Bothalia
’N TYDSKRIF VIR PLANTKUNDIGE NAVORSING
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Vol. 17,1 July/Julie 1987
BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE • DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND WATER SUPPLY • REPUBLIC OF SOU ,FWCA
NAVORSINGSINSTITUUT VIR PLANTKUNDE • DEPARTEMENT VAN LANDBOU EN WATERVOO RSIENING • REPl'BLiEK VAN >AFPIKA
PUBLICATIONS OF THE BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
PUBLIKASIES VAN DIE NAVORSINGSINSTITUUT VIR PLANTKUNDE
Obtainable from the Division of Agricultural Information, De-
partment of Agriculture and Water Supply, Private Bag X144,
Pretoria 0001, Republic of South Africa. A current price list of
all available publications will be issued on request.
BOTHALIA
Bothalia is named in honour of General Louis Botha, first Premier
and Minister of Agriculture of the Union of South Africa. This
house journal of the Botanical Research Institute is devoted to
the furtherance of botanical science. The main fields covered
are taxonomy, ecology, anatomy and cytology. Two parts of the
journal and an index to contents, authors and subjects are publish-
ed annually.
Verkrygbaar van die Afdeling Landbou-inligting, Departement
van Landbou en Watervoorsiening, Privaatsak X144, Pretoria
0001, Republiek van Suid-Afrika. ’n Geldige lys van alle beskik-
bare publikasies kan aangevra word.
Bothalia is vernoem ter ere van Generaal Louis Botha eerste Eerste
Minister en Minister van Landbou van die Unie van Suid-Afrika
Hierdie lyfblad van die Navorsingsinstituut virPlantkundeisgewy
aan die bevordering van die wetenskap van plantkunde. Die hoof-
gebiede wat gedek word, is taksonomie, ekologie, anatomie en
sitologie. Een of twee dele van die tydskrif en ’n indeks van die
inhoud, outeurs en onderwerpe verskyn jaarliks.
MEMOIRS OF THE BOTANICAL SURVEY OF SOUTH AFRICA
MEMOIRS VAN DIE BOTANIESE OPNAME VAN SUID-AFRIKA
The memoirs are individual treatises usually of an ecological
nature, but sometimes dealing with taxonomy or economic
botany.
’n Reeks van losstaande omvattende verhandelings oor vemaam-
lik ekologiese, maar soms ook taksonomiese of plantekonomiese
onderwerpe.
THE FLOWERING PLANTS OF AFRICA / DIE BLOMPLANTE VAN AFRIKA
This serial presents colour plates of African plants with ac-
companying text. The plates are prepared mainly by the artists
at the Botanical Research Institute. Many well-known botanical
artists have contributed to the series, such as Cythna Letty (over
700 plates), Kathleen Lansdell, Stella Gower, Betty Connell,
Peter Bally and Fay Anderson. The Editor is pleased to receive
living plants of general interest or of economic value for
illustration.
Two parts of ten plates each are published annually. A volume
consists of four parts. The publication is available in English and
Afrikaans.
Hierdie reeks bied kleurplate van Afrikaanse plante met bygaan-
de teks. Die skilderye word meestal deur die kunstenaars van die
Navorsingsinstituut vir Plantkunde voorberei. Talle bekende bota-
niese kunstenaars het tot die reeks bygedra, soos Cythna Letty
(meer as 700 plate), Kathleen Lansdell, Stella Gower, Betty Con-
nell, Peter Bally en Fay Anderson. Die Redakteur verwelkom
lewende plante van algemene belang of ekonomiese waarde vir
afbeelding.
Twee dele, elk met tien plate, word jaarliks gepubliseer, ’n Volume
bestaan uit vier dele. Die publikasie is beskikbaar in Afrikaans en
Engels.
FLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA / FLORA VAN SUIDELIKE AFRIKA
A taxonomic treatise on the flora of tire Republic of South Africa,
Ciskei, Transkei, Lesotho, Swaziland, Bophuthatswana, South
West Africa/Namibia, Botswana and Venda. The FSA contains
descriptions of families, genera, species, infraspecific taxa, keys
to genera and species, synonymy, literature and limited specimen
citations, as well as taxonomic and ecological notes. Also available
in the FSA series are the following:
’n Taksonomiese verhandeling oor die flora van die Republiek
van Suid-Afrika, Ciskei, Transkei, Lesotho, Swaziland, Bophu-
thatswana, SWA/Namibie, Botswana en Venda. Die FSA bevat
beskrywings van families, genusse, spesies, infraspesifieke taksons,
sleutels tot genusse en spesies, sinonimie, literatuur, verwysings
na enkele eksemplare, asook beknopte taksonomiese en ekologiese
aantekeninge. Ook beskikbaar in die FSA-reeks is die volgende:
The genera of southern African flowering plants by/deur R.A. Dyer, VoL 1 Dicotyledons (1975); Vol. 2
Monocotyledons ( 1976).
Keys to families and index to the genera of southern African flowering plants by/deur R.A. Dyer (1977).
Plant exploration of southern Africa by Mary Gunn & L.E. Codd. Obtainable from/Beskikbaar van:
A. A. Balkema Marketing, Box/Posbus 317, Claremont 7735, RSA.
PALAEOFLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA / PALAEOFLORA VAN SUIDELIKE AFRIKA.
A palaeoflora on a pattern comparable to that of the Flora of
southern Africa. Much of the information is presented in the
form of tables and photographic plates depicting fossil popula-
tions. Now available:
’n Palaeoflora met ’n uitleg vergelykbaar met die van die Flora
van suidelike Afrika. Baie van die inligting word aangebied in die
vorm van tabelle en fotografiese plate waarop fossiele populasies
afgebeeld word. Reeds beskikbaar:
Molteno Formation (Triassic) Vol. 1 Introduction. Dicroidium by/deur J.M. & H.M. Anderson.
Prodromus of South African Megafloras. Devonian to Lower Cretaceous by/deur J.M. & H.M. Anderson.
Obtainable from/Beskikbaar van: A. A. Balkema Marketing, Box/Posbus 3 1 7, Claremont 7735, RSA.
Republic of
South Africa
Republiek van
Suid-Afrika
BOTHALIA
’N TYDSKRIF VIR PLANTKUNDIGE NAVORSING
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Volume 17,1
Editor/Redakteur: O. A. Leistner
Editorial Board/Redaksieraad
D. F. Cutler
B. de Winter
D. J. B. Killick
O. A. Leistner
P. H. Raven
J. P. Rourke
M. J. Werger
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK
Botanical Research Institute, Pretoria, RSA
Botanical Research Institute, Pretoria, RSA
Botanical Research Institute, Pretoria, RSA
Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, USA
National Botanic Gardens, Kirstenbosch, RSA
University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
ISSN 0006 8241
Published by the Botanical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and Water Supply, Private Bag X101 ,
Pretoria 000 1 , South Africa
Uitgegee deurdie Navorsingsinstituut vir Plantkunde, Departement van Landbou en Watervoorsiening,
Privaatsak X 1 0 1 , Pretoria 0001 , Suid-Afrika
1987
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2016
https ://arch i ve . o rg/detai Is/bothal iavo Iume1717unse
CONTENTS — INHOUD
Volume 17,1
1 . The Indigoferafilifolia complex (Fabaceae) in southern Africa. J. K. JAR VIE and C. H. STIRTON 1
2. A synopsis of Tephrosia subgenus Barbistyla (Fabaceae) in southern Africa. B . D. SCHRIRE 7
3. A new species and a new combination of Asclepias (Asclepiadaceae) in southern Africa. A. NICHOLAS ... 17
4. Two new brown subcrustose Parmelia species from southern Africa (lichenized Ascomycetes).
F. BRUSSE 25
5 . Notes on African plants:
Asclepiadaceae. Notes on Asclepias diploglossa, A. cognata and A.flava. A. NICHOLAS 29
Erysiphaceae. Two new Oidium species from the Transvaal. G. J. M. A. GORTER and A. EICKER... 32
Fabaceae. A new species of Indigofera from Natal and Transkei. G. GERMISHUIZEN 33
Lichinaceae. A new species of Gonohymenia from Etosha Pan limestone. F. BRUSSE 35
Lichinaceae. A new species of Thyrea from Otavi dolomite (Damara System). F. BRUSSE 37
Polygonaceae. A new species of Oxygonum from Natal. G. GERMISHUIZEN 40
Teloschistaceae. A new species of Caloplaca from southern Africa. I. KARNEFELT 41
6. Cetraria (Parmeliaceae) and some related genera on the African continent. I. KARNEFELT 45
7. Species groups in the genus Ehrharta (Poaceae) in southern Africa. G. E. GIBBS RUSSELL and
R. P. ELLIS 51
8. Taxonomy of the genus Ehrharta (Poaceae) in southern Africa: the Setacea group. G. E. GIBBS
RUSSELL 67
9. Leaf anatomy of the genus Ehrharta (Poaceae) in southern Africa: the Setacea group. R. P. ELLIS 75
10. Six cultivars of Solarium macrocarpon (Solanaceae) in Ghana. Z. R. BUKENYA and J. B. HALL 91
11. Bibliography of Fusarium (Fungi: Hyphomycetes) in South Africa, 1945-1985. W. F. O. MARASAS,
SANDRA C. LAMPRECHT, P. S. VAN WYK and R. Y. ANELICH 97
12. The genus Rubus (Rosaceae) in South Africa. IV. Natural hybridization. J. J. SPIES, C. H. STIRTON and
H. DUPLESSIS 105
13. Ordination by detrended correspondence analysis (DC A) of the vegetation of Swartboschkloof,
Jonkershoek, Cape Province. D. J. MCDONALD 121
14. Miscellaneous notes:
Chromosome studies on African plants. 3. J. J. SPIES and H. DU PLESSIS 131
Chromosome studies on African plants. 4. J. J. SPIES and A. JONKER 135
Performance of a laboratory-constructed anemometer under summer field conditions on a Mountain
Fynbos experimental site. G. W. DAVIS 136
1 5 . Review of the work of the Botanical Research Institute ,1985/1986 139
16. Book reviews 155
1 7 . Guide for authors to Bothalia 157
Bothalia 17,1: 1-6(1987)
The Indigo fera fili folia complex (Fabaceae) in southern Africa
J. K. JAR VIE* and C. H. STIRTON**
Keywords: Fabaceae, Indigoferafilifolia complex, new species, southern Africa, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
The Indigoferafilifolia Thunb. complex, previously known as a widespread polymorphic species, is segregated into
three species. /. filifolia is retained as a variable species and two allied species, /. gifbergensis C. H. Stirton & J. K. Jarvie
and /. ionii J. K. Jarvie & C. H. Stirton are described as new.
UITTREKSEL
Die Indigofera filifolia Thunb. -kompleks, voorheen bekend as ’n wydverspreide polimorfiese spesie, word in drie
spesies verdeel. /. filifolia word as ’n veelvormige spesie behou en twee verwante spesies, /. gifbergensis C. H. Stirton &
J. K. Jarvie en /. ionii J. K. Jarvie & C. H. Stirton word as nuut beskryf.
INTRODUCTION
The pantropical genus Indigofera comprises some 800
species. It forms a large and distinctive part of the tribe
Indigofereae which also contains two closely related
genera Cyamopsis and Rhynchotropis along with an
anomalous Madagascan genus Phylloxyon (Polhill
1981).
Indigofera was once the main source of indigo dye but
its importance dwindled as cheaper synthetic analogues
were developed to replace the plant source of the dye.
There is, however, a renewed interest in the genus and it
has begun to be of some value as a source of forage
legume (De Kort & Thijsse 1984).
The last major revision of Indigofera in Africa was by
Gillett (1958), who recognized 278 species. He divided
the African representatives into 5 subgenera, 5 sections
and 19 subsections. As this revision was a precursor to a
revision of the genus for the Flora of Tropical East
Africa he treated only 70 species in any detail. The work
is essentially regional and ignores to a considerable ex-
tent areas such as southern Africa.
Our overall knowledge of southern African species of
Indigofera is still dependent on the 1862 revision by
William Harvey. This account was subsequently added
to and modified by the following workers: Baker (1905),
Brown (1925, 1926), Dinter (1932), Fourcade (1932),
Bremekamp (1932), Guthrie, Pillans & Salter (1939),
Dyer (1944), Suessenguth & Merxmiiller (1951), Merx-
miiller & Schreiber (1957), Schreiber (1970) and Stirton
(1982).
The present investigation focuses on the widespread
polymorphic species I. filifolia in South Africa. Gillett
(1958) placed I. filifolia Thunb. as the sole member of
his section Juncifolieae. His diagnosis is limited to the
presence of petioles many times longer than the small
terminal leaflet, persistent when the latter falls off; fruit-
ing pedicels erect and spreading; and endocarp spotted
with seeds ± separated.
We are indebted to Mr Ion Williams for drawing our
attention to a small aphyllous plant which did not appear
to fit the description of I. filifolia. He felt certain that it
represented a new species. We confirm this and name it
I. ionii in his honour. As part of our study we also looked
at all the available South African aphyllous specimens of
Indigofera that seemed pertinent to the I. filifolia group.
We conclude that what had been known as I. filifolia
Thunb. in herbaria should be separated into three spec-
ies: I. filifolia Thunb., I. ionii J. K. Jarvie & C. H.
Stirton, and I. gifbergensis C. H. Stirton & J. K. Jarvie.
KEY TO SPECIES
la Leaflets 3-5, terminal leaflet present, narrowly obovate to obovate, base obtuse; petiole 14-25 mm long; stipules
narrowly triangular; flowers 5-6(7) mm long:
2a Dense, erect shrub up to lm tall; leaflets recurved mucronate, obovate, biramous hairs present on lower sur-
face but restricted to the margin; inflorescence 15-30-flowered; flowers brick-red; calyx-teeth finger-like,
sinus between vexillar teeth narrow; standard broadly elliptic; peg on outer surface of keel blade pointing
downwards; scales absent from base of anthers; upper parts of Filaments uniformly thickened; seeds dark
chestnut or khaki and covered in black blotches and stripes, elliptic 1. gifbergensis
2b Small lax wiry herb, sparsely branched; leaflets with straight mucro, narrowly obovate, biramous hairs
sparsely but evenly distributed over lower surface; inflorescence 6-10-flowered; flowers pink; calyx teeth tri-
angular, sinus between vexillar teeth broad; standard very broadly ovate; peg on outer surface of keel blade
pointing upwards; scales present at base of anthers; upper parts of filaments alternately thick and thin; seeds
olive-green, oblong 2. ionii
lb Leaflets 6-8, upper leaflets absent or reduced to scales, elliptic, base cuneate; petiole 40-60 mm long; stipules
filiform; flowers (7,5) 8,0-10,5 mm long 3. filifolia
* Department of Botany, Plant Sciences Laboratories, University of
Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 2AS, England; currently at Pus- ** B. A. Krukoff Botanist for Legume Research, The Herbarium,
litbangtri. Project ATA-71, Jl. Cimmanggu No. 1, Bogor, Java, Indo- Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, Eng-
nesia. land, UK.
2
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
QUICK-KEY CHARACTERS
1 . Flowers brick-red /. gifbergensis
Flowers pink /. ionii, /. filifolia
2. Leaflets with straight mucro I. ionii, [.filifolia
Leaflets recurved-mucronate I. gifbergensis
3. Anthers tufted; short filaments thicker than long filaments
I. ionii, I. filifolia
Anthers without tufts, filaments uniformly thin ... /. gifbergensis
4. Peg on outer surface of keel blade pointing downwards ... /. ionii
Peg on outer surface of keel blades pointing upwards
/. gifbergensis, I. filifolia
5. Fruits compressed I. ionii
Fruits terete I. gifbergensis, I. filifolia
6. Seeds dark chestnut or khaki, blotched I . gifbergensis
Seeds olive-green I. ionii
Seeds chocolate-brown I. filifolia
1 . Indigofera gifbergensis C. H. Stirton & J. K.
Jarvie, sp. nov. subsectioni Juncifolieae Gillettii prox-
ima.
Frutex erectus lignosus ad 1 m altus, valde ramosus,
caulibus veterioribus glabris, junioribus appresso-strigu-
losis glabrescentibus. Stipulae conferruminatae, basi
petioli adnatae, ad 4 mm longae, anguste triangulares.
Folia regularia, imparipinnata. Foliola obovata, 6-8 x
3.0- 3 ,5 mm, basi obtusa, recurvato-mucronata. Inflo-
rescentiae axillares, racemosae, laxae, 15-30-florae,
sanguineae. Flores 5-6(7) mm longi, unoquoque bractea
caduca anguste triangulari 2, 0-2, 3 mm longa subtenti.
Tubus calycis 1,5 mm longus; lobi calycis omnes
aequales triangulares. Vexillum late ellipticum, 5-6 x
4. 0- 4, 5 mm. Petala alarum 5, 5-6,0 x 2, 0-2, 5 mm.
Laminae carinae 6 x 2-3 mm, manifeste saccatae. An-
therae late apiculatae, ad 0,7-0, 8 longae, squamis basa-
libus absentibus. Pistillum 5 mm longum, subtiliter fim-
briatum. Fructus 25-30 x 2,5-3 ,0 mm, dehiscens; septa
doliiformia, semina secedenta. Semina 2, 5-2, 7 x
1,7-1 ,8 mm, badia, maculis lineisque purpurascentibus.
TYPE. — Cape, Pilaarsberg, north of Pakhuis Pass,
9.1967, Kerfoot 5922 (NBG, holo.!).
Erect shrub up to 1 m tall, dense; woody below, half-
herbaceous above; branches set close, stiff; appressed
strigulose when young but glabrous when mature. Sti-
pules fused, adnate to base of petiole, up to 4 mm long,
acute, glabrous. Leaves scarce, imparipinnate. Leaflets
obovate, 3-5, 6-8 x 3, 0-3, 5 mm, base obtuse, apex
recurved mucronate, glabrous above, covered in few
flattened hairs around margin below. Petiole 14-15 mm
long; petiolules 0,5 mm long. Inflorescences axillary,
racemose, lax, 15-30-flowered; peduncle 60-140 mm
long. Flowers 5-6 (7) mm long, red, each subtended by
a 2, 0-2, 3 mm long, narrowly triangular, rapidly cadu-
cous bract; pedicel < 1 mm long. Calyx 2-3 mm long;
tube 1,5 mm long; teeth equal, 1,5 mm long, triangular,
sparsely fringed with flattened biramous hairs. Standard
broadly elliptic, 5-6 x 4, 0-4, 5 mm; claw short; auricles
absent; apex rounded; appendages absent. Wing petals
5, 5-6,0 x 2, 0-2, 5 mm, upper part flattened near the
margin, raised above but equal in length to the keel
blades, few scattered hairs present. Keel blades 6 mm
long, 2-3 mm wide at maximum, fringed along upper
margin. Androecium 5 mm long; vexillar stamen free;
anthers uniform, 0,7-0, 8 mm long, broadly apiculate,
anthers on long filaments basifixed, anthers on short
filaments dorsifixed; scales absent. Pistil 5, 0-5, 5 mm
long, glabrous, narrowly oblong, sessile, 7-8-ovuled;
style upcurved, height of curvature 2 mm; stigma capi-
tate. Fruits narrowly oblong, 25-30 x 2, 5-3,0 mm,
chestnut-brown, dehiscent; inner surface shiny white;
septa up to 2 mm wide, barrel-shaped, separating the
seeds, white with red flecks when in dry state. Seeds
elliptic, 2, 5-2, 7 x 1 ,7-1,8 mm, dark chestnut or khaki,
covered in large black blotches and stripes with small
speckles in between; hilum exserted. Figure 1 .
Indigofera gifbergensis is restricted to mountainous
regions from Kobe Pass in the north to Cedarberg Sneeu-
kop in the south (Figure 2).
This mountain fynbos endemic flowers from late
August to November. It occurs between 600-1 650 m.
CAPE. — 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): Gifberg (-DC), 10.1953, Esterhuy-
sen 22084 (BOL); 9. 1948, Acocks 12891 (K); 8. 1948, Compton 20838
(NBG, STE); just before bridge over Snorkfontein River (-DC),
2.1979, Snijman 101 (MO, NBG, PRE); summit of Kobe Pass (— DB),
10.1973, Hall 4158 (NBG, PRE, STE). 3119 (Calvinia): Lokenberg,
WSW of Calvinia (-CA), 8.1953, Acocks 16882 (PRE). 3218 (Clan-
william): Langberg (-BA), 12.1951, Bond 1393 (NBG); 12.1941,
Esterhuysen 7335 (BOL); Pilaarsberg, north of Pakhuis Pass (-BB),
9.1967, Kerfoot 5922 (NBG). 3219 (Wuppertal): Heuningvlei Forest
FIGURE 1. — Indigofera gifbergen-
sis 1, flower, x 5,5; 2, calyx
opened out, x 6,8; 3, standard
opened out, x 8,2; 4, inner face
of wing petal, x 8,2; 5, outer
face of keel petal showing posi-
tion and shape of the peg, x
8,2; 6, androecium flattened
out, x 8,2; 7, pistil, x 8,2; 8,
fruit with section cut away to
show seeds and septa, x 2; 9,
seed, x 6, 8. 1-7: Kerfoot 5922.
8-9: Leipoldt 3366.
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
3
1500m
FIGURE 2. — Distribution of Indigofera gifbergensis, ▼ ; I.filifolia, • in southern Africa.
Station along road to Groenberg (-AA), 10.1967, Emdon 143 (PRE,
STE); Pakhuis Mountain (-AA), 12.1940, Leipoldt 3366 (BOL);
1 1 . 1929, Thode A2112 (PRE); 9. 1940, Compton 9598 (NBG); 9. 1937,
Compton 6939 (NGB); 12.1981, Stirton 10196 (STE); Sneeukop,
Cedarberg (-CD), 2.1936, Compton 6207 (NBG). Without precise
locality: 8.1936, Thorne s.n (SAM 52691).
This distinctive species is easily separated from I. fili-
folia and /. ionii by its stiff compact habit, small brick-
red flowers, the absence of tufts on anthers and its
blotched seeds.
2. Indigofera ionii J. K. Jarvie & C. H. Stirton,
sp. nov. subsectioni Juncifolieae Gillettii proxima. /.
filifoliae Thunb. et I. gifbergensis C. H. Stirton & J. K.
Jarvie affinis sed ab ambabus habitu humiliore, semini-
bus olivaceis, leguminibus compressis, sacculo carinae
deorsum curvato, differt.
Herba perennis decumbens usque 0,8 m alta. Stipulae
liberae ad caulem appressae, glabrae. Folia juventute
praesentia, imparipinnata, petiolata. Foliola anguste
obovata, 3 (4 vel 5), 8-10 x 3-5 mm, lateralia minora,
basi obtusa, apice mucronata, supra glabra, subtus
sparse aequaliter pubescentia. Petioli 15-25 mm longi.
Inflorescentiae axillares, 6- 10-florae, racemosae, laxae,
40-70 (80) mm longae. Flores 5-6 (7) mm longi, uno-
quoque bractea caduca anguste triangulari 2,5-3 ,0 mm
longa subtenti; pedicellus filiformis, 2-3,5 mm longus.
Calyx 3, 0-3, 5 mm longus; tubus 1,5-1 ,6 mm longus,
glaber, dentibus 1,5 mm longis, ± aequalibus, triangula-
ribus. Vexillum 5-7,0 mm longum et latum, transverse
late ovatum; auriculae et calli absentes. Alae 6,8-7 ,0 x
2,5 mm, margine inferiore involutae; extremitas infera
laminae incisa. Petala carinae 6,5-7 ,0 x 2, 0-2, 5 mm,
apice pubescentia. Androecium 6, 0-6, 5 mm longum;
stamine vexillari libero; antherae uniformes, <0,5 mm
longae, ovatae, apiculatae, squamis basalibus praesenti-
bus; filamenta antherarum basifixarum longa, tenuia;
filamenta antherarum medifixarum, breviora, crassiora.
Pistillum 5-6 mm longum, compressum, anguste ob-
longum, 8-ovulatum. Fructus 3, 0-3, 5 mm longus, com-
pressus, dehiscens; septa <1 mm longa. Semina ob-
longa, 2-3 x 2 mm, olivacea.
TYPE. — Cape, Vogelgat, nearHermanus,/. Williams
3519 (K,holo.!; NBG, iso.!).
Small wiry erect or sprawling herb up to 0,8 m tall;
sparsely branched, mostly near the base. Stipules free,
2,5-3 ,0 mm long, appressed to stem, glabrous. Leaves
present during early stages of growth, imparipinnate,
petiolate. Leaflets 3, occasionally 4 or 5, narrowly obo-
vate, 8-10 x 3-5 mm; terminal largest; base obtuse,
apex mucronate, straight, glabrous above, sparsely and
evenly scattered with biramous hairs beneath. Petiole
1 5—25 mm long; petiolule < 1 mm long. Inflorescences
axillary, 6-10-flowered, racemose, lax, 40-70 (-80)
mm long. Flowers 5-6 (7) mm long, each subtended by
a 2,5-3 ,0 mm long, narrowly triangular caducous bract;
pedicel filiform, 2, 0-3, 5 mm long, elongating and thick-
ening during fruit formation. Calyx 3, 0-3, 5 mm long,
glabrous; tube 1,5-1, 6 mm long; teeth 1,5 mm long,
more or less equal, triangular; sinus between vexillar
teeth broad. Standard 5, 0-7,0 mm long and wide, very
broadly ovate, claw very short, venation fine, branched
from three traces at base, apex slightly emarginate;
auricles and appendages absent. Wing petals 6, 8-7,0 x
2,5 mm, infolded along lower margin; auricle inflated
and flattened; with scattered hairs along the margin to-
4
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
FIGURE 3. — Indigofera ionii. 1,
calyx opened out, x 6,6; 2,
standard opened out, x 8; 3,
inner face of wing petal, X 8; 4,
outer face of keel petal showing
position and shape of the peg, x
8; 5, androecium flattened out,
X 8; 6, pistil, X 8; 7, fruit with
section cut away to show seeds
and septa, x 1,3; 8, septum, x
10; 9, seeds, LHS seed from
ends of the fruit and RHS seed
from the centre of the fruit, x
8,6. Voucher: Williams 3519.
wards the apex; lower end of blade notched. Keel petals
6,5-7 ,0 x 2,0-2, 5 mm, apex pubescent. Androecium
6, 0-6, 5 mm long; vexillar stamen free; anthers uniform,
< 0,5 mm long, ovate, apiculate, tufted at base; basi-
fixed anthers on long thin filaments; medifixed anthers
on short stout filaments. Pistil 5-6 mm long, com-
pressed, <0,5 mm long, glabrous, straight, narrowly
oblong, 8-ovuled; style upcurved, height of curvature
1,5 mm. Fruit 30-35 mm long, compressed, surface
coarsely rippled, margins distinctly ribbed, dehiscent;
septa < 1 mm long, white with small orange flecks.
Seeds oblong, 2-3 x 2 mm, olive-green. Figure 3.
Indigofera ionii is restricted to the mountains of the
south-western Cape (Figure 4). This fugitive fynbos
species favours damp areas, usually on tussocks in river
beds, vleis and marshes. It flowers sporadically from
August to April, with peaks between September and Jan-
uary. It occurs from 500-700 m.
CAPE. — 3418 (Simonstown): plateau between Constantiaberg and
Noordhoek (-AB), Levyns 6848 (BOL); west of Grootkop (-AB),
1.1940, Salter 8305 (BOL); Noordhoek Mountain (-AB), 11.1942,
Barker 2091 (NBG); marsh west of Klaasjagersberg (-AB); 1.1936,
Salter 5751 (BOL, BM, NBG); 8.1938, Salter 7606 (BM); Constantia-
berg (-AB), 3.1940, Bond 192 (NBG); 9.1922, Schlechter 1469
(BOL); 12.1943, Compton 15463 (NBG); Redhill (-AB), 1.1940, Le-
wis 709 (NBG); source of Prinskasteel River (-AB), 1.1948, Salter
8302 (BOL); stream south of Constantiaberg (-AB), 1 1 . 1896, Wolley-
Dod 1914 (K); Cape Point (-AD), 8.1944, Compton 15833 (NBG);
near Smitswinkel (-AD), Levyns 6850 (BOL); Compton s.n. (BOL);
Booiskraal near Brightwater, Cape of Good Hope Nature Reserve
(-AD), 12.1981, Grobbelaar 2647 (PRE); beacon near Smith’s farm
(-AD), 11.1939, Salter 8279 (BOL); Modderdam (-BA), 12.1938,
Salter 7874 (BM, BOL, PRE); 12.1938, Salter 7875 (BOL); Muizen-
berg Mountain (-BB), 12.1948, Compton 21210 (NBG); Rooi Els
Flats (-BD), 1 1 . 1945, Leighton 1448 (BOL); flats south west of Klein
Hangklip (-BD), 9.1969, Boucher 566 (STE); near Somersfontein
(-BD), 9.1969, Boucher 711 (STE). 3419 (Caledon): flats near Klein-
mond (-AC), De Vos 855 (STE); Palmiet Valley near Albertyn’s house
(-AC), 10.1948, De Vos 1045 (STE); Vogelpool, Vogelgat, near Her-
manus (-AD), 3.1984, Williams 3543 (K, NBG); Williams 3519 (K,
NBG); 9.1984, Stirton 10762 (K); marshy slopes at head of Boskloof
between Steenbras and Kogelberg (-BD), 2.1975. Esterhuysen s.n.
(BOL). Without precise locality: Forbes s.n. (K).
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
5
3. Indigofera fllifolia Thunb., Prodromus planta-
rum capensium: 132 (1800); Thunb.: 595 (1823). Type:
Cape, ‘in collibus infra Tafelberg latere orientali’, Thun-
berg s.n. (UPS-Thunb. 17338, holo., seen on micro-
fiche).
Lebeckia contaminata Ker: 104 (1816) non Thunb. (1800). L. con-
taminata Ait.f. : 261 (1812) non Willd. (1803). Indigofera filifolia Ker:
notes 2 (1817). Spartium contaminatum Ait.: 10 (1789) non L. (1771).
Type: Cape of Good Hope, Masson s.n. (BM!, holo.!).
Lebeckia nuda Sims: t. 2214 (1821). Indigofera nuda (Sims) G.
Don: 301 (1850); G. Don: 209 (1832). Type: Anonymous s.n. Raised
from Cape seeds in 1814 by Messrs. Whitley, Brame & Milne at the
Fulham Nursery and then sent to Sims in October 1819 as Lebeckia
contaminata (BM, holo.!).
Indigofera aphylla Breit. ex Link: 251 (1822); Breit.: 209 (1817).
Type: ‘Kap der guten Hoffnung (Cape of Good Hope), cultivated in the
Breiter Gardens in Leipzig and later by Link in Berlin, collector un-
known (B, holo., destroyed).
Indigofera juncea DC.: 225 (1825); Mordant de Launay: 227, t. 227
(1820); Drapiez: 452, t. 452 (1834). Type: cultivated from seed sent
from England, 24 Jul. 1818, Cels s.n. (G, holo.!). Figure 5.
FIGURE 5. — Painting of Indigofera juncea DC. (Cels s.n.) = I. filifo-
lia.
Tree-like shrub up to 2 m tall, open habit, woody;
branches sparsely appressed strigulose when young but
glabrous when mature. Stipules free, filiform, strigulose,
up to 2 mm long, parallel to axis of branch. Leaves
common on younger plants, petiolate, basal pair largest,
upper pairs being reduced to scales. Basal leaflets 6-8,
elliptic, rarely narrowly obovate, 15-20 x 8-10 mm;
base cuneate; apex mucronate, straight; glabrous above,
sparsely and evenly scattered with appressed biramous
hairs beneath. Petiole 40-60 mm long; petiolules up to 2
mm long. Inflorescences axillary, clustered at ends of
branches forming a pseudocompound structure, race-
mose, lax, up to 50-flowered. Flowers (7,5) 8,0-10,5
mm long, each subtended by a short 1-2 mm long, nar-
rowly triangular, rapidly caducous bract; pedicel 4, 0-4, 3
mm long. Calyx 4, 0-4, 5 mm long; tube 1,7-3 ,4 mm
long; teeth unequal, 1, 1-3,0 mm long; triangular sinus
between vexillar pair very broad, hairs few, scattered in
the sinuses of the teeth. Standard (6,1) 8, 4-9, 2 (10,2) x
(5) 6, 3-7, 6 mm, orbicular; claw very short; venation
fine, branching from three traces at the base; apex
slightly hooded, auricles and appendages absent. Wing
petals 9-10 X 2, 5-3,0 mm, constricted in the middle;
auricle inflated and flattened. Keel petals 9 x 3, 0-3, 5
mm; apex pubescent. Androecium 9-10 mm long; vexil-
lar stamen free; anthers uniform, 1 mm long, apiculate
and tufted, anthers on long filaments basifixed, those on
short filaments dorsifixed; scales present. Pistil 6, 6-9,0
(9,9) mm long, terete, < 0,5 mm wide, glabrous,
arched, narrowly oblong, 8-14-ovuled; style upcurved,
height of curvature 2 mm. Fruit 40-55 x 4 mm, dark
brown, dehiscent. Seeds 2, 6-2, 7 mm long and wide,
chocolate-brown, hilum protruding, transversely oblong.
Figure 6.
Indigofera filifolia is a widespread fynbos endemic
occurring from the Cape Peninsula eastwards to Heidel-
berg (Figure 2). It favours damp sites and is especially
common along watercourses. The plants flower through-
out the year but with a peak from February to March.
This species coppices strongly after bums.
CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): valley behind Table Mountain (-CD),
February, Smuts 1083 (PRE); 3.1920, Andreae 296 (STE); north of
Window stream (-CD), 4.1956, Esterhuysen 25652 (BOL, MO); St
James, Cape Peninsula (-CD), 4.1914, St. Clair Capron s.n. (PRE);
summit of Table Mountain (-CD), 3.1899, Schoenberg 4867 (PRE);
3.1922, Wilson 130 (STE); 3.1917, Page s.n. (PRE); 4.1907, Kensit
68 (PRE); 2. 1929, Gillett3527 (STE); Kensit 68 (PRE); Prior s.n. (K);
4.1881, Bolus 4778 (K, BM, BOL); 3.1947, Barker 4445 (NBG);
3.1952, Salter s.n. (STE); 3.1910, Worsdell s.n. (K); 4.1929, Hut-
chinson & Smuts 3190 (BM, K); Rondebosch (-CD), July, Drege s.n.
(K). 3319 (Worcester): Franschhoek Pass (-CC), 3.1934, Smuts &
Gillett s.n. (STE). 3320 (Montagu): Swellendam Forest Reserve
(-CD), 1.1969, Marsh 1110 (STE); below 12 o’clock Peak (-CD),
5.1963, Taylor 4752 (PRE, STE); Barrydale Pass (-DC), Van Breda
1518 (K, PRE); Tradouw Pass (-DC), 3.1954, Balfour Browne 18
(BM). 3321 (Ladismith): Garcias Pass (-CC), 4.1935, Esterhuysen
32484 (BOL); Van Breda 1101 (K); 11.1814, Burchell 6974 (K).3322
(Oudtshoom): Montagu Pass (-CD), 2.1944, Fourcade 6367 (STE);
12.1949, Martin 76 (NBG); 6.1927, Fourcade 3245 (STE. PRE);
1 .1897, Guthrie s.n. (NBG); lower Montagu Pass, between Toll House
and bridge, 6.1943, Fourcade 6020 (STE); on Postberg near George
(-CD), 8.1814, Burchell 5952 (K, BOL, PRE); 7.1912, Rogers 4321
(BOL); Prior s.n. (K); 3.1928, Maude s.n. (K). 3323 (Willowmore):
Coldstream (-DC), Galpin 9565 (K). 3418 (Simonstown): Orange
Kloof River (-AB), 2.1896, Wolley-Dod 820 (BOL); 5.1953; Salter
9558 (BM, MO); above Kalk Bay (-AB), 3.1896, Wolley-Dod 1007
BM, BOL); 4.1974, Goldblatt 1399 (MO, PRE); Constantia Valley
(-AB), 4. 1886, Thode 9 (PRE); 1 1 . 1938, Salter 7852 (BOL); 3.1939.
Salter 8032 (BOL); Silvermine Plateau (-AB), 4.1974, Goldblatt 1585
(MO, NBG, PRE); 3.1932, Salter 2059 (BM, BOL); 3.1936, Salter
5947 (BM); Simonstown (-AB), 5.1884, Marloth 94 (PRE); 3.1935,
Minicki s.n. (NBG); 3.1918, Pillans 3488 (PRE); 8.1865, Wright s.n.
(K); Hout Bay (-AB), Prior s.n. (K); 4. 1955, Baker 657 (BM. NBG);
Blaauberg (-AB), Drege s.n (K); Schusters Kraal (-AB), 3.1941,
Penfold s.n. (NBG); flats at Smitswinkel vlei (-AD), 2.1961, Thomas
s.n. (STE); Boys Kraal Rivier Vlei (-AD), 3.1946, Compton 17940
(NBG); Bettys Bay (-BD), 3.1972, Vogts s.n. (STE); Palmiet Kloof,
east of bridge (-BD), 3.1948, De Vos 1299 (STE); 7.1950, Parker
4491 (BOL, K, NBG); 7.1975, Stirton 5013 (PRE); Ebersohn 243
(NBG); Palmiet River Mountains (-BD), 1.1947, Stokoe s.n. (NBG);
Rooi Els (-BD), 3.1948, Parker 4319 (BOL. K. NBG); Elephant Rock
Mountain (-BD), 3.1971, Boucher 1464 (K, PRE, STE); Platbos Pass
(-BD), March, Boucher 1176 (K, PRE, SRGH, STE). 3419 (Caledon):
Elgin (-AA), 4.1946, Stokoe s.n. (SAM 59572); Nuwekloof, Houw-
hoek Mountains (-AA), 3. 1815. Burchell 8052, 8134 (K); on the sides
of the Bot River, near Houwhoek (-AA), Bowes s.n. (BM); Swartberg
Mountain near Caledon (-AB), 9.1904, Bolus s.n. (BOL); Palmietberg
(-AC), 3.1983, Van Wyk 1142 (PRE); Hermanus (-AC), 4.1949, De
6
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
FIGURE 6. — Indigofera filifolia. 1,
calyx opened out, X 6,8; 2,
standard opened out, x 8,2; 3,
inner face of wing petal, X 8,2;
4, outer face of keel petal show-
ing position and shape of the
peg, x 8,2; 5, androecium flat-
tened out, x 8,2; 6, pistil, x
8,2; 7, fruit with section cut
away to show seeds and septa,
x 1,7; 8, septum, x 6,8; 9,
seed, x 6,8. Voucher: Williams
3542.
Waal s.n. (BOL, NBG); 4.1946, Compton 17963 (BOL, NBG);
4.1980, Orchard 545 (K, MO, PRE, STE); Cascade Pool, Vogelgat
(-AD), 4.1984, Williams 3542 (K); Sues Pool, Vogelgat (-AD),
4.1979, Williams 2739 (MO, NBG, PRE); Vogelkloof, 4. 1950, Martin
322 (STE); Maanschijnkop (-AD), 4.1978, Williams 2465 (MO,
NBG); Babylon’s Tower (-AD), 2.1941, Esterhuysen 4974 (BOL);
near Stanford, foot of Kleinrivier Mountains (-AD), 4.1952, Stokoe
s.n. (NGB, STE); Boesmanskloof (-BA), 4.1983, Forsyth 24 (PRE);
Genadendal, Baviaanskloof (-BA), 3.1933, Gillett 840 (BOL, STE);
Riviersonderend (-BB), 4.1950, Middlemost 1534 (NBG); Wynand
Louw’s Bos (-BD), 3.1963, Van der Merwe 1357 (PRE, STE); Koude-
bergkloof near Nuwepos (-DA), 4.1975, Oliver 5845 (PRE, STE).
3420 (Bredasdorp): Swellendam Mountain (-AB), 2.1941, Compton
10600 (NBG); 4.1926, Smith 2720 (PRE); 3.1930, Thode 2318 (K);
1.1815, Burchell 7401 (K); Hermitage Kloof (-AD), 12.1958, Stokoe
s.n. (NBG). 3421 (Riversdale): Lemoenshoek Mountain near Heidel-
berg (-AA), 3.1948, Stokoe s.n. (SAM 61559). Without precise local-
ity: Cape, Harvey, s.n. (BM, K); Cape Flats, February, Ecklon &
Zeyher s.n. (SAM 32330); Bowie s.n. (BM); Langeberg Mountains,
4. 1923, Muir 2528 (PRE).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank the following: the curators
and staff of BM, BOL, K, MO, NBG, PRE and STE for
their help and loan of much valuable material; Dr B. V.
Verdcourt and Miss M. Wilmot-Dear for kindly provid-
ing the Latin translations; Dr Ion Williams for his hospi-
tality and kindness to the second author and for his accu-
rate field notes and comprehensive collections of /. ionii.
Finally the first author would like to thank Drs Barbara
Pickersgill, J. Barnett and R. Wadsworth (Reading Uni-
versity); Dr I. C. Trueman (Wolverhampton Polytech-
nic); Brenda Timmons, Chloe Bennett and Lani Rubin
for help and advice.
REFERENCES
AITON, W. 1789. Spartium contaminatum. Hortus kewensis 3: 10.
AITON, W. T. 1812. Lebeckia contaminata. Hortus kewensis 4: 261 .
BAKER, E. G. 1905. Report on some South African species of Indigo-
fera in the Albany Museum Herbarium. Record of the Albany
Museum 1: 279-281.
BREITER, C. A. 1817. Indigofera aphylla. Hortus breiterianus: 209.
Leipzig.
BREMEKAMP, C. E. B. 1932. New or otherwise noteworthy plants
from the northern Transvaal. Annals of the Transvaal Museum 15:
233-264.
BROWN, N. E. 1925. New species of Indigofera from the Transvaal
and Swaziland. Kew Bulletin 1925: 142-159.
BROWN, N. E. 1926. Indigofera. In J. B. Burtt Davy, Manual of
flowering plants and ferns, Transvaal 2: 44-^15.
DE CANDOLLE, A. P. 1825. Indigofera juncea. Prodromus systema-
tis 2: 225. Paris.
DE KORT, I. & THUSSE, G. 1984. A revision of the genus Indigo-
fera (Leguminosae — Papilionoideae) in south-east Asia. Blumea
30: 89-151.
DENTER, K. 1932. Diagnosen neuer sudwestafrikanischer Pflanzen.
Feddes Repertorium 30: 198.
DON, G. 1832. Indigofera nuda. A general system of gardening and
botany 2: 209. London.
DON, G. 1850. Indigofera nuda. In J. C. Loudon, Hortus britannicus :
301. London.
DRAPEEZ, P. A. J. 1834. Indigofera juncea. Herbier de T Amateur de
Fleurs 7: 452. t. 452.
DYER, R. A. 1944. Indigofera burkeana. Flowering Plants of South
Africa: 939.
FOURCADE, H. G. 1932. Contributions to the flora of the Knysna
and neighbouring divisions. Transactions of the Royal Society of
South Africa 21: 75-102.
GILLETT, J. B. 1958. Indigofera (Michrocharis) in tropical Africa
with the related genera Cyamopsis and Rhynchotropis . Kew Bulle-
tin, Additional Series 1: 1-166.
GUTHRIE, L., PILLANS, N. S. & SALTER, T. M. 1939. Plantae
novae Africanae. Journal of South African Botany 5: 66-73.
HARVEY, W. H. 1862. Leguminosae. In W. H. Harvey & O. W.
Sonder, Flora capensis 2: 163-203. Reeve, London.
KER, J. B. 1816. Lebeckia contaminata. Botanical Register 2: 104.
KER, J. B. 1817. Indigofera filifolia. Botanical Register 3: notes 2.
LINK, H. F. 1822. Indigofera aphylla. Enumeratio plantarum horti
regii bot. berolinensis 2: 251. Berol.
MERXMULLER, H. & SCHREIBER, A. 1957. Einige neue Legumi-
nosen aus Siidwestafrika. Bulletin du Jardin botanique de L’Etat,
a Bruxelles 27: 269-274.
MORDANT DE LAUNAY, J. C. M. & LOISELEUR-DESLON-
CHAMPS, J. L. A. 1820. Indigofera juncea. Herbier General de
I’ Amateur 4: 227 , t. 227. Paris.
POLHILL, R. M. 1981. Indigofereae (Benth.) Rydb. In R. M. Polhill
& P. H. Raven, Advances in legume systematics: 289-291. Royal
Botanic Gardens, Kew.
SCHREIBER, A. 1970. Einige neue Fabaceen aus Siidwestafrika. Mit-
teilungen aus der Botanischen Staatssammlung Munchen 8:
137-145.
SIMS, J. 1821 . Lebeckia nuda. Curtis’s Botanical Magazine: t. 2214.
STIRTON, C. H. 1982. A new species of Indigofera from the south-
west Cape. Bothalia 14: 69-82.
SUESSENGUTH, K. & MERXMULLER, H. 1951. Species et varie-
tates novae vel rarae in Africa australi et centrali lectae. Mittei-
lungen aus der Botanischen Staatssammlung Munchen 3: 89.
THUNBERG, C. P. 1800. Indigofera filifolia. Prodromus plantarum
capensium. 2: 132.
THUNBERG, C. P. 1823. Indigofera filifolia. Flora capensis, edn 2.
Copenhagen.
Bothalia 17,1:7-15 (1987)
A synopsis of Tephrosia subgenus Barbistyla( Fabaceae) in southern
Africa
B. D. SCHRIRE*
Keywords: Fabaceae, key, Millettieae, new combinations, new species, Papilionoideae, southern Africa, subgenus Barbistyla, synopsis,
Tephrosia, T. brummittii
ABSTRACT
A synopsis of the southern African species of Tephrosia Pers. subgenus Barbistyla Brummitt is given. Twenty-one
species are recognized. A new species, T. brummittii B. D. Schrire, is described and six new combinations are presented.
The key is partly descriptive to provide diagnoses of the taxa and includes information on distributions. Vouchers are noted
from at least three different herbaria to aid identification. Detailed notes are provided on atypical collections and taxa that
require further investigation. Typification has been done as far as necessary to ensure that the names used are correct.
UITTREKSEL
’n Samevatting van die suider-Afrikaanse spesies van Tephrosia subgenus Barbistyla Brummitt word gegee. Een-en-
twintig spesies word erken. ’n Nuwe spesie, T. brummittii B. D. Schrire, word beskryf en ses nuwe kombinasies word
voorgestel. Die sleutel is gedeeltelik beskrywend om diagnoses van die taksons te verskaf en bevat inligting oor versprei-
ding. Kontrole-eksemplare is van ten minste drie herbaria aangeteken om identifikasie te vergemaklik. Gedetailleerde notas
word verskaf oor atipiese versamelings en oor taksons wat verdere ondersoeke vereis. Tipifikasie is gedoen sover dit nodig
was om seker te maak dat die name wat gebruik is, korrek is.
INTRODUCTION
Tephrosia is a pantropical genus in the tribe Millet-
tieae (Papilionoideae) comprising over 400 species
mostly from Africa. An overview of the nomenclatural
history, systematic position, taxonomy and morphology
of the genus is given by Bosman & De Haas (1983) and
the most recent reviews of the tribe are by Geesink
(1981, 1984).
In the Flora of southern Africa region it is estimated
that there are 52 species eight subspecies and 10 varie-
ties. There are at least three interspecific hybrids with the
likelihood of more being found in the future.
My treatment of the genera closely allied to Tephrosia
follows that by Brummitt (1980), i.e. Requienia and
Ptycholobium are retained as separate genera whereas
Lupinophyllum is sunk in Tephrosia.
Despite recent criticism by Geesink (1984) there is
good reason for retaining the two subgeneric divisions in
Tephrosia (Brummitt 1980). Although precise characters
such as arrangement and position of hairs either along
the style or just below the stigma, or the degree of style
twisting, are variable, the two subgenera are character-
ized by flowers with different pollination strategies.
The salient features of each subgenus are summarized
in the key below.
In subgenus Barbistyla, 21 species are recognized; a
number of H.M.L. Forbes’s (1948) species are reduced
to synonomy or to subspecific status. The subgenus has a
high degree of endemism in southern Africa with the T.
natalensis, T. macropoda, T. albissima and T. grandi-
flora complexes almost all radiating exclusively within
the Flora of southern Africa area. The three latter groups
appear to be closely related to one another. It is however
only these species in the subgenus that are endemic to us.
The T. longipes complex and some of the other isolated
species are more tropical in origin and they represent
southerly extensions into the FSA area. A number of
other areas of diversity for the subgenus occur in tropical
Africa.
Selection pressures for evolutionary divergence at the
generic level appear to have been centred on the breeding
system. The subgeneric categories have different flower
structures and this is reflected in their different polli-
nation strategies. Within the subgenus Barbistyla, inflo-
rescence characters (bracts) and fruit characters (pod size
and seed position) separate the T. grandiflora allies from
those of T. longipes. Inflorescence specialization has
been particularly marked in the T. grandiflora alliance.
Flowers (4-) 6-13 (-18) mm long (from calyx across the keel), orange or pink; wings and keel distally curving up-
wards (the keel often appearing L-shaped); standard somewhat folded over the keel basally and curving upwards
with the distal half reflexed; style glabrous, with or without a tuft of hairs just below the stigma .... subgenus Tephrosia
Flowers (1 1— ) 14-24 (-30) mm long (from calyx across the keel), pink or mauve; wings and
keel forwardly directed, obtriangular; standard generally straight, either folded over the keel or fully reflexed
away from it; style pubescent, with or without a tuft of hairs just below the stigma subgenus Barbistyla
* Botanical Research Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001. Pre-
sently: South African Liaison Officer, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew,
Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, England, UK.
8
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
An interpretation of the above might be that in the
early stages of the evolution of Tephrosia the floral char-
acters were fairly labile, and only after the build up of
various constraints, did two major alternative strategies
become dominant. The multifunctional-structural flower
had now become constrained by the accumulated adapt-
ions and interactions (burden) that made it successful.
This became a fixed feature around which the other parts
of the breeding system could interact. Further selection
could be channelled in either of two directions: speciali-
zation in the ovules and ovary and ultimately fruit and
seed dispersal, or specialization in inflorescences acting
on floral development, presentation and protection.
Further examination of these hypotheses could add to
our knowledge of the radiation and interrelationships
within the genus Tephrosia as a whole.
This synopsis is a preliminary account of the subgenus
Barbistyla aimed at providing names and a means of
identification for a difficult and variable group of plants.
Hybridization is so far only known from isolated cases in
disturbed areas, between closely related species.
The genus appears to comprise a number of actively
evolving complexes in which peripheral variation is dif-
ficult to assess, and much of the underlying genetic va-
riation is not readily quantifiable in morphological
terms. A full revision of the genus for the Flora of
southern Africa is in preparation.
KEY TO SPECIES
(Note: 1: b = length/breadth)
la Stipules and flower bracts triangular to narrowly triangular or subulate, ± of equal size, stipules never
auriculate at the base or with reflexed margins:
2a Slender, procumbent to erect perennial herbs with many flexuous stems; leaflets 9-13, very narrowly
elliptic to narrowly oblanceolate or oblong, 6-25 (28) mm long, often discolorous; pseudoracemes laxly
flowered; pods linear, 35-55 mm long; seeds 6-9; from E Transvaal and Swaziland 1 T. retusa
2b Robust, decumbent to erect suffrutices, subshrubs or annuals:
3a Pseudoracemes compact and densely congested, on short peduncles 2-30 (-40) mm long, inflorescences
often but not always more or less exceeded by the leaves; pods grey to brown villous:
4a Leaves ( 1— )3— <— 5)-foliolate , stipules narrowly triangular; leaflets abaxially grey sericeous; from SWA/
Namibia and Botswana 2.T. cephalantha var. decumbens
4b Leaves (6-) 7-10 (— 1 1 )-foliolate, stipules triangular; leaflets abaxially appressed pubescent not
sericeous; from NE Transvaal 3. T. aequalata subsp. australis
3b Pseudoracemes elongated and laxly flowered, up to 300 mm long excluding the peduncle or, if ±
congested, then at the ends of peduncles raised well above the leaves; pods glabrous to thinly
pubescent:
5a Robust herbaceous-stemmed suffrutices or annuals; pods linear, l:b ± 12:1; seeds orbicular or with
longer dimension along the longitudinal axis of the pod:
6a Leaflets linear to linear-elliptic, l:b ± 12:1 with acuminate apices: leaflets in 1-7 (8) pairs, (20-)
30-100 (— 120)X( 1— ) 2-7 (-14) mm; widespread in S Botswana, Transvaal, OFS, Natal and
N Cape 4. T. longipes
6b Leaflet shape other than above, l:b ± 6: 1 or less with acute, rounded, truncate or emarginate apices:
7a Youngest foliage densely white or yellowish pubescent and conspicuously dark mucronate;
from SWA/Namibia, N Botswana, N and NE Transvaal:
8a Leaflets narrowly to very nanowly elliptic with acute apices, (8-) 15-35 (-45) X (2-) 3-7 (-12)
mm; pods with 10-12 seeds; from N Transvaal 5. T. euchroa
8b Leaflets elliptic-oblong, oblanceolate or narrowly oblong with rounded, truncate or emarginate
apices, (10—) 35-60 (-80) X 7-12 (-15) mm; pods with 12-16 seeds; from SWA/Namibia,
N Botswana and NE Transvaal:
9a Stems with conspicuous spreading brown to grey hairs up to 2,5 mm long:
10a Annual slender herb with a long thin taproot; stems not strongly decumbent; leaves few in
number, restricted to the lower part of the plant; leaflets in 1-4 (5) pairs; from
N Botswana 6. T. euprepes
10b Perennial with woody rootstock or, if annual then with robust, strongly decumbent stems;
leaflets in 4-9 pairs:
11a Stems erect, conspicuously long brown pilose; petiole and rhachis together
(90—) 120-180 (-200) mm long; calyx with long spreading hairs; from
N Botswana 7a. T. caerulea subsp. caerulea
lib Stems usually decumbent, to 1 m or more long, rarely erect; moderately to densely
yellowish or grey pilose; petiole and rhachis together 40-1 10 (-120) mm long; calyx
shortly pubescent; from NE Transvaal 8. T. reptans var. reptans
9b Stems with appressed or ascending grey hairs; from SWA/Namibia, N Botswana
7b. 7". caerulea subsp. otaviensis
7b Youngest foliage conspicuously dark brown in dried material and essentially glabrous or sparsely to
moderately long pilose; from Natal midlands, N Natal, adjacent S Transvaal and Swazi-
land:
12a Pseudoracemes elongated with at least three distinct flowering nodes along the rhachis; calyx
teeth lanceolate to linear, equal to or longer than the tube; from Howick and Pietermaritzburg
Districts of Natal midlands, Utrecht to Paulpietersburg Districts of N Natal, adjacent
S Transvaal and Swaziland 9a. T. natalensis subsp. natalensis
12b Pseudoracemes in pseudoheads at the ends of the peduncles, with only one or rarely two
flowering nodes; calyx teeth triangular, shorter than the tube; from the Muden-Greytown-
Kranskop Districts of Natal midlands 9b. T. natalensis subsp. pseudocapitata
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
9
5b Erect woody-stemmed subshrubs; pods narrowly oblong to lorate, l:b ±6:1; seeds transversely elongate
with the longer dimension across the width of the pod:
13a Young stems canescent; stipules linear; pseudoracemes from short peduncles, elongate and laxly
flowered; from E Swaziland 14.7. gobensis
13b Young stems sparsely to moderately pubescent; stipules narrowly triangular to lanceolate;
pseudoracemes in pseudoheads at the ends of the peduncles; from E Transvaal, Natal to
Transkei 21. 7. shiluwanensis
lb Stipules and flower bracts ovate to lanceolate, if stipules narrow then either auriculate at the base and with
reflexed margins or somewhat narrower than the bracts:
14a Prostrate to ascending herbaceous plants with many slender stems arising from a woody rootstock; usually of
open grassland and sandy places:
15a Peduncles less than 30 mm long; pseudoracemes elongated and laxly flowered; leaflets characteris-
tically obtriangular to broadly obovate, up to 20 (-26) mm long; pods shortly oblong, (8-) 12-25 mm
long with a rounded apex; seeds 2—4 (5), not transversely elongated; prostrate mat-forming herb;
stems conspicuously spreading-pubescent; from N SWA/Namibia and N Transvaal 10.7. radicans
15b Peduncles longer than 30 mm; pseudoracemes with flowers often clustered at the ends of peduncles;
leaflets variously shaped, up to 65 mm long; pods lorate, (20—) 25-60 mm long with acute apices; seeds
more than 5, transversely elongated:
16a Buds completely enclosed by large, scarious navicular or trullate bracts 4-15 (-18) mm long
(sometimes not quite masking the buds in 7. bachmannii); pseudoracemes sparsely flowered with
only 1-3 (4) flowers open at any one time:
17a Calyx densely white to yellow sericeous; leaflets abaxially canescent or sericeous; endemic to
northern Pondoland/southem Natal sandstone region 15. 7. bachmannii
17b Calyx shortly pubescent to spreading pilose; leaflets not as above:
18a Stipules maturing brown to dark brown, dying back and curling away from the stems; leaves
3-7-foliolate; leaflets obovate to narrowly obovate, 20-65 x 6-30 mm; OR (which includes
var. diffusa) 5-9-foliolate with leaflets narrower, elliptic, 8-20 x 3-6 mm; widespread in the
eastern half of the FSA area 11.7. macropoda sensu lato
18b Stipules maturing conspicuously red or brown, closely appressed to the stems; leaves 7-11
(— 13)-foliolate; leaflets mostly narrowly oblong-elliptic or oblanceolate, (12-) 18-36 (—4-2) x
3-7 (-12) mm; from N Zululand and Swaziland Lowveld 12. 7. brummittii
16b Buds visible and only partially masked by trullate, ovate to narrowly lanceolate bracts (1) 2-5 (-8) mm
long; pseudoracemes compactly 2-8 (-lO)-flowered:
19a Leaves with petiole and leaf rhachis together longer than 25 mm (except occasionally in depauperate
upland forms from the Kokstad-Harding region of E Griqualand); leaves never sessile; from
Transkei to the Natal midlands 13a. 7. albissima subsp. albissima
19b Leaves with petiole and leaf rhachis together shorter than 25 mm; leaves often sessile and with very
reduced rhachides; from W Zululand and N Natal 13b. 7. albissima subsp. zuluensis
14b Erect or bushy subshrubs 0, 5-3,0 m high, with one to a few stems, woody at least at their bases; usually of
scrub or forest margins, but where these vegetation types are evidently disturbed then plants untidy and
scrambling:
20a Calyx shortly appressed white to yellowish sericeous; leaflets abaxially grey subsericeous to sericeous:
21a Leaflets very narrowly oblanceolate or, if broader than 40 mm then longer than 26 mm; bracts 1-10
(-12) mm long, about as long as wide, broadly ovate with rounded to acute apices, moderately to
densely white sericeous; endemic from the sandstone outcrop region of N Pondoland/S Natal
15. 7. bachmannii
21b Leaflets mostly shorter than 26 mm and wider than 40 mm; bracts (8-) 10-32 mm long, navicular or
narrowly ovate, longer than wide with narrowly acute, more often acuminate apices; from the coastal
belt of SW Cape to Natal south of Durban, inland to the Albany and Amatola regions of the
ECape 16. 7. grandiflora
20b Calyx white to rufous pubescent, spreading pilose or villous; leaflets abaxially glabrous to canescent:
22a Bracts exceeding and completely enclosing young buds and also often the undeveloped apices of the
pseudoracemes:
23a Stipules broadly ovate and conspicuously cordate at the base:
24a Compact, woody shrubs, largest stipules longer than 13 mm, characteristically chartaceous,
maturing to purple or maroon, crowded and overlapping on new growth; from the Lydenburg
and Barberton Districts of E Transvaal and Swaziland 19.7. cordata
24b Lax, short-lived perennials; largest stipules never longer than 13 mm, scarious, maturing reddish
to brown; from the NE, E and SE Transvaal and N Natal, W Zululand to the Natal
midlands 18b. 7. glomeruliflora subsp. meisneri
23b Stipules ovate, not cordate at the base, or narrowly ovate to lanceolate and auriculate at the base,
often with re flexed margins:
25a Bracts — (8-) 10—32 mm long, navicular or narrowly ovate, longer than wide with narrowly acute
or more often, acuminate apices:
26a Stipules broadly ovate, closely appressed to the stems; bracts sparsely to moderately puberulent;
from the coastal belt of SW Cape to Natal south of Durban, inland to the Albany and Amatola
regions of E Cape 16.7. grandiflora
26b Stipules narrowly lanceolate to subulate, often with reflexed margins and spreading
from the stem; bracts moderately to densely spreading pilose or villous; from the Eshowe to
Inanda Districts of Natal 17. 7. inandensis
25b Bracts 4-10 (-12) mm long, trullate, broadly ovate or orbicular, ± as long as wide with rounded,
broadly acute or apiculate apices:
10
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
27a Calyx teeth narrowly subulate, 4—7 mm long, significantly longer than the tube; from
the Barberton, Nelspruit and Komatipoort Districts of E Transvaal and Weza in
EGriqualand 20. T. subulata
27b Calyx teeth triangular, lanceolate or subulate, 1,0-3, 5 mm long, shorter than to slightly
exceeding the tube;
*28a Young inflorescences in dense glomerules at the ends of the peduncles; bracts flesh-
coloured, minutely puberulent with a ciliate margin or short and densely white pubescent;
calyx teeth triangular or appearing shortly subulate when dry, shorter than the tube except
for the lowest tooth:
29a Stems densely appressed pubescent, becoming glabrous only with age; bracts and calyces
moderately to densely white pubescent; from the coastal belt of Natal from Umzinto to N
Zululand and inland to the Boston District of the midlands in the south and to the
Hlabisa District in the north 18a. T. glomeruliflora subsp. glomeruliflora
29b Stems glabrous or only sparsely pubescent when young; bracts flesh-coloured, minutely-
puberulent with a ciliate margin; calyces sparsely to densely white to rufous pubescent or
pilose; from the NE, E and SE Transvaal and N Natal, W Zululand to the Natal midlands
18b. T. glomeruliflora subsp. meisneri
t28b Young inflorescences in dense pseudoheadsat the ends of the peduncles or pseudoracemes
up to 100 mm long; if appearing glomerule-like then bracts white to yellowish spreading
pilose; calyx teeth lanceolate-subulate, ± equal to the tube:
30a Youngest leaves densely spreading yellowish sericeous; bracts ovate-acuminate, (6) 7-12
mm long, densely white to yellowish pilose; from the Eshowe to Inanda Districts of Natal
17. T. inandensis
30b Youngest leaves densely appressed canescent; bracts ovate and apiculate, 4-7 mm long,
sparsely to moderately white pilose; from the Shilovane, Pilgrims Rest and Lydenburg
Districts of E Transvaal to N Natal, W Zululand and the Natal midlands from the Grey-
town through Pietermaritzburg to Harding Districts and the Transkei 21.7’. shiluwanensis
22b Bracts never completely exceeding or enclosing young buds and only partially obscuring them in the
pseudoracemes:
31a Calyx teeth broadly triangular, with acute apices, much shorter than the tube; bracts 1-3 mm long,
obovate or ovate with truncate or rounded to apiculate apices, shortly and densely white pubescent;
from the Boston and Durban Districts of Natal 18a. T. glomeruliflora subsp. glomeruliflora
31b Calyx teeth narrowly triangular to lanceolate or subulate with attenuate apices, ± equal to or exceed-
ing the tube:
32a Calyx teeth narrowly subulate, 4-7 mm long, significantly longer than the tube; from the Bar-
berton, Nelspruit and Komatipoort Districts of E Transvaal and Weza in E Griqualand .... 20. 7. subulata
32b Calyx teeth lanceolate or subulate, l,0-3,5(-4,0) mm long, more or less equal to the tube:
33a Youngest leaves densely appressed canescent; bracts 1-6 mm long, minutely puberulent to
sparsely pubescent; calyx lobes often maturing bristle-like and re flexed apically; from the
Shilovane, Pilgrims Rest and Lydenburg Districts of the E Transvaal to N Natal, W Zululand
and the Natal midlands from the Greytown through Pietermaritzburg to Harding Districts and
the Transkei 21.7'. shiluwanensis
33b Youngest leaves densely spreading yellowish sericeous; bracts (6-) 7-12 mm long, densely
white to yellowish pilose; calyx lobes not as above; from the Eshowe to Inanda Districts
of Natal 17. T. inandensis
SYNOPSIS OF SPECIES
1 . Tephrosia retusa Burn Davy, Flowering plants
and ferns of the Transvaal 2: xxxi + 378 (1932). Type:
Transvaal, Barberton, juxta Kaap River, Bolus 7724
(K!,BOL).
Distribution: E Transvaal and Swaziland.
Vouchers: Bolus 11821 (K, BOL); Elan-Puttick 254
(PRE); Liebenberg 3317 (K, PRE); Pott 5326 (PRE);
Rogers 24827 (K, PRE).
2. Tephrosia cephalantha Welw. ex Bak. var. de-
cumbens Welw. ex Bak. emend. Brummitt in Boletim da
* The term glomerule, used to describe certain juvenile inflorescences
in the key, refers to the spherical or globose body located at the ends of
peduncles which is formed by the compact arrangement of broadly
ovate to orbicular bracts with rounded, apiculate or broadly acute
apices.
t The term pseudoheads is used when inflorescences are congested at
the ends of the peduncles but either the bracts are too small to com-
pletely enclose the young buds or the apices project out from the inflo-
rescence because they are sharply acute to acuminate.
Sociedade Broteriana, ser. 2, 41: 384 (1968). Type: An-
gola, Hufla, Ferrao da Sola, Welwitsch 2090 (K!).
Distribution: SWA/Namibia and Botswana.
Vouchers: De Winter 2801 (K, PRE); De Winter &
Marais 4539 (K, PRE); Holub s.n. (K); Merxmiiller &
Giess 1864 (K); Smith 2311 (K).
3. Tephrosia aequalata Bak. subsp. australis
Brummitt in Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana, s6r. 2, 41:
358 (1968). Type: Zimbabwe, Melsetter Distr., Williams
146 (K, holo.!; PRE!, SRGH).
Distribution: NE Transvaal.
Vouchers: Codd 3040 (K, PRE); Hanekom 2283 (K,
PRE); Hemm 182 (K, PRE); Scheepers 341 (K, PRE);
Taylor 646 (K, PRE).
Note
This species was confused by H. M. L. Forbes: 990
(1948) with T. zombensis Bak.
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
11
4. Tephrosia longipes Meisn. in Hooker’s London
Journal of Botany 2: 87 (1843). Type: Natal, in gramino-
sis ad latera montium Tafelberge, Port Natal, Krauss 20
(K, holo.!).
4a. subsp. longipes.
Brummitt in Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana, ser 2
41:309(1968).
Tephrosia lurida Sond.: 30 (1850). Type: Transvaal, Moorivier,
Magaliesberg, Croccxlile River, Zeyher456 (K, isosyn. !).
Tephrosia angustissima Engl.: 29 (1888). Type: Cape, pr. Kuru-
man, in summo montium ‘Ga Mhana’ , Mar loth 1086 (B, BOL GRA
PRE!, SAM).
Distribution: widespread in S Botswana, Transvaal,
OFS, Natal and N Cape.
Vouchers: Brenan & Vahrmeijer 14255 (K); Codd
2661 (K, PRE); Germishuizen 133 (K, PRE); Rogers
18129 (K, PRE); Wood 1202 (K).
Notes
(1) The typical subsp. is maintained because of the
occurrence of subsp. swynnertonii (Bak. f.) Brummitt:
315 (1968) in eastern Zimbabwe.
(2) A great deal of confusion has arisen in the past
concerning the T. longipes-T. lurida complex. Forbes
(1948) and Brummitt (1968) treated the two as separate
species while Gillett (1958) placed T. lurida as a variety
of T. longipes. Present research has shown that tradi-
tional characters used to separate them are based on eco-
logical variables which cannot be reliably upheld taxono-
mically.
(3) A number of varieties have been described in this
complex, i.e. T. longipes var. uncinata Harv.: 209
(1862). Type: Transvaal, Pretoria Distr., in nemorosis
ad Aapies R., Zeyher 455 (BM, GRA, K!, SAM); T.
longipes var. icosisperma Brummitt: 313 (1968), e.g.
Moss & Rogers 523 (K) from Komatipoort, Transvaal;
T. lurida var. lissocarpa Brummitt: 320 (1968). Type:
Transvaal, Soutpansberg, ± 9 miles E of Louis Tri-
chardt, Farm Rustfontein, Schlieben 7339 (K, holo.!)
and T. lurida var. drummondii Brummitt: 321 (1968),
e.g. Liebenberg 3313 (PRE) from Farm Schagen, Nel-
spruit, Transvaal. More field work is necessary to estab-
lish the validity of these varieties in the Flora area and
they are not considered in this preliminary treatment.
(4) This complex together with the following species,
i.e. T. reptans Bak., T. caerulea Bak. f., T. euprepes
Brummitt and T. euchroa Verdoom forms a clearly
recognizable assemblage that is widespread in tropical
Africa, and with the exception of T. longipes Meisn.
only occurs in the northern extremities of the Flora area.
5. Tephrosia euchroa Verdoorn in Bothalia 3: 239
(1937). Type: Transvaal, Soutpansberg Distr., rocky
NW slopes of Soutpansberg, Obermeyer, Schweickerdt
& Verdoorn 73 (PRE, holo. !; K!).
Distribution: N Transvaal.
Vouchers: Acocks 16762 (K, PRE); Gertenbach 4914
(PRE); Pienaar 287 (K, PRE); Smuts & Gillett 4080 (K,
PRE); Van der Schijff 1824 (PRE).
6. Tephrosia euprepes Brummitt in Boletim da
Sociedade Broteriana, ser. 2, 41: 292 (1968). Type:
Zimbabwe, western Div., Nyamandhlovu Distr., Bon-
golo, West 2694 (SRGH, holo.!; K!).
Distribution: N Botswana.
Vouchers: Allen 299BCD (K); Lugard 152, 175 (K);
Rand 19, 20 (BM).
7. Tephrosia caerulea Bak. /., Leguminosae of
Tropical Africa 1: 197 (1926). Type: Zambia, Maza-
buka, Woods 51 (BM, holo.!).
7a. subsp. caerulea.
Distribution: N Botswana.
Vouchers: De Winter 4406 (K, PRE); Smith 2211 (K).
7b. subsp. otaviensis (Dinter) Schreiber & Brum-
mitt in Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana, s6r. 2, 41: 292
(1968).
Tephrosia otaviensis Dinter in Feddes Repertorium 30: 204 (1932).
Type: SWA/Namibia, Hereroland, Klein Otavi, Dinter 5747 (NH,
iso.!; K, photo.!).
Tephrosia longipes sensu Schreiber: 298 (1957).
Distribution: SWA/Namibia and N Botswana.
Vouchers: De Winter & Marais 4832 (K); Dinter
7570 (K); Muller & Biegel 2305 (K).
8. Tephrosia reptans Bak. in Oliver, Flora of
Tropical Africa 2: 121 (1871). Types: Tanzania, Tabora
Distr., nr Tabora, Speke & Grant s.n. (K, lecto. !) and
Mozambique, Shupanga, Kirk s.n.
8a. var. reptans.
Brummitt: 284 (1968).
Distribution: NE Transvaal.
Vouchers: Smalberger 29 (PRE); Stephen 303 (PRE).
Note
Lectotypification by Brummitt: 283 (1968).
9. Tephrosia natalensis H. M. L. Forbes in Botha-
lia 4: 988 (1948). Type: Natal, Howick, Wood 8341
(NH, holo.!; K!).
9a. subsp. natalensis.
Tephrosia apiculata H. M. L. Forbes: 989 (1948). Type: Natal,
Paulpietersburg Distr. between Paulpietersburg and Sunkelsdrift,
Acocks 11749 (NH, holo.!; K, photo.!).
Distribution: S Transvaal, Swaziland, N Natal and
Natal midlands.
Vouchers: Arnold 252 (K, PRE); Compton 29168 (K,
PRE); Devenish 1722 (K, PRE); Schrire 1289, 2254
(NH).
9b. subsp. pseudocapitata (H. M. L. Forbes) B. D.
Schrire, comb, et stat. nov. Tephrosia pseudocapitata
H. M. L. Forbes in Bothalia 4: 988 (1948). Type: Natal,
Greytown Distr., Wylie s.n. (NH21787) (NH, holo.!;
K!).
Distribution: Natal midlands.
Vouchers: Buthelezi 332 (NH); Stirton 5203 (K,
PRE); Wilms 1940 (K); Wylie s.n. (NH27992) (K, NH).
12
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
Note
The T. natalensis group may be an isolated ally of the
complex comprising species numbered four to eight.
10. Tephrosia radicans Welw. ex Bak. in Oliver,
Flora of Tropical Africa 2: 121 (1871). Type: Angola,
Huilla, in pratis humidis ad formicar monticul de
Varzeas e Catumba, Welwitsch 2082 (BM, holo. !; K!).
Distribution: SWA/Namibia and N Transvaal.
Vouchers: De Winter & Marais 4992 (K, PRE); Gal-
pin 8959 (K, PRE); Rehmann 5529 (K); Schlechter 4679
(K); Van Vuuren 1411 (K, PRE).
11. Tephrosia macropoda (E. Mey.) Harv. in
Harv. & Sond., Flora Capensis 2: 210 (1862). Syntypes:
E Cape, inter Kachu et Zandplaat, Drege s.n. (B);
Transkei, inter Gekau et Basche, Drege s.n. (K!); inter
Umtata et Umgazana, Drege s.n. (K!). See note (1)
below.
Apodynomene macropoda E. Mey.: 112 (1836). Apodynomene
macropoda E. Mey. var. latifolia E. Mey.: 1 12 (1836).
Apodynomene macropoda E. Mey. var. angustifolia E. Mey.: 112
(1836). Type: Transkei, in collibus graminosis prope Umsikaba, Drege
s.n. (?).
Apodynomene aemula E. Mey.: 113 (1836). Tephrosia aemula (E.
Mey.) Harv. & Sond.: 210 (1862), pro parte. Type: ECape, in grami-
nosis inter Zandplaat et Komba, Drege s.n. (B, holo.).
Tephrosia triphylla Harms in 0. Kuntze: 57 (1898). Type: Natal,
Krantzkloof, Kuntze s.n. (NY, holo.-K, photo.!).
Tephrosia armitageana Chiov.: 421 (1908). Type: Natal, Port Natal,
Armitage 547 (? FI).
Tephrosia spathacea sensu H. M. L. Forbes: 995 (1948), non
Hutch. & Burtt Davy: xxxi (1932).
Distribution: widespread in the eastern half of the
Flora area.
Vouchers: Compton 27355 (K, PRE); Huntley 4 72 (K,
NU); Liebenberg 7990 (K, PRE); Mogg 5812 (K, PRE);
Rogers 18020 (K, PRE).
1 la. var. diffusa (E. Mey.) B. D. Schrire, comb, et
stat. nov.
Apodynomene diffusa E. Mey.: 113 (1836). Tephrosia diffusa (E.
Mey.) Harv. in Harv. & Sond.: 210 (1862). Type: Transkei, in rupes-
tris ad fluvium quendam minorem inter Umsamvubu et Umsikaba,
Drege s.n. (K!).
Apodynomene aemula E. Mey.: 113 (1836). Tephrosia aemula (E.
Mey.) Harv. in Harv. & Sond.: 210 ( 1862) pro parte. Type: E Cape, in
graminosis inter Zandplaat et Komga, Drege s.n. (B, holo ).
Distribution: ecotypes within the range of the species.
Vouchers: Acocks 21940 (PRE); Ross 1886 (K, NH);
Strey 6620 (K, PRE); Venter 7708 (PRE); Wood 886
(K).
Notes
(1) H. M. L. Forbes examined material in B before the
Second World War for her revision (1948). She desig-
nated a specimen, Drege (Herb. Meyer 5471) as a type
thus choosing one of the syntypes in Meyer’s protologue
as the lectotype. Since this material was destroyed and it
is not clear which syntype she chose, a new lectotype can
be designated from any of the original syntypes.
(2) The T. macropoda complex is a widespread group
of trailing to prostrate open grassland herbs and over the
major part of its range, i.e. Transvaal and much of Natal,
Transkei and the eastern Cape, it is easily recognizable
as one species, T. macropoda. On the periphery of this
range, however, there is considerable divergence from
the typical form:
(a) Along the eastern coastal strip plants are particularly
robust but are clearly recognizable as T. macropoda.
(b) In the following regions plants may be much reduced
in size:
(i) the higher altitude foothills and slopes of the Dra-
kensberg in Natal to Transkei;
(ii) the southerly end of the species range in the E
Cape;
(iii) the coastal hinterland of Transkei and Natal;
(iv) parts of the E Transvaal and Swaziland.
(3) One distinct form (referred to here as var. diffusa)
occurs in these areas, and is associated with edaphically
dry granite or sandstone outcrops. Plants are procum-
bent, diffusely branching and often form dense mats.
Typical T. macropoda may be found in the surrounding
grassland and the two may appear to be quite separate
taxa.
(4) T. macropoda is, however, a variable species and
smaller-leaved forms do occur and will intergrade with
the typical form, particularly at the extremes of its range
and with increasing altitude. These are sometimes diffi-
cult to distinguish from the diffuse plant in the herbar-
ium. The latter is clearly an ecotype and the name is
retained as a variety of T. macropoda but doubtful plants
should be retained in T. macropoda sensu lato.
12. Tephrosia brummittii £. D. Schrire, sp. nov.
T. macropodae affinis, sed stipulis late ovatis, maturitate
conspicue rubris vel brunneis, arete appressis ad caules,
foliis 7—1 1(— 13)-foliolatis, foliolis anguste oblongo-
ellipticis ad oblanceolatis differt.
TYPE. — Natal, 2832 (Mtubatuba): Hlabisa Distr., St
Lucia Estuary Game Park, W of Vidal Rd (-AD), Pooley
1918e (NU, holo.; K, PRE, iso.).
Perennial spreading suffrutex up to 600 mm high, aris-
ing from a woody rootstock. Stems one to many, herba-
ceous except at the base, prostrate to ascending, glabrous
or sparsely pubescent to ascending pilose, branching
near the base. Leaves 7-11 (-13)- foliolate, (30-)
70-120(-140) mm long; stipules (6— )7— 17 x 3-11 mm,
broadly ovate, base often cordate, apex acuminate,
maturing conspicuously red or brown, closely appressed
to the stems; petiole (15-)25-55(-70) mm long, canali-
culate adaxially; leaflets ( 1 2—) 1 8— 35(— 42) x 3— 7(— 12)
mm, narrowly oblong-elliptic or oblanceolate, base
cuneate to rounded, apex emarginate, obtuse or acute,
mucronate, upper surface green, glabrous or minutely
puberulent, lower surface moderately appressed to
spreading greyish pubescent. Pseudoracemes terminal
and leaf-opposed, with 1— 2(— 3) flowers open at any one
time. Bracts 5-15 x 4-10 mm, broadly ovate-acumi-
nate, navicular, completely enclosing young buds, sca-
rious, chestnut-brown, minutely bifid at the apex. Flow-
ers 11-21 mm long. Calyx tube to 4 mm and teeth to 6
mm long, teeth lanceolate at the base narrowing to a long
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
13
attenuate apex, longer than the tube, sparsely to modera-
tely pubescent with long spreading hairs on the teeth.
Standard 11-21 mm long, to 20 mm wide, broadly obo-
vate to orbicular, narrowing to a claw 2-3 mm long at
the base, apex rounded or emarginate, dorsally densely
pubescent, ventrally glabrous, scattered punctate-glan-
dular as are all the petals. Wings 10-18 x 7 mm includ-
ing a claw 2-3 mm long, cultrate with an auricle at the
base of the lamina above the claw, sculpturing present,
upper basal, up to 20 transcostal lamellae. Keel petals up
to 18 x 7 mm including a claw 2-3 mm long. Staminal
sheath 10-14 mm long, the stamens then free and alter-
nating in length, 5 and 4 filaments to 4 and 3 mm long
respectively, vexillary stamen to 17 mm long, free.
Ovary to 16 mm long. Style to 8 mm long, curving erect
from the ovary, flattened dorsiventrally and densely pu-
bescent on both surfaces. Stigma capitate. Fruits imma-
ture, glabrous. Seeds 10-16, transversely arranged.
SWAZILAND. — 2631 (Mbabane): Umbuluzi Falls near stream
(-AD), Compton 25094 (NBG, PRE).
NATAL. — 2732 (Ubombo): Lebombo Mountains, Gwalaweni For-
est (-AC), Brenan 14272 (K, PRE); Umpangazi Lake (-DA), Strey
5097 (NH, PRE). 2831 (Nkandla): Mtunzini Distr., 15 miles NW of
Port Dumford (-DD), Codd & Dyer 2826 (K, PRE). 2832 (Mtuba-
tuba): Hlabisa Distr., St Lucia Estuary Game Park, W of Vidal Rd
(-AD), Pooley 1918e (K, NU, PRE).
This species has often been confused with T. macro-
poda var. macropoda, from which it differs by having
stipules maturing conspicuously red or brown and re-
maining closely appressed to the stems, and leaves 7-1 1
(— 13)-foliolate with leaflets narrowly oblong-elliptic to
oblanceolate. T. macropoda var. macropoda is distin-
guished by having stipules maturing dark brown and
curling away from the stems, and leaves 3-7-foliolate
with leaflets obovate to narrowly obovate or elliptic.
T. brummitti occurs sympatrically with T. macropoda
and, although a few problem plants occur in overlapping
areas, e.g. Huntley 194 (PRE) from Mtunzini, Natal,
they are not readily identifiable as intermediates.
Two specimens from southern Mozambique, cited by
Brummitt: 372 (1968) as T. incarnata, also belong to
this species. These are: 1, Sabie, Lebombo Mountains,
Meponduine, Pedro & Pedrogao 735 (LMJ); 2,
Namaacha, near the Canada Dry factory, Barbosa &
Lemos 7534 (COI, LISC, LMJ). Both localities are near
the border with Swaziland in the Lebombo Mountains.
The plants grow at altitudes from 0-450 m in the
coastal and low veld vegetation types of N Zululand, S
Mozambique and E Swaziland. These prostrate herbs
occur in open grassland from coastal dunes to stream-
banks and forest margins along the Lebombo Mountains.
This species is named in honour of Dr R. K. Brummitt
of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, who has contrib-
uted much to the knowledge of the genus Tephrosia from
the Flora Zambesiaca area.
13. Tephrosia albissima H.M.L. Forbes in
Bothalia 4; 995 (1948). Type: Natal, Greytown, Wylie
s.n. (NH21590) (NH, holo.!; K!, PRE!).
13a. subsp. albissima.
Tephrosia galpinii H. M. L. Forbes: 996 (1948). Type: Natal, Grey-
town, on railway bank on town commonage, Galpin 14755 (PRE,
holo.!; NH!).
Distribution: Natal midlands to Transkei.
Vouchers: Schrire 298, 312, 831 (NH); Stirton 5598
(K, PRE); Wylie s.n. (NH3715f) (NH).
13b. subsp. zuluensis (H. M. L. Forbes) B. D.
Schrire, comb, et stat. nov. Tephrosia zuluensis
H. M. L. Forbes in Bothalia 4: 997 (1948). Type: Natal,
Nkandhla, Wylie s.n. (NH9399) (NH, holo. !).
Tephrosia unifolia H. M. L. Forbes in Bothalia 4: 996 (1948). Type:
Natal, W Zululand, Baker s.n. (NH19781 ) ( NH, holo.!).
Distribution: W Zululand and N Natal.
Vouchers: Codd 6987 (K, NH); Grobbelaar 801
(PRE); Ngwenya 31 (NH); Schrire 2216 (NH); Turner 1
(NH).
Notes
(1) T. albissima is another variable complex including
a number of names published simultaneously by
H. M. L. Forbes (1948). A geographically distinct segre-
gate, T. zuluensis is given subspecific status and this
includes those forms from western Zululand and nor-
thern Natal which have almost sessile leaves and very
reduced densely pilose leaf rhachides. This creates prob-
lems in the choice of key characters because the typical
subspecies becomes very much reduced in size at the
opposite end of its range in the higher altitude areas of
Kokstad and Harding in eastern Griqualand (following a
similar trend to T. macropoda sensu lato.).
(2) Another entity, T. unifolia H. M. L. Forbes is
placed in synonomy under subsp. zuluensis but further
field study is needed to be certain of its position. The
best example is J. Turner 1 (NH) from the Babanango
Distr. in western Zululand. The leaves are distinctly pe-
tiolate with leaflets narrowly oblong-elliptic to oblanceo-
late, both longer and narrower than typical subsp. zu-
luensis. The collections Brown & Shapiro 73 (K) from
Itala Nature Reserve and Ross 1741 (PRE) from near
Goedgegun in the Louwsberg, need further investigation
as they appear to be somewhat intermediate between T.
albissima and T. macropoda sensu lato.
14. Tephrosia gobensis Brummitt in Boletim da
Sociedade Broteriana, ser. 2, 41: 368 (1968). Type:
Mozambique, Goba Distr., De Sousa 132 (LISC, holo.;
PRE!).
Distribution: E Swaziland.
Vouchers: Compton 31915 (PRE) Culverwell 463 (K,
PRE).
15. Tephrosia bachmannii Harms in Botanische
Jahrbiicher 26: 286 (1899). Type: Transkei, Pondoland,
Bachmann 616 (B, holo.).
Distribution: N Transkei and S Natal.
Vouchers: Crawford 390 (K, PRE); Strey 9591 (K,
my, Wood 3021 ,3101 (K).
Notes
This species is very variable, with three distinct forms:
(a) procumbent grassland suffrutices e.g. Shackleton
367 (KEI);
(b) low woody bushes with linear-oblanceolate leaf-
lets, from exposed rocky areas e.g. Acocks 13375 (PRE);
14
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
(c) woody subshrubs up to 2 m high with broader,
obovate leaflets conspicuously white sericeous abax-
ially, e.g. Sidey4185 (PRE).
Further investigation is needed to assess this variation.
16. Tephrosia grandiflora (Ait.) Pers., Synopsis
Plantarum 2: 329 (1807). Types: Cape, Hort. Kew 1777,
seed from C. B. S., Masson s.n. (BM, syn.!); Africa
australis, Masson s.n. (BM, syn.!).
Galega grandiflora Ait.: 70 (1789).
Distribution: SW Cape to S Natal.
Vouchers: Bruce 453 (K, PRE); Marais 1195 (K,
PRE); Stirton 6297; 6320 (K, PRE); Strey 6897 (K, NH,
PRE).
Notes
The largest and most difficult complex, which is allied
to both T. albissima and T. macropoda sensu lato, com-
prises those erect or bushy subshrubs related to T. gran-
diflora (species 14 to 21). T. grandiflora has tradition-
ally been confused with many of the species in this group
but presents no problems itself. The isolated T. gobensis
from the Lebombo region seems most closely allied to it
as does the endemic T. bachmannii from the sandstone
outcrop areas of northern Pondoland/southem Natal.
17. Tephrosia inandensis H. M. L. Forbes in
Bothalia 4: 276 (1948). Type: Natal, Inanda Distr.,
Wood 289 (NH, holo.!; K!).
Distribution: Eshowe to Inanda Districts of Natal.
Vouchers: Forbes 108 (NH); J. P. Forbes s.n. (NH);
Lawn 537 (NH) Rogers 24018 (PRE); Stirton 5341
(NH).
Note
T. inandensis is closely allied to T. glomeruliflora
(no. 18), and Schrire 330 (NH) from the Natal coastal
area adjacent to Eshowe is a hybrid between them.
18. Tephrosia glomeruliflora Meisn. in Hooker’s
London Journal of Botany 2: 86 (1843). Type: Natal,
Port Natal, Gueinzius s.n. (K, holo. !).
18a. subsp. glomeruliflora.
Distribution: Natal coastal belt and adjacent midlands.
Vouchers: Baijnath 145 (K, NU); Grobbelaar 1814
(K, PRE); Nichols 840 (NH); Pole Evans 3647 (K,
PRE); Wood 11400 (NH).
18b. subsp. meisneri (Hutch. & Burtt Davy) B. D.
Schrire, comb, et stat. nov. Tephrosia meisneri Hutch.
& Burtt Davy: xxxi & 377 (1932). Type: Transvaal,
Sanderson s.n. (K, holo.!).
Tephrosia incarnata Brummitt: 370 (1968). Type: Zimbabwe,
Umtali Distr., Himalayas, Engwa, Wild 4450 (SRGH, holo.; K ! ,
PRE!).
Distribution: E half of Transvaal, N Natal to Natal
midlands. It also extends northwards into Zimbabwe.
Vouchers: Brenan 14116 (K, PRE); Germishuizen
2852 (PRE); Killian 14 (PRE); Nichols 508 (NH); Pole
Evans s.n. (PRE); Strey 7968 (NH).
Notes
(1) The glomerulose inflorescences and geographical
distribution of the two taxa T. glomeruliflora and
T. meisneri suggest one species with two distinct subspe-
cies, and Strey 8371 (K, NH) from Ismont near Pieter-
maritzburg and Coleman 973 (NH) from Byrne in the
Natal midlands indicate a possible transition from one to
the other.
(2) The typical subspecies shows considerable varia-
tion in bract size. Some individuals have minute bracts
not at all obscuring the young buds in the inflorescence
(as in the type of the species). The bulk, though, have
bracts enclosing the young buds completely. There is
little evidence of intermediates between them and on
further investigation the latter may warrant varietal
status.
(3) A few plants of subsp. meisneri are depauperate
e.g. Meeuse 9797 (K) from the Soutpansberg and Galpin
14451 (K) from Pilgrim’s Rest. These require further
investigation as mentioned under the next species.
19. Tephrosia cordata Hutch. & Burtt Davy in
Burtt Davy, Flowering plants and ferns of the Transvaal
2: xxxi (1932). Type: Swaziland, Mbabane, Burtt Davy
2886 (K, holo.!; BM!, PRE!).
Distribution: E Transvaal and Swaziland.
Vouchers: Codd 8198 (K, PRE); Compton 23302,
29985 (K); Elan-Puttick 320 (K, PRE); Stirton 1768 (K,
PRE).
Note
T. cordata requires further study in the field, particu-
larly as regards variation in stipule size and possible
links with T. glomeruliflora subsp. meisneri, e.g. Galpin
13134 (K) from Dullstroom and Pole Evans 4245 (K)
from Hendriksdal (both in the E Transvaal).
20. Tephrosia subulata Hutch. & Burtt Davy in
Burtt Davy, Flowering plants and ferns of the Transvaal
2: xxxi & 377 (1932). Type: Transvaal, Barberton
Distr., Highland Creek, Galpin 843 (K, holo.!; NH!,
PRE!, SAM).
Distribution: E Transvaal and Weza District in E
Griqualand.
Vouchers: Balsinhas 3153 (K, PRE); Stirton 10388
(NH); Thorncroft 36 (PRE); Van der Merwe 247 (K,
PRE); Viljoen 133 (K, PRE).
Note
T. subulata occurs sympatrically with T. cordata in
the E Transvaal, and Kluge 2347 (PRE) from Kaapsche-
hoop is an aberrant specimen that may represent a hybrid
between them.
21. Tephrosia shiluwanensis Schinz in Vierteljah-
resschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zurich
52: 423 (1907). Type: Transvaal, Soutpansberg Distr.,
Shiluwane, Junod 2355 (Z, holo.).
Tephrosia spaihacea Hutch. & Bunt Davy in Burtt Davy: xxxi
(1932). Type: Transvaal, Lydenburg Distr., Wilms 341 (K, holo.!).
Tephrosia medleyi H. M. L. Forbes: 968 (1948). Type: Natal,
Kranskop Distr. , nr Greytown, Wood 5984 (NH, holo. !).
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
15
Tephrosia wyliei H. M. L. Forbes: 991 (1948). Type: Natal,
Elandskop Distr., Sevenfontein nr Boston, Wylie s.n. (NH7996) (NH,
holo. !).
Distribution: E Transvaal, Natal to Transkei.
Vouchers: Codd 6961 (PRE); Collins 3266 (PRE);
Germishuizen 95 (K, PRE); Junod 1106 (K, PRE);
Kluge 2253 (K, PRE); Tyson 1434 (K).
Notes
(1) 7. shiluwanensis is a variable species. At the west-
ern end of its range, i.e. from the Pietermaritzburg to
Harding Districts, plants tend to be less robust with
bracts generally more conspicuous and ovate-apiculate.
This group matches the type of T. wyliei but for the most
part they cannot reliably be separated from T. shiluwa-
nensis.
(2) Fakude 68 (PRE) is a hybrid with T. glomeruli-
flora subsp. glomeruliflora from the Hlabisa District of
Natal.
(3) An aberrant specimen, Evans 345 (NH) from the
Umlaas District between Pietermaritzburg and Durban
may be a hybrid with T. inandensis and requires further
investigation.
(4) Two additional species have been recorded as in-
troductions to southern Africa but there is no evidence
that they have become naturalized:
(a) T. Candida (Roxb.) DC.; Roxburgh s.n., Cape of
Good Hope ex Botanic Garden, Calcutta (K);
(b) T. vogelii Hook, f.; Strey 9009, Ntsubane,
Transkei (NH, PRE).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
My sincere thanks to the following for much valuable
advice and constructive criticism: Mr C. H. Stirton, Dr
R. M. Polhill, Mr G. P. Lewis and Dr R. K. Brummitt.
REFERENCES
AITON, W. 1789. Horius kewensis 3: 70. London.
BAKER, E. G. 1926. The Leguminosae of tropical Africa 1: 197.
Gent.
BAKER, J. G. 1871. Papilionaceae. In D. Oliver, Flora of tropical
Africa 2: 121. Reeve, London.
BOSMAN, M. T. M. & DE HAAS, A. J. P. 1983. The genus Tephro-
sia in Malesia. Blumea 28,2: 421-487.
BRUMMITT, R. K. 1968. New and little known species from the
Flora Zambesiaca area. xx. Tephrosia. Boletim da Sociedade Bro-
teriana, ser. 2,41: 219-393.
BRUMMITT, R. K. 1980. Reconsideration of the genera Ptycholo-
bium, Caulocarpus, Lupinophyllum and Requienia in relation to
Tephrosia. Kew Bulletin 35: 459-473.
BURTT DAVY, J. 1932. A manual of the flowering plants and fems of
the Transvaal with Swaziland, South Africa 2: xxxi-xxxii,
375-379. Longmans, London.
CHIOVENDA, E. 1908. Papilionaceae in R. Pirotta, Flora della colo-
nia Eritrea. Annuario del R. Istituto botanico di Roma 8,3: 421.
DINTER, K. 1932. Diagnosen neuer sudwestafrikanischer Pflanzen.
Feddes Repertorium 30:204.
ENGLER, A. 1888. Plantae Marlothianae . Botanische Jahrbiicher fur
Systematik. Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 10:29.
FORBES, H. M. L. 1948. A revision of the South African species of
the genus Tephrosia Pers. Bothalia 4: 95 1-1001 .
GEESINK, R. 1981. Tephrosieae. In R. M. Polhill & P. H. Raven,
Advances in legume systematics 1: 245-260. Royal Botanic Gar-
dens, Kew.
GEESINK, R. 1984. Scala Millettiearum. Leiden Botanical Series 8:
1 18-121. Brill, Leiden.
GILLETT, J. B. 1958. Notes on Tephrosia in tropical Africa. Kew
Bulletin 13: 125.
HARMS, H. 1899. Leguminosae Africanae II. Botanische Jahrbiicher
fur Systematik. Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 26:
286. '
HARVEY, W. H. 1862. Leguminosae. In W. H. Harvey & O. W.
Sonder, Flora capensis 2: 203-211. Hodges & Smith, Dublin.
HOOKER, W. J. 1843. The Flora of South Africa. The London Jour-
nal of Botany 2: 86-87.
KUNTZE, C. E. O. 1898. Revisio generum plantarum 3: 57. Leipzig.
MEYER, E. H. F. 1836. Commentariorum de plantis Africae austra-
lioris: 1 1 1-1 13. Leipzig.
PERSOON, C. H. 1807. Synopsis plantarum 2,2: 329. Paris.
SCHINZ, H. 1907. Mitteilungen aus dem botanischen Museum der
Universitat Zurich (xxxvi). Vierteljahresschrift der Naturfor-
schenden Gesellschaft in Zurich 52: 423.
SCHREIBER, A. 1957. Beitrage zur Kenntms der Leguminosen Sud-
westafrikas. Mitteilungen der Botanischen Staatssammlung
Miinchen 19: 298.
SONDER, O. W. 1850. Beitrage zur Flora von Sudafrika. Linnaea 23:
30-31.
VERDOORN, I. C. 1937. An enumeration of plants collected in the
northern Transvaal. Bothalia 3: 239.
Bothalia 17,1: 17-23(1987)
A new species and a new combination of Asc/epias(Asclepiadaceae) in
southern Africa
A. NICHOLAS*
Keywords: Asclepias, Asclepiadaceae, new combination, new species, southern Africa, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
A new species is described: Asclepias gordon-grayae A. Nicholas, sp. nov. and a new combination is made: Asclepias
compressidens (N.E. Br.) A. Nicholas, comb. nov.
U1TTREKSEL
’n Nuwe spesie word beskryf: Asclepias gordon-grayae A. Nicholas, sp. nov. en ’n nuwe kombinasie word gemaak:
Asclepias compressidens (N.E.Br.) A. Nicholas, comb. nov.
1. Asclepias gordon-grayae A. Nicholas, sp. nov.
A. pateni N.E. Br. et A. praemorsae Schltr. affinis; dif-
fert a A. praemorsa appendicibus antherae brevibus et a
A. pateni margine supero coronae prope extremum dis-
tale fisso.
Herba perennis. Caudex profundus, lignosus. Caulis
unicus, erectus, gracilis, pubescens. Folia expansa,
anguste lanceolata ad linearia, 34-128 x 2,25— (—35)
mm. Inflorescentia umbellata, ad nodos et terminalis,
semi-pendens. Flores rosei ad ebumei. Corolla expansa
usque ascendens, lobis ovatis, basi connatis. Corona
cucullata-saccata, appendicibus proximalibus dentatis,
subfalcatis, extremo distali coronae brevissimo et ob-
tuso, sinus coronae saccati, carina coronae rotundata.
Appendices antherae ovatae usque ellipticae, 1,0-1, 4 x
0,5—1 ,0 mm. Apex styli truncatus. Pollinia hemitrullata
usque hemipyriformes, 0,68-0,92 x 0,40-0,52 mm.
Fructus fusiformis, apice rostrato.
TYPE.— 2832 (Mtubatuba): (-AB) Natal, Zululand,
St Lucia, Eastern Shores State Forest, Simbonvini vlei,
20 m (65 ft) alt., March 1982, Nicholas 1285 (PRE,
holo.; CPF, K, NH, MO).
Perennial herb with woody, semi-swollen, deep-
seated underground organs. Stem single, erect, 240-750
mm high. Leaves spreading, narrowly lanceolate to lin-
ear, occasionally upper leaves falcate, 34—128 x 2-25
(-35) mm, apex acute to acuminate, base minutely
auriculate to minutely hastate; petiole 0,6-1, 3 (-2,0)
mm long. Inflorescence umbelliform, semipendulous,
axillary and terminal, 1-4 per plant, 4-6 (-9)-flowered;
peduncles 7-14 (-24) mm long. Flowers 6-14 x
4, 5-8,0 mm. pink or pale pink to cream; pedicel 7-20
mm long. Sepals lanceolate, occasionally triangular or
narrowly ovate, 2, 2-3, 4 X (0,7—) 1 ,4 — 2 , 1 mm. Corolla
spreading to ascending; petals connate at base, ovate,
apex acute, 6, 4-7, 7 x 3, 2-4, 9 mm, white, cream or
pink in centre and near apex, margins white to pale pink,
abaxial surface glabrous, margins minutely scabrous.
Corona lobes fused to staminal tube 0, 3-0,5 mm above
* Botanical Research Institute, Private Bag X101 , Pretoria 0001 .
corolla, saccate or cyathiform, 1,3-2, 6 x 2, 3-3, 3 mm,
white to cream with pink keel. Upper proximal ends
extended into 2 long, dentate, subfalcate appendages
1,5-2, 8 x 0,4-0, 8 mm, level with style apex, 2 tooth-
or wing-like flaps present below appendages on proximal
margin. Upper margin oblique to style apex, proximal
end usually higher than distal end, which is sometimes
raised into a short, blunt projection deeply cleft at apex,
cleft running a short distance along rounded keel. Stami-
nal column 2-3 mm high; alar fissure 1, 2-2,0 mm long;
anther wings curvirostrate, 1, 2-2,0 x 0,5-0, 9 mm;
anther appendages ovate to elliptic, 1,0-1 ,4 x 0, 5-1,0
mm, membranous, white, decumbent on style apex.
Style apex truncate, 1, 5-3,0 mm wide. Pollinia hemi-
trulloid to hemipyriform, 0,68-0,92 x 0,5-0,52 mm;
translator arms 0,2-0,32 mm long; corpusculum
0,28-0,4 x 0,5-0,52 mm. Fruits fusiform, ±65 x ± 10
mm, puberulous. Figure 1.
NATAL. — 2831 (Nkandla): Ngoye Forest Reserve (-DC), Gordon-
Gray 6191 (NU), Hilliard 2699 (NH, NU), Huntley 624 (NU), Nicho-
las 1074 (NU), Stewart 2155 (NU), Stirton 466 (PRE), Strey 6106
(NH, NU), Wood 5678 (NH), 10823 (BOL, SAM). 2832 (Mtubatuba):
St Lucia (-AB), Cawood 141 (CPF), Nicholas 1285 (CPF, K, MO,
NH, PRE); St Lucia (-AD), Crundall s.n. (PRE 51584), Pooley 1819
(NU). 2930 (Stanger): Gingindlovu (-BA), Wood 10828 (SAM).
Asclepias gordon-grayae ** is endemic to coastal
Zululand where it grows in boggy situations. This spec-
ies has been named in honour of Professor K. D. Gor-
don-Gray who has collected extensively (particularly in
Natal) and who for many years lectured in taxonomy at
the University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg. Professor
Gordon-Gray has through her many publications and her
teaching of taxonomy made a positive contribution to the
knowledge of the southern African flora. A. gordon-
grayae has in the past been confused with A. patens
N.E.Br. with which it has many affinities. Vegetatively
** In Nicholas (1982) the manuscript name A. gracilicaulis was used
(in reference to the long, thin, wavy stem of this species). This name
was never validly published and has been dropped here in favour of the
name A. gordon-grayae.
18
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
FIGURE 1 . Asclenias gordon-grayae. 1 , flowering plant, x 0,Z5, Edwards s.n. (BOL); 2, node showing bifariously arranged hairs and leaf
bases, x 4, Gordon-Gray 6191 (NU); 3, flower, x 7, Stewart 2155 (NU); 4, corona lobe, side view, X 3, Stewart 2155 (NU); 5,
polhnanum, X 130, Stewart 2155 (NU).
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
19
tell these two species apart. However, there are marked
differences in flower colour, corona lobe size and shape,
anther appendage size and shape and pollinia width (Fig-
ure 2; Table 1). There are also differences in distribution
(Figure 3) and in habitat preference. The number, degree
and consistency of these and other differences are diag-
nostically important and help separate A. gordon-grayae
from its two closest relatives: A. patens and A. prae-
morsa Schltr. (Figures 2, 4 & 5; Table 1). A. gordon-
grayae may be found growing at altitudes between 30
and 900 metres and flowers between September and
April, with a peak period in December.
KEY TO ASCLEPIAS GORDON-GRAYAE AND ITS CLOSEST
ALLIES
la Anther appendages 1 ,7-2,5 X 1 ,0-1 ,6 mm A. praemorsa
lb Anther appendages 0,5-1 ,4 x 0,5-1 ,0 mm:
2a Upper coronal edge entire; southern Natal and Transkei . .
A. patens
2b Upper coronal edge cleft near the distal end; Zululand
only A. gordon-grayae
FIGURE 2. — A comparison of the flowers of: la, Asclepias gordon-grayae, x 5, Stewart 2155 (NU); lb , A. patens x 9,5, Moss 470 (J); lc,
A. praemorsa X 8, Strey 6902 (NH). A comparison of the corona lobes of: 2a, A. gordon-grayae, x 4, Strey 6106 (NU); 2b, A.
patens x 10, Gordon-Gray 961 (NU); 2c, A. praemorsa x 14, Wood 1162 (NH).
FIGURE 3. — Map showing comparative distribution of Asclepias
gordon-grayae, • and A. patens,
2. Asclepias compressidens (N.E.Br.) A. Nicho-
las, comb, et stat. nov.
Asclepias navicularis (E. Mey.) Schltr. var. compressidens N.E.Br.:
683 (1908). Type: Cape, 3225 (Somerset East): Cradock (-BA), Coo-
per 1284 (K, lecto. ! ; PRE!).
Perennial herb with woody, swollen, deep-seated un-
derground organ. Stems 1-6 per plant, decumbent.
Leaves spreading to ascending, linear, occasionally nar-
rowly lanceolate or falcate, 15-85 x (l,5-)2,0-4,5 mm,
apex acuminate, base petiolate, occasionally trullate,
margins slightly revolute; petiole 1, 5-3,0 mm long. In-
florescences umbelliform, terminal, solitary, erect, 1-3
per plant, 4-9-flowered; peduncles 27-35 mm long.
Flowers ±1 X 1,1-1 ,4 mm, pink to light grey. Sepals
ascending, lobes lanceolate, 6, 6-6, 8 x 1, 2-2,0 mm.
Corolla ascending, petals lanceolate to ovate, connate at
base, 10,5-11,8 x ±5 mm, margins slightly revolute,
occasionally sinuate, central vein prominent, colour in-
side lilac-green, outside purple-green, abaxial surface
glabrous, adaxial surface canescent. Corona lobes aris-
ing from base of staminal column, erect, cucullate, sac-
cate, 3, 8-4, 2 x 1 ,7-2,0 mm, upper proximal ends form-
ing two obtuse almost triangular shoulders level with
middle of anther- wings, proximal margins concave to
20
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
Anther-appendage length (mm)
FIGURE 4. — Histographic comparison of anther appendage length in Asclepias gordon-grayae, G; A. patens, P; and A, praemorsa, R.
lobe base and folded to meet, upper margin entire, curv-
ing to form a deltoid, obtuse distal lobe end. Keel dip-
ping near upper distal end, convex and narrow at lobe
base. Sinus a narrow central channel, 3, 8-4, 2 mm long,
with tongue-like appendage. Staminal column 3-4 mm
long; alar fissure 1,7-1 ,8 mm long; anther-wings
1,7-1, 8 x ± 0,7 mm, concave near apex with small
notch on margin; anther appendages tongue-like, ovate,
1,0-1, 3 x 1,1-1 ,2 mm, decumbent. Style apex trun-
cated to slightly conical, 2, 3-2, 8 mm wide. Pollinia
clavate to lacrimiform, 1,5-1 ,6 x ±0,56 mm; translator
arms 0,48-0,56 mm long; corpusculum 0,16-0,24 mm
wide. Figure 6.
NATAL. — 3126 (Queenstown): Queenstown (-DD), Acocks 17936
(PRE). 3225 (Somerset East): Cradock (-BA), Cooper 1284 (K, PRE).
3326 (Grahamstown): Alexandria (-CB), Acocks 17872 (PRE); South-
well (-DA), Bayliss 4631 (PRE). 3327 (Peddie): near East London
(-BB), Wood 1995 (K).
Although closely allied to Asclepias navicularis, A.
compressidens can be distinguished from it by a number
of important characters (Figure 6; Table 2). Also A.
navicularis has a distribution centred on the coastal re-
gion of the eastern Cape, whereas A. compressidens may
also be found further inland (Figure 7) and at higher
altitudes. The specific epithet refers to the compressed
tongue-like appendage that lies within the corona lobe
sinus. A. compressidens and A. disparilis N.E. Br. pos-
sess similar corona lobes, but in A. disparilis the distal
corona lobe appendage is slightly elongated and there is
a transverse shelf-like flap of tissue within the coronal
sinus just above the middle point of the lobe; the leaves
are also shorter and broader (Table 3). A. compressidens
is found at an altitude of between 30 to 140 metres and
flowers from November to February. It is found growing
in grassland and is said to be rare.
Key
Pollinia length
4 0,3-0.35
4 0,36-0,4
1 0,41-0,45
| 0,46 - 0,52
Corona lobe width
? 1,5 - 2,2
f 2,3 - 3,0
f 3,1 - 3,7
• 3,8 - 4,5
Alar fissure length Leaf width
• 0,5 -0,7
•- 0,71-1,1
1,2 -1,5
•— 1,6 - 2,0
-•1-8
-•9-17
-• 18-26
—•27-35
o A. patens
■ A. gordon-grayae
• A. praemorsa
(All measurements are in mm)
FIGURE 5. — Scatter diagram: a comparison of a number of characteristics in Asclepias gordon-grayae, A. patens and A. praemorsa.
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
21
FIGURE 6. — Asclepias compressidens. 1, flowering plant, X 0,6, Acocks 17936 (PRE); 2b, flower, x 6,5, Rogers 12762a (BOL); 3,
pollinarium, x 120, Rogers 1276a (BOL). A comparison of the flowers of: 2a, A. navicularis X 8, Comins 1355 (PRE); 2b, A.
compressidens, x 6,5, Rogers 1276a (BOL).
22
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
TABLE 1. — A comparison of the differences separating Asclepias gordon-grayae, A. patens and A. praemorsa
TABLE 2. — The main diagnostic differences between Asclepias compressidens and A. navicularis
Character
A. compressidens
A. navicularis
Corona lobe shape
Level of corona lobe in relation to
the style apex
Proximal corona lobe end in relation
to the distal end
Corona lobe sinus
Anther-wing (outer edge)
Notch on anther-wing margin
Pollinia
Shorter than the style apex
Lower than the distal end of the lobe
Tongue-like flap inside
Squared
Near the top
Claviform or lacrimiform
Level with the style apex
Level with the distal end of the lobe
Transverse flap-like shelf inside
Round
Near the base
± Rectangular
TABLE 3. — The main diagnostic differences found between Asclepias compressidens and A. disparilis
Character
A. compressidens
A. disparilis
Leaf length
Leaf width
Distal appendage of corona lobe
Corona lobe sinus
15-18 mm
2-4,5 mm
Not produced
Tongue-like projection
12-37 mm
3—9 mm
Slightly produced
Transverse shelf-like flap
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
23
KEY TO ASCLEPI AS COMPRESSIDENS AND ITS CLOSEST ALLIES
la Corona lobe sinus without transverse flap of tissue near apex, compressed tongue-like appendage present
A. compressidens
lb Corona lobe sinus with transverse flap of tissue near apex, no compressed tongue-like appendage present:
2a Upper distal corona lobe edge level with style apex; leaf width at lamina base 1-5 mm A. navicularis
2b Upper distal corona lobe edge level with middle of anther-wing (not level with style apex) leaf width at
lamina base 3-9 mm a. disparilis
FIGURE 7. — Distribution of Asclepias compressidens.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank the Directors and staff of the
following herbaria: BOL, CPF, GRA, J, K, NBG, NH,
NU, P, PRE, RUH, SAM and TCD for the loan of her-
barium specimens; the Director and staff of the Depart-
ment of Environment Affairs and the Head and staff of
the Department of Botany, University of Natal, Pieter-
maritzburg who made facilities available to me for the
study; Mr M. Lambert, Department of Classical Civili-
zation, University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg for help
with the Latin description of Asclepias gor don- gray ae.
REFERENCES
BROWN, N. E. 1908. Asclepiadeae. In W. T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora
capensis 4,1: 518-1036. Reeve, London.
NICHOLAS, A. 1982. Taxonomic studies in Asclepias ( Asclepiada -
ceae) with particular reference to the narrow-leaved species in
southern Africa. M.Sc. thesis, University of Natal, Pietermaritz-
burg.
Bothalia 17,1:25-28(1987)
Two new brown subcrustose Parmelia species from southern Africa
(lichenized Ascomycetes)
F. BRUSSE*
Keywords: new species, lichenized Ascomycetes, Parmelia, southern Africa, subcrustose, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
Two new brown subcrustose species of Parmelia (Lichenes) are described from southern Africa on rock. They are P.
barda Brusse and P. princeps Brusse. The affinities of the two species are discussed.
UITTREKSEL
Twee nuwe bruin halfkorsagtige Parmelia- spesies (Lichenes) is op klippe uit suidelike Afrika beskryf. Die nuwe
spesies is P. barda Brusse en P princeps Brusse. Die verwantskappe van die twee spesies word bespreek.
Parmelia barda Brusse, sp. nov.
Thallus subcrustosus, saxicola, usque ad 50 mm
diametro. Lobi elongati, 0,2-0, 7 mm lati, usque ad 1,5
mm longi, 75-100 /xm crassi. Thallus superne brunneus,
nitidus, isidiis sorediisque nullis. Cortex superior 7-17
jum crassus, anticlinate prosoplectenchymatus, epicor-
tice poroso (Figure 2). Stratum gonidiale 10-35 /xm
crassum, fasciculatum, algis Trebouxiae, 5-22 /xm dia-
metro. Medulla alba, 20-80 /xm crassa. Cortex inferior
hyalinus, paraplectenchymatus, 9-13 /xm crassus. Thal-
lus inf erne pallidus. Rhizinae non bene evolutae. Apo-
thecia sessilia, numerosa, usque ad 0,8 mm diametro.
Hypothecium hyalinum, 15-30 /xm crassum. Subhyme-
nium 10-15 /xm crassum. Hymenium 44-55 /xm altum,
J+ caeruleum. Asci clavati, poricidales, cum tholis J+
caeruleis (Figure 3). Ascosporae octonae, hyalinae, sim-
plices, ellipsoideae, 7-10 x 4, 0-4, 5 /xm. Pycnidia glob-
osa, hyalina, circa 120 /xm diametro. Pycnidiosporae
hyalinae, aciculares, 7-10 x 0,8 /xm. Thallus atranori-
num (±) et materiam ignotam continens.
TYPE. — Cape, 3320 (Montagu): 4 km SW of Mon-
tagu, Kogmans Kloof near the old British Fort of 1899,
on top of an E-W ridge, on Table Mountain Sandstone
outcrops, alt. 200-250 m (-CC), Brusse 3718,
1981.05.12 (PRE, holo.). Figure 1.
Thallus subcrustose, saxicolous, up to 50 mm diam.
Lobes elongate, 0,2-0, 7 mm broad, up to 1,5 mm long,
75-100 /xm thick. Upper surface brown, non-isidiate
and non-sorediate. Upper cortex 7-17 /xm thick, anticli-
FIGURE 1. — Parmelia barda, habit.
Brusse 3718, holotype. Scale in
mm.
* Botanical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and Water
Supply , Private Bag X 1 0 1 , Pretoria 000 1 .
26
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
FIGURE 2. — Parmelia barda, SEM
of upper surface. Brusse 3718,
holotype. Bar = 6,3 /rm.
nally prosoplectenchymatous, epicortex pored (Figure
2). Algal layer clustered, clusters mainly subcortical, but
also scattered in the medulla, 10-35 /xm thick, algae
Trebouxia, 5-22 /xm diam. Medulla white, 20-80 /xm
thick. Lower cortex hyaline, paraplectenchymatous,
9-13 /xm thick. Lower surface pale. Rhizines not well
developed. Apothecia sessile, numerous, up to 0,8 mm
across. Hypothecium hyaline, 15-30 /xm thick. Subhy-
menium 10—15 /xm thick. Hymenium 45-55 /xm high,
J+ blue. Asci clavate, 8-spored, poricidal, tholus J+
blue (Figure 3). Ascospores hyaline, monolocular (but
equatorial ‘plasma-bridges’ common), ellipsoid, 7—10 x
4, 0-4, 5 /xm. Pycnidia hyaline, globose, about 120 /xm
diam. Pycnidiospores hyaline needles, 7-10 x 0,8 /xm.
Chemistry: Atranorin (±) and an unidentified substance
present (Table 1: bard-1).
TABLE 1. — TLC data for the two unidentified lichen substances.
using norstictic acid and atranorin as standards (Culberson 1972)
The rather narrow ascospores of this species are like
those of the genus Protoparmelia Choisy. Protoparmelia
differs from this species in many other respects even
though it is also brown. The paraphyses are not capitate
and capped, and the tholus iodine reaction differs signifi-
cantly from Protoparmelia. At present the degree of tho-
lus reaction variation is rather marked in Parmelia, but it
is not yet clear how much variation there is within one
species. If the iodine reaction pattern within the tholus
proves to be consistent, one could use these patterns for
generic segregation of the genus Parmelia, particularly if
these correlate with the presently used thalline and chem-
ical characters. The thallus anatomy of Protoparmelia
badia, the type of Protoparmelia (Hafellner 1984) is also
divergent from that of this new species. It was
therefore thought best to place this species in the genus
Parmelia. In fact the cortex reacts green with concen-
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
27
FIGURE 5. — Parmelia princeps,
SEM of upper surface. Brusse
3074, holotype Bar = 5,9 pm.
FIGURE 4. — Parmelia princeps,
habit. Brusse 3074, holotype.
Scale in mm.
trated nitric acid, and can be considered a small subcrus-
tose member of the Neofuscae (Esslinger 1977), despite
the additional presence of atranorin. P. bar da was tested
twice for chemical contents, the second run revealed no
atranorin. The type specimen is growing on a rock with
two micro- aspects and this may explain this difference.
More exposed positions usually support specimens with
a greater quantity of a particular lichen substance.
Although the substance in the medulla was not identi-
fied further, the spot characteristics indicated that it may
be an orcinol para-depside. The Rf data for ‘bard-1’ are
similar to those given for loxodellic acid (Esslinger
1977, p. 19), but this could not be confirmed by direct
comparison, for lack of a lichen at PRE containing loxo-
dellic acid, or a confirmatory test such as a micro-crystal
test (no published data). Nevertheless all the known sub-
crustose species of the section Neofusca contain depsi-
dones, with the exception of the New Zealand endemic,
P. minuta Essl. which contains gyrophoric acid
(Esslinger 1977).
At present this species is known only from the type
specimen from Kogmans Kloof near Montagu.
Parmelia princeps Brusse, sp. nov.
Thallus subcrustosus, saxicola, usque ad 25 mm
diametro. Lobi elongati, 0, 1-0,3 lati, usque ad 1 mm
longi, 80-95 pm crassi. Thallus superne atro-brunneus,
nitidus, isidiis sorediisque destitutus. Cortex superior
7-10 /im crassus, epicortice poroso (Figure 5). Stratum
gonidiale 15-35 pm crassum, algis Trebouxiae, 5-18
pm diametro. Medulla alba, 20-45 pm crassa. Cortex
inferior paraplectenchymatus, circa 15 pm crassus,
brunneus. Thallus inf erne piceus. Rhizinae non bene
28
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
evolutae. Apothecia sessilia, rara, usque ad 0,5 mm
diametro. Hypothecium hyalinum, 30-33 /zm crassum,
paraplectenchymatum, cellulis 3, 5-7, 5 /zm diametro.
Subhymenium 30-45 /zm crassum. Hymenium hyalinum,
50-60 /zm altum, J+ caeruleum. Asci clavati, porici-
dales, cum tholis J+ caeruleis (Figure 6). Ascosporae
hyalinae, simplices, ellipsoideae, 9,5-12,5 x 5, 0-6,0
/zm. Pycnidia non visa. Thallus acidum squamaticum
continens.
TYPE. — Cape, 3218 (Clanwilliam), 3 km W of Oly-
venboskraal, Witelskloof, on large Table Mountain
Sandstone boulder-outcrop, alt. 450-500 m (-BD), F.
Brusse 3074, 1981.05.02 (PRE, holo.). Figure 4.
Thallus subcrustose, saxicolous, up to 25 mm across.
Lobes elongate, 0, 1-0,3 mm broad, up to 1 mm long,
80-95 /zm thick. Upper surface dark brown, glossy,
non-isidiate and non-sorediate. Upper cortex 7—10 /zm
thick, epicortex pored (Figure 5). Algal layer 15-35 /zm
thick, algae Trebouxia, 5-18 /zm diam. Medulla white,
20-45 /zm thick. Lower cortex paraplectenchymatous,
around 15 /zm thick, brown. Lower surface black. Rhi-
zines not well developed. Apothecia sessile, rare, up to
0,5 mm across. Hypothecium hyaline, 30-33 /zm thick,
paraplectenchymatous, cells 3, 5-7, 5 /zm diam. Sybhy-
menium 30-45 /zm thick. Hymenium hyaline, 50-60 /zm
high, J+ blue. Asci clavate, poricidal, tholus J+ blue
(Figure 6). Ascospores hyaline, monolocular, ellipsoid,
9,5-12,5 x 5, 0-6,0 /zm. Pycnidia not seen. Chemistry:
cortical substances absent, squamatic acid and an un-
identified substance (Table 1: princ.-l) in the medulla.
Parmelia princeps is another brown lichen that is not
assignable to Protoparmelia Choisy, presently used for
the Lecanora badia group, due to important structural
differences (see the discussion of the previous species for
these). The cortex of this species does not react with
concentrated nitric acid (nor with 2 molar potassium hy-
droxide solution), but could probably still be assigned to
the Neofuscae, as some members of this group are nega-
tive with concentrated nitric acid (Esslinger 1977). The
only other subcrustose species containing squamatic acid
is Parmelia squamatica Brusse (1980, 1986) but this is
yellow-green coloured, with usnic acid in the upper cor-
tex.
Parmelia princeps is presently known only from the
type locality south-west of Clanwilliam.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author is grateful to Mrs S. M. Perold for assis-
tance with the Scanning Electron Micrographs, Mrs A.
J. Romanowski for the photographs and Mrs E. L. Bun-
ton for the typing.
REFERENCES
BRUSSE, F. A. 1980. A taxonomic and geographic study of the genus
Xanthoparmelia in the Karoo. M.Sc. thesis. University of the
Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
FIGURE 6. — Parmelia princeps, ascus and
paraphysis. Brusse 3074, holotype. Bar
= 10 pm.
BRUSSE, F. A. 1986. Four new effigurate-crustose species of Parme-
lia (Lichenes, Parmeliaceae) from southern Africa. Mycotaxon
27: 237-245.
CULBERSON, C. F. 1972. Improved conditions and new data for the
identification of lichen products by a standardized thin-layer chro-
matographic method. Journal of Chromatography 72: 113-125.
ESSLINGER, T. L. 1977. A chemosystematic revision of the brown
Parmeliae. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory. 42:
1-211.
HAFELLNER, J. 1984. Studien in Richtung einer naturlicheren
Gliederung der Sammelfamilien Lecanoraceae und Lecideaceae.
Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia 79: 24 1-37 1 .
Bothalia 17,1: 29-43(1987)
Notes on African plants
VARIOUS AUTHORS
ASCLEPIADACEAE
NOTES ON ASCLEPIAS D1PLOGLOSSA , A . COGNAT A AND A. FLAV A
A.jlava N.E.Br. and A. cognata N.E.Br. have in the
past been erroneously considered conspecific with A.
diploglossa (Turcz.) Druce. Although allied, these three
taxa are morphologically distinct.
South African herbaria have, for some years, treated
A.jlava N. E. Br. and A. cognata N.E.Br. as synonyms
of the older A. diploglossa (Turcz.) Druce. This is due to
the misinterpretation of a letter sent from Kew to the
Botanical Research Institute in 1963. Marais, who was
then the South African Liaison Officer at Kew, mentions
in this letter that ‘Mr Bullock regards both A. flava
N.E.Br. and A. cognata N.E.Br. as conspecific with A.
diploglossa' . He does, however, state earlier in the same
letter ‘As far as I know A. flava N.E.Br. has not been
sunk under A. diploglossa’ . This was, and still is the
case as Bullock did not publish his opinions. Despite
Marais’s warning that these reductions to synonomy
were not validly published, Bullock’s suggestions were
unfortunately followed and to all intents and purposes A
flava and A. cognata became synonyms under A. diplog-
lossa. This situation has recently been rectified in Gibbs
Russell et al. (1984) and further details are given here.
Although vegetatively similar, close examination
shows all three species to be distinct taxonomic entities
with very different floral morphologies (Figures 1 & 2;
Table 1).
KEY TO ASCLEPIAS DIPLOGLOSSA AND ITS ALLIES
la Proximal corona lobe appendages projecting over style apex A. cognata
lb Proximal corona lobe appendages not projecting over style apex:
2a Corona lobes with arm-like proximal appendages crossing over each other and reflexing back into coronal
sinus, appendages are below style apex and level with anther-wings A. flava
2b Corona lobes without true proximal appendages, proximal ends of corona forming dentate to obtuse
(but protruding) shoulders level with top of style apex A. diploglossa
Representative specimens
Asclepias diploglossa (Turcz.) Druce
NATAL. — 2730 (Vryheid): Wakkerstroom (-AD), Devenish 759
(NH, PRE). 2828 (Bethlehem): Royal Natal Park (-DB), Acocks &
Hafstrom 1 1205 (PRE). 2829 (Harrismith): Van Reenen (-AD), Wood
11205 (PRE). 2929 (Underberg): Giants’ Castle (-AB), Symons 188
(PRE); Highmoor State Forest (-BC), Killick & Vahrmeijer 3583
(PRE); Sam Pass (-CB), Lugillies 109 (NU); Bushman’s Nek (-CC),
Killick & Vahrmeijer 3969 (PRE); Garden Castle Nature Reserve
(-CD), Hilliard & Burn 7866 (NU); Mpendle (-DB), Moll 1481
(PRE); Glengariff (-DD), Rennie 488 (NU). 2930 (Pietermaritzburg):
Greytown (-BA), Wylie s.n. (NH 21644); Inanda (-DB), Groom s.n.
(NH4106).
TRANSKEL— 3028 (Matatiele): Ramatseliso’s Gate (-BB), Board-
man 186 (PRE).
CAPE. — 3227 (Stutterheim): Hogsback (-CA), Compton 1421
(NBG); Dohne Hill (— CB), Sim 1237 (SAM). 3326 (Grahamstown):
near Grahamstown (-BC), Glass 1503 (SAM).
Asclepias flava N.E.Br.
NATAL. — 2929 (Underberg): Underberg (-CD), Dyer 3744 (NH);
Sunset (-DA), Rennie 275 (NU); Mpendle (-DB), Huntley 625 (NH);
Nkonzo State Forest (-DD), Nicholas & Norris 1159 (CPF, NH,
PRE). 2930 (Pietermaritzburg): Howick (-AC). Haygarth s.n. (SAM
8378)\ Blinkwater Range (-AD), Nicholas 1019 (NU); Zwaartkop
(-CB), Wood 11219 (SAM); Byrne (-CC), Stewart 2023 (NU); Dargle
(-DB), Nicholas & George 1040 (CPF, K, MO, NH, NU). 3030 (Port
Shepstone): Ixopo (-AA), Shirley s.n. (NU).
TRANSKEL— 3029 (Kokstad): Mt Cume (-AD), Tyson 1686
(BOL, PRE); Malowe (-BD), Tyson 1086 (BOL, SAM); Vaal Bank
(-CB), Haygarth s.n. (NH 4230)', Ngeli Forest (-DA), Coleman 813
(PRE); Fort Donald (-DC), Tyson 1660 (SAM). 3128 (Umtata): Bazija
(— CB), Baur 556 (SAM).
CAPE.— 3326 (Grahamstown): Grahamstown (-BC), Glass 1503
(NBG).
Asclepias cognata N.E.Br.
NATAL. — 2929 (Underberg): Fort Nottingham (-BD), Hilliard &
Burn 9056 (NU); Bamboo Mountain (-CB), Grice s.n. (NU); Garden
Castle Nature Reserve (-CD), Hilliard & Burn 13767 (NU); Mpendle
(-DB), Hilliard & Burn 13856 (NU).
TRANSKEL — 3029 (Kokstad): Ensikeni (-BA), Haygarth s.n. (NH
15735); Mount Insizwa (-CD), Schlechter 6496 (BOL, NH); Ngeli
Mountain (-DA), Hilliard & Burn 5769 (NH, NU).
CONCLUSIONS
A. flava and A. cognata have never been validly re-
duced to synonomy under A. diploglossa and are, as
outlined by Brown (1908), distinct species allied to, but
separable from A. diploglossa.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank the Director and staff of the
following herbaria: BOL, CPF, GRA, J, K, NBG, NH,
NU, P, PRE, RUH, SAM and TCD for the loan of her-
barium specimens; the Head and staff of the Department
30
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
FIGURE l.—- Comparison of flower (1) and corona lobe (2) of Asclepias species. Structure in: la, A. cognata, x 10, Hilliard & Burn 9056 (NU); lb,
A. diploglossa, x 20, Boardman A 1 1 (PRE); lc, A. flava, x 19, Coleman 813 (PRE); 2a, A. cognata, x 17, Hilliard & Burn 9056 (NU); 2b, A.
diploglossa, x 28, Boardman All (PRE); 2c, A. flava, x 38, Coleman 813 (PRE).
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
31
TABLE 1. — A comparison of Asclepias cognata, A. diploglossa and A. flava. All measures in mm
FIGURE 2. A comparison of corona lobe variation. I, Asclepias cognata: a, Hilliard & Burtt 5769 (NH); b, Haygarih s.n. (NH 13661 ); c .Hilliard
& Burtt 13452 (NU); d, Hilliard & Burtt 13767 (NU); e, Haygarth s.n. (NH 15735); f, Hilliard & Burtt 13856 (NU). 2, A. diploglossa: a, Grice
s.n. (NU); b, Wylie s.n. (NH 21644); c, Devenish 759 (PRE); d, Rennie 488 (NU);e, Wood 11205 (PRE); f, Barker 1421 (NBG). 3, A. flava: a,
Hilliard & Burtt 5839 (NU); b, Baur556 (SAM); c, Glass 1503 (NBG); d, Tyson 1660 (SAM); e, Tyson 1686 (BOL); f. Wood 11219 (SAM).
32
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
of Botany, University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg; and
the Director and staff of the Department of Environment
Affairs.
REFERENCES
BROWN, N. E. 1908. Asclepiadeae. In W. T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora
capensis 4,1: 687-688. Reeve, London.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G. E., GERMISHUIZEN, G., HERMAN, P.,
OLIVIER, P., PEROLD, S. M., REID, C., RETIEF, E.,
SMOOK, L., VAN ROOY, J., WELMAN, W. G. & GON-
SALVES, P. 1984. List of species of southern African plants.
Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 48.
NICHOLAS, A. 1982. Taxonomic studies in Asclepias L. ( Asclepiada -
ceae) with particular reference to the narrow-leaved species in
southern Africa. M.Sc. thesis, University of Natal, Pietermaritz-
burg.
A. NICHOLAS
ERYSIPHACEAE
TWO NEW OIDIUM SPECIES FROM THE TRANSVAAL
In January 1985 an Oidium species was observed on
leaves of Dombeya rotundifolia (Hochst.) Planch, in the
garden of the Botanical Research Institute, Brummeria,
Pretoria. The fungus was observed until leaf drop but no
teleomorph was produced. The only previous report of
an Oidium sp. occurring on a Dombeya sp. is from Natal
in the Camperdown area of Pietermaritzburg, viz. on D.
cymosa Harv. (Doidge 1950). However, this fungus was
not described and, although the fungus on both Dombeya
species is likely to be the same, this cannot be stated for
certain. As no fresh material of the Natal fungus could be
obtained it is absolutely necessary to have a detailed
description of the Transvaal fungus available for future
comparison. The fungus from D. rotundifolia is there-
fore, described here in detail.
A few months later at the same venue an Oidium
species was observed on Lannea discolor (Sond.) Engl,
at the end of its growing season. Quite a number of
powdery mildew fungi have been observed on Anacar-
diaceae, the plant family to which Lannea spp. belong.
Apart from two Phyllactinia spp., one Uncinula sp., a
Sphaerotheca sp., two Erysiphe spp. and one Macro-
sphaera sp. which have been recorded (Hirata 1966),
two Oidium spp. have been described, viz. 0. anacardii
Noack (1898) and 0. mangiferae Berthet (1914).
Identity of our Oidium species with Sphaerotheca
macularis (Wallr. ex Fries) Magnus and Erysiphe cicho-
racearum DC. can be excluded immediately on account
of the solitary production of conidia in the Lannea fun-
gus, while Phyllactinia spp. do not have an Oidium
stage. Moreover, no imperfect stage has apparently been
observed for Uncinula verniciferae P. Henn. (Salmon
1905). Identity with Microsphaera alni (Wallr.) Winter,
Erysiphe communis (Wallr.) Link and Oidium mangife-
rae must also be excluded on account of the flexuous or
bent foot cells of the conidiophores. This leaves 0. ana-
cardii which has conidia similar in size and shape to the
Lannea fungus. However, its description by Noack
(1898) does not mention whether the foot cells of the
conidiophores are straight or flexuous. In addition the
presence or absence and shape of appressoria and fibro-
sin bodies is also not recorded. This and the apparent
absence of Oidium anacardii from the African continent,
as well as the fact that the Lannea fungus occurs on a
previously unrecorded host of powdery mildew, makes it
desirable to describe this fungus as a new species.
Oidium dombeyae Gorter & Eicker, sp. nov.
Mycelium superficiale, albidum, effusum. Hyphae
hyalinae, subflexuosae, aliquando geniculatae. Cellulae
hypharum, 35-45 x 4-5 /xm. Appressoria non lobata
vel moderate lobata. Conidiophora cylindracea (70—)
90—1 15(— 130) x 7,5-10 /am, plerumque 2-septata. Cel-
lulae basales rectae, comparate longae, (50— )65— 90
(-110) x 7,5-10 pm; cellulae sequentes breviores,
(7,5— )12,5(— 17,5) x 7,5-10 gm. Conidia ovoidea, soli-
taria, (22,5-)27,5-30(-35) x (15-)17,5(-20) pm. Cor-
puscula fibrosina conspicue desunt. Ratio longitudinis
/latitudinis conidiorum circa 1,6. Tubi germinationis,
apicales vel subapicales, plerumque perbreves, interdum
autem longiores, 12,5-125 x 2, 5-5,0 pm, saepe in
appressorium non lobatum vel modice lobatum (7,5-15
x 5, 0-7, 5 pm) terminantes.
Habitat in foliis vivis Dombeyae rotundifoliae
(Hochst.) Planch., Brummeria, Pretoria. Ianuarius 1985,
PREM No. 47848.
Mycelium superficial, white, thinly spread. Hyphae
hyaline, slightly flexuous, sometimes geniculate. Hy-
phal cells, 35—45 x 4-5 pm. Appressoria unlobed or
moderately lobed. Conidiophores cylindrical, (70-)
90—1 15(— 1 30) x 7,5-10 pm, usually 2-septate. Foot
cells straight, comparatively long, (50— )65— 90(— 1 10) x
7,5-10 pm, followed by one or more shorter cells
(7,5— )12,5(— 17,5) x 7,5-10 pm. Conidia singly pro-
duced, ovoid, (22 ,5-)27 ,5-30(-35) x (15-)17*5(-20)
pm; length/width ratio ± 1,6. Germ tubes near end of
conidia, apical or subapical, usually very short but some-
times longer, 12,5-125 x 5, 0-7, 5 /am, often ending in
an unlobed or moderately lobed appressorium (7,5-15 x
5,0-7, 5 pm).
On leaves of Dombeya rotundifolia (Hochst.) Planch.,
Pretoria Botanical Garden, Brummeria. January 1985,
PREM No. 47848.
Oidium lanneae Gorter & Eicker, sp. nov.
Mycelium amphigenum, griseo-albidum, effusum vel
densum. Hyphae plus minus vae rectae, aliquando
flexuosae vel geniculatae, rectangulariter ramificatae
saepe prope septum. Cellulae hypharum (37,5-)50-60
(-70) x 5, 0-6, 2 pm. Appressoria moderate lobata vel
multilobata, aliquando binatim opposita. Conidiophora
numerosa, brevia, (l-)3(-4)-cellularia (30-)50-75
(-110) x (7,5— )8,7— 1 1 ,2 pm, saepe ab basi ad apicem
leviter dilatescentia. Cellulae basales geniculatae,
flexuosae vel curvatae, raro rectae, (25— )35— 55(— 90) x
7,5-10 pm. Conidia solitaria, ellipsoidea vel oblonga,
utrinque obtuse rotundata, (25— )30— 35(^40) x
( 1 3,7—) 1 5— 1 7 ,5(— 20) pm. Ratio longitudinis/latitudinis
conidiorum circa 2. Corpuscula fibrosina conspicue
desunt. Tubi germinationis prope apicem orientes, inter-
dum apicales, circa recti, 50-75 x 3^J pm, saepe in
appressorium non lobatum vel modice lobatum 5, 0-7, 5
pm latum terminantes. Aliquando tubi perbreves rema-
nentes ac in appressorium multilobatum terminantes.
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
33
Habitat in foliis vivis Lanneae discoloris (Sond.)
Engl., Brummeria, Pretoria. Maius 1985, PREM Nos.
47877, 47974.
Mycelium amphigenous, greyish white, effuse to
dense. Hyphae more or less straight, occasionally
flexuous or geniculate, branching at right angles often
near a septum. Hyphal cells (37,5-)50-60(-70) x 5-6,2
pm. Appressoria moderately lobed or multilobed, some-
times opposite in pairs. Conidiophores numerous, short,
( 1— )3(— 4)-celled , (30-)50-75(-l 10) x (7,5-)8,7-l 1 ,2
pm, often slightly widening from base to top. Foot cells
geniculate, flexuous or bent, seldom straight, (25— )35
— 55(— 90) x 7,5-10 pm. Conidia singly produced, ellip-
soid to oblong, obtusely rounded at both ends,
(25— )30— 3 5 (—40) x (13,7)15-17,5(-20) pm\ length/
width ratio ± 2. No well developed fibrosin bodies are
present. Germ tubes originate near end of conidia,
usually apically, nearly straight, 50-75 x 3-4 pm, often
ending in an unlobed or moderately lobed appressorium,
5, 0-7, 5 pm wide; tubes sometimes remain very short,
ending in a multilobed appressorium.
On leaves of Lannea discolor (Sond.) Engl., Pretoria
Botanical Garden, Brummeria. May 1985. PREM Nos.
47877,47974.
Although referring and describing imperfect forms of
ectophytic powdery mildews to the form genus Oidium
does not find favour with some mycologists it is a
necessary procedure in tropical and subtropical regions
of the world where the teleomorph of many mildew fungi
is seldom produced (Doidge 1915; Hansford 1946) and
where powdery mildews in most cases can only be iden-
tified on the basis of anamorphic characters (Clare 1964;
Boesewinkel 1977; Hammett 1977).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Financial support from the Department of Agriculture
and Water Supply and the University of Pretoria is grate-
fully acknowledged.
REFERENCES
BERTHET, J. A. 1914. Molestia da mangueira. Boletim de agricul-
tura. Sao Paulo 15: 818-819.
BOESEWINKEL, H. J. 1977. Identification of Erysiphaceae by coni-
dial characters. Revue de mycologie 41: 493-507.
CLARE, B. G. 1964. Erysiphaceae of south-eastern Queensland.
Papers from the Department of Botany, University of Queensland
4, 10-11: 111-114.
DOIDGE, ETHEL M. 1915. Some notes on the South African Erysi-
phaceae. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 5:
237-245.
DOIDGE, ETHEL M. 1950. The South African fungi and lichens to
the end of 1945. Bothalia 5: 1-1094.
HAMMETT, K. R. W. 1977. Taxonomy of Erysiphaceae in New
Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany 15: 687-711.
HANSFORD, C. G. 1946. The foliicolous ascomycetes, their parasites
and associated fungi. Mycological Papers 15: 1-240.
HIRATA, K. 1966. Host range and geographical distribution of the
powdery mildews. Mimeographed edn. Faculty of Agriculture,
Niigata University, Niigata.
NOACK, F. 1898. Congumelos parasitas das plantas di pomar, horta e
jardim. Boletim do Instituto agronomico do Estado de Sao Paulo
9: 75-88.
SALMON, E.S. 1905. The Erysiphaceae of Japan, H. Annales mycolo-
gici 3: 241-256.
G. J. M. A. GORTER* AND A. EICKER*
* Botany Department, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002.
FABACEAE
A NEW SPECIES OF INDIGOFERA FROM NATAL AND TRANSKEI
Indigofera rubroglandulosa Germishuizen, sp.
nov., I. hilaris Eckl. & Zeyh. similis sed dense tecta
pilis glandulosis, etiam lobis calycis longioribus, foliolis
latioribus atque caudice globoso tuberoso differt.
TYPE.— Natal, 3030 (Port Shepstone): Margate
(-CD), Strey 10990 (PRE, holo.!; NH, iso. !). Figure 3.
Small erect to semi-erect herb up to 0,3 m tall arising
from a woody base; rootstock tuberous, globose. Stems
reddish brown, longitudinally ridged, with scattered
biramous hairs densely interspersed with red glandular
hairs or occasionally with only few scattered biramous
hairs. Stipules free, adnate to base of petiole, up to 7 mm
long, glandular on outside, glabrous inside. Leaves regu-
lar, paripinnate, petiolate. Leaflets 3-7 , obovate to nar-
rowly elliptic to oblanceolate, (7—) 1 2,5—17 (—20) x
(3,5— )5— 9(— 1 1) mm, stiffly mucronate at apex, obtuse at
base, strigillose on both surfaces with biramous hairs,
red glandular-hairy on lower surface only and along mar-
gins. Petiole up to 4 mm long. Inflorescence axillary,
racemose, 4-10-flowered, up to 40 mm long, including a
10-20 mm long peduncle, covered with both biramous
and red glandular hairs. Flowers deep pink to red, 8-9
mm long, each subtended by a lanceolate caducous bract
2-3 mm long. Calyx: tube 2 mm long, lobes 3,5- 6 mm
long, glabrous inside, outside with both biramous and
glandular hairs. Standard 7-9 x 5-7,5 mm, broadly
ovate, narrowing to base, mucronate at apex, strigose
outside, glabrous inside. Wing petals 8x2 mm. Keel
blades 8-9 x 2-2,5 mm, prominently pocketed; pockets
more or less triangular, up to 2 mm long. Style 7 mm
long, upcurved for about 2 mm, white-strigose for two-
thirds of its length; stigma capitate. Stamens 5-7 mm
long; 9 fused into a staminal sheath and the 1 vexillar
stamen free; anthers uniform, 1 mm long, strongly api-
culate; apiculum up to 0,5 mm long. Fruit a cylindrical
pod, 20-25 mm long, up to 3 mm in diameter, reddish
brown, white-strigose interspersed with red glandular
hairs. Seeds 1 ,5 mm long and wide.
34
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
NATM5E HERBARIUM DURBAN
FIGURE 3. — Holotype of Indigofera
rubroglandulosa Germishuizen
(Strey 10990).
FIGURE 4. — Distribution of Indigofera rubroglandulosa.
Location 5 (-CD), Strey 8729 ; Uvongo (-CD), Stirton 8057. 3130
(Port Edward): Beacon Hill (-AA), Strey 65 10.
TRANSKEI. — 3129 (Port St Johns): Mkambati Game Reserve
(-BD), Shackelton 89\ 5 km from Mkambati on road to Mtontsasa
(-BD), Van Wyk 1531\ Mkambati Leper Institute, along road from
hospital to office (-BD), Marais 1170\ 3 km from Mkambati hospital
(-BD), Venter 829.
I. rubroglandulosa is found in Natal and Transkei
(Figure 4) in grassland recently burnt. The first record of
the species in the PRE Herbarium was collected by
H. W. Bellmarley s.n. (PRE 58841), during July 1927
from Melmoth. It flowers in late winter to early summer.
All the material cited above was incorrectly identified as
I. hilaris or as Indigofera species. Although the distribu-
tion areas of I. hilaris and I. rubroglandulosa overlap,
the latter can be distinguished from the former by its
longer calyx lobes, wider leaflets and the red glandular
hairs. With the aid of a scatter diagram (Figure 5) using
calyx length along one axis and width of leaflets along
the other axis, /. hilaris and I. rubroglandulosa are read-
ily separated.
NATAL. — 2831 (Nkandla): 6 km south of Mtonjaneni on road to
Melmoth (-AD), Codd 1803\ Melmoth (-CB), Bellmarley s.n. 2930
(Pietermaritzburg): Camperdown (-DA), Moll 1886. 3030 (Port
Shepstone): Oribi Gorge, ‘Fairacres’ (-CB), Van Wyk 5127\ Umtam-
vuna Nature Reserve (-CC), Abbott 223 ; Izingolweni-Port Edward
road (-CC), Ward 185\ Margate (-CD), Strey 10990 ; Uvongo Bantu
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank Dr H. F. Glen for translating the
diagnosis into Latin.
G. GERMISHUIZEN
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
35
A I r ub ro g I and u los a
A
▲ I hilaris
A
A
A
6-
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
FIGURE 5. — Scatter diagram of
calyx length and leaflet width of
2 3 o 5 6 7 e mm Indigofera rubroglandulosa and
CALYX LENGTH /. kUdriS.
LICHINACEAE
A NEW SPECIES OF GONOHYMENIA FROM ETOSHA PAN LIMESTONE
Gonohymenia etoshica Brusse, sp. nov.
Thallus peltatus, calcicola, usque ad 3 mm diametro,
madefactus 240-320 pm crassus, homoeomerus. Pagina
superior carbo-atra, hebetata, undulata vel cerebrifor-
mis, ambitu breve lobata. Pagina inferior carbo-atra,
hebetata, laevis vel grosse et radiatim plicata. Apothecia
immersa vel substipitata, lecanorina, thallinocarpa,
usque ad 0,7 mm diametro. Excipulum thallinum in late-
ribus 70-150 pm crassum. Excipulum hyalinum, J-,
8-12 pm crassum, periclinate plectenchymatum, in late-
ribus destitutum. Hymenium hyalinum, in dimidio
superiori cum algis inspersum, 70 pm altum, J+ caeru-
leum. Hypothecium tenue, fere nullum. Paraphyses gra-
ciles, simplices vel leviter ramosae (in regionibus alga-
rum bene ramosae), luminibus 0, 8-1,0 pm crassis, sep-
tatae, gelatinosae, gelatina J+ caerulea. Asci obclavati,
8-, 12- vel 16-spori, parietibus omnibus tenuibus, J— ,
25-40 X 9-14 pm. Ascosporae hyalinae, ellipsoideae,
6-7 x 3 ,5 — 4,5 pm, simplices. Pycnidia globosa, hya-
lina, circa 50 pm diametro. Spermatia bacillaria,
2,8-3 ,6 x 0, 8-1,0 pm.
TYPE. — 1916 (Gobaub): Etosha Pan, 28 km from
Halali to Okaukuejo, Salvadora, on littoral limestone
outcrops — gentle N slope (-AB), Brusse 4155,
1984.03. 19 (PRE, holo.; LD, iso.). Figure 6.
Thallus peltate, on limestone, up to 3 mm diam.,
homoeomerous, 240-320 pm thick when wet (Figure 7).
Upper surface charcoal, matt, undulate to cerebriform-
wrinkled, simple to shortly lobate at margins. Lower
surface charcoal, matt, smooth to coarsely radiate pli-
cate. Apothecia (Figure 8) immersed to substipitate,
lecanorine, thallinocarpous, up to 0,7 mm diam. Thai-
line exciple 70-150 pm thick on sides. Exciple hyaline,
J-, 8—12 pm thick, dense periclinal plectenchyma,
absent from margins (Figure 8). Hymenium hyaline,
inspersed with algae in upper half, 70/xm high, J+ blue.
Hypothecium thin, almost absent. Paraphyses slender,
simple or lightly branched (well branched in algal areas),
lumens 0,8—1 ,0 pm thick, septate, gelatinized, gel J+
blue. Asci obclavate, 8-, 12- or 16-spored, walls thin,
J— (Figure 9), 25-40 X 9-14 pm. Asco spores hyaline,
ellipsoid, 6-7 x 3,5— 4,5 pm, simple. Pycnidia hyaline,
globose, about 50 /am diam. Spermatia hyaline rods,
2, 8-3, 6 x 0, 8-1,0 pm.
This new species is most similar to the European
species, Gonohymenia nummularia (Nyl.) Henss., but
has smaller and fewer ascospores per ascus.
The number of algae in the upper half of the hyme-
nium seems to vary considerably. Sometimes algae are
quite scarce, e.g. in the specimen cited below, but the
type is rich in hymenial algae. The asci of this species
are obclavate with acute apices and with thin walls (no
tholus development). However the hymenial gel is blue
in Lugol’s iodine solution. The asci containing 12 or 16
spores are larger than those containing only 8 asco-
spores, so that the ascospores from 8-spored asci are of
the same overall size as those from 16-spored asci. It is
36
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
FIGURE 6. — Gonohymenia etoshica
Brusse, habit. Brusse 4155, ho-
lotype. Scale in mm.
V % 88 **>
5* ' »
7i* '
* S»
«» V/
**
• * '
if •*" , . ...
- - X
• W >:.8H fji' . «■■
*•■.' ■ » <-% iff* . A.-& '
%*
. #
; a*/
«# *»a
4 «* %»
*» * ■
v&
**>» ■
>4,
.7 ? ■"
'0k
*
FIGURE 7. — Gonohymenia etoshica
Brusse, edge of lobe section in
lactophenol cotton-blue, show-
ing undifferentiated hyphae an-
ticlinal to the surface, and algal
cells concentrated near the sur-
face. Brusse 4155, holotype.
Bar = 100 /urn.
FIGURE 8. — Gonohymenia etoshica
Brusse, part of an immersed
apothecium in section in lacto-
phenol cotton-blue. Brusse
4155, holotype. Bar =100 /urn.
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
37
FIGURE 9. — Gonohymenia etoshica Brusse, ascus
and paraphyses. Brusse 4155, holotype. Bar =
10 pm.
interesting that the exciple terminates before reaching the
flanks of the hymenium (Figure 8), and probably allows
for intrusion of alga-bearing thalline tissue into the
hymenium, during development.
Several new combinations in this genus were made by
Henssen (1980), where good photographs of some
species are given. Poelt (1969) treated the European
species, some under Thyrea, in key form.
At present this species is known from two localities on
the edge of Etosha Pan, on limestone.
SWA/NAMIBIA. — 1816 (Namutoni): Etosha Pan, 8 km N of
Namutoni, on Pan’s Edge road, on limestone on W rise (-DD), F .
Brusse 4177, 1984.03.20 (PRE, LD).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author is grateful to game rangers Karen and Tre-
vor Nott for company during a stay at Etosha Pan, and to
Otavi Tsumeb for armed protection against dangerous
wild animals.
REFERENCES
HENSSEN, A. 1980. Problematik der Gattungsbegrenzung bei den
Lichinaceen. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 92:
483-506.
POELT, J. 1969. Bestimmungsschliissel europaischer Flechten.
Cramer, Lehre.
F. BRUSSE
A NEW SPECIES OF THYREA FROM OTAVI DOLOMITE (DAMARA SYSTEM)
Thyrea otaviana Brusse, sp. nov.
Thallus subfruticosus, e haptero radiatim lobatus, in
sicco usque ad 18 mm diametro, dolomiticola. Lobi
subascendentes, lineares, simplices vel ramosi, usque ad
10 mm longi et 0,4-1 ,5 (-2,5) mm lati, madefacti
400-600 pm crassi. Pagina superior carbo-atra, hebe-
tata vel granulate-isidiosa, laevis. Cortex 5-15 pm cras-
sus, paraplectenchymatus, cellulis 3, 5^4, 5 pm dia-
metro. Stratum gonidiale 20-50 pm crassum; algae
cyanescentes (Chroococcales aut Pleurocapsales).
FIGURE 10. — Thyrea otaviana
Brusse, habit. Brusse 4163, ho-
lotype. Scale in mm.
38
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
Medulla hyalina, 390-560 pm crassa; hyphae in reticu-
lum regulare dispositae, 1,4-2, 5 pm crassae. Pagina
inferior carbo-atra, hebetata, laevis, in sicco canalicu-
lata. Apothecia laminalia, sessilia, lecanorina, in sicco
usque ad 0,5 mm diametro. Pagina hymeniorum badia,
nitida. Excipulum thallinum in lateribus 80-150 pm
crassum. Excipulum hyalinum, periclinate prosoplecten-
chymatum, 15-20 pm crassum, J— . Hypothecium hyali-
num, 40-50 pm crassum, J+ caeruleum, paraplecten-
chymatum, cellulis 2, 5—4,0 pm diametro. Hymenium
hyalinum, 70-100 pm altum, J+ caeruleum. Para-
physes ramosae et anastomosae, septatae, luminibus
1,5-1 ,7 pm crassis, gelatinosae, gelatina J+ caerulea.
Asci clavati, cum parietibus tenuibus, J— . Ascosporae
hyalinae, simplices, ovales, octonae, 11-17 x 8, 0-9, 5
pm. Pycnidia non visa.
TYPE. — 1916 (Gobaub): Etosha Pan, Halali Hill, on
S faces of dolomite outcrops on a SE slope (-AB),
Brusse 4163, 1984.03.19 (PRE, holo.; BM, COLO, LD,
MB, iso.). Figure 10.
Thallus subfruticose, radiately lobate from a central
holdfast, up to 18 mm across when dry, on dolomite.
Lobes subascending, linear, simple to branched, up to 10
mm long and 0,4-1 ,5 (-2,5) mm wide when dry,
400-600 pm thick when wet. Upper surface charcoal,
matt to granular-isidiate, smooth. Cortex 5-15 pm thick,
small-celled paraplectenchymatous, cells 3,5^4,5 /t,m
diam. (Figure 11). Algal layer 20-50 pm thick; algae
blue-green (Chroococcales or Pleurocapsales). Medulla
FIGURE 11. — Thyrea otaviana Brusse, thin section of cortex in lacto-
phenol cotton-blue. Brusse 4163, holotype. Bar = 100 /jl m.
FIGURE 12. — Thyrea otaviana Brusse, thickish section in lactophenol cotton-blue showing reticulated medulla. Brusse 4163, holotype. Bar
= 100 gm.
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
39
FIGURE 13. — Thyrea otaviana
Brusse, section of apothecium
in lactophenol cotton-blue. Ar-
row indicates a sectioned isi-
dium. Brusse 4163, holotype.
Bar = 100 /im.
hyaline, 390-560 pm thick; hyphae reticulately arranged
(Figure 12), 1,4-2, 5 gm thick. Lower surface charcoal,
matt, smooth, canaliculate when dry. Apothecia (Figure
13) laminal, sessile, lecanorine, up to 0,5 mm (dry).
Hymenial surface brown, nitid. Thalline exciple 80-150
pm thick on sides. Exciple hyaline, periclinal prosoplec-
tenchyma, 15-20 pm thick, J-. Hypothecium hyaline,
40-50 pm thick, J+ blue, small-celled paraplecten-
chyma, cells 2, 5^,0 pm diam. Hymenium hyaline,
70-100 pm high, J+ blue. Paraphyses branched and
anastomosed, septate, lumens 1,5-1, 7 pm thick, gelati-
nized, gel J+ blue. Asci 8-spored, clavate, walls thin,
J- (Figure 14). Ascospores hyaline, monolocular, oval,
11-17 x 8, 0-9, 5 pm. Pycnidia not seen.
Two new species of this genus have recently been
described from Africa (Henssen 1986; Henssen, Biidel &
Wessels 1985), but these, like the other species of Thy-
rea (Henssen 1980; Poelt 1969; Zahlbruckner 1926),
lack a cortex, the outer surface terminating in relatively
undifferentiated hyphae. Thyrea otaviana displays a
weakly developed cortex with the hyphae becoming
swollen and conglutinate near the surface, so that it is
anticlinally paraplectenchymatous (Figure 11). The new
species is therefore the most highly evolved species of
this genus known to date (at least as far as thalline mor-
phology is concerned). The medullary hyphae are fas-
cicled or drawn together at regular intervals to give a
reticulate pattern (Figure 12) as in T. rotundata Biidel et
al. (Henssen, Biidel & Wessels 1985).
The ascospores of this new species are also larger than
any known lobate (as opposed to peltate) Thyrea, reach-
ing 17 gm long in a small sample of eight ascospores
measured.
The new species is presently known only from the
type locality, Halali Hill, Etosha Pan on dolomite on a
south-east facing slope, in the partial shade of Moringa
ovalifolia trees. Halali hill is composed of dolomite of
the Otavi group of the Damara geological sequence, and
the specific name alludes to this fact. The lichen is pro-
bably more widespread on dolomite in the northern part
of South West Africa/Namibia.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author is grateful to game rangers Karen and
Trevor Nott for company during a visit to Etosha Pan and
to game ranger/tracker Otavi Tsumeb for armed protec-
tion against large carnivorous and other dangerous ani-
mals.
FIGURE 14. — Thyrea otaviana Brusse,
ascus and paraphyses. Brusse 4163, ho-
lotype. Bar = 10/j.m.
40
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
REFERENCES
HENSSEN, A. 1980. Problematik der Gattungsbegrenzung bei den
Lichinaceen. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft
92: 483-506.
HENSSEN, A. 1986. Thyrea polyglossa and Thyrea divergens sp.
nov. My cotaxon 25: 493-503.
HENSSEN, A., BUDEL, B. & WESSELS, D. 1985. New or interest-
ing members of the Lichinaceae from southern Africa. 1. Species
from northern and eastern Transvaal. Mycotaxon 22: 169-195.
POELT, J. 1969. Bestimmungsschliissel europaischer Flechten.
Cramer, Lehre.
ZAHLBRUCKNER, A. 1926. Spezieller Teil. In A. Engler & K.
Prantl, Die Natiirlichen Pflanzenfamilien, edn 2, Vol. 8: 61-270.
Engelmann, Leipzig.
F. BRUSSE
POLYGONACEAE
A NEW SPECIES OF OXYGONUM FROM NATAL
Oxygonum robustum Germishuizen, sp. nov., O.
dregeano Meisn. affinis, sed ocrea setis longis rigidis,
habitu robusto decumbenti, foliisque nunquam pinnati-
sectis differt.
TYPE. — Natal, 2732 (Ubombo): east of Vazi Swamp,
Manzengwenya (-BB), Moll 4722 (PRE, holo.; NH,
iso.). Figure 15.
Robust, spreading, decumbent herb much branched
from the base; arising from a long thick vertical woody
rootstock. Old stems reddish brown, sparsely pilose;
young stems glabrous, longitudinally ridged, brown-
punctate. Ocrea membranous, reddish brown, 8-10 mm
long, fringed with rigid bristles 8-10 mm long, pilose,
brown-punctate, adnate to the base of the leaves. Leaves
simple, sessile, alternately arranged, glabrous, brown-
punctate, lamina obovate to elliptic to spathulate, (37-)
45-75 (-94) x (8-) 10-21 (-23) mm, acuminate, mar-
natal
NATAL!
-27 32 BA Ubombo
E.J. Moll
NATAISE HERBARIUM DURBAN
aftsl.; HtglO KfitJll
Oxygoniu
Edge of email vlei just e*8t of Vazi
Swamp, Manzengwenya. Graael nd.
White- flowered herb, fairly common.
FIGURE 15. — Holotype of Oxygo-
num robustum Germishuizen.
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
41
gins entire or occasionally sharply toothed. Inflorescence
a long lax thyrse with fascicles of up to 4 flowers in the
axils of the bracts. Flowers bisexual. Perianth 5-lobed,
up to 7 mm long, glabrous, white. Stamens 8, inserted
on the inner perianth; anthers reddish brown, 1 mm long;
filaments 4 mm long. Styles 3, connate at the base; stig-
mas capitate. Fruit a 3-angled nut.
NATAL. — 2632 (Bella Vista): Maputa to Kosi Nature Reserve
(-DD), Edwards 2586. 2732 (Ubombo): 16 km north of Lake Sibayi
(—BA), Vahrmeyer & Toelken 259', Muzi Swamp ± 2 km from Phelen-
daba turnoff on road to Mbazwana (-BA), Germishuizen 3546' Vazi
Swamp (-BB), Stephen, Van Graan & Schwabe 1177', east of Vazi
Swamp, Manzengwenya (-BB), Moll 4722; Mbazwana (-BC),
Gerstner 704; Manzengwenya Forest Station (-BD), Vorster 2586;
Bangazi Lake (-DA), Strey 4991. 2832 (Mtubatuba): 25 km north of
Mtubatuba (-AB), Codd 2022; near Fames Island Camp (-AB), Ward
1493; Dukuduku U176 (-AC), Strey 5522; St Lucia, Eastern Shore
State Forest (-AB), Nicholas 1624; Nseleni Nature Reserve (-CA),
Bourquin & Ndlovu 17; 80 km from Arboretum turnoff, on old main
road to Empangeni (-CC) Ngwenya 240; Richards Bay (-CC), Lawn
1725 & 1726; Rump s.n. (NH 20120).
0. robustum is endemic to Natal, occurring in a
restricted area (Figure 16) of coastal grassland and
coastal dune forest. The first record of the species in the
Natal Herbarium was collected by W. G. Rump s.n. (NH
20120) during July 1929 at Richards Bay. All the mate-
rial cited above was incorrectly identified as O. dregea-
num. Although these two taxa are sympatric, 0. robus-
tum can be distinguished from 0. dregeanum by its
robust and decumbent habit, by the ocrea fringe having
FIGURE 16. — Distribution of Oxygonum robustum Germishuizen.
long rigid bristles and by the leaves never being pinnati-
sect.
The specific epithet robustum refers to the robust habit
of this species.
G. GERMISHUIZEN
TELOSCHIST ACEAE
A NEW SPECIES OF CALOPLACA FROM SOUTHERN AFRICA
INTRODUCTION
The genus Caloplaca Th. Fr. is one of the largest
lichen genera known. The total number of species has
been estimated at almost 500 (Santesson 1970). Al-
though many of the published species names will be
reduced to synonyms in future revisions, there are still
unknown species to be discovered in this fascinating
genus. The genus is also extremely variable and incorpo-
rates many different structural forms, which, if measured
by today’s taxonomic concepts in, for example, the Leci-
deaceae or Parmeliaceae, would have been recognized at
generic level. However, too many intermediate forms
are present to justify a more diversified generic taxo-
nomy in the Teloschistaceae (see Hafellner & Poelt
1979; Poelt & Hafellner 1980; Poelt & Pelleter 1984;
Wunder 1974).
In addition many species show extremely broad mor-
phological variations, which normally also correlate with
rather extensive geographical ranges. In taxonomic
terms this variation is usually extremely hard to define.
Yet, many characteristic species with geographically
limited distributions are also present in the genus. The
new species described here belongs to this latter cate-
gory. I recognized the unique characteristics of the
species for the first time in undetermined material from
Lesotho. On a field trip in southern Africa with Mr Frank
Brusse at the beginning of 1986, we collected the new
species in several different localities along the Drakens-
berg escarpment. The species is named in honour of my
older colleague Dr Ove Almbom, who collected it as far
back as 1953.
Caloplaca almbornii Karnefelt, sp. nov.
Thallus areolis dispersis sanguineis 0,2-3 ,0 mm
diametro compositus. Apothecia immersa, postea parum
prominentia, lecideina; discus aurantiacus. Ascosporae
polaribiloculares, 9,5-13,5 x 3, 8-4, 7 /xm, septum ± 2
/z m crassum. Thallus K+ purpureus, parietinum adest.
TYPE. — Lesotho, 2929 (Underberg): Mokhotlong,
mountain behind Pack Horse Inn (-AC), 1963, Kofler
(LD, holo.).
Thallus composed of scattered, more or less circular,
usually convex areoles, 0, 2-1,0 mm across, or when
flatter up to 3,0 mm across, then secondarily cracked
into several small areoles; usually bright reddish or occa-
sionally more orange pigmented. Cortical layer ± 40-70
/xm thick, covered by a ± 10 /xm thick pigmented layer,
paraplectenchymatous, composed of anticlinal cells,
occasionally penetrating the clustered algae in up to 150
/xm deep strands. Photobiont clustered, occasionally
nearing the surface, single cells green and spherical, ±
10 /xm in diameter. Medullary layer rather dense,
130-350 /xm deep (Figure 17F). Apothecia often pre-
sent, immersed, becoming slightly raised with maturity,
42
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
FIGURE 17. — Caloplaca almbornii. A, specimen with very scattered areoles, Kdrnefelt 8626-7, bar = 10 mm; B & C, close up of thallus,
Kofler s.n., bar = 1 mm; D, cross section of areole showing immersed apothecium, Kdrnefelt 8625-20, bar = 100 /xm.; E, cross section
of areole with conidiomata, Kdrnefelt 8626-8, bar = 100 /xm.; F, cross section of areole, Kdrnefelt 8625-20, bar = 100 /xm.
often one per areole (Figure 17C & D), to several
together on the broader cracked areoles; disc very small,
0, 1-0,7 mm across, covered by an orange pigment.
Excipulum occasionally seen as a thin pale orange ring
around the disc, 10-20 /xm thick. Hymenium ± 65-95
/xm thick, covered by a pigmented, granular, epihyme-
nial layer up to 35 /xm thick. Asci 45-55 x 8-10 /xm.
Ascospores ellipsoidal, polaribilocular, 9,5-13,5 x
3, 8-5, 7 /xm; septum ± 2 /xm thick. Hypothecium form-
ing a relatively flat dome below the excipulum, 35-55
(-150) /xm deep, hyaline. Conidiomata scattered,
1 10-170 /xm large, pyriform (Figure 17E); conidia very
small, slightly bifusiform, ± 3,5 x 0,5 /xm. Reactions
K+ blood red, C— , KC— and P— . Caloplaca almbornii
contains parietin only (TLC).
Caloplaca almbornii is characterized particularly by
the remarkable structure of the thallus composed of scat-
tered convex areoles, forming small red-spotted patches
(Figure 17A, B & C). Apart from thallus colour and
structure of the ascomata, C. almbornii is reminiscent of
Aspicilia contorta (Hoffm.) Krempelh. which occurs on
various calcareous rocks in Europe. The areoles are often
embedded in other blackish, crustose, sterile lichens. It
is therefore not possible to demonstrate whether the
areoles are connected by anastomosing hyphae, or by a
thin hypothallus. Flatter and up to 3 mm broad areoles
can occasionally be found. The colour of the areoles is
sometimes more orange than bright reddish.
Caloplaca almbornii appears to be isolated in the
genus and is not clearly related to any other species. It
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
43
shows some affinities with the C. cinnabarina group,
which is a very variable species complex occurring
mainly at lower altitudes in southern Africa. C. almbor-
nii and the C. cinnabarina group have similar anatomical
characters but differ considerably in the structure of the
thallus. The bright reddish colour is most reminiscent of
the colour of C. haematodes (Massal.) Zahlbr. C. alm-
bomii also differs chemically by containing only parie-
tin, whereas most other species examined contain more
than one anthraquinone.
Caloplaca almbornii is endemic to southern Africa
and is known only from mountainous regions, mainly at
rather high altitudes. It has been found locally abundant
at 2 000-3 000 m in the Drakensberg in Lesotho, the
Transkei and Natal. Furthermore, it has been found in
the Orange Free State close to the Lesotho border, in the
easternmost part of the Cape Province and in the Matopo
Hills in SW Zimbabwe (Figure 18). The species could
probably occur in the eastern mountainous region of the
Transvaal, located between the northernmost outpost in
Zimbabwe and the Drakensberg centre in the south. I
have, however, not been able to find it during several
excursions, specially undertaken to this otherwise liche-
nologically very rich eastern extension of the Drakens-
berg. The eastern Transvaal mountains are presumably
too low in altitude.
FIGURE 18. — Distribution of Caloplaca almbornii.
In the Mont-aux-Sources region in the northern part of
the Drakensberg, I found C. almbornii locally abundant
on sloping dark basaltic rocks with dripping water. In the
southern part of the Drakensberg the species was also
found locally in the cave sandstone belt, growing on flat
surfaces with stagnant water, or on sloping surfaces with
dripping water. Most of these habitats are easily recog-
nized by the blackish colour caused by a variety of crus-
tose lichens and possibly also by Cyanobacteria. C. alm-
bornii is easily discovered here, where it contrasts as
patches of bright red spots against the dark rock surface.
ZIMBABWE. — 2028 (Bulawayo): Matopo Hills, Pomowe (-AC),
1963, Kofler (LD).
O.F.S.— 2828 (Bethlehem): Clarens (-CB), 1943, Plank 1880
(PRE).
NATAL. — 2828 (Bethlehem): Royal Natal National Park, mountain
path to Mont-aux-Sources from entrance gate at the end of mountain
road from Phuthaditjhaba (-DB), 1986, Kdrnefelt 8626-8, 8626-10,
8626-20, 8626-22, 2826-46 (LD); Little Tugela area (-DB), 1943,
Esterhuysen 8875 (BOL). 2829 (Harrismith): Cathedral Peak area,
Organ Pipes (-CC), 1953, Almborn 9037, 9058 (LD).
QWA-QWA. — 2828 (Bethlehem): Mont-aux-Sources area, moun-
tain path from entrance gate to Royal Natal National Park at the end of
mountain road from Phuthaditjhaba (-DB), 1986, Kdrnefelt 8625-8,
8625-12, 8625-14, 8625-15, 8625-20-8625-23 (LD).
LESOTHO. — 2927 (Maseru): Machache Mtn (-AD), 1929-1930,
Hewitt (TRH, 4 collections); Popanyane (-BB), 1963, Kofler 3523
(LD). 2828 (Bethlehem): Leribe, Oxbow (-CC), 1953, Kofler (LD, 2
collections); Mapoteng, 30 miles E of Leribe (-CC), 1963, Kofler
310195 (LD, 2 collections). 2929 (Underberg): Mokhotlong, behind
Pack Horse Inn (-AC), Kofler (LD, 2 collections).
TRANSKEI. — 3029 (Matatiele): Qachas Nek, close to the Lesotho
border, cave sandstone formations (-BB), 1986, Kdrnefelt 8630-
44-8630-51 (LD).
CAPE. — 3027 (Lady Grey): Naude’s Nek, on R396 to Rhodes from
Elands Height (-DB), 1986, Kdrnefelt 8632-3-8632-6 (LD); mountain
6 miles from Naude’s Nek, on the way to Ben McDhuy (-DB), 1963,
Kofler 311166. 3127 (Lady Frere): Barkly Pass on R58 between Barkly
Pass and Elliot (-BB), 1986, Kdrnefelt 8633-1-8633-3 (LD).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank Dr B. de Winter, Director of the
Botanical Research Institute, for his support in many
ways and Mr Frank Brusse, who accompanied me during
the field work along the Drakensberg escarpment.
REFERENCES
HAFELLNER, J. & POELT, J. 1979. Die Arten der Gattung Calo-
placa mit plurilocularen Sporen (Meroplacis, Triophthalmidium,
Xanthocarpia) . Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 46:
1—4 1 .
POELT, J. & HAFELLNER, J. 1980. Apatoplaca — genus novum
Teloschistacearum (Lichenes). Mitteilungen der Botanischen
Staatssammlung Munchen 16: 503-528.
POELT, J. & PELLETER, U. 1984. Zwergstrauchige Arten der Flech-
tengattung Caloplaca. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 148:
51-88.
SANTESSON, J. 1970. Antraquinones in Caloplaca. Phytochemistry
9: 2140-2166.
WUNDER, H. 1974. Schwarzfriichtige, saxicole Sippen der Gattung
Caloplaca (Lichenes, Teloschistaceae) in Mitteleuropa, mit dem
Mittelmeergebiet und Vorderasien. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 3:
1-186. Lehre.
I. KARNEFELT*
* Department of Systematic Botany, University of Lund, Ostra
Vallgatan 18, 223 61 Lund, Sweden.
Bothalia 17,1:45-49(1987)
Cetraria (Parmeliaceae) and some related genera on the African
continent
i. kArnefelt*
Keywords: Bryoria, Cetraria, new records, Parmeliaceae, Platismatia, southern Africa, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
Four species are reported new for the lichen flora of southern Africa: Bryoria fuscescens (Gyeln.) Brodo &
D. Hawksw., B. motykae (D. Hawksw.) Brodo & D. Hawksw., Cetraria chlorophylla (Humb.) Vain, and Platismatia
glauca (L.) Culb. & Culb. (Parmeliaceae), found at high elevations in Natal and south-west Cape. B. fuscescens, B.
motykae and P . glauca were previously known from a few localities, also at high elevations, in east Africa. The genus
Cetraria s. str. was previously unknown on the African continent.
UITTREKSEL
Vier spesies word nuut aangeteken vir die ligeen-flora van suidelike Afrika: Bryoria fuscescens (Gyeln.) Brodo & D.
Hawksw., B. motykae (D. Hawksw.) Brodo & D. Hawksw., Cetraria chlorophylla (Humb.) Vain, en Platismatia glauca
(L.) Culb. & Culb. (Parmeliaceae), wat hoog bo seespieel in Natal en suidwes-Kaap aangetref word. B . fuscescens, B.
motykae en P . glauca was voorheen bekend vanaf 'n paar plekke, ook hoog bo seespieel, in oos- Afrika. Die genus Cetraria
s. str. was voorheen onbekend op die vasteland van Afrika.
INTRODUCTION
During my work on the genera Coelocaulon and
Cornicularia (Kamefelt 1986), I came across a few note-
worthy specimens in the Bolus Herbarium, University of
Cape Town, collected by Ms Elsie Esterhuysen. Apart
from the material of Coelocaulon epiphorellum, which
was then new to Africa, Ms Esterhuysen’ s collections
also included four other species new to southern Africa:
Bryoria fuscescens (Gyeln.) Brodo & D. Hawksw., B.
motykae (D. Hawksw.) Brodo & D. Hawksw., Cetraria
chlorophylla (Humb.) Vain, and Platismatia glauca (L.)
Culb. & Culb. (Parmeliaceae). With the discovery of
Cetraria chlorophylla in southern Africa the genus
Cetraria s. str. is also reported as being new to the Afri-
can continent.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The material from southern Africa was investigated
chemically for secondary compounds and was compared
anatomically with material from the northern hemisphere
in LD, and with material from the east African moun-
tains in UPS.
Cetraria chlorophylla (Humb.) Vain, in Acta So-
cietatis pro Fauna et Flora Fennica 13: 7 (1896).
Lichen chlorophyllus Humb.: 20 (1793). Type: In cortice Pyni syl-
vestris beym Vorwerk Hals copiose (B, Willdenow).
Thallus subfruticose or foliose, ± 10-20 mm across;
lobes irregularly branched, ±0,5 mm broad at tips, ±
2-3 mm at base, weakly channelled to flat, with scat-
tered marginal soralia especially towards the lobe tips,
and scattered marginal cilia; upper surface brown to pale
brown, glossy, rather smooth; lower surface paler brown
to whitish, wrinkled or sulcate, with rather frequent pale
* Department of Systematic Botany, University of Lund, Ostra
Vallgatan 18, 223 61 Lund, Sweden.
rhizinae; ascomata and conidiomata not observed. Cor-
tex paraplectenchymatous, ± 25-30 p m thick, covered
by a thin ± 5 pm thick pigmented epicortical layer,
composed of 1-2 layers of densely packed isodiametric
cells with rather distinctive lumina; photobiont green and
spherical forming a more or less continuous layer;
medulla composed of loose hyphae; lower cortical layer
similar to the upper layer (Figure 1C). Reactions K— ,
C-, KC- and P— . Cetraria chlorophylla contains pro-
tolichesterinic acid.
Cetraria chlorophylla is characterized by the rather
small, subfruticose to foliose thallus, brown to usually
more greenish brown in the northern hemisphere, and
glossy lobes with scattered marginal soralia and cilia
(Figure 1A). It is a locally common species both on
conifers and on deciduous trees in north-western and
central Europe (see Wirth 1980). In western North
America it is also one of the most common foliose spec-
ies (Hale 1979; Thomson 1984). In continental parts of
Eurasia and North America, however, C. chlorophylla is
very rare or lacking, and relatively mild and oceanic
climatic regions provide conditions favourable for the
growth of this species. C. chlorophylla has also been
reported from Japan (Sato 1965) and from Tierra del
Fuego (Rasanen 1932) and Australia (Filson 1983) in the
southern hemisphere. The species was, however, not
treated by Galloway (1985) in the new lichen flora of
New Zealand.
The material from southern Africa was collected at
750-900 m alt. on shelves on the NE side of Table
Mountain in the SW Cape (Figures 2 & 3). This is not
surprising, as Table Mountain, with its mild and humid
winters and relatively high rainfall, offers favourable
conditions for a diversified lichen vegetation. It is one of
the richest lichen localities in southern Africa and is the
type locality of numerous lichen species.
It is premature to speculate on the origin and dispersal
of C. chlorophylla in the southern hemisphere and on the
46
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
FIGURE 1. — A, Cetraria chlorophylla, Esterhuysen 22911 , bar = 10 mm; B, Platismatia glauca, Esterhuysen 10261, bar = 10 mm; C,
C. chlorophylla, cross section of thallus, interference contrast micrograph, Esterhuysen 10261, bar 10 /xm; D, P. glauca, cross section of
thallus, light micrograph, Esterhuysen 10261 , bar = 10 /xm; E, Bryoria fuscescens, Esterhuysen 10261 , bar = 10 mm; F, B. motykae,
Esterhuysen 21356, bar = 10 mm.
only record yet known from southern Africa. I am not
inclined to believe, however, that the species has been
introduced in modem times, as it occurs at relatively
high elevations in a natural habitat (see Kamefelt 1986).
Presumably the species could occur in similar regions in
southern Africa with favourable climatic conditions,
such as the Drakensberg escarpment as well as at high
altitudes in the east African mountains.
CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): Table Mountain, cliffs, NE side, on
shelves, 2500-3000 ff (750-900 m] (-CD), 1954, Esterhuysen 22911
(BOL).
Platismatia glauca (L.) Culb. & Culb. in Contri-
butions from the United States National Herbarium 34:
530(1968).
Lichen glaucus L.: 1 148 (1753). Type: Europe, Linnean Herbarium
Sheet 1273-139 (LINN, lecto.).
Thallus foliose, loosely attached, 20-50 mm across;
lobes 5-10 mm broad; upper surface yellowish, with
dark brownish areas, reticulately wrinkled, with scat-
tered marginal soralia; lower surface dark brown, reticu-
lately wrinkled to pitted (Figure IB); ascomata and coni-
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
47
diomata not observed. Upper cortex prosoplectenchyma-
tous, 20-30 pm thick, composed of strongly pachyder-
matous cells with indistinct cell lumina; photobiont
green, spherical, concentrated near the upper cortex; me-
dulla loose, 50-100 (Lim thick; lower cortex similar to the
upper cortex, heavily pigmented (Figure ID). Reactions
K-, C— , KC- and P-. Platismatia glauca contains
caperatic acid and atranorin.
This well known species from the northern hemis-
phere has been described in detail by Culberson & Cul-
berson (1968). Platismatia glauca is locally common on
conifers and deciduous trees and occasionally also on
rocks in western Europe and North America. It is ex-
tremely common especially in the western American
states, but is found more rarely in the eastern provinces
(Hale 1979; Thomson 1984). Like C. chlorophylla, P.
glauca is apparently also favoured by a rather mild
oceanic climate.
In the southern hemisphere P. glauca is also known
from the south-westernmost part of South America (Cul-
berson & Culberson 1968) and from Australia (Filson
1983), but it is so far unknown from New Zealand (Gal-
loway 1985).
On the African continent P. glauca was previously
known from Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda (Figure 3),
where it occurs at rather high altitudes from 3 200-3 500
m (Krog & Swinscow 1975). The two new records from
southern Africa were found at ± 2 400 m in the Cathe-
dral Peak area in the Natal Drakensberg and at ± 1 800
m in the Sneeuberg in the Sederberg Mountains in the
western Cape (Figure 2). The scattered montane African
records may indicate that the localities represent the rem-
nants of a much wider pre-Pleistocene distribution.
FIGURE 2.— Distribution in southern Africa of: Cetraria chloro-
phylla, ■ ; Platismatia glauca, •; Bryoria fuscescens, O; B.
motykae, A .
NATAL. — 2829 (Harrismith): Cathedral Peak area, tree trunk, 8000
ft [2 500 m], (-CC), 1944, Esterhuysen 10261 (BOL).
CAPE.— 3218 (Clanwilliam): Sederberg, Sneeuberg, shaded ledge
on cliffs, south side, 6000 ft (1 800 m] (-DA), 1952, Esterhuysen
20044 ( BOL).
Bryoria fuscescens (Gyeln.) Brodo & D. Hawksw.
in Opera Botanica 42: 83 (1977).
FIGURE 3. — Distribution in Africa of: Cetraria chlorophylla, ■; Pla-
tismatia glauca, *.
Alectoria fuscescens Gyeln.: 55 (1932). Type: Finland, Tavastia
austr. , Hollola, ad truncos Pini locis apricioribus in silva, J. P. Norrlin,
1882, Nyl. & Norrl., Lich. Fenn. Exs. no. 466 (BP, 33.947, lecto.).
Thallus subpendent, 30-60 mm across; main lobes
with rather abundant short lateral branches, up to 0,3
mm wide, pale brown to blackish; with abundant fissural
soralia, from rather small up to 0,5 mm wide; scattered
small fissural pseudocyphellae present; ascomata and
conidiomata not observed (Figure IE). Anatomical char-
acters similar to most other species of Bryoria, the corti-
cal layer composed of periclinal hyphae. Reactions of
medulla and particularly the soralia, K— , C— , KC— and
P+. B. fuscescens contains fumarprotocetraric acid,
clearly indicated by TLC of the examined material.
Within the genus Bryoria, B. fuscescens is one of the
most difficult species to circumscribe. It is widely dis-
tributed within the boreal zone in the northern hemis-
phere, where it also occurs in many different habitats,
frequently on trees, but also on the ground and on rocks.
The known morphological and chemical variation is
fairly wide and may be partly the result of different res-
ponses to the local diversified habitat selection pressures
(see Brodo & Hawksworth 1977; Bystrek 1963; Hawks-
worth 1972; Hawksworth 1973).
The material from southern Africa was collected at ±
1 680 m altitude on twigs at Horseshoe Peak, in the Hex
River Mountains in the western Cape (Figure 2). This is
the first known record of a member of the genus Bryoria
in southern Africa. The earlier records published by
Doidge (1950) as Alectoria chalybeiformis f. terrestris
and A. jubata have been re-examined and are apparently
filamentous Cyanobacteria.
Apart from southern Africa, B. fuscescens is also
known from several localities in the ericaceous zone and
48
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
in the alpine zone from 3 200 to 4 900 m altitude, in
Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda (Krog &
Swinscow 1975). Figure 4.
CAPE. — (3319 Worcester): Hex River Mountains, Horseshoe Peak,
on ledges on south side, on twigs, 5500 ft [1 680 m] (-DD), 1953,
Esterhuysen 22189 (BOL).
FIGURE 4. — Distribution in Africa of Bryoria fuscescens.
Bryoria motykae (D. Hawksw.) Brodo & D.
Hawksw. in Opera Botanica42: 155 (1977).
Alectoria motykae D. Hawksw. 124: 124 (1971). Type: Kenya, Mt
Kenya, Teleki Valley, alpine regions, on vertical surfaces of boulders
in the upper parts of the valley, alt. 4 200 m, 1948, Hedberg 1720b
(UPS, holo.).
Thallus prostrate, 10-30 mm long; main lobes with
arcuately curved lateral branches, dark brown or partly
blackish, up to 0,2 mm wide, with scattered fissural
pseudocyphellae, up to 0,5 mm broad; ascomata and
conidiomata not observed. Anatomical characters simi-
lar to most other species of Bryoria, the cortical layer
composed of periclinal hyphae. Reactions of medulla
and pseudocyphellae, K-, C-, KC- and P+. Bryoria
motykae contains fumarprotocetraric acid according to
Hawksworth (1971). However, TLC gave only weak
spots in the examined material, which included the type
specimen kept at UPS, and the P reaction was feint as
well.
Bryoria motykae is characterized by the dark brown or
partly blackish main lobes with arcuately curved lateral
branches, broad fissural soralia and scattered fissural
pseudocyphellae. The material from southern Africa,
however, differs slightly from the type material from
Mount Kenya ( Hedberg 1720b, UPS) in the absence of
soralia, but corresponds in the remaining characters with
the type (Figure IF). According to Hawksworth (1971)
pseudocyphellae are lacking, contrary to my observa-
tions on re-examination of the type material. Krog &
Swinscow (1975) had apparently also observed pseudo-
cyphellae, because they mention that the fissural soralia
developed from minute pseudocyphellae.
Among the possibly related species, Hawksworth
(1971) pointed out the resemblance to B.furcellata (Fr.)
Brodo & D. Hawksw. (as Alectoria nidulifera Norrl. in
Nyl.) in some characters. B.furcellata is, however, dis-
tinguished by the more spinulate lobes and the rather
abundant isidiate soredia. B. motykae is also reminiscent
of B. simplicior (Vain.) Brodo & D. Hawksw., in the
structure of the soredia (Hawksworth 1971). B. simpli-
cior is, however, a normally corticolous species, charac-
terized by a typical caespitose habit and very distinctive
soredia. In addition B. simplicior also lacks secondary
compounds.
B. bicolor (Ehrh.) Brodo & D. Hawksw. is somewhat
reminiscent of B. motykae in the similar fissural pseudo-
cyphellae, but this species is distinguished by the rather
short lateral spinules and differently coloured main
lobes. Furthermore, Krog & Swinscow (1975) included
B. ruwenzoriensis (D. Hawksw.) Brodo & D. Hawksw.,
recorded from east Africa, in B. bicolor.
In my opinion B. motykae is presumably associated
with the B. fuscescens aggregate, which also occurs in
the east African mountains. We have to await further
studies on this difficult species complex before the status
of B. motykae can be determined with certainty.
The material from southern Africa was collected at ±
1 300 m on sandy hollowed rock surfaces on the Groot
Drakenstein Mountain near Paarl in the western Cape
(Figure 2).
Apart from southern Africa, B. motykae is also known
from Mt Kenya, where it occurs at ± 3 500 m (Figure
5). The record published by Krog & Swinscow (1975)
FIGURE 5. — Distribution in Africa of Bryoria motykae.
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
49
from Mt Kilimanjaro in Tanzania, proved after re-exami-
nation to belong to the B. fuscescens group.
CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): Groot Drakenstein Peak, amongst other
lichens on sandy hollowed rock surfaces, 4500 ft [1 370m], (-CA),
1953, Esterhuysen 21356 (BOL).
REFERENCES
BRODO, I. M. & HAWKSWORTH, D. L. 1977. Alectoria and allied
genera in North America. Opera Botanica No. 42.
BYSTREK, J. 1963. De variabilitate Alectoriae fuscescentis Gyeln.
Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska C 18: 411-418.
CULBERSON, W. L. & CULBERSON, C. F. 1968. The lichen
genera Cetrelia and Platismatia (Parmeliaceae). Contributions
from the United States National Herbarium 34: 449-558.
FTLSON, R. B. 1983. Checklist of Australian lichens. National
Herbarium of Victoria, Department of Conservation, Forests &
Lands.
GALLOWAY, D. J. 1985. Flora of New Zealand. Wellington.
GYELNIK, V. 1932. A/ec/on'a-Studien. Nyt Magazin for Natur-
videnskaberne 70: 35-62.
HALE, M. E. 1979. How to know the lichens. Dubuque, Iowa.
HAWKSWORTH, D. L. 1971. Regional studies in Alectoria (Lich-
enes). I. The central and southern African species. Botaniska
Notiser 124: 122-128.
HAWKSWORTH, D. L. 1972. Regional studies in Alectoria (Lich-
enes). II. The British species. The Lichenologist 5: 181-261 .
HAWKSWORTH, D. L. 1973. Ecological factors and species delimi-
tation in the lichens. In V. H. Hey wood. Taxonomy and ecology.
31-69. London & New York.
HUMBOLDT, F. W. H. A. 1793. Florae fribergensis specimen : 20.
Berlin.
KARNEFELT, I. 1986. The genera Bryocaulon. Coelocaulon and
Cornicularia and formerly associated taxa. Opera Botanica No.
86.
KROG, H. & SWINSCOW, T. D. V. 1975. Parmeliaceae, with the
exclusion of Parmelia and Usnea, in east Africa. Norwegian
Journal of Botany 22: 115-123.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753 . Species plantarum: 1 148. Stockholm.
RASANEN, V. 1932. Zur Kenntnis der Flechtenflora Feurland’s sowie
der Prov. de Magallanes, Prov. de Chiloee und Prov. de Nuble in
Chile. Annales botanici Societatis zoologicae-botanicae Fennicae
Vanamo 2.
SATO, M. 1965. Catalogus Lichenum Japonicorum, edn. 2. Miscella-
nea Bryologica et Lichenologica .
THOMSON, J. W. 1984. American arctic lichens. I. The macroli-
chens. New York.
VAINIO, E. 1896. Lichenes in Sibiria Meridionali collecti. Acta So-
cietas Pro Fauna et Flora Fennica 13: 1-20.
WIRTH, V. 1980. Flechtenflora. Stuttgart.
Bothalia 17,1:51-65 (1987)
Species groups in the genus Ehrharta (Poaceae) in southern Africa
G. E. GIBBS RUSSELL* AND R. P. ELLIS*
Keywords: anatomy, Ehrharta, morphology, Poaceae, southern Africa, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
Ehrharta Thunb. is a genus of Gondwanaland distribution with its centre of diversity in the winter rainfall Fynbos
Biome of southern Africa. In recent subfamily treatments Ehrharta has proved difficult to place satisfactorily, and during
the past five years it has been moved between Bambusoideae and Arundinoideae. However, most previous systematic
studies using cryptic characters have covered only four taxa out of about 35. The present study includes all African taxa, and
demarcates seven species groups on the basis of both spike let morphology and leaf blade anatomy. Parallelism and/or
convergence in vegetative macromorphology within and between the species groups is widespread, and is similar, in some
cases, to adaptations found in other plant families in the Fynbos Biome. However, these macromorphological trends are not
reflected in the leaf anatomy. Leaf anatomy is generally consistent with the spike let morphology. Some anatomical
differences between the species groups in Ehrharta appear to be as great as differences between taxa of much higher ranks
elsewhere in the Poaceae. This wide range of variability may be related to an early divergence of Ehrharteae from other
grasses, as suggested by the Gondwanaland distribution, and may explain the difficulty of placing this fascinating yet
baffling genus in a subfamily.
UITTREKSEL
Ehrharta is ’n genus van Gondwanaland-verspreiding met sy middelpunt van verskeidenheid in die winterreenval-Fyn-
bosbioom van suidelike Afrika. In onlangse subfamilie-behandelings is dit moeilik gevind om Ehrharta bevredigend te
plaas, en gedurende die afgelope vyf jaar is dit oor en weer in Bambusoideae en Arundinoideae geplaas. Die meeste vorige
sistematiese ondersoeke waarin verskuilde kenmerke gebruik is, het slegs vier taksons uit ongeveer 35 gedek. Die onderha-
wige ondersoek sluit al die Afrika-taksons in, en baken sewe spesiegroepe af op grond van die morfologie van die
blompakkie en die anatomie van die blaarskyf. Parallelisme en/of konvergensie in vegetatiewe makromorfologie binne en
tussen spesiegroepe is wydverspreid en is in sommige gevalle soortgelyk aan aanpassings wat by ander plantfamilies in die
Fynbosbioom aangetref word. Hierdie makromorfologie se neigings word nie in die blaaranatomie weerspieel nie. Blaarana-
tomie is oor die algemeen in ooreenstemming met die morfologie van die blompakkie. Sommige anatomiese verskille tussen
die spesiegroepe in Ehrharta blyk net so groot te wees soos verskille tussen taksons van 'n veel hoer rang elders in die
Poaceae. Hierdie wye verskeidenheid mag verband hou met ’n vroee divergensie van Ehrharteae vanaf ander grasse, soos
aangedui deur die Gondwanaland-verspreiding, en mag ’n verklaring bied waarom hierdie bekorende maar raaiselagtige
genus moeilik in 'n subfamilie geplaas kan word.
CONTENTS
Introduction 51
Materials and methods 52
Historical background 53
The classification of Ehrharta within the
Poaceae 53
The southern African species of Ehrharta 53
Taxonomic characters 54
Morphological characters 54
Anatomical characters 58
Outline of the species groups in Ehrharta 59
Setacea group 59
Capensis group 59
Longifolia subgroup 60
Capensis subgroup 61
Erecta group 61
Calycina group 62
Villosa group 62
Ramosa group 63
Dura group 63
* Botanical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and Water
Supply, Private Bag X 101 , Pretoria 0001 .
Conclusions 64
Acknowledgements 64
References 64
INTRODUCTION
In the most recent treatment (Willemse 1982), the
tribe Ehrharteae Nevski (1937) consists of only a single
genus, Ehrharta Thunb. (1779) which includes the gen-
era Microlaena R. Br., Petriella Zotov and Tetrarhena
R. Br. Its distribution area in southern Africa, south-
western, southern and eastern Australia, Tasmania, New
Zealand and Malesia falls within the cool-temperate
Gondwanaland region (Figure 1). The centre of diversity
for the genus is the winter rainfall Cape Floristic Region
(Goldblatt 1978) or Fynbos Biome (Rutherford & West-
fall 1986) of southern Africa, with about 35 taxa, the
other 10 taxa being distributed unevenly elsewhere in the
range of the genus. In southern Africa, Ehrharta can be
divided into seven species groups demarcated on the
basis of both spikelet morphology and leaf blade anat-
omy.
An understanding of the variation within Ehrharta in
southern Africa is necessary, not only to improve the
classification of the local taxa, but also to show the
relationships between the bulk of the genus in southern
Africa and its representatives in other Gondwanaland
52
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
FIGURE 1. — Worldwide distribution of Ehrharta, showing the number of species and infraspecific taxa reported for various areas. The
number of southern African species naturalized in India and Australia are indicated with an asterisk.
regions. Ehrharta may therefore serve as an additional
plant group to indicate the floristic history of the Gond-
wanaland continents, and is the first representative of the
Poaceae with this potential to be studied with this aim.
Additional information on Ehrharta is required
because its position within the Poaceae is not yet settled.
Since the time of Bentham & Hooker (1883), the group
has been shuffled between the Phalarideae and the Ory-
zeae of the Pooideae (Festucoideae), the Ehrharteae and
Arundineae of the Arundinoideae, the Ehrharteae of the
Oryzoideae, and the Ehrharteae and the Oryzanae of the
Bambusoideae. Modem studies based on cryptic charac-
ters such as leaf anatomy, chromosomes and embryo
types have enabled most grass tribes to be clearly placed
in one of about five subfamilies, but there is still no
general agreement regarding the affinities of the Ehrhar-
teae. Prat (1960) and Clifford & Watson (1977) place the
tribe in an unclassified residue that does not fit neatly
into any of the modem subfamilial concepts of the Poa-
ceae. Most recently, Ehrharteae has been removed from
the Arundinoideae (Renvoize 1981) to the Bambusoi-
deae (Renvoize 1985; Watson etal. 1985).
The instability of the higher classification of the
Ehrharteae may be partly a result of the high degree of
variation in its anatomical characters. Differences
between species and species groups in the southern Afri-
can species appear to be as great as differences between
taxa of much higher rank elsewhere in the Poaceae.
Overseas workers who have examined only a few taxa
may have erroneously concluded that they are represen-
tative of the entire genus or tribe. This wide range of
variability may be a result of the early divergence of the
Ehrharteae from other grasses, as suggested by the
ancient Gondwanaland distribution pattern.
The representatives of Ehrharta in southern Africa
may help to provide a better understanding both of the
history of the flowering plants and of the early evolution
of the Poaceae. They will therefore be treated in some
detail. We propose to set out the species groups infor-
mally in this introductory paper, and thereafter to publish
a parallel series of papers covering the taxonomy and
anatomy of each species group. A concluding paper will
present a formal generic and infrageneric classification
and will develop hypotheses about the phylogeny of the
species groups, and their phytogeographical signifi-
cance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
For the morphological investigations, herbarium
specimens were examined from BOL, JF, K, NBG,
PRE, SAM and STE. The PRE material includes the
anatomical voucher specimens of Ellis, described below.
Field observations were made for about 30 of the taxa.
Spikelets were dissected without special preparation, and
were observed with a dissecting microscope.
For the anatomical investigations, specimens of
Ehrharta plants were collected in the field throughout
South Africa during the period 1974 to 1984. A total of
160 specimens were collected representing most of the
taxa recognized in this genus. This sample was designed
to incorporate considerable morphological and geo-
graphical variation in many taxa. Herbarium voucher
specimens were prepared for identification by the Natio-
nal Herbarium (PRE) after segments of leaf blade mate-
rial had been removed and fixed in FAA (Johansen
1940).
Transverse sections, 10 /zm thick, were prepared after
desilicification in 30% hydrofluoric acid (Breakwell
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
53
1914), dehydration using the method of Feder & O’Brien
(1968) and infiltration and embedding in Tissue Prep
(Fisher Scientific). The sections were stained in safranin
and fast green (Johansen 1940). The manual scraping
method of Metcalfe (1960) was used to prepare scrapes
of the abaxial epidermis. These were either double-
stained in methylene blue and ruthenium red or only in
safranin. The anatomical detail was recorded photo-
graphically using a Reicherdt Univar microscope and
Ilford Pan F film (ASA 50).
The material fixed in FAA was also used for ultra-
structural studies with a scanning electron microscope.
The leaf blade segments were dehydrated in 2,2-
dimethoxypropane (Merck) for 2 hours and then placed
in 100% acetone for 5 minutes following the method
described by Neumann, Rushing & Mueller (1982). The
material was critical point dried with liquid C02 at 85
atmospheres at 40° C after which it was mounted on
aluminium stubs with double sided tape. It was then
glow discharge coated with a thin (± 400 A°) layer of
metallic gold in a sputter coater. Preparations were either
stored in a dessicator with silica gel or observed directly
with an ISI SX-25 scanning electron microscope ope-
rated at 25 Kv accelerating voltage. Cuticular structure
was photographed with a 6 x 7 cm camera on Ilford
FP4 120 film at varying magnification.
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
The classification o/Ehrharta within the Poaceae
The placement of Ehrharta in the grass family has
varied at both the tribal and subfamilial level (Table 1).
Most older systems, based only on spike let morphology,
place Ehrharta in Phalarideae because of the two sterile
florets below the single fertile floret. Modem treatments
based on a number of cryptic characters place the genus
in a tribe of its own, Ehrharteae. Although first distin-
guished as an entity by Link (1827), his authorship of the
name cannot be accepted for nomenclatural reasons
(Willemse 1982). Thus, Nevski (1937) is the recognized
author for Ehrharteae, which was also described in error
as new by Tateoka (1957). Nees (1841), in the earliest
treatment of southern African grasses that adopted a
suprageneric classification, placed Ehrharta in the
Oryzeae, although Trinius (1839), working in co-opera-
tion with Nees, had earlier placed it in the Phalarideae,
where it remained until the modem system of Stebbins &
Crampton (1961), who placed the tribe back into the
Oryzoideae.
Although there is now agreement on tribal composi-
tion, the question of subfamily classification is not yet
settled. The most recent treatments include Ehrharteae in
Bambusoideae (Renvoize 1985; Watson etal. 1985), but
both discuss the difficulty of including Ehrharteae in the
subfamily as they constitute it. Renvoize (1985) states
that there is no clear correlation between anatomical and
other characters, such as embryo type and lodicules, and
Watson et al. (1985) indicate that, although they decided
to treat the group as bambusoid, other numerical
analyses either place it as arundinoid or lose it alto-
gether. Soderstrom & Ellis (in prep.), who classify bam-
busoid genera and allies, place the Ehrharteae outside the
Bambusoideae, closer to Arundinoideae.
This confused situation may be explained partly
because, as Table 1 indicates, the modem subfamily
classifications are based on a very small set of data
derived from only a few species. In this century, only
Tateoka (1963) has examined more than three taxa, and
only four taxa in all have been examined either for chro-
mosomes, embryos or leaf blade anatomy. The detailed
study of the southern African taxa of Ehrharta presented
in this and following papers should provide the breadth
of information needed to indicate the natural affinities of
this fascinating but baffling genus.
The southern African species o/ Ehrharta
The study of African Ehrharta falls into three phases,
which correspond roughly to the 18th, 19th and 20th
centuries. The earliest phase was characterized by the
description of species in four different genera. L. C. M.
Richard (1779) described Trochera striata, and a few
months later Thunberg (1779) described Ehrharta
capensis. These names were based on different types but
represent the same taxon. Soon after, Linnaeus (1791)
described two more species, but placed them in the
genus Aira. Lamarck (1786), J. E. Smith (1789, 1790)
and J. F. Gmelin (1791) each described species in Thun-
berg’s genus Ehrharta. However, Thunberg himself
(1794) accounted for his specimens collected from the
Cape in Melica, so that his Prodromus plantarum capen-
sium treatment comprised two genuine Melica species
and four species of Ehrharta.
The second phase, one of consolidation, began in the
next century with Swartz’s (1802) thorough and beauti-
fully illustrated study of the genus, in which he recog-
nized nine species, each with synonyms. He described
no new taxa, but moved Thunberg ’s ‘Melicas’ to
Ehrharta. He was aware of, but did not take up, Tro-
chera as the name for the genus. He also did not always
follow priority of publication in applying the specific
epithets, although his synonymy within each species is
otherwise sound. Palisot de Beauvois (1812) alone took
up the name Trochera, to which he attributed two
species.
Schrader (1821) covered 17 species, including all
those in Swartz’s (1802) treatment as well as eight new
species that were based on the specimens of Hesse. He
was the first to divide the genus into sections, distin-
guishing two entities on the character of bulbous versus
fibrous ‘roots’. Although published two years later,
Thunberg’s (1823) Flora capensis treatment was merely
a summary of Swartz (1802), and did not include
Schrader’s species. During this period of consolidation,
a few new species were described by Kunth (1829), by
Schultes (1830) and by Steudel (1853).
Most ambitious of the nineteenth-century studies of
Ehrharta were those of Nees ab Esenbeck (1832, 1839,
1841). His Florae Africae Australioris (1841) recog-
nized 25 species, of which nine were described by him,
using collections of Drege and Ecklon. Nees also put
forward a multitude of varieties (nine in E. calycina
alone), which, however were not validly published be-
cause he did not consistently apply Articles 24-27 of the
ICBN (Linder 1985). He adopted Schrader’s basic divi-
sion of the genus by ‘root’ type, and in addition sub-
divided the fibrous-rooted species according to size and
hairiness of the sterile lemmas. These subdivisions are
54
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
TABLE 1. — Subfamily and tribal classifications of Ehrharta by various authors
still recognized, although a number of the species have
been re-aligned.
The last of the comprehensive nineteenth-century
accounts of Ehrharta was that of Steudel (1853). He
compiled the species known at that time, 32 in all for
southern Africa. Of greatest significance is his basic
division of these species into two groups, not by the
possession of a bulbous base, as previously, but by the
separation of E. setacea and E. rupestris into a group
(‘Racemosae’) distinct from the rest of the species (‘Pan-
iculatae’). It is unfortunate that he did not elaborate on
the characters on which he based his decision, because
this fundamental division in Ehrharta is supported by the
present study. After 1855, no further work was done in
the genus except that Kuntze (1891), rediscovering the
priority of the genus name Trochera, transferred all the
then-accepted taxa to Trochera.
The third phase in the taxonomic study of Ehrharta
has been dominated by Stapfs (1900) Flora capensis
treatment, which is the most recent critical study of the
southern African taxa. He also recognized 25 species, of
which six were newly described by him, and he placed a
number of previously recognized species into synonymy.
Chippindall (1955) adopted Stapfs concepts, only mak-
ing changes in the keys and stressing close relationships
between some of Stapfs taxa. She included a new
species of C. E. Hubbard (1933), but omitted that of
Mez (1921). Since 1955, new taxa have been described
by Launert (1961) and Gibbs Russell (1984a, 1984b).
Stapf did not follow Kuntze (1891) in taking up the
name Trochera, and soon after the conservation of
generic names was permitted, Ehrharta of Thunberg was
conserved over Trochera of L. C. M. Richard, which
was rejected in ICBN (Voss etal. 1983).
TAXONOMIC CHARACTERS
The taxa described by previous workers can be
grouped into seven easily recognizable groups on the
basis of morphological and anatomical characters as
shown in Table 2. A brief discussion of those characters
found to be useful in this regard follows.
Morphological characters
1 . Macromorphological characters
For a genus of moderate size, Ehrharta has a wide
range of macromorphological characters, a selection of
which are shown in Table 2. They are reasonably well
known, from the detailed descriptions of Stapf (1900)
and the briefer but more image-creating descriptions of
Chippindall (1955). However, unless the species are
placed in groups based on spikelet morphology and leaf
blade anatomy, the diversity of vegetative characters is
confusing. With these groupings, it can be seen that
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
55-56
TABLE 2. — Morphological and anatomical characters used to differentiate species groups in Ehrharta. Each group is referred to by the name of a widespread species that exhibits the characters of the group
3. MESOPHYLL:
Arm cells (A)
Compact isodiametric (B)
Compact angular (C)
Diffuse irregular (I)
4. EPIDERMAL ZONATION:
Differentiated (D)
Undifferentiated (U)
5. INTERCOSTAL LONG CELLS:
Hexagonal length (JU)
Rectangular (R)
Sinuous walls (S)
Straight walls (W)
6. STOMATA:
Absent (A)
Wax bodies present (P), absent (X)
Epidermal flanges (E)
7. SILICA BODIES:
Paired (P), Short rows (S)
Rounded (R) Dumbell (D)
8. PRICKLES:
Hook-like (H), Macrohair-like (M)
9. MICROHAIRS:
Distal cell truncated (X), not taper-
ing (Y), tapering (Z)
10. EPICUTICULAR WAX:
Present (P), Absent (A)
(D)
U
(D)
U
u u u u u u
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
s s s s s s s
H H H H H H H
X
p
X
p
X
A
u
<10
s
D
D
10-20 10-20
S S
* 10-20 10-20
* c c
(W) (W)
H H
M M
* Z
* p
>20 >20 >20
WWW
M M
S
D
M
W
S
D
H,M
D D
>20 10-20 >20 >20 >20 >20 >20 >20
W W W W
(S)
w
w w
h,m H.M H.M H,M h m
(B)
c
10-20
R
S
(B) B
C
D D
H H
~~U ” ~ 3 h r. trimvtata 4 E setacea subsp. setacea; 5, E. setacea subsp. uniflora ; 6, E. setacea
_ , „ oro ioHiratpd hv number as follows: 1, E. rupestris subsp. rupestris; 2, E. rupestris subsp. dodii; 3, E. rupestris suosp. in h/irhinndis' 15 £ loneiflora; 16, E. erecta Var. erecta; 17, E. erecta var.
The species and infraspecific ta^a m each group y £ ottonis- 10, E. capensis var. capensis; 11, E. capensis var. intermedia', 12, E. bulbosa; 13, E_eb“me?'. j5 £ pus ilia' 26, E. melicoides; 27, E. gigantea; 28, E. villosa var. villosa;
subsp .xabnr, 7 , E. setacea subsp. dtshcha, 8 \ E lonetfolm. . £ 22, E. brevifolia vai. cuspidata; 23. B. brevifdu, var brevi folia, 24, E catycma, IS.h.pusMc.
“ J nE — “af rSU 32, E vbspica.a; 33, * var. flUfomus; 34, * — 35, £ ^
* anatomical preparations not available.
1
E
E
A
P
R
T
Pi
M
Si
(
Ja
Cl
Cl
(
Re
Re
Wa
stil
bet
act
co
SOI
di\
po:
sep
(‘F
icu
the
thi:
pre
the
prit
the
1
has
trea
sou
whi
nun
Chi
ing
bet\
spet
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
57
there are a few parallel trends that occur in several
species groups, and that a number of differences in struc-
ture are associated with each trend. For example,
suffrutescence occurs in four of the species groups (Seta-
cea, Capensis, Gigantea and Ramosa), and involves, in
each group, long branched rhizomes, much branched
culms that serve as the main photosynthetic organ, and
reduction of leaf blades.
a. Habit in the majority of Ehrharta species is peren-
nial, but several are annual. The annual habit seems
related to unpredictable moisture availability. All the
annual species, except one, occur in the drier north-
western part of the range of the genus, centred on the
Succulent Karoo, from about Clanwilliam north to
southern SWA/Namibia. These species fall only in the
Erecta and Calycina groups, and each has closely related
perennial species in the more mesic central part of the
distribution of the genus. The other annual species, E.
longiflora, grows in seasonally wet places, and it has,
for an Ehrharta, a wide distribution, occurring not only
in arid areas to the northwest, but as far east as Port
Alfred. It is the only species in which the spikelet
morphology is not consistent with the leaf blade
anatomy.
b. Rhizomes occur in all perennial species, but the
form of the rhizome varies widely, and is correlated with
the substrate. Species that grow between rocks have
tough, branched, naked rhizomes that are hardly diffe-
rent from the lower part of the culm. These rhizomes can
creep for several meters in deep cracks, so that the plant
forms a dense linear cushion. Species that occur in sand
have long branching rhizomes that run 0,3 m or more
below the soil surface and send up culms at the tips, so
that a single plant can appear to be a loose colony several
meters across. These rhizomes may be naked or densely
clothed by hairy cataphylls. Species that grow in clay or
loam soils usually have short knotted rhizomes that do
not spread far away from the base of the individual plant,
although in a few species unbranched rhizomes a few
centimeters long and with papery cataphylls may occur.
c. Culm characteristics are the most important in
determining the overall appearance of a grass plant, and
in Ehrharta the culms are very diverse. In different taxa
the culms vary from solitary to numerous, from herba-
ceous to wiry or woody, from erect to procumbent, from
unbranched to simply or verticillately branched. Length
varies between taxa from less than 100 mm to over 1 ,5 m
in flowering individuals.
Taxa in the Capensis groups have the lowest (some-
times the two lowest) intemodes modified into an
extremely hard cylindrical or globose bulb-like structure.
The occurrence of this ‘bulb’ may be associated with the
periodic fires in the fynbos. ‘Bulbous’ species are much
in evidence for a year or two after a fire, but apparently
do not occur in long-unbumed situations. However,
immediately following the next bum, flowering plants
may be found with many old dead ‘bulbs’ hidden under-
ground, indicating that the plant is several years old,
having survived the fireless period in this form.
Stolons are known only in a local limestone variant of
the widespread species E. calycina.
d. Leaves, as in other grasses, are composed of
sheath, ligule and blade. The sheaths are split to the base
and usually cylindrical, or rarely keeled. In some species
the upper sheaths may be longer than the intemodes, so
the leaves are closely imbricate. In suffrutescent species
with reduced leaf blades the sheaths may be persistent
around the culm, or be held outward at an angle, or they
may be lost. The basal sheaths may be persistent,
densely clothing the base of the culm, or they may slip
away from the culm with age, leaving it exposed. A few
taxa may be distinguished by a characteristic colour of
the basal sheaths.
The ligules are short, usually less than 3 mm long, and
take the form of a ciliate rim in all species groups except
the Erecta and Calycina groups, in which most taxa have
glabrous ligules.
The leaf blades vary from broad and flat, often with
one or both margins with a heavy undulate marginal
vein, to folded, rolled, setaceous or absent. Length
varies between taxa, from less than 100 mm to over 1 m.
Loss or reduction of leaf blades is correlated with suffru-
tescence. In these taxa, the phenology of leaf blade
development should be studied in the field, because it is
possible that striking differences in appearance may be
due to the age of a plant rather than to genetic dif-
ferences.
e. Inflorescences are most commonly paniculate, but
in some taxa may be reduced to a raceme with few spike-
lets, and there is often a tendency for the narrower inflo-
rescences to be secund. Generally the inflorescence is
exserted far above the highest leaf sheath, but in a few
taxa (especially annuals) it is closely subtended or even
enveloped below by an inflated leaf sheath. In some taxa
with racemose inflorescences the main axis curves sinu-
ously around the appressed spikelets.
2. Spikelet morphology
The spikelets are usually laterally compressed,
although in some taxa the sides are rounded. At matu-
rity, the spikelet is shed as a unit above the glumes,
which are persistent on the pedicel. A spikelet consists of
a pair of glumes, two empty sterile lemmas, and, at the
tip of the rachis, a fertile floret composed of lemma,
palea and bisexual flower. Each species group has a
characteristic range of spikelet sizes.
a. Glumes are subequal, and may be shorter than,
equal to or longer than the whole spikelet, and relative
glume length is a useful character for distinguishing
between species in a group. The glumes are more papery
in texture than the lemmas, and are unomamented.
b. Sterile lemmas are the single most striking spikelet
feature of Ehrharta. Their curious sculpturing in some
species is unknown elsewhere in the grass family, and
renders a detached spikelet immediately recognizable.
Shape, relative size and. ornamentation of the sterile lem-
mas are the most useful characters in separating the
species groups. In three of the species groups, Erecta,
Calycina and Dura, the tips of the sterile lemmas can
have long awns, and in the Capensis and Villosa groups
the bases are shortly stipitate. In most Ehrhartas the ster-
ile lemmas are of similar size and the smaller fertile
lemma differs from them, but in the Setacea group the
first sterile lemma is short and glume-like and the fertile
lemma is similar to the second sterile lemma.
58
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
The lemma surfaces may be dull or shining, scaberu-
lous or smooth. The sides and margins may be glabrous
or have hairs of various lengths, and the bases may be
glabrous or bearded. The bases of the second sterile
lemma and the fertile lemma come together in a hinge-
like joint that resembles an earlobe, and which may have
a membranous appendage. All these characteristics are
used in separating the species groups. Differences in
transverse and longitudinal ribs and veins distinguish
species within the groups.
c. Fertile florets have a lemma that is smaller and
more laterally compressed than the sterile lemmas, and is
unomamented. The palea is sickle-shaped or straight, is
much smaller then the lemma and is usually hidden
within it. The fertile florets of most species are similar,
and are not useful for distinguishing species or groups.
d. Flower structure is remarkable in Ehrharta because
of the presence of six stamens in most species, although
some of the taxa with small spikelets may have five,
four, three or one stamens. The two lodicules are relati-
vely large and flat, and are usually ovate or 2-lobed.
e. Cary op sis information for comparison is lacking
because of the small number of spikelets that are found
to have mature fruits. It appears that the spikelet is shed
as soon as the fruit is mature. The lack of this informa-
tion, as well as data about embryos, is a serious defect in
our knowledge of the genus.
Anatomical characters
A suite of leaf blade anatomical characters separate
and define the various species groups in Ehrharta. These
cryptic features are manifested in the leaf blade as seen
in transverse section, in the abaxial epidermis in surface
view and ultrastructurally (Table 2). Some of these
characters distinguishing the species groups recognized
in Ehrharta are generally considered to be features of
high taxonomic value, important at the subfamily level
in the Poaceae. In Ehrharta, however, they separate taxa
below the generic level. Examples are differences in
mesophyll structure and microhair shape.
The 10 characters which were scored for all the
southern African Ehrharta taxa are diagramatically
represented in Table 4. This suite of anatomical charac-
ters in combination serves to define and diagnose each of
the seven species groups as well as two subgroups within
one of the groups. The variation encountered in most of
the characters in most of the groups will be fully
described and discussed in subsequent papers. The
character states used to define each of the groups here
are, therefore, somewhat generalized and may vary wi-
thin certain limits and intergrade between certain groups.
In the cases where variation was observed, definite lines
of development could be traced and the variation could
usually be interpreted on this basis.
1 . Midrib or keel
The vascular structure of the keel or midrib is an
important character in grass taxonomy at the subfamily
level. Complex vasculature of the keel would definitely
support bambusoid affinities as suggested by many
authors. This type of keel does not occur in any of the
species groups from South Africa but the presence of
only a median vascular bundle or the presence of a defi-
nite keel with additional parenchyma tissue differs
between the species groups recognized, and only varies
within the Calycina group.
2. Ribs and furrows
Adaxial ribs and furrows, particularly the massive ribs
of the Longifolia group, distinguish certain groups. The
raised, inflated abaxial epidermal cells in the mid-inter-
costal zones of the Calycina group are diagnostic and of
considerable phylogenetic interest because this charac-
teristic is shared with the Phalarideae with which the
Ehrharteae has been linked by earlier authors. These
epidermal cells are also evident in the epidermis as seen
in surface view.
3. Mesophyll
The chlorenchyma cells of Ehrharta are surprisingly
variable in structure and arrangement. In the Setacea
group arm cells definitely are present in some taxa. This
is a bambusoid characteristic but is also known in some
taxa without bambusoid or oryzoid affinities (Watson et
al. 1985). In some groups the chlorenchyma cells are
compact and angular with minute air spaces but, in other
groups this tissue is very diffuse, of irregular, rounded
cells with air spaces clearly visible. In the Villosa group
the abaxial layer of chlorenchyma is very regular and
almost palisade-like.
4. Epidermal zonation
Some groups are distinguished by costal and intercos-
tal zones on the abaxial surface. Zonation is not evident
in the Setacea and Longifolia groups and this is asso-
ciated with an absence of abaxial stomata as observed in
these two groups. This lack of zonation appears to be
associated with the ecological conditions of the Moun-
tain Fynbos with very low soil nutrition and also occurs
in many of the danthonoid grasses from the same habi-
tats. Species from the Lowland Fynbos, on the other
hand, have clear epidermal zonation and abaxial sto-
mata. These characters tend to vary in groups which
have a wide ecological tolerance and occur in both these
two major habitat types.
5. Intercostal long cells
Hexagonal or inflated but rather short long cells with
sinuous walls distinguish some groups, whereas others
have elongate, fusiform, hexagonal intercostal long cells
with straight walls. In the Calycina group with this latter
type of long cell, the mid-intercostal cells are much
longer than the lateral ones and these cells are also the
raised, inflated cells as seen in transverse section. In
other groups the intercostal long cells are rectangular
with sinuous walls.
6. Abaxial stomata
The stomata of the various species groups of Ehrharta
are also of taxonomic interest. They may be absent on
the abaxial surface, as in the Longifolia group and in
many taxa of the Setacea group. In the Capensis group
the guard cells are clearly visible but the subsidiary cells
are covered with wax platelets, as seen with the scanning
electron microscope. In the Erecta group the stomata are
often obscured by large, solid wax plugs, whereas, in the
Calycina group cubical wax granules often overlie the
stomata. In the Villosa group the stomata are sunken and
overarched by four characteristic papilla-like flanges
from the adjoining long cells. In the Ramosa group the
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
59
stomata have no associated wax deposits whereas in the
Dura group the pores are obscured by dense accumula-
tions of wax platelets. Stomatal structure, and associated
epicuticular wax, therefore, serves to distinguish all but
two of the species groups in Ehrharta and provides use-
ful characters at the species level. The low dome-shaped
subsidiary cells, which are present throughout Ehrharta,
are typical of, but not exclusive to, the Arundinoideae
(Renvoize 1981).
7. Costal silica bodies
The silica bodies of Ehrharta are somewhat variable
and rather difficult to use as diagnostic characters.
Single, rounded, or paired bodies characterize some
groups whereas in others this type of body is more dumb-
bell-shaped. In the Erecta and Calycina groups the costal
silica bodies are in short chains and of the dumbbell type
but this shape can only be determined by varying the
focus. Silica body shape and arrangement is often a
character differentiating taxa at higher taxonomic levels
than that of genus.
8. Prickles
The costal macrohair-like type of prickle hair is only
found in the Erecta and Calycina groups. This type ol
hair is common in the pooid and bambusoid grasses but
is much rarer in the arundinoids. In the other species
groups of Ehrharta, only shortly barbed prickles occur,
except in the Longifolia subgroup of the Capensis group
where prickle hairs are absent.
9. Microhairs
Microhairs in Ehrharta are very small and difficult to
observe with the light microscope. However, they are
clearly visible with the SEM and clear differences
between the species groups are visible. The hairs may
have short, truncated distal cells or this cell may taper to
an acute apex. The length of the hairs also differs
between the species groups. The Longifolia subgroup is
the only grouping that does not possess abaxial micro-
hairs. Microhair shape is a very important character
separating the subfamilies of the Poaceae and the degree
of variation observed in Ehrharta is most unusual.
10. Epicuticular wax
The occurrence and nature of the epicuticular wax
deposits also appears to be a useful taxonomic character
in Ehrharta, serving to distinguish between the species
groups. The wax may be absent or present either as fine
rods or as heavier platelets. The significance of this wax
as a feature of higher taxonomic application is unknown.
The suite of leaf anatomical characters used to
distinguish the species groups in Ehrharta, therefore,
includes a wide spectrum of attributes and, in combina-
tion, these features serve to assign any given specimen to
a particular group. However, it is not easy to identify to
the species level using leaf anatomical criteria because
the species are not so distinct anatomically. Neverthe-
less, the recognition and definition of the seven groups
of species in this very difficult genus will definitely help
in providing new insights into the phylogenetic relation-
ships of the genus, until such time as sufficient embryo
and chromosome data are available.
OUTLINE OF SPECIES GROUPS
Each of the species groups in Ehrharta can be
described on the basis of a set of morphological and
anatomical characters as summarized in Tables 3 & 4
respectively. A brief synopsis of characters and diagno-
sis is then given for the constituent taxa of each group.
SETACEA GROUP
Included taxa (Gibbs Russell 1984)
E. rupestris Nees ex Trin.
subsp. rupestris
subsp. tricostata (Stapf) Gibbs Russell
subsp. dodii (Stapf) Gibbs Russell
E. setacea Nees
subsp. setacea
subsp. scabra (Stapf) Gibbs Russell
subsp. uniflora (Burch, ex Stapf) Gibbs Russell
subsp. disticha Gibbs Russell
Morphological description
1. Perennial.
2. Culms herbaceous or suffrutescent.
3. No parts bulbous.
4. Leaf ligules ciliate.
5. Leaf blades expanded in herbaceous taxa, either setaceous or
folded in suffrutescent taxa.
6. Spikelets fewer than 20.
7. Spikelets 4—8 mm long.
8. Glumes one third to almost equalling lemma length.
9. First sterile lemma reduced and glume-like, with veins.
10. Second sterile lemma base not stipitate, lacking appendages.
11. Sterile lemma surface rough.
12. Sterile lemma sides glabrous.
13. Sterile lemma bases not bearded.
14. Sterile lemma tips awnless, not mucronate.
Anatomical description
1 . No keel developed; only median vascular bundle present.
2. Adaxial ribs and furrows present; ribs rounded and well developed
(except in E. setacea subsp. disticha and subsp. uniflora).
3. Mesophyll compact, of small rounded or isodiametric cells;
tendency for arm cell-like invaginations in all taxa; E. setacea
subsp. scabra with typical bambusoid-like arm cells.
4. Costal and intercostal zones not differentiated (except in those
species with abaxial stomata — E. setacea subsp. disticha and
subsp. uniflora ).
5. Intercostal long cells inflated to hexagonal; short, less than 20 pm
long (usually less than 10 /am long); with sinuous walls.
6. Abaxial stomata absent (except in E. setacea subsp. disticha and
subsp. uniflora and then without wax platelets).
7. Costal silica bodies single or paired or absent; rounded.
8. Costal and intercostal prickles present; either hooks or asperites
with very short barbs; absent in E. setacea subsp. disticha and
subsp. uniflora.
9. Microhairs with short, truncated distal cell; longer in E. setacea
subsp. disticha and subsp. uniflora.
10. Epicuticular wax either absent or as fine rods.
Distinguished by:
First sterile lemma reduced, glume-like. Spikelets fewer than 20.
Arm cells present.
CAPENSIS GROUP
Included taxa (Gibbs Russell 1984a; Smook & Gibbs Russell 1985)
E. longifolia Schrad.
E. oltonis Kunth ex Nees
60
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
TABLE 3. — Morphological characters diagnostic for the species groups in Ehrharta
E. barbinodis Nees ex Trin.
E. capertsw Thu nb.
E. bulbosa J. E. Sm.
E. eburnea Gibbs Russell
Morphological description
1. Perennial.
2. Culms herbaceous (except E. barbinodis where they are suffru-
tescent).
3. Culm base bulbous at lowest intemode (except E. barbinodis ) .
4. Leaf ligulesciliate.
5. Leaf blades expanded or rolled (but very short in E. barbinodis).
6. Spikelets many (but less than 35 in E. eburnea).
7. Spikelets 7-13 mm long.
8. Glumes 1 4-/4 lemma length.
9. First sterile lemma not reduced, lacking veins.
10. Second sterile lemma base stipitate, lacking appendages.
11. Sterile lemma surface rough.
12. Sterile lemma sides glabrous.
13. Sterile lemma bases bearded.
14. Sterile lemma tips awnless, mucronate.
Distinguished by:
Lowest culm node bulbous (except E. barbinodis). Second sterile
lemma stipitate. Spikelets large, 7-13 mm long, hairy at margins.
Anatomical description
Anatomically this group cannot be defined satisfactorily as the taxa
included vary greatly in anatomy. Nevertheless, two distinct and ana-
tomically homogeneous subgroups can be distingushed and these will
be dealt with separately.
LONGIFOLIA SUBGROUP
Included taxa (Smook & Gibbs Russell 1985)
E. longifolia Schrad.
E. ottonis Kunth. ex Nees
Anatomical description
1 Keels absent; median vascular bundle undifferentiated from lateral
first order vascular bundles.
2. Massive adaxial ribs and deep, cleft-like furrows with interlocking
prickles.
3. Mesophyll compact, of large angular cells; in U-shaped groups
occupying the sides and bases of the furrows.
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
61
TABLE 4. — Anatomical characters diagnostic for the species groups in Ehrharta
4. Costal and intercostal zones only slightly differentiated.
5. Intercostal long cells inflated and short; less than 10 gm long; with
sinuous walls.
6. Abaxial stomata absent.
7. Costal silica bodies paired or single; rounded.
8. Costal prickles absent.
9. Abaxial microhairs absent.
10. Epicuticular wax absent.
Distinguished by:
Setaceous leaves without arm cells.
CAPENSIS SUBGROUP
Included taxa (Gibbs Russell 1984a; Smook & Gibbs Russell 1985)
E. barbinodis Nees ex Trin.
E. capensis Thunb.
E. bulbosa J. E. Sm.
£. eburnea Gibbs Russell
Anatomical description
1. Keel present comprising 1 or 3 vascular bundles (E. capensis) or
absent (E. barbinodis)-, margin with conspicuous sclerenchyma
cap.
2. Adaxial ribs and furrows absent.
3. Mesophyll semi-radiate; of compact but large, angular cells.
4. Costal and intercostal zones well differentiated.
5. Intercostal long cells elongate hexagonal, fusiform; between
10-20 gm long; with slightly sinuous walls.
6. Abaxial stomata present; subsidiary cells covered with wax plate-
lets but pore visible.
7. Costal silica bodies single or paired; irregularly dumbbell-shaped.
8. Costal prickles with short barbs and intercostal prickles elongated,
macrohair-like with bulbous bases.
9. Microhairs elongate, with tapering distal cell.
10. Epicuticular wax deposits as fine rods.
Distinguished by:
Presence of midrib and hexagonal long cells less than 20 gm long;
stomata with wax platelets.
ERECTA GROUP
Included taxa (Smook & Gibbs Russell 1985)
E. e recta Lam.
var. erecta
var. natalensis Stapf
var. abyssinica (Hochst. ) Pilg.
£. triandra Nees ex Trin.
£. longiflora J. E. Sm. (but spikelets similar to Capensis group)
Morphological description
1. Perennial or annual.
2. Culms herbaceous.
3. No parts bulbous.
4. Leaf ligules glabrous.
5. Leaf blades expanded.
6. Spikelets many.
62
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
7. Spikelets 3, 0-7, 5 mm long.
8. Glumes lA-2A lemma length.
9. First sterile lemma not reduced, veined.
10. Second sterile lemma base not stipitate, lacking appendages.
11. Sterile lemma surface rough (but smooth in some specimens of
E. erecta subsp. erecta).
12. Sterile lemma sides glabrous.
13. Sterile lemma bases bearded (except in E. erecta subsp. erecta and
E. triandra).
14. Sterile lemma tips not mucronate.
Anatomical description
1. Keel present; comprises one vascular bundle with ground
parenchyma.
2. Very slight adaxial ribs and wide, shallow furrows present; may be
absent.
3. Mesophyll rather diffuse of somewhat irregular, rounded cells; air
spaces clearly visible.
4. Costal and intercostal zones clearly differentiated.
5. Mid-intercostal long cells hexagonal, fusiform in shape; elongate,
more than 30 gm long; straight- walled.
6. Abaxial stomata present; subsidiary cells always with wax depos-
its, often in the form of a solid plug blocking the stomatal aper-
ture.
7. Costal silica bodies in short chains; usually dumbbell-shaped with
the central part only visibly by varying focus.
8. Costal and intercostal prickles present; all taxa with the macrohair-
like type of prickle; asperites sometimes occur.
9. Microhairs elongate with markedly tapering distal cell.
10. Epicuticular wax always present.
Distinguished by:
Spikelets small, and first sterile lemma well developed, and glumes
short, and sterile lemmas constricted at base, lacking appendages, and
lemma sides glabrous. Raised abaxial epidermal long cells absent and
stomata with wax plugs.
CALYCINA GROUP
Included taxa (Smook & Gibbs Russell 1985)
E. brevifolia Schrad.
var. brevifolia
var. cuspidata Nees
E. calycina J. E. Sm.
E. delicatula (Nees) Stapf
E. longigluma C. E. Hubb.
E. melicoides Thunb.
E. pusilla Nees ex Trin.
Morphogical description
1. Perennial or annual.
2. Culms herbaceous.
3. No parts bulbous.
4. Leaf ligules glabrous or ciliate.
5. Leaf blades expanded.
6. Spikelets many.
7. Spikelets 3, 2-8, 5 mm long.
8. Glumes two thirds longer than lemma length.
9. First sterile lemma not reduced, veined.
10. Second sterile lemma base not stipitate, with ear-like appendages.
11. Sterile lemma surface smooth.
12. Sterile lemma sides glabrous or hairy.
13. Sterile lemma bases hairy (but not conspicuously bearded) in hairy
taxa, but glabrous taxa not bearded.
14. Sterile lemma tips mucronate or rounded.
Anatomical description
1. Keel absent, except in some specimens of E. calycina and
E. brevifolia var. cuspidata.
2. Slight adaxial ribs and furrows; may be well developed in
E. calycina and E. melicoides and may be absent in E. calycina
and E. brevifolia var. cuspidata; raised, inflated abaxial epidermal
cells always present in mid-intercostal zones.
3. Mesophyll generally compact of irregular (usually quite large),
straight-walled cells; air spaces small; chlorenchyma cells often
striated and refractive, possibly silicified.
4. Costal and intercostal zones clearly differentiated.
5. Mid-intercostal long cells elongated, fusiform (more than 25 /am
long); raised; with straight walls; shorter in E. longigluma; these
cells often stain in E. calycina and E. melicoides.
6. Abaxial stomata always present; pore aperture often obscured by
cubical wax granules.
7. Costal silica bodies in short chains; variably dumbbell-shaped of
the type which varies in shape with differing focus.
8. Costal and intercostal prickles present; sometimes with short barbs
only (E. pusilla) but otherwise all taxa with macrohair type of
prickle.
9. Microhairs finger-like with tapering distal cell.
10. Epicuticular wax always developed.
Distinguished by:
Spikelets small, and glumes long, and first sterile lemma well
developed, and second sterile lemma base not stipitate, with ear-like
appendages. Raised mid-intercostal long cells and cubical wax
granules associated with stomata.
VILLOSA GROUP
Included taxa (Smook & Gibbs Russell 1985)
E. gigantea Thunb.
E. villosa Schult. f.
var. maxima Stapf
var. villosa
Morphological description
1. Perennial.
2. Suffrutescent.
3. Rhizome intemodes sub-bulbous fE. gigantea).
4. Leaf ligules ciliate.
5. Leaf blades reduced, rolled.
6. Spikelets many.
7. Spikelets 10-18 mm long.
8. Glumes one half to longer than lemma length.
9. First sterile lemma not reduced, veined.
10. Second sterile lemma base stipitate, lacking appendages.
1 1 . Sterile lemma surface smooth.
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
63
12. Sterile lemma sides profusely hairy.
13. Sterile lemma bases conspicuously bearded.
14. Sterile lemma tips mucronate.
Anatomical description
1 . Keel absent; median vascular bundle identical to lateral first order
bundles.
2. Adaxial ribs and furrows present; well developed; rounded ribs of
medium size.
3. Mesophyll semi-radiate of large, angular cells; abaxial layer of
chlorenchyma regular and somewhat palisade-like in arrangement.
4. Costal and intercostal zones differentiated.
5. Intercostal long cells rectangular in shape; sinuous walls; some-
times mid-intercostal long cells tend to be hexagonal.
6. Abaxial stomata present; sunken and overarched by four papilla-
like flanges from the adjacent epidermal cells.
7. Costal silica bodies absent or irregular in occurrence; single or
paired; round in shape.
8. Prickles absent (E. villosa) or costal and intercostal prickles
present (E. gigantea); hairs not macrohair-like.
9. Microhairs rather short but with tapering distal cell.
10. Epicuticular wax present but variable.
Distinguished by:
Culms over 1 m long, suffrutescent. Leaf blades reduced, rolled.
Spikelets very large, lemmas profusely hairy and conspicuously
bearded, stipitate, mucronate. Stomata with four epidermal flanges.
RAMOSA GROUP
Included taxa (Smook & Gibbs Russell 1985)
E. ramosa (Thunb. ) Thunb.
E. rehmannii Stapf
var. rehmannii
var. filiformis Stapf
E. subspicata Stapf
Morphological description
1. Perennial.
2. Herbaceous or suffrutescent.
3. Upper intemodes sometimes form bulbous galls in E. ramosa and
E. rehmannii var. filiformis.
4. Leaf ligules ciliate.
5. Leaf blades expanded to rolled in herbaceous taxa, absent or very
reduced in suffrutescent E. ramosa.
6. Spikelets few.
7. Spikelets 5, 5-8, 8 mm long.
8. Glumes two thirds longer than lemma length.
9. First sterile lemma not reduced, veined.
10. Second sterile lemma not stipitate.
1 1 . Sterile lemma surface rough.
12. Sterile lemma sides glabrous (few short hairs in E. rehmannii var.
rehmannii).
13. Sterile lemma bases bearded.
14. Sterile lemma tips truncate, not mucronate.
Anatomical description
1 . No keel; median vascular bundle only.
2. Ribs and furrows either absent or very slight ribs only present.
3. Mesophyll compact of small to medium, angular, isodiametric
chlorenchyma cells.
4. Costal and intercostal zones differentiated.
5. Intercostal long cells rectangular but tending to hexagonal shape in
mid-intercostal files in a few specimens; walls always sinuous.
6. Abaxial stomata present; no associated wax deposits; with distinct
stomatal rims.
7. Costal silica bodies single or paired; irregular in shape being short
dumbbell-shaped to rounded.
8. Costal and intercostal prickles present; with short to long barbs but
not of the macrohair-like type.
9. Microhairs with distal cell not tapering.
10. Epicuticular wax absent.
Distinguished by:
Spikelets small, and sterile lemmas well developed, with tips
rounded, sides rough and glabrous, bases glabrous and with basal
appendages. Stomata with distinct rims and no wax deposits.
DURA GROUP
Included taxa (Smook & Gibbs Russell 1985)
£. dura Nees ex Trin.
E. microlaena Nees ex Trin.
Morphological description
1. Perennial.
2. Herbaceous.
3. No parts bulbous.
4. Leaf ligules glabrous.
5. Leaf blades well developed (setaceous inf. dura).
6. Spikelets many.
7. Spikelets 9-17 mm long.
8. Glumes W-'/i lemma length.
9. First sterile lemma not reduced, veined.
10. Second sterile lemma base not stipitate, lacking appendages.
1 1 . Sterile lemma surface rough.
12. Sterile lemma sides glabrous.
13. Sterile lemma bases bearded.
14. Sterile lemma tips long awned.
Anatomical description
1 . No keel or midrib present.
2. Well developed adaxial ribs and furrows; ribs flat-topped and
furrows cleft-like.
3. Mesophyll compact, of large angular cells; airspaces not visible.
4. Costal and intercostal zones differentiated.
5 . Intercostal long cells rectangular with slightly sinuous walls; tanni-
niferous cells.
6. Abaxial stomata present; pore obscured by dense accumulation of
wax platelets.
7. Costal silica bodies single or paired; irregularly dumbbell-shaped.
8. Costal prickles only; with very short barbs.
64
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
9. Microhairs very variable; with sharply tapering point or distal cell
blunt; distal cell apparently not dehiscent.
10. Epicuticular wax absent except in association with the stomata.
Distinguished by:
Spike lets very large, lemmas glabrous. Plants perennial and spike-
lets awned. Tanniniferous cells present and stomatal pores obscured by
wax platelets.
CONCLUSIONS
A better understanding of the taxonomy and systema-
tics of Ehrharta is needed because its morphological and
anatomical variation and its geographic distribution indi-
cate that the genus may provide important clues towards
understanding the natural relationships of the Poaceae.
The southern African species fall into seven groups
based on both spikelet morphology and vegetative ana-
tomy, while the vegetative macromorphology exhibits
parallelism and/or convergence between the groups. The
series of papers to follow will relate the details of mor-
phological and anatomical structure of each species
group to the interpretation of relationships within
Ehrharta, as it is presently circumscribed and within the
rest of the grass family.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank L. Smook for support in field and herba-
rium; W. Roux and H. Ebertsohn for technical assis-
tance; A. J. Romanowski for photography; and S. M.
Perold for electron microscopy. We are especially grate-
ful to J. F. Veldkamp and S. A. Renvoize for meticulous
reviewing of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
AVDULOV, N. P. 1931. Karyo-systematische UntersuchungderFam-
ilie Gramineen. Bulletin on Applied Botany, of Genetics and Plant
Breeding, Supplement 43.
BENTHAM, G. & HOOKER, J. D. 1883. Genera plantarum, Vol. 3,
Part I. Reeve, London.
BREAKWELL, E. 1914. A study of the leaf anatomy of some native
species of the genus Andropogon N.O. Gramineae. Proceedings
of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 39: 385-394.
CHIPPINDALL, L. 1955. A guide to the identification of grasses in
South Africa. In C. Meredith, The grasses and pastures of South
Africa. Central News Agency, Cape Town.
CLAYTON, W. D. 1970. Gramineae. Part 1 In E. Milne-Redhead &
R. M. Polhill, Flora of tropical east Africa. Crown Agents, Lon-
don.
CLIFFORD, H. T. & WATSON, L. 1977. Identifying grasses: data,
methods and illustrations. University of Queensland Press, St
Lucia, Queensland.
FEDER, N. & O’BRIEN, O. P. 1968. Plant microtechnique: some
principles and new methods. American Journal of Botany 55:
123-142.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G. E. 1984a. A new species of Ehrharta (Poa-
ceae). Bothalia 15: 145-147.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G. E. 1984b. Notes on species of Ehrharta with a
short first sterile lemma (Poaceae). Botlmlia 15: 149-151.
GMELIN, J. F. 1791. Caroli a Linne Systema Naturae, edn 13, vol. 2.
Beer, Leipzig.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1978. Analysis of the flora of southern Africa: its
characteristics, relationships and origins. Annals of the Missouri
Botanical Garden 65: 369-436.
HACKEL, E. 1887. Gramineen. In H. G. A. Engler & K. A. E.
Prantl, Die Naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien 2,2.
HUBBARD, C. E. 1933. Notes on African grasses XIV. Kew Bulletin
1933:498-502.
JACQUES-FELIX, H. 1962. Les Graminees ( Poaceae ) d'Afrique Tro-
picale I. Institut de Recherches Agronomiques Tropicales, Paris.
JOHANSEN, D. A. 1940. Plant microtechnique. McGraw-Hill, New
York.
KUNTH, C. S. 1829. Revision des Graminees. J. Tatsu, Paris.
KUNTZE, C. E. 0. 1891 . Revisio generum plantarum. Felix, Leipzig.
LAMARCK, J. B. A. P. M. de. 1786. Encyclopedic methodique.
Botanique, vol. 2. Panckouke, Paris.
LAUNERT, E. 1961. Eine neue Art der Gattung Ehrharta Thunb.
(Gramineae). Mitteilungen aus der Botanischen Staatssammlung ,
MiinchenA : 161-163.
LINDER, H. P. 1985. Conspectus of the African species of Restiona-
ceae. Bothalia 15: 387-503.
LINNAEUS, C. 1781. Supplementum plantarum. Impenfis Orphano-
trophei, Brunsvigae.
LINNAEUS, C. 1830. Systema vegetabilium 7, 2. Ed. J. J. Roemer &
J. A. Schultes. Cottae, Stuttgardt.
LINK, J. H. F. 1827. Hortus regius botanicus berolinensis, vol. 1.
Reimer, Berlin.
METCALFE, C. R. 1960. Anatomy of the Monocotyledons. I. Grami-
neae. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
MEZ, C. 1921. Gramineae novae vel minus cognitae. IV. Repertorium
specierum novarum regni vegetabilis 17: 291-303.
NEES AB ESENBECK, C. G. 1832. Plantae Ecklonianae. Gramineae.
Linnaea 7: 273-356.
NEES AB ESENBECK, C. G. 1839. In C. B. Trinius, Phalarideae.
Zapiski Imperatorskoi akademii nauk, ser. 6, 3: 59.
NEES AB ESENBECK, C. G. 1841. Florae Africae Australioris.
Prausnitizianis, Cracow.
NEUMANN, A. J., RUSHING, A. E. & MUELLER, D. M. J. 1982.
A modified, short protocol for preparation of Bryophytes for scan-
ning electron microscopy. The Bryologist 85: 74-78.
NEVSKI, S. A. 1937. Beitrage zur Flora des Kuhitang-tau und seiner
Vorgebirge. Acta Instituti botanici Academiae scientiarum URSS,
ser. 1,4: 199-244.
PALISOT DE BEAUVOIS, A. M. F. J. 1812. Essai d’une nouvelle
agrostographie. Imprimerie de Fain, Paris.
PILGER, R. 1955. Das System der Gramineae. Botanische Jahrbiicher
76:281-384.
PRAT, H. 1960. Vers une classification naturelle des Graminees. Bul-
letin Societe botanique de France 76: 32-79.
REEDER, J. R. 1957. The embryo in grass systematics. American
Journal of Botany 44: 756-769.
RENVOIZE, S. A. 1981. The subfamily Arundinoideae and its posi-
tion in relation to a general classification of the Gramineae. Kew
Bulletin 36: 85-102.
RENVOIZE, S. A. 1985. A survey of leaf-blade anatomy in grasses.
V. The bamboo allies. Kew Bulletin 40: 509-535.
RICHARD, L. C. M. 1799. Journal de Physique 13: 225.
RUTHERFORD, M. C. & WESTFALL, R. H. 1986. The biomes of
southern African — an objective categorization. Memoirs of the
Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 54.
SCHRADER, H. A. 1821. Analecta ad floram Capensem. Sect. II.
Cyperaceae. Gramineae. Gottingische gelehrte Anzeigen 1821:
2065-2079.
SCHULTES, J. H. 1830. In C. Linnaeus, Systema vegetabilium 7, 2.
Ed. J. J. Roemer & J. A. Schultes, Cottae, Stuttgart.
SMITH, J. E. 1789. Plantarum icones hactenus inediiae 1. J. Davis,
London.
SMITH, J. E. 1790. Plantarum icones hactenus ineditae 2. J. Davis,
London.
SMOOK, L. & GIBBS RUSSELL, G. E. 1985. Poaceae In G. E.
Gibbs Russell et a!., List of species of southern African plants,
edn 2, part I: 45-70. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South
Africa No. 51 .
SODERSTROM, T. R. & ELLIS, R. P. in prep. The position of
bamboo genera and allies in a system of grass classification.
Smithsonian Contributions to Botany.
STAPF, O. 1900. Gramineae. In W. T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora capen-
sis 8: 310-750.
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
65
STEBBINS, G. L. & CRAMPTON, B. 1961. A suggested revision of
the grass genera of temperate North America. Recent advances in
botany. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
STEUDEL, E. G. 1829. Bemerkungen liber einige Cyperaceen und
Gramineen vom Vorgebirge der guten Hoffnung. Flora (Jena) 12:
491.
STEUDEL, E. G. 1853. Synopsis plantarum graminearum. Metzler,
Stuttgart.
SWARTZ, O. 1802. The botanical history of the genus Ehrharta.
Trans-actions of the Linnean Society 6: 40-64.
TATEOKA, T. 1957. A new phylogenetic system of Poaceae. Journal
of Japanese Botany 32: 275-287.
TATEOKA, T. 1963. Notes on some grasses. XII. Relationships
between Oryzeae and Ehrharteae, with special reference to leaf
anatomy and histology. The Botanical Gazette 124: 264-270.
TAYLOR, H. C. 1978. Capensis. In M. J. A. Werger, Biogeography
and ecology of southern Africa 1 . Junk, The Hague.
THUNBERG, C. P. 1779. Kungliga Sven ska vetenskapsakademiens
handlingar 40: 217.
THUNBERG, C. P. 1794. Prodromus plantarum capensium Edman,
Uppsala.
THUNBERG, C. P. 1823. Flora capensis. Cottae, Stuttgart.
TRINIUS, C. B. 1839. Phalarideae. Memoires de I'Academie imperial
des Sciences de St-Petersbourg, ser. 6. 5: 12-26.
VOSS, E. G. et al. 1983. International code of botanical nomencla-
ture. In Regnum Vegetabile 111. Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema,
Utrecht.
WATSON, L., CLIFFORD, H. T. & DALLWITZ, M. J. 1985. The
classification of Poaceae: subfamilies and supertribes. Australian
Journal of Botany 33: 433-484.
WILLEMSE, L. P. M. 1982. A discussion of the Ehrharteae (Grami-
neae) with special reference to the Malesian taxa formerly
included in Microlaena. Blumea 28: 181-194.
.
Bothalia 17,1:67-73(1987)
Taxonomy of the genus Ehrharta (Poaceae) in southern Africa: the
Setacea group
G. E. GIBBS RUSSELL*
Keywords: Fynbos, Capensis, Ehrharta, Poaceae, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
The Setacea species group in the genus Ehrharta Thunb. is differentiated morphologically by the short first sterile
lemma and by inflorescences of fewer than 20 spikelets. The Setacea group is composed of two species, each with
subspecies linked by intraspecific intermediates: E. rupestris Nees ex Trin. subsp. rupestris ; subsp. tricostata (Stapf) Gibbs
Russell; subsp. dodii (Stapf) Gibbs Russell and E. setacea Nees subsp. setacea ; subsp. scabra (Stapf) Gibbs Russell; subsp.
uniflora (Burch, ex Stapf) Gibbs Russell; subsp. disticha Gibbs Russell. All taxa are endemic to the Fynbos vegetation of
the south-western Cape Province, with distribution centred in the Caledon degree grid (3419). Parallel trends for plant size
and habit, leaf blade width and position, and spikelet size are demonstrated in both species, with similar plant types
occurring in similar geographical areas.
UITTREKSEL
Die Setacea-spesiegroep in die genus Ehrharta Thunb. word morfologies onderskei deur die kort eerste steriele lemma
en deur bloeiwyses van minder as 20 blompakkies. Die Setacea-groep bestaan uit twee spesies, elk met subspesies wat deur
intraspesifieke oorgangsvorme by mekaar aansluit: E. rupestris Nees ex Trin. subsp. rupestris ; subsp. tricostata (Stapf)
Gibbs Russell; subsp. dodii (Stapf) Gibbs Russell en E. setacea Nees subsp. setacea ; subsp. scabra (Stapf) Gibbs Russell;
subsp. uniflora (Burch, ex Stapf) Gibbs Russell; subsp. disticha Gibbs Russell. Alle taksons is endemies in die Fynbos-
plantegroei van die suidwestehke Kaap-provinsie, met die verspreiding in die Caledon-gradevierkant (3419) gesentreer.
Parallelle neigings in plantgrootte en -groeiwyse, breedte en posisie van die blaarskyf, en grootte van die blompakkies word
in albei spesies aangetoon, met soortgelyke planttipes wat in soortgelyke geografiese gebiede voorkom.
INTRODUCTION
The genus Ehrharta in Africa comprises 35 species
and infraspecific taxa, and has been divided into seven
species groups by correlating many characters of spikelet
morphology and leaf blade anatomy, as outlined by
Gibbs Russell & Ellis (1987). The leaf blade anatomy in
Ehrharta shows a wide range of variation. Characters
that normally separate groups at subfamily level else-
where in Poaceae are here used to distinguish species
groups. A detailed treatment of variation within each
species and species group is therefore called for. Ellis
(1987) demonstrates the variation and discusses the sig-
nificance of leaf anatomy in the Setacea species group.
This paper presents the taxonomy of the species in the
Setacea group, and places the morphology of the taxa in
context with the anatomy, and with the geographical
distribution. The other species groups will be similarly
treated in parallel papers in the future.
The seven species groups in Ehrharta may be classi-
fied into two major categories, those with the first and
second sterile lemmas similar to each other and different
from the fertile lemma (28 species and infraspecific taxa,
in six species groups), and those with the first sterile
lemma reduced and glume-like, and the fertile lemma
similar to the second sterile lemma (seven species and
infraspecific taxa in one species group, the Setacea
group, Figure 1). In addition, only in the Setacea group
is the number of spikelets always fewer than 20 per inflo-
rescence. Ellis (1987) has distinguished the Setacea
group anatomically by the presence of arm cells in the
* Botanical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and Water
Supply, Private BagXIOl, Pretoria 0001.
mesophyll (a character normally of significance at sub-
family level in grass classification), the shape of the
microhairs, the silica bodies and the intercostal long
cells. Detailed morphological and anatomical descrip-
tions of the Setacea group are given by Gibbs Russell &
Ellis (1987).
FIGURE 1. — Spikelet of E. rupestris subsp. tricostata: a, whole
spikelet; b, glumes; c, first sterile lemma; d, fertile lemma; e,
second sterile lemma (Esterhuysen 26708) (x6).
Within what is now regarded as the Setacea group,
Nees (1841) recognized two species, and the fundamen-
tal difference of their spikelet plan from that of the rest of
the genus was demonstrated by Steudel (1853). Stapf
(1900) added three new species and a variety, but Gibbs
Russell (1984) placed all of Stapf s taxa, plus an additio-
nal one, as subspecies within Nees’s original two
species. These decisions, based on macromorphology
and spikelet morphology, are generally supported by
68
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
anatomical studies (Ellis 1987). In most cases, anatomi-
cal characters have allowed better interpretation of con-
fusing morphological states; in other cases, morphologi-
cal and anatomical evidence do not agree. Some of the
variation in the Setacea group, where morphological and
anatomical characters are contradictory, may be a result
of convergent adaptations for tough, long-lived leaves
often encountered in plants of the low-nutrient Fynbos
soils.
In Africa, Ehrharta is a genus characteristic of the
winter rainfall areas, and has its centre of diversity in
Fynbos, but a number of species also occur in Succulent
Karoo, Karoo, Savanna and Forest. Six of the species
groups have taxa in more than one vegetation type. The
Setacea group is unique in being restricted to Fynbos,
and occurs only from the Cape Peninsula north to
Worcester and east to Humansdorp.
KEY TO SPECIES IN THE SETACEA GROUP
Glumes about 'A as long as spikelet 1 E. rupestris
Glumes more than 2A (very rarely only XA) as long as
spikelet 2. E. setacea
1. Ehrharta rupestris Nees ex Trin. in M6moires
de l’Acad6mie imp6riale des Sciences de St-P6tersbourg,
s£r. 6,5: 25 (1839); Nees: 227 (1841); Stapf: 668 (1900);
Chippind.: 37 (1955). Type: Cape Province, Caledon
Distr., Gnadenthal, Drige (K, isosyn.!; SAM, isosyn.!;
PRE, photo.!, fragment!).
Trochera rupestris (Nees) Kuntze: 795 (1891).
Erect or trailing tufted perennial with long creeping
rhizomes, of widely varying size and habit, from delicate
herbaceous plants 100 mm tall to robust suffrutescent
plants 450 mm tall. Culms erect or decumbent, branched
and creeping at base, leafless below. Leaves with blades
erect or spreading, inrolled, folded or flat; ligule a
membrane fringed with hairs; sheaths overlapping.
Inflorescence an erect raceme overtopping leaves. Spike -
lets 1-9, erect, often distichous. Glumes about 'A length
of entire spikelet, lower ones with tip truncate or
rounded, upper ones acute. Florets with sterile lemmas
dissimilar, the first sterile lemma a thin scale with 3-5
raised nerves, XA-'A the length of second, often appear-
ing to be a third glume; the second sterile lemma hard
and thickened, with 7 minutely tubercled nerves, tip
canoe-shaped; fertile lemma similar to second sterile
lemma, but slightly shorter, broader and with more acute
tip. Stamens 6.
(a) subsp. rupestris. Gibbs Russell: 150 (1984).
Plants erect, robust, mat- or cushion-forming, to 300
mm tall, with strong woody rhizomes. Culms suffrutes-
cent, stiffly erect above. Leaves conspicuously disti-
chous, with blades folded, usually held outward at about
45°, or sometimes erect, 20-30 x 2-4 mm, tips hooded;
sheaths strongly overlapping, basal sheaths bladeless.
Inflorescence of 4-8 spikelets, 15-35 mm long, overtop-
ping leaves by at least 3 times its own length. Spikelets
4,5-6 mm long, to 2,5 mm across above glumes, oblong
to almost square in outline.
The folded leaf blades with hooded tips and the very
broad spikelets separate this subspecies from all other
taxa in the Setacea group. In spite of these morphologi-
cal differences, anatomical characters support the combi-
nation of subsp. rupestris and subsp. tricostata under the
same species (Ellis 1987).
The distribution of subsp. rupestris is shown in Figure
2. It is never common. It is most abundant and appears in
its typical form in the Riviersonderend Mountains of the
Caledon area. From there it extends northward and
eastward, over the Langeberg at the Clock Peaks, and
out along the dry Klein and Groot Swartberg, where the
plants are smaller. In both the Caledon area and in the
Klein Swartberg, where subsp. rupestris is sympatric
with subsp. tricostata, intermediates in leaf and spikelet
characters occur between the two subspecies.
The subspecies grows on mountain slopes among
rocks at altitudes of 910 to 1 970 m. Flowering occurs
from October to January.
A particularly robust specimen otherwise typical of
the subspecies (Van Breda 4436) was collected on
coastal sand in the Vanrhynsdorp region, well outside
the usual distribution of the subspecies, and in a different
habitat. Nevertheless, the anatomical characters closely
resemble those of other examples of subsp. rupestris
(Ellis 1987). There is some doubt about the correctness
of the label of this specimen and its locality has not been
plotted on Figure 2. A parallel example is known from
E. calycina, in a different species group, where an
extremely robust plant over 2 m tall was collected on
coastal sand near Lambert’s Bay (Gibbs Russell 5615).
Vouchers: Boucher 4201 (PRE, STE); Esterhuysen 21044 (BOL,
PRE); Pocock S72 (PRE); Thomson 2255 (PRE); Van Breda 4436
(PRE).
(b) subsp. tricostata (Stapf) Gibbs Russell in
Bothalia: 150(1984).
Ehrharta tricostata Stapf: 669 (1900); Chippind.: 35 (1955). Type:
Cape Province, French Hoek, 2 400 feet, Schlechter 9292 (K, holo.!;
PRE, iso.!).
KEY TO SUBSPECIES
la Plants delicate, herbaceous, less than 250 mm tall; inflorescence of 1-4 spikelets, barely overtopping leaves;
spikelets 4,5-5 mm long lc. E. rupestris subsp. dodii
lb Plants ± robust, herbaceous to suffrutescent, 200-450 mm tall; inflorescences of 4-9 spikelets, considerably
overtopping leaves; spikelets 4, 5-6, 3 mm long:
2a Leaf blades inrolled and appearing setaceous, erect, not distichous, or sometimes flat and ± spreading,
tips not hooded; spikelets (above glumes) to 2 mm across, linear to oblong
lb. E. rupestris subsp. tricostata
2b Leaf blades folded, somewhat thickened, distichous, usually at 45° to culm, tips hooded; spikelets (above
glumes) to 2,5 mm across, oblong to nearly square la. E. rupestris subsp. rupestris
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
69
18° 20° 22° 24°
FIGURE 2. — Distribution of E. rupestris subsp. rupestris.
Plants erect, tufted, rarely trailing, 200-450 mm tall,
with creeping rhizomes. Culms suffrutescent (rarely her-
baceous). Leaves with baldes usually inrolled and
appearing setaceous, often reduced, erect, or sometimes
flat and spreading, not distichous, to 100 x 2,5 mm, tips
tapering, acute; sheaths not strongly overlapping, basal
leaves with blades. Inflorescence of 4-9 spikelets, 18-40
mm long, usually considerably overtopping leaves.
Spikelets 4, 6-6, 3 mm long, to 2 mm across above
glumes, oblong to linear.
In its size, erect habit, and relative abundance, this
subspecies is similar to E. setacea subsp. setacea but it
may be distinguished by the leaves at the base of the
culm. E. rupestris subsp. tricostata has blade-bearing
leaves nearly to the culm base, whereas E. setacea
subsp. setacea has scale-like, overlapping, bladeless
sheaths on the lower part of the culms.
The distribution of subsp. tricostata is shown in
Fugure 3. It is the most common and the most wide-
spread of all seven taxa in the Setacea group, extending
from the mountains of the Peninsula north to the Hex
River Mountains, and eastward to the Klein Swartberg
and along the Outeniqua and Tsitsikama coastal ranges
nearly to Humansdorp. The subspecies is not recorded
from the Langeberg. Plants from the Peninsula and Cale-
don are the most robust and erect, with reduced seta-
ceous leaf blades; plants from the easternmost end of the
range are small and fine, although with suffrutescent
culm bases; plants from the Hex River Mountains merge
into subsp. dodii and are decumbent, herbaceous and
have flat leaf blades. All these forms grade gradually
into each other. In addition, intermediates link this
subspecies with the other two, which might be
considered extreme forms. It is clear on anatomical
grounds (Ellis 1987) that the smaller form of subsp. tri-
costata from the eastern part of the range is distinct from
the small subsp. dodii, even though they overlap in size.
The subspecies grows in wet places on mountain
slopes and at the base of cliffs, at altitudes of 300-2 030
m. Flowering extends from October to February, with
most plants flowering in November and December.
Vouchers: Ellis 2547 (PRE); Esterhuysen 28594 (BOL, PRE, STE);
32813 (BOL, PRE, STE); 33057 (BOL, PRE, STE); Fourcade 3132
(BOL, PRE, STE).
18° 20° 22° 24°
FIGURE 3. — Distribution of E. rupestris subsp. tricostata.
(c) subsp. dodii (Stapf) Gibbs Russell in Bothalia:
150(1984).
Ehrharta dodii Stapf: 670 (1900); Chippind.: 35 (1955). Type: Cape
Province, rocks on Constantia Berg, Wolley Dod 1961 (K, holo. ! ;
BOL, iso.!; PRE, photo.!, fragment!).
Differs from subsp. tricostata mainly in size, habit
and in number of spikelets. Plants are less than 250 mm
tall, trailing or rarely erect, and rhizomes, culms, and
leaves are herbaceous and delicate, with the culms freely
branched and the leaf blades inrolled and held erect.
Inflorescence of 1-4 spikelets, 5-10 mm long, barely
overtopping leaves. Spikelets 4,5-5 mm long, to 2 mm
across above glumes.
This subspecies is difficult to distinguish except on
glume length from the two small, delicate subspecies of
E. setacea. In general, E. rupestris subsp. dodii is trail-
ing or erect, with erect rolled leaf blades, whereas E.
setacea subsp. uniflora is also trailing, but usually has
flat leaf blades, and E. setacea subsp. disticha is erect
with spreading, rolled or folded leaf blades. However, in
each taxon the habit is variable to some extent.
The distribution of subsp. dodii is shown in Figure 4.
It has the most restricted range of any subspecies of
E. rupestris, occurring only from Constantia Berg on the
Peninsua around to Kogelberg, and northward through
Hottentots Holland and Franschhoek to the Hex River
Mountains. It is connected in the eastern part of its range
to subsp. tricostata by intermediates of slightly larger
stature, upright habit and with more numerous spikelets.
These occur within the range of typical subsp. dodii as
well as to the east as far as Montagu. The lax Hex River
Mountain form of subsp. tricostata should perhaps be
counted among these intermediates.
The subspecies grows in wet places on mountainsides
among rocks and at the bases of cliffs, at altitudes of
660-1 660 m. Flowering occurs from November to early
January.
Vouchers: Boucher 2039 (PRE, STE); Ellis 2286 (PRE); Esterhuy-
sen 33065 (BOL, PRE); 33084 (BOL, JF, PRE); 34169 (BOL, PRE).'
70
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
FIGURE 4. — Distribution of E. rupestris subsp. dodii.
2. Ehrharta setacea Nees, Florae Africae Austra-
lioris: 228 (1841). Stapf: 668 (1900); Chippind.: 37
(1955). Type: Cape Province, in monte tabulari, alt.
3 000 ft, Drige (PRE, isosyn. , fragment!).
Erect or trailing tufted perennials with long creeping
rhizomes, sometimes stoloniferous, of widely varying
size and habit, from delicate herbaceous plants 100 mm
tall to robust suffrutescent plants 600 mm tall. Culms
decumbent or prostrate, suffrutescent or herbaceous,
often leafless below. Leaves with blades erect, recurved
or spreading, inrolled, folded or flat; ligule a membrane
fringed with hairs; sheaths overlapping. Inflorescence an
erect raceme barely to considerably overtopping leaves.
Spikelets 1-15, at first erect but spreading at anthesis.
Glumes A (very rarely only A) as long as to longer than
lemmas, both acute. Florets as in E. rupestris.
(a) subsp. setacea. Gibbs Russell: 150 (1984).
Plant erect, 250-400 mm tall. Culms suffrutescent,
branched near base, bare of leaves below, sometimes
with much shortened inflated side branches. Leaves with
blades hard, smooth, usually tightly inrolled and appear-
ing setaceous, straight and erect or curved outward and
spreading from the middle, 50-80 (110) x 4 mm;
sheaths overlapping at upper intemodes, basal sheaths
without leaves, yellowish, truncate, slightly spreading.
Inflorescence of 5-15 spikelets, 25-60 mm long, usually
overtopping leaves by at least its own length. Spikelets
5, 5-6, 8 mm long, oblong; glumes % as long as, to
longer than spikelet, not gaping at maturity.
This subspecies is most similar in habit and size to E.
rupestris subsp. tricostata, but that taxon has blade-bear-
ing sheaths at the lowest culm nodes, while E. setacea
subsp. setacea has conspicuous pale, bladeless, square-
topped sheaths at the lower nodes of the culm. Leaf
anatomical features (Ellis 1987) suggest that the two taxa
might be united. However, each is linked by interme-
diates to different but parallel lines of morphological
variation. The anatomical similarity, which extends even
to species in unrelated genera, is an example of conver-
gence in leaf characters common in Fynbos. It is note-
worthy that the two taxa with this typical ‘Fynbos ana-
tomy’ are the most widespread subspecies in the Setacea
group.
The distribution of subsp. setacea is shown in Figure
5. It is the western element of E. setacea, and is the most
widespread of the four subspecies, occurring from the
Cape Peninsula north to Baines Kloof and east only as
far as the Hottentots Holland and Kogelberg Mountains.
In the Klein Rivier Mountains and at Betty’s Bay in the
Caledon District it is linked to subsp. uniflora and subsp.
disticha by intermediates of smaller size and semi-herba-
ceous habit.
The subspecies grows on mountainsides in damp,
peaty or marshy places and in seepage areas, either in
shale or in sand derived from Table Mountain
Sandstone, at altitudes of 660-1 515 m. Flowering
occurs from September to December and sporadically
until April.
Vouchers: Esterhuysen 3574 (BOL, NBG, PRE); 26501 (PRE);
28669 (BOL, PRE, STE); 33245 (BOL, PRE); Wolley Dod 3334
(BOL, PRE).
FIGURE 5. — Distribution of E. setacea subsp. setacea.
KEY TO SUBSPECIES
la Plants 250-400 mm tall, erect; inflorescences of 5-17 spikelets; glumes appressed to florets at maturity:
2a Leaf blades smooth, tightly rolled, appearing setaceous, rigid, erect, straight or curved slightly outward from
middle; spikelets 5, 5-6, 8 mm long 2a. E. setacea subsp. setacea
2b Leaf blades scabrous, flat and broad (to 6 mm across) at base, rolled near tip, bent 45° outward from culm at
sheath; spikelets (6,5) 7-8 mm long 2b. E. setacea subsp. scabra
lb Plants shorter than 250 mm, sprawling or erect; inflorescences of 1-4 spikelets; glumes gaping widely (more
than 45°) at maturity:
3a Plants trailing or sprawling, culms herbaceous, lowest nodes bearing leaves with blades; spikelets 4,5-6 mm
long; glumes usually slightly longer than lemmas 2c. E. setacea subsp. uniflora
3b Plants erect, cushion-forming, culms suffrutescent at base, lowest nodes usually leafless; spikelets 4-5 mm
long; glumes usually slightly shorter than lemmas 2d. E. setacea subsp. disticha
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
71
(b) subsp. scabra (Stapf) Gibbs Russell in Bothalia:
151 (1984).
Ehrharta setacea Nees var. scabra Stapf: 669 (1900). Type: Cape,
in a mountain peak near Swellendam, Swellendam Div. , Burchell 7312
(K, holo.!; PRE, photo.!).
Plant erect, 250-600 mm tall, stoloniferous. Culms
suffrutescent, branched near base, sometimes with much
shortened side branches. Leaves with blades scabrous,
flat at base, rolled near tip, held 45° from culm at sheath,
to 30-1 10x6 mm; sheaths overlapping. Inflorescence
of 5-17 spikelets, 30-55 mm long, overtopping leaves
by at least twice its own length. Spikelets (6,5) 7-8 mm
long, oblong; glumes Vt-/ as long as lemmas, not gap-
ing at maturity.
This subspecies is easily distinguished from all other
African Ehrharta species by the scabrous leaf blades,
with a texture resembling that of a Melica or a Leersia.
Anatomically, subsp. scabra and subsp. setacea differ
considerably (Ellis 1987), raising the question whether
they should be treated as separate species. Despite their
anatomical differences and the absence of intermediates
between the two allopatric entities, they were kept as
subspecies because of the confused situation in the Cale-
don area, where intermediates occur between subsp.
setacea and subsp. scabra to both subsp. uniflora and
subsp. disticha.
The distribution of subsp. scabra is shown in Figure
6. It occurs only along the Langeberg from the Clock
Peaks above Swellendam to Garcia’s Pass, and thus
forms the eastern element of E. setacea. In the Caledon
area, it is linked through a number of intermediates to
subsp. disticha and subsp. uniflora.
The subspecies grows mostly in disturbed places on
mountainsides, such as path sides and burned clearings,
and also among rocks in seepage areas, at altitudes of
350—1 212 m. Flowering occurs from October to January
and sporadically to March.
Vouchers: Crook 2268 (PRE); Du Toit 2040 (PRE, STE); Haynes
868 (JF, PRE, STE); Taylor 4236 (PRE, STE); 7613 (PRE, STE).
FIGURE 6. — Distribution of E. setacea subsp. scabra.
(c) subsp. uniflora (Burch, ex Stapf) Gibbs Russell
in Bothalia: 151 (1984).
Ehrharta uniflora Burch, ex Stapf: 670 (1900); Chippind.: 37
(1955). Type: Cape, Cape Flats near Rondebosch, Burchell 182 (K,
holo.!; PRE, fragment!).
Plants sprawling or trailing, delicate but forming
dense masses. Culms fine, herbaceous, freely branched,
lowest nodes bearing leaves with blades. Leaves not dis-
tichous, blades soft, flat, straight, 50-80 x 2 mm;
sheaths barely or not overlapping. Inflorescence of 1-4
spikelets, 5-14 mm long, barely overtopping leaves.
Spikelets 4, 5-6, 5 mm long; glumes usually slightly
longer than lemmas but sometimes slightly shorter, gap-
ing more than 45° at maturity.
This subspecies can be distinguished from the other
two small taxa in the Setacea group by its long glumes
(E. rupestris subsp. dodii has short glumes) or trailing
habit (E. setacea subsp. disticha is erect).
The distribution of subsp. uniflora is shown in Figure
7. It is known only around False Bay, from the Cape
Peninsula to Pringle Bay. In the Caledon District inter-
mediates occur to subsp. setacea and subsp. scabra.
The subspecies grows in seepage areas, marshy places
and along watercourses, as well as at forest margins. It is
the only taxon in the Setacea group to occur at low alti-
tudes, from 10-500 m. Flowering occurs from Septem-
ber to December, and occasionally to March.
Vouchers: Adamson 1331 (BOL, PRE); Cleghorn 3168 (PRE, STE);
Esterhuysen 34002 (BOL, PRE); 34039 (BOL, NBG, PRE).
FIGURE 7. — Distribution of E. setacea subsp. uniflora.
(d) subsp. disticha Gibbs Russell in Bothalia: 151
(1984). Type: Cape, Caledon District, Maanschynkop,
Rocklands Park, Esterhuysen 31735 (PRE, holo. !; BOL,
iso.!).
Plant erect, cushion-forming, to 250 mm tall, differ-
ing from subsp. scabra mainly in size, number of spike-
lets and position of glumes. Culms branched near base,
suffrutescent, lowest nodes usually leafless. Leaves dis-
tichous, blades hard, rolled, recurved or erect, to 30 mm
long. Inflorescences of 1 or 2 spikelets, 5-10 mm long,
barely overtopping leaves. Spikelets 4-5 mm long;
glumes slightly shorter than lemmas, gaping more than
45° at maturity.
This small subspecies is separated from short-glumed
E. rupestris subsp. dodii by its long glumes, and from
lax E. setacea subsp. uniflora by its erect habit and
generally smaller spikelets with glumes slightly shorter
than the spikelet.
72
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
The distribution of subsp. disticha is shown in Figure
8. It is known only from the Babylon’s Tower and Klein
River Mountains of the Caledon area. A number of inter-
mediate specimens show that in this area it intergrades
with subsp. setacea and subsp. scabra.
The subspecies grows in dry rocky places on mountain
slopes, at altitudes of 580-1 225 m. All other taxa in the
Setacea group grow in damp or wet places. The striking
habit difference between subsp. disticha and subsp. uni-
flora may result from adaptation of the former to water
stress in a dry habitat. Flowering occurs in October and
November.
Vouchers: Esterhuysen 31735 (BOL, PRE); 32319 (BOL, PRE);
33647 (BOL, PRE); 34755 (BOL, PRE); Williams 3086 (NBG, PRE).
FIGURE 8. — Distribution of E. setacea subsp. disticha.
CONCLUSION
The Setacea group is composed of very closely related
taxa, as shown by both morphological and anatomical
characters. These taxa are distinguished from other
Ehrharta species by the spikelet plan, with a short first
sterile lemma, and by a number of anatomical features.
These distinctive characteristics indicate that the Setacea
group must be carefully reviewed when generic limits in
the Ehrharteae are examined. The Setacea group has a
more restricted distribution than any other group in the
genus. All the subspecies except E. setacea subsp. sca-
bra occur in the Caledon degree grid (3419), and exam-
ples of all the intermediates also occur in this degree
grid. Thus, the Setacea group is concentrated in the
south-western phytogeographical centre of Weimarck
(1941) and the smaller south-western centre of Oliver et
al. (1983). Outside this pivotal area, each taxon has a
distinctive distribution. Only one subspecies occurs
throughout the range of the group, E. rupestris subsp.
tricostata. The other subspecies show vicariant distribu-
tion, limited to particular mountain ranges.
Although they are very similar, the seven infraspecific
taxa recognized here are each distinguished by macro-
morphological, spikelet and anatomical differences. The
occurrence of intermediates links them into two groups
with parallel morphological trends, as shown in Table 1.
These two groups are treated as separate species, with
the linked entities which they comprise treated as sub-
species. In each species, the most widespread and com-
monly collected subspecies is a robust plant with hard
setaceous leaves: E. rupestris subsp. tricostata and
E. setacea subsp. setacea. Each species has a robust
subspecies of more restricted eastern distribution differ-
entiated from the widespread one by broader spreading
leaf blades and larger spikelets: E. rupestris subsp.
rupestris and E. setacea subsp. scabra. Each species has
little delicate subspecies with reduced inflorescences and
small spikelets in the Peninsula and Caledon area:
E. rupestris subsp. dodii, E. setacea subsp. uniflora and
E. setacea subsp. disticha. Each of these reduced taxa
has a distinctive habitat. E. rupestris subsp. dodii grows
in wet places at high altitudes, E. setacea subsp. uniflora
grows in wet places at low altitudes, and E. setacea
subsp. disticha grows in dry places at high altitudes.
Thus, the factors in the Caledon area that favour small
size are apparently independent of moisture regime and
altitude.
AKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I thank: the Directors of herbaria that have lent speci-
mens, Bolus Herbarium (BOL), University of Cape
Town; Moss Herbarium (J), University of the Witwaters-
rand, Johannesburg; Wicht Herbarium (JF), Jonkershoek
Forestry Research Centre; The Herbarium, Royal Bo-
tanic Gardens, Kew (K); National Botanic Garden,
Kirstenbosch (NBG & SAM); Botanical Research Unit,
Stellenbosch (STE). Also R. P. Ellis and W. D. Clayton
for profitable discussions, G. Condy for the spikelet
drawing, and especially W. Roux for technical assis-
tance and preparation of diagrams.
REFERENCES
CHIPPINDALL, L. 1955. A guide to the identification of grasses in
South Africa. In C. Meredith, The grasses and pastures of South
Africa. Central News Agency, Cape Town.
ELLIS, R. P. 1987. Leaf anatomy of the genus Ehrharta (Poaceae): the
Setacea group. Bothalia 17: 75-89.
TABLE 1. — Parallel trends in subspecies for the two species of the Setacea group. Arrows indicate the existence of specimens inter-
mediate between subspecies
Adaptation and distribution Plant large, robust; Plant small; Plant large, robust;
leaves setaceous, erect; leaves delicate: leaves broad, spreading;
widespread distribution 'False Bay’ distribution 'Eastern' distribution
4 >
E. rupestris subsp. tricostata < » subsp. dodii subsp. rupestris
E. setacea
subsp. setacea <-
-> subsp. uni flora f-
subsp. disticha <r
-> subsp. scabra
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
73
GIBBS RUSSELL, G. E. 1984. Notes on species of Ehrharta with a
short first sterile lemma (Poaceae). Bothalia 15: 149-151 .
GIBBS RUSSELL, G. E. & ELLIS, R. P. 1987. Species groups in the
genus Ehrharta (Poaceae) of southern Africa. Bothalia 17: 5 1-65.
KUNTZE, C. E. O. 1891. Revisio generum plantarum . Felix, Leipzig.
NEES AB ESENBECK, C. G. 1841. Florae Africae Australioris .
Prausnitzianus, Cracow.
OLIVER, E. G. H., LINDER, H. P. & ROURKE, J. P. 1983.
Geographical distribution of present-day Cape taxa and their
phytogeographical significance. Bothalia 14: 427-440.
STAPF, O. 1900. Gramineae. In W. T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora capen-
sis 8: 310-750.
STEUDEL, E. G. 1853. Synopsis plantarum graminearum. Metzler,
Stuttgart.
TRINIUS, C. B. 1839. Phalarideae. Memoires de I'Acadimie impi-
riale des Sciences de St-Petersbourg, s6r. 6, 5: 12-26.
WEIMARCK, H. 1941. Phytogeographical groups, centres and inter-
vals within the Cape flora. Lunds Univertsitets Arsskrift 37, 5:
1-143.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
Adamson 596 (2a) BOL; 616 (2a) PRE; 660 (2a) BOL; 1331 (2c) PRE,
BOL. Andreae 1283 ( lb) PRE.
Bews 15169 (2a) BOL. Bolus 7978 (lb/2a) BOL; 33866 (2a) PRE.
Bond 668 (lb) NBG. Boucher 2039 ( lc) K, PRE, STE; 2069 ( lb) PRE,
STE; 2642 (2a) STE; 2645 (lc) K, STE; 4201 (la) PRE, STE. Burchell
182 (2c) K, PRE; 7312 (2b) K, PRE; 7419 (la) K.
Cleghorn 3168 (2c) PRE, STE; 3174 (2a/2c) K, PRE, STE. Compton
15486 (2a) NBG; 17505 (2a) NBG. Crook 2268 (2b) K, PRE.
Drege 1659 (2a) PRE; 1661 (la) K, PRE; 19358 (la) SAM. Du Toil
2040 (2b) PRE, STE.
Ellis 1678 (2b) PRE; 1679 (2b) PRE; 2273 (2a) PRE; 2286 (lc) PRE;
2287 (lc) PRE; 2294 (2a) PRE; 2544 (2b) PRE; 2547 (lb) PRE; 4652
(2b) PRE; 4653 (2b) PRE; 4669 (2b/2c) PRE; 4670 (2b/j2c) PRE; 4679
(2a) PRE; 4685 (la) PRE; 4689 (2b) PRE; 4690 (lb) PRE; 4700 (lb)
PRE. Esterhuysen 1541 (lb) BOL; 3574 (2a) BOL, NBG, PRE; 6770
(lb) BOL, NBG, PRE, SAM; 9498 (2a) BOL; 10876 (lb) BOL; 10974
(lc) BOL; 21044 (la) BOL, PRE; 22354 (2a) BOL, PRE; 22676 (lc)
BOL, PRE; 24081 BOL, PRE; 26501 (2a) PRE; 26708 (la/lb) BOL,
PRE; 27368 (lb) BOL, PRE; 27558 (2b/2c) BOL, K, PRE; 28067 (2a)
BOL, PRE; 28109 (lb) BOL, K, NBG, PRE; 2«267 (lb) PRE; 28594
(lb) BOL, K, PRE, STE; 28619 (lb/lc) BOL, K, PRE; 28651a (lc)
BOL, K; 28669 (2a) BOL, K, PRE, STE; 28683 (2b/2c) BOL, K;
28712 (lb) BOL, K, PRE, STE; 28777 (2b) BOL, K, PRE; 29936
(2b/2c) BOL, K, PRE, STE; 30045a (2c) BOL; 31424 (2b/2c) BOL,
K; 31735 (2d) BOL, PRE; 32319 (2d) BOL, K, PRE; 32553 (2a) BOL;
32727 (lc) BOL, K, PRE; 32792 (lb) BOL, K, PRE; 32813 (lb) BOL,
K, PRE, STE; 33040 (2c) BOL, PRE; 33047 (lb) BOL, K, PRE;
33056 (2c) BOL, PRE, STE; 33057 (lb) BOL, K, PRE, STE; 33065
(lc) BOL, K, PRE; 33084 (lc) BOL, JF, K, PRE; 33150 (lb) BOL;
33245 (2a) BOL, PRE; 33299 (lb/lc) BOL; 33511 (lc) BOL, PRE;
33520 (lb) BOL, K; 33523 (lb) BOL, PRE; 33647 (2d) BOL, K, PRE;
33662 (2a/2c) BOL, PRE; 33724 (2c) BOL, PRE; 33733 (lc) BOL, K;
33762 (lb) BOL, K; 34002 (2c) BOL, PRE; 34039 (2c) BOL, NBG,
PRE; 34122 (lb) BOL, K, PRE; 34168 (lb/lc) BOL, PRE; 34169 (lc)
BOL, K, PRE; 34173 (lb) BOL, K, PRE; 34183 (lb) BOL, K; 34497
(lc) BOL, K; 34505 (lb) K, PRE; 34557 (lb) BOL, K; 34755 (2d)
BOL, K, PRE; 34778 (2a) BOL; 34834 (lb) BOL, PRE; 35300 (lb)
BOL, K, PRE; 35364 (la) BOL, K; 35539a (2d) BOL, K; 35571 (lb)
BOL; 35620 (lb) BOL; 35621 (la) BOL; 35733 (lb) BOL; 35812 (lc)
BOL; 35822 (2a) BOL; 35S35 (lb) BOL.
Forsyth 355 (2a) JF. Fourcade 3132 (lb) BOL, K, PRE, STE.
Galpin 164 (2a/2c) PRE, STE. Gibbs Russell 5634 (2b) BOL, K,
NBG, PRE; 5635 (2b) BOL, K, PRE; 5652 (2b/2c) BOL, K, NBG,
PRE; 5671 (2a) BOL, K, NBG, PRE; 5671a (lc) PRE; 5675 (lc) PRE;
5676 (la) BOL, K, NBG, PRE; 5678 (la) PRE; 5682 (2b) BOL, K,
NBG, PRE; 5696 (lb) BOL, K, NBG, PRE.
Haynes 868 (2b) JF, PRE, STE.
Kerfoot 5709 (lb) JF. Kruger 276 (lb) JF; 521 (2a) JF, PRE; 651 (lc)
JF; 1099 ( lb) JF, STE; 1515 ( lb) JF, STE; 1599 ( lc) JF.
Pappe53 (2a) PRE. PocockS72( la) PRE.
Schlechter 1825 (2b) BOL, K; 9292 (lb) BOL, K, PRE; 9869 (la/lb)
BOL, K, PRE. Stokoe 2537 (lb/lc) PRE; 7810 (2a) BOL; 8640 (la)
BOL; 22547 (lb) BOL; 67667 (2a) SAM; 67675 (la) SAM.
Taylor 3222 (2b) PRE, STE; 4236 (2b) PRE, STE; 7613 (2b) K, PRE,
STE; 7668 (2c) PRE. Thompson 1597 (lb) PRE, STE; 2255 (la) PRE.
Thorne 43440 (2b) SAM; 44556 (la) SAM; 45847 (la) SAM. Van
Breda 4436 (la) PRE. Van der Merwe 25-52 (2a) PRE; 933 (2a) PRE,
STE; 934 (2a) PRE, STE. Van Rensburg 215 (2a) PRE.
Williams 2887 (2d) NBG; 2963 (lb) K, NBG, PRE; 3015 ( lb) K, NBG
PRE; 3086 (2d) K, NBG, PRE; 3150 (2b/2d) K. Wolley Dod 1961 (lc)
BOL, K, PRE; 3334 (2a) BOL, K, PRE.
Zeyher 19359 (2a) SAM.
.
Bothalia 17,1:75-89(1987)
Leaf anatomy of the genus Ehrharta (Poaceae) in southern Africa:
the Setacea group
R. P. ELLIS*
Keywords: arm cells, Capensis floral kingdom, Ehrharta, E. rupestris, E. setacea, leaf anatomy, Poaceae, southern Africa, systematics
ABSTRACT
The leaf blade anatomy of the taxa of the Setacea group of species of the genus Ehrharta is described and illustrated.
This group includes E. rupestris Nees ex Trin. subsp. rupestris, subsp. tricostata (Stapf) Gibbs Russell and subsp. dodii
(Stapf) Gibbs Russell, as well as E. setacea Nees subsp. setacea, subsp. scabra (Stapf) Gibbs Russell, subsp. uniflora
(Burch, ex Stapf) Gibbs Russell and subsp. disticha Gibbs Russell. All these taxa share a very characteristic leaf anatomy
with inrolled or infolded leaves without keels and have adaxial ribs with interlocking prickles. The chlorenchyma is dense
and compact with inwardly projecting invaginations visible in all taxa except £. setacea subsp. setacea. In E. setacea
subsp. scabra typical arm cells are present. Abaxial costal and intercostal zones are not differentiated and stomata are
absent. The long cells are hexagonal or inflated with sinuous walls. Silica bodies are single or paired and rounded in shape.
Small hook-like prickles with short barbs are common. Microhairs with a short, truncated distal cell occur. This leaf
anatomical structure differs considerably from that of the other species groups recognized in African Ehrharta and the
Setacea group appears to be more distinct from the other groups than they are from each other.
UITTREKSEL
Die blaarskyfanatomie van die taksons van die Setacea-spesiegroep van die genus Ehrharta word beskryf en ge'illus-
treer. Hierdie groep sluit E. rupestris Nees ex Trin. subsp. rupestris, subsp. tricostata (Stapf) Gibbs Russell en subsp. dodii
(Stapf) Gibbs Russell asook£. setacea Nees subsp. setacea, subsp. scabra (Stapf) Gibbs Russell, subsp. uniflora (Burch,
ex Stapf) Gibbs Russell en subsp. disticha Gibbs Russell in. A1 hierdie taksons het ’n baie kenmerkende blaaranatomie
gemeen. Die blare is ingerol of ingevou, sonder ’n kiel en het adaksiale ribbe met ineensluitende dorings. Die chlorenchiem
is dig en kompak met instulpings van die selwande sigbaar in alle taksons behalwe £. setacea subsp. setacea. In £. setacea
subsp. scabra is tipiese vertakte selle teenwoordig. Die abaksiale kostale en interkostale sones is nie onderskeibaar nie en
huidmondjies is afwesig. Die langselle is seshoekkig of opgeblaas en met gekart£lde wande. Silikaliggaampies is enkel of
gepaard en het ’n ronde vorm terwyl die stekelhare met kort weerhake toegerus is. Mikrohare met ’n kort afgeknotte distale
sel kom voor. Hierdie anatomiese struktuur verskil aansienlik van die van al die ander spesiegroepe in Ehrharta in Afrika en
die Setacea-groep blyk ’n afsonderlike groep te wees wat meer van die ander groepe verskil as wat hulle van mekaar verskil.
CONTENTS
Introduction 75
Leaf anatomy of the taxa of the Setacea group
E. rupestris
subsp. rupestris 76
subsp. tricostata 78
subsp. dodii 80
E. setacea
subsp. setacea 81
subsp. scabra 83
subsp. uniflora 85
subsp. disticha 86
Discussion 86
Conclusions 89
Acknowledgements 89
References 89
INTRODUCTION
The African species of Ehrharta fall into two natural
groups: those with the first sterile lemma similar to the
second, and the fertile lemma differing from both; and
those with the first sterile lemma reduced and scale-like,
* Botanical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and Water
Supply , Private Bag X 1 0 1 , Pretoria 000 1 .
and the fertile lemma similar to the second sterile lemma
(Gibbs Russell 1984). About 20 species belong to the
first group, but the second group, to which the Setacea
group belongs, contains only two species: E. rupestris
Nees ex Trin. and E. setacea Nees, together with seven
subspecific taxa. These two species, therefore, differ
considerably in spikelet structure from the other species
groups in the genus and, morphologically, the Setacea
group appears to be rather isolated from the rest of the
genus. This paper will examine whether the leaf anatomy
of the representatives of this group confirms this obser-
vation, and will discuss the affinities of this group by
reference to the anatomical evidence.
Chippindall (1955) recognized five species with a
short sterile lemma but Gibbs Russell (1984, 1987) has
combined these into only two species, each with several
subspecies. Within each species there are parallel trends
for reduced size and spikelet number, for rolled, folded
or flat, erect or spreading leaf blades and for suffrutes-
cence. This apparently reticulate pattern of relationships,
which generally applies to the genus Ehrharta, results in
parallel or convergent trends in vegetative parts occur-
ring in different taxa recognized on the basis of spikelet
differences. It is of interest to determine whether the leaf
anatomical variation parallels that exhibited by the spike-
lets and whether it substantiates the morphological clas-
sification based on relative glume length. This paper will
copiously illustrate, describe briefly and evalute the leaf
anatomy of each of the seven subspecies of the two spe-
cies of this group with reference to the systematic posi-
tion of these taxa and of the group as a whole relative to
the genus and the higher classification of the Poaceae.
76
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
E. rupestris NeesexTrin. subsp. rupestris
Transverse section
The median vascular bundle is indistinguishable struc-
turally from the lateral first order bundles (Figure 1.1),
as is the case throughout this group. Smaller third order
bundles occur on either side of the median bundle and
near the margin (Figure 1.1; 1.3) and, perhaps, second
order bundles should be distinguishea in this taxon.
However, if these irregular ana ill-defined additional
bundles are excluded then only two smaller bundles sep-
arate consecutive first order bundles, as is the case in all
other taxa in this group. The presence of these additional
bundles is not considered to be taxonomically significant
and probably only represents individual variation in the
specimen studied.
Rounded adaxial ribs and narrow furrows are present
(Figure 1.2; 1.3), the furrows having interlocking adax-
ial prickles (Figure 2.1). Similar pnckles also occur on
subsp. tricostata but are absent on subsp. dodii.
The chlorenchyma tissue is compact, consisting of
small round cells with dense chloroplasts (Figure 1.2).
These cells do not have straight, isodiametric sides but
do have slight, but clearly discernible wall invaginations
(Figure 1.2; 1.3). According to the generally accepted
definition of arm cells, these must be considered as such
and, in fact, they do closely resemble the arm cells of the
Oryzeae and some of the other bambusoid grasses. These
invaginations are better developed in subsp. rupestris
than in either subsp. tricostata or subsp. dodii and a
definite reduction series is evident in these three subspe-
cies.
Abaxial epidermis
The epidermis conforms very closely to the type diag-
nostic for this group, with the costal and intercostal
zones being structurally undifferentiated and with the
long cells being very short and inflated to hexagonal with
sinuous walls (Figure 1.4; 1.5). Abaxial stomata were
not detected with the light microscope, neither in
FIGURE 1. — Leaf anatomy of Ehrharta rupestris subsp. rupestris. 1-5, Ellis 4685. 1-3, leaf transverse sections; 1, infolded leaf blade with
median vascular bundle (mr) only, scale = 20 /am; 2, compact mesophyll with chlorenchyma cells with slight wall invaginations, adaxial
stomata (s) only and abaxial hooks (p) with short barbs, scale = 10 /am; 3, interference contrast showing long barbs of adaxial prickles (p)
and short barbs of abaxial hooks (p), scale = 10 /xm. 4—5, abaxial epidermis: 4, costal and intercostal zones of similar cells, note
microhair (m), scale = 10 /xm; 5, costal and intercostal long cells separated by hooks, prickles (p) or silica bodies, scale = 10 /xm. 6,
abaxial epidermis of Van Breda 4436 showing costal and intercostal hooks (p) and microhairs (m), scale = 10 /xm.
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
77
FIGURE 2.— Epidermal ultrastructure of Ehrharta rupestris subsp. rupestris. 1-4, Ellis 4685. 1, adaxial epidermis showing ribs and furrows
with interlocking prickles, x 60. 2-4, abaxial epidermis: 2, epidermal zonation not evident and prickle hairs are widespread, x 60; 3,
detail of prickles, stomata and papilla-like silica bodies, x 340; 4, microhair and silica bodies, x 1000.
transverse sections (Figure 1.2; 1.3) nor in epidermal
preparations (Figure 1.4— 1.6). However, the SEM re-
vealed a few isolated stomata deeply sunken between the
inflated long cells and obscured by hooks (Figure 2.3).
Silica bodies are structurally identical throughout the
epidermis and appear as single, rounded bodies located
between the long cells (Figures 1.4; 1.5). Under the
SEM these are clearly seen to be raised, rounded struc-
tures covered with epicuticular wax (Figure 2.3; 2.4). As
such they are indistinguishable from papillae and do not
resemble the usual silica bodies with their concave faces
devoid of wax platelets. Their refractive nature is visible
with the light microscope (Figure 1.5) and they can also
be seen to be raised (Figure 1.6). They are undoubtedly
silica bodies but they are highly unusual and their exact
nature and structure remains somewhat uncertain. Com-
parable structures have not been described elsewhere in
the literature and they deserve further study. Similar
structures also occur in E. setacea and they appear to be
a unique characteristic of this group of Ehrharta species.
The entire abaxial epidermis is densely covered in
shortly barbed hooks occupying the same locations be-
tween the long cells as the silica bodies (Figure 1.6).
These hooks can occupy up to 50% of the available loca-
lities (Figure 1.6) but may be fewer in number (Figure
1.4; 1.5). The hooks with their reduced barbs may be
difficult to distinguish from the silica bodies with the
light microscope but are definitely distinct structures as
seen under the SEM (Figure 2.2; 2.3).
The microhairs of subsp. rupestris are also of interest
in that they are very short, with a blunt distal cell which
does not taper to a point (Figure 2.3; 2.4). They are
common throughout the epidermis (Figure 1.4; 1.6) and
are an important distinguishing feature between this
group and all the other groups of Ehrharta.
Specimens examined
CAPE. — 3118 (Van Rhvnsdorp): Vredendal Distr., Koekenap
(-CB), Van Breda 4436. 3319 (Worcester): Riviersonderend Mts,
Jonas Kop (-DC), Ellis 4685.
Discussion
A small and inadequate sample was studied anatomi-
cally and, consequently, little information on variation in
this subspecies can be deduced. However, the specimen
from the Van Rhynsdorp District in Succulent Karoo
comes from an atypical habitat and is particularly robust
(Gibbs Russell 1984) and yet closely resembles the spec-
imen from the Mountain Fynbos in leaf anatomy. It,
therefore appears as if the leaf anatomy of this taxon is
stable and consistent despite differing environmental
conditions.
E. rupestris subsp. rupestris is obviously very closely
related to subsp. tricostata and the two can hardly be
separated anatomically and, with a larger study sample,
can be expected to grade into one another. The cross-
sectional anatomy tends to support the diagnostic differ-
ence of folded (Figure 1.1) versus rolled (Figure 3.1;
3.4) leaf blades (Gibbs Russell 1984, 1987) even though
subsp. tricostata is not rolled in the same way as subsp.
78
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
FIGURE 3. — Transectional leaf anatomy of Ehrharta rupeslris subsp. tricostata. 1-3, Ellis 4700: 1 , inrolled leaf outline with median vascular
bundle (mr), scale = 20 /xm; 2, compact mesophyll with cells densely packed with chloroplasts, scale = 10 /xm; 3, interference contrast
showing very slight inward projections of walls of chlorenchyma cells and long barbs of adaxial prickles (p), scale = 5 gm. 4-6, Ellis
4690 : 4, infolded leaf outline, scale = 20 /xm; 5, arrangement of first and third order vascular bundles, scale = 10 /xm; 6, detail of
chlorenchyma with some cells showing slight indentations and adaxially located stomata (s) only, scale = 5 gm.
dodii (Figure 6. 1; 6.3). This morphological difference is,
therefore, not very convincing when it is analysed struc-
turally. Further anatomical studies are required to con-
firm whether these two taxa are anatomically distinct; all
indications are that only infraspecific separation is justi-
fied. This study, therefore, supports the decision of
Gibbs Russell (1984, 1987) to reclassify E. tricostata as
a subspecies of E. rupestris. It must also be noted that
these two subspecies show greater similarities with each
other than either does to subsp. dodii.
E. rupestris Nees ex Trin. subsp. tricostata (Stapf)
Gibbs Russell
Transverse section
No keels or midribs are present (Figure 3.1; 3.4) and
successive first order vascular bundles are separated by
two third order bundles (Figure 3.2; 3.5). The outline of
the lamina is very similar to that of subsp. rupestris and
these two taxa differ only in subsp. rupestris having
considerably wider leaf blades which are infolded but
with the arms of the lamina curved outwards. In subsp.
tricostata the leaf blades are narrower and setaceous with
no angle being present at the median bundle (Figure 3.1;
3.4) and these leaves can be considered as being inrolled
although the margins do not overlap as in subsp. dodii.
This distinction between subsp. tricostata and subsp.
rupestris is only minor and intermediates can be ex-
pected when a larger sample is studied. Both these
subspecies also possess a ribbed adaxial surface with
interlocking prickles overlying the furrows (Figure 3.3).
The mesophyll is compact, of small regular cells. The
cells are rounded and very tightly packed (Figure 3.3)
and closer inspection reveals very slight inward projec-
tions on only a few cell walls (Figure 3.3; 3.6). These
cells resemble arm cells but cannot be considered to be
typical and may result from reduction of the type of
invagination described in subsp. rupestris.
Abaxial epidermis
The epidermal structure is virtually identical to that of
subsp. rupestris as illustrated in Figure 4. 1-4.4. The
prickle hooks are not always very common and may lack
barbs (Figure 4.4) but the solitary, round silica bodies
are clearly visible (Figure 4.2). Ultrastructurally these
bodies are also seen to be raised and papilla-like (Figure
5.3) and not concave as typical silica bodies usually are.
The microhairs have a short, blunt distal cell (Figure 5.4)
Bothalia 17, 1 ( 1987)
79
FIGURE 4. — Abaxial epidermis of Ehrharta rupestris subsp. tricostata. 1-2, Ellis 4700: 1, costal and intercostal Files of similar composition,
scale = 10 fim; 2, interference contrast showing silica cells or hooks between all long cells, scale = 10 gm. 3—4, Ellis 4690: costal and
intercostal long cells diamond shaped, scale = 10 /am; 4, intercostal long cells with thickened, pitted walls, note microhair (m), scale =
10 /xm.
FIGURE 5. — Abaxial epidermis of Ehrharta rupestris subsp. tricostata. 1, Ellis 4690 showing absence of costal and intercostal zonation, x
60. 2-4, Ellis 4700: 2, prickles common and short long cells separated by raised silica bodies, x 200; 3, prickles with short barbs,
microhairs and long cells, x 300; 4, detail of microhair and cuticular striations on long cells, x 1000.
80
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
and are unusual in this regard in the genus. The epicuti-
cular wax layer in subsp. tricostata is very thick with
distinct horizontal striations (Figure 5.3; 5.4) and not of
fine platelets as in subsp. rupestris (Figure 2.3; 2.4).
Specimens examined
CAPE. — 3321 (Ladismith): Riversdale Distr. , Langeberg, Garcia’s
Pass (-CC), Ellis 4690. 3322 (Oudtshoom): Outeniqua Mts, Robin-
son’s Pass (-CC), Ellis 2547, 4700.
Discussion
Anatomically subsp. tricostata is very similar indeed
to subsp. rupestris and these two taxa cannot be satisfac-
torily distinguished on anatomical criteria. This is sup-
portive of their separation at only the subspecies level
(Gibbs Russell 1984) and the leaf anatomy confirms the
extremely close relationship of these two taxa. The re-
cognition of two separate species is not corroborated by
the anatomical evidence.
E. rupestrisNees ex Trin. subsp. dodii (Stapf) Gibbs
Russell
Transverse section
No keel is present (Figure 6.1; 6.3) and the adaxial
ribs and furrows are not well developed and interlocking
prickles are absent (Figure 6.2). Of particular interest is
the convolute inrolling of the leaf blade (Figure 6.1;
6.3). This type of inrolling does not occur in either
subsp. rupestris or subsp. tricostata and appears to be a
significant anatomical difference between these two
subspecies and subsp. dodii.
The mesophyll tissue is compact, of small rounded
and regular cells (Figure 6.2). These cells cannot be
regarded as being typical arm cells as they possess only
very slight invaginations.
Abaxial epidermis
The costal and intercostal zones are structurally undif-
ferentiated although their relative positions can be deter-
mined due to the staining of the sclerenchyma girders
underlying the costal zones (Figure 6.4). The long cells
are considerably longer and less inflated than in either of
the other two subspecies of E. rupestris. All three
subspecies do have sinuous long cell walls and stomata
are either very rare (subsp. rupestris ) or absent from the
abaxial surface. The silica bodies are also rounded but
they are closely associated with a cork cell. Although
these structures were not examined ultrastructurally,
there can be little doubt that they are typical graminoid
silica bodies and not the unusual type described in subsp.
tricostata and subsp. rupestris. Prickles with prominent
oval bases and very short barbs are common (Figure
6.4). Small microhairs, typical of those of the Setacea
group, are also present (Figure 6.4).
Specimens examined
CAPE. — 3418 (Simonstown): Hottentot Hollands Mts, Sir Lowry’s
Pass (-BB), Ellis 2286, 2287; Kogelberg State Forest, Platberg (-BD),
Boucher 2039.
Discussion
In its leaf anatomy E. rupestris subsp. dodii differs
more from subsp. rupestris and subsp. tricostata than
FIGURE 6. — Leaf anatomy of Ehrharta rupestris subsp. dodii. 1-3, leaf in transverse section. 1-2, Ellis 2286: 1 , inrolled outline with simple
median vascular bundle (mr), scale = 10 gm; 2, compact mesophyll of rounded cells with slight wall indentations, scale = 5 p m. 3, Ellis
2287, showing inrolled outline, few adaxial prickles and simple median bundle (mr), scale = 10 /am. 4, abaxial epidermis, Ellis 2287,
note absence of stomata, microhairs (m), costal prickles (p) and intercostal hooks, scale = 5 pm.
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
81
these two subspecies differ from one another. The find-
ings of this study, based on only a very small sample,
appear to indicate that subsp. dodii is sufficiently distinct
from E. rupestris to warrant separate specific status.
Additional anatomical material may reveal anatomical
intermediates with subsp. tricostata but this appears
rather unlikely in view of the entirely different nature of
the involution of the blades of these two taxa. The con-
volute type of inrolling in subsp. dodii may indicate a
different type of bud vernation to that of subsp. trico-
stata where inrolling is of the involute type. If this
proves to be true then the case for separation at the spec-
ies level will be strengthened.
Although subsp. dodii differs somewhat from subsp.
rupestris and subsp. tricostata in leaf anatomy, their
anatomy is still typical of the Setacea group and different
from that of all the others of Ehrharta (Gibbs Russell &
Ellis 1987). Subsp. dodii, therefore, unquestionably be-
longs to this very distinct group.
The less acicular type of leaf transection and the
elongation of the epidermal long cells seems to be paral-
lelled in E. setacea in subsp. disticha and subsp. uni-
flora. This trend may be related to the milder climate of
the Cape Peninsula and Caledon District to which these
three taxa are restricted. These three subspecies do not
occur at higher altitudes in the mountain ranges further
inland as do E. rupestris subsp. rupestris and subsp.
tricostata and E. setacea subsp. setacea and subsp. sca-
bra. This trend, associated with a more mesophytic type
of anatomy and elongated epidermal cells with costal and
intercostal zones and with abaxial stomata, may repre-
sent the convergent trends so evident in this group.
Alternatively this pattern may reflect the reticulate nature
of relationships which also characterizes this group. It is
therefore an academic decision whether subsp. dodii
should be recognized as a separate species or not. What-
ever basis is used to define species in this group, other
characters will not necessarily follow the same pattern.
The decision is also dependant on a similar decision
being made for subsp. disticha and subsp. uniflora in E.
setacea.
E. setacea Nees subsp. setacea
Transverse section
This taxon has the leaf outline which typifies this
group: the blades are setaceous, without midribs or keels
(Figure 7.1; 7.3) and with well developed adaxial ribs
and furrows (Figure 7.2; 7.4). Subsp. setacea is notable
in having acicular leaf blades of the permanently in-
folded type with the abaxial epidermal cells being very
large and regular in size as seen in transection (Figure
7.2; 7.4).
The chlorenchyma is exceptionally compact and con-
sists of straight-walled, isodiametric cells (Figure 7.2;
7.4). The chloroplasts are dense, peripherally arranged
and with a central vacuole. No invaginations are visible.
This chlorenchyma is identical in appearance to the type
so common in the Danthonieae in genera such as Merx-
muellera, particularly M. disticha (Schrad.) Nees (Ellis
1980), Pseudopentameris (Ellis 1985a) and some species
of Pentameris (Ellis 1985b, c).
Abaxial epidermis
Costal and intercostal zones are not differentiated
(Figure 7.5; 7.7), the long cells are short and fusiform
(Figure 7.6; 7.8) and separated by a single, raised silica
body (Figure 12.1). Abaxial stomata are absent as are
hooks and prickles. Microhairs are infrequent (Figure
7.8) or absent (Figure 7.6) but when present are short
with rounded distal cells (Figure 12.2).
Specimens examined
CAPE. — 3418 (Simonstown): Hottentots Holland Mts, Sugarloaf
Peak (-BB), Ellis 2273', Sir Lowry’s Pass (-BB), Ellis 2294; Landrost-
kop, Somerset Sneeuwkop (-BB), Ellis 4679.
Discussion
The leaf anatomy conforms closely to that typical of
the Setacea group, and subsp. setacea resembles E. ru-
pestris subsp. rupestris and subsp. tricostata very clo-
sely in leaf anatomy. It differs mainly in the absence of
abaxial prickles. Other slight differences, such as the
chlorenchyma cell invaginations and the epidermal cells
in tranverse section which are regular in size, due to the
absence of prickle hair bases, are only differences of
degree. Anatomically, therefore, subsp. setacea clearly
belongs to the Setacea group. Whether it should be sepa-
rated from E. rupestris is debatable according to the
anatomical evidence and E. setacea subsp. setacea has
more in common with E. rupestris subsp. tricostata than
it has with any of the other subspecies of E. setacea. The
leaf anatomy appears to indicate that these two taxa are
conspecific and the relative glume length, which is used
to separate E. setacea from E. rupestris (Gibbs Russell
1984), results in an apparently artificial anatomical
grouping. This observation is particularly relevant when
the anatomy of subsp. setacea is compared with that of
subsp. scabra, as these taxa exhibit significant anatomi-
cal differences which would justify at least specific sepa-
ration in other grass groups.
Once again the classification of taxa within the Seta-
cea group presents problems with contradictory anatomi-
cal and morphological evidence. A possible explanation
for this situation lies in different rates of evolution in
different organs combined with a reticulate evolutionary
pattern. Present knowledge indicates that, whatever
characters are used to distinguish taxa in this group,
heterogeneity of other character sets will result. This
makes a generally acceptable classification almost im-
possible to achieve.
The anatomical resemblance between subsp. setacea
(and E. rupestris subsp. tricostata as well) and many of
the winter rainfall danthonoid grasses deserves further
mention. Both in section and epidermis subsp. setacea
closely resembles species of Pseudopentameris (Ellis
1985a), and Pentameris (Ellis 1985b, c) in particular.
These similarities may only be coincidental but it is more
probable that they result from convergent evolution.
Convergent and parallel patterns appear to be common in
Cape fynbos grass species. Most species of the mountain
regions, where nutrients are severely limiting, have
evolved a structurally complex, long-lived leaf, in con-
trast to the lowland species in which the leaves are decid-
uous (or the plants annual) with a much simpler internal
structure, with thinner cell walls, less sclerenchyma and
larger air spaces. This general pattern cuts across phylo-
genetic lines at the generic level and does not appear to
be taxonomically significant. What is of importance,
however, is that here taxa from different subfamilies
have responded identically to similar environmental con-
ditions.
82
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
FIGURE 7. — Leaf anatomy of Ehrharta setacea subsp. setacea. 1-2, Ellis 4679: 1 , leaf outline showing inrolling and undifferentiated midrib,
scale = 20 /xm; 2, anatomical detail with compact chlorenchyma and adaxial stomata (s), scale = 5 /cm. 3—4, Ellis 22 73: 3, inrolled
outline, scale = 20 /xm; 4, isodiametric chlorenchyma cells without wall invaginations, scale = 5 /xm. 5-6, Ellis 2294, abaxial
epidermis: 5, costal and intercostal zone cell structure similar, scale = 10 /xm; 6, hexagonal long cells separated by cork-silica cell pairs,
scale = 5 /xm. 7, Ellis 2273, costal and intercostal zones not clearly differentiated, scale = 10 /xm. 8, Ellis 4679, note small, indistinct
microhairs (m), scale = 10 /xm.
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
83
E. setacea Nees subsp. scabra (Stapf) Gibbs Russell
Transverse section
This subspecies has a wide, expanded type of lamina
(Figure 8.1; 8.3) which is not of the setaceous type of
subsp. setacea. In all specimens, even those in which the
blade is almost flat, there are indications of convolute
infolding (Figures 8.1; 8.3). This is reminiscent of the
condition in E. rupestris subsp. dodii. Slight adaxial ribs
and wide, open furrows (Figures 8.2; 8.4; 8.6) resemble
the subsp. dodii condition more than subsp. setacea.
The single most significant anatomical feature of
subsp. scabra is the possession of definite arm cells in
the mesophyll (Figures 8.2; 8.4; 8.5; 8.6). These are
typical arm cells with distinct invaginations of the cell
walls visible in all chlorenchyma cells (Figures 8.2; 8.4)
and the chloroplast pattern is also indented, indicating
the presence of these inward projections of the cell walls
(Figures 8.5; 8.6). Typical arm cells are, however,
sometimes lacking in subsp. scabra ( Ellis 4653). Arm
cells do not occur in subsp. setacea but indications of
their existence are evident in all other taxa of the Setacea
group.
Abaxial epidermis
The structure of the epidermis is very similar to that of
E. rupestris. Absence of zonation, short fusiform long
cells, no stomata, rounded silica bodies and hook-like
prickles (Figure 9. 1-9.4) occur in subsp. scabra and
characterize the taxa of the Setacea group. Ultrastructu-
rally this similarity is confirmed by the raised papilla-
like silica bodies (Figure 12.3) and short microhairs with
rounded distal cells (Figure 12.4). This epidermal struc-
ture differs somewhat from that of subsp. setacea and
subsp. uniflora but is virtually identical to that of E.
rupestris subsp. rupestris and subsp. tricostata.
Specimens examined
CAPE. — 3320 (Montagu): Barrydale Distr. , Tradouw’s Pass (-DC),
Ellis 1678, 1679, 4652, 4653 (varies anatomically). 3321 (Ladismith):
Riversdale Distr., Langeberge, Garcia’s Pass (-CC), Ellis 2544, 4689.
Discussion
Arm cells are considered to be a very important cha-
racter in the systematics of the Poaceae and the presence
of these cells in subsp. scabra may be taxonomically
meaningful. Arm cells are a diagnostic characteristic of
FIGURE 8. — Cross-sectional leaf anatomy of Ehrharta setacea subsp. scabra. 1-2, Ellis 4689 : 1 , broad, expanded outline, scale = 20 /xm; 2,
anatomical detail clearly showing arm cells (a), scale = 5 /xm. 3-4, Ellis 2544: 3, inrolled but broad leaf with median vascular bundle
(mr) only, scale = 20 /xm; 4, arm cells (a) with distinct cell wall invaginations, scale = 5 /xm. 5, Ellis 1679, leaf margin showing arm
cells and abaxial prickles (p), scale = 10 /xm. 6, Ellis 1678, arm cells (a) of chlorenchyma densely filled with chloroplasts, scale = 10
84
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
FIGURE 9. — Abaxial epidermal structure of Ehrharta setacea subsp. scabra. 1-2, Ellis 4689 : 1 , cell arrangement, scale = 10 /im; 2, costal
and intercostal zones only slightly differentiated, scale = 10 /zm. 3-4, Ellis 4652: 3, cell pattern consistent throughout abaxial epidermis,
scale = 10 gm; 4, microhairs (m) and shortly barbed prickles (p), scale = 5 gm.
the Bambusoideae (including Oryzeae) and, as such, are
a feature of high taxonomic value. However, arm cells
are known sporadically from non-bambusoid groups.
Examples are Phragmites and Thysanolaena of the
Arundinoideae and Sclerodactylon and the Triodeae of
the Chloridoideae (Watson et al. 1985). This occurrence
of arm cells in these apparently unrelated groups is im-
possible to explain but indicates that the presence of arm
cells in the Setacea group of Ehrharta does not necessar-
ily imply bambusoid relationships for the genus. How-
ever, their presence can undoubtedly be used to substan-
tiate the arguments of those workers (Renvoize 1986) in
favour of bambusoid affinities for Ehrharta. However,
the occurrence of fully developed arm cells in only one
taxon of the genus Ehrharta urges caution in attaching
too much importance to their presence.
A certain degree of anatomical variation was observed
in this subspecies. This variation applies particularly to
the presence of stomatal bands in the abaxial epidermis
(Figure 10.3) with an associated development of clear
structural differentiation between the costal and intercos-
tal zones. The specimen displaying this type of structure
(Ellis 4653) was collected growing together with Ellis
4652, which has the anatomy typical of subsp. scabra,
whereas Ellis 4653 is a much more robust plant with an
FIGURE 10. — Anatomical variation in Ehrharta setacea subsp. scabra, Ellis 4653. 1-2, leaf sections: 1 , margin of open, expanded leaf, scale
= 20 n- m; 2, mesophyll not compact and not comprised of distinct arm cells, note abaxial stomata (s), scale = 10 /xm. 3, abaxial
epidermis showing stomatal bands (s), microhairs (m) and clear cellular differentiation between costal and intercostal zones, scale = 5
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
85
extremely dense underground rhizome system. The ana-
tomy of this specimen is illustrated in Figure 10 and it
can be seen to differ from typical subsp. scabra in the
presence of abaxial stomata, the epidermal zonation and
by having elongated intercostal long cells (Figure 10.3)
and by the absence of typical arm cells, with the invagi-
nations being poorly developed (Figure 10.2). The mi-
crohairs are also more elongated (Figure 12.6) and there
are fewer prickles (Figure 12.5). The anatomy of this
specimen is, therefore, intermediate between that of
subsp. scabra and subsp. uniflora which has abaxial
stomata, no prickles and elongated, tapering microhairs
(Figure 12.7; 12.8). A few isolated stomata were also
observed on the epidermis of Ellis 4689, a rather robust
specimen with wide leaves (Figure 8.1). However, in
this specimen, the epidermal zones are not structurally
differentiated (Figure 9.1; 9.2) and the arm cells are
clearly developed (Figure 8.2). It is possible that a whole
range of intermediates will be found between E. setacea
subsp. scabra and subsp. uniflora and disticha. Unfortu-
nately the latter two subspecies are poorly represented in
this study and it was not possible to determine the exact
pattern of variation between these taxa.
E. setacea Nees subsp. uniflora (Burch, ex Stapf)
Gibbs Russell
Transverse section
This subspecies has a narrow but flat and expanded
leaf outline (Figure 11.1) with poorly developed ribs and
furrows (Figure 11.3). This is not the setaceous type of
leaf outline as in subsp. setacea, and abaxial stomata are
clearly visible even in transection (Figure 11.3; 11.4).
There is also no indication of convolute inrolling as in
subsp. scabra.
The mesophyll of subsp. uniflora is also not as com-
pact as in all the other taxa of the Setacea group (Figure
11.2; 1 1 .4), a difference which appears to be associated
with the development of an air-space system linked to
the abaxial stomata. The mesophyll cells themselves
cannot be considered to be classical arm cells (Figure
11.2; 11 .4) although very slight invaginations are visible
in some of the chlorenchyma cell walls.
Abaxial epidermis
The presence of a single File of stomata on either side
of each costal zone (Figure 11.5; 11.6) distinguishes the
FIGURE 11. — Leaf anatomy of Ehrharta setacea subsp. uniflora. 1-2, Ellis 4670, transections: 1, open, expanded outline with median
vascular bundle (mr) only, scale = 20 /xm; 2, anatomical detail showing chlorenchyma which is not composed of typical arm cells, scale
= 5 /xm. 3-4, Ellis 4669, transections: 3, abaxial stomata (s) common, scale = 10 /xm; 4, interference contrast showing only slight wall
indentations and abaxial stomatal aperture (s), scale = 5 /xm. 5, abaxial epidermis, Ellis 4670, with single File of stomata (s) on either
side of each costal zone, scale = 10 /xm. 6, abaxial epidermis, Ellis 4669, showing stomata (s) and clearly differentiated costal zones,
scale = 10 /xm.
86
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
epidermis of this subspecies from all the other taxa of the
Setacea group (except subsp. disticha). There is also a
definite tendency for the costal zones to be structurally
different from the intercostal zones (Figure 11.6) with
the silica bodies being different. The intercostal long
cells are not separated by raised silica bodies as in the
other subspecies of E. setacea (Figure 12.1; 12.3; 12.5;
12.7). In this respect subsp. uniflora differs from all
other members of the Setacea group. Other differences
are the tapering microhairs (Figure 12.8) and the pre-
sence of epicuticular wax (Figure 12.7).
Specimens examined
CAPE. — 3418 (Simonstown): Cape Peninsula, Chapman’s Peak
(-AB), Esterhuysen 34039. 3419 (Caledon): Olifantsberg, Hermanus
(-AD), Ellis 4669, 4670, Esterhuysen 3 1039.
Discussion
The leaf anatomy of subsp. uniflora appears to be
intermediate between that of the Setacea group and some
of the other groups of the genus Ehrharta. This conten-
tion is supported by the epidermal zonation with abaxial
stomata, the presence of epicuticular wax, the absence of
raised silica bodies, the tapering microhairs and the less
compact mesophyll tissue. These features are all charac-
teristic of the Setacea group and subsp. uniflora differs
from the other taxa in this group in all these attributes
which tend toward the condition found in several of the
other infrageneric groupings in Ehrharta.
The leaf anatomy of subsp. uniflora is very similar
indeed to that of Ellis 4653, an atypical subsp. scabra
specimen (Figure 10). Ellis 4653 is a much more robust
plant with wider leaf blades than any subsp. uniflora
specimen. This is not reflected in the leaf anatomy, how-
ever, and leaf thickness and epidermal cell size are com-
parable. Only the width of the lamina is different. It
appears that the loss of the setaceous, acicular type of
leaf results in a very similar anatomy, irrespective of
which subspecies this occurs in. The development of
abaxial stomata appears to be the most significant change
and it is associated with several other anatomical features
such as the zonation of the epidermis and the presence of
an extensive air-space system accompanied by less com-
pact mesophyll. The loss of the Setacea type of silica
body and the possession of tapering microhairs is not
explained by the development of abaxial stomata, how-
ever, and they appear to be additional differences not
linked to the presence of these stomata.
Subsp. uniflora grows at very low altitudes, from
10-500m (Gibbs Russell 1984) and this is a possible
reason for the development of these abaxial stomata.
Temperatures are less extreme at these lower altitudes
with an equable maritime climate and the nutritional sta-
tus of the soil is considerably better than the leached soils
at higher altitudes. More material of subsp. uniflora is
required to gain a better understanding of the inter-
relationships of these taxa.
E. setacea Nees subsp. disticha Gibbs Russell
Transverse section
No fresh material of this taxon was available for ana-
tomical study and, consequently, the transectional ana-
tomy was not examined.
Abaxial epidermis
The epidermal structure is very similar to that de-
scribed for subsp. uniflora, with stomata! files and
clearly differentiated costal and intercostal zones (Fig-
ures 13.1; 13.2). Intercostal hooks are absent and the
intercostal silica bodies appear to be of the raised type
typical of the Setacea group but they are associated with
cork cells (Figure 13.2). Microhairs are common and
appear to be longer than the type usually found in this
group (Figure 13.2).
Specimens examined
CAPE. — 3419 (Caledon): Caledon Distr. , Vogelgat (-AD), Wil-
liams 3086.
Discussion
The epidermal anatomy of subsp. disticha is virtually
identical to that of subsp. uniflora and it is predicted that
the leaf anatomy of these two taxa will also be very
similar. This supports their classification as subspecies
of the same species (Gibbs Russell 1984). Freshly fixed
material for anatomical study is required to confirm the
prediction.
DISCUSSION
The leaf anatomy of several species of Ehrharta has
been studied by various authors (Metcalfe 1960; Jacques
Felix 1962; Renvoize 1985) but none of these studies,
except those of Tateoka (1963) dealt with any represen-
tatives of the Setacea group. Tateoka (1963) included
four species of this group but did not notice any arm
cells. Consequently, the unique anatomy of this most
interesting group has received very little attention. If the
presence of these arm cells had been reported earlier, it is
certain that it would have had a profound influence on
the classification of the genus in the Poaceae. On the
evidence of spikelet morphology and embryo anatomy
(Reeder 1957, 1962) Ehrharta has been placed in the
Oryzeae (Stebbins & Crampton 1961). However, the
leaf blade anatomy of the representatives studied to date
showed no affinity with the Bambusoideae (Tateoka
1963). The genus has therefore been retained in the
Arundinoideae, with which it conforms in leaf anatomy
(Renvoize 1981). Awareness of the arm cells in the Seta-
cea group would undoubtedly have strengthened the ar-
gument for retention of the genus in the Bambusoideae.
For these reasons it is regrettable that the detailed and
comprehensive study of the genus by Engelbrecht (1956)
was never published. In this thesis, 26 species of Ehr-
harta were studied in detail and their structure inter-
preted with considerable insight. Unfortunately, this
work has remained virtually unknown and has not been
considered in the taxonomy of the genus to date.
Engelbrecht (1956) observed wall invaginations in all
members of the Setacea group except E. setacea subsp.
scabra and subsp. disticha which were not examined by
him. In addition, he reported the presence of arm cell-
like invaginations in E. rehmannii, E. ramosa, E.
subspicata, E. gigantea and E. villosa. These latter ob-
servations are not substantiated by the present study
(Gibbs Russell 1987) and will be discussed fully in a
later paper. Engelbrecht (1956) used the possession of
these arm cells to divide the genus into two distinct
groups of species. The group with arm cells was further
subdivided into those without dumbbell-shaped silica
bodies (the Setacea group) and those with dumbbell-
shaped silica bodies (the Villosa and Ramosa groups).
His circumscription of the Setacea group is, therefore,
identical to the conclusions of the present study and it is
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
87
FIGURE 12. Scanning electron micrographs of the abaxial epidermis of Ehrharta selacea. 1-2, E. setacea subsp. setacea, Ellis 4679: 1 , all
intercostal long cells interspaced by single, raised and rounded silica body, X 200; 2, microhair with distal cell collapsed, x 1000. 3-6,
E. setacea subsp. scabra. 3-4, Ellis 4652: 3, prickles and asperites separating individual long cells, x 60; 4, microhair with short,
inflated distal cell, x 1000. 5-6, Ellis 4653: 5, epidermis with few prickles, long cells separated by silica bodies and stomatal files
present, x 200; 6, microhair with slightly elongated distal cell, x 1000. 7-8, E. setacea subsp. uniflora, Ellis 4670: 7, clear zonation
with stomatal files and mid-intercostal long cells slightly inflated, x 100; 8, microhair with tapering distal cell, x 1000.
88
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
FIGURE 13. — Abaxial epidermis of Ehrharta setacea subsp. disticha, Williams 3086. 1, clearly differentiated costal and intercostal zones,
scale = 10 jizm; 2, intercostal zones with microhairs (m) and stomata, scale = 10 fim.
truly unfortunate that these valuable observations have
had to wait over 30 years before being confirmed and
published.
Tateoka (1963), on the other hand, also examined the
leaf anatomy of several representatives of the Setacea
group (E. dodii, E. rupestris, E. setacea and E. trico-
stata ) but reported that ‘the mesophyll cells do not seem
to have an arm (a projection of cell membranes), as far as
the present author can observe’. The fact that no Ehr-
harta species were seen to possess arm cells or complex
midrib vasculature was used by Tateoka (1963) to con-
vincingly argue the case for the phylogenetic separation
of the Ehrharteae and Oryzeae into different tribes and
subfamilies. If he had been aware of the arm cells in the
Setacea group, this reasoning would not have been
nearly so sound and would probably never have been
propounded.
The present paper proves beyond doubt, with substan-
tiating photographic evidence, that arm cells, compara-
ble to those in most Oryzeae, occur in some of the taxa
of the Setacea group, E. setacea subsp. scabra in parti-
cular. These invaginations, together with chlorenchyma
cell size, appear to become progressively reduced in
most of the other taxa and are difficult to observe, even
in freshly fixed, fully hydrated material. In reconstituted
dried material the invaginations are apparently easier to
see (Engelbrecht 1956) but may be overlooked as being
artefacts due to dehydration and subsequent wall shrink-
age.
The Setacea group of species is obviously a closely
related unit with very uniform leaf anatomy. The degree
of modification of the arm cells which appears to have
occurred in the different taxa of the group is, conse-
quently, most unexpected. Two entirely different types
of modification appear to have taken place which deviate
from the E. setacea subsp. scabra condition. E. setacea
subsp. uniflora from lower altitudes with more equable
climates and possibly higher levels of soil nutrients
seems to have developed a diffuse mesophyll with an
extensive air space system associated with the possession
of abaxial stomata. No invaginations are evident in the
chlorenchyma cell walls of taxa with this type of meso-
phyll and all intermediate stages can be distinguished.
Taxa from the opposite type of habitat, from high alti-
tudes with extremes of temperature and a low level of
soil nutrients, on the other hand, have a very different
type of leaf anatomy which appears to be derived from
the basic subsp. scabra anatomy. This type of anatomy
is probably linked to the perennial nature of these leaves
and is characterized by the mesophyll cells becoming
increasingly reduced in size until they are small, straight-
walled and isodiametric with a corresponding almost to-
tal reduction in the air space system. This anatomical
type is always associated with a setaceous type of leaf
and with the absence of stomata. A clear reduction series
is evident in E. rupestris and these two very different
mesophyll structures can possibly be interpreted as dif-
ferent derivations of the E. setacea subsp. scabra type of
anatomy. It may be relevant to this argument that E.
setacea subsp. scabra itself is limited to the east of the
range of most of the taxa of the Setacea group where
summer rainfall becomes a significant factor. It can be
postulated that the loss of the arm cell invaginations may
be an adaptation to winter rainfall.
These two different anatomical types in the Setacea
group mirror the situation prevailing in many of the Dan-
thonieae of the Cape Fynbos region. Taxa from high
altitudes, such as Merxmuellera, P seudopentameris and
Pentameris (Ellis 1980, 1985a, b,c), resemble the latter
type, whereas species from the lowland Fynbos areas,
such as some species of Plagiochloa and Lasiochloa ,
have a more diffuse type of mesophyll. It appears, there-
fore, that habitat has been more significant than phyloge-
netic relationships in the evolution of these anatomical
features of the leaf blades in many Cape Fynbos grass
taxa.
The fact that the typical arm cell type in the mesophyll
of E. setacea subsp. scabra appears to be modified so
easily suggests that caution must be exercised in attach-
ing too much taxonomic significance to the presence of
this single character. Watson et al. (1985) discuss the
occurrence of arm cells in the family. They rightly con-
sider them to be a feature of high taxonomic value but
point out that they can occur sporadically in distant,
unrelated groups. No satisfactory explanation can be
given for this type of distribution. The presence of arm
cells in the Setacea group of Ehrharta does not neces-
sarily imply bambusoid affinities, particularly as they are
not accompanied by fusoids and complex midrib vascu-
lature. Rather, arundinoid links are suggested by the type
of mesophyll seen in E. setacea subsp. setacea (Tateoka
1963) and perhaps the arundinoid type of leaf anatomy
could have been derived in a similar manner to that de-
scribed in the Setacea group of Ehrharta from a prim-
itive bambusoid-like ancestor possessing arm cells. The
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
89
Setacea group, therefore, can be viewed as a primitive
arundinoid type exhibiting some links to the peripheral
groups of the bambusoids.
CONCLUSIONS
In both leaf anatomy and spikelet morphology the Se-
tacea group differs more from all the other groups of
Ehrharta than any of these differ from each other. Apart
from arm cells, many other anatomical characters sepa-
rate the Setacea group from the other groups (Gibbs Rus-
sell & Ellis 1987). Examples are microhair and silica
body shape. Furthermore no anatomical intermediates
were found linking this group to any of the other equiva-
lent groups of Ehrharta. These other groups, on the
other hand, are sometimes linked by intermediate speci-
mens or taxa. This suggests that the Setacea group may
deserve separate subgeneric or generic status but consid-
eration of the generic and infrageneric classification of
Ehrharta will be dealt with in the last of this series of
papers.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author is grateful to Mrs H. Ebertsohn for techni-
cal assistance, to Mrs S. Perold for the SEM work, to
Mrs A. Romanowski for the photography and Mrs S.S.
Brink for typing the manuscript. Voucher specimens
were identified by the staff of the National Herbarium
(PRE) and revised by Dr G.E. Gibbs Russell.
REFERENCES
CHIPPINDALL, L. K. A. 1955. In D. Meredith, The grasses and
pastures of South Africa. CNA, Johannesburg.
ELLIS, R. P. 1980. Leaf anatomy of the South African Danthonieae
(Poaceae). U. Merxmuellera disticha. Bothalia 13: 185-189.
ELLIS, R. P. 1985a. Leaf anatomy of the South African Danthonieae
(Poaceae). X. Pseudopentameris. Bothalia 15: 561-566.
ELLIS, R. P. 1985b. Leaf anatomy of the South African Danthonieae
(Poaceae). XI. Pentameris longiglumis and Pentameris sp. nov.
Bothalia 15: 567-571.
ELLIS, R. P. 1985c. Leaf anatomy of the South African Danthonieae
(Poaceae). XIII. Pentameris macrocalycina and P. obtusifolia.
Bothalia 15: 579-585.
ENGELBRECHT, A. H. P. 1956. ' n Morfologiese studie van die
genus Ehrharta Thunb. M.Sc. thesis, University of Pretoria.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G. E. 1984. Notes on species of Ehrharta with a
short first sterile lemma. Bothalia 15: 149-151.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G. E. 1987. Taxonomy of the genus Ehrharta
(Poaceae) in southern Africa: the Setacea group. Bothalia 17:
67-73.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G. E. & ELLIS, R. P. 1987. Species groups in the
genus Ehrharta (Poaceae) in southern Africa. Bothalia 17: 51-65.
JACQUES-FELIX, H. 1962. Les graminees d'Afrique Tropicale. 1.
Generalites, classification, description des genres. Institut de Re-
cherches Agronomiques Tropicales et des Cultures Vivrieres,
Paris.
METCALFE, C. R. 1960 . Anatomy of the Monocotyledons . I. Grami-
neae. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
REEDER, J. R. 1957. The embryo in grass systematics. American
Journal of Botany 44: 756-768.
REEDER, J. R. 1962. The Bambusoid embryo: a reappraisal. Ameri-
can Journal of Botany 49: 639-64 1 .
RENVOIZE, S. A. 1981. The subfamily Arundinoideae and its posi-
tion in relation to a general classification of the Gramineae. Kew
Bulletin 36: 85-102.
RENVOIZE, S. A. 1985. A survey of leaf-blade anatomy in grasses.
V. The bamboo allies. Kew Bulletin 40: 509-535.
RENVOIZE, S. A. 1986. A survey of leaf-blade anatomy in grasses.
Vm. Arundinoideae. Kew Bulletin, in press.
STEBBINS, G. L. & CRAMPTON, B. 1961 . A suggested revision of
the grass genera of North America. Recent Advances in Botany 1:
133-145. University of Toronto Press.
TATEOKA, T. 1963. Notes on some grasses. XIII. Relationship be-
tween Oryzeae and Ehrharteae, with special reference to leaf ana-
tomy and histology. The Botanical Gazette 124: 264—270.
WATSON, L., CLIFFORD, H. T. & DALLWITZ, M. J. 1985. The
classification of the Poaceae: subfamilies and supertribes. Austra-
lian Journal of Botany 33: 433-484.
Bothalia 17,1:91-95(1987)
Six cultivars of Solanum macrocarpon (Solanaceae) in Ghana
Z. R. BUKENYA* and J. B. HALL**
Keywords: crop evolution, egg plant, Ghana, new cultivars, Solanum dasyphyllum, Solanum macrocarpon complex
ABSTRACT
The Solanum macrocarpon complex (the cultivated egg plant) has been studied in Ghana using morphological and
experimental methods. Six cultivars belonging to the S. macrocarpon complex have been recognized and described. The
cultivars are S. macrocarpon ‘Gboma’, S. macrocarpon ‘Mankessim’, S. macrocarpon ‘Akwaseho’, S. macrocarpon
‘Kade’, S. macrocarpon ‘Sarpeiman’ and S. macrocarpon ‘Bui’. The very spiny, hairy plant traditionally called
S. dasyphyllum is regarded as the wild ancestor from which the cultivars have been derived through a process of crop
evolution. The variation within S. macrocarpon complex is attributable to genotypic differences and environmental factors.
UITTREKSEL
Die Solanum macrocarpon- kompleks (die gekweekte eierplant) is in Ghana bestudeer deur gebruik te maak van
morfologiese en eksperimentele metodes. Ses kultivars wat aan die S. macrocarpon- kompleks behoort, is erken en beskryf.
Die kultivars is S. macrocarpon ‘Gboma’, S. macrocarpon ‘Mankessim’, S. macrocarpon ‘Akwaseho’, S. macrocarpon
‘Kade’, 5. macrocarpon ‘Sarpeiman’ en S. macrocarpon ‘Bui’. Die baie doringrige, harige plant wat tradisioneel
S. dasyphyllum genoem word, word as die wilde voorouer waaruit die kultivars deur ’n proses van gewas-evolusie ontstaan
het, beskou. Die variasie binne die S. macrocarpon- kompleks kan toegeskryf word aan genotipiese verskille en
omgewingsfaktore.
INTRODUCTION
Solanum macrocarpon L. is an important native Afri-
can vegetable, especially in west Africa where both the
leaves and fruits are eaten. In east Africa, particularly
Uganda, it is however a minor crop and it is mainly the
leaves that are eaten (Bukenya 1984). The crop is also
cultivated in South America and Asia. It was introduced
to Europe from India, described and illustrated by Miller
(1759) and named by Linnaeus (1771).
Despite its importance as a vegetable and its wide-
spread occurrence, little has been done until now to re-
cognize and describe any of the cultivars.
METHODS AND MATERIALS OF MORPHOLOGICAL STUDY
Materials belonging to the S. macrocarpon complex
were collected from different localities throughout
southern Ghana, and also (mainly seeds) obtained from
elsewhere in Africa (Togo, Nigeria and Uganda). In sou-
thern Ghana, farms where S. macrocarpon is grown,
were visited. Herbarium specimens were made. Ripe
fruits, from which seeds were later extracted, were col-
lected from farms and in some cases from markets.
Occasionally, when mature fruits were not available,
transplants were collected and later replanted in an ex-
perimental garden. Photographs of flowering and fruit-
ing plants were taken.
Each individual (transplant) or each fruit was given a
different accession number. In the laboratory, seeds
from different accessions were extracted and spread on
paper to dry at room temperature. After drying a mini-
* Botany Department, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kam-
pala, Uganda.
** Formerly: Botany Department, Makerere University, P.O. Box
7062, Kampala, Uganda. (Deceased).
mum of 20 seeds from each accession (fruit), they were
sown in compost soil in seed pots. Pots were housed in a
greenhouse at a mean daily maximum temperature of
34,8 °C and mean daily minimum temperature of
22,1 °C. Pots were watered every two to three days.
When seedlings were at the three-leaved stage (about
two weeks after germination), they were picked out of
the seed pots and transferred to seed boxes kept outside
in sunshine. When the plants were about a month old
they were removed from the seed boxes and planted in
the experimental garden.
About ten plants of each accession were planted. The
plots were constantly weeded and plants watered when
necessary. The major pests of the plants (caterpillars)
were controlled by spraying with DDT (Five grammes of
powder in about four litres of water).
The morphological characteristics of the plants were
observed in their developmental process. When plants
had fully grown, measurements of the characters of
stem, leaves, flowers and fruits were taken.
The following accessions were studied:
5. macrocarpon ‘Gboma’
Hall & Bukenya S32 & S35 (Ghana, Pamproase, nr Achimota); Hall &
Bukenya S34 (Ghana, Sarpeiman, nr Achimota); Hall & Bukenya S39
(Ghana, Avenor, nr Accra); Hall S54 (Togo, Lome); Hall S55 (Togo,
Kleve); Hall S56 (Nigeria, Lagos Campus); Hall & Bukenya S58,
(Ghana, Accra market); Hall 47172 (Ghana, Medina, nr Accra).
S. macrocarpon ‘Mankessim’
Hall & Bukenya 47124 (Ghana, Mankessim); Hall 47170 & 47171
(Ghana, Nkwanta village).
S. macrocarpon ‘Akwaseho’
Hall & Bukenya S21 (Ghana, Akwaseho, Kwahu).
92
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
S. macrocarpon ‘Kade’
Hall 47169 (Ghana, Kade).
S. macrocarpon ‘Sarpeiman’
Hall & Bukenya S45 & S47 (Ghana, Sarpeiman).
S. macrocarpon ‘Bui’
Hall & Swaine 46212 (Ghana, Bui N. P.); Sobey 45080 (Ghana, Mole
Game Reserve).
S. dasyphyllum var. dasyphyllum (the putative wild an-
cestor)
Anoff s.n. (Ghana, Nsawam); Morton 7484 (Ghana, nr Gambaga);
Katende UG. 2 (Uganda, Kampala).
The above specimens were deposited in University of
Ghana Herbarium.
RESULTS
A summary of morphological measurements is given
in Tables 1-4.
TABLE 1.— Summary of means of leaf characters. Each figu/e represents a mean of no less than 20 measurements
TABLE 3. — Summary of means of inflorescence characters. Each figure represents a mean of no less than 20 measurements
TABLE 4. — Summary of means of characters of hermaphrodite flowers (mm). Each figure represents a mean of no less than 20
measurements
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
93
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
The results of morphological study show that there is
tremendous variation within the S. macrocarpon com-
plex. Some of the accessions within the complex have
big, deeply lobed leaves while others have small and less
lobed leaves. Also flowers vary in their size and depth of
corolla lobing. Whereas the flower calyx length of many
accessions was 10-22 mm, one accession had a calyx
length of about 60 mm; whereas the ratio between lamina
length and petiole length of many accessions was 8-10, a
ratio of 25-46 was obtained in one accession.
Apart from the above morphological variation, con-
sidered to be due mainly to genotypic differences, en-
vironmental factors were also seen to play a significant
part in the phenotypic variation in the S. macrocarpon
complex. One such factor was noted to be cultivation
methods. For example, at Avenor near Accra in Ghana,
5. macrocarpon was seen to be grown in crowded rows
and the leaves were removed constantly for sale when
the plants were still young. Figure 1 shows a typical
planting of S. macrocarpon on a farm at Avenor. The
plants here had a height of less than 0,3 m, and they had
small fruits (30-35 mm diam.) and small leaves (170 x
90 mm). When seeds collected from a farm at Avenor
were grown in our experimental farm with proper spac-
ing of plants and no trimming, the plants attained a
height of about 0,7 m with a fruit diameter of 40-60 mm
and a mean leaf size of 255 x 164 mm.
FIGURE 1 . — A typical planting of Solarium macrocarpon on a farm at
Avenor near Accra, July 1979.
It was Bitter (1923) who first realized the tremendous
variation within the S. macrocarpon complex and he
described several infraspecific taxa. He also noted that
the traditional separation of S. macrocarpon from S.
dasyphyllum on the basis of the latter being spiny and
hairy and the former unarmed and glabrous, was not
satisfactory. He was for example able to describe, ‘a
spineless variety of 5. dasyphyllum and a spiny subspe-
cies of 5. macrocarpon’ .
We noted that there was a continuous range of varia-
tion in hairiness and spininess from very hairy and spiny
accessions to glabrous and unarmed accessions. It also
appears that spininess is a heterozygous character. This
was demonstrated by the fact that when seeds from a
single fruit (Katende LJG.l — S. macrocarpon) were
sown, about 60 % of the plants that grew were spiny and
40 % not spiny. Some plants of accession Hall 47172 (S.
macrocarpon) from Medina near Accra, were seen to
bear spines, though S. macrocarpon, according to most
authors, is non-spiny.
The type specimen of S. macrocarpon is Thonning
117 from Guinea [Ghana]. We have studied the IDC
microfiche photographs of two duplicates on IDC micro-
fiche No. 2203-101: HI. 3-6. The specimen illustrated
in EH. 3 is glabrous, leaves oblong and subentire and that
in III. 5 is glabrous, leaves oblong. Some of the leaves
on this specimen are subentire while others are more or
less deeply double-lobed with major lobes bearing minor
lobes. The type specimens for S. dasyphyllum, Thonning
144, came from ‘Guinea’ (i.e. near Accra, Ghana (Hep-
per 1976). The IDC microfiche photographs (No.
2203-102: I. 1-4) show that the plants have oblong,
deeply double-lobed leaves. They are very hairy and the
stem, midribs and primary lateral nerves bear robust
spines.
Bitter (1923) and recent other workers like Heine
(1963) realized that the two species are very close.
Bukenya (1980 in unpublished M.Sc. thesis) con-
cluded that the species traditionally called S. macrocar-
pon and 5. dasyphyllum were one and proposed to sink
the latter under S. macrocarpon.
In this paper we have treated the S. macrocarpon com-
plex as a combination of the former two species, i.e.
S. macrocarpon L. and 5. dasyphyllum Schum. &
Thonn.
Our study has enabled us to identify seven groups
belonging to the 5. macrocarpon complex. Since this
complex is basically a cultivated crop, it is not satisfac-
tory to give formal taxonomic ranks to these groups. We
have therefore decided to give cultivar names to all these
groups, except one which is wild. The wild one matches
Bitter’s S. dasyphyllum var. dasyphyllum in its dense
spines and hairs and double lobing of the leaves. We
believe that this wild plant is the ancestor of the cultivars
and that the cultivars have arisen after a long process of
cultivation and selection for non-spininess and non-hairi-
ness. The name cultivar is used in this context in the
same sense as used in the International Code of Nomen-
clature for Cultivated Plants of 1969.
The cultivar names are either the Ghanaian native
names for the plants or names of localities where the
cultivars were collected in Ghana. An attempt was made
to compare the present cultivars with the taxa that Bitter
(1923) described in Series Macrocarpon.
The following are the named cultivars with their de-
scriptions and illustrations, where possible.
1 . S. macrocarpon ‘Gboma’ (Figure 2)
Plant of low growth, not spiny. Flowers and calyx
small; calyx 15-18 x 4—6 mm. Leaves petiolate, more or
less glabrous, occasionally with a few scattered simple
hairs, very shallowly lobed, middle lobe 20-40 mm
long. Stem glabrous. Fruit medium-sized, 30-40
x 40-50 mm, green or white when young, turning
purplish later; yellow when ripe. Locality: Ghana, Ave-
nor near Accra, 5°33'N, 0°13'W, Hall & Bukenya S39.
94
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
This cultivar is comparable to Bitter’s S. macrocarpon
var. macrocarpon (var. culvum). Type: Guinea [Ghana],
Thonning 117.
FIGURE 2. — Solatium macrocarpon ‘Gboma’, growing at Legon,
Ghana (Mar. 1980), showing rotate corolla.
2. S. macrocarpon ‘Mankessim’ (Figure 3)
Plants fairly tall, spiny or unarmed. Calyx fairly large,
20-25 x 6 mm. Leaves more or less subsessile, fairly
deeply lobed, middle lobe 40-60 mm long, puberulous
with simple, sessile stellate and stalked stellate hairs.
Stem with same pubescence as leaves. Fruit fairly large,
40-50 x 50-60 mm, white when young, yellow when
ripe.
Locality : Ghana, Mankessim, 5°16'N, 1°0TW, Hall &
Bukenya 47 124 .
This cultivar is comparable to Bitter’s S. macrocarpon
var. primovestitum except that ‘Mankessim’ may bear
spines which are lacking in var. primovestitum and the
former has more and persistent hairs. The locality of
Bitter’s S. macrocarpon var. primovestitum is on the
coast of Mozambique.
FIGURE 3. — Solanum macrocarpon ‘Mankessim’, growing on a farm
at Mankessim, Ghana (July 1979).
3. S. macrocarpon ‘Akwaseho’ (Figure 4)
Plants similar to ‘Mankessim’, spiny or not spiny, but
leaves more deeply lobed, middle lobe up to 70 mm long
and fruits larger: about 50 x 90 mm. Leaves subsessile
with some simple and sessile stellate hairs. Calyx very
big, up to 60 x 30 mm. Fruits ivory-coloured when
young, turning yellow when ripe.
Locality: Ghana, Akwaseho, 6°37'N, 0°49'W, Hall &
Bukenya S21 .
This cultivar is comparable to Bitter’s S. macrocarpon
var. macrocarpon forma megistocalyx Bitter, in the form
of the big calyx. The calyx of our cultivar is even bigger
than in forma megistocalyx. The major difference is that
‘Akwaseho’ has some sessile stellate hairs and spines
may be present on leaves while forma megistocalyx lacks
hairs and spines. The locality of forma megistocalyx was
Congo (Lower Zaire) Region, Kisantu, Gillet s.n.
FIGURE 4. — Solanum macrocarpon ‘Akwaseho’, growing in an ex-
perimental plot at Legon, Ghana (Nov. 1979), showing big fruits,
big fruiting calyx and deeply lobed leaves.
4.5. macrocarpon ‘Kade’ (Figure 5)
Leaves very narrow and deeply lobed, middle lobe up
to 80 mm long; subsessile with simple, sessile stellate or
stalked stellate hairs. Calyx fairly long but narrow, up to
30 x 60 mm. Fruit ovoid or spherical, 30-70 x 40 mm,
green or green with patches when young, turning yellow
when ripe.
Locality: Ghana, Abodon, 6°26'N, 1°32'W, Hall 47169.
This cultivar does not match any of Bitter’s taxa. It is
unique in that its leaves are so narrow and deeply lobed
and it may have an oblong fruit which is unusual in 5.
macrocarpon.
FIGURE 5. — Solanum macrocarpon ‘Kade’, growing on a farm at
Abodon, Ghana (July 1979).
5. 5. macrocarpon ‘Sarpeiman’ (Figure 6)
Plants similar to ‘Gboma’ but almost always spiny and
fairly hairy with simple, branched, sessile stellate and
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
95
stalked stellate hairs on leaves and stem. Leaves petio-
late. Fruit green when young, turning yellow when ripe.
Locality. Ghana, Sarpeiman, 5°43'N, 0°18'W, Hall &
Bukenya S45.
This cultivar is comparable to Bitter’s S. dasyphyllum
var. semiglabrum (C. W. Wright) Bitter, except that in
the former the spine length on the midrib ranges from
0-13 mm whereas in the latter the range is 6-10 mm.
The type locality of semiglabrum is Nupe-Benue Pro-
vince in northern Nigeria.
FIGURE 6. — Solanum macrocarpon ‘Sar-
peiman’, growing in an experimental
plot at Legon, Ghana (Nov. 1979)
showing spines.
6. S. macrocarpon ‘Bui’
Plants spiny. Leaves subsessile and deeply lobed,
middle lobe 60-70 mm long; with sparse, simple,
branched, sessile and stalked stellate hairs. Stem with
similar pubescence as leaves but denser. Fruit green
when young, turning yellow when ripe.
Locality: Ghana, Bui, 8°16'N, 2°16'W, Hall & Swaine
46212.
This cultivar is comparable to Bitter’s S. dasyphyllum
var. dasyphyllum except that the former is less hairy than
the latter, probably because the former is occasionally
cultivated. Bitter’s locality of var. dasyphyllum is Gui-
nea [Ghana], Thonning 144.
7. Putative wild ancestor (Figure 7)
Plants very hairy and very spiny. Leaves subsessile,
often doubly lobed; middle lobe up to 60 mm long. Ca-
FIGURE 7. — Putative wild ancestor ( Solanum dasyphyllum var. dasy-
phyllum) from Uganda, growing in cultivation at Legon, Ghana
(Mar. 1980), showing mature, deeply lobed leaf with numerous
spines and hairs.
lyx about 10 x 5 mm. Leaves and stem with simple,
branched, sessile or stalked stellate hairs. Fruit green
when young, turning light yellow when ripe.
Locality: Uganda, near Kampala, Katende UG.2\
Ghana, Nsawam, Anoffs.n.
This is comparable to Bitter’s S. dasyphyllum var.
dasyphyllum from Guinea [Ghana] Thonning 144.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We wish to extend our gratitude to the Uganda
Government which sponsored a two year study of Sola-
num in Ghana. Thanks go to University of Ghana, Legon
for providing the facilities for the study.
Our thanks also go to all individuals who provided us
with specimens and any form of assistance during this
study.
REFERENCES
BITTER, G. 1923. Solana africana 4. Feddes Repertorium Beihefte 16:
1-320.
BUKENYA, Z. R. 1984. Solanum macrocarpon: an under-utilized but
potential vegetable in Uganda. Uganda Journal 41:9-15.
HEINE, H. 1963. Solanaceae. In J. Hutchinson & J. M. Dalziel, Flora
of west tropical Africa, 2nd edn, rev. R. W. J. Keay & F. N.
Hepper, 2: 325-335. Crown Agents, London.
HEPPER, F. W. 1976. The west African herbaria of Isert & Thonning:
a taxonomic revision of the index to the IDC microfiche. Ben-
tham-Moxon Trust, Kew.
LINNAEUS, C. 1771. Mantissa plantarum altera. Stockholm.
MILLER, P. 1759. Gardener's dictionary. 7th edn, 2 vols.
WRIGHT, C. H. 1906. Solanaceae. In W. T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora of
tropical Africa 4: 207-261. Reeve, London.
Bothalia 17,1:97-104(1987)
of Fusarium (Fungi: Hyphomycetes) in South Africa,
W. F. O. MARASAS*, SANDRA C. LAMPRECHT**, P. S. VAN WYKt and R. Y. ANELICH*
Bibliography
1945-1985
Keywords: bibliography, Fusarium, Fungi, Hyphomycetes, South Africa
ABSTRACT
A taxonomic study of the genus Fusarium in South Africa was published by Doidge in 1938. A record of all the fungi,
including Fusarium, known to occur in South Africa, and of the literature concerning them until the end of 1945, was
compiled by Doidge in 1950. The present bibliography attempts to provide an index to all the literature on Fusarium in
South Africa published after 1945 until the end of 1985. An alphabetical list of Fusarium species is provided and the hosts
and/or substrates from which each species has been recorded are listed alphabetically together with references to the
literature cited. A separate alphabetical list of hosts and substrates together with the Fusarium species recorded on each is
also included.
UITTREKSEL
’n Taksonomiese studie van die genus Fusarium in Suid-Afrika is in 1938 deur Doidge gepubliseer. In 1950 het
Doidge al die fungi, waaronder Fusarium, wat in Suid-Afrika bekend is en die toepaslike literatuur tot aan die einde van
1945, aangeteken. Die huidige bibliografie poog om ’n indeks te voorsien tot al die literatuur oor Fusarium in Suid-Afrika
wat na 1945 tot aan die einde van 1985 gepubliseer is. ’n Alfabetiese lys van Fusarium- spesies word voorsien en die gashere
en/of substrate waarop elke spesie aangeteken is, word in ’n alfabetiese lys aangegee tesame met verwy sings na die betrokke
literatuur. ’n Aparte alfabetiese lys van gashere en substrate tesame met die Fusarium- spesies wat op elk aangeteken is,
word ook ingesluit.
INTRODUCTION
A major taxonomic study of the genus Fusarium in
South Africa was published by Doidge (1938). In this
publication a detailed account was given of the occur-
rence of 26 species, 31 varieties, and 13 formae of Fusa-
rium on a large number of host plants, as well as insects
and other fungi. Doidge (1950) compiled a record of all
the fungi and lichens known to occur in South Africa and
of the literature concerning them, until the end of 1945.
This monumental compilation included some 29 species,
25 varieties, and 11 formae of Fusarium. These two
publications are the basis of all the existing knowledge
about the occurrence of the genus Fusarium in South
Africa. Several subsequently published lists of plant
diseases in South Africa (Doidge et al. 1953; Gorter
1961, 1973, 1977, 1981) have added some information
about the occurrence of Fusarium spp. as plant patho-
gens in South Africa, but did not include the literature
dealing with the occurrence of Fusarium spp. as sapro-
phytes or mycotoxin producers in South Africa.
The aim of the present publication is to compile an
index to all the available literature on Fusarium in South
Africa published after 1945, and thus not included in
Doidge (1950), to the end of 1985. In addition to phyto-
* National Research Institute for Nutritional Diseases, South African
Medical Research Council, P.O. Box 70, Tygerberg 7505.
** Plant Protection Research Institute, Private Bag X5017, Stellen-
bosch 7600.
t Department of Plant Pathology, University of the Orange Free
State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300.
t Plant Protection Research Institute, Private Bag X134, Pretoria
0001.
pathological aspects, the literature surveyed included
mycological, mycotoxicological, and ecological studies.
A few references to papers published prior to 1945 but
not cited by Doidge (1950) are included. It is hoped that
this bibliography, together with Doidge (1938) and
Doidge (1950), will be as complete a guide as possible to
the literature on Fusarium in South Africa to the end of
1985.
The material in this bibliography is arranged in three
parts: References; Fusarium species; Hosts and sub-
strates.
REFERENCES
Complete references to all the literature cited are given. The
geographical area referred to as ‘South Africa’ in this bibliography was
considered to include the Republic of South Africa, South W est Africa/
Namibia, and the Republics of Bophuthatswana, Ciskei, Transkei and
Venda. Unpublished reports, articles in popular journals, abstracts, and
theses are excluded from the literature surveyed.
AUCOCK, H. W., MARASAS, W. F. O., MEYER, C. J. &
CHALMERS, P. 1980. Field outbreaks of hyperoestrogenism
(vulvo-vaginitis) in pigs consuming maize infected by Fusarium
graminearum and contaminated with zearalenone. Journal of the
South African Veterinary Association 5 1 : 163-166.
BOOTH, C. 1971. The genus Fusarium. Commonwealth Mycological
Institute, Kew, England, pp. 237.
BREW'ER, P. J. 1962. Potato stem-end rot caused by Fusarium spp.
South African Journal of Agricultural Science 5: 47 5 — 48 1 .
BRYSON, R. W. 1982. Kikuyu poisoning and the army worm. Jour-
nal of the South African Veterinary Association 53: 161-165.
BURGESS, L. W., NELSON, P. E. & TOUSSOUN, T. A. 1982.
Characterization, geographic distribution and ecology of Fusa-
rium crookwellense sp. nov. Transactions of the British Myco-
logical Society 79: 497-505.
BURGESS, L. W., NELSON, P. E. , TOUSSOUN. T. A. & MARA-
SAS, W. F. O. 1985. Fusarium scirpi: emended description and
notes on geographic distribution. Mycologia 77: 212-218.
98
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
COMMONWEALTH MYCOLOGICAL INSTITUTE (CMI). 1977a.
Distribution maps of plant diseases. Fusarium oxysporum /. sp.
cubense. Map No. 31. Edn 4. Commonwealth Mycological Insti-
tute, Kew, England.
COMMONWEALTH MYCOLOGICAL INSTITUTE (CMI). 1977b.
Distribution maps of plant diseases. Gibberella fujikuroi. Map
No. 102. Edn 5. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew,
England.
COMMONWEALTH MYCOLOGICAL INSTITUTE (CMI). 1978.
Distribution maps of plant diseases. Gibberella fujikuroi var.
subglutinans. Map No. 191. Edn 3. Commonwealth Mycological
Institute, Kew, England.
COMMONWEALTH MYCOLOGICAL INSTITUTE (CMI). 1984a.
Distribution maps of plant diseases. Fusarium culmorum. Map
No. 440. Edn 2. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew,
England.
COMMONWEALTH MYCOLOGICAL INSTITUTE (CMI). 1984b.
Distribution maps of plant diseases. Fusarium oxysporum /. sp.
cucumerinum. Map No. 558. Edn 1. Commonwealth Mycological
Institute, Kew, England.
COETZER, J. A. W., KELLERMAN, T. S. & NAUDE, T. W. 1985.
Neurotoxicoses of livestock caused by plants and fungi in southern
Africa. Republic of South Africa Department of Agriculture and
Water Supply Technical Communication No. 199: 1-38.
COMBRINK, J. C., KOTZE, J. M., WEHNER, F. C. & GROBBE-
LAAR, C. J. 1985. Fungi associated with core rot of Starking
apples in South Africa. Phytophylactica 17: 81-83.
COMBRINK, N. J. J. & PRINSLOO, K. P. 1975. Houvermoe van
aartappels soos beinvloed deur bemestingstowwe. Crop Produc-
tion 4: 41-45.
COMBRINK, N. J. J., PRINSLOO, K. P. & JANDRELL, A. C.
1975. Die invloed van kalsium, fosfaat en boor op die houvermoe
en kwaliteitsbepalende knoleienskappe by aartappels. Agro-
plantae 7: 81-84.
CROOKES, C. A. & RUKENBERG, F. H. J. 1985a. Isolation of
fungi associated with blossom malformation of mangoes. South
African Mango Grower' s Association Research Report 5: 10-14.
CROOKES, C. A. & RUKENBERG, F. H. J. 1985b. A literature
review of the distribution, symptomology, cause and control of
mango blossom malformation. South African Mango Grower's
Association Research Report 5: 15-24.
DARVAS, J. M. 1978. Stem-end rot and other post-harvest diseases.
South African Avocado Grower’s Association Research Report 2:
49-50.
DARVAS, J. M. 1979. Ecology of avocado root pathogens. South
African Avocado Grower’s Association Research Report 3:
31-32.
DARVAS, J. M. & KOTZfi, J. M. 1979. Stem-end rot and other post-
harvest diseases. South African Avocado Grower’s Association
Research Report 3: 41—43.
DARVAS, J. M. & KOTZ£, J. M. 1981. Post-harvest diseases of
avocados. South African Avocado Grower's Association Year
Book 4: 63-66.
DARVAS, J. M., SCOTT, D. B. & KOTZE, J. M. 1978. Fungi
associated with damping-off in coniferous seedlings in South Afri-
can nurseries. South African Forestry Journal 104: 15-19.
DEACON, J. W. 1984a. Panama wilt in bananas. Farming in South
Africa, Bananas. Pamphlet No. H. 1/1984: 1-4. Department of
Agriculture and Water Supply, Pretoria.
DEACON, J. W. 1984b. Panama disease of bananas in South Africa.
Horticultural Science 1 : 29-3 1 .
DEACON, J. W., HERBERT, J. A. & DAMES, J. 1985. False
panama disorder of bananas. Subtropical. 15-18.
DIECKMAN, F., MANICOM, B. Q. & COETZEE, K. 1982. An
attempt to control blossom malformation of mangoes with che-
mical sprays. Subtropica 3: 15-16.
DOIDGE, E. M. 1938. Some South African Fusaria. Bothalia 3:
331-483.
DOIDGE, E. M. 1950. The South African fungi and lichens to the end
of 1945. Bothalia 5: 1-1094.
DOIDGE, E. M., BOTTOMLEY, A. M., VAN DER PLANK, J. E. &
PAUER, G. D. 1953. A. revised list of plant diseases in South
Africa. Union of South Africa Department of Agriculture Science
Bulletin No. 346: 1-122.
DU TOIT, J. J. 1968. Root rot of young maize plants — the causal
fungi. South African Journal of Agricultural Science 1 1: 595-604.
DU TOIT, J. J. 1969. Root rot of young maize plants and certain
mycological factors pertaining to the soil. Phytophylactica 1:
51-56.
DU TOIT, J. J. & INGAMELLS, C. J. 1972. Stubby root of chicory
induced by Fusarium oxysporum. Phytophylactica 4: 101-104.
DUTTON, M. F. & WESTLAKE, K. 1985. Occurrence of myco-
toxins in cereals and animal feedstuffs in Natal, South Africa.
Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 68:
839-842.
EDMONSTONE-S AMMONS, C. P. 1957. Pineapples. Black spot:
symptoms and control. Farming in South Africa 32, 11: 22-25.
EDMONSTONE-S AMMONS, C. 1958. Some aspects of black spot in
pineapple. South African Journal of Agricultural Science 1:
111-120.
EICKER, A. 1969. Microfungi from surface soil of forest communities
in Zululand. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 53:
381-392.
EICKER, A. 1970a. Ecological observations on soil fungi. South Afri-
can Journal of Science 66: 327-334.
EICKER, A. 1970b. Vertical distribution of fungi in Zululand soils.
Transactions of the British Mycological Society 55: 45-57.
EICKER, A. 1974. The mycoflora of an alkaline soil of the open-
savannah of the Transvaal. Transactions of the British Myco-
logical Society 63: 281-288.
EICKER, A. 1975. A survey of the antimycotic and antibacterial activ-
ity of soil microfungi from Transvaal. Journal of South African
Botany 41: 187-198.
EICKER, A. 1976. Non-parasitic mycoflora of the phylloplane and
litter of Panicum coloratum. Transactions of the British Myco-
logical Society 67: 275-28 1 .
ENGELBRECHT, M. C., SMIT, W. A. & KNOX-DAVIES, P. S.
1983. Damping-off of rooibos tea, Aspalathus linearis. Phytophy-
lactica 15: 121-124.
FERREIRA, J. F. & KNOX-DAVIES, P. S. 1984. Occurrence and
control of Fusarium oxysporum on sweet melon seed. Phytophy-
lactica 16: 67-69.
FERREIRA, J. F. & KNOX-DAVIES, P. S. 1985. Germination of
microconidia of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis in melon seed
exudates. Phytophylactica 17: 51-52.
GELDERBLOM, W. C. A., THIEL, P. G., VAN DER MERWE,
K. J., MARASAS, W. F. O. & SPIES, H. S. C. 1983. A
mutagen produced by Fusarium moniliforme. Toxicon 21:
467-473.
GELDERBLOM, W. C. A., MARASAS, W. F. O., STEYN, P. S.,
THIEL, P. G., VAN DER MERWE, K. J., VAN ROOYEN,
P. H., VLEGGAAR, R. & WESSELS, P. L. 1984a. Structure
elucidation of fusarin C, a mutagen produced by Fusarium
moniliforme . Journal of the Chemical Society Chemical Commu-
nications 1984: 122-124.
GELDERBLOM, W. C. A., THIEL, P. G., MARASAS, W. F. O. &
VAN DER MERWE, K. J. 1984b. Natural occurrence of fusarin
C, a mutagen produced by Fusarium moniliforme , in com. Jour-
nal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 32: 1064-1067.
GELDERBLOM, W. C. A., THIEL, P. G. & VAN DER MERWE,
K. J. 1984c. Metabolic activation and de-activation of fusarin C, a
mutagen produced by Fusarium moniliforme . Biochemical Phar-
macology33: 1601-1603.
GERLACH, W. 1977. Fusarium lunulosporum spec. nov. von Grape-
fruit aus Siidafrika, ein Fruchtfauleerreger. Phytopathologische
Zeitschrift 88: 280-284.
GERLACH, W. & NIRENBERG, H. 1982. The genus Fusarium— a
pictorial atlas. Mitteilungen aus der Biologischen Bundesanstalt
fur Land- und Forstwirtschaft Berlin-Dahlem 209: 1—4-06.
GORDON, W. L. 1960. The taxonomy and habitats of Fusarium spe-
cies from tropical and temperate regions. Canadian Journal of
Botany 38: 643-658.
GORTER, G. J. M. A. 1961. A guide to South African literature on
plant diseases. Republic of South Africa Department of Agricul-
tural Technical Services Miscellaneous Publication: 1-106.
GORTER, G. J. M. A. 1973. A new guide to South African literature
on plant diseases. Republic of South Africa Department of Agri-
cultural Technical Services Technical Communication No. Ill:
1-61.
GORTER, G. J. M. A. 1977. Index of plant pathogens and the
diseases they cause in cultivated plants in South Africa. Republic
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
99
of South Africa Department of Agricultural Technical Services
Science Bulletin No. 392: 1-177.
GORTER, G. J. M. A. 1981. Index of plant pathogens (II) and the
diseases they cause in wild growing plants in South Africa.
Republic of South Africa Department of Agriculture and Fisheries
Science Bulletin No. 398: 1-84.
GORTER, G. J. M. A. 1982a. Supplement to index of plant pathogens
(I) and the diseases they cause in cultivated plants in South Africa.
Republic of South Africa Department of Agriculture Science Bul-
letin No. 392 (Supplement): 1—14.
GORTER, G. J. M. A. 1982b. A newly revised guide to South African
literature on plant diseases. Republic of South Africa Department
of Agriculture Technical Communication No. 179: 1-65.
GRAHAM. J. H., BRLANSKY, R. H., TIMMER, L. W., LEE,
R. F., MARAIS, L. J. & BENDER, G. S. 1985. Comparison of
citrus tree declines with necrosis of major roots and their associa-
tion with Fusarium solani. Plant Disease 69: 1055-1058.
HEAN, A. F. 1947. A wilt disease of Crotalaria juncea Linn. (Sunn
hemp) found in South Africa. Union of South Africa Department
of Agriculture Science Bulletin No. 255: 1-15.
HOFMEYR, J. D. J., NEL, E. A. & LOEST, F. C. 1948. A new
tomato variety. Farming in South Africa 23: 805-808.
HOLZ, G. 1976. Race two of Fusarium oxysporum f. lycopersici in the
Republic of South Africa. Phytophylactica 8: 87-88.
HOLZ, G. & KNOX-DAVIES, P. S. 1974. Resistance of onion selec-
tions to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cepae. Phytophylactica 6:
153-156.
HOLZ, G. & KNOX-DAVIES, P. S. 1976. Fusarium oxysporum f.
cepae on Oxalis species in the western Cape Province. Phytophy-
lactica 8: 89-90.
HOLZ, G. & KNOX-DAVIES, P. S. 1985a. Production of pectic
enzymes by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cepae and its involvement
in onion bulb rot. Phytopathologische Zeitschrift 112: 69-80.
HOLZ, G. & KNOX-DAVIES, P. S. 1985b. Pectic enzyme produc-
tion by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cepae: induction by cell walls
from different parts of onion bulbs at different growth stages.
Phytopathologische Zeitschrift 112: 81-92.
HOLZ, G. & KNOX-DAVIES, P. S. 1985c. Natural sugars present in
different parts of onion bulbs at different growth stages in relation
to pectic enzyme production by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cepae.
Phytophylactica 17: 157-161.
INGAMELLS, C. J. 1974. Root rot of pyrethrum in South Africa.
Phytophylactica 6: 203-204.
JOOSTE, W. J. 1965. Crown rot in wheat. Farming in South Africa
41:13-15.
KELLERMAN, T. S., MARASAS, W. F. O., PIENAAR, J. G. &
NAUDE, T. W. 1972. A mycotoxicosis of Equidae caused by
Fusarium moniliforme Sheldon. Onderstepoort Journal of
Veterinary Research 39: 205-208.
KELLERMAN, T. S„ VAN DER WESTHUIZEN, G. C. A.,
COETZER, J. A. W., ROUX, C., MARASAS, W. F. O.,
MINNE, J. A. , BATH, G. F. & B ASSON, P. A. 1980. Photosen-
sitivity in South Africa, n. The experimental production of the
ovine hepatogenous photosensitivity disease geeldikkop (Tribulo-
sis ovis) by the simultaneous ingestion of Tribulus terrestris plants
and cultures of Pithomyces chartarum containing the mycotoxin
sporidesmin. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 47:
231-261.
KOTZfi, J. M. 1985. Symptoms of mango blossom malformation.
South African Mango Grower' s Research Report 5: 26-27 .
KRIEK, N. P. J. & MARASAS, W. F. O. 1983. Trichothecene
research in South Africa: 273-284. In Y. Ueno, Trichothecenes —
chemical, biological and toxicological aspects. Kodansha,
Toyko.
KRIEK, N. P. J., MARASAS, W. F. O., STEYN, P. S., VAN RENS-
BURG, S. J. & STEYN, M. 1977. Toxicity of a moniliformin-
producing strain of Fusarium moniliforme var. subglutirums
isolated from maize. Food and Cosmetics Toxicology 15:
579-587.
KRIEK, N. P. J., KELLERMAN, T. S. & MARASAS, W. F. O.
1981a. A comparative study of the toxicity of Fusarium verticil-
lioides (= F. moniliforme) to horses, primates, pigs, sheep and
rats. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 48: 129-131.
KRIEK, N. P. J., MARASAS, W. F. O. & THIEL, P. G. 1981b.
Hepato- and cardiotoxicity of Fusarium verticillioides (F. monili-
forme) isolates from southern African maize. Food and Cosmetics
Toxicology 19: 447-456.
KROGER, W. 1970a. Wurzel- und Stammfaule bei Mais. I. Stamm-
faule verursachende Organismen im ‘Mais-Dreieck’ Sudafrikas.
Phytopathologische Zeitschrift 67: 259-270.
KRUGER, W. 1970b. Wurzel- und Stammfaule bei Mais. II. Wurzel-
faule verursachende Organismen im ‘Mais-Dreieck’ Sudafrikas.
Phytopathologische Zeitschrift 67: 345-35 1 .
KRUGER, W., 1970c. Wurzel- und Stammfaule bei Mais. III. Die
Wirkung von Bodenbearbeitungsmassnahmen auf Stammfaule.
Phytopathologische Zeitschrift 68: 1-8.
KRUGER, W. 1970d. Wurzel- und Stammfaule bei Mais. IV. Die
Wirkung von Diinger auf das Auftreten der Wurzel- und Stamm-
faule. Phytopathologische Zeitschrift 68: 334—345.
KRUGER, W. & JOOSTE, W. J. 1967. Important maize diseases and
control measures. Farming in South Africa 43: 1-7.
KRUGER, W., GROBLER, J. H. & DU PLOOY, J. 1965. The in-
fluence of fertilizers and plant population on the incidence of stalk
rot in maize. South African Journal of Agricultural Science 8:
703-716.
LAMPRECHT, S. C., KNOX-DAVIES, P. S. & MARASAS,
W. F. O. 1984. Fusarium spp. associated with diseased root and
crown tissue of annual Medicago spp. Phytophylactica 16:
195-200.
LE ROUX, G., ESCHENBRUCH, R. & DE BRUIN, S. I. 1973. The
microbiology of South African wine-making. Part VIH. The
microflora of healthy and Botrytis cinerea infected grapes. Phyto-
phylactica 5: 51-54.
MAAS, E. M. C. & KOTZli, J. M. 1981. Fungi associated with root
diseases of wheat in South Africa. Phytophylactica 13: 155-156.
MAAS, E. M. C. & KOTZk, J. M. 1985. Fusarium equiseti crown rot
of wheat in South Africa. Phytophylactica 17: 169-170.
MALAN, E. F. 1954. Pineapple production in South Africa with spe-
cial reference to the eastern Transvaal. Union of South Africa
Department of Agriculture Bulletin No. 339: 1-28.
MARASAS, W. F. O. 1982. Mycotoxicological investigations on com
produced in esophageal cancer areas in Transkei: 29-40. In C. J.
Pfeiffer, Cancer of the esophagus. Vol. I. CRC Press, Boca
Raton, Florida.
MARASAS, W. F. O. & BREDELL, I. H. 1973. Mycoflora of South
African lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) seed. Phytophylactica 5:
89-94.
MARASAS, W. F. O., KELLERMAN, T. S., PIENAAR, J. G. &
NAUDE, T. W. 1976. Leukoencephalomalacia: a mycotoxicosis
of Equidae caused by Fusarium moniliforme Sheldon. Onderste-
poort Journal of Veterinary Research 43: 1 13-122.
MARASAS, W. F. O., KRIEK, N. P. J., VAN RENSBURG, S. J.,
STEYN, M. & VAN SCHALKWYK, G. C. 1977. Occurrence of
zearalenone and deoxynivalenol, mycotoxins produced by Fusa-
rium graminearum Schwabe, in maize in southern Africa. South
African Journal of Science 73: 346-349.
MARASAS, W. F. O., KRIEK, N. P. J., WIGGINS, V. M., STEYN,
P. S., TOWERS, D. K. & HASTIE, T. J. 1979a. Incidence,
geographical distribution, and toxigenicity of Fusarium species in
South African com. Phytopathology 69: 1181-1185.
MARASAS, W. F. O., VAN RENSBURG, S. J. & MIROCHA, C. J.
1979b. Incidence of Fusarium species and the mycotoxins,
deoxynivalenol and zearalenone, in com produced in esophageal
cancer areas in Transkei. Journal of Agricultural and Food
Chemistry 27: 1 108-11 12.
MARASAS, W. F. O., WEHNER, F. C., VAN RENSBURG, S. J. &
VAN SCHALKWYK, D. J. 1981 . Mycoflora of com produced in
human esophageal cancer areas in Transkei, Southern Africa.
Phytopathology 71: 792-796.
MARASAS, W. F. O., NELSON, P. E. & TOUSSOUN, T. A. 1984a.
Toxigenic Fusarium species: identity and mycotoxicology. Penn-
sylvania State University Press, University Park, Pennsylvania,
pp. 328.
MARASAS, W. F. O., KRIEK, N. P. J., FINCHAM, J. E. & VAN
RENSBURG, S. J. 1984b. Primary liver cancer and oesophageal
basal cell hyperplasia in rats caused by Fusarium moniliforme.
International Journal of Cancer 34: 383-387 .
MARASAS, W. F. O., NELSON, P. E. & TOUSSOUN, T. A. 1985a.
Fusarium dlamini, a new species of Fusarium from southern
Africa. Mycologia 77: 971-975.
100
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
MARASAS, W. F. O., NELSON, P. E. & TOUSSOUN, T. A.
1985b. Taxonomy of toxigenic Fusaria: 3-14. In J. Lacey,
Trichothecenes and other mycotoxins. John Wiley, Chichester,
England.
MARTIN, P. M. D., GILMAN, G. A. & KEEN, P. 1971. The inci-
dence of fungi in foodstuffs and their significance based on a
survey in the eastern Transvaal and Swaziland: 281-290. In I. F.
H. Purchase, Mycotoxins in human health. MacMillan, London.
MILLS, L. J. 1984. Fusarium oxysporum on subterranean clover in
South Africa. Phytophylactica 16: 89-92.
MILLS, L. J. 1985. Root rot of Trifolium subterraneum induced by
Fusarium solani. Phytopathologische Zeitschrift 113: 1-8.
NEL, E. A. 1949. The Durbot tomato variety. Farming in South Africa
November 1949: 473-474.
NELSON, P. E., TOUSSOUN, T. A. & MARASAS, W. F. 0. 1983.
Fusarium species: an illustrated manual for identification. Penn-
sylvania State University Press, University Park, Pennsylvania,
pp. 193.
NEWSHOLME, S. J., KELLERMAN, T. S., VAN DER WESTHUI-
ZEN, G. C. A. & SOLEY, J. T. 1983. Intoxication of cattle on
kikuyu grass following army worm (Spodoptera exempta) inva-
sion. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 50: 157-167.
OELOFSEN, O. N. 1950. Investigation of cereal diseases in the
western Cape Province. Union of South Africa Department of
Agriculture Science Bulletin No. 289: 1-17.
PAPENDORF, M. C. 1976. The soil mycoflora of an Acacia karroo
community in the western Transvaal. Bothalia 12: 123-127.
PIENAAR, J. G. 1977. Nuwere veterinere neuropatologiese toestande
in Suid-Afrika. Journal of the South African Veterinary Associa-
tion 48: 13-18.
PIENAAR, J. G., KELLERMAN, T. S. & MARASAS, W. F. O.
1981. Field outbreaks of leukoencephalomalacia in horses con-
suming maize infected by Fusarium verticillioides in South
Africa. Journal of the South African Veterinary Association 52:
21-24.
PUTTERILL, K. M. 1954. Some graminicolous species of Helmin-
thosporium and Curvularia occurring in South Africa. Bothalia 6:
347-378.
RABIE, C. J.& LUBBEN, A. 1984. The mycoflora of sorghum malt.
South African Journal of Botany 3: 251-255.
RABIE, C. J. & THIEL, P. G. 1985. Toxigenic fungi and mycotoxins
in sorghum malt. Institute of Brewing, central and southern Afri-
can section , Proceedings of the 1st Scientific and technical con-
vention, Johannesburg: 252-260.
RABIE, C. J., VAN RENSBURG, S. J., VAN DER WATT, J. J. &
LUBBEN, A. 1975. Onyalai — the possible involvement of a
mycotoxin produced by Phoma sorghina in the aetiology. South
African Medical Journal 49: 1647-1650.
RABIE, C. J., LUBBEN, A., LOUW, A. I., RATHBONE, E. B.,
STEYN, P. S. & VLEGGAAR, R. 1978. Moniliformin, a myco-
toxin from Fusarium fusarioides. Journal of Agricultural and
Food Chemistry 26: 375-379.
RABIE, C. J., MARASAS, W. F. O., THIEL, P. G., LUBBEN, A. &
VLEGGAAR, R. 1982. Moniliformin production and toxicity of
different Fusarium species from southern Africa. Applied and
Environmental Microbiology 43: 517-521.
REUVENI, R. 1985. Macrophomina phaseolina and Fusarium spp. on
melon roots in South Africa. Phytophylactica 17: 109.
RUKENBERG, F. H. J. & CROOKES, C. A. 1985. Report on mango
malformation survey in the Tshipise area, 16-19 December 1984.
South African Mango Grower’s Association Research Report 5:
6-9.
RUSSELL, G. H. & BERJAK, P. 1983. Some attempted control
measures against Fusarium verticillioides in stored maize seeds.
Seed Science and Technology 1 1 : 441^448.
RUSSELL, G. h., MURRAY, M. E. & BERJAK, P. 1982. Storage
microflora: on the nature of the host/pathogen relationship in
fungal-infected maize seeds. Seed Science and Technology 10:
605-618.
SCOTT, D. B. 1965. Toxigenic fungi isolated from cereal and legume
products. Mycopathologia et Mycologia Applicata 25: 213-222.
SCOTT, D. B. 1980. Foot and root rot diseases in wheat: dryland-rot.
Farming in South Africa, Wheat. Pamphlet No. G.2.4: 1-7. De-
partment of Agriculture and Fisheries, Pretoria.
SMITH, E. M., WEHNER, F. C. & KOTZE, J. M. 1984. Effect of
soil solarization and fungicide soil drenches on crater disease of
wheat. Plant Disease 68: 582-584.
STEYN, D. G. 1933. Fungi in relation to health in man and animals.
Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Science and Animal Industry
1: 183-212.
STEYN, D. G. 1950. Recent investigations into the toxicity of known
and unknown poisonous plants in the Union of South Africa. XVI.
Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Science and Animal Industry
24: 55-56.
STEYN, M., THIEL, P. G. & VAN SCHALKWYK, G. C. 1978.
Isolation and purification of moniliformin. Journal of the Associa-
tion of Official Analytical Chemists 61: 578-580.
STEYN, P. S., WESSELS, P. L. & MARASAS, W. F. O. 1979.
Pigments from Fusarium moniliforme Sheldon. Structure and 13C
nuclear magnetic resonance assignments of an azaanthraquinone
and three naphthoquinones. Tetrahedron 35: 1551-1555.
SWARTS, D. H. 1978. Die na-oesbeheer van kraagverrotting by pie-
sangs. Boerdery in Suid-Afrika, Piesangs. Pamphlet No.
M. 2/1978: 1-7. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Preto-
ria.
THIEL, P. G. 1978. A molecular mechanism for the toxic action of
moniliformin, a mycotoxin produced by Fusarium moniliforme.
Biochemical Pharmacology 27: 483-486.
THIEL, P. G., MEYER, C. J. & MARASAS, W. F. O. 1982. Natural
occurrence of moniliformin, together with deoxynivalenol and
zearalenone, in Transkeian com. Journal of Agricultural and
Food Chemistry 30: 308-312.
THOMPSON, A. H. 1985. A preliminary survey of fungal diseases of
lucerne in the Republic of South Africa. Republic of South Africa
Department of Agriculture and Water Supply Technical Com-
munication No. 197: 1-26.
VAN DER WALT, S. J. & STEYN, D. G. 1943. Recent investiga-
tions into the toxicity of plants, etc., XII. Onderstepoort Journal
of Veterinary Science and Animal Industry 18: 207-224.
VAN RENSBURG, S. J., PURCHASE, I. F. H. & VAN DER
WATT, J. J. 1971. Hepatic and renal pathology induced in mice
by feeding fungal cultures: 153-161. In I. F. H. Purchase, Myco-
toxins in human health. MacMillan, London.
VAN WARMELO, K. T. 1967. The fungus flora of stock feeds in
South Africa. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 34:
439^150.
VAN WYK, P. S. & BAARD, S. W. 1970. Verticillium dahliae Kleb.
parasitic on a Fusarium species. Phytophylactica 2: 211-212.
VISSER, C. P. N. & KOTZE, J. M. 1979. The susceptibility of three
potato cultivars to Fusarium dry rot and the economic importance
of the disease on the Transvaal highveld. Republic of South
Africa Department of Agricultural Technical Services Technical
Communication No. 158: 1-5.
VISSER, S. 1980. A new wilt disease of tomatoes caused by Fusarium
equiseti in the Republic of South Africa. Phytophylactica 12:
45-57.
WAGER, V. A. 1947. Wilt disease of New Zealand flax. Farming in
South Africa 22: 871-878.
WAGER, V. A. 1972. Records of diseases of ornamental plants not
previously reported in South Africa. Republic of South Africa
Department of Agricultural Technical Services Technical Com-
munication No. 100: 1-14.
WATT, J. M & BREYER-BRANDWIJK, M. G. 1962. The medicinal
and poisonous plants of southern and eastern Africa. 2nd edn.
E. & S. Livingstone. Edinburgh, pp. 1457.
YOUNG, C. N. & MEYERS, A. M. 1979. Opportunistic fungal infec-
tion by Fusarium oxysporum in a renal transplant patient. Sabou-
raudia 17:219-223.
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
101
FUSARIUM SPECIES
The Fusarium species are arranged alphabetically and the hosts and/or substrates from which each species has been recorded are listed
alphabetically under that species together with references to the literature cited. The system of taxonomy and nomenclature of Fusarium used is
that of Nelson el al. (1983). In cases where the names of Fusarium species used in the literature cited cannot be accommodated according to this
system, e.g. F. roseum, the name is indexed as used in the relevant publication(s) with a note that the identity is uncertain. In cases where the
names used in the literature cited are considered to be synonyms of the names accepted by Nelson et al. ( 1983), these names are cited as synonyms
under each species and are also cross-referenced in the alphabetical list, e g. F. verticillioides (Sacc.) Nirenberg is considered to be a synonym
under F . moniliforme Sheldon, but is also included in the alphabetical list under F. verticillioides with a note to ‘see F. moniliforme' . In no case
did the present authors attempt to confirm the identity of any of the Fusarium species or the hosts referred to in the literature cited. The names of
the host plants are given as in the original reference.
acuminatum Ell. & Ev.
Conifers: Darvas etal. (1978)
Eleusine sp.: Kellerman et al. (1980)
Medicago saliva'. Marasas & Bredell (1973); Thompson (1985)
Medicago spp. : Lamprecht et al. (1984)
Panicum coloratum : Kellerman etal. (1980)
Pastures: Kellerman etal. (1980)
Pennisetum typhoides: Rabie etal. (1982)
Sorghum cajfrorum : Rabie etal. (1982)
Tribulus terrestris: Kellerman etal. (1980)
Triticum aestivum: Kellerman et al. (1980)
aquaeductuum (Radik. & Rabenh.) Lagerh.
= aquaeductuum (Radik. & Rabenh.) Lagerh. var. medium
Wollenw.
Conifers: Darvas etal. (1978)
aquaeductuum var. medium (See aquaeductuum )
avenaceum (Fr.) Sacc.
Hordeum vulgare: Rabie etal. (1982)
Medicago spp.: Lamprecht etal. (1984)
Panicum coloratum: Eicker(1976)
Pastures: Kellerman et al. (1980)
Soil: Eicker(1969)
Sorghum caffrorum: Rabie & Liibben (1984); Rabie & Thiel (1985)
Triticum aestivum: Putterill (1954)
chlamydosporum Wollenw. & Reinking
= chlamydosporum Wollenw. & Reinking vai.fuscum Gerlach
= fusarioides (Frag. & Cif.) Booth
Aspalathus linearis: Engelbrecht etal. (1983)
Cynodon lemfuensis: Gerlach & Nirenberg (1982)
Pastures: Kellerman etal. (1980)
Pennisetum typhoides: Kriek & Marasas (1983); Marasas et al.
(1984a); Rabie etal. (1975, 1982)
Phaseolus vulgaris: Marasas et al. (1984a); Rabie et al. (1978)
Sorghum caffrorum: Rabie & Liibben (1984); Rabie & Thiel (1985);
Rabie etal. (1978, 1982)
Tribulus terrestris: Kellerman et al. (1980)
Zea mays: Kriek & Marasas (1983); Marasas (1982); Marasas et al.
(1981)
chlamydosporum vai.fuscum (See chlamydosporum)
ciliatum Lk.
Epichloe zahlbruckneriana: Gerlach & Nirenberg (1982)
concolor Reinking (Identity uncertain)
Pennisetum typhoides: Gerlach & Nirenberg (1982); Rabie et al.
(1982)
Pyrus malus: Combrink et al. (1985)
Sorghum caffrorum: Rabie & Liibben (1984); Rabie & Thiel (1985)
crookwellense Burgess, Nelson & Toussoun
Panicum laevifolium: Burgess et al. (1982)
Triticum aestivum: Burgess et al. (1982)
culmorum (W. G. Smith) Sacc.
Conifers: Darvas etal. (1978)
Eleusine sp.: Kellerman et al. ( 1980)
Panicum coloratum: Kellerman et al. (1980)
Pastures: Kellerman et al. (1980)
Persea americana: Darvas & Kotze (1981)
Soil: Eicker (1969, 1970b); Smith et al. ( 1984)
Triticum aestivum: CMI (1984a); Jooste (1965); Kellerman et al.
(1980); Maas & Kotze (1981); Scott (1980); Smith et al. ( 1984)
decemcellulare Brick
Persea americana: Darvas (1978); Darvas & Kotze(1979, 1981)
dlamini Marasas, Nelson & Toussoun
Soil: Marasas etal. (1985a)
equiseti (Corda) Sacc.
Arachis hypogaea: Martin etal. (1971)
Conifers: Darvas etal. (1978)
Cucumis melo: Reuveni (1985)
Lycopersicum esculentum: Visser (1980)
Medicago sativa: Thompson (1985)
Medicago spp.: Lamprecht etal. (1984)
Pastures: Kellerman etal. (1980)
Pennisetum typhoides: Rabie etal. (1982)
Soil: Eicker ( 1974, 1975); Papendorf (1976); Smith et al. (1984)
Sorghum caffrorum: Martin et al. (1971); Rabie & Liibben (1984);
Rabie & Thiel (1985); Rabie etal. (1982)
Triticum aestivum : Maas & Kotze (1985); Smith et al. (1984)
Zea mays: Kriek & Marasas (1983); Marasas (1982); Marasas et al.
(1981)
equiseti var. longipes (See longipes)
fusarioides (See chlamydosporum)
graminearum Schwabe
Medicago spp. Lamprecht et al. (1984)
Panicum coloratum: Eicker ( 1976)
Soil: Eicker (1976)
Triticum aestivum: Maas & Kotze (1981); Oelofsen (1950); Scott
(1980)
Zea mays: Aucock et al. ( 1980); Gelderblom et al. (1984b); Kriek &
Marasas (1983); Kriiger (1970a, 1970b, 1970c); Kriiger &
Jooste (1967); Kriiger et al. (1965); Marasas (1982); Marasas et
al. (1977, 1979a, 1979b, 1981, 1984a); Steyn (1933); Thiel et
al. (1982); Watt & Breyer-Brandwijk ( 1962)
heterosporum Nees
Trifolium subterraneum: Mills (1984)
heterosporum Nees var. congoense (Wollenw.) Wollenw. (Identity
uncertain)
Grasses infected with ergot or smut: Gerlach & Nirenberg ( 1982)
lateritium Nees
= lateritium Nees var. longum Wollenw.
= stilboides Wollenw.
Citrus spp.: Booth (1971); Gerlach & Nirenberg (1982); Gordon
(1960)
Coffea spp.: Gerlach & Nirenberg ( 1982)
lateritium var. longum (See lateritium)
longipes Wollenw. & Reinking
= equiseti (Corda) Sacc. var. longipes (Wollenw. & Reinking)
Joffe
Eleusine sp.: Kellerman etal. (1980)
Panicum coloratum: Kellerman et al. (1980)
Triticum aestivum: Kellerman et al. (1980)
lunulosporum Gerlach
Citrus paradisi: Gerlach ( 1977); Gerlach & Nirenberg (1982)
lycopersici (See oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici)
merismoides Corda
Sorghum caffrorum: Rabie & Liibben ( 1984); Rabie & Thiel (1985)
moniliforme Sheldon
= verticillioides (Sacc.) Nirenberg
Ananas comosus: Edmonstone-Sammons (1957, 1958)
Arachis hypogaea: Van Warmelo (1967)
Cereals: Scott (1965); Van Rensburg et al. (1971)
102
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
Conifers: Darvas etal. (1978)
Feeds: Van Warmelo (1967)
Hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
Legumes: Scott (1965); Van Rensburg etal. (1971)
Medicago sativa : Van Warmelo (1967)
Musa spp: Swarts (1978)
Oryza sativa: Gorter (1977)
Panicum coloratum : Eicker (1976)
Pastures: Kellerman etal. (1980)
Pennisetum typhoides : Marasas et al. (1984a); Rabie et at. (1982);
Steyn etal. (1978)
Per sea americana: Darvas (1979)
Phaseolus vulgaris: Van der Walt & Steyn (1943)
Saccharum officinarum: Booth (1971); CMI (1977b)
Soil: Eicker ( 1969); Papendorf( 1976)
Sorghum caffrorum: Rabie & Liibben (1984); Rabie & Thiel (1985);
Rabie etal. (1982)
Tribulus terrestris: Kellerman etal. (1980)
Voandzeia subterranea: Martin et al. ( 197 1 )
Zea mays: Aucock etal. (1980); CMI (1977b); Coetzer et al. (1985);
Du Toit (1968); Gelderblom et al. (1983, 1984a, 1984b,
1984c); Kellerman et al. (1972); Kriek & Marasas (1983);
Kriek et al. (1981a, 1981b); Kruger (1970a, 1970b, 1970c,
1970d); Kruger & Jooste (1967); Kruger et al. (1965); Marasas
etal. (1976, 1977, 1979a, 1979b, 1981, 1984a, 1984b, 1985b);
Pienaar (1977); Pienaar et al. (1981); Russell & Berjak (1983);
Russell et al. (1983); Steyn (1933, 1950); Steyn et al. (1979);
Thiel etal. (1982); Van Warmelo (1967)
moniliforme var. subglutinans (See subglutinans)
oxysporum Schlecht. emend. Snyd. & Hans.
= oxysporum Schlecht. var. redolens (Wollenw.) Gordon
Arachis hypogaea: Rabie et al. (1982)
Aspalathus linearis: Engelbrecht et al. (1983)
Chrysanthemum cinerariaefolium: Ingamells (1974)
Cichorium intybus: Du Toit & Ingamells (1972)
Citrus spp.: Gordon (1960)
Conifers: Darvas etal. (1978)
Cucumis melo: Ferreira & Knox-Davis (1984, 1985); Reuveni
(1985)
Hordeum vulgare: Rabie etal. (1982)
Man: Young & Meyers (1979)
Mangifera indica: Rijkenberg & Crookes (1985)
Medicago sativa: Thompson (1985)
Medicago spp.: Lamprecht etal. (1984)
Musa spp.: Deacon etal. (1985)
Narcissus pseudonarcissus: Gordon ( 1 960); Wager (1972)
Panicum coloratum: Eicker (1976)
Persea americana: Darvas (1979)
Soil: Darvas (1979); Eicker (1969, 1970a, 1970b, 1974, 1975);
Papendorf (1976); Rijkenberg & Crookes (1985)
Sorghum caffrorum: Rabie & Liibben (1984); Rabie & Thiel (1985);
Rabie etal. (1982)
Trifolium subterraneum: Mills (1984)
Vitis vinifera: Le Roux etal. (1973)
Zea mays: Du Toit (1968); Kruger (1970a, 1970b, 1970c, 1970d);
Kruger & Jooste (1967)
oxysporum Schlecht. f. sp. cepae (Hanz.) Snyd. & Hans.
Allium cepa: Holz & Knox-Davies (1974, 1976, 1985a, 1985b,
1985c)
Oxalis pes-caprae: Holz & Knox-Davies (1976)
Oxalis zeekoevleyensis: Holz & Knox-Davies (1976)
oxysporum Schlecht. f. sp. cubense (E. F. Smith) Snyd. & Hans.
Musa spp.: CMI (1977a); Deacon (1984a, 1984b); Deacon et al.
(1985); Swarts (1978)
oxysporum Schlecht. f. sp. cucumerinum Owen
Cucumis sativus: Booth (1971); CMI (1984b)
oxysporum Schlecht. f. sp. lycopersici (Sacc.) Snyd. & Hans.
= lycopersici Bruschi
Lycopersicum esculentum: Hofmeyr et al. (1948); Holz (1976); Nel
(1949); Visser(1980)
oxysporum Schlecht. f. sp. melonis Snyd. & Hans.
Cucumis melo: Ferreira & Knox-Davies (1984, 1985)
oxysporum Schlecht. f. sp. niveum (E. F. Smith) Snyd. & Hans.
Citrullus vulgaris: Booth (1971)
oxysporum Schlecht. f. sp. phormii Wager
Phormium tenax: Wager (1947)
oxysporum Schlecht. f. sp. vasinfectum (Atk.) Snyd. & Hans.
Gossypium spp.: Booth (1971)
oxysporum var. redolens (See oxysporum)
poae (Peck) Wollenw.
Saccharum officinarum: Booth (1971)
Zea mays: Kriek & Marasas (1983); Marasas (1982); Marasas et al.
(1981)
roseum Link (Identity uncertain)
Cereals: Scott (1965); Van Rensburg etal. (1971)
Legumes: Scott (1965); Van Rensburg etal. (1971)
Soil: Eicker (1975)
sacchari var. subglutinans (See subglutinans)
sambucinum Fuckel
Humulus lupulus: Gorter (1977)
Persea americana: Darvas (1978); Darvas & Kotze (1979)
Soil: Eicker (1974, 1975)
scirpi Lambotte & Fautr.
Medicago spp.: Burgess etal. (1985); Lamprecht et al. (1984)
Soil: Burgess etal. (1985)
Sorghum caffrorum: Rabie & Liibben (1984)
Zea mays: (Kriiger ( 1970a)
scirpi Lambotte & Fautr. var. compactum Wollenw. (Identity uncer-
tain)
Sorghum caffrorum: Rabie & Liibben (1984); Rabie & Thiel (1985)
semitectum Berk. & Rav.
Conifers: Darvas etal. (1978)
Musa sp.: Swarts (1978)
Pennisetum typhoides: Rabie etal. (1982)
Soil: Eicker (1969)
Sorghum caffrorum: Martin etal. (1971); Rabie & Liibben (1984)
solani (Mart.) Appel & Wollenw. emend. Snyd. & Hans.
Chrysanthemum cinerariaefolium: Ingamells (1974)
Citrus limonia: Graham etal. (1985)
Crotalaria juncea: Hean (1947)
Cucumis melo: Reuveni (1985)
Hyacinthus sp.: Gordon (1960); Wager (1972)
Insects: Gordon (1960)
Medicago sativa: Thompson (1985)
Persea americana: Darvas (1978); Darvas & Kotze (1979)
Soil: Eicker (1974, 1975); Papendorf (1976)
Sorghum caffrorum: Rabie & Liibben (1984); Rabie & Thiel (1985)
Trifolium subterraneum: Mills (1985)
Vitis vinifera: Le Roux etal. (1973)
Zea mays: Kriiger (1970a)
sp. (See Fusarium species undetermined at end of this list)
sporotrichioides Sherb.
Soil: Papendorf (1976)
Voandzeia subterranea: Kriek & Marasas (1983); Martin et al.
(1971)
stilboides (See lateritium)
subglutinans (Wollenw. & Reinking) Nelson, Toussoun & Marasas
= moniliforme Sheldon var. subglutinans Wollenw. & Reinking
= sacchari (Butler) Gams var. subglutinans (Wollenw. & Rein-
king) Nirenberg
Air: Crookes & Rijkenberg (1985a)
Ananas comosus: Gordon (1960)
Conifers: Darvas etal. (1978)
Crotalaria juncea: Hean (1947)
Mangifera indica: Crookes & Rijkenberg (1985a, 1985b); Dieckman
etal. (1982); Kotz6 (1985)
Morus japonica: Crookes & Rijkenberg (1985a)
Saccharum officinarum: Booth (1971)
Soil: Crookes & Rijkenberg (1985a); Rijkenberg & Crookes (1985)
Sorghum caffrorum: CMI (1978); Rabie & Liibben (1984); Rabie &
Thiel (1985); Rabie etal. (1982)
Syzygium cordatum: Crookes & Rijkenberg (1985a)
Zea mays: Aucock et al. (1980); CMI (1978); Gelderblom et al.
(1984b); Kriek & Marasas (1983); Kriek et al. (1977); Kriiger
et al. (1965); Marasas (1982); Marasas et al. (1977, 1979a,
1979b, 1981, 1984a); Steyn (1933); Steyn et al. (1978); Thiel
(1978); Thiel et al. (1982); Watt & Breyer-Brandwijk (1962)
verticillioides (See moniliforme )
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
103
Fusarium species undetermined
Ananas comosus: Malan (1954)
Arachis hypogaea: Van Warmelo (1967)
Cereals: Dutton & Westlake (1985)
Conifers: Darvas etal. (1978)
Crotalaria juncea : Hean (1947)
Eleusine sp.: Kellerman etal. (1980)
Feeds: Dutton & Westlake (1985); Van Warmelo (1967)
Glycine max : Dutton & Westlake (1985)
Hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
Mangifera indica: Crookes & Rijkenberg (1985a)
Medicago sativa: Thompson (1985); Van Warmelo (1967)
Musa spp.: Deacon etal. (1985)
HOSTS AND
Panicum coloratum : Eicker (1976); Kellerman et al. (1980)
Pastures: Kellerman etal. (1980)
Pennisetum clandestinum: Bryson (1982); Newsholme etal. (1983)
Pennisetum typhoides : Rabie et al. (1975)
Soil: Crookes & Rijkenberg (1985a); Eicker (1969, 1970b, 1974,
1975); Van Wyk & Baard (1970)
Solanum tuberosum: Combrink & Prinsloo (1975); Combrink et al.
(1975); Visser&Kotzd (1979)
Tribulus terrestris: Kellerman et al. (1980)
Triticum aestivum: Kellerman etal. (1980)
Zea mays: Du Toit (1969); Dutton & Westlake (1985); Kruger
(1970a, 1970b); Kruger & Jooste (1967); Van Warmelo (1967)
The hosts and substrates are listed alphabetically and the Fusarium species recorded on each are listed alphabetically. References to the
literature cited can be found under the relevant Fusarium species. The names of the host plants are given as in the original reference.
Air
F. subglutinans
F . oxysporum f. sp. melonis
F. solani
Allium cepa L.
F. oxysporum f. sp. cepae
Cucumis sativus L.
F. oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum
Ananas comosus (L.) Merr.
F. moniliforme
F. subglutinans
F. sp.
Arachis hypogaea L.
F. equiseti
F. moniliforme
F. oxysporum
F. sp.
Aspalathus linearis (Burm. f.) R. Dahlg.
F. chlamydosporum
F. oxysporum
Cereals
F. moniliforme
F. roseum
F. sp.
Chrysanthemum cinerariaefoiium (Trev.) Bocc.
F. oxysporum
F. solani
Cichorium intybus L.
F. oxysporum
Citruilus vulgaris Schrad.
F. oxysporum f. sp. niveum
Citrus limonia Osbeck
F . solani
Citrus paradisi Macf.
F. lunulosporum
Citrus spp.
F . latent ium
F. oxysporum
Cynodon lemfuensis Vanderyst
F. chlamydosporum
Eleusine spp.
F . acuminatum
F. culmorum
F. longipes
F. sp.
Epichloe zahlbruckneriana P. Henn.
F . ciliatum
Feeds
F . moniliforme
F. sp.
Glycine max (L.) Merr.
F. sp.
Gossypium spp.
F. oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum
Grasses infected with Ergot or Smut
F. heterosporum var. congoense
Hay
F. moniliforme
F. sp.
Hordeum vulgare L.
F. avenaceum
F. oxysporum
Humulus lupulus L.
F. sambucinum
Hyacinthus sp.
F. solani
Coffea spp. Insects
F. lateritium F ■ solani
Conifers
F. acuminatum
F. aquaeductuum
F . culmorum
F. equiseti
F. moniliforme
F. subglutinans
F. oxysporum
F. semitectum
F. sp.
Crotalaria juncea L.
F. solani
F. subglutinans
F. sp.
Legumes
F. moniliforme
F. roseum
Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.
F. equiseti
F. oxysporum f. sp. ly coper sici
Man
F. oxysporum
Mangifera indica L.
F. oxysporum
F. subglutinans
F. sp.
Cucumis melo L.
F. equiseti
F. oxysporum
Medicago sativa L.
F. acuminatum
F. equiseti
104
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
F. moniliforme
F. oxysporum
F. solani
F. sp.
Medicago spp.
F. acuminatum
F. avenaceum
F. equiseti
F. graminearum
F. oxysporum
F. scirpi
Morus japonica L.
F. subglutinans
Musa spp.
F. moniliforme
F. oxysporum
F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense
F. semitectum
F. sp.
Narcissus pseudonarcissus L.
F. oxysporum
Oryza sativa L.
F . moniliforme
Oxalis pescaprae L.
F . oxysporum f. sp. cepae
Oxalis zeekoevleyensis R. Knuth
F. oxysporum f. sp. cepae
Panicum coloratura L.
F. acuminatum
F. avenaceum
F. culmorum
F . graminearum
F. longipes
F. moniliforme
F. oxysporum
F. sp.
Panicum laevifolium Hack.
F. crookwellense
Pastures
F. acuminatum
F. avenaceum
F. chlamydosporum
F. culmorum
F. equiseti
F. moniliforme
F. sp.
Saccharum officinarum L.
F . moniliforme
F. poae
F. subglutinans
Soil
F. avenaceum
F. culmorum
F. dlamini
F. equiseti
F. graminearum
F. moniliforme
F. oxysporum
F. roseum
F. sambucinum
F. scirpi
F. semitectum
F . solani
F. sporotrichioides
F. subglutinans
F. sp.
Solanum tuberosum L.
F. sp.
Sorghum caffrorum Beauv.
F. acuminatum
F. avenaceum
F. chlamydosporum
F. concolor
F. equiseti
F. merismoides
F. moniliforme
F. oxysporum
F. sambucinum
F. scirpi
F. scirpi var. compactum
F. semitectum
F. solani
F. subglutinans
Syzygium cordatum Hochst.
F. subglutinans
Tribulus terrestris L.
F. acuminatum
F. chlamydosporum
F. moniliforme
F. sp.
Trifolium subterraneum L.
F. heterosporum
F. oxysporum
F. solani
Pennisetum clandestinum Hochst. ex Chiov.
F. sp.
Pennisetum typhoides (Burm.) Stapf & Hubbard
F. acuminatum
F. chlamydosporum
F. concolor
F. equiseti
F. moniliforme
F. semitectum
F. sp.
Persea americana Mill.
F. culmorum
F. decemcellulare
F. moniliforme
F. oxysporum
F. sambucinum
F. solani
Phaseolus vulgaris L.
F. chlamydosporum
F. moniliforme
Phormium tenax Forst.
F. oxysporum f. sp. phormii
Pyrus malus L.
F. concolor
F. lateritium
Triticum aestivum L.
F. acuminatum
F . avenaceum
F . crookwellense
F. culmorum
F. equiseti
F. graminearum
F. longipes
F. sp.
Vitis vinifera L.
F. oxysporum
F. solani
Voandzeia subterranea (L.) Thomas
F. moniliforme
F. sporotrichioides
Zea mays L.
F. chlamydosporum
F. equiseti
F. graminearum
F. moniliforme
F. oxysporum
F. poae
F. scirpi
F. solani
F. subglutinans
F. sp.
Bothalia 17,1: 105-119(1987)
The genus R ubus (Rosaceae) in South Africa. IV. Natural hybridiza-
tion
SPIES, J. J.*, STIRTON, C. H.** and DU PLESSIS, H.*
Keywords: chromosomes, hybridization, polyploidy, reproduction, Rosaceae, Rubus, South Africa, speciation
ABSTRACT
The genus Rubus L. is represented in southern Africa by the subgenera Eubatus Focke and Idaeobatus Focke. A
combination of morphological data, data on the reproductive systems of some collections and meiotic chromosome beha-
viour indicates that a hybrid swarm in the eastern Transvaal was formed subsequent to the hybridization between
R. cuneifolius Pursh. taxon B (subgenus Eubatus) and R. longepedicellatus (C. E. Gust.) C. H. Stirton (subgenus Idaeoba-
tus). Other examples of intra- and intersubgeneric hybridization were found during this study of the South African material.
These instances, with examples found in the literature, indicate that the subgeneric subdivisions of Rubus are artificial.
Three different methods were used to analyse the meiotic chromosome configurations. The genome relationship
system of Alonso & Kimber (1981) and Kimber & Alonso (1981) and the modification of the binomial system of Jackson &
Casey (1980) by Spies (1984) proved to be the most sensitive for distinguishing between alio-, segmental alio- and
autoploids.
U1TTREKSEL
Die genus Rubus L. word in suidelike Afrika verteenwoordig deur die subgenera Eubatus Focke en Idaeobatus Focke.
’n Kombinasie van morfologiese data, data rakende die voortplantingsisteem van sommige eksemplare en meiotiese
chromosoomgedrag het aangetoon dat ’n basterkompleks in die oostelike Transvaal gevorm is na die verbastering van R.
cuneifolius Bailey takson B (subgenus Eubatus) en R. longepedicellatus (C. E. Gust.) C. H. Stirton (subgenus Idaeobatus).
Ander voorbeelde van intra- en intersubgeneriese verbastering is tydens hierdie studie in Suid-Afrika gevind en in samehang
met verdere voorbeelde in die literatuur toon dit aan dat die onderverdeling van die genus Rubus in subgenera kunsmatig is.
Drie verskillende metodes is gebruik om die meiotiese chromosoomgedrag van die plante te vergelyk. Die genoom-
verwantskapsisteem van Alonso & Kimber ( 198 1 ) en Kimber & Alonso (1981) en die modifikasies op die binomiale sisteem
van Jackson & Casey (1980) deur Spies (1984) toon aan dat hierdie twee metodes die sensitiefste is om tussen alio-,
segmentele alio- en outoplo'iede plante te onderskei.
CONTENTS
Introduction 105
Materials and methods 105
Results 106
Morphology 106
Reproductive system 107
Chromosome behaviour 110
Discussion Ill
Morphology Ill
Reproductive system 114
Chromosome behaviour 114
Hybridization 116
T axonomic implications of hybridization 117
Conclusions 118
References 118
INTRODUCTION
The genus Rubus is somewhat enigmatic in South
Africa. It forms part of our indigenous flora but natura-
lized species also occur. Most taxa are considered weedy
and yet they are included in a breeding programme to
* Botanical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and Water
Supply, Private Bag X101 , Pretoria 0001 , South Africa.
** The Herbarium, Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew, Richmond,
Surrey, TW9 3AE, United Kingdom.
improve their agricultural production. The genus also
contains agamic species as well as sexual species. In
short, it is a taxonomist’s nightmare.
The genus Rubus comprises 12 subgenera of which
two are represented in South Africa: Eubatus Focke and
Idaeobatus Focke. In South Africa the subgenus Euba-
tus, or true brambles or blackberries, includes only
exotics, whereas the subgenus Idaeobatus, or rasp-
berries, contains a few exotics and a number of indige-
nous species (Spies & Du Plessis 1985).
It has been proposed (Stirton 1981a & b; Spies & Du
Plessis 1985) that the problems with Rubus taxonomy in
South Africa are caused by the occurrence of apomixis,
hybridization among indigenous species and between in-
digenous and exotic species, the variation produced by a
breeding program with subsequent escape from cultiva-
tion and inadequately collected herbarium material.
Each paper in this series has dealt with a different
aspect of the cytogenetics of Rubus in South Africa. The
aim of this paper is to determine whether natural hybridi-
zation occurs in the South African Rubus complex and
whether this hybridization, if it does occur, is restricted
to intrasubgeneric taxa.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The following specimens were collected in the veld,
transplanted in the Pretoria National Botanical Garden
106
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
and subsequently examined for this study [All the her-
barium specimens are housed in the Pretoria National
Herbarium (PRE)]:
R. cuneifolius Pursh taxon A*
NATAL. — 2929 (Underberg): 14 km from Swartberg to Underberg
(-CD), Stirton 8154. 2930 (Pietermaritzburg): 3 km from Midmar Dam
to Lions River (-CB), Henderson & Gaum 93; 5 km from Pieter-
maritzburg to Mooi River (-CB), Liengme s.n.; Highlands Farm
(-CD), Beard 720. 3029 (Kokstad): 40 km from Underberg to Swart-
berg (-BA), Stirton 8157; 1 1 km from Harding to Weza (-DB), Stirton
8102.
R. cuneifolius Pursh taxon B*
TRANSVAAL. — 2329 (Pietersburg): 3 km from Haenertsburg to
Boyne (-CC), Stirton 8033 . 2330 (Tzaneen): Modderfontein (-CC),
Stirton 8013. 2430 (Pilgrim’s Rest): 1 km from Graskop to Sabie
(-DD), Stirton 9800, 9859, 9861, 9868, Henderson & Gaum 18. 2530
(Lydenburg): 5 km from Lydenburg to Sabie (-AB), Henderson &
Gaum 37; Dullstroom (-AC), Stirton 7255. 2628 (Johannesburg):
Heidelbergkloof (-CA), Bredenkamp 123.
R. longepedicellatus (C. E. Gust.) C. H. Stirton
TRANSVAAL. — 2329 (Pietersburg): 10 km from Tzaneen to Hae-
nertsburg (-CC), Stirton 5755; near Pietersburg (-CD), McCullum 13.
2330 (Tzaneen): Pietersburg District (-CC), McCullum 887. 2430 (Pil-
grim’s Rest): Pilgrim’s Rest (-DB), Killick & Strey 2420; Mariepskop
(-DB), Van der Schijff4562; Bourke’s Luck (-DB), Viljoen 27; 1 km
from Graskop to Sabie (-DD), Henderson & Gaum 22, Stirton 9862.
2530 (Lydenburg): 5 km from Lydenburg to Sabie (-AB), Henderson
& Gaum 36; Brooklands (-BA), Henderson cfc Gaum 14; Nelspruit
(-BD), Mogg (PRE 55710). 2531 (Komatipoort): Kruger National Park
(-AB), Van der Schijff 1228 .
NATAL. — 3029 (Kokstad): Ngeli Forest (-DA), Stirton 8135.
R. x proteus sp. ined.
TRANSVAAL. — 2329 (Pietersburg): 10 km from Tzaneen to Hae-
nertsburg (-CC), Stirton 5756, 5783. 2430 (Pilgrim’s Rest): Spekboom
River, Burgersfort (-CB), Henderson 319; Bourke’s Luck (-DB),
Henderson & Gaum 27 , 28, 29, 31, 32; Mac-Mac Waterfalls (-DD),
Henderson & Gaum 20; 6 km from Pilgrim’s Rest to Lydenburg
(-DD), Henderson & Gaum 33; 1 km from Graskop to Sabie (-DD),
Stirton 9797, 9798, 9799, 9801, 9855, 9860, 9862, 9863, 9864, 9865,
9866, 9867, 9869. 2530 (Lydenburg): 3 km from Brooklands to
Hendriksdal (-BA), Henderson & Gaum 72; 33 km from Nelspruit to
Sabie (-BD), Henderson & Gaum 11.
R. rigidus X R. cuneifolius taxon A
NATAL. — 2929 (Underberg): 25 km from Himeville to
Boesmansnek (-DC), Henderson & Gaum 50, 51 .
This cytotaxonomic study concentrated upon a possi-
ble hybrid swarm in the area between Graskop and Sabie
in the eastern Transvaal Lowveld (2430DD) (Stirton
1984). The cytogenetical methods and results were re-
ported by Spies & Du Plessis (1985 & 1986) and Spies,
Du Plessis & Liebenberg (1985). These investigations
included meiotic analyses of aceto-carmine anther
squashes and embryo sac studies.
In order to compare morphological characters of the
plants, the following 18 characters were studied (Table
* For some time we have been aware that R. cuneifolius Pursh might
comprise more than one taxon. The discovery of hybrid swarms in the
eastern Transvaal confirmed this. We have been unable to clarify the
identity of the Transvaal forms of R. cuneifolius, except that they may
be conspecific with R. pascuus Bailey. However, the cytogenetic infor-
mation would argue against recognizing R. pascuus at the species
level. We feel, therefore, that until its status is resolved, we will refer
to it as R. cuneifolius Pursh taxon B, whereas the Natal form (or typical
form) of R. cuneifolius will be referred to as taxon A.
1): 1, inflorescence length; 2, flowers single or double;
3, flower colour; 4, petal length; 5, width of petal; 6,
form of sepal apex; 7, ratio between length of petal and
sepal; 8, rachis length; 9, length of petiole; 10, thorns
straight or recurved; 11, leaf surface; 12, form of leaf
apex; 13, leaf margin; 14, form of stipule; 15, number of
leaflets per leaf in the floricane; 16, primocane leaves;
17, terminal leaf length and 18, form of base of terminal
leaflet.
In an attempt to determine cytogenetically whether
hybridization has occurred, three different methods were
used to compare the observed chromosome configura-
tions of polyploids with the expected values for auto-
ploids. These methods included the genomic relationship
system developed by Kimber and others (Kimber &
Hulse 1978; Driscoll 1979; Driscoll, Bielig & Darvey
1979; Alonso & Kimber 1981; Espinasse & Kimber
1981; Kimber & Alonso 1981; Kimber, Alonso & Sallee
1981; Alonso & Kimber 1984), the binomial system de-
veloped by Jackson et al. (Jackson & Casey 1980 &
1982; Jackson & Hauber 1982) and the modification of
this binomial system by Spies (1984). Computer pro-
grammes were used to calculate these values. The model
with the smallest average sum of squares between the
expected and observed frequencies, was considered as
being the most appropriate model.
RESULTS
Morphology
The two probable species participating in the forma-
tion of the apparent hybrid swarm were identified as
R. longepedicellatus (C. E. Gust.) C. H. Stirton of the
subgenus Idaeobatus Focke and R. cuneifolius Pursh
taxon B belonging to the subgenus Eubatus Focke. It
was assumed that these species formed morphologically
distinct hybrids, referred to here collectively as, R. x
proteus C. H. Stirton. The morphology of the different
plants is summarized in Table 1 .
In order to determine whether the R. x proteus speci-
mens are intermediate between the putative parental
species or fall within the normal infraspecific variation
of these species, all R. cuneifolius B and R. longepedi-
cellatus specimens in the National Herbarium (PRE)
were scored for the selected characters listed in Materials
and methods. These results are also summarized in Table
1 and clearly indicate that both these species are morpho-
logically variable.
Nevertheless, several distinct morphological differ-
ences between R. longepedicellatus and/?, cuneifolius B
were observed. For example, the average petal length in
R. cuneifolius B was 17,1 mm, compared to the average
of 6,4 mm for R. longepedicellatus. R. cuneifolius B is
separated from R. longepedicellatus mainly on flower
colour, petal and rachis lengths, ratio between the
lengths of the petal and the sepal and whether the primo-
cane leaves are pinnate or pinnate/palmate. Characters
that did not contribute to the separation of these species
were double or single flowers, petiole length, straight or
recurved thorns, con- or discolourous leaf surfaces,
number of leaflets per leaf in the floricane and the termi-
nal leaf length. It was therefore decided to use only those
characters which contributed to the separation of the
species, to determine a hybrid index (Figure 1) according
to the method developed by Anderson (1949).
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
107
HI R . longepedicellatus
Ir .x proteus
lengths of the petals and sepals and whether the primo-
cane leaves were pinnate or pinnate/palmate.
HYBRID INDEX
FIGURE 1. — Histogram of hybrid indices for specimens of R. longe-
pedicellatus (area with horizontal lines), R. cuneifolius B (solid
area) and R. x proteus (dotted area).
A scatter diagram (Figure 2) was constructed using the
rachis and petal lengths on the X- and Y-axes respect-
ively. Other morphological characters used in the scatter
diagram were flower colour, the ratio between the
Reproductive system
The presence of both reduced (sexual) and unreduced
(aposporic) embryo sacs was described in the triploid R.
cuneifolius B specimens, Henderson & Gaum 18 and
Stirton 9800 (Spies & Du Plessis 1986). However, all
the reduced embryo sacs were observed to degenerate at
maturity. The one tetraploid specimen, Stirton 9861,
was 100 % sexual, whereas the other one, Stirton 9868,
was only 35 % sexual. In addition to this sexual and
asexual reproduction through seeds, all specimens repro-
duced vegetatively through stemtip-rooting.
In contrast to the apospory described in the R. cuneifo-
lius B specimens, no apospory was observed at any
ploidy level in the R. longepedicellatus sample studied,
except that in the pentaploid R. longepedicellatus speci-
men, Henderson & Gaum 36, all the reduced embryo
sacs degenerated at maturity and the plant was, there-
fore, sterile (Spies & Du Plessis 1986). Vegetative re-
production occurs through rhizomes.
FIGURE 2. Scatter diagram of R. longepedicellatus A . R- cuneifolius B • and R. X proteus ♦ specimens. The occurrence of white flowers
in a specimen is indicated by a solid character in contrast to the line character used for pink flowers. Specimens in which the petal length
exceeds the sepal length are indicated by a A-sign under the character and pinnate leaves are indicated by a A-sign above the character.
TABLE 1. — List of morphological character values allocated to different Rubus specimens
108
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
LZ usofM
Z98PU(RPS uda
8zz i Uim°s u3p uva
8818 HOURS
ggi g uouns
u's 22opz
188 wnnnj,m
81 umnnjoM
OZPZ Ad ms 8 WWX
9£ lump) y uosjdpudfj
ZZ tunvQ y uosuapudfj
pi lump) $> uosjdpuafj
8986 hours
1986 hours
6986 hours
0086 hours
8808 hours
8108 hours
ggzi hours
/ £ uinvp) y uouapudfj
81 lump) y uoudpudfj
£Zl dium/uapajg
L818 hours
P818 hours
Z0I8 hours
■ws diuSuaij
c< £6 uimp) y uosudpudfj
OZL P^g
73
•a s
° o
O cd
^ c3
& JS
O £
G O
£ E
gf 6 |
| E E E.
5 - .§73 5 j= £
££5 fp|> o
S3
I^SE-S-S-Ss-a
U-GO-UhOSGcuH— 1
0 E 73
■g £-1
a ^ E
* -5 „ |p 51
| «J*aglo
<3 _ g.* S-a g
^ c3 ^ C c3 <*-«
0 c 0 c3 o c o
g G g ^ o ‘I g
O O O a> O
Ph J U, Z h U.
(Nn^tovor-ooc^O
CN CO ^ 'O )0 t — 00
AC, acute; AM, acuminate; BC, cordate; BN, cuneate; BO, obtuse; BT, truncate; CC, concolourous; CD, discolourous; Cl, leaf slightly discolourous; FD, flower double; FS, flower single; IL,
long; IN, intermediate; IS, short; LD, double serrate; LR, serrate; LS, serrulate; PA, pinnate; PB, pinnate/palmate; PE, petal = sepal; PI, pink; PL, petal > sepal; PP, pale pink; PS, petal <
sepal; PW, white; SF, flabellate; SL, lanceolate, triangular or falcate; SN, needle, linear or Filiform; TB, some thorns recurved and others straight; TR, recurved; TS, straight.
TABLE 1. — List of morphological character values allocated to different Rubus specimens (continued)
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
109
6986 hours
L 986 hours
9986 hours
P986 hours
£986 HOURS
Z986 hours
0986 hours
ff 86 hours
1086 hours
66 L 6 hours
8616 hours
1616 hours
£819 hours
9818 uouRS
££ iunv£) ip uosjdpudfj
Z£ uinvQ ip uosjapuafi
6Z UinVQ p UOSJ3pU3£j
8Z uinvQ p uosuapuB}}
l_ Z UltlD£) P UOSJ3pU3£f
0Z lunvf) p uosjapus/f
Zl WriBQ p UOSJ3pU3£!
1 1 lunvQ p uosudpudj-j
61 £ uoudpuayf
o «
•fC c3
£• j=
Z C/5 — <N
£C u. ft —
■7 C/0
— u- ft —
z Y? r
cr. S n
< ft
OS U O
H O C
Oh Z
O _1 VO o
<0- on
aiOO
H U <
S J n't
< ft. -
o 2 oo vo v">
•— <; ft, — < <N
C a, — on
2 w
C &•
OS u u ,
H U C
as — U
H <-> C
os - 2
1 H <-> C
OS - 2
H <-> <
CQ »-) m
Z V? ft “2
r- 2 -J - -
<0-
oo — ■ U
H U <
o. z 7
-J oo J,
i 2 u
1 Z. ca
oa 2 O
ft- ^ oa
U
CQ
o
oa
1/0 2 V 0 UO OO
< ft- OH <04
< ft- ro
os (j U I
H U C
CL- .
J 00 _L 1
Z w ^
- to t.
-J £
— u. a.
■ -H S J
■ - < ft-
S 4 ion
i 1 <; ft. (N ro
VO O J Tt- o
< ft- — I.
c ft- -
— U. ft.
7 C/5 i— 1
3 u. ft
I -t S cfl oo
c ft- -
-tSwoo
C ft- VO <H->
<0. —I
-J y1 H <" nr
-1I.S
j yi — ■
Sm loo
<a,nn
= U. ft.
_1 ^ r ’
j oo — t~~
a u. a.
_] oo &. >o
I VO O 00 O O
C ft nr nr
-tSwiNO
C ft. rvl co
> vo W VO OO
<ft.-H —
-f Uwoo
< 0. fO Tf
VO 2 44 r— <N
< ft. — I CO
U J © o
< 0. — r-4
osuo
HOC
as u 2
H U C
I U<
aS Q U
H U C
as Q U
H U C
OS U 2
H U <
as u 2
H U C
oS u 2
H U <
oo u S
H U <
as u 2
HOC
os o 2
HOC
OS U O
H U C
OS U 2
HOC
OS U S
H U C
ft. H m
H oo
ft J m
J oo
CO U. ro
_ I 00
00 z OO
H oo
00 Z ro
H co
H oo ^
ft Z O0
H 00
ft- Z oo
H oo
00 Z OO
H oo
CO Z oo
>4 oo
CQ Z oo
-4 00
“Zn
H co
ft- z *7
-4 oo _L
C o Z
ft L-0 CQ
00 OO O
ft oo CQ
C O U
ft OO CQ
C o O
ft nr qa
oa o O
ft oo CQ
oo O
vo DO
CQ vo O
ft or oo
00 oo O
ft cr CQ
CQ oo O
ft Ov CQ
eo -r O
ft 00 CQ
<2o
ft „ CQ
#20
CQ O Z
0- oo CQ
-25s
5 ^ ^
X M _ c
OJ C fc t
£ E
79 5 -c ■£
" 13
o J | 73
c r- OJ
4= H u. a. ft
oc>;„ « a
E.oS o Rc,
C a O -D o 73
0««(U,C1>04J
U-OSOSo-HHU-H
g 13 c .
n " -a ■
1- H c3 L
3 2 E
i'a
E 13
E .5
U, Z Cu H H
H (N fO ’t to 'O 1
<n m rt 10 \o 00
-5 Cu
X)
3 U C
o ft rt
7* .. 03
Sac s;
^■s -
P n. n
1 o
o 73
■3 oj H
Co ft
a » I
ah
o 0
u « S3
sil
o . .
5 ca "
o ft P
4S o
p
3 c z
c.E ^
.. c
a. r?
S "*5
u c/a e
U 1-1 -
U - - P
« S —
u s o
2 as |
~ 4 J
H -
CQ « J
03 C/5
lib-
5 u «
O -Q> o
- 5 •£
§ -O C3
CQ _
. . Q uT
u J 00
.73 S
mSSV
&
o' o'
°Jv
U £ -a
CQ c 2
o
• - - cv
» z
Cd ^ C/5
.5
c ao
i §i’
8- -S
<bl
o
- ^
U o CL
c c a
straight; TR, recurved; TS, straight.
110
Bothalia 17,1(1987)
TABLE 2. — Average chiasma frequencies and average percentage of chromosome associations per polyploid level in the parental
Rubus species and their putative hybrid
R. cuneifolius B. R. longepedicellatus R. X proteus
Somatic chromosome
* These frequencies are representative of Stirton 9798 and are not included in the averages because this specimen deviates substantial-
ly from the other specimens.
In the putative hybrid, R. x proteus, a mixture of
reproductive systems seems to operate in the specimens.
Only reduced embryo sacs were observed in the diploid
( Henderson & Gaum 28) and one tetraploid specimen
( Henderson & Gaum 27), whereas a mixture of reduced
and aposporic embryo sacs was observed in the remain-
ing specimens ( Henderson & Gaum 20 and 31 and
Stirton 8135, 9798, 9865, 9866 and 9869). Vegetative
reproduction through stemtip-rooting and/or rhizomes
was observed in the specimens studied.
Chromosome behaviour
Both putative parental species contain specimens on
different polyploid levels. R. cuneifolius B has somatic
chromosome numbers of 21 and 28 and R. longepedicel-
latus 14, 28 and 35, whereas their presumed hybrid, R.
x proteus, has somatic chromosome numbers of 14, 21,
28, 35, 42, 49 and 56 (Spies & Du Plessis 1985; Spies et
al. 1985).
The meiotic chromosome behaviour observed in R.
cuneifolius B differs in some respects from that of the
comparable ploidy level of R. longepedicellatus (Spies et
al. 1985). The diploid R. longepedicellatus (Henderson
& Gaum 22) specimen has a chiasma frequency of 1 ,12
per bivalent and that of the putative hybrid diploid speci-
men is similar, namely 1,1 (Table 2). Both diploid speci-
mens usually formed bivalents, with the exception of
two univalents in one R. longepedicellatus cell. The
meiotic chromosome configurations in the triploid R.
cuneifolius B and R. x proteus specimens were very
similar (Table 2). No triploid R. longepedicellatus speci-
men has yet been found.
The method described by Spies (1984) for analysing
the meiotic configurations in the pollen mother cells,
indicates that the tetraploid R. cuneifolius B specimen is
a segmental alloploid tending towards autoploidy,
whereas the tetraploid R. longepedicellatus specimen is a
segmental alloploid tending strongly towards alloploidy.
Some of the tetraploid/?. X proteus specimens appear to
be segmental alloploids tending towards autoploidy
(Henderson & Gaum 27 & 32), whereas one is probably
an alloploid ( Stirton 9798). The tetraploid R. rigidus x
R. cuneifolius A specimen ( Henderson & Gaum 51)
seems to be a segmental alloploid tending towards auto-
ploidy.
In a tetraploid R. x proteus specimen, Stirton 9798,
asynapsis occurred in many pollen mother cells. In this
specimen only 44,6 % bivalents were formed, whereas
the remaining chromosomes were univalents (Table 2).
The pentaploid R. longepedicellatus specimen tended to
form less bivalents than the R. x proteus specimen. No
higher ploidy levels than pentaploid were found in the
parental species and comparison with the hexaploid R. x
proteus specimens was, therefore, not possible. How-
ever, a surprisingly high frequency of multivalents
(14,05 %) was observed in the higher ploidy levels of R.
x proteus (Table 2).
The genome analysis indicated that there is no differ-
ence between the 2:1 and 3:0 models of Alonso &
Kimber (1981), because the x-values in the 2:1 model
were 0,5 for each triploid specimen, indicating that the
two more closely related genomes are also closely re-
lated to the third genome. The model with 0-2 chiasmata
of Jackson & Casey (1982) produced the same expected
values as those obtained by using Kimber’ s models (Ta-
ble 3). In all the specimens studied the average sum of
squares increased from the 0-2 chiasmata model of Jack-
son & Casey (1982) to the 0-4 chiasmata model, indica-
ting that the specimens studied have two or less chias-
mata per chromosome pair (Table 4).
The genome analysis further indicated that the 2:2
model of Kimber & Alonso (1981) shows the best corre-
spondence with the observed frequencies of chromosome
associations in all the tetraploid R. cuneifolius B, R.
longepedicellatus and R. x proteus specimens studied
(Table 5). In each case the value of x was 1, indicating
that two genomes are much more closely related to one
another than to one of the other two genomes. The only
exceptions were Henderson & Gaum 93 (R. cuneifolius
A) and Stirton 9798 (R. x proteus) in which the 3: 1
model fitted with x-values respectively of 0,5 and 0,501 ,
indicating that the three closely related genomes have
also a great affinity for the other genome. In both these
cases the average sum of squares of the expected and
observed frequencies of the accepted model varied very
little from that of the 4:0 models.
In contrast to this phenomenon the model described by
Jackson & Casey (1982) indicates that all the specimens
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
111
TABLE 3. — Comparison between observed chromosome configurations and the expected chromosome configurations in triploids
according to the methods described by Alonso & Kimber (1981), Jackson & Casey (1980, 1982) and Jackson & Hauber (1 982).
Only the model with the lowest average sum of squares is given in this table
Chromosome configuration
R. cuneifolius A
(Liengme s.n.)
R. cuneifolius B
(Stirton 9800)
R. cuneifolius B
(Henderson & Gaum 18)
R. X proteus
(Stirton 9866 )
O = observed frequency; 2:1= Kimber’s model where 2 genomes are more closely related to one another than to the third genome;
0-2 = Jackson’s model where 0 to 2 chiasmata per bivalent are formed; I = univalents; IIC =rod bivalent; IIR =ring bivalent; 111 =
trivalent; SS = average sum of squares of differences between observed and expected frequencies; X = value indicating the relative
distance between the two homologous genomes and the third genome according to Kimber’s models; C =chiasma frequency per half
bivalent.
TABLE 4. — Comparison between the average sum of squares
between the observed and expected values for chromosome
configuration in triploids for different numbers of chias-
mata according to Jackson’s model (Jackson & Casey 1980,
1982; Jackson & Hauber 1982)
studied are autotetraploids with 0-2 chiasmata per chro-
mosome pair and with partly random chromosome asso-
ciations. The model of Spies (1984) indicates that all the
specimens are segmental alloploids but they vary from
almost autoploid (Henderson & Gaum 27, 51, 93 and
Stirton 9868 ) to almost alloploid (Henderson & Gaum
14, 32, Stirton 9798, 9861 & 9862).
DISCUSSION
Morphology
Different methods can be used to ascertain whether a
given specimen represents a true species or a hybrid.
During this study several of these methods were used to
determine the degree of hybridization in the genus Ru-
bus. The first method used was based on morphological
characters and in this process a hybrid index was deter-
mined and a scatter diagram constructed.
A study of morphological characters revealed that R.
cuneifolius B has a short to medium length inflorescence
(Table 1:1) with white flowers, whereas R.
longepedicellatus has a medium to long inflorescence
with pink flowers (2 & 3). R. x proteus has a short to
long inflorescence with pink, pale pink or white flowers.
The petal length (4) varied from 13 to 20 mm in R.
cuneifolius B, from 4 to 10 mm in R. longepedicellatus
and from 4 to 15 mm in R. x proteus. The petal width
(5) varies from 7 to 15 mm in R. cuneifolius B, from 3 to
6 mm in R. longepedicellatus and from 3 to 1 1 mm in R.
x proteus. The same intermediate arrangement position
is observed when the ratio between the lengths of the
petals and sepals (7) is compared; in R. cuneifolius B the
petal is always longer than the sepal, whereas in R. long-
epedicellatus the petal is as long or shorter than the sepal
and R. x proteus has the whole range of ratios. R. cunei-
folius B, has acute petal apices compared to the acumi-
nate apices with an occasional acute apex in R. longepe-
dicellatus and both acute and acuminate apices found in
R. x proteus. The leaf apex (12) is always acute in R.
cuneifolius B and the leaf margin (13) is usually serrate
with a double serrate margin in exceptional cases. R.
longepedicellatus and R. x proteus have acute or acumi-
nate leaf apices and serrulate, double serrate or serrate
leaf margins. The stipules (14) vary from lanceolate/
triangular/falcate to flabellate in R. cuneifolius B, from
needle/linear/filiform to occasionally lanceolate/triangu-
lar/falcate in R. longepedicellatus, with all these differ-
ent shapes being represented in R. x proteus. In contrast
to the pinnate/palmate leaves on the floricanes of R.
cuneifolius B, R. longepedicellatus has pinnate leaves
and both forms occur in R. x proteus. These morpho-
logical data indicate that R. cuneifolius B and R. longe-
pedicellatus are morphologically separate species, and
the intermediate nature of the R. x proteus specimens
suggests a hybrid origin.
The hybrid index diagram (Figure 1) indicates that
only one specimen had all the characters associated with
R. longepedicellatus, whereas four specimens had all the
characters associated with R. cuneifolius B. The hybrid
index also indicates that R. longepedicellatus and R.
cuneifolius B are clearly separated morphologically.
However, a continuous bridge of morphological charac-
ters spans the gap between them in the form of the very
variable hybrid species, R. x proteus (Figures 1, 2, 3 &
112
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
TABLE 5. — Comparison between observed chromosome configurations and the expected chromosome configurations in tetraploids
according to the methods described by Kimber & Alonso (1981), Jackson & Casey (1980,1982) and Jackson & Hauber (1982).
Only the two models with the lowest average sum of squares of each method are shown in the table
R. affinis
( Stirton 5 746 )
R. cuneifolius A
{Henderson & Gaum 93)
R. cuneifolius B
{Stirton 9861 )
R. cuneifolius B
( Stirton 9868)
R. flagellaris
{Henderson & Gaum 2)
R. apetalus
(G. Hemm s.n. )
R. apetalus
(Henderson & Gaum 6 )
R.{ape talus
( Wells 5000)
R. longepedicellatus
{Henderson & Gaum 14)
R. longepedicellatus
( Stirton 9862)
Chromosome configuration
O = observed frequency; 4:0 = Kimber’s model where all 4 genomes are homologous; 3:1= Kimber’s model where 3 genomes are
more closely related to one another than to the fourth genome; 2:2 = Kimber’s model where 2 genomes are more closely related to
one another than to any of the other two genomes, which are also related to one another; 2:1:1 = Kimber’s model where 2 genomes
are more closely related to one another than to the third genome and the third and fourth genomes are not closely related; 0-2 =
Jackson’s model where 0 to 2 chiasmata per bivalent are partially randomly formed; 0-2R = Jackson’s model where 0 to 2 chias-
mata per bivalent are randomly formed; 1 = univalents; 11C = rod bivalent; HR = ring bivalent; 111 = trivalent; IVC = rod quadri-
valents; IVR =ring quadrivalents; SS = average sum of squares of differences between observed and expected frequencies; X = value
indicating the relative distance between the different genomes according to Kimber’s models; C =chiasma frequency per half bivalent.
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
113
TABLE 5. — Comparison between observed chromosome configurations and the expected chromosome configurations in tetraploids
according to the methods described by Kimber & Alonso (1981), Jackson & Casey (1980, 1982) and Jackson & Hauber(1982).
Only the two models with the lowest average sum of squares of each method are shown in the table (continued)
Chromosome configuration
R. pinnatus
(Arnold 1335)
R. X proteus
(Stirton 9798)
R. X proteus
(Henderson & Gaum 2 7)
R. X proteus
(Henderson & Gaum 32)
R. X proteus
(Henderson & Gaum 51)
R. transvaliensis
X R. longepedicellatus
(Henderson & Gaum 10)
Rubus sp.
(Henderson & Gaum 24)
O = observed frequency; 4:0 = Kimber’s model where all 4 genomes are homologous; 3:1= Kimber’s model where 3 genomes are
more closely related to one another than to the fourth genome; 2:2 = Kimber’s model where 2 genomes are more closely related to
one another than to any of the other two genomes, which are also related to one another; 2:1:1 = Kimber’s model where 2 genomes
are more closely related to one another than to the third genome and the third and fourth genomes are not closely related; 0-2 =
Jackson’s model where 0 to 2 chiasmata per bivalent are partially randomly formed; 0-2R = Jackson’s model where 0 to 2 chias-
mata per bivalent are randomly formed; I = univalents; IIC = rod bivalent; I1R =ring bivalent; III =trivalent; IVC =rod quadri-
valents; IVR =ring quadrivalents; SS = average sum of squares of differences between observed and expected frequencies; X = value
indicating the relative distance between the different genomes according to Kimber’s models; C = chiasma frequency per half bivalent
4). It is also indicated that the hybrid species overlaps
morphologically with both parental species. The five
major characters described above (i.e. flower colour,
petal and rachis lengths, ratio between length of petal
and sepal and whether the primocane leaves are pinnate
or pinnate/palmate) are, therefore, essential for dis-
tinguishing between the true species and the different
hybrids.
The pictorialized scatter diagram (Figure 2) indicates
that more hybrid specimens overlap with R. longepedi-
cellatus than withfl. cuneifolius B. R. longepedicellatus
is completely surrounded by R. x proteus specimens in
this diagram. Distinguishing between them will, there-
fore, be more difficult than between R. cuneifolius B and
R. X proteus.
It is evident from these two diagrams that R. cuneifo-
lius B and R. longepedicellatus represent the two ex-
tremes of a very variable population of plants (Figure 3).
It is further evident that R. x proteus, which constitutes
the morphologically intermediate population (Figure 4),
resulted from hybridization between R. cuneifolius B and
R. longepedicellatus and subsequent backcrosses and in-
tercrosses to produce a continously variable hybrid
swarm.
114
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
FIGURE 3. — Specimens of A, Rubus cuneifolius B (Srirton 9861 ); B, R. longepedicellatus (Stirton 8135).
The above hybridization hypothesis is also supported
by the geographical distribution of the species con-
cerned. R. cuneifolius B is restricted to the Transvaal,
whereas R. longepedicellatus specimens were collected
in the Transvaal and Natal, with the majority of them
collected in the Transvaal. The hybrids are restricted to
the Transvaal. The low frequency of R. x proteus and R.
longepedicellatus specimens from Natal in the collection
may be attributed to an insufficient number of Rubus
collections from Natal. The absence of R. cuneifolius B
specimens from Natal in the National Herbarium may be
due to inadequate collecting or to its non-occurrence in
this province. If the latter is true, the paucity of R. x
proteus specimens from Natal is explained. The speci-
men resembling R. x proteus (Henderson & Gaum 51)
from Natal rather represents a hybrid between R. cunei-
folius A and R. rigidus than R. x proteus itself. The
morphological differences between R. cuneifolius B and
R. cuneifolius A are very slight and hybrids between any
one of these taxa and R. longepedicellatus will result in
morphologically similar hybrids. The only differences
observed between these taxa are small differences in the
leaf texture and leaf margin, as well as the frequent oc-
currence of double flowers in R. cuneifolius B. No R.
cuneifolius A specimen with double flowers was ob-
served. Since all R. x proteus specimens have single
flowers, it is possible that R. cuneifolius A and B are
interchangeable as parents with R. longepedicellatus.
Reproductive system
The embryo sac study indicated that both putative pa-
rents produce reduced embryo sacs and may, therefore,
participate in hybridization. It was further demonstrated
that a number of hybrids also produced reduced embryo
sacs and so backcrossing to either parent is also possible.
In addition to reduced reproduction all hybrid specimens
had the potential to reproduce asexually, either through
agamospermy or vegetatively. This apomictic reproduc-
tion provides all plants with the potential to reproduce
even when meiotic chromosome pairing fails after inter-
specific hybridization. Although the embryo sac study
cannot prove the occurrence of hybridization, it indicates
that hybridization is possible and that interspecific hy-
brids may either reproduce sexually or perpetuate them-
selves apomictically.
Chromosome behaviour
The somatic chromosome numbers of 21 and 28 in R.
cuneifolius B and 14, 28 and 35 in R. longepedicellatus
(Table 2) seem to contradict hybridization because,
although a diploid hybrid specimen exists, no diploid R.
cuneifolius B specimen has yet been observed. However,
the occurrence of triploid R. cuneifolius B specimens
with meiotic chromosome behaviour resembling auto-
ploids, suggests that these triploids are formed by polli-
nation of autotetraploids by diploids, both containing
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
115
FIGURE 4.— Specimens of Rubus X proteus. A, Stirton 9799; B, Stirton 9869; C, Stirton 5783; D, Henderson & Gaum 20.
116
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
similar genomes. Therefore, it is suggested that diploid
R. cuneifolius B specimens do exist and that they could
have hybridized with diploid R. longepedicellatus speci-
mens to form diploid hybrids. The occurrence of a di-
ploid hybrid R. x proteus specimen ( Henderson &
Gaum 28), with normal chromosome pairing during
meiosis (Table 2), indicates that the genomic differences
between the parental species are insignificant. The two
diploid parents of R. x proteus probably differ only in a
few gene loci and as such must be considered varieties of
the same species.
This homology between the genomes of R. cuneifolius
B and R. longepedicellatus is also manifested at higher
ploidy levels. However, differences in the meiotic chro-
mosome behaviour of polyploid/?, x proteus specimens
was observed. These differences include a variation in
chromosome pairing from the multivalent formation ex-
pected in autoploids to that expected in alloploids. These
differences can be attributed to either pre- or post-hybri-
dization chromosomal evolution.
Pre-hybridization chromosomal evolution would
suggest that structural chromosome differences were pre-
sent in some plants of the parental populations. Hybridi-
zation between such plants followed by polyploidization
would give rise to segmental alloploids with meiotic
chromosome pairing resembling that of alloploids. The
normal meiosis found in a diploid hybrid specimen ( Hen-
derson & Gaum 28), indicates that only very small struc-
tural differences exist at the diploid level between the
genomes of at least some plants of the parental taxa.
The results of Spies et al. (1985) indicate that the
polyploids of R. cuneifolius B may have had an auto-
ploid origin in contrast to the presumed segmental allo-
ploid origin of R. longepedicellatus polyploids. The
morphological similarity between the diploid and the
segmental alloploids of R. longepedicellatus indicates
that the structural chromosome changes in a genome
were not accompanied by gene mutations which could
produce morphological changes. The differences in
chromosome pairing observed in different R. x proteus
specimens at higher ploidy levels (Tables 3 & 5), might
consequently be attributed to repeated hybridization be-
tween different R. cuneifolius B and R. longepedicella-
tus plants which differ in their structural chromosome
changes.
Post-hybridization chromosomal evolution is due to
structural changes in some chromosomes after hybridiza-
tion. The occurrence of multi valents tends to increase
meiotic instability and to lower fertility. Chromosome
changes that will inhibit multivalent formation will,
therefore, have a selective advantage due to the in-
creased number of bivalents and the consequent increase
in seed viability. These changes form part of the diploi-
dization process. Different R. x proteus specimens may,
therefore, represent different stages of diploidization and
their meiotic chromosome pairing may consequently dif-
fer. However, the post-hybridization hypothesis only
provides for autopolyploidization, whereas the pre-hy-
bridization chromosome evolution hypothesis allows re-
peated hybridization between different ploidy levels or
between plants at the same ploidy level but with different
genomic constitutions. The pre-hibridization hypothesis
is also supported by the greater morphological variation
in R. longepedicellatus when compared with R. cuneifo-
lius B. This larger morphological variation might be the
result of the segmental alloploid origin of the R. longepe-
dicellatus polyploids.
Other interspecific hybrids and intersubgeneric hy-
brids have been described in the literature (See dis-
cussion under hybridization). In addition to the examples
cited in the literature, the hybrid origin of certain taxa
was inferred from their meiotic chromosome pairing.
These taxa include R. cuneifolius A, R. flagellaris, R.
apetalus and R. pinnatus. Chromosome pairing indicated
that R. flagellaris, R. apetalus ( Henderson & Gaum 6
and Wells 5000) and R. pinnatus are true alloploids; the
2:2 model of Kimber & Alonso (1981) was applicable
and an x-value of 1 was obtained (Table 5). The tetra-
ploid R. cuneifolius A specimen tends towards auto-
ploidy, because the 3:1 model was applicable and the
reduced x-value of 0,5 implied an affinity between the
two sets of genomes. The other R. apetalus specimen,
G. Hemm s.n., conforms with the 2:1:1 model and has
an x-value of 0,86. A specimen that appears to be an
amphiploid between R. transvaliensis and R. longepedi-
cellatus had an x-value of 1 when the 2:2 model was
applied. No indication of a hybrid origin could be found
for R. afftnis, where the 4:0 model of Kimber & Alonso
(1981) was applicable.
The results obtained by using the method described by
Alonso & Kimber (1981) and Kimber & Alonso (1981)
to a certain extent correspond with the results obtained
by using the method described by Spies (1984). Accord-
ing to the latter method no specimens are true autoploids
and Arnold 1335, G. Hemm s.n., Henderson & Gaum 6,
14, 24, 27, 32, 51, 93, Stirton 5746, 9861 and 9868 are
segmental alloploids and Henderson & Gaum 2, 10,
Stirton 9798, 9862 and Wells 5000 are alloploids (Spies
et al. 1985). The method of Spies (1984) further distin-
guishes between the segmental alloploids and indicates
that Arnold 1335, Henderson & Gaum 14, 32 and Stir-
ton 9861 tend towards alloploidy, whereas Henderson &
Gaum 24, 27 , 51, 93, Stirton 5746 and 9868 tend to-
wards autoploidy. The rest of the specimens are interme-
diate segmental alloploids.
In contrast to the methods described by Alonso &
Kimber (1981) and Kimber & Alonso (1981) and Spies
(1984) the method described by Jackson & Casey (1982)
and Jackson & Hauber (1982) suggests that all the plants
are autoploids with partial random chromosome associa-
tions and 0-2 chiasmata per chromosome pair (Table 5).
The reason why the latter method did not distinguish
between different chromosomes in the specimens studied
is that the initial assumption of the method, that the
formation of chiasmata is random, does not apply in the
genus Rubus. From random chiasma formation and a
maximum of two chiasmata per chromosome pair, fre-
quencies of 0,25, 0,5 and 0,25 are expected for chromo-
some pairs with no chiasmata, one chiasmata and two
chiasmata respectively. In the genus Rubus these figures
are 0,08, 0,79 and 0,13. This deviation from the ex-
pected values indicates that this method is not applicable
in the genus Rubus.
Hybridization
Hybridization in the genus Rubus is a topic as contro-
versial as the taxonomy of the genus. Taxonomists
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
117
usually adhere to one of two extremes. Either every en-
tity not fitting the species description exactly is regarded
as a hybrid, or the occurrence of hybrids in the genus is
totally ignored.
Bailey (1941-1945) described over 500 different spe-
cies of Rubus for North America without the recognition
of hybrids. He considered three points as essential for
hybridization:
(1) both parents must be in the vicinity of the hybrid;
(2) hybrids occur in small numbers as incidental or as
exceptions to the main population and
(3) characters appear to belong to the parents in various
degrees of combinations.
We support Bailey in his plea that all unidentifiable
examples should not be regarded as hybrids. However,
the validity of his three criteria for hybridization must be
discussed before any conclusions can be made. His claim
that both parents must be in the vicinity of the hybrid was
usually fulfilled in the present study as the hybrids and
the parental taxa often occurred together. However, hy-
brids were sometimes found with no parental form in the
vicinity. This phenomenon may be attributed to one or
more of several factors. Pollination by insects over large
distances might occur and in such cases only the mater-
nal parent need be in the vicinity. Seed could also have
been transported from the mother plant by birds or man,
dropping it far from the parental forms. This may be a
common means of dispersal in southern Africa as the
fruits of Rubus are relished by birds and man. One or
both parents may die and only the hybrid may survive,
especially in a weedy taxon like Rubus where hybrids
might be very aggressive. Only one or neither parent
need therefore be in the vicinity of the hybrid. The first
of Bailey’s criteria for hybridization is therefore invalid.
The second criterion claims that hybrids occur in small
numbers as incidental or exceptions to the main popula-
tion. This will be valid only for newly formed hybrids or
weakly developed hybrids or species which have good
barriers against hybridization. Rubus hybrids are often
aggressive (Bammi 1964) and, due to hybrid vigour,
they may exceed their parents and could become more
abundant than either parental taxon. This is definitely the
case with R. x proteus in the Graskop and Sabie areas of
the Transvaal where the hybrids are exceptionally vigo-
rous and are more abundant than the putative parents.
Characters do not have to be intermediate in the hy-
brids. They may exceed the ranges of both parents, new
traits may be present in the hybrid or the traits of one
parent may be absent in the hybrids due to dominance or
epistasis. An example of the hybrid’s trait exceeding that
of its parents is found in the R. trifidus x R. hirsutus
hybrid which has a larger flower diameter than either
parent (Jinno 1957). In the present study it was observed
that some hybrid specimens had longer rachises than
either parent.
The three criteria for the determination of hybridity
described by Bailey are, consequently, not always valid.
These criteria are all based on morphological characters.
Therefore, cytogenetic studies seem to be the only posi-
tive way of identifying hybrids. However, even this field
is beset with problems and must be handled with extreme
care to obtain meaningful results. This is illustrated by
the different results obtained when using the different
methods described for analysing genome homology.
The consequences of hybridization in Rubus described
in this paper are not restricted to the South African mate-
rial. Interspecific and even intersubgeneric hybridiza-
tion, giving rise to progeny that varies from completely
fertile to totally infertile, has been described elsewhere
(Crane & Darlington 1927; Crane & Thomas 1949; Hes-
lop-Harrison 1953; Jinno 1955, 1957, 1958, 1959, 1961,
1963; Britton & Hull 1959; Haskell & Tun 1961;
Thompson 1961; Bammi 1964; Naruhashi 1971, 1976,
1979; Naruhashi & Masaki 1980).
Morphological, reproductive and cytogenetic evi-
dence indicates that hybridization does occur in the
South African Rubus complex. Futhermore hybridization
appears to take place on both the present taxonomic in-
trasubgeneric and intersubgeneric levels. The progeny
derived from certain intersubgeneric hybridizations are
fertile (Jinno 1958; Newton 1975).
Taxonomic implications of hybridization
In general, F, hybrids and their offspring cannot be
considered to be separate species because they are sterile
due to the failure of normal chromosome pairing during
the meiotic process of sporogenesis. However, when
hybridization is associated with, or followed by chromo-
some doubling, amphiploids are produced with normal
chromosome pairing and good fertility. These new self-
reproducing entities may be regarded as new species
(Davis 1958) because the amphiploids are reproductively
isolated from their parents. In the event of hybridization
resulting in apomixis, each apomictic hybrid might
represent a different genotypic combination of the sexual
parents and a multitude of different self-reproducing en-
tities can be formed. An increase in the degree of hetero-
zygosity of the parental forms will result in an increase in
the number of different recombinant entities. This array
of apomictic self-reproducing entities, which are mor-
phologically different from each other and genetically
isolated, may on superficial study be regarded as sepa-
rate species or microspecies. It is, however, unpractical
to consider each of these apomictic hybrids as separate
species, even if only obligate apomixis exists. In fact,
they belong to an agamic complex without species boun-
daries which rests on pillars of sexual diploid (and poly-
ploid) species. Only cytogenetical studies can distin-
guish between the true sexual species and the array of
apomicts forming the agamic complex.
The fact that many Rubus species are restricted to very
small geographical areas (Bailey 1941-1945; Davis &
Davis 1951) could indicate that they represent either
newly formed species or the abovementioned amphiploid
apomicts. Apomixis is restricted to a small number of
Rubus specimens in South Africa, i.e. the subgenus Eu-
batus. The tendency to describe a sexual hybrid as a
separate species is frequently encountered in this genus.
As an example the diploid species R. toyorensis and R.
nishimuranus can be cited (Jinno 1957; Naruhashi
1971). The F, hybrid between the diploid species R.
trifidus and R. hirsutus is regarded as a separate species,
R. toyorensis, and the backcross of R toyorensis to one
of its parents is regarded as R. nishimuranus. In our
opinion many of the described Rubus ‘species’ are only
118
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
hybrids. This has resulted in a totally artificial classifica-
tion of the genus Rubus, where different morphological
entities are regarded as separate biological species.
An example of the hybridization between different
morphological ‘species’ is found in the species J?. apeta-
lus Poir., R. exsuccus Steud., R. adolfi-friederici Engl,
and R. ecklonii Focke. Although these four ‘species’ are
morphologically distinct, hybridization among them has
produced more intermediate fertile specimens than typi-
cal specimens. In our opinion these four species belong
to one biological species.
Spontaneous hybridization is less common among the
indigenous Rubus species of southern Africa. It occurs
between R. rigidus J. E. Sm. and R. pinnatus Willd.
wherever these species are sympatric, e.g. G. Hemm s.n.
in PRE and was described by Focke (1914). Hybridiza-
tion between indigenous and introduced Rubus species is
observed much more frequently. Such hybridization
takes place between R.fruticosus L. agg. and R. pinna-
tus in disturbed areas of the Cape Peninsula (Adamson &
Salter 1950). Other examples are R. cuneifolius A and R.
pinnatus in Natal (G. Hemm s.n.) and R. affinis and R.
rigidus described by Gustafsson (1933). All these cases
involve hybridization between indigenous Idaeobatus
and introduced Eubatus species. No hybrid swarms of
any of these examples have been recorded to date.
CONCLUSIONS
The combination of morphological, geographical, re-
productive and cytogenetic evidence revealed that natu-
ral hybridization occurs in the South African Rubus com-
plex and also indicated that the hybridization is not re-
stricted to intrasubgeneric hybridization, but that inter-
subgeneric hybridization also occurs. The progeny de-
rived from certain intersubgeneric hybridizations are fer-
tile.
The application of the genome analysis method of
Kimber & Alonso (1981) on the meiotic data indicated
that all the tetraploid plants of R. cuneifolius B, R. fla-
gellaris, R. apetalus, R. longepedicellatus, R. pinnatus
and R. x proteus have two genomes that are more close-
ly related to each other than to the other two genomes
which are also related. This model indicates that all the
plants are segmental alloploids with a tendency towards
alloploidy. The model of Jackson & Casey (1982), on
the other hand, indicates that all the plants are autoploids
with partly random chromosome association. Totally dif-
ferent conclusions can, therefore, be drawn from the
same meiotic data. Neither of the two models mentioned
above distinguishes between any of the specimens stu-
died. However, the chromosome configurations indicate
that chromosome pairing varies between the different
plants. These differences are accentuated by the model
of Spies (1984). It is, therefore, concluded that the latter
model is the most applicable for plants with very short
chromosomes which have a low chiasma frequency, as is
the case in the genus Rubus (Spies et al. 1985).
Finally, interspecific hybridization in the genus Ru-
bus, without loss of fertility in the progeny, indicates
that several of the morphological ‘species’ described in
the past, belong to the same biological species. Since the
difference in fertility levels between ‘intersubgeneric’
hybrids and ‘interspecific’ hybrids is negligible, it was
concluded that the present classification of the genus
Rubus is very artificial and urgently needs a biosyste-
matic revision.
REFERENCES
ADAMSON, R. S. & SALTER, T. M. 1950. Flora of the Cape Penin-
sula. Juta, Cape Town.
ALONSO, L. C. & KIMBER, G. 1981. The analysis of meiosis in
hybrids. II. Triploid hybrids. Canadian Journal of Genetics and
Cytology 23: 221-234.
ALONSO, L. C. & KIMBER, G. 1984. Preferential chromosome
pairing in trisomics. Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenziichter 93: 191-198.
ANDERSON, E. 1949. Introgressive hybridization. Wiley, New
York.
BAILEY, L. H. 1941-1945. Species Batorum. The genus Rubus in
North America. Gentes Herbarium 5: 1-918.
BAMMI, R. B. K. 1964. Cytogenetics and natural hybridization in
Rubus procerus Muell. and R. laciniatus Willd. Ph.D. thesis.
University of California.
BRITTON, D. M. & HULL, J. W. 1959. A black raspberry-black-
berry hybrid. Proceedings of the Society for Horticultural Science
73: 156-157.
CRANE, M. B. & DARLINGTON, C. D. 1927. The origin of new
forms in Rubus L. Genetica 9: 242-280.
CRANE, M. B. & THOMAS, P. T. 1949. Reproductive versatility in
Rubus. III. Raspberry-blackberry hybrids. Heredity 3: 99-107.
DAVIS, H. A. & DAVIS, T. 1951. Rubus concentrations along the
West Virginia-Maryland border. Castanea 16: 101-104.
DAVIS, W. H. 1958. Apomixis, hybridization and speciation in Ru-
bus. Castanea 23: 52-55.
DRISCOLL, C. J. 1979. Mathematical comparison of homologous and
homoeologous chromosome configurations and the mode of ac-
tion of the genes regulating pairing in wheat. Genetics
92:947-951.
DRISCOLL, C. J., BIELIG, L. M. & DARVEY, N. L. 1979. An
analysis of frequencies of chromosome configurations in wheat
and wheat hybrids. Genetics 91: 755-767.
ESPINASSE, A. & KIMBER, G. 1981. The analysis of meiosis in
hybrids. IV. Pentaploid hybrids. Canadian Journal of Genetics
and Cytology 23: 627-638.
FOCKE, W. O. 1910-1914. Species Ruborum I— III . Schweizerbart,
Stuttgart.
GUSTAFSSON, C. E. 1933. Rubi africani. Arkiv for Botanik
26: 1-68.
HASKELL, G. & TUN, N. N. 1961. Developmental sequence of
chromosome number in a cytologically unstable Rubus hybrid.
Genetical Research 1: 10-24.
HESLOP-HARRISON, Y. 1953. Cytological studies in the genus
Rubus L. 1. Chromosome numbers in the British Rubus flora.
New Phytology 52: 22-32.
JACKSON, R. C. & CASEY, J. 1980. Cytogenetics of polyploids. In
W. H. LEWIS, Polyploidy. Plenum Press, New York.
JACKSON, R. C. & CASEY, J. 1982. Cytogenetic analyses of auto-
polyploids: models and methods for triploids to octoploids. Amer-
ican Journal of Botany 69: 487-501 .
JACKSON, R. C. & HAUBER, D. P. 1982. Autotriploid and autote-
traploid cytogenetic analyses: correction coefficients for proposed
binomial models. American Journal of Botany 69: 644-646.
JINNO, T. 1955. The study of hybrids in Rubus. III. R. trifidus Thunb.
X R. palmatoides O. Kuntze. Botanical Magazine 68: 323-326.
JINNO, T. 1957. Cytogenetic and cytoecological studies on some
Japanese species of Rubus. III. Morphological and cytological
investigation of some artificial hybrids. Memoirs of the Ehime
University sect. II, 2: 335-356.
JINNO, T. 1958. Cytogenetic and cytoecological studies on some
Japanese species of Rubus. II. Cytogenetic studies on some F,
hybrids. Japanese Journal of Genetics 33: 201-209.
JINNO, T. 1959. Cytogenetic and cytoecological studies on some
Japanese species of Rubus. VII. Morphological and cytological
study on some natural hybrids. Memoirs of the Ehime University
sect. 11,3: 187-193.
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
119
JINNO, T. 1961 . Cytogenetic study of offsprings of Rubus nishimura-
nus. Memoirs of the Ehime University sect. II, 4: 307-320.
JINNO, T. 1963. Cytological study on triploid of Rubus palmatoides
0. Kuntze. Memoirs of the Ehime University sect. II, 4: 479^485.
KIMBER, G. & ALONSO, L. C. 1981. The analysis of meiosis in
hybrids. III. Tetraploid hybrids. Canadian Journal of Genetics
and Cytology 23: 235-254.
KIMBER, G., ALONSO, L. C. & SALLEE, P. J. 1981. The analysis
of meiosis in hybrids. I. Aneuploid hybrids. Canadian Journal of
Genetics and Cytology 23: 209-219.
KIMBER, G. & HULSE, M. M. 1978. The analysis of chromosome
pairing in hybrids and the evolution of wheat. Proceedings of the
5th International Wheat Genetics Symposium, New Delhi 63-72.
NARUHASHI, N. 1971. Notes on Japanese Rubus (2). Acta Phytotax-
onomica et Geobotanica 25: 4—9.
NARUHASHI, N. 1976. Taxonomical notes on the hybrid between
Rubus trifides and R. hirsutus. I. Morphology. Journal of Geo-
botany 24: 26-34.
NARUHASHI, N. 1979. Notes on Japanese Rubus (3). Journal of
Phytogeography and Taxonomy 27: 38^40.
NARUHASHI, N. & MASAKI, H. 1980. Natural hybrids between
Rubus parvifolius and R. yoshinoi. Journal of Phytogeography
and Taxonomy 28: 45-52.
NEWTON, A. 1975. Rubus L. In C. A. Stace, Hybridization and the
flora of the British Isles. Academic Press, London.
SPIES, J. J. 1984. Determination of genome homology in polyploids.
South African Journal of Science 80: 44-46.
SPIES, J. J & DU PLESSIS, H. 1985. The genus Rubus in South
Africa. I. Chromosome numbers and geographical distribution.
Bothalia 15: 591-596.
SPIES, J. J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1986. The genus Rubus in South
Africa. III. The occurrence of apomixis and sexuality. South Afri-
can Journal of Botany 52: 226-232.
SPIES, J. J., DU PLESSIS, H. & LIEBENBERG, H. 1985. The genus
Rubus in South Africa. II. Meiotic chromosome behaviour. Bo-
thalia 15: 597-606.
STIRTON, C. H. 1981a. Notes on the taxonomy of the genus Rubus in
southern Africa. Bothalia 13: 331-332.
STIRTON, C. H. 1981b. New records of naturalized Rubus in southern
Africa. Bothalia 13: 333-337.
STIRTON, C. H. 1984. Notes on the genus Rubus in southern Africa.
Bothalia 15: 101-106.
THOMPSON, M. M. 1961. Cytogenetics of Rubus. II. Cytological
studies of the varieties ‘Young’, 'Boyson' and related forms.
American Journal of Botany 48: 667-673.
Bothalia 17,1: 121-129(1987)
Ordination by detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) of the
vegetation of Swartboschkloof, Jonkershoek, Cape Province
D. J. MCDONALD*
Keywords: classification, detrended correspondence analysis, forest, fynbos, ordination, Swartboschkloof, vegetation ecology
ABSTRACT
The data of a Braun-Blanquet vegetation classification was ordinated using detrended correspondence analysis (DCA).
This was done at the Fynbos Biome intensive study site, Swartboschkloof, Jonkershoek, to investigate the factors determin-
ing the distribution of the plant communities. Superimposition of environmental data on the DCA ordination confirmed the
indications of the Braun-Blanquet classification that the distribution of plant communities is most strongly correlated with
soil geology and, to a lesser extent, with soil moisture status. The ordination also proved useful for examining the
relationships between the transitional communites and the distinct communities of Swartboschkloof.
UHTREKSEL
Die gegewens van ’n Braun-Blanquetplantegroeiklassifikasie is georden deur gebruik te maak van neigingsverwyde-
ring-ooreenstemmings-analise (DCA). Dit is by die intensiewe studieterrein van die Fynbosbioom, Swartboschkloof,
Jonkershoek, gedoen om die faktore wat die verspreiding van die plantgemeenskappe bepaal, te ondersoek. Deur die
omgewingsdata op die DCA-ordening te plaas, is die aanduidings van die Braun-Blanquetklassifikasie bevestig dat die
verspreiding van plantgemeenskappe die sterkste met grondgeologie en in ’n minder mate met grondvogstatus gekorreleer
is. Dit blyk ook dat die ordening nuttig is om die verhoudings tussen oorgangsgemeenskappe en die bepaalde gemeenskappe
van Swartboschkloof te ondersoek.
INTRODUCTION
Details of the physiography of the Swartboschkloof
study site (Fynbos Biome Project) are given by Van der
Merwe (1966), Werger, Kruger & Taylor (1972) and
McDonald (1983, 1985). Werger et al. (1972) tested the
Braun-Blanquet (B-B) method (Mueller-Dombois &
Ellenberg 1975; Werger 1974) in the floristically rich
vegetation of Swarboschkloof and classified the vegeta-
tion from 44 releves. Eleven years later McDonald (1983
& 1985) re-surveyed Swartboschkloof more intensively
and extensively (201 releves) using the B-B phytosocio-
logical method with the objectives of re-classifying,
mapping the vegetation and relating the plant commu-
nities to the environment.
Classification of the Swartboschkloof vegetation re-
sulted in the description of 21 plant communities which
were then mapped. The relationships between the plant
communities and the environment were, however, not
clear. The classification suggested that the plant commu-
nities are related to soil geology and soil moisture status,
indicating a need for further data analysis using ordina-
tion.
Numerous ordination methods have been tested using
simulated and field data, with the objective of establish-
ing which method summarizes ecological data most ef-
fectively in ‘low-dimensional space’ (see Gauch 1982,
for review of the literature). Detrended correspondence
analysis (DCA) (Hill 1979) stands out as the most suit-
able ordination method for community analysis for very
heterogeneous communities (Hill & Gauch 1980; Gauch
1982). Recent application of DCA includes studies in
island vegetation of the Channel Islands off the coast of
southern California (Westman 1983), in Tasmanian ve-
getation (Brown, Ratkowsky & Minchin 1984), in hazel
* Botanical Research Unit, P.O. Box 471, Stellenbosch 7600.
scrub in northeast Ireland (Cooper 1984) and in savanna,
forests, woodlands and grasslands in South Africa
(Lubke, Morris, Theron & Van Rooyen 1983; Theron,
Morris & Van Rooyen 1984; Whittaker, Morris & Good-
man 1984; Deall 1985). The widespread trend towards
the use of DCA in studies of vegetation, its robustness,
low demands on computer-processing and its ease of
output interpretation (Gauch 1982) were positive indica-
tions for application of DCA in analysing the Swart-
boschkloof vegetation data.
METHODS
Data were collected from 201 plots in the study area.
One hundred of these were placed as close as possible to
soil pits (Fry in prep.). In the fynbos vegetation 50 m2
rectangular plots and in the forest vegetation 200 m2
rectangular plots were used. In the fynbos samples, the
long axes of the plots were aligned with the contour to
avoid downslope variation. The forests are often narrow,
so downslope orientation of the forest sample plots was
necessary.
Species cover-abundance estimates were made using
the Braun-Blanquet scale. Structural data of the vegeta-
tion were collected as were site-related data such as land-
facet, altitude, slope, aspect and geology. Cover of sur-
face rocks, litter and projected canopy cover of the vege-
tation were estimated on a percentage scale at each
sample site. Data on the soils were obtained from Fry (in
prep.).
Since the data collected by Werger et al. (1972) are
compatible with those of this study, they were added to
the data set for further analysis (see below).
Classification
The data were arranged in a two-way species-by-
samples matrix and sorted with the aid of the TABSORT
122
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
D. glabra - P. repens
Transitional Shrublands
E. hispidula-R. sleberi
Shrublands
Releves
FIGURE 1 . — Diagram of the Braun-Blanquet table
of the Mountain Fynbos shrublands of Swart-
boschkloof (after McDonald 1983).
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
123
computer program (Boucher 1977). After initial se-
quencing, it became clear that it would be necessary to
separate the fynbos samples from the forest samples, to
treat them in separate tables. This distinction reflects the
two vegetation types recognized: Mesic Mountain Fyn-
bos ( sensu Moll, Campbell, Cowling, Bossi, Jarman &
Boucher 1984) and Afromontane Forest (White 1978).
The Mountain Fynbos table diagrammatically repre-
sented in Figure 1 was systematically sorted to give 20
groups. Of these, 17 groups were characterized as
specialized communities. Two of the three remaining
groups consist of species with wide ecological tolerance
but with certain differential species of the specialized
communites absent. The third of the latter three groups
represents the widespread species in the fynbos vegeta-
tion of Swartboschkloof.
A similar procedure was followed with the forest
vegetation data (Figure 2). Sequencing of the species-by-
samples matrix resulted in seven groups. Three of these
groups (3, 5 and 6 in Figure 2) were distinguished as true
remnant Afromontane Forest communities; Groups 1 and
2 are communities transitional between fynbos and forest
vegetation and Groups 4 and 7 represent species trans-
gressive between the fynbos/forest transitional commu-
nites and the Afromontane Forest communities.
Ordination
The computer program DECORANA (Hill 1979) was
used to ordinate the data. A number of options are open
to the user of DECORANA. For the purposes of this
study the standard or default option was used. The pro-
gram also allows data subsets to be extracted from the
whole data matrix so that different parts of the matrix
may be ordinated separately (Peet 1980). The results of
the DCA presented here therefore have the following
limitations:
(a) the standard or default option was used throughout
for all parameters except number of samples;
(b) number of samples and samples selected varied
according to each respective ordination; and
(c) DCA scores for Axes I and II only are presented
because the eigenvalues for these axes were closest to
unity (1) in all cases.
The evaluation of DCA here is not a comparison with
other ordination methods to establish its effectiveness.
Rather, it is an evaluation to see what information it may
provide additional to that given by the classification
(McDonald 1983 & 1985). The ‘standard two-step pro-
cedure’ (Gauch 1982) was followed in the analysis:
(a) Summary of community patterns
The three groups of fynbos shrublands, the azonal
seep communities, the forest communities and the fyn-
bos-forest ecotonal communities determined in the clas-
sification, were superimposed on the ordination using
different symbols. Firstly, the full data set (McDonald
1983 & 1985) was analysed (Figure 3), then the forest
data were removed and the residual data analysed (Fig-
ure 4). Thirdly, the data from the azonal seeps and the
forests were excluded and the remaining data ordinated
(Figure 5). In order to test for a ‘disjunction’ between the
A B
R eleves
FIGURE 2. — Diagram of the Braun-Blanquet table of the forest vege-
tation of Swartboschkloof (after McDonald 1983). 1 and 2, transi-
tional between fynbos and forest communities; 3, 5 and 6, true
remnant Afromontane Forest communities; 4 and 7, transgressive
species between fynbos/forest transitional communities and Afro-
montane Forest communities. A, Hartogiella schinoides-Diospy-
ros glabra; B, Diospyros glabra-Rapanea melanophloeos.
Erica hispidula-Diospyros glabra Shrublands and the
Erica hispidula-Restio sieberi Shrublands, the data from
the D. glabra-Protea repens Transitional Shrublands
were excluded (Figure 6). Finally, the data from the
Werger et al. (1972) survey were added to the above-
mentioned full data set, with the objective of examining
(a) the effect of additional data on the ordination and (b)
the interpretation of the Werger et al. (1972) study in
terms of the more recent classification (Figure 7).
(b) Comparison of community patterns with available
environmental data to give an environmental interpreta-
tion of the ordination
The following environmental parameters were sym-
bolically superimposed on the scatter plot representing
DC A Ax i s II
124
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
FIGURE 3. — Ordination (DCA) of the whole data set from McDonald (1983) Afromontane Forest; V, azonal seep communities; o , Erica
hispidula-Restio sieberi Shrublands; ▲ , Diospyros glabra-Protea repens Transitional Shrublands; •, E. hispidula-Diospyros glabra
Shrublands; □, Halleria elliptica-Cliffortia cuneata Shrubland; *, poor releves. 1, Mesic Mountain Fynbos communities; 2-5, seep
communities; 6, Halleria elliptica-Brabejum stellatifolium Short Forest; 7, boulder scree forests; 8, streambank forest.
FIGURE 4. — Ordination (DCA) of
the data from the Mountain Fyn-
bos (McDonald 1983) to de-
monstrate the relationships be-
tween the azonal seeps and fyn-
bos; data from the Afromontane
Forest communities are ex-
cluded. o, Erica hispidula-Res-
tio sieberi Shrublands; ▲ , Dios-
pyros glabra-Protea repens
Transitional Shrublands; •,
Erica hispidula-Diospyros gla-
bra Shrublands; □, Halleria
elliptica-Cliffortia cuneata
Shrubland; V, seep commu-
nities. 1, Mesic Mountain Fyn-
bos communities; 2-5, seep
communities. G, Myrsine afri-
cana-Cliffortia dentata Shrub-
land. One releve is omitted from
cluster 4 in this diagram.
DCA A*is 11 DC A Axis II
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
125
FIGURE 5. — Ordination (DCA) of the Mountain Fynbos data only; azonal seep and forest vegetation data are excluded, o, Erica hispidula-
Restio sieberi Shrublands; A, Diospyros glabra-Protea repens Transitional Shrublands; •, Erica hispidula-Diospyros glabra Shrub-
lands. G, Myrsine africana-Cliffortia dentata Shrubland with 29 & 30 denoting two releves representing this community (see text). E/F,
a cluster of releves from the closely related Rhus angustifolia-Myrsine africana and Myrsine africana-Olea europaea subsp. africana
Shrubland communities. (Note: the communities represented by the symbols G and E/F fall within the Erica hispidula-Diospyros glabra
Shrublands, hence the use of the symbol •.)
FIGURE 6. — Ordination (DCA) of
the Mountain Fynbos data, ex-
cluding data from the transitio-
nal fynbos communities reveals
the disjunction between the
Erica hispidula-Diospyros gla-
bra Shrublands, o, and the
Erica hispidula-Restio sieberi
Shrublands, •. The open
squares, □, represent the Halle -
ria elliptica — Cliffortia cuneala
Shrubland, indicating its affinity
to the E. hispidula-R. sieberi
Shrublands.
the ordination of the augmented data set: altitude, aspect,
slope, geology, soil form, soil series, percentage cover
of rocks and relative moistness or dryness of each sample
site. Only soil geology and soil moisture showed positive
correlation with plant community distribution (Figure 8)
Results for the other environmental parameters are there-
fore not presented.
126
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
4-
v
I 1 I 1 »_J 1 1 L_
o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
DCA Axis I
FIGURE 7. — Ordination (DCA) of the whole data set (McDonald 1983) augmented with data from Werger et al. (1972). +, Afromontane
Forest; V, seep communities; o, Erica hispidula-Restio sieberi Shrublands; A, Diospyros glabra-Protea repens Transitional Shrub-
lands; • , Erica hispidula-Diospyros glabra Shrublands; ■ , Halleria elliptica-Cliffortia cuneata Shrubland; * , poor releves; ■ , Werger et
al. (1972) releves.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Classification of the Me sic Mountain Fynbos
The diagrammatic table representing the Mesic Moun-
tain Fynbos communities (Figure 1) was subdivided into
three main sections; each section represents a group of
communities. The First group (top left of diagram, Figure
1) is the Erica hispidula-Diospyros glabra Shrublands.
These shrublands occur on soils of granite or colluvial
derivation in the mid-central part of the study area. In-
cluded in this group are the essentially azonal ‘seep’
communities which are only included here for conve-
nience of table sorting.
The second group (centre of diagram, Figure 1), the
Diospyros glabra-Protea repens Transitional Shrub-
lands is found on the ecotone between the above-men-
tioned First group and the third group (right-hand side of
Figure 1). The third group is the Erica hispidula-Restio
sieberi Shrublands associated with shallow sandstone-
derived soils above 750 m elevation.
From an applied research and management viewpoint
it was necessary to know which of the above groups
represented groups of easily identifiable communities.
As mentioned, the classification indicated the existence
of two distinct fynbos community groups and one transi-
tional group, but there was doubt as to whether it could
clearly define the relationships of these groups to each
other.
The classification of the fynbos vegetation (apart from
the azonal seep communities) also pointed to a strong
relationship between the pattern of community distribu-
tion and soil parent material at Swartboschkloof. No
other environmental factors appeared to be as strongly
correlated with fynbos community distribution as soil
geology. However, the possibility that one or more other
factors such as availability of water, soil-water retention,
slope, altitude and so on, also markedly affect commu-
nity distribution could not be ruled out.
Classification of the remnant Afromontane Forest
The classification of the forest vegetation (Figure 2)
shows that the two communities transitional between
fynbos and forest are found on colluvial soils. Brabejum
stellatifolium (wild almond) and the fern Blechnum
australe are two species common to the transition com-
munities and the forests along the perennial streams.
This community can in turn be separated from the Dios-
pyros glabra-Rapanea melanophloeos Tall Forest by the
presence of water-loving species such as Cunonia capen-
sis and Ilex mitis. Both granite and sandstone boulders
are found in the streambeds. However, percentage rock
cover in the streambeds is 30 % less on average than on
the sandstone boulder screes where the D. glabra-R.
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
127
DC A A * i s I
FIGURE 8. — Ordination (DCA) of the whole data set (McDonald 1983) with soil geology symbolically superimposed on the scatter of points.
Sandstone-derived soil, •; colluvial soil, V ; granite-derived soil, ■.
melanophloeos Tall Forest and the R. melanophloeos-
Heeria argentea Short Forest are found. The latter two
communites are very similar; they are separated by the
respective absence and presence of H. argentea.
Floristic similarity of the two communities constitut-
ing the remnant Afromontane Forest in Swartboschkloof
indicated the need for further testing of the forest data as
well, to establish whether the separation of this vegeta-
tion into three communities is justified.
Ordination
(a) Summary of community patterns
In the first analysis, the whole data set of the Swart-
boschkloof vegetation was analysed using DECORANA
and the results plotted in a scatter diagram (Figure 3).
The separation of the Afromontane Forest (♦) from
the Mountain Fynbos is immediately apparent; this indi-
cates the difference between these two vegetation types.
The seep communities (V), although part of the fynbos,
are distinctly separate and are also not linked to each
other.
If the forest vegetation is considered first (Figure 3), it
is seen that there are three clusters of points. The first
(cluster 6) represents the Halleria elliptica-Brabejum
stellatifolium Short Forest which, although it is more
forest-like, is transitional between fynbos and forest.
Cluster 7 represents the forests on the boulder screes.
This group of samples was split into two communities in
the classification, based on presence and absence of
Heeria argentea. It is therefore significant that the ordi-
nation clusters these samples together. Cluster 8 repre-
sents the streambank forest which is distinct from the
boulder scree forests.
The fynbos vegetation is more complex than the forest
vegetation and boundaries are not clear-cut, except for
those of the seep communities (clusters 2, 3, 4 & 5) as
noted above (Figure 3).
The community represented by ‘cluster’ 3 is charac-
terized in the classification on the basis of one sample
(192). This is unsatisfactory but the ordination shows
that it has close affinity to the seep community repre-
sented by cluster 5. In Swartboschkloof this community
is very localized but seeps with similar species composi-
tion have been noted in other parts of the Hottentots-
Holland Mountains.
The intergrading of the Mesic Mountain Fynbos com-
munities shown by the classification is borne out by the
ordination (Figure 3, cluster 1). There is a more or less
continuous scatter of points along Axis I which are then
spread vertically by Axis II. By superimposing the three
groups of fynbos communities defined in the classifica-
tion, (McDonald 1983, 1985) the ‘continuum’ nature of
the fynbos shrublands is demonstrated. The open circles
(O) represent the Erica hispidula-Restio sieberi Shrub-
lands; the shaded triangles (A) represent the Diospyros
glabra-Protea repens Transitional Shrublands and the
shaded circles (•) represent the E. hispidula-D. glabra
Shrublands. The open squares (□) represent one of the
ecotonal communities, the Halleria elliptica-Clijfortia
cuneata Shrubland transitional between fynbos and
forest. Asterisks (*) denote poor samples. The difficulty
128
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
experienced in defining clear-cut community boundaries
in the classification of the Mesic Mountain Fynbos is
thus explained by the ‘continuum’ apparent in the ordi-
nation.
To investigate the relationship of the azonal seep com-
munities (V) to the fynbos communities, the forest data
were excluded. The analysis (Figure 4) shows that seep
communities 5 and 4 are close together on Axis I but
widely separated on Axis U and although seep commu-
nity 3 is unique it is closer to 5 on Axis II. At the same
time, seep community 2 is close to 3 on Axis I yet close
to 4 on Axis II. Community 2 is also more closely allied
to the fynbos communities. Interpretation of this pattern
with respect to the environment is discussed below.
The relationship of the fynbos vegetation groups to
one another was investigated by removing the forest and
seep data. The scatter of points in Figure 5 is more
spread out along both Axes I and II because the limiting
effect of the seep and forest data on the ordination is
absent. This ordination does not differ significantly from
the analysis in which the data for the fynbos and seep
communities are included. The fynbos ‘continuum’ is
still obvious but in addition the ordination has separated
two clusters of samples from the main scatter of points.
The first cluster (G in Figure 5) is a cluster of four re-
leves representing the Myrsine africana-Cliffortia den-
tata Shrubland. There were some doubts when classify-
ing the vegetation as to whether releves 29 & 30 (see
Figure 5) actually represented this community. In the
classification the decision was made to retain these two
releves as representing this community. The ordination
vindicated this decision by clustering the four releves of
the above-mentioned community, including releves 29 &
30, together.
The second cluster (E/F in Figure 5) consists of re-
leves from two communities (the Rhus angustifolia-
Myrsine africana Shrubland and the Myrsine africana —
Olea europaea subsp. africana Shrubland) closely re-
lated in the classification. This may be interpreted in two
ways: (1) that, based on the floristic composition, the
classification has made finer distinction between releves
than that achieved by DCA; or (2) that the ordination has
clustered these releves on the basis of some factor or
factors not obvious in the classification.
Checking of the higher axes of DCA did not reveal
any further reason for the differences observed between
the clasification and the first two dimensions of DCA.
The disjunction between the Erica hispidula-Diospyros
glabra and E.hispidula-Restio sieberi Shrublands can be
demonstrated if the data of the seeps, forests and transi-
tional fynbos communities are excluded, and the remain-
ing data ordinated (Figure 6). Since the intergrading
transitional communities have been omitted, the disjunc-
tion between the two above-mentioned fynbos groups is
not real. However, the ordination serves to show the
relationship of these two groups to each other without the
modifying effect of the data from the ecotonal commu-
nities.
The inclusion of data from Werger et al. (1972) (solid
black squares in Figure 7) caused more definite cluster-
ing in the ordination; compare Figures 3 & 7 (augmented
data set). It shows that sampling in the Werger et al.
study was more selective, particularly in that no samples
were taken towards the ‘lower’ end of the fynbos gra-
dient (DCA Axis I: 275^100 in Figure 7).
(b) Environmental interpretation
The habitat data collected at each site were superim-
posed on the ordination to test which factors were in-
fluencing the distribution of the plant communities. The
interaction of environmental factors is complex and it is
difficult to isolate one factor that has an overriding effect
on vegetation pattern. No meaningful conclusions could
be drawn when slope, aspect, altitude and percentage
rock cover were superimposed on the ordination. This is
attributed to the grossness of these factors; the vegetation
is apparently sensitive to more specific habitat factors.
The data for the soils of Swartboschkloof are not com-
prehensive (M. Fry pers. comm.) therefore parameters
such as soil pH, percentage organic C, available N and
P, particle-size distribution and soil-water retention pro-
perties could not be applied to the ordination to investi-
gate their effects. The lack of these data prevented con-
clusive quantitative testing of the hypothesis that avail-
able soil moisture is one of the major determinants of
vegetation patterns in Swartboschkloof. The ordination
of the augmented data set gives the clearest definition of
the environmental gradients. The moisture gradient is
more or less at right-angles to the gradient associated
with the soil parent material (Figure 8).
If the ordination of the fynbos is considered separa-
tely, there is a clear diagonal gradient from shallow
sandstone-derived soils (left) to colluvial and granite-de-
rived soils (right) on Axis I. This corresponds well with
the pattern of fynbos community distribution: the Erica
hispidula-Restio sieberi Shrublands and the Diospyros
glabra-Protea repens Transitional Shrublands are asso-
ciated with sandstone-derived soils whereas the Erica
hispidula-Diospyros glabra Shrublands are found on
colluvial or granite-derived soils. The hypothesis that
soil parent material is a major determinant of fynbos
community distribution in Swartboschkloof is therefore
upheld.
Owing to the azonality of seeps and their dependence
on phreatic water, it is not easy to relate their occurrence
to soil geology. Correlation exists between seeps 2, 3 &
5 (Fig. 8) and sandstone-derived soils. Seep 4 is asso-
ciated with colluvial soils in a bottomland situation,
which could account for its remote displacement from
the other seep communities in the ordination. With the
forest communities it is found that the Halleria ellip-
tica-Brabejum stellatifolium Forest and the Rapanea me-
lanophloeos-C unonia capensis Forest both occur on col-
luvial soils. They are, however, not close together in the
ordination. This separation is attributed to differences in
the water regime: the former community is found along
drier seasonal drainage lines and the latter along moist
perennial streams.
The forests on the sandstone boulder screes are
thought to be associated with the irregular nature of the
substrate. It would be difficult to prove that they owe
their existence to the presence of sandstone rather than
granite boulders, as one may be tempted to conclude
from the ordination.
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
129
CONCLUSIONS
The detrended correspondence analysis has proved
useful in that it has enhanced understanding of the
relationships of the plant communities in Swartbosch-
kloof. The ordination did not give much more informa-
tion than was already known from critically analysing
the classification, but it portrayed the communities in
‘ecological space’ of low dimensions which was helpful
when relating communities or groups of communities to
each other. An additional advantage of using DCA is that
it effectively conveys information to researchers who are
familiar with ordination techniques but unfamiliar with
the Braun-Blanquet approach.
The clear distinction between Mountain Fynbos and
Afromontane Forest was shown together with the posi-
tion of the communities transitional between these two
vegetation types. It was also possible to clearly demon-
strate the ‘continuum’ nature of the fynbos vegetation.
However, the distinct difference between the Erica his-
pidula-Diospyros glabra Shrublands and the E. hispidu-
la-Restio sieberi Shrublands could be shown by remov-
ing the transitional fynbos communities, the seep com-
munities and the forest communities from the data set. In
the ordination the affinity of the seep communities to the
fynbos is evident but their uniqueness stands out.
The unfortunate lack of soil data prevented an in-depth
study of the effects of important soil parameters such as
pH, organic carbon, available N and P, and soil mois-
ture. However, the relative wetness-dryness assessment
of sample sites gave sufficient information to show that
soil moisture plays a secondary role in determining plant
community distribution patterns. Application of the soil
parent material data to the ordination supports the hypo-
thesis that soil geology plays the major part in determin-
ing the distribution of the plant communities, particu-
larly of the Mountain Fynbos, in Swartboschkloof.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The assistance of the following people is gratefully
acknowledged: Mr J. H. Engelbrecht and Miss P. D.
Strydom (Winter Rainfall Region, Department of Agri-
culture and Water Supply); Mr C. Boucher of the Uni-
versity of Stellenbosch and Miss M. Morley, Botanical
Research Unit, Stellenbosch. Professor G. J. Breden-
kamp, Dr J. C. Scheepers and Messrs H. G. Gauch Jr
and A. Rebelo kindly commented on the manuscript.
REFERENCES
BOUCHER, C. 1977. Cape Hangklip Area I. The application of asso-
ciation-analysis, homogeneity functions and Braun-Blanquet tech-
niques in the description ot south-western Cape vegetation
Bothalia 12:293-300.
BROWN, M. J. RATKOWSKY, D. A. & MINCH1N, P. R. 1984. A
comparison of detrended correspondence analysis and principal
co-ordinates analysis using four sets of Tasmanian vegetation
data. Australian Journal of Ecology 9: 273-279.
COOPER, A. 1984. Application of multivariate methods to conserva-
tion management of hazel scrub in northeast Ireland. Biological
Conservation 30:341-357.
DEALL, G. B. 1985. A plant-ecological study of the eastern Transvaal
Escarpment in the Sabie area. M.Sc. thesis, University of Preto-
ria.
FRY, M. St. J. in prep. A detailed characterization of soils under
different fynbos-climate- geology combinations in the south-west-
ern Cape. M.Sc. thesis, University of Stellenbosch.
GAUCH, H. G. 1982. Multivariate analysis in community ecology.
University Press, Cambridge.
HILL, M. 0. 1979. DECORANA — a FORTRAN program for
detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging.
Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
HILL, M. 0. & GAUCH, H. G. 1980. Detrended correspondence
analysis, an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42: 47-58.
LUBKE, R. A., MORRIS, J. W., THERON, G. K. & VAN
ROOYEN, N. 1983. Diversity, structure and pattern in Nylsvley
vegetation. South African Journal of Botany 2: 26-41.
MCDONALD, D. J. 1983. The vegetation of Swartboschkloof,
Jonkershoek, Cape Province, South Africa. M.Sc. thesis, Univer-
sity of Cape Town.
MCDONALD, D. J. 1985. The plant communities of Swartboschkloof,
Jonkershoek. South African National Scientific Programmes
Report No. 104, CSIR, Pretoria.
MOLL, E. J., CAMPBELL, B. M., COWLING, R. M., BOSSI,
L., JARMAN, M. L. & BOUCHER C. 1984. A description of
major vegetation categories in and adjacent to the Fynbos Biome.
South African National Scientific Programmes Report No. 83.
CSIR, Pretoria.
MUELLER-DOMBOIS, D. & ELLENBERG, H. 1974. Aims and
methods of vegetation ecology. John Wiley, New York.
PEET, R. K. 1980. Ordination as a tool for analysing complex data
sets. Vegetatio 42: 171-174.
THERON, G. K., MORRIS, J. W. & VAN ROOYEN, N. 1984.
Ordination of the herbaceous stratum of savanna in the Nylsvley
Nature Reserve, South Africa. South African Journal of Botany
3: 22-32.
VAN DER MERWE, P. 1966. Die flora van Swartboschkloof, Stellen-
bosch en die herstel van die soorte na 'n brand. Annale van die
Universiteit van Stellenbosch 41, Serie A, No. 14: 691-736.
WERGER, M. J. A. 1974. On concepts and techniques applied in the
Zurich-Montpellier method of vegetation survey. Bothalia
11: 309-323.
WERGER, M. J. A., KRUGER, F. J. & TAYLOR, H. C. 1972. A
phytosociological study of the Cape fynbos and other vegetation at
Jonkershoek, Stellenbosch. Bothalia 10: 599-614.
WESTMAN, W. E. 1983. Island biogeography: studies on the xeric
shrublands of the inner Channel Islands, California. Journal of
Biogeography 10: 97-1 18.
WHITE, F. 1978. The Afromontane region. In M. J. A. Werger,
Biogeography and ecology of southern Africa. Junk, The Hague.
WHITTAKER, R. H., MORRIS, J. W. & GOODMAN, D. 1984.
Pattern analysis in savanna-woodlands at Nylsvley, South Africa.
Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 49.
-
Bothalia 17,1: 131-138(1987)
Miscellaneous notes
VARIOUS AUTHORS
CHROMOSOME STUDIES ON AFRICAN PLANTS. 3.
The presentation of chromosome numbers in this
report conforms with the format described in the first
publications of this series (Spies & Du Plessis 1986 a &
b).
POACEAE
Arundinelleae
Arundinella nepalensis Trin.: n = 10, ~35.
TRANSVAAL.— 2530 (Lydenburg): 31 km from Lydenburg to
Roossenekal (-AB), Spies 1615 (n = 10); Frischgewaagd Farm near
Dullstroom (-AC), Spies 1571 (n = —35).
Tristachya leucothrix Nees: n = 24.
TRANSVAAL. — 2430 (Pilgrim’s Rest): Mac-Mac Waterfalls
(-DD), Spies 1433a.
Andropogoneae
Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. subsp. arundinaceum
(Desv.) De Wet & Harlan: n = 20.
TRANSVAAL. — 2529 (Witbank): 10 km from Belfast to Stoffberg
(-DB), Spies 1637.
Bothriochloa insculpta (A. Rich.) A. Camus: n = 30.
TRANSVAAL.- — 2529 (Witbank): 67 km from Lydenburg to Roos-
senekal (-BB), Spies 1624.
Andropogon eucomus Nees: n = 10, 20.
TRANSVAAL. — 2430 (Pilgrim’s Rest): Blyderivierspoort Nature
Reserve (-DB), Spies 1428a (n = 10). 2530 (Lydenburg): 31 km from
Lydenburg to Roossenekal (-AB), Spies 1608 (n = 20).
CAPE. — 3228 (Butterworth): near Cintsa-West turnoff on road from
East London to Butterworth (-CC), Spies 1677 (n = 10).
Andropogon huillensis Rendle: n = ~50.
TRANSVAAL. — 2529 (Witbank): 10 km from Belfast to Stoffberg
(-DB), Spies 1642.
Cymbopogon plurinodis (Stapf) Stapf ex Burtt Davy:
n = 10.
CAPE. — 3225 (Somerset East): 7 km from Somerset East to
Pearston (-CB), Spies 1131.
Cymbopogon prolixus (Stapf) Phill. : n = 20.
TRANSVAAL. — 2530 (Lydenburg): 6 km from Goede Hoop to
Roossenekal (-AA), Spies 1494.
Hyparrhenia dregeana (Nees) Stapf: n = 10.
TRANSVAAL. — 2529 (Witbank): 67 km from Lydenburg to Roos-
senekal (-BB), Spies 1634.
Paniceae
Digitaria diagonalis (Nees) Stapf var. diagonalis : n =
18.
CAPE. — 3228 (Butterworth): near Sunrise-On-Sea (-CC), Spies
1663.
Digitaria eriantha Steud.: n = 18.
TRANSVAAL. — 2430 (Pilgrim’s Rest): 23 km from Boshoek to
Olifantshoek (-CD), Spies 1544.
Digitaria monodactyla (Nees) Stapf: n = 9, 18.
TRANSVAAL. — 2530 (Lydenburg): 6 km from Goede Hoop to
Roossenekal (-AA), Spies 1492 (n = 18); 41 km from Goede Hoop to
Roossenekal (-AA), Spies 1592 (n = 9), 1597 (n = 18).
Digitaria natalensis Stent: n = 9.
CAPE. — 3228 (Butterworth): near Cintsa-West turnoff on road from
East London to Butterworth (-CC), Spies 1676.
Paspalum dilatatum Poir.: n = 20, 25.
TRANSVAAL. — 2530 (Lydenburg): 31 km from Lydenburg to
Roossenekal (-AB), Spies 1611 (n = 20).
CAPE. — 3225 (Somerset East): Daggaboersnek Pass (-DB), Spies
1110 (n = 20). 3227 (Stutterheim): Kabusie Forest (-CB), Spies 1698
(n = 25). 3228 (Butterworth): near Sunrise-On-Sea (-CC), Spies 1667
(n = 20).
Paspalum urvillei Steud.: n = 20.
TRANSVAAL. — 2530 (Lydenburg): 31 km from Lydenburg to
Roossenekal (-AB), Spies 1612.
Paspalum sp. : n = 20.
TRANSVAAL. — 2529 (Witbank): 15 km from Stoffberg to Belfast
(-BD), Spies 1444a.
Brachiaria subulifolia (Mez) Clayton: n = 18.
TRANSVAAL. — 2430 (Pilgrim’s Rest): Mac-Mac Waterfalls
(-DD), Spies 1433.
Setaria sphacelata (Schumach.) Moss var. sericea
(Stapf) Clayton: n = 18.
CAPE. — 3228 (Butterworth): near Cintsa-West turnoff on road from
East London to Butterworth (-CC), Spies 1673.
Pennisetum macrourum Trin.: n = 7, ~60.
TRANSVAAL. — 2530 (Lydenburg): Frischgewaagd Farm near
Dullstroom (-AC), Spies 1570 (n = —60); Goede Hoop Farm near
Lydenburg (-AC), Spies 1579 (n = 7 + 0-4B).
Pennisetum thunbergii Kunth: n = 9.
TRANSVAAL. — 2530 (Lydenburg): 15 km from Dullstroom to
Goede Hoop (-AC), Spies 1459.
Cenchrus ciliaris L.: n = 29/2.
CAPE. — 3325 (Somerset East): 51 km from Port Elizabeth to Jan-
senville (-AC), Spies 1650.
Rhynchelytrum nerviglume (Franch.) Chiov.: n = 18,
36.
TRANSVAAL. — 2530 (Lydenburg): 6 km from Goede Hoop to
Roossenekal (-AA), Spies 1487 (n = 18), Spies 1490 (n = 36).
Rhynchelytrum repens (Willd.) C. E. Hubb.: n = 18.
TRANSVAAL. — 2530 (Lydenburg): Goede Hoop Farm near
Lydenburg (-AC), Spies 1591 .
132
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
133
Stipeae
Stipa dregeana Steud. var. elongata (Nees) Stapf: n =
24.
CAPE. — 3227 (Stutterheim): Kabusie Forest (-CB), Spies 1693.
DISCUSSION
The chromosome numbers presented in this article
conform in most instances to published results for the
same species, or for other species of the genus (Darling-
ton & Wylie 1955; Omduff 1967-1969; Fedorov 1969;
Moore, R. J. 1970-1977; Moore, D. M. 1982; Goldblatt
1981 & 1984).
Deviations from the expected chromosome numbers
were observed in two different specimens. The somatic
chromosome number of 2n = 40 given for Sorghum
bicolor subsp. arundinaceum (Spies 1637) deviates from
the expected somatic number of 20 described by Celarier
(1958 & 1959), Harlan & De Wet (1972), De Wet
(1978) and Spies (1980). The other exception is Cen-
chrus ciliaris (Spies 1650) where a somatic chromosome
number of 29 clearly indicates the aneuploid nature of
the specimen.
Meiotic chromosome pairing was abnormal in a signi-
ficant number of the specimens studied. Abnormalities
were observed in the following species:
1, Arundinella nepalensis (Spies 1615): this supposed
diploid plant exhibited a rather abnormal meiosis with up
to three laggards during anaphase I (Figure la-c);
2, Tristachya leucothrix (Spies 1433a): one trivalent
and one univalent were observed in one cell of this speci-
men;
3, Hyparrhenia dregeana (Spies 1634): meiotic chro-
mosome analysis of this presumed diploid specimen in-
dicated that chromosome configurations varied from 10,
5„ to 5IV, with 6„ 2W the most common form (Figure Id).
This unexpected multivalent formation in a supposed
diploid specimen seems to indicate that this species has a
basic chromosome number of five rather than a basic
number of ten and the plant is, therefore, tetraploid and
not diploid;
4, Digitaria monodactyla (Spies 1592): two univalents
per cell were observed in two cells of this diploid speci-
men (Figure le);
5, Paspalum dilatatum: all specimens indicated abnor-
mal meiotic chromosome behaviour. In Spies 1110 uni-
valents were observed during metaphase I and up to nine
laggards were present during anaphase I. Another tetra-
ploid specimen, Spies 1611, also had abnormal chromo-
some pairing resulting in univalents during metaphase I,
as well as anaphase I laggards, resulting in an unequal
segregation of chromosomes. A third specimen, Spies
1667, exhibited an unsynchronized chromosome segre-
gation during anaphase I (the chromosomes in one part
of the metaphase plate had already segregated to the
polar region before segregation started in another part of
the metaphase plate), as well as a number (up to five) of
chromosome bridges during anaphase I. The pentaploid
specimen, Spies 1698 (Figure 2a & b), had 8-14 lag-
gards during anaphase I and a large number of micronu-
clei were observed in cells which were in the telophase I
stage;
6, Paspalum urvillei (Spies 1612): univalents were
observed in some of the cells studied (Figure 2c & d);
FIGURE 2. — Meiotic cells: a & b, Paspalum dilatatum, Spies 1698; c & d, Paspalum urvillei, Spies 1612. a & b, metaphase I showing
univalents (U); c & d, metaphase I showing univalents (U). Scale: x 2900.
134
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
FIGURE 3. — Diakinesis in Pennise-
tum macrourum, Spies 1579'. a,
seven bivalents; b & c, nine
bivalents; d, eight bivalents.
Scale: x 2900.
7, Paspalum sp. (Spies 1444a): in contrast to the other
specimens of this genus, this one was relatively normal.
Only one abnormal anaphase I cell with seven laggards
was observed;
8, Cenchrus ciliaris (Spies 1650): this aneuploid spe-
cimen had from one to seven univalents during meta-
phase I. No chromosome laggards were observed during
anaphase I. The somatic chromosome number of 29 may
imply chromosome loss in a tetraploid specimen, hence
the univalents. However, further investigation is
necessary before such a conclusion can be reached;
9, Stipa dregeana (Spies 1693): up to five chromo-
some bridges were observed during anaphase I.
Apart from the meiotic abnormalities observed during
this study, the possible occurrence of B-chromosomes
obscured the easy interpretation of some results. In one
Pennisetum macrourum specimen, Spies 1579, 37,5 %
of the cells studied had seven bivalents, 33,3 % had eight
bivalents and 29,2 % had nine bivalents (Figure 3).
Since the chromosomes in all cells were well stained and
good spreading was obtained, it was impossible to con-
fuse a bivalent with a univalent. Our only explanation for
this phenomenon is that this P. macrourum specimen
had 14 somatic chromosomes that form 7 bivalents dur-
ing meiosis and that 0-4 B-chromosomes, which mimic
euchromosome meiotic behaviour, were present.
REFERENCES
CELARIER, R. P. 1958. Cytotaxonomy of the Andropogoneae. III.
Subtribe Sorgheae, genus Sorghum. Cytologia 23: 395-418.
CELARIER, R. P. 1959. Cytotaxonomy of the Andropogoneae. IV.
Subtribe Sorgheae. Cytologia 24: 285-303.
DARLINGTON, C. D. & WYLIE, A. P. 1955. Chromosome atlas of
flowering plants. Allen & Unwin, London.
DE WET, J. M. I. 1978. Systematics and evolution of Sorghum sect.
Sorghum (Gramineae). American Journal of Botany 65: All-AM.
FEDOROV, A. A. 1969. Chromosome numbers of flowering plants.
Academy of Science, Leningrad.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1981. Index to plant chromosome numbers
1975-1979. Monograms of Systematic Botany 5: 1-553.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1984. Index to plant chromosome numbers
1979-1981. Monograms of Systematic Botany 8: 1-427.
HARLAN, I. R. & DE WET, I. M. J. 1972. A simplified classifica-
tion of cultivated Sorghum. Crop Science 12: 172-176.
MOORE, D. M. 1982. Flora Europaea— checklist and chromosome
index. University Press, Cambridge.
MOORE, R. J. 1970-1977. Index to plant chromosome numbers for
1968-1974. Regnum Vegetabile 68; 77; 84; 91 ; 96.
MOORE, R. J. 1973. Index to plant chromosome numbers for
1967-1971. Oosthoek Uitgevers, Utrecht.
ORNDUFF, R. 1967-1969. Index to plant chromosome numbers for
1965-1967. Regnum Vegetabile 50; 55; 59.
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
135
SPIES, J. J. 1980. Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench: ' n sitotaksonomiese
ondersoek. M.Sc. thesis, Department of Genetics, University of
the Orange Free State.
SPIES, J. J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1986a. Chromosome studies on
African plants. 1. Bothalia 16: 87-88.
SPIES, J. J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1986b. Chromosome studies on
African plants. 2. Bothalia 16: 269-270.
J. J. SPIES* and H. DU PLESSIS*
* Botanical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and Water
Supply , Private Bag X 1 0 1 , Pretoria 000 1 , RS A .
CHROMOSOME STUDIES ON AFRICAN PLANTS. 4.
The presentation of chromosome numbers in this
report conforms with the format described in the first
publications of this series (Spies & Du Plessis 1986 a &
b).
POACEAE
Aristideae
Aristida conge sta Roem. & Schult. subsp. congests.
n = 22.
TRANSVAAL. — 2530 (Lydenburg): 14 km from Boshoek to Diep-
geset (-AC), Spies 1537.
Eragrostideae
Eragrostis barbinodis Hack.: n = 25.
TRANSVAAL. — 2528 (Pretoria): 35 km from Warmbaths to Preto-
ria (-AB), Spies 2046.
Eragrostis curvula (Schrad.) Nees: n = 20, 30, 40.
TRANSVAAL. — 2430 (Pilgrim’s Rest): 18 km from turnoff on
Lydenburg-Ohrigstad road to Pilgrim’s Rest (-DC), Spies 1557 (n =
40), 1559 (n = 20). 2530 (Lydenburg): 10 km from Boshoek to Buf-
felsvlei (-AC), Spies 1526 (n = 30).
CAPE. — 3224 (Graaff-Reinet): 23 km from Pearston to Graaff-Rei-
net (-BD), Spies 1139 (n = 20).
Eragrostis lehmanniana Nees: n = 20, 30.
CAPE. — 3224 (Graaff-Reinet): 2 km from Jansenville to Kirkwood
(-DD), Spies 1099 (n = 20). 3225 (Somerset East): 35 km from
Somerset East to Pearston (-CA), Spies 1135 (n = 20). 3325 (Port
Elizabeth): 1 km from Lake Mentz to Waterford (-AA), Spies 1083
(n = 30), 1094 (n = 20).
Eragrostis plana Nees: n = 10.
TRANSVAAL. — 2530 (Lydenburg): 1 1 km from Goede Hoop to
Lydenburg (-AB), Spies 1506.
CAPE. — 3227 (Stutterheim): Kabusi Forest (-CB), Spies 1697.
Eragrostis planiculmis Nees: n = 21.
TRANSVAAL. — 2530 (Lydenburg): 31 km from Lydenburg to
Roossenekal (-AB), Spies 1620.
Eragrostis superba Peyr.: n = 20, 40.
TRANSVAAL. — 2529 fWitbank): 67 km from Lydenburg to Roos-
senekal (-BB), Spies 1625 (n = 40).
O.F.S. — 2925 (Jagersfontein): near Perdeberg (-AA), Spies 2003
(n = 20).
Eragrostis trichophora Coss. & Dur.: n = 30.
TRANSVAAL. — 2528 (Pretoria): near Sphinx Station (-CA), Spies
2031.
Pogonarthria squarrosa (Roem. & Schult.) Pilg. : n =
40.
TRANSVAAL. — 2528 (Pretoria): near Sphinx Station (-CA), Spies
2020.
Sporobolus africanus (Poir.) Robyns & Toumay: n =
30.
CAPE. — 3225 (Somerset East): 7 km from Somerset East to
Pearston (-CB), Spies 1129. 3228 (Butterworth): near Sunrise-On-Sea
(-CC), Spies 1659.
Sporobolus pectinatus Hack.: n = 20.
TRANSVAAL.— 2530 (Lydenburg): 13 km from Boshoek to Buf-
felsvlei (-AC), Spies 1530.
Cynodonteae
Chloris gayana Kunth: n = 10.
CAPE. — 3228 (Butterworth): near Sunrise-On-Sea (-CC), Spies
1660.
Chloris virgata Swartz: n = 10.
TRANSVAAL. — 2528 (Pretoria): near Sphinx Station (-CA), Spies
2021.
O.F.S. — 2925 (Jagersfontein): near Perdeberg (-AA), Spies 2005.
DISCUSSION
These chromosome numbers conform, in most in-
stances, with the numbers for either the species itself or
for other species in the same genus, given in the chromo-
some atlasses of Darlington & Wylie (1955), Omduff
(1967-1969), Fedorov (1969), Moore, R. J. (1970—
1977), Moore, D. M. (1982) and Goldblatt (1981 &
1984). The only exception was Eragrostis planiculmis
with 2n = 42 instead of a multiple of 10 expected in the
Eragrostideae. Since 21 bivalents were observed in every
cell studied, it is concluded that this specimen, Spies
1620, represents an aneuploid form of E. planiculmis
with 2n = 4x + 2 = 42.
Meiotic chromosome pairing was normal in most
specimens studied.
Two univalents were observed in every cell of a
diploid Eragrostis plana specimen, Spies 1506. This
asynapsis of a chromosome pair may perhaps be attri-
buted to hybridization.
REFERENCES
DARLINGTON, C. D. & WYLIE, A. P. 1955. Chromosome atlas of
flowering plants. Allen & Unwin, London.
FEDOROV, A. A. 1969. Chromosome numbers of flowering plants.
Academy of Science, Leningrad.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1981. Index to plant chromosome numbers 1975-
1978. Monograms of Systematic Botany 5: 1-553.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1984. Index to plant chromosome numbers
1979-1981 . Monograms of Systematic Botany 8: 1^427.
136
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
MOORE, D. M. 1982. Flora Europaea — checklist and chromosome
index. University Press, Cambridge.
MOORE, R. J. 1970-1977. Index to plant chromosome numbers for
1968-1974. Regnum Vegetabile 68; 77; 84; 91; 96.
MOORE, R. J. 1973. Index to plant chromosome numbers for
1967-1971. Oosthoek Uitgevers, Utrecht.
ORNDUFF, R. 1967-1969. Index to plant chromosome numbers for
1965-1967. Regnum Vegetabile 50; 55; 59.
SPIES, J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1986a. Chromosome studies on African
plants. 1. Bothalia 16: 87-88.
SPIES, J. J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1986b. Chromosome studies on
African plants. 2. Bothalia 16: 269-270.
J. J. SPIES* and A. JONKER*
* Botanical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and Water
Supply, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001, RSA.
PERFORMANCE OF A LABORATORY-CONSTRUCTED ANEMOMETER UNDER SUMMER FIELD CONDITIONS
ON A MOUNTAIN FYNBOS EXPERIMENTAL SITE
The consumer-oriented electronics industry has deve-
loped extremely rapidly over the past decade and has
provided many beneficial side-effects for experimental
scientists. A development of particular interest to en-
vironmental researchers is the advent of a new genera-
tion of relatively inexpensive solid-state data- loggers.
This type of apparatus, which uses the same technology
as that of the popular digital microprocessor industry,
makes continuous monitoring of environmental para-
meters at remote sites feasible for even modestly funded
studies. The analogue sensors needed to provide the log-
ging device with input information, however, do not
usually arise from similar high- volume production lines,
and very often constitute the most costly part of any data
monitoring system. This article intends to illustrate the
idea that inexpensive, laboratory-constructed transducers
can play an important role in optimizing the potential
benefits of modem data-logging equipment.
During 1985, an experimental study plot was esta-
blished in an area of natural mountain fynbos at an alti-
tude of 375 m in the Highlands State Forest Reserve in
the south-western Cape, on a site which had been cleared
by burning in February of that year. Since the wind,
especially the forceful summer ‘south-easter’, is a domi-
nant feature of the regional climate, and one to which the
vegetation is probably adapted in many respects (see
Boucher 1972), it was decided to dedicate one channel of
an on-site logger to measuring wind-speed at the site.
The most economical and convenient means of achieving
this was to construct a three-cup anemometer similar to
that described by Unwin (1980), but using a small 3
VDC electric motor as a voltage generator in place of an
electronic pulse counter. Investment in the instrument
comprised less than R15,00 in component parts and
approximately one working-day for assembly and cali-
bration, whereas the cost of an imported commercial
anemometer of similar design (Didcot DWR/201G) was
cited as more than R2 000,00 at the time of writing.
The cup wheel was constructed from half table tennis
balls, 2 mm brazing rod, microjet irrigation fittings, and
epoxy resin (see Figure 4). Output from this generator
was adjusted via a half-bridge resistance circuit to pro-
vide the logger with a signal in the correct range of 0 to
2 000 mVDC. Although it is reported (Woodward &
Sheehy 1983) that anemometers using this principle of
signal generation have a relatively high detection thresh-
old (up to 2 m.s'1), this shortcoming was not considered
a hindrance to the measurement of maxima, and the
approximation of mean windspeeds for the expected sea-
sonal windy conditions. The length of the arm (47 mm)
relative to the cup radius (17 mm) was close to the ratio
of 2,5 recognized as a reasonable compromise between
sensitivity and linear response (see Grace 1977). In the
field, the device was mounted with the cups 1,5 m above
the ground.
FIGURE 4. — Construction of the D.C. generator anemometer. Com-
ponent parts were assembled as indicated in the above sketch,
with slow-setting epoxy resin as a joining and sealing medium.
The parts labelled are: i, microjet irrigation couplers; 2, half table
tennis ball; 3, brazing rod; 4, plastic vial lid; 5, electric motor; 6,
plastic film cannister; and 7, electric leads to monitoring circuitry.
Scale is provided by the table tennis ball which has a diameter of
34 mm.
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
137
The instrument was calibrated on a windless day by
mounting it 0,5 m above the roof of a car, and driving at
constant speeds between 20 and 80 km.h"1 (5,6 and 22,2
m.s'1) while measuring the output on a digital voltmeter
(Fluke, model 73). Accuracy (± 5 %) of the car’s speed-
ometer was checked within the calibration range by tim-
ing displacement over measured distances. Further com-
parisons were made in situ in the field with an adjacently
mounted totalizing anemometer (S.I.A.P., model 1220)
over 30-minute periods on a windy day (Figure 5). This
latter set of measurements implied a reliable detection
threshold of approximately 2 m.s'1.
During the measurement period (November 15, 1985
to March 13, 1986), output from the anemometer was
measured once per minute, and processed by inbuilt
data-logger software to provide a mean windspeed value
for every three-hour interval, as well as the maximum
single value recorded during each day. Information is
summarized in Figures 6 & 7 for the full period, a time
of year when the south-east wind is common. From
Figure 6 it can be seen that on only one day during the
trial period did air movement remain below the reliable
detection threshold for the full 24-hour period, while an
overall maximum windspeed of 16,1 m.s'1 was recorded
on November 18. The three-hour mean values have been
combined for the whole measurement period, and plotted
in Figure 7 to indicate the diurnal pattern of air move-
ment. The site may not be subject to the full force of the
south-easter, as it is approximately 75 to 125 m lower
than a ridge two kilometres distant to the south and
south-east. Records of windspeed at D. F. Malan Airport
indicate that gusts of 28 m.s' may be experienced on the
Cape Flats between November and March (Weather
Bureau 1960).
AIR MOVEMENT (ms-')
FIGURE 5. — Calibration of the D.C. generator anemometer. The solid
line (Y = 8.121X - 8.895; r2 = 0.9997) represents in part the
calibration of the device against a car speedometer for five values
between 5,6 and 22,2 m.s1 (values beyond 8 m.s-1 are not
shown). Solid points compare mean output to mean windspeed as
measured at the study site by an adjacently mounted totalizing
anemometer over 30-minute periods.
Although a quantitative measurement of accuracy has
not been made on the instrument, both the linearity of the
calibration and the favourable comparison with a com-
mercial anemometer suggest that the recorded measure-
ments of air movement at the study site are accurate
within the limits outlined above. Other more sensitive
devices of sophisticated design for windspeed measure-
Vi
£
o
z
£
<
o
X
<
JULIAN DAY (1985/1986)
FIGURE 6. — Maximum daily windspeeds measured at the Highlands
study-site. The gap starting at day 49 (Feb. 18, 1986) indicates a
period of missing data owing to a problem with programmable
memory space in the recording device.
ment (see Rosenberg 1974) can be constructed for inter-
facing with a data-logger. Practical designs for transduc-
ers to measure other environmental parameters are also
readily available from the literature — see Chapter 8 of
Woodward & Sheehy (1983) for a useful list of refer-
ences. Apart from their benefit as instruments of oppor-
tunistic data capture, relatively cheap laboratory-con-
structed transducers can be left unattended with less
anxiety at remote stations where pervasive human van-
dalism is frequently a threat.
ci
t/i
O0
o
£
z
<
1x1
FIGURE 7. — Diurnal pattern of air movement at the Highlands study-
site. The histogram above shows the ratio of days in the mea-
surement period when the mean measured wind-speed during the
relevant time interval was above 2 m.s'1. Below is the overall
mean windspeed, including calms, for each time interval (solid
line), and the associated standard deviation of each (broken line).
138
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
REFERENCES
BOUCHER, C. 1972. The vegetation of the Cape Hangklip area.
M.Sc. thesis, University of Cape Town.
GRACE, J. 1977. Plant response to wind. Academic Press, London.
ROSENBERG, N. J. 1974. Microclimate: the biological environment.
Wiley, New York.
UNWIN, D. M. 1980. Microclimate measurement for ecologists. Aca-
demic Press, London.
WEATHER BUREAU 1960. Climate of South Africa . Part 6: surface
winds. WB 26. Weather Bureau, Pretoria.
WOODWARD, F. I. & SHEEHY, J. E. 1983. Principles and mea-
surements in environmental biology. Butterworth, London.
G. W. DAVIS
Bothalia 17,1: 139-153(1987)
REVIEW OF THE WORK OF THE BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE, 1985/86
1st April 1985-3 1st March 1986
CONTENTS
Introduction 139
Reports of divisions 139
Staff list 148
Publications by the staff 151
INTRODUCTION
Good progress has been made with research and the
publications of the Institute reflect this very clearly.
Nevertheless, there is a steady erosion of available
research funds due to minimal growth and continuing in-
flation. The unfilled research posts now constitute nearly
11 % of the total, a situation which may be partially
responsible for a drop in the total number of individual
research papers published this year. The production of
journals has, however, remained very stable and the
publication of two Memoirs, one volume of Palaeo-
flora, one volume and two parts of volumes of the Flora
of southern Africa is remarkable progress under present
circumstances.
The increasing demand for botanical information and
plant identifications is reflected in the 28 000 plant iden-
tifications done last year. This has, however, meant that
most of the professional staff in the herbaria have not had
any time for research, a situation which is severely
affecting their careers. In spite of an increase in demand
for plant identifications of approximately 100 % over a
period of 20 years which has been met by increasing
efficiency, the herbarium staff complement has not been
expanded for 20 years and an intolerable situation has
arisen where demands can no longer be met effectively.
The initiatives being taken in connection with pasture
research have opened new perspectives also in botanical
research. These are now being actively pursued.
HERBARIUM DIVISION
Due to serious understaffing problems, the four her-
baria of the Institute are finding it increasingly difficult
to cope with the existing workload. This is affecting all
three of the major areas of performance, namely, cura-
tion, research and information services. This has resulted
largely because the staff complement has remained static
for more than 20 years while, in the last seven years
alone, the workload has increased by over 220 %.
Figures for the National Herbarium show that during this
period the number of revisions incorporated each year
has increased by 348 %, exchanges with other herbaria
by 330 %, accessions by 57 %, identifications by 40 %,
registered projects by 400 % and the maintenance and
updating of PRECIS by over 300 %. Every effort is
being made to try and deal with the problems being
experienced.
National Herbarium, Pretoria (PRE)
Curation
Approximately 140 scientific journals were scanned
for taxonomic and nomenclature! changes covering the
FSA-region. Statistics available for the monocotyledon
families show that during the year 530 new names were
adopted, extracted from 41 publications. Of these, 111
were new species.
The updating of the PRECIS databank continued with
± 7 400 specimens having undergone name changes and
1 8 400 specimens having had their grid references added
or corrected. Other miscellaneous changes affected
3 620 specimens.
Distribution records were significantly extended for
63 taxa, mostly at the provincial level. These included a
number of new records for southern Africa largely in-
volving the mosses and lichens.
Computerization
A multi-user Burroughs computer was purchased.
This will be used in the herbarium as a management,
curatorial and research tool and should significantly
boost efficiency and productivity. Mr T. H. Arnold is
currently designing various applications to improve the
handling of plant identifications, loans and exchanges as
well as the printing of specimen labels. It is also planned
to use the computer to selectively regulate specimen
accessions into the herbarium. This new computer will
be directly linked by modem to the B7900 mainframe
housing the PRECIS databank.
Accommodation
Electrification of the north side of the herbarium
wings is complete. No progress has been made with the
installation of three additional working bays on the south
side of each wing. Plans have been submitted for a new
SEM room and for a two-room prefab building in the
eastern courtyard to house the four new plant driers and
the deep-freezers used to decontaminate specimens. No
new herbarium cabinets were purchased. Fire protec-
tion and insect proofing of the herbarium is due to
start towards the end of 1986. Alterations costing
± R1 000 000 will take place over a 8-10 month period
and will seriously affect all activities in the herbarium.
140
Collecting expeditions
These include trips to Zululand (general collecting and
Poaceae), south-east OFS and northern Cape (Poaceae,
general collecting and Bryophyta), Natal (Vigna),
eastern Transvaal ( Transvaal wild flowers facet), Natal
Drakensberg and southern Cape (lichens).
Research and related activities
The family Polygonaceae (G. Germishuizen). The gen-
era Polygonum, Bilderdykia and Reynoutria have been
written up in FSA format and submitted to the editor.
Revisions of Oxygonum and Rumex are progressing well
with two new Oxygonum taxa having been prepared for
publication.
Revision of Riccia (Hepaticae) (S. M. Perold). This
facet is nearing completion. Seven papers were prepared
and submitted for publication. These include six new
species as well as a new section and subgenus.
Revision of Vigna (Fabaceae) (B. J. Pienaar). SEM
studies of leaf surfaces produced no significant charac-
ters of taxonomic value. Two distinct groups were recog-
nized based on keel orientation. The structure and loca-
tion of glands was also useful in the grouping of taxa.
Revision of Carex (Cyperaceae) (C. Reid). Work on this
genus was recently started and to date has been confined
to a study of PRE material. A number of problem taxa
have been identified as well as four possibly new spe-
cies.
Contributions to the moss flora (J. van Rooy). Work on
the family Bryaceae for the 2nd fascicle of Bryophyta of
the Flora of southern Africa was completed. As soon as
all the illustrations have been prepared, this fascicle will
be submitted for publication. A revision of the family
Orthotrichaceae (6 genera, 27 species) was started for
the 3rd fascicle.
Transvaal wild flowers. Vol. 2 (G. Germishuizen).
Eighty species (13 % of total) have been illustrated by
the artist Mrs A. Fabian. The text for half of these has
been prepared.
Plant species and synonym list (various contributors).
Work on Part 2 of the second edition was completed.
This covers all dicotyledon families. The manuscript is
awaiting checking before being submitted for publica-
tion.
Research support
Scanning electron microscope (S. M. Perold). 1968
micrographs were prepared for various BRI and outside
workers. These include — Ehrharta leaf surfaces, lem-
mas of Paniceae and Digitaria, Cucurbitaceae fruit and
seed surfaces, lichen thalli, Vigna inflorescence and leaf
surfaces, fossil leaf cuticles, Riccia spores and thalli,
fern spores and Euphorbia leaf and seed surfaces.
Dr H. F. Glen also continued his investigation of Aloe
leaf surfaces.
Determination of priority collecting areas (various con-
tributors). The number of species and specimens per 14
degree square was extracted from the PRECIS databank
and used to plot species and specimen frequency distri-
bution maps for southern Africa. A number of fairly well
defined areas, which are poorly represented by collec-
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
tions in the National Herbarium, were identified from the
maps.
Based on this information, expeditions were under-
taken to fifteen 14 degree squares in three of the areas (in
Natal, south-east OFS and central Cape) to test the extent
to which intensive collecting could improve the repre-
sentation of taxa in the PRE Herbarium. In 14 of the 15
squares the holdings were increased significantly (from
3,2- to more than 10-fold).
Special collecting vehicle (M. D. Panagos). A Nissan
Ekonovan is being fitted as a special collecting vehicle.
A two-way radio has been purchased and a special roof-
rack designed and fitted to carry 12 plant presses. The
roofrack will facilitate rapid drying of plant material
while the vehicle is moving. A roll-up awning has been
fitted to shelter workers during unfavourable weather.
Fitting of the interior of the vehicle is still at the design
stage. Figure 1.
FIGURE 1. — A Nissan Ekovan which has been fitted for collecting.
The roofrack carries 12 plant presses. The roll-up awning shelters
workers during unfavourable weather.
Collecting Poaceae for the National Herbarium (L.
Fish). A single collecting trip was undertaken to poorly
represented areas of the OFS and north-eastern Cape.
lo9 specimens representing 156 species were collected.
For both species and specimens, representation in the
PRE herbarium was increased significantly (more than
15-fold) for four of the five /4 degree squares sampled.
Over 800 duplicates were collected for distribution to
herbaria worldwide.
Expansion of the fruit and seed collection (E. Retief).
This has been contributed to largely by material collected
during fieldwork for other facets. The fruit collection
was extended by 392 to 4 335 collections. The seed col-
lection was extended by 591 to 4 003 collections.
Publications. Fourteen articles appeared in various local
as well as overseas publications (see Publications by the
staff). A further 32 articles are in press. The plant names
in Acocks’s Veld types of South Africa were updated by
Mrs E. van Hoepen in preparation for the publication of
the next edition of this work.
Contributions to outside publications. Various members
of the division contributed to the Ciba Geigy book Weeds
of crops and gardens in southern Africa (published
1985) and to the Auriol Batten book Flowers of southern
Africa by checking the texts.
Plant identification services. 16 248 specimens were
identified for officers of the Institute, various State
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
141
Departments and Provincial Administrations, univer-
sities and neighbouring states. In addition, identifica-
tions for visitors numbered 925. Enquiries received by
telephone totalled 1 136. New accessions to the her-
barium numbered 20 779. Because of a shortage of
typists, the backlog with the typing of specimen labels
remains at 12 months.
Loans and exchanges. 67 loans (comprising 7 164 speci-
mens) were sent out and 45 loans (2 910 specimens)
returned. The total number of outstanding loans is 288
(35 069 specimens).
Natal Herbarium, Durban (NH)
With Mr B. D. Schrire transferred to the Royal
Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, as the South African
Liaison Officer, Mrs M. Jordaan was appointed as cura-
tor of the herbarium and officer in charge of the unit.
Besides administering the unit, she also continued to be
responsible for the bulk of identifications received, as-
sisted by Mr A. M. Ngwenya and Mr C. N. Buthelezi.
During this period, it was possible to maintain a good
service record despite the serious manpower shortage.
This includes 4 606 plant identifications, assisting 409
visitors, handling 729 telephone enquiries, dispatching
1 272 specimens out on loan and accessioning 2 765
specimens.
Considerable time was spent sorting and refining taxa
in the herbarium and a start was made to remove speci-
mens of western Cape taxa. To date, 370 monocotyledon
specimens have been sent to the National Herbarium and
233 to the Stellenbosch Herbarium. When time per-
mitted, studies in the Celastraceae and Cussonia were
continued.
Plans were submitted to have the poorly utilized room
adjacent to the herbarium insect-proofed and converted
into a mounting and parcelling room.
Government Herbarium, Grahamstown (GRA)
The staff are now well settled into their new quarters
with all activities functioning normally.
There has been an overall increase in services with.
3 241 plant specimens identified, assistance given to
1 109 visitors, 494 telephone enquiries dealt with and 13
loans (1 185 specimens) sent out.
A special effort was made to improve the quality of
the collections by scanning through covers, renaming
misidentified specimens and generally sorting taxa into
more homogeneous groups. Some 253 genera were
examined and the names of 125 specimens updated.
Mrs Rei Hart was appointed to a part-time post,
funded by the Pocock bequest to the Albany Museum.
She will curate the Pocock Marine algae collection
which last received attention in 1969. To date, she has
systematically examined the green and brown algae and
has mounted, sorted and accessioned all the material in
74 genera.
Mr Neil Abrahams continued giving voluntary assist-
ance in the herbarium by helping with the labelling and
mounting of specimens.
The block clearing of alien plants on the Grahamstown
Nature Reserve remains an endless problem. This work
continued throughout the year with the reserve curator
assisted by the Herbarium Laboratory Assistant for a
period of five months. Despite this, the problem is still
not under control.
Government Herbarium, Stellenbosch (STE)
Mr R. O. Moffett took over from Mrs C. M. van Wyk
(who was transferred to PRE) as curator of the her-
barium.
A total of 2 995 specimens was identified, 312 visitors
were assisted, telephone enquiries numbered 332, acces-
sions into the herbarium totalled 4 810 and 904 speci-
mens were sent out on loan. Because of the staff shortage
and the identification backlog that existed, an additional
636 specimens were sent to PRE where they were identi-
fied by Mrs Van Wyk. The naming bacldog has been
greatly reduced.
Four collecting trips were undertaken to the following
areas — De Hoop, Sutherland, Barrydale (Langeberge)
and to the southern Karoo. A total of 755 collections was
made.
Mr Moffett continued with his study of the genus Rhus
which is now largely completed. A paper titled ‘A SEM
study of the leaf of Rhus species in southern Africa’ was
presented at the SAAB Congress in Umtata, Transkei.
FLORA RESEARCH DIVISION
Flora of southern Africa (FSA )
The FSA subproject has had impact outside the Insti-
tute in several ways. The Department provided extra
support through awarding a research contract to the Uni-
versity of Cape Town, for the Orchidaceae volume; fol-
lowing the untimely death of Prof. E. A. Schelpe, the
contract was taken up by Prof. A. V. Hall. The fourth
meeting of the FSA working group was held during the
Congress of the South African Association of Botanists
in January 1986. News of interest to FSA contributors
was circulated in Forum Botanicum, the newsletter of
SAAB.
Three Flora fascicles were published. Vol. 4,2 by Mrs
A. A. Obermeyer (Mauve), who has recently retired,
deals with the families Xyridaceae, Eriocaulaceae, Com-
melinaceae, Pontederiaceae and Juncaceae. The fascicle
covers 17 genera and 106 species in the five families.
Vol. 14 by H. R. Tolken, formerly of the BRI and now
at the herbarium in Adelaide, Australia, covers the
family Crassulaceae, with six genera and 215 species
(345 species and infraspecific taxa). Vol. 31,1,2 by C.
Puff covers the tribes Paederieae, Anthospermeae and
Rubieae in the Rubiaceae, comprising eight genera and
74 species. Dr Puff, of the Institute for Botany at the
University of Vienna, completed the research on a
fellowship from the Department.
The List of species of southern African plants, Edn 2,
Part 1, covering cryptogams, gymnosperms and mono-
cots was published, and Part 2, covering dicots, is nearly
complete. The List of species is a precursor to the FSA
that presents up-to-date coverage of all taxa at increasing
levels of approximation, and future editions will contain
additional information, such as distribution, conserva-
tion status and life form.
Institute staff members, and outside contributors on
contract made the following progress with research
facets for the FSA :
142
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
Lichens: Prof. O. Almbom of Lund, Sweden, has in-
creased the list of potential contributors to the lichen
volume to 33, and has made a formal division of the
work into fascicles.
Bryophyta: The genus Bryum was completed by Mr J.
van Rooy, and Fascicle 2, with Dr R. E. Magill of the
Missouri Botanical Garden as senior author, is almost
ready for the press.
Vol. 2: Poaceae — Oryzoideae, Centostecoideae and
Bambusoideae. The draft for Ehrharta was completed
by Dr G. E. Gibbs Russell, but a number of type
specimens must still be seen. All types have been
examined for Oryza, Leersia, Prosphytochloa and
Megastachya.
Vol. 4: Restionaceae. Dr H. P. Linder has been on leave
travelling and collecting plants in tropical Africa for a
year: therefore little work has been done. However, a
conspectus of 318 species, arranged according to his
own generic classification, was published in Bothalia
15, 3 &4 (1985).
Vol. 5: Liliaceae — Aloina e-Aloe. The FSA manuscript
for Aloe by Dr H. F. Glen and Mr D. S. Hardy is
nearing completion. Dr Glen has carried out an exten-
sive survey of leaf epidermal types using the scanning
electron microscope, assisted by Mrs S. Perold.
Vol. 8: Orchidaceae. Prof. A. V. Hall has taken over the
contract on the death of Prof. E. A. Schelpe. Thirteen
genera were completed by Mrs N. C. Anthony, who
resigned in July 1985. Of the remaining work to be
done, Mrs J. Stewart, of the Herbarium, Royal
Botanic Gardens, Kew, has agreed to contribute 23
genera, and Miss K. L. Immelman will contribute
Holothrix. Seventeen genera, comprising about 65
species, still require attention.
Vol. 9: Salicaceae, Fagaceae, Urticaceae and Pipera-
ceae. FSA manuscripts have been prepared for all
genera, and only a few type specimens are needed
before the work can be finalized. The work on Urtica-
ceae has been done in collaboration with Dr I. Friis of
the Botanical Museum and Herbarium, Copenhagen.
Vol. 11: Mesembryanthemaceae. A treatment of Astri-
dia, Acrodon and Ebracteola is in press in Bothalia.
Vol. 16: Fabaceae — Desmodieae. Mr B. D. Schrire’s
account of the tribe is being prepared for Bothalia.
The FSA fascicle of which it forms a part will not
appear until other genera have been completed.
Fabaceae — Millettieae. Mr Schrire has studied
generic limits between Mundulea and Tephrosia, and
has produced a conspectus of the species and species
complexes in Tephrosia subgenus Barbistyla, which
will be published in Bothalia to serve as an aid to
identification until the FSA treatment is complete.
Vol. 25: Ericaceae. Mr E. G. H. Oliver has continued
studies in the ‘minor genera’, concentrating on Sym-
pieza, Ericinella, Coilostigma, Blaeria and Anoma-
lanthus. Monographic treatments of Ericinella and
Coilostigma are in press in Bothalia, but future work
will be written in FSA format.
Vol. 30: Acanthaceae — Justicia. Miss Immelman’s
completed FSA manuscript is with the editor, and
awaits contributions from researchers from other insti-
tutions before the fascicle can be published.
Pretoria Flora
The text of Asclepiadaceae and Poaceae was com-
pleted, translated into Afrikaans and typeset except for
10 pages of the Afrikaans text of Poaceae. Some 60
species of Asteraceae were written up. They were keyed
out in nine major groups. Three preliminary lists were
compiled and put on word processor memory: 1 , a list of
scientific names in which families are alphabetically
arranged and in which genera are again alphabetically
arranged within their families; 2, a list in which families
are arranged in the sequence in which they appear in the
work, with taxa alphabetically arranged under then-
family; 3, a list of vernacular names.
Altogether 303 English and 275 Afrikaans pages have
now been typeset making a total of 578. Some 1 781
species have so far been dealt with.
Palaeoflora of southern Africa
The Prodromus of South African Megafloras, Devo-
nian to Lower Cretaceous, by Drs J. M. and H. M.
Anderson was published. It covers all plant fossils
known for southern Africa during the Pangaea period.
Eighteen different ‘floras’ dominated at different times,
and each flora is related to major geological events such
as glaciation. The Andersons are now preparing the
second in the Molteno Formation series, dealing with all
the gymnosperms except Dicroidium, which was
published in Volume 1 .
Liaison Officer, Kew
Mr B. D. Schrire assumed duty as the new Liaison
Officer. He has continued to provide information about
taxonomic and related subjects to researchers on the
southern African flora, and to pursue his research in
Fabaceae. He has developed a particular interest in taxon
databases, and is co-operating in the International
Legume Database as the person responsible for Indigo-
fereae.
DATA SUBDIVISION
The Subdivision co-ordinates the work of the Institute
on the Department’s Burroughs 7900 mainframe com-
puter. Two large systems maintained on this computer
are the taxonomic database PRECIS and the ecological
database PHYTOTAB. The Subdivision also maintains a
Hewlett-Packard 9845B microcomputer, which was
heavily used in the past. However, the present trend
towards personal computers in each Division has
lessened the use of the eight-year-old Hewlett-Packard.
PRECIS is managed by Mrs J. C. Mogford, and now
consists of four components. Specimen-PRECIS con-
tains herbarium specimen label data in 24 data fields for
615 000 specimens in PRE herbarium; taxon-PRECIS
contains recent useful literature, synonymy, status as
naturalized alien, and status of current taxonomic
research for the 24 000 plant taxa in southern Africa;
nomenclature-PRECIS has begun as a prototype for Poa-
ceae, to be developed further when staff is available; and
curatorial-PRECIS is to be developed on a Burroughs 25
microcomputer network to link information for speci-
men-PRECIS to the curatorial and administrative needs
of the Herbarium Division.
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
143
PHYTOTAB, managed by Mr M. D. Panagos, has
entered a phase of adding data from published ecological
surveys, and 37 such datasets are now in the system.
Fourteen additional datasets are being manipulated to
analyse data for current research facets, and three of
these are generating keys for vegetative identification of
plant species in the areas of the surveys. The keys are
designed for plants of the Waterberg, for grasses of the
Amersfoort area, and for plant families of South West
Africa/Namibia.
Smaller systems maintained on the Burroughs 7900
include the Garden Records system, developed by Mrs
B. C. de Wet for data about all the plants in the botanical
garden, and PHOTOS, developed by Miss A. P. Backer
to record data about photographic vegetation records for
the Vegetation Ecology Division.
BIOS YSTEM ATICS DIVISION
Pending further developments, this new Division,
with an effective staff of three, devoted itself largely to
the scientific and technical editing of the publications of
the Institute. Mrs E. P. du Plessis, who was recently
appointed, is doing all the translating into Afrikaans
required by the Institute, including that for Flowering
Plants of Africa and Pretoria Flora.
Bothalia
In future two separate numbers of this journal will be
published, one in the middle and one at the end of the
year. A new guide to authors was made available and
will be published in Vol. 16,1. It agrees essentially with
that of the South African Journal of Botany except for
certain aspects of specimen citation.
Vol. 15, 3 & 4 was published; 16,1 is in press and
16,2 and the index to Vol. 15 are at an advanced stage of
editing.
Flora of southern Africa (FSA)
One volume and two parts of volumes were published
(See Flora Research Division).
The following are in press: Pteridophyta and Vol. 18,3
with Simaroubaceae, Burseraceae, Ptaeroxylaceae,
Meliaceae and Malpighiaceae.
A new edition of the guide for authors was compiled.
Flowering Plants of Africa (FPA)
Vol. 48, 3 & 4 was published and 49, 1 & 2 is in
press.
Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa
All numbers of this series were produced in camera-
ready form. The following were published: No. 50 A
classification of the mountain vegetation of the Fynbos
Biome (B. M. Campbell); No. 51 List of species of
southern African plants. Edn 2. Part 1 (G. E. Gibbs
Russell et al.).
The following numbers are in press: No. 52 A plant
ecological bibliography and thesaurus for southern
Africa up to 1975 (A. P. Backer et al.)\ No. 53 A cata-
logue of problem plants in southern Africa incorporating
the National weed list of South Africa (M. J. Wells et
al.)‘, No. 54 Biomes of southern Africa — an objective
categorization (M. C. Rutherford & R. H. Westfall).
No. 55 Barrier plants of southern Africa (L. Hender-
son) is at an advanced stage of editing and a third edition
of Veld types of South Africa (J. P. H. Acocks) is in
preparation.
Palaeoflora of southern Africa
Prodromus of South African megafloras, Devonian to
Lower Cretaceous by J. M. & H. M. Anderson was
published by A. A. Balkema.
Flowers of southern Africa by Auriol Batten
Assistance was given with the editing and proof-read-
ing of this work which is scheduled to appear by the
middle of 1986.
PLANT STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION DIVISION
Dr J. J. Spies was awarded a Ph.D. degree for his
work on the cytogenetics of Lantana camara, a sophisti-
cated and detailed study with important practical impli-
cations. Mrs A. Marks left us during October and Miss
A. Jonker joined the cytogenetics team in January as a
Research Technician.
Comparative grass leaf anatomy
Dr R. P. Ellis attended the XI AETFAT meeting in St
Louis, Missouri, where he took part in a symposium on
modem systematic studies in African botany. His paper
dealt with the leaf anatomy and systematics of the Afri-
can grasses, with special attention being paid to the
genus Panicum. During the year attention was given to
the genus Ehrharta, which exhibits unusual anatomical
variation and appears to be in need of taxonomic
re-evaluation.
Cytogenetics of the Poaceae
Dr Spies and his team are making excellent progress
with the collection of material and 275 species from 1 15
genera have been transplanted to the Pretoria National
Botanical Garden. From each of these accessions, root
tips are collected for mitosis squashes, anthers for
meiosis squashes, young embryo sacs for developmental
studies and seed is fixed for studies of the embryo for-
mula. This work holds exciting prospects for the future.
VEGETATION ECOLOGY DIVISION
The function of the Vegetation Ecology Division is to
study the vegetation of South Africa and its ecological
relations. This work involves three main aspects: the
identification, description, classification and mapping of
the various kinds of vegetation; study of the ecological
relationships between different kinds of vegetation —
with one another and with the environment — and of the
various processes and mechanisms that determine the
behaviour of plant communities; and the application of
such ecological knowledge to the management and utili-
zation of vegetational resources.
Transvaal bushveld studies
The area designated for research on the vegetation
ecology of Sour Bushveld in the Transvaal Waterberg
144
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
was stratified by Mr R. H. Westfall for sampling
efficiency. A scale-related, vegetation-enhanced satel-
lite-imagery method was developed for this purpose and
should be of great interest for determining spatial
patterns of vegetation and environment. Predictive
expressions of species-area relation were established for
determining subsample size. The initial 14 releves
sampled substantiate the validity of both the species-area
expressions and the stratification.
Transvaal forest survey
The results of the study of the vegetation ecology and
environment in the Sabie area were successfully sub-
mitted by Mr G. B. Deall as an M.Sc. thesis. These
results together with follow-up work are being prepared
for publication.
Coastal studies
Manuscripts on the dune vegetation between Richards
Bay and the Mlalazi Lagoon and on the dry coastal
ecosystems of the east coast of South Africa were
finalized by Dr P. J. Weisser for publication. He has also
prepared a report on the vegetation of the Mzingazi Lake
for the CSIR, and has finalized detailed research plan-
ning for the study of the coastal-dune area between Kosi
Bay and Sodwana.
Mr M. G. O’ Callaghan has analysed vegetation data
from in and around the estuaries entering False Bay.
Three aquatic, semi-aquatic and 15 terrestrial com-
munities were recognized on the basis of floristics. A
structural analysis of the area yielded communities
which did not correlate with environmental parameters.
Temporal aerial photographic analysis showed that alien
vegetation, recreational, residential and industrial areas
have increased since 1936, whereas open sand and
natural vegetation have decreased. These data can be
used to guide management of the False Bay coast.
Cape fynbos studies
A semi-detailed regional ecological study of the western
lowland fynbos. Mr C. Boucher is finalizing the text of
the classification and description of the western coastal
lowland fynbos for publication. Final editing in respect
of, inter alia, the nomenclature of plant species is being
attended to. All the maps have been completed and
tables and photographs require finalizing for publication
quality.
The vegetation of the Cedarberg. Detailed facet pro-
posals for the ecological studies of the mountain fynbos
and other vegetation on the Cedarberg have been drawn
up and approved. Mr H. C. Taylor has concentrated his
fieldwork on the northern Cedarberg where nested
quadrats to determine optimum plot size indicate that a
quadrat size of 5 m x 10 m, with a surround of 1 ,5 m to
bring the total area to 100 m2, is sufficient for most
Cedarberg fynbos communities. Stratification of aerial
photographs in the northern sector revealed some four-
teen landscape units aligned along two distinct gradients,
north-south and east- west, suggesting that two transects
are needed in this sector.
The vegetation of the Langeberg. Mr D. J. McDonald’s
detailed facet proposals have been drawn up and
approved. Four transects for the sampling of the vegeta-
tion of the Langeberg have been selected. Fieldwork has
commenced on the transect through the Boesmansbos
Wilderness Area, Grootvadersbosch State Forest. To
date, 55 releves have been sampled in Mountain Fynbos
vegetation. A further 80-100 samples are envisaged to
complete sampling of this transect, which will include
releves in the remnant Afromontane forest communities.
Grassland studies
Detailed facet proposals have been drawn up for the
ecological study of the grassland vegetation of the
Amersfoort area of the eastern Transvaal Highveld by
Miss B. J. Turner. Field sampling has commenced with
the assistance of Mr J. F. van Blerk and Miss K. Longley
(Figure 2). An aid to the vegetative identification of
grasses in the Amersfoort area has been compiled to
assist in the identification of grasses not in flower.
FIGURE 2. — A technician investigating nested quadrats to determine
optimal quadrat size for vegetation sampling in the Amersfoort
area of the north-eastern Transvaal Highveld.
Ecological bibliography
The ‘Ecological bibliography and thesaurus for
southern Africa up to 1975’ by Miss A. P. Backer, Dr
D. J. B. Killick and Dr D. Edwards has now been com-
pleted. It will be published in the series Memoirs of the
Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 52. This memoir
aims to fulfil the need for a single publication containing
most references of an ecological nature.
Ecological data bank
Steady progress is being made with the accession,
storage and processing of vegetational and environ-
mental data for the inventory of vegetational resources.
Mrs B. J. Vermeulen is playing a key role. Data are
obtained for accession as hard copy in the form of unpro-
cessed field data or in variously processed forms includ-
ing published or unpublished papers, reports and maps.
The PHYTOTAB program package is used for the classi-
fication and ordination of data sets.
EXPERIMENTAL ECOLOGY DIVISION
The division, under Dr M. C. Rutherford, has con-
tinued to concentrate its research on the disturbance of
indigenous fynbos plants through alien plant competition
and by substrate disturbance while maintaining active
research on the water relations of Karoo plants. The
whole division has been centred in Cape Town to pro-
mote the effective study of these important aspects of the
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
145
Fynbos and Karoo biomes. This also places the division
in reasonable reach of examples of all the other biomes
of southern Africa determined by the relevant research
facet referred to below. Two facets on aquatic plant
ecology have been successfully completed and ter-
minated during the year following the appearance of se-
veral publications on these by Dr C. F. Musil.
Fynbos germination studies
Dr Musil’s results to date indicate that seeds of several
fynbos species show maximum germination under low
temperatures. This is an important finding in that it
suggests that germination is dependent on the cold, wet
winter months, irrespective of the season of seed shed-
ding. These and other findings of the germination
requirements and reproductive capacities of fynbos
plants are being compared with those for invasive alien
plant species.
Fynbos competition studies
Miss F. M. Pressinger has determined that the pre-
sence of lone Acacia saligna seedlings had no significant
effect on Protea repens seedlings when grown at close
proximity at densities up to 2 346 plants m 2 at this early
stage of development. This suggests that Acacia saligna
may affect Protea repens at more advanced stages of
development. The officer has also been able to predict
the pattern of seed dispersal of Acacia saligna in the field
and therefore the direction of spread of thickets of this
species.
Dr Rutherford has found that the main effect of heavy
infestations of alien plant species on the indigenous
vegetation of the western Cape lowlands is a function of,
at least, soil type, soil moisture, proximity to human
settlements, and an interaction between mean annual
rainfall and stock browsing pressure. Rhus laevigata
appears to tolerate the environment created by dense
Acacia saligna populations more effectively than many
other indigenous species and this and other related phe-
nomena are being further researched.
Fynbos transformation studies
Mr G. W. Davis’s work has shown that during the
summer following rotivation of burned mountain fynbos
land, reflectivity of the soil surface was increased and
higher soil moisture levels were maintained with lower-
ing of soil temperature. The treatment had no effect on
the shoot extension of introduced Protea cynaroides and
P. repens for this period but summer transpiration of P.
cynaroides was greater on the disturbed sites.
Simulation studies in fynbos
Preliminary simulation to predict pressures on natural
populations of fynbos ornamental plants by the wild
flower picking industry, has highlighted the problem of
peak flowering demand and peak supply being often out
of phase. A suitable model structure is currently being
developed to make predictions as realistic as possible.
Karoo research
Field research results obtained for Karoo plants by Mr
G. F. Midgley have raised important hypotheses that
relate reduction in leaf surface area, stomatal resistance
and transpiration rates, xylem pressure potentials and
root system morphologies to succulent and non-suc-
culent plant forms. These hypotheses are to be expanded
and tested in the next phase of the research.
Biome studies
The work on determination of biomes of southern
Africa by Dr Rutherford and Mr R. H. Westfall has been
concluded and is in press in the Memoirs of the Botanical
Survey of South Africa series.
PLANT EXPLORATION DIVISION
The division, under Mr M. J. Wells, concentrated its
attention on weeds and food plant research. Mr T. H.
Arnold has continued to lead the food plant research
team from his position as head of the Herbarium Divi-
sion.
Conservation of germ plasm
The following seed collected by Mr Arnold, was
included in the germ plasm bank: 569 collections of
Sorghum bicolor subsp. bicolor and 764 collections of
Pennisetum africanum. Primitive crop collections being
held for potential breeding purposes now total 3 371.
Despite the fact that we are splitting and distributing seed
collections to various seed banks, we are still concerned
about the long-term fate of this germ plasm.
Indigenous food plants
Mr A. A. Balsinhas added a further 80 species to the
national food plant data-bank, bringing the total of spe-
cies included to 1 589. Information was also added to the
records of many species already listed. Information
gathering by Miss S. E. Chadwick, on 14 priority food
plants, mainly members of the Cucurbitaceae continued,
with 30 more references being included. Observations on
the shelf life of fruits, and on associated fungi and in-
sects were included, as were soil analyses from areas
where they were growing. Although not always as tasty
as cultivated cucurbits, some of the indigenous species
have a longer shelf life, better nutritional characteristics
and greater ability to grow in arid, brackish soils.
Primitive crop plants of African origin
Much material of primitive cereal crops grown in the
Caprivi and Kavango was collected by Mr Arnold and
labelled and catalogued by Miss A. E. Swanepoel. These
regions proved to be extremely rich sources of primitive
cereal germ plasm. Kavango had a notably high occur-
rence of Durra sorghums which are Asian in origin and
rarely found elsewhere in southern Africa. The charac-
teristics of 524 Sorghum collections were analysed in
terms of inflorescence morphology, seed colour and
tannin content. A survey of crop frequency and prefer-
ence was also extended to Caprivi and Kavango. All
except three of the priority areas for primitive cereal
crops in South Africa and South West Africa/Namibia
have now been included in the survey and collecting
programme.
Miss Swanepoel, who joined our staff in February
1986, took over from Mrs K. J. Musil who resigned in
July 1985, and assists Mr Arnold with his food plant
research.
Barrier plants
The survey of barrier plants by Miss L. Henderson is
complete and is scheduled for publication in 1986/87.
146
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
The memoir will present information on 504 species (of
which 220 are indigenous and 42 are illustrated) and
suggests indigenous barrier plants that can be grown
instead of invasive alien ones.
Woody invaders
A popular version of the report on woody plant invad-
ers of the Transvaal with 16 colour illustrations has been
prepared for publication by Miss Henderson. It will
enable laymen to identify the worst plant invaders, and
gives hints on their control. In July 1985 Miss Hender-
son transferred from our staff to the staff of the Plant
Protection Research Institute, with whom we work
closely, and will concentrate on surveys of invader
plants in future.
National weed list
Preparation for publication of the expanded ‘National
weed list’, now titled ‘A catalogue of problem plants in
southern Africa’ was completed by Mr Wells and his
team. It will appear shortly as number 53 in the Memoirs
of the Botanical Survey of South Africa series. It pro-
vides basic information on 1 653 species and includes a
list of 711 invasive alien species, and a common name
index incorporating more than 8 000 names. Its appear-
ance is expected to stimulate the collection of many more
data, which may result in the preparation of an enlarged,
second edition in several years’s time. Already much
additional information has been collected on the alien
invader plants on the subcontinent by Mrs Musil, Mr
Balsinhas and others. This has been incorporated in a
preliminary account of the history of introduction of in-
vasive aliens (in press).
Declared weeds and invader plants
A publication has been prepared by Mrs D. M. C.
Fourie and co-workers, to enable members of the public
and law enforcement officers to identify the 47 species of
declared weeds and 9 species of declared alien invader
plants covered by the provision of the ‘Conservation of
Agricultural Resources Act’ of 1983. It is based on an
earlier publication ‘Common weeds in South Africa’ by
Henderson & Anderson (1966) and includes black and
white illustrations, descriptions, a copy of the relevant
legislation and advice on control.
Water conservation gardening
The drought has maintained public interest in water
conservation gardening, resulting in continued demand
for the publication by Mrs D. M. C. Fourie (Department
of Agriculture and Water Supply, Bulletin 402), and for
lectures on the subject.
Garden utilization
Mrs H. Joffe of the Plant Protection Research Insti-
tute, who had been assisting with the preparation of the
catalogue of problem plants, transferred to our staff in
June 1985. Her new task is to improve scientific utiliza-
tion of the botanical garden in various ways including
taking specimens and photographs.
Scientific information service
Mrs Fourie handled 255 written and 259 telephonic
requests for information, often involving the identifica-
tion of exotic plants. She also dealt with 39 visiting
researchers and two groups.
Liaison service
Mrs S. D. Hewitt dealt with 1 172 non-scientific visi-
tors including 28 groups (mainly of school children).
The flow of visitors requiring educational services has
fallen off markedly as a result of the economic situation.
Pretoria National Botanical Garden
Despite the drought and many staff changes, the
garden under Mr D. H. Dry continued to prosper. Staff
changes included the resignations of: Mr K. D. Panagos
(July 1985), Miss S. C. Kruger (November 1985) and
Mr H. J. de Villiers (December 1985): Mr H. J. N. de
Beer retired (April 1986). Mrs B. C. de Wet was
transferred to Datametrics in January 1986 and Miss J.
A. Taussig was transferred to the Herbarium Division in
September 1985. On the positive side, Mr N. A. Klap-
wijk was appointed in January 1985 and other vacant
posts have been filled since the report year ended, but for
many months the staff position in the garden was critical.
We were fortunate that during this testing time our exist-
ing boreholes continued to deliver and a new one came
into production.
Other new developments included the completion of
most of the fencing and paving of the new eastern access
road, completion of three paths along the nature trail and
the installation of new garden benches (Figure 3). The
living plant collection grew by 784 accessions, mostly
FIGURE 3. — One of the new garden benches which have been
installed in the garden. Two members of staff, Mrs J. Mogford
and Mrs C. du Plessis enjoy the shady spot at lunchtime.
FIGURE 4. — Mr D. S. Hardy admiring an Erythrina mendesii in the
new Namib shade house at the nursery. The succulent just behind
the flowering plant is Cyphostemma uter (Exell & Mendonca)
Desc.
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
147
collected for the Karoo Biome by Miss Kruger, who
directed further development of the karoo koppies where
126 shrubs and 3 000 ground cover plants were estab-
lished. Mr D. S. Hardy was responsible for the re-plant-
ing of a large shade house with rare and endangered
species from Namaqualand and the Namib (Figure 4). A
large amount of research material, including 317
grasses, was also accessioned. The garden records team,
Mrs De Wet and Mrs K. P. Clarke, concentrated on
upgrading the labelling of the savanna biome.
148
BothaLia 17,1 (1987)
BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Scientific, Technical and Administrative Staff
(31st March 1986)
Director
B. de Winter, M.Sc., D.Sc. (Taxonomy of Poaceae,
especially Eragrostis and of Hermannia', plant
geography)
Herbarium Assistants Mrs S . Burger
Mrs P. W. van der Helde
Wing B (Piperaceae-Oxalidaceae)
Senior Agricultural Re- G. Germishuizen, M.Sc.
searcher (Polygonaceae)
Deputy Director
D. J. B. Killick, M.Sc., Ph.D., F.L.S. (General tax-
onomy, nomenclature, mountain ecology and editing)
ADMINISTRATION
Provisioning Administra-
tion Officer
State Accountant
Senior Provisioning Ad-
ministration Clerks
Personal Secretary to
Director
Senior Registration Clerk
Registration Clerk
Accounting Clerk
Receptionist
Typists
Mrs D. J. Gerber
MrsJ. Rautenbach
Miss W. J. Geldenhuys
Mrs S. Swanepoel
Mrs I. A. Ebersohn
Mrs J. van Niekerk, B.A.
(Ed.)
Mrs M. M. Loots
Mrs I. J. Joubert*
Mrs C. du Plessis
Miss B.A. Language
Miss L. Lippi
Mrs S. S. Brink
Mrs E. L. Bunton*
Mrs S. M. Thiart*
Mrs M. P. M. C. van der
Merwe*
Mrs J. M. Mulvenna
Agricultural Researcher . . .
Assistant Agricultural Re-
searcher
Chief Agricultural Re-
search Technician
Administrative Assistant
hi
Senior Agricultural Re-
searcher
Agricultural Researcher . . .
Agricultural Research As-
sistant
Herbarium Assistant
Mrs C. M. van Wyk,
M.Sc. (Cape flora &
Geraniaceae)
A. Nicholas, M.Sc.
(General identifications)
Mrs B. J. Pienaar, B.Sc.
Hons (Vigna)
C. Letsoalo
Miss E. Retief, M.Sc.
(Cucurbitaceae, fruit &
seed collection)
Miss K. L. Immelman,
M.Sc.
A. A. Balsinhas**
Mrs J. L. M. Grobler*
Wing D (Convolvulaceae-Asteraceae)
Senior Agricultural Re-
searcher
Senior Agricultural Re-
search Technician
Administrative Assistant
in
Miss W. G. Welman,
M.Sc. (Asteraceae)
Mrs M. J. A. W. Crosby*,
B.Sc.
J. Phahla
Wing C (Linaceae-Asclepiadaceae)
HERBARIUM DIVISION
Officer-in-Charge T. H. Arnold, M.Sc.
NATIONAL HERBARIUM, PRETORIA (PRE)
Assistant Director T. H. Arnold, M.Sc.
(Curator)
Provisioning Administra- Mrs C. J. van Niekerk
tion Clerk
Wing A (Pteridophytes-Monocotyledons)
Senior Agricultural Re-
searcher
Chief Agricultural Re-
search Technician
* Half-day
** Part-lime
Miss C. Reid, B.Sc. Hons
(Cyperaceae)
Mrs L. Fish, B.Sc.
(Poaceae)
Cryptogamic Herbarium
Agricultural Researcher . . .
Assistant Agricultural Re-
searcher
Chief Agricultural Re-
search Technician
Herbarium Assistant
Services
Agricultural Researcher . . .
Herbarium Assistants
Typist
F. A. Brusse, M.Sc.
(Lichens)
J. van Rooy, B.Sc. Hons
(Musci)
Mrs S. M. Perold*, B.Sc.
(SEM technician, Ric-
ciaceae)
Mrs L. Filter*
Mrs E. van Hoepen,
M.Sc. (Controlling
officer)
Mrs M. Dednam* (Identi-
fication records)
Mrs M. Z. Heymann*
(Loans and exchanges)
Mrs A. M. Verhoef
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
149
Administrative Assistant G. Lephaka (Preparation
HI and packaging)
NATAL HERBARIUM, DURBAN (NH)
Senior Agricultural Re-
search Technician
Provisioning Administra-
tive Clerk
Administrative Assistants
m
Administrative Assistants
n
Mrs M. Jordaan, B.Sc.
(Curator, Celastraceae,
general identifications)
MrsH. E. Noble*
C. N. Buthelezi
A. M. Ngwenya
S. H. Nzimande (Mes-
senger)
S. B. Nzimande (Gar-
dener)
ALBANY MUSEUM HERBARIUM, GRAHAMSTOWN (GRA)
Senior Agricultural Re-
searcher
Assistant Agricultural Re-
searcher
Herbarium Assistant
Administrative Assistants
m
Administrative Assistant I
Mrs E. Brink, B.Sc.
(Curator, general identi-
fications)
Mrs A. F. M. G. Jacot
Guillarmod*, D.Sc.
Mrs M. L. Furlong
A. D. Booi
R. Klaas (Grahamstown
Nature Reserve)
J. Zenzile
GOVERNMENT HERBARIUM, STELLENBOSCH (STE)
ivi. rviiuciauii,
Ph.D. (Palaeobotany,
plant geography)
Agricultural Researchers
Senior Agricultural Re-
search Technician
Graphic Artist
Agricultural Research As-
sistant
H. F. Glen, M.Sc., Ph.D.,
F.L.S. (Taxonomy of
Aloe)
Miss K. L. Immel-
man, M.Sc. (Taxo-
nomy, especially Acan-
thaceae, Urticaceae)
H. P. Linder, Ph. D. (Tax-
onomy of Restionaceae,
Orchidaceae, Poaceae)
B. D. Schrire, M.Sc.
(Taxonomy of Faba-
ceae, electronic data
processing)
Mrs H. M. Anderson*,
M.Sc., Ph.D. (Palaeo-
botany)
Miss G. C. Condy, M. A.
Mrs W. J. G. Roux*
(Plant distributions,
specimen administra-
tion)
DATA SUBDIVISION
Data Officer G. E. Gibbs Russell,
Ph.D., F.L.S.
Datametrician Mrs B. C. de Wet, B.Sc.,
B.A.,H.D.L.S.*t (Pro-
gramming for PHYTO-
TAB)
Agricultural Research Mrs J. C. Mogford, B.Sc.
Technician (Quality control for
PRECIS, Database ma-
nager since July 1985)
Agricultural Research As- Mrs E. B. Evenwel (Qual-
sistants ity control for PRECIS)
Mrs H. von Ronge (New
specimen encoder for
PRECIS)
BIOSYSTEMATICS DIVISION
Officer-in-Charge
Assistant Director
Senior Liaison Officer
Senior Agricultural Re-
search Technician
O. A. Leistner, M.Sc.,
D.Sc., F.L.S.
O. A. Leistner, M.Sc.,
D.Sc., F.L.S. (Editing)
Mrs E. P. du Plessis,
B.Sc. Hons, S.E.D.
(Editing and translating)
Mrs B. A. Momberg*,
B.Sc. (Editing)
PLANT STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION DIVISION
Officer-in-Charge R. P. Ellis, M.Sc., D.Sc.
COMPARATIVE LEAF ANATOMY
* Half-day
t Biometry and Datametncs
Assistant Director R. P. Ellis, M.Sc., D.Sc.
(Anatomy of grasses)
150
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
Senior Agricultural Re-
searcher
Agricultural Research As-
sistant
P. P. J. Herman, M.Sc.
(Wood anatomy)
Mrs H. Ebertsohn (Micro-
technique)
CYTOGENETICS
Senior Agricultural Re-
searcher
Agricultural Research-
Technicians
J. J. Spies, M.Sc., D.Sc
(Cytogenetics of gras-
ses)
Miss H. du Plessis, B.Sc
(Cytogenetics of gras-
ses)
Miss A. Jonker, B.Sc
(Cytogenetics of gras-
ses)
PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
Photographer Mrs. A. J. Romanowski
MARY GUNN LIBRARY
Senior Librarian Mrs E. Potgieter* , B . Libr.
Library Assistant Mrs B. F. Lategan*!
VEGETATION ECOLOGY DIVISION
Officer- in-Charge
Assistant Director
Senior Agricultural Re-
searchers
Agricultural Resarchers ...
J. C. Scheepers, M.Sc.,
D.Sc.
J. C. Scheepers, M.Sc.,
D.Sc. (Vegetation ecol-
ogy, especially of
forest / woodland /
grassland relationships;
conservation and land-
use planning; phytogeo-
graphy)
H. C. Taylor, M.Sc.
(Mountain fynbos and
forest ecology; Braun-
Blanquet approach and
techniques; conserva-
tion)
P. J. Weisser, Ph.D. (for-
est ecology; air-photo
interpretation and map-
ping; reedswamp ecol-
ogy; Zululand coast-
dune vegetation; conser-
vation)
R. H. Westfall, M.Sc.
(Ecology and phytoso-
ciology of Transvaal
bushveld; ecological
data and literature stor-
age, retrieval and pro-
cessing; syntaxonomic
nomenclature)
D. J. McDonald, M.Sc.
(Mountain fynbos ecol-
* Library Services, Department of National Education
t Half-clay
ogy and phytosocio-
logy; Braun-Blanquet
approach and techni-
ques)
G. B. Deall, M.Sc. (Vege-
tation ecology of forest/
woodland / grassland in-
terrelationships)
M. G. O’Callaghan, M.Sc.
(Estuarine ecology and
phytosociology)
Assistant Agricultural Re- Miss B. J. Turner, B.Sc.
searchers Hons (Grassland ecol-
ogy; pasture science;
nature conservation)
J. M. van Staden, B.Sc.
Hons (Bushveld ecol-
ogy; pasture science;
nature conservation)
Senior Agricultural Re- Miss A. P. Backer, B.Sc.
search Technicians (Ecological data pro-
cessing and presenta-
tion; ecological litera-
ture; nature conserva-
tion; air- photo interpre-
tation and cartography)
M. D. Panagos, N. Dipl.
Agric. (Bot. Res.)
(Computer science; data
processing; sampling
and monitoring vegeta-
tion and environment)
Agricultural Research Miss K. A. Longley,
Technicians B.Sc. (Sampling and
monitoring vegetation
and environment)
Miss M. Morley, B.Sc.
Agric. (Ecological data
processing and presen-
tation; ecological litera-
ture; estuarine and fyn-
bos vegetation; air-
photo interpretation and
cartography)
Mrs J. Schaap, H.P.E.D.
(Draughtsmanship and
cartography; artwork,
layout and design)
Miss A. Stadler, B.Sc.
(Ecological data pro-
cessing and presenta-
tion; ecological litera-
ture; nature conserva-
tion; air-photo interpre-
tation and cartography)
J. F. van Blerk, B.Sc.
(Grassland and karoo
ecology; ecological lit-
erature; pasture science)
Mrs B. J. Vermeulen,
B.Sc. For. (Nat. Cons.)
(Ecological data bank-
ing; information sys-
tems; syntaxonomic
nomenclature)
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
151
EXPERIMENTAL ECOLOGY DIVISION
Officer-in-Charge
Assistant Director
Senior Agricultural Re-
searcher
Agricultural Researcher . . .
Assistant Agricultural Re-
searchers
Agricultural Research
Technicians
Agricultural Research
Assistant
M. C. Rutherford, M.Sc.,
Ph.D., Dipl. Datamet.
M. C. Rutherford, M.Sc.,
Ph.D., Dipl. Datamet.
(Primary production
ecology of terrestrial
ecosystems; experi-
mental ecological stu-
dies in fynbos and
Karoo)
C. F. Musil, M. Sc.,
Ph.D. (Reproductive
ecophysiology in fyn-
bos)
Miss F. M. Pressinger,
B.Sc. Hons (Ecophysio-
logical studies of com-
petitive stress in fynbos
ecosystems)
G. W. Davis, M.Sc.
(Transformations of
fynbos ecosystems by
the wild flower picking
industry)
G. F. Midgley, B.Sc.
Hons (Plant water rela-
tions in Karoo eco-
systems)
A. P. Flynn, B.Sc. (Fyn-
bos ecology; plant com-
munity development)
J. de W. Bosenberg, B.Sc.
Hons (Karoo and fynbos
ecology; monitoring
effects of alien plants on
fynbos)
D. M. de Witt (Labora-
tory, field and curatorial
assistance)
Senior Agricultural Re-
searchers
Assistant Agricultural Re-
searcher
Principal Agricultural Re-
search Technician
Agricultural Research
Technicians
Liaison Officer
(Weeds research,
botanical horticulture,
fynbos utilization and
conservation)
Miss. L. Henderson,
B.Sc. Hons (Cover and
barrier plants, woody
exotic invaders)
Miss S. E. Chadwick,
B.Sc. Hons (Indigenous
food plants and prim-
itive crops)
Mrs D. M. C. Fourie*,
B.Sc. (Scientific infor-
mation service)
A. A. Balsinhas** (Indi-
genous food plant data
bank)
Mrs H. Joffe*, B.Sc.
(Garden utilization)
Miss A. E. Swanepoel,
B.Sc. (Crop plants of
African origin)
Mrs S. D. Hewitt, B.A.
(Public relations)
PRETORIA NATIONAL BOTANICAL GARDEN
Chief Agricultural Re-
search Technician
(Curator)
Senior Agricultural Re-
search Technician
D. H. Dry, NTC (Hort.)
Dipl.
D. S. Hardy (Nursery
supervision, succulents
and orchids)
Pupil Agricultural
search Technician
Re- N. A. Klapwijk
Agricultural
Assistants
Farm Foremen .
Research Mrs K. P. Clarke (Garden
records)
Miss J. A. Taussig, Nat.
Dipl. (Hort.)
H.N. J. deBeer
L. C. Steenkamp
PLANT EXPLORATION DIVISION
Officer-in-Charge M . J . Wells , M . Sc .
Assistant Director M. J. Wells, M.Sc.
* Half-day
** Part time
PUBLICATIONS BY THE STAFF
(1985.04.01-1986.03.31)
ANDERSON, J. M. 1985. Review: Palaeobotany and evolution of
plants by L. N. Stewardt. South African Journal of Science 81:
639-640.
ANDERSON, J. M. & H. M. 1985. Prodromus of southern African
megafloras. Devonian to Lower Cretaceous. Palaeoflora of
southern Africa. Balkema, Rotterdam.
ARNOLD, T. H., WELLS, M. J. & WEHMEYER, A. S. 1985.
Khoisan food plants: taxa with potential for future economic
exploitation. In G. E. Wickens, J. R. Goodin & D. V. Field,
Plants for arid lands: 69-86. Allen & Unwin, London.
BRUSSE, F. 1985. Corynecystis, a new lichen genus from the Karoo,
South Africa. Bothalia 15: 552-553.
BRUSSE, F. 1985. Glyphopeltis (Lecideaceae), a new lichen genus
from southern Africa. Lichenologist 17: 267-268.
BRUSSE, F. 1986. Dermatiscum fallax (Physciaceae), a new lichen
from southern Africa. Mycotaxon 25: 161-164.
CHADWICK, S. E. 1985. Bauhinia petersiana — a highly prized tree.
Forestry News 4: 8-9.
CODD, L. E. 1985. Plectranthus coeruleus. Flowering Plants of
Africa 48: t. 1903.
CODD, L. E. 1985. Plectranthus hilliardii. Flowering Plants of Africa
48: t. 1904.
CODD, L. E.1985. Plectranthus petiolaris. Flowering Plants of Africa
48: t. 1905.
CODD, L. E. 1985. Pachypodium lamerei. Flowering Plants of Africa
48: t. 1915.
CODD, L. E. 1985. Pachypodium baronii var. windsori. Flowering
Plants of Africa 48: t. 1916.
152
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
CODD, L. E. & GUNN, M. 1985. Additional biographical notes on
plant collectors in southern Africa. Bothalia 15: 631-654.
DAVIDSE, G. & ELLIS, R. P. 1985. Steyermarkochloa unifolia, a
new genus from Venezuela and Colombia (Poaceae: Arundinoi-
deae: Steyermarkochloeae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical
GardenlX: 994-1012.
DRY, D. H. 1985. Biografie: J. S. van Staden. Parke Administrasie
Apr.: 32-35.
DRY, D. H. 1985. Biografie: A. N. Dry. Parke Administrasie Okt.:
45.
DRY, D. H. 1986. Haelskade. Parke Administrasie Jan.: 61 .
DRY, D. H. 1986. Student horticulturists: Danie Dry says . . . Parke
Administrasie Jan.: 64—66.
ELLIS, R. P. 1985. Leaf anatomy of the South African Danthonieae
(Poaceae). X. Pseudopentameris. Bothalia 15: 561-566.
ELLIS, R. P. 1985. Leaf anatomy of the South African Danthonieae
(Poaceae). XI. Pentameris longiglumis and Pentameris sp. nov.
Bothalia 15: 567-571.
ELLIS, R. P. 1985. Leaf anatomy of the South African Danthonieae
(Poaceae). XU. Pentameris thuarii. Bothalia 15: 573-578.
ELLIS, R. P. 1985. Leaf anatomy of the South African Danthonieae
(Poaceae). XIII. Pentameris macrocalycina and P. obtusifolia.
Bothalia 15: 579-585.
GERMISHUIZEN, G. 1985. Baikiaea pluriiuga. Flowering Plants of
Africa 48: t. 1912.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G. E. 1985. Analysis of the size and composition
of the southern African flora. Bothalia 15: 613-630.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G. E. 1985. Review: Plants of the Cape Flora, a
descriptive catalogue by Pauline Bond and Peter Goldblatt. Botha-
lia 15: 779.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G. E., GERMISHUIZEN, G., REID, C.,
RETIEF, E., SMOOK, L. & WELMAN, W. G. 1985. New taxa,
new records and name changes for southern African plants.
Bothalia 15: 751-759.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G. E., REID, C., VAN ROOY, J. & SMOOK, L.
1985. List of species of southern African plants, Edn 2, Part 1.
Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 5 1 .
GLEN, H. F. 1985. Astridia citrina. Flowering Plants of Africa 48: t.
1917.
HARDY, D. S. 1985. The Namib, a living sea of sand. 1. Aloe 22:
28-29.
HARDY, D. S. 1985. She hitched her wagon to a daisy. Aloe 22:
30-31.
HARDY, D. S. 1985. For the love of an island. 9. Aloe 22: 40-42.
HARDY, D. S. 1985. Aloe vaombe. Aloe 22: 44-^15.
HARDY, D. S. 1985. Aloe divaricata. Aloe 22: 52.
HARDY, D. S. 1985. For the love of an island. 10. Aloe 22: 65-66.
HARDY, D. S. 1985. The Namib, a living sea of sand. 2. Aloe 22:
67-68.
HARDY, D. S. 1985. The Namib, a living sea of sand. 3. Aloe 22:
78-79.
HARDY, D. S. 1985. For the love of an island. 1 1 . Aloe 22: 84—85.
HARDY, D. S. 1985. Aloe antandroi. Aloe 22: 88-89.
HARDY, D. S. 1985. Aloe cryptoflora. Flowering Plants of Africa 48:
t. 1901.
HARDY, D. S. 1985. Aloe compressa var. schistophila. Flowering
Plants of Africa 48: t. 1902.
IMMELMAN, K. L. 1985. Justicia capensis. Flowering Plants of
Africa 48: t. 1920.
JACOT GUILLARMOD, A. F. M. G. 1985. Silk and spikes. 8. Hakea
sericea. Grocott’ s Mail, Grahamstown, 20 Sept. p. 2.
JACOT GUILLARMOD, A. F. M. G. 1985. Gums: the water thieves.
9. Eucalyptus sp. Grocott’ s Mail, Grahamstown, 8 Oct. p. 3.
JACOT GUILLARMOD, A. F. M. G. 1986. Vegetation of the Gra-
hamstown area. In J. B. Mcl. Daniel, W. Holleman & A. Jacot
Guillarmod, Grahamstown and its environs: 18-25. Albany
Museum, Grahamstown.
JACOT GUILLARMOD, A. F. M. G. & EVA, P. M. 1985. Limnolo-
gical bibliography for Africa south of the Sahara 38: 1-26. Lim-
nological Society of southern Africa, Grahamstown.
JARMAN, M. L., BEESTON, P., CLARK, D., PRESSINGER,
F. M. & MAUGHAN-BROWN, R. 1985. Monitoring infesta-
tions and control operations. In I. A. W. McDonald, M. L. Jar-
man & P. Beeston, Management of invasive alien plants in the
Fynbos Biome: 115-119. S.A. National Scientific Programmes
Report III.
LEISTNER, O. A. 1985. Review: Guide to the prices of antiquarian
and second-hand botanical books (1979-1982): flowering plants
by L. Vogelensang. Bothalia 15: 777-778.
LINDER, H. P. 1985. Conspectus of the African species of Res-
tionaceae. Bothalia 15: 387-503.
LINDER, H. P. 1985. A new name for Disa patens (Orchidaceae).
Bothalia 15: 553.
LINDER, H. P. 1985. On the pollen morphology and phylogeny of the
Restionales and Poales. Grana 24: 65-76.
MANNING, K. S., LYNN, D. G., SHABANOWITZ, J., FELLOWS,
L. E., SINGH, M. & SCHRIRE, B. D. 1985. A glucuronidase
inhibitor from the seeds of Baphia racemosa: application of fast
atom bombardment coupled with collision activated dissociation
in natural product structure assignment. Journal of the Chemical
Society. Chemical Communications: 127-129.
McDONALD, D. J. 1985. The plant communities of Swartboschkloof,
Jonkershoek. South African National Scientific Programmes
Report No. 104. CSIR, Pretoria.
McDONALD, D. j. 1985. Swartboschkloof — have you been there?
Veld & Flora 71: 70-73.
MOFFETT, R. O. 1985. Sarcocaulon herrei. Flowering Plants of
Africa 48: t. 1907.
MUSIL, C. F. & BREEN, C. M. 1985a. The development from
kinetic coefficients of a predictive model for the growth of Eich-
hornia crassipes in the field. I. Generating kinetic coefficients for
the model in greenhouse culture. Bothalia 15: 689-703.
MUSIL, C. F. & BREEN, C. M. 1985b. The development from ki-
netic coefficients of a predictive model for the growth of Eichhor-
nia crassipes in the field. II. Testing and refining the model under
field conditions. Bothalia 15: 705-724.
MUSIL, C. F. & BREEN, C. M. 1985c. The development from
kinetic coefficients of a predictive model for the growth of Eich-
hornia crassipes in the field. III. Testing a model for predicting
growth rates from plant nutrient concentrations. Bothalia 15:
725-781.
MUSIL, C. F. & BREEN, C. M. 1985d. The development from
kinetic coefficients of a predictive model for the growth of Eich-
hornia crassipes in the field. IV. Application of the model to the
Vernon Hooper Dam — a eutrophied South African impound-
ment. Bothalia 15: 733-748.
MUSIL, C. F. & WARD, C. J. 1986. A classification of the water
plant communities of Natal, South Africa — a synopsis. Garcia
de Orta, Ser. Bot. 6: 151-162 (1983-84).
NICHOLAS, A. & BREDENKAMP, B. 1985. Die bosse van die
suidelike Natalse middellande. Veld & FloralX: 14-16.
OLIVER, E. G. H. 1985. A new species of Philippia, from the
Drakensberg (Ericaceae). Bothalia 15: 550-551.
OLIVER, E. G. H. 1985. Review: The Flora of Australia (Vol. 22) ed.
by Alex S. George. Bothalia 15: 778.
PROZESKY, L., KELLERMAN, T. S., JORDAAN, P., WELMAN,
W. G. & JOUBERT, J. P. J. 1985. An ovine hepatotoxicosis
caused by the plant Hertia pollens (DC.) Kuntze (Asteraceae).
Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 52: 233-238.
REBELO, A. G., SIEGFRIED, W. R. & OLIVER, E. G. H. 1985.
Pollination syndromes of Erica species in the south-western Cape.
South African Journal of Botany 51: 270-280.
REID, C. 1985. Lachenalia abides. Flowering Plants of Africa 48: t.
1910.
SPIES, J. J. 1986. Hybridization potential of Lantana camara (Verbe-
naceae). Garcia de Orta, Ser. Bot. 6: 145-150(1983-84).
SPIES, J. J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1985. The genus Rubus in South
Africa. I. Chromosome numbers and geographical distribution of
species. Bothalia 15: 591-596.
SPIES , J . J . , DU PLESSIS , H . & LIEBENBERG , H . 1 985 . The genus
Rubus in South Africa. II. Meiotic chromosome behaviour.
Bothalia 15: 597-606.
VOLK, O. H. & PEROLD, S. M. 1985. Studies in the genus Riccia
(Marchantiales) from southern Africa. 1 . Two new species of the
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
153
section Pilifer. R. duthieae and R. alatospora. Bothalia 15:
531-539.
WELLS, M. J. 1985. Review: Medicinal plants of north Africa by
Loutfy Boulos. Bothalia 15: 778-779.
WESTFALL, R. H. 1985. PHYTOCAP. A field data capture program
for the PHYTOTAB program package. Bothalia 15: 749-750.
WESTFALL, R. H., GLEN, H. F.& PANAGOS, M. D. 1986. A new
identification aid combining the features of a polyclave and an
analytical key. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 92:
65-73.
WESTFALL, R. H., VAN ROOYEN, N. & THERON, G. K. 1985.
The plant ecology of the farm Groothoek, Thabazimbi District. II.
Classification. Bothalia 15: 655-688.
Bothalia 17,1: 155 (1987)
Book Reviews
GRASSES OF SOUTH WEST AFRICA/NAMIBIA by M. A. N.
MULLER. Directorate of Agriculture and Forestry, Department of
Agriculture and Nature Conservation, South West Africa/Namibia.
1984. Pp. 287, numerous black-and-white photographs and 116 line
drawings. Price R9,90excl. GST.
The book is a field guide to the agriculturally important grasses of
South West Africa/Namibia. It is divided into two parts. Part 1 is
concerned with the vegetation types of South West Africa/Namibia,
based on Giess’s preliminary vegetation map published in Dinteria 4 of
1971. A clear, coloured map shows the distribution of 14 of these
vegetation types, but the 15th vegetation type. Riverine Woodland, is
not mapped. The vegetation types are illustrated by black-and-white
photographs and are briefly described with some of the common plant
species listed.
Part 2 deals with the grasses. Introductory information consists of a
line drawing showing the structure of a grass plant, followed by a brief
glossary of botanical terms. Unfortunately, the glossary is incomplete
since terms such as keeled, tripartite, pedicel and peduncle are used in
the text but are not defined in the glossary and could confuse the
layman or amateur botanist. Another term used is ‘omiramba’, an
Ovambo word apparently referring to a dry river bed. This term is not
widely known outside the territory and should therefore be defined in
the book.
Grass inflorescences are classified into five basic types, and simple
and advanced keys to the grass genera are given. The simple key uses
macroscopic floristic and vegetative characters whereas the advanced
key uses floristic characters requiring 10 x magnification.
The bulk of Part 2 consists of descriptions of 115 grass species,
arranged alphabetically by genus and species. Lastly, there are four
indices; an index to botanical names and indices to common names in
English, Afrikaans and German.
In the species treatments the following information is given: origin
of the scientific name; common names in English, Afrikaans and Ger-
man; inflorescence type; a description in terms of habit and vegetative
and floristic characters; distribution; and general information including
serai status, habitat, soils, payability, and in some cases, economic
value. Accompanying the written text are clear line drawings illustrat-
ing the habit, inflorescence, spikelet and the ligule; a distribution map;
and for some species, a black-and-white photograph showing the habit.
The simple key to the genera will help considerably in identifying
the grasses to genus level, and the detailed line drawings and the
descriptions will permit the identification of species. In view of the
absence of keys to the species, it is a pity that distinguishing characters
are not given for each species, as is done in Chippindall and Crook’s
240 grasses of southern Africa (1976). Furthermore, the floristic data
for each species are not very detailed. Data given include: inflor-
escence shape, size and branching; spikelet length, colour and some-
times shape; and presence of pedicels, hairs and awns. Mention is only
rarely made of the number of flowers in a spikelet and the sexuality of
the florets.
This book will succeed in assisting the farmer and the layman in
identifying and getting to know grasses. The inclusion of common
names will help the person who is only familiar with these names to
find a species in the book. The inclusion of general information about
each species imparts useful knowledge on the value and the ecology of
the plant.
As a general field guide this book will be of value to the botanist. Its
major shortcoming is the absence of a key to the species. It would help
if greater floristic detail had been included to ensure a more reliable
identification than would be obtained by matching a plant to the draw-
ings and descriptions given. The inclusion of the key to the four
subspecies of Aristida stipitata is most useful, as are the occasional
notes describing the differences between similar species.
As is the case with most publications aimed at assisting in grass
identification, insufficient attention is given to the vegetative charac-
ters of each species. This book does describe a range of vegetative
characters, but easily determined characters such as ligule length and
shape, leaf shape and nature (eg. serrated), etc. are not given consistent
attention. Vegetative characters can be diagnostic and so assist in iden-
tification. The heavy reliance on floristic characters for grass identifi-
cation limits the usefulness of such a book to the period when the plants
are in flower. A more complete and systematic description of the vege-
tative characters of a species would be very useful, particularly for the
person who is required to identify grass species at all times of the year.
A more serious defect in the book is that the title may lead the reader
to suppose that all grasses in South West Africa/Namibia are covered.
However, the 115 species represented are only about a third of the 350
grass species recorded for the territory. Only in one sentence in the
Introduction is it stated that the 115 species were selected for agricultu-
ral importance, but even then the total size of the known grass flora,
and therefore the coverage of the work, is not made clear. This omis-
sion renders an absolute disservice to our knowledge of the plants of
the area in two ways: first, a casual user may experience great difficulty
in attempting to identify one of the 235 grasses from South West
Africa/Namibia that do not appear in the book; second, and more
seriously, a false impression is given about the size and complexity of
an extremely important component of the flora. This false impression
in a book destined for a wide spectrum of users can have an adverse
effect on planning for agricultural extension and nature conservation if
systems are depicted as being less complex than they really are.
BEVERLEY TURNER
FLORA OF AUSTRALIA (Vol. 46), Iridaceae to Dioscoreaceae, edi-
ted by ALEXANDER S. GEORGE. Australian Government Publish-
ing Service, Canberra. 1986. Pp 247, line drawings and 16 colour
photographs; 248 maps. Price $A 26.00 (soft cover edn), $A 30.00
(casebound edn).
Volume 46 is the seventh to be published and covers the families
Iridaceae, Aloeaceae, Agavaceae, Xanthorrhoeaceae, Hanguanaceae,
Taccaceae, Stemonaceae, Smilacaceae, and Dioscoreaceae, arranged
according to Cronquist, An integrated system of classification of flow-
ering plants (1981). There are 14 contributors.
Volume 22 was reviewed by Oliver in Bothalia 15: 778 (1985), and
much of the discussion and criticism contained therein applies also to
the present volume. One worthwhile change noted is that all the distri-
bution maps are grouped together at the end of the book, rather than in
pages of 15 maps at a time scattered throughout.
As usual the frontispiece and dustjacket bear an attractive colour
painting of an included species, in this case Patersonia australis R. Br.
The colour photographs are of doubtful taxonomic value but do add
interest to the volume.
It is interesting to note that roughly three-quarters of the Iridaceae
flora is introduced, much of it from Cape Province, South Africa, and
that a number of these introductions are becoming serious weeds. In
many cases they are becoming extinct in their native habitat. Unfortu-
nately in Aloeaceae, the South African introduction Aloe maculata All.
is listed as its synonym, A. saponaria (Ait.) Haw. Nomenclature of this
species was discussed by Dandy in Taxon 19: 617 (1970). (The sou-
thern African species are currently under revision by H.F. Glen and
D.S. Hardy for the Flora of southern Africa.)
The stated editorial policy for Flora of Australia, of using simple
descriptive terms makes this a very easy-to-use Flora. Its conciseness is
maintained by placing descriptions of new taxa, new combinations and
lectotypifications in the appendix, which also contains a very useful
supplementary glossary plus a list of contractions and abbreviations.
C. REID
"
I
Bothalia 17,1 157-162(1987)
Guide for authors to Bothalia
This guide is updated when necessary. The latest ver-
sion should therefore be consulted.
Bothalia is named in honour of General Louis Botha,
first Premier and Minister of Agriculture of the Union of
South Africa. This house journal of the Botanical Re-
search Institute is devoted to the furtherance of botanical
science. The main fields covered are taxonomy, ecol-
ogy, anatomy and cytology. Two parts of the journal and
an index to contents, authors and subjects are published
annually.
EDITORIAL POLICY
Bothalia welcomes original papers dealing with flora
and vegetation of southern Africa and related subjects.
Full-length papers and short notes, as well as book re-
views, are accepted. Manuscripts may be written in
either English or Afrikaans.
Articles are assessed by referees at the discretion of
the editor. Authors are welcome to suggest possible refe-
rees to judge their work. Authors are responsible for the
factual correctness of their contributions. Bothalia main-
tains an editorial board (see title page) to ensure that
international standards are upheld.
PRESENTATION OF MANUSCRIPT
Manuscripts should be typewritten on one side of good
quality A4-size paper, double-spaced throughout (in-
cluding abstract, tables, captions to figures, literature
references etc.) and have a margin of at least 30 mm all
round. The original and three photocopies (preferably
photocopied on both sides of the paper to reduce weight
for postage) of all items, including text, illustrations,
tables and lists should be submitted, and the author
should retain a complete set of copies. Papers should
conform to the general style and layout of recent issues
of Bothalia (from Volume 14 onwards). Material should
be presented in the following sequence: Title page with
title, name(s) of author(s), keywords, abstracts (in
English and Afrikaans) and information that should be
placed in a footnote on the title page, such as address(es)
of author(s) and mention of granting agencies. The se-
quence continues with Introduction and Aims, Material
and Methods, Result, Interpretation (Discussion), Ac-
knowledgements, Specimens examined (in revisions and
monographs), References, Index of Names (recom-
mended for revisions dealing with more than about 15
species), Tables, Captions for figures and figures. In the
case of short notes and book reviews, keywords and
abstract are superfluous. All pages must be numbered
consecutively beginning with the title page to those with
references, tables and captions to figures.
AUTHOR(S)
When there are several authors the covering letter
should indicate clearly which of them is responsible for
correspondence and, if possible, telephonically available
while the article is being processed. The contact address
and telephone number should be mentioned if they differ
from those given on the letterhead.
TITLE
The title should be as concise and as informative as
possible. In articles dealing with taxonomy or closely
related subjects the family of the taxon under discussion
(see also Names of taxa under General below) should be
mentioned in brackets but author citations should be
omitted from plant names.
KEYWORDS
Up to 10 keywords (or index terms) should be pro-
vided in English in alphabetical sequence. The following
points should be borne in mind when selecting key-
words:
1, Keywords should be unambiguous, internationally
acceptable words and not recently-coined little-known
words; 2, they should be in a noun form and verbs should
be avoided; 3, they should not consist of an adjective
alone; adjectives should be combined with nouns; 4, they
should not contain prepositions; 5, the singular form
should be used for processes and properties, e.g. evapo-
ration; 6, the plural form should be used for physical
objects, e.g. augers; 7, location (province and/or coun-
try); taxa (species, genus, family) and vegetation type
(community, veld type, biome) should be used as key-
words; 8, keywords should be selected hierarchically
where possible, e.g. both family and species should be
included; 9, they should include terms used in the title;
10, they should answer the following questions: 10.1,
what is the active concept in the document (activity,
operation or process); 10.2, what is the passive concept
or object of the active process (item on which the activ-
ity, operation or process takes place); 10.3, what is the
means of accomplishment or how is the active concept
achieved (technique, method, apparatus, operation or
process); 10.4, what is the environment in which the
active concept takes place (medium, location) and 10.5,
what are the independent (controlled) and dependent va-
riables? 11, questions 10.1 to 10.3 should preferably
also be answered in the title.
ABSTRACT
Abstracts of no more than 200 words should be pro-
vided in English and Afrikaans. Abstracts are of great
importance and should convey the essence of the article.
They should refer to the geographical area concerned
and, in taxonomic articles, mention the number of taxa
treated. They should not contain information not appear-
ing in the article. In articles dealing with taxonomy or
closely related subjects all taxa from the rank of genus
downwards should be accompanied by their author cita-
tions. Names of new taxa and new combinations should
not be underlined. If the article deals with too many taxa
only the important ones should be mentioned.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A table of contents should be given for all articles
longer than about six typed pages, unless they follow the
strict format of a taxonomic revision.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Acknowledgements should be kept to the minimum
compatible with the requirements of courtesy. Please
give all the initials of the person(s) you are thanking.
LITERATURE REFERENCES
In text
Literature references in the text should be cited as
follows: ‘Jones & Smith (1986) stated . . or ‘. . .
158
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
(Jones & Smith 1986)’ when giving a reference simply
as authority for a statement. When more than two au-
thors are involved use the name of the first author fol-
lowed by et al. When referring to more than one litera-
ture reference, they should be arranged alphabetically
according to author and separated by a semicolon, e.g.
(Anon. 1981, 1984; Davis 1976; Nixon 1940). Titles of
books and names of journals should preferably not be
mentioned in the text. If there is good reason for doing
so, they should be treated as described in the paragraph
In reference list below. Personal communications are
given only in the text, not in the list of references. Please
add the person’s full initials to identify the person more
positively.
In taxonomic articles
The correct name (not underlined) is to be followed by
its author citation (underlined) and the full literature re-
ference, with the name of the publication written out in
full. Thereafter all literature references, including those
of the synonyms, should only reflect author, page and
year of publication, e.g. C. E. Hubb. in Kew Bulletin
15: 307 (I960); Boris etal.: 14 (1966); Boris: 89 (1967);
Sims: t. 38 (1977). Note that (1) references are arranged
in chronological sequence; (2) where two or more refer-
ences by the same author are listed in succession, the
author’s name is repeated with every reference; (3)
names of authors are written in the same way (see Names
of authors of plant names under General), irrespective of
whether the person in question is cited as the author of a
plant name or of a publication; (4) the word ‘figure’ is
written as ‘fig.’, and ‘t. ’ is used for both ‘plate’ and
‘tablet’.
Literature references providing good illustrations of
the species in question may be cited in a paragraph com-
mencing with the word leones followed by a colon. This
paragraph is given after the last paragraph of the syno-
nymy.
In reference list
All publications referred to in the text, including those
mentioned in full in the treatment of correct names in
taxonomic papers, but no others, and no personal com-
munications, are listed at the end of the manuscript under
the heading References. The references are arranged al-
phabetically according to authors and chronologically
under each author, with a, b, c, etc. added to the year if
the author has published more than one work in a year. If
an author has published both on his own and as a senior
author with others, the solo publications are listed first
and after that, in strict alphabetical sequence, those pub-
lished with one or more other authors. Author names are
typed in capitals. Titles of journals and of books are
written out in full and are underlined as follows: Trans-
actions of the Linnean Society of London 5: 171-217, or
Biology and ecology of weeds : 24. Titles of books should
be given as in Taxonomic literature, edn 2 by Stafleu &
Cowan and names of journals as in World list of scien-
tific periodicals, edn 4. If the same author is mentioned
more than once the name is written out in full and not
replaced by a line.
Examples of references:
Collective book or Flora
BROWN, N. E. 1909. Asclepiadaceae. In W. T. Thiselton-Dyer,
Flora capensis 6,2: 518-1036. Reeve, London.
BROWN, N. E. 1915. Asclepiadaceae. In W. T. Thiselton-Dyer,
Flora of tropical Africa 5,2: 500-600. Reeve, London.
Book
DU TOIT, A. L. 1966. Geology of South Africa, 3rd edn, S. M.
Haughton (ed.). Oliver & Boyd, London.
HUTCHINSON, J. 1946. A botanist in southern Africa. Gawthom,
London.
Journal
MORRIS, J. W. 1969. An ordination of the vegetation of Ntshong-
weni, Natal. Bothalia 10: 89-120.
STEBBINS, G. L. Jr 1952. Aridity as a stimulus to plant evolution.
American Naturalist 86: 35-44.
SMOOK, L. & GIBBS RUSSELL, G. E. 1985. Poaceae. Memoirs of
the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 5 1 : 45-70.
In press, in preparation
TAYLOR, H. C. in press. A reconnaissance of the vegetation ofRooi-
berg State Forest. Department of Forestry, Technical Bulletin.
VOGEL, J. C. 1982. The age of the Kuiseb River silt terrace at
Homeb. Palaeoecology of Africa 15. In press.
WEISSER, P. J., GARLAND, J. F. & DREWS, B. K. in prep. Dune
advancement 1937-1977 and preliminary vegetation succession
chronology at Mlalazi Nature Reserve, Natal, South Africa.
Bothalia.
Thesis
KRUGER, F. J. 1974. The physiography and plant communities of the
Jakkalsrivier Catchment. M. Sc. (Forestry) thesis, University of
Stellenbosch.
Miscellaneous paper, report, unpublished article, tech-
nical note, congress proceedings
ANON, no date. Eetbare plante van die Wolkberg. Botanical Research
Unit, Grahamstown. Unpublished.
BAWDEN, M. G. & CARROL, D. M. 1968. The land resources of
Lesotho. Land Resources Study No. 3, Land Resources Division,
Directorate of Overseas Surveys, Tolworth.
BOUCHER, C. 1981. Contributions of the Botanical Research Insti-
tute. In A. E. F. Heydom, Proceedings of workshop research in
Cape estuaries: 105-107. National Research Institute for Oceano-
logy, CSIR, Stellenbosch.
NATIONAL BUILDING RESEARCH INSTITUTE 1959. Report of
the committee on the protection of building timbers in South
Africa against termites, woodboring beetles and fungi, 2nd edn,
CSIR Research Report No. 169.
TABLES
Each table should be presented on a separate sheet and
be assigned an Arabic numeral, i.e. the first table men-
tioned in the text is marked ‘Table 1’. In the captions of
tables the word ‘table’ is written in capital letters. See
recent numbers of Bothalia for the format required.
Avoid vertical lines, if at all possible. Tables can often
be reduced in width by interchanging primary horizontal
and vertical heads.
FIGURES
General
Figures should be planned to fit, after reduction, into a
width of either 80,118 or 165 mm, with a maximum
vertical length of 240 mm. Allow space for the caption in
the case of figures that will occupy a whole page. It is
recommended that drawings should be twice the size of
the final reproduction. Lettering and numbering on all
figures should be done in letraset, stencilling or a compa-
rable method. If symbols are to be placed on a dark
background it is recommended that black symbols are
used on a small white disk or square. If the lettering or
wording on a figure is to be done by the printer this
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
159
information must be typed or neatly printed on a photo-
copy of the figure or on an overlay attached to the origi-
nal. If several illustrations are treated as components of a
single composite figure they should be designated by
capital letters. Note that the word ‘figure’ should be
written out in full, both in the text and the captions. In
the text the figure reference is then written as in the
following example: ‘The stamens (Figure 4A, B, C) are .
. .’ In captions, ‘figure’ is written in capital letters. Mag-
nification of figures should be given for the size as sub-
mitted. It is recommended, however, that scale bars or
lines be used on figures. In figures accompanying taxo-
nomic papers, voucher specimens should be given in the
relevant caption. Figures are numbered consecutively
with Arabic numerals in the order they are referred to in
the text. These numbers, as well as the author’s name
and an indication of the top of the figure, must be written
in soft pencil on the back of all figures. Authors should
indicate in pencil in the text where they would like the
figures to appear. Authors wishing to have the originals
of figures returned must inform the editor in the original
covering letter and must mark each original ‘To be re-
turned to author’. Authors wishing to use illustrations
already published must obtain written permission before
submitting the manuscript and inform the editor of this
fact. Captions for figures should be collected together
and typed on a separate sheet headed Captions for fig-
ures.
Black and white drawings
Line drawings, including graphs and diagrams, should
be in jet-black Indian ink, preferably on bristol board or
tracing film. Lines should be bold enough to stand reduc-
tion.
Photographs
Photographs should be of excellent quality on glossy
paper with clear detail and moderate contrast. Photo-
graph mosaics should be submitted complete, the com-
ponent photographs mounted neatly on a white card base
leaving a narrow gap of uniform width between each
print. Note that grouping photographs of markedly diver-
gent contrast results in poor reproductions.
Dot maps
It is strongly recommended that taxonomic articles
include dot maps as figures to show the distribution of
taxa. Blank maps are available from the editor.
GENERAL
Names of taxa
As a rule authors should use the names as listed by
Gibbs Russell et al. in Memoirs of the Botanical Survey
of South Africa Nos 48 and 51. Names of genera and
infrageneric taxa are usually underlined with the author
citation (where relevant) not underlined. Exceptions in-
clude names of new taxa in the abstracts, correct names
given in the synopsis or in paragraphs on species ex-
cluded from a given supraspecific group in taxonomic
articles, in checklists and in indices, where the position
is reversed, correct names being not underlined and syn-
onyms underlined. Names above generic level are not
underlined. In articles dealing with taxonomy and close-
ly related subjects the complete scientific name of a plant
(with author citation) should be given at the first mention
in the text. The generic name should be abbreviated to
the initial thereafter, except where intervening references
to other genera with the same initial could cause confu-
sion.
Names of authors of plant names
These should agree with the list compiled by the BRI
(TN TAX 2/1) which has also been implemented by
Gibbs Russell et al. in Memoirs of the Botanical Survey
of South Africa Nos 48 and 51. Modem authors not in-
cluded in the list should use their full name and initials
when publishing new plant names. Other author names
not in the list should be in agreement with the recom-
mendations of the Code.
Names of authors of publications
These are written out in full except in the synonymy in
taxonomic articles where they are treated like names of
authors of plant names.
Names of plant collectors
These are underlined whenever they are linked to the
number of a specimen. The collection number is also
underlined, e.g. Acocks 14407. Surnames beginning
with ‘De’, ‘Du’ or ‘Van’ begin with a capital letter un-
less preceded by an initial.
Measurements
Use only units of the International System of Units
(SI). Cm should not be used, only mm and/or m. The use
of ‘ ± ’ is recommended.
Numerals
Numbers ‘one’ to ‘nine’ are spelled out in normal text
and from 10 onwards they are written in Arabic nume-
rals. In descriptions of plants, numerals are used
throughout. Write 2, 0-4, 5 (not 2-4,5). When counting
members write 2 or 3 (not 2-3).
Abbreviations
Abbreviations should be used sparingly but consis-
tently. No full stops are placed after abbreviations end-
ing with the last letter of the full word (e.g. edition =
edn; editor = ed.), after units of measure, after compass
directions and after herbarium designations.
Herbarium voucher specimens
Wherever possible authors should refer to one or more
voucher specimen(s) in a registered herbarium.
KEYS TO TAXA
It is recommended that (apart from multi-access keys)
indented keys be used with couplets numbered la-lb,
2a-2b, etc. (without full stops thereafter). Keys consist-
ing of a single couplet have no numbering. Manuscripts
of keys should be presented as in the following example:
la Leaves closely arranged on an elongated stem; a submerged aquatic with only the capitu-
la exserted lb. E. setaceum var. pumilum
lb Leaves in basal rosettes; stems suppressed; small marsh plants, ruderals or rarely aqua-
tics:
160
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
2a Annuals, small, fast growing pioneers, dying when the habitat dries up; capitula without
coarse white setae; receptacles cylindrical:
3a Anthers white 2.E. cinereum
3b Anthers black 3. E. nigrum
2b Perennials, more robust plants; capitula sparsely to densely covered with short setae:
SPECIES TREATMENT IN TAXONOMIC PAPERS
General presentation
The procedure to be followed is illustrated in the ex-
ample (under Description and example of species treat-
ment, below), which should be referred to, because not
all steps are described in full detail. The correct name
(see also Names of taxa, under General), with its litera-
ture citations is followed by the synonymy (if any), the
description and the discussion, which should consist of
paragraphs commencing, where possible, with italicised
leader words such as flowering time, diagnostic charac-
ters, distribution and habitat.
Numbering
When more than one species of a given genus is dealt
with in a paper, the correct name of each species should
be prefixed by a sequential number followed by a full
stop, the first line of the paragraph to be indented. Infra-
specific taxa are marked with small letters, e.g. lb.,
12c., etc.
Literature references within synonymy
(See above under Literature references, paragraph 2.)
Citation of specimens
Type specimen in synopsis
The following should be given (if available): country
(if not in RSA), province, locality as given by original
collector, modem equivalent of collecting locality in
square brackets (if relevant), date of collection (optio-
nal), collector’s name and collecting number (both un-
derlined). The abbreviation s.n. (sine numero) is given
after the name of a collector who usually assigned num-
bers to his collections but did not do so in the specimen
in question. The herbaria in which the relevant type(s)
are housed are indicated by means of the abbreviations
given in the latest edition of Index Herbariorum. The
holotype (holo.) and its location are mentioned first,
followed by a semicolon, the other herbaria are arranged
alphabetically, separated by commas. Authors should
indicate by means of an exclamation mark (!) which of
the types have been personally examined. If only a pho-
tograph or microfiche was seen, write as follows: Anon.
422 (Z, holo.-BOL, photo.!). Lectotypes or neotypes
should be chosen for correct names without a holotype.
It is not necessary to lectotypify synonyms. When a
lecto- or a neotype are newly chosen this should be indi-
cated by using the phrase ‘here designated’. If reference
is made to a previously selected lectotype or neotype, the
name of the designating author and the literature refer-
ence should be given. In cases where no type was cited,
and none has subsequently been nominated, this may be
stated as ‘not designated’.
In notes and brief taxonomic articles
In brief papers mentioning only a few species and a
few cited specimens, the specimens should be arranged
according to the grid reference system:
Provinces/countries (typed in capitals) should be cited
in the following order: SWA/Namibia, Botswana, Trans-
vaal, Orange Free State, Swaziland, Natal, Lesotho,
Transkei and Cape. Grid references should be cited in
numerical sequence. Locality records for specimens
should preferably be given to within a quarter-degree
square. Records from the same one-degree square are
given in alphabetical order, i.e. (-AC) precedes (-AD),
etc. Records from the same quarter-degree square are
arranged alphabetically according to the collectors ’s
names; the quarter degree references must be repeated
for each specimen cited. The relevant international code
of the herbaria in which a collection was seen should be
given in brackets after the collection number; the codes
are separated by commas. The following example will
explain the procedure:
NATAL. — 2731 (Louwsburg): 16 km E of Nongoma (-DD), Pelser
354 (BM, K, PRE); near Dwarsrand, Van der Merwe 4789 (BOL, M).
2829 (Harrismith): near Groothoek (-AB), Smith 234\ Koffiefontein
(-AB), Taylor 720 (PRE); Cathedral Peak Forest Station (-CC), Mar-
riot 74 (KMG); Wilgerfontein, Roux 426. Grid ref. unknown: Sterk-
stroom, Strydom 12 (NBG).
For records from outside southern Africa authors
should use degree squares without names, e.g.:
KENYA. — 0136: Nairobi plains beyond race course, Napier 485.
If long lists of specimens are given, they should be
dealt with as below.
In monographs and revisions
In the case of all major works of this nature it is as-
sumed that the author has investigated the relevant mate-
rial in all major herbaria and that he has provided the
specimens seen with determinavit labels. It is assumed
further that the author has submitted distribution maps
for all relevant taxa and that the distribution has been
described briefly in words in the text. Under the heading
‘Vouchers’ no more than 5 specimens should be cited,
indicating merely the collector and the collector’s
number (both underlined). Specimens are alphabetically
arranged according to collector’s name. If more than one
specimen by the same collector is cited, they are ar-
ranged numerically and separated by a semicolon. The
purpose of the cited specimens is not to indicate distribu-
tion but to convey the author’s concept of the taxon in
question.
The herbaria in which the specimens are housed are
indicated by means of the abbreviation given in the latest
edition of Index Herbariorum. They are given between
brackets, arranged alphabetically and separated by com-
mas behind every specimen as in the following example:
Vouchers: Fischer 840 (NH, NU, PRE); Flanagan 831 (GRA,
PRE); Marloth 4926 (PRE, STE); Schelpe 6161 (BOL); Schlechter
4451 (BM, BOL, GRA, K, PRE).
All specimens studied by the author should be listed
together at the end of the article under the heading Speci-
mens examined. They are arranged alphabetically by the
collector’s name and then numerically for each collector.
The species is indicated in brackets by the number that
was assigned to it in the text and any infraspecific taxa
by a small letter. If more than one genus is dealt with in a
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
161
given article, the first species of the first genus men-
tioned is indicated as 1.1. This is followed by the inter-
national herbarium designation. Note that the name of
the collector and the collection number are underlined:
Acocks 12497 (21b) BM, K, PRE; 14724 (1.13a) BOL, K, P. Archer
1507 (4) BM,G.
Burchell 2847 (8c) BM, K. Burman 2401 (3) MO, S. Burtt 789 (2.6)
B, KMG, STE.
Synonyms
In a monograph or a revision covering all of southern
Africa, all synonyms based on types of southern African
origin, or used in southern African literature, should be
included. Illegitimate names are designated by nom.
illeg. after the reference, followed by non with the au-
thor and date, if there is an earlier homonym. Nomina
nuda (nom. nud.) and invalid names are excluded unless
there is a special reason to cite them, for example if they
have been used in prominent publications. Note that in
normal text Latin words are italicized, but in the synop-
sis of a species Latin words such as nom. nud. are not
italicized.
Synonyms should be arranged chronologically into
groups of nomenclatural synonyms, i.e. synonyms based
on the same type, and the groups should be arranged
chronologically by basionyms, except for the basionym
of the correct name which is dealt with in the paragraph
directly after that of the correct name. When a generic
name is repeated in a given synonymy it should be abbre-
viated to the inital except where intervening references to
other genera with the same initial could cause confusion.
Description and example of species treatment
Descriptions of all taxa of higher plants should, where
possible, follow the sequence: Habit; sexuality; under-
ground parts (if relevant). Indumentum (if it can be easily
described for the whole plant). Stems/branches. Bark.
Leaves : arrangement, petiole absent/present, pubes-
cence; blade: shape, size, apex, base, margin; midrib:
above/below, texture, colour; petiole; stipules. Inflores-
cence: type, shape, position; bracts/bracteoles. Flowers:
shape, sex. Receptacle. Calyx. Corolla. Disc. Androe-
cium. Gynoecium. Fruit. Seeds. Chromosome number.
Figure (word written out in full) number. As a rule shape
should be given before measurements. In general, if an
organ has more than one of the parts being described, use
the plural, otherwise use the singular, for example, pe-
tals of a flower but blade of a leaf. Language must be as
concise as possible, using participles instead of verbs.
Dimension ranges should be cited as in the example be-
low. Care must be exercised in the use of dashes and
hyphens: a hyphen is a short stroke joining two syllables
of a word, e.g. ovate-lanceolate or sea-green; an N-dash
(en) is a longer stroke commonly used instead of the
word ‘to’ between numerals, ‘2-5 mm long’ (do not use
it between words but rather use the word ‘to’, e.g. ‘ovate
to lanceolate’), it is produced on a typewriter by typing 2
hyphens next to each other; and an M-dash (em) is a
stroke longer than an N-dash and is used variously, e.g.
in front of a subspecific epithet instead of the full species
name, it is produced on a typewriter by typing 3 hyphens
next to one another. The use of ‘±’ is recommended
when describing shape, measurements, dimensions etc.
Example:
1. Bequaertiodendron magalismontanum (Sond.) Heine &
Hemsl. in Kew Bulletin: 307 (1960); Codd: 72 (1964); Elsdon: 75
(1980). Type: Transvaal, Magaliesberg, Zeyher 1849 (S, holo. -BOL,
photo.!)
Chrysophyllum magalismontanum Sond.: 721 (1850); Harv.: 812
(1867); Engl.: 434 (1904); Bottmar: 34 (1919). Zeyherella magalis-
montanum (Sond.) Aubrev. & Pelegr.: 105 (1958); Justin: (1973).
Chrysophyllum argyrophyllum Hiem: 721 (1850); Engl.: 43 (1904).
Boivinella argyrophylla (Hiem) Aubrev. & Pellegr.: 37 (1958); Justin:
98 (1973). Types: Angola, Welwitsch 4828 (BM!, lecto., here desig-
nated; PRE!); Angola, Welwitsch 4872 (BM!).
Chrysophyllum wilmsii Engl.: 4, t. 16 (1904); Masonet: 77 (1923);
Woodson: 244 (1937). Boivinella wilmsii (Engl.) Aubrev. & Pellegr.:
39 (1958); Justin: 99 (1973). Type: Transvaal, Magoebaskloof, Wilms
1812 (B, holo.; K!, P!, lecto, designated by Aubrev. & Pellegr.: 38
(1958), PRE!, S! W!, Z!).
Bequaertiodendron fruticosa De Wild.: 37 (1923), non Bonpland:
590 (1823); Bakker: 167 (1929); Fries: 302 (1938); Davy: 640 (1954);
Breytenbach: 117 (1959); Clausen: 720 (1968); Palmer: 34 (1969).
Type: Transvaal, Tzaneen Distr., Granville 3665 (K, holo.!; G! , P!,
PRE!, S!).
Bequaertiodendron fragrans auct. non Oldemann: Glover: 149, t. 19
(1915); Henkel: 226 (1934); Stapelton: 6 (1954).
leones: Harv.: 812 (1867); Henkel: t. 84 (1934); Codd: 73 (1964);
Palmer: 35 (1969).
Woody perennial; main branches up to 0,4 m long,
erect or decumbent, grey woolly-felted, leafy. Leaves
3-10 (-23) x 1,0-1, 5 (-4,0) mm, linear to oblanceolate,
obtuse, base broad, half-clasping. Heads heterogamous,
campanulate, 7-8 x 5 mm, solitary, sessile at tip of
axillary shoots; involucral bracts in 5 or 6 series, inner
exceeding flowers, tips subopaque, white, very acute.
Receptacle nearly smooth. Flowers ± 23-30, 7-11
male, 16-21 bisexual, yellow, tipped pink. Achenes ±
0,75 mm long, elliptic. Pappus bristles very many,
equalling corolla, scabridulous. Chromosome number:
2n = 22. Figure 23B.
New taxa
The name of a new taxon must be accompanied by at
least a Latin diagnosis. Authors should not provide full-
length Latin descriptions unless they have the required
expertise in Latin at their disposal. It is recommended
that descriptions of new taxa be accompanied by a good
illustration (line drawing or photograph) and a distribu-
tion map.
Example:
109. Helichrysum jubilatum Hilliard, sp. nov. H.
alsinoidei DC. affinis, sed foliis ellipticis (nec spatula-
tis), inflorescentiis compositis a foliis non circumcinctis,
floribus femineis numero quasi dimidium hermaphrodi-
torum aequantibus (nec capitulis homogamis vel floribus
femineis 1-3 tantum) distinguitur.
Herba annua e basi ramosa; caules erecti vel decum-
bentes, 100-250 mm longi, tenuiter albo-lanati, remote
foliati. Folia plerumque 8-30 x 5-15 mm, sub capitulis
minora, elliptica vel oblanceolata, obtusa vel acuta, mu-
cronata, basi semi-amplexicauli, utrinque cano-lanato-
arachnoidea. Capitula heterogama, campanulata,
3, 5^1,0 x 2,5 mm, pro parte maxima in paniculas cy-
mosas terminales aggregata; capitula subterminalia inter-
dum solitaria vel 2-3 ad apices ramulorum nudorum ad
30 mm longorum. Bracteae involucrales 5-seriatae, gra-
datae, exteriores pellucidae, pallide stramineae, dorso
lanatae, seriebus duabus interioribus subaequalibus et
flores quasi aequantibus, apicibus obtusis opacis niveis
vix radiantibus. Receptaculum fere laeve. Flores ±
35^4 1 . Achenia 0,75 mm longa, pilis myxogenis prae-
dita. Pappi setae multae, corollam aequantes, apicibus
scabridis, basibus non cohaerentibus.
162
Bothalia 17,1 (1987)
TYPE. — Cape, Namaqualand Division, Richtersveld,
± 5 miles E of Lekkersing on road to Stinkfontein, kloof
in hill south of the road, annual, disc whitish, 7 xi 1962,
Nordenstam 1823 (S, holo.; E, NH, PRE).
PROOFS
Only galley proofs are normally sent to authors. They
should be corrected in red ink and be returned to the
editor as soon as possible.
REPRINTS
Authors receive 100 reprints gratis. If there is more
than one author, this number will have to be shared be-
tween them.
DOCUMENTS CONSULTED
Guides to authors of the following publications were
made use of in the compilation of the present guide:
Annals of the Missouri Botanic Garden, Botanical Jour-
nal of the Linnean Society, Bothalia, Flora of Australia,
Smithsonian Contributions to Botany, South African
Journal of Botany (including instructions to authors of
taxonomic papers), South African Journal of Science.
ADDRESS OF EDITOR
Manuscripts should be submitted to: The Editor,
Bothalia, Botanical Research Institute, Private Bag
X101, Pretoria 0001.
BOTHALIA
Volume 17,1
July/Julie 1987
CONTENTS— INHOUD
1 . The Indigofera filifolia complex (Fabaceae) in southern Africa. J. K. JAR VIE and C. H. STIRTON 1
2. A synopsis of Tephrosia subgenus Barbistyla (Fabaceae) in southern Africa. B. D. SCHRIRE 7
3 . A new species and a new combination of Asclepias (Asclepiadaceae) in southern Africa. A. NICHOLAS ... 17
4. Two new brown subcrustose Parmelia species from southern Africa (lichenized Ascomycetes).
F. BRUSSE 25
5 . Notes on African plants:
Asclepiadaceae. Notes on Asclepias diploglossa, A. cognata mdA.flava. A. NICHOLAS 29
Erysiphaceae. Two new Oidium species from the Transvaal. G. J. M. A. GORTER and A. EICKER. . . 32
Fabaceae. A new species of Indigofera from Natal and Transkei. G. GERMISHUIZEN 33
Lichinaceae. A new species of Gonohymenia from Etosha Pan limestone. F. BRUSSE 35
Lichinaceae. A new species of Thyrea from Otavi dolomite (Damara System). F. BRUSSE 37
Polygonaceae. A new species of Oxygonum from Natal. G. GERMISHUIZEN 40
Teloschistaceae. A new species of Caloplaca from southern Africa. I. KARNEFELT 41
6. Cetraria (Parmeliaceae) and some related genera on the African continent. I. KARNEFELT 45
7. Species groups in the genus Ehrharta (Poaceae) in southern Africa. G. E. GIBBS RUSSELL and
R. P. ELLIS 51
8. Taxonomy of the genus Ehrharta (Poaceae) in southern Africa: the Setacea group. G. E. GIBBS
RUSSELL 67
9. Leaf anatomy of the genus Ehrharta (Poaceae) in southern Africa: the Setacea group. R. P. ELLIS 75
10. Six cultivars of Solanum macrocarpon (Solanaceae) in Ghana. Z. R. BUKENYA and J. B. HALL 91
11. Bibliography of Fusarium (Fungi: Hyphomycetes) in South Africa, 1945-1985. W. F. O. MARASAS,
SANDRA C. LAMPRECHT, P. S. VAN WYK and R. Y. ANELICH 97
12. The genus Rubus (Rosaceae) in South Africa. IV. Natural hybridization. J. J. SPIES, C. H. STIRTON and
H. DU PLESSIS 105
13. Ordination by detrended correspondence analysis (DC A) of the vegetation of Swartboschkloof,
Jonkershoek, Cape Province. D. J. MCDONALD 121
14. Miscellaneous notes:
Chromosome studies on African plants. 3. J. J. SPIES and H. DU PLESSIS 131
Chromosome studies on African plants. 4. J. J. SPIES and A. JONKER 135
Performance of a laboratory-constructed anemometer under summer field conditions on a Mountain
Fynbos experimental site. G. W. DAVIS 136
15. Review of the work of the Botanical Research Institute, 1985/1986 139
16. Book reviews 155
1 7 . Guide for authors to Bothalia 157
Abstracted, indexed or listed in Biological Abstracts, Current Advances in Plant Science, Current Contents, Field Crop Abstracts, Forestry
Abstracts, Herbage Abstracts, Excerpta Botanica, Revue of Plant Pathology, Revue of Medical and Veterinary Mycology and The Kew Record of
Taxonomic Literature.
An index to contents, authors and subjects is published separately for each volume to facilitate access to the information provided.
ISSN 0006 8241 PRICE R 10,00 (GST excl.)
© and published by Botanical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and Water Supply, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.
Printed by The Government Printer, Bosman Street, Pretoria, and obtainable from the Division of Agricultural Information, Department of Agricul-
ture and Water Supply, Private Bag X144, Pretoria 0001 , South Africa.