ISSN 0006 8241 = Botha! ia
Bothalia
’N TYDSKRIF VIR PLANTKUNDIGE NAVORSING
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Vol. 18,1 May/Mei 1988
BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE • DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND WATER SUPPLY • REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
NAVORSINGSINSTITUUT VIR PLANTKUNDE • DEPARTEMENT VAN LANDBOU EN WATERVOORSIENING • REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA
PUBLICATIONS OF THE BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
PUBLIKASIES VAN DIE NAVORSINGSINSTITUUT VIR PLANTKUNDE
Obtainable from the Division of Agricultural Information, De-
partment of Agriculture and Water Supply, Private Bag X144,
Pretoria 0001, Republic of South Africa. A current price list of
all available publications will be issued on request.
BOTHALIA
Bothalia is named in honour of General Louis Botha, first Premier
and Minister of Agriculture of the Union of South Africa. This
fmuse journal of the Botanical Research Institute is devoted to
the furtherance of botanical science. The main fields covered
are taxonomy, ecology, anatomy and cytology. Two parts of the
journal and an index to contents, authors and subjects are publish-
ed annually.
Verkrygbaar van die Afdeling Landbou-inligting, Departement
van Landbou en Watervoorsiening, Privaatsak X144, Pretoria
0001, Republiek van Suid-Afrika. ’n Geldige lys van alle beskik-
bare publikasies kan aangevra word.
Bothalia is vernoem ter ere van Generaal Louis Botha, eerste Eerste
Minister en Minister van Landbou van die Unie van Suid-Afrika
Hierdie lyfblad van die Navorsingsinstituut vir Plantkunde is gewy
aan die bevordering van die wetenskap van plantkunde. Die hoof-
gebiede wat gedek word, is taksonomie, ekologie, anatomie en
sitologie. Twee dele van die tydskrif en ’n indeks van die inhoud,
outeurs en onderwerpe verskyn jaarliks.
MEMOIRS OF THE BOTANICAL SURVEY OF SOUTH AFRICA
MEMOIRS VAN DIE BOTANIESE OPNAME VAN SUID-AFRIKA
The memoirs are individual treatises usually of an ecological ’n Reeks van losstaande omvattende verhandelings oor vemaam-
nature, but sometimes dealing with taxonomy or economic lik ekologiese, maar soms ook taksonomiese of plantekonomiese
botany. onderwerpe.
THE FLOWERING PLANTS OF AFRICA / DIE BLOMPLANTE VAN AFRIKA
This serial presents colour plates of African plants with ac-
companying text. The plates are prepared mainly by the artists
at the Botanical Research Institute. Many well known botanical
artists have contributed to the series, such as Cythna Letty (over
700 plates), Kathleen Lansdell, Stella Gower, Betty Connell,
Peter Bally and Fay Anderson. The Editor is pleased to receive
living plants of general interest or of economic value for
illustration.
Two parts of ten plates each are published annually. A volume
consists of four parts. The publication is available in English and
Afrikaans.
Hierdie reeks bied kleurplate van Afrikaanse plante met bygaan-
de teks. Die skilderye word meestal deur die kunstenaars van die
Navorsingsinstituut vir Plantkunde voorberei. Talle bekende bota-
niese kunstenaars het tot die reeks bygedra, soos Cythna Letty
(mcer as 700 plate), Kathleen Lansdell, Stella Gower, Betty Con-
nell, Peter Bally en Fay Anderson. Die Redakteur verwelkom
lewende plante van algemene belang of ekonomicse waarde vir
afbeelding.
Twee dele, elk met tien plate, word jaarliks gepubliseer. ’n Volume
bestaan uit vier dele. Die publikasie is beskikbaar in Afrikaans en
Engels.
FLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA / FLORA VAN SUIDELIKE AFRIKA
A taxonomic treatise on the flora of the Republic of South Africa,
Ciskei, Transkei, Lesotho, Swaziland, Bophuthatswana, South
West Africa/Namibia, Botswana and Venda. The FSA contains
descriptions of families, genera species, infraspecific taxa, keys
to genera and species, synonymy, literature and limited specimen
citations, as well as taxonomic and ecological notes. Also available
in the FSA series are the following:
’n Taksonomiese verhandeling oor die flora van die Republiek
van Suid-Afrika Ciskei, Transkei, Lesotho, Swaziland, Bophu-
thatswana, SWA/Namibie, Botswana en Venda. Die FSA bevat
beskry wings van families, genusse, spesies, infraspesifieke taksons,
sleutels tot genusse en spesies, sinonimie, literatuur, verwysings
na enkele eksemplare, asook beknopte taksonomiese en ekologiese
aantekeninge. Ook beskikbaar in die FSA-reeks is die volgende:
The genera of southern African flowering plants by/deur R.A. Dyer, Vol. 1 Dicotyledons (1975); Vol. 2
Monocotyledons (1976).
Keys to families and index to the genera of southern African flowering plants by/deur R.A. Dyer (1977).
Plant exploration of southern Africa by Mary Gunn & L.E. Codd. Obtainable from/Beskikbaar van:
A. A. Balkema Marketing, Box/Posbus 317, Claremont 7735, RSA.
PALAEOFLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA / PALAEOFLORA VAN SUIDELIKE AFRIKA.
A palaeoflora on a pattern comparable to that of the Flora of
southern Africa. Much of the information is presented in the
form of tables and photographic plates depicting fossil popula-
tions. Now available:
’n Palaeoflora met ’n uitleg vergelykbaar met die van die Flora
van suidelike Afrika. Baie van die inligting word aangebied in die
vorm van tabelle en fotografiese plate waarop fossiele populasies
afgebeeld word. Reeds beskikbaar:
Molteno Formation (Triassic) Vol. 1 Introduction. Dicroidium by/deur J.M. & H.M. Anderson.
Prodromus of South African Megafloras. Devonian to Lower Cretaceous by/deur J.M. & H.M. Anderson.
Obtainable from/Beskikbaar van: A. A. Balkema Marketing, Box/Posbus 317, Claremont 7735, RSA.
Republic of
South Africa
Republiek van
Suid-Afrika
BOTHALIA
’N TYDSKRIF VIR PLANTKUNDIGE NAVORSING
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Volume 18,1
Editor/Redakteur: O. A. Leistner
Assisted by B. A. Momberg
Editorial Board/Redaksieraad
D. F. Cutler
B. de Winter
P. H. Raven
J. P. Rourke
M. J. Werger
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK
Botanical Research Institute, Pretoria, RSA
Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, USA
National Botanic Gardens, Kirstenbosch, RSA
University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Editorial Committee/Redaksiekomitee
B. de Winter
D. J. B. Killick
O. A. Leistner
B. A. Momberg
M, C. Rutherford
J.C. Scheepers
ISSN 0006 8241
Issued by the Botanical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and Water Supply. Private Bag X101 , Pretoria 0001
South Africa
IJiteeeee deur die Navorsingsinstituut vir Plantkunde, Departement van Landbou en Watervoorsiening, Privaatsak X101
Pretoria 000 1 , Suid-Afrika
1988
'
This volume is dedicated to
ROBERT ALLEN DYER
1900-1987
CONTENTS — INHOUD
Volume 18,1
1. Studies in die Ericoideae (Ericaceae). VI. The generic relationship between Erica and Philippia in
southern Africa. E. G. H. OLIVER 1
2. A synopsis of the tribe Desmodieae (Fabaceae) in southern Africa. B. D. SCHRIRE 11
3. The naturalized species of Lupinus (Fabaceae) in southern Africa. C. H. STIRTON 25
4. Studies in the genus Lotononis (Crotalarieae, Fabaceae). 1 . Three new species of the section Aulacinthus
from the Cape Province. B-E. VAN WYK 31
5. Studies in the genus Riccia (Marchantiales) from southern Africa. 8. R. campbelliana (subgenus Riccia),
newly recorded for the region. S. M. PEROLD and O. H. VOLK 37
6. Studies in the genus Riccia (Marchantiales) from southern Africa. 9. R. nigrella and the status of R.
capensis. S. M. PEROLD and O. H. VOLK 43
7. Two closely related species of Caloplaca (Teloschistaceae, Lichenes) from the Namib Desert. I. KARNE-
FELT 51
8. The Cheilanthes hirta complex and allied species (Adiantaceae/Pteridaceae) in southern Africa. W. B. G.
JACOBSEN and N.H.G. JACOBSEN 57
9. Solarium (Solanaceae) in Ghana. Z. R. BUKENYA and J. B. HALL 79
10. Notes on African plants:
Acarosporaceae. Lithoglypha, a new lichen genus from Clarens Sandstone. F. BRUSSE 89
Adiantaceae/Pteridaceae. Doryopteris pilosa, a new record from South Africa. W. B. G. JACOB-
SEN and N. H. G. JACOBSEN 90
Lamiaceae. Resuscitation of Syncolostemon ramulosus E. Mey. ex Benth. L. E. CODD 92
Porpidiaceae. A new species of Porpidia from the Drakensberg. F. BRUSSE 93
Porpidiaceae? Schizodiscus, a new porpidioid lichen genus from the Drakensberg. F. BRUSSE 94
11. The cigarette beetle Lasioderma serricorne (F.) (Coleoptera: Anobiidae): a serious herbarium pest.
E. RETIEF and A. NICHOLAS 97
12. Leaf anatomy of the South African Danthonieae (Poaceae). XVI. The genus Urochlaena. R. P. ELLIS .... 101
13. Ecology and population biology of Euphorbia perangusta (Euphorbiaceae) in the Transvaal, South Africa.
P. A. RAAL 105
14. Miscellaneous notes:
Chromosome studies on African plants. 6. J. J. SPIES and H. DU PLESSIS 1 1 1
Chromosome studies on African plants. 7. J. J. SPIES and S. P. VOGES 114
Chromosome studies on African plants. 8. H. DU PLESSIS and J. J. SPIES 119
New programs for preliminary sequencing of releves and species in phytosociological data sets. R. H.
WESTFALL and B. C. DE WET 122
15. The identification of ‘Isicakathi’ and its medicinal use in Transkei. R. N. BOLOFO and C. T. JOHNSON 125
16. Obituary: Robert Allen Dyer (1900 -1987). L. E. CODD 131
17. Book reviews 135
1 8 . Guide for authors to Bothal ia 137
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2016
https://archive.org/details/bothaliavolume1818unse
Bothalia 18,1: 1-10(1988)
Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae). VI. The generic relationship
between Erica and Philippia in southern Africa
E. G. H. OLIVER*
Keywords: Africa, bract, bracteoles. Erica, Ericaceae, Ericoideae, Philippia, poly phy lesis , recaulescence, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
Problems in placing certain species satisfactorily in Philippia or Erica have led to an investigation of characters
delimiting the genera mainly in southern African species. The only character used in placing problem species was partial
versus total recaulescence of the bract. This separation breaks down completely in a few species in which ericoid and
philippioid flowers occur within the same inflorescence. Not all species of Philippia are closely related, some being more
closely related to various sections within Erica. It is evident that Philippia is an unnatural polyphy letic group It is
concluded that Philippia should be placed in synonymy under Erica.
UITTREKSEL
Probleme met die bevredigende plasing van sekere spesies in Philippia of Erica het gelei tot 'n ondersoek na die
kenmerke wat die genusse hoofsaaklik by spesies in suidelike Afrika omgrens. Die enigste kenmerk wat gebruik is om
probleemspesies te plaas, is gedeeltelike teenoor totale rekaulesens van die skutblaar. By ’n paar spesies met erikoiede en
philippioiede blomme in dieselfde bloeiwyse, verval hierdie onderskeid egter heeltemal. Nie alle spesies van Philippia is
naverwant nie; sommiges is nader verwant aan verskeie seksies van Erica. Philippia word beskou as ’n onnatuurlike
polifiletiese groep. Daar word voorgestel dat Philippia onder Erica in sinonimie geplaas word.
CONTENTS
Introduction 1
Morphology 2
Analysis 6
Philippia 6
Erica 6
Species outside southern Africa 8
Phylogeny of the genus Philippia 8
Conclusions 9
Acknowledgements 9
References 9
INTRODUCTION
Philippia is a widespread genus of ± 65 species native
to Africa and the Madagascan region. Erica occurs from
the Cape to northern Europe and consists of ± 660 spe-
cies, 98 % of which occur in the Cape. Work in progress
on the genera of the subfamily Ericoideae for the Flora
of southern Africa has revealed problems of generic deli-
mitation within this highly diversified group of approxi-
mately 800 species. One such problem area lies between
the extremely large genus Erica and the small genus
Philippia , with 636 and 15 species respectively within
the southern African region.
The genus Philippia was described by Klotzsch (1834)
who distinguished it from Erica on the possession of an
unequal calyx. Ever since then the genus has been uni-
versally upheld. Philippia is a pan- African genus of
* Botanical Research Unit, P.O. Box 471, Stellenbosch 7600.
MS. received; 1987.08.17
some 65 species with the majority (± 40 species) occur-
ring on Madagascar (Figure 1 ).
Erica is distinguished from Philippia by having a
single bract, two bracteoles and a calyx consisting of
four more or less equal segments or lobes. This applies
to the vast majority of the ± 660 species in the genus.
Philippia, on the other hand, is generally described as
having ‘no bract nor bracteoles and a zygomorphic 4-
partite or 4-lobed calyx’, a condition found in most of
the species in the genus.
The first indication of any problems regarding the dis-
tinction between Philippia and Erica was given by Aim
& Fries (1927a: 8) in the only complete revision of the
genus Philippia. They noted ‘In der Tat finden wir bei
der Gattung Erica noch derartige Ubergangsformen',
and further on (p. 36) ‘Diese beiden Arten [i.e. P. ken-
iensis S. Moore and P. jaegeri Engl.] stellen darum fast
Ubergangstypen zwischen den Gattungen Philippia und
Erica dar.’. Nevertheless, in this revision and the revi-
sion of the genus Erica in tropical Africa (Aim & Fries
1927b) they retained both genera. No problems were
recorded in distinguishing Philippia from Erica in
southern Africa until the present revisionary work during
which species were carefully examined and evolutionary
relationships were sought within Erica. Investigations
have revealed a complete series of intermediates within a
few species.
In the African Ericoideae only Erica, Philippia, Blae-
ria L. and Ericinella Klotzsch possess a multiseeded
dehiscent capsule. The genus Philippia seems likely to
have evolved from ancestral stock related to Erica sec-
tion Arsace (Aim & Fries 1927a; Pichi-Sermolli & Hei-
niger 1953), and the majority of species in southern
Africa are related to this section. However, two species,
P. stokoei and P. pallida, are clearly allied to Erica
species in other sections.
2
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
FIGURE 1 . — Maps showing the approximate distribution of the genera Erica , left, and Philippia, right.
MORPHOLOGY
Aim & Fries (1927a) pointed out that in Erica and
Philippia the bract is recaulescent on the pedicel (Figure
2). This is a well known occurrence in the Angiospermae
(Weberling 1981: 228). However, Aim & Fries postu-
lated that the bract fused with the abaxial sepal — ‘Wir
halten es fur sehr wahrscheinlich . . . [dass] die unpaa-
rige untere Bractee . . . mit dem vorderen Kelchblatte
verschmolzen fist]’ (their floral diagram, 3.c, clearly
shows this feature). They continued ‘Denkbar, aber sehr
unwahrscheinlich ist, dass das vordere Kelchblatt
vollstandig reduziert worden ist.’. Pichi-Sermolli & Hei-
niger (1953: 35), on the other hand, referred to the recau-
lescent bract as the fourth calyx segment, which in Phi-
lippia is replaced by the bract which has undergone a
‘phyletic slide’ upwards and has become part of the ca-
lyx. Ross (1957: 735) found clear evidence that in Phi-
lippia at least, the zygomorphic calyx has arisen by the
migration of bracts up the pedicel, followed by their
fusion with the calyx, but he did not give any evidence to
support his view of fusion. Friedmann (1981: 6) held the
same opinion as Pichi-Sermolli & Heiniger in his revi-
sion of the Ericaceae in the Flore des Mascareignes hav-
ing found that some abnormal flowers in P. abietina
Klotzsch show transitions indicating that the major sepal
is in fact the modified floral bract and later on (p. 8) Me
sepale destine a etre remplace par la bractee a deja re-
gresse totalement’.
I would support the opinion of Pichi-Sermolli & Hei-
niger and of Friedmann that the totally recaulescent bract
does suppress the abaxial sepal and takes over its posi-
tion and ‘function’. No anatomical investigations have
been carried out to support this view but I have observed
morphological variation which suggests it, particularly
in E. peltata Andr. in which there may sometimes be a
thin, hair-like abaxial sepal on the inside of the recaules-
cent bract (Figure 5.4). A similar situation was noted by
Pichi-Sermolli & Heiniger in their P. abyssinica. In
another genus, Coilostigma (C. glabrum Benth.), va-
rious stages in reduction of the abaxial sepal are often
ericoid
ericoid/philippioid
intermediate
rB4, Obr
philippioid
FIGURE 2. — Series of diagrams
showing stages in the recaules-
cence of the bract up the pedicel
in the Ericoideae from axial on
the left to totally recaulescent on
the right (formulae represent
each stage and are explained in
the text).
aB , 2 br
rB2 , 2 br 3
rB4, 2 br5
RB , 0 br
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
3
FIGURE 3. — Diagrams showing the
arrangement within an inflores-
cence of, left: typical ericoid
flowers; right: typical philip-
pioid flowers and, centre: the
intermediate form occurring fre-
quently in E. ebracteata and E.
peltata (formulae represent the
bract and bracteole arrangement
in each whorl as explained in the
text).
ericoid
philippioid
clearly visible. In its calyx, this is the most variable
species in the subfamily as it often has the adaxial sepal
reduced as well (Oliver 1987a).
Additional evidence to support this opinion was noted
by Pichi-Sermolli & Heiniger (1953: 35) in their P. abys-
sinica, which they stated exhibits a very characteristic
dimorphism of the calyx. The peripheral flowers of an
inflorescence have a regular calyx and a single foliar
bract lower down on the pedicel whereas the central or
upper flowers have a zygomorphic calyx with a totally
recaulescent bract. There is thus a complete gradation
series in the recaulescence of the bract within a single
inflorescence. I have found this gradation occurring in a
number of inflorescences of E. ebracteata H. Bol. from
the Natal Drakensberg, of E. peltata from the southern
Cape Province (Figure 3) and frequently in Coilostigma
glabrum (Oliver 1987a).
It has always been stated that, when the bract is totally
recaulescent, the two bracteoles (prophylls) are missing
or absent. Nobody has queried this statement or dis-
cussed the fate of these two organs. In my investigations
of E. peltata I have come to the conclusion that the
bracteoles do not disappear but also become part of the
calyx. A paper on the fate of the bracteoles is in prepara-
tion (Oliver in prep. b).
In the typical philippioid condition the bract is fully
recaulescent up the pedicel, totally suppressing the ab-
axial sepal and fusing with the calyx, in some cases to
such an extent that it is difficult to distinguish it as not
being a sepal, as in P. simii H. Bol., P. irrorata E. G.
H. Oliver and P. procaviana E. G. H. Oliver
(Figure 4. 1-4.3). Ross (1957: 738), however, stated
that in the east African species with flowers of the philip-
pioid type, the bract-like calyx lobe is always free to the
base and never fused with the others. He added that it is
never inserted at the same level as the other segments but
is always at least slightly lower. This occurs in the sou-
thern African P. stokoei L. Guthrie, P. drakensbergensis
E. G. H. Oliver, P. pallida L. Guthrie and P. alticola E.
G. H. Oliver (Figure 4. 4-4. 7). On the other hand, the
bract is often slightly to considerably larger than the
other lobes of the calyx resulting in an unequal or zygo-
morphic calyx (Figure 5.1— 5.3, P. evansii N.E. Br.).
This condition is found in a number of genera in the
Ericoideae other than Philippia : Ericinella , the Salaxis
Salisb .-Coccosperma K\otzsch-Scyphogyne Brongn.
complex, Coilostigma Klotzsch and the unique monoty-
pic Nagelocarpus Bullock. Except for the single species
Ericinella microdonta (C.H. Wr.) Aim & Fries, these
genera are all Cape endemics.
It is therefore clear that the abaxial ‘sepal’, which is
often enlarged and separate from the rest of the calyx in
the species of Philippia and also of Ericinella, Coilo-
stigma, Salaxis, Coccosperma, Scyphogyne and Nagelo-
carpus, is homologous with the bract in Erica. The bract
thus exhibits three character states: nonrecaulescent
(axial), partially recaulescent and totally recaulescent.
In the distinction between Philippia and Erica, Aim &
Fries (1927a: 36) made use only of the actinomorphic
versus zygomorphic calyx and glossed over those species
that have some flowers with the intermediate condition.
Phillips (1944) re-examined the Ericaceae for the revi-
sion of his The genera of South African flowering plants
(1951) and came to the conclusion that not more than
eight genera could be justified. He sank numerous ge-
nera into what I regard as heterogeneous assemblages.
Philippia was combined with Blaeria and Ericinella, a
very valid step, but was kept separate from Erica,
whereas Thamnus and Coccosperma were included
solely on the basis of ovary and stamen complement.
The last two are, however, very distinct unrelated genera
with indehiscent fruits. Phillips did not consider there to
be any close relationship between Erica and Philippia.
His work was never seriously considered by subsequent
workers and was not taken up in herbaria.
Ross (1957), in preparing the account for the Flora of
tropical east Africa, published some detailed notes on
the genus Philippia in which he not only dealt with the
taxonomic problems of species restricted to that area, but
he also considered generic limits within the whole tribe.
He pointed out several problems, but under the section
dealing with the concept of the genus he did not discuss
the relationship of Philippia and Erica. He retained them
as distinct genera and in his key gave the following dif-
ferentiating characters:
4
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
FIGURE 4. — Flowers of Philippia showing the bract (on left hand side of each flower) totally recaulescent and fused to lateral sepals in 1,
P. simir, 2, P. irrorata; 3, P. procaviana\ showing the bract (on left hand side of each flower) almost totally recaulescent and free from
lateral sepals in 4, P. stokoei\ 5, P. drakensbergensis ; 6, P. pallida ; 7, P. alticola, all drawn x 20 from type material (BOL, STE).
‘Pedicels with one or more bracts and calyx actinomorphic in
all flowers Erica
Pedicel without bracts and calyx with one sepal larger than the
others in many or all flowers Philippia ’
However, he did mention the problem of the placing
of certain specimens of P. trimera Engl, and P. keniensis
S. Moore which exhibit variation in the bract/calyx
relationship (see later in this article).
For the species occurring in the area covered by the
Flora Zambesiaca there appear to be no problems with
generic distinctions, as Ross (1983: 157) mentioned
none under the generic or specific treatments. However,
in the key he noted for Erica, ‘bract, and often brac-
teoles, present on pedicel’, which indicates that he re-
garded material with only the partially recaulescent bract
present as belonging to Erica, but in his earlier work
(1957: 38) he regarded material having equal proportions
of one bract and no bract as belonging to Philippia. He
noted that all the populations having these proportions
also agree with all other species of Philippia in having a
disciform stigma and anthers without appendages, and
furthermore, the anthers are united before dehiscence
and united anthers occur in a number of species of Phi-
lippia. He thus implied that these were characters he
used to define the genus.
Pichi-Sermolli & Heiniger, in upholding Philippia for
their highly variable species P. abyssinica, stated (1953:
35) that, even if typical actinomorphic flowers are found
in the Abyssinian plant, the presence of zygomorphic
flowers and, at the same time, the shape of the terminal
part of the style head ‘lead us confidently to refer this
species to the genus Philippia' .
The use of the above additional characters to distin-
guish Philippia from Erica is rejected on the grounds
that they also occur within the genus Erica. The enlarged
terminal portion of the style is an adaptation to wind
pollination (Rebelo et at. 1985) and occurs in 5% of the
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
5
FIGURE 5. — Rowers of Philippia (with bract on left hand side of each flower): 1 , 2 & 3 showing variation in size of the totally recaulescent
bract in P. evansii from (1) Killick 1527 , (2) Edwards 2163 , (3) an isotype, Evans 62 (all PRE); 4, showing a partially recaulescent bract
in position rB? (hatched) removed to reveal the reduced and hair-like abaxial sepal in E. peltaia from Oliver 8815 (STE), (compare with
Figure 4.6); 5, showing a partially recaulescent bract in the position rB:, and with the abaxial sepal suppressed, in P. irrorata from the
type (STE); 6, showing recaulescence of the bract up the pedicel in an unusual flower of P. drakensbergensis from Oliver 8394 (STE); all
drawn X 20.
426 species of Erica occurring in the south-western Cape
Province. This pollination syndrome of small flowers, a
large cyathiform to peltate stigma and the absence of
conspicuous nectaries, although not restricted to the sec-
tion Arsace , is typical of that section. It is also found in
all species of the genera Salaxis , Coccosperma , Scypho-
gyne and Nagelocarpus.
In all species of Ericoideae the anthers are united be-
fore anthesis and in the omithophilous and entomophi-
lous species often remain adhering until disturbed by the
pollinator when an explosive separation causes the pol-
len to be dispersed (Rebelo et al. 1985). There are a few
species of Erica , notably E. embothriifolia Salisb. (with
long tubular flowers), E. coronanthera Compton and
E. syngenesia Compton, in which the anthers remain
fused together. Within the genus Philippia , Aim & Fries
(1927) list 17 of the 40 species as having free anthers. In
southern Africa 12 of the 15 species have free anthers
although some have filaments slightly joined at their
bases.
The above additional characters, used to justify the
separation of variable intermediate specimens, are there-
fore of no value in generic delimitation between Erica
and Philippia.
A detailed examination of bract recaulescence in the
southern African species was undertaken to ascertain the
situation prevailing in the genus there and to assess the
validity of the generic boundaries.
A formula has been developed to express in short
simple terms the number and arrangement of the bract,
bracteoles and calyx within the genera and species of
Ericoideae: B represents the bract; br the bracteoles; a
6
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
indicates that the bract is axial (situated on the main
axis); r, that the organs are partially recaulescent with
the indices15 indicating the position up the pedicel (1 at
the base, 5 at the top); and R, fully recaulescent; K
represents the calyx. Thus the structure of a typical Erica
(ericoid) flower can be indicated by the formula
aB-rB' \2br \4K and that of a typical Philippia (phi-
lippioid) flower by the formula RB,0br,3K or just
RB,3K (Figures 2 & 3). This is an elaboration of the
‘formula’ briefly mentioned by Ross (1957: 738).
The question arises whether any deviations from these
basic formulae exist. Indeed, within Philippia some
flowers occur in which the bract may suppress the ab-
axial sepal but is free from the calyx (Figure 4.6, P.
pallida) and even as low down the pedicel as rB\3K
(Figure 5.4, P. irrorata)', some flowers may even be
rB3_5,4K which also occurs in some species of Erica (see
later). This is clearly an intermediate Erica! Philippia
condition. A detailed analysis of these bract/bracteole-
/calyx conditions in Erica and Philippia was made and
the results are discussed below.
ANALYSIS
Philippia
The majority of species occurring within southern
Africa are typical of the genus in having a fully recaules-
cent bract forming a zygomorphic calyx represented by
RB,3K; these are P. leeana Klotzsch, P. absinthoides
(Thunb.) E. G. H. Oliver, P. evansii, P. notholeeana E.
G. H. Oliver, P. elsieana E. G. H. Oliver, P. irrorata ,
P . procaviana, P. alticola, P. petrophila E. G. H.
Oliver, P. esterhuyseniae E. G. H. Oliver and P.
drakensbergensis E. G. H. Oliver. This formula does
hold in all except a few flowers. The remaining three
species, P. pallida, P. stokoei and P . tristis, showed
highly significant variations (Table 1).
P. pallida L. Guthrie
Until recently this species was known only from the
type collection from near Riversdale ( Muir 2542 in
BOL*) and this is unfortunately in the bud stage. The
taxon is not closely related to any species within Philip-
pia. During an examination of the type it was recognized
as being identical to Erica peltata Andr. which occurs
along the foothills of the mountain ranges from Rivier-
sonderend to George. An analysis of 269 flowers from a
selection of 15 collections of this species in STE pro-
vided a ratio of 22% ericoid: 38% ericoid/philip-
pioid: 40% philippioid flowers. An analysis was then
made of 900 flowers from three well separated popula-
tions (Oliver 8736, 8737 & 8815 in STE). These showed
considerable variation with the above ratios being
16:40:40, 3:30:67 and 0:38:68 respectively. In the last
population one would probably not hesitate to label the
plants as belonging to P. pallida. The various flower
types were found to be randomly scattered in inflores-
cences, occasionally with all three represented in one
inflorescence.
P. stokoei L. Guthrie
This species is very localized on the low mountains
and hills of the western part of the Bredasdorp District. It
* Abbreviations follow those listed in Holmgren, Keuken & Scho-
field, Index Herbariorum, Regnum Vegetabile 106 (1981).
has no close relatives within Philippia but was found to
have been described as E. accommodata Klotzsch var.
ebracteata H. Bol. (Guthrie & Bolus 1905). Material of
the species was thus filed under two separate genera in
herbaria. The taxon bears some resemblance to E. ac-
commodata Klotzsch, which inhabits the high mountains
of the Riviersonderend Range. It is, however, remark-
ably similar to E. lasciva Salisb. of the Cape Town and
Bredasdorp Districts, which species shows no signs of
any bract/bracteole irregularities. An analysis of several
collections of P. stokoei (250 flowers) in STE provided a
ratio of 0:50:50 with not a single flower having the eri-
coid condition. The only difference between P. stokoei
and E. lasciva is in the absence of bracteoles versus two
bracteoles, otherwise the two taxa are identical in shape,
size, indumentum and texture of the flowers and vegeta-
tive parts.
P. tristis H. Bol.
This species was known only from the type collection
made by Bolus in 1877 in the mountains near Graaff-
Reinet in the central Karoo ( Bolus 2594 in BOL, K). The
specimen in BOL has flowers that are in fruit, but it can
be seen that they are mostly of the RB,3K type with a
few rB,0br,4K. A capsule included on the type sheet in
BOL containing a very small specimen collected farther
east by Weale, appeared to be identical but had flowers
of the rB,0br,4K type which would indicate its being an
Erica/Philippia intermediate following the definition as
given above.
I was sent for comment, several new taxa of Erica
from the north-eastern Cape and Natal by Dr O. M.
Hilliard and Mr B. L. Burtt who intended describing
them for their work on the flora of the southern Drakens-
berg. The material of P. tristis was recognized as being
very similar to one of their species, E. caespitosa Hil-
liard & Burtt. This problem will be discussed later under
Erica.
Erica
E. hispidula L./E. inops H. Bol.
E. hispidula is probably the commonest species of
Erica in the Cape Floral Region occurring from the Cape
Peninsula eastwards to the George District and forming
dense stands on mountain slopes. A survey of 1000 flow-
ers from numerous collections (BOL, NBG, STE) cover-
ing the distribution range east of the Cape Peninsula
provided convincing evidence that it belonged to Erica:
it has a ratio of 100:0:0, i.e. all flowers examined were
of the rB'-^br^K type.
There is, however, a problem on the Cape Peninsula
where the species E. inops occurs. This species was
separated from E. hispidula (Guthrie & Bolus 1905;
Salter 1950) solely because of its possession of a bract
but no bracteoles, i.e. it had the formula rB,0br,4K, the
ericoid/philippioid condition. The problem populations
exist on Constantiaberg. Here an examination of E. his-
pidula ( Baker 992 in BOL) showed that the flowers had a
formula rB1-3 and 2br3“5 or 1 br4^5 or even Obr, all with
4K; 1 10 flowers from all the other specimens had a ratio
of 55:45:0. A collection of E. inops ( Baker 791 in BOL)
had the ratio 0:23:77 and 291 flowers from other collec-
tions 87:13:0, suggesting that some of them were E.
7
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
hispidula. An examination of 1370 flowers of my own
collection on Constantiaberg (Oliver 8741 in STE) pro-
duced the ratio 3:96:1. It has been concluded from these
findings that the two species should be merged.
E. ebracteata H. Bol.
The very name of this species points to the generic
problem. It is a species confined to the Natal Drakens-
berg. A survey of 238 flowers from 15 specimens (PRE)
gave a ratio of 1 1 :46:43 similar to that found in E. pel-
tata and indicates that 43% of the flowers on the collec-
tions were in fact philippioid flowers and 46% interme-
diate and only 1 1% ericoid. In this species the variation
from partially to totally recaulescent bracts often occurs
within a single inflorescence (Figure 3).
Erica taxa described by Hilliard & Burtt (1985)
In personal communications with the authors, prior to
the publication of their paper, I pointed out the problem
existing between Erica and Philippia, which was high-
lighted by several of their new taxa (see also Hilliard &
Burtt 1985). I have been able to examine their cited
material and some additional collections.
E. caespitosa Hilliard & Burtt
This species is widespread in the eastern parts of the
country from Somerset East in the Karoo region to the
Drakensberg of the north-eastern Orange Free State. A
survey of 256 flowers from 10 collections (BOL, NU,
STE) gave a ratio of 3:83:14. The philippioid condition
was confined to a few scattered collections, one of
which, Ruddock 55 in NU, had only RB,3K flowers.
This latter collection possessed flowers identical to those
of P. tristis mentioned earlier.
E. anomala Hilliard & Burtt
The specific epithet was chosen to indicate that the
flowers were not typical of Erica. A survey of 100 flow-
ers from 5 collections in NU gave a ratio of 0:40:60
indicating that the majority were of the philippioid type.
The species is in fact no more anomalous than the others
referred to in the present paper. It is also peculiar in
having coherent anthers which are exserted in a ring
around the style in the fruiting stage.
E. dissimulans Hilliard & Burtt
Like E. anomala this species is confined to the Natal
Drakensberg. A survey of 160 flowers from 7 collections
in BOL and NU gave a ratio of 2:98:0.
Flora capensis
A survey of the descriptions of the species of Erica
listed in Flora capensis (Guthrie & Bolus 1905) was
made to see if there were any other species with similar
irregularities. (Note that in that work no distinction is
made between the bract and the bracteoles, all being
referred to as bracts).
E. alticola Guth. & Bol.
This very rare species, probably confined to the east-
ern Transvaal near Barberton, is described as having
‘bracts variable, mostly entirely absent, occasionally 2,
sometimes one only’. An examination of the type collec-
tion ( Bolus 7678 in BOL) showed that the flowers are
very variable, most of the visible ones having the for-
mula aB,0br,3K. Two flowers have aB,2br\4K and a
few have rB2~\0br,4K or rB\0br,4K-RB,3K. Too few
flowers were available for this species to be included in
Table 1 .
TABLE 1. — Distribution of bract/bracteole/calyx characters
in nine species of Erica (Ericoideae) in southern Africa*
* Figures express the percentage of flowers in the samples re-
ferred to in the text and Table.
** E. hispidula , sensu stricto, refers to the non-varying popula-
tions outside of the Cape Peninsula; Constantiaberg refers to
the collections from that mountain.
t E. inops : collections Oliver 8741, Baker 791 and all other
collections.
$ E. peltata (= P. pallida)-, collections from Ashton (Oliver
8815), Swellendam (Oliver 8737) and Niekerkshek (Oliver
8736) and 15 other collections from the complete range of
the species.
E. woodii H. Bol.
This widespread species in the eastern parts of the
country is described as having ‘flowers mostly axillary,
solitary, bracts remote, small, occasionally one want-
ing’. There is in fact always one bract and two brac-
teoles, but the bract is large and axial in position appear-
ing like a normal leaf, thus the formula is aB,2br^,4K.
E. leucopelta Tausch
This similarly widespread species is described with
‘bracts remote, mostly 3, one rather large and 2 usually
small or very minute, or perhaps sometimes wanting’.
The bracteoles are always present and the bract is either
aB or rB1.
E. subverticillaris Diels ex Guth. & Bol.
This species is very rare and known from only two
collections in the Drakensberg of the eastern Transvaal.
It is described as having ‘bracts, one foliaceous, two
minute or often wanting’. Davidson (1985) in separating
off var. revoluta as a distinct species, E. revoluta (H.
Bol.) Davidson, noted that E. subverticillaris has ‘brae-
8
teoles 2, or absent, basal to median, hairlike’. It there-
fore possesses flowers with the intermediate ericoid/phi-
lippioid condition in addition to the normal ericoid ones.
E. sparsa Dulfer (=E. floribunda Lodd.).
This species is common on the coastal flats of the
southern Cape. No indication of any irregularities is
given, but during routine examination of herbarium ma-
terial it was found that variation does occur. Most speci-
mens appear to have rB:"\2br \ An examination of 63
flowers of Fourcade 5010 (STE) revealed that the collec-
tion possessed 56 flowers with the rB: \0br,4K condi-
tion, 2 with rB\2br4 and 5 with RB, whereas the 63
flowers of Keet 703 (STE) all had the rB4 \0br condi-
tion. This is very similar to the situation found in
E. peltata which is placed in the same section.
SPECIES OUTSIDE SOUTHERN AFRICA
A brief reference to material of Philippic i (BOL, MO
& PRE) and to literature on the Ericoideae in tropical
Africa (Aim & Fries 1927; Ross 1957; Pichi-Sermolli &
Heiniger 1953), in Madagascar (Perrier de la Bathie
1927) and on the Mascarene Islands (Friedmann 1981)
revealed a similar variation in the bract/bracteole/calyx
arrangement as outlined above for southern Africa, but
perhaps only to the same degree in the east African P.
keniensis S. Moore and E. kingaensis Engl.
Ross (1957; 739) gave a table analysing some 49 col-
lections of the former species and from this table the
ratio 0:34:66, of different flower types can be deduced,
the 34% having the formula rB?,0br,3K (position of
bract not given by Ross). The problem is also reflected in
the history of one species, first described as P. elgonen-
sis Mildbraed (Mildbraed 1922), transferred to Erica by
Aim & Fries (1927a) and back to Philippia (Ross 1957)
asP. keniensis. subsp. elgonensis (Mildbraed) R. Ross.
Ross also mentioned (1957: 738) an intriguing variant
of P. trirnera. He examined 39 gatherings of that species
from Ruwenzori and found no ericoid flowers. However,
he noted that in some collections, notably Fredericq
9325 , the ‘bract-like segment of the calyx’ was inserted
on the pedicel as much as 1 ,0 mm below the calyx which
was always of the 3K type. Sometimes he found ‘as well
as the normal ones (sepals) two narrower ones flanking
the gap on either side’. These in my opinion are the two
bracteoles giving the formula rB?,2br\3K (position of
bract not given by Ross) which is virtually the formula
for many species of Erica. In my investigations of E.
peltata I have found a similar situation. A paper setting
out my views on the fate of the bracteoles in flowers with
a totally recaulescent bract, derived from investigations
of this species, is in preparation (Oliver in prep.b).
In writing about the very widespread E. arborea and
its allies in Africa, Ross (1956) found that many of the
collections in east Africa, which had previously been
allocated to separate species, belonged to one highly
variable species, E. kingaensis. One of the variable char-
acters was the presence or absence of the two bracteoles.
He did not mention the problem of the relationship with
Philippia and retained the following under this species:
subsp. kingaensis — upper bracts often absent (rB,0-
2br);
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
subsp. rugegensis — upper bracts always present (rB,
2br);
subsp. bequaertii — upper bracts present or absent (rB,
0-2br).
In the collections by Osmaston from Ruwenzori, Ross
noted that all the flowers examined lacked upper bracts.
Therefore some of the material of this species has flow-
ers with the same formula as those in P. keniensis , men-
tioned above.
PHYLOGENY OF THE GENUS PHILIPPIA
In the subfamily Ericoideae only Erica, Philippia,
Blaeria, Ericinella and Bruckenthalia Salisb. possess a
multiseeded dehiscent capsule. Erica is widespread in
Europe and Africa whereas Bruckenthalia is a monotypic
genus confined to the south-eastern highlands of Europe.
The other three genera are endemic to the African conti-
nent (including Madagascar for Philippia) where they
are widespread, more so than is Erica. The remaining 20
genera of the subfamily are confined to the southern tip
of Africa and are characterized by a variety of types of
indehiscent fruit coupled with a reduction in the comple-
ment of floral parts.
The relationships within this group of capsular genera
are very close, with generic distinctions being based on
the flimsiest of morphological characters. They indicate
that these genera have arisen from some ancestral ericoid
stock: Philippia by the total recaulescence of the bract;
Blaeria by the reduction in the number of stamens and
Ericinella by a combination of both processes.
In the southern African representatives of Philippia,
relationships for the majority of species occur within the
section Arsace of Erica. This section is found throughout
Africa and Europe and includes the most widespread
species of Erica, E. arborea L. , which is regarded (Han-
sen 1950) as the most primitive of the European species
based on architecture and inflorescence structure. The
section is characterized by the small coralline urceolate
to cyathiform flowers, mostly dull white or greenish in
colour, and a relatively large expanded and exserted
stigma which is developed for wind pollination. The
flowers being coralline means that the calyx is small,
relative to the corolla and is composed of foliar sepals.
These characters place the section in the subgenus Eu-
erica.
Two species of Philippia, P. stokoei and P. pallida,
have been found to be conspecific with two species of
Erica : P. stokoei with E. lasciva and P. pallida with E.
peltata. In these two taxa the calyces are different from
those in sect. Arsace: they are not small and foliar in
character. The two species are placed in different subge-
nera because of the shape of the corolla and form of the
calyx. E. lasciva is placed in the subgenus Chlamy-
danthe section Elytrostegia because of its calycine flow-
ers with the bracts and sepals relatively large and cartila-
ginous and the stamens exserted. E. peltata, on the other
hand, is placed in the subgenus Platy stoma section Poly-
codon which is characterized by broadly cyathiform co-
rollas and broader, more prominent concolorous sepals.
Both sections contain species adapted to wind pollina-
tion, i.e. with an expanded stigma (Rebelo et al. 1985). I
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
9
consider the expanded stigma in these two species as the
result of convergent evolution in the pollination syn-
dromes.
Aim & Fries (1927b: 8) regarded section Arsace in
Erica as containing some species that can be described as
‘Ur-Philippien’ (proto-philippias). They stated that there
can be no doubt about the origin of Philippic/. However,
later on (1927: 1 1), in discussing the relationships within
the section Euphilippia , on the grounds that one cannot
see close relations between the species in the southern
and eastern regions of Africa and those of Madagascar
and the Mascarenes, they stated ‘kann es nicht ohne
weiteres angenommen werden, dass die Section einen
einheitlichen Ursprung habe’. They believed that the
Madagascan/Mauritian species and the African species
had a polyphyletic origin whilst the African species were
monophyletic, but earlier on the same page they stated
clearly that they could not find any close relationship
between the Madagascan/Mauritian species and the con-
tinental species nor between the tropical African and the
Cape species.
Pichi-Sermolli & Heiniger (1953: 36) supported the
hypothesis of Aim & Fries that Philippic/ ‘branched off’
from the section Arsace. They regarded their aberrant
ericoid P. abyssir/ica as the species most closely related
to Erica and, being at the northern limit of the genus
Philippic /, ‘the differentiation of Philippic/ .... took place
in the north .... rather than in the South African ones’ .
CONCLUSIONS
It is evident from the above investigation of southern
African species that the sole character for distinguishing
between the genera Erica and Philippic/ , the degree of
recaulescence of the bract, breaks down in a number of
species, more frequently, relatively speaking, in Philip-
pic/ than in the very large genus Erica (Table 1 ).
A ratio of 100:0:0 representing the aB-rB1 \2br' \4K
condition is characteristic of about 99% of the species of
Erica whereas a ratio of 0:0:100 or RB,3K (except for
the occasional aberrant flower) characterizes 12 of the 15
species of Philippic/ occurring in southern Africa. The
possession of flowers falling within the middle portion
(X) of the ratio 0:X:0 would place a specimen interme-
diate between the two genera with the formula
rB2~\0br,3-4K. From Table 1 it can be seen that only
two of the species discussed, E. dissimulans and E. his-
piclula sens, strict., tend to the ericoid side and one spe-
cies, E. anomala , tends towards to the philippioid side.
Six species, E. cc/espitosa (P. tristis ), E. hispiclulal
inops, E. ebractec/ta, E. lasciva (P. stokoei ), E. peltc/ta
(P. pallida) and E. sparsa, have ratios that make it im-
possible to place them satisfactorily in either genus.
It could be argued that a species should be placed in
Erica if it had more flowers that were typically ericoid
than typically philippioid, and vice versa. Thus from
Table 1 and previous discussion E. dissimulans and
E. subverticillaris could be retained in Erica whereas E.
cc/espitosa, E. anomala and E. ebractec/ta should be
transferred to Philippic/. This would require a thorough
analysis of all the flowers on any specimen before it
could be correctly identified. What then would be the
fate of E. alticola, E. hispidulal inops, E. lasciva (P.
stokoei), E. peltc/ta (P . pallida) and E. sparsa ? These are
five totally unrelated species each exhibiting a complete
range of variation from the typical ericoid flower to the
typical philippioid flower. They are all natural species
whose remarkable variability cannot be ascribed to hy-
bridization between species of Erica and Philippic/.
The problem is compounded by geographical con-
siderations because it is not confined to one small area.
This problem as discussed above occurs on the Cape
Peninsula, the southern Cape Province and on the Natal
Drakensberg in southern Africa as well as on the Masca-
rene Islands, the East African highlands and the island of
Sao Tome off West Africa. A polyphyletic origin for the
genus as presently construed is strongly indicated by this
evidence. The genus Philippia can therefore not be
upheld as a natural grouping of species.
I therefore propose to reduce the genus Philippia to
synonymy under Erica. This action will have far-reach-
ing nomenclatural repercussions in the rest of Africa and
Madagascar as pointed out by Hilliard & Burtt (1985:
240). The above decision is therefore not made without
careful consideration of and due regard for these reper-
cussions. A paper formalizing the above proposal and
providing the new combinations for the southern African
material is being published separately (Oliver 1987b).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am grateful to the directors of BOL, MO, NBG, NU
and PRE for the loan of material, to Dr Olive M. Hilliard
(formerly of Pietermaritzburg, now Edinburgh) and Mr
B. L. Burtt (Edinburgh) for stimulating correspondence,
to Dr P. F. Stevens (Harvard) and Dr H, P. Linder (Cape
Town) for comments on drafts of this manuscript, and to
Dr L. J. Dorr (Missouri) for a week of fruitful dis-
cussions in Stellenbosch. This work forms part of doc-
toral studies being undertaken through the Bolus Herbar-
ium, University of Cape Town.
REFERENCES
ALM, C. G. & FRIES, T. C. E. 1927a. Monographic der Gattungen
Philippia Klotzsch, Mitrastylus nov. gen. und Ericinella
Klotzsch. Kungliga Svenska ve/enskapsakademiens handlingar,
ser. 3, 4,4: 1^49.
ALM, C. G. & FRIES, T. C. E 1927b. Die tropischen Arten der
Gattung Erica L. Arkivfor Botanik 21,7: 1-21.
BENTHAM, G. 1839. Ericaceae. In A. P. De Candolle, Prodromus
systemaiis naturalis regni vegetabilisl: 580-733. Paris.
DAVIDSON, L. E. 1985. A change in status for Erica subverticillaris
var. revoluta from the eastern Transvaal. South African Journal of
Botany 51: 71-73.
FRIEDMANN, F. 1981. Ericacees. In J. Bosser et a!., Flore des
Mascareignes 112: 1-13. Sugar Industry Research Institute, Mau-
ritius.
FUNK, V. A. 1985. Cladistics and generic concepts in the Composi-
tae. Taxon 34,1: 72-80.
GUTHRIE, F. & BOLUS, H. 1905. Erica. In W. T. Thiselton-Dyer,
Flora Capensis 4,1: 2-3 1 5 .
HANSEN, I. 1950. Die europaischen Arten der Gattung Erica
L. Botanische Jahrbiicher75,\: 1-81.
HILLIARD, O. M. & BURTT, B. L. 1985. Notes on some plants of
southern Africa chiefly from Natal: XI. Notes from the Royal
Botanic Garden Edinburgh 42,2: 227-260.
KLOTZSCH, J. F. 1834. Ericearum a cel. Adelberto de Chamisso
descriptarum. Linnaea 9: 350-367.
10
MILDBRAED, J. 1922. Notizblatt des Botanischen Gartens und
Museums zu Berlin-Dahlem 8: 232.
OLIVER, E. G. H. 1987a. Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae). V.
The genus Coilostigma. Bothalia 17: 163-170.
OLIVER, E. G. H. 1987b. Studies in the Ericoideae. VO. The placing
of the genus Philippia into synonymy under Erica', the southern
African species. South African Journal of Botany 53: 455-458.
OLIVER, E. G. H. in prep. a. Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae).
VIII. A note on brachyblasts and the interpretation of recaules-
cence by Aim & Fries. Bothalia.
OLIVER, E. G. H. in prep. b. Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae).
X. The fate of the bracteoles (prophylls) in species possessing a
fully recaulescent bract. Bothalia.
PERRIER DE LA BATHIE, H. 1927. Les Philippia de Madagascar.
Archives de botanique, Memoires, Caen 1, memoire 2: 1-68.
PERRIER DE LA BATHIE, H. 1930. Au sujet des Philippia de Mada-
gascar et de quelques especes ou varietes nouvelles recueillies par
M. H. Humbert au cours de ses demieres missions. Archives de
botanique, Bulletin mensuel, Caen 4, bulletin 3: 25-34.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
PHILLIPS, E. P. 1944. Notes on the minor genera of the Ericaceae.
Journal of South African Botany 10: 69-73.
PHILLIPS, E. P. 1951. The genera of South African flowering plants,
2nd edn, 558-562. Division of Botany and Plant Pathology, Pre-
toria.
PICHI-SERMOLLI, R. & HEINIGER, H. 1953. Adumbratio florae
Aethiopicae. II. Ericaceae. Webbia 9: 9-48.
REBETO, A. G., SIEGFRIED, W. R. & OLIVER, E. G. H. 1985.
Pollination syndromes of Erica species in the south-western Cape.
South African Journal of Botany 5 1 ,4: 270-280.
ROSS, R. 1956. On some African tree heathers. Annals & Magazine
of Natural History, ser. 12, 9: 89-96.
ROSS, R. 1957. Notes on Philippia. Bulletin du Jardin botanique de
I’Etat, Bruxelles 27,4: 733-754.
ROSS, R. 1983. Ericaceae. In E. Launert, Flora Zambesiaca 7,1:
157-181. Flora Zambesiaca Committee, London.
SALTER, T. M. 1950. Ericaceae. In R. S. Adamson & T. M. Salter,
Flora of the Cape Peninsula. Juta, Cape Town.
WEBERLING, F. 1981. Morphologie der Bliiten und der Blii-
tenstdnde. pp. 391. Ulmer, Stuttgart.
Bothalia 18,1: 11-24(1988)
A synopsis of the tribe Desmodieae (Fabaceae) in southern Africa
B. D. SCHRIRE*
Keywords: Alysicarpus, Desmodieae, Desmodium, Fabaceae, key, Lespedeza, Papilionoideae, Pseudarthria, southern Africa, synopsis
ABSTRACT
The tribe Desmodieae has a pantropical distribution and is one of the most advanced tribes in the subfamily Papilionoi-
deae. Its greatest centres of development are in tropical Asia and America. Africa is relatively poorly endowed and only
four genera comprising 16 species occur in the flora of southern Africa. Many of these species are widespread in the Old
World tropics and the few African endemics appear to be closely related to them. A synopsis of the genera Desmodium,
Pseudarthria, Alysicarpus and Lespedeza is given for southern Africa.
UITTREKSEL
Die tribus Desmodieae het ’n pantropiese verspreiding en is een van die mees gevorderde tribusse in die subfamilie
Papilionoideae. Die grootste sentrums van ontwikkeling is in tropiese Asie en Amerika. Die groep is swak verteenwoordig
in Afrika en slegs vier genusse wat 16 spesies insluit, kom in die flora van suidelike Afrika voor. Baie van hierdie spesies is
wydverspreid in die Ou Wereldse trope en dit lyk asof die paar wat endemies in Afrika is, naverwant aan hulle is. ’n
Samevatting van die genusse Desmodium, Pseudarthria, Alysicarpus en Lespedeza word vir suidelike Afrika gegee.
INTRODUCTION
The tribe Desmodieae comprises 27 genera with a
mainly tropical distribution and is distinguished from the
other tribes with jointed indehiscent fruits by the pre-
sence of (1-) 3-foliolate leaves with stipels (Ohashi
1971a).
Three subtribes have been recognized in the latest
treatment of Ohashi, Polhill & Schubert (1981). The
largest and most polymorphic of these is the subtribe
Desmodiinae which is represented in southern Africa by
three genera, Desmodium, Pseudarthria and Alysicar-
pus. The much smaller subtribe Lespedezinae is only
represented in the flora by the naturalized bush-clover
genus, Lespedeza. The type genus, Desmodium, is the
most widespread genus in the tribe and with about 300
species (Ohashi etal. 1981) is also the most numerous. It
occurs widely in the tropical and subtropical regions of
America, Asia, Australia and Africa with two major
centres of diversification: firstly, in Mexico and Brazil,
where there is perhaps the largest number of species with
the most diverse development of plant parts (Schubert
1963); and then in Asia (the Sino-Indian region down
through Malesia to Australia) where there are large
numbers of species in many subgeneric groups. In addi-
tion the least specialized subgenera and the most archaic
genera in the tribe are found in the Asian region, indicat-
ing a possible centre of origin for the genus (Ohashi et
al. 1981).
Of the ten species of Desmodium found in southern
Africa most have an Asian origin, although there are a
few that are endemic in Africa. Some too, are natural-
ized introductions from the New World. Pseudarthria
with 4 to 6 species and Alysicarpus with 25 to 30 species
are in the main, tropical Old World genera. These are
* Botanical Research Institute, Private Bag X 10 1 , Pretoria 0001. Pre-
sently: South African Liaison Officer, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, England.
MS. received: 1985.09.01.
represented in the flora of southern Africa by one and
four species respectively. Southern Africa contains the
tail-end of the tribe’s tropical African distribution as well
as a number of naturalized introductions. All specimens
examined are listed alphabetically according to the name
of the collector after the references at the end of the
article.
The Desmodieae is a tribe of annual herbs or, more
commonly, perennial suffrutices occupying, in southern
Africa, the southerly extension of the large Sudano-Zam-
bezian region of savanna and woodland areas of tropical
Africa, and to a lesser extent the Afromontane and
Indian Ocean coastal belt vegetation types of Werger
(1978). In general the tribe occurs in the warmer and
wetter parts of the Flora area.
TAXONOMIC BACKGROUND
In 1753 Hedysarum L. was published in Species plan-
tarum along with two species occurring in the Flora area,
H. gangeticum and H. vaginale. In 1759 H. barbatum
was published by Linnaeus in Systema naturae. From
then until the early 1800’s various authors described
other species in Hedysarum: Aublet (1775), H. racemo-
sum {—H. incanum)', Swartz (1788), H. adscendens and
H. tortuosum ; Vahl (1791), H. repandum and H. gluma-
ceum ; Willdenow (1802), H. velutinum and H. rugosum
and Poiret (1805), H. salicifolium.
It was recognized that several different genera existed
in Hedysarum and in 1803 Michaux described the genus
Lespedeza. Don transferred Anthyllus cuneata Du Mont,
to this genus in 1832. In 1813 Desvaux described Des-
modium and Alysicarpus and in 1825, A. P. de Candolle
placed all the above-mentioned species, with the excep-
tion of H. barbatum, into one or other of these genera.
A. P. de Candolle also described the genus Nicolsonia
into which Meyer (1836) placed two new species occur-
ring in the Flora area, N. caffra and N. setigera. The
genus Pseudarthria was published at the same time as
12
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
KEY TO SUBTRIBES
Plants with characteristic uncinate hairs; tertiary venation ± scalariform; stipels present; flowers chasmogamous,
with an explosively dehiscent pollination mechanism; standard with hardly or slightly indexed auricles;
ovary( 1) to many-ovulate subtribe Desmodiinae
Plants without uncinate hairs; tertiary venation reticulate; stipels absent; flowers chasmogamous, not explosively
dehiscent, often mixed with cleistogamous flowers; standard with indexed auricles more persistent than most
Desmodiinae; ovary 1-ovulate subtribe Lespedezinae
the species P. hookeri by Wight & Amott in 1834. Ben-
tham, in his review of the Leguminosae in 1852, placed
Hedysarum barbatum and Nicolsonia caffra under Des-
modium, calling the latter Desmodium dregeanum. Har-
vey (1862), in revising the South African representatives
of the tribe for Flora capensis, placed Nicolsonia seti-
gera under Desmodium and described a new species,
Alysicarpus zeyheri. The genus Nicolsonia was later put
into synonomy with Desmodium.
Other major contributors to the literature on the tribe
include Baker (1871), Schindler (1928), Baker, E. G.
(1929), Schubert & Verdcourt (1971), Ohashi (1971b,
1973), Verdcourt (1974), Ohashi, Polhill & Schubert
(1981) and Schrire (1984).
The subgeneric treatment of Desmodium is as yet
unsatisfactory but for the purposes of this synopsis the
treatment of Ohashi (1973) is followed, i.e. D. repan-
dum is placed in subgenus Podocarpium ; D. setigerum,
D. adscendens, D. barbatum and D. dregeanum in sub-
genus Nicolsonia and the rest in subgenus Heteroloma.
TRIBE DESMODIEAE
Desmodieae (Benth.) Hutch., The genera of flow-
ering plants 1 : 477 (1964), pro parte; Schubert & Verde.:
450 (1971); Verde.: 505 (1974); Ohashi et al.,: 292
(1981). Type genus: Desmodium Desv.
Coronilleae Adans.: 327 (1763), pro parte.
Hedysareae DC.: 307 (1825), pro parte.
Hedysareae subtribe Desmodiinae (as Desmodieae)
Benth.: 449 (1865), pro parte; Taub.: 325 (1894), pro
parte.
Coronilleae subtribe Desmodiinae (Benth.) Schulz-
Menz: 237 (1964), pro parte; Ohashi: 52 (1971a).
Herbs or suffrutices, sometimes shrubs or rarely trees.
Roots woody, often dichotomously branched, cord-like
and producing rhizomes, or more rarely taproots. Leaves
pinnately 3— (9)- or 1-foliolate, petioles sulcate, foliar
and foliolar pulvini present, stipellate (except Lespe-
deza)\ stipules mostly striate. Pseudoracemes variously
contracted, terminal, axillary or occasionally leaf-
opposed, sometimes paniculately branched. Flowers
pedicellate, fasciculate, mostly paired, rarely solitary on
the rhachis, usually subtended by 2 series of bracts and
occasionally bracteoles. Calyx 2-lobed, the upper with 2
connate sepals often slightly bifid at the apex, the lower
3-toothed with the central tooth longer than the laterals,
or the calyx almost equally 5-lobed. Corolla papilionoid.
Stamens mostly diadelphous with the vexillary stamen
free, rarely pseudo-monadelphous; filaments equal or
alternating in length; anthers uniform. Pollen tricol-
porate with a generally thickened endexine and thin or no
foot layer. Fruits transversely jointed into a number of
articles or reduced to one article, or less often 2-valved,
opening along one suture (valves not twisting). Seeds
with a well developed radicular lobe, longer than the
cotyledonary lobe, mostly with a rim aril. Seedlings
generally epigeous with the first two eophylls opposite
and unifoliolate.
Subtribe Desmodiinae
Desmodiinae sensu Ohashi et al. in Advances in
legume systematics 1 : 296 (1981).
Pseudarthrieae Hutch.: 398 (1964), pro parte.
DESMODIUM
Desmodium Desv., Journal de botanique 1: 122,
t.5 (1813) nom. conserv.; DC.: 325 (1825); Benth.: 220
(1852); Harv.: 227 (1862); Benth.: 519 (1865); Harv.:
82 (1868); Bak.: 159 (1871); Bak.: 161 (1876); Taub.:
327 (1894); Schindl.: 263 (1928); Hutch. & Dalz.: 417
(1928); Bak.f.: 324 (1929); Phill.: 332 (1951); Schubert:
287 (1952); Schubert: 180 (1954); Hepper: 582 (1958);
Knaap-van Meeuwen: 240 (1962); Hutch.: 481 (1964);
Torre: 217 (1966); Schreiber: 30 (1970); Schubert: 451
(1971); Ohashi: 87 (1973); Verde.: 506 (1974); Dyer:
263 (1975); Compton: 272 (1976); Schubert: 622 (1980).
Type species: D. scorpiurus (Swartz) Desv. ( Hedysarum
scorpiurus Swartz).
KEY TO GENERA
la Calyx often membranous, never glumaceous or striate, shallowly divided, usually inconspicuous in fruit; fruit
mostly held away from erect; leaves ( I)— 3- (5)- foliolate:
2a Stipules stramineous, striate, erect or spreading but never sharply recurved and velutinous; fruit distinctly
jointed, breaking up into individual articles Desmodium
2b Stipules mostly sharply recurved, dark brown adaxially, silver-velutinous abaxially; fruit splitting into 2
valves Pseudarthria
lb Calyx glumaceous, striate, deeply divided, persistent and often partially enclosing the fruit; fruit held erect,
usually consisting of a number of 'stacked' terete or subterete articles; leaves 1-foliolate Alysicarpus
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
13
Hedysarum L.: 745 (1753), pro parte (name still cor-
rect for other plants).
Meibomia Heist, ex Fabricius: 168 (1759), nom.
rejic.; Adans.: 509(1763); Kuntze: 195 (1891).
Nicolsonia DC.: 325 (1825).
The name Desmodium was conserved over the name
Meibomia by the International Botanical Congress of
Vienna in 1905 (Schubert 1950). Desmodium is derived
from the Greek ‘desmos’ meaning a band or chain, and
‘hode’ meaning like, in reference to the jointed pod’s
resemblance to the links of a chain.
SYNOPSIS OF SPECIES
1. Desmodium repandum (Vahl) DC., Prodromus
systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 2: 334 (1825);
Schindl.: 295 (1928); Schubert: 293 (1952); Schubert:
193, 1. 14 (1954); Hepper: 584 (1958); White: 150
(1962); Laundon: 221 (1966); Schubert: 465, t. 65/11
(1971); Verde.: 517 (1974); Compton: 272 (1976).
Type: Yemen, Forsskal (C, holo., fide Schindl.— GH,
photo.!).
Hedysarum repandum Vahl: 32 (1791); Poir.: 408 (1805).
Desmodium scalpe DC.: 334 (1825); Bak.: 164 (1871); Hutch. &
Dalz.: 418 (1928); Bak. f.: 328 (1929); Robyns: 327, t.30 (1948);
Brenan: 420 (1949). Type: Mauritius (Isle de Bourbon), Commerson
(P-LA, holo.; GH, photo.!).
Desmodium strangulatum Wight & Am.: 228 (1834); Harv.: 228
(1862). Type: E Peninsular India, Walker in Wight cat. no. 774 (K,
holo.!;GH).
Desmodium caffrum Eckl. & Zeyh.: 251 (1836) non (E.Mey.)
Druce: 619 (1917), which is a later illegitimate name forZ). dregeanum
Benth. Type: E Cape, Mankazana R., Eckl. & Zeyh. in Enum. 1662
(K, iso.!).
KEY TO SPECIES
la Inflorescences of variously lax to dense, elongated, axillary and terminal pseudoracemes, the terminal ones often
paniculately branched; calyx teeth short, triangular or lanceolate, the adaxial two usually markedly connate
forming a lip:
2a Flowers 8,0—14,0 mm long, brick red; herbs or subshrubs, climbing or scrambling and forming a dense
undergrowth in forest; leaflets rhomboid, deep green venation craspedodromous; inflorescences very lax;
stamens partially monadelphous \.D. repandum
2b Flowers 4,5-8,0 mm long, variously pink, mauve or purple but never red; plants not as above, stamens
always diadelphous:
3a Plants becoming erect to semi-erect suffrutices or subshrubs if not burned; leaflets never obovate, lateral
veins not obviously looping in the distal half of the leaves; floral bracts present; inflorescences variously
contracted:
4a Flowers uniformly deep mauve; pseudoracemes terminal only, and never paniculately branched; leaflets
glossy dark green with characteristic light discolouration along the midrib above; widespread weeds of
disturbed areas in coastal Zululand, Natal, Transkei and eastern Cape to 1 000 m 2.D. incanum
4b Flowers light pink or purple, dark purple only at the tip of the keel; pseudoracemes terminal and often
axillary, the terminal ones often paniculately branched; leaflets various, not as above:
5a Leaves trifoliolate:
6a Venation mixed craspedodromous with principal lateral veins prominent and parallel; leaflets dis-
tinctly saliciform; stipules not as below; articles of the fruit rectangular or oblong, not or slightly
constricted at the isthmi; shrub growing in or near water 4. D. salicifolium
6b Venation eucamptodromous, lateral veins neither prominent nor regular; stipules markedly auri-
culate at the base on the leaf-opposed margin, fused into a collar around the stem when young;
articles of the fruit orbicular to elliptic, strongly constricted at the isthmi; introduced weed with a
restricted distribution 3. D. tortuosum
5b Leaves unifoliolate:
7a Leaflets chartaceous, ovate or cordiform with entire margins, venation eucamptodromous; stipules
gradually narrowing from the base to a slender apex 6. D. gangeticum
7b Leaflets crassate, velutinous, suborbicular, often with sinuate margins; venation craspedodromous;
stipules abruptly narrowing from an auriculate base to a long slender apex 5. D. velutinum
3b Plants procumbent, or stoloniferous creepers; leaflets obovate, lateral veins obviously looping in the distal
half of the leaves; floral bracts usually absent; inflorescences lax:
8a Procumbent herbs rooting from the lower nodes, in open grassland to forest fringes, often drying brown or
grey-green in herbarium specimens; articles of the fruit U-shaped, 1 ,5-2,0 mm wide 7. D. setigerum
8b Stoloniferous herbs of moist forest and forest margin undergrowth, often drying deep green in herbarium
specimens; articles approximately obtriangular, 2,5-3, 0 mm wide 8. D. adscendens
lb Inflorescences congested into dense spicate or capitate pseudoracemes, never paniculately branched but often
with the upper axillary and terminal inflorescences crowded together; calyx teeth long-acuminate, the adaxial
two not markedly connate:
9a Leaves variously 3 or 1-foliolate; inflorescences spicate; pedicels often dark-coloured, visibly deflexed dis-
tally; bracteoles absent; woody herbs in mixed open woodland; northern and eastern
Transvaal 10. D. barbatum
9b Leaves 3-foliolate, conduplicate; inflorescences densely capitate; pedicels not obvious; bracteoles 2,
clasping the calyx; woody herbs mostly of moist grassland 9. D. dregeanum
14
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
Distribution: 1, Transvaal— a, in Mixed and Sourish
Mixed Bushveld, Acocks Veld Types 18 & 19, from
Zeerust in the west to near Witbank in the east; b, in
similar bushveld or in other types of Sourveld and Sour
Bushveld, Acocks Veld Types 8 & 9, from Louis Tri-
chardt, Pietersburg and Tzaneen in the north, between
Lydenburg and Graskop, Belfast and Barberton, to west-
ern Swaziland in the south. It does not occur in the Low-
veld. 2, Natal— where suitable forest patches occur from
the Drakensberg to almost sea level except in coastal
Dune forest. 3, Transkei and eastern Cape to the coastal
southern Cape at Knysna.
This species is widespread in tropical and subtropical
Africa, Madagascar, the Mascarene Islands, India and
south-east Asia to Malesia.
Vouchers: Compton 27287 (PRE, SAM); Flanagan 515 (BOL,
GRA, NBG, NU, PRE, SAM); B. & C Howlett 16 (NH, NU, PRE);
Kluge 467 (PRE, PRU); Wells 2880 (GRA, NH, PRE).
Notes
(1) Desmodium repandum is found in shaded areas in
moist to dry evergreen mountain, riverine or other gal-
lery forest often near paths or along streams, from ±
3 000 m to near sea level. It occurs as a forest floor herb
or scrambling subshrub. Flowering is from August to
June although most commonly from January to May.
(2) In the latest Asian revision of Desmodium by Oha-
shi (1973), D. repandum is placed in the most advanced
subgenus Podocarpium, because it is characterized by a
monadelphous androecium and long-stipitate pods con-
sisting of indehiscent, approximately obtriangular
articles. However, the androecium cannot be considered
to be truly monadelphous, the vexillary stamen being
coherent (not fused) for part of its length only. The pol-
len grains are also quite distinct from those of all other
species of the subgenus Podocarpium, especially in the
shape of the grains, the colpi and thickness of the exine
(Ohashi 1973). D. repandum is also noted (Ohashi 1973)
for having several characters in common with some
members of the less derived subgenus Dollinera.
From observations on the degree of contraction of the
pseudoraceme in D. repandum it appears that this also
shows a less derived situation. Occasionally one pedicel
may be seen to branch off another, above the fascicle,
indicating incomplete reduction of the botrys. A number
of pedicels also occur in the fascicle, three or four of
which may flower with one or two reduced buds in
between. The fascicle in all the other species in the Flora
area has been reduced to two pedicels with or without
one enclosed median bud.
2. Desmodium incanum DC., Prodromus
systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 2: 332 (1825);
Bak.: 163 (1871); Hutch. & Dalz.: 418 (1928); Nicol-
son: 365 (1978). Type illustration: Plumier, in J. Bur-
man, PI. Amer.: 140, t. 149, fig. 1 (1757) — Hedysarum
fold’s ternatis, ovatis, floribus spicatis{\).
Hedysarum racemosum Aubl.: 11 A (1775). Type: as for species.
This is the first legitimate name but the epithet is unavailable in Desmo-
dium. Hedysarum incanum Swartz: 107 (1788) reprint 1962; Swartz:
1264 (1806), non Thunb. (1784). Illegitimate renaming of H. racemo-
sum Aubl. Hedysarum canum J. F. Gmel.: 1124 (1791), non Lunan
(1814). Superfluous renaming of H. racemosum Aubl. Desmodium
canum (J. F. Gmel.) Schinz & Thell : 371 (1913); Schinz & Thell.:
428 (1913); Schubert: 184 (1954); Hepper: 584 (1958); Schubert: 456
(1971). Treated as a new name with priority from publication because
of the illegitimate basionym, it is a superfluous renaming of D. inca-
num EXT.
Hedysarum frutescens auct. non L.: Jacq.: 47, t. 89 (1776).
Desmodium frutescens sensu Schindl.: 9 (1928); Bak. f.: 328
(1929). Intended as a new combination of H . frustescens sensu Jacq.
Distribution: Desmodium incanum occurs along the
coast and hinterland up to 1 000 m in Natal, and in
coastal Transkei just into the eastern Cape.
Vouchers: Fisher 590 (NH, NU); Gillen 1203 (BOL, NH); Grobbe-
laar 284 (PRE, PRU); Ward 584 (NU, PRE); Wood 644 (BOL, SAM).
Notes
(1) D. incanum is a spreading herb to woody subshrub
up to 1 m (if protected from fire); the leaf shape may
vary; leaves in deep shade may superficially resemble
those of D. adscendens. Confusion between the two may
occur on forest margins but the partially connate sti-
pules, deep mauve flowers and characteristic fruit of D.
incanum will help to distinguish them. D. incanum is
otherwise readily recognized by its shiny dark green
leaves with a light discolouration along the midrib.
Flowering occurs from September to June.
(2) The plant is a weed in disturbed grassland, wood-
land and forest edges, along streams, paths and roadsides
and often occurs in lawns. It is also invasive in undis-
turbed grassland.
(3) D. incanum is tropical American in origin but is
widely scattered throughout tropical Africa where it is
introduced. It is most likely to have entered the Flora
area along the Natal coast. The Zulu name ‘isinama’
describes the fruit which readily catches and sticks to
clothing. Allen & Allen (1981) refer to the plant as
Kaimi clover or creeping beggarweed and it is favoured
as a forage legume in Hawaii and Florida for its tolerance
to acid soils and wet warm climate.
3. Desmodium tortuosum (Swartz) DC., Prodro-
mus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 2: 332 (1825);
Schubert: 202 (1954); Hepper: 585 (1958); Lind & Tal-
lantire: 82, t. 32 (1962); Laundon; 223 (1966); Schubert:
474 (1971); Verde.: 526 (1974). Type: Jamaica, Swartz
(S, lecto.-GH, photo.!).
Hedysarum tortuosum Swartz: 107 (1788) reprint 1962; Swartz:
1271 (1806).
Desmodium spirale auct. non (Swartz) DC.: Bak.: 160 ( 1871 ); Bak.
f.: 331(1929).
Distribution: D. tortuosum is an escape from cultiva-
tion which has now become naturalized in disturbed
grassy areas or along roadsides, in Nelspruit in the
Transvaal, and in the Durban and Port Shepstone Dis-
tricts of Natal.
Vouchers: Coleman 1103 (NH); Mogg, Govt. Herb. 10071 (PRE);
Nichols 433 (NH); Rabie 273 (PRE).
Notes
( 1 ) The Swartz specimen has been chosen as the type
(Schubert pers. comm. 1983) in preference to the Sloan
illustration: 1 16, t. 9 (1696), following the precept in the
Guide for the Determination of Types, ICBN (Stafleu
1983), T. 4b: ‘A specimen is to be given preference over
pre-Linnaean or other cited descriptions or illustrations
when lectotypes of names of species or infra-specific
taxa are designated (see Art. 9.3)’.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
(2) D. tortuosum is an herbaceous suffrutex or small
shrub to I m, flowering from December to May. It is
known as Florida beggarweed in the south eastern United
States (Schubert 1971) and is cultivated as a green
manure. It is now naturalized throughout the Old World
tropics coming originally from tropical and subtropical
America. The populations in Durban and Port Shepstone
are large and well established.
4. Desmodium salicifolium (Poir.) DC., Prodro-
mus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 2: 337 (1825).
Type: Herb, de I’lnde de M. Poivre (P-Ju 15552,
holo.-GH, photo.!).
Hedysarum salicifolium Poir.: 422 (1805).
Desmodium paleaceum Guill. & Perr.: 209 (1832). Type: Senegal,
Perrottet 246 (P, holo.; W).
Desmodium grande E. Mey.: 124 (1836). Type: Durban (Port
Natal), Drege (B, holo.; W, K!).
var. salicifolium
Schubert in Bulletin du Jardin botanique de l’Etat, a
Bruxelles 22: 294 (1952); Schubert: 470, t. 65/1 (1971);
Verde.: 523 (1974).
Hedysarum salicifolium Poir.: 422 (1805). Desmodium salicifolium
(Poir.) DC.: 337 (1825); Bak.f.: 330 (1929); Schubert: 294 (1952);
Schubert: 198, t. XV (1954); Hepper: 584 (1958); White: 150 (1962);
Laundon: 224, t. 20A (1966); Schubert: 469, t. 65/1 (1971); Verde :
522(1974).
Desmodium paleaceum Guill. & Perr.: 209 (1832); Bak.: 166
(1871); Hutch. & Dalz.: 418 ( 1928).
Desmodium grande E. Mey.: 124 ( 1836); Harv.: 228(1862).
Distribution: D. salicifolium var. salicifolium occurs
in northern South West Africa/Nambia, Caprivi and nor-
thern Botswana, and in Mozambique coming into Koma-
tipoort and Nelspruit in the Transvaal, eastern Swaziland
and southward along coastal Zululand and Natal, from
0- 1 000 m. It occurs widely in tropical Africa, Mada-
gascar and the Mascarene Islands.
Vouchers: Buitendag 1155 (NBG, PRE); Moll & Nel 5610 (NH,
PRE); Venter 5489 (PRE, ZULU); Ward 5560 (NH, NU); Wylie sub
Wood 10335 (GRA, PRE, SAM, STE).
Note
D. salicifolium is a suffrutex or shrub of wet places,
principally along river margins or in swamp forest. It
often occurs in wet clayey soil and flowers from August
to May.
5. Desmodium velutinum (Willd.) DC., Prodro-
mus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 2: 328 (1825);
Schubert: 294 (1952); Schubert: 194 (1954); Hepper:
584 (1958); White: 150 (1962); Schubert: 292 (1963);
Laundon: 219 (1966); Schubert: 466, t. 65/7 (1971);
Verde.: 518 (1974). Type: Herb. Willdenow 13763 (B,
holo.-GH, photo.!).
Hedysarum velutinum Willd.: 1 174 ( 1802).
Hedysarum lasiocarpum Beauv.: 32, t. 18 (1805). Desmodium
lasiocarpum (Beauv) DC.: 328 (1825); Bak.: 162 (1871); Hutch. &
Dalz.: 418 ( 1928); Bak.f.: 326 ( 1929). Type: Nigeria, Palisotde Beau-
vois (G, holo. -A, photo.!).
Distribution: D. velutinum is only known from the
north-eastern Lowveld of the Transvaal, up to 750 m,
from near Leydsdorp to the southern boundary of the
15
Kruger National Park. It is widespread throughout the
Old World tropics from Africa and Madagascar to India,
south-east Asia and Malesia.
Vouchers: Junod sub TRV 5279 (PRE); Schrire 655 (NH); Van der
Schijff2659 (PRE).
Note
The plant occurs as a small shrub or suffrutex in
wooded and open grassland, woodland and on forest
margins.
6. Desmodium gangeticum (L.) DC., Prodromus
systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 2: 327 (1825);
Wight & Am.: 225-226 (1834); Bak.: 161 (1871);
Hutch. & Dalz.: 418 (1928); Bak.f.: 327 (1929); Brenan:
420 (1949); Schubert: 196 (1954); Hepper: 584 (1958);
White: 150 (1962); Laundon: 219 (1966); Schubert: 465,
t. 65/10 (1971); Verde.: 520 (1974). Type: Herb. Lin-
naeus 921 .13 (LINN, holo. — A, photo.!).
Hedysarum gangeticum L.: 746 ( 1753).
Hedysarum maculatum L.: 746 (1753). Desmodium gangeticum (L.)
DC. var. maculatum (L.) Bak.: 168 (1876); Hepper: 584 (1958); Laun-
don: 220 (1966). Type: Herb. Linnaeus 921.14 (LINN, holo. -A,
photo.!).
Desmodium tuitalitium Sond.: 32 (1850); Harv.: 229 (1862);
Schindl.: 285 (1928). Type: South Africa, Port Natal, Gueinzius 203
(Herb. Sond.).
Distribution: D. gangeticum occurs in the Transvaal
from the Soutpansberg in the north, through the Lowveld
between Barberton and Nelspruit to Swaziland in the
south. In Natal this distribution continues through nor-
thern Natal to Zululand and then along the coast south-
wards to the Transkei, from 0— 1 200 m.
Vouchers: McDonald 118 (NU, PRE); Schlechter 3129 (BOL,
GRA, PRE); Van der Schijff965 (PRE, PUC); Ward 2406 (NH, PRE);
Wood 4936 (BOL, PRE, SAM).
Notes
(1) The epithets gangeticum and maculatum were
published on the same date and they were combined
under the name Desmodium gangeticum by Wight &
Arn.: 225-226 (1834).
(2) The plant is a spreading suffrutex to erect subshrub
occurring in wooded grassland, bushveld or thicket or in
open grassland. It readily becomes a weed in semi-dis-
turbed areas i.e. old lands or roadsides, and flowers from
August to March.
(3) This species is widespread throughout the Old
World tropics and has been introduced into America.
Allen & Allen (1981) note that D. gangeticum is used as
a pioneer plant to control erosion of denuded areas. The
roots of D. gangeticum yield a lectone and seven alka-
loids. One of these, hordenine, has been used in experi-
mental medicine as a sympathomimetic and another,
bufotenine, is an hallucinogen.
7. Desmodium setigerum (E. Mey.) Benth. ex
Harv. in Flora capensis 2: 229 (1862); Milne-Redh.: 417
(1937); Schubert: 187, t. HE (1954); Hepper: 585
(1958); Laundon: 222 (1966); Schubert: 460, t. 65/5
(1971); Verde.: 513 (1974). Type: Transkei, Umzim-
vubu River, Drege 446 (B, holo.; W,K!).
Nicolsonia setigera E. Mey.: 124(1836).
16
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
Desmodium hirtum auct. non Guill. & Perr.: Bak.: 163 (1871), pro
parte; Wood: 14, t. 212 (1902); Hutch. & Dalz.: 418 (1928); Schindl.:
279(1928): Bak.f.: 329(1929), pro parte; Compton: 272(1976).
Distribution: D. setigerum occurs in the Transvaal
from the Soutpansberg and Tzaneen in the north, through
the area between Lydenburg and Sabie to western Swazi-
land in the south. In Natal it is found from sea level to
2 000 m, except in the lowveld of Zululand, and it
extends to coastal Transkei. It is widespread throughout
tropical Africa.
Vouchers: Bos 1253 (PRE, STE); Compton 30608 (NBG, PRE);
Ross 1679 (NH, NU, PRE); Scheepers 581 (PRE, PRU); Strey 2996
(NH, PRE).
Notes
(1) Misinterpretation of types (Schubert 1971) has led
to confusion between two separate species, Desmodium
setigerum (E. Mey.) Benth. ex Harv. and D. hirtum
Guill. & Perr. This began with D. hirtum sensu Bak.:
163(1871).
(2) The plant is a prostrate or low semi-erect suffrutex
of open grassland in damp sites, occurring occasionally
on streambanks, forest margins or on drier rocky hill-
sides. It is also found in semi-disturbed vegetation on
roadsides and flowers from December to May, i.e. it is a
later summer- flowering species.
8. Desmodium adscendens (Swartz) DC., Prodro-
mus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 2: 332 (1825);
Bak.: 162 (1871); Hutch. & Dalz.: 418 (1928); Bak.f.:
330 (1929); Brenan: 419 (1949); Laundon: 222, t. 20A1
(1966). Type: West Indies, Swartz (S, holo.— GH,
photo.!).
Hedysarum adscendens Swartz: 106 (1788) reprint 1962; Swartz:
1263(1806).
var. robustum Schubert in Bulletin du Jardin bota-
nique de l’Etat, a Bruxelles 22: 290 (1952); Schubert:
190 (1954); Hepper: 585 (1958); Schubert: 461, t. 65/13
(1971); Verde.: 514 (1974). Type: Congo, Kivu,
Mokoto Lakes, Ghesquiere 4994 (BR, holo.).
Distribution: D. adscendens var. robustum is found in
the Soutpansberg and Woodbush areas of the northern
Transvaal and entering from Mozambique along the
Natal coast to the Transkei border. It is widespread in
tropical Africa but the species is pantropical, from
America, Africa, Asia and Malesia.
Vouchers: Gillen 3156 (BOL, PRE, STE); Moll 2720 (NU, PRE);
Moll & Strey 38 96 (NH, PRE); Strey 7151 (NH, NU, PRE); Venter
5291 (PRE, ZULU).
Note
The plant is a straggling herb or undershrub of shaded
mesic forest floors, and flowers from November to
March. On forest margins along the coast, this species
may be confused with the shade form of D. incanum (see
under that species). Schubert (1971) records that D.
adscendens is an excellent food for stock.
9. Desmodium dregeanum Benth. in Plantae Jung-
huhnianae 2: 222 in adnot. (1852); Harv.: 228 (1862);
Bak.: 165 (1871); Schubert: 476, t. 65/3 (1971); Verde.:
528 (1974). Type: Transkei, Umsimkaba River, Drege
(B, holo.; GH, K!). Based on Nicolsonia caffra E. Mey.
Nicolsonia caffra E. Mey.: 123 (1836).
Desmodium caffrum (E. Mey.) Druce: 619 (1917); Schindl.: 360
(1927); Bak.f.: 331 (1929); Brenan: 419 (1949); Laundon: 225(1966),
non Eckl. & Zeyh. (1836), nom. illegit. D. caffrum Eckl. & Zeyh. is a
later homonym of D. repandum (Vahl) DC.
Distribution: D. dregeanum is predominantly a low
altitude plant from coastal Mozambique to the coast of
northern Transkei. It does however occur in the Lyden-
burg, Barberton and Volksrust Districts of the Transvaal
and the hinterland of Natal from 0-1 800 m. It is an
endemic African species occurring widely in eastern and
southern Africa.
Vouchers: Grobbelaar 1104 (PRE, PRU); Rogers 28284 (GRA,
STE); Ross & Moll 1830 (NH, PRE); Strey 4971 (NH, NU, PRE);
Wood 817 (BOL, SAM).
Note
The plant is an erect or straggling herb in open grass-
land most often in moist or marshy areas in sandy soils.
It can become a woody subshrub to 1 m high if protected
from fire and it is common in semi-disturbed grasslands,
roadsides or forest margins. Flowering may occur
throughout the year.
10. Desmodium barbatum (L.) Benth. in Plantae
Junghuhnianae 2: 224 (1852); Schubert: 477 (1971);
Verde.: 530 (1974). Type: Jamaica?, Herb Linnaeus
921.48 (LINN, holo.).
Hedysarum barbatum L.: 1170 (1759).
10a. var. dimorphum (Welw. ex Bak.) Schubert in
Bulletin du Jardin botanique de l’Etat, a Bruxelles 22:
298 (1952); Schubert: 205 (1954); Hepper: 564 (1958);
Schubert: 478 (1971); Verde.: 531 (1974). Type:
Angola, Cuanza Norte, Golungo Alto, Welwitsch 2165
(LISU, lecto.; K!, BM!); Malawi, Manganya, Kirk (K,
syn.!).
Desmodium dimorphum Welw. ex Bak.: 161 (1871); Hutch. &
Dalz.: 417 (1928); Bak.f.: 332 (1929). Nicolsonia barbata (L.) DC.
var. dimorpha (Welw. ex Bak.) Schindl.: 359 (1927). D. barbatum
(L.) Benth. subsp. dimorphum (Welw. ex Bak.) Laundon: 225, t.
20/ A2 (1966).
Distribution: D. barbatum var. dimorphum is found in
the Transvaal from the Letaba District near Tzaneen
south to Lydenburg, Barberton and Nelspruit, from
100-1 000 m.
Vouchers: Kluge 1222 (PRE); Krige 139 (J); Liebenberg 2897
(PRE); Scheepers 241 (PRE, PRU); Schrire 661 (NH).
Note
The plant is a spreading suffrutex to erect subshrub up
to 1 m high, in the grassland component of open wood-
land, and it flowers from February to June.
10b. var. argyreum (Welw. ex Bak.) Schubert in
Bulletin du Jardin botanique de l’Etat, a Bruxelles 22:
298 ( 1 952); Schubert: 205 ( 1 954); Schubert: 479 ( 1 97 1 );
Verde.: 531 (1974). Type: Angola, Huila, Welwitsch
2162 (LISU, holo.; BM!).
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
Desmodium dimorphum Welw. ex Bak. var. argyreum Welw. ex
Bak.: 161 (1871); Bak.f.: 332 (1929). Nicolsonia barbata (L.) DC.
var. argyrae (Welw. ex Bak.) Schindl.: 359 (1927). D. barbaium (L.)
Benth. subsp. dimorphum sensu Laundon: 225 (1966), pro parte.
Distribution: D. barbatum var. argyreum has been
recorded from South West Africa/Namibia.
Voucher: Merxmuller <6 Giess 1862 (WIND).
Notes
(1) The plant is erect with silvery-white or fulvous
stems which are appressed silky-pilose. The leaves are
almost all 1-foliolate with the leaflets densely silvery-
silky beneath. It occurs in woodland or grassland from
1 000- 2 000 m.
(2) Schubert (1971) notes that, although this variety is
quite distinguishable from var. dimorphum in the ex-
treme, there are many plants which form a transition
between the two.
Desmodium uncinatum and D. intortum or Silverleaf
and Greenleaf Desmodium, have been deliberately intro-
duced from central America and cultivated as pasture
legumes in the eastern Cape. This is largely out of the
natural range of the genus in southern Africa, and there
is no evidence that they have become naturalized. Des-
modium asperum was once collected on the south coast
of Natal but it has not been seen again. A large number
of other species of Desmodium are being tested in agri-
cultural stations around the country for their pasture
potential.
PSEUDARTHRIA
Pseudarthria Wight & Arn., Prodromus florae
peninsulae Indiae orientalis 1: 209 (1834); Benth.: 521
(1865); Bak.: 167 (1871); Bak.: 153 (1876); Taub.: 329
(1894); Schindl.: 11 (1914); Hutch. & Dalz.: 386
(1928); Bak.f.: 338 (1929); Burtt Davy: 381 (1932);
Phill.: 419 (1951); J. Leonard: 234 (1954b); Hepper: 585
(1958); White: 161 (1962); Hutch.: 399 (1964); Torre:
231 (1966); Verde.: 64 (1970); Verde.: 483 (1971);
Verde.: 534 (1974); Dyer: 264 (1975). Type species: P.
viscida (L.) Wight & Am. ( Hedysarum viscidum L.).
Hedysarum L.: 745 (1753), pro parte.
Desmodium Desv. in DC.: 325 (1825), pro parte.
Anarthrosyne E. Mey.: 124 (1836); Harv.: 229
(1862), pro parte; Harv.: 82 (1868).
The name Pseudarthria is derived from the Greek
‘pseudo’, meaning false, and ‘arthron’ or joint; the con-
strictions between the seeds give the impression of the
pod being falsely jointed. Only one species occurs in
southern Africa.
Pseudarthria hookeri Wight & Arn., Prodromus
florae peninsulae Indiae orientalis 1: 209 (1834); Bak.:
168 (1871); Schindl.: 11 (1914); Hutch. & Dalz.: 386
(1928); Bak.f.: 339 (1929); Robyns: 313 (1948); Brenan:
436 (1949); J. Leonard: 235, t. 15/A-B (1954b); Hep-
per: 586 (1958); White: 161 (1962); Torre: 232 (1966);
Verde.: 65 (1970); Verde.: 484, t. 69/1-9 (1971);
Verde.: 534 (1974). Type: Mauritius, cultivated from
Zanzibar, Telfair (K, ?holo.!).
17
Anarthrosyne robusta E. Mey.: 125 (1836); Harv.: 229 (1862).
Type: Transkei, Umgazana, Drege 452 (K!).
var. hookeri
Verde, in Kew Bulletin 24: 65 (1970); Verde.: 484, t.
69/1-9 (1971); Verde.: 535 (1974).
Distribution: Pseudarthria hookeri var. hookeri
occurs in the Transvaal from Louis Trichardt and Tza-
neen in the north, between Lydenburg and Skukuza, and
between Middelburg and Komatipoort, to Swaziland and
Piet Retief in the south. The species also occurs from
Petersburg through Nylstroom to Thabazimbi in the
Waterberg Mountains. In Natal the range extends south-
wards through northern Natal and Zululand to the coast
and midlands up to Pietermaritzburg, Richmond, Ixopo
and Harding. Further south the range becomes restricted
to coastal Transkei to the eastern Cape border. This
species occurs widely in tropical and southern Africa,
Madagascar, Mauritius and Reunion.
Vouchers: Bos 1300 (PRE, STE); Galpin 776 (GRA, NH, SAM);
Hemm 555 (J, PRE, VENDA); Moll 2744 (NH, NU, PRE); Schlechter
4551 (BOL, GRA).
Note
This species is found most frequently as a suffrutex or
subshrub to 3 m high, in mixed woodland or bushveld,
along forest margins, in open grassland or as a ruderal
along roadsides or in other disturbed areas, from
0— 2 000 m. It is also occasionally associated with
streambanks, vleis or swampy areas. Flowering occurs
between November and May.
ALYSICARPUS
Alysicarpus Desv., Journal de botanique 1: 120,
t.4.f.8. (1813), nom. conserv.; DC.: 352 (1825); Harv.:
230 (1862); Benth.: 522 (1865); Harv.: 82 (1868); Bak.:
169 (1871); Bak.: 157 (1876); Hutch. & Dalz.: 418
(1928); Bak. f.: 341 (1929); Burtt Davy: 427 (1932);
Phill.: 419 (1951); J. Leonard: 84 (1954a); J. Leonard:
223 (1954b); Hepper: 586 (1958); Hutch.: 482 (1964);
Torre: 234 (1966); Schreiber: 13 (1970); Verde.: 491
(1971); Verde. 544 (1974); Dyer: 264 (1975); Compton:
273 (1976); Dillon: 548 (1980). Type species: A. bupleu-
rifolius (L.) DC. (Hedysarum bupleurifolium L.).
Hedysarum L.: 745 (1753), pro parte.
Fabricia Scop.: 307 (1777); Kuntze: 181 (1891);
Taub.: 329 (1894).
Alysicarpus gets its name from the Greek, ‘halysis’,
meaning chain and ‘karpos’ meaning fruit; the pods are
moniliform with the joints in chain formation.
Note
Alysicarpus Neck.: 15 (1790) is not to be treated as a
generic name, according to ICBN Art. 20, unless it has
been published, as such, by a subsequent author. Noted
in Stafleu (1976) is the following: ‘Since Necker desig-
nated this category as ‘species’, the monomial names
(which are in many cases the generic names of previous
authors) are to be regarded as unitary designations of
species and hence to be regarded as not validly pub-
lished’.
18
KEY TO SPECIES
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
la Fruit with straight margins, not constricted between the articles; calyx lobes narrow, sharply acuminate, not at all
overlapping at the base 1 . A. vaginalis
lb Fruit moniliform, strongly constricted between the articles; calyx lobes ovate-lanceolate, slightly to conspi-
cuously overlapping at the base:
2a Articles smooth; leaves coriaceous with very prominent reticulate venation 2. A. zeyheri
2b Articles with obvious transverse ridge sculpturing; leaves subcoriaceous with reticulate venation only slightly
prominent:
3a Calyx lobes 0,8- 1,5 mm wide, slightly overlapping and imbricate initially, not so in fruit; inflorescences
elongate and spike-like; fruit well exserted from the calyx 4. A. glumaceus
3b Calyx lobes 1 ,5—2,5 mm wide, conspicuously overlapping and imbricate, and rounded or subcordate at the
base; inflorescences often short and compact; fruit only partially exserted from the calyx 3. A. rugosus
SYNOPSIS OF SPECIES
1. Aiysicarpus vaginalis (L.) DC., Prodromus
systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 2; 353 (1825);
Bak.: 170 (1871), pro parte; Hutch. & Dalz.: 419
(1928), pro parte; Bak.f.: 342 (1929), pro parte; Robyns:
331 (1948); J. Leonard: 84 (1954a); J. Leonard: 224, t.
13/A (1954b); Hepper: 587 (1958); Torre: 234 (1966);
Verde.: 493, t. 71 /A (1971); Verde.: 546 (1974); Comp-
ton: 273 (1976). Syntypes: Ceylon, Hermann (BM-
HERM, 1:27,59, syn.).
Hedysarum vaginale L.: 746 ( 1753).
var. vaginalis
Verde, in Kew Bulletin 24: 67 (1970); Verde.: 493, t.
7 1 / A ( 1 97 1 ); Verde . : 443 ( 1 972); Verde . : 546 ( 1 974) .
Distribution: A. vaginalis occurs in the Transvaal
Lowveld through Swaziland and Tongaland to the Zulu-
land coast. It is widespread throughout the Old World
tropics.
Vouchers: Buitendag 302 (NBG, PRE); Clarke 262 (PRE, PRU);
Rogers 25092 (J); Venter 4593 (BLFU, PRE); Ward 1796 (NH, NU,
PRE).
Notes
( 1 ) The plant occurs as a semi-prostrate or decumbent
trailing herb in the herbaceous vegetation of open areas
in bush veld or in grassland up to 800 m. More com-
monly it becomes a weed of disturbed sandy or rocky
soils in these areas, i.e. in alluvia, old lands or along
roadsides. It flowers nearly all year round from July to
May.
(2) A. vaginalis has been introduced into America
where it is reported to have no economic importance
except as a noxious weed (Schubert 1980). In Africa,
however, Schubert (1980) notes that various species in-
cluding A. vaginalis are used locally as, ‘fodder, for all
kinds of domestic stock, used fresh, but preferably cut
after fruiting and stored as hay’. It is also regarded as an
excellent fodder for horses, but it is said to cause mucous
diarrhoea if given in excess in the young and immature
state during the rains. It is also known as Alyce clover,
and Allen & Allen (1981) state that it is considered as a
good cover crop in Malaysia to prevent erosion on clay
soils of rubber plantations.
2. Aiysicarpus zeyheri Harv. in Flora capensis 2:
230 (1862); Bak.: 170 (1871); Hutch. & Dalz.: 419
(1928); Bak.f.: 343 (1929); Robyns: 332(1948); J. Leo-
nard: 228, t. 13/C (1954b); Hepper: 587 (1958); Torre:
235 (1966); Verde.: 494, t. 71/C (1971); Verde.: 549
(1974). Type: Transvaal, Aapies River, Burke & Zevher
(K, syn.!; PRE!).
Although quoted as Burke & Zevher in Flora
capensis, these are two simultaneous but separate collec-
tions and are therefore syntypes.
Distribution: A. zeyheri occurs in the Transvaal and
northern Natal at altitudes between 900-2 400 m. It is
found from Pietersburg southwards to Pretoria, and from
Pretoria westwards to Zeerust in Sourish Mixed Bush-
veld. East of Pretoria it occurs in the North-eastern
Mountain Sourveld and Lowveld Sour Bushveld from
Lydenburg, Nelspruit and Barberton down through Swa-
ziland. It also occurs in the North-eastern Sandy High-
veld, Piet Retief Sourveld and related veld types from
near Middelburg through Ermelo to Louwsburg and
Mahlabatini in the south.
Vouchers: Du Plessis 1136 (PRE. PRU); Galpin 1158 (GRA, NH,
PRE, SAM); Leendert: 399 (BOL, J, PRE); Rudatis 131 (STE); Stern
995 (NBG).
Notes
(1) The plant is an erect to spreading herb of open
areas in bushveld or in grassland in sandy, rocky or
gravel soils, and often occurs in grazed, seasonally
burned grassland, along roadsides or railway lines and in
old lands. It flowers from October through to April.
(2) Watt & Breyer-Brandwijk (1962) report that A.
zeyheri is used as a remedy in South Africa for impo-
tence, while Allen & Allen (1981) quote a reference in
which the species has been used as a snake-bite remedy
in some African communities.
3. Aiysicarpus rugosus (Willd.) DC., Prodromus
systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 2: 353 (1825);
Bak.: 171 (1871), pro parte; J. Leonard: 92, t. 12
(1954a); J. Leonard: 229 (1954b); Hepper: 587 (1958);
Lind & Tallantire: 82 (1962); Torre: 236 (1966);
Schreiber: 14 (1970); Verde.: 495 (1971); Verde.: 550
(1974); Compton: 273 (1976). Type: Guinea, Isert in
Herb. Willdenow (B, holo.).
Hedysarum rugosum Willd.: 1172 (1802).
Aiysicarpus violaceus (Forssk.) Schindl . : 13 (1928), pro parte;
Hutch. & Dalz.: 419 ( 1928), pro parte, non Hedysarum violaceum L.:
749 (1753); Forssk.: 136(1775).
KEY TO SUBSPECIES
Erect annual; calyx lobes with white cilia; SWA/Namibia
only subsp. rugosus
Decumbent spreading perennial with many flexuous stems;
calyx lobes with brown to orange cilia subsp. perennirufus
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
3a. subsp. rugosus
J. Leonard in Bulletin du Jardin botanique de I’Etat, a
Bruxelles 24: 92, t. 12 ( 1954a); J. Leonard: 229 (1954b).
Distribution: the typical subspecies is recorded in the
Flora area only from the Grootfontein District in South
West Africa/Namibia. A specimen, Liebenberg 2789
(PRE), from Barberton in the Transvaal may also be
subsp. rugosus, but it is too underdeveloped to be identi-
fied with certainty. Subsp. rugosus is an erect annual in
open areas in thornveld savanna or in swamps.
Vouchers: Dimer 7628 (BOL, PRE, WIND); Merxmiiller & Giess
30098 (WIND).
3b. subsp. perennirufus J. Leonard in Bulletin du
Jardin botanique de l’Etat, a Bruxelles 24: 95 (1954a); J.
Leonard: 230, t. 13/D (1954b); Torre: 236 (1966);
Verde.: 496, t. 71/D (1971); Verde.: 552 (1974). Type:
Congo, Kivu, Rutshuru, Lebrun 9021 (BR, holo.; K!).
Alysicarpus wallichi Wight & Am.: 234 (1834); Harv.: 230 (1862).
Types: Wallich cat. 5763 a, b (K-WALLICH!).
Alysicarpus glaber E. Mey.: 125 (1836). Type: Transkei, between
Umzimvubu and Umsikaba Rivers, Drege (K!).
Alysicarpus violaceus (Forssk.) Schindl.: 13 (1928), pro parte;
Hutch. & Dalz.: 419 (1928), pro parte, non Hedysarum violaceum L.:
749 (1753); Forssk.: 136(1775).
Distribution: this subspecies is widespread in the east-
ern half of the Flora area, from the Transvaal, Swazi-
land, Natal to the eastern Cape. In the Transvaal it
occurs from Louis Trichardt and Tzaneen in the north
through Pietersburg and Potgietersrust to Lydenburg and
Komatipoort and to Swaziland in the south. Westwards it
occurs from Belfast and Ermelo through Pretoria to Rus-
tenburg with a slight extension into the higher altitude
Bankenveld north of Johannesburg and Potchefstroom.
The distribution in Natal is chiefly northern Natal from
Newcastle to Pongola (an extension of the range in the
south-east Transvaal) through the midlands to the coast.
It does not occur further west of a line extending from
Bergville, Estcourt and Richmond, i.e. into the uplands,
nor does it occur further north than Hluhluwe in Zulu-
land. Along the coast and adjacent interior, particularly
where there are projections inland of Valley Bushveld,
the distribution continues down to East London and
inland to the Harding, Umtata, Engcobo and Fort Beau-
fort Districts.
Vouchers: Acocks 9872 (NH, PRE); Flanagan 416 (GRA, PRE,
SAM); Galpin 12975 (BOL, PRE); Moll 1505 (NH, NU, PRE); Tyson
2002 (BOL, NBG, PRE).
Note
Verdcourt (1971) mentions that intermediates occur
between the two subspecies in the Flora of tropical east
Africa. He notes that a few examples have been found in
the Transvaal.
4. Alysicarpus glumaceus (Vahl) DC., Prodromus
systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 2: 353 (1825);
Robyns: 332 (1948), pro parte; J. Leonard: 98, t. 13
(1954a); J. Leonard: 231, t. 13/E (1954b); Hepper: 587
(1958); Lind & Tallantire: 82 (1962); Torre: 236 (1966);
Verde.: 497, t. 71/E (1971); Verde.: 553 (1974). Type:
Yemen, Surdud, Forsskdl (C, holo.).
Hedysarum violaceum Forssk.: 136 (1775) non L., nom. illegit.
Type as above.
Hedysarum glumaceum Vahl: 106 ( 1 79 1 ).
19
Alysicarpus violaceus (Forssk.) Schindl.: 13 (1928), pro parte;
Bak.f.: 342 (1929), pro parte.
subsp. glumaceus var. glumaceus
Verde, in Kew Bulletin 24: 68 (1970); Verde.: 497, t.
71/E (1971); Verde.: 553 (1974).
Distribution: Alysicarpus glumaceus is found in the
hot lowlands of northern Botswana, Transvaal, Swazi-
land and Natal. In South Africa it occurs from Phala-
borwa in the north through Setara and between Louw’s
Creek and Komatipoort to eastern Swaziland; and in
Tongaland and coastal Zululand, south to Eshowe.
Vouchers: Bredenkamp 1847 (PRE); Cooley 726 (NH, NU); Schrire
909 (NH); Venter 3765 (ZULU); Ward 1891 (NH, NU).
Notes
(1) Only the typical taxon is found in the Flora area.
(2) This species occurs as an erect annual herb of open
places in bushveld or in grassland, and is often asso-
ciated with moisture, i.e, floodplains, depressions,
saline marshes or near streams. It is also a weed of old
lands or along roadsides. Flowering occurs from
November to June.
(3) Allen & Allen (1981) report that this is also known
as Alyce clover and, like A. vaginalis, is said to be
cultivated as a summer graze for domestic animals. Watt
& Breyer-Brandwijk (1962) state that A. glumaceus is
used in east Africa as a remedy for thrush and veld sores.
In Arabia and India the herb is used as an external appli-
cation to swollen feet.
Subtribe Lespedezinae
Lespedezinae {Hutch.) Schubert in Advances in
legume sy stematics 1 : 300 (1981).
Lespedezeae Hutch.: 486 (1964).
LESPEDEZA
Lespedeza Michx., Flora boreali-americana 2: 70
(1803); Hutch.: 487 (1964); Clewel: 365 (1966). Type
species: L. procumbens Michx.
Hedysarum L.: 745 (1753), pro parte.
The name Lespedeza is derived from Vincento Manuel
de Cespedes, governor of the Florida Colony from
1784-1790 and patron of the botanist Michaux. The
current spelling of the genus name presumably resulted
from illegibility or a printer’s error (Allen & Allen
1981).
Lespedeza cuneata {Du Mont.) G. Don, A general
system of gardening and botany 2: 307 (1832); Wilbur:
185 (1963). Type: Japan, Nagasaki, Oldham 328 (K!).
Hedysarum sericeum Thunb.: 287 (1784), nom. illegit.
Anthyllis cuneata Dumont de Courset: 100 ( 1 8 1 1 ).
Lespedeza sericea auct. non Benth.: 227 (1852): (Thunb.) Miq.: 49
(1867).
Distribution: L. cuneata is an escape from cultivation,
now naturalized in the Natal midlands in the Kokstad.
Ixopo and Pietermaritzburg Districts.
Vouchers: Edwards 12 (NH); Hilliard 3888 (NU); Schrire 1368
(NH); Tainton s.n. (NU).
20
Notes
(1) The plant occurs in old lands, along roadsides or
old railway lines. It is an herbaceous suffrutex to 0,8 m
high, flowering from February to April.
(2) L. cuneata is native to eastern Asia but is widely
cultivated in the United States. Known as Japanese bush-
clover, it is the most widespread and familiar of all the
species and is used extensively to control erosion on
roadside banks and similar areas (Wilbur 1963). It is also
held in high esteem as a forage, hay and protein supple-
ment to stockfeed (Allen & Allen 1981).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
My sincere thanks to the following for much valuable
assistance and constructive criticism: Prof. E. Hennessy,
Dr B. Schubert, Dr H. P. Linder, Mrs E. Potgieter, Mr
G. Nichols, MrC. Buthelezi and Mr A. Ngwenya.
REFERENCES
ACOCKS, J. 1975. Veld types of South Africa, 2nd edn. Memoirs of
the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 40: 1-128.
ADANSON, M. 1763. Families des plantes 2: 327-328, 509.
ALLEN, O. N. & ALLEN, E. K. 1981. The Leguminosae. A source -
book of characteristics, uses and nodulation. Macmillan, Lon-
don.
AUBLET, J. B. C. F. 1775. Histoire des plantes de la Guiane fran-
gaise 2: 774. London & Paris.
BAKER, E. G. 1929. The Leguminosae of tropica! Africa 2: 324-339.
Erasmus Press, Ostend.
BAKER, J. G. 1871. Leguminosae. In D. Oliver, Flora of tropical
Africa 2: 159-171. Reeve, London.
BAKER, J. G. 1876. Leguminosae. In J. D. Hooker, Flora of British
India 2: 142- 175. Reeve, London.
BEAUVOIS, A. M. F. J. P. DE 1805. Flore d'Oware et de Benin en
Afrique 1: 326. Paris.
BENTHAM, G. 1852. Leguminosae. In F. A. W. Miquel, Plantae
Junghuhnianae 2: 205-269. Leiden.
BENTHAM, G. 1865. In G. Bentham & J. D. Hooker, Genera planta-
rum 1, 2: 449-450, 519-522. Reeve, London.
BRENAN, J. P. M. 1949. In J. P. M. Brenan & P. J. Greenway,
Check-lists of the forest trees and shrubs of the British Empire No.
5. Tanganyika Territory Part II: 419-436. Imperial Forestry
Institute, Oxford.
BURTT DAVY, J. 1932. A manual of the flowering plants and ferns of
the Transvaal with Swaziland, South Africa. Vol. 2. Longmans
Green, London.
CLEWELL, A. F. 1966. Native North American species of Lespedeza
(Leguminosae). Rhodora 68: 359-405.
COMPTON, R. H. 1976. The Flora of Swaziland. Journal of South
African Botany Supplementary Vol. No. 11: 272-273.
DE CANDOLLE, A. P. 1825. Prodromus systematis naturalis regni
vegetabilis 2: 326-353. Paris.
DESVAUX, N. A. 1813. Journal de botanique, applique a T agricul-
ture, a la pharmacie, a la medecine et aux arts 1 : 120-122. Paris.
DILLON, M. O. 1980. Leguminosae for the Flora of Panama. Annals
of Missouri Botanical Garden 61: 548—55 1 .
DON, G. 1832. A general system of gardening and botany 2: 307.
Rivington, London.
DRUCE, G. C. 1917. Nomenclatural notes: chiefly African and
Australian. Reports of the Botanical Society and Exchange Club
of the British Isles 1916 4: 619. Oxford.
DUMONT DE COURSET, G. L. M. 181 1. Le botaniste cultivateur,
edn 2, 6: 100. Paris.
DYER, R. A. 1975. The genera of southern African flowering plants.
Vol. I . Department of Agricultural Technical Services, Pretoria.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
ECKLON, C. F. & ZEYHER, K. L. P. 1836. Enumeratio plantarum
africae australis extratropicae 2: 25 1—252.
FABRICIUS, P. C. 1759. Enumeratio methodica plantarum : 168.
Helmstedt.
FORSSKAL, P. 1775. Flora aegyptiaca-arabica: 136. Copenhagen.
GMELIN, J. F. 1791. In C. Linnaeus, Systema naturae , edn 13, 2:
1124. Leipzig.
GUILLEMIN, J. A. & PERROTTET, G. S. 1832. Florae Senegam-
biae tentamen 6: 209. Paris.
HARVEY, W. H. 1862. Leguminosae. In W. H. Harvey & O. W.
Sonder, Flora capensis 2: 227-230. Hodges, Smith, Dublin.
HARVEY, W. H. 1868. The genera of South African plants, edn 2.
Juta, Cape Town.
HEPPER, F. N. 1958. Papilionaceae. In J. IJutchinson & J. M. Dal-
ziel. Flora of West tropical Africa, edn 2, 1: 582—587. Crown
Agents for Overseas Governments and Administrations.
HUTCHINSON, J. 1964. Fabaceae. In, The genera of flowering plants
Vol. 1. Clarendon, London.
HUTCHINSON, J. & DALZIEL, J. M. 1928. Papilionaceae. In Flora
of west tropical Africa, edn 1, Vol. 1. Crown Agents for the
Colonies, London.
JACQUIN, N. J. 1776. Hortus botanicus vindobonensis 3: 47, t. 89.
Vienna.
KNAAP-VAN MEEUWEN, M. S. 1962. Preliminary revisions of
some genera of Malaysian Papilionaceae V -a census of the genus
Desmodium. Reinwardtia 6: 239—276.
KUNTZE, C. E. O. 1891. Revisio generum plantarum. Vol. 1. Leip-
zig.
LAUNDON, J. R. 1966. Hedysareae. In A. W. Exell & A. Fernandez,
Conspectus florae Angolensis 3: 217—227. Lisbon.
LEONARD, J. 1954a. Notulae Systematicae XV, Papilionaceae -
Hedysareae Africanae. Bulletin du Jardin botanique de I'Etat, a
Bruxelles 24: 84— 102.
LEONARD, J. 1954b. Hedysareae. In, Flore du Congo Beige et du
Ruanda-U rundi 5: 223—238. Brussels.
LIND, E. M. & TALLANTIRE, A. C. 1962. Some common flowering
plants of Uganda. Oxford University Press, London.
LINDLEY, J. 1826. A natural system of botany, edn 2. London.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum. (Facsimile edn 1959) 2:
745-746. London.
LINNAEUS, C. 1759. Systema naturae, edn 10, 2: 1 170. Stockholm.
LUNAN, J. 1814. Hortus Jamaicensis 1: 305. Jamaica.
MEYER, E. H. F. 1836. Commentariorum de plantis Africae austra-
lioris 1: 123-124. Leipzig.
MICHAUX, A. 1803. Flora boreali-americana 2: 70. Paris & Stras-
bourg.
MILNE-REDHEAD, E. 1937. Tropical African plants: XVII. Bulletin
of Miscellaneous Information No. 7: 417. Royal Botanic Gardens,
Kew.
MIQUEL, F. A. W. 1867. Annales Musei botanici Lugduno-Batavi 3:
49. Amsterdam.
NECKER, N. J. DE 1790. Elementa botanica 3: 15. Neuwied.
NICHOLSON, D. H. 1978. Illegitimate ‘basionyms’, impact on
priority and author citation, or the rise of Desmodium incanum
and fall of D. canum (Fabaceae). Taxon 27: 365-370.
OHASHI, H. 1971a. A taxonomic study of the tribe Coronilleae
(Leguminosae) with a special reference to pollen morphology.
Journal of the Faculty of Science, Tokyo University III. 11:
25-92.
OHASHI, H. 1971b. A monograph of the subgenus Dollinera of the
genus Desmodium (Leguminosae). Bulletin. University Museum.
University of Tokyo 2: 259—320.
OHASHI, H. 1973. The Asiatic species of Desmodium and its allied
genera. Ginkgoana 1: 1—318.
OHASHI, H., POLHILL, R. M. & SCHUBERT, G. B. 1981, Desmo-
dieae. In R. M. Polhill & P. H. Raven, Advances in legume
systematics 1: 292-300. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
PHILLIPS, E. P. 1951 . The genera of South African flowering plants,
edn 2. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 25:
418-419.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
PLUMIER, C. 1757. In J. Burman, Plantarum americanarum fascicu-
lus primus (—decimus) 6: 140, t. 149, f. 1. Leiden.
POIRET, J. L. M. 1805. In J. B. A. P. M. de Lamarck, Encyclopedic
methodique . Botanique 6: 422. Paris.
ROBYNS, W. 1948. Flore des Spermatophytes du Parc National
Albert. Brussels.
SCHINDLER, A. K. 1914. Das Genus Pseudarthria Wight & Am.
Repertorium specierum novarum regni vegetabilis Beihefte 2:
1-20.
SCHINDLER, A. K. 1927. Desmodii generumque affinum species et
combinationes novae. III. Repertorium specierum novarum regni
vegetabilis 23: 359—360.
SCHINDLER, A. K. 1928. Die Desmodiinen in der botanischen Lite-
ratur nach Linne. Repertorium specierum novarum regni vege-
tabilis Beihefte 49: 1-371.
SCHINZ, H. & THELLUNG, A. 1913. In G. Schellenberg, H. Schinz
& A. Thellung, Memoires de la Societe neuchateloise des science
naturelles 5: 371 .
SCHINZ, H. & THELLUNG, A. 1913. Neues aus: G. Schellenberg,
H. Schinz & A. Thellung, Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Flora von
Colombien und Westindien. Repertorium specierum novarum
regni vegetabilis 12: 428.
SCHREIBER, A. 1970. Fabaceae. In H. Merxmuller, Flora von Siid-
westafrika 60: 13— 31 . Cramer, Lehre.
SCHRIRE, B. D. 1984 . A taxonomic revision of the tribe Desmodieae
( Leguminosae- Papilionoideae ) M.Sc. Thesis. University of Dur-
ban-Westville, South Africa.
SCHUBERT, B. G. 1950. Desmodium : Preliminary studies III. Rho-
dora 52: 135—155.
SCHUBERT, B. G. 1952. Notes on Desmodium and Droogmansia in
the Belgian Congo. Bulletin du Jardin botanique de I'Etat, a
Bruxelles 22: 287-307.
SCHUBERT, B. G. 1954. Desmodium. Flore du Congo Beige et du
Ruanda-UrundiS: 180-205.
SCFIUBERT, B. G. 1963. Desmodium : preliminary studies IV. Jour-
nal of the Arnold Arboretum. Harvard University 44: 287-297.
SCHUBERT, B. G. 1971. Desmodium. In E. Milne-Redhead & R. M.
Polhill, Flora of tropical east Africa , Leguminosae -Papilionoi-
deae 1: 451-479. Crown Agents for Overseas Governments and
Administrations, London.
SCHUBERT, B. G. 1980. Desmodium. In Flora of Panama. Annals of
Missouri Botanical Garden 67: 622-662.
SCHUBERT, B. G. 1981. Desmodieae. In R. M. Polhill & P. H.
Raven, Advances in legume systematics 1: 292—300. Royal
Botanic Gardens, Kew.
SCHUBERT, B. G. & VERDCOURT, B. 1971. Desmodieae. In E.
Milne-Redhead & R. M. Polhill, Flora of tropical east Africa ,
Leguminoseae- Papilionoideae 1: 450-501. Crown Agents for
Overseas Governments and Administrations, London.
SCHULZ-MENZ, G. K. 1964. Coronilleae. In H. Melchior, Engler’s
Syllabus der Pflamenfamilien 2: 236—237. Bomtraeger, Berlin.
SCOPOLI, G. A. 1777. Introductio ad historiam naturalem: 307.
Prague.
SONDER, O. W. 1850. Beitrage zur Flora von Siidafrica. Linnaea 23:
32.
STAFLEU, F. A. (ed.) 1976. Taxonomic literature. Regnum Vegeta-
bile Vol. 52. International Bureau for Plant Taxonomy and
Nomenclature, Utrecht.
STAFLEU, F. A. (ed.) 1983. International Code of Botanical Nomen-
clature. Regnum Vegetabile 111. Junk, The Hague & Boston.
SWARTZ, O. P. 1788. Nova genera et species plantarum sen prodro-
mus : 106-107. Stockholm, Uppsala & Abo. Facsimile reprint,
Weinheim 1962.
SWARTZ, O. P. 1806. Flora Ituliae occidentalis 3: 1263. Erlangen.
TAUBERT, P. 1894. In A. Engler & K. A. E. Prantl, Die natiirlichen
Pflamenfamilien 3, 3: 325 — 330. Berlin
THUNBERG, C. P. 1784. Flora Japonica: 287. Facsimile edn 1933,
Tokyo.
TORRE, A. R. DA 1966. Hedysareae. In A. W. Exell & A. Fer-
nandes, Conspectus florae Angolensis 3: 231—237. Lisbon.
VAHL, M. 1791. Symbolae botanicae 2: 82. Copenhagen.
21
VERDCOURT, B. 1970. Studies in the Leguminosae-Papiltonoideae
for the Flora of tropical east Africa: 1 . Kew Bulletin 24: 64 - 70.
VERDCOURT, B. 1971. Desmodieae (except Desmodium). In E.
Milne-Redhead & R. M Polhill, Flora of tropical east Africa
Leguminosae- Papilionoideae 1: 483—501. Crown Agents for
Overseas Governments and Administrations, London.
VERDCOURT, B. 1972. Studies in the Leguminosae- Papilionoi-
deae-Hedysareae (sensu lato) for the Flora Zambesiaca: 2. Kew
Bulletin 27: 443-445.
VERDCOURT, B. 1974. Hedysareae of Flora Zambesiaca. Kirkia 9:
505-554.
WATT, J. M. & BREYER-BRANDW1JK, M. G. 1962. The medicinal
and poisonous plants of southern and eastern Africa. Livingstone,
Edinburgh & London.
WERGER, M. J. A. 1978. Biogeographical division of southern
Africa. In M. J. A. Werger, Biogeography and ecology of
southern Africa: 147- 170. Junk, The Hague.
WIGHT, R. & ARNOTT, G. A. W. 1834. Prodromus florae penin-
sulae Indiae orientalis 1: 209-234. Parbury & Allen, London.
WILBUR, R. L. 1963. The leguminous plants of North Carolina.
North Carolina agricultural experiment station technical bulletin
151:171-195.
WILLDENOW, C. L. 1802. Caroli a Linne Species plantarum . . .
editio quarto 3: 1172-1174. Berlin.
WHITE, F. 1962. Forest flora of Northern Rhodesia. Oxford Univer-
sity Press. London.
WOOD, J. M. 1902. Natal plants 3: 14. Bennett & Davis, Durban.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
Specimens are listed alphabetically according to the
name of the collector for each genus. Figures in brackets
after the collector’s number refer to the number of the
taxon in the text.
Desmodium
Acocks 9648( 1) PRE; 10118(1) NH; 10888(2) PRE; 10899(9)
PRE; 13332(1) PRE. Ahrens 23(1) NU. Allsopp 969(9) NU;
999(6) NH, NU, PRE; 101 7(9) NH; 1024(1) NH, NU.
Baijnath 185(1) NU, PRE. Balsinhas 2804(2) PRE; 3223a(4)
PRE. Barker 5155(1) NBG; 6138(2) NBG; 10012(9) NBG.
Baur 114(\) BOL, GRA. Bayliss 2757(1) NBG, PRE; 4667(1)
NBG. Blenkinson J 14446(1) J. Bokelmann, NBG 67393(1)
NBG. Bolus 7731(6) BOL; 8882(9) BOL; 8883(1) BOL;
8884(1) BOL; 11827(1) BOL, PRE; STE 24837(1) STE. Bos
1230(1) PRE, STE; 1253(1) PRE, STE. Botha 2583(1) PUC.
Bourquin 122(1) NU; 253(2) NU; 357(9) NU. Bourquin &
Lawson 1168(1) NH, PRE; 1171(9) NH, PRE. Breyer sub TRV
17848(10) PRE; sub TRV 79552(1) PRE. Buitendag 209(6)
NBG, PRE; 277(6) PRE, 7755(4) NBG, PRE.
Clarke 269(6) PRU; 371(1) PRE, PRU; 373(1) PRE, PRU;
464(2) PRE, PRU. Codd 1076(1) PRE; 6412(1) PRE; 9312(9)
PRE; 9339(1) GRA, PRE; 9362(2) NH, PRE. Codd & De
Winter 5144(10) PRE. Codd & Muller 325(1) PRE. Coleman
13(9) NH, PRE; 65(7) NH, PRE; 1103(3) NH. Collins sub TRV
9895(1) PRE. Comins 1956(9) GRA, PRE. Compton 25075(1)
NBG; 25675(1) PRE, SAM; 27257(1) NBG, PRE; 25692(1)
NBG, PRE; 30608(1) NBG, PRE. Cooper 204(1) PRE. Craw-
ford 368(2) PRE. Culverwell 1235(4) PRE.
Denley in J 30699(9) J. Devenish 1647(1) NU; 579(1) NH,
PRE. De Winter & Killick 8922(1) PRE. Dlamini in NBG 491 74
(1) NBG; in NBG 49172(1) NBG; in PRE 55645(1) PRE. Dohse
& Lindahl 94(1) NH, PRE; 95(1) NH, PRE. Dutton 47(9) NH.
Dyer 3153(1) PRE.
22
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
Edwards D. 1312(1) NU, PRE; 3250(9) NU, PRE. Eicker s.n.( 9)
ZULU. Elan-Puttick 16(1) PRE. Eliovson J 26989(1) J. Ellis
2616a(2) PRE. Esterhuysen 12875(1) BOL, PRE. Evans 112(1)
NH; 181(9) NH.
Fairall 13(6) NBG. Fisher B.S. 590(2) NH, NU; 752(6) NH.
Fisher D.K. SAM 66046(1) SAM. Fitzsimons & Van Dam sub
TRV 26257(1) PRE. Flanagan 575(1) BOL, GRA, NBG, NU,
PRE, SAM; 2574(9) NH, PRE, SAM; 2608(1) PRE, SAM; PRE
55637(1) PRE. Forbes 35(2) NH, PRE; 605(2) NH ; STE 13501
(2) STE. Forrester & Gooyen 187(1) PRE. Fourcade 233(1)
BOL, GRA. Frith 121(7) J.
Galpin 1287(1) PRE; 3479(1) BOL; 6303(1) PRE; 9743(2)
PRE; 70090(1) PRE; 11005(9) PRE; 11019(2) PRE; 11024
(7) PRE; 11444(1) PRE; 14457(1) BOL, PRE; 77555(1) BOL,
PRE; 11933(1) PRE. Gemmell BLFU 5349(1) BLFU; BLFU
6050(9) BLFU. Gerstner 626(1) PRE; 2936(6) NH; 3845(1)
NH; 6005(1) PRE; NH 28779(1) NH. Getliffe 113(2) NU;
NU 27810(9) NU. Giffen 837(1) PRE. Gill NH 22592(1) NH.
Gillett Mrs. 1203(2) BOL, NH. Gillett J.B. 3156(8) BOL, PRE,
STE. Gordon-Gray 94(2) NU; 97(2) NU; 1047(6) NU; 1308
(7) NU. Grobbelaar 59(9) PRU; 66(7) PRE, PRU; 75(7) PRE,
PRU; 727(2) PRE, PRU; 279(9) PRE, PRU; 284(2) PRE, PRU;
649(9) PRE, PRU; 999(9) PRE, PRU; 1104(9) PRE, PRU;
1337(2) PRU; 1807(2) PRU; 7527(9) PRE, PRU; 2312(1)
PRU; 2324(1) PRU; 2329(9) PRU. Guy 34(1) NU, PRE.
Hanekom 2299(1) PRE. Harrison 244(9) NH, PRE. Hay garth
sub Wood 7067(4) BOL, PRE. Heygarth W. STE 9446(1) STE.
Henderson 55(1) BLFU. Hilliard 1095(9) NU; 1134(9) NU;
7227(7) NU; 1336(9) NU; 1344(1) NU; 7565(1) NH, NU;
1951(1) NU; 2639(1) NU. Hilliard & Burtt 3310(1) NU; 6852
(4) NU. Hitchins 391(6) PRE. Hofmeyer PRE 55621(1) PRE.
Holt 207(10) PRE. Howlett 76(1) NH, NU, PRE; 26(1) PRE;
706(1) NH, PRE. Huntley 195(1) NH, PRE; 656(2) NU.
Hutchinson 1759(2) BOL; 2245(8) BOL, PRE.
Jacobs 1757(1) PRE. Jacobsen 2671(1) PRE. Jarman & Guy 71
(2) NU. Jenkins 7068(1) PRE; sub TRV 7072(9) PRE. Johnson
369(2) NBG; 391(9) NBG. Junod 46(1) PRE; 752(1) PRE;
4357(1) PRE; 4382(1) PRE; 5265(7) PRE; 5267(10) PRE;
5270(6) PRE; sub TRV 5279(5) PRE; sub TRV 5284(10) PRE.
Kalf 35(1) NU; 56(9) NU; 55(2) NU. Keit NH 11142(9) NH.
Kemp 1153(1) PRE. Killick 144(1) NU, PRE; 1667(1) PRE.
Kluge 467(1) PRE, PRU; 455(7) PRE, PRU; 7222(10) PRE.
Kotze 57(4) WIND. Krige 139(10) J.
Lang sub TRV 32297(6) PRE. L’Ange 86(1) NU. Lawn 3(9)
NH; 52(2) NH; 72(1) NH; 769(7) NH; 27 7(7) NH; 752(2)
NH; 1807(9) NH; 2057(9) NH. Lawson 307(2) NU; 479(9)
NH; 704(9) NH. Leighton 2993(9) BOL; 5055(2) BOL, PRE.
Leistner 648(1) PRE. Letty 248(1) PRE; 460(1) PRE. Lewis
SAM 61374(1) SAM; SAM 61553(1) SAM; 61554(2) SAM;
SAM 68719(1) SAM; SAM 69720(1) SAM. Liebenberg 2374
(10) PRE; 2557(7) PRE; 2597(10) PRE; 2947(1) PRE; 5045
(9) PRE. Louw 2165(1) PUC, STE; 2730(1) PUC, STE.
Macgregor 64(9) NU. Martin A. J. 061(8) NU. Martin B. 191(2)
NBG. Mauve 4099(9) PRE. McClean 183(1) PRE; 439(9) NH;
496(9) NH. McDonald 118(6) E, K, NU, PRE. Medley Wood 93
(9) BOL, SAM; NH 163(9) NH; 209(9) BOL, SAM; 505(1)
BOL, SAM; 644(2) BOL, SAM; 790(1) BOL; 57 7(9) BOL,
SAM; 5070(4) NH, SAM; 5705(1) NH; 5729(9)NH; 3134(2)
NH; 4936(6) BOL, PRE, SAM; 4936(6) GRA; 5550(1) PRE;
5597(9) PRE; NH 6416(1) NH; 9755(7) NBG; 77545(9) PRE.
Merxmiiller & Giess 1862(10) WIND. Miller PRE 55638(2) PRE.
Miller O.B. 4279(1) PRE. Mogg 4399(1) PRE; 4597(7) PRE;
77927(9) PRE; 72700(9) PRE; 75072(9) PRE; 75455(9) PRE;
55954(1) J; 556277(1)J. Mohle 268(1) PRE. Moll 2471(6)
PRE; 2720(8) NU, PRE; 5459(1) NU, NH; 4767(9) NH, PRE;
5406(1) NH; 5470(2) NH; 5427(1) NH. Moll & Nel 5610(4)
NH, PRE. Moll & Strey 3896(8) NH, PRE. Morgan 70(1) PRE.
Morris 175(6) NU; 790(2) NU; 795(9) NU. Moss 3298(1) J;
3298(2) J, PRE; J 3299(9) J; 5500(1) PRE; J 14213(1) J;
J 15784(1) J; J 75075(1) J. Mtombeni 26(2) ZULU; 40(7)
ZULU. Muller 2352(1) PRE. Muller & Giess 544(4) PRE, WIND.
Netshiungani (1) VEND A. Nichols 423(8) NH; 455(3) NH;
477(1) NH. Nicholson 105(9) NH; 7200(7) PRE.
Oatley 26(9) PRE. Obermeyer sub TRV 29363(6) PRE; sub
TRV 30325(1) PRE; sub TRV 30371(1) PRE. Otto 124(1)
PRE.
Parkhouse NBG 16886(9) NBG. Phillips E.P. PRE 55667(1)
PRE. Phillips J. J 35347(1) J. Pole- Evans 970(1) PRE; 4549(1)
PRE. Pott 5334(6) PRE; 5555(1) PRE. Prosser 1840(1) PRE.
Randles 10(1) NU. Rehmann 8699(1) BOL. 7 lepton 5862(1)
PRE. Rogers 1259(9) PRE; 77606(9)J; 15059(9) J; 15060(2)
SAM; 75067(2) J; 75470(9) PRE; sub TRV 20707(6) PRE;
23564(6) NH; 26050(10) PRE; 28284(9) GRA, STE. 7 loss 78
(2) NU; 208(1) NU; 723(1) BLFU, NH, NU; 775(7) NU; 1679
(1) NH, NU, PRE; 7522(9) NH, PRE; 7994(1) NH, PRE; NU
25765(1) NU; NU 25769(1) NU. Ross & Moll 1830(9) NH,
PRE; 7547(8) NH, PRE; 226 7(2) NH, PRE. Rudatis 68(9) STE;
775(1) STE; 255(9) PRE; 554(1) PRE; STE 2339(1) STE.
Rump NH 21063(9) NH; 14-7-1929(9) NY; Feb. 1931(9) NU.
Rycroft 2420(4) NBG; 2601(2) NBG.
Sanderson 570(1) NH. S.A.R. PRE 55639(2) PRE. Scheepers
247(10) PRE, PRU; 245(1) PRE, PRU; 557(7) PRE, PRU;
Scheepers & Haasbroek Alkaloid survey SKF no. 1140(1) PRE.
Schelpe 51(9) BOL. Schlechter 3129(6) BOL, GRA, PRE; 5554
(7) PRE; 4742(1) PRE; 6665(7) BOL; 72705(8) SAM; 12275
(10) BOL, SAM. Schonken 75(1) STE. Schonland 845(1) GRA,
PRE. Schrire 153(6) NH; 262(2) NH; 263(2) NH; 264(2) NH;
265(2) NH; 266(2) NH; 267(7) NH; 265(8) NH; 272(2) NH;
273(1) NH; 274(1) NH; 275(2) NH; 276(2) NH; 277(9) NH;
278(2) NH; 255(7) NH; 254(9) NH; 285(9) NH; 256(9) NH;
257(9) NH; 255(2) NH; 259(9) NH; 290(8) NH; 297(2) NH;
292(8) NH; 293(2) NH; 294(9) NH; 296(9) NH; 297(8) NH;
552(2) NH; 555(1) NH; 540(2) NH; 550(2) NH; 556(9) NH;
552(9) NH; 555(4) NH; 386(8) NH; 392(2) NH; 596(7) NH;
599(1) NH; 655(5) NH; 667(10) NH; 6 77(2)NH; 776(9) NH;
77 7(2) NH; 555(9) NH; 557(9) NH; 552(7) NH; 555(6) NH.
Shuter 59(9) NU. Sidey 3876(2) PRE; 3976(9) NH, PRE; 4186
(9) PRE. Sim 4057(1) GRA, PRE. Smith 693(4) PRE; 2557(4)
PRE. Stanton 70(1) NU. Stephen, Van Groan & Schwabe 1197
(9) PRE. Stirton 39(1) NU; 462(9) PRE; 505(2) PRE; 556(9)
PRE; 7 755a(l) PRE; 77556(1) PRE; 5562(2) PRE; 5655(10)
NH. Strey 2996(1) NH, PRE; 5725(1) PRE; 3873(9) NH, PRE;
4705(1) PRE; 4559(2) NH, PRE; 4887(9) NH, PRE; 4971(9)
NH, NU, PRE; 5486(1) NH, PRE; 6554(2) NH, PRE; 7151(8)
NH, NU, PRE; 7394(2) NH, PRE; 7545(1) NH; 5550(1) NH,
PRE; 9618(1) NH, NU, PRE; 10752(1) NH, NU, PRE; 10937
(7) NH, PRE. Swierstra PRE 55605(1) PRE.
Taylor R.H. 85(9) NU. Theron 1600(1) PRE; 5672(1) ERE,
PRU. Thode A31 7(1) NH, PRE; STE 3802(9) STE; STE 3803
(1) STE; STE 3805(9) STE; STE 6443(1) STE. Thomcroft
893(1) NH; Gov. Herb. 11361(1) PRE. Thorpe NH 29880(1)
NH. Tiriley 343(8) PRE; 7457(4) WIND. Tomlinson 2/ 115(9)
NH. Trauseld 575(1) PRE. Tyson 1165(1) BOL; 7455(7)
SAM, STE; 7459(1) SAM, STE; 7525(1) PRE, SAM; 2744(1)
BOL; 2752(7) PRE, SAM; 2576(1) SAM; 5757(1) PRE.
Vahrmeijer 541(8) PRE; 667(4) NH, PRE. Vahrmeijer & Hardy
1627(9) PRE. Vahrmeijer & Tolken 559(4) PRE; 5252(9) PRE.
Van der Merwe D.D. PRE 58466(6) PRE. Van der Merwe P.
312(1) PRE. Van der Schijff 965(6) PRE, PUC; 1132(6) PRE;
7525(6) PRE; 2025(9) PRE; 2479(10) PRE; 2659(5) PRE;
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
23
4332(1) PRE, PRU; 4941(1) PRE, PRU; 5066(1) PRE, PRU;
5976(1) PRE, PRU; 6437(1) PRE, PRU. Van Jaarsveld 12(4)
NBG; 675(4) NBG, PRE; 5500(1) NBG. Van Son sub TRV
30688(1) PRE. Van Vuuren 55(1) PRE. Van Wyk 915(1) PRE,
PUC. Venter F. 697(1) PRE. Venter H.J.T. 7(2) ZULU; 300
(2) BLFU; 570(9) NH; 654(9) NH; 729(9) ZULU; 552(7)
ZULU; 2275(2) ZULU; 2259(7) BLFU; 2424(1) PRE, ZULU;
5505(9) ZULU; 3304(1) ZULU; 5455(1) ZULU; 4547(9)
BLFU; 4993(4) PRE, ZULU; 4996(7) ZULU; 5255(8) BLFU;
5291 ( 8) PRE, ZULU; 5489(4) PRE, ZULU. Verdoom PRE
58467(1) PRE. Vogt PRE 55600(1) PRE. Vorster L.L. 15(1)
PRU. Vorster P. 2623 ( 8) PRE.
Wager H.A. sub TRV 22462(6) PRE; sub TRV 22988(1) PRE;
sub TRV 24101(2) PRE; PRE 55633(1) PRE. Wager V. C45(l)
PRE. Ward 222(9) NU; 584(2) NU, PRE; 755(7) NU, PRE;
1874(9) NH, NU; 1875(9) NH, PRE; 2755(1) NU; 2406(6)
NH, PRE; 4361(9) NH, PRE; 5381(1) NH, PRE; 5389(9) NH,
NU, PRE; 5495(1) NU; 5560(4) NH, NU; 6265(2) NU; 6575
(9) NH, NU, PRE; 6509(9) NH, NU; 7601(1) NU; 7696(9)
NH, NU. Watmough 486(2) PRE. Weeks 82(9) J. Wells 1429
(2) NU; 2550(1) GRA, NH, PRE; 5575(2) GRA, PRE; 4263
(2) NH; 4266(2) PRE. West 1089(1) PRE. Williams 8(1) NU.
Williams Miss sub TRV 7622(1) PRE. Wilson 55(9) NU. Wylie
sub Wood 8990(4) NH; 70555(4) GRA, PRE, SAM, STE.
Young PRE 55596(1) PRE; PRE 55607(1) PRE.
Pseudarthria hookeri
Acocks 1217 PRE; 232136 PRE. Adlam SAM 15562 SAM.
Ahrens 13 NBG. Allsop 800 NU.
Barrett 532 PRE. Baylis 1145 PRE. Biggs 197 PRE. Bolus 8885
BOL; 10949 BOL, PRE. Bos 1300 PRE, STE. Botha 1335
PRE, PUC. Boulle 8 NU. Bourquin 127 NU. Breyer sub TRV
17844 PRE; sub TRV 18387 PRE; PRE 55685 PRE. Britten
4753 GRA, PRE. Brown & Shapiro 464 PRE. Buitendag 498
NBG, PRE. Burtt Davy 1451 PRE; 1546a PRE; 2925 PRE.
Cholmondely PRE 55672 PRE. Clarke 47 PRE, PRU. Codd
5918 PRE; 6015 PRE. Codd <£ Muller 329 PRE. Coetzer211
BLFU, PRU. Coleman 66 NH. Collins sub TRV 9892 PRE.
Comins 88 NH, NU; 1948 GRA, PRE. Compton 24876 NBG;
26606 NBG, PRE; 27393 NBG, PRE; 31263 NBG, PRE. Craw-
ford 434 PRE. Cross 86 NBG.
Davison 91 PRE. Devenish 629 PRE. Dimock Brown 356 PRE;
452 PRE. Dohse & Lindahl 104 NH, PRE. Dyer 3152 PRE.
Eliov sen J 27186 J. Edwards 6 NU. Elan-Puttick 255 PRE.
Flanagan 2534 PRE, SAM; 2571 PRE. Frith 141 J.
Galpin 776 GRA, NH, SAM; 775 PRE; 75727 PRE; 14386
PRE; BOL 32274 BOL; BOL 322 75 BOL. Gerstner 6216 BOL.
Gordon-Gray 1372 NU. Grobbelaar 448 PRE, PRU; 2310 PRU.
Harding sub TRV 5181 PRE. Harrison 450 NH, PRE. Haygarth
STE 214 STE. Hemm s.n. VENDA, J. PRE. Hilliard 1325 NH, NU.
Hitchins 737 NH, PRE. Holt 42 PRE; 42 NH; 792 NH, PRE;
207 NH. Huntley 209 NH, NU, PRE. Hutton 50 GRA.
Indian collector NH 1 7731 NH; sub TR V 34012 PRE.
Jacobsen 2255 PRE. Jenkins sub TRV 7077 PRE; PRE 55702
PRE; PRE 55703 PRE. Johnson 368 NBG. Junod 2369 PRE;
4381 PRE.
KUlick 74 PRE. Kluge 410 PRE, PRU; 7755 PRE.
Lawn 305 NH. Leach 12109 PRE. Letty 441 PRE. Liebenberg
2379 PRE. Louw 2134 PUC, STE. Lovell PRE 55698 PRE.
Macgregor 55 NU. Maguire 689 J. McCallum PRE 55668 PRE.
McClean 129 PRE; 747PRE. Medley Wood 802 SAM, BOL, PRE;
1036 BOL, SAM ; NH 1491 NH; 7402 PRE; 9992 NH. Meeuse
9884 PRE. Moll 7527 NH, NU, PRE; 2744 NH, NU, PRE; 5265
NH, PRE. Morgan 6 7 PRE. Morris 786 NH, NU, PRE. Moss 18448
J . Mudd PRE 556 78 PRE. Muller 2475 PRE. Murray 690 PRE.
Nicholson 236 NH.
Obermeyer 319 PRE; 454 PRE.
Pegler 697 BOL, PRE. Pierce 6 PRE. Pole-Evans H. 1 7030 PRE.
Pooley & Joubert 2013 E, K, NU, MO.
Rehmann 6281 BOL. Repton 3482 PRE. Robbertse 102 PRU.
Rogers STE 13602 STE; 24054 PRE. Ross 85 NU; 277 NU;
777 BLFU; 750 NU. Rudatis 392 STE. Rump NH 10403 NH.
Scheepers 106 PRE, PRU; 520 PRE, PRU. Schlechter4551 BOL,
GRA; sub TRV 2220 PRE; sub TRV 13151 PRE. Schlieben
9478 PRE; 70755 PRE. Schrire 295 NH; 597 NH; 400 NH;
454 NH; 665 NH; 557 NH; 559 NH; 572 NH. Smith PRE
55688 PRE. Smuts 255 PRE; 507 PRE. Stephan 298 PRE;
557 PRE. Stirton 1751b PRE. Strey 3322 PRE; 4656 NH,
PRE; 9721 NH, PRE.
Theron 2351 PUC. Thode STE 3456 STE; STE 6367 STE.
Thomcroft 402 PRE; sub TRV 2849 PRE. Tyson 1440 PRE,
SAM, STE; 2046 SAM.
Venter 744 ZULU; 570 BLFU; 2500 ZULU; 5272 PRU,
ZULU. Verdoom 2442 PRE. Vahrmeijer 2403 PRE. Van Dam
PRE 55684 PRE. Van derMerwe 106 PRE. Van der Schijff 722
PRE; 4577 PRE, PRU. Van Elden 1 PRE. Van Rooyen 6 NU.
Van Son sub TRV 30436 PRE. Van WykA.E. 2568 PRU; 4044
PRE.
Wade NU 52896 NU. Wager C.30 PRE. Ward 2069 NU, PRE;
2510 NH, PRE; 7591 PRE. Watson 3 PRE. Wells 1111 NU,
PRE; 4270 NH; NU 34142 NU. Werdermann & Oberdieck
2776 PRE. Williamson 269 PRE. Wilson 20 NU. Wood 156 NU.
Alysicarpus
Acocks 9872(3) NH, PRE; 13160(2) PRE.
Barker 2742(3) BOL, NBG; 4252(3) NBG. Barrett 348(4) PRE.
Baur 572(3) SAM. Bolus 11074(2) BOL; 11829(2) BOL, PRE.
Bourquin 103(3) NU; 577(1) NU; 650(1) PRE. Bredenkamp
1737(4) PRE; 1739(4) PRE; 1847(4) PRE; 7565(1) PRE.
Bredenkamp <6 Van Vuuren 139(2) PRE; 295(3) PRE. Breyer
sub TRV 17056(1) PRE; sub TRV 17857(1) PRE; sub TRV
20903(3) PRE; PRE 55731(2) PRE; PRE 55733(2) PRE.
Buitendag 502(1) NBG, PRE. Burke PRE 9323(2) PRE. Burtt
Davy 804(2) PRE; 577(3) PRE. Buthelezi 774(3) NH; 142(3)
NH; 150(2) NH; 765(3) NH; 275(3) NH; 252(3) NH.
Clarke 131(2) PRU; 262(1) PRE, PRU; 265(3) PRE, PRU; 470
(3) PRE, PRU; 525(1) PRU. Codd & De Winter 4884(1) PRE;
4964(1) PRE. Coetzee B.J. 6065(4) PRE. Coetzee NH 35014
(3) NH. Coetzer 103(2) PRE; 755(1)PRE. Compton 28332(3)
PRE; 25545(1) NBG, PRE. Comins 436(3) NU; 7779(3)GRA,
PRE. Culverwell 1183(2) PRE; 1196(3) PRE; 7525(1) PRE.
Cuthbert NU 52685(3) NU.
24
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
Devenish 929(3) PRE. De Winter 7692(3 ) PRE. Dinter 7628(3)
BOL, PRE, WIND. Dixon 21(3) NU. Du Plessis 1136(2) PRE,
PRU.
Elan-Puttick 246(2) PRE. Ellis 2616b(3) PRE.
Fisher 743(3) NH, NU. Flanagan 416(3) GRA, PRE, SAM;
2802(3) NH, PRE. Forbes 738(3) NH. Frankish 66(3) NU.
Galpin 1158(2) GRA, NH, PRE, SAM; 3408(3) BOL, PRE;
5779(3) PRE; 9729(3) PRE; 12975(3) BOL, PRE. Germishui-
zen 388(2) PRE; 557(2) PRE; 654(2) PRE. Gerstner 4209(3)
NH; 6844(4) PRE; NH 33781(2) NH. Gertenbach 7021(4)
PRE. Giffen 1070(3) PRE; 2096(3) PRE. Gordon-Gray 1128
(3) NU. Gordon Truscott 7a( 3) PRE. Grobbelaar 2(3) PRE,
PRU; 5(3) PRU; 323(3) PRE, PRU; 2520(3) PRU.
Hall & Sons PRE 55715(1) PRE. Hanekom 1913(3) PRE. Hil-
liard 1259(3) NU; 1848(3) NU; 1943(3) NU. Hitchins 566(3)
PRE. Huntley 1502(2) PRE. Hutton 1031(3) GRA, NBG.
Jacobsen 1588(3) PRE. Jacobsz 768(3) PRE; 505(3) PRE.
King 57(3) PRE; 64(3) PRE.
Lawn 1120(3) NH; 1908(3) NH. Leeman 23(3) PRE. Leendertz
399(2) BOL, J, PRE; 407(3) PRE, SAM; sub TRV 5985(2)
PRE; sub TR V 8754(2) PRE; sub TRV 11298(2) PRE. Lennox
NU 28057(3) NU. Liebenberg 2788(2) PRE; 5295(1) PRE;
5295(3) PRE; 5505(3) NH; 5572(2)NH; 5452(2) PRE; 8721
(3) PRE.
Mauve 5298(3) NH. Medley Wood 274(3) NH; 6091(3) BOL.
Merxmuller & Giess 1862(3) WIND; 30098(3) WIND. Mogg
5960(3) NH, PRE; 6143(3) PRE; 6605(3) PRE; 15064(3)
PRE. Moll 1057(3) NU, PRE; 1505(3) NH, NU, PRE; 7656(3)
NU, PRE; 2595(3) NU, PRE. Moss 383(3) J ; 8490(2) J ; 75274
(2) J. Moss <£ Rogers 51 7(1) J ; 602(1) J; 995(3) J.
Obermeyer 148(3) PRE; 7244(3)PRE. Obermeyer & VanNou-
huys sub TR V 27805(3) PRE.
Pegler 163(3) PRE; 7459(3) PRE. Pelletier J 30510(3) 1. Penny
Col. Herb. 2388(3) PRE. Pooley 726(4) E, K, NH, NU. Pott
5075(3) PRE; sub TRV 15081(3) PRE; 5545(2) PRE. Preller
139(3) PRE. Puree PRE 55727(1) PRE.
Ranger 302(3) PRE. Rattray 616(3) GRA. Reachmoor PRE
11854(1) PRE. Rehmann 461(3) BOL. Repton 87(3) PRE;
555(3) PRE; 2767(2) PRE; 2755(3) PRE. Rogers 301(3) GRA;
sub TRV 5165(3) PRE; 10931(3) PRE; 14394(3) J, PRE;
18294(3) J; 21921(2) PRE; 24860(3) PRE; 25092(1) J.
Rudatis 131(2) STE; 7565(3) STE; 1729(3) PRE. Rump NH
20290(3) NH; NH 20328(3) NH.
Scheepers 176(3) PRE, PRU. Schlechter 3121(3) PRE; 5227(3)
BOL, PRE. Schrire 269(3) NH; 270(3) NH; 277(3) NH; 405(3)
NH; 667(3) NH; 574(3) NH; 909(4) NH; 7720(2)NH; 1320
(3) NH. Shirley 304(3) NU; NU 32878(3) NU. Sim 19436(3)
PRE; 20175(3) PRE, NU. Smith 1451(3) PRE; 2445(4) PRE.
Smuts & Gillett 2214(3) PRE. Steyn 995(2) NBG. Stirton 5076
(3) PRE; 5190(3) PRE; 5757(3) PRE; 10516(3) NH. Strey
4505(3) NH; 9775(2) NH, PRE.
Taylor 55(4) NH. Theiler PRE 55709(3) PRE. Thode STE 6662
(3) STE. Tinley 751(3) NU. Tyson 23(3) GRA, NH, PRE; 7447
(3) SAM, STE; 1196(3) PRE, SAM; 2002(3) BOL, NBG, PRE.
Vahrmeijer & Tolken 905(1) NH, PRE. Van Dam 21137(4) PRE.
Van der Schijff 437(1) PRE; 7596(1) PRE; 5290(3) PRE, PRU;
5291(2) PRE, PRU; 5297(3) PRE. Van Rensburg 2(3) NU.
Van Vuuren 531(2) NH. Van Wyk 4712(1) PRE. Venter 774(1)
ZULU; 7699(3) NH, PRE; 1969(3) ZULU; 3436(3) ZULU;
5765(4) ZULU; 4595(1) BLFU, PRE. Verdoom 135(3) PRE.
Wahl sub TRV 15525(3) PRE; PRE 55723(3) PRE. Ward 1512
(3) NH, PRE; 1796(1) NH, NU, PRE; 1891(3) NH, NU; 2426
(1) NH, NU, PRE; 5505(1) PRE. Wilms 5873(3) PRE. Wylie
NH 28026(3) NH.
Young A331(3) PRE.
Zey her SAM 32864(2) SAM.
SAGP/SAAB 1/113(3) PRE, PRU.
Lespedeza cuneata
Edwards 12 NH.
Hilliard 3888 NH, PRE.
Schrire 1368 NH.
Tainton s.n. NU.
Bothalia 18,1:25-29(1988)
The naturalized species of Lupinus (Fabaceae) in southern Africa
C. H. STIRTON*
Keywords: Fabaceae, Lupinus, naturalization, southern Africa
ABSTRACT
Four species of Lupinus have become naturalized in southern Africa: L. consentinii Guss., L. angustifolius L., L.
pilosus Murray and L. luteus L. Their morphological variation and geographical distribution is discussed and a key is
provided.
UITTREKSEL
Vier Lupinus-spesies het in suidelike Afrika genaturaliseerd geraak: L. consentinii Guss., L. angustifolius L., L.
pilosus Murray en L. luteus L. Hulle morfologiese variasie en geografiese verspreiding word bespreek en ’n sleutel word
voorsien.
INTRODUCTION
The genus Lupinus comprises some 200 species of
annual and perennial herbs, or sometimes subshrubs
(Polhill 1976; Bisby 1981). It is best represented in the
western parts of North and South America, with a second
centre in Mediterranean Europe with some extensions
into the highlands of eastern Africa (Kay 1979). Twelve
species of European and African origin are recorded
from Africa (Gladstones 1974; Plitmann 1981; Williams,
Demissie & Harbome 1983).
Lupins have been used by man for thousands of years,
principally for fodder, green manure, ornament and as
grain legumes. A few species have become naturalized
weeds in Mediterranean Europe, the south-east United
States of America, the Andes, Australia, New Zealand
and South Africa (Kay 1979).
The taxonomy of the genus has been confused for a
long time. This was exacerbated to some extent by the
development and growing importance of large-seeded
lupins as a source of edible protein (Gladstones 1974).
The most important grain legumes are Lupinus albus L.,
L. angustifolius L., L. luteus L. and L. mutabilis Sweet.
Recent studies on the flavonoid chemistry of the Old
World species of Lupinus provide useful taxonomic
markers (Williams et al. 1983) to separate the species
cultivated or naturalized in southern Africa. L. albus has
flavonols only, L. angustifolius and L. luteus have fla-
vones and flavonols, whereas L. consentinii and L. pilo-
sus are characterized by the presence of flavone C-glyco-
sides, luteolin and novel 2'hydroxyflavone. L. angusti-
folius is chemically distinct from all the other Old World
species as it accumulates diosmetin derivatives as major
leaf constituents (Williams et al. 1983). It is chemically
the most variable species and is divided into a number of
varieties (Plitmann 1966).
* B. A. Krukoff Botanist, The Herbarium, Royal Botanic Gardens,
Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, UK. Current address: CSIR Unit
for Plant Growth and Development, Department of Botany, University
of Natal, P.O. Box 375, Pietermaritzburg 3200.
MS. received: 1986.09.05.
The commercial exploitation of lupins in South Africa
began early this century but it was C.C.P. Wagener who
first drew attention to the importance of the crop (Van
Vuuren 1962). He used bitter lupins as fodder for sheep.
Prior to that the crop had been used as a green-manuring
crop in vineyards and orchards. By 1947 lupins had be-
come part of crop rotations in the wheatbelt of the Cape
(Preller 1949; Henning 1949). The introduction of sweet
lupins at about that time did much to increase wheat
yields and resulted in a substantial increase in the
number of livestock animals that could be maintained in
the region.
Fourteen cultivars were available in 1962 (Van Vuuren
1962): 1, L. albus: albus (German origin), carstens,
pflugs gela, pflugs ultra, and S.S.K. (white sweet); 2, L.
angustifolius: borre, jackalsfontein, ligvoet, S. E. blue
No. 1 , B. resistant, blue sweet (German origin) and 7002
(white); 3, L. luteus: S. E. yellow No. 1 and weiko III.
The weiko III cultivar is an alkaloid-free, white-seeded
and early maturing strain and is the dominant lupin culti-
vated in a number of European countries. A similar
strain named Stellenbosch-Elsenburg Geel-1 is popular
in South Africa. Lupins are still popular in the western
Cape and have begun to be used in other parts of South
Africa, for example, in the south-eastern Transvaal
Highveld (VanZyl 1973).
It was perhaps inevitable that as lupins became
increasingly popular some species would become natura-
lized. This study, based on herbarium material as well as
fresh specimens collected during three field trips to the
region in 1975, 1976 and 1984, is a first attempt to
monitor the spread of naturalized lupins in the Cape. It
should be stressed, however, that the distribution maps
(Figures 1—4) are only an indication of the extent of
naturalization. Botanists, farmers and extension-officers
are urged to collect herbarium material from areas which
are not recorded in this survey. The author will provide
identifications of any well pressed, vouchered material
that is sent to him.
The descriptions and keys are based on fresh material
and cover naturalized species only.
26
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
FIGURE 1. — Naturalized distribution of L. angustifolius in South
Africa.
FIGURE 2. — Naturalized distribution of L. consentinii in South Af-
rica.
FIGURE 3. — Naturalized distribution of L. pilosus in South Africa.
KEY TO SPECIES
la Flowers blue, rarely white:
2a Leaflets 8—11, 40-80 X 11-21 mm, flattened out, oblanceolate, upper surface finely sericeous; stipules
10— 1 1 mm long; flowers 18— 19 mm long, keel obtuse to acute; bracteoles extending past the sculpturing
pattern on the wing petals I . consentinii
2b Leaflets 7-9, 25-27 x 4, 5-5,0 mm, folded, linear-spathulate, upper surface glabrous; stipules 7-8 mm
long; flowers 15 mm long, keel rostrate; bracteoles shorter than the sculpturing pattern on the wing petals
2. angustifolius
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
27
1 b Flowers pink or yellow:
3a Flowers pink; plants densely hirsute, hairs up to 4,5 mm long; leaflets 14—20 mm wide, obovate; bracteoles
pinkish; tip of keel brown; seeds rough 3. pilosus
3b Flowers yellow; plants sparsely hirsute; leaflets 5-12 mm wide, narrowly obovate; bracteoles black; tip of
keel black; seeds smooth 4. luteus
KEY TO DISTINCTIVE FEATURES
A. Apex of petiole, where the leaflets emerge, distinctly
domed consentinii
Apex of petiole, where the leaflets emerge, flattened
angustifolius, luleus, pilosus
B. Stipules recurved angustifolius, luleus
Stipules straight consentinii, pilosus
C. Stipules shaggy pilosus
Stipules pubescent angustifolius, consentinii, luteus
D. Upper surface of leaflets glabrous angustifolius
Upper surface of leaflets pubescent consentinii, luteus, pilosus
E. Flowers blue angustifolius, consentinii
Flowers pink pilosus
Flowers yellow luteus
Flowers white angustifolius
1. Lupinus consentinii Guss ., Florae siculae pro-
dromus 2: 398 ( 1 828). For a detailed synonym listing see
Gladstones: 29 (1972) and Gladstones: 21 (1974).
Robust annual up to 1 m tall, erect with vigorous
lateral branching, covered in shortly villous 1 mm long
patent hairs. Stipules 10—11 mm long, linear-subulate,
straight, arching back towards branch, pubescent. Leaf-
lets 8— 11, 40— 80 x 14—21 mm, oblanceolate, midrib
prominent, apex blunt with a point, base cuneate, finely
sericeous above and below; petiole 85—135 mm long,
terete for most of its length but flattened adaxially to-
wards the base. Inflorescences axillary, verticillate, low-
est verticil quintuplicate sometimes subaltemate,
25— (40)-flowered, 60—180 mm long. Flowers 18—19
mm long, on stout 5 mm long pedicels; bract 6-7 mm
long, lanceolate, early caducous; bracteoles linear. Ca-
lyx 10—12 mm long; upper lobes deeply divided; lower
lobes much longer, fused but shallowly 3-toothed, vil-
lous. Corolla 15-16 x 14-18 mm, dull' violet-blue
darkening with age, nectar patch white turning lilac after
anthesis; scentless. Standard 17—18 mm long and wide,
very broadly ovate, scarcely clawed or auriculate, apex
rounded. Wing petals 15 mm long, barely longer than
keel petals, dull violet-blue; fused at apex; claw 2 mm
long; sculpturing on upper basal parts comprising 10
rows of 14-20 intercostal lunae. Keel petals 14 mm
long; fused halfway along the base to the acute apex, tip
pigmented. Androecium 15 mm long; anthers dimorphic,
comprising 5 basifixed, linear anthers 1 ,2 mm long, and
5 medifixed, reniform anthers 0,5 mm long. Pistil 13
mm long; ovary 8 mm long, densely shaggy, height of
curvature 5 mm. Fruits 40—50 x 13—15 mm, densely
villous, apple-green, rostrate, segmented. Seeds 4,
rough. Figure 5B.
Lupinus consentinii is most commonly confused with
L. angustifolius but it is easily separated trom that spe-
cies by its much longer, wider, open, oblanceolate leaf-
lets and obtuse to acute keel petals. Flowering takes
place in August and September.
2. L. angustifolius L., Species plantarum: 721
(1753); Gladstones: 28 (1972). Holotype: Linnaean Col-
lection 898.7 (LINN).
Erect annual up to 150 mm high, compact, with pro-
fuse lateral branching; finely appressed puberulent. Stip-
ules 7-8 mm long, linear-subulate, recurved, pubes-
cent, glabrous above. Leaflets 7—9, 25-27 x 4,5— 5,0
mm, conduplicate, linear to linear-spathulate, upper sur-
face glabrous, lower surface sparsely sericeous; petiole
35—45 mm long, adaxial surface flattened, somewhat
canaliculate. Inflorescences axillary, on short shoots,
with flowers generally alternate towards base but subver-
ticillate towards apex, 5 — 30-flowered, 50—170 mm
long, subsessile but elongating in fruit. Flowers 12—15
mm long, on 2—4 mm long pedicels; bract 7 mm long,
oblanceolate to ovate, caducous; bracteoles 2-3 mm
long, oblong. Calyx 9- 10 mm long; upper lobes deeply
divided; lower lobes united into a longer lip, entire or
irregularly 3-toothed, bluish, appressed pubescent. Co-
rolla 12-15 mm long, 9 mm wide, lavender to bluish,
rarely pure white, upper margin of wing petals turns pink
after anthesis. Standard 12—13 x 9-10 mm, elliptic,
shortly clawed, auricles absent, apex truncate. Wing pe-
tals 12 mm long, 5 mm wide, longer than keel petals,
lavender, fused at apex; claw 2 mm long; sculpturing on
upper basal parts comprising 5 rows, each with 20—25
intercostal lunae. Keel petals 1 1 mm long, 3,5 mm wide,
rostrate, sharply upcurved, tip deep purple. Androecium
12 mm long; anthers dimorphic, comprising 5 basifixed,
elongated, 0,9 mm long anthers and 5 short, medifixed,
0,3 mm long anthers; pollen orange. Pistil 12 mm long;
ovary 4 mm long, densely shaggy, height of curvature 3
mm. Fruit 40—50 x 7—8 mm, villous, pale apple-
green. Seeds 5—7, smooth. Figure 5A.
The differences between this species and the only
other blue-flowered species, L. consentinii , are given
under the former. White-flowered morphs are known to
occur in L. angustifolius. It is distinguished from the
other three species by the glabrousness of the upper sur-
face of the leaflets.
Flowering occurs between August and October. This
is the most weedy of the naturalized lupins in South
Africa. It can eventually form large stands where it has
become established.
3. L. pilosus Murray in L., Systema vegetabilium,
edn 13: 545 (1774). The complicated synonymy and
typification of this species is outlined in Gladstones
(1974).
Erect, 350—700 mm tall, sparsely branched annual.
Stems, petioles and peduncles all clothed in 4,5 mm
long, soft white hairs. Stipules 10-14 mm long, linear-
subulate, straight, more or less parallel to the subtending
branch, shaggy. Leaflets 9, 40— 60 x 14—20 mm, obo-
vate, finely appressed villous on both sides, partly con-
duplicate; petioles 50-60 mm long, adaxially flattened
28
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
angustifolius
FIGURE 5. — Naturalized species of Lupinus in South Africa: A, L. angustifolius', B, L. consentinii; C, L. luteus, D, L. pilosus. 1, flower, X
2; 2, bracteole, x 4; 3, standard, X 2; 4, wing petal showing lunate sculpturing, X 2; 5, keel petal, X 2; 6, junction of the petiole with the
stem, showing shape and orientation of the stipule, x 2; 7, upper surface of middle leaflet, x 2; 8, basic shape of leaf; 9, fruit, x 1.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
towards the base. Inflorescences axillary, lax, 12—16
mm long; peduncle stout; 20 -30- flowered, subverticil-
late proximally, verticillate distally. Flowers large, 20
mm long, 25 mm high; pedicels 6-7 mm long; bract
10—13 x 5 mm, boat-shaped, caducous; bracteoles 5
mm long, lanceolate. Calyx 13 mm long; upper lobes
deeply cleft, widely spaced; lower lobes united, entire,
longer than upper ones; tinged with pink. Corolla pink.
Standard 22-24 mm long and wide, ovate, pink with
large white nectar guide, turning rose after anthesis,
grooved on inner face; claw 4-5 mm long, broad. Wing
petals 18-19x9-10 mm, pale pink but whiter towards
the claw; claw 4 mm long, twisted. Keel petals 16x5
mm, rostrate; apex brown-tipped. Androecium 18 mm
long; anthers dimorphic, comprising 5 basifixed, elon-
gated anthers 2 mm long, alternating with 5 shorter, 1
mm long, medifixed anthers; pollen orange. Pistil 14
mm long; ovary 10 mm long, shaggy; stigma penicillate,
forward sloping; height of curvature 6 mm. Fruits
50—80 x 20—25 mm, hirsute, yellow-green. Seeds
3-4. Figure 5D.
Lupinus pilosus is distinguished by its shaggy stipules,
densely hairy fruits and pink flowers. Flowering occurs
from late July to October.
4. L. luteus L., Species plantarum: 721 (1753);
Gladstones: 28 (1972) for full synonymy. Holotype: Lin-
naean Collection 898.8 (LINN).
Herbaceous annual up to 700 mm tall; rosetted in-
itially but later becoming erect with vigorous basal
branching; lightly hirsute. Stipules of stem leaves 12-20
x 2—5 mm, smaller on rosette leaves, subulate, re-
curved, pubescent but glabrous on lower half of inner
face. Leaflets 7-9(10), 33-55 x 5-12 mm, narrowly
obovate, mucronate, villous above and below, partly
conduplicate; petioles 70-90 mm long, adaxially flat-
tish, shallowly channelled. Inflorescences axillary,
13— 17 mm long, elongating in fruit, verticillate,
25— 45-flowered; peduncle 5-7 mm long. Flowers
14— 15 mm long, yellow; pedicels 2—3 mm long, weak;
bract 4 mm long, obovate, scoop-like, early caducous,
black; bracteoles 4-5 mm long, linear, black. Calyx
7-8 mm long; lobes equal, pubescent; upper lobes
deeply divided; lower lobes united, shallowly 3-toothed,
tips of lobes tinged with black. Corolla chrome-yellow,
sweetly scented. Standard 15—17 x 10—11 mm, nar-
rowly ovate; claw 3 mm long; apex emarginate, front of
standard channelled; auricles weakly developed. Wing
petals 15-16 x 3-4 mm; claw 3-4 mm long; tips
fused; sculpturing in upper basal parts with 6—7 rows of
15— 20 intercostal lunae. Keel petals 13-14 x 3-4
mm, rostrate, sharply upcurved, tip black. Androecium
14 mm long; anthers dimorphic, comprising 5 basifixed,
elongated, 1,5 mm long anthers alternating with 5 medi-
fixed, ovate, 0,3 mm long anthers; pollen yellow. Pistil
12 mm long; ovary 6 mm long, densely appressed
shaggy; height of curvature 6 mm. Fruits 45-50 x
11 — 13 mm, reticulate, densely villous, olive-green.
Seeds 2-4, smooth. Figure 5C.
29
Lupinus luteus is distinguished by its bright yellow
flowers and distinctly reticulate, densely villous fruits.
Flowering occurs in August and September.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank Miss D. Snijman and Miss P.
Perry (Kirstenbosch) for their generous help during this
study. The guest house facilities at the National Botanic
Gardens, Kirstenbosch have been host to many botanists;
their utility to visiting scientists cannot be overestimated.
I thank the Curators and staff of BM, BOL, GRA, K,
MO, NH, NU, PRE and STE for their help in locating
material and its loan where available. Miss Angela Beau-
mont kindly drew the composite plate, published with
permission of R. B. G. Kew. Finally, I wish to acknowl-
edge the support of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew,
and the Missouri Botanical Garden in sustaining my Re-
search Fellowship.
REFERENCES
BISBY, F.A. 1981. Genisteae (Adans.) Benth. In R. M. Polhill &
P. H. Raven, Advances in legume systematics: 409—425. Royal
Botanic Gardens, Kew.
GLADSTONES, J. S. 1972. Lupins in Western Australia. Department
of Agriculture, Western Australia, Bulletin No. 3834.
GLADSTONES, J. S. 1974. Lupins of the Mediterranean region and
Africa. Technical Bulletin No. 26, Western Australian Depart-
ment of Agriculture.
GUSSONE, G. 1828. Florae siculae prodromus 2: 398. Naples.
HENNING, P. O. 1949. Lupines in the winter rainfall area. Farming
in South Africa 24: 227-236.
KAY, D.E. 1979. Food legumes. Tropical Products Institute, London.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum: 721. Stockholm.
LINNAEUS, C. 1774. Systema vegetabilium, edn 13: 545. Gottingen.
PLITMANN, U. 1966. Studies in the taxonomy of the Leguminosae of
Israel. Israel Journal of Botany 15: 25-30.
PLITMANN, U. 1981. Evolutionary history of the Old World Lu-
pines. Taxon 30: 430-437.
POLHILL, R. M. 1976. Genisteae (Adans.) Benth. and related tribes
(Leguminosae). Botanical Systematics I: 143—368.
PRELLER, J. H. 1949. Lupines. Farming in South Africa 24: 25-29.
VAN VUUREN, P. J. 1962. How to identify lupins. Farming in South
Africa 38,9: 61 - 64.
VAN ZYL, L. G. 1973. Lupins in the south-eastern Transvaal High-
veld. Farming in South Africa 48: 4-7, 10.
WILLIAMS, C. A., DEMISSIE, A. & HARBORNE, J. B. 1983.
Flavonoids as taxonomic markers in Old World Lupinus species.
Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 1 1 : 22 1 -23 1 .
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
Bos 28 (2) STE. Cloete s.n. (4) STE. Markotter s.n. (2) STE 19310.
Snijman 882 (2) K, NBG, PRE; 883 (4) K, NBG, PRE; 884 (2) K,
NBG, PRE; 886 (2) K, NBG, PRE; 903a (2) K, NBG, PRE; 908 (4) K,
NBG, PRE. Stirton 5021 ( 1) PRE; 5036 (4) K, PRE; 5037 (2) K, PRE;
5882 (2) K, PRE; 5940 (2) K, PRE; 6129 (2) K, PRE; 10751 ( 1 ) NBG;
10752 (3) NBG; 10753 (4) NBG; 10762 (2) NBG; 10765 (4) NBG.
Vahrmeijer 2321 (2) PRE. Cultivated specimens: Codd s.n. (3) K.
Henning s.n. ( 1) K.
Bothalia 18,1: 31-36(1988)
Studies in the genus Lotononis (Crotalarieae, Fabaceae). 1. Three new
species of the section A ulacinthus from the Cape Province
B-E. VAN WYK*
Keywords: Cape Province, Lotononis section Aulacinthus, Fabaceae, new taxa
ABSTRACT
Three new species of the section Aulacinthus (E. Mey.) Benth. of Lotononis (DC.) Eckl. & Zeyh. are described: L.
comptonii B-E. van Wyk, L. dahlgrenii B-E. van Wyk and L. dissitinodis B-E. van Wyk. These species are related to L.
gracilis (E. Mey.) Benth. and L. rigida (E. Mey.) Benth. and are all endemic to marginal fynbos areas of the south-western
Cape. The section now comprises seven species.
UnTREKSEL
Drie nuwe soorte van die seksie Aulacinthus (E. Mey.) Benth. van Lotononis (DC.) Eckl. & Zeyh. word beskryf: L.
comptonii B-E. van Wyk, L. dahlgrenii B-E. van Wyk en L. dissitinodis B-E. van Wyk. Hierdie soorte is verwant aan L.
gracilis (E. Mey.) Benth. en L. rigida (E. Mey.) Benth. en is almal endemies in marginale fynbosgebiede van die Suidwes-
Kaap. Die seksie behels nou sewe soorte.
INTRODUCTION
The section Aulacinthus (E. Mey.) Benth. of Lotono-
nis (DC.) Eckl. & Zeyh. comprises a small group of
poorly known fynbos shrubs. Species of this section are
remarkably similar in their leaves and habit to some
species of Lebeckia Thunb., Wiborgia Thunb. and Aspa-
lathus L.
When Bentham (1843) changed the status of Aulacin-
thus E. Mey. to a section of Lotononis, he remarked on
its similarity to other genera of the Crotalarieae but also
noted its distinguishing floral and fruit characters. The
upper calyx lobes are usually fused in pairs on either side
and the fruit is relatively short, laterally inflated and has
the lower suture sunken to various degrees. In terms of
fruit characters, the verrucose upper suture is perhaps the
most significant and useful diagnostic feature. The seeds
of all the species are distinctly tuberculate and not
smooth as in other genera of the Crotalarieae. Bentham
(1843) and Harvey (1862) listed for section Aulacinthus,
three species [L. gracilis (E. Mey.) Benth., L. rigida (E.
Mey.) Benth. and L. viborgioides Benth.] to which
Diimmer (1913) added one [L. leucoclada (Schltr.)
Diimmer, transferred from Lebeckia],
As part of a continuing taxonomic study of the genus
Lotononis, I investigated the section Aulacinthus and
found three undescribed species that clearly belong to
this group. These are described below.
The circumscription of Aulacinthus and its status as a
section need to be reconsidered. As a group it gradually
merges (through yet another group of undescribed spe-
cies) with the section Polylobium (Eckl. & Zeyh.)
Benth. This problem, however, falls beyond the scope of
the present paper.
* Department of Botany, Rand Afrikaans University, P.O. Box 524,
Johannesburg 2000.
MS. received: 1987.08.17.
Lotononis comptonii B-E. van Wyk, sp. nov. L.
gracili (E. Mey.) Benth. valde affinis, sed habitu laxiore
sparsiore, foliis ramunculisque sparse strigillosis (non
dense albo-pubescentibus), stipulo unico in quoque nodo
(in L. gracili stipulis omnino destitutis) et vexillo auran-
tiaco-rubro (in posteriore flavo) differt.
TYPE. — Cape, 3320 (Montagu): Laingsburg to
Seweweekspoort Road, 9,5 km after entrance to Rietvlei
Farm (-AD), 12.10.86, B-E. van Wyk 2160 (PRE,
holo.; BOL, C, JRAU, K, M, MO, NBG, SAAS, STE,
iso.).
Lax, sparsely branched woody shrub, up to 0,4 m tall.
Branches slightly corky, yellow-brown; young twigs
sparsely strigillose. Leaves digitately trifoliolate (very
rarely 4 or 5-foliolate); petiole (7—) 18-25 (-42) mm
long, persistent for some time after the leaflets have been
individually shed; leaflets obovate, narrowly oblong, or
narrowly elliptical, (4—) 8—15 ( — 21) mm long, (1— )
2—3 (-5) mm wide, abaxially sparsely strigillose,
adaxially glabrous. Stipules consistently present, single
at each node, elliptic-oblong to narrowly lanceolate,
(2 — ) 5 — 7 (—9) mm long. Inflorescences terminal,
rarely subterminal, long-pedunculate, 60-150 mm long,
sparsely (3-) 4—6 (—8) -flowered; bracts 2-3 (-5)
mm long; bracteoles absent. Flowers 10-12 mm long,
orange-red and yellow; pedicel 2-5 mm long. Calyx
6-8 mm long, with the lateral lobes on either side fused
much higher up in pairs, minutely strigillose. Standard
broadly ovate to orbicular, 8—12 mm long, longi-
tudinally striate, orange to bright orange-red. Wing
petals broadly oblong, slightly shorter than the keel;
apex obtuse; sculpturing upper basal and upper central,
in 4-5 rows of intercostal lunae. Keel petals broadly
elliptical, auriculate and pocketed near the base. Anthers
dimorphic. Pistil 10—12 mm long; ovary short, oblong-
ovate, 4-6 mm long. Fruit 12-15 mm long, 4-5 mm
wide, laterally much inflated, lower suture sunken,
upper suture verrucose, glabrous. Seed suborbicular in
side view, up to 2 mm long, distinctly tuberculate, red-
dish brown (Figure 1).
32
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
FIGURE I . -Lolononis comptonii. Al, A2, flowering branches; Bl , B2, leaves, showing the single stipule and vestiture; Cl , C2, calyx
opened out, with the upper lobes to the right (Cl) and to the left (C2), vestiture not shown; Dl, D2, standard petals; El, E2, wing
petals; FI , F2, keel petals; G1 , G2. pistils; HI , H2, fruit, in side and top view; SI. S2, seeds, showing the tuberculate surface; Tl,
T2, bracts. (A I, B2, Cl, C2, D2, E2, F2,G1 &TI from BVW2I60 ; A2 & T2 from BVW 2161 ; Dl, El, FI & G2 from BVW 2185;
B I , H 1 & H2 from Compton 12166; S 1 & S2 from BVW 2190). Scale in mm.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
33
This species is closely related to L. gracilis (E. Mey.)
Benth., but differs in the more lax and sparse habit, the
sparsely strigillose leaves and twigs (not densely white-
pubescent), the presence of a single stipule to each node
(stipules totally absent in L. gracilis) and in the orange-
red vexillum (yellow in L. gracilis ).
L. comptonii is known only from two small popula-
tions on the northern slopes of the Witteberg and the
Klein Swartberg (Figure 2), where it was found in dry
fynbos vegetation on shallow, rocky soil. The specific
epithet commemorates Prof. R. H. Compton ( 1 886 —
1979), director of Kirstenbosch Botanical Garden for 34
years. He was responsible for the only collection known
prior to my rediscovery of the species in 1986.
CAPE. — 3320 (Montagu): Bantamskop, Witteberg (-BC),
27.10.1941, Compton 12166 (NBG, PRE); Bantamskop, 3 km from
the top(-BC), 13. 10. 1986, B-E. van Wyk 2185 (JRAU, PRE, NBG),
2186 (BOL, JRAU, PRE, MO, NBG), 2187 (JRAU, PRE), 2188,
2189 (JRAU), 2190 (JRAU, PRE). 3321 (Ladismith): Laingsburg to
Seweweekspoort Road, 9,5 km from entrance of Rietvlei Farm
(-AD), 12.10.1986, B-E. van Wyk 2160 (PRE, holo.; BOL, C,
JRAU, K, M, MO, NBG, SAAS, STE, iso.), 2161 (BOL, JRAU, K,
MO, NBG, STE), 2162 (BOL, GRA, JRAU, KMG, NH, PRE), 2163
(JRAU, PRE).
FIGURE 2. — The known geographical distribution of Lotononis comp-
tonii, ■ ; L. dahlgrenii, #; and L. dissitinoclis , •.
Lotononis dahlgrenii B-E. van Wyk , sp. nov. L.
rigidae (E. Mey.) Benth. similis, sed habitu etiam rigi-
diore lignosioreque, ramis lateralibus brevibus rigidis
aliquantum spinescentibus, racemis longioribus latiore
dispersis unifloratis (2 vel 3-floratis in L. rigida), calyce
sparse puberulo (in L. rigida dense patente pubescens),
vexillo carinaque maioribus, ovario fructuque longiori-
bus, differt. Etiam L. dissitinodi mei similis, sed foliolis
valde brevioribus, minus conduplicatis, stipulis omnino
destitutis, lobis calycis lateralibus connatis et vexillo
valde minore differt.
TYPE. — Cape, 3321 (Ladismith): Ladismith Div.,
near top of Roodeberg Pass (-DA), 19.7.1954, Lewis
4709 (NBG, holo.).
Rigid woody shrub. Branches sparsely leafy; some of
the lateral branches short, stiff and pungent; young twigs
silky-sericeous. Leaves digitately trifoliolate, densely
silky-sericeous; petiole very short, 1-3 mm long; leaf-
lets small, narrowly oblanceolate to linear, 2-5 (-8)
mm long, slightly conduplicate. Stipules absent. Inflo-
rescences subterminal on short lateral branches, 1-
flowered, rarely 2-fiowered; peduncle long, (6-) 10-15
mm in length; bracts small, oblong, up to 1 mm long;
bracteoles absent. Flowers 12—13 mm long, yellow;
pedicel 2—4 mm long. Calyx 6—8 mm long, lobes long,
acuminate, with the lateral ones on either side fused
much higher up in pairs, sparsely puberulous. Standard
ovate and pointed, 10-12 mm long, with a line of hairs
dorsally along the middle. Wing petals shorter than the
keel, oblong; sculpturing upper basal and upper central,
in 7-8 rows of intercostal lunae. Keel petals semicircu-
lar, obtuse, auriculate and pocketed near base. Anthers
dimorphic. Pistil long; ovary linear, 7-12 mm long.
Fruit linear, 12-15 mm long, inflated laterally; lower
suture distinctly sunken, upper suture verrucose. Seed
(immature) densely tuberculate (Figure 3).
This species is similar to L. rigida (E. Mey.) Benth.
but differs in the habit which is even more rigid and
woody, the short stiff and somewhat thorny lateral
branches, the longer, more widely spaced and single-
flowered racemes (2 or 3-flowered in L. rigida), the
sparsely puberulous calyx (densely and patently pubes-
cent in L. rigida), the larger standard and keel and the
longer ovary and fruit. It is also similar to L. dissitinodis
B-E. van Wyk, but differs in the much shorter and less
conduplicate leaflets, the total absence of stipules, the
fused lateral calyx lobes and the much smaller standard.
L. dahlgrenii may easily be confused with species of
Wiborgia and Aspalathus when not in flower. It appears
to be a rare species and is only known from three speci-
mens collected on the Rooiberg near Ladismith. The
species is named after the late Prof. Rolf Dahlgren in
recognition of his valuable contributions to the literature
on Cape legumes.
CAPE. — 3321 (Ladismith): Roodeberg summit ( — CB), 24.3.1940,
Bond 263 (NBG); 3. 1940, Lewis 1211 (SAM); near top of Roodeberg
Pass (-DA), 19.7. 1954, Lewis 4709 (SAM).
Lotononis dissitinodis B-E. van Wyk, sp. nov.,
strictim L. rigidae (E. Mey.) Benth. et L. dahlgrenii mei
similis, sed intemodiis valde longioribus, foliolis
longioribus anguste linearibus conduplicatis, stipulis ad
pedunculorum insertionem semper praesentibus, inflo-
rescentibus foliis oppositis (non subterminalibus), caly-
cis lobis subaequalibus, vexillo maximo, carina minore
acutioreque, fructu minus turgido differt.
TYPE.— Cape, 3320 (Montagu): 14 miles [22,4 km]
SSE of Laingsburg (-BD), 25.7.1959, Acocks 20502
(PRE, holo.; BOL, M, NBG, iso.).
Woody, sparsely branched shrub, up to 0,4 m tall.
Branches with very long intemodes, young twigs
densely sericeous. Leaves widely spaced on the twigs,
digitately trifoliolate (very rarely 4 or 5-foliolate),
densely sericeous; petiole (2-) 5-8 (-10) mm long,
adaxially grooved; leaflets narrowly linear, (5-) 7-12
(-15) mm long, conduplicate, apices recurved at matu-
rity. Stipules rarely present, at the insertion of the pedun-
cles only, single or paired, linear, variable in length,
1-8 mm long. Inflorescences leaf-opposed. 1 -flowered
(rarely 2-flowered); peduncles variable in length, 5-20
mm long; bracts small, up to 1 mm long; bracteoles
absent. Flowers large, 15-20mm long, yellow; pedicel
34
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
FIGURE 3. — Lotononis dahlgrenii. A, flowering branch; Bl , B3, leaves in adaxial view; B2, B4, leaves in abaxial view; Cl , C2,
calyx opened out with upper lobes to the left, showing lusion of the lateral lobes; Dl, D2, D3, standard petals, showing
variation in shape; El, E2, wing petals; FI , F2, keel petals; G I , G2, pistils; H, Iruit; S, immature seed, showing tuberculate
surface; Tl, T2, T3, bracts. (A, B I , B2, Cl , Dl . E2, F2, G I & T3 from Lewis 4709', B3, B4, D2, FI , G2, FI & T2 from Bund
263, C 2, D3, El, S &TI from Lewis 1211). Scale in mm.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
F|CURE 4. Lotonoms dissttinodis A flowering branch, showing the long intemodes and leaf-opposed inflorescences' B1 B7 B3
. 5J’ a.dax,a v,ew’ leaflets opened out, showing paired stipules, B2, abaxial view, with leaflets opened out stipules
fb^! B2 ' fdftXmh V'eW- th0W'ng ‘he n0rma' conduPlicate shape of the leaflets and a single stipule; Cl , C2, calyx^pened out Ljer
lobes to the left show, ng the very shght fusion of the lateral lobes; D1 , D2, standard petals (note the size); E, wing
obovate shape, F, keel petal, showing the small size and pointed apex; V, androecium; G, pistil; H, fruit, showinrverrucose upper
SE r,o“r: surface; Tl ' T2' b"'s- IA" “«P' V * T.'fan W„r,s ,5
36
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
1—3 mm long. Calyx 8-12 mm long; lobes long, sub-
equal, minutely silky-puberulous. Standard large,
broadly ovate, longer than the keel, 12—18 mm long,
longitudinally striate. Wing petals obovate, longer than
the keel; sculpturing upper basal, in ± 4 rows of inter-
costal lunae and irregular transcostal lamellae. Keel
petals short, semicircular, 8-10 mm long, acute. An-
thers dimorphic. Pistil 9-10 mm long; ovary linear,
6—8 mm long. Fruit oblong-linear, 16—20 mm long, 5
mm wide, not much inflated; lower suture not or only
slightly sunken; upper suture verrucose. Seed (immature)
densely tuberculate (Figure 4).
Superficially the species is similar to L. rigida and L.
dahlgrenii, but it differs in the much longer intemodes,
the longer, narrowly linear, conduplicate leaflets, the
consistent presence of stipules at the insertion of the
peduncles, the leaf-opposed (not subterminal) inflores-
cences, the subequally lobed calyx, the very large stan-
dard, the smaller, more acute keel petals and the less
turgid fruit.
L. dissitinodis appears to be restricted to the Klein
Swartberg (Figure 2) and is only known from four col-
lections. The very long intemodes are a diagnostic
character useful in distinguishing it from other woody
species, hence the specific epithet. Although it is closely
related to other species of the section Aulacinthus, the
very large standard, obovate wing petals and relatively
small, pointed keel approaches the flower structure typi-
cal of the section Telina (E. Mey.) Benth. [L. prostrata
(L.) Benth. and its allies]. This similarity is of interest
since it may help to explain the origin of the Telina-type
flower and inflorescence.
CAPE. — 3320 (Montagu): Buffets Poort Berg, lower slopes (-BD),
5.7.1941, Levyns 7414 (BOL); Klein Swartberg, western end (-BD),
7.8.1957, Wurts 1520 (NBG, 2 sheets); 14 miles SSE of Laingsburg
(-BD), 25.7.1959, Acocks 20502 (BOL, M, PRE); Seweweekspoort,
N foothills of Klein Swartberg, Santo (-AD), 3.9.1982, Viviers &
Vlok 70 (STE).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I wish to thank Dr H. F. Glen (Botanical Research
Institute, Pretoria) for the Latin translations and the
Directors and staff of the cited herbaria for the loan of
specimens. The taxonomic study of Lotononis is a regis-
tered Ph. D. project at the University of Cape Town.
REFERENCES
BENTHAM, G. 1843. Enumeration of Leguminosae, indigenous to
southern Asia, and central and southern Africa. The London Jour-
nal of Botany 2: 504—613.
DUMMER, R. A. 1913. A synopsis of the species of Lotononis, Eckl.
& Zeyh. , and Pleiospora Harv. Transactions of the Royal Society
of South Africa 3, 2: 275—335.
HARVEY, W. H. 1862. Leguminosae. In W. H. Harvey & O. W.
Sonder, Flora capensis 2: 47—66. Hodges & Smith, Dublin.
Bothalia 18,1:37-42(1988)
Studies in the genus Riccia (Marchantiales) from southern Africa. 8.
R. campbelliana (subgenus Riccia ), newly recorded for the region
S. M. PEROLD* and O. H. VOLK**
Keywords: anatomy, ‘idioblasts’, Marchantiales, Riccia campbelliana, southern Africa, spores
ABSTRACT
R. campbelliana Howe (1899), a rare species originally known from California and later from Georgia, Arkansas
(Jacobs 1951; Wittlake 1954), Kansas and Nebraska (S. Jovet-Ast pers. comm.), as well as from Kazakhstan
(Ladyzhenskaja 1967), has now also been found at a few localities in southern Africa. It is characterized by the distinctive
yellow-brown or rusty colouration of the dorsal surface along the margins and over the proximal parts; enlarged cells,
'idioblasts', which differ in shape and contents from the adjacent cells, are generally found in all parts of the thallus.
UITTREKSEL
R. campbelliana Howe (1899), 'n seldsame spesie oorspronklik bekend van Kalifomie, en later van Georgia, Arkansas
(Jacobs 1951; Wittlake 1954), Kansas en Nebraska (S. Jovet-Ast pers. kom.), sowel as Kazakhstan (Ladyzhenskaja 1967),
kom ook by 'n paar lokaliteite in suidelike Afrika voor. Dit word gekenmerk deur die geel-bruin kleur van die dorsale
oppervlak langs die rande van die tallus en oor die proksimale gedeeltes; vergrote selle, 'idioblaste', wat verskil in vorm en
inhoud van die aangrensende selle, kom ook algemeen in alle dele van die tallus voor.
Riccia campbelliana Howe in Memoirs of Torrey
Botanical Club 7: 26 (1899); Frye & Clark: 20 (1937);
Hassel De Menendez: 267 (1962); Ladyzhenskaja: 316
(1967).
TYPE. — California, near Stanford University, on hills
above Mission Dolores, D. H. Campbell s.n. May 1,
1896 [NY, lecto. !, fide Grolle: 225 (1976)].
Thallus monoecious, perennial, in crowded gregarious
patches or incomplete rosettes or scattered; simple or
once to twice furcate, branches divergent or mostly pa-
rallel, oblong-linear, medium-sized, up to 8 mm long,
1 ,0— 1 ,5( — 2,0) mm broad, once to twice broader than
thick (Figure 1A), segments up to 3,5 mm long; apex
rounded and obtuse, emarginate, dorsal furrow deep, its
sides raised and convex, becoming flatter in older parts
(Figures IB 1-6; 2A, 2B); dorsally pale green, yellow or
rusty brown along margins and more proximally over
entire dorsal surface; margins acute, shortly winged,
slightly undulating, flanks sloping upward and outward,
bronze-brown; ventral surface rounded, green, occasio-
nally flecked with red and brown; when dry, margins
indexed, forming brown lips, flanks with brown scales.
Anatomy of thallus: dorsal epithelium unistratose,
hyaline, cells variously shaped, in younger parts and
towards centre subglobose, 30—45 x 35—50 /zm, late-
rally becoming somewhat flatter and up to 70 /zm wide
(Figures 1C, 2C), brown and collapsed at margins and in
older parts, underlying layer of cells soon losing their
chloroplasts (Figure ID); air pores triangular, ± 7 /zm
wide, often rectangular and larger, ± 12 /zm wide
(Figure IE); in section, assimilation tissue (chloren-
* Botanical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and Water
Supply , Private Bag X 1 0 1 , Pretoria 000 1 .
** Botanische Anstalten d. Univ. Wurzburg D8700, Germany B.R.D.
MS. received: 1987.04.13.
chyma) occupying about / the thickness of thallus and
consisting of vertical columns of 6—10 cells, 50 — 60 x
35-50 /zm (Figure 1C), frequently some cells, referred
to as ‘idioblasts’ (see p.39), differ from surrounding
ones in the larger size, in the somewhat distended cell
walls and in the contents (Figures ID, 2F), air canals
between assimilation cell columns up to 20 /zm wide;
storage tissue occupying about 'A the thickness of thal-
lus, cells rounded or angular, tightly packed, up to 55
/zm wide, containing chloroplasts and starch granules,
usually with some scattered ‘idioblasts’ (Figure 2E).
Rhizoids hyaline, some smooth, others tuberculate,
15-20 /zm wide, arising from ventral epidermis of thal-
lus and base of scales. Scales imbricate, fragile,
inconspicuous, not projecting above thallus margin (Fig-
ure 2D), up to 750 x 450 /zm; margin hyaline, rest of
scale with groups of brown and different shades of violet
cells, interspersed with single, or with groups of hyaline,
4-6-sided cells, walls straight or sometimes sigmoidal,
cells elongated to nearly isodiametric, up to 65 x 40
/zm, some ‘idioblasts’ may be present, marginal cells
smaller, ± 40 x 40 /zm (Figure IF). Antheridia with
short hyaline or white necks along dorsal groove. Arche-
gonia with purple necks, also along groove. Sporangia
infrequent, single or crowded, large, ± 500 /zm wide,
with about 200 spores each, in median part of thallus,
causing bulging of overlying tissue which turns brown.
Spores (85 — )90 — 1 10( — 1 20) /im in diameter, pale
straw-coloured to brown, semitransparent, triangular-
globular, polar, with wing up to 5 /zm wide (Figure 3B),
pores at angles ±7,5 /zm or more wide, margin ±
smooth, ornamentation on both faces vermicular to irre-
gularly and incompletely reticulate; distal face with
10—15 incomplete areolae across diameter, ± 5 /zm
wide (Figure 3C, F), ridges often sinuous and raised into
blunt papillae at the nodes (Figure 3D), in transmitted
light ridges often appear to have a midline; proximal face
with triradiate mark generally clearly defined (Figure
3E) and with the ridges somewhat lower than those on
38
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
FIGURE 1 . Riccia campbelliana . Structure of thallus, scales and chromosomes. A, fresh thalli; B1 6, transverse sections of thallus branch
at different distances from apex to older parts; C, transverse section through dorsal epithelium, chlorenchyma and storage tissue; D,
transverse section through collapsed dorsal cells and chlorenchyma, showing ‘idioblasts’ and air canals; E, epithelial cells and narrow air
pores from above, dotted lines indicate contact with chlorenchyma cells below; F, scale; G, chromosomes, the letters A-E identity the
chromosomes (see text): A-D, F, S. M. Perold 888 ; E, Van Rooy & Perold 634 ; G, Van Rooy & Perold 637 \ A-F, by Volk; G, by
Bomefeld. Scale bar on A, B = 2 mm C-F = 100 /am; G = 1 /am.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
39
FIGURE 2. — Riccia campbelliana .
Structure of thallus and cells.
A, dorsal surface view of thal-
lus; B, apex and groove; C,
dorsal cells; D, scales at mar-
gin; E, transverse section
through thallus branch, show-
ing ‘idioblasts’; F, dorsal epi-
thelial cells and ‘idioblasts’ in
chlorenchyma. A-F, S. M. Pe-
rold 888. A-D, SEM micro-
graphs by Perold; E & F, LM
micrographs by Volk. Scale bar
= 50 pm.
distal face (Figure 3A). Chromosome number n = 8
[Figure 1G: the letters A— E identify the chromosomes,
T. Bomefeld pers. comm.; Siler (1934)].
In adapting Tatuno’s (1941) method, which in prin-
ciple is also that used by Jovet-Ast (1969; 1986), this
species with n = 8 chromosomes, has the following
karyotype, according to Bornefeld (1984): A, BB, CC,
DD, E. Capital letters of the alphabet are assigned to the
different chromosome types, whereby the largest are
denoted by the letter A and the smallest by the letter E. It
presents the basic set of chromosomes in the genus Ric-
cia, from which all other sets can be derived (Bornefeld
1984).
The ‘idioblasts’ in R. campbelliana are variable in
size, colour and contents; in the assimilation tissue they
are up to 100 gm long x 45-60 gim wide, single or
arranged in groups and are free of chloroplasts (fluores-
cence assay by Volk); those occurring in the epithelium,
the storage tissue and in the scales are also larger than the
surrounding cells. In fresh or dry material, the ‘idio-
blasts’ can be brown, grey or hyaline, and appear to be
clear and homogeneous or granular. They are readily
stained with Heidenhain’s iron haematoxylin (Howe
1899) or with diluted aqueous solutions of Thiacine
stains which are rapidly absorbed and produce metachro-
matic effects. Bienfait & Waterkeyn (1976) reported that
metachromatic effects demonstrate the presence of acid
muco-polysaccharides when Toluidine blue is used as a
stain in histochemical assays. The ‘idioblasts’ in R.
campbelliana are stained blue with Toluidine blue,
whereas other cell walls are violet. It may therefore be
assumed that pectines (derivatives of uronic acid) in the
cell walls, are responsible. With iodine-potassium
iodide, the cells turn brownish. In his original descrip-
tion of R. campbelliana Howe (1899) and R. dictyospora
Howe ( 1901 ), both from North America, Howe regarded
these ‘idioblasts’ as ‘oil cells’. Ladyzhenskaja (1967)
confirmed the presence of ‘oil cells’ in these two species
and also reported their occurrence in the European spe-
cies, R. breidleri Steph. and R. oelandica Jensen. Exam-
ination of four specimens of R. breidleri from Austria
(B ! ; W !) and four from Switzerland (G!) failed however,
to show the presence of ‘idioblasts’, but instead demon-
strated numerous droplets of ‘fatty oil’ in the storage
tissue. ‘Idioblasts’ were not found in R. oelandica (G!)
either, and only rarely could globules of fatty oils be
demonstrated, which also occur in R. campbelliana, but
only after boiling, when they can be stained with Tinc-
ture of Alkanna, Sudan Ill-glycerine or with other stains
for fats. ‘Idioblasts’ similar to those in R. campbelliana.
40
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
FIGURE 3. — Riccia campbelliana.
Spores. A, proximal face; B,
viewed from side; C, D, F, dis-
tal face; E, centre of triradiate
mark. A-F, S. M. Perold 888.
A-E, SEM micrographs by
Perold; F, LM micrograph by
Volk. Scale bar = 50 gm;
diameter of spore on F, ± 100
gim.
were found in R. dictyospora (G!; PRE!) and in R.
macrocarpa Levier (B ! ; W!) — described in the latter
by Jovet-Ast (1986) as ‘cellules a contenu orange
eparses’, and in specimens of R. nigrella from many
parts of the world. In southern African Ricciae, the pre-
sence of ‘idioblasts’ is a unique feature and only known
in these two species, R. campbelliana and R. nigrella [/?.
capensis auct. non Steph.: S. Amell (1952)], see Perold
& Volk (1988).
According to Howe (1899) the epithelial cells of
R. campbelliana are usually longer than wide, but the
South African specimens have ± globose, to depressed
globose cells. He also reported the antheridial necks to
be 100-170 /u.m long, i.e. more prominent than in our
plants. The SEM micrographs of the spores published by
Steinkamp & Doyle (1979), bear a close resemblance to
those in the present study.
R. campbelliana is new to southern Africa. It is
known from only three localities in central Transvaal,
ranging from Derby, eastwards to Middelburg, and from
a single locality in the eastern Orange Free State, near
Fouriesburg (Figure 4). It grows in summer rainfall areas
with an annual precipitation of 600 - 800 mm and at
altitudes of I 500-1 800 m above sea level. It prefers
shallow, acid soils overlying granitic, quartzitic or
sandstone rock outcrops (pH ± 4,6), fully exposed to the
sun, and is often associated with other Riccia species,
such as R. nigrella DC. and R. okahandjana S. Amell,
with small moss species, e.g. Pleuridium nervosum
(Hook.) Mitt, and with crustaceous lichens.
FIGURE 4. — Map showing distribution of R. campbelliana in southern
Africa.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
41
Localities of R. campbelliana outside southern Africa
are the following: USA, California, where it was found
by Campbell, in whose honour Howe named it; Georgia
(Jacobs 1951), Arkansas (Jacobs 1951; Wittlake 1954),
Kansas and Nebraska (S. Jovet-Ast pers. comm); USSR,
Kazakhstan, Western Siberia (Ladyzhenskaja 1967) and
Argentina, Tucuman, [Sleumer 1755 (LIL 19853'.)]. The
latter specimen was referred to R. campbelliana by
Hassel de Menendez (1963) but it is doubtful whether it
has been correctly identified as it lacks ‘idioblasts’ and
the scales are deep red and large, definitely not inconspi-
cuous; only the ornamentation of the spores shows some
resemblance.
R. campbelliana is a very rare species with a strikingly
disjunct distribution, viz. North America, (?) South
America, South Africa and central Asia. These ‘relictual
areas’ (Wulff 1950), may have resulted from interme-
diate localities becoming extinct, as the transport of
spores over such immense distances in modern times by
for example, migratory birds, can hardly be accepted.
Consequently, R. campbelliana is regarded as a very
ancient species, similar to the almost equally rare R.
crustata Trabut with remnant populations likewise
spread over several continents, namely Central Asia
(Kazakhstan), Europe, North Africa (Jovet-Ast 1973)
and, if it were agreed that R. crustata and R. albida
Sullivant ex Austin constitute a single species (Jovet-Ast
1986; Scott & Bradshaw 1986), also occurring in North
America and Australia.
R. campbelliana can be recognized by the yellow-
brown colour along the thallus margins, by the inconspi-
cuous scales, partly hyaline and partly flecked with
brown and violet, and by the sinuous vermicular ridges
on the proximal and distal spore faces. Although small
forms of R. campbelliana bear some resemblance to R.
nigrella, they can be distinguished by the usually wider
and longer branches, by the thinner, slightly attenuate
margins and by the epithelial cells that are not persistent.
R. nigrella is generally a smaller plant and it often grows
in rosettes or partial rosettes; the thallus is dorsally deep
brown except toward the apex, the scales are closely
appressed and shiny black; when it sporulates, it is seen
with overlying masses of dark brown spores; the spores
are smaller and have vermicular ridges on the distal face
and generally on the proximal face too.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
Riccia campbelliana
Besides the lectotype specimen (NY), the following
specimens were examined:
South Africa
TRANSVAAL. — 2527 (Rustenburg): 2 km to Derby on road from
Rustenburg ( — CC ) S. M. Perold 888 (PRE). 2528 (Pretoria): 19 km N
of Bronkhorstspruit, overlying granite ( — DC). Volk 811024 (M. PRE).
2529 (Witbank): N of Middelburg, on road R35, at plateau near Klein
Olifants River (— CB), S. M. Perold 69, 80, 81 (PRE); Van Rooy &
S. M. Perold 634, 637, 642 (PRE); Volk81/010 (M, PRE).
O.F.S. — 2828 (Bethlehem): 11 km E of Fouriesburg on road from
Clarens, around weathered sandstone outcrops on slope ( — CB ), S. M.
Perold & Germishuizen 1307 (PRE).
North America
NEBRASKA. — Lancaster Co., Lincoln, Waller Kiener 9961 (US).
KANSAS. — Woodson Co., Baker’s Bluff, R. R. Ireland Jr. 83
(US).
CALIFORNIA. — Balboa Park, San Diego, C. C. Haynes 2823
(US).
South America
ARGENTINA. — Tucuman, Sleumer 1755 ( LIL 19853) (doubtfully
referred to R. campbelliana).
Other species examined
R. breidleri from Austria (B; W), Switzerland (G); R. dictyospora
from North America (G; PRE) and R. macrocar pa from Turkey, Italy
and France (B; W).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank Mme S. Jovet-Ast, hono-
rary professor, Laboratoire de Cryptogamie, Paris, for
drawing our attention to additional North American loca-
lities of R. campbelliana. Sincere thanks are also due to
Dr habil. T. Bomefeld, Am Reelein 1, D-8706,
Hochberg, Germany, for the chromosome counts and
figures. We are grateful to the curators of B; G; NY; US;
W and Fundacion Miguel Lillo, Tucuman, for the loan
of specimens.
REFERENCES
ARNELL, S. 1952. Hepaticae collected in South and West Africa,
1951. Botaniska Notiser 105: 307-315.
BIENFAIT, A. & WATERKEYN, L. 1976. Sur la nature des parois
sporocytaires chez les mousses et chez quelques Pteridophytes.
Etude comparative. Compte rendu hebdomadaire des seances de
I’ Academie des sciences. Paris, ser. D, 282: 2079-2081.
BORNEFELD, T. 1984. Chromosomenanalyse der Gattung Riccia von
Slid- und SW-Afrika und allgemeine Bemerkungen zur Zytoge-
netik der Lebermoose. Nova Hedwigia 40: 313 — 328.
FRYE, T. C. & CLARK, L. 1937. Hepaticae of North America. Uni-
versity of Washington Publications in Biology 6: 1 — 162.
GROLLE, R. 1976. Verzeichnis der Lebermoose Europas und benach-
barter Gebiete. Feddes Repertorium 87: 171—279.
GROLLE, R. 1983. Hepatics of Europe including the Azores: an anno-
tated list of species, with synonyms from recent literature. Jour-
nal of Bryology 12: 403—459.
HASSEL DE MENENDEZ, G. G. 1962. Estudio de las Anthocero-
tales y Marchantiales de la Argentina. Opera Lilloana 7: 1 -297.
HOWE, M. A. 1899. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotes of California.
Memoirs of the Torrey Botanical Clubl: 13—33.
HOWE, M. A. 1901. Riccia beyrichiana and Riccia dictyospora. Bul-
letin of the Torrey Botanical Club 28: 161-165.
JACOBS, D. L. 1951. Ricciaceae of Arkansas. The Brvologist 54:
274-277.
JOVET-AST, S. 1969. Le caryotype des Ricciaceae. Revue Bryologi-
que et Lichenologique 36: 673—689.
JOVET-AST, S. 1973. Complement a l’etude du Riccia crustata Tra-
but. Presence en Australie. Spores et paroi sporale. Revue Bryo-
logique et Lichenologique 39: 167—174.
JOVET-AST, S. 1986. Les Riccia de la Region Mediterraneenne.
Cryptogamie, Bryologique et Lichenologique 7: 287 — 431 .
LADYZHENSKAJA, K. I. 1967. Riccia campbelliana Howe (Hepati-
cae) in USSR. Novitates systematicae plantarum non vascular-
ium 1967: 316—321.
MULLER, K. 1952. Die Lebermoose Europas. In L. Rabenhorst,
Kryptogamen Flora, edn 3, Band 6,1: 1 —756. Leipzig.
42
PEROLD, S. M. & VOLK, O. H. 1988. Studies in the genus Riccia
(Marchantiales) from southern Africa. 9. R. nigrella DC. and the
status of R. capensis. Bothalia 18,1: 43—49.
SCOTT, G. A. M. & BRADSHAW, J. A. 1986. Australian liverworts
(Hepaticae): annotated list of binomials and checklist of pub-
lished species with bibliography. Brunonia 8: 1 — 171.
SILER, M. B. 1934. Chromosome numbers in certain Ricciaceae.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, Washington 20:
603-607.
STEINKAMP, M. P. & DOYLE, W. T. 1979. Spore wall ultrastruc-
ture in four species of the liverwort Riccia. American Journal of
Botany 66: 546—556.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
STEPHANI, F. 1882. Riccia ciliifera Link und Riccia breidleri
Juratzka. Hedwigia 21: 76.
STEPHANI, F- 1885. Riccia breidleri Juratzka. Hedwigia 24: 6, 7.
TATUNO, S. 1941. Zytologische Untersuchungen fiber die Leber-
moose von Japan. Journal of Science Hiroshima University 4:
73-187.
WITTLAKE, E. B. 1954. Hepaticae of Arkansas. The Bryologist 57:
7-18.
WULFF, E. V. 1950. Historical plant geography, pp. 223. Chronica
Botanica.
Bothalia 18,1:43-49(1988)
Studies in the genus Riccia (Marchantiales) from southern Africa. 9.
R. nigrella and the status of R. capensis
S. M. PEROLD* and O. H. VOLK**
Keywords: distribution, Marchantiales, Riccia capensis, R. nigrella, southern Africa, spores
ABSTRACT
R. nigrella DC. (Lamarck & De Candolle 1815), with which R. capensis auct. non Steph.: S. Amell (1952, 1963), is
conspecific, is now also recognized from southern Africa. The thallus is brown marginally and dorsally and has shiny black
scales with smooth margins at which coloured and hyaline cells alternate irregularly. Amell's ( 1961 ) records of R. capensis
Steph. from the Canary Islands are to be regarded as erroneous. R. capensis Steph. (Stephani in Brunnthaler 1913) is now
placed in synonymy under/?, limbata Bisch.
UITTREKSEL
R. nigrella DC. (Lamarck & De Candolle 1815), waarmee R. capensis auct. non Steph.: S. Amell (1952, 1963),
konspesifiek is, word nou ook uit suidelike Afrika aangemeld. Die tallus is bruin langs die rande en dorsaal en besit blink,
swart, gaafrandige skubbe met onreelmatig afwisselende, gekleurde en hialine selle. Amell se gegewens oor die versprei-
ding van R. capensis Steph. in die Kanariese eilande moet as foutief beskou word. R. capensis Steph. (Stephani in Brunn-
thaler 1913) is ’n sinoniem van R. limbata Bisch.
Riccia nigrella DC. in Lamarck & De Candolle,
Flore Frangaise 6: 193 (1815); Gottsche et al.\ 605
(1844); Camus: 212 (1892); Stephani: 334 (1898);
Howe: 28 (1899); Boulay: 210 (1904); Casares-Gil: 220
(1919); Macvicar: 24 (1926); Frye & Clark: 21 (1937);
Muller: 465 (1952); Na-Thalang: 93 (1980); Jovet-Ast:
323(1986),
TYPE. — France, Dept, de l’Heraut, in sylvula Gram-
mont prope Monspessulanum, Bouchet 1807 [PC, holo.,
fide Jovet-Ast: 323 (1986); G (G23307), iso.!].
R. aggregata Underw.: 275 (1894) after Howe (1899).
R.pearsoni(i) Steph.: 27 (1898); Steph.: 335, 336(1898).
R.porosa TayL: 416 (1846); pp. fide Na-Thalang: 93 (1980).
R. capensis auct. non Steph.: S. Amell:312 (1952); S. Amell: 28
(1963).
Thallus monoecious, perennial, in complete or incom-
plete rosettes, 8-15 mm across (Figure 2A), or scat-
tered; generally rather small; simple or once to twice
furcate, branches narrowly to moderately divergent, ob-
long to linear-ovate (Figures 1A1-4, 2B), up to 5 mm,
occasionally up to 8 mm long, 0,5- 1 ,0 mm broad, once
to twice broader than thick; margins acute, slightly
recurved, becoming somewhat obtuse toward base; apex
rounded or subacute, emarginate; sulcus narrow and
deep, visible along whole length of thallus (Figures
1B1-1B4, 2C), except at sporangia, sides convex;
dorsally glaucous green to green, shiny, soon turning
brown along margins, over older parts and sporangia;
flanks steep, dark-coloured, covered by closely
appressed, shiny black scales (Figure IE); ventral sur-
face rounded, green, often flecked with brown or purple;
* Botanical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and Water
Supply, Private Bag X 101 , Pretoria 0001 .
** Botanische Anstalten d. Univ. Wurzburg D8700, Germany. B.R.D.
MS. received: 1987.04.13.
when dry, scales cover most of dorsal surface, sides
tightly indexed distally, clasped together, except over
sporangia and over proximal part of branches; margins
raised and erect toward base. Anatomy of thallus: dorsal
epithelium unistratose, cells 25-35 x 25-32 gm, short
rectangular or subquadrate, dorsally rounded to nearly
flat, persistent, (Figure 1C), often hyaline, but mostly
with metachromatic contents, air pores small, usually
triangular, ± 7,5 gun wide (Figures ID, 2D); assimila-
tion tissue occupying about / the thickness of thallus,
consisting of 6-10 cells in vertical rows (Figure 1C),
cells 25-30 x 20-25 gun, rarely a few cells enlarged
and somewhat distended, up to 62 x 32 gun with hyaline
or brownish contents, referred to as ‘idioblasts’ (Figure
2F); storage tissue with cells closely packed, angular, ±
30 gun wide, many containing chloroplasts; ventral epi-
dermal cells often coloured brown or violet (Figure 2E).
Rhizoids, some smooth, others tuberculate, ± 20 gun
wide. Scales semilunar, imbricate, not extending above
thallus margin (Figure 2C), size up to 550 x 450 gun,
shiny violet-black, distal margin hyaline, sometimes
single cells in interior reddish or hyaline, others deep
purple to black, occasionally coloured and hyaline cells
alternate irregularly at ± smooth margin, resembling a
'battlement’ or dentate outline; cells rectangular or short
hexagonal, in body of scale up to ± 52 x 25 gun, smal-
ler at margin (Figure IF), cell walls straight. Antheridia
with hyaline necks. Archegonia with purple necks, in
rows. Sporangia protruding dorsally, 300-400 gun in
diameter, occupying nearly the whole width of thallus,
in a row or crowded together, containing about 160-230
spores each, overlying tissue dark brown, breaking down
over ripe capsules and leaving a large hollow filled with
many spores. Spores (62,5 — )70, 0-85, 0(— 87,5) gun in
diameter, triangular-globular, polar, light to dark brown,
with wing narrow (Figure 3E), 2, 5-5,0 gun wide,
notched or with a pore at angles, margin finely crenulate;
distal face incompletely reticulate with about 10-12 ir-
regularly shaped areolae across, or vermicular with
thickened, short, sinuous ridges, ± 2,5 gun wide, which
44
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
FIGURE 1. — Riccia nigrella. Structure of thallus, scales and chromosomes. Al-4, thalli; Bl-4, transverse sections of thallus branch at
intervals along its length; C, transverse section showing dorsal cells, chlorenchyma and storage tissue; D, dorsal cells and air pores from
above; E, flank with scales and rhizoids; F, scales (dotted = dark purple; hatched = reddish); G, chromosomes. (Al, A3, C-G, Volk
8l-2l4c\ A2, Volk 81-289\ A4, Bl-4, 5. M. Perold520). (A-F, by Volk;G, by Bomefeld). Scale baron Al-4, E = 1 mm; Bl^f,C
= 500 fim; D, F, - 100 /am ; G = I /am.
Bothaiia 18,1 (1988)
45
FIGURE 2.—R. nigrella. Structure of thallus and cells. A, rosettes; B, dorsal surface view of thallus; C, apex, groove and
scales; D, dorsal epithelial cells and air pores; E, transverse section through branch, unstained; F, more enlarged
transverse section through thallus branch, showing dorsal epithelial cells with finely granular contents, with unusually
many ‘idioblasts' in bottom left comer). [A, F, Volk 81 -214c ; B-D, Volk 85-802 ; E, S. M. Perold 1147). [A.
photograph by Volk; B-D, SEM micrographs; E & F, LM (light microscope) micrographs by Perold). Scale baron A
= 1 mm; on B-F = 50 /am.
are often roughened with fine granules or papillae (Fig-
ure 3C, D, F); proximal face with triradiate mark dis-
tinct, its arms often wider at juncture with wing, about
30 small, rounded areolae on each of 3 facets, 2, 5-5,0
/i.m wide, ridges thick, slightly raised at nodes (Figure
3A, B). Chromosome number n = 8 (Figure 1G) (Borne-
feld 1984 on Volk 81 -214c (as cf. R. pottsiana)', Na-
Thalang (1980, Australia); Jovet-Ast (1986, France).
In R. nigrella, the dorsal and ventral epithelial cells
frequently contain hyaline or brownish metachromatic
substances which stain blue with dilute aqueous solu-
tions of Toluidine blue, as do the ‘idioblasts’ of R. camp-
belliana (Perold & Volk 1988). Rarely, enlarged cells
with a similar substance are also found in the assimila-
tion and storage tissues of the thallus. In old specimens
the contents of the dorsal cells may have shrunken away
from the cell walls and are bright orange. European
authors excepted, several others have commented on the
striking character and the affinity the persistent dorsal
epithelial cells have for certain stains (Howe 1899; Frye
& Clark 1937; Na-Thalang 1980).
In southern Africa R. nigrella occurs quite rarely in
the summer rainfall areas (with a moderately high annual
precipitation up to 700 mm), of central and southern
Transvaal, Natal, eastern and southern Orange Free
State. It is more common in south-western and north-
46
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
FIGURE 3. — R. nigrella. Spores. A, proximal face; B, viewed from side; C, distal face; D, distal side; E, more enlarged
view of ridges on distal face; F, distal face. (A, B. Duthie 5019a; C-E, Laxly 5023; F, Arnell 792). (A-E, SEM
micrographs and F, LM micrograph by Perold). Scale bar = 50 /u.m; diameter of spore on F, ± 80 /xm.
western Cape Province, extending to the southernmost
part of South West Africa/Namibia, which are winter
rainfall areas (Figure 4), with low annual precipitation
ranging from less than 200 to 500 mm. It grows at alti-
tudes between 200 and 1 800 m above sea level and
prefers very shallow, sandy to dusty, acid soils overlying
rock outcrops. R. nigrella is able to survive and propa-
gate vegetatively by forming small, round, perennating
turions. It is often associated with other xerophilous Ric-
cia species, e.g. R. okahcmdjana S. Arnell and/or R.
atropurpurea Sim, and occasionally with R. campbel-
liana Howe. It can be distinguished from the other sou-
thern African species with shiny black scales by its gen-
erally smaller size, by scales that are closely appressed
and do not extend above the thallus margins and by the
dark brown dorsal colour. It bears some resemblance to a
small R. campbelliana, which is also brown dorsally,
and occasionally a few ‘idioblasts’ are also present in the
inner tissues of R. nigrella. R. nigrella grows diffusely
or in partial or complete rosettes. When sporulating, it is
seen with overlying clumps of large numbers of dark
brown spores.
This nearly cosmopolitan species (Jovet-Ast 1986) is
found in all countries bordering the Mediterranean, and
in Wales, Cornwall, the Channel Islands, the Macarone-
sian Islands (Madeira, Azores and the Canaries), North
America, Australia, and now also in southern Africa.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
47
FIGURE 4. — Map showing distribution of R. nigrella in southern Africa.
THE STATUS OF R. CAPENSIS AUCT. NON STEPH.: S. ARNELL
R. capensis auct. non Steph .: S. Arnell is conspecific
with R. nigrella DC.
While visiting South Africa in the early nineteen fif-
ties, Arnell collected a number of specimens of a small,
black-scaled Riccia species (held at BOL, PRE, S and
UPS). He experienced problems in correctly identifying
his collections and originally named them R. brunomar-
ginata. Later he changed his mind and thought he was
dealing with R. capensis Steph., but when he (Arnell
1952) examined the type specimen of R. capensis
Steph., leg. Brunnt haler, Gnadenthal, from W, the
packet contained only sand and no Riccia could be
found. He obviously did not know of Brunnthaler’s col-
lection [(G 1 3334!) held at G], on which Stephani had
based his diagnosis of R. capensis. His only recourse
therefore, was to rely on Stephani’s drawings in the lat-
ter’s unpublished leones hepaticarum (G; M). As the
transverse sections of the thalli of his collections seemed
to him to be similar to Stephani’s figures of R. capensis,
he chose his specimens Arnell 59 (S) & 162 (BOL) as
types for R. capensis sensu Arnell (Arnell 1952, 1963).
The authors have now found that these and all the other
specimens named R. capensis by Arnell, are in fact R.
nigrella. He thus misapplied the name R. capensis
Steph. when he referred his own and other collections of
R. nigrella to R. capensis Steph. and in so doing, failed
to recognize R. nigrella in the south-western Cape Pro-
vince. R. nigrella DC. is accordingly newly reported
from southern Africa and Arnell’ s collections of R. ca-
pensis have to be renamed as such.
Arnell (1952) noted that his specimens with their
black scales looked like R. limbata Bisch., but were
much smaller and had quite differently ornamented
spores (see below under The status of R. capensis
Steph.)\ he seems to have ignored Stephani’s thallus di-
mensions of 2,5 mm wide, which are definitely those of
a wider plant. Furthermore, he incorrectly (and mislea-
dingly) described the scale margins of his plants as ‘qua-
drangularly serrate’ (1952) and as ‘irregularly dentate’
(1963), which indicates that he did not notice the hyaline
cells in between the dark cells at the ± smooth margins.
Serrate or dentate scale margins rarely occur in the genus
Riccia. The striking colouration of the scales and their
margins in R. nigrella has not been commented on by
previous authors and is only suggested by Macvicar’s
figure (1926: 25). Arnell’s description of the margins
and dorsal surface of the thallus turning yellowish
brown, the deep and sharp dorsal groove with convex
sides and, on transverse section, the rectangular to qua-
drate epithelial cells, indicate that he was referring to R.
nigrella. He reported the spores to be 50-60 p m in
diameter, the ‘ridges often with a brighter midline or two
bright lines and a dark midline’, an effect which is often
seen with thickly ridged aerolar walls.
Besides several places in the Cape Province, Arnell
(1961) also reported his R. capensis from two localities
in the Canary Islands. Despite repeated attempts, these
specimens have not been traced. At UPS only a single
microscope slide labelled ‘ R . capensis Steph. Gran
Canaria, Montana de Tafira', in Arnell’s writing, is
held. On the slide holder he has altered the label to read
R. capensis = macrocarpa. Arnell’s distribution records
for R. capensis in Macaronesia were, however, accepted
and repeated by Eggers (1982), Grolle (1983), Dull
(1984), Sergio (1984). His collections, S. Arnell
281211959 (S; UPS); S. Arnell 4/3/1959 (UPS) and S.
Arnell 5/3/1959 (S; UPS), from La Calzada and Montana
de Tafira, as well as J. Lid 14/2/1954 (UPS), from
Gomera, were seen and the determinations confirmed as
R. nigrella. Two other specimens, S. Arnell 4/3/1959 (S)
and 5. Arnell 7/3/1959 (S), from Montana de Tafira, as
well as one from Las Palmas, S. Arnell 28/12/51 (UPS
20638), that he had referred to R. nigrella, were incor-
rectly determined and are R. trabutiana Steph., which
was not listed by Arnell (1961) as occurring in the
Canary Islands. Some collections of R. atromarginata
and Targionia sp. were also misidentified as R. nigrella.
Arnell furthermore remarked on some resemblance
between R. nigrella and R. atropurpurea Sim (1963: 28)
in the appearance of the thalli, and although they are
both dorsally deeply grooved, somewhat glaucous gray
and shiny when wet, they are quite different in their
margins and scales. The following note which Arnell
wrote to Talbot, was found with a specimen collected by
Pearson 8956 (PRE): T made a mistake in calling this
plant R. nigrella var. austro-africana, as Sim had
already called it R. atropurpurea' , which, however, it is
not either! Arnell identified specimens of R. atropurpu-
rea, Sim July 1920 (PRE; UPS) from the Matopos, Zim-
babwe [Southern Rhodesia], as well as Sim Jan. 1918
(Vereeniging) (PRE) and Volk 2766 Farm Donkerhoek,
SWA (PRE) as R. nigrella var. austro-africana.
THE STATUS OF R. CAPENSIS STEPH.
R. capensis Steph. is now placed in synonymy under R.
limbata Bisch.
R. limbata Bisch. MS. ex Gottsche, Lindenberg et
Nees ab Esenbeck in Synopsis Hepaticarum: 606 (1844);
Stephani: 326 (1898); Sim: 12 (1926); Arnell: 23 (1963).
Type: Cap. Bonae Spei, in locis humidis ad latera Mon-
tium Tafelberg, Duyvelsberg et Leuvenberg, Krauss
Julio 1838 G 1 3 165 (G ,? holo.!); CBS (= Cap. Bonae
Spei), Gnadenthal, Krauss Dec. 1838 (BM! ex Herb.
Hampe).
48
R. capensis Steph. in Denkschriften der Mathematisch-naturwis-
senschaftlichen Klasse der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften
88: 724 (1913). Type: Cape Colony, Gnadenthal by Caledon, Brunn-
thaler Oct. 1909 G 13334 (G!) [G, holo. fide Grolle: 226 (1976), fide
Jovet-Ast in lit.]; W [fide Amell: 312 (1952)] (only sand in specimen
packet).
Stephani was evidently unaware that a paratype speci-
men of R. limbata had also previously been gathered at
Genadendal (by Krauss), when he described R. capensis
as a new species (Stephani 1913) from a specimen col-
lected in October 1909 at Genadendal near Caledon, by
Brunnthaler (G13334). His descriptions of R. capensis
(1913) and R. limbata (1898) differ in that he described
the latter plants as large and four times wider than thick
in cross section, with obliquely sloping flanks, whereas
the former are small, twice as wide as thick and have
erect flanks, indicating that they were not yet fully
grown. In both descriptions he however, referred to the
imbricate, purple scales and the thick thalli.
Examination of Brunnthaler’s collection and compari-
son with the type specimens of R. limbata Bisch., leg.
Krauss July 1838 (G) G 1 3 1 65 and Krauss December
1838 (BM) by the authors, clearly show it to be a speci-
men of R. limbata, generally a medium-sized to large
species, possessing shiny black scales that, however, do
extend beyond the thallus margins; the thalli lack ‘idio-
blasts’ and the spores (recovered from the soil in Brunn-
thaler’s apparently sterile specimen) are large, 100-120
gm in diameter, with the ornamentation on the distal
face typically consisting of parallel rows of papillae spi-
ralling outwards to the wing and the proximal face
almost smooth with scattered pores.
Jovet-Ast (1969) reported the chromosome number for
R. capensis Steph. on a specimen collected by Een,
14/3/1967. This gathering from Tanzania, Serengeti
Park, Senora Lodge, contains only R. congoana Steph.
and R. atropurpurea Sim.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank Dr P. Geissler (G), Dr R.
Grolle (JE) and Dr S. Jovet-Ast (PC) for additional infor-
mation, also Dr T. Bomefeld (Wurzburg) for chromo-
some counts and figures. We are grateful to the curators
of Herbaria B, BCB, BM, BOL, C, Een (Stockholm),
G. Hebrard (Marseille), LISU, MJG, NAM, Ohio State
University, PC, PRC, S, SYD, TFC, UNSW, UPS, US,
W and Z for the loan of specimens.
REFERENCES
ARNELL, S. 1952. Hepaticae collected in South and West Africa,
1951. Botaniska Notiser 105: 307 — 315.
ARNELL, S. 1961. List of the Hepaticae of the Canary Islands. Svensk
botanisk Tidskrift 55: 379-393.
ARNELL, S. 1963. Hepaticae of South Africa, pp. 411 Swedish
National Scientific Research Council, Stockholm.
BOULAY, M. 1904. Muscinees de la France. Hepatiques. pp. 224.
Paris.
BRUNNTHALER, J. 1913. Ergebnisse einer botanischen Forschungs-
reise nach Deutsch-Ostafrika und Sud-Afrika (Kapland, Natal und
Rhodesien). Teil I, p. 14. (Hepaticae bearbeitet von F. Stephani)
in Denkschriften der Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen
Klasse der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften 88: 724.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
CAMUS, F. 1892. Sur le Riccia nigrella DC. Bulletin de la Societe
Botanique de France 39: 212—230.
CASARES-GIL, A. 1919. Flora Iberica — Briofitas, part 1, pp. 775.
Madrid.
DULL, R. 1984. Bryogeographische Analyse der Makaronesischen
Inseln mit besonderer Beriicksichtigung der Kanarischen Inseln
Tenerife und La Palma. Proceedings of the Third Meeting of the
bryologists from central and east Europe, Praha, 14 — 18 June,
1982: 177- 190. Univerzita Karlova, Praha.
EGGERS, J. 1982. Artenliste der Moose Makaronesiens. Cryptoga-
mie, Bryologie et Lichenologie 3,4: 283—335.
FRITSCH, R. 1982. Index to plant chromosome numbers — Bryo-
phyta. Regnum Vegetabile: 108. pp. 268.
FRYE, T. C. & CLARK, L. 1937. Hepaticae of North America. Uni-
versity of Washington Publications in Biology 6: 1 — 162.
GEISSLER, P. 1985. Notulae bryofloristicae helveticae. II. Candollea
40: 193 - 200.
GEISSLER, P. 1987. F. Stephani, leones hepaticarum. IDC Micro-
form Publishers, Zug, Switzerland.
GOTTSCHE, C. M., LINDENBERG, J. B. G. & NEES ab ESEN-
BECK, C. G. 1844. Synopsis hepaticarum. pp. 835. Hamburg.
Reprint 1967. Cramer, Lehre.
GROLLE, R. 1976. Verzeichnis der Lebermoose Europas und benach-
barter Gebiete . Feddes Repertorium 87: 171—279.
GROLLE, R. 1983. Hepatics of Europe including the Azores: an anno-
tated list of species, with synonyms from recent literature. Journal
of Bryology 12: 403-459.
GUNN, M. & CODD, L. 1981. Botanical exploration of southern
Africa, pp. 400. Balkema.
HOWE, M. A. 1899. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotes of California.
Memoirs of the Torrey Botanical Club 7: 13—33.
JOVET-AST, S. 1969. Le caryotype des Ricciaceae. Revue Bryo-
logique et Lichenologique 36: 673-689.
JOVET-AST, S. 1986. Les Riccia de la Region Mediterraneenne.
Cryptogamie, Bryologie et Lichenologie 7: 287-431 .
JOVET-AST, S. & BISCHLER, H. 1972. Les Hepatiques de Tunisie.
Enumeration, notes ecologiques et biogeographiques. Revue
Bryologique et Lichenologique 38: 1-125.
LAMARCK, J. B. DE & DE CANDOLLE, A.-P. 1815. Flore Fran-
gaise, edn 5,6: 193, 194.
MACVICAR, S. M. 1926. The student' s handbook of British hepatics.
pp. 464. Eastbourne. Reprinted 1964.
MULLER, K. 1952. Die Lebermoose Europas. In L. Rabenhorst,
Kryptogamen-Flora, 6,1: 1-756, 3rd edn. Leipzig.
NA-THALANG, O. 1980. A revision of the genus Riccia (Hepaticae)
in Australia. Brunonia 3: 61 - 140.
NEES ab ESENBECK, C. G. 1838. Naturgeschichte der europaischen
Lebermoose A: 1—540.
PATON, J. A. 1976. Distribution maps of bryophytes in Britain and
Ireland. Journal of Bryology 9: 107-123.
PEROLD, S. M. & VOLK, O.H. 1988. Studies in the genus Riccia
(Marchantiales) from southern Africa. 8. R. campbelliana, (sub-
genus Riccia), newly recorded for the region. Bothalia 18:
37-42.
SCOTT, G. A. M. & BRADSHAW, J. A. 1986. Australian liverworts
(Hepaticae): annotated list of binomials and checklist of published
species with bibliography. Brunonia 8: 1-171.
SERGIO, C. 1984. The distribution and origin of Macaronesian bryo-
phyte flora. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 56:
7-13.
SIM, T. R. 1926. The bryophytes of South Africa. Transactions of the
Royal Society of South Africa 15: 1 -475. Cape Town.
STEPHANI, F. 1876-1907. leones hepaticarum. P. Geissler (ed. ).
IDC Microform Publishers, Zug, Switzerland.
STEPHANI, F. 1898. Species hepaticarum. Bulletin de I'Herbier Bois-
sier 6:309-411.
STEPHANI, F. 1913. See under Brunnthaler.
TAYLOR, T. 1846. New hepaticae. The London Journal of Botany 5:
365.
UNDERWOOD, L. M. 1894. Notes on our Hepaticae. II. The genus
Riccia. Botanical Gazette ( Crawfordsville ) 19: 273-278.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
49
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
R. nigrella
Southern Africa
SWA/NAMIBIA.— 2718 (Grunau): Noachabeb (-BC), Ortendahl
14. vi. 1931 (UPS).
TRANSVAAL. — 2527 (Rustenburg): 2 km to Derby on road from
Rustenburg (— CC), S. M. Perold 888a (PRE). 2528 (Pretoria): 19 km
N of Bronkhorstspruit (-DC), S. M. Perold 150, 320 (PRE); Volk
811023 (M, PRE). 2530 (Lydenburg): 29 km to Dullstroom on R540
( — AB), S. M. Perold 425 (PRE). 2630 (Carolina): Chrissiemeer, Farm
Knock Dhu (-AD), Smook4892a (PRE). 2729 (Volksrust): 9 km from
Amersfoort on road to Perdekop (— BB), S. M. Perold 1088a (PRE).
O.F.S. — 2729 (Volksrust): 31 km NE of Verkykerskop, on road
from Memel (-CD), S. M. Perold 1274 (PRE); 2827 (Senekal): Alle-
manskraal Dam, on plateau near caravan park (-AC), Volk 811214c
(M, PRE); Senekal, near reservoir on koppie (-BC), S. M. Perold
1336, 1340 (PRE); 6 km N of Clocolan on road to Marquard (-DC),
S. M. Perold 1322 (PRE). 2926 (Bloemfontein): Bloemfontein
(-AA), Duthie 5457a, 5494a (BOL); Bloemfontein, next to Bot. Gar-
den (-AA), Volk 81-289 p.p. (M); 30 km S of Bloemfontein on N1
(-AC), S. M. Perold 956 (PRE). 2927 (Maseru): 10 km from Lady-
brand on R26 ( — AC), J. M. Perold 35b (PRE). 3026 (Aliwal North):
between Zastron and Wesselsdale, Farm Olievenrand (-BB), Van
Rooy 2414, 2417 ( PRE).
NATAL. — 2930 (Pietermaritzburg): Edendale (-CB), Sim CH 1025
(with R. atropurpurea) (PRE).
CAPE. — 2917 (Springbok): Komaggas, top of T'nouroegas — Van
Reenen se water plateau (-DA), Glen 1472, 1585 (PRE). 2924 (Hope-
town): 54 km from Kimberley on road to Hayfields (-BA), Smook
3544a (PRE). 3024 (De Aar): 25 km from De Aaron road to Phillips-
town. Farm Welgegund ( — AC), Smook 3418a (PRE). 3027 (Lady
Grey): 23 km S of Lady Grey (— CC), Van Rooy 2598 (PRE). 3218
(Clanwilliam): 20 km N of Citrusdal, near Farm Hexrivier ( — BD ),
S. M. Perold 533 (PRE); Weltevrede, 7 km W of Piketberg (-DC),
S. M. Perold 501 (PRE); Middelpos (-DC)S. M. Perold 506 (PRE).
3219 (Wuppertal): 18 km S of Citrusdal (-CA), S. M. Perold 520
(PRE). 3225 (Somerset East): Cradock Mtn Zebra Park ( — AD), Smook
6028 (PRE). 3318 (Cape Town): Lion's Head (-CD), Arnell 26, 36
(S): Arnell 49, 59 (S, UPS); Arnell 50 (BOL); Newlands, Pillans’s
garden (-CD), Garside 6650 (BOL); Newlands, Schelpe’s garden
(-CD), Lambert 1 (BOL, PRE); near University of Cape Town
(-CD), Loxly 5023 (BOL); Tamboerskloof (-CD), P.K. 5368 (BOL);
Rosebank (-CD), leg. unknown 5023 (BOL); Stellenbosch ( — DD),
leg. unknown 5019a (BOL); Glen Bawn ( — DD), Duthie 5340 (BOL);
13 km from Franschhoek on road to Paarl (-DD), S. M. Perold 1147
(PRE). 3319 (Worcester): Tulbagh ( — AC), Vogel C682 (MJG, PRE).
3320 (Montagu): ‘Witteberge' turnoff on Nl. before Laingsburg
(-AB), C. M. van Wvk 2523, 2525 (PRE); Cogman’s Kloof (-CC),
Arnell 792 (BOL, PRE, S, UPS); Arnell 802 (BOL, PRE, S). 3418
(Simonstown): Wynberg Park Hotel garden ( — AB), Arnell 150 (BOL,
PRE, S); Arnell 162 (PRE); 186 (S); 189, 302 (BOL); 302a & b (S);
near Eerste River (-BA), Van Brake! 5019 (BOL). 3419 (Caledon):
Greyton, kloof, on earth bank (- BA), S. M. Perold 1171a (PRE).
Europe
BRITAIN . — Pearson 290 (C); April 1877 CH542, June 1879
CH473 (PRE); May 1885 (S); April 1881 (UPS).
PORTUGAL. — Casas et al.2,4, 10, 11 (LISU); Sergio et al. 26.1,
28.3 (LISU).
SPAIN.— S. Arnell 6.5.1960 (S); S. Arnell 3.5.1960 (UPS); Casas
12.4.57, 16.4.1957, 4.4.1958, 25.9.76, 3.1.1984 , 2.5.1984 (BCB);
Cros etal. (BCB); Volk 75-584, 82-983 (M).
FRANCE. — D' A rice Fevr. ’84 (UPS)', D’Arice Mars ’89 (UPS);
Boulay Avril '96 (UPS); Crozals 311902 (ex Schiffner) (W, S); De
Sloover 25.130 (PRC); Hebrard 1-4382, 1-5283, 3-14586 (Private
Herb. J. P. Hebrard )\K. Preis 27.5 .37; JirtVana4.4.1977 (PRC).
ITALY.—//. Gams 3.4.37 (GB, S); 15.2.1952 (S); Levier (Bryo-
theca Italica; ex herb. Guzelberg; G, S, UPS); Milde 2 Aug. ’97 (UPS);
Oliver April 1867 (UPS).
YUGOSLAVIA. — Baumgartner 5.4.1908, 15.3.1910, 28.6.1911,
19.4.1913 (W); Glowacki 26.7.1896 (S); Latzel 10 Febr. 1908:
Schiffner 10.4.1909, 12.4.1909 ; Weiss29Jan. 1867 ( W).
GREECE. — Volk 85-802, 86-948 (M).
NORTH AFRICA. — Trabut, March 1908, 1171 (1939) (S).
Macaronesia
CANARY ISLANDS.— S. Arnell 28.2.1959, 5.3.1959 (S); Losada
& Rivero (TFC).
MADEIRA ARCHIPELAGO— M. Nobrega 20.1.1954, 21.1.
1954, 4. 11. 1953 (S).
United States of America
CALIFORNIA.—//. N. Bolander 26: Brandeger 1892 (NY); A. M.
Carter 252 (PRC); Howe 165 (NY); April 1894 (Ohio State Univ.);
Feb. 8, 1896 (W); E. W . Koch s.n.: Dale M . J . Mueller 6905, Walter
R. Shaw 1901; no collector’ s name, 1704 (in part), 1729: no collector’ s
name or number (NY).
MISSOURI. — J. A. Steyermark428 (NY).
PENNSYLVANIA. — T. C. Porter s.n. (NY).
TEXAS.—/7. McAllister, March 1929 :M. S. Young ( NY).
Australia
NEW SOUTH WALES. — Na-Thalang 54, 72. (SYD).
SOUTH AUSTRALIA. — Na-Thalang 126 (SYD).
R. trabutiana Steph. incorrectly determined as R. ni-
grella
PORTUGAL. — Casas et al. 2, /O(LISU).
CANARY ISLANDS. — S. Arnell 4.3.1959, 7.3.1959 (S); 28.12.
1951 (UPS).
R. atromarginata Lev. incorrectly determined as R.
nigrella
SPAIN.— S. Rungly 2931 (C).
FRANCE. — S. Arnell 16.7.53 (UPS).
R. congoana Steph. incorrectly determined as R. capen-
sis Steph.
TANZANIA.— G. Een 14.3.1967. (Herb. Een, S).
R. atropurpurea Sim incorrectly determined as R. ni-
grella var. austro-africana
ZIMBABWE. — Sim July 1920 (PRE, UPS).
SWA/NAMIBIA. — Volk 2766 (PRE).
TRANSVAAL. — Sim Jan. 1918 (PRE).
Bothalia 18,1:51-56(1988)
Two closely related species of Caloplaca (Teloschistaceae, Lichenes)
from the Namih Desert
I. KARNEFELT*
Keywords: anatomy, Caloplaca elegantissima, C. namibensis, sp. nov., Lichenes, Namib Desert. Teloschistaceae
ABSTRACT
The anatomical and reproductive adaptations of two closely related lichen species, Caloplaca elegantissima (Nyl.)
Zahlbr. and C. namibensis Kamef., sp. nov., occurring in the outer Namib fog desert, are discussed. Both species belong
to the crustose forms, frequently found in the remarkably rich lichen communities, which largely depend on fog precipita-
tion for their water supply. Both species are endemic to the Namib Desert. They are mainly distributed in South West
Africa/Namibia but also extend into south-western Angola. The asexual isidiate species, C. namibensis Kamef., is
described as new.
UITTREKSEL
Die anatomiese en voortplantingsaanpassings van twee naverwante ligeenspesies, Caloplaca elegantissima (Nyl.)
Zahlbr. en C. namibensis Kamef., sp. nov., wat in die buitenste Namib-miswoestyn voorkom, word bespreek. Albei
spesies behoort tot die korsagtige vorms wat dikwels aangetref word in die buitengewoon ryk ligeengemeenskappe wat
hoofsaaklik van die misneerslag afhanklik is vir water. Albei spesies is endemies in die Namibwoestyn. Hulle kom
hoofsaaklik in Suidwes-Afrika/Namibie voor maar is ook tot in suidwestelike Angola versprei. Die ongeslagtelike isidiate
spesie C. namibensis Kamef. word nuut beskryf.
INTRODUCTION
The Namib is a narrow belt of desert more than 2 000
km long, stretching northwards from the Olifants River
in the Cape Province (RSA) to Mossamedes in Angola.
The central Namib Desert is characterized by the world's
most magnificent sand dunes. The gravel desert, occupy-
ing most of the landward parts of the central and northern
Namib Desert, is usually almost devoid of higher plants.
The few which occur are mainly succulents with specia-
lized anatomical and physiological adaptations to survive
in the harsh environment (Walter 1973; White 1983).
Ephemeral species appear only after extremely rare rain
showers.
The desert is, however, not entirely devoid of vegeta-
tion. Rock outcrops, stones and pebbles are frequently
covered with colourful lichens. Even the seemingly bar-
ren soil can be covered with fruticose lichens over large
areas, similar to the lichen cover which is a familiar sight
in arctic or subarctic regions in the northern hemisphere.
Kappen (1982) estimated the biomass in one of these
areas at 250 g/m2. The existence of this spectacular
lichen vegetation is entirely due to the effect of frequent
fogs. These fogs are caused by the cold Benguela current
which flows northwards from the southern Atlantic
Ocean along the south-western coast of Africa. Fog-
induced lichen communities also occur in the coastal
deserts of Peru and Baja California (Thomson & litis
1968; Rundel etal. 1972).
Lichens occurring in these coastal desert areas can
evidently absorb sufficient amounts of moisture from fog
to allow photosynthesis for successful reproduction and
dispersal. Lange et al. (1970a, 1970b) studied the effect
of dew on lichen communities in the Negev Desert.
* Department of Systematic Botany, University of Lund, Ostra
Vallgatan 18, 223 61 Lund, Sweden.
MS. received: 1986.10.13.
According to them the early morning dew provided suffi-
cient moisture for about 3 h of photosynthesis. Apart
from the effect of fog, the annual precipitation in the
central Namib is not more than 30 mm, and it may not
even rain every year (Kappen 1982).
More or less well known lichens occurring in the
desert are Combea mollusca (Ach.) Nyl., Santessonia
namibensis Hale & Vobis, Teloschistes capensis (L. f.)
Miill. Arg., Xanthomaculina convoluta (Hue) Hale,
Xanthomaculina hottentotta (Ach.) Hale and Xanthoria
marlothii Zahlbr. All these species have various anatom-
ical adaptations which aid in the reduction of light inten-
sity and evaporation. Biidel & Wessels (1986) discussed
the remarkable anatomical adaptions of Xanthomaculina
convoluta (as Parmelia hueana Gyeln.). It is presumed
that heavily pigmented layers, as encountered in Xantho-
dactylon flammeum (L. f.) Dodge, could be effective in
reducing light intensity. Members of this species are less
deeply pigmented in populations further south, in the
Cape Province.
Teloschistes capensis (L. f.) Miill. Arg., forms exten-
sive populations in areas north of Swakopmund, and has
a deeper pigmentation than similar populations found in
the Cape. Individuals which occur in the central Namib
are furthermore covered by a rather dense tomentum,
which is much sparser in the Cape. Presumably this
dense tomentum favours the absorption of water derived
from the coastal fog.
Caloplaca eudoxa (Miill. Arg.) Zahlbr. is another
remarkable endemic member of the Namib lichen flora.
The species is characterized by a subfruticose growth
form and thick scleroplectenchymatous hyphae which
cover the photobiont (Poelt & Pelleter 1984). The two
Caloplaca species discussed in this paper, C. elegantis-
sima (Nyl.) Zahlbr. and C. namibensis Kamef., have
52
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
similar anatomical adaptations. They are among the most through a Leitz, Ortholux microscope. Secondary corn-
abundant and spectacular crustose lichen species pounds present in the material were determined by
endemic to the Namib. means of standardized TLC methods (Culberson 1972).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
THE SPECIES
The material which formed the basis of this study
came mainly from my own collections made during a
visit to the central Namib fog desert in January 1986. I
have also studied a few collections on loan from B, BM,
G, H, LISU and S. The macrophotographs were taken
with an Olympus OM-2 camera, through a Zeiss dissect-
ing microscope.
For anatomical studies, the material was sectioned on
a Kryomat, Leitz freezing microtome. The sections were
embedded in lactophenol cotton-blue, studied, and
photographed by means of an Olympus OM-2 camera.
1. Caloplaca elegantissima (Nyl.) Zahlbr., Cata-
logus lichenum universalis 7: 238 (1931). Lecanora ele-
gantissima Nyl.: 510 (1868). Type: SWA/Namibia,
2114 (Omaruru): Lagunenberg Mountain, north-east of
Mile 72 (— CC), Karnefelt 8605—26 (LD, neo., here
designated).
Caloplaca diploplaca Zahlbr.: 268 (1932). Type: SWA/Namibia,
1927, Kriege sub P. van der Byl 709 (STEU, lecto. , selected here).
Caloplaca indurata Wirth & Vezda: 1 (1975). Type: Africa austro-
occidentalis, Swakopmund, 15 km ad orientem urbis Swakopmund,
Sept. 1974, Volk, in Vezda, Lich. sel. exs. 1346 (STU, holo.; iso.
distributed in Vezda, Lich. sel. exs. 1346, seen in H, LD, S).
FIGURE 1 . — a, C. namibensis, cross section, dark pigmented layer and thick cortical layer covering the darkly stained photobiont, Karnefelt
8602-56 (LD), bar = 100 /xm; b, C. namibensis, cross section, Karnefelt 8602-56 (LD), bar = 100 /xm; c, C. namibensis, cross section
showing structure of cortical layer, Karnefelt 8603a-5 (LD), bar = 10 pm; d, C. elegantissima, cross section showing structure of cortical
layer, Desmond 25276 (LD), bar = 10 pm; e, C. elegantissima, cross section of specimen showing the internal pigmented layer and thick
cortical layer covering the basally located photobiont, overlying a medullary layer with crystals, Vezda, Lich. sel. exs. 1346 (LD), bar =
100 /xm; f, C. elegantissima, cross section showing the internal pigmented layer, Vezda, Lich. sel. exs. 1346 (LD), bar = 10 /xm.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
53
Thallus radiate, (5— )20— 50(— 100) mm across, the
smallest occurring on pebbles, the largest on rather large
rocks, composed of cartilaginous convex lobes 0,5-1 ,8
mm broad, 5-30 mm long, marginally distinctively effi-
gurated, weakly dichotomously branched, secondarily
becoming raised and unattached; central portions com-
posed of short, 1-3 mm long, irregularly arranged,
rather sparse lobes; short accessory lobules occasionally
developed at the margins of the lobes; scarlet, orange-red
to pale orange, larger individuals usually lighter pig-
mented at margins.
Epinecral zone 20-45 pm thick, prosoplectenchyma-
tous, hyphae thick-walled (Figure Id, e). Cortex hya-
line, 150-230 pm thick, composed of strongly gelati-
nized hyphae, the upper 15-20 /xm, orange-yellowish
pigmented (Figure Id, e, f). Photobiont green and sphe-
rical, 5,5—12 pm in diameter, occurring in clusters
35-75 jam large, mainly embedded in a layer of
strongly gelatinized hyphae. Medulla 200-250 pm
thick, composed of more lax hyphae, partly embedding
the clustered photobiont, often containing numerous
small granules, fluorescent when examined with inter-
ference contrast microscopy.
Apothecia scattered, limited mainly to central thallus
portions, but may also develop marginally on the peri-
pheral lobes, sessile, becoming slightly raised with
maturity, 0,5— 1 ,5 mm across, margin entire or occasio-
nally irregular, several smaller apothecia occasionally
fused; disc at first cupular or plane, becoming strongly
convex, usually darker or of the same colour as the
lobes. Excipulum up to 100 pm thick. Hymenium
75—100 pm thick, covered by a thin epihymenial layer.
Asci 45-50 x 9—12 pm. Ascospores broadly ellipsoi-
dal, 10—12 x 8—9 pm, septum ± 2 pm thick. Para-
physes 75—100 x 0,75 pm. Hypothecium up to 300 jum
deep, hyaline. Photobiont concentrated in clusters below
the hypothecium. Conidiomata not observed.
SWA/NAMIBIA. — 2113 (Cape Cross): Skeleton Coast Park,
marble ridge north of entrance gate at Ugabmund (-BA), Karnefelt
8609-5 ; 8609-6- 8609-22 ; 8609-24 ; 8609-30: 8609-39 (LD). 2114
(Omaruru): Lagunenberg Mountain, north-east of Mile 72 (-CC),
Karnefelt 8605-19: 8605-20: 8605-26 (LD); gravel flats east of Cape
Cross (-CA), Karnefelt 8610-29: 8610-37: 8610-38 (LD); Wessels
5132: 5134a (UNIVERSITY OF THE NORTH); 25 km north of Hen-
ties Bay Road junction, black ridge (-CA), Nordenstam & Lundgren
2317 (S). 2214 (Swakopmund): gravel flats east of Swakopmund
(-DA), Karnefelt 8602-33: 8602-34: 8602-19: 8602-52 (LD); 15 km,
in Sept.-oriente a urbe Swakopmund (-DA), 1974, Volk in Vezda,
Lich. sel. exs. 1346 as C. indurata (H, LD, S); 35 km north of Swa-
kopmund (-AD), Nordenstam & Lundgren 2322 (S); Namib Desert
(-??), Desmond 25276 (LD).
C. elegantissima contains several anthraquinones,
which were difficult to separate with the TLC method
used. Extracts of C. elegantissima and C. namibensis
were examined together on the same TLC plate, but the
anthraquinones could not be distinguished due to the
weakness of the spots (the anthraquinones are difficult to
Extract from the cortex). Steiner & Hauschild (1970)
reported the presence of emodin (traces), parietin, telo-
schistin, xanthorin, erythroglaucin, fallacinal and parie-
tinic acid in C. elegantissima. No material was cited, but
it is presumed that the fertile species was investigated as
it is the most conspicuous of the two species.
Typification
The original description of Lecanora (Placodium)
elegantissma was presumably based on composite mate-
rial involving both species discussed in this article. The
short morphological diagnosis described a narrow-lobed
specimen resembling Placodium elegans [=Xanthoria
elegans (Link) Th. Fr. ] , but no isidia or similar struc-
tures were mentioned (Nylander 1868). The diagnosis,
however, included a description of apothecia and asco-
spores and the original spore size mentioned corresponds
well with my own results based on examined asci of C.
elegantissima.
The fragment (annotated ‘vestigio’) in the Nylander
herbarium at Helsinki, does not belong to C. elegantis-
sima but to C. namibensis. It therefore cannot possibly
be used as the type of C. elegantissima. The isidia have,
however, been tom off during more than 100 years of
storage, leaving distinctive marks at their previous loca-
tion (H-NYL 30513).
Nylander cited no material other than Welwitsch’s
collections from Mossamedes (erroneously spelled
Monamedes). In a footnote he discussed a new species
Placodium flavorubens Nyl. [ =Caloplaca flavorubens
(Nyl.) Zahlbr.] occurring on coastal rocks in southern
Africa, which presumably is identical to C. sublobulata
(Nyl.) Zahlbr. Since C. elegantissima and C. namibensis
occur in the same habitats and occasionally also cover
the same stones, Welwitsch most probably collected
both species on a few of the stone samples. On Wel-
witsch’s request, Nylander eventually studied these
samples while in Paris. He must have received a mixed
collection of mainly C. namibensis, which also included
a few lobes and apothecia of C. elegantissima.
Other possible type material from Welwitsch’s origi-
nal collection is kept at BM and LISU (see Vainio 1901 ).
The material I received on loan from these herbaria, no.
45 Welwitsch Iter Angolense, Mossamedes, near Cabo
Negro, unfortunately turned out to belong to the same
species described here as new, and characterized by
rather narrow lobes and small isidia or fragments of
isidia. Vainio (1901) also cited nos 48 and 49 as pr. p.
under his Placodium elegantissimum, but these numbers
are mainly a brown Parmelia, and it is not likely that
Nylander used this material for his original description.
Since all known type material of C. elegantissima
must be superseded as being in serious conflict with the
protologue (Art. 8 of the I.C.B.N.), it is either possible
to choose a neotype, or to have the name rejected in
accordance with Art. 69 of the I.C.B .N. In fact, I did not
see any material in the original collections which corre-
sponds in any way to C. elegantissima, other than the
type material of much younger epithets such as C. diplo-
placa Zahlbruckner (1932) and C. indurata Wirth &
Vezda (1975).
The provisons of Art. 69 (a name must be rejected if it
has been widely and persistently used for a taxon not
including its type), is not really relevant in this case. 1
have therefore decided to select a neotype from my own
collections of C. elegantissima.
54
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
FIGURE 2. — a, Caloplaca elegantissima, well developed fertile specimen on dolerite, Karnefelt 8605-26 (LD); b, C. elegantissima, specimen
dominated by rather short central lobes, on dolerite, Karnefelt 8605- 39 (LD); c, C. elegantissima, specimen on quartzite pebbles,
Karnefelt 8605-19 (LD); d, C. elegantissima close-up of specimen on quartzite pebble; accessory lobules seen in c & d, Karnefelt 8605-20
(LD); e, C. namibensis, close-up of specimen with rather long densely arranged marginal lobes, on quartzite, Karnefelt 8602-36 (LD); f,
C. namibensis, specimen on quartzite pebbles, the central portions covered with minute isidia, Karnefelt 8610-2 (LD). All bars = 10 mm.
2. Caloplaca namibensis Kdrnef. , sp. nov.
ICaloplaca diploplaca Zahlbr. var. gracilior Zahlbr., Annales de
cryptogamie exotique 5: 269 (1932). Type: SWA/Namibia [Deutsch-
Sudwestafrika], Haifischbucht, Fincke (W. not seen).
Thallus Caloplacae elegantissimae similis sed lobis
marginalibus densioribus et angustioribus, partibus lobo-
rum centralium saepe magis areolatis et isidiis sat nume-
rosis instructis differt.
TYPE.— SWA/NAMIBIA, 2114 (Omaruru): gravel
flats east of Cape Cross (— CA), Karnefelt 8610-2 (LD,
holo.).
Thallus radiate, (5 — ) 10 — 30(— 60) mm across, the
smallest occurring on pebbles, occasionally up to 60 mm
across on larger stones, composed of cartilaginous,
rather thin, densely placed lobes, 0,2— 0,5 mm wide.
broadest at the lobe tips; marginal lobes usually 5-15
mm long, distinctively effigurate, weakly dichotomously
branched, secondarily becoming raised and unattached;
central portions composed of short, irregularly arranged
or occasionally more areolated lobes, covered with
simple or coralloid, rather small isidia; short accessory
lobules occasionally develop at the margins of the lobes;
orange to pale orange, the central portions usually pale
brownish due to the accumulation of numerous small
sand grains.
Epinecral zone 10-20 ^tm thick, prosoplectenchyma-
tous, hyphae thick-walled (Figure la, c). Cortex 1 20—
230 (urn thick, composed of strongly gelatinized hyphae,
hyaline but orange-yellowish in a thin layer above (Fig-
ure la, b, c). Photobiont green and spherical, 5,5-12
pm in diameter, occurring in clusters, 35—85 pm large,
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
55
mainly embedded in a layer of gelatinized hyphae. Me-
dulla 200—300 gm thick, composed of more lax hy-
phae, partly embedding the clustered photobiont, often
containing small granules, fluorescent when examined
by means of interference contrast microscopy. Ascomata
and conidiomata not observed.
Caloplaca namibensis contains several anthraqui-
nones which were difficult to separate by means of TLC
(see discussion of C. elegantissima). I have not seen the
type material of Caloplaca diploplaca Zahlbr. var. gra-
cilior Zahlbr. The description, however, indicates that
this taxon belongs to C. namibensis (see Zahlbruckner
1932).
ANGOLA. — 1213: Benguela, Welwitsch s.n., 1859, (H-NYL
30513). 1511: Mossamedes, between Caroca and Cazimba at Cabo
Negro, Welwitsch, Iter Angolense 45 (BM, LISU).
SWA/NAMIBIA. — 21 14 (Omaruru): gravel flats east of Cape Cross
(-CA), Kdrnefelt 8610-2 ; 8610-4 ; 8610-12 ; 8610-15; 8610-18- 8610-
20; 8610-23 ; 8610^42 (LD). 2214 (Swakopmund): gravel flats east of
Swakopmund (-BA), Kdrnefelt 8602-4 ; 8602-7 ; 8602-12 ; 8602-2 1;
8602-23-8602-25 ; 8602-32; 8602-35; 8602-36; 8602-50; 8602-53;
8602-54; 8602-56 (LD); Wessels 5082; 5085; 5087 (UNIVERSITY OF
THE NORTH); Omaruru flumen (— AB), Melander 3 (H); 22 km east
of Walvis Bay (—DC), Nordenstam & Lundgren 2311 (S); between
Swakopmund and Cape Cross (—??), Mattick 6812 (B). 2315
(Rostock): Namib Naukluft Park, Gobabeb, coastal desert habitat
(-CA), Kdrnefelt 8603a-3-8603a-5;8603a-9(LD). 2615 (Luderitz):
Angra Pequena (— CA), 1888 Schinz (G).
Characteristics and differences
C. elegantissima is characterized by slightly sepa-
rated, peripherally effigurated, cartilaginous, strikingly
scarlet or orange-reddish lobes (Figure 2a). The central
part of the thallus, especially in large well developed
individuals, usually consists of short irregularly arranged
lobes (Figure 2b), and the species is often fertile.
C. elegantissima differs from the closely related
C. namibensis, by having slightly broader (0,5- 1,8
mm), and more separated lobes, whereas C. namibensis
has more closely spaced (contiguous) lobes, 0,2-0, 5
mm wide, with almost no interspaces (Figure 2e, f).
However, the main difference between the two species is
that C. namibensis is isidiate, and C. elegantissima is
not. When growing side by side, as is often the case on
the gravel plains, C. elegantissima appears as the more
robust of the two species. The specific epithet elegantis-
sima, therefore describes the isidiate species better than
the sexual one.
Habitat, ecology and reproduction
C. elegantissima and C . namibensis are two of the
most common species in the Namib fog desert. As with
most other species which occur in that region of the
Namib Desert, they seem to be perfectly adapted to the
extreme local environmental conditions.
Two other rather common crustose species, C. volkii
Wirth & Vezda (1975) and Lecidella crystallina
Wirth & Vezda (1975), normally occur directly on the
ground. C. elegantissima and C. namibensis, on the
other hand, grow on rocks of various sizes. Individuals
on small pebbles, obviously a very common occurrence,
can cover the substrate completely (Figure 2c, d).
C. elegantissima, in particular, seems to occur rather
frequently on small pebbles, ± 5 mm in size, whereas
C. namibensis is more common on stones, 10 to 30 mm
in size. The most luxuriant and richly fertile specimens
of C. elegantissima were found on dolerite outcrops
composed of larger stones and rocks. This observation
may be correlated with the effect of drifting fog, which
condenses more rapidly on cooling rock outcrops (Kap-
pen 1982).
Sexual reproduction is presumably an important mode
of dispersal for the frequently richly fertile C. elegantis-
sima, whereas asexual dispersal by means of isidia must
be an important mode of reproduction forC. namibensis,
producing extensive clones. However, accessory lobules
are frequently developed in both species, especially on
smaller individuals growing on pebbles (Figure 2c, d).
Fragmentation of the frequently raised lobes could also
be interpreted as an adaptive arrangement for clonal dis-
persal in this regionally successfully distributed species
pair.
Anatomical adaptations
The most typical environmental adaptation of these
species is the anatomical structure, which is character-
ized by extremely thick external tissue (Figure 1). This
FIGURE 3. — Distribution of Caloplaca elegantissima. Arrow indi-
cates localities in southern Angola.
FIGURE 4. — Distribution of Caloplaca namibensis. Arrow indicates
localities in southern Angola.
56
Bothalia 18,1(1988)
tissue, distinctively stratified into epinecral and cortical
layers, is 185 to 295 jtim thick in C. elegantissima and
130 to 250 fim thick in C. namibensis. The tissue forms
a solid cover over the basally located photobiont (Figure
lc, d). A thick cortical layer acts mainly in reducing the
intensity of light (Kappen 1973; Vogel 1955), in reduc-
ing evaporation loss and also in permitting direct absorp-
tion of water vapour from dry air (Galun 1963; Rogers
1977).
In C. elegantissima, the pigmented cortical zone is
generally better developed than in the closely related
species (Figure le, f). In addition, the cortex in C. el-
egantissima is composed of more strongly gelatinized
hyphae, than that of C. namibensis.
Distribution
C. elegantissima and C. namibensis are endemic to
the outer Namib Desert, and are known to occur from
south-western Angola in the north, to the Liideritz region
in the south (Figures 3 & 4). It is suspected, however,
that the area of both species may extend to the southern
boundary of the Namib Desert. Closely related species
from other coastal fog deserts of the world are not
known.
REFERENCES
BUDEL, B. & WESSELS, D. 1986. Parmelia hueana Gyeln., a
vagrant lichen from the Namib Desert, SWA/Namibia. I. Ana-
tomical and reproductive adaptations. Dinteria 18: 3- 15.
CULBERSON, C. F. 1972. Improved conditions and new data for
identification of lichen products by a standardized thin-layer chro-
matographic method. Journal of Chromatography 72: 113-125.
GALUN, M. 1963. Autecological and synecological observations on
lichens of the Negev, Israel. Israel Journal of Botany 12:
179-187.
KAPPEN, L. 1973. Response to extreme environments. InV. Ahmad-
jian & M. E. Hale, The Lichens: 311—380. Academic Press,
London & New York.
LANGE, O. L , SCHULTZE, E-D. & KOCH, W. 1970a. Experimen-
tell-okologische Untersuchungen an Flechten der Negev-Wiiste.
II. COi-Gaswechsel und Wasserhaushalt von Ramalina macifor-
mis (Del.) Bory am natiirlichen Standort wahrend der sommerli-
chen Trockenperiode. Flora, Jena 159: 38—62.
LANGE, O. L., SCHULTZE, E-D. & KOCH. W. 1970b. Experimen-
tell-okologische Untersuchungen an Flechten der Negev-Wiiste.
III. C02-Gaswechsel und Wasserhaushalt von Krusten-und Blattf-
lechten am natiirlichen Standort wahrend der sommerlichen
Trockenperiode. Flora, Jena 159: 525—538.
NYLANDER, W. 1868. Lichenes angolenses Welwitschiani. Bulletin
de la Societe Linneenne de la Normandie 2, ser. 2: 508— 521 .
POELT, J. & PELLETER, U. 1984. Zwergstrauchige Arten der Flech-
tengattung Caloplaca. Plant Systematics and Evolution 148:
51-88.
ROGERS, R. W. 1977. Lichens of hot arid and semi-arid lands. In
M.R.D. Seaward, Lichen ecology: 211—252. Academic Press,
London, New York & San Francisco.
RUNDEL, P. W., BOWLER, P. A. & MULROY.T. W. 1972. A fog-
induced lichen community from north-western Baja California
with two new species of Desmazieria. The Brvologist 75:
500-508.
STEINER, M. & HAUSCHILD, G. 1970. Die Anthrachinone von
Caloplacaceae und Teloschistaceae (Lichenes). Berichte der
Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft, N. F. 4: 23-34.
THOMSON, J. W. & ILTIS, H. H. 1968. A fog- induced lichen com-
munity in the coastal desert of southern Peru. The Bryologist 71:
31-34.
VAINIO, E. 1901. Lichenes. In Catalogue of the African plants col-
lected by Dr Friedrich Welwitsch in 1853— 61 , 2, 2. Cryptoga-
mia: 396-463. London.
VOGEL, S. 1955. Niedere ‘Fensterpflanzen’ in der siidafrikanischen
Wiiste. Eine okologische Schilderung. Beitrdge zur Biologie der
Pflanzen 31:43—135.
WALTER, H. 1973. Die Vegetation der Erde in oko-physiologischer
Betrachtung. 1. Die tropischen und subtropischen Zonen, 3rd edn.
Fischer, Jena.
WHITE, F. 1983. The Vegetation of Africa. A descriptive memoir to
accompany the UNESCOIAETFATIUNSO vegetation map of
Africa. UNESCO, Paris.
WIRTH, V. & VEZDA, A. 1975. Drei neue Flechtenarten aus Siid-
westafrika. Stuttgarter Beitrdge zur Naturkunde A, 284: 1 —4.
KAPPEN, L. 1982. Lichen oases in hot and cold deserts. Journal of ZAHLBRUCKNER, A. 1932. Lichenes in Africa lecti. Annales de
the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 53: 325 — 330. Cryptogamie Exotique 5: 198—275.
Bothalia 18,1:57-77(1988)
The Cheilanthes hirta complex and allied species (Adiantaceae/Pteri-
daceae) in southern Africa
W. B. G. JACOBSEN* and N. H. G. JACOBSEN**
Keywords: Adiantaceae, Cheilanthes hirta Swartz complex, evolution, key, phytogeography, Pteridaceae, southern Africa, spore morphology
ABSTRACT
The very variable complex of plants until now ascribed to Cheilanthes hirta Swartz, together with some derived or
allied species, is investigated. The type of the species as established by N. C. Anthony (1984), is accepted. Three new
varieties are distinguished: Cheilanthes hirta Swartz var. brevipilosa W. & N. Jacobsen, var. inferacampestris W. & N.
Jacobsen and var. nemorosa W. & N. Jacobsen. One new form of Cheilanthes hirta var. brevipilosa W. & N. Jacobsen is
recognized: forma waterbergensis W. & N. Jacobsen. Var. laxa Kunze (1836) is given the new status of forma: Chei-
lanthes hirta var. brevipilosa W. & N. Jacobsen forma laxa (Kunze) W. & N. Jacobsen. Three allied species are discussed
and included in the key to all taxa mentioned. Taxa are described and information given includes notes on distribution and
ecology. Special attention is paid to spore morphology. Most taxa are illustrated by a habit photo, and all by line drawings
and scanning electron micrographs (SEM) of the spores. Possible evolutionary conclusions, particularly on the nature of the
spores and on frond dimensions in relation to geographical distribution and climate are discussed.
UITTREKSEL
Die hoogs varierende plantkompleks wat tot nou toe by Cheilanthes hirta Swartz ingesluit is, tesame met sommige
afgeleide of verwante spesies, word ondersoek. Die tipe van die spesie soos deur N. C. Anthony vasgestel, word aanvaar.
Drie nuwe varieteite word onderskei: Cheilanthes hirta Swartz var. brevipilosa W. & N. Jacobsen, var. inferacampestris
W. & N. Jacobsen en var. nemorosa W. & N. Jacobsen, lien nuwe vorm van Cheilanthes hirta var. brevipilosa W. & N.
Jacobsen word erken: forma waterbergensis W. & N. Jacobsen. Var. laxa Kunze (1836) word hier die nuwe status van
forma gegee: Cheilanthes hirta var. brevipilosa W. & N. Jacobsen forma laxa (Kunze) W. & N. Jacobsen. Drie verwante
spesies word bespreek en by die sleutel tot alle genoemde taksons ingesluit. Taksons word beskryf en inligting wat verskaf
word, sluit aantekeninge oor verspreiding en ekologie in. Spesiale aandag word aan spoormorfologie gegee. Die meeste
taksons word ge'illustreer met ’n foto van die groeiwyse, en almal met lyntekeninge en aftaselektronmikrogawe (SEM) van
die spore. Moontlike evolusionere gevolgtrekkings, veral oor die aard van die spore en oor blaarafmetings met betrekking
tot geografiese verspreiding en klimaat, word bespreek.
CONTENTS
Introduction and aims 57
History and synonymy 58
Material and methods 59
Results 59
Key to taxa 60
Description of taxa 60
1. C.contracta 60
2. C. hirta var. hirta 61
3. C. hirta v ar. brevipilosa 64
4. C. hirta var. brevipilosa forma laxa 65
5. C. hirta var. brevipilosa forma waterberg-
ensis 68
6. C. hirta var. nemorosa 69
7. C. hirta var. inferacampestris 71
8. C. hyaloglandulosa 72
9. C. nielsii 72
Discussion
Spores and possible evolution 73
Morphology, phytogeography and climate 74
Acknowledgements 76
* P.O. Box 1178, White River 1240.
** Nature Conservation Division, Private Bag X 209, Pretoria 0001 .
MS. received: 1986.04.07.
References 76
Specimens examined 77
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS
Amongs the 24 currently accepted species of Chei-
lanthes Swartz (Anthony 1984) in southern Africa, the
widespread C. hirta Swartz contains in its broader con-
cept a number of rather different looking plants. In this
respect it resembles the equally widespread C. viridis
(Forssk.) Swartz complex which has been split into a
number of varieties or separate species (Anthony 1984).
This has so far not been done in the case of C. hirta.
Since the first naming of the species by Swartz as Adian-
tum caffrorum in 1801 and its description by him in 1806
as Cheilanthes hirta, it has been referred to under a
number of different specific epithets in different genera
and with varying breadth of concept until as recently as
1983 (Jacobsen) and 1984 (Anthony).
The present paper deals with the varying forms, varie-
ties and allied species which were at one time or another
included in the species concept. The authors realize that,
similar to the C. viridis complex, the various forms of C.
hirta will propagate partly sexually and partly apoga-
mously with the possibility of the more xerophytic ones
being apogamous. Cytological studies might clarify in
what way polyploidy and hybridization affect their evo-
lution. This is at present being done with a number of
cheilanthoid ferns of Europe, the Mediterranean and
58
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
Macaronesia and it has led to the creation of a great
number of hybrids, each with its own name. The authors
are not equipped to do this, but they have made a
thorough examination of morphological features, includ-
ing those of the spores, and they conclude that their
findings warrant separation of the C. hirta complex into
a number of taxa.
HISTORY AND SYNONYMY
The typification of the species presents difficulties. It
could either be based on a collection by Dr Groendal in
Herb. Gastroemi of a plant from Mauritius in the
Riksmuseet, Stockholm, or on a collection by Thunberg
from the Cape of Good Hope in Herb. Thunberg,
Uppsala. Certain entries by Wikstroem on the former
sheet seem to indicate that this is indeed the specimen on
which Swartz (1801: 85) based his Adiantum caffrorum
and on which he himself changed the name to Chei-
lanthes hirta (Swartz 1806: 128, 329). Anthony (1984)
accepts the sheet from Mauritius as the type of the spe-
cies. Figure 1 .
Professor N. Lundqvist of the Cryptogamic Section of
the Riksmuseet (personal correspondence) is of the opi-
nion that Swartz typified both his Adiantum caffrorum
and his Cheilanthes hirta with material from South
Africa and that the sheet from Mauritius is not the type.
He also mentioned that it was not marked thus by Prof.
Schelpe, who quotes it as the type (1969: 72). The sheet
in the Thunberg Herbarium is, according to Lundqvist,
not the type, as Swartz had not seen it. He did not com-
ment on the possible locality of the type sheet. Thus the
question of the whereabouts of the type sheet is not
solved. It appears best, however, to follow Anthony
(1984) and to accept the sheet from Mauritius at least as
the lectotype. The specific epithet hirtum or hirta based
on Swartz’ material was combined by various authors
with various genera, which are now included in Chei-
lanthes.
Kunze recognized the variability of the species in
1836 and distinguished four forms: a contracta, P inter-
media, y laxa and 5 parviloba. The types of these names
were housed in his herbarium in Leipzig and were
destroyed during the last war in air attacks on the city. In
later works, beginning with Pappe & Rawson (1858),
and including those of Sim (1915), Jacobsen (1983) and
b
FIGURE 1.— a, a form of C.
hirta, collected 30.4. 1905 at
Koedoespoort near Pretoria,
Leendertz 622, X 0,5; b,
photostat of the lectotype of
Cheilanthes hirta Swartz in
Herb. Gastroemi, Riksmu-
seet, Stockholm, x 1.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
59
Anthony (1984), the forms of Kunze are referred to as the correct name of the plant is now C. hirta Swartz var.
varieties, a procedure in agreement with Article 35.3 of brevipilosa W. & N. Jacobsen forma laxa (Kunze) W. &
the Code. Anthony (1984) and Roux (1986) have investi- N. Jacobsen. The photostat of an isosyntype of C. hirta
gated the typification of Kunze’s forms. They have Swartz var. laxa Kunze shows six very damaged fronds,
established the following: collected by Drege and now housed at the Museum in
Leiden under Morton 751. The locality is not known.
1 , var. contractu is synonymous with C. contractu The habit of these Plants is similar t0 the 'ectotype above
(Kunze) Mett. , a species on its own; and the Plants are considered to be a good match of it.
2, for var. intermedia, Anthony (1984) selects as lec-
totype a collection by Drege from the Witberg in the
southern Cape, now in B under No. 000414 and deter-
mined by Kunze. A duplicate of this collection is in
SAM. Roux (1986) also studied material from B but he
states that he could not find any material listed by Kunze
in his text and he concludes that the variety is untypified;
3, for var. laxa, Anthony (1984) selects a collection
by Drege from near Bokpoort and Nieuweveld as lecto-
type in B under No. 000413, with a duplicate of this
collection in SAM. Roux notes that the specimen Drege
s.n. (BM) collected near Enon and Bontjes River,
mounted on one sheet with some plants collected by
Cooper can be identified with var. laxa, but they are not
cited by Kunze and cannot be considered as syntypes;
4, var. parviloba is cited by Roux (1986) as synony-
mous with Cheilanthes parviloba Swartz.
The authors of this paper have investigated the dupli-
cates of the lectotypes of var. intermedia and var. laxa in
SAM as well as photostats of a probable syntype of var.
intermedia and of an isosyntype of var. laxa . The lecto-
type of C. hirta var. intermedia is a frond without a
rhizome, with a thick stipe and a contracted, narrowly
linear lamina. Stipe, lamina and vestiture coincide with
what the authors consider to be C. hirta Swartz var. hirta
and they sink var. intermedia under it.
The photostat of a probable syntype of var. intermedia
shows a small whole plant and a large stipe and lamina
on the left and right sides of the sheet respectively, col-
lected by Drege, Ecklon & Zeyher, s. n., s. d. The sheet
is housed at the Museum at Leiden under Morton 750.
The plant on the left is from the Paarl Mountain and the
frond on the right from the Sneeuwbergen. They are
obviously different species, the latter is Cheilanthes con-
tractu (Kunze) Mett. ex Kuhn, the former in habit and
size similar to what the authors describe as C. hirta
Swartz var. brevipilosa W. & N. Jacobsen forma laxa
(Kunze) W. & N. Jacobsen (see below).
The lectotype chosen by Anthony (1984) for C. hirta
var. laxa consists of a rather damaged plant with thin
stipes and rhachises and rather crumpled pinnae as well
as part of a stipe and lamina of similar poor preservation.
When Kunze described the forms of the C. hirta com-
plex he had only material from the southern and eastern
Cape at his disposal. The authors of this paper worked
with much more material, including specimens from the
Transvaal, the Orange Free State, Lesotho, Natal and the
northern Cape Province. On account of shape, character
of stipe and lamina and vestiture, they consider the lecto-
type to represent a form of their var. brevipilosa , so that
Pappe & Rawson (1858: 252) described as Chei-
lanthes glandulosa a plant collected by the missionary R.
Moffat, possibly from a locality near Kuruman. Accord-
ing to their text this appears to be a lax form of C. hirta.
The whereabouts of the type are not known.
Anthony (1984) incorporated C. nielsii Jacobsen
(1983) in her concept of C. hirta as a shade form.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The authors have studied the large collection in the
National Herbarium at Pretoria as well as their own col-
lections. The following features were used to distinguish
taxa: rhizome and basal stipe scales, lamina configura-
tion, length to width ratio of lamina and largest pinna,
vestiture of stipe, rhachis and lamina, angle setting of
pinnae to rhachis, and sculpturing of the spores by means
of electron microscope scanning. The latter was carried
out by the Botanical Research Institute, Pretoria.
RESULTS
The authors have come to the conclusion that the com-
plex of forms should be subdivided, that the obviously
allied and consistently deviating forms without interme-
diates should be considered separate species and that the
remaining forms of C. hirta sensu lato should be split
into a number of forms or varieties.
As an allied species which might have evolved from a
common ancestor, Cheilanthes parviloba (Swartz)
Swartz was considered a separate species by its author,
who had originally named it Adiantum parvilobum in
1800, but transferred it to Cheilanthes in 1806. Though
later included as a variety of C. hirta by Kunze (1836),
Pappe & Rawson (1858) and others up to Christensen's
Index ftlicum (1906), Sim (1915) accepted it again at
species level and this view is supported by the present
authors. Due to its glabrous and viscid lamina surface it
is immediately distinct from all other more or less hirsute
members of the complex. It is therefore not discussed
any further in this study.
The general essential features of all forms of the com-
plex are set out by Jacobsen (1983: 261-263) and by
Anthony (1984: 68-69). An important diagnostic fea-
ture is the presence of patent or adpressed multicellular,
often gland-tipped hairs on stipe, rhachis and lamina
surfaces. As gradations occur between a number of the
taxa, separation at species level has been possible only in
a few instances. Three of the hirsute members are sepa-
rated at specific level, and four at varietal level. One of
the varieties is split into two formae. The main differ-
ences are shown in the following key.
60
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
KEY TO THE TAX A
la Fronds 2-pinnatifid to 2-pinnate, sometimes 3-pinnatifid at the extreme base, elliptic, not exceeding 175 mm in
length, frail; rhizome very short, erect, almost like that of an annual herb 9. C. nielsii
lb Fronds 3-4-pinnatifid:
2a Lamina densely covered with translucent, hyaline glands 8. C. hyaloglandulosa
2b Lamina mainly hirsute, hyaline glands occasionally present;
3a Hairs on stipe and rhachis twisted and adpressed; fronds mostly strongly contracted, lamina on long stout
stipes 1. C.contracta
3b Hairs on stipe and rhachis mainly patent:
4a Setting of pinnae to rhachis mainly at 45°-57°, pinnae crowded towards apex, pinnules more or less
inrolled, hairs on upper surface of lamina long, thin, sparse, undersurface with sparse hairs along
costae and costules only 2. C. hirta var. hirta
4b Setting of pinnae to rhachis mainly at more than 50°:
5a Hairs on lamina short, thick, often glandular, varying in length:
6a Hairs very short, glassy, occasionally glandular on upper side of lamina, very sparse, short, gland-
tipped hairs on undersurface; fronds narrowly lanceolate to linear, often contracted, with pinnules
strongly inrolled 3. C. hirta var. brevipilosa
6b More densely hirsute on both surfaces; fronds lanceolate, not contracted, pinnae spreading; plants
small; stipe thin, fragile, reddish to purplish;
7a Hairs on rhachis 1,0— 1,8 mm long, dense, mainly gland-tipped, 4-5-celled
4. C. hirta var. brevipilosa forma laxa
7b Hairs on rhachis mostly thin and fine, clear, hyaline, 0,4- 1 ,4 mm long, mostly 2-3-celled, with
characteristic pyramidal basal cell 5. C. hirta var. brevipilosa forma waterbergensis
5b Hairs on lamina long, thin, flexuous, only occasionally with a small glandular tip:
8a Fronds finely divided, up to 4-pinnatifid, ovate-lanceolate, broadest below the middle of the lamina;
hairs on rhachis 1-2 mm long, fine and twisted, 5-6-celled 6. C. hirta var. nemorosa
8b Fronds lax, 3-pinnatifid, lanceolate, broadest in middle of the lamina; hairs on rhachis 1,5 -2, 8 mm
long, very dense in basal part, 6— 8( 15)-celled 7. C. hirta var. inferacampestris
DESCRIPTION OF TAX A
1. Cheilanthes contracta {Kunze) Mett. ex Kuhn ,
Filices Africanae: 70 (1868); N. C. Anthony 11: 60, t.
12, fig. 14 A'-D' (1984). Type: Cape Province, Zwart-
kops River, Drege (LZ, syn.t; BM lecto.; K, L-BOL
photo.; S, SAM). Figures 2b, 3, 4a— c.
Cheilanthes hirta var. contracta Kunze 10: 539 (1836); Pappe &
Rawson: 35 ( 1858); Sim: 85 ( 1892); Sim: 229, t. Ill, fig. 1(1915),
pro parte. Myriopteris contracta (Kunze) Fee: 149 ( 1852).
Cheilanthes hirta var. contracta sensu Sim in Jacobsen: 262 (1983),
pro parte.
The species (Figures 2b, 3) has recently been
described by Anthony (1984) so that only a few pertinent
morphological features need be stressed here, which dis-
tinguish the species from all other taxa of the complex:
the long creeping rhizome; the rhizome scales which are
darker than those of other members of the complex; the
dark green coloration of the ventral surface of the lamina
(only common with C. hirta var. hirta) and especially
the twisted 3 — 4( — 6)-cellular hairs on stipe, rhachis and
lamina surfaces, adpressed downwards along the rhachis
(Figure 3c). The pinnae are mostly 12-15 mm apart,
9-28 x 2,5—10 mm, with up to 10 pinnules, spreading
at an angle of 38°-52° (average 46°) from the rhachis, bu
curving upwards to run parallel or even towards it and
touching the pinnae above (Figure 2 b). The pinnules
may be very close together or more often well separated
and alternate on the costae, about 4x2 mm where
measurable, but often too contracted, especially when
mature or drying out; the sori are dark brown, about 0,5
mm in diameter. The spores are globular, about 50 gm
in diameter, rugulose with anastomosing rugae and a
prominent trilete ridge (Figure 4a— c).
Vouchers: Acocks 19081 (PRE); Esterhuysen 25808 (PRE); Lieben-
berg 7253 (PRE); Lomw 2 (PRE); Taylor 5915 (PRE).
Distribution
The species is essentially southern, but has recently
been found to occur in the eastern Transvaal, where it
overlaps in its distribution with that of C. hirta var. hirta
and of var. brevipilosa. In the Cape Province it extends
from the Kamiesberg in Namaqualand along the Cape
mountain ranges to the south-western, southern and
south-eastern parts of the province, approximately as far
as the Grahamstown area. Northwards it is found as far
as the Swartberg. The species is quite frequent in the
Cape, but rare in the Transvaal (Figure 5).
Ecology
C. contracta usually grows in shallow, sandy lithosols
amongst rocks or even on sheetrock mats. Quartzite soils
seem to be preferred. Aspect is of no importance, but
plants at the foot of large boulders in half or part shade
tend to be larger. In arid fynbos the stipe may be quite
long, frequently as long as the lamina. In spite of the
creeping rhizome the fronds are mostly only ± 3 mm
apart, the stipes irregularly sprouting, young ones indis-
criminately mixed with mature ones, so that large clus-
ters of fronds develop.
The altitudinal range is large, according to Anthony (/.
c.) between 60 and 1 830 m in the Cape, but apparently
not below 1 000 m in the Transvaal. An herbarium sheet
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
61
FIGURE 2. — a, Cheilanthes hirta Swartz var. hirta.
Transvaal, 2530 (Lydenburg): on Old Kruger
Road at Waterval Onder, amongst grass and
herbs in sunlight (-CA), 13.1. 1978, Jacobsen
4907, x 0,7; b, Cheilanihes contracta (Kunze)
Mett. ex Kuhn. Cape, 3323 (Willowmore):
west end of Baviaanskloof, (-BD), Jacobsen
5181 , x 0,7.
from near Sabie bears the remark 'xerophytic on quartz-
ite ridge’. This refers probably to the Pretoria Series
quartzite. The other known Transvaal record is from
Kaapsche Hoop, which lies well above 1 000 m. Condi-
tions in the Cape are mostly fairly arid, the annual rain-
fall varying between 200 and 800 mm. The Transvaal
localities, which fall in the summer rainfall area, receive
more than 1 000 mm per year.
FIGURE 3. — Cheilanthes contracta (Kunze) Mett. ex Kuhn. Cape,
3321 (Ladismith): Sevenweekspoort ( — AD), Jacobsen 5177. a,
outline of frond, X 0,6; b, pinnule, x 8; c, portion of rhachis
(characteristic: the basiscopically adpressed long, multicellular
hairs), X 32; d, rhizome scale, x 48; e & f, stipe and rhachis hairs
respectively, x 280.
2. Cheilanthes hirta Swartz var. hirta. Chei-
lanthes hirta Swartz: 128, 329 (1806). Type: Mauritius,
Groendal (S, lecto.-Herb. Jacobsen, photo.!). Figures
2a, 4d-f, 6,7.
Adiantum hirtum (Swartz) Poir. in Lam.: 142 (1810). Notholaena
hirta (Swartz) J. Sm.: 50 (1841). Myriopteris hirta (Swartz) J. Sm.:
174(1866).
Notholaena capensis Sprengel: 32 (1828). Type: Cape Province.
Uitenhage, Zeyher 275 (B, iso.).
Cheilanthes hirta var. intermedia Kunze 10: 539 (1836); Roux: 370
(1986). C. hirta var. intermedia (Kunze) Pappe & Rawson: 35 (1858);
Anthony 11: 69(1984). (No type indicated; see discussion of lectotype
under History and synonymy above).
Cheilanthes hirta var. contracta sensu Sim: 229, t. Ill, figs 1 & 1
beta (1915), pro parte; Tardieu 1: 137, t. 19, figs 1-3 (1958); Jacob-
sen: 262, pro parte, fig. 66 ( 1983).
leones: Tardieu-Blot: t. 19 ( 1958); Jacobsen: 101, fig. 66 ( 1983).
The lectotype is a rather contracted plant, of which
only the upper part is preserved, not dissimilar to certain
specimens from South Africa (Figure la, b). The conclu-
sion that the South African populations agree with the
lectotype is based on investigation of a photo of the type
sheet and on the following observations: what is here
considered to be var. hirta is, apart from var. inferacam-
pestris, the only eastern representative of the complex,
reaching the coast of South Africa in Transkei (Figure
7). Tardieu-Blot (1958) describes under Cheilanthes
hirta Swartz var. contracta Kunze a plant with con-
62
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
FIGURE 4. — Cwilanthes contracta (Kunze) Mett. ex Kuhn, Jacobsen 5181: a, several spores, X 380; b, single
spore, distal face, x 1160; c, single spore, proximal face, X 1040. Cheilanthes hirta Swartz var. hirla,
Jacobsen 4907: d, single spore, side view, x 930; e, single spore, distal face, X 730; f, single spore, proximal
face, x 730. Cheilanthes hirla Swartz var. brevipilosa W. & N. Jacobsen: g, N. Jacobsen 4522 , single spore,
proximal face, x 1200; h, Jacobsen 5267, single spore, distal face, x 870.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
63
FIGURE 6. — Cheilanthes hirtu Swartz var. hirta. Transvaal, 2530
Lydenburg (— CB), Jacobsen 4907. a, outline of frond, x 0,3; b,
portion of rhachis with right pinna, x 2; c, portion of rhachis, x
5; d, scale at base of stipe, x 12; e, hair of stipe, x 35; f, hair of
centre of rhachis, x 35; g, hair of underside of pinnule, x 46; h,
hair of upper surface, x 73.
traded, elongate fronds, with long, white, patent hairs
and with globular trilete spores with convex faces and
cristate-reticulate sporoderm. The senior author saw a
contracted, elongate plant with long white hairs on the
surfaces which he identified as a form of Cheilanthes
hirta on Reunion in 1978. No other forms of the variable
species are recorded from these localities. It is accepted
therefore that the variety described here agrees with the
Mauritian plant.
Rhizome creeping or shortly ascending with narrowly
linear, subulate, flexuous scales, reddish brown with
median dark stripe in the lower part, where they are 3-5
x 0,2-0, 5 mm, uniformly reddish brown higher up,
8-11 x 0,5 mm. Fronds erect, tufted or closely spaced.
FIGURE 7. — Distribution of Cheilanthes hirta var. hirta.
slightly contracted to densely crumpled, pinnae slightly
to tightly inrolled and twisted out of the plane of the
frond. Stipe terete, stout, reddish brown to very dark
brown, dull or shiny, 1—2 mm in diameter, basal scales
6-13 mm long, linear to narrowly lanceolate (Figure
6d), crowded at base, diminishing in frequency upwards
and absent from about 2/3 of the length of the stipe, be-
coming gradually replaced by grey to reddish patent
hairs, 2,0— 2,5 mm long (Figure 6e), protruding from a
coat of de flexed or patent shorter hairs. Lamina very
narrowly lanceolate (Figures 2a, 6a), 90-410 x 5-55
mm, averaging 200 x 24 mm, 2 to 3-pinnate; apex
rounded to acute with pinnatifid terminal segment. Pin-
nae triangular with 6 to 7 pairs of pinnules, lowest of
these often strongly basiscopically developed, pinnate to
bipinnatifid at base, set at an average angle of 40°— 57°
(rarely up to 79°) to the rhachis, and then strongly bent
upwards; 2 to 5 pairs of pinnae reduced towards base,
lowest one 3-8 mm long, 15-28 mm distant from near-
est above; centre pinnae (9—) 12—42 x (3—) 7—12 mm,
averaging 23 x 9 mm, 7-15 mm distant from each
other; top pinnae crowded or up to 8 mm distant from the
terminal segment; costae and larger costules winged.
Pinnules triangular to oblong, lobed, not hairy at the
margin, but with sparse, long, thin, simple or Finely
gland-tipped, 3-5-celled hairs 0,75—1,5 mm long on
upper surface and along the costules on the undersurface
(Figure 6g, h), elsewhere practically glabrous. Rhachis
round, shiny or dull greyish to reddish brown, casta-
neous or dark brown, generally shaggy with patent red-
dish, occasionally gland-tipped 3-7-celled hairs (Figure
60- Sporangia mostly barely visible under the inrolled
lobes of the pinnules. Spores averaging 64 g, m in dia-
meter [Std Dev. (standard deviation) ± 2,71], rounded
though faintly triangular in outline with convex faces,
trilete ridge not or weakly developed, reticulate-cristate,
occasionally rugulose-cristate on a smoothly granulose
base (Figure 4d- f).
Vouchers: Fourie U7>21 (PRE); Jacobsen 4521 (PRE); Lambrechts
45 (PRE); Leendertz 4047 (PRE); Theron 2469 (PRE).
Distribution
Apart from the type locality in Mauritius, the presence
of the variety has been confirmed in Reunion, in Mada-
gascar, Zimbabwe and southern Africa. Here it is known
from the Transvaal Highveld, northern and western
64
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
Transvaal, Swaziland, the Orange Free State, Lesotho,
Natal, Transkei and the eastern and southern Cape, with
one occurrence as far west as the Somerset West area
(Figure 7). The variety is frequent in the Transvaal,
Natal, Transkei and the eastern Cape, rare in the OFS,
Upper Karoo and southern Cape.
Ecology
The variety grows mostly in shallow sandy to loamy
lithosols in rocky ground, amongst boulders and out-
crops, often at the foot of boulders or cliffs, usually
amongst some herbs and grass, but also in open bush
country in sunlight or preferably in part shade. The alti-
tude ranges from almost sea level in Natal, Transkei and
the Cape to more than 2 000 m (almost 3 000 m in Leso-
tho in a deviating, dwarf, highly contracted form) at 400
to 1 000 mm annual rainfall, however, in the wetter
areas not in forests, but always in open well drained
positions. In the winter rainfall area of the Cape the
plants dry and shrivel during the hot summer months,
while on higher ground in the Free State, Lesotho and
Transvaal they fade during the winter to develop new
shoots at the onset of the summer rains. They may be
evergreen, but are not soriferous during the winter in the
coastal areas of higher rainfall.
Notes
It had initially been thought, that the fronds of C. hirta
var. hirta were always highly contracted, corresponding
to Kunze’s (1836) var. contracta, but detailed investiga-
tions have shown that the essential differences between
the taxa of the complex lie in the type of vestiture of
rhachis and lamina and the spore characters. Contracted
habit as well as more spread out fronds may occur in C.
contracta, C. hirta var. hirta and var. brevipilosa. All
three are well separated by the nature of the rhachis and
surface hairs as well as by differences in the nature and
size of the spores.
3. Cheilanthes hirta Swartz var. brevipilosa W. &
N. Jacobsen, var. nova. Type: Transvaal, Mondeor,
Johannesburg Jacobsen 5254 (PRE, holo.; Herb. Jacob-
sen, iso.) Figures 4g, h; 8 & 9.
A varietatibus et formis ceteris speciei pilis brevissi-
mis glandulosis in superficiebus ambabus laminae dif-
fert.
Rhizome creeping with broadly based lanceolate, acu-
minate, light brown to reddish scales, 5-9 x 0,5- 1,2
mm, basal ones shorter with black median stripe. Fronds
erect, tufted, closely spaced. Stipe terete, dark brown,
dull or shiny, 1, 2-2,0 mm in diameter, stout, basal
scales as those on rhizome, acuminate to linear, 5— 10 x
O, 4-0, 8 mm, becoming less and smaller upwards and
replaced about half way up by patent, twisted or shaggy
light brown or reddish hairs up to 1 mm long protruding
from a shaggy coat of shorter hairs. Lamina linear-lan-
ceolate to lanceolate, often broadest above the middle
(Figure 9a), 3-pinnatifid to 3-pinnate, slightly contracted
to densely crumpled (Figure 8) with the pinnae flat or
inrolled and twisted out of the plane of the frond; apex
rounded or subacute with a tiny pinnatifid terminal seg-
ment 2-5 mm long. Pinnae mostly spreading at 63°-79°
from the rhachis, but often at more acute angles, es-
pecially in contracted forms, otherwise pinnae and pin-
nules as in var. hirta, except for very short, glassy, occa-
FIGURE 8. — Cheilanthes hirta Swartz var. brevipilosa W. & N.
Jacobsen. Transvaal, 2527 (Rustenburg): Rustenburg Nature
Reserve, on rocky ground, in full sunlight, 1 460 m (-CC),
Jacobsen 4522. This is an extremely contracted form as the
variety is usually more open in habit than C. hirta var. hirta, X 1 .
sionally glandular hairs, arranged flabelliform along the
costules of the pinnules on the upper side (Figure 90,
and very sparse, short, gland-tipped hairs on the under-
side which may be almost glabrous. Rhachis densely
covered by short and adpressed, 1 — 3-celled gland-
tipped hairs 0,2-0, 5 mm long, with occasional patent
longer hairs of this type, up to 5-celled and 1 ,8 mm long
(Figure 9d, e). Spores averaging 48 /xm in diameter (Std
Dev. ± 1,34), strictly triangular, trilete ridge prominent,
essentially strongly and coarsely rugulose-cristate,
especially on distal face, but with isolated short rugae
and rare verrucae on proximal face (Figure 4g, h).
Vouchers: Jacobsen 5069 (PRE); Reid 462 (PRE); Repton 5335
(PRE); Thode A7877 (PRE); Westfall 905 (PRE).
Distribution
Known so far from South Africa and SWA/Namibia.
In the former mainly in a strip trending north-south from
the northern, eastern and western Transvaal through the
Orange Free State and western Lesotho to the eastern
Cape, with an isolated outlier in the northern Cape Pro-
vince south of Vryburg and three north-south orientated
occurrences in southern SWA/Namibia (Figure 10). A
find allotted to this variety in the Natal Drakensberg is
doubtful and may be a hybrid of var. hirta and var.
nemorosa (Jacobsen 4628). The variety overlaps in its
distribution to a large extent with that of var. hirta, but
seems to be absent from Natal and the Transkei.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
65
FIGURE 9. — Cheilanthes hirta
Swartz var. brevipilosa W. &
N. Jacobsen. Transvaal 2627
(Potchefstroom): Mondeor,
Johannesburg (-BB), Jacobsen
5267: a, outline of frond, X 0,6;
b, portion of rhachis with right
pinna, X 4; c, portion of rha-
chis, x 15; d, short glandular
hair of rhachis, x 123; e, multi-
cellular hair of rhachis, X 123;
f, (same locality, but Jacobsen
5254) terminal segment of pinna
with characteristic very short
glandular hairs in fan-like orien-
tation, x 23.
Ecology
Ecologically its requirements are similar to those of
var. hirta. The altitudinal range also tends to be alike,
probably from about 100-2 000 m. Highly alpine forms
are missing. On the whole the variety prefers more xero-
phytic localities, yet has a broad moisture tolerance
range, and occurs in both summer and winter rainfall
areas with an annual precipitation ranging from as low as
100 mm to about 1 000 mm. It is common in the
Transvaal and frequent in the OFS, but becomes rarer in
the eastern Cape Province except for the Hogsback-Keis-
kamma area.
Notes
The variety is distinguished by its smaller, triangular
spores from var. hirta , which has large, rounded spores.
The original concept of a taxonomic separation on
account of the generally more open and spreading lamina
in var. brevipilosa could not be upheld, as some fairly
contracted forms with triangular spores (N. Jacobsen
4522, Figure 8) were seen. A subsequent study disclosed
the different type of vestiture, which forms a most
important additional criterion for differentiation and
which was used in the key to the taxa of the complex.
4. Cheilanthes hirta Swartz var. brevipilosa W. N.
Jacobsen forma laxa ( Kunze ) W. & N. Jacobsen, stat.
nov. Type: near Bokpoort and Nieuweveld, Drege s. n.
(B, lecto; SAM!; BOL, photo.). Figures 11a, 12 &
13a-c.
Cheilanthes hirta Swartz var. laxa Kunze in Linnaea 10: 540 ( 1836).
?Cheilanthes glandulosa Pappe & Rawson: 35 (1858). Type: ?Cape,
nr Kuruman, Moffat s. n. (not found).
leones: Anthony: t. 14A, B (1984).
Rhizome erect, small, with closely tufted fronds with
scales lanceolate, acute, 4-5 x 0,6— 0,8 mm, lower
ones light brown with dark median stripe, upper ones
light brown to foxy red, broader and larger. Stipe terete,
reddish brown, more rarely dark brown to almost black,
thin, reaching only rarely 1 mm in diameter, basal scales
lanceolate-acuminate, 4 x 0,6 mm, pale brown to
brown, replaced higher up by patent, occasionally gland-
tipped, light brown hairs up to 2 mm long. Lamina lan-
ceolate to oblong (Figures 11a, 12a), broadest in the
middle, 3-pinnatifid to 3-pinnate, 60-250 x 15-50
mm, averaging 140 x 32 mm, about 4/ times longer
than broad, apex rounded, pinnatifid, terminal segment
7-8 mm long. Pinnae triangular, mostly with 3-4 pairs
of pinnules, spreading at 70°— 90° from the rhachis, 0-3
pairs slightly reduced towards base, lowest 8-15 x
6-10 mm, 13-27 mm distant from next above; centre
pinnae 8-32 x 5—14 mm, 7—15 mm apart, apex
rounded, slightly basiscopically developed at the base
(Figure 12b); top pinnae crowded or up to 5 mm distant
from terminal segment. Pinnules oblong, lobed to pinna-
tifid, apex obtuse, terminal segment unequally pinnati-
fid, decurrent, some simple or gland-tipped hairs on the
66
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
FIGURE 11. — a, Cheilanthes hirta
Swartz var. brevipilosa W. &
N. Jacobsen forma laxa (Kunze)
W. & N. Jacobsen. Cape, 3224
(Graaff-Reinet): Karoo Nature
Reserve, under shrubs in shade
amongst pillars of dolorite
( — BB), Jacobsen 5185, X 0,6;
b, Cheilanthes hirta Swartz var.
brevipilosa W. & N. Jacobsen
forma waterbergensis W. & N.
Jacobsen. Transvaal, 2328 (Bal-
timore): farm Ketting 368 LR,
on south-facing slope, in cre-
vices of sandstone cliff, 1 085
m (-BD), Jacobsen 5121
(holotype), x 0,6.
upper side (Figure 1 20, fairly thick, simple or gland-
tipped 3-5-celled hairs on margins and underside (Fig-
ure 12e, g). Rachis and costae round, dull or shiny, red
to reddish brown with a dense coat of often gland-tipped,
patent, red, (2) 4-5 (lO)-celled hairs, 1-2 mm long
(Figures 12c, h). Sporangia discrete, marginal, under
the lobes of the pinnules. Spores about 46 /u,m in diame-
ter (Std Dev. ± 1,10), triangular in outline with a faintly
prominent trilete ridge, reticulate-cristate, the trilete
ridge formed by reticulating cristae (Figure 13a-c).
Vouchers: Allardice 1504 (PRE); Giffen FH 1838 (PRE); Henrici
3966 (PRE); Jacobsen 5 185 (PRE); Oliver & Mueller 6455 (PRE).
Distribution
The form extends from the south-western Transvaal
into the northern Cape Province and south-eastern SWA /
Namibia and southwards in a broad strip through the
central Karoo, the OFS and part of Lesotho to the south-
eastern Cape. A few finds of the form have been made in
central SWA/Namibia (Figure 14).
FIGURE 12. — Cheilanthes hirta Swartz var. brevipilosa W. & N.
Jacobsen forma laxa (Kunze) W. & N. Jacobsen. Cape, 3224
(Graaff-Reinet): Karoo Nature Reserve ( - BB), Jacobsen 5185: a,
outline of frond, x 0,5; b, portion of rhachis with right pinna, X
3; c, portion of rhachis, x 13; d, basal stipe scale with sclerotic
brown centre, X 38; e, glandular hair of undersurface with russet-
coloured interstices, x 102; f, unicellular clear hair of upper
surface, x 222; g, clear hair of undersurface, x 102; h, rhachis
hair, x 102.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
67
FIGURE 13. — Cheilanthes hirta Swartz var. brevipilosa W. & N. Jacobsen forma laxa (Kunze) W. & N. Jacobsen,
Allardice 1504 : a, several spores, X 380; b, single spore, distal face, x 1040; c, single spore, proximal face, x
1040. Cheilanthes hirta Swartz var. brevipilosa W. & N. Jacobsen forma waterbergensis W. & N. Jacobsen,
Jacobsen 5137: d, several spores, x 380; e, single spore, distal face, x 1050; f, single spore, proximal face, x
1050. Cheilanthes hyaloglandulosa W. & N. Jacobsen, N. Jacobsen 5255: g, single spore, proximal face, x 925;
h, single spore, distal face, x 880.
68
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
FIGURE 14. — Distribution of Cheilanthes hirta var. brevipitosa for-
mae laxa, • ; and waterbergensis, 4 .
Ecology
It is a xerophytic representative of the C. hirta com-
plex, growing mostly on stony slopes or amongst boul-
ders or in rock crevices (very often of dolerite) under
fairly arid conditions, never on north aspects, rarely on
west-facing slopes, but frequently on east and south
aspects. It shelters usually under boulders or overhang-
ing krantzes or, if sufficient scrubby vegetation is avail-
able, as for instance in the Karoo Nature Reserve at
Graaff-Reinet or in the south-eastern Cape, under
shrubs, sometimes belonging to the genus Euphorbia.
The habit of the plants is therefore not xeromorphic, but
mesomorphic, with a small rhizome and frail stipes and
rhachis.
The altitudinal range extends from practically sea
level in the south-eastern Cape to about 2 000 m in west-
ern Lesotho in areas with the rainfall ranging from 200 to
± 1 000 mm annually. Phenologically it follows the
pattern of C. hirta var. hirta and var. brevipilosa. It is
occasional to rare and mostly isolated.
Notes
C. hirta var. brevipilosa forma laxa probably corre-
sponds with C. glandulosa of Pappe & Rawson (1858),
the type of which was collected in Griqualand in 1857 by
Moffat, but is now lost. According to the description it
had purple stipes and rhachises with glandular hairs.
Pappe & Rawson (1858: 36) remark that this species was
‘very like C. hirta var. laxa of Kunze (1836)’, which is
obviously a lax variety of the species. It appears there-
fore that Baker, cited in Anthony: 70 (1984), erred in
comparing a contracted form with the type specimen of
C. glandulosa in Herb. Rawson.
C. hirta var. brevipilosa forma laxa differs from all
other taxa of the complex, except C. hirta var. brevipi-
losa forma waterbergensis and C. nielsii, in the smaller
size and fragile stipe. It differs from C. hirta var. brevi-
pilosa forma waterbergensis in the 1-2 mm long hairs on
the rhachis which are without long basal pyramidal cells,
and from C. nielsii in the tripinnate fronds.
5. Cheilanthes hirta Swartz var. brevipilosa VP. &
N. Jacobsen forma waterbergensis VP. & N. Jacobsen,
forma nova. Type: north-western Transvaal, farm Ret-
ting 368 LR, N. Jacobsen 5121 (PRE, holo.), Figures
lib, 13d— f& 15.
A taxis affinibus praeter C. hirtam var. brevipilosam
forma laxam et C. nielsii, statura parva et stipite gracili
differt. A C. hirta var. brevipilosa forma laxa cellulis
basalibus pyramidalibus pilorum longiorum rhachidis et
a C. nielsii fronde tripinnata differt.
All morphological features coincide with those of C.
hirta var. brevipilosa forma laxa, but pinnae mostly with
5 pairs of pinnules. Pinnules triangular to oblong, deeply
lobed, terminal segment lobed, apex rounded, margins
not hairy (Figure 15b), but hirsute on both surfaces with
short 1— 3-celled, gland-tipped hairs (Figures 15f, g).
Rhachis well covered with mostly thin and fine hairs,
often gland-tipped, mostly 2- or 3-celled, but also with
some longer ones with up to 6 cells, with a characteristic
pyramidal long basal cell (Figures 15d, e). Spores about
51 p.m in diameter (Std. Dev. ± 0,57), triangular with
faintly prominent trilete ridge; spore surface forming a
network of irregular rugulose cristae, sparse on proximal
face and on the trilete ridge.
Vouchers: Burn Davy 1670 (PRE); Galpin M 700 (PRE); Jacob-
sen 5137 (PRE); Rodin 4127 ( PRE).
FIGURE 15. — Cheilanthes hirta Swartz var. brevipilosa W. & N.
Jacobsen forma waterbergensis W. & N. Jacobsen. Transvaal,
2328 (Baltimore): Koedoesrand, farm Wemmersvlei 185 LR
( — AC), Jacobsen 5137 : a, outline of frond, x 0,7; b, portion of
rhachis with left pinna, x 3; c, portion of rhachis, X 27; d,
rhachis hair, x 136; e, stipe hair, x 136; f & g, very short hairs of
the lamina surfaces, x 406 (both d & e show the characteristic
pyramidal basal cell of these hairs).
Distribution
This form occurs to the north of the area of forma laxa
in the western and north-western Transvaal with the
northern limit north of the Waterberg. There are isolated
finds from the Loskop Dam and from near Pretoriuskop
in the Kruger National Park (see Figure 14).
Ecology
Forma waterbergensis is a xerophytic form of the drier
areas of the Transvaal, where the annual rainfall does not
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
69
exceed 600 mm. Scarcity of material prevents an assess-
ment of the altitudinal range. It may be between 700 and
1 100 m. Similar to forma laxa, the plants prefer south
aspects, growing in shallow lithosols of sandstones, fel-
site or granite amongst and in shelter of boulders or in
rock crevices. The form is rare and has been collected
only a few times.
Notes
The form was separated from the similar and wide-
spread forma laxa on account of the different nature of
the hairs of the rhachis. It differs from C. hirta var.
brevipilosa in the pyramidal basal cells of the rhachis
hairs; in its small size and in the frail stipe and rhachis,
which are very different from the robust stipe of the
variety. The pinnae spread from the rhachis at almost 90°
while those of var. brevipilosa are always ascending.
6. Cheilanthes hirta Swartz var. nemorosa W. &
N. Jacobsen, var. nova. Type: eastern Transvaal, Mount
Sheba Nature Reserve, Jacobsen 4443 (PRE, holo.;
Herb. Jacobsen, iso.) Figures 16, 17 & 18a-c.
A taxis affinibus aliis, praeter aliquas formas mon-
tanas, statura magna, fronde usque ad quadripinnatifida,
ovato-lanceolata, latissime infra medium et sporis dense
subtiliterque reticulato-cristatis differt.
Rhizome robust, erect, with densely tufted fronds and
with linear, subulate, light brown to reddish brown
scales 5— 9 x 0,2— 0,5 mm. Stipe terete, dark reddish
brown to almost black, dull or shiny, stout, up to 2 mm
in diameter, basal scales lanceolate to very narrowly
linear, acuminate to subulate, 5 — 10 x 0,2— 1,2 mm
(Figure 17d), foxy red to brown, higher up replaced by
U
FIGURE 16. — Cheilanthes hirta Swartz var. nemorosa W. & N.
Jacobsen. Transvaal, 2430 (Pilgrim’s Rest): Mount Sheba Nature
Reserve, on way to Gola Gola Waterfalls, in light scrubby forest,
1 660 m (-DB) Jacobsen 4443 (isotype), x 0,4.
FIGURE 17. — Cheilanthes hirta Swartz var. nemorosa W. & N.
Jacobsen. 2730 (Vryheid): Kwamadhlangampisi Mountain, near
Dirkiesdorp, Transvaal ( — AB), Jacobsen 5113: a, outline of
lamina, X 0,2; b, portion of rhachis with right pinna, X 3; c,
portion of rhachis, X 10; d, scale at base of stipe, x 38; e, rhachis
hair, X 85.
patent, occasionally gland-tipped light brown to fox-red
hairs up to 2 mm long. Lamina ovate-lanceolate to nar-
rowly lanceolate, broadest below the middle (Figures 16,
17a), long tapering towards the apex, 3-pinnate to 4-pin-
natifid, finely divided, apex rounded to acute with a
minute terminal segment 3-5 mm long, base tapering
with 1-4 pairs of pinnae reduced. Pinnae triangular to
oblong, spreading at 61 °— 80° from the rhachis, in large
specimens the lowest 20—28 x 5-20 mm, 35-44 mm
distant from next above, largest below middle of frond
40-95 x 14—25 mm, 19—23 mm from each other,
uppermost pinnae 1—3 mm from the terminal segment.
Pinnules in (4)5-9 pairs, oblong, deeply pinnatifid to
pinnate to a winged costule, upper ones, elliptic, slightly
lobed (especially in the high altitude forms), lobes
oblong-cuneate or rounded, apex obtuse (Figure 17b),
terminal segment pinnatifid with apex rounded, margins
and both surfaces with long, 4— 5-celled non-glandular
hairs. Rhachis round, shiny below, matt above, casta-
neous to dark brown with mostly non-glandular, 5 or
6(9)-celled, usually with fine and twisted hairs up to 2
mm long (Figure 17c, e). Spores on average 53 gm in
diameter (Std Dev. ± 2,29), globular to faintly triangu-
lar in outline, trilete ridge not or only very faintly
developed, loosely to densely and finely reticulate-
cristate, rarely cristate-rugulose (Figure 18a-c).
Vouchers: Buitendag 1246 (PRE); Compton 30444 (PRE); Jacobsen
51 13 (PRE); Strey 6167 (PRE), Wager 4595 (PRE).
Distribution
The variety is confined to the high rainfall areas of
South Africa, following essentially the eastern escarp-
ment and the mountains of the southern Cape. The distri-
bution is somewhat patchy with isolated areas along the
Soutpansberg-Woodbush escarpment, a long strip from
The Downs in eastern Transvaal through Swaziland to
the Louwsburg area and some isolated occurrences in the
Witbank-Belfast and Ermelo areas. After a gap in the
70
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
FIGURE 18. — Cheilanthes hirta Swartz var. nemorosa W. & N. Jacobsen, Jacobsen 4443: a, several spores, X
380; b, single spore, distal face, x 890; c, single spore, proximal face, x 840. Cheilanthes hirta Swartz var.
inferacampestris W. & N. Jacobsen, V. d. Schijff 3990: d, single spore, proximal face, X 1 100; e, single spore,
distal face, x 1 100. Cheilanthes nielsii Jacobsen, Jacobsen 5125: f, several spores, X 380; g, single spore,
proximal face, x 1500; h, single spore, distal face, x 1500.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
71
FIGURE 19. — Distribution of Cheilanthes hirta var. nemorosa.
Natal Midlands it is found again all along the OFS/Leso-
tho border, along the Drakensberg and into southern
Natal and Transkei, ending in the Hogsback area of the
eastern Cape. The southern Cape area extends from the
Suurberg to the Grootvadersbos (Figure 19).
Ecology
The variety grows as a hemicryptophyte in shallow
lateritic, humiferous soils of fersiallitic to ferallitic
nature, mostly amongst boulders on mountain slopes or
in gullies and ravines, as long as there is a certain
amount of shade. It does not enter the wet forest of its
environment, but prefers forest edges and scrub forest in
areas of 800 to more than 1 200 mm annual rainfall. It
was thought not to occur at greater altitudes than about
1 800 m, but a dwarf, typical montane form occupies
elevations from 1 800 to about 2 300 m in the Witzie-
shoek-Sentinel area, either on scree slopes in the shelter
of ericoid scrub or sometimes in company with Polysti-
chum alticola Schelpe & N. C. Anthony or chasmophy-
tic on basalt cliffs, again with P. alticola or Cheilanthes
eckloniana (Kunze) Mett. These plants are usually be-
tween 150 and 200 mm, rarely up to 300 mm tall and
about 50 mm broad.
Note
C. hirta var. nemorosa is morphologically an easily
recognized type and its spores are rather different from
the other members of the C. hirta complex. This might
have justified specific rank, but some intermediates be-
tween it and var. brevipilosa or var. inferacampestris
respectively were seen, so that varietal status is prefer-
able.
7. Cheilanthes hirta Swartz var. inferacampestris
VF. & N. Jacobsen, var. nov. Type: Transvaal, Kruger
National Park, V. d. Schijff 3990 (PRE, holo.). Figures
18d, e; 20 & 21.
A varietate typica pinnis patentibus laxis differt; a
taxis ceteris complexi pilis longioribus laminae differt.
Rhizome black, robust, erect, with closely tufted
fronds; scales practically absent except for a few very
small, almost black scales low on the rhizome. Stipe
terete, 1 mm in diameter, dark brown, dull, firm; basal
scales 5 x 0,6 mm, lanceolate, light brown, replaced
upwards by patent light brown hairs up to 2 mm long
(Figure 21d). Lamina slender, not contracted, delicately
3-pinnatifid to 3-pinnate, lanceolate to narrowly oblong,
broadest in the middle (Figures 20, 21a), 180-360 x
30-70 mm, apex acute with a small terminal segment,
base with only a few pairs of pinnae slightly reduced.
Pinnae spreading at 60°-78° from the rhachis, lowest 28
mm long, 35 mm distant from next above, largest
coarsely serrate to bi-pinnatifid, 30-33 x 20-23 mm,
18 mm apart, triangular, subacute to obtuse (Figure
21b), upper ones crowded, about 4 mm distant from the
terminal segment, which is pinnatifid or lobed. Pinnules
elliptic in outline, apex lobed, margins and surfaces with
scattered, straight, long, 4 or 5-celled hairs (Figure 2 le),
similar to those on the rhachis. Rhachis cylindrical, cas-
taneous or greenish brown in the upper part, hairs dense
(Figure 21c), patent, (1-) 1,5 — 2, 8 mm long, simple or
only occasionally glandular, 6-8 ( — 1 5)-celled. Spores
41 pm in diameter (Std Dev. ± 0,97), globular to
rounded triangular, trilete ridge weakly developed, con-
sisting of anastomosing cristae; distal face loosely, but
strongly cristate, proximal face sparsely so, often only
with some isolated rugose cristae on a rugulose base, so
that the spores appear echinate with blunt projections in
profile (Figure 18d, e).
Vouchers: Buitendag 1060 (PRE); Codd & De Winter 4895 (PRE);
Van der Schijff 3745 (PRE); Vassilatos & Mantell 805 (PRE); Wager
1622c ( PRE).
FIGURE 20. — Cheilanthes hirta Swartz var. inferacampestris W. &
N. Jacobsen. Transvaal, 2531 (Komatipoort): Lebombo Moun-
tains, Crocodile Bridge section of the Kruger National Park
(-BD), H. P. v. d. Schijff 3990 (holotype), x 0,25. The tall
growth and very lax habit are characteristic.
72
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
FIGURE 21. — Cheilanthes hirta Swartz var. inferacampestris W. &
N. Jacobsen. Kruger National Park, H. P. v. d. Schijff7743: a,
outline of lamina, x 0,25; b, portion of rhachis with right pinna,
x 2; c, portion of rhachis, x 13; d, stipe hair, x 70; e, lamina
hair, x 70; f, glandular rhachis hair, x 70.
Distribution
Var. inferacampestris is found from the eastern
Transvaal (southern Kruger National Park) through
eastern Swaziland, Zululand and Natal, to the Port
Shepstone area. One isolated specimen was seen from
the Devuli Ranch in the Bikita District of Zimbabwe
(Figure 22).
Ecology
The variety, although confined to low-lying hot areas
is by no means typical of xerophytic habitats, but is
usually found in sheltered shady localities, on south-
facing rocky slopes with humiferous loamy soil. It may
be found in scrub forest or in kloofs and ravines, in the
shade of large boulders or amongst undergrowth. The
annual rainfall varies between 600 mm (where the
variety grows only in moist localities) and ± 1 000 mm.
The altitudinal range is between 50 and 600 m.
FIGURE 22. — Distribution of Cheilanthes hirta var. inferacampestris,
• ; C. nielsii , ■ ; and C. hyaloglandulosa, A .
8. Cheilanthes hyaloglandulosa W. & N. Jacob-
sen in South African Journal of Botany 51: 145—148
(1985). Type: Transvaal, farm Wanhoop 78 JT, N.
Jacobsen 5255 (PRE, holo.). Figures 13g, h; 23.
The species has been described recently, but it was felt
that some supporting drawings and spore micrographs
might be informative. As the spores have not yet been
described a few words are necessary. Spores average 60
/xm in diameter, are roughly triangular with prominent
cristate trilete ridge, the surface is loosely cristate with
broad anastomosing cristae, up to 12 gm high on a
smooth base.
Vouchers: Jacobsen 5286 (PRE); Mogg 4894 (PRE).
Distribution and ecology
The species is known only from a few localities above
1 800 m altitude in the eastern Transvaal escarpment
(Figure 22), where they grow in shallow lithosols over
quartzite, along rocky shelves and amongst boulders on
east and north-facing slopes in full sunlight. The fronds
wither away during the cold season.
9. Cheilanthes nielsii W. B. G. Jacobsen , The
ferns and fern allies of southern Africa: 252 (1983).
Type: north-western Transvaal, Potgietersrus District,
farm Goedgelegen 194 LR, Koperkop, Jacobsen 5126
(PRE, holo.). Figures 1 8f — h; 24.
Cheilanthes hirta sensu N. C. Anthony: t. 13F (1984).
leones: Jacobsen: fig. 182a, b (1983).
This species was fully described by Jacobsen (1983)
and merely a few line drawings of the species as well as
micrographs of the spores are presented here. As the
latter have not yet been described this is done in this
paper.
Transvaal, 2530 (Lydenburg): Farm Wanhoop 78 JT, Dullstroom
District (-AA), Jacobsen 5255: a, outline of frond, x 0,4; b,
portion of rhachis with right pinna, X 4; c, portion of rhachis, X
10; d, basal rhachis scale, x 13; e & f, rhachis hairs, x 216; g,
stalked gland from the upper surface of the lamina, X 216.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
73
FIGURE 24. — Cheilanthes nielsii W.B.G. Jacobsen. Transvaal, 2328
(Baltimore): farm Goedgelegen 194 LR, Koperkop (-AD), Ja-
cobsen 5126 : a, outline of frond, x 0,9; b, portion of rhachis and
left pinna, x 5; c, portion of rhachis, X 14; d, hair at base of
stipe, X 1 14; e, hair at edge of pinnule, X 207.
Spores average 36 /u-m in diameter (Std Dev. ± 0,52),
are globular, the trilete ridge is not visible due to densely
anastomosing, well developed cristae about 3 /urn high
(Figure 1 8f — h).
Vouchers: Jacobsen 5125 (K); 5207 (PRE); 5251 (PRE); Rang s.n.
(PRE).
Distribution
The species is so far known with certainty from the
northern and north-western Transvaal (because of poor
preservation the few records from near Pretoria are
dubious) and from a few isolated occurrences in the
northern Cape and from one place in Botswana. A record
from SWA/Namibia is doubtful, again due to poor
preservation of the specimen (see Figure 22).
Ecology
The species inhabits very dry situations, growing on
rocky hillsides or hilltops mostly in full sunlight amongst
rock outcrops, on ledges and at boulder bases on north
and west aspects, very much rarer on SSW-facing slopes
and then in partial shade. Rainfall requirements are in the
400-600 mm range annually and the altitude lies
between 700 and 1 100 m.
Notes
C. nielsii is included in this study merely because its
indumentum has a certain similarity to that of the mem-
bers of the C. hirta complex. Anthony (1984) declares
that it is indeed a shade form of C. hirta. In view of the
data given above, this view cannot be upheld. Anthony
also states that the spores are indistinguishable from
those of C. hirta. While it is true that some members of
the C. hirta complex have similarly strongly cristate
spores, as for instance C. hirta var. hirta , others within
the complex have deviating spores. The spores of C.
nielsii are in fact not like any of the other members of the
complex as they are very small, having an average size
of 36 /xm with very little variation. The smallest spores
found within the complex are those of C. hirta var. infe-
racampestris with an average of 41 pun, while those of
var. hirta average 64 p.m. Morphologically C. nielsii is
entirely different from var. inferacampestris, a form
always growing in shade under fairly dry climatic con-
ditions. As pointed out by Jacobsen (1983) the plants
have morphologically a greater affinity to C. inaequalis
(Kunze) Mett. var. buchananii (Bak.) Schelpe and to C.
leachii (Schelpe) Schelpe as well as to C. capensis
(Thunb.) Swartz than to C. hirta. Although the possibil-
ity of a derivation from the latter cannot be ruled out, it is
felt that the specific status should be maintained because
of the consistent morphological differences and lack of
intermediates.
DISCUSSION
Spores and possible evolution
The separation of a complex of species on the basis of
spores alone is debatable and the authors quote C. Wood
(1973), that ‘great caution must obviously be exercised
when we assume that a character such as spore mor-
phology is of prime importance in either taxonomy or
phylogeny, when so little is known concerning the
methods by which such sculpturing is produced’ (this
refers to the sculpturing of the sporoderm). He found that
there was a great variation in the spores of the Thelyp-
teridaceae. Bearing this in mind, as well as the tendency
of xerophytic ferns to be apogamous and to produce
hybrids, the authors have put emphasis on morphological
characters, which are of immediate use to the botanist in
the field, and used the nature of the spores only in a
supporting function. Study of the spores has, however,
revealed the existence of a distinct and separate taxon
within the group of rather contracted members of the
complex. Later morphological studies confirmed that the
taxon differed also substantially in other respects. This
variety was named Cheilanthes hirta var. brevipilosa.
The size of the spores of members of the complex
varies greatly. The type variety, var. hirta, shows an
average of 64 pun, whereas spores of other members are
as small as 41 pun (var. inferacampestris) and those of
C. nielsii are consistently around the 36 pim mark. This
agrees with R. M. & A. F. Tryon’s (1973) findings for
the entire cheilanthoid group. The large size of the
spores of C. hirta var. hirta seems to point to an ancient
type and its occurrence on Madagascar, Reunion and
Mauritius may indicate that the variety existed already
during the Miocene, if not the Oligocene periods. The
rather large standard deviation (Std Dev.) of ± 2,71
confirms the noticeable irregularity in size and ornamen-
tation, which would indicate apogamy and tendency to
form hybrids.
Var. brevipilosa likewise seems to have separated
from the ancestral form at a fairly early age as it is pro-
bably diploid (Prof. T. Reichstein, pers. comm.), but
apparently originated later than the Miocene period. The
spores are of average size (48 ju,m) with relatively little
variation (Std Dev. ± 1,34). Var. nemorosa with its
relatively large spores (average 53 p. m) and greater
variability — the standard deviation here is ± 2,29 — is
74 Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
TABLE 1. — Measurements of laminae and pinnae (in mm) of the Cheilanthes hirta complex and related species. Taxa are arranged
from mesophytic (top) to xerophytic
Lamina
c
S
si
_i
o
cS
*
s
o
CT)
OS
£
_o
ca
i
<D
Largest pinna
probably also an older segregate. The sporoderm is
generally consistently finely reticulate. With its lax
growth and its spreading, finely divided pinnae, var.
nemorosa is easily distinguished from all other members
of the complex, even when unusually small, as in the
montane forms.
The spores of var. inferacampestris are much smaller,
averaging 41 pxn. The variety has probably evolved
from var. nemorosa in more recent times. This assump-
tion is merely based on morphological similarity, as the
sporoderm of the varieties is entirely different, being
loosely and strongly cristate in inferacampestris and
finely reticulate to reticulate-rugulose in var. nemorosa.
The spores of the two formae of var. brevipilosa with
their distinctly triangular shape, prominent trilete ridge
and rugulose-cristate sporoderm, are similar to the typi-
cal forma, which was the main reason for considering
them as derivatives of it — even though their small and
delicate, widely spreading fronds have little morpho-
logical affinity with it. The spores vary very little, hav-
ing a standard deviation of only ± 1,10 for forma laxa
and ±0,57 for forma waterbergensis.
C. contracta has entirely different spores and is there-
fore thought to have originated from a non-related tribe,
which developed in the southern Cape, and in a later
period extended its range to the Transvaal. Spore varia-
tion is minimal. C. hyaloglandulosa has large, strongly
cristate spores (± 60 pm), similar to var. hirta and has
probably evolved from it, but is considered to be a sepa-
rate species because of its dense cover of unicellular
glands on several-celled stalks. The tiny spores of C.
nielsii are indeed superficially similar in their cristate,
round sporoderm to those of C. hirta var. hirta, but they
are almost only half as large. This fact and the consistent
differences in habit exclude the plants from the C. hirta
group. C. nielsii is therefore considered a distinct spec-
ies, even though it may have derived from the C. hirta
group. Cristate sporoderms are, according to Tryon &
Tryon (1973), predominant in the cheilanthoid ferns,
even if this is .less pronounced amongst the South Afri-
can species. Yet the spores of C. marlothii (Hieron.)
Schelpe ( =Notholaena marlothii Hiem), a plant of very
different habit, are very similar to those of certain types
of the C. hirta complex [compare Anthony (1984), Plate
2, C-D with Plate 13, C— E].
Morphology, phytogeography and climate
The length and width of the lamina and of the largest
pinnae were measured as well as the angle of the pinnae
to the rhachis. These parameters show some correlation
with the climatic conditions under which the plants
grow. The results are summarized on Table 1 and the
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
75
1 S3 4 B B 7 a 9 ID 11 18 13 W 18 16 T7 18 IS BO
FIGURE 25. — Fiistograms of the ratio length to width of lamina of the
members of the Cheilanthes hirta complex and some allied spe-
cies. A, C. nielsiir B, C. hirta var. brevipilosa formae laxa and
waterbergensis ; C, C. contractor D, C. hirta var. brevipilosar E,
C. hirta var. hirtar F, C. hyaloglandulosar G, C. hirta var. infera-
campestrisr H, C. hirta var. nemorosa.
ratios of length to width of lamina and largest pinnae are
depicted on the frequency histograms in Figures 25, 26
& 27.
It becomes evident that most of the members of the
complex are typically associated with a certain type of
climate. This is discussed in the sections on the ecology
of the various taxa. The succession from east to west,
i.e. from mesophytic to meso-xerophytic to xerophytic is
reflected in the following sequence of the taxa:
C. hirta var. nemorosa-C . hirta var. inferacampes-
tris—C. hyaloglandulosa-C . hirta var. hirta-C. con-
tracta—C. hirta var. brevipilosa-C . hirta var. brevipi-
losa formae laxa/waterbergensis-C . nielsii.
The morphological changes parallel to this succession
are: the lamina becomes narrower from the mesophytic
environment towards the meso-xerophytic environment
but broadens again as the xerophytic end is approached.
The ratio maxima of length to width of the lamina moves
from 2-3 times as long as wide ( C . hirta var. nemorosa)
to 20 times (C. hirta var. hirta) and decreases to 2-3
times (C. nielsii). The largest pinnae become shorter
with the change to xerophytic conditions, being 2-6
FIGURE 26. — Ftistogram of the ratio length to width of
largest pinnae of the members of the Cheilanthes
hirta complex and some allied species. A, C. niel-
siir B, C. hirta var. brevipilosa formae laxa and
waterbergensis ; C, C. contractor D, C. hirta var.
brevipilosa ; E, C. hirta var. hirtar F, C. hyaloglan-
dulosar G, C. hirta var. inferacampestrisr Ft, C.
hirta var. nemorosa.
times as long as wide in C. hirta var. nemorosa and only
1-2 times as long as wide in C. nielsii.
The angle of the pinnae to the rhachis becomes steeper
towards the meso-xerophytic zone, but flattens out again
towards the xerophytic end, averaging about 73° in C.
hirta var. nemorosa, decreasing to between 46° and 55° in
76
250~
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
200.
150.
100.
SO.
O -
_ 0
E
E
73o 25o i5o i5o 5S0 600
"7J0
FIGURE 27. — Diagram of plotted
measurements of lamina para-
meters of the members of the
Cheilanthes hirta complex and
some allied species: top, lamina;
bottom, largest pinnae. — O — ,
C. nielsii ; — ■ — , C. hirta var.
brevipilosa formae laxa and
waterbergensis', — • — , C. hirta
var. brevipilosa ; , C.
hirta var. hirta: — , C. hyalo-
glandulosa: — — , C. hirta
var. inferacampestris: — A—,
C. hirta var. nemorosa.
C. contracta, C. hirta var. hirta and some forms of C.
hirta var. brevipilosa , but reaching 74° in the xerophytic
forms of the latter and 76° in C. nielsii.
The size and division of fronds decreases generally
from wet to dry conditions.
The relatively tall mesomorphic habit with finely
divided fronds which allows for maximum light expo-
sure in C. hirta var. inferacampestris and C. hirta var.
nemorosa gives way to the elongate meso-xeromorphic
forms of the C. hirta var. hirtalC. hirta var. brevi-
pilosa/C. contracta group with upwards directed, often
contracted pinnae suited to cope with water loss.
Towards the xerophytic end, however, no further con-
traction takes place and the formae laxa and waterber-
gensis escape desiccation by growing only in the shade
of rocks, herbs or scrub on south-facing slopes, or
wherever they are sufficiently protected from desicca-
tion. They are small and delicate and not at all xeromor-
phic. C. nielsii, the most brittle of all, grows on fully
exposed sites, in sunlight and frequently under very hot
conditions. It is, however, entirely seasonal, being green
only when the rainy season has fully set in and shrivel-
ling rapidly when it gets too dry. In this respect and with
its small rhizome and generally small size it resembles
the small therophytes of arid areas. Its deviating position
from the other members of the complex is well demon-
strated in Figure 27, where its lamina ratios plot outside
the general trend and where the ratios of the largest pin-
nae, although beginning within the trend, leave it at a
steeper angle.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We acknowledge with thanks the assistance of Miss J.
Matthews in preparing the photographs of the illustra-
tions. Mrs S. M. Perold and the Director of the Botanical
Research Institute are gratefully thanked for the SEM
photos of the spores as well as permitting the authors to
examine the specimens housed there. N. H. G. Jacobsen
thanks the Director of Nature Conservation for permis-
sion to publish this article.
REFERENCES
ANTHONY, N. C. 1984. A revision of the southern African species of
Cheilanthes Swartz and Pellaea Link (Pteridaceae). Contributions
from the Bolus Herbarium 1 1 .
CHRISTENSEN, C. 1906. Index ftlicum. Hafniae.
FEE, A. L. P. 1852. Genera ftlicum. Polypodiacees. In Memoires sur
les families des fougeres 5. Strasbourg.
JACOBSEN, W. B. G. 1983. The ferns and fern allies of southern
Africa. Butterworths, Durban, Pretoria.
JACOBSEN, W. & N. 1985. A new species of Cheilanthes (Pterido-
phyta, Adiantaceae) from the eastern Transvaal. South African
Journal of Botany 51: 145-148.
KUHN, M. 1868. F dices africanae . Engelmann, Lipsiae.
KUNZE, G. 1836. Plantarum acotyledonearum Africae Australioris
recensio nova, 1. Filices. Linnaea 10: 481-750.
LAMARCK, J. B. A. P. M. DE 1810. Encyclopedie methodique Bota-
nique, Supplement 1. Paris.
PAPPE, K. W. L. & RAWSON, W. 1858. Synopsis ftlicum Africae
Australis: 35. Cape Town.
ROUX, J. P. 1986. A review and typification of some of Kunze’s
newly described South African Pteridophyta published in his Aco-
tyledonearum Africae Australioris recensio nova. Journal of the
Linnean Society 92: 343-38 1 .
SCHELPE, E. A. C. L. E. 1969. Review of tropical African Pterido-
phyta. Contributions from the Bolus Herbarium 1 .
SIM,T. R. 1892. The ferns of South Africa. Juta, Cape Town.
SIM, T. R. 1915. The ferns of South Africa , edn 2, University Press,
Cambridge.
SMITH, J. 1842. An arrangement and definition of the genera of ferns,
with observations on the affinities of each genus. In W. J.
Hooker, The Journal of Botany 4. Longman, London.
SMITH, J. 1866 Ferns. British and foreign. Hardwicke, London.
SPRENGEL, C. 1828. Linnaei systema vegetabilium , edn 16. Got-
tingen.
SWARTZ, O. 1801. Adiantum caffrorum. Journal fiir die Botanik 2:
85. Schrader, Gottingen.
SWARTZ, O. 1806. Synopsis ftlicum. Kiel.
TARDIEU-BLOT, M. L. 1958. Polypodiacees 1. In H. Humbert,
Flore de Madagascar et des Comores. Firmin Didot, Paris.
TRYON, R. M. & TRYON, A. F. 1973. Geography, spores and
evolutionary relationships in the Cheilanthoid ferns. In Jermy et
al. , The phytogeny and classification of the ferns. Botanical Jour-
nal of the Linnean Society 67, Supplement 1: 145-153.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
77
WOOD, C. 1973. Spore variation in the Thelypteridaceae. In Jermy el
al. , The phytogeny and classification of the ferns. Botanical Jour-
nal of the Linnean Society 67, Supplement 1: 191-202.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
All specimens listed are in the National Herbarium, Pretoria, unless
stated otherwise. Those marked (Jac) are in the senior author's private
herbarium.
Acocks 270 (4); 9160, 9825, 10810 (2); 19081 (1). Allardice 1504 (4).
Archibald 5904, 5926 (5).
Balkwill & Cron 239 (2). Bamps 7017 (2). Barnard 2367 (2). Baur
136 (6). Bosman 2877 (3); s.n. (6). Bottomley 2779, 2878 (2). Bottom-
ley, Watson & Mogg2072 (3). Bradfteld 132, 132a (3). Brandmueller
1987 (3); s.n. (2). Bredenkamp 449 (3). Bremekamp & Schweickerdt
386 (6). Brown (6 Shapiro 235 (2). Brueckner 385 (4). Buitendag 1060
(7); 1246 (6). Burrows 2121 (4). Burn Davy 1670 (5).
Codd & De Winter 4895 (7). Coetzee 978 (3). Comins 810 (2). Comp-
ton 30069 (7); 30444 (6). Culverwell 0050, 0664 (7).
Dahlstrand 2584 (4). Daly 54 (2); 725 (1). De Beer 177 (2). De Jonc-
heere 292 (2); 294 (6); 303 (7). Dieterlen 264a (2); 264b (6); CH 6721
(3). Dyer 1698 (2).
Elliott 1506c (3). Emdon 85 (1). Esterhuysen 2053, 13157 (4); 15517
(6); 17082, 25808, 25917 (1); 26070 (6).
Fisher & Schweickerdt 540 (7). Flanagan 192c (2). Fourie 117121 , 791
(2); 903 (6).
Galpin M 700 (5). Gibbs Russell 3042 (2); 3127 BA, 4570 ( 3). Giffen
FH 1838 (4); FH 1854, s. n. (3). Grant 3180 (2). Griffin s. n. (4).
Guillarmod 176 (2); 808, 830 (3).
Hafstroem 858 (4); 921 (9); 1187 (4); 5117 (6). Hafstroem & Acocks
1950 (6). Hanekom 1432 (1). Hardcastle 2 (6); 274 ( 2). Henrici 1733
(2), 3966 (4). Hilliard & Burn 1713 (6). Holub s. n. (2). Huntley 1915
(2).
Jacobsen 5165, 5177, 5181, (1) Jac; 4269, 4521, 4525, 4907, 5062,
5318, (2) Jac; 4522, 4628, 5069, 5262, 5267, 5502 (3) Jac; 5254 (3)
PRE, Jac; 5185 (4); 5121, 5137 (5); 2309, 4337, 4369, 5113, 5638,
5657, 5672 (6) Jac; 4443 (6); 5255 (8) FR, Jac, PRE; 5286 (8) PRE,
Reichstein; 5125 (9) K; 5126, 5199, 5207, 5251 (9). Jacobsz 413 (3).
Jenkins 910c, 914c (2). Johnson 643 (5). Jooste 193 (4).
Kluge 2179 (6). Kotsokoane 248 ( 6). Krijt2311 (3).
Lambrechts 45 (2). Lang 5112 (6). Leach & Bayliss 12671 (2). Leen-
dertz 856c, 980e, 1076, 2959 (2); 800 (3). Leeuwenberg 10912 (3).
Liebenberg 7263 (1). Lindstedt 63 ( 4). Louw2 (3).
Marloth 761 (2); 1077 (4); 4734, 6915 (1). Marsh s. n. (1). Mauve,
Reid & Wikner 112 (1). McLoughlin 732 (6). Meyer in Herb. Giess
10775 (4). Mitchell s. n. (1). Mogg 600 (3); 1611 (2); 2282 (4); 2492
(2) ; 4210 (6); 4640 (3); 4894 (8); 7120 (2); 8882 (3); 11776, 15371,
18563 (2); 20729 (3). Morris 763 (7). Moss & Rogers 1169 (3). Mott
450 (2). Mueller 967 (4); 1559 (3). Murray 525 (3).
Nelson 464a (6).
Oliver <6 Mueller 6455 (4).
Paterson 794, 1734c (2). Pegler 269 (6). Peplon 6007 (7). Pocock S
181 (1). Potgieter 21830 (3). Rang s. n. (9). Rauh & Schlieben 9762
(3) . Reid 124, 170 (2); 462, s. n. (3). Repton 5335 (3). Roberts 3228
(ft). Rodin 1052 (2); 4127 (5). Rogers 990c (2); s. n. (3). Rogers &
Moss 3583 (3). Rose & Innes 148 (2).
Scharf 1164 (1). Scheepers 434 (6), 1080 (2), s. n. (3). Schelpe 5912
(4) , 5919 (1). Schlechter 16c (1), 995c (2). Schlieben 11045 (4).
Schmitz 400 (6); 4204, 6471 (3); 6506 (6). Schweickerdt s. n. (2). Sim
193c, 194c (2); 345 s. n. (3); 1244c, 3678 (2). Smith 4408 (2). Smook
942 (2); 2019 (3). Smook & Harding 703 (4). Snijman 9 (3); 334 (1).
Siam 83, 177 (3); 178 (4). Story 3390 (2). Strey 4254 (2); 6167, 7918
(6).
Taylor 5653 (3); 5915 (1); 7995 (6); 8009 (2). Theiler s. n. (2). Theron
856 (5); 2469 (2); 6475 (4). Thode A1877 (3). Tyson 136 (4).
Van der Schijff53 (5); 604 (7); 3745, 3990 (7); 5338 (2); 5560 (6). Van
der Schijff & Schweickerdt 5773 (1). Van Hoepen 1675 (2). Van Wyk
s. n. (2). Vassilatos & Mantell 805 (7). Venter 1118 (2).
Wager 33 (3); 198 (6); 1480 (1); 1622 (7); 4595, s. n. (6). Wasserfall
12 (2). Watson s. n. (3). Werdermann & Oberdieck 1328 (9). Werger
141 (3). Wesf j. n. (6). Williams 793c ( 6). Wilman 1507c (4).
Zeyde 159 (2).
'
Bothalia 18,1:79-88(1988)
Solarium (Solanaceae) in Ghana
Z. R. BUKENYA* andJ. B. HALL**
Keywords: food crops, Ghana, indigenous taxa, key, medicinal plants, ornamental plants, Solanum, Solanaceae
ABSTRACT
Of the 22 species, subspecies and varieties in the genus Solanum L. (Solanaceae) that occur in Ghana, about 15 are
indigenous. In Ghana serveral members of the genus are utilized as food crops while others are put to medicinal and
ornamental use. Up-to-date and detailed descriptions for all the Solanum taxa occurring in Ghana and a key to the species
are provided.
UITTREKSEL
Van die 22 spesies, subspesies en varieteite in die genus Solanum L. (Solanaceae) wat in Ghana voorkom, is ongeveer
15 inheems. In Ghana word verskeie lede van die genus as voedselgewasse benut terwyl ander as medisinale en sierplante
aangewend word. Die jongste en uitvoerige beskrywings van al die Solanum- taksons wat in Ghana voorkom en ’n sleutel tot
die spesies word verskaf.
CONTENTS
Introduction 78
Materials and methods 80
Descriptions of Solanum species 81
Solanum L 81
Key to species 81
Subgenus Solanum 82
Section Solanum 82
1.5. nigrum L 82
la. subsp. nigrum 82
2. S. americanum Mill 82
3. S. scabrum Mill 82
Section Afrosolanum Bitter 82
4a. S. terminate Forssk. subsp. welwitschii
(C.H.Wr.) Heine 82
4b. S. terminate Forssk. subsp. inconstans
(C.H.Wr.) Heine 83
Subgenus Brevantherum (Seithe) D’ Arcy 83
Section Brevantherum D’Arcy 83
5. S. erianthum D. Don 83
Subgenus Leptostemonum (Dun.) Bitter 83
Section Acanthophora Dun 83
6. S. mammosum L 83
7. S. aculeatissimum Jacq 83
8. S. capsicoides All 84
Section Ischyracanthum Bitter 84
9. S. arundo Mattei 84
Section Melongena 84
10. S. melongena L 84
11.5. incanum L 84
12. 5. macrocarpon L 84
13.5. wrightii Benth 85
Section Oliganthes Bitter 85
14. S. anguivi Lam 85
15. 5. aethiopicumL 86
16. S. gilo Raddi 86
Section Torva Nees 86
* Senior Lecturer, Botany Department, Makerere University, P.O.
Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
** Formerly: Senior Lecturer, Botany Department, University of
Ghana. (Deceased).
MS. received: 1987.02.02.
17. S. torvum Swartz 86
1 8 . S. anomalum Thonn 86
Subgenus Potatoe (G. Don) D’Arcy 87
Section Potatoe 87
19. S. tuberosum L 87
Section Jasmino solanum Bitter ex Seithe 87
20. S. seaforthianum Andr. var. disjunctum
Schulz 87
Discussion and conclusions 87
Acknowledgements 88
References 88
INTRODUCTION
The genus Solanum L. contains about 2 000 species of
which about 15 are indigenous to Ghana. The rest have
been introduced and are now cultivated crops, viz. 5.
scabrum Mill., S. melongena L. and S. tuberosum L.
Others are introduced ornamentals, including 5. mam-
mosum L., S. capsicoides All. and S. wrightii Benth.,
whereas 5. americanum Mill, and S. arundo Mattei are
weeds of recent introduction and a species introduced
into Legon Botanical Garden, respectively.
The genus is of great economic importance, with seve-
ral species that are food crops, yielding edible leaves,
fruits and tubers. Other species are medicinal plants,
ornamentals or weeds of cultivation. The genus is widely
distributed throughout the world.
Since the genus Solanum was described by Linnaeus
in 1753, it has been reclassified innumerable times, and
a multitude of species, subspecies and varieties has been
named. The major revision of Solanum in Africa was
done by Bitter (1913, 1917, 1921, 1923), utilizing
mainly collections from German expeditions. He erected
a partial classification of Solanum. Despite some limita-
tions, especially the validity of some of his varieties
which are based on minor variations and are of very local
occurrence. Bitter’s work is the most authoritative avail-
able today on African Solanum.
D’Arcy (1972) provided a modem classification of the
genus Solanum into subgenera, sections and series and
his classification is widely followed today.
80
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
Although the above major works and others attempted
to streamline the taxonomy of Solatium, the genus is a
difficult one and is complicated by several factors. These
factors include the difficulty of associating the names of
Solatium used by earlier taxonomists with the plants of
today due to early descriptions being brief, often vague
and frequently lacking in characters now considered to
be diagnostic. Again some of the early names, for exam-
ple many of the names of Linnaeus and those before him,
were not typified, or if so, the type is not easy to discern
(Hepper 1979).
Another problem is the occurrence of polyploid series
within taxa (Edmonds 1977), for example tetraploids and
hexaploids within the S. nigrum complex. These may
provide a barrier to hybridization between morphologi-
cally similar plants leading to cytoraces difficult to dif-
ferentiate using classical methods.
There is also considerable phenotypic plasticity within
species and hybridization between closely related spe-
cies. Hybridization followed by inbreeding may result in
formation of new populations different from either pa-
rent. This is particularly true for the cultivated species. A
large number of ‘microspecies’ or ’semispecies’ (Grant
1971 ) occur in section Solatium and it is problematical to
decide how many of these deserve taxonomic recogni-
tion.
Today there is no single up-to-date work covering the
classification of the entire genus in West Africa. Gbile
(1979) made descriptions of Solatium species in Nigeria.
His work was however based only on the herbarium
specimens kept at the Forest Herbarium Ibadan (FHI).
He therefore did not treat all the Solatium species occur-
ring in Nigeria. In Ghana itself not much work has been
done on Solatium. Some data on Solammi are found in
Floras, including the Flora of tropical Africa (Wright
1906) and the Flora of west tropical Africa (Heine
1963). In the Flora of tropical Africa, species were
viewed in a narrow sense and interspecific variation
seems to have been ignored. Species delimitation was
based on inadequate material and on few morphological
characters.
Wright (1975), Nsowah (1969) and Hossain (1973),
studied a few species of Solatium in Ghana. Wright
(1975), however, based his study on specimens collected
from one district (Cape Coast), hence the complex range
of variation of the species he studied, particularly S.
nigrum s.L, could not be appreciated. Nsowah (1969)
unfortunately did not identify with care the several
strains of garden eggs he studied.
Despite the existence of the FWTA edn 2 (Heine
1963), many workers, especially in horticulture and ge-
netics, continue to misidentify Solatium spp. For exam-
ple Epenhuijsen (1974) misapplied the names S. gilo
Raddi to S. macrocarpon L., S. iticanum L. to S. gilo
and S. scabrum to 5. nigrum L.; Nsowah (1969) misap-
plied S. integrifolium Poir to S. gilo.
Such misidentifications occur because, unfortunately,
the FWTA, edn 2 does not provide full descriptions for
the West African Solanum spp. but only gives a key to
the species. With a key alone one is likely to go wrong in
identification of critical species and the key in this Flora
does not, in some cases, bring out differences between
closely related species. This flora, like the treatment of
Solanum by Gbile (1979), does not give consideration to
experimental work on cultivated species, e.g. S. gilo
Raddi, S. aethiopicum L. and S. macrocarpon L., hence
their variability was not appreciated. Critical species like
S. nigrum complex were treated only in the broad sense.
We have therefore attempted to provide detailed, up-
to-date descriptions of all the Solanum spp. occurring in
Ghana.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The gross morphological studies were based on about
200 specimens. A large number of these specimens were
those already existing at the Legon herbarium, Ghana,
whereas others were freshly collected by the authors
from various regions of Ghana.
Information on all the specimens was recorded and the
morphological characters of the species scored. For
TABLE 1. — Infrageneric classification of Ghana Solanum spp. based on
D’Arcy (1972)
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
some of the species, viz. S. nigrum s.l., S. americanum,
S. scabrum, S. melongena, S. macrocarpon complex, S.
anguivi Lam., S. aethiopicum L. and S. gilo, various
accessions were collected from different localities in
Ghana and were grown in an experimental plot at Legon.
The morphological characteristics of the plants belong-
ing to the above species were observed throughout the
various developmental stages and measurements of, for
example, flower and fruit characters were based on ma-
ture live plants. Specimens for the herbarium were ob-
tained from these plants.
After the study all the specimens were deposited at the
Legon herbarium. Some of the specimens studied are
cited under the species descriptions. The infrageneric
81
classification of Ghana Solatium spp. (Table 1 ) is based
on D’Arcy (1972).
DESCRIPTIONS OF SOLANUM SPECIES
Solanum L., Species plantarum: 184-188 (1753);
L.: 85 (1754); D’Arcy: 85(1973).
The genus is recognized by the 5-parted calyx and by
long, often connivent anthers dehiscing by terminal
pores and with short filaments. Other useful characters
for recognition are the frequently rotate, 5-lobed corolla,
the fruit being a berry with flattened seeds; often stellate
pubescence and prickles; the often extra-axillary, usually
cymose inflorescence.
KEY TO SPECIES
la Plants climbers:
2a Leaves deeply lobed 20. S . seaforthianum
2b Leaves more or less entire:
3a Fruits spindle-shaped; inflorescence lateral, up to 7-flowered 4b. S. terminate subsp. inconstans
3b Fruits globose; inflorescence terminal, spiciform, up to 40-flowered 4a. S. terminate subsp. welwitschii
lb Plants non-climbers:
4a Leaves compound; stolons tuberous 19. S. tuberosum
4b Leaves simple; tuberous stolons absent:
5a Fruits red when mature:
6a Leaves glabrous when mature, apart from a few scattered stellate hairs:
7a Flowers solitary or inflorescence with less than 10 flowers; corolla 5-6 mm long; fruit about 15 mm
diam 15. S. aethiopicum
7b Flowers up to 30 per inflorescence, axillary and subfasciculate; fruits about 6 mm diam. .. 18. 5. anomalum
6b Leaves stellate-pubescent;
8a Corolla about 8 mm long; inflorescence 3-20-flowered; fruits 7- 15 mm long 14. S. anguivi
8b Corolla about 15 mm long; flowers usually solitary, occasionally inflorescence 2( — 3 or morel-
flowered; fruits 20-70 mm long 16. S. gilo
5b Fruits more or less yellow or blackish when ripe:
9a Inflorescence umbelliform; hairs simple or absent; fruit blackish when mature:
10a Corolla about 7 mm long; fruits about 17 mm diam 3. 5. scabrum
10b Corolla 3-4 mm long; fruits 7— 10 mm diam.:
1 la Pollen diam. 17,7- 19,2 gm; seeds 1 x 1 mm; 2n=24 2. 5. americanum
lib Pollen diam. 25,1 — 28 /am; seeds 2x 1 mm; 2n = 72 la. S. nigrum s. str.
9b Inflorescence various, never umbellate; some hairs stellate; fruits yellow:
12a Fruits pubescent 5. S.erianthum
12b Fruits glabrous:
13a Small tree; upper surface of leaves with simple hairs, lower surface with stellate hairs 13. S. wrightii
13b Shrubs; hairs on both surfaces of leaves either stellate or simple, occasionally simple hairs on
upper surface, simple hairs mixed with stellate hairs on lower surface:
14a Leaves very small, about 35x25 mm, subsessile; prickles very much decurved 9. S. arutuio
14b Leaves about 170x80- 150 mm, petiolate; prickles not decurved or very slightly decurved:
15a Fruits less than 10 mm diam.; inflorescence up to 40-flowered, corymbose 17. S.torvum
15b Fruits more than 10 mm diam.; inflorescence less than 15-flowered, never corymbose:
16a Fruit length less than width r 12. S. macrocarpon
16b Fruit length greater than (rarely equal to) width:
17a Prickles almost always absent; fruits usually oval; flowers purple 10. S. melongena
17b Prickles always present:
18a Fruit with terminal nipple or mammilla 6. S.mammosum
18b Fruit without terminal nipple or mammilla:
19a Hairs on leaves all uniformly pilose; seeds winged 8. S. capsicoides
19b Hairs and seeds not as above;
20a Hairs on both surfaces of leaves all stellate; flowers purple 11. 5. incanum
20b Hairs on upper surface of leaves simple, lower with rare stellate hairs mixed with
simple hairs; flowers white 7. S. aculeatissimum
82
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
Subgenus Solatium D'Arcy in Annals of Missouri
Botanical Garden 60: 733 (1973).
Leaves subentire or shallowly lobed, often membrana-
ceous, indumentum simple, hairs rarely branching.
Prickles absent. Flowers mostly small, congested.
Corolla mostly deeply lobed; filaments often pubescent.
Anthers short, dehiscing introrsely by large, often
oblique terminal pores and sometimes ultimately by
longitudinal slits in the upper portion. Ovary glabrous.
Fruit rather small, 7—15 mm diam.
Section Solanum D'Arcy in Annals of Missouri
Botanical Garden 60: 733 (1973).
1. Solanum nigrum L., Species plantation: 186
(1753); Heine: 335 (1963); Hepper: 12 (1976); Gbile:
1 17 (1979). All the above authors have taken S. nigrum
in a broad sense.
Herb, about 1 m high. Leaves elliptic, 60— 100 x
40—70 mm; lamina glabrous when mature, margin entire
or toothed, repand or with 2-3 pairs of short lobes;
petiole 10-30 mm long. Inflorescence 6-8-flowered;
peduncle ± 10 mm long; pedicels ± 5 mm long. Corolla
3-4 mm long. Fruits 5-8 mm diam., shiny black when
ripe; fruit stalk ± 10 mm long. Seeds ± 1 x2 mm.
The name S. nigrum has been used in West Africa in a
broad sense until the work of Edmonds (Gray 1968; Ed-
monds 1971, 1972). Edmonds identified some of the
specimens we sent to her from the Ghana herbarium
(Legon), and isolated three Ghanian taxa from the com-
plex. These are S. nigrum s. str., S. americanum Mill.,
and S. scabrum Mill. The latter is easy to isolate from
the other taxa on account of its fruit size (more than 10
mm diam.). The rest of the complex of species awaits a
thorough analysis before tens of specimens in the Ghana
herbarium can be placed in the correct taxa. S. nigrum
complex is widely distributed in Ghana.
Vouchers: Western Region: Ankobra Ferry nr Axim, fl. & fr. July
1969, Enli GC 39163; Busua Bay, fl. & fr. February 1956, Morton
A 1796. Central Region: Bando nr Asebu, fr. November 1962, Hall
2411. Eastern Region: Mampong Scarp, Akwapim, fl. & fr. June
1953, Morton s.n.; Mt Ejuanema, Kwahu, fl. & fr. December 1957,
Adams 5125. Volta Region: Adzide-Keta nr Keta Lagoon, fl. & fr.
August 1957, Akpabla 1921 ; Amedzofe, fr. June 1958 , Morton A3418.
Greater Accra Region: Legon Hill, fl. & fr. May 1959, Morton A3675
Achimota, fl. & fr. February 1926, Irvine 93.
la. subsp. nigrum.
Edmonds: 141-178(1977).
Herb about 1 m high, with abundant simple hairs
when young, subglabrescent when mature. Stem robust.
Leaves usually bearing simple hairs on both surfaces and
margin, margin repand or crenate with teeth ± 5 mm
long; petiole 20—35 mm long. Inflorescence lateral, um-
bellate cymes, 6-8-flowered. Corolla ± 4 mm long.
Fruit ± 7 mm diam., shiny black when ripe. Seeds ±
1x2 mm. 2n=72 (Edmonds 1977). Pollen diam.
25,1-28 gm. This subspecies and S. nigrum as a whole
constitute a Eurasian taxon. However, it has spread to all
the other continents.
Voucher: Greater Accra Region: by the railway station, Achimota,
fl. & fr. February 1954, Morton 25359.
2. Solanum americanum Mill, in Gardener’s dic-
tionary edn 8: (1768); D’Arcy: 735 (1973); Edmonds:
141-178(1977).
Herb about 1 m high; stem with simple hairs when
young, glabrous when mature. Leaves 50-80x30—50
mm; mature lamina glabrous, margin with two pairs of
lobes, up to 10 mm long; petiole up to 20 mm long.
Inflorescence lateral, umbellate cymes, 5— 6-flowered;
peduncle ± 10 mm long; pedicel ± 7 mm long. Corolla
± 3 mm long; calyx ± 1 mm long. Fruit up to 9x10
mm, shiny black when ripe; fruit stalk 10-13 mm long;
fruiting calyx 1-2 mm long. Seeds lxl mm. 2n=24
(Edmonds 1977). Pollen diam. 17,7- 19,2 /am.
S. americanum is an introduced weed, collected from
the coast. The extent of its distribution will be fully
known only after a thorough study of the S. nigrum com-
plex has been made. It is of S American origin, probably
recently introduced into Africa.
Vouchers: Central Region: Cape Coast (Shore) nr Castle, fr. June
1979, Hall & Bukenya GC 47120; Greater Accra Region: Legon Bo-
tanical Garden (experimental plot), fl. & fr. February 1980, Bukenya
S19 (grown from seed of GC 47120).
3. Solanum scabrum Mill, in Gardener’s dictio-
nary edn 8: (1768); Edmonds: 141 — 178 (1977).
Bushy subshrub 1 - 1 ,5 m high; stem with simple hairs
when young, glabrous when mature. Leaves up to
250x200 mm; lamina glabrous; petiole up to 70 mm
long. Inflorescence lateral, umbellate cymes, 6 — 10-
flowered; peduncle 20-25 mm long; pedicel ± 5 mm
long. Corolla ± 7x1,5 mm. Fruit 13x17 mm, dull
purple-black when ripe; fruit stalk 30-40 mm long;
fruiting calyx about 2 mm long. Seeds 1x2 mm. 2n=72
(Edmonds 1977).
In Ghana S. scrabrum is known only in cultivation. It
is grown for its edible leaves. The fruits, though eaten in
Europe, where it is known as ‘garden huckleberry’, do
not seem to be eaten in Ghana. It is of African origin,
and has spread to America and other continents.
Vouchers: Greater Accra Region: Avenor, fl. & fr. July 1979, Hall
<& Bukenya GC 47130; Legon Botanical Garden (experimental plot),
fl. & fr. February 1980, Bukenya S44 (seed from GC 47130); Akligo,
fl. & fr. November 1967, GC 37361 .
Section Afrosolanum Bitter in Botanische
Jahrbucher 54: 420-1, 440 (1917); D’Arcy: 266, 274
(1972).
4a. Solanum terminale Forssk. subsp. welwitschii
(C. H. Wr.) Heine in Kew Bulletin 14: 248 (1960);
Heine: 331 (1963); Gbile: 118(1979).
S. welwitschii C.H. Wr.: 126 ( 1894); C.H. Wr.: 213 ( 1906); Bitter:
478 (1917); Hutch. &Dalz.: 206(1931).
Slender woody climber. Leaves up to 170 x 80 mm;
petiole up to 30 mm long. Inflorescence terminal, spici-
form ; flowers up to 40, in cymules, subsessile on axis.
Corolla 8-10 mm long with very few simple hairs on
outer surface, glabrous on inner surface. Fruits globose,
± 10 mm diam.; fruit stalk up to 6 mm long. Seeds ±
1 ,5 x 2,5 mm, smooth.
Subsp. welwitschii is fairly well distributed in secon-
dary forest.
Vouchers: Western Region: nr Bibiani, 11. & fr. December 1953,
Adams 2101. Central Region: nr Manso, Akim, fr. December 1933,
Irvine 2086. Eastern Region: Kade, fl. & fr. February 1955, Morton
8387; Atewa F.R., fr. January 1972, Lock & Hall GC 43502. Volta
Region: Togo Plateau, fl. April 1953, Morion 9197.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
83
4b. Solanum terminate Forssk. subsp. inconstans
(C.H. Wr.) Heine in Kew Bulletin 14: 247 (1960);
Heine: 331 (1963); Gbile: 1 18(1979).
5. inconstans C.H. Wr.: 127 (1894); Bitter: 482 (1917); Hutch. &
Dalz.: 207(1931).
S. togoense Dammer: 59 (1905).
5. suberosum Dammer: 182 (1906).
Slender woody climber. Leaves up to 100 x 50 mm;
petiole up to 18 mm long. Inflorescence subracemose,
leaf-opposed or in leaf axil, 2-7-flowered; peduncle up
to 35 mm long; pedicel ± 15 mm long. Corolla 8—10
mm long, with simple hairs on the outer surface, gla-
brous on the inner surface. Fruits spindle-shaped, ± 25
x 10 mm; fruit stalk ± 28 mm long. Seeds 1,5 x 2 mm,
embedded in a cushion of hairs ± 1 mm long.
Subsp. inconstans is a rare taxon, found in disturbed
forest. Both subspecies of S. terminale are restricted to
tropical Africa.
Vouchers: Eastern Region: Kade F.R., fl. October 1972, Hall GC
43831 . Volta Region: Togo Plateau F.R., fl. & fr. June 1972, Abbiw
GC 43712.
Subgenus Brevantherum (Seithe) D’Arcy in An-
nals of Missouri Botanical Garden 59: 267-274 (1972);
D’Arcy: 713 (1973).
Plants unarmed. Hairs branched or stellate. Leaves
mostly entire or nearly so. Anthers stout, opening by
large terminal pores and sometimes ultimately by longi-
tudinal slits. Ovary glabrous to tomentose. Fruits rather
small, 7-20 mm diam.
Section Brevantherum D'Arcy in Annals of Mis-
souri Botanical Garden 60: 716 (1973).
5. Solanum erianthum D. Don, Prodromus florae
Nepalensis: 96 (1825); D’Arcy: 717 (1973); Gbile: 118
(1979).
S. verbascifolium auct. non L.: Irvine: 733 (1961); Heine: 335
(1963).
Shrub or small tree 4-7 m high; young stem heavily
covered with sessile stellate hairs. Leaves elliptic-ovate,
entire, up to 230 x 180 mm; apex acute, base truncate,
oblique or attenuate; both surfaces of leaves bear a heavy
covering of stellate hairs with 5-15 arms raised on se-
tae; petiole about 35 mm long. Inflorescence terminal,
paniculate with numerous flowers. Flowers perfect; pe-
dicel ± 5 mm long, bearing more or less sessile stellate
hairs with ± 15 arms. Corolla 7-9 mm long, bearing
sessile stellate hairs on the outer surface, and veins on
inner suface. Calyx on both sides bearing sessile stellate
hairs. Fruit spherical, pubescent, ± 8 mm diam., green
when young, yellow when ripe; fruit stalk ± 10 mm
long. Seeds 1 x 1 mm.
5. erianthum is a widespread tropical weed. S. erian-
thum and 5. torvum form the most abundant shrub seed
stock in Ghanian forest soils, with the greatest abun-
dance in the Moist Semideciduous, Dry Semideciduous
and Southern Marginal vegetation types. When forests
are cut the seeds germinate and these species form the
most abundant secondary species. Fruits of S. erianthum
are believed to be poisonous; leaves are used for healing
‘Craw-Craw’.
The closely related species, 5. mauritianum Scop, and
S. umbellatum Miller are established elsewhere in Africa
(R. N. Lester pers. comm.). These two species however
have not yet been recorded for Ghana.
Vouchers: Western Region: Krobo, fr. May 1952, Boughey, s. n.
Eastern Region: Hweehwee nr Akwaseho, fl. June 1979, Hall & Buken
ya GC 47105; Kade F.R., Owusu, fr. August 1970, Annan & Aryeetey
GC 53378. Brong Ahafo Region: Goaso-Ntotroso, fr. April 1968,
Andoh-Ampah 53628. Volta Region: Akpafu-Mempeasem, fr. January
1950, Noamesi 64.
Subgenus Leptostemonum (Dun.) Bitter in Bota-
nische Jahrbiicher 55: 69-89 (1919); D’Arcy: 684
(1973).
Indumentum often stellate; prickles usually present.
Anthers mostly slender, tapering to the tip and opening
by small terminal pores or, if stout, they narrow abruptly
to a small tip and often open also by longitudinal slits
near the base, dehiscing introrsely or extrorsely by out-
ward bending of the tips. Ovary glabrous. Fruits often
large, (7-) 10-80 (-90-130) mm diam.
Section Acanthophora Dun., Histoire des Sola-
num: 131 - 132 (1813); D’Arcy: 709 (1973).
6. Solanum mammosum L., Species plantarum:
187 (1753); D’Arcy 712 (1973); Nee: 576 (1979).
Shrub about 1,5 m high; stem densely clothed with
simple hairs ± 2 mm long, and slightly decurved
prickles that are 5 mm long, base 2 mm broad. Leaves ±
110 x 90 mm, lobed or doubly-lobed, to about V: width
of leaf; lobes triangular; prickles on midrib straight, ±
17 mm long, base 1 mm broad, on primary lateral veins
3-8 mm long; hairs on both surfaces of leaves mainly
simple, on lower surface some stellate hairs mixed with
simple hairs; petiole up to 70 mm long with simple hairs
and straight prickles ± 13 mm long, base ± 1 mm
broad. Inflorescence 3-4-flowered; pedicel ± 7 mm
long. Corolla violet or blue, ± 12 mm long. Fruit up to
50 mm wide, bearing a terminal nipple or mammilla, 5
mammillae or protuberances often present at base.
S. mammosum is an introduced plant rarely seen, see-
mingly not naturalized. It is of South American origin,
naturally growing in disturbed habitats. It has spread to
other parts of the world as an ornamental plant. Its fruits
are poisonous.
Voucher: Ghana, Greater Accra Region: school nursery, Achimota,
fl. March 1970, Doe-Lawson GC 39999.
7. Solanum aculeatissimum Jacq., leones planta-
rum: 45 (1781); C.H. Wr.: 228 (1906); Bitter: 148
(1923); Dalziel: 432 (1937); Heine: 535 (1963); Gbile:
115(1979).
Shrub ± 1,5 m high; stem densely pubescent, with
simple hairs 0,1 — 1 mm long, and decurved prickles up
to 12 mm long with base 0,5 mm broad. Leaves ± 180 x
160 mm; lobed or doubly lobed to / width of leaf, with
3—4 pairs of major triangular lobes; simple pilose hairs
on both surfaces of leaves, rare stellate hairs on under-
side; prickles on midrib and petiole, slender, ± 15 mm
long, base ± 2 mm broad, on primary lateral veins,
slender, ± 7 mm long, base 0,8 mm broad. Inflores-
cence 3-6-flowered; petiole, 4-10 mm long. Corolla
white, ± 12 mm long; peduncle 0-0,5 mm long; pedicel
± 1 1 mm long. Fruit globose, ± 25 mm diam. Seeds 3
x 4 mm.
84
S. aculeatissimum occurs wild in secondary forest, but
is rare in Ghana. Ghana material has shorter hairs and
less abundant prickles than specimens from the moun-
tains of Sierra Leone and Cameroun. The species is trop-
ical African, found in the tropical zone and in South
Africa, but has close relationship to several South Amer-
ican species. All Ghana specimens come from the West-
ern Region.
Vouchers: Western Region: forest clearing, Awaso Sefwi, fl. & fr.
December 1953, Adams 2080\ nr Ebin timber Rd, June 1956, Enti FH
6440.
8. Solatium capsicoides All. in Melanges de Philo-
sophic et de Mathematique: 64 (1774); Nee; 574 (1979).
S. ciliatum Lam.: 21 (1799); Heine: 334 (1963).
Shrub ± 1,5 m high; stem bearing sparse simple hairs
4-5 mm long, and prickles 2— 10 mm long with base up
to 2 mm broad. Leaves ± 150x135 mm, lobed or
doubly-lobed to /—/ width of leaf; lobes 2-3 pairs,
ovate; both surfaces with sparse uniform simple pilose
hairs; margin ciliate; prickles on midrib ± 13 mm long,
base 2 mm broad, on primary and secondary lateral veins
2-7 mm long; petiole up to 50 mm long with simple
hairs and prickles 14 mm long with base 2 mm broad.
Inflorescence ± 4-flowered; pedicel ± 10 mm long.
Corolla white or pale mauve, ± 12 mm long. Fruit
globose, ± 45 mm diam. Seeds ± 1,5x2 mm, sur-
rounded by a wing ± 2 mm broad.
S. capsicoides has limited distribution in Ghana; appa-
rently introduced into botanical gardens as an ornamental
plant; it does not seem to be naturalized. Its origin is
South American (Brazil) and it has successfully spread to
all continents as a weed with preferred habitat being
drier, open lowlands.
Vouchers: Eastern Region: outside Botanical Garden Aburi, fl. & fr.
January 1957, Akpabla 1816. Greater Accra Region: Legon, fl. & fr.
October 1961, Morton A5008.
Section Ischyracanthum Bitter in Feddes Reperto-
rium, Beihefte 16; 142(1923); D’Arcy: 269, 275 (1972).
9. Solanum arundo Mattei in Bollettino del R.
Orto botanico, Palermo: 188(1908).
Shrub 1-2 m high; stem bearing stellate hairs;
prickles strongly decurved, ± 8 mm long, base up to 5
mm broad. Leaves very small with 2 pairs of lobes ± 8
mm long, ± 35 mm wide; base attenuate; small stellate
hairs with 6—8 more or less equal arms on both surfaces;
prickles on leaves straight, up to 12 mm long, base 3 mm
broad; petiole ± 3 m long. Inflorescence racemose, op-
posite a leaf or slightly below; flowers up to 10 or more;
pedicels ± 6 mm long, with stellate hairs. Corolla vio-
let, ± 13 mm long, with stellate hairs on the inner sur-
faces, on veins and on the outer surface. Fruits spheri-
cal, ± 13x12 mm, with more or less decurved stalks ±
14 mm long; young fruits variegated dark and pale green;
ripe fruits brownish. Seeds 2x2 mm.
S. arundo was probably introduced into Legon Bota-
nical Garden from northern Kenya; it is not naturalized.
Its area of concentration is in the drier parts of east tropi-
cal Africa. It has also been recorded from the west coast
of India.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
Voucher: Ghana, Greater Accra Region: Legon Botanical Garden,
fl. & fr. October 1958, Morton A3442.
Section Melongena Dun., Histoire des Solanum:
208-218 (1813); D’Arcy: 698 (1972).
10. Solanum melongena L., Species plantarum:
186 (1753); Wright: 242 (1906); Bitter: 292 (1923);
Heine: 322 (1963); D'Arcy: 704 (1973); Hepper: 122
(1976); Khan: 630 (1979).
S. edule Schumach. & Thonn.: 125 (1827); Junghans: 91 (1962).
Shrub ± 1,5m high; stem with stellate hairs of 8 - 10
unequal arms. Leaves ±150x100 mm, bearing on both
surfaces short-stalked stellate hairs, margin with 2—3
pairs of lobes up to 30 mm long; petiole about 40 mm
long. Flowers usually solitary or inflorescence 2—3-
flowered; pedicel ± 25 mm long. Corolla 20-22 mm
long, purple, petal tips apiculate, incurved. Calyx about
10 mm long, normally not prickly but prickles 2—3 mm
long may occur. Fruit ovoid or globose, 60— 130x
30—100 mm, green, with white patches, white, or
purple when young, orange-yellow to brownish when
ripe; fruit stalk 20-80 mm long, decurved. Seeds 3x4
mm.
S. melongena is cultivated for its fruits which are
eaten in stew and soup. It is a significant source of in-
come to horticultural farmers especially in the coastal
parts of southern Ghana, the species is believed to have
originated in Asia (Indo-Burma). It is cultivated on all
continents for its edible fruits.
Vouchers: Central Region: Kromantse, fr. June 1979, Hall &
Bukenya GC 47121. Eastern Region: N of Mankrong (Affram), fr.
May 1961, Morton A4193. Greater Accra Region: Nungua, fl. July
1979, Hall & Bukenya GC 47135 ; Achimota, fl. Aug. 1927, Inine
775.
11. Solanum incanum L., Species plantarum: 188
(1753); C.H. Wr.: 238 (1906); Bitter: 200 (1923); Dal-
ziel: 433 (1937); Heine; 332 (1963); Gbile: 1 18 (1979).
Shrub 1 - 1 ,5 m high; stem with stellate floccose hairs
with 8-10 more or less equal arms; prickles ± 4 mm
long, base ± 1 mm broad. Leaves ± 160x120 mm,
margin with 3 pairs of short lobes, middle lobe up to 20
mm long, both surfaces with stellate hairs; prickles on
midrib ± 3 mm long, base ± 0,5 mm broad; petiole up
to 70 mm long. Inflorescence up to 5-flowered; pedicel
± 10 mm long. Corolla violet, ± 18 mm long. Calyx,
especially on the lowermost flower, very prickly,
prickles ± 2 mm long. Fruits globose, ± 20 mm diam.,
green with light green patches when young, yellow when
ripe.
S. incanum is a rare species in Ghana. It has not been
collected since 1956. It is common in drier parts of tropi-
cal Africa and India. In Ghana it has been collected from
one locality.
Voucher: Greater Accra Region: Nungua beach, roadside, fl. May
1956, Morton 2086.
12. Solanum macrocarpon L., Mantissa Altera:
205 (1771); C.H. Wr.: 214 (1906); Bitter: 195 (1923);
Burkill: 333 (1925); Dalziel: 343 (1937); Heine: 224
(1963).
S. dasyphyllum Schumach. & Thonn.: 126 (1827); Bitter: 188
( 1923); Heine: 334 ( 1963), syn. nov.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
85
S. duplosinuatum Klotzch: 233 (1862); Wright: 243 (1906); Hutch.
&Dalz.: 207 (1931).
5. thonningianum Jacq.: 123 (181 1-16); Junghans: 91 (1962).
S. atropo Schumach. & Thonn.: 124 ( 1827).
S. zanoni Gouan (1773)Gouan: 7 (1773).
Subshrub or shrub, 0,5- 1 ,5 m high; stem terete, gla-
brous or with stellate hairs more or less sessile or on
robust setae up to 2 m long. Stem not prickly or with
straight, robust prickles up to 6 mm long, base up to 3
mm broad. Leaves 150—460 x 80-300 mm, entire or
with short lobes ± 10 mm long to deeply doubly-lobed
with major lobes up to 70 mm long; young leaves bear on
upper surface (especially on veins) simple, branched or
stellate hairs on setae up to 2 mm long, either singly or in
combination; lower surface with branched, stellate hairs
on robust setae 0,5—2 mm long and/or more or less
sessile stellate hairs; leaf margin of young leaves with
stellate hairs on robust setae up to 2 mm long or short-
stalked glandular hairs; mature leaves glabrous or with
simple hairs and stellate hairs on setae up to 2 mm long,
upper surface with sessile stellate hairs; lower surface
with stellate hairs on setae up to 2 mm long or sessile;
leaf margin with stellate hairs on setae up to 2 mm long,
sessile stellate hairs, branched or simple hairs; prickles
present or absent on leaves, when present, principally on
midrib and lateral veins, on mature leaves prickles on
midrib and primary lateral veins straight, up to 13 mm
long, base ± 3 mm broad, on secondary and tertiary
lateral nerves up to 7 mm long, base 1 mm broad; leaf
subsessile or with petiole up to 70 mm long. Inflores-
cence lateral, racemose, 3- 12-flowered, the lowermost
flower or flowers hermaphrodite, bigger than the rest,
distal flowers with short styles, functionally male, nor-
mally 1 — 2( — 3) hermaphrodite plus 1—3 functionally
male flowers present. Corolla infundibuliform-rotate or
campanulate-rotate, 20-35 mm long, white, light purp-
lish or blue, the outer surface with simple, sessile stellate
hairs or short-stalked or sessile glandular hairs, inner
surfaces glabrous. Calyx not prickly or with prickles up
to 10 mm long; outer surface with sessile stellate hairs,
stellate hairs on setae up to 2 mm long, simple hairs or
short-stalked glandular hairs; fruiting calyx often accres-
cent, 15-1 10 mm long. Ovary glabrous or with short-
stalked or sessile glandular hairs. Fruit depressed glo-
bose, 20-60 x 30-100 mm, green, ivory or purplish
white with dark stripes; when ripe yellow to brownish;
fruit stalk erect or decurved, 10—40 mm long. Seeds
3—3,5 x 2— 3 mm.
The S. macrocarpon complex is extremely variable.
In Ghana it is cultivated mainly for its leaves, especially
of plants with glabrous leaves. Leaves that are prickly
have to be de-prickled before cooking. The fruits are also
eaten. In other parts of Africa, e.g. E Africa, it is less
cultivated. It is a native species of Africa from where it
has been introduced to other parts of the world. It occurs
in almost every region of Ghana.
Vouchers: Western Region: Nkwanta, Ankasa G.P.R., fl. & fr.
January 1980, Hall GC 471680. Ashanti Region: Abodon, fr. June
1979, Hall & Bukenya GC 4711. Central Region: Anyam Main, fl. &
fr. June 1979, Hall & Bukenya GC 47122. Eastern Region: Hweehwee
nr Akwaseho, fl. & fr. June 1979, Halt & Bukenya GC 47103 ; Kade,
fl. & fr. January 1980, Hall GC 471679. Brong Ahafo Region: Bui
Nat. Park, fl. & fr. July 1976, Hall & Swaine GC 46122. Greater
Accra Region: Achimota, fl. May 1958, Akpabla 1783: Sapreiman, fl.
& fr. July 1979, Hall & Bukenya GC 47128.
13. Solatium wrightii Benth. in Flora Hongkong-
ensis: 243 (1861); Bitter: 180(1923); Heine: 248 (1960);
Irvine: 733 (1961); Heine: 335 (1963); Gbile: 119
(1979).
Small tree up to 5 m high; stem bearing prickles, and
stellate hairs on setae ± 1 mm long. Leaves ± 250 X
200 mm, with 2—3 pairs of prominent lobes up to 80 mm
long; upper surface bearing simple hairs ± 1 mm long,
lower surface with stellate hairs with 5 — 8 unequal arms
on setae ± 0,5 mm long; prickles on midrib 10-20 mm
long, base 4 mm broad; petiole ± 60 mm long; prickles
on petiole up to 20 mm long, base 4 mm broad. Inflo-
rescence ± 6-flowered; pedicel ± 20 mm long. Corolla
blue to violet, up to 30 mm long. Fruit globose, green
when young with light green patches, yellow when ripe.
S. wrightii is a decorative introduced tree; a native of
Bolivia, it has been introduced to other tropical areas of
the world.
Vouchers: Ghana, Greater Accra Region: Cadbury House 8, Achi-
mota, fl. 1935, Bannerman s. n .; Hort. Nursery, Achimota, fl. January
1958, Akpabla I860.
Section Oliganthes Bitter in Feddes Repertorium,
Beihefte 16: 1 (1923); D’Arcy: 272(1972).
14. Solanum anguivi Lam. in Tableau Encyclope-
dique et Methodique: 23 (1794); Hepper: 287—292
(1978).
5. indicum L. subsp. distichum (Schumach. & Thonn.) Bitter 13
(1923); Heine: 333 (1963); Irvine 73 (1961); Hepper: 121 (1976);
Gbile: 116(1979).
S. indicum auct. non L.
S. anomalum auct. non Thonn.
Shrub 1,5—3 m high; stem bearing small, sessile
stellate hairs with 4-8 more or less equal arms; some-
times prickly. Leaves elliptic-ovate, 100—200 x
50-100 mm, sinuate to distinctly lobed, 2—4 pairs of
lobes, lobes 20-30 mm long, apex acute to obtuse, base
oblique, occasionally truncate or subcordate; leaves bear
on both surfaces but nore so on the lower, more or less
sessile stellate hairs with 6- 10 more or less equal arms;
petiole 20—60 mm long, with dense stellate hairs. Inflo-
rescence a raceme-like cyme, occasionally flowers soli-
tary, extra-axillary, many-flowered, 5 to more than 15,
flowers mostly hermaphrodite, occasionally the distal
flowers with short styles, functionally male; peduncle
0-3—6 mm; pedicel 10-15 mm long, bearing stellate
hairs. Corolla ± mm long, white, occasionally with
light purple veins on the outer surface; with stellate hairs
outside, more or less glabrous on inner surface. Fruit
7—12 x 8-12 mm, mostly globose, smooth, green
when young, red when ripe; fruit stalk 8-15 mm long,
usually erect, occasionally horizontal or decurved. Seeds
1 ,5—2,1 mm long by 1 ,9-2,9 mm wide.
S. anguivi is widely distributed in Ghana, either wild
or as a semicultivated plant for the fruits which are bitter
and cooked in stew. The soup is taken before a meal as
an appetiser. The species is widely distributed through-
out Africa as a semicultivated plant or as a weed in
varying ecological situations. In Ghana it is found in all
the regions.
Vouchers: Western Region: Tonton F. R. (cleared area), fr. May
1956, Enti FH 6095. Ashanti Region: Abodon, fl. & fr. June 1979,
Hall & Bukenya GC 47113', Drobo, fl. & fr. April 1958, Morton
A3228. Eastern Region: Aburi, fl. & fr. April 1899. Brown 320: Ajena
86
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
to Gyakiti Rd, fl. & fr. October 1953, Morton s. n. Brong Ahafo
Region: nr Menje, fl. & fr. December 1956, Morton A2609. Volta
Region: Akpafu Mempeasem, fl. & fr. 1956, Noamesi 68. Greater
Accra Region: Achimota, fl. & fr. June 1932, Irvine 1770', fl. & fr.
March 1954, Morton GC 25400.
15. Solanum aethiopicum L., Amoenitates acade-
micae: 307 (1759); Dalziel: 432 (1937); Heine: 332
(1963); Gbile: 115(1979).
Subshrub, about 0,6 m high; stem glabrous. Leaves
ovate, about 120 x 90 mm, apex acute, base oblique,
attenuate or truncate; margin repand; young leaves bear
on both surfaces small, sessile stellate hairs with 5-8
more or less equal arms; mature leaves subglabrous; pe-
tiole 50—60 mm long. Inflorescence 2— 3-flowered, ses-
sile or flowers solitary, lateral; flowers hermaphrodite;
pedicel ± 7 mm long with scattered stellate hairs. Co-
rolla white, 5-6 mm long, glabrous; flower buds with
dense stellate hairs; style also with stellate hairs. Calyx
as long as the corolla tube. Fruit globose ± 18 mm
diam., green with dark green stripes when young, shine
red when ripe; fruiting calyx ± 7 mm long; stalk up to 12
mm long. Seeds 2,8 x 3 mm.
S. aethiopicum is occasionally cultivated by immi-
grants from Togo in southern Ghana for its leaves which
are used as a vegetable. In other parts of tropical Africa,
it is more frequently cultivated. Lester & Niakan (1986)
treat it as Solanum aethiopicum Shumach group. In
Ghana it was collected from one locality.
Vouchers: Greater Accra Region: Sarpeiman, fl. July 1979, Hall &
Bukenya GC 47131' fl. & fr. July 1979, Hal! GC 47129.
16. Solanum gilo Raddi in Atti della Societa Ita-
liana delle Scienze Modena: 31 (1 920); Bitter: 48 ( 1 923);
Hepper: 121 (1976); Gbile: 116(1979).
S. integrifolium auct. non Pior.: Nsowah: 61 (1969).
Shrub 1-2 m high; stem bearing tiny sessile stellate
hairs of 4-5 more or less equal arms. Leaves elliptic-
ovate, 100-240 x 70-180 mm, margin sinuate-repand
to distinctly lobed with 2-4 pairs of lobes up to 50 mm
long, apex acute, base oblique; both surfaces but es-
pecially the lower, with more or less sessile stellate hairs
with 7—9 unequal arms; petiole 15-80 mm long;
prickles may occasionally be present on early leaves.
Flowers usually solitary or two next to each other, rarely
2— 5 or more arising from a common stalk, extra-axillary
and hermaphrodite. Corolla ± 15 mm long, white, occa-
sionally light purple; petal tips apiculate, incurved; inner
and outer surface of corolla with stellate hairs. Fruit
ellipsoid, globose or oval, 13-70 x 13-50 mm,
smooth or with shallow longitudinal grooves, usually
solitary, occasionally two or more together, green, white
or purple when young, red when mature; fruit stalk
16-40 mm long, mostly decurved. Seeds 3x4 mm.
S. gilo is by far the most widely cultivated species of
Solanum throughout the forest zone of Ghana. Its fruits
are used in soup or stew preparation. It is preferred to S.
melongena because it has firmer flesh than the latter.
Where these two species are grown together sterile natu-
ral hybrids occur.
The type specimen was collected from Brazil, but the
species must have been introduced into South America
from Africa. The Brazilian vernacular name, ‘gilo’, was
adopted as the specific epithet. The same vernacular
name has been recorded for the species in Angola, sug-
gesting that Angola may well have been the source of the
Brazilian plants. S. gilo has subsequently been intro-
duced to other parts of the world. Lester & Niakan
(1986) treat it as Solanum aethiopicum L. Gilo group.
Vouchers: Ashanti Region: Abodon, fl. & fr. June 1979, Hall &
Bukenya GC 47116. Eastern Region: Hweehwee nr Akwaseho, fl. &
fr. June 1979, Hall & Bukenya GC 47127. Volta region: Ashiagborvi,
nr Tadzevu, V/R, fl. & fr. August 1979, Hall GC 47150. Greater
Accra Region: Legon, fl. & fr. December 1979, Hall & Bukenya GC
47116, GC47117.GC47118.
Section Torva Nees in Transactions of the Linnean
Society: 51 (1834); D’Arcy: 273 (1972).
17. Solanum torvum Swartz, Prodromus: 47
(1788); Wright: 231 (1906); Bitter: 252 (1921); Dalziel:
435 (1937); Irvine: 732 (1961); Heine 335 (1963);
D’Arcy: 708 (1973); Hossain: 293 (1973); Gbile: 118
(1979).
Shrub about 2 m high; stem bearing stellate hairs and
prickles up to 8 mm long and 7 mm broad. Leaves up to
160 x 150 mm; margin subentire or distinctly lobed with
2-3 pairs of lobes; lobes up to 50 mm long; base ob-
lique, attenuate or subcordate; young leaves with dense,
stalked stellate hairs on both surfaces; mature leaves on
upper surface with more or less sessile, stellate hairs,
4-6 armed with one arm much longer than the rest;
lower surface with stalked stellate hairs of 8-9 more or
less equal arms; petiole up to 70 mm long. Inflorescence
a corymbose cyme; lateral, distal flowers with short
styles, functionally male; peduncle ± 3 mm long; pedi-
cel ± 7 mm long, bearing glandular hairs. Corolla
white, 10-12 mm long, outer surface bearing sessile
stellate hairs, 6—7-armed with one arm much longer
than the rest, glabrous within. Calyx ± 4 mm long, lobes
triangular, bearing glandular and sessile, 7 -8-armed
stellate hairs on the outer surface, glabrous on the inner
surface. Fruit globose, 10-15 mm diam., yellow when
ripe; fruit stalk up to 20 mm long.
5. torvum is a common weed throughout the tropics.
Its fruits are collected in some parts of Ghana and eaten
in soup and stew. S. torvum has a wide distribution in
Ghana.
Vouchers: Ashanti Region: Abodon, fr. June 1979, Hall & Bukenya
GC 47112', Ashanti, fl. & fr. July 1953, Antenson s. n. Central Region:
Abura nr Cape Coast, fl. September 1962, Hall 2343. Eastern Region:
Hweehwee nr Akwaseho, fr. June 1979, Hall & Bukenya GC 47 101 ;
Bosuso, fl. & fr. January 1939, Akpabla 447. Volta Region: nr Bishop
Herman College Kpandu, fl. & fr. December 1973, Veldkamp 6086.
Greater Accra Region: Legon Hill, fl. & fr. October 1955, Adams
3371.
18. Solanum anomalum Thonn., Beskrivelse af
guineiske planter: 126 (1827); Bitter: 273 (1921); Dal-
ziel: 443 (1937) Irvine: 732 (1961); Heine: 332 (1963);
Gbile: 115(1979).
Shrub; stem glabrous; prickles about 5 mm long with
base 4 mm broad. Leaves sinuate, up to 170 x 80 mm;
base attenuate; young leaves bear on both surfaces a
dense covering of small sessile stellate hairs with 4—6
more or less equal arms; mature leaves glabrous; petiole
30—60 mm long. Inflorescence subfasciculate, in leaf
axils; peduncle ± 2 mm long; pedicel ± 6 mm long,
bearing small sessile stellate hairs. Flowers hermaphro-
dite. Corolla white, 5-6 mm long, with stellate hairs on
the outer surface, inner surface glabrous. Calyx ± 5 mm
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
87
long, bearing small sessile stellate hairs on the outer
surface, glabrous within. Fruit spherical, ± 6 mm
diam., green when young, red when ripe. Seeds 2 x
2,5-3 mm.
S. anomalum occurs wild in thickets and secondary
forest in the drier parts of the forest zone. It seems to be
restricted to West Africa.
Vouchers: Western Region: Busua Bay, fl. & fr. May 1956, Morton
A2I13. Ashanti Region: Sunyani Sec. forest, fr. June 1956, Bossman
Osei 42. Central Region: Cape Coast, Hall 548. Eastern Region: Aburi
Scarp, fl. & fr. November 1955, Morton A1755 . Volta Region: Volta
Gap, fl. & fr. October 1953, Morton s. n. Greater Accra Region:
Legon, fr. August 1979, Hall GC 47134.
Subgenus Potatoe (G. Don) D’Arcy, in Annals of
Missouri Botanical Garden 59: 272 (1972); D’Arcy: 750
(1973).
Herbs, rarely woody, often glandular-pubescent and
aromatic, unarmed; hairs simple. Leaves mostly com-
pound or deeply lobed, but simple, entire leaves often
present at certain stage. Inflorescence mostly paniculate;
peduncles once or temately branched, often pendulous;
pedicels mostly articulating near the base or above it.
Fruits 10—20 mm diam.
Section Potatoe
19. Solanum tuberosum L., Species plantarum:
185 (1753); D’Arcy: 752 (1973).
Herb ± 0,5 m high; stem with shallow grooves when
dry, and simple hairs. Stolons tuberiferous. Leaves com-
pound, interceptedly imparipinnate; major leaflets 5-7,
alternating with ± 3 pairs of minor leaflets. Leaflets
elliptic to oblong-elliptic, ± 50 x 25 mm; simple hairs
on both surfaces; subsessile, margin entire; petiole up to
60 mm long. Inflorescence paniculate, with up to 10
flowers; pedicel 12-15 mm long with simple hairs, ter-
minal on long peduncle ± 80 mm long. Flowers her-
maphrodite. Corolla white, 10—12 mm long. Calyx ± 7
mm long, with simple hairs on the outer surface, gla-
brous within. Fruits globose, about 7 mm diam.
S. tuberosum, the Irish potato, is a mainly temperate
crop introduced to Ghana at about the time of the Second
World War. First introduced at Mampong (Ashanti Re-
gion), its cultivation was only slowly taken up by the
inhabitants of the area. Potato farming was therefore
taken over by the Ministry of Agriculture, which grew it
on big farms. The project was however abandoned. The
crop spread to other areas. The present major potato
growing areas are Pepease (Eastern Region) and Amed-
zofe (Volta Region), where it is grown early in the major
rainy season by individual farmers and co-operatives.
Potato is grown for its stem tubers, 90% of which are
consumed by foreigners.
5. tuberosum had its origin in the Andes (Bircher
1960). It was introduced to Europe, from where it spread
to other parts of the world. The Ghana herbarium has not
many collections of S. tuberosum.
Voucher: Volta Region: Kpoeta, fl. August 1946, Sape s. n.
Section Jasminosolanum Bitter ex Seithe in Bota-
nische Jahrbiicher 81,3: 291 (1962); D’Arcy: 757
(1973).
20. Solanum seaforthianum Andr. var. disjunc-
tum O. E. Schulz in Symbolae Antillanae: 169 (1909);
Bitter: 309 (1923); Irvine: 732 (1961); Heine: 332
(1963); D’Arcy: 758 (1973); Gbile: 1 17 (1979).
Woody climber; stem terete, glabrous. Leaves com-
pound, imparipinnate to deeply pinnatifid with about
7-9 leaflets or lobes; leaflets up to 50 x 30 mm, ellip-
tic; lower leaflets with a more or less winged petiolule up
to 5 mm long; upper leaflets (i.e. lobes) webbed to-
gether; lamina glabrous; margin ciliolate with sparse
simple hairs; petiole up to 50 mm long. Inflorescence
glabrous, mostly terminal or lateral, paniculate with
about 20 flowers; pedicel up to 7 mm long. Flowers
hermaphrodite. Corolla blue to violet, up to 10 mm
long. Fruits spherical, ± 10 mm diam., red when ma-
ture; up to 20 from an inflorescence; fruit stalk 10-14
mm long. Seeds 2x2 mm.
S. seaforthianum is an introduced decorative climber
seemingly not yet naturalized. Its native home is central
America and the West Indies. It has spread to many parts
of tropical Africa where it has been introduced for deco-
rative purposes. The species has been recorded in
Ghana.
Vouchers: Greater Accra Region: Achimota, fl. February 1931, Ear-
won //; fl. & fr. April 1937, Onyeama 17', fl. March 1954,
Ante son s. n.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
In Ghana, the most widespread Solanum species are S.
torvum, S. aethiopicum Gilo group, S. nigrum s. I. and
S. terminate subsp. welwitschii. On the other hand, the
S. aethiopicum Shumach group, S. scabrum, S. inca-
num, S. capsicoides and S. aculeatissimum have res-
tricted occurrence.
Although some species are constant, for example S.
torvum, S. erianthum and S. aethiopicum Gilo group,
others are not. In cultivation, the S. macrocarpon com-
plex, for instance shows great variability. Bukenya &
Hall (1987) identified, named and described six cultivars
of the S. macrocarpon complex in Ghana. Bukenya 1980
(in unpublished M.Sc. thesis) studied experimentally the
S. macrocarpon complex and proposed to sink S. dasy-
phyllum under S. macrocarpon. In our description of the
S. macrocarpon complex, the former is therefore listed
as a synonym of the latter. The classification and nomen-
clature of the infraspecific categories of the S. macrocar-
pon complex need to be revised.
A detailed study of the S. nigrum complex is required
before the numerous specimens belonging to this com-
plex of species, available at the Legon herbarium, can be
sorted out.
Experimental work on the difficult species of the ge-
nus has been recommended by Bitter (1923), Hawkes et
al. (1979) and Edmonds (1979) as necessary to contrib-
ute to the improvement of the taxonomy of Solanum.
Cross breeding experiments have thrown some light on
the taxonomy of the genus. Omidiji (1979) and Lester &
Niakan (1986) for example, obtained fully fertile hybrids
from crosses involving S. gilo and S. aethiopicum. The
chemotaxonomic study by Pearce & Lester (1979) points
to a very close relationship between S. melongena and 5.
anguivi. This has raised doubts as to the specific limits
within the above sets of taxa.
88
We agree with Heine (1963) that a modem revision of
the entire genus is long overdue.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We wish to extend our gratitude to the Uganda Gov-
ernment for sponsoring the study, and the University of
Ghana, Legon for providing the facilities for the study.
We are very grateful to Prof. R. H. Lester of Birming-
ham for his detailed comments and amendments.
Thanks go to Dr J. M. Edmonds of Cambridge for
identifying some of the specimens belonging to the S.
nigrum complex. We are also grateful to all individuals
who provided us with specimens and any form of assis-
tance during this study.
REFERENCES
BENTHAM, G. 1861 . Flora Hongkongensis: a description of the flow-
ering plants and ferns of the island of Hong Kong. Lovell Reeve,
London.
BIRCHER, W. H. 1960. Gardens of the Hesperides. The Anglo-Egyp-
tian Bookshops, Cairo.
BITTER, G. 1913. Solana Africana 1. Botanische Jahrbiicher 49:
560-569.
BITTER, G. 1917. Solana Africana 2. Botanische Jahrbiicher 54:
416- 506.
BITTER, G. 1919. The papuasischen Arten von Solanum. Botanische
Jahrbiicher 55: 69—89.
BITTER, G. 192L Solana Africana 3. Botanische Jahrbiicher 57:
248-286.
BITTER, G. 1923. Solana Africana 4. Feddes Repertorium, Beihefte
16: 1-320.
BUKENYA, Z. R. & HALL, J. B. 1987. Six cultivars of Solanum
macrocarpon L. (Solanaceae) in Ghana. Bothalia 17: 91-95.
BURKILL, I. H. 1925. Solanum macrocarpon. Kew Bulletin 1925:
333-341.
DALZIEL, J. M. 1937. The useful plants of west tropical Africa.
Crown Agents, London.
DAMMER, U. 1905. Solanaceae africanae. Botanische Jahrbiicher
38: 57-60.
DAMMER, U. 1906. Solanaceae africanae I. Botanische Jahrbiicher
38: 176-195.
D’ARCY, W. G. 1972. Solanaceae studies 2. Typification of subdivi-
sions of Solanum. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 59:
262-278.
D’ARCY, W. G. 1973. Solanaceae. In R. E. Woodson Jr, R. W.
Schery & collaborators. Flora of Panama. Anrnls of the Missouri
■ Botanical Garden 60: 573—780.
DON, D. 1825. Prodromus florae Nepalensis; sive enumeratio vegeta-
bilium, quae in itinere per Nepaliam ...., Londini.
DUNAL, M. F. 1813. Histoire Naturelle, Medicinale et Economique
des Solanum. Paris, Strasbourg, Montpellier.
EDMONDS, J. M. 1971. Solanum L. In W. T. Steam, Taxonomy and
nomenclatural notes on Jamaican gamopetalous plants. Journal of
the Arnold Arboretum 52: 634-635.
EDMONDS, J. M. 1972. A synopsis of the taxonomy of Solanum sect.
Solanum (Maurella) in South America. Kew Bulletin 27: 95- 1 14.
EDMONDS, J. M. 1977. Taxonomic studies on Solanum sect. Sola-
num (Maurella). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 75:
141-178.
EDMONDS, J. M. 1979. Taxonomic studies of Solanum sect. Sola-
num (Maurella). Linnean Society Symposium 7: 529-548.
EPENHU1JSEN, V. M. VAN. 1974. Growing native vegetables in
Nigeria. FAO, Rome.
GBILE, Z.O. 1979. Solanum in Nigeria. Linnean Society Symposium
7: 113-120.
GOUAN, A. 1773. Illustrationes et observationes botanicae. Zurich.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
GRANT, V. 1971. Plant speciation. Columbia University Press, New
York.
GRAY, J. M. 1968. The taxonomy of the Maurella section of the genus
Solanum L. within South America. Ph. D. thesis. University of
Birmingham, England.
HAWKES, J. G., LESTER, R. N. & SKELDING, A. D. (eds). 1979.
The biology and taxonomy of the Solanaceae. Linnean Society
Symposiuml: 1—738.
HEINE, H. 1960. Notes on Solanum. Kew Bulletin 14: 248.
HEINE, H. 1963. Solanaceae. In F. N. Hepper, Flora of west tropical
Africa 2,2: 325-335. Crown Agents, London.
HEPPER, F. N. (ed.) 1963. Flora of West tropical Africa, edn 2,2.
Crown Agents, London.
HEPPER, F. N. 1976. The West African herbaria oflsert c£ Thonning:
a taxonomic revision and index to the IDC microfiche. Bentham-
Moxon Trust, Kew.
HEPPER, F. N. 1978. Typification and name changes of some Old
World Solanum species. In J. G. Hawkes, Systematic notes on the
Solanaceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 76:
287-292.
HEPPER, F. N. 1979. On typifying Linnaean names of Solanaceae.
Linnean Society Symposium 7 : 131-134.
HOSSAIN, M. 1973. Observations of stylar heteromorphism in Sola-
num torvum Swartz (Solanaceae). Botanical Journal of the Lin-
nean Society 66: 29 1 — 30 1 .
HUTCHINSON, J. & DALZIEL, J. M. (eds) 1931. Flora of west
tropical Africa, edn 2. Crown Agents, London.
IRVINE, F. R. 1961. Woody plants of Ghana, with special reference
to their uses. Oxford University Press, London.
JACQUIN, J. F. L. B. DE 1811 — 16. Eclogae plantarum rariorum aut
minus cognitarum 1: 123-125. Strauss, Vienna.
JUNGHANS, J. 1962. Thonning’ s and Isert' s collections from 'Danish
Guinea’ (Ghana) in west tropical Africa: 91. University of Co-
penhagen.
KHAN, R. 1979. Solanum melongena and its ancestral forms. Linnean
Society Symposium 7: 629—636.
LAMARCK, J. B. A. P. M. DE 1794. Tableau Encyclopedique et
Methodique 2: 2—3 1 . Paris.
LESTER, R. N. & NIAKAN, L. 1986. Origin and domestication of
the scarlet eggplant (S. aethiopicum L., from S. anguivi Lam.).
In W. G. D’Arcy, Solanaceae : biology and systematics:
433—456. Columbia University Press, New York.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum. 2 vols, Stockholm.
LINNAEUS, C. 1754. Genera plantarum, 5th edn, Stockholm.
LINNAEUS, C. 1759 . Amoenitates academicae. Stockholm.
LINNAEUS, C. 1771 . Mantissa plantarum altera. Stockholm.
MILLER, P. 1768. The gardener' s dictionary, 8th edn, London.
NEE, M. 1979. Patterns in biogeography in Solanum section Acantho-
phora. Linnean Society Symposium 7: 569—580.
NSOWAH, G. F. 1969. Genetic variation in local and exotic varieties
of garden eggs (egg plant); variation in morphological and physio-
logical characters. Ghana Journal of Science 9: 61-73.
OMIDIJI, M. O. 1979. Crossability relationships between some spe-
cies of Solanum, Lycopersicon and Capsicum cultivated in Nige-
ria. Linnean Society Symposium 7: 599-604.
PEARCE, K. & LESTER, R. N. 1979. Chemotaxonomy of the culti-
vated egg plant: a new look at the taxonomic relationships of
Solanum melongena L. Linnean Society Symposium 7: 615—627.
SCHULZ, O. E. 1909-10. Solanacearum genera nonnulla. In Sym-
bolae Antillanae 6: 140 - 279. Leipzig.
SCHUMACHER, C. F. & THONNING, E. 1827. Beskrivelse af gui-
neiske planter som ere fundre af Danske botanikere.
SEITHE, A. 1962. Die Haararten der Gattung Solanum L. und ihre
taxonomische Verwertung. Botanische Jahrbiicher 81,3:
261-336.
SWARTZ, O. P. 1788. Nova genera et species plantarum. In Prodro-
mus. Holmiae, Upsaliae & Aboae.
WRIGHT, C. H. 1894. Solanaceae. Kew Bulletin 1894: 126-129.
WRIGHT, C. H. 1906. Solanaceae. In W. T. Thistleton-Dyer, Flora
of tropical Africa 4: 207-261 . Reeve, London.
WRIGHT, J. M. 1975. Gross morphological studies of four species of
Solanum L. occurring in Cape Coast District of Ghana. Univer-
sity of Cape Coast.
Bothalia 18, 1:89-96(1988)
Notes on African plants
VARIOUS AUTHORS
ACAROSPORACEAE
L1THOGLYPHA, A NEW LICHEN GENUS FROM CLARENS SANDSTONE
Lithoglypha Brusse, gen. nov.
Thallus endolithicus (vel crustosus). Algae ad Chloro-
coccales pertinentes. Apothecia primuni cleistothecifor-
mia dein pseudolecideina. Excipulum atro-porphyreum,
inferne prosoplectenchymatum, superne paraplectenchy-
matum. Epithecium atro-porphyreum, paraplectenchy-
matum, evanescens. Hypothecium inspersum.
Hymenium hyalinum, 50—100 pm altum, J+ caeruleum
vel vinoso-rubescens. Paraphyses septatae, cylindricae,
conglutinatae, simplices vel ramosae et anastomosantes.
Asci clavati, tholis J— vel pallide caeruleis, gelatinis
extemis J+ caeruleis vel vinoso-rubescentibus (Figure
1). Ascosporae numerosae (± 100 vel plures), hyalinae,
ellipsoideae, simplices, parvae, 2—8 x 1—3 pm. Pycni-
dia globosa vel pyriformia, circa 150 pm diametro. Pyc-
nidiosporophora hyalina, cylindrica, septata, simplicia
vel ramosa. Pycnidiosporae acrogenae, hyalinae,
aciculares, 3,5-8 x 0,8 gun.
TYPE. — Lithoglypha aggregata Brusse
Thallus endolithic (or crustose). Algae belonging to
the Chlorococcales. Apothecia first cleistotheciform then
pseudolecideine. Excipulum dark reddish brown, proso-
plectenchymatous below, becoming paraplectenchyma-
tous above. Epithecium dark reddish brown, para-
plectenchymatous, evanescent, but vestiges always
remain at edges of hymenium. Hypothecium inspersed.
Hymenium hyaline, 50- 100 pm high, J+ blue to wine-
red. Paraphyses septate, cylindrical, conglutinate,
simple to branched and anastomosed. Asci clavate,
tholus J- or pale blue, external gel J+ blue or wine-red
(Figure 1). Ascospores numerous (± 100 or more),
hyaline, ellipsoid, simple, small, 2—8 x 1—3 gim.
Pycnidia globose or pear-shaped, about 150 pm diam.
Pycnidiosporophores hyaline, cylindrical, septate,
simple to branched. Pycnidiospores acrogenous, hyaline
needles, 4-8 x 0,8 pm.
Etymology: ‘lithos’ (Greek) = rock, ‘glyphe’ (Greek)
= writing on stone tablet or an engraving.
Lithoglypha aggregata Brusse, sp. nov.
Thallus endolithicus. Algae ad Myrmeciam perti-
nentes, cellulis 5—17,5 gm diametro. Apothecia breviter
pseudolirellina, usque ad 0,4 mm lata, aggregata,
fasciculis ad 6 mm diametro. Excipulum 15 — 20 pm
crassum, atro-porphyreum. Epithecium circa 15 pm
crassum, atro-porphyreum, evanescens. Hypothecium
hyalinum vel stramineum, obconicum, usque ad 50 pm
crassum. Hymenium hyalinum, 65-80 pm altum, J +
caeruleum. Paraphyses septatae, cylindricae, congluti-
natae, simplices vel ramosae et anastomosantes, lumini-
bus 0,8— 1 ,3 pm crassis. Asci clavati, 60— 67 x 14-26
pm, tholis J+ pallide caeruleis (Figure 1). Ascosporae
numerosae, hyalinae, ellipsoideae, simplices, 4—7 x
1, 3-2,4 pm. Pycnidia globosa vel pyriformia,
100- 180 pm profunda, 70—1 10 pm lata. Pycnidiospo-
rae acrogenae, hyalinae, aciculares, 3,5— 7,5 x 0,8 pm.
Thallus sine materiis chimicis.
TYPE. — Natal, 2929 (Underberg: 65 km SW of
Estcourt, Giant’s Castle Game Reserve, about half-way
along Giant’s Hut trail, along umChezi (Bushman’s)
River, on Clarens Sandstone on NE slope, in full sun,
alt. 1 950 m (— BC), F. Brusse 4558, 1986.01 .23 (PRE,
holo.; BM, COLO, LD, iso.). Figure 2.
Thallus endolithic. Algae, Myrmecia, 5-17,5 pm
diam. Apothecia shortly pseudolirelline to sometimes
round, up to 0,4 mm wide, aggregated, clusters to 6 mm
across. Exciple 15 — 20 gm thick, dark reddish brown.
Epithecium about 15 gm thick, dark reddish brown,
evanescent (except at edges). Hypothecium hyaline to
stramineous, obconical, up to 50 gun thick. Hymenium
hyaline, 65 — 80 pm high, J + blue. Paraphyses septate,
90
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
cylindrical, conglutinate, simple to branched and anasto-
mosed, lumens 0,8— 1 ,3 /zm thick. Asci clavate, 60-67
x 14-26 /zm, tholus J + pale blue (Figure 1).
Ascospores numerous, hyaline, ellipsoid, simple, 4-7
x 1, 3-2,4 gm. Pycnidia globose to pear-shaped,
100—180 /zm deep, 70-110 gm wide. Pycnidiospores
acrogenous, hyaline needles, 3, 5-7, 5 x 0,8 /zm.
Chemistry: no lichen substances found by TLC.
FIGURE 2. — Lithoglypha aggregata Brusse, habit. F. Brusse 4558 ,
holotype. Scale in mm.
This new genus resembles Sarcogyne Fw. most
closely, but differs in the pycnidiosporogenous cells and
pycnidiospores which are needle-shaped instead of very
small ellipsoid, as in Sarcogyne (Poelt 1969: Poelt &
V£zda 1981 ).
The genus Sarcogyne has recently been subdivided
into Polysporina V£zda (1978; Poelt & V£zda 1981),
but they may be based on the same type, depending on
the clarification of the status of Sarcogyne corrugata
Fw., the type of Sarcogyne. Zahlbruckner (1927)
regarded S. corrugata as a synonym of S. simplex
(Davies) Nyl., the type of Polysporina V£zda (1978).
The genus Myriosperma Naeg. in Hepp, is illegitimate
(Art. 42b, Voss et al. 1983), and is therefore not avail-
able for those species with uncarbonized exciples and
epithecia. Nevertheless, Lithoglypha differs from both
these groups of Sarcogyne, by its pycnidiospores, which
are needle-shaped instead of very small ellipsoid (Poelt
1969; Poelt & V£zda 1981).
Besides the clear-cut difference in the pycnidiospores,
L. aggregata resembles S. simplex, also known from
non-calcareous rocks, but the apothecia show little ten-
dency to become fused into clumps. S. simplex, thus far
known only from the northern hemisphere, also has sig-
nificantly thinner ascospores. A species with a similar
apothecial habit is 5. cyclocarpa (Anzi) Stnr., but this is
an obligately calcicolous lichen, with a well developed
epilithic thallus, with thinner ascospores and which is
also known only from the northern hemisphere — only
Europe and western Asia in fact (Magnusson 1935,
1936, 1937; Poelt 1969; Poelt & VSzda 1981; Zahl-
bruckner 1927).
Another species with a tendency to produce clustered
apothecia is Sarcogyne austroafricana (Zahlbr.) Magn.,
but this is a true Sarcogyne with very small ellipsoid
pycnidiospores, 2—2,5 x 1 /xm in size (not present in
original description). The apothecia of S. austroafricana
are also larger [about the size of S. clavus (Ram.) Krem-
pelh.] and the clusters are composed of only a few apo-
thecia that are only slightly distorted. The hypothecia of
S. clavus and S. austroafricana are a dirty brown (Mag-
nusson 1936, 1937; Zahlbruckner 1926), whereas that of
L. aggregata is at most stramineous.
The photobiont of Lithoglypha aggregata is a species
of Myrmecia, which is also typical for Sarcogyne
(Tschermak-Woess 1978).
This new lichen is presently known only from expo-
sures of the Clarens Formation, otherwise known as
Cave Sandstone, more or less encircling Lesotho. The
two known records come from both sides of Lesotho but
in the northern half, which may indicate its absence in
the south-west.
O.F.S. — 2828 (Bethlehem): Clarens, on rocks (-CB), J. E. van der
Plank 1896, 1943.07. (PRE).
REFERENCES
MAGNUSSON, A. H. 1935. On the species of Biatorella and Sarco-
gyne in America. Annales de Cryptogamie Exotique 7: 115-146.
MAGNUSSON, A. H. 1936. Acarosporaceae und Thelocarpaceae.
Rabenhorst’s Kryptogamen-Flora, edn2, 9,5, 1: 1-318.
MAGNUSSON, A. H. 1937. Additional notes on Acarosporaceae.
Acta Horti Gotoburgensis 12: 87- 103.
POELT, J. 1969. Bestimmungsschliissel europaischer Flechten, pp. 71
+ 757. Cramer, Lehre.
POELT, J. & VIiZDA, A. 1981. Bestimmungsschliissel europaischer
Flechten, Erganzungsheft 2: 248-249. Cramer, Vaduz.
TSCHERMAK-WOESS, E. 1978. Myrmecia reticulata as a phyco-
biont and free-living — free-living Trebouxia — the problem of Ste-
nocybe septata. The Lichenologist 10: 69-79.
VEZDA, A. 1978. Neue oder wenig bekannte Flechten in der Tsche-
choslowakei. II. Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica 13:
397-420.
VOSS, E. G. etal.(t ds) 1983. International Code of Botanical Nomen-
clature. Regnum Vegetabile 111:1 -472.
ZAHLBRUCKNER, A. 1926. Afrikanische Flechten (Lichenes).
Botanische Jahrbiicher 60: 468-552.
ZAHLBRUCKNER, A. 1927. Catalogus lichenum universalis 5:
9-27. Bomtraeger, Leipzig.
F. BRUSSE
MS. received: 1987.07.13.
ADIANTACEAE/PTERIDACEAE
DORYOPTERIS PILOSA, A NEW RECORD FOR SOUTH AFRICA
On the 25th October 1980, the junior author collected
the fern specimen Jacobsen 5252 in the Penge area of the
eastern Transvaal (Quarter degree sheet 2430 AD at an
altitude of 840 m) in the shade of dry scrub, where the
plant grew associated with Ceterach cordatum (Thunb.)
Desv. The plant is hairy, 260 mm tall and displays strong
dimorphism, with long fertile fronds and short sterile
ones (Figure 3). At that time it was examined only
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
casually by the senior author and was filed away
amongst plants ascribed to the Doryopteris concolor
(Langsd. & Fish.) R. & A. Tryon complex.
In January 1987, Mrs Susan Strauss of the Fern
Society of Southern Africa sent a fragmentary specimen
of a hairy fern to the senior author, consisting of a long-
stalked fertile frond, 150 mm high, and a very short 50
mm high sterile frond. The plant obviously belonged to
the genus Doryopteris. It was found in the Thabazimbi
District, in the Kransberg area on the farm Geelhout-
bosch 269 KQ (2427 BC) at an altitude of 1 350 m. The
little clump of plants grew together with Cheilcmthes
concolor , Ceterach cordatum and Anemia simii Tard.
On checking through the senior author’s herbarium it
was found that Jacobsen 5252 and Susan Strauss s.n. are
specimens of a species distinct from Cheilanthes conco-
lor. They were identified as Doryopteris pilosa (Poir.)
Kuhn. This species is described and illustrated in Tar-
dieu-Blot (1958): 146, Figure 21, 3-5. As it has so far
not been described in the comprehensive literature on
southern African ferns (Jacobsen 1983; Schelpe &
Anthony 1986), its synonyms and a short description are
inserted here (mainly after Tardieu-Blot, 1958).
FIGURE 3. — Doryopteris pilosa from Penge, eastern Transvaal, x
0,4.
Doryopteris pilosa (Poir.) Kuhn in C. C. von der
Decken’s Reisen in Ost Afrika in 1859-1861, 3,3:63
(1879). Pteris pilosa Poir. in Lam.: 717 (1804). Pellaea
pilosa Hook.: t. 1 12A (1858). Allosorus pilosus Kuntze:
806 (1891). Cheilanthes heterophylla Willd. in Kaulf.:
120 (1824). Pellaea hirtula C.Chr.: 196 (1925).
91
Rhizome short, with tufted fronds and linear clathrate
scales, composed of elongate cells. Sterile fronds with
very short stipe 20—30 mm long, bearing pale, thin and
narrow, reddish scales; lamina 30—40 mm long and
broad, triangular, hirsute on both surfaces, palmately
lobed, with the basal lobe basiscopically developed and
sinuately lobed, upper lobes entire, rounded. Stipe of
fertile fronds 180—200 mm long, dark brown, shiny,
scaly at the base, but increasingly beset upwards with
stringy, adpressed matted hairs; lamina pedate-trian-
gular, 60—120 mm long, 2-pinnate to 3-pinnatifid, ulti-
mate lobes incised to % of their length, the lowest basal
pinnules strongly basiscopically developed, the upper
pinnae decurrently lobed; lower surface pilose with
whitish or reddish hairs and narrowly lanceolate, caudate
scales on costae and rhachis; costae dark brown and
shiny for half the length of the pinnae. Sori continuous
with a scarious, narrow, slightly fringed indusium; spo-
rangia long-stalked (fide Tryon 1942); spores globular
tetrahedral with convex faces and short, irregularly
reticulate cristae (fide Tardieu-Blot 1958).
In view of some recent nomenclatural changes within
the genus Doryopteris , which resulted in the transfer of
some species to the genus Cheilanthes , the authors have
paid particular attention to the characteristics of this
species. They are of the opinion that due to the strong
dimorphism, the pedate, non-multipinnate structure of
the fertile leaf (Tryon & Tryon 1982) and the long-
stalked sporangia (Tryon 1942), the species should
remain within the genus Doryopteris.
The species was so far known only from Madagascar
(Tardieu 1958), Mauritius, Reunion (Tardieu-Blot
1960), the Congo Republic and Zaire (Tardieu-Blot
1953). The two widely separated localities in the
Transvaal are new records (Figure 4). The distribution
pattern is entirely disjunct and the ecology is somewhat
puzzling. The locality in the Congo Republic is given as
near Djambala, about 180 km north of Brazzaville, i.e.
in an area of tropical rain forest with an annual rainfall of
1 200— 1 600 mm, whereas all the other occurrences are
apparently in drier areas. Tardieu-Blot (1958) however,
mentions ‘foret tropophile et bush xerophile’ for the lo-
calities in the relatively dry south-west of the Malagasy
FIGURE 4. — The distribution of Doryopteris pilosa.
92
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
Republic. Those on Reunion and Mauritius are concen-
trated on the drier south-western rain shadow side of the
islands, where the annual rainfall is between 475 and 890
mm (White 1983), with a very distinct dry season.
The South African localities seem to have a climate
similar to that of south-western Madagascar (400-500
mm annually). The plants grow on south facing rocky
slopes, in the shade or half-shade of scrub. Their appear-
ance is xeromorphic.
The very distinct disjunct distribution pattern is not
easily understood. It is comparable to that of other ferns
such as Microsorium pappei (Mett. ex Kuhn) Tard.
(Madagascar, Tanzania, Zimbabwe, Natal), Asplenium
christii Hieron. (Kenya/Tanzania, Zimbabwe/Mozam-
bique and Zululand), Asplenium platyneuron (L.) Oakes
(North America, South Africa), Elaphoglossum con-
forme (Swartz) J. Sm. (St Helena, Liberia, tropical east
African mountains, south-western Cape) and Doryop-
teris callolepis (East African mountains, Zimbabwe,
south-western Cape), to name but a few.
In a number of occurrences very specific edaphic
and/or climatic conditions may be responsible, other
records may represent relics of a former, wider distribu-
tion. The discovery of exotic invaders in a number of
oases with totally sporadic distribution patterns, how-
ever, seems to point more and more to completely
chance settlement, facilitated by the minute spores
readily distributed by wind. Such sporadic distribution
records are known for Lunathyrium japonicum (Thunb.)
Kurata, Adiantum hispidulum Swartz, Macrothelypteris
torresiana (Gaud.) Ching and others. In many instances
more complete records, supported by new finds, may
close such distribution gaps or at least make the explana-
tion of these sporadic occurrences more credible.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The assistance of Miss J. Matthews with the illustra-
tions is gratefully acknowledged. N. H. G. Jacobsen
thanks the Director of Nature Conservation, Transvaal,
for permission to publish this paper.
REFERENCES
CHRISTENSEN, C. F. A. 1925. Pellaea hirtula. Supplement (ad
Bonapart: Fougeres de Madagascar). Hagerup, Copenhagen.
HOOKER, W. J. 1858. Species ftlicum. Pamplin, London.
JACOBSEN, W. B. G. 1983. Ferns and fern allies of southern Africa.
Butterworths, Durban, Pretoria.
KAULFUSS, G. F. 1824. Enumeratio ftlicum. Leipzig.
KUHN, F. A. M. 1879. Doryopteris pilosa. In C. C. von der Decken,
Reisen in Ost Africa in 1859 - 1861 . Leipzig & Heidelberg.
KUNTZE, C. E. O. 1891 . Revisio generum plantarum 2. Leipzig.
LAMARCK, J. B. A. P. M. DE 1804. Encyclopedic methodique.
Botanique 5. Paris.
SCHELPE, E. A. C. L. E. & ANTHONY, N. C. 1986. Flora of
southern Africa. Pteridophyta. Botanical Research Institute, Pre-
toria.
TARDIEU-BLOT, M. L. 1953. Les pteridophytes de l’Afrique Inter-
tropicale Francaise. Memoires de I'Institut francais d’Afrique
noire 28:1-241.
TARDIEU-BLOT, M. L. 1958. Polypodiacees I. In H. Humbert,
Flore de Madagascar et des Comores. Firmin Didot, Paris.
TARDIEU-BLOT, M. L. 1960. Les fougeres des Mascareignes et des
Seychelles. Notulae Systematicae 16, 1 — 2: 151—201.
TRYON. R. M. 1942. A revision of the genus Doryopteris. Contribu-
tions from the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University 143: 3 — 80.
TRYON. R. M. & TRYON, A. F. 1982. Ferns and allied plants.
Springer Verlag, Stuttgart.
WHITE, F. 1983. The vegetation of Africa. UNESCO, Paris.
W. B. G. JACOBSEN* and N. H. G. JACOBSEN**
* P.O. Box 1178, White River 1240.
** Division of Nature Conservation, Private Bag X209, Pretoria 000 1 .
MS. received: 1987.06.02.
LAMIACEAE
RESUSCITATION OF SYNCOLOSTEMON RAMULOSUS E. MEY. EX BENTH.
Three closely related species of Syncolostemon , S.
densiflorus Benth., S. ramulosus E. Mey. ex Benth. and
S. rotundifolius E. Mey. ex Benth., were described by
Bentham ( 1838), all based on Drege specimens collected
in the Transkei during Dr Andrew Smith's expedition to
Natal in 1832.
In my treatments of the genus (Codd 1976, 1985), S.
densiflorus and S. rotundifolius were recognized as dis-
tinct species, well documented by modern material, but
5. ramulosus remained something of a mystery. In the
shape of the calyx teeth (probably the most reliable char-
acter for separating the three species, as indicated
below), S. ramulosus is somewhat intermediate between
the other two and, being nearer to S. densiflorus in this
respect, was placed under the latter species as a syno-
nym.
In recent years, as a result of thorough collecting in
the area adjoining the Umtamvuna River by Mr A. T. D.
Abbott, who farms near Port Edward, and Prof. A. E.
van Wyk of Pretoria University, it has become apparent
that this view is incorrect. My awareness of this was
alerted by two specimens collected in April 1986 by Mr
Abbott on the farm Clearwater near Port Edward, Nos
3101 and i/02, which he maintained were distinct spe-
cies, though both would run to S. rotundifolius in my
key. On closer examination. No. 3101 was found to
agree with the type material of S. rotundifolius whereas
No. 3102 matched the type material of S. ramulosus.
Certain other small differences were noted and it was
realised that the following specimens, previously in-
cluded in S. rotundifolius , were in fact 5. ramulosus ,
which should be regarded as a distinct species: Acocks
1333 f, Nicholson 1419 (from near Port Edward, Natal);
and Strey 8638 from Umtentu, Transkei). The following
are the main distinguishing characters.
S. rotundifolius. Shrub 0,8- 1,8 m tall. Leaf blade
obovate to subrotund, 6-15 x 4-12 mm. Inflorescence
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
93
medium-dense to lax; verticils 2-flowered. Calyx puber-
ulous to shortly glandular-pubescent; teeth deltoid, sub-
equal, 1,5-2 mm long. Corolla bright mauve or
magenta-pink to pink, 20-27 mm long, 15 mm wide at
the mouth; lower lip 8-10 mm long. Stamens exserted
by 10— 15 mm.
S. ramulosus. Shrub 0,6— 1,2 m tall. Leaf blade obo-
vate to rotund, 5-7 x 3,5-6 mm. Inflorescence
medium-dense; verticils (2-) 4-6-flowered. Calyx
glandular-hispidulous; teeth lanceolate-subulate 2-2,5
mm long, the uppermost tooth usually slightly shorter
and broader than the lower 4. Corolla lilac to pale
pinkish mauve or occasionally white, 16—20 mm long, 5
mm wide at the mouth; lower lip 3 mm long. Stamens
exserted by 5—6 mm.
S. densiflorus. Shrub 1—2,2 m tall. Leaf blade
broadly elliptic to broadly ovate or rotund, 5-15 x
4- 10 mm. Inflorescence dense; verticils 4-6-flowered,
Calyx glandular-hispidulous; teeth lanceolate-subulate,
2,5 — 3 mm long, the uppermost tooth usually shorter
than the lower 4. Corolla crimson to pink or rarely
whitish, 18 — 23 mm long, 8—12 mm wide at the mouth;
lower lip 5 mm long. Stamens exserted by 8— 10 mm.
REFERENCES
BENTHAM, G. 1838. In E. H. F. Meyer , Commentariorum de plantis
Africae australioris 2: 231 . Konigsberg.
CODD, L. E. 1976. The genus Syncolostemon. Bothalia 12: 21-27.
CODD, L. E. 1985. Syncolostemon. Flora of southern Africa 28,4:
185-191.
L. E. CODD
PORPIDIACEAE
A NEW SPECIES OF PORPIDIA FROM THE DRAKENSBERG
Porpidia afromontana Brusse, sp. nov.
Thallus crustosus, basalticola, fuscus, areolatus, ad 80
mm diametro, 150—800 yum crassus. Areolae 0,1 — 1,0
mm diametro, fuscae, marginibus albidis, non soredia-
tis. Prothallus ater. Stratum epinecrale hyalinum,
10—45 yu m crassum. Cortex superior 15 — 35 yum cras-
sus, paraplectenchymatus, cellulis 3, 5 -8,0 pm diame-
tro, hyalinus, sed supemis 5-8 pm badius. Stratum
gonidiale 40-60 pm crassum; algae 5-27 pm diame-
tro, Chlorococcaleae. Medulla alba, 50—650 pm crassa.
Apothecia atra, 0,2-0, 8 mm diametro, immersa, plana
vel concava. Excipulum reductum, 5—15 pm crassum,
interne et infeme hyalinum, supeme viridi-atrum et para-
plectenchymatum. Hypothecium hyalinum vel strami-
neum, 40—70 yum crassum, paraplectenchymatum, cel-
lulis 3-5 yum diametro. Hymenium hyalinum, 100 pm
altum; epihymenium atrum, 5—10 pm crassum, granu-
lare. Paraphyses graciles, septatae, ramosae et anasto-
mosantes, 1, 2-2,0 pm crassae, capitatae, capitibus
2,0— 3,0 pm crassis. Asci clavati, 80—90 x 25-30 pm,
tholis J+ perpallide caeruleis, cylindris axialibus J +
caeruleis (Figure 5). Ascosporae sextae vel octonae,
hyalinae, simplices, late ellipsoideae, halonatae, 17—22
x 8 — 1 1 ,5 pm. Pycnidia non visa. Thallus acidum con-
fluenticum continens.
TYPE. — Cape, 3028 (Matatiele): 65 km N of
Maclear, summit of Naude’s Nek, on basalt rocks on
summit plateau, in full sun, alt. 2 500 m (-CA). F.
Brusse 4590, 1986.01.26 (PRE, holo.; BM, COLO, E,
LD, UC, UPS, iso.). Figure 6.
Thallus crustose, on basalt, brown, areolate, to 80 mm
across, 150-800 gm thick. Areoles 0,1 -1,0 mm
across, brown, margins whitish, not sorediate. Prothal-
lus black. Epinecral zone hyaline, 10—45 yum thick.
Upper cortex 15-35 yum thick, paraplectenchymatous,
cells 3, 5-8,0 yum diam., hyaline, but upper 5-8 yum
reddish brown. Algal layer 40-60 yum thick; algae
5-27 yum diam., Chloroccocalean. Medulla white (or
rusty-coloured due to mineral inclusions from weather-
ing of basalt), 50—650 yum thick. Apothecia black.
FIGURE 5. — Porpidia afromontana Brusse, ascus and paraphyses. F.
Brusse 4590, holotype. Bar = 10 yxm.
94
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
FIGURE 6. — Porpidia afromontana Brusse, habit. F . Brusse 4590 ,
holotype. Scale in mm.
0,2-0, 8 mm across, immersed, flat or concave. Exciple
reduced (developed only on flanks), 5-15 /xm thick,
hyaline within and below, greenish black and paraplec-
tenchymatous above. Hypothecium hyaline or strami-
neous, 40-70 pm thick, paraplectenchymatous, cells
3-5 pm diam. Hymenium hyaline, 100 pm high; epihy-
menium black, 5-10 pm thick, granular. Paraphyses
slender, septate, branched and anastomosed, 1, 2-2,0
pm thick, capitate, heads 2-3 pm thick. Asci clavate,
six or eight-spored, 80-90 x 25-30 pm, tholus J +
very pale blue, with J+ blue axial cylinder (Figure 5).
Ascospores hyaline, simple, broadly ellipsoid, halonate,
17—22 x 8—11,5 pm. Pycnidia not seen. Chemistry:
confluence acid present.
Etymology: afromontana (Latin) = pertaining to, or
from African mountains, hence afromontane.
This new species is a typical Porpidia except for the
pale hypothecium, which makes it assignable to Poeltia-
ria Hertel (1984). However, this genus is based on a
pale, rather than a dark hypothecium, as is typical for
Porpidia, but this in itself, cannot be significant at the
generic level. The brown pigments produced in lichens
are probably all the products of oxidative coupling of
phenols derived from polyketides, similar to the 1,8-
dihydroxynaphthalene oxidative coupling demonstrated
in some ascomycetes and ascomycete anamorphs
(Wheeler 1983). The amount of genetic material (DNA)
involved in this pigment production is too limited to be
of significance at the generic level, and a single locus is
probably involved in its production. It is also possible
* Porpidia urbanskyana (Zahlbr.) Brusse, comb. nov. Basionym:
Lecidea urbanskyarui Zahlbr., Deutsche Siidpolar-Expedition
1901-1903 8: 38 (1906). Synonym: Poeltiaria urbanskyana (Zahlbr.)
Hertel, Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia 79: 432 (1984).
** Porpidia turgescens (Koerb.) Brusse, comb. nov. Basionym: Leci-
della turgescens Koerb., Abhandlungen der Schlesischen Gesellschaft
fur vaterlandische Cultur 2: 34 (1862). Synonym: Poeltiaria turgescens
(Koerb.) Hertel, Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia 79: 431 (1984).
that the phenomenon of a dark hypothecium, is simply a
question of control mechanisms, which control the ex-
pression of the brown pigment in a particular anatomical
region (in this case the hypothecium). For instance,
brown pigments are often expressed in cortical,
excipular, epihy menial, and hypothecial tissue, but not
in medullary and rarely in hymenial tissue.
Porpidia afromontana is closest to Porpidia
urbanskyana (Zahlbr.) Brusse*, but has a much thinner
exciple (5—15 pm) than the latter (40—60 pm\ Hertel
1984). The apothecia of P. afromontana are also sunken
in the areoles, whereas those of P. urbanskyana are
adnate and larger (to 1,2 mm across). The thallus of P.
afromontana is also much thicker (to 800 pm thick),
brown-pigmented, and contains confluentic acid,
whereas that of P. urbanskyana is thin (rarely thicker
than 100 pm), is grey-coloured (lacks brown pigments in
the upper cortex), and contains traces of stictic acid
(Hertel 1984).
The species of Porpidia with brown thalli have
recently been thoroughly revised by Schwab (1986) for
central and northern Europe, but these lichens all have
brown hypothecia, a character that is significant at the
species level. Porpidia has also received attention in
central, southern and eastern Asia, including the Hima-
laya mountain range (Hertel 1977).
Confluentic acid is well known in Porpidia, being
known in P. flavocoerulescens (Homem.) Hertel &
Schwab, P. tuberculosa (Sm.) Hertel & Knoph, P. tur-
gescens (Koerb.) Brusse** (with 2'-0-methylperlatolic
acid) and is also known in Xenolecia spadicomma (Nyl.)
Hertel, a lichen with a similar apothecial structure to P.
afromontana. Since pycnidiospores were not found in P.
afromontana, it is not possible to exclude the possibility
that it belongs to Xenolecia Hertel (1984).
At present Porpidia afromontana is known only from
the type locality, the summit of Naude’s Nek, at 2 500 m
altitude, in the Drakensberg, on basalt.
REFERENCES
HERTEL, H. 1977. Gesteinsbewohnende Arten der Sammelgattung
Lecidea (Lichenes) aus Zentral-, Ost- und Sudasien, Eine erste
Ubersicht. Khumbu Himal 6,3: 200-225.
HERTEL, H. 1984. Uber saxicole, lecideoide Flechten der Subantark-
tis. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia 79: 399-499.
SCHWAB, A. J. 1986. Rostfarbene Arten der Sammelgattung Lecidea
(Lecanorales). Revision der Arten Mittel- und Nordeuropas. Mit-
teilungen aus der Botanischen Staatssammlung, Miinchen 22:
221-476.
WHEELER, M. H. 1983. Comparisons of fungal melanin biosynthesis
in ascomycetous, imperfect and basidiomycetous fungi. Transac-
tions of the British Mycological Society 81, 1 : 29-36.
F. BRUSSE
MS. received: 1987.08.13.
SC HIZODISC US , A NEW PORPIDIOID LICHEN GENUS FROM THE DRAKENSBERG
Schizodiscus Brusse, gen. nov.
Thallus crustaceus, saxicola. Cortex superior para-
plectenchymatus, cellulis 2,5— 4,0 pm diametro. Algae
Chlorococcaleae. Apothecia atra, immersa. Excipulum et
hypothecium ut in Lecidea. Paraphyses simplices vel
furcatae, conglutinatae, septatae. Asci clavati, non-halo-
nati, tholis J+ caeruleis ut in iconem (Figura 7) illu-
stratis. Ascosporae octonae, hyalinae, simplices, ellip-
soideae, non-halonatae. Pycnidia immersa, globosa vel
oblonga. Pycnidiosporae acrogenae, bacillares, hyali-
nae, rigidae, rectae.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
95
TYPE. — Schizodiscus afroalpinus Brusse
Thallus crustose, saxicolous. Upper cortex paraplec-
tenchymatous, cells 2, 5-4,0 pm diam. Algae Chloro-
coccalean. Apothecia black, immersed. Exciple and
hypothecium as in Lecidea. Paraphyses simple or
branched, septate, conglutinate. Asci clavate, eight-
spored, non-gelatinized, tholus J+ blue as in Figure 7.
Ascospores hyaline, simple, ellipsoid, non-halonate.
Pycnidia immersed, spherical to globose. Pycnidio-
spores acrogenous, straight, hyaline, rigid rods.
Etymology: the generic name is derived from the
Greek ‘schizo’ meaning split and ‘discos’ meaning disc,
in allusion to the apothecia which develop fissures and
cracks with age.
FIGURE 7. — Schizodiscus afroalpinus Brusse,
ascus and paraphysis. F. Brusse 4523 , holo-
type. Bar = 10 jum.
Schizodiscus afroalpinus Brusse, sp. nov.
Thallus crustosus, saxicola, caesio-cinereus, usque ad
40 mm diametro, 0,2-1 mm crassus, continuus et
rimosus, vel rimoso-areolatus, vel interdum dispersus,
areolis (0,2-) 0, 5-4,0 mm diametro, planis vel inter-
dum convexis, isidiis sorediisque destitutis. Cortex supe-
rior 17-20 pm crassus, paraplectenchymatus, cellulis
2, 5-4,0 pm diametro. Stratum gonidiale 50-70 gm
crassum, algis chlorococcaleis, 5—15 pm diametro.
Medulla alba, J — , 150-800 pm crassa. Apothecia atra,
innata, interdum emergentia, plana, lecideina, usque ad
1,5 mm diametro, plerumque cum fissuris cincta,
primum integra deinde fissurata. Excipulum infeme
brunneum, circa 10 pm crassum, periclinate prosoplec-
tenchymatum, supeme circa 20 pm crassum, atrovirens,
paraplectenchymatum. Hypothecium stramineum vel
pallide badium, 50—100 pm crassum, granulis insper-
sum, paraplectenchymatum, cellulis 3,0— 5,5 //.m
diametro, supeme (subhymenium) cum guttulis insper-
sum. Hymenium hyalinum (vel pallide viride), 70-80
pm altum, J+ caeruleum, epihymenio fusco-brunnes-
centi. Paraphyses simplices vel furcatae, septatae,
ecapitatae, conglutinatae, lumenibus 1 — 1,5 pm crassis,
gelatinis J+ pallide caeruleis. Asci clavati vel subcylin-
drici, non-halonati, tholis J+ caeruleis ut in iconem
(Figura 7) illustratis. Ascosporae octonae, hyalinae, sim-
plices, ellipsoideae, ehalonatae, 10,0-17,5 x 6, 0-7, 5
pm. Pycnidia (in typo non visa) immersa, globosa vel
oblonga, saepe aggregata, 100-120 pm profunda,
70—100 /urn lata. Pycnidiosporae acrogenae, bacillares,
hyalinae, rectae, rigidae, 6,5-15 x 0,8 pm. Thallus
acidum 2'-0-methylperlatolicum solum continens.
TYPE. — 2828 (Bethlehem): 31 km S of Phuthadi-
tjhaba (Witsieshoek), summit of Western Buttress
(Mont-aux-Sources), on low basalt exposures near soil
near seepage areas, on gentle S slope on summit plateau,
alt. 3 080 m (-DB), F. Brusse 4523, 1986.01 .21 (PRE,
holo.; BM, LD, iso.). Figure 8.
FIGURE 8. — Schizodiscus afroalpinus Brusse, habit. F. Brusse 4523 ,
holotype. Scale in mm.
Thallus crustose, saxicolous, pale blue-grey, up to 40
mm across, 0,2- 1 mm thick, continuous and rimose, to
rimose-areolate, to sometimes dispersed, areoles (0,2-)
0, 5-4,0 mm across, flat or sometimes convex, lacking
isidia and soredia. Upper cortex 17-20 pm thick, para-
plectenchymatous, cells 2, 5-4,0 yam diam. Algal layer
50-70 yu,m, algae chlorococcalean, 5-15 pm diam.
Medulla white, J-, 150-800 pm thick. Apothecia
black, innate sometimes emergent, flat, lecideine, up to
1,5 mm diam., often surrounded by a fissure, at first
entire then becoming fissured (starting from the interior,
not from the margins). Exciple brown, periclinally pro-
soplectenchymatous and about 10 pm thick below, be-
coming dark green, paraplectenchymatous and about 20
pm thick above (at the flanks of the hymenium). Hypo-
thecium stramineous or pale reddish brown, 50- 100 pm
thick, granular inspersed, paraplectenchymatous, cells
96
3,0— 5,5 /x m diam., becoming inspersed with ‘oil-drop-
lets’ above (in the subhymenial zone). Hymenium hya-
line (or pale green in thick sections), 70-80 /xm high,
J+ blue, epihymenium fuscous brown. Paraphyses
simple to branched, septate, ecapitate, conglutinate, lu-
mens 1 — 1,5 /xm thick, gelatin J+ pale blue. Asci clavate
to subcylindrical, eight- spored, non-halonate (no gelati-
nous sheath or excess present), tholus J+ blue as illus-
trated in Figure 7. Ascospores hyaline, simple, ellipsoid,
non-halonate, 10,0—17,5 x 6,0— 7,5 /xm. Pycnidia (not
seen in holotype) immersed, globose or oblong, often
aggregated (sometimes in darkened verrucae), 100-120
/xm deep, 70—100 /xm wide. Pycnidiospores acroge-
nous, hyaline, rigid, straight rods or needles, 6,5-15 x
0,8 /xm. Chemistry : only 2'-0-methylperlatolic acid pre-
sent.
This new lichen is characterized by a porpidioid tholus
reaction with Lugol’s iodine solution, where most of the
tholus is very pale blue, almost colourless, with a narrow
cylinder of strongly amyloid material in the axis of the
tholus (Figure 7). Schizodiscus differs from the genera in
the Porpidiaceae in the lack of a halo around the asco-
spores, which, besides Clauzadea, are also smaller. The
recently described genus, Clauzadea Hafelln. & Bellem.
(Hafellner 1984), typified by C. monticola (Ach. in
Schaer.) Hafelln. & Bellem., is similar to Schizodiscus ,
but has a large gelatinous excess (sheath, halo) around
the ascus, which is absent in Schizodiscus. The asco-
spores in Clauzadea are reported to be halonate when
young (Hafellner 1984), but this was difficult to confirm
with the century-old material available. Very young as-
cospores ruptured from their asci by external mechanical
means, sometimes carry a certain amount of ascoplasma
with them. The ascospores of Schizodiscus are clearly
non-halonate. The hypothecium in Clauzadea is an even
reddish brown colour, and the paraplectenchyma is
larger-celled than in Schizodiscus. The exciple in Clau-
zadea is slightly deeper reddish brown, is well devel-
oped, and is composed of radially arranged paraplecten-
chyma, with large cells. The exciple of Schizodiscus is
very reduced, being clearly discernible only on the
flanks of the hymenium, and is composed of smaller-
celled paraplectenchyma, which is aeruginose-black in
this region. The hypothecium of Schizodiscus has a pale
brown wash to it, and is not solidly reddish brown as in
Clauzadea.
Schizodiscus resembles Clauzadea immersa (Web.)
Hafelln. & Bellem. more closely in excipular characters,
but C. immersa also has a clear gelatinous excess to the
ascus. The asci of Schizodiscus do not contribute to the
gelatinous matrix of the hymenium, this being produced
solely by the paraphyses.
Nothoporpidia Hertel (1984) is characterized by a tho-
lus which has both a strongly amyloid, axial, narrow
cylinder (as in Porpidia) and an amyloid crescent at the
apex (as in Lecidea), but I have not examined material of
this lichen. The additional crescent at the apex of the
tholus, may not be very significant in this case, as this
has also been observed in the tholus of Porpidia macro-
carpa (DC.) Hertel & Schwab (Schwab: 268, fig. 13,
1986). The exciple is reported to be strongly developed
and hyaline within, with a deep fuscous brown hypothe-
cium, whereas that of Schizodiscus is weakly developed,
with a pale brown hypothecium. The only species, N.
irrubens (Zahlbr.) Hertel, contains norstictic acid (Hertel
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
1984), whereas S. afroalpinus contains 2'-0-methylper-
latolic acid.
Another Porpidiaceous lichen worth mentioning in
connection with this new genus is Porpidia skottsber-
giana Hertel, with small ascospores, similar in size to
those of Schizodiscus afroalpinus. Despite the size, the
ascospores were reported to be clearly halonate, and the
author of the species (Hertel 1984), expressed no doubt
about its generic affinity.
The lack of gelatinized ascospores and asci leads one
to look to the Psoraceae for relatives. However, the
tholus background to the narrow strongly amyloid cylin-
der, is clearly blue (amyloid) and not pale, as in the
Porpidiaceae and Schizodiscus. The only crustose genus,
Protoblastenia (Zahlbr.) Stnr., is characterized by
coarse, but thin-walled, loose paraphyses, which are
often branched and anastomosed, and always ecapitate.
The production of monomeric anthraquinones is also
characteristic for Protoblastenia.
This new lichen is presently known from high alti-
tudes in the Drakensberg from Mont-aux-Sources in the
north to Naude’s Nek in the south-west, on basalt in or
near seepage.
NATAL. — 2828 (Bethlehem): 31 km S of Phuthaditjhaba (Witsies-
hoek), summit of Western Buttress (Mont-aux-Sources), on low basalt
exposures near soil near seepage areas, on gentle S slope on summit
plateau, alt. 3 080 m (-DB), F. Brusse 4523 , 1986.01.21 (PRE,
holo.; BM, LD, iso.); 32 km S of Phuthaditjhaba (Witsieshoek), sum-
mit of Mont-aux-Sources at Tugela falls, on N bank of Tugela River,
on basalt in low near- vertical bank, in seepage zone, alt. 2 960 m
(-DD), F. Brusse 4530, 1986.01.21 (BM, PRE). 3028 (Matatiele): 65
km N of Maclear, summit of Naude’s Nek, on basalt exposures nearly
level with ground, in seepage on summit plateau, alt. 2 500 m (-CA),
F. Brusse 4593, 1986.01 .26 (BM, COLO, E, LD, PRE, UC, UPS).
SPECIMENS OF OTHER SPECIES EXAMINED
Clauzadea immersa (Weber) Hafelln. & Bellem.
ITALY. — 4611: An einem Kalkfelsen in der Matreier Grnbe ober
der Waldrast, 6000', Matrei in Tyrol. Arnold s.n.. 22 Juli 1869 (Ar-
nold, Lichenes Exsiccati 360b; PRE CH2779).
Clauzadea monticola (Ach. in Schaer.) Hafelln. & Bel-
lem.
GERMANY. — 4811: An Gerollsteinen in einer Waldkiesgmbe
ostlich ober der Reismiihle bei Gauting, Miinchen. Arnold s.n., 26 Juli
1894 (Arnold, Lichenes Monacenses Exsiccati 354; PRECH2643).
Protoblastenia rupestris (Scop.) Stnr.
GERMANY. — 4811: Auf Hohlziegeln der Kirchhofmauer in Gra-
felfing bei Miinchen. Arnold s.n. ,9 November 1890 (Arnold, Lichenes
Monacenses Exsiccati 105; PRE CH2423).
REFERENCES
HAFELLNER, J. 1984. Studien in Richtung einer natiirlicheren
Gliederung der Sammelfamilien Lecanoraceae und Lecideaceae.
Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia 79: 241-371.
HERTEL, H. 1984. Uber saxicole, lecideoide Flechten der Subantark-
tis. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia 79: 399-499.
SCHWAB, A. J. 1986. Rostfarbene Alien der Sammelgattung Lecidea
(Lecanorales), Revision der Arten Mittel-und Nordeuropas. Mii-
teilungen aus der bolanischen Staatssammlung, Miinchen 22:
221-476.
F. BRUSSE
MS. received: 1987.08.13.
Bothalia 18,1:97-99(1988)
The cigarette beetle Lasioderma serricorne (F.) (Coleoptera: Anobii-
dae): a serious herbarium pest
E. RETIEF* and A. NICHOLAS*
Keywords: cigarette beetle, curation, herbarium pests, herbarium specimens, Lasioderma serricorne
ABSTRACT
The herbarium pest Lasioderme serricorne (F.) is described and illustrated, and aspects of its life cycle and eradication
are discussed.
UITTREKSEL
Die herbariumplaag Lasioderme serricorne (F.) word beskryf en geillustreer, en aspekte van sy lewensiklus en
uitroeiing word bespreek.
INTRODUCTION
One serious curation problem in herbaria is the protec-
tion of specimens from damage by insects. In the past,
various animal pests have occurred in the National Her-
barium, Pretoria (PRE): cigarette beetles, cockroaches,
rats and fish moths. Of these, Lasioderme serricorne
(F.), the cigarette beetle or tobacco beetle, has caused
the most severe damage to herbarium specimens. Re-
cently, infested material received from a collector and
damage done to specimens in the cupboards again drew
attention to this beetle.
DISCUSSION
The insect
Lasioderme serricorne (Fabricius) was first described
in France in 1792 from specimens collected in America,
but the oldest record of occurrence of the tobacco beetle
comes from Egypt, remains of the insect having been
found in the tomb of Tutankhamen. These beetles are
therefore probably indigenous to Egypt, and they have
scarcely altered morphologically in the 3 500 years that
have elapsed (Reed & Vinzant 1942). The insect has
gained a wide distribution through commerce and is
nowadays found throughout the tropical and subtropical
parts of the world.
The adult beetle (Figure 1) is small (2, 0-3, 7 mm),
reddish brown, and its head is retracted under the front
part of the body. Distinguishing characteristics include
the smooth elytra and serrate antennae (Croat 1978). The
similar drugstore beetle, Stegobium paniceum (L.),
which is also extremely common and also occurs on a
wide range of products, possesses distinctly grooved ely-
tra and clubbed antennae. Cigarette beetles are slow fly-
ers and can easily be spotted when flying.
L. serricorne females oviposit directly onto dried ma-
terial. The eggs are pearly white and elongated and hatch
in 6-8 days. The larvae, ± 3 mm long, are C-shaped,
greyish white and thinly covered with fine brown hairs
(Figure 2). When growth is completed, the larva trans-
* Botanical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and Water
Supply, Private Bag X 101 , Pretoria 000 1 .
MS. received: 1987.05.07.
FIGURE 1. — Scanning Electron Micrograph of a mature cigarette
beetle, Lasioderma serricorne, X 50.
FIGURE 2. — Drawing of a larva of a cigarette beetle, Lasioderma
serricorne, x 90.
98
forms into an inactive pupa and emerges a fully devel-
oped beetle in about 7 days in summer and 14—18 days
in the cooler weather of spring and autumn (Reed &
Vinzant 1942).
The complete life cycle of L. serricorne spans about
45—70 days, and 3-6 generations occur per year, de-
pending on the availability of food, as well as tempera-
ture and humidity (Edwards et al. 1980). Huge popula-
tions of L. serricorne can build up very quickly — a pro-
tected breeding pair produced 2 000 offspring in four
months (Howe 1957)— and infestations and damage can
reach alarming proportions before adults are spotted. L.
serricorne can breed on a wide variety of commodities
including herbarium specimens, insecticides containing
py rethrum, animal matter such as dried insects and dried
fish, leather, cloth, paper and books (Lever 1945, Mos-
sop 1950, Howe 1957). Symbiotic yeasts, which occur
intracellularly in mycetomes at the junction of the fore-
and mid-gut, supply B-group vitamins in significant
amounts and make it possible for L. serricorne to subsist
on foods very low in vitamins of that group (Pant &
Fraenkel 1950). The yeasts also supply their hosts with
sterols, a necessary constituent of their diet. In the ab-
sence of any other food the newly hatched larva may eat
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
the egg shell. They are negatively phototropic and will
enter very small holes in search of food (Howe 1957),
and evidence at PRE also suggests that they can find
their way into tightly closed cabinets. Experiments have
shown that the tobacco beetle can exist at temperatures
between 2 °C and 36 °C (Powell 1931); however, the
beetle will tolerate a much wider range in temperature,
and all stages of the life cycle may survive temperatures
below 2 °C. According to Powell (1931), the greatest
numbers of tobacco beetles complete their life cycles at
humidities of about 75 per cent; humidities above 90 per
cent are unfavourable because of the attack by fungal and
bacterial diseases. It is likely that only the eggs and
young larvae are vulnerable to low humidity and that the
later stages may survive several months at low humidity
(Howe 1957).
Damage
Both the adult and larval stages of the life cycle are
capable of feeding (Lefkovitch 1963). The most severe
damage is done to the flowers of herbarium specimens,
although leaves and stems are also eaten (Figure 3).
Seeds inside fruits of exposed material are usually se-
verely attacked. Plant parts are turned into a mixture of
dust and faeces (Figure 4).
FIGURE 3. — Herbarium specimen,
Senecio sp., severely damaged
by cigarette beetle, x 0,8.
FIGURE 4. — Herbarium specimen,
Senecio sp., damaged by ciga-
rette beetle. Plant parts have
been turned into a mixture of
dust and faeces, x 1,5.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
Eradication
Two basic approaches are usually taken to control
pests in herbaria, namely 1, the sterile entry approach,
i.e. building closure coupled with humidity control, tem-
perature control and sterile entry techniques; and 2, fu-
migation, i.e. the use of short or long duration fumigants
or poisons in direct association with the herbarium speci-
mens (Croat 1978). At present in PRE all incoming ma-
terial is treated in the service room by freezing (deep
freeze temperature averages -6 °C) for two days or by
heating in a microwave oven for six minutes (100 mm
pile) to kill any insects present. The herbarium and asso-
ciated rooms are fumigated once a year and paradichlo-
robenzene has been put into herbarium cabinets regularly
to act as a repellent. However, because of a recent out-
break of cigarette beetle, present insect pest control
measures at PRE are undergoing critical examination,
and new control measures are to be tested. Recent out-
breaks of the beetle were isolated and the contaminated
specimens either microwaved or frozen. Some of the
contaminated cupboards were fumigated using Vapona*
strips (dichlorvos), while others were sprayed with Bay-
gon knockdown* spray. This is a ‘dry’ spray that can be
sprayed directly onto mounted specimens without mark-
ing or damaging them, the active ingredients being
dichlorvos, a pyrethroid (tetramethin) and a synergist
(piperonylbutoxide). These measures have proved
successful in controlling the infestations. An initial treat-
ment with commercially available fumigating tablets
proved unsuccessful.
CONCLUSION
Herbarium specimens and their associated mounting
boards, species covers, genus covers and wooden cabi-
nets are all susceptible to attack by insect pests. Infesta-
tions that go unnoticed or untreated can cause extensive,
irreversible damage. Collections that have taken time,
effort and money to compile can be completely de-
stroyed. No herbarium can afford to let this happen.
* Mention of a trade name does not imply its approval to the exclusion
of other products.
99
especially when historically valuable collections and
type specimens are involved. The control and eradication
of a pest like L. serricorne in herbaria is therefore of
utmost importance to curators.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank Mr R. Oberprieler of
the Plant Protection Research Institute, Pretoria; Dr S.
Endrody-Younga of the Transvaal Museum, Pretoria;
and Mr P. Fourie of Bayer, South Africa’s Johannesburg
office, for assistance given during the preparation of this
paper. Our thanks also go to Mrs S. M. Perold and Mrs
A. Romanowski of the Botanical Research Institute, Pre-
toria for help given with the SEM and photographs re-
spectively.
REFERENCES
CROAT, T. B. 1978. Survey of herbarium problems. Taxon 27:
203-218.
EDWARDS, S. R., BELL, B. M. & KING, M. E. (eds) 1980. Pest
control in museums: a status report. The Association of System-
atics Collection, U.S. A.
HOWE, R. W. 1957. A laboratory study of the Cigarette Beetle, La-
sioderma serricorne (F.) (Col., Anobiidae) with a critical review
of the literature on its biology. Bulletin of Entomological Re-
search 48: 9-56.
LEFKOVITCH, L. P. 1963. Census studies on unrestricted popula-
tions of Lasioderma serricorne (F.) (Coleoptera: Anobiidae).
Journal of Animal Ecology 32: 221-231.
LEVER, R. J. A. W. 1945. Entomological Notes. 1. Food preferences
of some beetles for stored products. Agricultural Journal of Fiji
16:8.
MOSSOP, M. C. 1950. Summary of annual report of the Chief Ento-
mologist for the year ended 31st Dec. 1949. The Rhodesia Agri-
cultural Journal 47: 331-338.
PANT, N. C. & FRAENKEL, G. 1950. The function of the symbiotic
yeasts of two insect species, Lasioderma serricorne F. and Stego-
bium (Sitodrepa) paniceum L. Science 1 12: 498-500.
POWELL, T. E. 1931. An ecological study of the Tobacco Beetle,
Lasioderma serricorne Fabr. with special reference to its life his-
tory and control. Ecological Monographs 1, 3: 380-393.
REED, W. D. & VINZANT, J. P. 1942. Control of insects attacking
stored tobacco and tobacco products. United States Department
of Agriculture, Circular No. 635.
,
Bothalia 18,1: 101-104(1988)
Leaf anatomy of the South African Danthonieae (Poaceae). XVI. The
genus U rochlaena
R. P. ELLIS*
Keywords: Danthonieae, leaf anatomy, Poaceae, U rochlaena
ABSTRACT
The leaf blade anatomy of Urochlaena pusilla Nees is described and illustrated. The transectional anatomy is non-
Kranz with diffuse but uniformly distributed chlorenchyma. The abaxial epidermis has dome-shaped stomata, dumbbell-
shaped silica bodies, elongated finger-like microhairs, and cushion-based macrohairs may or may not be present. This type
of arundinoid anatomy closely resembles that of Tribolium Desv., Chaetobromus Nees, Schismus Beauv., and certain
species of Pentaschistis Stapf. Urochlaena pusilla is very similar to Tribolium utriculosum (Nees) Renv. in leaf anatomy
and these two species appear to be closely related.
UITTREKSEL
Die blaaranatomie van Urochlaena pusilla Nees word beskryf en geillustreer. Die anatomie in dwarssnee is nie-Kranz
met ’n verspreide maar eweredige samestelling van die chlorenchiem. Die abaksiale epidermis het koepelvormige huid-
mondjies, murgbeenvormige silikaliggaampies, langwerpige, vingeragtige mikrohare, en makrohare met baie gespesiali-
seerde epidermisselle aan die basis kan aanwesig of afwesig wees. Hierdie tipe anatomie is kenmerkend van die Arundineae
en toon ooreenkomste met die van Tribolium Desv., Chaetobromus Nees, Schismus Beauv., en sekere species van Pentas-
chistis Stapf. Wat blaaranatomie betref, is Urochlaena pusilla baie soortgelyk aan Tribolium utriculosum (Nees) Renv. en
hierdie twee spesies blyk nou verwant te wees.
INTRODUCTION
Urochlaena Nees is a monospecific genus containing
the single species U. pusilla Nees, a small annual char-
acterized by a dense spike-like panicle embraced by the
inflated uppermost leaf sheath. At maturity the culm
disarticulates at the uppermost node, complete with the
inflorescence and modified upper sheath, and this whole
structure acts as a dispersal unit (Chippindall 1955; Clay-
ton & Renvoize 1986).
Urochlaena is endemic to the Western Mountain Ka-
roo and the Succulent Karoo of the Vanrhynsdorp, Nieu-
woudtville and Calvinia Districts of the Cape Province of
South Africa. This restricted distribution range is typi-
fied by poor soils, low winter rainfall (150 mm or less
per annum), and a low karroid dwarf shrub vegetation
with very few perennial grasses (Acocks 1975).
The classification of Urochlaena has been somewhat
inconsistent during the last 30 years. It was initially
placed in the Eragrosteae (Chippindall 1955) but its
relationships are now considered to lie with the Arundi-
noideae. Loxton (1976) and Watson etal. (1986) include
Urochlaena in the Danthonieae and Clayton & Renvoize
(1986) place it in the Arundineae in which tribe the Dan-
thonieae are included.
Urochlaena pusilla appears to be most closely related
to Tribolium utriculosum (Nees) Renv. (= Lasiochloa
utriculosa Nees) (Chippindall 1955; Clayton & Renvoize
1986). Both are small annuals from the drier, north-
western parts of the winter rainfall region, with T. utri-
culosum extending further northwards into Namaqua-
land. T. utriculosum always has hairy leaf blades but
those of Urochlaena pusilla are either hairy or glabrous
except at the bearded sheath mouth (Chippindall 1955).
* Botanical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and Water
Supply , Private Bag X 1 0 1 , Pretoria 000 1 .
MS. received: 1987.10.20.
Little information is available on the leaf anatomy of
Urochlaena. De Wet (1960) notes that the anatomy is
festucoid but that the epidermis is panicoid. Watson et
al. (1986) note that the anatomy is C3 without arm and
fusoid cells. The microhairs are of the panicoid type,
being linear in shape, and the silica bodies are also of the
panicoid type, being dumbbell-shaped. It is the purpose
of this paper to describe and illustrate the leaf blade
anatomy of Urochlaena and to compare its structure with
that of the other South African danthonioid grass spe-
cies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plants of Urochlaena pusilla were collected in the
field in the Nieuwoudtville and Vanrhynsdorp Districts.
Herbarium voucher specimens were prepared for verifi-
cation by the National Herbarium (PRE) where they are
housed. Leaf segments were immediately fixed in FA A
(Johansen 1940).
Transverse sections, 10 pm thick, were prepared after
desilicification in 30 % hydrofluoric acid (Breakwell
1914), dehydration following the method of Feder &
O’Brien (1968) and embedding in Tissue Prep (Fischer
Scientific). The sections were stained in safranin and fast
green (Johansen 1940). The manual scraping method of
Metcalfe (1960) was used to prepare scrapes of the ab-
axial epidermis. The anatomical structure was recorded
photographically using a Reicherdt Univar microscope
and Ilford Pan F film.
In the anatomical descriptions which follow, the stan-
dardized terminology of Ellis ( 1976, 1979) will be used,
together with the following abbreviations:
vb/s — vascular bundle/s
1 'vb/s — first order vascular bundle/s
2’ vb/s — second order vascular bundle/s
3 'vb/s — third order vascular bundle/s
ibs — inner bundle sheath; mestome sheath
obs — outer bundle sheath; parenchyma sheath
102
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
Specimens examined :
Urochlaena pusilla
CAPE. — 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): Vanrhynsdorp (-DA), Ellis 5346,
5347. 31 19 (Calvinia): Pakhuis Pass, 61 km N of Clanwilliam (-CA),
Ellis 1724 ; Botterkloof Pass, 42 km N of Clanwilliam (-CD), Ellis
2449, 4629.
ANATOMICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE GENUS UROCHLAENA
Leaf in transverse section
Outline: open, either expanded or variously inrolled,
U-shaped (Figures 1 & 2); blade narrow (± 2 mm wide)
and ± 200 gm thick. Ribs and furrows: rounded adaxial
ribs present overall vbs (Figures 1 & 2); furrows shallow
and wide (Figure 3). Abaxial surface without undula-
tions associated with the vbs. Median vascular bundle:
no structurally distinct midrib present (Figures 1 & 2).
Vascular bundle arrangement: 3 l’vbs in leaf section; 2
3’vbs between consecutive l’vbs; no 2’vbs. All vbs lo-
cated in the centre of the blade (Figures 3 & 4). Vascular
bundle description: 1’ and 3’ vbs rounded although 3’vbs
may tend to be angular in outline (Figure 4); phloem
adjoins ibs; metaxylem vessels with very narrow lumens,
inconspicuous and less than half the diameter of the obs
cells (Figure 4). Vascular bundle sheaths: obs round,
complete, with no extensions; cells very small, the lar-
gest being abaxially located (Figure 4); irregular in size,
with thin walls and contain small, unspecialized chloro-
plasts. Ibs entire, without thickened secondary walls.
Sclerenchyma: small adaxial strands associated with all
vbs (Figure 3); those of the 1 ’vbs larger than those of the
3’vbs which consist of only 2 or 3 fibres; abaxial girders
associated with the l’vbs only; trapezoidal in shape (Fig-
ure 4). Minute sclerenchyma cap in leaf margin (Figure
3). Fibres not lignified. Mesophyll: chlorenchyma non-
radiate with no pattern of arrangement (Figure 4); diffu-
sely arranged with many air spaces; the chlorenchyma
cells parenchymatous, rather large but irregular in size
and shape; lateral cell count greater than four. No colour-
less cells present. Adaxial epidermal cells: groups of
small bulliform cells located at the bases of the furrows;
occupy less than / of the leaf thickness; epidermal cells
thin-walled; few prickles associated with the adaxial ribs
(Figure 2). Abaxial epidermal cells: thin-walled, slightly
inflated with a thin cuticle; no epidermal appendages
visible.
Abaxial epidermis in surface view
Intercostal long cells: elongate rectangular; anticlinal
walls unthickened and slightly to moderately undulating
(Figures 6 & 8); cell shape and size constant throughout
intercostal zones (Figures 5 & 7); long cells adjoin one
another or separated by single short cells (Figures 5 &
7). Stomata: dome-shaped subsidiary cells (Figures
5-8); either evenly distributed throughout intercostal
zones in the hairy specimens (Figures 7 & 8) or in 1 or 2
rows laterally situated in the intercostal zones in speci-
mens lacking macrohairs (Figures 5 & 6); stomatal files
separated by more than one file of intercostal long cells;
one interstomatal long cell between successive stomata.
Intercostal short cells: solitary, tall and narrow cork cells
present between long cells (Figure 5); common but not
present between all adjoining long cells. Papillae: ab-
sent. Prickles: absent. Microhairs: bicellular hairs com-
mon and conspicuous; basal and distal cells about equal
FIGURES 1-4. — Leaf transactions of Urochlaena pusilla. 1, Ellis 2449, slightly infolded outline, x 160; 2, Ellis 1724, inrolled outline, x
160; 3-4, Ellis 2449: 3, lateral part of lamina showing mesophyll and vascular bundle arrangement, X 250; 4, detail of vascular bundles
and diffuse chlorenchyma, x 400.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
103
FIGURES 5-8. — Abaxial epidermis of Urochlaena pusilla. 5-6, Ellis 2449'. 5, costal and intercostal zones showing stomatal distribution, x
160; 6, interference contrast showing dumbbell-shaped silica bodies, stomata and intercostal long cells, x 400. 7-8, Ellis 1724 : 7,
macrohairs with cushion bases, x 250; 8, detail of macrohair bases, microhairs and silica bodies, X 400.
in length, both cells elongated, finger-like, the hair
length being about twice that of the stomatal complexes
(Figure 8); located between long cells, particularly in the
central files of the intercostal zones. Macrohairs: either
present (Figures 7 & 8) or absent (Figures 5 & 6), unicel-
lular, flexible with raised cushion bases of many specia-
lized epidermal cells (Figure 8); common in intercostal
zones only. Silica bodies: short dumbbell-shaped bodies
with wide central portions and rounded ends predomi-
nate (Figures 6 & 8); somewhat irregular in shape; con-
fined to costal zones; granules present in silica bodies.
Costal zones: silica cells alternating with short costal
cells (Figures 6 & 8); files with silica cells alternate with
files of elongated, rectangular costal long cells; costal
zones of 3, 5 or 7 files.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
The leaf anatomy, as described here, agrees with the
anatomical details given by De Wet ( 1960). The transec-
tional anatomy of Urochlaena is typically ‘festucoid’
whereas the abaxial epidermis is panicoid in several re-
spects. The outer bundle sheath consists of a single layer
of small, inconspicuous parenchyma cells which do not
contain specialized chloroplasts. The chlorenchyma is
uniformly and diffusely distributed throughout the meso-
phyll between the bundles, with no definite pattern of
arrangement and with a lateral cell count greater than
four. This structure is typical of the non-Kranz anatomy
of the pooid grasses and Urochlaena undoubtedly is C3
as reported by Watson et al. (1985). The abaxial epider-
mis, on the other hand, differs significantly from the
pooid type. Microhairs are present, the silica bodies are
dumbbell-shaped and not nodular, the long cells have
sinuous and not straight walls and the stomata are dome-
shaped and not parallel-sided. No pooid grass is known
to possess microhairs (Watson et al. 1985) and those of
Urochlaena are of the panicoid type, being elongated
finger-like. The leaf anatomy, therefore, indicates arun-
dinoid affinities and is in full agreement with the classifi-
cation of the genus in the Arundineae (Clayton & Ren-
voize 1986).
The anatomy of Urochlaena , with a uniformly distri-
buted and diffuse chlorenchyma of typical parenchyma
cells with large intercellular air spaces and an epidermis
with stomata and microhairs, resembles that of some
other danthonioid genera from South Africa. Examples
are Tribolium Desv., Chaetobromus Nees, Schismus
Beauv., Karroochloa Conert & Tiirpe and some species
of Pentaschistis Stapf. The anatomy of these taxa differs
significantly from other Cape danthonioid genera such as
Merxmuellera Conert, Pentameris Beauv., Pseudopen-
tameris Conert and other Pentaschistis species. All these
taxa have acicular leaves in which the chlorenchyma
consists of small isodiametric cells which are compactly
arranged with very small air spaces. The abaxial epider-
mis also usually lacks stomata and microhairs, and zona-
tion is not evident. This latter type of anatomy has been
described in most of the previous papers of this series
(Ellis 1980a, 1980b, 1983, 1985a, 1985b, 1985c, 1986).
These two different anatomical types appear to be as-
sociated with differing ecological conditions. Dantho-
nioid grasses with acicular leaves and compact meso-
phyll are all mountain fynbos species growing in oligo-
trophic soils derived from Table Mountain Sandstone.
The unique vegetation of this veld type is characterized
104
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
by sclerophyllous leaves, and this anatomical type may
reflect an equivalent response by these grass taxa to these
particular environmental conditions. Urochlaena and the
other danthonioid grasses with diffuse mesophyll, on the
other hand, favour more fertile soils, such as those of the
lowland fynbos and Renosterveld, those derived from
granite in the Namaqualand region and several of the
Karoo veld types. The Mediterranean pooid exotics,
which have a very similar transectional anatomy, have
also colonized this latter type of environment. Among
danthonioids it is only in taxa with the latter type of
anatomy that annuals occur, Urochlaena being an exam-
ple.
Although the leaf anatomy of these two ecological
groupings of danthonioid grasses is distinct, it is difficult
to ascribe phylogenetic significance to the differences.
Pentaschistis is the only genus which includes both ana-
tomical types and which has species occurring in both
these environments. However, the taxonomy of Penta-
schistis is very poorly understood and it would be unwise
to draw phylogenetic conclusions from these observa-
tions. These two different environments, however, may
have exserted diverging evolutionary pressures on these
two groups of danthonioid grasses; the relationships of
Urochlaena may therefore reasonably be sought among
danthonoid grasses with diffuse mesophyll.
Indeed, the leaf anatomy of Urochlaena pusilla re-
sembles that of Tribolium utriculosum and T. echinatum
(Thunb.) Renv. very closely indeed. Both always have
prominent cushion-based macrohairs which are often
also present on U. pusilla. In all other respects the leaf
anatomy of these taxa is virtually identical and their affi-
nities appear to lie with each other.
This conclusion based solely on anatomy, is corrobo-
rated by morphological indications. Chippindall (1955)
and Clayton & Renvoize (1986) suggest that U. pusilla
and T. utriculosum are closely related because both have
tubercle-based hairs as well as capitate hairs on the
glumes and lemmas. In T. echinatum the hairs of the
glumes are slender and tapering. T. utriculosum has the
inflorescence partly enclosed in the uppermost leaf
sheath, a condition developed further in U. pusilla.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank Prof. H. T. Clifford of the Uni-
versity of Queensland and Mr L. Watson of the Austra-
lian National University for critical reading of the ma-
nuscript. The technical assistance of Mrs H. Ebertsohn,
photographic assistance of Mrs A. Romanowski and typ-
ing of Mrs M. van der Merwe is gratefully acknow-
ledged.
REFERENCES
ACOCKS, J. P. H. 1975. Veld types of South Africa, 2nd edn.
Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 40: 1-127.
BREAKWELL, E. 1914. A study of the leaf anatomy of some species
of the genus Andropogon (Gramineae). Proceedings of the Lin-
nean Society of New South Wales 39: 385-394.
CHIPPINDALL, L. K. A. 1955. In D. Meredith, The grasses and
pastures of South Africa. Central News Agency, Johannesburg.
CLAYTON, W. D. & RENVOIZE, S. 1986. Genera Graminum,
grasses of the World. Kew Bulletin Additional Series XIII: 1-389.
DE WET, J. M. J. 1960. Leaf anatomy in six South African grass
genera. Bothalia 7: 299-301.
ELLIS, R. P. 1976. A procedure for standardizing comparative leaf
anatomy in the Poaceae. I. The leaf blade as viewed in transverse
section. Bothalia 12: 65-109.
ELLIS, R. P. 1979. A procedure for standardizing comparative leaf
anatomy in the Poaceae. II. The epidermis as seen in surface
view. Bothalia 12: 641-672.
ELLIS, R. P. 1980a. Leaf anatomy of the South African Danthonieae
(Poaceae). II. Merxmuellera disticha. Bothalia 13: 185-189.
ELLIS, R. P. 1980b. Leaf anatomy of the South African Danthonieae
(Poaceae). III. Merxmuellera stricta. Bothalia 13: 191-198.
ELLIS, R. P. 1983. Leaf anatomy of the South African Danthonieae
(Poaceae). VIII. Merxmuellera decora , M. lupulina and M. rufa.
Bothalia: 14: 197-203.
ELLIS, R. P. 1985a. Leaf anatomy of the South African Danthonieae
(Poaceae). X. Pseudopentameris. Bothalia 15: 561-566.
ELLIS, R. P. 1985b. Leaf anatomy of the South African Danthonieae
(Poaceae). XL Pentameris longiglumis and Pentameris sp. nov.
Bothalia 15: 567-571.
ELLIS, R. P. 1985c. Leaf anatomy of the South African Danthonieae
(Poaceae). XIII. Pentameris macrocalycina and P. obtusifolia.
Bothalia 15: 579-585.
ELLIS, R. P. 1986. Leaf anatomy of the South African Danthonieae
(Poaceae). XIV. Pentameris dregeana. Bothalia 16: 235-241.
FEDER, N. & O'BRIEN, O. P. 1968 Plant microtechnique: some
principles and new methods. American Journal of Botany 55:
123-142.
JOHANSEN, D. A. 1940. Plant microtechnique. McGraw-Hill, New
York.
LOXTON, A. E. 1976. InR. A. Dyer, The genera of southern African
flowering plants, Vol. 2. Government Printer, Pretoria.
METCALFE, C. R. 1960. Anatomy of the Monocotyledons. I. Grami-
neae. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
WATSON, L., CLIFFORD, H. T. & DALLWITZ, M. J. 1985. The
classification of the Poaceae: subfamilies and supertribes. Austra-
lian Journal of Botany 33: 433^184.
WATSON, L., DALLWITZ, M. J. & JOHNSTON, C. R. 1986. Grass
genera of the world: 728 detailed descriptions from an automated
database. Australian Journal of Botany 34: 223-230.
Bothalia 18,1: 105-110(1988)
Ecology and population biology of Euphorbia perangusta (Euphor-
biaceae) in the Transvaal, South Africa
P. A. RAAL*
Keywords: conservation status, ecology, endangered species. Euphorbia perangusta, Euphorbiaceae, habitat, monitoring, population biology,
Transvaal
ABSTRACT
The conservation status of Euphorbia perangusta R. A. Dyer, an endangered plant restricted to the Marico District of the
Transvaal, South Africa, and adjoining parts of Bophuthatswana was determined. The distribution, habitat and population
dynamics of E. perangusta are discussed.
The monitoring of the largest known population has revealed that this population has declined rapidly since the onset of a
drought in 1983. The major cause of this decline appears to be the destruction of the plants by porcupines which feed on E.
perangusta during droughts.
It appears that, during droughts, E. perangusta is restricted to rocky ridges because there is an increase in porcupine
damage on more accessible populations. The species is also subjected to other factors which reduce flower formation in a large
proportion of plants. If these factors continue to operate, the species could become extinct in the near future. Conservation
recommendations are discussed.
UITTREKSEL
Euphorbia perangusta R. A. Dyer, ’n bedreigde plant wat in sy verspreiding beperk is tot die Maricodistrik van die
Transvaal, Suid-Afrika, en ’n aangrensende gebied in Bophuthatswana, se bewaringstatus is bepaal. Die verspreiding, habitat
en populasiedinamika van E. perangusta word bespreek.
Moniteringsresultate het getoon dat die grootste bekende populasie se getalle drasties verminder het sedert die aanvang van
die droogte in 1983. Die primere oorsaak van hierdie afname in getalle kan toegeskryf word aan die voedingsgewoontes van
ystervarke tydens droogte-periodes.
Dit wil voorkom asof E. perangusta-pV<m\e gedurende droogteperiodes, tot rotsagtige rante beperk word as gevolg van ’n
toename in ystervarkskade aan meer toeganklike populasies. Die spesie word ook blootgestel aan ander faktore wat ’n afname
in blomvorming by baie van die plante tot gevolg het. Indien hierdie oorsaaklike faktore ongehinderd voortduur, kan die spesies
in die nabye toekoms uitsterf. Bewaringsrigiyne word bespreek.
INTRODUCTION
Euphorbia perangusta R. A. Dyer was first described
(Dyer 1938) from material collected in the Marico Dis-
trict of the western Transvaal. The plants are distinctive
in that the primary branches rarely re-branch and that
they have very thin wing-like angles (Figure 1). The
species is threatened by collecting, small mammal dam-
age and trampling by cattle (White et at. 1941; Fourie
1982). This has resulted in a serious decline in the
number of plants, causing it to be listed as an endangered
species (Fourie 1986).
Fourie (1982) briefly described the habitat of E. per-
angusta Dyer (1938) and White et al. (1941) state from
notes made by the discoverer of the species that E. per-
angusta appeared not to set seed even though large
numbers of flowers were formed.
METHODS
Distribution
All distribution records for E. perangusta were ex-
tracted from the literature and the National Herbarium in
Pretoria, using the method proposed by Hall et al.
(1984). The recorded localities were visited and the
* Transvaal Provincial Administration, Division of Nature Conserva-
tion, Private Bag X1088, Lydenburg 1 120.
MS. received: 1987.02.03.
FIGURE 1. — Euphorbia perangusta R. A. Dyer in its natural habitat.
species searched for and positively identified in the field.
New populations in the Transvaal (excluding Bophutha-
tswana) were searched for in the manner described by
Fourie (1986) in June 1985. Populations were defined as
stands further than two kilometres apart.
Habitat
The physiognomy of the vegetation associated with
each population was recorded. The vegetation structure
was classified according to Edwards (1983). Average
annual precipitation was obtained from a local land-
106
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
owner and tested for reliability against Weather Bureau
records (Weather Bureau 1986) of rainfall stations in the
District. Altitude to the nearest 20 m above sea level and
aspect for each new population found was recorded from
South Africa 1:50 000 topocadastral maps. Soil texture
was recorded on site for each population using the sau-
sage method (National Working Group For Vegetation
Ecology 1986). The geology associated with each popu-
lation was determined using a recent 1 :250 000 geologi-
cal map (Visser 1984).
In addition to the above, presence of all trees, shrubs
and herbs growing within 3 m of twenty randomly se-
lected E. perangusta plants were recorded, i.e. plants
directly associated with E. perangusta. The species at
each population were recorded. The Czekanowski coef-
ficient (Bray & Curtis 1957), was used to show the per-
centage similarity between sets of these species. The
formula used was
2w
x 100
A + B
where W = number of associate species in common;
A = number of associates for one population, and B =
number of associates for another population.
Monitoring
In June 1979 the largest population (no. 1) of E. per-
angusta was first visited and a total count of all plants
done. The state of each plant, i.e. whether vegetative or
flowering, was recorded.
In June 1985 a total count of all plants in all popula-
tions found was done and the state of each plant, i.e.
whether vegetative or flowering, was recorded.
A permanent monitor plot measuring 30 m x 50 m
was established centrally within the largest known E.
perangusta (no. 1 ) population so that changes over time
in the population and the vegetation associated with the
population could be recorded. The four comers of the
plot were permanently marked by piles of white painted
rocks. Monitoring was carried out during the last week
of June 1985 and 1986.
The monitor plot was subdivided into sixty 5 x 5m
blocks and the exact locality of each individual E. per-
angusta plant within these blocks was mapped. This pro-
cedure allows for individual plants to be easily relocated
in successive years and facilitates the recording of infor-
mation for each plant in the plot. This procedure is es-
sential if a full life-table analysis is to be made as an aid
to understanding the population biology of E. per-
angusta. It is possible that short-lived seedlings that
were recruited into the population may have been missed
by monitoring only once a year.
The following information was recorded for each E.
perangusta plant within the monitor plot: a, plant dead or
alive; b, state of plant — vegetative or flowering; and c,
factors affecting the plant. Additional information re-
corded included (a) precipitation for year of monitoring;
(b) land use practice; (c) vegetation structure; (d) domi-
nant associated vegetation; and (e) disturbances to the
habitat of the population.
The classes of factors affecting the plant, land use
practices and disturbances to the habitat were determined
by the percentage of E. perangusta plants affected and
divided into the following: (i) modifies but does not de-
stroy habitat or affects but does not kill plant and (ii)
destroys habitat and/or plant or has potential to do so.
Photographs of the monitor plot from a fixed photo
point were taken in June 1985 and June 1986 to visually
record change in the vegetation over time.
RESULTS
Distribution
Prior to this study E. perangusta was known from
only two populations (White etal. 1941); one of which is
in Bophuthatswana. During this study four additional
populations were found in South Africa. Figure 2 shows
the known distribution of E. perangusta in the Trans-
vaal. In South Africa the species is restricted to the Ma-
rico District of western Transvaal.
FIGURE 2. — The known distribution of Euphorbia perangusta R. A.
Dyer in the Transvaal.
Habitat
All populations occur within Acocks (1975) Veld
Type No. 13 — Other Turf Thomveld, are at altitudes of
1 050-1 150 m and receive an annual average precipita-
tion of 450 mm. Four of the five known Transvaal popu-
lations are found on the southern or south-eastern slopes
of quartzite ridges. Table 1 shows the approximate dis-
tances between the five known E. perangusta popula-
tions in the Transvaal. The plants grow in partial to full
sunlight, are wedged between rocks in well drained,
gritty sand and vary in height from 50-900 mm. The
vegetation associated with E. perangusta populations on
the ridges is a Croton gratissimus var. gratissimus domi-
nated woodland with a tall (3-5 m), open structure (Ed-
wards 1983).
The fifth population of plants was found growing ap-
proximately 40 m from a quartzite hill on a flat, sandy
plain. No surface rocks were present. The plants grow in
the shade of trees in deep (>1 m) alluvium soil and vary
in height from 0,2- 1,2 m. The vegetation associated
with this population is a Peltophorum africanum and
Terminalia sericea dominated woodland with a tall
(5- 10 m), closed structure (Edwards 1983).
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
107
TABLE 1. — Approximate distances (km) between the five
known populations of Euphorbia perangusta R.A. Dyer in
the Transvaal
Populations
TABLE 2. — Plants associated with Euphorbia perangusta
populations
Occurrence within
E. perangusta
Species populations
• species present; - species absent.
Table 2 presents the floristic composition of the vege-
tation associated with the five E. perangusta popula-
tions.
Population similarity
Table 3 shows the percentage similarity between the
five populations based on associated vegetation using the
Czekanowski coefficient.
TABLE 3. — Percentage similarity between sets of associates for
five Euphorbia perangusta populations, using between-
population frequency data on tree, shrub and herb asso-
ciates (Table 1 ) to calculate the Czekanowski co-efficient
Populations
1 2 3 4 5
The habitat of E. perangusta is similar in all popula-
tions except for the population growing on the flat, sandy
plain. Similarity values between sets of associates (Table
3) were high for the four populations occurring on the
rocky ridges. Population no. 5 showed a low similarity
between sets of associates with each of the other four
populations.
The difference in the species composition of the asso-
ciated vegetation of the population growing on the flat,
sandy plain may be due to the deeper, alluvial soil in that
area. The occurrence of Terminalia sericea, a tree spec-
ies associated with deep, sandy soils (Coates Palgrave
1983; Palmer & Pitman 1972), the taller, more closed
structure of the associated vegetation and the taller E.
perangusta plants within this population, support this
view.
Number of plants in each population
Table 4 presents the number of plants for each popula-
tion of E. perangusta as determined in June 1985. It
shows that the populations on the rocky ridges (nos 1 -4)
comprise more plants than the population (no. 5) on the
flat, sandy plain.
TABLE 4. — Numbers of plants in the five known populations
of Euphorbia perangusta in the Transvaal as determined
in June 1985
Population biology
Figure 3 shows the population dynamics of the largest
known E. perangusta population (no. 1) as determined
from a survey undertaken in June 1979 and monitoring
over the period 1985-1986. Figure 3 shows that this
population is declining dramatically and could soon be-
come extinct.
Mortality
Figure 3 shows that the total population (no. 1) de-
clined from 135 plants in 1979 to 108 in 1986. 5,18 % of
the plants in the monitor plot died between June 1979
and June 1985, while 15,26 % died between June 1985
108
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
and June 1986. All mortalities recorded in the monitor
plot were due to the physical destruction of plants by
porcupines ( Hystrix africaeaustralis Peters) which ex-
posed and ate the subterranean stems and roots (Figure
4). Porcupines are predominantly vegetarian, eating
bulbs, tubers and roots which they dig up (Smithers
1983).
Table 4 shows the numbers of plants in each popula-
tion killed by porcupines (class ii factor) in 1985.
I
1985
Years
•- - -• Flowering plants (monitor plot)
° — ° Flowering plants (total of popubtio
' “• Total of live plants of population
Deod pbnts
□ Living pbnts
■ New plants
FIGURE 3. — The population dynamics of Euphorbia perangusta R.
A. Dyer in population No 1 .
Number of plants
Figure 3 shows the numbers of living and dead plants
present in the monitor plot in both 1985 and 1986. One
new seedling was noted in the monitor plot in 1985 and
none in 1986.
Flower formation
Figure 3 shows that the proportion of plants that flow-
ered in the population declined from 66,6 % in 1985 to
3,17 % in 1986. The proportion of plants that flowered
in the monitor plot declined from 69,44 % in 1985 to
3,27% in 1986.
FIGURE 4. — The physical destruction of Euphorbia perangusta R. A.
Dyer plants by porcupines (Hystrix africaeaustralis Peters).
Factors affecting the taxon
Besides porcupines, other class i factors affecting E.
perangusta are: destruction of emergent branches by
trampling (Fourie 1982) (Figure 5); and the destruction
of emergent branches by insect larvae (Figure 6). These
factors, although obvious, are difficult to quantify.
Fixed photo point
No obvious change in the vegetation in the monitor
plot was recorded between June 1985 and June 1986.
FIGURE 5. — The destruction of emergent branches of Euphorbia per-
angusta by trampling.
FIGURE 6. — The destruction of emergent branches of Euphorbia per-
angusta by an unidentified moth species.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
109
for the Marico District. Years
Mean -Marico rainfall station
Mean
Rainfall
Figure 7 shows the annual rainfall figures for the Ma-
rico District for the past 15 years as recorded by a local
landowner. The histogram shows that the species has
been experiencing drought conditions in 1984, 1985 and
1986.
The mean annual rainfall figures for the Marico rain-
fall station for the years 1951-1984 (Weather Bureau
1986) is shown on Figure 7. The Marico rainfall station
is situated approximately 80 kilometres south of the E.
perangusta populations.
DISCUSSION
Distribution
From this study it appears that E. perangusta is en-
demic to the Marico District of the western Transvaal in
South Africa and western Bophuthatswana. The highly
localized distribution range of the species within the
Transvaal was intensively and repeatedly searched and it
is unlikely that any additional populations remain undis-
covered in the Province.
The distribution of E. perangusta extends marginally
into Bophuthatswana; with one population (White et al.
1941) being recorded for that region. It is possible that a
few small populations remain undiscovered in Bophu-
thatswana and adjacent parts of Botswana.
Population biology
Mortality
E. perangusta numbers confirm that it is an en-
dangered species and is in danger of becoming extinct if
the factors causing its decline are allowed to continue
operating. The results show that plant mortalities have
increased dramatically since the start of a drought in June
1983.
The greatest factor causing the death of E. perangusta
plants are porcupines which expose and eat the subterra-
nean stems and roots (White et al. 1941; Fourie 1982;
this study). The shortage of available food since the start
of the drought has forced the porcupines to utilize alter-
native sources; one source being the roots and stems of
E. perangusta plants. Porcupine damage has increased
since the start of the drought and has resulted in a rapid
decline in the number of plants in the population being
monitored.
Porcupine damage was most evident in population no.
5 located on the deep, sandy plain. It is obviously easier
for the porcupines to expose the roots and stems of plants
growing in deep sand than those growing wedged
between rocks. The majority of plants on the rocky
ridges that were damaged by porcupines grew in relati-
vely large pockets of soil.
Flower formation
The sudden decline in flowering from 1985 to 1986
may be due to reduced rainfall in 1986. Flower forma-
tion appears to be suppressed when there is a shortage of
water during the period of active growth (October— June)
of the plants.
The fewer flowers formed in 1986 resulted in a lower
potential for seed set and consequently, the number of
seedlings that could be recruited into the population.
Factors affecting the taxon
(i) Trampling: the five Transvaal populations were
subjected to trampling by cattle. Although normally non-
fatal, trampling has the effect of breaking off emergent
branches and exposing the subterranean stems. The
drought has forced cattle to wander onto the rocky ridges
in search of food. This increased exposure of E. peran-
gusta plants to trampling, and the subsequent breaking
110
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
off of emergent branches, may have contributed to the
sudden decline in flower formation in the population
being studied.
(ii) Insect larvae: in all populations the larvae of an
unidentified moth species were observed boring into and
hollowing out from the inside the emergent branches of
E. perangusta plants. The presence of the moth larvae
appears non-fatal to the plant but they destroy the emer-
gent branches. The destruction of the emergent branches
may have contributed to the sudden decline in flower
formation in the population being studied.
The results suggest that E. perangusta is being ex-
posed to three main factors resulting in either the death
or reduced flower formation of a large proportion of
plants.
E. perangusta appears more vigorous on the deep soils
between the rocky ridges but, because they are not af-
forded protection by rocks, are more vulnerable to
destruction by porcupines. Plants growing on flat, sandy
plains are easily excavated and are the first to be utilized
by porcupines as a source of food during droughts. A
prolonged drought, with the resultant destruction of
plants by porcupines, coupled with a low recruitment to
the population has resulted in those populations on the
sandy plains becoming extinct or being greatly dimin-
ished.
Plants growing wedged between rocks on the rocky
ridges are extremely difficult to excavate (Dyer 1938).
Only plants growing in the larger pockets of soil and
which are relatively easy to excavate, or stems that have
been exposed by cattle trampling, are utilized as food by
the porcupines during droughts.
Recruitment in the populations on rocky ridges may be
reduced because fertile seed often lands on rock and
cannot germinate.
Populations elsewhere may only be established and
persist during wet periods when porcupine damage
would be minimal.
Conservation recommendations
The results suggest the urgent need for the implemen-
tation of conservation management to ensure the survival
of E. perangusta. All the remaining populations should
be securely fenced to exclude porcupines and cattle. This
would reduce mortality and allow the maturation of juve-
nile plants. This would give the species a better chance
of surviving droughts until conditions favourable for
flowering, and subsequent recruitment, return.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am indebted to Mr D. Allen for his constructive
comments regarding the manuscript. I would like to
thank the Director of Nature Conservation, Transvaal for
permission to publish this paper.
REFERENCES
ACOCKS, J. P. H. 1975. Veld types of South Africa. Memoirs of the
Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 40: 1-127.
BRAY, R. J. & CURTIS, T. T. 1957. An ordination of upland forest
communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs 22:
325-349.
COATES PALGRAVE, K. 1983. Trees of southern Africa: 684-685,
3rd impr. Struik, Cape Town.
DYER, R. A. 1938. Flowering plants of southern Africa: t. 7 16.
EDWARDS, D. 1983. A broad-scale structural classification of vege-
tation for practical purposes. Bothalia 14: 705-712.
FOURIE, S. P. 1978. A survey of rare and endangered taxa of the
Transvaal. In Project Plan, Pretoria, Division of Nature Conser-
vation, Transvaal Provincial Administration.
FOURIE, S. P. 1982. Threatened Euphorbias in the Transvaal. Aloe
19:111-125.
FOURIE, S. P. 1986. The Transvaal, South Africa, threatened plants
programme. Biological Conserx’ation 37: 23-42.
HALL, A. V., DE WINTER, B., FOURIE, S. P. & ARNOLD, T. H.
1984. Threatened plants in southern Africa. Biological Conserva-
tion 28: 5-20.
NATIONAL WORKING GROUP FOR VEGETATION ECOLOGY
1986. Soil classification according to the binomial classification
system. Technical Communication No. 3.
PALMER, E. & PITMAN, N. 1972. Trees of southern Africa, vol. 3
Balkema, Cape Town.
SMITHERS, R. H. N. 1983. The mammals of the southern African
subregion. University of Pretoria.
VISSER, D. J. L. 1984. Geological map of the Republic of South
Africa, Transkei, Bophuthatswana, Venda and Ciskei and the
Kingdoms of Lesotho and Swaziland. Government Printer, Preto-
ria.
WEATHER BUREAU 1986. Climate of South Africa . Climate statis-
tics up to 1984. Government Printer, Pretoria.
WHITE, A., DYER, R. A. & SLOANE, B. L. 1941. The succulent
Euphorbieae (southern Africa) 2: 825-828. Abbey Garden Press,
California.
Bothalia 18, 1: 111-123(1988)
Miscellaneous notes
VARIOUS AUTHORS
CHROMOSOME STUDIES ON AFRICAN PLANTS. 6.
The presentation of chromosome numbers in this
report conforms with the outlay described in the first
publications in this series (Spies & Du Plessis 1986a &
b; 1987a & b; Spies & Jonker 1987).
POACEAE
Arundineae
Urochlaena pusilla Nees: n = 6.
CAPE. — 3119 (Calvinia): 32 km south of Nieuwoudtville (-CA),
Spies 31 18.
Chaetobromus dregeanus Nees: n = 36.
CAPE. — 3119 (Calvinia): 4 km south of Nieuwoudtville (-AC),
Spies 31 15.
Pentaschistis airoides (Nees) Stapf: n = 7, n = 14, n =
28.
CAPE. — 3017 (Hondeklipbaai): 12 km east of Hondeklipbaai
(-AD), Spies 3036 (n = 14). 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): Gifberg Pass
(-DC), Spies 3088 (n = 28), Spies 3102 (n = 14). 3119 (Calvinia):
Vanrhyns’ Pass (-AC), Spies 3113 (n = 7). 3218 (Clanwilliam):
Versveld Pass (-DC), Spies 3166 (n = 7). 3219 (Wuppertal): Peer-
boomhoek (-CD), Spies 3151 (n = 14); Hartnekskloof (-DC), Spies
3145 (n = 14). 3220 (Sutherland): 2 km from Sutherland to Calvinia
( - BC), Spies 3130 (n = 7), 3133 (n = 14).
P. aristifolia Schweick.: n = 14.
CAPE. — 3119 (Calvinia): 32 km south of Nieuwoudtville (-CA),
Spies 31 19.
P. eriostoma (Nees) Stapf: n = 26.
CAPE. — 3219 (Wuppertal): Hartnekskloof (-DC), Spies 3144.
P. malouinensis (Steud.) Clayton: n = 7.
CAPE. — 3320 (Montagu): Tradouw Pass (-DC), Spies 3259.
P. tomentella Stapf: n = 14.
CAPE. — 2917 (Springbok): 10 km from Springbok to Hondeklip-
baai (-DD), Spies 3008.
Karroochloa tenella (Nees) Conert & Turpe: n = 6.
CAPE. — 3119 (Calvinia): 20 km from Calvinia to Loeriesfontein
(-AB), Spies 3125. 3220 (Sutherland): 2 km from Sutherland to Cal-
vinia (-BC), Spies 3129.
Merxmuellera dura (Stapf) Conert: n = 28.
CAPE. — 3119 (Calvinia): 18 km south of Nieuwoudtville (-CA),
Spies 31 16.
Schismus scaberrimus Nees: n = 24, n = 36.
CAPE. — 3017 (Hondeklipbaai): Kamiesberg Pass (-BB). Spies
3051 (n = 24), 3054 (n = 36).
Dregeochloa pumila (Nees) Conert: n = 21.
CAPE. — 2816 (Oranjemund): Beauvallon (-DA), Spies 2957.
Andropogoneae
Cymbopogon prolixus (Stapf) Phill. : n = 20.
CAPE. — 3018 (Kamiesberg): Studers' Pass (-AC), Spies 3065.
Hyparrhenia anamesa Clayton: n = 20, n = 30.
CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): near Stellenbosch intersection on road
from Paarl to Franschhoek (-DD), Spies 3200 (n = 30). 3320 (Mon-
tagu): Tradouw Pass (-DC), Spies 3263 (n = 20).
H. hirta (L.) Stapf: n = 30.
CAPE.— 2917 (Springbok): Wildeperdehoek Pass (-DB), Spies
3017.
Paniceae
Digitaria sp.: n = 9.
CAPE. — 3321 (Ladismith): Seweweekspoort (-AD), Spies 3271.
Panicum stapfianum Fourc.: n = 18.
CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): Tini Versveld Wildflower Reserve
(- AD), Spies 3188.
Paspalidium obtusifolium (Del.) Simpson: n = 18.
NATAL. — 2832 (Mtubatuba): Lake Bangazi ( — BA), Spies 2370.
Rhynchelytrum repens (Willd.) C. E. Hubb.: n = 18.
CAPE. — 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): Gifberg Pass (-DC). Spies 3100.
DISCUSSION
The basic chromosome numbers presented in this
article conform, in most instances, to published results
for the same species, or for other species of the genus
(Darlington & Wylie 1955; Omduff 1967-1969; Fedo-
rov 1969; Moore 1970-1977, 1973; Goldblatt
1981-1985).
This study concentrated on the tribe Arundineae. The
classification of the genus Pentaschistis is according to
the preliminary results of a revision of this genus by Dr
H. P. Linder (Bolus Herbarium, University of Cape
Town) and all the specimens were identified by him.
The chromosome number of 2n = 6x = 42 for Dre-
geochloa pumila is the first chromosome number re-
ported for this genus. A basic number of seven is sug-
gested because, if the basic number was six, this plant
would be a heptaploid and either univalents or multi-
valents should be present. Since neither were present, we
regard seven to be the basic chromosome number for this
species.
Deviations from the previously reported chromosome
numbers were observed in two of the specimens studied.
The first specimen was Urochlaena pusilla (Figure la),
where 2n = 4x = 12 was observed in contrast to the
basic number of x = 7 described by Watson, Dallwitz &
Johnston (1986). Unfortunately it is not possible to trace
their source for this basic number, since the DELTA
system (Descriptive Language for Taxonomy) does not
include references. The normal chromosome behaviour
observed in this specimen gives no indication of
aneuploidy. Since the geographical distribution of this
112
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
FIGURE 1 . — Chromosomes in: a, Urochlaena pusilla ( Spies 3118 , 2n = 12); b, Pentaschistis airoides
(Spies 3130 , n = 7); c, P. eriostoma ( Spies 3144, n = 26, with one large ring-shaped quadrivalent
(Q) in each cell); d, P. malouinensis ( Spies 3259, n = 7, with two fragments (F) indicated by
arrows); e & f, Karroochloa tenella (Spies 3125, n = 6). All X 1250.
species is restricted to a very small area in South Africa,
large scale aneuploidy, with subsequent karyotype evo-
lution to form only bivalents, does not seem likely. More
specimens must be studied before more definite conclu-
sions can be made.
The second deviation from the expected number was
observed in Merxmuellera dura. The specimen studied
has a chromosome number of 2n = 8x = 56, in contrast
to the expected multiples of six. Watson et al. (1986)
described a basic chromosome number of x = 6 with
diploid and hexaploid specimens. This is probably based
on the M. arundinacea (2n = 12), M. disticha (2n = 12)
and M. stricta (2n = 36) specimens described by De Wet
(1954 & 1960). With a basic number of six the specimen
studied must either represent 2n = (9x + 2) = 56 or 2n
= (lOx - 4) = 56. If the specimen is nonaploid with two
additional chromosomes, between four (the two
additional chromosomes are at least homoeologous to
two chromosomes of the ninth genome) and eight univa-
lents (the additional chromosomes are not homoeologous
to any chromosomes of the ninth genome or to one
another) must be visible in each cell since no multiva-
lents are formed. As some cells contained no univalents,
this rationale is invalid. If this specimen represents a
decaploid in which four chromosomes were somehow
lost, a maximum of four univalents is expected. How-
ever, in high polyploids univalents are often present due
to competition to pair (Alonso & Kimber 1981; Espi-
nasse & Kimber 1981 ; Kimber & Alonso 1981 , Jackson
& Casey 1982; Spies 1984). Up to six univalents were
observed, therefore it seems possible that this species
might be an aneuploid form where four chromosomes
were lost from a decaploid. It is also possible that this
species has a basic chromosome number of seven and
this specimen represents an octoploid form. Further stu-
dies in this group will show whether six or seven is the
basic chromosome number for the genus.
The basic chromosome numbers of the genus Penta-
schistis are 7, 10 or 13 (Watson et al. 1986). Our study
confirms a basic chromosome number of seven for the
species P. airoides (Figure lb),/3, aristifolia, P. maloui-
nensis (Figure Id) and P. tomenteUa , as well as a basic
number of 13 for P. eriostoma (Figure lc). The basic
chromosome number of 10 reported by Watson et al.
(1986) is probably based on a report of Hedberg (1957)
of 2n = ± 40 for P. mannii. This number may represent
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
113
FIGURE 2. — Meiotic chromosomes in: a— e, Mer.xmuellera dura [Spies 3116 , n = 28, with univalents (U), anaphase
laggards (L) and bridges ( B )] ; f, Schismus scaberrimus [Spies 3051 , n = 24, with anaphase laggards (L)]. All x 1250.
a triploid (2n = 3x = 39) (Hedberg & Hedberg 1977)
and a basic number of 10 must yet be proved. In addi-
tion, a basic chromosome number of six for the genera
Chaetobromus, Karroochloa (Figure le & 0 and Schis-
mus is confirmed by this study, as well as a basic chro-
mosome number of seven for Dregeochloa. It is clear,
therefore, that the Arundineae has two primary basic
chromosome numbers, i.e. six and seven.
Meiotic abnormalities were observed in some of the
specimens studied. These abnormalities included the
presence of fragments, univalents and laggards during
anaphase I, as well as anaphase bridges.
In Pentaschistis eriostoma (2n = 4x = 52) multi-
valents were formed and consequently univalents were
present. One large ring quadrivalent was present in most
cells (Figure lc). An insufficient number of cells were
available to determine whether this plant resulted from
autoploidy or segmental alloploidy.
P. tomentella (2n = 4x = 28) had 1-4 univalents in
30% of the cells studied, as well as anaphase 1 bridges,
suggesting karyotype evolution in the form of paracen-
tric inversions.
Meiosis in the Mer.xmuellera dura specimen. Spies
3116. was very abnormal. From 0—6 univalents were
114
observed (Figure 2c-e) and the same range of anaphase
I laggards (Figure 2a), with 2—4 laggards in the majority
of cells, was present. In association with the laggards a
bridge was usually present from early anaphase I to telo-
phase I in some instances (Figure 2b). No multivalents
were observed.
The Schismus scaberrimus (2n = 8x = 48) specimen
had up to four univalents, as well as up to seven multiva-
lents (trivalents and quadrivalents) per cell. Chromo-
some laggards were usually present during anaphase I
(Figure 20- From the chromosome behaviour it can be
predicted that this plant will experience reproductive dif-
ficulties and a study of embryo sac development in this
species is required to determine the mode of
reproduction.
In conclusion, it can be stated that more cytogenetic
studies in the tribe Arundineae are required to determine
the relationship between the genera and species with
basic chromosome numbers of six and seven. Such a
study will also indicate if the secondary basic chromo-
some number of 1 3 observed in the genus Pentaschistis
originated through hybridization of plants with basic
numbers of six and seven or through aneuploidy (the loss
of a chromosome from the secondary basic number of
14) as suggested by Davidse, Hoshino & Simon (1986).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Dr H. P. Linder (Bolus Herbarium) is thanked for
identifying the Pentaschistis specimens. We are grateful
to Drs G. Davidse (Missouri Botanical Garden) and R.
P. Ellis (Botanical Research Institute) for useful sugges-
tions on the text.
REFERENCES
ALONSO, L. C. & KIMBER, G. 1981. The analysis of meiosis in
hybrids. II. Triploid hybrids. Canadian Journal of Genetics and
Cytology 23:221-234.
DARLINGTON, C. D. & WYLIE, A. P. 1955. Chromosome atlas of
flowering plants. Allen & Unwin, London.
DAVIDSE, G., HOSHINO, T. & SIMON, B. K. 1986. Chromosome
counts of Zimbabwean grasses (Poaceae) and an analysis of poly-
ploidy in the grass flora of Zimbabwe. South African Journal of
Botany 52: 521-528.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
DE WET, J. M. J. 1954. Chromosome numbers of a few South African
grasses. Cytologia 19: 97- 103.
DE WET, J. M. J. 1960. Chromosome numbers and some morphologi-
cal attributes of various South African grasses. American Journal
of Botany 47: 44-50.
ESPINASSE, A. & KIMBER, G. 1981. The analysis of meiosis in
hybrids. IV. Pentaploid hybrids. Canadian Journal of Genetics
and Cytology 23: 627-638.
FEDOROV, A. A. 1969. Chromosome numbers of flowering plants.
Academy of Science, Leningrad.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1981-1985. Index to plant chromosome numbers
1975— 1983. Monograms of Systematic Botany 5; 8; 13.
HEDBERG, O. 1957. Afro-alpine vascular plants. A taxonomic revi-
sion. Symbolae botanicae Upsaliensis 15: 1—411.
HEDBERG, I., & HEDBERG, O. 1977. Chromosome numbers of
afro-alpine and afromontane angiosperms. Botaniska Notiser 130:
1-24.
JACKSON, R. C. & CASEY, J. 1982. Cytogenetic analyses of auto-
ploids: models and methods for triploids to octoploids. American
Journal of Botany 69: 487-501.
KIMBER, G. & ALONSO, L. C. 1981. The analysis of meiosis in
hybrids. III. Tetraploid hybrids. Canadian Journal of Genetics
and Cytology 23: 235-254.
MOORE, R. J. 1970-1977. Index to plant chromosome numbers for
1968- 1974. Regnum Vegetabile 68; 77; 84; 91; 96.
MOORE, R. J. 1973. Index to plant chromosome numbers for
1967-1971. Oosthoek Uitgevers, Utrecht.
ORNDUFF, R. 1967- 1969. Index to plant chromosome numbers for
1965- 1967. Regnum Vegetabile 50; 55; 59.
SPIES, J. J. 1984. Determination of genome homology in polyploids.
South African Journal of Science 80: 44 —46.
SPIES, J. J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1986a. Chromosome studies on
African plants. 1. Bothalia 16: 87—88.
SPIES. J. J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1986b. Chromosome studies on
African plants. 2. Bothalia 16: 269-270.
SPIES, J. J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1987a. Chromosome studies on
African plants. 3. Bothalia 17: 131-135.
SPIES, J. J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1987b. Chromosome studies on
African plants. 5. Bothalia 17: 257-259.
SPIES, J. J. & JONKER, A. 1987. Chromosome studies on African
plants. 4. Bothalia 17: 135—136.
WATSON, L., DALLWITZ, M. J. & JOHNSTON, C. R. 1986. Grass
genera of the world: 720 detailed descriptions from an automated
database. Australian Journal of Botany 34: 223-230.
J. J. SPIES* and H. DU PLESSIS*
* Botanical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and Water
Supply, Private Bag X 101 , Pretoria 000 1 , RSA.
MS. received: 1987.05.25.
CHROMOSOME STUDIES ON AFRICAN PLANTS. 7.
The presentation of chromosome numbers in this re-
port conforms with the outlay described in the previous
publications in this series (Spies & Du Plessis 1986a &
b; 1987a & b; 1988; Spies & Jonker 1987).
POACEAE
Ehrharteae
Ehrharta calycina J.E. Sm. var. calycina : n = 15 +
0-4B, 24.
CAPE. — 3017 (Hondeklipbaai): 15 km east of Hondeklipbaai
(- AB), Spies 3030 (n = 15 + 0-4B), 3031 (n = 24).
E. pusilla Nees ex Trin.: n = 12.
CAPE. — 2917 (Springbok): 6 km east of Steinkopf (-BD), Spies
2989. 3018 (Kamiesberg): 16 km east of Kamieskroon ( — AC), Spies
3059.
Pappophoreae
Enneapogon cenchroides (Roem. & Schult.) C. E.
Hubb.: n = 20.
CAPE. — 2924 (Hopetown): 31 km from Hopetown to Britstown
(-DD), Spies 2709.
E. scaber Lehm.: n = 20.
SWA/NAMIBIA.— 2617 (Bethanie): Seeheim (-DD), Spies 2892.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
Eragrostideae
Diplachne fusca (L.) Beauv. ex Roem. & Schult. : n =
19.
CAPE. — 3017 (Hondeklipbaai): 6 km east of Kamieskroon (-BB),
Spies 2991 .
Eragrostis capensis (Thunb.) Trin.: n = 30.
NATAL. — 2832 (Mtubatuba): 34 km from Cape Vidal to St Lucia
(-AD), Spies 2409.
E. echinochloidea Stapf: n = 30.
CAPE. — 2822 (Glen Lyon): 93 km from Groblershoop to Kimberley
(-DC), Spies 2869.
E. lehmanniana Nees: n = 20.
CAPE. — 2822 (Glen Lyon): 38 km from Groblershoop to Kimberley
(-CD), Spies 2857.
Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn. subsp. africana (K-
O’Byme) Hilu & De Wet [= E. indica (L.) Gaertn.
subsp. africana (K.-O’Byme) S. M. Phillips]: n = 9.
NATAL. — 2832 (Mtubatuba): near Cape Vidal (- BA), Spies 2365.
CAPE. — 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): Koekenaap (— CB), Spies 2783.
Sporobolus africanus (Poir.) Robyns & Toumay: n =
18.
CAPE. — 3028 (Matatiele): Antelope Park (-CC), Spies 2529.
S. pyramidalis Beauv.: n = 12, n = 15.
SWAZILAND. — 13 km from Manzini to Siteki (- AD), Spies 2588
(n = 15), 2594 (n = 12).
Poeae
Poa annua L.: n = 14.
CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): near Stellenbosch turnoff on road be-
tween Paarl and Franschhoek (-DD), Spies 3205.
Festuca scabra Vahl: n = 21.
CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): Franschhoek Pass (-CC), Spies 3219.
Lolium multiflorum Lam.: n = 7 + 0— 2B.
CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): 1 km east of Mamre (-BC), Spies
3191.
L. perenne L. x L. multiflorum Lam.: n = 14.
O.F.S. — 2826 (Brandfort): Glen Agricultural College (-CD), Spies
2663.
L. rigidum Gaudin: n = 7.
CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): 1 km east of Mamre (-BC), Spies
3190.
Briza maxima L.: n = 7.
CAPE. — 3218 (Clanwilliam): Versveld Pass (-DC), Spies 3159.
3318 (Cape Town): Stellenbosch turnoff on road between Paarl and
Franschhoek (-DD), Spies 3204.
Vulpia bromoides (L.) S. F. Gray: n = 7.
CAPE. — 3018 (Kamiesberg): 16 km east of Kamieskroon (—AC),
Spies 3060.
V. muralis (Kunth) Nees: n = 14.
CAPE. — 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): Gifberg Pass (-DC), Spies 3084.
V. myuros (L.) C. C. Gmel.: n = 7 + 2B.
CAPE. — 3126 (Queenstown): 3 km from Molteno to Steynsburg
( — AD), Spies 1849a.
115
Agrostideae
Polypogon monspeliensis (L.) Desf.: n = 14.
CAPE. — 2917 (Springbok): Wildeperdehoek Pass (-DB), Spies
3014.
Lophochloa pumila (Desf.) Bor: n = 14 + 0— 4B.
CAPE. — 2917 (Springbok): Wildeperdehoek Pass (-DB), Spies
3024.
Lagurus ovatus L.: n = 7.
CAPE. — 3418 (Simon’s Town): I km north of Scarborough (-AB),
Spies 3237.
Aveneae
Anthoxanthum tongo (Trin.) Stapf: n = 20 + 0— 5B.
CAPE. — 31 18 (Vanrhynsdorp): Gifberg Pass (-DC), Spies 3083.
Koeleria capensis (Steud.) Nees: n = 7.
CAPE. — 3320 (Montagu): 6 km north of De Hoop Nature Reserve
(- AD), Spies 3250.
Meliceae
Melica racemosa Thunb.: n = 9.
CAPE. — 3320 (Montagu): 6 km from Malgas to Bredasdorp
( — AD), Spies 3253.
Phalarideae
Phalaris minor Retz.: n = 7, n = 21.
CAPE. — 2917 (Springbok): Wildeperdehoek Pass ( — DB), Spies
3023 (n = 21). 31 18 (Vanrhynsdorp): Gifberg Pass (-DC), Spies 3 108
(n = 7).
DISCUSSION
In contrast to previous articles in this series, where the
occurrence of certain phenomena, e.g. the presence of
univalents, was discussed separately for all the taxa con-
cerned, this paper will discuss the meiotic chromosome
behaviour of each species individually. In this report the
basic chromosome number of any taxon is taken to be the
highest common denominator of the majority of speci-
mens as described in Darlington & Wylie (1955); Om-
duff (1967-1969), Fedorov (1969); Moore, R. J.
(1970-1977); Moore, D. M. (1982) and Goldblatt
(1981-1985).
Ehrharteae
The basic chromosome number of the Ehrharteae is
considered to be 12 (Watson et al. 1986). In this study
somatic chromosome numbers of 24, 30 and 48 were
observed in specimens of the two species studied. The
Ehrharta calycina var. calycina specimen ( Spies 3030)
with a somatic chromosome number of 30, indicates that
this plant has a basic chromosome number of six rather
than 12. This specimen therefore, represents a penta-
ploid form and strongly suggests that the previously
described basic number of 12 actually represents a
secondary basic chromosome number based on x = (6 +
6).
Two specimens of Ehrharta calycina var. calycina
were studied from the same locality. The one specimen
(Spies 3031) has a somatic chromosome number of 48
and normal meiosis. A meiotic chromosome configura-
tion of 20 jj 2IV was most frequently observed. The
116
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
FIGURE 3. — Meiosis in Ehrharta
species, a— c, E. calycina var.
calycina ( Spies 3030)', d, E.
pusilla ( Spies 3059). L, chro-
mosome laggard; U, univalents,
x 1300.
FIGURE 4. — Meiosis in
specimens from the
subfamily Pooideae. a,
Diplotene/diakinesis in
Poa annua ( Spies
5205); b, diakinesis in
Briza maxima ( Spies
3159)\ c, diakinesis/
metaphase in Polypo-
gon monspeliensis
( Spies 3014)', d, meta-
phase I in Anlho.xan-
thum l on go (Spies
3083). X 1200.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
second specimen ( Spies 3030) has 30 somatic chromo-
somes and a very abnormal meiosis (Figure 3a -c). In
this specimen nil to four B-chromosomes were observed.
No size differences or differences in regard to chromo-
some behaviour between the A and B-chromosomes
were observed. However, the number of B-chromo-
somes varied from cell to cell with three B-chromosomes
observed in the majority of cells studied. In addition to
the presence of B-chromosomes, an average of 1 ,7
(range from 0 to 5) univalents per cell was observed
during metaphase I. Analysis of metaphase I cells indi-
cated that chromosome configurations varied from
lj 9n lm 2IV to 5j 1 ln ljjj. During anaphase I the major-
ity of cells (8 1 ,5%) had at least one chromosome laggard
(Figure 3a & c). This abnormal meiosis resulted in mi-
cronuclei being present in 50% of the telophase II cells
studied. The presence of multivalents and univalents in
this specimen suggests at least a segmental alloploid ori-
gin for this specimen and it confirms that this specimen
represents an uneven ploidy level.
Both E. pusilla specimens formed 12n during meiosis
and no abnormalities were observed (Figure 3d).
Pappophoreae
The results of this study confirm that the basic chro-
mosome number of this tribe is ten.
Eragrostideae
In addition to the well known basic number of x = 10
in the Eragrostideae, several additional basic chromo-
some numbers are reported. Among these a basic chro-
mosome number of x = 6 for the genus Sporobolus was
observed. Another deviation from these basic chromo-
some numbers is the genus Eleusine with x = 9. This is a
well known departure from the rest of the tribe (Watson
et al. 1986). In one cell of E. coracana var. africana
( Spies 2365), a fragment was present.
An unexpected deviation was encountered in a
Diplachne fusca specimen (Spies 2991) with n = 19. We
suggest that this specimen represents an aneuploid form
of this genus which has a basic chromosome number of
ten (Watson et al. 1986). In spite of the suggested
aneuploidy present in Diplachne fusca, no further abnor-
malities were observed. The absence of univalents
indicates that a homologous pair of chromosomes was
somehow lost in this specimen.
Meiotic chromosome configurations revealed that up
to six univalents were present in an Eragrostis lehman-
niana specimen (Spies 2857). Since no multivalents
were formed, the presence of univalents may be attri-
buted to hybridization (segmental alloploidy). The other
Eragrostis specimens showed bivalents only. Further in-
vestigations of this genus may reveal whether the
absence of multivalents can be attributed to an alloploid
origin or to the presence of genes inhibiting multivalent
formation.
Chromosome configurations indicated that some mul-
tivalents are formed in Sporobolus africanus. During this
117
study between nil and two trivalents per cell were
observed. The basic number of x = 6 for the genus
Sporobolus mentioned above, is deduced from S. afri-
canus (n = 18) and 5. pyramidalis (n = 12 & 15). The
basic numbers of the genus Sporobolus are usually con-
sidered to be 6, 9 or 10 (Davidse, Hoshino & Simon
1986), with the majority of specimens having a basic
chromosome number of 9, being tetraploid (2n = 4x =
36) (Watson et al. 1986). The observation that two spe-
cimens of S. pyramidalis from the same locality have
somatic chromosome numbers of 24 and 30 indicates
that the basic number is 6 and that these specimens are
respectively 2n = 4x = 24 and 2n = 5x = 30. The
majority of the specimens studied, therefore, represent
hexaploid plants and not tetraploid plants as generally
accepted.
The difference between basic chromosome numbers of
six and ten implies a greater phylogenetic difference than
between plants with basic numbers of nine and ten. The
loss of a single chromosome from a plant with a basic
number of ten will result in a basic number of nine,
whereas a chromosome doubling from x = 6 to x = 12,
with the subsequent loss of two chromosomes, are
required to produce a plant with a basic chromosome
number of ten. Detailed cytogenetic studies in the genus
Sporobolus will reveal if this dibasic group represents a
single phylogenetic entity. If it is actually a single phylo-
genetic entity such studies may help resolve which group
of species is the most primitive.
Poeae
All specimens studied confirm a basic chromosome
number of seven for this tribe. Chromosome configura-
tions were, in most instances, restricted to bivalents
(Figures 4a-d). The exceptions were Festuca scabra
with a meiotic chromosome configuration of 17n 2JV.
High chiasma frequencies were observed in Lophochloa
pumila, Briza maxima and Polypogon monspeliensis
where the majority of bivalents formed rings (Figure 4b
& c), in contrast to the rod-bivalents usually observed.
B-chromosomes were observed in several specimens,
i.e. Lolium multiflorum (Spies 3191) with nil to two,
Vulpia myuros (Spies 1849a) with two in every cell and
Lophochloa pumila (Spies 3024) with nil to four per cell.
One of the most interesting phenomena observed dur-
ing this study is a possible translocation in a Lagurus
FIGURE 5. — Metaphase I in Lagurus ovatus ( Spies 3237) showing
only six meiotic figures of which one (indicated by arrow) is a
quadrivalent (note the 90° rotation of this chromosome figure in
b). X 1040.
118
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
FIGURE 6. — Diagrammatic repre-
sentation of possible cause for
the abnormal meiosis in Lagu-
rus ovatus. a, two pairs of nor-
mal homologous chromosomes;
b, translocation of a portion of
one chromosome to another; c,
pairing of the translocated chro-
mosome with its homologous
and homoeologous partners; d,
anaphase I segregation of the
chromosomes after cross-over
has occurred; e, recombination
of chromosomal material in the
offspring.
ovatus specimen. Spies 3237. This plant is a diploid (2n
= 2x = 14) but only six meiotic figures were formed in
each cell (Figures 5a & b). The one figure is much larger
than the rest and is obviously a quadrivalent (Figures 5a
& b). The interesting feature of this quadrivalent is its
orientation. Instead of the two homoeologous chromo-
somes lying side by side on the metaphase plate with the
duplicated part forming a chiasma, the homoeologous
chromosomes are lying on top of each other (Figure 5b).
The significance of this 90° rotation is not clear. It is
proposed that the quadrivalent is formed by a transloca-
tion. Due to the translocation the two figure 8 homolo-
gous chromosome pairs form a chiasma in the long arms
of the two homoeologous chromosomes (the parental
form and the translocated form) (Figures 6a-e).
Aveneae
Anthoxanthum tongo ( Spies 3083 ) has a basic chromo-
some number of ten (2n = 40) (Figure 4d), and the
highest ploidy level so far known in the genus. Previous
chromosome counts indicate that the genus Anthoxan-
thum has a basic chromosome number of 10 (or 5), in
contrast to the basic number of seven usually found in
the Aveneae (Watson et al. 1986). Between nil and five
B-chromosomes were observed per cell in this specimen.
Meliceae
This study confirms that this tribe, with its basic chro-
mosome number of nine, deviates from the expected
basic chromosome number of seven for the subfamily.
Phalarideae
The chromosome numbers observed for Phalaris
minor, 2n = 14 and 42, confirm published results (Wat-
son etal. 1986).
CONCLUSION
The presence and behaviour of accessory (or B-)
chromosomes in the South African flora has been studied
inadequately. Usually B-chromosomes are somewhat
smaller than A-chromosomes, they can contain more
heterochromatin and their number may vary from one
population to another, from one individual to another, or
even from one cell to another (Stebbins 1971; Sybenga
1972; Jones 1978). This on-going study on the chromo-
some numbers of South African grasses, will continue to
gather information on the presence and behaviour of B-
chromosomes which may assist in interpreting the evolu-
tionary importance of B-chromosomes in this family.
REFERENCES
DAVIDSE, G., HOSHINO, T. & SIMON, B. K. 1986. Chromosome
counts of Zimbabwean grasses (Poaceae) and an analysis of poly-
ploidy in the grass flora of Zimbabwe. South African Journal of
Botany 52: 521—528.
DARLINGTON, C. D. & WYLIE, A. P. 1955. Chromosome atlas of
flowering plants. Allen & Unwin, London.
FEDOROV, A. A. 1969. Chromosome numbers of flowering plants.
Academy of Science, USSR, Leningrad.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1981-1985. Index to plant chromosome numbers
1975- 1983. Monographs of Systematic Botany from the Missouri
Botanical Garden 5; 8; 13.
JONES, K. 1978. Aspects of chromosome evolution in higher plants.
Advances in Botanical Research 6: 156-158.
MOORE, D. M. 1982. Flora Europaea — checklist and chromosome
index. University Press, Cambridge.
MOORE, R. J. 1970- 1977. Index to plant chromosome numbers for
1968-1974. Regnum Vegetabile 68; 77; 84; 91; 96.
MOORE, R. J. 1973. Index to plant chromosome numbers for
1967-1971 . Oosthoek Uitgevers, Utrecht.
ORNDUFF, R. 1967- 1969. Index to plant chromosome numbers for
1965- 1967. Regnum Vegetabile 50; 55; 59.
SPIES, J. J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1986a. Chromosome studies on
African plants. 1 . Bothalia 16: 87-88.
SPIES, J. J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1986b. Chromosome studies on
African plants. 2. Bothalia 16: 269-270.
SPIES, J. J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1987a. Chromosome studies on
African plants. 3. Bothalia 17: 131-135.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
119
SPIES, J. J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1987b. Chromosome studies on
African plants. 5. Bothalia 17: 257-259.
SPIES, J. J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1988. Chromosome studies on Afri-
can plants. 6. Bothalia 18: 00- 00.
SPIES, J. J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1988. Chromosome studies on Afri-
can plants. 6. Bothalia 18: 1 1 1-1 14.
STEBBINS, G. L. 1971. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants.
Edward Arnold, London.
SYBENGA, J. 1972. General cytogenetics. North-Holland, Amster-
dam.
WATSON, L., DALLWITZ,M. J. & JOHNSTON, L. R. 1986. Grass
genera of the world: 728 detailed descriptions from an automated
database. Australian Journal of Botany 34: 223 — 230.
J. J. SPIES* and S. P. VOGES*
* Botanical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and Water
Supply, Private Bag X 101, Pretoria 0001 , RSA.
MS. received: 1987.05.25.
CHROMOSOME STUDIES ON AFRICAN PLANTS. 8.
The presentation of chromosome numbers in this
report conforms to the format described in the earlier
publications in this series e.g. (Spies & Du Plessis
1986a; Spies & Voges 1988).
POACEAE
Arundineae
Chaetobromus dregeanus Nees: n = 27.
CAPE. — 2816 (Oranjemund): near Beauvallon (-DA), Spies 2960.
C. involucratus (Schrad.) Nees: n = 12.
CAPE. — 2816 (Oranjemund): 30 km south of Alexander Bay
(-DC), Spies 1971. 2916 (Port Nolloth): near Port Nolloth (-BD),
Spies 2974.
C. schraderi Stapf: n = 24.
CAPE. — 2816 (Oranjemund): near Alexander Bay (-DA), Spies
2968.
Pentaschistis angulata (Nees) Adamson: n = 42, n =
91/2.
CAPE. — 3217 (Vredenburg): 8 km from Hopefield to Vredenburg
(-DD), Spies 3184 (n = 91/2). 3218 (Clanwilliam): 1 km from St
Helena to Velddrift (-CC), Spies 3178 (n = 42).
P. angustifolia (Nees) Stapf: n = 14.
CAPE. — 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): Gifberg Pass (-DC), Spies 3103.
3318 (Cape Town): 2 km east of cableway house (-CD), Spies 3239.
P. aristifolia Schweick.: n = 14.
CAPE. — 3220 (Sutherland): 2 km from Sutherland to Calvinia
(-BC), Spies 3132.
P. capillaris (Thunb.) McClean: n = 14.
CAPE. — 3219 (Wuppertal): near Peerboomhoek (-CD), Spies
3150\ near Hartnekskloof (-DC), Spies 3 146.
P. patuliflora Rendle: n = 14 + 0-2B.
CAPE. — 3420 (Bredasdorp): 6 km north of De Hoop Nature Reserve
(-AD), Spies 3243.
P. rupestris (Nees) Stapf: n = 14.
CAPE.— 3218 (Clanwilliam): Versveld Pass (-DC), Spies 3165.
P. tomentella Stapf: n = 7, n = 14 + 2B.
CAPE. — 2917 (Springbok): Aninaus Pass, Spies 2985 (n = 7); 17
km from Okiep to Goodhouse ( — BD), Spies 2996 (n = 14 + 2B).
Karroochloa schismoides (Stapf ex Conert) Conert &
Tiirpe: n = 12.
SWA/NAMIBIA. — 2716 (Witputz): 121 km south of Aus (—DA),
Spies 2937.
Merxmuellera rangei (Pilg.) Conert: n = 18.
SWA/NAMIBIA. — 2716 (Witputz): 121 km south of Aus (-DA),
Spies 2934.
Schismus barbatus (Loefl. ex L.) Thell. n = 6, n = 12,
n- 18.
SWA/NAMIBIA. — 2616 (Aus): 10 km east of Aus (— CB), Spies
2902 (n = 12). 2716 (Witputz): 141 km south of Aus (-DA), Spies
2939 (n= 18).
CAPE. — 2816 (Oranjemund): near Annisfontein (-BD), Spies 2950
(n = 6). 2917 (Springbok): Wildeperdhoek Pass ( — DB), Spies 3015 (n
= 12). 3017 (Hondeklip Bay): 12 km east of Hondeklip Bay ( — AD),
Spies 3035 (n = 12).
Dregeochloa pumila (Nees) Conert: n = 21.
CAPE. — 2816 (Oranjemund): 30 km south of Alexander Bay
(-DC), Spies 2970.
Centropodia glauca (Nees) T. A. Cope: n = 24.
SWA/NAMIBIA. — 2616 (Aus): 26 km west of Aus (— CA), Spies
2909.
CAPE.— 2816 (Oranjemund): near Beauvallon (-DA), Spies 2964.
Andropogoneae
Cymbopogon marginatus (Steud.) Stapf ex Burtt Davy:
n = 20.
CAPE. — 3420 (Bredasdorp): 6 km north of De Hoop Nature Reserve
(-AD), Spies 3244.
C. plurinodis (Hochst.) Stapf ex Burtt Davy: n = 20.
SWA/NAMIBIA.— 2616 (Aus): near Aus (-CB), Spies 2918.
Hyparrhenia anamesa Clayton: n = 20.
CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): near Stellenbosch turnoff on road be-
tween Paarl and Franschhoek (-DD), Spies 3200. 3320 (Montagu):
Tradouws’ Pass (-DC), Spies 3263.
Themeda triandra Forssk.: n = 15.
CAPE.— 31 18 (Vanrhynsdorp): Gifberg Pass (-DC), Spies 3087.
Hemarthria altissima (Poir.) Stapf & C. E. Hubb.: n =
10.
SWA/NAMIBIA. — 2816 (Oranjemund): nearDreigrat Drift (-BB),
Spies 2943.
Paniceae
Leucophrys mesocoma (Nees) Rendle: n = 27.
SWA/NAMIBIA. — 2716 (Witputz): 121 km south of Aus (-DA),
Spies 2933.
Brachiaria serrata (Thunb.) Stapf: n = 18.
CAPE. — 3320 (Montagu): Tradouws Pass (-DC), Spies 3257.
120
Cenchrus ciliaris L.: n = 27.
SWA/NAMIBIA. — 2716 (Witputz): 121 km from Aus (-DA),
Spies 2935.
Tricholaena capensis (Licht. ex Roem. & Schult.) Nees:
n = 18.
SWA/NAMIBIA. — 2616 (Aus): near Aus (— CB), Spies 2925.
DISCUSSION
The basic chromosome numbers (x) reported in this
article, correspond in most instances, to published
results for the same species, or for other species of the
same genus as abstracted in Darlington & Wylie (1955),
Omduff (1967—1969), Federov (1969), Moore
(1970-1977, 1973) and Goldblatt (1981-1985). A
brief discussion of the meiotic chromosome configura-
tions and behaviour follows. Unless specifically men-
tioned otherwise, meiosis was normal in all collections.
Arundineae
Haploid chromosome numbers (n =) of 12, 24 and 27
were observed in the three species of Chaetobromus
studied. Our study revealed a new polyploid level for C.
dregeanus (n = 27) compared to the n = 36 previously
described (Spies & Du Plessis 1988). The n = 12
described for C. involucratus and n = 24 for C. schra-
deri are the first reports for these species. C. dregeanus
( Spies 2960) has 2n = 9x = 54, indicating that this plant
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
FIGURE 7. — Meiotic chromosomes in a, Chaetobromus dregeanus
( Spies 2960 ); b & c, Pentaschistis tomentella ( Spies 2985). d, P .
tomentella ( Spies 2996). A, B-chromosomes; B, anaphase
bridges. All X 1260.
FIGURE 8. — Meiotic chromosomes in a & b, Pentaschistis angulata ( Spies 3178)', c, Pentaschistis angulata (Spies 3184); d, Schismus
barbatus ( Spies 2939); e, Centropodia glauca ( Spies 2909). B, telophase bridge; L, chromosome laggard; Q, quadrivalent; U,
univalent. All x 1450.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
121
has x = 6 rather than 12, as 54 is not divisible by 12.
However, the meiotic chromosome configuration con-
sisting of bivalents only, contradicts an uneven polyploid
level. The meiotic chromosome pairing suggests an even
polyploid level, for example 2n = 6x = 54. The pre-
sence of up to three anaphase bridges per cell in 80 % of
the anaphase I cells (Figure 7a) indicates karyotype evo-
lution in this specimen. Further studies are therefore nec-
essary to determine whether two different basic chromo-
some numbers are present in this genus or if an abnormal
specimen was studied.
The classification of specimens of the genus Penta-
schistis follows the preliminary suggestions of Dr H. P.
Linder (Bolus Herbarium, University of Cape Town)
(Spies & Du Plessis 1988). All the specimens studied
have x = 7, with the majority being tetraploids with n =
14. The only exceptions are P. angulata, which has the
very high ploidy levels of n = 42 and 91/2, and a diploid
P. tomentella specimen with n = 7. The chromosome
numbers reported for P. angulata, P. angustifolia , P.
capillaris, P . patuliflora and P. rupestris are the first for
the respective species.
In the P. angulata specimen (Spies 3178) with n = 42
a meiotic chromosome configuration of 7j 33u lm 2JV
was observed during metaphase I (Figure 8a & b). Dur-
ing anaphase I the majority of cells (90 %) have two to
four anaphase laggards (Figure 8a). Chromosome lag-
gards may result in the reduced fertility of the plant and
aneuploidy may also occur in its progeny. Secondary
association occurred during anaphase I.
The highest chromosome number so far known in
Pentaschistis, is that of Spies 3184 with 2n = 1 3x = 91 .
Univalents and multivalents are to be expected in a plant
with such a high ploidy level due to competition during
chromosome pairing (Spies & Du Plessis 1988). Analy-
sis of metaphase I cells gave a median chromosome con-
figuration of 7j 38n 2IV (Figure 8c). Although the two
quadrivalents indicate a certain degree of homology or at
least homoeology, the frequency and the number of
chromosomes per multivalent are too low to suggest
autoploidy. Autoploidy is also not expected in a plant
with such a high ploidy level, because autoploidy leads
to meiotic instability and consequently to sterility (Swan-
son et al. 1967; Stebbins 1971). Two to six chromosome
laggards were observed during anaphase I in 90 % of the
cells studied. Secondary association between the chro-
mosomes was also observed during anaphase I.
In P. angustifolia specimens with n = 2x =14, one
specimen (Spies 3103) had normal meiosis with 14n
whereas the second specimen (Spies 3239), which also
formed only bivalents, had up to two anaphase bridges in
80 % of the cells studied. These bridges indicate karyo-
type evolution due to paracentric inversions. Further
studies will reveal whether the karyotype evolution
originated in this individual, or if it is the result of cross-
fertilization between divergent taxa within the genus.
In P. patuliflora 0—2 B-chromosomes were present.
No size differences or differences in regard to chromo-
some behaviour between the A and B-chromosomes
were observed.
Despite the apparent normal chromosome pairing and
bivalent formation in the P. rupestris specimen (n = 2x
= 14), paracentric inversions resulted in an anaphase
bridge in 50 % of the cells analysed. The causes and
implications of this phenomenon need further investiga-
tion.
Two specimens of P. tomentella were studied. One
specimen (Spies 2985) had n = 7 (Figures 7b & c),
whereas the other specimen (Spies 2996) had a chromo-
some number of 28 + 2 B-chromosomes. The B-chro-
mosomes were larger and they stained lighter than the A-
chromosomes (Figures 7d & 9). During anaphase I a
14—16 segregation of the chromosomes was observed
and both B-chromosomes segregated towards the same
pole (Figures 7d & 9). No meiotic abnormalities were
observed in either the A or the B-chromosomes. Both
specimens have a basic chromosome number of seven.
FIGURE 9. — Anaphase chromosomes in Penta-
schistis tomentella ( Spies 2996). A, B-chromo-
somes. All x 1450.
This is the first chromosome number reported for both
Karroochloa schismoides (n = 12) and Merxmuellera
rangei (Spies 2934), which had n = 18 with normal
meiosis, except for a fragment in one cell. This result
corroborates the suggested base number of x = 6 by
Watson et al. (1986), although we have previously
(Spies & Du Plessis 1988) determined M. dura to have n
= 4x = 28 which suggests x = 7. Therefore, as cur-
rently constituted, two basic chromosome numbers occur
in this genus.
Our results indicate that Schismus barbatus, x = 6,
forms a polyploid complex. One diploid, three tetraploid
and one hexaploid specimens were observed. They all
formed bivalents during meiosis and, with the exception
of the hexaploid specimen (Spies 2939), no abnormal-
ities were observed. However, in this specimen up to
four anaphase bridges per cell were present. At least one
anaphase bridge was present in 80 % of the cells studied,
as well as a telophase bridge (Figure 8d). The high inci-
dence of more than one bridge per cell may be attributed
to hybridization between individuals in which paracen-
tric inversions have already occurred. Stebbins (1971)
claims that the occurrence of bridges is not very regular
in true species, but they are more frequent in inter-
specific hybrids. Crossing over in the inversion region
will only take place if the inversion is large enough, so it
can be assumed that the inversions were larger than nor-
mal.
122
Two specimens of Centropodia glauca [— Asthena-
therum glaucum (Nees) Nevski or Danthonia glauca
Nees] have n = 3x = 24 (Figure 8e) and both have a
normal meiosis. This first report for the genus indicates a
base number of x = 6.
Andropogoneae
The results of this study confirm x = 10 for this tribe.
Previous studies by Spies & Du Plessis (1986b, 1987a &
b) of other South African Cymbopogon species agree
with the results of n = 20 for Cymbopogon plurinodis
and the first C. marginatus specimen reported here.
This first cytogenetic study of Hyparrhenia anamesa
indicated that both specimens had n = 20. One specimen
(Spies 3200) had two to four telophase laggards of 90 %
of the meiotic cells, whereas the other specimen ( Spies
3263) had a normal meiosis. These chromosome num-
bers agree with previous studies of other South African
representatives of Hyparrhenia by Spies & Du Plessis
(1986b, 1987a & b). '
According to Watson et al. (1986) there are two basic
chromosome numbers for the genus Hemarthria, namely
9 and 10. Somatic chromosome numbers of 20 (De Wet
1954; De Wet & Anderson 1956), 18 & 36 (Quesenberry
et al. 1982) have been reported for Hemarthria altis-
sima. We found one collection to have n = 10.
Themeda triandra (Spies 3087) has n = 15, indicating
that it is a triploid based on x = 10 (Watson et al. 1986).
Analysis of metaphase I cells indicated that chromosome
configurations varied from 5j 5n 5m to 2j 2n 8m> The
high frequency of multivalents suggest that this plant is
an autoploid.
Paniceae
The genus Leucophrys is represented by only one
species in South Africa (Gibbs Russell et al. 1985). The
chromosome number of n = 3x = 27 for Leucophrys
mesocoma is the first chromosome number reported for
this genus. This indicates a basic number of 9, which
corresponds with the most frequent basic chromosome
number for this tribe.
The Cenchrus ciliaris specimen (Spies 2935) studied
had a somatic chromosome number of 54 and a normal
meiosis. All previous C. ciliaris specimens we have
studied (Spies & Du Plessis 1986b, 1987a & b) were
aneuploids with abnormal meioses. The extent of
aneuploidy and relevant literature are listed by Spies &
Du Plessis (1988).
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
A chromosome number of 36 was observed for Tri-
cholaena capensis (Spies 2925). This is the first chromo-
some number reported for this species. The base number
for this genus appears to be 9 (Watson et al. 1986) which
is confirmed by T. monachne (Spies & Du Plessis
1986a).
REFERENCES
DARLINGTON, C. D. & WYLIE, A. P. 1955. Chromosome atlas of
flowering plants. Allen & Unwin, London.
DE WET, J. M. J. 1954. Chromosome numbers of a few South African
grasses. Cytologia 19: 97- 103.
DE WET, J. M. J. & ANDERSON, L. J. 1956. Chromosome numbers
in Transvaal grasses. Cytologia 21 : 1-10.
FEDOROV, A. A. 1969. Chromosome numbers of flowering plants.
Academy of Science, USSR, Leningrad.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G. E., REID, C., VAN ROOY, J. & SMOOK, L.
1985. List of species of southern African plants, edn 2, part 1.
Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 51: 1 — 152.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1981 — 1985. Index to plant chromosome numbers
1975- 1983. Monographs of Systematic Botany 5; 8; 13.
MOORE, R. J. 1970-1977. Index to plant chromosome numbers for
1968— 1974. Regnum Vegetabile 68; 77; 84; 91; 96.
MOORE, R. J. 1973. Index to plant chromosome numbers for
1967-1971 . Oosthoek Uitgevers, Utrecht.
ORNDUFF, R. 1967-1969. Index to plant chromosome numbers for
1965— 1967. Regnum Vegetabile 50; 55; 59.
QUESENBERRY, K. H., OAKES, A. J. & JESSOP, D. S. 1982.
Cytological and geographical characterizations of Hemarthria.
Euphytica 3 1 : 409—416.
SPIES, J. J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1986a. Chromosome studies on
African plants. 1 . Bothalia 16: 87-88.
SPIES, J. J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1986b. Chromosome studies on
African plants. 2. Bothalia 16: 269-270.
SPIES, J. J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1987a. Chromosome studies on
African plants. 3. Bothalia 17: 131-135.
SPIES, J. J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1987b. Chromosome studies on
African plants. 5. Bothalia 17: 257-259.
SPIES, J. J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1988. Chromosome studies on Afri-
can plants. 6. Bothalia 18: 1 1 1-1 14.
SPIES, J. J. & VOGES, S. P. 1988. Chromosome studies on African
plants. 7. Bothalia 18: 1 14-1 19.
STEBBINS, G. L. 1971. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants.
Edward Arnold, London.
SWANSON, C. P., MERZ, T. & YOUNG, W. J. 1967. Cytogenetics.
Prentice-Hall, London.
WATSON, L., DALLWITZ, M. J. & JOHNSTON, C. R.
1986. Grass genera of the world: 720 detailed descriptions from
an automated database. Australian Journal of Botany 34:
223-230.
H. DU PLESSIS* and J. J. SPIES*
* Botanical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and Water
Supply, Private Bag X 101 , Pretoria 000 1 , RSA.
MS. received: Oct. 1987.
NEW PROGRAMS FOR PRELIMINARY SEQUENCING OF RELEVES AND SPECIES IN PHYTOSOCIOLOGICAL DATA SETS
The primary aim of phytosociological classifications
is to group releves into vegetation units with these units
arranged according to the closest possible floristic
relationships. The secondary aim of classifications is to
group species in a manner which will clarify these
relationships. If the spaces between the first and last
occurrence of a species in a phytosociological matrix are
regarded as separation units then the primary aim is
achieved when the sum of the total separation units for
each species is a minimum. Even currently available
mainframe computers preclude use of this method of
classification for all but the smallest data sets, because
the calculations required are a factorial of the number of
releves.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
123
The programs TWINSPAN (Hill 1979), a polythetic
divisive classification and PHYTO 20 (Westfall et al.
1982), a polythetic agglomerative classification, for pre-
liminary sequencing, attempt to achieve the aims of clas-
sification using algorithms suited to available computers.
It is unlikely that the same solution could be achieved
with the two programs on the same data set and a
considerable variation in separation units could be
expected. Releve and species sequences with both pro-
grams often require considerable refinement before a
pattern approximating that with the minimum number of
summed separation units is achieved. However, user
refinement of sequences can be time-consuming mainly
because pattern detection is hampered by species whose
distribution is little affected by environmental factors
within a given study area. These are the so-called non-
diagnostic species. A new approach was therefore
attempted to overcome the problem of non-diagnostic
species recognition and to facilitate user sequencing for
pattern refinement.
The new program, PHYTO 21, is written in PL/1 for
the Burroughs B7900 and uses a simple polythetic divi-
sive technique. It is an addition to the PHYTOTAB pro-
gram package (Westfall et al. 1982). An assumption that
final releve sequence is primarily dependent on species
with an occurrence of less than 50 % in the releves of the
data set, is made.
The releves of the first species with 50 % occurrence
are concatenated as are the releves of the species with the
highest occurrence that do not occur in the releves of the
first species. The matrix is thus divided into two
extremes and can have intermediate releves. The total
number of species occurring only within the matrix range
of both the concatenated species is determined. The pro-
cess is repeated using the species with the next highest
occurrence to the first species. It is assumed that the
highest total represents division of the matrix into the
greatest extremes. In practice it was found that the
number of iterations could be limited.
Species are then sequenced to form seven groups: 1 ,
those occurring only in the left part of the matrix; 2,
those in the right; 3, those in the middle; 4, those in the
left and middle; 5, those in the right and middle; 6, those
in the left, middle and right; and 7, those with 100 % or
single occurrences. The matrix, with releves arranged
according to extremes and species according to relative
distribution in the matrix, is consequently easy to refine.
Printed output of the new program is a list of absolute
and percentage frequency of occurrence for each species
as well as the number of species per releve and the
number of species in each releve as a percentage of the
total number of species in the data set. The program also
creates species and releve sequence files. A matrix is
obtained using PHYTO 30 (Westfall et al. 1982).
PHYTO 30 (Westfall et al. 1982) has been amended
to give separation units for each species as well as the
total number of separation units for the matrix. This
facilitates pattern formation and allows an objective
comparison of classifications for the same data set.
Classification, especially of large data sets, can often
be facilitated by re-running PHYTO 21 on subsets of the
data set. This can be achieved with the new program
PHYTO 15, which also forms part of the PHYTOTAB
program package (Westfall et al. 1982). Input for this
program consists of species numbers that are required to
be omitted. The program then creates a new data set file
consisting of a subset of the original data set. Other
programs including PHYTO 20 and TWINSPAN can
also be run on the subsets.
The basic input program, PHYTO 10 (Westfall et al.
1982), must first be run on each new subset before other
programs can be run. PHYTO 10 has also been amended
to check the cover-abundance codes used. This requires
an additional input line, namely, the codes used for a
particular data set.
The addition of the new programs to the package
should greatly facilitate classifications, especially of
large data sets (up to 2 000 releves by 2 000 species).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank Dr J. C. Scheepers for comments
and suggestions.
REFERENCES
HILL, M. O. 1979. TWINSPAN— a FORTRAN program for arranging
multivariate data in an ordered two way table by classification of
individuals and attributes. Ecology and Systematics, Cornell Uni-
versity, Ithaca, New York.
WESTFALL, R. H., DEDNAM, G., VAN ROOYEN, N. & THE-
RON, G. K. 1982. PHYTOTAB. A program package for Braun-
Blanquet tables. Vegetatio 49: 35 — 37.
R. H. WESTFALL and B. C. DE WET
MS. received: 1987.09.29.
Bothalia 18,1: 125-130(1988)
The identification of ‘Isicakathi’ and its medicinal use in Transkei
R. N. BOLOFO* and C. T. JOHNSON**
Keywords: ethnobotany, Isicakathi, medicinal plants, Transkei
ABSTRACT
A study was undertaken in six districts of Transkei. The object of this research was to identify and review the state of
knowledge of plants used in the medicine known as ‘Isicakathi’. Present utlization of the plants is considered.
UITTREKSEL
’n Ondersoek in ses distrikte van Transkei is ondemeem. Die doel van die navorsing was om die medisinale plante
bekend as ‘Isicakathi’ te identifiseer en die kennis omtrent die kompleks te hersien. Huidige gebruik van die plante word
ook gegee.
INTRODUCTION
Transkei has a variety of plants which people use for
food, medicine, magic, ritual and customs, building
material, household utensils and implements, musical
instruments, firewood and firesticks. The use of this raw
material is traditional to the people and, moreover, offers
a cheaper way of life. Seeing that much of this folk
culture is vanishing before the advancing tide of western-
ization, we set ourselves the task of recording some in-
formation on the traditional uses of plants.
Transkei is populated mainly by Xhosas (with a mino-
rity of Sothos) and has been divided into 28 magisterial
districts. These districts are occupied by people belong-
ing to a number of ethnic groups, each with its own
tradition and customs. In order to determine the plant
taxa known as ‘Isicakathi’ and to gather ethnic tradi-
tions, six study areas were selected, which are inhabited
by different ethnic groups (see Research Procedure).
‘Isicakathi’ is one of the most important medicines
used in the Transkei. It is the first medicine that is given
to the Xhosa baby immediately after birth or used by the
expectant mother from about three months before the
baby is born. The use of this medicine poses a number of
questions that are of interdisciplinary interest.
NOMENCLATURE
The name ‘Isicakathi’ is a general and collective name
and the Sotho equivalent is ‘Pitsa ya tshila’. Some of the
species used in ‘Isicakathi’ are listed in Table 1. More
than one name may be used in the same area, for exam-
ple Helichrysum pedunculatum ‘Indlebe zebhokhwe’ or
Tsicwe’. On the other hand, different names may be
used for the same species. For instance Ledebouria is
known as ‘uMasixabane’ in Engcobo, Tsihlambezo’ in
Umtata, and ‘Letywetlane’ or ‘Bokhoe’ in Maluti. The
problem becomes more complicated and further in-
creases as the same name is used for different species.
Both the Pondos and Tembus use the name Tsihlam-
bezo’, referring to Ledebouria sp. and Agapanthus sp.
respectively.
* Botany Department, University of Transkei, Private Bag X5092,
Umtata.
** Botany Department, University of Western Cape, Private Bag X17,
Bellville.
MS. received: 1986. 1 1 .27.
TABLE 1. — Plants used in each district
Name of species
Commelina africana
Agapanthus sp.
Chlorophytum comosum
Ledebouria sp.
Ranunculus multifidus
Thunbergia atriplicifolia
Kohautia amatymbica
Plantago major
Gazania linearis
Helichrysum pedunculatum
Senecio coronatus
District
• species used
- species not used
PREVIOUS RECORDS
The medicinal use of ‘Isicakathi’ has been reported by
a number of researchers such as Watt & Breyer-Brand-
wijk (1932, 1962), Batten & Bokelmann (1966) and
Lamia (1981). They, however, only mention the use of
this medicine very briefly. Smith, quoted in Watt &
Breyer-Brandwijk (1962), states that a paste of Tsicaka-
thi/uSikiki ' , identified as Salvia scabra, made with
mother’s milk, is given as the first medicine to Xhosa
infants. Walter (Watt & Breyer-Brandwijk 1962), men-
tions that the root of this plant is soaked in water, and
that some of the water is given daily to the new-born for
about two months. Hewat (Watt & Breyer-Brandwijk
1962) states that the leaf paste is given as a purgative.
An infusion of the tuber of Chlorophytum sp. (Watt &
Breyer-Brandwijk 1932, 1962) is administered to the
suckling infant to stimulate growth. Batten & Bokel-
mann (1966) state that an infusion of the tuber of Chloro-
phytum comosum is given to the infant on the day of birth
as a purgative, and that it is used as an aperient with
infants generally. Lamia (1981), in his study of the tra-
dional healers and their medicines in Transkei, recorded
that ‘Isicakathi’, also called ‘Umkhondo’, is used to in-
126
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
duce vomiting. The roots are ground and then mixed
with warm water and the patient drinks the medicine.
Lamia was not able to identify the plants in question.
RESEARCH PROCEDURE
Six districts were chosen as the study area (Figure 1).
They were the following: Engcobo, Umtata and Mqan-
duli, which are all occupied by Tembus; Libode and
Bizana which are Pondo areas; and Maluti, occupied by
Sothos and Hlubis.
In addition to house interviews, conducted in the study
area, interviews were carried out at clinics in the districts
of Bizana and Maluti. To assist us in our interviews,
herbarium specimens were kept at hand for identification
purposes. The voucher specimens were compared with
specimens housed in the herbarium of the University of
Natal (NU), Pietermaritzburg. In order to establish the
localities and distribution of the species in question, a
number of herbaria were visited.
'ISICAKATHE PLANTS
Eleven species, namely Commelina africana L.; Aga-
panthus sp., Chlorophytum comosum (Harv.) Jacq.,
Ledebouria sp.. Ranunculus multifidus Forssk., Thun-
bergia atriplicifolia E. Mey. ex Nees, Kohautia ama-
tymbica Eckl. & Zeyh., Plantago major L., Gazania
linearis (Thunb.) Druce, Helichrysum pedunculatum
Hilliard & Burtt and Senecio coronatus Harv., belonging
to 1 1 genera of seven families, were collected. Four of
the species are monocots and seven are dicots.
These species, known and used as ‘ Isicakathi’ , may be
used for other purposes either by the same or by different
people. These purposes are given below.
Commelinaceae
Commelina africana L. ‘Isicakathi sehagu’
Vouchers: TRANSKEI. — 3128 Engcobo (-CB): Bolofo S16 (KE1);
Umtata (-DB): Bolofo S6 (KEI). 3129 Libode (— CA): Bolofo SI5
(KEI). Figure 2.
FIGURE 1 . — Magisterial districts of
Transkei; study areas are shaded.
Liliaceae
Agapanthus sp. ‘Isihlambezo, umGwebeleni’.
Voucher: TRANSKEI. — 3129 Lupatana (-BB): Cawe 341 (KEI).
The vegetative material collected was impossible to
identify to species level. The genus, which is widely
distributed in Transkei, is represented here by A. cam-
panulatus Leighton, A. minor Lodd., A. praecox subsp.
orientalis (Leighton) Leighton and A. umbellatus
L’Herit.
Of all the ‘Isicakathi’ identified, Agapanthus is the
only one that is used by the expectant mother. The ex-
pectant mother starts using the medication when she is
about six months pregnant until she delivers. The plant is
grown in a large beaker of water and she drinks half a
cup of this water every morning and evening. It is be-
lieved that the health of the unborn baby can be judged
by the manner in which the plant grows. Vigorous
growth of the plant is an indication of a healthy unborn
baby. If the plant dies it is accepted that the baby will
also die. Watt & Breyer-Brandwijk (1962) state that
Pondo women grow A. africanus. A decoction of the
roots of A. africanus and Typha sp. is used in the same
manner (Watt & Breyer-Brandwijk 1962).
Chlorophytum comosum (Thunb.) Jacq. ‘uJejane,
uJiyane’.
Voucher: TRANSKEI.— 3128 Mqanduli, Wilo (-AD): Bolofo SI4
(KEI); Umtata (-DB): Bolofo S9( KEI). Figure 2.
Ledebouria sp. ‘Letywetlane’ (Sotho), ‘Isihlambezo,
uMasixabane, Bokhoe’.
Voucher: TRANSKEI.— 3128 Engcobo (-CB): Bolofo S3 (KEI).
The vegetative material collected could not be identi-
fied to species level. This genus is widely distributed and
the species found in Transkei are L. apertiflora (Bak.)
Jessop, L. cooperi (Hook, f.) Jessop, L. floribunda
(Bak.) Jessop, L. ovatifolia (Bak.) Jessop and L. revo-
luta (L. f.) Jessop.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
127
FIGURE 2. — Distribution map of Chlorophytum comosum, ★; Com-
melina africana, (f: and Helichrysum pedunculatum , ☆.
FIGURE 4. — Distribution map of Thunbergia airiplicifolia , and
Senecio coronatus, f).
Ranunculaceae
Ranunculus multifidus Forssk. Thlapi’ (Sotho).
Vouchers: TRANSKEI. — 3028 Maluti, Queen's Mercy (-BA): Bo-
lofo S13 (KEI). 3128 Engcobo, Buswayo Forest (— CB): Johnson 266
(KEI); Mnyolo: Johnson 1618 (KEI). Figure 3.
In Maluti the plant has a variety of uses, these are: a
cure for epileptic fits in adults; to treat lung problems; for
the relief of toothache; as a cosmetic.
Acanthaceae
Thunbergia atriplicifolia E. Mey. ex Nees
Vouchers: TRANSKEI. — 3128 Umtata, Unitra campus (-DB):
BolofoS17 (KEI);Tso!o, Gxididi: BolofoS7 (KEI). Figure 4.
Plantaginaceae
Plantago major L.
Voucher: TRANSKEI. — 3128 Engcobo, Ndungunyeni (-CB):
BolofoSl (KEI).
Rubiaceae
Kohautia amatymbica Eckl. & Zeyh. ‘Dirosare’ (Sotho),
‘Mohlatsisa iKhubalo elimnyama labaNtwana’.
Vouchers: TRANSKEI.— 3028 Maluti, Queen's Mercy (-BA):
Bolofo Sll (KEI). 3128 Mjika, Bele side of Nqadu Forest (-BC):
Hutchings 1293 (KEI). Figure 3.
FIGURE 3. — Distribution map of Gazania linearis, it, Kohautia am-
atymbica, <0; and Ranunculus multifidus, ☆.
Watt & Breyer-Brandwijk (1962) mention this as one
of the medicines used by the Sotho against sterility. The
root is generally known as an emetic, hence the Sotho
name ‘Mohlatsisa’.
Asteraceae
Helichrysum pedunculatum Hilliard & Burtt ‘Indlebe
zebhokwe, isiCwe, uNdleleni, isiGqutsi’.
Vouchers: TRANSKEI. — 3128 Engcobo, Ndungunyeni (— CB ):
Bolofo S2 (KEI); Umtata (-DB): Johnson 156, Bolofo SI8 (KEI). 3129
Libode, Moyeni(-CA): Bolofo S19 (KEI). Figure 2.
‘Indlebe zebhokwe, isicwe’ is applied as a dressing on
the wound after circumcision. This is done to prevent
inflammation and to prevent the wound from becoming
septic.
Senecio coronatus Harv. Tyeza lamasi’.
Voucher: TRANSKEI.— 3128 Umtata (-DB): Bolofo S8 (KEI).
Figure 4.
A teaspoonful of the powdered dry roots mixed with
half a tin of blue butter and a teaspoon of ‘Umvutuza’
(not determined) serves as a cream to get rid of pubic
lice. Sothos used it as an emetic or sometimes mixed it
with their tobacco (Watt & Breyer-Brandwijk 1932).
Gazania linearis (Thunb.) Druce ‘Tsikitlane’ (Sotho),
‘uBendle, uHlubi’.
Voucher: TRANSKEI. — 3028 Maluti, Nchodu (-BA): Bolofo S12
(KEI). Figure 3.
The Sotho grind the roots and mix them with those of
other plants (not determined) and the paste is applied to
small cuts that are made on the body in the vicinity of the
joints. This is to protect the person against evil spirits.
The abaxial epidermis of the leaves which is very tough
is peeled and twisted, and coloured beads are threaded
on it to make a small skirt for young Sotho girls. Batten
& Bokelmann (1966) made a similar report for Xhosas.
DISTRICTS AND PLANT USE
The eleven species used as ‘Isicakathi’ occur through-
out Transkei (Figures 2, 3 & 4). From the interviews it
became evident that each district is characterized by its
own ‘Isicakathi’ (Table 1). This implies that each tribe
has its own traditions.
128
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
Engcobo
The greatest number of plant species used as Tsicaka-
thi' has been collected from Engcobo. Each family uses
its particular plant and sometimes totally disagrees about
the use of any other plant. In most families even the
children could identify the plant used by their family. As
the knowledge of the plant and the use of the medicine is
quite extensive the medicine is not usually purchased.
The plants used are Chlorophytum comosum, ‘uJejane’
or ‘uJiyane’; Commelina africana; Helichrysum pedun-
culatum , Xhosa: ‘uNdleleni’; Agapanthus sp.; Ledebou-
ria sp., Xhosa: ‘uMasixabane’ and Plantago major. For
the additional use of Tulbaghia dieterlenii see under
Maluti.
Umtata
There is still a fair knowledge of this medicine in the
rural areas. People staying in the urban areas have lost
track of the identity and use of this medicine even if they
happen to remember its existence. Tsicakathi’ is dis-
pensed as one of the herbal medicines in various herbal-
ist shops in Umtata. In addition, dried plant material of
Senecio coronatus is also sold as Tsicakathi’. However,
there is much controversy about the use of this plant. As
denoted by its other Xhosa name Tyeza lamasi’, it is
claimed that it is given to an older child when breast-
feeding is stopped. In this case it is supposed to ‘clean
and remove' all the sour milk from the baby’s bowel.
This is regarded as being different from the general use
of Tsicakathi’. There is, however, still a large proportion
of people who buy it from the herbalist and use it as
Tsicakathi’. Rose (1972) stated that this plant is also
called Tyeza lomoya’ and is used as a purgative for
weaning babies or as an enema. For the other Tsicakathi'
plants collected in this district see Table 1. The use of
Tulbaghia dieterlenii is discussed under Maluti.
Mqanduli
In this district, inhabited mainly by Tembu, the fol-
lowing plant species were found to be used as Tsicaka-
thi’: Commelina africana and Chlorophytum comosum.
Libode
Three species, Commelina africana, Chlorophytum
comosum and Agapanthus sp. are in use in this district
but only one, Commelina africana, is sometimes called
Tsicakathi sehagu’ because it is eaten by pigs.
Bizana
Seeing that in this district interviews were held only in
clinics, very little information could be obtained on the
plant species used. This can be ascribed to the presence
of nurses in front of whom people were afraid to admit
that they even know this medicine, let alone use it. The
name Tsicakathi’ is not known, instead Tsihlambezo’ is
used. Though some of the people interviewed here do
use this medicine, they could not identify the plants. The
most common way of obtaining the medicine is from the
herbalist. The only plant that was collected is Ledebou-
ria sp.
Maluti
The people of this district have strong faith in this
medicine. Here the collective name ‘Pitsa ya tshila' or
‘Sethlare sa tshila’ are used to describe all medicinal
plants that are used to get rid of impurities. Each species.
however, still has its specific name. The plants that are
commonly in use are: Gazania linearis, Sotho: ‘Tsiki-
tlane'; Kohautia amatymbica, Sotho: ‘Dirosare’; Lede-
bouria sp., Sotho: ‘Letjwetlane, Bokhoe’ and Ranuncu-
lus multifidus, Sotho: ‘Thlapi’. The herbs are either used
individually or, when it is necessary to prepare a stronger
mixture, are mixed in various combinations. Kohautia
amatymbica is either mixed with Ranunculus multifidus
or with Gazania linearis. Ledebouria is considered
strong enough and is never mixed with any other plant.
The bulb of Tulbaghia dieterlenii, Sotho: ‘Sefothafo-
tha’; Xhosa: Tsivumbampunzi’, is commonly added to
any of these mixtures to drive away evil spirits from the
baby. In the districts of Umtata and Engcobo the entire
plant is ground, put on a clean cloth, water is added and
the solution is administered to the ears, nose and anus of
the baby. The plant, when used for this purpose, is called
‘Umkhamelo’.
Conclusion
Although the species in question are widely distrib-
uted (Figures 2, 3 & 4) in Transkei, the people are very
specific in what they use or regard as Tsicakathi’. The
question therefore arises as to what contributes to the
peculiar assemblage of plants that are in use (Table 1 ).
Gazania linearis, Kohautia amatymbica and Ranunculus
multifidus are only used by the Sothos of Maluti. The
Tembus of Engcobo and Umtata do know Gazania lin-
earis but do not attach any medicinal value to it. Batten
& Bokelmann (1966) state that Kohautia amatymbica is
used by the Xhosas for protection against evil spirits. In
Engcobo Ranunculus is used for making tea. The three
herbs are therefore only recognized as Tsicakathi’ by the
Sothos.
Agapanthus, Commelina africana and Chlorophytum
comosum are used in the districts of Engcobo, Mquan-
duli, Umtata and Libode. The first three are Tembu
areas, the fourth a Pondo area. Considering the fact that
Libode is situated very close to the Tembu areas, it can
be assumed that the use of these plants in Libode is due
to an influence from this close association with the Tem-
bus. On the other hand, it should be noted that Ledebou-
ria is used in Bizana, Engcobo and Maluti, which are
very far apart and occupied by Pondos, Tembus and
Sothos respectively. The use of a common plant by these
people cannot be easily explained but is probably related
to migration of people from one place to another who
introduce new medicinal herb remedies to the area. Her-
balists, in particular, travel extensively for training and
during their collecting trips introduce these remedies.
CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND USE
Knowledge of the plants
From the interviews conducted it soon emerged that it
is mainly the married women with children who are
familiar with the use of Tsicakathi’. They are much more
forthcoming in passing on their herbal knowledge than
men. The few men that were able to identify the plants,
were all herbalists and they were reluctant to divulge
information on collecting, preparation and dispensing of
the drug.
From a total of 120 families (households) interviewed,
89 % are familiar with the medicine, and 58 % have used
it. A small percentage (10 %) of the users do not know
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
129
why they have to use the medicine, but use it on instruc-
tion from their mothers or mothers-in-law. Of the users
only 33 % could identify the plants in question, and are
therefore able to collect and prepare the medicine them-
selves. The users are young mothers between the ages
18—27, while it is the older women, usually mothers-in-
law, who collect the herb.
Preparation and dosage
A handful of the roots is thoroughly cleaned and pre-
pared by one or two procedures. The plant material is
boiled for about five minutes or soaked in boiled water.
The decoction is strained and kept in a closed bottle.
Administering of the medicine varies considerably, but
usually the infant is given either one or two tablespoons
three times a day; or the medicine is alternated with
breast-feeding, and is therefore administered as a supple-
mentary meal.
No other nourishment, except breast-feeding, is nor-
mally given to the infant. Depending on the effect of the
medicine, the concentration is either decreased or in-
creased. The time at which the medicine is administered
also varies considerably; it is either given immediately
after birth or at any time thereafter. Treatment lasts from
between two weeks to five months.
Reasons for administering ‘Isicakathi’
Nine reasons for administering ‘Isicakathi’ were deter-
mined:
1, to serve as an aperient that facilitates the discharge
of meconium stools, Xhosa: ‘Ijengezi/Ijekezi’. Though
this does happen naturally, it is believed that the system
is not efficient enough and needs to be assisted;
2, every newborn baby is believed to have a rash in-
side its body. This medicine is also used to promote the
appearance of that rash on the surface of the body (re-
ferred to as ‘Ishimnca’) so that the rash does not ‘block’
the baby’s ears and eyes;
3, to prevent the blocking of the respiratory system;
4, to stimulate appetite and to make the baby strong;
5, to serve as a meal that is alternated with breast-
feeding;
6, to counteract constipation and wind;
7, it is believed that when breast-feeding, the mother’s
milk sometimes turns sour in the child’s bowel. This
medicine is used to counteract that;
8, the medicine is taken to ensure easy childbirth, a
healthy child and/or that the child does not develop
bowel trouble;
9, the medicine is given with the strong belief that it is
the first medicine that must be given to the child.
Illnesses attributed to failure to administer 'Isicakathi'
In contrast to the above, certain illnesses are attributed
to failure to administer ‘Isicakathi’ to the baby:
1 , the baby may lose its appetite and become very thin
and weak. ‘This results in a baby that looks much older
than its actual age’. According to a herbalist in Umtata
‘people may interpret such symptoms as ‘Kwashiokor’
or tuberculosis but these symptoms are actually effects of
impure blood’;
2, meconium and/or sour milk from the mother is
stored in the baby’s bowel resulting in ongoing stomach
disturbances. The baby’s stomach becomes distended
and the baby suffers from colic cramps and sharp pains.
‘If these are not stored in the stomach, they may be
transferred to the back and that results in the devel-
opment of a hunchback’;
3, green veins develop on the baby’s distended sto-
mach as a result of impurities in its system. At that time
the baby may have black or green thread-like stools and
these may be accompanied by vomiting. The result is a
very restless and fretful baby, with yellow eyes and
sometimes a yellow colouration of the skin. This condi-
tion is referred to as ‘Plate’;
4, failure of after-birth-rash to appear may result in a
condition referred to as Thashe’. The baby’s ears and
eyes are blocked by the internal rash and these may be-
come septic. Alternatively, the baby may develop sores
on the face especially at the backs of the ears. If this
condition is not treated immediately, this may result in
deafness and blindness.
Of the households interviewed 35 % are of the opinion
that treatment with ‘Isicakathi’ is the only cure for the
above illnesses. Three percent of the users were instruc-
ted by the herbalist to use this treatment to prevent evil
spirits from inflicting harm to the infant. Of the users
25 % continued with the administering of the herbal
medicine while having the child under the care of a doc-
tor or visiting a clinic.
ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE
‘Isicakathi’ is undoubtedly one of the most important
medicines used in Transkei. Though it is mostly freely
available, 66 % of the users are unable to identify and
collect the herbs themselves. The main suppliers are
therefore the traditional practitioners. A handful of roots,
or one bottle (750 ml) of medicine, is sold for about
Rl.00-R2.00. Chlorophytum comosum, only occurs in
indigenous forests which are not easily accessible for the
ordinary man. This fact makes the herb very expensive
and it is therefore sold at a price range of between R5,00
to R6,00. Great value is attached to these medicinal
plants, especially by the herbalists to whom they are a
source of wealth. A herbalist in Engcobo was prepared to
divulge information about the locality of the plant only if
she was paid R 14,00. In Maluti a herbalist demanded a
live herd of cattle if one is to be shown the plant.
According to the latter the fee is a way of appeasing the
ancestors who will obviously be against their divulging
this information.
CONCLUSIONS
It is evident from the interviews that the knowledge
and use of ‘Isicakathi’ is gradually diminishing. In the
rural areas, it is the older women who are familiar with
the use of the medicine. The younger ones do not show
much interest and they do not seem to attach as much
importance to the medicine as do the older ones. Even if
they do use it, it is usually prepared by their elders.
The tribes and inhabitants of the districts are very
distinct and each ethnic group tends to stick to its tradi-
tion. However, some overlapping does exist as a result
of side influences such as marriages and migration of
people and herbalists.
130
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
Looking at the number of species collected from less
than a quarter of the districts of Transkei, one is inclined
to suspect that there should be many more species that
are used as ‘Isicakathi’ in Transkei.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The first author wishes to express her heartfelt grati-
tude for willing assistance received from colleagues in
the Department of Botany at the University of Transkei.
The authors wish to express their appreciation to the
inhabitants and informants of the various districts of
Transkei who were willing to share their knowledge on
this subject. We gratefully acknowledge the assistance
received from the Director and Staff of Bolus Herbarium
of the University of Cape Town and to Prof. O. M.
Hilliard, formerly of the herbarium of the University of
Natal, Pietermaritzburg for assisting with the identifica-
tion of some specimens. A special word of thanks to
Belinda Ferris for typing the manuscript.
REFERENCES
BATTEN, A. & BOKELMANN, H. 1966. Wild flowers of the eastern
Cape Province. Books of Africa.
LAMLA, M. A. 1981. Traditional healers and their medicine. Lumko
Occasional Paper 2, Cacadu, Transkei.
ROSE, E. F. 1972. Senecio species: toxic plants used as food and
medicine in the Transkei. South African Medical Journal 46:
1039-1043.
WATT, J. M. & BREYER-BRANDWIJK, M. G. 1932. The medicinal
and poisonous plants of southern Africa, 1st edn. Livingstone, Lon-
don.
WATT, J. M. & BREYER-BRANDWIJK, M. G. 1962. The medicinal
and poisonous plants of southern Africa. 2nd edn. Livingstone,
London.
Bothalia 18,1: 131-133(1988)
OBITUARY
ROBERT ALLEN DYER (1900-1987)
With the death of Dr R. A. Dyer in Johannesburg on
26 October 1987, South Africa lost one of its leading and
most respected plant taxonomists. His personal contribu-
tion to South African botany was considerable and,
under his wise guidance as Director from 1944 to 1963,
the Botanical Research Institute grew in stature and pro-
ductivity.
Robert Allen Dyer (Figure 1) was bom in Pieterma-
ritzburg on 21 September 1900 and was educated at Mer-
chiston and Michaelhouse schools in Natal. From 1919
to 1923 he attended Natal University College, graduating
with the degree ofM.Sc. under Professor J. W. Bews.
After a year as research worker with the Natal Sugar
Association, he was appointed in 1925 to the Division of
Botany and Plant Pathology in the Department of Agri-
culture. The Chief of the Division was then Dr I. B. Pole
Evans (Figure 2) who, in 1918, had brought together the
leading botanical personalities, including men such as
Bews, Marloth and Schonland, into a Botanical Survey
Advisory Committee, to co-ordinate the various research
activities concerning the country’s flora. Allen Dyer was
placed as assistant to Professor Schonland in Grahams-
town and may therefore be regarded as the first botanical
survey officer to be appointed. After Schonland’s retire-
ment in 1926, he was put in charge of the survey of the
eastern Cape and became Honorary Curator of the Al-
bany Museum Herbarium.
During his stay in Grahamstown he undertook a de-
tailed survey of the vegetation of the Albany and
Bathurst Districts, which later earned him the degree of
D.Sc. from the University of South Africa and which
was published as Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of
South Africa No. 17 (1937). It was also during this pe-
riod that he came in contact with the rich succulent flora
of the eastern Cape, which directed much of his later
research work towards groups such as the succulent Eu-
phorbieae, Stapelieae and Crassulaceae.
From 1931 to 1934 he served as South Africa’s liaison
officer at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, where he
made several life-long friends. On his return he was
stationed in the National Herbarium, Pretoria. In 1944 he
succeeded Dr E. P. Phillips (Figure 3) as Chief of the
Division of Botany (later renamed the Botanical Re-
search Institute) and Director of the Botanical Survey.
Under his wise and determined guidance, the Institute
showed a revival in activity and growth. One of his first
achievements was to re-activate the botanical survey by
obtaining the creation of four posts, thus forming for the
first time, an official Botanical Survey Section within the
Institute which, among other results, made possible the
production of the Veld Type map by J. P. H. Acocks.
This is probably the most frequently quoted ecological
publication in South Africa, with wide implications in
other fields, such as pasture management, land-use plan-
ning, nature conservation and zoological research.
His influence was also felt in the stimulus of taxo-
nomic and herbarium activities. The increased survey
work brought pressure to bear on the National Herbarium
and resulted in a useful symbiosis. Additional staff were
required for identifying the flow of specimens, while the
herbarium staff had greater facilities for field work con-
nected with their taxonomic problems. His vision of a
‘pan-African botanical policy’ was put forward in his
presidential address to Section C of the S. African Asso-
ciation for the Advancement of Science in 1942 and
steps were taken to acquire collections from tropical Af-
rican countries south of the Sahara. In 1956, following
negotiations with the Transvaal Museum, their important
herbarium was transferred to the National Herbarium. In
1960 the regional units, which had already been estab-
lished at Durban, Grahamstown and Kimberley, were
added to when Stellenbosch University agreed to their
herbarium being placed under State control.
The restricted area for the cultivation of indigenous
plants at the Institute’s headquarters in Pretoria resulted
in a search for a more suitable site and, as a result of
negotiations with the Pretoria University Agricultural
Faculty initiated in 1945, an ideal site for a botanic gar-
den, consisting of about 60 ha of the University Experi-
mental Farm east of Pretoria, was acquired. The land
was later purchased by the Government, together with
certain private properties between the northern boundary
of this area and the Silverton road, resulting in a unit
with inherent scenic properties and varying micro-cli-
mates. It also provided an appropriate site for a new
building for the Institute which Dr Dyer started planning
FIGURE 1 .—Dr R. A. Dyer (1900- 1987).
132
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
FIGURE 2. — Drs R. A. Dyer, I. B. Pole Evans and John Hutchinson
in Pretoria, ± 1953.
in 1950, but which materialized only several years after
his retirement as Director.
During his term of office as Director, Dr Dyer edited
the Institute’s publications, Bothalia, Memoirs of the
Botanical Survey of South Africa and Flowering Plants
of Africa. In addition he obtained the support of the
Department of Agriculture for the publication of an in-
ventory and description of our flora in a series entitled
Flora of southern Africa. The first volume, to which he
contributed the Myrsinaceae, Primulaceae and Plumba-
ginaceae, appeared in 1963. He also showed great
shrewdness in managing an independent fund, which he
had succeeded in creating, for the purchase of rare books
for the library without recourse to tender, something
almost unheard of in the public service.
After reaching the official retiring age in 1963, he was
re-appointed in a temporary capacity and served the
Institute for a further sixteen years, finally retiring in
1979. By this time he had over 450 scientific publica-
tions to his credit, more than 300 of which were texts for
Flowering Plants of Africa. Probably his best known
publication is The Succulent Euphorbieae , in two vo-
lumes with numerous habitat photographs taken by him-
self, produced in collaboration with White & Sloane in
1941. In the following year, all three authors received
the award of the Senior Capt. Scott Medal by the South
African Biological Society. Other major revisions dealt
with Cyrtanthus ( Herbertia 6: 65—103, 1940), Brunsvi-
gia (Plant Life 6: 63—83, 1950; 7: 45—64, 1951) and
Zamiaceae (Bothalia 8: 405-515, 1965, and, together
with I. C. Verdoom, in Flora of southern Africa 1:
3—34, 1966. Figure 4). One of the main tasks which
occupied him during his retirement was the complete
rewriting of Phillips’s Genera under the title of The Gen-
era of Southern African Flowering Plants (Figure 5) in
two volumes (1975, 1976, the latter volume, dealing
with Monocotyledons, in collaboration with A. A. Ober-
meyer). This was an undertaking which only a person
with his wide experience could undertake and on which
he left his personal stamp. Even after his final retire-
ment, he continued with his studies, dealing with the
genera Ceropegia, Brachystelma and Riocreuxia in
Flora of southern African 27,4 (1980) and in a more
popular, well illustrated account in 1983.
Dr Dyer was a staunch supporter of local scientific
societies and was the recipient of their major awards. His
work was also internationally recognized and respected.
He was elected Fellow of the Cactus and Succulent
FIGURE 3. — Three former directors
of the B.R.I.: centre, Dr E. P.
Phillips (1939-1944); left. Dr
R. A. Dyer ( 1944- 1963); right,
Dr L. E. Codd (1963- 1973) on
the occasion of Dr Dyer's retire-
ment in 1963.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
133
FIGURE 4. — Dr Dyer examining Encephalartos eugene-maraisii Verdoom in the Transvaal Waterberg, May 1947.
FIGURE 5. — In his office on completion of his Genera ( 1976). Photo:
Pretoria News.
Society of America in 1941 and Fellow of the Royal
Society of South Africa in 1944. After receiving the
Senior Capt. Scott Memorial Medal from the South Afri-
can Biological Society in 1942, he was President of the
Society in 1948 and President of the South African Asso-
ciation for the Advancement of Science in I960, having
received their medal in 1951. In 1948 he was awarded
the medal of the American Amaryllis Society and in
1954 the medal of the Botanical Society of France. The
Gold Medal of the South African Association of Botan-
ists was awarded to him in 1973 and, in 1976, Wit-
watersrand University conferred on him on honorary
D.Sc. degree in recognition of his contributions to South
African botany.
He collected over 6 000 specimens, many of which
are supported by excellent field photographs. About 200
of these are from the island of Tristan da Cunha, which
he visited in 1937. He is commemorated in the generic
name Radyera Bullock and in several species names in-
cluding Aridaria dyeri N.E. Br., Delosperma dyeri L.
Bol., Hereroa dyeri L. Bol., Eriospermum dyeri Archi-
bald and Agapanthus dyeri Leighton.
Dr Dyer was essentially a modest person but was pos-
sessed of great determination and perseverance. He lived
a full life with many interests and it was typical of him
that, whatever he undertook, he went into wholehear-
tedly and was prepared to devote his time and gifts of
leadership to the furtherance of his objectives. Unlike
many botanists, he was a keen grower of plants and, with
his usual enthusiasm, served on the committee of the
Pretoria Horticultural Society for over thirty years, ten of
which were as President. By his integrity and sincerity
he inspired the loyalty and esteem of his staff, and he
will be remembered with affection and respect by his
wide circle of friends and colleagues. He is survived by
his daughter Rosemary and his two sons Michael and
Tristan, and their families, to whom our sincere sympa-
thy is extended.
L. E. CODD
Bothalia 18,1: 135-136(1988)
Book Reviews
ICONOGRAPHIA PALYNOLOGICA PTER1DOPHYTORUM ITA-
LIAE by E. FERRARINI, F. CIAMPOLINI, R. E. G. PICHI SER-
MOLLI, and D. MARCHETTI. Webbia 40, part 1. 1986. Museo Bota-
nico dell' Universita, Via G. La Pira 4, 50121 Firenze, Italy. Pp. 202,
71 plates.
The first paragraph of the abstract of this publication states that: ‘The
main object of this work is the illustration, by the scanning electron
microscope, of the spores of the Pteridophyta native in Italy. These
amount to 124 specific and infraspecific taxa, whose spores are illus-
trated by 550 micrographs (3-8 for each taxon) assembled in 71
plates.’ This paragraph does not do justice to the final product and
gives little indication of the scope and excellence of the treatise.
The work has a monographic format with the accent falling on the
spores rather than on the whole plant, e.g. the keys to the genera and
the separate infrageneric keys refer only to the characters of the spores.
It consists of a preface, and introduction (including a checklist) and
four parts of the text proper.
The first part supplies the data pertinent to each taxon: names,
voucher, figure captions, description of the spores, mode of reproduc-
tion, ploidy level, chromosome numbers and genomic formula, as well
as distributional and other information.
The second part consists of a key to the taxa based on palynological
characteristics and the third part is an illustrated glossary of more than
142 terms. This is followed by a bibliography of about 350 references
on various subjects.
Unfortunately the information contained in the text is not readily
accessible to those who do not read Italian. However, there is much
besides for anyone with an interest in the subject. Until this sort of
work has been carried out on the pteridophyte floras of all countries of
the world, a satisfactory worldwide taxonomic treatment of certain
genera, e.g. Cheilanthes, is probably not possible.
NICOLA C. ANTHONY
DICTION ARY OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN PLACE NAMES by P. E.
RAPER. 1987. Lowry Publishers, P.O. Box 1180, Rivonia 2128,
Johannesburg. Pp. 368. Price R34,95 + G.S.T.
The main part of this book is a dictionary with some 2 000 southern
African place names. Cities, towns, townships, airports, villages,
regions, mountains, rivers, forests, promontories, bays and other cul-
tural and natural features have been included. The dictionary is com-
piled according to the recommendations of the United Nations Group
of Experts on Geographical names (UNGEGN) and the National Place
Names Committee. The author is currently head of the Onomastic
Research Centre of the Human Sciences Research Council and also the
South African representative in the UNGEGN.
In the introductory section, some of the fascinating problems of the
standardization of geographical names are briefly outlined. Principles
and guidelines that should be taken into account when new names are
proposed, are given. Spelling and form of names in Afrikaans, Dutch,
English, Khoekhoen and some African languages, as well as dual
forms are discussed with the aid of examples. Furthermore, various
aspects such as structure, meaning, reference and syntax of place
names are highlighted.
The entries in the dictionary are arranged alphabetically and appear
in bold type. Names approved by the National Place Names Committee
are preceded by an asterisk. Each entry is followed by an abbreviation
that indicates the administrative region or province, and by the grid
reference. Then an indication of the topographic category such as city,
township, tributary, cave, village, waterfall etc. and a description of
the locality in terms of distance and direction from other places are
given. In the case of cities and towns there is a brief account of the
establishment, official status and important historical events. The
language of origin (if not English) and the meaning of the name are
supplied. Often the origin of the place name is also explained.
Anyone who puts hand to paper to write or publish should be aware
of this source of standardized southern African place names and has no
excuse for using them haphazardly anymore. This extremely useful
reference book also makes entertaining reading matter and the reader
soon finds himself absorbed in the wealth of cultural and historical
information and interesting linguistic explanations.
The cover depicts a gravel road running through red sand dunes
north-east of Hotazel — an interesting name with a humorous undertone
in being a pun on ‘hot as hell’ which evidently refers to the weather
when the original farm was surveyed. A windmill and the silhouette of
a building very aptly suggest a place with a name. This scene is, of
course, in the north-western and not in the north-eastern Cape as stated
in the caption of the cover photograph.
Some names that have somewhat surprisingly been omitted, are
those of places such as All Days, Ann’s Villa, Hazenjacht, Numbi,
Sedgefield and Wilderness. On the other hand Joeys, the common
nickname for Johannesburg, and The Friendly City, a popular name for
Port Elizabeth, have been included.
Hopefully users of geographical names will employ this valuable
guide to bring their writings and publications in line with international
recommendations in this regard. The author’s effort towards standardi-
zation deserves the support of workers in spheres as varied as biologi-
cal science, transport and telecommunications, to name a few.
EMSIE DU PLESSIS
PLANTING A BIBLE GARDEN by F. NIGEL HEPPER. 1987. Her
Majesty's Stationery Office (HMSO Books), St Crispin’s, Duke St,
Norwich NR3 1PD, England. Pp. 104. ISBN 0 11 250011 0. Price:
paperback £6.95.
Whether for education, recreation, or conservation purposes, this
book will provide an excellent practical reference for anyone interested
in planting a garden with a biblical theme. The author’s selection of
Bible plants is based on 190 Scripture references spanning both Old
and New Testaments. Considerable linguistic and biological acumen is
required to translate the plant terminology of original writers into that
of the modem botanist. In my opinion, the author has handled this
difficult subject admirably. His selection of Bible plants includes more
than 220 species covering more than 90 genera. In habit, the plants
range from herbs to trees and their habitats from marshes to tropical
deserts. Selected plants can therefore be cultivated in most parts of the
world.
The plants are conveniently divided into six sections, viz. annuals;
perennials; shrubs and small trees; large trees; water plants and tender
plants. Each plant is documented by a clear line drawing by the author,
a brief description, the biblical context, notes on cultivation, and a list
of alternative species. In addition, more than 40 species are beautifully
illustrated by means of colour photographs by the author. Helpful hints
on planning a Bible garden and labelling its contents are also given.
Addresses of Bible gardens around the world provide further useful
information. A concluding section lists many of the Bible plants
according to their use, viz. herbs and spices; fruits and nuts; vege-
tables; fibres and textiles; dried and cut flowers; and pot pourri.
The book would suit both the layman and the professional. It is
attractive, easy to use and instructive. The author and publisher are to
be congratulated on a fine product.
G. DEALL
THE BOTANY OF THE SOUTHERN NATAL DRAKENSBERG by
O. M. HILLIARD & B. L. BURTT. 1987. Annals of the Kirstenbosch
Botanic Gardens, vol. 15. National Botanic Gardens, Private Bag X7,
Claremont 7735. Pp. 253, 37 colour photographs, 6 maps. Price:
R31,50.
It is a pleasure to review this long-awaited work on the botany of the
southern Natal Drakensberg, the result of intensive research in that
region by the authors since the early 1960’s. The work consists chiefly
of an annotated checklist with 10 ancillary chapters covering a wide
variety of topics. In the first two chapters the authors describe the area
studied, including the topography and climate. The study area stretches
from the south face of Giant’s Castle in the north to the old provincial
boundary between Natal and East Griqualand along the Endawana
River in the south, i.e. the Bushman’s Nek area, as well as the Lesotho
136
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
National Park at Sehlabathebe. For good measure, the south face of
Kamberg (2 095 m) lying some 10 km north-east of the Giant’s Castle
spur is included. Altitudinally, the area stretches from 1 800 m, i.e.
roughly the base of the Clarens Formation (Cave Sandstone), to the
adjacent summit plateau rising to over 3 400 m.
Chapter 3 is devoted to a history of land-use and botanical explora-
tion. The occupation of the Drakensberg by Middle Stone Age hunter
gatherers, the Bushman (San), Bantu-speaking peoples and finally the
whites is described in fair detail. The pages dealing with botanical
exploration refer to the collections of Maurice Evans (1895 & 1896),
A. P. D. McClean (1938). A. C. Beverly & F. K. Hoener at Sehlaba-
thebe ( 1975— 1979), F. B. Wright ( 1960’s & 1970's) and then Hilliard
& Burtt from the early 1960’s. Surprisingly, the seven collecting expe-
ditions carried out by the Botanical Research Institute from 1966 on-
wards are completely ignored. During these expeditions well over
1 000 numbers were collected and yielded a number of new taxa in-
cluding the new moss genus Quathlamba and many new records. A
useful guide to the collecting localities of Hilliard & Burtt is included
on pages 19-22 together with a map indicating their collecting bases.
The distribution of these bases reflects the thoroughness of their col-
lecting programme.
Chapter 4, a very brief chapter, is devoted to fire and Chapter 5 to
’topics and plants of special interest'. The latter includes discussions of
pollination, hybrids, growth form, aquatics, assimilating stems and
aliens. Under pollination, interesting examples are given of floral
guilds involving species of Silene and Zaluzianskya, and species of
Diascia. Vegetation patterns are described in Chapter 6.
In Chapter 7 the floras of the northern and southern Berg are dis-
cussed and lists of endemics for the two regions are provided. The
authors make the startling statement that the northern Drakensberg is
still ‘ill-explored’ and that ‘many of the distributions’ (presumably of
the southern species listed) ‘are based solely on our own collections
and those of F. B. Wright, because there are no others’. Firstly, ‘ill-
explored’ is perhaps an exaggeration. Thode, the pioneer plant collec-
tor in the Drakensberg, collected intensively in the northern Drakens-
berg from 1890 onwards. There are 6 309 Thode specimens in Stellen-
bosch Herbarium described by E. P. Phillips as ‘the cream of Thode’s
collections — his high mountain gatherings’. In addition, Thode sent
thousands of specimens to the Berlin Herbarium and there are also
specimens in Pretoria, Durban and Kew. Other collectors include Fla-
nagan, Evans, Bolus, Wood, Marriott, Bayer & McClean, Potts, Hut-
chinson, Forbes & Verdoom, Galpin, Doidge, Hafstrom, Meebold,
Germain, Dyke, Esterhuysen, Schelpe, West, Trauseld, Killick,
Edwards & Granger. The fact that PRECIS, the Pretoria National Her-
barium databank, which does not include data from the Natal Herba-
rium, Natal University Herbarium or the Donald Killick Herbarium,
records 1 861 species and 7 029 specimens from the northern Drakens-
berg rather refutes Hilliard & Bum’s assertion. Regarding the PRECIS
figure for species, it is appreciated that it is based on unchecked speci-
mens and an incompletely known taxonomy and that the quarter degree
grid squares used cover too wide an area in some cases, especially
eastwards. Secondly, in view of the collections made by the Botanical
Research Institute referred to in paragraph two above, it is scarcely
correct to say that there are no other collections from the southern
Drakensberg apart from theirs and those of F. B. Wright. The list of
southern Drakensberg endemics is unfortunately vitiated by the inclu-
sion of species such as Senecio quathlambanus and Colula radicalis
which occur at the top of the Langalibalele Pass — north of the Giant's
Castle spur and hence in the northern Drakensberg. Strictly speaking,
the species cited for Giant’s Castle Pass also fall away for the same
reason, the Pass being north of the south face, but this is probably
splitting hairs.
Composition of the flora of the southern Drakensberg is discussed in
Chapter 8; statistics on the largest families and genera are given and
comparisons made with the Cape and Natal floras.
Phytogeography is the theme of Chapters 9 & 10. As the reviewer
has dabbled in the phytogeography of the Drakensberg, albeit in a
perfunctory and brief way, these chapters are of special interest to him.
particularly as he has been quoted so liberally by Hilliard & Burtt. It is
apparent that Hilliard & Bum have based their findings on the phyto-
geography of the Eastern Mountain Region [a name first coined by
Phillips (1917)] on their southern Drakensberg collectings which
number 1 375 flowering plant species. They state that this flora repre-
sents ‘an adequate sample, a fair sample and a representative sample’.
Whether this is so, is difficult to establish. Unfortunately at this stage it
is not possible to calculate the total number of species in the Eastern
Mountain Region. To illustrate how figures change with time, Jacot
Guillarmod ( 1970) in her Flora of Lesotho listed 1 052 flowering plant
species. Today the latest PRECIS figure for Lesotho is 1 800, an in-
crease of 71% in 17 years. There is no telling what the figure could be
in a few years time as a result of present ecological and pasture studies
in connection with the Lesotho Highlands Water Project. The point
being made is that if Hilliard & Bum’s sample is too small and not
representative, their phytogeographical conclusions could lose some of
their validity.
Hilliard & Bum discuss in detail the various views held about the
place of the Drakensberg in African phytogeography. As the result of
critical analyses of the floras involved, they reach certain conclusions:
1. The concept of an Afroalpine Region (Killick 1978) is re-
jected— presumably also the earlier formulated Austro-afroal-
pine Region of Van Zinderen Bakker & Werger ( 1974) and the
Austral Domain of the Afroalpine Region (Werger, quoted by
Killick 1978), neither reference curiously being quoted by Hil-
liard & Bum — on the grounds that true floristic links with the
Afroalpine Region of East Africa are meagre;
2. Similarly, the authors state that the Drakensberg lacks strong
links with that of the tropical Afromontane regions;
3. They provide evidence to show that the Cape element in the
Drakensberg flora has been underestimated;
4. Finally, though favouring Phillips’s concept of the Eastern
Mountain Region, they state that this region does not qualify as
a regional centre of endemism, because its total flora and the
number of endemics are too small. Therefore, they propose the
name South-eastern Mountain Regional Mosaic.
Chapter 1 1 , the annotated checklist, forms the bulk of the book, 138
pages, and will undoubtedly be a most useful tool to scientists of many
disciplines, especially in view of its taxonomic accuracy. As such, it
warrants little comment. What a pity the BRI collections of bryophytes
were not included: the list included is far from representative and for
some unknown reason, unlike the vascular plants, the moss taxa are not
arranged in families. A small point: included in the list of mosses are
Radula boryana and Symphyogyna (not Symphogyna) sp. — both liver-
worts. In the list of grasses there is one surprising omission and that is
Polevansia rigida, so common on Sani Top [see Figure 1 on p.278 of
Bothalia 17, 2 ( 1987)]. A comparison of the Hilliard & Burtt checklist
with the 1987 PRECIS printout (due in December 1987) for the south-
ern Drakensberg should reveal many more omissions. An unexpected
postscript to the checklist, especially in a book of this nature, is the
publication of the name of a new species, Passerina drakensbergensis
Hilliard & Burtt, misidentified by all previous workers as P.fdiformis
L.
Chapter 12, concluding the book, is a revised list of the plants
collected by E. E. Galpin on Ben McDhui and nearby in 1904.
The book is published by the National Botanic Gardens of South
Africa, hence the modest price of R31,50. The book is well presented,
but many of the 37 colour photographs are excessively dark and green.
The authors are to be congratulated on the production of a most useful
addition to the literature of the Natal Drakensberg — a work based on
many years of painstaking and diligent research. A disappointment to
the reviewer is that the authors saw fit to ignore the collectings of the
BRI in the southern Drakensberg and in so doing reduced the complete-
ness of their work. However, I recommend the book to all students and
lovers of the Berg — 'that veiled enchanted country' in the ‘mythical
realm of clouds’ (Thode).
D. J. B. KILLICK
Bothalia 18,1: 137-142(1988)
Guide for authors to Bothalia
This guide is updated when necessary. The latest ver-
sion should therefore be consulted.
Bothalia is named in honour of General Louis Botha,
first Premier and Minister of Agriculture of the Union of
South Africa. This house journal of the Botanical Re-
search Institute is devoted to the furtherance of botanical
science. The main fields covered are taxonomy, eco-
logy, anatomy and cytology. Two parts of the journal
and an index to contents, authors and subjects are pub-
lished annually.
EDITORIAL POLICY
Bothalia welcomes original papers dealing with flora
and vegetation of southern Africa and related subjects.
Full-length papers and short notes, as well as book
reviews, are accepted. Manuscripts may be written in
either English or Afrikaans.
Articles are assessed by referees, both local and over-
seas. Authors are welcome to suggest possible referees
to judge their work. Authors are responsible for the fac-
tual correctness of their contributions. Bothalia main-
tains an editorial board (see title page) to ensure that
international standards are upheld.
PRESENTATION OF MANUSCRIPT
Manuscripts should be typewritten on one side of good
quality A4-size paper, double-spaced throughout (in-
cluding abstract, tables, captions to figures, literature
references etc.) and have a margin of at least 30 mm all
round. The original and three photocopies (preferably
photocopied on both sides of the paper to reduce weight
for postage) of all items, including text, illustrations,
tables and lists should be submitted, and the author
should retain a complete set of copies. Papers should
conform to the general style and layout of recent issues
of Bothalia (from Volume 14 onwards). Material should
be presented in the following sequence: Title page with
title, name(s) of author(s), keywords, abstracts (in
English and Afrikaans) and information that should be
placed in a footnote on the title page, such as address(es)
of author(s) and mention of granting agencies. The
sequence continues with Introduction and aims. Material
and methods, Results, Interpretation (Discussion), Ac-
knowledgements, Specimens examined (in revisions and
monographs). References, Index of names (recom-
mended for revisions dealing with more than about 15
species). Tables, Captions for figures and figures. In the
case of short notes and book reviews, keywords and
abstract are superfluous. All pages must be numbered
consecutively beginning with the title page to those with
references, tables and captions to figures.
AUTHOR(S)
When there are several authors the covering letter
should indicate clearly which of them is responsible for
correspondence and, if possible, telephonically available
while the article is being processed. The contact address
and telephone number should be mentioned if they differ
from those given on the letterhead.
TITLE
The title should be as concise and as informative as
possible. In articles dealing with taxonomy or closely
related subjects the family of the taxon under discussion
(see also Names of taxa under General below) should be
mentioned in brackets but author citations should be
omitted from plant names.
KEYWORDS
Up to 10 keywords (or index terms) should be pro-
vided in English in alphabetical sequence. The following
points should be borne in mind when selecting key-
words:
1, Keywords should be unambiguous, internationally
acceptable words and not recently-coined little-known
words; 2, they should be in a noun form and verbs should
be avoided; 3, they should not consist of an adjective
alone; adjectives should be combined with nouns; 4, they
should not contain prepositions; 5, the singular form
should be used for processes and properties, e.g. evapo-
ration; 6, the plural form should be used for physical
objects, e.g. augers; 7, location (province and/or coun-
try); taxa (species, genus, family) and vegetation type
(community, veld type, biome) should be used as key-
words; 8, keywords should be selected hierarchically
where possible, e.g. both family and species should be
included; 9, they should include terms used in the title;
10, they should answer the following questions: 10.1,
what is the active concept in the document (activity,
operation or process); 10.2, what is the passive concept
or object of the active process (item on which the activ-
ity, operation or process takes place); 10.3, what is the
means of accomplishment or how is the active concept
achieved (technique, method, apparatus, operation or
process); 10.4, what is the environment in which the
active concept takes place (medium, location) and 10.5,
what are the independent (controlled) and dependent
variables? 11, questions 10.1 to 10.3 should preferably
also be answered in the title.
ABSTRACT
Abstracts of no more than 200 words should be pro-
vided in English and Afrikaans. Abstracts are of great
importance and should convey the essence of the article.
They should refer to the geographical area concerned
and, in taxonomic articles, mention the number of taxa
treated. They should not contain information not appear-
ing in the article. In articles dealing with taxonomy or
closely related subjects all taxa from the rank of genus
downwards should be accompanied by their author cita-
tions. Names of new taxa and new combinations should
not be underlined. If the article deals with too many taxa
only the important ones should be mentioned.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A table of contents should be given for all articles
longer than about six typed pages, unless they follow the
strict format of a taxonomic revision.
138
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Acknowledgements should be kept to the minimum
compatible with the requirements of courtesy. Please
give all the initials of the person(s) you are thanking.
LITERATURE REFERENCES
In text
Literature references in the text should be cited as
follows: ‘Jones & Smith (1986) stated ...’ or ‘... (Jones
& Smith 1986)’ when giving a reference simply as
authority for a statement. When more than two authors
are involved use the name of the first author followed by
et al. When referring to more than one literature refer-
ence, they should be arranged alphabetically according
to author and separated by a semicolon, e.g. (Anon.
1981, 1984; Davis 1976; Nixon 1940). Titles of books
and names of journals should preferably not be men-
tioned in the text. If there is good reason for doing so,
they should be treated as described in the paragraph In
reference list below. Personal communications are given
only in the text, not in the list of references. Please add
the person’s full initials to identify the person more posi-
tively.
In taxonomic articles
The correct name (not underlined) is to be followed by
its author citation (underlined) and the full literature re-
ference, with the name of the publication written out in
full. Thereafter all literature references, including those
of the synonyms, should only reflect author, page and
year of publication, e.g. C. E. Hubb. in Kew Bulletin
15: 307 (1960); Boris et al .: 14 (1966); Boris: 89 (1967);
Sims: t. 38 (1977); Sims: 67 (1980). Note that (1) refer-
ences are arranged in chronological sequence; (2) where
two or more references by the same author are listed in
succession, the author’s name is repeated with every
reference; (3) names of authors are written in the same
way (see Names of authors of plant names under Gen-
eral), irrespective of whether the person in question is
cited as the author of a plant name or of a publication; (4)
the word ‘figure’ is written as ‘fig.’, and ‘t.’ is used for
both ‘plate’ and ‘tablet’.
Literature references providing good illustrations of
the species in question may be cited in a paragraph com-
mencing with the word leones followed by a colon. This
paragraph is given after the last paragraph of the syno-
nymy.
In reference list
All publications referred to in the text, including those
mentioned in full in the treatment of correct names in
taxonomic papers, but no others, and no personal com-
munications, are listed at the end of the manuscript under
the heading References. The references are arranged
alphabetically according to authors and chronologically
under each author, with a, b, c, etc. added to the year, if
the author has published more than one work in a year. If
an author has published both on his own and as a senior
author with others, the solo publications are listed first
and after that, in strict alphabetical sequence, those pub-
lished with one or more other authors. Author names are
typed in capitals. Titles of journals and of books are
written out in full and are underlined as follows: Trans-
actions of the Linnean Society of London 5: 171 —217, or
Biology and ecology of weeds: 24. Titles of books should
be given as in Taxonomic literature, edn 2 by Stafleu &
Cowan and names of journals as in World list of scien-
tific periodicals, edn 4. If the same author is mentioned
more than once the name is written out in full and not
replaced by a line.
Examples of references:
Collective book or Flora
BROWN, N. E. 1909. Asclepiadaceae. In W. T. Thiselton-Dyer,
Flora capensis 6,2: 518- 1036. Reeve, London.
BROWN, N. E. 1915. Asclepiadaceae. In W. T. Thiselton-Dyer,
Flora of tropical Africa 5,2: 500-600. Reeve, London.
Book
DU TOIT, A. L. 1966. Geology of South Africa, 3rd edn, S. M.
Haughton (ed.). Oliver & Boyd, London.
HUTCHINSON, J. 1946. A botanist in southern Africa. Gawthom,
London.
Journal
MORRIS, J. W. 1969. An ordination of the vegetation of Ntshon-
gweni. Natal. Bothalia 10: 89- 120.
STEBBINS, G. L. Jr 1952. Aridity as a stimulus to plant evolution.
American Naturalist 86: 35-44.
SMOOK, L. & GIBBS RUSSELL, G. E. 1985. Poaceae. Memoirs of
the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 5 1 : 45 - 70.
In press, in preparation
TAYLOR, H. C. in press. A reconnaissance of the vegetation ofRooi-
berg State Forest. Department of Forestry, Technical Bulletin.
VOGEL, J. C. 1982. The age of the Kuiseb River silt terrace at
Homeb. Palaeoecology of Africa 15. In press.
WEISSER, P. J., GARLAND, J. F. & DREWS, B. K. in prep. Dune
advancement 1937-1977 and preliminary vegetation succession
chronology at Mlaltfei Nature Reserve, Natal, South Africa.
Bothalia.
Thesis
KRUGER, F. J. 1974. The physiography and plant communities of the
Jakkalsrivier Catchment. M. Sc. (Forestry) thesis, University of
Stellenbosch.
Miscellaneous paper, report, unpublished article, tech-
nical note, congress proceedings
ANON, no date. Eetbare plante van die Wolkberg. Botanical Research
Unit, Grahamstown. Unpublished.
BAWDEN, M. G. & CARROL, D. M. 1968. The land resources of
Lesotho. Land Resources Study No. 3, Land Resources Division,
Directorate of Overseas Surveys, Tolworth.
BOUCHER, C. 1981. Contributions of the Botanical Research Insti-
tute. In A. E. F. Heydom, Proceedings of workshop research in
Cape estuaries: 105-107. National Research Institute for Oceano-
logy, CSIR, Stellenbosch.
NATIONAL BUILDING RESEARCH INSTITUTE 1959. Report of
the committee on the protection of building timbers in South
Africa against termites, woodboring beetles and fungi, 2nd edn,
CSIR Research Report No. 169.
TABLES
Each table should be presented on a separate sheet and
be assigned an Arabic numeral, i.e. the first table men-
tioned in the text is marked ‘Table 1’. In the captions of
tables the word ‘table’ is written in capital letters. See
recent numbers of Bothalia for the format required.
Avoid vertical lines, if at all possible. Tables can often
be reduced in width by interchanging primary horizontal
and vertical heads.
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
139
FIGURES
General
Figures should be planned to fit, after reduction, into a
width of either 80, 118 or 165 mm, with a maximum
vertical length of 240 mm. Allow space for the caption in
the case of figures that will occupy a whole page. It is
recommended that drawings should be twice the size of
the final reproduction but photographs should be the
same size as required in the journal. Lettering and num-
bering on all figures should be done in letraset, stencil-
ling or a comparable method. If symbols are to be placed
on a dark background it is recommended that black sym-
bols are used on a small white disk or square. If the
lettering or wording on a figure is to be done by the
printer this information must be typed or neatly printed
on a photocopy of the figure or on an overlay attached to
the original. If several illustrations are treated as compo-
nents of a single composite figure they should be desig-
nated by capital letters. Note that the word ‘figure’
should be written out in full, both in the text and the
captions. In the text the figure reference is then written
as in the following example: ‘The stamens (Figure 4A,
B, C) are In captions, ‘figure’ is written in capital
letters. Magnification of figures should be given for the
size as submitted. It is recommended, however, that
scale bars or lines be used on figures. In figures accom-
panying taxonomic papers, voucher specimens should be
given in the relevant caption. Figures are numbered con-
secutively with Arabic numerals in the order they are
referred to in the text. These numbers, as well as the
author’s name and an indication of the top of the figure,
must be written in soft pencil on the back of all figures.
Authors should indicate in pencil in the text where they
would like the figures to appear. Authors wishing to
have the originals of figures returned must inform the
editor in the original covering letter and must mark each
original ‘To be returned to author’. Authors wishing to
use illustrations already published must obtain written
permission before submitting the manuscript and inform
the editor of this fact. Captions for figures should be
collected together and typed on a separate sheet headed
Captions for figures.
Black and white drawings
Line drawings, including graphs and diagrams, should
be in jet-black Indian ink, preferably on bristol board or
tracing film. Lines should be bold enough to stand reduc-
tion.
Photographs
Photographs should be of excellent quality on glossy
paper with clear detail and moderate contrast. Photo-
graph mosaics should be submitted complete, the com-
ponent photographs mounted neatly on a white card base
leaving a narrow gap of uniform width between each
print. Note that grouping photographs of markedly diver-
gent contrast results in poor reproductions.
Dot maps
It is strongly recommended that taxonomic articles
include dot maps as figures to show the distribution of
taxa. The dots used must be large enough to stand reduc-
tion to 80 mm (recommended size: letraset 5 mm diame-
ter). Blank maps are available from the editor.
GENERAL
Names of taxa
As a rule authors should use the names as listed by
Gibbs Russell et al. in Memoirs of the Botanical Survey
of South Africa Nos 48, 51 and 56. Names of genera and
infrageneric taxa are usually underlined with the author
citation (where relevant) not underlined. Exceptions in-
clude names of new taxa in the abstracts, correct names
given in the synopsis or in paragraphs on species ex-
cluded from a given supraspecific group in taxonomic
articles in checklists and in indices, where the position is
reversed, correct names being not underlined and syno-
nyms underlined. Names above generic level are not
underlined. In articles dealing with taxonomy and clo-
sely related subjects the complete scientific name of a
plant (with author citation) should be given at the first
mention in the text. The generic name should be abbre-
viated to the initial thereafter, except where intervening
references to other genera with the same initial could
cause confusion.
Names of authors of plant names
These should agree with the list compiled by the BRI
(TN TAX 2/1) which has also been implemented by
Gibbs Russell et al. in Memoirs of the Botanical Survey
of South Africa Nos 48, 51 and 56. Modem authors not
included in the list should use their full name and initials
when publishing new plant names. Other author names
not in the list should be in agreement with the recom-
mendations of the Code.
Names of authors of publications
These are written out in full except in the synonymy in
taxonomic articles where they are treated like names of
authors of plant names.
Names of plant collectors
These are underlined whenever they are linked to the
number of a specimen. The collection number is also
underlined, e.g. Acocks 14407. Surnames beginning
with ‘De’, ‘Du’ or ‘Van’ begin with a capital letter un-
less preceded by an initial.
Measurements
Use only units of the International System of Units
(SI). Cm should not be used, only mm and/or m. The use
of ‘±’ instead of c. orca is recommended.
Numerals
Numbers ‘one’ to ‘nine’ are spelled out in normal text
and from 10 onwards they are written in Arabic nume-
rals. In descriptions of plants, numerals are used
throughout. Write 2, 0-4, 5 (not 2-4,5). When counting
members write 2 or 3 (not 2-3).
Abbreviations
Abbreviations should be used sparingly but consis-
tently. No full stops are placed after abbreviations end-
ing with the last letter of the full word (e.g. edition =
edn; editor = ed.), after units of measure, after compass
directions and after herbarium designations.
140
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
KEYS TOTAXA
la Leaves closely arranged on an elongated stem; a submerged aquatic with only the capitula
exserted lb. E. setaceum var. pumilum
lb Leaves in basal rosettes; stems suppressed; small marsh plants, ruderals or rarely aquatics:
2a Annuals, small, fast growing pioneers, dying when the habitat dries up; capitula without
coarse white setae; receptacles cylindrical:
3a Anthers white 2. E. cinereum
3b Anthers black 3. E. nigrum
2b Perennials, more robust plants; capitula sparsely to densely covered with short setae:
Herbarium voucher specimens
Wherever possible authors should refer to one or more
voucher specimen(s) in a registered herbarium.
It is recommended that (apart from multi-access keys)
indented keys be used with couplets numbered la— lb,
2a— 2b, etc. (without full stops thereafter). Keys consist-
ing of a single couplet have no numbering. Manuscripts
of keys should be presented as in the example above.
SPECIES TREATMENT IN TAXONOMIC PAPERS
General presentation
The procedure to be followed is illustrated in the
example (under Description and example of species
treatment, below), which should be referred to, because
not all steps are described in full detail. The correct name
(see also Names of taxa, under General), with its litera-
ture citations is followed by the synonymy (if any), the
description and the discussion, which should consist of
paragraphs commencing, where possible, with italicised
leader words such as flowering time, diagnostic charac-
ters, distribution and habitat.
Numbering
When more than one species of a given genus is dealt
with in a paper, the correct name of each species should
be prefixed by a sequential number followed by a full
stop, the first line of the paragraph to be indented. Infra-
specific taxa are marked with small letters, e.g. lb.,
12c., etc.
Literature references within synonymy
(See above under Literature references, paragraph 2.)
Citation of specimens
Type specimen in synopsis
The following should be given (if available): country
(if not in RSA), province, locality as given by original
collector, modem equivalent of collecting locality in
square brackets (if relevant), date of collection (optio-
nal), collector’s name and collecting number (both
underlined). The abbreviation s.n. ( sine numero) is
given after the name of a collector who usually assigned
numbers to his collections but did not do so in the speci-
men in question. The herbaria in which the relevant
type(s) are housed are indicated by means of the abbre-
viations given in the latest edition of Index Herbariorum.
The holotype (holo.) and its location are mentioned first,
followed by a semicolon, the other herbaria are arranged
alphabetically, separated by commas. Authors should
indicate by means of an exclamation mark (!) which of
the types have been personally examined. If only a photo-
graph or microfiche was seen, write as follows: Anon.
422 (X, holo.— BOL, photo.!). Lectotypes or neotypes
should be chosen for correct names without a holotype.
It is not necessary to lectotypify synonyms. When a
lecto- or a neotype are newly chosen this should be indi-
cated by using the phrase ‘here designated’. If reference
is made to a previously selected lectotype or neotype, the
name of the designating author and the literature refe-
rence should be given. In cases where no type was cited,
and none has subsequently been nominated, this may be
stated as ‘not designated’.
In notes and brief taxonomic articles
In brief papers mentioning only a few species and a
few cited specimens the specimens should be arranged
according to the grid reference system:
Provinces/countries (typed in capitals) should be cited
in the following order: SWA/Namibia, Botswana,
Transvaal, Orange Free State, Swaziland, Natal,
Lesotho, Transkei and Cape. Grid references should be
cited in numerical sequence. Locality records for speci-
mens should preferably be given to within a quarter-
degree square. Records from the same one-degree square
are given in alphabetical order, i.e. (-AC) precedes
(-AD), etc. Records from the same quarter-degree
square are arranged alphabetically according to the col-
lector’s names; the quarter degree references must be
repeated for each specimen cited. The relevant interna-
tional code of the herbaria in which a collection was seen
should be given in brackets after the collection number;
the codes are separated by commas. The following
example will explain the procedure:
NATAL. — 2731 (Louwsburg): 16 km E of Nongoma (-DD), Pelser
354 (BM, K, PRE); near Dwarsrand, Van der Merwe 4789 (BOL, M).
2829 (Harrismith): near Groothoek ( — AB), Smith 234\ Koffiefontein
(-AB), Taylor 720 (PRE); Cathedral Peak Forest Station (-CC),
Marriot 74 (KMG); Wilgerfontein, Roux 426. Grid ref. unknown;
Sterkstroom, Strydom 12 (NBG).
For records from outside southern Africa authors
should use degree squares without names, e.g.:
KENYA. — 0136: Nairobi plains beyond race course, Napier 485.
If long lists of specimens are given, they should be
dealt with as below.
In monographs and revisions
In the case of all major works of this nature it is as-
sumed that the author has investigated the relevant mate-
rial in all major herbaria and that he has provided the
specimens seen with determinavit labels. It is assumed
further that the author has submitted distribution maps
for all relevant taxa and that the distribution has been
described briefly in words in the text. Under the heading
‘Vouchers’ no more than 5 specimens should be cited.
Bothalia 18,1 ( 1988)
141
indicating merely the collector and the collector’s
number (both underlined). Specimens are alphabetically
arranged according to collector’s name. If more than one
specimen by the same collector is cited, they are ar-
ranged numerically and separated by a semicolon. The
purpose of the cited specimens is not to indicate distribu-
tion but to convey the author’s concept of the taxon in
question.
The herbaria in which the specimens are housed are
indicated by means of the abbreviation given in the latest
edition of Index Herbariorum. They are given between
brackets, arranged alphabetically and separated by com-
mas behind every specimen as in the following example:
Vouchers: Fisher 840 (NH, NU, PRE); Flanagan 831 (GRA, PRE);
840 (NH, PRE); Marloth 4926 (PRE, STE); Schelpe 6161, 6163, 6405
(BOL), Schlechter 4451 (BM, BOL, GRA, K, PRE).
All specimens studied by the author should be listed
together at the end of the article under the heading Speci-
mens examined. They are arranged alphabetically by the
collector’s name and then numerically for each collector.
The species is indicated in brackets by the number that
was assigned to it in the text and any infraspecific taxa
by a small letter. If more than one genus is dealt with in a
given article, the first species of the first genus men-
tioned is indicated as 1.1. This is followed by the inter-
national herbarium designation. Note that the name of
the collector and the collection number are underlined:
Acocks 12497 (2.1b) BM, K, PRE; 14724 (1.13a) BOL, K, P. Archer
1507 (1.4) BM, G.
Burchell 2847 (2.8c) BM, K. Burman 2401 (3.3) MO, S. Burtt 789
(2.6) B, KMG, STE.
In monographs and revisions
In the case of all major works of this nature it is as-
sumed that the author has investigated the relevant mate-
rial in all major herbaria and that he has provided the
specimens seen with determinavit labels. It is assumed
further that the author has submitted distribution maps
for all relevant taxa and that the distribution has been
described briefly in words in the text. Under the heading
‘Vouchers’ no more than 5 specimens should be cited,
indicating merely the collector and the collector’s
number (both underlined). Specimens are alphabetically
arranged according to collector’s name. If more than one
specimen by the same collector is cited, they are ar-
ranged numerically and separated by a semicolon. The
purpose of the cited specimens is not to indicate distribu-
tion but to convey the author’s concept of the taxon in
question.
The herbaria in which the specimens are housed are
indicated by means of the abbreviation given in the latest
edition of Index Herbariorum. They are given between
brackets, arranged alphabetically and separated by com-
mas behind every specimen as in the following example:
Vouchers: Fisher 840 (NH. NU, PRE); Flanagan 831 (GRA, PRE);
840 (NH, PRE); Madoih 4926 (PRE, STE); Schelpe 6161, 6163, 6405
( BOL ) ; Scltlec liter 445 1 (BM, BOL, GRA, K. PRE).
All specimens studied by the author should be listed
together at the end of the article under the heading Speci-
mens examined. They are arranged alphabetically by the
collector’s name and then numerically for each collector.
The species is indicated in brackets by the number that
was assigned to it in the text and any infraspecific taxa
by a small letter. If more than one genus is dealt with in a
given article, the first species of the first genus men-
tioned is indicated as 1.1. This is followed by the inter-
national herbarium designation. Note that the name of
the collector and the collection number are underlined:
Acocks 12497 (2. lb) BM, K, PRE; 14724 (1.13a) BOL, K, P Archer
1507 ( 1.4) BM,G.
Burchell 2847 (2.8c) BM, K. Burman 2401 (3.3) MO, S. Burtt 789
(2.6) B, KMG, STE.
Synonyms
In a monograph or a revision covering all of southern
Africa, all synonyms based on types of southern African
origin, or used in southern African literature, should be
included. Illegitimate names are designated by nom.
illeg. after the reference, followed by non with the
author and date, if there is an earlier homonym. Nomina
nuda (nom. nud.) and invalid names are excluded unless
there is a special reason to cite them, for example if they
have been used in prominent publications. Note that in
normal text Latin words are italicized, but in the synop-
sis of a species Latin words such as nom. nud. are not
italicized.
Synonyms should be arranged chronologically into
groups of nomenclatural synonyms, i.e. synonyms based
on the same type, and the groups should be arranged
chronologically by basionyms, except for the basionym
of the correct name which is dealt with in the paragraph
directly after that of the correct name. When a generic
name is repeated in a given synonymy it should be abbre-
viated to the inital except where intervening references to
other genera with the same initial could cause confusion.
Description and example of species treatment
Descriptions of all taxa of higher plants should, where
possible, follow the sequence: Habit; sexuality; under-
ground parts (if relevant). Indumentum (if it can be easily
described for the whole plant). Stems/branches. Bark.
Leaves', arrangement, petiole absent/present, pubes-
cence; blade: shape, size, apex, base, margin; midrib:
above/below, texture, colour; petiole; stipules. Inflores-
cence: type, shape, position; bracts/bracteoles. Flowers:
shape, sex. Receptacle. Calyx. Corolla. Disc. Androe-
cium. Gynoecium. Fruit. Seeds. Chromosome number.
Figure (word written out in full) number. As a rule shape
should be given before measurements. In general, if an
organ has more than one of the parts being described, use
the plural, otherwise use the singular, for example,
petals of a flower but blade of a leaf. Language must be
as concise as possible, using participles instead of verbs.
Dimension ranges should be cited as in the example
below. Care must be exercised in the use of dashes and
hyphens: a hyphen is a short stroke joining two syllables
of a word, e.g. ovate-lanceolate or sea-green; an N-dash
(en) is a longer stroke commonly used instead of the
word ‘to’ between numerals, ‘2-5 mm long’ (do not use
it between words but rather use the word ‘to’, e.g. ‘ovate
to lanceolate’), it is produced on a typewriter by typing 2
hyphens next to each other; and an M-dash (em) is a
stroke longer than an N-dash and is used variously, e.g.
in front of a subspecific epithet instead of the full species
name, it is produced on a typewriter by typing 3 hyphens
next to one another. The use of ‘±’ instead of c. orca is
recommended when describing shape, measurements,
dimensions etc.
142
Bothalia 18,1 (1988)
Example:
1. Bequaertiodendron magalismontanum (Sond.) Heine &
Hemsl. in Kew Bulletin: 307 (1960); Codd: 72 (1964); Elsdon: 75
(1980). Type: Transvaal, Magaliesberg, Zeyher 1849 (S. holo.-BOL,
photo.!)
Chrysophyllum magalismontanum Sond.: 721 (1850); Harv.: 812
(1867); Engl.: 434 (1904); Bottmar: 34 (1919). Zeyherella magalis-
montanum (Sond.) Aubrev. & Pelegr.: 105 (1958); Justin: (1973).
Chrysophyllum argyrophyllum Hiem: 721 (1850); Engl.: 43 (1904).
Boivinella argyrophylla (Hiem) Aubrev. & Pellegr. : 37 (1958); Justin:
98 (1973). Types: Angola, Welwitsch 4828 (BM!, lecto., here desig-
nated; PRE!); Angola, Welwitsch 4872 (BM!).
Chrysophyllum wilmsii Engl.: 4, t. 16 (1904); Masonet: 77 (1923);
Woodson: 244 (1937). Boivinella wilmsii (Engl.) Aubrev. & Pellegr.:
39 ( 1958); Justin: 99 ( 1973). Type: Transvaal, Magoebaskloof, Wilms
1812 (B, holo.; K!, P!, lecto, designated by Aubrev. & Pellegr.: 38
(1958), PRE!, S!W!,Z!).
Bequaertiodendron fruticosa De Wild.: 37 (1923), non Bonpland:
590 (1823); Bakker: 167 (1929); Fries: 302 (1938); Davy: 640 (1954);
Breytenbach: 117 (1959); Clausen: 720 (1968); Palmer: 34 (1969).
Type: Transvaal, Tzaneen Distr., Granville 3665 (K, holo.!; G!, P!,
PRE!, S!).
Bequaertiodendron fragrans auct. nonOldemann: Glover: 149, t. 19
(1915); Henkel: 226 ( 1934); Stapelton: 6 ( 1954).
leones: Harv.: 812 (1867); Henkel: t. 84 (1934); Codd: 73 (1964);
Palmer: 35 (1969).
Woody perennial; main branches up to 0,4 m long,
erect or decumbent, grey woolly-felted, leafy. Leaves
3—10 (—23) x 1 ,0- 1 ,5(-4,0) mm, linear to oblanceo-
late, obtuse, base broad, half-clasping. Heads heteroga-
mous, campanulate, 7—8 x 5 mm, solitary, sessile at tip
of axillary shoots; involucral bracts in 5 or 6 series, inner
exceeding flowers, tips subopaque, white, very acute.
Receptacle nearly smooth. Flowers ± 23—30, 7-11
male, 16—21 bisexual, yellow, tipped pink. Achenes ±
0,75 mm long, elliptic. Pappus bristles very many,
equalling corolla, scabridulous. Chromosome number:
2n = 22. Figure 23B.
New taxa
The name of a new taxon must be accompanied by at
least a Latin diagnosis. Authors should not provide full-
length Latin descriptions unless they have the required
expertise in Latin at their disposal. It is recommended
that descriptions of new taxa be accompanied by a good
illustration (line drawing or photograph) and a distribu-
tion map.
Example:
109. Helichrysum jubilatum Hilliard, sp. nov. H.
alsinoidei DC. affinis, sed foliis ellipticis (nee spatula-
tis), inflorescentiis compositis a foliis non circumcinctis,
floribus femineis numero quasi dimidium hermaphrodi-
torum aequantibus (nee capitulis homogamis vel floribus
femineis 1-3 tantum) distinguitur.
Herba annua e basi ramosa; caules erecti vel decum-
bentes, 100—250 mm longi, tenuiter albo-lanati, remote
foliati. Folia plerumque 8-30 x 5-15 mm, sub capi-
tulis minora, elliptica vel oblanceolata, obtusa vel acuta,
mucronata, basi semi-amplexicauli, utrinque cano-lana-
toarachnoidea. Capitula heterogama, campanulata,
3,5— 4,0 x 2,5 mm, pro parte maxima in paniculas cy-
mosas terminales aggregata; capitula subterminalia inter-
dum solitaria vel 2— 3 ad apices ramulorum nudorum ad
30 mm longorum. Bracteae involucrales 5-seriatae, gra-
datae, exteriores pellucidae, pallide stramineae, dorso
lanatae, seriebus duabus interioribus subaequalibus et
flores quasi aequantibus, apicibus obtusis opacis niveis
vix radiantibus. Receptaculum fere laeve. Flores ±
35-41. Achenia 0,75 mm longa, pilis myxogenis prae-
dita. Pappi setae multae, corollam aequantes, apicibus
scabridis, basibus non cohaerentibus.
TYPE. — Cape, Namaqualand Division, Richters-
veld, ± 5 miles E of Lekkersing on road to Stinkfontein,
kloof in hill south of the road, annual, disc whitish, 7 xi
1962, Nordenstam 1823 (S, holo.; E, NH, PRE).
PROOFS
Only galley proofs are normally sent to authors. They
should be corrected in red ink and be returned to the
editor as soon as possible.
REPRINTS
Authors receive 100 reprints gratis. If there is more
than one author, this number will have to be shared
between them.
DOCUMENTS CONSULTED
Guides to authors of the following publications were
made use of in the compilation of the present guide:
Annals of the Missouri Botanic Garden, Botanical Jour-
nal of the Linnean Society, Bothalia, Flora of Australia,
Smithsonian Contributions to Botany, South African
Journal of Botany (including instructions to authors of
taxonomic papers), South African Journal of Science.
ADDRESS OF EDITOR
Manuscripts should be submitted to: The Editor,
Bothalia, Botanical Research Institute, Private Bag
X 101, Pretoria 0001.
BOTHALIA
Volume 18,1
May/Mei 1988
CONTENTS — INHOUD
1. Studies in die Ericoideae (Ericaceae). VI. The generic relationship between Erica and Philippia in
southern Africa. E. G. H. OLIVER 1
2. A synopsis of the tribe Desmodieae (Fabaceae) in southern Africa. B. D. SCHRIRE 11
3. The naturalized species of Lupinus (Fabaceae) in southern Africa. C. H. STIRTON 25
4. Studies in the genus Lotononis (Crotalarieae, Fabaceae). 1. Three new species of the section Aulacinthus
from the Cape Province. B-E. VAN WYK 31
5. Studies in the genus Riccia (Marchantiales) from southern Africa. 8. R. campbelliana (subgenus Riccia),
newly recorded for the region. S. M. PEROLD and O. H. VOLK 37
6. Studies in the genus Riccia (Marchantiales) from southern Africa. 9. R. nigrella and the status of R.
capensis. S. M. PEROLD and O. H. VOLK 43
7. Two closely related species of Caloplaca (Teloschistaceae, Lichenes) from the Namib Desert. I. KARNE-
FELT 51
8. The Cheilanthes hirta complex and allied species (Adiantaceae/Pteridaceae) in southern Africa. W. B. G.
JACOBSEN and N. H. G. JACOBSEN 57
9. Solarium (Solanaceae) in Ghana. Z. R. BUKENYA and J. B. HALL 79
10. Notes on African plants:
Acarosporaceae. Lithoglypha, a new lichen genus from Clarens Sandstone. F. BRUSSE 89
Adiantaceae/Pteridaceae. Doryopteris pilosa, a new record from South Africa. W. B. G. JACOB-
SEN and N. H. G. JACOBSEN 90
Lamiaceae. Resuscitation of Syncolostemon ramulosus E. Mey. ex Benth. L. E. CODD 92
Porpidiaceae. A new species of Porpidia from the Drakensberg. F. BRUSSE 93
Porpidiaceae? Schizodiscus, a new porpidioid lichen genus from the Drakensberg. F. BRUSSE 94
11. The cigarette beetle Lasioderma serricorne (F.) (Coleoptera: Anobiidae): a serious herbarium pest.
E. RETIEF and A. NICHOLAS 97
12. Leaf anatomy of the South African Danthonieae (Poaceae). XVI. The genus Urochlaena. R. P. ELLIS .... 101
13. Ecology and population biology of Euphorbia perangusta (Euphorbiaceae) in the Transvaal, South Africa.
P. A. RAAL 105
14. Miscellaneous notes:
Chromosome studies on African plants. 6. J. J. SPIES and H. DU PLESSIS Ill
Chromosome studies on African plants. 7. J. J. SPIES and S. P. VOGES 114
Chromosome studies on African plants. 8. H. DU PLESSIS and J. J. SPIES 1 19
New programs for preliminary sequencing of releves and species in phytosociological data sets. R. H.
WESTFALL and B. C. DE WET 122
15. The identification of ‘Isicakathi’ and its medicinal use in Transkei. R. N. BOLOFO and C. T. JOHNSON 125
16. Obituary: Robert Allen Dyer (1900 -1987). L.E. CODD 131
17. Book reviews 135
i 8 . Guide for authors to Bothalia 137
Abstracted, indexed or listed in Biological Abstracts, Current Advances in Plant Science, Current Contents, Field Crop Abstracts, Forestry Abstracts,
Herbage Abstracts, Excerpta Botanica, Revue of Plant Pathology, Revue of Medical and Veterinary Mycology and The Kew Record of Taxonomic
Literature.
ISSN 0006 8241 * PRICE R15, 00 (GST excl.)
© and published by Botanical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and Water Supply, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001, South Africa. Printed
by the Government Printer, Bosman Street, Private Bag X85, Pretoria 0001. Tel. 323-9731 X 267. Obtainable from the Division of Agricultural
Information, Department of Agriculture and Water Supply, Private Bag X 144, Pretoria 000 1 , South Africa.