mm
in the male); rostral wider than high (RW 2.5-—3.5 mm,
RH 0.9-1.4 mm in females; RW 2.2 mm, RH 1.2 mm in
the male); nostril in contact with rostral; interorbitals 31—
33; preorbitals 18-19; supralabials 11-13; infralabials
10-11; scale rows at midbody 121—125; turbercle rows
at midbody 7—10 in the female and 8 in the male; turber-
cles absent on dorsal surface of limbs; ventral scale rows
at midbody 41-50; scales in a line from mental to the
front of cloacal slit 166 in the male, 171—176 in females):
subdigital lamellae under first finger 11-12, under fourth
finger 12—15, under first toe 12—13, under fourth toe 13—
14; precloacal pores 26 in the male, absent in females;
postcloacal tubercle 1/1.
Coloration in life. Dorsal surface of head, body and
tail greyish with dark blotches on head and nape; 4-6
larger blotches on dorsum; flanks and limbs with small
light spots; dorsal surface of tail of the female VNUF
R.2018.12 with eight light bands and of the female
©ZFMK
New records and an updated list of reptiles from Ba Vi National Park, Vietnam eS)
VNUF R.2018.09 with 10 light bands, ventral side of tail
yellowish cream with black dots.
Ecological notes. The adult female VNUF R.2018.12
was found on the wall of the ancient church at 22:13.
Temperature was 23.9 °C and humidity was 71%. The
adult male was collected in a house at 24:00 while crawl-
ing on the wall. The female VNUF R.2018.09 was found
on the roadside cliff at 20:43 with the relative tempera-
ture being 26.5 °C and humidity about 55%.
Distribution. In Vietnam, this species was recorded from
Lao Cai Province in the North southwards to Quang Binh
Province (Nguyen et al. 2009, Hecht et al. 2013, Gawor
et al. 2016, Pham et al. 2018; Uetz et al. 2019). This is
the first record of Gekko palmatus for Ba Vi NP and for
Hanoi City.
Remarks. The specimens from Ba Vi differ from the de-
scription of Rosler et al. (2011) by having fewer scale
rows at midbody (121-125 versus 139-156).
Family Colubridae Oppel, 1811
Boiga guangxiensis (Wen, 1998)
Guangxi Cat Snake / Ran rao quang tay (Fig. 2b)
Specimen examined. One adult female, VNUF R.2018.7
(field number: BV.18.7) collected on 6 October 2018 in
the ancient church area (21°04’421”°N/105°21°865”’E, at
an elevation of 801 ma.s.l.) by V. Q. Luu et al.
Morphological characters. The specimen from Ba Vi
NP agreed well with the description of Ziegler et al.
(2007): SVL 1290 mm, TaL 435 mm; head longer than
wide (HL 31 mm, HW 21.1 mm), distinct from neck; pu-
pil round; internasal shorter than prefrontal; loreal 1/1;
preocular 1/1; postoculars 2/2; anterior temporals 2/2,
posterior temporals 2/3; supralabials 8/8, third to fifth in
contact with the eye, eighth largest: infralabials 13/12,
third to fifth in contact with the eye, eighth largest; first
to fourth (left side) and first to third (right side) bordering
chin shields; dorsal scale rows 23—21—15, smooth; ven-
trals 270; cloacal single; subcaudals 145, divided.
Coloration in life. Dorsum pale brown, with irregular
black cross-bars, venter greyish-white.
Ecological notes. The specimen was found at 20:09
while crawling on the forest ground near a tourist road.
Distribution. In Vietnam, this species has been recorded
from Lao Cai Province southwards to Dong Nai and Tay
Ninh provinces (Nguyen et al. 2009; Do et al. 2016; Phan
et al. 2018). This is the first record of Boiga guangxiensis
for Ba Vi NP and for Hanoi City. Elsewhere, this spe-
cies 1s known from southern China, Cambodia and Laos
(Nguyen et al. 2009; Neang et al. 2017; Uetz et al. 2019).
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 1-9
Gonyosoma prasinum (Blyth, 1854)
Green bush ratsnake / Ran soc xanh (Fig. 2c)
Specimen examined. One adult female, WNUF
R.2018.30 (field number: BV3.18.10) — collect-
ed on 15 November 2018 in the ancient church area
(21°04°363”N/105°21°886”E at an elevation of 805 m
a.s.1.) by V. Q. Luu et al.
Morphological characters. The specimen from Ba Vi
NP agreed with the description of Hecht et al. (2013),
SVL 820 mm, Tal 330 mm; head longer than wide (HL
30.9 mm, HW 16 mm), head distinct from neck; pu-
pil round; internasal suture 1.6 mm; prefrontal suture
4.3 mm; loreal 1/1, not touching the eye; preocular 1/1;
postoculars 2/2; anterior temporals 2/2, posterior tempo-
rals 2/2; supralabials 9/9, fourth to sixth in contact with
the eye, eighth largest; infralabials 10/10; first to fourth
(both sides) bordering chin shields; dorsal scale rows 21—
19-15, keeled; ventrals 197; cloacal divided; subcaudals
106, divided.
Coloration in life. Dorsal surface of head, back and tail
green. The upper lip, lower throat, venter and lower sur-
face of tail light green. Each side of the ventrolateral fold
has a pale whitish stripe that runs from the neck to cloaca.
Ecological notes. The specimen was found in the eve-
ning on the wall of the ancient church.
Distribution. In Vietnam, this species was reported
from Lao Cai Province in the North southwards to Gia
Lai Province (Nguyen et al. 2009; Hecht et al. 2013; Le
et al. 2018). This 1s the first record of Gonyosoma prasi-
num for Ba Vi NP and for Hanoi City. Elsewhere, the
species 1s known from India, Southern China, Myanmar,
Laos, Thailand, Malaysia (Nguyen et al. 2009; Uetz et al.
2019).
Remarks. The specimen from Ba Vi differs from those in
the descriptions of Smith (1943) and Hecht et al. (2013)
by having more dorsal scale rows at neck (21-19-15 ver-
sus 19-19-15).
Hebius chapaensis (Bourret, 1934)
Sapa Flat-nosed Snake / Ran binh mii sa pa (Fig. 2d)
Specimen examined. One adult female, VNUF R.2018.8
(field number: BV.18.8) collected on 15 November 2018
(21°04’821”N/105°22’190”’E, at an elevation of 402 m
a.s.l.), by V. Q. Luu et al.
Morphological characters. The specimen from Ba
Vi NP agreed with the description of Le et al. (2018):
SVL 440 mm, TaL 140 mm; head longer than wide (HL
13.6 mm, HW 8.82 mm), distinct from the neck; pupil
©ZFMK
4 Vinh Quang Luu et al.
Fig. 2. Dorsal and dorsolateral views of the eight new records of reptiles from Ba Vi National Park, Hanoi, Vietnam. a. Gekko
palmatus (VNUF R.2018.12). b. Boiga guangxiensis (VNUF R.2018.7). ¢. Gonvosoma prasinum (VNUF R.2018.30). d. Hebius
chapaensis (VNUF R.2018.8). e. Lycodon futsingensis (VNUF R.2018.5). f. Lycodon ruhstrati abditus (VNUF R.2018.10). g.
Opisthotropis lateralis (VNUF R.2018.37). h. Pareas hamptoni (VNUF R.2018.18).
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 1-9 ©ZFMK
New records and an updated list of reptiles from Ba Vi National Park, Vietnam 5
round; loreal 1/1, not touching the eye; preoculars 2/2;
postoculars 2/2: anterior temporals 1/1, posterior tempo-
rals 2/2; supralabials 9/9, fifth to sixth in contact with the
eye, seventh largest; infralabials 10/10, first to fifth (both
sides) bordering chin shields; dorsal scale rows 17—17—
17, feebly keeled; scales of the outer row enlarged; ven-
trals 170; cloacal divided; subcaudals 70, divided.
Coloration in life. Dorsal surface of head, body and tail
blackish grey, with two broader light yellow dorsolateral
stripes along the body; ventral surface and lower surface
of tail black.
Ecological notes. The specimen was found in the eve-
ning in a stream while being kept by a crab.
Distribution. In Vietnam, this species was reported from
Lao Cai, Son La, and Yen Bai provinces. This is the first
record of Hebius chapaensis for Ba Vi National Park and
for Hanoi City. Elsewhere, the species is known from
China (Uetz et al. 2019).
Remarks. Pararhabdophis chapaensis was original-
ly described from Sa Pa, Lao Cai Province by Bourret
(1934) and it was considered as a poorly known species,
known only from northwestern Vietnam and Yunnan
Province of China. This species was recently transferred
to the genus Hebius by Kizirian et al. (2018).
Lycodon futsingensis (Pope, 1928)
Futsing Wolf Snake / Ran khuyét fut-sing (Fig.2e)
Specimen examined. One adult male, VNUF R.2018.5
(field number: BV.18.5) collected on 6 October 2018 in
the ancient church area (21°04’383”°N/105°21°856”E, at
an elevation of 800 m a.s.I.) by V. Q. Luu et al.
Morphological characters. The specimen from Ba
Vi NP agreed well with the description of Vogel et al.
(2009): SVL 680 mm, Tal 160 mm; head distinct from
neck; pupil round; nasal divided; loreal 1/1, not touching
the eye; preocular 1/1; subocular absent; postoculars 2/2;
anterior temporals 2/2, posterior temporals 3/3; supral-
abials 8/8, third to fifth in contact with the eye, sixth larg-
est; infralabials 10/10, first to third (left side) and first to
fifth (right side) bordering chin shields; dorsal scale rows
17-17-15, smooth; ventrals 204; cloacal single; subcau-
dals 74, divided.
Coloration in life. Dorsum chocolate brown with 30
white brown bands on the body and 13 bands on the tail.
Ventral surface white with dirty brown marbling, dark
brown posteriorly.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 1-9
Ecological note. The specimen was found at 20:39 on
the forest ground. The relative temperature was about
22.6 °C and the humidity 60%.
Distribution. In Vietnam, this species was reported from
Lao Cai Province southwards to Da Nang City. This is the
first record of Lycodon futsingensis for Ba Vi NP and for
Hanoi City. Elsewhere, the species is known from China,
Laos, Japan, Taiwan, Myanmar (Hecht et al. 2013; Luu
et al. 2013; Nguyen et al. 2018; Uetz et al. 2019).
Lycodon ruhstrati abditus (Vogel, David, Pauwels, Su-
montha, Norval, Hendrix, Vu & Ziegler, 2009)
Mountain Wolf Snake / Ran khuyét dém (Fig.2f)
Specimen examined. One adult male, VNUF R.2018.10
(field number: BV.18.10) collected on 26 July 2018 in the
camping area (21°04’526’’N/105°22’189”E, at an eleva-
tion of 672 ma.s.l.) by V. Q. Luu et al.
Morphological characters. The specimen from Ba Vi
NP agreed with the description of Vogel et al. (2009),
SVL 696 mm, TaL 190 mm; TL 886 mm; body elongate;
head moderately distinct from neck, head longer than
wide (HL 19.4 mm, HW 12.2 mm) rather flattened; snout
projecting anteriorly beyond lower jaw; pupil vertically
oval; tail tapered and thin; loreal 1/1; loreal not in con-
tact with eye; supralabials 8/8, third to fifth in contact
with the eye, sixth largest; infralabials 9/8, first to fifth
(left side) and first to fourth (right side) bordering chin
shields; posterior chin shields a little shorter than anterior
ones; preocular 1/1; postoculars 2/2; anterior temporals
1/1, posterior temporals 3/2; dorsal scale rows 17-17-15,
keeled; ventrals 229; subcaudals 100, divided; cloacal
single.
Coloration in life. Dorsal surface of body greyish black
with 26 cross-bars, including two white bands near the
neck and 24 brown bands on body. Ventral surface white
with some small brown spots posteriorly. Dorsal surface
of tail greyish brown with 16 cream rings, extending to-
wards the lower surface of the tail.
Ecological notes. The specimen was found at 21:18 in
the shrub near a forest path. The surrounding habitat was
secondary forest mixed with bamboos. The relative tem-
perature was 25.1 °C and the humidity was 71%.
Distribution. In Vietnam, this species was previously
known from Vinh Phuc and Quang Binh provinces. This
is the first record of Lycodon ruhstrati abditus for Ba Vi
NP and for Hanoi City. Elsewhere, this species is known
from China and Laos (Vogel et al. 2009; Luu et al. 2013;
Uetz et al. 2019).
©ZFMK
6 Vinh Quang Luu et al.
Remarks. The specimen from Ba Vi NP differs from the
description of Vogel et al. (2009) by having more ven-
trals (229 versus 214—224) and the first body band start-
ing at ventral 24 (versus at ventrals 12—17).
Opisthotropis lateralis Boulenger, 1903
Tonkin Mountain Keelback / R&n tran bén (Fig. 2g)
Specimen examined. one adult male, VNUF R.2018.37
(field number: BV3.18.07) collected on 15 November
2018 (21°04’821”N/105°227190”E, at an elevation of
400 ma.s.l.) by V. Q. Luu et al.
Morphological characters. The specimen from Ba Vi
NP agreed with the description of Hecht et al. (2013):
SVL 470 mm, TaL 85 mm; head length larger than wide
(AL 17.5 mm, HW 10.3 mm), rostral broader than high;
internasals paired; prefrontal single; frontal longer than
wide, shorter than parietals, twice as broad as supraocu-
lar; nostrils directing upwards, in the upper part of single
nasal; internasal suture 1 mm: prefrontal suture 2.4 mm;
loreal 1/1, not touching the eye; preocular 1/1; postocu-
lars 2/2: anterior temporal 1/1, posterior temporals 2/2:
supralabials 9/9, fifth to sixth in contact with the eye,
eighth largest; infralabials 10/10, first to fourth (both
sides) bordering chin shields; dorsal scale rows 17—17—
17, keeled; ventrals 182; cloacal divided; subcaudals 50,
divided.
Coloration in life. Dorsal surface of head and body dark
greyish brown, ventral surface yellowish white.
Ecological notes. The specimen was found at night in a
stream after heavy rain.
Distribution. In Vietnam, this species was reported from
Cao Bang, Lang Son, Vinh Phuc, Quang Ninh, Bac Gi-
ang, Hai Duong, and Hoa Binh provinces (Nguyen et al.
2009; Hecht et al. 2013; Gawor et al. 2016). This is the
first record of Opisthotropis lateralis for Ba Vi National
Park and for Hanoi City. Elsewhere, the species is report-
ed from China (Nguyen et al. 2009; Uetz et al. 2019).
Family Pareatidae Romer, 1956
Pareas hamptoni (Boulenger, 1905)
Hampton’s Slug Snake / Ran h6 may ham-ton (Fig. 2h)
Specimens examined (n=2). One adult female VNUF
R.2018.18 (field number: BV.18.18) collected on 28 July
2018 in the orchid garden (21°04’529”N, 105°22’719”E,
at elevation of 719), and one adult male VNUF R.2018.04
(field number: BV.18.04) on 6 October 2018 in the an-
cient church area (21°04’397°°N/105°21°845”E, at an el-
evation of 400 maz.s.I.) by V. Q. Luu et al.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 1-9
Morphological characters. The specimen from Ba Vi
NP agreed with the description of Ziegler et al. (2007);
Pham et al. (2018); Nguyen et al. (2018); SVL 453-
480 mm, TaL 141-160 mm; body strongly compressed;
head distinct from neck; head longer than wide (HL
15.8-17.3 mm, HW 8.7—11.1 mm); nasal undivided; lo-
real 1/1, not touching the eye; preoculars 2/2; postoculars
2/2; suboculars 2/2, long and slender; anterior temporals
2/2, posterior temporals 3/2; supralabials 8/7; infralabials
8/8; mental groove absent; dorsal scales smooth in the
male and feebly keeled in the female; dorsal scale rows
15-15-15; ventrals 188-189; cloacal single; subcaudals
89-100, divided.
Coloration in life. Dorsal surface of head and body red-
dish brown, with vertical black body bands; ventral scales
from chin to lower surface of tail orange with black spots
in the female, dorsal surface of tail with black stripe.
Ecological notes. The female was found at 20:30 on the
road in the heavy rain and the male was found at 20:48
on the roadside.
Distribution. In Vietnam, this species has been record-
ed from Lao Cai Province in the North southwards to
Lam Dong and Dong Nai provinces (Nguyen et al. 2009;
Nguyen et al. 2018; Phan et al. 2018; Le et al. 2018). This
is the first record of P. hamptoni for Ba Vi NP and for
Hanoi City. Elsewhere, the species is known from Chi-
na, Myanmar, Laos, and Cambodia (Nguyen et al. 2009;
Uetz et al. 2019).
DISCUSSION
Our new findings of reptiles from Ba Vi National Park
bring the total species number of reptiles in this national
park to 50 (see Table 1, Apendix). In recent years, some
taxonomic changes have been made concerning reptiles
in Vietnam. Nguyen et al. (2009) reported Ophisau-
rus harti (Boulenger, 1899) from Ba Vi NP but it was
re-identified as Dopasia ludovici by Nguyen et al. (2011).
In this study, we provide the first record of Hebius cha-
paensis but did not find any H. khasiensis (Boulenger,
1890). Therefore, the previous record of H. khasiensis in
Ba Vi NP needs to be confirmed on the basis of voucher
specimens because H. chapaensis and H. khasiensis are
morphologically similar to each other.
In terms of conservation concern, among 50 recorded
species of reptiles, five species were listed in the IUCN
Red List (2019), eight species were listed in the Vietnam
Red Data Book (2007) and three species were listed in
the Governmental Decree No. 06 (2019).
©ZFMK
New records and an updated list of reptiles from Ba Vi National Park, Vietnam 7
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are grateful to the directorates of the Ba Vi National Park
for supporting our field work and issuing relevant permits. We
thank Ha V. Ngoan, Luong K. Linh, Ha V. Nghia, Huy Q. Tran,
Le D. Phan and K60 students of the Forest Resources Man-
agement for their assistance in the field. We thank E. Sterling
(New York) and K. Koy (Berkeley) for providing the map. This
research is partially supported by the Vietnam Academy of Sci-
ence and Technology (Project Code QTBY01.01/19-20) to T.Q.
Nguyen.
REFERENCES
Boulenger GA (1899) On a collection of reptiles and batra-
chians made by Mr. J. D. La Touche in N.W. Fokien, China.
Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London: 159-172
Bourret R (1934) Notes herpétologiques sur 1|’Indochine
Frang¢aise I. Ophidiens de Chapa. Bull. Gen. Instr. Pub. Hanoi
7 (March 1934): 129-138
Farkas B, Ziegler T, Pham CT, Ong AV & Fritz U (2019) A
new species of Pelodiscus from northeastern Indochina (Te-
studines: Trionychidae). ZooKeys 824: 71-86
Gawor A, Pham CT, Nguyen TQ, Nguyen TT, Schmitz A &
Ziegler T (2016) The herpetofauna of the Bai Tu Long Na-
tional Park, northeastern Vietnam. Salamandra 52 (1): 23-41
Hecht VL, Pham CT, Nguyen TT, Nguyen TQ, Bonkowski
M & Ziegler T (2013) First report on the herpetofauna of Tay
Yen Tu Nature Reserve, northeastern Vietnam. Biodiversity
Journal 4 (4): 507-552
Kizirian D, Nguyen TQ, Ngo HT & Le MD (2018) Parahe-
licops, Pararhabdophis, Paraphyly: Phylogenetic Relation-
ships among Certain Southeast Asian Natricine Snakes (He-
bius). American Museum Novitates 3906: 1-7
Le DT, Dao AN, Pham DT, Ziegler T, Nguyen TQ (2018) New
records and an updated list of snakes from Yen Bai Province,
Vietnam. Herpetology Notes 11: 101-108
Luu VQ, Nguyen TQ, Calame T, Hoang TT, Southichack S,
Bonkowski M, Ziegler T (2013) New country records of rep-
tiles from Laos. Biodiversity Data Journal 1: 1-14
Neang T, Chan S, Chhin S, Samorn V, Poyarkov NA, Stephens,
J, Daltry JC, Stuart BL (2017) First records of three snake
species from Cambodia. Cambodian Journal of Natural His-
tory: 142-146
Nguyen QH, Luu VQ, Le DT (2018) New records of amphibi-
ans and reptiles from Cuc Phuong National Park, Ninh Binh
Province. Science and Technology Journal of Agriculture &
Rural Development 6: 138-143 (in Vietnamese)
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 1-9
Nguyen TQ, Boehme W, Nguyen TT, Le QK, Pahl KR, Haus
T, Ziegler T (2011) Review of the genus Dopasia Gray, 1853
(Squamata: Anguidae) in the Indochina subregion. Zootaxa
2894: 58-68
Nguyen TQ, Nguyen TV, Pham CT, Ong AV, Ziegler T (2018).
New records of snakes (Squamata: Serpentes) from Hoa
Binh Province, northwestern Vietnam. Bonn zoological Bul-
letin 67 (1): 15-24
Nguyen SV, Ho CT, Nguyen TQ (2009) Herpetofauna of Viet-
nam. Edition Chimaira, Frankfurt am Main.
Pham AV, Pham CT, Hoang NV, Ziegler T, Nguyen TQ (2017)
New records of amphibians and reptiles from Ha Giang Prov-
ince, Vietnam. Herpetology Notes 10: 183-191
Pham AV, Tu HV, Nguyen TV, Ziegler T, Nguyen TQ (2018)
New records and an updated list of lizards from Son La Prov-
ince, Vietnam. Herpetology Notes 11: 209-216
Pham AV, Nguyen BTN, Nguyen MT, Nguyen SLH, Nguyen
TQ (2013) New records of snakes (Reptilia: Squamata: Ser-
pentes) from Son La Province. Proceedings of the 5"! Nation-
al Scientific Conference on Ecology and Biological Resourc-
es, Ha Noi, Vietnam: 1-8
Roésler H, Bauer AM, Heinicke MP, Greenbaum E, Jackman
T, Nguyen TQ, Ziegler T (2011) Phylogeny, taxonomy, and
zoogeography of the genus Gekko Laurenti, 1768 with the
revalidation of G. reevesii Gray, 1831 (Sauria: Gekkonidae).
Zootaxa 2989: 1-50
Simmons JE (2002) Herpetological collecting and collections
management. Revised edition. Society for the Study of Am-
phibians and Reptiles. Herpetological Circular 31: 1-153
Smith MA (1943) The Fauna of British India, Ceylon and Bur-
ma, Including the Whole of the Indo-Chinese Sub-Region.
Reptilia and Amphibia. 3 (Serpentes). Taylor and Francis,
London.
Tran OV, Do Q, Le BD, Jones B, Wunder J, Russell-Smith J
(2001) A survey of medicinal plants in Ba Vi National Park,
Vietnam: methodology and implications for conservation and
sustainable use. Biological Conservation 97: 295-304
Uetz P, Freed P & HoSek J (eds) (2019) The Reptile Database.
http://www. reptile-database.org [last access 02 May 2019]
Vogel G, David P, Pauwels OSG, Sumontha M, Norval G, Hen-
drix R, Vu NT, Ziegler T (2009) A revision of Lycodon ruh-
strati (Fischer 1886) auctorum (Squamata Colubridae), with
the description of a new species from Thailand and a new
subspecies from the Asian mainland. Tropical Zoology 22:
131-182
Ziegler T, Hendrix R, Vu TN, Vogt M, Forster B & Dang KN
(2007) The diversity of a snake community in a karst forest
ecosystem in the central Truong Son, Vietnam, with an iden-
tification key. Zootaxa 1493: 1—40
©ZFMK
APPENDIX
Table 1. Updated list of reptiles recorded from Ba Vi NP.
Data sources: 1: Nguyen et al. (2009); 2: This study; 3: Nguyen et al. (2011).
Vinh Quang Luu et al.
Decree 06 (2019) = Governmental Decree No 06/2019/ND-CP by the Government of Vietnam on the management of endangered
wild flora and fauna. Group IB: prohibited exploitation and use for commercial purpose and Group IIB: limited exploitation and
use for commercial purpose; RBVN (2007) = Vietnam Red Data Book. Part I. Animals. Descriptions of nationally endangered
species of wild animals. CR = Critically Endangered, EN = Endangered, VU = Vulnerable; IUCN (2019) = The IUCN Red List
of Threatened Species. CR = Critically Endangered, EN = Endangered, VU = Vulnerable, LR/nt = Lower Risk/Near Threatened,
* new provincial record; ** most probably Pelodiscus variegatus, see Farkas et al. (2019).
Species name Data source | IUCN (2019) | RBVN (2007) | Decree 06 (2019)
REPTILIA ——|
Squamata
Sauria
Agamidae
Acanthosaura lepidogaster (Cuvier, 1829) 12
Draco maculatus (Gray, 1845) 1
Pseudocalotes brevipes (Werner, 1904)
Physignathus cocincinus Cuvier, 1829 1 VU
Gekkonidae 1
Gekko palmatus Boulenger, 1907*
Gekko reevesii (Gray, 1831) l VU
Hemidactylus frenatus Dumérin & Bibron,1836 2
Scincidae
Eutropis longicaudatus (Hallowell, 1857)
Tropidophorus baviensis Bourret, 1939 1,2
Tropidophorus hainanus Smith, 1923 1
Anguidae =|
Dopasia ludovici (Mocquard, 1905) Nea es
Serpentes
Colubridae
Ahaetulla prasina (Boie, 1827)
Boiga guangxiensis Wen, 1998* 2
Boiga multomaculata (Bote, 1827)
Calamaria pavimentata Duméril, Bibron & Dumeéril, 1854 |
Calamaria septentrionalis Boulenger, 1890 VU
Coelognathus radiatus (Bote, 1827) VU
Gonyosoma boulengeri (Mocquard, 1897) 1
Gonyosoma prasinum (Blyth, 1854)* VU
Hebius chapaensis (Bourret, 1934)* 2
Hebius khasiensis (Boulenger, 1890)
Hebius sauteri (Boulenger, 1909) 1
Lycodon futsingensis (Pope, 1928)*
Lycodon meridionalis (Bourret, 1935) | Pe
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 1-9 ©ZFMK
New records and an updated list of reptiles from Ba Vi National Park, Vietnam
Table 1. Continued
Species name
Lycodon ruhstrati abditus Vogel, David, Pauwels, Sumon-
tha, Norval, Hendrix, Vu & Ziegler, 2009*
Lycodon subcinctus Boie, 1827
Data source
2
1
IUCN (2019)
RBVN (2007) | Decree 06 (2019)
Oligodon cinereus (Gunther, 1864)
Oligodon eberhardti Pellegrin, 1910
1
Ptyas korros (Schlegel, 1837)
Ptyas major (Gunther, 1858)
Zz
Ptyas multicinctus (Roux, 1907)
Ptyas nigromarginata (Blyth, 1854)
Homalopsidae
Hypsiscopus plumbea (Boie, 1827)
Natricidae
Opisthotropis lateralis Boulenger, 1903*
Rhabdophis callichroma (Bourret, 1934)
Rhabdophis subminiatus (Schlegel, 1837)
Xenochrophis flavipunctatus (Hallowell, 1860)
Pseudoxenodontidae
Pseudoxenodon bambusicola Vogt, 1922
Elapidae
Bungarus fasciatus (Schneider, 1801)
Naja atra Cantor, 1842
=
S
es
Z| Za
IIB
Ophiophagus hannah (Cantor, 1836)
Sinomicrurus macclellandi (Reinhardt, 1844)
<
S
a
rs
IB
Pareidae
Pareas hamptoni (Boulenger, 1905)*
Pareas margaritophorus (Jan, 1866)
Viperidae
Ovophis monticola (Gunther, 1864)
Protobothrops mucrosquamatus (Cantor, 1839)
Trimeresurus albolabris Gray, 1842
Testudines
Geoemydidae
Cuora mouhotii (Gray, 1862)
Mauremys sinensis (Gray, 1834)
Trionychidae
| &
Z| Zz
IIB
Pelodiscus sinensis (Wiegmann, 1835)**
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 1-9
<
S
©ZFMK
BHL
i
Blank Page Digitally Inserted
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 11-26
2020 - Filipiak A. et al.
https://do1.org/10.20363/BZB-2020.69.1.011
ISSN 2190-7307
http://www.zoologicalbulletin.de
Research article
urn:|sid:zoobank.org:pub:237955E5-9C3A-4222-8256-EEFOF80BFOF7
Helminths associated with terrestrial slugs in some parts of Europe
Anna Filipiak’’, Solveig Haukeland”’, Kamila S. Zajac’, Dorota Lachowska-Cierlik’ & Bjorn A. Hatteland* °
‘Institute of Plant Protection — National Research Institute, Wladystawa Wegorka 20, PL-60-318 Poznan, Poland
Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), Postboks 115, NO-1431 As, Norway
3 Institute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, PL-30-387 Krakow, Poland
‘Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 9, PL-30-387 Krakow, Poland
5Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, PO Box 7800, NO-5020 Bergen, Norway
°Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), Plant Health and Biotechnology, NIBIO Ullensvang, NO-5781 Lofthus,
Norway
‘icipe, International Institute of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P.O. Box 30772-00100 Nairobi, Kenya
* Corresponding author: Email: a filipiak@iorpib.poznan. pl
'urn:|sid:zoobank.org:author:CS5FE638 | -E42B-4517-A9F5-99CCBC293D78
2urn:Isid:zoobank.org: author: FBDS54FE6-8950-47 1 8-8E9A-28A 6092DF6D9
3urn:Isid:zoobank.org:author:9F 5DCOSE-80CF-4FB2-A AD2-5 1D243834D80
*urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:A5944069-0F77-4B9F-BE12-7B302385C7E2
>urn:Isid:zoobank.org:author:01C01518-F8C6-436A-BA3E-0C73EF95C1C5
Abstract. A survey of helminths associated with terrestrial slugs focusing on the invasive Arion vulgaris and the native A.
ater was conducted on populations from France, Germany, Netherlands, Norway and Poland. In total, 648 terrestrial slugs
were collected from 18 sample sites, and identified by means of morphological examination, dissection of genitalia and
molecular analysis using mitochondrial DNA. In addition to A. vulgaris and A. ater, also A. vulgaris/A. rufus hybrids and
A. ater/A. rufus hybrids were collected. Helminth species were identified based on morphological features and sequencing
of the 18S and ITS rDNA regions. The parasites included four nematode species: Alloionema appendiculatum, Angiosto-
ma sp., Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita, Entomelas sp., two trematode species: Brachylaima mesostoma, Eurytrema sp.,
and one cestode (tapeworm) species: Skrjabinia sp. Alloionema appendiculatum was the most common helminth in the
investigated slug populations. Furthermore, we found higher prevalence of trematodes in the invasive A. vulgaris compa-
red with the native A. ater, while differences in the prevalence for nematodes were not as clear.
Keywords. Slugs, Arionidae, helminth parasites, nematodes, trematodes, tapeworm.
INTRODUCTION
Parasitism plays an important role in the ecology and
evolution of terrestrial gastropods (slugs and snails) influ-
encing the evolution of sexual reproduction, life-history
traits as well as host resistance leading to host-parasite
co-evolution. Parasites have a direct impact on life cycles
of their hosts, and the effects of parasites can be modu-
lated by environmental factors. Several studies have been
conducted on the impact of climate change on crop pests
in relation to natural enemies such as insect predators,
parasitoids, pathogenic microorganisms, and helminth
parasites (Gerard et al. 2013; Wilson et al. 2015). The
presence of helminths in slugs can be influenced by the
size, age and the spatial isolation of the host population
and by habitat characteristics (Baur & Baur 2005; Gerard
et al. 2013; Wilson et al., 2012; Wilson et al. 2015).
Different groups of helminths can be associated with
terrestrial gastropods, but slugs as hosts have been given
most attention (Ross et al. 2010a; Ross et al. 2010b; Ross
Received: 10.10.2019
Accepted: 14.01.2020
et al. 2016). Currently more than 25,000 species of nem-
atodes have been described, of which around 3,500 are
parasitic nematodes of invertebrates (Laznik et al. 2010).
Nematodes parasitise both slugs and snails, however slugs
are parasitised more frequently and by a greater diversity
of nematodes than snails (Mengert 1953). This 1s because
slugs usually inhabit soil, thus increasing their exposure
to nematodes (Morand et al. 2004; Ross et al. 2010a).
Currently, representatives of eight nematode families are
known to be associated with terrestrial slugs: Agfidae, Al-
aninematidae, Alloionematidae, Angiostomatidae, Cos-
mocercidae, Diplogasteridae, Mermithidae, and Rhab-
ditidae (particularly the genus Phasmarhabditis) (Ross
et al. 2017). These families are known to form a number
of different relationships with slugs, including parasitic
(specialist or generalist), phoretic and necromenic asso-
ciations (Ross et al. 2010b; Ross et al. 2017). Moreover,
trematodes, mites, sporozoa, ciliates, and cestodes have
also been described to interact with slugs (Stephenson &
Knutson 1966; Baur & Baur 2005).
Corresponding editor: B. Huber
Published: 20.02.2020
12 Anna Filipiak et al.
Terrestrial gastropods are considered to be one of the
most successful and diverse animal groups in terrestrial
ecosystems (Barker 2001). Many of them have become
invasive species in the context of expanding their range
of distribution and generating economic damages (e.g.,
Lissachatina fulica Bowdich, 1822 and Deroceras retic-
ulatum Miller, 1774) (Hammond & Byers 2002; Ross
et al. 2010a). One of the 100 most invasive species in Eu-
rope is Arion vulgaris Moquin-Tandon, 1855, commonly
known as the Spanish slug. It has probably been unin-
tentionally introduced into new habitats via plant matter,
packaging, and waste materials (Kozlowski 2007; Hat-
teland et al. 2013; Zajac et al. 2017). It is a major defoli-
ator of plants and causes severe damage in orchards and
gardens as well as in crops (Gren et al. 2009). This slug
has been assumed to originate from the Iberian Peninsula
and spread into Central Europe in the 1950s (Frank et al.
2002), although recent studies suggest a more northern
origin, possibly in France (Hatteland et al. 2015; Zemano-
va et al. 2016). Monitoring the spread of A. vulgaris is
difficult because the pest 1s morphologically similar to
the other closely related, large arionids (A. ater Linnaeus,
1758; A. rufus Linnaeus, 1758; A. magnus Torres Min-
guez, 1923; A. lusitanicus Mabille, 1868; A. flagellus
Collinge, 1893) that occur in Europe. Avion ater, A. rufus
and A. vulgaris can hybridise with each other (Roth et al.
2012; Dreijers et al. 2013) and introgression has readi-
ly been shown, especially between A. ater and A. rufus
(Hatteland et al. 2015; Zemanova et al. 2017). Moreover,
A. vulgaris may outcompete native slug species because
of its large size and high population densities (Frank
2003). Native slugs like A. ater and A. rufus have been
observed to decline and/or disappear in areas colonized
by invasive slugs such as A. vulgaris in continental Eu-
rope (Falkner 1990) and Scandinavia (B. A. Hatteland
pers. obs.) and a similar pattern seems to occur where
A. flagellus has been introduced in Britain (Davies 1987).
There are numerous hypotheses regarding what makes
species invasive. Release from natural enemies is regard-
ed to be an important factor supporting invasiveness by
many organisms (Torchin et al. 2003). The enemy release
hypothesis (ERH) states that the lack of natural enemies
in an invader’s introduced range influences its abundance
or impact (e.g., estimated using individual size, popula-
tion abundance, or propensity to displace native species)
(Torchin et al. 2003; Colautti et al. 2004). Torchin et al.
(2003) studied parasite burdens in 26 species of invasive
animals and found that most of them had fewer parasites
in their introduced areas compared with their home rang-
es. Indeed, it is less likely that hosts will spread parasites
into their introduced range since introduced populations
often originate from relatively small subsets of native
populations (and sometimes from uninfected life-histo-
ry stages) (Torchin et al. 2003). However, recent studies
have shown that A. vulgaris hosts a range of parasites in
introduced areas as well as relatively high parasitic loads
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 11-26
compared with other native slug species (Ross et al.
2010a; Ross et al. 2016).
This study describes results on the diversity and dis-
tribution of helminths associated with A. vulgaris and
A. ater in Europe, 1.e., France, Germany, Netherlands,
Norway and Poland.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Collection and identification of slugs and helminths
Slugs were collected from 18 sites in Europe (France,
Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Poland) in 2015 and
2016 from late August to October (Table 1). Sites were
selected based on information from local growers and
gardeners as well as advisory services in the region re-
garding the presence of slugs. At each site more than 10
slugs were collected and sent to the Institute of Environ-
mental Sciences (Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Po-
land) and Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research
(NIBIO, As, Norway). Slugs were identified by means
of morphological examination guided by von Proschwitz
(2009), dissection of their genitalia and molecular anal-
ysis using a fragment of mitochondrial cytochrome c
oxidase subunit I (COI, mtDNA). The main features of
the genitalia in A. vu/garis are the small atrium, almost
symmetrical, one-partite, bursa copulatrix oval and a
free oviduct with a short, thin posterior end and a thick,
rapidly expanding anterior end with a large, asymmetric
ligula inside (Wiktor 2004). The main characteristics of
A. ater are the atrium and vagina considerably narrower
than spermatheca, oviduct narrow and the spermatheca
spherical (Welter-Schultes 2012). During the dissection
of slugs, a piece of tissue was taken for DNA extraction
and preserved in 96% ethanol at -80°C.
Slugs were checked for potential helminths, which
were identified using a combination of morphological
and molecular techniques. The helminths were first clas-
sified morphologically as nematodes or trematodes un-
der a stereomicroscope Olympus SZX10. For purposes
of molecular identification, all helminth samples (..e.,
adults, juveniles and cysts) were transferred to Eppen-
dorf tubes containing 70% ethanol. Each helminth was
introduced to a separate Eppendorf tube.
DNA isolation, amplification and sequencing
DNA extraction of slugs was performed using a commer-
cial DNA extraction kit (NucleoSpin® Tissue, Mache-
rey-Nagel, Duren, Germany), which uses a proteinase
K to digest proteins within cell membranes and columns
with silica membranes and buffers for cleaning extracted
DNA. PCR reactions were performed to obtain a frag-
ment of mitochondrial DNA with LCO1490/HC02198
primers (Folmer et al. 1994). A PCR reaction was per-
©ZFMK
Helminths associated with terrestrial slugs in some parts of Europe 13
formed in a reaction mixture of 20 ul per each sample and
consisted of 3 ul of template DNA, 0.6 ul of each primer,
2 ul of 10x buffer, 13 wl of ddH20, 0.6 ul of 20 mM
dNTP and 0.2 ul of DreamTaq™ DNA Polymerase
(Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., MA, USA). PCR condi-
tions included 5 min initial denaturation at 94°C and then
1 min denaturation at 94°C, 1 min 30 s annealing at 45°C
and 1 min 30 s elongation at 72°C for 5 cycles and then
1 min denaturation at 94°C, 1 min 30 s annealing at 50°C
and 1 min elongation at 72°C for 35 cycles followed by
a final elongation step for 5 min at 72°C. A volume of 5
ul sample of PCR product was run ona 1.0% agarose gel
for 30 min at 100 V to check DNA quality. PCR products
were cleaned up by commercial kit (NucleoSpin® Gel
and PCR Clean-up, Macherey-Nagel, Duiren, Germany).
The sequencing reaction was performed in a reaction
mixture of 10 pl per each sample and consisted of 2 ul of
template DNA, 5.85 ul of ddH20, 0.15 ul of primer, | ul
of 5x buffer and 1 ul of Terminator (BrightDye® Termi-
nator Cycle Sequencing Kit, MCLAB, South San Fran-
cisco, USA). Sequencing products were cleaned by using
a kit to remove terminators after sequencing reactions
(ExTerminator, A&A Biotechnology, Gdynia, Poland).
The sequencing reactions were performed in Molecular
Ecology Lab, Institute of Environmental Sciences (Jagi-
ellonian University, Krakow, Poland).
The genomic DNA of helminths was isolated with a
QIAamp DNA Micro Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany)
according to the protocol provided by the manufactur-
er. DNA concentration and its purity were measured
using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scien-
tific, Waltham, MA, USA). Polymerase chain reactions
(PCR) were performed on the partial 18S and ITS rDNA
regions. For nematodes, the ITS region was amplified us-
ing two sets of primers, i.e. 18S/26S (Vrain et al., 1992),
and N93/N94 (Nadler et al. 2005). Amplification of the
18S region was done with 24F/18P primers (Blaxter
et al. 1998). DNA of trematodes and cestodes was am-
plified using 3S/A28 primers for ITS2 region (Bowles
et al. 1995). PCR were performed in a reaction mixture
of 20 ul per each sample and consisted of 1 ul of template
DNA (100 ng of template DNA in 1 ul volume), | ul of
each forward and reverse primer (0.5 uM), 10 ul of 2x
DreamTaq™ Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.,
MA, USA) and 7 ul of sterile distilled water. The PCR
amplifications were performed as described in Nermut’
et al. (2015) for the 18S/26S primers, Nadler et al. (2005)
for N93/N94 primers, Ross et al. (2010b) for 24F/18P,
and Prasad et al. (2007) for 3S/A28. A volume of 5 ul
sample of PCR product was run ona 1.5% agarose gel for
30 min at 100 V to check DNA quality. For rDNA partial
sequences, PCR products were sequenced with primers
used for PCR reactions. Sequencing was performed by
Genomed (Warsaw, Poland). Contigs assembled were de-
termined using BioEdit version 7.1.3.0 (Hall 1999).
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 11-26
Phylogenetic analysis
The molecular phylogenetic status of helminths was
determined using BioEdit version 7.1.3.0 for multiple
sequence alignments (Hall, 1999). Multiple nucleotide
sequence alignments were generated using also other se-
quences deposited in GenBank showing the highest sim-
ilarity to the sequence of examined helminths (Appendix
I). The species names and GenBank accession numbers
of the sequences compared to the analyzed helminths are
shown in the phylograms. Phylogenetic trees were gen-
erated using MEGA X (Kumar et al. 2018) by maximum
likelihood (ML) and neighbour-joining (NJ) algorithms.
The base substitution model was determined for the 18S
and ITS using MEGA X under the Bayesian Information
Criterion. The percentage of replicate trees in which the
associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test
(1000 replicates) are shown next to the branches. Boot-
strap values above 60% were considered. Branch lengths
indicate evolutionary rates expressed as the number of
base differences per site.
Statistical analyses of prevalence
A comparison of parasite prevalence was carried out
between the invasive A. vulgaris and the native A. ater.
Hybrid slugs were not included since the number of spec-
imens was low. Generalized linear models (GLMs) with
binomial distribution were used to test possible differ-
ences in presence/absence of nematodes and trematodes,
respectively. All specimens from all investigated popu-
lations were included in the data set. Locality was used
as an explanatory factor in addition to slug species to
test the prevalence of the two different parasite groups.
Statistical analyses were performed in the software R (R
Core Team 2017).
RESULTS
Slug identification
All collected slugs were identified based on morphology
and genital morphology and sequences of cytochrome c
oxidase subunit I (COI) based on BLAST search results.
In total, 20 European populations were investigated,
which included 13 populations of A. vulgaris (Norway
— 9, Poland — 2, France — 1, Germany — 1), and five popu-
lations of A. ater (all in Norway). Additionally, two pop-
ulations of hybrids were collected, one population of A.
ater/A. rufus (Klepp, Norway) and one population of A.
vulgaris/A. rufus (Zoetermeer, Netherlands). From these
sites a total of 648 slugs of the genus Arion were col-
lected comprising 490 A. vulgaris, 92 A. ater, 44 A. vul-
garis/A. rufus hybrids and 22 A. ater/A. rufus hybrids
(Table 1).
©ZFMK
14 Anna Filipiak et al.
Helminth identification and prevalence
Helminths were found associated with slugs at 17 of the
18 sample sites in Europe (94.4%). A total of 501 (77.3%)
of 648 examined slugs were infected with helminths. All
slug taxa were infected with nematodes. Trematodes
were found in A. vulgaris and A. ater, and cestodes in
A. vulgaris and A. ater/A. rufus hybrids. In A. vulgaris,
359 specimens were infected with helminths, 1.e., 148
with nematodes (A/loionema appendiculatum Schneider,
1859; Angiostoma sp.; Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita
Schneider, 1859), 198 with trematodes (Brachylaiama
mesostoma Rudolphi, 1803) and 13 with cestodes (Sk7j-
abinia sp.). In A. ater, 74 of the 92 dissected specimens
were infected with helminths, 1.e., 57 with nematodes
(A. appendiculatum, P. hermaphrodita, Angiostoma sp.
and Entomelas sp.), and 17 with trematodes (B. mesosto-
ma, Eurytrema sp.). In A. vulgaris/A. rufus, 43 of the 44
dissected slugs were infected with nematodes (A. ap-
pendiculatum). In the 22 dissected A. ater/A. rufus, 25
helminths were found, 1.e., 23 nematodes (A. appendicu-
latum, P. hermaphrodita), and 2 cestodes (Skrjabinia sp.)
(Table 1).
Nematodes were found in slugs at 14 of the 18 visited
sites (Norway — 11, France — 1, Netherlands — 1, Poland
— 1; 77.8% of all sample sites), trematodes at 12 of the
18 sites (Norway — 11, France — 1; 66.7% of all sample
sites), and cestodes at five of the 18 sites (Norway — 4,
Germany — 1; 27.8% of all sample sites). A total of four
nematode species (A. appendiculatum, Angiostoma sp.,
P. hermaphrodita, Entomelas sp.), two trematode species
(B. mesostoma, Eurytrema sp.) and one cestode (Skrja-
binia sp.) species were identified based on morpholog-
ical and molecular identification (Table 1; explanation
regarding the three species Entomelas sp., Eurytrema sp.,
and Skrjabinia sp. being listed as “genus sp.” is provided
in the paragraph “Phylogenetic analysis” below).
From sites positive for nematodes, A. appendiculatum
was recorded in 11 sites, P. hermaphrodita in eight sites,
Angiostoma sp. in five sites, and Entomelas sp. in only
one site. For sites positive for trematodes, B. mesostoma
was found 1n 11 sites, and Eurytrema sp. in only one site.
All cestodes were identified as Skrjabinia sp. (Table 1).
Phylogenetic analysis
In total, 501 sequences of the 18S and ITS rDNA regions
were generated (Table 1). These sequences represented
seven species of helminths from seven families. Sequenc-
es of the same species were identical across the 18S and
ITS rDNA regions, so only one representative sequence
was submitted for each taxon. Obtained sequences of hel-
minth species have been deposited in GenBank with the
following accession numbers: KY355082—K Y355088
(Table 2).
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 11-26
BLAST search for three species sequences did not
show exact matches with other sequences deposited in
GenBank. The sequence of KY355086 revealed 92.98%
identity with Entomelas dujardini Maupas, 1916 (ac-
cession number: KF999591), sequence of KY355087
revealed 90.46% identity with Eurytrema pancreaticum
Janson, 1889 (accession number: KY490000), and se-
quence of KY355088 revealed 83.63% identity with
Skrjabinia cesticillus Molin, 1858 (accession number:
AY382321). Other sequences were characterised by
very low query coverage, resulting in low total scores
of BLAST searches. None of the sequences available
in GenBank were significantly similar to sequences ob-
tained in this study for these three species. Therefore,
these three detected helminths (1.e., Entomelas sp., Eu-
rytrema sp., and Skrjabinia sp.) are listed in the study as
“genus sp.”
Trees that were inferred from maximum-likelihood
(ML) and neighbor joining (NJ) revealed identical to-
pologies. Thus only maximum-likelihood results are pre-
sented along with bootstrap support from each method
of analysis (Figs 1-6). The molecular phylogenetic trees,
generated from partial 18S and ITS of rDNA regions with
ML and NJ algorithms, showed that the detected nema-
todes belonged to the species A. appendiculatum (Fig. 1)
and P. hermaphrodita (Fig. 2), and to the genus Angiosto-
ma sp., and Entomelas sp. The molecular phylogenetic
analysis revealed that these two nematodes are closely
related to Angiostoma margaretae and A. norvegicum
(Fig. 3), and Entomelas dujardini (Fig. 4). BLAST
search for Angiostoma sequences revealed 100% iden-
tity with Angiostoma margaretae Ross, Malan, Ivanova,
2011 (accession number: HQ115062) and Angiostoma
norvegicum Ross, Haukeland, Hatteland, Ivanova, 2017
(accession number: KU712560). Due to the fact that not
enough material was available for molecular work, the
28S and COI could not be used for the identification of
these nematodes. Therefore, the nematodes were listed as
Angiostoma sp. In the study of Singh et al. (2019), partial
18S and D2D3 sequences from the same DNA material
were also found to be almost 100% similar to sequences
from two different species. The evolutionary history of
A. appendiculatum was inferred by using the ML meth-
od based on the General Time Reversible (GTR) model,
and P. hermaphrodita, Angiostoma sp. and Entomelas sp.
based on the Tamura 3-parameter model.
The molecular phylogenetic trees, generated from par-
tial ITS of rDNA regions with ML and NJ algorithms,
showed that the detected trematodes belong to the spe-
cies B. mesostoma and to the genus Eurytrema sp.
(Fig. 5). The molecular phylogenetic analysis revealed
that this trematode is closely related to E. pancreaticum.
The ML method based on the GTR model indicate the
evolutionary history of B. mesostoma and Eurytrema sp.
The molecular phylogenetic trees, generated from par-
tial ITS of rDNA regions with ML and NJ algorithms,
©ZFMK
Helminths associated with terrestrial slugs in some parts of Europe
Table 1. The prevalence (%) of infection of terrestrial slugs with parasite species collected in Europe
(N = number of slugs examined).
Locality
France:
Metz
Germany:
Gauting
Netherlands:
Zoetermeer
Norway:
Balestrand
Hana, Sandnes
Horten
Jensvoll, Bodo
Kjenneveien,
Fredrikstad
Kristiansand
Oslo
Lindhjem, Larvik
Manstad, Fredrikstad
Klepp
Vesteroya, Sandefjord
Bergen
Time, Bryne
Poland:
Igotomia
Rzeszow
GPS coordinates
49°71" N
6°10'59" BR
48°4"1"N
Mee
52°03’54’"N
4°30°31”E
61°10’39"N
6°24°14”"E
69°3171”"N
2022" E
59°25" N
LOE235 39 "E
67°16’5”N
14°24’°0”E
59°14’59""N
LOPS 30FE
58°10°1”N
8°00" E
59°57°41°N
10337 13°F
59°0’42”N
9°58°34”"E
59°16’°9”"N
10°46’°7” E
58°46’59""N
3°35°60”E.
59°6’14”"N
10°14°34”E
60°23°37°N
52238 EB.
58°43’59""N
5 BF 0" E
S0°5 200M
20°14’20”E
50°1’59”N
22 ON SE
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 11-26
Slug species
Arion vulgaris
Arion vulgaris
Arion vulgaris/
A. rufus
Arion ater
Arion ater
Arion vulgaris
Arion vulgaris
Arion ater
Arion vulgaris
Arion vulgaris
Arion vulgaris
Arion vulgaris
Arion vulgaris
Arion ater/A. rufus
Arion ater
Arion ater
Arion vulgaris
Arion vulgaris
Arion vulgaris
Arion vulgaris
20
20
44
20
19
112
25
100
20
Parasite species
Alloionema appendiculatum
Brachylaima mesostoma
Skrjabinia sp.
Alloionema appendiculatum
Alloionema appendiculatum
Brachylaima mesostoma
Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita
Alloionema appendiculatum
Eurytrema sp.
Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita
Alloionema appendiculatum
Brachylaima mesostoma
Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita
Skrjabinia sp.
Brachylaima mesostoma
Angiostoma sp.
Brachylaima mesostoma
Entomelas sp.
Alloionema appendiculatum
Brachylaima mesostoma
Angiostoma sp.
Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita
Alloionema appendiculatum
Angiostoma sp.
Brachylaima mesostoma
Skrjabinia sp.
Brachylaima mesostoma
Skrjabinia sp.
Alloionema appendiculatum
Brachylaima mesostoma
Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita
Alloionema appendiculatum
Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita
Skrjabinia sp.
Angiostoma sp.
Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita
Alloionema appendiculatum
Angiostoma sp.
Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita
Alloionema appendiculatum
Angiostoma sp.
Brachylaima mesostoma
Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita
Alloionema appendiculatum
Brachylaima mesostoma
Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita
Alloionema appendiculatum
bs
%
65
15
40
nS
©ZFMK
Anna Filipiak et al.
Alloionema appendiculatum KJ&851561
wee Alloionema appendiculatum KY355082
100/100
97/a3
B17
100/100
67/61
100/100
Neoalloionema tricaudatum KR817921
Alloionema sp. KP204849
Neoalloionema sp. KX017496
Strongyloides procyonis AB205054
Strongyloides fuelleborni AB272235
Strongyloides callosciureus AB272229
Strongyloides robustus AB2/2232
Rhabditophanes sp. KP204851
a
0.10
Steinernema feltiae AB243439
Fig. 1. Unrooted maximum likelihood phylogeny of ITS rDNA regions for A//oionema appendiculatum. The scale bar represents
0.10 substitutions per nucleotide position. Only bootstrap values above 60% are shown.
1
0.10
Angiostoma margaretae MF 192968
—— Angiostoma norvegicum MK214816
Angiostoma gandavensis MK214815
Angiostoma dentiferum MK214814
Phasmarhabditis neopapillosa FJ516760
Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita FJ516761
Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita KM510202
Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita KY355083
Agfa flexilis MK214813
Caenorhabditis elegans FJ589007
Fig. 2. Unrooted maximum likelihood phylogeny of ITS rDNA regions for Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita. The scale bar rep-
resents 0.10 substitutions per nucleotide position. Only bootstrap values above 60% are shown.
showed that the detected cestodes belong to the genus
Skrjabinia sp. (Fig. 6). The molecular phylogenetic anal-
ysis (ML method based on the Hasegawa-Kishino- Yano
model) revealed that this cestode is most closely related
to S. cesticillus and Raillietina echinobothrida.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 11-26
Statistical analyses of prevalence
A tendency of higher prevalence of trematodes was found
in A. vulgaris populations compared with A. ater popu-
lations (Fig. 7; GLM, p=0.0618). On the other hand, a
©ZFMK
Helminths associated with terrestrial slugs in some parts of Europe 17
Table 2. The accession numbers of examined slug-parasites with NCBI matches.
Parasite GenBank no. NCBI match Query | Percentage Source
family/species coverage | identity
Family:
Alloionematidae
Alloionema KY355082 Alloionema appendiculatum; 100 98.95 Nermut’ et al. (2015)
appendiculatum KJ851581
Family:
Rhabditidae
Phasmarhabditis KY355083 Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita, | 100 100 =
hermaphrodita FJ516761
Family:
Angiostomatidae
Angiostoma sp. KY355084 Angiostoma margaretae;, 100 100 Ross et al. (2011)
HQ115062
Angiostoma norvegicum; 100 100 Ross et al. (2017)
KU712560
Family:
Rhabdiasidae
Entomelas sp
KY355086 Entomelas dujardini; 100 92.98 Tkach et al. (2014)
KF999591
Family:
Brachylaimidae
Brachylaima mesostoma
KY355085 Brachylaima mesostoma; 100 100 Heneberg ef al. (2016)
KT074964
Family:
Dicrocoeliidae
Eurytrema sp. KY355087 Eurytrema pancreaticum; 99 90.46 Su et al. (2018)
KY490000
Family:
Davaineidae
Skrjabinia sp. KY355088 Skrjabinia cesticillus;
AY382321 81 83.63 —
somewhat lower prevalence of nematodes in A. vulgaris
than in A. ater (Fig. 8) was revealed, although this differ-
ence was not significant (GLM, p=0.1569).
DISCUSSION
This study presents the occurrence of helminths associ-
ated with two slug species: A. vulgaris and A. ater, as
well as A. vulgaris/A. rufus hybrids, and A. ater/A. rufus
hybrids in some parts of Europe, 1.e., France, Germany,
Netherlands, Norway and Poland. Previous studies on the
diversity and distribution of slug parasites have focused
on the presence of nematodes in slugs (Mengert 1953;
Gleich et al. 1977; Charwat & Davies 1999; Laznik et al.
2009; Ross et al. 2010b; Ross et al. 2011; Ivanova et al.
2013; Ross et al. 2016; Singh et al. 2019). In our study, a
total of seven species of helminths were found to be asso-
ciated with these slugs including nematodes, trematodes
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 11-26
and one cestode species. The nematodes were identified
to Alloionema appendiculatum, Angiostoma sp., Phas-
marhabditis hermaphrodita, Entomelas sp., trematodes
were identified as Brachylaima mesostoma, Eurytrema
sp., and the cestode species was identified as Skrjabinia
sp. We found a tendency for higher prevalence of trem-
atodes in A. vulgaris compared with the native A. ater.
However, we did not find the same pattern in terms of
prevalence for nematodes.
Slug-parasitic nematodes were found in all organs of
the body cavity and also on foot muscles, typical of A. ap-
pendiculatum. The most intensively studied species of
slug-parasitic nematode of agricultural and horticultural
crops is P. hermaphrodita. In our survey, P. hermaphro-
dita was found in eight of the 18 sample sites examined,
and was found to parasitize both A. ater, A. vulgaris, as
well as A. ater /A. rufus hybrids. Only juveniles of P. her-
maphrodita were detected in our study. Within the Rhab-
ditidae family, Phasmarhabditis is the only genus that
©ZFMK
18 Anna Filipiak et al.
Angiostoma margaretae HQ115062
Angiostoma dentiferum MK214806
Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita FJ516755
8v@8L_ Phasmarhabditis neopapillosa FJ516754
Phasmarhabditis californica KM510210
sasa| Angiostoma dentifera FJ516752
Phasmarhabditis papillosa KM510211
Oscheius chongmingensis EU273597
Oscheius insectivora AF083019
Pellioditis marina AF08&3021
Angiostrongylus vasorum AJ920365
Heterorhabditis indica LN611143
Steinernema feltiae FJ381667
——___—1
0.020
Fig. 3. Unrooted maximum likelihood phylogeny of 18S rDNA regions for Angiostoma sp. The scale bar represents 0.020 substi-
tutions per nucleotide position. Only bootstrap values above 60% are shown.
Rhabdias bufonis KF999593
Rhabdias engelbrechti MG428406
Rhabdias bulbicauda KF999600
Rhabdias bermani KF999610
Rhabdias elegans KF999604
Rhabdias pseudosphaerocephala EU836873
L Rhabdias bakeri EU360831
Rhabdias tarichae MH023523
Rhabdias picardiae MG195567
Rhabdias sylvestris KJO18/77
Pneumonema sp. KF999603
Pneumonema tiliquae KF999611
Entomelas entomelas KF999592
Entomelas sp. KF999601
- Entomelas dujardini KF999591
Entomelas sp. KY355086.
99!
Sfeinernema feltiae AB243439
I j
0.10
Fig. 4. Unrooted maximum likelihood phylogeny of ITS rDNA regions for Entomelas sp. The scale bar represents 0.10 substitu-
tions per nucleotide position. Only bootstrap values above 60% are shown.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 11-26 ©ZFMK
Helminths associated with terrestrial slugs in some parts of Europe 19
Leucochloridium paradoxum KP903688
' Leucochloridium sp. AY258145
Leucochloridium vogtianum KP903700
Leucochloridium perturbatum KP903707
Brachylaima sp. JX010634
Brachylaima mesostoma KT074964
Brachylaima mesostoma KY355085
Clinostomum album KU708008
Clinostomum marginatum KU708007
greet Macroderoides sp. HQ680850
__ 9498] Macroderoides texanus EU&50398
Macroderoides flavus HQ680851
Dicrocoelium hospes EF 102026
Lutztrema attenuatum KU563718
Eurytrema sp. KY355087
Concinnum ten AB521802
Eurytrema pancreaticum KY490000
Opisthorchis viverrini MG797539
i
0.10
Fig. 5. Unrooted maximum likelihood phylogeny of ITS rDNA regions for Brachylaima mesostoma and Eurytrema sp. The scale
bar represents 0.10 substitutions per nucleotide position. Only bootstrap values above 60% are shown.
Railletina echinobothrida MH122787
_ 84/96 Skrabinia cesticillus AY382321
S08 Skrabinia sp. KY355088
Parorchites zederi KP893424
Hymenolepis nana LC389873
Mesocestoides litteratus MH936660
— Mesocestoides sp. MH936661
Proteocephalus torulosus AY375549
Raillietina sp. MK201802
Raillietina beveridgei AY382318
a7199 Raillietina dromaius AY382320
88/97| Raillietina australis AY382317
“°L__ Raillietina chiltoni AY382319
Hymenolepis diminuta MF 143799
TOO/TOO]
oe
0.20
Fig. 6. Unrooted maximum likelihood phylogeny of ITS rDNA regions for Skrjabinia sp. The scale bar represents 0.20 substitutions
per nucleotide position. Only bootstrap values above 60% are shown.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 11-26 ©ZFMK
20 Anna Filipiak et al.
10
08
0.6
Trematode prevalence
o4
02
0.0
Arion ater
Anon vulgans
Fig. 7. Boxplot of trematode prevalence (proportionally) in
populations of Arion vulgaris and A. ater.
is considered to be truly parasitic towards slugs. P. her-
maphrodita is known to be capable of killing many spe-
cies of slugs from several families (Morand et al. 2004;
Wilson et al. 2012). The nematode has been formulated
into an effective biological control agent (Tan & Grewal
2001; Wilson et al. 2015). Infective dauer juveniles (a
non-feeding survival stage) of P. hermaphrodita seek out
the host through a combination of both chemotactic and
chemokinetic responses towards chemical attractants in
slug feces and mucus from the foot and mantle (Rae et al.
2006; Hapca et al. 2007).
Another nematode known to be associated with ter-
restrial gastropods is Alloionema appendiculatum. This
nematode has a broad geographical distribution and has
been found in areas including Europe, Australia and
North America (Morand et al. 2004; Laznik et al. 2009;
Nermut’ et al. 2015). In our study, A. appendiculatum
was found in 11 of the 18 sample sites examined. The
nematode was found to parasitize A. ater, A. vulgaris,
and A. ater /A. rufus and A. vulgaris/A. rufus hybrids. A.
appendiculatum is a common juvenile parasite of many
terrestrial gastropods. This nematode has both parasitic
and free-living life stages. During the parasitic cycle,
third-stage juveniles (J3) enter the slug’s body through its
foot, where the nematodes moult to the fourth-stage juve-
nile (J4) which become encapsulated in the pedal muscu-
lature. These juveniles then exit the slug and moult into
free-living immature adults (Cabaret & Morand 1990;
Laznik et al. 2009). In our study we also identified An-
giostoma sp., present in five of the 18 sample sites exam-
ined. The nematode was found to parasitize both A. ater
and A. vulgaris. With the recent discovery of A. gandav-
ensis, the total number of described species of the genus
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 11-26
0.6 0.8 1.0
Nematode prevalence
0.4
0.2
0.0
Arnon ater
Arion vulgaris
Fig. 8. Boxplot of nematode prevalence (proportionally) in
populations of Arion vulgaris and A. ater.
Angiostoma is now 19, of which 15 are described from
molluscan hosts (Singh et al. 2019). International surveys
reveal that molluscan angiostomatids are present in Eu-
rope, North America, Africa, South-East Asia and New
Zealand (Ivanova & Wilson 2009; Ivanova & Spiridonov
2010; Ross et al. 2010a, b; Ross et al. 2011; Ross et al.
2017).
The other nematode identified in our study was En-
tomelas sp. The nematode was only found in one of the
18 sample sites examined, and only in the native A. ater.
Entomelas sp. is classified in the family Rhabdiasidae,
which includes up to 100 known nematode species par-
asitic in amphibians and reptiles. All share some mor-
phological characters but the most remarkable feature
of rhabdiasids is the regular alternation of parasitic and
free-living generations (heterogony) in their life cycles
(Tkach et al. 2014). Entomelas dujardini and E. entome-
las are commonly associated with Anguis fragilis. Ex-
perimental infection of the slugs Deroceras reticulatum
(Agriolimacidae) and Arion subfuscus (Arionidae) with
infective larvae of E. entomelas and E. dujardini has re-
vealed that both slug species are classed as paratenic (eu-
paratenic) hosts for these nematode species (Kuzmin &
Sharpilo 2000).
Among the detected parasites were also trematodes,
1.e., B. mesostoma and Eurytrema sp. We found B. me-
sostoma in 11 of the 18 sample sites examined and it
was found in both A. ater and A. vulgaris. The genus
Brachylaima contains 72 species that parasitize mam-
mals and birds as definitive hosts around the world, ex-
cept Antarctica. Terrestrial gastropods are involved as
first and second intermediate hosts. They are important
from a public health point of view, as they cause diseases
©ZFMK
Helminths associated with terrestrial slugs in some parts of Europe 2
in humans like hemorrhagic enteritis, diarrhea, inflam-
mation of the bile ducts, and anemia (Sirgel et al. 2012;
Suleman & Khan 2016; Valente et al. 2016).
The trematode Eurytrema sp. was found in one of the
18 sample sites, in A. ater only. Species of Eurytrema are
natural parasites of domestic animals (e.g., cattle, goats,
sheep, pigs, dogs) and wild ruminants (such as buffalos,
camels, deer) as well as monkeys and humans parasit-
izing pancreatic ducts and bile ducts. Rarely, terrestrial
snails of various species (e.g., Bradybaena similaris) are
intermediate hosts for these parasites (Pinheiro & Am-
ato 1994). These parasites often cause epithelial hyper-
plasia, hypertrophy of pancreatic ducts, and periductal
fibrosis that lead to eurytrematosis (Cai et al. 2012; Man-
ga-Gonzalez & Ferreras 2014).
Terrestrial slugs can also be associated with tape-
worms. One of the most common tapeworm affecting
poultry systems is Davainea proglottina and the inter-
mediate hosts are gastropods. Tapeworm segments that
pass through poultry feces are ingested by snails and
slugs (of the genera Agriolimax, Arion, Cepaea and Li-
max) and within three weeks a cysticercoid is produced.
Adult tapeworms are produced in the infected host 8-15
days after ingestion of an infected snail or slug (Jordan &
Pattison 1996).
In our study, the tapeworm Skrjabinia sp. was found in
five of the 18 sample sites examined. The tapeworm was
found in A. vulgaris and A. ater/A. rufus hybrids. Skrj-
abinia is a genus of tapeworms that includes helminth
parasites of vertebrates, mostly of birds. One of the most
common parasitic platyhelminths in modern poultry fa-
cilities throughout the world is S. cesticillus. It is a rela-
tively harmless species among intestinal cestodes in spite
of a high prevalence. Sometimes called “broad-headed
tapeworm”, it infects the small intestine of chicken and
occasionally other birds, such as guinea fowl and tur-
key, which are generally in close proximity to backyard
poultry (Kaufmann 1996; Morishita & Schaul 2007).
Our study showed that, in some cases, a single slug was
infected with up to two different species of parasites
(i.e., by two species of nematodes or by one species of
nematode and one species of trematode). Two different
parasites detected from one host was also sometimes
observed in a study by Singh et al. (2019). Moreover,
our study confirmed that endoparasitic helminths appear
to have a broad host range of slug species (Ross et al.
2010b; Singh et al. 2019). Alloionema appendiculatum
was reported from all four different slug species, P. her-
maphrodita from three, Angiostoma sp. from two, B. me-
sostoma from two, and Skrjabinia sp. also from two.
The enemy release hypothesis suggests that species
become invasive due to a lack of enemies in their in-
troduced areas (Mitchell & Power 2003; Torchin et al.
2003). However, Colautti et al. (2004) suggested that
there are strong, enemy-specific effects on host survival
and that hosts have developed tailored defenses. Thus,
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 11-26
one may expect that it is the release from specific ene-
mies that causes direct changes to survivorship, fecundi-
ty, biomass, or demographic variables that really matters.
Alternatively, the loss of enemies against which a host
is well defended would be of little consequence for the
host populations (Colautti et al. 2004). We found a con-
trasting pattern in our study, suggesting that the preva-
lence of trematodes in invasive slugs is higher than in
native species. The role of trematodes in slugs should be
further investigated including comparative studies with
nematodes.
The anthropogenic spread of slugs may potentially
lead to a higher degree of mixing of slug populations
than would occur when spread naturally. This may also
include the spread of parasites along with their slug
hosts, which may have implications for the prevalence
of trematodes and cestodes that use slugs as intermediate
hosts and thus may become more common in domestic
mammals such as cattle and sheep.
Acknowledgements. The authors would like to thank Kar-
in Westrum, Henrik Anztée-Hyllseth, Elisa Baluya Gauslaa
(NIBIO, Norway) and Daniel Kubler (Jagiellonian University,
Poland) for help in dissections of slugs. The authors would fi-
nally like to thank two anonymous reviewers for valuable com-
ments and Bernhard A. Huber (Bonn zoological Bulletin) for
useful suggestions during the peer review.
Financial support. This work was supported by the Pol-
ish-Norwegian Research Programme (Pol- Nor/201888/77).
REFERENCES
Barker GM (2001) The biology of terrestrial molluscs. CABI
Publishing, Wallingford, UK
Baur A, Baur B (2005) Interpopulation variation in the preva-
lence and intensity of parasitic mite infection in the land snail
Arianta arbustorum. Invertebrate Biology 124: 194-201
Blaxter ML, de Ley P, Garey JR, Liu LX, Scheldeman P, Vi-
erstraete A, Vanfleteren JR, Mackey LY, Dorris M, Frisse
LM, Vida JT, Thomas WK (1998) A molecular evolutionary
framework for the phylum Nematoda. Nature 392: 71—75
Bowles J, Blair D, McManus DP (1995) A molecular phyloge-
ny of the human schistosomes. Molecular Phylogenetics and
Evolution 4: 103-109
Cabaret J, Morand S (1990) Single and dual infection of the
land snail Helix aspersa with Muellerius capillaris and Allo-
ionema appendiculatum (Nematoda). Journal for Parasitolo-
gy 76: 579-580
Cai Z, Zhang Y, Ye X (2012) Phylogenetic relationships of the
genus Eurytrema from domestic and wild animal based on
18S rRNA sequences. Parasitology Research 111: 1637-
1644
Charwat SM, Davies KA (1999) Laboratory screening of nem-
atodes isolated from South Australia for potential as biocon-
trol agents of helicid snails. Journal of Invertebrate Patholo-
gy 74: 55-61
Colautti RI, Ricciardi A, Grigorovich IA, MaclIsaac HJ (2004)
Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothe-
sis? Ecology Letters 7: 721-733
©ZFMK
22 Anna Filipiak et al.
Davies MJ (1987) Arion flagellus Collinge and A. /usitanicus
Mabille in the British Isles. A morphological, biological and
taxonomic investigation. Journal of Conchology 32: 339-354
Dreijers E, Reise H, Hutchinson JMC (2013) Mating of the
slugs Arion lusitanicus auct. non Mabille and A. rufus (L.):
Different genitalia and mating behaviours are incomplete
barriers to interspecific sperm exchange. Journal of Mollus-
can Studies 79: 51-63
Falkner G (1990) Binnenmollusken. In: Fechter R & Falkner
G (eds) Weichtiere. Europdische Meeres- und Binnenmol-
lusken. Steinbachs Naturfihrer, Mosaik Verlag, Miinchen
Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R (1994)
DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome
c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mo-
lecular marine biology and biotechnology 3: 294—299
Frank T (2003) Influence of slug herbivory on the vegetation
development in an experimental wildflower strip. Basic and
Applied Ecology 4: 139-147
Frank T, Bieri K, Speiser B (2002) Feeding deterrent effect of
carvone, a compound from caraway seeds, on the slug Arion
lusitanicus. Annals of Applied Biology 141: 93-100
Gerard PJ, Barringer JRF, Charles JG, Fowler SV, Kean JM,
Phillips CB, Tait AB, Walker GP (2013) Potential effects of
climate change on biological control systems: case studies
from New Zealand. BioControl 58:149-162
Gleich JG, Gilbert FF, Kutscha NP (1977) Nematodes in ter-
restrial gastropods from central Maine. Journal of Wildlife
Disease 13: 43-46
Gren I-M, Isacs L, Carlsson M (2009) Costs of alien invasive
species in Sweden. Ambio 38: 135-140
Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence
alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/
NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95—98
Hammond RB, Byers RA (2002) Agriolimacid and arionid as
pests slugs in conservation tillage soybean and corn cropping
in North America. In: Barker GM (ed.) Molluscs as Crop
Pests. CABI Publishing
Hapca S, Crawford J, Rae R, Wilson M, Young I (2007) Move-
ment of the parasitic nematode Phasmarhabditis hermaph-
rodita in the presence ofmucus fromthe host slug Deroceras
reticulatum. Biological Control 41: 223—229
Hatteland BA, Roth S, Andersen A, Kaasa K, Stoa B, Solhoy
T (2013) Distribution and spread of the invasive slug Arion
vulgaris Moquin-Tandon in Norway. Fauna norvegica 32:
13-26
Hatteland BA, Solhoy T, Schander C, Skage M, von Proschwitz
T, Noble LR (2015) Introgression and differentiation of the
invasive slug Arion vulgaris from native A. ater. Malacolo-
gia 58: 303-321
Heneberg P, Sitko J, Bizos J (2016) Molecular and compara-
tive morphological analysis of central European parasitic
flatworms of the superfamily Brachylaimoidea Allison, 1943
(Trematoda: Plagiorchiida). Parasitology 143: 455-474
Ivanova ES, Wilson MJ (2009) Two new species of Angiostoma
Dujardin, 1845 (Nematoda: Angiostomatidae) from British
terrestrial molluscs. Systematic Parasitology 74: 113-124
Ivanova ES, Spiridonov SE (2010) Angiostoma glandicola sp.
n. (Nematoda: Angiostomatidae): a parasite in the land snail
Megaustenia sp. from the Cat Tien Forest, Vietnam. Journal
of Helminthology 84: 297-304
Ivanova ES, Panayotova-Pencheva MS, Spiridonov SE (2013)
Observations on the nematode fauna of terrestrial molluscs of
the Sofia area (Bulgaria) and the Crimea peninsula (Ukraine).
Russian Journal of Nematology 21: 41-49
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 11-26
Jordan FTW, Pattison M (1996) Poultry Diseases. W.B. Saun-
ders Company Ltd, London
Kaufmann J (1996) Parasites of poultry. In: Kaufmann J (ed.)
Parasitic Infections of Domestic Animals: A Diagnostic
Manual. Birkhauser Verlag, BaselKoztowski J (2007) The
distribution, biology, population dynamics and harmfulness
of Arion lusitanicus Mabille, 1868 (Gastropoda: Pulmonata:
Arionidae) in Poland. Journal of Plant Protection Research
47: 219-230
Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA
X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across com-
puting platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35:
1547-1549
Kuzmin YI, Sharpilo VP (2000) On the paratenic parasitism in
the nematodes from the family Rhabdiasidae - parasites of
anguid lizards (Anguidae). Vestnik zoologii 34: 99-101
Laznik Z, Ross JL, Timea T, Lakatos T, Vidrih M, Trdan S
(2009) First record of the nematode A/loionema appendic-
ulatum Schneider (Rhabditida: Alloionematidae) in Arioni-
dae sulgs in Slovenia. Russian Journal of Nematology 17:
137-139.
Laznik Z, Ross JL, Trdan S (2010) Massive occurrence and
identification of the nematode Alloionema appendiculatum
Schneider (Rhabditida: Alloionematidae) found in Arionidae
slugs in Slovenia. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica 95: 43-49.
Manga-Gonzalez MY, Ferreras MC (2014) Dicrocoeliidae fam-
ily: major species causing veterinary diseases. Advances in
Experimental Medicine and Biology 766: 393-428
Mengert H (1953) Nematoden und Schneken. Zeitschrift fiir
Morphologie und Okologie Tiere 41: 311-349
Mitchell CE, Power AG (2003) Release of invasive plants from
fungal and viral pathogens. Nature 421: 625-627
Morand S, Wilson MJ, Glen DM (2004) Nematodes (Nemato-
da) parasitic in terrestrial gastropods. Pp. 525—557 in: Barker
GM (ed) Natural enemies of terrestrial molluscs. CABI Pub-
lishing. Wallingford
Morishita TY, Schaul JC (2007) Parasites of birds. Pp. 217-302
in: Baker DG (ed) Flynn’s Parasites of Laboratory Animals (2
ed.). Blackwell Publishing Professional Ames, IowaNadler
SA, D’Amelio S, Dailey MD, Paggi L, Siu S, Sakanari JA
(2005) Molecular phylogenetics and diagnosis of Anisakis,
Pseudoterranova, and Contracaecum from Northern Pacific
marine mammals. Journal of Parasitology 91: 1413-1429
Nermut’ J, Piza V, Mraéek Z (2015) Re-description of the
slug-parasitic nematode Alloionema appendiculatum Schnei-
der, 1859 (Rhabditida: Alloionematidae). Nematology 17:
897-910
Pinheiro J, Amato SB (1994) Eurytrema coelomaticum (Dige-
nea: Dicrocoeliidae): the effects of infection on carbohydrate
contents of its intermediate snail host, Bradybaena similaris
(Gastropoda, Xanthonychidae). Memorias do Instituto Os-
waldo Cruz 89: 407-410
Prasad PK, Tandon V, Chatterjee A, Bandyopadhyay S (2007)
PCR-based determination of internal transcribed spacer
(ITS) regions of ribosomal DNA of giant intestinal fluke,
Fasciolopsis buski (Lankester, 1857) Looss, 1899. Parasitol-
ogy Research 101: 1581-1587
R Core Team (2017) R: A language and environment for sta-
tistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing,
Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
Rae RG, Robertson JF, Wilson MJ (2006) The chemotactic
response of Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita (Nematoda:
Rhabditida) to cues of Deroceras reticulatum (Mollusca:
Gastropoda). Nematology 8: 197—200
©ZFMK
Helminths associated with terrestrial slugs in some parts of Europe 23
Ross JL, Ivanova ES, Severns PM, Wilson MJ (2010a) The role
of parasite release in invasion of the USA by European slugs.
Biological Invasions 12: 603-610
Ross JL, Ivanova ES, Spiridonov SE, Waeyenberge L, Moens
M, Nicol GW, Wilson MJ (2010b) Molecular phylogeny of
slug-parasitic nematodes inferred from 18S rRNA gene se-
quences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 55: 738—
743
Ross JL, Ivanova ES, Malan AP (2011) Angiostoma margaretae
n. sp. (Nematoda: Angiostomatidae) a parasite of the milac-
id slug Milax gagates Draparnaud collected near Caledon,
South Africa. Systematic Parasitology 79: 71-76
Ross JL, Ivanova ES, Hatteland BA, Brurberg MB, Haukeland
S (2016) Survey of nematodes associated with terrestrial
slugs in Norway. Journal of Helminthology 90: 583-587
Ross JL, Haukeland S, Hatteland BA, Ivanova ES (2017) An-
giostoma norvegicum n. sp. (Nematoda: Angiostomatidae) a
parasite of arionid slugs in Norway. Systematic Parasitology
94: 51-63
Roth S, Hatteland BA, Solhoy T (2012) Some notes on repro-
ductive biology and mating behaviour of Arion vulgaris Mo-
quin-Tandon 1855 in Norway including a mating experiment
with a hybrid of Arion rufus (Linnaeus 1758) x ater (Linnae-
us 1758). Journal of Conchology 41: 249-258
Singh PR, Couvreur M, Decraemer W, Bert W (2019) Survey of
slug-parasitic nematodes in East and West Flanders, Belgium
and description of Angiostoma gandavensis n. sp. (Nemato-
da: Angiostomidae) from arionid slugs. Journal of Helmin-
thology: 1-11
Sirgel WF, Artigas P, Bargues MD, Mas-Coma S (2012) Life
cycle of Renylaima capensis, a brachylaimid trematode of
shrews and slugs in South Africa: two-host and three-host
transmission modalities suggested by epizootiology and
DNA sequencing. Parasites & Vectors 5: 169. https://doi.
org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-169
Stephenson JW, Knutson LV (1966) A resume of recent studies
of invertebrates associated with slugs. Journal of Economic
Entomology 59: 356—360
Su X, Zhang Y, Zheng X, Wang XX, Li Y, Li Q, Wang CR
(2018) Characterization of the complete nuclear ribosomal
DNA sequences of Eurytrema pancreaticum. Journal of Hel-
minthology 92: 484-490
Suleman S, Khan MS (2016) First report of the genus Brachylai-
ma Dujardin, 1843 (Trematoda: Brachylaimidae) from the
small intestine of common myna (Acridotheres tristis) of dis-
trict Swabi, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Turkish Journal
of Zoology 40: 595-600
Tan L, Grewal PS (2001) Infection behavior of the rhabditid
nematode Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita to the grey gar-
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 11-26
den slug Deroceras reticulatum. Journal of Parasitology 87:
1349-1354
Tkach VV, Halajian A, Kuzmin Y (2014) Phylogenetic affini-
ties and systematic position of Entomelas sylvestris Baker,
1982 (Nematoda: Rhabdiasidae), a parasite of Breviceps syl-
vestris FitzSimons (Amphibia: Brevicipitidae) in South Afri-
ca. Systematic Parasitology 87: 293-298
Torchin ME, Lafferty KD, Dobson AP, McKenzie VJ, Kuris
AM (2003) Introduced species and their missing parasites.
Nature 421: 628-630
Valente R, Diaz JD, Salomon OD, Navone GT (2016) The role
of Phyllocaulis variegatus (Mollusca: Veronicellidae) in the
transmission of digenean parasites. Revista Mexicana de
Biodiversidad 87: 255—257
von Proschwitz T (2009) Snigel: fridstorare 1 6rtagarden: veten-
skap och fakta. Smaskrifter utgivna av Bohuslans museum.
Uddevalla, Sweden: Bohuslaéns museum
Vrain TC, Wakarchuk DA, Levesque AC, Hamilton RI (1992)
Intraspecific rDNA restriction fragment length polymorp-
hism in the Xiphinema americanum group. Fundamental and
Applied Nematology 15: 563-573
Welter-Schultes FW (2012) European non-marine molluscs,
a guide for species identification/Bestimmungsbuch fir eu-
ropaische Land- und Stisswassermollusken. Planet Poster
Editions, Gottingen
Wiktor A. (2004) Slimaki ladowe Polski. Mantis, Olsztyn (In
Polish)
Wilson MJ, Burch G, Tourna M, Aalders LT, Barker G (2012)
The potential of a New Zealand strain of Phasmarhabditis
hermaphrodita for biological control of slugs. New Zealand
Plant Protection 65: 161-165
Wilson MJ, Digweed AJ, Brown J, Ivanonva ES, Hapca SH
(2015) Invasive slug pests and their parasites — temperature
responses and potential implications of climate change. Biol-
ogy and Fertility of Soils 51: 739-748
Zajac KS, Gawel M, Filipiak A, Kramarz P (2017) Arion vul-
garis Moquin-Tandon, 1855 — the aetiology of an invasive
species. Folia Malacologica 25: 81-93
Zemanova MA, Knop E, Heckel G (2016) Phylogeographic
past and invasive presence of Arion pest slugs in Europe.
Molecular Ecology 25, 5747-5764
Zemanova MA, Knop E, Heckel G (2017) Introgressive re-
placements of natives by invading Arion pest slugs. Scien-
tific Reports 7: 14908. https://do1.org/10.1038/s/41598-017-
14619-y
©ZFMK
24
APPENDIX
Anna Filipiak et al.
Species name of helminths, GenBank accession numbers and region of sequences used for phylogenetic analyses.
Fig. number
Species name
Alloionema appendiculatum
Alloionema appendiculatum
Neoalloionema tricaudatum
Alloionema sp.
Neoalloionema sp.
Strongyloides procyonis
Strongyloides fuelleborni
Strongyloides callosciureus
Strongyloides robustus
Rhabditophanes sp.
Steinernema feltiae
Angiostoma margaretae
Angiostoma norvegicum
Angiostoma gandavensis
Angiostoma dentiferum
Phasmarhabditis neopapillosa
Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita
Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita
Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita
Agfa flexilis
Caenorhabditis elegans
Angiostoma margaretae
Angiostoma sp.
Angiostoma norvegicum
Angiostoma dentiferum
Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita
Phasmarhabditis neopapillosa
Phasmarhabditis californica
Angiostoma dentifera
Phasmarhabditis papillosa
Oscheius chongmingensis
Oscheius insectivora
Pellioditis marina
Angiostrongylus vasorum
Heterorhabditis indica
Steinernema feltiae
Rhabdias bufonis
Rhabdias engelbrechti
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 11-26
GenBank
accession n°
KJ851581
KY355082
KR817921
KP204849
KX017496
AB205054
AB272235
AB272229
AB272232
KP204851
AB243439
MF192968
MK214816
MK214815
MK214814
FJ516760
FJ516761
KM510202
KY355083
MK214813
FJ589007
HQ115062
KY355084
KU712560
MK214806
FJ516755
FJ516754
KM510210
FJ516752
KMS510211
EU273597
AF083019
AF083021
AJ920365
LN611143
FJ381667
KF999593
MG428406
Region
18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S8
18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S8
18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S8
18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S8
18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S
18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S
18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S8
18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S8
18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-288
18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S8
18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S8
18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2
18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2
18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2
18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2
ITS1-5.8S-ITS2
ITS1-5.8S-ITS2
ITS1-5.8S-ITS2
ITS1-5.8S-ITS2
18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2
18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S8
18S
18S
18S
18S
18S
18S
18S
18S
18S
18S
18S
18S
18S
18S
18S
ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S
18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S8
Source
Nermut’ et al. (2015)
This study
Ivanowa et al. (2016)
Nermut’ et al. (2015)
Unpublished
Sato et al. (2006)
Sato et al. (2007)
Sato et al. (2007)
Sato et al. (2007)
Nermut’ et al. (2015)
Kuwata et al. (2006)
Unpublished
Singh et al. (2019)
Singh et al. (2019)
Singh et al. (2019)
Unpublished
Unpublished
Tandigan et al. (2014)
This study
Singh et al. (2019)
Imai et al. (2009)
Ross et al. (2011)
This study
Ross et al. (2017)
Singh et al. (2019)
Ross et al. (2010b)
Ross et al. (2010b)
Tandigan ef al. (2014)
Ross et al. (2010b)
Tandigan ef al. (2014)
Liu et al. (2012)
Unpublished (2002)
Unpublished
Chilton et al. (2006)
Unpublished
Unpublished
Tkach et al. (2014)
Kuzmin et al. (2017)
©ZFMK
Helminths associated with terrestrial slugs in some parts of Europe 25
Fig. number | Species name yeas n° Region Source
Rhabdias bulbicauda KF999600 ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S Tkach et al. (2014)
Rhabdias bermani KF999610 ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S Tkach et al. (2014)
Rhabdias elegans KF999604 ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S Tkach et al. (2014)
Rhabdias pseudosphaerocephala | EU836873 ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S Dubey &Shine (2008)
Rhabdias bakeri EU360831 18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-288 | Dare et al. (2008)
Rhabdias tarichae MH023523 18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-288S | Johnson er al. (2018)
Rhabdias picardiae MG195567 18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S | Svitin et al. (2018)
Rhabdias sylvestris KJ018777 ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S Tkach et al. (2014)
Pneumonema sp. KF999603 ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S Tkach et al. (2014)
Pneumonema tiliquae KF999611 ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S Tkach et al. (2014)
Entomelas entomelas KF999592 ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S Tkach et al. (2014)
Entomelas sp. KF999601 ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S Tkach et al. (2014)
Entomelas dujardini KF999591 ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S Tkach et al. (2014)
Entomelas sp. KY355086 ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S This study
Steinernema feltiae AB243439 18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S | Kuwata et al. (2006)
5 Leucochloridium paradoxum KP903688 ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S Heneberg et al. (2016)
Leucochloridium sp. AY258145 ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S Casey et al. (2003)
Leucochloridium vogtianum KP903700 ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S Heneberg et al. (2016)
Leucochloridium perturbatum KP903707 5.8S-ITS2-28S Heneberg et al. (2016)
Brachylaima sp. JX010634 5.8S-ITS2-28S Unpublished
Brachylaima mesostoma KT074964 5.8S-ITS2-28S Heneberg et al. (2016)
Brachylaima mesostoma KY355085 5.8S-ITS2-28S8 This study
Clinostomum album KU708008 18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S | Rosser et al. (2017)
Clinostomum marginatum KU708007 18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S | Rosser et al. (2017)
Macroderoides sp. HQ680850 18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S | Tkach & Kinsella (2011)
Macroderoides texanus EU850398 18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S | Tkach et al. (2008)
Macroderoides flavus HQ680851 18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S | Tkach & Kinsella (2011)
Dicrocoelium hospes EF102026 5.8S-ITS2-28S Maurelli et al. (2007)
Lutztrema attenuatum KU563718 5.8S-ITS2-28S8 Unpublished
Eurytrema sp. KY355087 5.8S-ITS2-28S8 This study
Concinnum ten ABS521802 5.8S-ITS2-28S Sato et al. (2010)
Eurytrema pancreaticum K Y490000 18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-288S | Su et al. (2018)
Opisthorchis viverrini MG797539 5.8S-ITS2-28S Sanpool et al. (2018)
6 Raillietina echinobothrida MH122787 5.8S-ITS2-28S8 Unpublished
Skrjabinia cesticillus AY382321 5.8S-ITS2-28S8 Unpublished
Skrjabinia sp. KY355088 5.8S-ITS2-28S This study
Parorchites zederi KP893424 18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S | Kleinertz et al. (2014)
FHymenolepis nana LC389873 ITS2 Banzai et al. (2018)
Mesocestoides litteratus MH936660 ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S Unpublished
Mesocestoides sp. MH936661 ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S Unpublished
Proteocephalus torulosus AY375549 5.8S-ITS2-28S Scholz et al. (2003)
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 11-26 ©ZFMK
26
Anna Filipiak et al.
GenBank
Fig. number | Species name necestiin na? Region Source
Raillietina sp. MK201802 5.8S-ITS2 Unpublished
Raillietina beveridgei AY382318 5.8S-ITS2-28S8 Unpublished
Raillietina dromaius AY382320 5.8S-ITS2-28S Unpublished
Raillietina australis AY382317 5.8S-ITS2-28S Unpublished
Raillietina chiltoni AY382319 5.8S-ITS2-28S Unpublished
Hymenolepis diminuta MF 143799 ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 Unpublished
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 11-26
©ZFMK
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 27-44
2020 - Das P. et al.
https://do1.org/10.20363/BZB-2020.69. 1.027
ISSN 2190-7307
http://www.zoologicalbulletin.de
Research article
urn:|sid:zoobank.org:pub:C5E25AC5-EF44-43 F6-A4DC-69858D3C8EC8
The Ladybird Beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) of Arunachal Pradesh, East Himalaya, India
with new combinations and new country records
Priyanka Das', Kailash Chandra” & Devanshu Gupta*"
2.3 Zoological Survey of India, M Block, New Alipore, Kolkata-700,053
* Corresponding author: Email: devanshuguptagb4102@gmail.com
'urn:|sid:zoobank.org:author:DCB2893D-CFF9-43A4-9508-0C47389F43E9
2urn:Isid:zoobank.org:author: D26C02D0-9F20-44A E-A 19C-B7AC83B3F67A
3urn:Isid:zoobank.org:author:529E2996-6242-487E-89FD-66DSAEC2486F
Abstract. The present communication on ladybird beetles (Coccinellidae) of Arunachal Pradesh (AP), India, a part of
Eastern Himalayan biodiversity hotspot, reports a total of 44 species belonging to 22 genera and 6 tribes. Thirty-eight
species were examined and illustrated, including three new species records from India: ///eis shensiensis Timberlake,
1943, Afissa rana (Kapur, 1958), and Henosepilachna vigintioctomaculata (Motschulsky, 1857) (first confirmed record
from India), and 26 species as new to Arunachal Pradesh. Epilachna gibbera Crotch, 1874, E. mystica Mulsant, 1850, and
E. undecimspilota Hope, 1831 are transferred to the genus Afissa.
Key words. Checklist, new distributional records, taxonomy, Himalaya.
INTRODUCTION
The family Coccinellidae include around 6,000 described
species belonging to 360 genera and 25 tribes under su-
perfamily Coccinelloidea globally (Seago et al. 2011;
Robertson et al. 2015), of which approximately 430 spe-
cies are known from India (Jadwiszczak & Wegrzyno-
wicz 2003; Poorani 2002b, 2004). The coccinellid fauna
of Indian part of Himalaya is represented by more than
203 species with most of them recorded from North-west
(68 species), Western (107 species), and Central Hima-
laya (133 species), and the eastern Himalaya in the state
of Arunachal Pradesh (AP) remains largely unexplored
(Gupta et al. 2018). The recent contributions on ladybird
beetle fauna of AP have been made by Poorani & Booth
(2016), Poorani & Sambath (2017), Poorani & Thangjam
(2019), and Poorani (2019). Therefore, the present study
is intended to fill this gap in the distribution and report the
previously unrecorded species from the state, along with
the new additions to the ladybird beetle fauna of India.
The present study, collectively with the previously
published data (6 species), reports a total of 44 species
of ladybird beetles belonging to 22 genera and 6 tribes
of family Coccinellidae from the state. Among them,
38 species were examined and illustrated (Figs 1-53).
Whereas, Renius cornutus Li & Wang, 2017, Halyzia
nepalensis Canepari, 2003, Halyzia sanscrita Mulsant,
1853, Harmonia manillana (Mulsant, 1866), Micraspis
unicus Poorani, 2019, and Oenopia chinensis (Weise,
1912) were included from literature. All the species are
Received: 29.05.2019
Accepted: 15.01.2020
listed with their valid names along with their major cita-
tions and their distribution in AP (in districts), India (in
states) and outside India. ///eis shensiensis Timberlake,
1943 and Afissa rana (Kapur, 1958) are recorded for the
first time from India along with the first verified record
of Henosepilachna vigintioctomaculata (Motschulsky,
1857) from India, which was listed from India by Poorani
(2004) in her updated checklist, but without any specific
locality data. Twenty-six species have been reported for
the first time from the state. New combinations are pro-
posed here for three species of Epilachini: Afissa gibbera
(Crotch, 1874), comb. nov., Afissa mystica (Mulsant,
1850), comb. nov., and Afissa undecimspilota (Hope,
1831), comb. nov., based on the phylogenetic classifica-
tion and revision of the world genera of tribe Epilachni-
ni by Tomaszewska & Szawaryn (2016). These species
were previously included in the genus Epilachna.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The materials for the present study collected during re-
cent faunistic surveys to Dihang-Dibang Biosphere Re-
serve, Namdapha National Park, and Tawang districts
of AP along with the specimens, deposited at the Cole-
optera Section of Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata.
The specimens were identified with the help of follow-
ing publications: Dieke (1947), Kapur (1946, 1948),
Bielawski (1961), Iablokoff-Khnzorian (1982), Booth
(1997), Poorani & Booth (2006), Poorani et al. (2008),
Corresponding editor: D. Ahrens
Published: 20.02.2020
28 Priyanka Das et al.
Ren et al. (2009), and Tomaszewska & Szawaryn (2016).
The specimen identifications were verified also with Dr
A.P. Kapur’s Coccinellidae collection present at the Co-
leoptera Section, ZSI. Wherever required, the male gen-
italia was also dissected, cleaned in 10% KOH solution,
and studied for confirming the identity of the species.
The specimens were examined using a Nikon SMZ25
stereo zoom-microscope, and the photographs were tak-
en using DS-R12 camera with NIS Elements BR 5.10.00
imaging software. Images were also slightly modified
using Adobe Photoshop CS3. Scanning electron micros-
copy technique was also used and the images were tak-
en using Carl Zeiss EVO18. The species with a single
asterisk mark (*) are newly recorded from AP whereas
with two asterisks marks (**) are recorded for the first
time from India. The material examined in each species
broadly includes the district in AP, micro locality, date of
collection, number of examples, and collector name. The
specimens are deposited in the National Zoological Col-
lection of Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata (NZSI).
Institutional abbreviations
NZSI = Zoological Survey of India, M Block, New
Alipore, Kolkata, 700053, India;
ZSI-CZRC = Zoological Survey of India, Central
Zone Regional Centre, Vijay Nagar, Jabalpur,
482002, Madhya Pradesh;
NBAIR = National Bureau of Agricultural Insect
Resources, Bellary Road, Bengaluru, 560024,
Karnataka, India;
SCAU = South China Agriculture University,
Guangzhou, 510640, China.
RESULTS
Taxonomic Account
Family Coccinellidae Latreille, 1807
Subfamily Coccinellinae Latreille, 1807
Tribe Aspidimerini Mulsant, 1850
Genus Cryptogonus Mulsant, 1850
1. Cryptogonus bimaculatus Kapur, 1948 (Fig. 1)
Cryptogonus bimaculatus Kapur, 1948: 100, fig. 8D.
Material examined. Papum Pare: Banderdewa,
11.iv.2001 (1 @), leg. Sheela.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Papum Pare),
Assam, Nagaland, and Tamil Nadu. Elsewhere: Bhutan,
China, Myanmar, Nepal, and Thailand (Kapur 1948;
Canepari 1997; Poorani 2002b, 2004; Kovar 2007; Ren
et al. 2009).
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 27-44
2. Cryptogonus quadriguttatus (Weise, 1895) (Fig. 2)*
Aspidiphorus quadriguttatus Weise, 1895: 326.
Cryptogonus quadriguttatus: Weise, 1900: 428; Kapur,
1948: 97, fig. 7A-I.
Cryptogonus quadriguttatus var. conjluens Kapur, 1948:
99.
Cryptogonus quadriguttatus var. nigriscens Kapur, 1948:
Oe.
Material examined. Papum Pare: Banderdewa,
11.iv.2001 (1 9) (25402/H4A), leg. Sheela.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Papum Pare),
Assam, Goa, Nagaland, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Sik-
kim, Tripura, and West Bengal. Elsewhere: Bhutan, and
China (Kapur 1948, 1963; Poorani 2002b, 2004).
Tribe Chilocorini Mulsant, 1846
Genus Renius Li & Wang, 2017
3. Renius cornutus Li & Wang, 2017
Renius cornutus Li & Wang, 2017 in Li et al. 2017: 122,
124.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Tiwarigaow).
Elsewhere: China (Poorani & Thangjam, 2019).
Remarks. R. cornutus was described by Li & Wang
(2017) from China (Tibet), the type material of which
is deposited at SCAU. Recently, Poorani & Thang-
jam (2019) identified and reported this species from
Arunachal Pradesh, based on a female specimen, depos-
ited at NBAIR. We lack this species in our collection,
therefore could not examine the material of the species.
Genus Priscibrumus Kovar, 1997
4. Priscibrumus uropygialis Mulsant, 1853 (Fig. 3)*
Exochomus uropygialis Mulsant, 1853: 196.
Brumus uropygialis. Crotch, 1874: 196.
Exochomus (Exochomus) uropygialis: Barovsky, 1922:
297; Miyatake, 1985: 11-12, figs 19-22.
Priscibrumus uropygialis. Kovart, 1997: 117.
Material examined. Changlang: Namdapha National
Park, 24.vi.2017 (1ex.) (24904/H4A), 361m, leg. J. Saini.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Changlang),
Himachal Pradesh, and Jammu & Kashmir. Elsewhere:
Bhutan, Nepal, and Pakistan (Bielawski 1979; Canepari
1997; Poorani 2002b, 2004).
Tribe Coccinellini Latreille, 1807
Genus Alloneda lablokoff-Khnzorian, 1979
©ZFMK
The Ladybird Beetles of Arunachal Pradesh, East Himalaya, India 29
Figs 1-9. Habitus of (1) Cryptogonus bimaculatus Kapur, 1948; (2) Cryptogonus quadriguttatus (Weise, 1895); (3) Priscibrumus
uropygialis Mulsant, 1853; (4) Alloneda dodecaspilota (Hope, 1831); (5) Calvia albida Bielawski, 1972; (6) Calvia sykesii (Crotch,
1874); (7) Coccinella luteopicta (Mulsant, 1866); (8) Coccinella septempunctata Linnaeus, 1758; (9) Coccinella transversalis
Fabricius, 1781.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 27-44 ©ZFMK
30 Priyanka Das et al.
5. Alloneda dodecaspilota (Hope, 1831) (Fig. 4)*
Coccinella 12-spilota Hope, 1831: 31.
Caria duodecimspilota: Mulsant, 1850: 236.
Aiolocaria dodecaspilota: Crotch, 1874: 178; Kapur,
1963, 26, fig. 9A.
Palaeoneda dodecaspilota: Mader, 1934: 302.
Alloneda dodecaspilota: \ablokoff-Khnzorian,
277, fig. 45b; Miyatake, 1985: 20, figs 38-42.
1932.
Material examined. West Kameng: Bokhar, 27.v.1961
(2 exs) (25302/H4A), 2800m, leg. K.C. Jayram.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (West Kameng),
Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, and West Bengal. Elsewhere:
Bhutan, China, Myanmar, Nepal, Thailand, and Vietnam
(Miyatake 1985; Canepari 1997; Poorani 2002b, 2004).
Genus Calvia Mulsant, 1846
6. Calvia albida Bielawski, 1972 (Fig. 5)*
Calvia albida Bielawski, 1972: 308, figs 131, 132-139;
Booth, 1997: 931, fig. 28, 41; Poorani, 2014: 4, figs 1d, 3.
Material examined. Tawang: Jang, 25.1x.2013 (2 exs)
(25398/H4A), leg. P.P.B.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Tawang), Mani-
pur, Sikkim, Uttar Pradesh, and West Bengal. Elsewhere:
Nepal (Poorani 2002b, 2004; Poorani & Sambath, 2017).
7. Calvia sykesii (Crotch, 1874) (Fig. 6)*
Anisocalvia sykesii Crotch, 1874: 146.
Calvia sykesii: Korschefsky, 1932: 529; Booth, 1997:
930, fig. 27.
Material examined. Changlang: Namdapha National
Park, Deban, 361m, 24.vi.2017 (4 exs) (24906/H4A),
leg. J. Saini.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Changlang), As-
sam, Meghalaya, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, and West Bengal.
Elsewhere: Nepal (Booth 1997; Poorani 2002b, 2004).
Genus Coccinella Linnaeus, 1758
8. Coccinella luteopicta (Mulsant, 1866) (Fig. 7)*
Adalia luteopicta Mulsant, 1866: 45.
Lioadalia luteopicta. Crotch, 1874: 104; Bielawsk1,
1971: 7-8, figs 27-35.
Coccinella luteopicta: lablokoff-Khnzorian, 1982: 395;
Canepari, 1997: 52.
Material examined. East Kameng: Seppo, 3500m,
11.x.1996, (1 ex.) (25303/H4A), leg. S.K. Mondal.
Tawang: 24.1x.2013, (1 ex.) (25304/H4A), leg. P.P.B;
Jang: 26.1x.2013 (1 ex.) (25305/H4A), leg. J. Majumder.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 27-44
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (East Kameng,
Tawang), Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Uttar Pradesh,
and West Bengal. Elsewhere: Bhutan, China, and Nepal
(Poorani 2002b, 2004; Kovar 2007).
9. Coccinella septempunctata Linnaeus, 1758 (Fig. 8)
Coccinella 7-punctata Linnaeus, 1758: 365.
Coccinella septempunctata: Korschefsky, 1932: 486.
Coccinella divaricata Olivier, 1808: 1001.
Coccinella confusa Wiedemann, 1823:72.
Coccinella bruckii Mulsant, 1866: 90; Crotch, 1874: 46.
Coccinella septempunctata brucki: Korschefsky, 1932:
49].
Material examined. West Kameng: Kalaktang, Stn. 17,
17.11.1961, (1 ex.), Rahang, Stn. 34, 17.1v.1961, (1 ex.),
Bomdila Pass, Stn. 33, 17.1v.1961, (1 ex.), Shergaon, Stn.
51, 05.v.1961, (1 ex.), Shergaon, Stn. 25, 08.v.1961, (2
exs), Moshing, Stn. 22, 11.v.1961, (2 exs), But Vill. Stn.
61, 24.vi.1961, (1 ex.), leg. K.C. Jayram. Gandhigram:
22.11.1988 (1 ex.), 26.11.1988 (1 ex.). Papum Pare: Kok-
ila North of Chessa, 21.x.1996 (lex.) (24302/H4A), leg.
A.M. Biswas. Roing: Debang Valley, 25.1.2000 (1 ex.)
(24303/H4A), Deopani, 250m, 29.1.2000 (2 exs) (25306/
H4A), leg. S.K. Mondal. Ziro: Joram, 2.vi.2000 (3 exs)
(24304/H4A), leg. B. Mitra. West Kameng: Tenga,
24.iv.2001 (1 ex.) (25307/H4A), leg. S. Sheela. Chang-
lang: Namdapha National Park, Lankhal Nala, 6.111.2017
(1 ex.) (25308/H4A), Deban River Bed, 345m, 12.11.2017
(2 exs) (24309/H4A), Anamika Fall, 413m, 13.111.2017
(1 ex.) (25310/H4A), leg. J. Saini. Tawang: Zemithang,
24.vi.2017 (3 exs) (24911/H4A), Lumla, 24.vi.2017 (1
ex.) (25311/H4A), 11.iv.2018 (1 ex.) (24912/H4A),
Namtsering, 15.iv.2018 (1 ex.) (24913/H4A)/16.iv.2018
(1 ex.) (24914/H4A), 17.1v.2018 (7 exs) (24915/H4A),
leg. J. Saini. Dihang Dibang Biosphere Reserve, Maliny,
25.x.2017 (5 exs) (24437/H4A), leg. D. Gupta.
Distribution. Widely distributed throughout India in-
cluding Arunachal Pradesh (Gandhigram, Papum Pare,
Roing, Ziro, West Kameng, Changlang, Tawang, Dihang
Dibang Biosphere Reserve). Elsewhere: China, Afro-
tropical Region, North America, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka
(Poorani 2002b, 2004; Kovar 2007; Poorani & Sambath
2017).
10. Coccinella transversalis Fabricius, 1781 (Fig. 9)*
Coccinella transversalis Fabricius, 1781: 97;
Iablokoff-Khnzorian, 1979: 68.
Coccinella repanda Thunberg, 1781: 18.
Material examined. Papum Pare: Kokila North of Ches-
sa, 21.x.1996 (lex.) (24299/H4A), leg. A.M. Biswas;
Balijan, 23.x.1996 (lex.) (24300/H4A), leg. S.K. Mon-
dal; Baderdewa: 11.1v.2001 (2 exs) (24301/H4A), leg.
Sheela. East Siang: Boleng, 18.1.2000 (1 ex.) (25312/
©ZFMK
The Ladybird Beetles of Arunachal Pradesh, East Himalaya, India 31
H4A), leg. S.K. Mondal. Dihang Dibang Biosphere Re-
serve, Maliny, 25.x.2017 (4 exs) (24436/H4A), leg. D.
Gupta.
Distribution. Widely distributed in throughout India
including Arunachal Pradesh (Papum Pare, Baderdewa,
East Siang, Dihang Dibang Biosphere Reserve). Else-
where: Australia, Bangladesh, Indochina, Indonesia,
Japan, Nepal, New Zealand, and Sri Lanka (Poorani
2002b, 2004).
Remarks. It is commonly distributed species in India
but was not earlier reported from the state of Arunachal
Pradesh.
Genus Coelophora Mulsant, 1850
11. Coelophora bissellata Mulsant, 1850 (Fig. 10)*
Coelophora bissellata Mulsant, 1850: 400.
Spilocaria bissellata: Timberlake, 1943: 58.
Lemnia (Spilocaria) bissellata: \ablokoff-Khnzorian,
1979: 62.
Lemnia bissellata: Hoang , 1983: 74; lablokoff-Khnzo-
rian, 1982: 218.
Caria gracilicornis Weise, 1902: 505.
Material examined. Siang, NEFA: 10.xi.1971 (1 ex.
on leaves,) (25318/H4A), leg. S. Ghose. Papum Pare:
Kokila, North of Chessa, 21.x.1996 (1 ex.) (25315/
H4A), leg. A.M. Biswas; Banderdewa, 11.iv.2001 (1 ex.)
(25320/H4A), leg. Sheela. Debang Valley: Kannu North,
1.11.2000 (1 ex.) (25322/H4A), leg. S.K. Mondal. Roing :
Diban Valley, 29.1x.2000 (1 ex.) (25319/H4A), leg. R.S.
Mridha. Itanagar: Ganga Lake, 28.v.2000 (4 exs) (25314/
H4A), leg. T.K.Mondal; Naharlagun, 530m, 29.v.2000
(1 ex.) (25321/H4A), leg. K. Bhattacharya. West Siang:
Aalo (formerly Along), Hissan Colony, 11.vi.2000 (2
exs) (25317/H4A), leg. R.S. Mridha. East Kameng:
Rang, Gthili, 17.1x.2000 (5 exs) (25313/H4A), leg. A.R.
Lahiri. Changlang, Deban Rest House, 4.111.2017 (1 ex.)
(25316/H4A), leg. J. Saini.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Siang, Papum
Pare, Roing, Debang Valley, West Siang, East Kameng,
Changlang), Assam, Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka, Ker-
ala, Manipur, Meghalaya, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Uttar
Pradesh, and West Bengal. Elsewhere: Bhutan, Bangla-
desh, China, Indonesia, Nepal, New Guinea, Philippines,
Thailand, and Vietnam (Poorani 2002b, 2004; Kovar
2007).
Genus Halyzia Mulsant, 1846
12. Halyzia dejavu Poorani & Booth, 2006 (Fig. 11)
Halyzia dejavu Poorani & Booth, 2006: 66, pl. 1B, figs
10-17.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 27-44
Material examined. Changlang: Deban, 24.xii.2017
(lex.) (24905/H4A), leg. J. Saini.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Changlang,
Tawang), Sikkim; Nepal (Poorani & Booth 2006; Poora-
ni & Sambath 2017).
13. Halyzia nepalensis Canepari, 2003
Halyzia nepalensis Canepari 2003: 261, figs 1-2.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh. Elsewhere:
Myanmar, and Nepal (Poorani & Thangjam 2019).
Remarks. Poorani & Thangjam (2019) reported this
species from Arunachal Pradesh, based on photographic
records, which they found identical with the specimens
from Myanmar, deposited at NZSI. The specimens of this
species from Arunachal Pradesh were unavailable with
us for examination.
14. Halyzia sanscrita Mulsant, 1853
Halyzia sanscrita Mulsant, 1853: 152.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Tawang), Hi-
machal Pradesh, Sikkim, and Uttarakhand. Elsewhere:
Bhutan, China, and Nepal (Poorani 2002b, 2004; Kovar
2007; Poorani & Sambath 2017).
Remarks. Poorani & Sambath (2017) recorded this spe-
cies from Tawang, Arunachal Pradesh, based on the spec-
imens, deposited at ZSI-CZRC, which were examined by
the authors.
Genus Harmonia Mulsant, 1846
15. Harmonia dimidiata (Fabricius, 1781) (Fig. 12)
Coccinella dimidiata Fabricius, 1781: 94.
Coccinella dimidia Hope, 1831: 30.
Leis dimidiata. Mulsant, 1850: 242.
Coccinella quindecimmaculata Hope, 1831: 30.
Coccinella bicolor Hope, 1831: 31.
Harmonia dimidiata: Miyatake, 1965: 62.
Material examined. West Kameng: Salari, Stn. 60,
22.v1.1961, (2 exs), But village, Stn. 61, 24.vi.1961,
(lex). Denezi “Sti: ol6. 25 vi 196) s6l.ex))- dee. kK: C2
Jayram.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (West Kameng,
Tawang), Assam, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir,
Manipur, Punjab, Rajasthan, Sikkim, and West Bengal.
Elsewhere: Bhutan, China, Japan, Nepal, and Pakistan
(Poorani 2002b, 2004; Kovar 2007; Poorani & Sambath
2017).
©ZFMK
32 Priyanka Das et al.
16 17 18
Figs 10—18. Habitus of (10) Coelophora bissellata Mulsant, 1850; (11) Halyzia dejavu Poorani & Booth, 2006; (12) Harmonia
dimidiata (Fabricius, 1781); (13) Harmonia eucharis (Mulsant, 1853); (14) Harmonia sedecimnotata (Fabricius, 1801); (15)
Hippodamia variegata (Goeze, 1777); (16) lleis confusa Timberlake, 1943; (17) I/leis indica Timberlake, 1943; (18) Macroilleis
hauseri (Mader, 1930).
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 27-44 ©ZFMK
The Ladybird Beetles of Arunachal Pradesh, East Himalaya, India 33
16. Harmonia eucharis (Mulsant, 1853) (Fig. 13)
Ballia eucharis Mulsant, 1853: 167.
Material examined. West Kameng: Rahung, Stn. 34,
7.1v.1961, (1 ex.), Rahung, Stn. 35, (1 ex.) 24.iv.1961,
leg. K.C. Jayram. Tawang: Zemithang, 24.vi.2017, (1 ),
leg. J. Saini. Dibang Valley, Dihang Dibang Biosphere
Reserve, Mipi, 01.x1.2017 (1 ex), leg. D. Gupta.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Tawang, West
Kameng, Dihang Dibang Biosphere Reserve), Jammu
and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, Manipur, Sikkim, Ut-
tarakhand, and Uttar Pradesh. Elsewhere: China, Myan-
mar, Nepal, and Pakistan (Poorani 2002b, 2004; Kovar
2007; Poorani & Sambath, 2017).
Remarks. See Kovar (2007) for synonyms.
17. Harmonia manillana (Mulsant, 1866)
Caria manillana Mulsant, 1866: 170.
Leis atrocincta Mulsant, 1866: 175.
Neda paulinae Mulsant, 1866: 203.
Leis dunlopi Crotch, 1874: 121.
Leis cerasicolor Crotch, 1874: 121.
Leis aterrima Crotch, 1874: 121.
Leis papuensis Crotch, 1874: 121.
Leis papuensis var. suffusa Crotch, 1874: 121.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Pasighat).
Elsewhere: Philippines, Malaysia, and Indonesia
(lablokoff-Khnzorian 1982; Poorani & Booth 2016).
Remarks. Poorani & Booth (2016) first time record-
ed this species from the Palearctic region of Arunachal
Pradesh, and also mentioned to be very rare in mainland
India. Earlier, the species was known from the oriental
region of Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines. We
could not find specimen of this species from the study
area in our collection.
18. Harmonia sedecimnotata (Fabricius,
(Fig. 14)*
Coccinella sedecimnotata Fabricius, 1801: 370.
Daulis 16-notata: Mulsant, 1850: 296.
Callineda sedecimnotata: Crotch, 1874: 161.
Harmonia sedecimnotata: Timberlake, 1943: 18.
1801)
Material examined. Changlang: Namdapha National
Park, Deban, 24.vi.2017 (3 exs) (24918/H4A), leg. J.
Saini.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Changlang),
Sikkim, and West Bengal. Elsewhere: China, Nepal, and
Southeast Asia (Poorani 2002b, 2004; Kovar 2007).
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 27-44
Genus Hippodamia Chevrolat, 1836
19. Hippodamia variegata (Goeze, 1777) (Fig. 15)*
Coccinella variegata Goeze, 1777: 246.
Adonia variegata: Mulsant, 1846: 39.
Hippodamia variegata: Belicek, 1976: 338.
Hippodamia (Adonia) variegata: \ablokoff-Khnzorian,
1982: 326.
Material examined. West Kameng: Dengzi, Stn. 16,
25.v.1961 (2 exs); Salari, Stn. 60, 22.v1.1961 (2 exs), leg.
K.C. Jayram.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh, Himachal
Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir, Maharashtra, and Uttar
Pradesh. Elsewhere: widely distributed in Afrotropical,
Nearctic, Oriental regions; Afghanistan, China, Nepal,
and Pakistan (Poorani 2002b, 2004; Kovar 2007).
Genus //leis Mulsant, 1850
20. Illeis confusa Timberlake, 1943 (Fig. 16)*
Illeis confusa Timberlake, 1943: 61.
Material examined. Tawang: Zemithang, 24.vi.2017
(13) (24909/H4A), leg. J. Saini.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Tawang), As-
sam, and West Bengal. Elsewhere: China, Nepal, and
Thailand (Poorani 2002b, 2004; Poorani & Lalitha 2018;
Kovar 2007).
21. Illeis indica Timberlake, 1943 (Fig. 17)*
Illeis indica Timberlake, 1943: 61.
Material examined. Tawang: Zemithang, 24.vi.2017 (1
ex.), leg. J. Saini.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Tawang), Jam-
mu & Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, and Uttar Pradesh.
Elsewhere: Pakistan, and Thailand (Poorani 2002b,
2004; Kovar 2007).
22. Illeis shensiensis Timberlake, 1943 (Figs 19—23)**
Illeis shensiensis Timberlake, 1943: 61; Bielawski, 1961:
358, figs 5—6, 14; Ren et al., 2009: 243.
Material examined. Changlang: Deban,
24.xii.2017 (2 64) (25409/H4A), leg. J. Saini.
355- im,
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Changlang).
Elsewhere: China (Shensi), and Pakistan (Kovar 2007;
Hayat et al. 2017).
Remarks: J. shensiensis can be distinguished from
closely related species by the following characters: pro-
©ZFMK
34 Priyanka Das et al.
20
23
Figs 19-23. //leis shensiensis Timberlake, 1943. (19) Habitus; (20) Sipho; (21) Phallobase in dorsal view; (22) Phallobase in
lateral; (23) Apical portion of Sipho.
notum with two small black marks (Fig 19), sipho not
bifid at apex (Fig 23), median lobe of tegmen having
apex strongly curved upward and more or less depressed
(Figs 21, 22), parameres shorter and stouter and some-
what strongly curved at base, otherwise straight (Fig 21).
The male genitalia of our specimen is identical with that
of /. shensiensis as illustrated in Bielawski (1961: 358,
Figs 5—6, 14) and Ren et al. (2009: 243, Fig 325).
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 27-44
Genus Macroilleis Miyatake, 1965
23. Macroilleis hauseri (Mader, 1930) (Fig. 18)
Halyzia hauseri Mader, 1930: 162.
Macroilleis hauseri: Miyatake 1965: 71-73.
Material examined. Tawang: Zemithang, 24.vi.2017 (1
3) (25399/H4A), leg. J. Saini.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Tawang), and
West Bengal. Elsewhere: Bhutan, China, Vietnam, and
©ZFMK
The Ladybird Beetles of Arunachal Pradesh, East Himalaya, India 35
Pakistan (Poorani 2002b; 2004; Kovar 2007; Poorani &
Sambath 2017).
Genus Menocheilus Timberlake, 1943
24. Menocheilus sexmaculata (Fabricius, 1781)
(Fig. 24)
Coccinella sexmaculata Fabricius, 1781: 96.
Material examined. Papum Pare: Bandardewa,
11.iv.2001 (2exs) (24307/H4A), leg. Sheela. Dihang
Dibang Biosphere Reserve, Maliny, 25.x.2017 (2 exs)
(24438/H4A), leg. D. Gupta.
Distribution. Widely distributed in India including
Arunachal Pradesh (Papum Pare; Dihang Dibang Bio-
sphere Reserve). Elsewhere: Australian region, Arab
Emirates, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, China, In-
donesia, Iran, Japan, Malaysia, Myanmar, Nepal, Oman,
Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Philippines, and Vietnam (Poorani
2002b, 2004; Kovar 2007).
Remarks. See Kovafy (2007: 619) for synonymy.
Genus Micraspis Chevrolat, in Dejean, 1836
25. Micraspis univittata (Hope, 1831) (Fig. 25)*
Coccinella univittata Hope, 1831: 31.
Alesia univittata. Mulsant, 1850: 357.
Tytthaspis univittata. Korschefsky, 1932: 384.
Micraspis univittata: lablokoff-Khnzorian, 1982: 511.
Material examined. Along: Hissan Colony, 11.vi.2000
(1 ex.) (25408/H4A), leg. R.S. Mridha.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Along), Andhra
Pradesh, Bihar, Karnataka, Odisha, Tamil Nadu, Tripura,
and Uttarakhand. Elsewhere: China, and Nepal (Poorani
2002b; 2004; Kovar 2007).
26. Micraspis unicus Poorani, 2019
Micraspis unicus Poorani, 2019: 190, fig. 1.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Mayodia).
Remarks. This species was described recently by Poora-
ni (2019) from Arunachal Pradesh, based on male, holo-
type and female paratype, deposited at NBAIR. We could
not find any specimen of this species in our collection.
Genus Oenopia Mulsant, 1850
27. Oenopia chinensis (Weise, 1912)
Coelophora chinensis Weise, 1912: 113.
Gyrocaria chinensis. Miyatake, 1965: 65.
Oenopia chinensis: Hoang, 1983: 91.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 27-44
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Pasighat), and
Meghalaya. Elsewhere: China (Poorani 2002a, 2002b;
2004; Kovar 2007; Poorani & Thangjam 2019).
Remarks. Earlier known from China, this species was
reported from India by Poorani & Thangjam (2019),
based on a female specimen from Meghalaya and larvae
from Arunachal Pradesh, materials of which are deposit-
ed at NBAIR. We could not find any adult specimen of
this species from the study area in our collection.
28. Oenopia kirbyi Mulsant, 1850 (Fig. 26)*
Oenopia kirbyi Mulsant, 1850: 425; Poorani, 2002a: 102,
figs 4, 16, 23, 31.
Gyrocaria kirbyi: Miyatake, 1965: 66, fig. 34.
Material examined. Dihang Dibang Biosphere Re-
serve: Maliney, 27.x.2017 (lex.) (24432/H4A); Anini,
27.x.2017 (lex.) (24433/H4A), leg. D. Gupta. Siang:
NEFA, 10.x1.1971 (1 ex. on leaves) (25404/H4A), leg. S.
Ghose. Roing: Dibang Valley, 250 m, 25.1.2000 (2 exs)
(25405/H4A), 27.1.2000 (1 ex.) (25406/H4A), 29.1.2000
(5 exs) (25407/H4A), leg. S.K. Mondal.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Dihang-Dibang
Biosphere Reserve, Siang, Roing), Meghalaya, Mizoram,
Sikkim, and West Bengal; Bhutan. Elsewhere: China,
Myanmar, Nepal, and Thailand (Poorani 2002a, 2002b,
2004; Kovar 2007).
29. Oenopia mimica Weise, 1902 (Fig. 27)*
Oenopia mimica Weise, 1902: 505; Poorani, 2002a: 104,
figs 5, 17, 24, 32.
Gyrocaria mimica: Miyatake, 1985: 16.
Material examined. Siang: NEFA, 10.x1.1971 (1 ex. on
leaves) (25324/H4A), leg. S. Ghose. Lower Subansiri:
Bandardewa, 19.x.1996 (1 ex.) (25325/H4A), leg. S.K.
Mondal. Tawang: Jung, 23.1x.2013 (2 exs) (25323/H4A),
leg. J. Majumder. Dihang Dibang Biosphere Reserve,
Anini, 25.x.2019 (1 ex.), leg. D. Gupta.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Tawang, Siang,
Lower Subansir1), Himachal Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, and
Sikkim. Elsewhere: Laos, Myanmar, and Nepal (Poorani
2002a, 2002b, 2004; Kovar 2007).
30. Oenopia quadripunctata Kapur, 1963 (Fig. 28)*
Oenopia quadripunctata Kapur, 1963: 27; Poorani,
2002a: 102, fig. 3.
Material examined. Debang Valley:
16.1x.2000 (1 ex.), leg. A.R. Lahiri.
Old Aloppa,
©ZFMK
36 Priyanka Das et al.
30 31 32
Figs 24-32. Habitus of (24) Menocheilus sexmaculata (Fabricius, 1781); (25) Micraspis univittata (Hope, 1831); (26) Oenopia
kirbyi Mulsant, 1850; (27) Oenopia mimica Weise, 1902; (28) Oenopia quadripunctata Kapur, 1963; (29) Oenopia sauzeti Mulsant,
1866; (30) Oenopia sexareata (Mulsant, 1853); (31) Propylea luteopustulata (Mulsant, 1850); (32) Synona melanopepla (Mulsant,
1850).
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 27-44 ©ZFMK
The Ladybird Beetles of Arunachal Pradesh, East Himalaya, India 37
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Debang Val-
ley), Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim, and West
Bengal. Elsewhere: Bhutan, China, Myanmar, and Nepal
(Poorani 2002a, 2002b, 2004; Kovar 2007).
31. Oenopia sauzeti Mulsant, 1866 (Fig. 29)
Oenopia sauzeti Mulsant, 1866: 281; Poorani, 2002a:
103, figs 6, 18, 25, 33.
Gyrocaria sauzeti: Miyatake, 1967: 76; 1985: 15, figs
30-33.
Material examined. Lower Subansiri: Bandardewa,
25.1.2000 (1 ex.) (24295/H4A), leg. S.K. Mondal. West
Kameng, Kalaktang, Stn.17, 17.11.1961 (1 ex.), Dukong-
ko River, 02.v.1961 (1 ex.); Rupa, Stn. 29, 03.v.1961 (1
ex.); Shergaon, Stn. 51, 5.v.1961 (1 ex.)/Stn. 25, 8.v.1961
(2 exs); Domko, Stn. 52, 10.v.1961 (1 ex.); Moshing, Stn.
22, 11.v.1961 (1 ex.); Dengzi, Stn. 16, 25.v.1961 (3 exs);
Ankaling, Stn. 12, 25.v.1961 (1 ex.), leg. K.C. Jayram.
Changlang: Namdapha National Park, 361m, 24.vi.2017
(1 ex.) (24855/H4A), leg. J. Saini.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Changlang:
Namdapha National Park, West Kameng, Lower Suban-
siri), Assam, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir, Me-
ghalaya, Sikkim, Uttar Pradesh, and West Bengal. Else-
where: Bhutan, China, Pakistan, Laos, Myanmar, Nepal,
Thailand, and Vietnam (Poorani 2002a, 2002b, 2004:
Kovar 2007; Poorani & Sambath 2017).
32. Oenopia sexareata (Mulsant, 1853) (Fig. 30)
Coelophora sexareata Mulsant, 1853: 181; Poorani,
2002a: 101, figs 2, 15, 22, 30.
Coelophora sexareata vat. lacerata Sicard, 1913: 500.
Gyrocaria sexareata: Miyatake, 1967: 76.
Oenopia sexareata: Hoang , 1983: 62, 92.
Material examined. West Kameng: Rahung, Stn.35,
24.iv.1961, (1 ex.), Siggun, Stn.50, 4.v.1961, (3 exs),
Denzi, Stn.16, 25.v.1961, (1 ex.) leg. K.C. Jayram, Low-
er Subansiri: Banderdewa, 19.x.1996 (1 ex.) (25327/
H4A), leg. A.M. Biswas. Roing: Dibang Valley, 250m,
25.1.2000 (1 ex.) (25328/H4A), 29.1.2000 (3 exs) leg.
S.K. Mondal. Papum Pare: Bandardewa, 11.iv.2001 (2
exs) (25329/H4A) leg. Sheela. Dihang Dibang Biosphere
Reserve: Maliney, 27.x.2017 (lex.) (24434/H4A) leg. D.
Gupta.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Lower Suban-
sirl, Roing, Papum Pare, West Kameng, Dihang Dibang
Biosphere Reserve), Assam, Bihar, Himachal Pradesh,
Meghalaya, Sikkim, Uttar Pradesh, and West Bengal.
Elsewhere: Bhutan, China, Indonesia, Japan, Myanmar,
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 27-44
Nepal, and Vietnam (Canepari 1997; Poorani 2002a,
2002b, 2004; Kovar 2007).
Genus Propylea Mulsant, 1846
33. Propylea luteopustulata (Mulsant, 1850) (Fig. 31)
Oenopia (Pania) luteopustulata Mulsant, 1850: 421.
Propylea luteopustulata: Vandenberg & Gordon, 1991:
30.
Material examined. West Kameng: Kalaktang, Stn.17,
17.11.1961, (1 ex.); Rahung, Stn. 35, 24.1v.1961, (1 ex.);
Rahung, Stn. 34, 25.1v.1961, (1 ex.); Siggun, Stn. 50,
4.v.1961, (1 ex.); Shergaon, Stn. 25, 08.v.1961 (1 ex.);
Domko, Stn. 52, 10.v.1961, (1 ex.); Moshing, Stn. 22,
ld v. 1961 (lex); Dengzi,; Sti 16> 1S. v.196 1» (1Lex.):
Ankaling, Stn. 12, 15.v.1961 (2 exs), leg. K.C.Jayram;
Zamiri, 14.x.1997 (1 ex.), leg. S.K. Mondal. Siang:
NEFA, 10.x1.1971 (2 exs on leaves), leg. S. Ghose. Low-
er Subansiri: Bandardewa, 19.x.1996 (2 exs), leg. A.M.
Biswas. Tawang: Center Dirang, 15.x1.1997 (2 exs on fo-
liage), leg. A.K. Sanyal. Roing: Debang Valley, Rukmo,
27.1.2000 (2 exs), leg. S.K. Mondal. Changlang: Namda-
pha National Park, 361m, 24.vi.2017 (1 ex.), leg. J. Saini.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Siang, Lower
Subansiri, Tawang, West Kameng, Roing, Changlang),
Assam, Andaman & Nicobar Islands, Himachal Pradesh,
Meghalaya, Uttar Pradesh, Sikkim, and West Bengal.
Elsewhere: Bhutan, China, Myanmar, Nepal, Sri Lan-
ka, Thailand, and Vietnam (Poorani 2002b, 2004; Kovar
2007; Poorani & Sambath 2017).
Genus Synona Pope, 1989
34. Synona melanopepla (Mulsant, 1850) (Fig. 32)*
Synia melanopepla Mulsant, 1850: 376.
Synia melanaria ab. melanopepla: Korschefsky, 1932:
276.
Leis rougeti Mulsant, 1866: 175.
Synia melanaria ab. rougeti: Korschefsky, 1932: 276.
Synona melanopepla: Poorani et al., 2008: 583, figs 1, 2,
17—22,.52, 33.
Material examined. Roing: Dibang Valley, 19.1x.2000
(1 4) (25326/H4A), leg. R.S. Mridha.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Roing), Assam,
Bihar, Karnataka, Meghalaya, Odisha, Tamil Nadu, and
Uttar Pradesh. Elsewhere: Vietnam (Kovay 2007; Poora-
ni et al. 2008).
©ZFMK
38 Priyanka Das et al.
Tribe Epilachnini Mulsant, 1846
Genus A/fissa Dieke, 1947
Tomaszewska & Szawaryn (2016) in their revision of
world genera of Epilachnini, proposed Epil/achna to be
a new world genus and established Afissa as a valid ge-
nus. Here, three species Epilachna gibbera Crotch, 1874,
Epilachna mystica Mulsant, 1850, and Epilachna undec-
imspilota Hope, 1831 are combined with Afissa based
on the shared morphological characters, proposed by
Tomaszewska & Szawaryn (2016) for the genus: Lateral
margins of elytra not or hardly visible dorsally, some-
times narrowly explanate, and meta-ventral and abdomi-
nal post-coxal lines present.
35. Afissa gibbera (Crotch, 1874) comb. nov. (Fig. 33)*
Epilachna gibbera Crotch, 1874: 80.
Afissa gibbera: Kapur, 1963: 10.
Epilachna_ gibbera: Jadwiszczak & Wegrzynowicz,
2003: 69.
Material examined. Tawang: Camp, Stn.
14.xii.1985, (1 3), leg. SK.B. & ANTI.
No.,
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Tawang), and
Sikkim. Elsewhere: Nepal (Poorani 2004).
36. Afissa mystica (Mulsant, 1850) comb. nov. (Figs 41—
50)
Epilachna mystica Mulsant, 1850: 841.
Afissa mystica: Dieke, 1947: 146, figs 100, 169.
Epilachna mystica: Li & Cook, 1961: 51.
Material examined. West Kameng: Munna, 8500 m,
10.x.1996, (4 exs), leg. S.K. Mondal; Bomdila: Sherra
Bash, 30.viii.1998, (3 exs), leg. A.R.Lahiri. East Kameng:
Seppo, 3500m, 11.x.1996, (2 exs), leg. S.K. Mondal.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Tawang, West
Kameng, East Kameng), Karnataka, Sikkim, Uttara-
khand, and West Bengal (North). Elsewhere: Bhutan,
China, Myanmar, and Nepal (Poorani 2004; Kovar 2007;
Poorani & Sambath 2017).
37. Afissa nielamuensis (Pang & Mao, 1977) (Fig. 34)
Epilachna nielamuensis Pang & Mao, 1977: 323, 327;
Miyatake, 1985: 30; Jadwiszczak & Wegrzynowicz,
2003: 94; Ren et al., 2009: 291.
Afissa nielamuensis. Poorani & Thangjam, 2019: 7, figs
6A-B.
Material examined. Tawang: Jang, Jangda, 2,572 m,
24.ix.2018 (1 3), leg. J. Saini.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 27-44
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Tawang).
Elsewhere: China and Nepal (Poorani 2004; Poorani &
Thangjam 2019).
38. Afissa rana (Kapur, 1958) (Figs 51—53)**
Afissula rana Kapur, 1958: 320.
Afissa rana: Tomaszewska & Szawaryn, 2016: 53.
Material examined. West Kameng: Bomdila, Stn. 32,
25.v1.1961 (6 exs), 29.v1.1961 (1 ex.), Dukongko River,
Stn. 49, 02.v.1961 (2 exs), Moshing, Stn. 22, 03.v1.1961
(3 exs), leg. K.C. Jayram; Bomdila, Tinga, 29.v1.1995
(7 exs) (25652/H4A), Sherra Bash, 30.viii.1998 (2 exs)
(25653/H4A).
Type material. Paratype: B.M. Nepal Expedition, 1949
(B.M. 1949-637), Afissula rana gen.n., sp. nov., A.P. Ka-
pur Det., 1954 [ZSI Registration Number: 9983/H4].
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (West Kameng).
Elsewhere: China, and Nepal (Poorani 2004).
Remarks. A. rana can be distinguished from closely re-
lated species by the following characters: lateral margins
of elytra invisible in dorsal view, pronotum reddish-tes-
taceous except for yellowish margins (Fig 51), sipho nar-
row and lancet-shaped at apex (Fig 53), and parameres
shorter than median lobe (Fig 52). The male genitalia of
our specimen is identical with that of A. rana as illus-
trated in the original description by Kapur (1958: 320,
figs 5a, c-f). The paratype of the species NZSI was also
examined.
39. Afissa undecimspilota (Hope, 1831) comb. nov.
(Fige35)*
Coccinella I1-spilota Hope, 1831: 31.
Epilachna undecimspilota: Jadwiszczak & Wegrzyno-
wicz, 2003: 125.
Material examined. West Kameng: Dirang, Rahung,
1830m, 16.vi1.1961, (2 exs), leg. S. Biswas.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (West Kameng),
and Northern India. Elsewhere: China, Bhutan, and Ne-
pal (Poorani 2004; Kovar 2007).
Genus Diekeana Tomaszewska & Szawaryn 2015
40. Diekeana macularis (Mulsant, 1850) (Fig. 36)*
Epilachna macularis Mulsant, 1850: 797.
Solanophila macularis ab. donckieri Weise, 1912: 112.
Afissa macularis: Dieke, 1947: 120, figs 78, 153.
Epilachna macularis. Jadwiszczak & Wegrzynowicz,
2003: 86.
Diekeana macularis. Tomaszewska & Szawaryn, 2016:
74.
©ZFMK
The Ladybird Beetles of Arunachal Pradesh, East Himalaya, India 39
39 40 41
Figs 33-41. Habitus of (33) Afissa gibbera (Crotch, 1874) comb. nov.; (34) Afissa nielamuensis (Pang & Mao, 1977); (35) Afissa
undecimspilota (Hope, 1831) comb. nov.; (36) Diekeana macularis (Mulsant, 1850); (37) Henosepilachna indica (Mulsant, 1850);
(38) Henosepilachna vigintioctomaculata (Motschulsky, 1857); (39) Rodolia fumida Mulsant, 1850; (40) Jauravia quadrinotata
Kapur, 1946; (41) Afissa mystica (Mulsant, 1850) comb. nov.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 27-44 ©ZFMK
40 Priyanka Das et al.
Figs 42-50. Scanning electron microscope images of Afissa mystica (Mulsant, 1850) comb. nov. (42) Habitus in ventral view; (43)
Head in ventral view; (44) Maxilla; (45) Labium; (46) Antennae; (47) Mandible; (48) Tarsal claws; (49) Labrum; (50) Meso-thorax.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 27-44 ©ZFMK
The Ladybird Beetles of Arunachal Pradesh, East Himalaya, India 4]
51
53
Pa
Figs 51-53. Afissa rana (Kapur, 1958). (51) Habitus; (52) Phallobase in dorsal view; (53) Sipho.
Material examined. Lohit: Dapha Bum, Kamlang River,
3020 ft, Stn. No. 23, 22.x11.1969, (4 exs), leg. J.M. Julka.
Tawang: Bomdila, 29.1x.2013 (1 ex. from Astimicia sp.)
(25410/H4A), leg. J. Majumder.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Lohit, Tawang),
and Meghalaya. Elsewhere: China and Nepal (Dieke
1947; Jadwiszczak & Wegrzynowicz 2003; Poorani
2004; Kovar 2007).
Genus Henosepilachna Li, 1961
41. Henosepilachna indica (Mulsant, 1850) (Fig. 37)*
Epilachna indica Mulsant, 1850: 776.
Epilachna ceylonica Weise, 1901: 418.
Epilachna indica: Kapur, 1961: 133-140.
Epilachna tertia Dieke, 1947: 66.
Henosepilachna indica: Jadwiszczak & Wegrzynowicz,
2003: 154.
Material examined. Lower Subansiri: Tamen, 457m,
Stn. No. 17, 18.v.1966 (1 ex.), leg. A.N.T. Joseph. Lo-
hit: Deopani, 350m, Stn. No. 8, 6.111.1969, (3 exs), leg.
S.K.Tandon; Kandu, 300 m, Stn. No. 9, 7.111.1969, (5
exs); Digaru Road, 150m, Stn. No. 12, 11.11.1969 (2
exs); Hayaliaung Road, 700 m, Stn. No. 13, 12.11.1969,
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 27-44
(4 exs); Lohitpur Road, 150m, Stn. No. 14, 13.11.1969
(1 ex.); Namsai, 100 m, Stn. No. 15, 15.111.1969, (1 ex.),
leg. S.K. Tandon.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (Lower Suban-
sirl, Lohit), Assam, and West Bengal. Elsewhere: Bhu-
tan, China, Laos, Myanmar, Nepal, and Vietnam (Dieke
1947; Poorani 2004; Kovar 2007).
42. Henosepilachna vigintioctomaculata (Motschulsky,
1857) (Fig. 38)**
Epilachna vigintioctomaculata Motschulsky, 1857: 40.
Epilachna 28-maculata a. incompleta Mader, 1930: 184.
Epilachna 28-maculata a. coalescens Mader, 1930: 184.
Henosepilachna_ vigintioctomaculata: Jadwiszczak &
Weerzynowicz, 2003: 178.
Material examined. NEFA, Abor, 29.x11.1911, (1 ex.)
leg. S.W. Kemp, New Aloppa: Rang, 17.1x.2000 (4 exs)
(25332/H4A), leg. A.R. Lahiri.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh. Elsewhere:
China, Japan, North Korea, Nepal, Russia, and Vietnam
(Katakura 1981; Poorani 2004).
©ZFMK
42 Priyanka Das et al.
Remarks. This 1s the first verified record of the species
from India, though it has been included from India by
Poorani (2004).
Tribe Noviini Mulsant, 1846
Genus Rodolia Mulsant, 1850
43. Rodolia fumida Mulsant, 1850 (Fig. 39)*
Rodolia fumida Mulsant, 1850: 904.
Rodolia roseipennis Mulsant, 1850: 904.
Rodolia chermesina Mulsant, 1850: 905.
Epilachna arethusa Mulsant, 1853: 254.
Epilachna testicolor Mulsant, 1853: 255.
Material examined. West Kameng: Ankaling, Stn.11,
17.v.1961 (1 ex.), leg. K.C. Jayram.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (West Kameng),
Assam, Bihar, Delhi, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Karna-
taka, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Manipur, Megha-
laya, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and West
Bengal. Elsewhere: China, Myanmar, Pakistan, and Sri
Lanka (Kapur 1949; Poorani 2004; Kovar 2007).
Tribe Sticholotidini Weise, 1901
Genus Jauravia Motschulsky, 1858
44. Jauravia quadrinotata Kapur, 1946 (Fig. 40)*
Jauravia quadrinotata Kapur, 1946: 85; Miyatake, 1985:
3, figs 1-3.
Material examined. West Kameng: 15.11.1961 (1 ex.),
leg. K.C. Jayram.
Distribution. India: Arunachal Pradesh (West Kameng),
Assam, Meghalaya, Sikkim, and West Bengal. Else-
where: Bhutan, China, and Nepal (Bielawski 1972;
Canepari 1997; Poorani 2002b, 2004; Kovar 2007).
Acknowledgements. The authors are thankful to the
Director, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata for
providing necessary facilities. We wish to thank Dr Wang
Xingmin, South China Agriculture University, China,
for his help in providing literature. We are thankful to
Prof Basant Kumar Agarwala, Tripura University for his
beetle collections. We wish to thank Dr Dirk Ahrens and
Dr Ralph S. Peters (Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum
Alexander Koenig, Germany), and an anonymous
reviewer for critically reviewing the manuscript.
REFERENCES
Barovsky V (1922) Revisio specierum palaearticarum Cocci-
nellidarum generis Exochomus Redtb. Annuaire du Musée
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 27-44
Zoologique de |’Académie des Sciences de Russie 23: 289—
303
Belicek J (1976) Coccinellidae of Western Canada and Alaska
with analyses of the transmontane zoogeographic relation-
ships between the fauna of British Columbia and Alberta
(Insecta: Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Quaestiones Entomo-
logicae 12 (4): 283-409
Bielawski R (1961) Bemerkung tiber die mannlichen Geni-
talien von Arten de Gattung ///eis Muls., nebst Beschreibung
einer neuen Art und einer Unterart (Coleoptera, Coccinelli-
dae). Annales Zoologici 19: 353-368
Bielawski R (1971) Uber Coccinellidae (Coleoptera) aus Ne-
pal. Khumbu Himal, Innsbruck-Minchen. Ergebnisse Forsch
Unternehemens Nepal Himalaya 4: 1-9
Bielawski R (1972) Die Marienkafer (Coleoptera: Coccinelli-
dae) aus Nepal. Fragmenta Faunistica 18: 283-312
Bielawski R (1979) Ergebnisse der Bhutan-Expedition 1972
des Naturhistorischen Museums in Basel. Coleoptera: Fam.
Coccinellidae. Entomologica Basiliensia 4: 83—125
Booth RG (1997) A review of the species of Calvia (Coleop-
tera: Coccinellidae) from the Indian Subcontinent, with de-
scriptions of two new species. Journal of Natural History 31:
917-934
Canepari C (1997) Coccinellidae (Coleoptera) from the Nepal
Himalayas. Stuttgarter Beitrage zur Naturkunde Serie A (Bi-
ologie) 565 (65): 1-65
Canepari C (2003) Coccinellidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) of Ne-
pal from the collection of the Naturkundemuseum Erfurt. Pp.
261-265 in: Hartmann M & Baumbach H (eds) Biodiversity
and Natural Heritage of the Himalaya. Vereinder Freunde &
Forderer des Naturkundemuseums Erfurt e.V., Germany
Crotch GR (1874) A Revision of the Coleopterous Family Coc-
cinellidae, E.W. Janson London, 311 pp.
Dieke GH (1947) Lady beetles of the genus Epilachna (sens.
lat.) in Asia, Europe, and Australia. Smithsonian Miscella-
neous Collections 106 (15): 1-183
Fabricius JC (1781) Species Insectorum exhibentes eorum dif-
ferentias specificas, synonyma auctorum, locanatalia, meta-
morphosin adiectis observationibus, descriptionibus. Ham-
burgi et Kilonii, C.E.Bohn 1, 522 pp.
Goeze JAE (1777) Entomologische Beytrage zu des Ritters
Linné zwolften Ausgabe des Natursystems. Erster Theil.
Leipzig, 736 pp.
Gupta D, Chandra K, Das P, Ghosh J (2018) Insecta: Coleop-
tera. Pp. 399-590 in: Chandra K, Gupta D, Gopi KC, Tripa-
thy B & Kumar V (eds), Faunal Diversity of Indian Himala-
ya, Director, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata
Hayat A, Khan MR, Naz F (2017) Subfamilies Coccinellinae
and Coccidullinae (Coccinellidae: Coleoptera) with New Re-
cords from AJK, Pakistan. Journal of Applied Environmental
and Biological Sciences 7 (4): 21-66
Hoang DN (1983) Coccinellidae of Vietnam. Part. 2. Nha zuat
ban khoa hoc va ky thuat, Hanoi, 159 pp.
Hope FW (1831) Synopsis of the new species of Nepal insects
in the collection of Major General Hardwicke. Pp. 21-32 in:
Gray JE (eds), The Zoological Miscellany, Treuttel, Wurtz &
Co., London
Iablokoff-Khnzorian SM (1979) Genera der Paldarktischen
Coccinellini (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Entomologische
Blatter ftir Biologie und Systematik der Kafer 75 (1-2):
37-75
Iablokoff-Khnzorian SM (1982) Les — Coccinelles
Coléopteres-Coccinellidae Tribu Coccinellini des regions
Palearctique et Orientale. Boubée, Paris, 568 pp.
©ZFMK
The Ladybird Beetles of Arunachal Pradesh, East Himalaya, India 43
Jadwiszczak A, Wegrzynowicz, P (2003) World Catalogue of
Coccinellidae. Part I. Epilachninae. Mantis/Olsztyn, Poland,
264 pp.
Kapur AP (1946) A revision of the genus Jauravia Mots. An-
nals and Magazine of Natural History 13 (11): 73-93
Kapur AP (1948) A revision of the tribe Aspidimerini Weise
(Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Transactions of the Royal Ento-
mological Society of London 99 (2): 77-128
Kapur AP (1949) On the Indian species of Rodolia Mulsant
(Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Bulletin of Entomological Re-
search 39: 531-538
Kapur AP (1958) Coccinellidae of Nepal. Records of the Indian
Museum 53 [1955]: 309-338
Kapur AP (1961) Taxonomic notes on Epilachna indica Mul-
sant and description of a new species related to it (Coleoptera:
Coccinellidae). Proceedings of the Royal Entomological So-
ciety of London (Series B, Taxonomy) 30 (9-10): 133-140
Kapur AP (1963) The Coccinellidae of the third Mount Everest
expedition, 1924 (Coleoptera). Bulletin of the British Muse-
um (Natural History), Entomology 14: 1-48
Korschefsky R (1932) Coccinellidae Il. Pars 120. Pp. 1-435
in: Schenkling S (eds) Coleopterorum Catalogus. W. Junk,
Berlin
Kovar I (1997) Revision of the genera Brumus Muls. and Exo-
chomus Redtb. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) of the Palaearctic
region. Part I. Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae
44 (1995): 5-124
Kovar I. (2007) Family Coccinellidae Latreille, 1807. Pp. 568—
631 in: Lobl I & Smetana A (eds) Catalogue of Palaearctic
Coleoptera, Volume 4, Elateroidea-Derodontoidea — Bo-
strichoidea — Lymexyloidea — Cleroidea — Cucujoidea. Apol-
lo Books, Stenstrup
Li CS, Cook EF (1961) The Epilachninae of Taiwan (Col.: Coc-
cinellidae). Pacific Insects 3 (1): 31-91
Li W, Huo L, Ahrens D, Ren S, Wang X (2017) Renius cornu-
tus, anew genus and species of Chilocorini from Tibet, China
(Coleoptera, Coccinellidae). ZooKeys 678: 121-128
Linnaeus C (1758) Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae,
secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteri-
bus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Laurentii Salvi, Holmiae,
Stockholm 10" edition, 826 pp.
Mader L (1930) Evidenz der palaarktischen Coccinelliden und
ihrer aberrationen in Wort und Bild, I-Teil. Epilachnini, Coc-
cinellini, Halyziini und Synonychini. Zeitschrift des Vereins
der Naturbeobachter und Sammler 5: 124—168
Mader L (1934) Evidenz der palaarktischen Coccinelliden und
ihrer aberrationen in Wort und Bild, I-Teil. Epilachnini, Coc-
cinellini, Halyziini und Synonychini. Zeitschrift des Vereins
der Naturbeobachter und Sammler 9: 289-336
Miyatake M (1965) Some Coccinellidae (excluding Scymnini)
of Formosa (Coleoptera). Special Bulletin of the Lepidopter-
ists’ Society of Japan 1: 50-74
Miyatake M (1967) Notes on some Coccinellidae from Nepal
and Darjeeling district of India (Coleoptera). Transactions of
the Shikoku Entomological Society 9: 69-78
Miyatake M (1985) Coccinellidae collected by the Hokkaido
University Expedition to Nepal Himalaya, 1968 (Coleop-
tera). Insecta Matsumurana (New Series) 30: 1-33
Motschulsky Vde (1857) Insectes du Japon. Etudes Ento-
mologiques 6: 25—41
Mulsant E (1846) Histoire Naturelle des coléopteres de France.
Sulcicollis-Sécuripalpes. Maison, Paris 4: 380
Mulsant E (1850) Species des Coléopteres triméres sécurip-
alpes. Annales des Sciences Physiques et Naturelles, d’Ag-
riculture et d’Industrie 2 (2): 1-1104
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 27-44
Mulsant E (1853) Supplément a la monographie des coléopteres
trimeres sécuripalpes. Annales de la Société Linnéenne de
Lyon (N.S.) 1: 129-333
Mulsant E (1866) Monographie des Coccinellides. Savy, Paris,
294 pp.
Olivier AG (1808) Entomologie, ou Histoire Naturelle des
Insectes, avec leurs caractéres génériques et spécifiques,
leur description, leur synonymie, et leur figure enluminée.
Coléopteres. Desray, Paris: 613-1104
Pang XF, Mao JL (1977) Notes on the Epilachninae of Tibet
Autonomous Region (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Acta En-
tomologica Sinica, 20 (3): 323-328
Poorani J (2002a) A review of the genus Oenopia Mulsant (Co-
leoptera: Coccinellidae) of the Indian subcontinent, with de-
scription of a new species. Oriental Insects 36 (1): 97-116
Poorani J (2002b) An annotated checklist of the Coccinellidae
(Coleoptera) (excluding Epilachninae) of the Indian subre-
gion. Oriental Insects 36 (1): 307-383
Poorani J (2004) An annotated checklist of the Coccinellidae
(Coleoptera) of the Indian subregion: 1-90 Online at http://
www.angelfire.com/bug2/j_poorani/checklist.pdf [last ac-
cess on 22 May 2019]
Poorani J (2014) Calvia explanata sp. n. (Coleoptera: Coccinel-
lidae) from Indian Subcontinent. Biodiversity Data Journal 2,
e1164. https//doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1164
Poorani J (2019) A new species of Micrapsis Chevrolet (Cole-
optera: Coccinellidae) from Arunachal Pradesh, India. Zoot-
axa 4559 (1): 189-192
Poorani J, Booth RG (2006) A new sibling species of Haly-
zia straminea (Hope) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Halyziin1)
from the Indian subcontinent. Zootaxa 1354: 63-68
Poorani J, Booth RG (2016) Harmonia manillana (Mulsant), a
new addition to Indian Coccinellidae, with changes in synon-
ymy. Biodiversity Data Journal 4, e8030. Online at http://doi.
org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8030
Poorani J, Sambath S (2017) Insecta: Coleoptera: Coccinell-
idae. Pp. 167-171 in: Director, Zoological Survey of India
(eds), Fauna of Tawang, Arunachal Pradesh. Zoological Sur-
vey of India, Kolkata
Poorani J, Lalitha N 2018. Illustrated accounts of coccinellid
predators of Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) (Hemiptera:
Sternorrhyncha: Pseudococcidae) on mulberry in India, with
description of a new species of Scymnus Kugelann (Coleop-
tera: Coccinellidae) from West Bengal. Zootaxa 4382 (1):
93-120
Poorani J, Thangjam R (2019) New additions to Indian fauna of
Coccinellidae (Coleoptera). Oriental Insects: 1-19 Online at
http://doi.org/10.1080/00305316.2018.1550448 [online first]
Poorani J, Slipitski A, Booth RG (2008) A revision of the genus
Synona Pope, 1989 (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Coccinelli-
ni). Annales Zoologici 58 (3): 579-594
Ren S, Wang X, Pang H, Peng Z, Zeng P (2009) Colored Picto-
rial Handbook of Ladybird Beetles in China. Science Press,
Beijing, 336 pp. [in Chinese]
Robertson JA, Slipinski A, Moulton M, Shockley FW, Gior-
gi A, Lord NP, Mckenna DD, Tomaszewska W, Forrester J,
Miller KB, Whiting MF, Mchugh JV (2015) Phylogeny and
classification of Cucujoidea and the recognition of a new su-
perfamily Coccinelloidea (Coleoptera: Cucujiformia). Sys-
tematic Entomology 40: 745-778
Seago AE, Giorgi JA, Li J, Slipifski A (2011) Phylogeny, clas-
sification and evolution of ladybird beetles (Coleoptera:
Coccinellidae) based on simultaneous analysis of molecular
and morphological data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evo-
lution 60 (1): 137-151
©ZFMK
44 Priyanka Das et al.
Sicard A (1913) Notes sur quelques Coccinellides de I’Inde et
de Birmanie appartenant a la collection de M. Andrewes, de
Londres et description d’especes et de variétés nouvelles.
Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 81 [1912]:
_ 495-506
Slipinski SA (2007) Australian ladybird beetles (Coleoptera:
Coccinellidae) their biology and classification. ABRS, Can-
berra and CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, 762 pp.
Szawaryn K, Bocak L, Slipifski A, Escalona HE, Tomaszewska
W (2015) Phylogeny and evolution of phytophagous ladybird
beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Epilachnini), with recog-
nition of new genera. Systematic Entomology 40: 547-569
Thunberg CP (1781) Dissertatio entomologica. novas Insecto-
rum species, sistens cujus partem primam. J. Edman, Upsali-
ae, 28 pp.
Timberlake PH 1943. The Coccinellidae or lady beetles of the
Koebele collection-Part I. The Hawaiian Planters Record 47:
1-67
Tomaszewska W, Szawaryn K (2016) Epilachnini (Coleoptera:
Coccinellidae) — A revision of the world genera. Journal of
Insect Science 16 (1): 1-91
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 27-44
Vandenberg N, Gordon RD (1991) Farewell to Pania Mulsant
(Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): a new synonym of Propylea
Mulsant. Coccinella 3: 30-35
Weise J (1895) Aspidophorus 4-guttatus n. sp. Deutsche Ento-
mologische Zeitschrift: 326
Weise J (1900) Coccinelliden aus Ceylon gesammelt von Dr.
Horn. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 44: 417-448
Weise J (1901) Contribution a l’etude de la faune ento-
mologique de Sumatra (Chasses de M.J.L. Weyers) xv° arti-
cle. Coccinellides. Annales de la Société Entomologique du
Belgique 45: 91-96
Weise J (1902) Coccinelliden aus der Sammlung des un-
garischen National Museums. Természetrajzi Fuzetek 25:
489-520
Weise J (1912) Uber Hispien und Coccinelliden. Archiv fir
Naturgeschichte 78: 101-120
Wiedemann CRW (1823) Zweihundert neue Kafer von Java,
Bengalen und dem Vorgebirge der guten Hoffnung. Zoolo-
gisches Magazin 2 (1): 3-133
©ZFMK
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 45-54
2020 - Dongmo E.M. et al.
https://do1.org/10.20363/BZB-2020.69.1.045
ISSN 2190-7307
http://www.zoologicalbulletin.de
Research article
urn:Isid:zoobank.org: pub: B856B7FC2-EA09-404C-8542-3458777FE499
Diversity of bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) along an altitudinal gradient
in the western region of Cameroon
Ervis Manfothang Dongmo’, Eric-Moise Bakwo Fils”, Aaron Manga Mongombe’ &
Fernand-Nestor Tchuenguem Fohouo*
"2.3 Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of Maroua, P.O. Box 814, Maroua, Cameroon
*Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Ngaoundéré, P.O. Box 454 Ngaoundéré, Cameroon
* Corresponding author: Email: filshbkw27@gmail.com
'urn:lsid:zoobank. org:author:23 BESFBF-E2DF-4DF5-A34B-9BBC 10OAB5AAC
2urn:Isid:zoobank.org:author:A97 1C795-09AE-49DF-BB2C-51F397E1 8DOF
-urn:|sid:zoobank.org:author: 1556516C-665A-4F8C-9E0A-70C297CD3304
*urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:77453B9B-A647-425B-BDED-E8C8CA929E72
Abstract. We investigated the patterns of bat species richness, abundance and distribution along an altitudinal gradient in
the West region of Cameroon from December 2016 to November 2018 with the use of mist nets. Captures were conducted
at 32 sites distributed over six distinct elevational ranges, comprising five sites in elevation range I (<< 750 ma.s.1.), four
sites in elevation range II (750—1,000 m a.s.1.), eight sites in elevation range IH (1,000—1,250 m a.s.1.), six sites in eleva-
tion range IV (1,250—1,500 m a.s.l.), six sites in elevation range V (1,500—1,750 m a.s.1.) and two sites in elevation range
VI (> 1,750 ma.s.l.). A total of 442 bats were captured during 95 sampling nights, comprising 25 species, 16 genera and
six families. Out of the 25 species, Mvonycteris angolensis was the most abundant species captured with 80 individuals,
followed by Micropteropus pusillus (61 individuals) and Eidolon helvum (60 individuals). Moreover, species richness
peaked at the mid-elevation range III (1,000—1,250 m a.s.l.), with 13 species, with richness decreasing both at higher and
lower elevations. Elevation range I had the second highest species richness with 12 species, while elevational range VI
had the least species riches with three species. Species abundance peaked at elevation range IV (750-1,250 m a.s.1.) and
decreases at higher elevations. The sample efficiency was estimated as 72.8% and a species accumulation curve of bats
did not reach an asymptote, indicating that our sampling was incomplete. Our data showed that species richness and ab-
undance is affected by elevation, with species richness probably depending on habitat types and availability of resources
such as food and suitable roost sites. Our data also contributes to a better description of the local fauna and fills gaps on
the species distribution for high altitude sites.
Key words. Bat, elevation range, diversity, West region, Cameroon, altitudinal gradient.
INTRODUCTION
The western region of Cameroon is characterized by a het-
erogeneous landscape, of series of high plateaus formed
by volcanic massifs, the most important of which are
the Bamboutos Mountains (2,740 m a.s.l.), interspersed
among lowland areas such as the Nkam and Noun valleys,
and the Tikar Plain (Temgoua 2011). This heterogeneous
landscape composed of montane forest remnants, grass-
land savannah and gallery forest in valleys is part of the
Mount Cameroon-Bioko ecoregion. This region harbors
some of the most threatened ecosystems in the country
(Temgoua 2011). Indeed, very little of the region’s native
biota remained, a consequence of decades of deforesta-
tion to make way for agriculture and urbanization. More-
over, the region harbors the highest population density
of the country with 13% of the national population, con-
centrated in only 3% of the territory (MINEPAT 2010).
The consequences of these strong anthropic pressures are
Received: 23.02.2019
Accepted: 20.01.2020
particularly evident on the Western High Plateau, where
poor soil and low rainfall have aggravated the effects of
deforestation, converting the area to grassland (Temgoua
2011). As pointed out by Estrada & Coates-Estrada
(2002), human-induced land use changes, due to agricul-
ture and urbanization are known to alter bat assemblages,
depending on the functional identity of bat species.
Bats are a species-rich group of mammals with about
357 species recorded in Africa (ACR 2018). They are
found in every biome throughout the African continent
with the exception of some extremely hot regions, and
the tops of high mountains (Happold & Happold 2013).
Several authors suggest that species richness and distri-
bution of bats is influenced by the availability of resourc-
es such as drinking sites, food and suitable roost (Curran
et al. 2012; Happold & Happold 2013). The potential
distribution of each bat species can be affected by these
ecological variables. In the tropics, vegetation types cor-
related with altitude are the principal factors that deter-
Corresponding editor: J. Decher
Published: 20.02.2020
46 Ervis Manfothang Dongmo et al.
mine bat species distribution (Kanuch & Kristin 2006;
Weier et al. 2016). Mammalian species show varied
responses to altitudinal gradient, among which two pat-
terns standout for bats: a clinal pattern in which species
richness is higher in lower elevations and decreases with
altitude (Graham 1983, 1990; Patterson et al. 1996; Pin-
ares 2006; Flores-Saldana 2008; Peters et al. 2016; Peters
et al. 2019), or modal pattern with a peak in richness at
mid-altitudes (Sanchez-Cordero 2001; McCain 2005). In
addition, Curran et al. (2012), recorded some bat species
mainly at higher altitudes, mid-altitudes and others pre-
ferred both low and high altitudes. They further pointed
out that bat activity and capture rates in the tropics are
greater at lower altitudes because water is not a limiting
factor.
Although many surveys have focused on the mamma-
lian fauna of Cameroon, few of these studies concerned
bats until recently. To the best of our knowledge none
of these studies assessed how bat species richness var-
ies with altitude in heterogeneous landscapes such as the
West region of Cameroon. Moreover, bats are not includ-
ed in conservation and wildlife management programs
in tropical ecosystems despite their ecological and eco-
nomic importance (Bakwo Fils 2009, 2010). This lack of
ecological information about the bats fauna of Cameroon
hinders any development and implementation of conser-
vation strategies (Bakwo Fils 2010).
In the western region of Cameroon elevations reach as
high as 2,000 m a.s.l. in some areas such as the Bambou-
tos and dip as low as 500 m a.s.l. in others such as the
Noun and Nkam valleys. To our knowledge, bat diver-
sity along an altitudinal gradient in the region has never
been studied. This study provides novel data for the West
region of Cameroon, a region poorly surveyed for bats.
Furthermore, knowledge of species-landscape relation-
ship and species distribution is essential for proper plan-
ning and efficient management of biodiversity (Jaberg &
Guisan 2001).
The present study aims to investigate patterns of dis-
tribution of bat species, species richness and abundance
along an elevational gradient in the western region of
Cameroon. We hypothesize that altitudinal pattern of bat
assemblages in the region would vary with altitude and
habitat heterogeneity, and that abundance and species
richness would decrease with increasing elevation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study site
This study was conducted in the western region of Cam-
eroon. The region 1s situated between 5° and 6° N and
10° and 11°30’ E. The region covers a total surface area
of 13.892 km? (Olivry 1975; Brenac 1988). The vegeta-
tion is principally woodland savannah of the Sahel type,
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 45-54
interspersed among open dry forest. Very little of the
natural vegetation still exists because deforestation has
turned most of the area into grassland (Temgoua 2011).
The climate of the western region of Cameroon ts of the
Equatorial, Guinean type characterized by two major
seasons: a rainy season from mid-March to November
with peak precipitation in August and a dry season from
December to April. The annual rainfall varies between
1,000 mm and 2,000 mm depending on the year (Riviere
2000). The average annual temperature varies between
21.3°C and 29°C (Brenac 1988).
Bats capture and identification
The survey was conducted from December 2016 to
November 2018 at different altitudinal ranges (Fig. 1).
Sampling was conducted over 95 nights across 32 sites.
Bat activity was investigated in six different elevational
ranges that represent a mosaic of different landscapes of
the West region of Cameroon as described by Temgoua
(2011), notably mountainous relief, plateaus and plains:
Mbo plain (< 750 m as.l.), Tika plain (750-1,000 m
a.s.1.), Noun plain (1 ,000—1,250 m a.s.1.), Bamoun plateau
(1,250—1,500 maz.s.l.), Bamileke plateau (1,500—1,750 m
a.s.1.) and the isolated volcanic massif (> 1,750 maz.s.1.).
During each sampling night, mist nets (12 m x 2.5 m;
mesh, 40 mm) were deployed at particular sites based
on prior knowledge of bat activity (over slow-flowing
streams, cultivated farms, clearings, cave openings and
tree hollows). Mist nets were deployed at each site be-
tween 6 pm to 12 midnight and checked every 15 min.
For each bat captured, morphometric measurements
were taken using a Vernier caliper (Ecotone-Poland
150/0.1 mm), weight was recorded using a Pesola spring
balance (Ecotone-Poland Light Line 200g/0.2), the sex,
reproductive conditions and age class were also noted.
Morphological measurements from each captured bat
were used for the identification of each species using the
keys in Rosevear (1965), Hayman and Hill (1971), Pater-
son and Webala (2012) and Happold & Happold (2013).
Bats were released after identification and species that
could not be identified in the field were kept as voucher,
and preserved in 70% alcohol and deposited at the Lab-
oratory of Biological Sciences of the University of Ma-
roua-Cameroon. The geographical positions of each site
sampled were recorded using a hand-held GPS (Garmin
eTrex).
Data Analysis
In order to test the relationship between abundance and
species richness, the Generalized Linear Mixed-effects
Modes (GLMMS) was used to discern the potential
effects of some altitudinal variables. We performed a
Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA followed by HSD tests (at 95
% family-wise confidence level) in order to determine
©ZFMK
Diversity of bats along an altitudinal gradient in the western region of Cameroon 47
Bae SR ee
eh , 2
gy =e @
‘ Niin : ~
Legend
@ Sampling sites
Sub divisions
Altitude Range (m)
1) 230-750
760-1000
HN 1100-1300
HN 1400-1500
HH 1600-1800
HM 1900-2700
Fig. 1. Map of Cameroon showing the West Region, and sites sampled for bats from November 2016 to November 2018.
if species richness, abundance, diversity and equitability
differed among elevation ranges. The software Estimate
S 9.0 (Colwell 2013) was used to calculate the number of
species (X) using the averages of Chao | (mean), ACE
(mean), Jack 1 (mean) and Bootstrap (mean) and to gen-
erate a species accumulation curve. The sampling effi-
ciency was calculated based on the formula below:
Observed number of species
Sampling efficiency = —————___——_———.__ x 100
estimated number of species
Cluster analysis was performed for all altitudinal rang-
es to test the degree of similarity between them and to
test if bat communities represent different assemblages.
The Sorensen index (Sorensen 1948), was calculated
and used in cluster analysis following the UPGMA (Un-
weighted Pair-Group) method using the arithmetic aver-
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 45-54
age (Magurran & McGill 2011). Sorensen/Bray-Curtis
similarity dendrogram was then plotted using packages
of R software version 3.4.1 (R Core Team 2017).
RESULTS
Species richness and sampling success
During 95 sampling nights, we recorded a total of 442
bats, comprising 25 species, 16 genera and six families.
The family Pteropodidae had 7 species, followed by Hip-
posideridae with 6 species, Vespertilionidae with 5, Rhi-
nolophidae with 4, Molossidae with 2, and Nycteridae
with 1 species (Table 1). The species with the highest
capture frequency in the region was Myonycteris ango-
lensis (Bocage, 1898) (18.1% of all captures), followed
©ZFMK
48 Ervis Manfothang Dongmo et al.
Table 1. Individuals per species captured along an elevational gradient in the West region of Cameroon sampled from December
2 esto-NGvember DBs. a
Taxon Rangel Range Il Range III Range IV Range V Range VI Total
<750m 750-1,000m 1,000-1,250m = 1,250-1,500m_ = 1,500—-1,750m >1,750m
Pteropodidae
Micropteropus pusillus 2 18 20 12 it l 60
Eidolon helvum 1 1 18 4] 0) 0) 61
Myonycteris torquata 0 l 2 6 2 0 1]
Myonycteris angolensis 0 0 8 42 30 0 80
Rousettus aegyptiacus 13 0 1 0 0 0 14
Hypsignathus monstrosus 0 0 l 0 0 0 l
Epomops franqueti 0 1 0 0 0 0 l
Vespertilionidae
Pipistrellus nanulus 0 0 0 0 0 l l
Pipistrellus grandidieri 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
Neoromicia nana 1 0) 2 0) 4 0) 7
Scotoecus hirundo 1 0 0) 0) 0) 0) 1
Neoromicia tenuipinnis 0) 0) 4 0 0 0 4
Hipposideridae
Hipposideros abae 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Hipposideros beatus 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
Doryrhina cyclops 11 0 3 0 0 0 14
Hipposideros ruber 15 26 0 0 0 0 4]
Hipposideros caffer 0 1 0 0 0 l
Hipposideros fuliginosus 25 0 4 0 0 0 29
Molossidae
Chaerephon pumilus 0 0) 29 0) 4 0 33
Mops nanulus 0 0 15 0 0 0 15
Rhinolophidae
Rhinolophus landeri 0) 28 0) 8 0) 1 37
Rhinolophus clivosus 0 l 0 0 0 0 l
Rhinilophus simulator 0 22 0 0 0 0 22
Rhinolophus alcyone 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
Nycteridae
Nycteris arge 0 1 0) 0) 0 0 1
Species abundance 76 99 108 109 47 3 442
Species diversity 12 9 13 5 5 3 25
Shannon diversity( H’) 2.8 ple 3.0 1.9 17 1.6 a7
by Eidolon helvum (Kerr, 1792) (13.8%) and Microptero-
pus pusillus (Peters, 1868) (13.6%) (Table 1).
Species richness was highest in elevational range II
(1,000-1,250 m a.s.l.) (13 species) and its bat fauna was
represented by Pteropodidae, Vespertilionidae, Hippo-
sideridae and Molossidae (Table 1). Chaerephon pumi-
lus (Cretzschmar, 1826) (n = 29), was the most abundant
species captured at this elevational range, followed by
Micropteropus pusillus (n = 20) and Mops (Xiphonyct-
eris) nanulus J. A. Allen, 1917 (n = 15). In elevation
range I (<< 750 m as.l.), we recorded a total of 12 spe-
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 45-54
cles, represented by Pteropodidae, Vespertilionidae,
Hipposideridae and Rhinolophidae. Hipposideros fulig-
inosus (Temminck, 1853) was the most abundant (n =
25), followed by Hipposideros ruber (Noack, 1893) (n=
15) and then Rousettus aegyptiacus (E. Geoffroy, 1810)
(n = 13). In elevational range II (750—1,000 m a.s.1.), we
recorded 9 species, belonging to Pteropodidae, Hippo-
sideridae, Rhinolophidae and Nycteridae. Rhinolophus
landeri Martin, 1838 was the most frequently captured
bat (n = 28), followed by Hipposideros ruber (n = 26)
and then Rhinolophus simulator K. Andersen, 1904 (n=
©ZFMK
Diversity of bats along an altitudinal gradient in the western region of Cameroon 49
22). At elevational range IV (1,250—1,500 m) we record-
ed 5 species, represented by the families Pteropodidae
and Rhinolophidae. Elevation range VI (> 1,750 maz.s.1.)
was the least diverse, with 3 species (Pipistrellus nan-
ulus, Rhinolophus landeri and Micropteropus pusillus).
There was considerable difference in species diversity
and abundance across the different elevational ranges
(Table 1; Fig. 2).
@ Species richness
120
100
80
60
40
20
Range | Range Il
Range Ill
Species similarity along the elevational gradient
The Sorensen/Bray Curtis similarity test revealed that the
bat community structure of the six different elevational
ranges were similar (r-value = 0.8395) (Fig. 4). Range
I (< 750 m) and range II (750—1,000 m) form a simi-
lar cluster, and range III (1,000—1250 m) and range IV
(1,250—1,500 m) also form a similar cluster, indicating
O Species abundance
Range IV Range V Range VI
Fig. 2. Species diversity and abundance recorded at each elevational range in the West Region of Cameroon from November 2016
to November 2018.
Species richness and diversity along the elevational
gradient
Estimated species richness using Chao 1 (mean), ACE
(mean), Jack 1 (mean) and Bootstrap (mean) is 31.9;
38.5; 36.7; and 30.2 species respectively. The average
(x) of these four estimators is 34.3 species. The species
accumulation curve in the study area did not reach an
asymptote (Fig. 3), indicating that our sampling was in-
complete. The sample efficiency was 72.8 %, which in-
dicates that additional survey work is needed. The results
of the non-parametric one-way Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA
showed that mean species abundance of the six altitu-
dinal ranges did not differ statistically significantly at p
< 0.05 level (x?= 2.8651, df= 5, P= 0.7208). There was
also no statistically significant difference in species rich-
ness between elevational ranges (x? = 0.38798, df = 3,
p = 0.9427).
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 45—54
similarity in bat community structure. The dendrogram
also indicates that bat community structure of elevational
range V (1,500—1,750 m a.s.l.) and elevational range IV
was quite different from the cluster formed by range I (<
750 m) and range I (750—1,000 m) and that formed by
range III (1,000—1250 m) and range IV (1,250—1,500 m)
(Fig. 4).
Altitudinal species richness and abundance relation-
ship
The results of the Generalized Linear Mixed-effects
Modes (GLMMS) showed that there is variation in bat
species richness and abundance along the altitudinal gra-
dient. There 1s also a negative relationship between bat
species richness and altitude. Indeed, it summarizes the
output of the binary logistic model used to discern the po-
tential effects of some altitudinal range on the observed
©ZFMK
50 Ervis Manfothang Dongmo et al.
Number of bats
0 100
—— S(est)
Estimated species
200
Number of iadiveate
S(est) 95% Cl Lower Bound
400
500
— — S(est) 95% Cl Upper Bound
Fig. 3. Species accumulation curve of bats captured in the West Region of Cameroon from November 2016 to November 2018.
Horizontal line (34.3) = average of four species richness estimators.
Similarity Coeffident (Dice)
[= = a
Range VI
Range V
Range IV
Range III
Range II
Range |
Fig. 4. Sorensen/Bray — Curtis similarity test Dendrogram for
altitudinal ranges of bats captured in the West region of Camer-
oon from November 2016 to November 2018.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 45-54
total species richness. The model showed no statistically
significant difference in species richness at p < 0.05 lev-
el among the six elevational ranges (estimate = 0.757 +
0.357, t= 2.118, p= 0.0341). The smallest t-value found
between the elevational ranges I and III, showed no sta-
tistically significant difference in species composition.
The t-values of comparisons of the species composition
between the groups, IV, V and VI showed the highest dif-
ference.
Abundance was positively correlated with elevation-
al ranges I, IV and VI respectively (estimate = 1.216 +
0.195, z = 6.227, P < 0.001), (estimate = 0.824 + 0.360,
Zz = 2.290, P = 0.02200) and (estimate = -1.620 + 0.701,
Z = -2.309, p = 0.02092). However, the elevational range
III and V respectively (estimate = -0.17492, z = -1.084,
p = 0.27815), (estimate = -0.39744, z= -0.992, p =
0.32107) were negatively correlated with altitude.
DISCUSSION
Our data show that bat species richness in the western
region of Cameroon shows a low-plateau with a mid-el-
evational peak at elevational range IH (1,000—1,250 m
a.s.l.), after which species richness declines (Table 1).
A low-plateau with a mid-elevational peak was also ob-
served for bats at Mount Mulanje, Malawi (Curran et al.
©ZFMK
Diversity of bats along an altitudinal gradient in the western region of Cameroon 51
2012). A number of hypotheses have been proposed to
explain the decrease in species richness with altitude
among which the most frequently cited explanations in-
clude the mid-domain effect (MDE) (Rahbek 1997) and
environmental factors such as climatic variables, pro-
ductivity and habitat heterogeneity (Nogués-Bravo et al.
2008; Sanders & Rahbek 2012). Indeed, Peters et al.
(2016) stressed the importance of temperature as the
main predictor of species diversity in both plant and ani-
mal communities. Furthermore, Peters et al. (2019) spec-
ified that variation in species diversity in tropical moun-
tains is mostly driven by the interaction of both climate
and human land use changes. The MDE on the other hand
suggest that if species ranges are randomly shuffled with-
in a bounded geographical domain free of environmental
gradients, ranges overlap increasingly toward the center
of the domain, creating a “mid-domain” peak of species
richness (Colwell & Hurtt 1994; Colwell & Lees 2000).
According to McCain (2009) water availability is higher
at lower elevations. More open water leads to an increase
in activity of insects and subsequently to an increase in
activity of insectivorous bats (Korine & Pinshow 2004).
Furthermore, MacArthur & MacArthur (1961) argued
that lower elevations may also possess greater structur-
al complexity in vegetation that provide more resources
and hence support a larger number of species. However,
differences in species richness pattern observed along
the elevational gradient may also be explained by the in-
teraction between climatic factors, vegetation structure
and anthropic land use. Also, more species were captured
at lower and intermediate elevations than at the highest
elevation, this can be partly explained by the fact that
relatively fewer sites were sampled at higher elevations.
Twenty-five bat species were recorded at different el-
evational ranges. Myonycteris angolensis was the most
abundant bat captured. This forest species 1s common
in Cameroon, and was previously recorded in Buea
(Matschie 1891), Bibundi, Bonge, Ndiang, (Sj6stedt
1897a, b), Bimbia, Tombel (Eisentraut 1941), Eseka
(Haiduk et al. 1981), Ngaoundere (Muller et al. 1981),
Dja Reserve (Bakwo Fils 2009), and Mpem and Djim
National Park (Atagana et al. 2018). The abundance of
this species at mid-elevations may be due to the existence
of numerous natural and manmade structures that pro-
vide day roosts. Meredith Happold pointed out that Myo-
nycteris angolensis is apparently common in some local-
ized areas where fruiting trees and caves or cave-like day
roosts are present (Happold 2013a — as Lissonycteris an-
golensis). Indeed, ACR (2018) established that Myonyct-
eris angolensis is widely distributed at elevations ranging
from sea level to 4000 m a.s.l. in Africa. Micropteropus
pusillus was recorded in all ranges and its distribution
in not homogeneous across the elevation gradient. Ac-
cording to Atagana et al.(2018), Micropteropus pusillus
is widespread in Cameroon, and inhabits forest, savan-
nah, plantation and ecotone areas. Eisentraut (1973)
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 45—54
also recorded Micropteropus pusillus at elevations up to
1,800 m at Mount Manengouba. Eidolon helvum, Rouset-
tus aegyptiacus and Myonycteris torquata were recorded
at low and mid-elevations. Eidolon helvum was recorded
at elevations between 750 m and 1,500 m. Curran et al.
(2012) on Mount Mulanje in Malawi recorded E. hel-
vum only at mid-elevation (1,220-1,320 m). Indeed,
this species also preferred disturbed habitats and forms
large colonies around human habitations. Rousettus ae-
gyptiacus was only recorded at elevation below 1,250 m
and was conspicuously absent at higher altitudes. This
result contrast with that obtained in West Africa by Ver-
schuren (1976) and Denys et al. (2013) who reveal the
abundance of Rousettus aegyptiacus at high elevations.
Kwiecinski & Griffiths (1999) showed that the abun-
dance of Rousettus aegyptiacus at high elevation may be
due to the existence of numerous caves that provide day
roost. In Cameroon, this forest species was previously re-
corded in both primary and secondary forest by Sanborn
(1936), Sanderson (1940), Maisel et al. (2001), Bakwo
Fils (2009) and Atagana et al. (2018). Epomops franqueti
(Tomes, 1860) was recorded at mid-altitudes. These find-
ings are similar to those obtained by Eisentraut (1973)
who recorded Epomops franqueti at an altitude below
1,000 m on Mount Cameroon. Our study recorded only
a single individual of Hypsignathus monstrosus H. Allen,
1861 at mid-altitudes. According to Bergmans (1989),
Hypsignathus monstrosus 1s common in the rainforest,
and its abundance is determined by the availability of
ripe fruits. This species inhabits areas below 1,800 m and
was not recorded beyond this elevation (Happold 2013b).
This study revealed that vespertilionids were record-
ed in all altitudinal ranges. Pipistrellus nanulus Thomas,
1904 and Neoromicia tenuipinnis (Peters, 1872) were re-
corded at high and mid-altitudes respectively. Pipistrel-
lus cf. grandidieri (Dobson, 1876) and Scotoecus hirun-
do (de Winton, 1899) were recorded at low altitudes.
However, Neoromicia nana was recorded at both low
and mid-altitudes. According to Soriano (2000), some
species of vespertilionids may be better adapted to higher
altitudes with colder climate despite their size. Bat spe-
cies of the family Molossidae were captured at mid-alti-
tudes around man-made structures that provide day roost.
These findings corroborate those of McWilliam (1989)
and Esbérard (2003) who suggested that there is a high
probability of sampling molossids in front of their exit or
near possible roosts in roof linings of human residences.
Bats of the family Hipposideridae, Rhinolophidae and
Nycteridae have a higher richness and abundance in both
low and mid-altitudes. Our result is consistent with the
findings of Curran et al.(2012) who previously captured
a higher amount of bat species of the families Hipposide-
ridae, Rhinolophidae and Nycteridae between 630 and
1,030 m altitude on Mount Mulanje in Malawi. Rosevear
(1965), Schober & Grimmberger (1997), Georgiakakis
(2010) and Happold & Happold (2013) suggested that
©ZFMK
52 Ervis Manfothang Dongmo et al.
the distribution of some species like Hipposideros ruber,
H. fuliginosus, Rhinolophus landeri and R. simulator are
most consistently associated with day roosts and food
availability. Our data reveals the presence of a single
individual of Rhinolophus landeri Martin, 1838 at high
altitude in a cultivated area. At Mount Cameroon, Rose-
vear (1965) recorded R. /anderi in montane vegetation at
1,400 m, while Largen et al. (1974) captured it in Ethio-
pia from 515 to 1,800 m and found no marked altitudinal
preference. We recorded only a single individual each of
Hipposideros abae J. A. Allen, 1917, H. caffer (Sunde-
vall, 1846), Rhinolophus clivosus Cretzschmar, 1828,
and Nycteris arge Thomas, 1903 in our study, probably
indicating the rarity of these species.
This study has allowed us to obtain data on the distri-
bution of bat species with respect to the landscape of the
western region of Cameroon. However, we observed that
insectivorous bats are more diversified (18 species) but
less abundant (214 individuals) compared to frugivorous
bats that are less diverse (seven species), but more abun-
dant (228 individuals). This may be related to a bias in the
capture method that involved the use of understory mist
nets that are known to be efficient at capturing sub-can-
opy frugivorous bats (Fleming 1982). Additionally, it is
well established that mist nets have good success only
in Open environments (streams, cultivated farms, clear-
ings) (Martins et al. 2015). As pointed out by Kaftuch &
KriStin (2006), Rhinolophidae, Hipposideridae and some
Vespertilionidae can easily avoid mist nets because of
their efficient echolocation calls. Therefore, for more
exhaustive studies we recommend the use of harp traps,
echolocation recording and canopy netting to supple-
ment standard mist-netting. Our sampling efficiency was
estimated as 72.8%, confirming that additional surveys
might significantly improve our chances of recording
species new to the area. The similarity found between
the elevational ranges IV and V, and between elevation
ranges III and IV, V, is probably be related to the higher
turnover of bat species between these elevations (Mar-
tins et al. 2015). According to Lomolino (2001), biotic
turnover varies along the elevation gradient and depends
directly on the richness of the overlapping community.
In conclusion, our study provides baseline data on the
altitudinal ranges of bats in the western region of Camer-
oon. Species richness and abundance was higher at low
and mid-elevations but lower at higher altitudes. This
pattern of diversity is probably driven by differences in
ecological heterogeneity among the different elevational
ranges that provide suitable habitats for a number of spe-
cies. However, further research may be required to eval-
uate the impact of different habitats types on populations
of bat species in the western region of Cameroon.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. We express our appreciation to
IDEA WILD for providing field material. Our grateful thanks
goes to the lecturers of the Department of Animal Biology Uni-
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 45-54
versity of Maroua for their constructive criticisms and sugges-
tions during field work. The research permit was granted by
Cameroon Ministry of Scientific Research and Innovation (Ref:
0000011 /MINRESI /BO00 /C00/C10/C 14).
REFERENCES
Aellen V (1952) Contribution a l’Etude des Chiroptéres du
Cameroun. Mémoires de la Société Neuchateloise de Scienc-
es Naturelles 8 (1): 1-121
African Chiroptera Report (2018) African Bats NPC. Pretoria.
i-xvi1, 1-8028 accessed on December 28, 2009
Atagana PJ, Bakwo Fils EM, Mbeng DW, Tsague KJA, Kekeu-
nou S (2018) The bat fauna of the Mpem and Djim National
Park, Cameroon (Mammalia Chiroptera). Biodiversity Jour-
nal 9: 241-254
Bakwo Fils EM, Bol A Anong D, Badoana TD, Guieké B, Tsa-
la DE, Kuate FA (2014) Diversity of bats of the Far North
Region of Cameroon—with two first records for the country.
Biodiversity 15 (1): 16—22
Bakwo Fils EM (2009) Inventaire des Chauves-souris de la
Réserve de Biosphere du Dja, Cameroun. Le Vespere 2 (1):
11-20
Bakwo Fils EM (2010) The Bats of Cameroon: Proving the
Benefits of Forgotten Fruit Bats. Bats 28 (2): 11-13
Bergmans W (1989) Taxonomy and biogeography of African
fruit bats (Mammalia, Megachiroptera). The genera Microp-
teropus Matschie, 1899, Epomops Gray, 1870, Hypsignathus
H. Allen, 1861, Nanonycteris Matschie, 1899 and Plerotes
Andersen, 1910. Beaufortia 39: 89-153
Brenac P (1988) Evolution de la végétation et du climat dans
l’Ouest-Cameroun entre 25 000 et 11 000 ans BP. Inst. fr.
Pondichéry, Trav. Sec. Sci. Tech. 75: 91-103
Colwell RK (2013) Estimate S, version 9; statistical estimation
of species richness and shared species from samples. User’s
guide and application. http://purl.oclc.org/estimates
Colwell RK, Hurtt GC (1994) Nonbiological gradients in spe-
cies richness and a spurious rapoport effect. The American
Naturalist 144: 570-595
Colwell RK, Lees DC (2000) The mid-domain effect: geomet-
ric constraints on the geography of species richness. Trends
in Ecology and Evolution 15: 70-76
Curran M, Kopp M, Beck J, Fahr J (2012) Species diversity of
bats along an altitudinal gradient on Mount Mulanje, south-
ern Malawi. Journal of Tropical Ecology 28: 243-253
Denys C, Kadjo B, Missoup AD, Monadjem A, Aniskine V
(2013) New records of bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) and
karyotypes from Guinean Mount Nimba (West Africa). Ita-
lian Journal of Zoology 80 (2): 279-290
Eisentraut M (1941) Beitrag zur Oekologie Kameruner Chirop-
teren. Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin
25 (2): 245-273
Eisentraut M (1973) Die Wirbeltierfauna von Fernando Poo
und Westkamerun unter besonderer Beriticksichtigung der
Bedeutung der pleistozanen Klimaschwankung fur die heu-
tige Faunenverbreitung. Bonner Zoologische Monographien
3: 1-428
Ellena Y, Maryanto I, Suryobroto B (2015) The fruit bats
(Megachiroptera, Pteropodidae) from Bawakaraeng moun-
tain, South Sulawesi. Borneo Science 36: 33-43
Esbérard CEL (2003) Diversidade de morcegos em area de
Mata Atlantica regenerada no sudeste do Brasil. Revista Bra-
sileira de Zoociéncias 5: 189-204
©ZFMK
Diversity of bats along an altitudinal gradient in the western region of Cameroon 53
Estrada A, Coates-Estrada R (2002) Bats in continuous forest,
forest fragments and in an agricultural mosaic habitat-is-
land at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Biological Conservation 103:
237-245
Fleming TH (1982) Foraging strategies of plant visiting bats.
Pp. 287-326 in: Kunz TH (ed.) Ecology of bats. New York
(NY): Plenum Press
Flores-Saldafia MG (2008) Estructura de las comunidades de
murciélagos en un gradiente ambiental en la Reserva de la
Biosfera y Tierra Comunitaria de Origen Pilon Lajas, Boliv-
ia. Mastozoologia Neotropical 15: 309-322
Georgiakakis P, Vasilakopoulos P, Mylonas M, Dusso D (2010)
Bat species richness and activity over an elevation gradient in
Mediterranean Shrublands of Crete. Hystrix, Italian Journal
of Mammalogy (n.s.) 21(1): 43-56
Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: pro-
cedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of
species richness. Ecology Letters 4: 379-391
Graham GL (1983) Changes in bat species diversity along an
elevational gradient up the Peruvian Andes. Journal of Mam-
malogy 64: 559-571
Graham GL (1990) Bats versus birds: comparisons among Pe-
ruvian Volant vertebrate faunas along an elevational gradient.
Journal of Biogeography 17: 657-668
Haiduk MW, Baker RJ, Robbins LW, Schlitter DA (1981)
Chromosomal evolution in African Megachiroptera: G-and
C-band assessment of the magnitude of change in similar
standard karyotypes. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics 29:
221-232
Happold, M (2013a) Lissonycteris angolensis Angolan Soft-
furred Bat. Pp. 263-265 in: Happold M & Happold DCD
(eds) Mammals of Africa Volume IV: Hedgehogs, shrews and
bats. Bloomsbury Publishing, London
Happold, M (2013b). Hypsignathus monstrosus Hammer-head-
ed Fruit Bat. Pp. 260-262 in: Happold M & Happold DCD
(eds) Mammals of Africa Volume IV: Hedgehogs, shrews and
bats. Bloomsbury Publishing, London
Hayman RW, Hill JE (1971) The Mammals of Africa: An iden-
tification manual. Part 2. Order Chiroptera. Smithsonian In-
stitution Press. Washington, D. C.
Jaberg C, Guisan A (2001) Modelling the distribution of bats in
relation to landscape structure in a temperate mountain envi-
ronment, Journal of Applied Ecology 38(6):1169-1181
Kanuch P, Kristin A (2006) Altitudinal distribution of bats in
the Polana Mts area (Central Slovakia). Biologia, Bratislava
61 (5): 605-610
Korine C, Pinshow B (2004) Guild structure, foraging space
use, and distribution in a community of insectivorous bats in
the Negev Desert. J. Zool., Lond. 262: 187-196
Kwiecinski G, Griffith’s TA (1999) Rousettus egyptiacus [sic].
Mammalian Species 611: 1-9
Largen MG, Kock D, Yalden DW (1974) Catalogue of the
mammals of Ethiopia. I. Chiroptera. Monitore Zoologico
Italiano (N.S.), Supplemento V. 16: 221-298
Lomolino MV (2001) Elevation gradients of species-density:
historical and prospective views. Global Ecology and Bioge-
ography 10: 3-13
MacArthur RH, MacArthur JW (1961) On bird species diver-
sity. Ecology 42: 594-598. https//doi.org/10.2307/1932254
Magurran AE, McGill BJ (2011) Biological Diversity: Fron-
tiers in Measurement and Assessment. Oxford University
Press Inc, New York, USA
Maisels F, Keming E, Kemei M, Toh C (2001) The extirpa-
tion of large mammals and implications for montane forest
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 45—54
conservation: The case of the Kilum-Ijim Forest, North-west
Province, Cameroon. Oryx 35: 322-331
Martins MA, de Carvalho WD, Dias D, Franca de SD, de Ol-
iveira MB (2015) Bat species richness (Mammalia, Chirop-
tera) along an elevational gradient in the Atlantic Forest of
Southeastern Brazil. Acta Chiropterologica 17 (2): 401-409
Matschie P (1891) Ueber einige Saugetiere von Kamerun und
dessen Hinterlande. Archiv fiir Naturgeschichte 57: 351-356
Mayara AM, William DDC, Daniela D, Débora DSF, Marcione
BDO, Adriano LP (2015) Bat Species Richness (Mammalia,
Chiroptera) Along an Elevational Gradient in the Atlantic
Forest of Southeastern Brazil. Acta Chiropterologica 17 (2):
401—409
McCain CM (2005) Elevational gradients in diversity of small
mammals. Ecology 86: 366-372
McCain CM (2007) could temperature and water availability
drive elevational species richness patterns? A global case
study for bats. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16: 1-13
McCain CM (2009) Global analysis of bird elevational diversi-
ty. Global Ecology and Biogeography 18: 346—360.
https//doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2008.00443.x
McWilliam AN (1989) Emergence behavior of the bat Zadari-
da (Chaerophon) pumila (Chiroptera: Molossidae) in Ghana,
West Africa. Journal of Zoology, London 219: 698-701.
MINEPAT (2010) Rapport Régional de Progrés des Objectifs
du Millénaire pour le Développement: Région de |’Ouest
Miller P, Nagel P, Flacke W (1981) Ecological side effects of
dieldrin application against tsetse flies in Adamaoua, Camer-
oon. Oecologia 50: 187-194
Nogués-Bravo D, Araujo MB, Romdal T, Rahbek C (2008)
Scale effects and human impact on the elevational species
richness gradients. Nature 453: 216-219
Olivry JC (1975) Régimes Hydrologiques en Pays Bamiléké
(Cameroun). These Présentée a |’ Université des Sciences et
Techniques du Languedoc pour obtenir le grade de Docteur
de Spécialité (Géologie Appliquée, mention Hydrologie) 3°"
Cycle
Patterson BD, Pacheco V, Solari S (1996) Distribution of bats
along an elevational gradient in the Andes of south-eastern
Peru. Journal of Zoology 240: 637-658
Patterson BD, Webala PW (2012) Keys to the East African
Bats. Fieldiana: Life and Earth Sciences (Museum of Natural
History)
Peters MK; Hemp A, Appelhans T, Behler C, Classen A, Ens-
slin A, Ferger S, Helbig-Bonitz M, Hemp C, Kindeketa WJ,
Mwangomo E, Ngereza C, Roder J, Rutten G, Schellenberger
Costa D, Zancolli G, Eardley CD, Eardley CD, Peters R, Ssy-
mank A, Kakengi VA, Zhang J, Bohning-Gaese K, Brandl R,
Kalko E, Kleyer M, Nauss T, Tschapka M, Fischer M, Stef-
fan-Dewenter I (2016) Predictors of elevational biodiversity
gradients change from single taxa to the multi-taxa commu-
nity level, Nature Communications 7.
https//do1.org/10.1038/ncomms13736
Peters MK, Hemp A, Appelhans T, Becker JN, Behler C,
Classen A, Detsch F, Ensslin A, Ferger SW, Frederiksen
SB.; Gebert F, Gerschlauer F, Giitlein A, Helbig-Bonitz M,
Hemp C, Kindeketa WJ, Kihnel A, Mayr AV, Mwangomo E,
Ngereza C, Njovu HK, Otte I, Pabst H, Renner M, Roder J,
Rutten G, Costa DS, Sierra-Cornejo N, Vollstadt MGR, Dulle
HI, Eardley CD, Howell KM, Keller A, Peters RS, Ssymank
A, Kakengi V, Zhang J, Bogner C, Bohning-Gaese K, Brandl
R, Hertel D, Huwe B, Kiese R, Kleyer M, Kuzyakov Y,
Nauss T, Schleuning M, Tschapka M, Fischer M, Steffan-De-
wenter I (2019) Climate-land-use interactions shape tropical
©ZFMK
54 Ervis Manfothang Dongmo et al.
mountain biodiversity and ecosystem functions. Nature 568
(7750): 88-92
Pinares SEV (2006) Analisis de distribucion altitudinal de
mamiferos pequefios en el Parque Nacional Yanachaga Che-
millén, Pasco, Peru. M.Sc. Tesis, Facultad de Ciencias Bio-
logicas, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima
R Core Team (2016) A language and environment for Statistical
Computing. R foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna,
Austria. ISBN3-900051-07-0
Rahbek C (1997) The relationship among area, elevation, and
elevational gradients: species richness of small mammals
in regional species richness in Neotropical birds. American
Naturalist 149: 875-902
Riviere Y (2000) Paysages et Agroforets en Pays Bamiléké
(Ouest-Cameroun) Mémoire de stage en «Gestion des Syste-
mes Agro-Sylvo-Pastoraux en Zones Tropicales». Université
de Dschang, Cameroun et Université de Paris-Val-de-Marne
Rosevear DR (1965) The Bats of West Africa, Trustees of the
British Museum (Natural History), London, 401 pp.
Sanborn CC (1936) Descriptions and records of African bats.
Field Museum of Natural History. Zoological series 20:
107-114
Sanchez-Cordero V (2001) Elation gradients of diversity for
rodents and bats in Oaxaca, Mexico. Global Ecology and
Biogeography 10: 63-76
Sanders NJ, Rahbek C (2012) The patterns and causes of el-
evational diversity gradients. Ecography 35: 13. https//doi.
org/10.1111/).1600-0587.2011.07338.x
Sanderson IT (1940) The mammals of the North Cameroons
Forest Area. Being the results of the Percy Sladen Expedition
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 45-54
to the Mamfe Division of the British Cameroons. Transac-
tions of the Zoological Society of London 24: 623-725
Schober W, Grimmberger E (1997) The Bats of Europe and
North America. T.F.H. Publications, Neptune
Sjostedt Y (1897a) Saugetiere aus Kamerun, West-Afrika. Bin-
ang Till Kungl. Svenska Vetenskap-Akademiens Handlingar
423: 1-50
Sjostedt Y (1897b) Die Séugethiere des nordwestlichen Kame-
rungebietes. Kungl. Svenska vetenskap-sakademiens handl-
ingar 10: 22 pp.
Sorenson T (1948) A method of establishing groups of equal
amplitudes in plant sociology based on similarity of species
content and its application to analyses of the vegetation on
Danish commons. Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Sel-
skab, Biologiske Skrifter 5: 1-34
Soriano PJ (2000) Functional structure of bat communities in
tropical rainforests and Andean cloud forests. Ecotropicos
13: 1-20
Temgoua LF (2011) Déterminants socio-économiques et
écologiques de la plantation d’arbres producteurs de bois
d’ceuvre et d’artisanat dans |’Ouest du Cameroun. These
de Doctorat en «Géographie tropicale», Université Michel
de Montaigne Bordeaux 3, Bordeaux, FranceVerschuren J
(1976) Les cheiropteres du Mont Nimba (Liberia). Mamma-
lia 40: 615-632
Weier SM, Valerie MGL, Gaigher I, Patrick JCW, Taylor PJ
(2016) Changes of bat species composition over altitudinal
gradients on northern and southern aspects of the Soutpans-
berg mountain range, South Africa. Mammalia 81: 49-60
©ZFMK
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55—83
2020 - Kerbis Peterhans J.C. et al.
https://do1.org/10.20363/BZB-2020.69.1.055
ISSN 2190-7307
http://www.zoologicalbulletin.de
Research article
urn:|sid:zoobank.org:pub: 1 FD4D09C-D160-4159-A50D-20B6FBC7D9E9
Four new species of the Hylomyscus anselli group
(Mammalia: Rodentia: Muridae)
from the Democratic Republic of Congo and Tanzania
Julian C. Kerbis Peterhans' *, Rainer Hutterer’, Jeffrey B. Doty’, Jean M. Malekani*, David C. Moyer’,
Jarmila Krasova‘, Josef Bryja’, Rebecca A. Banasiak’® & Terrence C. Demos?
‘College of Arts & Sciences, Roosevelt University, 430 S Michigan Ave, Chicago, IL USA 60605
1.3.8.9 Science and Education, Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 S Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605, USA
?Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, D-53113 Bonn, Germany
3U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Poxvirus and Rabies Branch, 1600 Clifton Rd. Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
‘Département de Biologie, Faculté des Sciences, Université de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
"> PO. Box 691, Iringa, Tanzania
6 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Ceské Budéjovice, Czech Republic
‘Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Brno, Czech Republic
’Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
* Corresponding author: Email: jkerbis@fieldmuseum.org
'urn:Isid:zoobank.org:author:3B4A 1 A6B-B0O1E-4FF8-ADF1-6CF1FE102D20
2urn:lsid:zoobank.org: author: 16023337-0832-4490-89A9-846AC3925DD8
3urn:Isid:zoobank.org:author:33 A FA407-C88F-4A 8C-B694-A F29E3F894D7
4urn:Isid:zoobank.org:author:B1445794-1COA-4861-8AED-1A8C3434BBD3
Surn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:D73C593 D-82B0-4587-8C70-52E3AA72B538
6urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author: 1 Fl FFB1 B-E594-404B-AE93-EB8D9B9BA 101
7urn:Isid:zoobank.org:author:63C1A788-1102-4CBC-A0D3-B2434097359D
Surn:Isid:zoobank.org:author:5 DD1017E-0692-4049-8420-C4705EB2B505
°urn:Isid:zoobank.org:author:90A9F9F 1-8113-4B5E-BOE2-DA0212D118E4
Abstract. As in many other small mammal groups from the Afrotropics, the number of species recognized within the ge-
nus Hylomyscus has increased considerably over the past dozen years. The last comprehensive review (2005) of the genus
recognized eight species. Since that time, nine additional species have been elevated from synonymy (n = 4) or described
as new (n = 5). Here we describe four additional new species supported by morphological and molecular evidence, all
collected by the late William Stanley. Two of the new taxa are sympatric and come from the poorly known left bank (di-
rection source to mouth) of the Congo River. One of these (Hy/omyscus pygmaeus sp. nov.) is easily recognized, as it is
tiny and significantly smaller than any known species of the genus; the second new species (Hylomyscus thornesmithae
sp. nov.) is also small, and syntopic with the first. The third new species (Hylomyscus stanleyi sp. nov.), from the SW
corner of Tanzania, is quite large and had been previously included within the hypodigm of Hylomyscus anselli following
its recognition from within the synonymy of Hy/omyscus denniae. The fourth species (Hylomyscus mpungamachagorum
sp. nov.) is from Mahale Mountains National Park, western Tanzania. Our study reveals a much higher species diversity of
the genus than previously known, providing insights into additional Afrotropical and Afromontane centers of endemism
that require further exploration.
Key words. Afrotropics, biodiversity, endemism, Murinae, molecular phylogeny, systematics, alpha-taxonomy, biogeo-
graphy.
INTRODUCTION
Members of the genus Hy/lomyscus (wood mice) are
widespread in the forests of sub-Saharan Africa, north of
the Zambezi River. They are small (15-35 g), with tails
longer than head and body and have skulls with a short
upper tooth row and narrow zygomatic plates. Their short
broad feet suggested to their describer that they were
Received: 17.09.2019
Accepted: 31.01.2020
more arboreal than their relatives in the genus Praomys
from which they were split (Thomas 1926). In 2005,
Musser and Carleton recognized eight species within the
genus: Hylomyscus aeta (Thomas, 1911); H. alleni (Wa-
terhouse, 1838): H. baeri Heim de Balsac & Aellen, 1965;
H. carillus (Thomas, 1904); H. denniae (Thomas, 1906);
H. grandis Eisentraut, 1969; H. parvus Brosset et al.
1965; and H. stella (Thomas, 1911). Within one year, this
Corresponding editor: J. Decher
Published: 28.02.2020
56 Julian C. Kerbis Peterhans et al.
total increased to 12 (Carleton et al. 2006) with the de-
scription of H. arcimontensis Carleton & Stanley, 2005;
and the elevation from synonymy of H. anselli (Bish-
op, 1979), H. vulcanorum (Lonnberg & Gyldenstolpe,
1925), and H. endorobae (Heller, 1910). Since that time,
one additional species has been elevated from synonymy
(H. simus Allen & Coolidge, 1930) and four have been
described as new: H. heinrichorum Carleton et al., 2015,
H. kerbispeterhansi Demos et al., 2014, H. pamfi Nicolas
et al., 2010 and H. walterverheyeni Nicolas et al., 2008,
bringing the total to 17. Carleton et al. (2006), using
phenetic characters, proposed six species groups within
the genus (‘H. aeta’, ‘H. alleni’, ‘H. anselli’ , ‘H. baerv’,
‘H. denniae’, and ‘H. parvus’ groups). Eight characters
were used to define the ‘H. ansel/li’ group, four of which
distinguished it from the ‘H. denniae’ group with which
it had been previously lumped: six mammae (instead of
eight), shorter rostrum, shorter incisive foramina and a
medium-sized subsquamosal foramen (compared to a
tiny or absent subsquamosal foramen). Two species of
the ‘H. anselli group (H. anselli and H. arcimontensis)
and three of the “H. denniae’ group (H. denniae, H. vul-
canorum and H. endorobae) were recognized at that time.
Today, the ‘H. denniae’ group is restricted to the mon-
tane highlands of the Albertine Rift and the Kenya High-
lands whereas the *‘H. ansel//i’ group 1s distributed from
the Kenya Highlands through the Eastern Arc and South-
ern Highlands of Tanzania (and northernmost Malawi),
into the gallery forests of northern Zambia and the high-
land plateau of Angola. The other four species groups are
confined to the tropical regions of the continent. Here we
redefine this geographic pattern by describing four new
species of the ‘H. anse/li’ group from a previously un-
documented area of the Congo Basin and two isolated
forests in western Tanzania.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Specimens, morphology, morphometrics, collecting
Specimens are from the Field Museum of Natural His-
tory, Chicago (FMNH), National Museum of Zambia,
Livingstone (NMZ) and British Museum Natural His-
tory, London (BMNH). Additional Zambian and Ango-
lan records use the initials from their collectors (RS, R
Sumbera) or country of origin (ANG, Angola) and are
deposited in the Faculty of Sciences, University of South
Bohemia (USB) in Ceské Budéjovice (carcasses) and in
the Institute of Vertebrate Biology (IVB) of the Czech
Academy of Sciences, Studenec (tissues and skulls), both
in the Czech Republic. Field measurements, in millime-
ters, include: Total Length (TL), Tail vertebrae (TV),
Hind foot length (HF), Ear length (EL), Weight (Wt, in
grams); subtraction of TV from TL provides the head-
and-body length (HB) unless measured separately in the
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55—83
field. All external measurements were taken from orig-
inal field data by respective collectors. Only two spec-
imens of H. heinrichorum have weight recorded (both
ANG). Length of hind foot includes the claw. Hind foot
measurements of Hylomyscus heinrichorum from Angola
and all Hylomyscus anselli from Zambia specified ‘su’
(sans unguinal). Accordingly, 1.0 mm was added to HF
for missing claw length measurements. We employed the
following 16 cranial measurements in millimeters (Car-
leton & Van der Straeten 1997): occipito-nasal length
(ONL), condyle-incisive length (CI), greatest zygomatic
breadth (ZB), breadth of the braincase measured across
the parietal flanges behind the zygomatic arches (BBC),
breadth across the occipital condyles (BOC), least inter-
orbital breadth (OB), length of nasals (LN), breadth of
the rostrum (BR), post-palatal length (PPL), length of the
bony palate (LBP), length of the incisive foramen (LIF),
length of upper diastema (LD), breadth of the zygomat-
ic plate (BZP), length of the auditory bulla, oblique to
tooth row (LAB), coronal (rather than alveolar) length
of the maxillary toothrow (CLM), and width of the first
upper molar (WM1). We define rostral length as length
of nasals divided by occipito-nasal length (LN/ONL). In
order to estimate relative age and ontogenetic growth,
we adopt dental wear stages from Verheyen & Bracke
(1966). Specimens were measured and weighed, and e1-
ther prepared as skins and skeletons or fixed in formalin
and later transferred to 70% ethanol, and deposited at
FMNH or USB. DRC refers to the Democratic Republic
of Congo and TZ refers to Tanzania. An aliquot of tissue
was taken from the specimen at the time of capture and
preserved in ETOH until it was transferred to cryogenic
storage at -180 °C at FMNH.
Principal components analysis (PCA) of 16 log-trans-
formed cranio-dental variables based on a variance-cova-
riance matrix was used to assess morphometric variation
and visualize the morphometric distinctiveness of named
and putative species for an eight species data set (159
specimens: H. anselli, H. arcimontensis, H. heinricho-
rum, H. kerbispeterhansi, H. sp. nov. 1 (pygmy Hylomy-
scus from DRC), H. sp. nov. 2 (small Hylomyscus from
DRC), H. sp. nov. 3 (Mbizi Hylomyscus from Tanzania),
H. sp. nov. 4 (Mahale Hylomyscus from Tanzania) and a
four species data set (136 specimens: H. arcimontensis,
H. kerbispeterhansi, H. sp. nov. 3 (Mbizi Hylomyscus
from Tanzania) and H. sp. nov. 4 (Mahale Hylomyscus
from Tanzania). Standard summary statistics were calcu-
lated from univariate measurements for 16 cranio-den-
tal and six external characters. All statistical analyses
were performed using the software PAST (Hammer et al.
2001).
Permission for the collection and export of specimens
was provided by the Republic of Tanzania and the Dem-
ocratic Republic of Congo. Approval for the import of
specimens into the USA was provided by the US Fish
and Wildlife Service. Relevant documents pertaining to
©ZFMK
Four new Hylomyscus (Muridae) from Africa 57
export and import are housed at FMNH under the follow-
ing Accession Numbers: Z-20745, Z-20738, Z-19855,
Z-19599. All euthanized specimens followed the proto-
col approved by the American Society of Mammalogists
(Sikes et al. 2011). The study was approved by the Field
Museum of Natural History Institutional Animal Care
and Use Committee (09-3).
DNA extraction, amplification, and sequencing
Whole genomic DNA was extracted from tissue samples
of H. aeta (n = 1, Uganda), H. stella (n = 1, Uganda),
H. heinrichorum (n = 4, Angola), H. sp. nov. 1 (pygmy
Hylomyscus from DRC, n = 1), H. sp. nov. 2 (small Hy-
lomyscus from DRC, n = 5), H. sp. nov. 3 (Mbizi Hy-
lomyscus from Tanzania, n = 5), H. sp. nov. 4 (Mahale
Hylomyscus from Tanzania, n = 3) using the QIAGEN
DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Germantown, MD). An
additional 34 Hylomyscus cytochrome-b (Cytb) sequenc-
es were downloaded from GenBank (Appendix 2). Mas-
tomys natalensis, a close relative of Hylomyscus (Step-
pan & Schenk 2017), was chosen as an outgroup using
a Cytb sequence downloaded from GenBank. In total,
sequence data was generated or downloaded from Gen-
Bank for 16 of 18 currently recognized species (Mam-
mal Diversity Database 2019) from all six Hylomyscus
Species groups. Frozen tissues and GenBank accessions
were unavailable for H. carillus (Angola). Specimens
were sequenced for Cytb using the primers L14723 and
H159125 (Lecompte et al. 2002). PCR amplification was
performed on 25 wL reactions using the following ther-
mal conditions: an initial denaturation step at 94 °C for
3 min, followed by 38 cycles consisting of 30 s at 94 °C,
30 s at 50 °C, and 1 min at 68 °C, followed by a final
extension step of 5 min at 68 °C. Amplified PCR prod-
ucts were purified using ExoSAP-IT (Thermo Scientific,
MA, USA). Sequencing was carried out in both direc-
tions on an ABI 3100 thermocycler (Applied Biosystems,
CA, USA) at the Pritzker Laboratory for Molecular Sys-
tematics and Evolution (FMNH). Chromatographs were
checked manually and assembled and edited using Ge-
neious 11.1.5 (Biomatters Ltd.). Sequences were aligned
for Cytb using MUSCLE Alignment within the Geneious
platform with default parameters. Sequence data from
Cytb were translated into amino acids and the alignment
was inspected for deletions, insertions, and premature
stop codons to exclude possible nuclear pseudogenes.
Molecular data and phylogenetic analyses
The best supported model of nucleotide substitution for
Cytb was determined using the BIC on the maximum
likelihood topology inferred in ;jMODELTEST2 v.2.1.6
(Darriba et al. 2012) on CIPRES Science Gateway v.3.3
(Miller et al. 2010). Interspecific uncorrected sequence
divergences (p-distances) were calculated in MEGA
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55—83
7.0.26 (Kumar et al. 2016). Maximum likelihood infer-
ence of a Cytb gene tree was made using the program
IQ-TREE v1.6.10 (Nguyen et al. 2015) on the CIPRES
portal. We conducted analyses using the best-scoring ML
tree search algorithm under the GTR+I+G model with
1,000 bootstrap replicates. Bayesian gene tree analyses
were carried out using MRBAYES v.3.2.6 (Ronquist
et al. 2012) on the CIPRES portal to infer a Cytb gene
tree. Two replicates were run to facilitate proper mixing.
Four Markov chains with default heating values were
conducted for 10,000,000 generations and sampled every
1,000th generation. Stationarity of the MCMC chain was
assessed using TRACER v.1.7.1 (Rambaut et al. 2018).
The first 2,500 samples were discarded as burn-in and the
remaining 7500 samples comprised the posterior proba-
bility (PP) distributions. A majority rule consensus tree
was generated from the analysis. All newly generated
sequences were deposited in GenBank with accession
numbers MN857618—MN857637 (Appendix 2). We use
these gene tree analyses to test the concordance of spe-
cies limits inferred using morphological data with clades
supported by genetic data, estimate support for mono-
phyly of recognized and putative species, and assess phy-
logenetic relationships among them.
RESULTS
The specimens from the Congo basin (DRC) were clearly
undescribed members of the H. anselli clade based on
their morphological characters: short feet, teat formula
(2+4 for Hylomyscus sp. nov., small Hylomyscus), short
incisive foramen, thin stapedial strap and medium-size
subsquamosal foramen. Their small size confirmed their
unique status within the H. anselli clade. Subsequent ge-
netic analyses were instrumental in revealing the exis-
tence of the two cryptic Tanzanian species.
Morphometrics
Two principal component analyses were performed on
16 log-transformed cranio-dental variables. The first in-
cluded all eight putative species of the H. anselli group
(Fig. 1); the second (Fig. 2) included those four species
found east of the Albertine Rift Valley (Fig. 3). In the
eight species PCA (Fig. 1), the small-sized Congo Ba-
sin taxa (H. sp. nov. 1, pygmy Hylomyscus from DRC
and H. sp. nov. 2 (small Hylomyscus from DRC) are dis-
tinguished from all other species in the H. anselli group
along the first axis and will not be discussed further. The
Angolan taxon (H. heinrichorum) is distinguished along
the second axis from the Zambian taxon (H. anselli).
In the four species PCA (Fig. 2), H. kerbispeterhan-
si and Hylomyscus sp. nov. 3 (Mbizi Hylomyscus from
Tanzania) are readily distinguished along the second
axis. Hylomyscus sp. nov. 3 (Mbizi Hylomyscus from
©ZFMK
58 Julian C. Kerbis Peterhans et al.
sp. nov. 2 (small
Hylomyscus from DRC)
sp. nov. 3 (Mbizi
Hylomyscus from
Tanzania) (*)
anselli (m)
sp. nov. 4 (Mahale Hylomyscus (@)
from Tanzania)
PC2 8.2%
¥ sp.nov. 1 (pygmy Hylomyscus
from DRC)
-0.7 -0.6 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3
kerbispeterhansi (CO)
heinrichorum (x)
-0.2 -0.1 6.0 0.1 0.2
PC1 68.1%
Fig. 1. Principle component analysis of cranial measurements of all eight members of the Hylomyscus anselli group.
Tanzania) has only modest overlap along the 1% and
2™ axes with H. arcimontensis, but H. kerbispeterhansi
and H. arcimontensis show overlap along both principle
components. Hylomyscus sp. nov. 4 (Mahale Hylomy-
scus from Tanzania) does overlap with H. arcimontensis
in PCA multivariate space (Fig. 2) but they are allopatric
and occupy different biogeographic regions: Hylomyscus
arcimontensis 1s confined to the Eastern Arc montane ar-
chipelago while Hylomyscus sp. nov. 4 (Mahale Hylomy-
scus from Tanzania) is known only from the Albertine
Rift; see Fig. 3).
In the eight species PCA, the first two principle com-
ponents accounted for 76% of the cumulative variance
(Table 1). The major contributing variables on PC1 were
all correlated with the length of the rostrum: length of in-
cisive foramen (LIF), length of nasals (LN) and length of
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55—83
diastema (LD). On PC2 the major contributing variables
were breadth of zygomatic plate (BZP), length of nasals
(LN), and length of bony palate (LBP). In the four spe-
cies PCA the first two principle components accounted
for 64% of the cumulative variance (Table 2). The major
contributing variables on PC1 were identical to PC1 on
the eight species PCA: length of diastema (LD), length
of incisive foramen (LIF) and length of nasals (LN). On
PC2, the most important variables were breadth of zy-
gomatic plate (BZP), length of bony palate (LBP) and
crown length of molars (CLM).
Genetic analyses
The mtDNA gene tree (Fig. 4) supports the monophy-
ly of the Hylomyscus anselli group minus H. sp. nov. 1
©ZFMK
Four new Hylomyscus (Muridae) from Africa 59
Table 1. PCA loadings from all eight members of the Hy/omy-
scus anselli group.
Variable Correlations
PCl PC2
ONL 0.240 0.106
CI 0.253 0.095
ZB 0.192 0.102
BBC 0.138 0.040
BOC 0.143 -0.096
IO O41 52 -0.094
LN 0.359 0.427
BR 0.209 0.183
PPL 0.212 0.089
LBP 0.208 0.359
LIF 0.381 -0.220
LD 0.302 0.196
BZP 0.281 -0.636
LAB 0.234 -0.015
CLM O.297 -0.208
WMI 0.267 -0.251
Cumulative % variance 68.1 76.3
Eigenvalue 0.0081 0.0010
(pygmy Hylomyscus from DRC; bootstrap [BS] = 99,
posterior probability [PP] = 1.0). The new species, Hy-
lomyscus sp. nov. 1 (pygmy Hylomyscus from DRC)
from the western Congo basin, is highly divergent from
other H. anselli group species (10.9-12.1% Cytb p-dis-
tance), and moderately well supported as sister to all
other H. anse/li group members (BS = 82, PP = 0.96).
The new species Hylomyscus sp. nov. 2 (small Hylomy-
scus from DRC), H. sp. nov. 3 (Mbizi Hylomyscus from
Tanzania) and H. sp. nov. 4 (Mahale Hylomyscus from
Tanzania) are well supported clades (bootstrap = 100,
posterior probability = 1.0). Carleton and Stanley (2005)
and Carleton et al. (2006, 2015) assigned specimens from
the Mbizi Mountains, Tanzania, to H. anselli based on
similar phenetics and geographical proximity. However,
our PCA (Fig. 1) shows little overlap between H. anselli
and H. sp. nov. 3 (Mbizi Hylomyscus from Tanzania), al-
though we had access to only four members of H. ansel-
li. Further, our newly available genetic data indicate
that this assignment was incorrect. The Mbizi Hylomy-
scus population is now assigned to distantly related H.
sp. nov. 3 (Mbizi Hylomyscus from Tanzania, Fig. 4), il-
lustrating how ‘cryptic’ these species are. H. anselli and
H. sp. nov. 3 (Mbizi Hylomyscus from Tanzania) are not
even sister; the genetic distance between them is 8.2% at
Cytb (Table 3). Hylomyscus sp. nov. 3 (Mbizi Hylomy-
scus from Tanzania) + H. sp. nov. 4 (Mahale Hylomyscus
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55—83
- Variable
Table 2. PCA loadings from four members of the Hylomyscus
anselli group found east of the Albertine Rift.
Correlations
PEA PE?
ONL 0.231 0.102
CI 0.267 -0.027
ZB 0.211 0.037
BBC 0.155 0.107
BOC 0.146 -0.006
IO 0.160 0.216
LN 0.314 0:3827
BR 0.278 -0.131
PPL 0.260 0.044
LBP 0.208 0.392
LIF 0325 -0.229
LD 0.340 -0.222
BZP 0.280 -0.546
LAB 0.298 -0.209
CLM 0.215 0.375
WMI 0.197 0.258
Cumulative % variance 52:6 64.3
Eigenvalue 0.0034 0.0008
from Tanzania) + H. kerbispeterhansi form a distinct and
highly supported East African clade (BS = 82, PP = 0.96)
distributed in montane habitats in Kenya and Tanzania.
These species exhibit allopatric distributions within the
H. anselli group, although H. kerbispeterhansi 1s sympat-
ric with H. endorobae (H. denniae group) on the Mau Es-
carpment in west-central Kenya (see Demos et al. 201 4a,
b; 2015). The relationship of H. arcimontensis from Tan-
zania 1s weakly supported (BS = 79, PP = 0.87) as sister
to the aforementioned three East African H. anselli group
species. Hylomyscus sp. nov. 2 (small Hylomyscus from
DRC), also from the western Congo Basin, is strongly
supported (BS = 92, PP = 1.0) as sister to the geograph-
ically distant and disjunct East African H. anselli group
clade. Hylomyscus anselli, now restricted to Zambia on
the basis of data from this study, is strongly supported
(BS = 100, PP = 1.0) as sister to H. heinrichorum from
Angola, and this clade (H. anselli + H. heinrichorum) is
strongly supported (BS = 99, PP= 1.0) as sister to a clade
that includes representatives of the H. ansel/li group from
both East Africa and the western Congo Basin.
New taxa
All four new species (Hy/omyscus sp. nov. 1, sp. nov. 2,
sp. nov. 3, sp. nov. 4) described here nest within the H.
anselli group. Of the characters suggested to define the H.
©ZFMK
60 Julian C. Kerbis Peterhans et al.
+
+
arcimontensis
<e
ay
PC2 11.7%
sp. nov. 4 (Mahale
Hylomyscus from Tanzania)
-0.20 0.16 -0.12 -0.08 -0.04
sp. nov. 3 (Mbizi
Hylomyscus from Tanzania)
0.00 0.04 0.08 012 0.16
PC1 52.6%
Fig. 2. Principle component analysis of cranial measurements of the four members of the Hy/omyscus anselli group found east of
the Albertine Rift.
anselli group (Carleton et al. 2006), the most reliable in-
clude abbreviated incisive foramina, the absence of pecto-
ral mammae (total mammae = 2+4) and the thin, elongate
hamular process providing for enlarged sub-squamosal
foramina (discussed and illustrated in Carleton & Stanley
2005: fig. 6). These characters distinguish the H. anselli
group from the H. denniae group, the only two groups
with montane representatives to the east and south of the
Congo Basin. All of the four new taxa described below
possess these three characters; however, in Hylomyscus
pygmaeus sp. nov. (pygmy Hylomyscus from DRC), teats
are not visible, as the specimen is young.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55—83
Hylomyscus pygmaeus sp. nov. Kerbis Peterhans, Hut-
terer & Demos
urn: lsid:zoobank.org:act: 1B7A9BDE-24A0-47DE-9B66-F3 B40DISEES4
Dendromus sp. — Doty et al. (2017)
Holotype. Field Museum of Natural History, Division
of Mammals number FMNH 219684 (field number WT
Stanley 11,575; CDC 207), collected by W.T. Stanley, 13
June 2012 (listed in field notes as Dendromus sp.) during
the first small mammal survey in the area. The specimen,
consisting of a study skin and skull with carcass in al-
cohol, is a young adult female with first upper molar in
early wear (stage IV of Verheyen & Bracke 1966). The
basisphenoid-occipital suture is unfused. External mea-
©ZFMK
Four new Hylomyscus (Muridae) from Africa 61
Table 3. Uncorrected cytochrome-b p-distances (%) within (bolded numbers on diagonal) and between Hylomyscus anselli group
species, calculated in MEGA 7.0.26 (Kumar et al. 2016).
Taxon 1 2 8) 4 5 6 7 8
1 anselli 1.1
2 arcimontensis 8.1 1:5
3 mpungamachagorum sp. nov. See 6.0 0.0
4 heinrichorum 44 Oo 8.4 0.3
5 kerbispeterhansi 8.1 6.6 4.7 8.0 0.0
6 stanleyi sp. nov. 8.2 6.3 49 93 a 0.0
7 thornesmithae sp. nov. 8.6 6.6 6.6 8.3 6.9 6.4 0.0
8 pygmaeus sp. Nov. ES LO 10.9 10.9 10.8 dS) | | na
= = = denniae group
denniae
endorobae
vulcanorum
anselli_group
anselli
arcimontensis
thoresmithae
heinrichorum
mpungamachagorum
pygmaeus
stanleyi
O
ea
4
+
*
LJ
*
a
r
A
e
kerbispeterhansi
Biege
ee. Ly "
0 125 250
Fig. 3. Map of the distributions of members of the Hylomyscus denniae and Hylomyscus anselli groups.
surements were made in the field: TL 132, TV 76, HF 14, — Type locality. Democratic Republic of Congo, Tshuapa
EL 12, Wt 5.8. Specimen caught in a pitfall trap (PF 4, Province, 4 km N of Boende, Baliko (0.24127 S, 20.8833
Bucket 10). E), right side Tshuapa River, elevation of 358 m.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55—83 ©ZFMK
62
97/1.0
95/1.0
100/1.0 | Tanzania Mahale FMNH177889
100/1.0
79/0.87
100/1.0
92/1.0
99/1.0
82/0.96
96/1.0
82/-
73/0.73
62/0.78 97/1.0
49/0.96 83/0.83
81/0.98
parvus Cameroon JQ735555
baeri Guinea JQ735509
aefa Uganda FMNH160492
10 100/1.0
grandis Cameroon JQ735513
39/.
92/1.0
denniae Uganda FMNH144526 KF876479
(— Mastomys natalensis JX292865
0.03
endorobae Kenya FMNH190467 KF810158
vuleanorum DRC FMNH203881 KF810176
Julian C. Kerbis Peterhans et al.
Kenya Cherangani FMNH217384 KF810206
Kenya Cherangani FMNH217385 KF810203
Kenya Cherangani FMNH217383 KF810205
Kenya Elgon FMNH217358 KF810200
Kenya Elgon FMNH217325 KF810239
Kenya Elgon FMNH217601 KF810240
Kenya Mau FMNH210000 KF810226
Kenya Mau FMNH210001 KF810231
Tanzania Mbizi FMNH171362
Tanzania Mbizi FMNH171363
100/1.0) Tanzania Mbizi FMNH171360
Tanzania Mbizi FMNH171352
Tanzania Mbizi FMNH171353
Tanzania Mahale FMNH177888
kerbispeterhansi
99/1.0
sp. nov. 3 (Mbizi Hylomyscus
from Tanzania)
sp. nov. 4 (Mahale
Tanzania Mahale FMNH177890 Hylomyscus from Tanzania)
Malawi Misuku FMNH196311 KF876469
Malawi Misuku FMNH196753 KF876468
Malawi Nyika FMNH211576 KF876476
Malawi Nyika FMNH211577 KF876477
Tanzania Usumbara FMNH147476 KF810191
Tanzania Usumbara FMNH150118 KF810192
Tanzania Usumbara FMNH150143 KF810193
DRC Tshuapa FMNH219611
DRC Tshuapa FMNH219612
DRC Tshuapa FMNH219613
DRC Tshuapa FMNH222524
DRC Tshuapa FMNH219689
Zambia RS1113 JX126613
Zambia RS1606 JX126616
Zambia RS1114 JX126614
Zambia RS1115 JX126615
r Zambia RS811 JX126618
Zambia RS818 JX126619
Zambia RS803 JX126621
Zambia RS810 JX126617
Zambia RS793 JX126620
Angola ANG0210
100/1.0 } Angola ANGO215
Angola ANGO0237
Angola ANGO259
DRC Tshuapa FMNH219684
pamfi Benin JQ735527
simus |vory Coast JQ735557
alleni Gabon AF518328
stella Uganda FMNH160511
walterverheyeni CAR JQ735614
arcimontensis
dnoi6 jasue
sp. nov. 2 (small
Hylomyscus from DRC)
seri anselli
heinrichorum
sp. nov. 1 (pygmy
Hylomyscus from DRC)
alleni group
parvus group
baeri group
} ——_____________» aeta group
|________» denniae group
Fig 4. Phylogenetic tree, using cytochrome-d, of the genus Hylomyscus with focus on the Hylomyscus anselli group. Bootstrap
values for maximum likelihood analysis followed by posterior probabilities for Bayesian analysis are indicated above branches.
Diagnosis. Easily recognized by its small size: HB 56,
Wt 5.8, CI 15.9, CLM 2.6, WM1 0.8. All are signifi-
cantly smaller than any other members of the H. ansel-
li group (Figs 5a, c, 6a, c, e; Tables 4-5), or, for that
matter, any member of Hylomyscus. Ears exceptionally
long (Fig. 5c), 23% of HB. Incisors slightly pro-odont
(Fig. 6e). Braincase inflated, round and bulbous (Figs 6a,
e). Rostrum extremely short (Fig. 6a, LN/ONL = 26.7%).
Comparisons. This species is by far the smallest mem-
ber of the Hylomyscus anselli group as reflected in Ta-
bles 4—5: e.g., crown length of upper molars 2.6, com-
pared to 3.0-4.5; HB 56, compared to 76—109 for other
members of the group.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55—83
Description. Size very small (HB 56, mass 5.8). Tail
36% longer than HB. Tail unicolor with 21—23 annula-
tions per cm. Ears long, 23% of HB, 13 mm re-measured
from dry study skin (vis a vis field notes = 12 mm). Bel-
ly hairs 3 mm, basal 50% slate grey, distal 50% slightly
ochraceous. Dorsal hairs 4 mm, basal 2.5 mm slate grey,
tipped with carmel brown. Dorsum of head appearing
more grey, due to shorter ochraceous tips (perhaps in
molt). Upper lip creamy white. Vibrissae ‘long’ — up to
25 mm in length —, ventral vibrissae white; dorsal vibris-
sae black and shorter. Young adult female with mammae
not visible on dry skin. The number of fleshy pads on the
hind foot are not determinable from the single study skin.
The number of fleshy palatal ridges are not visible in the
single cleaned skull.
©ZFMK
Four new Hylomyscus (Muridae) from Africa 63
Table 4. Craniodental measurements in millimeters (mean + 1 SD and range) for eight species in the Hy/omyscus anselli group.
Abbreviated variables are defined in the text.
Variable kerbispeterhansi stanleyi mpungamachagorum arcimontensis thornesmithae anselli heinrichorum pygmaeus
(n=51) (n= 22) (n= 4) (n= 53) (n=5) (n = 4) (n= 13) (n= 1)
ONL 26.36 + 0.75 27.16 + 0.56 25.25 + 0.08 23,09 0,695 2284-20-61" 25,0825 030" “2673S 0779 17.45
(24.68-27.96) (26.20—28.48) (25.17—25.36) (24.12-27.25) (22.09-23.39) (25.74-26.39) (25.52—28.12)
Cl 24.73 + 0.87 24.84 + 0.56 23.34 40.31 23.80+£0.70 21424047 23.9840.57 24.77+40.75 15.89
(22.66-26.53) (23.60—26.42) (22.95—23.70) (22.43—-25.61) (21.06-22.08) (23.28-24.68) (23.68-26.18)
ZB 13.19+0.42 B50 25 12 65202 12.85+045 11664010 12.84+40.22 12.99+0.38 9.68
(12.25-14.19) (12.86—13.95) (12.48-12.73) (11.91-13.89) (11.55-11.80) (12.53-13.05) (12.52—-13.70)
BBC 11.81 0.27 12.14+0.24 11.65 + 0.16 11.6640.34 11.07+049 11804039 11.81+0.22 O27
(11.25-12.51) (11.62-12.48) (11.51-11.83) (10.90-12.47) (10.64-11.62) (11.24-12.12) (11.55-12.29)
BOC 6.10+0.18 OAL O 12 SE Ou OnlZ 022 562-2017 6.18£0.18 6.26: 2042 4.94
(5.58-6.45) (5.93-6.32) (5.78-6.05) (5.55-6.54) — (5.42-5.81) (6.00-6.40) (6.06—6.43)
IO 4.35+0.10 460+ 0.12 4.52+0.21 4.36+0.15 3.89 + 0.08 4.41+0.16 4.53 + 0.08 3.74
(4.17-4.57) (4.46-4.91) (4.34-4.80) (4.09-4.66) (3.77-3.99) (4.20-4.57) (4.42-4.69)
LN 9.45 + 0.46 10.14 + 0.33 8.71 + 0.07 9192035 7,69 +£0.31 GAS 2027 9.16 + 0.49 4.66
(8.44-10.69) (9.26-10.61) (8.64-8.81) (8.44-9.76) = (7.32-7.97) (8.81—9.38) (8.06—9.94)
BR 4.56 + 0.27 4.55+0.14 4.43+0.11 4.45 + 0.20 4.11+0.20 4.59 + 0.07 4.35 + 0.24 3.23.
(4.16—5.60) (4.27-4.97) (4.27-4.50) (4.08-4.96) — (3.94-4.42) (4.48-4.63) (4.01-4.73)
BPE 9.03 + 0.44 9.36 + 0.27 8.98 + 0.24 8.96 + 0.31 8.62 + 0.33 9.11+0.24 9.40 + 0.44 6.28
(8.12-10.32) (8.75—10.05) (8.69-9.28) (8.37-9.63) (8.23-8.94) (8.87-9.45) — (8.58-10.20)
LBP 4.50+0.18 4.76+0.18 4.26 + 0.06 4.42+0.21 4.18+40.14 4.79 +£0.17 4.45 + 0.20 201
(3.92-4.81) (4.36—5.09) (4.19-4.34) (3.95-4.83) (4.00-4.37) (4.60-4.93) (4.08-4.77)
LIF S09 2025 5.48 + 0.16 5.09 £0,19 S38 O30 4.38 + 0.22 523022 5.84 + 0.27 2.83
(5.02-6.06) (5.29-5.78) (4.89-5.34) (4.78-6.11) (4.10-4.67) (5.09-5.55) (5.33-6.33)
LD L&LE O32 759 +£0.17 6.95 £0.19 FIDO 25 6.55: 4+:0.29 TAGEOAD 7.47 + 0.35 4.39
(7.25-8.62) (7.38-8.03) (6.74-7.20) (6.76-7.83) (6.14-6.82) (7.03-7.41) (7.05—8.15)
BZP DSO EA 2 2.28 £0.13 2.30 + 0.05 2 se Wale 1.90 + 0.09 2.34+0.14 2.64 + 0.17 1.76
(2.16—2.75) (2.07-2.57) (2.24-2.36) (2.01-2.54) (1.79-2.00) (2.17-2.47) (2.31—2.80)
LAB 4.59+0.21 4.51+40.12 4.23 +0.13 4.23 +0.12 3.86 + 0.14 4.55 +0.07 4.45+0.11 3:23
(4.26—5.23) (4.28-4.74) (4.04-4.34) (3.98-4.43) — (3.73-4.05) (4.48-4.63) (4.23-4.61)
CLM 3.80 + 0.07 4.1340.12 3.78 + 0.05 3.85 +0.18 3.16 + 0.09 4.10+0.09 417+40.14 2.60
(3.66-3.93) (3.97-4.51) (3.74-3.85) (3.40-4.17) — (3.02-3.25) (3.97-4.18) (3.99-4.52)
WMI! 1.20 + 0.04 1.24 + 0.04 1.13+0.01 1.18 40.05 0.95 + 0.09 1.24 + 0.04 1.28 + 0.06 0.82
(1.12-1.29) (1.14-1.30) (1.12-1.13) (1.06-1.28) (0.86—1.06) (1.19-1.28) (1.17-1.34)
Skull tiny (ONL 17.45, CRM 2.6). Rostrum excep-
tionally short (LN/ONL = 26.7%) but this is expected to
increase in older individuals. Inter-orbital region propor-
tionately broad. Upper incisors slightly pro-odont. Inci-
sive foramina fall short of upper tooth row. T3 on M?
is present but a tiny vestige. Braincase bulbous and dor-
so-ventrally inflated. Hamular process of the squamosal
long and thin, providing for a very large subsquamosal fe-
nestra which is about 40% the size of the postglenoid fo-
ramen (see Carleton & Stanley 2005: fig. 6). Maxillo-pal-
atal suture located at the rear third of the M! (Figs 6c, 8a).
Post palatal foramina large, starting between M! and M?
and extend back to middle of M? (Figs 6c, 8a). Fronto-pa-
rietal suture broadly U-shaped. Zygomatic plate narrow
(1.34 mm) and without any sinuosity but gently sloping
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55—83
forward throughout. Mesopterygoid fossa rounded and
open widely at rostral end.
As a divergent member of the Hy/lomyscus anselli
group, some of the following characters contrast the Car-
leton et al. list of characters (2006: table 7) defining this
group: 1) pectoral mammae unknown (not available as
the holotype is a young adult), 2) upper incisors slightly
pro-odont (Fig. 6e), whereas Carleton et al. (2006) char-
acterized the H. anse/li group as opisthodont, 3) T3 on
M! is distinct and sub equal with tl rendering it ‘large’
per Carleton et al. (2006); the anterior chevron is more or
less symmetrical (Fig. 7g), whereas Carleton et al. (2006)
characterized the ‘H. anselli group as having a ‘medium’
sized t3 (e.g., smaller than tl), 4) t9 on M! is distinct
(Fig. 7g),whereas Carleton et al. (2006) characterized the
©ZFMK
64
Julian C. Kerbis Peterhans et al.
Table 5. External measurements (mean + SD, range, and sample size) of all eight members of the Hy/omyscus anselli group.
Measurements are in millimeters and mass is in grams. Abbreviated variables are defined in the text. *See text, totals have 1.0 mm
added.
Variable kerbispeterhansi — stanleyi —§ mpungamachagorum arcimontensis thornesmithae anselli heinrichorum pygmaeus
TOT 2302 12 NSS Ona al 234.3 + 6.6 DALE Bie vette (Us| 204.447.6 22244134 233.3412. sz
(201-260) (233-264) (230-244) (205-262) (193-212) (205-254) (207-255)
50 32 + 50 5 16 21 1
HB 92.6+5.6 101.74+3.8 97.8+1.9 91.3+5.6 83.2444 87.2 +64 94.8468 56
(80-103) (93-109) (95-99) (77-104) (76-87) (78-101) (82-106)
50 32 ut 50 5 16 21 1
TAIL 137.6+8.8 14515 2541 138.3463 136.0 + 9.0 Niles 353 135.2492 13852474 76
(117-158) (136-159) (132-147) (115-161) (117-125) (121-153) (121-150)
50 32) - 50 5 16 21 1
HF 20.4+0.9 DTI OFS 2073 205 DOr, 18.0+1.0 20.7% BOS 22:0" 09 14
(19-22) (20-23) (20-21) (18-22) (17-19) (19.5-21.5)* = (19.5-23)*
49 3D - 50 5 24 21 1
EAR 19.8+1.0 199+0.8 19.0 0.0 18.2+1.0 148+0.8 18.0+0.7 18.6+ 1.0 1
(17.5-22) (18-21) (19) (17-21) (14-16) (16.5-19) (17-21)
AT Eo) 4 50 5 24 21 1
Wt 24.9+4.0 27:63 ,.1 21.841.2 220i 397 13.9+1.4 20.4+ 4.0 NA 5.8
(17-39) (22-34.5) (20.5—23) (15-29.5) (11.5-15) (16-30.5)
48 3 + 50 5 15 1
TAIL/HB see Oel 1440.0 14+0.1 es 0 uh 1.4+0.1 LOrE-0. I Nese 296) 1.4
(1.2-1.7) (1.4-1.5) (1.3-1.5) (1.2-1.7) (1.4-1.5) (1.4-1.8) (1.3-1.7)
50 Sy - 50 5 16 21 1
‘H. anselli’ group as ‘indistinct’ 5) interorbital constric-
tion is amphoral, whereas Carleton et al. (2006) charac-
terized the ‘H. anselli’ group as having a ‘weak shelf,
6) rostral length is extremely short (Fig. 6a), whereas
Carleton et al. (2006) characterized the ‘H. ansell?’ group
with a ‘medium’ length rostrum, 7) incisive foramen is
short, falling well short of the alveoli of M' (Figs 6c, 8a)
as opposed to the Carleton et al. (2006) characterization
as ‘medium’ (reaching anterior root of M'), 8) the hamu-
lar strap is long and thin, subsquamosal foramen is large
in size (see Carleton & Stanley 2005: fig. 6; Fig. 6e). In
sum, several characters of this new species are unique
or align more with the Hy/omyscus alleni group than
the H. anselli group: more proodont, distinct T9 on M!,
amphoral inter-orbital region, extreme shortening of the
rostrum, and shorter incisive foramina. Perhaps these
contrasts are not surprising given the basal position of
this taxon.
Ecology. The habitat is seasonally flooded primary for-
est, ‘edaphic forest’ (Verhegghen et al. 2012). However,
the pitfall line was set in a drier part of the forest and
was less subject to flooding. The area supports two dry
seasons (January to early March, and June to early Sep-
tember) with the rest being rainy averaging ca. 210 cm
per year. Daily temperature average between 24 °C and
30°C (Doty et al. 2017). Type specimen was caught in a
generally dry area of the forest.
The vegetation of the Tshuapa region is mainly char-
acterized by sempervirent or semi-sempervirent rain
forests bound to hydromorphic soils, secondary forests
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55—83
and grassy vegetation (Evrard 1968). The sempervirent
rain forests of terra-firma are distinguished by their struc-
tural density, distinct stratification and epiphytism (Leb-
run & Gilbert 1954), while the upper stratum can reach
40-45 m in height. There are two types of forest bound to
hydromorphic soils in swampy zones. These include pe-
riodically flooded forests (including where the type spec-
imen was collected) comprising the following species:
Parinari congolensis, Guibourtia demeusei, Zeyrrhella
longipedisellata and swampy forests composed of En-
tandrophragma palustre, Alstonia congolensis, Coelo-
caryon botryodes, and Sterculia tragacantha. The second
forest type is composed of bushy forests along the banks
of large rivers including Alchornea cardifolia, Lacosper-
ma secundiflorum, waterside forests with Coelocaryon
botryodes, Erispermum microspermum, Sclerosperma
manirii, and Cleistanthus mycrophyllus. Secondary for-
ests are found around villages, roads and on former sites
of forest extraction. Species frequently observed are
Musanga cecropioides, Harungana madagascariensis,
Trema_ orientalis, Oncoba subtomentosa, Pycnanthus
angolensis, Petersianthus macrocarpus, Ricinodendron
heudelotii, Canarium schweinfurthii, Alstonia boonei,
and Elaeis guineensis. Grassy vegetation results from
forest degradation and includes frequently burnt fallow
fields, mainly with Graminaceae of the genera Panicum,
Pennisetum, Imperata, Serata, and Sorghum (Evrard
1968).
Reproduction. The sole specimen is a young female
with teats that are neither developed nor visible.
©ZFMK
Four new Hylomyscus (Muridae) from Africa 65
LBS
3
Q
z
G
ae
3
~
~2
&
Ss
~*~
«m
As
Gu
27 DRS
S]' 22Viaa,
hl-t1-40- Cb]:
hls
OSE9GOT'sS.bZIbz'9
sayy
U
was s 2)
G PrH4sig
I Va) mech
ped
GZ MOT O
>
Jogja
tT]
AlOIsiH [eANEN Jo
SL DVwAd
Tyan oad,
'Stz1hu~o
4
0)
ayAanewed
Ts,9
NS
ZI-bl-94.- 2€]
“of
£908-o
On
gov
e' a
Len
“W
59°52
of
rp
297
H
'Q
@-i\
47a)
can
ra
feel 'aheo,
LS fA avots
"press
va) mad
Zlaz Auac F]
19
1
h
Zaz vol al
WEg De
I
pays lm
a
une
Joplin
1@hN
Fig. 5. Skins of two new species of the Hylomyscus anselli group from the Democratic Republic of Congo. (a) ventral and (c) dorsal
views of Hylomyscus pygmaeus sp.nov., and (b) ventral and (d) dorsal views of Hylomyscus thornesmithae sp.nov.
Etymology. Named for its diminutive size. We recom-
mend “pygmy wood mouse” as an English common
name.
Hylomyscus thornesmithae sp. nov. Kerbis Peterhans,
Hutterer & Demos
urn:lsid:zoobank.org: act: DAE95 BEF-D424-42C2-8415-A1805F 494ADC
Hylomyscus sp. — Doty et al. (2017)
Holotype. Field Museum of Natural History, Division
of Mammals number FMNH 222524 (field number WT
Stanley 11,664; CDC 746), collected by W.T. Stanley, 27
June 2013 (originally listed as Hylomyscus sp.). The type
specimen, consisting of an alcoholic carcass with skull
removed, is an adult female with first upper molar in ear-
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55-83
ly wear (advanced age stage IV) and large teats (2+4).
The basisphenoid-occipital suture is fused. External mea-
surements were made in the field: TL 210, TV 124, HF
18, EL 15, Wt 15. Specimen caught in a standard snap
trap; apparently held by tail in trap as tail is broken
way down. Type specimen captured just behind camp in
secondary growth forest on the edge of a forest that may
occasionally be subject to flooding.
Type locality. Democratic Republic of Congo, Tshuapa
Province, rt side Tshuapa River, 14 km north of Boende
by road, Quatorz (0.16919° S, 20.92611° E) at an eleva-
tion of 322 m.
©ZFMK
66 Julian C. Kerbis Peterhans et al.
a4
Fig. 6. Skulls of two new species of the Hylomyscus anselli group from the Democratic Republic of Congo. (a) Dorsal (c) ventral
and (e) lateral views of Hylomyscus pygmaeus sp.nov. (b) Dorsal, (d) ventral and (f) lateral views of Hylomyscus thornesmithae
Sp. nov.
Paratypes (n = 4). All caught in conventional trap lines
from Democratic Republic of Congo, Tshuapa Province,
4 km N of Boende, Baleko (0.24127° S, 20.8833° E)
at an elevation of 358 m: FMNH 219611 (WTS 11471,
CDC 103), alcoholic carcass with extracted skull, old
scrotal male; FMNH 219612 (WTS 11592, CDC 224)
alcoholic carcass with extracted skull, old female, teats
2+4; FMNH 2119613 (WTS 11594, CDC 226), alcohol-
ic carcass with extracted skull, old scrotal male; FMNH
219689 (WTS 11481, CDC 113), skin and skull with car-
cass preserved in alcohol, old scrotal male, testes 10x5.
Diagnosis. Easily differentiated within the Hy/omyscus
anselli group by its small size (second smallest, but still
much larger than preceding species): HB 83 (mean), Wt
13.9 (mean), ONL 22.8 (mean), CLM 3.2 (mean). All
are significantly smaller than all other members of the
H. anselli group (Tables 4-5), excepting the previously
described species.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55—83
Comparisons. Upper incisors orthodont, contrasting
with the proodont condition in Hylomyscus pygmaeus.
Crown length of upper molars 3.0—3.25 mm, much larg-
er than Hylomyscus pygmaeus (under 2.6 mm). External
and cranio-dental measurements smaller than all other
members of the H. anse/li group (excepting Hylomyscus
pygmaeus).
Description. Size very small (mean HB = 83, mean mass
= 13.9). Tail 46% longer than HB, unicolor with ca. 18
annulations per cm. Ears of normal size, 18% of HB; ear
color dark grey. Belly hairs 5 mm, basal 3 mm slate grey,
distal 2 mm white. Dorsal hairs 7 mm, basal 5 mm slate
grey, apical 2 mm orange, more bright orange towards
flanks. Vibrissae up to 33 mm in length, mostly black
but with 2—3 white hairs; upper lip with white fur patch
behind vibrissae. Teats 2+4. The hind foot possesses the
standard murine complement of 6 pads (see Ibe et al.
2014: fig. 2, Il for reference); there is a single accessory
pad on the 1“ and 4" interdigital pads; the first is clear
and well-defined while the 4" is larger and more integrat-
©ZFMK
Four new Hylomyscus (Muridae) from Africa 67
3%)
Fig. 7. Sketches of right upper (top row) and lower tooth rows (bottom row) of members of the Hylomyscus anselli group, including
four new species described herein: (a) H. stanleyi sp. nov. (FMNH 171512), (b) H. anselli (BMNH 74.250), (c) H. kerbispeterhansi
(FMNH 209995), (d) H. mpungamachagorum sp. nov. (FMNH 177889), (e) H. arcimontensis (FMNH 147271), (f) H. thorne-
smithae sp. nov. (FMNH 222524), (g) H. pygmaeus sp. nov. (FMNH 219684). Scale = 1 mm.
Fig. 8. Sketches of the bony palates of Hy/omyscus anselli and the four new species of the Hy/omyscus anselli group: (a) H. pyg-
maeus sp. nov. FMNH 219684, (b) H. thornesmithae sp. nov. FMNH 222524, (c) H. mpungamachagorum sp. nov. FMNH 177889,
(d) H. stanleyi sp. nov. FMNH 171362, and (e) H. anse/li BMNH 74.250. Scale = 5 mm.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55—83 ©ZFMK
68 Julian C. Kerbis Peterhans et al.
10 mm
A B
FMNH 222524
H. thornesmithae
FMNH 193233
H. mpungamachagorum
Cc D
FMNH 171516 RS 1113
H. stanleyi H. anselli
Fig. 9. Sketches of feet and plantar tubercles of four species of the Hylomyscus anselli group: (a) H. thornesmithae sp. nov., (b)
H. mpungamachagorum sp. nov., (c) H. stanleyi sp. nov., and (d) H. anselli.
ed (Fig. 9a). The number of fleshy palatal ridges are not
visible on any of the prepared skulls.
Skull small (mean ONL = 22.8, mean CRM = 3.2).
Rostrum short, LN/ONL = 33.7%. Upper incisors ortho-
dont. Incisive foramina fall well short of upper tooth row.
T3 on M? is tiny. Braincase elongated. Hamular process
of the squamosal long and thin, providing for a large
subsquamosal fenestra which is about 35% the size of
the post glenoid foramen (see Carleton & Stanley 2005:
fig 6; Fig 6f). Maxillo-palatal suture zig-zags through
the middle of the M! (Figs 6d, 8b). Post palatal foramina
large, starting at rear 3 of M! or between M! and M? and
continues through to the 1* third of M?. Zygomatic plate
Slightly sinuous. In aged individuals (FMNH 219611,
FMNH 219612), the incisive foramina fall even shorter
of the UTR, the maxillo-palatal suture is located more
forward at the first half of M! and the post palatal foram-
ina are more forward at the rear half of the M!. Frontopa-
rietal suture broadly rounded, U-shaped. Zygomatic plate
narrow (1.9 mm) and virtually orthogonal to skull profile
but gently sloping forward in lower third. Mesopterygoid
fossa rounded at rostral end.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55—83
As a member of the Hylomyscus anselli group (sensu
Carleton et al. 2006: table 7), the following characters
are relevant: 1) mammae: 2+4, 2) upper incisors ortho-
dont (Fig. 6f), 3) T3 on M! is ‘medium’ in size (smaller
than t1), the anterior chevron is moderately asymmetrical
(Fig. 7f), 4) T9 on M! is distinct but reduced (Fig. 7f), 5)
interorbital constriction is amphoral in shape (Fig. 6b).
6) rostral length is short, LN/ONL = 33.7% (Fig. 6b), 7)
incisive foramen is very short, falling short of the roots
of M1 (Figs 6d, 8b), 8) the hamular strap is short but
thin and delicate and allows for a large subsquamosal fo-
ramen, which is about 25% the size of the postglenoid
foramen (Fig. 6f).
Distribution. Known only from two locations, both are
ca. 250 km S of the Congo River, off the right bank of
the Tshuapa River, Tshuapa Province, Democratic Re-
public of Congo. In addition to the type locality (n = 1),
four paratypes are from 4 km N of Boende at Baleko
(0.24127° S, 20.8833° E, elevation 358 m).
Ecology. Type specimen and 3 paratypes all caught in
standard mammal snap traps while the fifth was caught
©ZFMK
Four new Hylomyscus (Muridae) from Africa 69
Fig. 10. Live photos of two new species of the Hylomyscus anselli group from Tanzania: (left) H. stanleyi sp. nov. and (right)
H. mpungamachagorum sp. nov.
in a Sherman live trap. Type specimen captured in re-
generating secondary forest on the edge of a seasonally
flooded forest. One specimen captured in a trap line that
was never flooded during heavy rain events while three
came from a trap line that was prone to flooding.
Reproduction. All animals captured (n = 5) were adult.
Type is adult female with swollen teats 2 + 4. A second
female (FMNH 219612), despite having well-worn mo-
lars (beyond stage VII), had small teats that are difficult
to decipher. Three adult males all with scrotal testes; tes-
tes of FMNH 219689 measured 10 x 5 in the field.
Etymology. Ellen Thorne Smith was a “professional vol-
unteer” serving 2—3 days per week, sorting and organiz-
ing the bird collections at the Field Museum, and con-
ducting original published research from the mid 1930’s
until the 1970’s. During World War II with the museum’s
ornithologists away in Washington, she ran the Division
of Ornithology. We recommend “Mother Ellen’s wood
mouse” as an English common name.
Hylomyscus stanleyi sp. nov. Kerbis Peterhans, Hutter-
er & Demos
urn: lsid:zoobank. org: act: 45 12E5DE-2139-46CB-B2F9-823C9C3B1IBAD
Hylomyscus anselli — Carleton & Stanley (2005); Car-
leton, Kerbis Peterhans & Stanley (2006); Demos, Ag-
wanda & Hickerson (2014a); Carleton, Banasiak & Stan-
ley (2015)
Hylomyscus cf. anselli — Nicolas et al. (2020)
Holotype. Field Museum of Natural History, Division
of Mammals number FMNH 171362 (field number WT
Stanley 4968), collected by Cosmos, 03 August 2001
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55—83
(originally listed as Hylomyscus sp.). The specimen, con-
sisting of a skin, skull and alcoholic carcass, is an adult
pregnant female with first upper molar well worn (stage
IV of Verheyen & Bracke 1966). Teats 2+4, large, embry-
os 4L, 1R (CR 14). The holotype was captured in a local
snare baited with corn. The basisphenoid-occipital suture
is fused. External measurements were made in the field:
TL 256, HB 106, TV 154, HF 21, EL 20, Wt 29.
Type Locality. Tanzania, Rukwa Region, Sumbawanga
District, Mbizi Forest Reserve, 0.5 km N, 4 km E of W1-
panga, elevation 2200 m, 7.8639° S, 31.6694° E.
Paratypes (n = 32). Mbizi Forest Reserve, 0.5 km N,
4 km E of Wipanga, elevation 2200 m, 171357-171361,
171363=) AS67751 171518866, 6-1).«/ 863925.
31.6694° E; Mbizi Forest Reserve, 0.5 km S, 3 km E of
Wipanga, 2300 m, 171342-171356, 171512—-171516
(12 m, 8 f), 7.8639° S, 31.6694° E.
Diagnosis. UTR >3.97 mm, maxillo-palatal suture locat-
ed at the rear third to the rear half of M! (Fig. 8d), rostrum
elongate (LN/ONL= 37.33, LN>9.3; Fig. 12b, Table 4),
very large posterior palatal foramen (ca. 0.7-0.9 mm)
starting between M! and M? and extending into anterior
half of M? (Figs 8d, 12d), very large sub-squamosal fo-
ramen (30-40% area of postglenoid foramen, Fig. 12f),
fronto-parietal suture shallow V-shaped, zygomatic plate
only slightly sinuous in lateral view, incisive foramina
fall either just short of the alveoli of M' or barely reach-
ing alveoli of M! (Figs 8d, 12d). Tl of M1 deflected far
posteriorly (Fig. 7a).
©ZFMK
70 Julian C. Kerbis Peterhans et al.
t
es
w
Day
\
8\
ped
eo
oe
re
ars
“A
1B
S
=
woreu te %
wav ob rng ty reg Sere |
WX El -t25 5457410] 6
words
ove}
14/9
f yreiye
=hS!
psp
S)1Fox
rw sy st
wr,
by
gc-IT
"2, EEL Ihobd'S,09U"2009| 4
“bry Ve:
t
thoy Worry, Pwo
we bY Ths F
“QHE Gg" Or
AN PIN wy Z/)
wurel
WooltT
uA FMI
(MUS tiny verw
"9,01; Shol€' Sy
WAsIsay 4597
We moqwnic! yo
5
H
b
"YE “W9Q) GH SbZ2
ra}
C
Eooz LMY ST bb
“gp fawns fly nodes
if?
"sve 2]
“w 00Z
eébs
ah’
Pupsig w
9Ibh sim
Fig. 11. Skins of two new species of the Hy/omyscus anselli group from Tanzania. (a) Ventral and (c) dorsal views of Hylomyscus
mpungamachagorum sp. nov., (b) Ventral and (d) dorsal views of Hylomyscus stanleyi sp. nov.
Comparisons. One of the largest members of the H.
anselli group with an upper molar crown length over 4.0,
thereby needing comparison with only Hylomyscus hein-
richorum and H. anselli. Compared to H. heinrichorum,
H. stanleyi is typically orthodont vs. slightly opisthodont,
see Carleton et al. 2015: fig. 7c (as H. stanleyi) vs. fig.
7b, has longer nasals (mean of 10.1 vs. 9.2; Ibid. 6c as
H. anselli vs. 6b) with a more narrow zygomatic plate
(Ibid. fig. 6c as H. anselli vs. fig. 6b, mean of 2.3 vs.
2.6) and with incisive foramina that do not penetrate the
upper tooth row or alveoli (Ibid. fig. 6c as H. anselli vs.
6b). Since the sample size of available H. ansel/li is small
(n = 4), we expect these differences may become more
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55—83
ambiguous as older individuals and additional samples
of H. anselli become available.
Description. Size large (mean HB = 102, mean mass
= 27.5 g; Table 5). Tail 43% longer than HB. Tail uni-
color with ca. 15 annulations per cm. Belly hairs ca.
9 mm, basal 6 mm slate grey, apical 3 mm white. Dorsal
hairs ca. 11 mm, basal 6 mm slate grey, terminal 3 mm
tipped with light brown. Dorsum of head same color as
dorsum of body. Upper lip with whitish hairs but with
grey roots. Ears with blackish skin, hairs barely visible.
Vibrissae long, up to 35 mm, black in color. Pes dirty
white in appearance due to white hairs overlaying darker
skin. Manus white. The hind foot possesses the standard
©ZFMK
Four new Hylomyscus (Muridae) from Africa 71
Fig. 12. Skulls of two new species of the Hy/omyscus anselli group from Tanzania. (a) Dorsal, (c) ventral and (e) lateral views of
Hylomyscus mpungamachagorum sp. nov., (b) Dorsal, (d) ventral and (f) lateral views of Hylomyscus stanleyi sp. nov.
murine complement of 6 pads (see Ibe et al. 2014: fig. 2.
II for reference); there 1s a single accessory pad on each
of the 1‘, 2nd and 4" interdigital pads; the first is larger
and well-integrated into the 1* interdigital pad, the 2" 1s
small but distinct from the 2" interdigital pad, while the
4" is smaller but distinctly separate from the 4" interdig-
ital pad (Fig. 9c). There are seven fleshy palatal ridges:
two are continuous and pre-dental, one is discontinuous
and pre-dental, and the last four are discontinuous and
inter-dental (Fig. 13).
Skull large (mean ONL = 27.2, mean CLM = 4.1, Ta-
ble 4). Rostrum much longer than other members of the
‘H. ansell’ group (LN/ONL = 37.3%), with nasals ex-
ceeding 9.3 mm (Table 4). Upper incisors generally or-
thodont, but a few slightly opisthodont. Incisive foramina
fall short of upper tooth row crown but may reach alveoli.
T3 on M? is large. Braincase elongate rather than rounded
or globular. Hamular process of the squamosal thin, al-
lowing for a large subsquamosal fenestra (ca. 30% of post
glenoid foramen). Maxillo-palatal suture at third lamina
of the M'. Post palatal foramina large (0.7—0.9 mm), be-
ginning between M! and M? and continuing through the
1* third or half of the M?. Frontoparietal suture V-shaped.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55—83
Zygomatic plate narrow (mean breadth = 2.3 mm) and
orthogonal to the long axis of the skull. Mesopterygoid
fossa more rectangular at rostral end.
As a member of the Hylomyscus anselli group, the
following characters are relevant: 1) mammary formu-
la 2+4, 2) upper incisors orthodont with some individ-
uals (5 of 33) slightly opisthodont, 3) T3 on M! is large
and is more or less equal in size to T1, but T1 is deflect-
ed further posteriorly (Fig. 7a), 4) T9 on M! is distinct
(Fig. 7a), 5) interorbital constriction has a weak shelf, 6)
rostral length is long, LN/ONL = 37.3%, 7) incisive fora-
men is short, falling just short of the M' or barely meet-
ing the beginning of the alveolus, 8) the hamular strap is
thin allowing for well-developed subsquamosal foramen
but which is proportionately smaller than in the two new
DRC species (Figs 6e-f vs. Figs 12e—f).
Habitat. Mbizi is the largest area of montane cloud forest
(ca. 2,000 ha) remaining on the denuded Ufipa Plateau.
All of the extant forest is contained within the Mbizi For-
est Reserve and is discontinuous with forest patches in-
terspersed with grasslands. There is very little continuous
canopy cover due to removal of commercially valuable
©ZFMK
72 Julian C. Kerbis Peterhans et al.
Fig. 13. Sketch of soft palate of Hylomyscus anselli from Zam-
bia displaying the 2+(1+4) dental ridges format typical of the
Hylomyscus anselli group: from tip of rostrum (to the left): 2
continuous pre-dental ridges, 1 discontinuous pre-dental ridge,
4 discontinuous inter-dental ridges.
timber species and exploitation for firewood and charcoal
(Rodgers et al. 1984). The forest is on the eastern facing
escarpment overlooking the Rukwa Trough. Surveys of
the vegetation at Mbizi include those by Mtuy & Mkude
(1974), Rodgers et al. (1984), and Rufo & Mabula (1987).
The forest canopy reaches 25 m in places with dominant
tree species being Aguarista salicifolia, Allophyllus ab-
yssinicus, Croton megalocarpus, Macaranga capensis,
Neoboutonia macrocalyx, Olea chrysophylla, Olinia
rochetiana, and Prunus africana (Rodgers et al. 1984).
The understory is between 8—20 m with the most com-
monly encountered tree species being: Bersama abyssi-
nica, Cathula edulis, Clerodendron sthulmanii, Bridelia
brideliifolia, Polyscias fulva, and Rhus natalensis (Rod-
gers et al. 1984, Rufo & Mabula 1987). The most striking
aspect of Mbizi forest is scattered Euphorbia amplophyl-
la that emerge above the canopy up to 35 m (Rodgers
et al. 1984). Forest cover has been fragmented by past
fires and smaller patches are now isolated on the periph-
ery and in sheltered valleys. These are surrounded by
species-rich grasslands maintained by nearly annual fires
(Rufo & Mabula 1987). The central forest block is more
or less continuous and covers an area of over 2000 ha.
However, much of this is disturbed as the reserve is sur-
rounded by villages and heavily exploited for firewood
and charcoal. The area has many endemic plants (e.g.,
Brillantaisia richardsiae, Glossostelma mbisiense, Pach-
ycarpus pachyglossus, Spermacoce azurea, Sebaea per-
pava, Afrotysonia pilosicaulis) and several undescribed
plant species including a possible new species of Ocotea
(Q Luke, pers. comm. ).
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55—83
Reproduction. Of the 33 examples of the new species
collected (July—Aug 2001), there were 18 males and 15
females. All can be considered adult (3 molars in ad-
vanced wear). Of the 15 females, 14 were inspected inter-
nally: 7 were pregnant, 7 were not. All pregnant females
had either 4 or 5 embryos with an average crown rump
length of 12-13 mm. The pregnant females averaged 28
g in weight while those that were not pregnant weighed
an average of 25 g. All males were adult with scrotal tes-
tes. The entire population had well-worn molars, at least
in advanced wear stage IV (Verheyen & Bracke 1966).
Distribution. Known only from two montane forest lo-
calities within Mbizi Forest, SW Tanzania: the type lo-
cality at % km S and 3 km E Wipanga, 2300 m (31.6667°
E, 7.875° S) and a second locality % km N, 4 km E Wi-
panga, 2200 m (31.6694° E, 7.8639° S).
Etymology. Named for William T. Stanley (1957-2015)
who directed the collection of all known specimens (n =
33) of this species from the Mbizi Mountains of Tanzania
in 2001 as well as the type specimen of the other three
species described in this manuscript (and many more).
We recommend “Stanley’s wood mouse” as an English
common name.
Hylomyscus mpungamachagorum sp. nov. Demos,
Hutterer & Kerbis Peterhans
urn: |sid:zoobank.org:act:283 1A D81-BSBF-41FC-82D3-35F 2069CO016A
Holotype. Field Museum of Natural History, Division
of Mammals, FMNH 177889 (field number WT Stanley
5988), collected by WT Stanley, 25 Aug 2003 (originally
listed as Hylomyscus sp.). The specimen, consisting of a
study skin and skull with postcranial skeleton, is an adult
scrotal male (testes 13 x 8 mm) with worn first upper mo-
lar (stage IV of Verheyen & Bracke 1966). The basisphe-
noid-occipital suture is fused. External measurements
were made in the field: TL 244, HB 99, TV 147, HF 20,
EL 19, Wt 20.5. The holotype was collected in a standard
snap trap (Museum Special).
Type locality. Tanzania, Kigoma Region, Kigoma Dis-
trict, Mahale Mountains, Mahale National Park 2100 m,
0.5 km NW Nkungwe Hill summit (29.77895° E,
6.10433° S).
Paratypes (n= 11). Tanzania, Mahale National Park, Ma-
hale Mountains, Mahale National Park 2100 m, 0.5 km
NW Nkungwe Hill summit (29.77895° E, 6.10433° S)
178011, 177888, 177890-177892, 177911; Kabezi Riv-
er, 1180 m, 193233 (29.8317° E, 6.1131° S); Mahale
National Park, Mfitwa Mt, 2440 m, 193234, 193218
(29.7939° E, 6.1317° S); Mahale National Park, 0.5 km
S of Pasagulu Hill, 1420 m (29.75353° E, 6.06618° S),
177886, 177887.
©ZFMK
Four new Hylomyscus (Muridae) from Africa 73
Diagnosis. A member of the H. anse//i group with a short
rostrum (nasals are 34.5% of ONL, Table 4), posterior
palatal foramen located posteriorly (at the first lamina of
M’, Figs 8c, 12c), and maxillo-palatal suture located pos-
teriorly — either between second and third lamina of M!
or at level of third lamina of M! (Figs 8c, 12c). Zygomat-
ic plate slightly sinuous in lateral view. Sub-squamosal
fenestra moderate (ca. 25-30% of postglenoid foramen;
i.e., Carleton & Stanley 2005: fig. 6; Fig. 12e). Incisive
foramina penetrate the alveoli of the upper tooth row
(Figs 8c, 12c). Frontoparietal suture shallowly U-shaped.
Comparisons. A mid-sized member of the Hylomyscus
anselli group with an upper molar crown length ca.
3.8 mm, needing comparison only with H. kerbispeter-
hansi and H. arcimontensis. It is unique among these
three in the location of its posterior palatal foramina, lo-
cated at the beginning of the second molar (Figs 8c, 12c);
in H. kerbispeterhansi it is located at the third lamina of
the M!, while in H. arcimontensis it is located between
M! and M?’. The morphometrics of H. mpungamachago-
rum align closely with H. arcimontensis; indeed, it falls
completely within its morphometric space (Figs 1-2).
Compared to H. kerbispeterhansi, the skull is smaller (CI
23.3 vs 24.7, Table 4) and with shorter nasals (LN 8.7 vs
9.45) and diastema (LD 6.95 vs. 7.82) (Table 4).
Description. Size medium (mean HB = 98, CLM 3.74—
3.85, mean mass = 22 g). Mean tail length 41% longer
than HB. Tail unicolor with ca. 15 annulations per cm.
Belly hairs 6 mm, basal 3 mm slate grey, distal 3 mm
light brown. Dorsal hairs 10 mm, basal 8 mm slate grey,
apical 2 mm light brown. Dorsum of head same color as
back. Upper lip with white hairs, dark grey roots. Vibris-
sae long, black, up to 35 mm in length. Pes dirty white
in appearance due to white hairs overlaying darker skin.
Manus white. Ears black, hairs inconspicuous. The hind
foot possesses the standard murine complement of 6 pads
(see Ibe et al. 2014: fig. 2 Il for reference); there is a
single accessory pad on each of the 1* and 4" interdig-
ital pads; the first is large and well-integrated into the
1‘ inter-digital pad, while the 4" is smaller and distinct
from the 4" interdigital pad (Fig. 9b). There are seven
fleshy palatal ridges: two are continuous and pre-dental,
One 1s discontinuous and pre-dental, and the last four are
discontinuous and inter-dental (as in Fig. 13).
Skull medium (mean ONL=25.25 mm, mean CLM =
3.8 mm). Rostrum moderate (nasals 34.5% GLS). Upper
incisors orthodont but slightly opisthodont in younger in-
dividuals. Incisive foramina just reach the M! alveoli. T3
on M? is tiny but distinct as in the other species described
here. Braincase elongated. Hamular process of the squa-
mosal long and thin, allowing for a moderate subsqua-
mosal fenestra (ca. 25% of postglenoid foramen). Maxil-
lo-palatal suture either falling between 2™ and 3 lamina
of M1 or at 3 lamina of the M1. Post palatal foramina
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55—83
small, lying level with 1‘ lamina of M?. Zygomatic plate
narrow (mean = 2.3 mm) and slightly sinuous. Mesopter-
ygoid fossa rounded at rostral end.
In comparison with other members of the H. anselli
group, the following characters are relevant: 1) mamma-
ry formula 2+4, 2) upper incisors orthodont but younger
individuals (wear stage III and IV, 1.e., FMNH 177890-
1778892, 193218) slightly opisthodont, 3) T3 on M'! is
large, the anterior chevron more or less equal in size to
Tl and T1 not as deflected far posteriorly as in H. stan-
leyi (Fig. 7d), 4) T9 on M! is distinct (Fig. 7d), 5) interor-
bital constriction has a weak shelf, 6) rostral length (LN/
ONL) is moderate at 34.5%, 7) incisive foramen meets
the beginning of the M! alveoli (in the four younger in-
dividuals the incisive foramina penetrate the upper tooth
row crowns), 8) the hamular strap is long and thin and the
subsquamosal foramen is well developed but proportion-
ately smaller than in the new Congolese species (H. pyg-
maeus, H. thornesmithae) described above (Figs 12e).
Unlike other species described herein, several skulls of
this taxon show anomalous patterns of the palate includ-
ing extra post palatal foramen (FMNH 177887, 177888,
193218) and interrupted incisive foramina (FMNH
177886, 177887). One specimen (FMNH 193234) also
displays a white tail tip.
Distribution. Known only from Mahale National Park,
1180-2440 m, western Tanzania.
Reproduction. Of the specimens collected, there were
7 males and 5 females. The reproductive condition of
4 females was inspected: females collected on Aug 25 &
28, 2005 had no embryos (FMNH 177888, 177890) but
the former was lactating. Two others were in the ear-
ly stages of pregnancy: FMNH 178011, collected on
25 Aug., 2003 (CR = 5 mm) and FMNH 193233, collect-
ed 9 Nov., 2005 (CR = 7 mm).
Habitat. The Mahale Peninsula is predominately cov-
ered with Brachystegia (Miombo) woodland, but higher
elevations on the Mahale Ridge are covered in montane
grasslands and forest (Itani 1990). Forest is also found
on the western and southwestern slopes from the ridge at
2400 m down to lowland forests at 780 m on the shore
of Lake Tanganyika. The montane forest vegetation is an
outlier of the Albertine Rift forests. Over 1,170 plant spe-
cies, of which 39 are Albertine Rift endemics, have been
recorded at Mahale (Nishida & Uehara 1981; Nishida
1990; Plumptre et al. 2007).
One specimen was collected in riverine forest along
the Kabezi River. This river and other smaller tributar-
ies flowing down the Mahale and Kabezi ridges are lined
with riverine forest surrounded by tall Miombo wood-
land with stands of solid-stemmed bamboo, Oxytenan-
thera abyssinica. Higher up on the Mahale Ridge, the
Miombo gives way to tall montane grassland dominated
©ZFMK
Julian C. Kerbis Peterhans et al.
74
-
_ Central African Republic
2.
©
Oo
pee
©
os
a
O
¢
D
a
ie pe
, ukuga
ade
Tanzania’ - =
Fig. 14. Map of current biogeographic units and their possible barriers in eastern Africa as relevant to the H. anselli and H. denniae
groups.
©ZFMK
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55-83
Four new Hylomyscus (Muridae) from Africa 7d
by Hyparrhenia spp., Themeda triandra, and Festuca
sp., with scattered Protea gauguedi, Erythrina abyssini-
ca, Cussonia arborea and isolated Parinari curatellifo-
lia. The riverine forest canopy reaches 30 m in places
and is dominated by Newtonia buchannanii, Parinari ex-
celsa, Bridelia micrantha, and Spathodea campanulata,
with occasional TZabernaemontana stapfiana, Ficus sur,
Ficus thonningii, Zanha golungensis, Prunus africana,
and Myrianthus holstii. The understory 1s dominated by
woody shrubs and Aframomum alboviolaceum (Plumptre
et al. 2003; Moyer 2006).
Two specimens originated in the Mfitwa Forest, on
the SE side of the Mfitwa Peak (6°7°54” S, 29°47°38”
S, 2440 m) which is surrounded by extensive areas of
species-rich montane grasslands. The dominant species
included Festuca sp., Themeda triandra, and Hyparrhe-
nia rufa. Mature parts of Mfitwa forest in sheltered val-
leys reach a canopy height of 30 m. Dominate species in-
clude: Polyscias fulva, Parinari curatellifolia, Agaurista
salicifolia, Croton megalobostrys, Croton sylvaticus,
Bersama abyssinica, Trichilia emetica, Ficus thonningii,
Myrianthus arboreaus, Maesa lanceolata, and Syzygium
caminnii. The diverse forest understory is dominated by
Olyra latifolia, Dracaena laxissima, Mondia whitei, Re-
nealmia engleri, Psychotria sp., dense stands of bracken
fern, Pteridium aquilinum, in light gaps and at the for-
est edge. Large areas of the forest are covered in nearly
impenetrable monodominant stands of montane bamboo,
Oldeania alpina, with very few other species penetrat-
ing this heavily shaded zone. Occasionally a forest tree
emerges through the canopy in such stands; these areas
are likely to be secondary, and at least some of them were
under cultivation in the past (Itani 1990).
Etymology. The species is named for Noah E. Mpunga
and Sophy J. Machaga, who run the Southern Highlands
Conservation Program for the Wildlife Conservation
Society. These leading conservationists have dedicated
the last 20 years to helping describe, advocate for, and
protect some of Tanzania’s most threatened and iconic
species. We recommend “Mahale wood mouse” as an
English common name.
DISCUSSION
Comments on cryptic diversity
With the results presented here, the numbers of recog-
nized species of Hylomyscus have increased from 8 to 21
since 2005. The 160% increase documented here over the
past 14 years for Hylomyscus is an extraordinary number
for a continental system; typically, sites of high increase
in newly described species diversity are found on island
systems (e.g., Madagascar, Goodman & Soarimalala
2018; Indonesia, Demos et al. 2016; Philippines, Heaney
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55—83
et al. 2016). For Hylomyscus, such increases are due to
the resurrection of synonymized taxa, new explorative
surveys, and the recognition of cryptic species through
genetic methods. Recently, based on molecular results,
Nicolas et al. (2020) have shown that an additional 8—10
Species remain undescribed from the genus, including
potentially one more from the anse/li group (figs 1-2:
H. sp7). Accordingly, we predict a further increase of at
least 30% over the next decade within the genus, because
other species groups, especially those primarily distrib-
uted in the Congo Basin, have not yet been satisfactorily
collected, documented or analyzed. We predict compa-
rable increases will be attained in several other African
small mammal groups including Graphiurus, Dendro-
mus, Crocidura and various microbat species complexes
currently being documented by Demos, Patterson, Es-
selstyn, Voelker, Kerbis Peterhans and colleagues (e.g.,
Demos et al. 2018, 2019a, 2019b; Patterson et al. 2019).
Such cryptic, typically nocturnal, small mammal species
that form the bulk of mammalian diversity (>70%), are
often unrecognized by the scientific community. As an
alternative, the work of Krasova et al. (2019) has tak-
en a different approach in their review of the Mus triton
complex; despite relatively important genetic multilocus
differences among allopatric populations they have not
split the complex into multiple species. Genetic analyses
provided here are crucial in uncovering cryptic diversity
within Hylomyscus. Although similar morphologically,
H. stanleyi is only distantly related to true H. anselli,
with which it had been co-mingled. Its close geograph-
ic proximity (ca. 400 km) and similar phenetics made it
tempting to include the two as a single taxon (Carleton &
Stanley 2005; Carleton et al. 2006; Demos et al. 2014a;
Carleton et al. 2015; Nicolas et al. 2020).
Sadly, despite the lip-service, this is an era marked by
declining resources and opportunities for field work and
surveys, closure of dozens of natural history collections,
a collapse in the number of trained alpha taxonomists
and a lack of appreciation for the importance of biodi-
versity and the willingness to document it (Winker 1996;
Tewksbury et al. 2014). Further, some conservation ad-
ministrators feel 1t more important to protect individual
organisms rather than entire ecosystems (Goodman &
Lanyon 1994), a short-sighted strategy easily maintained
by arm-chair ‘conservationists’. Although this strategy
may make sense among high profile taxa like gorillas or
pandas, many ecosystems do not boast such charismatic
species. The high fecundity of most small mammal spe-
cies makes them quite resilient to collecting, but habitat
loss reduces viable populations permanently. Further,
integrative taxonomic revisions of small mammals can
identify the regions with the highest (most valuable) evo-
lutionary diversity and therefore provide straightforward
suggestions for prioritization of conservation efforts.
©ZFMK
76 Julian C. Kerbis Peterhans et al.
Comments on biogeography
The Cytb data (Fig. 4) suggest that the once united clades
of H. anselli and H. denniae (under Hylomyscus denniae)
are not only distinct, reciprocally monophyletic, and not
each other’s sisters, but also have separate lowland for-
est origins. This answers the question posed by Carleton
et al. (2006: 318) on whether or not these two montane
species groups shared a recent common ancestor, rela-
tive to taxa from the Guineo-Congolian lowlands. The
occurrence of two new members of the H. anse/li group
in the heart of the Congo Basin, including the first one to
diverge, suggests a lowland origin for the group. Other
members of core Congo Basin taxa (1.e., H. alleni and H.
parvus groups) form a clade sister to the H. anselli group.
In addition, within the H. anse/li group, H. pygmaeus
from the Congo Basin is sister to all other members. Hy-
lomyscus thornesmithae from the Congo Basin is sister
to our East Africa clade (Kenya, Tanzania and Malawi).
Additional material from the Guineo-Congolian rainfor-
est, especially from the left bank of the Congo/Lualaba
River, may shed light on these biogeographic relation-
ships, as would ancestral area reconstruction, which was
not carried out in this study.
A significant phylogeographic break, shown here be-
tween the H. anselli/H. heinrichorum clade and the
rest of the H. anselli clade (excepting H. pygmaeus and
H. thornesmithae but including H. kerbispeterhansi,
H. stanleyi, H. mpungamachagorum, and H. arcimonten-
sis) has been depicted by Chapin (1932: fig. 18) in his
delimitation of bird distributions. Chapin distinguishes a
Rhodesian Highland District (= Zambian, including the
ranges of H. heinrichorum and H. anselli; Chapin 1932:
fig. 18, zone 14; see our Fig. 14) from an East African
Highland District (zone 13, known known here as the
East African clade), including the remaining taxa. It may
be that these zones are separated by the Luangwa River
Valley in northeastern Zambia as has been shown for the
divide between Praomys delectorum of northern Malawi
and Praomys jacksoni of NE Zambia (Ansell 1978: Map
187; Bryja et al. 2012: fig. 2c). The Luangwa River also
seems to be the eastern limit in the distribution of Hy-
lomyscus anselli (as “Praomys denniae’ in Ansell 1978:
Map 188; Bryja et al. 2012: fig. 2d). Further collecting
on both sides of the upper Luangwa River is necessary to
determine if this break holds for other small mammals.
This biogeographic break, as well as additional potential
barriers to extant small mammal distributions, are de-
picted in Fig. 14. Although not as strongly supported, the
sister relationship of H. arcimontensis to other members
of the East African clade (Fig. 4), demonstrates the long
term isolation of the Eastern Arc Mountains from adja-
cent East African montane systems.
Mbizi Forest is, by definition, an Albertine Rift Forest,
as it is adjacent to the SW end of Lake Tanganyika. It
also lies ca. 200 km NW of the Southern Highlands of
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55—83
Tanzania and floristically is most closely related to these
latter forests and the mountains around the northern end
of Lake Malawi (Kerfoot 1964; White et al. 2001). There
is no clear geographical barrier to montane forest species
between Mbizi Forest and the forests around the northern
end of Lake Malawi in the Southern Highlands. These
areas are connected by high ground that could have
supported montane forest in a wetter and colder period.
However, there may have been a rain-shadow from the
Southern Highlands that would have limited the extent of
forest in this area (Moreau 1966).
Mbizi also contains elements of the forests of the Ken-
yan Highlands (Lovett 1990) as well as the Albertine
Rift forests (30 of the 70 tree species are Albertine Rift
endemics; Plumptre et al. 2007). Looking to the north,
mixed affinities and disjunctions in distribution may be
explained by the Karema Gap (Moreau, 1966), which
forms an ecological barrier between Mbizi forest and the
forested habitats of the Mahale Mountains (aka Kungwe
Forest). This is a trough nearly 100 km wide extending
from the shore of Lake Tanganyika southeast to the Ruk-
wa Valley (further discussion below). Much of the terrain
in the Karema Gap lies below 1000 m and forms a major
biogeographical barrier to montane forest bird species
distribution (Moreau 1966). It is apparent that this gap is
also an important barrier for mammals.
Mbizi Forest is at the southern end of the postulated
southwestern dispersal route for Guineo-Congolian for-
est species into the Eastern Arc (Lovett & Wasser 1993).
However, Mbizi falls within the Lake Tanganyika cli-
mactic zone (Lovett 1990) and has notable faunistic dif-
ferences. A number of neo-endemic and relictual forms
of birds, reptiles, amphibians, and mammals are found in
Mbizi with varying affinities to taxa in the Eastern Arc,
Southern Highlands, Albertine Rift, and Guineo-Con-
golian forests (Vesey-Fitzgerald 1964; Moreau 1966;
Britton 1980; Channing & Howell 2006; Plumptre et al.
2007). This is reflected in our phylogeny (Fig. 4) as
the Mbizi population (Hy/omyscus stanleyi) is sister to
H. kerbispeterhansi from the Kenyan Highlands rather
than the more proximate Mahale population (H. mpunga-
machagorum).
There are significant differences between the small
mammal communities of Mbizi and the Southern High-
lands: Mbizi is inhabited by Praomys jacksoni (Mize-
rovska et al. 2019), whereas the Southern Highlands are
inhabited by the phylogenetically distant Praomys delec-
torum (Bryja et al. 2014; Sabuni et al. 2017). Though they
are sister species, Mbizi houses the endemic Lophuromys
sabunii, while Southern Highlands are inhabited by Lo-
phuromys machangui (Verheyen et al. 2017; Sabuni et al.
2018). Finally, Mbizi is inhabited by Crocidura montis
1b, while Southern Highlands are inhabited by Crocidu-
ra montis 3 = ‘luna’ (Sabuni et al. 2018: fig. 2b). On the
other hand, the dry forest species living in woodland ec-
otones were able to disperse from northern part of South-
©ZFMK
Four new Hylomyscus (Muridae) from Africa 77
ern Highlands to the northwest along Lake Tanganyika
(e.g., Mus triton, clade D, Krasova et al. 2019; Gram-
momys surdaster, clade su4, Bryja et al. 2017).
The montane forests of the Mahale Mountains are also
an outlier of the Albertine Rift forests (Plumptre et al.
2007). To their south is the Karema Gap while to their
north lies the 70 km. wide Kigoma-Malagarasi River
Gap, separating Mahale from the Burundi Highlands
(Moreau 1966). In an earlier, unfortunately overlooked
paper, Moreau (1943) reviewed geological evidence for
the origins of the Karema Gap and pointed to an ancient
west to south-east trough of a geological age exceeding
that of the Lake Tanganyika basin. On the west side of
Lake Tanganyika, this trough is filled by the Lukuga
River, which exits the lake at Kalemie (formerly Al-
bertville). The age of this trough may explain why HAy-
lomyscus stanleyi is more closely related to Hylomyscus
kerbispeterhansi in southern Kenya (almost 1000 km to
the northeast) than to the more proximate taxon, Hylomy-
scus mpungamachagorum, less than 300 km to the north.
Moreau was convinced that Karema Gap is of much
greater biogeographic significance than the Malagarasi
River Gap.
On their western slope, Mahale forest cover is near-
ly continuous from the montane forests on the ridge at
2400 m down to lowland forests at 780 m on the shore
of Lake Tanganyika. Only 39 of the 1,170 plant species
recorded at Mahale are Albertine Rift endemics (Nishi-
da & Uehara 1981; Plumptre et al. 2007). The lowland
forests harbor mammal species more typical of the
Guineo-Congolian lowland forests (Moyer 2006), in-
cluding Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii, Manis gigantea,
and Protoxerus stangeri ssp., aS well as birds (e.g.,
Phyllastrepus scandens) and reptiles (e.g., Dendroaspis
jJamesoni). At least two small mammal species from the
W.T. Stanley 2003 Mahale survey have an origin in the
Southern Highlands of Tanzania (including Mt. Rungwe)
with extensions into the Marungu Highlands of DRC.
These are Otomys lacustris Allen & Loveridge, 1933 and
Rhynchocyon cirnei reichardi Reichenow, 1886: see dis-
cussions in Taylor et al. (2009), Corbet & Hanks (1968),
and Rathbun (2017: fig. 3). Small mammals originat-
ing in the Albertine Rift include Grammomys cf. dryas,
Praomys jacksoni and Sylvisorex aff. ruandae. On the
other hand, both new species of Tanzanian Hylomyscus
described here (H. mpungamachagorum, H. stanleyi) are
closely related to forms from the Kenyan Highlands and
the Eastern Arc montane archipelago (Fig. 4). It is likely
that when the ancestor of the Eastern Afromontane clade
of H. anselli group dispersed from the Congo Basin, the
Albertine Rift Mountains were already inhabited by the
H. denniae clade. They were able to colonize the periph-
eral (southern) parts of these mountains, from where they
colonized the Eastern Arc Mountains up to parts of the
Kenyan Highlands. In both the Kenyan and Tanzanian
Highlands, the H. anselli and H. denniae groups are typi-
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55—83
cally mutually exclusive; only in the Mau Forest (Kenya)
are both species groups found in sympatry.
Several other breaks in the distribution of the Hylomy-
scus denniae and Hylomyscus anselli clades, referenced
in Figure 14 are worthy of mention. One of them is the
restriction of Hylomyscus denniae to the Ruwenzori
Mountains of western Uganda and eastern DRC as first
demonstrated by Huhndorf et al. (2007) and subsequent-
ly by Demos et al. (2014a). This break is reinforced by
the Semliki River to the south and the Victoria Nile to
the north. Surveys of the Blue Mountains to the north
of the Ruwenzoris would be enlightening in this regard.
The arid corridor of northeastern Uganda, here called
the Karamoja Gap (Fig. 14), further isolates species of
H. denniae (sensu strictu) from other Hy/momyscus ssp.
in western Kenya (e.g., Mt Elgon and Cherangani Hills;
Demos et al. 2014a). Our collections and surveys have
failed to detect members of the Hylomyscus denniae or
Hylomyscus anselli groups in the Imatong Mountains of
southern Sudan and their foothills in northern Uganda
(i.e., Agora Agu Forest Reserve); only Hylomyscus stella
has been recovered from these forests. Butynski (in litt.)
believes that the primate communities (1.e., galagos and
vervets) of Agora Agu/Imatong Forests are slightly more
closely allied with the Albertine Rift forests than with the
Kenya Highlands and further, that the Victoria Nile, de-
Spite its young age may have been a factor in isolating the
chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) to the Albertine Rift (al-
though they have older mid-Pleistocene fossils in Kenya;
McBrearty & Jablonski, 2005).
Another arid corridor, the Tsavo Gap (Fig. 14), sep-
arates the northernmost population of Hylomyscus ar-
cimontensis (Taita Hills in SE Kenya) from another
relative of the Hylomyscus anselli group in the Kenya
Highlands (Hylomyscus kerbispeterhansi) as well as the
more distantly related Hylomyscus endorobae (Mt. Ken-
ya, the Aberdares and Mau Escarpment). It is curious
that no Hylomyscus spp. have persisted in the Volcanic
Highlands of northern Tanzania (Mt. Kilimanjaro, Mt.
Meru, Arusha, Ngorongoro Crater) despite our collect-
ing efforts in these areas. In this regard, specimens from
northern Tanzania (Tengeru, Ngorongoro) referred to Hy-
lomyscus anselli by Bishop (1979) in his seminal paper,
were misidentified.
The distribution of Hylomyscus arcimontensis (indeed
the genus Hylomyscus) comes to an abrupt end in Mwen-
embwe Forest, Nyika National Park, northern Malawi.
This gap, called here, the central Malawi Gap, at about
12° south, lies ‘between Nyika and Mount Ntchisi within
the central highlands of Malawi’ (Kaliba 2014: 213 in
his discussion of bird and mammal distributions; see his
fig. 6.1). In her review of avian biogeography in Mala-
wi, Dowsett-Lemaire (1989) pinpoints the major Malawi
avian break slightly further south, at 14°.
These biogeographic factors have received little atten-
tion since Moreau’s (1966) discussion of their impacts on
©ZFMK
78 Julian C. Kerbis Peterhans et al.
bird distributions. The biotic impacts of these isolating
mechanisms must be considered in future conservation
management decisions. Given this faunal mosaic, the
discovery of pockets of endemism, and the likelihood
of discovering further unknown biodiversity, we call for
new surveys of the virtually undocumented highlands of
the Albertine Rift along the shores of Lake Tanganyika
including the Marungu Highlands of southeastern Dem-
ocratic Republic of Congo (not surveyed since 1884 by
Richard Bohm; Noack 1887) and Gombe Mountain NP,
well known for its chimpanzees but little else.
Key to Afromontane Hylomyscus (excepting W Afri-
ca) plus all members of the H. anselli group
1. Supra-orbital shelf strongly beaded .........0...00000..
AEP et rome ihr» cet oe: litte H. aeta (Thomas, 1911)
2. Supra-orbital shelf not beaded... 3
3. Sub-squamosal foramen tiny/absent, hamular
process short & thick (H. denniae group) .............. 5
4. Sub-squamosal foramen large, hamular process
Taso inna9 ce ers sh mee na ae 8 age 2 shoe cae ae rae so 9
5. Only found in Ruwenzori montane forests, size large
ONL 25 .6-27.8 00.0... H. denniae (Thomas, 1906)
6. Found in other East African montane forests ........ 7
7. Size large, CI 26.8—28.6, Kenya only: Mt Kenya,
Aberdares & Mau forests ..0.......0.cccccccccccseeeeteeens
Bets. ance ee a nel H. endorobae (Heller, 1910)
8. Size small, Cl 24-26 mm, Albertine Rift S of
Ruwenzoris (not including Tanzania) ...........0.....00..
....H. vulcanorum (Lonnberg & Gyldenstolpe, 1925)
9. Teats 4+4, incisors orthodont ............0.00000cc ee
pn ON Ree NES 2 ReaD H. stella (Thomas, 1911)
10. Teats 2+4, incisors proodont, orthodont or weakly
opisthodont (HA. anselli group) ..........00..ccccecceees 1
1la.Crown length of upper tooth row under 3.3 (Congo
FFAS SITIAL YM. 0, fk de TO ay Ree ee Soa tes 13
11b.Crown length of upper tooth row 3.3—4.0
(AirOMOn Caine: A CCH iM, ste oN aso 22 ss ate ee 15
llc.Crown length of upper tooth row over 4.0
(Atromeontane. lated) ewes se: eres ee 2 a 19
13. Crown length of upper tooth row under 1.8, slightly
PROOCONE. © x, hE!) Ae eae H. pygmaeus (sp. nov.)
14. Crown length of upper tooth row 3.0-3.25,
OLLNOGOMUpS ae. 2 ame los St H. thornesmithae (sp. nov.)
15. Post palatal foramina at rear (3™ lamina) of M1, LD
and NL longer, Table 4 (montane Kenya only) ........
TO Meee H. kerbispeterhansi Demos et al., 2014
16. Post palatal foramina between M1 and M2 or at
beginning of M2, LD and NL shorter, Table 4 ..... 17
17. Post palatal foramina between M1 and M2, incisive
foramina fall just short of upper molar alveoli, upper
incisors orthodont (Eastern Arc only) ............0.0..04.
Sener H. arcimontensis Carleton & Stanley, 2005
18. Post palatal foramina at beginning of M2, incisive
foramina reach upper molar alveoli, upper incisors
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55—83
typically opisthodont (Mahale Mts only) ................
Armee need fet aoe ew a ke H.. mpungamachagorum (sp. nov.)
19. Incisive foramina penetrate CLM, © slightly
opisthodont (Angola only)... ecceceeeees
pograh gears. 08. 22 H. heinrichorum Carleton et al., 2015
20. Incisive foramina do not penetrate CLM ............. A
21. Occipito-nasal length under 26.4, nasal length under
9.4 (Zambia only) ............. H. anselli (Bishop, 1979)
22. Occipito-nasal length over 26.3, nasal length over
9.3 (Mbizi Mts only) ............... H. stanleyi (sp. nov.)
Acknowledgements. Thanks to A Ferguson, Collections
Manager and JD Phelps, Assistant Collections Manager (both
Field Museum) for their assistance. T Hanrahan assisted with
data gathering. P Jenkins, R Portela-Miguez, and L Tomsett
(BMNH) provided access to collections at the Natural History
Museum (London). C Mateke (Curator of Mammals, Nation-
al Museum of Zambia, Livingstone) provided photographs of
the field data of all Zambian-based specimens of Hylomyscus
anselli, where the majority of specimens from this taxon are
housed. Figs. 13 1s courtesy of R Kistinger. Fig. 9d are based on
photos of palate and feet taken by M Lovy and L Ple8tilova re-
spectively, using material collected during fieldwork organized
by R Sumbera (Zambia) and J Krasova (Angola). J Weinstein,
Field Museum, Photography, provided the skull and skin pho-
tos of the type specimens (Figs. 5, 6, 11, 12). We thank the Col-
laborative Invertebrate Laboratories at the Field Museum, Dr
M Thayer for use of imaging equipment (funded by NSF grant
EF-0531768/subcontract 144-439), the Grainger Foundation,
and S Ware for layered photography of Hy/omyscus palates and
tooth rows. WT Stanley took the photos of the live specimens
of H. mpungamachagorum and H. stanleyi. SO Bober (FMNH)
prepared Fig 3. Q Luke updated botanical taxonomy and pro-
vided important botanical input for Tanzanian localities. MA
Rogers has provided crucial data and assistance throughout. We
acknowledge the One Health Office, Center for Disease Con-
trol and Prevention (Atlanta, USA) and National Institute of
Health’s grant 1RO1TW008859-01: Sylvatic Reservoirs of Hu-
man Monkey Pox for having funded two trips (2012, 2013) to
DR Congo. Fieldwork in Angola was supported by the Grant
Agency of the University of South Bohemia no. 018/2017/.
For work, permits and funding the senior author extend thanks to
the following. Burundi: L Davenport, AJ Fisher, A Nibizi, and P
Trenchard, with permit approval from the Institut National pour
Environment et la Conservacion de la Nature (Mr A Nyokindi &
Dr L Ntahuga, Directeurs General). For Uganda: M Grey, S Jen-
nings, PK Austin, R Kityo, K Musana, and E Tibenda with permit
approval from the Department of Game (Moses Okua) and the
Research and Monitoring Section of the Uganda Wildlife Author-
ity. For work in the Democratic Republic of Congo: J Hart and
T Hart (TL2 and Epulu), with permit approval from the Institut
Nacional pour la Conservacion de la Nature; the scientific team at
Lwiro (Centre de Recherché des Sciences Naturelles, Dr A Bash-
wira, Scientific Director), including J Mwanga, B Ndara Ruszi-
ga, R Kizungu, P Kaleme and R Nishuli. For work in Rwanda: T
Mudakikwa (MINIRENA), Minister of Environment; N Ntare,
Michel Masozera, Nerissa Chao (all of Wildlife Conservation
Society), Rwanda Development Board and National Universi-
ty of Rwanda. For work in Kenya: B Agwanda and S Musila
with permits and logistical support from Kenya Forest Service,
Kenya Wildlife Service, and the National Museums of Kenya.
For financial support, we acknowledge the Barbara Brown Fund,
the Ellen Thorne Smith Fund, the Marshall Field HI Fund of The
©ZFMK
Four new Hylomyscus (Muridae) from Africa 79
Field Museum, the John D and Catherine T MacArthur Founda-
tion, the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWEF-Itombwe) and the
Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS-Rwanda, DR Congo). F
Dowsett-Lemaire, R Dowsett, J Bates and T Butynski provided
helpful input on biogeography of birds in Malawi and primates
in northern Kenya. Comments from Ryan Norris and one anon-
ymous reviewer are gratefully acknowledged. This project be-
gan some 2’ years ago when one of us (RH) noticed that the
identification of a specimen from WT Stanley’s collection from
the DR Congo did not look like ‘Dendromus’ as it had been
catalogued.
REFERENCES
Ansell WFH (1978) Mammals of Zambia Ansell. The National
Parks and Wildlife Service, Chilanga, Zambia, 11 + 126 pp.,
204 distribution maps, 11 other maps, 2 tables
Bishop IR (1979) Notes on Praomys (Hylomyscus) in Eastern
Africa. Mammalia 43: 519-530
Britton PL ed. (1980) Birds of East Africa. East African Natural
History Society, Nairobi
Brosset A, DuBost G, Heim de Balsac H (1965) Mammiferes
inédits récoltes au Gabon. Biologica Gabonica 1: 147—174
Bryja J, Mazoch V, Patzenhauerova H, Mateke C, Zima Jr. J,
Skliba J, Sumbera R (2012) Revised occurrence of rodents
from the tribe Praomyini (Muridae) in Zambia based on mi-
tochondrial DNA analyses: implications for biogeography
and conservation. Folia Zoologica 61: 268—283
Bryja J, Mikula O, Patzenhauerova, H, Oguge, N, Sumbera R,
Verheyen E (2014) The role of dispersal and vicariance in
the Pleistocene history of an East African mountain rodent,
Praomys delectorum. Journal of Biogeography 41: 196-208
Bryja J, Sumbera R, Kerbis Peterhans, JC, Aghova T, Bryjova
A, Mikula O, Nicolas V, Denys C, Verheyen E (2017) Evo-
lutionary History of the Thicket rats (Genus Grammomys)
mirrors the evolution of African Forests since Late Miocene.
Journal of Biogeography 44: 182—194
Carleton MD, Banasiak RA, Stanley WT (2015) A new species
of the genus Hy/omyscus from Angola, with a distributional
summary of the H. ansel/li species group (Muridae: Murinae:
Praomyini). Zootaxa 4040: 101-128
Carleton MD, Kerbis Peterhans JC, Stanley WT (2006) Review
of the Hylomyscus denniae group (Rodentia: Muridae) in
eastern Africa, with comments on the generic allocation of
Epimys endorobae Heller. Proceedings of the Biological So-
ciety of Washington 119: 293-325
Carleton MD, Stanley WT (2005) Review of the Hylomyscus
denniae complex (Rodentia: Muridae) in Tanzania, with a
description of a new species. Proceedings of the Biological
Society of Washington 118: 619-646
Carleton MC, Van der Straeten (1997) Morphological differ-
entiation among Subsaharan and North African populations
of the Lemniscomys barbarus complex (Rodentia: Muridae)
Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 110:
640-680
Channing A, Howell, K (2006) Amphibians of East Africa. Cor-
nell University Press, Ithaca, New York
Chapin, JP (1932) The Birds of the Belgian Congo, Bulletin of
the American Museum of Natural History Part 1 Vol LXV:
1-756
Corbet GB, Hanks J (1968) A revision of the elephant shrews,
Family Macroscelididae. Bulletin of the British Museum
(Natural History) Zoology 16: 47-111
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55—83
Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D (2012) jModelTest
2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Na-
ture Methods 9: 772
Demos TC, Agwanda B, Hickerson MJ (2014a) Integrative tax-
onomy within the Hylomyscus denniae complex (Rodentia:
Muridae) and a new species from Kenya. Journal of Mam-
malogy 95: E1-E15
Demos TC, Kerbis Peterhans JC, Agwanda B, Hickerson MJ
(2014b) Uncovering cryptic diversity and refugial per-
sistence among small mammal lineages across the Eastern
Afromontane biodiversity hotspot. Molecular Phylogenetics
and Evolution 71: 41-54
Demos TC, Kerbis Peterhans JC, Joseph TA, Robinson JD,
Hickerson MJ (2015) Comparative population genomics of
African montane forest mammals support population per-
sistence across a climatic gradient and Quaternary climatic
cycles. PLoS ONE 10 (9): e0131800. https//doi.org/10.1371/
journal.pone.0131800
Demos TC, Achmadi AS, Giarla TC, Handika H, Rowe KC,
Esselstyn JA (2016) Local endemism and within-island di-
versification of shrews illustrate the importance of speciation
in building Sundaland mammal diversity. Molecular Ecology
25: 5158-5173
Demos TC, Webala PW, Bartonjo M, Patterson BD (2018) Hid-
den diversity of African yellow house bats (Vespertilionidae,
Scotophilus): insights from multilocus phylogenetics and lin-
eage delimitation. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 6: 86.
https//do1.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00086
Demos TC, Webala PW, Kerbis Peterhans JC, Goodman SM,
Bartonjo M, Patterson BD (2019a) Molecular phylogenetics
of slit-faced bats (Chiroptera: Nycteridae) reveals deeply
divergent African lineages. Journal of Zoological Systemat-
ics and Evolutionary Research 57: 1019-1038. https//doi.
org/10.1111/jzs.12313
Demos TC, Webala PW, Goodman SM, Kerbis Peterhans JC,
Bartonjo M, Patterson BD (2019b) Molecular phylogenet-
ics of the African horseshoe bats (Chiroptera: Rhinolophi-
dae): expanded geographic and taxonomic sampling of the
Afrotropics. BMC Evolutionary Biology 19: 166. https//doi.
org/10.1186/s12862-019-1485-1
Doty JB, Malekani JM, Kalemba LN, Stanley WT, Monroe
BP, Nakazawa YU, Mauldin MR, Bakambana TL, Liyand-
ja TLD, Braden ZH, Wallaca RM, Malekani DV, McCollum
AM, Gallardo-Romero N, Kondas A, Peterson AT, Osorio
JE, Rocke TE, Karem KL, Emerson GL, Carroll D (2017)
Assessing Monkeypox virus prevalence in small mammals
at the human-animal interface in the Democratic Republic of
Congo. Viruses 9: 283
Dowsett-Lemaire F (1989). Ecological and biogeographical as-
pects of forest bird communities in Malawi. Scopus 13: 1-80
Evrard C (1968) Recherche écologique sur les peuplements for-
estiers de la Cuvette Centrale Congolaise. Scientific Series,
INEAC, Brussels
Goodman SM, Lanyon S (1994) Scientific Collecting. Conser-
vation Biology 8: 314-315
Goodman SM & Soarimalala V (2018) Systématique des ron-
geurs endémiques malgaches (famille des Nesomyinae:
sous-famille des Nesomyinae)/ Systematics of endemic Mal-
agasy rodents (family Nesomyidae: subfamily Nesomyinae).
Pp. 373-381 in: Goodman SM, Raherilalao MJ, Wohlhauser
S (eds) Les aires protégées terrestres de Madagascar: Leur
histoire, description et biote/ The terrestrial protected areas
of Madagascar: Their history, description, and biota. Associ-
ation Vahatra, Antananarivo
©ZFMK
80 Julian C. Kerbis Peterhans et al.
Hammer 0, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontolog-
ical statistics software package for education and data analy-
sis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4: 1-9
Heaney LR, Balete DS, Duya MRM, Duya MV, Jansa SA,
Steppan SJ, Rickart EA (2016) Doubling diversity: a cau-
tionary tale of previously unsuspected mammalian diversity
on a tropical oceanic island. Frontiers of Biogeography 8.2,
e29667: 1-19
Huhndorf MH, Kerbis Peterhans JC, Loew, SS (2007) Com-
parative phylogeography of three endemic rodents from the
Albertine Rift, east central Africa. Molecular Ecology 16:
663-674. https://doi.org/10.1111/).1365-294X.2007.03153.x
Ibe CS, Salami SO, Ajayi IE (2014) Trunk and paw pad skin
morphology of the African giant pouched rat (Cricetomys
gambianus, Waterhouse-1840). European Journal of Anato-
my 18: 175-182
Itani, J (1990) Safari Surveys of the Vegetation and the Chim-
panzee groups in the Northern half of the Mahale Mountains.
In: T. Nishida (ed.) The Chimpanzees of the Mahale Moun-
tains: Sexual and Life History Strategies. University of To-
kyo Press, Tokyo
Kaliba, PM (2014) Faunal turnover between east and southern
African terrestrial vertebrates: Is Malawi the geographical
break? Ph.D. dissertation, University of Capetown, Ronden-
bosch, South Africa
Kerfoot O (1964) A first checklist of the vascular plants of
Mbeya Range, Tanganyika. Tanganyika Notes and Records
62: 27-43
Krasova J, Mikula O, Mazocha V, Bryja J, Ri¢ana O, Sumbera,
R (2019) Evolution of the Grey-bellied pygmy mouse group:
Highly structured molecular diversity with predictable geo-
graphic ranges but morphological crypsis. Molecular Phylo-
genetics and Evolution 130: 143-155
Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA
X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across com-
puting platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35:
1547-1549
Lebrun J, Gilbert G (1954) Une classification écologique des
foréts du Congo. Publication of the Institut National pour
l'étude Agronomique du Congo Scientific Series no 63: 1-89
Lecompte E, Granjon L, Kerbis Peterhans J, Denys C (2002)
Cytochrome b-based phylogeny of the Praomys group (Ro-
dentia, Murinae): a new African radiation? Comptes Rendus
Biologies 325: 827-840
Lovett JC (1990) Classification and status of the moist forests
of Tanzania. Mitteilungen aus dem Institut ftir Allgemeine
Botanik Hamburg 23a: 287—300
Lovett JC, Wasser SK, eds. (1993) Biogeography and ecology
of the rain forests of eastern Africa. Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge
Mammal Diversity Database (2019). American Society of
Mammalogists. http//www.mammaldiversity.org. [last ac-
cess 20 Nov. 2019]
McBrearty S, Jablonski NG (2005) First fossil chimpanzee. Na-
ture 437: 105-108
Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIP-
RES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic
trees. Pp. 1-8 in: Proceedings of the Gateway Computing
Environments Workshop (GCE), 14 Nov. 2010, New Orle-
ans, LA
Mizerovska D, Nicolas V, Demos TC, Akaibe, D, Colyn M, De-
nys C, Kaleme PK, Katuala P, Kennis J, Kerbis Peterhans JC,
Laudisoit A, Missoup AD, Sumbera R, Verheyen E, Bryja J
(2019) Genetic variation of the most abundant forest-dwell-
ing rodents in Central Africa (Praomys jacksoni complex):
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55—83
Evidence for Pleistocene refugia in both montane and low-
land forests. Journal of Biogeography 46: 1466-1478
Moreau RE (1943) A transverse zoo-geographical barrier on the
east side of Lake Tanganyika. Nature 152: 569-570
Moreau RE (1966) The bird faunas of Africa and its islands.
Academic Press, London
Moyer DC (2006) Biodiversity of Mahale Mountains National
Park. Report for the Mahale Ecosystems Monitoring Project
and Frankfurt Zoological Society. Iringa, Tanzania
Mtuy CMP, Mkude MJ (1974) An Inventory of Four Forest Re-
serves in Sumbawanga District. Forest Resources Study 4.
Maliasili, Tanzania
Musser GG, Carleton MD (2005) Superfamily Muroidea.
Mammal species of the world: A taxonomic and geograph-
ic reference 3% ed. vol. 2. Johns Hopkins University Press,
Baltimore
Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, Haeseler A von, Minh BQ (2015)
IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for esti-
mating maximum likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biolo-
gy and Evolution 32: 268-274
Nicolas V, Wendelen W, Barriere P, Dudu A, Colyn M (2008)
Morphometric variation in Hylomyscus alleni and H. stella
(Rodentia: Muridae), and description of a new species. Jour-
nal of Mammalogy 89: 222—231
Nicolas V, Olayemi A, Wendelen W, Colyn M (2010) Mito-
chondrial DNA and morphometrical identification of a new
species of Hylomyscus (Rodentia: Muridae) from West Afri-
ca. Zootaxa 2579: 30-44
Nicolas V, Fabre PH, Bryja J, Denys C, Verheyen E, Missoup
AD, Olayemi A, Katuala P, Dudu A, Colyn M, Kerbis Pe-
terhans JC, Demos TC (2020) The phylogeny of the Afri-
can wood mice (Muridae, Hylomyscus) based on complete
mitochondrial genomes and five nuclear genes reveals their
evolutionary history and undescribed diversity. Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution. Online publication number:
106703. https//doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106703
Nishida T, Uehara S (1981) Kitongwe name of plants: a prelim-
inary listing. African Study Monographs 1: 109-130
Nishida T ed. (1990) The Chimpanzees of the Mahale Moun-
tains: Sexual and Life History Strategies. University of To-
kyo Press, Tokyo
Noack R (1887) Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Saéugethierfau-
na von Ost- und Central Afrika. Zoologische Jahrbiicher 2:
193-301
Patterson BD, Webala PW, Bartonjo M, Goodman, SM, Demos
TC (2019) Genetic variation in Afrotropical species of Myo-
tis (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Journal of Mammalogy
100: 1130-1143
Plumptre AJ, Eilu G, Ewango C, Ssegawa P, Nkuutu D, Ge-
reau R, Beentje H, Poulsen AD, Fischer E, Goyder D, Pearce
TR, Hafashimana D (2003) The Biodiversity of the Albertine
Rift. Section 7: Plants. Albertine Rift Technical Reports No.
3. Wildlife Conservation Society: 63-72
Plumptre AJ, Davenport TRB, Behangana M, Kityo R, Eilu G,
Ssegawa P, Ewango C, Meirte D, Kahindo C, Herremans M,
Kerbis Peterhans J, Pilgrim JD, Wilson M, Languy M, Moyer
DC (2007) The biodiversity of the Albertine Rift. Biological
Conservation 134: 178-194
Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA
(2018) Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics
using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67: 901-904
Rathbun GB (2017) Identifying the different forms of giant sen-
g1 (Rhynchocyon) based on external color patterns. Afrotheri-
an Conservation Newsletter 13 (September): 7—9
©ZFMK
Four new Hylomyscus (Muridae) from Africa 81
Rodgers WA, Struhsaker TT, West CC (1984) Observations
on the red Colobus (Colobus badius tephrosceles) of Mbizi
Forest, south-west Tanzania. African Journal of Ecology 22:
187-194
Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling
A, Hohna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck
JP (2012) MRBAYES 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic
inference and model selection across a large model space.
Systematic Biology 61: 539-542
Rufo CK, Mabula CK (1987) First report of Botanical survey
of Mbizi Forest Reserve. Unpublished report for the Rukwa
Integrated Rural Development Project by TAFORI Silvicul-
tural Research Station, Lushoto, Tanzania.
Sabuni C, Aghova T, Bryjova A, Sumbera R, Bryja J (2018)
Biogeographic implications of small mammals from North-
ern Highlands in Tanzania with first data from the volcanic
Mount Kitumbeine. Mammalia 82: 360-372
Sikes RS (2016) 2016 Guidelines of the American Society of
Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research and
education. Journal of Mammalogy 97: 663-688
Steppan SJ, Schenk JJ (2017) Muroid rodent phylogenetics:
900-species tree reveals increasing diversification rates.
PLoS ONE 12 (8): e0183070. https://doi.org/10.1371/jour-
nal.pone.0183070
Taylor PJ, Maree S, van Sandwyk J, Kerbis Peterhans JC,
Stanley WT, Verheyen E, Kaliba P, Verheyen W, Kaleme P,
Bennett NC (2009) Speciation mirrors geomorphology and
paleoclimatic history in African laminate-toothed rats (Mu-
ridae: Otomyini) of the Otomys denti and Otomys lacustris
species-complexes in the ‘Montane Circle’ of East Africa.
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 96: 913-941
APPENDIX 1
Specimens examined in this study (n = 199). Specimens
included in the morphometric analyses only are in stan-
dard type, those included in both morphometric and mo-
lecular analyses are in boldface type, and those included
in the molecular analyses only are indicated with an as-
terisk (*). All specimens include Field Museum of Nat-
ural History (FMNH) catalogue numbers except for the
Hylomyscus anselli type series from the British Museum
of Natural History (BMNH), National Museum of Zam-
bia (NMZ), Specimens from the Czech Republic located
at the University of South Bohemia and at the Institute of
Vertebrate Biology have the following acronyms: ANG
for specimens from Angola and RS for specimens from
Zambia.
Hylomyscus aeta (1): Uganda, Nteko Parish, edge of
Bwindi-Impenetrable NP, 1600 m: 160492*.
Hylomyscus anselli (19): Zambia, Mwinilunga Dist.:
Jimbe Stream, BMNH 74.250 (TYPE), NMZ 3639,
NMZ 3808; Kasombu Stream (‘Isombu’, see Ansell,
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55-83
Tewksbury JT, Anderson JGT, Bakker, JD, Billo TJ, Dunwid-
die PW, Groom MJ, Hampton, SE, Herman SG, Levey DJ,
Machnicki NJ, Martinez del Rio C, Power ME, Rowell K,
Salomon AK, Stacey L, Trombulak SC, Wheeler, TA (2014)
Natural History’s Place in Science and Society. Bioscience
64: 300-310
Thomas, O (1926). The generic position of certain African Mu-
ridae, hitherto referred to Aethomys and Praomys. Annals
and Magazine of Natural History 9(17): 174-179
Verhegghen A, Mayaux P, de Wasseige C, Defourny P (2012)
Mapping Congo Basin vegetation types from 300 m and
1 km multi-sensor time series for carbon stocks and forest
areas estimation. Biogeosciences 9: 5061-5079
Verheyen WN, Hulselmans, JLJ, Dierckx T, Mulungu L, Leirs
H, Corti M, Verheyen E (2007) The characterization of the
Kilimanjaro Lophuromys aquilus True 1892 population and
the description of five new Lophuromys species (Rodentia,
Muridae). Bulletin de L’Institut Royal des Sciences Na-
turelles de Belgique, Biologie 77: 23—75
Verheyen W, Bracke E (1966) The influence of aging on the
craniometrical characters of Praomys jacksoni (de Winton
1897). Proceedings of the Colloqium on African Rodents.
Annales Musée Royal de I’Afrique Centrale, Zoologie 144:
91-110
Vesey-Fitzgerald DF (1964) Mammals of the Rukwa Valley.
Tanganyika Notes and Records 62: 61—72
White F, Dowsett-Lemaire F, Chapman JD (2001) Evergreen
forest flora of Malawi. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
Winker K (1996) The crumbling infrastructure of biodiversity:
The avian example. Conservation Biology 10: 703-707
1978), NMZ 3631; Nyanjowe Stream (‘Nyansowe’, An-
sell 1978), BMNH 74.251, NMZ 3638; Sakeyi Stream
(Sabeji, Sekezhi; see Ansell, 1978), BMNH 61.944;
Mpika Dist., Danger Hill, Lubikila Stream (‘Lubiliki-
la’, “Luitikila’; see Ansell 1978) BMNH 73.142, NMZ
2764-2767, NMZ 2769-2781; Kasanka National Park,
pontoon, RS 1113-1115; Kasanka National Park, Fib-
we, RS 1606-1607; Zambezi source, RS 803, 810, 811;
Kifubwa Rock Shelter Stream, RS 818; Nchila Wildlife
Reserve, RS 793.
Hylomyscus arcimontensis (58): Malawi, Misuku Hills,
Mughese Forest, 1625 m: 196303, 196311*, 196753,
196754—196759, 196761; Misuku Hills, Mughese Forest,
1890 m: 196762—196769; Nyika National Park, Mwen-
embwe Forest, 2233m: 211576*, 211577*; Tanzania, Mt
Rungwe, Rungwe FR, 5 km E Ilolo, 1870 m: 163584—
163588, 163590—163595; Mt Rungwe, Rungwe FR, 6 km
E, 1.2 km N of Ilolo, 2140 m: Mt Rungwe, Rungwe FR,
7kmE,2.5 km N of Ilolo, 2410 m: 163598—163600; East
Usambara Mts, 4.5 km ESE Amani, Monga Tea Estate,
870-900 m: 150120, 150121, 150123, 150124, 150125,
150142, 150143*, 150146, 150147, 150149, 150150,
©ZFMK
82 Julian C. Kerbis Peterhans et al.
150153, 150430; East Usambara Mts, 4.5 km WNW
Amani, Monga Tea Estate, 870—900 m, 150119, 151251;
East Usambara Mts, 4.5 km NW Amani, Monga Tea
Estate, 1100 m, 147291, 147476*; East Usambara Mts,
6 km NW Amani, Monga Tea Estate, 1100 m, 150118*:
West Usambara Mts., 12.5 km NW Korogwe, Ambangu-
lu Tea Estate, 1300 m, 150130, 150135, 150136, 150138,
150154, 150156, 150159.
Hylomyscus denniae (1): Uganda, Rwenzori Mts NP,
Mubuku R, rt bank, Nyabitaba Hut , 2667 m: 144526*.
Hylomyscus thornesmithae (5): Democratic Republic of
Congo, 14 km N of Boende, Quartorze, 326 m: 222524
(TYPE); 4 km N of Boende, Baliko, 358 m, 2119611-
219613,219689.
Hylomyscus endorobae (1): Kenya, Aberdare Range,
3.8km W & 2.5 km S of Gatarakwa, 2700 m: 190467*.
Hylomyscus heinrichorum (25). Angola, Mt Moco,
83793, 83795, 83796 (TYPE), 83797, 83799, 83801-
83807, 83895; Mt Soque, 83783-83792; Namba Village,
ANG 210, ANG 215, ANG 237, ANG 252, ANG 259.
Hylomyscus kerbispeterhansi (55): Kenya, Cheranga-
ni Hills, Kipkunnur Forest, 2740 m: 217377, 217381-
217382, 217383*, 217384, 217385*, 217386, 217390,
217394217395, 217408, 217422, 217605—217610,
217612—217614; Kapenguria, 153250, 2100 m; Mau
210000, 210001*, 210017 (TYPE), 210018, 210023,
210042: Mau Forest, 8.5 km N & 18.4 km E of Keri-
cho, 2320 m: 210061—210063, 210065, 210069, 210071,
Mt Elgon National Reserve, nr. Kimothon Gate, 2530 m:
217325*, 217327-217333, 217340-217342, 217345,
217354, 217358, 217597-217600, 217601, 217602,
217604.
Hylomyscus mpungamachagorum (6): Tanzania, Maha-
le Mts NP, Mahale Mts, 0.5 km NW of Nkungwe Sum-
mit, 2100 m: 177911, 177888, 177889 (TYPE), 177890;
Mahale Mts NP, Mahale Mts, 0.5 km S of Pasagulu Hill,
1420 m: 177886—177887.
Hylomyscus pygmaeus (1): Democratic Republic of
Congo, Baleko, 358 m, 219684 (TYPE).
Hylomyscus stanleyi (25): Tanzania, Mbizi Forest Re-
serve, 0.5 km N, 4 km E of Wipanga, 2200 m: 171357-
171359, 1171360, 171361, 171362 (TYPE), 171363,
171364—171367; Mbizi Forest Reserve, 0.5 km S,3 km E
of Wipanga, 2300 m: 171343, 171344, 171346—-171348,
171350, 171351, 171352, 171353, 171354-171356,
PANS 1S SASS
Hylomyscus stella (1): Uganda, Bwindi-Impenetrable
NP, Buhoma, 1500 m: 160511*.
Hylomyscus vulcanorum (1): Democratic Republic
of Congo, Itombwe Forest, 1.5 km S Lusasa, 2050 m:
Forest, 15.5 km N, 16.4 km E Bonet, 2350 m: 209997, 203881*.
APPENDIX 2
List of GenBank sequences.
Taxon Voucher No. GenBank No. Country
Hylomyscus aeta FMNH 160492 MN857618 Uganda
Hylomyscus alleni AF518328 Gabon
Hylomyscus anselli RS1113 JX126613 Zambia
Hylomyscus anselli RS1114 JX126614 Zambia
Hylomyscus anselli RS1115 JX126615 Zambia
Hylomyscus anselli RS1606 JX126616 Zambia
Hylomyscus anselli RS810 JX126617 Zambia
Hylomyscus anselli RS811 JX126618 Zambia
Hylomyscus anselli RS818 JX126619 Zambia
Hylomyscus anselli RS793 JX126620 Zambia
Hylomyscus anselli RS803 JX126621 Zambia
Hylomyscus arcimontenisis FMNH 196753 KF876468 Malawi
Hylomyscus arcimontenisis FMNH 196311 KF876469 Malawi
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55—83
Taxon
Hylomyscus arcimontenisis
Hylomyscus arcimontenisis
Hylomyscus arcimontenisis
Hylomyscus arcimontenisis
Hylomyscus baeri
Hylomyscus denniae
Hylomyscus endorobae
Hylomyscus grandis
Hylomyscus heinrichorum
Hylomyscus heinrichorum
Hylomyscus heinrichorum
Hylomyscus heinrichorum
Hylomyscus kerbispeterhansi
Hylomyscus kerbispeterhansi
Hylomyscus kerbispeterhansi
Hylomyscus kerbispeterhansi
Hylomyscus kerbispeterhansi
Hylomyscus kerbispeterhansi
Hylomyscus kerbispeterhansi
Hylomyscus kerbispeterhansi
Hylomyscus stanleyi
Hylomyscus stanleyi
Hylomyscus stanleyi
Hylomyscus stanleyi
Hylomyscus stanleyi
Hylomyscus pamfi
Hylomyscus parvus
Hylomyscus pygmaeus
Hylomyscus simus
Hylomyscus mpungamachagorum
Hylomyscus mpungamachagorum
Hylomyscus mpungamachagorum
Hylomyscus stella
Hylomyscus thornesmithae
Hylomyscus thornesmithae
Hylomyscus thornesmithae
Hylomyscus thornesmithae
Hylomyscus thornesmithae
Hylomyscus vulcanorum
Hylomyscus walterverheyeni
Four new Hylomyscus (Muridae) from Africa
Voucher No.
FMNH 211577
FMNH 147476
FMNH 150118
FMNH 150143
FMNH 144526
FMNH 190467
ANG0210
ANG0215
ANG0237
ANG0259
FMNH 217383
FMNH 217384
FMNH 217385
FMNH 217325
FMNH 217358
FMNH 217601
FMNH 210000
FMNH 210001
FMNH 171352
FMNH 171353
FMNH 171360
FMNH 171362
FMNH 171363
FMNH 219684
FMNH 177888
FMNH 177889
FMNH 177890
FMNH160511
FMNH 219611
FMNH 219612
FMNH 219613
FMNH 222524
FMNH 219689
FMNH 203881
GenBank No.
KF876477
KF810191
KF810192
KF810193
JQ735509
KF876479
KF810158
JQ735513
MN857622
MN857623
MN857624
MN857625
KF810205
KF810206
KF810203
KF810239
KF810200
KF810240
KF810226
KF810231
MN857627
MN857628
MN857629
MN857630
MN857631
JQ735527
JQ735555
MN857626
JQ735557
MN857619
MN857620
MN857621
MN857632
MN857633
MN857634
MN857635
MN857636
MN857637
KF810176
JQ735614
Country
Malawi
Tanzania
Tanzania
Tanzania
Guinea
Uganda
Kenya
Cameroon
Angola
Angola
Angola
Angola
Kenya
Kenya
Kenya
Kenya
Kenya
Kenya
Kenya
Kenya
Tanzania
Tanzania
Tanzania
Tanzania
Tanzania
Benin
Cameroon
DR of Congo
Ivory Coast
Tanzania
Tanzania
Tanzania
Uganda
DR of Congo
DR of Congo
DR of Congo
DR of Congo
DR of Congo
DR of Congo
Central African Republic
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 55—83
83
©ZFMK
BHL
i
Blank Page Digitally Inserted
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 85-94
2020 - Souza-Costa C.A. et al.
https://do1.org/10.20363/BZB-2020.69.1.085
ISSN 2190-7307
http://www.zoologicalbulletin.de
Research article
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3C 1 5E85F-2FBD-473 1-A076-2AFE02490DA5
Squamate reptiles from seasonal semi-deciduous forest remnants
in southwestern Bahia, Brazil
Carlos Augusto Souza-Costa', Caio Vinicius De Mira-Mendes’, Iuri Ribeiro Dias’, Kaique Brito Silva‘,
Antonio Jorge S. Argélo*> & Mirco Solé**
'3>.6Graduate Program in Zoology, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Rodovia Jorge Amado,
km 16, 45662-900 Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil
?Graduate Program in Tropical Aquatic Systems, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Rodovia Jorge Amado,
km 16, 45662-900 Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil
*Institute of Geosciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Rua Jodo Pandia Calogeras, Cidade Universitaria,
13083-870 Campinas, SGo Paulo, Brazil
° Herpetology Section, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, D-53113 Bonn, Germany
* Corresponding author: Email: msoleQuesc.br
'urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:3 1 A86EE5-1526-472A-9077-3953CE3A0947
2urn:Isid:zoobank.org: author: EOCB48CB-35D3-4FB9-AA 83-E786C 100AA9E
3urn:Isid:zoobank.org:author:8455227D-DC68-4785-9563-3B29A 7054900
*urn:Isid:zoobank.org:author: CFOBAB75-22F2-4C6F-9C46-402178CBEEEB
Surn:|sid:zoobank.org:author:A83A9207-39BF-4020-A035-92CA78381A71
Surn:Isid:zoobank.org:author:CO62E3CB-D966-44 1 A-8B77-1F94DC85FA92
Abstract. We present a list of Squamata from Serra do Mandim and Serra Azul, both in the Atlantic Forest domain of
Southern Bahia, Brazil. We recorded 27 species (21 snakes and six lizards). Most species can be characterized as gen-
eralists with a wide distribution as Phyllopezus pollicaris, Salvator merianae, Corallus hortulanus, Philodryas olfersii,
Oxyrhopus trigeminus and Pseudoboa nigra. However, some of the species are considered as being difficult to sample and
restricted to forest fragments such as Bothrops bilineatus, Dipsas sazimai and Echinanthera cephalostriata. The snake
fauna of both areas represents 70% of the species previously known for the semi-deciduous forests of the state of Bahia.
Although the study region is under severe anthropogenic pressure, especially due to the expansion of livestock areas, some
forest remnants still withstand a rich reptile diversity.
Key words. Snakes, lizards, richness, biodiversity, species distribution.
INTRODUCTION
Habitat loss and fragmentation are considered serious
threats for terrestrial reptiles (Bohm et al. 2013). Low
dispersion capacity, small home ranges and a low toler-
ance to temperature variations turn this group, especially
forest species, susceptible to changes in their natural en-
vironments (Gibbons et al. 2000). A recent study on the
conservation status of the world’s reptiles showed that
20% of the species are in some kind of threat category,
while another 20% are classified as data deficient (Bohm
et al. 2013). These authors also state that in tropical en-
vironments the number of threatened reptile species has
rapidly increased due to ongoing accelerated habitat de-
struction.
Despite Brazil harboring one of the largest reptile diver-
sities on the planet (Uetz et al. 1995; Costa & Beérnils
2018), a lack of information for a large part of this tax-
Received: 30.09.2019
Accepted: 05.02.2020
onomical group is the common share, mainly concern-
ing natural history aspects and distribution patterns (Ro-
drigues 2005). While a growing number of taxonomical
studies have recently led to the description of several new
species (e.g., Recoder et al. 2014; Fernandes & Hamdan
2014; Hamdan & Fernandes 2015; Barbo et al. 2016;
Rodrigues et al. 2017; Silveira & Santos-Jr 2018; Silva
et al. 2018), there is still a long way to go before this
rich reptile diversity is fully understood. The assessment
of the conservation status of 732 species and sub-species
showed that 13% of the species must be considered as
threatened or nearly threatened, while nearly 9% were
characterized as “data deficient” species (ICMBio 2014).
Knowledge of the conservation status of species is es-
sential for the implementation of conservation actions
in order to mitigate the effects of anthropic actions on
endangered species. In Bahia, the number of studies on
reptiles has increased recently and information is now
Corresponding editor: W. Bohme
Published: 10.03.2020
86 Carlos Augusto Souza-Costa et al.
380000”
8280000”
8260000 oooo0o
8240000°"”"
400000”
380000" 400000"
420000”
8280000"
000
8260000”
H lItarantin City
® Potiragua City
KE Serra do Mandim |
M Serra Azul
Elevation (m)
1181
550
~“\~— Highways
8240000”
“\-—~— Regional rivers
Fig. 1. Studied area in the Serra do Mandim (black clamp) in the municipality of Itarantim and in the Serra Azul (black square) in
the municipality of Potiragua, in southwestern Bahia, Brazil.
available for reptiles inhabiting the central (Freitas et al.
2012), western (Freitas et al. 2016a), northern (Freitas
2014; Freitas et al. 2016b; Marques et al. 2016; Freitas
et al. 2018; Freitas et al. 2019) and southern (Dixo 2001;
Argolo 2004; Dias et al. 2014) regions of the state, while
the southwestern part of the state still shows a large gap
concerning information on its reptiles.
The Mandim and Azul Mountains are located tn south-
western Bahia - Brazil, in the municipalities of Itarantim
and Potiragua, in a region classified as semi-deciduous
seasonal forest (Ibge 1997; Salino et al. 2006). They are
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 85-94
within the boundaries of the Rio Pardo and Rio Jequitin-
honha basins, bordering the northeast of Minas Gerais.
While they belong to the Atlantic Forest domain, they
suffer great influence by the Caatinga and Cerrado do-
mains. A project entitled “Biodiversity and conservation
in the Jequitinhonha and Mucuri valleys” was carried
out in the region, which, through biological inventories,
showed that even suffering high levels of degradation,
the region still maintains a great amphibian, bird, and
mammal diversity (Pinto & Bede 2006). The same au-
thors identified several priority areas for conservation
©ZFMK
Squamates of Serra do Mandim and Serra Azul 87
Fig. 2. Study areas in the southwestern region of Bahia. Fugiama farm in the Serra do Mandim (A, C and E). A: Semi-deciduous
forest fragment; C: stream; E: permanent pond. Serra Azul farm in the Serra Azul (B, D and F). B: Semi-deciduous forest fragment;
D: stream; F: permanent pond.
and emphasized the importance of more research aimed Serra do Mandim, aiming to fill a gap in the knowledge
at other still under sampled groups, as, for example, rep- of the group for the state.
tiles. Therefore, the objective of our study was to inven-
tory squamate reptile species from the Serra Azul and
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 85—94 ©ZFMK
88 Carlos Augusto Souza-Costa et al.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Between January 2015 and March 2016 six field cam-
paigns were undertaken to sample squamate reptiles
in two Atlantic Forest areas characterized as season-
al semi-deciduous forest in southwestern Bahia: at the
“Serra do Mandim” (15°37’58” S, 39°59’01” W) in
the municipality of Itarantim, and at the “Serra Azul”
(15°52’01” S, 39°55’54” W) in the municipality of Poti-
ragua (Fig. 1). During every campaign each area was
sampled between three and four days and nights, result-
ing in a total sampling effort of 44 field days by two re-
searchers.
The climate of the region corresponds to the “Am”
type of Koéppen (1936), with average rainfall of 800 to
1100 mm and a temperature range between 23.5°C and
25°C (Ibge 1997). The mountains have gradients of 300—
800 m of altitude.
Reptiles were sampled through active search (Rodel &
Ernst 2004) at 14 sampling sites in each area, including
12 transects with 50 m length within the forest, a 120 m
transect along a stream and a permanent pond (Fig. 2).
All available microhabitats within five meters left and
right of the transects were sampled (fallen trunks, leaf
litter, vegetation and burrows). Due to increased humid-
ity and high concentration of amphibians at the ponds,
these sites were potentially more prone to reveal forag-
ing snakes. During each field expedition, forest transects
were sampled for 40 minutes and streams were sampled
for 90 minutes. The surroundings of the ponds were
searched for 30 minutes. The total sample effort was 60
hours in each of the areas. Occasional encounters during
the team’s displacement between sample points were
also recorded. Additionally to nocturnal sampling squa-
mate reptiles were also sampled during the day from 14h
to 17h on a 10 km trail leading to the areas where the
transects were located.
The reptiles were collected by hand or using snake
hooks and transferred to cotton bags or plastic boxes. The
license to capture reptiles was issued by ICMBio (num-
ber 13709). Specimens were killed with 20% benzocaine
(1mg/g), fixed in 10% formalin for seven days and stored
in 70% ethanol. They were further identified using orig-
inal descriptions available in the literature and deposited
in “Museu de Zoologia da Universidade Estadual de San-
ta Cruz-MZUESC” (Appendix I).
To evaluate sample efficiency, we constructed a rar-
efaction curve with 1000 randomizations, using the to-
tal number of registered individuals in the study area.
We used abundance data per sample to extrapolate the
richness through the non-parametric estimators Chao2,
Jackknife 1 and 2 and Bootstrap (Magurran 1998; Go-
telli & Colwell 2001). The analyses were made using the
software PAST 3.07 (Paleontological Statistics Software
Package for Education and Data Analysis).
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 85—94
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
During our study we recorded 27 species of Squama-
ta, 21 belonging to snakes and six to lizards (Table 1,
Figs 3-4). Among the snakes, the Dipsadidae family was
represented by 12 species, followed by Colubridae with
four. Regarding lizards only the family Tropiduridae was
represented by two species, while the other families only
had one representative. Of all recorded Squamata, none
is listed in the Brazilian list of threatened taxa (ICM-
Bio-Portaria MMA n° 444/2014 and n° 445/2014).
The comparison with the reptile fauna from surround-
ing areas near Serra do Mandim and Serra Azul is ham-
pered by the absence of such kind of studies. In general,
the recorded squamate fauna (n=27) can be considered
larger than that of other sampled areas in the region,
as some municipalities from the northeast of the state
of Minas Gerais (n=11, Feio & Caramaschi 2002) and
from the APA da Lagoa Encantada, between the cities
of Ihéus, Floresta Azul and Almadina (n=17, Dias et al.
2014). Other studies undertaken in Atlantic Forest areas
revealed larger squamate reptile richness, as the one by
Arg6élo (2004) reporting 61 species of snakes from co-
coa plantations in southeastern Bahia. It is worth men-
tioning that this study was conducted during a time span
of 12 years. Hamdan & Lira-Da-Silva (2012) reported
the occurrence of 30 species of snakes for the seasonal
semi-deciduous Forest of the state of Bahia. We managed
to report 70% of the species reported for this kind of veg-
etation in the state.
Most of the recorded species show a wide distribu-
tion, occurring both in the Atlantic Forest and in the
Caatinga domain, such as Phyllopezus pollicaris, Salva-
tor merianae, Corallus hortulanus, Philodryas olfersii,
Oxyrhopus trigeminus, Pseudoboa nigra and Xenodon
merremii (Vanzolini et al. 1980; Rodrigues 1986; Arg6-
lo 2009; Hamdan & Lira-Da-Silva 2012; Marques et al.
2012c). Others are typical from Caatinga environments,
such as Tropidurus hispidus (Vanzolini et al. 1980; Ro-
drigues 2003) while others are restricted to the Atlantic
Forest domain such as Dipsas sazimai and Echinanthera
cephalostriata. Despite having a wide distribution range
in the Atlantic Forest, D. sazimai has only been reported
thrice from the state of Bahia (Roberto et al. 2014). This
species 1s rare and typical of forest environments and fol-
lowing Fernandes et al. (2010) it should be considered
potentially endangered. Echinanthera cephalostriata can
be found in the Atlantic Forest domain from Santa Cata-
rina to southwestern Bahia state (Argolo & Jesus 2008).
In Bahia, it is considered a rare species, with occurrence
associated with montane forest, above 600m altitude (Ar-
gdlo 2009). These two species (D. sazimai and E. cepha-
lostriata) have been included in the recently launched list
of threatened species of the state of Bahia (SEMA 2017)
as vulnerable (VU) and endangered (EN), respectively.
©ZFMK
Squamates of Serra do Mandim and Serra Azul 89
Table 1. Richness and composition of Squamata species recorded at the Serra do Mandim and at the Serra Azul in southwestern
Bahia, Brazil. Sampling method: OE-opportunistic encounter; FT-Forest transect; P-pond; ST-Stream transect.
*Nomenclature follows Costa & Bérnils (2018).
Family/species* S. Mandim Serra Azul Total
LIZARDS
Phyllodactylidae
Phyllopezus pollicaris (Spix, 1825) — OE 01
Dactyloidae
Norops fuscoauratus (D’ Orbigny,Dumeril & Bibron, 1837) FT — 01
Leiosauridae
Enyalius catenatus (Wied, 1821) FT, ST, OE FT, OE 21
Tropiduridae
Tropidurus torquatus (Wied, 1820) P, OE — 02
Tropidurus hispidus (Spix, 1825) — P 01
Teiidae
Salvator merianae (Dumeéril & Bibron, 1839) — OE 01
SNAKES
Boidae
Corallus hortulanus (Linnaeus, 1758) FT, ST — 02
Colubridae
Chironius fuscus (Linnaeus, 1758) - FT, ST 03
Mastigodryas bifossatus (Raddi, 1820) OE POE 03
Oxybelis aeneus (Wagler in Spix, 1824) ST OE 02
Tantilla melanocephala (Linnaeus, 1758) — OE 03
Dipsadidae
Dipsas sazimai Fernandes, Marques e Argoélo, 2010 FT FT, OE 05
Echinanthera cephalostriata Di-Bernardo, 1996 — FT 02
Erythrolamprus miliaris (Linnaeus, 1758) OE P 02
Erythrolamprus poecilogyrus (Wied, 1825) — OE 03
Imantodes cenchoa (Linnaeus, 1758) - ST, OE 03
Oxyrhopus petolarius (Linnaeus, 1758) - FT 02
Oxyrhopus trigeminus Dumeéril, Bibron e Duméril, 1854 OE PE: 04
Philodryas olfersii (Liechtenstein, 1823) OE — 01
Pseudoboa nigra (Dumeril, Bibron & Dumeril, 1854) - OE 01
Sibynomorphus neuwiedi (Thering, 1911) FT FT 02
Thamnodynastes nattereri (Mikan, 1828) SJ]; OE EL. 04
Xenodon merremii (Wagler in Spix, 1824) OE OE 05
Leptotyphlopidae
Trilepida salgueiroi (Amaral, 1955) — OE 01
Viperidae
Bothrops jararaca (Wied, 1824) PE Sd ET, S17, OE 18
Bothrops leucurus Wagler in Spix, 1824 SL, P2OE P, OE 07
Bothrops bilineatus (Wied-Neuwied, 1821) ST — 02
Total 16 22 102
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 85—94 ©ZFMK
90 Carlos Augusto Souza-Costa et al.
F #
| \
- /
we
! t
> '
“a. —_-
Pow aA m
Fig. 3. Squamata recorded at Serra do Mandim and Serra Azul in southwestern Bahia, Brazil. A. Norops fuscoauratus, B. Enyalius
catenatus (male); C. E. catenatus (juvenile); D. Chironius fuscus; E. Dipsas sazimai;, F. Imantodes cenchoa.
The rarefaction curve did not reach the asymptote and
remained in ascending function (Fig. 5), even though
69% to 86% of the species indicated by the richness es-
timators (Chao 2 = 32.1 + 4.3; Jacknife 1 = 36.2 + 4.2.
Jacknife 2 = 39.2 and Bootstrap = 31.4) were sampled.
However, the use of additional sampling methods as pit-
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 85—94
falls (Cechin & Martins 2000) and funnel traps (Green-
berg et al. 1994) could lead to an increase in the diversity
of sampled Squamata for the region, since they allow the
record of species that have specific habits and are hardly
sampled during active search, such as fossorial snakes
and lizards (Macedo et al. 2008).
©ZFMK
Squamates of Serra do Mandim and Serra Azul
Fig. 4. Squamata recorded at Serra do Mandim and Serra Azul in southwestern Bahia, Brazil. A. Echinanthera cephalostriata,
B. Mastigodryas bifossatus, C. Oxyrhopus trigeminus, D. O. petolarius; E. Oxybelis aeneus, F. Trilepida salgueiroi, G. Bothrops
jararaca, H. B. bilineatus.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 85—94
92 Carlos Augusto Souza-Costa et al.
307
25
20
Number of species
on
10
5
0
25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200
Specimens
Fig. 5. Rarefaction curve based on individuals of Squamata for two regions of semi-deciduous seasonal forest in Serra do Mandim
and Serra Azul in southwestern Bahia, Brazil. The center line corresponds to the mean obtained with 1000 randomizations, and the
lines above and below correspond to the associated standard deviation.
The present study contributes to fill a gap in the knowl-
edge of Squamata of the southwestern region of Bahia,
presenting a list with 27 species of snakes and lizards
for the Serra do Mandim and Serra Azul. Although the
region is suffering great anthropic pressure, mainly re-
lated to the agricultural expansion, the forest remnants
still have conditions to support and maintain species con-
sidered difficult to sample in the Atlantic Forest, such as
Dipsas sazimai and Echinanthera cephalostriata.
Acknowledgements. We thank Cintia de Melo Souto Brige
(in memoriam) and family (Fugiama farm) and José Cord-
eiro de Almeida Filho (in memoriam) and family (Serra Azul
farm) for having allowed the research on their properties.
CASC thanks CAPES-Coordenagéo de Aperfeig¢oamento de
Pessoal de Nivel Superior and FAPESB-Fundacao de Amparo
a Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia, for scholarships. CASC also
thanks Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz and the Programa
de Pos-Graduacéo em Zoologia for support. MS thanks CNPq,
CAPES and the Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung for grants.
IRD is grateful to CNPq-PDJ (CNPq—Project: 406899/2017-7,
Process: 167387/2017-0) for fellowships. CVMM is grateful to
Coordena¢ao de Aperfei¢oamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior
(CAPES) for a fellowship (process PNPD/1682788).
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 85—94
REFERENCES
Argdlo AJS (2004) As serpentes dos cacauais do sudoeste da
Bahia. Editus, Ihéus
Argélo AJS, Jesus JA (2008) Geographic distribution of Echi-
nanthera cephalostriata (Squamata - Snakes). Herpetologi-
cal Review 39 (1): 111
Argdlo AJS (2009) Composi¢ao faunistica e distribuigéo geo-
grafica de serpentes na Mata Atlantica do sul da Bahia, Bra-
sil. PhD thesis, Museu Nacional/ Universidade Federal do
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Barbo FE, Gasparini, JL, Almeida AP, Zaher H, Grazziotin
FG, Gusméo RB, Ferrarini JMG, Sawaya RJ (2016) Anoth-
er new and threatened species of lancehead genus Bothrops
(Serpentes, Viperidae) from Ilha dos Franceses, Southeastern
Brazil. Zootaxa 4097(4): 511-529
Bohm M, Collen B, Baillie JEM, Bowles P, et al. (2013) The
conservation status of the world’s reptiles. Biological Con-
servation 157: 372-385
Cechin SZ, Martins M (2000) Eficiéncia de armadilhas de que-
da (pitfall traps) em amostragem de anfibios e répteis no Bra-
sil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 17(3): 729-740
Costa HC, Bérnils RS (2018) Répteis do Brasil e suas Unidades
Federativas: Lista de espécies. Herpetologia Brasileira 7(1):
11-57
Dias IR, Mira-Mendes CV, Solé M (2014) Rapid inventory of
herpetofauna at the APA (Environmental Protection Area) of
the Lagoa Encantada and Rio Almada, Southern Bahia, Bra-
zil. Herpetology Notes 7: 627-637
©ZFMK
Squamates of Serra do Mandim and Serra Azul 93
Dixo MBO (2001) Efeito da fragmenta¢ao da floresta sobre
a comunidade de sapos e lagartos de serapilheira no sul da
Bahia. Master’s Thesis, Instituto de Biociéncias da Universi-
dade de Sao Paulo, Brazil
Feio RN, Caramschi U (2002) Contribuicaéo ao conhecimento
da herpetofauna do nordeste do estado de Minas Gerais, Bra-
sil. Phyllomedusa 1 (2): 105—111
Fernandes DS, Marques OAV, Argélo AJS (2010) A new spe-
cies of Dipsas Laurenti from the Atlantic Forest of Brazil.
Zootaxa 2691(4): 57-66
Fernandes DS, Hamdan B (2014) A new species of Chironius
Fitzinger, 1826 from the _ state of Bahia, Northeastern Bra-
zil (Serpentes: Colubridae). Zootaxa 3881 (6): 563-575
Freitas MA, Verissimo D, Uhlig V (2012) Squamate Reptiles
of the central Chapada Diamantina, with a focus on the mu-
nicipality of Mucugé, state of Bahia, Brazil. Check List 8
(1): 16-22
Freitas MA (2014) Squamate reptiles of the Atlantic Forest of
northern Bahia, Brazil. Check List 10 (5): 1020-1030
Freitas MA, Colli GR, Entiauspe-Neto OM, Trinchao L, Araujo
D, Lima TO, Franca DPF, Gaiga R, Dias P (2016a) Snakes
of Cerrado localities in western Bahia, Brazil. Check List 12
(3): 1-10
Freitas MA, Entiauspe-Neto OM, Lima TO, Neto JSS, Araujo
D, Silva JMS (2016b). Snakes of Juazeiro, Bahia, Middle of
Sao Francisco River, Brazil. Boletim do Museu de Biologia
Mello Leitéo 38 (4): 331-345
Freitas MA, Abegg AD, Dias IR, Moraes EPF (2018) Herpeto-
fauna from Serra da Jiboia, an Atlantic Rainforest remnant
in the state of Bahia, northeastern Brazil. Herpetology Notes
11: 59-72
Freitas MA, Silva TFS, Fonseca PM, Hamdan B, Filadelfo T,
Abegg AD (2019) Herpetofauna of Serra do Timbo, an Atlan-
tic Forest remnant in Bahia State, northeastern Brazil. Herpe-
tology Notes 12: 245—260
Gibbons JW, Scott DE, Avis TR, Ryan J, Buhlmann KA, Acey
TR, Tuberville D, Metts BS, Greene JL, Mills T, Leiden
Y, Poppy S, Winne CT (2000) The global decline of reptiles,
déja vu amphibians. BioScience 8 (50): 653-666
Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: pro-
cedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of
species richness. Ecology Letters 4 (4): 379-391
Greenberg CH, Neary DG, Harris LD (1994) A comparison of
herpetofaunal sampling effectiveness of pitfall, single-ended,
and double-ended funnel traps used with drift fences. Journal
Herpetological 28 (3): 319-324
Hamdan B, Lira-Da-Silva RM (2012) The snakes of Bahia
State, northeastern Brazil: species richness, composition and
biogeographical notes. Salamandra 48 (1): 31-50
Hamdan B, Fernandes DS (2015) Taxonomic revision of Chi-
ronius flavolineatus (Jan, 1863) with description of a new
species (Serpentes: Colubridae). Zootaxa 4012 (1): 97-119
Ibge (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica) (1997)
Diagnostico Ambiental da Bacia do Rio Jequitinhonha: di-
retrizes gerais para a ordenacAo territorial. Diretoria de Geo-
ciéncias, 1* Divisio de Geociéncias do Nordeste-DIGEO 1/
NE.1. Salvador: 64 pp.
ICMBio (Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservacao da Biodi-
versidade) (2014) Lista de Espécies Ameacadas. Online at
http://www. icmbio. gov. br/portal/especies-ameacadas-desta-
que [last accessed on 22 Feb. 2017)]
Koppen WP (1936) Das geographische System der Klimate.
Gebrtider Borntraeger, Berlin
Macedo LM, Bernarde PS, Abe AS (2008) Lagartos (Squamata:
Lacertilia) em areas de floresta e de pastagem em Espigao do
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 85—94
Oeste, Rond6nia, sudoeste da Amazonia, Brasil. Biota Neo-
tropica 8(1): 133-139
Magurran AE (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement.
Princeton University Press, New Jersey
Marques R, Browne-Ribeiro HC, Tindco MS, Fazolato CP,
Coelho HEA, Amorim R (2012) Corallus hortulanus (Ama-
zon Tree Boa): Geographic distribution. Herpetological Re-
view 43 (3): 448
Marques R, Mebert K, Fonseca E, Rédder D, Solé M, Tino-
co MS (2016) Composition and natural history notes of
the coastal snake assemblage from Northern Bahia, Brazil.
ZooKeys 611: 93-142
Pinto LPS, Bede L (2006) Biodiversidade e Conserva¢aéo nos
Vales dos Rios Jequitinhonha e Mucuri. Brasilia. Ministério
do Meio Ambiente, Brasilia
Recoder RS, Werneck FP, Teixeira Jr M, Colli GR, Sites JW,
Rodrigues MT (2014) Geographic variation and systematic
review of the lizard genus Vanzosaura (Squamata, Gym-
nophthalmidae), with the description of a new species. Zoo-
logical Journal of the Linnean Society 171 (1): 206-225
Roberto IJ, Oliveira CR, Araujo-Filho JA, Avila RW, Marques
F, Argélo AJS (2014) Dipsas sazimai (Squamata: Dipsadi-
dae): Distribution extension and new State record. Check
List 10 (1): 209-210
R6édel MO, Ernst R (2004) Measuring and monitoring amphib-
ian diversity in tropical forests. I. An evaluation of methods
with recommendations for standardization. Ecotropica 10
(1): 1-14
Rodrigues MT (1986) Uma nova espécie do género Phyllope-
zus de Cabaceiras: Paraiba: Brasil, com comentarios sobre a
fauna de lagartos da area (Sauria Gekkonidae). Papéis Avul-
sos de Zoologia 36 (20): 237—250
Rodrigues MT (2003) Herpetofauna da Caatinga. Pp. 181—236
in: Leal IR, Tabarelli M, Silva JMC (eds) Ecologia e conser-
vacao da Caatinga. Editora Universitaria da UFPE, Recife
Rodrigues MT (2005) Conservacado dos répteis brasileiros: os
desafios para um pais megadiverso. Megadiversidade 1 (1):
87-94
Rodrigues MT, Recoder R, Teixeira Jr M, Roscito JG, Guerrero
AC, Nunes PMS, Freitas MA, Fernandes DS, Bocchiglieri A,
Dal Vechio F, Leite FSF, Nogueira CC, Damasceno R, Pelle-
grino KCM, Argélo AJS, Amaro RC (2017) A morphological
and molecular study of Psilops, a replacement name for the
Brazilian microteiid lizard genus Psilophthalmus Rodrigues
1991 (Squamata, Gymnophthalmidae), with the description
of two new species. Zootaxa 4286 (4): 451-482
Salino A, Stehmann JR, Lombard JA, Mota RC, Carvalho
FA, Mota NFO (2006) Flora das Areas Prioritarias dos Rios
Jequitinhonha e Mucuri. Pp. 36—92 in: Pinto LPS & Bede L
(org) Biodiversidade e Conservacdo nos Vales dos Rios Je-
quitinhonha e Mucuri. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Bra-
silia
SEMA (Secretaria de Meio Ambiente do Estado da Bahia)
(2017) Lista Oficial das Espécies da Fauna Ameagadas de
Extincao do Estado da Bahia — Portaria n° 37/2017. Online
at — http://(www.ceama.mp.ba.gov.br/biblioteca-virtual-cea-
ma/doc_view/3977-portaria-n-37-de-15-de-agosto-de-2017.
html [last accessed 23 Jan. 2018]
Silva MB, Ribeiro-Junior MA, Avila-Pires TCS (2018) A New
Species of Tupinambis Daudin, 1802 (Squamata: Teiidae)
from Central South America. Journal of Herpetology 52 (1):
94-110
Silveira SRA, Santos-Jr AP (2018) A New Species of Lepos-
ternon (Squamata: Amphisbaenidae) from Brazilian Cerrado
©ZFMK
94 Carlos Augusto Souza-Costa et al.
with a key to pored species. Journal of Herpetology 52 (1):
50-58
Vanzolini PE, Ramos-Costa AMM, Vitt LJ (1980) Répteis das
Caatingas. Academia Brasileira de Ciéncias, Rio de Janeiro.
APPENDIX I.
Uetz P, Freed P, Hosek J (1995) The Reptile Database. Online at
http://www. reptile-database.org [last accessed 30 Sept. 2019]
List of vouchers deposited in the Museu de Zoologia da Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz-MZUESC.
LIZARDS
PHYLLODACTYLIDAE. Phyllopezus pollicaris: MZU-
ESC 15911. DACTYLOIDAE. Norops fuscoauratus:
MZUESC 15931. LEIOSAURIDAE. Enyalius catenatus:
MZUESC 15901-15906, 15916, 15917, 15920, 15921,
15922, 15930. TROPIDURIDAE. Tropidurus torquatus:
MZUESC 15939, 15942. Tropidurus hispidus: MZUESC
16546.
SNAKES
BOIDAE. Corallus hortulanus. MZUESC 15929. COL-
UBRIDAE. Chironius fuscus: MZUESC 15934, 15935.
Mastigodryas bifossatus. MZUESC 16541. Oxybelis
aeneus: MZUESC 15910, 15919. Tantilla melanoceph-
ala. MZUESC 15924, 15943, 16538. DIPSADIDAE.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 85—94
Dipsas sazimai: MZUESC 15908, 15913, 15926, 16548.
Echinanthera cephalostriata. MZUESC 15909, 15928.
Erythrolamprus miliaris. MZUESC 15907, 15940.
Erythrolamprus poecilogyrus: MZUESC 15944, 16540,
16543. Imantodes cenchoa: MZUESC 15914. Oxy-
rhopus petolarius. MZUESC 15945, 16544. Oxyrhopus
trigeminus: MZUESC 14687, 15923. Philodryas olfersi:
MZUESC 16547. Pseudoboa nigra: MZUESC 16537.
Sibynomorphus neuwiedi. MZUESC_ 15927, 15932.
Thamnodynastes nattereri: MZUESC 15912, 15933.
Xenodon merremii. MZUESC 16534-16536, 16539,
16542. LEPTOTYPHLOPIDAE. Trilepida_ salgueiroi:
MZUESC_ 16545. VIPERIDAE. Bothrops jararaca:
MZUESC 14469, 14470, 14471, 15915, 15918, 15936,
15937. Bothrops leucurus. MZUESC 15925, 15938.
Bothrops bilineatus: MZUESC 16549.
©ZFMK
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 95—103
2020 - Trela J. et al.
https://do1.org/10.20363/BZB-2020.69.1.095
ISSN 2190-7307
http://www.zoologicalbulletin.de
Research article
urn:Isid:zoobank.org: pub: D821 9FBF-35E6-4791-9EC5-519120C3B543
Sexual morphs of the three native Nearctic species
of the genus Periphyllus van der Hoeven, 1863
(Insecta: Hemiptera: Aphididae),
with identification keys including introduced species
Joanna Trela', Lukasz Junkiert? & Karina Wieczorek>*
'23 Institute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Natural Sciences,
University of Silesia in Katowice, Bankowa 9, PL-40-007 Katowice, Poland
“Corresponding author: Email: karina.wieczorek@us.edu.pl
'urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:7 DD6940F-70E6-4CEC-833C-D852E329F43 1
2urn:Isid:zoobank.org:author: AF78807C-2115-4A33-AD65-9190DA612FB9
3urn:Isid:zoobank.org:author:95A5CB92-EB7B-4132-A04E-6163503ED8C2
Abstract. Periphyllus van der Hoeven, 1863 (Hemiptera: Aphididae: Chaitophorinae) is a Holarctic genus, with just three
species native to Nearctic: Periphyllus americanus (Baker, 1917), P. brevispinosus Gillette & Palmer, 1930, and P. negun-
dinis (Thomas, 1878). Males and oviparous females of P. brevispinosus and P. negundinis and males of P. americanus are
described. Original keys to the identification of the known native and non-native sexual morphs of this genus, associated
with maples in the Nearctic Region, are given.
Key words. Aphids, distribution, maple, sexuales.
INTRODUCTION
Periphyllus americanus (Baker, 1917) (American Maple
Aphid), P. brevispinosus Gillette & Palmer, 1930 (Col-
orado Maple Aphid) and P. negundinis (Thomas, 1878)
(Boxelder Aphid) are the only Nearctic species within
the genus Periphyllus van der Hoeven, 1863 (Hemiptera:
Aphididae: Chaitophorinae) (Blackman & Eastop 2019).
Apterous and alate viviparous females of these species
were extensively collected, described and reported by
entomologists throughout the United States and Canada
(Gillette & Palmer 1930; Knowlton 1947; Essig & Ab-
ernathy 1952; Palmer 1952; Richards 1972). However,
the sexual morphs of these species seem to be extremely
rarely collected and their detailed description is still lack-
ing (Blackman & Eastop 2019). In particular, the male
of P. americanus was shortly described, as P. palmerae
Knowlton, 1947, the oviparous female of P. brevispino-
sus Was mentioned by Palmer (1952), whereas the brief
description of sexuales of P. negundinis was provided by
Essig and Abernathy (1952).
In the present study, based on the specimens deposited
in the Natural History Museum, London, UK, we re-de-
scribe or describe all known sexuales of Nearctic species
of the genus Periphyllus, except the oviparous female of
P. americanus, which remains unknown. In addition to
Received: 11.01.2020
Accepted: 30.03.2020
these three native species, three non-indigenous species
of the genus Periphyllus are also distributed in North
America: P. californiensis (Shinji, 1917), P. lyropictus
(Kessler, 1886), and P. testudinaceus (Fernie, 1852). Ac-
cording to Foottit et al. (2006), although P. aceris (Lin-
naeus, 1761) has been recorded by numerous authors as
introduced to North America, it seems that those records
refer to other species. As Periphyllus is a highly polymor-
phic genus, we provide original keys to differentiate all
known sexuales of native and non-native species of this
genus, associated with maples in North America.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The specimens were examined using a Nikon Ni-U light
microscope equipped with a phase contrast system. The
drawings of the morphological details were done free-
hand on a Nikon Ni-U light microscope using a camera
lucida. In each drawing, the left side represents dorsal
view and the right side represents ventral view. On the
dorsal side only dorsal setae are shown and on the ventral
side only ventral setae are shown.
The measurements were done according to Black-
man & Eastop (2019).
Corresponding editor: X. Mengual
Published: 19.04.2020
96 Joanna Trela et al.
Abbreviations for morphological terms
BL = body length (from anterior border of
the head to the posterior border of anal
plate)
BW = greatest body width across middle of
abdomen
ANT = antenna or its length
ANTI-VI = antennal segments I-VI or their lengths
(ratios between antennal segments are
simply given as e.g., ‘VI-III’)
LSANTII = length of longest seta of ANT II
BD Il = basal articular diameter of ANT III
BASE = basal part of the last antennal segment
or its length
PT = processus terminalis of the last
antennal segment or its length
ARS = apical segment of rostrum or its length
FEMORA III = hind femora length
TIBIA III = hind tibia length
HT II = second segment of hind tarsus or its
length
ABD I-VIII_ = abdominal tergites I-VIII
Institutional abbreviations
NHMUK = Natural History Museum, London, UK
RESULTS
Periphyllus americanus (Baker, 1917)
Baker, 1917: 428
Fig. 1
This species 1s widely distributed in the United States
and Canada on several species of maples (Blackman &
Eastop 2019). Specifically, it is known in Colorado, Con-
necticut, Florida, Idaho, Maine, Massachusetts, New
York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Utah, Washington
and Wyoming (USA), and in British Columbia, New
Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Quebec (Canada) and its
recorded host plants are Acer floridanum, A. glabrum,
A. grandidentatum, A. pseudoplatanus, A. saccharinum,
A. saccharum (Essig & Abernathy 1952; Palmer 1952;
Richards 1972; Smith & Parron 1978; Knowlton 1983).
Material examined. UNITED STATES, Utah, Ogden,
19 October 1958, G. F. Knowlton leg., 1 alate male.
Alate male (Fig. 1). Colour in life: unknown; mounted
specimens with head, antennae, pronotum, sclerites, si-
phunculi and genitalia dark. Legs dark with basal part of
femur slightly paler. Body 2.92 mm long and 1.02 mm
width. Head with 4—6 pairs of long fine, pointed setae
0.16—0.22 mm long (Fig. la). ANT 6-segmented, 2.12—
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 95—103
2.15 mm long (Fig. 1b), reaching ABD VI, 0.71-0.73 x
BL. ANT IV 1.50—-1.56 ANT V; ANT V always short-
er than ANT VI; PT 2.76—-3.00 x BASE; other antennal
ratios: VI:IIT 0.70-0.71, V:I 0.47—-0.48, IV:II 0.72-
0.74. ANT I with 4-8 setae, ANT II with 3-4 setae,
ANT III 0.67—0.70 mm long with 11-13 setae (7-8 long
pointed setae and 4—S thick pointed setae), ANT IV 0.50—
0.51 mm long with 5—6 setae (3-4 long pointed setae and
1—2 thick pointed setae), ANT V 0.32-0.34 mm long
with | setae, BASE 0.12—0.13 mm long with 2 setae, PT
0.36 mm long with 3 apical setae. ANT setae: fine, point-
ed, up to 0.1 mm long; thick, pointed up to 0.025 mm
long. ANT III setae 0.01-0.10 mm long. LS ANT III
2.5 x BD III. The whole ANT III—V covered by rounded
secondary rhinaria: ANT HI with 59-63 rhinaria, ANT
IV with 18-32 rhinaria, ANT V with 8 rhinaria. Rostrum
reaching hind coxae. ARS 0.13 mm long, 0.18-0.19 x
ANT III and 0.76—0.81 x HT II, with 4 accessory setae
(Fig. 1c). Legs with numerous, fine and pointed setae,
0.05—0.23 mm long. FEMORA III 0.90 mm long. TIBIA
II 1.30 mm long with numerous short spinules distributed
on distal 1/3 of tibiae. HT IH 0.16—0.17 mm long. Empo-
dial setae spatulate; first tarsal chaetotaxy 5:5:5 (Fig. 1d).
Fore wings with normal venation (Fig. le). Abdominal
tergites membranous, with large fused spinal sclerites,
pleural sclerites very small, irregularly placed, marginal
sclerites oval. Abdominal setae 0.07—0.22 mm long; mar-
ginal sclerites with 4—5 setae (0.1—0.2 mm long), pleu-
ral sclerites with 0-1 setae (0.11-0.17 mm long), spinal
sclerites with 4-5 setae (0.07—0.22 mm long) (Fig. 1f).
Siphunculi 0.17 mm long and 0.18—0.19 width, truncate,
reticulated on the whole length, with developed flange
and coalescent with each marginal sclerite of ABD VI
(Fig. 1g). Cauda 0.08 mm long, broadly rounded, with
8 setae (4 long and 4 short setae) 0.06—-0.13 mm long
(Fig. 1h). Genitalia well developed, strongly sclerotized
with roundish, lobate parameres, covered by numerous
spine—like setae. Basal part of phallus rectangular, short-
ened, with numerous short spinules (Fig. 11).
Periphyllus brevispinosus (Gillette & Palmer, 1930)
Gillette & Palmer, 1930: 546-547
Figs 2-3
This species 1s known western North America on Acer
glabrum (Blackman & Eastop 2019); specifically, it has
been recorded from Colorado, Idaho, Oregon, Utah,
Washington, and Wyoming (USA) and Alberta and Brit-
ish Columbia (Canada) (Essig & Abernathy 1952; Palm-
er 1952; Richards 1972; Smith & Parron 1978; Knowlton
1983).
Material examined. UNITED STATES, Colorado, Sky-
way, 15 September 1956, on Acer glabrum, Hottes &
H.R.L. leg., 2 alate males, 4 oviparous females, BM 1984
340.
©ZFMK
Sexuales of Nearctic species of Periphyllus 97
Alate male (Fig. 2). Colour in life: unknown; mount-
ed specimens with head, pronotum, sclerites, siphun-
culi and genitalia dark. Legs light dark with basal part
of femur and middle part of tibiae slightly paler. ANT
I-VI dark with ANT III-IV slightly paler at base. Body
2.25—2.37 mm long and 0.80—0.87 mm width. Head with
1mm
0.1 mm
4—6 pairs of long fine, pointed setae 0.09—-0.16 mm long
(Fig. 2a). ANT 6-segmented, 2.00 mm long (Fig. 2b),
almost reaching ABD VI, about 0.84 x BL. ANT IV
1.30-1.40 ANT V; ANT V about as long as ANT VI; PT
2.30-2.41 x BASE; other antennal ratios: VI:III 0.62—
0.65, V:III 0.45—0.49, IV:IIT 0.65—0.69. ANT I with 7 se-
Fig. 1. Periphyllus americanus (Baker, 1917), alate male. a. Head. b. Antenna. c. Apical segment of rostrum. d. Hind tarsus. e. Fore
wing. f. Abdomen. g. Siphunculus. h. Cauda. i. Genitalia.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 95—103
©ZFMK
98 Joanna Trela et al.
tae, ANT II with 7 setae, ANT III 0.63—0.69 mm log with
7-10 setae, ANT IV 0.41-0.48 mm long with 5-7 setae,
ANT V 0.31-0.34 mm long with 3—5 setae, BASE 0.12—
0.13 mm long with 2 setae, PT 0.29-0.30 mm long with
3 apical setae. ANT setae fine, pointed, 0.03—0.07 mm
long. LS ANT III 1.75—2.33 x BD HI. The whole ANT
1mm
III—V covered by rounded secondary rhinaria: ANT III
with 25—43 rhinaria, ANT IV with 13—23 rhinaria, ANT
V with 13-18 rhinaria. Rostrum reaching middle coxae.
ARS 0.11 mm long, 0.15—0.17 x ANT HI and 0.64—0.68 x
HT I, with 4 accessory setae (Fig. 2c). Legs with nu-
merous fine and pointed setae 0.02—0.09 mm long. FEM-
Fig. 2. Periphyllus brevispinosus Gillette & Palmer, 1930, alate male. a. Head. b. Antenna. ec. Apical segment of rostrum. d. Hind
tarsus. e. Fore wing. f. Abdomen. g. Siphunculus. h. Cauda. i. Genitalia.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 95—103
©ZFMK
Sexuales of Nearctic species of Periphyllus 99
ORA II 0.73-0.77 mm long. TIBIA III 1.02—1.05 mm __ with large fused spinal sclerites, pleural sclerites very
long. HT II 0.16-0.17 mm long. Distal part of tibiae small, irregularly placed, marginal sclerites oval; scler-
with many short spinules; empodial setae spatulate; first 1tes on ABD VII—VIII fused in cross bars. Abdominal
tarsal chaetotaxy 5:5:5 (Fig. 2d). Fore wings with nor- — setae 0.06—0.18 mm long; marginal sclerites with 2—5
mal venation (Fig. 2e). Abdominal tergites membranous, — setae (0.09-0.18 mm long), pleural sclerites with 0-1
Fig. 3. Periphyllus brevispinosus Gillette & Palmer, 1930, oviparous female. a. General view. b. Antenna. c. Apical segment of
rostrum. d. Hind tibia with pseudosensoria and tarsus. e. Siphunculus. f. Cauda.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 95—103 ©ZFMK
100 Joanna Trela et al.
setae (0.07-0.13 mm long), spinal sclerites with 2-3
(0.06—0.17 mm long) setae. Siphunculi 0.11-0.13 mm
long and 0.11 width, truncate with developed flange, re-
ticulated, except at base where reticulation transforms
into flattened cells and coalescent with each marginal
sclerite of ABD VI (Fig. 2g). Cauda 0.06—0.07 mm long,
broadly rounded, with 14-15 setae 0.05—0.10 mm long
(Fig. 2h). Genitalia well developed, strongly sclerotized
with roundish, lobate parameres, covered by numerous
spine—like setae. Basal part of phallus triangular, short-
ened, with numerous short spinules (Fig. 21).
Oviparous female (Fig. 3). Colour in life: unknown;
mounted specimens with head, legs, scleroites and si-
phunculi dusky. ANT dusky with apices of ANT III-V
and ANT VI dark. Body 2.32—2.60 mm long and 1.40-—
1.55 mm width, pear-shaped (Fig. 3a). Head with 4 pairs
of fine, pointed setae 0.06—0.19 mm long. ANT 6-seg-
mented, 1.27—1.40 mm long (Fig. 3b), reaching ABD
I-IV, 0.48-0.59 x BL. ANT IV 1.20-1.56 ANT V; ANT
V always shorter than ANT VI; PT 0.92-1.16 x BASE;
other antennal ratios: VI:III 0.54—0.67, V:III 0.35—0.50,
IV: 0.50-0.65. ANT I with 4-8 setae, ANT II with 3-5
setae, ANT III 0.40-0.48 mm long with 7—9 setae, ANT
IV 0.24—-0.28 mm long with 3-6 setae, ANT V 0.16—
0.20 mm long with 34 setae, BASE 0.12—0.14 mm long
with 2 setae, PT 0.13—0.15 mm long with 3 apical setae.
ANT setae fine, pointed, 0.03—0.07 mm long. LS ANT III
1.25—2.33 x BD II. Rostrum almost reaching hind cox-
ae. ARS 0.10-0.11 mm long, 0.20-0.25 x ANT HI and
0.66—0.76 x HT II with 4 accessory setae (Fig. 3c). Legs
with numerous fine and pointed setae, 0.03—0.10 mm
long. FEMORA II 0.39-0.59 mm long. TIBIA HI 0.70—
0.80 mm long. HT II 0.13—0.16 mm long. Hind tibiae
with 69-150 8-shaped pseudosensoria distributed on the
whole length of tibiae. Distal part of tibiae with few short
spinules; empodial setae spatulate; first tarsal chaeto-
taxy 5:5:5 (Fig. 3d). Abdominal tergites membranous.
Abdominal setae 0.05—0.20 mm long; marginal sclerites
with 2—5 setae (0.05—0.20 mm long), pleural and spinal
sclerites with 3 setae (0.05—0.15 mm long). Siphunculi
0.11—0.12 mm long and 0.12—0.13 mm width, truncate,
with weakly visible 2—3 rows of reticulations which at
base transform into flattened cells and well-developed
flange (Fig. 3e). Cauda 0.09-0.10 mm long, broadly
rounded, with 20-25 pointed setae (Fig. 3f).
Periphyllus negundinis (Thomas, 1878)
Thomas, 1878: 10
Figs 4-5
Periphyllus negundinis is the most widely distributed in
North America among Nearctic species of Periphyllus
(Blackman & Eastop 2019); it has been recorded from
Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut,
Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Illinois, Indiana,
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 95—103
Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan,
Minnesota, Missouri, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska,
New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina,
North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Car-
olina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington,
West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming (USA); Alberta,
British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Nova Sco-
tia, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, Quebec and Saskatch-
ewan (Canada) and Mexico (Mexico), being its main host
plants Acer negundo (Essig & Abernathy 1952; Palmer
1952; Richards 1972; Smith & Parron 1978; Knowlton
1983); also collected from A. pseudoplatanus (Palmer
1952).
Material examined. CANADA, Manitoba, Winnipeg,
25 September 1963, on Acer negundo, A. G. Robinson
leg., 1 oviparous female, BM 1964 630; 1 October 1964,
on Acer negundo, A. G. Robinson leg., 2 apterous males,
BM 1965 33.
Apterous male (Fig. 4). Colour in life: dark green (Es-
sig & Abernathy 1952); mounted specimens with body
pale with dusky sclerites; head, pronotum and genitalia
dark. Antennae dark with basal part of ANT III paler.
Legs dark with basal part of femora slightly paler. Body
1.60-1.72 mm long and 0.82-0.85 mm width. Head
with 6—8 pairs of long fine, pointed setae 0.10—-0.13 mm
long (Fig. 4a). ANT 6-segmented, 1.20—1.27 mm long
(Fig. 4b), reaching ABD IV, 0.70-0.79 x BL. ANT IV
the same or slightly longer than ANT V; ANT V always
shorter than ANT VI; PT 1.81—2.20 x BASE; other an-
tennal ratios: VIII 0.70—0.83, V:HI 0.51—0.55, IV:HI
0.54—0.72. ANT I with 4-5 setae, ANT I with 3-4 se-
tae, ANT III 0.35—0.36 mm long with 7-8 setae, ANT
IV 0.19-0.26 mm long with 3-4 setae, ANT V 0.18—
0.20 mm long with 2-3 setae, BASE 0.09-0.11 mm long
with 2 setae, PT 0.19—0.20 mm long with 3 apical setae.
ANT setae fine, pointed, 0.02—0.13 mm long. LS ANT
Il 3.25-4.00 x BD II. The whole ANT HJ—V covered
by rounded secondary rhinaria: ANT III with 16—23 rhi-
naria, ANT IV with 6-11 rhinaria, ANT V with 3—4 rhi-
naria. Rostrum reaching hind coxae. ARS 0.12—0.13 mm
long, 0.34—0.36 x ANT III and 0.75-0.76 x HT I, with
4 accessory setae (Fig. 4c). Legs with numerous fine and
pointed setae 0.06—0.16 mm long. FEMORA III 0.57—
0.58 mm long. TIBIA II 0.77-0.81 mm long. HT II
0.16-0.17 mm long. Distal part of tibiae with few short
spinules; empodial setae spatulate; first tarsal chaetotaxy
5:5:5 (Fig. 4d). Abdominal tergites membranous, with
large, fused spinal sclerites, pleural sclerites smaller than
spinal, irregularly placed, fused, marginal sclerites oval.
Abdominal setae 0.03—0.21 mm long; marginal sclerites
with 4-7 setae (0.03—0.21 mm long), pleural sclerites
with 1-3 setae (0.08—0.15 mm long), spinal sclerites with
2-6 setae (0.07-0.14 mm long) (Fig. 4a). Siphunculi
©ZFMK
Sexuales of Nearctic species of Periphyllus 101
0.17—0.18 mm long and 0.07—0.12 mm width, stump—
shaped with 2 rows of reticulation and developed flange
(Fig. 4e). Cauda 0.04—0.05 mm long, broadly rounded,
with 10 setae (Fig. 4f). Genitalia well developed, strong-
ly sclerotized with roundish, lobate parameres, covered
by numerous spine—like setae. Basal part of phallus
hook—shaped, shortened, with numerous short spinules
(Fig. 4g).
Oviparous female (Fig. 5). Colour in life: mottled green,
becoming darker as eggs mature within body (Essig &
Abernathy 1952); mounted specimens with body pale
with apices of ANT IV—V, ANT VI, tarsi and HTII dark.
Body 2.55 mm long and 1.20 mm width, egg-shaped
(Fig. 5a). Head with 5-7 pairs of fine, pointed setae 0.12—
0.20 mm long. ANT 6-segmented 1.30-1.35 mm long
(Fig. 5b), reaching ABD HI-IV, 0.50—0.52 x BL. ANT IV
slightly longer than ANT V; ANT V always shorter than
ANT VI; PT 2.27 x BASE; other antennal ratios: VI-III
0.58-0.69, V:IIT 0.55—0.61, [V:III 0.58—0.69. ANT I with
6-8 setae, ANT II with 4—5 setae, ANT III 0.36 mm long
with 8-10 setae, ANT IV 0.21—0.25 mm long with 3-4
0.2 mm
0.1 mm
0.1 mm
Fig. 4. Periphyllus negundinis (Thomas, 1878), apterous male. a. General view. b. Antenna. c. Apical segment of rostrum. d. Hind
tarsus. e. Siphunculus. f. Cauda. g. Genitalia.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 95—103
©ZFMK
102 Joanna Trela et al.
setae, ANT V 0.20—-0.22 mm long with 3-4 setae, BASE
0.11 mm long with 2 setae, PT 0.25 mm long with 3 api-
cal setae. ANT setae fine, pointed, 0.02—0.12 mm long.
LS ANT III 3 x BD III. Rostrum reaching middle coxae.
ARS 0.13 mm long, 0.36 x ANT HI and 0.72—0.76 x HT
II with 4 accessory setae (Fig. 5c). FEMORA TI 0.64 mm
long. TIBIA III 0.89-0.90 mm long. HT II 0.17—0.18 mm
long Legs with numerous fine and pointed setae 0.04—
0.15 mm long. Hind tibiae with 120-130 rounded pseu-
dosensoria, sometimes fused and distributed on the whole
ET
Vy Vis rf
0.1mm
length of tibiae except basal and distal part. Distal part of
tibiae with few short spinules; empodial setae spatulate;
first tarsal chaetotaxy 5:5:5 (Fig. 5d). Abdominal tergites
membranous. Abdominal setae numerous, fine, regularly
placed all over abdomen, 0.06—0.22 mm long. Siphunculi
0.10 mm long and 0.15—0.16 mm width, stump-shaped,
with 3-4 rows of reticulations and well-developed flange
(Fig. 5e). Cauda 0.08 mm long broadly rounded, with 12
setae 0.05—0.15 mm long (Fig. 5f).
Fig. 5. Periphyllus negundinis (Thomas, 1878), oviparous female. a. General view. b. Antenna. ec. Apical segment of rostrum. d.
Hind tibia with pseudosensoria and tarsus. e. Siphunculus. f. Cauda.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 95—103
©ZFMK
Sexuales of Nearctic species of Periphyllus 103
Key to males of species of Periphyllus (native and in-
troduced) known from the Nearctic
Dee FAMCIOUS: 2.20 ese bern. cine ARAN P. negundinis
Sie PV ATC oct canst lescsta Mets tate eek are alae, onsh ee ssa ace 2
2). SHind tibiag-unitornily darker. -! fe ea tape ecdee 3
— Hind tibiae pale, dusky or dark only on base and
PCE), An te BN oe thee A i ers 2 ole 4
3. Siphunculi reticulated on the whole length, PT 2.76—
SEUOU SAS LM A Boneh Mh a) P. americanus
— Siphunculi reticulated on apical 2/3, imbricated to
wider base, PT > 3.0 x BASE ........ P. californiensis
4. Hind tibiae pale or dusky. Cauda helmet-shaped .....
0. seme nied Le TaN aoe M9), ow P. lyropictus
— Hind tibiae dark on base and apex, pale at middle part.
Cauda broadly-rounded ..0.......0.0000ccccecceeeeeeeeees 5
5. PT 2.30-2.41 x BASE ........0. P. brevispinosus
— PT 5.70—5.90 x BASE .........0..0000.. P. testudinaceus
Key to oviparous females of the species of Periphyllus
(native and introduced) known from the Nearctic
1. Cauda helmet-shaped .......000..000000000.. P. lyropictus
— Cauda broadly rounded ............00c ccc eeeeeeeee 2
Ye 2A POSS ae 27 61 UNAS 6 V2 hed BAe rene seer ne ee me 3
— PT 3.00—3.50 x BASE ........00...000. P. testudinaceus
3. Body pear-shaped and dusky with dark ANT VI and
apices of ANT IN-V ..........00 ce. P. brevispinosus
— Body egg-shaped and pale with dark tarsi, hind
tibiae, ANT VI, and apices of ANT IV-V .............. 4
4. Siphunculi pale. On Acer negundo or
A, pSCudloplatanus ........0ccc cece cess P. negundinis
— Siphunculi dark. On Asian ornamental maples ........
Rac NectacnssacarranceneM dace, caste #eonra ane Mad ata 44.524, P. californiensis
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 95—103
Acknowledgements. We would like to express our thanks to
Jon Martin and Paul A. Brown, the Natural History Museum,
London, UK for the loan of the slides and for all of their help
during the visit to the collection of the NHMUK. We are also
grateful to the Editor and to the two anonymous reviewers for
all valuable comments during the review process.
REFERENCES
Baker AC (1917) Eastern aphids, new or little known. Journal
of Economic Entomology 10: 420-433
Blackman RL, Eastop VF (2019) Aphids on the World’s Plants:
An Identification and Information Guide. Online at http://
www.aphidsonworldsplants.info/ [last accessed on Decem-
ber 20, 2019]
Essig EO, Abernathy F (1952) The Aphid Genus Periphyllus. A
Systematic, Biological and Ecological Study. University of
California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 166 pp.
Foottit RG, Halbert SE, Miller GL, Maw E, Russell MN (2006)
Adventive aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) of America North
of Mexico. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of
Washington 108 (3): 583-610
Gillette CP, Palmer MA (1930) Three new aphids from Colo-
rado. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 23:
543-551
Knowlton CF (1947) A new maple aphid from Utah and some
aphid records. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society
20 (1): 24-26
Knowlton CF (1983) Aphids of Utah. Research Bulletin 509:
1-153
Palmer MS (1952) Aphids of the Rocky Mountain Region.
Thomas Say Foundation. The A. B. Hirschfeld Press, 452 pp.
Richards WR (1972) The Chaitophorinae of Canada (Homop-
tera: Aphididae). Memoirs of the Entomological Society of
Canada 87: 1-109
Smith CF, Parron CS (1978) An annotated list of Aphididae
(Homoptera) of North America. North Carolina Agricultural
Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 255: 428 pp.
Thomas C (1878) A list of species of the tribe Aphidini, family
Aphididae, found in the United States which have been here-
tofore named, with descriptions of some new species. Bulle-
tin of the Illinois State Laboratory of Natural History 1: 3-16
©ZFMK
BHL
i
Blank Page Digitally Inserted
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 105-110
2020 - Al-Sheikhly O.F. et al.
https://do1.org/10.20363/BZB-2020.69.1.105
ISSN 2190-7307
http://www.zoologicalbulletin.de
Scientific note
urn:|sid:zoobank.org:pub: CDO9EF99-49F6-48DD-B 132-5567EBF50815
New distribution range of the vulnerable wild goat
(Capra aegagrus Erxleben, 1777) (Artiodactyla: Bovidae)
to the south of its known extant in Iraq, with notes on its conservation
Omar F. Al-Sheikhly” *, Mukhtar K. Haba’, Ali N. Al-Barazengy* & Nadheer A. Fazaa‘*
' Department of Biology, College of Science, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
?4Department of Biology, College of Science for Women, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
>Center of Sustainable Management for Natural Ecosystem, Iraqi Ministry of Environment, Baghdad, Iraq
“Corresponding author: Email: alsheikhlyomar@gmail.com
'urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:D8ADSFEE-E7FC-4E0C-8256-4B5E84AFC238
> urn:|sid:zoobank.org:author:C6B7D8FD-A9F6-48C0-89F0-34 1 8FEEDC969
3urn:Isid:zoobank.org:author:6B33B3E3-8A91-48D1-AB13-88A82B5A0FC1
*urn:Isid:zoobank.org:author:2F5EA9F7-COF8-4A0D-99CC-2D9 1 ESEEFEF9
Abstract. The wild goat (Capra aegagrus Erxleben, 1777) is a vulnerable ungulate confined to the rocky slopes of the
Zagros Mountains forest steppes ecoregion in northern and northeastern Iraq (Kurdistan Region). Scattered populations
had been reported from 31 sites distributed mainly in four Iraqi northern provinces; however, the species’ current zoogeo-
graphical distribution and population trends are enigmatic. From August 2017 to April 2018, four new sightings of the
wild goat were obtained from the foothills of the Zagros Mountains along the eastern and southeastern Iraq-Iran internati-
onal borders. These new localities represent a new distribution range to the southernmost of the species’ known extant in
Iraq. Moreover, the newly discovered wild goat populations in eastern and southeastern Iraq almost certainly originated
from the western Iranian populations assigned to the Capra a. aegagrus subspecies. Besides poaching, newly documented
threats such as trapping and young capturing which severely affect the wild goat populations in Iraq are discussed.
Key words. Bovidae, Capra aegagrus, protected areas, ungulates, wild mammals of Iraq.
INTRODUCTION
The wild goat (Capra aegagrus Erxleben, 1777) is a
threatened ungulate restricted to the mountainous habitats
of central Afghanistan, southern Pakistan, west through
Iran, western Turkmenistan, northern Irag, the Caucasus
region (Armenia, Azerbaijan, northeastern Georgia, and
southern Russia), and southwestern Turkey (Weinberg
et al. 2008; Macar & Gurkan 2009). In Arabia, the spe-
cies once occurred in Lebanon and Syria, United Arab
Emirates, and Jordan, but 1s now extinct in these regions
(Harrison & Bates 1991; Grubb 2005).
In Iraq, the species inhabits the rocky slopes, moun-
tain gorges, wooded hills, coniferous and Mediterranean
shrubland of the Zagros Mountains mainly in the ex-
treme northern and northeastern Iraq (Kurdistan Region)
(Al-Sheikhly et al. 2015). Previously, it has been report-
ed from Shanidar caves, mountain slopes near Zawitha,
Sarsank and Amadiya in Dohuk province, Baradust
Mountain, Barzan area, Zagarta Mountain, Shaglawa,
Harir Dagh, Rawanduz, Safin Dagh and Bekma Dam in
Received: 23.07.2019
Accepted: 31.03.2020
Erbil province, recorded also from Hazar Mard, Chem-
chemal and Derbendi Khan in Sulaimaniyah province
(Harrison & Bates 1991). Scattered small populations
have been reported from Barzan area, Zararan (Zerara),
foothills near Dukan Lake, Peramagroon, and Qara Dagh
mountains during 2010-2012 (Al-Sheikhly 2012b; Raza
et al. 2012: Haba 2013; Raza 2013). More recently, a
small population of wild goat has been found in Buzan
Valley in the Alqosh Mountain, a newly discovered local-
ity for this species in Nineveh province in northern Iraq
(Al-Barzangi et al. 2015). Furthermore, wild goats have
been reported for ten Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) in
the mountain chains of the Kurdistan Region in northern
Iraq (Nature Iraq 2017) (Fig. 1). The wild goat is listed
as Vulnerable (VU) by the International Union for Con-
servation of Nature (IUCN) Red List due to rapid popu-
lation decline attributed to over-exploitation (mainly by
poaching), competition for gazing areas with domestic
livestock, disturbance, and habitat destruction (Weinberg
et al. 2008).
Corresponding editor: E. Barmann
Published: 19.04.2020
106 Omar F. Al-Sheikhly et al.
New sites for wild goat in eastern
and southeastern Iraq
Four new sites for wild goat have been recently identified
within the Zagros Mountains forest steppes ecoregion
along Iraq-Iran eastern and southeastern international
borders, the foothills of (4) Zurbattyah (Zurbatia), (11)
Kani Sakht, (111) Kazaneah, and (iv) Al-Teeb (red-circled
sites in Fig. 1).
The foothills of Zurbatiyah (site 2 in Fig. 1) and Kani
Sakht (site 3 in Fig. 1) are extending to the northeast
of Badrah district in Wasit province, Kazaneah (site 1
in Fig. 1) extends to the southeast of Mandli district in
Diyala province (ca. 140 km far from Baghdad), and
Al-Teeb (site 4 in Fig. 1) extends to the to the north of
Myssan province. The general landscape of sites 1-3 is
characterized by rocky slopes, rocky outcrops and veg-
etated hills, while site 4 is mainly dominated by broad
rocky and gypsum valleys, arid plains, and grasslands.
These habitats seem to provide food resources, water
streams for drinking, hiding places, grazing areas, and
possibly mating sites for wild goats.
JORDAN
4000 m
3000 m
2500 m +
2000 m +
1500m +
1000 m —+—
750 m
500 m
400m -—
300 m
SAUDI ARABIA
Our intensive interviews with local hunters and villag-
ers indicated that several scattered herds of 15—80 wild
goats are frequently chased and persecuted by local hunt-
ers along the foothills of eastern and southeastern Iraq
where small resident populations may be present. In Au-
gust 2017, two adult males and an adult female with twin
offspring (ca. 3 weeks old) were shot in the rocky slopes
of Zurbatiyah foothills by local hunters (Fig. 2b). In Feb-
ruary 2018, three adult males were shot in the foothills of
Kani Sakht (Fig. 2e—f), and four adult males were shot in
the foothills of Kazaneah in November 2018 (Fig. 2g).
Recent reliable reports indicate that scattered nomadic
herds of wild goats were frequently observed and chased
by local hunters in the foothills of Al-Teeb in March-
April 2018 which represents the southernmost sighting of
this species in Iraq (BM AI-Tael, pers. comm. 2019). All
of the examined wild goat male carcasses showed a rus-
set-brown pelage with black stripes on the back, around
the withers, on the front of legs and on the edge of the
pale-brown belly, and black foreheads with long black
beards and long horns curved backwards.
Awiia Goat Capra aegagrus Literature records in Iraq
36°49'N 44°13'E
36°53'N 43°9'E
43°20'E
43°29'E
44°23'E
4P7'E
4e°7'E
44°19'E Harrison & Bates 1991
44°22'E
44°30'E
44°19'E
4416
4548'E
44°57'E
45°53'E
4P TE
44°12'E
44°50'E
1. Shanidar caves
2. mountains near Zawitha
3. Sarsank
4, Amadiya
5. Baradust Mountain
6. Barzan area
7. Zagarta Mountain
8. Shaglawa
9. Harir Dagh
10. Rawanduz
11. Safin Dagh
12, Bekma Dam
13. Hazar Mard
14. Chemchemal
15. Derbendi Khan
16, Barzan area
17. Zararan area
18. foothills near Dukan Lake 36° 4'N
19. Peramagroon Mountain 35°43'N 45°6'E ered aay
20.QaraDagh Mountain ss 35°43'N = 45°23'E AL Fa
21. Algosh Mountain 36°46'N 43°9'E Al-Barzangi et al. 2015
22. Dure area 43°30'E
23. Barzan area 44°7'E
24. Bradost Mountain 44°23'E
25. Sakran Mountain 44°58'E
26. Assos Mountain i 45°7'E
27. Permagroon Mountain 35°43'N 45°16'E
28. Qara dagh Mountain 35°3'N 45°23'E
29. Darbendikhan area 35° 8'N = 45°53E
30. Ahmed Awa 35°19'N 46°6'E
31. Hawraman area 35°S'N 46° BE
Raza et al. 2012
Haba 2013
Nature Iraq 2017
\.@ Wild Goat Capra aegagrus recent records in Iraq
33°36'N 45°53'E
33°14'N 46°10'E
33°18'N 46° 4'E
32°27'N §47°17'E
. Kazaneah
2. Zurbatiyah
3. Kani Sakht
4, Al-Teeb
[] Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG)
[] Nature Reserve
KUWAIT
400 Kilometers
Fig. 1. Literature and recent records of Wild goat Capra aegagrus Erxleben, 1777 in Iraq.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 105-110
©ZFMK
New distribution range of C. aegagrus Erxleben, 1777 to the south of its known extant in Iraq 107
The current zoogeographical range of wild goat in Iraq
is represented by a patchy distribution pattern of scat-
tered populations of the subspecies C. a. aegagrus which
mainly exist in northern and northeastern Iraq (Kurdistan
Region) (Al-Sheikhly & Haba 2014; Al-Sheikhly et al.
2015). However, the Iraqi largest sedentary populations
of wild goat are known from Peramagroon, Qara Dagh,
and Barzan mountains where they are protected by the
Kurdistan Forestry Police and preserved by tribal com-
munities for decades 1n the latter mountain (Raza et al.
2012; Haba 2013). The Forestry Police of Mergasur esti-
mated more than 1000 wild goats thriving in Barzan area,
from which over 200 individuals had died due to the out-
break of goat plague or Peste des Petits Ruminants (PPR)
in August 2010 and in 2011 (Nature Iraq 2017).
During a field expedition on 26" of August 2017, a
herd of 94 wild goats (46 adult males; 31 adult females;
17 juveniles) was counted using point count method
(e.g., Gundogdu 2011) in an area of 400 ha (0.235 indi-
vidual/ha) of wooded mountain slopes in Zerara (Barzan
area) in Erbil province in northern Iraq (Fig. 2c—d). Adult
males (> 2-3 years) were representing ca. 50% of the ob-
served population (Fig. 2a); a ratio supported by inter-
views with Kurdish villagers and forestry policemen. In
spite of surveying only a small proportion of Zerara area,
our count was higher than the previously known estimate
(80 individuals/summer 2010, Nature Iraq 2017). The in-
crease of wild goat population size in Barzan area may be
attributed to the protection provided by the local commu-
nities and Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG); yet,
further monitoring may reveal better estimates. However,
our newly discovered wild goat localities in eastern and
southeastern Iraq are distant ca. 200 km away from the
largest resident populations in northern Kurdistan and
represent the southernmost distribution range of the spe-
cies in Iraq.
The newly discovered wild goat populations in east-
ern and southeastern Iraq most certainly originated from
Iranian populations that inhabit the Zagros Mountains of
western Iran. Wild goat is widely distributed in Iran; it
has been recorded from 31 province s and reported from
190 protected areas throughout the country (Karami et al.
2008; Yusefi et al. 2019). In Ilam province in western Iran,
the Kolan (Golan) Protected Area (33°23’ N, 46°9’ E)
and Bina and Byar No-hunting area (33°41’ N, 45°56’ E)
are the most adjacent protected areas to our sites 1-3,
while Dinar Kuh (Dinar Kooh) (32°50’ N, 47°20’ E) Pro-
tected Area is the closest protected area to our site 4 (Dar-
vishsefat 2006; Yusefi et al. 2019; UNEP-WCMC 2020)
(Fig. 1). However, Dehloran city is placed between Dinar
Kuh Protected Area and site 4; therefore, wild goats are
probably using the free area of ca. 7 km of Iraq-Iran inter-
national border to reach site 4. Furthermore, the free area
of the international border seems important for wild goat
to move from well protected areas and no-hunting zones
in Iran to Iraq.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 105-110
In Iran, the mating season of wild goat starts in mid-fall
(October-December) and in November in southeastern
Turkey, when both sexes aggregate in herds and males’
courtship display starts (Korshunov 1994; Ziaie 2008;
Esfandabad et al. 2010). The dominant large adult males
push the young and sick goats out of the herd which mi-
grate to adjacent habitats in search for new hiding and
grazing places. Furthermore, after mating, the large adult
males move to new areas to spend the summer (Gundog-
du 2011). The increased conspecific competition among
wild goat males may force some individuals from the
Iranian western populations to migrate to eastern and
southeastern Iraq. Moreover, as we mentioned before, the
high numbers of different-aged wild goat males that were
recently hunted in eastern and southeastern Iraq seems to
support the claim that migrated animals survived the se-
vere poaching and were able to establish new populations
in eastern and southeastern Iraq. In addition, wild goat
females with recently born young are frequently chased
and trapped by local poachers, which confirms the breed-
ing of this species within the territory of Iraq. Therefore,
urgent and increased conservation and protection actions
should be taken to save these new populations.
Esfandabad et al. (2010) suggested altitudinal and sea-
sonal migration behaviors of wild goat as an adaptation
to survive in extreme temperature and to make use of
available resources throughout the year. In winter (Jan-
uary—March), the low accessibility to food resources
due to a thick layer of snow at higher elevations forc-
es the animals to use lower altitudes where they become
exposed to natural predators and poachers (Esfandabad
et al. 2010).
It is worth noting that the wild goat population of west-
ern Iran was assigned to the nominotypical subspecies
C. a. aegagrus Erxleben, 1777, while the eastern and
southeastern ones were assigned to C. a. blythi (Hume,
1875) (Ellerman & Morrison-Scott 1951; Heptner et al.
1988). Grubb (2005) synonymized both subspecies, and
therefore, only one subspecies (C. a. aegagrus) occurs in
Iran (Yusefi et al. 2019). Furthermore, the domestication
process of goats was intensively studied by Naderi et al.
using mtDNA (2007; 2008). The wild goat populations of
eastern and southeastern Iraq 1s therefore assigned to the
Iranian subspecies C. a. aegagrus.
Threats on the wild goat population in Iraq
Poaching
Hunting of wild goat has been identified as a major threat
on the species survival (Weinberg et al. 2008; Gundogdu
2011). The illegal hunting (shooting, trapping, and catch-
ing by dogs) is a major threat on the species in Iran which
increases during the rutting season in fall, when trophy
males are easier to detect by poachers (Ziaie 2008). The
wild goat population in Iraq had remarkably decreased
©ZFMK
108 Omar F. Al-Sheikhly et al.
due to excessive poaching compared to the 1920s (Hatt
1959; Al-Sheikhly 2012c). In northern Iraq (Kurdistan
Region), most of the wild goat populations were affect-
ed by habitat destruction and disturbance that occurred
during Iraq-Iran conflict in the 1980s (Al-Sheikhly et al.
2015). However, the hunting of wild goats was prohibit-
ed by the Kurdistan Regional Government in the 1990s
(Al-Barzangi et al. 2015). In eastern and southeastern
Iraq, the hunting of wild goats and other sympatric bo-
vid species is continued and seems to be uncontrolled by
the local authorities and warrants urgent governmental
protection. Two of our sites, Zurbatiyah and Al-Teeb
Fig. 2. a. Adult males wild goat Capra aegagrus Erxleben, 1777 grazing on rocky slopes of Zerara area in Erbil province in north-
ern Iraq. b. An adult male shot in Zurbatiyah foothills (red-circled site 2 in Fig. 1). e-d. Females with kids observed in Zerara area
in Erbil province in northern Iraq. e-f. Adult males shot in the foothills of Kani Sakht (site 3 in Fig. 1). g. An adult male shot in
the foothills of Kazaneah (site 1 in Fig. 1). h. Asiatic Mouflon Ovis orientalis gmelini shot in the foothills of eastern Iraq. i. A wild
goat kid captured from the foothills of eastern Iraq in order to be raised as a pet. Photos: a-d: ©Omar Al-Sheikhly; b—i: ©Basheer
Mohmmad AI-Taei.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 105-110
©ZFMK
New distribution range of C. aegagrus Erxleben, 1777 to the south of its known extant in Iraq 109
(Zubaidaat and Teeb Oasis) have national importance for
wildlife conservation. Both sites have been designated as
Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs no. 57 and 67) respec-
tively and declared as nature reserves by the Ministry of
Environment of Iraq (Nature Iraq 2017; UNEP-WCMC
2020).
Besides wild goat, the Vulnerable Asiatic mouflon Ovis
orientalis gmelini (Blyth, 1841) (Fig. 2h) and the Vul-
nerable Persian goitered gazelle Gazella subgutturosa
(Guldenstaedt, 1780) are targeted by local hunters where
and whenever possible in order to be consumed as food
or raised as pets (Al-Sheikhly 2012a; c). Furthermore,
the Vulnerable Arabian Sand Gazelle G. marica (Thom-
as, 1897) probably exists in eastern and southeastern Iraq
(Fadakar et al. 2019). It is worth mentioning, that hunt-
ing the aforementioned species is banned by the Iraqi
Wild Animals Protection Law (no. 17 issued on 15" of
February 2010), but the weak enforcement encourages
hunters to pursuit their illegal quest. The local hunters
who are equipped with modern hunting rifles and fleets
of all terrains are extensively searching for wild bovids in
the foothills and steppes of eastern and southeastern Iraq
throughout the year, with extensive poaching occurring
mainly in winter and spring (January—June). Poaching of
wild goat in eastern and southeastern Iraq is extensive-
ly practiced in winter (seven males/November—Febru-
ary 2018) when wild goats seem to abandon the higher
grounds of the adjacent protected areas in western Iran to
retreat to lower altitudes in eastern and southeastern Iraq.
Trapping
In our recent investigation we found that trapping has
emerged as a newly documented threat on wild bovid
populations in Iraq. The solitary, nomadic, and rutting
wild goats, Asiatic mouflons, and Persian goitered ga-
zelles are ambushed and trapped by large nets fired from
net-modified rifles or taken by a long chase via motor-
cycles. The trapped animals are sold in the local animal
markets or exported to the neighboring Arabian countries
as pets. Our interviews with the local animal traders re-
vealed that the prices of the trapped animals are varying
based on sex and age. The price ranges from $300—500
for wild goat juveniles and adult female Persian goitered
gazelles, to $800—900 for adult female wild goats, and
$400-500 for adult male wild goats.
Capturing/collecting of young from the wild
Our interviews, personal communications and corre-
spondences with local hunters indicated that parturition
takes place in early April to mid July in the wild goat
populations of eastern and southeastern Iraq which seems
concurrent to those of western Turkmenistan (Korshunov
1994) and southeastern Turkey (Gundogdu 2011). At that
time, foot patrols of local trappers/collectors are search-
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 105-110
ing for wild goat pregnant females and/or their new-
ly born not-weaned offspring in the rocky caverns and
foothill cliffs of eastern Iraq. The interviews indicate that
the kidnapped wild goat juveniles are kept to be raised
as pets or sold in the local animal markets where many
may die due to irresponsible care (Fig. 21). It is worth
mentioning that the capturing of the ungulate young by
local trappers seems to be a common illegal practice in
western and central Iraq which requires further actions
(Al-Sheikhly 201 2a).
Acknowledgments. We are grateful the Iraqi Wildlife Center
(IWC) and Iraqi Green Climate Organization (IGCO) for con-
tinuous support of the wildlife studies in Iraq. We would like
to thank Basheer Mohmmad AI-Taei (a conservationist) for his
detailed information and photographs of the wild goat hunting
and distribution in eastern and southeastern Iraq. Our grati-
tude extends to Ta’eeb Al-Barazani and Abdulallah Al-Baraz-
ani (Forestry Police of Mergasur- Kurdistan Region) for their
detailed information on the species phenology in Barzan area,
to Abdulhamed Al-Habash (Iraqi Hunters Association) for his
further comments on the ungulates hunting in Iraq, and to the
anonymous reviewers for their comments on the earlier version
of this article.
REFERENCES
Al-Barazengy AN, Salman AO, Omar BA (2015) New sight-
ing of the wild goat Capra aegagrus (Erxleben, 1777) in
Nineveh province, Northern Iraq. Bulletin of Iraq Natural
History Museum 13: 21—27
Al-Sheikhly OF (2012a) Notes on antelopes in Iraq. Gunsletter
30: 11-12
Al-Sheikhly OF (2012b) Some ecological observations on
Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni in northern and Northern
West of Iraq. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Baghdad, Baghdad
Al-Sheikhly OF (2012c) The hunting of endangered mammals
in Iraq. Wildlife Middle East 6: 10
Al-Sheikhly OF, Haba MK (2014) The field guide to the wild
mammals of Iraq. Al-Farahidi Press, Baghdad
Al-Sheikhly OF, Haba MK, Barbanera F, Csorba G, Harrison
DL (2015) Checklist of the mammals of Iraq (Chordata:
Mammalia). Bonn Zoological Bulletin 64: 33-58
Aulaginier S, Haffner P, Mitchell-Joones AJ, Moutou F, Zima J
(2008) Mammals of Europe, North Africa and Middle East.
A&C Black Publishers Ltd, London
Darvishsefat AA (2006) Atlas of protected areas of Iran. Tehran
University Press, Tehran
Ellerman JR, Morrison-Scott TCS (1951) Checklist of Pa-
laearctic and Indian mammals; 1758 to 1946. The British
Museum of Natural History, London
Esfandabad BS, Karami M, Hemami MR, Riazi B, Sadough
MB (2010) Habitat associations of wild goat in central Iran:
implications for conservation. European Journal of Wildlife
Research 56: 883-894
Fadakar D, Mirzakhah M, Naderi S, Barmann EV, Nasari MN,
Gorji FM, Rezaei HR (2019) The first record of mitochondri-
al haplotypes of Gazella marica (Artiodactyla, Bovidae) in
wild populations in Iran. Mammalian Biology 95: 181-187
Grubb P (2005) Artiodactyla. Pp. 21-42 in: Wilson DE & Reed-
er DM (eds) Mammal species of the world. A Taxonomic and
©ZFMK
110 Omar F. Al-Sheikhly et al.
Geographic Reference (3rd Edition). Johns Hopkins Univer-
sity Press, Baltimore
Gundogdu E (2011) Population size, structure and behaviours
of wild goat in Cehennemdere Wildlife Improvement Area.
Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 6: 555—
563
Haba MK (2013) Documentation some mammals in Iraq Kurd-
istan region. Journal of University of Zakho 1: 145-151
Harrison DL, Bates PJJ (1991) The mammals of Arabia. Harri-
son Zoological Museum, Kent
Hatt RT (1959) The Mammals of Iraq. Miscellaneous Publi-
cations Museum of Zoology University of Michigan 106:
1-113
Heptner VG, Nasimovich AA, Bannikov AG (1988) Mammals
of the Soviet Union. Artiodactyla and Perissodactyla. Smith-
sonian Institution Libraries and the National Science Foun-
dation, Washington D.C.
Karami M, Hutterer R, Benda P, Siahsarvie R, KryStufek B
(2008) Annotated Check-List of the Mammals of Iran. Lynx
(Praha) 39: 63-102
Korshunov VM (1994) Ecology of the bearded goat Capra ae-
gagrus (Erxleben, 1777) in Turkmenistan. Biogeography and
Ecology of Turkmenistan 72: 231-246
Macar O, Gurkan K (2009) Observation on behavior wild goat
Capra aegagrus (Erxleben, 1777). Hacettepe Journal of Bi-
ology and Chemistry 37: 13-21
Naderi S, Rezaei HR, Pompanon F, Blum MG, Negrini
R, Naghash HR, Balkiz O, Mashkour M, Gaggiotti OE,
Ajmone-Marsan P, Kence A (2008). The goat domestication
process inferred from large-scale mitochondrial DNA analy-
sis of wild and domestic individuals. Proceedings of the Na-
tional Academy of Sciences 105: 17659-17664
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 105-110
Naderi S, Rezaei HR, Taberlet P, Zundel S, Rafat SA, Naghash
HR, El-Barody MA, Ertugrul O, Pompanon F, Econogene
Consortium (2007) Large-scale mitochondrial DNA analysis
of the domestic goat reveals six haplogroups with high diver-
sity. PloS One 2(10): e1012.
Nature Iraq (2017) Key Biodiversity Areas of Iraq. Al-Ghadeer
Printing, Basra
Raza HA (2013) On conserving the wild goat Capra aegagrus
in Peramagroon and Qara Dagh mountains, Iraq conservation
leadership. Wildlife Middle East 6: 5
Raza HA, Abdulhasan N, Ararat K, Qadir M, Ali L (2012)
Conserving Wild Goats Capra aegagrus at Qara Dagh and
Peramagroon Mountains, Iraq. Conservation Leadership
Programme ID: 0545611. Online at http://www.conserva-
tionleadershipprogramme.org/project/wild-goats-iraq/ [last
accessed on July 16, 2019]
UNEP-WCMC (2020). Protected Area Profile for Iraq from the
World Database of Protected Areas, March 2020. Online at
www.protectedplanet.net [last accessed on March 10, 2020]
Weinberg P, Jdeidi T, Masseti M, Nader I, de Smet K, Cuzin F
(2008) Capra aegagrus. In: The IUCN Red List of Threat-
ened Species 2008. Online at e.T3786A 10076632. http://dx-
.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T3786A 10076632.
en [last accessed on July 16, 2019]
Yusefi GH, Faizolahi K, Darvish J, Safi K, Brito JC (2019) The
species diversity, distribution, and conservation status of the
terrestrial mammals of Iran. Journal of Mammalogy 100:
55-7
Ziaie H (2008) A field guide to mammals of Iran, 2™! edn. Wild-
life Center Publication, Iran
©ZFMK
FORSCHUNGS
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 111-115
2020 - Gippoliti S. & Lupi L.
https://do1.org/10.20363/BZB-2020.69.1.111
Scientific note
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:925DF201-A926-4633-B830-14B111BDEF4C
A note on the wild canids (Carnivora: Canidae) of the Horn of Africa,
with the first evidence of a new — forgotten —
species for Ethiopia Canis mengesi Noack, 1897
Spartaco Gippoliti!& Luca Lup?’
'Societa Italiana per la Storia della Fauna “Giuseppe Altobello”’, Viale Liegi 48A, I-00198 Roma, Italy
?Centro di Documentazione e Studi della Dancalia, Pontedera (Pisa), Italy
* Corresponding author: Email: spartacolobus@gmail.com
'urn:|lsid:zoobank.org:author:833DA273-590F-4E54-8A 12-42262EB88C1F
>urn:Isid:zoobank.org: author: 7CEC1C51-7531-4E1A-BOE7-42A6AE3031BA
Abstract. The first ever reported observation of a member of the genus Canis well in the interior of the Danakil area (Ethi-
opia) offers the opportunity to revise available evidence about the existence of a neglected species of small-sized ‘jackal’
in the Horn of Africa. A review of historical zoological literature led to assign this small-sized, reddish jackal to Canis
mengesi Noack, 1897, originally described from inner Somaliland. Geological and geomorphological considerations sup-
port the distinctiveness of the Red Sea coastal jackal Canis anthus riparius Hemprich & Ehrenberg, 1832, typical of the
narrow alluvial, sandy coast, while Canis mengesi is found in the volcanic rocky habitat prevailing over most northern
ISSN 2190-7307
http://www.zoologicalbulletin.de
Afar (Danakil, Ethiopia).
Key words. Canis mengesi, Canis riparius, Danakil, geomorphology, taxonomy.
Knowledge of mammals in some parts of the Horn of
Africa is still very sparse, and gaps exist even with re-
spect to species diversity among the most visible mam-
mals. Regarding canids, one of the best studied mammal
group worldwide, a short note on an unusual wolf-like
individual observed in coastal Danakil Eritrea (Tiwari &
Sillero Zubiri 2004) should have promoted more inter-
est regarding the issue of alpha diversity among canids
in the Horn of Africa, but nothing apparently was done
and this observation remained unidentified. Currently,
much scientific interest concerning the intriguing African
‘golden jackal’ group, has been attracted by new phyloge-
netic data that allied this canid closer to the Eurasian wolf
Canis [upus rather than the Eurasian golden jackal Canis
aureus (Viranta et al. 2017).
The object of this note 1s another observation of a sin-
gle individual of an unusual small-sized canid in the in-
terior of northern Afar (Danakil) region of Ethiopia, done
by one of us (L.L.) on January 1* 2018, along the road
between the Massif of Dadar and the Massif of Masca
(about 12°43’ N, 41°08’ E). A few photos allow us to
discuss some details concerning this individual while at-
tempting a taxonomic identification. This small canid was
observed along a recently asphalted road about 150 km
Received: 28.02.2020
Accepted: 02.04.2020
south of Lake Afrera, an area lacking data concerning the
presence of any member of the genus Canis (cfr. Yalden
et al. 1980). The small size of this individual canid is ev-
ident from comparison with the horizontal traffic signals
(Fig. 1).
The general reddish coloration may suggest a red fox
Vulpes vulpes — a species that 1s probably part of the Er-
itrean fauna (Gippoliti 2020a) yet unlikely to inhabit the
Danakil Region — but the blackish end of the tail, the lack
of black behind the ear, the body building and body pro-
portion (Fig. 2) led to reject this hypothesis.
As evidenced by photos, the canid was observed in
rocky habitat typical of the central and northern rocky
plateau of Afar. The Danakil depression is floored prin-
cipally by Pliocene volcanic rocks of the Afar Stratoid
series (Barberi & Santacroce 1980). The Afar Depres-
sion, between the Red Sea and the Ethiopian plateau, is
covered by Tertiary and Quaternary volcanic rocks. The
Danakil Alps run parallel to the coast, forming a strong
barrier between the interior area and the sandy and allu-
vial coastal region (Fig. 3) (Lupi 2009, 2012).
Unlike Tiwari & Sillero-Zubiri (2004), we examined
the classical zoological and taxonomic literature, a valu-
able source of data concerning morphological diversity
Corresponding editor: R. Hutterer
Published: 19.04.2020
12 Spartaco Gippoliti & Luca Lupi
Figs 1 (left) and 2 (right). Two photos of the same individual canid. Note the small size and habitat characteristics where this canid
individual was observed. Photos: Luca Lupi.
that is often overlooked by recent research (Gippoliti
2020b). We found that a canid taxon with the characters
shown in the photo was described from the Horn of Afri-
ca at the end of the 19th century. In 1897, the German zo-
ologist Theodor Noack described two new canid species
from several living specimens captured in Somaliland by
Joseph Menges, a collaborator of the famous Carl Hagen-
beck (Noack 1897). The larger species was named Canis
hagenbecki while the smaller one became Canis men-
gesi. These descriptions were based on numerous living
specimens and several skulls in the possession of Noack.
According to Noack (1897), Canis mengesi is smaller
and shorter-legged than C. hagenbecki. His diagnostic
characters, especially compared with C. hagenbecki, in-
clude the following: snout is shorter and the longer ear
has a slenderer tip. The hind quarters are kept low, so that
the gait of the animal resembles a hyena. Hair on the back
is short, with a dark spot on the middle tail, but without
or at least with only a minor black tip of the tail. Body
colour is reddish yellow or reddish grey, including the
nasal area and the rear of the ears. Forehead red grey, hair
on the back paler with more yellow hair tips, the brown
of the hair tips hardly visible if present at all. Lower lip
is brown, upper lip white, iris of the eye yellowish red
with a grey hue. Legs are yellowish red, not darker on
the forelegs, hardly paler on the inner sides. A dark collar
on the neck is absent. Breast and belly are paler than the
flanks. The species digs cavities in the soil. The vocaliza-
tion is similar to C. hagenbecki, but more whining, rather
like a young dog. Skull is slender, with an only weakly
curved profile, nasal bones somewhat longer than max-
illae, and broader in front than in the middle. Occiput as
in C. hagenbecki and C. anthus. Pterygoid process more
widely spaced from each other than in C. hagenbecki.
Upper premolars 2 and 3 with additional cusp, as low-
er premolar 4 that has 2 additional cusps. Noack failed
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 111-115
to provide details on types, and the exact provenance of
Canis mengesi — as those of C. hagenbecki - remained
vague - Somaliland, Ktistengegenden, Inneres? (Noack,
1897: 518). Heck (1899) under the name of Canis hadra-
maticus Noack published a photo — perhaps the only one
so far published — of one of the captive Canis menge-
si Studied by Noack, showing a relatively massive head
compared to body and legs, and the white area over the
lips (Fig. 3).
Some years later Hilzheimer (1906) not only accepted
C. mengesi, but on the basis of the study of two more
skulls (ex-captive animals captured in Somaliland) in
the museum of Stuttgart, he described a new subspecies,
Canis mengesi lamperti. With 125 and 121 mm their
basilar lengths are even smaller than the type of Canis
mengesi, which they resemble except that their nasalia
do not extend as far back as the maxillary (Hilzheimer
1906). According to Hilzheimer (1906), Canis mengesi
is the smallest true jackal, which forms a group of its
own within the golden jackal group due to its color and
skull shape. Its native range is unknown but could be the
interior of northern Somalia. Maximum basilar length of
its skull is 132 mm. He described C. mengesi lamperti as
very small, as red as a fox, black in midline of back, very
long ears, no black markings and tail with dark brown tip
(Hilzheimer 1908).
The mounted skin of the holotype of Canis mengesi
lamperti (SMNS 2394) is shown here for the first time
as far as we know (Fig. 5), while its skull was shown
by Hilzheimer (1908: table II). It is a male from Joseph
Menges’ expedition to Somaliland that lived in a zoo in
Stuttgart and was donated by Nill to the museum 1n 1897
(Dieterlen et al. 2013). The meagre evidence so far avail-
able does not allow a clear assessment of the minor mor-
phological differences between the two described taxa of
mengesi and our own observation, yet we can conserva-
©ZFMK
A note on the wild canids of the Horn of Africa
U prwatis
“sare A aoa % ow
ees:
rs ODWe nae
id Dahlak Arr c MPT
cA ly. Ae Race
? -—_
oo
eC
ne Sp sae ee Kebir
YEMEN
O Canis anthus riparius
lv Canis mengesi
|
|
(tdi,2002) | 0
GEOLOGICAL LEGEND - LEGENDA GEOLOGICA |
Scale - Scala
1:950.000
Scale - Scala
1:400.000
/\ Fluvial and lacustrine sediments,
‘| continental conglomerates (a),
evaporites (b)
Sedimenti fluviali, lacustri, conglomerati
b} continentali (a), evaporiti (b)
Basaltic lavas (L) and pyroclastic
rocks (P oe redean 4 in
BZA te aioe piroclastiti (P) basaltiche
ae di and pyroclastic rocks
L_} of subaerial origin
Lave e piroclastiti basaltiche subaeree
Lavas of intermediate composition of
LEX) subaerial origin
Lave a composizione intermedia subaere
Rhyolitic we (LR) and pyroclastic
rocks (PR) L.S.
Lave (LR) e piroclastiti (PR) riolitiche L.S.
Axial volcanic ranges (< 1 Mya)
Catene vulcaniche assiali (< 1 Ma)
Marginal rhyolite centers (< 4 Mya)
Centri riolitici di margine (< 4 Ma) e i Spater cones
Transverse basaltic volcanism (< 4 Mya)
Vulcanismo basaltico trasversale (< 4 Ma)
EDA PET. a \
Sa 9 ae
Scale - Scala
1:950.000
Afar stratoid series (4-1 Mya)
Serie stratoide dellAfar (4-1 Ma)
—¢'
Q
Dhala basalts series (8-6 Mya) Be,
Serie basaltica di Dhala (8-6 Ma) ;
K
iy?
Mabla rhyolites series (14-10 Mya) | | |
Serie riolitica di Mabla (14-10 Ma) ;
Neoproterozoic basement, Mesozoic
sediments, Tertiary flood basalts (a),
peralkaline granites (b)
Basamento Neoproterozoico, sedimenti
mesozoici, plateau basaltici del
Terziatio (a), graniti peralcalini (b)
\. Sh a
113
Fig. 3. Geomorphological map of Danakil (Lupi 2012), showing our visual record of Canis mengesi (triangle), and those assigned
to Canis anthus riparius (circle).
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 111-115
©ZFMK
114 Spartaco Gippoliti & Luca Lupi
Fig. 4. A living Canis mengesi at Berlin Zoo before his formal
description by Noack. From Heck (1899) who labeled it Canis
hadramauticus Noack. Note the white area over the lips, which
was emphasized by Noack (1897) in his description of mengesi.
tively propose that a small reddish member of the genus
Canis occurs in Danakil, Ethiopia and Somaliland and
his name is Canis mengesi Noack, 1897.
The taxonomic history of Canis mengesi is quite typ-
ical of the systematic attitude of the previous century.
Anderson (1902) studied a skin and skull of C. mengesi
(not one of the typical series, apparently) in Berlin and
maintained it as specifically distinct, a position that also
De Winton (footnote in Anderson 1902: 220) clearly ac-
cepted, changing his previous opinion “In my paper on
African Canidae, C. mengesi was doubtfully referred to
this species [C. variegatus]. Further material has enabled
me to see my mistake, and I fully agree with the view
here expressed”. Anderson (1902) provided the follow-
ing measurements taken on the mounted skin: head and
body length 510 mm, tail length 223 mm, height at shoul-
der 290 mm, ear length 75 mm anterior and 90 mm poste-
rior. Interestingly, some of these measurements are lower
than those reported for the red fox Vulpes vulpes in Egypt
(Osborn & Helmy 1980). The skin (no number but skull
n. 6073) was described by Anderson (1902: 219-220)
as follow “Greyish yellow throughout on the trunk, but
many of the hairs with long black tips; slightly rufous on
the upper surface of the muzzle and white along the upper
lip and on the side of the face before the eyes; chin and
throat white, but a brown area on the middle of the upper
lip. Side of head below the ears yellow, back of ears yel-
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 111-115
low with black hairs intermixed. Inside of ears clothed
with white hairs. A tendency to form a dark collar. Fore
limbs bright yellowish, but with a faintly dark area down
the front to near the wrist. Outsides of hind limbs yellow.
Under parts white, with the exception of the base of the
throat in front. Tail concolorous with the body, towards
the tip broadly marked with dark blackish brown; the
black spot on its dorsal surface well defined.” Schwarz
(1926) synonymized several taxa, among them menge-
si, under the name Canis aureus riparius Hemphrich &
Ehrenberg, 1832. Glover Allen (Allen 1939), followed
Schwarz and maintained mengesi as a synonym of Thos
aureus riparius but considered Thos lamperti distinct at
the specific level although stressing the need for further
studies that never happened. Therefore Coetzee (1971)
felt justified to state that “Canis mengesi lamperti [....] 1s
regarded here as asynonym of C. a. riparius”’, apparently
without justification, but de facto relegating the taxon to
oblivion.
After reviewing the few available data and the photo-
graphic evidence here presented, it seems reasonable to
conclude that
1. Asmall-sized member of the genus Canis is found in
the interior of Ethiopian Danakil,
2. Its reddish color, size and pattern generally agree with
that of a forgotten taxon, Canis mengesi, so far his-
torically known only from the interior of Somaliland,
3. Photographic evidence offered by Tiwari & Sille-
ro-Zubiri (2004) seems to confirm that Canis mengesi
is a distinct taxon from the one occupying the coastal
plain zone of Eritrea (i.e., Canis anthus riparius),
4. This new record may indicate that C. mengesi is a
specialist of arid rocky habitats.
Apparently for the first time in decades we propose a
much richer diversity of African canids taxa than usu-
ally recognized, particularly of the genus Canis — now
that the species mesomelas and adusta are separated in
the genus Lupulella (Atickem et al. 2017; but see also
Machado & Teta 2020). The few data concerning golden
Fig. 5. Holotype of Canis mengesi lamperti, courtesy C. Leid-
enroth, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart
©ZFMK
A note on the wild canids of the Horn of Africa 115
jackals in the Eritrean coastal region (Fig. 3), historically
assigned to the taxon riparius, are clearly limited to the
sandy alluvial coastal plain while we documented a total-
ly different canid in interior Danakil, that has been never
observed in the much better studied coastal region. We
propose therefore that the so far under-appreciated geo-
morphological diversity of the Horn of Africa is one of
the reasons to explain the presence of several lineages of
Canis (Gippoliti 2018). In agreement with Groves et al.
(2017) and Gippoliti (2019), we think that such diversi-
ty 1s better described by ranking these lineages as spe-
cies, and this is particularly the case with Canis mengesi
whose dwarf size, specialized habitat and hair color is
well outside the known variability shown by the ‘African
golden jackal/wolf’ Canis anthus Cuvier, 1820 as it is
now universally understood.
Acknowledgements. The late Colin Groves and Arnd Sch-
reiber provided valuable help in the translation of German pa-
pers and are warmly thanked for this. We wish to thank Stefan
Merker and Carsten Leidenroth, State Museum of Natural His-
tory Stuttgart, for the photo of the holotype of Canis menge-
si lamperti. Richard Weigl and Jan Robovsky helped with the
old Berlin photo. Bruce Patterson (Chicago), Rainer Hutterer
(Bonn), Nikolai Spassov (Sofia) and Boris KryStufek (Ljublja-
na) made valuable revisions of previous versions of the manu-
script.
REFERENCES
Allen GA (1939) A Checklist of African Mammals. Bulletin of
the Museum of Comparative Zoology 83: 3-763
Anderson J (1902) Zoology of Egypt, Mammalia. Hugh Rees
Ltd, London
Atickem A, Stenseth NC, Drouilly M, Bock S, Roos C, Zinner
D (2017) Deep divergence among mitochondrial lineages in
African jackals, Lupulella mesomelas (Schreber, 1775) and
L. adusta (Sundevall, 1847). Zoologica Scripta 47: 1-8
Beaux O de (1931) Spedizione del Barone Raimondo Franchet-
ti in Dancalia. Mammiferi. Annali Museo civico Storia Natu-
rale Genova 60: 183-217
Coetzee CG (1971) Order Carnivora. Pp. 1-42 in: Meester J,
Setzer HW (eds) The Mammals of Africa. An identification
manual. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington
Barberi F, Santacroce R (1980) The Afar Stratoid Series
and the magmatic evolution of East African rift system.
Bulletin de la Societe Geologique de France S7-XXII (6):
891-899
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 111-115
Dieterlen F, Turni H, Marquart K (2013) Type specimens of
mammals in the collection of the Museum of Natural History
Stuttgart. Stuttgarter Beitrage zur Naturkunde A, Neue Serie
6: 291-303
Gippoliti S (2018) Far-reaching effects of “taxonomic iner-
tia”. The case of the ‘Canis anthus’ complex classification
and conservation in Northern Africa Preprint. August 2018.
https//doi.org10.13140/RG.2.2.13604.53121
Gippoliti S (2019) Mammal species delimitation matters. A re-
ply to Zachos (2018). Mammalian Biology 94: 127-131
Gippoliti S (2020a). Records of Ethiopian and Eritrean mam-
mals in Italian literature and museums, with some taxonomic
notes. Biogeographia-The Journal of Integrative Biogeogra-
phy 35: 27-42
Gippoliti S (2020b) Everything mammal conservation biol-
ogists always wanted to know about taxonomy (but were
afraid to ask). Journal for Nature Conservation 54: 1-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125793
Groves CP, Cotterill FPD, Gippoliti S, Robovsky J, Roos C,
Taylor PJ, Zinner D (2017) Species definitions and conser-
vation: A review and case studies from African mammals.
Conservation Genetics 18: 1247-1256
Heck L. 1899. Lebende Bilder. Aus dem Reiche der Tiere. Ber-
lin
Hilzheimer M (1906) Die geographische Verbreitung der Af-
rikanischen Grauschakale. Zoologischer Beobachter 47:
363-373
Hilzheimer M (1908) Beitrag zur Kenntnis der nordafrikan-
ischen Schakale nebst Bemerkungen tuber deren Verhaltnis
zu den Haushunden, insbesondere nordafrikanischen und al-
tagyptischen Hunderassen. Zoologica 53: 1-111
Lupi L (2009) Dancalia. L’esplorazione dell’ Afar, un’avventura
italiana. Vols. 1 & 2, Tagete edizioni, Pontedera
Lupi L (2012) Afar Region, Dancalia, geological and route map
1: 950.000. Litografia Artistica Cartografica, Firenze
Machado FA, Teta P (2020) Morphometric analysis of skull
shape reveals unprecedented diversity of African Canidae.
Journal of Mammalogy. https//doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/
gyz214
Noack T (1897) Ostafrikanische Schakale. Zoologischer Anzei-
ger 20: 517-521
Osborn D, Helmy I (1980) The contemporary land mammals
of Egypt (including Sinai). Fieldiana Zoology, New Series
5: 1-579
Schwarz E (1926) Der Schakal der Galla-Hochlander. Varia-
tionsstudien an Saugetieren, I. Senckenbergiana 8: 155-158
Tiwari JK, Sillero-Zubiri C (2004) Unidentified canid in the
Danakil desert of Eritrea, Horn of Africa. Canid News 7: 5
Viranta S, Atickem A, Werdelin L, Stenseth NC (2017) Redis-
covering a forgotten canid species. BMC Zoology 2: 6
Yalden DW, Largen MJ, Kock D (1980) Catalogue of the mam-
mals of Ethiopia. Monitore Zoologico Italiano Supplemento
13 (1): 169-272
©ZFMK
BHL
i
Blank Page Digitally Inserted
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 117-122
2020 - Gokulakrishnan G. et al.
https://do1.org/10.20363/BZB-2020.69.1.117
ISSN 2190-7307
http://www.zoologicalbulletin.de
Scientific note
urn:|sid:zoobank.org:pub: BCCS5 BF79-B2F4-40A2-AD92-55D3AC977FCB
Further records of a poorly-known insular endemic skink
Lipinia macrotympanum (Stoliczka, 1873)
(Squamata: Scincidae)
G. Gokulakrishnan’, C. Sivaperuman’ & S. R. Chandramouli* *
'? Zoological Survey of India, Andaman and Nicobar Regional Centre, Haddo, Port Blair
3 Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Pondicherry University, Puducherry
* Corresponding author: Email: findthesnakeman@gmail.com
'urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:8 1676BC5-F41F-4A8A-8531-FF9CBB282843
?urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:08F28A 1 0-E80D-420C-924 1 -24F5CC199EB6
-urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:73 BF7214-77B 1-45EA-A7FB-8CB13D15094F
Abstract. The little-known, insular endemic skink Lipinia macrotympanum (Stoliczka, 1873) was recorded recently from
two new localities in Great Nicobar Biosphere Reserve (GNBR) further south of the previously known localities. Based
on these observations, new data on morphology, natural history and distribution are presented and it is suggested to be
considered as an endangered species based on the IUCN assessment criteria.
Key words. Lipinia macrotympanum, new locality records, distribution map, Nicobar archipelago.
The skink genus Lipinia Gray, 1845 is represented by 32
species which are distributed from the Nicobar Islands
in the West to Papua New Guinea in the east (Uetz et al.
2019). Of these, the westernmost representative of the ge-
nus, Lipinia macrotympanum was described originally by
Stoliczka (1873) as Mocoa macrotympanum from “South
Andaman, on a sandy beach in Macpherson’s Straits”.
Later, Biswas & Sanyal (1977) reported a specimen of
this species erroneously identified as “Lygosoma qua-
drivittatum” (now Lipinia quadrivittata) from Campbell
Bay, Great Nicobar. Subsequently, Das (1997) reported
the rediscovery of Lipinia macrotympanum based on
his new collection of a specimen from Pulo Ulon, Little
Nicobar and the specimen reported by Biswas & Sanyal
(1977). Ever since this report, Lipinia macrotympanum
was never recorded from the Andaman and Nicobar Is-
lands. Herein, we report on two specimens of Lipinia
macrotympanum based on our field observations and col-
lected specimens. One of the individuals reported here
(ZSI/ANRC/T/3709) was illustrated by Rangasamy et al.
(2019) in their list of herpetofauna of the Andaman and
Nicobar Islands.
Received: 19.12.2019
Accepted: 08.04.2020
Faunal surveys spanning 10-15 days were conduct-
ed on islands of the Nicobar archipelago intermittent-
ly between 2015 and 2018. Two of three specimens of
L. macrotympanum recorded during these surveys were
collected, preserved and deposited in the holdings of
the Zoological Survey of India, Andaman and Nicobar
Regional Centre (ZSI ANRC). The collected specimens
were measured with a vernier caliper and a Leica stereo-
microscope to the nearest 0.1 mm. The following charac-
ters were recorded: Snout tip to vent (SVL), trunk length
from axilla to groin (AG), tail length from vent to tail tip
(TL), head length (HL), head width at jaw angle (HW),
head depth (HD), eye diameter (ED), tympanum diame-
ter (TYD), eye-nostril distance (EN), eye-snout distance
(ES), eye-tympanum distance (ETY), forelimb length
(FLL), hindlimb length (HLL), inclusive of femur length
(from groin to knee) (FEL) and tibia length (from knee to
heel) (TBL), finger lengths (F1—F5), toe lengths (T1—TS5),
midbody scale-rows (MSR), nuchals (NU), supralabials
(SL), infralabials (IL), ventrals (V), supraoculars (SO),
prefrontals (PRF), subdigital lamellae under toe IV. Sex
of the specimens was determined by examining the clo-
acal region for the presence of hemipenes. Geographic
coordinates of the areas of its occurrence were recorded
with a GPS and mapped with ARC MAP 10. Terminolo-
gies for color descriptions follow Poyarkov et al. (2019).
Corresponding editor: W. Bohme
Published: 19.04.2020
118 G. Gokulakrishnan et al.
Lipinia macrotympanum (Stoliczka, 1873)
(Figs 1—2)
Mocoa macrotympanum Stoliczka, 1873
Lygosoma macrotympanum — Boulenger (1890)
Leiolopisma macrotympanum — Smith (1935)
Lygosoma quadrivittatum (non Peters, 1867) — Biswas &
Sanyal (1977)
Lipinia macrotympanum — Greer (1974); Das (1997);
Das & Austin (2007)
Lipinia macrotympana — Das (1999) sic.
INDIA — 1 adult male (ZSI/ANRC/T/3709); Shastri
Nagar; 6.810° N, 93.892° E; 37 m a.s.l.; G. Gokulakrish-
nan leg. 11 Oct. 2015. 1 adult male (ZSI/ANRC/T/4330);
Galathea; 6.8216° N, 93.8673° E; 37 m a.s.l.; G. Goku-
lakrishnan leg. 20 Nov. 2016.
L. macrotympanum is a small species of Lipinia from the
Nicobar Islands, that can be diagnosed and characterized
by: the presence of a large and exposed tympanic mem-
brane; 7 supralabials; 6 infralabials; presence of a large,
transparent disc on the lower eyelid; a single broad pre-
frontal with a median constriction or two separated pre-
frontals (fide Das, 1997); two, nearly equal sized loreals;
a single, undivided frontoparietal; 4 supraoculars; a pair
of enlarged preanal scales; 21-23 midbody scale rows;
51-53 paravertebrals; 60-62 ventrals; 16-17 subdigi-
tal lamellae under toe IV; SVL 36.5-45 mm; tail 43.9—
50 mm; dorsal coloration of black with three yellow lon-
gitudinal stripes from snout to vent; tail red or reddish
brown (based on the collected specimens and Das, 1997).
The newly collected material, two adult males, mea-
sure 38.5-39.6 mm SVL; overall habitus slender and
elongated. Head short (HL:SVL 0.12); slightly longer
than broad (HL: HW 1.02) with a pointed snout tip in both
dorsal and lateral views. Nostrils located laterally, closer
to the snout tip than to the eyes (EN:ES 0.7). Rostral visi-
ble from above; frontonasal broader than long; prefrontal
single in ZSI/ANRC/T/3709; *8’ shaped, with a median
constriction; two small rhomboidal prefrontals, in con-
tact with each other in ZSI/ANRC/T/4330; frontal wedge
shaped; frontoparietal single; interparietal fairly elongat-
ed; parietals large; in contact with each other; three pairs
of broad nuchals present. Paravertebrals slightly broader
than the adjacent body scales. Supraoculars four; third
largest; lower eyelid with a transparent disc. Loreals two,
trapezoidal in shape and nearly of equal size. Temporals
large and smooth. Supralabials 7, 6" largest; infralabials
6. Tympanic opening large (TYD:ED 0.66) with a visi-
ble eardrum, lacking auricular lobules. Mental semicir-
cular; a single large postmental. Anterior chin-shields in
contact with each other; posterior chin-shields separated
by a single scale. Midbody scale rows 21—23:; smooth.
Limbs fairly well developed. Relative length of fingers
IV>IN>H>V>I. Thigh short (FEL:SVL 0.12); tibia as
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 117-122
Table 1. Measurements of the examined Lipinia macrotympa-
num specimens compared with literature.
ZSVANRC/ ZSI/ANRC/ _ Das (1997)
T/ 4330 T/ 3709
Total Length 92'5 89.8 80.4-91.7
SVL 38.7 37.6 36.5-38.1
TL 53.8 52.2 43.9-53.6
AG 24 23.8 20.2-21.3
HL 48 4.7 5.8
HW 47 46 3.7-3.9
ES 2.9 Zen 2.7-2.9
EN 2 1.9 1.5-1.6
NS 1.3 1.1 —
ED 1.8 ie! 1.3-1.8
TYD 1.2 1.1 1.0-1.1
IN i) 1.4 1.3-1.7
IO 4 3.8 1.3-1.7
FLL 10.11 9.8 8.4
FEL 46 4.5 =
TBL 46 4.5 ce
Paravertebrals 51 53 =
Ventrals 60 62 62
MSR 23 21 21-23
T4 lamellae 15 16 15-17
NU 6 6 6
long as thighs (FEL:TBL 1.0); foot slightly longer. Toe
IV longest; relative length of toes TV >II>V >II>I; toe
IV with 15 smooth subdigital lamellae; claws long and
protruding. Measurements of the material studied are
presented in table 1.
Dorsal coloration black to dark brown anteriorly; fad-
ing posteriorly to light brown with a reddish brown tail
in ZSI/ANRC/T/3709. Dorsum with three yellow stripes;
the mid dorsal light stripe (MDLS) originating from the
snout and broadening as it proceeds posteriorly towards
the sacrum. The other specimen, ZSI/ANRC/T/4330 was
golden brown overall, with just the head and neck bear-
ing the dark coloration. Two paravertebral dark stripes
(PVDS) commencing from post ocular region, continu-
ing till the sacrum, beyond which it merges with the uni-
formly reddish brown coloured tail; stripes not discern-
ible posteriorly. Lateral body and limbs orange colored.
Lateral dark stripe (LDS) and ventrolateral dark stripes
(VLDS) absent. Dark temporal marking (DTM) present
in all the samples. Venter uniform creamy white. Under-
side of tail reddish. The coloration of ZSI/ANRC/T/4330
©ZFMK
New records of Lipinia macrotympanum 119
ey
Et
Fig. 1. Lipinia macrotympanum in \ife. A-B. ZSI/ANRC/T/4330 from Galathea. C. ZSI/ANRC/T/3709 from Shastri
Nagar.
reported herein has not been known until now. Illustra-
tion of this species published by Das (2002) conforms to
the coloration of ZSI/ANRC/T/3709.
The first individual recorded from Shastri Nagar (ZSI/
ANRC/T/3709) was found near an old building, and was
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 117-122
seen actively moving and approaching the observers after
dusk at ca. 19:43 h. The immediate vicinity if this spot is
bordered by evergreen forests and a stream to the west
and a sandy beach to the south. The second and third in-
dividuals from Galathea were observed on the ground:
©ZFMK
120 G. Gokulakrishnan et al.
Fig. 2. Head of Lipinia macrotympanum ZS\/AN-
RC/T/3709. A. Dorsal view. B. Lateral view. C. Ventral
view.
the specimen collected (ZSI/ANRC/T/4330) was found
resting under a dry palm leaf post noon at ca. 15:18 h.
The third, uncollected individual was found foraging on
the ground, at the camp site near the tent in Feb 2016.
This region (Galathea) is surrounded by Casuarina
groves bordering a stretch of a sandy beach near the Gal-
athea River delta. The habitat of this region is generally
characterized by reduced canopy cover, low leaf-litter
and sandy soil situated close to the sea coast with strand
vegetation.
From congeners, Lipinia macrotympanum can be dis-
tinguished as follows (data for comparison modified from
Das & Austin 2007 and Poyarkov et al. 2019): presence
of an externally visible tympanic membrane (vs. hidden
in L. sekayuensis;, L. inexpectata and L. surda), dorsum
with a pattern of longitudinal stripes (vs, absent in L. sur-
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 117-122
da and faint stripes in L. sekayuensis),; 16-17 subdigi-
tal lamellae under toe IV (vs. 19-23 in L. albodorsalis,
18-25 in L. infralineolata,; 7-10 in L. leptosoma, 19 in
L. longiceps;, 21 in L. miangensis; 20-21 in L. occiden-
talis, 24—31 in L. pulchella; 22 in L. pulchra;, 18-21 in
L. rabori; 18 in L. relicta,; 22—26 in L. rouxii; 19-21 in
L. semperi;, 18—22 in L. septentrionalis, 19-21 in L. ven-
emai, 25 in L. vittigera. Three pairs of nuchals present
in L. macrotympanum (vs. five pairs in L. cheesmanae;
2 pairs in L. inexpectata), 21-23 midbody scalerows in
L. macrotympanum (vs. 22—25 in L. albodorsalis, L. au-
riculata, 28 in L. cheesmanae, 22—26 in L. leptosoma, 24
in L. longiceps and L. miangensis, 24—28 in L. noctua;
24-25 in L. notolineata; 24—26 in L. occidentalis, 22—26
in L. pulchella; 24 in L. pulchra; 22-28 in L. rouxi, 24—26
in L. septentrionalis, 24—26 in L. venemai; 28 in L. vittig-
era and L. vassilievi;, 32 in L. vulcania; 24 in L. zamboan-
gensis, 28-32 in L. microcercus and L. trivittata.
Lipinia macrotympanum has been one of the most
poorly known skink species in the Andaman and Nicobar
archipelago, which has been recorded only three times
since its description in 1873 (Biswas & Sanyal 1977; Das
1997; Rangasamy et al., 2014). Other herpetofaunal sur-
veys (e.g., Vijayakumar 2005, Harikriahnan et al. 2008,
2014) did not record L. macrotympanum. The present ob-
servations of L. macrotympanum reported here are from
the southern extremity of Great Nicobar and are at least
35—40 km south of the closest previously known locality
from Great Nicobar (1.e., Campbell Bay fide Biswas &
Sanyal, 1977) thereby extending its distribution range
further south. Das (1997) stated that the individual re-
corded by him was also seen on the sand, moving with
great agility. L. macrotympanum being active after dusk
reported here is novel information as earlier authors have
all recorded it during the day time. The individuals re-
ported here were also seen on the ground as reported by
Das (1997). The type locality of this species, Macpher-
son’s Strait lies between the southern tip of South An-
daman and Rutland Island. There have been no reports
of this species from any of the islands in the Andaman
archipelago since its original description. All of the sub-
sequent reports (Biswas & Sanyal 1977, Das 1997, this
work) have been from the southern group of islands in
the Nicobar archipelago, 1.e., Little and Great Nicobar
Islands, situated to the south of the Sombrero Channel.
The Andaman Islands, situated in the north of the ten-de-
gree channel are biogeographically different from those
of the Nicobar Islands and their fauna show a more In-
do-Chinese faunal affinity (Das 1999). It is speculated
that the type locality of L. macrotympanum mentioned
by Stoliczka (1873) could be inaccurate and the species
may not actually occur in the Andaman Islands. The pos-
sible absence of Lipinia in the Andaman Islands 1s further
supported by the fact that it has never been recorded from
islands of the Andaman archipelago after the report by
Stoliczka (1873) although several herpetofaunal surveys
©ZFMK
New records of Lipinia macrotympanum 121
92°0'0"E 94°0'0"E 95°0'0"E 96°0'0"E
93°0'0"E
13°30'0"N
13°30'0"'N
10°30'0"N 11°30'0"N 12°30'0"N
9°30'0"N 10°30'0"N 11°30'0"'N 12°30'0"N
9°30'0"N
RIN" N
Nicobar Islands
8°30'0"N
------Sombrero Channel------
7°30'0"N
P3ANON
0 25 50 100 Kilometers
92°0'0"E 93°0'0"E 94°0'0"E 95°0'0"E 96°0'0"E
93°30'0"E 94°0'0"E
Pulo Ulon
\
70'0"N
7°0'0"'N
Shastri
Nagar
12 Kilometers
93°30'0"E 94°0'0"E
Fig. 3. Type locality (Macpherson’s Strait) of Lipinia macrotympanum: Literature records (red dots) and new locality
records (black dots) in Great and Little Nicobar Islands.
have been and are still being carried out in the Andaman
archipelago (e.g., Das, 1999; Harikrishnan et al., 2014:
Rangasamy et al., 2014; pers. obs.). Similarly, there have
been some intriguing records of certain species which
were mentioned in older literature from certain regions,
but have never been recorded from such localities sub-
sequently. Examples include Lycodon tiwarii from May-
abunder, North Andaman, Oligodon woodmasoni from
Andamans for both of which, confirmed current records
are only from the Nicobar Islands (Vijayakumar & Da-
vid 2006) and Hemidactylus platyurus which was once
reported from Great Nicobar (Tiwari & Biswas 1973) but
is presently known from the Andaman Islands, and not
Nicobars.
Based on the observations reported until now, we rec-
ommend to regard L. macrotympanum as an endangered
species based on the criteria B1 (Extent of occurrence
less than 5000 km?) and B2 (Area of occupancy less than
500 km?) of IUCN. Further studies are required to better
understand the ecology of this poorly known, narrowly
endemic species.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 117-122
Acknowledgements. We thank the Department of Environ-
ment and Forests, Andaman and Nicobar Islands for permis-
sion and for the infrastructure provided. GGK and CS thank
the Director, ZSI, Kolkata for the support and encouragement;
SRC thanks K. V. Devi Prasad and the faculty of the Dept. of
Ecology and Environmental Sciences and the Dept. of Ocean
studies and Marine Biology, Pondicherry University for the
support extended. Constructive comments by the reviewers are
appreciated.
REFERENCES
Biswas S, Sanyal DP (1977) Notes on the Reptilia collection
from the Great Nicobar Island during the Great Nicobar Ex-
pedition in 1966. Rec. Zool. Surv. India 72: 107-124
Boulenger GA (1890) The Fauna of British India, Including
Ceylon and Burma. Reptilia and Batrachia. Taylor & Francis,
London, xviii
Das I (1997) Rediscovery of Lipinia macrotympanum
(Stoliczka, 1873) from the Nicobar Islands, India. Asiatic
Herpetol. Res. 7: 23—26
Das I (1999) Biogeography of the amphibians and reptiles of
the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. Pp. 43-77 in: Ota
H. (ed.) Tropical Island herpetofauna. Origin, current diver-
sity and current status. Elsevier
©ZFMK
122 G. Gokulakrishnan et al.
Das I, Austin C (2007) New Species of Lipinia (Squamata:
Scincidae) from Borneo, Revealed by Molecular and Mor-
phological Data. J. Herpetol. 41: 61—71
Greer AE (1974) The generic relationships of the scincid lizard
genus Leiolopisma and its relatives. Australian J. Zool. (Sup-
plement Series) 31: 1-67
Harikriahnan S, Choudhury BC, Vasudevan K (2008) Assess-
ment and inventory of herpetofaunal diversity of Nicobar Is-
lands, India. Report: Wildlife Institute of India: 42
Harikriahnan S, Vasudevan K, Das A, Choudhury BC, Dutta
SK, Das I (2014) Macroecology of Terrestrial Herpetofauna
in Andaman & Nicobar Archipelago. Report: Wildlife Insti-
tute of India: 49
Poyarkov Jr. NA, Geissler P, GorinVA, Dunayev EA, Hartmann
T, Suwannapoom C. (2019). Counting stripes: revision of the
Lipinia vittigera complex (Reptilia, Squamata, Scincidae)
with description of two new species from Indochina. Zool.
Res. 40: 358-393
Rangasamy V, Chandra K, Ragunathan C, Venkataraman K.
(2014) Amphibians and reptiles in Andaman and Nicobar
Islands: Diversity and Distribution. Online at http://www.
upsbdb.org/pdf/Souvenir2014/ch-18.pdf
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 117-122
Rangasamy V, Sivaperuman C, Gokulakrishnan G, Parthipan P
(2018) Herpetofauna of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Pp.
37-56 in: Sivaperuman C. & Sivaperuman K. Venkataraman
(eds) Indian hotspots. Springer Nature Singapore
Smith, MA (1935) The fauna of British India, including Ceylon
and Burma. Reptilia and Amphibia, Vol.2, Sauria, Taylor and
Francis, London
Stoliczka F (1873) Note on some Andamanese and Nicobarese
reptiles, with the description of three new species of lizards.
J. Asiatic Soc. Bengal 92 (3): 162-169
Tiwari KK, Biswas S (1973) Two new reptiles from the Great
Nicobar Island. J. Zool. Soc. India. 25(1 & 2): 57-63
Uetz P, Freed P, HoSek J (eds) (2019) The Reptile Database.
Online at http:/(\www.reptile-database.org [last accessed 12
Dec. 2019]
Vijayakumar SP, David P (2006) Taxonomy, natural history and
distribution of the snakes of Nicobar Islands (India), based
on new materials and with an emphasis on endemic species.
Russ. J. Herpetol. 13 (1): 11-40
Vijayakumar SP (2005) Status and distribution of Amphibians
and Reptiles of the Nicobar Islands, India. Final Report. Ruf-
ford Foundation / Madras Crocodile Bank / Wildlife Institute
of India: 48
©ZFMK
ISSN 2190-7307
http://www.zoologicalbulletin.de
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 123-130
2020 - Gorczyca J. et al.
https://do1.org/10.20363/BZB-2020.69.1.123
Research article
urn:|sid:zoobank.org: pub:8840C9B5-072C-4E04-B9F5-604AFD149E76
The first record of the genus Fulvius Stal, 1862
(Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae)
from continental China with description of a new species
Jacek Gorezyca', Andrzej Wolsk? & Artur Taszakowski° *
!3 Institute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Natural Sciences,
SY, SY ly
University of Silesia in Katowice, Bankowa 9, 40-007 Katowice, Poland
? Institute of Biology, University of Opole, Oleska 22, 45-052 Opole, Poland
* Corresponding author: Email: artur.taszakowski@us.edu.pl
'urn:|sid:zoobank.org:author:6E164D8D-B7D1-48E3-B771-C36E211AB7DC
> urn:Isid:zoobank.org:author:author:845C8DAF-B265-4C4E-954E-6B8C44A EA 27B
3urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author: BB6E3 148-D9BC-4DC1-A212-E99ECS5F96E28
Abstract. A new species of the genus Fulvius Stal, 1862 (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae: Fulviini) is described based on
a couple of specimens collected in Yunnan Province in SW China. The genus is also reported from continental China for
the first time. Detailed illustrations of the tarsi, the distribution of trichobothria on the metafemur and male genitalia are
given, and an image of the dorsal habitus is presented.
Key words. Asia, biodiversity, new species, plant bugs, taxonomy, true bugs, Yunnan Province.
INTRODUCTION
Fulvius Stal, 1862 is known as one of the most speciose
genera within the subfamily Cylapinae, with more than
80 valid species worldwide (Wolski et al. 2018). Nev-
ertheless, the state of the knowledge about this genus
is probably far from being complete. Most species oc-
cur in the New World and the Afrotropical and Oriental
Regions. Only a few species are known from the Aus-
tralian Region and very few have been described from
the Palearctic Region (Gorczyca 2006). Little is known
about the biology of the congeners. While most members
of Fulvius are frequently collected using UV light traps,
some of them are saproxylic and have been found on fall-
en decaying wood or often on fungi, sucking the fungal
hyphae (Gossner & Damken 2018; Kim et al. 2019). On
the other hand, some of them are carnivorous (Yasunaga
& Miyamoto 2006; Pluot-Sigwalt & Cherot 2013).
While examining some material housed in the Depart-
ment of Entomology at the National Museum of Natural
History, Prague, Czech Republic, two specimens of the
genus Fulvius, collected in Yunnan Province of SW Chi-
na were found. These were confirmed as representing an
undescribed species of Fu/vius, which 1s described in this
paper. This discovery also reveals the first distributional
record for the genus from continental China.
Received: 06.01.2020
Accepted: 14.05.2020
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The specimens were imaged using the following equip-
ment: a Leica M205C stereo microscope with a Leica
DFC495 digital camera and Leica application suite 4.9.0
software; a Leica DM 3000 upright light microscope
with a Leica MC 190 HD digital camera and Leica Ap-
plication Suite 4.12.0 software and an Olympus upright
light microscope with a Canon EOS 750D digital cam-
era. SEM photographs were obtained using a Phenom XL
field emission scanning electron microscope at 10 and
15 kV accelerating voltages using a BackScatter Detector
(BSD). Measurements were taken with Leica applica-
tion suite 4.9.0 software and are presented in millime-
tres (mm). The total body length is defined as the length
from the apex of the clypeus to the posterior margin of
the membrane. The measured body parts were defined in
Wolski (2015). Genitalia were kept in 10% KOH solution
before dissection, and the female genitalia were stained
with chlorazol-black. The terminology of the male geni-
talic structures follows Kerzhner & Konstantinov (1999),
Konstantinov (2003) and Cassis (2008), and the termi-
nology of the female genitalia follows Davis (1955), Sa-
dowska-Woda et al. (2006) and Pluot-Sigwalt & Matocq
(2017).
Corresponding editor: M. Espeland
Published: 04.06.2020
124 Jacek Gorezyca et al.
RESULTS
Taxonomy
Fulvius yunnanicus sp. nov.
urn: lsid:zoobank.org:act: E4C62668-C84B-4407-B895-9F 54F2268ECO
Type material
Holotype (<). China, Yunnan Prov., 1.8 km W Zizhi
vill., 2.vil. 2016, 25°44.7' N, 98°33.6' E, 2005 m a.s.l.,
from large dead tree stumps, J. Hajek & J. RUzi¢ka leg.:
collection of the National Museum Praha, Czech Repub-
lic. Paratype (2). Same data as for holotype; both are
preserved in the Department of Entomology, the National
Museum, Prague, Czech Republic.
Diagnosis. The new species belongs to the anthocoroi-
des-group (see discussion below) and can be distin-
guished from other members of the group by the follow-
ing combination of characters: pronotum dark brown
with three brown longitudinal stripes spanning its whole
length; antennal segments I-II dark brown to black with
contrastingly yellow apical 1/4; legs entirely brown
(Fig. 1); endosoma with large, oval sclerotized lobe api-
cally (Fig. 4C); bursa copulatrix with ring-like sclerite
situated near base of the seminal depository; sclerotized
rings weakly developed (Fig. 5A).
Most similar to F} mateusi Sadowska-Woda & Gorczy-
ca, 2008, F. nigricornis Poppius, 1909 and F: tagalicus
Poppius, 1914 in sharing the uniformly coloured hemely-
tron. & yunnanicus can, however, be easily distinguished
from these species by having the pronotum with brown,
longitudinal patches along entire length (Fig. 1) and the
presence of the oval sclerotized lobe in the endosoma
(Fig. 4C) (see remarks below).
DESCRIPTION
Male
Colouration (Fig. 1). Dorsum, pale brown with darker,
mostly dark brown areas.
Head. Dark brown, tinged with yellow, first and sec-
ond segment vary from dark brown to nearly black,
second segment contrastingly yellow apically, third and
fourth segments dark brown; labium brown, last segment
dark brown.
Thorax. Pronotal collar. Brown. Pronotum. Dark
brown with two brown longitudinal stripes. Mesoscutum
and scutellum. Dark brown, scutellum pale at apex. Tho-
racic pleura. Proepimeron, mesepisternum and mese-
pimeron dark brown almost black. Hemelytron. Pale
brown, partly translucent, exocorium slightly tinged
with red; clavus pale brown at base, dark brown in apical
part with large dark brown and reddish patch contiguous
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 123-130
1mm
Fig. 1. Fulvius yunnanicus sp. nov., holotype, dorsal view.
with clavus and membrane; cuneus dark brown, paler at
apex; membrane grey, venation dark grey. Large areolar
cell triangular; small areolar cell very small. Legs. Pale
brown, femora in apical part slightly tinged with red.
Abdomen. Chestnut to dark brown.
Structure, texture and vestiture. Dorsum matte, cov-
ered with fine, pale, very short closely fitting, scale-like
setae.
Head. Eyes contiguous with pronotal collar; first and
second antennal segments covered with dark, short setae
(Figs 1-2); second segment slightly thickened towards
apex; third and fourth segments very thin, covered with
pale, long, protruding setae. Labium reaches beyond
metacoxae (Fig. 2C).
©ZFMK
Fulvius yunnanicus sp. nov. 125
Fig. 2. Fulvius yunnanicus sp. nov., holotype, front part of the body. A. Dorsal view; B. Ventral view; C. Lateral view.
Thorax. Pronotum. Anterior lobe of pronotum only Legs. Relatively long (Fig. 1), covered with very short
slightly convex with thin longitudinal sulcus medially — setae, much shorter than diameter of tibiae; metafemora
(Fig. 2A). with nine trichobothria (Fig. 3C—E); tarsi two-segment-
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 123-130 ©ZFMK
126 Jacek Gorezyca et al.
Fig. 3. Fulvius yunnanicus sp. nov. A. Paratype, metatarsus; B.
metafemur; D—E. Details of the structure of the trichobothria.
ed, second segment not divided; claws with distinct sub-
apical tooth (Fig. 3AB). Hemelytron. Major cell triangu-
lar, minor cell very small.
Male genitalia (Fig. 4). Typical of anthocoroides
group (Gorczyca 2002; Sadowska-Woda et al. 2008:
Wolski et al. 2018, also see discussion below). Right
paramere. Apical process thin and relatively long; spine
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 123-130
Claws in details; C. Holotype, distribution of trichobothria on the
on inner surface of paramere body indistinct. Aedeagus.
Sclerotized part of seminal duct broadened apically; en-
dosoma with strongly developed, arcuate sclerite and
large, elliptical sclerotised lobe on apical half.
©ZFMK
Fulvius yunnanicus sp. nov. 127
Fig. 4. Fulvius yunnanicus sp. nov., holotype, male genitalia. A. Right paramere; B. Left paramere; C. Lateral view of endosoma;
D. Dorsal view.
Female
Similar to male in colouration, structure, texture and ves-
titure.
Female genitalia (Fig. 5). Genital chamber (or bursa
copulatrix) rounded; lateral oviducts short, slightly broad
apically, ring-like sclerite near basal part of seminal de-
pository rounded, protruding, prominent, broadly devel-
oped; sclerotized ring situated laterally, indistinct; poste-
rior wall with wrinkled interramal sclerite; membranous
structure present between gonapophysis I.
Measurements (mm). 4/9 (holotype measurements
first)
Body. Length 4.09/4.10, width 1.36/1.36.
Head. Length of head 0.79/0.79, width 0.61/0.66, dor-
sal width of eye 0.17/0.18, width of vertex 0.27/0.28.
Antenna. Length of segment I 0.51/0.52, II 1.14/1.19,
III 0.51/0.51, [TV 0.50/ missing in 9.
Labium (unmeasurable in specimens examined).
Pronotum. Length 0.61/0.63, length of lateral margins
0.67/0.77, length of anterior margins 0.51/0.52, length of
posterior margins 1.14/1.37
Distribution. China, Yunnan Province (Fig. 6).
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 123-130
Etymology. The specific epithet refers to the Chinese
province Yunnan where the specimens were collected.
Remarks. Gorczyca (2002), Sadowska-Woda et al.
(2008) and Wolski et al. (2018) summarized the morpho-
logical characters that define the three species groups that
are currently found in the genus Ful/vius Stal, 1862: the
anthocoroides, bifenestratus, and bisbistillatus groups.
The presented new species can easily be classified as a
member of the anthocoroides group as it has the follow-
ing characters: a) dorsum matte, covered with uniformly
distributed setae (Fig. 1; Wolski et al. 2018: figs 41-44);
b) second tarsomere not subdivided medially, subapical
tooth present (Fig. 3A—B; Wolski et al. 2018: figs 45-46);
c) the aperture of the pygophore is oriented posteriorly,
with long dorsal wall (Wolski et al. 2018: figs 47-48);
d) the parameres are similar in size, the right paramere
has a relatively thick paramere body and a thin and short
apical process; the left paramere has a relatively long
apical process with a subapical incision (Fig 4A—B; Car-
valho and Lorenzato 1978: figs 56-57, 68-69; Gorczyca
2002: figs 1-4; Pluot-Sigwalt & Chérot 2013: fig. 4B—C;
Yasunaga 2000: figs 23-24, 28-29; Yasunaga and Wolski
2017: figs 3A—B); e) endosoma with sclerites or sclero-
tized appendages; the sclerotized portion of the seminal
©ZFMK
128 Jacek Gorezyca et al.
0.1 mm
Fig. 5. Fulvius yunnanicus sp. nov., paratype, female genitalia: A-B. Genital chamber (or bursa copulatrix). A. Dorsal view; B.
Posterior wall, anterior view; C. Gonapophysis I and adjacent structures, dorsal view; D. Gonapophysis I and adjacent structures,
right lateral view. m = membranous structure adjunct to gonapophysis I; odl = lateral oviduct; sc = ring-like sclerite near basal part
of seminal depository; sd = seminal depository; sr = sclerotized ring.
duct is well developed, long and tubular (Fig. 4C—D;
Carvalho & Lorenzato 1978: fig. 55; Pluot-Sigwalt &
Chérot 2013: fig. 4A; Yasunaga 2000: fig. 30; Yasunaga
& Wolski 2017: fig. 3C) and f) a membranous structure
is present between the gonapophysis I (Fig. 5C—D; Sad-
owska-Woda et al. 2008).
Within the anthocoroides group F: yunnanicus sp. nov.
is most similar to the Oriental F? mateusi Sadowska-Wo-
da & Gorczyca, 2008, F. nigricornis Poppius, 1909
and F. tagalicus Poppius, 1914 . All these species have
uniformly coloured hemelytron (e.g., Yasunaga 2000:
fig. 19), not having any pale patch basally as it is found
for example in F’ anthocoroides (Reuter, 1875), F: dim-
idiatus (Poppius, 1909) or F) ussuriensis Kerzhner, 1973
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 123-130
(e.g., Yasunaga 2000: figs 18, 22; Yasunaga & Wolski
2017: fig. 2C). The present new species can, however,
be easily distinguished from F) mateusi, F. nigricornis
and F) tagalicus by having the pronotum with brown,
longitudinal patches along entire length (Fig. 1) and the
presence of the oval sclerotized lobe in the endosoma
(Fig. 4C). From F) mateusi F- yunnanicus sp. nov. can be
also distinguished by the antennal segment II with con-
trastingly yellow annulation apically (Fig. 1) (antennal
segment IT is uniformly dark brown in F’ mateusi) and the
presence of the ring-like sclerite near base of the seminal
depository (Fig. 5A) which is lacking in F? mateusi (Sad-
owska-Woda & Gorczyca 2008: fig. 6).
©ZFMK
Fulvius yunnanicus sp. nov. 129
Fig. 6. Distribution of Fulvius yunnanicus sp. nov.
Acknowledgements. We express our sincere thanks to Petr
Kment (Department of Entomology, National Museum, Prague,
Czech Republic) for the loan of the material. We also thank two
anonymous reviewers for their useful comments and suggestion
on earlier versions of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
Carvalho JCM, Lorenzato LM (1978) The Cylapinae of Papua
New Guinea (Hemiptera, Miridae). Revista Brasileira de Bi-
ologia 38: 121-149
Cassis G (2008) The Lattinova complex of Austromirine Plant
Bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Miridae: Orthotylinae). Pro-
ceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 110:
845-939
Davis NT (1955) Morphology of the female organs of repro-
duction in the Miridae (Hemiptera). Annals of the Entomo-
logical Society of America 48: 132—150
Gorezyca J (2002) Notes on the genus Fulvius Stal from the
Oriental Region and New Guinea (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cy-
lapinae). Genus 13 (1): 9-23
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 123-130
Gorczyca J (2006) The catalogue of the subfamily Cylapinae
Kirkaldy, 1903 of the world (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Miri-
dae). Monographs of the Upper Silesian Museum 5: 1—100
Gossner MM, Damken C (2018) Diversity and ecology of sap-
roxylic Hemiptera. Pp. 263-317 in: Ulyshen MD (ed.) Sap-
roxylic insects: diversity, ecology and conservation. Spring-
er, Heidelberg
Kerzhner IM, Konstantinov FV (1999) Structure of the aedea-
gus in Miridae (Heteroptera) and its bearing to supragener-
ic classification. Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemicae 63:
117-137
Kim J, Lim J, Jung S (2019) A taxonomic review of the fun-
gal-inhabiting plant bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Miridae:
Cylapinae) from the Korean Peninsula. Journal of Asia-Pa-
cific Biodiversity 12: 249-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/
jjapb.2019.01.006
Konstantinov FV (2003) Male genitalia in Miridae (Heterop-
tera) and their significance for suprageneric classification of
the family. Part 1: general review, Isometopinae and Psallopi-
nae. Belgian Journal of Entomology 5: 3-6
Pluot-Sigwalt D, Chérot F (2013) Donées biologiques et anato-
miques, régime alimentaire et taxonomie d'un nouveau Ful-
©ZFMK
130 Jacek Gorezyca et al.
vius afrotropical (Insecta, Heteroptera, Miridae, Cylapinae,
Fulviini). Zoosystema 35 (1): 45-68. https://doi.org/10.5252/
72013n1a5
Pluot-Sigwalt D, Matocq A (2017) An investigation of the roof
of the genital chamber in female plant-bugs with special
emphasis on the “dorsal sac” (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Mi-
ridae). Annales de la Société entomologique de France (N.S.)
Sadowska-Woda I, Chérot F, Malm T (2008) A preliminary
phylogenetic analysis of the genus Fulvius Stal (Hemip-
tera: Miridae: Cylapinae) based on molecular data. In-
sect Systematics and Evolution 39: 407-417. https://do1.
org/10.1163/18763120878878429 |
Sadowska-Woda I, Chérot F, Gorczyca J (2006) Contribution
to the study of the female genitalia of twelve Fulvius species
(Heteroptera, Miridae, Cylapinae). Denisia 19: 617-636
Sadowska-Woda I, Gorezyca J (2008) Fulvius mateusi a new
species of Cylapinae from the Oriental Region (Hemiptera:
Miridae: Cylapinae). Genus 19 (1): 15-19
Wolski A (2015) Revision of the plant bug genus Xenocylapus
Bergroth (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae), with
a description of Henryfulvius gracilis —a new cylapine genus
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 123-130
and species from Ecuador. Annales de la Société entomolo-
gique de France (N.S.) 50 (3-4): 311-335. https://doi.org/
10.1080/00379271.2014.990251
Wolski A, Gorczyca J, Yasunaga T, Jindra Z, Herczek A (2018)
Taxonomic review of the bifenestratus species group of the
genus Fulvius Stal with descriptions of two new species (He-
miptera, Heteroptera, Miridae, Cylapinae). ZooKeys 796:
107-129. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.796.21293
Yasunaga T (2000) The mirid subfamily Cylapinae (Heter-
optera: Miridae) or fungal inhabiting plant bugs in Japan.
Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 143: 183-209. https://do1.
org/10.1163/22119434-99900044
Yasunaga T, Miyamoto S (2006) Second report on the Japanese
cylapine plant bugs (Heteroptera, Miridae, Cylapinae), with
descriptions of five new species. Pp. 721—735 in: Rabitsch W.
(ed.) Hug the bug — For love of true bugs. Festschrift zum 70.
Geburstag von Ernst Heiss. Denisia 19
Yasunaga T, Wolski A (2017) A new species and a new synon-
ymy of the plant bug genus Fu/vius from Japan (Hemiptera:
Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae). Zootaxa 4232 (4): 588—
592. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4232.4.10
©ZFMK
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 131-140
2020 - Chandramouli S.R. et al.
https://do1.org/10.20363/BZB-2020.69.1.131
ISSN 2190-7307
http://www.zoologicalbulletin.de
Research article
urn:|sid:zoobank.org:pub:34 DFDE32-0BD3-4C49-8B25-87A82FA918A9
Status and distribution of the little-known and elusive Nicobarese worm lizard
Dibamus nicobaricum (Fitzinger in Steindachner, 1867)
(Squamata: Dibamidae)
S.R. Chandramouli'’, G. Gokulakrishnan’” & C. Sivaperuman*
' Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Pondicherry University, Puducherry
?3 Zoological Survey of India, Andaman and Nicobar Regional Centre, Haddo, Port Blair
* Corresponding author: Email: findthesnakeman@gmail.com
'urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:73 BF7214-77B 1-45EA-A7FB-8CB13D15094F
2urn:Isid:zoobank.org:author:81676BC5-F41F-4A8A-853 1-FF9CBB282843
3urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:08F28A 1 0-E80D-420C-924 1 -24F5CC199EB6
Abstract. Field surveys were carried out to record the elusive and little-known fossorial Nicobarese worm lizard Dibamus
nicobaricum (Fitzinger in Steindachner, 1867) on seven of the 23 islands of the Nicobar archipelago. It was recorded
from three new localities, two in Great Nicobar and the other from Teressa Island, extending the northern and southern
boundaries of its distribution significantly. One of the individuals, a subadult male recorded during this study happens
to be the smallest one ever recorded, measuring just 70 mm SVL. A predictive distribution model was developed based
on the geo-coordinates of its occurrence with a reliable prediction of 25—100% probability on islands of the central and
southern group of the Nicobar archipelago, diminishing to 12—25% on Car Nicobar, situated to the north. The Area Under
the Curve (AUC) of the model was 0.907, indicating a reliable prediction. Status of D. nicobaricum was assessed for the
first time as per the IUCN guidelines which reveal that it has to be considered as an endangered species based on its narrow
distribution range.
Key words. Nicobar worm-lizard, Dibamus nicobaricum, distribution, status, MA XENT model.
INTRODUCTION
Dibamids are one among the oldest living group of squa-
mate reptiles (Pyron et al. 2013). The genus Dibamus
Dumeéeril and Bibron, 1839 currently has 24 species (Uetz
et al. 2020) of which Dibamus nicobaricum (Fitzinger
in Steindachner, 1867) is one among the earliest known
species. The holotype was collected by G.R. Frauenfeld
from “Nicobars” during the global voyage of the Austri-
an Frigate “SMS Novara” and described originally by
Fitzinger in Steindachner (1867) as Rhinophidion nico-
baricum. In the same publication, Steindachner (1867)
reported on similarities between Rhinophidion Fitzing-
er, 1967 and Typhloscincus Peters, 1864 resulting in the
transfer of the species nicobaricum to Typhloscincus.
Later Stoliczka (1873) attributed this species to the genus
Dibamus Duméril & Bibron, 1839 where it is currently
placed. Dibamids, being fossorial and small bodied or-
ganisms, have remained extremely elusive and hence, not
many records of most species exist.
The Nicobar worm-lizard Dibamus nicobaricum has
been reported only a very few times since its original de-
scription. Stoliczka (1873) considered Dibamus nicobar-
icum to be a synonym of Zyphloscincus Martensii Peters,
Received: 11.09.2019
Accepted: 19.05.2020
1864 from Ternate Island, Indonesia (now Dibamus no-
vaeguineae). Annandale (1904), Humayun Abdulai (fide
Das 1996), Biswas and Sanyal (1977), and Das (1996)
are some of the authors who recorded this species from
Great Nicobar and Biswas and Sanyal (1980) recorded
it from Camorta in the Central group of Nicobar Islands
based on a single adult female specimen. Biswas and
Sanyal (1977) reported on morphological and sexual
variation within this species based on the examination of
three specimens. Based on an examination of the above
material and his own collection from Shompen Hut in
Great Nicobar, Das (1996) resurrected D. nicobaricum
from the synonymy of Dibamus novaeguineae to a dis-
tinct and valid species. Also, he considered the record
from Camorta to be doubtful (Das 1996: 160). Although
this species was discovered about a century and a half
ago there is an apparent lack of knowledge concerning its
biology, population structure and distribution within the
Nicobar archipelago. This deficiency of data also results
in the fact that its current status has not yet been assessed
according to IUCN criteria yet. Hence, the present study
was conducted to determine the status and distribution of
the Nicobar worm-lizard Dibamus nicobaricum.
Corresponding editor: W. Bohme
Published: 04.06.2020
132
S.R. Chandramouli et al.
Table 1. Morphology of two individuals of D. nicobaricum recorded during this study (measurements in mm).
Character
SVL 70
Tail length 1]
Body Width 2.9
Tail width 22
Head length 3.3
Head width 2.8
Head depth 2.8
Eye to nostril 2.5
Number of ventrals 218
Number of subcaudals 38
Midbody scalerows 23
Sex male
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Visual encounter survey method (following Crump and
Scott, 1994) was employed to collect data on the occur-
rence of the target species. Islands were selected in such
a way that at least one of each subgroup of islands was
represented and most of the relatively larger islands (with
geographic area > 50 km?) were included. The forests
were walked by foot and surveys were conducted for one
hour duration, wherein specific types of habitats such as
evergreen forests, semi evergreen forests, riparian for-
ests, coastal moist deciduous forests and plantations and
microhabitats such as leaf-litter, dry stream beds, but-
tresses and soil under rocks and decayed fallen logs were
carefully inspected for the presence of the target species.
One of the specimens recorded here from Teressa Island
was collected, preserved and deposited at ZSI ANRC
(Zoological Survey of India, Andaman and Nicobar Re-
gional Centre), Port Blair. Surveys were conducted both
during the day and night time. Logs were turned, leaf lit-
ter was disturbed, loose soil was dug and tree buttresses
were specifically examined in detail with a flash light to
detect the target species. Behavior of the individuals re-
corded during this study was observed in situ following
Altmann (1974). Photographic documentation was car-
ried out in the natural habitat, but upon capture. Mor-
phological characters namely, the number of scale-rows
at midbody, supralabials, infralabials, number of ven-
trals and subcaudals were examined with a magnifying
lens and the following measurements; snout-vent length
(SVL), tail length, body width, tail width, head length,
head width, head depth, eye-nostril distance were record-
ed using vernier calipers to the nearest 0.1 mm. All of the
survey locations were marked with a GPS and mapped.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 131-140
individual from Great Nicobar
ZSI/ ANRC (T)-7718 (Teressa)
107.6
24.5
7.4
6.6
6.1
5.5
46
3.5
183
19
25
male
The geo-coordinates of the survey locations were record-
ed with a Garmin 12 channel GPS and were pooled with
those based on literature records; thereby a consolidated
set of occurrence points was available to us. This set of
GPS points were used in a predictive distribution model-
ing based on maximum entropy algorithm — MA XENT v.
3.3.3 (Phillips et al. 2006). For making predictions of oc-
currence of the target species, climatic data were down-
loaded for the relevant tile from the Worldclim database
(Hijmans et al. 2005) and appropriately clipped to the
area of interest with DIVA GIS ver. 7.5. Based on these
predictions and the geo-coordinates of its occurrence, the
possible extent of occurrence and the exact area of occu-
pancy of D. nicobaricum was determined (derived from
Geocat: http://geocat.kew.org/). These were then used as
variables in the status assessment as per the IUCN norms
version 3.1 (IUCN 2012).
RESULTS
Three individuals were recorded from new localities
during this study; one from Govind Nagar, another from
Galathea Bay in Great Nicobar and the third one from
Kalasi in Teressa Island. Dibamus nicobaricum 1s record-
ed from Teressa Island in the central Nicobar Islands for
the first time and this also forms the northernmost record
of this species. Likewise, the one recorded from Galathea
forms the southernmost record. One of the specimens
from Govind Nagar (Fig. 1A) recorded during this study
is the smallest one ever recorded, measuring just 81 mm,
with 70 mm SVL. This specimen is described below in
detail.
©ZFMK
Status of Dibamus nicobaricum 133
fine
be eres f 2 J ; PERSE ee ==
Fig. 1. Dibamus nicobaricum recorded during this study in life: A— C: Govind Nagar, D - Galathea, Great Nicobar.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 131-140 ©ZFMK
134
(a) Morphology (Figs 1-2)
Body vermiform; head blunt; neck and eyes indistinct:
nostrils located towards the snout tip, more ventral than
dorsal or lateral in position; rostral large, roughly as broad
as long, occupying '4 of the head length. Frontonasal
much broader than long; relatively smaller than frontal.
Frontal shield pentagonal with the vertex pointing poste-
riorly, slightly wider and fairly longer than the frontona-
sal. Ocular shield horizontally elongate, situated between
the edges of frontal and frontonasal shields; eyes locat-
ed underneath the ocular scales but visible. Postocular
single and fairly large. Two distinct supralabials visible
on either sides; anterior one much elongated and wedge
shaped; posterior relatively shorter and bordering ocular
and postocular shields. Mental shield small, bordered
by one infralabial (the first) on each side. Body scales
smooth, glossy and fairly imbricate. Forelimbs complete-
ly absent; two small skin-flaps situated on either sides of
the vent (immediately above), indicating the rudiments
of hind-limbs. Measurements and pholidosis of the spec-
imens examined are presented in Table 1. Dorsal body
unpatterned; uniform reddish brown in colour. Ventral
region more pinkish and slightly lighter than the dorsal.
S.R. Chandramouli et al.
(b) Distribution (Fig. 3)
Dibamus nicobaricum was recorded from three new lo-
calities during the present study, two of which are from
Great Nicobar, where it is already known and a first re-
cord from Teressa Island. An adult male was recorded
from Kalasi in Teressa Island, under the soil at about
5 cm depth in a coconut plantation (under exploitation)
and a juvenile male was recorded from under a log in
riparian habitat along the banks of a seasonal stream near
Govind Nagar, Great Nicobar (Fig. 4). Both these were
in dense evergreen forests under thick canopy cover. The
third individual was recorded from under a log in a lit-
toral forest in Galathea Bay, Great Nicobar, forming the
southernmost record for this species.
The MAXENT model predicted the distribution of
D. nicobaricum in Great and Little Nicobar islands with
occurrence probabilities ranging from 1 to 0.25 in Great
and Little Nicobar islands and islands of the Central
group, which diminishes to 0.12—0.25 in Car Nicobar,
the northernmost island of the Nicobar archipelago. AUC
(area under the receiver operating characteristic curve)
value was 0.908 with significant contributions by the
following variables: precipitation of the wettest month
Table 2. Percentage contribution of bioclimatic and physiographic variables to the model.
Variable
% contribution
Permutation importance
_biol3_29 a
_biol6 29 a
_biol7_29 a
_bi06 29 a
_bio7_29 a
_bio2 29 a
_biol 29 a
LibiglO+292a.
_biol8 29 a
_biolS5 29 a
_biol4 29 a
_bio9 29 a
_bio& 29 a
bios=29%.a
_bio4 29 a
_bio3 29 a
. DIGI2: 29a
_bioll 29 a
_biolO_ 29 a
_alt_29 a
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 131-140
45.8 0)
42.5
720
47 0
41 1537
WES,
0)
SO. OF Om: OS (OS. F OS * Os OS Oa SO
©ZFMK
Status of Dibamus nicobaricum 35
agement =
Fig. 2. Dibamus nicobaricum. A. Holotype of D. nicobaricum NMW 23461 (courtesy: Gernot Vogel). B. ZSI/ ANRC (T)-7718 col-
lected from Teressa, central Nicobars. C. Ventral view of an individual from Great Nicobar, in life. D. Ventral view of tail, showing
hindlimb rudiments (arrows).
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 131-140 ©ZFMK
136 S.R. Chandramouli et al.
92°30'0"E 93°0'0"E 93°30'0"E 94°0'0"E
Z Z
S >
i=) —)
a x
Zz. Z.
= =
rs a a
S oO
Teressa © ‘
Camorta
Zz. | Zz.
> x. >
> >
i: Katehall ancowry i
Z. z
= _S
7 ”
™ , ™
Little
Nicobar
Z Z
— —
> Great >
tm |
ome mc, Sut ct etl en) ed Som |
ie 18 30 40 Kilometers Nicobar
92°30'0"E 93°0'0"E 93°30'0"E 94°0'0"E
Fig. 3. Distribution records of Dibamus nicobaricum in the Nicobar archipelago. New records from this study marked in red.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 131-140 ©ZFMK
Status of Dibamus nicobaricum 37
Fig. 4. Habitat of Dibamus nicobaricum near Govind Nagar in Great Nicobar.
(45.8%), precipitation of wettest quarter (42.5%), precip-
itation of the driest month (4.7%), minimum temperature
of coldest month (4.1%) and annual temperature range
(2.9%). The other factors pertaining to climate and al-
titude did not have any influence on the prediction (Ta-
ble 2, Figs 5—7).
(c) Behaviour
Behavioural observations were made on the recorded in-
dividuals of Dibamus nicobaricum to observe its pattern
of activity in situ. The period of complete exposure of the
organism was very meager when compared to the dura-
tion spent underground. Whenever the animal ventured
under the soil surface, 1t always reached the bottom of
the container, burrowing through the soil nearly 2-3 cm
deep and resting underground. It voluntarily ventures
out above the soil surface very rarely (during day time).
This elusive behavior, its relatively small body size and
cryptic colouration could chiefly be the reasons behind
the very few records of this species till now. Majority of
the local people were not familiar with Dibamus nico-
baricum and could not recognize it based on the pictures
shown.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 131-140
(d) Status assessment of Dibamus nicobaricum
Based on the projected distribution maps and the number
of individuals observed and reported in literature until
now, it would be appropriate to regard Dibamus nico-
baricum as an ‘Endangered’ species as per the norms of
the IUCN criteria B1 (Extent of occurrence 3865 km”,
which is less than 5000 km?) and B2 (Area of occupancy
estimated to be 36.0 km’, which is less than 500 km”).
However, data on population of D. nicobaricum and its
fluctuation over a period of time are extremely difficult
to establish owing to its rarity, relatively small body size,
fossorial behaviour and elusive nature.
DISCUSSION
Dibamus nicobaricum has been recorded only a few
times since its original description in 1867. The present
study adds to the information on natural history, distri-
bution and behavior of Dibamus nicobaricum. Although
Dibamus nicobaricum was revalidated as a distinct
species by Das (1996), Honda et al. (2001) questioned
the validity of the Nicobarese species based on the fact
©ZFMK
138 S.R. Chandramouli et al.
0.00 - 0.12
0.12 - 0.25
0.25 - 0.38
0.38 - 0.50
0.50 - 1.00
a
kilometers
Fig. 5. Predicted distribution of Dibamus nicobaricum based on
occurrence points. Warmer colours denote higher occurrence
probability.
that Das (1996) failed to study the holotype housed at
the Natural History Museum of Vienna (NMW 23461)
and considered it to be a synonym of Dibamus leucurus
(Bleeker, 1860). In addition, they pointed at certain mor-
phological inconsistencies between the material reported
by Das (1996) as Dibamus nicobaricum and the holotype
that they have examined. Later, Das and Yakoob (2003)
argued based on data from the original description of the
species by Fitzinger (1867) and reinstated the specific
status of Dibamus nicobaricum. Originally described
as a member of the genus Rhinophidion, which is to be
treated as a neuter because of its termination “on” the
specific epithet nicobaricum was appropriate which is
also in neuter because of its termination “wm” and the
binomial was grammatically correct according to the
Art. 31.2 of the ICZN (1999). When Steindachner (1867)
referred this species to the genus Zyphloscincus, he er-
roneously amended the specific epithet to ‘nicobaricus’ .
Stoliczka (1873), who transferred nicobaricus to the ge-
nus Dibamus from Typhloscincus also retained the spe-
cific epithet with the masculine termination “us”. How-
ever, Das (1996) reinstated the correct specific epithet
by mentioning this species in the combination Dibamus
nicobaricum with a masculine generic epithet and a neu-
tral specific epithet, as per the original description. Lat-
er, Das (1999) changed it back to the name combination
Dibamus nicobaricus (sic.) with a masculine generic as
well as specific epithet. Likewise, the taxon authorship of
D. nicobaricum has sometimes been attributed to Stein-
dachner (1867) (e.g., Uetz et al. 2020). However, the cor-
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 131-140
rect representation should be Fitzinger in Steindachner,
1867, because Steindachner (1867: 53) himself credited
the description of Rhinophidion nicobaricum to Fitzinger
by mentioning it as “Fitzinger in lit”.
Though Das (1996) included the Camorta locality in
the distribution of the species, he was skeptical about its
validity and expressed doubt on its authenticity assum-
ing that the locality could be in error and emphasized
the need for its verification. During the present study,
Dibamus nicobaricum has been recorded from Teressa
Island, located further northwest (~ 40 km) of Camor-
ta, which endorses the earlier record from Camorta by
Biswas and Sanyal (1980), thereby extending the north-
ern boundary of its distribution range significantly. Like-
wise, the new record from Galathea Bay in the southern
extremity of Great Nicobar Island extends its known
distribution range further southwards by at least 30 km.
Its confirmed presence in Camorta, Katchall and Teressa
Islands in the central group of the Nicobar archipelago
make its occurrence on other islands of this group such as
Nancowry, Tillanchong and Bompaka highly probable.
Also, there is a high probability of its occurrence in the
intervening Little Nicobar Island. Records of D. nicobar-
icum have been relatively rare since its description and
information on abundance of the species is hard to obtain
due to its elusive and fossorial lifestyle. Hence, this spe-
cies has been considered data deficient by the IUCN until
now. Based on the projected distribution maps and the
number of individuals observed and reported 1n literature
and the present study, it would be appropriate to regard
Dibamus nicobaricum as an ‘Endangered’ species as per
the norms of the IUCN criteria B1 (Extent of occurrence
less than 5000 km?) and B2 (Area of occupancy less than
500 km?). Several aspects of this species, such as breed-
ing biology, feeding ecology and population estimates
still remain unknown. Further studies on such specific
aspects would provide us more insights about the endan-
gered and narrowly endemic Dibamus nicobaricum.
Acknowledgements. SRC thanks the Department of Environ-
ment and Forests of Andaman and Nicobar Islands for permis-
sion, K.V. Devi Prasad and the faculty of the Department of
Ecology and Environmental Sciences and the Department of
Ocean Studies and Marine Biology, Pondicherry University
for the support and hospitality. This paper is an outcome of a
grant (No: 160514249) from the Mohamed bin Zayed Species
conservation Fund. Gernot Vogel kindly provided data and pho-
tographs of the holotype of Dibamus nicobaricum housed at
the NMW, Vienna. We thank the Director of Zoological Survey
of India, for his encouragement and support to undertake the
survey in Andaman and Nicobar Islands. SRC is grateful to R.
Whitaker for recommending this study.
REFERENCES
Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling
methods. Behaviour 49 (3): 227-267
©ZFMK
Status of Dibamus nicobaricum 139
_alt_29_a
_bio10_29_ar
_bio11_29_a
_bio12_29_a
_bio013_29_a
_bio14_29_a
_bio15_29_a
_bio16_29_a
_bio17_29_a
_bio18_29_a
_bio19_29_a
_bio1_29_a
_bio2_29_a
_bio3_29_a
_bio4_29_a
_bio5_29_a
_bio06_29_a
_bio7_29_a
_bio8_29_a
_bio9_29_a
Environmental Variable
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6
Jackknife of regularized training gain for Dibamus_nicobaricum
Without variable ™
With only variable ®
With all variables ™
0.8 1.0 12 1.4
regularized training gain
Fig. 6. Jackknife test of variable importance to the model.
Sensitivity vs. 1 - Specificity for Dibamus_nicobaricum
|
©
a
S
fa)
So
‘i
Sensitivity (1 - Omission Rate)
o
wo
0.0 01 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
1 - Specificity (Fractional Predicted Area)
Training data (AUC = 0.908) ®
Random Prediction (AUC = 0.5) ®
Fig. 7. Receiver operating characteristic curve for the MAX-
ENT model predicting the distribution of Dibamus nicobari-
cum.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 131-140
Annandale N (1904) Contributions to Oriental herpetology III -
Notes on Oriental lizards in the Indian Museum with a list of
the species recorded from British India and Ceylon. Journal
of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 1: 139-151
Biswas S, Sanyal DP (1977) Notes on the reptilian collection
from the Great Nicobar Island during the Great Nicobar ex-
pedition in 1966. Records of Zoological Survey of India 72:
107-124
Biswas S, Sanyal DP (1980) A report on the reptilian fauna of
Andaman and Nicobars Islands in the collection of Zoolog-
ical Survey of India. Records of Zoological Survey of India
77. 255-292
Crump ML, Scott NJ (1994) Visual Encounter Survey. Pp.
84—96 in: WR Heyer, MA Donnelly, RW McDiarmid, LC
Hayek & MS Foster (eds) Measuring and Monitoring Bio-
logical Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians. Smith-
sonian Institution Press, Washington
Das I (1996) The validity of Dibamus nicobaricum (Fitzinger
in Steindachner, 1867) (Squamata: Sauria: Dibamidae). Rus-
sian Journal of Herpetology 3: 157-162
Das I (1999) Biogeography of the amphibians and reptiles of
the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. Pp. 43—77 in: Ota,
H. (ed.) Tropical Island herpetofauna. Origin, current diver-
sity and current status. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Das I, N Yakoob (2003) A new species of Dibamus (Squamta:
Dibamidae) from peninsular Malaysia. Raffles Bulletin of
Zoology 51: 143-147
©ZFMK
140 S.R. Chandramouli et al.
Hiymans RJ, SE Cameron, JL Parra, PG Jones, A. Jarvis (2005)
Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global
land areas. International Journal of Climatology 25: 1965—
1978
ICZN [International Commission on Zoological Nomencla-
ture] (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature.
Fourth Edition. International Trust of Zoological Nomencla-
ture, London
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List categories and criteria: version
3.1. Second Edition. Switzerland / Cambridge, UK
Phillips SJ, RP Anderson, RE Schapire (2006) Maximum entro-
py modelling of species geographic distributions. Ecological
Modelling 190: 231-259
Pyron RA, Burbink FT, JJ Wiens (2013) A phylogeny and re-
vised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 131-140
of lizards and snakes. BMC Evolutionary Biology 13: 93.
https://doi.org/ 10.1186/1471-2148-13-93
Steindachner F (1867) Reptilien. Pp. 1-98 in: Reise der Oes-
terreichischen Fregatte Novara um die Erde in den Jahren
1857, 1858, 1859, unter den Befehlen des Commodore B.
von Willerstorf-Urbair. Zoologischer Theil, 1. Band: Wirbel-
thiere, Karl Gerold’s Sohn, Wien 1869. Kaiserlich-Konigli-
che Hof- und Staatsdruckerei, Wien. https://doi.org/10.5962/
bhl.title. 1597
Stoliczka F (1873) Note on some Andamanese and Nicobarese
reptiles, with the description of three new species of lizards.
Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 92: 162-169
Uetz P, Freed P, HoSek J (eds) (2019) The Reptile Database.
Online at http://www.reptile-database.org [last accessed
10 May 2020]
©ZFMK
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 141-155
2020 - Steenis, J. van et al.
https://do1.org/10.20363/BZB-2020.69.1.141
ISSN 2190-7307
http://www.zoologicalbulletin.de
Research article
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:787328A 5-4082-4677-858C-867962B56395
First records of Chrysotoxum volaticum Séguy, 1961 from Europe
and Platycheirus marokkanus Kassebeer, 1998 from Spain
(Diptera: Syrphidae) together with additional records
of Spanish Chrysotoxum Meigen, 1803
Jeroen van Steenis'*, Menno P. van Zuijen2, Antonio Ricarte’, M. Angeles Marcos-Garcia‘, Dieter Doczkal,
Axel Ssymank® & Ximo Mengual’
‘Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden. Hof der Toekomst 48, NL-3823 HX Amersfoort, The Netherlands
? Kolkakkerweg 21-2, NL-6708 RK Wageningen, The Netherlands
4 Centro Iberoamericano de la Biodiversidad (CIBIO), University of Alicante, San Vicente del Raspeig 03690, Alicante, Spain
*Klingelackerweg 10, 76571 Gaggenau, Germany
° Falkenweg 6, 53343 Wachtberg, Germany
’Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz-Institut fiir Biodiversitat der Tiere, Adenauerallee 160,
D-53113 Bonn, Germany
* Corresponding author: Email: jvansteenis@syrphidaeintrees.com
'urn:Isid:zoobank.org:author:C7FOD0O1C-B182-4B93-AF73-E4 154367B535
2urn:Isid:zoobank.org:author:C82093D8-EE58-47DD-B13A-4F47BDF73911
3urn:Isid:zoobank.org:author:3 C2 FCE66-9DDF-4E8A-BDO0D-96BB01C238D8
4urn:Isid:zoobank.org:author: EBDD4FE8-EBA6-4E40-A EC3-9B4EED6E7C98
Surn:|sid:zoobank.org:author:79800F7A-AA21-4948-A D64-619BDSFCBB98
6urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:58B9D453-586C-4B08-BAD6-BCC606E3D654
7urn:Isid:zoobank.org:author:A5093 10D-B567-4830-B8A4-BCB139BB8768
Abstract. The first European records of Chrysotoxum volaticum Séguy, 1961 from Spain and France, and Platycheirus
marokkanus Kassebeer, 1998 from Spain are provided. These are further examples of North African species also present
in the Iberian Peninsula. Diagnostic characters are given to separate C. volaticum and the similar Chrysotoxum bicinctum
(Linnaeus, 1758), and additional records of other Chrysotoxum Meigen, 1803 hoverflies from Spain are also reported. We
also provide DNA barcodes for C. volaticum and discuss the utility of DNA barcoding to identify species in the genus
Chrysotoxum.
Key words. Ibero-Maghreb fauna, new species records, France, Spain, diagnosis, DNA barcoding.
INTRODUCTION
Syrphidae is a species rich family of Diptera which has
received much attention during the last decades. Adults
of this family are often wasp and bee mimic flower vis-
itors, while larvae have very different feeding modes
(Rotheray & Gilbert 1999, 2011). Adults of many spe-
cies are important pollinators (Ssymank & Kearns 2009;
Inouye et al. 2015), predatory larvae are important for
pest control (Bugg et al. 2008, Pineda & Marcos-Garcia,
2008; Amoros-Jiménez et al. 2012) and saprophagous
larvae in the decomposition of organic material (Lardé
1989; Rotheray et al. 2009; Martinez-Falcon et al. 2012).
The large amount of knowledge we now have about this
family in Europe and the interest syrphids provoke in
many academic and applied fields has led the internation-
al organisation IUCN to develop a European red list for
Received: 05.04.2020
Accepted: 22.05.2020
Syrphidae (IUCN 2018). The data here reported will help
the preparation of a red list from Spain.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Morphological terminology follows Thompson (1999).
The examined material originates from different col-
lecting events in Spain and France in the last decades.
The species were identified using original descriptions
(Séguy 1961; Kassebeer 1998) and other literature (Niel-
sen 1999; de Courcy Williams et al. 2011; Nedeljkovic
et al. 2013; Speight et al. 2013; Young et al. 2016). Many
Spanish specimens were collected in the ‘Sierra de Al-
caraz’, in the province of Albacete, a low mountainous
area with open Pine forests with Mediterranean maquis
(Van Steenis et al. 2017). The information provided under
Corresponding editor: R. Peters
Published: 04.06.2020
142 Jeroen van Steenis et al.
‘Examined material’ is given in the order of region or
province, area and locality with an indication of the alti-
tude, collecting date, in which a range is indicated with
“_» the collector, without adding “leg.” in the material
studied section, and in some cases a specimen identifying
number, rather than the precise label information.
The figures were made by the first author by stacking
multiple photos in Zerene Stacker ver. 1.04 and then fur-
ther edited with GNU Image Manipulation Program ver.
2.8.22. Each individual photo was taken with Cognisys
StackShot at fixed intervals with a Canon EOS D6 SLR
camera, a Canon MP-E 5x macro-zoom with a Yongn-
uo YN14EX ring flash attached. The colour plates were
made with the aid of a Zeiss camera lucida on a Zeiss-ste-
reomicroscope SV11 by Axel Ssymank.
Abbreviations for depositories / collections
AET = private collection of André van Eck, Tilburg,
the Netherlands
ASW_ = private collection of Axel Ssymank
CEUA = Coleccion Entomologica de la Universidad
de Alicante, CIBIO Institute, Alicante, Spain
CPP. = private collection of Chris Palmer,
Portsmouth, United Kingdom
DDG _~ = private collection of Dieter Doczkal,
Gaggenau, Germany
JSA = private collection of Jeroen van Steenis
MNCN = Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales,
Madrid, Spain
MNHN = Muséum National d’ Histoire Naturelle,
Paris, France
MRL = private collection of Menno Reemer, Leiden,
the Netherlands
MZW_ = private collection of Menno van Zuijen
NBC = Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden,
the Netherlands
NHM-~ = The Natural History Museum, London,
UK
SBH = private collection of Sander Bot, Haren,
the Netherlands
The 5’ region of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COT)
gene, the so called DNA barcode (Hebert et al. 2003a,
2003b) was obtained from three specimens of Chrysotox-
um volaticum Séguy, 1961. Meso- and metalegs from dry,
pinned specimens were used for DNA extraction. The
extraction protocol follows Mengual et al. (2018) and the
specimens were preserved and labelled as DNA voucher
specimens for the purpose of morphological studies and
deposited at the CEUA. DNA primers and PCR amplifi-
cation protocols follow Rozo-Lopez & Mengual (2015).
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 141-155
RESULTS
Both Chrysotoxum volaticum and Platycheirus marok-
kanus have been mentioned to occur in Europe (Ssy-
mank & Doczkal 2007; Van Steenis & Van Steenis 2014),
but only records of P. marokkanus have been documented
so far (Van Eck 2016).
Since Séguy’s original description, Chrysotoxum vola-
ticum has been reported only from Morocco by Claussen
(1989) and Claussen & Hauser (1990). The original de-
scription of C. volaticum is not very informative and this
species is missing from most identification keys. Thus,
we provide here a table (Table 1) of diagnostic characters
and a key to distinguish it from the similar Chrysotoxum
bicinctum (Linnaeus, 1758).
Chrysotoxum bicinctum (Linnaeus, 1758)
Distribution. Widespread throughout Europe, possibly
very rare in the Iberian Peninsula. In Spain, records of
this species are confirmed just from the provinces of As-
turias, Cantabria and Lérida.
Material examined. Many records in the authors’ col-
lections throughout Europe. Spain: 14 (CEUA), Astur-
ias, Santillan, 6-VII-1986, M.A. Marcos Garcia (26b),
[det. as C. bicinctum form A by A. Ssymank in 2009];
12 (CPP), Cantabria, Potes, Las Ilces, 43°06’41” N,
4°45°27” W, 754 m, 26-VI-2017, C.J. Palmer; 19
(CPP), Girona, Setcases, 26-VIII-1996, C.J. Palmer:
1° “yellow” (SBH), Lleida, Bordes de Graus, camping,
42°40°07” N 1°14°14” E, 1321 m, 4-VII-2019, S. Bot; 19
(SBH), Lleida, near Tavascan, 42°40’59” N, 1°13’59” W,
1400 m, 29-VII-2013, S. Bot; 14 (NBC), Lleida, Vall
d’Aran, VIII-[19]45; 14 (CEUA), Santander, Vada, 22-
VI-1987, M.A. Marcos Garcia (34).
The two CEUA males were already published as C. bi-
cinctum in Marcos-Garcia (1990) and are here confirmed
to belong to this species.
Remarks. This species is similar to Chrysotoxum volat-
icum and was, until recently, confused with this species
in Europe (Ssymank & Doczkal 2007). Note that there
is a form of C. bicinctum resembling C. volaticum in the
more extensively dark coloured wing (Fig. 3F). These
specimens are common in the UK and Scandinavia and
are generally darker (Figs 2C, 2D), with dark legs, dark
abdomen and dark-brown to entirely black (as in Figs 4A,
4C) mouth edge and hypostomal bridge. In the Pyrenees,
intermediate forms are also found with a combination of
characters in-between C. bicinctum and C. volaticum in-
dicating possible hybridization.
There is one female (Spain, Pyrenees, coll. SBH) with
black mouth edge and hypostomal bridge as in C. vola-
ticum and a short wing macula, a black frons with small
©ZFMK
First records of Chrysotoxum volaticum from Europe and Platycheirus marokkanus from Spain
pollinose maculae and narrow fascia on tergum IV as
in C. bicinctum. Two other females (coll. SBH, Spain
Lérida and France, Pyrenees) have a yellow hypostomal
bridge, a black frons and a short wing macula as in C. bi-
cinctum, but large pollinose maculae on the frons and
a wide yellow fascia on tergum IV as in C. volaticum.
These all could be females of C. bicinctum in which the
last two are “yellow” forms in which the pollinose macu-
lae on the frons are larger. There are three males (France,
Pyrenees, coll. SBH), sympatric with one of the “yellow”
females, which seem to be more straightforward iden-
tified as Chrysotoxum volaticum, although the frontal
pollinosity, the frontal colour and the colouration of the
scutellum seem to be more like in C. bicinctum.
143
Chrysotoxum volaticum Séguy, 1961
Distribution. Originally described from Algeria and
Morocco (Séguy, 1961). Recently recorded from Moroc-
co (Claussen, 1989; Claussen & Hauser, 1990). Dirickx
(1994) also reported this species in the Mediterranean
region of Morocco.
New to Europe and found in France, Portugal and
Spain.
Material examined. Type series: 2 3, 3 9, “Moyen At-
las, Ifrane (Morocco), VI-[1]949”, “Museum Paris 1949
L. Chopard”; 1 3 “Setif, Algérie, coll. Théry”, “Museum
Paris, Algérie, Setif A. Théry 1902” (MNHN). France:
2 2 (MRL), Cevennes, Causse Blandas, 10 km SW Le
Vigan, 43°54’56” N, 3°28°51” E, 800 m, 20-VHI-2014,
M. Reemer; 1 2 (JSA), Languedoc-Roussillon, Prades,
Table 1. Differentiating characters between Chrysotoxum volaticum and C. bicinctum.
Colouration of wing
Chrysotoxum bicinctum
Dark macula on wing margin shorter
Chrysotoxum volaticum
Dark brown to black on anterior margin, reaching
Scutellum in dorsal view
Frons, colour around
the lunulae on frontal
prominence
Pollinosity on frons
Ratio: length of eye
contiguity/ ocellar triangle
(males only)
Tergum III
Tergum IV
Genae and hypostomal bridge
never reaching wing apex and usually
ending as a broad blunt spot above
the bow of vein R4+5, usually apical
border of dark wing macula clearly
demarcated. In dark specimens radial
cell R1 also darkened and outer apical
border diffuse
Almost completely black, with a
narrow yellow posterior margin.
In bright specimen two narrow yellow
or obscured small maculae may be
present basally, in males sometimes
fused to a narrow basal yellow line
Complete frons dark brown to black;
lunulae itself mostly dark brown to
black, rarely obscurely yellow or in
some specimen yellow
Males: narrow pollinose fascia white
Females: pollinose maculae smaller,
leaving about '/s—'/ of the frons free in
the middle
Eye contiguity often distinctly longer
than ocellar triangle, Ratio ca. 1.1—1.3
Black usually with very narrow yellow
fascia or well developed yellow pair of
maculae, however dark specimen have a
completely dark terum III
Yellow fascia narrow, usually
0.2—0.4 of length of tergum IV, in light
specimens wider
Genae below eyes with a black vitta,
but hypostomal bridge clearly yellow,
in dark specimens genae black and
the wing apex, Radial cell R1 completely darkened
and dark patch extending distinctly beyond the tip
of this cell, dark spot in cell R2+3 reaching costa
for up to about % of its length within this cell,
wing patch apically and on posterior margin clearly
demarcated, sometimes reaching backwards to join
R4+5 apically
Scutellum largely yellow with scarcely visible
narrow black fascia basally and a black median fascia
of varying extent:
Females usually with broad median black fascia of ca.
0.50.7 x of length of scutellum
Frons laterally and posteriorly of lunulae yellow.
However, the yellow part may be largely obscured
with only laterally some dark-yellow colour
Males: narrow pollinose fascia yellowish
Females: pollinose maculae large, almost touching,
narrow non-pollinose line in between usually less than
'/s of width of frons
Almost the same length,
Ratio 0.9-1.1
Black with a very narrow yellow posterior margin,
rarely also with small yellow maculae
Yellow fascia broad, usually 0.4—0.75 of length of
tergum IV,
Genae below eyes and hypostomal bridge usually
completely black or with dark brownish patches
on the sides; a few individuals may have an almost
hypostomal bridge dark-brown to black
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 141-155
yellow mouth edge
©ZFMK
144 Jeroen van Steenis et al.
Fig. 1. Adult habitus. A. Lateral view. B—D. Dorsal view. A. Chrysotoxum bicinctum, 2°, Sweden. B. C. bicinctum, 3, Sweden.
C. C. festivum, 4, Spain. D. C. volaticum, 3, Sierra de Alcaraz. Scale bars: 2.5 mm.
Les Sauterelles, 42°34’15” N 2°24’49” E, 785 m, 12-
VIUI-2014, J. van Steenis; 19 (JSA), Vernet les Bains,
Col de Mantet, 42°28’50” N 2°18°53” E, 1765 m, 17-
VIII-2014, J. van Steenis; 3 3 (SBH), Pyrenees, Vallée
d’Eyne, 42°28’05” N, 2°05’17” E, 1650 m, 23-VIH-2013,
S. Bot; 1 6 (NBC), Pyrenees Orientales, Font Rocheu,
11-VII-1965, J. v.d Vecht; 1 9 (NBC), Pyrenees Oriental-
es, Fillols, 10-VII-1965, J. v.d. Vecht; 1 2 (NBC), Vau-
cluse, Carpentras VI-1953, P.M.F. Verhoeff; 12 9 (NBC),
Vaucluse, Carpentras, 1—3-VIII-1953, P.M.F. Verhoeff:
Morocco: 2 2 (NBC), Toubkal Massif, Oukaimeden,
2500-2800 m, 2—8-VII-1977, v. Oorschot, Houkes &
Oosterbroek; 1 2 (NBC), Arhbalou, 43 km S. Marra-
kech, route $513, 1000 m, 3—14-VII-1977, v. Oorschot,
Houkes & Oosterbroek; Portugal: | 2 (NBC), Doure,
Resende, 16—19-VII-1953, P.M.F. Verhoeff; 1 9 (AET),
Braga, Gilmonde, Barcelos, 41°29’02” N 8°46’00” W,
22-V-2012, R. Andrade; Spain: 1 3 (JSA), Albacete,
Sierra de Alcaraz, Batan del Puerto, 38°34’ N 2°21’ W,
1200 m, 21-VI-2003, J. van Steenis; 2 6, 1 9 (JSA),
3 2 (MZW), Sierra de Alcaraz, Puerto de las Crucetillas,
38°31’ N 2°26’ W, 1400 m, 21-VI-2003, J. van Steenis &
M.-P. van Zuijen; 1 6, 1 2 (MZW), Sierra de Alcaraz,
Puerto de las Crucetillas, 38°32’ N, 2°24’ W, 1100 m, 21-
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 141-155
VI-2003, M.P. van Zuijen; 1 4, 1 2 (JSA), 12 (MZW),
Sierra de Alcaraz, Puerto de las Crucetillas, 38°32’ N,
2°23’ W, 1000-1200 m, 22-VI-2003, J. van Steenis &
M.P. van Zuiyen; 1 2 (JSA), Sierra de Alcaraz, Cafiada
del Provencio, 38°31’ N 2°20’ W, 1000 m, 22-VI-2003, J.
van Steenis; 1 4 (NBC), Andalucia, Prado Llano, 23-VII-
1980; 1 9 (NBC), Andalucia, Prado Llano, 24-VII-1980;
12 (NBC), Vadillo Castril, Sierra de Cazorla, 3-VIII-
1980; 5 4 (MRL), Andalucia, Sierra Nevada, 2 km N of
Trevelez, 25-VI-2003, M. Reemer; 1 4 (MRL), Andalu-
cia, Sierra Nevada, Trevélez, 37°00’47” N, 3°15°47” W,
1600 m, 10-VI-2019, M. Reemer; 1 9 (CEUA), Avila,
Becedas, 6-VII-1977, M.A. Marcos-Garcia; 2 5 (ASW),
3 3, 1 2 (DDG), Castilla la Mancha, Sierra de Alcaraz,
Ridpar, 38°30°17” N, 2°27°36” W, ca. 775 m, 14-VI-
2003, A. Ssymank & D. Doczkal; 4 3, 1 2 (ASW),
53, 12 (DDG), Sierra de Alcaraz, Espinares de Leon,
38°32715” N, 2924718” W, ca. 1380 m, 14-VI-2003, A.
Ssymank & D. Doczkal; 3 9 (CEUA), Ciudad Real,
PN. Cabafieros, respectively 20-V-2005, 5-VII-2005,
24-VIII-2005, A. Ricarte; 3 4 (NBC), Gerona, Ribas de
Freser, 900 m, 25-VII-1970, V.S. v.d. Goot; 1 4 (NBC),
Gerona, Ribas de Freser, 900 m, 26-VII-1970, V.S. v.d.
Goot; 2 4 (NBC), Gerona, Mollo, 1300 m, 17-VII-1970,
©ZFMK
First records of Chrysotoxum volaticum from Europe and Platycheirus marokkanus from Spain 145
Fig. 2. Adult habitus, dorsal view, all from Sierra de Alcaraz. A. Chrysotoxum cisalpinum, °. B. C. gracile, 2°. C. C. octomacula-
tum, 2. D. C. octomaculatum, 2, dark form. Scale bars: 2.5 mm.
VS. v.d. Goot; 2 6 (NBC), Gerona, Ribas, Zariquiey; 1 9
(NBC), La Rioja, dal v Najerilla, S. of Najera, ca 10 km
S. of Anguiano, 22-VH-—10-VII-1988, PJ. v. Helsdin-
gen; 2 9 (NBC), Gerona, Ribas de Freser, 900 m, 21-
VI-1970, V.S. v.d. Goot; 1 9 (NBC), Gerona, Ribas de
Freser, 900 m, 25-VI-1970, V.S. v.d. Goot; 1 9 (NBC),
Gerona, Mollo, 1300 m, 19-VH-1970, VS. v.d. Goot; 1 2
(NBC), Gerona, Sant Ilari de Sacala, VIII-1969, Serra:
1 3 (NBC), Granada, Capileira, 22-VII-1969, H. Over-
beek; 1 9 (NBC), Montseny, St Pere de Vilamajor, Sagar-
ra; 2 2 (NBC), Guadalajara, Tierzo bei Mo[illegible]na,
1100 m, 11-VII-1977, W. Schacht; 1 3 (NBC), Guada-
lajara, Tierzo bei M[illegible], 1100 m, 11-VII-1977, W.
Schacht; 2 4 (NBC), Huesca, Torla, 1036 m, 8—26-VII-
1974, J. Wolschrijn; 1 9 (MNCN), Huesca, San Juan de
la Pefia, 1220 m, Exp. Inst. de Entomologia, 4-VIII-1943,
Chrysotoxum bicinctum (L, 1758) Peris Torres det. 1945;
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 141-155
1 3 (MNCN) Jaén, Sierras de Segura, El Pardal, VI-
1903, Escalera; 1 4 (CEUA), Leon, Valdetejas, 1200 m,
13-VII-1977, M.A. Marcos-Garcia; 1 2 (NBC), Lerida,
Alamacellas, Zariquiey; 14 (MNCN), Madrid, Escorial,
Coleccion Lauffer, Chrysotoxum bicinctum L, det Strobl;
Escorial, VHI-1905, Mercet, Chrysotoxum bicinctum L,
Gil Collado det; 1 9 (CEUA), Salamanca, Béyar, 5-VII-
1978, Carmen Calvo; 3 3 (CEUA), Fresnedoso, 3-VII-
1978, Gonzalo Llorente; 1<' (CEUA), Palomares-Béjar,
10-VII-1978, Gonzalo Llorente; 1 4 (CEUA), Porteros,
14-VI-1981, M. Portillo, Th. villosa; 1 4 (CEUA), Valle-
josa de Riofrio, 15-VI-1979, Gonzalo Llorente; 1 9
(NBC), Nuria, 1800-2000 m, 22-VII-1970, VS. v.d.
Goot; 1 29 (MNCN), Segovia, San Ildefonso, VI-1906,
Escalera; | 9 (CEUA), Valencia, Chelva, 7—21-VI-1994,
C. Pérez-Bafion; 1 9 (CEUA), Requena, 22-VI-1994, C.
Pérez-Bafion; 1 4, Utiel, 7-VI-1994, C. Pérez-Bafion;
©ZFMK
146 Jeroen van Steenis et al.
Fig. 3. Habitus and wing. A. Chrysotoxum volaticum 3. B. C. volaticum 2 with wing. C. Wing of C. volaticum 3. D. C. bicinctum,
typical form & with wing. E. Wing of C. bicinctum, typical form 3. F. Wing of C. bicinctum form’ A’ from Brandenburg, Germany.
All drawings ©A. Ssymank.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 141-155 ©ZFMK
First records of Chrysotoxum volaticum from Europe and Platycheirus marokkanus from Spain 147
Fig. 4. Details of head and scutellum. A. Chrysotoxum volaticum @, head in lateral view. B. C. volaticum 4, head ventral view.
C. C. volaticum ° head ventral view. D. C. bicinctum, typical form @, head in lateral view. E. C. bicinctum 3 head ventral view.
F. C. bicinctum 8 head ventral view. G-H. C. bicinctum, typical form & scutellum, dorsal and lateral view. I. C. bicinctum form
"AN J scutellum, dorsal view. J, L, N. C. volaticum & scutellum in dorsal and lateral view, normal colouration. K, M. C. volaticum
& scutellum in dorsal and lateral view, bright colouration. All drawings ©A. Ssymank.
1 ¢ (NBC), Sierra Alta, 1600-1800 m, 26-VII-1965,
VS. v.d. Goot; 1 9 (CEUA), Santander, Vada, 22-VI-
1987, M.A. Marcos Garcia (34); 1 3 (NBC), Tarrago-
na, Prades, 900 m, 1—10-VII-1967, H. & T. v. Oorschot,
J. & M. Lourens; 1 3 (NBC), Teruel, Sra de Albarracin,
Noguera, 1600 m, 12-VII-1977, W. Schacht; 1 4 (NBC),
Teruel, Sierra de Albarracin, Noguera, 1600 m, 3—6-VIII-
1980, W. Schacht; 1 9 (NBC), Teruel, Bronemales; 1 9
(NBC), Teruel, Aguas Amarguas, 1620 m, 21-VII-1965,
VS. v.d. Goot; 3 2 (NBC), 24-VII-1965; 2 2 (NBC), 29-
VI-1965; 1 9 (NBC), Teruel, Sierra Alta, 1600-1800 m,
26-VII-1965, V.S. v.d. Goot; 3 2 (NBC), Teruel, Pajar-
es, 1000 m, 20-VII-1972, VS. v.d. Goot; 1 2 (NBC),
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 141-155
Teruel, Puerto de Pajares, 1350-1700 m, 21-VII-1972,
VS. v.d. Goot; 3 2 (NBC), 22-VII-1972; 1 2 (NBC),
Teruel, Santa Croche, 1150 m, 5-VIII-1965, V.S. v.d.
Goot; 1 9 (NBC), Teruel, Santa Croche, 1150 m, 5-VIII-
1965, V.S. v.d. Goot; 1 2 (NBC), Teruel, Sierra de Al-
barracin, Nogueta, 1600 m, 3—6-VIII-1980, W. Schacht;
2 9 (CEUA), Jaén, PN. Cazorla, Coto Rios, Llanos
de Arance, 38°03’12.1” N, 02°50°10.6” E, 641 m, 13-
VI-2019, A. Ricarte (ZFMK-DIP-00067297, ZFMK-
DIP-00067298); 1 3 (CEUA), Jaén, Coto Rios, meadow
in riverbank opposite Fuente de la Pascuala camping site,
38°03’ 13” N, 2°50’09” E, 641 m, 29-V-2018, E. Galante
(ZFMK-DIP-00067299).
©ZFMK
148 Jeroen van Steenis et al.
Fig. 5. Head; A. Dorsal view. B—D. Lateral view. A. Chrysotoxum cisalpinum, 3, Sierra de Alcaraz. B. C. festivum, 2, Spain.
C. C. volaticum, 2, Sierra de Alcaraz. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.
Remarks. This species is similar to Chrysotoxum bicinc-
tum, differing by the characters mentioned in Table 1.
See also Figs 3A—C, 4A—-C, 4J—M.
Many Spanish specimens were collected while visiting
flowers of Thapsia villosa L.
The Spanish examined material represents the first re-
cord from Spain, including specimens previously identi-
fied as C. bicinctum from the provinces of Jaén, Madrid,
Segovia (Gil Collado, 1930), Avila, Caceres, Salamanca
(Marcos-Garcia 1986), Valencia (Pérez-Bafion, 1995),
Ciudad Real (Ricarte 2008) and Huesca (MNCN spec-
imen identified as C. bicinctum by Peris Torres), all of
them now confirmed to belong to the species C. volati-
cum. All other records of C. bicinctum in Ricarte & Mar-
cos-Garcia (2017), which were not accessible to the au-
thors of the present paper, must be regarded as doubtful
until they are re-examined.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 141-155
Genetics. Three specimens were successfully sequenced
and the 5'-COI sequences were submitted to GenBank
(accession numbers MT517826, MT517825, MT517824
for specimens ZFMK-DIP-00067297, ...00067298, and
...00067299 respectively). The obtained three DNA bar-
codes are identical. We compared our molecular data
with two other DNA barcodes from specimens identified
as C. volaticum from Morocco (Jeff H. Skevington, un-
pub. data), and the two Moroccan specimens have an un-
corrected pairwise-distance of 0.017—0.0185 (similarity
of 98.3% and 98.15% respectively) with our specimens,
and the uncorrected pairwise-distance between them is
0.00155 (99.845% similarity). The Barcode Index Num-
ber (BIN) (Ratnasingham & Hebert 2013) helps to assign
individuals to presumptive species, called operational
taxonomic units (OTUs) and they are good estimators
of valid species, but there are cases of discordance be-
tween BINs and accepted species boundaries. For C. vol-
©ZFMK
First records of Chrysotoxum volaticum from Europe and Platycheirus marokkanus from Spain 149
Fig. 6. Platycheirus marokkanus, &, from Sierra de Alcaraz. A. Adult habitus, dorsal view. B. Head, dorsal view. C. Protibia and
tarsus dorsal view. D. Profemur, dorsal view. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.
aticum there is the BIN BOLD:AAJ0967 (https://doi.
org/10.5883/BOLD:AAJ0967), but individuals assigned
to this BIN were identified to belong to 12 different mor-
phological species, e.g., Chrysotoxum arcuatum (Linnae-
us, 1758), C. bicinctum, C. biguttatum Matsumura, 1911,
C. elegans Loew, 1841, C. festivum (Linnaeus, 1758),
C. graciosum Violovitsh, 1975, C. montanum Nedel-
jkovic & Vujic, 2015, C. octomaculatum Curtis, 1837,
C. sapporense Matsumura, 1916, C. vernale Loew, 1841,
C. verralli Collin, 1940, and C. volaticum. This means
that the algorithm that automatically assigns individ-
uals to OTUs based on sequence variation in the COI
DNA barcode region is not able to find enough differ-
ences among the COI sequences of these species; in oth-
er words, the intraspecific variation of this gene region
overlaps with the interspecific variation among these 12
species.
The nearest-neighbour in BOLD systems (http://www.
boldsystems.org) is C. orthostylum Nedeljkovi¢ & Vu-
jic, 2015 (with BIN BOLD:ADJ6446), but the p-distance
within BOLD:AAJ0967 overlaps with the distance be-
tween the two BINs: in other words, there is no barcod-
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 141-155
ing gap between the members of BOLD:AAJ0967 and
C. orthostylum.
Modification to existing keys
In the current identification keys (e.g., Speight et al.
2016; Bot & Van de Meutter, 2019) the following text
should be added to separate Chrysotoxum bicinctum from
C. volaticum:
5. Yellow fascia on tergum III as deep as those on
CE OUM ro 2 BAe) sa nape ene Es Ol ee 2 6
— Yellow fascia on tergum III strongly reduced, absent
to at most half the width of the fascia on tergum IV
SA. Wing with large dark macula; radial cell R,
completely darkened (usually blackish) and dark
macula extending distinctly beyond the apex of
this cell, almost reaching the apex of the wing and
reaching costal border on about % of its length
within cell R,,,, dark wing macula usually apically
clearly demarcated; scutellum almost completely
yellow or with a dark-brown to black median fascia,
©ZFMK
150 Jeroen van Steenis et al.
at least basally in dorsal view broadly yellow; frontal
prominence immediately above insertion of antennae
yellow to brown-yellow, in some specimens blackish;
genae below eyes and hypostomal bridge usually
completely black or with dark brownish maculae on
the sides; rarely: partly VOuMOwW: o5.ii5 0s Secsgstennnseyeonee
es emer Chrysotoxum volaticum Séguy, 1961
— Dark macula on wing margin shorter, never reaching
wing apex and usually leaving the apical area of the
radial cell R, clear, if extending beyond the apex of R,
not reaching the costal border of cell R,,,; scutellum
black with at most apex narrowly yellow, sometimes
with small yellow macula or narrow yellow fascia,
anterior part black (in extensively yellow coloured
specimens sometimes also a yellow fascia along the
anterior margin); frons immediately above lunule
black to blackish-brown; genae below eyes with a
black fascia and hypostomal bridge yellow, in dark
Specimens genae entirely black and hypostomal
bridge brownish-black ........0..0..00ccccccccsececetteeeeeeees
Pech tad Chrysotoxum bicinctum (Linnaeus, 1758)
Additional records of species of Chrysotoxum from
Spain
Chrysotoxum cautum (Harris, 1776)
Distribution. Widespread throughout Europe. Recorded
from several Spanish provinces, from Alicante to Lugo
(Ricarte & Marcos-Garcia, 2017).
Examined material. Spain: 4<, 59 (MZW), Zaragoza,
Hoya de Huesca county, Murillo de Gallego, 1-V-2010,
M.P. van Zuyen.
Remarks. This is an easily recognizable species based
on the extensively yellow abdomen, the large male gen-
italia and the cleft in female tergum V. This 1s the first
record for the province of Zaragoza.
Chrysotoxum cisalpinum Rondani, 1845
Distribution. Widespread in the Mediterranean region.
In Spain, recorded only from the provinces of Madrid
and Salamanca (Ricarte & Marcos-Garcia, 2017; Ricarte
et al. 2018).
Examined material. Spain: 1 (JSA), Albacete, Sierra
de Alcaraz, Batan del Puerto, 38°34’ N 2°21’ W, 1200 m,
21-VI-2003, J. van Steenis; 5, 42 (JSA), 49 (MZW),
Sierra de Alcaraz, Puerto de las Crucetillas, 38°31’ N
2°26’ W, 1400 m, 21-VI-2003, J. van Steenis & M.P. van
Zuijen; 24, 12 (JSA), Sierra de Alcaraz, Puerto de las
Crucetillas, 38°32’ N 2°24’ W, 1200 m, 21-VI-2003, J.
van Steenis; 24, 12 (JSA), 14 (MZW), Sierra de Al-
caraz, Puerto de las Crucetillas, 38°32’ N 2°23’ W, 1000-
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 141-155
1200 m, 22-VI-2003, J. van Steenis & M.P. van Zuijen;
14 (DDG), Ridpar, Sierra de Alcaraz, 38°30’17°N,
2°27 36°W, 750 m, 14-VI-2003, D. Doczkal; 42 (ASW),
Espineras de Leon, Sierra de Alcaraz, close to Rio de los
Endrinales, 38°32715”N, 2°24718’W, 1380 m, 14-VI-
2003, A. Ssymank.
Remarks. This species is easy to recognize based on the
predominantly yellow frons (Figs 1A, 5A). Most of the
specimens were collected on flowers of Thapsia villosa.
This is the first record for the province of Albacete.
Chrysotoxum festivum Linnaeus, 1758
Distribution. A widespread species in the Palaearctic
region. In Spain recorded from several provinces in the
northern half (Ricarte & Marcos-Garcia, 2017).
Examined material. Spain: 14, 49. (JSA), Lleida, Sort,
Col del Canto, 38°22717” N 1°14’10” E, 1725 m, 18-
VII-2014, J. van Steenis.
Remarks. These specimens (Fig. 1B) differ from cen-
tral European specimens of Chrysotoxum festivum by the
entirely black hypostomal bridge (Fig. 5B); sternum II
entirely black, anteriorly with yellow macula in C. fes-
tivum, black facial vitta very broad, broader than in oth-
er specimens; wing extensively bare of microtrichia, at
most along anterior margin of cell Cu narrowly bare in
C. festivum. Further Iberian material and a study of rele-
vant type species is needed to establish the true identity
of these specimens. This is the first record for the prov-
ince of Lleida.
Chrysotoxum gracile Becker, 1921
Distribution. Spain and France (Becker, 1921; Speight
et al., 2013). In Spain, recorded only from the provinces
of Avila, Huesca and Madrid (Ricarte & Marcos-Garcia,
2017).
Examined material. Spain: 3, 12 (MZW), Albacete,
Sierra de Alcaraz, Puerto de las Crucetillas, 38°32’ N
2°24’ W, 1100 m, 21-VI-2003, M.P. van Zuijen; 19
(JSA), Albacete, Sierra de Alcaraz, Puerto de las Cru-
cetillas, 38°31’ N 2°26’ W, 1400 m, 21-VI-2003, J.
van Steenis; 34 (CPP), Cantabria, Potes, Las IlIces,
43°06°41”N, 4°45’27” W, 754 m, 26-VI-2017, CJ Palmer;
12 (CEUA), Madrid, Universidad Rey Don Juan Carlos,
en Sil. rupestris, 21-VII-2011, Chrysotoxum festivum?
det. M’°A. Marcos, Chrysotoxum gracile det. Ricarte and
Nedeljkovic X-2019 (103); 23 (CPP), Palencia, Alto de
la Varga, 42°54’32”N, 4°387°33” W, 1404 m, 24-VI-2017,
CJ Palmer.
©ZFMK
First records of Chrysotoxum volaticum from Europe and Platycheirus marokkanus from Spain | ee
Remarks. This species (Fig. 1C) can be identified using
the key in Speight et al. (2016). The narrower abdomen
and the bicoloured metafemur, although sometimes very
vague, are good characters to separate this species from
Chrysotoxum festivum in which the abdomen is wider
and the metafemur is almost entirely darkish orange-yel-
low, strongly contrasting with the yellow metatibia. The
specimens from Sierra de Alcaraz were found visiting
flowers of Thapsia villosa, while that from Madrid was
found in flowers of Silene rupestris L. This is the first
record for the province of Albacete.
Chrysotoxum octomaculatum Curtis, 1837
Distribution. Widespread in Central and Southern Eu-
rope. In Spain, scattered records from Alicante to Pon-
tevedra (Ricarte & Marcos-Garcia, 2017).
Examined material. Spain: 22 (JSA), Albacete, Si-
erra de Alcaraz, Batan del Puerto, 38°34’ N 2°21’ W,
1200 m, 21-VI-2003, J. van Steenis; 14 (MZW), Sier-
ra de Alcaraz, Puerto de las Crucetillas, 38°32’ N 2°24’
W, 1100 m, 21-VI-2003, M.P. van Zuijen; 12 (JSA),
12 (MZW), Sierra de Alcaraz Puerto de las Crucetillas,
38°31’ N 2°26’ W, 1400 m, 21-VI-2003, J. van Steenis &
M.-P. van Zuijen; 24, 39 (JSA), 12 (MZW), Sierra de
Alcaraz, Puerto de las Crucetillas, 38°32’ N 2°23’ W,
1000-1200 m, 22-VI-2003, J. van Steenis & M.P. van
Zuijen; 14, 12 (ASW), 2 3 (DDG), Ridpar, Sierra de
Alcaraz, 38°30°17°N, 2°27°36”W, 775 m, 14-VI-2003,
A. Ssymank & D. Doczkal; 24 (ASW), 34, 22 (DDG),
Espineras del Leon, Sierra de Alcaraz, close to Rio de
los Endrinales, 38°32’15”N, 2°24’18”’W, 1380 m, 14-
VI-2003, A. Ssymank & D. Doczkal; 1¢ (CPP), Can-
tabria, Potes, Las Ilces, 43°06’41”N 4°45’27°W, 26-VI-
2017, 754 m, C.J. Palmer; 64, 19 (ASW), 8 ¢ (DDG),
Granada, Cortijo los Capotes, Almijara, 36°52’44”N,
3°43°54”°W, 1240-1270 m,11-VI-2003, A. Ssymank &
D. Doczkal; 24 (ASW), 1 3 (DDG), Bosque del Puerto
Navazo, Alhama de Granada, Quercus rotundifolia-for-
est, 36°58’29"N, 4°00°59"W, 1180 m, 12-VI-2003, A.
Ssymank & D. Doczkal; 19 (DDG), Jaén, Sierra More-
na, Rio Guarrizas, 36°24’27°N 3°23’°00’W, 790 m, 13-
VI-2003, D. Doczkal; 3 (CPP), Palencia, Cervera de
Pisuerga, 42°52’24”N 4°31>17»W, 1144 m, 23-VI-2017,
CJ Palmer.
Remarks. This is a large and extensively yellow coloured
species, especially in southern populations (Fig. 2C),
although two smaller and rather dark specimens were
collected (Fig. 2D), somewhat resembling Chrysotoxum
verralli Collin, 1940. Most of the specimens were col-
lected while visiting flowers of Thapsia villosa. These
are the first record for the province of Albacete, Canta-
bria, Granada and Jaén.
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 141-155
Records of species of Platycheirus marokkanus from
Spain
Platycheirus marokkanus Kassebeer, 1998
Distribution. Morocco and Portugal (Kassebeer, 1998;
van Eck, 2016). New to Spain.
Examined material. Spain: ~ (JSA), Albacete, Sierra
de Alcaraz, Batan del Puerto, 38°34’ N 2°21’ W, 1200 m,
21-VI-2003, J. van Steenis; 1 4 (DDG), Granada, Almi-
jara, Cortijo los Capotes, 36°52’44N, 3°43’54°W, 1240-
1270 m, 11-VI-2003, D. Doczkal.
Remarks. This species (Fig. 6) belongs to the Platychei-
rus albimanus sub-group and is most similar to P. laskai
Nielsen, 1999. In P. albimanus (Fabricius, 1781), P. cil-
iatus Bigot, 1884 and P. muelleri Marcuzzi, 1941 the
apex of the protibia and the first tarsomere of protarsus
is much wider than in P. marokkanus, and in P. nigrofem-
oratus Kanervo, 1934 the first tarsomere of protarsus is
clearly wider than the maximum width of the protibia. In
P. laskai, P. marokkanus and P. nigrofemoratus the se-
tae on the protibia are short, at most as long as medial
width of protibia, while in the other species these setae
are long, more than twice as long as medial width of pro-
tibia. The angle of approximation of the eyes in males
is 90° in P. albimanus, P. laskai and P. nigrofemoratus;
about 100° in P. marokkanus; and about 120° in P. cilia-
tus and P. muelleri. Two species each have one character
not shared with any other species; P. /askai has only one
long black seta on profemur, which is placed apically,
all others have three setae placed baso-medially; P. cilia-
tus has the basal tuft of setae on profemur with slightly
flattened apex, while in all others the apex of these setae
is narrowly rounded. In P. muelleri the ventral surface
of protarsus has characteristic black markings, while in
P. marokkanus these markings are reduced and at most
dark-brownish.
The male specimen from Albacete was collected on
flowers of Thapsia villosa.
DISCUSSION
The genus Chrysotoxum has been studied intensively
during the past decade and several cryptic species have
been described (e.g., Nedeljkovic¢ et al. 2013, 2015; Vujic¢
et al. 2017), with focus on the Balkan Peninsula and the
Middle East fauna. These studies revealed a reality that
some taxonomists knew beforehand (e.g., Sommaggio
2001): there are species complexes within Chrysotoxum.
The genus shows large inter- and intraspecific variability
in adult characters and an almost lack of species specif-
ic characters in genital morphology (Sommaggio 2001;
Nedeljkovic¢ et al. 2013) and the use of molecular data
©ZFMK
[52 Jeroen van Steenis et al.
showed a similar degree of variability (Masetti et al.
2006; Nedeljkovic et al. 2015), a fact corroborated with
our new DNA barcodes. The material of Chrysotoxum
volaticum collected by the authors in Spain was compared
to the type material of Séguy in the National History Mu-
seum in Paris (Muséum Nationale d’ Histoire Naturelle)
and can be clearly assigned to Chrysotoxum volaticum
Séguy, 1961. The validity of the species C. volaticum
appears to be confirmed not only by morphology but
also by the simultaneous co-occurrence of this species
and C. bicinctum in the Spanish and French Pyrenees,
plus the presence of several intermediate specimens. The
majority of specimens of Chrysotoxum bicinctum and
C. volaticum can be identified without doubt. Only in a
few cases yellow forms of C. bicinctum could be identi-
fied as C. volaticum and dark forms of C. volaticum could
be identified as C. bicinctum.
Species identification using molecular characters has
been argued as an application of DNA barcoding (Hebert
et al. 2003a, 2003b). The use of DNA barcodes to distin-
guish species is based on the so-called “barcoding gap”
(Meyer & Paulay 2005), in other words, that the intraspe-
cific genetic distance of one species is much less than the
interspecific distance between this species and its clos-
est relative. The published literature is full of examples
where there is no barcode gap between a group of species
(e.g., Wiemers & Fiedler 2007; Robinson et al. 2009; van
Velzen et al. 2012; Koroiva & Kvist 2017). It seems that
the geographical scale is one of the reasons that explains
the low or high intraspecific variation of the COI gene
(Bergsten et al. 2012), which strongly depends on taxo-
nomic groups and practices (Candek & Kuntner 2015).
In the family Syrphidae, some published datasets already
point out that the use of COI as DNA barcode does not
help in species identification as the barcoding gap does
not exist in certain species groups or genera, e.g., Men-
gual et al. (2006) and Stahls et al. (2009) for Merodon
Meigen, 1803, Haarto and Stahls (2014) for Me/anosto-
ma Schiner, 1860, Jordaens et al. (2015) for some Afro-
tropical species and genera, Nedeljkovic et al. (2018) for
Xanthogramma Schiner, 1860, Moriniere et al. (2019) for
some species of the German hoverfly fauna, among oth-
ers. Masetti et al. (2006) were the first to report very low
interspecific molecular divergence among Chrysotoxum
species. Skevington and Sommaggio (2009) pointed
out this problem for the Nearctic species of Chrysotox-
um. The lack of resolution when using DNA barding in
Chrysotoxum was again stated for the Palaearctic spe-
cies in Nedeljkovi¢ et al. (2013) and from the results of
large barcoding campaigns, such as “German Barcode of
Life” (GBOL, www.bolgermany.de; Geiger et al. 2016)
and “Barcoding Fauna Bavarica” (BFB, www.faunaba-
varica.de; Haszprunar 2009). Our new DNA barcodes
of C. volaticum are identical to sequences of C. festivum
and C. bicinctum, and are very similar (>99%) with other
Chrysotoxum species of the BIN BOLD:AAJ0967. New
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 141-155
molecular markers need to be studied to prove their suit-
ability for species identification in the genus Chrysotox-
um, but so far, the 5’ region of the COI gene performs
very poorly.
The habitat in the Sierra de Alcaraz where Chryso-
toxum volaticum was collected, with grassy vegetation
in the vicinity of a brook in a valley at high altitude in
a mountain range, is comparable to the situation de-
scribed by Claussen & Hauser (1990) for the localities
from the Middle Atlas Mountains in Morocco. All other
specimens from central and northern Spain were mostly
collected in Quercus pyrenaica Willd. forests and, in the
case of the specimens from Cabafieros N.P., the sampling
locality had forest with a peat-bog and a temporal stream.
In Spain, adults of C. volaticum were observed on flow-
ers of Thapsia villosa L. (yellow-flowering tall Apiace-
ae) which were in full flower. Thapsia villosa, together
with other plants, was also recorded as a visited flower by
Marcos-Garcia (1986). Many individuals were observed
on the flowers, amongst other species of Chrysotoxum,
wasps and other Diptera. These are the first data about
flowers visited by C. volaticum.
Although some specimens have overlapping characters
of C. volaticum and C. bicinctum, see under the remarks
section of C. bicinctum, most studied specimen can be
assigned clearly to either one. More specimens from oth-
er parts of their distributional range need to be studied,
especially the intermediate forms from the Pyrenees, in
order to corroborate the validity of the morphological
characters used here to separate these two species and to
define better the species within this species group. This is
part of ongoing research to study the species of the genus
Chrysotoxum (Ricarte et al. 2019). The Ibero-Maghreb
Chrysotoxum fauna is in need of a thorough revision.
Hopefully though, this paper will aid in the recognition
of these species as faunistic elements of the Iberian Pen-
insula.
Acknowledgments. The study of the material of Chrysotox-
um in the NHM was made possible by receiving support from
the SYNTHESYS project http://www.synthesys.info/ which is
financed by European Community Research Infrastructure Ac-
tion under the FP6 “Structuring the European Research Area”
Programme. Financial support was also provided by the Span-
ish Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia (projects CGL2005-
07213/BOS and CGL2006-13847-C02-01). Antonio Ricarte’s
position (Ref. UATALOS) at the University of Alicante is fund-
ed by the ‘Vicerrectorado de Investigacion y Transferencia de
Conocimiento’. Claus Claussen, Flensburg, kindly checked the
characters with his own material from Chrysotoxum volaticum
and made valuable comments. Nigel Wyatt (NHM, London)
kindly loaned material of C. bicinctum for study. Christophe
Daugeron (Paris, France) allowed us to study the type material
of Séguy during a short stay in Paris. Bastiaan Wakkie (Brus-
sels, Belgium) is acknowledged for his company on a collecting
trip during the International Syrphidae Symposium in 2003. We
thank Pasquale Ciliberti (Leiden, the Netherlands), Mercedes
Paris (Madrid, Spain), Menno Reemer (Leiden, the Nether-
©ZFMK
First records of Chrysotoxum volaticum from Europe and Platycheirus marokkanus from Spain 13
lands), André van Eck (Tilburg, the Netherlands) and Sander
Bot (Haren, the Netherlands) for the possibility of studying
specimens in their care. Chris Palmer (Portsmouth, UK) is ap-
preciated for the English proof reading of the manuscript and
additional material.
REFERENCES
Amoros-Jiménez R, Pineda A, Fereres A, Marcos-Garcia MA
(2012) Prey availability and abiotic requirements of imma-
ture stages of the aphid predator Sphaerophoria rueppellii.
Biological Control 63: 17—24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bio-
control.2012.06.001
Bergsten J, Bilton DT, Fujisawa T, Elliott M, Monaghan MT,
Balke M, Hendrich L, Geijer J, Herrmann J, Foster GN, Ri-
bera I, Nilsson AN, Barraclough TG, Vogler AP (2012) The
effect of geographical scale of sampling on DNA barcoding.
Systematic biology 61(5): 851-869. https://doi.org/10.1093/
sysbio/sys037
Bot S, Van de Meutter F. 2019. Veldgids Zweefvliegen. KNNV
Uitgeverij, Zeist.
Bugg RL, Colfer RG, Chaney WE, Smith HA, Cannon J (2008)
Flower flies (Syrphidae) and other biological control agents
for aphids in vegetable crops. UC ANR Publication 8285.
Online at http://anrcatalog.ucanr.edu/pdf/8285.pdf [last ac-
cessed 23 May 2020]
Candek K, Kuntner M (2015) DNA barcoding gap: reliable
species identification over morphological and geographical
scales. Molecular Ecology Resources 15: 268-277. https://
doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12304
Claussen C (1989) Syrphiden aus Marokko (Diptera, Syrphi-
dae). Entomofauna, Zeitschrift ftir Entomologie 10(24):
357-375
Claussen C, Hauser M (1990) Neue Syrphidenvorkommen aus
Marokko und Tunesien (Diptera, Syrphidae). Entomofauna,
Zeitschrift fir Entomologie 11 (25): 433-438
De Courcy Williams M, Toussidou M, Speight MCD (2011)
Hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae) new to Greece from the
Rhodope Mountains of Thrace and eastern Macedonia, in-
cluding Simosyrphus scutellaris new to Europe. Dipterists
Digest 18: 181-198
Dirickx, H.G. (1994): Atlas des Dipteres syrphides de la région
méditerranéenne. Studiedocumenten van het K.B.ILN. 75.
RBINS, Brussels
Geiger M, Moriniere J, Hausmann A, Haszprunar G, Wagele
W, Hebert P, Rulik B (2016) Testing the Global Malaise Trap
Program — How well does the current barcode reference li-
brary identify flying insects in Germany? Biodiversity Data
Journal 4: e10671. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e10671
Gil-Collado, J. (1930) Monografia de los Sirfidos de Espafia.
Trabajos del Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (Serie
Zoologica) 54: 1-376
Haarto A, Stahls G (2014) When mtDNA COT is misleading:
congruent signal of ITS2 molecular marker and morphology
for North European Me/anostoma Schiner, 1860 (Diptera,
Syrphidae). ZooKeys 431: 93-134. https://doi.org/10.3897/
zookeys.43 1.7207
Haszprunar G (2009) Barcoding Fauna Bavarica — eine
Chance fiir die Entomologie. Nachrichtenblatt bayeri-
scher Entomologen 58 (1/2): 45-47. Online at https://
www.zobodat.at/pdf/NachBlBayEnt_058 0045-0047.
pdf [last accessed 23 May 2020]
Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003a) Bio-
logical identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 141-155
of the Royal Society of London B 270: 313-321. https://do1.
org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2218
Hebert PDN, Ratnasingham S, DeWaard JR (2003b) Barcod-
ing animal life: Cytochrome C oxidase subunit 1 divergences
among closely related species. Proceedings of the Royal So-
ciety of London B 270: S96—S99. https://doi.org/10.1098/
rsbl.2003.0025
Inouye D, Larson BMH, Ssymank A, Kevan PG (2015) Flies
and flowers III: Ecology of foraging and pollination. Jour-
nal of Pollination Ecology 16 (16): 115-133. IUCN (2018)
Hoverfly. https://www.iucn.org/commissions/ssc-groups/in-
vertebrates/hoverfly
Jordaens K, Goergen G, Virgilio M, Backeljau T, Vokaer A, De
Meyer M (2015) DNA barcoding to improve the taxonomy
of the Afrotropical hoverflies (Insecta: Diptera: Syrphidae).
PLoS ONE 10 (10): e0140264. https://do1.org/10.1371/jour-
nal.pone.0140264
Kassebeer CF (1998) Die marokkanischen Arten der Gattung
Platycheirus Le Peletier & Serville, 1828 (Diptera, Syrphi-
dae). Dipteron 1 (2): 25-36
Koroiva R, Kvist S (2017) Estimating the barcoding gap in a
global dataset of coxl sequences for Odonata: close, but no
cigar. Mitochondrial DNA Part A 29 (5): 765-771. https://
doi.org/10.1080/24701394.2017.1357709
Lardé G (1989) Investigation on some factors affecting larval
growth in a coffee-pulp bed. Biological Wastes 30: 11-19.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7483(89)90139-0
Marcos-Garcia, M.A. (1986): Los Syrphidae (Diptera) de las
sierras occidentales del Sistema Central espafiol: Subfamili-
as: Chrysotoxinae, Sphegininae, Chilosiinae, Pelecocerinae,
Volucellinae y Cinxiinae. Boletin de la Asociacion espafiola
de Entomologia 10: 159-180
Marcos-Garcia, M.A. (1990): Catalogo preliminar de los Syr-
phidae (Diptera) de la Cordillera Cantabrica (Espafia). EOS
66 (2): 83-100
Martinez-Falcon AP, Marcos-Garcia MA, Moreno CE,
Rotheray GE (2012) A critical role for Copestylum lar-
vae (Diptera, Syrphidae) in the decomposition of cac-
tus forests. Journal of Arid Environments 78: 41-48.
https://dot.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.10.010
Masetti A, Lucetti A, Sommaggio D, Burgio D, Mantovani B
(2006) Phylogeny of Chrysotoxum species (Diptera: Syrphi-
dae) inferred from morphological and molecular characters.
European Journal of Entomology 103: 439-467. https://doi.
org/10.14411/eje.2006.059
Mengual X, Stahls G, Laska P, Mazanek L, Rojo S (2018) Mo-
lecular phylogenetics of the predatory lineage of flower flies
Eupeodes-Scaeva (Diptera: Syrphidae), with the description
of the Neotropical genus Austroscaeva gen. nov. Journal of
Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 56: 148—
169. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzs.12212 Corrigendum: https://
doi.org/10.1111/jzs.12282
Mengual X, Stahls G, Vuji¢ A, Marcos-Garcia MA
(2006) Integrative taxonomy of Iberian Merodon spe-
cies (Diptera, Syrphidae). Zootaxa 1377: 1-26.
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1377.1.1
Meyer CP, Paulay G (2005) DNA barcoding: Error rates based
on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biol. 3:2229-2238.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030422
Moriniére J, Balke M, Doczkal D, et al. (2019) A DNA barcode
library for 5,200 German flies and midges (Insecta: Diptera)
and its implications for metabarcoding-based biomonitoring
Molecular Ecology Resources 19(4): 900-928. https://doi.
org/10.1111/1755-0998. 13022
©ZFMK
154 Jeroen van Steenis et al.
Nedeljkovic Z, Aéanski J, Dan M, Obreht-Vidakovi¢ D, Ri-
carte A, Vuji¢ A (2015) An integrated approach to delimit-
ing species borders in the genus Chrysotoxum Meigen, 1803
(Diptera: Syrphidae), with description of two new species.
Contributions to Zoology 84: 285-304
Nedeljkovic Z, Aéanski J, Vuji¢ A, Obreht D, Dan M, Stahls
G, Radenkovi¢ S (2013) Taxonomy of Chrysotoxum fes-
tivum Linnaeus, 1758 (Diptera: Syrphidae) — an integrative
approach. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 169:
84-102
Nedeljkovié Z, Ricarte A, Sa8ié Zori¢ L, Dan M, Obreht Vida-
kovi¢ D, Vuyjic A (2018) The genus Xanthogramma Schiner,
1861 (Diptera: Syrphidae) in southeastern Europe, with de-
scriptions of two new species. Canadian Entomologist 150
(4): 440-464. https://do1.org/10.4039/tce.2018.21
Nielsen TR (1999) Check-list and distribution maps of Norwe-
gian Hoverflies, with description of Platycheirus laskai nov.
sp. (Diptera, Syrphidae). NINA Fagrapport 35: 1-99
Pérez-Bafion, C. (1995) Tesis de Licenciatura: Estudio de la
comunidad de sirfidos de las sierras valencianas del Negrete
y Utiel (Diptera, Syrphidae). Facultad de Ciencias, Universi-
dad de Alicante, Spain
Pineda A, Marcos-Garcia MA (2008) Evaluation of several
strategies to increase the residence time of Episyrphus bal-
teatus (Diptera, Syrphidae) releases in sweet pepper green-
houses. Annals of applied biology 152 (3): 271-276. https://
doi.org/10.1111/).1744-7348.2008.00215.x
Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN (2013) A DNA-based registry for
all animal species: the Barcode Index Number (BIN) system.
PLOS ONE 8 (7): e66213. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.
pone.0066213
Ricarte A, Marcos-Garcia MA (2017) A checklist of the Syrphi-
dae (Diptera) of Spain, Andorra and Gibraltar. Zootaxa 4216
(5): 401-440. https://do1.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4216.5.1
Ricarte A, Nencioni A, Tubié NK, Grkovic A, Vuji¢ A, Mar-
cos-Garcia MA. (2018) The hoverflies of an oak Dehesa from
Spain, with a new species and other insights into the taxono-
my of the Eumerus tricolor group (Diptera: Syrphidae). An-
nales Zoologici 68: 259-280. https://doi.org/10.3161/000345
41ANZ2018.68.2.005
Ricarte A. (2008) Tesis Doctoral: Biodiversidad de sirfidos
(Diptera: Syrphidae) y conservacion de los habitats en el
Parque Nacional de Cabafieros, Espafia. Universidad de AI-
icante, 244 + 27 pp. Available from: http://rua.ua.es/dspace/
handle/10045/9663 [last accessed 9 Jan. 2018]
Ricarte A, Nedeljkovi¢ Z, Marcos-Garcia MA. (2019) A pre-
liminary revision of the Spanish Chrysotoxum Meigen and
Xanthogramma Schiner hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae).
Book of abstracts of the 10th International Symposium on
Syrphidae (ISS10): 53.
Robinson E, Blagoev GA, Hebert PDN, Adamowicz SJ
(2009) Prospects for using DNA barcoding to identify spi-
ders in species-rich genera. ZooKeys 16: 27-46. https://doi.
org/10.3897/zookeys. 16.239
Rotheray GE, Gilbert F (1999) Phylogeny of Palaearctic Syr-
phidae (Diptera): evidence from larval stages. Zoologi-
cal Journal of the Linnean Society 127: 1-112. https://doi.
org/10.1111/).1096-3642.1999 tb01305.x
Rotheray GE, Gilbert F (2011) The natural history of hoverflies.
Forrest Text, Ceredigion, Wales
Rotheray GE, Marcos-Garcia MA, Hancock G, Pérez-Bafion
C, Maier CT (2009) Neotropical Copestylum (Diptera,
Syrphidae) breeding in Agavaceae and Cactaceae includ-
ing seven new species. Zoological Journal of the Linnean
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 141-155
Society 156 (4): 697-749. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-
3642.2008.00503.x
Rozo-Lopez P, Mengual X (2015) Mosquito species (Diptera,
Culicidae) in three ecosystems from the Colombian Andes:
identification through DNA barcoding and adult morphol-
ogy. ZooKeys 513: 39-64. https://doi.org/10.3897/zook-
eys.513.9561
Séguy E (1961) Dipteres Syrphidés de |’Europe occidentale.
Mémoires du Muséum national d’histoire naturelle, Nouv.
Ser., A, Zoologie 23. Paris, France
Skevington JH, Sommaggio D (2009) An intractable problem?
Revision of Nearctic Chrysotoxum. Pp. 49-51 in: Radenkov-
i¢ S (ed.) The book of abstract, 5 International Symposium
on Syrphidae, Novi Sad, Serbia
Sommaggio D (2001) The species of the genus Chrysotoxum
Meigen, 1822 (Diptera: Syrphidae) described by Giglio Tos.
Bolletino Museo Regionale die Scienze Naturali Torino 18:
115-126
Speight MCD, Nedeljkovi¢ Z, Lebard T (2016) Chrysotox-
um tomentosum Giglio-Tos,1890 et Epistrophe cryptica
Doczkal & Schmid, 1994 en France, avec une clef pour les
especes frangaises de Chrysotoxum (Diptera: Syrphidae).
Bulletin de la Société Linnéenne de Bordeaux 151: 225—235
Speight MCD, Sarthou V, Garrigue J (2013) Brachyopa silviae,
Chrysotoxum gracile and Eumerus pusillus (Diptera: Syrphi-
dae) new to France. Dipterists Digest 20: 33-40
Ssymank A, Doczkal D (2007) Contributions to the hover-
fly-fauna (Diptera: Syrphidae) of southern Spain. Poster
presentation 4" international Symposium on Syrphidae, S1i-
karanta, Finland
Ssymank A, Kearns C (2009) Flies-pollinators on two wings.
Pp. 39-52 in: Ssymank A, Hamm A, Vischer-Leopold M
(Eds) Caring for pollinators — safeguarding agro-biodiversity
and wild plant diversity. Bundesamt fiir Naturschutz, Bonn,
Germany. Online at https://www.besnet.world/caring-polli-
nators-safeguarding-agro-biodiversity-and-wild-plant-diver-
sity-current-progress-and-need [last accessed 23 May 2020]
Stahls G, Vuji¢ A, Pérez-Bafion C, Radenkovi¢ S, Rojo S,
Petanidou T (2009) COI barcodes for identification of
Merodon hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae) of Lesvos Island,
Greece. Molecular Ecology Resources 9: 1431-1438. https://
doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02592.x
Thompson FC (1999) A key to the genera of the flower flies
(Diptera: Syrphidae) of the Neotropical Region including
descriptions of new genera and species and a glossary of tax-
onomic terms used. Contributions to Entomology, Interna-
tional 3: 321-378
van Eck A (2016) Hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae) new to the
fauna of mainland Portugal, with an updated hoverfly check-
list. Boletin de la Sociedad Entomologica Aragonesa 59:
187-203
van Steenis J, Hauser M, van Zuijen MP (2017) Review of the
Eumerus barbarus species group (Diptera: Syrphidae) from
the western Mediterranean Basin. Bonn Zoological Bulletin
66 (2): 145-165. Online at https://www.zoologicalbulletin.
de/BzB_Volumes/Volume_66_2/145_165_BzB66_2 Stee-
nis_et_al.pdf [last accessed 23 May 2020]
van Steenis J, van Steenis W (2014) Two new West-Palaearc-
tic species of Brachyopa Meigen, 1822 (Diptera, Syrphidae)
with description and records of additional European spe-
cies. Norwegian Journal of Entomology 61: 42-52. Online
at — http://www.entomologi.no/journals/nje/2014-1/pdf/nje-
vol61-nol-steenis. pdf [last accessed 23 May 2020]
van Velzen R, Weitschek E, Felici G, Bakker FT (2012). DNA
barcoding of recently diverged species: relative performance
©ZFMK
First records of Chrysotoxum volaticum from Europe and Platycheirus marokkanus from Spain 155
of matching methods. PLoS One 7 (1): e30490. https://doi.
org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030490
Vujic A, Nedeljkovic Z, Hayat R, Demir6zer O, Mengual X,
Kazerani F (2017) New data on the genus Chrysotoxum
Meigen (Diptera: Syrphidae) from North-East Turkey, Ar-
menia, Azerbaijan and Iran including descriptions of three
new species. Zoology in the Middle East 63: 250-268.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09397140.2017.1349241
Bonn zoological Bulletin 69 (1): 141-155
Wiemers M, Fiedler, K (2007) Does the DNA barcoding gap ex-
ist? — a case study in blue butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaeni-
dae). Frontiers in Zoology 4: 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-
9994-4-8
Young AD, Marshall SA, Skevington SH (2016) Revision of
Platycheirus Lepeletier and Serville (Diptera: Syrphidae) in
the Nearctic north of Mexico. Zootaxa 4082: 1-317. https://
doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4082. 1.1
©ZFMK
BHL
i
Blank Page Digitally Inserted