ISSN 0006 8241 = Bothalia
Bothalia
’N TYDSKRIF VIR PLANTKUNDIGE NAVORSING
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Vol. 18,2 Oct./Okt. 1988
BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE • DEPARTMENT OP AGRICULTURE AND WATER SUPPLY • REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
NAVORSINGSINSTITUUT VIR PLANTKUNDE • DEPARTEMENT VAN LANDBOU EN WATERVOORSIENING • REPUf JFK VAN SUID-AFRIKA
PUBLICATIONS OF THE BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
PUBLEKASIES VAN DIE NAVORSINGSINSTITUUT VIR PLANTKUNDE
Obtainable from the Division of Agricultural Information, De-
partment of Agriculture and Water Supply, Private Bag X144,
Pretoria 0001, Republic of South Africa. A current price list of
all available publications will be issued on request.
BOTHALIA
Bothalia is named in honour of General Louis Botha, first Premier
and Minister of Agriculture of the Union of South Africa. This
house journal of the Botanical Research Institute is devoted to
the furtherance of botanical science. The main fields covered
are taxonomy, ecology, anatomy and cytology. Two parts of the
journal and an index to contents, authors and subjects are publish-
ed annually.
Verkrygbaar van die Afdeling Landbou-inligting, Departement
van Landbou en Watervoorsiening, Privaatsak X144, Pretoria
0001, Republiek van Suid-Afrika. ’n Geldige lys van alle beskik-
bare publikasies kan aangevra word.
Bothalia is vernoem ter ere van Generaal Louis Botha, eerste Eerste
Minister en Minister van Landbou van die Unie van Suid-Afrika.
Hierdie lyfblad van die Navorsingsinstituut vir Plantkunde isgewy
aan die bevordering van die wetenskap van plantkunde. Die hoof-
gebiede wat gedek word, is taksonomie, ekologie, anatomie en
sitologie. Twee dele van die tydskrif en ’n indeks van die inhoud,
outeuxs en onderwerpe verskyn jaarliks.
MEMOIRS OF THE BOTANICAL SURVEY OF SOUTH AFRICA
MEMOIRS VAN DIE BOTANIESE OPNAME VAN SUID-AFRIKA
The memoirs are individual treatises usually of an ecological ’n Reeks van losstaande omvattende verhandelings oor vernaam-
nature, but sometimes dealing with taxonomy or economic lik ekologiese, maar soms ook taksonomiese of plantekonomiese
botany. onderwerpe.
THE FLOWERING PLANTS OF AFRICA / DIE BLOMPLANTE VAN AFRIKA
This serial presents colour plates of African plants with ac-
companying text. The plates are prepared mainly by the artists
at the Botanical Research Institute. Many well-known botanical
artists have contributed to the series, such as Cythna Letty (over
700 plates), Kathleen Lansdell, Stella Gower, Betty Connell,
Peter Bally and Fay Anderson. The Editor is pleased to receive
living plants of general interest or of economic value for
illustration.
From Vol. 50, one part of twenty plates is published annually. A
volume consists of two parts. The publication is available in Eng-
lish and Afrikaans.
Hierdie reeks bied kleurplate van Afrikaanse plante met bygaan-
de teks. Die skilderye word meestal deur die kunstenaars van die
Navorsingsinstituut vir Plantkunde voorberei. Talle bekende bota-
niese kunstenaars het tot die reeks bygedra, soos Cythna Letty
(meer as 700 plate), Kathleen Lansdell, Stella Gower, Betty Con-
nell, Peter Bally en Fay Anderson. Die Redakteur verwelkom
lewende plante van algemene belang of ekonomiese waarde vir
afbeelding.
Vanaf Vol. 50 word een deel, bestaande uit twintig plate, jaarliks
gepubliseer. ’n Volume bestaan uit twee dele. Die publikasie is
beskikbaar in Afrikaans en Engels.
FLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA / FLORA VAN SUIDELIKE AFRIKA
A taxonomic treatise on the flora of the Republic of South Africa,
Ciskei, Transkei, Lesotho, Swaziland, Bophuthatswana, South
West Africa/Namibia, Botswana and Venda. The FSA contains
descriptions of families, genera, species, infraspecific taxa, keys
to genera and species, synonymy, literature and limited specimen
citations, as well as taxonomic and ecological notes. Also available
in the FSA series are the following:
’n Taksonomiese verhandeling oor die flora van die Republiek
van Suid-Afrika, Ciskei, Transkei, Lesotho, Swaziland, Bophu-
thatswana, SWA/Namibie, Botswana en Venda. Die FSA bevat
beskrywings van families, genusse, spesies, infraspesifieke taksons,
sleutels tot genusse en spesies, sinonimie, literatuur, verwysings
na enkele eksemplare, asook beknopte taksonomiese en ekologiese
aantekeninge. Ook beskikbaar in die FSA-reeks is die volgende:
The genera of southern African flowering plants by/deur R.A. Dyer, Vol. 1 Dicotyledons (1975); Vol. 2
Monocotyledons (1976).
Keys to families and index to the genera of southern African flowering plants by/deur R.A. Dyer (1977).
Plant exploration of southern Africa by Mary Gunn & L.E. Codd. Obtainable from/Beskikbaar van:
A. A. Balkema Marketing, Box/Posbus 317, Claremont 7735, RSA.
PALAEOFLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA / PALAEOFLORA VAN SUIDELIKE AFRIKA.
A palaeoflora on a pattern comparable to that of the Flora of
southern Africa. Much of the information is presented in the
form of tables and photographic plates depicting fossil popula-
tions. Now available:
’n Palaeoflora met ’n uitleg vergelykbaar met die van die Flora
van suidelike Afrika. Baie van die inligting word aangebied in die
vorm van tabelle en fotografiese plate waarop fossiele populasies
afgebeeld word. Reeds beskikbaar:
Molteno Formation (Triassic) Vol. 1 Introduction. Dicroidium by/deur J.M. & H.M. Anderson.
Prodromus of South African Megafloras. Devonian to Lower Cretaceous by/deur J.M. & H.M. Anderson.
Obtainable from/Beskikbaar van: A. A. Balkema Marketing, Box/Posbus 317, Claremont 7735, RSA.
Republic of
South Africa
Republiek van
Suid-Afrika
BOTHALIA
’N TYDSKRIF VIR PLANTKUNDIGE NAVORSING
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Volume 18,2
Editor/ Redakteur: O.A. Leistner
Assisted by B.A. Momberg
D.F. Cutler
B. de Winter
P.H. Raven
J.P. Rourke
M.J. Werger
Editorial Board / Redaksieraad
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK
Botanical Research Institute, Pretoria, RSA
Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, USA
National Botanic Gardens, Kirstenbosch, RSA
University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Editorial Committee / Redaksiekomitee
B. de Winter
D.J.B. Killick
O.A. Leistner
B.A. Momberg
M.C. Rutherford
J.C. Scheepers
ISSN 0006 8241
Issued by the Botanical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and Water Supply, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001,
South Africa
Uitgegee deur die Navorsingsinstituut vir Plantkunde, Departement van Landbou en Watervoorsiening, Privaatsak X101,
Pretoria 0001, Suid-Afrika
1988
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2016
https://archive.org/details/bothaliavolume1818unse_0
CONTENTS - INHOUD
Volume 18,2
1. A revision of the genus Prionanthium (Poaceae: Arundineae). GERR1T DAV1DSE
2. Studies in the genus Riccia (Marchantiales) from southern Africa. 10. Two new white-scaled species of
the group ‘Squamatae’: R. argenteolimbata and R. albornata. O.H. VOLK, S.M. PEROLD and
T. BORNEFELD ,-5
3. Taxonomy and leaf anatomy of the genus Ehrharta (Poaceae) in southern Africa: the Dura group. G.E.
GIBBS RUSSELL and R.P. ELLIS 165
4. The Oxygonum dregeanum complex (Polygonaceae). G. GERMISHUIZEN 2 73
5. Notes on African plants:
Brassicaceae. Heliophila cornellsbergia, a new species from the Richtersveld. B.J. PIENAAR and
A. NICHOLAS 183
Ericaceae. Coilostigma zeyherianum — a correction. E.G.H. OLIVER
Geraniaceae. The correct author citation for Pelargonium section Otidia. P. VORSTER
Orchidaceae. Additions to the synonymy of Eulophia schweinfurthii. A. V. HALL jg^
Polygonaceae. Reinstatement of Oxygonum acetosella Welw. G. GERMISHUIZEN jg7
6. Fusarium tricinctum (Fungi: Hyphomycetes) in South Africa- morphology and pathogenicity.
SANDRA C. LAMPRECHT, W.F.O. MARASAS, P.S. VAN WYK and P.S. KNOX-DAVIES .... 189
7. Leaf anatomy of the South African Danthonieae (Poaceae). XVII. The genus Chaetobromus . R.P. ELLIS j 95
8. Flora of the Zuurberg National Park. 1 . Characterization of major vegetation units. B-E. VAN WYK,
P.A. NOVELLIE and C.M. VAN WYK 211
9. Flora of the Zuurberg National Park. 2. An annotated checklist of ferns and seed plants. B-E. VAN
WYK, C.M. VAN WYK and P.A. NOVELLIE 221
10. A synopsis of the plant communities of Swartboschkloof, Jonkershoek, Cape Province. D.J. McDONALD 233
11. A checklist of the flowering plants and ferns of Swartboschkloof, Jonkershoek, Cape Province. D.J.
McDONALD and M. MORLEY 261
12. Threatened plants of the eastern Cape: a synthesis of collection records. D.A. EVERARD 271
13. Description of a proteoid-restioid stand in Mesic Mountain Fynbos of the south-western Cape and some
aspects of its ecology. G. DAVIS 279
14. Miscellaneous notes:
The plant number scale — an improved method of cover estimation using variable-sized belt tran-
sects. R.H. WESTFALL and M.D.PANAGOS 289
15. New taxa, new records and name changes for southern African plants. G.E. GIBBS RUSSELL, W.G.
WELMAN, G. GERMISHUIZEN, E.'RETIEF, B.J. PIENAAR, C. REID, L. FISH, J. VAN ROOY,
C.M. VAN WYK, E.KALAKE and STAFF 293
16. Annual report of the Botanical Research Institute 1987/88 305
17. Obituary: Hermann Merxmuller (1920— 1988). JURKE GRAU (Translation: O.A. Leistner) 325
18. Book reviews 329
Bothalia 18,2: 143-153 (1988)
A revision of the genus Prionanthium (Poaceae : Arundineae)
GERRIT DAVIDSE*
Keywords: Arundineae, Cape, chromosome numbers, conservation, Poaceae, Prionanthium, taxonomic revision
ABSTRACT
Prionanthium is revised and three species are recognized. All three species have a chromosome number of n =7.
The genus is unusual in having multicellular, secretory glands on the glumes and a wide range of inflorescence
types. Prionanthium is considered to be arundinoid on the basis of its leaf anatomy, ciliate ligule, spikelet mor-
phology and, less strongly, chromosome number. Its chromosome number, multicellular glands, two florets per
spikelet, type of palea and rachilla extension relate it more closely to Pentaschistis than to any other extant
arundinoid genus. A fully illustrated taxonomic account is presented.
UITTREKSEL
Prionanthium word hersien en drie spesies word onderskei. A1 drie spesies het ’n chromosoomgetal van n =7.
Die genus is buitengewoon omdat dit meersellige afskeidingskliere op die glumas het en verskillende tipes bloei-
wyses het. Op grond van die blaaranatomie, gesilieerde tongetjie, blompakkiemorfologie en, in ’n mindere mate,
chromosoomgetal behoort Prionanthium tot die Arundineae. Die chromosoomgetal, meersellige kliere, twee
blommetjies per blompakkie, tipe palea en ragillaverlenging dui eerder op ’n verwantskap met Pentaschistis as
met enige ander bestaande genus in die tribus. ’n Volledige taksonomiese beskrywing word gegee.
INTRODUCTION
Prionanthium , a genus of three annual species, found
only in the Cape Province, is one of the rarest grass gene-
ra of southern Africa and one of the species has been
listed as endangered (Hall & Veldhuis 1985). The total
number of separate populations known is 14. While col-
lecting cytological specimens of grasses from the Cape,
we were able to locate populations of all three species
and this stimulated the following taxonomic revision.
Ellis (in prep.) will report in detail on the leaf blade
anatomy.
HISTORICAL review
The genus Prionanthium was first described by Des-
vaux (1831), who was unable to relate it to any other
genus known to him. He named the only species/*, rigi-
dum and gave its distribution as ‘India Oriental’, (India
and the East Indies). This was clearly an error, for the
illustration that he provided clearly indicates that P. ri-
gidum is the Cape species now known as P. dentatum.
Prionanthium was undoubtedly based on Thunberg’s
collection from the Cape, the only collection known of
the species until 1975, although this collection was not
specifically cited by Desvaux. However, Thunberg’s
collection had already been described by Linnaeus the
Younger (1781) as Phalaris dentata so that the correct
name for the type species, as pointed out by Henrard
(1941), is Prionanthium dentatum (L. f.) Henrard.
Nees (Lindley 1836) redescribed the genus as Prio-
nachne, basing it on the second known species, P. eck-
lonii, and later (Nees 1841) illegitimately renamed Prio-
nachne as Chondrolaena .
* Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St Louis, Missouri
63166, USA.
MS. received: 1988.03.30.
The third species, P. pholiuroides , was described by
Stapf (1899).
For more than two centuries, the genus was asso-
ciated with a mixture of genera (often recognized as
subtribes (cf. Pilger 1954; Zotov 1963)) that would be
termed avenoid and arundinoid in modern terms (cf.
Clayton & Renvoize 1986). Following Hubbard’s (1948)
formal recognition of the tribe Danthonieae, Chippindall
(1955) was the first to explicitly and exclusively associate
Prionanthium with arundinoid genera in the modem
sense of Clayton & Renvoize (1986). This placement has
been followed by De Wet (1956), Brown (1977), Ren-
voize (1981, 1986), Clayton & Renvoize (1986) and
Watson et al. (1 986).
MORPHOLOGY
There are several morphological features which merit
discussion beyond that provided in the formal descrip-
tions of the taxonomic section.
Multicellular, presumably secretory, glands occur on
the glumes of all three species. They are of two kinds:
stalked in P. dentation (Figures 1A, B; 2C) and P. eck-
lonii (Figure 1C, D) and sessile in P. pholiuroides (Figures
IE, F, H; 2D). The stalked glands are approximately
cylindrical in shape with sloping bases. They are com-
posed of 16 rows of cells in circumference. The apex is
rounded with a shallow, basin-like depression in the
centre surrounded by a low, heavily cutinized lip. The
apices of the glands illustrated for P. ecklonii (Figure
ID) have apparently been slightly distorted through
shrinkage. At the bottom of the basin-like depression
is a rectangular grid formed by the raised, rigid, anti-
clinal adjacent cell walls of small, square cells (Figure
1H). The stalks of the glands tend to be longer toward
the apex of the glume in both P. dentatum (Figure 1A)
and/*, ecklonii (Figure 1C).
144
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
FIGURE 1. — Multicellular, secretory glands of Prionanthium. A-B, Prionanthium dentatum, Davidse
33394, on keel of glume: A, inner view of glume with stalked glands along the keel, X 20; B, stalked
glands, X 100. C-D, P. ecklonii, Davidse 34018 : C, inner view of glume with stalked glands along
the keel, X 20; D, stalked glands, X 100. E-H, P. pholiuroides : E-F, H, sessile glands on keel of
glume, Davidse 33983 ; E, inner view of glume, X 20; F, sessile glands, X 100; G, Davidse 34053,
glandless glume, keel with only prickles, X 100; H, close-up of sessile gland from Figure IF, X 360.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
145
FIGURE 2. — Morphology of Prionanthium species. A, habit
of P. ecklonti, Davidse 34018. B-D, inner view of glumes:
B, P. ecklonti, Davidse 34018\ C, P. dentatum, Davidse
33394 ; D, P. pholiuroides, Duthie sn.
The sessile glands of P. pholiuroides are basically
elliptical in outline to nearly circular in the smaller
ones (Figure IF, H). The cutinized Up arises directly
from the surface of the glume and is more massive than
in P. dentatum and P. ecklonti. The central depression
of the gland has the same type of grid as the other two
species (Figure IF, H).
The glands occur primarily along the midnerve of
both glumes, but they are completely absent in some
plants of three populations of P. pholiuroides (Struis-
baai, Davidse 34048, 34053 (Figure 1G); Stellenbosch
Flats, Duthie 1 76 7; Gordons Bay, Parker 3745). In one
other population ( Duthie s.n. in PRE-39169) of this
species, they may occur on some of the lateral nerves
in addition to the midnerve (Figure 2D).
Multicellular, secretory glands are rare in the Poaceae
as a whole, but they occur in about half of the species of
Pentaschistis, an arundinoid genus centred primarily in
South Africa. In the glandular Pentaschistis species, mul-
ticellular, secretory glands occur on the leaves and in-
florescence branches as well as on the glumes. Further-
more, in addition to stalked and sessile, multicellular
glands, sunken glands also occur, for example in the leaf
blade of P. angustifolia (Nees) Stapf and P. setifolia
(Thunb.) McClean (Ri\ Ellis pers. comm.).
For comparison, glands of two species of Pentaschistis
were examined in detail. In P. airoides (Nees) Stapf, the
glands on the inflorescence branches are fundamentally
similar to those of Prionanthium pholiuroides in being
sessile with a prominent, heavily cutinized Up, surround-
ing a central depression with a reticulate grid (Figure
3A). In the marginal, sessile leaf glands of P. aspera, the
internal structure of the depression is more elaborate.
The longitudinal cell walls of the grid in the central de-
pression have developed to a size approximately half as
large as the lip, and so form prominent ribs (Figure 3B).
Evidently, Pentaschistis has a more diverse array of glands,
although at least one kind is fundamentally similar to
those of Prionanthium.
Multicellular glands also occur in many species of
Eragrostis where they are always sessile, in the Clavelli-
gera group of Panicum, where they are prominently
stalked, and in Sporobolus heterolepis (A. Gray) A. Gray,
where they are raised bands on the pedicels (Bessey
1884). In some Eragrostis species the basic structure is
quite similar to that of Prionanthium (Nicora 1941),
whereas those of Panicum are quite different with long,
slender stalks supporting a spherical cluster of paren-
chyma cells and have been termed multicellular glandu-
lar macrohairs (Kabuye & Wood 1969).
The function of the glands in Prionanthium is not
known. In some freshly collected specimens of P. pholi-
uroides the glands were glistening with a thin layer of
moisture which I assume to indicate active secretion.
In very glandular species of Pentaschistis, such a &P. aspera
(Thunb.) Stapf, P. angulata (Nees) Adamson,/*, angusti-
folia (Nees) Stapf and others, the plants may be sticky
and/or produce an unpleasant smell. The volatile sub-
stance that is produced is not known. I did not detect
any kind of odour in any species of Prionanthium. In
Pentaschistis, at least in those species that produce it
146
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
FIGURE 3. — Multicellular, secre-
tory glands of Pentaschistis .
A, Pentaschistis airoides,
Davidse 34006 , sessile gland
on pedicel, X 310; B, Pen-
taschistis aspera, Ellis 5439,
sessile gland on leaf margin,
X 310.
copiously, the volatile substance may be an anti-herbivore
mechanism. It is possible that in Prionanthium the glands
produce a sticky substance that would allow mature
spikelets with caryopses to be dispersed through ad-
hesion to animals. I could not investigate this matter
because all populations that I observed in the field were
too young.
Inflorescences in Prionanthium display a distinct re-
duction series. The inflorescence of P. dentatum is the
most unspecialized. It is a condensed panicle that is
superficially spike-like. The short panicle branches are
tightly appressed to the axis of the panicle. In P. ecklonii
most of the inflorescence branches are reduced to pedicels
only and they occur in pairs, one short-pedicelled (near-
ly sessile) the other longer-pedicelled. Only at the base
of vigorous inflorescences is one order of elongated in-
florescence branches developed, and the spikelets are
paired on these branches, except for the apex, as they
are on the main rachis of the inflorescence. Towards the
apex of the inflorescence the paired arrangement is lost
and the spikelets are solitary. In P. pholiuroides the
solitary arrangement of the spikelets is maintained
throughout the inflorescence. In very depauperate speci-
mens of this species the inflorescence may be reduced to
a few, or exceptionally, to a single spikelet.
Except for the non-disarticulating rachis, the structure
of a P. ecklonii inflorescence superficially resembles a
typical andropogonoid raceme, in that the spikelets are
paired and borne unilaterally. As inmost Andropogoneae
the glumes have a much firmer texture than the lemmas
and there are two functional florets. The inflorescence
of P. pholiuroides is clearly even further reduced.
The existence of this transitional series of inflores-
cence types in a small genus is remarkable and clearly
demonstrates how racemose inflorescence types in the
Poaceae can readily arise through a series of progressive
reductions from the paniculate condition. That this has
happened repeatedly in the Poaceae is evident from the
fact that of the 40 tribes recognized in the family by
Clayton & Renvoize (1986), 24 have a racemose type of
inflorescence in at least one of their constituent species.
The lodicules of Prionanthium are fleshy, cuneate,
shallowly one or three-lobed, lack microhairs or cilia
at the apex (Figure 4A— D), and generally have two vas-
cular bundles. They clearly fall within the variation range
encountered in the Arundineae (Tomlinson 1985; Clay-
ton & Renvoize 1986). In P. dentatum (Figure 4 A) the
lodicules have a more prominent lateral lobe than those
in P. pholiuroides (Figure 4B) and P. ecklonii (Figure
FIGURE 4. — Lodicules of Prio-
nanthium species. A, P. den-
tatum, Davidse 33394, in-
ner and outer view of a
pair of lodicules with cut-
off, hairy lemma at the
base, X 150; B, P. pholiu-
roides, Spies 3678, inner
view of old, slightly dis-
torted lodicule, X 150.
C-D, P. ecklonii, Davidse
34018: C, inner view of
lodicule, X 175; D, pair
of lodicules at the base
of the palea with lemma
and ovary cut off, X 85.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
147
4C, D), and, in comparison to these two species, their
point of attachment is further away from the palea, i.e.,
they are positioned more toward the dorsal side of the
lemma. The lodicules of the latter two species are very
similar.
The fruit of Prionanthium has never been described.
That of P. dentatum still remains unknown but in both
P. pholiuroides (Figure 5A, B) and P. ecklonii (Figure
5C, D) it is a caryopsis with the pericarp fused to the
seed coat. It is narrowly lanceolate in outline, slightly
convex on the embryo side and grooved on the hilum
side. The hilum is linear. In P. pholiuroides the hilum
groove is nearly as long as the caryopsis and is uniformly
deep (Figure 5B). In P. ecklonii the hilum groove is V2— ■ */„
as long as the caryopsis and is deep in the lower half of
the caryopsis but rather shallow in the upper half (Figure
5D). The embryo is V4-3/10 as long as the caryopsis. The
caryopsis is held loosely between the lemma and palea.
In all respects the caryopsis morphology is typical of
arundinoids.
The manner is which the spikelet disarticulates at
caryopsis maturity is, however, not entirely typical of
arundinoids. As is the norm in the subfamily, disarticu-
lation takes place between the florets, and the glumes
are long-persistent. However, the florets containing the
caryopsis are not shed immediately but each of the two
florets of a spikelet is held between the incurved margins
of the subtending glume. Although the process of dis-
articulation has not been observed beyond this point in
the field, inferences from mature plants of P. ecklonii
and P. pholiuroides which contained a high percentage
of mature caryopses in their spikelets, suggest that the
following events are probable: the florets containing the
caryopses remain enclosed within the glumes for a long
time after the caryopses have matured and after the
plants have died. Presumably the glumes break off
simply due to mechanical wear as the plants disintegrate
during the dry season. Mature inflorescences, with most
spikelets bearing caryopses, which were soaked in water
did not show any noticeable hygroscopic activity of the
glumes or florets under laboratory conditions. Further-
more, it is likely that the upper floret breaks off first
since the upper glume is very prominently hinged and
breaks off more easily than the lower one. This process
seems consistent with the tougher, chartaceous nature
of the glumes compared with the delicate, hyaline florets,
and this suggests that the function of protecting the
caryopsis has been taken over from the lemmas and
paleas by the glumes.
CYTOLOGY
No chromosome counts have ever been reported for
any species of the genus. Young inflorescences were col-
lected in Camoy’s fixative in the field. Anthers were
squashed in aceto-carmine to which a small amount of
iron-acetate was added. Photomicrographs of chromo-
some complements were made with a Reicherdt Univar
microscope.
All species had n = 7 with regular bivalent pairing and
no meiotic irregularities (Table 1; Figure 6A— D). The
only chromosomal irregularity was the occurrence of a
small B-chromosome in one sample ( Davidse 34048 ) of
P. pholiuroides (Figure 6E, F). Besides its small size, it
stained slightly lighter and behaved differently from the
normal bivalents (Figure 6E, F), three characteristics
that define B-chromosomes (Jones & Rees 1982). The
B-chromosome did not line up on the metaphase I plate
(Figure 6F), but since no micronuclei were observed in
the tetrads at the end of the second division it appears
that the B-chromosome is randomly incorporated into
any one of the tetrad nuclei. Due to a paucity of fixed
material in the right stage of meiosis, it was not possible
to study the behaviour of the B-chromosomes at the two
meiotic anr bases nor in pollen meiosis. Although B-
FIGURE 5. — Caryopses of Prio-
nanthium species. A-B,
P. pholiuroides, Ellis 5482A :
A, embryo side; B, hilum
side. C-D, P. ecklonii,
Ellis 5503 A: C, embryo
side; D, hilum side. All
X 17.
148
Bothalia 18,2(1988)
TABLE 1. — Chromosome numbers of Prionanthium species
Species
Chromosome no.
Locality and voucher
P. dentatum (L. f.) Henrard
P. ecklonii (Nees) Stapf
P. pholiuroides Stapf
n=7 CAPE. — 3319 (Calvinia): 16 km S of Nieuwoudtville (-AC), Davidse 33394.
n = 7 CAPE. — 3218 (Clan william): 45 km N of Citrusdal (-BD), Davidse 34018,
Spies 3693.
n=7 CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): 17 km W of Malmesbury (-BC), Davidse 33983,
Spies 36 78.
n = 7 + IB CAPE. — 3420 (Bredasdorp): 6 km N of Struisbaai (-CA), Davidse 34048.
chromosomes are generally considered to be genetically
inert, they often affect fertility, especially when present
in high numbers (Jones & Rees 1982). Nevertheless,
their occurrence in the population with the most variable
spikelet morphology is noteworthy. Although this varia-
tion is probably due to simple segregation and recombi-
nation, the possibility of a B-chromosome effect cannot
be entirely ruled out without further research.
FIGURE 6. — Meiotic chromo-
somes of Prionanthium spe-
cies. A-B, P. dentatum,
Davidse 33394, n = 7 : A,
diakinesis; B, metaphase
II. C, P. ecklonii, Davidse
34018, diakinesis, n = 7.
D-F, P. pholiuroides'. D,
Davidse 33983, anaphase I,
n = 7; E-F, Davidse 34048 ;
E, diakinesis, n =7 + IB;
F, metaphase I, B-chromo-
some excluded from the
metaphase plate. Arrows
point to B-chromosome.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
149
GENERIC RELATIONSHIPS
Although Chippindall (1955) expressed reservations
about the classification of Prionanthium in the Danthon-
ieae (= Arundineae, cf. Clayton & Renvoize 1986), it has
not been challenged since that time (De Wet 1956; Ren-
voize 1981; Watson et al. 1986; Clayton & Renvoize
1 986). 1 agree with this assessment based on data from leaf
anatomy, gross morphology and chromosome number.
Leaf anatomy has previously been studied by De Wet
(1956) and Renvoize (1981, 1986) in P. pholiuroides
and Watson et al. (1986) in an unspecified species. (Al-
though De Wet (1956) noted that he had studied P. eck-
lonii anatomically, the specimen that he cites as a voucher
apparently is one of the Duthie collections made in the
Stellenbosch Flats and actually represents P. pholiuroides.
His reference to ‘type’ is inexplicable if interpreted as
‘type collection’ since none of the Prionanthium type
collections originated in the Stellenbosch area. Perhaps
he meant to indicate the kind or ‘type of P. ecklonii
originating in Stellenbosch’, which, as I have just indi-
cated, represents P. pholiuroides .) A detailed study of
leaf blade anatomy will be presented by Ellis (in prep.).
From the published results it is clear that Prionanthium
is typically arundinoid in its anatomy. It has anon-Kranz
leaf anatomy that typifies most arundinoid genera, in-
cluding double bundle sheaths, non-radiate mesophyll
with a maximum lateral cell count greater than four,
adaxial ribs, bulliform cell groups not associated with
colourless cells, finger-like microhairs with tapering
distal cells, domed subsidiary cells and sinuous long cells
in the abaxial epidermis, and dumbbell-shaped to nodular
silica bodies. Two unusual features for the subfamily
were noted by Renvoize (1986): 1, the chlorenchyma
extends between the outer bundle sheath and upper
sclerenchyma girders or between upper and lower scle-
renchyma girders, a feature also noted by Watson et
al. (1986); 2, the upper and/or lower epidermal cells
are large and thin-walled. Although unequivocally arun-
dinoid, the anatomical evidence available to date is not
sufficient for a detailed comparison with other possibly
related genera.
All Prionanthium species have a ciliate ligule, a
characteristic that is shared with all other arundinoid
genera recognized by Clayton & Renvoize (1986).
The relationship of Prionanthium to other arundinoid
genera has only been explicitly discussed by Clayton &
Renvoize (1986: 165), who consider it to be one of the
primitive arundinoid genera, along with Tribolium,
Urochlaena, Elytrophorus, Spartochloa, Notochloe, Zen-
keria, Piptophyllum, and Styppeiochloa. They based
this assessment on the short glumes and multinerved
lemmas with entire tips of these genera. Furthermore,
they (Clayton & Renvoize 1986: 171) noted that ‘P.
dentatum hints at a distant relationship with Tribolium ’,
without indicating on which character(s) they made this
judgement. Presumably they suggested this relationship
because P. dentatum has the most fully developed panicle
of the three species and its proportionally short and broad
spikelets superficially resemble those of the Lasiochloa
alliance of Tribolium.
Four spikelet characters point to a relationship be-
tween Prionanthium and Pentaschistis : the occurrence
of well differentiated multicellular glands, two florets
per spikelet, a small rachilla extension above the upper
floret, and similar paleas. Since multicellular glands are
rare in the family, I consider this character especially
important in relating Prionanthium to Pentaschistis.
Although Prionanthium and Pentaschistis share a
number of features, their relationship is not a close one,
as many differences in spikelet characteristics demon-
strate. Of the three characters explicitly mentioned by
Clayton & Renvoize (1986) as typical of the primitive
Arundineae, Prionanthium does not differ strongly from
Pentaschistis in two: 1, short glumes (in both genera the
glumes are as long as the spikelet and are as long as or
longer than the uppermost floret); 2, awnless lemmas
(all species of Prionanthium , 10 out of ±65 species of
Pentaschistis ); 3, multinerved lemmas (3— 5-nerved in
Prionanthium and 5— 11-nerved in Pentaschistis).
The primary basic chromosome number of the Arun-
dinoideae has been considered to be x = 12 (Clayton &
Renvoize 1986). However, it is more likely that this is a
secondary base number derived by polyploidy, since a
number of arundinoid genera are now known with n = 6:
Tribolium (Davidse et al. in preparation, not x = 7 as in-
correctly reported by De Wet 1960 ), Merxmuellera and
Karroochloa (as Danthonia, De Wet 1954, 1960; Du
Plessis & Spies 1988; Spies & Du Plessis 1988), Chinoch-
loa (as Danthonia, Singh & Godward 1963), Schismus
(numerous reports, the latest Faruqi & Quraish 1979; Du
Plessis & Spies 1988 and Spies & Du Plessis 1988) and
Pseudopentameris (Spies & Du Plessis pers. comm.).
Stebbins (1956) and Hunziker & Stebbins (1987) also
consider x = 6 to be the basic chromosome number of
the Arundinoideae. Less common base numbers in the
subfamily are x = 7 and 13 in Pentaschistis (Tateoka
1965; Hedberg & Hedberg 1977). Prionanthium with
n = 7 has a number that is unusual for arundinoids but
one that is matched at the diploid level, n = 7, in part of
the genus Pentaschistis (De Wet 1954, 1960; Du Plessis
& Spies 1988; Spies & Du Plessis 1988). There is also a
resemblance between the two genera in the size of the
chromosomes, among the largest chromosomes in the
subfamily.
CONSERVATION STATUS
All three species of Prionanthium have been included
in the South African red data book (Hall & Veldhuis
1985). The status of both P. ecklonii and P. dentatum
(as P. rigidum ) is listed as uncertain, whereas P. pholiu-
roides is listed as endangered. From the fieldwork and
herbarium research that I conducted, it is apparent that
P. pholiuroides is the most widely distributed of the
three species (Figure 7). The population of P. pholiu-
roides reported on by Hall & Veldhuis (1985) was re-
visited on 21 September, 12 October and 16 November
1987 and still existed as a population of thousands of
individuals. However, the local distribution was very
spotty and clumped. Similar sites only a few kilometers
away lacked any sign of P. pholiuroides. It had also
managed to establish itself in a small area of disturbance
along the roadside. The main population grows in a
heavily over-grazed depression invaded by introduced
species of Acacia.
150
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
FIGURE 7. — Distribution of Prionanthium dentatum, ★ ; P.
ecklonii, ♦; P. pholiuroides, •.
We discovered a modest range extension for this
species ( Davidse 34048, 34053). Its total distributional
range, although very disjunct, is approximately 250 km,
and not 60 km as noted by Hall & Veldhuis (1985). At
this new site, the species grew on a limestone outcrop,
especially in small sandy soil pockets on the eroded
limestone. This indicates that its habitat requirements
may not be quite as specialized as believed by Hall &
Veldhuis (1985). It seems quite probable that the spe-
cies has been largely eliminated from localities such as
the Stellenbosch Flats, which have been extensively
urbanized. It was common there from the 1920s to at
least the 1940s, judging by the Duthie and Rehm col-
lections, and although I believe it likely that some plants
may still exist in the flats between Gordon’s Bay, Cape
Town and Stellenbosch, these are likely to be so few and
isolated that the species must for practical purposes be
considered extinct in this area. Thus, although the species
is on the whole rare, it may not be in immediate danger
of extinction.
TAXONOMY
Prionanthium Desv., Opuscules sur les sciences
physiques et naturelles: 65, t.4, fig. 3 (1831); Stapf: 455
(1899); Chippindall: 271 (1955); R.A. Dyer 2: 833
(1976); Watson et al.: microfiche 3 (1986); Clayton &
Renvoize: 170 (1986). Type: P. rigidum Desv. =P. den-
tatum (L. f.) Henrard.
Prionachne Nees in Lindley: 447 (1836). Chondro-
laena Nees: 133 (1841), nom. superfl. pro Prionachne.
Type: P. ecklonii Nees = Prionanthium ecklonii (Nees)
Stapf.
Annuals. Leaves linear; ligule a ciliate membrane. In-
florescence a spike-like panicle or a secund raceme or spike
bearing solitary or paired, subsessile or short-pedicellate
spikelets. Spikelets 2-flowered with a small rachilla ex-
tension, laterally compressed, keeled; disarticulation
above the glumes and between the florets. Glumes sub-
equal, with the lower slightly longer than the upper, as
long as the spikelets, slightly asymmetrical, keeled,
rigidly chartaceous and 5— 8-nerved in the centre, mem-
branous to hyaline marginally, long persistent after
spikelet maturity and each individually enclosing one of
the florets at caryopsis maturity; bases coriaceous and
hinged, the upper more prominently hinged than the
lower; keels usually with prominent, multicellular glands.
Florets bisexual. Lemmas hyaline, 3— 5-nerved, subequal,
nearly as long as or slightly shorter than the glumes,
covering the palea wings but not the palea keels at spike-
let maturity. Paleas nearly as long as or slightly shorter
than the lemmas, 2-nerved and 2-keeled, the back and
wings hyaline, narrow, the keels prominent, thickened,
well developed, exposed at spikelet maturity. Lodicules
2, cuneate, fleshy, glabrous, shallowly 1- or 3-lobed.
Stamens 3. Ovary glabrous; styles 2, separate; stigmas
plumose, laterally exserted. Caryopsis narrowly lanceo-
late in outline, convex on the embryo side, shallowly
grooved on the hilum side, especially toward the base;
hilum linear; embryo ± '/4 as long as the caryopsis.
By contrast, P. dentatum and P. ecklonii appear to
have a much more limited distribution and on this basis
must be considered to be endangered.
Not surprisingly for annual species, samples of P. pho-
liuroides {Ellis 5482 A) and P. ecklonii {Ellis 5503A)
collected in November 1987 showed good caryopsis
production. In both species, at random, five spikelets
from five different plants were examined for caryopsis
production in both the upper and lower florets. In P.
pholiuroides the lower florets had 92% caryopsis pro-
duction and the upper 88% . In P. ecklonii 96% of the
lower florets and 92% of the upper florets produced
caryopses.
All three species appear to be able to exist in areas of
moderate disturbance such as that encountered in the
typical grazed veld of the Cape. All three species also
grew on roadsides which may actually undergo less dis-
turbance than adjacent grazed veld since animals general-
ly do not have access to roadsides. However, road con-
struction projects could have drastic effects on these
small roadside populations since the vegetation may be
completely scraped off by heavy machinery at any time.
A genus of three species endemic to the Cape Province.
Key to species
la Florets pubescent 1 . P. dentatum
lb Florets glabrous:
2a Spikelets solitary; inflorescence usually unbranched;
glands on glume keels sessile or slightly stalked,
rarely absent 3. P. pholiuroides
2b Spikelets paired except solitary near the apex of the
inflorescence; inflorescence (except in depaupe-
rate specimens) with appressed branches at the
base; glands on glume keels conspicuously stalk-
ed 2. P. ecklonii
1. Prionanthium dentatum (L. f) Henrard in
Blumea 4: 530 (1941). Type: Cape, Bockland, 1773,
Thunberg s.n. (UPS, holo.— PRE, microf.!; PRE, frag-
ment!; BM!,K!,MO!).
Phalaris dentata L. f.: 106 (1781); Thunberg: 19 (1794).
Phleum dentatum (L. f.) Pers. 1: 79 (1805). Chilochloa dentata
(L. f.) Trin.: 168 (1824), nom. nud., 1: t. 73 (1827). Prionan-
thium rigidum Desv.: 65 (1831); Stapf: 455 (1899). Lasiochloa
pectinata Trin.: corr. & emend, t. 73 (1836), nom. illeg. superfl.
pro Phalaris dentata L. f. Chondrolaena dentata (L. f.) Steud. :
355 (1840). Prionachne dentata (L. f.) Nees: 134 (1841), pro
syn. Chondrolaena phalaroides Nees.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
151
Culms 30-430 mm tall, unbranched or branched
only at the base, glabrous. Sheaths short-pubescent;
ligule 0,5- 1,4 mm long, the membrane 0,05—0,2 mm
long, the cilia 0,4— 1,3 mm long; blades 15-105 x 0,5—
3,0 mm, short-pubescent. Inflorescence a condensed,
cylindrical spike-like panicle, 5-75 mm long, reduced to
a single spikelet in depauperate individuals; rachis cylin-
drical, pubescent; branches tightly appressed to the
rachis, shortened upward; pedicels short stumps or to 1
mm long. Spikelets 3,2— 5,2 mm long, not obviously
borne in pairs, laterally arranged; glumes 5— 7 -nerved,
the side facing the rachis pubescent (Figures 1 A, 2C), the
hyaline margin broader than the chartaceous centre, the
keel with prominent stalked glands, the tip shortly awn-
pointed; lemmas evenly pubescent, 3-nerved, shortly
awn-pointed; paleas glabrous on the margins, pubescent
on the back; anthers 1,8— 2,3 mm long. Chromosome
number : 2n = 14 (Figure 6A, B).
Only known from the Nieuwoudtville area of the
western Cape at an elevation of ± 700 m in Western
Mountain Karoo (Figure 7).
Vouchers: Davidse 33394, 33396; Ellis 2452, 5416, 5417.
Nees (1841) and Chase & Niles (1962), among others,
considered Thunberg’s (1794) Phalaris dentata to be new
and different from the Phalaris dentata of Linnaeus
(1781). This is incorrect because both names are based
on Thunberg’s collection from ‘Bockland’ (= Bokkeveld).
This is clear from Juel’s (1918) account explaining how
Linnaeus published hundreds of new species based on
Thunberg’s Cape collections. I interpret Thunberg’s usage
to be based on Linnaeus’s (1781) name without proper
attribution and using a different and original descrip-
tion. For this reason, I consider all other combinations
made with the epithet dentatum to be based on Lin-
naeus’s (1781) initial usage of this name.
Until Ellis re-collected it in 1975, this species was
only known from the type collection made by Thunberg
in 1773. Thunberg’s collection, however, was a large one
and a number of duplicate specimens were distributed
to other herbaria so that very good type material exists.
2. Prionanthium ecklonii (Nees) Stapf in Flora
capensis 7: 456 (1899); Chippindall: 271 (1955). Type:
‘C. b. sp.’ (Cape of Good Hope). Lectotype (chosen here):
ad Olifantsrivier fluviam alt. I, Clan william, Ecklon s.n.
(MO!; BM, isolecto.!; PRE, fragment!; US, isolecto.!).
Prionachne ecklonii Nees in Lindley: 448 (1836). Chondro-
laena phalaroides Nees: 134 (1841), nora. illeg. superfl. pro Pri-
onachne ecklonii. Chondrolaena phalaroides Nees var. dentata
Nees: 134 (1841).
Culms 190—370 mm tall, usually branched, purple,
glabrous. Sheaths puberulous or glabrous, usually ciliate.
Ligule 0,3— 0,6 mm long, the membrane 0,05-0,1 mm
long, the cilia 0,3— 0,5 mm long; blades 40-160 x 0,5—
1,5 mm, glabrous or appressed pubescent. Inflorescence
an inconspicuously secund spike-like raceme or panicle,
15—95 mm long; rachis cylindrical, glabrous to sparsely
puberulent; branches 30 mm long, tightly appressed to
the main rachis; pedicels unequal stumps. Spikelets
4;4_6,1 mm long, usually borne in pairs in the middle
part of the inflorescence, solitary toward the apex of
the inflorescence and its branches, laterally arranged,
the pairs borne alternately; glumes 5— 8-nerved, the side
facing the rachis pubescent, narrower, 1— 3-nerved, the
side away from the rachis usually broader and glabrous,
sometimes sparsely pubescent, 3— 4-nerved, the midrib
with prominent, stalked multicellular glands; lemmas
hyaline but herbaceous at the tip, sometimes scaberu-
lous on the midrib, otherwise glabrous, 3-nerved; paleas
glabrous, usually bilobed at the apex, sometimes sparsely
ciliate at the apex; anthers 2,9— 3,9 mm long; caryopsis
2,5— 3,2 mm long, the hilum V2 — 4/s as long as the cary-
opsis (Figure 5D). Chromosome number'. 2n = 14 (Figure
6C).
Only known from the south-western Cape Province at
low elevations, rare, in Coastal Renosterveld (Figure 7).
Vouchers: Davidse 34018; Drege s.n.; Ecklon s.n.; Ecklon
& Zeyher s. n. ; Spies 36 93.
This species was until recently only known from three
collections, two made by Ecklon and one by Drege.
When Nees (in Lindley 1836) described Prionachne eck-
lonii, he did not indicate a type and only a general geo-
graphical distribution was provided. However, from his
use of Ecklon’s name as the epithet and the fact that all
three of the collections had been available to him by
1836 (Gunn & Codd 1981), it is clear that he was basing
his species on these collections. This is confirmed from a
later publication (Nees 1841), dedicated to Drege, Ecklon
and Zeyher, where he redescribed and renamed this
species as Chondrolaena phalaroides with two varieties,
var. dentata and var. edentula, and explicitly cited the
Ecklon and Drege collections. He also referred to his
1836 treatment of Prionachne in the synonymy. Unfor-
tunately he did not directly refer to P. ecklonii but made
the new, but illegitimate, combination Prionachne den-
tata. This new synonym was based on Linnaeus’s (1781)
Phalaris dentata, which was also cited in synonymy, but
was in fact misapplied. The fact that Nees explicitly
states that he was publishing a substitute name for his
Prionachne indicates that he considered Chondrolaena
phalaroides and Prionachne ecklonii to be the same
species. Accordingly I have chosen to lectotypify Prio-
nanthium ecklonii with the Ecklon collection from the
Olifantsrivier. This preserves the usage that Stapf (1899)
initiated in his excellent treatment of the genus in Flora
capensis.
Nees (1841) did not truly understand the differences
between the two species that had been collected by this
time. This is apparent from the fact that he synonymiz-
ed Phalaris dentata (= Prionanthium dentatum ) with his
new species Chondrolaena phalaroides (= Prionanthium
ecklonii ). When he renamed Prionachne ecklonii as
Chondrolaena phalaroides, he recognized two varieties,
var. dentata and var. edentida. Under var. dentata he
listed all but one of the combinations and usages of this
name, including his own illegitimate new combination,
Prionachne dentata. He excluded Thunberg’s (1794,
1813) interpretation of Phalaris dentata because he felt
that Thunberg’s description, which was substantially
■different from that of Linnaeus (1781), could not apply
to the same species. In fact, Thunberg’s descriptive state-
ments queried by Nees, spike ‘subpaniculatum’ and
'glumas ovatas’, do apply to Prionanthium dentatum,
especially in contrast to the inflorescence and glume
152
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
shapes of P. ecklonii. Actually, Thunberg’s entire glume
description (glumae ovatae, concavae, glabrae, bimargi-
natae vel cinctae, intra marginem linea duplici aut tri-
plici elevata, viridi, sinuato-serratae) applies very well
to the two glumes considered as a single unit. Further-
more, Thunberg (1794) explicitly cites the locality of
the collection (crescit in Bockland) which leaves no
doubt that it was based on his own collection from the
Cape, which was, as noted before, also studied by Lin-
naeus (1781).
Nees’s var. edentula should be referred to Prionan-
thium pholiuroides (see the discussion following that
species).
3. Prionanthium pholiuroides Stapf in Flora
capensis 7: 456 (1899). Chippindall: 271 (1955). Type:
Cape, Fish Hoek Valley, damp hollow, Nov. 1897,
Wolley Dod 3394 (K, holo.!; BM!, BOL!, MO!, PRE!).
Chondrolaena phalaroides Nees var. edentula Nees: 134
(1841). Type: not located, probably destroyed at B.
Prionachne pholiuroides (Stapf) Phillips: 6, t.63 (1931).
Culms 40—250 mm tall, usually branched, purple,
glabrous. Sheaths glabrous; ligules 0,3— 0,9 mm long,
the membrane 0,1— 0,3 mm long, the cilia 0,2— 0,7 mm
long; blades 15—70 x 0,5— 1,5 mm, glabrous below;
scaberulous above. Inflorescence a secund, 2-ranked
spike, 15—60 mm long; rachis triquetrous, curved out-
ward at spikelet insertion, glabrous to scaberulous; pedi-
cel reduced to a stump. Spikelets 3,1— 7,0 mm long, the
terminal one longest, usually borne singly and alternate-
ly on the rachis, the lateral side of the lower glume of
each spikelet appressed to the rachis; glumes 7— 8-nerved,
the midrib and sometimes some or all the nerves with
prominent sessile glands, rarely eglandular with prickles
on the keels (Figure 1G), glabrous, except pubescent on
the inner side of the lower glume, rarely also puberulent
on the outer side of the lower glume or completely
glabrous; lemmas hyaline but herbaceous in the middle
toward the apex and slightly scabrous, otherwise glabrous,
the lower 3-5-nerved, the upper 3-nerved; paleas gla-
brous; anthers 1,8-3, 5 mm long. Caryopsis 2, 5-3,0
mm long, the hilum nearly as long as the caryopsis
(Figure 5B). Chromosome number : 2n = 14 and 14 + IB
(Figure 6D— F).
Only known from the Cape Province, at low eleva-
tions, rare, primarily in shallow depressions that tempo-
rarily collect water (Figure 7).
Vouchers: Anderson 8; Davidse 33983; Duthie 1767; Ellis
5434; Rehm 6054.
When Nees (1841) described Chondrolaena phalaroi-
des var. edentula, he described the glumes as non-dentate
(i.e., lacking stalked, multicellular glands) and the spike-
lets as entirely alternate (i.e., spikelets borne singly on
the rachis). This description applies well to Prionanthium
pholiuroides, especially when contrasted to P. ecklonii.
Nees also noted that he only saw a fragment of this
taxon, intermixed with other specimens. Presumably
this fragment was included with one of the three cited
specimens, although he does not specify which one. All
three were presumably destroyed since all his Poaceae
specimens were acquired by B in 1855 (Stafleu & Cowan
1981). I have not seen similar fragments or specimens
among duplicates of the Ecklon and Drege collections
that I have examined. Nees suspected it to represent a
new species, but, presumably because of the fragmentary
nature of the specimen, decided to recognize it at a
lower rank.
A recently discovered population near Struisbaai
( Davidse 34048, 34053 ) is quite variable in spikelet
morphology. It has the smallest spikelets of all known
populations, 3, 1-5, 2 mm versus 4, 5-7,0 mm for all
others. However, more importantly, individual plants
within the population have spikelets with glumes that
vary from completely eglandular and glabrous to those
that are typically glandular and pubescent on the inner
side, to glandular-glabrous, or eglandular-pubescent.
Since these plants are seemingly segregating for these
characters, these variations are not taxonomically re-
cognized. The Malmesbury population represented by
Davidse 33459 is variable with regard to glabrous and
pubescent spikelets. The only population, apparently
now extinct, with glands on nerves other than the mid-
nerve of the glumes, is the Stellenbosch Flats population
sampled by Duthie from 1925 to 1928.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I thank the Department of Agriculture and Water
Supply for the fellowship which enabled me to conduct
this research in South Africa and the Botanical Research
Institute, for research facilities. I am grateful to B. de
Winter and M. de Winter for their very generous hospital-
ity during my time in South Africa. I thank R.P. Ellis
and J.J. Spies for their helpful assistance in all aspects of
my stay in South Africa. I also thank S.S. Brink, G.
Condy, J. Davidse, H.duPlessis, J.D.Dwyer, H.Ebertsohn,
A. Fellingham, L. Fish, R.E. Gereau, G.E. Gibbs Russell,
H.P. Linder, E.G.H. Oliver, S.M. Perold, C. Reid for
assistance in the fieldwork, research, and preparation of
the manuscript. I thank the curators of BM, BOL, K,
MO, PRE, STE, and US for making their specimens avail-
able for study.
REFERENCES
BESSEY, C.E. 1884. Glands on a grass. American Naturalist
18: 420-421.
BROWN, W.V. 1977. The Kranz syndrome and its subtypes in
grass systematics. Memoirs of the Torrey Botanical Club
23: 1-97.
CHASE, A. & NILES, C.D. 1962. Index to grass species. Vol. 3.
Hall, Boston.
CHIPPINDALL, L. 1955. A guide to the identification of grasses
in South Africa. In C. Meredith, The grasses and pastures
of South Africa. Central News Agency, Cape Town.
CLAYTON, W.D. & RENVOIZE, S.A. 1986. Genera graminum.
Kew Bulletin Additional Series 13: 1-389.
DESVAUX, A.-N. 1831. Opuscules sur les sciences physiques et
naturelles. Pavie, Angers.
DE WET, J.M.J. 1954. The genus Danthonia in grass phylogeny.
American Journal of Botany 41: 204-211.
DE WET, J.M.J. 1956. Leaf anatomy and phylogeny in the tribe
Danthonieae. American Journal of Botany 43: 175-182.
DE WET, J.M.J. 1960. Chromosome numbers and some mor-
phological attributes of various South African grasses.
American Journal of Botany 47 : 44-49.
DU PLESSIS, H. & SPIES, J.J. 1988. Chromosome studies on
African plants. 8. Bothalia 18: 119—122.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
153
DYER, R.A. 1976. The genera of southern African flowering
plants. Vol. 2. Botanical Research Institute, Pretoria.
ELLIS, R.P. in prep. Leaf anatomy of Prionanthium (Poaceae:
Arundineae). Bothalia.
FARUQUI, S.A. & QURAISH, H.B. 1979. Studies on Libyan
grasses. V. Population variability and distribution of
Schismus arabicus and S. barbatus in Libya. Pakistan Jour-
nal of Botany 1 1 : 167-172.
GUNN, M. & CODD, L.E. 1981. Botanical exploration of south-
ern Africa. Balkema, Cape Town.
HALL, A.V. & VELDHUIS, H.A. 1985. South African red data
book. Plants — fynbos and karoo biomes. South African
National Scientific Programmes Report No. 117: 1-160.
HEDBERG, I. & HEDBERG, O. 1977. Chromosome numbers of
afroalpine and afromontane angiosperms. Botaniska notiser
130: 1-24.
HENRARD, J.T. 1941. Notes on the nomenclature of some gras-
ses. Blumea 4: 496-538.
HUBBARD, C.E. 1948. Gramineae. In J. Hutchinson, British
flowering plants. Gawthorn, London.
HUNZKER, J.H. & STEBBINS, G.L. 1987.’ ChromosomaTevo-
lution in the Gramineae. In T.R. Soderstrom, K.W. Hilu,
C.S. Campbell & M.E. Barkworth, Grass systematics and
evolution. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington DC.
JONES, R.N. & REES, M. 1982. B-chromosomes. Academic Press,
London.
JUEL, H.O. 1918. Plantae thunbergiame. A.-B Akademiska Bok-
handeln, Uppsala.
KABUYE, C.H.S. & WOOD, D. 1969. A first record of multicel-
lular glandular hairs in the Gramineae. Botanical Journal
of the Linnean Society 62: 69-70.
LINDLEY, J. 1836. A natural system of botany. Longman,
London.
LINNAEUS, C. 1781. Supplementum plantarum. Impensis or-
phanotrophei, Brunsvigae.
NEES AB ESENBECK, C.G. 1841. Florae africae australioris il-
lustrationes monographicae. Prausnitzianis, Glogaviae.
NICORA, E.G. 1941. Contribution al estudio histologico de las
glandulas epidermicas de algunas especies de Eragrostis.
Darwiniana 5 : 316-321.
PERSOON, C.H. 1805. Synopsis plantarum. Carol. Frid. Crame-
rum, Paris.
PHILLIPS, E.P. 1931. An introduction to the study of the South
African grasses. Central News Agency, Johannesburg.
PILGER, R. 1954. Das System der Gramineae. Botanische Jahr-
biicherl6: 281-384.
RENVOIZE, S.A. 1981. The subfamily Arundinoideae and its
position in relation to a general classification of the Gram-
ineae. Kew Bulletin 36: 85-102.
RENVOIZE, S.A. 1986. A survey of leaf-blade anatomy in gras-
ses VIII. Arundinoideae. Kew Bulletin 41: 323-342.
SINGH, D.N. & GODWARD, M.B.E. 1963. Cytological studies
in the Gramineae. II. Heredity 18: 538-540.
SPIES, J.J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1988. Chromosome studies of
African plants. 6. Bothalia 18: 111-114.
STAFLEU, F.A. & COWAN, R.S. 1981. Taxonomic literature.
VoL 3. Bohn, Scheltema & Hoekema, Utrecht.
STAPF, O. 1899. Gramineae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora
capensis 7: 310-750. Reeve, London.
STEBBINS, G.L. 1956. Cytogenetics and evolution of the grass
family. American Journal of Botany 43: 890-905.
STEUDEL, E. 1840. Nomenclator botanicus, Edn 2. Vol. 1.
Cottae, Stuttgartiae.
TATEOKA, T. 1965. Chromosome numbers of some grasses from
Madagascar. Botanical Magazine, Tokyo 78: 306—311.
THUNBERG, C.P. 1794. Prodromus plantarum capensium. Ed-
man, Uppsala.
THUNBERG, C.P. 1813. Flora capensis. Litteris Joh. Fr. Edman,
Upsaliae.
TOMLINSON, K.L. 1985. Comparative anatomical studies in
Danthonia sensu lato (Danthonieae: Poaceae). Aliso 11:
97-114.
TRINIUS, C.B. 1824. De graminibus unifloris et sesquifloris. Im-
pensis Academiae imperialis scientiarum, Petropoli.
TRINIUS, C.B. 1827. Species graminum. Vol. 1. Impensis Aca-
demiae imperialis scientiarum, Petropoli.
TRINIUS, C.B. 1836. Species graminum. Vol. 3. Impensis Aca-
demiae imperialis scientiarum, Petropoli
WATSON, L., DALLWITZ, M.J. & JOHNSTON, C.R. 1986. Grass
genera of the world: 728 detailed descriptions from an
automated database. Australian Journal of Botany 34:
223-230.
ZOTOV, V.D. 1963. Synopsis of the grass subfamily Arundin-
oideae in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany
1: 78-136.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
Adamson 3268 (3) BOL, BM, NBG; Anderson 8 (3) BOL, K,
MO, PRE, STE.
Davidse 33394 (1) BOL, MO, NBG, PRE; 33396 (1) MO, PRE;
33459 (3) BOL, MO, NBG, PRE; 33983 (3) BOL, MO, NBG,
PRE; 34018 (2) BOL, MO, NBG, PRE; 34048 (3) BOL, MO,
NBG, PRE; 34053 (3) BOL, MO, NBG, PRE; Drege s.n. (2)
BM, K, MO, NBG, PRE; Duthie 176 7 (3) BOL, PRE, STE; 1 795
(3) PRE, STE; s.n. (3) PRE.
Ecklon s.n. (2) BM, MO, NBG, PRE, US; Ecklon & Zeyher s.n.
(2) PRE; Ellis 2452 (1) PRE; 2453 (1) K, PRE; 5416 (1) PRE;
5417 (1) PRE; 5433 (3) PRE; 5434 (3) PRE; 5435 (3) PRE;
5482A (3) MO; 5503A (2) MO; Esterhuysen s.n. (3) BOL.
Parker 3745 (3) BOL, K, NBG.
Rehm 6054 (3) BM, K, PRE; Ronaasen s.n. (3) NBG.
Spies 36 78 (3) PRE; 3693 (2) PRE.
Thunberg s.n. (1) BM, K, MO, PRE.
Wolley Dod 3394 (3) BM, BOL, K, MO, PRE.
Zeyher s.n. (as Pappe s.n.) (3) BOL, NBG, PRE.
Note added in proof
Stalked, multicellular glands also occur on the back
of the lower lemma in many species of Panicum sect.
Stolonifera [Zuloaga, F.O. & Sendulsky, T. 1988. A revi-
sion of Panicum subgenus Phanopyrum section Stoloni-
fera (Poaceae: Paniceae). Annals of the Missouri Botani-
cal Garden 75: 420— 455] of tropical America. Although
the walls of the stalk are similar to those of Prionanthium,
the central depression is nearly smooth and lacks the
rectangular grid. It is probable that these Panicum glands
are secretory, but this has not yet been conclusively
demonstrated.
Bothalia 18,2: 155-163 (1988)
Studies in the genus Riccia (Marchantiales) from southern Africa. 10.
Two new white-scaled species of the group ‘Squamatae’: R.
argenteolimbata and R. albornata
O.H. VOLK*, S.M. PEROLD** and T. BORNEFELD***
Keywords: Marchantiales, new species, nothopolyploidy, Riccia, southern Africa, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
Two new white-scaled species, R. argenteolimbata and R. albornata have been isolated by one of us (Volk).
R. argenteolimbata has a compact thallus with stiff, regular scales and apolar spores, whereas R. albornata has a
somewhat more spongy structure of the thallus, large, frilly, hyaline scales and polar spores.
UITTREKSEL
Twee nuwe spesies met wit skubbe, R. argenteolimbata en R. albornata is deur een van ons (Volk), gei'soleer.
R. argenteolimbata het ’n kompakte tallus, met stywe, ewe-groot skubbe en apolere spore, terwyl R. albornata
’n ietwat meer sponserige tallus-bou, groot, gekartelde, hialiene skubbe en polere spore het.
1. Riccia argenteolimbata Volk & Per old, sp. nov.
Thallus dioicus, perennis, parvus, in vivo glaucescens-
opacus, in sicco albidus; squamis argenteis quasi limbatis,
inde nomen. From usque ad 7 mm longa, 0,7— 1 ,2(— 2,0)
mm lata, 0,6— 0,9 mm crassa, 1 — 1,5(— 2)-plo latior quam
crassa, asymmetrice furcata, lobis extremis brevibus,
obovato-ligulatis, subacutis, marginibus acutis, lateribus
costae rectis; pagina superior subplana, longe sulcata.
Squamae rigidae, dense imbricatae, semiorbiculatae, inte-
gerrimae, marginem frondis minutim superantes, calce
incrustatae, albae vel plusminusve subfuscae. Sporae
apolares, subglobosae, sine ala, 80-120(-130) pm dia-
metro, rufo-bruneae, ornamentatione reticulata, 12—15
(-16) foveolis in diametro. Chromosomatum numerus
n = 8; 9; 16; 20; 24.
TYPES.— SWA/Namibia, 2116 (Okahandja): Marien-
hof (Dunroamin) (OK 289) (— BD), alt. 1 550 m, schluff-
reicher, stark kalkhaltiger, grauer Boden der ‘Vlakte’,
zeitweise durchfeuchtet, pH 7,8, 1974.03.28, Volk
00910 (M, holo.). 2217 (Windhoek): Hatsamas (WIN
92) (-DC), alt. 1 870 m, ebene Treppenstufen im Blau-
kalk, staubiger, schluffreicher, kalkhaltiger Boden, pH
7,8, mit Oropetium capense, 1974.01.31, Volk 00 762
(M, para.).
Thallus dioicous (Figure 1 A, B), perennial, gregarious
or single and scattered, rarely in rosettes; mostly asym-
metrically bi- or trifurcate, branches medium to widely
divergent, obovate-ligulate (Figures 1A, B; 2 A), 2—7
mm long, 0,7-l,2(-2,0) mm broad, 0,6-0, 9 mm thick,
1 — 1 ,5( — 2) times broader than thick, segments short,
apex wedge-shaped (Figure 2B); sulcus conspicuous and
long (Figure 1A, B, E), its sides convex, becoming flatter
proximally (Figure 1H1-3); dorsally dull greenish grey,
* Botanische Anstalten d. Univ., Wurzburg D8700, Germany, BRD.
** Botanical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and
Water Supply, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001, RSA.
*** Am Reelein 1, Hochberg D8706, Germany, BRD.
MS. received: 1988.02.01.
not shiny, sometimes brown along the margin; margins
acute, flanks steep, dark-coloured, covered by silvery
grey scales, hence the specific epithet; ventral surface
rounded, green or reddish brown, apically with arched,
narrow, brown bands across (Figure 1G); when dry,
dorsally greyish white, margins lip-like tightly inflexed
and flanks densely covered by regularly arranged, ap-
pressed, stiff scales (Figure 1C). Anatomy of thallus :
dorsal epithelium bistratose, upper layer of cells rarely
intact, but when intact, inflated, ± 20-35 x 30-40 pm,
capped with deposits of calcium, (Figure II), soon col-
lapsed, forming so-called ‘ring’ -cells, which appear thick-
walled (Figures 1 J, centre; 2C, D), the lateral walls
double and raised; second layer of epithelial cells with-
out chloroplasts, short-rectangular, 25-37 x 22—32 gm,
upper transverse and lateral walls thicker, the latter
gradually thinning out below (Figure II); from above,
dorsal cells arranged in regular, honeycomb pattern,
air pores mostly triangular and quadrangular, small,
(Figures 1 J, 2D); assimilation tissue (chlorenchyma)
compact, about '/2 the thickness of thallus, cells rect-
angular, 40—50 x ± 32 pm, in columns of about 8—10
cells, enclosing very narrow, usually 4-sided air canals;
storage tissue almost '/2 the thickness of thallus. Rhi-
zoids 12—23 pm wide, mostly smooth. Scales generally
only marginally, sometimes entirely white, base silvery
mauve becoming dark grey-brown more proximally
(Figure IB, C, E, F, K), closely imbricate, stiff, 600—
800 x ± 500 pm, projecting about 100 pm above thallus
margin (Figure 2E, F), rounded, edge smooth, cell
surfaces heavily encrusted with calcareous deposits
(Figure 1L); in body of scale, cells 50-90 x 25—30 gm,
hexagonal or nearly isodiametric, corners angled, cell
walls appear thick; at margins cells smaller, quadrate to
brick-shaped, ± 22 x 27 pm. Antheridia with short, hya-
line necks. Archegonia with dark purple necks. Sporangia
usually single, bulging slightly dorsally, each containing
200-450 spores, rarely sporulating. Spores 80-120
(-130) gm in diameter, reddish brown to almost black,
semi-opaque to opaque; globular to subglobular, apolar,
wing and triradiate mark absent (Figure 3A, B), peri-
phery tuberculate (Figure 3D, E), ornamentation reticu-
156
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
FIGURE 1. — Riccia argenteolimbata. Morphology and anatomy. A, female thallus with two sporangia, turgid; B, male thallus
with antheridial necks, turgid; C, as B, dry, scales with dark bases; D, bulbil; E, turgid, scales white; F, same specimen as
E, dry; G, transverse bands on ventral surface; Hl-3, transverse sections from apex to base; I, part of section with de-
posits on turgid and collapsed epithelial cells, (‘ring’ cells with thickened walls); J, horizontal section at different levels:
left, top of epithelium with triangular air pores; centre, base of epithelial cells; right, chlorenchyma with four-sided air
canals; K, scale; L, calcium deposits on outer surface of scale; (A-L by Volk). A, E, G, Volk 00910 ; B, D, H3, Volk
00765\ HI, Volk 84-713; H2, 1-L, Volk 881a. Scale bars: A-H=lmm; I, J, L =50 urn; K = 100 jim.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
157
feld & Grillenberger 1987). The same degree of notho-
polyploidy, represented by two different chromosome
patterns within one species, occurs in R. argenteolim-
bata (Figure 4B, C) and in R. albolimbata (Bornefeld
unpublished). The karyotype with n = 20 (Figure 4D)
seems to have developed from the one with n = 24
(Figure 4C) by the loss of the four D, chromosomes.
The loss of a group of homologous chromosomes has
also been observed in Targionia lorbeeriam (Bornefeld
1987). Further investigations may yield still other
karyotypes of R. argenteolimbata . Because of the vari-
ability of chromosome numbers in some Riccia species,
this character does not seem to be suitable for the
definition of a species.
Chromosome numbers (Number of counts in brackets)
n = 8 : Volk 86-930 pp (3), Volk 86-934 (5), S.M.
Perold 772 (3)
n = 9 : Volk 86-930 pp (4), Volk 86-934 (3)
n = 16: S.M. Perold 727 (2)
n = 20: Volk 81-164/165 (4)
n = 24: with one A chromosome: Volk 81-164/ 165
(8), Volk 81-1 70 (2), Volk 81-1 72 (3), Volk
86-922 (2); with two A chromosomes: Volk
81-204 pp (2); Volk 00912 (5)
FIGURE 2. — Riccia argenteolim-
bata. Morphology and ana-
tomy. A, dorsal view of
dichotomous branch; B,
wedge-shaped apex and
groove; C, dorsal cells with
only a few not collapsed;
D, dorsal cells collapsed,
showing cell walls and small
pores; E, stiff scales at
thallus margin; F, more
enlarged view of marginal
dorsal cells and scales. (SEM
micrographs by Perold).
(A-F, S.M. Perold 772).
Scale bars on A-F =100
/urn.
late with 1 2 — 1 5( — 1 6) round to angular areolae across
diameter (Figure 3C, D), 3-7 Atm wide, ridges thick
(Figure 3A, F), raised at nodes into conical or truncate
processes (Figure 3E). Chromosome numbers n = 8; 9;
16; 20; 24 (Figure 4A, B, C, D).
Riccia argenteolimbata is one of eight southern Afri-
can Riccia species for which several karyotypes are
known. Four of the six karyotypes of R. argenteolim-
bata (Figure 4A-D) are given in their original arrange-
ment and sorted according to chromosome types (Borne-
feld 1984). The karyotype with n = 8 (Figure 4A) re-
presents the basic set in the genus Riccia and is common
to the majority of the species. The karyotype with n = 9
possesses one additional B> chromosome; that with n =
16 has two B, , two Cj and four Dj chromosomes. As is
evident from Figure 4B and 4C, the triploid karyotypes
of R. argenteolimbata are not achieved by threefold
multiplication of the basic set, but by differential multi-
plication of the diverse chromosome types. For this
phenomenon, which is unique to Riccia, the term ‘notho-
polyploidy’ was earlier suggested (Bornefeld 1984). The
decreasing size of homologous chromosomes does not
occur by chance; it is also found in the other genera of
the Marchantiales and becomes more noticeable as the
number of homologous chromosomes increases (Borne-
158
Riccia argenteolimbata Volk & Perold, sp. nov., dif-
fers from the other Riccia species with white scales by
being dioicous, by the compact texture of the thallus,
the closely imbricate, stiff, white or greyish white scales,
often with darker coloured bases, and by the globular
or subglobular, apolar spores.
Among the Volk specimens 881, 883 and 11906,
which Arnell (1957) identified as R. albosquamata, thalli
of R. argenteolimbata are also present; however, his de-
scription of R. albosquamata, as well as the type speci-
men Volk 452, and most definitely its triangular-globular,
polar spores, do not correspond with/?, argenteolimbata
(Perold in press). Arnell appears to have been uncertain
about the distinguishing characters of the white-scaled
species and misidentifled them several times.
R. argenteolimbata is found at altitudes of 1 000—
2 000 m above sea level, in summer rainfall areas with an
annual precipitation of at least 200 mm. It prefers a
sunny position, is calciphilous and often grows on grey-
ish turf soils with a high dust content, overlying lime-
rich beds, calcrete, crystalline limestone, or dolomite, or
on alluvium on steep river banks. These soils may be-
come periodically waterlogged for short intervals when it
rains. Soil pH values are high: of 96 samples tested, 36%
fell between 7,0 and 7,4; 39% between 7,5 and 7,9 and
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
25% above 7,9 (Volk). The species is often associated
with R. trichocarpa, R. albolimbata, R. atropurpurea,
Cyanophyceae and with crustaceous lichens. It has so
far been found only in Zambezian areas occupied by the
Sudano-Zambezian floral element (Volk 1966), in the
northern parts of SWA/Namibia and a few localities in
Botswana, north-western and south-western Transvaal,
central Orange Free State and northern Cape Province
(Figure 5). In some recent collections, e.g. Volk 85-775
and 86-930, very small plants are mixed with plants of
normal size. The difference in size seems to be genetical-
ly determined, as it persists in cultivation experiments
and the small specimens may represent a different sub-
species.
During the dry season from April onwards, R. argenteo-
limbata tends to form bulbils or turions for perennation
and dispersal (Figure ID) (Volk 1984); these are very
loosely attached to the soil, brown material accumulates
in the walls of the peripheral cells, which then form a
resistant covering, the assimilation columns shorten and
fatty oils appear in the storage tissue.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
S.W.A./NAMIBIA. — 1815 (Okahakana): Etosha, Bitter-
water (-CC), Volk. 01389 (M). 1816 (Namutoni): Olifants-
bad (-AA), Volk 81-174 (M, PRE); Etosha, Okerfontein
FIGURE 3. — Riccia argenteolim-
bata. Spores. A, ?proximal
face; B, side view; C, ?dis-
tal face; D, ?distal face,
with crowding of truncate
papillae at areolar nodes in
centre; E, more enlarged
view of areolae; F, ?distal
face. [A-E, SEM micro-
graphs; F, LM (light micro-
scope) micrograph by Pe-
rold.] (A, B, D, Volk
8 5- 7 73b-, C, E, F, Volk
84-713.) Scale bars on A-E
= 50 Mm; diameter of spore
on F, ± 100 Mm.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
159
u
cc
Cc
FIGURE 4. — Riccia argenteolim-
bata. Karyotypes. A, karyo-
type with n = 8 and chro-
mosome formula where A,
BB, CC, DD, E represent
the basic set in the genus
Riccia', B, nothotriploid
set with one A chromo-
some and U2 chromosome
(this karyotype seems to
be the most widespread
one) ex Bomefeld 1984
(by courtesy of J. Cramer
in der Gebriider Bomtrae-
ger Verlagsbuchhandlung,
Berlin-Stuttgart, FRG); C,
nothotriploid set with two
A chromosomes and lack-
ing U2 chromosome; D,
karyotype with n = 20 re-
sembles that of 2C, but the
four Dj chromosomes have
been lost (the sequence
from A to D possibly cor-
responds to an evolution-
ary line). (A-D by Borne-
feld) (A, S.M. Perold 772;
B, Volk 81-J72 p.p.; C,
Volk 81-204 p.p.; D, Volk
81-164/165.) Scale bar:
A— D = 1 /rm.
)C«
ci C2 c'2
« << «
D1 Dg
©<» jr
• i
«
O
c
D
«
I
(-DD), Volk 81-164 (M, PRE). 1915 (Okaukuejo): Etosha
between Okaukuejo and Okandehoe (-AA), E. Retief 1422a
(PRE); Etosha, Sprokieswoud (-BA), Volk 81-172 (M); Okau-
kuejo (-BB), Volk 00912, 81-204 (M). 1916 (Gobaub): Etosha,
Gemsbokvlakte (-AA), E. Retief 1493a (PRE); Smook 5118
(PRE); OU 449 (-AC), Volk 5116 (M); Halali (-BA), Smook
5138 (PRE); Elandsdraai (-CA), Volk 81-170 (M); GR 412
(-CB), Volk 00749 (M); OU 179 (-CD), Volk 00975 (M);
GR 398 (-DB), Volk 00744 (M); OU 359 (-DC), Volk 81-1 77a
(M). 1917 (Tsumeb): Otjikoto Lake (-AB), Smook 5159 (PRE);
Volk 81-156 (M, PRE); GR 45 (-DB), Volk 81-151b (M, PRE);
GR 154 (-DC), Volk 00454 (M). 1918 (Grootfontein): GR 729
(—AC), Volk 81-146 (M, PRE); Volk 84-705 (M). 2014 (Wel-
witschia): OU 419 (-BA), Volk 5137 (M). 2016 (Otjiwarongo):
OU 193 (-AA), Volk 00977 (M); OU 132 (-AA), Volk 5135
(M); Outjo Dist., 20 km W of Khorixas (- AA), Long & Rae 921
(E); OU 187 (—BA), Volk 86-860 p.p. (M); OTJ 23 (-CA),
Volk 00462 (M); OTJ 97 (-CC), Volk 84-713 (M). 2017 (Water-
berg): GR 98 (-AA), Hoffmann PRE-CH 4514 (PRE); Volk
00453, 84-692, 84-721, 85-773, 85-775, 86-930, 86-933, 86-934
(M); OTJ 147 (-CA), Volk 881 p.p., 883 p.p. (M, PRE). 2116
(Okahandja): OM 46 (-AA), Gibbs Russell & Smook 5240
(PRE); OM 37 (-AA), Volk 85-853 (M); OK 240 (-BD), Volk
00910 (M); OK 34/44 (-CA), Volk 11906 p.p. (M); OK 22
(-DA), Volk 5170 (M); OK 252 (-DA), Volk 00469 (M). 2117
(Otjosondu): OK 105 (-DB), Volk 6169 (M). 2118 (Steinhau-
sen): OK 107 (-DB), Volk 86-922 (M); OK 113 (-DB), Volk
6212a (M); GO 252 (-DB), Volk 00507 (M). 2217 (Windhoek):
Avis Dam (-CA), Volk 00752 (M); Rietfontein (-CD), \olk
81-265 p.p. (PRE); WIN 92 (-DC), Volk 00591, 00761, 00762,
00764, 00765 (M). 2316 (Nauchas): Windhoek Dist., Gamsberg
Mountains, 130 lan SW of Windhoek (-AD), Long & Rae 946
(E); WIN 46 (-BA), Volk 81-200 (M). 2317 (Rehoboth): GIB
113 (— BB), Volk 01291 (M). 2416 (Maltahohe): MAL 19
(-BB), Volk 6386, 6439, 6860 (M); MAL 91 (-BD), Volk 6856
(M); 2417 (Mariental): GIB 6 (-BA), Volk 5268 (M). 2418
(Stampriet): Gochas, Auob River (-DD), Hardy 6586a (PRE).
BOTSWANA.— 1921 (Aha Hills): Ngamiland Dist., Aha
Hills, hill on N side near E end of range' (-CC), Long & Rae 834,
160
842 (E). 2123 (Pink Pan); Central Kalahari Game Res., Decep-
tion Pan (-BD), Henderson 659 (PRE).
TRANSVAAL. — 2228 (Maasstroom): Alldays, 55 km W of,
on road to Swartwater (—DA), S.M. Perold 766, 767, 769, 772
(PRE); Gregory Halt, 19 km NW of Alldays, near bridge (-DB),
S.M. Perold 737 p.p. (PRE); opposite Bulkop Store, on calcrete
(-DC), S.M. Perold 793 p.p., 794 (PRE). 2327 (Ellisras): Farm
Franschhoek, 29 NW of Villa Nova (-BD), Smook 4231 (PRE).
2329 (Petersburg): Vivo, 15 km N of (-AB), S.M. Perold 727,
728 (PRE). 2428 (Nylstroom): between Groenvallei and Roed-
tan, Farm Zoetkoppies (-BB), S.M. Perold 339 p.p. (PRE). 2725
(Bloemhof): Farm Leeufontein, 10 km W of Wolmaransstad
(-BB), A.E. van Wyk 5753 p.p. (PRE).
O.F.S. — 2825 (Boshof): Farm Goede Hoop (-CA), Volk
81-204 p.p., 81-210 p.p. (M, PRE). 2827 (Senekal): 5 km S of
turnoff to Willem Pretorius Wildtuin (-AC), S.M. Perold 957
(PRE). 2926 (Bloemfontein): nr Eagle’s Nest, Bloemfontein
(-AA), Potts 7003B-E (BLFU).
CAPE. — 2922 (Prieska): Farm Erfrust, N bank of Orange
River, between Prieska and Koegasbrug (-BC), Smook 4487
(PRE).
FIGURE 5. — Distribution map of R. argenteolimbata, ■; and
R. albomata, 0, in southern Africa.
2. Riccia albomata Volk & Perold, sp. nov.
Thallus monoicus, mediocris, viridis; in sicco albidus,
nitidus. From usque ad 12 mm longa, 1,5— 2,0(-4,0)
mm lata, 1,0— 2,0 mm crassa, triplo latior quam crassa,
bi- vel trifurcata; lobis terminalibus brevibus, valde di-
vergentibus, late ligulatis, apice rotundato emarginato, in
partibus junioribus profunde acuteque sulcatis; cellulae
dorsales epithelii grandes, ad 60 pm diametro, saepe duas
columnas chlorophylloferas obtegentes; chlorenchyma
dimidio crassitudinis thalli, canalae aeriferae ad 80 /urn
latae ab 6 columnis chlorophyllosis circumcinctae; costa
subplana, lateribus oblique in margines acutes excurren-
tibus, viridibus vel purpureis. Squamae magnae, crispatae,
calce incrustatae, vel hyalinae, marginem frondis exce-
dentes, dense imbricatae, basi saepe coloratae. Sporae
polares, ± 100 pm diametro, alatae, ± irregulariter reti-
culatae, foveolis 2,5 pm latis, saepe imperfectis. Ricciae
albolimbatae similis, sed ornamentatione sporarum et
conformatione epithelii et chlorenchymatis differt.
Chromosomatum numerus n = 15.
TYPE. — Cape Province, 2921 (Kenhardt): ± 10 km
westl. Kenhardt, an der Strasse nach Kakamas (—AC),
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
alt. 970 m, grobsandiger, schluffreicher, rotbrauner Gra-
nitzersatz am Fuss von Batholithen, pH 7,1, mitR. oka-
handjana S. Amell undMoosen, 1981.01.15, Volk 81-081
(M, holo.).
Thallus monoicous (Figures 6A, 7B), perennial, in
crowded gregarious patches, not in rosettes; branches sim-
ple or bi- to trifurcate, symmetric or asymmetric, usually
widely divergent, oblong, (4— )5—9(— 12) mm long, 1,5—
2,0(-4,0) mm broad, 1,0— 2,0 mm thick, 1,2— 2,5 or
more times broader than thick; apex rounded, obtuse,
emarginate, sulcus deep apically (Figures 6A; 7A, B, C),
gradually becoming shallow and wide, flattening out
proximally (Figure 6B1— 4); dorsally green, shiny, older
surfaces and edges yellowish or whitish green; margins
acute, slightly attenuate, flanks sloping obliquely outward,
violet or green; ventral surface flat to rounded, green;
when dry, greyish white and margins inflexed with large,
frilly, hyaline or lime-encrusted, white scales covering
most of dorsal surface.
Anatomy of thallus : dorsal epithelial cells globose or
mammillate (Figures 6C; 7C, D), 30-40(-50) x 40-60
pm, often spanning two columns of assimilation cells be-
neath (Figure 6C, D, centre), surface occasionally lightly
dusted with fine calcium carbonate deposits (Figure 7F),
towards margins and in older parts cells frequently col-
lapsed (Figure 7E); air pores narrowly rectangular or
wider near the margins and 5 or 6-sided, positioned over
wide, mostly 6-sided air canals, up to 80 pm wide (Figure
6D); assimilation tissue (chlorenchyma) about V2 the
thickness of thallus, cells short-rectangular, 40—50 x ±
30 pm wide, in columns of 6— 8(— 10) cells; storage tissue
about \ the thickness of thallus, cells ± 50 jum wide.
Rhizoids mostly smooth, some tuberculate, ± 20 pm
wide. Scales imbricate, rounded, margin smooth, project-
ing ± 50—100 pm above margin of thallus, those at apex
hyaline, more proximal ones white, sometimes with red-
dish purple bases, large, up to 1 250 x 750 pm, cells oc-
casionally lime-encrusted, walls thick, 4— 6-sided, 75—85
(—100) x 35—50 pm in body of scale; brick-shaped, ±
35 x 60 pm wide (Figure 6E) in margin. Antheridia with
prominent hyaline necks projecting along midline. Arche-
gonia with purple necks scattered singly along either side
of midline. Sporangia containing ±300 spores each, cover-
ing tissue with large pores, disintegrating when ripe and
leaving capsules exposed in hollow. Spores large, (85—)
95— 105(— 115) pm in diameter, straw-coloured or yel-
low to brown, semi-transparent to opaque; triangular-
globular, polar, with wing up to 5 pm wide (Figure 8A,
B), notched or perforated at angles, margin finely crenu-
late, distal face ± reticulate with 14 — 16(— 20) small, deep
areolae across the diameter, about 2,5 pm wide (Figure
8C, D, F); areolar walls ± 2,5 pm thick, raised into pro-
cesses at the nodes (Figure 8E) and frequently anasto-
mosing to form short convoluted ridges (Figure 8C, D);
proximal face with triradiate mark distinct, about 30— 40
small areolae on each of 3 facets (Figure 8A). Chromo-
some number n = 1 5 (Figure 6F).
This unusual haploid set with 1 5 chromosomes (Figure
6F) is known only in R. albomata ( Volk 81-081 — 15
counts); Volk 84-667 p.p. — 4 counts). The chromo-
some formula of this set contains, in addition to the basic
set, 2B, , 2C| and 3D, chromosomes.
Vegetatively R. albomata is not easily distinguished
from R. albolimbata, but it never grows in rosettes, the
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
161
FIGURE 6. — Riccia albomata. Morphology and anatomy. A, fresh thalli with sporangia, archegonial and antheridial necks; Bl— 4,
transverse sections of branch at different distances from apex to proximal part; C, enlargement of transverse section through
dorsal epithelium (showing wide cells) and through assimilation tissue; D, horizontal section at different levels: left, air
pores and epithelial cells; in centre, position of air pores over air canals with epithelial cells extending over columns of
chlorenchyma; right, chlorenchyma with air canals; E, scale; F, chromosomes. (A-E by Volk; F by Bomefeld) (A-D, F,
Volk 81-081; E, Volk 84-667). Scale bars: A, B = 1 mm; C, D =50 |um; E =100 um; F = 1 Mm.
162
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
FIGURE 7. — Riccia albomata.
Morphology and anatomy.
A, dorsal view of apex and
groove with partly inflexed
margins and large scales; B,
archegonial and antheridial
necks; C, dorsal cells in
groove; D, more enlarged
view of dorsal cells at
groove; E, dorsal cells and
air pores toward margin;
F, dorsal cells with deposits
(SEM micrographs by Pe-
rold). (A, B, E, F, Oliver
8854a; C, D, Morley
CH4525.) Scale bars on
A— F = 100 Mm.
hyaline scales are larger and frillier, the dorsal epithelial
cells are also larger, the air canals wider and generally en-
closed by six columns of cells and the spore ornamentation
is markedly different with numerous small, irregular
areolae and convoluted ridges on both faces. The distri-
bution areas of the two species do not appear to overlap
either, except for two localities in the central Cape.
R. argenteolimbata is generally a smaller plant, with
regular, stiff white scales, a mat, glaucous grey dorsal
surface and apolar spores; it is also dioicous.
R. albomata is a rare endemic species infrequently
collected at altitudes of 500—1 500 m above sea level. It
appears to be confined to those regions of the Cape Pro-
vince (Figure 5) which are influenced by, or generally
receive sparse winter rains of at least 125 mm per annum.
Generally it grows on reddish brown or light brown,
coarse, gravelly soil, derived from granite or quartzite,
on koppies or on slopes, in full sun or in light shade of
small shrubs or thorn trees. The soil pH values are 7,0—
8,0 (Volk). It is sometimes associated with other Riccia
spp., e.g. R. okahandjana S. Arnell and with mosses, e.g.
Desmatodon convolutus (Brid.) Grout and Funaria spp.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
CAPE. — 2820 (Kakamas): Aughrabies Nat. Park, Oranje-
kom (-CB), Volk 84-667 (M, PRE). 2917 (Hondeklipbaai):
36 km S of Springbok, on road to Kamieskroon (-DD), S.M.
Perold 1445 (PRE). 2921 (Kenhardt): 10 km W of Kenhardt
(-AC), Volk 81-081 (M, PRE). 3119 (Calvinia): E of Slagberg,
midway between Nieuwoudtville and Loeriesfontein, Farm
Koringhuis (-AB), S.M. Perold 1800, 1801 (PRE); NE of
Nieuwoudtville, Groothoek, on Soetlandsrivier (-AD), Oliver
8854a (PRE). 3123 (Victoria West): Farm Rietpoort, 34 km N
of Victoria West, on slope (-AA), Smook 6961 (PRE); Farm
Kalkfontein, 48 km NE of Victoria West, on flat gravel plain
(-AA), Smook 6990 (PRE). 3125 (Steynsburg): White Ridge
(-AC), Duthie 5149 (BOL). 3218 (Clanwilliam): Bidouw, Farm
Mertenhof (-BB), Oliver 1463 (BOL). 3222 (Beaufort West):
Beaufort West, on small koppie (-BC), Steyn 5487 (BOL). 3319
(Worcester): Rabiesberg, Farm Doringkloof (-DA), Morley
CH4525 (PRE); Nuy (-DA), Morley 362 (PRE). 3420 (Bredas-
dorp): De Hoop, in pass on road from Wydgelee to De Hoop
(-AD), Fellingham 746a (PRE).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Sincere thanks are due to the Curators of Botanische
Staatssammlung, Munchen and Bolus Herbarium, Uni-
versity of Cape Town, for the loan of specimens and to
the many people who kindly collected specimens for us,
especially Botanical Research Institute staff members,
Dr G.E. Gibbs Russell, Messrs D. Hardy, E.G.H. Oliver,
Mrs L. Fish (nee Smook), Misses E. Retief, L. Hender-
son and M. Morley as well as to the Hoffmann family,
Farm Oros, SWA/Namibia.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
163
FIGURE 8. — Riccia albomata.
Spores. A, proximal face;
B, side view of proximal
face; C, D, F, distal face;
E, more enlarged view of
areolae near margin on
distal side. (A-E, SEM
micrographs; F, LM (light
microscope) micrograph by
Perold.) (A-D , Oliver 5149;
E, F, Volk 84-667 .) Scale
bars on A-E =50 /am; dia-
meter of spore on F, ± 100
/am.
REFERENCES
ARNELL, S. 1957. Hepaticae collected in South West Africa
by Prof. Dr O.H. Volk. Mitteilungen ms der botanischen
Staatssammlung, Miinchen 16: 262-272.
ARNELL, S. 1963 Hepaticae of South Africa, pp. 411. Swedish
National Scientific Research Council, Stockholm.
BORNEFELD, T. 1984. Chromosomenanalyse der Gattung Ric-
cia von SUd- und SW-Afrika und allgemeine Bemerkungen
zur Zytogenetik der Lebermoose. Nova Hedwigia 40:
313-328.
BORNEFELD, T. 1987. The natural system of the Marchantiales
based upon cytogenetical and morphological evidence.
Nova Hedwigia 45 : 41-52.
BORNEFELD, T. & GRILLENBERGER, Chr. 1987. Some as-
pects of size in chromosome analysis of liverworts (Mar-
chantiales). Nova Hedwigia 44: 91-100.
PEROLD, S.M. in press. Studies in the genus Riccia (Marchantiales)
from southern Africa. 12. Riccia albolimbata and the
status of R. albosquamata. Bothalia.
VOLK, O.H. 1966. Die Florengebiete von Siidwestafrika. Journal
SWA Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft Windhoek 20: 25-58.
VOLK, O.H. 1983. Vorschlag fur eine Neugliederung der Gattung
Riccia L. Mitteilungen ms der botanischen Staatssamm-
lung, Miinchen 19: 453—465.
VOLK, O.H. 1984. Pflanzenvergesellschaftungen mit Riccia- Allan
in Siidwestafrika (Namibia). Vegetatio 55: 57-64.
VOLK, O.H. 1984. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Marchantiales in
Siidwestafrika (Namibia). Nova Hedwigia 39: 117-143.
Bothalia 18,2 : 165-171 (1988)
Taxonomy and leaf anatomy of the genus Ehrharta (Poaceae) in
southern Africa: the Dura group
G.E. GIBBS RUSSELL* and R.P. ELLIS*
Keywords: Capensis, Ehrharta, leaf anatomy, Mountain Fynbos, Poaceae, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
The Dura species group in the genus Ehrharta Thunb. is differentiated morphologically by the perennial habit
and the very large, awned, subglabrous spikelets and anatomically by the occurrence of tanniniferous cells and
wax platelets obscuring the stomatal pores. The Dura group consists of two species, E. dura Nees ex Trim and E.
microlaena Nees ex Trim, which occur only in Mountain Fynbos. The group shows no clear morphological or
anatomical relationship with other species groups in the genus in southern Africa.
UITTREKSEL
Die Dura-spesiegroep in die genus Ehrharta Thunb. word morfologies deur die meerjarige groeiwyse en die
besonder groot, genaalde, ylbehaarde blompakkies onderskei en anatomies deur die aanwesigheid van tannien-
selle en wasplaatjies wat die huidmondjieporiee verberg. Die Dura-groep bestaan uit twee spesies, E. dura Nees
ex Trim en E. microlaena Nees ex Trim, wat slegs in Bergfynbos voorkom. Die groep vertoon geen duidelike mor-
fologiese of anatomiese verwantskap met ander spesiegroepe in die genus in suidelike Afrika nie.
INTRODUCTION
Previous papers in this series have outlined the seven
provisional species groups for Ehrharta in southern Afri-
ca, and dealt with the Setacea and Villosa groups (Gibbs
Russell & Ellis 1987; Ellis 1987a, 1987b; Gibbs Russell
1987a, 1987b). The Dura group is a small, apparently
isolated group composed of only two species, E. dura
Nees ex Trin. and E. microlaena Nees ex Trim The two
species are distinguished morphologically from other
Ehrharta species by correlation of perennial habit, large
spikelets 9—17 mm long and awned sterile lemmas with
glabrous sides, keel and margins. The spikelet plan of the
Dura group is shown in Figure 1 . Anatomically the Dura
group is distinguished within Ehrharta by the presence
of tanniniferous cells and by wax platelets obscuring the
stomatal pores. The spikelets and leaves of the species
have a characteristic olive-green colour that is distinctive
and may result from the dark tannins in the intercostal
long cells of the epidermis. The species differ from each
other principally in awn length and in leaf blade shape
and width. Both species occur only in Mountain Fynbos.
The two species in the group present no nomenclatural
difficulties because they were described by Trinius (1839)
in the same publication, and other authors have consis-
tently followed this treatment (Nees 1841; Steudel
1853; Stapf 1900; Chippindall 1955); thus neither
species has synonyms. The same treatment is followed
here. This singularly simple situation is undoubtedly a
reflection of the distinctness of the Dura group within
Ehrharta and the unusually low degree of intraspecific
variation present. It is more difficult to assess to what
degree the simplicity of treatment also results from the
infrequent collection of the species due to their restrict-
* Botanical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and
Water Supply, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001.
MS. received: 1987.12.02.
ed and specialized distribution and habitat and the fact
that they are apparent in vegetation only after fire.
However, lectotypification of the names is necessary.
Trinius (1839) published descriptions of both species in
his treatment of the tribe Phalarideae without citing any
specimens. However, Trinius ascribed both names to
Nees, presumably because he had obtained specimens
from Nees with manuscript names. Two years later, Nees
(1841) also published descriptions, for which he claimed
authorship, in his treatment of all southern African gras-
ses. Specimens of both species clearly labelled in Nees’
handwriting exist in several herbaria. The Drege specimen
of each species in the Herbarium, Komarov Botanical
Institute, Leningrad (LE) is designated as lectotype, be-
cause these specimens were seen by Trinius who first
published a description.
Two previous studies, Engelbrecht (1956) and Tateoka
(1963), have covered some aspects of leaf anatomy of
this group, and their findings are in accord with the de-
tailed results presented here.
FIGURE 1. — Spikelet of E. dura ( Ellis 5457, PRE): a,
whole spikelet; b, glumes; c, first sterile lemma;
d, lemma of fertile floret; e, palea of fertile floret;
f, second sterile lemma; all X 2.
166
METHODS
Methods adopted for previous papers in this series
were followed here, both for the taxonomic and the
anatomical studies. The descriptions and keys were pre-
pared through the DELTA computer system for handling
descriptive data (Dallwitz 1984).
TAXONOMY
Key to species
Leaves with blades expanded, 4-10 mm across, lanceolate;
basal sheaths persistent, hard, reddish brown; awns
2-16 mm long E. dura
Leaves with blades reduced, setaceous, to 1 mm across;
basal sheaths eventually deciduous, membranous,
light brown or whitish; awns 13-25 mm long . . .
E. microlaena
1. Ehrharta dura Nees ex Trin. in Phalaridea, Me-
moires de l’Academie imperial des Sciences de St-Peters-
burg, ser. 6, 5: 13 (of reprint) (1839); Nees: 218(1841);
Steudel: 5 (1853); Stapf: 665 (1900); Chippindall: 37
(1955); Smook & Gibbs Russell: 55 (1985). Type:
Drege, Du Toit’s Kloof, 3 000 ft, (LE!, lecto., here de-
signated; K!,P!).
Perennial, erect, forming large leafy tufts, rarely long-
rhizomatous. Rhizomes woody, with glabrous, thickened
cataphylls. Culms several to many, to 800 mm long, 4
mm across, herbaceous, crowded, unbranched, hollow.
Young shoots intravaginal. Leaves mostly basal, culm
leaves with blades well developed, sheaths not overlap-
ping; leaves auriculate, auricles produced from top of
sheath; basal sheaths flabellate and slightly twisted,
tight, persistent, hard, reddish brown, bearing blades;
ligule a membrane fringed with hairs or sometimes near-
ly glabrous, 1, 5-3,0 mm long; leaf blades persistent,
erect, herbaceous, glabrous, lanceolate, 4—10 mm across,
flat or folded, becoming rolled from margins when
dry; blade bases folded, thickening with age, persistent
and conspicuous often even in burned plants; blade tips
gradually tapering. Inflorescence a panicle, open, 70—200
mm long, considerably overtopping leaves; main axis
straight, often closely subtended or enveloped below by
uppermost leaf sheath; numerous spikelets, spikelets
appressed to the axes and held nearly erect but somewhat
secund. Spikelets pedicellate, distinctly compressed
laterally, 9—16 mm long, 3 mm across laterally (above
glumes), olive-green. Rhachilla prolonged beyond
fertile floret. Glumes not keeled, the lower V2 or more
the length of the upper, V4-V2 as long as spikelet, white,
or green, appressed to lemmas at maturity. Lower glume
2,5— 6,5 mm long, 3— 5-nerved, acute. Upper glume 3,5—
7,0 mm long, 5— 9-nerved, truncate apically. Florets
with lemmas decidedly firmer than the glumes, keeled.
Sterile lemmas laterally compressed, sides flat, similar in
shape, texture and ornamentation; with keel and margins
parallel; base not stipitate, without auriculate appendages,
shortly bearded, sides scabrous or sometimes with short
hairs, dull, with 3—1 1 strong or fairly distinct longitudi-
nal ribs; tip tapering gradually from body of lemma to
an arista or awn. Awn 2—16 mm long. First sterile lem-
ma about V2 to z/3 length of second sterile lemma. Fer-
tile floret shorter than second sterile lemma. Lemma of
fertile floret differing from sterile lemmas, strongly
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
laterally compressed and sides unomamented, faintly
3— 5-nerved, sides glabrous, tip truncate with a tuft of
minute hairs. Palea thinner than lemma, 3/4 or more as
long as lemma, keeled, 1-nerved. Lodicules 2, membra-
nous, 2-lobed, margins ciliate. Stamens 4 or 6. Anthers
7 mm long, yellow. Ovary glabrous. Stigmas white.
Caryopsis 9 mm long, laterally flattened.
E. dura is distinguished from southern African Ehr-
harta species in other groups by the perennial habit and
the large nearly glabrous mucronate to awned spikelets.
It is distinguished from closely related E. microlaena by
the broad leaves and the broad, brown, flabellate bases.
It grows in mesophytic to seasonally moist open habitats
in Mountain Fynbos in sandy or loam soils over sand-
stone or granite at altitudes of 430 to 1 300 m. A single
specimen ( Boucher 2028) came from an altitude of 30
m at Kogelberg State Forest. All but a few of the speci-
mens seen were collected after a bum. E. dura extends
along mountain ranges from Stellenbosch and Worcester
to Humansdorp (Figure 2), and has a much wider distri-
bution than E. microlaena. Most Ehrharta species show
considerable variation in habit and leaf development,
and it is possible to recognize ecotypes and local variants.
In contrast to this common pattern, E. dura is remark-
ably constant in its appearance from the eastern to the
western ends of its range, with no geographically corre-
lated infraspecific variation. Flowering occurs from
September to December.
Vouchers: Acocks 22817; Bond 1611; Taylor 4211, 10256;
Zeyher 4513.
2. Ehrharta microlaena Afees ex Trin. in Phalaridea,
Memoires de l’Academie imperial des Sciences de St-
Petersbourg, ser. 6, 5: 13 (of reprint) (1939); Nees: 218
(1841); Steudel: 5 (1853); Stapf: 665 (1900); Chip-
pindall: 37 (1955); Smook & Gibbs Russell: 55 (1985).
Type: Drege, Du Toits’ Kloof (LE!, lecto., here designa-
ted; K!, SAM!).
Perennial, erect, tufted, apparently lacking long rhi-
zomes. Culms several, to 1 100 mm long, 2,5 mm across,
herbaceous, crowded, unbranched, hollow. Young shoots
intravaginal. Leaves mostly basal, culm leaves with blades
reduced, sheaths not overlapping. Leaves auriculate, the
auricles produced from the base of the blade and adnate
to the margins of the ligule. Basal sheaths somewhat
flabellate, tight, eventually deciduous, membranous,
light brown, or whitish, bearing blades. Ligule a glabrous
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
membrane to 8 mm long. Leaf blades persistent, erect,
curved slightly outward from middle, herbaceous,
glabrous, linear, reduced, setaceous, to 1 mm across;
blade tips gradually tapering. Inflorescence a panicle,
open, or somewhat contracted, 6—18 mm long, con-
siderably overtopping leaves; main axis straight, usually
exserted from uppermost leaf sheath; of numerous
spikelets, spikelets spreading and somewhat secund.
Spikelets pedicellate, distinctly compressed laterally,
13—15 mm long, to 2,5 mm across laterally (above
glumes), with conventional internode spacing. Rachilla
prolonged beyond fertile floret. Glumes not keeled,
the lower V2 or more the length of the upper, V4-V3 as
long as spikelet, green, appressed to lemmas at maturity.
Lower glume 2,5— 3,0 mm long, 3-nerved, acute. Upper
glume 4—5 mm long, 7-nerved, truncate apically. Florets
with lemmas decidedly firmer than the glumes, keeled.
Sterile lemmas laterally compressed, sides flat, similar
in shape, texture and ornamentation; with keel and
margins parallel; base not stipitate, without auriculate
appendages, sparsely and shortly bearded at base; sides
glabrous or puberulous, dull, with 5—7 longitudinal ribs;
tip tapering gradually from body of lemma into a long
awn. Awn as long as or longer than body of lemma, 13—
25 mm long. First sterile lemma about \ length of
second sterile lemma. Fertile floret shorter than second
sterile lemma. Lemma of fertile floret differing from
sterile lemmas, strongly laterally compressed and sides
unornamented, obscurely 5— 7-nerved, sides glabrous,
tip truncate with a tuft of minute hairs. Palea thinner
than lemma, 1 * 3/4 or more as long as lemma, keeled, 1-
nerved. Lodicules 2, membranous, 2-lobed, margins
ciliate and laciniate. Stamens 4. Anthers 7 mm long,
yellow. Ovary glabrous. Stigmas white. Caryopsis 8 mm
long, laterally flattened.
E. microlaena is easily distinguished from all other
Ehrharta species by the perennial habit, the large, glabrous,
long-awned spikelets and the setaceous leaf blades. It is
hydrophytic, and grows on streamsides and in damp peaty
places in Mountain Fynbos. Like E. dura , most of the
specimens seen were collected after fire. However, the
distribution of E. microlaena is more restricted than that
of E. dura, extending from the Kogelberg Forest Reserve
north through Paarl, Bain’s Kloof, Du Toit’s Kltiof and
Ceres to Tulbagh (Figure 3) at altitudes of 400 to 1 330
m. There is little intraspecific variation, and specimens
from throughout the range are similar in appearance.
Flowering occurs from December to February.
Vouchers: Adamson 3603; Boucher 173, 1838; Esterhuy sen
28427, 35600.
1. LEAF ANATOMY OF E. DURA
Transverse section
The leaf blade is open and expanded (Figure 4A) but
has the ability to inroll from the margins under adverse
moisture conditions. The midrib is not structurally dis-
tinguishable from the lateral first order vascular bundles
and is not associated with colourless parenchyma. Suc-
cessive first order bundles are separated by three smaller
bundles, usually two third order bundles with a single
second order bundle between them (Figure 4A) although
this pattern is not always consistent (Figure 4B).
167
Well developed, rounded to slightly flattened adaxial
ribs are located over all the vascular bundles (Figure 4A—
C). These ribs generally are all the same size but the
smallest third order bundles may be associated with
smaller ribs (Figure 4B). The furrows between adjacent
ribs are deep, narrow and steep-sided and tend to become
cleft-like with leaf inrolling. Conspicuous bulliform cells
occur at the bottom of these furrows (Figure 4C).
The mesophyll tissue is irregularly arranged. The chlo-
renchyma cells are larger than the bundle sheath cells,
angular and fitting tightly together with the chloroplasts
concentrated around the cell circumference (Figure 4C).
The walls are straight with no arm cell-like invaginations.
No large intercellular air spaces are visible. Colourless
parenchyma is absent between the bundles although
colourless adaxial bundle sheath extensions are associated
with the smaller bundles (Figure 4B, C). The vascular
bundles are surrounded by two bundle sheaths, an outer
sheath of many (up to 26) small colourless cells and a
distinct mestome sheath of cells with uniformly thicken-
ed secondary walls (Figure 4C). All the epidermal cells
contain conspicuous, dark, resin-like deposits distributed
evenly across the entire width of the blade (Figure 4B,
C).
Abaxial epidermis
Costal and intercostal zones are differentiated (Figure
4D, E). The intercostal long cells are rectangular with
slightly wavy anticlinal walls (Figure 4D, E) and inflated
outer walls (Figure 5A— C). All contain black tanninife-
rous deposits generally filling the entire cell lumen (Figure
4E). Adjacent long cells in a file are separated by single
or paired short cells (Figure 4D, E). Cell size and arrange-
ment is uniform across each intercostal zone.
Stomata occur in a single file on either side of each
intercostal zone, immediately adjacent to the costal
zones (Figure 4E). Successive stomata are separated by
single interstomatals and neither the subsidiary cells
nor the interstomatals contain tanniniferous deposits.
The subsidiary cells are low dome-shaped and not sunken
below the general level of the epidermis (Figure 5C, D).
The stomatal pores are obscured by dense accumulations
of wax platelets (Figure 5D).
The costal silica bodies are irregularly dumbbell-shaped
and alternate with similarly shaped short cells. Small
prickle-hairs with very short barbs are interspaced at
168
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
FIGURE 4. — Leaf anatomy of Ehrharta dura. A-C, leaf in transverse section, Ellis 4695: A, outline showing absence of keel,
scale = 20 jum; B, prominent adaxial ribs and deep furrows, scale = 10 (im; C, detail of chlorenchyma and tanniniferous
epidermal cells (t), scale = 5 jum. D-E, abaxial epidermis: D, Ellis 4695, epidermal zonation and tanniniferous intercostal
long cells (t), scale = 10 Atm; E, Ellis 4696, all intercostal long cells with tanniniferous deposits (t), scale = 10 Atm.
intervals along the costal zones (Figures 4D, E). Micro-
hairs were not observed with the light microscope but
are clearly visible with the SEM (Figure 5C, E). These
hairs have a short basal cell with a blunt distal cell
(Figure 5E). Small pointed, single-celled intercostal
macrohairs are very rare (Figure 5F).
Specimens examined
CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): Stellenbosch (-DD), Taylor
10256. 3320 (Montagu): Grootvadersbos (-DD), Ellis 5554.
3321 (Ladismith): Cloetes Pass, Langeberge (-DD), Ellis 4695,
4696. 3322 (Oudtshoorn): Robinson Pass, Outeniqua Mts
(-CC), Ellis 5457. 3324 (Steytlerville): Groot Winterhoek Mts,
Cockscomb Peak (-DB), Ellis 5615. 3419 (Caledon): Rivier-
sonderend Mts, Die Galg (—BA), Ellis 5568.
2. LEAF ANATOMY OF E. MICROLAENA
Transverse section
No fresh leaf blade material of this taxon was avail-
able for anatomical study, and consequently the transec-
tional anatomy was not examined. Engelbrecht (1956)
has shown that the leaf blade is cylindrical in section
with the interior containing colourless parenchyma tissue.
This structure appears to result from the fusion of the
two margins and not from a reduction of the lamina on
either side of the midrib with the resultant blade being
only a rounded keel. This specialized blade needs detailed
anatomical study as it represents an interesting adaptation
within the genus.
Abaxial epidermis
Herbarium leaf blade material was used to prepare
abaxial epidermal scrapes of this species. The epidermal
structure is very similar to that of E. dura, and reference
should be made to the description above. Both species
have the diagnostic tanniniferous intercostal long cells
which dominate the epidermis and are unique to this
species group in Ehrharta.
Specimens examined
CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): Hex River Mts, Milner Peak
(-AD), Ellis 5524\ Du Toit’s Kloof (-CA), Boucher 1838.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
The two species in the Dura group are the only awned
perennial Ehrharta species in southern Africa. Three
other species have awns, but all are annual: E. longiflora
and E. triandra in the Erecta group and E. pusilla in the
closely related Calycina group. These three species grow
near ephemeral water bodies, and each is apparently
most closely related to the unawned perennial species
within their group. Awns are therefore probably the
result of parallel or convergent evolution in different
species groups. Therefore, no phylogenetic relationship
between the Dura group and the annual awned members
of the Erecta and Calycina groups should be inferred on
the basis of awn occurrence.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
169
The spikelet size of the Dura group species, excluding
the awns, is only equalled in the three taxa of the Villosa
group: E. thunbergii, E. villosa var. villosa and E. villosa
var. maxima (Gibbs Russell 1987b). However, the shape
and vesture of the sterile lemmas differ and are distinc-
tive for both groups, and size alone is poor evidence upon
which to speculate relationship.
The spikelets of the Dura group are distinctive in
other respects as well, and therefore the Dura group
cannot be shown to have a close similarity with any
other species group on the basis of spikelet structure
(Gibbs Russell & Ellis 1987). However, the consistent
occurrence of four stamens in E. microlaena and four or
six stamens (the usual number for southern African
Ehrharta species) in E. dura, suggests that relationships
for the Dura group might be sought within the Austra-
lian species formerly assigned to Tetrarrhena (Willemse
1982). Tetrarrhena is characterized by the presence of
four stamens, a most unusual condition in the Poaceae.
The Dura species group has distinctive leaf anatomy
that separates it from the other groups in the genus in
southern Africa (Gibbs Russell & Ellis 1987). In transec-
tion the leaf blade lacks a keel, has well developed, flat-
tened adaxial ribs and furrows and the mesophyll consists
of large angular chlorenchyma cells with no definite pat-
tern of arrangement. The tanniniferous epidermal cells,
particularly the bulliform cells, are diagnostic for this
group. This anatomy superficially resembles the Villosa
group but the two groups can be separated by the flat
ribs and tanniniferous cells of the Dura group and the
FIGURE 5. — Ultrastructure of the abaxial epidermis of E. dura. A, Ellis 4695 with inflated, thick-walled intercostal long cells,
stomatal file and costal zone with row of prickles, X 200; B, Ellis 4696 showing intercostal long cells, stomata and a prickle,
X 100; C-E, Ellis 4695: C, more intercostal long cell detail with microhairs and stomata visible, X 150; D, stoma with
dense accumulation of wax platelets overlying the pore, X 500; E, microhair with short basal cell and longer blunt distal
cell, X 500; F, Ellis 4696 showing small intercostal macrohair, X 500.
170
tendency towards semi-radiate chlorenchyma with
abaxial palisade-like cells in the Villosa group (Ellis
1987). The Setacea (Ellis 1987) and Ramosa groups and
the Longifolia subgroup all lack keels but differ from the
Dura group in many other respects (Gibbs Russell &
Ellis 1987).
The abaxial epidermis is differentiated into costal and
intercostal zones with rectangular long cells, low dome-
shaped subsidiary cells, irregularly dumbbell-shaped
silica bodies, prickles with short barbs and microhairs
with blunt distal cells. Epicuticular wax is absent except
in association with the stomatal apertures where wax
platelets obscure the pores. This combination of epider-
mal attributes is distinctive and serves to distinguish the
Dura group from the others (Gibbs Russell & Ellis 1987).
Rectangular long cells are shared with the Villosa and
Ramosa groups but the stomata, silica bodies and micro-
hairs differ between these three groups.
The unique tanniniferous epidermal cells found in the
species of the Dura group are of great interest because
these represent the only known C3 grasses which possess
this type of cell (Ellis in prep.). No bambusoids, pooids
or other arundinoids are known to have this type of
epidermal cell which is also rare in the chloridoids and
panicoids, except the Andropogoneae and Arundinelleae,
where many species and genera exhibit tanniniferous
cells. The colour and texture of the contents of the
epidermal cells of E. dura and E. microlaena are con-
sistent with that of the tanniniferous cells observed in
these C4 grass taxa and it is presumed that they contain
the same chemical substance. All 90 South African grass
species in which this type of cell has been observed are
unpalatable species from oligotrophic soils and it is in-
ferred that these cellular contents are polyphenols which
function as a chemical defence against herbivores (Ellis
in prep.). Their presence in the Dura group may repre-
sent a separate and similar adaptation to which no phy-
logenetic importance should be attached.
The anatomical observations of this study generally
agree with previous reports but for a minor exception.
Tateoka (1963) described the subsidiary cells of if. dura
as being almost parallel-sided, whereas here they are
shown to be low dome-shaped. However, the distinction
between these two stomatal types is only slight and a
difference in interpretation may have resulted in this
apparent inconsistency. The work of Engelbrecht (1956)
is in full agreement with this study.
It is of interest that in one of the five specimens of
E. dura examined by Engelbrecht (1956) a distinct keel,
incorporating five vascular bundles with extensive adaxial
parenchyma, was observed. This appears to be an inter-
mediate condition between E. dura and the cylindrical
blade of E. microlaena. It appears as if the cylindrical
leaf blade of E. microlaena represents an adaptation to
hygrophilous habitats and the intermediate specimen
probably came from a damp locality. Unfortunately it
is not possible to deduce which specimen displayed this
anatomy from the work of Engelbrecht (1956). Never-
theless, this represents the first possible intermediate
between these two species which are otherwise so
clearly separated anatomically and morphologically.
E. dura and E. microlaena are undoubtedly closely
related to each other, yet have very little in comrpon
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
with any other species of Ehrharta in southern Africa.
Both spikelet morphology and leaf anatomy indicate
that they occupy an isolated position within the genus
and are not linked to any of the other species groups.
The two taxa are treated at the level of species because
they are differentiated by both vegetative and spikelet
characteristics, have very different transectional leaf
blade anatomy and their habitats are somewhat different.
In addition, although the two taxa occur sympatrically,
they flower at different times and no morphologically
intermediate specimens have been observed.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank the Directors of the Herbaria that have lent
specimens previously: BOL, J, JF, K, NBG, SAM, STE,
and in addition, P and LE, as well as the Director of B
for providing visitors’ facilities for study of a number of
grass genera. We thank G. Condy for the spikelet drawing,
S.Perold for scanning electron microscopy, A. Romanow-
ski for photography, H.Ebertsohn for technical assistance
and W. Roux for technical assistance and map preparation.
REFERENCES
CHIPPINDALL, L. 1955. A guide to the identification of grasses
in South Africa. In C. Meredith, The grasses and pastures
of South Africa. Central News Agency, Cape Town.
DALLWITZ, M.J. 1984. User’s guide to the DELTA system — a
genera system for coding taxonomic descriptions. CSIRO
Division of Entomology Report No. 13.
ELLIS, R.P. 1987a. Leaf anatomy of the genus Ehrharta (Po-
aceae): the Setacea group. Bothalia 17: 75-89.
ELLIS, R.P. 1987b. Leaf anatomy of the genus Ehrharta (Po-
aceae): the Villosa group. Bothalia 17: 195-204.
ENGELBRECHT, A.H.P. 1956. 'n Morfologiese studie van die
genus Ehrharta Thunb. M.Sc. thesis, University of Pretoria.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E. 1987a. Taxonomy of the genus Ehrharta
(Poaceae): the Setacea group. Bothalia 17: 63-73.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E. 1987b. Taxonomy of the genus Ehrharta
(Poaceae): the Villosa group. Bothalia 17: 191-194.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E. & ELLIS, R.P. 1987. Species groups in
the genus Ehrharta (Poaceae) in southern Africa. Bothalia
17: 51-65.
NEES AB ESENBECK, G.C. 1841. Florae Africae Australioris.
Prausnitzianus, Cracow.
SMOOK, L. & GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E. 1985. Poaceae. In G.E.
Gibbs Russell et al., List of species of southern African
plants, edn 2, part 1: 45-70. Memoirs of the Botanical
Survey of South Africa No. 51.
STAPF, O. 1900. Gramineae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora
capensis 8: 310-750.
STEUDEL, E.G. 1853. Synopsis plantarum graminearum . Metzler,
Stuttgart.
TATEOKA, T. 1963. Notes on some grasses. XII. Relationships
between Oryzeae and Ehrharteae, with special reference
to leaf anatomy and histology. The Botanical Gazette 124:
264-270.
TRINIUS, C.B. 1839. Phalaridea. Memoires del Academie impe-
rial des Sciences de St-Petersbourg, ser. 6, 5: 12-26 (of
reprint).
WILLEMSE, L.P.M. 1982. A discussion of the Ehrharteae (Gra-
mineae) with special reference to the Malesian taxa former-
ly included in Microlaena. Blumea 28: 181-194.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
Acocks 2281 7 (1) PRE. Adamson 3603 (2) PRE.
Bolus 4225 (1) BOL, PRE. Bond W662 (1) NBG; 1611 (1) PRE.
Boucher 173 (2) STE; 1838 (2) PRE, STE; 2028 (1) PRE, STE.
Bure hell 7184 ( 1) K.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
171
Drige s.n. (1) K, LE (lectotype), P, PRE; s.n. (2) K, LE (lecto-
type), P, PRE, SAM. Du Toit 2027 (1) PRE, STE.
Ecklon s.n. (2) P. Ecklon & Zeyher s.n. (1) LE, SAM; s.n. (2)
LE. Ellis 4695 (1) PRE; 4696 (1) PRE; 5457(1) PRE. Ester-
huysen 7083 (1) BOL; 13657 (1) PRE; 28427 (2) BOL, PRE;
32827a (1) BOL, PRE; 34491 (1) BOL; 35600 (2) BOL, PRE.
Fourcade 2479 (1) BOL, K, PRE, STE; 2852 (1) PRE, STE.
Gill s.n. (1) K.
Haynes 526 (1) K, PRE, STE.
Keet 13-3-1919 (1) PRE. Kensit 14649 (1) BOL.
Ledebour s.n. (2) LE.
MacOwan 2074 (1) SAM; 2126 (1) K.
Paterson 2484 (1) BOL.
Schlechter 3611 (1) PRE; 9809 (1) BOL, K, LE, P, PRE.
Taylor 3221 (1) PRE, STE; 4081 (1) PRE, STE; 4211 (1) JF,
PRE, STE; 5598 (1) PRE; 10256 (1) PRE, STE. Thome Oct.
1926 (1) SAM.
Zeyher 4513 (1) BOL, K, P, PRE, STE; s.n. (1) BOL, LE; s.n.
(2) SAM. Zeyher & Ecklon s.n. (1) P.
SPECIMENS OF THE VILLOSA GROUP OF EHRHARTA
EXAMINED IN BOTHALIA 17,2: 191-194 (1987)
Acocks 14809 (1) PRE; 15185 (1) PRE; 23393 (1) PRE. Adam-
son 1116 (1) PRE; 1240 (2a) BOL; 1360 (2a) PRE; 1362 (2a)
BOL. Andreae 1314 (1) PRE. Archibald 3664 (2b) PRE.
Barker 2718 (2a) NBG. Bohnen 4541 (2a) PRE, STE. Bond 248
(1) NBG; 16 72 (1) NBG; 1685 (1) NBG; 9566 (1) NBG; 9644
(1) NBG. Booysen 2239 (1) NBG. Boucher 662 (2a) STE; 1689
(2b) PRE, STE; 3325 (2a/2b) STE; 3983 (2a) PRE, STE; 4724
(1) PRE, STE. Boucher & Shepherd 5665 (1) PRE. Britten 444
(2b) PRE; 778 (2b) PRE; 1890 (2b) PRE; 1941 (2b) PRE.
Buys 6. 10. 78 (2b) STE.
Cleghom 3122 (2a) PRE, STE. Compton 6262 (1) NBG; 9343
(2a) NBG; 14187 (2a) NBG; 17530 (2b) NBG; 22225(1) NBG,
PRE, STE. Crook 1038 (2a) BOL, NBG, PRE; 2260( 2a) PRE.
Curator, Pretoria 131 (2a) PRE.
Dahlstrand 156 (2b) J, PRE. Dinter 3968 (1) PRE. Dixon 151
(2a) STE. Downing 400 (2a) PRE. Duthie 1642 (1) BOL. Du Toit
1651 (1) PRE, STE; 1668 (1) PRE, STE.
Ecklon Oct. 1838 (1) NBG, SAM. Ecklon & Zeyher 409 (2b)
BOL, NBG, SAM, STE. Ellis 601 (2b) PRE, STE; 708 (1) PRE;
1145 (1) PRE; 1152 (1) PRE; 1284 (2a) PRE; 1651 (l/2a)
PRE; 1686 (2a) PRE; 1700 (1) PRE; 4626 (1) PRE; 4633
(1) PRE; 4635 (1) PRE; 4640 (l/2a) PRE; 4642 (1) PRE;
4648 (1) PRE; 4665 (2a) PRE; 4693 (l/2a) PRE; 5702(1)PRE;
5130 (1) PRE. Emdon 200 (l/2a) PRE, STE. Esterhuysen 3244
(1) PRE; 56 70(1) BOL; 9320 (1) BOL; 22725(1) PRE; 52245
(1) BOL, PRE; 32496 (1) BOL, PRE; 34024 (1) BOL; 34080
(2a) BOL.
Fairale 343 (1) PRE.
Gibbs Russell 5589 (1) PRE; 5591 (1) PRE; 5594 (1) PRE;
5596 (1) PRE; 5607 (1) PRE; 5677 (l/2a) PRE; 5674(1)PRE;
5619 (1) PRE; 5624 (1) PRE; 5628 (1) PRE; 5650 (1) PRE;
5631a (1) PRE; 5638a (1) PRE; 5648 (2a) PRE; 5670 (l/2a)
PRE; 5680 (1) PRE; 5689 (1) PRE. Gluckmann 26/11138 (2a)
J. Grant 4996 (1) PRE.
Hubbard 261 (2a/2b) STE.
Kruger 959 (1) JF, STE; 1681 (1) JF.
Le Maitre 291 (1) JF. Levyns Oct. 1923 (2b) SAM. Liebenberg
4015 (1 /2a) PRE; 4224 (1) PRE; 4229 (2a) STE; 4260 (2a)
STE; 4272 (2a) STE; 4274 (1) STE; 6557 (1) PRE, STE.
Marloth 3046 (2a) PRE, STE; 3712 (2a) PRE; 6024 (2a) PRE.
Merxmueller & Giess 28299 (1) PRE. Moss 3.1.18 (2a) J. M.R.L.
3594 (1) BOL.
Olivier 165 (1) STE.
Pappe Oct. 1838 (1) BOL. Parker 3621 (2a) BOL, NBG. Pater-
son 1097 (2a) BOL. Pearson 5121 (1) BOL, PRE. Phillips 11903
(1) SAM. Pillans 757 9 (1) BOL. Prior April 1903 (2a) SAM.
Schlechter 2098 (1) PRE; 9058 (1) BOL, PRE; 10208 (1) BOL,
PRE. Smith 4969 (2a) PRE. Stocks s.n. (2b) STE. Story 4328
(1) PRE.
Taylor 10167 (2b) PRE, STE. Theron 1108 (2b) PRE. Thoday
Nov. 1921 (2a) BOL. Tyson 607 ( 1) BOL, NBG; 8598 (2b)
PRE, STE; 14870 (2b) BOL; 7 7549 (2b) PRE.
UPE Staff 158 (2b) PRE.
Van Breda 4 (1) PRE. Van Breda & Joubert 2175 (1) STE.
Van der Byl Sept. 1927 (2a) SAM, STE. Van der Merwe 1201
(l/2a) PRE. Van Rensburg 111 (1) PRE, STE; 276 (1) STE.
Walgate 639 (2b) NBG. Walker Dec. 1976 (2a) J. Wolley Dod
3229 (2a) BOL.
Zeyher 167 (1) BOL, PRE, SAM; 4509 (1) PRE; 45096 (2a)
PRE. Zinn 67672 (1) SAM.
Bothalia 18,2: Bothalia 18,2: 173-181 (1988)
The Oxygonum dregeanum complex (Polygonaceae)
G. GERMISHUIZEN*
Keywords: new status, new taxa, Oxygonum dregeanum complex, Polygonaceae, southern Africa, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
The Oxygonum dregeanum Meisn. complex was studied. The following taxa are given a new status: subsp.
swazicum (Burtt Davy) Germishuizen, stat. nov. and subsp. canescens (Sond.) Germishuizen, stat. nov. Four
new varieties of subsp. canescens are described: var. linearifolium Germishuizen, var. nov.; var. dissectum Ger-
mishuizen, var. nov.; var. pilosum Germishuizen, var. nov. and var. lobophyllum Germishuizen, var. nov. Two
new subspecies are described: subsp. streyi Germishuizen, subsp. nov. and subsp. lanceolatum Germishuizen,
subsp. nov.
UITTREKSEL
Die kompleks Oxygonum dregeanum Meisn. is bestudeer. Nuwe status is aan die volgende taksons toegeken:
subsp. swazicum (Burtt Davy) Germishuizen, stat. nov. en subsp. canescens (Sond.) Germishuizen, stat. nov.
Vier nuwe varieteite van subsp. canescens word beskryf: var. linearifolium Germishuizen, var. nov.; var. dissec-
tum Germishuizen, var. nov.; var. pilosum Germishuizen, var. nov. en var. lobophyllum Germishuizen, var. nov.
Twee nuwe subspesies word beskryf: subsp. streyi Germishuizen, subsp. nov. en subsp. lanceolatum Germishui-
zen, subsp. nov.
As part of a revision of the genus Oxygonum Burch,
in southern Africa, to be published in the Flora of south-
ern Africa, the Oxygonum dregeanum complex was
studied. Two subspecies and four varieties are new and
are here described. A list of the changes in rank of the
different taxa of Oxygonum dregeanum are given.
Oxygonum dregeanum Meisn. in Linnaea 14: 487
(1840). Type: neighbourhood of Omsamculo (Umzim-
kulu) (location and collector uncertain).
(a) subsp. dregeanum.
O. dregeanum Meisn.: 487 (1840); C.H. Wr.: 461 (1912);
Tikovsky & Merxm.: 4 (1969); O. dregeanum Meisn. var. dre-
geanum— R.A. Grah.: 166 (1957); Ross: 156 (1972). Type as
above.
O. dregei Meisn.: 38 (1856). Type: Port Natal, Krauss 283
[K, lecto.!, designated by Graham: 166 (1957)].
O. natalense Schltr.: 92 (1907). Type: Natal, Alexandria,
Rudatis 74 (Type not seen).
Found in grassland in sandy soil in Natal and Transkei.
Figure 1.
Vouchers: Huntley 717 (NH, PRE); Johnson 414 (NBG,
STE-U); Strey 8861 (PRE); Wood 628 (GRA, PRE, SAM).
(b) subsp. streyi Germishuizen, subsp. nov., a sub-
specie typica habitu multiramoso, caudice longo cylin-
drico rubro, ocrea subulato-lobata, inflorescentia brevi
differt.
TYPE. — Natal, 3030 (Port Shepstone): Sea Park,
R.G. Strey 11369 (PRE, holo; NH). Figure 2.
Robust, spreading, decumbent perennial herb, much
branched from a long, thick, red vertical rootstock; root-
* Botanical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and
Water Supply, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001.
MS. received: 1988.01.19.
stock over 200 mm long and 25 mm in diameter. Stems
angular, longitudinally ridged, reddish brown, densely
hairy with white velutinous appressed hairs, rarely glab-
rous; with short internodes. Ocrea membranous, lobed,
reddish brown, densely hairy with white velutinous ap-
pressed hairs, 4—5 mm long; lobes 3,0— 4,5 mm long,
ending in a narrow red tip .Leaves simple, sessile, glabrous
except for white velutinous appressed hairs along the
midrib and base of the leaves; blade elliptic to narrowly
obovate, (8)13—31(32) x (1,5)3—12 mm, acuminate,
ending in a stiff tip, margins crisped. Inflorescence a
short axillary thyrse with fascicles of 1—4 flowers in the
axils of the cup-shaped bracts; axis 40-100 mm long.
Perianth 5-lobed, white, glabrous except for the dense
pilose hairs at the base; the lobes free almost to the base,
5—8 x 2,5 mm, the outer 2 segments keeled at the apex;
pedicels up to 4 mm long, glabrous. Stamens 8, inserted
on the inner perianth; anthers 1 mm long, reddish brown;
filaments 4—5 mm long, with a basal ring of reddish cilia.
FIGURE 1. — Distribution of Oxygonum dregeanum subsp. dre-
geanum.
174
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
FIGURE 2. — Holotype of Oxygo-
num dregeamm Meisn. subsp.
streyi Germishuizen.
Styles 3, up to 5 mm long, joined for three-quarters of
their length; stigmas capitate. Fruit 9x3 mm, ovoid,
longitudinally ridged, waited between the ridges, veluti-
nous, crowned with the persistent perianth.
Occurs mostly in coastal grassland and palm veld on
sandy soils in Natal. Figure 3.
NATAL. — 2632 (Bella Vista): 40 km from Ndumu on road
to Kosi Bay (-DC), Strey 10305 (NH, PRE). 2732 (Ubombo):
8 km south of Muzi (-AD), Ross <£ Moll 5097 (NH, PRE); IDC
rice project site, 2 km from turnoff to Phelendaba on Mbazwana
road (-BA), Germishuizen 3639 (PRE); just east of Vazi Swamp,
Mazengwenya (-BA), Moll 4741 (PRE); between Lake Vazi
and Sibayi area (-BA), Vahrmeijer 1088 (PRE); 16 km north of
Lake Sibayi on road to Maputo (-BC), Vahrmeijer & Toelken
265 (NH, PRE); Sordwana Bay (-DA), Gerstner 3683 (NH,
PRE); near Bhangazi, Sordwana State Forest ( - D A), MacDevette
1235 (NH, PRE). 2830 (Dundee): Qudeni (-DB), Gerstner
396 7 (NH, PRE). 2832 (Mtubatuba): Richards Bay (-CC),
Venter 4873 (PRE). 2930 (Pietermaritzburg): Inanda (-DB),
Medley Wood 313 (K); Clairmont (-DD), Medley Wood 10497
(NH); Schlechter 2950A (NH). 3030 (Port Shepstone): Sea
Park (-CB), Strey 11369 (NH, PRE); Munster (-CC), Gemmell
sn. (PRE); Uvongo (-CD), Acocks 10907 (PRE); Liebenberg
8102 ( PRE); Mogg 13160 (PRE); Margate, Village of Happiness
(-CD), Coleman 659 (NH); Margate (-CD), Strey 10940, 11023
(NH, PRE); 11069 (NH); St. Michaels on Sea (-CD), Nichol-
son 82 (NH). 3130 (Port Edward): Port Edward (-AA), Nichol-
son 1 712 (PRE); Taylor 5383 (NBG); near Omobaleni (Mgungu)
(-AA), Acocks 13385 (PRE).
This taxon is readily distinguished from the others by
the much branched decumbent habit, the short inter-
nodes, the long, red, cylindrical rootstock and the short
axillary inflorescences.
This subspecies is named in honour of Mr R.G. Strey,
who brought to my attention the fact that this taxon is
different from the typical species.
(c) subsp. swazicum (Burtt Davy) Germishuizen,
stat. nov.
O. zeyheri Sond. var. swazicum Burtt Davy: 167 (1926).
Type: Swaziland, Stewart s.n (K, holo.l).
O. dregeanum Meisn. var. swazicum (Burtt Davy) R. Grah.:
167 (1957).
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
175
FIGURE 3. — Distribution of Oxygonum dregeanum subsp.
streyi, •; subsp. swazicum, A.
Occurs in eastern and south-eastern Transvaal and
Swaziland (Figure 3). This taxon is distinguished from
the typical subspecies in having deeply linear-lobed leaves
and an unevenly lobed ocrea.
Vouchers: Bolus 12260 (BOL, PRE); Kluge 287 (PRE);
Rogers 11484 (K, NH); Stewarts.ru TM 8880 (GRA, PRE).
(d) subsp. canescens (Sond.) Germishuizen, stat.
nov.
with a small spreading prickle a third of the way from
the base, long and sharp or short and obtuse, obscurely
puberulous.
Five varieties are recognized that can be distinguished
by the lobing of the leaves.
var. canescens
The leaves are deeply divided into 3—9 lobes. Only
the lower lobes are shallowly divided again. Occurs in
open grassland, savanna and thornveld on red sandy soils
in Botswana, Transvaal, northern Orange Free State and
northern Cape Province. Figure 4.
Vouchers: Bayliss 4515 (NBG, PRE); Louw 94 (GRA, PRE);
Morris & Engelbrecht 1070 ( PRE); Pegler991 (BOL, PRE, SAM).
var. linearifolium Germishuizen, var. nov., a varie-
tate typica foliis linearibus integris differt.
TYPE. — Transvaal, Pretoria District, beside freeway
to eastern Transvaal at turnoff to Onbekend, Mauve &
Reid 5326 (PRE, holo.). Figure 5.
A much branched herb with linear leaves, rarely with
1—2 short teeth at the base of lower leaves. Stems and
leaves often dotted with black glands. Occurs in grass-
land, sour bushveld and in disturbed area along road-
sides in the central, southern and south-eastern Trans-
vaal and northern Natal. Figure 6.
O. canescens Sond.: 100(1850); Meisn.: 38 (1856); C.H. Wr.:
462 (1912); Burtt Davy: 167 (1926); Compton: 192 (1976).
O. dregeanum Meisn. var. canescens (Sond.) R.Grah.: 167 (1957).
Type: Transvaal, Aapjesrivier, Zeyher 1451a (W, holo.!).
O. zeyheri Sond.: 100 (1850); Meisn.: 38 (1856); C.H. Wr.:
460 (1912); Burtt Davy: 167 (1926); Compton: 192 (1976).
Type: Transvaal, Magaliesburg, Zeyher 1451b (W, holo.!).
O. calcaratum Meisn.: 38 (1856); Schinz: 870 (1901); C.H.
Wr.: 462 (1912); Burtt Davy: 167 (1926). Type: British Bechu-
analand [northern Cape Province], ‘near the source of Kuruman
river’, Burchett 2459 (K, holo.!).
Annual herb, up to 0,5 m tall, much branched from a
thick vertical perennial woody rootstock. Stems angular,
sulcate, erect, occasionally decumbent, not much swollen
at the nodes, finely to densely white strigose puberulous,
long pilose or rarely glabrous, sometimes dotted with
black glands. Ocreae lobed, up to 5 mm long, finely to
densely strigose puberulous; lobes triangular, ending in
slender red seta, nearly as long as the tube. Leaves (10—)
15— 65(— 70) x (1— )2-20(-26) mm, fleshy, linear,
lanceolate or rhomboid, entire or with 1—2 short teeth
at the base or deeply pinnately or bipinnately lobed; the
lobes linear, further lobed, acute, sometimes with a red
mucro, narrowing and tapering to a short petiole, white
strigose puberulous. Inflorescence a long lax thyrse with
fascicles of up to 3 flowers in the axils of the brown,
ovate cuspidate membranous bracts without seta. Perianth
5-lobed, white, yellow or pinkish; lobes oblong, up to
5 mm long, densely white pilose outside below; pedicels
up to 4 mm long, reddish brown, eglandular, pubescent.
Stamens 8, included; filaments white, up to 5 mm long,
with a ring of red-brown cilia one eighth from the base;
anthers blue, up to 1 mm long. Styles heterostylous, 3,
up to 5 mm long, joined for half their length; ovary pu-
bescent with 3 basal horns. Fruit an obovoid nut, up to
10 x 5 mm, 9-ridged, transversely wrinkled, sometimes
TRANSVAAL.— 2527 (Rustenburg): Jack Scott Private
Nature Reserve (-DC), Wells 2405 (PRE). 2528 (Pretoria):
Great North Road at turnoff to Rust De Winter (-AD), Mauve,
Reid & Smook 5315 (PRE); Kwandebele, Gemsbokfontein
Farm (-BD), Van Hoepen 1680 (PRE); Pretoria (-CA), Rogers
s.ru (PRE); Rooikop (-CA), Smuts & Gittett 2124 (PRE);
Kwaggaspoort (-CA), Verdoom s.n. (PRE); RietvaJlei 221
(— CA), Acocks 11280 (PRE); Koedoespoort (-CB), Werder-
mann & Oberdieck 1244 (PRE); Van der Merwe Station (-CB),
Janse 55 (PRE, SAM); Donkerhoek, 35 km from Pretoria
(—CD); Repton 672 (PRE); 1,8 km S of Rayton on road to
Cullinan (-DA), Davidse 5988 (PRE); Premier Mine (-DA),
Menzies s.ru (PRE); 37 km E of Pretoria (-DC), Dyer & Collett
4680 (PRE); Bronkhorstspruit, Kaalfontein 613 JR Farm (-DC),
Krynauw 985 (PRE); beside freeway to eastern Transvaal af
turnoff to Onbekend (-DC), Mauve & Reid 5326 (PRE). 2529
(Witbank): Groblersdal (-AB), Venter 2971 (PRE); NW side of
Loskopdam (-AC), Reid 686 (PRE); ‘The Hell’, near Loskop-
FIGURE 4. — Distribution of Oxygonum dregeanum subsp. ca-
nescens var. canescens.
176
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
FIGURE 5. — Holotype of Oxygonum
dregeamim Meisn. subsp. canes-
cens (Sond.) Germishuizen vai.
linearifolium Germishuizen.
dam (-AD), Germishuizen 1392 (PRE); Loskopdam, Twee-
loopfontein (-AD), Theron 1716, 2026 (PRE, PRU); Witbank
(-CC), Rogers 2568 (GRA); between Bronkhorstspruit and
Witbank (— CC), Killick 3839 (PRE). 2530 (Lydenburg): Skur-
weberg, Makobulaan (-BA), Onderstall 1201 (PRE). 2628
(Johannesburg): Modderfontein (-AA), Prosser s.n. (NBG,
PRE); 43 km SE of Pretoria, 1 mile (1,6 km) E of Bapsfontein
(-BB), Codd 2575 (PRE). 2629 (Bethal): Breyten (-BD), Steyn
999 (NBG).
NATAL. — 2730 (Vryheid): Mooihoek (—AC), Devenish
938 (PRE); 11 km from Vryheid on road to Louwsburg (— DD),
Germishuizen 2260 (PRE).
var. dissectum Germishuizen , var. nov., a varietate
typica lobis profundioribus, pluribus, et apicibus (lobo-
rum) acutis differt.
TYPE. — Transvaal, Pietersburg, Feb. 1904, H. Bolus
s.n. (BOL, holo.; GRA). Figure 7.
The leaves of this plant are deeply divided and the FIGURE 6. — Distribution of Oxygonum dregeanum subsp. ca-
lobes in turn are again divided; each lobe ending in a nescens var. linearifolium.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
111
long slender tip. Occurs in grassland in sandy soils in the
northern Transvaal, especially in the Pietersburg area.
Figure 8.
TRANSVAAL. — 2329 (Pietersburg): Blinkwater (-AA),
Bremekamp & Schweickerdt 188 (PRE); Pietersburg (-CD),
Bolus s.ru (BOL, GRA); Pietersburg Nature Reserve (-CD),
Bredenkamp & Van Vuuren 123 (PRE); Marabastad (-CD),
Nelson 118 (PRE). 2428 (Nylstroom): Naboomspruit, Mosdene
(-DA), Galpin M305 (PRE, SAM). 2429 (Zebediela): Percy
Fyfe Nature Reserve (-AA), Huntley 1146, 1550 (PRE); Luns-
khp, about 32 km NNE of Potgietersrust (-AA), Maguire 1370
(NBG).
var. pilosum Germishuizen, var. nov., a varietate
typica lobis inferioribus foliorum longioribus et plantis
pilosis differt.
TYPE.— Transvaal, Twentyfour Rivers, F.A. Rogers
23637 (PRE, holo.). Figure 9.
This taxon differs from the typical variety by the
lower lobes of the leaves being over 1 5 mm in length,
and the whole plant covered with long white pilose hairs.
Occurs only in the north-western Transvaal, especially in
the Waterberg area in savanna on sandy soils. Figure 8.
TRANSVAAL. — 2428 (Nylstroom): Alma, 56 km NW of
Warmbaths (-AC), Bayliss 2007 (NBG); Van Rensburg Farm,
43 km along Nylstroom-Vaalwater road (-AC), Leeuwenberg
10900 (PRE); Waterberg, Vaalwater, Farm Nooitgedacht (-AC),
Westfall 2279 (PRE); Waterberg, Zandrivierspoort near Alma on
Farm Witpoort (-AC), Van Wyk 26 79 (PRE, PRU); Twenty-
four Rivers (-AD), Rogers 23637 (PRE); Geelhoutkop (-AD),
Breyers.ru (PRE).
var. lobophyllum Germishuizen, var. nov., a varie-
tate typica lobis foliis latioribus et lobis ocreae triangu-
laribus differt.
TYPE. — Transvaal, 18 km ENE of Pretoriuskop,
Acocks 16643 (PRE, holo.). Figure 10.
The leaves are shallowly and deeply lobed but not di-
vided up to the midrib, rarely entire; lobes usually wider
than 2 mm. Occurs in the northern and eastern Transvaal
and Swaziland in woodland, bushveld and grassland in
sandy loam or granitic soils. Figure 8.
FIGURE 7. — Holotype of Oxygonum dre-
geanum Meisn. subsp. canescens (Sond.)
Germishuizen var. dissectum Germis-
huizen.
Austro Africanae.
no iom.
.OJU^OiUcuv lUzjlvru-, Sc-tvL
, £-r H-t
Oxygonum dregeanum
canescens (Sond.) <
var. dissectum Ger:
178
FIGURE 8. — Distribution of Oxygonum dregeanum subsp. ca-
nescens vai.dissectum, A; vai.pilosum, 4; vai.lobophyllum.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
TRANSVAAL. — 2230 (Messina): Venda, Ha-Lambani (-DD),
Mugwedi 1665 (PRE). 2329 (Petersburg): 13 km from Bandoliers-
kop on Petersburg road (-BD), Story 1833 (PRE). 2330 (Tza-
neen): Hans Merensky Nature Reserve (-DA), Oates 88, 128
(PRE). 2431 (Acomhoek): Farm Kempiana 90 KU, Timbavati
Private Nature Reserve (-AD), Zambatis 1470 (PRE); Pilgrims
Rest District, Manyeleti Game Reserve (-DA), Bredenkamp
1262, 1382 (PRE). 2530 (Lydenburg): Nelspruit (-BD), Breyer
s.n. (PRE); Nelspruit Research Station (-BD), Liebenberg 2152
(PRE). 2531 (Komatipoort): Kruger National Park, 18 km ENE
of Pretoriuskop (-AB), Acocks 16643 (PRE); near Pretoriuskop
(- AB), Codd & De Winter 4933 (PRE); 10 km N of Pretorius-
kop on road to Skukuza (-AB), Codd & De Winter 4993, 4994
(PRE); Nohpe (-AB), Van der Schijff 1541 (PRE); Kaapmui-
den (— CB), Rogers s.ru (PRE).
SWAZILAND. —2631 (Mbabane): Malinda Hill (-AC),
Compton 28433, 29775 (NBG, PRE); Stegi District, Sicusha
(-BC), Compton 32472 (NBG, PRE).
(e) subsp. lanceolatum Germishuizen , subsp. nov.
a subspecie typica foliis angustioribus et tepalis vinoso-
rubris differt.
TYPE. — Transvaal, Lekgalameetse Nature Reserve,
The Downs, Makwens, M. Stalmans 192 (PRE, holo.).
Figure 1 1 .
FIGURE 9. — Holotype of Oxygonum dre-
geanum Meisn. subsp. canescens (Sond.)
Germishuizen var. pilosum Germishui-
zen.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
179
FIGURE 10. — Holotype of Oxy-
gonum dregeanum Meisn.
subsp. canescens (Sond.)Ger-
mishuizen var. lobophyllum
Germishuizen.
7 'K / ttt / ,
J, }1 ff C(c.ocs * /&. iS
c 'Zoo'
Z3///53
liTwtn
Robust herb, arising from a thick vertical perennial
woody rootstock, with many erect annual stems up to
0,3 m long. Stems much branched, angular, sulcate, fine-
ly and densely strigose puberulous, rarely glabrous,
sometimes reddish tinged. Ocrea up to 8 mm long, lobed,
membranous, brown, sometimes with a reddish tinge,
white strigose puberulous, rarely glabrous; lobes up to
4 mm long, ending in a narrow red tip. Leaves (15—)
20— 33(— 40) x (1 — )1 ,5 — 3,5(— 8) mm, lanceolate to
narrowly ovate, rarely lobed towards base, glabrous ex-
cept for a few white appressed hairs along the midrib at
base and along margins, rarely white strigose puberulous,
acute, all ending in a stiff point, tapering to narrow
petiole, mostly with dark red margins especially near
apex. Inflorescence an axillary or terminal thyrse with
up to 3 flowers in brown, cuspidate, cup-shaped bracts;
axis 50—200 mm long. Perianth 5-lobed, white, deep
pink or wine-red tinged along centre on outside of outer
3 lobes, densely pilose at base becoming glabrous towards
the apex; lobes free almost to base, up to 7 mm long,
outer 3 lobes keeled at apex; pedicels strigose, up to 4
mm long. Stamens 8, inserted on inner perianth lobes;
filaments of different lengths, up to 5 mm long; anthers
up to 1,5 mm long, reddish brown, with a ring of red-
dish brown cilia at base. Styles 3, heterostylous, 2,5—
6,0 mm long, joined for less than half their length. Fruit
an ovoid nut, up to 12 mm long, slightly 3-angled, usual-
ly without 3 blunt teeth at base, 9-ridged, transversely
wrinkled, glabrous.
Found in open grassland and on montane rocky grass-
land, or rarely in woodland in Transvaal, Swaziland and
Natal. Figure 12.
TRANSVAAL. — 2430 (Pilgrims Rest): L^kgalameetse Nature
Reserve, Makwens (-AA), Stalmans 192 (PRE); Haffenden
Heights (-AA), Stalmans 174 (PRE); road to Makwens (-AA),
Stalmans 634 (PRE); The Downs (-AA), Junod 4253 (PRE),
Stalmans 1452 (PRE); on top of Orrie Baragwanath Pass (-AA),
Reid 1159 (PRE); Ohrigstad Dam Nature Reserve (-DC),
Jacobsen 1769 (PRE); Mount Sheba Nature Reserve, N slope
of Mount Sheba (-DD), De Winter 9361 (PRE); Graskop
(-DD), Galpin 14569 (PRE); Graskop, Stanley Bush Kop
(-DD), P. & G. Raal 1035 (PRE); Pilgrims Rest (-DD), Rogers
14314 (PRE). 2530 (Lydenburg): Boschhoek, western Steen-
180
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
Oxygonum dregeanum Melsn. subsp.
lanceolatum Germishuizen
"i 1988
$ metOW
HERBARIUM PRETORIA
f,5G053
FIGURE 11. — Holotype of Oxygo
mm dregeamm Meisn. subsp.
lanceolatum Germishuizen.
FIGURE 12. — Distribution of Oxygonum dregeanum subsp.
lanceolatum.
kampsberg (-AA), Young A407 (PRE); Hartebeestvlakte (-B A),
Mohle 151 (PRE); Mauchsberg, Sabie (-BB), Smuts & Gillett
2306 (PRE, STE-U); Wonderkloof Nature Reserve (-BC), Elan-
Puttick 128 (PRE); Belfast (-CA), Jenkins s.n. (PRE). 2531
(Komatipoort): Barberton (-CC), Pott 5469 (PRE); Thorn-
croft s.n. (PRE); Saddleback Mountain (-CQ, Galpin 615
(NH, PRE, SAM); Osterbeek Farm, 5 km S of Barberton (-CC),
De Sousa 626 (PRE); Swaziland border, Daylight Farm, Bearded
Man Mountain {-CD),Buitendag 756 (NBG, PRE). 2629 (Bethal):
Ermelo (— DB), Riley 12 (PRE).
SWAZILAND. — 2531 (Komatipoort): Havelock Mine, Piggs
Peak (-CC), Miller 2988 (PRE). 2631 (Mbabane): Malolotja
Nature Reserve, Nkhaba (-AA), Heath 470 (PRE); Black Mbu-
luzi Valley (-AA), Dlamini s.n. (NBG, PRE); Ukutula (-AC),
Compton 25256 (NBG, PRE); Compton 24501 (NBG).
NATAL. — 2731 (Louwsburg): 15 km from Ngome Forest
Station on road to Vryheid (-CD), Germishuizen 2133 (PRE);
12 km from Ngome Forest Station on road to Vryheid (-CD),
Buthelezi 115 (NH, PRE). 2829 (Harrismith): Klip River, Stryd-
hoek, Tintwa Mountains (— CB), Doidge s.n. (PRE). 2930 (Pieter-
maritzburg): Tweedie (-AC), Curator Pretoria 3462 (PRE);
Greytown (-BA), Wylie s.n. (PRE); Pietermaritzburg, Table
Mountain (-CB), Killick 732 (NBG).
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
My thanks go to the following: the curators and staff
of BOL, GRA, K, NH, NBG, PRE, SAM, STE-U and W
for the loan of their material; Dr H.F. Glen for translating
the diagnoses into Latin; and Mrs A.J. Romano wski for
the photographs.
REFERENCES
BURTT DAVY, J. 1926. A manual of the flowering plants and
ferns of the Transvaal with Swaziland, South Africa 1:
167. Longmans, Green, London.
COMPTON, R.H. 1976. Polygonaceae. Flora of Swaziland.
Journal of South African Botany, Supplement Vol. 11:
192.
GRAHAM, R.A. 1957. A revision of Oxygonum. Kew Bulletin
1: 166-167.
181
MEISNER, C.F. 1840. Polygoneae. In D.F.L. Schlechtendal,
Linnaea 14: 487.
MEISNER, C.F. 1856. Polygonaceae. In A.P. De Candolle,
Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 14: 38.
Paris.
ROSS, J.H. 1972. Flora of NataL Memoirs of the Botanical
Survey of South Africa No. 39: 156. Government Printer,
Pretoria.
SCHINZ, H. 1901. Polygonaceae. Bulletin de I’Herbier Boissier
ser. 2,1: 870.
SCHLECHTER, R. 1907. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Flora von
Natal. In H.G.A. Engler, Botanische Jahrbucher 40: 92.
Leipzig.
SONDER, O.W. 1850. In D.F.L. Schlechtendal, Linnaea 23 : 100.
Halle, Berlin.
TIKOVSKY, H. & MERXMULLER, H. 1969. Polygonaceae. In
H. Merxmuller, Prodromus einer Flora von Sudwest-afrika
23: 4. Cramer, Lehre.
WRIGHT, C.H. 1912. Polygonaceae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer,
Flora capensis 5,1: 461-462. Reeve, London.
Bothalia 18,2: 183-188 (1988)
Notes on African plants
VARIOUS AUTHORS
BRASSICACEAE
HELIOPHILA CORNELLSBER GIA , A NEW SPECIES FROM THE RICHTERSVELD
Heliophila comellsbergia B.J. Pienaar & A. Nicholas
sp. nov. H. patenti Oliv. et H. diffusae (Thunb.) DC. var.
diffusae et vai.flaccae (Sond.) Marais affrnis; a H. patenti
floribus multo maioribus et fructu globoso, inflato dif-
fert; a H. diffusae et varietatibus foliis non divisis differt.
Herba annua. Caulis unum ad aliquot. Folia simplices,
integra, estipulata, anguste-lanceolata ad elliptica, 10-
40 x 2—8 mm. Flores albi. Petala 2,9— 4,5 x 1,4— 2,5
(—2,8) mm. Fructus globosus, 3,0— 4, 0(— 4,5) x 3,0—
3,8(— 4,0) mm, valvis inflatis.
TYPE.— 2817 (Vioolsdrif): (-CA) Richtersveld,
Cornellsberg in Stinkfontein Mountains, southern slopes
to a neck south of the top, 1977.09.06, Oliver, Tolken &
Venter 715 (PRE, holo.; K, MO).
Soft, patently hairy, annual herb, (110— )1 55— 290
mm high. Stems one to several, erect, lax, patently pu-
bescent. Leaves simple, alternate, entire, exstipulate,
narrow-lanceolate to obtusely elliptic, marginally pu-
bescent, midrib ventrally visible, 10—40 x 2—8 mm,
larger leaves near the stem base, both stem and leaves
often tinted purple. Racemes few to many-flowered, lax,
axis elongating in fruit. Pedicels in flower 3—11 mm
long, in fruit 6 — 10( — 12) mm long, initially ascending,
recurved (almost drooping) when mature, patently pu-
bescent. Flowers white, drying cream. Sepals (2,0—)
2,1— 2,5 x 1,0— 1,4 mm, membranous, dark cream in
colour; outer 2 cucullate, inner 2 saccate, margin broad-
ly transparent, tinted purple apically. Petals 2,9— 4,5 x
1,4— 2,5(-2,8) mm, obovate above, claw with lateral
papillate appendage. Filaments 1,6— 1,9 mm and 1,2—
1,7 mm long, the 2 shorter filaments basally papillate.
Anthers (0,5-)0,6-0,7(-0,8) mm long. Ovary globose,
0,4— 0,6 mm in diameter, 2 ovules, style as long as ovary;
stigma capitate, papillate. Fruits globose, 3,0— 4, 0(— 4,5)
x 3,0— 3, 8(— 4,0) mm, puberulent, valves inflated, faint-
ly 1 -nerved, tinged purple when mature; style persistent,
filiform, 2,0— 3,0 mm long. Seeds 1 or 2, 0,8— 1,0 mm in
diameter, narrowly winged. Figures 1 & 2.
CAPE. — 2817 (Vioolsdrif): Rosyntjiesberg, (-AC), Oliver,
Tolken & Venter 302 (PRE); Cornellsberg (-CA), Oliver, Tolken
& Venter 715 (K, MO, PRE).
Heliophila comellsbergia is endemic to mountainous
areas of the Richtersveld. Found in stoney places, in
well drained clayey loam soils, it occurs on the southern
slopes of mountains where it may grow in open or shaded
areas. Oliver, Tolken & Venter record it as locally com-
mon. The Richtersveld is a mountainous area that bor-
ders on the Namib Desert. For much of the year it is
a harsh, extremely dry area in which only succulent
plants and plants with underground storage organs sur-
vive. Good rains in August-September transform parts
of the Richtersveld into a carpet of flowers, as in Nama-
qualand. It is at this period that one finds an abundance
of annuals, such as Heliophila comellsbergia.
The specific epithet comellsbergia is derived from the
isolated locality in which this new Heliophila species was
collected. Cornellsberg is a peak in the Stinkfontein
Mountain range. Oliver, Tolken & Venter collected the
type specimen on the southern slopes, towards the neck
of this peak.
Y h
FIGURE 1. — Holotype {Oliver, Tolken & Venter 715) of Helio-
phila comellsbergia housed at PRE (Photograph by A. Ro-
manowski).
184
FIGURE 2. — 1, petal with claw
and basal appendage, X 1 3 ;
2, stamens, 2a, longer sta-
men without basal papillae,
X 29; 2b, shorter stamen
with basal papillae, X 30;
3, mature globose fruit, X
3. All drawings based on
Oliver, Tolken & Venter
302 (PRE). Drawings by
G. Condy.
Although the material of this new Heliophila species
is limited, the authors find it desirable to name this taxon
for two reasons; a, the remoteness of the area in which
this species occurs, making it unlikely that it will be col-
lected again in the near future; b, the distinctive, unique
morphology of H. comellsbergia.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
Heliophila comellsbergia most closely resembles H.
patens Oliv., another Heliophila species of restricted dis-
tribution. H. patens has so far only been recorded from
the Piketberg and a collecting site somewhere between
Knechtsvlakte (this name is probably an orthographic
error and should be Knersvlakte) and Sandveld near Van-
rhynsdorp (Figure 3). However, H. comellsbergia differs
from H. patens in a number of structurally important
and taxonomically significant ways. Of particular note
are the larger flowers, recurved, inflated, globose, 1 or 2-
seeded fruits and pubescent stems, leaves, pedicels and
fruits of H. comellsbergia; H. patens has obovate to
subcircular, laterally flattened fruits with at least two
seeds (Table 1; Figure 4). Although H. comellsbergia
appears to be allied to H. patens, the relationship between
these two species is probably distant. Using Marais’s
(1970) key to Heliophila in the Flora of southern Africa,
H. comellsbergia keys out to H. diffusa (Thunb.) DC.,
FIGURE 3. — Distribution of Heliophila comellsbergia, •; H.
patens, <>; H. diffusa var. diffusa, ■; and H. diffusa var.
flacca, A.
TABLE 1 . — Comparison of selected characters in Heliophila comellsbergia, H. patens, H. diffusa var. diffusa and H. diffusa var. flacca
important diagnostic characters.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
185
FIGURE 4. — Scatter diagram (leaf width X fruit length) illus-
trating the distinctness of Heliophila cornellsbergia, <>;
H. patens, o; H. diffusa var. diffusa, ■; and H. diffusa
var. flacca, A . Solid symbols = pinnately compound leaves,
unfilled symbols = simple undivided leaves.
which has two varieties, viz. var. diffusa and var. flacca
(Sond.) Marais. This species differs from H. cornellsbergia
in having pinnately compound leaves, 1— 8-seeded, flat
fruits and glabrous vegetative parts. Although allied to
H. diffusa, the relationship is not considered close.
In his southern African flora treatment, Marais (1970)
places H. patens, H. diffusa var. diffusa and var. flacca
following one another, and there is little doubt that H.
cornellsbergia should be placed with this complex. It is
probable that a long period of isolation on the mountains
of the Richtersveld could explain why it differs fairly
markedly from its nearest relatives, which occur some
distance to the south (Figure 3).
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
Heliophila cornellsbergia B.J. Pienaar & A. Nicholas
CAPE. — 2817 (Vioolsdrif): Rosyntjiesberg (-AC), Oliver,
Tolken & Venter 302 (PRE); Comellsberg (-CA), Oliver, Tol-
ken & Venter 715 (PRE, holo. ; K, MO, iso.).
Heliophila patens Oliv.
CAPE. — 3218 (Clanwilliam): Piketberg (-DD), Bolus 7530*
(BOL, NBG, PRE, SAM, isotypes), Schlechter 3482 (PRE),
5183 (BOL). Without precise locality: between Knechtsvlakte
& Sandveld (possibly 3118BC?), Leipoldt 3963* (BOL, PRE).
Heliophila diffusa (Thunb.) DC. var. diffusa
CAPE. — 3218 (Clanwilliam): Elandskloof (-BD), Adamson
s.n. (BOL 27121), Lewis s.n. (BOL 27120). 3318 (Cape Town):
Kapokberg (- AD), Bolus 12599* (PRE); Lions’ Head & Rump
(—CD), Lilians 3924* (PRE), Ecklon & Zeyher 71* (SAM);
Devils Peak (—CD), Ecklon & Zeyher 70* (SAM); Hercules
Pillar (— DB), Compton 13673* (NBG); Tigerberg (-DC),
Esterhuysen 17509 (PRE); Groot Drakenstein Mts, Duiwels-
kloof (-DD), Esterhuysen 14046* (BOL); Seven Sisters Mtn,
Paarl (-DD), Esterhuysen 23928 (BOL). 3319 (Worcester):
Kleinvlei Bridge (-AB), Acocks 19884* (PRE); Elandskloof
(-AC), Compton 16179 (NBG); Steendal, Tulbagh (-AC),
Zeyher s.n. (SAM 14059)*; Theronsberg (-BC), Compton
11788* (NBG). 3418 (Simonstown): Constantiaberg (-AB)
Compton 13916 (NBG). Precise locality unknown: Ecklon &
Zeyher s.n. (PRE 23076); Braakfontein (?), Schlechter 3840
(PRE).
Heliophila diffusa (Thunb.) DC. var. flacca
CAPE. — 3318 (Simonstown): Helderberg (-BB), Parker
4247* (NBG); Jonkershoek (-DD), Compton 15339* (NBG),
Lewis 3132* (SAM). 3419 (Caledon): Grabouw (— AA), Stokoe
s.n* (SAM 64258); Caledon (-AB), Ecklon & Zeyher 69* (K
142686, holo.; SAM, iso.); Caledon near hotsprings (-AB),
Zeyher s.n. (K 142686), Zwarteberg, Zeyher 1894 (PRE).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank the Director and
staff (particularly Dr H. Glen, G. Condy, A. Romanowski,
B. Schrire and J. van Rooy) of the Botanical Research
Institute. The Directors and staff of BOL, K, NBG, and
SAM are thanked for the loan of specimens. The referees
are also thanked for their valuable contribution.
REFERENCE
MARAIS, W. 1970. Cruciferae. In Flora of southern Africa 13:
1 — 118. Government Printer, Pretoria.
B.J. PIENAAR and A. NICHOLAS
* Specimen cited in Flora of southern Africa by Marais (1970).
MS. received: 1988.03.28.
ERICACEAE
COILOSTIGMA ZEYHER1ANUM — A CORRECTION
In ‘Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae). V. The genus
Coilostigmd in Bothalia 17,2: 167, the variety tenui-
folium was published as a new combination without the
citation of the basionym which was inadvertently left
out in the editorial process. This is now rectified.
Coilostigma zeyherianum Klotzsch var. tenuifo-
lium (Klotzsch) E.G.H. Oliver, comb, et stat. nov.
Coilostigma tenuifolium Klotzsch in Linnaea 12: 234 (1838).
Types: In planitie inter ‘Krakakamma’ et montes ‘Vanstadens-
riviersberge’, Ecklon & Zeyher s.n. (Bt, E!, S!); idem as 294
(G!, GOET!, LD!, M!, MEL!, MO!, S!, W!, UPS!, Z!); in sylvis
‘Olifantshoek’ prope flumen ‘Bosjesmansrivier’, Ecklon & Zeyher
s.n. (Bt, BOL!). Lectotype (chosen here): Ecklon & Zeyher s.n.
(S).
E.G.H. OLIVER
186
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
GERANIACEAE
THE CORRECT AUTHOR CITATION FOR PELARGONIUM SECTION OTIDIA
In the most recent taxonomic treatment of the genus
Pelargonium, Knuth (1912: 369) cited the authority of
the section Otidia as (Lindl.) Harv. (1860), based on the
genus Otidia Lindl. ex Sweet. This is not correct.
The name Otidia was first published, in generic rank,
by Sweet (1820: viii), without any mention of Lindley.
Later in the same work, under t. 98 Sweet stated: ‘This
plant [Otidia carnosa] is proposed by Mr Lindley to form
a distinct genus, which we have adopted ...’. In my opinion
Sweet is the undoubted author of the genus, and ‘Lindl.
ex’ should be omitted from the citation as Lindley was
not mentioned in connection with the original publica-
tion of the name.
Furthermore, Harvey (1860: 278) was not the first
author to place Otidia in sectional rank, being preceded
by G. Don (1831: 729). Don did not cite the generic
name Otidia as basionym, but by citing ‘Lindl. in Sweet,
ger. p. 8 no. 98’ he provided an adequate reference to
the validly published basionym. Although this reference
is not entirely direct, it is not contrary to I.C.B.N. Art.
33.2 which only concerns publications later than 1 Jan.
1953. (A change in rank is considered to be a different
combination and there is not a separate clause to cover
changes in ranking).
The correct author citation therefore is Pelargonium
sect. Otidia (Sweet) G. Don.
REFERENCES
DON, G. 1831. A general system of gardening and botany, Vol.
1. Rivington, London.
HARVEY, W.H. 1860. Pelargonium. In W.H. Harvey & O. Son-
der, Flora capensis 1: 259-308 (278). Hodges & Smith,
Dublin.
KNUTH, R. 1912. Pelargonium. In A. Engler, Das Pflanzenreich
4, 129, 53: 316-545 (369). Engelmann, Berlin.
SWEET, R. 1820. Geraniaceae, Vol. 1. Ridgway, London.
P. VORSTER*
* Botany Department, University of Stellenbosch, Stellen-
bosch 7600, South Africa.
MS. received: 1987.08.22.
ORCHIDACEAE
ADDITIONS TO THE SYNONYMY OF EULOPHIA SCHWEINFURTHII
For some time doubt has existed as to the precise
nature of Eulophia chrysops Summerh., particularly
with regard to its alliance with a species recognized as
occurring in southern Africa, E. schweinfurthii Kraenzl.
(Kraenzlin 1893; Summerhayes 1958; Hall 1965).
Both these concepts have wide distributions in tropi-
cal Africa, extending marginally into the Transvaal (E.
schweinfurthii) and in recent records, into Botswana
(E. chrysops ). Summerhayes (1958) proposed E. chrysops
as a new name for Lissochilus aurantiacus Reichb. f.
(1865), E. aurantiaca having been used previously for
another species, related to E. welwitschii (Reichb. f.)
Rolfe. Summerhayes also reduced two tropical species,
L. johnstonii Rolfe and L. holubii Rolfe to the synonymy
of E. chrysops.
In discussing E. chrysops, Summerhayes (1958) noted
at the time that more data and material were needed to
elucidate its relationships. The specimens that he had
seen suggested that the flowers of E. chrysops were ap-
preciably larger (petals 13—16 mm long) than those of
E. schweinfurthii and that they have less acute sepals
with more narrow bases. Subsequent examination of
material has shown that these distinctions do not hold,
either for the sepal shapes or for the flower sizes. Petal
length varies from 8— 14(— 16) mm in E. schweinfurthii,
covering the range given by Summerhayes fori?. chrysops.
Some of the variation in flower size may be related to
the habitats which vary from arid mopane woodland to
wet bog verges (Williamson 1977) and to dry bushveld
and grassland (Hall 1965). The overall evidence of con-
tinuity shows convincingly that the two concepts should
be merged.
The name of the joint concept should be E. schwein-
furthii Kraenzl. (1893) which, being earlier, replaces
Summerhayes’ E. chrysops (1958) as the nomen novum
for L. aurantiacus Reichb. f. (1865). Further accretions
to this concept are likely to become evident in studies of
material of other tropical allies but none appear to have
been described earlier than E. schweinfurthii.
REFERENCES
HALL, A.V. 1965. Studies of the South African species of
Eulophia. Journal of South African Botany Supplemen-
tary Vol. 5: 1-248.
KRAENZLIN, F. 1893. Orchidaceae africanae. Botanische Jahr-
biicher 17: 54.
REICHENBACH, G.L. 1865. Dr. Welwitsch’s Orchideen aus
Angola. Flora 48: 177-191.
SUMMERHAYES, V.S. 1958. African orchids, 25. Kew Bulle-
tin 1958: 57-87.
WILLIAMSON, G. 1977. The orchids of South Central Africa,
pp. 237. Dent, London.
A.V. HALL*
* Bolus Herbarium, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700.
MS. received: April 1988.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
POLYGONACEAE
REINSTATEMENT OF OXYGONUM ACETOSELLA WELW.
187
R.A. Graham in his revision of Oxygonum in Kew
Bulletin 1957: 165 (1957), places Oxygonum acetosella
Welw. as a synonym of Oxygonum alatum Burch, because
they are similar in their winged fruits and lobed leaves.
On closer investigation it is found that O. acetosella dif-
fers from O. alatum by the total absence of cup-shaped
and elongated scales scattered over the entire surface of
the plant, the shallowly lobed leaves and the entire ocreae,
which are always fringed in the latter. Figure 5 repre-
sents a scatter diagram, using internode length along one
axis and width of leaves along the other axis, which
clearly separates the two taxa.
3a
O. acetosella Welw. in Transactions of the Linnean
Society of London 27: 60 (1869); Hiern: 903 (1900);
Bak. & C.H. Wr.: 99 (1909); Gossweiler: 395 (1953).
Type: Angola, Mossamedes, Welwitsch 1757 (BM iso.; K;
PRE!). Figure 6.
A glabrous, somewhat fleshy, glaucous, decumbent or
prostrate annual herb, much branched from the base.
FIGURE 5. — Scatter diagram illustrating the difference between
Oxygonum acetosella, •, and O. alatum, 6.
FIGURE 6. — Type of Oxygonum
acetosella Welw.
r
Oxygonum acetosella Welw.
FACULDADE° DC "-r An9°'- "' 17571
Oxygonum acetosella Welw.
Estafao Angola: Mossamedes
Habitat
, Alt. .. Dat. VI-V1I-1859
Col. F.. Welwitsch N* 1757
Del. Obs.
188
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
Stems semicylindrical, glabrous, up to 200 mm long.
Ocrea truncate, up to 8 mm long, quite entire or minute-
ly erose-denticulate, with a green leaf-like limb up to 3
mm long. Leaves broadly lanceolate to ovate, simple or
shallowly 2-3-lobed, (30-)39-56(-60) x (9-)12-22
(—27) mm, acute at the apex, narrowed into the winged
petiole, fleshy, glabrous. Inflorescence a small thyrse
with fascicles of up to 3 flowers in the axils of ovate
membranous bracts. Flowers bisexual. Perianth segments
5, obovate, 5—6 mm long, white. Stamens 8; anthers
pale blue, up to 1 mm long; filaments 2, 5-4,0 mm long
with a ring of cilia one-eighth from base. Styles 3, joined
for almost half their length, up to 5 mm long. Fruit ob-
long, up to 10 mm long, with 3 narrow wings.
Found on grassy flats and sandy hills in northern
South West Africa/Namibia. Figure 7.
Vouchers: Giess 7954 (PRE, WIND); Moss & Jacobsen
K299 (PRE).
REFERENCES
BAKER, J.G. & WRIGHT, C.H. 1909. Polygonaceae. In W.T.
Thiselton-Dyei, Flora of tropical Africa 6,1: 99. Reeve,
Kent.
GOSSWEILER, J. 1953. Nomes indigenas de plantas de Angola'.
395. Luanda.
GRAHAM, R.A. 1957. A revision of Oxygonum. Kew Bulletin
1: 165.
FIGURE 7. — Distribution of Oxygonum acetosella Welw. in
South West Africa/Namibia.
HIERN, W.P. 1900. Polygonaceae. Catalogue of the African
plants collected by Dr Friedrich Welwitsch in 1853-1861 :
903. London.
WELWITSCH, F. 1869. Polygonaceae. Transactions of the Lin-
nean Society of London 27 : 60. London.
G. GERMISHUIZEN
MS. received: Feb. 1988.
Bothalia 18,2: 189-194 (1988)
Fusarium tricinctum (Fungi : Hyphomycetes) in South Africa —
morphology and pathogenicity*
SANDRA C. LAMPRECHT,** W.F.O. MARASAS,1- P.S. VAN WYK,* and P.S. KNOX-DAVIES0
Keywords.' Fusarium tricinctum, Medicago truncatula, morphology, pathogenicity, soil, South Africa, taxonomy, Triticum aestivum
ABSTRACT
The occurrence, cultural characteristics, morphology and pathogenicity of seven isolates of Fusarium tricinc-
tum (Corda) Saccardo, are described. Cultures were isolated from plant debris in soils under natural grassland in
the Golden Gate National Park, Orange Free State, and under either wheat or annual Medicago spp. at Malmesbury,
Cape Province. One isolate was obtained from roots of a Medicago sp. at Caledon, Cape Province. The isolates
were identical to each other and to two foreign reference cultures of F. tricinctum and all produced napiform
to citriform microconidia on monophialides. All the isolates were weak to intermediately aggressive pathogens
of Medicago truncatula Gaertn. cv. Jemalong and Triticum aestivum L. cv. Palmiet and caused pre- and post-
emergence damping-off of seedlings as well as discolouration and necrosis of root and crown tissues. This is the
first report of the pathogenicity of F. tricinctum to M. truncatula.
UITTREKSEL
Die voorkoms, kultuureienskappe, morfologie en patogeniteit van sewe isolate van Fusarium tricinctum
(Corda) Saccardo, word beskryf. Kulture is uit plantreste in gronde onder natuurlike grasveld in die Golden
Gate Nasionale Park, Oranje-Vrystaat, en onder of koring of eenjarige Medicago spp. in Malmesbury, Kaap-
provinsie, gei'soleer. Een isolaat is verkry vanuit wortels van ’n eenjarige Medicago sp. te Caledon, Kaapprovin-
sie. Die isolate was identies aan meekaar en aan twee buitelandse verwysingskulture van F. tricinctum en almal
het napiforme tot sitriforme mikrokonidia op monofialides geproduseer. A1 die isolate was swak tot middelmatig
aggressiewe patogene van Medicago truncatula Gaertn. cv. Jemalong en Triticum aestivum L. cv. Palmiet en het
voor- en na-opkomsafsterwing van saailinge sowel as verkleuring en nekrose van wortel- en kroonweefsel veroor-
saak. Hierdie is die eerste aanmelding van die patogeniteit van F. tricinctum teenoor M. truncatula.
INTRODUCTION
Four species are currently accepted in the section
Sporotrichiella of the genus Fusarium Link, i.e. F. poae
(Peck) Wollenw., F. tricinctum (Corda) Sacc., F. sporo-
trichioides Sherb., and F. chlamydosporum Wollenw. &
Reinking (Nelson et al. 1983). Reports in the literature
on the occurrence, geographical distribution and patho-
genicity of these Fusarium species are for the most part
unreliable because of the use of the name F. tricinctum
Corda emend. Snyd. & Hans. (Snyder & Hansen 1945)
which encompasses all four of these species. However,
there is considerable evidence that F. tricinctum sensu
stricto is relatively widespread, but usually at low fre-
quencies, in soils and in association with cereals, includ-
ing wheat, oats, barley and maize, grasses and a number
of other hosts in Europe (Wollenweber & Reinking
1935; Jamalainen 1955; Seemuller 1968; Booth 1971;
Marasas et al. 1979; Domsch et al. 1980; Nirenberg
1981; Ylimaki 1981; Gerlach & Nirenberg 1982; Chel-
kowski et al. 1984) and North America (El-Gholl et al.
1978; Kane et al. 1987). Although F. tricinctum appears
to be relatively common in cold temperate areas of
* Part of a Ph.D. Agric. thesis to be submitted by the first author
to the University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch.
** Plant Protection Research Institute, Private Bag X5017, Stel-
lenbosch 7600.
t South African Medical Research Council, P.O. Box 70, Tyger-
berg 7505.
* Department Plant Pathology, University of the Orange Free
State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300.
□ Department of Plant Pathology, University of Stellenbosch,
Stellenbosch 7600.
MS. received: 1987.07.02.
northern Europe, particularly in Finland (Jamalainen
1955; Uoti & Ylimaki 1974; Uoti 1976; Ylimaki
1981), this fungus has also been isolated in Florida in
the USA (El-Gholl et al. 1978). The isolates from leaf-
spots on Hedera helix L. in Florida are the only ones
that have been found to produce the teleomorph ( Gibbe -
rella tricincta El-Gholl, McRitchie, Schoulties & Ridings)
in compatible crosses (El-Gholl et al. 1978, 1979; Cullen
et al. 1983). A dried culture (DAOM 194693) obtained
from CBS 449.67 which was isolated from Calamagros-
tis epigeios (L.). Roth in Berlin, Germany by Seemuller
(1968), has been designated as the neotype for F. tricinc-
tum (Neish 1987).
Two species of the section Sporotrichiella, i.e. F.
poae and F. chlamydosporum are relatively common in
South Africa (Doidge 1938; Doidge 1950; Marasas et
al. 1987). During a recent survey of Fusarium species
in South African soils, three isolates of F. tricinctum
were obtained from Golden Gate National Park (Mara-
sas et al. 1988). These isolates represented the first
record of the occurrence of F. tricinctum in South Africa.
There are also no other authenticated records of this
fungus from the continent of Africa. Subsequently four
additional isolates were obtained. The occurrence, cul-
tural characteristics, morphology and pathogenicity of
these South African isolates of F. tricinctum are describ-
ed and compared with two foreign reference cultures in
this paper.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fusarium cultures
The sources of seven South African and two foreign
isolates of F. tricinctum are given in Table 1. All cultures
190
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
TABLE 1. — Sources of Fusarium tricinctum cultures
* Accession numbers of lyophilised cultures in the collection of the South African Medical Research Council (MRC), Tygerberg,
South Africa.
were initiated from single conidia, lyophilised (Nelson et
al. 1983) and deposited in the culture collection of the
South African Medical Research Council (MRC), P.O.
Box 70, Tygerberg, South Africa. The two foreign refer-
ence cultures were supplied by Dr W. Gerlach, Biologische
Bundesanstalt fur Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Berlin,
Federal Republic of Germany (MRC 1799), and Dr N.E.
El-Gholl, Department of Agriculture, Gainesville, Florida,
USA (MRC 1574). Three isolates from soil debris in
Golden Gate National Park were obtained during a survey
of Fusarium species in South African soils (Marasas et al.
1988). Three additional isolates from soil debris at Lang-
gewens, Malmesbury were obtained by methods identical
to those described by Marasas et al. (1988). A culture
from roots of an annual Medicago sp. (medic) was isolat-
ed as described by Lamprecht etal. (1984).
Cultural and morphological characteristics of all FI tri-
cinctum isolates were determined by incubating cultures
on potato-dextrose agar (PDA, Difco) at 25° C in the
dark and on carnation-leaf agar (CLA, Fisher et al. 1982)
at 20° C under a mixture of white fluorescent and near-
ultraviolet light with a 12 h photoperiod (Nelson et al.
1983). Colony diameters of single-conidial cultures on
PDA incubated in the dark at 25° and 30° C were measured
after 72 h (Burgess & Liddell 1983). Morphological struc-
tures were examined, measured and photographed under
a light microscope.
Culture material for scanning electron microscopy
(SEM) was fixed in 1,5% glutaraldehyde in 0,1 M phos-
phate buffer for 24 h followed by 1 % osmium tetroxide
for 2 h, dehydrated in a graded acetone series, critical
point dried, coated with gold/palladium, and viewed
with an IS1 scanning electron microscope.
Pathogenicity tests
The nine F. tricinctum isolates were tested for patho-
genicity to medics ( Medicago truncatula Gaertn. cv. Jema-
long) and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Palmiet) by
means of seed inoculation and soil infestation techniques
described by Lamprecht et al. (1984) and Lamprecht
(1986). In the case of seed inoculation, discs 4 mm diam.,
from 10-d-old water agar (WA, Difco) cultures of each
F. tricinctum isolate, were buried 10 mm deep in steam-
treated soil. Medic seeds, but not the wheat seeds, were
treated with water at 50° C for 30 min. prior to planting.
Six seeds were planted in contact with each disc and
covered with steam- treated soil. There were 60 seeds
per plastic pot (125 mm) and three pots per treatment.
Control seeds were planted in contact with uninoculated
discs. Pots were randomized in a growth chamber at
20° to 22° C. Seedling emergence and damping-off were
followed and recorded after 14 d. Data were analysed by
a one-way analysis of variance and means were compared
using Tukey’s least significant difference (LSD) at the
5% level.
In the case of soil infestation, inoculum of each isolate
of F. tricinctum on a mixture of sand (200 g), bran (10
g) and water (30 ml) was mixed with steam-treated soil
(2,5% , w/w) in 175 mm plastic pots. Control pots con-
tained uninoculated, autoclaved sand-bran mixture. Six-
ty seeds were planted in each pot and there were three
pots per treatment. Pots were randomized and held in a
glasshouse at 15° to 30° C. After six weeks the plants
were removed and disease severity of 10 randomly select-
ed plants per pot scored on a scale from 0 to 5 based on
Bretag (1985) for medics and Kane et al. (1987) for
wheat as follows:
Medics: 0, no visible discolouration of lateral and tap
roots; 1 , slight discolouration of lateral roots, no dis-
colouration of tap root; 2, lateral roots discoloured
brown with lesions, slight discolouration of tap root;
3, necrotic lesions (1 to 5 mm long) on tap root; 4,
necrotic lesions (>5 mm long) on tap root; 5, tap
root completely rotted, plant dead.
Wheat: 0, no visible discolouration of lateral roots and
crown tissue; 1, discolouration of roots and scutellar
node; 2, necrotic lesions on roots and scutellar node;
3, necrotic lesions on roots, scutellar node and sub-
crown intemode, with discolouration extending to
the crown; 4, necrosis of scutellar node and subcrown
intemode with more extensive discolouration of the
crown; 5, extensive necrosis of the crown and stem
base, plant dead.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
191
9
e
A
FIGURE 1. — Fusarium tricinctum,
X 710. A, spindle-shaped
and napiform to citriform
micioconidia (MRC 4521);
B, napiform to citriform
microconidia (MRC 4520);
C, spindle-shaped and napi-
form microconidia (MRC
4520); D, monophialide
(MRC 4521); E-F, termi-
nal and intercalary chlamy-
dospores (MRC 4520).
The statistical significance of disease severity indices
was determined by the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis
of variance followed by Tukey’s LSD at the 5% level
based on rank averages.
Isolations were made from diseased tissues of re-
presentative plants of both hosts inoculated by both
methods.
RESULTS
Seven isolates of F. tricinctum from three localities in
South Africa (Table 1), were examined. These isolates
were found to be identical to each other and to two
foreign reference cultures of F. tricinctum. The cultural
and morphological characteristics of the South African
isolates of F. tricinctum are described and illustrated
below.
Fusarium tricinctum (Cor da) Saccardo, Sylloge
Fungorum 4: 700 (1886).
See SeemUller (1968), Gerlach & Nirenberg (1982), Nelson
et al. (1983) and Neish (1987) for synonymy.
Colony diameters of single -conidial cultures on PDA
after dark incubation for 3 d are 25—30 mm at 25° C and
12—17 mm at 30° C. Colonies are densely floccose with
irregular margins, pink to carmine red with the reverse
carmine red. Microconidia (Figure 1 A,B,C) are produced
in false heads on monophialides which are formed laterally
on the aerial mycelium or on branched conidiophores,
hyaline, cylindrical and tapered towards the apex (Fig-
ures ID; 3B). Microconidia on PDA and CLA are hyaline,
0— 1-septate, and of two distinct types: fusiform micro-
conidia which are usually produced first (within 14 d)
and abundantly, 10-17 x 3,0— 3,5 /um (Figure 1A, C),
and napiform to citriform microconidia which are pro-
duced later (after 21 d or longer) and sparingly in some
strains, 9—15 x 4—7 jum (Figures 1A, B, C; 3C). Macro-
conidia are produced in orange sporodochia on CLA
after 21 d or longer and are falcate to lunate, with a
pedicellate basal cell and tapered apical cell, 3-5-septate,
25-60 x 3, 0-4, 5 jam (Figures 2A, B, C, D; 3A). Chlamy-
dospores are produced on PDA or CLA after 21 d or
longer, terminal or intercalary, hyaline to pale brown,
smooth to rough-walled, produced singly or in chains
or clumps in the aerial and submerged hyphae, 8—15 jam
diam. (Figures IE, F; 3D).
All nine isolates of F. tricinctum exhibited some de-
gree of pathogenicity to M. truncatula cv. Jemalong as
well as wheat cv. Palmiet (Tables 2 & 3). This fungus
was re-isolated from diseased tissue of inoculated plants
of both hosts, but not from controls. Most isolates were
more pathogenic to M. truncatula than to wheat with
respect to pre- and post-emergence damping-off (Table
2) as well as the severity of root discolouration and ne-
crosis (Table 3). Disease severity indices in medics and
wheat were, however, significantly correlated (r = 0,99,
p <0,05). Isolates from different sources in South Africa
were all weakly to moderately aggressive pathogens and
did not differ much in aggressiveness to either host with
respect to damping-off of seedlings (Table 2). However,
some isolates were significantly (p = 0,05) more aggres-
sive than others with respect to disease severity indices
in medics as well as wheat (Table 3), e.g. isolate MRC
3518 from natural grassland soil at Golden Gate was
significantly more aggressive to both hosts than all other
isolates.
192 Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
TABLE 2. — Pre- and post-emergence damping-off of seedlings of Medicago truncatula cv. Jemalong and Triticum aestivum cv. Palmiet
after seed inoculation with different isolates of Fusarium tricinctum
F. tricinctum Damping-off of seedlings (% )*
isolate
No. (MRC) Medicago truncatula Triticum aestivum
* Each figure based on 1 80 seeds planted per treatment. Means in each column followed by the same letter do not differ significant-
ly (p =0,05).
FIGURE 2. — Macroconidia of Fli-
sarium tricinctum, X 715.
A & B, MRC 3908; C& D,
MRC 4520.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
193
FIGURE 3. — Scanning electron-
micrographs of Fusarium
tricinctum. A, macroconi-
dia (MRC 4521), X 1430;
B, monophialides and napi-
form to citriform microco-
nidia (MRC 4521), X 2860;
C, napiform to citriform
microconidia (MRC 4520),
X 1430; D, chlamydospo-
res (MRC 4521), X 1790.
DISCUSSION
The cultural and morphological characteristics of
South African isolates of F. tricinctum were found to be
identical to those of two reference cultures and to agree
with previous descriptions of F. tricinctum (Wollenweber
& Reinking 1935; Booth 1971; Gerlach & Nirenberg
1982; Nelson et al. 1983). The most diagnostic character-
istic of F. tricinctum is the production of napiform to
citriform microconidia on monophialides. It should be
TABLE 3. — Disease development in Medicago truncatula cv.
Jemalong and Triticum aestivum cv. Palmiet plants ex-
posed to soil inoculum of different isolates of Fusarium
tricinctum
F. tricinctum Disease severity index*
isolate
No. (MRC) Medicago truncatula Triticum aestivum
* Each figure represents the mean of 30 plants per treatment.
See Materials and methods for disease severity rating scale.
Means within each column followed by the same letter do not
differ significantly (p =0,05).
noted, however, that these characteristic microconidia
are usually not present in cultures before they are 21 d
old or older, and that they are produced sparingly by
some isolates. In the absence of these microconidia, cul-
tures of F. tricinctum can easily be misidentified as either
F. acuminatum Ell & Ev. or F. reticulatum Mont.
South African isolates of F. tricinctum proved to be
pathogenic to medic as well as wheat seedlings. This is
the first report of the pathogenicity of F. tricinctum to
an annual Medicago sp. (M. truncatula). Isolates of F. tri-
cinctum were weak to moderately aggressive pathogens
of M. truncatula, compared with F avenaceum (Fr.)
Sacc. (Lamprecht et al. 1984; Bretag 1985), and of
wheat, compared with F. graminearum Schwabe Group
1, F. culmorum (W.G. Smith) Sacc. and F. crookwellense
Burgess, Nelson & Toussoun (Van Wyk et al. 1987).
The present results with respect to the pathogenicity to
wheat are in agreement with previous findings (Seemiil-
ler 1968; Uoti 1976; Kane et al. 1987), except that
Seemtiller (1968) found F. tricinctum to be strongly
pathogenic to wheat and to cause damping-off of seed-
lings as well as foot and root rot.
Fusarium tricinctum was not recorded in surveys of
Fusarium species from diseased medics (Lamprecht et al.
1984) and wheat (Van Wyk et al. 1987) in South Africa.
In a recent survey of Fusarium species in South African
soils (Marasas et al. 1988), F. tricinctum was isolated
from one out of 29 soil samples, and only three isolates
of this species out of a total of 2 425 Fusarium isolates
were obtained. On the basis of the available evidence, it
appears that F. tricinctum is a rare fungus in South Africa
194
and is probably not involved as a major pathogen in the
root and crown rot complex of either medics or wheat
in this country. However, in view of the taxonomic con-
fusion surrounding F. tricinctum, the possibility of mis-
identification, and the demonstrated pathogenic poten-
tial of South African isolates of this fungus, researchers
should be aware of the occurrence, distinguishing charac-
teristics, and potential importance of this fungus in South
Africa.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank F.J. Calitz of the Biometry Section, Fruit
and Fruit Technology Research Institute, Stellenbosch
for statistical analyses and A.C. Jaap and M.E. Holtz-
hausen of the Plant Protection Research Institute,
Stellenbosch for competent technical assistance.
REFERENCES
BOOTH, C. 1971. The genus Fusarium. Commonwealth Myco-
logical Institute, Kew, England.
BRETAG, T.W. 1985. Fungi associated with root rots of annual
Medicago spp. in Australia. Transactions of the British
Mycological Society 85: 329-334.
BURGESS, L.W. & LIDDELL, C.M. 1983. Laboratory manual
for Fusarium research. Department of Plant Pathology and
Agricultural Entomology, University of Sydney, Sydney.
CHELKOWSKI, J„ VISCONTI, A., SOLFRIZZO, M. & BOT-
TALICO, A. 1984. Formation of mycotoxins by Fusarium
species from cereals in Poland. Phytopathologia Mediter-
ranea 23: 43-46.
CULLEN, D., SMALLEY, E.B. & DIMOND, R.L. 1983. Hetero-
karyosis in Fusarium tricinctum and F. sporotrichioides.
Journal of General Microbiology 129: 3035-3041.
DOIDGE, E.M. 1938. Some South African Fusaria. Bothalia
3: 331-483.
DOIDGE, E.M. 1950. The South African fungi and lichens to
the end of 1945. Bothalia 5: 1-1094.
DOMSCH, K.H., GAMS, W. & ANDERSON, T.H. 1980. Com-
pendium of soil fungi. Vol. 1. Academic Press, London.
EL-GHOLL, N.E., MCRITCHIE, J.J, SCHOULTIES, C.L. &
RIDINGS, W.H. 1978. The identification, induction of
perithecia, and pathogenicity of Gibberella ( Fusarium )
tricincta n. sp. Canadian Journal of Botany 56: 2203-
2206.
EL-GHOLL, N.E., SCHOULTIES, C.L. & RIDINGS, W.H. 1979.
Factors affecting perithecial production in Gibberella (Fu-
sarium) tricincta. Canadian Journal of Botany 57: 2497-
2500.
FISHER, N.L., BURGESS, L.W., TOUSSOUN, T.A. & NELSON,
P.E., 1982. Carnation leaves as a substrate and for preserv-
ing cultures of Fusarium species. Phytopathology 72:
151-153.
GERLACH, W. & NIRENBERG, H. 1982. The genus Fusarium
— a pictorial atlas. Mitteilungen aus der Biologischen Bun-
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
desanstalt fur Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Berlin-Dahlem
209: 1-406.
JAMALAINEN, E.A. 1955. Fusarium species causing plant
diseases in Finland. Acta Agricultura Fennica 83: 159-
172.
KANE, R.T., SMILEY, R.W. & SORRELLS, M.E. 1987. Rela-
tive pathogenicity of selected Fusarium species and Micro-
dochium bolleyi to winter wheat in New York. Plant Disease
71: 177-181.
LAMPRECHT, S.C. 1986. A new disease of Medicago truncatula
caused by Cylindrocladium scoparium. Phytophylactica 18:
111-114.
LAMPRECHT, S.C., KNOX-DAVIES, P.S. & MARASAS, W.F.O.
1984. Fusarium spp. associated with diseased root and
crown tissue of annual Medicago spp. Phytophylactica 16:
195-200.
MARASAS, W.F.O. , LEISTNER, L., HOFMANN, G. & ECK ARDT,
C. 1979. Occurrence of toxigenic strains of Fusarium in
maize and barley in Germany. European Journal of Applied
Microbiology and Biotechnology 7: 289-305.
MARASAS, W.F.O., LAMPRECHT, S.C., VAN WYK, P.S. &
ANELICH, R.Y. 1987. Bibliography of Fusarium (Fungi :
Hyphomycetes) in South Africa, 1945-1985. Bothalia 17:
97-104.
MARASAS, W.F.O., BURGESS, L.W., ANELICH, R.Y., LAM-
PRECHT, S.C. & VAN SCHALKWYK, D.J. 1988. Survey
of Fusarium species associated with plant debris in South
African soil. South African Journal of Botany 54: 63-71.
NEISH, G.A. 1987. Neotypification of Fusarium tricinctum.
Canadian Journal of Botany 65: 589-591.
NELSON, P.E., TOUSSOUN, T.A. & MARASAS, W.F.O. 1983.
Fusarium species. An illustrated manual for identification.
Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.
NIRENBERG, H. 1981. A simplified method for identifying
Fusarium spp. occurring on wheat. Canadian Journal of
Botany 59:1599-1609.
SEEMULLER, E. 1968. Untersuchungen iiber die morphologische
und biologische Differenzierung in der Fusarium Sektion
Sporotrichiella. Mitteilungen aus der Biologischen Bundes-
anstalt fur Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Berlin-Dahlem 127:
1-93.
SNYDER, W.C. & HANSEN, H.N. 1945. The species concept in
Fusarium with reference to Discolor and other sections.
American Journal of Botany 32: 657-666.
UOTI, J. 1976. The effect of five Fusarium species on the growth
and development of spring wheat and barley. Annales Agri-
culture Fenniae 15: 254-262.
UOTI, J. & YLIMAKI, A. 1974. The occurrence of Fusarium
species in cereal grain in Finland. Annales Agriculturae Fen-
niae 13: 5-17.
VAN WYK, P.S., LOS, O., PAUER, G.D.C. & MARASAS, W.F.O.
1987. Geographic distribution and pathogenicity of Fusa-
rium species associated with crown rot of wheat in the
Orange Free State, South Africa. Phytophylactica 19: 27 1 —
274.
WOLLENWEBER, H.W. & REINKING, O.A. 1935. DieFusarien.
Ihre Beschreibung, Schadwirkung und Bekampfung. Paul
Parey, Berlin.
YLIMAKI, A. 1981. The mycoflora of cereal seeds and some
feedstuffs. Annales Agriculturae Fenniae 20: 74-88.
Bothalia 18,2: 195-209 (1988)
Leaf anatomy of the South African Danthonieae (Poaceae). XVII. The
genus Chaetobromus
R.P. ELLIS*
Keywords: Chaetobromus, Danthonieae, leaf anatomy, Poaceae
ABSTRACT
The leaf anatomy of Chaetobromus Nees is described and illustrated. The genus has non-Kranz anatomy but
with a low lateral cell count. The abaxial epidermis is not pooid as microhairs are present, the silica bodies are
dumbbell-shaped and the stomatal subsidiaries are dome-shaped. From the sample of 33 randomly selected speci-
mens from throughout the distribution range of the genus it was possible to identify four anatomical groups,
each associated with a specific habitat and differing in vegetative morphology. These intergrade in a reticulate
pattern and do not constitute discrete entities. It appears that the genus is monospecific with four poorly separated
subspecific taxa.
UITTREKSEL
Die blaaranatomie van Chaetobromus Nees word beskryf en geillustreer. Die genus het nie-Kranzanatomie
maar met ’n lae laterale seltelling. Die abaksiale epidermis is nie pooied nie aangesien mikrohare aanwesig is, die
silikaliggame murgbeenvormig en die hulpselle van die huidmondjies koepelvormig is. Uit ’n monster van 33 ek-
semplare wat willekeurig vanuit die hele verspreidingsgebied van die genus gekies is, kon vier anatomiese groepe
geidentifiseer word, elk met ’n spesifleke habitat geassosieer, en verskillend wat vegetatiewe morfologie betref.
Hierdie groepe vloei ineen in ’n netvormige patroon en vorm nie afsonderlike entiteite nie. Dit blyk dat die genus
monospesifiek is met vier swak omgrensende subspesifieke taksons.
INTRODUCTION
Chaetobromus Nees is a small genus in which four
closely allied species have been described. However, they
are very difficult to distinguish from one another and
must be regarded as provisional until the genus has been
studied in greater detail. Nowadays only three specific
names are generally accepted (Clayton & Renvoize
1986). These are C. dregeanus Nees, C. involucratus
(Schrad.) Nees and C. schraderi Stapf. The name C.
schlechteri Stapf, that of the fourth species described,
has fallen into disuse although it is correct (Smook &
Gibbs Russell 1985). Chippindall (1955) does not con-
sider C. schlechteri to be distinct from C. dregeanus.
Chaetobromus is indigenous to southern Africa with
the centre of distribution in the western Cape, Namaqua-
land and southern South West Africa/Namibia. The genus
occurs mainly in the Strandveld, the Namaqualand Coast
Belt of the Succulent Karoo and the Namaqualand Broken
Veld (Acocks 1975). All these veld types are at low al-
titudes, with sandy soil and with winter rainfall decreas-
ing northwards. It is also occasionally found further
south in the southern Strandveld as far south as Table
Bay. It is of interest that Chaetobromus also occurs at
higher altitudes in the Western Mountain Karoo from
Loeriesfontein southwards to Sutherland. It is rare in
this latter veld type but this appears to be due to over-
grazing.
The leaf anatomy of Chaetobromus has received little
attention in the literature. De Wet (1956) reported that
* Botanical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and
Water Supply, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001.
MS. received: 1987.10.20.
the epidermis is panicoid, with linear microhairs and
dumbbell-shaped silica bodies, and the mesophyll is
‘festucoid’ with a poorly differentiated outer bundle
sheath and uniformly distributed chlorenchyma. Watson
et al. (1986) give further anatomical details. They con-
sider the silica bodies to be intermediate between the
panicoid and the pooid type. Stomata are present with
guard cells flush or overlapping the interstomatals and
the subsidiary cells are either parallel-sided or low dome-
shaped — either panicoid or pooid. These authors also
did not observe abaxial microhairs. They consider the
genus to be C3 although the lateral cell count is rather
low. The midrib is structurally indistinguishable from
the other larger bundles. All bundles have wide adaxial
bundle sheath extensions. The bulliform cells occur in
very large, simple, fan-shaped groups without associated
colourless cells. The present paper will describe and il-
lustrate the anatomy of the genus based on a representa-
tive sample and will compare this anatomy with the
findings of the above authors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Leaf blade segments of Chaetobromus plants were
freshly fixed in the field in FAA (Johansen 1940). Her-
barium voucher specimens from the same plants were
taken for determination by the National Herbarium
(PRE) where they are housed.
Leaf transverse sections, 10 nm thick, were prepared
after desilicification in hydrofluoric acid (Breakwell
1914), dehydration using the method of Feder& O’Brien
(1968) and embedding in Tissue Prep (Fischer Scientific).
These sections were stained in safranin and fast green
(Johansen 1940). The manual scraping method of Met-
calfe (1960) was used to prepare scrapes of the abaxial
196
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
FIGURE 1. — Leaf blade anatomy of Chaetobromus specimens representative of Group 1 as seen in transverse section. A, outline
showing sectioned macrohairs, Ellis 2182, X 100. B, slightly inrolled outline, Ellis 2187, X 100. C-D, Ellis 2184: C, leaf
• outline, X 100; D, anatomical detail of chlorenchyma and vascular bundles with abaxial macrohairs, X 250. E-F, Ellis
21 76: E, outline of margin, X 100; F, detail of chlorenchyma with low lateral cell count, X 250.
leaf epidermis. The anatomical structure was recorded
photographically using a Reicherdt Univar microscope
and Ilford Pan F Film (50 ASA).
The standardized terminology of Ellis (1976, 1979)
was used for the anatomical descriptions. The following
abbreviations will be used in these descriptions:
vb/s — vascular bundle/s
l’vb/s — first order vascular bundle/s
2’vb/s — second order vascular bundle/s
3’vb/s — third order vascular bundle/s
ibs — inner bundle sheath; mestome sheath
obs — outer bundle sheath; parenchyma sheath
Identification of the voucher specimens to species
level proved to be very difficult and unsatisfactory. This
is understandable as the genus is in need of revision
(Chippindall 1955), the species concepts are vague, and
species are indistinct and intergrade, with many inter-
mediate specimens being present. It has, therefore, been
decided to consider this genus at the generic level only.
Separate descriptions of the species will not be given due
to uncertainty of the exact identity of a significant
proportion of the voucher specimens. The anatomical
description of the genus given is inclusive of the entire
sample of 33 specimens used in this study.
It was, nevertheless, possible to sort the material
studied into four informal groups using anatomical, eco-
logical and vegetative morphological criteria. These
informal groups appear to correspond reasonably well
with the species described in the genus and they will be
compared and contrasted in an attempt to ascertain
whether they represent distinct species. In the citation
of the specimens examined these informal groups are
used together with their probable specific equivalent.
Asterisks indicate cases where there is a discrepancy
between the herbarium determination (in brackets) and
the grouping used here.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
197
FIGURE 2. — Abaxial epidermal structure of Chaetobromus specimens of Group 1 as seen in surface view. A-B, Ellis 21 75; A,
macrohairs, many filled with air, X 160; B, detail of macrohair bases and silica bodies, X 250. C, pubescence of leaf sur-
face, phase contrast, Ellis 2187, X 100. D, macrohairs, silica bodies and intercostal microhairs, Ellis 2184, X 250.
Specimens examined
Group 1 . Chaetobromus involucratus
CAPE. — 2816 (Oranjemund): Richtersveld, Beesbank (-BC),
Ellis 50 71 ; Beauvallon (-DA), Ellis 21 75*, 21 76 * (C. schraderi).
2916 (Port Nolloth): Port Nolloth (-BD), Ellis 2182, 2183,
2184, 2185, 2187. 3017 (Hondeklipbaai): Hondeklip Bay (-AD),
Ellis 5344, 5345. 3217 (Vredenburg): St Helena Bay, Stompneus-
baai (-DB), Ellis 703* (C. schraderi).
Group 2. Chaetobromus schraderi
CAPE. — 2816 (Oranjemund): Richtersveld, Beesbank (-BC),
Ellis 5073. 2917 (Springbok); Steinkopf (-BD), Ellis 2164, 2165,
2166; Spektakelberg, Sandhoogte Pass (-DA), Ellis 2191, 2192,
2193, 2194. 3018 (Kamiesberg): 43 km N of Bitterfontein
(-CA), Ellis 1730* (C. dregeanus ); Bitterfontein (-CC ), Ellis
2206. 3118 (Van Rhynsdorp): 64 km N of Van Rhynsdorp
(-BC), Ellis 1 733* (C. dregeanus).
Group 3. Chaetobromus dregeanus (lowland form)
CAPE. — 3218 (Clanwilliam): Elands Bay (-AD), Ellis 1691.
3317 (Saldanha): Saldanha Bay (-BB), Ellis 1696. 3318 (Cape
Town): Yzerfontein (-AC), Ellis 692; Blouberg Strand (-CD),
Ellis 2357, 2358.
Group 4. Chaetobromus dregeanus (mountain form)
CAPE. — 3019 (Loeriesfontein): Loeriesfontein at junction
of Nieuwoudtville and Granaatboskolk roads (-CD), Ellis 2422;
103 km from Brandvlei on road to Loeriesfontein (-DC), Ellis
2423, 2424. 3118 (Van Rhynsdorp): 10 km S of Bitterfontein
(-AB), Ellis 2426. 3119 (Calvinia): Van Rhyns Pass (-AC),
Ellis 2457; Botterkloof Pass between Calvinia and Clanwilliam
(-CD), Ellis 2450. 3220 (Sutherland): Sutherland (-BC), Ellis
2467.
LEAF ANATOMY OF THE GENUS CHAETOBROMUS
Leaf in transverse section
Outline : open, expanded, flat (Figures 3A— C, 5A &
B) to slightly inrolled (Figures 1A— C, 5D) or narrow,
infolded (Figure 7A, C, G & H) or inrolled (Figure 7E);
leaf thickness 230—550 pm. Ribs and furrows : slight
(Figure 3 A— D) to medium (Figure 1A— F) rounded
adaxial ribs overlie l’vbs and 2’vbs; furrows shallow and
wide (Figure 3A-D) to narrow, cleft-like (Figure 7E
& F); furrows may be present over 3’vbs; slight abaxial
ribs and furrows sometimes present (Figures 1 A-F, 7H),
usually not developed. Median vascular bundle : not
structurally distinct from lateral l’vbs. Vascular bundle
arrangement ; tends to be variable and rather irregular
although a basic pattern is discernible; 5, 7, 9 or 1 1 l’vbs
in leaf section; one 2’vb between consecutive l’vbs al-
though this sometimes varies; one 3’vb between adjacent
l’vbs and 2’vbs but may be absent but then usually only
on one side of each 2’vb (Figures IF, 3E & 5C). All vbs
situated in centre of blade. Vascular bundle description;
l’vbs round to elliptical in shape; phloem adjoins ibs;
metaxylem vessels very narrow, diameters much less
than those of obs cells (Figures ID & F, 3D & F, 5E &
F); 2’vbs and 3’vbs round to elliptical; xylem and
phloem distinguishable. Vascular bundle sheaths; double;
obs round to elliptical; prominent adaxial and abaxial
multiseriate parenchymatous extensions extend to the
198
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
upper and lower epidermis from all l’vbs (Figures ID &
F, 3D & F, 5E & F, 7B, D & F); 2’vbs with narrower
adaxial extensions, being bi- or uniseriate; 3’vbs with
irregular extensions or extensions absent; obs cells in-
flated, round, the cells smaller than the mesophyll cells;
walls thin; either translucent, without chloroplasts
(Figures 3D & 7F) or with small chloroplasts, fewer than
in the chlorenchyma cells (Figures ID & F, 3E & F, 5C
& E); ibs entire, of small lignified cells, those opposite
the phloem with the inner tangential and radial walls
thickened (Figures 3D & 5C). Sclerenchyma: minute
adaxial and slightly larger abaxial strands associated with
the l’vbs and 2’vbs; no sclerenchyma adjacent to the
3’vbs; small sclerenchyma caps in the margins; cell walls
not lignified. Chlorenchyma: irregular (Figure 5E & F)
to tending to radiate condition (Figures ID & F, 2D— F);
more than one layer of radiating cells; lateral cell count
low, from 3—5 cells; continuous between bundles;
chlorenchyma cells large, angular and equidimensional
(Figure ID & F) to elongated (Figure 3D— F); often
nucleate and may be refractive under interference con-
trast (Figure 3F); no arm cells or fusoids; intercellular
air spaces large and frequent. Colourless cells: absent ex-
cept in the bundle sheath extensions. Adaxial epidermal
cells: small to medium-sized bulliform groups at bases
of furrows (Figures ID & E, 3D&F, 5E&F, 7F); occupy
less than V4 leaf thickness; central cell often largest and
may be shield-shaped; cuticle very thin; epidermal ap-
pendages usually absent but macrohairs (Figure lA)and
prickles (Figure 5E)may be present; no papillae. Abaxial
epidermal cells: bulliform cells absent; cuticle very thin
or slightly thickened; macrohairs present (Figure 1A, C
& D) or absent; no prickles or papillae.
Abaxial epidermis in surface view
Intercostal long cells: elongate rectangular (Figures
2B & D, 4C & E, 8F) or fusiform (Figures 4D, 6A— D,
8A— D); walls straight (Figures 2A-D, 4A— E) to slight-
ly sinuous (Figures 6A— F, 8A— F); cell shape and size
consistent across individual intercostal zones; long cells
adjoin one another or are separated by short cells; no
bulliform cells. Stomata: low dome-shaped (Figures 2B
& D, 4C & E) to dome-shaped (Figures 6B, D, F, 8A-F)
subsidiary cells; occurring throughout intercostal zones
FIGURE 3. — Transectional leaf anatomy of Group 2 representatives of Chaetobromus. A, expanded, flat outline, Ellis 2165,
X 100. B, leaf margin, Ellis 2164, X 100. C-D, Ellis 2166: C, outline, X 100; D, chlorenchyma cell arrangement and vas-
cular bundles with parenchymatous extensions, X 250. E— F, Ellis 2191: E, vascular bundle arrangement, X 160; F, detail
of chloroplasts in chlorenchyma and bundle sheath cells, interference contrast, X 250.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
199
or restricted to two or four rows; stomata in files separat-
ed by single interstomatal long cell, this either short or
elongated, more than three times longer than wide;
tend to be overarched by inflated long cells (Figure 9F).
Intercostal short cells: presence variable, either absent
or irregularly present to present between all long cells;
either single or paired; tall and narrow in shape. Papillae:
absent. Prickles: absent except for very small hooks
which are rarely present (Figure 6D ). Microhairs : present
or absent; elongated, basal and distal cells about equal
in length (Figures 4C, 9H) or distal cell much shorter
(Figure 9D); hairs short, about the same length as the
stomata; distal cell deciduous and thin-walled. Macro-
hairs: usually absent but may be present (Figures 2A— D,
9A, B); unicellular, hard, stiff and pointed; base con-
stricted and superficial, not associated with specialized
raised epidermal cells (Figures 9B, 10); appressed to leaf
surface and visible in transections (Figure 1A, C & D);
length up to 120 /am; tend to be very numerous; lumens
often filled with air (Figure 2A & B); intercostal. Silica
bodies : horizontally elongated, variable dumbbell-shaped
(Figures 2B, 4E, 6B & D, 8B, D & F); rarely nodular
(Figure 6F); exclusively costal; granules may be present.
Adaxial epidermis in surface view
Differs from abaxial epidermis in having shorter inter-
costal long cells, costal prickles with elongated barbs are
common (Figure 9C & G) and numerous microhairs are
present adjacent to the costal zones (Figure 4F); the
microhairs are larger and more common than on the
abaxial surface; the distal cell may also be rounded and
not tapering (Figure 9H). These differences in frequency
of occurrence, size and shape of the adaxial and abaxial
microhairs on the same leaf are unusual.
FIGURE 4. — A-E, abaxial epidermis of Group 2 Chaetobromus specimens: A-C, Ellis 2191: A, zonation pattern, X 160; B,
intercostal zone showing absence of macrohairs, X 250; C, detail of subsidiary cell shape, intercostal long cells and micro-
hairs, X 400. D, fusiform intercostal long cells, Ellis 2164, X 250. E, interference contrast showing microhairs, Ellis 1 730 ,
X 250. F, adaxial epidermis showing prickle hairs and microhairs, Ellis 2206, X 400.
200
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
FIGURE 5. — Transverse sections of Group 3 Chaetobromus specimens. A, outline, Ellis 2358, X 100. B, outline and leaf margin,
Ellis 1691, X 100. C, anatomical detail of chlorenchyma and vascular bundles, Ellis 2357, X 250. D-F, Ellis 1696: D,
slightly inrolled outline, X 100; E, chloroplast distribution in bundle sheath and chlorenchyma cells, X 250; F, interference
contrast showing chloroplast and bundle sheath cell shape, X 250.
DISCUSSION
Subfamilial and tribal classification
The results of this study confirm and expand the find-
ings of De Wet (1956) and Watson etal. (1986) who re-
ported a ‘festucoid’ transectional anatomy and a panicoid
abaxial epidermis for Chaetobromus . The abaxial epider-
mis is not pooid in several respects such as the possession
of microhairs, dumbbell -shaped silica bodies and dome-
shaped stomata, and as a result, pooid relationships can
be discounted. Microhairs are unknown in pooid grasses
and dumbbell-shaped silica bodies are very rare (Watson
et al. 1985). Watson et al. (1986) did not observe abaxial
microhairs on Chaetobromus but their presence is con-
firmed here although they are rare and appear to be absent
on those specimens assigned to groups 3 and 4. Panicoid
type dumbbell-shaped silica bodies are common although
the nodular type of pooid body was sometimes present.
This confirms the observations of Watson et al. (1986).
The pooid type of stomata, in which the guard cells over-
lap the interstomatal cells (Watson & Johnston 1978),
do not appear to occur in Chaetobromus as reported by
Watson et al. (1986). Instead the guard cells are flush
with the interstomatals and the subsidiary cells are dome-
shaped. This is typical of the panicoid type and not pooid
where the subsidiaries are typically parallel-sided.
The transectional anatomy of Chaetobromus, on the
other hand, can be considered to be of the pooid type.
The outer bundle sheath cells are non-Kranz and do
not possess specialized chloroplasts and have thin cell
walls. The chlorenchyma cells are large parenchymatous
cells usually diffusely arranged, often tending to the
radiate condition. The genus is undoubtedly C3 as sug-
gested by Watson et al. (1986) although this has yet to
be confirmed physiologically.
This combination of pooid transectional anatomy
with a panicoid type of epidermis is typical of the Arun-
dinoideae. The leaf anatomy, therefore, supports arundi-
noid affinities for Chaetobromus and is in full agreement
with the classification of the genus in the Arundineae
(Clayton & Renvoize 1986).
Certain aspects of the chlorenchyma of Chaetobromus
deserve further comment. As noted by Watson et al.
(1986), the lateral cell count is rather low, from 3-5
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
201
FIGURE 6. — Abaxial epidermal structure of Chaetobromus specimens of Group 3. A-B, Ellis 2357: A, costal and intercostal
zone distribution, X 160; B, fusiform long cells and differential staining of intercostal long cells, X 250. C-D, Ellis 2358:
C, costal and intercostal zones, X 160; D, costal and intercostal silica bodies and short intercostal hooks, X 250. E, epider-
mal pattern, Ellis 1696, X 160. F, subsidiary cell and silica body shape, Ellis 692, X 400.
cells, which is unusual in a C3 plant. The chlorenchyma
arrangement may also tend to the radial type of arrange-
ment although more than one layer of radiating cells is
always present. This chlorenchyma arrangement re-
sembles that of Dregeochloa pumila (Nees) Conert (Ellis
1977), another danthonioid from the winter rainfall
coastal areas of the southern Namib Desert. Merxmuel-
lera rangei (Pilg.) Conert appears to represent the ex-
treme of this type of development (EUis 1982). The
vegetation of this area is dominated by succulents and
the chlorenchyma of these associated grasses is reminis-
cent of that of CAM plants, particularly the large size
of the cells, their particular radial type of arrangement,
the persistent nuclei, large vacuoles and the refractive
nature of the chloroplasts under interference contrast
illumination. The CAM photosynthetic pathway is un-
known in the Poaceae but, if it does occur, these grasses
appear to be the most likely candidates. Their photo-
synthetic physiology deserves investigation as it may
demonstrate the presence of CAM in the grass family.
Differences between the species of Chaetobromus
The basic anatomical differences between the four
species or groups in the genus are listed in Table 1.
These are usually not discrete differences and they
often intergrade between the groups. However, they do
give an indication of the anatomical tendencies evident
within the genus.
TABLE 1. — The main anatomical differences separating the infrageneric taxa of Chaetobromus
202
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
3
s <2
CL
D §J,.
O a;
o2 "a
M &
.g J=1
5
c o
o
> «o > M
1 " |o
| S Is
Z <N co C,
o T3
3 12
3 8>
3 c
a" o
S3 %
'll
<u .g x> -d
<! W TS 02 co <C <C
(n a
Oh
o a:
02 "a
Or;
s o
§
o
o
° .3 o
£ T3 5 £ -S
c o ! |> 2
’Be q *«2
■a ^ wo 3 g
c ,£> cn b
|S A -Si
* a ° -1 c
w « <n > 6
S3 3
3 *
5) .3
02 co
C <
n •«
H SJ
02 «
OU
■g .3
It 1
,sl ?
3 -c g
0 £ 2
1 IfJ
*1
1?
tj c3
fl> ±3
04 co
rO g
C £
Ph C
° §
P4 2
O -s
T3 *3
0) ^
* e
3.
O
q
<d -a
T3 ^ °
§| T
&f §
W -3 <n
3 -a **
I a o
T3 (D
,g « g
S VI Ph
s I §
_ '3
<D H
c* £
S2 5
hJ C
3 o
! !
•g 3
cd CJ
s <
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
Group 1 . Chaetobromus involucratus
Anatomy
The leaf blades are expanded but tend to roll inwards
from both margins when desiccated. The well developed
adaxial ribs and steep-sided furrows (Figure ID & F)
may be associated with this inrolling mechanism. The
blades are of intermediate thickness and width and usually
contain 7 first order vascular bundles. The chlorenchyma
cells are angular to equidimensional and not elongated
as in Group 2.
The abaxial macrohairs are diagnostic for this group
(Figures 2A-D, 9A, B, 10). Rectangular long cells with-
out sinuous walls and the presence of microhairs (al-
though rare) characterize the epidermis of this group.
These microhairs have tapering distal cells which may be
equal to or much shorter than the basal cell (Figure 9D).
The diagnostic abaxial macrohairs are not always pro-
duced on all leaves or on all plants. Chippindall (1955)
considers these hairs to be deciduous as the older leaves
appear to become glabrous. The epidermal anatomy con-
firms that their bases are only superficial and are not
inserted between the epidermal cells. Instead they are
attached to a small, raised intercostal short cell (Figure
10) which possibly acts as a hinge mechanism. On leaves
with few or no hairs, however, there is no evidence of
these short cells, or of the slight disruption in the inter-
costal long cell pattern caused by these bases (Figure 2B).
This evidence appears to indicate that these hairs are not
deciduous but that their presence is variable, either tem-
porally or spatially.
The function of these hairs is unknown but, as macro-
hairs or prickles also occur on other perennial grasses
from this fog belt, they may help in trapping moisture
from the regular sea mists. Examples are Dregeochloa
pumila (Ellis 1977) and Centropodia glauca (Nees) T.A.
Cope (Ellis 1984).
Morphology and ecology’
Found in loose windblown sand and unstabilized
coastal dunes of the Strandveld of Namaqualand. Particu-
larly common in the north from Hondeklip Bay to Alexan-
der Bay but extending as far southward as St Helena Bay
( Ellis 703). The rainfall of this region is very low, 50—
150 mm per annum mainly in winter, but it is subject
to frequent sea mists. The vegetation is a sparse succulent
scrub and the substrate is loose and sandy.
Populations of this taxon are exceedingly variable in
vegetative morphology, with each individual plant dif-
fering in size, foliage colour and growth form. Plants are
generally erect tufts up to 0,3 m high with the leaves
being borne all the way up the culms. The inflorescences
are not well exserted. Sometimes the plants are basally
tufted but this appears to be in response to grazing. Rhi-
zomes are not prominent except in these basally tufted
specimens. The roots often are enclosed in a prominent
rhizosphere of sand grains.
The leaf blades are expanded to slightly inrolled and
are densely hairy with soft, silky, appressed hairs on the
203
abaxial or both surfaces. This is particularly the case
when the leaves are young but, according to Chippindall
(1955), they become almost glabrous when older. This
is, however, not supported by the available anatomical
evidence. There is also a definite decrease in the degree
of pubescence southwards from the Orange River and
the specimen from St Helena Bay has only a few marginal
hairs. However, specimens from the north may also have
few hairs.
The Group 1 specimens grade into the Group 3 type
from St Helena Bay southwards and their distribution
is sympatric between St Helena and Elands Bay. South
of this area sea mists decrease in relative importance and
frequency and this may account for the loss of the
macrohairs.
The morphology of the Group 1 plants conforms
closely to the description of C. involucratus (Chippin-
dall 1955) and most specimens assigned to this group
were identified as such. However, a few were identified
as C. schraderi because these usually had very few macro-
hairs as in Ellis 703 and 2176 (Figure IE & F) but the
blade of Ellis 21 75, which was examined anatomically,
had a dense pubescence (Figure 2 A & B).
Group 1 is therefore virtually synonymous with
C. involucratus and is reasonably distinct from the other
taxa. It is distinguished morphologically by the presence
of the diagnostic hairs and it also occupies a specialized
habitat. However, it does intergrade with both Groups
2 and 3, both in morphology and ecology, and they can-
not always be clearly separated.
Group 2. Oiaetobromus schraderi
Anatomy
All specimens have expanded but flat leaf blades
which appear to fold in response to moisture stress. This
contrasts to the inrolling of the leaves of Groups 1 & 3.
The adaxial ribs and furrows are also poorly developed
(Figures 3E & F) and this may be associated with the
infolding rather than an inrolling mechanism. The leaf
blades are thicker than in any of the other groups and
may be up to 550 pm thick. The leaves also tend to be
wider with an average of 9 first order bundles. The chlo-
renchyma is distinctive with large, elongated or rounded
cells arranged in a radiate manner; the nuclei tend to be
persistent and the chloroplasts may be refractive. This
chlorenchyma structure resembles that of some liliaceous
CAM plants and Group 2 plants may exhibit modifica-
tions of the C3 photosynthetic pathway.
Macrohairs are absent and the long cells have straight
walls and are usually rectangular as in Group 1. However,
they do vary and may be fusiform in shape (Figure 4D).
Microhairs are present although uncommon and the distal
cell does not taper to a pointed apex (Figure 9H).
The transverse sections of the Group 2 plants are dis-
tinctive but the abaxial epidermis resembles that of Group
1 more than that of the other two anatomical groups.
The main differences between Groups 1 and 2 are the
absence of macrohairs and the shape of the microhairs.
204
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
FIGURE 7. — Transections of Group 4 specimens of Chaetobromus . A, narrow, infolded leaf blade, Ellis 2424, X 100. B, vascu-
lar bundle arrangement, interference contrast, Ellis 2423, X 160. C-D, Ellis 2467 : C, infolded leaf, X 100; D, detail of
chloroplasts in chlorenchyma and bundle sheath cells, X 250. E— F, Ellis 2450: E, inrolled, setaceous outline, X 160; F,
vascular bundles showing low lateral cell count, X 250. G, outline of specimen from mountain fynbos on sandstone, Ellis
2457, X 100. H, outline of specimen from Succulent Karoo, Ellis 2426, X 100.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988) 205
FIGURE 8. — Abaxial epidermis of Group 4 Chaetobromus specimens. A-B, Ellis 2424 : A, epidermal zonation, X 160; B, de-
tail of fusiform long cells and stomata, interference contrast, X 250. C-D, Ellis 2457 : C, interference contrast showing
numerous stomata in regular files, X 160; D, detail of stomata, intercostal long cells and costal cells (note absence of mi-
crohairs), X 250. E, epidermal pattern with differential staining, Ellis 2467, X 160. F, stomata and silica bodies, inter-
ference contrast, Ellis 2422, X 250.
Morphology and ecology
This group is found in the Namaqualand Coast Belt
of the Succulent Karoo and in Namaqualand Broken
Veld. It appears to prefer heavier stony soils, often be-
tween granite rocks in the mountains of Namaqualand.
It also occurs on the sand of the coastal plain but not on
unstabilized sand, the habitat characteristic of Group 1.
The specimens Ellis 5071 (Group 1) and Ellis 5073
(Group 2) are informative in this regard as they were
found growing in close proximity to each other but
differ considerably in epidermal structure (Figure 9A-
H). Ellis 5073 was rooted in gravelly soil between granite
boulders which had subsequently been covered by fine,
loose wind-blown sand in which Ellis 5071 was growing.
Group 2 plants are most common along roadside verges
where they are protected from grazing.
The distribution area extends from the Richtersveld
in the north to the Vanrhynsdorp District in the south.
This area receives a sparse winter rainfall varying between
50-300 mm per annum with fog decreasing in importance.
The vegetation is dominated by succulents.
Populations of Group 2 plants are very variable with
individual plants exhibiting different growth forms and
vegetative morphology. Generally they are robust, tall
plants up to 0,9 m tall. The leaves are not basally con-
centrated but are cauline. These leaves are long and ex-
panded, up to 10 mm wide and glabrous. The leaf sheaths
may be hairy and the adaxial surface has short prickles
(Figure 4F). The rhizomes are short but well developed
and inclined upwards resulting in loosely caespitose
plants. The roots are tough and corky and a rhizosphere
is seldom developed.
206
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
207
The name applied to most specimens of this group is
C. schraderi although two specimens were identified as
C. dregeanus. Morphologically and ecologically this
group is not well separated from C. involucratus (Group
1) and appears to be an inland segregate of that species.
Chippindall (1955) considered C. schraderi to be a sand
dune species found south of Saldanha Bay to Table Bay.
This distribution corresponds with the Group 3 speci-
mens of the present study, all of which were determined
as C. dregeanus. The possibility therefore exists that
these names have been misapplied.
Although no consistent and reliable vegetative and
ecological diagnostic characters appear to distinguish
C. involucratus (Group 1) from C. schraderi (Group 2),
leaf anatomy reveals differences which may justify the
upholding of these two taxa.
Group 3. Chaetobromus dregeanus (lowland form)
Anatomy
The leaf blades are flattened to slightly inrolled with
adaxial ribs and furrows and are generally thinner than
in either Group 1 or 2. The chlorenchyma cells resemble
those of Group 1, being angular and equidimensional
(Figures 5C & F) and not as large and elongated as in
Group 2. The transectional anatomy is, therefore, very
similar to that of Group 1 .
The abaxial epidermis, on the other hand, differs
considerably from that of Group 1. Macrohairs and
microhairs are absent and the long cells are sinuous.
This epidermal structure resembles that of Group 4.
Morphology and ecology
Only a small sample of this taxon was studied but all
specimens were collected in the southern Strandveld,
from Elands Bay southwards to Table Bay, in the Dense
Strandveld Scrub variation of this veld type (Acocks
1975). Winter rainfall is higher (200—300 mm) than
further north and fog is infrequent. The vegetation con-
sists of a dense, dwarf, semi-succulent scrub, about 1 m
tall. The sand is stabilized, the dunes being well vegetated
and the soil has a high humus content. This is clearly
evident on the roots which are black in colour.
The plants form loose, diffuse tufts up to 0,4 m high.
The culms are not basally concentrated but dispersed
and linked by rhizomes or even stolons up to 0,25 m
long. Scattered culms, therefore, protrude through the
dense scrubby vegetation. The leaves are borne up the
culms and are expanded to slightly inrolled but glabrous.
This group appears to represent a southward extension
of C. involucratus (Group 1) which has become adapted
to the absence of fog, a denser vegetation and stabilized,
FIGURE 10. — Base and epidermal attachment of abaxial macro-
hair of Group 1, Chaetobromus involucratus, Ellis 5071,
X 660.
humic sand. Unexpectedly the identification of the
voucher specimens does not reflect this relationship as
they were all assigned to C. dregeanus, a species which
does not appear to be closely linked to C. involucratus.
Judging by the identification, Group 3 is therefore con-
sidered to be merely a lowland form of C. dregeanus.
This view, however, is in conflict with the evidence pre-
sented here. Chippindall (1955) considered C. schraderi
to occur in these southern Strandveld areas and this
taxon may, therefore, actually be C. schraderi. The typi-
fication of the names applied to these Chaetobromus taxa
is required to resolve these nomenclatural difficulties.
Group 4. Chaetobromus dregeanus (mountain form)
Anatomy
The transectional anatomy of this group is diagnostic,
the leaves being narrow and strongly infolded or inrolled.
In some cases this reduction resembles the permanently
infolded, setaceous condition (Figure 7E). Associated
with this narrowing of the leaf blade is a reduction in
the number of first order vascular bundles to 5 and the
loss of the second order bundles. The cleft-like adaxial
furrows may also result from the extreme infolding ex-
hibited by some specimens of this group (Figure 7E &
F).
The epidermis bears a close resemblance to that of
Group 3 due to the sinuous long cell walls and the ab-
sence of microhairs and macrohairs.
Morphology and ecology
This group includes all those Chaetobromus speci-
mens from the inland, mountainous areas of the western
FIGURE 9. — SEM micrographs showing the abaxial and adaxial epidermal structure of specimens of Chaetobromus involucratus
and C. schraderi collected at the same locality. A-D, Ellis 5071, Group 1: A, abaxial epidermis showing dense pubescence of
intercostal macrohairs, X 66; B, detail of macrohairs showing superficial bases, X 204; C, adaxial epidermis with prickle hairs
on ribs which differ in size and base structure from the abaxial macrohairs, X 204; D, abaxial microhair with very short,
tapering distal cell, X 900. E-H, Ellis 5073, Group 2: E, abaxial epidermis lacking macrohairs, X 66; F, detail of inflated
intercostal long cells overarching the slightly sunken stomata, X 204; G, adaxial epidermal ribs with prickle hairs with short
barbs, X 204; H, adaxial microhair showing basal and distal cells of equal length and the distal cell with a blunt apex, X 1320.
208
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
Cape. Most representatives of this group were collected
in the Western Mountain Karoo, particularly in the lower
or semi-succulent form of this veld type (Acocks 1975)
from the Loeriesfontein, Calvinia and Sutherland Dis-
tricts. These areas range in altitude from 600-1000 m
above sea level and receive 150 mm and less of rain,
mostly in winter. They are dry, heavily overgrazed areas
with a sparse karroid vegetation. Nowadays Chaeto-
bromus is only found in protected sites between rocks
and under bushes but it may formerly have been much
more common, extending further eastwards as far as
Fraserburg and even Hanover (Chippindall 1955).
A few other specimens with narrow, infolded leaves
have also been included in this group although they differ
slightly in leaf anatomy and occur in other veld types.
The sample studied is too small to draw meaningful con-
clusions but these may deserve recognition as separate
groups. Ellis 2457 is the only specimen studied which
originated in Mountain Fynbos on soil derived from Table
Mountain Sandstone. The anatomy differs little from
that characteristic of this group although abaxial stomata
are particularly common (Figures 7G, 8C & D). Ellis
2426 is the other specimen assigned to this group on
anatomical grounds but it was collected in the Succulent
Karoo on very stony soil. This specimen is characterized
by having well developed sclerenchyma strands and
adaxial ribs and furrows (Figure 7H).
Plants of this group are characteristically densely tuft-
ed with basally concentrated foliage, cauline leaves being
absent. The leaves are rolled or folded, narrow to fili-
form (1—3 mm wide), and glabrous. The inflorescences
are exserted well above the foliage. Bases are dense, com-
pact to almost flabellate with short rhizomes. Lateral
spreading rhizomes are seldom present and then only up
to 0,1 m long.
All voucher specimens were determined as C. dregeanus
and this group appears to represent a mountain form of
this species. A different concept of C. dregeanus appears
to have been applied by Chippindall (1955) as she also
included specimens with tall culms with cauline leaves
from the Namaqualand coastal plain. In the present study
this latter type of specimen has been grouped with C.
schraderi in Group 2. This nomenclatural problem must
be resolved before the correct names for these taxa can
be applied. Group 4 is nevertheless, morphologically,
ecologically and anatomically distinct and separate from
the other three groups.
CONCLUSIONS
The 33 Chaetobromus specimens examined in this
study can be grouped into four anatomical entities, each
possessing a characteristic combination of attributes;
most groups also have additional diagnostic anatomical
characters. Thus Group 1 has abaxial macrohairs and
tapering microhairs; Group 2 has truncated microhairs,
thick, flat or slightly infolded blades and distinct chloren-
chyma; Group 3 is similar to Group 1 but lacks macro-
hairs and microhairs and has sinuous long cell walls, and
Group 4 has setaceous leaves without second order vas-
cular bundles. Other characters are shared by pairs of
groups. Groups 1 and 2 both have microhairs and straight-
walled long cells whereas Groups 3 and 4 do not have
microhairs and the long cells have sinuous walls. Groups
1 and 3 both have inrolled leaves whereas Groups 2 and
4 tend to have infolded leaves.
Discontinuities are therefore not clear between the
four groups and they tend to intergrade into one another
in a reticulate manner. The groups are not discrete en-
tities but merely seem to reflect evolutionary trends. A
similar situation is also evident in the ecological prefer-
ences and vegetative and spike let morphology. For these
reasons it is extremely difficult to reliably and consistent-
ly define species and the recommendations of this study
are to uphold only a single species in the genus with four
reasonably clear subspecific taxa. These appear to re-
present ecotypes, each occurring in a specific habitat;
the differing ecological parameters appear to be reflect-
ed in the anatomy and vegetative morphology but no
consistent spikelet differences appear to be associated
with these environmental differences.
Populations of Chaetobromus plants in the field are
exceedingly variable, even within limited populations,
with each plant often differing in vegetative morphology.
This appears to be the case even in homogeneous habi-
tats where all the individuals appear to be of equal age
and are subject to the same environmental constraints.
In less uniform habitats, such as rocky outcrops where
soil depth, moisture availability and insolation can vary
over very short distances, this variation becomes even
more exaggerated, particularly if the area is also subject
to grazing. This type of variation suggests that genetic
differences exist between individuals even in small
populations. This appears to be confirmed by chromo-
some numbers of n = 12, 24 and 27 for different speci-
mens of Chaetobromus as well as indications of karyo-
type evolution in the form of paracentric inversions
(Spies & Du Plessis 1988).
Clearly the taxonomy of this genus requires further
biosystematic study including detailed fieldwork, cyto-
genetics and even transplant experiments. This detailed
study is fully justified as Chaetobromus appears to
possess excellent potential as a fodder grass. With correct
veld management based on knowledge of the reproduc-
tive biology and vegetative ontogeny of the genus this
grass could help considerably in enhancing the range
quality and carrying capacity of the Succulent Karoo
Biome.
ACK NOW LEDGEMENTS
Mrs H. Ebertsohn is gratefully thanked for technical
assistance, Mrs A. Romanowski for the photography,
Mrs S. Perold for the electron microscopy, and Mrs M.
van der Merwe for typing the manuscript.
REFERENCES
ACOCKS, J.P.H. 1975. Veld Types of South Africa, 2nd edn.
Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 40:
1-127.
BREAKWELL, E. 1914. A study of the leaf anatomy of some
native species of the genus Andropogon (Gramineae). Pro-
ceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 39:
385-394.
CHIPPINDALL, L.K.A. 1955. In D. Meredith, The grasses and
pastures of South Africa. CNA, Johannesburg.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
CLAYTON, W.D. & RENVOIZE, S. 1986. Genera graminum,
grasses of the World. Kew Bulletin, Addition Series XIII:
1-389.
DE WET, J.M.J. 1956. Leaf anatomy and phylogeny in the tribe
Danthonieae. American Journal of Botany 43: 175-182.
DU PLESSIS, H. & SPIES, J.J. 1988. Chromosome studies on
African plants. 8. Bothalia 18: 119-122.
ELLIS, R.P. 1976. A procedure for standardizing comparative
leaf anatomy in the Poaceae. 1. The leaf blade as viewed
in transverse section. Bothalia 12: 65-109.
ELLIS, R.P. 1977. Leaf anatomy of the South African Dantho-
nieae (Poaceae). 1. The genus Dregeochloa. Bothalia 12:
209-213.
ELLIS, R.P. 1979. A procedure for standardizing comparative
leaf anatomy in the Poaceae. 2. The epidermis as seen in
surface view. Bothalia 12: 641-672.
ELLIS, R.P. 1982. Leaf anatomy of the South African Dantho-
nieae (Poaceae). VII. Merxmuellera dura and M. rangei
Bothalia 14: 95-99.
ELLIS, R.P. 1984. Leaf anatomy of the South African Dantho-
nieae (Poaceae). IX. Asthenatherum glaucum. Bothalia 15:
153-159.
209
FEDER, N. & O’BRIEN, O.P. 1968. Plant microtechnique: some
principles and new methods. American Journal of Botany
55: 123-142.
JOHANSEN, D.A. 1940. Plant microtechnique. McGraw-Hill,
New York.
METCALFE, C.R. 1960. Anatomy of the Monocotyledons. 1.
Gramineae. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
SMOOK, L. & GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E. 1985. Poaceae. In G.E.
Gibbs Russell, C. Reid, J. van Rooy & L. Smook, List of
species of southern African plants, edn 2, part 1. Memoirs
of the Botanical Survey of South A frica No. 51: 1-152.
WATSON, L., CLIFFORD, H.T. & DALLWITZ, M.J. 1985. The
classification of Poaceae: subfamilies and supertribes.
Australian Journal of Botany 33: 433-484.
WATSON, L., DALLWITZ, M.J. & JOHNSTON, C.R. 1986. Grass
genera of the world: 728 detailed descriptions from an
automated database. Australian Journal of Botany 34:
223-230.
WATSON, L. & JOHNSTON, C.R. 1978. Taxonomic variation in
stomatal insertion among grass leaves. Australian Journal
of Botany 26: 235-238.
Bothalia 18,2: 211-220 (1988)
Flora of the Zuurberg National Park. 1. Characterization of major
vegetation units
B-E. VAN WYK*, P.A. NOVELLIE** and C.M. VAN WYK+
Keywords: Afromontane Forest, biogeography, eastern Cape, Fynbos Biome, Grassland, Grassy Fynbos, Mountain Fynbos, Subtropical
Thicket, vegetation units
ABSTRACT
The distribution of major vegetation units or veld types in the Zuurberg National Park, situated on the eastern
limits of the Fynbos Biome, is presented. Structural and floristic criteria are used to describe and map five basic
units, namely Afromontane Forest, Subtropical Thicket, Mountain Fynbos, Grassy Fynbos and Grassland.
UITTREKSEL
Die verspreiding van die hoofplantegroei-eenhede of veldtipes in die Zuurberg Nasionale Park, gelee aan die
oostelike grens van die Fynbosbioom, word aangebied. Strukturele en floristiese maatstawwe word gebruik om
vyf basiese eenhede te beskryf en te karteer, naamlik Afromontane Woud, Subtropiese Ruigtes, Bergfynbos,
Grasryke Fynbos en Grasveld.
INTRODUCTION
The Zuurberg National Park represents one of the
largest conservation areas incorporating Grassy Fynbos,
a vegetation type characteristic of the eastern limits of
the Fynbos Biome. An intricate mosaic of vegetation
types is present, reflecting the rugged topography, variety
of aspects and different microclimates. The biogeographi-
cal complexity of the eastern Cape is well known and is
a result of the convergence of four major phytochoria
(Goldblatt 1978; Gibbs Russell & Robinson 1981;
Cowling 1983a, 1983b, 1984; Lubke et al. 1986). This
diversity represents a major challenge in terms of con-
servation, since management measures taken for one
plant community may not be suitable for another.
* Department of Botany, Rand Afrikaans University, P.O. Box
524, Johannesburg 2000.
** National Parks Board, Private Bag X66, Cradock 5880.
t Botanical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and
Water Supply, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001.
MS. received: 1987.12.28.
No comprehensive account of the vegetation of the
Park is available. Existing knowledge is fragmentary and
limited to unpublished official reports and management
plans (Stehle 1979; Charlton 1982; Breytenbach &
Vlok 1985; Geldenhuys 1985). A research project to
provide basic floristic data and to explore the vegeta-
tional diversity was started in 1985. The results of a
preliminary survey aimed at describing and mapping the
major vegetation units is presented in this paper.
STUDY AREA
The study area is situated in the Zuurberg mountain
range, approximately 70 km due north of Port Eliza-
beth (Figure 1). The Park comprises three separate
parts with a total area of more than 20000 ha. The
Zuurberg forms part of the Cape Folded Belt and con-
sists mainly of hard quartzitic rock of the Witteberg
Group with numerous narrow bands of shale. Most of
the area is characterized by a series of mountain plateaus
separated by deep valleys with an east-west orientation.
FIGURE 1. — Locality of the stu-
dy area showing the dif-
ferent parts of the Zuurberg
National Park.
Both alia 18,2 (1988)
212
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
213
TABLE 1. — Mean monthly rainfall (mm) at Zuurberg Lot 16 for the period 1931 to 1962 (Geldenhuys 1985)
JFMAMJ JASOND Total
66,8 63,8 95,0 53,3 43,0 25,5 38,3 35,7 77,0 79,7 78,9 64,7 721,7
The topography is very rugged due to the erosion of
softer shale bands from between alternating layers of
quartzites, but there are no peaks or steep cliffs. Height
above sea level varies between 250 and 970 m. The climate
is temperate with a mean annual rainfall of ± 722 mm.
Table 1 shows rainfall figures recorded at the office (Lot
16) between 1931 and 1962. The mean monthly figures
clearly show that spring and autumn maxima are expe-
rienced. Unlike other fynbos areas, winter months are
the driest. Thunderstorms commonly occur during the
summer months, when lightning fires may also be ex-
pected. Soil texture and soil depth vary considerably as
a result of the geological and topographical diversity.
The soils of the Zuurberg are generally more fertile and
finer textured than soils of the Cape Folded Belt to the
west (Campbell 1983; Cowling 1984).
METHODS
Ground patrols and an aerial reconnaissance by heli-
copter were undertaken to interpret aerial photographs
and to become familiar with the terrain, vegetation and
plant species. Herbarium specimens were collected on
several visits during 1985, 1986 and 1987. A checklist
of all the plant species recorded, complete with their
author names, is presented in part 2 of this series (Van
Wyk et al. 1988).
Vegetation units of the study area were visually iden-
tified according to vegetation structure and they corres-
pond roughly with the ‘veld type’ concept of Acocks
(1953) or the rank of class (Cowling 1984). A map
(Figure 2) was drawn from 1:50000 aerial photographs.
A series of colour slides taken by helicopter from differ-
ent angles at low altitude was used to verify the boun-
daries between vegetation units. The area covered by each
unit (Table 3) was estimated from the 1:50000 map by
a randomly positioned 2 mm grid. Descriptive data for
each of the five major vegetation units were obtained
from 64 sample quadrats distributed as shown in Table
2. All the quadrats were permanently marked by 1,2 m
iron fencing standards in each corner (5 x 10 m plots),
one at the centre of each short end (4 x 25 m plots) or
one at the centre (400 m2 circular plots). Localities were
selected so as to include most of the variation in each
vegetation type. Plot size varied between 50 and 400 m2
(Table 2).
The following information was recorded in each plot:
all identifiable species present, Braun-Blanquet cover
values for each species (r = < 1 % projected canopy cover;
1 = <5%; 2 = 6-25%; 3 = 26-50%; 4 = 51-75%;
5 = >75%), total projected canopy cover of all species,
height of different strata (grass layer, shrub layer, canopy
height and height of emergents) and, for Forest and
Thicket plots, also diameter at breast height of all indi-
vidual trees (if more than 100 mm). In view of the tremen-
dous variability of the vegetation, the sample size was
inadequate for a detailed phytosociological classification.
It does, however, provide sufficient information to cha-
racterize the major vegetation units. For descriptive pur-
poses, species were classed into growth forms as shown
in Tables 5-14. Dominant and characteristic species of
each vegetation unit were chosen as follows:
Characteristic (diagnostic) species: species with a
fidelity value of 80% or more.
Dominant species: species with a mean Braun-
Blanquet cover value of at least 0,80.
In these calculations, single occurrences (species pre-
sent in only one plot) were excluded. Forest and Thicket
plots were considered separately from the Mountain Fyn-
bos, Grassy Fynbos and Grassland plots. This seemed
reasonable as only a few species were common to both
subdivisions, and of these very few qualified as character-
istic or dominant.
RESULTS
The dominant vegetation types in the study area were
Grassy Fynbos (33%) and Subtropical Thicket (32%)
(Figure 2, Table 3). Grassland (18%), Afromontane
Forest (12%) and Mountain Fynbos (5%) had more
limited distributions.
A summary of floristic and structural characteristics
of the major vegetation units as recorded in 64 sample
plots is given in Table 4. Species richness (expressed as
species per m2 of plot area) varied between 0,13 (Forest)
to 0,92 (Mountain Fynbos). These values are dependent
on quadrat area, so that only the figures for Grassland,
Grassy Fynbos and Mountain Fynbos are directly com-
parable. The high figure for Thickets compared to
Forest agrees with previous findings that Afromontane
Forests are poorer in species than Thickets in the east-
ern Cape (Cowling 1983b). When distinct differences
in structure (Table 4) are considered in conjunction with
diagnostic and dominant species (Tables 5 to 14), each
of the major units is clearly distinguishable.
1 . Afromontane Forest
Forests comprising tall evergreen trees with canopy
heights of 10 to 14 m and emergents of up to 21 m occur
on south-facing slopes and in some valley bottoms.
Forest types on northern slopes and in alluvial valley
bottoms with canopy heights of 2—9 m and emergents
of up to 12 m are grouped with the next unit (Sub-
tropical Thicket). The distinction was not made on the
basis of structure only. We also used the almost total
absence of a herbaceous ground layer and the presence
of typical Afromontane species (White 1978) such as
Podocarpus falcatus and Diospyros whyteana. Despite a
strong Tongoland-Pondoland influence, there are pro-
nounced floristic differences between Afromontane For-
est and Subtropical Thicket in the eastern Cape (Cowling
1984). In the results of our survey, 24 tree species have
fidelity values of more than 80% (present in less than
214
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
TABLE 2. — Number of sample quadrats. All were permanently marked to double as long term monitoring plots
TABLE 3. — Distribution of major vegetation units in different parts of the Zuurberg National Park. Areas were estimated from the
maps in Figure 2
TABLE 4. — Floristic and structural characteristics of the major vegetation units of the Zuurberg National Park
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
20% of non-Forest plots) and 18 of these were recorded
only in Forest. Shrubs are rare, succulents are virtually
absent, and eight of the 10 fern species recorded occur
exclusively in Forest. Diagnostic and dominant species
are listed in Tables 5 and 6.
2. Subtropical Thicket
Thicket as defined here comprises a variable assem-
blage of communities dominated by thorny and/or suc-
culent shrubs. They occur on dry north-facing slopes
in higher parts and on all aspects in lower-lying south-
ern parts of the study area. Most of them comprise
what Lubke et al. (1986) describe as Valley Bushveld.
This term was used by Acocks (1953) but is no longer
useful because it incorporates too wide a range of types
(Cowling 1984). At least three basic types were includ-
ed in our sample:
TABLE 5. — Diagnostic species of Afromontane Forest grouped
by growth form. Single occurrences are excluded
* Sum of Braun-Blanquet cover estimates divided by presence; for
Forest and Thicket plots a cover of less than 5% was recorded as
0,50.
215
Kaffrarian Thicket
Closed, non-succulent shrubland to low forest com-
munities dominated by evergreen, sclerophyllous trees
and shrubs with a high cover of stem spines and vines
(Cowling 1984; Everard 1987). Campbell (1985) would
classify much of the taller thicket of this type as Eastern
Forest & Thicket.
Kaffrarian Succulent Thicket
This type occurs in dry areas and is characterized by a
high proportion of succulents, a great diversity in growth
form and a strong Karoo-Namib floristic influence (Cow-
ling 1984; Campbell 1985; Everard 1987). A variation
of this type, similar to Addo Bush and Sundays River
Scrub (Acocks 1953), occurs in southern parts such as
the northern slopes at Superbus (see Figure 2). The lat-
ter has a canopy height of no more than 2—3 m and is
dominated by Schotia afra, Putterlickia pyracantha, Phyl-
lanthus verrucosus and Euphorbia ledienii. Portulacaria
afra dominates in some parts, particularly on steep slopes
in the western parts of the Park.
Combretum caff rum- Acacia caffra Thicket
This type has a very limited distribution along river
beds. Since the dominant species ( Combretum caffrum
and Acacia caffra) are deciduous, it is not included in
the Subtropical Thicket concept and we group it here
provisionally. It shows similarity to the tropical thickets
found in the valleys of Natal and Transvaal.
Diagnostic and dominant species of Subtropical
Thicket are listed in Tables 7 and 8.
3. Mountain Fynbos
Mountain Fynbos has the highest species richness
(Table 4) and covers only an estimated 5% of the Park
TABLE 6.— Dominant species of Afromontane Forest grouped
by growth form. Single occurrences are excluded
216
TABLE 7. — Diagnostic species of Thicket communities grouped
by growth form. Single occurrences are excluded
* Invasive exotic
(Table 3). It is most common on wet southern slopes,
but also occurs on sandy soils in protected low-lying
areas. Mountain Fynbos as defined here is largely synony-
mous to the Mountain Fynbos of Taylor (1978), and
Kruger (1979) and the Mesotrophic Proteoid Fynbos of
Campbell (1985), but it also includes some communities
that may represent later serai stages of the next unit
(Grassy Fynbos). The Mountain Fynbos represented in
our sampling has a relatively low total grass cover and a
high proportion of C3 grasses ( Festuca , Pentaschistis
and Merxmuellera species) and Restionaceae. Mature
stands of Pro tea lorifolia and P. repens are very localiz-
ed and occur mostly in inaccessible areas. Campbell
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
TABLE 8.- — Dominant species of Thicket communities grouped
by growth form
(1985) did not include mature fynbos of the Zuurberg
in his sample, presumably because it was thought to be
absent (Campbell op. cit. , page 7).
Widdringtonia nodiflora did not occur in any of our
fynbos plots, but it is highly characteristic of our con-
cept of Mountain Fynbos and should be added to the
lengthy list of diagnostic species in Table 9. A large
number of species are locally dominant. The list of
dominant species (Table 10) has therefore been limited
to those with a mean cover value of 1 ,00 or more and,
except for species with very high cover values, a pre-
sence of more than 50% (present in at least eight of the
15 Mountain Fynbos plots).
4. Grassy Fynbos
Grassy Fynbos covers the largest proportion of the
surface area of the Park (Table 3) and occurs on all
plateau tops and also on gentle southern and northern
slopes in higher-lying areas. Diagnostic and dominant
species of Grassy Fynbos are listed in Tables 1 1 and 12.
Campbell (1985) distinguished between three sub-
series of Grassy Fynbos, namely Dry, Mesic and Meso-
trophic. He classified the dominant vegetation of the
Zuurberg as Sundays Mesic Grassy Fynbos but also men-
tioned the lack of good differential characters. The pre-
sence of proteoids over 1 m tall, the less than 40% cover
of Ericaceae, the 10—50% cover of restioids and the
30—90% cover of grasses are used as differentiating fea-
tures by Campbell. Two types of his Mesotrophic sub-
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
217
TABLE 9. — Diagnostic species of Mountain Fynbos communi- TABLE 10. — Dominant species of Mountain Fynbos communi-
ties grouped by growth form. Single occurrences are ex- ties grouped by growth form. Criteria for entry are specified
eluded in the text
series also occur in the Zuurberg, namely Mannetjiesberg
Mesotrophic Grassy Fynbos and Grahamstown Meso-
trophic Grassy Fynbos. In the study area, these two types
have a much more limited distribution than Sundays
Mesic Grassy Fynbos.
Our concept of Grassy Fynbos is much wider than
that of Campbell. We also include Suurberg Grassland
and much of Hankey Grassland, both of which approach
Acocks’s (1953) Dohne Sourveld (Campbell op. tit.).
Hankey Grassveld shows two extremes. A sourveld with
Tristachya leucothrix, Merxmuellera stricta and nume-
rous fynbos elements and a sweetveld with grasses such
218
TABLE 11. — Diagnostic species of Grassy Fynbos grouped by
growth form. Single occurrences are excluded
TABLE 12. — Dominant species of Grassy Fynbos grouped
by growth form
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
as Themeda triandra and Heteropogon contortus with-
out fynbos elements (Campbell op. cit.). The sourveld
is here included under Grassy Fynbos and the sweetveld
under Grassland. In the study area, there is a much great-
er discontinuity in the distribution of fynbos elements
than in those characters used by Campbell to distinguish
between Grassy Fynbos and Grassland. For practical
reasons, we have therefore used the presence of fynbos
elements to differentiate between Grassy Fynbos and
Grassland.
5. Grassland
R.A. Lubke (unpublished data) recognized, in the
northern part of the Sundays River area (Figure 1), two
major grassland communities, namely Festuca costata
Tussock Grassland and Themeda triandra- Tristachy a
leucothrix Grassland. The latter was provisionally sub-
divided by him into Bobartia orientalis Grassland and
Trachypogon spicatus Grassland, further subdivided into
a, Heteropogon contortus Grassland and b, Setaria spha-
celata Grassland.
We have taken a much narrower view and the Grass-
lands of the study area are here considered to include
only those areas where Restionaceae, Ericaceae and Pro-
teaceae are totally absent. Campbell’s (1985) criteria
for recognizing Grassland are difficult to use because of
the gradual decrease of fynbos elements along the tran-
sition from Grassy Fynbos to Grassland. Our concept
therefore includes only part of Campbell’s Hankey
Grassland and seems to be identical to Lubke’s Setaria
sphacelata Grassland. As such it is perhaps the most uni-
form vegetation unit of all and occurs mostly on steep
northern and western slopes. What variation there is,
appears to be the result of soil depth and rockiness.
Some species ( Acacia karroo, Diospyros lycioides and
Aloe ferox for example) are restricted to deep soils on
lower northern slopes, while succulents such as Euphor-
bia polygona are locally dominant only in very rocky
areas.
Diagnostic and dominant species are listed in Tables
13 and 14. Very few of the dominant species have high
fidelity values, so that most of the diagnostic species are
forbs or succulents and not grasses. Elionurus muticus
and Brachiaria serrata are very common but only Setaria
sphacelata var. torta and Aristida diffusa subsp. burkei
appear to be characteristic of Grassland as defined here.
The dominant grasses are also present in Grassy Fynbos,
where their cover values are scarcely lower.
DISCUSSION
The forests of the Zuurberg have floristic elements in
common with both the Amatola and Alexandria Forests
and are similar in species composition to forests in the
Watersmeeting Nature Reserve (Bathurst), the Fort Grey
Nature Reserve (East London) and the Groendal Wilder-
ness Area north of Uitenhage (Geldenhuys 1985). They
differ from the Knysna and Tsitsikamma Forests in species
composition, notably the absence of Ocotea bullata and
Trichocladus crinitus and the presence of species of Pon-
doland-Tongaland affinity. Trees such as Smellophyllum
capense, Atalaya capensis, Homalium dentatum, H. ru-
fescens and Chionanthus peglerae are rare or have limited
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
TABLE 13. — Diagnostic species of Grassland grouped by growth
form. Single occurrences are excluded
distributions in the eastern Cape. The Zuurberg Forests
are relatively isolated and therefore represent an impor-
tant biogeographical link in the distribution of Afro-
montane Forest in the eastern Cape and also between
the eastern and southern Cape (Geldenhuys 1985).
Thicket communities of the Zuurberg are very vari-
able, probably as a result of topographic, rainfall and
edaphic gradients. In terms of structure and species
composition, most of the thicket agrees with Everard’s
(1987) Xeric Kaffrarian Thicket. Only a very small part
of the Kaffrarian Succulent Thicket of the study area is
similar to Addo Bush (Acocks 1953) or Spekboomveld
(Archibald 1955), the dominant vegetation of the Addo
Elephant National Park. Everard (1987) classified the
latter as one of two suborders of Kaffrarian Succulent
Thicket, namely Xeric Succulent Thicket. His other
suborder, Mesic Succulent Thicket, seems floristically
similar to some of the thickets of the Zuurberg.
The Mountain Fynbos of the study area was not in-
cluded in the classification of Campbell (1985) but it
has the differentiating features of his Mesotrophic Pro-
teoid Fynbos. Protea lorifolia and P. repens are the
dominant canopy species and Grassy Fynbos is present
as understorey. In view of the limited and localized dis-
tribution and the high species richness, this vegetation
unit should receive special attention when management
219
TABLE 14. — Dominant species of Grassland grouped by growth
form
policies are formulated. The effects of fire on succession
(under local conditions) need to be studied in detail.
The absence of seed-regenerating Protea species (P. lori-
folia and P. repens ) from the plateau areas may be part-
ly due to frequent fires in the past (see the successional
model of Cowling 1984), but shallower and more fertile
soils could also be limiting factors. Mature stands of
Protea lorifolia are almost exclusively found on sandy
soils.
Judged by diagnostic species, our concept of Grassy
Fynbos appears to be similar to that of Cowling (1984),
who argued that it is not a recently derived vegetation
type as Acocks (1953) proposed. The presence of regional
endemics {Erica demissa, E. pectinifolia, Podalyria bur-
chellii and Protea foliosa for example) and the resprout-
ing ability of virtually all the species found in Grassy
Fynbos indicate that it should be recognized as a distinct
vegetation type. Campbell (1985) proposed that the
Grassy Fynbos (Eastern Fynbos) of the Zuurberg and
Grahamstown areas should be included in the Fynbos
Biome and perhaps also in the Cape Floristic Region.
The abundance of grasses was discussed by Cowling
(1984). He suggested that high temperatures during the
growing season (the high proportion of summer rain) in-
crease the competitive advantage of C4 grasses, although
the more fertile and finer-textured soils (Campbell 1983)
also need to be considered. Too frequent fires may lead
to an increase in grassiness by removing the shading effect
of the overstorey. It is possible that longer intervals be-
tween fires will result in an increase of Mountain Fynbos
in certain areas.
220
CONCLUSIONS
In the Zuurberg National Park several totally differ-
ent and unrelated vegetation types occur in close proxi-
mity. The dynamics of the boundaries between the types
and between communities need to be studied in more
detail to explain the intricate mosaic of vegetation. Com-
munity boundaries may be determined at least partly by
an equally intricate mosaic of soil types. Campbell (1983)
has reported distinct edaphic gradients in the mountains
of the Fynbos Biome. Another major ecological factor
seems to be the natural fire cycle, in which the warmer,
drier northern slopes tend to burn at more frequent
intervals than the wet southern slopes. Fire is considered
to be the major disturbance factor in fynbos biome com-
munities (Cowling et al. 1987).
If the present-day patchy distribution of plant com-
munities has been shaped by edaphic factors and a natural
fire regime, little seems to be gained by interfering with
the natural cycle. It is indeed impractical to divide such
complex communities into conventional ‘burning blocks’
and burn them according to a rigid schedule. Instead,
management should try to allow lightning fires to run
their natural course, and exclude man-made fires from
outside the Park. Further research is required to assess
this policy, focusing on post-fire succession and the
effects of fire on the characteristic and dominant species
in each vegetation unit. It is also important to gain infor-
mation on the extent to which edaphic factors are re-
sponsible for community boundaries.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Nico and Sorina van der Walt for their hos-
pitality during our visits. Financial support from the
National Parks Board and the Rand Afrikaans University
is acknowledged.
REFERENCES
ACOCKS, J.P.H. 1953. Veld types of South Africa. Memoirs of
the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 28.
ARCHIBALD, E.E.A. 1955. An ecological survey of the Addo
Elephant National Park. Journal of South African Botany
20: 137-154.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
BREYTENBACH, G.J. & VLOK, J. 1985. The Suurberg National
Park: management options. Saasveld Forestry Research
Centre, George. Unpublished.
CAMPBELL, B.M. 1983. Montane plant environments in the
Fynbos Biome. Bothalia 14: 283-298.
CAMPBELL, B.M. 1985. A classification of the mountain vegeta-
tion of the Fynbos Biome. Memoirs of the Botanical Sur-
vey of South Africa No. 50.
CHARLTON, J.S. 1982. Report on activities at Suurberg State
Forest, June 1981 to June 1982. Saasveld College for
Foresters, George. Unpublished.
COWLING, R.M. 1983a. Phytochorology and vegetation history
in the south-eastern Cape, South Africa. Journal of Bio-
geography 10: 393-419.
COWLING, R.M. 1983b. Diversity relations in Cape shrublands
and other vegetation in the south-eastern Cape, South
Africa. Vegetatio 54: 103-127.
COWLING, R.M. 1984. A syntaxonomic and synecological study
in the Humansdorp region of the Fynbos Biome. Bothalia
15: 175-227.
COWLING, R.M., LE MAITRE, D.C., MCKENZIE, B., PRYS-
JONES, R.P. & VAN WILGEN, B.W. 1987. Disturbance
and the dynamics of fynbos biome communities. South
African National Scientific Programmes Report No. 135.
CSIR, Pretoria.
EVERARD, D.A. 1987. A classification of the subtropical tran-
sitional thicket in the eastern Cape, based on syntaxono-
mic and structural attributes. South African Journal of
Botany 53: 329-340.
GELDENHUYS, C.J. 1985. Ekologie, beplanning en bestuur van
inheemse woudplantegroei in the Suurberg Nasionale Park.
Saasveld Forestry Research Centre, George. Unpublished.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E. & ROBINSON, E.R. 1981. Phytogeo-
graphy and speciation in the vegetation of the eastern
Cape. Bothalia 13: 467-472.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1978. An analysis of the flora of southern
Africa: its characteristics, relationships and origins. An-
nals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 65 : 369-436.
KRUGER, F.J. 1979. South African heathlands. In R.L. Specht,
Heathlands of the world. A. Descriptive studies'. 19-79.
Elsevier, Amsterdam.
LUBKE, R.A., EVERARD, D.A. & JACKSON, S. 1986. The
biomes of the eastern Cape with emphasis on their conser-
vation. Bothalia 16: 251-261.
STEHLE, T.C. 1979. Brandbeskermings- en beheerde brandplan
vir die Suurberg Staatsbos. Eastern Cape Forestry Region,
King Williams Town. Unpublished.
TAYLOR, H.C. 1978. Capensis. In M.J.A. Werger, Biogeography
and ecology of southern Africa'. 171-230. Junk, The
Hague.
VAN WYK, B-E., VAN WYK, C.M. & NOVELLIE, P.A. 1988.
Flora of the Zuurberg National Park. 2. An annotated
checklist of ferns and seed plants. Bothalia 18: 221-232.
WHITE, F., 1978. The Afromontane region. In M.J.A. Werger,
Biogeography and ecology of southern Africa'. 463-513.
Junk, The Hague.
Bothalia 18,2: 221-232 (1988)
Flora of the Zuurberg National Park. 2. An annotated checklist of ferns
and seed plants
B-E. VAN WYK*, C.M. VAN WYK** and P.A. NOVELLIEt
Keywords: checklist, eastern Cape, flora, growth form, plant distribution
ABSTRACT
A checklist of 1 100 plant taxa representing 540 genera and 129 families is given for the Zuurberg National Park
(eastern Cape). Annotations include growth form (except in Poaceae and Cyperaceae) and voucher specimen(s).
The diversity of the flora is ascribed to the presence of four major phytochoria of southern Africa rather than
local endemism.
UITTREKSEL
’n Kontrolelys van 1 100 planttaksons, wat 540 genusse en 129 families verteenwoordig, word vir die Zuur-
berg Nasionale Park (Oos-Kaap) aangegee. Groeivorms (behalwe by Poaceae en Cyperaceae) en kontrole-eksemplare
word ook aangetoon. Die diversiteit van die flora word toegeskryf aan die teenwoordigheid van vier hoofplante-
groeistreke van suidelike Afrika eerder as aan plaaslike endemisme.
INTRODUCTION
The study area is situated in the eastern Cape, which
is known to be a transitional zone of four major phyto-
choria, namely the Cape, Tongoland-Pondoland, Karoo-
Namib and Afromontane regions (Goldblatt 1978; Gibbs
Russell & Robinson 1981; Cowling 1983; Lubkeefa/.
1986). Furthermore, five vegetation types are represent-
ed in this area. It is therefore of considerable phytogeo-
graphical interest.
The vegetation of the Zuurberg National Park was
studied to supply basic data for an inventory. Major
vegetation units are described by Van Wyk etal. (1988)
and all ferns and flowering plants recorded within the
boundaries of the Park are listed. No comprehensive
studies or systematic collecting work have been done
here in the past.
METHODS
Herbarium specimens were collected on several visits
between June 1985 and October 1987. The staff of the
National Herbarium and various specialists identified the
material. A field herbarium was compiled to provide a
permanent record of all plant taxa and to facilitate future
studies. Duplicates of the specimens are housed in the
Rand Afrikaans University Herbarium (JRAU) and in
the National Herbarium (PRE) of the Botanical Research
Institute, Pretoria.
The nomenclature and arrangement of the checklist
follow Gibbs Russell et al. (1985, 1987). Collecting
* Department of Botany, Rand Afrikaans University, P.O. Box
524, Johannesburg 2000.
** Botanical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and
Water Supply, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001.
t National Parks Board, Private Bag X66, Cradock 5880, South
Africa.
MS. received: 1987.12.28.
numbers, all by B-E. & C.M. van Wyk, are shown in
italics. Growth forms are mentioned, except in Poaceae
and Cyperaceae. Naturalized exotic species are marked
with an asterisk. Exact localities are not cited, but all
collections are from the following quarter degree square
grids: 3325 (Port Elizabeth): —AD, — BC, — BD.
RESULTS
A total of 1 100 species and infraspecific taxa repre-
senting 540 genera and 129 families, was recorded in the
study area (Table 1). Naturalized exotic species represent
5,6% of the total flora, a figure much lower than the
10% given by Gibbs Russell & Robinson (1981) for the
Albany and Bathurst Districts. The largest families are
the Asteraceae (62 genera, 148 species) and the Poaceae
(51 genera, 90 species). Nearly all of the largest families
of southern Africa (Gibbs Russell 1985) are also present
amongst the 50 largest families of the Zuurberg. Only
the Mesembryanthemaceae and the Ericaceae are ranked
significantly lower in the Zuurberg flora than in the
southern African flora as a whole (Gibbs Russell 1985,
Table 3).
TABLE 1. — Number of families, genera and species recorded in
the Zuurberg National Park
222 Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
TABLE 2. — Comparison of the flora of the Zuurberg National Park with other southern African floras (data from Gibbs Russell 1985)
The diversity of the flora is compared to other south-
ern African floras in Table 2. The Zuurberg National
Park is much smaller than the other areas mentioned in
Table 2. However, more vegetation types are represented
than in the other regional floras mentioned (Van Wyk et
al. 1988) and a comparable number of families and genera
is present. Although the number of species per km2 is
very high, the total number of species and the species/
genus ratio are lower. Endemic genera typically have
high species/ genus ratios. A mean of 8,6 for all endemic
genera in southern Africa is given by Gibbs Russell &
Robinson (1981). A lack of distribution records from
many of the quarter degree grid squares of the eastern
Cape makes it very difficult to accurately assess the
degree of endemism. Lubke et al. (1986) have concluded
that endemism in the eastern Cape is relatively low com-
pared to other centres. Their results have indicated that
most endemics (61) are from the thicket vegetation of
the Tongaland-Pondoland region, with the Cape region
(59) a close second. The diversity of the flora of the
Zuurberg National Park is ascribed not so much to
endemism or to a large number of species, but rather to
the presence of five vegetation types and the relatively
high number of higher order taxa (families and genera),
each of which contribute a relatively low number of
species.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We wish to thank the Director and staff of the National
Herbarium for the many specimens that were identified.
The following specialists have also contributed to iden-
tifications: A. Bean, K. Balkwill, H.P. Linder, R.O. Mof-
fett, A.A. Obermeyer-Mauve, E.G.H. Oliver, C.H. Stirton
and A.E. van Wyk. We also wish to thank the following
persons who helped us in various ways: H. Allison, R.M.
Cowling, M. Fourie, L. Jonker, M.Koekemoer, G.Kotze,
R.A. Lubke, R. Niemand, E. Novellie, E.M. Reinten, A.L.
Schutte, N. van der Walt, S. van der Walt and K.T. van
Warmelo. Financial support from the National Parks
Board and the Rand Afrikaans University is acknow-
ledged.
REFERENCES
COWLING, R.M. 1983. Phytochorology and vegetation history
in the south-eastern Cape, South Africa. Journal of Bio-
geography 10: 393-419.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E. 1985. Analysis of the size and composi-
tion of the southern African flora. Bothalia 15: 613 —
629.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E. & ROBINSON, E.R. 1981. Phytogeogra-
phy and speciation in the vegetation of the eastern Cape.
Bothalia 13: 467-472.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., REID, C., VAN ROOY, J. & SMOOK,
L. 1985. List of species of southern African plants, edn 2,
part 1. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa
No. 51.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., WELMAN, W.G., RETIEF, E., IMMEL-
MAN, K.L., GERMISHUIZEN, G., PIENAAR, B.J., VAN
WYK, M. & NICHOLAS, A. 1987. List of species of south-
ern African plants, edn 2, part 2. Memoirs of the Botanical
Survey of South Africa No. 56.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1978. An analysis of the flora of southern
Africa: its characteristics, relationships and origins. Annals
of the Missouri Botanical Garden 65: 369-436.
LUBKE, R.A., EVERARD, D.A. & JACKSON, S. 1986. The
biomes of the eastern Cape with emphasis on their conser-
vation. Bothalia 16: 251-261.
VAN WYK, B-E., NOVELLIE, P.A. & VAN WYK, C.M. 1988.
Flora of the Zuurberg National Park. 1. Characterization
of major vegetation units. Bothalia 18: 211—220.
CHECKLIST
The nomenclature and arrangement of the checklist follow Gibbs Russell et al. (1985, 1987). Collecting numbers, all by B. & M.
van Wyk, are shown in italics. Growth forms are mentioned, except in ferns, Poaceae and Cyperaceae. Naturalized exotic species are
marked with an asterisk. Exact localities are not cited, but all collections are from the following quarter degree square grids: 3325
(Port Elizabeth): -AD, -BC, -BD.
PTERIDOPHYTA
EQUISETACEAE
Equisetum ramosissimum Desf, 1963
OSMUNDACEAE
Todea barbara (L.) T. Moore, 21 73
SCHIZAEACEAE
Mohria caffrorum (L.) Desv., 231, 340
Schizaea pectinata (L.) Swartz, 183, 1283, 1517
DENNSTAEDTIACEAE
Pteridium aquilinum (L.J Kuhn subsp. aquilinum, 228a
ADLANTACEAE
Adiantum
capillus-veneris L., 326
raddianum Presl, 331
Cheilanthes
capensis (Thunb.) Swartz, 1378
concolor (Langsd & Fisch.) Schelpe & N.C. Anthony, 777,
1088
hirta Swartz, 1768, 1886
multifida (Swartz) Swartz var. multifida, 1238
parviloba (Swartz) Swartz, 482, 1086
viridis (Forssk.) Swartz
var. macrophylla (Kuntze) Schelpe & N.C. Anthony, 334
var. viridis, 369, 642, 695, 1083, 1087
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
223
Pellaea calomelanos (Swartz) Link, 703, 964
Pteris dentata Forssk., 337
POLYPODIACEAE
Pleopeltis macrocarpa (Bory ex Willd) Kaulf, 749, 1084
ASPLENIACEAE
Asplenium
lunulatum Swartz, 349, 795, 1655
rutifolium (Berg.) Kunze, 1 77
splendens Kunze, 350
Ceterach cordatum (Thunb.) Desv., 339, 1356
THELYPTERIDACEAE
Thelypteris bergiana (Schlechtd) Ching, 769
LOMARIOPSIDACEAE
Elaphoglossum acrostichoides (Hook. <6 Grev.) Schelpe, 1 085
ASPIDIACEAE
Dryopteris inaequalis (Schlechtd.) Kuntze, 347
Rumohia adiantiformis (G. Forst.) Ching, 168
BLECHNACEAE
Blechnum
australe L. var. australe, 766, 1240
capense (L.) Schlechtd., 765, 2171
punctulatum Swartz var. punctulatum, 352, 1239
GYMNOSPERMAE
ZAMIACEAE
Encephalartos
caffer (Thunb.) Lehm., shrub, 2161
lehmannii Lehm., shrub, 626
longifolius (Jacq.) Lehm., small tree, 233
PODOCARPACEAE
Podocarpus
falcatus (Thunb.) R. Br. ex Mirb., tree, 753
latifolius (Thunb.) R. Br. ex Mirb., tree, 82
CUPRESSACEAE
Widdringtonia nodiflora (L.) Powrie, shrub or small tree, 200
ANGIOSPERMAE — MONOCOTYLEDONEAE
TYPHACEAE
Typha capensis (Rohrb.) N.E. Br., forb, 1629
POTAMOGETONACEAE
Potamogeton thunbergii Cham. & Schlechtd., aquatic forb, 238
APONOGETONACEAE
Aponogeton desertorum Zeyh. ex Spreng. f, aquatic forb, 1 985
POACEAE
Hemarthria altissima (Poir.) Stapf & C.E. Hubb., 1984
Elionurus muticus (Spreng.) Kunth, 1095b, 1120, 1287
Miscanthus
erectus (Stent & C.E. Hubb.) ined, 1480
sorghum (Nees) Pilg., 1584
Andropogon appendiculatus Nees, 1054, 1277
Cymbopogon
plurinodis (Stapf) Stapf ex Burtt Davy, 86 7
validus (Stapf) Stapf ex Burtt Davy, 707, 1196, 1200, 1318
Hyparrhenia
anamesa Clayton, 639, 1197
hirta (L.) Stapf, 1141
Trachypogon spicatus (L. f.) Kuntze, 1100
Heteropogon contortus (L.) Roem. & Schult., 669, 999, 1099
Diheteropogon filifolius (Nees) Clayton, 656, 1105, 1199
Themeda triandra Forssk., 6 73
Digitaria
eriantha Steud., 997, 1320, 1392
monodactyla (Nees) Stapf, 974, 1014, 1095a, 1424
natalensis Stent, 1126
Alloteropsis semialata (R. Br.) Hitchc. subsp. eckloniana (Nees)
Gibbs Russell, 611, 983, 1108
Brachiaria
arrecta (Dur. & Schinz) Stent, 1587b
serrata (Thunb.) Stapf, 995, 1143, 1340
Paspalum
dilatatum Poir., 1046, 1109*
paspaloides (Michx.) Scribm, 1587a
scrobiculatum L., 1043
Urochloa panicoides Beauv., 1764, 1941
Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv., 1955
Oplismenus sp., 1090, 1898
Panicum
coloratum L. var. coloratum, 1 741
deustum Thunb., 760, 978, 1398
ecklonii Nees, 1717
gilvum Launert, 1042, 1586
maximum Jacq., 963, 989, 1142, 1360, 1548
subalbidum Kunth, 2033
Setaria
lindenbergiana (Nees) Stapf, 891, 1323
sphacelata (Schumach.) Moss
var. sphacelata, 1366
var. torta (Stapf) Clayton, 965, 1198
Rhynchelytrum nerviglume (French.) Chiov., 218, 675, 969, 1503
Pennisetum macrourum Trim , 1220, 1988
Cenchrus ciliaris L., 1821
Ehrharta
calycina J.E. Sm. var. calycina, 1185, 1202b
erecta Lam. var. erecta, 1203, 1268
ramosa (Thunb.) Thunb. var. ramosa, 1223, 1276
cf. longifoha Schrad, 1274
Phalaris
arundinacea L., 1978*
minor Retz, 1918*
Arundinella nepalensis Trim, 2148
Tristachya leucothrix Nees, 66 7, 998
Helictotrichon hirtulum (Steud.) Schweick., 1053, 1102, 1265
Merxmuellera
arundinacea (Berg) Conert, 1836
disticha (Nees) Conert, 2101
stricta (Schrad) Conert, 865, 2053, 2102
Karroochloa curva (Nees) Conert £ Turpe, 135 7
Pentaschistis
ampla (Nees) McClean, 1060
angustifolia (Nees) Stapf, 1028, 1101, 1155, 1186, 1254, 1273
curvifolia (Schrad) Stapf, 1263, 1264
eriostoma (Nees) Stapf, 1316, 1837
Phragmites australis (Cav.) Steud, 1989
Agrostis lachnantha Nees var. lachnantha, 763a, 889
Polypogon monspeliensis (L.) Desf, 888*
Aristida
congesta Roem. & Schult. subsp. barbicollis (Trim & Rupr.) De
Winter, 1847
diffusa Trim subsp. burkei (Stapf) Meld., 863, 987, 1328
junciformis Trim & Rupr. subsp. junciformis, 1510
Stipa dregeana Steud var. elongata (Nees) Stapf 96 7, 1149, 1408,
1652
Tragus berteronianus Schult., 1363
Sporobolus
africanus (Poir.) Robyns & Toumay, 1050
centrifugus (Trim) Nees, 2108
fimbriatus (Trim) Nees var. fimbriatus, 1153, 1359
mauritianus (Steud.) Dur. & Schinz, 2068, 2105
natalensis (Steud) Dur. <6 Schinz, 1029
nitens Stent, 1386
Eragrostis
capensis (Thunb.) Trim, 471, 709, 742, 1271
cilianensis (AIL) F.T. Hubb., 1399, 1416
curvula (Schrad) Nees, 980, 1032, 1148, 1746
obtusa Munro ex FicaL & Hiem, 1093, 1145, 1391
plana Nees, 1065
planiculmis Nees, 242, 1052, 1057, 1218, 1221
racemosa (Thunb.) Steud, 281, 1037, 1098
Microchloa caffra Nees, 1269
Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers., 1048, 1106, 1107, 1255
Harpochloa falx (L. f.) Kuntze, 1187
Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertm subsp. africana (K.-OByme) Hilu
& De Wet, 1942
Triraphis andropogonoides (Steud.) PhilL, 131 7
Koeleria capensis (Steud) Nees, 1272, 1970, 1980
Melica racemosa Thunb., 994, 1202a, 1545
Schismus barbatus (Loefl ex L.) ThelL, 923
224
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
Poa binata Nees, 2100
Festuca
costata Nees var. costata, 2098
scabra Vahl, 1665, 1723
Bromus unioloides H. B. K„ 1266, 1904, 1959*
Brachypodium flexum Nees, 262
Lolium rigidum Gaudin, 1 950*
CYPERACEAE
Carpha glomerata (Thunb.) Nees, 1233
Cyperus
albostriatus Schrad., 230, 972, 1939
denudatus L. f, 1044, 1585
difformis L., 1396
maiginatus Thunb., 929, 1806
obtusiflorus Vahl vai. sphaerocephalus (Vahl) Kuekenth., 1056
pulcher Thunb., 1 777, 1 778
rubicundus Vahl, 1393
sphaerosperm us Schrad., 1946
tenellus L. f. var. tenellus, 203 7b
textilis Thunb., 322
usitatus Burch., 1394
Pycreus polystachyos (Rottb.) Beauv., 1613
Mariscus
dregeanus Kunth, 1138
indecorus (Kunth) Podlech, 990
solidus (Kunth) ined.
vai. solidus, 1 792
var. involutus (C.B. Cl) ined., 1121
tabularis (Schrad.) C.B. Cl subsp. major (Nees) ined., 1397,
1770
uitenhagensis Steud., 977
usitatus (Burch.) ined. var usitatus, 1394
Ficinia
albicans Nees, 1827
quinquangularis Boeck., 1846
sylvatica Kunth, 1889
Fuirena hirsuta (Berg.) P.L. Forbes, 1579, 1956, 2143
Schoenoplectus paludicola (Kunth) Palla ex J. Raynal, 232, 2031
Isolepis
cemua (Vahl) Roem. <£ Schult., 896
ludwigii Kunth, 1673
prolifer R. Br., 783
sepulcralis Steud., 214, 881, 2037a
Eleocharis dregeana Steud, 2032
Fimbristylis complanata (Retz.) Link, 1047
Bulbostylis
contexta (Nees) Bodard, 1000, 1097
humilis (Kunth) C.B. CL, 1003
Abildgaardia ovata (Burm. f.) Krai., Femiebrae plot A 1
Tetraria
bromoides (Lam.) Pfeiffer, 2158
compressa Turrill, 264
cuspidata (Rottb.) C.B. CL, 357, 677, 744
fourcadei Turrill & Schonl., 2058
pubescens Schonl. & Turrill, 151 9
secans C.B. CL, 1520
sp. nov., 1499
Schoenoxiphium
lehmannii (Nees) Steud., 1735
rufum Nees, 21 79
sparteum (Wahlenb.) C.B. CL, 1049, 1506, 1471
Carex
cf. aethiopica Schkuhr, 1631
clavata Thunb., 1979
ARACEAE
Zantedeschia aethiopica (L.) Spreng., forb, 752a
LEMNACEAE
Lemna gibba L., aquatic forb, 934a
Wolffia arrhiza (L.) Horkel ex Wimm., aquatic forb, 934b
RESTIONACEAE
Ischyrolepis sieberi (Kunth) Linder, 2059, 2060, 2167
Elegia vaginulata Mast., 1521
Restio
sejunctus Mast., 1515
triticeus Rothb., 9, 267, 359
Calopsis paniculata (Rottb.) Desv., 2157
Rhodocoma
capensis Nees ex Steud., 125, 179, 1338, 1727, 2047
fruticosa (Thunb.) Linder, 420, 1 728
Cannomois virgata (Rottb.) Steud, 2046
Hypodiscus
striatus (Kunth) Mast., 268, 762, 768, 1514
synchroolepis (Steud.) Mast., 236
sp., 2182
COMMELINACEAE
Commelina
africana L.
var. africana, forb, 1658
var. krebsiana (Kunth) C.B. CL, forb, 944
var. lancispatha C.B. CL, forb, 946, 1390
benghalensis L„ forb, 948
eckloniana Kunth, forb, 1079, 1384
Cyanotis speciosa (L. f.) Hassk., forb, 992, 1286, 1379
JUNCACEAE
Prionium serratum (L. f.) Drkge ex E. Mey., large tuft, 2142
Juncus
capensis Thunb., tuft, 937
exsertus Buchen., tuft, 892
lomatophyllus Spreng., tuft, 1628
oxycarpus E. Mey. ex Kunth, tuft, 1 765, 2034
LILIACEAE
Bulbine
abyssinica A. Rich., succulent, 1068
asphodeloides (L.) Willd, succulent, 1677
filifolia Bak., forb, 1176
frutescens (L.) Willd, succulent, 323, 2150
cf. lagopus (Thunb.) N.E. Br., succulent, 2111
latifolia (L. f.) Roem. & Schult., succulent, 134
Trachyandra
affinis Kunth, forb, 21 77
asperata Kunth.
var. macowanii (Bak.) Oberm., forb, 1661
var. stenophylla (Bak.) Oberm., forb, 1055
gif fenii (Leighton) Oberm., forb, 1795
saltii (Bak.) Oberm. var. saltii, forb, 1707
Anthericum sp., forb, 21 77
Chlorophytum
capense (L.) Koss, forb, 1122
comosum (Thunb.) Jacq., forb, 1760, 1897
Caesia contorta (L. f.) Dur. <6 Schinz, forb, 1013
Schizobasis intricata (Bak.) Bak., geophyte, 1313, 1541
Eriospermum
dyeri Mar loth ex Archib., geophyte, 1312
sp. cf. E. occultum Archib., geophyte, 1475, 1022b, 2125
Kniphofia cf. uvaria (L.) Hook., forb, 370, 1429
Aloe
ferox Mill, large succulent, 156
microcantha Haw., succulent, 1224, 2156
pluridens Haw., large succulent, 1644
speciosa Bak., large succulent, 710
striata Haw., succulent, 621
tenuior Haw., scandent succulent, 40, 405
Gasteria sp., succulent, 2023
Haworthia
angustifolia Haw., succulent, 693, 1249, 1311
cooperi Bak. var. cooperi, succulent, 623, 734
glauca Bak. var. glauca, succulent, 732
reinwardtii (Salm-Dyck) Haw.
var. reinwardtii, succulent, 485
cf. var. brevicula G. G. Sm. , succulent, 1546
Agapanthus praecox Willd. subsp. minimus (Lindl.) Leighton, forb,
637, 1458
Tulbaghia
cemua Ave-Lall., geophyte, 1127, 1726
violacea Harv., forb, 1531
Albuca
sp. cf. A. macowanii Bak., geophyte, 691, 2151
sp., geophyte, 2107
Urginea altissima (L. f.) Bak., geophyte, 1423h, 1742
Drimia
anomala (Bak.) Benth., geophyte, 1843
capensis (Burm. f.) Wijnands, geophyte, 1315
sp., geophyte, 2011
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
225
Rhadamanthus sp. nov.?, geophyte, 1858
Dipcadi viride (L.) Moench, geophyte, 722, 2003
Litanthus pusillus Harv., geophyte, 1571
Scilla nervosa (Burch.) Jessop, geophyte, 1010
Eucomis autumnalis (Mill) Chitt. subsp. autumnalis, geophyte,
2126
Omithogalum
anguinum Leighton ex Oberm., geophyte, 1653
conicum Jacq. subsp. conicum, geophyte, 1 722
juncifolium Jacq., geophyte, 1022a, 1188, 1842
rogersii Bak. , geophyte, 1890
Ledebouria
revoluta (L. f.) Jessop, geophyte, 1690
undulata (Jacq.) Jessop, geophyte, 692
Veltheimia bracteata Harv. ex Bak., geophyte, 1801, 2202
Sansevieria hyacinthoides (L.) Druce, forb, 630
Protasparagus
aethiopicus (L.) Oberm., climber, 536, 1636
burchellii (Bak.) Oberm., forb, 561
capensis (L.) Oberm., forb, 406
crassicladus (Jessop) Oberm., climber, 578, 806
densiflorus (Kunth) Oberm., forb, 521, 6 76
divaricatus Oberm., forb, 415
laricinus (Burch.) Oberm., forb, 646
macowanii (Bak.) Oberm., forb, 408, 1593
multiflorus (Bak.) Oberm., climber, 1614
setaceus (Kunth) Oberm., climber, 112, 341
striatus (L. f.) Oberm., forb, 116, 235, 519
suaveolens (Burch. ) Oberm., forb, 88, 364
subulatus (Thunb.) Oberm., forb, 555
virgatus (Bak.) Oberm., forb, 18, 343
Behnia reticulata (Thunb.) Didr., forb, 69
HAEMODORACEAE
Lanark lanata (L.) Dur. & Schinz, forb, 1034
AMARYLLIDACEAE
Haemanthus albiflos Jacq. , geophyte, 162, 1575
Scadoxus puniceus (L.) Friis & Nordal, geophyte, 1229
Boophane disticha (L. f.) Herb., geophyte, 694
Nerine undulata (L.) Herb, complex, geophyte, 1625
Brunsvigia grandiflora LindL, geophyte, 1470
Cyrtanthus sanguineus (LindL) Walp., geophyte, 2016
HYPOXIDACEAE
Empodium sp., geophyte, 1489
Hypoxis
angustifolia Lam. var. buchananii Bak., geophyte, 1944
hemerocallidea Fisch. & Mey., geophyte, 1008
longifolia Bak., geophyte, 1250, 1257
obtusa Burch, ex Edwards, geophyte, 862a
rigidula Bak. var. rigidula, geophyte, 1036, 2039
cf. villosa L. f., geophyte, 862
zeyheri Bak., geophyte, 1260
TECOPHILAEACEAE
Cyanella sp., geophyte, 802
DIOSCOREACEAE
Dioscorea cf. sylvatica (Kunth) Eckl, geophyte, 478
IRIDACEAE
Romulea autumnalis L. BoL, geophyte, 219
Moraea
cf. algoensis GoldbL, geophyte, 2043
cf. elliotii Bak., geophyte, 1710
tripetala (L. f.) Ker-GawL, geophyte, 2180
Dietes iridioides (L.) Sweet ex Klatt, forb, 1761
Bobartia orientalis J.B. Gillett subsp. orientalis, forb, 379, 2113
Aristea
anceps Eckl. ex Klatt, forb, 1020, 1245
cognata N.E. Br. ex Weim., forb, 1247
ecklonii Bak., forb, 1683
juncifolia Bak. , forb, 1509
schizolaena Harv., forb, 1123, 1259, 1696
Dierama pendulum Bak., geophyte, 17, 2138
Gladiolus ochroleucus Bak. var. macowanii (Bak.) Oberm., geo-
phyte, 1428
Anapalina caffra (Ker-GawL ex Bak.) G.J. Lewis, geophyte, 2
Watsonia cf. longifolia Mathews & L. BoL, geophyte, 658, 713
Freesia corymbosa (Burm. f.) N.E. Br., geophyte, 71 7
ORCHIDACEAE
Habenaria cf. arenaria LindL, forb, 1596, 1611
Brachycorythis macowaniana Reichb. f, forb, 1998
Disa versicolor Reichb. f. , forb, 2203
Satyrium membranaceum Swartz, forb, 1 720
Monadenia brevicomis LindL, forb, 1 706
Disperis lindleyana Reichb. f, forb, 1598
Acrolophia capensis (Berg.) Fourc. var. capensis, forb, 1691, 1999
Polystachya pubescens Reichb. f, epiphyte, 1163
Eulophia
clavicomis LindL var. clavicomis, forb, 65 7, 789
platypetala LindL, forb, 662
tenella Reichb. f, forb, 1177, 1190
Tridactyle tricuspis (H. BoL) Schltr., epiphyte, 1590, 2014
Cyrtorchis arcuata (LindL) Schltr., epiphyte, 2013
Mystacidium
capense (L. f.) Schltr., epiphyte, 2012
venosum Harv. ex Rolfe, epiphyte, 164
ANGIOSPERMAE — DICOTYLEDONEAE
PIPERACEAE
Peperomia tetraphylla (G. Forst.) Hook. & Am., forb, 72, 325
SALICACEAE
Salix capensis Thunb. var. capensis, tree, 295, 884
MYRICACEAE
Myrica
cordifolia L., shrub, 249
div ersifolia Adamson, shrub, 490
humilis Cham. & Schlechtd, shrub, 679
kraussiana Buchinger ex Meisn, shrub, 786
serrata Lam., shrub, 377, 837
ULMACEAE
Celtis africana Burm. f., tree, 110
Chaetacme aristata Planch., tree, 81, 293
MORACEAE
Ficus
burtt-davyi Hutch., tree, 962
ingens (Miq.) Miq. var. ingens, shrub or tree, 145, 705
sur Forssk., tree, 126, 1504
URTICACEAE
Laportea grossa (Wedd) Chew, forb, 1206, 1602
Didymodoxa caffra (Thunb.) Friis & Wilmot-Dear, forb, 1407
PROTEACEAE
Protea
cynaroides (L.) L., shrub, 319
foliosa Rourke, shrub, 98
lorifolia (Salisb. ex Knight) Fourc. , shrub or small tree, 258, 636
repens (L.) L., shrub, 1554
Leucospermum cuneiforme (Burm. f.) Rourke, shrub, 1, 614
Leucadendron salignum Berg., shrub, 41, 1278, 1325
VISCACEAE
Viscum
minimum Harv., epiphytic parasite, sight record
rotundifolium L. f., epiphytic parasite, 74
SANTALACEAE
Colpoon compressum Berg., small tree, 21, 202
Rhoiacarpos capensis (Harv.) DC., shrub, 1919
Thesium
disciflorum A. W. Hill, shrublet, 793, 1695
flexuosum A. DC., shrublet, 187, 609
fruticosum A. W. Hill, shrublet, 184
gnidiaceum A. DC., shrublet, 1716
junceum Bemh., shrublet, 832, 1296
pallidum A. DC., shrublet, 846
cf. squarrosum L. f., shrublet, 604, 1258
strictum Berg. , erect shrub, 97, 606, 1341
virgatum Lam., shrublet, 221, 353
POLYGONACEAE
Emex australis Steinh., forb, 1355*
226
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
Rumex
crispusZ,., forb, 1915*
cf. nepalensis Spreng., forb, 2127*
cf. sagittatus Thunb., forb, 1932
Polygonum
aviculare L., forb, 1972*
lapathifolium L. subsp. maculatum (S.F. Gray) T.-Dyer& Trim.,
forb, 1937
salicifolium Willd., forb, 338, 936
Bilderdykia convolvulus (L.) Dumort, twining forb, 1916*
CHENOPODIACEAE
Chenopodium
carinatum R. Br., forb, 918, 1091*
mucronatum Thunb., forb, 1404
Exomis microphylla (Thunb.) Aell. var. axyrioides ( Fenzl ) Aell.,
shrub, 1261
Salsola kali L., forb, 1422*
AMARANTHACEAE
Am ar an thus
hibridus L. subsp. hibridus var. hibridus, forb, 1128*
thunbergii Moq., forb, 1405
Pupaha lappacea (L.) Juss., forb, 1370*
Achyranthes sicula (L.) All., forb, 1635*
Achyropsis
avicularis (E. Mey. ex Moq.) Hook, f., forb, 1082, 1615
leptostachya (E. Mey. ex Meisn.) Hook, f, forb, 981
Gomphrena celosioides Mart., forb, 1414*
AIZOACEAE
Limeum
africanum Burm. subsp. africanum, forb, 1373
telephioides E. Mey. ex Fenzl var. telephioides, forb, 905
Gisekia pharnaceoides L., forb, 1853
Pharnaceum dichotomum L. f, forb, 573, 1973
Galenia
pubescens (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Druce, shrublet, 1 744
sarcophylla Fenzl, shrublet, 1365
secunda (L. f.) Sond., shrublet, 1977
Aizoon
canariense L., forb, 1208
rigidum L. f. var. villosum Adamson, forb, 557
MESEMBRYANTHEMACEAE
Aptenia cordifolia (L. f.) Schwant. var. cordifolia, succulent, 993
1983
Bergeranthus
scapiger (Haw.) N.E. Br., succulent, 810
vespertinus (Berger) Schwant., succulent, 544
Carpobrotus dimidiatus (Haw.) L. Bol., succulent, 486, 612
Delosperma
brevisepalum L. Bol. var. brevisepalum, succulent, 572
cf. cooperi (Hook, f.) L. Bol., succulent, 2072 .
ecklonis (Salm-Dyck) Schwant., succulent, 1374
hirtum (N.E. Br.) Schwant., succulent, 819, 820
laxipetalum L. Bol, succulent, 543a
lehmannii (Eckl. dt Zeyh.) Schwant., succulent, 1967, 1976
cf. testaceum (Haw.) Schwant., succulent, 1354
sp., succulent, 1560
Lampranthus
productus (Haw.) N.E. Br., succulent, 1974
spectabilis (Harv.) N.E. Br. subsp. spectabilis, succulent, 697
1388
Mestoklema tuberosum (L.) N.E. Br. ex Glen, succulent, 814,
1733
Pleiospilos sp.?, succulent, 476
Ruschia
orientalis L. Bol., succulent, 502, 1331, 1542
stenophylla (L.) Bol.) L. Bol., succulent, 254, 1216, 1693
PORTULACACEAE
Anacampseros cf. telephiastrum DC., succulent, 266, 854, 1314
Portulacaria afra Jacq., large succulent, 526
CARYOPHYLLACEAE
Cerastium capense Sond., forb, 1925
Polycarpon tetraphyllum L. f., forb, 882, 1244, 1854, 1921*
Silene
burchellii Otth
var. angustifoha Sond., forb, 1308, 1 703
var. burchellii, forb, 1681
var. pilosellaefolia (Cham. & Schlechtd.) Sond., forb, 1183
gallicaZ., forb, 1671*
Dianthus zeyheri Sond. subsp. natalensis Hooper, forb, 1030
ILLECEBRACEAE
Polhchia campestris/4r'r., forb, 257, 921, 1035, 1438
RANUNCULACEAE
Knowltonia
cordata H. Rasm., forb, 1336, 1500, 2141
vesicatoria (L. f.) Sims subsp. vesicatoria, forb, 1692
Clematis brachiata Thunb., climber, 328
Ranunculus multifidus Forssk., forb, 330
MENISPERMACEAE
Cissampelos torulosa E. Mey. ex Harv., climber, 1899
LAURACEAE
Cassytha
ciliolata Nees, twining parasite, 91
filiformis L, twining parasite, 2165*
PAPAVERACEAE
Argemone subfusiformis G.B. Ownbey, forb, 911*
Papaver aculeatum Thunb., forb, 1958
FUMARIACEAE
Fumaria muralis Sond. ex Koch, twining forb, 1927
BRASSICACEAE
Heliophila
elongata (Thunb.) DC., forb, 1041, 1430
rigidiuscula Sond., forb, 360
trifurca Burch, ex DC., forb, 842
Lepidium africanum (Burm. f.) DC. subsp. africanum, forb, 1818
Coronopus didymus (L.) Sm., forb, 1866*
Sisymbrium
capense Thunb., forb, 1729
orientale L., forb, 1810*
Eruca sativa Mill., forb, 1595*
cf. Diplotaxis muralis (L.) DC., forb, 1776*
Raphanus raphanistrum L., forb, 1928*
Rorippa
fluviatilis (E. Mey. ex Sond.) Thell.
var. caledonica (Sond.) Marais, forb, 1815
var. fluviatilis, forb, 1 752
Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik., forb, 1124*
CAPPARACEAE
Capparis sepiaria L. var. citrifolia (Lam.) Toelken, tall shrub, 137,
140, 807
Boscia oleoides (Burch, ex DC.) Toelken, tree, 825
Cadaba aphylla (Thunb.) Wild, shrub, 1797
Maerua
cafra (DC.) Pax, tree, 752b
racemulosa (DC.) Gilg & Ben., tree, 66
DROSERACEAE
Drosera trinervia Spreng., forb, 1501, 1682
CRASSULACEAE
Cotyledon
campanulata Marloth, succulent, 930
cuneata Thunb., succulent, 1423 e
orbiculata L, succulent, 627, 718
velutina Hook, f., succulent, 761
woodii Schonl. & Bak. f, succulent, 79, 619, 1624b
Kalanchoe rotundifolia (Haw.) Haw., succulent, 133, 817, 1418
Crassula
arborescens (Mill) Willd. subsp. arborescens, succulent shrub,
618
capitella Thunb. subsp. thyrsiflora (Thunb.) Toelken, succulent,
708
cordata Thunb., succulent, 477, 858, 1787
ericoides Haw. subsp. ericoides, succulent, 467, 1306, 1432
expansa (Dryand.) Ait. subsp. expansa, succulent, 815, 1151
1638
lactea Soland., succulent, 52, 624, 1822
latibracteata Toelken, succulent, 640
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
227
mesembryanthemoides (Haw.) Dietr.
subsp. hispida (Haw.) Toelken, 25, 1465
subsp. mesembryanthemoides, succulent, 812, 1565
muscosa L. cf. var. muscosa, succulent, 144
nemorosa (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Endl. ex Ml alp. , succulent, 76
nudicaulis L.
var. nudicaulis, succulent, 1 762
var. platyphylla (Harv.) Toelken, succulent, 49, 209, 796, 855
obovata Haw. var. obovata, succulent, 253, 1464
orbicularis L., succulent, 366, 473
ovata (Mill) Druce, succulent, 1641
pellucida L.
subsp. brachypetala (Drege ex Harv.)Toelken, succulent, 1578
subsp. marginalis (Dryand. in Ait.) Toelken, succulent, 1591,
1642
perfoliata L.
var. coccinea (Sweet) Rowley, succulent, 860a, 1230
var. minor (Haw.) Rowley, succulent, 1426, 1457
var. perfoliata, succulent, 1 783
perforata Thunb., succulent, 444, 540, 1626
pubescens Thunb.
subsp. radicans (Haw.) Toelken, succulent, 816
subsp. rattrayi (Schonl. & Bak. f.) Toelken, succulent, 1421,
156 7
rogersii Schonl., succulent, 1819, 2070
rupestris Thunb. subsp. rupestris, succulent, 37, 151, 260
tetragona L.
subsp. connivens (Schonl.) Toelken, succulent, 1804
subsp. lignescens Toelken, succulent, 1353, 1 772
subsp. robusta (Toelken) Toelken, succulent, 823
vaginata Eckl. & Zeyh. subsp. vaginata, succulent, 1530, 2104
sp. cf. C. capensis (L.) Baill., succulent forb, 1488
Adromischus
cristatus (Haw.) Lem. var. cristatus, succulent, 700, 1481
sphenophyllus C.A. Sm., succulent, 852, 1319
MONTINIACEAE
Montinia caryophyllacea Thunb., shrub, 181
PITTOSPORACEAE
Pittosporum viridiflorum Sims, tree, 150, 792
CUNONIACEAE
Cunonia capensis L., tree, 248
HAMAMELIDACEAE
Trichocladus ellipticus Eckl. & Zeyh. ex Walp., tree, 68, 287
ROSACEAE
Rubus
pinnatus Willd., scandent shrub, 750
rigidus Sm., scandent shrub, 1275
Alchemilla capensis Thunb., forb, 190, 2123
Agrimonia odorata Mill., shrub, 1242*
Cliffortia
burchellii Stapf, shrub, 185
ilicifolia L. var. ilicifolia, shrub, 409
linearifolia Eckl. & Zeyh., shrub, 199, 1305, 2168
paucistaminea Weim., shrub, 250, 421, 746
serpyllifolia Cham. & Schlechtd., shrub, 1502
strobilifera Murray, shrub, 32, 344, 1161
FABACEAE
Acacia
caffra (Thunb.) Willd., tree, 6 7
karroo Hayne, tree, 315
Schotia
afra (L.) Thunb. var. afra, tree, 542
latifolia Jacq., tree, 148, 1833
Calpurnea aurea (Ait.) Benth. subsp. sylvatica (Burch.) Brummitt,
small tree, 528, 1757
Podalyria burchellii DC., shrub, 7, 393, 598, 1433b
Rafnia elliptica Thunb., shrub, 615, 1066
Lotononis
cytisoides (E. Mey.) Benth., shrub, 494
pungens Eckl. & Zeyh., forb, 2196
Asp ala thus
biflora E. Mey. subsp. biflora, shrublet, 701
chortophila Eckl. & Zeyh .
subsp. chortophila, shrub, 101, 171, 988, 1118, 1436
subsp. kougaensis Dahlg., shrub, 468
frankenioides DC., shrub, 207, 428, 1290
lactea Thunb. subsp. adelphea (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Dahlg., shrub,
1564, 1831
laricifolia Berg. , shrub, 845
spinosa L. subsp. spinosa, shrub, 1303, 1440
teres Eckl. <6 Zeyh. subsp. teres, shrub, 431, 1329, 2149
Buchenroedera multiflora Eckl. & Zeyh., shrub, 1478, 1523
Melolobium canescens Benth., shrub, 927
Crotalaria capensis Jacq. , small tree, 1863
Argyrolobium
collinum Eckl. & Zeyh., forb, 645, 1348, 1441, 1535, 1856,
2042
crassifolium Eckl. & Zeyh., shrub, 464, 1522, 1838
molle Eckl. & Zeyh., forb, 1456, 1483, 2131
tomentosum (Andr.) Druce, shrub, 321, 1089, 1358b, 1607
tuberosum Eckl. & Zeyh., forb, 1447
sp. cf. A. pilosum Harv., forb, 1455, 1512, 2132
Medicago laciniata (L.) Mill., forb, 1364
Indigofera
acutisepala Conrath, shrub, 1063, 1894
denudata Thunb., shrub, 94, 234, 495
disticha Eckl. & Zeyh., shrub, 1420, 1619
fastigiata E. Mey., shrub, 1170
hedyantha Eckl. & Zeyh., shrub, 590, 1209, 2065, 2118
heterophylla Thunb., forb, 1349
sessilifolia DC., shrub, 1413
stenophylla Eckl. & Zeyh., shrub, 509, 834, 1326
stipularis Link, forb, 500, 600, 859, 126 7
stricta L. f., shrub, 1205, 1 700, 2164
sp. cf. I. brachystachya E. Mey., shrub, 251
Psoralea
asarina (Berg.) Salter, shrub, 1474, 1492
glabra E. Mey., shrub, 208, 1096, 1179, 149 7, 1581
pinnata L., shrub or small tree, 90, 785
Otholobium prodiens C.H. Stirton, shrub, 270, 774
Tephrosia
capensis (Jacq.) Pers.
var. acutiflora E. Mey., suffrutex, 747
var. angustifolia E. Mey., suffrutex, 152, 696, 1027
var. capensis, suffrutex, 2166
grandiflora (Ait.) Pers., shrub, 2154
macropoda (E. Mey.) Harv., shrub, 1051, 1169
semiglabra Sond., suffrutex, 2009
Sutherland^ frutescens (L.) R. Br., shrub, 2193
Lessertia cf. stenoloba E. Mey., forb, 1811
Zornia capensis Pers., forb, 111 7
Rhynchosia
caribaea (Jacq.) DC., climber, 327, 824, 1383
cooperi (Harv. ex Bak. f.) Bum Davy, climber, 374
totta (Thunb.) DC., forb, 1061, 1130, 1425, 1446, 1487
Eriosema salignum E. Mey., forb, 721, 861, 1039, 1207
Dipogon lignosus (L.) Verde., climber, 1191
GERANIACEAE
Geranium
caffrum Eckl. & Zeyh., forb, 2122
flanaganii Knuth, forb, 2155
incanum Bunn. f. var. multifidum (Sweet) Hilliard & Burtt,
forb, 386
Monsonia emarginata (L. f.) L’Herit., forb, 730, 116 7
Erodium cicutarium (L.) L’Herit. ex Ait., forb, 1809*
Pelargonium
alchemilloides (L.) L’Herit., forb, 758, 1064, 1358a
graveolens L ’Herit., forb ,51,329, 775
cf. grossularioides (L.) L’Herit., forb, 903
heracleifolium Lodd., forb, 1462
luridum (Andr.) Sweet, forb, 1310
multicaule Jacq. var. multicaule, forb, 390, 1529, 1699
odoratissimum (L.) L'Herit., forb, 1643
panduriforme Eckl. & Zeyh., forb, 915
peltatum (L.) L’Herit., creeper, 620, 1561
pulverulentum Colv. ex Sweet, forb, 1335, 1912
quercifolium (L. f.) L’Herit., forb, 913
reniforme Curt. , forb, 205, 396
ribifolium Jacq. , forb, 31, 613, 830
schizopetalum S weet, forb, 1139
sidifolium (Thunb.) Kunth, forb, 1285
zonale (L.) L’Herit., forb, 629
228
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
OXALIDACEAE
Oxalis
bifi urea Lodd, geophyte, 1450, 1524, 2103, 2112
caprina L., geophyte, 1351
comiculata L., geophyte, 1743*
cf. setosa L., geophyte, 1454
smithiana Eckl. <6 Zeyh., geophyte, 1994
stellata EckL & Zeyh., geophyte, 1189
LINACEAE
Linum thunbergii Eckl. & Zeyh., forb, 397, 608, 1445, 1498
ZYGOPHYLLACEAE
Zygophyllum foetidum Schrad & WendL, shrub, 2195
RUTACEAE
Zanthoxylum capense (Thunb.) Harv., tree, 108, 159
Calodendrum capense (L. f.) Thunb., tree, 109
Agathosma
acutissima Duemmer, shrub, 416, 1552
capensis (L.) Duemmer, shrub, 1539
cf. peglerae Duemmer, shrub, 21 91
puberula (Steud.) Fourc., shrub, 567, 828, 1330
venusta (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Pillans, shrub, 269, 354
Coleonema pulchellum I. Williams, shrub, 564, 2001
Vepris lanceolata (Lam.) G. Don, tree, 136
Clausena anisata (Willd) Hook. f. ex Benth., tree, 1592
PTAEROXYLACEAE
Ptaeroxylon obliquum (Thunb.) Radik., tree, 142
MELIACEAE
Melia azedarach L„ tree, 1933*
POLYGALACEAE
Polygala
asbestina Burch., shrublet, 1385, 1774
fruticosa Berg. , shrub, 180, 414
hispida Burch., shrublet, 1204
illepida E. Mey., shrublet, 961, 1104, 1154, 1291, 1511
microlopha DC., shrublet, 1826
myrtifolia L., shrub, 157, 879, 1624a
uncinata E. Mey. ex Meisn., shrublet, 958, 1537
Muraltia
alopecuroides (L.) DC., shrublet, 280, 570, 850, 2163
ericifolia DC., shrub, 191, 426, 1484
EUPHORBIACEAE
Phyllanthus
burchellii Muell. Arg., forb, 950a
maderaspatensis L., forb, 950b
verrucosus Thunb., shrub, 113, 413
Croton rivularis Muell. Arg., tree, 53
Leidesia procumbens (L.) Prain, forb, 782
Acalypha
ecklonii Baill., forb, 907, 979, 1896, 1930
glabrata Thunb. var. glabrata, shrub, 54, 797
peduncularis E. Mey. ex Meisn., forb, 1 724
punctata Meisn., forb, 1125
Ctenomeria capensis (Thunb.) Harv. ex Sond., climber, 2010,
1358c
Dalechampia capensis Spreng. f., climber, 1834
Ricinus communis L., forb, 912*
Jatropha capensis (L. f.) Sond, shrub, 107
Clutia
affinis Sond., shrub, 38
alatemoides L., shrub, 172, 459, 492
ericoides Thunb., shrub, 474
heterophylla Thunb., shrub, 1040
pulchella L., shrub, 41 7
Suregada africana (Sond.) Kuntze, shrub or small tree, 1880
Euphorbia
heptagona L., succulent, 616
kraussiana Bemh. , forb, 104, 754
ledienii Berger, succulent, 527, 826
mauritanica L., succulent, 105
polygona Haw., succulent, 153
cf. pugniformis Boiss., succulent, 1288
silenifolia (Haw.) Sweet, geophyte, 48, 1 94
striata Thunb., forb, 659, 1580
tetragona Haw., succulent tree, 102
triangularis Desf, succulent tree, 631
Chamaesyce inaequilatera (Sond.) Sojak, forb, 883
ANACARDIACEAE
Harpephyllum caffrum Bemh. ex Krauss, tree, 33, 193
Schinus molle L., tree, 2194*
Loxostylis alata Spreng. f. ex Reichb., tree, 154
Rhus
cf. albomarginata Sond., shrub, rare, 866
chirindensis Bak. f forma legatii (Schonl.) R. & A. Fernandes,
tree, 63, 229
dentata Thunb. shrub, 36, 491, 1279
fastigiata Eckl. & Zeyh., shrub, 603, 771, 1298
incisa L. f. var. effusa (Presl) R. Fernandes, tree, 465
lancea L. f., tree, 928
longispina Eckl. & Zeyh., tree, 633, 939
lucida L. forma lucida, shrub, 463, 689
p aliens Eckl. & Zeyh., shrub, 120, 216, 243, 512
pyroides Burch, var. pyroides, tree, 61, 595
refracta Eckl. & Zeyh., tree, 158, 518, 558
rehmanniana Engl. var. uitenhagensis (Eckl. & Zeyh.) ined,
tree, 244
rigida Mill. var. rigida, shrub, 15, 740, 1453
rosmarinifolia Vahl, shrub, 169
AQUIFOLIACEAE
Hex mitis (L.) Radik., tree, 127
CELASTRACEAE
Maytenus
acuminata (L. f.) Loes. var. acuminata, tree, 14, 441
capitata (E. Mey. ex Sond.) Marais, shrub, 551, 1403
heterophylla (Eckl. & Zeyh.) N.K.B. Robson, shrub or tree,
223, 309, 442
linearis (L. f.) Marais, shrub, 2197
nemorosa (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Marais, tree, 56, 62, 316, 440, 1001
undata (Thunb.) Blakelock, tree, 523, 53 7
Putterlickia pyracantha (L.) Szyszyl, shrub, 111, 562, 635, 1402
Pterocelastrus tricuspidatus (Lam.) Sond, shrub or tree, 198, 513,
857, 1656
Cassine
aethiopica Thunb., tree, 246, 302, 534, 856, 1594, 1600
crocea (Thunb.) Kuntze, tree, 529
peragua L., shrub or tree, 85, 306, 446
reticulata (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Codd, shrub, 1115, 1555
tetragona (L. f.) Loes., scandent shrub, 300
Pleurostylia capensis (Turcz.) Oliv., tree, 77, 301, 517a, 1609
ICACINACEAE
Apodytes dimidiata E. Mey. ex Am. subsp. dimidiata, tree, 284
SAPINDACEAE
Allophylus decipiens (Sond) Radik., tree, 95, 457, 1 755
Atalaya capensis R.A. Dyer, tree, 949
Smellophyllum capense Radik., tree, 196
Pappea capensis Eckl. & Zeyh., tree, 132
Dodonaea angustifolia L. /, small tree, 565
Hippobromus pauciflorus (L. f.) Radik., tree, 122, 292
MELIANTHACEAE
Melianthus comosus Vahl, shrub, 879, 919
RHAMNACEAE
Scutia myrtina (Burm. f.) Kurz, woody climber, 149
Noltea africana (L.) Reichb. f., tree, 60
Phylica
axillaris Lam. var. microphylla (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Pillans, shrub,
4, 197,201,411,674, 1241
paniculata Willd., small tree, 273, 429
Helinus integrifolius (Lam.) Kuntze, climber, 1924
VITACEAE
Rhoicissus
digitata (L. f.) Gilg & Brandt, woody climber, 70, 117
tomentosa (Lam.) Wild & Drum., woody climber, 143
tridentata (L. f.) Wild & Drum., woody climber, 13, 333, 438,
589
sp., shrub, 1800
Cyphostemma cirrhosum (Thunb.) Desc. ex Wild & Drum., suc-
culent climber, 922
Both alia 18,2 (1988)
229
TILIACEAE
Grewia
occidentalis L., shiub or small tree, 103, 430, 451
robusta Burch., shrub or small tree, 545, 548
MALVACEAE
Abutilon sonneratianum (Cav.) Sweet, shrub, 556, 1073
Malvastrum coromandelianum (L.j Garcke, shrub, 1 731 *
Sida
dregei Burtt Davy, forb, 947
ternata L. f, forb, 559, 1078
Pavonia praemorsa (L. f.) Cav., shrub, 320, 1612
Hibiscus
aethiopicus L.
var. aethiopicus, forb, 1252
var. angustifolius (Eckl. <t Zeyh.) Exell, forb, 1021
pusillus Thunb., forb, 945, 1081
trionum L., forb, 1178
STERCULIACEAE
Melhania didyma Eckl. & Zeyh., forb, 960, 1080
Herman nia
althaeoides Link, shrublet, 605, 1136
flammula Harv., shrublet, 10
geniculata Eckl. & Zeyh., shrub, 1243
cf. hyssopifolia L., shrub, 895
cf. odorata Ait., shrub, 597
OCHNACEAE
Ochna
arborea Burch, ex DC. var. arborea, tree, 80
natalitia ( Meisn .) Walp., tree, 141, 308
serrulata (Hochst.) Walp., shrub, 379, 666
CLUSIACEAE
Hypericum
aethiopicum Thunb. subsp. aethiopicum, forb, 1302, 1528
lalandii Choisy, forb, 1282, 1494
VIOLACEAE
Hybanthus capensis (Thunb.) Engl., forb, 984, 1025
FLACOURTIACEAE
Scolopia
mundii (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Warb., tree, 135, 435
zeyheri (Nees) Harv., tree, 312, 755, 1648
Homalium
dentatum (Harv.) Warb., tree, new record for the Cape Province,
898, 1851
rufescens Benth., tree, 875, 1236, 1651, 1957
Trimeria trinervis Harv., tree, 34, 96, 1135
Dovyalis
rhamnoides (Burch, ex DC.) Harv., shrub, 298
zeyheri (Sond.) Harv., shrub, 155, 1114, 1647
ACHARIACEAE
Acharia tragodes Thunb., climber, 1756
CACTACEAE
Opuntia
aurantiaca Lindl., succulent forb, invasive, not collected*
ficus-indica (L.) Mill., succulent tree, invasive, not collected*
PENAEACEAE
Penaea cneorum Meerb. subsp. lanceolatum (L.) Dahlg., shrub,
252, 2004, 2170
OLINIACEAE
Olinia ventosa (L.) Cufod, tree, 227, 314, 870, 1620, 1630, 1632
THYMELAEACEAE
Gnidia
anthylloides (L. f.) Gilg., shrub, 43, 182, 1246
capitata L. f, shrub, 1009
coriacea Meisn., shrublet, 3
cuneata Meisn., shrub, 1412
sericea L. var. sericea, shrub, 1 714
thesioides Meisn. var. thesioides, shrub, 59, 571, 1380
Struthiola
argentea Lehm., shrublet, 12, 19, 173
cf. macowanii C.H. Wr., shrublet, 2041
parviflora Bartl. ex Meisn., shrublet, 655, 731
Passerina
falcifolia C.H. Wr., shrub, 2005, 2160
obtusifolia Thoday, shrub, 751
vulgaris Thoday, shrub, 83, 84
COMBRETACEAE
Combretum caffrum (Eckl.di Zeyh.) Kuntze, tree, 58, 524, 1423g
MYRTACEAE
Eugenia
capensis (Eckl. it Zeyh.) Harv. ex Sond., tree, 290, 764
zeyheri Harv., tree, 1134
ONAGRACEAE
Oenothera
indecora Cambess., forb, 1947*
parodiana Munz subsp. parodiana, forb, 1997*
HALORAGACEAE
Laurembergia repens Berg, subsp. brachypoda (Hiem) Oberm,
forb, 1686
Gunnera perpensa L., forb, 935
ARALIACEAE
Cussonia spicata Thunb. var. spicata, tree, 64
APIACEAE
Centella
affinis (Eckl. & Zeyh.) var. affinis, suffrutex, 241, 275, 1513
asiatica (L.) Urb., creeping forb, 245, 1299, 1576, 1922
glabra ta L. var natalensis/4 damson, suffrutex, 2007
virgata (L. f.) Drude var. virgata, suffrutex, 1327
sp., prostrate forb, 1262
Alepidea capensis (Berg.) R.A. Dyer var. capensis, forb, 607,
1058,1172
Torilis arvensis (Huds.) Link, forb, 787*
Conium sp., forb, 1 759, 1883, 1895
Lichtensteinia kolbeana H. Bol., forb, 1945
Heteromorpha trifoliata (Wendl.) Eckl. & Zeyh. , shrub, 24
Rhyticarpus difformis (L.) Benth. & Hook., shrub, 35, 1235
Ciclospermum leptophyllum (Pers.) Sprague, forb, 1926*
Pimpinella caffra (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Harv. , forb, Femiebrae plot 9. 28
Berula erecta (Hudson) Cov., forb, 346
Polemannia sp? cf. P. montana Schltr. & Wolff, shrub, rare, 458
Stenosemis caffra (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Sond., forb, 274, 1210
Peucedanum
capense (Thunb.) Sond.
var. capense, shrub, 42, 407
var. lanceolatum (E. Mey. ex Meisn.) Sond., shrub, 20, 188,
410
CORNACEAE
Curtisia dentata (Burm. f.) C.A. Sm„ tree, 28
ERICACEAE
Erica
adunca Benth., shrub, 654, 788
caffra L„ shrub or small tree, 683
cerinthoides L. var. cerinthoides, shrublet, 167
chamissonis Klotzsch ex Benth., shrub, 711, 835
copiosa Wendl var. copiosa, shrub, 189, 372, 1019, 1180, 1466,
2162
curviflora L. var. curviflora, shrub, 1459
deliciosa Wendl. f. ex Benth., shrub, 1237, 2136
demissa Klotzsch var. polyantha (Klotzsch ex Benth.) Dulfer,
shrub, 784, 1026
pectinifolia Salisb., shrub, 401, 1324
simulans Dulfer var. simulans, shrub, 5, 1111, 1342, 1544, 1553
unilateralis Klotzsch, shrub, 11, 720, 1540
sp., shrub, 445, 617
MYRSINACEAE
Myrsine africana L., shrub, 271, 484
Rapanea melanophloeos (L.) Mez, tree, 22
PRIMULACEAE
Samolus valerandi L., forb, 887
Anagallis arvensis L., forb, 794, 1071, 1914, 2063*
230
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
PLUMBAGINACEAE
Plumbago auricula ta Lam., scan dent shrub, 532
SAPOTACEAE
Sideroxylon inerme L., tree, 282, 437
EBENACEAE
Euclea
crispa (Thunb.) Guerke var. crispa, tree, 16, 147, 1 70, 422
natalensis A. DC., shrub, 966
polyandra (L. f.) E. Mey. ex Hiem, shrub, 44, 195
schimperi (A. DC.) Dandy var. schimperi, tree, 89, 550, 1129,
1568
undulata Jacq. var. undulata, tree, 592, 6 78
Diospyros
lycioides Desf. subsp. lycioides, shrub or tree, 30, 505, 593,
628, 813
scabrida (Harv. ex Hiem) De Winter var. cordata (E. Mey. ex
DC.) De Winter, shrub, 304, 507, 625, 687
whyteana (Hiem) F. White, tree, 289
OLEACEAE
Chionanthus
foveolatus (E. Mey.) Steam subsp. foveolatus, small tree, 128,
447
peglerae (C.H. Wr.) Steam, small tree, 1194
Olea
capensis L. subsp. capensis, shrub, 1719
capensis L. subsp. macrocarpa (C.H. Wr.) Verdoom, tree, 92,
790
europaea L. subsp. africana (Mill.) P.S. Green, tree, 73, 423
woodiana KnobL, tree, 57
Jasminum
angulare Vahl, climber, 1411, 1758, 1917
cf. multipartitum Hochst., climber, 1419
SALVADORACEAE
Azima tetracantha Lam., scandent shrub, 93
LOGANIACEAE
Strychnos decussata (Pappe) Gilg, tree, 288
Nuxia floribunda Benth., tree, 283
Buddleja saligna Willd., shrub or small tree, 118
GENTIAN ACE AE
Sebaea hymenosepala Gilg, forb, 361, 11 74, 1448
Chironia
melampyrifolia Lam., forb, 712
tetragona L. f, forb, 848
Nymphoides thunbergiana (Griseb.) Kuntze, aquatic forb, 1589,
2030
APOCYNACEAE
Acocanthera oppositifolia (Lam.) Codd, shrub, 78
Carissa
bispinosa (L.) Desf. ex Brenan var. acuminata (E. Mey.) Codd,
shrub, 773
bispinosa (L.) Desf. ex Brenan var. bispinosa, shrub, 1004
haematocarpa (Eckl.) A. DC., shrub, 1423d
Gonioma kamassi E. Mey., tree, 47, 115, 1146
Pachypodium
bispinosum (L. f.) A. DC., succulent, 599, 2147
succulentum (L. f.) A. DC., succulent, 809
ASCLEPIADACEAE
Xysmalobium involucratum Decne., forb, 1704
Schizoglossum
atropurpureum E. Mey. subsp. tridentatum (Schltr.) Kupicha,
forb, 2071
cordifolium E. Mey., forb, 1094, 1685
Periglossum sp., forb, 1663
Pachycarpus dealbatus E. Mey., forb, 741, 868, 959
Asclepias
cancellata Burm. f, forb, 1309
crispa Berg., forb, 1175
expansa (E. Mey.) Schltr., forb, 1171
Cynanchum natalitium Schltr., climber, 648
Sarcostemma viminale (L.) R. Br., succulent climber, 652
Secamone
alpinii Schultes, climber, 139, 311, 1667
filiformis (L. f.) J.H. Ross, climber, 525, 1382
Sisyranthus sp., forb, 1684
Anisotoma pedunculata N.E. Br., forb, 1678
Stapelia sp., succulent, 727, 1534
Tylophora lycioides (E. Mey.) Decne., forb, 1367
Dregea floribunda E. Mey., climber, 530
CONVOLVULACEAE
Cuscuta campestris Yunck., twining parasite, 560, 1401 *
Falkia repens L. f, creeping forb, 1301
Convolvulus
bidentatus Bemh. apud Krauss, creeping forb, 1857
farinosus L., creeping forb, 886
Ipomoea
arachnosperma Welw., climber, new record for Cape Province,
1423a
simplex Thunb., forb, 2117
BORAGINACEAE
Ehretia rigida (Thunb.) Druce, shrub or small tree, 549
Cynoglossum hispidum Thunb., forb, 738, 1160
Lithospermum
cf. inomatum DC., forb, 901, 1116, 1307
scabrum Thunb., forb, 2140
VERBENACEAE
Verbena bonariensis L., forb, 1995*
Lantana rugosa Thunb., shrub, 952, 1688
Plexipus cuneifolius (L. f.) Rafin., shrublet, 2201
Priva meyeri Jaub. & Spach. var. meyeri, forb, 973
LAMIACEAE
Ajuga ophrydis Burch, ex Benth., forb, 1211, 1293
Teucrium
africanum Thunb., forb, 1812
trifidum Retz., forb, 942, 1131
Leonotis
leonurus (L.) R. Br., shrub, 27
ocymifolia (Burm. f.) Iwarsson var. ocymifolia, shrub, 419, 1507
Stachys
aethiopica L., forb, 1 771
graciliflora Presl, forb, 1369
scabrida Skan, forb, 382a
Salvia
aurita L. f. var. aurita, forb, 1226, 1280
repens Burch, ex Benth. var. repens, forb, 906, 1861
triangularis Thunb., forb, 504, 1835
Mentha longifolia (L.) Huds. subsp. capensis (Thunb.) Briq., forb,
318
Plectranthus
madagascariensis (Pers.) Benth.
var. aliciae Codd, forb, 1132
var. madagascariensis, forb, 1525
var. ramosior Benth., forb, 1604
spicatus E. Mey. ex Benth., forb, 1110, 1562, 1645
strigosus Benth., forb, 131
verticillatus (L. f.) Druce, forb, 385, 1234, 1375
SOLANACEAE
Nicandra physalodes Gaertn., forb, 2076*
Lycium
ferocissimum Miers, shrub, 938, 1423 f
oxycarpum Dun., shrub, 1805
Withania somnifera (L.) Dun, shrub, 925
Physalis peruviana L., forb, 1616*
Solanum
giganteum Jacq., shrub, 1599
gracile Dun, forb, 1 751
hermannii Dun, shrub, 76 7
nodiflorum Jacq. , forb, 1767
retroflexum Dun, shrub, 914, 1485, 1929
rigescens Jacq., shrub, 497, 757
tomentosum L., shrub, 920, 1556
Datura ferox L., forb, 1423c*
Nicotiana glauca R.A. Grab., small tree, 722, 1948*
SCROPHULARIACEAE
Verbascum virgatum Stokes, forb, 206 7*
Diascia capsularis Benth., forb, 638, 1444, 1526
Nemesia
cf. cynanchifolia Benth., forb, 1395
fruticans (Thunb.) Benth., forb, 893, 899, 1907
melissifolia Benth., forb, 1910
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
231
Halleria lucida L., shrub or small tree, 75, 21 7
Freylinia undulata (L. f.) Benth., shrub, 392
Sutera
albiflora Verdoom, shrublet, 99, 381
argentea (L. f) Hiem, shrublet, 663
foliolosa (Benth.) Hiern, shrublet, 902
kraussiana (Benth.) Hiem, shrublet, 953
pinnatifida (Benth.) Kuntze, shrublet, 1415
roseoflava Hiern, forb, 355, 391, 634
Phyllopodium krebsianum Benth., forb, 1931, 1971
Dysanthes dubia (L.) Bernh., forb, 1045, 1508
Veronica anagallis-aquatica L., forb, 1 748
Alectra capensis Thunb., parasitic forb, 719
Graderia scabra (L. f.) Benth., forb, 1392, 2119, 2129
Buchnera dura Benth., forb, 1232, 1431, 1490, 1570
Cycnium tubulosum (L. f.) Engl, parasitic forb, 215, 1439
Striga bilabiata (Thunb.) Kuntze, parasitic forb, 1173
Harveya speciosa Bernh. ex Krauss, parasitic forb, 228b, 1333
Hyobanche sanguinea L., parasitic herb, 1855
SELAGINACEAE
Hebenstretia integrifolia L., shrublet, 1906
Selago
corymbosa L., shrub, 166
speciosa Rolfe, forb, 1346
Walafrida
geniculata (L. f.) Rolfe, shrublet, 1 749
saxatilis (E. Mey.) Rolfe, shrublet, 1372
witbergensis (E. Mey.) Rolfe, shrublet, 1966
BIGNONIACEAE
Tecomaria capensis (Thunb.) Spach, shrub, 531, 651, 1381
Rhigozum obovatum Burch., shrub, 1389
GESNERIACEAE
Streptocarpus
meyeri Burn, forb, 1334, 1449
rexii (Hook.) Lindl., forb, 566, 1075, 1888
ACANTHACEAE
Thunbergia
capensis Retz., prostrate shrublet, 822, 1168
dregeana Nees, prostrate shrublet, 941
Chaetacanthus sp. nov., shrublet, 224, 672, 1400
Ruellia cf. pilosa L. f, forb, 698
Crabbea nana Nees subsp. nana, forb, 368
Barleria obtusa Nees, shrublet, 538, 1551
Blepharis
capensis (L. f.) Pers.; shrublet, 818
integrifolia (L. f.) E. Mey. ex Schinz var. integrifolia, shrublet,
1739
cf. procumbens (L. f.) Pers., shrublet, 462
Peristrophe cemua Nees, shrublet, 533
Hypoestes forskaolii (Vahl) R. Br., shrublet, 130, 336, 1603
Siphonoglossa
leptantha (Lindau) ined.
subsp. late-ovata (C.B. Cl.) ined., shrublet, 1850
subsp. leptantha, shrublet, 1882
Isoglossa
bolusii C.B. Cl., shrublet, 1 794
grantii C.B. C7., shrublet, 1606
prolixa (Nees) Lindau, shrublet, 1893
Justicia capensis Thunb., shrub, 1113
PLANTAGINACEAE
Plantago
lanceolata L., forb, 1222*
virginica L., forb, 1 737*
RUB LACE AE
Kohautia amatymbica Eckl. & Zeyh., forb, 1666
Coddia rudis (E. Mey. ex Harv.) Verde., shrub or small tree, 160,
686
Gardenia thunbergia L. f, tree, 123
Hyperacanthus amoenus (Sims) Bridson, tree, 86
Canthium
inerme (L. f.) Kuntze, tree, 106, 310, 436
mundianum Cham. & Schlechtd., tree, 65, 1646
Psydrax obovata (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Bridson subsp. obovata, tree,
71, 299, 303, 685, 869
Pavetta
capensis (Houtt.) Brem. subsp. capensis, tree, 26, 100, 1150
inandensis Brem. , tree, 294, 305
lanceolata Ec kl., tree, 1601
Psychotria capensis (Eckl.) Vatke, tree, 87, 684
Galopina
aspera (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Walp., forb, 1133
circaeoides Thunb., forb, 1152, 1227
Anthospermum
galioides Reichb. f. subsp. galioides, shrublet, 1304
herbaceum L. f, forb, 256, 841
paniculatum Cruse, shrub, 1300, 1321, 2096
spathulatum Spreng.
subsp. spathulatum, shrub, 121
subsp. uitenhagense Puff, shrub, 192
Richardia humistrata (Cham. & Schlechtd.) Steud., forb, 1668,
2008*
Rubia petiolaris DC., forb, 1 725
DIPSACACEAE
Cephalaria humilis (Thunb.) Roem. & Schult., forb, 955, 1182,
2097
Scabiosa columbaria L., forb, 399, 956, 1345
CUCURBITACEAE
Zehneria scabra (L. f.) Sond., climbing forb, 1608
Kedrostis
cf. capensis (Sond.) A. Meeuse, climbing forb, 811
nana (Lam.) Cogn. var. zeyheri (Schrad.) A. Meeuse, climbing
forb, 1376
Coccinea palmata (Sond.) Cogn., climbing forb, 1 779
CAMPANULACEAE
Wahlenbergia
capillacea (L. f.) A. DC., forb, 222, 1495
cf. cuspidata V. Brehm., forb, 2152
cf. dentifera V. Brehm., forb, 1069, 1698
krebsii Cham, subsp. krebsii, forb, 2135
madagascariensis A. DC., forb, 1750, 1860
undulata (L. f.) A. DC., forb, 801, 804, 904, 1621, 1908
lightfootia
albens Spreng. ex A. DC., shrublet, 586
cinerea (L. f.) Sond., shrublet, 1536, 1538, 1558
divaricata Buek.
var. debilis (Sond.) Adamson., forb, Plots 27.41, 28.30
var. divaricata, forb, 985
LOBELIACEAE
Cyphia sylvatica Eckl. & Zeyh. var. sylvatica, twining forb, 203,
380, 1557
Lobelia
ancepsZ,. f, forb, 1070, 1649
erinus L., forb, 2038
flaccida (Presl) A. DC. subsp. flaccida, forb, 1031, 1166
thermalis Thunb., forb, 877, 1862
tomentosa L. f, forb, 356, 1077
Monopsis
scabra (Thunb.) Urb., forb, 50, 1072, 1532
unidentata (Dryand.) E. Wimm. subsp. intermedia ined. , forb,
1532, 1676
Grammatotheca bergiana (Cham.) Presl var. bergiana, forb, 2035
ASTERACEAE
Vernonia
capensis (Houtt.) Druce, forb, 1018, 1059
neocorymbosa Hilliard, shrub, 1463
Corymbium africanum L., forb, 2000
Mikania capensis DC., climber, 1605
Pteronia
cf. paniculata Thunb., shrub, 1023
teretifolia (Thunb.) Fourc., shrub, 165, 1281
Amellus strigosus (Thunb.) Less, subsp. pseudoscabridus Rommel,
forb, 1736
Aster
bakenanus Burtt Davy ex C.A. Sm., shrublet, 1012, 1350, 2120
squamatus (Spreng.) Hieron, forb, 1814*
Felicia
aethiopica (Burm. f.) H. Bol. & Wolley Dodd ex Adamson &
Salter subsp. ecklonis (Less.) Grau, shrub, 1527
fascicularis DC., shrub, 900, 1076
filifolia (Vent.) Burtt Davy, shrub, 643
Microglossa mespilifolia (Less.) B.L. Robinson, scandent shrub,
1147, 1417, 1563, 1674
Nidorella undulata (Thunb.) Sond. ex Harv., forb, 1231, 1588
Conyza
scabrida DC., forb, 779
ulmifolia (Burm. f.) Kuntze, forb, 204, 332, 373, 1219, 1583
232
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
sp., forb, 1 753
Chrysocoma ciliata L., shiub, 226, 278, 726
Brachylaena
elliptica (Thunb.) DC., tree, 39, 286
glabra (L. f.) Druce, tree, 124
ilicifolia (Lam.) Phill. & Schweick., shrub or tree, 563
Tarchonanthus camphoratus L., tree, 23
Blumea cafra (DC.) O. Hoffm., forb, 1852
Denekia capensis Thunb., forb, 1687
Gnaphalium
coarctatum Willd., forb, 776, 1934*
pensylvanicum Willd., forb, 770*
vestitum Thunb., forb, 427
Troglophyton capillaceum (Thunb.) Hilliard & Burtt subsp. capil-
laceum, forb, 1371
Pseudognaphalium undulatum (L.) Hilliard & Burtt, forb, 916,
1 763b
Helipterum milleflorum (L.) Druce, shrub, 46, 702
Helichrysum
albanense Hilliard, forb, 8, 1 78
anomalum Less., shrublet, 1482
appendiculatum (L. f.) Less., forb, 1214, 1702
aureum (Houtt.) Men. var. monocephalum (DC. ) Hilliard, forb,
714
cephaloideum DC., forb, 259, 469, 498
cymosum (L.) D. Don subsp. cymosum, shrublet, 1016, 1295
felinum Less., shrublet, 210, 1015
gymnocomum DC., forb, 1256
herbaceum (Andr.) Sweet, forb, 6, 1477
lineare DC., shrublet, 908, 909
miconiifolium DC., forb, 1038, 1215, 1294
nudifolium (L.) Less., forb, 412, 543b, 1140
odoratissimum (L.) Sweet, shrublet, 276, 602, 840
oxyphyllum DC., forb, 968, 1015
pilosellum (L. f.) Less., forb, 2130
rosum (Berg.) Less.
var. arcuatum Hilliard, shrublet, 805, 1002, 1969
var. rosum, shrublet, 843, 910
rugulosum Less., shrublet, 466
rutilans (L.) D. Don, shrublet, Plots 32.12, 22.3
spiralepis Hilliard & Burtt, forb, 680, 84 7
zeyheri Less., shrublet, 1339
Disparago ericoides Gaertn., shrublet, 272, 371
Elytropappus rhinocerotis (L. f.) Less., shrub, 138, 1798
Metalasia
gnaphalodes (Thunb.) Druce, shrub, 29
muricata (L.) D. Don, shrub, 681, 1473
Relhania
genistifolia (L.) L 'Herit., shrub, 1991
pungens L ’Hdrit.
subsp. angustifolia (DC.) Bremer, shrub, 1024, 1137
subsp. pungens, shrub, 424
Athrixia heterophylla (Thunb.) Less., forb, 402, 2066, 2139
Pulicaria scabra (Thunb.) Druce, forb, 1610
Xanthium spinosum L., forb, 1 785*
Verbesina encelioides (Cav.) Gray var. exauriculata C.B. Robinson
& Greenm., forb, 1423b*
Bidens pilosa L., forb, 1358d, 1550*
Galinsoga ciliata (Raf.) Blake, forb, 1361, 2074b*
Schkuhria pinnata (Lam.) Cabr., forb, 1845*
Tagetes minuta L., forb, 1 732*
Eriocephalus africanus L., shrub, 568
Lasiospermum bipinnatum (Thunb.) Druce, forb, 1807
Oedera imbricata Lam., shrub, 21 74
Athanasia
dentata (L.) L., shrub, 239, 641, 106 7
pinnata L. f, shrub, 483
Inulanthera dregeana (DC.) Kallersjo, shrub, 425, 594, 1468,
1516
Hymenolepsis indivisa (Harv.) Kdllersjo, shrub, 853
Matricaria nigellifolia DC. var. tenuior DC., forb, 1574
Cotula
coronopifolia L., forb, 897
heterocarpa DC., forb, 261, 363, 756, 1074, 1913
Schistostephium crataegifolium (DC.) Fenzl ex Harv., shrub, 45,
479
Artemisia afra Jacq. ex Willd., shrub, 335
Pentzia
incana (Thunb.) Kuntze, shrub, 535, 1387
pilulifera (L. f.) Fourc., forb, 926
Cineraria lobata L’Hirit., shrub, 1406, 1627, 1637, 1654
Senecio
acaulis (L. f.) Sch. Bip., forb, 2106
articulatus (L.) Sch. Bip., forb, 878
brachypodus DC., shrub, 1829, 1900
chrysocoma Meerb., forb, 971
coronatus (Thunb.) Harv., forb, 1033
crassiusculus DC., forb, 1017
crenatus Thunb., forb, 1213, 1472
gramineus Harv., forb, 378
ilicifolius L., forb, 1 766
inaequidens DC., forb, 324, 382b, 781
inomatus DC., shrub, Plot 9
isatideus DC., forb, 1347
juniperinusE./ var.juniperinus, forb, disturbed places, 277, 957
leptophyllus DC., forb, 917
linifolius L., forb, 1569, 1839, 2124
lineatus (L. f.) DC., shrub, Ferniebrae plots C8 & C9
madagascariensis Poir., forb, 1763a, 1951
oliganthus DC., forb, 644, 1467
othonniflorus DC., forb, 954, 1011, 1217, 2109
oxydontus DC., forb, 384, 982, 1112, 1337
oxyriifolius DC., forb, 1103, 1181
pinifolius (L.) Lam., shrub, 653, 2121
cf. pinifolius (L.) Lam., shrub, 584, 1849
polyodon DC. var. subglaber (Kuntze) Hilliard & Burtt, forb,
176, 387, 1442
puberulus DC., forb ,225, 970, 976
pyramidatus DC., shrub, 2144
quinquelobus (Thunb.) DC., shrub, 1597
radicans (L. f.) Sch. Bip., succulent forb, 583
retrorsus DC., forb, 2095
ruwenzoriensis S. Moore, forb, 1769
scaposus DC., forb, 1799
stria tifolius DC., forb, 1832
vitalis N.E. Br., succulent shrub, 114, 622, 699
sp. cf. S. albanensis DC. var. doroniciflorus (DC.) Harv., forb,
Plot 12.6
Euryops
algoensis DC., shrub, 587
euryopoides (DC.) B. Nord., shrub, 2021
latifolius B. Nord, sparse shrub, subendemic, 487, 580
trilobus Harv. , shrub, 724
Othonna quinquedentata Thunb., shrub, 362
Osteospermum
calendulaceum L. f., forb, 1362, 1622
glabrum N.E. Br., forb, 2006
herbaceum L. f., forb, 1409
imbricatum L.
subsp. imbricatum, shrub, 1 74, 601, 829, 1343
subsp. nervatum (DC.) Norl var. nervatum, shrub, 682, 986
junceum Berg., shrub, 836, 1119
Cluysanthemoides monilifera (L.) Norlindh subsp. pisifera (L.)
Norlindh, shrub, 146
Ursinia anethoides (DC.) N.E. Br., shrub, 175, 388, 588, 2107,
2159
Arctotis microcephala (DC.) Beauv., forb, 389, 596, 610, 924
Haplocarpha
lyrata Harv., forb, 220, 279
scaposa Harv., forb, 1062, 2137
Gazania
krebsiana Less.
subsp. arctotoides (Less.) RoessL, forb, 211, 365
subsp. serrulata (DC.) RoessL, forb, 716
Cullumia decurrens Less., forb, 394
Berkeya
decurrens (Thunb.) Willd, forb, 1228
sphaerocephala (DC.) RoessL, forb, 1225
sp., forb, 931
Carduus tenuiflorus Curtis, forb, 759*
Centaurea melitensis L., forb, 800*
Oldenburgia grandis (Thunb.) Baillon, tree, 129
Gerbera
ambigua (Cass.) Sch. Bip., forb, 737, 1543, 1697
piloselloides (L.) Cass., forb, 1092, 1212, 1251, 1496
Tolpis capensis (L.) Sch. Bip., forb, 1297
Hypochoeris
brasiliensis (Less.) Griseb., forb, 1975*
radicata L., forb, 1935*
Sonchus
dregeanus DC., forb, 1270, 1672
gigas L. Boulos ex Humbert, forb, 1253
oleraceus L., forb, 1936*
Bothalia 18,2: 233-260 (1988)
A synopsis of the plant communities of Swartboschkloof, Jonkershoek,
Cape Province
d.j. McDonald* **
Keywords: classification, forest, fynbos, map, Mesic Mountain Fynbos, phytosociology, Swartboschkloof
ABSTRACT
Swartboschkloof forms part of the Jonkershoek catchment complex, Cape Province, South Africa. It was select-
ed for multidisciplinary studies of Mountain Fynbos vegetation in 1978.
In this study the Braun-Blanquet (B-B) phytosociological method was used to study the vegetation. Data were
collected at 201 sites throughout the study area; 101 of these sites were correlated with a survey of soils of part
of the same area. Sixteen fynbos communities are classified in three groups and five forest communities are classified
in two groups.
Syntaxonomic tables and a map of the plant communities are presented and an attempt has been made to ex-
plain the distribution of the communities in terms of environmental factors.
UITTREKSEL
Swartboschkloof vorm deel van die Jonkershoekopvanggebiedstelsel, Kaapprovinsie, Suid-Afrika. Dit is in
1978 gekies vir multidissiplinere studies van Bergfynbosplantegroei.
In hierdie studie is die Braun-Blanquet-fitososiologiese metode (B-B) gebruik vir die bestudering van die plan-
tegroei. Gegewens is by 201 plekke regdeur die studiegebied versamel; 101 van hierdie plekke is gekorreleer met
’n opname van die gronde van deel van dieselfde gebied. Sestien fynbosgemeenskappe word in drie groepe ge-
klassifiseer en vyf woudgemeenskappe word in twee groepe geklassifiseer.
Sintaksonomiese tabelle en ’n kaart van die plantgemeenskappe word gegee en daar word gepoog om die ver-
spreiding van die gemeenskappe in terme van omgewingsfaktore te verduidelik.
CONTENTS
Introduction 234
Study area 234
Location 234
Geology, geomorphology and topography .... 235
Soils 235
Climate 235
Methods 237
Vegetation 237
1 Mesic Mountain Fynbos Communities 240
1.1 Erica hispidula-Diospyros glabra Shrublands . 240
1.1.1 Diospyros glabra-Elegia capensis High Closed
Shrubland (A) 240
1.1.2 Diospyros glabra- Cliff ortia odorata High
Closed Shrubland (B) 241
1.1.3 Diospyros glabra-Rhus angustifolia Short to
Tall Closed Shrublands 242
1 .1 .3.1 Rhus angustifolia-Berzelia lanuginosa Short
Closed Shrubland (D) 245
1 . 1 .3 . 1 . 1 Berzelia lanuginosa-Merxmuellera cincta
Tall Closed Shrubland (C) 245
1.1.3. 2 Rhus angustifolia-Zantedeschia aethiopica
High Closed Shrubland (E) 246
1.1.3. 3 Rhus angustifolia- My rsine africana Short
to High Closed Shrubland 247
1.1. 3.3.1 Myrsine africana-Olea europaea subsp.
africana High Closed Shrubland (F) 247
1 .1 .3.3.2 Myrsine africana- Giff ortia dentata Short
Closed Shrubland (G) 248
* Based on an M.Sc. thesis, University of Cape Town.
** Botanical Research Unit, P.O. Box 471, Stellenbosch 7600.
MS. received: 1987.08.19.
1.1.3 A Rhus angustifolia- Ischyrolepis gaudichau-
diana High Closed Shrubland (I) 248
1 .1 .3.4.1 Ischyrolepis gaudichaudiana-Myrsine afri-
cana High Closed Shrubland (H) 248
1.2 Diospyros glabra-Protea repens Transitional
Shrublands 249
1.2.1 Protea repens-Rhus angustifolia High Closed
Shrubland (L) 249
1.2.1 .1 Rhus angustifolia-Ischyrolepis sieberi Tall
Closed Shrubland (K) 250
1.2. 1.2 Protea repens-Maytenus oleoides High
Closed Shrubland (J) 250
1.2.2 Protea repens-Nebelia paleacea High Closed
Shrubland 251
1 .2.2.1 Nebelia paleacea-Erica sphaeroidea High
Closed Shrubland (M) 251
1.2. 2. 2 Nebelia paleacea- Restio perplexus Low
Closed Shrubland (N) 252
1 .3 Erica hispidula-Ischyrolepis sieberi Shrublands 253
1.3.1 Ischyrolepis sieberi-Nebelia paleacea Short
Closed Shrubland (P) 253
1.3.2 Ischyrolepis sieberi-Tetraria involucrata
Short Closed Shrubland (R) 253
2 Riparian and Forest Communities 254
2.1 Hartogiella schinoides-Diospyros glabra Ripa-
rian and Forest Communities 254
2.1.1 Halleria elliptica-Brabejum stellatifolium
Short Forest (T) 255
2.1.2 Halleria elliptica-Giff ortia cuneata High
Closed Shrubland (S) 255
2.2 Diospyros glabra-Rapanea melanophloeos Tall
Forest (W) 256
2.2.1 Rapanea melanophloeos- Cunonia capensis
High Forest (U) 256
234
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
2.2.2 Rapanea melanophloeos-Heeria argentea
Short Forest (V) 257
Discussion and conclusions 257
Acknowledgements 259
References 259
Appendix 259
INTRODUCTION
This paper is a summary of information and data
gathered for a thesis (McDonald 1983) and previously
partly published in a report of the South African National
Scientific Programmes (McDonald 1985). A checklist of
the plants recorded from Swartboschkloof is published
separately (McDonald & Morley 1988).
Swartboschkloof is situated in the Jonkershoek Forest
Reserve, about 15 km from Stellenbosch in the Cape
Province. It is 373 ha in extent and forms part of the
greater Jonkershoek Catchment in the Hottentots-
Holland Mountains at 34° 00' south latitude and 18° 57'
east longitude. Most of the area has an equatorial (north-
facing) aspect.
Three studies of the vegetation of Swartboschkloof
(Van der Merwe 1966; Werger, Kruger & Taylor 1972;
Van Wilgen 1981) were carried out prior to this survey.
Those of Van der Merwe and Van Wilgen were mainly
concerned with vegetation response to fire and that of
Werger et al. was a phytosociological study. Fry (1987)
surveyed the soils of Swartboschkloof.
The objectives of this study were: a, to identify, de-
scribe and classify the Cape fynbos and forest communi-
ties occurring in Swartboschkloof; b, to map the plant
communities of Swartboschkloof; c, to relate the plant
communities to the soils of Swartboschkloof; d, to re-
late the plant communities to the abiotic environment.
STUDY AREA
Location
The boundaries of the area selected for this survey
(Figure 1) do not coincide exactly with the boundaries
of the Swartboschkloof-Sosyskloof Nature Reserve (pro-
claimed in 1936) but are as follows: in the north-east
FIGURE 1. — Aerial photograph of Swartboschkloof showing the main features and boundaries of the study area.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
235
the boundary is a ridge of sandstone cliffs; from the
south-east corner to the south-west corner the firebreak
forms the southerly boundary; on the west side the
boundary is the watershed between the Swartboschkloof
and Sosyskloof catchments; in the north, Sosyskloof
stream forms the boundary; a short firebreak bounds a
small section at the base of Swartboschkloof on the
north to north-east side.
At present Swartboschkloof is managed as part of the
whole Jonkershoek catchment complex.
Geology, geomorphology and topography
Rust (1967) classified the sandstone sediments of
Jonkershoek in the Graafwater Formation of the Table
Mountain Group (T.M.G.) and described the Stellenbosch
Mountain, out of which Swartboschkloof is eroded, as
‘a succession of mainly white or cream orthosandstone
with interlaminated purple siltstone beds, which show
some worm remains’. The Table Mountain Group lies un-
conformably on porphyritic Cape granite at Jonkershoek
(Taljaard 1949). Van der Merwe (1966) noted that the
granite is encountered up to about 530 m elevation above
which T.M.G. sandstone occurs. Fry (1987), however,
found the highest point of the granite-sandstone contact
to be nearer 700 m elevation.
Swartboschkloof is a fan-shaped valley ranging from
285 m to 1 200 m in altitude. The head of the valley
forms the widest part of the ‘fan’ and it narrows with a
decrease in altitude. The slopes range from less than 5°
to 45° with the steep slopes averaging 30° . About two
per cent of the area consists of inaccessible, almost verti-
cal cliffs (Figure 2).
Apart from the steep cliffs and colluvial slopes there
are also loose boulder screes. These screes consist of sand-
stone boulders and are on the higher slopes immediately
below the steep cliffs. In parts the screes have stabilized
and support forest vegetation.
The streams in Swartboschkloof follow the fault lines.
The main Swartboschkloof stream, which flows from
south-west to north-east, is perennial and well wooded.
It is fed by three other seasonal streams. The other main
stream, on the east side of the valley, is perennial but is
not fed by other streams.
Soils
The soils of Swartboschkloof are complex owing to
colluvial mixing of sandstone and granite. The presence
of granite gives rise to soils of the Hutton, Magwa and
Nomanci Forms. Seeps and other areas of impeded drain-
age are also found, resulting in development of soils of
the Westleigh and Fernwood Forms.
Fry (1987) classified the soils of Swartboschkloof
following the binomial classification for soils in South
Africa (MacVicar et al. 1977). He identified 12 forms
with 14 series.
Climate
Wicht, Meyburgh & Boustead (1969) described the
climate of Jonkershoek as being ‘Etesian of the Mediter-
ranean type’. According to Koppen’s (1931) system it
would have an average temperature of below 22° C for
the warmest month. It conforms to Climate Type IV in
Walter & Leith’s classification (Werger et al. 1972).
Swartboschkloof, having a general equatorial aspect,
experiences high insolation over the greater part but parti-
cularly on the higher slopes in the summer. The few slopes
with a southerly aspect experience less direct sun and are
thus cooler and moister.
Wicht et al. (1969) discussed at length the occurrence
of rain and its measurement, temperature changes and
incoming radiation. The mean annual rainfall over 20
years is about 1 600 mm at the base of the Swartbosch-
kloof Valley (Swartboschkloof weather station), 50%
of which falls from May to August and only 12% from
December to March — the hottest driest period.
FIGURE 2. — Swartboschkloof in
1973. Photograph by B . Bre-
denkamp, used with permis-
sion Jonkershoek Forestry
Research Centre.
236
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
FIGURE 3. — Sketch-map of Swartboschkloof showing positions of releves and soil pits.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
237
METHODS
The Braun-Blanquet (B-B) approach was adopted in
this study. For the naming of the communities a species-
binomial system using two differential species in the syn-
taxon is used. Generally the first species was selected on
the basis of its dominance. No suffixes such as -etosum,
-etum and so on, which indicate syntaxonomic hierarchi-
cal ranking, have been used. Much more extensive sam-
pling of Mountain Fynbos is necessary before broad hier-
archical ranking and hence broad syntaxonomic nomen-
clature can be meaningfully applied to the communities
identified in this study (Barkman et al. 1986; S.A. Syn-
taxonomic Nomenclature Committee; Werger 1974). In
addition to the species-binomial, a structural name fol-
lowing Edwards (1983) is given for each community.
Taking the work of Werger (1972) and Campbell &
Moll (1981) into consideration, a pragmatic approach
was adopted where rectangular quadrats of 5 x 10 m
(50 m2) were used in the fynbos vegetation and 10 x
20 m (200 m2 ) quadrats in the riparian and forest com-
munities of Swartboschkloof. Quadrats of 50 m2 were
used to sample the Halleria elliptica-Brabejum Stella ti-
folium Short Forest as this size was adequate for this
community. In the case of the boulder scree communi-
ties, quadrats of 200 m2 were used; their shape was
dependent on subjective assessment of each stand.
The quadrats were divided, where possible, to give
10 equal-sized subplots, for systematized data record-
ing. The subplots were not nested. The long axis of each
quadrat of the fynbos samples was oriented parallel with
the contour whereas the long axes of the forest samples
had a downslope orientation.
There were two phases of fieldwork in this survey.
During the first phase, 101 of the 114 soil pits sampled
by Fry (1987) in his study of Swartboschkloof soils
were relocated. Vegetation sample plots were placed as
close as possible to the soil pits, to permit correlation
between the soil series identified (Fry 1987) and the
vegetation samples (Figure 3). This was done bearing in
mind the requirement for sampling ‘homogeneous’ stands
of vegetation (Werger 1974). It was, however, not always
possible to meet this requirement. The reason for this
was that the soil pits themselves were often on bounda-
ries in the soil catena, a feature reflected by the vegeta-
tion in some cases.
For the second phase of sampling it was necessary to
first examine and interpret 1:5 000 black and white and
1:20000 colour aerial photographs. This was done since
Fry (1987) did not cover the whole area, as defined for
this study, for his soil survey. A further 100 releves were
sampled during the second phase of fieldwork in the
vegetation units delimited on the aerial photos.
Floristic data were gathered by a, recording all per-
manently recognizable species together with their
cover-abundance (B-B) values; and b, collecting those
species not immediately recognizable. When ephemeral
species such as annuals and geophytes were encountered
they were recorded in parentheses.
Structural data were collected for each releve by re-
cording total cover (% ) for each stratum and the domi-
nant species in each stratum.
The computer program, TABSORT, developed by the
Directorate of Forestry at Jonkershoek and modified by
the Botanical Research Institute (Boucher 1977) was
used for the sorting of releve data in this study.
Tables 1, 2 and 3 are partial tables of the final fynbos
vegetation table. Summaries showing the relationships
between the communities represented in the respective
partial tables and the other plant communities are ap-
pended to each partial table. Map symbols are used for
simplicity to compare the summaries with the partial
tables. Table 4 summarizes the occurrence of the more
widely occurring species in the fynbos. Table 5 is the
final phytosociological table (with summary) of the
forest and riparian communities of Swartboschkloof
(McDonald 1983).
Geophytes and annuals which are not permanently
recognizable are not included in the tables. Species
with single occurrences or low cover-abundance are
excluded from the tables.
Original data for the Werger et al. (1972) survey were
made available to me by Mr H.C. Taylor. By keeping the
same releve order as in the final table of the Werger et al.
(1972) study and using the order of species from the
final tables of this study, it was possible to prepare B-B
tables from the Werger et al. (1 972) data which are direct-
ly comparable with those of this study. These tables are
not included here but the interpolation of the Werger
et al. (1972) releves is given in the plant community
descriptions presented by McDonald (1985).
Values in the phytosociological tables (Tables 1, 2, 3
& 5) follow the B-B cover-abundance scale (Mueller-
Dombois & Ellenberg 1974), with ‘O’ representing the
occurrence of species within 1 m around the outside of
any given releve. The values in the summaries and Table
4 represent the percentage occurrence of a species in the
group of releves representing each community as follows:
5 =80-100% ; 4 = 60-79% ; 3 =40-59% ; 2 =20-39% ;
1 =5-19%; +=1-5%.
The vegetation map (Figure 4) was prepared using an
enlargement (to 1:5 000) of a black and white aerial
photograph (Figure 1) as the base map. The photo was
annotated using stereoscopic viewing of 1 :20000 colour
aerial photographs for detailed information. The positions
of releves were plotted and a base map with tentative
community boundaries was drawn. The community
boundaries were then checked in the field, after which
the final map was prepared. Communities are indicated
by the letters A-W on the map and in the headings in
the text.
VEGETATION
The vegetation of Swartboschkloof has been divided
into two main types: 1, Mesic Mountain Fynbos ( sensu
Moll et al. 1984) and 2, Riparian and Forest Communi-
ties. This division is based on physiographic features as
well as physiognomic, structural and floristic character-
istics. The Mesic Mountain Fynbos (MMF) is the domi-
nant type and is found in drier situations than the forests
and riparian vegetation.
238
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
FIGURE 4. — Vegetation map of Swartboschkloof. Symbols of plant communities axe explained in the headings in the text.
239
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
TABLE 1.- Partial Braun-Blanquet (B-B) table (with summary table) of the flesic mountain Fynbos:
Erica hispidula - Diospyros glabra Shrublands
1.1.1 Differential species of the Diospyros glabra - Elegia capensis Shrubland
1 .1 .2 Differential species of the Diospyros glabra - Cliffortia odorata Shrubland
240
Table 1. continued...
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
Community ref.no.
The MMF fits broadly into Taylor’s (1978) zonation
patterns. On the lower slopes with mixed granite-sand-
stone soils mainly proteoid vegetation occurs. On the
upper, drier slopes with shallow sandy soils, plants in
the families Restionaceae and Cyperaceae dominate.
Following Campbell’s (1985) classification, the proteoid
vegetation fits into the Jonkershoek Mesic Proteoid Fyn-
bos and the restioid-cyperoid vegetation approximates
the Kouga Mesic Restioid Fynbos. In addition localized
perennial seeps occur where typical hygrophilous com-
munities are found. These would be classified as Keurbos
Wet Ericaceous Fynbos in Campbell’s (1985) system.
The forests are restricted to streambanks of perennial
streams and rock screes and are somewhat shorter than
those of the southern Cape, probably because of more
extreme climatic conditions.
The Halleria elliptica-Brabejum stellatifolium Short
Forest grades into the high forest vegetation; it is most
often found along drainage lines which have seasonal
running water where high forest vegetation does not
develop. The plant communities described are based on
floristic data presented in Tables 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
The Mesic Mountain Fynbos communities are describ-
ed first, followed by descriptions of the forest and ripa-
rian communities. The order in which the communities
are described follows the order in which they are pre-
sented in Tables 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Three MMF groups, one forest and one riparian group
occur in Swartboschkloof. They are systematically sub-
divided on the basis of floristic relationships (Tables 1,
2, 3, 4 and 5). Map symbols are given in parentheses
with each community name to permit identification of
communities on the vegetation map (Figure 4).
1 Mesic Mountain Fynbos Communities
Three major Mesic Mountain Fynbos Communities
occur in Swartboschkloof: Erica hispidula-Diospyros
glabra Shrublands; Diospyros glabra-Protea repens
Transitional Shrublands and Erica hispidula-Ischyro-
lepis sieberi Shrublands.
1 . 1 Erica hispidula-Diospyros glabra Shrublands
The shrublands grouped together here (Table 1) in-
clude specialized communities and those communities
which favour heavier soils of granite or colluvial origin.
The effect of perennial free water appears to override
the influence of substrate on the development of the
Diospyros glabra-Elegia capensis Shrubland and the
Diospyros glabra- Cliff or tia odorata Shrubland. In this
sense, they are regarded as specialized communities to-
gether with the Rhus angustifolia-Berzelia lanuginosa
and Berzelia lanuginosa-Merxmuellera cincta Shrublands.
The latter two communities, however, are apparently
more substrate-dependent: they are found in a bottom-
land situation on deep, predominantly sandstone-derived
soils. These communities are all referred to as ‘hygro-
philous communities’.
The other shrublands differ from those outlined
above in their preference for drier situations on soils
where granite is the major parent material.
1.1.1 Diospyros glabra-Elegia capensis High Closed
Shrubland (A)
Campbell et al. (1981) structural equivalent: Tall Mid-dense
Shrubland
Bothalia 18,2 (1988) 241
TABLE 2.- Partial Braun-Blanquet ( B-B ) table (with summary) of the Mesic Mountain Fynbos: the Diospyros glabra - Protea repens Transitional Shrublands
Community ref. no. . 1.
(read vertically) . 1.
3.
. A
1 .
1 .
1
1 .
1
1 .
2. . Surrmary table
2.
2
Map symbol
. ABCDEF *GH . I JKLMNPR . ST*UVliJ .
Relev/e number
(read vertically)
. 1. 11111111
.666777777808899999 . 4444458888003555561 1.11111 2222233 .
.01 81 237891 23825785.1 5678245670383567534.1 578901 23736.
111. 11111111111. 1111111111111111.
44445566333 . 255502222334557 . 22223445777777889 .
03490557567 . 01 344235601 9295 . 64899274036789091 .
Species common to Communities 1.1. 3. 4 , 1.1. 3. 4.1 , 1.2.1 , 1.2. 1.1
212+11 +11+2021122
Ischyrolepis gaudichaudiana.2+1 1 21 ++1 +1 1 1 1
Oxalis versicolor .RR +++ ++R R RR
Pelargonium myrrhifolium
Otholobium spicatum . +1 + 01+11
Euphorbia genistoides
Helichrysum zeyheri
Phylica spicata
Pentaschistis aspera
Tetraria flexuosa
Agathosma juniperifolia
Metalasia cephalotes
Mohria caffrorum
Rhynchosia totta
Helichrysum teretifolium
Muraltia heisteria
Helichrysum auriculatum
Osteospermum tomentosum
Otholobium rotundifolium
Agathosma capensis
Crassula pruinosa
5 5.55+
4.41
3.2122
3.3+
3.2+
1 .12+21
2.2
.+11
. 12
Species common to Communities 1.1. 3.1, 1.1. 3.1
1, 1.1. 3. 2, 1.1. 3. 3.1, 1.1. 3. 3. 2, 1.3.4, 1.3. 4.1, 1.2.1, 2.1.1, 1.2. 1.2 4 1.2.2
Rhus angustifolia
Pteridium aquilinum
Anthospermum aethiopicum
Erica sphaeroidea
Maytenus oleoides
Rhus rosmarinifolia
Protasparagus rubicundus
Ficinia filiformis
Halleria elliptica
Chironia baccifera
Phylica pubescens
Agapanthus africanus
Helichrysum cymosum
Helichrysum odoratissimum
Aristida junciformis
Senecio umbel latus
Myrsiphyllum asparagoides
Chasmanthe aethiopica
Helichrysum crispum
0+++1+ 11 1 1+ +
+ 13534432 2132
0 111+11 ++1 +11 +
++ 111 +1+1 + ++
++0+ 00+ + +22
1 2++01 0++++1 +
+0+ + +1
+ 1 +0
2+141 3
+011 1 1 11101 +
+1 +
13 2
.1 R +++ R+
1 1+1
54245545.43331 .55 2
2245553.42311 .543 3
3445555.422+2 1+.5
413555.42313 + .4
25 35.4312 +♦+. 433145
12 23.43+21 ++ .3
135 4.21231 + .43
2 22.32221 + .2
3 15 3.2+ + .443
12 3.1 + + .3
2 521.212+1
551. +2 21 h
2 2 2+.111
1 3+. + + +
4 .++1
2 2 .1
15 .+ +
1 .+
+ .3 3
Species common to Communities 1 .1.3.1, 1.1. 3. 2, 1.1. 3. 3.1, 1.1. 3. 3. 2, 1.1. 3. 4, 1
1.3. 4.1, 1.2.1, 1.2. 1.1, 1.2. 1.2, 1.2. 2.1 4 1
Protea nitida
Protea repens
Brunia nodiflora
Montinia caryophyllacea
Themeda triandra
Peucedanum gummiferum
1 11 11 11.2 210 +221
11022+ 101 1 .042 +5 25 152
0 + 321. 220101 2
1 +12 1+111 ++ .0+ +1 ++ +++1+ +01 h
11 00 121.0 1 +
01444133323. 421 00
2 1110 0 . 21 1
+ ++ + 21. + ++
+ 1 01 . ++
244+
12+0
32 4535.222422 1.3
11 2.33 522+ .
11 +.22 32311.
512 5.443322 +.3
25 3.212211 .
115 2.1++ +++ .2
Differential species: Blechnum punctulatum, Crassula coccinea,
Crassula pellucida, Cullumia setosa, Elegia capensis, Hippia
pilosa, Lampranthus deltoides, Nemesia acuminata
Dominant species: Arctotis semipapposa, Blechnum punctula-
tum, Cullumia setosa, Elegia capensis, Psoralea pinnata
This Community is found on localized wet sites on
slopes at high altitudes (800—930 m) with a south-easterly
aspect, in the south-west quarter of the study area. The
soil is usually waterlogged. The Community is restricted
to this part of the area although many species which
occur in it are found in seep conditions at lower altitudes
associated with other species which do not occur here.
The estimated total cover of this Community is 98%.
Three strata can be distinguished. The tallest stratum
consists of shrubs and restios, 2—3 m high, with an
average projected canopy cover of 56% . Elegia capensis
and Psoralea pinnata are the dominant shrubs in this
stratum. Giffortia dentata, C. polygonifolia and Cullumia
setosa dominate in the second stratum which is 0,5— 2,0
m high and has an average projected canopy cover of 46% .
The third stratum (<0,5 m) consists of herbs and dwarf
shrubs and is dominated by Arctotis semipapposa and
Blechnum punctulatum. Projected canopy cover of the
low stratum is estimated at 10% on average.
1.1.2 Diospyros glabra-Giffortia odorata High Closed
Shrubland (B)
Campbell et al. (1981) structural equivalent: Low Closed Shrub-
land
Differential species: Centella eriantha, Giffortia odorata. Leu-
cadendron salicifolium
Dominant species: Giffortia odorata, Leucadendron salicifolium
242
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
TABLE 3. Partial Braun-Blanquet (B-B) table (with summary) of the Mesic Mountain Fynbos:
Erica hispidula - Ischyrolepis sieberi Shrublands
Cliffortia exilifolia
The Diospyros glabra- Cliffortia odorata Community
is characterized on the basis of one releve (193), sampled
at the top of a stabilized scree slope below cliffs at an
altitude of 655 m. It occurs as a localized stand too small
to sample more extensively but for the sake of complete-
ness it is described. The distinction between it and the
other hygrophilous communities is shown in Table 1.
The Diospyros glabra- Cliffortia odorata Shrubland has
some species which are common to it and to the other
hygrophilous communities: Gnidia oppositifolia, Os-
mi topsis asteriscoides and Psoralea pinnata.
A dense growth of prostrate Cliffortia odorata domi-
nates the lower stratum (< 1 m). Emergent through this
layer are tall to high shrubs such as Leucadertdron sali-
ci folium, Osmitopsis asteriscoides and Psoralea pinnata,
with a projected canopy cover of 24% .
1.1.3 Diospyros glabra -Rhus angustifolia Short to Tall
Closed Shrublands
The common environmental factor shared by the sub-
categories in the Diospyros glabra-Rhus angustifolia
Shrublands is apparently the presence of granite or gra-
nite-derived material in the soil. Fry (1987) found granite
in 82% of the soil profiles related to these shrublands. It
is possible that the influence of granite is masked by an
overburden of sandstone-derived soil in the remaining
18% of the profiles.
The highest point of the granite-sandstone contact is
at about 700 m. Ten per cent of the releves representing
these shrublands are at higher altitudes (680-700 m)
near the granite-sandstone contact. The other 90% are
mostly situated at lower altitudes (330-550 m) where
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
243
TABLE A.- Summary table of species with wide occurrence in the Mesic Mountain Fynbos of Swartboschkloof
244
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
TABLE 5.- Braun-Blanquet (B-B) table of the forest communities of Suartboschkloof ,
with a summary table
Community ref. no. .2. . 2. . . 2. . 2. . 2. . Summary table
(read vertically) .1. . 1 . . . 2. . 2. . 2
.2 . 1 . . 1 . 2 .
flap symbol
s t * u v w .abcdef»hijkl™pr.st*uvw.
Releve number . 1.1111.11.1111222.1111.1111111.
(read vertically) . 3996.0001.16.6699000.1199.1966698.
. 3565346 . 7890 . 47 . 344901 2 . 5667 . 3301 283 .
2.1.2 Differential species of the Halleria elliptica - Cliffortia cuneata Shrubland
2.2.1 Differential species of the Rapanea melanophloeos - Cunonia capensis Forest
Species common to Communities 2.1.1, 2.1.2 S 2.2.2
Brabejum stellatifolium
Oxalis lanata
Rubus rigidus
Blechnum australe
.211 4.5555. . 3333.
. ++++.
. +111 . 4 .R2. 2212111. +
2 + .35 3 .
43353343322322.3 1 .
15 .21.
215 .33552 .
2.2.2 Differential species of the Rapanea melanophloeos - Heeria argentea Forest
Heeria argentea . ... .331+. . . 5 .
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
245
TftBLE 5. continued...
Community ref. no. .2. . 2. . . 2. . 2. . 2. . Summary table
(read vertically) .1. . 1. . . 2. . 2. . 2.
.2 . 1 . . 1 . 2 .
Map symbol S T * U U UJ .ABCDEF*HI JKLmNPR.ST*UUlil.
Releve number . 1.1111.11.1111222.1111.1111111.
(read vertically) . 3996.0001.16.6699000.1199.1966698.
. 3565346.7890 . 47 . 344901 2 . 5667 . 3301 283 .
Species common to Communities 2.2, 2.2.1 4 2.2.2
Rapanea melanophloeos
Olinia ventosa
1323211
1+1 +++
1 +.3 2+2+1
+ 4. 222531
1 3535.
545.
the proportion of granite-derived material in the soil is
greater.
1. 1.3.1 Rhus angustifolia-Berzelia lanuginosa Short
Closed Shrubland (D)
Campbell et al. (1981) structural equivalent: Low Closed Gra-
minoid Shrubland
Differential species: the differential species of this Community
are shared with the Benelia lanuginosa-Merxmuellera cincta
variant: Berzelia lanuginosa, Elegia asperiflora, Neesenbeckia
punctoria. It is distinguished from the variant by the lack of
differential species unique to the variant
Dominant species: Berzelia lanuginosa, Elegia asperiflora, Te-
traria fasciata
The Rhus angustifolia-Berzelia lanuginosa Shrubland
(Figure 5) is found in the lower central part of the study
area (altitude: 380—530 m) which has a north-easterly
aspect.
The soils on which this Community occurs are moist
but well drained. Fry (1987) classified these soils into
three forms and three series: Westleigh Form, Witsand
Series (We 21); Femwood Form, Warrington Series
(Fw 31) and Vilafontes Form, Hudley Series (Vf 11).
The parent material is sandstone. The Witsand and War-
rington Series are described as ‘hydromorphic’ soils and
the Hudley Series as a ‘pale’ soil which is moderately to
poorly drained.
A low stratum 0,5 m high with an average cover of
87% dominated by sedges, notably Tetraria fasciata is
found. Restios, grasses and other herbaceous species
contribute to this layer as well. Berzelia lanuginosa
emerges from the low stratum, occurring sparsely with
an average cover of 10% and not reaching more than 1
m in height.
Osmitopsis asteriscoides , a ubiquitous seep species, is
absent from this Community owing to drier soil condi-
tions. The presence or absence of this species may there-
fore be used in distinguishing this Community from the
Berzelia lanuginosa-Merxmuellera cincta Shrubland.
1.1. 3. 1.1 Berzelia lanuginosa-Merxmuellera cincta Tall
Closed Shrubland (C)
Campbell et al. (1981) structural equivalent: Mid-high Mid-dense
Shrubland
Differential species: Cunonia capensis, Laurentia arabidea, Merx-
muellera cincta, Platycaulos depauperatus
Dominant species: Berzelia lanuginosa, Merxmuellera cincta, Os-
mitopsis asteriscoides
The Berzelia lanuginosa-Merxmuellera cincta Tall
Closed Shrubland (Figure 6) is a variant of the Rhus an-
gustifolia-Berzelia lanuginosa Shrubland. It occurs in
conditions similar to those of the latter Community and
246
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
the two Communities are found closely associated in the
lower central area of Swartboschkloof. It also occurs as a
more distinct unit along a drainage line on the slopes
above Sosyskloof stream.
The soils of the Fernwood Form, Warrington Series,
in the lower central area where the Berzelia lanuginosa-
Merxmuellera cincta Shrubland is found, have a greater
amount of accumulated organic material on the soil
surface on average (91%) than where the Rhus angusti-
folia- Berzelia lanuginosa Shrubland occurs. The diag-
nostic horizon of the soils of the Warrington Series con-
sists of acid, medium-grade, wet regie sand.
Structurally the Berzelia lanuginosa- Merxmuellera
cincta Shrubland differs from the typical community in
that the upper stratum is dominant. This stratum is 1-2
m high, has an average projected canopy cover of 60%
and is dominated by B. lanuginosa, M. cincta, Neesen-
beckia punctoria and Osmitopsis asteriscoides. M. cincta
and N. punctoria grow as large tussocks between which
B. lanuginosa and O. asteriscoides emerge. The lower
FIGURE 5. — Rhus angustifolia-
Berzelia lanuginosa Short '
Gosed Shrubland (D) in the
foreground.
stratum (<1 m) has an average projected canopy cover
of 45% and is dominated by Elegia asperi folia, Erica
hispidula and Platycaulos depauperatus .
Evidence suggests that the development of the Berze-
lia lanuginosa-Merxmuellera cincta Shrubland depends
largely on the presence of a high water-table.
Analysis of the Werger et al. (1972) data shows that
the community they described as the Berzelia lanuginosa
-Osmitopsis asteriscoides Community is the same as the
Berzelia lanuginosa-Merxmuellera cincta Shrubland de-
scribed here.
1 . 1 .3.2 Rhus angustifolia-Zantedeschia aethiopica High
Closed Shrubland (E)
Campbell et al. (1981) structural equivalent: Tall Gosed Proteoid
Shrubland
Differential species: the differential species of this Community
are shared with the Myrsine africana-Olea europaea subsp. afri-
cana Shrubland. They are: Blechnum australe, Maytenus acumi-
nata, Olea europaea susbp. africana and Zantedeschia aethiopica
FIGURE 6. — Berzelia lanuginosa
-Merxmuellera cincta Tall
Closed Shrubland. Note the
erect Osmitopsis asteriscoi-
des emergent through the
graminoid layer.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
247
Dominant species: Pteridium aquilinum. Protea neriifolia, Rhus
angustifolia
The Rhus angustifolia-Zantedeschia aethiopica High
Closed Shrubland (Figure 7) occurs in the mid-central
part of the study area below the contour path at altitudes
ranging from 450—530 m.
Three releves were situated in stands on soils of the
Champagne Form (Ch 1 1) and the other two in vegeta-
tion on soils of the Nomanci Form (No 10) and Magwa
Form (Ma 10) respectively (Fry 1987).
The tall form of the Rhus angustifolia-Zantedeschia
aethiopica Shrubland is found on Champagne Form soils.
The short stratum (<1 m) has the highest projected
canopy cover (93%) and is dominated by Pteridium
aquilinum and Z. aethiopica. R. angustifolia is emergent
from this stratum forming a shrub layer (1-2 m) with a
projected canopy cover of 22%. This form of the Com-
munity is clearly distinguishable on aerial photographs
and in the field, appearing as a physiognomic entity
separate from the other form.
The second form has a high stratum (2—4 m) with a
projected canopy cover of 70% . Protea neriifolia is the
dominant shrub in this stratum. It can also have a tall
stratum (1-2 m) which, if present, is usually dominated
by Brunia nodiflora and Cliff ortia cuneata. The lowest
stratum is a short (<1 m) closed layer (56% projected
canopy cover) with Pteridium aquilinum dominant. This
form of the Community occurs on soils of the Nomanci
and Magwa Forms (Fry 1987).
It may be argued that the ‘tali’ form of the community
is a separate community from the ‘high’ form, on the
basis of physiognomic appearance and structure. How-
ever, on the basis of floristic composition, a distinction
could not be drawn between them. These two structural
forms are therefore mapped as a single unit on the map
of plant communities.
1 .1 .3.3 Rhus angustifolia-Myrsine africana Short to
High Closed Shrubland
This shrubland consists of two variants, the Myrsine
africana-Olea europaea subsp. africana High Closed
Shrubland and the Myrsine africana-Cliffortia dentata
Tall Closed Shrubland. All the soils on which these Com-
munities occur, except Clovelly Form, Geelhout Series
(Cv 11), have granite material in the profile. The influ-
ence of granite is apparently greater on the former than
on the latter Community. In the soils of the Myrsine
africana-Qiffortia dentata Shrubland (except in the
Glenrosa Form), sandstone-derived materials are also
well represented.
The average altitudes at which these two Communi-
ties occur differ by over 160 m. The gradient of slopes
where the Myrsine africana-Cliffortia dentata Shrub-
land occurs average 38° which is almost twice as steep
as those on which the Myrsine africana-Olea europaea
subsp. africana Shrubland is found. The steeper slopes
are also cooler and moister. They have a north-easterly
to south-easterly aspect in contrast to the north-easterly
to north-westerly aspect of the area where the Myrsine
africana-Olea europaea subsp .africana Shrubland occurs.
Floristically, the two variants are related by having a
number of general (ubiquitous) species in common. More
specifically, these shrublands have three species, Protas-
paragus compactus, Psoralea monophylla and Tetraria
sylvatica which are exclusive to them.
1 . 1 .3.3. 1 Myrsine africana-Olea europaea subsp. africana
High Closed Shrubland (F)
Campbell et al. structural equivalent: Tall Closed Proteoid Shrub-
land
Differential species: the differential species of this Community
are shared with the Rhus angustifolia-Zantedeschia aethiopica,
Myrsine africana- Cliff ortia dentata and Ischyrolepis gaudichau-
diana-Myrsine africana Shrubland Communities. They are as
follows: Protasparagus compactus, Blechnum australe, Halleria
lucida, Hartogiella schinoides, Maytenus acuminata, Myrsine
africana, Olea europaea subsp. africana, Rapanea melanophloeos,
Rhus tomentosa, Tetraria sylvatica, Zantedeschia aethiopica
FIGURE 7. — Rhus angustifolia-
Zantedeschia aethiopica
High Closed Shrubland.
Note ‘tall’ form in the fore-
ground and the ‘high’ form
behind.
248
Dominant species: Cliffortia cuneata, Diospyros glabra, Olea
europaea subsp. africana, Protea neriifolia, Pteridium aquilinum,
Rhus angustifolia
The Myrsine africana-Olea europaea subsp. africana
High Closed Shrubland is found in the mid-central part
of the study area. It does not occur as a single unit but
rather as disjunct patches interspersed between other
communities.
The soils on which this Community is found are all
granite-derived and include the same three forms and
series as for the Rhus angustifolia- Zantedeschia aethi-
opica Shrubland: Champagne Form (Ch 11), Nomanci
Form (No 10) and Magwa Form (Ma 10).
The Myrsine africana-Olea europaea subsp. africana
Shrubland is characterized by a high stratum (2—6 m)
with an average projected canopy cover of 67%. This
stratum is dominated by O. europaea subsp. africana,
Protea neriifolia and Rhus angustifolia. A tall stratum
(1—2 m) with an average projected canopy cover of
25% is found in some stands. It is dominated by Clif-
fortia cuneata. A short stratum (<1 m) with an average
projected canopy cover of 24% and dominated by Pteri-
dium aquilinum is the typical understorey of this Com-
munity.
1.1. 3. 3. 2 Myrsine africana- Giffortia dentata Short
Closed Shrubland (G)
Campbell et al. (1981) structural equivalent: Low Closed Shrub-
land
Differential species: Giffortia dentata, Ficinia trichodes, Galium
mucroniferum, Pelargonium cf. tabiilare, Pentaschistis aristidoi-
des, Polyarrhena reflexa, Selago serrata
Dominant species: Aristea major, Giffortia cuneata, Pteridium
aquilinum
The Myrsine africana-Cliffortia dentata Short Closed
Shrubland is found on cool north-east to south-east-facing
slopes, in the south-west sector of Swartboschkloof. It
ranges in altitude from 680—700 m. The slopes are steep,
varying from 32°— 42°. This is much steeper than the
average gradient of the slopes in the catchment.
Four different soil series are found in the four releves
representing this Community: Hutton Form, Clansthal
Series (Hu 24); Glenrosa Form, Glenrosa Series (Gs 15);
Clovelly Form, Mossdale Series (Cv 14) and Clove lly
Form, Geelhout Series (Cv 1 1).
The dominant stratum of the Myrsine africana-
Cliffortia dentata Shrubland is a short layer (< 1 m) with
an average projected canopy cover of 72%. This stratum
is dominated by Aristea major, C. dentata. Erica sphae-
roidea and Pteridium aquilinum. In moist situations, C.
dentata forms extensive low mats. Above the short stra-
tum is a tall shrub layer with an average projected canopy
cover of 35%. It is dominated by A. major, Cannomois
virgata and Giffortia cuneata. C. dentata, Ficinia tricho-
des and Selago serrata are common to the Diospyros
glabra-Elegia capensis Shrubland and the Myrsine afri-
cana-Giffortia dentata Shrubland. This suggests some
affinity between these two Communities, possibly due
to the moist conditions in which they are found.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
1 . 1 .3.4 Rhus angustifolia-Ischyrolepis gaudichaudiana
High Closed Shrubland (I)
Campbell et al. (1981) structural equivalent: Tall Closed Pro-
teoid Shrubland
Differential species: this Community has no true differential
species. It is characterized on the basis of low occurrence or
absence of Hartogiella schinoides, Myrsine africana, Oxalis bi-
fida and Rhus tomentosa
Dominant species: Aristea major, Merxmuellera stricta, Protea
neriifolia, Pteridium aquilinum, Ischyrolepis gaudichaudiana
The Rhus angustifolia-Ischyrolepis gaudichaudiana
High Closed Shrubland in its typical form occurs inter-
spersed with the Rhus angustifolia-Myrsine africana
Shrubland over a large part of the mid-central zone of
the study area. It is found on a wide variety of soils:
Champagne Form (Ch 11), Magwa Form (Ma 10), Clovel-
ly Form (Cv 11, 14) and Glenrosa Form (Gs 15). At
elevations between 550 and 700 m, on the central mid-
slopes, it occurs on soils of Nomanci and Glenrosa Forms.
Protea neriifolia and P. repens dominate the high shrub
layer (2—5 m) which has an average projected canopy
cover of 34%. Following Edwards (1983), this is a mode-
rately closed canopy. Seven of the 18 releves sampled
lacked this stratum.
A tall stratum (1—2 m) occurs in all but one releve.
It has an average projected canopy cover of 25% and is
dominated by Brunia nodi flora, Cannomois virgata, Gif-
fortia cuneata, C. ruscifolia, Diospyros glabra, Halleria
elliptica and Leucadendron salignum. The short stratum
(<1 m) has the highest average projected cover (64%).
Dominant species in this stratum are: Aristea major,
Cymbopogon marginatus, Merxmuellera stricta, Pteri-
dium aquilinum, Ischyrolepis gaudichaudiana and Wat-
sonia pyramidata.
1 . 1 . 3 .4 . 1 Ischyrolepis gaudichaudiana-Myrsine africana
High Closed Shrubland (H)
Campbell et al. (1981) structural equivalent: Tall Closed Pro-
teoid Shrubland
Differential species: this Community has no true differential
species. It is distinguished from the Rhus angustifolia-Ischyro-
lepis gaudichaudiana Shrubland by the marked presence of
Hartogiella schinoides, Myrsine africana, Oxalis bifida and
Rhus tomentosa
Dominant species: Giffortia ruscifolia, Cymbopogon margina-
tus, Merxmuellera stricta. Protea neriifolia, P. nitida, Pteridium
aquilinum, Ischyrolepis gaudichaudiana
The Ischyrolepis gaudichaudiana-Myrsine africana
High Closed Shrubland (Figure 8) is found at altitudes
from 330-500 m in the lower to mid-central parts of
the study area, associated with the Rhus angustifolia-
Myrsine africana Shrubland. The soils on which it is
found are: Magwa Form (Ma 10), Clovelly Form (Cv
1 1), Oakleaf Form (Oa 34) and Glenrosa Form (Gs 15).
Three strata are distinguished in this Community. The
high stratum (2-5 m) is dominated by Protea nitida, P.
neriifolia and less commonly by Cliffortia ruscifolia and
P. repens. The average projected canopy cover for this
stratum is 44%. The tall (1-2 m) stratum which is do-
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
249
FIGURE 8. — Ischyrolepis gaudi-
chaudiana-Myrsine africa-
na High Closed Shiubland.
Note the Protea nitida
shrubs, one of the domi-
nant shrubs in the tall to
high stratum of this com-
munity.
minated by C. cuneata, Diospyros glabra , Rhus angusti-
folia, Halleria elliptica and C. rusci folia, has an average
projected canopy cover of 22%. The short stratum (<1
m) has the highest average projected canopy cover (66% ).
It is dominated by Aristea major, Cymbopogon margi-
natus, Merxmuellera stricta, Montinia caryophyllacea,
Pteridium aquilinum and Ischyrolepis gaudichaudiana .
1.2 Diospyros glabra-Protea repens Transitional
Shrublands
The Diospyros glabra-Protea repens Shrublands
(Table 2) consist of those communities that are transi-
tional between the Erica hispidula- Diospyros glabra
Shrublands and the Erica hispidula- Ischyrolepis sieberi
Shrublands. There are two groups, the Protea repens-
Rhus angustifolia High Closed Shrubland and the Protea
repens-Nebelia paleacea High Closed Shrubland. The
first group has a typical community with two variants
and the second has two variants.
All these Communities, except for two releves on soils
derived mainly from granite, occur on sandstone-derived
soils. The Protea repens-Rhus angustifolia Shrublands
are more akin to the ‘pure’ communities found on soils
of granite and mixed (granite-sandstone) derivation. In
contrast, the Protea repens-Nebelia paleacea Shrublands
are allied to the sandstone-associated communities of the
Erica hispidula- Ischyrolepis sieberi Shrublands.
Table 2 indicates a fall-off in the occurrence of those
species with a granite or mixed soil affiliation as one pro-
ceeds from left to right through the transitional com-
munities. A sharp increase in the occurrence of sandstone-
favouring species is found in the Protea repens-Nebelia
paleacea Shrubland Communities compared with the
Protea repens-Rhus angustifolia Shrubland Communi-
ties.
Protea repens has been used in the binomial of the
major group because there is no other species consider-
ed suitable for this purpose (Table 2). It may be argued
that it is not a suitable species because it has a wide
ecological tolerance and is adversely affected by fire.
However, Protea repens is a conspicuous, easily identi-
fied shrub, which performs best in the transitional com-
munities. These attributes outweigh those not in its
favour.
l. 2.1 Protea repens-Rhus angustifolia High Closed
Shrubland (L)
Campbell et al. (1981) structural equivalent: Tall Closed Proteoid
Shrubland
Differential species: the species which differentiate this Com-
munity are shared with a number of other communities. It is
characterized by absence of many species of communities asso-
ciated with granite-derived and mixed soils and increased presence
of sandstone-favouring species
Dominant species: Bobartia indica, Cliffortia ruscifolia, Protea
neriifolia, P. repens, Restio triticeus
The Protea repens-Rhus angustifolia High Closed
Shrubland in its typical form has a disjunct distribution
in Swartboschkloof, at altitudes ranging from 430—570
m. It is found on the ridge in the north-eastern corner
but mainly on the slopes in the east-central part of the
study area.
The Clovelly Form (Cv 11) soils on which the Protea
repens-Rhus angustifolia Shrubland is found are general-
ly sandy, with boulders and gravel. However, releve 50 is
on sandstone-derived soil of the Constantia Form (Ct 11)
and releve 40 is on Nomanci Form (No 10) soil, which is
a humic clay -loam derived from granite.
Four strata are distinguished in this Community. The
dominant is the high stratum (2-4 m) which has an aver-
age projected cover of 65%. It is dominated by Protea
neriifolia and P. repens. Below the high stratum is a tall
stratum (1—2 m) which is dominated by Qiffortia rusci-
folia and in some cases by Brunia nodiflora. This stratum
has an average projected canopy cover of 28% . The third
layer is a short shrub stratum (0,5—1 m) which has an
average projected canopy cover of 63%. It is dominated
by Restio triticeus. A low stratum (<0,5 m) dominated
by grasses such as Cymbopogon marginatus and Merx-
muellera stricta is found below the short stratum.
250
BothaUa 18,2 (1988)
1 .2. 1 . 1 Rhus angustifolia-Ischyrolepis sieberi Tall
Closed Shrubland (K)
Campbell et al. (1981) structural equivalent: Mid-high Mid-dense
Proteoid Shrubland
Differential species: this Community is characterized on the basis
of a combination of presence, absence and relative abundance of
species. It has no true differential species since it has many
species in common with other communities
Dominant species: Erica hispidula, Merxmuellera stricta, Ischy-
rolepis sieberi, Stoebe plumosa
The Rhus angustifolia-Ischyrolepis sieberi Tall Closed
Shrubland (Figure 9) is found on the west side of the
study area, below the cliffs.
All the soils on which the Rhus angustifolia-Ischyro-
lepis sieberi Shrubland is found are derived from sand-
stone. They include Vilafontes (Vf 11), Clovelly (Cv 1 1)
and Constantia (Ct 11) Forms.
Three strata are found in this Shrubland. The low
stratum (<0,5 m) which is dominated by Merxmuellera
stricta, Ischyrolepis sieberi and Stoebe plumosa has
marginally less projected canopy cover (48%) than the
short stratum. The short stratum (0,5—1 m) is domi-
nated by Erica hispidula and has a projected canopy
cover of 50%. The tall stratum (1—2 m) consists of tall
shrubs which are emergent from the short stratum. The
tall stratum has a projected canopy cover of 35% and is
dominated by Giffortia cuneata and E. hispidula. E.
hispidula in the short and tall strata give this Shrubland
its characteristic ‘ericoid' appearance.
The presence of Ischyrolepis sieberi in the Rhus an-
gustifolia- Ischyrolepis sieberi Shrubland with moderate
to high cover-abundance is significant. It separates this
Community from the Protea repens- Ischyrolepis gau-
dichaudiana Shrubland because, although I. sieberi and
I. gaudichaudiana are morphologically very similar, they
are apparently ecologically mutually exclusive. I. sieberi
favours sandy soils whereas I. gaudichaudiana favours
deeper soils of granite or colluvial derivation.
Ischyrolepis sieberi is usually found at high altitudes
on sandy soils (E. Esterhuysen pers. comm.). In Swart-
boschkloof this species is found at lower altitudes in
some places, such as in the area where the Rhus angusti-
folia-Ischyrolepis sieberi Shrubland mostly occurs. The
apparent reason for this is that the sandstone has slumped
into the valley on the west side, providing suitable con-
ditions for I. sieberi to grow at lower altitudes. In only a
few instances does the presence of I. sieberi overlap with
that of I. gaudichaudiana.
Protea repens is absent from the Rhus angustifolia-
Ischyrolepis sieberi Shrubland (Table 2). This may be
due to the habitat not being suitable for this species (al-
though this seems unlikely), or as a result of an acciden-
tal fire in September 1973 (Jonkershoek Forestry Re-
search Centre Records).
Most of the area occupied by the Rhus angustifolia-
Ischyrolepis sieberi Shrubland was affected by the 1973
fire. It was thus not in a mature state at the time of
sampling (as shown by the many Protea neriifolia shrubs
of about 12 years old scattered through the area) and
should therefore be interpreted with this in mind. It may
be that, given time, it would develop to become structural-
ly, but not floristically, like the Rhus angustifolia-
Maytenus oleoides Shrubland.
1.2. 1.2 Protea repens-Maytenus oleoides High Closed
Shrubland (J)
Campbell et al. (1981) structural equivalent: Tall Closed Proteoid
Shrubland
Differential species: this Community is characterized on the basis
of a combination of presence, absence and relative abundance of
species. It has no true differential species since it has many
species in common with other communities
Dominant species: Cliffortia rusci folia, Cymbopogon marginatus,
Diospyros glabra. Protea neriifolia, P. repens, Ischyrolepis gau-
dichaudiana, Restio triticeus
The Protea repens-Maytenus oleoides High Closed
Shrubland (Figure 10) is widespread but scattered in the
FIGURE 9. — Rhus angustifolia-
Ischyrolepis sieberi Tall
Closed Shrubland in the
foreground.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
251
FIGURE 10. — Protea repens-
Maytenus oleoides High
Closed Shrubland. Sections
of the range rod are 0,5 m,
total height is 2,5 m.
study area. It occurs as patches within th e Pro tea repens -
Nebelia paleacea Shrubland on the lower western slopes
as well as adjacent to the Boland Hiking Trail path be-
fore it reaches the ‘zig-zags’ up to the contour path.
Smaller stands are found alongside and above Jubilee
Creek on the south-eastern boundary, below the contour
path in the mid-central area, near the granite-sandstone
contact on the slopes in the south-westerly sector and
adjacent to the firebreak in the north-east corner.
Fry (1987) classified the soils where this shrubland
is found into the following forms and series: Clovelly
Form (Cv 11, Cv 24), Fernwood Form (Fw 11), Con-
stants Form (Ct 11) and Glenrosa Form (Gs 15). There
are some exceptions. The classification of the soils at
releves 103, 138, 153, 155, 156, 157 and 165 is either
not known or is unclear from Fry’s soil map.
Structurally this Community can be subdivided into
three strata. The high stratum (2—5 m), which is not
found in all stands of this Community, has an estimated
projected canopy cover of 55%. This stratum is com-
posed of shrubs and is dominated by Protea neriifolia
and P. repens. A tall shrub stratum (1—2 m) is found
below the high stratum. It has an estimated average pro-
jected canopy cover of 24% and is dominated by shrubs
Cliffortia cuneata, C. ruscifolia, Diospyros glabra. Erica
hispidula and Protea nitida. The short stratum (<1 m)
is composed mainly of grasses and restios. It is dominat-
ed by Aristea major, Cymbopogon marginatus, Ischyro-
lepis gaudichaudiana and Restio triticeus and has an
average projected canopy cover of 60% .
Since this is a transitional Community closely related
to the Ischyrolepis gaudichaudiana-Myrsine africana
Shrubland and Rhus angustifolia- Ischyrolepis sieberi
Shrubland (with species having affinity for sandstone-
derived soil) it is more or less a ‘sink’ for those releves
which cannot be unequivocally placed in ‘pure’ com-
munities. It has stronger affinities to those communities
found on heavier soils of granite or mixed derivation.
This is indicated by the constant presence of I. gaudi-
chaudiana.
1 .2.2 Protea repens-Nebelia paleacea High Closed
Shrubland
The Protea repens-Nebelia paleacea Shrubland con-
sists of two variants, the Nebelia paleacea-Erica sphae-
roidea High Closed Shrubland and the Nebelia paleacea-
Restio perplexus High Closed Shrubland. They occur on
shallow (<0,5 m), well drained, sandstone-derived soils
at altitudes between 400 and 950 m. The gradient of
slopes where these Communities occur ranges from
moderately steep to steep (14°— 40°) with an average
gradient of 27°. Aspect varies through all bearings ex-
cept south.
This transitional shrubland is most akin to the Com-
munities of the Erica hispidula- Ischyrolepis sieberi
Shrublands.
1. 2.2.1 Nebelia paleacea-Erica sphaeroidea High Closed
Shrubland (M)
Campbell et al. (1981) structural equivalent: Tall Closed Proteoid
Shrubland
Differential species: no true differential species are found here.
This Community is characterized by absence of many species
found in the previously described communities and presence of
species most allied to the Erica hispidula- Ischyrolepis sieberi
Shrubland Communities
Dominant species: Cliffortia cuneata, C. polygonifolia, C. rusci-
folia, Protea neriifolia, P. repens and Ischyrolepis sieberi
The Nebelia paleacea-Erica sphaeroidea Shrubland
(Figure 11) is widespread, occurring in small patches
at a number of different places in Swartboschkloof.
In the north-western sector it is found associated with
the Rhus angustifolia-Maytenus oleoides and Ischyro-
lepis sieberi-Nebelia paleacea Shrublands. On the east-
ern slopes it also occurs as part of a mosaic with the
latter Community. In the south-western sector it tends
to occur as more uniform stands over larger areas.
All the soils on which this Community is found are
derived from sandstone. They are well drained and are
usually <0,5 m deep. Fry (1987) classified these soils
252
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
into the Clovelly Form (Cv 11) and Femwood Form
(Fw 11) as well as a mixture of Clovelly and Glenrosa
Form. Rock cover estimates range from 10—90% with
an average of 45%. This average is almost twice as high
as the general average for rock cover in the study area.
Litter cover also has a wide range (10-90%) with an
average of 57% which is below average for the study
area.
The Community has two structural forms. Sixty per
cent of the releves representing the Nebelia paleacea-
Erica sphaeroidea Shrubland Community do not have
shrubs higher than two metres. The remaining 40%
(six releves) have a high stratum (2—5 m) similar to that
of the Protea repens-Rhus angustifolia Shrubland.
The first structural form is the ‘low-closed’ form. The
low stratum (<0,5 m) is dominant, with an average pro-
jected canopy cover of 72%. Dominant species in this
stratum are Blaeria dumosa, Ischyrolepis sieberi and
Thamnochortus gracilis. The short stratum (0,5—1 m)
has an average projected canopy cover of 58% and is
dominated by Cliffortia poly goni folia, C. ruscifolia,
Erica hispidula and Penaea mucronata. The tall stratum
(1—2 m) has an average projected canopy cover of 31%.
It is dominated by Brunia nodiflora, C. cuneata, C. poly-
gonifolia, Protea nitida and Watsonia pyramidata. The
second form or ‘high closed’ shrubland is dominated by
a high stratum (2—5 m) and has no low stratum. The
high stratum is dominated by C. ruscifolia, P. neriifolia
and P. repens. It has an average projected canopy cover
of 76% . The tall stratum (1—2 m), which has a project-
ed canopy cover of 1 6% , is dominated by B. nodiflora,
C. cuneata, C. poly goni folia and Penaea mucronata.
The short stratum has an average projected canopy cover
of 53% and is dominated by Ehrharta ramosa, Penta-
schistis colorata and Restio triticeus.
Floristic data collected in this study (Table 2) show
that the two structural forms described here, although
structurally different, cannot be separated on a floris-
tic basis.
1.2. 2. 2 Nebelia paleacea- Restio perplexus Low Closed
Shrubland (N)
Campbell et al. (1981) structural equivalent: Low Open Restioid
Shrubland
Differential species: no true differential species are found in this
Community. It lacks many species found in the previously de-
scribed communities
Dominant species: Blaeria dumosa, Cliffortia poly goni folia, Erica
hispidula. Protea repens, Restio perplexus, Watsonia pyramidata
The Nebelia paleacea- Restio perplexus Low Closed
Shrubland (Figure 12) was sampled at elevations of 485—
924 m with an average altitude of 757 m. It occurs main-
ly in three areas of Swartboschkloof. On the western
slopes it is found in patches associated with the Ischyro-
lepis sieberi-Nebelia paleacea Shrubland and the Protea
repens-Ischyrolepis gaudichaudiana Shrubland. In the
eastern part it occurs again as part of a mosaic with the
latter two Communities. In the south-eastern sector at
altitudes of 560—830 m, it occurs uniformly as pure
stands. At relatively high elevations (700—930 m) in the
south-western sector it is found in rocky situations, parti-
cularly on the cliffs close to the southern boundary.
The soils on which this Community is found are all
derived from sandstone. They are shallow, (0,1— 0,5 m)
with an average depth of 0,27 m. Fry (pers. comm.) did
not sample the soils where releves 129, 139, 142, 147,
154, 170, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 189 and 191 are
situated. The area where releves 176, 177, 178, 179 and
180 are situated are classified and mapped as a mosaic
of Clovelly and Glenrosa Forms (Fry 1987). The soil
series of releves 124 and 128 are of the Vilafontes (Vf
11) and Clovelly (Cv 11) Forms respectively.
The total projected canopy cover of the Nebelia
paleacea- Restio perplexus Shrubland is 89% on average.
It can be subdivided into four strata. The high stratum
has an average projected canopy cover of 31% and is
dominated by Protea neriifolia and P. repens. It was only
encountered in three releves: 124, 129 and 189. The
vegetation sampled at releve 128 would probably develop
a high stratum were it not for apparent severe wind-
FIGURE 11. — Nebelia paleacea-
Erica sphaeroidea High
Closed Shrubland.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
253
FIGURE 12. — Nebelia paleacea-
Restio perplexus Low
Closed Shrubland.
pruning. P. repens at this site has a high cover-abundance
score (4) but the shrubs do not reach more than 1 ,5 m
in height.
The tall stratum (1—2 m) is dominated by Brunia nodi-
flora, Cliffortia ruscifolia, C. polygonifolia, Diospyros
glabra and Erica hispidula. It has an average projected
canopy cover of 33% . The short stratum (0,5—1 m) has
an average projected canopy cover of 67% with Aristea
major, E. hispidula, Hypodiscus albo-aristatus, Restio
perplexus and Watsonia pyramidata dominant. The low
stratum (<0,5 m) has the highest average projected
canopy cover (75%). Dominant species in this stratum
are: Blaeria dumosa, Cymbopogon marginatus, Elegia
juncea, Pentaschistis colorata, P. curvifolia, Ischyrolepis
sieberi and Staberoha cernua.
Releves 124, 129 and 189 are structurally similar to
the ‘high closed’ form of the Nebelia paleacea- Erica
sphaeroidea Shrubland. However, these releves lack the
presence of species such as Anthospermum aethiopicum,
Protasparagus rubicundus, Erica sphaeroidea, Pteridium
aquilinum and Rhus angustifolia which would place
them in the latter Community.
1 .3 Erica hispidula-Ischyrolepis sieberi Shrublands
Two Shrubland Communities are found together here:
Ischyrolepis sieberi-Nebelia paleacea and Ischyrolepis
sieberi- Tetraria involucrata Shrublands (Table 3). They
occur at relatively high altitudes on shallow sandstone-
derived soils. I. sieberi has been used as one of the species
in the naming of these Communities because it prefers
sandstone-derived soils at higher altitudes (see descrip-
tion of Rhus angustifolia-Ischyrolepis sieberi Shrub-
land above).
1.3.1 Ischyrolepis sieberi-Nebelia paleacea Short Closed
Shrubland (P)
Campbell etal. (1981) structural equivalent: Low Closed Shrub-
land
Differential species: Berzelia intermedia, Cliffortia exilifolia,
Erica coccinea, Calopsis membranacea, Sympieza articulata, Te-
traria burmannii
Dominant species: Erica coccinea, E. hispidula, Nebelia paleacea,
Ischyrolepis sieberi, Tetraria capillacea
The Ischyrolepis sieberi-Nebelia paleacea Shrubland
(Figure 13) is found mostly on the slopes of the ridges
bordering the study area on the west and east sides and
in the south-east corner. Below the contour path in the
mid-western part it is found in patches associated with
the Nebelia paleacea- Restio perplexus Shrubland.
Three strata can be distinguished. The low stratum
(<0,5 m) has the highest projected canopy cover (76%).
Dominant species in this stratum include: Elegia juncea,
Ischyrolepis sieberi, Staberoha cernua and Tetraria capil-
lacea. The short stratum (0,5-1 m) has an average pro-
jected canopy cover of 58% and is dominated by Erica
hispidula and Nebelia paleacea. A tall stratum (1-2 m)
is found in ten releves and has an average projected canopy
cover of 20%. Dominant species in this stratum are
Brunia nodiflora, Cliffortia polygonifolia, Erica coccinea,
Nebelia paleacea and Protea neriifolia.
Sandstone is the parent material of all the soils on
which this Community is found. Fry (1987) sampled the
soils at releves 24, 25, 34, 90 and 91. These soils he clas-
sified as Clovelly (Cv 1 1) and Constantia (Ct 11) Forms.
From Fry’s (1987) soil map it is possible to classify the
soils of releves 117, 118, 119, 120, 121 and 127 as
Clovelly Form, Geelhout Series (Cv 11).
1.3.2 Ischyrolepis sieberi-Tetraria involucrata Short
Closed Shrubland (R)
Campbell et al. (1981) structural equivalent: Low Closed Restioid
Shrubland
Differential species: Tetraria involucrata
Dominant species: Cliffortia polygonifolia, Erica hispidula, Hy-
podiscus albo-aristatus, Ischyrolepis sieberi, Tetraria involucrata
The Ischyrolepis sieberi-Tetraria involucrata Shrub-
land (Figure 14) is found at the highest altitudes in the
254
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
study area, situated between 590 and 960 m, with an
average altitude of 840 m. Two strata are typically found
in this Community. The tall stratum (1-2 m) has an
average projected canopy cover of 1 1 % and is dominated
by emergent shrubs such as Cliffortia cuneata, C. poly-
goni folia and Penaea mucronata. Below this is a short
stratum (<1 m) which is dominated by Aristea major,
Elegia juncea, Hypodiscus albo-aristatus, Ischyrolepis
sieberi and Watsonia pyramidata. It has an average pro-
jected canopy cover of 78% .
In five releves a high shrub stratum (2—2,5 m) was
found. It has an average projected canopy cover of 38%
in these releves, but if taken over the Community as a
whole it has a much lower projected canopy cover of
7%. Dominant shrubs in this stratum are Cliffortia
cuneata, C. polygonifolia and Protea nitida. The high
shrub stratum is thought to be atypical of the Ischyrolepis
sieberi- Tetraria involucrata Shrubland as a whole.
Species such as Erica curvirostris, Hypodiscus arista-
tus, Pentaschistis curvifolia, P. malouinensis (= steudelii )
FIGURE 13. — Ischyrolepis siebe-
ri-Nebelia paleacea Short
Closed Shrubland.
Ischyrolepis capensis and Thamnochortus gracilis are
absent or have low presence and low cover-abundance
scores in the Ischyrolepis sieberi-Tetraria involucrata
Shrubland.
2 Riparian and Forest Communities
One group of Riparian and one group of Forest Com-
munities are distinguished.
2. 1 Hartogiella schinoides-Diospyros glabra Riparian
and Forest Communities
The Communities which make up the riparian and
forest vegetation are mostly associated with moist situa-
tions, often with running water in kloofs, gullies and
watercourses. Two groups of Communities are distin-
guished: the Diospyros glabra- Halleria elliptica High
Closed Shrubland to Short Forest and the Diospyros
glabra- Rapanea melanophloeos Tall Forest (Table 5).
FIGURE 14. — Ischyrolepis sieberi
-Tetraria involucrata Short
Closed Shrubland. Tall
shrubs are absent in this
photograph but it clearly
shows the grass-like differ-
ential species Tetraria in-
volucrata in the foreground.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
255
The two groups of Communities are floristically re-
lated but are different in many respects in terms of
habitat requirements. They are found at different alti-
tudes on slopes with different average gradients. The
two groups are also strikingly dissimilar with regard to
soil development and estimated rock and Utter cover.
The Halleria elliptica- Cliff or tia cuneata Shrubland
is at the interface between the MMF and the Riparian
Communities. This Community has a large proportion
of MMF species as weU as some forest species. It there-
fore forms a link between the MMF and forest vegetation
types in Swartboschkloof.
2.1.1 Halleria elliptica- Brabejum stellatifolium Short
Forest (T)
Campbell et al. (1981) structural equivalent: Short Forest
Differential species: Brabejum stellatifolium is shared with the
Halleria elliptica- Cliffortia cuneata High Closed Shrubland and
the Rapanea melanophloeos-Cunonia capensis High Forest.
Blechnum australe is shared with both the above Communities
and the Rapanea melanophloeos-Heeria argentea Short Forest
Dominant species: Blechnum australe, Brabejum stellatifolium
and Halleria elliptica
The Halleria elliptica- Brabejum stellatifolium Short
Forest (Figure 15) is distinctive in physiognomic ap-
pearance and relatively easy to distinguish from the
other Forest Communities, except where it intergrades
with the Rapanea melanophloeos-Cunonia capensis
Forest. It is found in drainage lines in the lower reaches
of the study area.
The releves of this Community are on Oakleaf Form
soils (Fry 1987). The soils of the other two releves were
not classified, but it was observed that they are com-
posed of granite and sandstone material. The latter two
sites are wet in winter when run-off water fills the drain-
age lines and is not confined to the main streams.
The vegetation has a projected canopy cover of 100%;
it is very dense and almost impenetrable. The crowns of
the individual plants of Brabejum stellatifolium inter-
lock creating shady conditions for plants in the under-
storey.
Three strata are distinguished in this Community. The
upper stratum (3—6 m) has an estimated cover of 97%
and is dominated by Brabejum stellatifolium which
reaches the stature of a short forest. Below the upper
stratum is a layer 1— 3 m high which can have a percent-
age cover ranging from 5-80% , with an average of 35% .
Dominant species in this stratum are Diospyros glabra,
Halleria elliptica and Rhus angustifolia. This stratum was
not found in releve 110. A short to low stratum (<1 m)
was found in three releves (all except releve 109) with an
average percentage cover of 29%. The dominant species
in this stratum is Blechnum australe.
2.1.2 Halleria elliptica-Cliffortia cuneata High Closed
Shrubland (S)
Campbell et al. (1981) structural equivalent: Tall Closed Shrub-
land
Differential species: see Table 5
Dominant species: Brabejum stellatifolium, Cliffortia cuneata,
Halleria elliptica. Protea nitida, Pteridium aquilinum
The Halleria elliptica-Cliffortia cuneata Shrubland is
found on the forest margins at the interface between the
MMF Communities and the Riparian Forest Communities,
at altitudes of 320—560 m.
The soils on which this Community is found are de-
rived from granite and sandstone. They average 0,5 m
in depth and are classified into the Hutton (Hu 24),
Femwood (Fw 31), Magwa (Ma 10) and Oakleaf (Oa
34) Forms. Most of the sites are well drained. The only
site subject to seasonal waterlogging is at releve 5, situat-
ed on Fernwood Form (Fw 31) soils.
The vegetation of the Halleria elliptica-Cliffortia
cuneata Shrubland has a high average projected canopy
cover (96%), ranging from 88% to 100%. Three strata
are distinguished. The highest stratum (2—4 m) is domi-
nated by Brabejum stellatifolium, Cliffortia cuneata and
Protea nitida. It has an average projected canopy cover
FIGURE 15. — Halleria ettiptica-
Brabejum stellatifolium
Short Forest. The {cm, Pte-
ridium aquilinum in the
right foreground is absent
under the forest canopy.
256
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
of 22%. Below the high stratum is a tall stratum (1—2
m) with an average projected canopy cover of 41% . The
tall stratum is dominated by Diospyros glabra and Hal-
leria elliptica. A short stratum (<1 m) with an average
projected canopy cover of 54% is found below the tall
stratum. This layer is dominated by Aristea major and
Pteridium aquilinum.
This Community is floristically closely akin to the ls-
chyrolepis gaudichaudiana-Myrsine africana High Closed
Shrubland. These two communities could be considered
to be one were it not for the presence of Brabejum stel-
latifolium in the Halleria elliptica -Cliff ortia cuneata
Shrubland.
2.2 Diospyros glabra- Rapanea melanophloeos Tall
Forest (W)
Campbell et al. (1981) structural equivalent: Tall Forest
Differential species: no true differential species are found in this
Community
Dominant species: Hartogiella schinoides, Maytenus acuminata,
Olinia ventosa, Podocarpus elongatus, Rapanea melanophloeos
The Diospyros glabra- Rapanea melanophloeos Tall
Forest (Figure 16) is the typical variant of the second
group of Forest Communities. It is found on stabilized
boulder screes below the sandstone cliffs in the south-
central and southwest parts of the study area.
There is very little soil development on the boulder
screes. What soil there is amongst the boulders is humus.
Fry (1987) simply mapped these areas as screes or es-
tablished screes. It was noted that the Diospyros glabra -
Rapanea melanophloeos Tall Forest Community occurs
where the boulder scree has stabilized. On less stable
screes it is most likely more difficult for trees to become
established, whereas on stabilized boulder scree trees can
develop fully.
The development of these forests probably also de-
pends largely on moisture availability. Apart from the
dense canopy which creates shady, cool, moist condi-
tions on the ground, there is also perennial percolation
FIGURE 16. — Diospyros glabra-
Rapanea melanophloeos
Tall Forest on sandstone
boulder scree.
of water through the rock crevices. This water is trapped
on the upper slopes of the catchment, it runs over the
cliffs, percolates through the boulder screes and finally
runs into the main streams which drain Swartboschkloof.
The trees can exploit this water as it passes through the
boulder screes.
The canopy trees, mainly Hartogiella schinoides, Olinia
ventosa and Podocarpus elongatus reach 8-20 m in
height. As noted above, they form a dense canopy with
only a few patches through which light can penetrate.
The cover of this stratum is estimated at 77%. Releves
1 13 and 193 do not have a canopy which reaches 20 m.
The height of the canopy of these latter stands is com-
parable to the height of the subcanopy (2—8 m) of the
forest stands in the other releves. However, they still
have the same dominant species. The subcanopy is domi-
nated by Halleria lucida, Maytenus acuminata, Podocar-
pus elongatus and Rapanea melanophloeos and has an
average projected canopy cover of 63%. Below the sub-
canopy there is a ground layer (<1 m), with Myrsiphyl-
lum scandens, Knowltonia vesicatoria and Zantedeschia
aethiopica most common. The ground layer has an
average projected canopy cover of 1 1 % . A climber, Seca-
mone alpinii, is found entwined in subcanopy shrubs
and trees.
Van der Merwe (1966) referred to this Community
under the general title, ‘Dasbosse of woude op talus’
(Dasbosse or forest on talus). He did not distinguish
between the typical variant, the Diospyros glabra-
Rapanea melanophloeos Tall Forest and the Rapanea
melanophloeos- Heeria argentea Short Forest. Heyns
(1957) in a study of the forest communities at Asse-
gaaibos (near Swartboschkloof) also made no distinc-
tion between these two variants. Werger et al. (1972),
however, distinguished them. The former community
they designated as the ‘ Rapanea melanophloeos Com-
munity’ and the latter as the ‘ Heeria argentea Com-
munity’.
2.2.1 Rapanea melanophloeos- Cunonia capensis High
Forest (U)
Campbell et al. (1981) structural equivalent: Tall Forest
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
257
Differential species: Blechnum punctulatum, Brachylaena nerii-
folia, Dipogon lignosus, Ehrharta erecta. Hex mitis, Kobresia
lancea, Oxalis sp., Sanicula europaea, Todea barbara
Dominant species: Brabejum stellatifolium, Cunonia capensis,
Hex mitis, Maytenus acuminata, Rapanea melanophloeos
The Rapanea melanophloeos- Cunonia capensis High
Forest is the second variant of the Diospyros glabra-
Rapanea melanophloeos Forest. It is found along the
main drainage lines and streams with perennial running
water. It is restricted to the streambanks and can be seen
as a narrow ribbon of dark-coloured vegetation following
the main watercourses. In the mid-central region of the
study area it is well developed, particularly around the
middle reaches of the main Swartboschkloof stream. At
this point two tributary streams flow into the main
stream. This Community does not occur in relatively
short, seasonal drainage lines where the Halleria elliptica-
Brabejum stellatifolium Short Forest is found.
The Rapanea melanophloeos- Cunonia capensis Forest
from the middle to upper reaches of the Jubilee Creek
is fragmented. This is probably due to a lack of strong
perennial water flow and the nature of the boulder bed,
which is like a boulder scree in places.
Soil development is minimal. The soil that is present
is usually a mixture of sand and humus that accumulates
on the banks of the streams. This alluvial soil material
is often washed away when the streams rise in winter
after heavy rains. These soils are not described by Fry
(1987) who simply refers to the streams as ‘incised drain-
age lines’.
There are two tree strata in this Community. The
highest stratum (8—25 m) is dominated by Cunonia
capensis, Ilex mitis, Rapanea melanophloeos and Brabe-
jum stellatifolium. It has an estimated cover of 88%.
The subcanopy (1—8 m) has an estimated cover of
38%. It is dominated by Maytenus acuminata, Halleria
lucida and Brabejum stellatifolium. The undergrowth is
estimated to have an average cover of 16%. Dominant
species in the ground layer are: Myrsiphyllum scandens,
Blechnum australe and Kobresia lancea.
Van der Merwe (1966) included the vegetation de-
scribed as the Rapanea melanophloeos-Cunonia capen-
sis High Forest in this study in his broad concept of
‘Oewergemeenskappe’ (streambank communities). Werger
et al. (1972) did not distinguish the streambank forests
as a separate community from the tall forests on the
boulder screes. The reason for this is that they only had
two samples (releve 30 & 32) in the tall to high forest
vegetation which represents the Diospyros glabra-Rapa-
nea melanophloeos Forest variant.
2.2.2 Rapanea melanophloeos-Heeria argentea Short
Forest (V)
Campbell et al. (1981) structural equivalent: Low Forest
Differential species: Heeria argentea
Dominant species: Hartogiella schinoides, Heeria argentea, May-
tenus acuminata, Podocarpus elongatus
This variant of the Diospyros glabra- Rapanea melano-
phloeos Forest occurs on loose, unstable boulder screes
and on rocky outcrops. In Swartboschkloof it is best
developed at two localities: one on a boulder scree be-
low the contour path near the south-east boundary and
the other on a scree in the south-west sector of Swart-
boschkloof adjacent to the path to Haelkop Ridge. It is
found in drier situations than the Diospyros glabra -
Rapanea melanophloeos Forest, where drainage is good.
The Rapanea melanophloeos-Heeria argentea Short
Forest does not occur at altitudes higher than 700 m in
Swartboschkloof and since the boulder screes face north-
east to north, this Community is exposed to high temper-
atures and insolation.
There is little or no soil development on the boulder
screes where the Rapanea melanophloeos-Heeria argen-
tea Short Forest is found.
A single tree stratum and a field layer are distinguish-
ed. The tree stratum (2—8 m) has a projected cover of
80% and is dominated by Hartogiella schinoides, Heeria
argentea, Olinia ventosa and Maytenus acuminata. Below
this is a short stratum (< 1 m) where Podocarpus elonga-
tus often spreads in a prostrate fashion on the boulders.
Other species in this stratum include Aloe mitriformis,
Blechnum australe, Knowltonia vesicatoria and Rumohra
adiantiformis. None of these species is dominant and
Aloe mitriformis is found where the canopy is open.
Secamone alpinii is found from ground level into the
subcanopy climbing amongst other plants.
Van der Merwe (1966) did not distinguish or describe
a community with Heeria argentea as an important spe-
cies. Werger et al. (1972) described the Heeria argentea
Community, but two of the three releves (15 & 16)
used to characterize this Community were situated out-
side Swartboschkloof, in the adjacent Sosyskloof catch-
ment. The Rapanea melanophloeos-Heeria argentea
Short Forest is restricted to a few patches on the rock
screes in the study area and although Werger et al.
(1972) recorded high cover-abundance scores for Heeria
argentea in their releves, this was not found to be general-
ly true in Swartboschkloof.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
Two vegetation types are recognized on the basis of
their floristic composition and structure, namely MMF
and Forest. Sixteen MMF communities were identified
which are grouped into three groups. The first MMF
group includes the azonal hygrophilous communities
and the shrublands associated with soils of granite or
colluvial derivation. The second or intermediate group
includes the transitional or ecotonal communities that
fall between those communities associated with granite-
derived and colluvial soils and the third group which
consists of the communities associated with sandstone-
derived soils. Five Forest Communities are recognized,
grouped into two groups. The first group consists of a
community transition between MMF and Forest vegeta-
tion, and a short Forest Community along seasonal drain-
age lines. The second group of Forest Communities com-
prises the three variants of the Diospyros glabra- Rapanea
melanophloeos Forest.
The forests at Swartboschkloof are poorer in species
than the forests of Table Mountain (Campbell & Moll
258
1977; McKenzie, Moll & Campbell 1977) or the Kogel-
berg (Boucher 1978). This difference is probably due to
the substrate on which these respective forests are found.
In Swartboschkloof the forests are found on sandstone
boulder screes and along boulder-lined watercourses;
at Orange Kloof, Table Mountain and in places in the
Kogelberg the forests are found along watercourses but
often on soils derived from shale. The shale-derived soils
are much finer-textured (Campbell 1983) than the rocky
scree substrates and they are richer in nutrients. This
may be a reason for the greater diversification of the
forest flora at Orange Kloof and in the Kogelberg in
contrast to Swartboschkloof.
Correlation between the distribution of the plant
communities and the occurrence of the soil forms is
generally good, whereas relating plant communities to
soil series is more difficult except in some instances
where the communities are localized and reflect specific
edaphic conditions. An example of this is the ‘tall’ form
of the Rhus angustifolia-Zantedeschia aethiopica Shrub-
land which is found on deep organic soils of the Cham-
pagne Form (Ch 11). Localized communities on phreatic
sites such as the Berzelia lanuginosa- Merxmuellera cinc-
ta Shrubland may also be associated with specific soil
series, in this case with Fernwood Form (Fw 31).
Perhaps the most important aspects arising from the
correlation of the soils with the vegetation are the
broad relationships between the groups of communi-
ties and the soil geology, rather than specific communi-
ties associated with specific soil forms or series (McDonald
1987). This is demonstrated by the relationship between
the tall to high shrublands occurring on granite-derived
or colluvial soils where the soils are deep, have a higher
clay content due to the granite weathering and are
probably more nutrient-rich. The sandstone-derived
soils have less clay, fewer nutrients, lower pH and are
shallow. These soils consequently support a shorter vege-
tation with more restios and sedges than shrubs. Camp-
bell (1983) presented results which suggest that soil
texture variables and not chemical variables are impor-
tant in distinguishing quartzite-derived soils from non-
quartzitic soils. This may offer some explanation for
the distribution of plant communities in Swartbosch-
kloof, particularly in the case of the lschyrolepis gau-
dichaudiana-Myrsine africana Shrubland (Waboomveld
sensu Taylor 1963) and in the transitional communities,
where rockiness is considered to be important.
A striking feature of the MMF vegetation of Swart-
boschkloof is the lack of co-incidence between the struc-
ture of the vegetation and the boundaries of the com-
munities (Werger et al. 1972). In the present study, this
feature was noted particularly in the Protea- dominated
shrublands. Widespread tall to high shrubs with high
cover-abundance, like Protea neriifolia, extend across
and mask floristically-determined community bounda-
ries. A suggested explanation for this is the prevalence
of extreme habitat factors or the occurrence of extreme
events such as fires which result in deceptive boundaries
(Werger et al. 1972). This explanation is borne out by
the structure of the Rhus angustifolia- lschyrolepis
sieberi Shrubland which can be attributed largely to the
accidental fire of September, 1973. The pre- and post-
fire structural definitions of the Rhus angustifolia-
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
lschyrolepis sieberi Shrubland do not agree, yet floris-
tically the community appears to have remained the
same. The lack of co-incidence between the floristic
boundaries and the structural boundaries of the shrub-
lands of the lower to middle slopes is attributed to
edaphic factors rather than to extremes of climate or to
fire. This is particularly so since this vegetation was
considered to be mature at the time of sampling.
Since the greater part of Swartboschkloof has a north-
erly aspect, it is not easy to assess the effect of aspect on
plant growth. A few slopes face southwards but these
slopes do not support vegetation noticeably different
from that in the rest of the study area. North-west-
facing slopes most likely intercept more rain in winter
than slopes with other aspects, but once again any notice-
able effect on community structure or composition is
not apparent. One Community, the Myrsine africana-
Cliffortia dentata Shrubland is found on cool north-east
to south-east-facing slopes. In this instance the type of
vegetation could be attributed to aspect but a more
likely explanation is that moisture is almost always
available to this Community from a perennial seep on
the steep slopes above.
The last major fire in Swartboschkloof prior to the
work as reported here was in February 1958. The vege-
tation had apparently recovered to its former stature and
composition except in the area subsequently burnt in
September, 1973. In March 1987 Swartboschkloof was
burnt under controlled conditions in a planned manage-
ment burn. Therefore the communities as described here
represent the expression of the vegetation in its ‘mature
phase’, not in the early successional phase as presently
found in Swartboschkloof.
The distribution of the plant communities in Swart-
boschkloof is not determined by any single factor but
by an interaction of all the environmental factors men-
tioned (McDonald 1987). As Campbell (1983) points
out, it is difficult to separate the effects of the environ-
mental factors, such as the effects of soil from the ef-
fects of climate. No single environmental component
can be treated in isolation although it does appear that
in Swartboschkloof, water availability and soil geology
play a dominant role in determining the pattern of com-
munity distribution.
Comparisons between the plant communities of
Swartboschkloof and other Mountain Fynbos vegeta-
tion show similarities between at least some of the
communities. It appears that there are probably a limited
number of ‘habitat types’ on the Cape mountains (Camp-
bell 1983). These habitat types are often characterized
by functionally and structurally similar plant communi-
ties, even though, owing to local factors, their species
composition may differ. A good example is the parallel
between the Leptocarpus membranaceus (now Calopsis
membranacea)-Hypodiscus aristatus Community on
Table Mountain (McKenzie et al. 1977), the Willdenowia
sulcata Communities at Jakkalsrivier (Kruger 1974) and
the lschyrolepis sieberi-Nebelia paleacea Shrubland at
Swartboschkloof. This supports the view expressed by
Werger et al. (1972) that to classify fynbos vegetation
it will be necessary to ‘distinguish geographical races of
an association, or regional associations with a limited
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
259
geographical extension’. The present study, which is
a re-evaluation and extension of their work, serves as a
pointer to possible future research on the interactions
between plant communities and the physical environ-
ment at Swartboschkloof.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The contributions of the following people to this
study are gratefully acknowledged: the Director and
staff of the Botanical Research Institute, especially
Mr H.C. Taylor, Dr J.C. Scheepers and Miss M. Morley;
Mr C. Boucher, Botany Department, University of
Stellenbosch; my wife, Anne, who typed the original
manuscript; the staff of the Jonkershoek Forestry
Research Centre and Prof. E.J. Moll, Department of
Botany, University of Cape Town. The Director-General
Environment Affairs kindly granted permission to work
at Swartboschkloof.
REFERENCES
BARKMAN, J.J., MORAVEC, J. & RAUSCHERT, S. 1986. Code
of phytosociological nomenclature. Vegetatio 67: 145-
195.
BOUCHER, C. 1977. Cape Hangklip Area. I. The application of
association-analysis, homogeneity functions and Braun-
Blanquet techniques in the description of south-western
Cape vegetation. Bothalia 12: 292-300.
BOUCHER, C. 1978. Cape Hangklip Area. II. The vegetation.
Bothalia 12: 455-497.
CAMPBELL, B.M. 1983. Montane plant environments in the
Fynbos Biome. Bothalia 14: 283-298.
CAMPBELL, B.M. 1985. A classification of the mountain vege-
tation of the Fynbos Biome. Memoirs of the Botanical
Survey of South Africa No. 50.
CAMPBELL, B.M. & MOLL, E.J. 1977. The forest communities
of Table Mountain, South Africa. Vegetation: 105—115.
CAMPBELL, B.M. & MOLL, E.J. 1981. Determination of plot
size. Bothalia 13: 575-576.
CAMPBELL, B.M., COWLING, R.M., BOND, W. J ,, KRUGER, F. J.
& COLLABORATORS 1981. Structural characterization
of vegetation in the Fynbos Biome. South African National
Scientific Programmes Report No. 52. CSIR, Pretoria.
EDWARDS, D. 1983. A broad-scale structural classification of
vegetation for practical purposes. Bothalia 14: 705-712.
FRY, M. St.L. 1987. A detailed characterization of soils under
different fynbos- climate- geology combinations in the
south-western Cape. M.Sc. thesis. University of Stellen-
bosch.
HEYNS, A.J. 1957. Flora, fenologie en regenerasie van ’n in-
heemse woudgemeenskap naby Stellenbosch. Journal of
South A frican Botany 23: 111-119.
KOPPEN, W. 1931. Grundriss der Klimakunde. De Gruyter,
Berlin.
KRUGER, F.J. 1974. The physiography and plant communities
of Jakkalsrivier catchment. M.Sc. (Forestry) thesis, Uni-
versity of Stellenbosch.
MACV1CAR, C.N., DE VILLIERS, J.M., LOXTON.R.F., VER-
STER, E., LAMBRECHTS, J.J.N., MERRYWEATHER,
F.R., LE ROUX, J., VAN ROOYEN, T.H. & HARMSE,
H.J. VON M. 1977. Soil classification: a binomial system
for South Africa. Department of Agricultural Technical
Services, Pretoria.
MCDONALD, D.J. 1983. The vegetation of Swartboschkloof,
Jonkershoek, Cape Province, South Africa. M.Sc. thesis,
University of Cape Town.
MCDONALD, D.J. 1985. The plant communities of Swartbosch-
kloof, Jonkershoek. South African National Scientfic
Programmes Report No. 104. CSIR, Pretoria.
MCDONALD, D.J. 1987. Ordination by detrended correspond-
ence analysis (DCA) of the vegetation of Swartboschkloof,
Jonkershoek, Cape Province. Bothalia 17: 121-129.
MCDONALD, D.J. & MORLEY, M. 1988. A checklist of the
flowering plants and ferns of Swartboschkloof, Jonkers-
hoek, Cape Province. Bothalia 18:
MCKENZIE, B., MOLL, E.J. & CAMPBELL, B.M. 1977. A phy-
tosociological study of Orange Kloof, Table Mountain,
South Africa. Vegetatio 34: 41-53.
MOLL, E.J., CAMPBELL, B.M., COWLING, R.M., BOSSI, L.,
JARMAN, M.L. & BOUCHER, C. 1984. A description of
the major vegetation categories in and adjacent to the
Fynbos Biome. South African National Scientific Program-
mes Report No. 83. CSIR, Pretoria.
MUELLER-DOMBOIS, D. & ELLENBERG, H. 1974. Aims and
methods of vegetation ecology. John Wiley, New York.
RUST, I.C. 1967. On the sedimentation of the Table Mountain
Group in the western Cape Province. D.Sc. thesis, Univer-
sity of Stellenbosch.
SOUTH AFRICAN SYNTAXONOMIC NOMENCLATURE
COMMITTEE (MS.). The standardization of syntaxono-
mic nomenclature.
TAUAARD, M.S. 1949. A glimpse of South Africa University
Publishers, Stellenbosch.
TAYLOR, H.C. 1963. A bird’s-eye view of Cape mountain
vegetation. Journal of the Botanical Society of South
Africa 59: 11-19.
TAYLOR, H.C. 1978. Capensis. In M.J.A. Werger, Biogeography
and ecology of southern Africa. Junk, The Hague.
VAN DER MERWE, P. 1966. Die flora van Swartboskloof, Stel-
lenbosch en die herstel van die soorte na ’n brand. Annale
van die Universiteit van Stellenbosch 41, Serie A, 14: 691-
736.
VAN WILGEN, B.W. 1981. Some effects of fire frequency on
fynbos plant community composition and structure at
Jonkershoek, Stellenbosch. South African Forestry Jour-
nal 118: 42-45.
WERGER, M.J.A. 1972. Species area relationships and plot size:
with some examples from South African vegetation. Botha-
lia 10: 583-594.
WERGER, M.J.A. 1974. On concepts and techniques applied in
the ZUrich-Montpellier method of vegetation survey. Botha-
lia 11: 309-323.
WERGER, M.J. A., KRUGER, F.J.& TAYLOR, H.C. 1972. A phy-
tosociological study of the Cape fynbos and other vegeta-
tion at Jonkershoek, Stellenbosch. Bothalia 10: 599-614.
WICHT, C.L., MEYBURGH, J.C. & BOUSTEAD, P.G. 1969.
Rainfall at the Jonkershoek Forest Hydrological Research
Station. Annale van die Universiteit van Stellenbosch 44,
Serie A, 1: 1-66.
APPENDIX
Species excluded from Tables 1, 2, 3 & 4 (releves and cover-
abundance values in parentheses). See also checklist (McDonald
& Morley 1988).
Adenandra marginata (111: 1)
Agathosma cf. serpyllacea (69: +)
Argyrolobium lunaris (119: R)
Aristea africana (28: +)
Artemisia afra (28: +)
A sclepias cancellata (41: +)
Aspalathus retro flexa (152: 2)
Brabejum stellatifolium (102: 0, 59: 0)
Berkheya sp. (151: +)
Blechnum sylvaticum (102: +)
Centella calliodus (18: +, 105: R)
Cheilanthes contracta (138: 0)
Chrysocoma coma-aurea (157: +)
Cliffortia
complanata (120: 0)
graminea (102: 0)
integerrima (153: 0)
pterocarpa (123: 1)
Clutia pterogona (37: +)
Conyza ulmifolia (63: 1)
Crassula dejecta (123: +)
Dodonaea viscosa (1: 0)
Elytropappus
glandulosus (1: 0)
gnaphaloides (1: 0)
Erica
cori folia (133: +)
lutea (121: +)
sp. (46: +)
260
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
sp. (149: R)
Euphorbia erythrina (31: +)
Harvey a capensis (131: R)
Helichrysum
asperum (103: +)
nudifolium (33: R)
sp. (99: R)
Heliophila sc op aria (138: +)
Hibiscus aethiopicus ( 1 : 1 )
Lampranthus acutifolius (149: +)
Leptocarpus esterhuyseniae (133: +)
Leucospermum lineare (40: +)
Linum
africanum (157: +)
quadrifolium (4: +)
Microloma tenuifolium (165: R)
Othonna quinquedentata (180: 1)
Passerina vulgaris (12: +)
Pelargonium cucullatum (18: +)
Pentameris thuarii (32: +)
Peucedamm galbaniopse (179: +)
Podalyria cf. calyptrata (4: 0)
Poly gala garcinii (180: +)
Priestleya sp. cf. tomentosa (30: +)
Prismatocarpus tenerrimus (145: R)
Rafnia capensis (55: 0)
Restio
sp. cf. monanthus (31: +)
pusillus (158: +)
Rubus rigidus (64: +)
Salvia sp. (99: R)
Scirpus
sp. (99: 1)
venustulus (143: R)
Sebaea exacoides (92: 0)
Solarium retroflexum (79: 0)
Stoebe
prostrata (143: +)
cf. cilia t a (13: 0)
Struthiola myrsinites (96: 1)
Tetraria
sp. cf. crassa (191: +)
sp. (25: +)
Thamnochortus cf. dichotomus (10: +)
Thesium
strictum (4: +)
sp. (191: +)
Todea barbara ( 151: 0)
Ursinia dentata (144: 0)
Species excluded from Table 5 (releves and cover-abundance
values in parentheses)
Anemia simii (110: +)
Asclepias cancellata (6: 0)
Aristea sp. cf. confusa (35: 0)
Centella sp. cf. eriantha (94: +)
Cen tella flexuosa (114: +)
Conyza floribunda (194: +)
Cullumia setosa (94: 2)
Ficinia trichodes (3: 1)
Galium mucroniferum (167: +)
Gleichenia polypodioides (114: 2 )
Leucadendron salignum (35: 0)
Merxmuellera stricta (116: +)
Olea capensis (116: +)
Osmitopsis asteriscoides (167 : +)
Otholobium obliquum (166: +)
Passiflora quadrangularis (163: +)
Penaea mucronata (3 : 2)
Pentaschistis aristidoides (202: 0)
Phylica spicata (3 : +)
Podalyria sp. cf. montana (110: 1)
Psoralea pinnata (35 : 0)
Restio sp. cf. monanthus (6: 1)
Salvia chamelaeagnea ( 166: +)
Scirpus ecklonii (114: +)
Tetraria
cuspidata (166: +)
sp. (6: +)
Ursinia pinnata OS '- +)
Watsonia pyramidata ( 3: +)
Bothalia 18,2: 261-270 (1988)
A checklist of the flowering plants and ferns of Swartboschkloof,
Jonkershoek, Cape Province
D.J. McDonald* and M. MORLEY*
Keywords: checklist, ferns, flowering plants, Swartboschkloof
ABSTRACT
A list of flowering plants and ferns of Swartboschkloof is presented. This list represents a combination of
species recorded in Van der Merwe (1966), Werger, Kruger & Taylor (1972), McDonald (1983, 1985) and specimens
collected from Swartboschkloof housed in the Government Herbarium, Stellenbosch (STE) and the Wicht Herba-
rium, Jonkershoek (JF). The checklist is analysed and the flora of Swartboschkloof compared with the respective
floras of Cape Hangklip and Cape Point ( sensu Taylor 1985).
UITTREKSEL
’n Lys van blomplante en varings van Swartboschkloof word verskaf. Hierdielysverteenwoordig’nkombinasie
van spesies aangeteken in Van der Merwe (1966), Werger, Kruger & Taylor (1972), McDonald (1983, 1985) en
eksemplare wat in Swartboschkloof versamel is en in die Staatsherbarium, Stellenbosch (STE) en die Wicht-
herbarium, Jonkershoek (JF) gehuisves word. Die kontrolelys word ontleed en die flora van Swartboschkloof
word met die onderskeie floras van Kaap Hangklip en Kaappunt (sensu Taylor 1985) vergelyk.
INTRODUCTION
Checklists, although cumbersome to publish, have
proved valuable to workers involved in vegetation research
as well as to phytogeographers in their attempts to deter-
mine the relationships within and between different
floras (Kruger & Taylor 1979; Taylor 1979). C. Boucher
and H.C. Taylor (pers. comms) have indicated that there
has been much demand for checklists compiled by them-
selves (Boucher 1977; Taylor 1955, 1985) and by Olivier
(1979, 1983).
This list has been compiled in order to facilitate iden-
tification of plant taxa encountered during the intensive
research being undertaken at Swartboschkloof (cf.
McDonald 1985, Van Wilgen et al. 1986). It will also
serve as a record of species found since the last fire in
Swartboschkloof (1958) and before the controlled burn
of the 17th March 1987. Careful plant collecting after
the fire will probably lead to a number of additions to
the list of species, particularly of geophytic taxa.
STUDY AREA
Details of the location and physiography of the study
site are given in McDonald (1983, 1985, 1988).
METHODS
The Government Herbarium, Stellenbosch (STE) and
the Wicht Herbarium, Jonkershoek (JF), which are
thought to house most of the plant specimens collected
at Swartboschkloof, were systematically searched (by M.
Morley) for all specimens collected in the area. Lists were
* Botanical Research Unit, P.O. Box 471, Stellenbosch 7600.
MS. received: 1987.08.19.
made of species names with their respective collectors’
names and numbers for future inclusion in a master list.
The checklist presented here is based 1 , on the collec-
tions made by the senior author; 2, on collections made by
Van der Merwe (1966); 3, on species contained in the
Braun-Blanquet tables of Werger, Kruger & Taylor (1972)
and of McDonald (1983); 4, on specimens collected by
other collectors and 5, field specimens (‘ecoscraps’)
collected by the senior author. Where ‘voucher’ speci-
mens are not indicated, taxa were identified in the field
and noted as ‘field observations’.
In the checklist, the collection numbers of herbarium
specimens collected by the senior author (housed in
STE) are indicated in parentheses e.g. (797); numbers in
square brackets e.g. [910/2] refer to field herbarium
specimens (‘ecoscraps’) housed at the Botanical Research
Unit, Stellenbosch. Cited collections made by other
collectors are given in the format: (Van der Merwe, P.
25). Where no voucher specimens have been collected or
elected from existing herbarium specimens, [S.R.] is used
to denote ‘site record’. If the source of information is a
publication only, the author and publication date are
quoted in square brackets e.g. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966].
Species marked with an asterisk (*) are those species
included in the Braun-Blanquet tables presented by
McDonald (1983).
The list has been updated as far as possible following
Gibbs Russell eta/. (1984, 1985, 1987). In the few cases
where discrepancies exist between the latter three publi-
cations and Bond & Goldblatt (1984), the names used
by Bond & Goldblatt (1984) have been quoted (except
for the Liliaceae) because this publication pertains to the
Cape Flora in particular. Recent revisions such as that of
the Restionaceae (Linder 1984, 1985) and the tribe
Psoraleeae (Papilionoideae, Fabaceae) by Stirton (1986)
have also been taken into account in the final preparation
of the checklist.
262 Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
TABLE 1. — Analysis of the indigenous vascular plant flora of Swartboschkloof. Values in parentheses are from Van der Merwe (1966)
Pteridophytes Gymnosperms Monocots Dicots
No. % of total No. % of total No. % of total No. % of total
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A total of 65 1 vascular plant species have been record-
ed from Swartboschkloof. This total exceeds that record-
ed by Van der Merwe (1966) by 192 species. This increase
may be attributed to factors such as the following: (i)
the area currently included in Swartboschkloof is 3,73
km2 compared with the 1,82 km2 surveyed by Van der
Merwe (1966); (ii) more general plant collecting has
taken place since Van der Merwe’s survey; (iii) plant
collecting has taken place through the successional stages
of the vegetation since the fire in 1958, leading to a
‘sample’ well representative of Swartboschkloof over the
past 28 years.
An analysis of the flora of Swartboschkloof is given
in Table 1; figures from Van der Merwe’s (1966) survey
are given in parentheses. A comparison of the latter
figures and those of the present record show that except
for the gymnosperms there has been an increase in the
number of families, genera and species recorded. Taylor
(1985) comments on the higher ratio of monocot to
dicot species at Cape Point (1:1,65) compared with
equivalent ratios for the Cape Peninsula (1:2,02) and at
Cape Hangklip (1:2,0). The ratio of monocot to dicot
species for Swartboschkloof (1:1,89) falls at the mean
values for the ratios quoted above.
The species recorded from Swartboschkloof represent
48% of the total number of species (1353) recorded for
Jonkershoek State Forest as a whole (P. Brown pers.
comm.), an area covering about 45 km2 (Taylor 1979;
Kruger & Taylor 1979). The flora of Swartboschkloof,
which occupies about eight per cent of the total area of
Jonkershoek, may therefore be considered to be fairly
rich. However, most of the species found in Swartbosch-
kloof are also found in other parts of Jonkershoek —
only one endemic species, Heliophila cuneata Marais, is
known from Swartboschkloof. The beta diversity (be-
tween-habitat diversity) for Swartboschkloof is therefore
considered to be low in relation to Jonkershoek as a
whole. This suggests a relatively low number of habitats
in Swartboschkloof as compared to Jonkershoek.
The species record for Swartboschkloof has been
analysed following the appproach of Boucher (1977)
and Taylor (1979, 1985) to enable comparisons to be
made between the floras of Swartboschkloof, the Cape
Hangklip area and Cape Point. The twelve plant families
contributing one per cent or more to the total number
of species at Swartboschkloof are arranged from best to
least represented in Table 2. The family contributing
the highest percentage (Asteraceae) is given the ranked
value of one and the Apiaceae, with the lowest contribu-
tion, the ranked value of 12 in Table 3.
Comparison of the ranking of the families for Swart-
boschkloof, Cape Hangklip and Cape Point (Table 3)
shows that the Asteraceae is best represented, a pheno-
menon documented by Taylor (1979). The Poaceae
make a greater contribution at Swartboschkloof than in
the other two areas. This may be significant but a reason
for it is not ventured. The Restionaceae and Iridaceae
are both moderately well represented at Swartbosch-
kloof and Cape Hangklip whereas at Cape Point the
Iridaceae rank very highly and the Restionaceae are of
lesser significance. Taylor (1985) demonstrates the
better representation of the Iridaceae and Cyperaceae at
Cape Point compared with Cape Hangklip, so it is not
unexpected that this should also be the case when the
ranking of these two families at Cape Point and Swart-
boschkloof is compared. At Cape Hangklip the Ericaceae
is well represented (Boucher 1977) whereas it makes a
smaller contribution at Cape Point and Swartboschkloof.
The Liliaceae, Orchidaceae, Proteaceae, Scrophulariaceae
and Apiaceae show no significant differences in pattern
of occurrence between the three areas in question.
At Swartboschkloof only two genera have 15 species
or more (Table 4) compared with nine at Cape Point and
14 at Cape Hangklip. At the generic level Erica makes
the greatest contribution in all three areas. Further
ranking of genera at Swartboschkloof shows little corre-
lation with species abundance in the listed genera for the
other two areas. Ficinia and Tetraria have relatively low
species occurrence at Swartboschkloof compared with
their occurrence at Cape Hangklip and Cape Point which
substantiates the above-mentioned statement by Taylor
(1985) on the high ranking of Cyperaceae at Cape Point.
Three introduced (alien) Pinus species have been re-
corded at Swartboschkloof namely, Pinus halepensis
Mill., P. pinaster Ait. and P. radiata D. Don, but all in
TABLE 2. — Synopsis of families whose species contribute 1%
or more towards the total number of species, together
with the total number of genera in each family
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
263
TABLE 3. — Ranking of the plant families of Swartboschkloof
(SBK) according to abundance of species in each (^high-
est to 12 = lowest) compared with similar ranking for the
plant families of Cape Point (CP) and Cape Hangklip (HKL)
low numbers. Passiflora sp. (cf. quadrangularis L.) has
been recorded in the forest, due probably to dispersal
into the area by birds. Pittosporum undulatum Vent, has
so far been recorded at only one site in Swartboschkloof
(D.M. Richardson pers. comm.) despite its extensive
spreading in the Jonkershoek Valley through bird dis-
tribution (Richardson & Brink 1985). A number of
stands of Hakea sericea Schrad. have also been located as
well as one individual of Acacia longifolia (Andr.) Willd.;
both species are aggressive invaders. These exotic species
have not been included in the checklist.
CONCLUSIONS
Even though analysis of species diversity is not an
objective of this paper, the analysis of the Swartbosch-
kloof checklist presented here does add to the inventories
of species upon which diversity studies such as that of
Kruger & Taylor (1979) are based. Similarity coefficients
between the floras of the three areas discussed, viz. Cape
Hangklip, Cape Point and Swartboschkloof, have not
been calculated. However, comparison of the respective
floras with each other achieves the objective of placing
the flora of Swartboschkloof into perspective in relation
to the floras of other well studied areas of the Cape
fynbos.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The help of the staff of the Government Herbarium,
Stellenbosch (STE) and the Wicht Herbarium (JF),
TABLE 4. — Genera with ten or more species in descending order
of abundance
Jonkershoek Forestry Research Centre, is gratefully
acknowledged. The Director-General of the Department
of Environment Affairs gave permission to collect plant
specimens at Jonkershoek. The Director of the Botanical
Research Institute is thanked for permission to publish
this work which forms part of a project on Cape Moun-
tain Fynbos.
REFERENCES
BOND, P. & GOLDBLATT, P. 1984. Plants of the Cape Flora —
a descriptive catalogue. Journal of South African Botany
Supplementary Vol. No. 13, pp. 455.
BOUCHER, C. 1977. A provisional checklist of flowering plants
and ferns in the Cape Hangklip area. Journal of South
African Botany 43: 57-80.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E. AND THE STAFF OF THE NATIONAL
HERBARIUM 1984. List of species of southern African
plants. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa
No. 48, pp. 144. Botanical Research Institute, Pretoria.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., REID, C., VAN ROOY, J. & SMOOK,
L. 1985. List of species of southern African plants, edn 2,
part 1, pp. 152. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South
Africa No. 51. Botanical Research Institute, Pretoria.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., WELMAN, W.G., RETIEF, E„ IMMEL-
MAN, K.L., GERMISHUIZEN, G., PIENAAR, B.J., VAN
WYK, M. & NICHOLAS, A. 1987. List of species of south-
ern African plants, edn 2, part 2, pp. 270. Memoirs of the
Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 56. Botanical Re-
search Institute, Pretoria.
KRUGER, F.J. & TAYLOR, H.C. 1979. Plant species diversity
in Cape Fynbos: gamma and delta diversity. Vegetatio
41: 85-93.
LINDER, H.P. 1984. A phylogenetic classification of the genera
of the African Restionaceae. Bothalia 15: 11-76.
LINDER, H.P. 1985. Conspectus of the African species of Restion-
aceae. Bothalia 15: 387-503.
McDONALD, D.J. 1983. The vegetation of Swartboschkloof,
Jonkershoek, Cape Province, South Africa. M.Sc. thesis,
University of Cape Town. Unpublished.
McDONALD, D.J. 1985. The plant communities of Swartbosch-
kloof, Jonkershoek. South African National Scientific
Programmes Report No. 104. CSIR, Pretoria.
McDONALD, D.J. 1988. A synopsis of the plant communities of
Swartboschkloof, Jonkershoek, Cape Province. Bothalia
18: 233-260.
OLIVIER, M.C. 1979. An annotated systematic checklist of the
Angiospermae of the Worcester Veld Reserve. Journal of
South African Botany 45: 49-62.
OLIVIER, M.C. 1983. An annotated systematic checklist of the
Angiospermae of the Cape Receife Nature Reserve, Port
Elizabeth. Journal of South A frican Botany 49: 161-174.
RICHARDSON, D.M. & BRINK, M.P. 1985. Notes on Pittospo-
rum undulatum in the south-western Cape. Veld & Flora
71: 75-77.
STIRTON, C.H. 1986. Notes on the genus Otholobium (Psoraleeae,
Fabaceae). South African Journal of Botany 52: 1-6.
TAYLOR, H.C. 1955. Forest types and floral composition of
Grootvadersbosch. Journal of the South African Forestry
Association 26: 33-46.
TAYLOR, H.C. 1979. Observations on the flora and phytogeo-
graphy of Rooiberg, a dry fynbos mountain in the southern
Cape Province, South Africa .Phytocoenologia 6: 524-531.
TAYLOR, H.C. 1985. An analysis of the flowering plants and
ferns of the Cape of Good Hope Nature Reserve. South
A frican Journal of Botany 51: 1-13.
VAN DER MERWE, P. 1966. Die flora van Swartboskloof, Stel-
lenbosch en die herstel van die soorte na ’n brand. Annale
van die Universiteit van Stellenbosch 41, ser. A, 14: 691-
736.
VANWILGEN, B.W. (ed.) 1986. An outline of proposed research
work at the Swartboschkloof study site. Terrestrial Eco-
systems Section (FRD, CSIR), Occasional Report No. 7.
WERGER, M.J.A., KRUGER, F.J. & TAYLOR, H.C. 1972. A phy-
tosociological study of the Cape fynbos and other vegeta-
tion at Jonkershoek, Stellenbosch. Bothalia 10: 599-614.
264
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
CHECKLIST
The collection numbers of herbarium specimens collected by the senior author (housed in STE) are indicated in parentheses e.g.
(797); numbers in square brackets e.g. [910/2] refer to field herbarium specimens (‘ecoscraps’) housed at the Botanical Research
Unit, Stellenbosch. Cited collections made by other collectors are given in the format: (Van der Merwe, P. 25). Where no voucher
specimens have been collected or elected from existing herbarium specimens, [S.R.] is used to denote ‘site record’. If the source of
information is a publication only, the authors and publication date are quoted in square brackets e.g. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966].
Species marked with an asterisk (*) are those species included in the Braun-Blanquet tables presented by McDonald (1983). Synonyms
are in italics.
PTERIDOPHYTA
LYCO PODIA CEAE
Lycopodium carolinianum L. (Van der Merwe, P. 2024)
OSMUNDACEAE
Todea barbara (L.) T. Moore [951/20]*
SCHIZAEACEAE
Anemia simii Tardieu emend. Alston [910/3]
Mohria caffrorum (L.) Desv. [807/35]*
Schizaea
pectinata (L.) Swartz [S.R.]*
tenella Kaulf. (Kruger, F.J. 1051)
GLEICHENLACEAE
Gleichenia polypodioides (L.) J.E. Sm. (Wicht, C.L. 2)
DENNSTAEDTIACEAE
Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn [S.R.]*
ADIANTACEAE
Cheilanthes contracta Mett. ex Kuhn [938/41]
Pellaea
calomelanos (Swartz) Link [S.R.]*
hastata (L.f.) Link (Wicht, C.L. 454)
pteroides (L.) Prantl [S.R.]*
Pteris dentata Forssk. (Gillett, J.B. 4057)
ASPLENIACEAE
Asplenium
aethiopicum (Bunn, f.) Becherer [944/19]*
adiantum-nigrum L. [960/14]*
Ceterach cordatum (Thunb.) Desv. (Adamson, R.S. 3998)
ASPIDIACEAE
Rumohra adiantiformis (G. Forst.) Ching [S.R.]
BLECHNACEAE
Blechnum
australe L. (Gillett, J.B. 4056)*
capense (L.) Schlechtd. (Adamson, R.S. 4058)
punctulatum Swartz [948/15]*
GYMNOSPERMAE
PODOCARPACEAE
Podocarpus elongatus (Ait.) L'Herit. ex Pers. (Adamson, R.S.
3977)*
CUPRESSACEAE
Widdringtonia nodiflora (L.) Powrie (Van der Merwe, P. 1299)*
ANGIOSPERMAE — MONOCOT YLEDONAE
POACEAE
Imperata cylindrica (L.) Raeuschel [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
Andropogon appendiculatus Nees (Adamson, R.S. 4019)
Cymbopogon marginatus (Steud.) Stapf ex Burtt Davy (Van der
Merwe, P. 2428)*
Hyparrhenia hirta (L.) Stapf [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
Heteropogon contortus (L.) Roem. & Schult. (832)
Themeda triandra Forssk. (Van der Merwe, P. 22-65 & 24-15)*
Pennisetum
clandestinum Chiov. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
macrourum Trim (Van der Merwe, P. 24-1)
thunbergii Kunth (Smith, R.D. 1000)
Ehrharta
bulbosa/.E’. Sm. (Adamson, R.S. 3895)
calycina/.E1. Sm. (Adamson, R.S. 3971)
dura Nees ex Trim (Van Rensburg, W.L.J. 8)*
erecta Lam. [994/22]*
longifolia Schrad. (Van der Merwe, P. 2042)
ottonis Kunth ex Nees [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
ramosa (Thunb.) Thunb. var. aphylla (Schrad.) Gluckman
(Adamson, R.S. 3969)*
setacea Nees ex Trim (Van Rensburg, W.L.J. 215)
Anthoxanthum tongo (Trim) Stapf (Van Rensburg, W.L.J. 190)
Poagrostis pusilla (Nees) Stapf (Van der Merwe, P. 23-95)
Helictotrichon dodii (Stapf) Schweick. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
Merxmuellera
cincta (Nees) Conert [S.R.]*
lupulina (Thunb.) Conert [823/16]*
rufa (Nees) Conert [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
stricta (Schrad.) Conert (Van der Merwe, P. 2071 & 24-59)*
Pentaschistis
ampla (Nees) McClean [853/25]*
aspera (Thunb.) Stapf [886/23]*
malouinensis (Steud.) Clayton (Van der Merwe, P. 2063)
( steudelii (Nees) McClean)*
angustifolia (Nees) Stapf (Van Rensburg, W.L.J. 35)
aristidoides (Thunb.) Stapf [828 /29 ]*
aurea (Steud.) McClean (Van Rensburg, W.L.J. 233)
capensis (Nees) Stapf [ 871/24]*
colorata (Steud.) Stapf [ 887/4]*
curvifolia (Schrad.) Stapf [ 884/31]*
densifolia (Nees) Stapf (Van Rensburg, W.L.J. 42)
pallescens (Schrad.) Stapf (818)
thunbergii (Kunth) Stapf (V an der Merwe, P. 2107)
tortuosa (Trim) Stapf (Van der Merwe, P. 24-62)
Pentameris
macrocalycina (Steud.) Schweick. [846/15]*
thuarii Beauv. (816)
Stipagrostis zeyheri (Nees) De Winter (Kruger, F.J. 1564)
Aristida
canescens Henr. subsp. canescens (Van der Merwe, P. 24-60)
junciformis Trim & Rupr. [S.R.]*
Eragrostis curvula (Schrad.) Nees (Van der Merwe, P. 24-63)
Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
Lasiochloa echinata (Thunb.) Adamson [Van der Merwe, p. 1966]
Plagiochloa
acutiflora (Nees) Adamson & Sprague (Van der Merwe, P. 21 12)
altemans (Nees) Adamson & Sprague (Van der Merwe, P. 2050)
brachystachya (Nees) Adamson & Sprague (Van Rensburg,
W.L.J. 255)
uniolae (L.f.) Adamson & Sprague (Van der Merwe, P. 2049)
var. villosa (Stapf) Adamson [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
Briza maxima L. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
CYPERACEAE
Carpha glomerata (Thunb.) Nees (824)*
Ficinia
bergiana Kunth [940/16]*
deusta (Berg.) Levyns [819/11]*
ecklonea (Steud.) Nees [S.R. ]
fascicularis Nees (Van der Merwe, P. 20-96)
filiformis (Lam.) Schrad. [903/19]*
grandifloraArwoW & Gordon-Gray (Van der Merwe, P. 22-62)*
indica (Lam.) Pfeiffer var. indica [819/11]
monticola Kunth (Van der Merwe, P. 2145)
nigrescens (Schrad.) J. Raynal (799)*
trichodes (Schrad.) Benth. & Hook, f [948/19]*
Scirpus venustulus Boeck. [S.R.]
Isolepis digitata Schrad. (Van der Merwe, P. 23-34)
Tetraria
bromoides (Lam.) Pfeiffer (Borchardt, E.J. J364)*
burmannii (Schrad.) C.B. CL [928/8]*
capillacea (Thunb.) C.B. Cl. [834/29]*
crassa Levyns [824/33]
cuspidata (Rottb.) C.B. Cl. [S.R.]*
265
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
fasciata (Rottb.) C.B. Cl. (638)*
fimbriolata (Nees) C.B. Cl. [S.R.]
flexuosa (Thunb.) C.B. Cl. [S.R.]*
involucrata (Rottb.) C.B. Cl. [932/7]*
picta (Boeck.) C.B. Cl. (Van der Merwe, P. 21-46)
sylvatica (Nees) C.B. G. [S.R.]*
ustulata (L.) C.B. Cl. [924/9]*
Neesenbeckia punctoria (Vahl) Levyns*
Chrysithrix capensis L. var. capensis (Wicht, C.L. J612)
Schoenoxiphium lanceum (Thunb.) Kuekenth. (829) ( Kobresia
lancea (Thunb.) Koyama)*
ARACEAE
Zantedeschia aethiopica (L.) Spreng. [S.R.]*
RESTIONACEAE
Staberoha cernua (L. f.) Dur. & Schinz (Walgate, M.M. 963)*
Ischyrolepis
cincinnata (Mast.) Linder [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
curviramis (Kunth) Linder (Walgate, M.M. 991)
capensis (L.) Linder (802) ( Restio cuspidatus Thunb.)*
gaudichaudiana (Kunth) Linder (Van der Merwe, P. 2147)
( Restio gaudichaudianus Kunth)*
sieberi (Kunth) Linder (637) ( Restio sieberi Kunth)*
subverticillata Steud. (655) ( Restio subverticillatus (Steud.)
Mast.)*
Elegia
asperiflora (Nees) Kunth [S.R.]*
capensis (Burnt, f.) Schelpe (815)*
fistulosa Kunth [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
junceaZ,. (Kruger, E.F. 112)*
neesii Mast. [S.R.]*
racemosa (Poir.) Pers. [Werger et al. 1972]
spathacea Mast. (Van der Merwe, P. 2143)
thyrsifera (Rottb.) Pers. [Werger et al. 1972]*
Chondropetalum
ebracteatum (Kunth) Pillans [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
hookerianum (Mast.) Pillans (Van der Merwe, P. 2092)
mucronatum (Nees) Pillans (Van der Merwe, P. 21-85)
Askidiosperma paniculatum (Mast.) Linder (Van der Merwe, P.
21-76)
Platycaulos depauperatus (Kunth) Linder (Esterhuysen, E. 34607)
( Restio depauperatus Kunth)*
Restio
bifarius Mast. (Van der Merwe, P. 2089)
bifidus Thunb. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
bolusii Pillans (Van der Merwe, P. 2082)
echinatus Kunth [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
filiformis Poir. (656)*
leptostachyus Kunth (833)
multiflorus Spreng. (Walgate, M.M. 980)
perplexus Kunth (Walgate, M.M. 990)*
quadratus Mast. (Walgate, M.M. 995)
sarocladus Mast. (Van der Merwe, P. 2085)
triticeus Rottb. [809/10]*
versatilis Linder [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
Calopsis
esterhuyseniae (Pillans) Linder [S.R.]
membranacea (Pillans) Linder (Van der Merwe, P. 2083) ( Lep -
tocarpus membranaceus Pillans)*
paniculata (Rottb.) Desv. [S.R.] ( Leptocarpus paniculatus
(Rottb.) Mast.)*
rigida (Mast.) Linder [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
viminea (Rottb.) Linder [S.R.]
Thamnochortus
cinereus Linder (Adamson, R.S. 3970)
dichotomus (Rottb.) R. Br. [884/29]*
fruticosus Berg. [804/36]*
gracilis Mast. [904/5]*
lucens (Poir.) Linder (635)
Cannomois virgata (Rottb.) Steud. (Van der Merwe, P. 2074)*
Hypodiscus
albo-aristatus Mast. (Van der Merwe, P. 2086)*
aristatus (Thunb.) Krauss (Van der Merwe, P. 2097)*
willdenowia (Nees) Mast. (Van der Merwe, P. 20101)
Willdenowia sulcata Mast. [946/22]*
JUNCACEAE
Juncus
capensis Thunb. (Van der Merwe, P. 2075)
cephalotes Thunb. (Van Rensburg, W.L.J. 55)
effusus L. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
lomatophyllus Spreng. (Haynes, R.A. 1246)
LILIACEAE
Onixotis punctata (L.) Mabberley (Van der Merwe, P. 22-92)
Wurmbea spicata (Burnt, f.) Dur. & Schinz [Van der Merwe, P.
1966]
Bulbinella triquetra (L. f.) Kunth [S.R.]
Bulbine tuberosa (Mill.) Oberm. [S.R.]
Trachyandra
hirsuta (Thunb.) Kunth [S.R.]
muricata (L. f.) Kunth (Haynes, R.A. 984)
Chlorophytum rigidum Kunth (Kruger, E.F. 100)
Caesia contorta (L. f.) Dur. & Schinz [801/18]*
Aloe mitriformis Mill. (Van der Merwe, P. 25-16)*
Agapanthus africanus (L.) Hoffmg. (Durand, B.J. 2)*
Albuca canadensis (L.) Leighton (795)
Omithogalum hispidum Hornem. subsp. bergii ( Schlechtd .)
Oberm. (Van der Merwe, P. 24-20)
Lachenalia
aloides (L. f.) Hort. ex Aschers. & Graebn. (Durand, B.J. 90)
orchioides (L.) Ait. (Van der Merwe, P. 2354)
Protaspaxagus
compactus (Salter) Oberm. [806/6]*
retrofractus L. (Van Rensburg, W.L.J. s.n.)
rigidus (Jessop) Oberm. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
rubicundus (Berg.) Oberm. (Van Rensburg, W.L.J. 269)*
Myrsiphyllum
asparagoides (L.) Willd. [879/30]*
scandens (Thunb.) Oberm. [916/6]*
HAEMODORACEAE
Dilatris corymbosa Berg. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
Wachendorfia
brachyandra W.F. Barker (Van der Merwe, P.' 22-71)
paniculata Burm. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
AMARYLLIDACEAE
Haemanthus
coccineusL. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
sanguineus Jacq. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
Boophane guttata (L.) Herb. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
Nerine sarniensis (L.) Herb. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
Cyrtanthus ventricosus (Jacq.) Willd. (Kleyn, D. J50)
HYPOXIDACEAE
Empodium plicatum (Thunb.) Garside [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
Spiloxene capensis (L.) Garside [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
TECOPHILAEACEAE
Cyanella hyacinthoides L. (Kruger, E.F. 98)
IRIDACEAE
Romulea
gracillima.B<zfc. (Lewis, G.J. 58956)
rosea (L.) Eckl. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
triflora (Burm. f.) N.E. Br. (Borchardt, E.J. J65)
Moraea
gawleri Spreng. (Lewis, G.J. 58943)
lugubris (Salisb.) Goldbl. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
tripetala (L. f.) Ker-Gawl. (Van der Merwe, P. 22—73)
unguiculata Ker-Gawl. (Durand, B.J. 89)
Bobartia
gladiata (L. f.) Ker-Gawl. [824/35]*
indicaL. [S.R.]*
Aristea
africana (L.) Hoffmg. (787)
major Andr. (Van der Merwe, P. 23—93)*
Geissorhiza
aspera (Berg.) Goldbl. (823)
bolusii Bak. (846)
juncea (Link) A. Dietr. (Lewis, G.J. 58954)
ovata (Burm. f.) Aschers. & Graebn. (Lewis, G.J. 58952)
umbrosa G.J. Lewis (Borchardt, E.J. J 1 19)
Ixia
sp. cf. flexuosa L. (Hubbard, C.S. J129)
maculata L. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
polystachya L. (Haynes, R.A. 870)
var. lutea (Ker-Gawl) G.J. Lewis (Kruger, E.F. 94)
var. polystachya (Wicht, C.L. 55829)
266
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
Tritonia crispa (L. f) Ker-Gawl. (Van der Merwe, P. 24-75)
Chasmanthe aethiopica (L.) N.E. Br. [S.R.]*
Babiana stricta (Ait.) Ker-Gawl. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
Gladiolus
blommesteinii L. BoL [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
cameus Delaroche (793)
debilis Ker-Gawl. var. cochleatus (Sweet) G.J. Lewis (Borchardt,
E.J. J182)
debilis Ker-Gawl var. debilis (Lewis, G.J. J 181)
gracilis Jacq. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
hyalinus Jacq. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
martleyi/,. Bol. (Kruger, E.F. 163)
punctulatus Schrank (Lewis, G.J. s.n.)
Tritoniopsis
dodii (G.J. Lewis) G.J. Lewis (Van Rensburg, W.L.J. 263)
lata (L. Bol) G.J. Lewis (Wicht, C.L. J198)
Anapalina triticea (Burnt, f.) N.E. Br. (Van der Merwe, P. 2170)
Micranthus
alopecuroides (L.) Rothm. (Van der Merwe, P. 24-19)
tubulosus (Burnt.) N.E. Br. (Van der Merwe, P. 24-2)
Thereianthus
lapeyrousioides (Bak.) G.J. Lewis (Van der Merwe, P. 23-94)
spicatus (L.) G.J. Lewis (Van der Merwe, P. 24-43)
Watsonia
angusta Ker-Gawl [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
pyramidata (Andr.) Stapf [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]*
ORCHIDACEAE
Holothrix villosa Lindl (Borchardt, E.J. J233)
Schizodium
bifidum (Thunb.) Reichb. f. (Borchardt, E.J. J241)
obliquum Lindl. (Lewis, G.J. 58941)
Disa
draconis (L. f.) Swartz (Borchardt, E.J. J253)
ferruginea (Thunb.) Swartz (Van der Merwe, P. 1301)
filicornis (L. f.) Thunb. (Borchardt, E.J. J296)
patens (L. f.) Thunb. (Borchardt, E.J. J298)
tenuis Lindl. (Wicht, C.L. J281)
uniflora Berg. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
Disperis
capensis (L.) Swartz (Van der Merwe, P. 25— 51a)
circumflexa (L.) Dur. & Schinz (Wicht, C.L. J286)
villosa (L. f.) Swartz (Wicht, C.L. J288)
Pterygodium
alatum (Thunb.) Swartz (Lewis, G.J. 58939)
catholicum (L.) Swartz (Durand, B.J. 91)
Eulophia litoralis Schltr. (Borchardt, E.J. J312)
ANG 10 SPERM AE — DICOTYLEDONAE
MYRICACEAE
Myrica
humilis Cham. & Schlechtd. (Adamson, R.S. 3986)
serrata Lam. (Van der Merwe, P. 24-24)*
PROTEACEAE
Brabejum stellatifolium L. (Van der Merwe, P. 24-93)*
Serruria kraussii Meisn. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
Mimetes cucullatus (L.) R. Br. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
Protea
acaulos (L.) Reich. [S.R.]*
neriifolia R. Br. [S.R.*]*
nitida Mill (Walters, C.M. 1) [S.R.]*
repens (L.) L. (Van der Merwe, P. 2003)*
Leucospermum
conocarpodendron L. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
grandiflorum (Salisb.) R. Br. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
lineare R. Br. (Van der Merwe, P. 2041)
Leucadendron
salicifolium (Salisb.) I. Williams (Kerfoot, O. 5875)*
salignum Berg. (591)*
spissifolium (Salisb. ex Knight) I. Williams [900/36]*
Aulax pallasia Stapf (Van der Merwe, P. 2017)
VISCACEAE
Viscum
rotundifolium L. f. [802/30]
pauciflorum L. f. [S.R.]*
SANTALACEAE
Thesium
capitatum L. (781)
carinatum DC. (Van der Merwe, P. 21-84)
pseudovirgatum Levyns (Adamson, R.S. 3974)
pycnanthum Schltr. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
scabrum L. (798)
spinulosum DC. (Van der Merwe, P. 24-8)
strictum Berg. (Van der Merwe, P. 23-14)
virgatum Lam. (804)
BALANOPHORACEAE
Mystropetalon thomii Harv. (Haynes, R.A. 1228)
POLYGONACEAE
Rumex cordatus Poir. (Adamson, R.S. 3962)
AIZOACEAE
Phamaceum
dichotomum L. f. (Adamson, R.S. 3976)
incanum L. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
MESEMBRYANTHEMACEAE
Lampranthus
acutifolius (L. Bol) N.E. Br. [949/11]
sp. [S.R.]*
CARYOPHYLLACEAE
Silene undulatazHY. (847)
RANUNCULACEAE
Anemone tenuifolia (L. f.) DC. [S.R.]
Knowltonia
capensis (L.) Huth (Adamson, R.S. 4005)
vesicatoria (L. f.) Sims subsp. vesicatoria (853)*
MENISPERMACEAE
Cissampelos capensis L. f. (Van der Merwe, P. 2451)
LAURACEAE
Cassytha ciliolata Nees [S.R.]*
BRASSICACEAE
Heliophila
coronopifolia L. (Taylor, H.C. 10244)
cuneata Marais (831)
scoparia Burch, ex DC. (Van der Merwe, P. 22-30)
Cardamine africana L. (Adamson, R.S. 4007)*
DROSERACEAE
Drosera
capensis L. (Van der Merwe, P. 2132)
cistiflora L. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
trinervia Spreng. (Walgate, M.M. 966)
CRASSULACEAE
Crassula
capensis (L.) Baill [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
coccineaL. [951/10]*
dejecta Jacq. (Van der Merwe, P. 2066) '
dichotoma L. (Van der Merwe, P. 23-53)
fascicularis Lam. (800)*
flava L. (Kruger, E.F. 93)
nudicaulis L. [957/30]
pellucidaL. [948/5]
pruinosaL. [947/30]*
MONTIN1ACEAE
Montinia caryophyllacea Thunb. (Van der Merwe, P. 22-11)*
CUNONIACEAE
Platylophus trifoliatus (L. f.) D. Don (Borchardt, E.J. J525)
Cunonia capensis L. (Van der Merwe, P. 2065)*
BRUNIACEAE
Nebelia paleacea (Berg.) Sweet (Van der Merwe, P. 2040)*
Pseudobaeckea cordata (Burm. f.) Niedenzu (Kerfoot, O. 5076)
Brunia nodiflora L. (652)*
Berzelia
abrotanoides (L.) Brongn. [900/42]*
267
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
intermedia (Dietr.J Schlechtd. [944/26]*
lanuginosa (L.) Brongn. (Van der Merwe, P. 2046)*
ROSACEAE
Rubus rigidus Sm.
Cliffortia
atrata Weim. (Banks, C.H. J547)
complanata E. Mey. [920/53]
cuneata Ait. (Van der Merwe, P. 844)*
dentata Willd. (651)*
exilifolia Weim. [945/20]*
graminea L. f. (Van der Merwe, P. 24-36)
integerrima Weim. [953/35]
odorata L. f (Van der Merwe, P. 23-05)*
phillipsii Weim. (843)
polygonifolia L. (Bos, J.J. 282)*
var. pubescens Weim. (Van der Merwe, P. 23-06)
var. trifoliata (L.) Harv. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
pterocarpa (Harv.) Weim. [923/20]
ruscifolia L. (Van der Merwe, P. 23—02)*
FABACEAE
Cyclopia
galioides (Berg.) DC. (Floyd, G. J584)
genistoides (L.) R. Br. var. genistoides (Van der Merwe, P. 23-
57)
maculata (Andr.) Kies (Van der Merwe, P. 22-08)
Podalyria
biflora Lam. (Van der Merwe, P. 23—97)
calyptrata Willd. (805)
cuneifolia Vent. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
myrtillifolia Willd (801)
Priestleya
elliptica DC. [873/42]*
stokoei L. BoL (Bos, J.J. 446)
tomentosa (L.) Druce [830/28]
Rafnia
capensis (L.) Druce [S.R.]
perfoliata E. Mey. (Floyd, G. J625)
Aspalathus
araneosa L. (Van der Merwe, P. 22—89)
astroites L. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
cephalotes Thunb. subsp. cephalotes (Van der Merwe, P. 682)
ciharisZ. (775)
cordata (L.) Dahlg. (788)
crenata (L.) Dahlg. (Floyd, G. J614)
divaricata Thunb. (771)
subsp. giacilior Dahlg. (Kruger, F.J. 632)
ericifolia L. subsp. ericifolia (769)
forbesii Harv. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
hispida Thunb. (Van der Merwe, P. 23-83)
laricifolia Berg. (Van der Merwe, P. 2376)
subsp. canescens (L.) Dahlg. (838)
subsp. laricifolia (Kruger, E.F. 41)
parviflora Berg. (Van der Merwe, P. 22-01)
perfoliata (Lam.) Dahlg. (Floyd, G. J614)
retroflexa L. (Floyd, G. J672)
spicata Thunb. (Van der Merwe, P. 22-28)
uniflora Dahlg. subsp. uniflora (Floyd, G. J664)
Argyrolobium
filiforme Eckl. <£ Zeyh. (803)
lanceolatum Eckl & Zeyh. (Borchardt, E.J. J680)
lunaris (L.) Druce [S.R.]
Indigofera
cytisoides Thunb. (Bos, J.J. 1380)
mauritanica (L.) Thunb. (Van der Merwe, P. 2280)*
Psoralea
aculeataZ. (776)*
aphylla L. [902/21]*
monophylla (L.) C.H. Stirton [830/22]*
oligophylla Eckl. & Zeyh. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
pinnataZ. (814)*
Otholobium
fruticans (L.) C.H. Stirton (Van Rensburg, W.L.J. 388) ( Pso-
ralea fruticans (L.) Druce)*
obliquum (E. Mey.) C.H. Stirton (773 & 767) ( Psoralea obliqua
E. Mey.)*
polystictum (Benth. ex Harv.) C.H. Stirton [Van der Merwe, P.
1966]
rotundifolium (L. f.) C.H. Stirton (857) (Psoralea rotundi folia
L. f.)*
spicatum (L.) C.H. Stirton (855 & 111) ( Psoralea spicata L.)*
Tephrosia capensis (Jacq.) Pers. (Kruger, E.F. 1 14)
Bolusafra bituminosa (L.) Kuntze (Van der Merwe, P. 22-84)
Rhynchosia totta (Thunb.) DC. [S.R. ]*
Dipogon lignosus (L.) Verde. [S.R.]*
GERANLACEAE
Pelargonium
cucullatum (L.) L’Herit. (813)
longifolium (Burm. f.) Jacq. (Van der Merwe, P. 24-31)
myrrhifolium (L.) L’Herit. (Durand, B.J. 92)*
var. coriandrifolium (L.) Harv. (808)
papilionaceum (L.) L’Herit. (Van der Merwe, P. 23-59)
patulum Jacq. (809)*
pinnatum (L.) L’Herit. (Van der Merwe, P. 2052)
tabulare (L.) L’Herit. (Durand, B.J. 4)*
vitifolium (L.) L’Herit. (Van der Merwe, P. 23-59)
OXALIDACEAE
Oxalis
bifida Thunb. [S.R.]*
dentata Jacq. (Haynes, R. 940)
incarnata L. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
lanata L. f. (636)*
var. rosea Salter (Walgate, M.M. 969)
purpurea L. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
versicolor L. [S.R.]*
LINACEAE
Linum
africanum L. (836)
quadrifolium L. [804/28]
thunbergii Eckl. & Zeyh. (Van der Merwe, P. 24-11)
RUTACEAE
Agathosma
capensis (L.) Duemmer (Van der Merwe, P. 10-74)*
crenulata (L.) Pillans (Bos, J.J. 276)
juniperifolia Bartl (854 & 665)*
serpyllacea Licht. ex Roem. & Schult. (Kruger, E.F. 45)*
Adenandra
marginata (L. f.) Roem. & Schult. subsp. serpyllacea (Bartl.)
Strid (794)
uniflora (L.) Willd. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
villosa (Berg.) Licht. ex Roem. & Schult. subsp. villosa (Bos,
J.J. 212)
Coleonema juniperinum Sond. (Walgate, M.M. 974)*
Diosma hirsuta Z. (Van der Merwe, P. 23-07)*
POLYGALACEAE
Polygala
bracteolata L. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
garcinii DC. (664)
pappeana Eckl. & Zeyh. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
Muraltia
alba Levyns (Rycroft, H.B. 1212)
alopecuroides (L.) DC. (Kruger, E.F. 97)*
heisteria (L.) DC. (Kruger, E.F. 90)*
macrocera sDC. [861/18]*
pauciflora (Thunb.) DC. (Kruger, F.J. 1009)
EUPHORBIACEAE
Clutia
alaternoides L. (Van der Merwe, P. 21-67)*
var. alaternoides (Wicht, C.L. J886)
var. brevifolia E. Mey. ex Sond. (Adamson, R.S. 3933)
polifolia Jacq. (Van der Merwe, P. 22—26)
polygonoides L. [903/22]*
pterogona Muell. Arg. (Van der Merwe, P. 22-64)
rubicaulis Eckl. ex Sond. (Van Rensburg, W.L.J. 98)*
Euphorbia
erythrina Link (Adamson, R.S. 3957)
genistoides Berg. (807)*
ANACARDIACEAE
Heeria aigentea (Thunb.) Meisn. (Borchardt, E.J. J934)*
Rhus
angustifolia L. (Van der Merwe, P. 25—48)*
rosmarinifolia Vahl (Van der Merwe, P. 22—10)*
tomentosa L. (Van der Merwe, P. 25-45)*
268
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
AQUIFOLIACEAE
Hex mitis (L.) Radik. (Van der Merwe, P. 24-44)*
CELASTRACEAE
Maytenus
acuminata (L. f) Loes. (Bos, J.J. 445)*
oleoides (Lam.) Loes. (864)*
Maurocenia frangularia (L.) Mill. (Kruger, F.J. 1050)
Hartogiella schinoides (Spreng.) Codd (Taylor, H.C. 7302)*
SAPINDACEAE
Dodonaea angustifolia L. f. (Kruger, F.J. 1617)
RHAMNACEAE
Phylica
imberbis Berg. (Kruger, E.F. 107)
pubescens j4*7. [S.R.]*
var. angustifolia Sond. (Bos, J.J. 216)
spicata L. f. (Van Rensburg, W.L.J. 423)*
stipularis L. (Van der Merwe, P. 23-42)
MALVACEAE
Anisodontea scabrosa (L.) Bates (Van der Merwe, P. 22-96)
Hibiscus aethiopicus L. [S.R.]
STERCULIACEAE
Hermannia hyssopifolia L. (Haynes, R.A. 694)
FLACOURTIACEAE
Kiggelaria africana [913/9]*
PENAEACEAE
Penaea mucronata L. (592)*
OLINIACEAE
Olinia ventosa (L.) Cufod. (779)*
THYMELAEACEAE
Gnidia
anomala Meisn. [821/41]*
decurrens Meisn. (Van der Merwe, P. 863)
harveyiana Meisn. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
oppositifolia L. (825)*
Struthiola
ciliata (L.) Lam. (Adamson, R.S. 3964)
subsp. ciliata (789)*
confusa C.H. Wr. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
longiflora Lam. (Lewis, G.J. 58959)
myrsinites Lam. (Van der Merwe, P. 23-23)
Passerina vulgaris Thoday (819)
MYRTACEAE
Metrosideros angustifolia (L.) J.E. Sm. (Van der Merwe, P. 24-
53)
APIACEAE
Centella
calliodus (Cham. & Schlechtd.) Drude [818/8]
eriantha (Rich.) Drude (Adamson, R.S. 3995)*
flexuosa (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Drude (Van Rensburg, W.L.J. 2041)*
glabrata L. (Van der Merwe, P. 21-99)*
Sanicula europaea L. (830)*
Lichtensteinia lacera Cham. & Schlechtd. [S.R.]*
Annesorrhiza capensis Cham. <6 Schlechtd. [Van der Merwe, P.
1966]
Peucedanum
galbaniopse Wolff [931 /IT]
galbanum (L.) Benth. & Hook. f. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
gummiferum (L.) Wijnands [S.R.] (Glia gummifera)*
sieberianum Sond. (839)*
ERICACEAE
Erica
abietina L. (Bos, J.J. 279)
articu laris L. (Kruger, E.F. 152)*
bicolor Thunb. (Smuts, P.L. 126)
caffra L. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
calycina L. (856)*
var. periplociflora (Salisb.) H. Bol. (Smuts, P. L. 1 24)
canescens Wendl. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
cerinthoides L. (Smuts, P.L. 133)*
coccinea L. (Van der Merwe, P. 2051)*
corifolia/,. [933/28]
cristiflora Salisb. (837)
cristata Dulfer (Kruger, F.J. 657)
curviflora /,. (Borchardt, E.J. J 1 146)*
curvirostris Salisb. (662)*
fastigiata L. (Van Rensburg, W.L.J. 360)
hispidula L. (Smuts, P.L. 127)*
longifolia Ait. (Smuts, P.L. 129)*
lucida Salisb. (Borchardt, E.J. J 1 1 82)
lutea Berg. [921/30]
nudiflora/,. (Bos, J.J. 1388)*
parviflora L. (Kruger, E.F. 99)
plukenetii L. (770)*
quadrangularis Salisb. (594)
racemosa Thunb. (653)*
sphaeroidea Dulfer (593)*
thimifolia Wendl. (Bos, J.J. 201)
Blaeria dumosa Wendl. [813/26]*
Eremia totta D. Don (663)*
Sympieza articulata (Thunb.) N.E. Br. [918/23]*
Scyphogyne muscosa (Ait.) Steud. [Werger et al. 1972]
MYRSINACEAE
Myrsine africana L. (Bos, J.J. 448)*
Rapanea melanophloeos (L.) Mez (862)*
EBENACEAE
Diospyros
glabra (L.) De Winter (774)*
whyteana (Hiem) F. White [S.R.]*
OLE ACE AE
Olea
capensis/,. [916/14]
europaea L. subsp. africana (Mill.) P.S. Green [913/5]*
GENTLANACEAE
Sebaea exacoides (L.) Schinz (Durand, B.J. 913)
Chironia baccifera L. (Van der Merwe, P. 24-50)*
Villarsia capensis (Houtt.) Merrill (Van der Merwe, P. 23-32)
ASCLEPIADACEAE
Microloma tenuifolium K. Schum. [955/25]
Asclepias cancellata Burm. f. (Bos, J.J. 1386)
Oncinema lineare (L. f.) Bullock (Kruger, F.J. 1010)
Secamone alpinii Schultes [S.R.]*
CONVOLVULACEAE
Cuscuta nitida E. Mey. ex Choisy [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
LAMLACEAE
Leonotis leonurus (L.) R. Br. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
Salvia
africana-caerulea L. [S.R.]*
chamelaeagnea Berg. [882/11]*
SOLANACEAE
Solan urn
retroflexum Dun. [879/40]*
tomentosum L. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
SCROPHULARIACEAE (Part A)
Nemesia
acuminata Benth. [948/13]*
barbata Benth. (Borchardt, E.J. 537)
macrocarpa (Ait.) Druce [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
Halleria
elliptica Thunb. (Bos, J.J. 213)*
lucida/,. (Bos, J.J. 450)*
Teedia lucida Rudolphi (Neihuizen, K. 1364)
Oftia africana (L.) Bocq. (827)*
Freylinia lanceolata (L. f.) G. Don (Van der Merwe, P. 2059)*
Man u lea
cheiranthus L. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
rubra/,. (Neihuizen, K. 1371)
Sutera linifolia (Thunb.) Kuntze (Van der Merwe, P. 23-19)
Zaluzianskya dentata Walp. (Bos, J.J. 447)
269
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
SELAGINACEAE
Hebenstretia dentata L. (Van der Merwe, P. 23-17)
Selago
corymbosa L. (Van der Merwe, P. 25-05)
quadrangularis Choisy [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
serrata Berg. [829/20]*
spuria L. (772 & 817)*
Agathelpis dubia (L.) Hutch. (Van der Merwe, P. 2074)*
SCROPHULARIACEAE (Part B)
Melasma scabrum Berg. (Van der Merwe, P. 24-48)
Buchnera glabrata Benth. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
Harveya
capensis Hook. (Van der Merwe, P. 2062)
laxiflora Hiem [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
LENTIBULARIACEAE
Utricularia capensis Spreng. (Van der Merwe, P. 24-29)
RUBIACEAE
Anthospermum
aethiopicum L. (Hubbard, C.S. J 1426)*
ciliareL. (Adamson, R.S. 3981)*
Carpacoce vaginellata Salter [809/19]*
Galium
mucroniferum Sond. [829/29]*
subvillosum Sond. var. subvillosum (Adamson, R.S. 3993)
DIPSACACEAE
Scabiosa columbaria L. (Van der Merwe, P. 2056)*
CAMPANULACEAE
Roella ciliata L. (Kruger, E.F. 95)*
Prism atocarpus
diffusus (L. f.) A. DC. (Borchardt, E.J. J1450)*
tenerrimus Buek [945/24]
Wahlenbergia exilis A. DC. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
Lightfootia parvifolia (Berg.) Adamson (Van der Merwe, P. 21-
96)
LOBELIACEAE
Cyphia
bulbosa (L.) Berg. (Durand, B.J. 95)
digitata (Thunb.) Willd. (Van der Merwe, P. 23-62)
volubilis (Thunb.) Willd. (Van der Merwe, P. 22-56)*
Lobelia
coronopifolia L. (Van der Merwe, P. 2005)*
jasionoides (A. DC.) E. Wimm. (Van der Merwe, P. 21-65)
Laurentia
arabidea (Presl) A. DC. (784)*
pygmaea Sond. (Van der Merwe, P. 2053)
ASTERACEAE
Corymbium
africanum L. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
congestum E. Mey. (835)
glabrum L. [867/23]*
scabrum L. [Werger et al. 1972]
villosum Less. [816/26]*
Pteronia
camphorata (L.) L. (Kruger, E.F. Ill)
var. camphorata (797)
Mairea
lasiocarpa DC. (Van der Merwe, P. 2118)
microcephala (Less.) DC. (654)*
taxifolia DC. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
Polyarrhena reflexa (L.) Cass, subsp. reflexa (Kruger, F.J. 1053)*
Conyza
scabridaDC. (Kerfoot, O. 5855)
ulmifolia (Burm. f.) Kuntze [863/6]
Chrysocoma
coma-aurea L. (848)
tenuifolia Berg. (Van der Merwe, P. 23-45)
Brachylaena neriifolia (L.) R. Br. (780)*
Vellereophyton dealbatum (Thunb.) Hilliard & Burtt (Van der
Merwe, P. 25-04)
Plecostachys polifolia (Thunb.) Hilliard & Burtt (852)
Anaxeton
asperum (Thunb.) DC. (Van der Merwe, P. 23-43)
subsp. pauciflorum Lundg. (810)*
Helipterum gnaphaloides (L.) DC. (849)
Helichrysum
asperum (Thunb.) Hilliard & Burtt [903/43]
crispum (L.) D. Don [912/24]*
cymosum (L.) D. Don [958/22]*
felinum Less. [920/56]*
foetidum (L.) Moench (Van der Merwe, P. 2034)
helianthemifolium (L.) D. Don (782)
indicum (L.) Grierson (Kruger, E.F. 101)
litoral eH. Bol. [905/23]*
nudifolium (L.) Less. [S.R.]
odoratissimum (L.) Sweet (783)*
pandurifolium Schrank [816/27] ( auriculatum Less.)*
rutilans (L.) D. Don (Collector unknown J1536)
teretifolium (L.) D. Don [892/32]*
zeyheri Less. [808/26]*
Edmondia pinifolia (Lam.) Hilliard (Van Rensburg, W.L.J. 318)
Stoebe
aethiopica L. (850)
cinerea Thunb. [818/17]*
fusca Thunb. (Bos, J.J. 1359)
plumosa (L.) Thunb. [956/34]*
prostrata L. [943/8]
spiralis Less. (Van der Merwe, P. 2124)*
Elytropappus
glandulosus Less. [958/4]
gnaphaloides (L.) Levyns (Bos, J.J. 209)
rhinocerotis (L. f.) Levyns [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
Metalasia
cephalotes (Thunb.) Druce (812)*
muricata (L.) D. Don (811)*
Leysera gnaphalodes (L.) L. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
Athrixia
crinita (L.) Druce [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
heterophylla (Thunb.) Less. [833/37]*
Heterolepis aliena (L. f.) Druce (851)*
Osmitopsis
afra (L.) Bremer [825/14]*
asteriscoides (Berg.) Less. (826)*
nana Schltr. (845)
Oedera (=Eroeda)
imbricata (Lam.) Levyns (821)*
prolifera Lam. (= capensis) [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
Athanasia
crithmifolia L. (Van der Merwe, P. 24-30)
dimorphaDC. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
trifurcata L. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
Cenia turbinata (L.) Pers. (806)
Hippia pilosa (Berg.) Druce (Van der Merwe, P. 23-33)*
Artemisia afra Jacq. ex Willd. [864/2]
Cineraria tomentosa Less. (Van der Merwe, P. 22-36)
Senecio
bipinnatus (L. f.) Less. (Van der Merwe, P. 2068)
burchellii DC. (Van der Merwe, P. 22—05)
consanguineus DC. (Kerfoot, O. 6061)
cymbalarifolius (L.) Less. [ S. R. ]*
erubescens Az'f. (Van der Merwe, P. s.n.)
grandiflorus Berg. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
hastifohus (L. f.) Less. (Van der Merwe, P. 23-87)
paniculatus Berg. (Kruger, E.F. 96)
pinifolius (L.) Lam. [Werger et al. 1972]
pinnulatus Thunb. (Van der Merwe, P. 24-85)
sp. cf. pubigerus L. (Van der Merwe, P. 2197)
purpureus L. (Van der Merwe, P. 23-82)
rigidus L. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
umbellatus L. (840)*
Euryops
abrotanifolius (L.) DC. (Van der Merwe, P. 22-51)*
rupestris Schltr. (Van der Merwe, P. 21—77)
var. rupestris (881)
Othonna
amplexifolia DC. (Van der Merwe, P. 22-42)
heterophylla L. f. (Bos, J.J. 225)
origens (L.) Levyns (Van Rensburg, W.L.J. 2123)
quinquedentata Thunb. (Van Rensburg, W.L.J. 2089)
sonchifolia DC. (Wicht, C.L. 1647)
Castalis
nudicaulis (L.) T. Norl. [898/26]*
270
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
var. nudicaulis (Van der Merwe, P. 23-38)
Osteospermum
ciliatum Berg. (820)*
junceum Berg. (790)*
spinosum L. [Van der Merwe, P. 1966]
tomentosum (L. f.) T. Norl.. [869/36]*
Gibbaria ilicifolia (L.j T. NorL (Kerfoot, O. 6204)
Chrysanthemoides monilifera (L.) T. Norl. (Kerfoot, O. 5378)
Ursinia
anthemoides (L.j Poir. subsp. anthemoides (792)
caledonica (Phill.) Prassler (Van der Merwe, P. 2141)
crithmoides (Berg.) Poir. (791)*
dentata (L.) Poir. [944/35 ]
nana DC. (Collector unknown J 1673)
pinnata (Thunb.) Prassler (796)*
Arctotis
angustifolia L. (Van der Merwe, P. 20-57)
semipapposa (DC.) Lewin (Kruger, E.F. 110)*
Haplocarpha lanata (Thunb.) Less. (650)*
Gazania serrata DC. (Collector unknown J 1691)*
Cullumia
ciliaris (L.) R. Br. (Van der Merwe, P. 22-43)
setosa (L.) R. Br. [894/15]*
Berkheya
armata (Vahl) Druce (Van der Merwe, P. 25—41)
herbacea (L. f.) Druce [885/10]*
Oldenburgia intermedia Bond (Van Rensburg, W.L.J. 327)
Gerbera crocea (L.) Kuntze [937/9]*
Bothalia 18,2: 271-277 (1988)
Threatened plants of the eastern Cape: a synthesis of collection records
D.A. EVERARD*
Keywords: conservation, eastern Cape, endangered, endemic, rare
ABSTRACT
A preliminary list of endemic and possibly threatened plant taxa was compiled for the eastern Cape from various
sources. The list was checked against herbarium specimens in the Albany Museum (GRA) and the Rhodes Uni-
versity (RUH) herbaria for information on past collections and a data record card compiled for each specimen.
Each taxon was assigned a conservation status category. These data were then entered into a computer based
data bank which facilitates efficient storage and rapid search and retrieval of information such as distribution,
vegetation type, etc. The data bank contains records of 774 plant taxa in the following conservation status cate-
gories: one recently extinct (X), three endangered (E), 16 vulnerable (V), 41 rare (R), 117 indeterminate but in
one of the former categories (I), 484 uncertain whether safe or not (U) and 112 safe endemics (e). Ninety-three
of the taxa in the X, E, V, R, I and U categories are also endemic giving the eastern Cape a total of 205 endemic
plant taxa. The distributions of these threatened taxa are examined and the threats to them discussed. A pro-
gramme to monitor the threatened taxa and investigate the large numbers of I and U cases in the field is suggest-
ed and methods of their conservation discussed.
UITTREKSEL
’n Voorlopige lys van endemiese en moontlik bedreigde planttaksons is uit verskeie bronne vir die Oos-Kaap
saamgestel. Vir inligting oor vorige versamelings is die lys vergelyk met herbariumeksemplare in die herbariums
van die Albanie Museum (GRA) en die Rhodes Universiteit (RUH) en ’n kaart met toepaslike data is vir elke
eksemplaar opgesteL ’n Bewaringstatuskategorie is aan elke takson toegeken. Hierdie data is vervolgens in ’n reke-
naardatabank ingevoer wat doeltreffende berging en vinnige soek en herwinning van inligting soos verspreiding,
plantegroeitipe ens., vergemaklik. Die databank bevat gegewens van 774 planttaksons in die volgende bewaring-
statuskategoriee: een onlangs uitgesterf (X), drie bedreig (E), 16 kwesbaar (V), 41 seldsaam (R), 117 onbeslis
maar in een van die vorige kategoriee (I), 484 onseker of dit veilig is of nie (U) en 112 veilige endemiese taksons
(e). Drie-en-neentig van die taksons in die X-, E-, V-, R-, I- en U-kategoriee is ook endemies en dit gee aan die
Oos-Kaap ’n totaal van 205 endemiese planttaksons. Die verspreidings van hierdie bedreigde taksons word onder-
soek en die bedreigings waaraan hulle onderhewig is, word bespreek. ’n Program om die bedreigde taksons te
monitor en die groot getalle I- en U-gevalle in die veld te ondersoek, word aan die hand gedoen en metodes vir
hul bewaring word bespreek.
INTRODUCTION
In 1980 Hall et al. published a preliminary list of
threatened plant species in South Africa and neighbour-
ing territories, which lists 1 915 vascular plant taxa. In-
tensive studies of threatened plants (McCoy 1981; Day
1983) and their habitats (Cholewa & Henderson 1984;
Foxx & Tierney 1980; Milewski 1977, 1978a &b; Wright
1983) have given an insight into the strategies needed
for threatened plant conservation, but in southern Africa
these studies have been concentrated in specific regions
and it was felt that surveys are necessary on a wide scale
and in all regions (Hall et al. 1980). A study was there-
fore implemented to analyse, update and extend the work
carried out by Hall et al. (1980) with the aim of gaining
a clearer picture of the conservation status of the vege-
tation and the threat to and pressure on rare plant spe-
cies in the eastern Cape. This paper gives the results of
that part of the project (Everard 1985) devoted to the
threatened plant taxa of the eastern Cape. Some results
and conclusions dealing more specifically with conser-
vation were presented in a previous paper (Lubke et al.
1986).
* Department of Plant Sciences, Rhodes University, Grahamstown
6140. Present address: Botany School, Downing Street, Cam-
bridge CB2 3EA, England.
M.S. received: 1986.04.16.
STUDY AREA
The boundaries of the eastern Cape have been defined
as the area south of 31°S and between 24° E and 29° E,
relating approximately to the natural boundries of the
Sneeuberg-Winterberg-Stormberg escarpment in the
north, the Great Kei River in the east and the Krom-
Gamtoos Rivers in the west (Figure 1), (Gibbs Russell
& Robinson 1981; Cowling 1983). This area overlaps
that of Hall & Veldhuis (1985) which extends to the 26° E
line of longitude but which was based on preliminary
data for the overlapping zone.
This region has long been known as a region of im-
mense transition and complexity (Rennie 1945 ; Cowling
1983; Lubke et al. 1986). It forms a major climatic,
topographic and geological transition zone and is con-
sequently a focus of convergence for four phytochoria
(Goldblatt 1978; Werger 1978; Werger & Coetzee 1978;
Gibbs Russell & Robinson 1981; White 1983; Cowling
1983; and Lubke et al. 1986). It is therefore an area
rich in species and communities and probably provides
the greatest biological diversity of any equivalent region
in South Africa (Bruton & Gess In press).
METHODS
A preliminary list of rare, endangered and endemic
plant taxa in the eastern Cape, was established (cf. Lubke
272
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
FIGURE 1. — The regional limits
of the eastern Cape showing
the four rainfall subregions:
SU.M.R., summer maxi-
mum rainfall; A.M.R., au-
tumn maximum rainfall;
S.M.R., spring maximum
rainfall and W.M.R., win-
ter maximum rainfall.
et al. 1986), and these data were written onto index
cards. This card-index data bank proved to be too large
and cumbersome for effective extraction of information.
A number of authors (Hall 1972a & b, 1974; Crovello
1976; Morris & Glen 1978; and Magill et al. 1983)
have suggested computer based systems as a more effi-
cient method. Hall (1981) points out that although
tempting, it is unnecessary to load data banks with all
available information as they become too vast for effi-
cient maintainance and updating. This fact has been
substantiated by Magill et al. (1983) with respect to the
PRECIS data bank of the Botanical Research Institute.
Computer-based data banks are most effective when
functioning as a cross-indexing system with only essen-
tial information backing up a larger paper-based data
bank. It was therefore decided to adapt a filing pro-
gramme for use on an Apple II microcomputer. PFS
(Personal Filing System), a programme for use on an
Apple or equivalent microcomputer, proved to be ideal.
Information is stored on a ‘form’ designed on the screen
especially for the particular requirements of the project
(Figures 2 & 3). This information can be quickly retriev-
ed by searching on any of the stored information and
printed out or displayed on the screen. By using PF;.
Report, an associated programme, information can be
summarized into table form, with only the information
required being printed out as a report (Figure 4). Data
are stored on diskettes, each diskette storing approxi-
mately 1 000 forms. The chief limitations of the PFS
system are the number of columns available for input-
ting data and the format of the output. One is restrict-
ed to only 40 columns per line when entering data
(Figure 3), and printed reports are restricted to 80
columns per line which restricts the number of headings
per report (Figure 4). The advantages of the system are
1, its simplicity of use; 2, its adaptiveness to particular
requirements; and 3, its rapid search and retrieval of
required information.
RESULTS
The data bank contains records of 774 plant taxa in
the following conservation status categories. One taxon
appears to be recently extinct (X); three endangered
(E); 16 vulnerable (V); 14 rare (R) (see Appendix);
117 indeterminate (I) and 484 taxa are recorded as be-
ing uncertain whether safe or not (U). This gives a total
of 662 threatened taxa in the eastern Cape. In addition
to the threatened taxa the data bank contains records of
112 endemic taxa which do not appear to be in any sort
of hazard. A total of 662 threatened taxa for the eastern
Cape which is 627 more taxa than the 147 taxa listed
by Hall et al. (1980), appears to be alarmingly high,
however 91% of the threatened taxa fall into either the
U category (73%) or the I category (18%). These high
numbers of I and U cases emphasize the preliminary
nature of this information, and the urgent need to in-
vestigate most of these plant taxa in the field.
FIGURE 2. — A blank form designed on the computer screen
into which information is entered for storage.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
273
FIGURE 3. — A completed form showing stored information.
A taxonomic analysis of the more threatened families
shows predictably, that the larger families have the
greatest number of threatened species. The most serious-
ly threatened family is the Zamiaceae (Cycads) where,
of the 12 species that occur in the eastern Cape, five of
which are endemic and generally have very small distri-
bution ranges, all are threatened in some way. Other
families with relatively high proportions of their species
in a threatened state include Euphorbiaceae, Orchidaceae,
Crassulaceae, Proteaceae and Geraniaceae.
Owing to a low collecting intensity from many parts
of the eastern Cape, a lack of recent collections, and the
unreliable locality records of many of the older collec-
tions, it was not possible to plot distribution maps or to
list threatened species in each quarter degree area. Field
investigations are planned to supplement the existing
information. The distribution of threatened taxa within
vegetation types and the distribution of threatened taxa
within nature reserves have been discussed by Lubke et
al. (1986) and will not be repeated here. It should how-
ever be noted that checklists were only available for 10
of the 90 reserves. This low number of checklists is in-
dicative of the lack of knowledge and information avail-
able on the eastern Cape flora.
DISCUSSION
Collecting intensity
The list of threatened taxa should be regarded as a
preliminary list of all the species that are possibly threat-
ened in the eastern Cape. The large number of Uncertain
(U) and Indeterminate (I) cases reflect a paucity of data
on the eastern Cape flora. Collecting intensities of her-
barium specimens appear to be relatively high only in
some parts of the eastern Cape (Gibbs Russell et al.
1984). Fourteen of the quarter degree areas have no
collection records. Effective conservation legislation
and the optimum siting of future reserves depends part-
ly upon adequate up-to-date information on threatened
species, especially as pressures on vegetation increase. A
long term method of monitoring these species must
therefore be formulated.
Monitoring programmes
For the long-term monitoring of threatened species a
field dossier should be made for each rare, vulnerable
and endangered species based on the system as described
by Hall et al. (1980). This file should hold notes, maps
and an A4-sized data card that can be taken into the
field in a transparent folder. The card should carry an
illustration of the plant, a description, notes for dis-
tinguishing similar species and statements on ecology,
localities and dates of former collections. Field surveys
FIGURE 4. — A report generated
by P.F.S. Report. All the
threatened plant records
from grid reference 3426BC
are shown together with
their status and the vege-
tation type in which they
were collected.
274
of threatened plants would be aided by this data card
and should follow a standard checklist of items to be
examined. Taylor & Edwards (1972) point out that if we
are to succeed in conserving these species, standardized
data will have to be sent to a central co-ordinating authori-
ty which will compile and distribute the information.
Henifin et al. (1981) developed a detailed checklist from
which Hall et al. (1980) adapted one for use in the west-
ern Cape survey. This standard checklist should be used
to standardize information obtained in field surveys in
the eastern Cape.
Rates of extinction must also be monitored, but at
present we are aware of only one case, that of Gladiolus
alatus L. var. algoensis Herb., which was last recorded
over a hundred years ago. Hall et al. (1980) indicate that
extinction rates may have increased during the past 200
years although this finding has been strongly affected by
periodically varying collecting intensities.
Threat factors
No studies have been carried out to show which or
even how many species are threatened by the various
threat factors in the eastern Cape. There are three major
forms of threat on natural habitats in this region. They
are direct human impacts, indirect human impacts and
natural pressures.
Direct human impact
(i) Agriculture: in the eastern Cape agriculture appears
to be affecting the flora most seriously. Bad grazing
methods have been responsible for the reduction of
cover in all the vegetation types and have reached alarm-
ing proportions in the more arid areas of the eastern
Cape. Many species have been eliminated, species com-
position has changed and loss of soil has occurred in
large areas of the eastern Cape owing to overgrazing
(A.J. Aucamp pers. comm.). Aucamp also estimates that
approximately 150000 ha of thicket in the Uitenhage
District is so badly overgrazed that it will never recover.
Overgrazing is possibly the major threat to eastern Cape
flora.
Bush-clearing for crop cultivation has also been re-
sponsible for major reductions in certain species, espe-
cially in the higher rainfall areas of the eastern Cape. The
Department of Agriculture and Water Supply (A.J.
Aucamp pers. comm.) have found that ill-planned bush-
clearing can cause up to nearly 35 tonnes of soil to be
lost per ha per year. The natural rate of soil regeneration
is only approximately 1 tonne per ha per year.
Although burning is a useful tool in veld management
(Trollope 1973, 1974), the frequency of fires is critical.
Excessive and uncontrolled burning, especially in the
Fynbos and the Grassland veld types, can lead to unde-
sirable changes in species composition.
(ii) Development of urban areas for industry and resi-
dential purposes is also responsible for increased pres-
sure on plant communities. Some important and species-
rich communities notably in the East London (Potters
Pass) and Port Elizabeth areas (Swartkops region) are
being directly threatened. Road building, mining and
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
quarrying are minor threats to vegetation in the eastern
Cape. However, care should be taken to minimize their
impact on the surrounding vegetation. Exploitation such
as flower picking, wood collecting and plant collecting
(for horticultural purposes) is having devastating effects
on certain species. Cycads ( Encephalartos spp.) are in-
discriminately collected by many people in spite of
restrictions, and in certain areas (e.g. the national road
through the Fish River Valley) are sold to passing motor-
ists. Other species that are threatened by collectors in-
clude many of the Liliaceae, Orchidaceae and succulents
such as some Euphorbia species (e.g. Euphorbia obesa
Hook, f.) and species of the Mesembryanthemaceae
(Everard 1985).
Indirect human impact
Indirect human impacts include pressures from alien
plant invasion, erosion and possibly pollution.
(i) Alien plant invasion: the exotic plant species which
menace natural vegetation in the eastern Cape include
four Australian acacias: Acacia cyclops A. Cunn. ex
G. Don, A. longifolia (Andr.) Willd., A. mearnsii De Wild,
and A. saligna (Labill.) Wendl. (Stirton 1978); Pinus
pinaster Ait. (Jacot Guillarmod 1980); Hakea sericea
Schrad. (Jacot Guillarmod in press); three species of
cacti — Opuntia aurantiaca Lindl., O. ficus-indica (L.)
Mill, and O. imbricata (Haw.) DC, (Schonland 1924);
nassella tussock — Stipa trichotoma Nees (Steinke
1965); water hyacinth — Eichhomia crassipes (Mart.)
Solms-Laub. (Jacot Guillarmod 1979); water fern —
Azolla filiculoides Lam. (Jacot Guillarmod in press) and
Sesbania punicea (Cav.) Benth. (Pienaar 1977). There are
several other exotic species present in the eastern Cape
that are not yet fully invasive but are threats. Among
these are Lantana camara L., Solanum mauritianum
Scop., Salvinia molesta Mitchell and possibly some
Eucalyptus species. Many rare indigenous species are
threatened by these spreading exotics, a good example
being Oldenburgia arbuscula DC. which is threatened
by spreading Pinus pinaster, Hakea sericea, Acacia
mearnsii and A. longifolia.
(ii) Erosion, especially in areas where grazing pressures
have been heavy, is also a threat to the natural vegeta-
tion. Sheet erosion in the Karoo areas with the asso-
ciated loss of topsoil and the exposure of roots of
many woody species is causing a reduction in the num-
ber of woody species in these areas (B. Hobson pers.
comm.). Areas of the Ciskei are also very badly affected
where topsoil loss has led to a deterioration in grasslands
and other veld types (pers. obs.).
(iii) Pollution is a threat to aquatic and some other habi-
tats. The extent of this threat is not clear at this stage;
however there is a danger that the situation could dete-
riorate rapidly especially in habitats close to urban areas,
e.g. Swartkops Estuary near Port Elizabeth.
Natural pressures
Natural threats which include pathogens, natural fires
and genetic factors, may only become a real threat when
populations have been drastically reduced in size. Studies
to show the chief patterns of threat factors have been
275
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
conducted for taxa in various areas in the western Cape
(Hall & Veldhuis 1985), however their impact on taxa in
the eastern Cape will only become clear when the threat-
ened plants are investigated and monitored in the field.
Conservation
The International Convention on International Trade
in Endangered Species of Wild Animals and Plants
(CITES) which is administered by the IUCN states that
‘wild fauna and flora, in their many beautiful and varied
forms, are an irreplaceable part of the natural systems of
the earth which must be protected for this and the gene-
rations to come’ (Anon. 1973). Lucas (1976) points out
that the ever-growing value of wild fauna and flora from
aesthetic, scientific, cultural, recreational and economic
points of view is being noted by many countries. Hall &
Veldhuis (1985) present many convincing reasons for
conserving rare species and hence maintaining natural
diversity. They also discuss conservation strategies in
detail. They note that re-establishing populations at new
sites or holding small samples of their natural popula-
tions in botanical gardens should be last-resort actions
as plants are often put under many adverse pressures
such as alien selection forces and hybridization in these
situations. Seed banks for storing seeds are also a useful
method of saving species from extinction, although
many factors such as gene pool sizes need to be consider-
ed when establishing seed banks. The best insurance
against extinction is the conservation of natural habitats
(Raven 1976; Hall et al. 1980). With the present land
use requirements many of these habitats will have to be
conserved in the form of sanctuaries or conservation
areas. This may not be ideal but appears to be the only
remaining practical option for conserving many species.
When planning these sanctuaries many authors (Mac-
Arthur & Wilson 1963; Diamond 1975; Diamond &
May 1976; Game 1980; Gilpin & Diamond 1980;
Poynton & Roberts 1985) advocate that island biogeo-
graphical theory should be incorporated into the geo-
metric design of the boundaries. Despite the occasional
dissenters (Simberloff & Abele 1975) who feel that the
application of the theory to conservation practice is pre-
mature, the overwhelming consensus is that the theory’s
tenets need to be considered in the context of reserve
planning. It has generally been proposed that reserves
should be large, clumped, roundish and connected by
corridors. Such recommendations are usually based on
the notion that any geometrical consideration that in-
creases immigration rates and/or decreases extinction
rates or minimizes the perimeter to area ratio is useful.
CONCLUSIONS
Preliminary investigations show that there are 662
threatened vascular plant taxa in the eastern Cape. Nine-
ty-one percent of these fall into the I and U categories
which is indicative of the lack of information and recent
collection records available on the eastern Cape flora.
In order to clarify most of these cases and to gain more
information on the nature and severity of the various
threat factors, a long-term and ongoing monitoring pro-
gramme needs to be initiated. This programme should
follow the guidelines reported by Hall et al. (1980). The
ultimate success in conserving most of the threatened
taxa lies in the conservation of viable habitats from
which the threat factors have been eliminated. Research
is required to identify suitable habitats, understand
essential processes and formulate management schemes
if many of these taxa are going to be saved from extinc-
tion.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Shirley Jackson and student assistants are thanked for
preparing the initial list of threatened taxa and for much
of the herbarium work. The staff of the Albany Herbarium
are thanked for co-operation and assistance. Prof. R.A.
Lubke is thanked for supervision during the study and
for comments on a draft of this paper. Michelle Everard
is warmly thanked for her help in the preparation of this
paper. This study was supported financially by the Nature
Conservation Research Section of the National Program-
me for Ecosystem Research.
REFERENCES
ANONYMOUS 1973. Convention on international trade in en-
dangered species of wild fauna and flora. Special Supple-
ment IUCN Bulletin 4: 1-12.
BRUTON, M.N. & GESS, F.W. in press. Towards an environ-
mental plan for the eastern Cape. Proceedings of a Sym-
posium, Grahamstown, Rhodes University.
CHOLEWA, A.F. & HENDERSON, D.M. 1984. A survey and
assessment of the rare vascular plants of the Idaho Natio-
nal Engineering Laboratory Site. Great Basin Naturalist
44: 140-144.
COWLING, R.M. 1983. Phytochorology and vegetation history
in the south-eastern Cape, South Africa. Journal of Bio-
geography 10: 393-419.
CROVELLO, T.J. 1976. Computers as an aid to solving endanger-
ed species problems. In G.T. Prance, The status of endang-
ered plant species and environments in the western hemis-
phere. New York Botanical Garden.
DAY, R.T. 1983. A survey and census of the endangered Furbish
lousewort, Pedicularis furbishiae, in New Brunswick. Cana-
dian Field Naturalist 97: 325-327.
DIAMOND, J.M. 1975. The island dilemma: lessons of modem
biogeographic studies for the design of natural reserves.
Biological Conservation 7: 129-146.
DIAMOND, J.M. & MAY, R.M. 1976. Island biography and the
design of natural reserves. In R.M. May, Theoretical eco-
logy. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
EVERARD, D.A. 1985. The conservation status of some unique
plant communities in the eastern Cape. M.Sc thesis, Rhodes
University, Grahamstown.
FOXX, T.S. & TIERNEY, G.D. 1980. Status of the flora of the
Los Alamos National Environmental Research Park. Los
Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico.
GAME, M. 1980. Best shape for nature reserves. Nature 287:
630-631.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., RETIEF, E. & SMOOK, L. 1984. Inten-
sity of plant collecting in southern Africa. Bothalia 15:
131-138.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E. & ROBINSON, E.R. 1981. Phytogeo-
graphy and speciation in the vegetation of the eastern Cape.
Bothalia 13: 467-472.
GILPIN, M.E. & DIAMOND, J.M. 1980. Subdivisions of nature
reserves and the maintenance of species diversity. Nature
285: 567-569.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1978. An analysis of the flora of southern Afri-
ca; its characteristics, relationships and origins. Annals of
the Missouri Botanical Garden 65: 369-436.
HALL, A.V. 1972a Computer based data banking for taxonomic
collections. Taxon 21: 13-25.
HALL, A.V. 1972b. The use of a data banking system for taxon-
omic collections. Contribution from the Bolus Herbarium
5: 1-7.
HALL, A.V. 1974. Museum specimen record data storage and re-
trieval. Taxon 23: 23-28.
276
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
HALL, A.V. 1981. Information handling for southern Africa’s
rare and endangered species survey. In L.E. Morse & M.S.
Henifln, Rare plant conservation: geographical data or-
ganization: 167-184. The New York Botanical Garden,
Bronx, New York.
HALL, A.V., DE WINTER, M., DE WINTER, B. & VAN OOS-
TERHOUT, S.A.M. 1980. Threatened plants of southern
Africa. South African National Scientific Programmes
Report No. 45.
HALL, A.V. & VELDHUIS, H.A. 1985. South African Red Data
Book: plants — fynbos and karoo biomes. South African
National Scientific Programmes Report No. 45.
HENIFIN, M.S., MORSE, L.E., REVEAL, J.L, MACBRYDE, B.
& LAWYER, J.I. 1981. Guidelines for the preparation of
status reports on rare or endangered plant species. In L.E.
Morse & M.S. Henifin, Rare plant conservation: geographi-
cal data organization. The New York Botanical Garden,
Bronx, New York.
JACOT GUILLARMOD, A. 1979. Water weeds in southern Afri-
ca. Aquatic Botany 6: 377-391.
JACOT GUILLARMOD, A. 1980. Exotic weeds and macchia
vegetation in the eastern Cape. Eastern Cape Naturalist
69: 21-23.
JACOT GUILLARMOD, A. in press. Exotic plant invasion, man’s
activities and indigenous vegetation. In M.N. Bruton &
F.W. Gess, Towards an environmental plan for the eastern
Cape. Grahamstown, Rhodes University.
LUBKE, R.A., EVERARD, D.A. & JACKSON, S. 1986. The
biomes of the eastern Cape with emphasis on their con-
servation. Bothalia 16: 251-261.
LUCAS, G.L. 1976. Conservation: recent developments in inter-
national co-operation and legislation. In J.B. Simmons et
al.. Conservation of threatened plants: 271-303. Plenum
Press, New York.
MACARTHUR, R.H. & WILSON, E.O. 1963. An equilibrium
theory of insular zoogeography. International Journal of
Organic Evolution 17: 373-387.
MAGILL, R.E., GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., MORRIS, J.W. & GON-
SALVES, P. 1983. PRECIS, the Botanical Research Insti-
tute herbarium data bank. Bothalia 14: 481-495.
MCCOY, E.D. 1981. Rare, threatened and endangered plant
species of south-west Florida and potential O.S.C. activity
impacts. Biological Services Program, Florida.
MILEWSKI, A.V. 1977. Habitat of Restionaceae endemic to west-
ern Cape coastal flats. Journal of South African Botany
43: 233-241.
MILEWSKI, A.V. 1978a. Habitat of threatened Proteaceae ende-
mic to western Cape coastal flats. Journal of South Afri-
can Botany 44: 55-65.
MILEWSKI, A.V. 1978b. Habitat of threatened species of Ser-
ruria and Protea endemic to western Cape coastal flats.
Journal of South African Botany 44: 363-371.
MORRIS, J.W. & GLEN, H.F. 1978. PRECIS, the National Her-
barium of South Africa (PRE) computerized information
system. Taxon 27: 449-462.
PIENAAR, K. 1977. Sesbania punicea (Cav.) Benth., the hand-
some plant terrorist. Veld & Flora 63: 17-18.
POYNTON, J.C. & ROBERTS, D.C. 1985. Urban open space
planning in South Africa: a biogeographical perspective.
South African Journal of Science 81: 33-37.
RAVEN, P.H. 1976. Ethics and attitudes. In J.B. Simmons et
al., Conservation of threatened plants: 155-179. Plenum
Press, New York.
RENNIE, J.V.L. 1945. The Eastern Province as a geographical
region. South African Geographical Journal 27: 1-27.
SCHONLAND, S. 1924. The jointed cactus. Journal of the De-
partment of Agriculture 4: 2-12.
SIMBERLOFF, D.S. & ABELE, L.G. 1975. Island biogeogra-
phy theory and conservation practice. Science 191: 285-
286.
STEINKE, T.D. 1965. Nassella tussock grass — dangerous new
weed. Farming in South Africa 41: 9—11.
STIRTON, C.H. (ed.) 1978. Plant invaders — beautiful but danger-
ous. Cape Provincial Department of Nature and Environ-
mental Conservation.
TAYLOR, H.C. & EDWARDS, D. 1972. A proposed inventory
of the conservation status of threatened South African
plant species. Unpublished.
TROLLOPE, W.S.W. 1973. Fire as a method of controlling mac-
chia (Fynbos) vegetation in the Amatola Mountains of
the eastern Cape. Proceedings of the Grassland Society of
southern Africa 8: 35-41.
TROLLOPE, W.S.W. 1974. Role of fire in preventing bush en-
croachment in the eastern Cape. Proceedings of the Grass-
land Society of southern Africa 9: 67-72.
WERGER, M.J.A. 1978. Biogeographical divisions of southern
Africa. In M.J.A. Werger, Biogeography and ecology of
southern Africa. Junk, The Hague.
WERGER, M.J.A. & COETZEE, B.J. 1978. The Sudano-Zambe-
zian Region. In M.J.A. Werger, Biogeography and ecology
of southern Africa: 301-462. Junk, The Hague.
WHITE, F. (ed.) 1983. Vegetation of Africa. UNESCO/AETFAT/
UNSO, Paris.
WRIGHT, A.E. 1983. Conservation status of the Three Kings Is-
lands endemic flora in 1982. Record of the Auckland In-
stitute and Museum 20: 175-184.
APPENDIX
List of recently extinct, endangered, vulnerable and rare plant taxa of the eastern Cape. * Taxa endemic to the eastern Cape
Recently extinct
Gladiolus alatus L. var. algoensis Herb.
Endangered
Encephalartos latifrons Lehm. *
Herschelia lugens (H. BoL) Kraenzl var. nigrescens Linder
Euphorbia obesa Hook. f. *
Vulnerable
Encephalartos
arenarius R.A. Dyer*
caffer (Thunb.) Lehm.
cycadifolius (Jacq.) Lehm.
horridus (Jacq.j Lehm.*
longifolius (Jacq.) Lehm.
princeps R.A. Dyer
trispinosus (Hook.) R.A. Dyer*
Marsilea schelpeana Launert
Cyperus brevis Boeck.
Aloe reynoldsii Letty
Kniphofia rooperi (Moore) Lem.
Cyrtanthus staadensis Schonl.
Dierama pulcherrimum (Hook, f ) Bak.
Eulophia platypetala Lindl.
Arundinaria tessellata (Nees) Munro
Helichrysum recurvatum (L. f. ) Thunb.
Rare
Encephalartos
altensteinii Lehm.
friderici-guilielmi Lehm.
lehmannii Lehm.
villosus Lehm.
Cyathea dregei Kunze
Kniphofia praecox Bak. subsp. bruceae Codd
Clivia nobilis Lindl.
Crinum
campanulatum Herb.
lineare L. f.
variabile (Jacq.) Herb.
Cyrtanthus
clavatus (L ’Herit.) R.A. Dyer
helictus Lehm.
huttonii Bak.
smithiae Watt ex Harv.
spiralis Burch, ex Ker-Gawl.
Bobartia orientalis J.B. Gillett*
Dietes bicolor (Steud.) Sweet ex Klatt
Gladiolus
gueinzii Kunze
oppositiflorus Herb, subsp. salmoneus (Bak.) Oberm.
Strehtzia juncea Link
Acrolophia micrantha (Lindl) Schltr. & H. Bol.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
277
Anochilus flanaganii (H. Bol.) Rolfe
Disa tysonii H. Bol
Crassula
aiborescens (Mill.) Willd. subsp. undulatifolia Toelken
socialis Schonl. *
Elephantorrhiza sp.
Diosma passerinoides Steud.
Commiphora harveyi (Engl) Engl
Euphorbia
jansenvillensis Nel
ledienii Berger var. dregei N.E. Br.
Greyia flanaganii H. Bol
Sterculia alexandri Harv.
Cassipourea flanaganii (Schinz) Alston
Cussonia gamtoosensis Strey*
Myrsine pillansii Adamson
Brachystelma meyerianum Schltr.
Trichocaulon annulatum N.E. Br.
Iboza barberae N.E. Br.
Streptocarpus kentaniensis Britten & Story
Gardenia thunbergii L. f.
Euryops latifolius B. Nord.
Bothalia 18,2: 279-287 (1988)
Description of a proteoid-restioid stand in Mesic Mountain Fynbos of
the south-western Cape and some aspects of its ecology
G. DAVIS*
Keywords: Chondropetalum hookerianum, duplex soil. Erica cristata, Fynbos Biome, Leucadendron xanthoconus, mediterranean-
type climate, Mountain Fynbos, soil nutrients
ABSTRACT
A description of the community and its climatic and edaphic environments is given for a stand of Mountain
Fynbos vegetation codominated by Leucadendron xanthoconus and Chondropetalum hookerianum . The paper
categorizes aspects of the study site either according to existing classifications, or by comparison with other fyn-
bos systems. Comparison of rainfall and temperature data with those collected at an agricultural research station
in the region indicated high variability in the spatial and temporal pattern of precipitation, and an air temperature
regime which was influenced by the topography. Analysis of vegetation data revealed a species richness lower
than other fynbos communities, but a species turnover of similar magnitude. A list of flowering plants and ferns
found in the stand is appended. The soil of Table Mountain Group origin comprised a colluvial A-E horizon
with a well defined stone-line, and residual B and C horizons of shale origin. It had low pH and nutrient status,
with a high measured concentration of aluminium, especially in the B horizon.
UITTREKSEL
’n Bergfynbos-plantegroeigemeenskap met Leucadendron xanthoconus en Chondropetalum hookerianum as
dominante plantsoorte, asook die kKmaats- en edafiese omgewing daarvan, word beskryf. Die artikel kategoriseer
aspekte van die studieterrein of volgens huidige klassifikasies of deur vergelyking met ander fynbossisteme. Reen-
val- en temperatuurdata is met die van ’n landbounavorsingstasie in dieselfde streek vergelyk. Hierdie vergelykings
het aangetoon dat die neerslag binne die streek baie veranderlik ten opsigte van ruimte en tyd was, en dat tempe-
ratuur deur die topografie beinvloed is. Ontleding van die plantegroeidata het aangetoon dat die spesierykheid
laer as die van ander gemeenskappe in die fynbos was, maar dat die spesieomset ongeveer dieselfde was. ’n Lys
van blomplante en varings wat in die stand aangetref word, word bygevoeg. Die grond van Tafelberggroep-oorsprong
het uit ’n kolluviale A-E-horison met ’n duidelike kliplyn, en residuele B- en C-horisonne van skalie-oorsprong
bestaan. Die pH- en voedingstofstatus was laag, met ’n hoe aluminiumkonsentrasie, veral in die B-horison.
INTRODUCTION
Mountain Fynbos is the best preserved vegetation type
in the Fynbos Biome of the Cape (Moll & Bossi 1984).
The poor, highly leached soils of these upland sites
(Kruger 1979) have proved unsuitable for conventional
agriculture, and direct commercial utilization is restrict-
ed almost entirely to silviculture and the wildflower in-
dustry. As a large-scale international trade, the latter
is relatively young, and production techniques are in
many instances still experimental (Davis 1984). It is
expected that wildflower producers will increasingly
favour cultivation over the traditional veld-harvesting
method of floricultural production to assist in control-
ling product quality (Brits et al. 1983). Those parts of
the relatively unutilized Mountain Fynbos which con-
tain the preferred habitats of many of the showy pro-
teaceous species, are seen as the logical locations for
this branch of agricultural development. This article
is based on observations made during the first phase
of a study into the possible effects of physical disturb-
ance by agricultural tillage on natural Mountain Fynbos.
The primary objective of this paper is to describe
the chosen study site in terms of the existing classifica-
tions and other frames of reference normally used for
* Experimental Ecology Division, Botanical Research Institute,
Private Bag X16, Rondebosch 7700.
MS. received: 1987.10.22.
fynbos systems. Where this is not possible, or is not
appropriate, comparison with data from other fynbos
studies is attempted. The rationale for these exercises
is two-fold. Firstly, recognition of common sets of at-
tributes, especially ecologically functional ones, is a
necessary basis for formulating the management strate-
gies required for utilization and conservation of Moun-
tain Fynbos vegetation. Secondly, where the classifica-
tions used to describe Mountain Fynbos systems are
incomplete, the task of workers motivated to update
them, is facilitated by available quantitative data. This
paper endeavours also to be a small part of that acces-
sible repository.
STUDY AREA
The chosen site is on the south edge of the Grabouw
Basin, Caledon District, within a region where quartzite,
sandstone and thin bands of shale and conglomerate of
the upper Table Mountain Group outcrop, as document-
ed on the 1:125 000 geological map of the area (Govern-
ment Printer 1 966). It lies on a gentle slope of approxi-
mately 8% , with an aspect of 246° and at an altitude of
375 m. It is 10,5 km from the sea on the landward side
of a ridge which rises to a maximum height of approxi-
mately 500 m. The grid co-ordinates of the site are:
34° 15' 38"S and 19° 6’ 38"E. Until March 1987, the
area in which the study site is located was managed by
the Directorate of Forestry (Department of Environ-
ment Affairs) as a mountain water catchment area. It is
280
now under the control of the Department of Nature and
Environmental Conservation (Cape Provincial Adminis-
tration).
METHODS
Development of the study site
An experimental plot 50 x 50 m was delineated at
the site during 1984. Sample quadrats (2 x 2 m) were
delineated at 28 regularly spaced stations, providing a
sampling intensity of 4% for the major components of
the vegetation. As part of the long-term experimental
design the site was cleared by means of a controlled
burn in February 1985.
Climatic data
A weather station was set up on the cleared area and
a data-logging device (MC Systems, Cape Town) instal-
led. This monitored a set of environmental parameters,
including precipitation and air temperature. Regional
long-term precipitation data were obtained from records
of the Weather Bureau (1985), and from a statistical
report issued by the Soil and Irrigation Research Insti-
tute (Agrometeorological Division 1983) for the follow-
ing stations respectively: Highlands Forest Station (34°
1 7'S; 19° 6'E; 426 m) over the period 1938—1984;
and the experimental farm of the Fruit and Fruit Tech-
nology Research Institute in Elgin (34° 8'S; 19° 2'E;
305 m) over the period 1963—1983. As an estimate of
the long-term mean air temperature at the study site,
long-term data from the Elgin Station (Agrometeorolo-
gical Division 1983) were adjusted by the differences
recorded for this same parameter at the two stations
during the period July 1985— June 1986 (see Results).
For periods when the data-logging equipment was
non-functional (a total time of approximately six weeks
during the sample period of July 1985— December 1986),
precipitation data recorded at the Highlands Forest Sta-
tion, 2,5 km to the south-west, have been used. Means
of the monthly totals at these two stations during 1986
agreed to within 1,3%. Temperature data were not aug-
mented in this way.
Vegetation
Mature vegetation was sampled at the 28 stations
mentioned above. A 1 x 1 m subquadrat was used for
close inspection of the less conspicuous species. A list
of all identified species of ferns and flowering plants
observed on random scans of the plot and its immediate
surroundings (a total area of ± 0,65 ha) is given in the
Appendix. Further species recognized as distinct are
not recorded because the material found was such that
it could not be identified.
A single set of nested quadrats (after Whittaker et
al. 1979) was marked out in veld adjacent to the study
plot for the construction of a species-area curve to per-
mit comparison of the site with data from other studies.
The number of different species was measured in qua-
drats of: 1 mz (10 replicates); 10 m2 (2 replicates);
100 m2 and 1 000 m2 (no replication).
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
Age of the stand was estimated by counting the num-
ber of nodes on the largest individuals of the dominant
shrub species, Leucadendron xanthoconus (Kuntze) K.
Schum., and cross-checking against aerial photographic
records of the Department of Surveys and Mapping.
Soil
Description of the soil profile was provided by three
shallow soil pits (approximately 0,8 m deep), and a
single deeper one (1 ,8 m). For analysis of the physical
and chemical characteristics of the soil, samples were
taken from the A horizon, the top of the B horizon,
and a single sample from saprolitic parent material at
2 m. Each of these samples was air-dried and sieved to
2 mm. Nutrient analyses were performed by the regional
Soil Analytic Laboratory of the Department of Agricul-
ture and Water Supply (Winter Rainfall Region) at Elsen-
burg using methods described by Jackson (1958), Hesse
(1971), the Fertilizer Society of South Africa (1974),
and Moore & Chapman (1986). Bulk density and field
capacity were determined on undisturbed soil cores,
and texture on 2 mm sieved samples.
As possible factors influencing pedogenesis at the
site, incidental observations of plant or animal inter-
actions with the soil were noted; the most apparent of
these was the presence of a number of termite mounds.
RESULTS
Climate
The climatic diagram (after Muller 1982), derived for
the study site from the adjusted data of Highlands Forest
Station and Elgin Experimental Farm, is given in Figure
1 . Figure 2 shows the total monthly rainfall measured
at the study site (with adjustments for missing data —
see Methods), together with concurrent and long-term
data from other sites. Figure 3 demonstrates that on a
weekly basis during the sample period the rainfall was
very unevenly distributed between the Highlands study
site and Elgin, although total precipitation received during
1986 at each station was similar (Highlands, 1 110 mm
and Elgin, 1 090 mm). The weekly Highlands total of
123,4 mm in this latter figure comprises precipitation
recorded by the Highlands Forest Station during a single
FIGURE 1. — The derived climate diagram for the Highlands
study site. The broken line depicts mean monthly air temp-
erature, while the solid line is total monthly precipitation
(after Muller 1982).
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
HS86 EH EEF06 CZJ HFLT B EEFLT
FIGURE 2. — Total monthly precipitation during 1986, and
long-term averages for sites in Highlands and Elgin. Legend
symbols are as follows: HS86 = Highlands study site,
1986; EEF86 = Elgin Experimental Farm, 1986; HFLT
= Highlands Forest Station (1938-1984); and EEFLT =
Elgin Experimental Farm (1963-1983).
24 h period in February 1986 when the data logger sys-
tem at the study site was not functional. An accumula-
tion type rain gauge at the study site confirmed rainfall
in excess of 100 mm for the month of February.
For reasons dictated by the completeness and reliabil-
ity of the data, air temperature regimes are given for the
period July 1985 to June 1986 (see Figure 4). The most
noticeable differences between these two locations are
the consistently warmer mean temperatures during the
spring and summer months, and the year-round colder
minima at the Elgin Station. A 10-day period of missing
logged data at the study site during February may cause
the reported extreme values to be inaccurate for that
month.
Vegetation
Vegetation at the site was estimated to be 12 years
old. Aerial photographs taken in 1973 (Department of
Surveys and Mapping) indicated that the area had been
recently burned. This agreed with the Highlands Forest
Station records documenting an accidental fire during
the same year. The plant community was characterized
by a shrub layer largely comprising Leucadendron xantho-
conus, and a dense restioid component dominated by
Chondropetalum hookerianum (Masters) Pill. The mean
ELGIN PPTN (mm)
FIGURE 3. — Comparison of weekly precipitation totals record-
ed at Highlands (combined forest station and study site
data), and the Elgin Experimental Farm during 1986.
281
1985 1986
FIGURE 4. — Mean monthly temperature measures recorded at
the Highlands study site and the Elgin Experimental Farm
during the period July 1985 to July 1986. February values
for Highlands include a 10-day period of missing data,
which could cause the extreme values during that month
to be unrepresentative.
measured density of L. xanthoconus on the plot was 1 ,7
mature plants per m2 (1 ,23 S.D.) with a mean height of
0,80 m (0,155 S.D.). Approximate projected cover of
live restioid shoot material (mostly Chondropetalum
hookerianum ) was 39%, and that of accumulated dead
tissue added a further 35%. A third species which was
abundant throughout the site was Erica cristata Dulfer.
This species had a frequency of occurrence of 93%, but
probably contributed little to the aboveground biomass
of the system owing to its sparse and rangy habit. Another
conspicuous shrub species at the site was Erica longifolia
Ait., which was thinly and unevenly distributed (0,48
mature plants per m2 ; 1,2 S.D.) with individual heights
of up to 1,4 m.
The mean species richness in the set of twenty-eight
1 m2 quadrats was calculated to be 7,7 species per m2
(1,7 S.D.), whereas the 1 m2 quadrats of the nested set
afforded a slightly higher value of 8,6 species per m2
(1,7 S.D.). The overall mean for these two sets is 7,9
species per m2. The larger quadrats of the nested set
contained 19 (mean of 2); 37; and 56 species in 10m2,
100 m2, and 1 000 m2 respectively. A linear regression
between the number of species (S), and the log10 of the
quadrat area (LogA) gave the following relationship:
S = 6,12 + 16,02 LogA (r2 =0,984)
The species list (see Appendix) contains the names of
all taxa recorded at the site both before the experimental
burn in 1985, and for two subsequent seasons.
Soil
Soil at the site was duplex, a category found through-
out the south-western Cape (Schloms et al. 1983). It
comprised a dense underlying stratum of saprolitic shale
with a shallow (150-800 mm) colluvial overburden of
predominantly quartzitic material. The top stratum con-
sisted of an orthic A horizon, a leached E horizon, and
a basal stone-line (commonly 1 50 mm thick) of quartz
and sandstone rock fragments. In places, the topsoil
contained more fine shale-derived material, while in
others the sandy surface layer was missing entirely,
leaving a lithosolic A/E horizon. Rock particles varied
282 Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
TABLE 1.— Chemical and physical properties of soil at the Highlands study site. Mean values are given for each parameter, followed
by the standard deviation of the mean. Values for the C horizon represent a single sample only, and bulk density of the B hori-
zon a set of 2 values
in the size of their largest dimension from less than 10
mm, to more than 300 mm, and were usually heavily
ferruginized. The B horizon was composed exclusively
of the shale-derived material, showed weak structure,
and tended to be gleycutanic. The deeper soil pit which
was dug outside of the study plot and adjacent to an
area with outcropping sandstone, revealed in the sub-
soil horizon a layer of pre-weathered sandstone approxi-
mately 1 ,2 m thick, bounded above and below by shale-
derived material. This band dipped at an angle of ap-
proximately 45°, and it is thought that the C horizon
throughout the study plot was effectively within the
upper shale stratum. With regard to the classification
system developed by MacVicar et al. (1977), the soil
could be placed in the Kroonstad Form (Mkambati or
Avoca Series), although where the B horizon displayed
more prismatic structure and darker cutans, association
with the Estcourt Form was stronger (Uitvlugt or Est-
court Series). Identification of the soil series was equi-
vocal on account of the variability of the clay content
of the E horizon, a diagnostic feature of both forms.
Results of the physical and chemical analyses per-
formed on samples taken from the site are summarized
in Table 1. In terms of the textural classification includ-
ed by MacVicar et al. (1977), soil of the A horizon lies
on the border between loamy sand and sandy loam.
Field capacity of the top layer of soil, expressed as
gravimetric water content, was measured as 22,5%
(3,57 S.D.).
The following features which might influence profile
development were observed at the site: 1, surface soil
movement under the influence of winter runoff; 2,
waterlogging of the colluvial stratum, but not the B
horizon during winter; 3, the presence of termite
colonies ( Amitermes sylvestris ) whose mounds were
present with a mean density of 120 per ha, and a ma< n
height of 350 mm; 4, the occurrence of earthworms
(infrequently observed); 5, occasional mole or mole
rat activity; and 6, the penetration of roots into the
dense B horizon. This latter phenomenon was limited
to structural faults and was noted as occurring to the
maximum investigated depth of 1,8 m. These roots
probably belonged to Leucadendron xanthoconus in-
dividuals, the only species whose roots were positively
identified as penetrating into the B horizon. Fungal
hyphae were also observed in old root channels in this
horizon.
DISCUSSION
Climate
The climate diagram (Figure 1) based on long-term
data depicts a typical humid mediterranean-type with
winter half-year rainfall (May to October) exceeding
65% of the 928 mm annual total, and a distinct winter
with at least one mean monthly temperature less than
15°C (Aschmann 1973). As described by Fuggle & Ash-
ton (1979), the climates of the Fynbos Biome form a
‘spatially diverse mosaic’ on account of its mountainous
topography. Comparison of the observed climatic para-
meters at the study site and at the Elgin Experimental
Farm illustrates this diversity, with precipitation patterns
in the region being especially non-uniform (Table 2).
TABLE 2. — Long-term annual precipitation at various stations
within the Grabouw Basin
EF, experimental farm; FS, forest station; Agromet., Agrome-
teorology Division; WB, Weather Bureau.
Both alia 18,2 (1988)
The heterogeneity of the rainfall may also play a
critical role in the fire ecology of these seasonally flam-
mable areas. The single highest rainfall event at the
Highlands Forestry Station during the sample period
occurred in February, the height of the fire season. Such
temporal and spatial patchiness of rainfall acting over
the millennia of fynbos evolution could have contributed
significantly to a patchy fire history, and hence to the
heterogeneous mosaic of the present-day vegetation.
Regional patterns of ambient air temperature appear
to be more predictable than those of precipitation (Figure
3). The warmer spring and summer mean air temperatures,
and the colder year-round minima of the Elgin Experi-
mental Farm relative to the Highlands study site, can
probably be explained by the location of the former
station. Elgin almost certainly experiences more restrict-
ed air movement during the windier spring and summer
period than the study site (partly supported by un-
published data from this study); and perennial nocturnal
drainage of cold air (Barry & Chorley 1982) from the
large mountains of the Hottentots Holland and Fransch-
hoek to the north. See Davis (1987) for a brief discus-
sion of wind at the study site.
Vegetation
The criteria established by Taylor (1978) for the de-
finition of fynbos are amply satisfied by vegetation at
the study site, and the species which characterize it, all
have distributions restricted to the Fynbos Biome as
delineated by Moll & Bossi (1984).
Species richness at the site was lower than the much
quoted fynbos figure of 121 flowering plant species
within an area of 100 m2 (Taylor 1972). Unfortunately
this figure has been quoted in the literature as a bench-
mark of species richness in fynbos (e.g. Bond 1983;
Jarman 1982; and Taylor 1978), when, in fact, it is
given in a semi-popular article in which descriptive de-
tails are omitted. Better documented figures are pre-
sented by Bond (1983), who reports a maximum figure
of 104 species in an area of 1 000 m2 in a Jonkershoek
stand of Protea nitida (waboomveld), the extrapolation
of which on the log-scale would agree well with the total
of 126 species recorded at the Highlands study site in
an area of approximately 0,65 ha. In the same paper,
Bond presents a synoptic species-log area curve for fyn-
bos vegetation in the southern Cape mountains. For the
formulation S = b + dlog10A, where S is the number of
species in an area A, he found b = 16,4 and d = 15,8.
These constants of the linear equation represent ‘point
diversity’ and species turnover (or community patchiness)
respectively (Bond 1983). Highlands data indicate a sig-
nificantly lower point diversity (t-test; p <0,001), but a
similar patchiness for the community at the study site.
They are more similar to those obtained by Whittaker
et al. (1979) for mallee vegetation in New South Wales,
Australia (b = 5,3 and d = 15,3). Based on a sample area
of 100 m2, Cowling (1983) reported species-richness of
26,5 for Mountain Fynbos in the south-eastern Cape.
This is lower than the Highlands figure, while on the
other hand the mean of his ‘point diversity’ (sensu Bond
1983) for fynbos shrubland sites was twice that of the
study site. The measures of diversity discussed above
lend a valuable perspective to the description of the
283
Highlands study site, but as yet the body of available
information is insufficient for this parameter to be used
as an accurate classifier.
According to the description of post-fire succession in
fynbos by Kruger & Bigalke (1984), as summarized by
Rutherford & Westfall (1986), the 12-year post-fire
stand of the study site was in an early stage of maturity,
a phase during which the codominance of phanero-
phytes, chamaephytes, and hemicryptophytes is best de-
veloped. However, the abundance of restioid shoot tissue
and the consequent build-up of a dense mat of Utter may
effectively advance the maturation process in the site
community by causing premature reduction in species
richness.
Subjectively, the mature vegetation of the study site
was best described as a Leucadendron xanthoconus
stand, with an understorey dominated by Chondropeta-
lum hookerianum and Erica cristata. These species have
distributions as follows: L. xanthoconus and C. hooke-
rianum occur from the Cape Peninsula eastward as far
as Bredasdorp (Vogts 1982) and Riversdale (Linder 1985)
respectively, while E. cristata is restricted to the area
between Sir Lowry’s Pass and the Klein River Mountains
(Baker & OUver 1967). Grobler (1964), Boucher (1972,
1978), Kruger (1974), and Durand (1981) have all con-
ducted vegetation surveys within a 15 km radius of the
study site, and although they cite some species con-
spicuous in the Highlands vegetation, none of their
community descriptions characterize it. Inspection of
Boucher’s (1978) data for the occurrence of the above
three species in his study area between Cape Hangklip
and the Palmiet River revealed a pattern (Figure 5), which
suggests that the convergence of all three at Highlands
may be a characteristic feature of the site. In two of the
three instances where this occurred in Boucher’s study,
soil was of the duplex Estcourt Form. (It is possible that
E. cristata and C. hookerianum form a commensalistic
association, in which physical support of the trailing
ericoid by the erect restioid may be an element, a phe-
nomenon observed in the mature vegetation at the study
site.)
Comparison of the Highlands species list (see Appen-
dix) with those of Boucher (1978) and Kruger (1974)
FIGURE 5. — Frequencies with which the three species Leuca-
dendron xanthoconus, Chondropetalum hookerianum and
Erica cristata occurred at Mountain Fynbos sample plots
in the Cape Hangklip area, and their degree of distributional
overlap. Drawn from the data of Boucher (1978).
284
confirmed the small degree of overlap at the species
level. Of the Highlands species, approximately one third
of the total number was contained in each of the other
lists, while less than 20% were common to all three.
Kruger & Taylor (1980) have previously demonstrated
that a 60% difference in species composition exists
between Cape Hangklip and Jakkalsrivier.
The above discussion suggests that while many phyto-
sociological elements of the region are represented at the
study site, regional patchiness might easily make mani-
festation of a previously recognized community unlikely.
In an attempt to improve upon the phytosociological
approach to classification of Mountain Fynbos vegeta-
tion, Campbell (1985, 1986) invested considerable effort
in constructing a structural classification with a priori
rules for classifying communities. He pointed out (Camp-
bell 1985), using stands dominated by Leucadendron
gandogeri as an example, that some assemblages of plant
life will necessarily defy classification by that particular
system. Interpretation of the Highlands vegetation ac-
cording to the key of structural features affords it a simi-
larly equivocal position. Careful consideration of the
Highlands vegetation may offer additional information
to resolve that particular shortcoming of the structural
classification.
Soil
As with the composition of plant communities, soil
is a characteristically variable component of the Fynbos
Biome (Moll & Jarman 1984). Boucher (1978) counted
eight soil forms (14 series) in his study area of 1 15 km2 ,
but some of his classified mountain plant communities
included up to six of these. Estcourt, one of the forms
identified at the Highlands site, occurred at 15% of his
mountain releves as the Soldaatskraal Series, while
Kroonstad was not listed at all. Kruger (1974), noted
six forms within the 1,58 km2 Jakkalsrivier catchment,
none of which was in common with the Highlands site.
Campbell (1983), in his extensive survey of montane
environments in the Fynbos Biome also encountered
none of the forms identified at the study site, although
the Highlands data are consistent with the generalized
gradients which summarize his work. Considering the
shale-derived component of the Highlands soil, his
warning against equating non-quartzitic origin in Moun-
tain Fynbos soil with nutrient-richness is borne out.
In the broad context of fynbos soils, topsoil at the
study site is typical in that it is acid, leached, and
nutrient poor (Kruger 1979). Being duplex in nature,
however, the dense B horizon acts as an impediment
to the vertical loss of many of the soil constituents
that might normally be removed from the system during
the podzolization process, although throughflow (Trud-
gill 1977) may account for loss via seeps. (The working
definition of nutrient-poorness supplied by Campbell
(1983) is easily met for both A and B horizons.)
Apart from some intensive studies on lowland sys-
tems with narrowly defined objectives (e.g. Low 1983;
Mitchell et al. 1984; Stock 1985; Witkowski & Mit-
chell 1987), published data which describe the nutrient
status and cycling processes in fynbos soils are limited.
Information on nutrients in mountain systems is sporadic
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
in the literature, and usually incidental to broader eco-
logical studies. Comparison of the Highlands data with
those describing other Mountain Fynbos sites (Low
1983), indicated that total N in the Highlands topsoil
was greater than at these other sites by factors of be-
tween 1,1 and 3,2. The measured available P was com-
parable to the values of between 2,5 and 4,5 jug-g'1 re-
ported by Read & Mitchell (1983) for coastal fynbos.
The C.E.C. measured at the Highlands site fell into the
wide range of values measured by Kruger (1974) for
soils at Jakkalsrivier (0,5 to 44,0 me/100 g), while it
was appropriately lower (for an oligotrophic soil) than
the approximate mean of 14 me/ 100 g given by Tucker
(1983) for a range of non-carbonate soils in Australia
and the USA.
Accumulation of clay particles at the top of the B
horizon clearly increased the measured C.E.C. at this
level (Table 1), but parallel concentration of aluminium
may outweigh the advantage of this to plants by reduc-
ing the availability of phosphorus under the inherently
acid conditions (White 1979). The ability of Scottish
heathland plants to survive on soils with high Al content
is demonstrated in a study cited by Woolhouse (1981)
where concentrations of 0,17% (18,9 me/100 g) are re-
ported for the Bj horizon. These figures are somewhat
greater in magnitude than those obtained for soil of the
Highlands study site. It would be reasonable to suppose
that the toxic effects of Al are countered either edaphi-
cally (Norrish & Rosser 1983), or physiologically within
heathland and fynbos systems, where this element is liable
to be common (Hesse 1971).
The observed downhill movement of topsoil during
the rainy season at the Highlands site implies that the
process of soil creep responsible for the formation of
this duplex soil is still in progress. However, root pene-
tration, together with some activities of the soil fauna,
may be acting to ameliorate and stabilize the soil in local
patches.
Synthesis
The data which describe phenomena of the Highlands
study site are valuable to the ongoing study by providing
a base-line for the investigation of ecosystem functions.
The immediate objective, however, is to place that infor-
mation in a general descriptive context which relates to
other Mountain Fynbos systems. This is attempted in
Table 3.
TABLE 3. — A summary description of the Highlands study site
with regard to the climate, vegetation and soil
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
285
CONCLUSION
As human demands inevitably increase with time, con-
servation and effective utilization of natural resources
such as Mountain Fynbos vegetation will depend greatly
on the extent to which managers are able to identify
and predict responses of ecosystems to the impacts of
exploitation. Classification of ecosystem attributes is an
important step in establishing a means to extrapolate
knowledge of specific sites to larger managerial units.
Treating the Highlands site as a test case, we have seen
above that hopes for the development of a classification
which encompasses the functional complexity of Moun-
tain Fynbos are justified. This is especially true consider-
ing the large body of information which has accumulated
over the past decade under the co-ordination of the Fyn-
bos Biome Project of the CSIR (see Moll & Jarman 1984).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The help and co-opcration of people too numerous to
list here is gratefully acknowledged. Amongst them are
Mr J.J.N. Lambrechts, Miss Elsie Esterhuysen, and Dr
Richard Cowling, as well as personnel of the Directorate
of Forestry, and the Botanical Research Unit at Stellen-
bosch. The advice of Dr M.C. Rutherford on preparation
of the manuscript, and the assistance throughout of
Andrew Flynn is greatly appreciated, especially with
respect to compilation of the species list.
1 REFERENCES
AGROMETEOROLOGICAL DIVISION 1983 . Agro-climatologi-
cal report of the south-western Cape. Soil and Irrigation
Research Institute, Elsenburg.
ASCHMANN, H. 1973. Distribution and peculiarity of mediter-
ranean ecosystems. In F. di Castri & H.A. Mooney, Medi-
terranean type ecosystems. Origin and structure. Springer-
Verlag, Berlin.
BAKER, H.A. & OLIVER, E.G.H. 1967. Ericas in southern Afri-
ca. Purnell, Cape Town.
BARRY, R.G. & CHORLEY, R.J. 1982. Atmosphere, weather,
and climate, 4th edn. Methuen, New York.
BOND, P. & GOLDBLATT, P. 1984. Plants of the Cape flora.
A descriptive catalogue. Journal of South African Botany,
Supplementary Vol. 13.
BOND, W. 1983. On alpha diversity and the richness of the Cape
flora: a study in southern Cape fynbos. In F.J. Kruger,
D.T. Mitchell & J.U.M. Jarvis, Mediterranean-type ecosys-
tems. The role of nutrients. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
• BOUCHER, C. 1972. The vegetation of the Cape Hangklip area.
M.Sc. thesis, University of Cape Town.
BOUCHER, C. 1978. Cape Hangklip area. II. The vegetation.
Bothalia 12: 455-497.
BRITS, G.J., JACOBS, G. & VOGTS, M.M. 1983. Domestication
of fynbos Proteaceae as a floricultural crop. Bothalia 14:
641-646.
CAMPBELL, B.M. 1983. Montane plant environments in the Fyn-
bos Biome. Bothalia 14: 283-298.
CAMPBELL, B.M. 1985. A classification of the mountain vegeta-
tion of the Fynbos Biome. Memoirs of the Botanical Sur-
vey of South Africa No. 50.
CAMPBELL, B.M. 1986. Vegetation classification in a floristical-
ly complex area: the Cape floristic region. South African
Journal of Botany 52: 129-140.
COWLING, R.M. 1983. Diversity relations in Cape shrublands
and other vegetation in the south-eastern Cape, South
Africa Vegetatio 54: 103-127.
DAVIS, G.W. 1984. Flowers from fynbos — the need for a policy
of resource management for the wildflower industry. Veld
& Flora 70: 116-118.
DAVIS, G.W. 1987. Performance of a laboratory-constructed
anemometer under summer field conditions on a Moun-
tain Fynbos experimental site. Bothalia 17: 136-138.
DURAND, B.J. 1981. A study of the short-term responses of
fynbos to fire in the Kogelberg State Forest, South Africa.
M.Sc. thesis, University of Cape Town.
FERTILIZER SOCIETY OF SOUTH AFRICA 1974. Manual of
soil analysis methods. The Fertilizer Society of South
Africa, Pretoria
FUGGLE, R.F. & ASHTON, E.R. 1979. Climate. In J. Day,
W.R. Siegfried, G.N. Louw & M.L. Jarman, Fynbos ecology:
a preliminary synthesis. Scientific Programmes Report No.
40. CSIR, Pretoria.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., REID, C., VAN ROOY, J. & SMOOK,
L. 1985. List of species of southern African plants. Edn.
2, Part 1. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Afri-
ca No. 51.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., WELMAN, W.G., RETIEF, E„ IMMEL-
MAN, K.L., GERMISHUIZEN, G., PIENAAR, B.J. &
NICHOLAS, A. 1987. List of species of southern African
plants. Edn 2, Part 2. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of
South Africa No. 56.
GOVERNMENT PRINTER 1966. Geological map. 3319C-
Worcester/3419A-Caledon. Government Printer, Pretoria.
GROBLER, P.J. 1964. Die plantegroei en flora van 'n area op
Oudebos in Kogelbergreservaat, Caledon. M.Sc. thesis,
University of Stellenbosch.
HESSE, P.R. 1971. A textbook of soil chemical analysis. Murray,
London.
JACKSON, M.L. 1958. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice-Hall,
New Jersey.
JARMAN, M. 1982. A look at the littlest floral kingdom. Scientiae
23: 9-19.
KRUGER, F.J. 1974. The physiography and plant communities
of the Jakkalsrivier catchment. M.Sc. thesis, University of
Stellenbosch.
KRUGER, F.J. 1979. South African heathlands. In R.L. Specht,
Ecosystems of the world. Vol. 9 A. Heathlands and related
shrublands. Descriptive studies. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
KRUGER, F.J. & BIGALKE, R.C. 1984. Fire in fynbos. In P. de
V. Booysen & N.M. Tainton, Ecological effects of fire in
South African ecosystems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
KRUGER, F.J. & TAYLOR, H.C. 1980. Plant species diversity
in Cape fynbos: gamma and delta diversity. Vegetatio 41:
85-93.
LINDER, H.P. 1985. Conspectus of the African species of Res-
tionaceae. Bothalia 15: 387-503.
LOW, A.B. 1983. Phytomass and major nutrient pools in an 11-
year post-fire coastal fynbos community. South African
Journal of Botany 2: 98-104.
MACVICAR, C.N., DE VILLIERS, J.M., LOXTON, R.F., VER-
STER, E., LAMBRECHTS, J.J.N., MERRYWEATHER,
F.R., LE ROUX, J., VAN R OO YEN, T.H. & VON HARM-
SE, H.J. 1977. Soil classification. A binomial system for
South Africa. Dept, of Agricultural Technical Services,
Pretoria.
MITCHELL, D.T., BROWN, G. & JONGENS-ROBERTS, S.M.
1984. Variation of forms of phosphorus in the sandy soils
of coastal fynbos, south-western Cape. Journal of Ecology
72: 575-584.
MOLL, E.J. & BOSSI, L. 1984. Assessment of the extent of the
natural vegetation of the Fynbos Biome of South Africa.
South African Journal of Science 80: 355-358.
MOLL, E.J. & JARMAN, M. 1984. Clarification of the term fyn-
bos. South African Journal of Science 80: 351—352.
MOORE, P.D. & CHAPMAN, S.B. (eds) 1986. Methods in plant
ecology, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford.
MULLER, M.J. 1982. Selected climatic data for a global set of
standard stations for vegetation science. Junk, The Hague.
NORRISH, K. & ROSSER, H. 1983. Mineral phosphate. In Di-
vision of Soils, CSIRO. Soils, an Australian viewpoint.
CSIRO, Melbourne, Academic Press, London.
READ, D.J. & MITCHELL, D.T. 1983. Decomposition and mine-
ralization processes in mediterranean-type ecosystems and
in heathlands of similar structure. In F.J. Kruger, D.T.
Mitchell & J.U.M. Jarvis, Mediterranean-type ecosystems.
The role of nutrients. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
RUTHERFORD, M.C. & WESTFALL, R.H. 1986. Biomes of
southern Africa — an objective categorization. Memoirs
of the Botanical Survey of South A frica No. 54.
286
SCHLOMS, B.H.A., ELLIS, F. & LAMBRECHTS, J.J.N. 1983.
Soils of the Cape coastal platform. In H.J. Deacon, Q.B.
Hendey & J.J.N. Lambrechts, Fynbos palaeoecology —
a preliminary synthesis. Scientific Programmes Report
No. 75. CSIR, Pretoria.
STOCK, W.D. 1985. An investigation of nitrogen cycling pro-
cesses in a coastal ecosystem in the south-western Cape
Province, South Africa. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cape
Town.
TAYLOR, H.C. 1972. Fynbos. Veld & Flora 2: 68-75.
TAYLOR, H.C. 1978. Capensis. In M.J.A. Werger, Biogeography
and ecology of southern Africa. Junk, The Hague.
TRUDGILL, S.T. 1977. Soil and vegetation systems. Oxford
University Press, Oxford.
TUCKER, B.M. 1983. Basic exchangeable cations. In Division
of Soils, CSIRO. Soils: an Australian viewpoint, pp.928.
CSIRO, Melbourne, Academic Press, London.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
VOGTS, M. 1982. South Africa’s Proteaceae. Struik, Cape Town.
WEATHER BUREAU 1985. Unpublished data. Department of
Environment Affairs.
WHITE, R.E. 1979. Introduction to the principles and practice
of soil science. Blackwell, Oxford.
WHITTAKER, R.H., NIERING, W.A. & CRISP, M.D. 1979.
Structure, pattern, and diversity of a mallee community
in New South Wales. Vegetatio 39: 65-76.
WITKOWSKI, E.T.F. & MITCHELL, D.T. 1987. Variations in
soil phosphorus in the fynbos biome, South Africa. Jour-
nal of Ecology 75: 1159-1171.
WOOLHOUSE, H.W. 1981. Soil acidity, aluminium toxicity and
related problems in the nutrient environment of heath-
lands. In R.L. Specht, Ecosystems of the world. Vol. 9B.
Heathlands and related shrublands. Analytical studies.
Elsevier, Amsterdam.
APPENDIX
A provisional list of the species occurring at the Highlands study site in the Caledon District The alphabetical arrangement of Bond &
Goldblatt (1984) is used here for ease of access, but nomenclature and authorship are according to Gibbs Russell et al. (1985) and
Gibbs Russell et al. (1987), except for the Restionaceae, where Linder (1985) has been used.
SCHIZAEACEAE
Schizaea pectinata (L.) Swartz
PINACEAE
Pinus pinaster Ait.
CYPERACEAE
Chrysithrix capensis L.
Ficinia
albicans Nees
bolusii C.B. CL
capensis L.
ecklonea (Steud.) Nees
fascicularis Nees
lateralis (Vahl) Kunth
paradoxa (Schrad.) Nees
Tetraria
brachyphylla Levyns
capillacea (L.j C.B. CL
compar (L.) Lestib.
cuspidata (Rottb.) C.B. Cl.
fimbriolata (Nees) C.B. Cl.
ustulata (L.) C.B. CL
HAEMODORACEAE
Dilatris pillansii W.F. Barker
Lanaria lanata (L.) Dur. & Schinz
Wachendorfia paniculata Burm.
IRIDACEAE
Anapalina triticea (Burm. f.) N.E. Br.
Aristea
juncifolia Bak.
oligocephala Bak.
spiralis (L. f.) Ker-Gawl.
Bobartia
filiformis (L. f.) Ker-Gawl.
gladiata (L. f ) Ker-GawL
Gladiolus maculatus Sweet
Ixia micrandra Bak.
Micranthus junceus (Bak.) N.E. Br.
Thereianthus bracteolatus (Lam.) G.J. Lewis
Tritoniopsis parviflora (Jacq.) G.J. Lewis
LILIACEAE
Eriospermum sp. Jacq. ex Willd.
ORCHIDACEAE
Ceratandra atrata (L.) Dur. & Schinz
POACEAE
Ehrharta longifolia Schrad
Merxmuellera rufa (Nees) Conert
RESTIONACEAE
Calopsis
hyalina (Mast. ) Linder
membranacea (Pillans) Linder
Cannomois virgata (Rottb.) Steud
Ceratocaryum decipiens (N.E. Br.) Linder
Chondropetalum hookerianum (Mast. ) Pillans
Elegia filacea Mast.
Hypodiscus
albo-aristatus (Nees) Mast.
argenteus (Thunb.) Mast.
aristatus (Thunb.) Krauss
laevigatus (Kunth) Linder
willdenowia (Nees) Mast.
Ischyrolepis caespitosa Esterhuysen
Mastersiella digitata (Thunb.) Gilg-Ben.
Restio
filiformis Poir.
similis Pillans
triticeus Rottb.
verrucosus Esterhuysen
Staberoha cernua (L. f.) Dur. & Schinz
Thamnochortus lucens (Poir.) Linder
Willdenowia sp. cf. arescens Kunth
APIACEAE
Centella restioides Adamson
Lichtensteinia trifida Cham. & Schlechtd.
Peucedanum ferulaceum Thunb.
ASTERACEAE
Berkheya
barbata (L. f. ) Hutch.
herbacea (L. f.) Druce
Corymbium africanum L.
Ely tropappus rhinocerotis (L. f. ) Less.
Gerbera linnaei Cass.
Helichrysum
cymosum (L.) D. Don
pandurifolium Schrank
teretifolium (L.) D. Don
Lachnospermum umbellatum (L. f.) Pillans
Osteospermum tomentosum (L. f.) T. NorL
Othonna quinquedentata Thunb.
Phaenocoma prolifera (L.) D. Don
Senecio
pubigerus L.
triqueter DC.
Stoebe
capitata Berg.
plumosa (L.) Thunb.
Ursinia paleacea (L.) Moench
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
287
BALANOPHORACEAE
Mystropetalon thomii Harv.
BR UNLACE AE
Berzelia lanuginosa (L.J Brongn
Brunia
laevis Thunb.
neglecta Schltr.
CAMPANULACEAE
Lightfootia unidentata (Thunb.) A. DC.
Lobelia tomentosa L. f.
Roella ciliata L.
CRASSULACEAE
Ciassula ericoides Haw.
DROSERACEAE
Drosera
cistiflora L.
trinervia Spreng.
EBENACEAE
Diospyros glabra (L.) De Winter
ERICACEAE
Erica
coccinea L.
corifolia L.
cristata Dulfer
cruenta Soland.
longifolia Ait.
nudiflora L.
pulchella Houtt.
spumosa L.
EUPHORBIACEAE
Euphorbia silenifolia (Haw.) Sweet
FABACEAE
Argyrolobium filiforme EckL & Zeyh.
Aspalathus sp.
Otholobium rotundifolium (L. f.) C.H. Stirton
Rafnia sp.
GENT1ANACEAE
Chironia linoides L.
GERANIACEAE
Pelargonium ellaphiae E.M. Marais
LOBELIACEAE
Cyphia volubilis (Burm. f.) WUld.
Merciera leptoloba A. DC.
OXALIDACEAE
Oxalis polyphylla Jacq.
PENAEACEAE
Penaea mucronata L.
POLYGALACEAE
Poly gala bracteolata L.
PROTEACEAE
Aulax umbellata (Thunb.) R. Br.
Diastella thymelaeoides (Berg. ) Rourke
Leucadendron
salignum Berg.
xanthoconus (Kuntze) K. Schum.
Leucospermum truncatulum (Salisb. ex Knight) Rourke
Protea
cordata Thunb.
longifolia Andr.
scabra R. Br.
Serruria
barbigera Knight
elongata R. Br.
Spatalla racemosa (L.) Druce
RHAMNACEAE
Phylica
atrata Licht. ex Roem. & Schult.
ericoides L.
imberbis Berg.
ROSACEAE
Cliff ortia complanata E. Mey.
RUB1ACEAE
Anthospermum galioides Reichb.
RUTACEAE
Diosma oppositifolia L.
SELAGINACEAE
Selago scabrida Thunb.
STILBACEAE
Campylostachys cemua (L. f. ) Kunth
Stilbe ericoides (L.) L.
THYMELAEACEAE
Gnidia anomala Meisn
Struthiola eckloniana Meisn
ZYGOPHYLLACEAE
Zygophyllum fulvum L.
Bothalia 18,2: 289-291 (1988)
Miscellaneous notes
VARIOUS AUTHORS
THE PLANT NUMBER SCALE — AN IMPROVED METHOD OF COVER ESTIMATION USING
VARIABLE-SIZED BELT TRANSECTS
INTRODUCTION
The vegetation ecology of the Transvaal Waterberg is
currently being investigated at a scale of 1:250000
(Westfall in prep.). Vegetation structure is being analysed
according to Edwards (1983) using the cover meter
(Westfall & Panagos 1984) for cover determinations in
each height class. In the floristic analysis, individual
species cover is estimated by using the Domin-Krajina
cover-abundance scale (Mueller-Dombois & Ellenberg
1974).
A comparison of recorded species cover, being the
sum of the class midpoints according to the Domin-
Krajina scale (Mueller-Dombois & Ellenberg 1974), with
the structural cover should result in the summed species
cover for a stand being: 1, greater than the cover of the
height class with the greatest cover, and 2, less than the
summed cover of all the height classes, provided that 3,
quadrat size is such as to include those species contribut-
ing significantly to the total cover of the stand.
In the vegetation being investigated, quadrat size is
generally commensurate with species richness (Westfall
et al. 1987). However, the summed estimated species
cover was often considerably less than the mean cover
for the height classes with the greatest cover for the
same stands. Overcompensation for the underestimation
of species cover often led to the summed estimated
species cover being considerably greater than the summed
cover of all the height classes for the same stands (West-
fall in prep.). Clearly, improved species cover estimations
are required for species cover to have any relevance other
than an approximate indication of relative abundance.
In estimating species cover, according to Edwards
(1983), the observer is often inclined to ignore grasses
without inflorescences and to estimate from a static
position without taking plant size and distribution into
account. For example, a larger plant should require a
larger area to be observed than a smaller plant. Further-
more, although mean canopy diameter can be readily
estimated it is often far more difficult to estimate mean
distance apart in terms of mean canopy diameter because
of often highly irregular plant distribution.
To overcome these problems, the approach suggested
here is based on a simple estimate of area and a count of
the individuals of a species within the area.
METHODS
The cover of a species is given by Edwards (1983) for
hexagonal packing by
90,7
(n+1)2
where c = percentage crown cover and n = the mean
number of crown diameters by which the plant crowns
are separated.
Assuming hexagonal packing, the transect area, of
which the percentage crown cover is a proportion, is
given by:
sin 60° (n+1) 30D
where D = mean crown diameter and 30 = the value for
obtaining a minimum of 0,1% cover. Cover of less than
0,1% is not considered significant. Transect length is,
therefore, 30D and transect width is sin 60° (n+1). In
practice, transect width was taken as slightly less than
the average gap between plants within or nearest to the
sample quadrat plus the mean crown diameter. The
number of individuals of a species was then counted
within the transect. Only species occurring within the
sample quadrat were recorded and for each a count of
individuals within a transect commensurate with each
species spacing and size was made. Counts of individuals
did not include the first individual as the transect was
started adjacent to the first individual. This permitted a
cover of less than 0,1% where no individuals were
counted. Transect width was never greater than the
length as this could have resulted in actual cover values
of less than 0,1% being given higher cover values.
The mean number of crown diameters (n) by which
the plant crowns are separated within each transect is
given by n = 22^1 where I = number of individuals
counted. Percentage crown cover can then be calculated
according to Edwards (1983). Table 1 shows number of
individuals counted, representation by a single character
symbol and percentage cover for recording purposes in
the field.
Vegetation structure was analysed using the cover
meter and the summed species cover was estimated with
both the Domin-Krajina scale and the plant number scale
as outlined above for five vegetation stands represented
by 21 quadrats. The mean of the shortest and longest
cross distances of each crown was taken as the crown
diameter for each species and these distances were noted
in four categories (Edwards 1983) namely, forbs (herbs),
grasses, shrubs and trees. Class intervals were selected on
a basis of trial and error to give an approximately normal
distribution of occurrences within crown diameter class
intervals. All estimations were done by an independent
observer.
RESULTS
The results of the crown cover determinations are
given in Table 2.
290
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
TABLE 1. — Number of plant individuals counted with single
character symbol and percentage crown cover
The Fibonacci sequence, where each number is the
sum of the preceding two numbers, provided the closest
resemblance to a normal distribution of occurrences
within crown diameter class intervals. This is illustrated
in Figure 1 with a frequency polygon with the class
intervals on a natural logarithmic scale to reduce the
effect of increasingly larger class intervals.
The class intervals used for mean crown diameters
according to the Fibonacci sequence, are shown in Table
3. Transect lengths were determined by the midpoints of
each class interval.
INTERPRETATION
In Table 2 estimations according to the Domin-Krajina
cover-abundance scale are considerably lower than those
for the single height classes with the most cover. The
plant number scale, in contrast, yielded higher values
than that of the single height class with the most cover
and lower values than the cover of the combined height
classes for each releve, except releve 37. This indicates a
greater precision in estimating cover when using the plant
number scale as opposed to the Domin-Krajina scale.
According to Westfall et al. (1987), quadrat size
should have been larger for the vegetation type repre-
sented by releve 37, but this was not apparent using the
Domin-Krajina scale at the time of sampling. However,
simple summation of the values obtained by the plant
number scale in the field indicated inadequate quadrat
size. It is far too time-consuming to verify quadrat size
for each quadrat according to Westfall et al. (1987). The
plant number scale together with a structural analysis of
the vegetation provides a simple means of verifying
adequacy of quadrat size.
In the frequency polygons (Figure 1) the peaks to the
left of the central troughs for forbs, grasses and shrubs
are caused by a relatively higher proportion of 0,2 m
diameter crowns. This can be attributed to the observer
rounding off crown diameters to 0,2 m some of which
should have fallen into the 0,211 to 0,34 class. If class
intervals had been known at the time of recording, it can
be expected that greater care would have been exercised
in measurements where crown diameters were close to
class borders. The troughs mentioned are, therefore,
considered to be a result of measurement inaccuracies
which could be overcome by using class intervals.
The use of standard transect lengths as illustrated in
Table 3 should simplify transect length determination
and provide for variability in crown size. A further ad-
vantage could be the simultaneous counting of individuals
of different species with similar crown diameters and
spacing to save time. It is also suggested that a simple
counter be used for recording number of individuals for
each species as marking paper for this purpose requires
stopping at each individual recorded.
It must be emphasized that the parameter determined
here is projected crown cover and not projected foliage
cover which is more species and age-dependent.
The class ‘r’ on the Braun-Blanquet scale and *+’ on
the Domin-Krajina scale (Mueller-Dombois & Ellenberg
1974) both with ‘solitary, insignificant cover’ are difficult
to determine. Species with a single occurrence in a sample
quadrat often have significant cover outside the quadrat.
If a stand is defined, as in this study, as 20 ha (Westfall
et al. 1987), it is impracticable to determine whether a
species is ‘solitary’ within that area. The concept of
‘solitary’ is relative to the area defined. In the plant
number scale used here the lowest cover class is less than
0,1 % , which seems better defined than ‘solitary’.
In contrast to the Domin-Krajina scale, the plant num-
ber scale has proportionately finer subdivisions at the
lower cover values of the scale. This is of significance in
the South African context with often high species rich-
ness characterized by many dominant species with
generally lower cover in contrast to the few dominant
species with higher cover often found in the relatively
impoverished European vegetation.
TABLE 2. — Percentage crown cover in five vegetation stands
represented by releves 33 to 37
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
Mean crown diameter In (m)
FIGURE 1. — Frequency polygons of occurrence of plants in
mean crown diameter class intervals for forbs grasses
( ), shrubs and trees ( ). Class intervals
are according to the Fibonacci sequence on a In scale.
CONCLUSIONS
The projected crown cover determinations based on
area estimations and counting of individuals shows
improved precision compared to the Domin-Krajina
cover-abundance scale. Although this method is more
time-consuming than a purely visual estimation of cover,
the use of standard class intervals and a counter should
decrease the time required for cover determinations. The
method appears more suitable for the species-rich South
African vegetation than the traditional European cover-
abundance estimation scales. The method also provides a
means of verifying quadrat size adequacy.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank Dr J.C. Scheepers for comments
and suggestions.
REFERENCES
EDWARDS, D. 1983. A broad-scale structural classification of
vegetation for practical purposes. Bothalia 14: 705-712.
291
TABLE 3. — Class intervals of crown diameters according to the
Fibonacci sequence for determining standard transect
lengths
MUELLER-DOMBOIS, D. & ELLENBERG, H. 1974. Aims and
methods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, London.
WESTFALL, R.H. & PANAGOS, M.D. 1984. A cover meter for
canopy and basal cover estimations. Bothalia 15: 241 —
244.
WESTFALL, R.H., VAN STADEN, J.M. & PANAGOS, M.D.
1987. Predictive species area relations and determination
of subsample size for vegetation sampling in the Transvaal
Waterberg. South African Journal of Botany 53: 44-48.
WESTFALL, R.H. in prep. The vegetation ecology of Sour Bush-
veld in the Transvaal Waterberg.
R.H. WESTFALL and M.D. PANAGOS
MS. received: 1987.07.31.
Bothalia 18,2: 293-304 (1988)
New taxa, new records and name changes for southern African plants
G.E. GIBBS RUSSELL*, W.G. WELMAN*, G. GERMISHUIZEN*, E. RETIEF*, B.J. PIENAAR*, C. REID*,
L. FISH*, J. VAN ROOY*, C.M. VAN WYK*, E. KALAKE** and STAFF*
Keywords: distribution records, floristic inventory, name changes, new taxa, PRECIS, southern Africa
ABSTRACT
Alterations to the inventory of about 24 000 species and infraspecific taxa of bryophytes and vascular plants
in southern Africa are reported for the year 1987. The inventory, as presently maintained in the Taxon compo-
nent of the PRECIS system, contains the accepted name for each taxon, synonyms previously in use as accepted
names during the past half-century, and literature references necessary to identify species in each genus and to
establish the synonymy. The inventory is updated as new research affecting plant classification in southern Africa
is published. During 1987 there were 678 alterations, representing about 2,8% of the total number of taxa.
UITTREKSEL
Daar word vir die jaar 1987 verslag gedoen van veranderings aan die lys van ongeveer 24 000 spesies en infra-
spesifieke taksons van mosse en vaatplante in suidelike Afrika. Die lys, soos dit tans in die Takson-komponent
van die PRECIS-stelsel in stand gehou word, bevat die aanvaarde naam van elke takson, sinonieme voorheen in
gebruik as aanvaarde name gedurende die afgelope halfeeu, en literatuurverwysings wat nodig is om spesies in
elke genus te identifiseer en om sinonimie vas te stel. Die lys word bygewerk soos nuwe navorsing wat plant-
klassifikasie in suidelike Afrika raak, gepubliseer word. Gedurende 1987 was daar 678 veranderings wat ongeveer
2,8% van die totale aantal taksons verteenwoordig.
INTRODUCTION
This is the fourth in this series that reports annual al-
terations to the complete inventory of southern African
plants maintained in the Taxon component of the com-
puter system PRECIS. Previous annual lists of changes
were published in Bothalia 15: 751-759 (1985), 16:
109-118 and 17: 269—275. The format continues to be
that of the List of species of southern African plants,
edn 2, parts 1 & 2 (Gibbs Russell et al. 1985, 1987). The
complete and up-to-date listing of names, literature and
useful synonyms for all the 24000 southern African
plants is continuously maintained in the Taxon compo-
nent of PRECIS, and the plant identification service of
the Botanical Research Institute uses the names as cur-
rently recorded. The Institute can supply PRECIS list-
ings of the most recent species treatment for any family
or genus. In addition, beginning this year, the data files
for the alterations reported in this paper are also available
on floppy disk.
This is the first year since 1985 in which alterations
for all plants have been included. In 1986 and 1987,
while the literature and synonyms for dicotyledons were
being completed, only cryptogams and monocots could
be covered in these annual lists.
Reported alterations for 1987 include 130 newly de-
scribed species or infraspecific taxa, 85 names brought
back into use, and 1 5 species newly reported for south-
ern Africa, resulting in 230 additions to the total list of
species and infraspecific taxa. Six species were removed
because they were mistakenly recorded from southern
* Botanical Research Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001.
** The National Herbarium, P.O. Box 114, Gaborone, Botswana.
Africa, 172 names have gone into synonymy, and there
are 51 new combinations and 27 orthographic correc-
tions. New literature references have been added for 20
genera in which no changes were caused, or for which
no proposed changes were accepted. The total of 678
alterations to the List of species affects about 2,8% of
the southern African flora. The total number of altera-
tions since Taxon-PRECIS began to record synonyms
in 1984 is 1 863 (7,8% of the flora).
Over 1 20 journals are routinely scanned for relevant
papers, and the above changes were reported in 150
articles and books.
The large number of changes exceeds the estimate of
about 500 alterations per year predicted from the mono-
cotyledons alone. Each alteration represents progress in
our understanding of the relationships in the flora, yet
each change is expensive in terms of publications that
must be purchased and the expert manpower necessary
to find, evaluate, record and implement these changes
in herbaria, computer systems and manuscripts. Our
small taxonomic community can ill afford the time
spent on these activities, at the expense of research. The
large number of changes emphasizes the desperate need
for a code of nomenclature that will allow greater stabil-
ity in plant nomenclature.
Besides these routine changes, extensions to Taxon-
PRECIS during the past year include the production of
an index to the 2 000 plates in the first 49 volumes of
Flowering Plants of Africa with the currently accepted
name and synonyms for each plate. In addition, proto-
types are being developed for the expansion of the system
to hold additional information for each species, such as
distribution, life form, habitat, conservation status and
importance to man.
294
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
Spermatophyte families and genera follow the order
and numbering of the Englerian classification system, as
given by Dyer (1975, 1976), with the exception of
Poaceae, which follows an unpublished system of generic
numbering. Bryophytes follow Crosby & Magill (1981)
and Grolle (1983). Pteridophytes follow Schelpe & An-
thony (1986). Species are listed in alphabetical order:
a name in current use appears in capital letters with its
PRECIS number; synonyms appear in lower case letters,
and each synonym is entered twice, once indented below
the name for which it is a synonym and once in its al-
phabetical place in the genus. New collection records
are indicated by quoting a specimen and its locality.
Naturalized taxa are shown by an asterisk following the
name.
Each contributor is acknowledged at the beginning
of the groups for which he is responsible. Although staff
members of the BRI have final responsibility for main-
taining Taxon-PRECIS, we acknowledge with gratitude
co-operation of other botanists in reporting changes.
Mrs B.C. de Wet wrote a number of computer programs
to aid data entry and checking and Mrs J. Mulvenna
slaved over a hot terminal to add all the changes to
PRECIS. Both have helped immeasurably in catching
and eliminating inconsistencies.
REFERENCES
CROSBY, M.R. & MAGILL, R.E. 1981. A dictionary of mosses.
Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis.
DYER, R.A. 1975. The genera of southern African flowering
plants. Vol. 1. Dicotyledons. Botanical Research Institute,
Pretoria.
DYER, R.A. 1976. The genera of southern African flowering
plants. VoL 2. Monocotyledons. Botanical Research In-
stitute, Pretoria.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., REID, C., FISH, L., GERMISHUIZEN,
G., VAN WYK, M., VAN ROOY, J. & STAFF 1987. New
taxa, new records and name changes for southern African
plants. Bothalia 17: 269-275.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., REID, C., VAN ROOY, J. & SMOOK,
L. 1985. List of species of southern African plants, edn 2,
part 1. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa
No. 51.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., WELMAN, W.G., RETIEF, E., IMMELr
MAN, K.L., GERMISHUIZEN, G., PIENAAR, B.J., VAN
WYK, C.M. & NICHOLAS, A. 1987. List of species of
southern African plants, edn 2, part 1. Memoirs of the
Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 56.
GROLLE, R. 1983 . Acta Botanica Fennica 121: 1-62.
SCHELPE, E.A. & ANTHONY, N.C. 1986. Pteridophyta In O. A.
Leistner, Flora of southern Africa. Botanical Research In-
stitute, Pretoria.
STAFF OF THE NATIONAL HERBARIUM 1985. New taxa,
new records and name changes for southern African plants.
Bothalia 15: 751-759.
STAFF OF THE NATIONAL HERBARIUM 1986. New taxa,
new records and name changes for southern African plants.
Bothalia 16: 109-118.
BRYOPHYTA Contributed by J. van Rooy
BRYACEAE (24)
1506
HEPATICAE
OXYMITRACEAE (H7)
1011 -OXYMITRA BISCH.
(Note change In genus number)
SCHISTOCHILACEAE
1121 -SCHISTOCHILA DUM.
(Note spalling correction)
MUSCI
DITRICHACEAE (5)
1338 -ASTOMIOPSIS C. MUELL.
1. MAGILL. 1987. J. BRYOL. 14: 528.
100 A. AMBLYOCALYX C. MUELL.
1339 -CHEILOTHELA LINDB.
1. MAGILL. 1987. J. BRYOL. 14: 528.
100 C. CHILENSIS (MONT.) BROTH.
DICRANACEAE (8)
1371 -AONGSTROEMIOPSIS FLEI5CH .
1. MAGILL. 1987. J. BRYOL. 14= 527.
100 A. JULACEA (DOZ. A MOLK. ) FLEISCH.
GRIMMIACEAE (15)
1443 -LEUCOPEPICHAETIUM MAGILL
(Note spelling correction)
EPHEMERACEAE (18)
1461 -EPHEMEPUM HAMPE
1. MAGILL. 1987. FSA.
200 E. NAMA9UENSE MAGILL
FUNARIACEAE (19)
1467 -FUNARIA HEDW.
1. MAGILL. 1987. FSA.
75 F. CLAVATA (MITT.) MAGILL
F. harveyana Magill = F. SUCCULEATA
450 F. SUCCULEATA (NAGER t WRIGHT) MAGILL
(=F. harveyana Magill) 1
1000 1508 -BRYUM HEDW.
2. MAGILL. 1987. FSA.
ion B. radicals Rehm. ex Dlx. = B. TURBINATUM
2200 B. TURBINATUM (HEDW.) TURN.
(=B. radicals Rehm. ex Dlx.) 2
1121
1301
1331
1356
1441
1461
BARTRAMIACEAE (37) 1581
1581 -BARTRAMIA HEDW.
1. MAGILL. 1987. FSA.
B. afrostrlcta C. Muell. = ANACOLIA BPEUTELII
250 B. COMPACTA HORNSCH. VAR. MACOWANIANA (C.
MUELL.) MAGILL
B. squarrlfolla Sim = ANACOLIA BREUTELII
1583 -BREUTELIA (B.S.G.) SCHIMP.
1. MAGILL. 1987. FSA.
B. afroscoparla (C. Muell.) Par. = B.
SUBSTRICTA
B. breutel 1 1 (C. Muell.) Broth. = ANACOLIA
BREUTELII
500 B. ELLIPTICA MAGILL
650 B. SUBSTRICTA (C. MUELL.) MAGILL
(=B. afroscoparla (C. Muell.) Par.) 1
1584 -PHILONOTIS BRID.
1. MAGILL. 1987. FSA.
P. afrofontana (C. Muell.) Par. var. brevlseta
(C. Muell.) Par. = BREUTELIA
SUBSTRICTA
1585 -ANACOLIA SCHIMP.
1. MAGILL. 1987. FSA.
100 A. BREUTELII (C. MUELL.) MAGILL VAR. BREUTELII
(=Bartramia afrostricta C. Muell.) 1
(=Breutel1a breutelli (C. Muell.)
Broth . ) 1
200 A. BREUTELII (C. MUELL.) MAGILL VAR.
SOUARRIFOLIA (SIM) MAGILL
(=Bartram1a squarrlfolla Sim) 1
1466
1588 -QUATHLAMBA MAGILL
1. MAGILL. 1987. FSA.
100 Q. DEBILICOSTATA MAGILL
RHACHITHECIACEAE (40A)
1606
1606 -RHACHITHECIUM BROTH. EX LE'JOL.
(Note spelling correction)
1471 -PHYSCOMITRIUM (BRID.) BRID.
1. MAGILL. 1987. FSA.
300 P. SPATHULATUM (HORNSCH.) C. MUELL. VAR.
SESSILE (SHAW) MAGILL
ORTHOTRICHACEAE (42)
1616 -AMPHIDIUM SCHIMP.
1. MAGILL 4 VAN ROOY. MS. FSA.
1616
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
295
100
200
1623
100
A. cyathlcarpum (Mont.) Broth. = A. TORTUOSUM 9901043
A. LAPPONICUM (HEDW.) SCHXMP.
A. TORTUOSUM (HORNSCH.) ROBINS.
(=A. cyathlcarpum (Mont.) Broth.) 1
-ORTHOTRICHUM HEDH.
O. mirum Lewinsky
STONEOBRYUM MIRUM
-CARDOTIELLA VITT
1. VITT. 1961. J. HATTORI BOT. LAB. 49: 101.
C. SECUNDA (C. MUELL.) VITT
-STONEOBRYUM NORRIS 4 ROBINS.
1. NORRIS 4 ROBINS. 1981. BRYOLOGIST 64= 96.
s. Mirum (Lewinsky) norris a robins.
(=Orthotr1chura mirum Lewinsky) 1
LEUCOOONTACEAE (49)
1686 9901142
-LEUCODON SCHWAEGR.
2. MAGILL 4 VAN ROOY. MS. FSA.
L. ASSIMILIS (C. MUELL.) JAEG.
(=L. capensls Schlmp. In Ran.) 2
L. capansl* Schlmp. In Ran. = L. ASSIMILIS
METEORIACEAE (58)
-SOU AMID IUM (C. MUELL.) BROTH.
2. MAGILL 4 VAN ROOY. MS. FSA.
S. biforma (Hampa) Broth. = S. BRASILIENSE
S. BRASILIENSE (HORNSCH.) BROTH.
(=S. biforma (Hampa) Broth.) 2
(=S. rahmannl 1 (C. Mugll.) Broth.) 2
S. rahmannl 1 (C. Muall.) Broth. = S.
BRASILIENSE
NECKERACEAE (60)
-PINNATELLA FLEISCH.
(Nota spalling corractlon)
HOOKERIACEAE (65)
1781
1781 -CALLICOSTELLA (C. MUELL.) MITT. Southarn
African spaclas moved to
SCHIZOMITRIUM
C. applanata Broth, A Bryhn = SCHIZOMITRIUM
TRISTE
C. trlstls (C. Muall.) Broth. = SCHIZOMITRIUM
TRISTE
1785 -DISTICHOPHYLLUM DOZ. 4 MOLK.
2. MAGILL A VAN ROOY. MS. FSA.
200 0. MNIIFOLIUM (HORNSCH.) SIM VAR. MNIIFOLIUM
300 D. MNIIFOLIUM (HORNSCH.) SIM VAR. TAYLORII
(SIM) MAGILL
(=0. taylor 1 1 Sim) 1
D. taylor 11 Sim = 0. MNIIFOLIUM VAR. TAYLORII
1792 -SCHIZOMITRIUM B.S.G.
1. MAGILL 4 VAN ROOY. MS. FSA.
100 S. TRISTE (C. MUELL.) 0CHYRA
< =Ca 1 1 1 coite 1 la applanata Broth. A
Bryhn. ) 1
( =Call (costal la trlstls (C. Muall.)
Broth.) 1
-PSEUD OBRACH I ARIA LAUNERT
3. CLAYTON A PENVOIZE. 1986. GEN. GPAM.
4. WEBSTER. 1987. AUSTR. PANICEAE.
Treatment of this genus In Brachlarla by
Clayton and In Urochloa by Webster shows
the unsatisfactory state of generic
delimitation In Panlceae.
-UROCHLOA BEAUV.
3. WEBSTER. 1987. AUSTR. PANICEAE.
Several African species currently
treated in Panlcura and Brachlarla were
transferred to Urochloa by Webster.
Study of all our species will bo
required before these Isolated changes
can be adopted.
-ORYZIDIUM C.E. HUBB. 4 SCHWEICK.
(Note author change for genus)
-PANICUM L.
4. WEBSTER. 1987. AUSTR. PANICEAE.
-TRICHOLAENA SCHULT.
(Note author change for genus)
-EHRHARTA THUNB.
2. GIBBS RUSSELL. 1984. BOTHALIA 15: 145 4
149.
3. GIBBS RUSSELL. 1987. BOTHALIA 17= 191-
194.
E. STIPOIDES LABILL. *
Australasian species collected In Natal.
2930 (Pietermaritzburg) Karkloofi wattle
plantation (-AD), T. Collins, Nov. 1970
(NH).
E. THUNBERGII GIBBS RUSSELL
(=E. vlrgata Launert ) 3
E. virgata Launert = E. THUNBERGII
-CENTROPODIA REICHB.
(Note correction In genus number)
-MERXMUELLERA C0NERT
3. CLAYTON 4 RENVOIZE. 1986. GEN. GRAM.
Inclusion of this genus In Rytldosperma
Is not yet accepted pending study of
generic limits with Pentaschlstls.
9902044 -KARROOCHLOA CONERT 4 TUERPE
3. CLAYTON 4 RENVOIZE. 1986. GEN. GRAM.
Inclusion of this genus In Rytldosperma
is not yet accepted pending study of
generic limits.
9902611
THUIDIACEAE (72)
1832
100
-LEPTOTERIGYNANDRUM C. MUELL.
1. MAGILL. 1987. J. BRY0L. 14:
L. AUSTROALPINUM C. MUELL.
-STIPAGPOSTIS NEES
(Note correction In genus number)
9902630 -STIPA L.
Stlpa trlchotoma Nees = NASELLA TRICHOTOMA
9902631 NASELLA DESV.
1. CARO. 1966. KURTZIANA 3: 79.
2. CLAYTON 4 RENVOIZE. 1986. GEN. GRAM.
100 N. TRICHOTOMA (NEES) HACK. EX ARECH.
(=St1pa trlchotoma Nees) 2
9902970 -BRACHYACHNE (BENTH.) STAPF
(Note author change for genus)
9903330 -LEPTOCHLOA BEAUV.
3. CLAYTON 4 RENVOIZE. 1986. GEN. GRAM.
This reference now Includes Olplachne as
a section of Laptochloa.
ANGIOSPERMAE
-LEPTOCARYDION STAPF
(Note author change for genus)
MONOCOTYLEDONAE Contributed by C. Reid
POACEAE Contributed by L. Fish 9900010
9900310 -ROTTBOELLIA L.F.
50 R. COCHINCHINENSIS (LOUR.) CLAYTON
(=R. exaltata L.F.) 1
R. exaltata L. F. = R. COCHINCHINENSIS
9900370 -IMPERATA CYR.
(Note author change for genus)
9900490 -VETIVERIA BORY
(Note author change for genus)
9900810 -DIHETEROPOGON (HACK.) STAPF
(Note author change for genus)
9901040 -BRACHIARIA (TRIN.) GRISEB.
4. WEBSTER. 1987. AUSTR. PANICEAE.
-0IPLACHNE BEAUV.
5. PHILLIPS. 1982. KEW BULL. 37: 133.
6. CLAYTON 6 RENVOIZE. 1986. GEN. GPAM.
This genus Is retained because It Is
still recognized at sectional level when
Included In Leptochloa.
-LOPHACME STAPF
(Note corrected spalling)
-STIBURUS STAPF
3. CLAYTON 4 RENVOIZE. 1986. GEN. GRAM.
Our species are retained In this genus
and not transferred to Eragrostls.
-Las 1 ochloa Kunth = TRIBOLIUM
(Note corrected author citation)
-Plaglochloa Adamson 4 Sprague = TRILOBIUM
(Note corrected author citation)
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
296
9904040 -BRIZA L.
3. MATTHEI . 1975. WILLDENOWIA, 8= 79.
4. CLAYTON 4 RENVOIZE 1986. GEN. GRAM.
300 B. SUBARISTATUM LAM.
( =Chascolytrum subar istatura (Lam.)
Desv . ) 4
220 K. ALBOMONTANA BAIJNATH 5
550 K. BRUCEAE (CODO) CODD
(=K. praecox Bak. subsp. bruceae Codd ) 4
K. praecox Bak. subsp. bruceae Codd = K.
BRUCEAE
3300 K. PRAECOX. BAK
9904041 -Chascolytrum Desv.
C. subarlstatum (Lam.) Desv. = BRIZA
SUBARISTATUM
9904150 -PUCCINELLIA PARL.
100 P. ACROXANTHA C.A. SMITH 4 C.E. HUBS.
200 P. ANGUSTA (NEES) C.A. SMITH 4 C.E. HUBB.
(Note corrected author citation for both
species )
9904250 -Pseudobromus K. Schum. = FE5TUCA
(Note corrected author citation)
CYPERACEAE
452000
0459000 -CYPERUS L.
2950 C. INVOLUCRATUS ROTTB.
Tropical African species collected In
Natal. 2732 (Sordwana Bay) (-AB), Van
Wyk 948> Kluge 2640.
0459010
1300
-PYCREUS BEAUV.
P. MUNDII NEES
(Note orthographic change)
046500 -FICINIA SCHRAD.
4250 F. PETROPHILA ARNOLD 4 GORDON-GRAY
(Note orthographic correction)
0467000 -FUIRF.NA ROTTB.
5. FORBES. 1987. S. AFR. J. BOT. 53: 185.
ERIOCAULACEAE 828000
0828000 -ERIOCAULON L.
550 E. DREGEI HOCHST. VAR. SONQERIANUM (KOERN.)
OBERM.
(Note orthographic change)
LILIACEAE 942000
1026000
3000
3050
3700
3720
5550
6550
6600
6650
9720
14070
14090
14100
-ALOE L.
6. GLEN 4 HARDY. 1987. FLOWER. PL. AFR. 49.
7. GLEN 4 HARDY. 1987. S. AFR. J. BOT. 52:
489.
A. barbertonlae Pole Evans = A. GREATHEADII
VAR. DAVYANA
A. CHORTOLIRIOIDES VAR. CHORTOLIRIODES BERGER
A. CHORTOLIRIOIDES BERGER VAR. WOOL LIANA (POLE
EVANS) GLEN 4 HARDY
(=A. woolliana Pole Evans ) 7
A. COOPERI BAK. SUBSP. COOPERI
A. COOPERI BAK. SUBSP. PULCHRA GLEN 4 HARDY
A. davyana Schonl. var. davyana = A.
GREATHEADII VAR. DAVYANA
A. davyana Schonl. var. subollfera Groenewald =
A. GREATHEADII VAR. DAVYANA
A. FOURIEI HARDY 4 GLEN
A. grad Ilf lora Groenewald = A. GREATHEADII
VAR. DAVYANA
A. GREATHEADII SCHONL. VAR. DAVYANA (SCHONL.)
GLEN 4 HARDY
(=A. barbertonlae Pole Evans) 7
(=A. davyana Schonl. var. davyana) t
(=A. davyana Schonl. var. subollfera
Groenewald) ft
(=A. graciltflora Groenewald) 7
(=A. longibracteata Pole Evans) 7
(=A. mutans Reynolds) 7
(=A. verdoornlae Reynolds) 7
A. GREATHEADII SCHONL. VAR. GREATHEADII
A. HARDYI GLEN
A. karasbergensls PI Hans = A. STRIATA SUBSP.
KARASBER5ENSIS
A. komaggasensis Krltzinger 4 v. Jaarsveld =
A. STRIATA SUBSP. KOMAGGASENSIS
A. longibracteata Pole Evans = A. GREATHEADII
VAR. DAVYANA
A. MARLOTHII BERGER SUBSP. ORIENTALIS GLEN 4
HARDY
A. mutans Reynolds = A. GREATHEADII VAR.
DAVYANA
A. STRIATA HAW. SUBSP. KARASBERGENSIS (PILLANS)
GLEN 4 HARDY
( =A . karasbergensls PI llans) 7
A. STRIATA HAW. SUBSP. KOMAGGASENSIS
(KRITZINGER 4 V. JAARSVELD)
GLEN 4 HARDY
(=A. komaggasensis Krltzinger 4 v.
Jaarsveld) 7
A. STRIATA HAW. SUBSP. STRIATA
A. verdoornlae Reynolds = A. GREATHEADII VAR.
0AVYANA
A. woolliana Pole Evans = A. CHORTOLIRIOIDES
VAR. WOOLLIANA/
1027000 -GASTERIA DUVAL
2. V. JAARSVELD. 1987. CACT. 4 SUCC. JL
(U.S. ) 59: 170.
7050 G. VLOKII V. JAARSVELD
1079000 -ALBUCA L.
6. HILLIARD 4 BURTT. 1984. NOTES ROY. BOT.
GARD. EOINB. 42: 227.
650 A. BATTENIANA HILLIARD 4 BURTT
5020 A. RUPESTRIS HILLIARD 4 BURTT
5050 A. SCHLECHTERI BAK.
(Note change In species number)
6000 A. XANTHOCODON HILLIARD 4 BURTT
1080000 -URGINEA STEINH.
4. HILLIARD 4 BURTT. 1984. NOTES ROY. BOT.
GARD. EDINB. 42: 227.
450 U. CALCARATA (BAK.) HILLIARD 4 BURTT
3150 U. SANIENSIS HILLIARD 4 BURTT
0985000 -BULBINE WILLD.
5. V. JAARSVELD 4 BAIJNATH. 1987. S. AFR. J.
BOT. 53: 424.
6. BAIJNATH. 1987. S. AFR. J. BOT. 53: 4 27.
980 B. ESTERHUYSENIAE BAIJNATH
2820 B. STRIATA BAIJNATH 4 V. JAARDVELD
0985010 -TRACHYANDRA KUNTH
4750 T. SALTII (BAK.) OBERM. VAR. OATESII (BAK.)
OBERM.
(Note change In species number)
1012000 -ERIOSPERMUM JACQ. EX HILL0.
#'. PRE HERBARIUM PRACTICE, FOLLOWING PERRY
2220 E. CORYMBOSUM BAK. #
1024000 -KNIPHOFIA MOENCH
4. CODD. 1987. BOTHALIA 17: 185.
5. BAIJNATH. 1987. S. AFR. J. BOT. 53: 307.
1098000
420
1380
2050
2250
2420
2710
2970
-LACHENALIA JACQ. F. EX MURRAY
9. BARKER. 1987. S. AFR. J. BOT. 53= 166.
10. MULLER-DOBLIES ET AL. 1987. S. AFR. J.
BOT. 53: 481.
L. BARKERIANA U. MULLER-DOBLIES, B. NORD. 4 D.
MULLER-DOBLIES
L. DEHOOPENSIS W.F. BARKER
L. KLIPRANDENSIS W.F. BARKER
L. LEOMONTANA W.F. BARKER
L. MACGREGORIORUM W.F. BARKER
(Note orthographic correction)
L. MINIMA W.F. BARKER
L. NAMIBIENSIS W.F. BARKER
1113000 -ASPARAGUS L.
A. vlrgatus Bak. = PROT ASPARAGUS VIRGATUS
1113010 -PROT ASPARAGUS OBERM.
4. OBERMEYER. 1937. FL. AUSTRALIA 46: 494.
297
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
6600 P. VIRGATUS (BAK.) OBEPM.
(^Asparagus virgatus Bak.) 5
AMARYLLIDACEAE 1166000
1191000 -CYRTANTHUS L. F.
3050 C. ROTUND XLOB'JS N.E. BR.
1970000 -UPERA GAUDICH.
3. FRIIS, IMMELMAN A WILMOT-DEAR . 1907.
NORD. J. BOT. 7: 125-126.
U. cameroonensis Wedd. = U. TRINERVIS
200 U. TRINERVIS (HOCHST. APUD KRAUSS ) FRIIS 4
IMMELMAN
(=U. cameroonensis Wedd.) 3
IRIDACEAE
1259000
1261000 -ROMULEA MARATTI
2. DE VOS. 1907. S. AFR. J. BOT. 53: 247.
9350 R. UNIFOLIA DE VOS
1301000 -HESPERANTHA KER-GAWL.
0. GOLDBLATT. 1907. S. AFR. J. BOT. 53= 959.
730 H. ELSIAE GOLDBL.
(Note change in species number)
750 H. ERECTA (BAK.) BENTH . EX BAK.
(Note change in species number)
H. pilosa (L. f.) Ker-Gawl. subsp. latifolta
Goldbl. = H. PSEUDOPILOSA
2013000 -DROGUETIA GAUDICH.
2. FRIIS, IMMELMAN & WILMOT-DEAR. 1907.
NORD. J. BOT. 7: 125-126.
D. burchelli 1 N.E. Br. = D. INERS SUBSP.
BURCHELLII
150 D. INERS ( FORSSK. ) SCHWEINF. SUBSP. BURCHELLII
(N.E. BR.) FRIIS & WILMOT-DEAR
( =D . burchel 1 i 1 N.E. Br . ) 2
175 0. INERS (FORSSK.) SCHWEINF. SUBSP. INERS
2019000 -AUSTRALINA GAUDICH.
A. ( ntegr (folia Wedd. = DIDYMODOXA CAPENSIS
VAR. INTEGRIFOLIA
2600 H. PILOSA ( L.F. ) KER-GAWL.
2620 H. PSEUDOPILOSA GOLDBL.
(=H. pilosa (L. f.) Ker-Gawl. subsp.
latifolta Goldbl. ) 0
2950 H. TERETIFOLIA GOLDBL.
3050 H. TRUNCATULA GOLDBL.
3100 H. UMBRICOLA GOLDBL.
ORCHIDACEAE
1309000
1922000 -HABENARIA WILLD.
#. PRE HERBARIUM PRACTICE, FOLLOWING
MANNING.
1300 H. FILICORNIS LINDL. #
2050 H. SUBARMATA REICHB. F. #
2019010
100
300
900
-DIDYMODOXA WEDD.
2. FRIIS, IMMELMAN A WILMOT-DEAR. 1907.
NORD. J. BOT. 7: 125-126.
0. CAFFRA (THUNB.) FRIIS A WILMOT-DEAR
D. CAPENSIS (L. F.) FRIIS 4 WILMOT-DEAR VAR.
CAPENSIS
(=Urtica capensis L. f.) 2
0. CAPENSIS (L. F.) FRIIS 4 WILMOT-DEAR VAR.
INTEGRIFOLIA (WEDD.) FRIIS A
WILMOT-DEAR
(=Australina integrifolia Wedd.) 2
(=D. integrifolia (Wedd.) Wedd.) 2
D. integrifolia (Wedd.) Wedd. = 0. CAPENSIS
VAR. INTEGRIFOLIA
PROTEACEAE Contributed by C.M. van Wyk
2016000
1990000 -CORYCIUM SWARTZ
1000 C. OROBANCHOIOES (L. F.) SWARTZ
(Note author change)
2030000 -AULAX BERG.
1. ROURKE. 1907. S-AFR. TYDSKR. PLANTK.
53(6): 969.
2093000
1690000 -EULOPHIA R. BR. EX LINDL.
#. PRE HERBARIUM PRACTICE, FOLLOWING HALL.
E. barbata (Thunb.) Spreng. = ACROLOPHIA
CAPENSIS VAR. LAMELLATA
E. barbata sensu H. Bol. non (Thunb.) Spreng. =
E. CLAVICORNIS VAR. NUTANS
000 E. CLAVICORNIS LINDL. VAR. NUTANS (SOND.) A.V.
HALL
( =E . barbata sensu H. Bol. non (Thunb.)
Spreng . ) S
2093000 -VISCUM L.
2. GILBERT, POLHILL 4 WIENS. 1905. NORD. J.
BOT. 5: 229.
V. nervosum Hochst. ex A. Rich. = V. TRIFLOPUM
SUBSP. NERVOSUM
1950 V. TRIFLORUM DC. SUBSP. NERVOSUM (HOCHST. EX A.
RICH. ) M. GILBERT
(=V. nervosum Hochst. ex A. Rich.) 2
POLYGONACEAE Contributed by G. Germishuizen 2109000
DICOTYLEDONAE
SALICACEAE Contributed by G. Germishuizen 1072000
and B.J. Pienaar
1073000
570
590
600
700
000
-SALIX L.
1. IMMELMAN. 1907. BOTHALIA 17,2: 171-177.
S. capensis Thunb. = S. MUCRONATA SUBSP.
CAPENSIS
S. hirsuta Thunb. = S. MUCRONATA SUBSP.
HIRSUTA
S. MUCRONATA THUNB. SUBSP. CAPENSIS (THUNB.)
IMMELMAN
(=S. capensis Thunb.) 1
S. MUCRONATA THUNB. SUBSP. HIRSUTA (THUNB.)
IMMELMAN
<=S. hirsuta Thunb. ) 1
S. MUCRONATA THUNB. SUBSP. MUCRONATA
S. MUCRONATA THUNB. SUBSP. WILMSII (SEEMEN)
IMMELMAN
(=S. wilmsii Seemen) 1
S. MUCRONATA THUNB. SUBSP. WOOOII (SEEMEN)
IMMELMAN
(=3. wood 11 Seemen) 1
S. wi lm.si 1 Seemen = S. MUCRONATA SUBSP.
WILMSII
S. woodii Seemen = S. MUCRONATA SUBSP. WOODII
URTICACEAE Contributed by G. Germishuizen 1979000
and B.J. Pienaar
1979000 -URTICA L.
U. capensis L. f. = DIDYMODOXA CAPENSIS VAR.
CAPENSIS
2201000
2150
2200
-POLYGONUM L.
2. GERMISHUIZEN. 1906. BOTHALIA 16,2: 232.
P. senegalense Meisn. forma albotomentosum R.A.
Grah . = P. SENFGALENSE SUBSP.
ALBOTOMENTOSUM
P. SENEGALENSE MEISN. SUBSP. ALBOTOMENTOSUM
(R.A. GPAH . ) GERMISHUIZEN
(=P. senegalense Meisn. forma
albotomentosum R.A. Grah.) 2
P. SENEGALENSE MEISN. SUBSP. SENEGALENSE
2209000 -OXYGOHUM BURCH.
2. GERMISHUIZEN. 1907. BOTHALIA 17,1: 90-91.
3. GERMISHUIZEN. 1907. BOTHALIA 17,2: 105-
107.
100 O. ALATUM BURCH. VAR. ALATUM
150 O. ALATUM BUPCH. VAR. LONGISQUAMATUM
GERMISHUIZEN
1050 0. ROBUSTUM GERMISHUIZEN
CHENOPODIACEAE Contributed by G. Germishuizen 2219000
and B.J. Pienaar
2223000 -CHENOPODIUM L.
2. AELLEN. 1920. FEDDES REPRIUM 29: 337-397.
298
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
AMARANTHACEAE Contributed by B.J. Pienaar 2289000 BRUNIACEAE Contributed by C.M. van Wyk 3283000
2299000 -AMARANTHUS L.
2. AELLEN. 1964. FL. EUROP. l: 109.
250 A. CAUDATUS L. *
AIZOACEAE Contributed by B.J. Pienaar 2374000
2376000 -LIMEUM L.
5. FRIEDRICH. 1954. MITT. BOT. STAATSAM.
MUNCHEN 11-20: 134-1654.
2800 L. VISCOSUM (GAY) FENZL SUBSP. TRANSVAALENSE
FRIEDR.
2395000
130
150
160
175
-TRIANTHEMA L.
2. GQNCALVES. 1978. FL. ZAM. 4: 517.
T. PORTULACASTPUM L.
T. SALSOLOIDES FENZL EX OLIV. VAR. SALSOLOIDES
T. SALSOLOIDES FENZL EX OLIV. VAR. STENOPHYLLA
ADAMSON
T. SALSOLOIDES FENZL EX OLIV. VAR.
TRANSVAALENSIS (SCHINZ) ADAMSON
MESEMBRYANTHEMACEAE Contributed by G. Germi shui zen 2405001
and B.J. Pienaar
2405036 -DINTERANTHUS SCHWANT.
*. PRE HERBARIUM PRACTICE, FOLLOWING
KILLICK.
600 D. VANZYLII (L. BOL. ) SCHWANT.
(=0. vanzylil (L. Bol.) Schwant. var.
llneatus Jacobsen) 2
(=L1thops vanzylil L. Bol.) 1
D. vanzylil (L. Bol.) Schwant. var. llneatus
Jacobsen = D. VANZYLII
(Note orthographic change for
"vanzy 1 1 1 " )
2405066
5350
21300
21400
-LAMPRANTHUS N.E. BR.
2. GLEN. 1978. UNPUBL. PH.D. THESIS. UNIV.
CAPE TOWN
L. caespltosus (L. Bol.) N.E. Br. var.
caespltosus = L. TEGENS
L. caespltosus ( L. Bol.) N.E. Br . var.
luxurlans (L. Bol.) Jacobsen =
L. TENUIFOLIUS
L. DELTOIDES (L.) WIJNANDS
(Note author correction)
L. TEGENS (F. MUELL. ) N.E. BR.
(=L. caespltosus (L. Bol.) N.E. Br. var.
caespltosus) 2
L. TENUIFOLIUS (L.) SCHWANT.
(=L. caespitosus (L. Bol.) N.E. Br. var.
luxurlans (L. Bol.) Jacobsen) 2
3290000
200
ROSACEAE
3375000
125
250
300
425
450
470
850
3388000
1530
1630
1650
5172
9920
10830
-STAAVIA OAHL
#. PRE HERBARIUM PRACTICE, FOLLOWING POWRIE.
S. CAPITELLA (THUNB.) SOND .
( =S . capltella Sond.) It
(-S. comosa Colozza) *
(=S. rupestris Eckl. & Zeyh.) #
S. capltella Sond. = S. CAPITELLA
S. comosa Colozza = S. CAPITELLA
S. rupestris Eckl. t Zeyh. = S. CAPITELLA
Contributed by B.J. Pienaar 3316000
and C.M. van Wyk
-ALCHEMILLA L.
2. HAUMAN & BALLE. 1936. MEM. ACAD. BELG.
SVO. SER. II VOL. 16. FASC.
320: 20-21.
3. ROTHMALER. 1937. REPERT. SP. NOV. REGNI
VEGET XLII : 122-123.
4. ROSS. 1972. FL. NATAL: 183.
5. MENDES. 1978. F. ZAM. 4: 29-33.
6. HILLIARD & B'JRTT. 1986. NOTES R. BOT.
GDN EDINB. 43: 370.
A. BICARPELLATA POTHM.
A. COLURA HILLIARD
A. CRYPTANTHA STEUD.
(=A. inyangensis Welm. ) 5
A. ELONGATA ECKL. t ZEYH. VAR. PLATYLOBA ROTHM.
A. GALPINII HARM, i BALLE
A. HIRSUTO-PETIOLATA (DE WILD.) ROTHM.
A. Inyangensis Weim. = A. CRYPTANTHA
A. SCHLECHTERANA ROTHM.
-CLIFFORTIA L.
6. WEIMARCK. 1953. BOT. NOTISER 106,1= 78-
80.
7. WEIMARCK. 1959. BOT. NOTISER 112,1: 73-
79.
C. CERVICORNU WEIM.
C. CONCINNA WEIM.
C. CRASSINERVIS WEIM.
C. INCANA WEIM.
C. SUBDURA WEIM.
C. VERRUCOSA WEIM.
3391000 -GRIELUM L.
4. ADAMSON & SALTER. 1950. FL. CAPE PENIN.:
452.
150 G. GRANDIFLORUM (L.) DRUCE
(=G. tenulfollum L. ) 4
250 G. HUMIFUSUM THUNB. VAR. PARVIFLORUM HARV.
G. tenui f ol 1 urn L. = G. GRANDIFLORUM
FABACEAE Contributed by G. Germishuizen 3426000
2405069 -LITHOPS N.E. BR.
1. BOLUS. 1937. NOTES MESEM. 3= 75.
2. COLE. 1980. NAT. CACT. & SUCC . J. (U.K.)
35,3: 75.
6250 L. MENNELLII L. BOL.
6550 L. NAUREENIAE COLE
L. vanzylil L. Bol. = DINTERANTHUS VANZYLII
3454000 -PROSOPIS L.
3. BURKART. 1976. J. ARNOLD ARBOR. 57= 219.
150 P. GLANDULOSA TORR. VAR. TORREYANA (BENSON)
JOHNSTON *
3646000 -COELIDIUM VOGEL EX WALP.
2. GRANBY. 1987. NORD . J. BOT. 7,1: 51-52.
350 C. FLAVUM GRANBY
2405073
50
450
1505
2950
3975
4150
-MESEMBRYANTHEMUM L.
##. PRE HERBARIUM PRACTICE, FOLLOWING
BITTRICH t OEHN (HAMBURG)
M. AGINOSUM L. BOL.
M. ALKALIFUGUM DINT.
M. FASTIGIATUM THUNB.
M. LONGISTYLUM DC.
M. PINGUE L.
M. PUSILLUM HERRE
PORTULACACEAE Contributed by B. J. Pienaar 2406000
2407000 -CALANDRINIA *
1. SCOGGAN. 1978. FL. CANADA 3= 666.
100 C. CILIATA (R. i P. ) DC.
(=C. cillata DC. var. menzlesil (Hook.)
Macb . ) 1
C. cillata DC. var. menzlesil (Hook.) Macb. =
C. CILIATA
RANUNCULACEAE Contributed by G. Germishuizen 2521000
and B.J. Pienaar
254 8 0 0 0
150
-THALICTRUM L.
T. MINUS L.
(Note change In species number)
DROSERACEAE Contributed by G. Germishuizen 3133000
and B.J. Pienaar
3136000 -DROSERA L.
4. CHEEK. 1987. KEW BULL. 42: 738.
1750 D. SLACKII M.R. CHEEK
3657000 -LOTONONIS (DC.) ECKL. t ZEYH.
6. VAN WYK. 1987. S. AFR. J. BOT. 53,2: 161-
165.
1450 L. BREVICAULIS B.-E. VAN WYK
3698000 -LOTUS L.
2. BALL. 1986. FLORA EUPOPEA 2= 175.
L. hlspldus Desf. = L. SUBBIFLORUS
530 L. SUBBIFLORUS LAG. *
(=L. hispldus Desf.) 2
3702000
9650
11950
18750
21230
-INDIGOFERA L.
7. JARVIE t STIRTON. 1986. BOTHALIA 16,2=
230.
8. JARVIE & STIRTON. 1987. BOTHALIA 17,1: 1-
6.
9. GERMISHUIZEN. 1987. 17,1: 33-34.
I. GIFBERGENSIS C.H. STIRTON & J.K. JARVIE
I. IONII J.K. JARVIE t C.H. STIRTON
I. RUBROGLANDULOSA GERMISHUIZEN
I. THESIOIOES J.K. JAPVIE & C.H. STIRTON
3718000
250
300
350
-TEPHROSIA PERS.
5. SCHRIRE. 1987. BOTHALIA 17, l: 7-15.
T. aemula (E. Mey.) Harv. = T. MACROPODA VAR.
DIFFUSA
T. AEQUILATA BAK. SUBSP. AUSTRALIS BRUMMITT
T. ALBISSIMA H.M. FORBES SUBSP. ALBISSIMA
T. ALBISSIMA H.M. FORBES SUBSP. ZULUENSIS (H.M.
FORBES) B.D. SCHRIRE
( =T. uni f ol 1 a H.M. Forbes) 5
(=T. zuluensls H.M. Forbes) 5
T. angustlsslma Engl. = T. LONGIPES SUBSP.
LONGIPES VAR. LONGIPES
T. aplculata H.M. Forbes = T. NATALENSIS
SUBSP. NATALENSIS
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
650 T. BRUMMITTII B.O. SCHRIRE
T. dawsonli Bak. f. = T. LONGIPES SUBSP.
L0NGIPE5 VAR. LONGIPES
T. diffusa (E. Hey.) Harv. = T. MACROPODA VAR.
DIFFUSA
3400 T. GLOMERULI FLORA MEISN. SUBSP. GLOMERULI FLORA
3450 T. GLOME PULI FLORA MEISN. SUBSP. MEISNERI
(HUTCH, 4 BURTT DAVY) B.D.
SCHRIRE
3470 T. GOBENSIS BRUMMITT
4400 T. LONGIPES MEISN. SUBSP. LONGIPES VAR.
LONGIPES
(=T. angustlssima Engl.) 5
(=T. dawsonl 1 Bak. f.) 5
(=T. lurlda Sond. var . drummondli
Brummltt) 5
(=T. lurlda Sond. var. lissocarpa
Brummltt) 5
(=T. lurlda Sond. var. lurlda) 5
T. lurlda Sond. var. drummondli Brummltt = T.
LONGIPES SUBSP. LONGIPES VAR.
LONGIPES
T. lurlda Sond. var. lissocarpa Brummitt = T.
LONGIPES SUBSP. LONGIPES VAR.
LONGIPES
T. lurlda Sond. var. lurlda = T. LONGIPES
SUBSP. LONGIPES VAR. LONGIPES
4650 T. MACROPODA (E. MEY.) HARV. VAR. DIFFUSA (E.
MEY. ) B.D. SCHRIRE
(=T. aemula (E. Mey.) Harv.) 5
( -T. diffusa (E. May.) Harv.) 5
4700 T. MACROPODA (E. MEY.) HARV. VAR. MACPOPODA
T. medley 1 H.M. Forbes = T. SHILUWANENSIS
T. natalensls H.M. Forbes = T. NATALENSIS
SUBSP. NATALENSIS
5200 T. NATALENSIS H.M. FORBES SUBSP. NATALENSIS
(=T. aplculata H.M. Forbes) 5
(=T. natalensls H.M. Forbes) 5
5250 T. NATALENSIS H.M. FORBES SUBSP. PSEUDOCAPITATA
(H.M. FORBES) B.D. SCHRIRE
(=T. pseudocap 1 tata H.M. Forbes) 5
T. pseudocapl tata H.M. Forbes = T. NATALENSIS
SUBSP. PSEUDOCAPITATA
7400 T. SHILUWANENSIS SCHINZ
(=T. medleyi H.M. Forbes) 5
(=T. spathacea Hutch. 4 Burtt Davy) 5
( =T. wy 1 1 e 1 H.M. Forbes) 5
T. spathacea Hutch. 6 Burtt Davy = T.
SHILUWANENSIS
T. unifolia H.M. Forbes = T. ALBISSIMA SUBSP.
ZULUENSIS
T. wy 1 lei H.M. Forbes = T. SHILUWANENSIS
T. zuluensls H.M. Forbes = T. ALBISSIMA SUBSP.
ZULUENSIS
3773000
100
3670000
650
750
-ORNITHOPUS L.
1. BALL. 1968. FL. EUROP. 2: 182.
O. SATIVUS BR0T. SUBSP. SATIVUS *
-ERYTHRINA L.
3. FRANKLIN-HENNESSY. 1985.
4. FRANKLIN-HENNESSY. 1986. BOTHALIA 16,1:
48.
E. X DYERI E.F. FRANKLIN-HENNESSY
E. X JOHNSONII E.F. FRANKLIN-HENNESSEY
-PUERARIA DC.
2. OHWI . 1985. AGRIC. UNIV. WAC-ENINGEN
PAPERS 85, l: 43.
P. LOBATA (WILLD.) OHWI VAR. LOBATA *
(=Dolichos hlrsutus Thunb.) 2
7000 -RHYNCHOSIA LOUR.
4. GERMISHUIZEN. 1987. BOTHALIA 17,2: 181-
182.
2270 R. EMARGINATA GERMISHUIZEN
4750 R. NYASICA BAK.
Tropical African species collected In
Botswana. 1725 (Livingstone): Lesomo
(- CC), P. A. Smith 14 April 1983.
- Contributed by E. Kalake
000 -DOLICHOS L.
D. hlrsutus Thunb. = PUERARIA LOBATA VAR.
LOBATA
GERANIACEAE
Contributed by C.M. van Wyk
3924000
3440
5230
-PELARGONIUM L'HERIT.
15. VORSTER. 1986. S. AFR. J. BOT. 52(4):
383-384.
16. N0R0ENSTAM. 1987. PL. SY5T . EVOL. 155:
333-337.
17. VORSTER. 1987. S. AFR. J. BOT. 53(1): 65-
70.
18. VORSTER. 1987. S. AFR. J. BOT. 53(1): 71-
74.
19. VORSTER. 1987. S-AFR. TYDSKR. PLANTK .
53(2): 184-185.
P. CAROLI-HENPICI B. NORD .
P. DIVISIFOLIUM VORSTER
9930
10720
16500
17053
LINACEAE
3947000
299
P. fumarioides L'Herlt. ex Harvey = P. MINIMUM
P. malacoldes Knuth = P. NANUM
P. MINIMUM VORSTER
(=P. fumarioides L'Herlt. ex Harvey) 19
P. NANUM L'HERIT.
(=P. humifusum Willd.) 15
(=P. malacoldes Knuth) 15
l=P. parvulum DC.) 15
(=P. procumbens (Andr.) Pers.) 15
P. parvulum DC. =' P. NANUM
P. procumbens (Andr.) Pers. = P. NANUM
P. sanlculaef ollum Willd. = P. TABULARE
P. TABULARE (BURM. F.) L'HERIT.
(=P. saniculaef olium Willd.) 5
(Note author change for species)
P. TRAGACANTHOIDES BURCH.
Contributed by E. Retlef
3943000
-HUGONIA L.
2. ROBSON 6 GONCALVES. 1969. FL M0CAM3 .
(LINACEAE): 4.
H. busseana Engl. = H. ORIENTALIS
H. OPIENTALIS ENGL.
<=H. busseana Engl.) 2
ZYGOPHYLLACEAE
Contributed by E. Retlef
>000 -ZYGOPHYLLUM L.
3. RETIEF . 1987. BOTHALIA 17: 189.
1625 Z. MACROCARPON RETIEF
SIMAROUBACEAE
Contributed by E. Retlef
-KIRKIA OLIV.
2. IMMELMAN. 1966. FSA 18: 1.
PTAEROXYLACEAE
Contributed by E. Retief
4157000 -PTAEROXYLON ECKL. 4 ZEYH.
2. WHITE 4 STYLES. 1986. FSA 18= 35.
MELIACEAE Contributed by E. Retlef
4163000 -ENTANDPOPHRAGMA C. DC.
2. WHITE 4 STYLES. 1986. FSA 18= 59.
4168000 -NYMANIA LINDL.
2. WHITE 4 STYLES. 1986. FSA 18: 39.
4171000 -TURRAEA L.
3. WHITE 4 STYLES. 1986. FSA 18: 41.
400 T. STREYI PENNINGTON 4 F. WHITE
4175000 -MELIA L.
2. WHITE 4 STYLES. 1986. FSA 18: 49.
4193000 -EKEBERGIA SPARRM.
2. WHITE 4 STYLES. 1986. FSA 18: 51.
4195000 -TRICHILIA P. ER.
2. WHITE 4 STYLES. 1986. FSA 18: 53.
4195010 -PSEUDOBERSAMA VERDC.
2. WHITE 4 STYLES. 1986. FSA 18: 57.
MALPHIGIACEAE
Contributed by E. Retlef
000 -TRIASPIS BURCH.
2. IMMELMAN. 1986. FSA 181 63.
000 -SPHEDAMNOCARPUS PLANCH. EX BENTH . 4 HOOK. F.
3. DE VILLIEPS 4 BOTHA. 1986. FSA 18: 66.
S. angolensis (Juss.) Planch, ex Ollv. = S.
PPUPIENS SUBSP. PPUPIEN5
S. galphiml Ifollus (Juss.) Szyszyl. subsp.
galphlml Ifolius = S. PRUPIENS
SUBSP. GALPHIMIIFOLIUS
S. ga lphi mi i f ol i us (Juss.) Szyszyl. subsp.
rehmannil (Szyszyl.) Launert =
S. PRURIENS SUBSP.
GALPHIMIIFOLIUS
450 S. PRURIENS (JUSS.) SZYSZYL. SUBSP.
GALPHIMIIFOLIUS (JUSS.) DE
VILLIEPS 4 C.J. BOTHA
(=S. ga lphi ml 1 f o 1 1 us (Juss.) Szyszyl.
subsp. rehmannil (Szyszyl.)
Launert ) 3
(=S. galphl ml 1 f ol 1 us (Juss.) Szyszyl.
subsp. galphlml Ifolius ) 3
(=S. rehmannil Szyszyl.) 3
(=S. woodianus Arenes ) 3
500 S. PRURIENS (JUSS.) SZYSZYL. SUBSP. PRURIENS
(=S. angolensis (Juss.) Planch, ex
Oliv. ) 3
<=S. prurlens (Juss.) Szyszyl. var.
lanceolatus Launert) 3
(=S. prurlens (Juss.) Szyszyl. var.
lat i f ol tus Engl . ) 3
(=S. wllmsii Engl. ) 3
300
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
S. prurtens (Juss.) Szyszyl. var. lanceolatus
Launert = S. PRURIENS SUBSP.
PRURIENS
S. prurlens (Juss.) Szyszyl. var. latlfolius
Engl. = S. PRURIENS SUBSP.
PRURIENS
S. rehmannH Szyszyl. = S. PRURIENS SUBSP.
GALPHIMIIFOLIUS
600 S. TRANSVAALICUS (KUNTZE) BURTT DAVY
S. wl lms ( 1 Engl. = S. PRURIENS SUBSP. PRURIENS
S. woodianus Arenes = S. PRURIENS SUBSP.
GALPHIMIIFOLIUS
4220000 -ACRIDOCARPUS GUILL. 4 PERR.
2. IMMELMAN. 1986. FSA 10: 69.
100 M. LUGARDIAE N.E. BR.
CELASTRACEAE Contributed by E. Retlef 4618000
4626000 -MAYTENUS MOLINA
4. VAN WYK 4 ARCHER. 1987. S. AFR. J. BOT.
53: 155.
1050 M. OLEOSA VAN WYK & ARCHER
4629000 -CATHA FORSSK. EX SCOP.
4. VAN WYK 2 PRINS. 1987. S. AFR. J. BOT.
53: 202.
50 C. ABBOTTII VAN WYK 4 PRINS
VITACEAE Contributed by E. Retlef
4909000
4917000 -RHOICISSUS PLANCH.
3. URTON, OLIVIER 4 ROBERTSON. 1986. S. AFR.
J. BOT. 52: 589.
R. clrrhlflora sonsu G1 lg 4 Brandt p.p. excl.
syn. Rhus clrrhlflora L. f. =
R. TRIDENTATA SUBSP. TRIDENTATA
R. cunelfolla (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Planch. = R.
TRIDENTATA SUBSP. CUNEIFOLIA
R. erythrodes (Fresn.) Planch. = R. TRIDENTATA
SUBSP. CUNEIFOLIA
550 R. TRIDENTATA (L. F.) WILD & DRUM. SUBSP.
CUNEIFOLIA (ECKL. * ZEYH.) N.R.
URTON
(=C(ssus cunelfolla Eckl. 4 Zeyh.) 3
(=R. cunelfolla (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Planch.)
3
(=R. erythrodes (Fresn.) Planch.) 3
600 R. TRIDENTATA (L. F.) WILD 4 DRUM. SUBSP.
TRIDENTATA
t=R. clrrhlflora sensu Gllg & Brandt
p.p. excl. syn. Rhus
cirrhlf lora L. f . ) 3
4918000 -CISSUS L.
C. cunelfolla Eckl. & Zeyh. = RHOICISSUS
TRIDENTATA SUBSP. CUNEIFOLIA
STERCULIACEAE Contributed by E. Retlef
5044000
5056000 -HERMANNIA L.
5. DE WINTER. 1986. NOTES R. BOT. GDN EDINB.
43: 401.
5350 H. CORDATA (E. MEY. EX PHILL. ) DE WINTER
CLUSIACEAE Contributed by E. Retlef 5162000
5168000 -HYPERICUM L.
2. WIGHT 4 ARN. 1834. PRODR. 99.
350 H. HOOKERANUM WIGHT & APN
THYMELAEACEAE Contributed by E. Retlef 5429000
5435000 -GNIDIA L.
19. HILLIARD 6 BURTT. 1986. NOTES R. BOT. GDN
EDINB. 43: 218.
250 G. BURCHE LLII ( MEISN . ) GILG
( =Las1os1phon burchellll Melsn.) 4
5320 G. RENNIANA HILLIARD 4 BURTT
5435010 -Lasleslphon Freson. = GNIDIA
L. burchellll Melsn. = GNIDIA BUPCHELLII
5436000 -STRUTHIOLA L.
4. PETERSON 4 HILLIARD. 1986. NOTES R. BOT.
GDN EDINB. 43: 219.
125 S. ANGUSTILOBA PETERSON 4 HILLIARD
5461000 -PASSERINA L.
2. HILLIARD 4 BURTT. 1987. THE BOTANY OF THE
SOUTHERN NATAL DRAKENSBERG 233.
250 P. DRAKENSBERGENSIS HILLIARD 4 BURTT
IMMELMAN
950 N. LUEDERITZII KOEHNE FORMA HEREROENSIS KOEHNE
1000 N. LUEDERITZII KOEHNE FORMA LUEDERITZII
1450 N. SAGITTIFOLIA ( SOND . ) KOEHNE VAR. ERICIFORMIS
KOEHNE
N. sallcifolla H.B.K. = HEIMIA SALICIFOLIA
1900 N. SCHINZII KOEHNE
<=N. schlnzll Koehne var. fleckll
Koehne ) #
<=N. schlnzll Koehne var. rehmannll
Koehne ) #
N. schlnzll Koehne var. fleckll Koehne - N.
SCHINZII
N. schlnzll Koehne var. rehmannll Koehne = N.
SCHINZII
5487000 -HEIMIA LINK 4 OTTO
2. KOEHNE. 1903. PFLANZENREICH 17: 241.
200 H. SALICIFOLIA (MONTI) LINK 4 OTTO
(=Nesaea sallcifolla H.B.K.) 2
COMBRETACEAE Contributed by E. Retlef 5536000
5538000 -COMBRETUM LOEFL.
9. EXELL. 1978. FZ 4: 100-160.
1800 C. KRAUSSII HOCHST.
(=C. nelsonll Duemmer ) 9
C. nelsonll Duemmer = C. KRAUSSII
MYRTACEAE Contributed by E. Retlef 5553000
5558000 -MYRTUS L.
1. CAMPBELL. 1968. FL. EUROP. 2: 303.
100 M. COMMUNIS L. *
TRAPACEAE Contributed by E. Retlef 5829000
5829000 -TRAPA L.
2. VERDCOURT. 1986. KEW BULL. 41: 447.
100 T. NATANS L. VAR. PUMILA NAKANO EX VERDC.
ARALIACEAE Contributed by E. Retlef 5839000
5872000 -CUSSONIA THUNB.
5. REYNEKE 4 KOK. 1987. A. AFR. J. BOT. 53:
317.
400 C. PANICULATA ECKL. 4 ZEYH. VAR. PANICULATA
450 C. PANICULATA ECKL. 4 ZEYH. VAR. SINUATA
REYNEKE 4 KOK
APIACEAE Contributed by E. Retlef 5893000
5992000 -HETEROMORPHA CHAM. 4 SCHLECTD .
5. TOWNSEND. 1985. KEW BULL. 40= 843-849.
250 H. PAPILLOSA C.C. TOWNSEND
6013000 -DEVERRA DC.
2. PFISTERER 4 PODLECH. 1986. MITT. BOT.
MUNCHEN 22: 571.
O. aphylla (Cham. 4 Schlechtd.) DC. = D.
DENUDATA SUBSP. APHYLLA
300 0. DENUDATA (VIV) PFISTERER 4 POOL. SUBSP..
APHYLLA (CHAM. 4 SCHLECHTD.)
PFISTERER 4 PODL.
(=D. aphylla (Cham. 4 Schlechtd.) DC.) 2
( =Pituranthos aphyllus (Cham. 4
Schlechtd.) Benth. 4 Hook. f.
ex Schlnz) 2
6013010 -Pituranthos = DEVERRA
P. aphyllus (Cham. 4 Schlechtd.) Benth. 4 Hook.
f. ex Schlnz = DEVERRA
DENUDATA SUBSP. APHYLLA
6016010 -DRACOSCIADIUM HILLIARD 4 BURTT
1. HILLIARD 4 BURTT. 1986. NOTES R. BOT. GDN
EDINB. 43: 220.
100 O. ITALAE HILLIARD 4 BURTT
200 0. SANICU LI FOLIUM HILLIARD 4 BURTT
6045000 -POLEMANNIA ECKL. 4 ZEYH.
4. HILLIARD 4 BURTT. 1986. NOTES R. BOT. GDN
EDINB. 43: 225.
350 P. SIMPLICIOR HILLIARD 4 BURTT
6116000 -PEUCEDANUM L.
2950 P. THODEI ARNOLD
(Note orthographic correction)
ERICACEAE Contributed by E. Retlef
6179000
LYTHRACEAE Contributed by E. Retlef
5473000 -ROTALA L.
9. COOK. 1979. BOISSIERA 29: 9-133.
700 R. MEXICANA CHAM. 4 SCHLECHTD.
5486000 -NE3AEA COMM. EX JUSS.
#. PRE HERBARIUM PRACTICE, FOLLOWING
5473000 6237000 -ERICA L.
24. OLIVER. 1984. S. AFR. J. BOT. 3,5: 268-
270.
25. DAVIDSON. 1985. S. AFR. J. BOT. 51: 71-
73.
26. HILLIARD 4 BURTT. 1985. NOTES R. BOT. GDN
EDINB. 42: 240-245.
27. OLIVER. 1986. BOTHALIA 16: 35-38.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
559S0 E. REVOLUTA (H. BOL.) L.E . DAVIDSON.
(=E. subvert 1 c 11 lar f s Diels ex Guth.
var. revoluta H. Bol.) 25
E. subvertlcl Haris Diels ex Guth. var.
revoluta H. Bol. = E. REVOLUTA
6296000 -COILOSTIGMA KLOTZSCH
2. OLIVER. 1987. BOTHALIA 17= 163.
C. dregeanum Klotzsch = C. ZEYHERIANUM VAR.
ZEYHERIANUM
C. tenulfollum Klotzsch = C. ZEYHERIANUM VAR.
TENUIFOLIUM
300 C. ZEYHERIANUM KLOTZSCH VAR. TENUIFOLIUM
(KLOTZSCH) E.G.H. OLIVER
<=C. tenulfollum Klotzsch) 2
900 C. ZEYHERIANUM KLOTZSCH VAR. ZEYHERIANUM
(=C. dregeanum Klotzsch) 2
SAPOTACEAE Contributed by E. Retlef 63S3000
6368000 -SIDEROXYLON L.
2. HEMSLEY . 1966. KEW BULL. 20: 972.
100 S. INERME L. SUBSP. INERME
6386010 -MANILKARA ADANS.
3. VAN WYK. 1982. S. AFR. J. B0T. 1: 33.
EBENACEAE Contributed by E. Retlef 6903000
6909000 -EUCLEA MURRAY
3. RETIEF . 1966. BOTHALIA 16: 220.
550 E. 0EWINTERI RETIEF
APOCYNACEAE Contributed by E. Retlef 6599000
6562000 -LANDOLPHIA BEAUV.
L. capensls Ollv. = ANCYCLOBOTRYS CAPENSIS
L. peterstana (Klotzsch) T.-Dyer =
ANCYCLOBOTRYS PETERSIANA
6562020 -ANCYCLOBOTRYS PIERRE
1. KUPICHA. 1985. FZ 7,2: 422.
100 A. CAPENSIS ( OLIV. ) PICHON
(=Landolph1a capensls Ollv.) 1
200 A. PETERSIANA (KLOTZSCH) PIERRE
(=Landolph1a peterslana (Klotzsch) T.-
Dyer ) 1
301
325 C. GEOMETRICUM BAK. & C.H. NR.
(=C. lanceolatum Forssk. subsp.
geometrlcum (Bak. & C.H. Nr.)
Brand) 3
C. lanceolatum Forssk. subsp. geometrlcum (Bak.
A C.H. Nr. ) Brand = C.
GEOMETRICUM
7072000 -Tysonla H. Bol. = AFROTYSONIA
T. afrlcana H. Bol. = AFROTYSONIA AFRICANA
T. glochidiata R. Mill = AFROTYSONIA
GLOCHIDIATA
7072010 -AFROTYSONIA RAUSCHERT
1. MILL. 1986. NOTES R. BOT. GDN EDINB.
43,3: 467-475.
100 A. AFRICANA (H. BOL.) RAUSCHERT
(=Tyson1a afrlcana H. Bol.) 1
200 A. GLOCHIDIATA (R. MILL) R. MILL
(=Tyson1a glochidiata R. Mill) 1
VERBENACEAE
Contributed by N.G. Welman
PERIPLOCACEAE Contributed by E. Retlef
6729000
6747000 -RAPHIONACME HARV.
6. VENTER & VERHOEVEN. 1906. S. AFR. J. BOT.
52: 332.
7. VENTER A VERHOEVEN. 1987. S. AFR. J. BOT.
53: 177.
350 R. ELSANA VENTER 6 VERHOEVEN
925 R. NAMIBIANA VENTER A VERHOEVEN
ASCLEPIADACEAE Contributed by E. Retlef
6752000
6870000 -BRACHYSTELMA R. BR.
2. FORSTER. 1986. BOTHALIA 16: 227.
200 B. BARBEPAE HARV. EX HOOK. F.
350 B. BREVIPEDICELLATUM TUPRILL
B. caudatum (Thunb.) N.E. Br . = B. TUBEROSUM
5850 B. TUBEROSUM (MEERBURG) R. BR. EX SIMS
(=B. caudatum (Thunb.) N.E. Br . ) 2
6885000 -STAPELIA L.
1. LEACH. 1985. EXCELXA, TAX. SER. Z- 1-157.
4420 ?S. GIGANTEA N.E. BR. X 09BE0PSIS CAUDATA (N.E.
BR) LEACH
(=S. tarantuloldes R.A. Dyer) 1
4420 ?S. GIGANTEA N.E. BR. X ORBEOPSIS LUTEA (N.E.
BR) LEACH
(=S. tarantuloldes R.A. Dyer) 1
S. tarantuloldes R.A. Dyer = S. GIGANTEA X
ORBEOPSIS CAUDATA
S. tarantuloldes R.A. Dyer = S. GIGANTEA X
ORBEOPSIS LUTEA
B0RAGINACEAE
Contributed by W.G. Helman
7038000
7148000 -PLEXIPUS PAFIN.
1. FERNANDES. 1984. BOLM SOC BROTERIANA 57:
265-273.
150 P. CAESPITOSUS (H. PEARSON) R. FERNANDES
(=Bouchea caespltosa H. Pearson) 1
1600 P. SCHLECHTERI (GUERKE) R. FERNANDES VAR.
SCHLECHTERI
7148020 -Bouchea Cham. Southern African species moved
to PLEXIPUS
B. caespltosa H. Pearson = PLEXIPUS
CAESPITOSUS
B. schlechter 1 Guerke = PLEXIPUS SCHLECHTERI
VAR. SCHLECHTERI
7148030 -Chascanum E. Mey. = PERIPLEXUS
C. schlechter 1 (Guerke) Moldenke = PLEXIPUS
SCHLECHTERI VAR. SCHLECHTERI
SOLANACEAE
Contributed by W.G. Welman
7000 -SOLANUM L.
13. HEPPER & JAEGER. 1986. KEW BULL. 41,2=
433-435.
S. hermannl 1 auctt. = S. LINNAEANUM
3750 S. LINNAEANUM HEPPER A JAEGER
(=S. hermannl 1 auctt.) 13
( =S. sodomeum auctt.) 13
S. sodomeua auctt. = S. LINNAEANUM
SCRQPHULARIACEAE
Contributed by W.G. Welman
7472000 -HEMIMERIS L. F.
100 H. CENTRODES HIERN
( =H. nana Diels ) 3
300 H. MONTANA L. F.
(=H. pachyceras Diels) 3
(=H. racenosa (Houtt.) Merrill) 3
H. nana Diels = H. CENTRODES
H. pachyceras Diels - H. MONTANA
H. racemosa (Houtt.) Merrill - H. MONTANA
7476000 -NEMESIA VENT.
9. HILLIARD A BURTT. 1986. NOTES R. BOT. GDN
EDINB. 43,3: 385-400.
200 N. ALBIFLORA N.E. BR.
(=N. flanaganll Hlern) 9
1500 N. CAERULEA HIERN
1800 N. DENTICULATA (BENTH.) FOURC .
<=N. natalltla Sond.) 9
N. flanaganll Hlern = N. ALBIFLORA
N. frutlcans (Thunb.) Benth. var. linearis
(Vent.) Norllndh = N. LINEAPIS
2600 N. GLABRIUSCULA HILLIARD A BURTT
3850 N. LINEARIS VENT.
(=N. Frutlcans (Thunb.) Benth. var.
linearis (Vent.) Norllndh) 9
N. natalltla Sond. = N. DENTICULATA
5400 N. RUPICOLA HILLIARD
5550 N. SILVATICA HILLIARD
5700 N. UM60NATA (HIERN) HILLIARD A BURTT
(=Diclis umbonata Hiern) 9
7043000 -EHRETIA P. BR.
150 E. OBTUSIFOLIA HOCHST. EX DC.
Tropical African species collected In
Botswana. 16211 Andara ) : Xaru, P.A. Smith
26 February 1984. -Contributed by E.
Kalake .
7064000 -CYNOGLOSSUM L.
3. HILLIARD A BURTT. 1986. NOTES R. BOT. GDN
EDINB. 43,3: 345-350.
25 C. ALTICOLA HILLIARD A BURTT
75 C. AUSTROAFRICANUM HILLIARD A BURTT
(=C. austroafricanum Welm. nomen nudum)
3
C. austroafr Icanura Walm. nomen nudum = C.
AUSTROAFRICANUM
7477000
-OICLIS BENTH.
0. umbonata Hlern
NEMESIA UMBONATA
19000 -SUTERA ROTH
16. HILLIARD A BURTT. 1986. NOTES R. BOT. GDN
EDINB. 43,2: 216-217.
1900 S. BEVERLYANA HILLIARD A BURTT
10450 S. SILENIOIDES HILLIARD
58000 -LIMOSELLA L.
3. HILLIARD A BURTT. 1986. NOTES R. BOT. GDN
EDINB. 43,2: 212-216.
L. capensls auct. - L. GRANDIFLORA
400 L. GRANDIFLORA BENTH.
(=L. capersfs auct.) 3
302
450 L. INF LATA HI LLIAPD i BURTT
700 L. VESICULOSA HILLIARD & BURTT
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
6352020 -Dinocanthium Bren. = PYROSTRIA
D. hystrix Brent. = PYROSTRIA HYSTRIX
SELAGINACEAE 7566000
7571000 -AGATHELPIS CHOISY
3. WIJNANDS. 1983. BOT. COMMELINS.
100 A. DUBIA (L.) HUTCH. EX WIJNANDS
(Note author correction)
SCROPHULARIACEAE Contributed by W.G. Welman 7460000
7597000 -MELASMA BERG.
M. barbatum HI ern = ALECTRA SESSILIFLORA VAR.
SESSILIFLORA
M. sessi lif lorum (Vahl) Hlern = ALECTRA
SESSILIFLORA VAR. SESSILIFLORA
7597010 -ALECTRA THUN3 .
1. MELCHOIR . 1941. NOTIZBL. BOT. GAPD. HUS.
BERL. 15: 4 27.
2. HEPPER. 1960. KEW BULL. 14: 405.
A. barbata (Hlern) Melch. = A. SESSILIFLORA
VAR. SESSILIFLORA
A. me lampyro i des Benth. - A. SESSILIFLORA VAR.
SESSILIFLORA
1870 A. SESSILIFLORA (VAHL) KUNTZE VAR. SESSILIFLORA
(=A. barbata (Hlern) Melch.) 2
(=A. melampyroides Benth.) 2
(=Melasma barbatum Hlern) 2
(^Melasma sess 1 1 1 f lorum (Vahl) Hlern) 1
7627000
900
1150
1250
1500
1600
1650
-HARVEYA HOOK.
4. HILLIARD i BURTT. 1986. NOTES R. BOT. GDN
EDINB. 43,3: 377-384.
H. crlspula Conrath = H. RANDII
H. HUTTONII HIE9N
H. LEUCOPHARYNX HILLIARD » BURTT
H. PULCHRA HILLIARD t BURTT
H. RANDII HIERN
( =H . crlspula Conrath) 4
H. SCARLATINA (BENTH.) HIEPN
(=Aulaya scarlatina Benth.) 4
H. SILVATICA HILLIARD t BURTT
7627010 -Aulaya Harv . = HARVEYA
A. scarlatina Benth. = HARVEYA SCARLATINA
ACANTHACEAE Contributed by W.G. Welman 7906000
6007000 -ASYSTASIA BLUME
5. EDWARDS t GETLIFFE NORRIS. 1987. S. AFR.
J. BOT. 53,3: 231-233.
350 A. PINGUIFOLIA T.J. EDWARDS
8026000
365
367
368
-PERISTROPHE NEES
5. BALKWILL ET AL. 1986. S.
52,6: 513-520.
6. BALKWILL ET AL. 1988. S.
54,1: 47-54.
P. KOTSCHYANA NEES
P. NAMIBIENSIS BALKWILL SU3SP.
BALKWILL
P. NAMIBIENSIS BALKWILL SUBSP.
AFR. J. BOT.
AFR. J. BOT.
BRANDBERGENSIS
NAMIBIENSIS
8031000 -DICLIPTERA JUSS.
6. BALKWILL t BALKWILL. 1988. S. AFR. J.
BOT. 54,1: 55-59.
330 D. FIONAE BALKWILL
8094010 -MONECHMA HOCHST.
2. MUNDAY. 1987. S. AFR. J. BOT. 53,2: 140-
142.
550 M. CALLOTHAKNUM J. MUNDAY
RUBIACEAE Contributed by W.G. Welman 8119000
8308000
500
510
520
-TRICALYSIA A. RICH.
4. ROBBRECHT. 1987. BULL. JARD . BOT. NAT.
BELG. 57: 180-187.
T. CAPENSIS ( MEISN. EX HOCHST.) SIM VAR.
CAPENSIS
( =Bunburya capensls Melsn. ex Hochst.) 4
T. CAPENSIS (MEISN. EX HOCHST.) SIM VAR.
GALPINII (SCHINZ) ROBBRECHT
(=T. galpinii Schinz) 4
T. CAPENSIS (MEISN. EX HOCHST.) SIM VAR.
TRANSVAALENSIS ROBBRECHT
T. galplnll Schinz = T. CAPENSIS VAR. GALPINII
8308030 -Bunburya Melsn. = TRICALYSIA
B. capensls Melsn. ex Hochst. = TRICALYSIA
CAPENSIS VAR. CAPENSIS
8352000 -CANTHIUM LAM.
9. TILNEY t KOK. 1987. S. AFR. J. BOT. 53,1:
98-102.
10. BPIDSON. 1987. KEW BULL. 42,3= 634.
C. guetnzil Sond. = KEETIA GUEINZII
1100 C. SETIFLORUM HIERN SUBSP. SETIFLORUM
1400 C. VANWYKII TILNEY t KOK
8352050 -KEETIA PHILL.
1. BRIDSON. 1986. KEW BULL. 41,4: 970-971.
100 K. GUEINZII (SOND.) BRIDSON
(=Canthium gueinzil Sond.) 1
(=K. transvaalensls Ph ill.) 1
K. transvaalensls Phi 11. = K. GUEINZII
8355000 -PYROSTRIA COMMERS. EX JUSS.
1. BPIDSON. 1987. KEW BULL. 42,3: 629-630.
100 P. HYSTRIX (BREM.) BRIDSON
< =Dinocanthium hystrix Brern. ) 1
8467000 -HYDROPHYLAX L. F. Southern African species
moved to PHYLOHYDRAX
H. carnosa (Hochst.) Sond. = PHYLOHYDRAX
CARNOSA
8467010
100
-PHYLOHYDRAX PUFF
1. PUFF. 1986. PL. SYST. EVOL. 154: 343-366.
P. CARNOSA (HOCHST.) PUFF
< =Hydrophylax carnosa (Hochst.) Sond.) 1
VALERIANACEAE Contributed by W.G. Welman 8527000
8532000
100
200
300
-VALERIANA L.
2. BURTT. 1986. NOTES R. BOT. GDN EDINB.
43,3: 402-405.
V. CAPENSIS THUMB . VAR. CAPENSIS
V. CAPENSIS THUMB. VAR. LANCEOLATA N.E. BR.
V. CAPENSIS THUN3 . VAR. NANA B.L. BURTT
DIPSACACEAE Contributed by W.G. Welman 8539000
8541000 -CEPHALARIA ROEM. * SCH'JLT.
3. BURTT. 1986. NOTES R. BOT. GDN EDINB.
43,3: 366.
500 C. GALPINIANA SZABO SUBSP. GALPINIANA
550 C. GALPINIANA SZABO SUBSP. SIMPLICIOR B.L.
BURTT
CAMPANULACEAE Contributed by W.G. Welman 8644000
8668000
650
2750
3650
5450
8350
9300
9350
12650
-WAHLENBEPGIA SCHRAD. EX ROTH
9. TUYN. 1981. MITT. BOT. STSAMML. , MUNCH.
17: 239-242.
10. HILLIARD i BURTT. 1986. NOTES R. BOT. GDN
EDINB. 43,2: 195-198.
11. HILLIARD * BURTT. 1986. NOTES R. BOT. GDN
EDINB. 43,3: 350-352.
12. THULIN. 1987. NORD. J. BOT. 7,3: 261.
W. APPRESSIFOLIA HILLIARD t BURTT
W. CUSPIDATA V. BREHM.
(=W. dentifera v. Brehrn. ) 10
(=W. furcata v. Brehm. ) 10
W. dentifera v. Brehm. = W. CUSPIDATA
W. DOLERITICA HILLIARD * BURTT
W. furcata v. Brehm. = W. CUSPIDATA
W. HIRSUTA (EDGEW.) TUYN
( =Cepha lost Irma hlrsutum Edgew.) 9
W. PALLIDIF LORA HILLIARD t BURTT
W. POLYTRICHIFOLIA SCHLTR . SUBSP.
POLYTRICHIFOLIA
W. POLYTRICHIFOLIA SCHLTR. SUBSP. DRACOMONTANA
HILLIARD t BURTT
W. TETRAMERA THULIN
8669000 -Cephalostigma A. DC. Southern African
species moved to WAHLENBERGIA
C. hlrsutum Edgew. = WAHLENBERGIA HIRSUTA
ASTERACEAE Contributed by W.G. Welman 8729000
8764000 -CORYMBIUM L.
250 C. ENERVE MARKOTTER
(Note species mistakenly omitted from
Edn 2,2)
8992000 -GNAPHALIUM L.
1000 G. PAUCIF LORUM DC.
(Note species mistakenly omitted from
Edn 2,2)
9006000 -HELICHRYSUM MILL.
2. HILLIARD. 1986. NOTES R. BOT. GDN EDINB.
43,2: 198.
H. altlcolum H. Bol. var. montanum H. Bol. =
H. EVANSII
5775 H. EVANSII HILLIARD
(=H. altlcolum H. Bol. var. montanum H.
Bol.) 2
9037000
600
2600
-STOEBE L.
S. CINEREA (L.) THUNB.
(=Ser1ph1ua clnereum L. ) 1
S. RUGULOSA HARV.
(Note species mistakenly omitted from
Edn 2,2)
303
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
9037010 -Serlphtum L. = ELYTROPAPPUS , STOEBE
S. clnereum L. = STOEBE CINEREA
9053000 -MACOWANIA OLIV.
250 M. DEFLEXA HILLIARD & BURTT
(Note species mistakenly omitted from
Edn 2,2)
9339000 -MATRICARIA L.
M. pilifera Thell. = CYMBOPAPPUS PILIFERUS
M. zuurbergensls Oliv. = HILLIARDIA
ZUURBERGENSIS
9339020
100
9391000
9391090
900
9357000
000
9366000
1975
9905010
9906000
900
9911000
10150
11650
126S5
19900
-HILLIARDIA B. NORD.
1. NORDENSTAM. 1987. OPERA BOT. 92: 197-151.
H. ZUURBERGENSIS (OLIV.) B. NORD.
< =Matr Icarla zuurbergensls Oliv.) 1
-CHRYSANTHEMUM L.
C. laslopodum Hutch. = CYMBOPAPPUS PILIFERUS
-CYMBOPAPPUS B. NORD.
2. NORDENSTAM. 1987. OPERA BOT. 92: 197-151.
C. lasiopodus (Hutch.) B. Nord. = C. PILIFERUS
C. PILIFERUS (THELL.) B. NORD.
( =Chrysanthemum laslopodum Hutch.) 2
( =Cymbopappus laslopodus (Hutch.) B.
Nord. ) 2
(=Matricaria pilifera Thell.) 1
-H1PPIA L.
9. HUTCHINSON. 1918. KEW BULL. 5: 179-182.
5. COMPTON. 1990. JL S. AFR. BOT. 6= 60.
6. MEPXMULLER. 1951. MITT. BOT. STSAMML. •
MUNCH, l: 79.
H. TRILOBATA HUTCH.
-PENTZIA THUMB.
8. NORDENSTAM. 1987. BOT. JAHR3 . SYST. 108:
195.
P. PfcDUNCULARIS B. NORD.
-CRASSOCEPHALUM MOENCH
C. bojeri (DC.) Robyns = SOLANECIO ANGULATUS
C. subscandens (A. Rich.) S. Moore = SOLANECIO
ANGULATUS
-CINERARIA L.
9. JEFFREY. 1986. KEW BULL. 91,9: 930-931.
C. DELTOIDEA SOND .
(=C. monticola Hutch.) 9
C. monticola Hutch. = C. DELTOIDEA
C. cissampelina DC. = MIKANIOPSIS CISSAMPELINA
-SENECIO L.
36. HUTCHINSON. 1917. ANN. S. AFR. MUS. 9,6:
398-399.
37. HILLIARD A BURTT. 1986. NOTES R. BOT. GDN
EDINB. 93,2: 198-199.
38. HILLIARD A BURTT. 1986. NOTES R. BOT. GDN
EDINB. 93,3: 352-353.
39. JEFFREY. 1986. KEW BULL. 91,9: 903.
S. cephalophorus (Compt.) Jacobs. = KLEINIA
CEPHALOPHOPA
S. clssampelinus (DC.) Sch. Blp. = MIKANIOPSIS
CISSAMPELINA
S. dinterl Muschl. ex Dlnter = EMILIA
AMBIFARIA
S. FLANAGANII PHILL.
S. fulgens (Hook, f.) Nlch. = KLEINIA FULGENS
S. galpini i (Hook. f. = KLEINIA GALPINII
S. GREGATUS HILLIARD
(=S. serratuloldes DC. var. dleterlenll
Thell. ) 38
( =S. serratuloldes DC. var. gracilis
Harv. ) 38
(=S. serratuloldes DC. var. holubll
Thell. ) 38
(=S. serratuloldes DC. var. rehmannll
Thell. ) 33
S. HOCHSTETTERI SCH. BIP. EX A. RICH.
S. hookerlanus Jacobsen = KLEINIA FULGENS
S. llmosus O. Hoffra. = EMILIA LIMOSA
S. longiflorus (DC.) Sch. Bip. = KLEINIA
L0NC-IFL0RA
S. marlothianus O. Hoffm. = EMILIA MARLOTHIANA
S. mlkanioldes Otto ex Harv. - DELAIREA
ODORATA
S. PEARSQNII HUTCH.
S. scandens DC. - DELAIPEA ODORATA
S. schinzll O. Hoffm. = EMILIA AMBIFARIA
S. serratuloldes DC. var. dleterlenll Thell. =
S. GREGATUS
S. serratuloldes DC. var. gracilis Harv. = S.
GREGATUS
S. serratuloldes DC. var. holubll Thell. = S.
GREGATUS
S. serratuloldes DC. var. rehmannli Thell. =
S. GREGATUS
S. stapell Ifornls Phlll. = KLEINIA
STAPELIIFORMIS
9911010
50
100
150
300
900
9911020
9911030
9911050
100
200
300
900
500
9911080
100
9911090
100
9911100
100
9911110
100
9920000
2750
7050
S. tenellulus S. Moore = EMILIA TENELLULA
S. transvaalensis H. Bol. = EMILIA
TPANSVAALENSIS
S. vl r 1 d 1 f lorus Hutch. = EMILIA MARLOTHIANA
S. we lwl tsch 1 1 O. Hoffm. = KLEINIA FULGENS
-EMILIA CASS.
2. JEFFREY. 1986. KEW BULL. 91,9: 903-920.
#. PRE HERBARIUM PRACTICE, FOLLOWING WELMAN.
E. a lbocostata Hlern = E. MARLOTHIANA
E. AMBIFARIA (S. MOORE) C. JEFFREY
( =Othonna amblfaria S. Moore) 2
( =Othonna polycephala Klatt) *
(=Othonna rosea Klatt) S
(=Senec1o dlnteri Muschl. ex Dlnter) •
(=Senecio schinzii O. Hoffm.) 2
E. LIMOSA (O. HOFFM.) C. JEFFREY
(=Senec1o llmosus O. Hoffm.) 2
E. MARLOTHIANA (O. HOFFM.) C. JEFFREY
(=E. albocostata Hlern) 9
( =Othonna glauca Klatt) S
(=Senecio marlothianus O. Hoffm.) 2
( =Senec o vl r 1 d 1 f lorus Hutch.) *
E. TENELLULA (5. MOORE) C. JEFFREY
(=Senecio tenellulus S. Moore) 2
E. TRANSVAALENSIS (H. BOL.) C. JEFFREY
(=Senec1o transvaalensis H. Bol.) 2
-NOTONIA DC. Southern African species moved to
KLEINIA
N. fulgens (Hook, f.) Gulllaumin = KLEINIA
FULGENS
N. welwl tschl 1 (0. Hoffm.) Hlern = KLEINIA
FULGENS
- NOTON IOP5 IS B. NOPDENSTAM Southern African
species moved to KLEINIA
N. fulgens (Hook, f.) B. Nord. = KLEINIA
FULGENS
N. galpini i (Hook, f.) B. Nord. = KLEINIA
GALPINII
-KLEINIA MILL.
1. JEFFREY. 1986. KEW BULL. 91,9: 935-936.
K. CEPHALOPHOPA COMPTON
(=Senecio cephalophorus (Compt.)
Jacobs . ) 1
K. FULGENS HOOK. F.
(=Notonia fulgens (Hook, f.) Gulllaumin)
1
<=Noton1a welwltschll (O. Hoffm.) Hlern)
1
( =Notoniops1s fulgens (Hook, f.) B.
Nord . ) 1
(=Senec1o fulgens (Hook, f.) Nlch.) 1
(-Senecio hookerlanus Jacobsen) 1
(=Senec1o welwltschll O. Hoffm.) 1
K. GALPINII (HOOK. F.) A. BERGER
( =Noton1 ops i s galplnii (Hook, f.) B.
Nord. ) 1
<=Senec1o galplnii Hook, f.) 1
K. LONGIFLOPA DC.
(^Senecio longiflorus (DC.) Sch. Bip) 1
K. STAPELIIFORMIS (PHILL.) STAPF
<=Senec1o stape 1 1 1 f orml s Phlll.) 1
-LAMPROCEPHALUS B. NORD.
1. NOPDENSTAM. 1975. BOT. NOTISEP 128: 323-
326.
L. MONTANUS B. NORD.
-DELAIREA LEM.
1. JEFFREY. 1986. KEW BULL. 91,9: 933.
D. ODORATA LEM.
(=Senec1o mlkanioldes Otto ex Harv.) 1
(=5enec1o scandens DC.) 29
-MIKANIOPSIS MILNE-REDH.
1. JEFFREY. 1986. KEW BULL. 91,9: 878-879.
M. CISSAMPELINA (DC.) C. JEFFREY
(=Cacalia cissampelina DC.) 1
(=Senecio clssampelinus (DC.) Sch. Bip.)
1
-SOLANECIO (SCH. BIP.) WALP.
1. JEFFREY. 1986. KEW BULL. 91,9: 920-923.
S. ANGULATUS (VAHL) C. JEFFREY
( ^Crassocephalum bojeri (DC.) Robyns) 1
( ^Crassocephalum subscandens (A. Rich.)
S. Moore) 1
-OTHONNA L.
6. HUTCHINSON. 1917. ANN. S. AFR. MUS. 9:
909-912.
O. amblfaria S. Moore = EMILIA AMBIFARIA
O. DIVARICATA HUTCH.
O. glauca Klatt = EMILIA MARLOTHIANA
O. polycephala Klatt = EMILIA AMBIFARIA
0. OVALIFOLI A HUTCH.
304
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
9432020
35 0
: 493-
Bothalia 18,2: 305-324 (1988)
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
1987/1988
1st April 1987— 31st March 1988
CONTENTS
Introduction 305
Reports of divisions 306
Staff list 318
Publications by the staff 322
INTRODUCTION
Much progress has been made on several fronts during
the year under review, in spite of the unsettling effect of
the uncertainty about the future of the Botanical Re-
search Institute (BRI). The efforts of the Advisory Com-
mittee for Botanical Research (Figure 1), supported by
the Management of the BRI and National Botanic Gardens
of South Africa (NBG), towards rationalizing state and
semi-state botanical activities in South Africa, have re-
ceived a setback as a result of recommendations made in
the Commission for Administration’s report to which the
Department of Agriculture and Water Supply has reacted.
Even though the matter could still be regarded as sub
judice it has become general knowledge that the BRI
may be fragmented and that it may cease to exist as one
of the major botanical research organizations of interna-
tional importance in the Southern Hemisphere. The
fragmentation of the BRI would be a major disaster and
would cripple the development of botany in this country.
There is little doubt on the other hand, that the proposed
process of rationalization of existing botanical activities
in state and state-supported organizations, including
the amalgamation of the BRI and the NBG to form a
new national botanical organization, would produce
major benefits for all concerned. It is to be hoped that
a solution compatible with national interests will be
found.
A positive, but nevertheless very disruptive event
during this year was the installation of air-conditioning
and a gas-flooding system to protect the extremely
valuable and irreplaceable collections of the National
Herbarium against fire. This major operation took nine
months to complete and caused much disruption. It can
only be ascribed to the diligence of the staff and the ex-
cellent co-operation between our staff and the builders
that work could be continued and that productivity
was only slightly affected. The greater safety of the
collections as well as the improvement in our accommo-
dation, due to other minor works which are being com-
pleted, are advances which will benefit the Institute for
many years to come.
The development of a computerized control system
for the National Herbarium has already produced major
benefits. Together with PRECIS (National Herbarium
[PRE] Computerized Information System), this control
system places the National Herbarium in Pretoria at the
forefront of computer applications to herbarium collec-
tions world- wide.
As a result of the restrictions placed on the creation
of new posts by the State, the plant identification service,
which is severely understaffed, works under great stress.
In order to restrict the use of this gratis service to essen-
tial operations, it was decided to introduce a handling
charge for identifications. A user survey made, high-
lighted many problems, particularly due to the insuffi-
cient time allowed to users to budget for the additional
expense. The implementation of the measure will there-
fore be postponed to April 1989.
Research has continued, with a few exceptions, at a
steady pace. The main barometer for research output is
our publications. All four journals published by the
Institute appeared on schedule. The general house journal
Bothalia, was well supported by staff as well as by outside
contributors. In 1987 the 49th volume of The Flowering
Plants of Africa was published and the fiftieth volume
(in press) will be celebrated by adopting an attractive
illustrated cover and including an editorial. Some signifi-
cant volumes have appeared in the Memoirs of the Bo-
tanical Survey of South Africa series. Number 55, Barrier
plants of southern Africa, summarizes our knowledge of
plants which are suitable for use as hedges or as planted
barriers to human and animal incursions, a topical subject
in these security-conscious times. The second part of
edition two of the List of species of southern African
plants appeared as Number 56 in the series. The signifi-
cance and usefulness of these catalogues is not sufficiently
realized. The second edition of this work lists the ap-
proximately 24000 taxa, and the synonyms applied to
them in the last fifty years, of the flowering plants as
well as mosses and ferns. The existence of this type of
publication, at least at this scale, is unique, as far as
known, to southern Africa. The magnitude of the task
accomplished is only evident when contrasted with the
situation in other parts of the world. It is equivalent to
the listing of all the plants in Europe, including the
Balkans, or of the North American continent excluding
Mexico, or of the whole of the Australian continent.
The fact that computer-produced lists of names of new
species and records as well as name changes appear
annually for use by those interested in plants, is yet
another unique feature. Publications by individual
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
306
FIGURE 1. — Members of the
Advisory Committee for
Botanical Research in Agri-
culture (ACBRA), who at-
tended the annual meeting
of the Committee held on
21st October 1987 in Hol-
land House in the grounds
of the Botanical Research
Institute, Pretoria. Left to
right: Mr P. van Wyk,
Prof. H.P. van der Schijff,
Prof. J.N. Eloff, Prof. J.J.A.
van der Walt, Dr D.J.B.
Killick, Dr O.A. Leistner
(Secretary), Dr W.P. Grob-
belaar. Prof. H.A. van de
Venter, Prof. G.K. Theron
and Dr B. de Winter (Chair-
man).
researchers reached a total of approximately ninety,
maintaining the high level achieved during the last four
or five years.
During the year, a series of public seminars was held
at which the species concept in plants was exhaustively
discussed. These were well attended by scientists from
other organizations and are worth repeating as an excer-
cise in public relations.
Several of our scientists attended overseas congresses
by invitation. The application of computers to the re-
search in the Botanical Research Institute was particularly
well presented and had a marked impact at the Inter-
national Botanical Congress held in West Berlin in 1987.
Two of the staff who attended were appointed to sub-
committees of the Nomenclature Committee of the
IAPT.
The Institute can therefore look back on a very pro-
ductive year, a fact which is in stark contrast to the
threats to its future existence. The country cannot afford
the disappearance of a research organization which con-
tributes so significantly to the botanical knowledge
essential for maintaining a viable environment.
HERBARIUM DIVISION
Under-staffing and a heavy workload remain serious
problems for the four herbaria of the Institute affecting
all major functions, namely, curation, research and
herbarium services. Although every effort is being made
to resolve this situation, it is unlikely that any meaning-
ful solution will be forthcoming for some time into the
future.
National Herbarium, Pretoria (PRE)
Curation
Approximately 187 scientific journals are scanned
annually for taxonomic and nomenclatural changes
FIGURE 2. — Details of a plant
specimen loan, requested
by an herbarium in Europe,
being typed into the com-
puter by Mrs M. Heyman.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
covering the Flora of southern Africa region. These
contained 134 articles of direct relevance to southern
Africa. A total of 678 changes was recorded affecting
about 2,8% of the flora. These include: 230 new names
(130 new taxa, 85 names brought back into use and 15
species new to the region), 172 names reduced to
synonymy, 51 new combinations, 27 orthographic cor-
rections and six names removed because the taxa were
mistakenly recorded from southern Africa.
The updating of the PRECIS database continued
with more than 4000 specimens having undergone
name changes and over 3 000 having had their grid
references added or corrected, and 600 specimens were
deleted from the database. Other miscellaneous changes
affected 1 100 specimens.
Distribution records were significantly extended for
56 taxa, mostly at the provincial level (Transvaal, seven
new taxa, OFS 10, Natal eight, Cape 19, Transkei five,
Lesotho two and Swaziland one) with four new records
for southern Africa.
Computerization
Applications have been developed on the Herbarium’s
Burroughs B28 multi-user computer system to record
and manage all records involving plant identifications,
specimen loans (Figure 2) and exchanges as well as the
maintenance of an up-to-date list of plant names used
by PRE. These applications have been operational since
July, 1987 and, in the 9 months to date, have greatly
improved the efficiency of these services. Although
initially somewhat apprehensive, herbarium staff, after
very little training, adapted readily to computerization.
Accommodation
The National Herbarium and Mary Gunn Library,
together with other parts of the BRI (Figure 3), under-
went major disruptive changes with the installation of
fire protection (halon flooding) and air conditioning
(Figure 4). These alterations should be complete by
1 April, 1988. This will be followed immediately by
FIGURE 3. — Hoisting a roof sky-light into position above the
east well of the main building.
three further additions to the Herbarium, namely, the
installation of three working bays on the south side of
each herbarium wing, a special room for decontaminating
and drying specimens and a new SEM room and various
other rooms adjacent to the moss Herbarium. These
additions should be complete by July, 1988. In spite
of the considerable disruption caused by the building
FIGURE 4. — The newly instal-
led air-conditioning plant
situated on the roof of the
main building of the Insti-
tute.
308
operations during the last nine months productivity
remained on par due only to the concerted efforts of
all staff concerned.
Visitors
In addition to numerous local visitors from various
universities, Government institutes, nature conservation
departments etc., together with members of the general
public, the herbarium was also consulted by officers and
personnel from Lesotho, Botswana, Swaziland, Bophu-
thatswana, Venda and the Transkei.
A number of overseas botanists visited the Institute
and Herbarium. These included: Dr N. Jurgens (Hamburg,
W. Germany); Miss S. Liede (Hamburg, W. Germany);
Prof. O.H. Volk (Wurzburg, W. Germany); Dr G. Davidse
(St Louis, USA); Mr S. Hammer (New Mexico, USA);
Dr R. Mithen (Harare, Zimbabwe); Dr J. Scott (Austra-
lia); Prof. V.H. Heywood (Kew, England); Prof. C. Wu
(Tamshui, Taiwan).
Collecting expeditions
These included trips to the north-western OFS (general
collecting), Richtersveld ( Asclepias , various legumes and
general collecting); south-western Cape (lichens), central
Karoo (general collecting); Natal — Itala Game Reserve
(general collecting); Namaqualand (Car ex, Hepaticae
and general collecting) and the north-eastern OFS (general
collecting).
Herbarium services
Plant identifications numbering 273 batches and
1 5 620 specimens were undertaken for officers of this
Institute, various state departments, provincial admini-
strations, universities and neighbouring states. The
major users of the service were: universities, 30% of the
material identified; the BRI 29%; botanic gardens
14%; museums 9%; private collectors 8%; nature
conservation 5%; Forestry 3% and Agriculture 2%.
Identifications for 152 visitors numbered 946. In addi-
tion, backlogs totalling 8 501 specimens (mostly ex-
changes which date back more than 15 years), were
checked and, where necessary, named or renamed. En-
quiries received by telephone totalled 978. New acces-
sions to the herbarium numbered 19 618.
Specimen loans sent to local and overseas herbaria
numbered 84 (comprising 1 1 374 specimens) with exist-
ing 74 loans (5 400 specimens) returned. The total num-
ber of outstanding loans is 327 (35 357 specimens).
9 761 specimens were despatched as part of exchange
agreements and 4 525 were received by PRE. Specimens
received as gifts totalled 1001 while 1414 specimens
were dispatched as gifts in return.
Research and related activities
The family Polygonaceae (G. Germishuizen). A revision
of the genus Oxygonum was completed for southern
Africa. Eight new taxa were described and an existing
taxon reinstated. Work on the genera Fagopyrum, Emex
and Rumex is still in progress.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
The family Ricciaceae (Hepaticae) (S.M. Perold). Descrip-
tions of 35 Riccia taxa have been completed towards a
revision of the genus. Three papers were published which
included two new white-scaled species of Riccia. Two
additional papers are in preparation, one describing a
further two new white-scaled Riccia species.
Revision o/Vigna (Fabaceae) (B.J. Pienaar). The taxon-
omy of the two major species complexes, V. unguiculata
and V. vexillata has been completed together with V. ner-
vosa. Work on the remaining four taxa (V. frutescens,
V. luteola, V. lobatifolia and V. oblongifolia) is in pro-
gress.
Revision of Carex (Cyperaceae) (C. Reid). 15 taxa have
been delineated with five taxa, mainly from the winter
rainfall region, still requiring further investigation. Two
new species were identified and are being prepared for
publication.
Revision of the broad-leaved species of Asclepias (A.
Nicholas). A review of the literature is under way. 847
selected specimens from local herbaria were loaned and
examined. A preliminary assessment of the genus is that
it is one of convenience and will probably have to be
split into a number of smaller, more natural, genera.
Contributions to the moss flora (J. van Rooy). The 2nd
fascicle has been published. Fascicle three is nearing
completion. Dr R.E. Magill has completed 12 families
with two still outstanding and Mr J. van Rooy has com-
pleted nine genera in the family Orthotrichaceae with a
single genus outstanding. A start has also been made
with the illustrations for this fascicle.
Contributions to the lichen flora (F. Brusse). Sixty eight
new lichen taxa were recorded for southern Africa. Two
new genera, Schizodiscus and Lithoglypha, were publish-
ed as well as eight new species of Parmelia and one of
Porpidia.
Transvaal wild flowers (Vol. 2) (G. Germishuizen). Work
on this volume is progressing well with over 200 taxa
(50%) having been illustrated with texts completed for
90 of these.
Plant species and synonym list (various contributors).
Edition 2, Part 2 (Dicotyledons) has now been published.
Research support
Scanning electron microscope (S.M. Perold). 3 384 micro-
graphs were prepared for various BRI and outside work-
ers. These include grass leaf surfaces, Oxygonum pollen,
Vigna seeds and stigma surfaces, Coccinia leaf surface
glands, lichen epicortex structure and Riccia spores and
thalli.
Expansion of collections from poorly represented areas
(various contributors). Richtersveld — holdings for three
V4° grids increased by 76% from 211 to 889 collections;
Namaqualand — two V4° grids increased by 78% from
67 to 304 collections; north-western OFS — three V4°
grids increased by 94% from 21 to 503 collections;
north-eastern OFS — two V4° grids increased by 99%
from three to 273 collections; Itala Game Reserve —
309
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
one V grid increased by 57% from 130 to 299 collec-
tions: central Karoo — four V4° grids increased by 84%
from 121 to 770 collections. The overall increase for the
above fifteen V4° grids collected was 90% .
Expansion of the fruit, seed and spirit collections (E.
Retief and G. Germishuizen ) . This has been contributed
to largely from material collected during fieldwork for
other projects. The fruit collection was extended by 170
to 4 567 collections, the seed collections by 414 to 4 134
collections and the spirit collection by 371 to 3 726 col-
lections.
Publications
28 articles appeared in local (23) as well as overseas
(5) journals. A further 24 articles are in press awaiting
publication.
Contributions to outside publications
Various members of the Division contributed to the
following publication by checking the text: I. Sinclair
— A pocket guide to the butterflies of southern Africa.
Natal Herbarium, Durban (NH)
Mrs M. Jordaan, Curatrix of the herbarium and officer-
in-charge of the unit for the past three years, was trans-
ferred to the National Herbarium in July, 1987. Miss R.
Williams, previously at the University Herbarium, Dur-
ban-Westville, was appointed in her place. Mr D.B. Ntom-
bela resigned at the beginning of March and a replace-
ment for him has not yet been found. Continuity and
considerable support were provided throughout the
year by Mrs H. Noble and Mr A.M. Ngwenya.
A steady flow of specimens (167-382 per month)
was received for identification. The number of specimens
identified totalled 3 439. This is significantly less than
the previous year’s figure of 6 596. There were, however,
noticeable increases in all other activities, namely, 437
visitors to the herbarium, four student groups, 1 296 tele-
phone enquiries, 312 letters written, 738 specimens sent
out on loan, 4 121 specimens mounted and 3 506 speci-
mens accessioned. 3 501 specimens were renovated in an
attempt to upgrade the condition of the older and more
valuable collections.
A single major collecting trip was undertaken to the
Itala Nature Reserve and several shorter 1—2 day trips to
localities closer to Durban. Mr Ngwenya assisted Dr Pablo
Weisser of the BRI on two major trips to Zululand.
Albany Museum Herbarium, Grahamstown (GRA)
Mrs E. Brink continues to curate the herbarium. Miss
S.A. Olivier was appointed as an Herbarium Assistant at
the beginning of the year to assist with various curatorial
functions. She, however, resigned again in November
with the post remaining vacant to date.
Mrs R. Hart, appointed by the Albany Museum to
curate the Pocock Marine Algae collection, resigned in
May. Her place was filled by Dr A. Jacot Guillarmod,
who retired from the herbarium the previous year. Mr
Neil Abrahams has continued his invaluable, voluntary
assistance in labelling specimens and mounting reprints
and articles.
Despite the many upheavals, the herbarium continued
to remain functional with 1 448 specimens identified,
573 visitors received, 480 telephone enquiries answered,
244 letters written, 1108 specimens mounted, 2 509
specimens accessioned, 136 specimens sent out on loan
and 555 specimens sent out as gifts. Educational displays
prepared during the year included nine for the Albany
Museum and 19 for the herbarium.
The garden which has always been associated with the
herbarium is to be redesigned by a local horticulturist
and will be renamed after Miss G.V. Britten who died in
October, 1987, having devoted 63 years of her life to the
herbarium.
The removal of alien species from the Grahamstown
Nature Reserve continued throughout the year. Clearing
the infestation, which dates back to 1935, is an impos-
sible task for one man. Mr R. Klaas and Mrs Brink his
supervisor, who visited the reserve 40 times during the
year, deserve considerable credit for their undaunted
efforts in this regard.
Government Herbarium, Stellenbosch (STE)
The herbarium remains in the temporary accommoda-
tion in the old Carnegie Library of the University while
renovations are being undertaken in the Natural Sciences
building. These are proceeding on schedule which should
allow the herbarium to return to the building, but on the
second floor, by the end of 1989.
During the year 4 405 specimens were identified. These
were mainly for the unit’s own staff, including ecologists
in Stellenbosch and Cape Town, local state departments
(Agriculture, Forestry, Nature Conservation) and small
amounts for the Universities of Stellenbosch and Cape
Town, private firms and individuals. Telephone enquiries
during the year numbered 282, with 150 letters written.
Accessions to the herbarium were 5 397 and loans sent
out 25, comprising 2 629 specimens in 58 genera. The
unit also received 320 individual visitors and two groups
of students.
A single general collecting trip was undertaken to a
site at Houw Hoek to be developed by Houwteq. A pre-
liminary collection of all flowering material was made.
This work has now been taken over by the University of
Stellenbosch. Mr E.G.H. Oliver made several trips to col-
lect fruiting material of minor genera and type material
of under-collected species of Erica.
Mr Oliver continued his work on the minor genera of
Ericaceae. With the inclusion of Philippia and Blaeria in
Erica, the small African genus Ericinella has also had to
be included. A problem now exists with the monotypic
genus Bruckenthalia. The last complex of four genera is
also proving extremely variable and difficult to unravel.
310
FLORA RESEARCH DIVISION
Flora of southern Africa (FSA )
The FSA subproject has continued to co-ordinate
taxonomic research on southern African plants. There
are about 190 potential contributors to the FSA, the
majority of whom are overseas specialists in their plant
groups. Through them, the FSA maintains scientific
contacts with other countries. The Department continued
the research contract to the University of Cape Town for
the Orchidaceae volume, with Dr H.P. Linder as the active
researcher. The sixth meeting of the FSA working group
was held during the Congress of the South African Asso-
ciation of Botanists at Cape Town in January 1987.
News of interest to FSA contributors was circulated in
Forum Botanicum, the newsletter of SAAB.
One Flora fascicle was published: Bryophyta, Part 1,
Fascicle 2, covers 94 species and 32 genera in the 10
families Gigaspermaceae to Bartramiaceae, by Dr R.E.
Magill of the Missouri Botanical Garden. To date, the
total number of species treated in published parts of the
FSA is 2 884, which is 13% of the total of 22 000 species
in the southern African flora.
Another fascicle is in press: Volume 16, Part 3, Fas-
cicle 16, Fabaceae, Crotalarieae, Aspalathus, by the late
Prof. R. Dahlgren of the University of Copenhagen, Den-
mark. This fascicle, which was put in final form by
Mrs E. du Plessis after the death of Prof. Dahlgren,
covers the 278 species of the genus Aspalathus, and will
be the largest FSA fascicle yet published.
One ancillary volume was published: List of species
of southern African plants, Edn 2, Part 2, covering di-
cotyledons, by G.E. Gibbs Russell, W.G. Welman, E.
Retief, K.L. Immelman, G. Germishuizen, B.J. Pienaar,
M. van Wyk & A. Nicholas. The List of species is a pre-
cursor to the FSA that presents up-to-date coverage of
all taxa at increasing levels of approximation. Edition 2
includes for each genus the name and author, the current
revisor and the literature necessary to identify specimens
to species and to determine important synonymy; and
for each species the name and authors of currently ac-
cepted names and of important synonyms since the com-
pletion of Flora capensis. During this half-century, about
1 2 000 commonly used names have gone into synonymy
for our 24 000 taxa. Future editions will contain addi-
tional species information, such as distribution, conser-
vation status and life form.
Dr B. de Winter and Dr G.E. Gibbs Russell attended
the week-long Nomenclature Section preceeding the In-
ternational Botanical Congress in Berlin. Dr De Winter
was asked to serve on the General Committee, that
governs all nomenclatural matters in the years between
International Botanical Congresses. Dr Gibbs Russell was
appointed to the Special Committee for Registration of
Plant Names, that will try to achieve greater stability in
nomenclature by controlling the effectiveness and validity
of publication of plant names.
Institute staff members, and outside contributors on
contract and working voluntarily made the following
progress with volumes and fascicles for the FSA :
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
Bryophyta: Dr R.E. Magill of the Missouri Botanical
Garden has completed 12 families for the third fas-
cicle on mosses, and Mr J. van Rooy has completed
eight genera in the family Orthotrichaceae. Illustra-
tions for the third volume are being done by Miss
G.C. Condy.
Vol. 2: Poaceae — Oryzoideae, Centostecoideae and
Bambusoideae. Two more species groups in Ehrharta
have been completed by Dr Gibbs Russell and Dr R.P.
Ellis and published in Bothalia.
Revisionary studies in Arundinoideae have been un-
dertaken by Dr Ellis in conjunction with Dr G. Davidse
of the Missouri Botanical Garden ( Prionanthium , Tri-
bolium and Urochlaena), Dr Linder of the Bolus Her-
barium ( Pentaschistis and related genera) and Mr N.P.
Barker ( Pentameris and Pseudopentameris).
Miss M. Koekemoer is preparing single-page treatments
of important pasture species illustrated with colour
photographs of diagnostic features. These treatments
are written in a simple style suitable for farmers, and
information about pasture value will be contributed
by staff of the Pasture Research Centre.
A group consisting of Dr Gibbs Russell, Mrs L. Fish,
Dr H.M. Anderson, Miss Koekemoer, Mr Barker and
Mrs W.J.G. Roux are working on a manual for identi-
fication of the 200 genera and 970 taxa of southern
African grasses. Information is being recorded through
the DELTA computer system, as a prototype for the
next approximation of Taxon-PRECIS. As a result,
computer-aided identification will be possible in addi-
tion to identification in the traditional way by keys
and illustrations.
Vol. 5: Liliaceae — Aloinae. The FSA manuscript for
Aloe by Dr H.F. Glen and Mr D.S. Hardy is with refer-
ees. Dr Glen, assisted by Mrs S.M. Perold, has examined
certain key tropical African species for leaf epidermal
types using the scanning electron microscope. Five
papers supporting or extending the FSA manuscript
have been prepared, and several more are in prepara-
tion. The manuscript of Kniphofia by Dr L.E. Codd
is with the Editor, and Mr J. van Jaarsveld of the
National Botanic Gardens, Kirstenbosch has produced
a final version of his Gasteria treatment.
Vol. 5: Liliaceae — Asparagoideae. Miss K.L. Immelman
has taken over this fascicle, left incomplete at the
retirement of Mrs A.A. Mauve (Obermeyer). The 70
species were accepted without change, but outstand-
ing nomenclatural problems required much work, as
did re-writing keys to the species and revising distri-
bution maps.
Vol. 8: Orchidaceae. Dr Linder has completed the first
draft of the entire manuscript, except the genus Dis-
peris, which will be contributed by Dr J. Stewart of
the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Miss C. Smith of
Cape Town has completed most of the illustrations.The
fascicle will cover about 50 genera and 440 species.
Vol. 9: Salicaceae, Fagaceae, Urticaceae and Piperaceae.
FSA manuscripts have been prepared by Miss Immel-
man and Dr lb Friis of the Botanical Museum, Copen-
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
311
hagen, for all genera and a synopsis of Salix was
published in Bothalia. Publication of the FSA fascicle
awaits completion of Moraceae by Dr H. Baijnath of
the University of Durban-Westville.
Vol. 11: Mesembryanthemaceae. Dr H.E.K. Hartmann
and her students at the University of Hamburg, West
Germany, have completed several genera in Leipoldtii-
nae.
Vol. 16: Fabaceae. Mr B.D. Schrire’s account of the
tribe Desmodieae, as well as a conspectus of Tephrosia
subgenus Barbistyla in the tribe Millettieae, was
published in Bothalia. He is now working in the tribe
Indigoferae and has intensively studied species limits
in lndigofera. Mr Schrire is world co-ordinator for
Indigoferae for the ILDIS (International Leguminosae
Database and Information Service) project and attend-
ed a co-ordinator’s meeting in Edinburgh.
Vol. 23: Lythraceae, Lecthidaceae and Rhizophoraceae.
Miss Immelman undertook phenetic studies to clarify
species limits in Ammonia using the DECORANA
computer program package and presented a paper on
her results at the 1988 SAAB Congress. Nesaea, Gal-
pinia, Heimia and Lythrum showed fewer problems
at species level.
Vol. 24: Myrtales. Work is progressing at various levels
in this group. Prof. E.F. Hennessy at the University
of Durban-Westville is working on Combretum, Prof.
A.E. van Wyk at the University of Pretoria is working
on Myrtaceae and Melastomataceae. Manuscripts of
Onagraceae by Dr P. Goldblatt of the Missouri Bota-
nical Garden and of Trapaceae by Dr B. Verdcourt
of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, are with the
Editor.
Vol. 25: Ericaceae. Mr E.G.H. Oliver has continued
studies in the ‘minor genera’. The small southern
tropical African genus Ericinella has also been in-
cluded in Erica. He read a paper on problems of
classification of capsular genera at the 1988 SAAB
Congress.
Vol. 28: Convolvulaceae. Prof. A.D.J. Meeuse of the
University of Amsterdam has submitted a treatment
of the 15 genera and 120 species in this family, and
Miss W.G. Welman of the BRI is converting it for the
FSA.
Vol. 30: Pedaliaceae — Gesneriaceae. Prof. H-D. Ihlen-
feldt and his students of the University of Hamburg,
West Germany, are preparing the manuscript for the
families Pedaliaceae, Martyniaceae and Orobanchaceae.
Prof. O.M. Hilliard based at the Royal Botanic Gar-
dens, Edinburgh, has completed an adaptation of her
treatment of Streptocarpus for the FSA .
Vol. 30: Acanthaceae — Justicieae. Miss Immelman’s
completed FSA manuscript is with the editor, and
Mrs J. Munday’s treatment of Monechma is finished.
These two large genera await completion of small
genera by several researchers from other institutions
before the fascicle can be published. Included with
it will be Myoporaceae and Plantaginaceae by Dr Glen.
Pretoria Flora
Dr O.A. Leistner completed the family Sterculiaceae
and brought the text for all families (except Cyperaceae)
up to date with the latest information. A total of 100
pages was translated by Mrs E. du Plessis and typeset by
Mrs S.S. Brink. A further 149 pages were given a final
check. Texts of 81 species must still be finalized, out of
a total of 1 780.
Namaqualand Flora
Dr C. Boucher of the University of Stellenbosch was
awarded a contract by the Department of Agriculture
and Water Supply to produce an identification manual
for the 3 500 species comprising this unique flora. Taxon-
omic treatments will be contributed by specialists in
particular families, with other groups being written up
by Mrs G.D. Court of Grahamstown, who has begun her
work with Lamiaceae. Contributions are co-ordinated by
Miss A. le Roux of Cape Nature Conservation, Stellen-
bosch.
Palaeo flora of southern Africa
Dr J.M. Anderson and Dr H.M. Anderson are in the
final stages of completing the second volume in the
Molteno Palaeoflora series. This study deals with the
gymnosperms, and includes a revision of the taxa oc-
curring throughout the Gondwana Triassic Realm. A
total of 22 genera and 90 species (1 7 genera and 60 spe-
cies from the Molteno Formation) are described. The
work focusses particularly on exploring new metho-
dologies in sampling, taxonomy and data presentation
in the study of fossil floras. This has led to new insights
on speciation processes, diversity trends and phyto-
geographic patterns.
Liaison Officer, Kew
Mr Schrire is in his third year of duty as South Afri-
can Liaison Officer. He has provided information about
taxonomic and related subjects to 174 researchers on
the southern African flora, and has pursued his research-
es in Fabaceae, which are detailed above. He represented
the PRECIS computer system for the Institute at the
third meeting of the Taxonomic Databases Working
Group held in Edinburgh in October 1987.
DATA SUBDIVISION
The subdivision co-ordinates the computer work of
the Institute. Two large systems maintained on the
B7900 mainframe are the taxonomic database PRECIS
and the ecological database PHYTOTAB. Links are main-
tained to IBM mainframes for the library (SABINET),
the ecological bibliography and for typesetting. Several
divisions now operate their own microcomputers: the
Vegetation Ecology Division has the Hewlett-Packard
9845B; the Herbarium and Flora Research Divisions
share a Burroughs 26 network linker to the B7900 main-
frame; the Plant Structure and Function Division has
two Olivetti PC’s, and the Experimental Ecology Divi-
sion in Cape Town and the Stellenbosch Unit each have
IBM PC’s.
312
PRECIS, managed by Mrs J.C. Komarovsky and Mr
N.P. Barker, consists of four components. In this year,
information from PRECIS was supplied to about 90
research projects throughout South Africa and overseas.
Specimen-PRECIS contains herbarium specimen label
data in 24 data fields for 643 000 specimens in PRE her-
barium. About 12 000 specimens were added during the
year. Taxon-PRECIS contains recent useful literature,
synonymy, status as naturalized alien, and status of cur-
rent taxonomic research for the 24 000 plant taxa in
southern Africa. It served as the data source for the List
of species of southern African plants, Edition 2, Part 2,
Dicotyledons, and an index to the nearly 2 000 plates
in volumes 1—49 of The Flowering Plants of Africa.
Name changes for 1986 were published in Bothalia,
and the lists of 1987 name changes were prepared.
Future developments will include distribution, life
form, distinguishing characters, flowering time and im-
portance to man. Prototypes have been designed for
Poaceae, Fabaceae and for the Namaqualand Flora.
A paper on this aspect of PRECIS was presented at the
1988 SAAB Congress by Dr G.E. Gibbs Russell. No-
menclature-PRECIS has begun as a prototype for Po-
aceae, to be developed further when staff is available.
Curatorial-PRECIS is being developed on the Burroughs
26 microcomputer network by Mr T.H. Arnold, and will
link information from specimen-PRECIS to the curato-
rial and administrative needs of Herbarium Division.
Dr Gibbs Russell presented a seminar at the Royal
Botanic Gardens, Kew and an invited paper at the 14th
International Botanical Congress, Berlin, about practi-
cal results from the PRECIS system. She also conducted
a workshop to teach use of the DELTA system for
recording descriptive information at the National Botani-
cal Gardens, Kirstenbosch and demonstrated use of
DELTA for grass identification at the 1988 SAAB and
Grassland Society Congresses.
PHYTOTAB, managed by Mr M.D. Panagos, includes
48 published ecological surveys and field data sets. Mrs
C. Vermeulen is currently loading habitat descriptions,
species names and community names into the database.
Miss M. Morley is responsible for PHYTOTAB use at
the Stellenbosch Botanical Research Unit. During the
last year, extensive use of the system was made by Mrs
D. Roberts and Mr H. Bailey of the University of Natal,
Durban and Mr M. Peel and Mr D. Snyman of the Pas-
ture Research Centre, Pretoria. New programs were
developed by Mrs B.C. de Wet and Mr R.H. Westfall
for automatic phytosociological classification and for
habitat analysis.
Smaller systems continuing on the B7900 include the
Garden Records system, developed by Mrs de Wet and
maintained by Mrs K. Clarke, for the plants in the
botanic garden, and PHOTOS, developed by Miss A.P.
Backer for photographic vegetation records for Vege-
tation Ecology Division.
STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION DIVISION
In December 1987 Dr J.J. Spies became head of this
division in succession to Dr R.P. Ellis, who is now a
Specialist Scientist.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
Dr Gerrit Davidse of the Missouri Botanical Garden,
St Louis, USA, spent three months working in the Divi-
sion as a recipient of a Department of Agriculture and
Water Supply Research fellowship. During this period,
the taxonomy and cytogenetics of the endemic Cape
Fynbos arundinoid grasses were concentrated on,
particularly the genera Prionanthium, Tribolium and
Urochlaena.
Cytogenetics
Dr Spies and his team, in collaboration with Dr
Davidse of the Missouri Botanical Garden, concentrated
on chromosome numbers of the winter rainfall grasses.
Approximately one-third of the world’s species belong-
ing to the tribe Arundineae, is restricted to South Africa,
the majority being endemic to the western Cape. This
cytogenetic study presented an opportunity to study
the chromosome numbers of many of these species, 43
in all, for the first time. The study further indicated that
basic chromosome numbers of 6, 7 and 13 are found in
the tribe. These findings support the anatomical sugges-
tion- that Merxmuellera, Pentaschistis, Pentameris,
Prionanthium and Pseudopentameris are related.
Intensive studies on the genera Alloteropsis, Digitaria,
Ehrharta, Heteropogon, Pentaschistis, Prionanthium,
Tribolium and Urochlaena are progressing well. Pre-
liminary studies on Digitaria eriantha indicate that the
low seedset observed may be attributed to abnormal
meiosis and the resultant gamete abortion.
Comparative anatomy
Dr Ellis concentrated on the genus Pentaschistis in
conjunction with Dr H.P. Linder of the University of
Cape Town and Dr G. Davidse of the Missouri Botanical
Garden. An intensive fieldwork programme was under-
taken with the objective of collecting and studying in
the field as many of the ±60 species of Pentaschistis as
possible. This was highly successful and 52 different
species were located in this single growing season, in-
cluding 17 new and undescribed taxa. To date, only
three known species of Pentaschistis have not been col-
lected for anatomical study. Preliminary indications of
the leaf anatomy, morphology and biology are that
Pentaschistis cannot be studied in isolation from Merx-
muellera, Pentameris and Pseudopentameris and that
all these genera may be artificial as presently constituted
and that realignment of taxa is needed to reflect rela-
tionships more naturally.
Mary Gunn Library
The future well-being and safety of the book and
journal collection should be ensured by the installation
of airconditioning and a fire detection and extinguishing
system. These extensive renovations disrupted the work
of our librarians, Mrs E. Potgieter and Mrs B.F. Lategan
but, nevertheless, a valuable service was provided to
many South African botanists. A total of 1 750 books
and journals was borrowed, 2 123 interlibrary loans were
handled, 2 629 enquiries dealt with, 28 360 photocopies
made and 270 volumes were bound. During the year 224
new books were purchased, in addition to the 411 jour-
nal titles to which the Institute subscribes.
Botha lia 18,2 (1988)
313
VEGETATION ECOLOGY DIVISION
The functions of the Vegetation Ecology Division
under Dr J.C. Scheepers are to study the vegetation of
South Africa and its ecological relations. This work in-
volves three main aspects; the identification, descrip-
tion, classification and mapping of the various kinds of
vegetation; study of the ecological relationships between
different kinds of vegetation — with one another and
with the environment — and of the various processes
and mechanisms that determine the behaviour of plant
communities; and the application of such ecological
knowledge to the management and utilization of vege-
tational resources.
Transvaal bushveld and forest studies
Mr R.H. Westfall is studying the vegetation ecology
of the Sour Bushveld of the Waterberg area of the central
Transvaal. Fifty stands representing 10 different vegeta-
tion types have been sampled. A new method for deter-
mining species cover with greater precision than the
usual scale-estimation methods was developed. Cover
results now compare favourably with cover values ob-
tained with the cover meter for structural analyses.
The new method entails counting individuals within
transects which are related to crown size and individual
spacing and should be of interest to those who are inter-
ested in determining cover quickly on a species basis.
between Kosi Bay and Sodwana were produced from
aerial photographs. They are currently being used for
the drawing of conservation-priority maps. Vegetation
monitoring on dunes continued (Figure 6).
Mr M.G. O’Callaghan has laid out 22 permanent tran-
sects across the salt marshes of four western Cape estua-
rine systems to obtain a better understanding of their
dynamics and environmental relationships. Variations
in salinity and water depth were measured from March
to September, soils were sampled in September, and
vegetation was sampled on a bi-monthly basis between
March and November. Data have not been fully analysed
as yet. Preliminary indications are that inundation period,
inundation regularity and salinity are important factors
in determining vegetation patterns.
Cape fynbos studies
Research on the Mountain Fynbos in the Cederberg
is making good progress. The preliminary checklist of
the Cederberg flora, completed during the year, totals
nearly 1 400 taxa. The list is being updated by further
collections and from literature. The special study in the
Welbedacht area, required by management prior to an
experimental burn, was completed by the addition of
17 releves to last year’s data base. Another 40 releves
have rounded off the northern sector; and analysis of
the data has commenced.
The Sabie transect has been extended by Mr G.B.
Deall into the Montane and Subalpine Belts of the East-
ern Transvaal Escarpment. Floristic analysis of these
additional data yielded 1 1 new communities distributed
amongst forest (three communities) (Figure 5), wood-
land (three communities), shrubland (two communities),
and grassland (three communities). A series of papers is
being finalized for publication.
Coastal studies
The vegetation study of the KwaZulu coastal dunes
between Richards Bay and the Mlalazi Lagoon by Dr P.J.
Weisser was terminated after the main results were pub-
lished. Twelve 1 :20 000 vegetation maps of the dune area
Mr D.J. McDonald has finalized publications on the
vegetation, environment and flora of the Swartbosch-
kloof, Jonkershoek, near Stellenbosch. He is also making
good progress on his studies of the fynbos and other
vegetation in the mountain catchments of the Langeberg
in the south-western Cape. The fieldwork on the Boos-
mansbos transect is nearing completion and field data
will be synthesized and compared with the results from
the first transect.
Grassland studies
The field work for the survey of the vegetation in the
Amersfoort area of the eastern Transvaal Highveld has
been completed by Miss B.J. Turner. All field data have
FIGURE 5. — Moist kloof forest
of escarpment slopes in the
Sabie area, eastern Trans-
vaal. Conspicuous in the
canopy are: Anthocleista
grandiflora (Big-leaf Tree)
and Combretum kraussii
(Forest Bush Willow).
314
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
FIGURE 6. — Dune vegetation in
the Mlalazi Nature Reserve
on the north coast of Natal.
The vegetation of this area
is being studied and moni-
tored by Dr P.J. Weisser of
the Vegetation Ecology
Division. The photograph
shows very clearly the de-
bris zone resulting from
the September 1987 floods,
followed by the dune ridge
generated by colonization
of the debris deposited by
the Demoina floods of
1984.
been loaded onto the Burroughs mainframe computer
and production of the final classification table is nearing
completion. Good progress is being made with the writing
up of this study.
Mr P.J.J. Breytenbach has completed preparatory
work and commenced field work in the Grootvlei area
of the south central Transvaal Highveld.
Karoo studies
A reconnaissance study of the karoo and other vege-
tation in the Graaff-Reinet and Middelburg areas of the
eastern Karoo Region by Mr A.R. Palmer is well advanced.
He has prepared a hierarchical classification of the
vegetation. A study of the soil gradient, which corres-
ponds with this classification, has also been undertaken,
and both are being prepared for publication. Other
publications in preparation include a phytochorological
account of the flora of the study area and an assessment
of the use of LANDSAT MSS data to map the vegetation.
Central technical support services
Miss A.P. Backer has loaded bibliographic references
from 1976 to 1986 onto ATMS and these have been
transferred to STAIRS. The second ecological literature
data base is now operational and literature searches can
be undertaken.
Further progress has been made on the ecological
data bank by Mrs B.J. Vermeulen. Forty-seven literature
data sets have been obtained comprising theses, publica-
tions, reports and field data sets. From these sources the
data have been compiled for the phytosociological data
base. Thirty-five matrix data sets have been loaded onto
the computer of which 24 sets have appeared in publish-
ed versions and 1 1 sets are awaiting classification.
EXPERIMENTAL ECOLOGY DIVISION
Research emphasis of the Division, headed by DrM.C.
Rutherford, has increased in Karoo systems and the
Strandveld sectors of the Fynbos Biome, while maintain-
ing levels of work in other parts of this biome. This is
in keeping with the Division’s increased focus on prob-
lems of the more arid, drought-stressed ecosystems, the
alien invasive plant-stressed ecosytems as well as on the
special stresses that develop in the Fynbos Biome through
substrate disturbance. Various experimental perturba-
tions have been initiated at field research sites through
installation of replicated shade structures, irrigation
plots and rain-out shelters. Since many of the expected
effects of these applications are long-term, results are
necessarily limited at this stage.
Liaison with the Botany Department of the University
of Cape Town has increased with, for example, various
post graduate students tackling suggested mini-projects
on aspects that directly complement some of the re-
search facets of the Division. Various levels of active
liaison have been maintained with other researchers
within the co-operative Fynbos and Karoo Biome Pro-
grammes.
The Division’s experimental nursery area at Rosebank
came under threat through the unexpected sale and re-
development of part of the land that was being used.
Partial relocation of structures has resulted in unsatis-
factory conditions which are hopefully temporary.
Fynbos reproductive ecology
Dr C.F. Musil has found that densities of seedlings, in
the first year of coastal fynbos vegetation recovery fol-
lowing a late spring fire, were considerably higher than
those of resprouting plants. In shaded conditions and in
close proximity to burnt alien Acacia saligna, densities
of fynbos seedlings decreased, whereas those of resprout-
ing plants increased. Seedling recruitment of both A. sa-
ligna and fynbos species was not confined to any one
particular season, but was staggered over a period of
several months from early autumn to late spring. Species
with large seeds, such as A. saligna and certain members
of the Proteaceae and Restionaceae emerged earlier and
from greater depths than those with small seeds.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
Fynbos - alien invasive plant interactions
Dr M.C. Rutherford and Mr J. de W. Bosenberg have
established that plant populations of the calcareous
substrates of the West Coast Strandveld, South Coast
Strandveld and Limestone Fynbos react in different ways
to introduced Acacia cy clops. The largest proportion of
positively affected species were annuals (including alien
species such as Lolium temulentum) on the more arid
consolidated sands in Strandveld. The highest proportion
of negative species response occurred within typical
Limestone Fynbos and included species such as Protea
obtusifolia and Adenandra obtusata. Species that were
positively associated with Acacia cy clops on the lime-
stone substrates were mainly of Strandveld affinity and
included Rhus glauca and R. laevigata. Decreasing soil
moisture levels may reduce the tolerance of some Strand-
veld species, such as R. glauca, to presence of Acacia
cyclops.
Fynbos transformation studies
Mr G.W. Davis and Mr A.P. Flynn have found that
physical disturbance of Mountain Fynbos by rotivation
can reduce both floristic and micro-environmental vari-
ability during the first two-and-a-half years of recovery.
Multivariate and correlation analyses of data from an
experimental site indicated that changes in the seasonal
water and surface temperature regimes are significantly
associated with these system changes. A trial on seeds
of the dominant species, Leucadendron zanthoconus,
showed that burial below 20 mm significantly reduced
germination, a factor to be considered in interpreting
the observed pattern of revegetation following rotivation.
The increase in productivity of two introduced Protea
species on the disturbed treatment, relative to the un-
disturbed control, was not significant.
Mr Davis has constructed a preliminary computer
model which simulates the utilization of fynbos veld by
a wildflower harvesting business. The current algorithm
matches seasonal market demands (based on export
trade figures) against the availability and retrieval costs
of flowering material from a set of hypothetical popula-
tions of suitable plant species. These can then be assess-
ed'for levels of expected exploitation and possible de-
gradation.
Functional ecological studies in Karoo
Mr G.F. Midgley’s water relations data from a small
number of non-succulent shrubby plant forms in the
winter rainfall Karoo suggest that there are a limited
number of important structural and functional adap-
tations which determine the success of these forms
under arid conditions. The two most important structu-
ral characteristics appear to relate to the root/shoot
ratio and rooting habit. These probably determine sea-
sonal patterns of plant water stress and, at least, the
potential for plant growth, flowering and seed set. The
functional ability to adjust leaf osmotic potential to
minimize water stress, and the ability to withstand
tissue water deficit may determine the success of ever-
green non-succulent forms with limited root develop-
ment.
Mr L.W. Powrie has started to construct a computer
database of important plant species population respon-
315
ses in Karoo using both formal and the largely untapped
informal information sectors. The database pays special
attention to plant responses to major events including
episodic rainfall, drought, mass defoliation and selec-
tive defoliation incidents. The database is multipurpose
but will also allow for systematic sifting of information
for the objective identification of key research problems
concerning Karoo plants.
PLANT EXPLORATION DIVISION
The division, under Mr M.J. Wells, continued to con-
centrate on weeds, plant invaders and food plant research.
HighUghts were the publication of Declared weeds and
alien invader plants in South Africa, Plant invaders of
the Transvaal and Barrier plants of southern Africa.
Conservation of germ plasm
Mr T.H. Arnold and Mrs L.D. Jacobs made one col-
lecting trip to KwaNdebele, during which 60 seed samples
of tribal crop plants were obtained. In addition, 722
samples of previously collected material were split for
distribution, labelled, packaged and stored in chest
freezers. Thirty collections were sent to researchers at
the Summer Grain Centre at Potchefstroom. Thirty
samples of indigenous food plants, legumes and cucur-
bits, collected by Miss S.E. Chadwick, were distributed
to people who wished to experiment with growing them
— including workers from the FAO, Israel and the USA.
Mrs H. Joffe collected 106 seed and 29 vegetative samples
of indigenous plants from the garden for distribution to
interested nurserymen. Germination experiments are
also being carried out to test the longevity of garden
seed stored under our freezer conditions.
Indigenous food plants
Mr A.A. Balsinhas abstracted information from seven
publications, bringing the references consulted for the
national food plants data bank to a total of 224. The
newly consulted references contributed information
about 617 species and resulted in the addition of eight
new names to the list of food plants which now includes
1 617 species.
Miss Chadwick prepared manuscripts on nine of the
14 priority food plants of the veld that are being studied:
Cucumis metuliferus, C. africanus, C. kalahariensis,
Acanthosicyos horridus, Coccinia rehmannii, C. sessili-
folia, C. adoensis, Bauhinia petersiana and Guibourtia
coleosperma. These manuscripts are to be published as
species brochures in the illustrated series Plants in south-
ern Africa. Plants of these species have been grown in
the nursery in order to replenish seed stocks — depleted
as a result of providing researchers and entrepreneurs
with material. Three lectures were presented: ‘The migh-
ty cucumber’ to the Botanical Society of South Africa,
‘Edible fruits’ to college teachers and course advisers of
the Department of Education and Training, and ‘A bo-
tanist in southern Africa’ to the South African Associa-
tion of Botanists.
Primitive crop plants of African origin
Twenty five crop frequency/preference question-
naires were filled in with the help of local tribesmen
in Kwa Ndebele by Mr Arnold and Mrs Jacobs.
316
The morphological characteristics of 267 Sorghum
collections and 122Pennisetum collections were analysed,
bringing the total number analysed to 2 266. The chlorox
test for tannin content was applied to 122 samples, bring-
ing the total to 1 132 samples tested. All of the Sorghum
and Pennisetum material collected (except that from the
last field trip) has now been processed and all records
have been entered in the computer data bank. Field
work has been completed and the next stage of the work
will involve computer analyses of the data.
Barrier plants
Barrier plants of southern Africa, Memoirs of the Bo-
tanical Survey of South Africa No. 55, was published.
This memoir contains the results of a survey made whilst
Miss L. Henderson, now of the Plant Protection Research
Institute, was on our staff. It includes suggestions for in-
digenous hedging and shelter belt plants to replace the
often-used alien species, some of which have become
invasive.
Woody invaders
The popular version of Miss Henderson and Mrs K.J.
Musil’s survey of woody plant invaders of the Transvaal
was published. Mr Wells completed a chapter on invaders
of the fynbos for a publication on invaders of Mediter-
ranean-type ecosystems of the world. He also presented
a paper on medical problems possibly caused by the in-
vasive alien Solatium mauritianum.
Catalogue of problem plants
This catalogue which appeared last year has sold well
and is widely used by agricultural and conservation per-
sonnel. More information about listed and additional
species is being filed by Mr Wells for possible future
editions. He reported on additions to the list at the 8th
National Weeds Conference. The catalogue and file
material has proved invaluable in providing background
information on plants put forward for classification as
declared weeds or invaders.
Declared weeds and invader plants
A bulletin on plants already declared as weeds or
invaders (alien spp. only) under Act 43 of 1983 was
published. Its preparation was co-ordinated by Mrs
D.M.C. Fourie.
Water conservation gardening
Public interest in gardening under drought conditions
continues. Mrs Fourie has been called on to give four
lectures on the subject and to answer queries from as
far afield as Majorca.
Garden utilization
Mrs H. Joffe, who was recently promoted to Senior
Agricultural Research Technician, has significantly in-
creased the level of garden utilization this year. In addi-
tion to seed for propagative purposes, she collected 148
seed samples and 35 samples of vegetative material re-
quested by various researchers, for illustration, educa-
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
tional or display purposes. One hundred and four seed
and fruit collections were cleaned and prepared for
the herbarium carpological collection. A boost was
given to the herbarium spirit collection with the in-
clusion of 73 seed or fruit and 158 flowering collections
from the garden. In all, 723 colour slides were taken of
various parts or developmental stages of plants in the
garden. These were supported by 218 voucher specimens
for the herbarium. Research staff were assisted with
finding or monitoring progress of garden collections.
Garden staff were also assisted with germination experi-
ments, and garden records staff with mapping and naming.
New, more comprehensive garden utilization record
forms were introduced and existing records were trans-
ferred to them. Mr Wells assisted with the text of a
brochure on the garden which is now ready for publica-
tion.
Scientific information service
Mrs Fourie handled 324 written and 272 telephonic
requests for material and information, and dealt with 47
individual visitors and 13 groups. She also obtained col-
lecting permits from various authorities for both visitors
and Institute staff.
A layman ’s guide to botanical publications
Over the years many requests have been received,
especially from overseas visitors, regarding books dealing
with various aspects of our flora and vegetation. Answers
to these queries have been combined and amplified,
resulting in a list of publications that can serve as a lay-
man’s introduction to this vast subject. A draft of the
list has been completed by Mrs Fourie and will now be
circulated to publishers for suggested additions. It
currently contains 350 references, classified according
to the regions and plant groups that they cover. Publi-
cation of this guide is scheduled for the coming year.
Liaison service
In the absence of a liaison officer, no facilities could
be offered to visiting school groups but Mrs Fourie pro-
vided or arranged lectures and/or tours for teachers,
trainee teachers and a few special interest groups. A
publicity and educational article on the Institute, by
Mr Wells, appeared in Archimedes.
PRETORIA NATIONAL BOTANICAL GARDEN
The garden staff, under the direction of Mr D.H. Dry,
divided their attention between building up the scientific
and display collections and providing service facilities
and public amenities.
Mrs K. Clarke recorded 599 accessions, mainly seed
and cuttings collected in the Fynbos and Succulent Karoo,
by Mr D.F. Strydom, Mr N.A. Klapwijk and Mrs H. Joffe.
Mrs Joffe and Mr Klapwijk are experimenting with various
methods of germinating and establishing indigenous
species that have proved difficult to grow in the past.
Mr Klapwijk obtained the National Diploma in Horticul-
ture and was appointed as an Agricultural Research
Technician at the start of the year. He received the
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
317
FIGURE 7. — The northern side
of the main glasshouse
showing the recently in-
stalled new extractor fans.
Orchids, palms and ferns
are housed in this glass-
house.
Pretoria Technikon’s prize as best horticulture student.
His talents are being put to good use in re-developing
the water garden in the general planting area.
Mr N.F. van Zyl obtained his National Diploma in
Horticulture, with six distinctions, at the end of the year.
He has also been appointed as an Agricultural Research
Technician and is responsible for the propagation of
FIGURE 8. — Young visitors to the Pretoria National Botanical
Garden walking along the nature trail running east-west
along the ridge which bisects the Garden.
material for mass plantings. Garden development, includ-
ing mass planting, has had to be curtailed in favour of
maintenance. This is due to the exceptionally heavy
rains (over 600 mm) the last few months which have
resulted in the need for weed control, road repairs and
lawn maintenance.
The nursery, under Mr D.S. Hardy, has benefited by
renovation of the main glasshouse which has received
a new wet wall and extractor fans (Figure 7). The old
fan and wall fittings are being re-used in a smaller glass-
house.
The public has also not been neglected. Mr L.C.
Steenkamp has been responsible for paving an additional
2 200 m of nature trails (Figure 8) and 26 new benches
have been located in the garden.
B 10 S Y STEM ATICS DIVISION
Pending further developments this division has con-
tinued to devote itself largely to the scientific and
technical editing of the publications of the Institute.
Dr O.A. Leistner is in control of the division, Mrs E. du
Plessis assists with the editing of Die Flowering Plants of
Africa /Die Blomplante van Afrika and Flora of southern
Africa and she is responsible for most of the translations
from English to Afrikaans required by the Institute, and
Mrs B.A. Momberg assists with the editing of Bothalia
and Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa.
About one-third of the typesetting required by the In-
stitute was done in-house, by Mrs S.S. Brink.
Bothalia
Numbers 1 and 2 of Vol. 17 and the index to Vol. 16
were published. It is planned to publish the first number
of each volume in May and the second in October of
each year.
Flora of southern Africa (FSA )
Part 1 fascicle 2 of the Bryophyta was published (see
Flora Research Division).
Vol. 16,3,6 on the genus Aspalathus is in press and
has reached the page-proof stage.
318
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
The Flowering Plants of Africa ( FPA )/Die Blomplante
van Afrika
Vol. 49,3 & 4 were published and 50,1 & 2 are in
press.
Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa
The following were published after having been pre-
sented to the printer in camera-ready form:
No. 55, Barrier plants of southern Africa (L. Hender-
son), and No. 56, List of species of southern African
plants edn 2, part 2. No. 57, the third edition of Veld
types of South Africa by J.P.H. Acocks will go to press
in a few days.
Palaeo flora of southern Africa
Vol. 2 of the Molteno Formation is nearing comple-
tion.
The National List of Trees
The third, revised and enlarged edition of this work
by B. de Winter, J. Vahrmeijer and F. von Breitenbach
was published.
Plant invaders of the Transvaal /Indringerplante van die
Transvaal (L. Henderson & K.J. Musil) and Verklaarde
onkruide en uitheemse indringerplante in Suid-Afrika/
Declared weeds and alien invader plants in South Africa
(M . Henderson, D.M.C . Fourie , M.J .Wells & L. Henderson)
were published.
SEMINARS
During the year several interesting public seminars
were held, two dealing with species concepts from dif-
ferent viewpoints — these were a continuation of the
series on the same subject held during 1986/87. Details
of the seminars are as follows:
1987.03.25
Prof. G.J. Bredenkamp (PU vir CHO): Spesiebegrippe:
’n ekologiese standpunt.
Dr J.J. Spies (NIP): Spesiebegrippe: ’n sitogenetiese
standpunt.
1987.06.25
Dr J.M. Anderson (BRI): Species concepts: a palaeo-
botanical viewpoint.
Dr R.P. Ellis (BRI): Species concepts: an anatomical
viewpoint.
1987.08.06
DrM.Zavada(USA): Evolution of Angiosperms: apalaeo-
botanical perspective.
1987.09.10
Dr G. Davidse (USA): Fruit dispersal in grasses.
1987.09.24
Dr G.E. Gibbs Russell (BRI): Changes in the ICBN re-
sulting from the Berlin Botanical Congress.
1988.02.25
Dr E. Kovacs-Endrody (Geological Survey): Two anta-
gonistic approaches to the study of fossil plants.
BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Scientific, Technical and Administrative Staff
(31st March 1988)
Director
B. de Winter, M.Sc., D.Sc. (Taxonomy of Poaceae, espe-
cially Eragrostis, and of Hermannia ; plant geography)
Deputy Director
D.J.B. Killick, M.Sc., Ph.D., F.L.S. (General taxonomy;
nomenclature; mountain ecology and editing)
ADMINISTRATION DIVISION
Chief Provisioning Ad-
ministration Clerk . . . J.T.C. Snyman
(Head of Division)
State Accountant Mrs J. Rautenbach
Senior Provisioning Ad-
ministration Clerks . . . Mrs I.A. Ebersohn
* Half-day
Personal Secretary to
Director
Senior Registration
Clerk
Registration Clerk
Accounting Clerk
Receptionist
Typists
Miss W.J. Geldenhuys
Mrs S. Swanepoel
Mrs M.M. Vaughan
Mrs M.M. Loots
Mrs I.J.H. Joubert
Miss A. Schinkel
G. Herman
Miss M. Francis
Mrs S.S. Brink
Mrs E.L. Bunton*
Mrs J.M. Mulvenna
Mrs S.M. Thiart*
Mrs M.P.M.C. van der Merwe*
HERBARIUM DIVISION
Officer-in-Charge T.H. Arnold, M.Sc.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
319
NATIONAL HERBARIUM, PRETORIA (PRE)
Assistant Director .... T.H. Arnold, M.Sc. (Curator;
taxonomy of Ficinia )
Herbarium Assistant . . . Mrs C.J. van Niekerk
Wing A (Pteridophytes-Monocotyledons)
Senior Agricultural
Researcher Miss C. Reid, B.Sc. Hons
(Taxonomy of Car ex ; plant
identifications)
Chief Agricultural
Research Technician . . Mrs L. Fish, B.Sc.
(Plant identifications)
Herbarium Assistant . . . Mrs S. Burger
Wing B (Piperaceae-Oxalidaceae)
Senior Agricultural
Researcher G. Germishuizen, M.Sc.
(Taxonomy of Polygonaceae;
plant identifications)
Senior Agricultural
Researcher Mrs C.M. van Wyk, M.Sc.
(Plant identifications)
Chief Agricultural
Research Technician . . Mrs B.J. Pienaar, B.Sc. Hons
(Taxonomy of Vigna\ plant
identifications)
Administrative Assis-
tant III C. Letsoalo
Wing C (Linaceae— Asclepiadaceae)
Senior Agricultural
Researcher Miss E. Retief, M.Sc.
(Plant identifications)
Senior Agricultural
Technician
Agricultural Researcher .
Agricultural Research
Assistant
Herbarium Assistant . . .
Mrs M. Jordaan, B.Sc.
(Plant identifications)
A. Nicholas, M.Sc.
(Taxonomy of Asclepiada-
ceae; plant identifications)
A.A. Balsinhas**
(Plant identifications)
Mrs J.L.M. Grobler*
Wing D (Convolvulaceae-Asteraceae)
Senior Agricultural
Researcher Miss W.G. Welman, M.Sc.
(Plant identifications)
Senior Agricultural
Researcher P.P.J. Herman, M.Sc.
(Plant identifications)
Principal Agricultural
Research Technician .. Mrs M.J.A.W. Crosby*, B.Sc.
(Plant identifications)
Administrative Assis-
tant III J. Phahla
Cryptogamic Herbarium
Agricultural Researcher . F.A. Brusse, M.Sc.
(Lichens)
* Half-day
** Part-time
Assistant Agricultural
Researcher . . J. van Rooy, B.Sc. Hons
(Musci)
Chief Agricultural
Research Technician .. Mrs S.M. Perold*, B.Sc.
(S.E.M. technician; taxon-
omy of Ricciaceae)
Herbarium Assistant . . . Mrs L. Filter*
Herbarium Services
Agricultural Researcher .
Herbarium Assistants . .
Typist
Administrative Assis-
tant III
Mrs E. van Hoepen, M.Sc.
(Controlling officer)
Mrs M. Dednam*
(Plant identification services)
Mrs M.Z. Hey man*
(Loans and exchanges)
Mrs C.M. Havenga
G. Lephaka
(Preparation and packaging)
NATAL HERBARIUM, DURBAN (NH)
Assistant Agricultural
Researcher
Provisioning Admini-
strative Clerk . . .
Administrative Assis-
tants III
Administrative Assis-
tants II
Miss R. Williams, B.Sc. Hons
(Curator; plant identifica-
tions)
Mrs H.E. Noble*
A. M. Ngwenya
D.B. Ntombela
B. M. Mbonambi
S.B. Nzimande (Gardener)
GOVERNMENT HERBARIUM, GRAHAMSTOWN (GRA)
Senior Agricultural
Researcher Mrs E. Brink, B.Sc. (Curator;
plant identifications)
Administrative Assis-
tants III A.D. Booi
R. Klaas (Grahamstown Na-
ture Reserve)
Administrative Assis-
tants I J. Zenzile
GOVERNMENT HERBARIUM, STELLENBOSCH (STE)
Senior Agricultural
Researcher
Assistant Agricultural
Researcher
Agricultural Research
Technician
Herbarium Assistants . .
Administrative Assis-
tants III
E.G.H. Oliver, M.Sc.
(Curator; taxonomy of Eri-
caceae)
Mrs J.B.P. Beyers, B.Sc. Hons
(Plant identifications)
Mrs A.C. Fellingham, B.Sc.
(Plant identifications)
Mrs G.M. Thai
Miss H. Steensma
Mrs J. Leith
Miss E. van Wyk
320
FLORA RESEARCH DIVISION
Officer-in-Charge
Assistant Director . . . .
Senior Agricultural
Researcher
Assistant Specialist
Scientist
Agricultural Researchers .
Assistant Agricultural
Researcher
Agricultural Research
Technician
Graphic Artist ....
Agricultural Research
Assistant
G.E. Gibbs Russell, Ph.D.,
F.L.S.
G. E. Gibbs Russell, Ph.D.,
F.L.S. (Taxonomy of Po-
aceae, plant geography, elec-
tronic data processing)
H. F. Glen, M.Sc., Ph.D.
(Taxonomy of Aloe)
J.M. Anderson, M.Sc., Ph.D.
(Palaeobotany, plant geo-
graphy)
Miss K.L. Immelman, M.Sc.
(Taxonomy, especially Acan-
thaceae, Lythraceae, Urtica-
ceae)
B.D. Schrire, M.Sc.
(Taxonomy of Fabaceae,
electronic data processing)
H.M. Anderson, M.Sc., Ph.D.
(Palaeobotany)
Miss M. Koekemoer, B.Sc.
Hons (Grass species mono-
graphs)
Miss G.C. Condy, M.A.
Mrs W.J.G. Roux*
(Plant distributions, speci-
men administration)
DATA SUBDIVISION
Data Officer G.E. Gibbs Russell, Ph.D.,
F.L.S.
Datametricians N.P. Barker**, B.Sc. Hons
(PRECIS, phenetic classifi-
cation)
Mrs B.C. de Wet*, B.Sc.,B.A.,
H.D.L.S.** (Garden records,
programming for PHYTO-
TAB and taxon-PRECIS)
Agricultural Research
Technician Mrs J.C. Komarovsky, B.Sc.
(PRECIS Database manager)
Agricultural Research
Assistants Mrs E.B. Evenwel (Quality
control for PRECIS)
Mrs H. von Ronge (New spe-
cimen encoder for PRECIS)
PLANT STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION DIVISION
Officer-in-Charge J.J. Spies, M.Sc., Ph.D.
CYTOGENETICS
Assistant Director .... J.J. Spies, M.Sc., Ph.D.
(Cytogenetics of grasses)
* Half-day
** Biometry and Datametries
t Research Centre for Pasture Science
% Library Services, Department of National Education
Agricultural Researcher
Senior Agricultural
Research Technician .
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
Mrs E. van der Merwe, M.Sc.
(Cytogenetics of Digitaria )t
Mrs H. du Plessis, B.Sc. Hons
(Cytogenetics of grasses)
Agricultural Research
Technicians Mrs E.J.L. Saayman, B.Sc.
Hons (Cytogenetics of gras-
ses)
Mrs S.C. Angelo, B.Sc. Agric.
(Cytogenetics of Digitaria )+
COMPARATIVE PLANT ANATOMY
Specialist Scientist .... R.P. Ellis, M.Sc., D.Sc.
(Anatomy of grasses)
Agricultural Research
Assistant Mrs A.G. Botha
(Microtechnique)
PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
Photographer Mrs A.J. Romanowski
MARY GUNN LIBRARY
Senior Librarian Mrs E. Potgieter, B.Libr.*
Clerical Library
Assistant Mrs B.F. Lategan**
VEGETATION ECOLOGY DIVISION
Officer-in-Charge J.C. Scheepers, M.Sc., D.Sc.
Assistant Director .... J.C. Scheepers, M.Sc., D.Sc.
(Vegetation ecology, espe-
cially of forest/woodland/
grassland relationships; con-
servation and land-use plan-
ning; phytogeography)
Senior Agricultural
Researchers D.J. McDonald, M.Sc.
(Mountain fynbos ecology
and phytosociology; Braun-
Blanquet approach and tech-
niques)
A.R. Palmer, M.Sc.
(Karoo ecology ; remote sens-
ing; nature conservation; ve-
getation mapping)
H.C. Taylor, M.Sc.
(Mountain fynbos and forest
ecology; Braun-Blanquet ap-
proach and techniques; con-
servation)
P.J. Weisser, Ph.D.
(Forest ecology; air-photo
interpretation and mapping;
reedswamp ecology; Zulu-
land coast dune vegetation;
conservation)
R.H. Westfall, M.Sc.
(Ecology and phytosociol-
ogy of Transvaal bush veld;
ecological data and literature
storage, retrieval and pro-
cessing; syntaxonomic no-
menclature)
321
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
Agricultural Researchers
Assistant Agricultural
Researchers ....
Principal Agricultural
Research Technician .
Research Technicians .
Agricultural Research
Technicians ....
G.B. Deall, M.Sc.
(Vegetation ecology of fo-
rest/woodland/grassland in-
terrelationships)
M.G. O’Callaghan, M.Sc.
(Estuarine ecology and phy-
tosociology; land-use plan-
ning and management; na-
ture conservation)
P.J.J. Breytenbach, B.Sc. Hons
(Grassland ecology; pasture
science; nature conserva-
tion)
Miss B.J. Turner, B.Sc. Hons
(Grassland ecology ; pasture
science; nature conserva-
tion)
J.F. van Blerk, B.Sc. Hons
(Succulent Karoo ecology;
ecological literature; pasture
science; photography)
M.D. Panagos, N. Dipl. Agric.
(Bot. Res.)
(Computer science; data
processing; sampling and
monitoring vegetation and
environment)
Miss A.P. Backer, B.Sc.
(Ecological data processing
and presentation; ecological
literature; nature conserva-
tion; air-photo interpreta-
tion and cartography; pho-
tography)
Miss M. Morley, B.Sc. Agric.
(Ecological data processing
and presentation; ecological
literature ; estuarine and fyn-
bos vegetation; air-photo in-
terpretation and cartogra-
phy)
Mrs J. Schaap, H.P.E.D.
(Draughtsmanship and car-
tography; artwork, layout
and design)
Mrs BJ.Vermeulen, B.Sc. For.
(Nat. Cons.)
(Ecological data banking;
information systems; syn-
taxonomic nomenclature)
Mrs W. Jones, B.Sc.
(Computer science; ecologi-
cal data processing and pre-
sentation; remote sensing;
air-photo interpretation and
cartography)
W.J. Myburgh, B.Sc.
(Grassland ecology; pasture
science; nature conserva-
tion)
Agricultural Research
Assistant
C.M. van Ginkel, N.Dipl.
(Nat. Cons.) (Karoo eco-
logy; nature conservation;
photography; remote sens-
ing)
Mrs H.M. Hills, T.H.E.D.
(Technical, editorial and ad-
ministrative support func-
tions)
EXPERIMENTAL ECOLOGY DIVISION
Officer-in-Charge M.C. Rutherford, M.Sc., Ph.D.,
Dipl. Datamet.
Assistant Director .... M.C. Rutherford, M.Sc., Ph.D.,
Dipl. Datamet.
(Primary production ecology
of terrestrial ecosystems; ex-
perimental ecological studies
in strandveld, fynbos and
Karoo)
Senior Agricultural
Researcher C.F. Musil, M.Sc., Ph.D.
(Reproductive ecophysiol-
ogy in fynbos)
Agricultural Researchers G.W. Davis, M.Sc.
(Transformations of fynbos
ecosystems by the wild
. flower picking industry)
G.F. Midgley, B.Sc. Hons
(Plant stress ecology in
Karoo ecosystems)
L.W. Powrie, M.Sc.
(Plant population response
ecology in Karoo)
Research Technicians . . A.P. Flynn, B.Sc.
(Fynbos ecology; plant
community development)
J . de W. Bosenberg, B.Sc. Hons
(Fynbos and Karoo ecology;
monitoring effects of alien
plants on strandveld and
fynbos)
Provisioning Admini-
stration Clerk . . .
Agricultural Research
Assistant
Miss C.H. Agnew
D.M. de Witt
(Laboratory, field and cura-
torial assistance)
PLANT EXPLORATION DIVISION
Officer-in-Charge
Assistant Director
Assistant Agricultural
Researcher
Chief Agricultural
Research Technician . .
M J. Wells, M.Sc.
M.J. Wells, M.Sc.
(Weeds research, botanical
horticulture, fynbos utiliza-
tion and conservation)
Miss S.E. Chadwick, B.Sc.
Hons (Indigenous food
plants and primitive crops)
Mrs D.M.C. Fourie*, B.Sc.
(Scientific information ser-
vice)
Half-day
322
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
Senior Agricultural
Research Technician . . Mrs H. Joffe*, B.Sc.
(Garden utilization)
Agricultural Research
Technicians A.A. Balsinhas**
(Indigenous food plant data
bank)
Mrs L.D. Jacobs, B.Sc. Hons
(Crop plants of African
origin)
PRETORIA NATIONAL BOTANICAL GARDEN
Chief Agricultural
Research Technician . . D.H. Dry, NTC Dip. (Hort.)
(Curator)
First Agricultural
Research Technicians . D.S. Hardy
(Nursery supervision, succu-
lents and orchids)
D.J.F. Strydom, NTC Dip.
(Hort.), Dip. Rec. P.A.
(Supervision northern sec-
tion of the garden)
* Half-day
** Part-time
Agricultural Research
Technicians N.A. Klapwijk, NDH
(Supervision southern sec-
tion of garden)
N.F. van Zyl, NDH
(Propagation for main plant-
ings)
Agricultural Research
Assistant Mrs K. Clarke
(Garden records)
Farm foremen L.C. Steenkamp
(Supervision of labour)
G.R. Lubbe
(Workshop and stores)
BIOSY STEM ATIC S DIVISION
Officer-in -Charge
Assistant Director
Senior Liaison Officer
O.A. Leistner, M.Sc., D.Sc.,
F.L.S.
O.A. Leistner, M.Sc., D.Sc.,
F.L.S. (Editing)
Mrs E. du Plessis, B.Sc. Hons,
S.E.D. (Editing and trans-
lating)
Senior Agricultural
Research Technician .. Mrs B.A. Momberg*, B.Sc.
(Editing)
PUBLICATIONS BY THE STAFF
(1987.04.01-1988.03.31)
BRINK, E. 1987. Grace Violet Britten (23.2.1904-10.10.1987).
The Elephant’s Child 10,3: 34-35.
BRUSSE, F.A. 1987a. Coronoplectrum, a new lichen genus from
the Namib Desert, South West Africa/Namibia. Mycotaxon
28: 131-135.
BRUSSE, F.A. 1987b. Two new brown subcrustose Parmelia
species from southern Africa (lichenized Ascomycetes).
Bothalia 17: 25-28.
BRUSSE, F.A. 1987c. A new species of Gonohymenia from
Etosha Pan limestone. Bothalia 17: 35-37.
BRUSSE, F.A. 1987d. A new species of Thyrea from Otavi dolo-
mite (Damara System). Bothalia 17: 37-40.
BRUSSE, F.A. 1987e. Echidnocymbium (Biatoraceae), a new
lichen genus from southern Africa. Mycotaxon 29: 173 —
176.
BRUSSE, F.A. 1 9 8 7 f . Eremastrella montana (Psoraceae), a new
lichen species from the Drakensberg, South Africa. Myco-
taxon 29: 177-181.
BRUSSE, F.A. 1987g. Schistoplaca (Lichenes, Biatoraceae) a
new lichen genus. Mycotaxon 29: 245-249.
BRUSSE, F.A. 1987h. A new yellow Acarospora (Lichenes)
from the Waterberg, South West Africa/Namibia. Bothalia
17: 179-181.
BRUSSE, F.A. 1987i. Psathyrophlyctis, a new lichen genus from
southern Africa. Bothalia 17: 182-184.
BRUSSE, F.A. 1987j. A new species of Trapelia (Lichenes) from
southern Africa. Bothalia 17: 187-188.
BRUSSE, F.A. 1988. Three new species of Parmelia (Lichenes)
from southern Africa. Mycotaxon 31: 155-162.
CHADWICK, S.E. 1987. Trichodesma scottiL The Flowering
Plants of Africa 49: t. 1946.
CODD, L.E. & JOFFE, H. 1987. X Ruttyruspolia (Acanthaceae)
a natural intergeneric hybrid. Veld & Flora, Dec. 1987:
150-151.
DAV1DSE, G. & ELLIS, R.P. 1987. Arundoclaytonia, a new ge-
nus of the Steyermarkochloeae (Poaceae: Arundinoideae)
from Brazil Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 74:
479-490.
DAVIS, G.W. 1987. Performance of a laboratory-constructed
anemometer under summer field conditions on a Mountain
Fynbos experimental site. Bothalia 17: 136-138.
DE WINTER, B. 1987. Review: Genera graminum — grasses of
the world, by W.D. Clayton & S.A. Renvoize. Bothalia
17: 299-300.
DRY, D.H. 1987a. Danie Dry says. Park Administration, Apr.:
30-31.
DRY, D.H. 1987b. Danie Dry se. Park Administration, Jul.: 34-
36.
DRY, D.H. 1987c. Danie Dry says. Park Administration, Oct.:
20-21.
DRY, D.H. & DE VRIES, J. 1987. Landskapering met inheemse
plante. Parks and Grounds No. 41 May: 61-65.
DU PLESSIS, E. 1987. Obituary: John Frederick Vicars Phillips
(1899-1987). Bothalia 17: 267-268.
ELLIS,R.P. 1987a. Leaf anatomy of the genus Ehrharta (Poaceae)
in southern Africa: the Setacea group. Bothalia 17: 75-
89.
ELLIS, R.P. 1987b. Leaf anatomy of the genus Ehrharta (Poaceae)
in southern Africa: the Villosa group. Bothalia 17: 195 —
204.
ELLIS, R.P. 1987c. A review of comparative leaf blade anatomy
in the systematics of the Poaceae: the past twenty-five
years. In T.R. Soderstrom et al. Grass systematics and
evolution: 3-10. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washing-
ton.
FRIIS, 1., IMMELMAN, K.L. & WILMOT-DEAR, C.M. 1987. New
taxa and combinations in old world Urticaceae. Nordic
Journal of Botany 7 : 125-126.
GERMISHUIZEN, G. 1987a. A new species of lndigofera from
Natal and Transkei (Fabaceae). Bothalia 17: 33-34.
GERMISHUIZEN, G. 1987b. A new species of Oxygonum from
Natal (Polygonaceae). Bothalia 17: 40-41.
GERMISHUIZEN, G. 1987c. A new species of Rhynchosia from
the Richtersveld (Fabaceae). Bothalia 17: 181-182.
GERMISHUIZEN, G. 1987d. A new variety of Oxygonum alatum
(Polygonaceae). Bothalia 17: 185-187.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E. 1987a. Taxonomy of the genus Ehrharta
(Poaceae): the Setacea group. Bothalia 17: 67-73.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E. 1987b. Taxonomy of the genus Ehrharta
(Poaceae): the Villosa group. Bothalia 17: 191-194.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E. 1987c. Preliminary floristic analysis of
the major biomes in southern Africa. Bothalia 17: 213 —
228.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E. 1987d. Review: Gramineae for the Flora
of Turkey, Vol. 9, edited by P.H. Davis. Australian grass
genera, anatomy, morphology, keys and classification,
2nd edn, by L. Watson & M.J. Dallwitz. Bothalia 17:
297-298.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E. 1987e. Review: Grasses, sedges, restiads
and rushes, by O.M. Hilliard. South African Journal of
Science 83: 501.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E. & ELLIS, R.P. 1987. Species groups in
Ehrharta (Poaceae) of southern Africa. Bothalia 17: 51-
65.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., REID, C., FISH, L., GERMISHUIZEN,
G., VAN WYK, M„ VAN ROOY, J. & STAFF 1987. New
taxa, new records and name changes for southern African
plants. Bothalia 17: 269-275.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., WELMAN, W.G., RETIEF, E„ IMMELr
MAN, K.L., GERMISHUIZEN, G., PIENAAR, B.J., VAN
WYK, M. & NICHOLAS, A. 1987. List of species of south-
ern African plants. Edn 2, part 2. Memoirs of the Botani-
cal Survey of South Africa No. 56, pp. 270.
HARDY, D.S. 1987a. Aloe compressa. Aloe 24: 4.
HARDY, D.S. 1987b. The Namib, a living sea of sand. 6. Aloe
24: 6-7.
HARDY, D.S. 1987c. For the love of an island. 15. Aloe 24:
8-9.
HARDY, D.S. 1987d. Review: Flowers of southern Africa. Aloe
24: 10.
HARDY, D.S. 1987e. The Namib, a living sea of sand. 6. Aloe
24: 29-30.
HARDY, D.S. 1 987 f. Madagascar — the rescued ones. Aloe 24:
40-41.
HARDY, D.S. 1987g. Pachycereus pringlei. Aloe 24: 42.
HARDY, D.S. 1987h. Robert Allen Dyer, 1900-1987. Aloe 24:
44.
HENDERSON, L. 1987. Barrier plants of southern Africa. Me-
moirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 55,
pp. 97.
HENDERSON, L. & MUSIL, K.J. 1987. Plant invaders of the
Transvaal. Department of Agriculture and Water Supply,
Bulletin 412, Pretoria.
HENDERSON, M., FOURIE, D.M.C., WELLS, M.J. & HENDER-
SON, L. 1987. Verklaarde onkruide en uitheemse indringer-
plante in Suid- A frikaj Declared weeds and alien invader
plants in South Africa. Department of Agriculture and
Water Supply, Bulletin 413, Pretoria.
HEYL, T„ GORST-ALLMAN, C.P., WELLS, M.J., FOURIE,
D.M.C., SERVOIR, K„ KEENE, A.R. & STEYN, P.S.
1987. Smodingium dermatitis. South African Medical
Journal 71: 440-441.
IMMELMAN, K.L. 1987. Synopsis of the genus Salix (Salicaceae)
in southern Africa. Bothalia 17: 171-177.
LE ROUX, C.J.G., GRUNOW, J.O., MORRIS, J.W., BREDEN-
KAMP, G.J. & SCHEEPERS, J.C. 1988. A classification
of the vegetation of the Etosha National Park. South
African Journal of Botany 54: 1—10.
MACDONALD, I.A.W., CLARK, D.L. & TAYLOR, H.C. 1987.
The alien flora of the Cape of Good Hope Nature Reserve.
South African Journal of Botany 53: 398-404.
MALAN, O.G. & WESTFALL, R.H. 1987. A new strategy for
vegetation mapping with the aid of Landsat MSS data.
Advances in Space Research 7, 11: 97-103.
McDONALD, D.J. 1987a. Ordination by detrended correspon-
dence analysis (DCA) of the vegetation of Swartbosch-
kloof, Jonkershoek, Cape Province. Bothalia 17: 121 —
129.
McDONALD, D.J. 1987b. The Marloth photographic collection
— a legacy. Veld & Flora 73: 94—95.
McDONALD, D.J. & OLIVER, E.G.H. 1987. Erica barrydalensis
L. Bol. — a rediscovery of a rare species. Veld & Flora
73: 101-102.
NICHOLAS, A. 1987a A new species and a new combination
of Asclepias (Asclepiadaceae) in southern Africa Bothalia
17: 17-23.
323
NICHOLAS, A. 1987b. Notes on Asclepias diploglossa, A. cog-
nata and A. flava. Bothalia 17: 29-32.
NICHOLAS, A. 1987c. Review: Transvaal Lowveld and escarp-
ment, South African Wild Flower Guide 4, by Jo Onder-
stall. Bothalia 17: 297.
OLIVER, E.G.H. 1987a. Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae).
V. The genus Coilostigma. Bothalia 17: 163-170.
OLIVER, E.G.H. 1987b. Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae).
VII. The placing of the genus Philippia into synonymy
under Erica ; the southern African species. South African
Journal of Botany 53: 455-458.
OLIVER, E.G.H. 1987c. Review: Hottentots Holland to Her-
manus, South African Wild Flower Guide 5, by Lee Bur-
man and Anne Bean. Bothalia 17: 297.
POWRIE, L.W. 1987. Botanic gardens and environment aware-
ness. Parks and Administration, Oct. 1987: 15-17.
REBELO, A.G., COWLING, R.M., GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E.,
HOCKEY, P. A. R., JARMAN, M.L., BOUCHER, C. &
HILTON-TAYLOR, C. 1987. Guidelines for the plant
atlas of southern Africa. CSIR-FRD Ecosystem Program-
me Occasional Report No. 23.
REID, C. 1987a. Review: Flora of Australia (Vol. 46), Iridaceae
to Dioscoreaceae, edited by Alexander S. George. Bothalia
17: 155.
REID, C. 1987b. Review: The Moraeas of southern Africa, by
Peter Goldblatt. Bothalia 17: 298.
RETIEF, E. 1987. A new species of Zygophyllum from southern
Africa. Bothalia 17: 189-190.
RETIEF, E. & GLEN, H.F. 1987a. Cyphostemma oleraceum. The
Flowering Plants of Africa 49: t. 1954.
RETIEF, E. & GLEN, H.F. 1987b. Cyphostemma hardyi. The
Flowering Plants of Africa 49: t. 1955.
RETIEF, E. & GLEN, H.F. 1987c. Cyphostemma juttae. The
Flowering Plants of A frica 49: t. 1956.
RUTHERFORD, M.C. 1987. South African ecology: representa-
tiveness of interests. Bulletin of the South African Institute
of Ecologists 6: 37-42.
SCHEEPERS, J.C. 1987. Grassland Biome Project: Proceedings
of the Workshop on Classification and Mapping: 20 August
1985. Occasional Report No. 16: 1—31. Ecosystems Pro-
grammes, Foundation for Research Development, CSIR,
Pretoria.
SCHRIRE, B.D. 1987a. A synopsis of Tephrosia subgenus Bar-
bistyla (Fabaceae) in southern Africa. Bothalia 17: 7-15.
SCHRIRE, B.D. 1987b. Orthographic ambiguity clarified (Cucur-
bitaceae). Bothalia 17: 181.
SODERSTROM, T.R. & ELLIS, R.P. 1987. The position of bam-
boo genera and allies in a system of grass classification. In
T.R. Soderstrom et al., Grass systematics and evolution:
225-238. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
SODERSTROM, T.R., ELLIS, R.P. & JUCZIEWICS, E.J. 1987.
The Phareae and Streptogyneae of Sri Lanka: an anatomi-
cal and morphological study. Smithsonian Contributions
to Botany 65: 1-27.
SPIES, J.J. 1987a. Lantana camara, gevaarlik in alle gedaantes.
Landbouweekblad 476: 20-22.
SPIES, J.J. 1987b. Beast disguised as beauty. Farmer’s Weekly
77018: 26-29.
SPIES, J.J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1987a Chromosome studies on
African plants. 3. Bothalia 17: 131-135.
SPIES, J.J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1987b. Chromosome studies on
African plants. 5. Bothalia 17: 257-259.
SPIES, J.J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1987c. Sterile Lantana camara:
fact or theory. South A frican Journal of Plant and Soil
4: 171-174.
SPIES, J.J. & JONKER, A. 1987. Chromosome studies on Afri-
can plants. 4. Bothalia 17: 135-136.
SPIES, J.J., STIRTON, C.H. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1987. The genus
Rubus (Rosaceae) in South Africa. IV. Natural hybridiza-
tion. Bothalia 17: 105-119.
TAYLOR, H.C. 1987. Review: The ecology and management of
biological invasions in southern Africa, edited by Mac-
donald, Kruger & Ferrar. A frican Wildlife 4: 340.
TURNER, B.J. 1987. Review: Grasses of South West Africa/
Namibia, by M.A.N. Muller. Bothalia 17: 155.
VAN ROOY, J. & MAGILL, R.E. 1987. Bryaceae. In R.E. Magill,
Flora of southern Africa , Bryophyta 1,2: 335-393. De-
partment of Agriculture and Water Supply, Republic of
South Africa.
324
VAN WYK, A.E. & PRINS, MARIE 1987. A new species of Catha
(Celastraceae) from southern Natal and Pondoland. South
African Journal of Botany 53: 202-205.
WEISSER, P.J. 1987. Dune vegetation between Richards Bay
and Mlalazi Lagoon and its conservation priorities in rela-
tion to dune mining. Natal Town and Regional Planning
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
Supplementary Report Vol. 19, pp. 71.
WELLS, M.J. 1987. The Botanical Research Institute of the De-
partment of Agriculture and Water Supply. Archimedes
29: 28-33.
WELLS, M.J. & DE BEER, H. 1987. Nasella tussock/Nasella-pol-
gras. Weeds/Onkruid A2 1/1987. Farming in South Africa.
Bothalia 18,2: 325-327 (1988)
OBITUARY
HERMANN MERXMULLER (1920-1988)
In the early hours of the morning of the 8th of Fe-
bruary 1988 Prof. Dr Hermann Merxmuller passed away
in the Polyclinic of the University of Munich after a long
serious illness. He was at the time emeritus professor of
systematic botany of the University of Munich as well as
ex-director of the Botanic Garden of Munich and the
Botanische Staatssammlung (State Herbarium), Munich.
On his retirement he had thus combined under his control
the entire research field of systematic botany in Munich.
Hermann Merxmuller (Figure 1) was bom in Munich
on the 30th of August 1920, the son of a teacher. The
family had been resident in Bavaria for many generations.
His interest in the diversity of the plant world developed
very early and even as a pupil he was a keen plant collec-
tor in the surroundings of Munich and in the Bavarian
mountains. Sympathetic teachers helped promote these
talents appreciably and at the age of 1 7 he became Mem-
ber of the Bavarian Botanical Society in which he soon
drew attention through his floristic knowledge which,
even at that stage, was remarkable. After completion of
his schooling at the renowned Ludwigs Gymnasium in
Munich the 2nd World War broke out which temporarily
made the study of biology impossible, and during the
ensuing six years allowed little time for botany. Only
after the war could Merxmuller take up a scholarship of
the distinguished Maximilianeums Foundation which
provided free study to highly gifted persons.
In 1946 circumstances at last allowed him to com-
mence the study of biology at the University of Munich,
which he completed in a remarkably short time in 1951
with a doctoral dissertation for which he was awarded
the highest mark, summa cum laude. His dissertation
dealt with problems of plant distribution in the Alps and
soon earned him high esteem in scientific circles. Since
1948 he had close ties with the Botanische Staatssamm-
lung, which at the time was under the directorship of
Karl Suessenguth, and shortly after his graduation he
took up a position as scientific assistant at this institute.
It was Suessenguth, who directed Merxmuller’s sights
towards Africa, because he had decided relatively late in
life to work on the flora of South West Africa in Munich
and to compile a Prodromus for the region. This new
goal of the Botanische Staatssammlung soon resulted in
Merxmuller’s involvement in southern African plant
groups. His early interest in complex genera led him to
study the European tribes of Hieracium. Very soon he
extended this interest to the whole family Compositae.
His first publication dealing with southern African groups
was his Compositenstudien I (1950) which was a treatise
on the Compositae of the collections by Rehm from
South West Africa, Transvaal and the Cape Province.
During the following year a joint publication with his
teacher Suessenguth appeared entitled ‘A contribution
to the flora of the Marandellas District, Southern Rhode-
sia’. It was the first joint ‘finger-warming exercise’ for
the Prodromus einer Flora von Siidwestafrika. This pre-
lude led to a long series of works on the flora of southern
Africa which ended only with his Compositen-Studien
XI (1984) in which all then known changes in the Com-
positae treatment of the Prodromus are dealt with. This
central theme of Merxmuller’s research work also comes
to the fore in the second opus of his scientific career, his
inaugural dissertation, an exacting treatise which has to
be approved before admission can be gained to the teach-
ing staff of a German university. To this end Merxmuller
presented a revision of Geigeria, a southern African
genus of the Compositae.
The relatively early death of Suessenguth brought
with it several significant changes for Hermann Merx-
muller. He was appointed as head of the Botanische
Staatssammlung, and he not only considered it his duty
but it was with genuine scientific interest that he assumed
responsibility for the huge project of the ‘Prodromus
einer Flora von Siidwestafrika’. With his characteristic
energy he succeeded in publishing this fundamental over-
view in the course of six years (1966-1972). Several
journeys to South Africa and especially South West Africa
(1957/58, 1963, 1972, 1973, 1974, 1977) enabled him
to gain valuable first-hand knowledge of the plant world
of the region which became very dear to him (Figure 2).
The rich plant collections with which he returned to
Munich from these journeys formed the basis of many of
his works and led to numerous investigations into the
FIGURE 1. — Hermann Merxmiillei (1920-1988).
326
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
southern Africa flora by his collaborators. Even the first
journey resulted in the acquaintance and friendship of
many colleagues, links which lasted until his last days
and which gave vital support to the progress of his scien-
tific endeavours.
In Munich he succeeded in founding the Institut fur
Systematische Botanik at the University in 1958 and he
became its first director. Previously he had been offered
chairs of systematic botany at the renowned faculties of
Berlin and Zurich. In the following years Merxmuller
succeeded in purposefully promoting systematic research
in Munich and in a short time this city had become an
important centre for plant systematic research in central
Europe. His cosmopolitan outlook and his high scientific
repute soon led to a rapid increase in the international
contacts of the institute and the collections grew con-
siderably. Hermann Merxmuller was among those instru-
mental in aiding German botany to break out of its isola-
tion after the war and in establishing new or re-establishing
old contacts world-wide.
In addition to his research work Hermann Merxmuller
was also an eminent lecturer. His lucid, well considered
and precise delivery was highly esteemed by his students
and colleagues alike and he helped to give form and con-
tent to numerous national and international congresses.
In the University of Munich he was a valued member of
many important panels. From 1963 to 1965 he was
Dean of the Faculty of Natural Sciences and from 1963
to 1968 a member of the Senate. In 1969 he decided to
assume in addition the directorship of the Botanic Garden.
Although he would probably rather have devoted his
talents to science than to bureaucracy he saw the need
for incorporating the botanic garden in the group of
three institutes in Munich devoted to systematic botany.
In the following year he could thus welcome many guests
from all corners of the earth at the 7th congress of
AETFAT as host of three houses. It gave him great
pleasure to organize this congress which focussed on the
heart of his scientific interest, the African flora.
At this time of his most active scientific endeavour
the two most prominent characteristics of Merxmuller
were particularly well defined: his ability to recall almost
every plant he had ever seen and his faculty for scientific
synthesis, which, combined with his vast knowledge of
literature, resulted in an extraordinary insight into cor-
relations in the plant kingdom. Unfortunately he was
not granted the opportunity to shape this knowledge
into a lasting work for which he had drawn up plans.
Only the recollections of many lectures, conversations
and discussions therefore remain.
Hermann Merxmuller has been honoured often and in
various ways for his scientific achievements. Only the
following will be singled out in the present context: the
Bavarian Order of Merit (1983), the Jubilee Medal of the
National Botanic Gardens of South Africa (1963) and
the Special Award of the South African Association of
Botanists (1982). Hermann Merxmuller was member of
numerous scientific societies and of several academies.
Since 1980 he suffered increasingly from chronic
ailments. He therefore decided in 1985 to relinquish his
positions at the University, in the State Herbarium and
FIGURE 2.— Prof. H. Merxmul-
ler in Sperrgebiet No. 1,
SWA/Namibia, flats west
of Buntfeldschuh, with a
specimen of Othonna fur-
cata (Lindl.) Druce in full
flower, 1972.09.12. Photo:
W. Giess.
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
327
in the Garden. Relieved of the burden of these positions
he had hoped to devote his remaining strength exclusive-
ly to botany. But unfortunately these hopes were not to
be fulfilled. Every visit to the hospital during the last
three years increasingly reduced his strength. Finally he
even had to experience the loss of most of his eyesight,
his most crucial contact with the world. To us who had
to observe this development, it appeared to be a particu-
larly cruel fate.
Southern African botany has lost in Hermann Merx-
miiller a scientist who has in the course of the past 25
years made significant contributions to its furtherance.
He was always a true friend of this region to which he
was emotionally strongly attached, an attachment that
lasted unflinchingly till the very end.
Selected literature on southern Africa
MERXMULLER, H. 1950. Compositen-Studien I. Mitteilungen
ms der Botanischen Staatssammlung, Munchen 1: 33-46.
SUESSENGUTH, K. & MERXMULLER, H. 1951. A contribution
to the flora of the Marandellas District, Southern Rhodesia.
Transactions of the Rhodesia Scientific Association XLIII:
1-86.
MERXMULLER, H. 1953. Compositen-Studien III. Revision der
Gattung Geigeria Griesselich. Mitteilungen aus der Bota-
nischen Staatssammlung, Munchen 1: 239-316.
MERXMULLER, H. (ed.) 1966-1972. Prodromus einer Flora
von Siidwestafrika. J. Cramer, Lehre.
MERXMULLER, H. & ROESSLER, H. 1984. Compositen-Studien
XI. Neue Ubersicht der Compositen Siidwestafrikas. Mit-
teilungen aus der Botanischen Staatssammlung, Munchen
20: 61-96.
JURKEGRAU*
(Translation: O.A. Leistner)
* Professor of Botany, Institut fur Systematische Botanik der
Universitat Munchen, Menzinger Strasse 67, D-8000 Munchen
19, West Germany BRD.
Bothalia 18,2: 329-332 (1988)
Book Reviews
THE ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF BIOLOGICAL IN-
VASIONS IN SOUTHERN AFRICA by I.A.W. MACDONALD,
F.J. KRUGER & A. A. FERRAR (eds). 1986. Oxford University
Press, Harrington House, Barrack St, Cape Town 8001. Pp. 324
(+ xvi), 44 figures, 83 tables, 6 appendices, 2 indexes. Size 205
X 260 mm. Price: hard cover R45,00 +GST.
This book is ‘the first attempt to synthesize available infor-
mation on the invasion of southern Africa’s natural systems by
introduced organisms.’ It represents the South African contri-
bution to the international project co-ordinated by SCOPE
(Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment) to
examine the global ecology of invasive plants, animals and
micro-organisms. The book has been compiled in response to
a rapidly increasing realization world-wide, but particularly in
southern Africa, that certain introduced species present a real
ecological and economic threat to agricultural and conservation
activities. The idea for the project was originally conceived at the
Third International Conference on Mediterranean Ecosystems
held in South Africa in 1980. During the following years work-
shops were convened to collate unpublished information and in
November, 1985, a National Symposium on the Ecology of
Biological Invasions was held in Stellenbosch. This book records
the proceedings of the symposium.
It says much for the industry and organization of the partici-
pants, that a volume of this scope and magnitude has been pro-
duced in the short space of five years. The editors, I.A.W. Mac-
donald, F.J. Kruger and A.A. Ferrar, are South African bio-
logists of standing. Their team of no less than 50 authors are
leaders in their fields at South African universities and research
institutes; the 45 specialist referees hail from a wide range of
overseas countries with a few from South Africa. Together
they have succeeded in producing a timely, uniquely South
African work of high quaJity, interest and relevance. In these
days when symposium papers are so often published in camera-
ready form from a variety of typescripts, put together with a
minimum of editing, it is a joy to come across a book that has
uniform, clear, double-column print and is virtually free from
printer’s devils — I spotted only two misprints! The book’s
value as a work of reference is assured by the two comprehen-
sive indexes, a biological index to every genus and species men-
tioned in the text, and a subject index, amply cross-referenced
and often subindexed under major topics such as birds, fire,
weeds and the various biomes. One criticism here — the lack
of a separate glossary. The brief explanation of terms given in
the Introduction could, in my opinion, have been more crisply
dealt with in a glossary, to which could have been added a num-
ber of common words used in a circumscribed sense defined in
the text, such as transformer species, pests and nuisance animals,
processes, impacts and many more.
The 25 chapters, mostly multi-authored, are grouped into six
parts that deal with historical perspectives, faunal invasions, in-
vasions at the biome level, understanding the ecology of inva-
sions, impacts of invasions and finally managing invasive alien
plants.
Following this logical sequence we read first about the role of
people in introducing new species to South Africa — ‘tracing
what is known of the timing, location, rate and extent of spread,
and the modes of and motivation for their introduction.’ It may
surprise many to learn that Van Riebeeck’s oaks were by no
means the first aliens. Domestic animals arrived with the Khoi
pastoral peoples about 2000 years ago and Bantu-speaking
farmers in the Early Iron Age, a thousand years before Van Rie-
beeck, brought crop plants and perhaps weeds. But the principal
introductions occurred after European settlement and especially
during Victorian times. Indeed, leading figures of the day, in
their zeal to clothe the treeless slopes and to improve the ameni-
ties of the Cape, were often major but unwitting culprits. Baron
von Ludwig and the Director of the Cape Town Botanical Garden
between them probably imported many of the invasive Acacias,
Hakeas and Leptospermum laevigatum, and Rhodes introduced
the European Starling! Most of these introductions were, of
course, for utilitarian purposes and, considering the enormous
variety of plant species introduced, comparatively few of them
have become invasive.
Compared with plants, the number of terrestrial vertebrates
that have invaded South African ecosystems, outside man-
modified areas, is limited, probably because Africa’s large suite
of indigenous animals makes it difficult for aliens to establish
themselves. In southern Africa’s aquatic systems, however, ani-
mal invasions have been significant. These and similar topics are
discussed and speculated upon in the second part of the book.
In part three, invasions are documented on a biome basis.
This approach is of value because it brings out the contrasting
suites of species characteristic of the different biomes and in so
doing raises intriguing practical and theoretical questions, the
solutions to which might usefully be extrapolated to similar
biomes elsewhere in Africa and further afield.
The next section reviews our current understanding of local
biological invasions in order to try and predict suitable guide-
lines for their future management and prevention. Processes and
functional features of invasive plants and animals are discussed
in detail but one concludes regretfully that we do not yet know
enough to formulate really effective management principles.
Little has been done to evaluate ecological and economic im-
pacts, partly because it is difficult to find suitable control areas
with the full range of densities that need testing. Also, monitor-
ing has not yet been of sufficient duration to provide more than
preliminary conclusions. Hence, authors have often had to turn
to the long-term experiments in hydrology and sylviculture to
find evidence for the impacts of plant invasions. Breytenbach,
in his perceptive account of impacts on terrestrial ecosystems,
points out that aliens are not effective invaders simply because
of inherent traits of the alien itself but also because they disrupt
ecological processes. Similarly some control measures may have
a greater impact on processes than the alien has, therefore an
effective control strategy should not merely get rid of the alien
but should at the same time have minimal effect on the native
community. In their paper on impacts in aquatic ecosystems,
Ashton and co-authors discuss the special attributes and con-
ditions that enable aquatic invasives to be so successfuL One
of these is undoubtedly the growing number of dams, reser-
voirs and inter-catchment transfer schemes that have created
completely new habitats where aggressive invaders may have
an advantage over native species in establishment and spread;
another is the progressive deterioration in water quality in many
rivers, enabling alien organisms suited to eutrophic conditions
to flourish.
To conservation practitioners, the last section of the book,
on managing invasive alien plants, is most important. It is now
accepted that eradication of invaders that have become firmly
established is beyond our means. Moreover, some invaders are
useful to man in certain circumstances, harmful in others. The
wise course, then, is to learn to live with them, but on our terms.
Hence, this part of the book considers methods of control.
Mechanical and chemical control receive little attention, not
because they lack merit but because each tends to be specific
to a particular case, local in application, generating little in the
way of general principles. Similarly, legislative control measures
have not been dealt with, simply because no scientific study of
the efficacy of existing laws has been made. Instead, these final
chapters describe the biological control methods that have had
a long and generally successful history in southern Africa, parti-
cularly with woody and cactoid plant invaders. One of these
chapters, by Neser & Kluge, deals specifically with the use of
seed-attacking organisms. In the past, seed-attackers have rated
poorly in comparison with organisms that inflict direct damage
to the vital vascular or mechanical support systems of the target
plant. More recent research has shown, however, that seed-
attacking organisms, by reason of their great number and variety,
330
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
and their release from predator pressure when introduced to a
new range, can make a positive contribution to biocontrol, parti-
cularly as a means of reducing the invasions of potentially useful
alien woody plants. One ingenious example is the proposed re-
lease of bruchid beetles which destroy the seed of Prosopis velu-
tina without affecting the fodder value of the pod. This would
allow the continued use of the species while controlling its spread.
The ultimate refinement in managing invasive species is, of
course, to devise an integrated plan of control by drawing upon
past experience and research in every relevant field. The final
chapter of the book gives guidelines for such a plan. In the past
there has been a preoccupation with the means or ‘options’ for
control (mechanical, chemical, biological etc.) but latterly two
other considerations are seen as being equally important. There
must be, firstly, a thorough understanding of the biology of the
target plant and, secondly, a careful consideration of all the
possible consequences that the control measures may have. But
no plan, however all-embracing, can be effective without the
final ingredient — a well defined objective; and, since eradica-
tion is now accepted as being generally unattainable, that ob-
jective must be to define clearly the level of control required.
Most chapters have good visual explanatory material: figures
and tables are relevant, clearly presented and usually simple to
understand. There are no photographs; indeed, in a volume of
this nature they are unnecessary and would only have increased
the cost of the book. At R45,00, this locally produced volume
is still reasonably priced compared to texts published overseas
today; and what’s more, in quality it surpasses many overseas
productions.
Considering the diverse authorship, the editors have succeed-
ed in maintaining a fairly homogeneous format in the content
of the papers. A certain amount of variation in style is unavoid-
able but generally the standard of writing is good ‘sciencese.’
Gems such as ‘a considerable expansion of the data base will
have to be made’ for ‘we need more facts’ are mercifully rare.
I preferred the papers that formulated hypotheses (kite-fliers
if you like) to those that were largely a recitation of statistics.
A refrain that occurs with almost depressing regularity in
the chapters that relate research findings is the need for more
research. It’s true that we are now only beginning to under-
stand the complexity of biological invasions; only beginning
to realize that there is not one ‘optimal strategy’ but several.
Until problems are further unravelled, ad hoc measures must be
taken, but we need to be conservative, even cautious, in manage-
ment and especially in introducing new organisms to the region.
Some questions that the man in the street may ask, like
‘what’s wrong with aliens anyway?’ will be answered fully but
not succinctly in this book; to others, such as ‘what will happen
in the long term?’ no simple answer is yet in sight, and a study of
this book will explain why. Indeed, this erudite volume contains
something for everyone concerned about the conservation of the
organisms, biotas and habitats of our land.
[A shortened version of this review appeared in A frican Wildlife
41: 340 (1987).]
H.C. TAYLOR
FLORA OF AUSTRALIA (Vol. 45), Hydatellaceae to Liliaceae,
edited by ALEXANDER S. GEORGE. 1987 . Australian Govern-
ment Publishing Service, G.P.O. Box 84, Canberra, A.C.T. 2601.
Pp. 521, line drawings and 20 colour photographs, 57 scanning
electron micrographs, 477 maps. Price: soft cover edn $A 44.95;
casebound edition $A 54.95.
This volume, the eighth, is the largest to be published in the
series thus far and completes the treatment of Liliales begun in
Volume 46 (published 1986). The small orders Hydatellales,
Typhales, Bromeliales and Zingiberales are also included, giving
a total of 12 families, 98 genera and 404 species as well as many
infraspecific taxa. There are 36 contributors. Because the Flora
is arranged according to Cronquist, An integrated system of clas-
sification of flowering plants (1981), the family Liliaceae is here
treated in the very widest sense, and includes such well recognized
families as Amaryllidaceae, Alstroemeriaceae and Hypoxidaceae
as well as the numerous narrowly-defined families recognized by
Dahlgren et al. in The Families of the Monocotyledons (1985).
However, the reasons for adopting the former classification are
clear, and there is a useful listing of the Liliaceae genera included
in the Flora (pp. 149-151) with their equivalent families sensu
Dahlgren et al.
The uniqueness of Australia’s flora is illustrated by the follow-
ing figures: of the 266 species of Liliaceae here recognized, 76%
are endemic while an incredible 17% are naturalized introduc-
tions, many from South Africa or South America. Only 7% of
the species are common to neighbouring territories, including
New Zealand and ‘Malesia’, i.e. the territories included in Flora
Malesiana.
As with preceding volumes, there is consistency in style and
layout, with the use of simple descriptive terms, the grouping of
distribution maps after the text, and new taxa, new combinations
and lectotypifications placed in the appendix, followed by a
useful supplementary glossary and list of abbreviations and con-
tractions. The line drawings are of a consistently high standard
and the five pages of colour photographs following the intro-
duction, provide additional interest. The dust jacket and frontis-
piece bear an attractive colour painting of Johnsonia lupulina
R. Br., one of the included species.
This is a well produced, concise and simple-to-use Flora and
should stimulate worldwide interest in Australia’s unique floral
wealth.
C. REID
THE BOTANY OF THE COMMELINS, by D.O. WIJNANDS.
1983. A.A. Balkema, P.O. Box 1675, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Pp. 232, 64 colour plates. Price: R70,00 +GST.
It is rather late to review a book published in 1983, but since
it is important to South African botany and has not yet been
reviewed in this country and the author, Dr Wijnands, has per-
sonally expressed surprise at this omission, the Editor felt that
a review was desirable even at this late stage.
The Botany of the Commelins deals with the exotic plants
cultivated in the Hortus Medicus Amstelodamensis and illustrat-
ed in the codex. Moninckx Atlas, and the four books produced
by Jan and Caspar Commelin, namely the two volumes of Hortus
Amstelodamensis, the Praeludia Botanica and Plantae Rariores
et Exoticae. In the dust jacket blurb it is stated that the water-
colours were painted between 1686—1709, but on the title page
the' dates given are 1682-1710. Dr Wijnands’s task was to identify
the plants depicted and to comment on their taxonomy, nomen-
clature and history.
Part 1 of the book is devoted to history and includes four
chapters. In the first chapter, Wijnands describes the Hortus
Medicus Amstelodamensis. He points out that although the
garden was founded primarily for medical purposes, botanical
interests played a conspicuous part in the development of the
garden. In Chapters 2 and 3, biographies of Jan and Caspar
Commelin are provided with particular reference to their asso-
ciation with the garden. In Chapter 4 the nine volumes of the
Moninckx Atlas are described in detail together with an account
of the artists responsible for the illustrations. Of the nine volumes,
only eight are related to the Commelin period.
Part 2 covers the taxonomy and nomenclature and includes
chapters on the influence of the Commelin books, notes on
typification, presentation of the texts on the watercolours and
engravings and, the major part of the book (172 pages), a dis-
cussion of the plants. The plants are dealt with in alphabetical
order by family.
In Chapter 6 on typification, Wijnands points out that the
choice of illustrations as nomenclatural types is common prac-
tice today, but there is still diffidence among some botanists
about designating illustrations as lectotypes, although the Code
(Article 7.2) and ‘Guide for the determination of types (T4b)’
clearly permit this. Wijnands contests the preference given to
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
331
specimens over descriptions and illustrations (l.c. T4b) in cases
where there is no concrete evidence that the author saw the
specimens. Also in this chapter, Wijnands refers to the impor-
tance of specimens in the Van Royen Herbarium in Leiden to
Linnaean typification. This is in contrast to Steam’s opinion
(Facsimile edition of Species plantarum, 105, 1957) that the Van
Royen Herbarium is only indirectly relevant to Linnaeus’s work
since it was not studied by him. Wijnands states that there are
2 000-3 000 specimens in the herbarium which are relevant to
Linnaean typification, some 150 of which may even be holotypes.
Wijnands points out that Linnaeus was familiar with the living
collection at Leiden and that the Van Royen Herbarium was at
Linnaeus’s disposal, since it is listed in his preface to Species
plantarum.
Following Part 2 are three appendices, the most useful prob-
ably being Appendix C, the key to the Moninckx Atlas and
Commelin volumes, where all the plant names are listed to-
gether with the corresponding volume, page and figure/tab.
numbers in the two sets of publications. Finally, there are 64
full-colour reproductions from the Moninckx Atlas.
Why is this book so important to South African botany?
The reason is simple: of the 420 plants illustrated from the
Hortus Medicus Amstelodamensis, 229 species originated from
South Africa — mainly introductions by Simon and Willem
Adriaan van der Stel. Commelin plates are important in that
Linnaeus cited 259 out of the toted of 305 plates published by
the Commelins and therefore an understanding of these plates
is of fundamental significance for the interpretation and some-
times typification of many of the Linnaean species. A quick
scan through Wijnands’s book shows that 41 South African
species are typified by Commelin plates.
Wijnands has made a very thorough investigation of the typi-
fication of a great number of the species illustrated in the Com-
melin works and his findings concerning the South African
species reflect rather badly on South African taxonomy. A list
of the South African botanists who have perpetrated blunders
in typification would be most revealing. The reviewer shame-
facedly admits to being one of the guilty parties, but fortunate-
ly in one instance only. There is perhaps some consolation in the
fact that one of the chief errors in typification probably con-
cerns the uncritical designation of specimens in the Linnaean
Herbarium (LINN) as types — an error committed world-wide
in years gone by.
For the reviewer, Wijnands’s book with its many cases of
carefully worked out typification serves as an instructive course
in the typification of Linnaean species. Rather than attempt to
give a coherent account of the guidelines and principles adopted
by Wijnands, the reviewer will merely enumerate important
points with examples.
1. Wijnands clearly recognizes the importance of the nomen
specificum legitimum (NSL), the phrase name, as many of his
examples show.
2. He freely describes pre-Linnaean illustrations as holotypes,
syntypes or lectotypes, whichever is applicable. (Although il-
lustrations are acceptable type elements (Article 7.2 & 7.3), it
is strange that the definition of a syntype in the Code (Article
7.7) refers only to specimens.)
When two or more elements are cited in a protologue in Species
plantarum , Wijnands treats them as syntypes — whether they
are pre-Linnaean illustrations or vouching specimens (Wijnands’s
term for specimens corresponding to pre-Linnaean references)
— along with any available specimens in LINN. From these syn-
types, he designates a lectotype.
3. One should only accept a specimen in LINN as type if the
number on the sheet agrees with the serial number in Species
plantarum. Ignorance of this requirement has undoubtedly been
responsible for many of the errors in Linnaean typification in
the past.
4. Many specimens in LINN were received by Linnaeus only
after 1753 e.g. specimens from Patrick Browne and Tulbagh and
are consequently ineligible as types.
5. Discrepancies between LINN specimens and the protologue
in Species plantarum in the presence or absence of organs, should
be taken into account. For example, in the case of Epiphyllum
phyllanthus, p. 55, Wijnands rejects LINN 633.5, not definitely
known to have been available in 1753, because it has a flower
which is not mentioned in the diagnosis.
However, in the case of Papaver orientale, p. 160, Wijnands
accepts as correct the designation by Goldblatt of LINN 669.10
as lectotype even though the specimen has no fruits, which con-
flicts with (1) Linnaeus’s descriptive note to the effect that the
specimen has 16 stigmata and hispid capsules and (2) the NSL
where the capsule is described as glabrous. This seems to be an
inconsistent attitude to protologue-specimen discrepancy.
6. When the NSL is new and does not match phrase names in
pre-Linnaean citations, Wijnands usually accepts the appropriate
authentic specimen in LINN as the type, e.g. Justicia hyssopi-
folia, p. 32. In the case of Physocarpus opulifolius, p. 183, where
LINN 651.12(6) is proposed as the lectotype, the specimen in
Hortus Siccus Cliffortianus (HSC) 190.3 is regarded as the para-
type (or lectoparatype).
Proiphys amboinensis, p. 40, has a new NSL, but no specimen
is preserved in LINN, consequently the only element cited, a
Commelin plate, is the holotype. Roella ciliata, p. 62, also has a
new NSL, but there is no specimen in LINN nor is there a speci-
men corresponding to Hort. Cliff. 492, so Wijnands has selected
Ehret’s illustration in Hort. Cliff, t. 35, as lectotype.
7. If the NSL is repeated unchanged in the Species plantarum
from one of the pre-Linnaean citations, then the corresponding
vouching specimen for that citation is the obvious candidate for
selection as lectotype. Frequently the NSL is copied directly
from Hort. Cliff, and the corresponding specimen in HSC is
then nominated as lectotype, e.g. Athanasia dentata, p. 69. In
some cases, e.g. Diosma hirta , p. 184 and Cupressus disticha,
p. 196, a duplicate specimen of the HSC lectotype, designated
by Wijnands, exists in LINN and is treated as an isotype (or
isolectotype).
On occasions there is no vouching specimen corresponding to
the copied pre-Linnaean citation and another syntype must then
be designated as lectotype, e.g. Amaryllis zeylanica, p. 37, where
there is no specimen in Herbarium Van Royen corresponding to
Flora Leydensis prodromus etc. (1740) and a Commelin plate is
designated as lectotype.
Sometimes the vouching specimen has to be rejected because
it does not agree with the NSL e.g. in the case of Lathy rus odo-
ratus, p. 164, the specimen HSC 368.9 has no fruits whereas the
NSL describes the fruits as hirsute. Therefore, Wijnands proposed
LINN 905.12(11) with pods as lectotype.
The decision whether to choose a vouching specimen from a
pre-Linnaean citation or an available specimen in LINN, can
sometimes be influenced by another element in the protologue.
For example, in Clutia alatemoides, p. 95, the NSL is taken un-
changed from Hort. Cliff , but Linnaeus used Commelin’s Alater-
noides africana ...’ in Hort. Med. Amst. 2, p. 3, fig. 9 as epithet
and the relevant plate, fig. 9, certainly contributed to Linnaeus’s
concept of the species. There is an available specimen in LINN
1206.2 with correct serial number 1, but it does not match Com-
melin’s plate all that closely. Therefore, since the NSL comes
from Hort. Cliff, Wijnands chooses HSC 444.1 as lectotype.
However, this must be a mistake because HSC 500 is the speci-
men corresponding to Hort. Cliff. 500 from which the phrase-
name is taken — not HSC 444.1. Also, Wijnands clearly states
that ‘the last specimen (HSC 500) matches the Commelin plate’.
8. When a pre-Linnaean illustration is used as lectotype, Wijnands
usually tries to locate the typotype e.g. Conocarpus erecta, p. 66.
Wijnands’s interpretation of the typification undertaken by
some taxonomists is sometimes difficult to accept. For example,
in the case of Felicia fruticosa (L.) Nichols., p. 275, Grau who
revised the genus, cited two types for Aster fruticosus L., the
basionym, namely LINN 997.6 & 7, which he had not seen.
Wijnands rejects this typification because it was not based on a
single specimen and therefore designates the specimen HSC
332
Bothalia 18,2 (1988)
409.17 corresponding to the Hort. Cliff, citation (from which
the NSL was taken unchanged) as type. If Grau intended lecto-
typifying A. fruticosus by the two specimens, he was clearly
contravening the Code which states (Article 7.5) that a lecto-
type is ‘a specimen or other element’ i.e. a single element. How-
ever, it is not at all clear that Grau was in fact designating the
LINN specimens as lectotypes. Elsewhere in his revision, he clearly
indicates lectotypification by writing ‘lecto.’ in brackets after
the specimen designated. It would appear, therefore, that Grau
was merely citing what in his opinion were two syntypes, though
strangely enough in his whole revision, there is no other instance
where he cites two specimens as types. Whatever the situation,
Wijnands was correct in designating the HSC specimen as type,
because neither of the two LINN specimens bears the serial
number 5 given in Species plantarum and is therefore eligible as
a type element.
An obvious misinterpretation of the Code is made by Wijnands
on p. 192. He states that the combination Agathelpis dubia (L.)
Hutch. (1946) is not validly published, because Hutchinson did
not cite the basionym Selago dubia L. Wijnands rectifies the omis-
sion by citing the basionym and adding ‘ex Wijnands’ to the
author citation. However, Article 33.2 of the Code states that
the citation of the basionym is only obligatory after 1953, there-
fore Hutchinson’s combination is validly published.
My only criticism of the book is that I had to search the text
to ascertain which four books by the Commelins, apart from the
Moninckx Atlas, were covered in Wijnands’s treatment. This in-
formation was not provided in the dust jacket blurb, on the
title page, or in the introduction. Not even in Chapter 5, where
Wijnands discusses the influence of the Commelin books, is this
information available. Eventually I found the information scat-
tered through the text, but spelt out in Appendix C. Surely such
information, part of the subject of the book, should be made
known early and clearly.
An incredible amount of in-depth research has gone into the
preparation of this book and Dr Wijnands is to be congratulated
on a book which is bound to become a classic in its own right.
D.J.B. KILLICK
BOTHALIA
Volume 18,2
CONTENTS— INHOUD
Oct./Okt. 1988
1. A revision of the genus Prionanthium (Poaceae: Arundineae). GERRIT DAVIDSE 143
2. Studies in the genus Riccia (Marchantiales) from southern Africa. 10. Two new white-scaled species of
the group ‘Squamatae’: R. argenteolimbata and R. albomata. O.H. VOLK, S.M. PEROLD and
T. BORNEFELD 155
3. Taxonomy and leaf anatomy of the genus Ehrharta (Poaceae) in southern Africa: the Dura group. G.E.
GIBBS RUSSELL and R.P. ELLIS 165
4. The Oxygonum dregeanum complex (Polygonaceae). G. GERMISHUIZEN 173
5. Notes on African plants:
Brassicaceae. Heliophila cornellsbergia , a new species from the Richtersveld. B.J. PIENAAR and
A. NICHOLAS 183
Ericaceae. Coilostigma zeyherianum — a correction. E.G.H. OLIVER 185
Geraniaceae. The correct author citation for Pelargonium section Otidia. P. VORSTER 186
Orchidaceae. Additions to the synonymy of Eulophia schweinfurthii. A. V. HALL 186
Polygonaceae. Reinstatement of Oxygonum acetosella Welw. G. GERMISHUIZEN 187
6. Fusarium tricinctum (Fungi: Hyphomycetes) in South Africa — morphology and pathogenicity.
SANDRA C. LAMPRECHT, W.F.O. MARASAS, P.S. VAN WYK and P.S. KNOX-DAVIES 189
7. Leaf anatomy of the South African Danthonieae (Poaceae). XVII. The genus Chaetobromus . R.P. ELLIS 195
8. Flora of the Zuurberg National Park; 1. Characterization of major vegetation units. B-E. VAN WYK,
P.A. NOVELLIE and C.M. VAN WYK 211
9. Flora of the Zuurberg National Park. 2. An annotated checklist of ferns and seed plants. B-E. VAN
WYK, C.M. VAN WYK and P.A. NOVELLIE 221
10. A synopsis of the plant communities of Swartboschkloof, Jonkershoek, Cape Province. D.J. McDONALD 233
11. A checklist of the flowering plants and ferns of Swartboschkloof, Jonkershoek, Cape Province. D.J.
McDONALD and M. MORLEY 261
12. Threatened plants of the eastern Cape: a synthesis of collection records. D.A. EVERARD 271
13. Description of a proteoid-restioid stand in Mesic Mountain Fynbos of the south-western Cape and some
aspects of its ecology. G. DAVIS 279
14. Miscellaneous notes:
The plant number scale — an improved method of cover estimation using variable -sized belt tran-
sects. R.H. WESTFALL and M.D. PANAGOS : . . . 289
15. New taxa, new records and name changes for southern African plants. G.E. GIBBS RUSSELL, W.G.
WELMAN, G. GERMISHUIZEN, E. RETIEF, B.J. PIENAAR, C. REID, L. FISH, J. VAN ROOY,
C.M. VAN WYK, E. KALAKE and STAFF 293
16. Annual report of the Botanical Research Institute 1987/88 305
17. Obituary: Hermann Merxmuller (1920— 1988). JURKE GRAU (Translation: O.A. Leistner) 325
18. Book reviews 329
Abstracted, indexed or listed in Biological Abstracts, Current Advances in Plant Science, Current Contents, Field Crop Abstracts, Forestry
Abstracts, Herbage Abstracts, Excerpta Botanica, Revue of Plant Pathology, Revue of Medical and Veterinary Mycology and The Kew
Record of Taxonomic Literature.
ISSN 0006 8241 PRICE R15.00 (GST excL)
© and published by Botanical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and Water Supply, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001, South
Africa. Printed by the Government Printer, Bosman Street, Private Bag X85, Pretoria 0001. Tel. 323-9731 X 267. Obtainable from the
Division of Agricultural Information, Department of Agriculture and Water Supply, Private Bag X144, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.