Bothalia
’N TYDSKRIF VIR PLANTKUNDIGE NAVORSING
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Vol. 23,2
Oct./Okt. 1 993
TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE NATIONAL BOTANICAL INSTITUTE, PRETORIA
TEGNIESE PUBLIKASIES VAN DIE NASIONALE BOTANIESE INSTITUUT, PRETORIA
Obtainable from the National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XI 01,
Pretoria 0001, Republic of South Africa. A catalogue of all available
publications will be issued on request.
BOTHALIA
Bothalia is named in honour of General Louis Botha, first Premier and
Minister of Agriculture of the Union of South Africa. This house journal
of the National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, is devoted to the furtherance
of botanical science. The main fields covered are taxonomy, ecology,
anatomy and cytology. Two parts of the journal and an index to contents,
authors and subjects are published annually.
A booklet of the contents to Vols 1-20 is available.
Verkrygbaar van die Nasionale Botaniese Instituut, Privaatsak X101,
Pretoria 000 1 , Republiek van Suid-Afrika. 'n Katalogus van alle beskik-
bare publikasies kan aangevra word.
Bothalia is vemoem ter ere van Generaal Louis Botha, eerste Eerste
Minister en Minister van Landbou van die Unie van Suid-Afrika. Hierdie
lyfblad van die Nasionale Botaniese Instituut, Pretoria, is gewy aan die
bevordering van die wetenskap van plantkunde. Die hoofgebiede wat
gedek word, is taksonomie, ekologie, anatomie en sitologie. Twee dele
van die tydskrif en ’n indeks van die inhoud, outeurs en onderwerpe
verskyn jaarliks.
'n Inhoudsopgawe tot volumes 1-20 is beskikbaar.
MEMOIRS OF THE BOTANICAL SURVEY OF SOUTH AFRICA
The memoirs are individual treatises usually of an ecological nature, but
sometimes dealing with taxonomy or economic botany.
THE FLOWERING PLANTS OF AFRICA (FPA)
This serial presents colour plates of African plants with accompanying
text. The plates are prepared mainly by the artists at the National
Botanical Institute. Many well known botanical artists have contributed
to the series, such as Cythna Letty (over 700 plates), Kathleen Lansdell,
Stella Gower, Betty Connell, Peter Bally and Fay Anderson. The Editor
is pleased to receive living plants of general interest or of economic value
for illustration.
Twenty plates are published annually.
An index to Vols 1 — 49 is available.
FLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA (FSA)
A taxonomic treatise on the flora of the Republic of South Africa,
Ciskei, Transkei. Lesotho, Swaziland, Bophuthatswana, Namibia,
Botswana and Venda. The FSA contains descriptions of families, genera,
species, infraspecific taxa, keys to genera and species, synonymy, liter-
ature and limited specimen citations, as well as taxonomic and ecological
notes.
Contributions to the FSA will also appear in Bothalia.
PALAEOFLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA
A palaeoflora on a pattern comparable to that of the Flora of
southern Africa. Much of the information is presented in the form
of tables and photographic plates depicting fossil populations. Now
available:
’n Reeks van losstaande omvattende verhandelings oor vemaamlik eko-
logiese, maar soms ook taksonomiese of plantekonomiese onderwerpe.
Hierdie reeks bied kleurplate van Afrikaanse plante met bygaande teks.
Die skilderye word meestal deur die kunstenaars van die Nasionale
Botaniese Instituut voorberei. Talle bekende botaniese kunstenaars het
tot die reeks bygedra, soos Cythna Letty (meer as 700 plate), Kathleen
Lansdell, Stella Gower, Betty Connell, Peter Bally en Fay Anderson. Die
Redakteur verwelkom lewende plante van algemene belang of ekono-
miese waarde vir afbeelding.
Twintig plate word jaarliks gepubliseer.
'n Indeks tot volumes 1-49 is beskikbaar.
’n Taksonomiese verhandeling oor the flora van die Republiek van
Suid-Afrika, Ciskei, Transkei. Lesotho, Swaziland, Bophuthatswana,
Namibie, Botswana en Venda. Die FSA bevat beskrywings van families,
genusse, spesies, infraspesifteke taksons, sleutels tot genusse en spesies,
sinonimie, literatuur. verwysings na enkele eksemplare. asook beknopte
taksonomiese en ekologiese aantekeninge.
Bydraes tot die FSA sal ook in Bothalia verskyn.
’n Palaeoflora met ‘n uitleg vergelykbaar met die van die Flora van
suidelike Afrika. Baie van die inligting word aangebied in die vorm van
tabelle en fotografiese plate waarop fossiele populasies afgebeeld word.
Reeds beskikbaar:
Molteno Formation (Triassic) Vol. 1. Introduction. Dicroidium , by/deur J.M. & H.M. Anderson.
Molteno Formation (Triassic) Vol. 2. Gymnosperms (excluding Dicroidium). by/deur J.M. & H.M. Anderson.
Prodromus of South African Megafloras. Devonian to Lower Cretaceous, by/deur J.M. & H.M. Anderson. Obtain-
able from/Beskikbaar van: A. A. Balkema Marketing, Box/Posbus 317, Claremont 7735, RSA.
ANNALS OF KIRSTENBOSCH BOTANIC GARDENS
A series devoted to the publication of monographs and major works on
southern African flora. Published: Vol. 14—19 (earlier volumes published
as Supplementary volumes to the Journal of South African Botany)
'n Reeks gewy aan die publikasie van monografiee en belangrike werke
oor flora van suidelike Afrika. Gepubliseer: vol. 14—19 (vroeere volumes
gepubliseer as Supplementary volumes van die Journal of South African
Botany).
BOTH ALIA
’N TYDSKRIF VIR PLANTKUNDIGE NAVORSING
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Volume 23,2
Scientific EditorAVetenskaplike Redakteur: O.A. Leistner
Technical Editor/Tegniese Redakteur: B.A. Momberg
N A T I O N A L
INSTITUTE
2 Cussonia Avenue, Brummeria, Pretoria
Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001
ISSN 0006 8241
OctyOkt. 1993
Editorial Board/Redaksieraad
D.F. Cutler
B.J. Huntley
P.H. Raven
J.P. Rourke
M.J. Werger
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK
National Botanical Institute, Cape Town, RSA
Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, USA
Compton Herbarium, NBI, Cape Town, RSA
University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
CONTENTS-INHOUD
Volume 23,2
1. Synopsis of the genus Brachylaena (Asteraceae) in southern Africa. S.S. CILLIERS 175
2. Nomenclatural changes and additions to the genus Ophioglossum in Africa (Ophioglossaceae:
Pteridophyta). J. E. BURROWS and T. J. EDWARDS ..." 185
3. Systematic studies in the genus Mohria (Anemiaceae: Pteridophyta). IV. Comparative gametophyte
morphology in Mohria and Anemia. J.P ROUX 191
4. Synopsis of the genus Disparago (Asteraceae). M. KOEKEMOER 197
5. Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from southern Africa. 2. The genus Athalamia and A. spathysii\
the genus Oxymitra and O. cristata. S.M. PEROLD 207
6. Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from southern Africa. 3. The genus Targionia and T. hypophylla
with notes on T. lorbeeriana and Cyathodium foetidissimum (Targioniaceae). S.M. PEROLD . . . 215
7. The hepatic, Jensenia spinosa (= Pallavicinia stephanii: Pallaviciniaceae), in southern Africa. S.M.
PEROLD 223
8. Notes on African plants:
Asclepiadaceae. Validation of the combination Aspidonepsis reenensis (Asclepiadaceae): the type
species of the subgenus Unguilobium. A. NICHOLAS and D.J. GOYDER 236
Curcurbitaceae. A new species of Kedrostis from the western Cape. P. BRUYNS 233
Sapotaceae. A ‘ Bequaertiodendron by any other name? C.L. BREDENKAMP and G.F. SMITH . 235
Vitaceae. A new species of Rhoicissus from the Transvaal. E. RETIEF 231
9. The vegetation of the southern Langeberg, Cape Province. 3. The plant communities of the Bergfontein,
Rooiwaterspruit and Phesantefontein areas. D.J. MCDONALD 239
Errata in Bothalia 23,1: 157: The vegetation of the southern Langeberg, Cape Province. 2. The plant
communities of the Marloth Nature Reserve, by D.J. McDonald 263
10. The efficient use of small plots in a fynbos phytosociological study in the northern Cederberg: a quick way
to collect plant-environmental data. P.J. MUSTART, E.J. MOLL and H.C. TAYLOR 265
11. The vegetation ecology of municipal Durban, Natal. Floristic classification. D.C. ROBERTS 271
12. National Botanical Institute, South Africa: list of staff and publications 327
13. Guide for authors to Bothalia 339
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2016
https://archive.org/details/bothaliavolume2323unse_0
Bothalia 23,2: 175-184(1993)
Synopsis of the genus Brachylaena (Asteraceae) in southern Africa
S.S. CILLIERS*
Keywords: Asteraceae, Brachylaena, southern Africa, synopsis, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
A synopsis of the southern African representatives of the genus Brachylaena R. Br. (Asteraceae) is presented, in which seven
species and two subspecies are recognized. B. uniflora Harv. is placed in synonymy with B. discolor subsp. transvaalensis (Phill.
& Schweick.) J. Paiva and the division of subsp. discolor in two varieties is not accepted. Descriptions, synonymy, voucher
specimens, distribution maps, line drawings and keys to the species and subspecies are given.
UITTREKSEL
’n Sinopsis van die Suider-Afrikaanse verteenwoordigers van die genus Brachylaena R. Br. (Asteraceae) word aangebied
waarin sewe spesies en twee subspesies erken word. B. uniflora Harv. is in sinonimie met B. discolor subsp. transvaalensis
(Phill. & Schweick.) J. Paiva geplaas en die verdeling van subsp. discolor in twee varieteite. word nie aanvaar nie. Beskrywings,
sinonimie, verwysingseksemplare, verspreidingskaarte. lyndiagramme en sleutels tot die spesies en subspesies word voorsien.
INTRODUCTION
The latest taxonomic revision of all southern African
species of Brachylaena was published by Phillips &
Schweickerdt (1937). They recognized nine species in
South Africa, including a new species, B. transvaalensis
Phill. & Schweick., as well as B. discolor DC. and B.
uniflora Harv.
According to Hilliard & Burtt (1971) it is not always
possible to distinguish between B. discolor, B. uniflora
and B. transvaalensis on the basis of the characters de-
scribed by Phillips & Schweickerdt (1937). These three
species became known as the B. discolor-uniflora com-
plex, which was regarded as the only remaining taxo-
nomic problem in the genus.
In an effort to solve that problem, Paiva (1972) reduced
B. transvaalensis to subspecific rank, under B. discolor.
He also distinguished two varieties (var. mossambicensis
and var. discolor) in B. discolor subsp. discolor on the
basis of reproductive characteristics. Unfortunately he did
not study B. uniflora because it does not occur in his study
area, namely that of the Flora zambesiaca.
Hilliard (1977) did not agree with Paiva (1972) and
speculated that B. discolor and B. uniflora represented
merely the extremes in a wide range of head sizes within
the B. discolor-uniflora complex. According to Hilliard
(1977) the variation of the characteristics used by Paiva
(1972) as diagnostic, is continuous. Hilliard also men-
tioned that the variation can be interpreted in two ways:
a single species showing clinal variation in the number of
flowers in a head loosely linked to an ecological cline, or
two species which are hybridizing.
^Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Potchefstroom University for
CHE, Potchefstroom 2520.
MS. received: 1991-06-19.
Gibbs Russell et al. (1987) followed the delimitation
proposed by Paiva (1972), and recognized eight species
and four infraspecific taxa in southern Africa, including
B. discolor DC. subsp. discolor with the varieties discolor
and mossambicensis J. Paiva; subsp. transvaalensis (Phill.
& Schweick.) J. Paiva; as well as B. uniflora Harv.
The views presented here are supported by a detailed
study of the vegetative and reproductive morphology and
the anatomy of leaves and stems of the southern African
representatives of Brachylaena (Cilliers 1990). Material
was gathered during extensive field studies and loaned
from all major South African and some overseas herbaria.
A brief review is given of the research on the mor-
phology of the heads of the B. discolor-uniflora complex.
The variation of certain quantitative characters was pre-
sented in the form of dice diagrams (Radford et al. 1974)
as shown in Figure 1.
The diagrams in Figures 2 & 3 show the following:
1, on the basis of four parameters (Figures 2A-C; 3A)
the four entities clearly fall into two groups with two
members each: a, the varieties of B. discolor subsp. dis-
color, and b, B. discolor subsp. transvaalensis and B. uni-
flora',
2, the two varieties of B. discolor subsp. discolor cannot
be separated on the basis of any of the eight parameters;
3, on the basis of six of the parameters shown, B. discolor
subsp. transvaalensis and B. uniflora cannot be separated;
the number of flowers both on male and female heads,
however, indicate a discontinuity between the two entities;
4, the parameters of the male heads shown are taxonom-
ically more useful than those of the female heads, which
tend to show continuous variation; the length of the female
involucre, however, clearly supports the recognition of the
two groups mentioned under 1.
176
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
FIGURE 1. — Dice diagram to show variation in certain quantitative
characters: where: x = mean, s.e.t = standard error, c = stan-
dard deviation, and r = range (Radford et al. 1974).
On this evidence, backed by other findings by Cilliers
(1990), I propose to sink B. uniflora under B. discolor
subsp. transvaalensis and not to recognize varieties under
B. discolor subsp. discolor.
TAXONOMIC TREATMENT
Brachylaena R. Br. in Transactions of the Linnean
Society of London 12: 115 (1817); DC.: 430 (1836);
Harv.: 116 (1865); Benth. & Hook.: 228 (1873); Engl. &
Prantl: 174 (1890); Phill. & Schweick.: 206 (1937); Paiva:
368 (1972); Hilliard: 105, 106 (1977). Type species: B.
neriifolia (L.) R. Br.
Oligocarpha Cass.: 22 (1817).
Trees or shrubs, dioecious. Leaves alternate, simple,
petiolate or subsessile, entire, toothed or crenate, some-
times 3-lobed at apex, mostly coriaceous, often white- or
rusty-tomentose abaxially. Heads in open or dense axillary
or terminal racemes or panicles, rarely solitary; unisexual,
rarely with fertile hermaphrodite flowers; 1 — 30(— 50) flow-
ers per head; involucre oblong, ovoid or campanulate,
bracts in 3-7 rows, free, dry, inner ones progressively
longer. Receptacle epaleate, honeycombed. Male flowers:
corolla tubular, 3-5-lobed; anthers tailed at base, exserted;
style filiform, sometimes thickened above, simple or bifid,
branches very short, flat, acute or obtuse; ovary usually
abortive, pubescent; pappus poorly developed, of scabrid
bristles, uniseriate. Female flowers: corolla tubular, 5-
lobed; staminodes occasionally present; style filiform,
bifid, branches very short, flat, acute or obtuse. Achenes
4—5-angled, pubescent or subglabrous, glandular.
The genus consists of twelve species, confined to Af-
rica and the Mascarene Islands. Seven species are found
in southern Africa.
KEY TO SPECIES
la Leaves glabrous abaxially. if tomentose then rusty brown; male flowers with an abortive ovary (0. 7-1.9 mm long);
female flowers with staminodes (0. 6-2.0 mm long):
2a Leaf base decurrent into petiole, petiole often up to 8 mm (rarely up to 10 mm) long, not clearly distinct from leaf
base; leaf lamina 5-10 (rarely 4) times as long as broad 1.6. neriifolia
2b Leaf base acute, petiole mostly longer than 1 0 mm, clearly distinct from leaf base; leaf lamina 1 -4 times as long
as broad 2. 6. glabra
lb Leaves white-tomentose abaxially, never glabrous; ovary in male flowers, if present, shorter than 0.6 mm;
staminodes in female flowers, if present, shorter than 0.6 mm:
3a Heads in dense axillary racemes or solitary; usually less than six heads per raceme; leaf apex usually mucronate;
anthers usually shorter than 1.9 mm:
4a Involucral bracts glabrous to white-tomentulose, in 5-8 series; leaves mostly oblong; petiole up to 3 mm, rarely
up to 5 mm long; heads sometimes solitary 3.6. ilicifolia
4b Involucral bracts white-tomentose, never glabrous, in 3 or 4, rarely 5 series; leaves mostly obovate to
oblanceolate, never oblong; petiole usually longer than 5 mm; heads never solitary 4. 6. huillensis
3b Heads in open axillary or terminal racemes or panicles; usually more than eight heads per raceme or panicle; leaf
apex rarely mucronate; anthers up to 3.7 mm long:
5a Leaf apex 3-lobed or 3-toothed (leaves from coppice growth sometimes without lobes or teeth); involucral bracts
in up to 5 series in male heads, in up to 6 series in female heads 5. 6. elliptica
5b Leaf apex not 3-lobed or 3-toothed; involucral bracts in male heads in 4—10 series, in female heads in 5-10
series:
6a Leaf base obtuse to rounded; leaves mostly elliptic; outer bark dark brown to black 6. 6. rotundata
6b Leaf base decurrent into a petiole; leaves mostly oblanceolate to narrowly obovate; outer bark light grey or
light brown 7. 6. discolor
1 . Brachylaena neriifolia (L.) R. Br. in Transactions
of the Linnean Society of London 12: 115 (1817); Less.:
208 (1832); DC.: 430 (1836); Drege: 169 (1843); Sch.
Bip.: 671 (1844); Harv.: 116(1865); Bolus & Wolley-Dod
14: 277 (1904); Sim: 246 (1907); Juel: 381 (1918); Sim:
44 (1921); Phill. & Schweick.: 207 (1937). Type: Aethio-
pia |South Africa], LINN 992.2, lecto.-PRE, photo.!
Baccharis neriifolia L.: 860 (1753); Willd.: 1904 (1804); Pers.: 423
(1807); Spreng.: 462 (1826); Steud.: 178 (1841). Oligocarpha neriifolia
(L.) Cass.: 22 (1817). Conyza neriifolia (L.) L’Herit. ex Steud.: 414
(1841).
Tarchonanthus lanceolatus Thunb.: 145 (1800); Willd.: 1793 (1804);
Pers.: 405 (1807); Thunb.: 638 (1823); Spreng.: 456(1826). Type: Cape,
Thunberg s.n. (UPS, holo.-PRE (18917), photo.!).
Multistemmed shrubs or small trees (2— )4— 6(— 8) m
high; bark dark grey to brown, longitudinally fissured;
young branches with rusty brown down, glabrescent.
Leaves petiolate, oblanceolate to narrowly oblanceolate,
sometimes very narrowly elliptic or lorate, (20— )45— 110
(-180) x (5—) 1 0— 20(— 25) mm; coriaceous, glabrous adaxi-
ally, glabrous or rusty brown-tomentose abaxially; mar-
gins entire or serrated on coppice shoots, base decurrent
in a short petiole, rarely acute; petiole (3-)5-8 (-10) mm
long. Heads many, in open axillary or terminal racemes
or panicles; peduncles of male heads 1 .5— 3.0(— 5.0) mm,
and of female heads 1. 8-3.0 mm long. Involucral bracts
in 4-7 series, 2.5-3. 0(-5.0) x 2.0— 3.5(— 5.0) mm; individ-
ual bracts very narrowly to very broadly ovate, or nar-
rowly to widely elliptic, rusty brown. Flowers 8-13 in
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
177
D r
M -
T -
U -
^ I 2 3456 789 10
MALE HEADS: NUMBER OF SERIES OF
INVOLUCRAL BRACTS
INVOLUCRAL BRACTS
D
M
T
U
12 3 4 5
C MALE HEADS: PEDUNCLE LENGTH (mm)
D
M
T
u
-^3-
c
10 20 30
MALE HEADS: NUMBER OF FLOWERS
40
D
M
J[
U
12 3 4 5 6
D FEMALE HEADS: PEDUNCLE LENGTH (mm)
D
M
T
U
10
20
30
FEMALE HEADS: NUMBER OF FLOWERS
FIGURE 2. — Dice diagrams of all studied material of the B. discolor-
uniflora complex. Variation in involucral length (mm): A,
male, and B, female heads; variation in peduncle length (mm)
of C, male and D, female heads. D = B. discolor subsp. dis-
color var. discolor. ; M = B. discolor subsp. discolor var.
mossambicensis; T = B. discolor subsp. transvaalensis ; and U
= B. uniflora.
FIGURE 3. — Dice diagrams of all studied material of the B.
discolor-uniflora complex. Variation in number of se-
ries of involucral bracts: A, male, and B. female
heads; variation in number of flowers of C, male and
D, female heads. D = B. discolor subsp. discolor var.
discolor. M = B. discolor subsp. discolor var.
mossambicensis; T = B. discolor subsp. transvaalen-
sis; and U = B. uniflora.
178
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
FIGURE 4. — Brachylaena neriifolia (L.) R. Br. A, branch with leaves
and female heads, Cilliers 69: B, male head, Cilliers 73: C, fe-
male head, Cilliers 65. Scale bars: 10 mm.
male and 7-11 in female heads. Pappus 3-5 mm long.
Ovary in male flowers 0.7-1 .1 mm long, pubescent, rarely
absent, sometimes fertile. Staminodes in female flowers,
0.6-1 .0 mm. Achene oblanceolate to narrowly elliptic, 1-2
x 0.5-1. 0 mm, pubescent glandular. Flowering time: De-
cember to February. Figure 4.
Leaves from coppice growth of B. neriifolia may some-
times be confused with leaves of B. glabra. The species,
however, can usually be distinguished by the features
given in the species key.
Distribution and habitat: B. neriifolia occurs in the
southern Cape, extending from Giftberg'and Piketberg in
the north to the Storms River in the east (Figure 5). It is
common along streambanks on mountains and in forests.
Vouchers: Barker 2955 (NBG); Cilliers 72 (PUC); Orchard 543 (STE);
Paterson 1267 (GRA ); Jacot Guillarmod 8700 (GRA).
2. Brachylaena glabra (Lf) Druce in Report of
the Botanical Society and Exchange Club of the British
Isles 1916: 611 (1917); Phill. & Schweick.: 209 (1937);
Hilliard: 106 (1977). Type: Cape, Thunberg s.n. (UPS,
holo.-PRE (microfiche 18914!).
Tarchonanthus glaberL.i.: 360 ( 1781 ); Thunb.: 638(1823).
T. dentatus Thunb.: 145 (1800); Willd.: 1793 (1804); Pers.: 405 (1807);
Thunb.: 638 (1823); Less.: 208 (1832). B. dentata (Thunb.) Harv.: 116
(1865); Sim: 246 (1907); Juel: 381 (1918); Sim: 44 (1921); Bews: 215
(1921); Henkel: 72 (1934); non DC. (1836). Type: Cape, Thunberg s.n.
(UPS, holo.-PRE (18915), photo.!).
B. grandifolia DC.: 430 (1836); Drege: 136(1843). Type: Zuurbergen,
Drege 2122 (G-DC, holo.!; K!).
Single-stemmed trees to multistemmed shrubs (2-)
5-20 m high; bark light grey to brown, not fissured; young
branches with rusty brown down, glabrescent. Leaves pet-
iolate, narrowly obovate to oblanceolate, sometimes nar-
rowly elliptic, (30— )90— 1 30(— 225) x (12-) 20-60(-90)
mm, coriaceous, glabrous adaxially, glabrous or rusty
brown-tomentose abaxially, margins entire or serrated in
upper half and on coppice shoots, base acute; petiole (8-)
10— 15(— 27) mm long. Heads many, in open axillary ra-
cemes or terminal panicles or racemes; peduncles of male
heads (2.5-)4.0-6.0 mm, and of female heads 1-3 mm
long. Involucral bracts in 4-7 series, 2.3-5.0(-7.0) x 0.6-
4.0(— 6.0) mm; individual bracts very narrowly to very
broadly ovate, rusty brown. Flowers 13-24 in male heads,
3— 10(— 22) in female heads. Pappus 3-6 mm long. Ovary
in male flowers 1.3-1. 9 mm long, oblong, rarely absent,
sometimes fertile. Staminodes in female flowers 0.8-2.0
mm long. Achene narrowly obovate to oblanceolate, 1 .3-
3.8 x 0.7-1. 4 mm, pubescent glandular. Flowering time:
March and April. Figure 6.
Distribution and habitat: B. glabra occurs mainly
along the eastern Cape coast (Figure 5), in open spaces
of high forest. At its northern limit in Natal (southeastern
parts) (Figure 5) it forms a small tree or a shrub, mainly
on south-facing sandstone outcrops and escarpment edges
near the coast.
Vouchers: Abbott 1192 (NH); Cilliers 63. 133 (PUC); Fourcade 537
(BOL.GRA, PRE), 4499(BOL); Ward 197 (NU); West267(BOL, GRA.
PEU).
3. Brachylaena ilicifolia (Lam.) Phill. & Schweick.
in Bothalia 3: 212 (1937); Hilliard: 108 (1977). Type:
Cape, Sonnerat s.n. (K, iso.!).
Baccharis ilicifolia Lam.: 345 (1783); Pers.: 423 (1807); Steud.: 177
(1841).
FIGURE 5. — Known geographic distribution of Brachylaena neriifolia.
•; and B. glabra. ▲.
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
179
FIGURE 6. — Brachylaena glabra (L.f.) Druce. A, branch with leaves
and female heads, Thode A860', B, male head, Cilliers 133\ C,
female head, Cilliers 63. Scale bars: 10 mm.
Tarchonanthus racemosus Thunb.: 145 (1800); Thunb.: 638 (1823);
Less.: 208 (1832). Brachylaena racemosa (Thunb.) DC.: 430 (1836);
Harv.: 1 16 (1865); Sim: 246 ( 1907); Wood: 170 ( 1908); Juel: 381 ( 1918);
Sim: 44 (1921); Bews: 215 (1921). Type: Cape. Thunberg s.n. (UPS.
holo.-PRE (microfiche 18919!).
B. elliptica auct., non (Thunb.) DC.: 430 (1836) quoad descr. et spec.
Multistemmed shrubs or small trees ( 1— )3 — 4(— 6) m
high; bark dark grey to brown, fissured; young branches
with white down, glabrescent. Leaves short-petiolate to
subsessile, oblong to narrowly oblong, sometimes nar-
rowly elliptic to elliptic or lanceolate to narrowly ovate,
( 10— )25— 45(— 75) x (4— )10— 15(— 30) mm, chartaceous, gla-
brous adaxially, white-tomentose and glandular abaxially,
apex acute or obtuse to rounded, usually mucronate, mar-
gin entire or dentate, base acute to obtuse, sometimes
rounded; petiole ( 0.5—) 1 .0— 3.0(— 5.0) mm long. Heads few,
in dense axillary racemes, sometimes solitary; peduncles
of male heads 0.5-1. 0(-2.0) mm and of female heads 0.8-
1 ,5(— 2.0) mm long. Involucral bracts in 5-8 series, 2.5-
5.0C-9.0) x 1 .5— 3.0( — 4.0) mm; individual bracts narrowly
to very widely ovate, sometimes narrowly to widely el-
liptic, glabrous to white tomentulose. Flowers 9-1 1 (-18)
in male and 8-12 in female heads. Pappus 2-5 mm long.
Ovary in male flowers, if present, up to 0.6 mm long.
Staminodes in female flowers, if present, up to 0.2 mm
long. Achene oblanceolate or narrowly elliptic, 2. 1-3.6 x
0.5-1. 3 mm, pubescent glandular. Flowering time'. August
and September. Figure 7.
Distribution and habitat'. B. ilicifolia occurs in scrub
in the drier parts of northeastern Transvaal, northern and
central Natal, and in the eastern Cape (Figure 8). It grows
in dry river valleys and on dry hillslopes.
Vouchers: Bayliss 5052 (GRA); Cilliers 53, 147 (PUC); Dahlstrand
1995( GRA, PRE); Feely 62 (NH. PRE, UN); Van Wyk5246tPRE. PRU).
4. Brachylaena huillensis O. Hoffm. in Botanische
Jahrbiicher 32: 149 (1902); Phill. & Schweick.: 212
(1937); Wild; 124 (1969); Paiva: 369 (1972); Hilliard: 107
(1977). Type: Angola, Huilla, Antunes 121 (K, iso.!).
FIGURE 7. — Brachylaena ilicifolia (Lam.) Phill. & Schweick. A.
branch with leaves and male heads, Bayliss 5052', B. male
head. Bayliss 5052\ C, female head. Cilliers 53. Scale bars: 10
mm.
180
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
FIGURE 8. — Known geographic distribution of Brachvlaena ilicifolia ;
•; and B. huillensis, ▲, within southern Africa.
Tarchonanthus camphoratus auct. non L.: Hiem: 554 ( 1898); Gossw. &
Mendon^a: 121-123 ( 1939), Welwitsch 6745 (could not be found).
B. hutchinsii Hutch.: 126 (1910); Brenan & Greenway: 149 (1949);
Eggeling: 95 (1951); Dale & Greenway: 155 (1961); Cufod.: 1091
(1966). Type: Nairobi, Hutchins s.n. (K, holo. !); Kenya, Nairobi,
Battiscombe 27 & 54 (K, para.!).
Single-stemmed medium to large trees (5-)6-10(-15)
m high; bark light grey to brown, deeply fissured; young
branches with white down. Leaves petiolate, narrowly ob-
ovate to oblanceolate, sometimes narrowly elliptic to ellip-
tic, (26— )45— 75(— 1 25) x (8—) 1 6— 30(— 50) mm, coriaceous,
glabrous adaxially, glandular and white-tomentose abaxi-
ally, apex acute, usually mucronate, margin entire, some-
times sinuate in front part or irregularly dentate, base
acute, sometimes decurrent; petiole (3— )5— 8 (-12) mm
long. Heads few, in dense axillary racemes; peduncles of
male heads 0.5— 1 .0(— 2.0 ) mm and of female heads 0.5- 1.0
mm long. Involucral bracts in 3-5 series, 2-4(-6) x 1.5-
3.0(— 5.0) mm, individual bracts ovate to very widely
ovate, sometimes narrowly to widely elliptic, white-to-
mentose. Flowers 6-9(-10) in male and 5 in female heads.
Pappus ( 1 .5— )3.0— 4.0(— 6.0) mm long. Ovary in male
flowers, if present, up to 0.3 mm long. Staminodes in fe-
male flowers, if present, up to 0.4 mm long. Achene ob-
lanceolate or narrowly elliptic, 3.5— 3.7(— 4.0) x 1.0-1. 3
mm, pubescent glandular. Flowering time ; July. Figure 9.
Distribution and habitat : within southern Africa B.
huillensis occurs in the northern parts of Transvaal, in
Zululand and Natal (Figure 8). It is confined to short for-
est, woodland and bush, usually on sandy soils.
Vouchers: Cilliers 79, 100, 104 (PUC); Lang s.nl (BOL, NBG); Moll &
Strey 3755 (NH); Pooley 883 (UN); Ward 7119 (NH).
5. Brachylaena elliptica (Thunb.) DC. in Pro-
dromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 5; 430
(1836), quoad basionym excl. spec, et descr.; Harv.: 116
(1865); Sim: 92 (1907); Wood: 169 (1908); Juel: 381
(1918); Sim: 44 (1921); Bews: 215 (1921); Henkel: 72
(1934); Phill. & Schweick.: 216 (1937). Type: Cape,
Thunberg s.n. (UPS, holo.-PRE (microfiche 18916!).
Tarchonanthus ellipticus Thunb.: 145 (1800); Willd.: 1793 (1804);
Pers.: 405 (1807); Thunb.: 638 (1823); Spreng.: 456 (1826) excl. syn.;
Less.: 208(1832).
B. dentate DC.: 430 (1836), non (Thunb.) Harv.; Type: Zuurbergen,
Dr'ege 3659 (G-DC, lecto.!, here designated); Albany, Burchell 3400
(G-DC!); Kafffaria, Ecklon 791. 793 (G-DC!).
Multistemmed shrubs or small trees (2— )4— 6(— 8) m
high; bark dark grey to brown, fissured; young branches
with white down, glabrescent. Leaves petiolate, widely to
narrowly obovate or narrowly oblanceolate, sometimes
narrowly elliptic to oblong, (21— )40— 70(— 76) x (6—) 1 5—30
(-62) mm, chartaceous, glabrous adaxially, glandular and
white-tomentose abaxially, apex acute or obtuse, some-
times mucronate, usually 3-lobed, margins entire or den-
tate, base acute, rarely obtuse; petiole (l-)3^f(-6) mm
long. Heads many, in open axillary or terminal racemes
FIGURE 9. — Brachylaena huillensis O. Hoffm. A, branch with leaves
and male heads, Cilliers 104\ B, male head, Cilliers 104 ; C, fe-
male head. Ward 7119. Scale bars: 10 mm.
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
181
FIGURE 10. — Brachylaena elliptica (Thunb.) DC. A, branch with
leaves and male heads, Bayliss 8747', B, male head, Bayliss
8747', C, female head, Cilliers 38. Scale bars: 10 mm.
or panicles; peduncles of male heads 0.5-1. 0 mm and of
female heads 0.5-1. 5 mm long. Involucral bracts in 3-6
series, 1 .5— 3.0(— 5 .0) x 0.5— 1 .5 (— 2.0 ) mm; individual
bracts narrowly to very widely ovate, sometimes lanceo-
late, white tomentulose. Flowers (4 — )7— 1 1(— 15) in male
and 4-10 in female heads. Pappus 1.5-2.5(-4.0) mm long.
Ovaries in male flowers, if present, up to 0.4 mm long.
Staminodes in female flowers, if present, up to 0.8 mm
long. Achene narrowly obovate to narrowly oblanceolate,
2. 1-3.2 x 0.5-1. 0 mm, pubescent glandular. Flowering
time : April, May and June. Figure 10.
The leaves of B. elliptica are very variable in their
shape and often conspicuously 3-lobed or 3-toothed at the
apex; they sometimes resemble those of B. glabra, but
are shorter, not as wide and white-tomentose (never gla-
brous) abaxially.
Distribution and habitat : B. elliptica is widespread in
the eastern Cape from Uitenhage eastwards through Trans-
kei to Natal and Zululand (Figure 11). It can be found in
coastal and river bush, valley bushveld, in scrub or on
grassy slopes, often on rocky ridges.
Vouchers: Cilliers 27, 38, 50 (PUC); MacOwan 244 (NH); Olivier 2141
(PEU); Osborne 232 (GRA); Strey 6699 (NH, PRE).
6. Brachylaena rotundata S. Moore in Journal of
Botany: 131 (1903); Burtt Davy & Pott-Leend.: 168
(1912); Eyles: 508 (1916); Sim: 44 (1921); Phill. &
Schweick.: 218 (1937); Wild: 123 (1969); Paiva: 372-375
(1972). Type: Transvaal, north escarpment of Witwaters-
rand series, Rand 738 (BM, holo. ! ).
B. rhodesiana S. Moore 37: 448 (1906); S. Moore: 108 (1911 ); Eyles:
508 (1916). Type: Rhodesia, Matopo hills, Gibbs 72 (BM, holo.!; K,
iso.!).
B. discolor auct. non DC.: Munro: 90 ( 1908); Eyles: 508 (1916).
Single-stemmed large shrubs or medium-large trees
(3— )5— 8(— 1 5 ) m high; bark dark brown to black, deeply
fissured; young branches white-tomentose, glabrescent.
Leaves petiolate, narrowly to widely elliptic, sometimes
narrowly obovate or oblong, (25— )50— 100(— 1 60) x (15-)
30-50(-90) mm, coriaceous, glabrous to white-tomentose
adaxially, white-tomentose abaxially, glandular, apex
acute to obtuse, sometimes rounded, margins entire or cre-
nate smoothly rounded, sometimes dentate in coppice
shoots, base obtuse to rounded; petiole ( 1— )3— 7(— 10) mm
long. Heads many, in open axillary or terminal racemes
or panicles, peduncles of male heads 1 .0—1 .5(— 2.0) mm
and of female heads 0.5-3 .0 mm long. Involucral bracts
in 4-10 series, 3— 6(— 8) x 2— 3(— 5) mm; individual bracts
ovate to very widely ovate, sometimes lanceolate, white-
tomentulose. Flowers 1 3— 28(— 3 1 ) in male and 11-27 in
female heads. Pappus 3.0-6.5 mm long. Ovaries absent
in male flowers. Staminodes absent in female flowers.
Achene narrowly elliptic, 1.6-3. 8 x 0.5- 1.0 mm, pubes-
cent glandular. Flowering time : August and September.
Figure 12.
Distribution and habitat : within southern Africa B.
rotundata occurs in the northeastern, southern and western
parts of Transvaal and occasionally on the Free State side
of the Vaal River (Figure 11). It is common on rocky
ridges and hills and the edges of dry kloof bush.
Vouchers: Adlam & Wood 5633 (NH); Botha & Ubbink 1556 (PUC,
PRE); Cilliers 149, 151 (PUC); Leendertz 235 (GRA, KMG. NH); The-
ron 1557 (PRE, PRU).
FIGURE 1 1 . — Known geographic distribution of Brachylaena elliptica,
•; and B. rotundata, ▲, within southern Africa.
182
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
FIGURE 12. — Brachylaena rotundata S. Moore. A, branch with leaves
and female heads, Cilliers 149: B, male head, Cilliers 151\ C,
female head, Cilliers 150. Scale bars: 10 mm.
7. Brachylaena discolor DC. Prodromus systematis
naturalis regni vegetabilis 5: 430 (1836); Drege: 155, 157
(1843); Harv.: 117 (1865); Wood & Evans: 23, 24 (1898);
Sim: 247 (1907); Wood: 169 (1908); Sim: 44 (1921);
Bews: 215 (1921); Henkel: 72 (1934); Phill. & Schweick.:
219 (1937); Macnae & Kalk: 154 (1958); Wild: 123
(1969); Hilliard & Burtt: 3 (1971); Paiva: 369 (1972);
Hilliard: 109 (1977). Type: Cape, Uitenhage District, Bur-
chell 3751 (G-DC, lecto.!, here designated); Uitenhage,
Ecklon 1422 (G-DC!); between the Umzimkulu and Um-
tentu Rivers, Drege 5043 (G-DC!); Mozambique, Delagoa
Bay, Forbes s.n. (G-DC!).
Multistemmed shrubs or small to large trees (2-)6-10
(-20) m high; bark light grey to brown, fissured; young
branches with white down, glabrescent. Leaves petiolate,
oblanceolate to narrowly obovate, sometimes elliptic to
narrowly elliptic; (50— )70— 100(— 1 90) x (15-) 25-45(-60)
mm, glabrous adaxially, white-tomentose abaxially, glan-
dular, apex acute, sometimes obtuse, rarely rounded, mar-
gin entire, sinuated or serrated over whole margin or in
upper half and in coppice shoots, base decurrent into a
petiole; petiole (3— )8— 10(— 12) mm long. Heads many, in
open axillary or terminal racemes or panicles, peduncles
of male heads 0.5-3.0(-5.0) mm and of female heads 0.4-
4.0 mm long. Involucral bracts in 4—10 series, ( 1 .5— )3.0—
1 0.0(— 1 5.0) x (0.5-)2.0-4.0 (-6.0) mm; individual bracts
narrowly to very widely ovate, sometimes elliptic to nar-
rowly elliptic, white-tomentulose to tomentose. Flowers
1-45 in male and 1-26 in female heads. Pappus 2.0-8. 5
mm long. Ovary in male flowers, if present, up to 0.5
FIGURE 13. — Brachylaena discolor DC. subsp. discolor. A, branch
with leaves and female heads, Harrison 29: B, male head,
Cilliers 135: C, female head, Cilliers 109. Scale bars: 10 mm.
mm long. Staminodes in female flowers, if present, up to
0.7 mm long. Achene narrowly obovate to linear, 1.0-3. 9
x 0.4—1. 0 mm, pubescent glandular. Flowering time : July,
August and September.
B. discolor can usually be distinguished from the other
species by the leaf base which is mostly decurrent into
the petiole.
Distribution and habitat: B. discolor, one of the most
widely distributed species in the genus, occurs in northern
and eastern Transvaal, through Swaziland and the eastern
FIGURE 14. — Known geographic distribution of Brachylaena discolor
subsp. discolor within southern Africa.
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
183
FIGURE 15. — Brachylaena discolor DC. subsp. transvaalensis (Phill.
& Schweick.) J. Paiva. A, branch with leaves and female
heads, Cilliers 134; B. male head, Cilliers 137; C, female head,
Cilliers 144. Scale bars: 10 mm.
parts of Natal and Transkei up to the mouth of the Bush-
mans River in the eastern Cape. Its habitat varies from
inland forests on valley slopes and plateaux to coastal for-
ests, scrub and dune bush.
Key to subspecies
In 10-15% of the specimens investigated, the values of
the characters used in this key overlapped.
la Involucral bracts of male heads in 7-10 (rarely 6) series;
peduncle of male heads up to 5 mm long; involucral bracts
of female heads in 6-10 series; peduncle of female heads
\-4 mm long; involucral bracts up to 12 mm long in male
heads and up to 15 mm long in female heads
7a. subsp. discolor
lb Involucral bracts of male heads in 4-6 series; peduncle of male
heads up to 1 mm long; involucral bracts of female heads
in 5-7 series; peduncle of female heads 0.4— 1.5 mm long;
involucral bracts up to 4 mm long in male heads and up to
6 mm long in female heads 7b. subsp. transvaalensis
7a. subsp. discolor
J. Paiva in Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana 46: 369
(1972).
B. natalensis Sch. Bip.: 972 (1843); Sch. Bip.: 671 (1844); Harv.: 117
(1865). Type: prope Natal-Bay [Durban], Krauss 243 (G, holo.!).
B. discolor subsp. discolor var. mossambicensis J. Paiva 46: 369 ( 1972).
Type: Nhacoongo, 90 km south of Inhambane, Gomes & Sousa 1667
(COI, holo.!).
B. rhodesiana auct. non S. Moore: S. Moore: 108 (1911) quoad specim.
Swynnerton 6515.
Multistemmed shrubs or small trees, usually not higher
than 6-8 m. Male heads with involucral bracts in 7-10
series, involucre 3—1 Of— 1 2) mm long; peduncles 1-5
mm long; 1 1-39 flowers per head. Female heads with
involucral bracts in 6-10 series, involucre 6.0— 13.5(— 1 5.0)
mm long; peduncles 1-4 mm long; 9-26 flowers per head.
Figure 13.
Distribution and habitat: B. discolor subsp. discolor is
a common coastal species (with an occasional inland oc-
currence, e.g. Hluhluwe Game Reserve) found from the
mouth of the Bushmans River in the eastern Cape to
Transkei, Natal and Zululand (Figure 14).
Vouchers: Cilliers 108. 109. 135 (PUC); Flanagan 861 (NBG);
Muirhead K17 (RUH); Schweickerdt 1384 (NH, STE); Strey 8751. 8753.
8783. 8793, 8795, 8798 (NH).
7b. subsp. transvaalensis (Phill. & Schweick.) J.
Paiva in Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana 46: 369 (1972).
B. transvaalensis Phill. & Schweick.: 214 (1937); Hilliard & Burtt: 3
(1971). Type: South Africa, Transvaal, Pietersburg. between Houtbos and
Haenertsburg, Hutchins s.n. (K, holo.!).
B. uniflora Harv.: 117 (1865); Bews: 215 (1921); Phill. & Schweick.:
211 (1937); Hilliard & Bum: 3 (1971); Hilliard: 109 (1977). Type: Natal,
on mountains, 30-60 miles from the sea, Sutherland s.n. (K, holo.!).
Single-stemmed medium-large to large trees, not
higher than 20 m. Male heads with involucral bracts in
4--6 series, involucre 1-4 mm long; peduncles 0.5-1. 2 mm
long; 1-14 flowers per head. Female heads with involu-
cral bracts in 5-7 series, involucre 3-6 mm long; pedun-
cles 0.4-1. 5 mm long; 1-11 flowers per head. Figure 15.
Distribution and habitat: within southern Africa B. dis-
color subsp. transvaalensis occurs in the northern and
eastern Transvaal and in Swaziland, as well as in the
northeastern and southern parts of Natal and the Transkei
(Figure 16). It can be found in inland and coastal forests,
but not in dune bush or forests directly facing the sea.
FIGURE 16. — Known geographic distribution of Brachylaena discolor
subsp. transvaalensis.
184
Bothalia 23,2 ( 1993)
Vouchers: Cilliers 120, 137, 144 (PUC); Compton 29073 (NBG); Keet
1130 (STE); Schrire, Van Wvk & Abbott 1782 (NH); Strey 8752, 8819,
8820 (NH).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The financial support by the Council for Scientific and
Industrial Research, Pretoria and the Potchefstroom Uni-
versity for Christian Higher Education is gratefully ac-
knowledged. Thanks are also due to Dr O.A. Leistner
(National Botanical Institute, Pretoria) and Dr G.F. Smith
(formerly Potchefstroom University for Christian Higher
Education) for their constructive comments on the text,
and the directors and staff of the cited herbaria for the
loan of specimens.
REFERENCES
BENTHAM, G. & HOOKER, J.D. 1873. Genera plantarum. Lovell
Reeve. London.
BEWS, J.W. 1921. An introduction to the flora of Natal and Zululand. City
Printing Works, Pietermaritzburg.
BOLUS, H. & WOLLEY-DOD. A.H. 1904. Flowering plants and ferns of
the Cape Peninsula. Transactions of the South African Philosoph-
ical Society 14: 277.
BRENAN, J.P.M. & GREENWAY, P.J. 1949. Checklists of the forest trees
and shrubs of the British Empire No. 5, Tanganyika Territory part
II. Imperial Forestry Institute, Oxford.
BROWN, R. 1817. Brachylaena. Transactions of the Linnean Society of
London 12: 115.
BURTT DAVY, J. & POTT-LEENDERTZ, R. 1912. Brachylaena. Annals
of the Transvaal Museum 3: 168.
CASSINI, A.G. 1817. Oligocarpha neriifolia. Dictionnaire des Sciences
Naturelles 36: 22.
CILLIERS, S.S. 1990. Taksonomiese ondersoek van die Suider-Afrikaanse
verteenwoordigers van die genus Brachylaena R. Br. (Asteraceae).
M.Sc. thesis. Potchefstroom University for CHE.
CUFODONTIS, G. 1966. Brachylaena. Bulletin van de Rijksplantentuin,
Brussel 36: 1091.
DALE, I.R. & GREENWAY, P.J. 1961. Kenya trees and shrubs. Hatchards,
Nairobi.
DE CANDOLLE, A.P. 1836. Prodromus systematis naturalis regni veg-
etabilis 5. Treutell & Wiirtz, Paris.
DREGE, J.F. 1843. Zwei pflanzengeographische Documente. Leipzig.
DRUCE, G.C. 1917. Nomenclatorial notes: chiefly African and Australian.
Report of the Botanical Society and Exchange Club of the British
Isles: 611.
EGGELING, W.J. 1951 . The indigenous trees of the Uganda Protectorate.
Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.
ENGLER, A. & PRANTL, K. 1890. Die natiirlichen Pflanzenfamilien.
Engelmann, Leipzig.
EYLES, F. 1916. 8936 Brachylaena. Transactions of the Royal Society of
South Africa 5: 508.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., WELMAN, W.G., RETIEF, E„ IMMELMAN,
K.L., GERMISHUIZEN, G„ PIENAAR, B.J., VAN WYK, M. &
NICHOLAS, A. 1987. List of species of southern African plants,
edn 2, part 2. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No.
56: 216.
GOSSWEILER, J. & MENDON^A, F.A. 1939. Carta Fitogeografica de
Angola. Do Governo Geral De Angola.
HARVEY, W.H. 1865. Brachylaena. In W.H. Harvey & O.W. Sonder,
Flora capensis , Reprint 1 894, 3: 115-117. Reeve, London.
HENKEL, J.S. 1934. The woody plants of Natal and Zululand. Natal
University Development Fund Committee, Durban.
HJERN, W.P. 1898. Catalogue of the African plants collected by Dr.
Friedrich Welwitsch in 1853-61. Longmans, London.
HILLIARD, O.M. 1977. Compositae in Natal. University of Natal Press,
Pietermaritzburg.
HILLIARD, O.M. & BURTT, B.L. 1971. Notes on some plants of southern
Africa 2. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 31: 3-6.
HOFFMANN, O. 1902. Brachylaena huillensis. Botanische Jahrbiicher
32: 149.
HUTCHINSON, J. 1910. Diagnoses Africanae: Brachylaena hutchinsii.
Kew Bulletin: 126, 127.
JUEL, H.O. 1918. Plantae Thunbergianae. Akademiska, Uppsala.
LAMARCK, M.C. 1783. Dictionnaire Encyclopedique de Botanique.
Hotel De Thou, Paris.
LESSING, C.F. 1832. Synopsis generum compositarum. Dunckeri &
Humblotii, Berlin.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum 1. Impensis Laurentii Salvii.
Holmiae.
LINNAEUS, C. fil. 1781. Supplementum plantarum. Orphanotrophei,
Brunsvigae.
MACNAE, M. & KALK, M. 1958. A natural history of the Inhaca Island,
Mozambique. Witwatersrand University Press, Johannesburg.
MUNRO, C.F.H. 1908. Some indigenous trees of southern Rhodesia.
Proceedings of the Rhodesia Scientific Association 8,2: 90.
MOORE, S.L.M. 1903. Alabastra Diversa part X. Journal of Botany: 132.
MOORE, S.L.M. 1906. Brachylaena rhodesiana. Journal of the Linnean
Society of Botany 32: 448.
MOORE, S.L.M. 1911. Brachylaena rhodesiana. Journal of the Linnean
Society of Botany 40: 108.
PAIVA, J.A.R. 1972. Some notes in Brachylaena R. Br. Boletim da Socie-
dade Broteriana 46: 368-384.
PERSOON, C.H. 1807. Synopsis plantarum seu Enchiridium botanicum.
Treutel & Wiirtz, Paris.
PHILLIPS, E.P. & SCHWEICKERDT, H.G. 1937. A revision of the South
African species of Brachylaena R. Br. Bothalia 3: 205-221.
RADFORD, A.E., DICKISON, W.C., MASSEY, J.R. & BELL, C.R. 1974.
Vascular plant systematics. Harper & Row, New York.
SCHULTZ-BIPONTINUS, C.H. 1843. Brachylaena. In G.G. Walpers.
Repertorium 2, Supplementum 1 . Hofmeister, Lipsiae.
SCHULTZ-BIPONTINUS, C.H. 1844. Enumeratio compositarum. Flora
27:671.
SIM, T.R. 1907. The forests and forest flora of the Colony of the Cape of
Good Hope. Taylor & Henderson, Aberdeen.
SIM, T.R. 1921. Native timbers of South Africa. The Government Printing
and Stationery Office, Pretoria.
SPRENGEL, C. 1826. Sy sterna vegetabilium. Sumtibus Librariae Die-
terichianae, Gottingae.
STEUDEL, E.T. 1841. Nomenclator botanicus. Cottae, Stuttgart.
THUNBERG, C.P. 1800. Prodromus plantarum capensium. Edman, Up-
psala.
THUNBERG, C.P. 1823. Flora capensis. Cottae, Stuttgart.
WILLDENOW, C.L. 1804. Species plantarum. Nauk, Berlin.
WILD, H. 1969. Brachylaena R. Br. Kirkia 7: 123.
WOOD, J.M. 1908. Revised list of the Flora of Natal. Transactions of the
South African Philosophical Society : 169.
WOOD, J.M. & EVANS, M.S. 1898. Natal plants. Bennett & Davis,
Durban.
Bothalia 23,2: 185—190(1993)
Nomenclatural changes and additions to the genus Ophioglossum in Africa
(Ophioglossaceae: Pteridophyta)
J.E. BURROWS* and T.J. EDWARDS**
Keywords: Africa, new combination, new species, Ophioglossum, Pteridophyta, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
Recent research has necessitated a review of the nomenclature of the genus Ophioglossum in Africa, This paper establishes
a new species, O. caroticaule J. E, Burrows, a new subspecies, O. vulgatum L. subsp. africanum Pocock ex J. E. Burrows, and
a change in status, O. latifolium (Prantl) J.E. Burrows (basionym: O. gomezianum var. latifolium Prantl). Lectotypification is
provided for O. gracillimum Welw. ex Hook. & Bak., O. lusoafricanum Welw. ex Prantl, O. latifolium (Prantl) J.E. Burrows, and
O. rubellum Welw. ex A. Braun. Nomenclatural problems in O. lancifolium Presl are discussed.
UITTREKSEL
Onlangse navorsing het ’n hersiening van die nomenklatuur van die genus Ophioglossum in Afrika noodsaaklik gemaak. 'n
Nuwe spesie, O. caroticaule J.E. Burrows, ’n nuwe subspesie, O. vulgatum , L. subsp. africanum Pocock ex J.E. Burrows, en 'n
verandering in status, O. latifolium (Prantl) J.E. Burrows (basioniem: O. gomezianum var. latifolium Prantl), word in hierdie
artikel beskryf. Lektotipifikasie word verskaf vir O. gracillimum Welw. ex Hook. & Bak., O. lusoafricanum Welw. ex Prantl, O.
latifolium (Prantl) J.E. Burrows, en O. rubellum Welw. ex A. Braun. Nomenklatoriese probleme in O. lancifolium word
bespreek.
INTRODUCTION
The genus Ophioglossum L. has received no taxonomic
attention in Africa since Clausen’s (1938) confusing
monograph of the genus. The simple morphological struc-
ture of the plants together with apparently considerable
intraspecific variation has caused compilers of African re-
gional floras to either follow Clausen’s nomenclature or
assume a conservative stance by maintaining broadly cir-
cumscribed species which, in the light of recent studies,
are often composed of two or more clearly distinct taxa.
The most important development since Clausen’s work
is the publication by Wagner & Wagner (1983) of their
'genus communities’ concept, based upon work on the
genus Botrychium Swartz (Ophioglossaceae) in North
America. This concept made use of the fact that Botrych-
ium (like Ophioglossum) frequently grows together in
multiple species communities and, when this occurs, one
is able to make rational comparisons between taxa occur-
ring within a community, particularly if these differences
are maintained in communities found elsewhere under dif-
ferent edaphic and climatic conditions. This concept has
provided taxonomists with a valuable additional tool with
which to distinguish between environmentally-induced
variation and differences that are genetically controlled.
During recent studies, the senior author has discovered
an unique area in northwestern Zimbabwe which supports
1 1 species of Ophioglossum. Additional genus communi-
* RO. Box 710, Lydenburg, 1120.
** UN/FRD Research Unit for Plant Growth and Development, Depart-
ment of Botany, University of Natal, P.O. Box 375, Pietermaritzburg,
3200.
MS. received: 1992-04-24.
ties have since been located in both Zimbabwe and South
Africa which have made a better delimitation and defini-
tion of the southern African species of Ophioglossum pos-
sible. However, these studies have resulted in the need to
revise the nomenclature of several of the taxa occurring
on the African subcontinent.
DISCUSSION
In 1983, the senior author collected nine species of
Ophioglossum growing within an area of about six square
kilometres in the Sengwa Wildlife Research Area of north-
western Zimbabwe. Subsequent collecting at Sengwa has
yielded a further two species, bringing the total to eleven,
a situation not recorded to date elsewhere in the world for
the genus Ophioglossum. Additional genus communities
have been discovered by the senior author on Ngoma-
kurira, northeastern Zimbabwe (6 species), Elim Hospital,
eastern Zimbabwe (4 species), Treur River, eastern Trans-
vaal (5 species) and several communities composed of
two or three species each. These localities occur on var-
ious substrates (sandstone, granite, quartzite and dolomite)
and under varying climatic conditions, and the consistent
differences displayed between members of these genus
communities have allowed for clearer definitions to be
established between taxa.
However, the specific concepts within the African
members of Ophioglossum entrenched by Tardieu-Blot
(1953, 1964) and Schelpe (1970, 1977) do not adequately
cover the number of taxa that are evident from genus com-
munity studies. This was noted by Dr Mary Pocock of
Grahamstown who spent much time studying the South
African species of Ophioglossum. She recorded her con-
cepts in a manuscript which unfortunately was never pub-
186
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
lished. The author’s studies corroborate some of Pocock’s
species concepts and one of her taxa is published below.
Spore morphology is a valuable taxonomic tool within
the southern African species of Ophioglossum even
though it cannot be readily employed for rapid determi-
nations in herbaria.
1. The Ophioglossum lancifolium aggregate
Key to species
la Trophophore linear with a length:width ratio >10:1; tropho-
phore frequently falcate O. gracillimum
lb Trophophore narrowly lanceolate to narrowly elliptic with a
length:width ratio <10: 1 ; trophophore not falcate:
2a Old rhizomes strongly linear, with a length:width ratio >6: 1 ;
spore wall lurnina distinct, muri clearly reticulate ....
O. lusoafricanum
2b Old rhizomes short or ellipsoid, with a length:width ratio
<6: 1 ; spore wall lurnina reduced to conical pits:
3a Trophophore linear-elliptic, length: width ratio >6:1; rhi-
zome ellipsoid O. caroticaule
3b Trophophore elliptic, length:width ratio <6:1; rhizome
linear sp. aff. O. lancifolium
1.1. Ophioglossum caroticaule J.E. Burrows , sp.
nov., ab O. gracillimo sports aletis et trophophoris majori-
bus et latioribus differt; etiam O. lusoafricano similis sed
rhizomate brevi et latiore, trophophoro apiculato et sports
lurnina parva et conica ostendentibus differt.
TYPUS. — Zimbabwe: Gokwe Dist., Sengwa Wildlife
Research Area, Leguaan Vlei, 880 m, 11-2-1991, J.E. &
S.M. Burrows 5153 (K, holo.; PRE, SRGH, iso.). Figures
1; 2A, B.
Rhizome 4—14 x 2.0-3. 5 mm (ratio 2.6:1), ellipsoid,
with wiry, semi-descending roots which are rarely pro-
liferous. Stipe 18-40 mm long, ± 0.5 of its length subter-
ranean, dead stipes sometimes slightly persistent.
Trophophore usually solitary, erect, 14—39 x 2. 5-5.0 mm
(ratio 7.2:1), very narrowly elliptic, sterile trophophore
flat, fertile trophophore shallowly folded, apex sharply
apiculate, venation linear, epidermal cell walls sinuous,
stomata anomocytic. Sporophore 40-60 mm long, bearing
(6—) 1 2— 1 5(— 1 9) pairs of sporangia. Spores alete, 43—49
pm in equatorial diameter, muri thick, ± 3 pm wide, con-
tinuous and somewhat undulate, lurnina conical, 1. 5-2.3
pm wide, proximal surface concave, pitted (Figure 2A,
B).
This taxon was included under O. lancifolium s.l.
which comprises three or more species in Africa. It closely
resembles O. lusoafricanum but is clearly differentiated
from it by the spores with their conical lurnina, and the
short, ellipsoid rhizome. The apex of the trophophore is
generally sharply apiculate compared to the acute apex of
O. lusoafricanum. O. gracillimum is separated from O.
caroticaule by its trilete and smaller spores, 27-38 pm in
equatorial diameter (Figure 2D, E), and its much narrower
and slightly falcate trophophore.
Ophioglossum caroticaule appears, from the few
known collections, to be a species of shallow, sandy or
humic loams which are seasonally moist or wet, growing
among sparse, short grasses in subtropical deciduous
woodland or on open sheetrock on seasonally wet vege-
tation islands. It is a gregarious species and, in all popu-
lations so far seen in the field, grows with either O.
lusoafricanum, O. gomezianum Welw. ex A. Br., O. rubel-
lum Welw. ex A. Br. or O. costatum R. Br.
Specimens examined
(Focalities identified in terms of grid reference system —
see Edwards & Eeistner 1971.)
ETHIOPIA. — 0539: Sidamo, Bitata, 20 km from Negele on road to
Menghist, 1 450 m, 24-5-1983, Gilbert, Ensermu & Vollesen 7762 (K).
KENYA. — 0237: K4 Machakos, Nairobi-Mombasa Road, 7.4 km to-
wards Nairobi from Hunter’s Lodge, 960 m, 6-1-1972, Faden & Faden
72/18 (K, MO).
ZAMBIA. — 0831: Abercom Dist., old road to Cascalawa, 16-2-1960,
Richards 12480 (K).
ZIMBABWE. — 1828 (Gokwe): Gokwe Dist., Sengwa Wildlife Re-
search Area, Leguaan Vlei, 13-2-1983, Burrows 3016 (J.E.B. Herb.);
11-2-1991, Burrows & Burrows 5153 (K, holo., PRE, SRGH). 2027
(Plumtree): Matopo Hills, Bulalima-Mangwe, Embakwe, (-DD), 10-5-
1942, Feiertag s.n. (BM, SRGH). 2028 (Bulawayo): Matopo Hills,
Bulalima-Mangwe, Greystone, (-CA), 1-5-1939, Feiertag s.n. (BM,
SRGH).
SOUTH AFRICA
TRANSVAAL. — 2429 (Zebediela): Potgietersrus, Percy Fyfe Nature
Reserve, (-AA), 1 500 m, 22-2-1971, Huntley 2013 (PRE). 2430
(Pilgrim’s Rest): Bourke’s Luck. Goedgeloof Plantations, Treur River,
(-DB), 1 200 m, 27-12-1990, Burrows 5113 (J.E.B. Herb.).
1 .2. Ophioglossum gracillimum Welw. ex Hook. &
Bak., Synopsis filicum: 445 (1868); Burrows: 40 (1990);
Johns: 8 (1991). Type: Angola, Pungo Andongo, near
Catete, Jan. 1857, Welwitsch 36 (BM, lecto.!; K!, FISU,
iso.).
FIGURE 1 . — Ophioglossum caroticaule, Burrows 3016, Sengwa Re-
search Area, Zimbabwe.
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
187
FIGURE 2. — Spores of Ophioglossum. O. caroticaule, J.E. & S.M. Burrows 5153: A. proximal, B. distal. O. lusoafricanum : C. J.E. & S.M. Burrows
5147 , distal; F, Burrows 4949, distal. O. gracillimum, J.E. & S.M. Burrows 5138: D. proximal, E, distal. O. sp. aff. lancifolium, J.E. & S.M.
Burrows 5158: G, proximal, FI, distal. O. vulgatum subsp. africanum, J.E. & S.M. Burrows 5122: J. proximal, K. distal. O. convexum, J.E.
& S.M. Burrows 5213: 1, L. distal. Scale bars: 20 pm.
O. lusitanicum L. var. gracillimum Welw. ex A. Br.: 177 (1868).
O. gramineum Willd., sensu Schelpe: 34 (1977).
Although the collection Welwitsch 36 is repeatedly
quoted as the type material of this species, no single ele-
ment has been selected from what are, by Welwitsch's
own admission (on the BM sheet), several different collec-
tions, albeit from the same area or locality. After his initial
gathering in January 1857, to which he allocated the num-
ber 36, Welwitsch apparently re-collected this species on
three occasions. Subsequent collections made in February
were then numbered 36a, 36b and 36c and the BM sheet
bears plants from all four gatherings. Since the January
collection (No. 36) is the first collection, and is typical of
the species, the group of seven central plants immediately
above the brown label on the sheet housed in BM, is
hereby selected as the lectotypic element for the name of
the species, with isotypic specimens in K and LISU.
The practice of placing Welwitsch's species under the
superficially similar Australo- Asian species O. gramineum
(Prantl 1883; Carruthers 1901; Clausen 1938; Tardieu-B lot
1953, 1964; Schelpe 1977) is, in my opinion, unfounded
and O. gracillimum is hereby maintained as a clearly de-
fined species confined to Africa.
188
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
Distribution : Ghana, Tanzania, Angola, Zimbabwe,
South Africa (Transvaal).
1.3. Ophioglossum lusoafricanum Welw. ex Prantl
in Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 1:
351 (1883); Pichi Sermolli: 641 (1954); Faden: 25 (1974).
Type: Angola, Pungo Andongo, Welwitsch 34 (B, holo.
[destroyed]; BM!, neo.; K!, LISU, iso.).
Soon after the publication of Welwitsch’s epithet, the
taxon was sunk into O. gramineum Willd. by Clausen
(1938) who then, in July 1939, annotated Welwitsch’s
sheet of O. lusoafricanum in Kew as O. lancifolium Presl.
In southern Africa, Schelpe (1970) and Schelpe & An-
thony ( 1 986) have retained the epithet O. lancifolium for
all species of Ophioglossum with a narrowly elliptic to
lanceolate trophophore which is held clear of the ground
on a distinct stipe. Recent studies have shown that there
are three distinct taxa that display these general characters
within south-central Africa. O. caroticaule (described
above) appears to be rare. The most common species is
a taxon with a rather variable trophophore shape and size
but with two characters which clearly differentiate it from
what is believed to be typical O. lancifolium: spore sculp-
turing (Figure 1A & B) and rhizome shape. This common
taxon matches perfectly Welwitsch’s O. lusoafricanum , a
fact also recognized by Pichi Sermolli (1954) and Faden
(1974). What is thought to be true O. lancifolium is re-
corded from central Africa but is not recorded from south
of the 20°S line of latitude, being apparently confined to
the Zambezian phytogeographical region (White 1983).
In his type description, Prantl (1884) quotes a specimen
in Berlin as the type collection. Since all Berlin’s Ophio-
glossum material was destroyed during World War 2, a
neotype must be selected.
All the sheets seen of Welwitsch 34 in K and BM com-
prise more than one gathering. Although probably all of
the same species, in a genus with species so poorly dif-
ferentiated as Ophioglossum , it is essential that a single
gathering is selected as the type to avoid taxonomic am-
biguity. Therefore the top collection on the sheet in BM,
composed of nine plants collected in January 1857, is
hereby selected as the neotype of O. lusoafricanum.
O. lusoafricanum displays a confusing trait whereby
the first emerging trophophore from a root sucker is fre-
quently ovate to orbicular and appressed to the ground,
thereby resembling O. convexum J. E. Burrows. These
small, ovate forms may sometimes produce fertile spikes,
giving the impression that there are two topopatric species.
However the spore pattern of the two species is quite dif-
ferent (Figure 2C, F, I, L) with O. convexum being con-
sistently trilete and O. lusoafricanum being alete or trilete,
or rarely monolete. The spore sculpturing of O. convexum
is variable which may indicate hybrid activity in some
forms.
1.4. Ophioglossum lancifolium Presl , Supplemen-
tum tentaminis pteridographiae (1845). Type: Mauritius,
Du Petit-Thouars s.n. (PR, holo., P!, iso.?).
O. lancifolium is a name that has been widely applied
to any species of Ophioglossum in tropical Africa that
bears a narrow trophophore well clear of the ground
(Schelpe 1970; Tardieu-Blot 1953; Jacobsen 1983). Al-
though plants which roughly correspond to Thouars’
plants have been collected in central Africa, the status of
O. lancifolium cannot be verified on the African mainland
until good topotypic material is located from Mauritius.
The extant specimens in Paris collected by Du Petit-
Thouars from Mauritius are extremely poor and inade-
quate for a sound comparison. Specimens from mainland
Africa share the same trophophore shape, the same rhi-
zome form and (possibly) the same spore ornamentation
(Figure 2G, H). However it is vital that live plants are
seen and collected from Mauritius before the African
taxon can be equated with the type of O. lancifolium.
Unfortunately Lorence, in his survey of the pteridophytes
of Mauritius (1978), records against O. lancifolium : ‘not
seen recently’.
The distribution of the African taxon currently attrib-
utable to O. lancifolium: Angola, Namibia, Botswana,
Zambia, Zimbabwe.
2. Ophioglossum latifolium (Prantl) J.E. Burrows,
stat. nov.
O. gomezianum Welw. ex A. Br. var. latifolium Prantl in Jahrbuch des
Koniglichen Botanischen Gartens und des Botanischen Museums zu
Berlin 3: 307-333 (1884). Type: Angola, Pungo Andongo, near Catete,
Feb. 1857, Welwitsch 32 (K, lecto.!, the right-hand specimen here desig-
nated; BM!, LISU, iso.).
O. latifolium most closely resembles O. rubellum
Welw. ex A. Br. (with which it is most frequently con-
fused) but differs in its much larger size, its more slender
rhizome with wider-spreading proliferous roots, the lack
of orange pigmentation in the pedicel and trophophore,
and its completely different spore ornamentation.
Up to now we have thought that this taxon could be
a hybrid since three spore samples examined have all had
malformed or undeveloped spores. This fact is also noted
by Prantl in his original description where he states
‘sporae degenerae’. However, apparently normal spores
have been found in some collections which, together with
this species’ wide distribution, suggests that it is probably
a stabilised hybrid with a very low percentage of viable
spores produced. This is borne out by the populations seen
being extremely localised and of obvious clonal origin.
Nonetheless, there is no reason not to consider it a good
species.
There seems to be no valid reason to assume that O.
latifolium is allied to O. gomezianum since it shares very
few characters with the latter species. Most noticeably, it
lacks the suborbicular or ellipsoid rhizome that is typical
of O. gomezianum , whereas its consistently broader
trophophores which are held almost flat on the ground,
clearly separate it from O. gomezianum, and the taxon is
therefore elevated to species level.
Although no holotype was designated by Prantl in his
description, Schelpe (1977) illegitimately quotes the Kew
collection as the holotype. The Kew sheet comprises two
collections and the right-hand collection on the Kew sheet
is hereby selected as the lectotype of the name O. latifol-
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
189
ium. Ballard’s determination of that collection as O. cos-
tatum is incorrect.
Distribution : Sierra Leone, Nigeria, Kenya, Zaire, An-
gola, Zambia, Zimbabwe.
3. Ophioglossum vulgatum L. subsp. africanum Po-
cock ex J.E. Burrows, subsp. nov., ab O. vulgato subsp.
vulgato sporis glabrioribus reticulo murorum tenuiore
aequabiliore luminisque fovearum conicis ± 1 .0-1.5 |im
latis diminutis differt.
TYPUS.— 2929 (Underberg): South Africa, Natal,
Bergville Dist., Cathedral Peak Forest Research Station,
Catchment 9, (-AB), 1 905 m, 9-1-1951, Killick 1267
(NU, holo.; PRE, iso.).
The epithet vulgatum has been generally applied to
southern African species of Ophioglossum that are mor-
phologically very similar to the north temperate O. vul-
gatum L. During a recent study of the genus in Africa,
numerous SEM photographs have been made of spores of
the southern African taxon, which has revealed a striking
difference in spore morphology between the northern and
southern hemisphere taxa. The spore morphology of O.
vulgatum has been well documented in Europe (Paul
1987; Ferrarini et al. 1986) and Asia (Kurita 1981;
Nakamura & Shibasaki 1959; Pant & Misra 1975). All
these studies reveal spore ornamentation characterised by
a very irregular and coarse reticulum of muri rising up to
shallow points resulting in a distinctly jagged profile.
In contrast, all the spores of the southern African taxon
examined have a relatively uniform and fine reticulum
which, in profile, is smooth (Figure 2J, K), lacking the
jagged reticulum of the northern hemisphere taxon. Spore
size, however, does not differ greatly [southern Africa:
(27-)33^15(-60) jim; Europe/Asia: (28-)34-40(-47) pm]
although the southern African material tends to be slightly
larger.
Pocock, in her unpublished manuscript on southern Af-
rican Ophioglossum , describes the southern African ma-
terial of O. vulgatum as a subspecies of the typical
material, based, as she puts it, largely upon geographical
considerations’. This, in itself, is not sufficient grounds
for taxonomic distinction; however, the additional infor-
mation now available on spore morphology supports this
separation, and the southern African material (none of the
specimens examined for spore pattern have shown any
resemblance to the northern hemisphere subspecies) is
now regarded as a separate subspecies. Spores of O. vul-
gatum from East Africa have not yet been examined.
Selected specimens examined
Note: specimens of which spores have been examined
by SEM are marked with an asterisk *.
ZIMBABWE. — 1731 (Harare): Domboshawa, (-CA), 26-3-1983,
Burrows 3037 (SRGH, J.E.B. Herb.). 1828 (Gokwe): Gokwe Dist.,
Sengwa Wildlife Research Area. Froggy Pond, (-AA), 10-2-1991. Bur-
rows & Burrows 5144* (K. MICH. NU, PRE, SRGH. TI); Leguaan Vlei,
(-AA), 11-2-1991, Burrows & Burrows 5155* (J.E.B. Herb., TI). 1832
(Mutare): Nyanga National Park, (-BD), 16-1-1951, Chase 3758* (BM,
BOL, SRGH). 1932 (Melsetter): Chimanimani Mts, Bundi Plain, (-DD),
26-10-1959, Goodier & Phipps 280 (BM, PRE, SRGH).
TRANSVAAL. — 2230 (Messina): Funduzi, (-CD), 21-1-1931,
Bremekamp & Schweickerdt 321 (PRE). 2328 (Baltimore): Blouberg,
(-BB), 11-1-1955, Codd & Dyer 8979 (PRE). 2430 (Pilgrim’s Rest):
Graskop, The Pinnacle, (-DD), 2-1-1961, Braithwaite 203* ( BOL ). 2530
(Lydenburg): 0.25 km N of Sabie, (-BB), 30-12-1990, Burrows & Bur-
rows 5122* (K, MICH, PRE, TI); Kaapsehoop village, (-DB), 19-12-
1990, Burrows & Burrows 5093* (K, MICH, PRE, TI).
NATAL. — 2730 (Vryheid): Utrecht, (-AD), 3-11-1985, Devenish
1884 (PRE). 2929 (Underberg): Fort Nottingham Commonage, (-BD),
30-10-1987, Goldblatt & Manning 85 1 0 (MO, PRE). 2930 (Pietermaritz-
burg): New Hanover/Mapumulo, Kingcliffe, (-BD), 5-1-1965, Moll 1519
(PRE). 3029 (Kokstad): Alfred Dist., Weza, southern slopes of Ingeli
Mtn, (-DA), 2-1-1966, Strey 6395 (BR, K, NU, PRE).
4. Ophioglossum rubellum Welw. ex A. Br. in
Kuhn, Filices africanae: 179 (1868); Hook. & Bak.: 445
(1868); Prantl: 321 (1884); Clausen: 152 (1938); Tardieu-
Blot: 23 (1953); Faden: 25 (1974); Schelpe: 33 (1977);
Johns: 10 (1991). Type: Angola, Pungo Andongo, near
Catete, Welwitsch 33 (K, lecto.!; BM!, LISU, iso.).
As with most of Welwitsch’s collections of Ophio-
glossum, his No. 33, the type of O. rubellum , is composed
of a number of collections gathered at different localities
in the Pungo Andongo District during January and Feb-
ruary 1857. The sheet in BM and one of the two sheets
in K both consist of more than one gathering. Clausen, in
1946, annotated the one sheet in K as ‘Type’, although
he never published a lectotypification. There are, however,
two (apparently) different collections on the Kew sheet.
In order to avoid confusion, the group of four plants
mounted above Welwitsch’s printed label at the bottom of
the sheet at Kew (already annotated as the type by
Clausen) is hereby selected as the lectotypic element for
the name of the species.
Distribution : Guinea (?), Sierra Leone, Ghana, Nigeria,
Central African Republic, Ethiopia, Uganda, Kenya, Tan-
zania, Gabon, Angola, Zambia, Zimbabwe, South Africa
(Transvaal).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Sincere thanks are extended to the directors and cura-
tors of the following herbaria for allowing me to make
use of their collections: BM, K, NU, P, PRE, SRGH.
WIND; Mr Ian Coulson, Officer-in-Charge of Sengwa
Wildlife Research Institute and the staff of the Zim-
babwean Dept of National Parks for allowing me to study
and collect plants on their property; the staff of the E.M.
unit of the University of Natal for help with the SEM
photographs of spores; and Mr M. Lambert for the Latin
translations.
REFERENCES
BRAUN, A. 1868. Ophioglossaceae. In M. Kuhn, Filices africanae.
Lipsiae.
BURROWS, J.E. 1990. Southern African ferns and fern allies. Frandsen
Publishers, Sandton.
CARRUTHERS, W. 1901. Cryptogamia. In W.P. Hiem, Catalogue of the
African plants collected by Dr. Friedrich Welwitsch in 1853-61 . II
(U): 278, 279.
CLAUSEN, R.T. 1938. A monograph of the Ophioglossaceae. Memoirs of
the Torrey Botanical Club 19: 1-177.
EDWARDS, D. & LE1STNER. O.A. 197 1 . A degree reference system for
citing biological records in South Africa. Mitteilungen der
Botanischen Staatssammlung, Munchen 10: 501-509.
FADEN, R.B. 1974. Pteridophytes. In A.D.Q. Agnew, Upland Kenya
wildflowers. Oxford University Press.
190
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
FERRARINI, E„ CIAMPOLINI, F„ PICHI SERMOLLI, R.E.G. &
MARCHETTI, D. 1986. Iconographia Palynologica Pterido-
phytorum Italiae. Webbia 40: 1-202.
HOOKER, W.J. & BAKER. J.G. 1868. Synopsis filicum. Hardwicke,
London.
JACOBSEN, W.B.G. 1983. Ferns and fern allies of southern Africa.
Butterworth, Durban.
JOHNS, R.J. 1991. Pteridophytes of tropical East Africa: a preliminary
checklist of the species. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
KURITA, S. 1981. Studies on the spore coat ornamentation of Japanese
Ophioglossaceae by S.E.M. 1 . Journal of Japanese Botany 56:
279-286.
LORENCE, D.H. 1978. The pteridophytes of Mauritius (Indian Ocean):
ecology and distribution. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Soci-
ety 76: 207-247.
NAKAMURA, J. & SHIBASAKI, T. 1959. Diagnostic characters of fern
spores I. Ophioglossaceae, Helminthostachyaceae and Os-
mundaceae. Research reports of the Kochi University 8: 1-11.
PANT, D.D. & MISRA, D.R. 1975. Spore morphology of Ophioglossum
vulgatum L. Phytomorphology 25: 465-470.
PAUL, A.M. 1987. The status of Ophioglossum azoricum (Ophio-
glossaceae : Pteridophyta) in the British Isles. Fern Gazette 13:
173-187.
PICHI SERMOLLI, R.E.G. 1954. Adumbratio florae aethiopicae 3.
Ophioglossaceae, Osmundaceae, Schizaeaceae. Webbia 9: 623-
656.
PRANTL, K. 1883. Systematische Uebersicht der Ophioglosseen.
Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 1: 348-353.
PRANTL, K. 1884. Beitrage zur Systematik der Ophioglosseen.
Jahrbuch des Koniglichen Botanischen Gartens und des
Botanischen Museums zu Berlin 3: 307-333.
PRESL, K.B. 1845. Supplementum tentaminis pteridographiae. Acta So-
cietatis Regis Bohemicae Scientiarium Ser. V, 4: 48-53.
SCHELPE, E.A.C.L.E. 1970. Pteridophyta. In A.W. Exell & E. Launert,
Flora zambesiaca. Crown Agents, London.
SCHELPE, E.A.C.L.E. 1977. Pteridophyta. In A. Fernandes, E. Launert
& E.J. Mendes, Conspectus florae angolensis. Junta de Investi-
gagoes CientifTcas do Ultramar, Lisboa.
SCHELPE, E.A.C.L.E. & ANTHONY, N.C. 1986. Pteridophyta. In O.A.
Leistner, Flora of southern Africa. Botanical Research Institute,
Pretoria.
TARDIEU-BLOT, M.-L. 1953. Les Pteridophytes de l’Afrique Inter-
tropicale Franqaise. Memoires de Plnstitut Frangaise d'Afrique
Noire 28: 19-24.
TARDIEU-BLOT, M.-L. 1964. Pteridophytes. Dans A. Aubreville, Flore
du Cameroun 3. Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris.
WAGNER, W.H. & WAGNER, F.S. 1983. Genus communities as a
systematic tool in the study of New World Botrychium (Ophio-
glossaceae). Taxon 32: 51-63.
WHITE, F. 1983. The vegetation of Africa: a descriptive memoir to
accompany the UNESCO/AETFAT/UNO vegetation map of Afri-
ca. Natural Resources Research 20, UNESCO, Paris.
Bothalia 23,2: 191-196(1993)
Systematic studies in the genus Mohria (Anemiaceae: Pteridophyta). IV.
Comparative gametophyte morphology in Mohria and Anemia
J.P. ROUX*
Keywords: Anemia , Anemiaceae, gametophyte, Mohria , morphology, Pteridophyta
ABSTRACT
The sporophyte morphology in Mohria and Anemia (Anemiaceae) is dissimilar. However, similarities in their anatomy,
trichomes, spores and chromosome numbers show clearly that these genera are related. The contribution of the gametophyte to
the classification and phylogeny of the Pteridophyta is largely neglected. The gametophyte of Anemiaceae is primitive in many
features when compared with that of other leptosporangiate fems. The prothallus of Mohria is considered more advanced than
that of Anemia in the germination pattern of the spores, the presence of mycorrhiza in the cushion, the permanently lateral
position of the meristematic region and the simpler trichome types.
UITTREKSEL
Die sporofiet van Mohria en Anemia (Anemiaceae) verskil morfologies van mekaar. Ooreenkomste in hul anatomie.
trigome, spore en chromosoomgetalle toon egter duidelik dat hierdie genusse verwant is. Die gametofiet van Anemiaceae is in
baie opsigte primitief wanneer dit met die van ander leptosporangiate varings vergelyk word. Die protallus van Mohria word as
meer gevorderd beskou as die van Anemia in die ontkiemingspatroon van die spore, die teenwoordigheid van mikorisa in die
protalluskussing, die meristematiese streek wat permanent in ’n laterale posisie bly en die meer eenvoudige trigoomtipes.
INTRODUCTION
Mohria Swartz, together with Anemia Swartz, Schizaea
J. Smith, Actinostachys Wall, and Lygodium Swartz are
commonly placed in a single family, the Schizaeaceae
(Engler & Prantl 1898-1902; Bower 1923; Christensen
1938; Copeland 1947; Tryon & Tryon 1982; Tryon &
Lugardon 1990), because of their exindusiate, mono-
sporangiate sori and characteristic apical ring of annulus
cells. Eggert & Delevoryas (1967) have shown, however,
that ‘schizaeaceous’ sporangia evolved independently in
coenopteridid derivatives that are quite unrelated to the
schizaeoid fems. Senftenbergia Corda, formerly included
in the Schizaeales (Reed 1947) because of its apical an-
nulus, has been noted to occur on zygopteridid foliage
(Mickel 1974). This sporangium type therefore appears to
be polyphyletic in origin. The subdivision of the schi-
zaeoid assemblage into distinct families, Anemiaceae
(. Anemia and Mohria ), Lygodiaceae ( Lygodium ) and
Schizaeaceae ( Schizaea and Actinostachys ) has recently
gained wider acceptance (Nayar 1970; Bierhorst 1971;
Love et al. 1977; Clifford & Constantine 1980; De la Sota
& Morbelli 1987).
Although Anemia and Mohria are dissimilar in mor-
phology they are evidently related in view of similarities
in their anatomy (Prantl 1881; Bower 1918; Roux et al.
1992), trichomes (Mickel 1962; Roux 1992a), spores
(Mickel 1962; Hill 1977, 1979; Dettman & Clifford 1991;
Roux 1992b) and chromosome numbers (n = 38, 76).
Bower (1923) discouraged the use of gametophyte
morphology in pteridophyte classification. However, stu-
dies in that field were continued and results have proven
* National Botanical Institute, Compton Herbarium, Private Bag X7,
Claremont 7735.
MS. received: 1992-08-03.
useful as taxonomic and phylogenetic tools. The purpose
of the present study is to summarize previously published
work, and to extend the information on the anatomy and
morphology of the prothallus. All the information relevant
to the prothallus of Mohria is synthesized and analysed.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Anatomical studies were carried out on prothalli col-
lected in the wild. Wax embedding was done using stan-
dard techniques (Johansen 1940). Serial sections 8-10 pm
thick were taken with a rotary microtome and stained with
fast green and safranin. Photography was done with a
Zeiss ‘Axoscop’ fitted with a M35W camera. Ilford PanF
film was used throughout.
SEM studies were done on spores cultivated on clay
pots. The prothalli were critical-point dried using CO2 as
a transitional fluid. Specimens were affixed to aluminium
stubs using glue and sputter coated with Au/Pd and were
viewed in a Cambridge S200 SEM at 5 kV.
Specimens examined
Mohria caffrorum (L.) Desv., 3318 (Cape Town): Stellenbosch, (-DD),
Roux 2363.
M. marginalis (Sav.) J.P. Roux, 2829 (Harrismith): Cathedral Peak,
(-CC), Roux 2297.
M. vestita Bak., 2430 (Pilgrim's Rest): Graskop-Sabie rd, (-DD), Roux
2236. 2630 (Carolina): Swaziland, (-DB), Roux 2261 .
Voucher specimens are all deposited in the Compton
Herbarium (NBG).
192
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Spore germination
Atkinson (1960, 1962), based her observations on
spore germination in Mohria and Anemia on whole
mounts and found the pattern in both these genera to be
identical. Atkinson (1960, 1962) recorded the first division
of the spore protoplast to be in an equatorial plane, form-
ing an apical cell at the proximal pole, this being the pole
bearing the triradiate scar, and a distal cell at the distal
pole. With the second division the apical cell divides at
a right angle to the first to form a larger green prothallial
cell and a smaller, almost colourless, rhizoidal cell (Figure
1). Nayar & Kaur (1968, 1971) categorised this germina-
tion pattern as polar and more specifically as the Anemia-
type.
Observations made by Raghavan & Huckaby (1980)
on sectioned material are in conflict with those of Atkin-
son (1960, 1962). They convincingly showed that in Moh-
ria the first division is in an equatorial plane resulting in
a larger distal cell at the distal pole and a smaller rhizoidal
cell at the proximal pole. With the second division, how-
ever, it is the distal cell that divides to form a larger distal
cell and a smaller protonemal cell (Figure 1 ). This pattern
corresponds with the Osmunda- type of polar germination
as defined by Nayar & Kaur (1968, 1971).
Raghavan & Huckaby (1980) found Mohria and Ane-
mia to be dissimilar. In Anemia , as in Mohria , the first
division is in an equatorial plane giving rise to a larger
distal cell at the distal pole. However, at the proximal pole
a smaller protonemal cell is formed. With the second cel-
lular division the distal cell divides to form a larger distal
cell and a smaller rhizoidal cell (Figure 1 ). This pattern
of spore germination does not fit into the scheme of Nayar
& Kaur (1971).
The distinct modes of gennination in Mohria and Ane-
mia probably indicate different trends of specialization
which is also evident in the sporophyte morphology. The
origin of the rhizoid and protonemal cell in Mohria by a
route similar to that seen in genera considered advanced,
confirm its specialized status.
Prothallial development
Prothallial development in Mohria (Bauke 1878; At-
kinson 1960) and Anemia (Momose 1949; Twiss 1910;
Kaur 1961; Atkinson 1962) is known in some detail and
shows no differences which may be of any significance.
Following the formation of the prothallial cell it continues
to grow and divide by transverse divisions producing a
filament five to six cells long. Longitudinal divisions are
soon evident in cells behind the apex and these continue
both in an anterior and posterior direction. Vertical, lon-
gitudinal and oblique divisions take place and the position
of the localized dividing area in relation to the rest of the
expanding but less rapidly growing gametophytes deter-
mines the shape of the early cellular plate. The margin of
the prothalli may be variously lobed. I often found uni-
cellular trichomes to be associated with the sinuses. A true
apical initial is evidently never formed. A large wing is
eventually formed with the more rapidly dividing meri-
stem in a lateral position which, in Mohria , is maintained
throughout the life of the plant. Circumstances contribu-
ting to the lateral position of the meristem can be ascribed
to the anticlinal divisions which are more numerous than
periclinal divisions. Also no wing is formed on the prox-
imal side of the meristem but only hairs and gametangia.
Divisions in a third plane give rise to a cushion directly
behind the meristem. The gametophyte grows at first more
or less parallel to the substrate but as the cushion contin-
ues to develop the thallus assumes an oblique position
supported by long rhizoids. In Mohria the prothallus even-
tually becomes upright.
Mature prothallus
In the mature prothallus of Mohria the lateral meristem
remains hidden by the continued development of the vo-
luminous spiralling wing (Figure 2A). The older basal
parts of the wing eventually turn brown as the thallus
grows upwards. Marginal areas of all but the last formed
parts of the wing are irregular in outline. The wings are
one cell layer thick except close to the cushion where it
may be two cells thick. As growth continues the massive
cushion grows upwards and appears as a column. Small
flaps of sterile tissue often appear on the cushion. These
flaps of tissue may become winglike and aid in photosyn-
MOHRIA (Raghavan & Huckaby 1980)
^^||||^
MOHRIA & ANEMIA (Atkinson 1960, 19621 /|TTT|\
4|||^
ANEMIA (Raghavan & Huckaby 19801
FIGURE 1 . — Spore germination pat-
terns in Mohria and Anemia as
observed by Atkinson (1960,
1962) and Raghavan & Huck-
aby (1980). Dark-coloured =
spore or distal cell; vertical
lines = protonemal cell; dots =
rhizoidal cell.
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
193
FIGURE 2. — Prothallus andprothallial structures in Mohria vestita, Roi£x 2261. A, mature prothallus showing spirally formed wing; B. prothallus
cushion showing interspersed antheridia, archegonia and trichomes; C, three-celled hair on prothallus wing; D. unicellular hair on
prothallus wing; E, two-celled hair on prothallus wing; F, mature antheridium on abaxial surface of prothallus cushion; G. archegonium
on abaxial surface of prothallus cushion; H, cushion of M. vestita, Roux 2236 , prothallus showing endofungal hyphae (H). Scale bars:
A, 2 mm; B. 500 pm; C, E, 50 pm; D, F, 20 pm; G. 100 pm; H, x 1000.
194
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
thesis. Antheridia, although mostly confined to the poste-
rior regions of the thalli may occur interspersed with ar-
chegonia (Figure 2B & G) which are formed later than
the antheridia. As the columnar cushion increases in
height, archegonia and hairs continue to be fomied in
great numbers. Abundant rhizoids are formed on the cush-
ion. Older rhizoids are brown, long and stiff and continue
to be produced along the columnar cushion. Mature thalli
of Mohria are chlorophyllous and mycorrhizal (Figure
2H) with the mycorrhiza restricted to the ventral side of
the cushion. The endophytic fungus evidently plays only
a minor role in the nutrition of the thallus, as in cultivated
material, where the fungus is absent, the thalli show no
adverse effects.
In Anemia, cells on the proximal side of the meristem
grow outwards until a small wing is formed. As this wing
becomes larger, the meristem is carried into a vertical po-
sition and the only indication of an earlier lateral meristem
is the inequality of the wings. This change in position of
the meristem is accompanied by the development of a
thick cushion bulging towards the ventral side, and by
uplifting and recurving of the wings over the dorsal sur-
face of the cushion (Atkinson 1962). Unlike Mohria the
near vertical position of the prothallus is not maintained.
In Anemia the thalli are elongate-cordate in form, more
or less prostrate in position, green at the anterior end and
dying off behind. Rhizoids and archegonia are produced
in great numbers on the ventral surface of the cushion.
Nayar & Kaur (1971) suggested the more primitive
thallus to be dorsiventral with a massive median midrib
and heavy wings several cells thick near the midrib but
progressively becoming one cell layer thick towards the
margins. In this respect the prothalli of Mohria and Ane-
mia can be considered primitive. A step in advancement
in Mohria and Anemia, however, is the elimination of the
apical initial and the development of a multicellular mer-
istematic region. Nayar & Kaur (1971) furthermore sug-
gested that among those genera with a thalloid-cordate
type gametophyte, the most primitive is the symmetrical
type. In Anemia the prothallus is temporarily asymmetrical
but later becomes symmetrical. The gametophyte of Moh-
ria remains permanently asymmetrical and is therefore
considered more advanced.
Prothallial trichomes
The thallus of Mohria bears small one- to three-celled
hairs (Figure 2C) on the wing and cushion surfaces among
the antheridia and archegonia. Atkinson (1960) found
most hairs in older thalli to occur mainly on the surface
of the cushion. My observations, however, showed that
the cushion is not significantly more hairy than the wings.
Unicellular trichomes, up to 60 pm long, similar to the
naviculate trichomes found on the fronds of the sporo-
phyte (Roux 1992a), are the most common type in Mohria
and occur on the wings as well as on the cushion (Figure
2D). Two-celled hairs common on young thalli, have pre-
viously been described by Bauke (1878) and Stokey
(1960). The outermost colourless cell is at least twice as
long as the basal cell. A chlorophyllous basal cell very
frequently bears two colourless cells (Figure 2E). This was
also reported by Bauke (1878) and Atkinson (1960). These
cells are usually of unequal size. Atkinson (1960) also
reported branched hairs and hairs up to three cells long
from the wings.
One- to four-celled hairs also occur on mature prothalli
in Anemia. At first, the hairs are marginal, developing
from a cell adjacent to the meristem. As in Mohria, the
basal cell of two-celled hairs is chlorophyllous and the
outer cell colourless. Marginal multicellular hairs have
been reported in some Anemia {A. adiantifolia , A. aurita)
species (Atkinson 1962).
Prothallial trichomes have been considered of little
value in taxonomic and phylogenetic studies (Stokey
1951, 1960; Atkinson & Stokey 1964) because similar tri-
chome types occur in apparently unrelated groups of ferns,
a situation that may be ascribed to parallel evolution. Nev-
ertheless Nayar & Kaur (1971) suggest that the restricted
distribution of hairy prothalli among the various phyletic
groups may be of value in comparative studies. Naked
prothalli appear to be the more primitive condition among
the homosporous ferns. Unicellular hairs are more com-
mon in advanced families such as Polypodiaceae,
Davalliaceae, Lomariopsidaceae and Grammitidaceae and
are usually secretory (Nayar & Kaur 1971). The prothallus
of Schizaeaceae is either subterranean or terrestrial and is
devoid of any trichomes. In Lygodium the prothallus has
been described as naked (Bauke 1878; Twiss 1910) but a
few clavate trichomes have been reported for L. flexuosum
(L.) Swartz ( Nayar & Kaur 1971, contra Mahabale &
Kulkami 1949). I have observed clavate trichomes in a
marginal position in cultured prothalli of L. japonicum
(Thunb.) Swartz. In the Anemiaceae, however, non-secre-
tory, often multicellular trichomes occur.
Gametangia
Antheridium
Antheridia are fonned on the margins and ventral sur-
faces of the thallus in the region of the meristem. They
are produced in great numbers on the cushion and may
extend to the wing. Antheridia in Mohria and Anemia are
similar in ontogeny and morphology. Atkinson (1960,
1962) described the antheridium as developing from a su-
perficial initial. A thin disc-shaped cell is cut off from the
antheridial initial to form a proximal ring cell and a distal
terminal cell. This is followed by the formation of a dome-
shaped wall which divides the terminal cell into an outer
wall or ring cell and an inner primary spermatogenous
cell. A division of the ring cell gives rise to the cover cell
of the antheridium. The antheridium structure is thus typ-
ical of the leptosporangiate ferns (Figure 2F). Successive
division of the spermatogenous cell gives rise to a small
number of sperm. In Mohria and Anemia each spermato-
zoid is contained within a cell wall at the time of release
(Atkinson 1960; Nester 1985). At dehiscence the cover
cell is shed explosively and the spermatocytes emerge one
by one through a pore.
Archegonium
My observations in the ontogeny of the archegonium
in Mohria conform with those of Atkinson (1960). Arche-
gonia are borne on the abaxial side of the cushion only.
In mature archegonia I found the archegonial neck, which
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
195
FIGURE 3. — Section through archegonium of Mohria marginalis, Roux
2297, x 400, E, egg cell; NCC, neck canal cell; VCC, ventral
canal cell.
consists of four cells and up to eight tiers high (Figure
2G), to curve in the direction of the substrate (Figure 2B),
a system which would be advantageous to the fertilization
process. Prior to the opening of the archegonium the distal
part of the neck becomes bulbous and the neck canal cell
contorts to form a globular mass containing two to four
nuclei (Figure 3) confirming Atkinson’s (1960) observa-
tions. The venter is well embedded in the cushion and is
surrounded by a layer of small cells containing a dense
protoplasm. Ontogenetically and structurally the archego-
nia in Mohria and Anemia are similar.
Nayar & Kaur (1971) described an advanced archego-
nium as having a neck consisting of three to four tiers of
cells high, which curve away from the apex and possess
an undivided neck canal cell. Archegonia in Anemiaceae
thus conform largely with the primitive type.
Embryogenesis
The division of the zygote has not been observed by
me or by Atkinson (1960, 1962). De la Sota & Morbelli
(1987), however, claim it to be of the ‘leptosporangiate’
type, in which the first division is longitudinal or parallel
to the main axis of the archegonium.
The young embryo of Mohria is protected by a well-
developed calyptra (Figure 4A). Initially only the foot and
the stem can be identified. The foot is well embedded in
the ground tissue of the prothallus cushion. The young
embryos I examined showed the frond to differentiate be-
fore the root. The stem soon developed an apical initial
with three cutting faces. The primary root developed en-
dogenously and contained a large apical initial and a well-
defined rootcap even before breaking through the cortical
tissue of the stem (Figure 4B).
Like Atkinson (1960) I also found prothalli attached to
young sporophytes containing up to five fronds. Sections
through these prothalli show that the cell walls separating
the foot from the prothallus tissue thicken and form an
abscission layer. Mycorrhiza were also observed in tissue
FIGURE 4. — Transverse sections of embryo in Mohria "ertita, Roux
2236. A, young embryo showing calyptra (C), indicated by
arrows, x 68; B, first root before breaking through prothallus
tissue showing root cap and large apical initial, x 270; C, prothal-
lus of a developing young plant with first root, frond and shoot
apex, x 68. A, apical initial; C, calyptra; F, frond; R, root; RA.
root apex; RC. root cap.
196
Bothalia 23,2 ( 1993)
of the young sporophyte, especially the stem and roots,
as well as in the tissues of the gametophyte.
Vascular tissue in the root, stem and frond is formed
at an early stage (Figure 4C). Initially the tracheids show
spirally arranged secondary thickenings but later pitting
is of the scalariform or reticulate scalariform type.
CONCLUSIONS
Classification and phylogeny of the Pteridophyta is
largely based on the dominant sporophyte generation. The
small, usually overlooked, gametophyte generation or pro-
thallus may, however, also contribute to the understanding
of the evolutionary processes and phylogeny of the ferns.
Bower (1923) and Holttum ( 1949), cautious of the effects
of external influences during the development of the pro-
thallus, realised the meagre but important contribution it
can make with a view to classification.
Stokey (1951) and Nayar & Kaur (1971) suggested
possible evolutionary trends in the structure of the pro-
thallus and gametangia. Features that are considered ad-
vanced in the prothallus of the leptosporangiate ferns are:
a small, short-lived, autotrophic, symmetric, cordate thal-
lus with a centrally situated meristematic region and
poorly developed midrib. Trichomes are present but are
simple, unicellular and secretory. The antheridium is a
three-cellular structure, consisting of a basal, ring and cap
cell. The cap cell dehisces in its entirety and the anther-
idium has a small sperm output. The archegonia are small,
form later than the antheridia, and are situated closer to
the meristematic region. The mature archegoniunr has a
neck that curves away from the meristem and consists of
up to four tiers of cells. The neck canal cell is undivided.
Considering these changes, the prothallus of Ane-
miaceae is in many respects phylogenetically primitive, a
feature which is also expressed in many morphological
features of the sporophyte. On grounds of the sporophyte,
Mohria is considered phylogenetically more advanced
than Anemia (Bower 1923; Mickel 1962). The perma-
nently laterally placed meristematic region and the ab-
sence of multicellular hairs from the prothallus are
supportive of such an assessment.
It is thus evident that the prothallus can make an im-
portant contribution to an understanding of the phylogeny
of the Pteridophyta at the family as well as at the generic
level.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I wish to express my sincerest thanks to Dr J. Manning
for valuable suggestions.
REFERENCES
ATKINSON, L.R. I960. The Schizaeaceae: the gametophyte of Mohria.
Phytomorphology 10: 351-367.
ATKINSON, L.R. 1962. The Schizaeaceae: the gametophyte of Anemia.
Phytomorphology 12: 264-288.
ATKINSON, L.R. & STOKEY, A.G. 1964. Comparative morphology of
the gametophyte of the homosporous ferns. Phytomorphology 14:
51-70.
BAUKE, H. 1878. Beitriige zur Keimungsgeschichte der Schizaeaceen.
Jahrhiicher J'iir wissenschaftliche Botanik 1 1 : 603-650.
BIERHORST, D.W. 1971. Morphology of vascular plants. Macmillan,
New York.
BOWER. F.O. 1918. Studies in the phylogeny of the Filicales. VII. The
Pteroideae. Annals of Botany 32: 1-68.
BOWER. F.O. 1923. The ferns ( Filicales ), Vol. 1. University Press,
Cambridge.
CHRISTENSEN. C. 1938. Filicinae. In F. Verdoom . Manual of Pteridol-
ogy. Nijhoff, The Hague.
CLIFFORD, H.T. & CONSTANTINE, J. 1980. Ferns, fern allies and
conifers of Australia. University of Queensland Press, St Lucia,
Queensland.
COPELAND, E.B. 1947. Genera filicum. Chronica Botanica, Waltham
Mass.
DE LA SOTA, E.R. & MORBELLI, M.A. 1987. Schizaeales. Phy-
tomorpliology 37: 365-393.
DETTMANN, M.E. & CLIFFORD, H.T. 1991. Spore morphology of
Anemia. Mohria. and Ceratopteris (Filicales). American Journal
of Botany 78: 303-325.
EGGERT. O.A. & DELEVORYAS, T. 1967. Studies in Paleozoic ferns:
Sennaya. gen. nov. and its bearing on Filicalean evolution in the
Paleozoic. Palaeontographica 120B: 169-180.
ENGLER. A. & PRANTL, K. 1898-1902. Die naturlichen
Pflanzenfamilien 1 .4. Engelmann, Leipzig.
HILL, S.R. 1977. Spore morphology of Anemia subgenus Coptophyllum.
American Fern Journal 67: 11-17.
HILL, S.R. 1979. Spore morphology of Anemia subgenus Anemia. Amer-
ican Fern Journal 69: 71-79.
HOLTTUM, R.E. 1949. Classification of ferns. Biological Review 53:
123-158.
JOHANSEN, D.A. 1940. Plant microtechnique. McGraw-Hill, New
York.
KAUR, S. 1961. Gametophyte of Anemia phyllitidis (L.) Swartz. Science
and Culture 27: 347-350.
LOVE. A., LOVE, D. & PICH1 SERMOLLI. R.E.G. 1977. Cytotaxo-
nomic atlas of the Pteridophyta. Cramer, Vaduz.
MICKEL, J.T. 1962. A monographic study of the fern genus Anemia ,
subgenus Coptophyllum. Iowa State Journal of Science 36: 349-
482.
MICKEL, J.T 1974. Phyletic lines in the modem ferns. Annals of the
Missouri Botanical Garden 61: 474-482.
MOMOSE, S. 1949. On the prothallium of Lygodium and Anemia. Jour-
nal of Japanese Botany 24: 128-132.
NAYAR, B.K. 1970. A phylogenetic classification of the homosporous
ferns. Taxon 19: 229-236.
NAYAR, B.K. & KAUR, S. 1968. Spore germination in homosporous
ferns. Journal of Palynology 4: 1-14.
NAYAR, B.K. & KAUR, S. 1971. Gametophytes of homosporous ferns.
Botanical Review 37: 296-396.
NESTER. J.E. 1985. Scanning electron microscopy of antheridia and
archegonia of Anemia mexicana Klotzsch. American Journal of
Botany 72: 777-780.
PRANTL, K. 1881. Untersuchungen zur Morphologie der Gefass-
kryptogamen. II. Die Schizaeaceen. Leipzig.
RAGHAVAN, V. & HUCKABY, C.S. 1980. A comparative study of c; II
division patterns during germination of spores of Anemia. Lygo-
dium and Mohria (Schizaeaceae). American Journal of Botany
67: 653-663.
REED. C.F. 1947. The phylogeny and ontogeny of the Pteropsida. I.
Schizaeales. Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana II, 21: 71-197.
ROUX, J.P. 1992a. Systematic studies in the genus Mohria (Pteridophyta:
Anemiaceae). II. Comparative vestiture morphology and phylog-
eny. South African Journal of Botany 58: 215-219.
ROUX, J.P. 1992b. Systematic studies in the genus Mohria (Anemiaceae:
Pteridophyta). III. Comparative sporangium and spore morphol-
ogy. Bothalia 22: 199-204.
ROUX. JR, VAN DER WALT. .I.J.A. & VAN DER MERWE, R.B. 1992.
Systematic studies in the genus Mohria (Pteridophyta: An-
emiaceae). I. Comparative morphology and anatomy of the rhi-
zome and frond. South African Journal of Botany 58: 83-89.
STOKEY, A.G. 1951. The contribution by the gametophyte to classifica-
tion of the homosporous ferns. Phytomorpliology 1: 39-58.
STOKEY. A.G. 1960. Multicellular and branched hairs on the fern game-
tophyte. American Feni Journal 50: 78-87.
TRYON, A.F. & LUGARDON, B. 1990. Spores of the Pteridophyta.
Springer- Verlag, New York.
TRYON, R.M. & TRYON, A.F. 1982. Ferns and allied plants with
special reference to tropical America. Springer- Verlag, New
York.
TWISS, E. 1910. The prothalli of Anemia and Lygodium. Botanical
Gazette 49: 168-181.
Bothalia 23,2: 197-206(1993)
Synopsis of the genus Disparago (Asteraceae)
M. KOEKEMOER*
Keywords: Asteraceae, Disparago , new sections, synopsis, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
The genus Disparago comprises nine very distinct species and is here divided into four new, well-defined sections:
Monticapra Koekemoer, comprising three recently described species, Disparago gongylodes Koekemoer, D. barbata
Koekemoer, D. pilosa Koekemoer; section Laevicarpa Koekemoer (D. kolbei) and section Uniflos Koekemoer (D. tortilis )
which are both monotypic, and section Disparago which has four species (D. ericoides. D. anomala, D. kraussii, D. laxifolia).
The previous revision (Levyns 1936a) included seven species of which six are retained. A key to the sections and the species and
a diagrammatic key are given as well as diagnostic descriptions, synonyms, typification and notes on the distribution and habitat
of each species.
UITTREKSEL
Die genus Disparago bestaan uit nege baie duidelike spesies en word hier verdeel in vier nuwe, goed omskryfde seksies:
Monticapra Koekemoer, met drie onlangs beskryfde spesies, Disparago gongylodes Koekemoer, D. barbata Koekemoer, D.
pilosa Koekemoer; seksie Laevicarpa Koekemoer ( D . kolbei ) en seksie Uniflos Koekemoer (D. tortilis) wat albei monotipies
is en seksie Disparago met vier spesies (D. ericoides, D. anomala, D. kraussii, D. laxifolia). Die vorige hersiening (Levyns
1936a) het sewe spesies ingesluit waarvan ses behou word, 'n Sleutel tot die seksies, die spesies en 'n diagrammatiese sleutel
word gegee sowel as diagnostiese beskrywings, sinonieme, tipifikasie en notas oor die verspreiding en habitat van elke spesie.
INTRODUCTION
The genus Disparago is confined to South Africa and
occurs in the fynbos of the southwestern Cape. It now
comprises nine species: six retained from the previous re-
vision (Levyns 1936a) and three recently described
(Koekemoer 1991). The genus is remarkable in many
ways — the biogeography, morphology, evolutionary de-
velopment and speciation (Koekemoer in prep, a, b).
There are many unanswered questions about Disparago
and the genus holds challenging clues to a better under-
standing of the fynbos flora.
Disparago Gaertn.. Fructibus et seminibus plan-
tarum 2: 463, t. 173 (1791); DC.: 257 (1837); Cass.: 348
(1819); Less.: 362 (1832); Benth. 323 (1873); Harv.: 277
(1894); Schltr.: 203 (1900); Levyns: 95 (1936a); Dyer:
682 (1975). Type species: Disparago ericoides (Berg.)
Gaertn. (= Stoebe ericoides Berg.).
Wigandia Neck.: 95 (1790) non Kunth; Less.: 362
(1832).
Seriphia et Stoebes spp. auctt.
The name Disparago is listed as conserved, although
conservation against Wigandia was superfluous (Rickett
& Stafleu 1960).
Shrublets or shrubs, usually profusely, sympodially
branched, larger plants dense, upright or cushion-like and
spreading; new shoots developing from below terminal
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001, South
Africa.
MS. received: 1992-02-27.
inflorescence of previous season. Leaves alternate, small,
filiform, oblong or obovate; adaxial surface villous, hairs
unicellular: margins entire, involute; apex mucronate,
apiculate or obtuse. Synflorescences terminal. Heads sol-
itary, in small clusters or in very dense globose, sub-
globose or cylindrical aggregations; 1 -flowered or up to
10-flowered; individual heads homogamous or heteroga-
mous, composed of ray and/or tubular flowers. Involucre
in 1-4 series, chaffy, lacking a distinct stereome, broadly
or narrowly cymbiform; apices acute or acuminate; mar-
gins entire, sometimes undulate or with clavate out-
growths. Ray flowers 3-lobed, female or sterile, white or
pink, ray 1. 5-4.0 x 1. 2-3.0 mm; cypselas fertile or sterile;
surface glabrous, puberulous or villous. Tubular flowers
5-lobed, lobes erect or spreading star-like, male or her-
maphrodite, white or pink; cypselas fertile or sterile, sur-
face glabrous, puberulous or villous. Pappus present or
absent, caducous or persistent, 3— 1 5(— 20), plumose or
barbed bristles, free or connate in a ring or tube at base.
Distribution : the main area of distribution is the fynbos
of the southwestern Cape, a winter rainfall area. One spe-
cies, D. tortilis , is more widely distributed and spreads
along the south and east coast to Umtamvuna in Natal
where it occurs in relict fynbos areas. In the western Cape
the genus does not occur further north than the Great Win-
terhoek mountains near Porterville. The inland boundaries
of its distribution are along the mountains bordering the
karoo or the transition between fynbos and other biomes.
DISCUSSION
The original generic description by Gaertner (1791 ) in-
cluded only species now accommodated in the section
Disparago. The generic description given above was
198
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
therefore expanded to include all the other species subse-
quently found.
Disparago can be distinguished from its closest rela-
tives, Stoebe and Elytropappus , by the presence of ray
flowers in some/all the heads of the synflorescence. Al-
though the monotypic genus Bryomorphe also has ray
flowers, it is distinguished by a moss-like habit. The leaf
morphology of Disparago is very similar to that of Stoebe
and it is therefore very difficult to identify sterile material.
Most species of Elytropappus can be distinguished by the
presence of glands on the leaves. Generic and infrageneric
relationships will be discussed in a separate paper
(Koekemoer in prep. a).
SPECIES TREATMENT
The genus Disparago can be divided into four natural
groups which are here treated as sections. Section
Monticapra: D. gongylodes, D. barbata, D. pilosa. Sec-
tion Laevicarpa: D. kolbei. Section Uniflos: D. tortilis.
Section Disparago: D. anomala, D. ericoides, D. kraussii,
D. laxifolia.
Key to sections
la Ray flowers sterile or reduced section Disparago
lb Ray flowers female:
2a Heads 1-flowered section Uniflos
2b Heads 5-8-flowered:
3a Cypselas of both ray and tubular flowers fully developed;
tubular flowers hermaphrodite section Laevicarpa
3b Cypselas of ray flowers fully developed, those of tubular
flowers reduced; tubular flowers male . section Monticapra
In the two monotypic sections ( Uniflos and Laevi-
carpa), the cypselas of both the ray and tubular flowers
are fertile. The main differences between the sections are
in the cypsela surface, the number of flowers per head
and the arrangement of heads. Species in the section
Monticapra have inflorescences similar to those of
Bryomorphe and further investigation is needed to deter-
mine whether Bryomorphe, a monotypic genus, should be
given generic status.
Key to species (see also diagrammatic key in Table 1)
la Ray flowers female, cypsela fully developed:
2a Heads 1-flowered 5. D. tortilis
2b Heads 5-8(-10)-flowered:
3a Cypselas fully developed in ray and in tubular flowers . . .
4. D. kolbei
3b Cypselas fully developed in ray flowers, sterile in tubular
flowers:
4a Leaves obovate 1 . D. gongylodes
4b Leaves linear or lanceolate:
5a Pappus plumose, connate at base; leaves spreading;
involucre tomentose 3. D. pilosa
5b Pappus barbed, loose; leaves appressed; involucre
smooth 2. D. barbata
lb Ray flowers sterile, cypselas reduced:
6a Cypsela surface woolly 7. D. ericoides
6b Cypsela surface puberulous:
7a Pappus absent 6. D. anomala
7b Pappus present:
8a Leaf tips obtuse; leaves more than half their length apart,
mostly spreading; west of 20 degrees longitude;
flowering in spring 9. D. laxifolia
8b Leaf tips mucronate; leaves less than half their length
apart, mostly appressed at least near inflorescence;
east of 20 degrees longitude; flowering in autumn .
8. D. kraussii
TABLE 1.— Diagrammatic key to the species of Disparago
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
199
Sectio 1. Monticapra Koekemoer, sect, nov., capi-
tula heterogama, 5-8-flora; flores radii feminei; flores
disci fungentes masculini; flores radii albi, flores disci
vinacei; cypselae florum radii fertiles, florum disci steriles.
Ad altitudines altas limitata. Typus sectionis: D. gon-
gylodes Koekemoer.
Capitula heterogamous, 5-8-flowered; ray flowers fe-
male; tubular flowers functionally male; ray flowers
white, tubular flowers wine-red; cypselas fertile in ray
flowers, sterile in tubular flowers. Confined to high alti-
tudes.
The name Monticapra was chosen in honour of Miss
E. Esterhuysen (with all due respect), who like a ‘moun-
tain goat’ explored remote mountains to discover the three
species in this section.
1. Disparago gongylodes Koekemoer in Bothalia
21: 158 (1991). Type: Cape, Great Winterhoek Wilderness
Area, Esterhuysen 35788 (BOL, holo.!; NBG!, K!, PRE
(2x)!, S!, STE!).
Shrublets (50—) 100-350 mm tall, profusely branched
mainly from base. Leaves obovate, 2.5-3.5(-5.0) x 1-2
mm, involute at margins only, adaxial surface villous,
apex obtuse; pedicel twisted near base. Synflorescence of
5-12 heads in a loose arrangement. Involucre of about 12
bracts in three series, outermost series foliaceous, inner
series broadly cymbiform, narrowing to the innermost se-
ries; dark brown, often with reddish tint, margins often
undulate in upper half, apex acuminate and often reflexed.
Heads composed of two ray flowers and five tubular flow-
ers. Ray flowers white, female, rays 3-4 x 1. 5-2.5 mm;
cypselas fertile, surface woolly. Tubular flowers pink,
male; cypselas sterile, surface puberulous. Pappus present
in ray and tubular flowers, plumose, of 2 or 3 caducous
hairs, not connate, capillaries in pappus tips inflated and
these tips obtuse and loosely coalescent, tips of capillaries
acute in lower part.
Distribution: this species is only known from one area:
the top of the Great Winterhoek Mountain near Porterville
(Figure 1 ) where it grows very abundantly on coarse Table
Mountain Sandstone, on flat areas where small Restio spe-
cies are dominant.
Specimens examined
CAPE. — 3319 (Porterville) Great Winterhoek Reserve, (-AA), Es-
terhuysen 34840 (PRE, BOL), 35788 (BOL, K, NBG, STE); Twentyfour
Rivers Mountains, (-AA), Esterhuysen 21894 (BOL, PRE); Great
Winterhoek Mountains, Farm Berghof, (-AA), Koekemoer 315, 440
(PRE); Great Winterhoek Reserve, 2 km from Zuurvlakte entrance, (-
AA), Koekemoer 439 (PRE).
2. Disparago barbata Koekemoer in Bothalia 21:
158 (1991). Type: Cape, Matroosberg, SE slopes, Ester-
huysen 28615 (BOL 48345, holo.!; BOL 48346!, PRE!,
S!).
Shrublets 200-400 mm tall, erect or trailing. Leaves
filiform, 4-9 x 0.5-0. 8 mm, spirally twisted, acute,
spreading. Synflorescence of numerous heads crowded in
ovoid secondary heads 10-15 mm in diameter, dark brown
and globular. Heads with three ray flowers and three tu-
bular flowers. Involucre of about 12 bracts in 3 series,
4.5-6.0 x 0.6-1. 3 mm, narrowly cymbiform, abaxial sur-
face sparsely villoUs, margins entire, apex acuminate,
often reflexed, usually tri-coloured: light brown near base,
dark brown towards apex and tinted red in centre. Ray
flowers female, ray 2.0-2. 5 x ± 1.5 mm, white; cypselas
fertile, puberulous, dorsiventrally flattened. Tubular flow-
ers functionally male, purple-red; cypselas sterile, puberu-
lous. Pappus present in ray and tubular flowers, of 2 or
3 bristles, barbed, caducous, not connate.
Distribution: this species is only known from the
Matroosberg near De Dooms in the southwestern Cape
(Figure 1).
Specimens examined
CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): Matroosberg SE slopes, (-BC), Es-
terhuysen 28615 (BOL, PRE, S); Matroosberg E slopes above De Dooms,
(-BC), Esterhuysen 28119 (BOL).
3. Disparago pilosa Koekemoer in Bothalia 21: 159
(1991). Type: Cape, Roodeberg, near Matroosberg, N
slopes, Esterhuysen 29721 (BOL 48349, holo.!; BOL
48350!, NBG!, PRE!, S!).
Shrublets, up to 250 mm tall, profusely branched from
base, branches woolly or sparsely villous, appearing 4-an-
gled because of leaf arrangement. Leaves lanceolate, 2-6
x 0.5-0.9 mm, appressed or slightly spreading, not spirally
twisted. Synflorescence with secondary heads composed
of a few heads, loosely grouped. Heads with 3 ray flowers
and 5 tubular flowers. Involucre 11-13, in 2 or 3 series,
outermost broadly cymbiform, decreasing in width to the
inner series which can be filiform, margins undulate,
sometimes with membranous edge, apex acuminate,
sometimes reflexed, adaxial surface villous in lower half,
bicolorous, yellow-brown in lower half, black-brown in
upper half with reddish tint near apex. Ray flowers female,
white, 2. 5-3.5 x 1. 5-2.0 mm; cypselas fertile, surface
puberulous. Tubular flowers functionally male, reddish
pink, often with glands on surface of lobes; cypselas ster-
ile. Pappus present in ray and tubular flowers, plumose,
of about 10 hairs, connate in a ring at base.
Distribution: this species has only been collected on
Matroosberg, Roodeberg, Roelofsberg and at the foot of
Bokkeveld Sneeukop in the Worcester District (Figure 1).
It is reported to occur in sand in rocky areas.
Specimens examined
CAPE. — 3219 (Wuppertal): Ceres Dist., northern base of
Roelofsberg, (-CC), Esterhuysen 34675 (BOL, S); Waboomsrivier, Cold
Bokkeveld, (-CC), Hanekom 624 (PRE). 3319 (Worcester) Ceres Dist.,
Rosendal & Bo-Rosendal, at foot of Bokkeveld Sneeukop, (-AB), Es-
terhuysen 33928 (BOL, S); Ceres Dist., Roodeberg near Matroosberg, N
slopes, (-BC), Esterhuysen 29721 (BOL, NBG, PRE, S); Matroosberg
northern plateau, (-BC), Esterhuysen 27704 (BOL); Matroosberg near
the top along pipeline, (-BC), Koekemoer 361 (PRE).
Sectio 2. Laevicarpa Koekemoer , sect, nov., capit-
ula heterogama, 5-8-flora; flores radii feminei; flores disci
hermaphroditi; flores et radii et disci: rosei; cypselae
florum et radii et disci fertiles. Ad montes regionem
200
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
FIGURE 1. — Geographical distribution of D. gongylodes , •; D. barbata,
O; and D. pilosa, ▼.
‘Karoo’ cognitam conterminos limitata. Typus sectionis:
D. kolbei (H. Bol.) Hutch.
Capitula heterogamous, 5-8-flowered; ray flowers fe-
male; tubular flowers hermaphrodite; ray as well as tubu-
lar flowers pink; cypselas fertile in ray as well as tubular
flowers. Confined to mountains bordering the Karoo.
The name Lcieviccirpa refers to the smooth surface of
the cypselas in D. kolbei.
4. Disparago kolbei (H. Bol.) Hutch.-. 511 (1932).
Amphiglossa kolbei Bolus: 394 (1909). Type: Cape, Oudtshoorn Dist.,
Swartberg Pass, Kolbe 1477 (BOL, holo!).
D. rosea Hutch.: 511 (1932); Levyns: 99 (1936a). Type: Cape, Uni-
ondale Dist., hills near Avontuur, Fourcade 1663 (BOL 48241, lecto.!,
here designated; GRA!, PRE!, K).
The name D. kolbei was given to commemorate F.C.
Kolbe, the collector of the type specimen and friend of
H. Bolus.
Shrublets usually 100-300 mm tall, but old plants up
to 700 mm tall and about 1.5 m in diameter. Leaves fili-
form to lanceolate, 2-4 x 0.3-0. 5 mm, shorter leaves
straight and appressed, longer leaves spirally twisted and
spreading, often woolly. Synflorescence of 1— 3(— 5) heads.
Heads with 2 or 3 ray flowers and 2 or 3 tubular flowers.
Involucre of about 10 bracts in 3 series, outermost series
ovate, about 1/3 as long as inner series of broadly cymbi-
form, light brown bracts. Ray flowers female, pink; cyp-
selas fertile, surface glabrous, apical annulus usually well
developed. Tubular flowers hermaphrodite, pink; cypselas
identical to those of ray flowers. Pappus present in all
flowers, of 8-12 plumose hairs, basally connate for about
Vs of their length.
Distribution: this species is confined to the mountain
ranges bordering the Karoo, stretching from Antoniesberg
in the east to the Witteberge in the west (Figure 2).
Specimens examined
CAPE. — 3320 (Ladismith): Witteberg, (-BC), Compton 2689 (BOL),
3335 (STE), 12201 (NBG); Esterhuysen s.n. (NBG); Goldblatt 3794 (K,
PRE, S); Matjiesfontein, Witteberg near radio mast, (-BC), Van Zyl 3561
(PRE, STE); Anysberg, (-DA), Esterhuysen 17325 (BOL), 25986 (BOL,
PRE); Koekemoer 305 (PRE); Marshall 19 (SAAS), 163 (STE); Van Wvk
1032. 1048 (PRE, STE); Van Zyl 3394 (PRE, STE); Vlok 451 (PRE, STE).
3321 (Ladismith): Elandskloof between Vleiland and Seweweekspoort,
(-AD), Moffett & Steensma 3870 (STE). 3322 (Oudtshoorn): Swartberg
Pass, (-AC), Bond 1556 (NBG); Esterhuysen 19683, 28823 (BOL);
Hafstrom & Acocks 2338 (PRE, S); Koekemoer 299, 332 (PRE); Kolbe
1477 (BOL); Levyns 6655 (BOL); Markotter 9946 (STE); Schlechter s.n.
(BOL); Stokoe 9070 (BOL), 58107 (SAM), 65910 (PRE, SAM), 64077
(SAM); Taylor 6974 (PRE, STE); Wall 277 (S); Swartberg, Hat-
tinghskloof, (-AC), Thompson 1319 (PRE, STE); Swartberg, EVKOM-
road on ridge, (-AC), Pienaar 38 (SAAS, STE). 3323 (Willowmore):
Antoniesberg, N slopes, (-AD), Esterhuysen 24944 (BOL); Uniondale,
hills near Avontuur, (-CA), Fourcade 1663 (BOL, GRA, PRE); Union-
dale, hill N of Avontuur, (-CA), Fourcade 4611 (BOL, PRE, STE);
Avontuur, hill NE of Avontuur, about 5 m from beacon, (-CA), Koeke-
moer 486 (PRE); Hoopsberg, accessed from Farm Hoogste Drift, lower
slopes of western ridge, (-CB), Koekemoer 480 (PRE).
Sectio 3. Uniflos Koekemoer , sect, nov., capitula
homogama, uniflora; flores radii feminei; flores disci
hermaphroditi; flores radii et disci: rosei vel albi; cypselae
florurn et radii et disci fertiles. Sectio vulgaris. Typus
sectionis: D. tortilis (DC.) Sch. Bip.
Capitula homogamous, 1-flowered; ray flowers female;
tubular flowers hermaphrodite; colour of ray and tubular
flowers similar: either pink or white; cypselas fertile in
ray as well as tubular flowers. A widespread section.
The name Uniflos refers to the one-flowered heads of
the species in this section.
5. Disparago tortilis (DC.) Sch. Bip. in Jahres-
bericht der Pollichia: 25(181) (1861). Type: C.B.S., Uiten-
hage, Ecklon 1576 (G-DC, lecto., here designated;
microfiche PRE!).
Stoebe tortilis DC. 260 (1837).
D. ericoides auct. non Berg, nec Gaertn.: 463 (1791); Cass.: 348
(1825); DC.: 257 (1837); Harv.: 278 (1894); Levyns: 100 (1936a); R.A.
Dyer: t. 1102(1951).
The name D. tortilis has not been used extensively in
the history of the genus. This taxon was widely known
under a misapplied name, D. ericoides. Although the type
specimen of D. tortilis is very poor, there is no doubt
about its identity or about the identity of D. ericoides.
Shrubs up to 1 m tall, profusely branched, erect or
bushy. Leaves filiform, 4— 8(-10) x 0.5-0.8 mm, spirally
twisted with 1-1 1/2 twists, usually spreading, sometimes
appressed, margins tightly involute, apex mucronate. Syn-
florescence usually with numerous, sometimes only about
5 heads, in usually globose aggregations, or if tubular then
often interrupted at base. Heads 1-flowered, with either
tubular or ray flower. Involucre of 6-8 bracts, in 2 series,
narrowly cymbiform, in outermost series often chaffy in
lower half and foliaceous in upper half. Ray flowers fe-
male, usually pink (various shades), occasionally white,
2. 7-3.3 x 2.5-3.0 mm; cypselas fertile, surface puberu-
lous, apical annulus often well developed. Tubular flowers
hermaphrodite, usually pink, or white, glands sometimes
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
201
FIGURE 2. — Geographical distribution of D. kolbei. ■; D. kraussii, •; and D. laxifolia, O.
present on outside of lobes; cypselas fertile and identical
to those of ray flowers. Pappus usually of 5 plumose hairs,
not connate, occasionally up to 20 hairs in robust forms
and then slightly connate at base.
Distribution of this species is disjunct: it is found from
Jonkershoek and Simon’s Bay along the south and east
coasts (not more than 150 km inland) to the Dweza State
Forest in Transkei and re-appears around Port Edward and
Port Shepstone, where it occurs in what appear to be relict
fynbos areas (Figure 3). D. tortilis is very well adapted
to the grassy fynbos of the eastern Cape and is a pioneer
in disturbed areas.
Specimens examined
NATAL. — 3030 (Port Shepstone): Murchison, (-AA), Medley Wood
3078 (NH); Oribi Gorge, (-CA), Me Clean 578 (PRE. NH); Van Wyk
5415 (PRE); top of Horseman's Point, (-CB). Glen 473 (STE); Oribi
Nature Reserve, footpath between Lukonka Point and Umfezi Point,
(-CB), Abbott 1879 (NH); Fourman's Hill, (-CB), Koekemoer 264
(PRE); Umtamvuna Nature Reserve, Eon Crown, (-CC); Abbott 1929
(NH); Koekemoer 261 (PRE); Uvongo River tributary, Wichman's Farm,
(-CD), Nicholson 1704 (PRE); Port Shepstone Sea Park, (-CD), Strey
8116 (PRE); Umzumbi, (-DA), Medley Wood 12857 (PRE). 3130 (Port
Edward): Port Edward, (-AA), Acocks 10910 (PRE).
CAPE — 3227 (Stutterheim): Dohne Research Station, (-CB), Perks
s.n. (GRA A1370); Mount Coke, (-CD), Sim 1418 (GRA, NBG); East
London, Bonza Bay, (-DD), Acocks 9552 (PRE). 3228 (Butterworth):
Dwesa, (-BD), Abbott 2633 (NH); East London, Kei Mouth, (-CB),
Flanagan 213 (BOL, GRA, NBG, SAM); Stutterheim, Kentani, (-CB),
Pegler 260 (BOL, NBG); East London, Gonubi Springs, (-CC), Acocks
10986 (PRE); Kentani River mouth. (-CC), Galpin 5789 (PRE); Gonubi
Springs, (-CC), Compton 17043 (NBG); Levyns 10826 (BOL). 3318
(Cape Town): Jonkershoek, (-DD), Kruger KR339 (PRE). 3319 (Worces-
ter): Jonaskop, (-DC), Boucher 5012 (PRE). 3320 (Montagu): Witteberg,
(-BC), Humbert 9804 (PRE); Marloth Nature Reserve, (-CD), Taylor
7686 (PRE). 3321 (Ladismith): Garcia’s Pass, (-CC), Leipoldt 16049
(BOL); Fouriesberg, (-DD), Koekemoer 475 (PRE). 3322 (Oudtshoom):
Swartberg. (-AC), Pienaar 41 (STE); Spitskop, (-AD), Koekemoer 33 1
(PRE); Meiringspoort, (-BC), Esterhuysen 24855 (PRE); Swartberg east,
Magas, (-BC), Marshall 253 (PRE); Klein Moeras River, (-CC),
Koekemoer 473 (PRE); Robinson Pass, (-CC), Koekemoer 476 (PRE);
Waboomskraal, (-CD), Lewis 68721 (BOL); Kamanassie Mountains,
Laudina, (-DB), Esterhuysen 18337 (BOL, PRE); Mannetjies Mountain,
(-DB), Esterhuysen 6404 (BOL); Taylor 1469 (SAAS). 3323
(Willowmore): Slypsteen Mountain, (-AC), Esterhuysen 6305 (BOL,
PRE), 6316 (PRE); Antonies Mountain, (-AD), Esterhuysen 24965
(BOL); Potjies River Height, (-CA), Hugo 1473 (PRE. STE); Thompson
964, 1335 (PRE. STE); Hill NE of Avontuur. (-CA); Fourcade 4607
(BOL); Koekemoer 485 (PRE); Langkloof, near Ongelegen siding on
road to Kareedouw, (-CB), Immelman 324 (PRE, STE); Hoopsberg,
(-CB); Esterhuysen 6579 (BOL); Koekemoer 479 (PRE); Kouga Moun-
tains, Farm Hoeree, (-DB), Oelofsen 43 (PRE); Tuschen Bij, Tsitsikama,
(-DD), Fourcade 487 (STE); 7 miles east of Joubertina, (-DD), Ward
5697 (PRE); The Hoek, valley at foot of Outeniqua Mountains, (-DD),
Esterhuysen 10606 (BOL); Joubertina, (-DD), Esterhuysen s.n.
(BOL48263). 3324 (Steytlerville): Baviaanskloof Mountains, between
Smitkraal and Wilgerhof, (-CB), Thompson 1945 (PRE. STE); between
Patensie and Willowmore, (-CB), Koekemoer 281 (PRE); Kareedouw
Pass, (-CC/CD), Fourcade S.D. (STE); Assegaai Bosch road to Karee-
douw. (-CD), Britten 1247 (PRE); Assegaaibosch, (-CD), Breyer 23313
(PRE); Levyns 5589 (BOL); Kareedouw Pass, (-CD), Gillett 1499 (STE);
Koekemoer 324 (PRE); Farm Goedehoop, (-DA), Stirton 9593 (PRE).
3325 (Port Elizabeth): Rietberg, above Kirkwood, (-AD), Nordenstam
282 (S): Somerset Oos, Kommadagga, (-BB), Bayliss BS-1589 (PRE);
Zuurberg. above Slagboom, (-BC), J.R. & B.R. 452 (BOL, GRA);
Zuurberg National Park. Brandrug, (-BC), Koekemoer 64, 169 (PRE);
Addo Elephant Park, Zuurkop, (-BD), Archibald 3867 (PRE); Fer-
niebrae, (-BD), Koekemoer 63 (PRE); Zuurberg Inn, (-BD), Koekemoer
170 (PRE); Addo Elephant Park, Zuurkop, (-BD), Barnard 575 (PRE);
Zuurberg Pass, (-BD), Nordenstam 355, 367 (S), Groendal Wilderness
Catchment area, (-CA), Scharf 1172, 1455, 1608 (PRE); Port Elizabeth,
1 mile west of Rocklands, (-CA), Wisura 2858 (NBG); Port Elizabeth,
(-CB), Cruden 441 (GRA); Couga Mtns, (-CB), Taylor 899 (NBG); Van
Stadens Reserve, (-CC), Dahlstrand 1977, 2538 (STE), 3209. 3220
(PRE); Mkhotyana 20 (GRA); 18 km from Port Elizabeth on road to Van
Stadens Pass, (-CC), Koekemoer 61 (PRE); Witteklip, (-CC) .Rodin 1011
(P, PRE); near Port Elizabeth, (-DC), Tyson 2179 (PRE, SAM, STE);
flats near Van Stadens River Mtn, (-CC), Ecklon & Zeyher s.n. (GRA);
Blue Mtn, Loerie, (-CC), Dix 7 (GRA); Van Stadens Mtn. (-CC), Ecklon
c£ Zeyher 51 (5.2) (SAM ), 166 (4.2) (S); Zeyher 712 (NBG); Bethelsdorp.
(-CD). Bolus s.n. (NBG. PRE); Van Stadens River, (-CD), Koekemoer
323 (PRE); Port Elizabeth, Springs Nature Reserve. (-CD), Olivier 2517
(GRA. PRE); Ten Top Hill, Groendal, (-CD), Olivier 3193 (PRE);
Uitenhage, (-CD), Pappe s.n. (GRA); near ‘Thees’, Van Stadens River,
(-CD), Scott Elliot 295 (NBG); Theescomb. (-CD), Bolus s.n. (BOL);
Van Stadens Reserve, (-CD), Pienaar 57 (GRA); 14 km NW of
Rocklands on Elands River rd, (-CD), Snijman 325 (NBG PRE); flats
between Krakakamma and Van Stadens Mtn, (-CD), Ecklon & Zeyher
99 (5.2) (S); Uitenhage, (-CD), Pappe s.n. (GRA); Addo National Park,
Zuurkop, (-DA), Archibald 3867 (BOL); Botha 5677 (GRA); 2 miles
SW of Addo Drift, (-DB ), Fries, Norlindh & Weimarck 761, 1175 (BOL);
Alexandria, 6.5 miles N of Nanaga shop, (-DB), Acocks & Story 2795
(PRE); near Port Elizabeth golf course, (-DC), Britten 1789 (GRA); 8
miles from Port Elizabeth to Grahamstown, (-DC), Comins 751 (PRE);
Markman Industrial Area. Port Elizabeth, (-DC), Dahlstrand 2835
202
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
(GRA, PRE. STE); Coega, (-DC), Horn D.H.S. (PRE); 26 km from Port
Elizabeth on N2 to Grahamstown, (-DC), Koekemoer 278, 279 (PRE);
24 km from Port Elizabeth, (-DC), Koekemoer 280 (PRE); Parsons Vlei,
(-DC), Long 36 (GRA); Redhouse, (-DC), Long 1062 (GRA); Koega,
Farm Sonop, (-DC), Olivier 708 (NBG), 1582 (PRE); Redhouse, (-DC),
Paterson 478 (GRA); between Port Elizabeth and Grahamstown, (-DC),
Story 2821 (PRE); Port Elizabeth, Kabega Park, (-DC), Olivier 440
(GRA); Port Elizabeth golf course, (-DC), Walters P(l) (NBG); Port
Elizabeth, (-DC), West 167 (GRA); Walmer, (-DC), Ecklon s.n.
(BOL48256, STE); Paterson 1174 (BOL); Port Elizabeth, (-DC),
Drege 149 (PRE); Algoa Bay, (-DD), Zeyher 2921 (P, S, SAM, STE).
3326 (Grahamstown): Alicedale, (-AC), Bavliss BR-404 (PRE);
Hofman’s Bosch, (-AC), Britten 1016, 1137 (GRA); Alexandria, Hillary,
(-AC), Burtt Davy 14245 (BOL); Tsitsikama National Park, (-AC),
Relief 396 (PRE); Highlands road, Farm Atherstone, (-AD), Boucher
2484 (PRE, STE); Highlands road, near railway crossing, (-AD), Brink
213 (GRA, PRE, STE); Alicedale road near Grahamstown, (-AD), Brink
378 (GRA, PRE); Howieson’s Poort, (-AD), Batten s.n. (NBG); Comins
1701 (GRA, NBG, STE), 1707 (GRA); Rennie 327 (BOL); Grahams-
town, (-AD), Guthrie 3310 (NBG); Coldspring, (-AD), Jacot
Guillarmod 8720 (PRE), 9569 (GRA, PRE); Highlands station, (-AD),
Burtt Davy 7951 (BOL, PRE); near Coldstream station, (-AD), Killick
776 (PRE); between Grahamstown and Alexandria, 1 km from Salem,
(-AD), Koekemoer 174 (PRE); Atherstone, (-AD), Koekemoer 277
(PRE); Grahamstown, Frasers Reserve, (-AD), Shumane P28 (GRA);
Salem, (-AD), Zeyher 291 (S, SAM); Albany, (-BC), Erens PRE28359
(PRE); 5 km from Grahamstown on road to Port Alfred, (-BC),
Germishuizen 1511 (PRE); on R67, 13 km from Grahamstown near
Belmont Valley, (-BC), Koekemoer 272 (PRE); Grahamstown near Sett-
lers Monument, (-BC), Koekemoer 273 (PRE); Gunfire Hill, (-BC),
Richardson 21, 27 (GRA); Grahamstown, (-BC), Britten 1939-11
(NBG); Dyer 153 (GRA); MacOwan 1002 (BOL); Marloth 6130 (PRE);
Rogers 27267 (GRA), 27367 (BOL, STE)); Theron 496 (PRE); Tyson
16837 (BOL); Signal Hill (-BC), Levyns 3765 (BOL); Grahamstown
hills, (-BC), Tyson 16837 (SAM); Port Elizabeth, Vaal Vlei Estate,
(-BC), Mogg 4702 (PRE); Bathurst, 8.7 miles WNW of Kleinemonde,
(-BD), Acocks 21820 (BOL, PRE); Round Hill, (-BD), Bolus 4110
(PRE); Bathurst, Farm Hopewell, (-BD), Compton 19839 (NBG); Gra-
hamstown, (-CA), Britten 6559 (PRE); Alexandria Dist., (-CB), De Vos
c-18446 (STE); Alexandria, near station, (-CB), Galpin 10634 (PRE);
Alexandria, Nauaga, (-CB), Bond 1241 (NBG); Alexandria, NE of
Nananga Post Office, (-CB), Acocks 12795 (PRE); Alexandria, (-CB),
Archibald 4381 (GRA); Grahamstown, Barville Park near Kasouga,
(-DA), Bayliss 8582 (GRA); 8 km from Port Alfred at Hayes siding,
(-DB), Relief 299 (PRE); Kowie West, (-DB), Tyson s.n. (BOL13299,
PRE); betw. Grahamstown and Coegha, (-DC), Sidey 1678 (PRE). 3327
(Grahamstown); near Bell, Dist. Peddie, (-AB), Galpin 7688 (GRA);
Grahamstown, near war monument at Kaffirdrift Police Sta., (-AC),
Burrows 2776 (GRA); East London, above Kwani River, (-BA), Comins
1519 (PRE); East London, The Springs, (-BA), Rattray 1370 (BOL).
3418 (Cape Town): Noordhoek Peak, (-AB), Gillett 3568 (PRE); above
Chapmans Peak Drive, (-AB), Whellan 1786 (PRE); Palmiet River
Mouth, (-BD), Boucher 1045 (PRE). 3419 (Caledon): Lebanon Reserve,
Grabouw, (-AA), Verdoucq 87 (STE); Hermanus, Femkloof, (-AD),
Orchard 321 (PRE); Zwarteberg and Klein Rivers Mountain, (-AD),
Ecklon s.n. (S); 2 miles W of Papiesvlei Post Office, (-BC), Acocks 22312
(PRE); Paardeberg Mountain, (-BC), Stokoe 64076 (PRE); The Kelders
(-CB), Van derMerwe 2033 (PRE). 3420 (Swellendam): Bontebok Park,
(-AB), Liebenberg 6751 (PRE, STE), 7179 (PRE); De Hoop, Oulande,
(-AD), Eellingham 874 (PRE); Van Wyk 2179 (PRE); Potberg, (-BC),
Acocks 23011 (PRE); Bredasdorp, Die Poort, (-CA), Compton 22609
(STE). 3421 (Riversdale): Langeberg, above Herbertsdale, (-BB), Muir
1259 (BOL); Skulpiesbaai, (-BC), Van Schalkwyk 84 (PRE). 3422
(Mossel Bay): Goukamma Nature Reserve, (-BB), Heinecken 217
(PRE). 3423 (Knysna): The Heads, (-BB), Phillips 1050 (SAAS);
Tsitsikama Coastal Park, (-BB), Retief 396 (PRE); Plettenberg Bay,
(-AB ), Rogers 22690 (PRE); Ratels Bosch, Tsitsikama, (-BB ), Fourcade
336 (BOL, GRA). 3424 (Humansdorp): E of Witelsbos, (-AA), Hutch-
inson 1418 (K); Humansdorp, (-BB), Burtt Davy 11984 (PRE); Levyns
3788 (BOL); Rogers 2946 (PRE); Cape St Francis, (-BB), Thompson
896 (PRE, STE); Kareedouw Pass, (-BB), Gillett 1373 (STE), 2023 (K);
Humansdorp, Majo, (-BB), Ecklon & Zeyher 51 (4.2) (SAM); Port
Elizabeth, Winterhoek Mtn, (-DC), Fries, Norlindh & Weimarck 1082
(BOL, S); Redhouse, (-DC), Fries, Norlindh & Weimarck 545 (BOL);
Port Elizabeth, (-DC), Fries, Norlindh & Weimarck21 (BOL). 3425 (Port
Elizabeth): Cape Recief, (-BA), Ecklon & Zeyher 113 (93.7) (S).
Sectio 4. Disparago
Capitula heterogamous, 2-flowered; ray flowers sterile;
tubular flowers hermaphrodite, colour of ray and tubular
flowers similar: either white or pink; cypselas reduced in
ray flowers, fertile in tubular flowers. Confined to coastal
flats.
18° 20° 22° 24° 26° 28° 30°
28°
30°
32°
34°
FIGURE 3. — Geographical distribution of D. tortilis.
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
203
6. Disparago anomala Schltr. ex Levyns in Journal
of South African Botany 2: 101 (1936a). Type: Cape,
Worcester, Papiesvlei, Schlechter 10443 (PRE, lecto.!,
here designated; G(2x)!; GRA!; PRE(4x)!, S!).
D. anomala Schltr, in sched.
D. anomala Schltr. ex Bolus & Wolley-Dod: 280 (1904), nom. nud.
The specific name refers to the absence of a pappus.
Shrublets very variable, 80-150 or 300-800 mm tall,
profusely and densely branched and cushion-like or large
open shrubs. Leaves filiform, 3— 7(— 10) x 0.4-0.6 mm, spi-
rally twisted with 1-11/2 twists, mucronate, mucro unob-
trusive or to 0.8 mm long, margins fully involute.
Synflorescence : heads in globose or subglobose aggrega-
tions. Heads 2-flowered or sometimes 1 -flowered, usually
1 ray flower and 1 tubular flower. Involucre in 2 series,
inner series of 3 or 4 bracts, chaffy, 3-5 x 0.4— 0.7 mm,
usually bicoloured, outer series often only partly chaffy.
Ray flowers sterile, 1. 7-2.0 x 1.3-1. 6 mm, usually white
or sometimes pink; cypselas reduced, often not distinct
from corolla. Tubular flowers hermaphrodite, ?lobes ap-
parently not opening in star-like manner; cypselas pentag-
onal, apical annulus usually well developed, surface
puberulous, hairs falcate. Pappus absent.
Distribution : D. anomala occurs on coastal flats in the
southwestern Cape. It is very common in the Peninsula
and spreads northwards to Blackheath and eastwards to
the Breede River (Figure 4). It very often grows on
calcrete ridges or calcareous soils.
Specimens examined
CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): Blackheath, (-DC), Boucher 5083
(STE): Raitt 44 (STE, PRE). 3418 (Simonstown): Peninsula. Witsand,
(-AB), Penfold 228 (NBG); Boon Mountain, (-AB), Pillans 4919 (BOL);
Salter 4277 (K); Klipfontein road, E of Mowbray, (-AB). Salter 280-15
(BOL); Buffels Bay, (-AB), Salter 280-15b (BOL); Rheboks Dam, Good
Hope Nature Reserve, (-AB), Taylor 6732 (PRE); Sirkelsvlei, (-AD),
Compton 19371 (NBG, STE); Bonteberg, (-AD), Compton 10627
(NBG); Buffels Bay, (-AD), Compton 13000 (NBG); Brightwater, (—
AD), Compton 14571 (NBG); slope above Smitswinkel Bay, (-AD),
Esterhuysen 32819 (BOL); Galpin 12785 (PRE); Gillen 1508 (K); Cape
Point, (-AD), Gillett 3474 (STE); Good Hope Nature Reserve. (-AD),
Koekemoer 354 (PRE); Smitswinkel Bay, (-AD), Levyns 4935 (BOL);
Salter 4281 (PRE, K); Buffels Bay, (-AD), Salter 2933, s.n. (BOL); Good
Hope Nature Reserve, near Gifkommetjie turnoff, (-AD), Taylor 6717a
(STE); Smitswinkel Vlei, (-AD), Wolley-Dod 766 (K); Cape Rats, (-
BA), Adamson 4256 (BOL); Cape Flats near beacon FO-ST2, (-BA),
Taylor 3 150 (PRE. STE); near Faure, (-BB), Galpin 12565 (PRE); W of
Faure, (-BB), Salter 4326 (PRE, BOL, K); Die Punt, Pringle Bay, (-BD),
Boucher 1461 (STE, PRE); Caledon, Hanglip, (-BD), Esterhuysen 33494
(BOL); Betty’s Bay, (-BD), Levyns 10072 (BOL); Pringle Bay, (-BD),
Levyns 10847 (BOL); Rooiels, (-BD), Parker 4180 (BOL, NBG). 3419
(Worcester): Houwhoek, (-AA), Bolus s.n. (PRE); Guthrie 3601 (NBG);
Schlechter 7412 (BOL, G. P); S of Caledon, (-AB), Salter 9034 (SAM);
Hawston, (-AC), Leighton 410 (BOL); Onrust River, (-AC), Schlechter
1986 (PRE), 10393 (BOL. G. GRA. PRE, S); border between Wortelgat
and Walker Bay State Forest, (-AD), Bosenberg & Rutherford 226 (STE);
near Shaw’s Mtn, (-AD), Salter 9034 (BOL); Papiesvlei, (-AD/BC),
Schlechter 10443 (G. GRA, PRE); Genadendal, (-BA), Gillett 899
(STE); Flouhoogte, E of Stanford, (-BC), Hugo 1544 (PRE, STE); Die
Skeiding, between Bredasdorp and Elim, (-BC/BD), Fellingham 249
(PRE. STE); Bredasdorp Mountain, (-BD/DB), Galpin 10479 (G, PRE);
Gans Bay, (-CB), Hall 4610 (NBG, PRE); Die Kelders, (-CB),
Koekemoer 347 (PRE); Hagelkraal, (-DA), Barker 5276 (NBG); Comp-
ton 19035 (STE); Hugo 1591 (STE), 1721 (PRE. STE); Lewis 63089
(SAM); Viljoenshof between Elim and Die Dam, (-DA), Koekemoer 348
(PRE); Van Wyk 799 (STE); Groot Hagelkraal, near Pearly Beach. (-DA),
Van Wyk 1146 (PRE, STE); Elim, (-DB). Barker 5288 (NBG); Schlechter
7679 (BOL, G, GRA); Die Poort, between Bredasdorp and Elim, (-DB),
Bolus 20538 (BOL); between Bredasdorp and Elim, (-DB), Gillett 1444
(STE); flats between Bredasdorp and Elim, (-DB). Levyns 4871 (PRE,
BOL); Bredasdorp Forest Reserve, (-DC), Hugo 1643 (PRE, STE); 2 km
from Elim, (-DC), Koekemoer 346 (PRE). 3420 (Bredasdorp): Bontebok
Park, (-AB), Compton 21929, 22630 (NBG); De Hoop, Potberg, (-BC),
Burgers 1759 (PRE, STE), 1815 (PRE); Potberg, Farm Albertsdale. (-
BC), Compton 19531 (NBG); Potberg, (-BC), Koekemoer 182, 183
(PRE); Levyns 8180, 11554 (BOL); Lewis 63082 (SAM); Thompson 3766
(PRE, STE); Bredasdorp, Die Poort, (-CA), Compton 22609 (NBG);
Bredasdorp, (-CA), Levyns 3523 (BOL); between Bredasdorp and Struis
Bay, (-CA), Levyns 3534a (BOL); Bredasdorp, (-CA), Levyns 11547
(BOL); Bredasdorp, Heuningberg Nature Reserve, (-CA), Koekemoer
184 (PRE); Bredasdorp, 1 km from Struis Bay to Elim, (-CC),
Koekemoer 343 (PRE).
7. Disparago ericoides (Berg.) Gaertn., Fructibus
et seminibus plantarum 2: 463 (1791); Fess.: 363 (1832).
Type: ‘e Cap. b. Spei’, Thunberg s.n. (SBT; photocopy
and fragment in PRE!).
Stoebe ericoides Berg.: 339 (1767); Thunb.: 169: (1800);Thunb.: 726
(1823); Spreng.: 442 (1826). Seriphium ericoides (Berg.) Pers.: 500
(1807).
Stoebe torta Spreng.: 442 (1826). Type not seen.
D. lasiocarpa Cass.: 42 (1825); DC.: 258 (1837); Harv.: 278 (1894);
Levyns: 102 (1936a), synon. nov. Type not seen.
Wigandia disparaginoides Less.: 362 (1832). Type not seen.
D. seriphioides DC.: 257 (1837). Type: Burchell 705, not seen.
D. hoffmanniana Schltr.: 203 (1900). Type: in regio austro-oc-
cidentalis, in dictione Caledon, alt. c. 1500 ped., 21 December 1896,
Schlechter 9801 (PRE, lecto.! here designated: BOL!, GRA!).
Because of the nature and uniqueness of the cypselas
of this species it is very easy to identify, even from a
description. A fragment of the type specimen in the
Bergius Herbarium and a drawing by Mr Ears Kers con-
firmed that this name was misapplied to D. tortilis for
many years.
Small compact or larger open shrubs, 100-300(-800)
mm tall, profusely branched. Leaves filiform, 2-8 x 0.3-
0.6 mm, spirally twisted with 1—1 twists, usually
spreading but often appressed especially near inflores-
cence, mucronate, margins involute with margins touch-
ing. Synflorescences variable in robustness, number of
heads and degree of aggregation. Heads with 1 ray and
1 tubular flower; flowers strongly honey-scented. Involu-
cre of 4—6 bracts, in 2 series; bracts in inner series nar-
rowly cymbiform, acute, yellowish with reddish tinge near
apex; outer series protected by 4—6 spathulate, foliaceous
bracts. Ray flowers sterile, ray 2.5-3. 5(-4.0) x 1. 5-2.0
mm, in shades of pink, or white; cypselas reduced. Tubu-
lar flowers hermaphrodite; cypselas woolly, apical annu-
lus a loose arrangement of hairs. Pappus of 15-20
plumose hairs, connate at base.
Distribution : from Cape Point northwards to Malmes-
bury, De Dooms and Montagu and eastwards to Potberg.
It was also collected at Ystervark Point and Plettenberg
Bay. The distribution is disjunct with gaps between Hei-
delberg and Riversdale and between Mossel Bay and
Knysna (Figure 5).
204
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
FIGURE 4. — Geographical distribution of D. anomala.
Specimens examined
CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): Springfontein, (-CB), Axelson 376
(NBG); Bokke River, (-CB), Hugo 974 (PRE, STE); near Melkbosch,
(-CB), Wasserlau 775 (NBG); Kenilworth, (-CD), Bolus 3297 (PRE);
Flanagan 2448 (PRE); top of Table Mountain, (-CD), Schonberg 4888
(PRE); S of Koeberg, (-CD), Pillans 6793 (BOL), s.n. (GRA); Farm
Burgers Post, near Pella, (-DA), Boucher & Shepherd 4923 (PRE, STE);
Koeberg, (-DA), Goldblatt 5313 (PRE); between Cape Town and
Malmesbury, (-DA), Montgomery 382 (STE); Kraaifontein, (-DC), Low
794 (STE); Stellenbosch, (-DD). Drege s.n. (PRE-12826). 3319 (Worces-
ter): Waterval, Tulbagh, (-AC), Drege s.n. (GRA); De Dooms, Groot
Kloof, (-BC), Stokoe 63085 (PRE); Matroosberg, N slope, (-BC), Es-
terhuysen 18713 (BOL); between Worcester and Rawsonville, (-CB),
Esterhuysen 19677 (PRE, NBG); near Edelweiss garage, Breede River,
(-CB), Walters 2394 (SAAS); Franshoek, Zachariashoek Catchment,
(-CC), Kruger 887 (STE); La Motte Forest Station, Zachariashoek, (-
CC), Vtviers 104 (STE); Franshoek Pass, (-CC), Compton 12966 (NBG);
Franshoek Pass, near Catspad memorial needle, (-CC), Koekemoer 352
(PRE); Audensberg, (-CD), Esterhuysen 28185 (BOL, PRE); Blaaskloof,
W slope of Keeromsberg, (-DA), Esterhuysen 27583 (?BOL); Jonaskop,
(-DC), Boucher 4244 (STE). 3320 (Montagu): Pypsteelfontein,
Waboomsberg, (-CA), Moffett & Steensma 4118 (STE); between
Swellendam and Barrydale, (-CC), Marsh 1135 (PRE, STE). 3418 (Cape
Town): near Muizenberg, (-AB), Bolus 3297 (GRA); Peninsula, near
Kommetjie, (-AB), Galpin 12783 (PRE); Noordhoek Mountain, (-AB),
Gillett 3568 (STE); Simonstown, top of Redhill near Pinehaven, (-AB),
Koekemoer 353 (PRE); S slopes of Chapmans Peak, (-AB). Pillans 3027
(PRE); Simonstown, Farm Bergvliet, (-AB), Purchell 90475 (BOL);
Good Hope Nature Reserve, Olifantbos road near Klein Rondevlei, (-
AB), Taylor 7632 (PRE, STE); Good Hope Nature Reserve, (-AB ), Rodin
3304 (PRE); Kommetjie, (-AB), Penfold 237 (BOL); Smitswinkel. (-
AD), Galpin 12782 (PRE); Red Hill, '(-AD), Taylor 5686 (PRE, STE);
near Platboom Street, Southern hills. Plot 33, (-AD), Taylor 6652 (PRE;
STE); Helderberg, (-BB), Galpin 12308 (PRE); Palmiet River Mouth,
(-BB), Levyns 3337 (BOL); Steenbras Valley, (-BB), Stokoe 2568 (PRE);
Cape Flats, (-BC), Ecklon 1841 (S); near Palmiet River Mouth, (-BD),
Boucher 1045 (STE); Betty’s Bay, (-BD). Boucher 1446 (PRE, STE);
Kogelberg, (-BD), Boucher 1780 (PRE, STE); Hangklip, (-BD), Comp-
ton 6071 (NBG); Rooiels, (-BD), Koekemoer 351 (PRE); Palmiet River
Valley, (-BD), Stokoe 8718 (PRE); Palmiet River, J-BD), Stokoe 58132
(PRE. BOL); Kogelberg Reserve, (-BD), Van Wilgen 108 (PRE, STE).
3419 (Caledon): Viljoen’s Pass, (-AA), Rodin 3099 (PRE); top of
Viljoen’s Pass, (-AA), Stokoe 65913 (PRE); Caledon (-AB), Bolus 9172
(PRE); Hermanus, (-AC), Compton 23223 (NBG); Kleinmond, (-AC),
De Vos 541 (STE); Onrust River Mountain, (-AC), Esterhuysen 4916
(NBG, PRE); Botrivier, Kleinmond, (-AC), Taylor 3785 (NBG); Tulbach
waterfall, (-AC), Ecklon 51 ( 1.11 ) (SAM-38472); Hermanus golf course,
(-AC), Walters 55 (PRE); Onrust River, (-AD), Compton 4916 (NBG);
Hermanus, (-AD), De Beer 23224 (PRE); Babylons Tower, (-AD), Es-
terhuysen 1941 (BOL); Hermanus, flats near Klein River, (-AD), Galpin
12764 (PRE); Shaw’s Mountain Pass, (-AD), Hafstrom & Acocks 2251
(PRE); Femkloof Nature Reserve, (-AD), Orchard 537 (PRE, STE); 1
km from Caledon on Shaw’s Pass, (-AD), Stirton 11103 (STE); Klein
River Mountain, (-AD), Stokoe 68737 (BOL, PRE); Genadendal, near
mission station, (-BA), Le\yns 4847 (PRE); Genadendal Mountains,
(-BA), Schlechter 9801 (BOL, GRA, PRE); Zondagskloof, (-BC),
Compton 10228 (NBG); Hartebees River, (-BC), Elbrecht 22151 (PRE);
Bredasdorp, (-BD), Barker 7259 (GRA, NBG); Paardenberg, (-BD),
Jordaan c!8458 (STE); The Kelders, (-CB), Van derMerwe 2033 (STE);
Danger Point, (-CB), Leighton 1560 (PRE); Danger Point, (-CB), Comp-
ton 10262 (NBG); Baardscheerdersbosch, (-DA), Compton 20454
(NBG); Elitn, (-DA), Drake 9643\ Schlechter 3515. 9643 (PRE);
Blaaskloof. Keeromsberg, (-DA), Esterhuysen 27583 (PRE); 1 km from
Viljoenshof between Elim and Die Dam, (-DA), Koekemoer 349 (PRE);
Ratel River, (-DA), Lewis 5250 (NBG); Hagel Kraal. (-DA), Lewis
63088 (BOL); between Pearly Beach and Viljoenshof, (-DA), Simpson
213 (STE); Uintjieskuil, (-DB), Van Breda & Admiraal 2353 (PRE); 3
km from Die Dam to Elim, (-DC), Koekemoer 344 (PRE). 3420
( Riversdale ): Bontebok National Park, (-AB), Grobler 592 (PRE, STE);
Koekemoer 308, 339 (PRE); Liebenberg 7970 (PRE); De Hoop, (-AD),
Van der Merwe 1362 (PRE, STE); Potberg, above Diepkloof, (-BC),
Burgers 1640b (STE); Potberg, (-BC), Taylor 4337 (PRE); Bredasdorp.
(-CA), Hafstrom & Acocks 2250 (PRE). 3421 (Riversdale): Still Bay,
(-AD), Muir 439 (PRE); Ystervarkpunt, Kampong entrance, N block,
(-BC). Willems 109 (STE).
8. Disparago kraussii Sch. Bip. in Flora 2: 693
(1844); Harv.: 278 (1894); Levyns: 100 (1936a). Type:
Cape Province, near Tsitsikama, Krauss s.n. (P-CO, spec-
imen on the far left, lecto.!, here designated).
The type, Krauss s.n., is mounted with two other speci-
mens on the same sheet in the Cosson Herbarium. The
specimen of Drege in the centre is D. laxifolia , whereas
the two others are of D. kraussii. The specimen on the
left is chosen as lectotype because the original label of
Krauss is mounted with it. All three specimens are pro-
vided with notes in Schultz Bipontinus’s handwriting.
Small shrublets, often profusely branched and dwarfed,
1 5 0—5 00 ( —800 ) mm tall. Leaves linear, 4—8 x 0.3-0.5 mm,
spirally twisted, appressed or slightly spreading, margins
involute and almost touching, mucronate at apex. Syn-
florescence globular or ovate aggregation of heads. Heads
with 1 ray and 1 tubular flower. Involucre of about 6
bracts in 1 or 2 series; narrowly cymbiform, smooth, yel-
lowish. Ray flowers sterile, ray 1. 8-2.2 x 0.7-1. 5 mm,
usually white or sometimes pink; cypselas reduced. Tu-
bular flowers hermaphrodite; cypselas puberulous, hairs
falcate, more prominent on ribs, apical annulus well de-
veloped. Pappus present in tubular flowers, of (3— )5(— 8)
plumose hairs, not coalescent; occasionally poorly devel-
FIGURE 5. — Geographical distribution of D. ericoides.
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
205
oped and then only 1 or 2 hairs per flower and lacking
in some heads.
In Taylor 7720 a pappus, identical to that in the tubular
flowers, was present in the sterile ray flowers, whereas in
Compton 23519 , reduced stamens were present in the ster-
ile ray flowers.
Distribution : D. kraussii can be found along the south-
ern coast of the Cape from De Hoop Nature Reserve to
Still Bay (Figure 2).
Specimens examined
CAPE. — 3420 (Riversdale): De Hoop, (-AD), Barker 8743 (NBG);
Burgers 162 (PRE, STE); Van der Merwe 1181 (PRE); Die Poort,
Bredasdorp, (-AD), Compton 22609 (STE); De Hoop game camp, (—
AD), Van der Merwe 1112 (PRE); De Hoop, calcrete ridges, (-AD),
Barker 8693 (NBG); Heidelberg, Witsand, (-BB), Lexyns 10729 (BOL);
De Hoop, Farm Hamerkop, (-BC), Van Wyk 1605, 2311, 2315 (PRE);
Whitesands, (-BD), Esterhuysen 16963 (BOL); De Hoop, Witwater, (—
BD), Van Wyk 2293 (PRE); Farm Meulvlei, (-CA). Bosenberg & Ruther-
ford 272 (STE); Albertinia, (-CA), Compton 23519 (NBG); Uyshoek, 7
km N of Amiston, (-CA), Hugo 843 (PRE, STE); Bredasdorp, (-CA), Dix
41927 (SAM); Bredasdorp, Skipskop, (-CB), Acocks 22258 (PRE);
Moerasfontein, between Bredasdorp and Skipskop, (-CB). Hugo 848
(PRE, STE); De Hoop, between Buffelsfontein and Ryspunt, (-CB), Van
Wyk 2217 (PRE); flats between Bredasdorp and Struis Bay, (-CC), Levyns
3534 (BOL). 3421 (Riversdale): Plattebosch, (-AA), Muir 438(5217)
(PRE); between Riversdale and Albertinia, (-AB), Compton 23327
(NBG); Puntjie along Riversdale coast, (-AB), Esterhuysen 16976
(BOL); Still Bay, Panorama circle, (-AD), Bohnen 3823 (STE), 5122
(PRE, STE); Still Bay Reserve, (-AD), Fellingham 464 (PRE. STE);
above bridge at Still Bay strand, (-AD), Nordenstam 402 (S);
Schoemanshoek between Albertinia and The Fisheries, (-BA), Boucher
3717 (PRE, STE); Albertinia Downs, (-BA), Muir 1975 (PRE); near
Albertinia, (-BA), Muir 1978 (PRE); Cloetes Pass, Herbertsdale, (-BB),
Zinn 54598 (PRE); 'Cancase leegte', S of Albertinia, (-BC), Oliver 5722
(STE); Gouriqua, Ystervarkpunt, (-BC), Willemse 110 (STE);
Ystervarkpunt, Aulax Hill, (-BD), Willemse 162 (STE). 3422 (Mossel
Bay): Cloete's Pass, (-AA), Lewis 5406 (NBG); hill 2.5 km W of Mossel
Bay near reservoir, (-AA), Vlok 1423 (STE); George, Gwaing River,
(-AB), O’Callagan, Fellingham & Van Wyk 226 (STE); George, Chris-
tina Bay, (-BA), Schlechter 2449 (BOL, G, K, PRE, S, STE); Knysna,
Buffels Bay, (-BB), Keet 960 (PRE); Sedgefteld, (-BB), O'Callagan 576
(STE). 3423 (Knysna): Lake Pleasant Hotel, (-AA). Acocks 21221
(PRE); Groenvlei, (-AA), Levyns 10310 (BOL); Robberg Nature Re-
serve, highest point, (-AB ), Taylor 7720 (STE); Robberg Nature Reserve,
top of central dune, (-AB), Taylor 7720a (STE); Plettenberg Bay,
Robberg, (-AB), Vdjoen 62 (PRE).
9. Disparago laxifolia DC., Prodromus systematis
naturalis regni vegetabilis 6: 257 (1837); Harv.: 278
(1894); Levyns: 101 (1936a). Type: ‘ad Cap. Bonae-Spei
in distr. Caledon ad Zwartberg et Kleinrivier’s-berge',
Ecklon s.n. (G-DC in herb. Dunant, holotype; photo and
microfiche in PRE!).
Small trailing shrublets, 100-300 mm tall, branches
usually lax and far apart. Leaves linear, 3— 8(— 10) x 0.6-
2.5 mm, widely spaced, spirally twisted, usually with Vl-l
twist, spreading, older leaves reflexed; margins slightly
involute, apices blunt. Synflorescence globular aggrega-
tion of heads. Heads with 1 ray and 1 tubular flower (a
single case with 2 ray flowers was observed). Involucre
of about 6 bracts in 2 series, inner series chaffy, narrowly
cymbiform, outer series foliaceous, spathulate. Ray flow-
ers sterile, ray 1.5-2.0 x 1.0-1. 5 mm, white; cypselas re-
duced. Tubular flowers hermaphrodite; cypsela surface
puberulous, apical annulus a well-developed fringe of
hairs. Pappus present in tubular flowers, of 5 plumose
hairs, not connate.
Distribution : D. laxifolia has a very local and scattered
distribution that stretches from Simonstown to the
Houwhoek Mountains, Grabouw, Caledon and Hermanus.
It is very common in the Femkloof Nature Reserve, near
Hermanus (Figure 2).
Specimens examined
CAPE. — 3418 (Simonstown): Redhill, (-AB), Levyns 5903 (BOL);
Salter 5703 (BOL, K); Peninsula, Sirkelsvlei, (-AD), Esterhuysen 7793
(BOL); Sir Lowry's Pass (-BB), Drege s.n. (P); Schlechter 595 (PRE),
7223 (BOL, GRA. S); Steenbras area, (-BB), Levyns 8753 (BOL); Sir
Lowry's Pass, Palmiet River, (-BB), Penther 1415 (S): Cape Point Gap,
Klawer Valley, (-BB), Salter 6426 (BOL, K); near Somersfontein, (-BD),
Boucher 720 (PRE, STE); Betty’s Bay, (-BD), Esterhuysen 34768
(BOL). 3419 (Caledon): Grabouw, Palmiet River, (-AA), Bolus 5077
(BOL); Bond 1531 (NBG); Esterhuysen 35273 (BOL); Levyns 5358,
7778 (BOL); Stokoe 63084 (SAM); Palmiet River Valley, Platteberg,
(-AA), Stokoe 65911 (SAM); Houwhoek, (-AA), Esterhuysen 33688
(BOL); Galpin 4152 (GRA. PRE); Levyns 11404 (BOL); Schlechter 5447
(BOL, G, GRA, K, PRE, S), 5506 (GRA, PRE); Good Hope Reserve.
(-AB), Wright s.n. (K); Palmietberg, E of bridge, (-AC), De Vos 1431
(PRE. STE); Hermanus, Vogelgat Reserve, (-AC), Esterhuysen 35540
(BOL); Hermanus, Femkloof Nature Reserve, (-AC). Koekemoer 192
(PRE); Palmiet River mouth, (-AC), Koekemoer 439 (PRE); Femkloof
Nature Reserve, (-AD). Orcltard 321 (STE); Vogelgat, Sea Saddle, (—
AD), Wdliams 2909 (NBG): Caledon, Highlands, (-DB ), Compton 12259
(NBG); Highlands Estate, Elgin, (-DB), Lewis 63083 (SAM).
Excluded species
Disparago gomphrenoides Sch. Bip.: 180 (1861). Type:
C.B.S., Zeyher 46 (P!) = Stoebe sp.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I wish to thank the following: all the curators of herba-
ria who sent specimens on loan; the NBI, my employers
for creating opportunities for research and for financial
support; my colleagues, for advice and moral support; A.
Romanowski, for the developing and printing of photo-
graphs; Dr S.M. Perold for assistance with the SEM; li-
brary staff for handling numerous requests. Dr O.A.
Leistner for translating the diagnoses; E. du Plessis for
proofreading the manuscript; Prof. B-E. van Wyk, for su-
pervising my M.Sc. thesis on Disparago.
REFERENCES
BENTHAM, G. 1873. Compositae. In G. Bentham & J.D. Hooker,
Genera plantarum 2: 163-533. Reeve, London.
BERGIUS, PJ. 1767. Descriptiones plantarum ex capite bonae spec.
399-440. Salvius, Stockholm.
BOLUS, H. 1909. Contributions to the African Flora. Transactions of
the South African Philosophical Society 18: 378^-00.
BOLUS, H. & WOLLEY-DOD, A. 1 904. A list of flowering plants and
ferns of the Cape Peninsula, with notes on some of the critical
species. Transactions of the South African Philosophical Soci-
ety 14: 207-280.
CASSINI, A.H.G. 1819. Dictionaire des sciences naturelles 13: 348.
349.
CASSINI, A.H.G. 1 825. Dictionaire des sciences naturelles 34: 42, 43.
DE CANDOLLE, A.P. 1837. Prodromus systematis naturalis regni
vegetabilis 6: 257, 258. Treuttel & Wiirtz, Paris.
DYER, R.A. 1951. Disparago ericoides. The Flowering Plants of
Africa 28: t. 1102. Government Printer, Pretoria.
DYER, R.A. 1975. The genera of southern African flowering plants.
Government Printer, Pretoria.
GAERTNER. J. 1791 . Fructibus et seminibus plantarum 2: 463, t. 173.
Schramm, Tubingen.
206
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
HARVEY, W.H. 1894. Compositae. In W.H. Harvey & O.W. Sonder,
Flora capensis 3: 277 , 278. Hodges, Smith, Dublin.
HUTCHINSON, J. 1932. Notes on the flora of southern Africa: III.
Miscellaneous new species. Kew Bulletin 10: 465-512.
KOEKEMOER, M. 1991. New species in the genus Disparago.
Bothalia 21: 158-161 .
KOEKEMOER, M. in prep. a. Generic and infrageneric relationships
in the genus Disparago (Asteraceae). South African Journal of
Botany.
KOEKEMOER, M. in prep. b. Speciation and biogeography in the
genus Disparago (Asteraceae) — with reference to the distribu-
tion of related genera. South African Journal of Botany.
LESSING, C. F. 1832. Synopsis generum compositarum'. 362, 363.
Black, Young & Young, London.
LEVYNS, M.R. 1936a. A revision of Disparago Gaertn. Journal of
South African Botany 2: 95-103.
LEVYNS, M.R. 1936b. Notes on some members of Compositae.
Transactions of the Royal Society of Southern Africa 23: 91-95.
NECKER, N.J. DE 1790. Elementa botanica. Societatem Typo-
graphicam, Neuwied.
PERSOON, C.H. 1807. Synopsis plantarum : 500. Treuttel & Wiirtz,
Tubingen.
RICKETT, H.W. & STAFLEU, F.A. 1960. Nomina generica con-
servanda et rejicienda spermatophytorum 6. Taxon 9: 153-161.
SCHLECHTER, R. 1900. Plantae Schlechterianae novae vel minus
cognitae describuntur. II. Botanische Jahrbiicher 27: 203, 204.
SCHULTZ BIPONTINUS, C.H. 1844. Enumeratio Compositarum.
Flora 2: 692, 693.
SCHULTZ BIPONTINUS, C.H. 1861. Cassiniaceae uniflorae. Jahres-
bericht der Pollichia 18/19: 24(180), 25(181).
SPRENGEL, K.P.J. 1826. Systema vegetabilium 3: 442.
THUNBERG, C.P. 1800. Prodromus plantarum capensium: 169.
Edman, Uppsala.
THUNBERG, C.P. 1823. Flora capensis'. 726. Stuttgart.
Bothalia 23,2: 207-214(1993)
Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from southern Africa. 2. The genus
Athalamia and A. spathysii ; the genus Oxymitra and O. cristata
S.M. PEROLD*
Keywords: Athalamia, A. spathysii , Cleveaceae, Hepaticae, Marchantiales, Oxymitra, O. cristata, Oxymitraceae, southern Africa, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
The genera Atltalamia (Cleveaceae) and Oxymitra (Oxymitraceae), each respectively represented in southern Africa by a
single species, A. spathysii (Lindenb.) Hattori and O. cristata Garside ex Perold, are discussed.
UITTREKSEL
Die genusse Athalamia (Cleveaceae) en Oxymitra (Oxymitraceae), wat in Suider-Afrika elk respektiewelik verteenwoordig
word deur 'n enkele spesie, A. spathysii (Lindenb.) Hattori en O. cristata Garside ex Perold, word bespreek.
ATHALAMIA
Athalamia Falconer in Annals and Magazine of
Natural History, Ser. 2,1: 375 (1848); ibid.: 397 (1851);
Shimizu & Hattori: 52 (1954); S. Amell: 57 ( 1963). Type
species: Athalamia pinguis Falconer.
Clevea Lindb. 9: 289 (1868); Steph.: 769 (1898);
Schiffn.: 29 (1893); Howe: 36 (1899); K. Mull.: 368
(1951-1958); Hassel de Menendez: 133 (1963). Type spe-
cies: Clevea hyalina (Sommerf.) Lindb.
Spathysia Nees ex Trevis.: 439 (1877). Type species:
Spathysia lindenbergii Trevis. nom. illeg.
Gollaniella Steph.: 74 (1905). Type species: Golla-
niella pusilla Steph.
Thallus medium-sized, medianly concave, bright green,
in crowded patches; on soil in rocky clefts or under over-
hangs. Branches simple or once pseudodichotomously fur-
cate; thickened over midrib, thinning toward undulate,
attenuate margins; apex hardly notched, dorsally not
grooved. Dorsal epidermis hyaline, cell walls sometimes
thickened at comers. Air pores simple, small, slightly ele-
vated, stellate or hardly so, surrounded by a ring of cells,
the radial walls generally thickened, leading below into
individual empty air chambers, these in one or several
layers, bounding walls chlorophyllose, rarely with smaller
cells containing a single, large oil body; storage tissue
with rounded cells fairly closely packed together. Rhizoids
both smooth and pegged. Scales hyaline or purple red, in
2 or more forwardly directed ventral rows, extending be-
yond thallus margins or not, obtusely triangular, append-
age long-acuminate.
Monoicous. Antheridia embedded in slightly raised
central cushion, or all along midline, opening into pro-
jecting, conical papillae. Archegoniophores dorsal, single
^National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001.
MS. received: 1992-06-03.
to several along midline, on short unfurrowed stalk, fili-
form scales at its top, involucres 1 — 3, basally connate,
each with single, obliquely erect capsule, wall dehiscing
by irregular valves, cells with thickening bands. Spores
rounded distally, somewhat flattened proximally, lacking
triradiate mark, densely covered with conical spines. El-
aters long, tapering, bispiral.
Athalamia spathysii (Lindenb.) Hattori in Shimizu
& Hattori in Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory
12: 54 (1954); S. Amell: 57 (1963); Vanden Berghen: 168
(1965); Volk: 230 (1979). Type: Greece, Corfu, leg.
Spathys (W, holo.!; STR, iso.).
Marchantia spathysii Lindenb.: 104 (1829); Bisch.: 1018 (1835).
Dumortiera spathysii (Lindenb.) Nees: 171 (1838); Gott. et al.\ 546
(1846). Clevea spathysii (Lindenb.) K. Mull.: 75 (1940); K. Miill.: 374
(1951-1958).
Plagiochasma rousselianum Mont.: 334 (1838). Clevea rousseliana
(Mont.) Leitgeb in Steph.: 771 (1898). Type: Algeria. 'Boudjareah’,
Roussel.
Thallus medium-sized, slightly concave along middle,
oblong to broadly ovate or obovate (Figure 1A), bright
green, sometimes purple along margins, polygonal out-
lines of subdorsal air chambers clearly visible from above,
i.e. reticulate dorsally, central areolae at apex small, en-
larging toward margins and then in parallel, radiating
rows; air pores tiny, slightly raised, singly placed over
each polygonal area, wet; thallus margins clasped together,
revealing deep purple, transversely wrinkled underside of
wings, dry; in rather crowded patches, simple or once
pseudodichotomously furcate. Branches (3.5-) 5.0-12.0 x
2.5-1. 5 mm, 825-1075 pm thick over midrib, laterally
thinning out into attenuate wings; apex slightly notched
and dorsally not grooved, with tips of 2 or 3 purple-red
ventral scales recurving over edge; margins acute, thin,
scalloped, undulate, often somewhat erect, older parts
dead, ventrally purple; flanks sloping obliquely; ventral
face medianly keeled, green, midrib with row of purple-
red scales on either side (Figure 1C).
208
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
FIGURE 1. — Athalamia spathysii. Thalli. A, dorsal view of thallus with stalked archegoniophore and several young sessile ones; inset with
archegoniophore and 2 dehiscing sporangia; B, dorsal view of thallus with rows of antheridia; C, ventral view of thallus; D, transveise section
of thallus; E, F, dorsal air pores, with thickened radial walls; G, transverse section of air pore; H, ventral scale; I, transverse section of stalk;
J, scale from top of stalk; K capsule wall with cells containing annular thickenings; L, transverse section of capsule wall. A, I-L, Volk 00589\
B Volk 61 24\ C-H, Volk 00904. Scale bars: A-C, 2 mm; D, 1 mm; E-G, K, L = 50 pm; H, J = 200 pm; I = 100 pm. Illustration by A. Pienaar.
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
209
Dorsal epidermal cells unistratose, hyaline, polygonal
or isodiametric, (32.5-)57.5-62.5 x 30.0-42.5 pm, thin-
walled, but frequently thickened at comers, in transverse
section 40 pm thick; air pores very slightly raised (Figure
1G), simple, small, 7.5-12.5 pm wide, 65-150 pm distant
from each other and usually bounded by innermost hyaline
circle (Figure IF), the remains of a collapsed cell ring,
otherwise surrounded by a ring of 4 — 6(— 7) bluntly trian-
gular cells, 15.0 x 22.5-32.0 pm, the radial walls mostly
thickened and pores thus stellate (Figure IE, IF), partly
overlying adjacent dorsal cells. Assimilation tissue 350-
500 pm thick with air chambers empty, in one layer or
sometimes in several layers, 50-95 pm wide, vertical or
sloping forward, oblique laterally (Figure ID), unistratose
walls consisting of chlorophyllose cells, roundish or oval,
40.0-62.5 x 45.0 pm; storage tissue ± 600 pm thick, cells
fairly densely packed together, rounded, up to 62.5 pm
wide; rhizoids mostly smooth, 25-35 pm wide. Scales
purple-red, arranged in 2 forwardly directed ventral rows,
one on either side of midrib, not or somewhat extending
beyond margins of thallus, recurved at apex, obtusely tri-
angular (Figure 1H), margins entire or sometimes slightly
dentate on oblique side of base, not constricted where
joined with acuminate, apically pointed and tapering ap-
pendage, total length (including 750 pm appendage) ±
1300 pm, width at base up to 1000 pm, cells (4-)5- or
6-sided, 90-137 x 40-50 pm; oil bodies absent.
Monoicous, but occasionally only antheridia or arche-
gonia found. Antheridia , when present with archegonia in
a group, proximal to archegoniophore, embedded in cen-
tral, slightly raised, ill-defined cushion lacking scales, oth-
erwise in rows along entire middle of thallus (Figure IB),
sunken, saccate, 500 x 230 pm, narrowed at neck, opening
into raised, conical papillae projecting 200 pm above sur-
face and 300 pm wide at base. Archegoniophores single
or several, linearly and acropetally arranged on dorsal
face, when young sessile, rounded, and basally surrounded
by inconspicuous, filiform scales, air pores and air cham-
bers lacking; stalk cylindrical, pellucid, eventually 1 .6-7.0
mm long, round to ovate in cross section (Figure II). di-
ameter 250 pm, without rhizoidal furrow; scales eventu-
ally carried upwards and then only present at top of stalk,
where joined to archegoniophore, hyaline or pink, basally
750 x 500 pm, with 4 or 5 filiform, apical strands (Figure
1 J), up to 750 pm long, cells 75 x 48 pm; archegoniophore
white to greenish white, central disc absent, with 1-3 in-
volucres, connate at their bases and attached to top of
stalk, bilabiate by vertical cleft, each with single capsule,
brown, globular, 1250 pm in diameter, borne obliquely
erect on 850 x 600 pm seta with bulbous foot, dehiscing
by several irregular valves, wall unistratose (Figure 1L),
cells spindle-shaped, up to 75 x 30 pm, with annular or
spiral thickening bands (Figure IK). Spores (60— )65— 75(—
78) pm in diameter, globular, with distal face convex (Fig-
ure 2A, B), no triradiate mark on somewhat flatter
proximal face, golden brown, semitransparent, thickly
covered with dense conical spines (Figure 2A-D), 5 pm
high and 15 pm wide at base, sprinkled with fine granules
(Figure 2E). Elaters yellow-brown, slightly tapering to-
ward ends, 275-350 pm long, 7.5-10.5 pm wide in mid-
dle, bispiral (Figure 2F), very occasionally branched,
sometimes bent. Chromosome number: n = 9 (Bomefeld
1987); as Clevea rousseliana: n = 9 (Heitz 1927).
DISCUSSION
Athalamia spathysii is rarely collected in southern Afri-
ca, the gatherings by Volk ( 1979) being restricted to Nami-
bia (Figure 3). It grows in periodically dry areas, on soil
overlying slate, granite or sandstone, in rocky crevices or
under overhangs, where runoff may be concentrated and
some protection against radiation is afforded; sometimes
it occurs together with Plagiochasma spp., Targionia
FIGURE 2. — Athalamia spathysii. SEM micrographs of spores. A, B. distal face; C, side view of distal face; D, side view of both faces; E, spinous
processes much enlarged; F, elater. A-F, Volk 00589. A-D, x 580; F. x 1000.
210
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
FIGURE 3. — Distribution of Athalamia spathysii, •; and Oxymitra
cristata , ♦ in southern Africa.
hypophylla etc., but is distinguished from them by the
reticulate dorsal surface, small and slightly raised, mostly
stellate air pores, empty air chambers, scales with acumi-
nate appendages, cells of the capsule wall with spiral
thickenings and by bluntly spinous spores.
It has also been reported from further north in Africa,
i.e. fromTanzania (= Tanganyika) by Vanden Berghen
(1965). Athalamia spathysii is furthermore known from
Israel, North Africa, the Canary Islands and the Mediter-
ranean countries (Muller 1951-1958), the type specimen
having been collected at Corfu. Frey & Kiirschner (1988)
report it from Yemen and Oman in the Arabian Peninsula,
and state that its distribution includes Turkey and Jordan.
Athalamia is classified in the family Cleveaceae Cav-
ers, together with the genera Peltolepis Lindb. and Saute-
ria Nees, but neither of the latter two occur in southern
Africa.
There are at least 10 species world-wide in the genus
Athalamia, with A. spathysii the only representative in
southern Africa, A. pulcherrima (Steph.) Hatt. being from
Ethiopia and distinguished by larger, hyaline ventral scales
and cells with much thickened radial walls surrounding
the dorsal air pores. Another species recorded from Africa,
in Algeria, is Clevea (Athalamia) trabutiana Steph., but
it is regarded by Grolle (1976) as conspecific with A.
hyalina (Sommerf.) Hatt. In A. spathysii the radial walls
of the pore cells are only somewhat thickened, a possible
response to growing in sunlight, as was found in cultiva-
tion studies by Muller (1951-1958). Shimizu & Hattori
(1954), however, reported for this genus, that they had
observed pores with both thickened radial walls (stellate)
or with thin walls (not stellate) on the same plant!
According to Muller (1939), Arnell (1963), Vanden
Berghen (1968) and Volk (1979) oil bodies are absent in
the genus Athalamia. I also found them to be absent in
A. spathysii , but fresh material was not available for study.
Shimizu & Hattori (1954), however, reported oil cells in
Athalamia glauco-virens as well as in A. nana (Shimizu
& Hattori 1955). Schuster (1992) states that sparse, scat-
tered oil cells may be present or absent.
Asexual reproduction is said to be absent. Stephani
(1895) suspected that adventitious growth in the form of
ventral shoots from the costa was partly the reason for
the ‘dichten verfilzten niedrigen Rasen’ in Clevea pul-
cherrima Steph. As in Plagiochasma spp., the apical part
of the thallus continues to grow and increase in length,
beyond the archegoniophore after the latter has differen-
tiated.
Kashyap (1915) described a mycorrhizal region in the
midrib of A. pinguis, the hyphae having penetrated the
thallus via the rhizoids. Sterile specimens of A. spathysii
have been confused with Asterella muscicola (Arnell
1957), because of the stellate dorsal pores, but the latter
does not grow in Namibia (Volk 1979), its ventral scales
have scattered oil bodies, the stalk has a rhizoidal furrow
and the capsule wall lacks thickenings.
Specimens examined
NAMIBIA. — 2217 (Windhoek): WIN 63 (Neudamm), schattige
Glimmerschieferfelsen am Rivier, (-AD), Volk 00952 (BOL; PRE); un-
terhalb Briicke, Glimmerschiefer, (-AD), Volk 86-877 (Herb. Volk); 1
mile west of Windhoek, (-CA), Schelpe 4763 (BOL); WIN 62,
Hatsamas/Dordabis, Kalkfels, (-DC), Volk 00589 p.p. (Herb. Volk). 2218
(Gobabis): WIN 70, schattiges Talchen an den Gobabisstrasse,
Glimmerschiefer, (-??), Volk 00904 (BOL; PRE). 2316 (Nauchas): WIN
39 (Mahonda), schattige Uberhange, Glimmerschiefer, (-BA), Volk 6124
(PRE).
OXYMITRA
Oxymitra Bisch. ex Lindenb., Synopsis hepati-
carum europaearum: 124 (1829); Gott., Lindenb. & Nees:
597 (1846); Frye & Clark: 40 (1937); K. Mull.: 410
(1951-1958); Hassel de Menendez: 200 (1963); Arnell:
11 (1963). Lectotype species: O. incrassata (Brotero)
Sergio & Sim-Sim.
Pycnoscenus Lindb.: 606 (1863), nom. illeg.
Tessellina Dumort.: 164 (1874), non Dumort.: 78
(1822) orth. var.: Tesselina Dumort. mut., Schiffn.: 15
(1893). Type species: Tessellina coriandrina (Spreng.)
Dumort.
Thallus medium-sized, deeply and sharply grooved
dorsally, pale green to deep green, in gregarious or ro-
sette-like stands; rare, on soil, sometimes derived from
ironstone. Branches broadly ovate or oblong, pseudo-
dichotomously furcate; thickened over midrib, thinning to-
ward margins; apex emarginate. Dorsal epidermis hyaline,
persistent. Air pores tiny, simple, radial walls thickened,
stellate, leading below into tall, narrow, subvertical, empty
air chambers, bounded by unistratose, chlorophyllose cell
walls. Storage tissue with rounded or angular cells, closely
packed together; rhizoids numerous, some smooth, others
pegged. Scales large and conspicuous, arising ventrally
and projecting far above thallus margins, triangular, dark
red to almost black or hyaline.
Monoicous or dioicous. Antheridia inedianly grouped
behind archegonia or mixed with them when monoicous,
embedded, with hyaline necks projecting, at their bases
surrounded by capillary hairs, vestigial or prominent. Ar-
chegonia several in a row along midline, flask-shaped,
protected in a continuous, crest-like, fleshy involucre, or
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
211
individually enclosed in conical or pyramidal, chambered
involucres with scales around the base. Sporangia without
stalk or foot, globose, capsule wall hyaline, unistratose,
delicate. Spores triangular-globular, anisopolar, black,
opaque; distal face with several large areolae, containing
a central nodule or not; proximal face with triradiate mark
distinct or not, irregularly reticulate or smooth. Elaters
absent, but some sterile cells reputed to be present.
Oxymitra cristata Gar side ex Perold , sp. nov.
Type: Cape, near Bredby Mine (25 miles S of Kuruman),
Schelpe 5900 (BOL, holo.).
Frondes caespitosae confertae, virides; squamae
ventrales atro-violaceae, oblique triangulares, marginem
frondis bene superantes. Antheridia in pulvillos medianos
lineares immersa. Archegonia ante antheridia posita, in
serie unica lineari disposita atque in involucra connata im-
mersa, cristam medianam prominentiam crenatam for-
mantia, bracteae desunt. Sporae 100-115 Jim diametro:
exterior (distalis) facies irregulariter reticulata, interior
(proximalis) facies laeves.
O. incrassata, species altera generis, archegoniis in in-
volucris conicis vel pyramidalibus singulatim inclusis,
bracteis multis concomitatis ab O. cristata differt.
Thallus smallish to medium-sized, apically emarginate,
dorsally deeply grooved along entire midline (Figure 4A,
C), except where interrupted by gametangia, broadly ovate
or oblong, bright green to deep green, dark red along mar-
gins, sometimes bronze-brown proximally, forming a
broad, deeply coloured ‘V’ over base, reticulate from
above, with outlines of subdorsal air chambers clearly vis-
ible, air pores tiny, hardly raised (Figure 4G), numerous
but singly placed above each polygonal air chamber, wet;
thallus margins incurved or raised and tightly clasped to-
gether, flanks covered by large, triangular, shiny dark red
scales, dry; in crowded, overlying patches, once to several
times pseudodichotomously furcate. Branches (3— )5 — 10(—
12) x 2.5^4.8 mm, 1 100-2000 |im thick over midrib; mar-
gins rather obtuse to acute, scalloped or undulating, much
exceeded by projecting, triangular scales; flanks deep pur-
ple, steeply rising (Figure 4C), to sloping obliquely up-
ward and outward (Figure 4D); ventral face rounded to
flattish, green (Figure 4B).
Dorsal epidermal cells unistratose, hyaline, from above
polygonal, (22.5-)37.5-45.0(-52.0) x 27.5-37.5(-47.5)
pm, in transverse section brick-shaped, 25-35 pm thick.
Air pores stellate (Figure 4H), small, simple, slightly
raised (Figure 4G), 5-10 pm wide, 4- or 5-(6)-sided (Fig-
ure 4H), 75-112 pm distant from each other, bounded by
4 or 5, rarely 6, small, bluntly wedge-shaped cells, 12.5-
15.0 x ± 25 pm across base, radial walls slightly thick-
ened, partly overlying, or occasionally adjoining larger,
polygonal cells. Assimilation tissue 400-600 pm thick
with air chambers empty (Figure 4F), in one layer, 32-65
(-100) pm wide, bounding walls unistratose, cells 37^17
x 25-35 pm; storage tissue composed of rounded or an-
gular cells, ± 50 pm wide. Rhizoids numerous, 17-25 pm
wide, some pegged, others smooth. Scales arising ven-
trally and projecting up to 375 pm above thallus margins,
dark red to almost black, shiny, basal part of apical scales
hyaline, densely imbricate, obliquely triangular (Figure
41), 1250-1375 pm long, 1075-1200 pm wide across
base, margins entire, sometimes crenate or shortly toothed
toward base of forwardly directed side, cells in body of
scale (4-)5- or 6-sided, ± 100 x 25 pm, smaller at rounded
margin.
Monoicous. Antheridia in a row along midline, proxi-
mal to archegonia (Figure 4A, E), immersed, necks hya-
line, cylindrical, 75 pm wide, protruding 210 pm above
dorsal surface. Archegonia in a median row, in flask-
shaped cavities, partly sunken into thallus and as a group
enclosed above by a 600 pm high, irregular, crest-like,
fleshy ridge (Figure 4D), tinged reddish on top around
openings of archegonial necks, these long and turning pur-
ple with age. Sporangia ventrally partly sunken into thal-
lus, dorsally bulging on either side of central crest, capsule
± 750 pm wide, wall hyaline, thin and delicate. Spores
( 108— )1 10—1 15(— 1 25) pm in diameter, triangular-globular,
polar, black, opaque, wing ± 5 pm wide, entire, anisopolar,
with ornamentation different on two faces: distal face
(Figure 5A-C) with 6 or 7 large central areolae, up to 30
pm wide, smaller toward margin, generally with a nodule
and thin radiating ridges in the middle of each, areolar
walls thick; proximal face with triradiate mark distinct
(Figure 5D, E), 3 facets with incomplete areolae, walls
irregular (Figure 5E, F), sometimes rather indistinct (Fig-
ure 5D). Chromosome number n = 18 (Baudoin 1976).
DISCUSSION
Grolle (pers. comm.) has pointed out to me that O.
cristata Garside was invalidly published as it did not com-
ply with Art. 37.1 of ICBN because it was published after
1 January 1958 without indication of the holotype.
Garside’s paper was published in April 1958 and two type
specimens were cited: Schelpe 5900 and Duthie 5531. but
no holotype was designated. Oxymitra cristata Garside ex
Perold is therefore accordingly newly described here, to-
gether with a Latin diagnosis; Schelpe 5900 is designated
as the holotype.
Oxymitra cristata is endemic to southern Africa, and
very rarely collected. Garside (1958) remarked that ‘the
detailed geographical distribution is not yet completely
known’ and this is still true today, only a few more col-
lections having been made during the intervening 35
years. It is known from Namibia, Orange Free State and
northern and eastern Cape (Figure 3). It has been found
mainly on substrates derived from ironstone, and it occa-
sionally grows in association with Plagiochasnra spp. and
Riccia spp. Oxymitra cristata is distinguished by its large,
obliquely triangular, shiny, dark red scales and by the row
of archegonia enclosed in an irregular, but continuous,
crest-like, fleshy ridge of tissue. Garside (1958) regarded
the ridges as composed of fused involucres. In the only
other species in the genus, O. incrassata (Brotero) Sergio
& Sim-Sim, better known as O. paleacea Bisch. ex
Lindenb. (Sergio & Sim-Sim 1989), each archegonium is
individually enclosed in a conical or pyramidal involucre,
containing air chambers and air pores. These involucres
are arranged in two rows along the midline and are ac-
companied by numerous bracts. Oxymitra incrassata also
differs from O. cristata by its hyaline ventral scales, by
its spore ornamentation, with the areolae on the distal face
lacking a central nodule and by the smooth facets on the
212
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
FIGURE 4. — Oxymitra cristata. Thalli. A, dorsal view of thallus with crest-like involucre and, proximally, row of antheridia; B, ventral view of
thallus; C, transverse section of thallus through dorsal groove; D, transverse section of thallus through involucre with archegonium; E,
transverse section through antheridia, dorsal cells and air chambers; G, transverse section through much enlarged air pore; H, air pore and
surrounding cells seen from above; I, ventral scale. A, B, D, Volk 00906 ; C, F— 1, Volk 81/050', E, Volk 00957. Scale bars: A-E, 2 mm; F-H,
50 pm; 1, 500 pm. Illustration by A. Pienaar.
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
213
FIGURE 5. — Oxymitra cristata. SEM micrographs of spores. A, B, distal face; C, side view of distal face; D. E, proximal face; F, side view of
proximal face with areolar walls more pronounced. A, D, Volk 00906 ; B, C, E, F, Volk 5050. A, B, D, E, x 320; C, F, x 345.
proximal face, by the chromosome number n = 9 and by
its distribution: it is known from Europe, North Africa,
the Canary Islands, North and South America.
Bischler (1988) records the presence of tubers in Oxy-
mitra, but these have not been observed in the present
investigation of O. cristata. The two species of Oxymitra
are placed in the family Oxymitraceae K. Mull, ex Grolle.
The sporangia, partially embedded in the thallus tissue,
the loss of a foot and seta of the capsule, the absence of
elaters, spore release only after destmction of surrounding
tissue and the sporeling type (Baudoin 1976), all indicate
the relationship of Oxymitraceae to Ricciaceae, and they
have been classified together in the suborder Ricciineae
(Schuster 1984), although Schier (1974), on the basis of
biochemical studies, had segregated the Oxymitraceae into
their own suborder, the Oxymitrineae.
Oil bodies have not been observed in O. cristata , but
Muller (1939) reports their presence (after Gyorffy) in the
storage tissue of O. incrassata during spring and autumn.
The generic description has had to be emended somewhat
to accommodate the gametangial differences in the two
species, the first set of particulars in each case referring
to O. cristata.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
NAMIBIA. — 2216 (Otjimbingwe): OM 37 Otjua, (-AA), Volk 00957
(herb. Volk). 2217 (Windhoek): Voigtland, feuchte Kliifte, (-CB), Volk
5050 (herb. Volk). 2218 (Gobabis); WIN 70, schattiges Talchen,
Glimmerschiefer (+ Plagiochasma sp. & Athalamia spathysii), (-??), Volk
00906 (PRE, herb. Volk).
O.F.S. — 2826 (Brandfort): Glen Agricultural College, on stony kop-
pie, (-CD), Zietsman 943 (PRE). 2926 (Bloemfontein): Bloemfontein,
Botanical Garden, not cultivated part, on hill, (-AA), Volk 81/050 (PRE);
Bloemfontein, next to Botanical Garden, shallow soil over rock, (-AA),
Volk 81/291 (PRE); Bloemfontein, near Hillandale, (-AA), Gemmell
( =Duthie 5501 ) (BOL); Bloemfontein. Eagle’s Nest, on ironstone kopje,
in shelter of grass and boulders, (-AA) Gemmel & Lutjeharms ( =Duthie
5460 ) (BOL).
CAPE. — 2723 (Kuruman): near Bredby Mine, 25 miles S of Kuru-
man, (-CA), Schelpe 5900 (BOL) (holotype). 2822 (Glen Lyon):
Olifantshoek area, on farm belonging to Mr Rossouw, on stony koppie,
with Riccia spp. and Plagiochasma sp. (-BA), Koekemoer 1024 (PRE);
Griqualand West, Groenwater Valley, Hay, east of Postmasberg (sic)
(Postmasburg], (-DD), Cooke s.n. ( =Duthie 5531) (BOL). 3027 (Lady
Grey): Herschel, mudbanks of Sterkspruit, with Riccia sp., (-CB), Hep-
bum CH 1043 (PRE).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I wish to thank the following: Dr R. Grolle, Jena, for
critically reading the manuscript and for his information
regarding the earlier publication date of Athalamia by Fal-
coner as well as for drawing my attention to the invalidity
of Oxymitra incrassata Garside, which I had missed in
Geissler & Bischler (1989); Prof. T. Poes, Eger, for also
refereeing the manuscript and Prof, (emer.) Dr O.H. Volk,
Wurzburg University, for the loan of some of his speci-
mens. My thanks also to the curator of BOL for the loan
of specimens; and to Ms M. Koekemoer, NBI, for col-
lecting specimens; to the artist, Ms A. Pienaar; the typist,
Mrs J. Mulvenna, and the photographer, Mrs A.
Romanowski, for their valued contributions.
REFERENCES
ARNELL. S. 1957. Hepaticae collected in South West Africa by Prof. Dr.
O.H. Volk. Mitteilungen der Botanischen Staatssammlung,
Miinchen 16: 262-272.
ARNELL, S. 1963. Hepaticae of South Africa. Swedish Natural Science
Council, Stockholm.
BAUDOIN, R. 1976. Caryologie, morphologie de la spore et germination
d’ Oxymitra cristata Garside. Revue bryologique et lichenologique
42: 577-588.
BISCHLER. H. 1988. Relationships in the Order Marchantiales
(Hepaticae). Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 64:
47-57.
214
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
BISCHOFF, G.W. 1835. Bemerkungen liber die Lebermoose, vorziiglich
aus den Gruppen der Marchantieen und Riccieen. Nova Acta
Academiae Caesareae Leopoldino-Carolinae Gennanicae Natu-
rae Curiosorum 17: 911-1018.
BORNEFELD, T. 1987. The natural system of the Marchantiales based
upon cytogenetical and morphological evidence. Nova Hedwigia
45:41-52.
DUMORTIER, B.C.J. 1822. Conunentationes botanicae.
DUMORTIER, B.C.J. 1874. Hepaticae Europae 13: 164.
FALCONER, H. 1848. Description of Athalamia, a new genus of
Marchantieae. Annals and Magazine of Natural History , Ser. 2.1:
375.
FALCONER, H. 1851. Athalamia , a new genus of Marchantieae. Trans-
actions of the Linnean Society 20: 397-399.
FREY, W. & KURSCHNER, H. 1988. Bryophytes of the Arabian Penin-
sula and Socotra. Nova Hedwigia 46: 37-120.
FRYE, T.C. & CLARK, L. 1937. Hepaticae of North America. University
of Washington Publications in Biology 6: 1-162.
GARSIDE, S. 1958. Studies in South African Ricciaceae. III. A new
species of Oxymitra. The Journal of South African Botany 24:
83-87.
GEISSLER, P. & BISCHLER, H. (Eds) 1989. Naiadea to Pycnoscenus.
Hepaticarum 11: 353.
GOTTSCHE, C.M., LINDENBERG, J.B.G. & NEES AB ESENBECK
C.G. 1844—1847. Synopsis hepaticarum. Hamburg, Meissner. Re-
printed 1967, Cramer, Lehre.
GREUTER, W. et al. 1988. International Code of Botanical Nomencla-
ture. Adopted by the Fourteenth International Botanical Congress
Berlin, July-August 1987.
GROLLE, R. 1 976. Verzeichnis der Lebermoose Europas und benachbar-
ter Gebiete. Feddes Repertorium 87: 171-279.
GROLLE, R. 1983. Nomina generica hepaticarum: references, types and
synonymies. Acta Botanica Fennica 121: 1-62.
HASSEL DE MENENDEZ, G.G. 1963 ‘1962’. Estudio de las Antho-
cerotales y Marchantiales de la Argentina. Opera Lilloana 7:
1-297.
HEITZ, E. 1927. Uber multiple und aberrante Chromosomenzahlen. III.
Das Genom der Lebermoose. Abhandlungen des Natunvissen-
schaftlichen Vereins zu Hamburg 21: 48-58.
HOWE, M. A. 1 899. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotes of California. Mem-
oirs of the Torrey Botanical Club 7: 1-208.
KASHYAP, S.R. 1915. Morphological and biological notes on new and
little known West Himalayan liverworts ILL The New Phytologist
14: 1-18.
LINDENBERG, J.B.W. 1829. Synopsis hepaticarum europaearum. Nova
Acta Academiae Caesareae Leopoldino-Carolinae Gennanicae
Naturae Curiosorum Suppl. 14: 1-33.
LINDBERG, S.O. 1863 ‘1862’. Om ett nytt slagte, Epipterygium.
Oefversigt Svensk Vetenskapsakademiens Forhandlingar 19:
599-609.
LINDBERG, S.O. 1868. Musci novi scandinavici. Notiser Sallskap pro
Fauna et Flora Fennica Forhandlingar 9: 255-299.
MONTAGNE, J. P. F. C. 1838. Cryptogams algeriennes. Annales des
Sciences Naturelles, Bot. Ser. 2,10: 334-345.
MULLER, K. 1939. Untersuchungen liber die Olkorper der Lebermoose.
Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 57: 326-370.
MULLER, K. 1940. Beitrage zur Systematik der Lebermoose. Hedwigia
79: 72-80.
MULLER, K. 1951-1958. Die Lebermoose Europas. Kryptogamenflora
6:416-471.
NEES AB ESENBECK, C.G. 1838. Naturgeschichte der europaischen
Lebermoose 4: 389—444.
SCHIER, W. 1974. Untersuchungen zur Chemotaxonomie der Mar-
chantiales. Nova Hedwigia 25: 549-566.
SCHIFFNER, V.F. 1893. Hepaticae (Lebermoose). Die Natiirlichen
Pflanzenfamilien 1,3: 3-141.
SCHUSTER, R.M. 1984. Evolution, phylogeny and classification of the
Hepaticae. In R.M. Schuster, New manual of Bryology 2: 892-
1170. Nichinan, Japan.
SCHUSTER, R.M. 1992. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of North
America 6: 1-937. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago.
SERGIO, C. & SIM-SIM, M. 1989. Riccia incrassata Brotero, a neg-
lected name of Oxymitra paleacea Bisch. ex Lindenb. Journal of
Bryology 15: 659-663.
SHIMIZU, D. & HATTORI, S. 1954. Marchantiales of Japan. III. Journal
of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 12: 53-75.
SHIMIZU, D. & HATTORI, S. 1955. Marchantiales of Japan. IV. Journal
of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 14: 91-107.
STEPHANI, F. 1895. Hepaticae africanae. Botanische Jahrbiicher fur
Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 20: 299-
321.
STEPHANI, F. 1898. Species hepaticarum. Bulletin de VHerbier Boissier
6: 757-799.
STEPHANI, F. 1905. Hepaticarum species novae. XI. Hedwigia 44:
72-75.
TREVISAN DE SAINT-LEON, V.B.A. 1877. Schema di una nuova
classificazione della Epatiche. Memoire del Reale Istituto
Lombardo di Scienze e Lettere Ser. 3,4: 383^-51.
VANDEN BERGHEN, C. 1965. Hepatiques recoltees par le Dr J.-J.
Symoens dans la region peri-Tanganyikaises. Bulletin de la
Societe Royale de Botanique de Belgique 98: 129-174.
VOLK, O.H. 1979. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Lebermoose (Mar-
chantiales) aus Siidwestafrika (Namibia) 1. Mitteilungen der
Botanischen Staatssammlung, Miinchen 15: 223-242.
Bothalia 23,2: 215-221 (1993)
Studies in the M archantiales (Hepaticae) from southern Africa. 3. The genus
Targionia and T. hypophylla with notes on T. lorbeeriana and Cyathodium
foetidissimum (Targioniaceae)
S.M. PEROLD*
Keywords: Cyathodium , Hepaticae, Marchantiales, southern Africa, Targionia , Targioniaceae, T. hypophylla , T. lorbeeriana, Targionioideae
ABSTRACT
A taxonomic account of the genus, Targionia, and its only representative in southern Africa, the almost cosmopolitan T.
hypophylla , is given here. Much more southern African and other material, than was available to the previous authors, Sim
(1926) and Amell (1963) has been examined.
Material collected at Knysnaby Duthie was identified by Arnell (1963) as Cyathodium foetidissimum, but is shown to have
been misidentified and is actually a specimen of Riccia rubricollis. The presence of the genus, Cyathodium in southern Africa,
has not been confirmed.
U1TTREKSEL
’n Verslag oor die genus Targionia en sy enigste verteenwoordiger in Suider-Affika, die byna kosmopolitiese T. hypophylla,
word hier gegee. Baie meer materiaal is ondersoek as wat vir die vorige outeurs, Sim (1926) en Amell (1963), beskikbaar was.
Materiaal wat Duthie by Knysna versamel het, is deur Amell ( 1 963) gei'dentifiseer as Cyathodium foetidissimum. Dit is egter
verkeerdelik benaam en die materiaal is "n voorbeeld van Riccia rubricollis. Die teenwoordigheid van die genus Cyathodium in
Suider-Afrika is nie bevestig nie.
Targionia (Micheli) L., Species plantarum 2: 1136
(1753); Gott. et al. : 574 (1846); Schiffn.: 26 (1893);
Steph.: 763 (1898); Macvicar: 33 (1926); Sim: 16 (1926);
K. Mull.: 325 (1951-1958); Hassel de Menendez: 68
(1963); Arnell: 46 (1963). Type species: Targionia
hypophylla L.
Thallus , medium-sized, fleshy, lobes linear, sometimes
widening toward apex or cordate, somewhat leathery, light
green to darker green, often with a waxy bloom, in
crowded patches or extensive sheets; on soil in sheltered
rocky clefts or a pioneer on disturbed soil.
Branches often simple, sometimes repeatedly furcate
or only apically branched, or with ventral innovations;
thickened over midrib, rather abruptly thinning into wings;
apex notched, tips of scale appendages curving backwards
over it; not grooved. Dorsal epidermis hyaline, cell walls
thickened, especially at comers; air pores simple, conspic-
uous, slightly raised, with 3 concentric rings of cells, their
walls thin, leading below into shallow air chambers con-
taining chlorophyllose filaments; oil cells present; storage
tissue 3-5 times thicker than assimilation tissue above;
ventrally purple-black; some rhizoids smooth, others
pegged. Scales in one row on each side of midrib, dark
purple, large, obliquely triangular with broadly ‘awf-
shaped appendage.
Autoicous or dioicous. Antheridia mostly embedded in
swollen disciform apex of small male branch, arising ven-
trally at side of midrib and emerging laterally. Archegonia
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001.
MS. received: 1992-10-23.
formed at apex of thallus, and subsequently capsule dis-
placed to just below apex, enclosed in bivalved involucre
which opens at central narrow vertical fissure; capsule
wall cells with annular thickening bands. Spores convex
distally, ornamented with a double network, the larger net-
work forming strongly raised, rounded ridges which en-
close polygonal areas, all covered by a reticulum of
smaller, fine ridges. Elaters bispiral, sometimes branched.
Targionia hypophylla L., Species plantarum: 1136
(1753); Steph.: 764 (1898); Macvicar: 33 (1926); Sim: 16
(1926); K. Mull.: 326 ( 1951-1958); Hassel de Menendez:
69 (1963); Amell: 46 (1963); Volk: 241 (1979); Piippo:
274 (1991). Types: ‘Italia, Hispania, Constantinopoli’-t- ci-
tation (syn.); (OXF, syn.) Dill.: 532. Lichen no. 9, tab. 78,
fig. 9. (1741); (H-SOL, isosyn.) [according to Isoviita
(1970) and quoted by Grolle (1976)].
T. michelii Corda: 649 (1829). Type: Italy, leg. Sieber.
T. mexicana Lehm. & Lindenb. in Lehm.: 27 (1832). Type: Mexico,
leg. Schiede.
T. capensis Hiibener: 17 (1834).
T. hypophylla var. capensis (Hiib.) Krauss: 135 (1846). Type: Cape,
‘in promont. bonae Spei-, leg. Zeyher.
T. bifurca Nees & Mont, in Mont.: 113 (1838); Nees: 315 (1838).
Type: Chile, ‘prope Quillota", leg. Brotero.
T. convoluta Lindenb. & Gott. in Gott. et al:. 576 (1846). Type:
Mexico, ad Chinantla, leg. Liebman.
Thallus medium-sized, somewhat leathery, linear to lig-
ulate, apically often slightly broader, dark green, some-
times with bluish tint, marginally purple and entire to
somewhat crenate or scalloped, flat above, not grooved.
216
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
FIGURE 1 — Targionia hypophylla , A, dorsal aspect of thallus with tip of involucre protruding at apex; B, thallus with short ventrally innovating
branch bearing terminal disc with antheridia; C, ventral aspect of thallus with pouch-like involucre at apex and 2 rows of ventral scales; D
tran verse section of thallus; E, air pore from above; F, transverse section of air pore, dorsal cells and chlorophyllose filaments; G, scale with
margins ± intact; H, scale with fimbriate appendage; I, cells of capsule wall with thickening bands. A, C, D. F, I, Koekemoer477a\ B, E, G,
Garside 6674\ H, Schelpe 4947. A, B, C, x 1 1 ; D, x 22; E, x 300; F, x 275; G, H, x 55; I, x 250.
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
217
polygonal outlines of subdorsal air chambers clearly vis-
ible from above, each with large and well-spaced air pore,
wet (Figure 1A); flanks ventrally deep purple and fre-
quently incurved, branches becoming almost tubular, or
sides clasped together, mostly covering dorsal epidermis
with its conspicuous white-encircled air pores, distal ven-
tral scales exposed, leading branch often becoming erect
and elevating ventral sporophyte, dry; in crowded patches,
simple to repeatedly furcate or with ventral or apical in-
novations. Branches 5-10 mm long between furcations,
total length up to 30 mm, 2. 7-3. 5 mm wide, 550 pm thick
over midrib, laterally thinning out into wings; apex
slightly notched with tips of scales reflexed over edge in
sterile plants or, when female receptacle present, entire
and lacking apical scales; margins acute, thin, ventrally
purple; flanks sloping obliquely outward and upward (Fig-
ure ID); ventral face medianly keeled, mostly purple, on
either side of midrib with row of imbricate, apically di-
rected, purple to reddish ± triangular scales (Figure 1C).
Dorsal epidermal cells unistratose, hyaline, from above
rounded to oval, 22.5-37.5 x 17.5-25.0 pm, trigones con-
spicuous, in transverse section cells ± 45 pm high, rec-
tangular, lateral walls thickened; marginal cells mostly
purple, from above rectangular, trapezoid or triangular,
(25-)30— 45(-50) x 20-32 pm, second row purple as well
or sometimes hyaline, also variable in shape and size,
22.5-50.0 x 15.0-17.5 pm, an inner third or fourth row
of cells frequently also present, all lacking trigones; mar-
ginal cells at apex of thallus ( 1 7— )22— 35 x ( 12— )25— 37
pm; air pores somewhat raised, simple, 52.5-67.5 x 35.0-
40.0 pm. oval or rounded (Figure IE), 250-375 pm distant
from each other, bounded by 3 concentric rings of cells:
innermost annular row of ± 6 thin-walled, curved, hyaline
cells, ± 15 x 25 pm, the remains of a collapsed cell ring,
next row of 8-11 sausage-shaped cells, ± 22 x 30 pm,
slightly thicker-walled, partly overlying outermost row of
14 also sausage-shaped cells, ± 27 x 35 pm; assimilation
tissue with air chambers in one layer, ± 80 pm thick, con-
taining simple or branched. 2- or 3-celled chlorophyllose
filaments, cells (20.0— )22. 5-34.0 x 25.0 pm, those below
air pores larger (Figure IF), 47.0 x 37.5 pm, with numer-
ous chloroplasts, and except at air pores, in close prox-
imity to dorsal cells; storage tissue ± 425 pm thick, cells
closely packed, angular, variable in size, 17.5-50.0 pm
wide, occasional cells with oil bodies, ± 27.5 pm wide;
rhizoids mainly between scales, some smooth, others
pegged. ± 15 pm wide. Scales in 2 longitudinal rows, one
on either side of costa, reddish to dark purple, obliquely
triangular, imbricate, not or hardly reaching thallus mar-
gins, 875-1750 pm long and up to 1325 pm wide at base,
if receptacle present, those covering it proximally larger,
2250 pm in length, basally up to 2000 pm wide, apically
continuing into single, forwardly directed, long-acuminate
appendage (Figure 1G), ± 375 pm long; cells in body of
scale 4-6-sided, ± 80.0 x 17.5 pm. in appendage 32.5-
62.5 x 22.5-27.5 pm, below appendage, polygonal, (20—
)37-60 x 25-45 pm, scattered oil cells present, margin
entire or not, sometimes with single-celled papillae, 30.0
x 17.5 pm or with fimbria (Figure 1H) ± 75 x 25 pm or
longer, especially at appendage of apical scales.
Autoicous or dioicous. Androecia borne on short, ven-
trally innovating branches, protruding at sides of thallus,
on terminal disc, 1.3-1. 8 mm wide, 750 pm thick and
encircled above by low, frilly membrane; antheridia seve-
ral, with conical protruberances, 150 pm high, each with
opening leading into antheridial cavity below. Gynoecia
terminal, enclosed in large, ± 3125 x 3600 pm, shiny
black, mussel-like, bivalved involucre, displaced below
apex of thallus, wall 4-layered, cells in outer layer thick-
walled on outside, 4-7-sided. 62.5-150.0 x 32.5-45.0 pm,
in inner layers thin-walled, elongated, ± 100 x 40 pm,
interspersed with numerous oil cells; to release spores and
elaters, involucre opening along narrow central vertical
fissure fringed with several irregular, cellular protuber-
ances; pseudoperianth lacking; calyptra hyaline, delicate,
cells irregular in shape and size, 45.0-55.0 x 27.5 pm;
capsule subsessile, spherical, wall yellowish brown, cells
± rectangular to mostly spindle-shaped, ± 75 x 35 pm,
with thickening bands (Figure II) ± 5 pm wide. Spores
(47 — )62— 77(— 95) pm in diameter, light brown to brown
or dark reddish brown, anisopolar, 2 faces different in
shape and ornamentation, distal face convex, rounded,
with double network (Figure 2A, D-F), the larger network
consisting of raised, rounded ridges, enclosing 16 or 17
polygonal areas, 12.5-17.5 pm wide, all covered by su-
perimposed, fine reticulum, the areolae of which mostly
smaller on sides and crests of primary ridges and larger
within enclosures; proximal face only slightly rounded to
flattish or even somewhat hollowed, generally with very
irregularly contorted, closely drawn together, reticulated
ridges separated by narrow fissures (Figure 2B); at junc-
ture of proximal and distal faces, when seen from inner
face, encircling row of reticulated primary ridges on distal
face projecting beyond rim of smaller proximal face, ap-
pear to form an undulating wing, ± 10 pm wide. Elaters
yellowish brown, not tapering but sometimes branched,
doubly spiral (Figure 2C). up to 290 x 12.5 pm. Chro-
mosome number : n = 9 (Bomefeld 1987).
DISCUSSION
In the family Targioniaceae, two subfamilies, Tar-
gionioideae and Cyathodioideae Grolle, are recognized,
each with only a single genus. They are characterized by
gynoecia that become ventrally displaced at the apex of
the thallus and capsules which are enclosed in a bivalved.
mussel-shaped involucre.
In Targionia species the thalli are compact and some-
what leathery, with low air chambers containing chloro-
phyllose filaments and a thick layer of storage tissue
below; in Cyathodium species the thalli are delicate, with
tall air chambers lacking chlorophyllose filaments and
with much reduced storage tissue.
To date, no monographic studies have been done on
the genus Targionia , although as many as 26 names have
been recorded under it (Geissler & Bischler 1990). Piippo
(1991), however, recently speculated that most of these
names will undoubtedly prove to be synonyms of T.
hypophylla. There are at least two other Targionia species
with well-defined specific limits, namely T. stellaris (K.
Mull.) Hassel de Menendez (1963) from Argentina and
a new species from India reported by Udar & Gupta
(1983).
Targionia hypophylla , the only representative of the
genus, is a widespread, almost cosmopolitan species [for
total range see Piippo (1991)], occurring especially in tem-
perate and seasonally dry areas where it grows as a xero-
218
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
FIGURE 2. — Targionia hypophylla. SEM micrographs of spores and an elater. A, D-F, distal face of spore; B, proximal face of spore; C, elater.
A-C, S.M. Perold 2365\ D, Koekemoer 433\ E, Garside 6573 (Round House); F, Schelpe 4947. A, x 500; B, x 530; C, x 490; D, x 445; E,
x 560; F, x 460.
phyte on soil in rock crevices, on soil over rock outcrops
or under rock overhangs, or as a pioneer on disturbed
earth banks, like road cuttings. Sometimes other liverworts
such as Riccia spp., Plagiochasma spp., or Mannia spp.
are also present.
Targionia hypophylla is easily recognised, when fertile,
by the ventrally displaced capsule contained in a shiny
black pouch at the apex, by which further lengthening of
the branches is arrested. Sterile plants are distinguished
by their dark green, somewhat leathery appearance, the
conspicuous white-encircled air pores and reddish to pur-
ple-black triangular ventral scales with a single append-
age. Kashyap (1914) regards it as a very variable species,
and so does Schuster (1992), who thinks that incipient
speciation is under way; on the other hand Muller (1951-
1958) observes that, in spite of its wide distribution, plants
display little variation and the species is probably very
old. It is somewhat similar to Mannia spp., but these differ
from it by their less conspicuous air pores and by capsules
borne aloft on a longish stalk. Plagiochasma spp. have
smaller air pores and more pronounced spicules on the
dorsal epidermal cells, with the capsules also raised on a
stalk.
T. hypophylla was previously described from southern
Africa by Sim (1926) and Arnell ( 1963). It has been quite
rarely collected in Namibia (from whence Volk (1979)
recorded 14 collections), central Transvaal, Natal, Orange
Free State, Lesotho, Transkei, central, southern and
eastern Cape, but frequently in the winter rainfall areas
of the north western and southwestern Cape (Figure 4).
Further north in Africa it has also been recorded from
Ghana by Jones & Harrington ( 1983), Tanzania (Bizot el
al. 1978), Kenya and again Tanzania (Bizot et al. 1985),
Malawi (S.M. Perold 2665 PRE), Zambia (Vanden
Berghen 1972), Zimbabwe (Sim 1926; Best 1990) and the
adjacent islands of Madagascar (Arnell 1963) and
Reunion (Bischler 1990), although in the latter report, it
is listed as T. hypophylla and in brackets, ‘or T. lor-
beeriana ’. Frey & Kiirschner (1988) report T. hypophylla
from the Arabian Peninsula (together with T. lorbeeriana)
as well as a possible new morphotype, I hypophylla spp.
linealis (spp. nova?). T. elongata is also known from Af-
rica (Ethiopia), and Scott & Pike (1988) have published
SEM micrographs of its spores, which are very distinct
and clearly different from those of T. hypophylla , in that
there are only 5 or 6 large, ± smooth areas on the distal
face, as opposed to the usual 16 or 17 reticulated ones in
T. hypophylla. On a recent visit to Malawi, some speci-
mens of Targionia were collected, one of which, S.M. Per-
old 2653, had up to 30 reticulated areas (Figure 3F),
7.5-10.0 pm wide, on the distal face; the spore diameters
were 65-72 pm. It is not certain, however, whether we
are dealing with a different species or not.
Targionia hypophylla L. var . fhnbriata K. Muller is not
treated as a distinct variety in this study of southern Af-
rican specimens as was done by Arnell (1963), because
the presence of fimbria along the ventral scale margins is
very variable, even in thalli from the same population.
Apical scales are also more frequently fimbriate than older
ventral scales on the same branch. Schuster (1992) regards
the intrapopulational variation in this feature as so great
that no taxonomic segregation of the two extremes seems
possible to him.
Statistical and other studies by several authors (Sergio
& Queiroz Lopes 1972; Zamora et al. 1990; Jovet-Ast
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
219
FIGURE 3. — Targionia spp. SEM micrographs of spores. A-E, T. lorbeeriana : A-D, distal face; E. proximal face. F, distal face of T. sp. A, Sergio
& Sim-Sim Lev. 70: B. Cros et al. 1 2- VII- 1 984; C, Sergio 148161: D, E, S. Arnell s.n. (Tenerife); F. S.M. Perold 2653 (Malawi). A, x 550;
B. x 490; C, x 635; D. E, x 580; F, x 620.
1956; Jovet-Ast & Zigliara 1967 and Zigliara 1970) have
confirmed the existence of an allied species, T. lorbeeriana
(Muller 1940) of which I have studied the type specimen
(leg. Huber-Tharandl, (5) collected in Sicily). Arnell
(1963) and Magill & Schelpe (1979) record the presence
of T. lorbeeriana in southern Africa, but this could not be
confirmed in the present investigation although (Arnell
(1963) even records T. lorbeeriana var. fimbriata from
here). The specimens which Arnell placed under T.
lorbeeriana , Garside 6573 [spore diameter 57.5-62.5 pm
(Figure 2E)] and Schelpe 4947 [spore diameter 75-85 pm
(Figure 2F)] are undoubtedly T. hypophylla, judging by
their spore ornamentation and cell measurements of the
thalli and scales. The correct naming of old dried herbar-
ium material is, however, difficult, since the colour of the
thalli fades, as does the distinctive odour of T. lorbeeriana.
Spore ornamentation (see later) seems to be a more reli-
able and certainly more permanent distinguishing charac-
ter. Grolle ( 1983) regards reports of the occurrence of T.
lorbeeriana in the East African Chyulu Mountains (Bizot
et al. 1978), as well as in the Cape (and India), as needing
verification. Targionia lorbeeriana is thought to be a "trip-
loid race' of T. hypophylla, as it has 27 chromosomes. It
is said to be characterized by a strong smell of acid pear
drops when fresh; by the cordate shape and light green
colour of the thallus; by larger, oval air pores and by dif-
ferent cell dimensions [for the latter see Zamora et al.
(1990)]. Schier (1974) reports slight differences in the
flavonoids of the two species. Differences in the spore
ornamentation of the two species were demonstrated by
Jovet-Ast & Zigliara ( 1967). Scott & Pike (1988) consider
the spore sculpturing as the clearest and least ambiguous
way of separating the two species: in their Australian ma-
terial they consistently found that T. hypophylla has reg-
ular areolae, whereas in T. lorbeeriana the areolae are
irregular in arrangement.
Spore samples of 20 different specimens of T. lorbeeri-
ana (on loan from European herbaria) were presently stud-
ied with the SEM and compared with more than 40 spore
samples of local T. hypophylla. In T. lorbeeriana spores
there are fewer ridges on the proximal face (Figure 3E)
and on the distal face, the fine reticulum, particularly that
covering the inside of the polygonal areas of the coarse
reticulum, has thicker walls (Figure 3 A-D); the proximal
spore face in T. hypophylla has numerous contorted ridges
and the walls on the distal face are thin and the areolae
oval or irregular in shape and size, the fine mesh present-
ing an altogether 'looser' appearance (Figure 2A, D-F).
Of the southern African material examined, spore orna-
mentation of Magill 6606. Van Rooy 2973, 3142a seems
to be intermediate between T. hypophylla and T. lorbeeri-
ana. Judging by my findings, the illustrations by Scott &
220
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
Pike (1988: plate 1.1), appear to be of T. lorbeeriana and
1.2 of T. hypophylla , in other words, the reverse of what
they are stated to be. The T. hypophylla spores illustrated
by Taylor et al. ( 1974) are closely similar to those in my
study.
Cyathodium foetidissimum Schiffner
Arnell (1963) observed that a specimen in the National
Herbarium, Pretoria, collected by A.V. Duthie at Belve-
dere, Knysna, probably belongs to this species, i.e.
Cyathodium foetidissimum. This specimen has been ex-
amined and its spores photographed. It is undoubtedly a
species of Riccia and the ornamentation of the spores
proves it to be R. rubricollis Garside & Duthie ex Perold
(Perold 1991). On the small specimen packet inside the
larger envelope, in Sim’s handwriting is the note ‘Miss
Duthie’s (No. 23) new Riccia , Belvedere, Aug. 1928’ and
below it, in ArneH’s writing and signed by him is the
annotation ‘Cyathodium sp.'. One wonders why Arnell
had ignored Sim’s identification, as the latter must have
received the specimen from Duthie herself. In mitigation,
it may be added though, that the material had been pressed
and it is only a small sample, perhaps even a little atypical,
but the internal sporangia and spores immediately place
it correctly.
The other two species of Cyathodium , C. africanum
and C. aureonitens which Arnell (1963) thought would
possibly be found in southern Africa, have so far not been
collected here and it is doubtful if they ever will be, since
they are conspicuous and luminous green, and it is un-
likely that they could have been overlooked. The presence
of the genus, Cyathodium in southern Africa has therefore
not been confirmed although it is very widely distributed
in the rest of Africa (Jones 1952).
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
NAMIBIA. — 2217 (Windhoek): Dassieskuppe, Ostseite, an schat-
tigen Felsen, in Moosgesellschaft, (-CB), Volk 11357 (M, PRE).
TRANSVAAL. — 2428 (Nylstroom): Waterberg Game Park along
Melk River, shady riverbank, (-AB), Leistner 3558 (PRE). 2527 (Rusten-
burg): Swartkop Picnic Resort, near Randburg, on steep earth bank above
stream, (-DD), S.M. Perold 249 (PRE). 2528 (Pretoria): Pretoria, along
Apies River, (-CA), Scott 23 (PRE). 2529 (Witbank): Witbank. C.R.
Swart Nat. Res., at subsidiary stream entering Olifants River from west,
on streambed, clay soil, (-CD), Glen 1475 (PRE).
NATAL.- — 2828 (Bethlehem): Drakensberg, Royal Natal Nat. Park,
Broome Hill, in forest, (-DB), Cholnoky 182 (BOL); Drakensberg, lower
western slopes of Sentinel along footpath to chain ladder, alpine
heath/grassland with igneous rock outcrops, (-DB), Magill 6606 (PRE).
2929 (Underberg): Sani Pass Hotel, opposite bank of Mkhomazana River,
at waterfall, on soil, (-CB), S.M. Perold 2509 (PRE); halfway up Sani
Pass, vertical rock wall, with earth pockets, on soil, (-CB), S.M. Perold
2517 ( PRE).
O.F.S. — 2926 (Bloemfontein): Bloemfontein, Eagle’s Nest, (-AA),
Potts CH 1 143 (PRE); Bloemfontein, (-AA), T.R. Sim CH 1137 (PRE);
Farm Lastpoort on the Ruigtespruit, between Reddersburg and Helvetia,
grassland with trees and shrubs, on soil, (-DC), Van Rooy 2345 (PRE).
LESOTHO. — 2828 (Bethlehem): 5 km from New Oxbow Lodge to
Mokhotlong, waterfall over basalt cliff in tributary of Fanana River, near
Maiuti Club Ski Chalet, alpine heath-grassland, S aspect, on soil in
sheltered rock crevice, (-DC), Van Rooy 2961, 2973 (PRE); 6 km from
New Oxbow Lodge to Mokhotlong, alpine heath-grassland, on soil over
basalt, (-DC), Van Rooy 3058 (PRE); 4 km from New Oxbow Lodge to
Butha Buthe, alpine heath-grassland, on soil bank at flattish basalt out-
crops, NW aspect, (-DC), Van Rooy 3142a (PRE). 2929 (Underberg):
Kotisephola Pass, between Sani Top and Mokhotlong, alpine heath-grass-
land, basalt outcrops at top of pass, rock overhang, (-CA), Van Rooy 3399
(PRE); Sani River banks, ± 7 km from Sani Top, along road to Mokhot-
long, alpine heath-grassland, on soil in rock crevice, (-CA), Van Rooy
346 T. Sani Top, mountain slopes, W of Border Post, alpine heath-grass-
land, on soil, (-CB), Van Rooy 3554 (PRE).
TRANSKEI. — 3127 (Lady Frere): near top of Cala Pass, moist verti-
cal bank in road cutting, (-BC), Glen 1718 (PRE).
CAPE. — 2824 (Kimberley): Kimberley, (-DB), Welman CH 1141
(PRE). 2917 (Springbok): in valley leading from Ookiep to 'Ropeway’,
damp corners under ledges, (-DB), Giffen CH 1136 (PRE). 3018
(Kamiesberg): Inkruip, northern Khamiesberg, south slopes, damp
ground in lee of large granite boulders, (-AA), Oliver 7220 (PRE); Sors
Sors area, NE of Kamieskroon, (-AA), Oliver 9206 (PRE): 19 km NE of
Kamieskroon, 5 km after turnoff on road to Rooifontein, (-AA), S.M.
Perold 1473 (PRE); 2 km beyond Willem Stone Bridge, Pedroskloof, on
road to Rooifontein, on soil under rock, (-AA), S.M. Perold 1496 (PRE);
3 km along Rooifontein road, after turnoff from Kamieskroon-Leliefont-
ein road, on soil beneath rock overhang, (-AA), S.M. Perold 2138 (PRE);
5.2 km along Rooifontein road, after turnoff from Kamieskroon-
Leliefontein road, (-AA), S.M. Perold 2169 (PRE); southern Khamies-
berg, Klippoort, SE of Hoedberg, granite hill, slope facing south, sandy
hollows, (-CB). Oliver 9557 (PRE). 3023 (Britstown): Britstown, Farm
Jakkalskuile, (-AD ),Viljoen CH 4523 (PRE). 3026(Aliwal North); Albert
Dist., ± 12 km SE of Bethulie, Cliftonvale Farm, foot of rocky cliffs,
seepage zone, (-CA), H.H. Burrows 2522 (PRE). 3027 (Lady Grey): Dist.
Herschel, Sterkspruit, (-CA), Hepburn CH 1138. CH 1139 (PRE);
Witteberg Mts, Joubert’s Pass, 8 km east of Lady Grey, western aspect ,
alpine heath-grassland, on soil, (-CB), Van Rooy 2700 (PRE). 3118
(Vanrhynsdorp): Gifberg. SE of Van Rhynsdorp, at top of mountain,
underneath rock, drier area away from stream, (-DC), S.M. Perold 2754
(PRE). 3119 (Calvinia): Van Rhyns Pass, at top of plateau, on soil, (-AC),
S.M. Perold 2186 (PRE); Hantamsberge, top of mountain near FM tower,
mountain rhenosterveld, rock and soil pockets, (-BD), Koekemoer 822
(PRE); south side of Hantams Mountain, near FM tower, on soil between
rocks, (-BD), S.M. Perold 1824 (PRE); Farm Daantjie-se-kraal, 37 km
along road between Soetwater and Clanwilliam. 8 km before Botterkloof
Pass, (-CB/CD), S.M. Perold 1871 (PRE); Vondelingsfontein, northern
Roggeveld, damp ground in lee of shrubs, (-DD), Oliver 8911 (PRE);
Vondelingsfontein Farm, 10 km from Calvinia on road to Middelpos,
along small streamlets at roadside, (-DD), S.M. Perold 1839 (PRE). 3120
(Williston): northern Roggeveld. Knegtsbank, kloof north of farm, south
slopes with dense rhenosterbos scrub, (-CC), Oliver 8920 (PRE). 3218
(Clanwilliam): middle slopes of Pakhuis Pass, on Clanwilliam side, (-
BB), Koekemoer 433 (PRE); Aggensbachsberge, ground forest, (-BB),
Stirton 9280 (PRE); 20 km N of Citrusdal, past Hexriver Farm, on rocky
outcrops at roadside, above Olifantsrivier, (-BD), S.M. Perold 530 (PRE);
5 km along road to Algeria, after turnoff from Cedarberg road, under
damp overhang near road, (-BD), S.M. Perold 2351 (PRE). 3219
(Wuppertal): 3 km before turnoff to BiedouwAVupperthal, on R364,
between Soetwater and Clanwilliam. at streamlet, on sand over sand-
stone, (-AA), S.M. Perold 1883 (PRE); 4 km south of Algeria Forest
Station, (-AC), S.M. Perold 2365 (PRE); Ceres, Kaggakamma Nat. Res.,
near beacon 3 in streambed, at foot of boulders, (-DA), Koekemoer 768,
769, 770 (PRE). 3220 (Sutherland): 24 km NW from Sutherland
(Roggeveld Mtns), occasional in S aspect rock crevices, (-AB) Schelpe
4952 (BOL); 2 mis N from Sutherland, occasional on S aspect rock edges
under bushes, (-BC), Schelpe 4947 { BOL); Verlaten Kloof, 18 mis S from
Sutherland, locally frequent under asparagus bushes on S aspect, shale
slope, (-DA). Schelpe 4942 (BOL); Sutherland, near top of Komsberg
Pass, in rhenosterveld, on sandy-loamy soil, (-DB), Vlok 2667 (PRE);
Smoushoogte, Klein Roggeveld, damp southern slope, with short
rhenosterbos scrub, (-DC), Oliver 8969 (PRE). 3318 (Cape Town): Pen-
insula, Constantia slopes, (-CD), S. Amell 379 (BOL); Kirstenbosch,
(-CD), S. Arnell 565 (BOL); Cave Peak (-CD), S. Arnell 615 (BOL);
Lion's Head, Round House, (-CD), S. Arnell 1176 (PRE); behind Round
House, Camps Bay, on granite soil, (-CD), Garside 6495 (BOL); Round
House, Camps Bay, on soil, (-CD), Garside 6573 (BOL); Camps Bay,
below Round House, (-CD), Garside 6674 (BOL); Table Mountain,
Slongoli, (-CD), T.R. Sim CH 1149 (PRE); Devil’s Peak, (-CD), T.R. Sim
CH 1142 (PRE); Cape Town, (-CD), H.A. Wager CH 1133 (PRE);
Stellenbosch Flats, (-DD), Duthie CH 1148 (PRE); Stellenbosch, (-DD),
Duthie CH 1147 (PRE); Jonkershoek road, Stellenbosch, earth bank by
side of road, (-DD). Garside H60 (BOL); Jonkershoek, Stellenbosch,
(-DD), Garside 9 (PRE). 3319 (Worcester): Gydo Pass, on soil, (-AB),
Stirton 9160 (PRE); Hex River Pass road, occasional on shaded earthbank
in dry stream bank, (-BD), Schelpe 4918 (BOL); Hex River Pass, near
summit, gulley, on damp ground, (-BD), Stirton 9482 (PRE); Bainskloof,
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
221
NE of Wellington, vertical rock wall at roadside, on soil, (-CA), S.M.
Perold 2785 (PRE); Worcester Karroo Garden, amongst karoid shrubs,
(-CB). Koekemoer 364 (PRE); Farm Leipzig, east of Worcester, at foot of
Rabiesberg, on soil on rock face, (-DA), Morley 289 (PRE); Sandhills,
north of Worcester, near railway line, on soil on rock outcrop, (-DA), S.M.
Perold 579 (PRE). 3320 (Montagu): Montagu, Bath Kloof, (-CC), S.
Amell 749. 758 (BOL). 3322 (Oudtshoom): Prince Albert, at northern
base of Swartberg Pass, in arid mountain fynbos, on loamy sandy soil,
(-AC), Vlok 2660 (PRE); Meirings Poort, North of De Rust, near
Oudtshoom, on earth bank above road, (-BC), S.M. Perold 898 (PRE);
near Hoekplaas, on gravel road from De Rust to Uniondale, on rocky
slope under karoo bushes, (-DB), Koekemoer 477a (PRE). 3325 (Port
Elizabeth): Hells Gate, Uitenhage, (-CD), T.R. Sim CH 1140 (PRE). 3419
(Caledon): Greyton Kloof; on soil on rock wall next to footpath, (-BA),
S.M. Perold 607. 1170 (PRE); Betty’s Bay, (-BD), S. Amell 695 (BOL).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
My sincere gratitude to Drs C. Sergio, LISU, and A.J.E.
Smith, Bangor, for refereeing this article and for their
helpful suggestions. I also wish to thank the following for
the loan of specimens; Dr C. Sergio, LISU, the curators
of BOL and S; Prof. Dr O.H. Volk, Wurzburg, and Dr R.
Liibenau-Nestle, Kempten, Germany; my thanks to my
colleagues at NBI, Dr H.L. Glen, Miss M. Koekemoer and
Mr J. van Rooy, for collecting specimens; also to the artist,
Ms G. Condy, the typist Mrs J. Mulvenna and the pho-
tographer Mrs A. Romanowski, for their valued contribu-
tions. Miss S.K. Marner, OXL, is thanked for kindly
sending photographs of Targionia hypophylla from
Dillenius's herbarium.
REFERENCES
ARNELL, S. 1963. Hepaticae of South Africa. Swedish Natural Science
Council, Stockholm.
BEST, E.B. 1990. The Bryophyta of Zimbabwe — an annotated checklist.
Kirkia 13: 293-318.
BISCHLER, H. 1990. Quelques Marchantiales de Pile de la Reunion.
Cryptogamie. Bryologique et Lichenologique 11: 169-171.
BIZOT, M„ FRHS, I„ LEWINSKY, J. & POCS, T. 1978. East African
bryophytes IV. Danish collections. Lindbergia 4: 259-284.
BIZOT, M„ POCS, T. & SHARP, A.J. 1985. Results of a bryogeo-
graphical expedition to East Africa in 1968, III. The Bryologist 88:
135-142.
BORNEFELD, T. 1987. The natural system of the Marchantiales based
upon cytogenetic and morphological evidence. Nova Hedwigia
45: 41-52.
CORDA, A.K.J. 1828. Genera hepaticarum. Beitrdge zur Naturge-
schichte 12: 643-655.
DILLENIUS, J.J. 1741. Historia muscorum. Oxford.
FREY, W. & KURSCHNER, H. 1988. Bryophytes of the Arabian Penin-
sula and Socotra. Studies in Arabian bryophytes 12. Nova
Hedwigia 46: 37-120.
GEISSLER, P. & BISCHLER, H. (eds) 1990. Racimigemma to Zoopsis.
Index hepaticarum Vol. 12. J. Cramer, Berlin, Stuttgart.
GOTTSCHE, C.M., LINDENBERG. J.B.G. & NEES AB ESENBECK,
C.G. 1846. Synopsis hepaticarum. Hamburg.
GROLLE, R. 1976. Verzeichnis der Lebermoose Europas und benachbar-
ter Gebiete. Feddes Repertorium 87: 171-279.
GROLLE, R. 1983. Hepatics of Europe including the Azores. Journal of
Bryology 12: 403-459.
HASSEL DE MENENDEZ, G.G. 1963. Estudio de las Anthocerotales y
Marchantiales de la Argentina. Opera Lilloana 7: 1-297.
HUBENER, J.W.P. 1834. Hepaticologia Germanica. oder Beschreibung
der deutschen Lebermoose. Mannheim.
ISOVIITA. P. 1970. Dillenius’s Historia muscorum as the basis of hepatic
nomenclature, and S.O. Lindberg’s collection of Dillenian bryo-
phytes. Acta Botanica Fennica 89: 1-28.
JONES, E.W. 1952. African hepatics. Transactions of the British Bryo-
logical Society 2: 55-61.
JONES, E.W. & HARRINGTON, A.J. 1 983. The hepatics of Sierra Leone
and Ghana. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History),
( Botany ) 11: 215-289.
JOVET-AST, S. 1956. Trois Hepatiques marocaines. Revue bryologique
et lichenologique 25: 128-133.
JOVET-AST. S. & ZIGLIARA, M. 1967. La paroi des spores de Tar-
gionia lorbeeriana et de Targionia hypophylla : sa valeur
taxonomique. Revue bryologique et lichenologique 34: 816-821.
KASHYAP, S.R. 1914. Morphological and biological notes on new and
little known west Himalayan liverworts. New Phytologist 13:
206-226.
KRAUSS, F. 1846. Pflanzen des Cap-und Natal-Landes, gesammelt und
zusammengestellt von Dr Ferdinand Krauss. Flora 29: 129-138.
LEHMANN, J.C.G. 1832. Novarum et minus cognitarum stirpium
pugillus quartis II. Muscorum hepaticorum. Hamburg.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum. Impensis Laurentii Salvii,
Holmiae.
MAC VICAR, S.M. 1926. The student's handbook of British hepatics.
Eastbourne. Reprinted 1964.
MAGILL, R.E. & SCHELPE, E.A. 1979. The bryophytes of southern
Africa. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 43.
MICHELI, P.A. 1729. Nova plantarum genera. Florintiae.
MONTAGNE. C. 1838. Des organes males du genre Targionia
decouvertes sur une espece nouvelle du Chili. Annales des Sci-
ences naturelles. Bot. Ser. 2,9: 100-114.
MULLER, K. 1940. Beitrage zur Systematik der Lebermoose. Hedwigia
79: 72-80.
MULLER, K. 1951-1958. Die Lebermoose Europas. Kryptogamenflora
6: 416-471.
NEES AB ESENBECK, C.G. 1838. Naturgeschichte der europdischen
Lebermoose 4: 1-540.
PEROLD, S.M. 1991. Studies in the genus Riccia (Marchantiales) from
southern Africa. 22. R. rubricollis validated, typified and de-
scribed. Bothalia 21: 51-54.
PIIPPO, S. 1991. Bryophyte flora of the Huon Peninsula, Papua New
Guinea. XLIX. Targionia. Annales Botanici Fennici 28: 273-276.
SCHIER, W. 1974. Untersuchungen zur Chemotaxonomie der Mar-
chantiales. Nova Hedwigia 25: 549-566.
SCHIFFNER, V. 1893. Hepaticae (Lebermoose). Die Naturlichen
Pflanzenfamilien 1,3: 3-141.
SCHUSTER, R.M. 1992. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of North
America. Vol. 6. Chicago.
SCOTT. G.A.M. & PIKE, D.C. 1988. Targionia in Australasia. Beiheft
zur Nova Hedwigia 90: 159-162.
SERGIO, C. & QUEIROZ LOPES, A. 1972. O genero Targionia Mich,
em Portugal. Metodos estatisticos aplicados aos caracteres dis-
tintivos de Targionia hypophylla L. e Targionia lorbeeriana K.
Muller. Boletim da Sociedade Portuguesa de ciencias naturais 14:
87-105.
SIM, T.R. 1926. The Bryophyta of South Africa. Transactions of the
Royal Society of South Africa 15: 1-475.
STEPHANI, F. 1898. Species hepaticarum. Bulletin de THerbier Boissier
10: 754-799.
TAYLOR, J.. HOLLINGSWORTH, P.J. & BIGELOW, W.C. 1974. Scan-
ning electron microscopy of liverwort spores and elaters. The
Bryologist 77: 281-327.
UDAR, R. & GUPTA, A. 1983. Differentiation of the genus Targionia L.
in India. II. The east Himalayan and south Indian complex and
description of a new species of Targionia. Geophytology 13:
83-87.
VAN DEN BERGHEN. C. 1972. Hepatiques et Anthocerotees. Resultats
scientifiques de T exploration hydrobiologique du Bassin Lac
Bangweole & Luapula 8: 1-202.
VOLK, O.H. 1979. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Lebermoose (Mar-
chantiales) aus Siidwestafrika (Namibia). 1. Mitteilungen der
Botanischen Staatssammlung. Miinchen 15: 223-242.
ZAMORA, P.G., ROS, R.M. & GUERRA, J. 1990. Taxonomia numerica
en Targionia L. (Hepaticae). Anales del Jardin Botanico de Ma-
drid 46: 393^104.
ZIGLIARA, M. 1970. Le genre Targionia L. — 1. Historique. Etude du
pore epidermique. Revue biyologique et lichenologique 37: 291—
305.
*» -*■, ■
Bothalia 23,2: 223-229 (1993)
The hepatic, Jensenia spinosa (= PaUavicinia stephanii: PaUaviciniaceae), in
southern Africa
S.M. PEROLD*
Keywords: hepatic, Jensenia spinosa , Metzgeriales, PaUaviciniaceae, PaUavicinia stephanii, Pallavicinioideae, southern Africa
ABSTRACT
Recently, specimens of Jensenia spinosa (= PaUavicinia stephanii) were collected at the type locality ‘Spitskop, bei
Lydenburg', in the Transvaal. The type, which previously was the only specimen from southern Africa, is held at G. A detailed
description of J. spinosa, illustrated with photographs of the thalli and spores is presented here, since earlier descriptions are
sketchy and lack illustrations.
UITTREKSEL
Onlangs is eksemplare van Jensenia spinosa (= PaUavicinia stephanii) by die tipelokaliteit, "Spitskop, bei Lydenburg' in
Transvaal versamel. Die tipe, wat voorheen die enigste eksemplaar vanaf Suider-Afrika was, word by G gehou. 'n Beskrywing
van J. spinosa, geYllustreer met foto’s van die tallusse en spore word gegee, aangesien vroeere beskrywings onvolledig en sonder
illustrasies is.
INTRODUCTION
The subfamily Pallavicinioideae (Migula) Grolle of the
family PaUaviciniaceae Migula, order Metzgeriales, com-
prises the genera PaUavicinia and Jensenia (see below).
Jensenia Lindb. (1868) is the older name for the latter of
the two genera and had to replace Makednothallus Ver-
doom (1932) (Grolle 1964), which was based on Mittenia
Gott. (1864). This name, however, was taken up already
by Mittenia Lindb. (1863), a genus of mosses. Jensenia
was treated by Schiffner (1893) and later authors such as
Schuster & Inoue (1975); Grolle (1984); Grolle & Piippo
(1984) and Schuster (1992), not as a genus, but as a sub-
genus of PaUavicinia. It corresponds to Stephani’s (1900)
PaUavicinia sectio Dendroideae. Differences between
Jensenia and PaUavicinia are shown in Table 1.
Grolle & Piippo (1986) list several of the above dif-
ferences to demonstrate that Jensenia is a natural group
which they prefer to treat at the generic level. I have fol-
lowed them in this study even though Schuster (1992)
adopts a broadened concept of PaUavicinia to include
Jensenia because of the following: in PaUavicinia levieri
Schiffn. the androecia have scales scattered over the costal
surface in several poorly demarcated rows, i.e. more like
those in Jensenia (or Mittenia, as Schuster prefers to call
it, since Mittenia has priority at subgeneric rank). Further-
more, in the Japanese PaUavicinia longispina Steph.,
Schuster (1992) often found a basal stipe that was creeping
and rhizoidal, contrasted to an ascending (but not erect)
frond, that was 1 or 2 (very rarely 3) times dichotomous,
i.e. also as in Jensenia , as opposed to PaUavicinia which
is supposedly always prostrate and without a creeping rhi-
zome. The differences between PaUavicinia and Jensenia
are therefore not clear-cut in the above two characters,
but in the remaining ones (see Table 1), the differences
are deemed to be sufficiently marked to treat Jensenia as
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X 101. Pretoria 0001 .
MS. received: 1992-11-20.
a separate genus, rather than as a subgenus of PaUavicinia.
Six species (Grolle 1964) or seven (Engel 1990), are clas-
sified in Jensenia, which belongs to a southern and prob-
ably Gondwanaland element. Jensenia spinosa ( =
PaUavicinia stephanii ; = Makednothallus stephanii ) is the
only African representative. Initially Grolle (1965) had not
recognized the combination Makednothallus stephanii
(Jack) Schust. (Schuster 1963) and Jones (1990) made the
combination Jensenia stephanii (Jack) Jones. The type
specimen of PaUavicinia stephanii was collected by
Wilms at Spitskop, ‘bei Lydenburg', Transvaal, in 1888.
This collection is held at G. No specimens of J. spinosa
were housed at PRE, except for the recent acquisition of
a De Sloover collection from Rwanda, through the kind-
ness of Dr Riclef Grolle. Amell (1963) admits that he did
not see examples of this taxon himself, but based his de-
scription on that of Stephani. Two recent attempts were
made to collect this species again at a locality called
Spitskop, situated south of Lydenburg, but were unsuc-
cessful. Only upon coming across a copy of Wilms's
( 1898) ‘Ein botanischer Ausflug ins Boerenland’ did it be-
come clear that the Spitskop to which he referred, lay
about 50 km east of Lydenburg and 9 km south of the
present town of Sabie, which was only proclaimed later.
Fresh material of this locally scarce species was recently
collected within sight of this Spitskop, on the protected
vertical banks of a small streamlet, close to the water sur-
face. Jensenia spinosa and its spores are herewith de-
scribed in detail and illustrated with photographs, as
earlier descriptions are sketchy and not illustrated.
Jensenia spinosa (Lindenb. & Gott.) Grolle in
Grolle & Piippo in Acta Botanica Fennica 133: 65 (1986).
Symphyogyna spinosa Lindenb. & Gott. in Gott. et al .: 786 (1847).
PaUavicinia spinosa (Lindenb. & Gott.) Grolle: 268 (1979). Type: Masca-
renes. Ins. Mauritius, leg. Bory (W, lecto.).
S. serrata Mitten in Melliss: 572 (1875). Type: St Helena, leg. Melliss
(NY, holo.)
224
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
TABLE 1. — Comparison of characters of the genera Jensenia and Pallavicinia
Pallavicinia stephanii Jack in Steph.: 129 (1892). Pallavicinius
stephanii Jack in Steph.: 324 (1900). Makednothallus stephanii (Jack)
Schust.: 292 (1963). Jensenia stephanii (Jack) Jones: 15 (1990). Type:
Transvaal, Spitskop bei Lydenburg, leg. Wilms G 007994 , lecto., selected
here; Wilms G 007992, para. [Synonymy mostly fide Grolle ( 1979)].
Terricolous, on damp soil; thallose, medium-sized,
green; shoots erect, dendroid, in crowded tufts, expanded
into flabellate aerial fronds; once dichotomously branched
(Figure 3C), to several (2 — 4) times (Figure 1A). Terminal
branches generally 6 or 7(8), very rarely 11 in older
plants, up to 10 mm long and tapering distally; proximal
branches 2-5 x 1.0- 1.7 mm and 165 pm thick over costa,
apices blunt to rounded, entire or slightly notched, bearing
2-cel led slime papillae (Figure 2C); central conducting
strand visible from above (Figure 1A, B) and bifurcating
some distance below separation of branches; margins of
wings with small remote teeth in sterile plants, but with
prominent spines in male and some female plants, lacking
slime papillae, plane to undulate, bilaterally rather grad-
ually expanded. Stipe ascending, wingless and un-
branched, purplish red, basally bearing some rhizoids, ±
10 x 500 pm, with single strand below, double strand
above (Figure 1H). Rhizome horizontally creeping,
branched, dark brown, embedded in the soil, in section
(Figure ID) cortical cells with outer walls slightly thick-
ened, medullary cells thin-walled, larger, ± 45 pm wide,
central strand cells thick-walled, 7.5 pm wide. Rhizoids
mostly ventral, smooth, brownish, slightly thick-walled, ±
12.5 pm wide. Wings with forwardly directed marginal
teeth, sometimes curved and projecting at angles of 20°-
90°, low and blunt (Figure IF), or up to (3)4 or 5 cells
long, basally 2 to 4 cells wide, tapering to pointed uni-
seriate apices (Figure 2H); marginal cells from above rec-
tangular or polygonal, 30-52 x 17-25 pm (Figure IJ),
lamina! cells hexagonal, ± 70 x 30 pm (Figure IK), epi-
dermal cells above midrib rectangular, 35^47 x 20-22 pm
(Figure I L), all containing up to 9 spindle- or rod-shaped
011 bodies, finely granulose (Figure II), ± 10 pm long, as
well as numerous rounded chloroplasts, 2.5 pm wide; in
section wings unistratose along margins for 6-8 cell rows,
then 2, soon 3 cell layers deep, grading into thickened
costa (Figure 1C, E), parenchymal cells enclosed by chlo-
rophyllose epidermis above and below, colourless and
empty, rounded, up to 45 x 45 pm. Costa with central
conducting strand up to 50 x 50 pm, consisting of a group
of ±11 thick- walled and elongated, brown, sclerenchymal
cells, ± 5 pm wide, surrounded by parenchymal cells (Fig-
ure 1C, E, G).
Dioicous. Androecia above and lateral to costa, cover-
ing dorsal central parts of segments of once or twice di-
chotomously branched, backwardly arched frond (Figure
2A, B, D), margins of segments undulate, prominently
toothed (Figure 2H); antheridia numerous, not in distinct
rows but crowded together, up to 4 alongside each other,
globose (Figure 2D, E), 225 x 200 pm, yellowing with
age, in axils of and covered by apically directed, dentate
to laciniate scales (Figure 2F, G), the latter imbricate, fre-
quently connate at the bases, turning orange, laciniae up
to 400 pm long, apically uniseriate, 3 or 4(6) cell rows
wide basally, cells up to 75 x 22 pm. Gynoecia single,
dorsally situated immediately distal to a bifurcation in
lower part of frond, which when young is somewhat fun-
nel-shaped with connivent wings (Figure 3A). Involucre
cup-like, surrounding a group of archegonia (Figure 3E),
basally 4 cell layers thick in transverse section (Figure
3G), otherwise 2- or 3-layered (Figure 3F), 1300 pm high,
including laciniae 375 pm long projecting upwards from
the mouth, 2750 pm wide when opened up and spread
out. Pseudoperianth developing inside involucre after fer-
tilization, becoming cylindrical (Figure 3D) and eventu-
ally ± 4500 pm long, 3 or 4 cell layers thick, irregularly
laciniate at mouth, laciniae up to 330 pm long, uniseriate
above, 3 or 4 arising from each basal part, up to 500 x
300 pm, separated from each other by slits, sometimes
with 2-celled slime papillae at the base, outer cells hex-
agonal, ± 70 x 37 pm above, elongating to + 200 x 37
pm below. Calyptra initially enclosing capsule and seta
(Figure 3D, K), inserted into mature pseudoperianth and
basally fused with it, 2825 x 750 pm, creamish white, at
apex old archegonial neck projecting and at sides several
unfertilized archegonia (Figure 3K) as well as 4-celled
slime papillae, 67 x 15 pm, mostly 2 cell layers thick
(Figure 3L), outer cells smaller, 60-75 x 30 pm, irregu-
larly shaped, with sinuous walls. Capsule cylindrical,
1050 x 750 pm, brown, containing a mass of spores and
elaters without elaterophore, wall bistratose (Figure 31),
with outer cells up to 75 x 20 pm, lacking band-like thick-
enings (Figure 3H), eventually perforating top of calyptra
and carried aloft as seta elongates, dehiscing by 2 slits.
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
225
FIGURE 1. — Jensenia spinosa: LM photographs of thalli. A, terminal branching; B, single branch with toothed margin; C, ts. of branch showing
costa with central strand and lateral wings; D, ts. of rhizome; E, ts. of branch; F, small, remote teeth at margin; G, ts. of costa and central
strand; H. ts. of apical part of stipe with double conducting strand, note also 2-celled slime-papilla; I, cells containing oil bodies and
chloroplasts; J, cells along margin of branch; K, cells in lamina; L, dorsal cells over costa. A-C, Wilms 007994 ; D-L, Perold & Koekemoer
2923. A, x 7.5; B. x 25; C. x 125; D. H, x 50; F, x 100; G, J-L, x 250; I, x 500.
226
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
at base as in G); H, highly toothed margin of male thallus. A, B, x 1 8, C, x 250, D, x 25, E, > ’ ’ ' '
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
227
FIGURE 3. — Jensenia spinosa: LM photographs. A, female thalli with young gynoecia; B, female thallus with older gynoecia; C. female branch
with single gynoecium: D. pseudoperianth opened to show capsule sheathed in calyptra; E. involucre; F. ts. of involucre: G, ts. of base of
involucre, 4 cell layers thick; H, capsule wall cells; I, ts. of capsule wall: J, ts. of young seta; K. calyptra wall with unfertilized archegonium
still attached; L, ts. of calyptra wall. A-G, Perold & Koekemoer 2923\ H-L. De Sloover 13459. A, C, x 10: B, x 12.5; E, F. x 25: G-I, x
250; J. x 50; K, L, x 125.'
228
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
FIGURE 4. — Jensenia spinosa : SEM of spores and elater. A-D, distal face of spore; E. proximal face of spore; F, elater. A. Perold & Koekemoer
2923 ; B-F. De Sloover 13459. A, x 1255: B, x 1295; C, E, x 1215; D. x 1 193; F, x 375.
with the valves coherent. Seta before elongation and when
still enclosed by calyptra, ± 875 pm long, diameter in
section 450 jam, cortical cells 27.5-37.5 x 32.5-37.5 jam,
in ± 43 cell rows, medullary cells, 30.0-52.5 jam wide,
angular, ± nine across (Figure 3J); foot 625 pm long, nar-
rowing to a pointed base. Spores light brown, globular to
oval, 25-32 pm in diameter, ornamentation cristate with
numerous short and long, branched and unbranched, bent
or curved ridges (Figure 4A-E), in between with short
rods and dots, 2.5 pm high, expanded and flattened on
top: proximal face, besides being ornamented as described
above, also with a discrete, round area, ± 10 pm wide,
lacking ridges and with only a few granules visible (Figure
4E). Elaters light brown, tapering slightly at ends, up to
290 x 7.5 pm in the centre, 2-spiral (Figure 4F).
Besides the type locality in southern Africa (Figure 5),
./. spinosa is known elsewhere in Africa from Malawi,
Tanzania, Rwanda and Zaire, as well as from the islands
Mauritius, Reunion and St Helena (Grolle 1979), gener-
ally from high elevations. Vana et al. (1979) reported it
as Pallavicinia stephanii from Rwanda and Reunion. It is
therefore quite widespread, but scarce.
According to Grolle (1979) ./. spinosa is very similar
to the neotropical species, ./. erythropus (Gott.) Grolle;
Schuster (1992) concludes that in the description and
illustrations of J. erythropus by Hiissel de Menendez
(1961 ), the scales are scattered over the dilated sectors of
the frond segments. The only other dendroid member of
the family Pallaviciniaceae in Africa, is Symphyogyna
podophylla (Thunb.) Mont. & Nees (Perold 1993) which,
in the absence of female material, is quite difficult to dis-
tinguish from J. spinosa. Grolle (1979) gives a key to
distinguish them (on vegetative characters), in which he
draws attention to the smaller, as measured by him, 21-27
x 24—35(42) pm, inframarginal cells of the thallus wings
with the cuticle finely punctate to striate in J. spinosa ,
whereas in S. podophylla he found these cells to be larger
at 50-60(65) x 50-75 pm and the cuticle smooth. Van
der Gronde (1980), who studied the genus Jensenia in
Colombia, states that female material of Jensenia is neces-
sary to distinguish it with certainty from a dendroid Sym-
phyogyna, which has a scale-like involucre and lacks a
pseudoperianth. In Jensenia the involucre is cup-like and.
after fertilization, a long pseudoperianth develops; the lat-
ter is joined with the calyptra at the base. There are thus
three structures surrounding the sporophyte in Jensenia'.
the involucre, the pseudoperianth and the calyptra.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
RWANDA. — Parc des Volcans, 3 650 m, Vysoke sur pan rocheux
(lave), vertical moussu, De Sloover 13459 (ex Herb. Bryologicum R.
Grolle).
FIGURE 5. — Known distribution of Jensenia spinosa in southern
Africa.
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
229
TRANSVAAL. — 2530 (Lydenburg): Spitskop, bei Lydenburg, (-
BB), Wilms (G 007992, G 007994)', 9 km S of Sabie, 0.5 km N of Spitskop
Store, on road R537 from Sabie to White River, at small streamlet on left
side of road, on vertical earth bank, (-BB). Perold & Koekemoer 2923
(PRE).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I wish to express my sincere gratitude to Drs R. Grolle
and E.O. Campbell for refereeing this article and for their
helpful suggestions; also to Dr P. Geissler, curator at G
for the loan of the type specimen and to Ms M. Koeke-
moer, curator of PRE, for accompanying me and helping
me on field trips as well as for actually finding the locality
where Jensenia spinosa grows. My thanks also to Mrs A.
Romanowski, photographer, for developing and printing
the photographs (taken by the author), and to the typist.
Mrs J. Mulvenna, for her valued contribution.
REFERENCES
ARNELL, S. 1963. Hepaticae of South Africa. Swedish Natural Science
Council, Stockholm.
ENGEL. J.J. 1990. Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas). Hepaticae and
Anthocerotophyta. A taxonomic and phytogeographic study.
Fieldiana, Botany 25: 1-209.
GOTTSCHE. C.B. 1864. Hepaticae in Triana et Planchon: Prodromus
florae novo-granatensis. Annates des sciences naturelles,
Botanique, Ser. 5.1: 95-198.
GOTTSCHE. C.M., LINDENBERG, J.B.G. & NEES AB ESENBECK.
C.G. 1844—1847. Synopsis hepaticarum.
GROLLE. R. 1964. Notulae hepaticologicae. Jensenia statt Maked-
nothallus. Revue bryologique et lichenologique 33: 227-229.
GROLLE, R. 1979. Miscellanea hepaticologica 171-180. Journal of
Bryology 10: 263-272.
GROLLE, R. 1984. Miscellanea hepaticologica: 221-230. Journal of the
Hattori Botanical Laboratory 55: 501-511.
GROLLE R. & PIIPPO. S. 1984. Annotated catalogue of western
Melanesian bryophytes. 1 . Acta Botanica Fennica 125: 1-86.
GROLLE. R. & PIIPPO. S. 1986. Bryophyte flora of the Huon Peninsula,
Papua New Guinea. XVI. Acta Botanica Fennica 133: 59-79.
HASSEL DE MENENDEZ, G.G. 1961 . Las especies sudamericanas del
genero Pallavicinia. Boletin de la SociedcuJ Argentina de Bota-
nica IX: 261-282.
JACK. J.B. & STEPHANI, F. 1892. Hepaticae wallisianae. Hedwigia 31:
11-27.
JONES, E.W. 1990. African hepatics XL. An artificial key to the genera
of African hepatics. Journal of Bryology 16: 9 — 40.
LINDBERG, S.O. 1863. Mittenia Lindb. Oefversigt af K. Veten-
skapsakademiens Forhandlingar 19: 606.
LINDBERG, S.O. 1868. Musci novi scandinavici. Notiser Sdllskap pro
Fauna et Flora Fennica Forhandlingar 9: 255-299.
MELLISS, J.C. 1875. St Helena. London.
PEROLD, S.M. 1993. The hepatics, Symphyogyna podophylla and Pal-
lavicinia lyellii (Pallaviciniaceae) in southern Africa. Bothcdia 23:
15-23.
SCHIFFNER. V. 1893. Hepaticae (Lebermoose). Die Natiirlichen
Pflanzenfamilien 1,3: 3—141.
SCHUSTER. R.M. 1963. Studies on antipodal Hepaticae. 1. Annotated
keys to the genera of antipodal Hepaticae with special reference to
New Zealand and Tasmania. Journal of the Hattori Botanical
Laboratory 26: 185-309.
SCHUSTER. R.M. 1992. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of North
America Vol. 5. Field Museum of Natural History. Chicago.
SCHUSTER. R.M. & INOUE. H. 1975. Studies on Pallaviciniaceae and
Allisoniaceae (Metzgeriales) in Japan. Bulletin of the National
Science Museum. Tokyo, Ser. B, 1: 101-107.
STEPHANI, F. 1900. Pallavicinius Gray 1821. Species hepaticarum 1:
309-327.
VANA, J„ POCS, T. & DE SLOOVER, J.L. 1979. Hepatiques d’ Afrique
tropicale. Lejeunia 98: 1-23.
VAN DER GRONDE. K. 1980. Studies on Colombian Cryptogams. VDI.
Mededelingen van het Botanisch Museum en Herbarium van de
Rijksuniversiteit te Utrecht. No. 505. Botany. Proceedings C83(3):
271-278.
VERDOORN, F. 1932. De levermosgeslachten van Java en Sumatra.
Nederlandsch Kruidkundig archief, Jaargang 1931: 461-509.
WILMS. F. 1898. Ein botanischer Ausflug ins Boerenland. Ver-
handlungen des Botanischen Vereins der Provinz Brandenburg.
Vn-XXIV. Berlin.
Bothalia 23,2: 231-237(1993)
Notes on African plants
VARIOUS AUTHORS
VITACEAE
A NEW SPECIES OF RHOICISSUS FROM THE TRANSVAAL
Rhoicissus laetans Retief sp. nov., R. microphyllae
(Turcz.) Gilg & Brandt similis sed foliis ellipticis vel ob-
ovatis, glaucoviridibus, glabris, in sicco valde discolori-
bus, sine domatiis differt; R. microphyllae folia ovata vel
elliptica sunt, pilis rufis vestita, cum domatiis fasciculis
trichomatorum in axillis venarum principalium lateralium.
2 mm long, yellowish green. Stamens with filaments 1
mm long, dorsifixed, opposite petals, bending over gynoe-
cium. Disc entire, with ovary immersed in it. Style simple,
entire, 2 mm long. Stigma not broader than style. Berries
12 mm in diameter. Seed 1— 3(— 4); testa smooth, dark
brown, usually with a prominent, longitudinal furrow.
Type. — Transvaal, 2430 (Pilgrim's Rest): along Drie
Rondawels-Uitkyk road, (-DB), Herman 737 (PRE,
holo.). Figure 1.
A shrub, up to 1.5 m high, sometimes scrambling. Ten-
drils absent. Leaves simple, petiolate; lamina elliptic to
obovate, 18-50 x 10-25 mm, glabrous, net-veining prom-
inent on undersurface, margin entire, base obtuse, apex
obtuse to slightly acute, very shortly mucronate; stipules
absent; petiole up to 5 mm long. Inflorescence a leaf-
opposed cyme, tendril-like. Calyx entire. Petals 4, ovate.
TRANSVAAL. — 2430 (Pilgrim’s Rest): Blydepoort Nature Reserve,
Lowveld look-out, (-BD), Van Wyk 10233 (PRU); Farm Steenveld
229KT, kranzes overlooking Ohrigstad River, (-DA), Fourie 1316 (PRE);
along Drie Rondawels-Uitkyk road, (-DB), Herman 737 (PRE); 18.3
radial miles from Pilgrim’s Rest, banks of Blyde River, (-DB), Mogg &
Davidson 33547 (J, PRE); Blydepoort Nature Reserve, F.H. Odendaal
Rest Camp, (-DB), Van Wyk 5200 (PRE, PRU).
Rhoicissus laetans is endemic to the northeastern
Transvaal Escarpment, where it occurs in a small area
(Figure 2). The species is found in mountain grassland
with stunted shrub vegetation (North-eastern Mountain
Sourveld) or on steep, densely wooded kloof slopes with
mixed bushveld vegetation. Occasionally it occurs in riv-
erine forest. The species grows on soils derived from
quartzite and sandstone. It flowers from at least November
(probably earlier, judged by the occurrence of fruits on
specimens) till February.
Classification of the new species in the genus Rhoi-
cissus is supported by the shape of its flower buds, struc-
ture of the floral disc and inflorescence morphology. In
Rhoicissus the buds are globose in outline (Figure 3).
Flower buds of Cissus are typically conical to ovoid with
the petals cucullate at the apex, whereas those of Cy-
phostemma are cylindric or flask-shaped, constricted in
the middle and inflated at the apex (Figure 3). Flower
buds of Ampelocissus and Cayratia are also globose in
FIGURE 1 . — Holotype of Rhoicissus laetans, Herman 737 (PRE).
FIGURE 2. — Distribution of Rhoicissus laetans.
232
Bothalia 23,2 ( 1993)
FIGURE 3. — Characteristic flower bud shape in three genera of
the Vitaceae: A, Rhoicissus: B. Cissits ; C, Cyphostemma.
outline, but Ampelocissus differs from Rhoicissus in hav-
ing an inflorescence with tendrils and a floral disc with
vertical furrows. Cayratia has a thin disc and axillary
cymes, whereas in Rhoicissus the disc is annular, entire
and thick and the inflorescence is a leaf-opposed cyme.
The species of Rhoicissus usually have 5 or 6 petals
per flower. Although only 4 petals are present in R. lae-
tans and R. microphylla (as is the case in Cissus, Cypho-
stemma and Cayratia ), the prominent globose flower buds
place the species in Rhoicissus.
Rhoicissus laetans is distinguished from all the other
members of the genus by its shrubby habit and simple,
glabrous, glaucous green leaves. In southern Africa R.
tomentosa (Lam.) Wild & Drummond and R. microphylla
(Turcz.) Gilg & Brandt also have simple leaves. The
leaves of R. tomentosa are broadly transversely elliptic to
reniform and the species is a high-climbing liane. R.
microphylla , a small shrub, has ovate leaves with the un-
dersurface of the lamina covered with reddish brown
hairs. The other southern African species, namely R.
digitata (L.f.) Gilg & Brandt, R. revoilii Planch., R.
rhomboidea (E. Mey. ex Harv.) Planch., R. sessilifolia
Retief and R. tridentata (L.f.) Wild & Drummond all have
3-foliolate leaves.
FIGURE 4. — SEM micrograph of leaf undersurface: A, Rhoicissus
tuft domatia in axils of principal lateral veins, x 16.
For nearly twenty years it was thought that specimens
of R. laetans belonged to R. microphylla , a species oc-
curring only in the eastern Cape. The two taxa differ not
only in their widely disjunct distribution but R.
microphylla has ovate to elliptic leaves, with reddish hairs
and hair-tuft domatia on the undersurface (Figure 4B). R.
laetans, on the other hand, has elliptic to obovate leaves
which are glaucous green and glabrous when fresh (Figure
4A), and prominently discolorous when dried.
The geographical range of R. laetans falls within the
Wolkberg Centre of endemism, and more specifically the
Blyde Subcentre (Matthews et al. 1993; listed as
Rhoicissus sp. nov.). Other woody species endemic/near-
endemic to the Blyde Subcentre include Euclea dewinteri
Retief, Protea laetans L.E. Davidson and Combretum
petrophilum Retief. Rhoicissus laetans and its sister spe-
cies, R. microphylla, which occurs in the eastern Cape,
mirror a disjunct distribution pattern shown by a number
of other Blyde Subcentre endemics, e.g., Streptocarpus
meyeri B.L. Burtt, Cyrtanthus huttonii Baker and Hae-
manthus paucifolius Snijman & Van Wyk (Hilliard &
Burtt 1971; Dyer 1972; Reid & Dyer 1984; Snijman &
Van Wyk 1993). The repeated pattern shown by these
vicarious taxa should have value for tracing the history
and development of the southern African flora.
The specific epithet laetans refers to the area from
which the species has mainly been collected: Blydepoort
Nature Reserve, with 'bly’ meaning ‘joyful’.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author wishes to thank Drs O.A. Leistner and H.F.
Glen of the National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, and
Prof. A.E. van Wyk of the University of Pretoria, for their
assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.
REFERENCES
DYER, R.A. 1972. Cyrtanthus huttonii. The Flowering Plants of Africa
42: t. 1660.
laetans. x 35; B, R. microphylla. note scattered trichomes and hair-
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
233
HILLIARD. O.M. & BURTT. B.L. 1971. Streptocarpus: an African plant
study. University of Natal Press, Pietermaritzburg.
MATTHEWS, W.S., VAN WYK, A.E. & BREDENKAMP. G.J. [1992]
1993. Endemic flora of the northeastern Transvaal Escarpment,
South Africa. Biological Conservation 63: 83-94.
REID, C. & DYER, R.A. 1984. A review of tlte southern African
species of Cyrtanthus. American Plant Life Society, La Jolla,
California.
SNIJMAN, D.A. & VAN WYK, A.E. 1993. A new species of
Haemanthus (Amaryllidaceae) from the eastern Transvaal Es-
carpment, South Africa. South African Journal of Botany 59:
247-250.
E. RETIEF
MS. received: 1992-10-19.
CUCURBITACEAE
A NEW SPECIES OF KEDROST1S FROM THE WESTERN CAPE
Kedrostis psammophila Bmyns , sp. nov., a ceteris
speciebus capreolis destitutis, caulibus horizontalibus sub-
terraneis repentibus, receptaculo longissimo in flore
femineo cum ovario subterraneo differt. Type: South Af-
rican Cape. Nortier, Bruyns 4569 (BOL, holo.; PRE, K,
M, iso.).
Plant with carrot-shaped to cylindrical tuber up to 200
x 100 mm or more, usually at least 150 mm beneath soil
surface and pale grey-brown with white flesh, with several
smaller subsidiary tubers produced elsewhere along stems,
very strongly foetid, monoecious. Stems soft, creeping
horizontally to 1 m or more and extensively branched be-
neath soil surface, cylindrical, white; portions above
ground usually not more than 150 mm long, clustered,
horizontally spreading, bearing leaves along whole length,
grey-green, hairy. Leaves palmately 3- to 5-lobed often to
at least halfway but sometimes ± entire, 6-20 x 10-25
mm, segments irregularly dentate, almost all of equal size,
grey-green, hairy on both sides; petiole 8-15 mm long,
grooved above, setose. Tendrils and stipules none. Flow-
ers unisexual, male and female quite different and borne
separately, inflorescences arising from underground stems.
Male flowers on peduncle ± 80.0 x 1. 5-2.0 mm of which
usually 50 mm protruding from soil bearing 25 or more
flowers, green and pilose above ground, white and gla-
brous below; bracts ± 4 mm long, often with few small
teeth on margin, lanceolate, spreading; pedicel 1 2-22 mm
long, slightly over 1 mm thick; calyx green, pilose outside,
receptacle ± 4 mm long; sepals 1. 5-2.0 x± 1.5 mm, acute;
corolla lobes spreading with recurved obtuse tips, 5-7 x
3 mm at base, outside green and pilose, inside green with
darker longitudinal stripes, fine hairs, and yellow multi-
cellular short clavate papillae towards edge and apex; an-
thers 3, white, erect. ± 3 mm long, very hairy inside
around base, one small with 1 locule, two larger with 2
locules each. Female flowers on subterranean peduncle
0-20 x 1.0-1 .5 mm. bearing 1 flower and 1-2 small bracts
at apex, white, glabrous; pedicel curving downwards, ± 2
mm thick, white with few scattered hairs; calyx pale yel-
low, sparsely and finely pilose, smooth; receptacle ini-
tially horizontal then erect, cylindrical and solid, 35-70 x
2-3 mm, widening to 5-6 mm in last 5 mm, mostly sub-
terranean; sepals to 2 mm long, lanceolate; corolla lobes
10-12 x 3-4 mm, broadest just above middle, slightly
narrower at base, with rounded obtuse apex, ascending-
spreading. pale greenish and smooth outside, bright yellow
and papillate within; staminodes 0-2 per lobe (5 per
flower), pilose, erect, ± 2 mm long, inserted near base of
petals; ovary ± ovoid, horizontal, 5-7 x 4—5 mm, pale
yellow, finely papillate; style 5-7 x 1. 5-2.0 mm with
broad cauliflower-like obscurely trifid apex, fused to re-
ceptacle about 4 mm below sepals. Fruit (only 1 seen)
± spherical, 22 mm diam., finely pubescent, green where
exposed, white beneath soil. Seeds 8, white, flattened
ovoid. 10x7 mm (not yet ripe). Flowering April to June.
Figure 5.
Specimens examined
CAPE. — 2917 (Springbok): Wildeperdehoek Pass, (-DC), Bruyns
5171 (BOL); 5 km S Pass, (-DC), Bruyns 5174 (BOL). 3017 (Hon-
deklipbaai): Riethuis, (-AB), Bruyns 4593 (BOL); 7 km S Taaibosduin,
(-AD), Bruyns 4592 (BOL): NE Soebatsfontein, (-BA), Bruyns 5184
(BOL): Swartvlei. (-BD). Bruyns 5354 (BOL); Sandkraal, (-DA), H -
Taylor 1378 (BOL); Nariep, (-DC), no material deposited. 3018
(Kamiesberg): Stofkraal, (-CB), Bmyns 4712 (BOL): Kliprand, (-DA),
Bruyns 5268 (BOL). 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): Swartbooisvlei, (-AC),
Bayer 6229 (BOL); Draaihoek. (-CB), H, -Taylor 1146 (BOL). 3218
(Clanwilliam): Nortier, (-AB). Bayer (BOL); Bmyns 4569 (BOL. PRE.
K, M); Grootdrif, (-AD). Bruyns 4738 (BOL); Redelinghuys, (-BC),
Bruyns 4737 (BOL).
The Cucurbitaceae are a relatively small family in
southern Africa with eight genera and 72 species (Meeuse
1962; Gibbs Russell et al. 1987; De Wet et al. 1991). The
family is mainly found in those parts of the subcontinent
receiving summer rainfall with only about five species (of
the genera Melothria, Kedrostis and Cucumis) native to
the western Cape. Most of them are creepers or climbers,
often with a large tuberous rootstock and characteristic
cucumber- or pumpkin-like fruit.
According to the key in Meeuse (1962), the present
new species belongs to Kedrostis Medik. and is the ninth
species known in southern Africa.
K. psammophila has less of a climbing or scandent
habit than any other southern African species. The aerial
stems are short and usually prostrate. They lack tendrils,
which are found on all other southern African species of
Kedrostis. Beneath the surface the stems spread exten-
sively and are repeatedly branched so that the largest, cen-
tral tuber can be very difficult to locate. Subsidiary tubers
are sometimes found at the nodes at intervals along these
underground stems and it is from these underground stems
too that the inflorescences arise.
According to Meeuse ( 1962: 24), in Kedrostis , the male
and female flowers are often borne on separate inflores-
cences with the males usually clustered and the females
either clustered or solitary. This always appears to be the
234
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
FIGURE 5. — Kedrostis psammophila. A, part of plant showing male inflorescence with many small flowers and female inflorescence
with single flower longer and larger than male; dotted line on left indicates ground level. B, C, male flower; D, dissection of
male flower; E, dissection of top of female flower; F, dissection of inflated base of female flower showing ovules; G,
staminode from female flower showing hairs; H, hairs on edge of leaf; I, papillae on corolla surface. Scale bars: A, 10 mm;
B-F, 3 mm (at B); G, I mm; H, I, 0.5 mm.
case in K. psammophila. He found that in general the
female and male calyces and corollas are identical, but
this is not true of the new species. Here the males are
borne on a ± dense pedunculate inflorescence protruding
from the soil and they are small and green. The bright
yellow female corolla is about twice the size of the male.
It has an extremely long solid receptacle with the ovary
at its base close to the stem and well below the ground
and the corolla situated just above the surface of the soil.
This leads to the remarkable situation of the fruit devel-
oping beneath the soil and makes K. psammophila, along
with Cucumis humifructus Stent, only the second known
geocarpic cucurbit in southern Africa (Meeuse 1962: 62).
Female (lowers were found to be much rarer that male
but a few were observed on the same plants as males.
The plants are therefore generally assumed to be monoe-
cious.
I have been unable to locate any herbarium records
made prior to 1986 in any of the western Cape herbaria
and it is remarkable that this widespread and common
species has not been noticed earlier. The species was
brought to my attention by M.B. Bayer, who noticed the
unique flowering habit in plants growing wild near the
Agricultural Research Station at Nortier. It has since
turned out to be widespread in the fine reddish sand found
over most of western Namaqualand from Redelinghuys
in the south to around Port Nolloth (Figure 6). It occurs
on this sand eastwards to the foothills of the Kha-
miesberge and is also found in patches of relatively soft
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
235
FIGURE 6. — Distribution of Kedrostis psammophila.
gneissic sand (much more gravelly than the coastal sands)
higher up on the southern side of the Khamiesberge as
far east as Kliprand.
Finding fruit of this species proved difficult and 1 have
only seen one (. Bruyns 5174). This had been partially ex-
posed by erosion of the soil above it and was probably
not quite fully developed. It contained eight relatively
large seeds (some dissected ovaries contained up to 10
ovules) and was extremely smelly when opened. In fact,
when damaged all parts of the plant give off the unpleas-
ant foetid odour characteristic of Kedrostis. Meeuse men-
tions that C. humifructus is dispersed by antbears. I have,
though, noticed no particular concentrations of K.
psammophila around the groundsquirrel warrens which
are common in the sandier parts of Namaqualand and its
seeds may be dispersed by moles.
REFERENCES
DE WET, B.C., ARCHER, R„ FISH, L.. GERMISHUIZEN, G„ HER-
MAN, P.P.. JORDAAN, M„ PEROLD, S.M., REID, C„ VAN
ROOY, J., WELMAN, W.G. & GLEN, H.F. 1991. New taxa, new
records and name changes for southern African plants. Bothalia
21:211.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., WELMAN, W.G.. RETIEF, E„ IMMELMAN,
K.L., GERMISHUIZEN, G.. PIENAAR, B.J., VAN WYK. M. &
NICHOLAS, A. 1987. List of species of southern African plants.
Memoirs of the Botanical Sur\’ey of South Africa No. 56: 201-203.
MEEUSE, A.D.J 1962. The Cucurbitaceae of southern Africa. Bothalia
8: 1-111.
P. BRUYNS*
* Bolus Herbarium, Univ. of Cape Town, Private Bag, Rondebosch 7700.
MS. received: 1992-09-07.
SAPOTACEAE
A ■BEQUAERTIODENDRON' BY ANY OTHER NAME?
The taxonomy and nomenclature of the genus Be-
quaertiodendron De Wild, have caused considerable con-
troversy over the last thirty years. To complicate matters,
two recent revisions, one of Bequaertiodendron (Liben
1989) and the other of the genera of the Sapotaceae (Pen-
nington 1991), differ markedly from each other.
Chrysophyllum magalismontanum was described by
Sonder (1850) and based on Zeyher 1849 , a specimen
from the Magaliesberg. This species as well as C.
natalense Sond. and C. glomemliferum Hutch. & Dalz.
have fruit characters which separate them from the rest
of the genus. The need to recognise this group as a sep-
arate entity prompted various researchers to describe new
genera and sections in which members of the group could
be accommodated. Thus, Chrysophyllum L. sect. Zey-
herella Pierre ex Engl., Pachystela Pierre ex Engl. sect.
Zeyherella (Engl.) Lecomte, Tisserantiodoxa Aubrev. &
Pellegr., Zeyherella (Engl.) Aubrev. & Pellegr., Boivinella
Aubrev. & Pellegr. and Neoboivinella Aubrev. & Pellegr.
originated.
The genus Bequaertiodendron was established by De
Wildeman (1919) and was based on Bequaert 2483 from
the Belgian Congo. Chrysophyllum magalismontanum
Sond. was considered to be congeneric with the type spe-
cies of the genus, namely Bequaertiodendron congolense
De Wild. This meant that the concept of Bequaertioden-
dron had to be broadened, and this was done by Heine
& Hemsley in 1960, hence Bequaertiodendron De Wild,
emend. Heine & J.H. Hemsley.
The genus Englerophytum was described by Krause in
1914 and typified by Englerophytum stelechantha Krause.
It comprises five to ten poorly defined species in tropical
Africa. Bequaertiodendron was reduced to synonymy
under Englerophytum by Aubreville in 1960. However,
Heine & Hemsley (1960, 1968) did not recognise this
genus for the following reasons: the type material was
thought to have been destroyed, the diagnosis and
illustrations did not fully agree, and the genus was de-
scribed without fruits.
Liben (1989), in a revision of the West and Central
African species, concluded that the material placed in
Bequaertiodendron magalismontanum by Heine &
Hemsley (1960) could be divided into eight different spe-
cies. On the basis of macromorphological floral and seed
characters, these species were grouped into three genera,
namely Englerophytum Krause, Wildemaniodoxa Aubrev.
& Pellegr., and Zeyherella (Pierre ex Engl.) Aubrev. &
Pellegr. Liben (1989) reduced Bequaertiodendron maga-
lismontanum to synonymy under Zeyherella magalismon-
tana (Sond.) Aubrev. & Pellegr.
Steyn (1990), in an attempt to retain Bequaer-
tiodendron magalismontanum, used macromorphological
characters of female and hermaphroditic flowers from
gynodioecious populations to evaluate Liben' s concept of
B. magalismontanum sensu lato. According to Steyn
( 1990), characters which distinguish the southern African
B. magalismontanum from the tropical African material
are the presence of a stylar compitum, an ovarial nectary.
236
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
introrse apiculate stamens, or staminodes derived from
such stamens, and a tendency in female plants to increase
to ten the number of corolla lobes, of epipetalous
staminodes and of locules. It is also emphasised that the
staminal structure of southern African plants and En-
glerophytum ( sensu Liben 1989) differ considerably. In
the latter genus short filaments are united in a staminal
tube that adheres tightly to and completely covers the pis-
til and bears nonapiculate anthers.
Pennington (1991) reduced Bequaertiodendron to syn-
onymy under Englerophytum, because of the rediscovery
of authentic material of the type species of E. ste-
lechanthum (Aubreville 1971). He pointed out that closely
related species groups in Sapotaceae are often highly vari-
able in the number of their floral parts. An examination
of the Englerophytum complex throughout its range
showed that there was no clear distinction between free
stamens and those fused into a tube, but rather a range of
conditions from free, through slightly fused to completely
fused. As a whole, the complex is characterised by a ten-
dency towards fusion.
Concerning the genus Bequaertiodendron in southern
Africa, it is clear that Englerophytum is the earlier name
and Pennington’s treatment of the genus should be fol-
lowed. Nevertheless, on the basis of characters pointed
out by Steyn (1990), it is recommended that more research
should be undertaken at species level within Engle-
rophytum. The NBI agrees with Pennington’s views and
accepts the following name changes:
Englerophytum magalismontanum (Sond.) Pen-
nington, The genera of Sapotaceae: 252 (1991).
Chrysophyllum magalismontanum Sond.: 72 (1850). Pachystela
magalismontana (Sond.) Lecomte: 189 (1919). Zeyherella magalismont-
ana (Sond.) Aubrev. & Pellegr.: 37 (1958). Pouieria magalismontana
(Sond.) Meeuse: 335 (1960). Bequaertiodendron magalismontanum
(Sond.) Heine & Hemsley: 307 (1960).
Englerophytum natalense (Sond.) Pennington,
The genera of Sapotaceae: 252 (1991).
Chrysophyllum natalense Sond.: 72 (1850). Boivinella natalensis
(Sond.) Pierre ex Aubrev. & Pellegr.: 37 (1958). Neoboivinella natalensis
(Sond.) Aubrev. & Pellegr.: 23 (1959). Pouteria natalensis (Sond.)
Meeuse: 339 (1960). Bequaertiodendron natalense (Sond.) Heine &
Hemsley: 308 (1960).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Dr Donald J.B. Killick is thanked for constructive criti-
cism.
REFERENCES
AUBREVILLE. A. 1960. Notes sur les Sapotacees de l'Afrique
equatorial e. Notulae Systematicae 16: 253.
AUBREVILLE. A. 1971. Essais de geophyletique des Sapotacees 2.
Adansonia 11: 425.
AUBREVILLE, A. & PELLEGRIN. F. 1958. Rehabilitation de deux
genres de Sapotacees. Bulletin Societe botanique de France 105:
35-37.
AUBREVILLE, A. & PELLEGRIN, F. 1959. Rectification au sujet de
Sapotacees africaines. Bulletin Societe botanique de France 106:
22, 23.
DE WILDEMAN, E. 1919. Sur quelques especes congolaises de la
famille des Sapotacees. Revue Zoologique Africaine 7, Sup-
plement Botanique: 21, 22.
HEINE. H. & FIEMSLEY, J.H. 1960. Notes on African Sapotaceae II.
The genus Bequaertiodendron De Wild. Kew Bulletin 14: 304.
HEINE. H. & HEMSLEY. J.H. 1968. Sapotaceae. In E. Milne-Redhead
& R.M. Polhill, Flora of tropica! East Africa: 18-24. Whiteffiars
Press, London.
KRAUSE, K. 1914. Englerophytum , eine neue afrikanische Gattung der
Sapotaceen. Botanische Jahrbiicher fur Systematik, Pflan-
zengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 50: 343.
LECOMTE. H. 1919. Quelques Sapotacees africaines. Bulletin du Mu-
seum d'histoire naturelle 25: 189-193.
LIBEN, L. 1989. La veritable identite des genres et especes confondus
sous le nom de Bequaertiodendron magalismontanum (Sond.)
Heine & Hemsley (Sapotaceae) en Afrique centrale et oc-
cidentale. Bulletin du Jardin botanique national de Belgique 59:
151-169.
MEEUSE, A.D.J. I960. Notes on the Sapotaceae of southern Africa.
Bothalia 7: 339.
PENNINGTON. T.D. 1991. The genera of Sapotaceae. Royal Botanic
Gardens. Kew, Surrey.
SONDER. W. 1850. Beitriige zur Flora von Siidafrika. Linnaea 23: 72.
STEYN. E.M.A. 1990. Macromorphological floral characters in
Bequaetliodendrott magalismontanum: possible taxonomic sig-
nificance. South African Journal of Botany 56: 440-442.
C. L. BREDENKAMP* and G.F. SMITH*
*National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X 101 . Pretoria 0001 .
MS. received: 1993-10-05.
ASCLEPIADACEAE
VALIDATION OF THE COMBINATION ASPIDONEPSIS REENENSIS (ASCLEPIADACEAE):
THE TYPE SPECIES OF THE SUBGENUS UNGUILOBIUM
In our paper describing the new African genus As-
pidonepsis (Nicholas & Goyder 1992), the basionym of
A. reenensis was inadvertently omitted, so invalidating the
proposed combination. As this invalid combination is the
type of the proposed subgenus Unguilobium this too be-
comes invalid. The present note is intended to correct
these omissions.
Unguilobium A. Nicholas & D.J. Goyder ex A.
Nicholas & D.J. Goyder in Bothalia 22: 31, 32 (1992),
subgen. nov.
Folia ascendentia, margine manifeste revoluta. //;-
florescentia 4-11 -flora. Corolla reflexa; pagina abaxialis
pubescentia. Coronae lobi ad columnam staminalem circa
1 mm super insertionem corollae conjuncti, cucullati; ap-
pendix proximalis ad apicem deltato-falcata et apicem
styli aequans vel superans impendensque; extremum dis-
tale coronae appendice parva omatum (A. reenensis) vel
appendice carente (A. shebae ); sinus profundus rimi-
formis.
TYPUS. — Aspidonepsis reenensis (N.E. Br.) A. Nich-
olas & D.J. Goyder vide infra.
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
237
Aspidonepsis reenensis (N.E. Br.) A. Nicholas &
D.J. Goyder , comb. nov. Type: South Africa, Natal, Van
Reenen, Wood 8635 (K!, holo.; GRA!, NH!. PRE!, SAM!,
iso.)
Asclepias reenensis N.E. Br. in W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora capensis
4,1: 1131 (1909).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are most grateful to both Colin Walker of the Open
University, Milton Keynes, U.K. and Piet Vorster of the
Botany Department, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
for drawing the invalid publication of Aspidonepsis
reenensis to our attention.
REFERENCE
NICHOLAS. A. & GOYDER, D.J. 1992. Aspidonepsis (Asclepiadaceae),
a new southern African genus. Bothalia 22: 23-35.
NICHOLAS A* & GOYDER, D.J.**
* Botany Department, University of Durban-Westville, Private Bag
X54001, Durban 4000, Natal, South Africa.
** The Herbarium, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey,
TW9 3AB, England.
Bothalia 23,2: 239-263 ( 1993)
The vegetation of the southern Langeberg, Cape Province. 3. The plant
communities of the Bergfontein, Rooiwaterspruit and Phesantefontein areas
D.J. MCDONALD*
Keywords: classification, forest, fynbos, Langeberg, phytosociology
ABSTRACT
The fynbos shrubland communities of the southeastern Langeberg, Cape Province were analysed after sampling 97 quadrats
in the Bergfontein, Rooiwaterspruit (Garcia’s Forest Reserve) and Phesantefontein areas. Data were initially analysed using
TWINSPAN and the resulting classification refined using Braun-Blanquet (BB) procedures. One Afromontane forest commu-
nity and 16 fynbos communities are recognized and described. A hierarchical classification of the fynbos communities is
proposed.
UITTREKSEL
Die fynbos-struikgemeenskappe van die suidoostelike Langeberge, Kaapprovinsie, is geanaliseer. ’n Totaal van 97
monsterpersele in die Bergfontein-. Rooiwaterspruit- (Garcia Staatsbos) en Phesantefontein-gebiede is ondersoek. Data is
aanvanklik deur Twinspan geanaliseer en die resultaat d.m.v. Braun-Blanquet prosedures (BB) verfyn. Een Afro-montane
woudgemeenskap en 16 fynbosgemeenskappe word erken en beskryf. 'n Hierargiese klassifikasie van die fynbosgemeenskappe
word voorgestel.
CONTENTS
Introduction 239
Study area
Location 240
Physiography and geology 241
Soils 241
Climate 242
Methods 243
Vegetation 243
Afromontane Forest 244
Fynbos 244
1 . Erica hispidula Shrublands 244
1 . 1 Erica hispidula-Brunia alopecuroides Shrub-
lands 244
1 .2 Erica hispiduIa-Restio inconspicuus Shrub-
lands 249
1.2.1 Restio inconspicuus-Chondropetalum mu-
cronatum Shrublands 249
1 .2.2 Restio inconspicuus-Selago serrata Shrub-
lands 251
1 .2.3 Restio inconspicuus-Erica melanthera
Shrublands 252
1 .3 Erica hispidula-Tetraria bromoides
Shrublands 252
1 .3. 1 Tetraria bromoides-Berzelia galpinii
Shrublands 253
1.3.2 Tetraria bromoides-Ischyrolepis hystrix
Shrublands 253
1 .3.2.1 Ischyrolepis hystrix-Phylica rubra
Shrublands 253
1.3. 2. 2 Ischyrolepis hystrix-Phylica pinea
Shrublands 254
* Conservation Biology Research Unit, National Botanical Institute, Pri-
vate Bag X7, Claremont 7735.
MS. received: 1992-1 1-02.
1.3.3 Tetraria bromoides-Hypodiscus striatus
Shrublands 254
1.3.4 Tetraria bromoides-Protea coronata Shrub-
lands 255
1.4 Erica hispuhda-Protea nitida Shrublands .. 256
2. Erica versicolor-Agathosma ovata Shrub-
lands 257
3. Cullumia aculeata var. aculeata Shrublands . 257
3.1 Cullumia aculeata-Eeucadendron eucalyp-
tifolium Shrublands 258
3.1.1 Leucadendron eucalyptifolium-Protea ne-
riifolia Shrublands 258
3. 1 . 1 . 1 Protea neriifolia—Merxmuellera decora
Shrublands 258
3. 1 . 1 .2 Protea neriifolia-Erica articularis Shrub-
lands 258
3.1 .2 Leucadendron eucalyptifolium-Elegia fda-
cea Shrublands 259
3.2 Cullumia aculeata-Protea lorifolia Shrub-
lands 259
3.2.1 Protea lorifolia-Ficinia laciniata Shrub-
lands 260
3.2.2 Protea lorifolia-Leucospermum calligerum
Shrublands 260
Discussion and conclusions 261
Acknowledgements 262
References 262
Errata: The vegetation of the southern Langeberg,
Cape Province. 2 263
INTRODUCTION
A survey of the vegetation of the southern Langeberg
was undertaken to describe the plant communities of this
previously poorly documented mountain range. The de-
scriptions of plant communities presented here are based
on samples taken on the third of three sample transects
240
Bothalia 23.2 (1993)
FIGURE 1 . — Map of the mountains of the Fynbos Biome showing the position of the Langeberg and the location of the Bergfontein-Rooiwaterspruit-
Phesantefontein areas. B, Barrydale; C, Cape Town; G. George; H, Heidelberg; M, Mossel Bay; P, Port Elizabeth; R. Riversdale; S.
Swellendam and W, Worcester.
straddling the Langeberg at intervals between Swellendam
and the Gouritz River. Each transect is treated separately
(McDonald 1993a & b) but whereas the Marloth Nature
Reserve (MNR) and Boosmansbos Wilderness Area
(BWA) transects were more or less continuous from south
to north, the third transect is a composite of samples from
the Bergfontein area and the Rooiwaterspruit-Phe-
santefontein area (BRP) (Figure 1). This presented certain
problems with respect to data analysis and interpretation
which are discussed below.
STUDY AREA
Location
Numerous extensive wildfires have occurred on the
Langeberg between Garcia's Pass and the Gouritz River
in the past ten years (C. Martens pers. comm.). The fynbos
vegetation on this part of the Langeberg is therefore al-
most all in a juvenile phase (< 1 0 years) (Kruger 1979).
Little choice was left in finding mature fynbos along a
continuous transect for sampling vegetation on the third
transect over the southern Langeberg. A transect which
satisfied most logistic and sampling criteria was selected
in the Bergfontein area, 33° 58' S, 21° 33' E. This area
lies northeast of Riversdale, approximately midway be-
tween Garcia’s Pass and the Gouritz River and is in the
most easterly zone of the Langeberg. One negative feature
was that the vegetation at Bergfontein was seven years
old. However, despite the structural immaturity of the
fynbos communities, the vegetation was in the ‘maturing’
successional phase (Kruger 1979) with the non-ephemeral
species well established. It was therefore accepted that the
Hol istic composition would reflect the ‘mature’ phase ad-
equately and sampling could proceed.
The boundaries of the study area at Bergfontein fol-
lowed the boundary between State Forest land and private
agricultural land. The northern extreme of the designated
transect extended onto private land where the vegetation
was not disturbed by agriculture.
The Bergfontein transect followed the bridle path
(Muir 1929) and sampling was largely confined to southl-
and southwest-facing slopes east of Witelsrivier. Four
sample plots were located west of Witelsrivier opposite
the western end of Koksposberg to accommodate the
Erica hispidula-Protea nitida Shrublands not found in the
remainder of the study area.
Shortly after 74 releves had been recorded on the
southern slopes of the Bergfontein transect, a wildfire de-
stroyed all the vegetation on the transect. Therefore alter-
native sites with vegetation and habitat as similar as
possible to the vegetation on the northern slopes and high-
altitude south-facing slopes had to be found. Since no suit-
able sites were available east of Garcia’s Pass, alternative
sites were chosen west of Garcia’s Pass above Rooi-
waterspruit (high-altitude south-facing slopes) and above
Phesantefontein (north-facing slopes) 33° 57' S, 21° 9' E.
At Rooiwaterspruit, which falls within the Garcia’s
Forest Reserve, four releves (301-304) were recorded in
vegetation on the Cedarberg Formation shaleband east of
Stinkhoutbos. One plot (297) was located on the western
side of the watershed between the headwaters of
Rooiwaterspruit and Korinte River and three plots (298-
300) were located on the steep, high-altitude south-facing
slopes of the unnamed peak immediately west of Sleeping
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
241
Beauty (near trigonometric beacon 48). This latter peak
is referred to as Korinteberg.
Above Phesantefontein, eight plots (286-293) were lo-
cated in seven-year-old veld on the mid-altitude north-fac-
ing slopes east of Aasvoelkrans (Garcia's Forest Reserve)
and a further six (282-285, 295 & 296) in mature veld
(>20 years) on the lower northern foothills of the
Langeberg (Phesantefontein Farm).
Physiography and geology
Bergfontein
The south slopes of the Langeberg above Bergfontein
are not as steep as the south slopes of the range further
west. At the forefront of the mountain is Koksposberg, a
prominent, isolated, low ridge-like hill or ‘koppie’. This
hill and others similar to it, to the west and east, ranging
in altitude from 457-727 m and situated between the
Kaffirkuils and Gouritz Rivers, are the remnants of the
Peninsula Formation sandstone which is much more
prominent further west. South of Koksposberg is a
silcrete-capped mesa which supports fynbos. This area
was excluded from the study since it fell outside the south-
ern boundary of the transect and has been disturbed by
agricultural practices. Immediately north of Koksposberg
is the Cedarberg Formation shaleband which separates the
Peninsula Formation sandstone from the Nardouw Sub-
group sandstone. There is no deeply incised intennontane
valley following the shaleband as there is in other parts
of the Langeberg e.g. in BWA (McDonald 1993a). North
of the shaleband is another 'koppie', of higher altitude
than Koksposberg consisting of Nardouw Subgroup sand-
stone. Further north is Witelsberg which is a massive block
of Nardouw Subgroup sandstone with steep south and
north sides but with an expansive 'flat' top with shallow
gradient from the west to the peak at 1 166 m at the
eastern end.
Below the steep north slopes of Witelsberg is a plateau
extending from west of Witelsberg to Waboomsrivier.
North of the plateau is a dissected sandstone ridge which
gives way to arid sandstone slopes. They in turn make
contact with the Bokkeveld Group shales of the Little
Karoo.
Rooiwaterspruit and Phesantefontein
In the Garcia’s Forest Reserve west of Garcia’s Pass,
the Peninsula Formation sandstone forms massive peaks
on the southern side of the mountain range. Sleeping
Beauty (1 343 m) is the most prominent peak with
Korinteberg ( 1 330 m) to the west and lower peaks further
westwards towards Gysmanshoek. Behind the peaks lie
two incised valleys where streams have eroded the shales
of the Cedarberg Formation. North of the shaleband lies
the Nardouw Subgroup sandstone with Aasvoelkrans west
of Stinkhoutbos reaching 1 341 m and another prominent
peak east of Stinkhoutbos with a height of 1 330 m, re-
ferred to here as Phesanteberg.
Below the southern slopes of the mountain the Penin-
sula Formation sandstones make contact with silcrete-
capped plateau-like mesas which in turn are dissected by
numerous watercourses. The high northern slopes of Nar-
douw Subgroup sandstone grade at a moderate angle to
the undulating foothills at Phesantefontein. The foothills
consist of sandstone overburden and the remains of a once
extensive silcrete-capped landscape. Remnant mesas are
encountered extending well into the Little Karoo (Figure
2).
Soils
The soils of the Bergfontein and Rooiwaterspruit-
Phesantefontein areas of the Langeberg are the same as
those of the MNR and BWA (McDonald 1993a & b) at
the level of 'form' (SCWG 1991). The climate of the three
areas is similar (see below) as is the geology. Topograph-
ical variation and changes in parent material therefore ac-
count for most differences between the soils encountered
on the BRP 'transect' and those of BWA and MNR. A
description of the soil forms found on the southern
Langeberg is given in McDonald (1993a); a summary of
soil forms found on the BRP ‘transect’ follows:
Champagne Form soils are found at sites where there
is a a deep (>200 mm) accumulation of organic material.
On the BRP transect such sites are found mainly at high
altitude on cool, moist south-facing slopes e.g. on Ko-
rinteberg. These soils also occur at lower elevations often
in depressions where plant remains collect.
The catena of 'non-organic’ soils derived from sand-
stone parent material in the study area include Houwhoek,
Cartref, Glenrosa and Mispah Forms. Houwhoek and Car-
tref Form soils are closely related. The characteristics they
share are an orthic A-horizon and presence of an E-hori-
zon. They differ in that Houwhoek Form has a podzolised
B-horizon overlying saprolite, whereas Cartref Form has
a lithocutanic B-horizon. Glenrosa Form is similar to Car-
tref but lacks the eluviated E-horizon of the former.
Mispah Form in turn is similar to Glenrosa Form, but here
the orthic A-horizon overlies hard rock as opposed to the
lithocutanic B-horizon of Glenrosa Form.
FIGURE 2. — Silcrete mesas on the north flank of the Langeberg, ex-
tending into the Little Karoo, at Phesantefontein.
242
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
Clovelly Form soils which have an orthic A-horizon
over a yellow-brown apedal B-horizon are found in two
situations derived from different parent materials: 1, on
the Cedarberg Formation shale both at Bergfontein and at
Rooiwaterspruit, behind Korinteberg; and 2, where there
is accumulation of sand derived from Nardouw Subgroup
sandstones, on dry north-facing slopes where leaching is
limited.
Oakleaf Form soils which have limited extent in BWA
(McDonald 1993a) but which were not identified in MNR
occur on the lower south slopes at Bergfontein, below
Koksposberg and on the west side of Witelsrivier. These
soils which result from mixing of shale and sandstone
have an orthic A-horizon and a reddish brown neocutanic
B-horizon.
Climate
Characteristics of the climate of the BPR ‘transect1 are
similar to those described by McDonald (1993a & b) for
BWA and MNR. The southern Langeberg falls within a
uniform bioclimatic zone, transitional between the winter
rainfall region in the west and the year-round rainfall re-
gion in the east. The major climatic events which affect
the weather of the southern Cape coast and the coastal
mountains are the passage of cold fronts advancing from
west to east, coastal lows and cutoff lows (Fuggle 1981;
Van Heerden & Flurry 1987). A Walter-Lieth climate di-
agram for Riversdale (Figure 3A) gives an approximation
of the climate of the lower south slopes of the Langeberg
in the Riversdale-Gouritz River District.
Winds
The direction of surface winds affecting the southern
Langeberg is dependent on season with summer winds
blowing mainly onshore and winter winds mainly off-
shore. Calm periods occur approximately one-third of the
time in both summer and winter (Schulze 1965).
Extreme fire-hazard conditions prevail when hot, dry
berg winds occur in the southern Cape, mainly in winter
(Van Wilgen 1984). They arise from air subsiding in re-
sponse to pressure gradients between an established anti-
cyclone and an advancing depression (Fuggle 1981). The
lire which swept through the Bergfontein area in May
1991 occurred in such conditions.
Precipitation
Precipitation on the Langeberg is from rain, mist and
snow. Snowfalls occur once or twice each winter mainly
on the high peaks and ridges and do not persist. Mist is
a year-round phenomenon, usually occurring at elevations
from 1 000 m upwards. Rainfall occurs throughout the
year with peaks in autumn (April) and spring (October).
It may occur from unstable prefrontal conditions but is
most often associated with postfrontal events. Eastward-
moving cold fronts are usually followed by a ‘ridging-in’
by the South Atlantic anticyclone behind the fronts. Air
movement over the warm Agulhas Current results in on-
shore advection of cool moist air (Cowling 1984; Pres-
ton-Whyte & Tyson 1988). Orographic rain occurs when
this moist air strikes the coastal mountains.
RIVERSDALE (122 m)
FIGURE 3. — A, climate diagram for Riversdale which approximates the
climate of the lower south slopes of the Langeberg in the
Riversdale-Gouritz River District; B. monthly rainfall ( 1 984—
1991) at Waboomsrivier on the north side of Witelsberg, showing
peaks in April (autumn) and October (spring).
The high peaks in the MNR at Swellendam and in
BWA receive an estimated 1 200-1 400 mm rainfall per
annum. Proceeding eastwards, Kanetberg receives 500-
600 mm, Aasvoelkrans 600-700 mm, Korinteberg 700-
800 mm and Sleeping Beauty 800-900 mm rainfall p.a.
East of Garcia’s Pass the peaks receive from 800-900 mm
rainfall but the Bergfontein area (including Witelsberg
south slopes) is much drier, receiving 600-700 mm rain-
fall p.a. (Dent et al. 1987). This gradient is opposite to
that reflected in the mean annual rainfall for Heidelberg
(378 mm) and Riversdale (426 mm) (Rebelo et al. 1991).
The difference is attributed to the effect of orographic
rainfall on the Langeberg; the more westerly higher alti-
tude peaks receive more rainfall than the somewhat lower
eastern part of the Langeberg close to the Gouritz River.
The north slopes of Witelsberg are in a rain shadow
and are consequently much drier than the southern slopes.
The mean annual precipitation for a seven-year period
(1984—1990) at Waboomsrivier at the northern base of
Witelsberg was 496 mm (P.E. Wadman pers. comm.); sea-
sonal distribution of the rainfall is as shown in Figure 3B.
Rooiwaterspruit and Korinteberg receive a mean annual
precipitation of 700-800 mm, whereas the upper north
slopes above Phesantefontein (east of Aasvoelkrans) re-
ceive 500-600 mm and the lower north slopes 300-500
mm depending on locality (Dent et al. 1987).
Temperature
No temperature data are available for the study area;
a situation commonplace in the Cape mountains where
there are few weather stations (Bond 1981; Fuggle & Ash-
Bothalia 23,2 ( 1993)
243
ton 1979; Fuggle 1981). Extrapolation of temperature data
from lowland' weather stations to montane situations has
been done (Van Wilgen 1984) but this does not reflect the
true montane temperature regime in most cases. The clos-
est temperature recording station to the study area is at
Riversdale. Temperatures recorded here may approximate
those experienced on the lower south slopes of the
Langeberg. Therefore, if the environmental lapse rate of
0.6°C/100 m (Cowling 1984) is used to predict montane
temperatures, the high altitude south-facing slopes of
Witelsberg at 1 1 50 m are predicted to have temperatures
6.26°C lower than Riversdale at 106 m.
Solar radiation
Incoming radiation may be measured directly (Morris
1981), which is cumbersome in mountainous terrain, or
derived from sunshine duration. No data are published for
sunshine duration on the Langeberg. Bond (1981) used
Swift’s (1976) algorithm to calculate potential radiation
for a range of slopes and aspects for the 33° 30' S latitude
which is roughly equivalent to the latitude for the southern
Langeberg. Bond (1981) found that potential radiation on
the Swartberg and Outeniqua Mountains is relatively sim-
ilar on all aspects and slopes in summer, with marked
differences between north and south aspects, particularly
on steep slopes, in winter. This holds for the Langeberg
as well.
METHODS
Ninety-seven 5 x 10 m quadrats (McDonald 1983,
1988, 1993a & b; Campbell 1985; Boucher 1987) were
sampled on a 'composite transect’ over the Langeberg in
the Bergfontein. Rooiwaterspruit and Phesantefontein
areas. No stratification of the study area was undertaken
since no suitable aerial photography was available. Plots
were therefore subjectively placed at sites representative
of major landscape features and vegetation communities.
Floristic, structural and environmental data were col-
lected from each sample plot. Permanently recognizable
species were recorded using the Braun-Blanquet cover-
abundance scale (Mueller-Dombois & Ellenberg 1974;
Werger 1974; Westhoff & Van der Maarel 1973). The mid-
point of the BB values given as percentage cover is as
follows: 5 = 87.5%; 4 = 62.5%; 3 = 37.5%; 2 = 15.0%;
1 = 2.5%; + = 0. 1% ; R = value ignored. Ephemeral geo-
phytes and annuals were noted in each releve but were
not used in analyses and descriptions of communities. A
border zone of 1 .5 m from the perimeter of each plot was
searched for any species not found in the marked plot.
Species occurring outside the plot are represented by ‘O’
in the phytosociological tables. Vegetation structure was
measured by estimating the projected canopy cover and
height of the respective strata. Environmental variables re-
corded include altitude, aspect, slope, geology, soil form,
drainage and estimated soil depth. Mean annual rainfall
was estimated from isohyet maps prepared by Dent et al.
(1987).
Samples were taken only in fynbos shrubland commu-
nities. Stinkhoutbos in the Rooiwaterspruit area is a well-
developed stand of Afromontane Forest but was not
formally sampled (see below).
Two-way Indicator Species Analysis — TWINSPAN
(Hill 1979a) was used to obtain an initial tabular clas-
sification of the data. This was followed by successive
refinement of the phytosociological tables following the
Braun-Blanquet method (Mueller-Dombois & Ellenberg
1974; Werger 1974) using the PCTables programs (Bou-
cher pers. comm.). Detrended Correspondence Analysis —
DECORANA Hill 1979b) was used to assess the re-
lationship of the Erica versicolor-Agathosma ovata
Shrublands to the other shrublands in the Bergfontein area
(see below).
The plant communities are described in the order of
the proposed hierarchical classification (see above). No
syntaxonomic rank is assigned to any given community.
Structural description follows the a priori system of
Campbell et al. (1981).
The ‘relationships’ between communities described in
this study and those described in other, previous studies
of Mountain Fynbos were determined on the basis of flor-
istic (mainly) and structural similarity. The similarities
were determined from published descriptions and phyto-
sociological tables. No rigid system was applied and the
relationships serve merely as a guide for future synthesis
of fynbos communities.
VEGETATION
The primary objective of a study such as this is to
characterize the plant communities of a given area so that
they may be repeatedly identified where they occur in the
landscape. The early descriptions of the vegetation of the
southeastern Langeberg by Muir (1929) in his treatment
of the vegetation of the Riversdale area are highly infor-
mative but, apart from a broad classification, do not pro-
vide clear delineations of the fynbos communities. The
fynbos vegetation sampled on the composite BPR
‘transect’ is classified into 16 communities: 10 at Berg-
fontein, two at Rooiwaterspruit and the remaining four at
Phesantefontein. One Afromontane Forest community is
recognized. The classification of the plant communities of
the BPR transect is not complete since the scale of the
study dictated that not all communities could be exhaus-
tively sampled in the limited study area. Emphasis is on
the sclerophyllous fynbos plant communities, since com-
munities of this type make up the major part of the vege-
tation in the study area. Afromontane Forest communities
are extremely limited in extent.
The vegetation of the south slopes of the Bergfontein
area is mainly wet to mesic proteoid fynbos with a few
isolated patches of trees in protected places. These trees
such as Cunonia capensis are representative elements of
Afromontane Forest. A well-developed stand of this forest
type is located on an east-facing cliff of Perdeberg oppo-
site Witelsberg. This forest is difficult to reach and fell
outside the study area so it was not sampled. On the north-
ern extreme of the Bergfontein transect, i.e. on the lower
north slopes of Witelsberg, dry proteoid fynbos is encoun-
tered.
At Rooiwaterspruit. the south slopes also support wet
proteoid and ericaceous fynbos with one well-developed
patch of Afromontane Forest, Stinkhoutbos, in a moist
244
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
kloof or ravine. The north-facing slopes above Phe-
santefontein have mesic proteoid to dry asteraceous
fynbos communities.
During preparation of the phytosociological tables it
was initially doubted whether releves taken in mature or
senescent vegetation (sensu Kruger 1979) would be sat-
isfactorily accommodated, for reasons such as lack of dif-
ferential species and overriding dominance of tall shrubs.
It was interesting to note, however, that these releves were
appropriately placed in the tables and that they gave in-
sights into the nature of the respective communities when
they reach the mature and senescent phases (see 1.3.1 and
1.3.2. 1 below).
Afromontane Forest
The description of Afromontane Forest is confined to
the community found at Stinkhoutbos (Figure 4). No sam-
ples were taken in this forest which covers approximately
2 ha. A list of species confirms that it may be classified
as the Cunonia capensis-Platylophus trifoliatus Sub-
association (McKenzie 1978), also found in BWA (Mc-
Donald 1993a). As the colloquial name of the forest stand
suggests, the stinkwood Ocotea bullata is common and
co-dominant with Cunonia capensis and Platylophus tri-
foliatus in the canopy. Virgilia oroboides forms large trees
mainly on the forest margins. Plectranthus fruticosus is
the dominant understorey shrub.
Fynbos
1 . Erica hispidula Shrublands
The role of Erica hispidula in linking the fynbos com-
munities of the mesic to wet slopes of the southwestern
and southern Cape mountains has been indicated by Mc-
Donald (1993a & b). The south slopes of the Langeberg
at Bergfontein and Rooiwaterspruit are no exception.
Erica hispidula is found in all the fynbos communities at
Bergfontein except in the Tetraria bromoides-Phylica
FIGURE 4. — Stinkhoutbos, a patch of Afromontane Forest in a secluded
kloof at Rooiwaterspruit.
pinea Shrublands and with little occurrence in the wet
Erica hispidula-Brunia alopecuroides Shrubland sampled
on Korinteberg. The Erica hispidula-Restio inconspicuus
Shrublands include the very wet high altitude shrublands
on the south-facing slopes of the peaks, as well as shrub-
lands forming part of the mosaic of communities on the
mid and lower south-facing slopes of the Bergfontein area.
1 . 1 Erica hispidula-Brunia alopecuroides Shrublands
Differential species: Brunia alopecuroides, Erica al-
bens, E. mucronata, E. regerminans, E. transparens, Hip-
pia integrifolia, Helichrysum capense, Indigofera con-
cava, Lobelia pubescens var. rotundifolia, Restio fragilis.
Dominant species: Anthochortus crinalis, Brunia alo-
pecuroides, Spatalla parilis, Platycaulos compressus.
Structural formation: Low Closed Restioid Shrubland.
Relationships: Brunia alopecuroides-Restio bifidus
Community (Kruger 1974); Subcommunity E2 of the
Erica-Penaea Community (Glyphis et al. 1978); Restio-
Hypolaena Subcommunity (H & I) (Laidler et al. (1978);
Ericoid-Restioid Zone Fynbos (Taylor 1978); Low Nar-
row-sclerophyllous Heathland ( Kruger 1979); Simocheilus
carneus-Restio anceps Community (Bond 1981); Wet
Mountain Fynbos (Moll et al. 1984); Ruitersberg Wet Eri-
caceous Fynbos (Campbell 1985); Erica hispidula-Spa-
talla nubicola Shrublands and Restio inconspicuus-
Anthochortus crinalis Shrublands (McDonald 1993a): An-
thochortus crinalis-Erica curviflora Shrublands (McDon-
ald 1993b).
Owing to the fire in the Bergfontein area during this
survey, sampling of the vegetation of the high altitude
south-facing slopes of Witelsberg was not possible. As a
substitute, four samples (297-300) were taken on similar
slopes on Korinteberg. The community represented is
equivalent to that found on Witelsberg prior to the fire
(D.J. McDonald pers. obs.).
Moist air moving onshore from the southern Cape
coast, together with mist and stratus cloud result in high
orographic precipitation on the high altitude (above 1 000
m) south-facing slopes. The high precipitation, low tem-
perature and reduced insolation result in low rates of or-
ganic matter decay and consequent accumulation of deep
layers of peat-like material. This deep acid peat (pH 3.0
in 1 mol/1 CaCb) with underlying Peninsula Formation
sandstone, or Champagne Form soil, supports the Erica
hispidula-Brunia alopecuroides Shrublands which are
typical of these habitats (McDonald 1993a & b).
The Erica hispidula-Brunia alopecuroides Shrublands
on Korinteberg (Figure 5) are well differentiated tloristi-
cally (Table 1 ) with dense stands of mid-high Brunia alo-
pecuroides shrubs dominating the upper stratum. Spatalla
nubicola (Proteaceae), a narrow endemic, which is found
in the equivalent shrubland community in the BWA (Mc-
Donald 1993a) is replaced by the closely allied S. parilis
on Korinteberg. Anthochortus crinalis (Restionaceae), a
dense mat-res, tio, dominates the understorey.
A specimen of Erica dodii was found in plot 298 on
Korinteberg, which is the first record of this species on
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
245
TABLE 1. Phytosociological table of the Erica hispidula Shrublands on the south slopes of the Bergfontein area, southern Langeberg
246
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
TABLE 1. — Phytosociological table of the Erica hispidula Shrublands on the south slopes of the Bergfontein area,
southern Langeberg (continued)
Releve number 1 2223*2222222*2222222222*222222222222*2222222222*3333*222222*22222222222*222222*2222 1
19990*5566777*3335555777*223334445577*1144444566*0000*233335*11122222466*111224*6666 i
j 7890*8909346*1271267012*890890563457*2313489534*1234*734560*78902346212*456157*5678 j
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
247
TABLE 1. Phytosociological table of the Erica hispidula Shrublands on the south slopes of the Bergfontein area,
southern Langeberg (continued)
Re 1 eve number
2223*2222222*2222222222*222222222222*2222222222*3333*222222*22222222222*222222*2222
9990*5566777*3335555777*223334445577*1144444566*0000*233335*11122222466*111224*6666
7890*8909346*1271267012*890890563457*2313489534*1234*734560*78902346212*456157*56781
248
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
TABLE 1. Phytosociological table of the Erica hispidula Shrublands on the south slopes of the Bergfontein area,
southern Langeberg (continued)
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
249
TABLE 1. — Phytosociological table of the Erica hispidula Shrublands on the south slopes of the Bergfontein area,
southern Langeberg (continued)
the Langeberg mountain range. A small population of the
rare Langeberg endemic species Empleurum fragrans
(Rutaceae) was also located close to plot 298 but not in
the Erica hispidula-Brunia alopeciiroides Shrubland; this
represents a range extension of some 30 km east of its
previously recorded range (Williams 1984). Eeucadendron
radiation (Proteaceae), also a Langeberg endemic, is
found on rocky promontories amongst the more uniform
Erica hispidula-Brunia alopecuroides Shrubland.
FIGURE 5. — The Erica hispidula-Brunia alopecuroides Shrublands on
the high altitude south-facing slopes of Korinteberg.
1 .2 Erica hispidula-Restio inconspicuus Shrublands
This community, similar to the shrublands of the same
name in BWA, comprises most of the shrublands where
Restio inconspicuus is present. R. inconspicuus is not
found in the Erica hispidula-Bmnia alopecuroides Shrub-
lands and is sparingly present in the Tetraria bromoides-
Berzelia galpinii Shrublands (Table 2). The Erica his-
pidula-Restio inconspicuus Shrublands described here
were sampled on the southern mid- to lower slopes of
the Bergfontein area and are characterized by presence of
Agapanthus africanus, Berzelia galpinii, Nevillea sp. nov.
(Restionaceae) (newly discovered in the Bergfontein area)
amongst other species (Table 2).
Penaea cneorum subsp. ovata, Leucadendron spissi-
folium and Drosera aliceae , all species which prefer moist
slopes, occur in the Erica hispidula-Brunia alopecuroides
Shrublands and the Erica hispidula-Restio inconspicuus
Shrublands.
1.2.1 Restio inconspicuus-Chondropetalum mucrona-
tum Shrublands
Differential species: Chondropetalum mucronatum,
Chironia jasminoides.
Dominant species: Blaeria coccinea, Platycaulos com-
pressus, Restio inconspicuus.
Structural formation: Closed Graminoid Shrubland.
Relationships: Chondropetalum-Restio Tussock Marsh
(Boucher 1978); ‘Slope-type’ Restioid Marsh (Taylor
1978); Erica mollis Fynbos Community (Glyphis et al.
1978); Restio-Hypolaena Subcommunity (Laidler et al.
1978); Restiad Herblands (in part) (Kruger 1979); Sneeu-
250
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
TABLE 2.— A phytosociological table of the Cullumia aculeata var. aculeata Shrublands on the north slopes of Witelsberg (Bergfontein) and Phesantefontein, southern
Langeberg
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
251
TABLE 2, — A phytosociological table of the Cullumia aculeata var. aculeala Shrublands on the north slopes of Witelsberg (Bergfontein) and Phesantefontein , southern
kop Azonal Restioid Fynbos (Campbell 1985); Restio in-
conspicuus-Anthochortus crinalis Shrublands (McDonald
1993a); Erica hispidula-Anthochortus crinalis Shrublands
(McDonald 1993b).
Chondropetalum mucronatum is widely distributed
from the eastern Langeberg to Bainskloof and the Cape
Peninsula in marshy places (Linder 1985). In the Cape
Hangklip area Boucher (1978) records it as occurring on
mountain slopes at sites with impeded drainage irrespec-
tive of aspect or altitude. This is similarly true on the
Langeberg, however, at BWA and MNR (McDonald
1993a & b), stands of C. mucronatum are scattered and
simply form part of the vegetation mosaic on south-facing
wet slopes. At Bergfontein the distribution of C.
mucronatum is not so scattered and the species differen-
tiates a distinct community on localized seepages with a
'peaty coarse sand’ substratum as it does in the Cape
Hangklip mountains (Boucher 1978). Chironia jasmi-
noides is also characteristic of marshy places from the
southwestern Cape to the Riversdale District (Bond &
Goldblatt 1984) and at Bergfontein. is almost at the eastern
limit of its range.
At Bergfontein the Restio inconspicuus-Chondro-
petalum mucronatum Shrublands (Figure 6) occur within
an altitudinal range from 560 m to 850 m on moderate
slopes (14°-30°) with southeast- to southwest-facing as-
pects.
This community has an upper stratum dominated by
Chondropetalum mucronatum (up to 1.5 m) which
emerges above a low closed stratum (<0.5 m) where
grasses, restios and ericas are present in more or less equal
proportions. Blaeria coccinea (Ericaceae) is the dominant
shrub with Platycaulos compressus and Restio incon-
spicuus (Restionaceae) and Pentameris macrocalycina and
Pentaschistis malouinensis (Poaceae) comprising the
major part of the graminoid component. The Nevillea sp.
nov. recorded here is closely allied to the N. obtusissima
(continued)
recorded by Boucher (1978) in the Chondropetalum-
Restio Tussock Marsh of the Cape Hangklip area.
1.2.2 Restio inconspicuus-Selago serrata Shrublands
Differential species: Othonna quinquedentata, Selago
serrata, Syncarpha vestita.
Dominant species: Elegia juncea, Leucadendron spis-
sifolium, Pentameris macrocalycina, Pentaschistis malou-
inensis, Restio inconspicuus, Staberoha cernua.
Structural formation: Low Open to Closed Graminoid
Shrubland with sparse emergent shrubs.
Relationships: Tetraria thermalis-Hypodiscus aristatus
Community (Kruger 1974); Leptocarpus membranaceus
( Calopsis membranacea)-Hypodiscus aristatus Commu-
FIGURE 6. — The Restio inconspicuus-Chondropetalum mucronatum
Shrublands on southeast- to southwest-facing slopes at Bergfon-
tein.
252
Bothalia 23,2 ( 1993)
nity (McKenzie et al. 1977); Subcommunity C of the Pen-
aea-Erica Fynbos Community ( Glyphis et al. 1978); Low
Ericoid Open Heath or Open graminoid-heath (Kruger
1979); Erica viridescens-Hypodiscus aristatus Commu-
nity (Bond 1981); Nuweberg Mesic Ericaceous Fynbos
(Campbell 1985); Hvpodiscus aristatus-Berzelia interme-
dia Shrublands (McDonald 1993a).
This community (Figure 7) is found on east- to south-
west-facing rocky sites where surface rock was estimated
at 32% on average. Slope inclination ranges from 17°-37°
and the sandy Mispah Form soils (lithosols) are well
drained. In general this shrubland has a single low stratum
(<1 m) with Psoralea pinnata occasionally emergent to 2
m.
This shrubland community is poorly differentiated. It
has only three character species, Othonna quinquedentata,
Selago serrata and Syncarpha vestita which are poorly
represented. It lacks the moisture-loving species common
to communities 1.1 and 1.2.1 but has a strong graminoid
component, a characteristic which it shares with the Restio
inconspicuus-Chondropetalum mucronatum Shrubland.
Apart from the dominant species, Calopsis membvanacea
and Hvpodiscus aristatus (Restionaceae) are well repre-
sented, whereas Berzelia galpinii is not prominent. The
low cover-abundance of Berzelia galpinii is ascribed to
the shallow, rocky, well-drained nature of the soil.
1.2.3 Restio inconspicuus-Erica melanthera Shrublands
Differential species; none.
Dominant species: Berzelia galpinii, Elegia asperi-
flora, Erica cubica, Pentaschistis malouinensis, Staberoha
cemua, Tetraria flexuosa.
Structural formation: Low Closed Graminoid Shrub-
land.
FIGURE 7. — The Restio inconspicuus-Selago serrata Shrublands
found on rocky sites with east- to southwest-facing aspects above
Bergfontein.
FIGURE 8. — The Restio inconspicuus-Erica melanthera Shrublands on
grey shallow sandy lithosols at Bergfontein.
Relationships: as for 1.2.2 above but Berzelia interme-
dia-Erica melanthera Shrublands (McDonald 1993a) and
Leucadendron eucalyptifolium-Erica melanthera Shrub-
lands (McDonald 1993b).
This community (Figure 8) is found on a variety of
aspects from northeast through south to southwest. The
soils are grey sandy shallow lithosols, seldom exceeding
0.3 m and mostly <0.2 m deep. Amounts of exposed rock
range from very low to 98% with most sample sites hav-
ing 85% rock cover. Despite this, total vegetation cover
is high at 94%.
The absence of differential species in this community
is apparently related to the drainage regime. Species such
as Berzelia galpinii, Erica cubica and Elegia asperiflora
which have a strong preference for sites with impeded
drainage, although occurring in other communities, play
a dominant role here. Erica melanthera which favours
shallow sandy soils is also mainly found in these
shrublands, but this species is generally much less com-
mon than in the Hvpodiscus aristatus-Berzelia intermedia
Shrublands of BWA (McDonald 1993a).
The low stature of the community is ascribed to the
shallowness of the soil and high percentage rock cover.
It could be speculated, however, that some stands would
reach mid-high to tall stature in older vegetation.
1.3 Erica hispidula-Tetraria bromoides Shrublands
These shrublands include five distinct communities that
have T. bromoides as the common denominator. T.
bromoides (Cyperaceae) is a robust leafy sedge that is
known for its preference for heavier soils i.e. soils with
a high clay fraction, derived from shale or sandstone
(Boucher 1978; McDonald 1993a & b). Of note is the
occurrence of Penaea mucronata in these shrublands. This
species shows a distinctly different habitat preference
(lower, drier slopes) to Penaea cneorum subsp. ovata
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
253
which is found in communities of the Erica hispidula-
Restio inconspicuus Shrublands on wetter, higher slopes.
l. 3.1 Tetraria bromoides-Berzelia galpinii Shrublands
Differential species: none.
Dominant species: Erica hispidula, Leucadendron eit-
calyptifolium, Penaea mucronata, Tetraria flexuosa.
Structural formation: Low Closed Graminoid Shrub-
land with Mid-high Emergent Shrubs in some stands.
Relationships: Berzelia-Leucadendron Moist Tall Fyn-
bos (Boucher 1978); Mixed-sclerophyllous Scrub (Kruger
1979); Mangold Wet Proteoid Fynbos (Campbell 1985).
This community (Figure 9) is found on south and
southwest-facing slopes at altitudes ranging from 350-550
m. Soils are derived from sandstone of either the Peninsula
Formation or Nardouw Subgroup and are generally 0.5
m deep, with soils at some sites as shallow as 0. 1 m. The
average slope of sampled stands is 21.3° (8°-32°). Rock-
iness is generally low, with an average of 12%, but with
some sites having as much as 90% surface rock. Amount
of litter depended on the age of the stand, with the old
vegetation having an estimated 75% litter cover below the
shrub canopy.
Two of the stands sampled (releves 212 & 213) of the
community were located in vegetation estimated to be 16
years or possibly older. The remainder of the samples were
in six-year-old vegetation. The two mature stands gave a
clear indication of how the Tetraria bromoides-Berzelia
galpinii Shrublands would appear over a much wider area
when mature. In the mature state they would be classified
structurally as Tall Closed Proteoid Shrublands with a
Closed Ericoid Shrubland Understorey, in contrast with
the structural formation given above.
The Tetraria bromoides-Berzelia galpinii Shrublands
are transitional between the Erica hispidula-Restio in-
FIGURE 9. — The Tetraria bromoides-Berzelia galpinii Shrublands
found on southerly slopes with sandy soils at altitudes from
350-550 m.
conspicuus Shrublands on shallow sandy soils and the
Erica hispidula-Tetraria bromoides Shrublands on soils
with a high clay fraction derived either from shale or an
admixture of sandstone and shale. Since the Tetraria
bromoides-Berzelia galpinii Shrublands are ecotonal their
floristic composition is complex, displaying elements of
both the Erica hispidula Shrubland types given above
(Table 1).
1.3.2 Tetraria bromoides-Ischyrolepis hystrix Shrublands
The two communities found on the Cedarberg Forma-
tion shaleband, the Tetraria bromoides-Phylica rubra and
Tetraria bromoides-Knowltonia capensis Shrublands have
many species in common but also a number of differences
(discussed below). However, the absence of many species
from these communities which are otherwise generally
found in the Erica hispidula-Tetraria bromoides Shrub-
lands sets these shrublands apart. These distinctions are
ascribed to soil-related rather than climate-related factors.
1.3. 2.1 Ischyrolepis hystrix- Phylica rubra Shrublands
Differential species; Cyclopia sessiliflora, Indigofera
sarmentosa, Phylica rubra.
Dominant species: Ischyrolepis hystrix, Leucadendron
eucalyptifolium, Phylica rubra. Protea aurea, P neriifolia,
Tetraria bromoides.
Structural formation: Tall Proteoid Shrubland with
Mid-high. Mid-dense Shrub Understorey and Low Mid-
dense Graminoid Field Layer.
Relationships: Broad-sclerophyllous Scrub (Kruger
1979); Protea aurea-Pteridium aquilinum Community
(Bond 1981); Outeniqua Wet Proteoid Fynbos (Campbell
1985); Restio inconspicuus-Protea aurea Shrublands (Mc-
Donald 1993a); Cliff ortia serpyllifolia-Leucadendron eu-
calyptifolium Shrublands and Widdringtonia nodiflora-
Tetraria bromoides Shrublands (McDonald 1993b).
The Ischyrolepis hystrix-Phylica rubra Shrublands
(Figure 10) were sampled on the Cedarberg Formation
shaleband. east of Stinkhoutbos, behind Korinteberg. The
mean altitude of the sample sites (releves 301-304), which
were located relatively close to each other in mature pro-
teoid fynbos, is 824.5 m. Aspect ranged from southwest
to west on shallow (5°) to moderate (22°) slopes. The
yellow-brown sandy clay loam soils are classified as
Clovelly Form, reaching a mean depth of 0.45 m. Surface
rock cover is low, not exceeding 10% and the soils are
moderately to well drained. Litter cover is high (60-80%)
and the shrub canopy cover is closed (100%).
The age of the Ischyrolepis hystrix-Phylica rubra
Shrublands, estimated at 15 years, could be a factor in-
fluencing the difference in species composition between
this community and the closely allied but younger
Ischyrolepis hystrix-Phylica pinea Shrublands found at
Bergfontein (see below). Alternatively it may be postu-
lated that geographical separation of the two areas where
the shrublands were sampled may account for the differ-
ences between them (gamma diversity). These two
shrublands may also be interpreted as variants of a broader
shaleband community dominated by Cannomois virgata.
Erica grata, Ischyrolepis hystrix, Phylica pinea and Protea
254
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
FIGURE 10. — The Ischyrolepis hystrix-Phylica rubra Shrublands
found on the Cedarberg Formation shaleband east of Stink-
houtbos. Note the tall Protea aurea shrubs behind the figure.
aurea, since P. aurea and Tetraria bromoides dominated
shaleband shrublands have been recorded in other parts
of the Langeberg (McDonald 1993a & b). As much as
the differential species separate the above two communi-
ties from each other, absence of numerous species, the
most notable of which are Gnidia galpinii, Lanaria lanata,
Penaea mucronata and Struthiola garciana , reinforce the
distinction between the two shrublands (Table 2).
1.3. 2. 2 Ischyrolepis hystrix-Phylica pinea Shrublands
Differential species: Carpacoce spermacocea, Erica
coccinea, Knowltonia capensis, Pelargonium cordifolium,
Serruria fasciflora.
Dominant species: Cannomois virgata, Ischyrolepis
hystrix, Leucadendron eucalyptifolium , Phylica pinea.
Structural formation: Tall Mid-dense to Closed
Restioid/Proteoid Shrubland with Sparse Mid-high Shrub
Understorey and a Low Mid-dense to Closed Graminoid
Shrubland field layer.
Relationships: as for 1.3.2. 1 above.
Apart from releve 227, samples representing the
Ischyrolepis hystrix-Phylica pinea Shrublands (Figure 1 1 )
were found at altitudes from 30CM-00 m on southeast- to
southwest-facing slopes of the Cedarberg Formation
shaleband, where it traverses the Bergfontein area. Releve
227 was sampled on a shale lens on a moderate north-
west-facing slope above Rooiwaterspruit, where the soil
is a 0.3 m deep, yellow-brown loamy Clovelly Form soil.
The soils at Bergfontein were not classified except that
they were noted to have a grey-brown orthic A-horizon.
At Rooiwaterspruit, the vegetation in releve 227 was
dominated by Leucadendron eucalyptifolium in the tall
(1. 5-3.0 m) mid-dense canopy. Non-ericoid shrubs and
graminoids combined to form a closed understorey, 1.5
m high. The community represented by releve 227 is
somewhat different to the Bergfontein Community since
many of the typical shaleband-associated species are ab-
sent (Table 2). However, it is similar enough to the
Ischyrolepis hystrix-Knowltonia capensis Shrublands and
different enough from the Ischyrolepis hystrix-Phylica
rubra Shrublands for it to be included in the former. The
community at Bergfontein was dominated by the tall ( 1 .2-
5.0 m) Cannomois virgata in the canopy, with a mid-high,
mid-dense stratum dominated by Phylica pinea and Pro-
tea aurea and a low, closed stratum dominated by res-
tioids.
The Ischyrolepis hystrix-Phylica pinea Shrubland is
the only community from which Erica hispidula is totally
absent. No explanation for this can be advanced since this
species occurs in similar communities in the MNR and
BWA (McDonald 1993a & b). A combination of wetness
and shale-derived soil may account for the absence of this
species.
1.3.3 Tetraria bromoides-Hypodiscus striatus Shrublands
Differential species: Anomalanthus scoparius, Diosma
tenella, Heteropogon contortus, Hypodiscus striatus , Peu-
cedanum ferulaceum, Polygala sp.
Dominant species: Anomalanthus scoparius, Erica
hispidula, Hypodiscus striatus, Lanaria lanata, Leucaden-
dron eucalyptifolium, L. salignum, Tetraria bromoides.
Structural formation: Low Mid-dense to Closed
Graminoid Shrubland with Mid-high to Tall, Sparse to
Mid-dense Proteoid Shrubland Overstorey.
Relationships: Mixed-sclerophyllous Scrub (Kruger
1979); Protea neriifolia-Leucadendron eucalyptifolium-
Erica triceps Community (Bond 1981); Robinson Mesic
Proteoid Fynbos (Campbell 1985); Hypodiscus aristatus-
Leucadendron eucalyptifolium Shrublands (McDonald
1993a); Leucadendron eucalyptifolium-Erica melanthera
Shrublands (McDonald 1993b).
J
FIGURE 1 1 . — The Ischyrolepis hystrix-Phylica pinea on the Cedarberg
Formation shaleband in the Bergfontein area. Note the tall restio,
Cannomois virgata, characteristic of this community.
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
255
These shrublands (Figure 12) were sampled on the
north and northwest slopes of Koksposberg and on the
west-facing mid-slopes of Witelsberg, overlooking
Witelsrivier (Bergfontein area). The community occurs at
altitudes from 300-550 m on sites with shallow ( 0.2 m)
well-drained sandy loam soils, where the slopes are mod-
erate to steep ( 16°-36°) and where rock cover varies from
almost nil to 90%.
Presence of Tetraria bromoides points to soils with a
higher fertility, however, soil-vegetation relationships of
this community are not clear and require further investi-
gation. The community is clearly defined and character-
ized by differential species (Table 1) which have a
preference for stony or rocky well-drained sites. All the
differential species are also species of low stature which
are found in the understorey of mature stands of the Tetra-
ria bromoides-Hypodiscus striatus Shrublands. Ano-
malanthus scoparius (Ericaceae) grows as a prostrate
dwarf shrub covering stony soil but not over rocks (E.G.H.
Oliver pers. comm.) and the erect Hypodiscus striatus
(Restionaceae) is found as tussocks in shallow pockets of
soil. Heteropogon contortus is a subtropical C4 grass
which Bond (1981 ) recorded as differential for his Protea
nitida Community (Waboomveld) on fertile soils. At
Bergfontein, H. contortus is faithful to the Tetraria bro-
moides-Hypodiscus aristatus Shrublands and not found at
all in the Erica hispidula-Protea nitida Shrublands de-
scribed below. Diosma tenella (Rutaceae) is a shrublet
which Williams (1982) described as ‘rather rare' but hav-
ing a wide tolerance for different soil types, from shales
to sandy gravels and silcrete.
From Table 1 it is seen that there are numerous species
which, although not differential or dominant, are strongly
represented in this community: Acmadenia trigona,
Leucadendron salignum, Lanaria lanata, Penaea mucro-
nata, Staberoha cemua, Tetraria flexuosa and Rhodocoma
fruticosa.
One or two strata were found in these shrublands at
the time of sampling. One stratum was found where the
shrubs were co-dominant with the graminoid component
up to a height of 1 m. Two strata occurred where the
shrubs, mainly proteoids such as Leucadendron eu-
calyptifolium and Protea neriifolia , exceeded 1 m, forming
a sparse to mid-dense overstorey. The immaturity of the
vegetation gave a false impression of the potential struc-
ture of the community, which is predicted to become a
tall closed proteoid shrubland with a low closed ericoid
or restioid shrubland understorey when mature (as in
releves 261 & 262).
1.3.4 Tetraria bromoides-Protea coronata Shrublands
Differential species: Alepidea capensis , Erica cf. zwart-
bergense, Protea coronata.
Dominant species: Erica hispidula, Lanaria lanata,
Leucadendron eucalyptifolium, Tetraria bromoides.
Structural formation: Mid-high Closed Proteoid Shrub-
land with Low Closed Graminoid Shrubland Understorey
or a Low Closed Graminoid Shrubland with Sparse emer-
gent Proteoid shrubs.
Relationships: Broad-sclerophyllous Scrub (Kruger
1979) ; Outeniqua Wet Proteoid Fynbos (Campbell 1985);
Wet Proteoid Fynbos (Rebelo et al. 1991).
This community (Figure 13) occurs on the lower south-
east-, southwest- and west-facing slopes of Koksposberg
in the Bergfontein area. At plot 221 the soil is derived
from Cedarberg Formation shale, whereas at the remainder
of the plots (214—216 & 247) the soils are apparently de-
rived from accumulated material at the footslopes. The
soils are well-drained shallow (0. 2-0.3 m) fine-textured
grey-brown to dark brown sandy loams, with negligible
surface rock cover.
The distribution of Protea coronata is strongly related
to edaphic factors with this species favouring heavy soils
with a high clay fraction (Rourke 1980). At Bergfontein,
Protea coronata occurs on sandy loam soils but, contrary
to Rourke’s description where Protea coronata is said to
form ‘densely massed stands’, the species occurs as scat-
tered individuals. Frequent fires may have excluded P.
coronata , a reseeding proteoid, at three of the five sample
sites. Alternatively these sites may be marginally more
mesic and P. coronata, which prefers wetter sites ( Rourke
1980) , may have been outcompeted by Protea neriifolia
and Leucadendron eucalyptifolium (Table 2). Even though
the Tetraria bromoides-Protea coronata Shrubland is
poorly characterized by the differential species Alepidea
capensis. Erica cf. zwartbergense and P. coronata, it is
substantiated by absence of numerous species found in
the Tetraria bromoides-Hypodiscus striatus Shrublands on
the one hand and the Tetraria bromoides-Protea nitida
Shrublands on the other. It also has many species in com-
mon with the latter community, in particular' the ubiquitous
‘waboomveld’ species Montinia caryophyllacea and Rhus
rosmarinifolia. Helichrysum cymosum is not a true differ-
ential species of the Tetraria bromoides-Protea coronata
Community as stated by Rebelo et al. (1991) since this
species is also well represented in the more mesic Erica
FIGURE 12. — The Tetraria bromoides-Hypodiscus striatus Shrublands
on the west-facing slopes of Koksposberg with the south slopes
of Witelsberg visible behind.
256
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
FIGURE 1 3. — The Tetraria bromoides-Protea coronata Shrublands on
the lower slopes of Koksposberg, in the Bergfontein area.
hispidula-Protea nitida Shrublands which were not sam-
pled or described by these authors.
Two strata were found in these shrublands. Graminoids
are marginally more abundant than woody shrubs in the
low stratum, which was the dominant stratum when sam-
pled. In releve 247, the low stratum had been disturbed
by grazing animals. The upper stratum was dominated by
mid-high proteoid shrubs, Leucadendron eucalyptifolium
and Protea neriifolia. Following Campbell's (1985) sys-
tem, the Tetraria bromoides-Protea coronata Shrublands
would be placed in the Mesic Proteoid Subseries, how-
ever, based on lloristic composition and relationships, the
community is placed unequivocally in Wet Proteoid
Fynbos.
Aloe gracilis Haw. var. decumbens Reynolds was
found in this community and the Erica hispidula-Protea
nitida Shrublands. Reynolds (1950) gives the distribution
of this endemic variety of Aloe gracilis as from near
Garcia’s Pass westwards to Kleinberg at altitudes 272-364
m. Records of A. gracilis var. decumbens at Bergfontein
represents a range extension for this species on the
Langeberg, 30 km east of Garcia's Pass. Future searches
could reveal that it may occur further east, perhaps beyond
the Gouritz River.
1 .4 Erica hispidula-Protea nitida Shrublands
Differential species: Anthospermum aethiopicum, Ca-
lopsis filiformis, Clutia laxa, Eragrostis capensis, Erica
glandulosa, E. peltata, Pelargonium candicans, Protas-
paragus rubicundus. Protea nitida, Themeda triandra.
Dominant species: Lanaria lanata, Leucadendron sa-
lignum, Protea nitida, Restio triticeus, Themeda triandra.
Structural formation: Closed Graminoid Shrubland
with Mid-high Sparse to Open Proteoid Overstorey.
Relationships: ‘Waboomveld’ (Taylor 1963, 1978; Tay-
lor & Van der Meulen 1981); Protect arborea (P. nitida )
Pseudo-Savannah (Taylor 1969); Protea arborea-Rhus
angustifolia Community (Werger et at. 1972); Protea-
Tetraria Dry Short Fynbos (Boucher 1978); Restio gau-
dichaudianus ( Ischyrolepis gauclichaudiana )-Lobostemon
glaucophyllus Community (McKenzie etal. 1977); Protea
arborea (P nitida) Tall Broad-sclerophyllous Shrubland
or Open Shrubland with Heathland (Kruger 1979); Protea
nitida Community (Waboomveld) [Outeniqua Mountains]
& Protea nitida-Protea repens Community [Swartberg]
(Bond 1981); Protea nitida Woodland ('Waboomveld')
(Taylor 1984); Rooiberg Talus Asteraceous Fynbos
(Campbell 1985); Ischyrolepis gaudichaudiana-Myrsine
africana High Closed Shrubland (McDonald 1983, 1988).
Protea nitida is most often found on colluvial soils on
debris or talus slopes but may also be found on fine-tex-
tured soils on lower mountain slopes (Taylor 1978; Kruger
1979; R.M. Cowling pers. comm.). These soils generally
have a higher nutrient status than that of leached sandstone
soils, due to colluvial mixing of soil derived from various
parent materials such as sandstone, granite or shale. Fyn-
bos with P nitida as a prominent, if not dominant shrub
or tree, is found throughout the Fynbos Biome and ac-
cording to Taylor (1978) and Kruger (1979) characterizes
a distinct formation, 'waboomveld'. The term 'waboom-
veld’ encompasses more than one community where P.
nitida is present, but throughout the distribution range of
this species from the northwestern to the southern Cape
there is a remarkably constant group of associated species
including Anthospermum aethiopicum, Ischyrolepis gaudi-
chaudiana, Montinia caryophyllacea, Rhus rosmarinifolia
and Themeda triandra. Campbell (1985) explicitly stated
that P. nitida is diagnostic and must be present for Moun-
tain Fynbos to be classified as Talus Asteraceous Fynbos
but he also indicated that P. nitida occurs in other com-
munities as well.
At Bergfontein these shrublands (Figure 14) have ei-
ther two or three strata. P. nitida forms a sparse canopy
up to 2 m high. Where present the second stratum from
0.5-1. 2 m is dominated by Leucadendron salignum and
the low stratum 0.0-0.5 m by Themeda triandra. The
community was restricted to well-drained east-facing
slopes above Witelsrivier, directly opposite the west-fac-
ing slopes of Koksposberg where the closely related Tetra-
ria bromoides-Protea coronata Shrublands occur. The
altitude at which these shrublands are found ranges from
300-350 m with the slopes averaging 19°. Annual precip-
itation is estimated at 600-700 mm (Dent et al. 1987).
The soils with pH 4.9 (n = 3) are a shallow (0.2 m) well-
drained mix of sandstone debris from the Peninsula For-
mation sandstone and Cedarberg Formation shale. They
are classified as Oakleaf Form soils. Rock cover ranges
from 10-40%.
Apparently the Erica hispidula-Protea nitida Shrub-
lands at Bergfontein are not burnt often, so the composi-
tion of the understorey is not attributed to regular fires or
other disturbances. The grassy understorey is rather attrib-
uted to soil factors since the grasses in the community are
C4 grasses which show preference for more fertile soils
(Bond 1981; Cowling 1983a & b; Linder 1989). This
community qualifies for inclusion in Campbell’s (1985)
Rooiberg Talus Asteraceous Fynbos on the basis of pres-
ence of Protect nitida and 20 % grass cover. However,
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
257
the lack of asteraceous ‘elytropappoid' species and the
high grass cover (70%) indicate closer affinities to Grassy
Fynbos ( sensu Cowling & Holmes 1992).
A stand of tall P. nitida with an understorey composed
almost entirely of grasses was located on deep sandy soils
on the plateau below the upper north slopes of Witelsberg.
This community was not sampled but was observed to be
quite different in structure and composition from the Erica
hispidula-Protea nitida Shrublands. Further investigation,
not possible in this study due to the fire, would be required
to clarify the relationships.
2. Erica versicolor-Agathosma ovata Shrublands
Differential species: Adromischus triflorus, Agathosma
ovata, Centella virgata var. congesta, Crassula atropur-
purea var. atropurpurea, C. muscosa, C. rupestris, Cras-
sula sp. (unidentified). Erica tenuis, Ficinia elongata,
Lampranthus deltoides, Lobelia pubescens var. pubescens,
Senecio aizoides.
Dominant species: Agathosma ovata, Ehrharta ramosa,
Erica melanthera, E. versicolor, Phylica puipurea var.
floccosa.
Structural formation: Sparse to Open Low Graminoid
Shrtibland.
Relationships: unclear.
The estimated annual precipitation for Koksposberg is
500-600 mm (Dent et al. 1977). However, the north-fac-
ing slopes are in a rain shadow as well as being equatori-
ally oriented. They are therefore hot and dry and probably
receive much less rainfall than the above estimate. A sim-
ilar situation also exists on the upper north-facing slopes
of Witelsberg. These dry. rocky slopes (Figure 15) with
high incoming radiation host the Erica versicolor-
Agathosma ovata Shrublands. The soils are lithosols
(Mispah Form), are shallow and acid (pH 3.4 in 1 mol/l
CaCb) and consist merely of accumulated sand and or-
ganic material in shallow depressions amongst the rocks.
FIGURE 14. — The Erica hispidula-Protea nitida Shrublands on the
east-facing slopes, west of Bergfontein, above Witelsrivier.
FIGURE 15. — The Erica versicolor-Agathosma ovata Shrublands
found on the rocky north slopes of Koksposberg and Witelsberg.
The parent rock of Koksposberg is Peninsula Formation
sandstone and rock cover is 90% in the four releves (208—
211) representing this community. On Koksposberg the
community is found at altitudes from 550-606 m on
slopes varying from almost Hat (7°) on the ridge to mod-
erately steep (18°) on the north face. On Witelsberg, con-
sisting of Nardouw Subgroup sandstone, the community
is found from 788 m to 1 090 m.
Two strata are present in the Erica versicolor-Aga-
thosma ovata Shrublands. The upper stratum is from 0.5-
1.2 m and is dominated by the shrubby Erica versicolor.
The lower stratum where shrubs and graminoids are co-
dominant is from 0-0.5 m. Dominant species in this stra-
tum are Ehrharta ramosa and Erica melanthera. However,
the prevalence of succulent species in the genera Ad-
romischus, Aloe, Crassula, Lampranthus and Senecio
which prefer dry, rocky sites gives this community its
character and sets it apart from all other communities de-
scribed for the Bergfontein area (releves not included in
Table 1 or Table 2). A. ovata also favours a dry, rocky
habitat as does Oldenburgia paradoxa which grows in
rock crevices forming large, compact, rounded masses of
short shoots.
A detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) (Hill
1979b) of the Bergfontein data showed a clear distinction
between the Erica versicolor-Agathosma ovata Shrubland
and the other shrublands. DCA Axis I represented a mois-
ture gradient and the Erica versicolor-Agathosma ovata
Shrublands are towards the drier end of the gradient. DCA
Axis II apparently represented a soil depth/rockiness gra-
dient, showing that the community inhabits the rockiest
sites with shallowest soils in the study area.
3. Cullumia aculeata var. aculeata Shrublands
The Cullumia aculeata Shrublands include the non-
Erica hispidula shrublands represented by Table 2. All
these shrublands are on the northern slopes of the
258
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
Langeberg range adjacent to the Little Karoo. Most of the
samples were taken in the Phesantefontein area; the ex-
ceptions are releves 278-281 which were recorded on the
north slopes of Witelsberg before the May 1 99 1 fire.
3.1 Cullwnia aculeata-Leucadendron eucalyptifolium
Shrublands
This community is found on the mid- to upper slopes
immediately east of Aasvoelkrans. They are mesic pro-
teoid shrublands and are separated into three distinct com-
munities with Leucadendron eucalyptifolium as the
common factor.
3.1.1 Leucadendron eucalyptifolium-Protea neriifolia
Shrublands
Two communities are found in the Leucadendron eu-
calyptifolium-Protea neriifolia Shrublands. P neriifolia
links these shrublands, setting them apart from the
Leucadendron eucalyptifoliutn-Elegia filacea Shrublands
where P. neriifolia is absent. These shrublands have affi-
nity to the Tetraria bromoides-Hypodiscus striatus Shrub-
lands found on the southern slopes at Bergfontein with
Anomalanthus scoparius and Hypodiscus striatus , differ-
ential species of the latter community, being found here
as well.
3. 1 . 1 . 1 Protea neriifolia-Merxmuellera decora Shrub-
lands
Differential species: Ficinia trichodes, Ischyrolepis sp.,
Merxmuellera decora.
Dominant species: Hypodiscus argenteus, Lanaria la-
nata, Merxmuellera decora.
Structural formation: Mid-high Closed Graminoid
Shrubland.
Relationships: Proteoid Zone Fynbos (Taylor 1978);
Broad sclerophyllous- Scrub or Open Scrub (Kruger
1979); Sanddrift Mesic Proteoid Fynbos (Campbell 1985);
affinities with Tetraria bromoides-Hypodiscus striatus
Shrublands and Tetraria bromoides-Protea coronata
Shrublands described above.
This community (Figure 16) is represented by five
releves (286-290) at altitudes from 630-850 m on the
northeast- to northwest-facing slopes east of Aasvoelkrans.
These slopes are moderate, with shallow ( 0.2 m), yel-
low-brown sandy loam soil, classified as Glenrosa Form.
The parent material of the soil is taken to be Nardouw
Subgroup sandstone, but the heavy nature of the soil
(releves 286-289) suggests a high clay fraction possibly
derived from a clay lens or local exposure of the
Cedarberg Formation shale. This requires verification but
the vegetation reflects a soil with a relatively higher nu-
trient status (see below). Surface rock cover is low to
moderate (3^40%) except in releve 290 which is different
from the other samples. It was located on a rocky sand-
stone outcrop with 95% rock cover. The soil is of the
Mispah Form, but the Holistic composition of the releve
places it in the Protea neriifolia-Merxmuellera decora
Shrublands.
At the time of sampling, the vegetation was seven years
old. Depending on the site, the community had one or
two strata,' with height not exceeding 1 .2 m. The shrubland
was thus classified as above, a Mid-high Closed Gra-
minoid Shrubland, but it is predicted that with time the
community would mature to a Tall Closed Proteoid Shrub-
land with a Graminoid Understorey.
The Protea neriifolia-Merxmuellera decora Shrub-
lands are poorly differentiated from the closely allied Pro-
tea neriifolia-Erica articularis Shrublands based on the
differential species of the first community. Merxmuellera
decora presents problems with identification in mature
vegetation since it usually flowers only in the immediate
post-fire phase; Ischyrolepis sp. (Table 2) was not identi-
fied and Ficinia trichodes was poorly represented. Ab-
sence of the differential species of the latter community
from the Protea neriifolia-Merxmuellera decora Shrub-
lands provides a sounder basis for the separation of the
two communities.
3. 1 .1.2 Protea neriifolia-Erica articularis Shrublands
Differential species: Aristea racemosa, Cassytha cilio-
lata, Coelidium cymbifolium, Erica articularis, Euryops
abrotanifolius, Ischyrolepis sieberi, Zygophyllum fulvum.
Dominant species: Ceratocaryum decipiens, Elegia
galpinii, Leucadendron salignum, Staberoha cernua.
Structural formation: Low Closed Herbland or Low
Mid-dense to Closed Graminoid Shrubland.
Relationships: Proteoid Zone Fynbos (Taylor 1978);
Broad-sclerophyllous Scrub or Open Scrub (Kruger
1979); Elegia galpinii-Metalasia pulcherrima Commu-
nity (Outeniqua Mountains) and Protect repens-Protea
lorifolia-Hypodiscus striatus Community (Swartberg)
(Bond 1981); Mesic Mountain Fynbos (Moll et al. 1984);
Thomas Dry Proteoid Fynbos (Campbell 1985). Leu-
cadendron eucalyptifolium-Staberoha cernua Shrublands
(McDonald 1993a).
FIGURE 1 6. — The Protect neriifolia-Merxmuellera decora Shrublands
found on the northeast- to northwest-facing slopes east of
Aasvoelkrans, above Phesantefontein.
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
259
This community (Figure 17) occurs on the same north-
facing slopes as the Protea neriifolia-Merxmuellera
decora Shrublands but at lower altitudes (590-630 m).
The shallow (0.2— 0.3 m), light grey-brown soils were clas-
sified as Glenrosa Form (releves 291-293) and Mispah
Form (releve 294). All the releves were situated on shal-
low slopes (9°-14°), between rock outcrops, where rock
cover was very low except in releve 294 where it was
estimated at 20%.
The differential species of the Protea neriifolia-Erica
articularis Shrublands are not constant throughout the
community, nor do they have high cover-abundance. Of
these species, Erica articularis and Ischyrolepis sieberi
have highest cover-abundance whereas the remaining spe-
cies are rare (Table 2). The very rare legume, Coelidium
cymbifolium , previously known from only two collections,
Muir’s type collection and a collection of Middlemost
(Granby 1980), was found in releves 293 and 294 and
appears to be narrowly endemic to this community. Protea
aspera , a prostrate rhizomatous shrublet. was also re-
corded in this community and the Leucadendron eu-
calyptifolium-Elegia filacea Shrublands (see below and
Table 2). This species is best known from Onrust to
Bredasdorp but has also been recorded from an isolated
population in the Langkloof, east of Garcia's Pass (Rourke
1980). Records of Protea aspera at Phesantefontein rep-
resent an extension of the range of the Langkloof popu-
lation 5 km west of Garcia's Pass.
The Protea neriifolia-Erica articularis Shrublands are
dominated by restios such as Ceratocaryum decipiens,
Elegia galpinii, Mastersiellci purpurea, Restio filifonnis,
Thamnochortus ellipticus and Staberoha cernua, all spe-
cies preferring ntesic to dry habitats. T. ellipticus was orig-
inally collected by Muir in the Phesantefontein area and
is only known from this, the type locality (Linder 1985).
3.1.2 Leucadendron eucalyptifolium-Elegia filacea
Shrublands
Differential species: Calopsis filifonnis, Elegia filacea,
Hypodiscus laevigatas.
Dominant species: Elegia filacea, Protea repens.
Structural formation: Low Closed Graminoid (Res-
tioid/Cyperoid) Shrubland with Tall Open Proteoid Over-
storey.
Relationships: as for 3. 1.1. 2 above and Leucadendron
eucalyptifolium-Protea lorifolia Shrublands (McDonald
1993a).
Two releves, 295 and 296, represent this community
(Figure 18). It is found below the Leucadendron euca-
lyptifolium-Erica articularis Shrublands, and is floristi-
cally transitional between them and the C. aculeata-
Protea lorifolia Shrublands. Both releves were at 530 m
on slopes with a shallow gradient. The soil which is 0.25-
0.3 m deep is a light grey sandy loam with quartz pebbles
and gravel on the surface. Rock cover is nil and the soils
are classified as Glenrosa Form.
Elegia filacea is most often found on accumulated sand
and the sandy nature of the soil accounts for its presence
here. In this community it dominates the understorey in
FIGURE 17. — The Protea neriifolia-Erica articularis Shrublands on
the lower north-facing slopes above Phesantefontein.
which grasses are absent and sedges few, mainly of the
genus Ficinia. Low shrubs play a subordinate role in the
understorey composition, but the presence of Protea as-
pera., which also favours sandy soil, should be noted. The
upper (tall) stratum is composed of proteoid shrubs with
Protect repens dominant.
The rare, endemic Erica rhodantha Guth. & Bol. was
found in this community. This species is apparently re-
stricted to the fynbos shrublands of the lower north slopes
of the Langeberg in the region of Garcia's Pass. Few col-
lections of this species have been made (E.G.H. Oliver
pers. comm.).
The Leucadendron eucalyptifolium-Elegia filacea
Shrublands are the same as the Leucadendron euca-
lyptifolium-Protea lorifolia Shrublands described from
BWA (McDonald 1993a), but for the purposes of this
paper are treated as slightly different. The difference is
based on the presence of Calopsis filifonnis, Hypodiscus
laevigatas. Protea aspera and Thamnochortus ellipticus
at Phesantefontein and not at BWA.
3.2 Cullumia aculeata-Protea lorifolia Shrublands
This community, found at the driest extreme of the
south-north climatic gradient of the Langeberg, is div ided
into two: the Protea lorifolia-Ficinia laciniata Shrublands
(which fall within the Leucadendron eucalyptifolium-Pro-
tea lorifolia Shrublands of the BWA) and the Protect
lorifolia-Leucospermum calligerum Shrublands (which
are equivalent to the Passerina obtusifolia-Leucospermum
calligerum Shrublands at BWA). The Cannomois pan’if-
lora-Passerina obtusifolia Shrublands found at BWA
(McDonald 1993a) were not identified as a separate com-
munity at Phesantefontein but as part of the Passerina
obtusifolia-Leucospennum calligerum Shrublands.
260
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
FIGURE 18. — The Leucadendron eucalyptifolium-Elegia filacea
Shrublands.
3.2.1 Protect lorifolia-Ficinia laciniata Shrublands
Differential species: Cannomois parviflora, Dodonaea
angustifolia , Ficinia laciniata , Gnidia francisci, Linum
gracile, Othonna sp., Polygala refracta, Siphocodon cf.
spartioides, Syncarpha milleflora, iWesium subnudum.
Dominant species: Leucadendron salignum, Penta-
schistis colorata, Hypodiscus aristatus, Tetraria ustulata.
Structural formation: Low Mid-dense Sedgeland or
Graminoid Shrubland with Mid-high Sparse Proteoid
Shrubs in some stands.
Relationships: Proteoid Zone Fynbos (Taylor 1978);
Broad-sclerophyllous Scrub or Open Scrub (Kruger
1979); Elegia galpinii-Metalasia pulcherrima Commu-
nity (Outeniqua Mountains) and Protea repens-Protea
lorifolia-Hypodiscus striatus Community (Swartberg)
(Bond 1981); Mesic Mountain Fynbos (Moll et al. 1984);
Thomas Dry Proteoid Fynbos (Campbell 1985); Leu-
cadendron eucalyptifolium-Protea lorifolia Shrublands
(McDonald 1993a).
This community was not found or sampled at Phe-
santefontein. The four releves (278-281) representing the
Protect lorifolia-Ficinia laciniata Shrublands were situ-
ated on the moderately steep, rocky, north-facing slopes
of Witelsberg on the Bergfontein transect at altitudes from
545-730 m. The soils are shallow (0.1-0.15 m) sandy
Mispah Form lithosols and surface exposure of rock was
estimated to be 91% on average.
This community is well differentiated from the other
shrublands represented in Table 2. This could be ascribed
either to geographical separation of these releves from the
Phesantefontein area or to the habitat where this shrubland
occurs not being present or not sampled at Phesantefon-
tein. Topographically, in rockiness and in climatic regime,
the north-facing slopes of Witelsberg closely resemble the
north-facing slopes of Deception Ridge in BWA (McDon-
ald 1993a). At Phesantefontein, however, moderately
steep, rocky, well-drained slopes of the same type are ab-
sent. The "habitat explanation’ for the absence of this com-
munity at Phesantefontein therefore seems the most
plausible.
Leucadendron salignum , Hypodiscus aristatus, Pen-
taschistis colorata and Tetraria ustulata dominate the
community at this early stage of its development (6 years
old), forming a low, mid-dense graminoid shrubland. As
these shrublands mature it is predicted that the proteoid
shrubs, Protea lorifolia and Protea repens will form a
mid-high to tall, open to mid-dense overstorey.
3.2.2 Protea lorifolia-Leucospermum calligerunt
Shrublands
Differential species: Adrontischus triflorus, Anthosper-
mum spathulatum, Calopsis rigida, C. marlothii, Cliffortia
pitlchella, Clutia laxa, Cytnbopogon marginatus, Hennan-
nia odorata, Heterolepis sp. nov., Lightfootia rigida,
Machairophyllum cookii, Metalasia massonii, Montinia
caryophyllacea, Passerina obtusifolia, Pentaschistis ma-
louinensis, Phylica purpurea, Thcunnochortus karooica.
Dominant species: Elegia galpinii, Leucosperntum
calligerunt, Thoracospernta galpinii, Willdenowia bolusii.
Structural formation: Low to Mid-high Mid-dense
Graminoid Shrubland with Sparse emergent Proteoid
Shrubs in some stands.
Relationships: Arid Fynbos (Taylor 1978; Kruger
1979); Phylica axillaris-Felicia filifolia Community (Out-
eniqua Mountains) and Passerina obtusifolia-Felicici fili-
folia-Pentaschistis eriostoma Community (Swartberg)
(Bond 1981); Dry Mountain Fynbos (Moll et al. 1984);
Sebrafontein Dry Asteraceous Fynbos (Campbell 1985);
Dry Proteoid Fynbos (Rebelo et al. 1991); Passerina ob-
tusifolia-Leucospermum calligerunt Shrublands (McDon-
ald 1993a); Leucadendron eucalyptifolium-Hypodiscus
argenteus Shrublands in part (McDonald 1993b).
This community (Figure 19) is found on the low, arid
northern foothills of Phesantefontein at altitudes from
450-520 m. The slope varies from almost level (5°) to
14° and the soils are mostly shallow ( <0. 1 m), well-
drained, rocky (75-98%) Mispah Form soils. The excep-
tion is the Glenrosa Form soil of releve 285 which is 0.25
m deep with an estimated surface rock cover of only 3%!
Releve 283 was situated on a rocky outcrop and was the
only site where Passerina obtusifolia was recorded. The
silcrete-capped mesas at Phesantefontein present a similar
substratum and habitat to that found in releve 283 and
therefore, although these mesas were not sampled, it is
predicted that they will support shrublands of the Protea
lorifolia-Leucospermum calligerunt type (Phesantefon-
tein) or the Cannomois parviflora-Passerina obtusifolia
type (Witbooisrivier; McDonald 1993a).
These shrublands are well defined with numerous dif-
ferential species. Heterolepis sp. nov. (as yet undescribed),
the succulent Machairophyllum cookii (Mesembryan-
themaceae) and Thamnochortus karooica are endemic to
this community. Species with single occurrences have
been retained in Table 2 specifically for this community,
for the sake of completeness. They are, however, not truly
differential.
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
261
Leucospennum saxatile which is endemic to the Arid
Fynbos east of Garcia’s Pass (Rourke 1972) was noted in
this community on the northern footslopes of Witelsberg
prior to the May 1991 fire. Serruria balanocephala
Rourke ined. found in this community at Witbooisrivier
(McDonald 1993a) has not been found at Phesantefontein
nor further east. Leucospennum embescens recorded from
Springfontein immediately west and at Garcia’s Pass di-
rectly east of Phesantefontein was also not encountered at
the latter locality and is apparently also not found much
further east than Garcia’s Pass.
Owing to the extensive fires on the Langeberg east of
Garcia’s Pass in the recent past, much of the vegetation
on the lower northern slopes of the range is immature and
thus not suitable for sampling. However, it can be confi-
dently stated that the community named the Passerina
obtusifolia-Leucospennum calligerum Shrublands (Mc-
Donald 1993a) and the Protect lorifolia-Leucospermum
calligerum Shrublands (this paper) extend along the base
of the Langeberg from Barrydale to the Gouritz River,
fringing the Little Karoo.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
The hierarchical classification and description of the
fynbos communities of the Bergfontein and Rooi-
waterspruit-Phesantefontein areas satisfies the primary ob-
jective of the study. It also provides a framework which,
together with differential species for each community, is
a starting point for describing the communities over a
wider area on the southeastern Langeberg. Further sam-
pling in other areas would serve to test this classification
and would most likely identify additional communities.
From the perspective of management of the fynbos of
the Langeberg mountain catchments, this classification is
perhaps too detailed and, as may be argued, too floristi-
cally orientated. However, it is important to be able to
FIGURE 19. — The Protea lorifolia-Leucospermum calligerum Shrub-
lands found on the flow, arid foothills of the Phesantefontein
area.
classify plant communities at all stages of the succession.
This has raised much debate (Cowling & Holmes 1992)
and it has been generally concluded that when applying
structural classifications it is only possible to satisfactorily
classify mature fynbos plant communities (Campbell
1985). Finding stands of mature fynbos (> 10 years old)
is becoming increasingly difficult (Campbell 1985; this
study) so applying structural classifications becomes
equally difficult. Despite the complexity of the vegetation
in this study, the successful hierarchical classification of
the mainly immature fynbos, and the determination of
character species for communities highlights a major ad-
vantage in using the floristic classification approach. If
suitably interpreted, by using the character species for dif-
ferent communities, the complex taxonomy of the fynbos
need not be the reputed daunting obstacle for managers
of fynbos vegetation (Bond 1981).
In general, the communities described for the Bergfont-
ein and Rooiwaterspruit-Phesantefontein areas are similar
to those described by McDonald (1993a & b) for the
Boosmansbos Wilderness Area and the Marloth Nature
Reserve. Degree of difference or conversely, similarity of
the fynbos communities of the southern Langeberg, which
is beyond the scope of this paper, can now be assessed.
A proposed synthesis is now possible which is aimed at
being generally applicable in the Langeberg fynbos
shrublands, and hopefully beneficial to the conservation
and management of these shrublands.
Apart from the purely descriptive reference to environ-
mental conditions pertaining to each community, little in-
dication is given of environmental variables as the causal
agents of species distribution and species composition of
communities. This forms a separate aspect to the study of
the Langeberg vegetation and will be reported separately
(McDonald unpublished data).
The Erica versicolor-Agathosma ovata Shrubland
found on Koksposberg does not fit well within the hier-
archy of communities. This was evident in both the phy-
tosociological tables and the ordination of the data. Many
of the fynbos species found generally on the south slopes
of the Bergfontein area are found in this community but
the succulent differential species indicate an azonal xeric
community. A clear definition of this community and its
relationships to other fynbos vegetation will only be pos-
sible given additional samples. It is predicted to occur on
the sandstone outliers of the Langeberg east of Garcia's
Pass as described and possibly on the Aasvogelberg near
Albertinia.
Garcia’s Pass has historically given ready access to the
Muiskraal area at its northern entrance. It has thus been
an area much visited by botanists since the time of
Thunberg and Masson in the late 1700’s. Many collections
of Langeberg north slope endemic species have Muiskraal
as the type locality, notably many of Muir's collections.
Many of these species are considered rare. Some of these
species such as Coelidium cymbifolium and Erica rho-
dantha have been found in this survey at Phesantefontein
which lies just west of Muiskraal. The intensity of sam-
pling in this study has, however, been too limited to cover
the area adequately. It is proposed therefore that the areas
on the north slopes of the Langeberg west and east of
262
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
Garcia’s Pass require thorough botanical investigation. If
these areas have high numbers of endemic plant species
as is indicated by this survey, these north slopes of the
Langeberg deserve a higher conservation status than is
currently the case.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The hospitality of the Oosthuizen family of the Farm
Bergfontein is gratefully acknowledged. Mr C. Martens,
Forester at Grootvadersbosch, gave invaluable support; he
and Messrs C. Ruiters and J. Solomon, also of Groot-
vadersbosch, who assisted with strenuous fieldwork, are
thanked sincerely. The advice and encouragement of Prof.
R.M. Cowling and Dr C. Boucher at times when it was
most needed is much appreciated. My wife and family
and my colleagues at the Stellenbosch Herbarium, Na-
tional Botanical Institute, are thanked for their support
during this project. Two anonymous referees are also
thanked for their suggested improvements to the manu-
script.
REFERENCES
BOND. P. & GOLDBLATT. P. 1984. Plants of the Cape Flora: a descrip-
tive catalogue. Journal of South African Botany Supplementary
Vol. 13.
BOND. W.J. 1981. Vegetation gradients in southern Cape Mountains.
M.Sc. thesis. University of Cape Town.
BOND, W.J., VLOK. J. & VIVIERS, M. 1984. Variation in seedling
recruitment of Cape Proteaceae after fire. Journal of Ecology 72:
209-221.
BOUCHER, C. 1978. Cape Hanaklip area. II. The vegetation. Bothalia
12: 455^197.
BOUCHER, C. 1987. A phytosociological study of transects through the
western Cape coastal foreland. Ph.D. thesis, University of
Stellenbosch.
CAMPBELL. B.M. 1985. A classification of the mountain vegetation of
the Fynbos Biome. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South
Africa No. 50.
CAM 'TELL, B.M.. COWLING. R.M., BOND, W„ KRUGER, F.J. &
' JLLABORATORS 1981. Structural characterization of vege-
:rn in the Fynbos Biome. South African National Scientific
rammes Report No. 52. CSfR, Pretoria.
COW! R.M. & GXABA. T. 1990. Effects of a fynbos overstorey
,b on understorey community structure: implications for the
' intenance of community-wide species richness. South African
Journal of Ecology 1: 1-7.
COWLING. R.M. ci HOLMES. P.M. 1992. Flora and vegetation. In R.M.
Cowling, The ecology of fynbos: nutrients, fire and diversity.
Oxford University Press, Cape Town.
COWLING. R.M. 1983a. The occurrence of C3 and C4 grasses in fynbos
and allied shrublands in the southeastern Cape, South Africa.
Oecologia 58: 121-127.
COWLING. R.M. 1983b. Phytochorology and vegetation history in the
southeastern Cape, South Africa. Journal of Biogeography 10:
393^419.
COWLING. R.M. 1984. A syntaxonomic and synecological study in the
Humansdorp region of the Fynbos Biome. Bothalia 14: 283-298.
DENT. M.C., LYNCH. S.D. & SCHULZE, R.E. 1987. Mapping mean
annual and other rainfall statistics over southern Africa. Water
Research Commission Report No. 27.
ESLER, K..I. & COWLING, R.M. 1990. Effects of density on the repro-
ductive output of Protect lepidocarpodendron. South African
Journal of Botany 55: 29-33.
FUGGLE, R.F. 1981. Macro-climatic patterns within the Fynbos Biome.
National Programme for Environmental Sciences, Final Report.
December 1981.
FUGGLE. R.F. & ASHTON, E.R. 1979. Climate. In J. Day, W.R. Sieg-
fried, G.N. Louw & M.L. Jarman, Fynbos ecology: a preliminary
synthesis. South African National Scientific Report No. 40.
GLYPHIS, J., MOLL. E.J. & CAMPBELL, B.M. 1978. Phytosociologi-
cal studies on Table Mountain, South Africa: 1. The Back Table.
Journal of South African Botany 44: 281-289.
GRANBY, R. 1980. Revision of the genus Coelidium (Liparieae-
Fabaceae). Opera Botanica 54: 1-47.
HILL, M.O. 1979a. TWINSPAN — a FORTRAN program for arranging
multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of
the individuals and attributes. Section of Ecology and Systemat-
ics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
HILL. M.O. 1979b. DECORANA — a FORTRAN program for detrended
correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. Section of
Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
KRUGER, F.J. 1979. South African heathlands. In R.L. Specht,
Heathlands and related shrublands. Ecosystems of the World, Vol.
9A. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
LAIDLER. D„ MOLL, E.J., CAMPBELL, B.M. & GLYPHIS, J. 1978.
Phytosociological studies on Table Mountain, South Africa: 2.
The Front Table. Journal of South African Botany 44: 291-295.
LINDER, H.P. 1985. Conspectus of the African species of Restionaceae.
Bothalia 15: 387-503.
LINDER, H.P. 1989. Grasses in the Cape Floristic Region: phytogeo-
graphical implications. South African Journal of Science 85: 502-
505.
MCDONALD, D.J. 1983. The vegetation of Swartboschkloof Jonkers-
hoek, Cape Province, South Africa. M.Sc. thesis. University of
Cape Town.
MCDONALD, D.J. 1988. A synopsis of the plant communities of
Swartboschkloof, Jonkershoek, Cape Province. Bothalia 18: 233-
260.
MCDONALD. D.J. 1993a. The vegetation of the southern Langeberg,
Cape Province. 1. The plant communities of the Boosmansbos
Wilderness Area. Bothalia 23: 129-151.
MCDONALD. D.J. 1993b. The vegetation of the southern Langeberg,
Cape Province. 2. The plant communities of the Marloth Nature
Reserve. Bothalia 23: 153-174.
MCKENZIE, B. 1978. A quantitative and qualitative study of the indige-
nous forests of the southwestern Cape. M.Sc. thesis, University of
Cape Town.
MCKENZIE. B„ MOLL. E.J. & CAMPBELL, B.M. 1977. A phytosocio-
logical study of Orange Kloof, Table Mountain, South Africa.
Vegetatio 34: 41-53.
MORRIS, M.I. 1981. The variation of components in the radiation bal-
ance over different fynbos vegetation types. M.A. thesis. Univer-
sity of Cape Town.
MUELLER-DOMBOIS, D. & ELLENBERG, H. 1974. Aims and me-
thods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, New York.
MUIR. J. 1929. The vegetation of the Riversdale Area, Cape Province.
Botanical Survey of South Africa, Memoir No. 13.
PRESTON-WHYTE, R.A. & TYSON, P.D. 1988. The atmosphere and
weather of southern Africa. Oxford LIniversity Press, Cape Town.
REBELO, A.G., COWLING. R.M., CAMPBELL, B.M. & MEADOWS,
M. 1991. Plant communities of the Riversdale Plain. South Afri-
can Journal of Botany 57: 10-28.
REYNOLDS, G.W. 1950. The aloes of South Africa. Trustees, The Aloes
of South Africa Book Fund, Johannesburg.
ROL1RKE, J.P. 1972. Taxonomic studies on Leucospermum R.Br. Journal
of South African Botany, Supplementary Vol. 8.
ROURKE, J.P. 1980. The proteas of southern Africa. Purnell, Cape Town.
SCHLILZE, B.R. 1965. Climate of South Africa, Part 8: general survey.
S.A. Weather Bureau 28. Government Printer, Pretoria.
SOIL CLASSIFICATION WORKING GROUP (SCWG) 1991. Soil
classification: a taxonomic system for South Africa. Memoirs on
the Agricultural Natural Resources of South Africa No. 15.
SWIFT. L.W. 1976. Algorithm for solar radiation on mountain slopes.
Water Resources Research 12: 108-112.
TAYLOR, H.C. & VAN DER MELILEN, F. 1981. Structural and floristic
classification of Cape mountain fynbos on Rooiberg, Southern
Cape. Bothalia 13: 557-567.
TAYLOR. H.C. 1963. A bird’s-eye view of the Cape mountain vegetation.
Journal of the Botanical Society of South Africa 49: 17-19.
TAYLOR, H.C. 1969. A vegetation survey of the Cape of Good Hope
Nature Reserve. M.Sc. thesis, University of Cape Town.
TAYLOR, H.C. 1978. Capensis. In M.J.A. Werger, Biogeography and
ecology of southern Africa. Junk, The Hague.
TAYLOR, H.C. 1984. A vegetation survey of the Cape of Good Hope
Nature Reserve. II. Descriptive account. Bothalia 15: 259-291.
VAN HEERDEN, J. & HURRY, L. 1987. Southern Africa’s weather
patterns : an introductory guide. Acacia Books. Pretoria.
VAN W1LGEN, B.W. 1984. Fire climates in the southern and western
Cape Province and their potential use in fire control and manage-
ment. South African Journal of Science 80: 358-362.
WERGER, M.J.A. 1974. On concepts and techniques applied in the
Ziirich-Montpellier method of vegetation survey. Bothalia II:
309-323.
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
263
WERGER, M.J.A, KRUGER, F.J. & TAYLOR, H.C. 1972. Aphytosocio-
logical study of the Cape fynbos and other vegetation at
Jonkershoek, Stellenbosch. Bothalia 10: 599-614.
WESTHOFF, V. & VAN DER MAAREL, E. 1973. The Braun-Blanquet
approach. In R.H. Whittaker, Ordination and classification of
communities. Junk, The Hague.
WILLIAMS, I. 1982. Studies in the genera of the Diosmeae (Rutaceae)
14: a review of the genus Diosma L. Journal of South African
Botany 48: 329^407.
WILLIAMS, I. 1984. Studies in the genera of the Diosmeae (Rutaceae)
15: a review of the genus Empleurum Aiton. Journal of South
African Botany 50: 425^434.
Errata in Bothalia 23,1: 157
The vegetation of the southern Langeberg, Cape Province. 2. The plant communities of the
Marloth Nature Reserve, by D.J. McDonald.
Replace 3rd paragraph, left column with:
The climate of the MNR is typical of the southern
Langeberg since it falls within the transition zone be-
tween winter and year-round rainfall areas. The mean
annual rainfall for the peaks is estimated to be >1 400
mm (Dent et al. 1987). However, the climate on the
south side of the range is distinctly different from that
on the north side. The south slopes of the southern
Langeberg experience the highest rainfall in late sum-
mer to autumn (March & April) and late winter to
spring (August, October & November). The driest pe-
riods are early summer (December) and early winter
(June), Figure 5A. A more marked bimodality is evi-
dent in the rainfall pattern on the north slopes which
are in a summer rainshadow. Here peaks in rainfall
occur in autumn (April & May) and late winter (Au-
gust). The driest period extends from spring to late
summer (October-March), Figure 5B. The mean sum-
mer maximum and mean winter minimum temperatures
for Swellendam are 29.4°C (January) and 6.6°C (July)
respectively. On the opposite side of the mountain at
Weltevrede the equivalent temperatures are 30.0°C
(February) and 2.9°C (July).
.
Bothalia 23,2: 265-269 ( 1993)
The efficient use of small plots in a fynbos phytosociological study in the
northern Cederberg: a quick way to collect plant-environmental data
P.J. MUSTART*, E.J. MOLL* and H.C. TAYLOR**
Keywords: Cederberg, phytosociological survey, small plot sizes
ABSTRACT
A phytosociological survey of selected plant communities in the northern Cederberg was made using small (4-16 m2) plot
sizes. A satisfactory phytosociological table was obtained, and plant-environmental relationships were inferred from it. The use
of small plot sizes enabled ecological information about plant communities to be quickly, easily and efficiently obtained. This
method could be of considerable use for establishing and monitoring vegetation patterns.
UITTREKSEL
’n Fitososiologiese opname van geselekteerde plantgemeenskappe in die noordelike Cederberg is gemaak, en klein (4—16
nr) perseelgroottes is gebruik. 'n Bevredigende fitososiologiese tabel is verkry, en plant-omgewingsverhoudings is daaruit
afgelei. Die gebruik van klein perseelgroottes het daartoe gelei dat ekologiese inligting oor plantgemeenskappe vinnig, maklik
en doeltreffend verkry kon word. Hierdie metode sou heel nuttig vir die bepaling en monitering van plantegroeipatrone gebruik
kon word.
INTRODUCTION
The Zurich-Montpellier, or Braun-Blanquet. approach
has been widely used to survey and classify vegetation
(Werger 1974). The aim of such studies is to describe the
communities of the chosen area and to correlate them with
environmental factors. In South Africa these vegetation
studies have been carried out at scales ranging from re-
gional, comprising several thousands of hectares ( Boucher
1978; Cowling 1984; Taylor 1984), to smaller areas of a
few hundred hectares and less (Werger et al. 1972; Cowl-
ing et al. 1976; Campbell & Moll 1977; McKenzie et al.
1977; Glyphis et al. 1978; Laidler et al. 1978; Campbell
et al. 1980; Van Wilgen & Kruger 1985). In these studies
plot size has ranged from 4 to 200 m": choice of plot size
has largely depended on floristic richness and structure of
the communities sampled, and usually ignores the small-
scale pattern. Relatively small plots (e.g. 25 m~) have been
suggested as suitable for reflecting less habitat hetero-
geneity than larger plot sizes, in turn leading to the un-
masking of subtle variations within the observed com-
munities (Van Wilgen & Kruger 1985).
Large plots possibly covering heterogeneous habitats
and hence reflecting transitional communities, are time-
consuming for data collection. Small plots obviate both
these problems. The aim of this study was to perform a
phytosociological survey in the northern Cederberg using
plots of small size (4-16 m~) in order to see if a satisfac-
tory Braun-Blanquet table could be obtained, and if plant-
environmental patterns could be inferred.
♦Department of Botany, University of Cape Town, Private Bag,
Rondebosch 7700. Cape Town.
**9 Dorries Drive, Simonstown 7995.
MS. received: 1992-08-17.
STUDY AREA
The area surveyed was in the Pakhuis Pass area of the
northern Cederberg at altitudes ranging from 600 to 1 000
m. The communities sampled lay between 18° 59' E to
19° 04' E, and 32° 08' S to 32° 1 V S, covering an area
of approximately 300 hectares. The vegetation is described
as Mesic Mountain Lynbos (Moll et al. 1984). The geol-
ogy of the area is quartzitic sandstone of the Peninsula
Lormation of the Table Mountain Group. The area falls
within the 60% winter rainfall region. The annual rainfall
is 480 mm of which 72% falls between April and August
(winter). Mean monthly maximum temperatures range
from 20°C (winter) to 30°C (summer). Mean minimum
temperatures drop to 5°C in midwinter.
METHODS
The area was surveyed using aerial photographs in
order to broadly identify communities. Braun-Blanquet
techniques as described by Werger (1974) were used.
Since plant relationships with the environment, and with
other plants, will be related to both the scale of environ-
mental variation and to plant size, releve size was chosen
in relation to vegetation structure (height) as follows: 2 x
2 m (<1 m in height); 2 x 4 m (1-2 m in height); and 4
x 4 m (>2 m in height). The following data were collected
in January 1986: floristic lists and cover abundance for
each of five to six releves per community (22 plots in
total); species not in the releve, but occurring in the sur-
rounding area in a 1-2 m border round the plot recorded
as (+). Environmental data, as set out in Table 1, were
recorded for each releve. The computer program
TWINSPAN (two-way indicator species analysis, Hill
1979) was applied to the raw data, producing a tabular
matrix approximating Braun-Blanquet table work. The
matrix was further sorted by hand.
266
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
TABLE 1. — Phytosociological table of northern Cederberg communities
Subcommunity 2b
Cannomois parviflora
Anlhospermum aethiopicum
Telraria ustulata
Ficinia deusla
Metalasia densa
Cymbopogon marginatus
Chasmanlhe sp.
Telraria cuspidata
Cluna alaternoides
Elytropappus sp.
Hypodiscus neesii
Pentaschistis curvifolia
Strulhiola ciliata
Selago sp.
Campanulaceae
Subcommunity 2a
Ischyrolepis gaudichaudiana
Merxmuellera arundinacea
2
(+)
1
2
Community 2
Ischyrolepis sieberi
Sloebe plumosa
Ficinia nigrescens
Clifforlia ruscifolia 1 2
Lobostemon glaucophyllus
Subcommunity 3b
Indigofera frutescens
Pentaschistis sp.
Udbeckia quinqueloha
Rhus rimosa
+
+ 1
+
(+)
+ (+)
+ +
(+) (+)
(+) (+)
BB cover values: (+) = not in quadrat, but occurring in surrounding area in a I to 2 m border round plot; + = <1% of quadrat area; 1 = 1-5%;
2 = 5-25%; 3 = 25-50%; 4 = 50-75%; 5 = 75-100%.
Rock cover (superscripts are BB cover values): n = none; b = bedrock; III = rock size (ht), >0.5 m; II = 0.25-0.5 m; I = 0.05-0.25 m.
Soil depth: 0 = skeletal, <0.05 m; I = shallow, 0.05-0.15 m; 01 = mixed skeletal and shallow; 2 = medium, 0.15-1.00 m; 3 = deep, >1.0 m.
Soil moisture: d = dry, well drained; df = dry, flat, hard surface; dr = dry, well drained with runoff.
Slope: 0 = level, 0-3°; 1 = gentle, 4-8°; 2 = moderate, 9-16°; 3 = steep, 17-26°.
Bothalia 23,2 ( 1993)
267
TABLE 1.— Phytosociological table of northern Cederberg communities (continued)
Widespread species
Eriocephalus africanus (+) 2 (+)
Ehrhana ramosa + 2 + ++ I121++ + +
BB cover values: (+) = not in quadrat, but occurring in surrounding area in a 1 to 2 m border round plot; + = <1% of quadrat area; 1 = 1—5%;
2 = 5-25%; 3 = 25-50%; 4 = 50-75%; 5 = 75-100%.
Rock cover (superscripts are BB cover values): n = none; b = bedrock; III = rock size (ht), >0.5 m; II = 0.25-0.5 m; I = 0.05-0.25 m.
Soil depth: 0 = skeletal, <0.05 m; 1 = shallow, 0.05-0.15 m; 01 = mixed skeletal and shallow; 2 = medium, 0.15-1.00 m; 3 = deep, >1.0 m.
Soil moisture: d = dry, well drained; df = dry, flat, hard surface; dr = dry, well drained with runoff.
Slope: 0 = level, 0-3°; 1 = gentle, 4-8°; 2 = moderate, 9-16°; 3 = steep, 17-26°.
Species not included in the above and found in one releve only (species name is followed by releve number, cover abundance value): Agathosma sp. 13, +;
A. puhigera/esterhuyseniae 6, 1; Arctotis laeris 1, (+); A. sp. 2, 2; Aspalathus spinosissima 8, 1; A. tridentata/quinquefolia 2, (+); Arislea singularis 20, +;
Babiana sp. 8, 1; Cassine peragua 19, (+); Chrysocoma tenuifolia 22, (+); Crassula atropurpurea 9, +; Cullumia bisulca 8, 2; Dilairis ixioides 17, (+); Diosma
acmaeophylla 9, (+); Diospyros austro-africana 19, 1; Dodonaea viscosa 22, +; Erica cf. articularis 7, +; Eriocephalus sp. 5, 1; Euclea linearis 22, 1; E.
undulata 22, +; Ficinia cedarbergensis 15, (+); F. compar 5, 1; Gnidia sp. 3, I; Helichrysum rutilans 3, +; Hypodiscus argenteus lb, 1; Kiggelaria africana
19, (+); Knowhonia capensis 22, +; Leucadendron concavum 1, +; Lobelia sp. 14, +; Macrosrylis squarrosa 7, 2; Manulea sp. 3, (+); Maytenus helerophylla
22, 1; Murallia sp. 16, +; Olhonna amplexifolia 22, (+); Passerina glomeraia 8, 1; Pelargonium cf. crithmoides 8, +; P. scabrum 12, I; Pharnaceum sp. 2,
+ ; Podocarpus elongatus 19, 2; Prismatocarpus sp. 1, +; Proiasparagus sp. 18, +; Protea acaulos 2, (+); Restio sp. (H.T. 00714) 6, 3; Rhus dissecta 22, (+);
R. scylophylla 19, +; R. tomentosa 18, 1; Scabiosa sp. 3, 1; Secamone alpinii 18, (+); Selago sp. 13, +; Serruria aitonii 2, (+); Stoebe sp. 4, +.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
There are three major floristic communities (Table 1).
1. Thamnochortus plcitypteris-Willdenowia arescens
Community
This community is an open herbland occurring in
releves 1 to 6, and differential species are Thamnochortus
plcitypteris and Willdenowia arescens. This graminoid
guild is further represented by high cover of Ischyrolepis
monanthos in all releves except number 6 (which in gene-
ral has few species); as well as Ficinia dunensis in three
releves; and Ischyrolepis cf. curviramis, Pentaschistis
viscidula , Tetraria nigrovaginata and Ficinia bidbosa in
two releves each. Macrostylis decipiens and Rafnia diffusa
are low sprawling bushes (± 300 mm high), together form-
ing an understorey to the restioid stratum in three releves.
Metalasia agathosmoides occurs in four releves, and there
is an occasional low presence of further asteraceous spe-
cies, Phaenocoma sp., Helichrysum sp„ Elytropappus sp.
and Ursinia sp., in some of the releves.
This community occurs on flat, sandy plains that are
fully exposed to sun and wind. The soil is well drained
268
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
and deep (>1 m in four releves, and 0.15-1.00 m in two
releves), and consists of a coarse-textured pale grey sand.
There is no rock cover. These factors, together with the
hot, dry summers and low annual rainfall create generally
very dry conditions.
The widespread and generally high cover of Res-
tionaceae species substantiates the hypothesis that these
shallow-rooted species are suited to survive in areas ex-
posed to severe summer drought due to their ability to
respond to summer moisture flushes with very rapid pho-
tosynthesis (Van der Heyden & Lewis 1989). The pres-
ence of both graminoids and Asteraceae concurs with
Campbell's (1986) finding that these taxa predominate at
the dry end of fynbos gradients. The occasional presence
of deeper-rooted proteoids ( Leucadendron concavum, Pro-
tect acaulos and Semina aitonii), each occurring in only
one releve, indicates the infrequent availability of suffi-
cient water at deeper levels.
2. Ischyrolepis sieberi-Ficinia nigrescens Community
This mid-dense graminoid shrubland has Ischyrolepis
sieberi and Ficinia nigrescens as differential species.
There is also a high cover of the shrubs Stoebe plumosa
and Cliffortia ruscifolia, in many of the releves. This com-
munity is spread over two different landscape forms:
releves 7 to 1 1 occur on level areas with much exposed
bedrock, and releves 12 to 17 occur on well-drained rocky
slopes (gentle to steep). Both environments have soils
varying in depth from skeletal to shallow, and consisting
of dark brown, mixed fine and coarse sand particles. Soil
of the bedrock environment type was dry and well drained
when examined in mid-summer, but during winter rains
the underlying bedrock could cause water accumulation.
Soils on the rocky slopes would be well drained during
the rainy season.
Subcommunity 2a
This subcommunity of five releves (7-11) on level bed-
rock has Ischyrolepis gaudichaudiana as sole differential
species. Merxmuellera arundinacea occurs in two releves.
Subcommunity 2b
This subcommunity occurs in the six releves (12-17)
of the rocky slopes environment, and has Cannomois
parviflora and Anthospermum aethiopicum as differential
species. Other graminoid species such as Tetraria ustulata,
T. cuspidata and Ficinia deusta commonly occur as do
the shrubby components Metalasia muricata and Stru-
thiola ciliata. Within sight of each releve was a mature
Protea nitida and/or P. laurifolia forming a sparse wood-
land overstorey. The aspect of these slopes is mostly east
with the one northwest-facing releve (No. 14) being near
to a seepage area. This, together with the high rock cover,
would make it a less dry and less wind-exposed environ-
ment than the bedrock one, and could account for the
absence of most of this subcommunity’s species in the
level bedrock environment (releves 7-11). Furthermore,
the rockiness in combination with slope-related drainage
patterns would result in a variety of moisture-related
microhabitats. This could also be the cause of the greater
numbers of species found on the rocky slopes than on the
level bedrock. Greater species richness on rocky slopes
than on level areas in arid areas has been attributed to
these factors (Barbour & Diaz 1973; Olsvig-Whittaker et
al. 1983).
3. Olea europaea subsp. africana-Maytenus oleoides
Community
The differential species of this closed woodland are
Olea europaea subsp. africana and Maytenus oleoides.
These, as well as Heeria argentea and Euclea natalensis,
are common to most of the releves of subcommunities 3a
and 3b. This community occurs adjacent to large boulders
(4 m and higher) which provide shelter from wind, sun
and fire, as well as extra moisture due to shade and water
runoff. Soils are of medium depth and the slope level to
gentle. This has allowed the development of a closed
woodland of trees and shrubs. Cassine peragua , a forest
tree (in one releve. No. 19), and Protasparagus scandens,
common in forest undergrowth, indicate the tendency of
succession to low forest. Substantial forest development
in this community is undoubtedly limited by the low rain-
fall of the area, and the fact that the prevalence of fire on
the adjacent plains severely limits the forest area.
Subcommunity 3a
The differential species are Myrsine africana and
Chironia baccifera in this subcommunity which occurs in
three releves. These, together with Diospyros glabra and
Euclea acutifolia form an understorey to the closed wood-
land canopy. The ground layer is poorly developed and
consists of sparsely occurring Chironia baccifera. These
species are mostly excluded from the drier subcommunity
3b.
Subcommunity 3b
Indigofera frutescens and Pentaschistis sp. are differ-
ential species. This subcommunity represents a drier gra-
dient of Community 3 since the releves in which it occurs
(20 and 21) have more sunny aspects (SW and NW) than
the other releves which face S or SE. This could account
for the absence of most of these species in the former
subcommunity, and vice versa. These two subcommuni-
ties appear to reflect moisture-related microhabitat differ-
ences within the woodland community.
CONCLUSIONS
A satisfactory phytosociological table was produced
using small plot sizes. We obtained a neat phytosociolog-
ical table, with well-defined communities. This in itself
indicates the existence of small-scale pattern in fynbos.
The survey was quickly (five days field work) and easily
achieved. The efficiency of this method would allow com-
paratively easy monitoring and quick establishment of
plant-environmental relationships.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank R Masson for assistance in using computer
programs, and Prof. R.M. Cowling for commenting on
the manuscript.
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
269
REFERENCES
BARBOUR, M.G. & DIAZ, D.V. 1973. Larrea plant communities on
bajada and moisture gradients in the United States and Argentina.
Vegetatio 28: 335-352.
BOUCHER, C. 1978. Cape Hangklip area II. The vegetation. Bothalia 12:
455^497.
CAMPBELL, B.M. 1986. Montane plant communities of the Fynbos
Biome. Vegetatio 66: 3-16.
CAMPBELL, B„ GUBB, A. & MOLL, E. 1980. The vegetation of the
Edith Stephens Cape Flats Flora Reserve. Journal of South Afri-
can Botany 46: 435^144.
CAMPBELL, B.M. & MOLL, E.J. 1977. The forest communities of
Table Mountain. South Africa. Vegetatio 34: 105-1 15.
COWLING, R.M. 1984. A syntaxonomic and synecological study in the
Humansdorp region of the Fynbos Biome. Bothalia 15: 175-227.
COWLING, R.M., MOLL, E.J. & CAMPBELL, B.M. 1976. The ecolog-
ical status of the understorey communities of pine forests on Table
Mountain. South African Forestry Journal 99: 13-24.
GLYPHIS, J., MOLL, E. & CAMPBELL. B. 1978. Phytosociological
studies on Table Mountain, South Africa. 1. The Back Table.
Journal of South African Botany 44: 281-289.
HILL, M.O. 1979. TWINSPAN — a FORTRAN programme for arranging
multivariate data in ordered two-way tables by classification of
individuals and attributes. Section of Ecology and Systematics,
Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
LAIDLER, D„ MOLL, E.J., CAMPBELL, B.M. & GLYPHIS, J. 1978.
Phytosociological studies on Table Mountain, South Africa. 2.
The Front Table. Journal of South African Botany 44: 291—
295.
MCKENZIE, B„ MOLL, E.J. & CAMPBELL, B.M. 1977. A phytosocio-
logical study of Orange Kloof, Table Mountain, South Africa.
Vegetatio 34: 41-53.
MOLL, E.J., CAMPBELL, B.M., COWLING, R.M., BOSSL L„ JAR-
MAN, M.L. & BOUCHER, C. 1984. A description of major
vegetation categories in and adjacent to the Fynbos Biome. South
African National Scientific Programmes Report No. 83.
OLSVIG-WHITTAKER, L„ SHACKAK, M. & YAIR. A. 1983. Vegeta-
tion patterns related to environmental factors in a Negev Desert
watershed. Vegetatio 54: 133-145.
TAYLOR, H.C. 1984a. A vegetation survey of the Cape of Good Hope
Nature Reserve. 1. The use of Association Analysis and Braun-
Blanquet methods. Bothalia 15: 245-258.
TAYLOR, H.C. 1984b. A vegetation survey of the Cape of Good Hope
Nature Reserve. 2. Descriptive account. Bothalia 15: 259-
291.
VAN DER HEYDEN, F. & LEWIS, O.A.M. 1989. Seasonal variation in
photosynthetic capacity with respect to plant water status of five
species of the mediterranean climate region of South Africa. South
African Journal of Botany 55: 509-515.
VAN WILGEN, B.W. & KRUGER, F.J. 1985. The physiography and
vegetation communities of the Zachariashoek catchments; south-
western Cape Province. South African Journal of Botany 51:
379-399.
WERGER, M. 1974. On concepts and techniques applied in the Ziirich-
Montpellier method of vegetation survey. Bothalia 1 1: 309-323.
WERGER, M.J.A., KRUGER, F.J. & TAYLOR, H.C. 1972. A phytoso-
ciological study of the Cape Fynbos and other vegetation at
Jonkershoek, Stellenbosch. Bothalia 10: 599-614.
,
-
.
.
'
Bothalia 23,2:271-326(1993)
The vegetation ecology of municipal Durban, Natal. Floristic classification
D.C. ROBERTS*
Keywords: floristic classification, municipal Durban, phytosociology. PHYTOTAB, urban open space
ABSTRACT
The vegetation of municipal Durban is classified according to the Braun-Blanquet method, using the PHYTOTAB program
package. Five major vegetation types with 18 communities are described, as are the major environmental factors influencing
vegetation composition and structure.
UITTREKSEL
Die plantegroei van Durban se munisipale gebied is volgens die Braun-Blanquet-metode met behulp van die PHYTOTAB-
programpakket geklassifiseer. Vyf hoof plantegroeitipes met 1 8 gemeenskappe word beskryf, asook die bepalende om-
gewingsfaktore wat plantegroeisamestelling en -struktuur be'i'nvloed.
CONTENTS
Introduction 271
Study area 271
Methods 273
Results 274
Description of the plant communities 274
Mangrove Forest 274
Community 1 : Avicennia marina-Bruguiera gym-
norrhiza Mangrove Short Forest 274
Coastal Forest Complex 276
Community 2: Transitional Eugenia capensis-
May terms procumbens High Closed Shrubland 276
Community 3: Mimusops caffra-Allophylus nata-
lensis Low/Short Thicket 278
Community 4: Manilkara discolor-Tricalysia lan-
ceolata Short Thicket 280
Community 5: Protorhus longifolia (sapling)-FVy-
chotria capensis Short Thicket 282
Valley Bushveld Complex 283
Community 6: Rhus pentheri-Cussonia spicata
Low Thicket 283
Community 7: Dovyalis rhamnoides-Hippobro-
mus pauciflorus Low Thicket 285
Shrubland Complex 286
Community 8: Transitional 286
Community 9: Acacia gerrardii-Rhus chirinden-
sis Tall Closed Shrubland//Low/Short Thicket
Mosaic 287
Community 10: Transitional 289
Grassland Complex 291
Community 1 1 : Bothriochloa insculpta-Hypar-
rhenia hirta Short Closed Grassland 291
Community 12: Phragmites australis-Cyperus im-
mensus Short Closed Grassland//Tall/High
Closed Shrubland//Tall Closed Reedbed Mosaic 292
Community 13: Senecio madagascariensis-Pani-
cum maximum Tall Closed Shrubland//Short
Closed Grassland Mosaic 293
* Department of Geographical and Environmental Sciences, University of
Natal, King George Vth Ave, Durban 4001.
MS. received: 1992-04-03.
Community 14: Phyllanthus burchellii-Digitaria
eriantha Short Closed Grassland//Tall
Sparse/Closed Shrubland Mosaic 295
Community 15: Sutera kraussianci-Aristida junci-
fonnis Low/Short Closed Grassland 298
Community 16: Hypoxis gerrardii-Alloteropsis
semialata Low Closed Grassland 299
Community 17: Helichrysum aureum-Themeda
triandra Short Closed Grassland 300
Community 18: Diantluis zeyheri-Eragrostis
curvula Short/Low Closed Grassland 302
Discussion and conclusions 303
Acknowledgements 304
References 304
Appendix 304
INTRODUCTION
In order to facilitate ecologically effective open space
planning and management within municipal Durban, a
comprehensive survey of all the remaining vegetated areas
within the city was undertaken. This excluded landscaped
or formally managed areas (e.g. parks, gardens and agri-
cultural lands). The study included classification of the
vegetation in terms of both floristics and structure, as well
as correlation of the vegetation classification with a range
of environmental parameters. This latter facilitated a more
accurate interpretation of the current ecological status and
conservation value of the City’s urban open space re-
sources.
STUDY AREA
The study area incorporates two local authority areas:
namely municipal Durban and Yellowwood Park. Al-
though Yellowwood Park is administered by an indepen-
dent health committee, it is completely encircled by
municipal Durban, and is included within the boundaries
of the study area to ensure physical continuity (Figure 1).
At the commencement of the study in 1983, municipal
Durban and Yellowwood Park together covered an area
of approximately 300.13 km“ (P. Johnson pers. comm.);
8.5 km" of which was covered by open water in Durban
272
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
FIGURE 1 . — Location of the study
area.
Harbour. In 1985/1986, the Durban municipal boundaries
were altered as a result of extensions made in the Isipingo
and Phoenix areas. Because of the difficulty of altering
the boundaries of the study area midway through the re-
search, and the fact that these changes would not signif-
icantly affect or compromise the outcome of the study,
the original municipal boundaries were retained.
Accordingly, the Umlaas River marks the southern
limit of the study area as far as the Umlaas canal, from
whence the boundary follows the route of the previously
uncanalised river to the coast at Isipingo. To the west and
north the study area is flanked by the districts of Klaarwa-
ter, Pinetown, Shallcross, Umhlatuzana, Queensburgh,
Westville, Chesterville, Clermont, KwaDabeka, Kwa-
Mashu, Duffs Road, Inanda, Mount Edgecombe, Glen
Anil and Umhlanga. This area is bounded by latitudes 29°
40' 20" and 29° 55' 55" south, longitude 30° 50' 03" east
and the Indian Ocean (Figure 1).
Low rolling hills characterise most of the study area,
with the terrain varying in altitude from sea level along
the eastern boundary to over 350 m above sea level in
Chatsworth, a distance of approximately 15 km. A major
topographic feature of the area is the steep-sided sand
ridge known as the Bluff Ridge. This ridge stands over
80 m (maximum height 108 m) in altitude and diverges
from the normal line of the coast at an angle of about 14
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
273
degrees (Preston- Whyte 1980). Inland and parallel to the
Bluff Ridge is a second, smaller ridge with a maximum
height of 91 m above sea level, which is often regarded
as part of the Bluff Ridge (Preston-Whyte 1980; King
1982). For the purposes of this study this ridge was re-
garded as a distinct land form and referred to as the Went-
worth Ridge (Alexander 1987). Both the Bluff and the
Wentworth Ridge trend in a southwest to northeast direc-
tion.
West of the Bluff and Wentworth Ridges, a third ridge,
known as the Berea Ridge, parallels the coast and rises
to about 130 m (maximum height 151m above sea level)
in altitude. Natal Bay, about which the city of Durban has
grown, lies between these two sets of ridges and is en-
closed by a curved spit which extends from the Umgeni
River estuary to the Point, and never exceeds 6 m in al-
titude (King & Maud 1964). The floor of the corridor
between the ridges is flat and low-lying and consists
largely of alluvial deposits from rivers draining into the
bay. These rivers have entrenched deep, youthful valleys
through the Berea Ridge but the coast of the Bluff Ridge
is unbroken in the bay area (Preston-Whyte 1980).
West of the Berea Ridge, away from the foreshore and
central city area, the terrain rises rapidly and becomes
progressively more rugged towards the interior (King &
Maud 1964). Here a low-lying hill and valley region
slopes up to interfluvial crests separated by the entrenched
east-west valleys (Preston-Whyte 1980) of the Umlaas,
Umhlatuzana, Umbilo and Umgeni Rivers. The valley
sides of these major rivers are steep, and where they cross
Natal Group Sandstone, gorges have been formed. These
large rivers have greatly influenced the topography of the
study area (Cawood 1980).
The geological units found within the study area are
considerably diverse and are discussed in detail by King
& Maud (1964). Archaean granite-gneiss underlies the
whole of the study area and is unconformably overlain
by: the arenaceous Natal Group Sandstones; the glacial
Dwyka Series and the argillaceous and arenaceous
Pietermaritzburg Shale and Vryheid Formations, both of
the Karoo sequence. There are several minor intrusions
(dykes and sills) of Karoo Dolerite scattered throughout
these formations. All other geological formations within
the Durban area have accumulated during the Quaternary
Era. These are: the Bluff Sandstones: the Berea Red Sand
and boulderbed; and sundry unconsolidated sand, grit and
clay associated with the harbour and city area; with alluvia
along the major river courses (King & Maud 1964).
The range of soils found in the Durban area is linked
not only to the nature of the parent geological material
from which they are derived, but also to the topography
of the land. The soils represented include: Arcadia
Rydalvale, Cartref Cartref, Dundee Dundee. Femwood
Fernwood, Glenrosa Williamson, Hutton Clansthal, Kat-
spruit Katspruit, Kroonstad Avoca. Kroonstad Mkambati.
Longlands Waldene, Milkwood Milkwood, Mispah
Mispah, Rensburg Phoenix, Shortlands Shortlands and
Swartland Swartland (Mac Vicar et al. 1977).
According to Acocks (1988) the study area contains
elements of both Coastal Forest and Thomveld (Veld Type
1) and Valley Bushveld (Veld Type 23), but both have
been badly disturbed by the process of urbanisation. The
climate in Durban is generally warm and humid with a
wet summer season, but with some form of precipitation
in all seasons (Cawood 1980). The main form of precip-
itation is rain, with an average of between 1 000 mm and
1 250 mm per annum (Preston-Whyte 1980). According
to Koppen’s classification (Schulze 1947), Durban falls
within the Cfwa unit. The mean annual temperature is
20.5°C with an annual range of 8.3°C (Preston-Whyte
1980).
METHODS
The Braun-Blanquet method of sampling and synthesis
followed in the study is described by Westhoff & Van der
Maarel ( 1973), Mueller-Dombois & Ellenberg ( 1974) and
Werger ( 1974).
The study area was stratified into physiognomic-phys-
iographic units using 1:1 750 aerial photography. Sam-
pling intensity was determined using the relationship
between mapping scale, vegetation structure and floristic
community described by Rutherford & Westfall (1986).
Sample sites were located by means of random co-ordi-
nates within each physiognomic-physiographic unit iden-
tified. A total of 345 sample sites, each of 1 1 3 m“ (as
determined by Rutherford & Westfall's (1986) proposed
relationship between mapping scale and smallest mappa-
ble unit area) were sited in homogeneous stands repre-
senting the different physiognomic-physiographic units.
At each sample site all plant species were listed to-
gether with their Domin-Krajina cover abundance values
and growth forms. The total canopy cover and height
range of each stratum of vegetation was also recorded for
the purpose of physiognomic-structural classification (Ed-
wards 1983). The environmental parameters recorded
were altitude, aspect, slope, geological formation and li-
thology, soil texture, soil depth, soil form and series, geo-
morphology and land use.
The vegetation was classified according to the Braun-
Blanquet method using the PHYTOTAB program package
(Westfall et al. 1982; Westfall & De Wet 1988). The main
environmental factors influencing the communities were
derived from gradients determined by an ordination of flo-
ristic data by detrended correspondence analysis (DCA)
(Hill & Gauch 1980) using the DECORANA program
(Hill 1979). Species diversity for each community was
expressed as a function of average species number per
releve/area of the releve. Furthermore, because of the sig-
nificant impact of alien invasive species on the plant
ecolgy of municipal Durban, figures for percentage occur-
rence and average cover of the two predominant species:
Chromolaena odorata * and Lantana camara* are record-
ed for all community types. (Note: * denotes alien spe-
cies).
Community structure is illustrated by means of layer
diagrams (Ito 1979) whereby vegetation height classes are
grouped into three strata, namely a herb/grass stratum (0-
0.5 m), a shrub stratum (0.5-5.0 m) and a tree stratum
(>5.0 m), and determining the highest mean percentage
cover in each stratum. The following symbols, determined
274
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
by the highest mean cover in a stratum, are used to classify
each layer diagram type.
Layer diagram type
L-type
rL-type
D-type
C-type
I-type
Cover of strata
herb>shrub>tree
herb<shrub<tree
herb<shrub>tree
herb>shrub<tree
herb=shrub=tree
RESULTS
DESCRIPTION OF THE PLANT COMMUNITIES
In the community descriptions woody and herbaceous
species are both listed in order of constancy followed by
mean percentage cover, with the respective values indi-
cated next to each species. The general species character-
istics of each community are omitted from the community
descriptions because they are directly apparent from the
Appendix (p. 304). Where species occurrences have spe-
cial significance, however, these are noted.
Classification of the vegetation, according to the
Braun-Blanquet method, revealed 18 plant communities
within five major vegetation types. Communities are
named according to the preliminary rules and recommen-
dations for a standardised South African syntaxonomic no-
menclature system proposed by the South African
Syntaxonomic Nomenclature Committee (Scheepers et al.
unpubl.). Each name comprises a diagnostic species fol-
lowed by a dominant species and a physiognomic struc-
tural term (Edwards 1983). Because of the highly
disturbed nature of most of the remnant plant communities
found within the Durban area, it is not possible to assign
a single physiognomic structural term to many of the
groupings described. A long history of disturbance, vary-
ing spatially, temporally and in intensity, has produced a
mosaic of structural types within each distinct floristic
grouping. In order to accommodate this variation and give
a truer representation of the nature of the plant commu-
nities involved, each community is described as a physi-
ognomic mosaic where appropriate. Edwards' (1983)
structural classification makes provision for this through
the use of / 'where straddling of height classes occurs’
and // ‘where mosaics of classes are found’.
The phytosociological classification of communities is
shown in the synoptic Appendix (p. 304). Diagnostic spe-
cies are listed in groups 1—15, and non-diagnostic and
infrequent species in groups 46-52**. The taxa on the left
of the matrix, are grouped into simplified lifeform classes
to facilitate 'veld condition’ assessment (Westfall et al.
1983); the life form classes are based on Dyer's (1976)
description of the genera of South African flowering
plants.
MANGROVE FOREST
Community 1: Avicennia marina-Bruguiera gymnor-
rhiza Mangrove Short Forest (Figure 3)
This short mangrove forest (Edwards 1983) is found
along the Natal coast in bays, lagoons and at river mouths
where suitable mudflats occur (0-5 m). It is represented
by releves 11, 13, 14, 201 and 202, with 2-5 species per
releve. This short forest community has a rL structure (Ito
1979; Figure 2A) with the greatest average cover of 5 1.6%
in the upper height class of higher than 5 m. The two
lower height strata are comprised almost exclusively of
the saplings and seedlings of the three dominant tree spe-
cies.
Habitat
The soils are of the Femwood Form, Femwood Series
and are derived from grey sands of the Berea System and
recent alluvial deposits. The terrain is generally flat with
a slight easterly (Beachwood Nature Reserve) or westerly
(Bayhead mangroves) aspect.
Floristics
The community is diagnosed by the Avicennia marina
species group (Appendix .1), and has no species in com-
mon with any other species group listed in the Appendix.
The character species for this group consist exclusively
of three halophytic mangrove tree species: Avicennia ma-
rina, Bruguiera gymnorrhiza and Rhizophora mucronata.
The species diversity per unit area for this community is
therefore low, with an average of 0.03 species per m",
and an average of three species per releve.
In cases where various life forms, such as trees and
shrubs have adopted a scandent growth form, these are
referred to as climbers. A distinction is also made within
species in terms of developmental stage; with seedlings,
saplings and fully grown forms of each species being
clearly differentiated from one another. In instances where
plants could not be identified beyond the generic level,
the epithet sp. is appended (e.g. Ipomoea sp.). It should
be noted that such a name may not necessarily refer to a
consistent species concept, but may include various spe-
cies within the genus. The structural classification of each
community together with appropriate layer diagram type
is shown in Figure 2.
** complete phytosociological tables for both the diagnostic species and
the non-diagnostic species are available from the author or Dr R.H.
Westfall, Agricultural Research Council, Roodeplaat Grassland Institute,
Private Bag X05, Lynn East 0039, Pretoria.
Trees and shrubs
% Mean
Occurrence cover
Chromolaena odorata* (shrub) 0.0% 0.0%
Lantana camara* (shrub) 0.0% 0.0%
Conspicuous woody species with more than 5% mean
cover and occurring in more than 20% of the releves rep-
resenting this community are:
Avicennia marina ( tree) 100.0% 45.8%
Bruguiera gymnorrhiza (tree) 100.0% 38.6%
Rhizophora mucronata (tree) 60.0% 20.4%
Herbs
The only herb species present in more than 20% of
the releves representing the community is:
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
275
Arthrocnemum perenne (undershrub) 20.0% 0.002%
(non-diagnostic)
The presence of this genus as the only representative
of the herb stratum (other than seedlings of the three dom-
inant tree species) indicates the saline, mesic conditions
experienced in this community.
Saplings and seedlings
Saplings and seedlings occurring in more than 20% of
the releves representing the community are:
General
Community 1 is floristically unrelated to any of the
other vegetation types identified within the study area, and
thus shares no common species groups with any of the
other communities. It is equivalent to Acocks’s (1988)
Mangrove Forest, Moll’s (1976) Mangrove Swamp and
allied communities and Ward’s (1980) Mature Mangrove
Communities.
Because of its floristic isolation, and the fact that this
community depends entirely on within-community dyna-
mics for long-term survival, the mangroves are considered
to have a high conservation status. This ranking is further
re-inforced by the restricted occurrence of this community
within the municipal Durban area. Only two sites remain:
the first and largest at Beachwood Nature Reserve, and
the second in a limited area on the mudflats of Durban
Bay to the west of Salisbury Island. A small, threatened
community occurs at the Isipingo Lagoon, just outside of
Durban. If these remaining sites are lost, there is little or
no potential for re-establishment of similar communities
elsewhere in the municipal area due to loss of suitable
habitat.
The ecological autonomy of this vegetation type may
be attributed to the specific habitat requirements of the
community (Hutchings & Saenger 1987). Mangroves
5m <
0,5 < 5m
Om < 0,5m
0 25 50 75 100
Community 5 type rL
I
5m <
0,5 < 5m
Om < 0,5m
0 25 50 75 100
Community 9 Type D
0 25 50 75 100
Community 14 Type D
5m <
0,5 < 5m
Om < 0,5m
0 25 50 75 100
Community 17 Type D
0 25 50 75 100
Community 3 Type D
0 25 50 75 100
Community 1 1 Type D
0 25 50 75 100
Community 18 Type D
0 25 50 75 100
Community 4 Type rL
0 25 50 75 100
Community 16 Type L
FIGURE 2. — Average community structure of the vegetation of muncipal Durban, showing height classes, strata, mean percentage cover and layer
diagram types (see Methods).
276
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
FIGURE 3. — Community 1: Avicen-
nia marina-Bruguiera gym-
norrhiza Mangrove Short For-
est. Note continuous canopy of
Avicennia marina and large
number of establishing Avi-
cennia marina propagules in
foreground. Location: Bay-
head Mangroves.
occur only on shores where the vigour of the surf is bro-
ken by sand bars or coral reefs or islands (White 1983).
This niche is effectively unavailable to plant species other
than die specifically adapted halophytes which occupy it.
As a result the mangrove community has the lowest spe-
cies diversity of all the communities described in this
study (Figure 4). The extreme environmental conditions
have also prevented invasion by Chromolaena odorata*
and Lantana camara* (Figures 5 & 6), the two most im-
portant invasive alien species in Natal (Macdonald & Jar-
man 1985).
Habitat
The soils are of the Femwood Form, Fernwood Series,
and Hutton Form, Clansthal Series. The latter occur in the
two atypical releves found within this community, 205
and 219, and should not be regarded as characteristic. The
terrain varies from flat to a slope of 26.6°. Aspect is also
variable, with all points of an eight-point rose equally rep-
resented except for north, northeast and southwest.
FI ori sties
The rL structure illustrated in the structure diagram
(Figure 2 A) is a product of these environmental restraints,
as the limit placed on the number of species capable of
surviving in these areas means that the community is
dominated exclusively by the three mangrove tree species,
Avicennia marina, Bruguiera gymnorrhiza, Rhizophora
mucronata. This produces a community structure cha-
racterised by a single layer of trees with little or no un-
derstorey. The cover within the 0.5-5.0 m category is
made up of saplings and young individuals of the three
tree species. Seedlings and/or saplings for all three domi-
nant tree species were recorded only within the releves
sampled at Bayhead in the harbour.
COASTAL FOREST COMPLEX
Community 2: Transitional Eugenia capensis-Maytenus
procumbens High Closed Shrubland (Figure 7)
This high closed shrubland//low thicket community
mosaic (Edwards 1983) is found between 5 and 75 m
above sea level. It is represented by seven releves (Ap-
pendix) with 4—10 species per releve. This community has
a D structure (Ito 1979; Figure 2B) with the greatest av-
erage cover of 75.3% in the 0.5-5.0 m height class.
This community is differentiated by the absence of
character species. The species diversity per unit area is
low and averages 0.06 species per nT for the community,
with an average of 6.6 species per releve.
Trees and shrubs
Percentage occurrence and average cover of Chromo-
laena odorata* and Lantana camara* are:
Average number of species per m2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Community number
FIGURE 4. — Species diversity for Communities 1-18.
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
277
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Community number
Percentage of releves
Community number
FIGURE 5. — Average percentage cover of Chromolaena odorata* and
Lantana camara* in Communities 1-18.
Chromolaena odorata* (shrub) 42.9% 23.9%
Lantana camara* (shrub) 28.6% 14.6%
Conspicuous woody species with more than 5% mean
cover and occurring in more than 20% of the releves rep-
resenting this community are:
Ficus burtt-davyi (shrub) 28.6% 23.9%
Rhus nebulosa (shrub) 28.6% 14.6%
Albizia adianthifolia (tree) 28.6% 8.1%
Herbs
There are no herb species occurring in more than 20%
of the releves representing the community.
Climbers
The only climber present in more than 20% of the
releves representing the community is:
Rhoicissus digitata ( shrub) 28.6% 28.6%
FIGURE 6. — Percentage of releves in Communities 1-18 in which
Chromolaena odorata* and Lantana camara* were recorded.
General
The majority of the releves constituting this community
occur in the frontal section of the secondary dunes (Tinley
1985) and are floristically equivalent to Tinley’s (1985)
Scrub-Thicket Community, Cawood's (1980) Dune Scrub
and Ward's (1980) Closed Dune Scrub. Acocks (1988)
does not recognise this as a separate community and de-
scribes this formation as part of the Dune Forest unit.
According to the classification presented in this study,
also included within this community are two releves (205
and 219) comprised predominantly of dense stands of the
two invasive species Chromolaena odorata * and Lantana
camara *, situated well inland of the secondary dune area.
Although these releves are floristically different from
those located within the dune area, they are similar in
terms of cover, structure, density and species richness. For
the purposes of community description, the frontal dune
scrub/thicket community (Moll 1976; Tinley 1985) repre-
FIGURE 7. — Community 2: Tran-
sitional Eugenia capensis -
Maytenus procumbens High
Closed Shrubland. Note wind-
clipped, compact, even canopy
of closed frontal dune commu-
nities (in the middle and back-
ground) containing Eugenia
capensis. Maytenus procum-
bens and Rhus nebulosa. Dune
pioneer Scaevola thunbergii
(of the Strand community) in
foreground. Location: Vir-
ginia Beach.
278
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
sented by Community 2 (excluding the atypical releves)
could be more accurately described as Eugenia capensis-
Maytenus procumbens High Closed Shrubland rather than
as a transitional group as indicated in the Appendix.
Community 2 is related to Community 3 through the
shared presence of the Eugenia capensis species group
(Appendix .3), and to Communities 3 and 5 through the
shared presence of the Ficus burtt-davyi species group
(Appendix .9), this indicates a common indigenous shrub
element throughout all three communities. Its association
with the other vegetation complexes is limited to gener-
alist species groups (both indigenous and alien) that are
ubiquitous throughout the study area, and is the result of
the presence of the two atypical releves already noted.
The strong floristic relationship between Communities 2,
3 & 5 is the first indication that the community spectrum
should be treated as the fundamental unit for conservation.
This implies that it is insufficient merely to preserve a
single area of each community type without preserving
ecological/physical continuity with viable examples of the
associated types.
As with the mangroves, the species diversity in the
frontal dune area is restricted by the severe environmental
conditions to which the community is exposed (Ward
1980). The diversity of the frontal dune communities is,
however, higher than in the mangroves (Figure 4). The
presence of Chromolaena odorata * and Lantana camara*
in this community (Figures 5 & 6) is due only to the
inclusion of the two atypical releves, although Cawood
(1980) and Ward (1980) both note that Lantana camara*
is an important invasive species in areas of disturbance
in the frontal dune community. In this connnunity a D
structure predominates (Figure 2B), and is the result of
the ‘salt-spray factor' which produces a clipped-hedge ap-
pearance (Ward 1980). The predominant structural stratum
in this community therefore falls within the 0.5-5.0 m
category. The existence of a cover value in the greater
than 5 m category, is the result of releves sampled further
inland, here ‘as the scrub-thicket matures it provides in-
creasing protection and humus, with patches of uneven
canopy in lee sites and hollows’ (Tinley 1985).
Community 3: Mimusops caffra-Allophylus natalensis
Low/Short Thicket (Figure 8)
This low/short thicket community (Edwards 1983) is
found between 5 and 142 m above sea level. It is repre-
sented by 23 releves (Appendix) with 7-26 species per
releve, and has a D structure (Ito 1979; Figure 2C) with
the greatest average cover of 68.9% in the 0.5-5 .0 m
height class.
Habitat
The soils are mainly of the Femwood Form, Femwood
Series (8 releves) and Hutton Form, Clansthal Series (13
releves). However, the two releves located within
Stainbank Nature Reserve have soils of the Cartref Fonn,
Cartref Series and Kroonstad Form, Mkambati Series. The
terrain varies from flat to a slope of 45°. The aspect of
the land in each of the releves is also variable, with all
points of an eight-point rose represented except northeast.
The southeasterly aspect is the most common, and found
in six out of the 23 releves.
Floristics
This community is differentiated by the Mimusops
caffra-Allophylus natalensis species group (Appendix .2).
The species diversity averages 0.15 species per rn with
an average of 14.1 species per releve. A notable feature
of this community is that 47.1% of the diagnostic species
for this community are either seedlings or saplings.
Trees and shrubs
Percentage occurrence and average cover of Chro-
molaena odorata* and Lantana camara* are:
FIGURE 8. — Community 3: Mimu-
sops caffra-Allophylus nata-
lensis Low/Short Thicket.
Note the lack of large trees or
forest patches. Predominant is
a thicket of Brachylaena dis-
color, Chrysanthemoides mo-
nilifera, and Strelitzia nicho-
lai , interspersed with repre-
sentatives of Allophylus na-
talensis and Mimusops caffra.
Chromolaena odorata* and
Lantana camara* in fore-
ground indicate previous dis-
turbance. Location: southeast-
ern Bluff slopes.
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
279
Saplings and seedlings
The only sapling occurring in more than 20% of the
releves representing the community is:
Deinbollia oblongifolia sapling (tree) 39.1% 0.04%
General
This community can be equated with Acocks’s ( 1988)
and Moll's (1976) Dune Forest, Tinley’s (1985)
Thicket/Forest Community and Ward's (1980) Mimusops
cajfra Woodland. Within the study area no significant
patches of forest remain due to previous logging of the
larger trees for building poles and fuel wood (Ward 1980;
Director Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department
1989). To a large extent the community is dominated by
heliophytic thicket elements such as Mimusops and
Brachylaena with a significant creeper component (Moll
1976; Tinley 1985). The dense tangle of creepers, climb-
ers, scandents and woody lianas which entwine the canopy
is one of the most striking features of this community.
These creepers are most abundant on the margins of
thicket/forest, in openings where the canopy is light and
especially in secondary habitats.
Moll (1976) (also Ward 1980) notes that ‘much of the
high density of these lianas can be attributed to recent
disturbance, particularly where Flagellaiia is present.' The
predominance of Brachylaena discolor over large areas of
this community can also be attributed to previous damage
and disturbance (Moll 1976). Based on his observations
at Isipingo during the period 1949-1960, Ward (1980)
concluded that Allophylus natalensis and Brachylaena dis-
color, both characteristic species in this community, are
not tolerant of deep shade, and unless there is disturbance,
do not occur in the Dune Forest proper. The fact that
47.1% of the diagnostic species for this community are
either seedlings or saplings indicates that regeneration is
a significant aspect of this community’s dynamics, and
could also be related to prior disturbance.
Communities 2 and 3 are clearly related through the
common presence of the Eugenia capensis species group
(Appendix .3) and the Ficus burtt-davyi species group
(Appendix .9). The latter also shows floristic associations
with Community 5. The association between Communities
2 & 3 indicated by the Eugenia capensis species group
(Appendix .3), is dependent on the fact that these two
groups form the dune component of the Coastal Forest
Complex. Together they represent a gradation from the
high closed shrubland of the foredunes through to the
low/short thicket of the backdunes.
The affinities of the Ficus burtt-davyi species group
(Appendix .9) indicate that the dune components of the
complex are not floristically isolated from the inland com-
ponents of the Coastal Forest Complex, represented here
by Community 5. This strong floristic association is con-
finned by the fact that releves in Seaton Park. Bunnan
Bush and Stainbank Nature Reserve, traditionally regarded
as areas of coastal forest as opposed to dune forest (Moll
1976; Cawood 1980) occur in Community 3; whereas of
the 18 releves located on the Bluff Ridge's seaward facing
slopes (typically regarded as dune forest), 12 are grouped
within the dune component (Community 3) and six within
the coastal component (Community 5). This confirms the
existence of a vegetation continuum in the Coastal Forest
Complex, as opposed to the existence of totally distinct
and separate community types, and has obvious impli-
cations for conservation planning. The coastal forest sam-
ples included within Community 3 form a distinct floristic
subgroup (Appendix) not dominated by Mimusops cajfra
and Allophylus natalensis which are regarded as indicator
species for Dune Forest (Acocks 1988); this subgroup
serves to indicate the unambiguous links between these
two groups and reinforces the need for a landscape ap-
proach to conservation (Forman & Godron 1986).
This floristic association between Communities 3 & 5
is the result of the distribution of differential species which
are widespread within the coastal areas of the urban land-
scape e.g. Deinbollia oblongifolia (Appendix .8) and Ficus
burtt-davyii (Appendix .9) and a variety of scandent forms
such as Rlioicissus rhomboidea (Appendix .8) and
Flagellaria guineensis (Appendix .8). This compares with
the diagnostic species which distinguish communities, and
have a more limited distribution e.g. Mimusops caffra
(Appendix .2) and Protorhus longifolia (Appendix .6).
Both diagnostic and differential species are critical to the
identity and continued viability of the communities and
must be catered for in conservation programs. This implies
the need for large core areas to protect localised diagnostic
species populations, with provision for continuity between
these cores to allow free dispersal of the differential spe-
cies groups which provide the broader-level ecological
continuity across the urban landscape. This is totally com-
patible with the recommendations of Reticular Biogeog-
raphy (Roberts 1990), used in the design of the municipal
Durban open space system.
280
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
In Community 3 there is a marked increase in species
diversity in comparison to Community 2. This is probably
due to the more favourable and sheltered environmental
conditions which prevail further inland (Figure 4). The
average cover and percentage occurrence of Lantana
camara* is greater than Chromolaena odorata *, although
compared to the levels of these two species in other
wooded communities, the absolute values are compara-
tively low (Figures 5 & 6). In this community too, the
effect of salt-spray also affects physiognomy. This accords
with the D structure evident for this community (Figure
2C) where there is a strong representation in the 0.5-5. 0
m layer, but a greater percentage cover in the >5 m cate-
gory than evident in Community 2.
Community 4: Manilkara discoIor-Tricalysia
lanceolata Short Thicket (Figure 9)
This short thicket community (Edwards 1983) is found
at altitudes between 70 and 133 m above sea level. It is
represented by releves 167, 297, 299 and 309 with 13-20
species per releve. This community has an rL structure
(Ito 1979; Figure 2D) with the greatest average cover of
71.0% in the upper height classes of greater than 5 meters.
Habitat
The soils are of the Cartref Form, Cartref Series (3 out
of 4 releves) and Kroonstad Form, Mkambati Series. The
terrain slopes from 1.4° to 39.8° in a generally easterly
direction (only one of the four releves has a westerly as-
pect).
FI ori sties
This community is differentiated by the Manilkara dis-
color species group (Appendix .4). The species diversity
per unit area averages 0.16 species per m“ for the com-
munity with an average of 18.3 species per releve.
Trees and shrubs
Percentage occurrence and average cover of Chro-
molaena odorata * and Lantana camara * are:
Lantana camara* (shrub) 50.0% 45.5%
Chromolaena odorata* (shrub) 0.0% 0.0%
Conspicuous woody species with more than 5% mean
cover and occurring in more than 20% of the releves rep-
resenting the community are:
(non-diagnostic)
Herbs
Herb species occurring in more than 20% of the releves
representing the community are:
Cyperus alhostriatus (sedge) 50.0% 0.3%
Panicum laticomum (grass) 25.0% 19.0%
Isoglossa woodii (forb/undershrub) 25.0% 12.8%
(non-diagnostic)
General
Within the complex of coastal forest communities,
Community 4 emerges as a distinct unit, which, because
of its specific floristic relationships and characteristics can
be separated from the community spectrum created by
Communities 2, 3 & 5. Community 4 is related to Com-
munity 3 through the common presence of the Tricalysia
lanceolata species group (Appendix .5), and to Commu-
nity 5 via the common presence of the Psychotria capen-
sis species group (Appendix .7), and to both 3 and 5
through the shared presence of the Rhoicissus rhomboidea
species group (Appendix .8). This latter group indicates
floristic similarity at the subcanopy level between these
three communities. The floristic relationships shared by
Communities 3 & 4 and by Community 4 & 5 suggest
the presence of a distinct dune and coastal element in
Community 4. The association with Community 5 is the
more significant of the two, and is reinforced by the fact
that the affiliation between Community 3 and 4 in the
Tricalysia lanceolata species group (Appendix .5) is a re-
sult of the floristic similarities shown between the sub-
group of coastal forest releves incorporated into
Community 3, and the releves constituting Community 4.
This pattern reveals strong, but selective, floristic as-
sociations between Community 4 and the remainder of
the communities constituting the Coastal Forest Complex.
It shares distinct floristic ties with both Communities 3 &
5, but shows no similar association with Community 2 as
indicated by its absence from the Ficus burtt-davyi species
group (Appendix .9). This is noticeably different from
Communities 3 & 5 which show clear floristic links with
Community 2, and indicates that the indigenous shrub
component shared by Communities 2, 3 & 5 is not present
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
281
FIGURE 9. — Community 4: Manil-
kara discolor-Tricalysia lan-
ceolatei Short Thicket. Canopy
composed of Albizia adian-
thifolia, Canthium inerme,
Combretum kraussii, Manil-
kara discolor, P rotorhus
longifolia and Strelitzia ni-
colai. Location: Silverglen
Nature Reserve.
in Community 4. The only association between Commu-
nity 2 & 4 occurs at the most generalised floristic level
through the Chaetacanthus burchellii species group (Ap-
pendix .45). This group contains only generalistic and op-
portunistic species, (both alien and indigenous) and even
here there would have been no association if it had not
been for the two anomalous releves included in Commu-
nity 2. Although these patterns could in part be an artifact
of undersampling (Community 4 is identified by only four
sample sites), the relationship between the dune and
coastal forest communities is certainly far more complex
and inter-related than previously documented (Moll 1976;
Cawood 1980; Ward 1980).
The close floristic associations between Communities
2, 3, 4 & 5 re-emphasise the need for any urban open
space system to conserve a landscape continuum rather
than single examples of each community type. This ap-
proach, however, is a complex one. Variations within the
continuum, such as that provided by Community 4, com-
plicate conservation planning because of the biased im-
portance of some floristic links, e.g. the coastal association
(Community 5) is more critical to Community 4 than the
dune communities (Communities 2 & 3). Yet because
dune species are essential to the continued identity and
viability of Community 5, ultimately it is not possible to
preserve Community 4 without preserving viable commu-
nities of Community 2, 3 & 5, even though the floristic
associations between Community 4 and Communities 2
& 3 are relatively limited.
Community 4 also shows specific floristic associations
outside of the Coastal Forest Complex with the Valley
Bushveld Complex through the Canthium inerme (sapling)
species group (Appendix .12). This is less exclusive than
the relationships with Communities 3 & 5. This associa-
tion reinforces the link between Communities 4 & 5, while
de-emphasising the dune connection even further, as Com-
munities 6 & 7 of the Valley Bushveld Complex have no
floristic links with Community 2. They are, however,
clearly floristically associated with Communities 3 & 5,
e.g. through the Calpumia aurea species group (Appendix
.16). The exact implications of these community relation-
ships are as yet unclear, but field observations of Com-
munity 4 indicate that the result is a mix of species typical
of coastal forest and valley bushveld, with the coastal for-
est element predominant.
This observation is supported by the fact that the areas
occupied by Community 4, i.e. Silverglen and Welbedacht,
have traditionally been regarded as a botanical transition
zone (Cawood 1980; Moll 1976). The existence of such
transition areas reinforces the need to ensure ecological
continuity between community complexes in order to en-
sure long-term viability. Any conservation system must
therefore make provision not only for the linking of com-
munity types, but also for the linking of community com-
plexes. in order to accommodate the natural complexity
of floristic associations.
There is only a slight increase in diversity between
Communities 3 and 4 (Figure 4). The average cover and
percentage occurrence of Lantana camara * is again
greater than Chromolaena odorata* (Figures 5 & 6). This
latter observation may, however, also be a result of the
fact that this community was undersampled, as may be
the fact that the average cover shown by Lantana camara *
is the highest percentage obtained for any community. The
presence of Lantana camara* does, however, indicate ex-
tensive disturbance as a factor in this community.
Other important features of this community are the
well-developed herb layer, a large sapling and seedling
component and the frequency of creepers and climbers.
Both the presence of saplings in significant numbers and
the proliferation of creepers and climbers such as
Dalbergia provide an indication of past disturbance in this
area and subsequent regeneration. In comparison to Com-
282
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
munity 3, the rL structure of this community (Figure 2D)
indicates that the highest cover values occur within the
>5 m category. Nevertheless, the cover values in the 0.5-
5.0 m class are significant and can be attributed to the
high sapling count and presence of Lantana camara*, and
previous removal of large trees.
Community 5: Protorhus longifolia (saplingJ-ZNyc/io-
tria capensis Short Thicket (Figure 10)
This short thicket community (Edwards 1983) is found
at altitudes of 5-124 m. It is represented by 29 releves
(Appendix) with 6-36 species per releve. This community
has an rL structure (Ito 1979; Figure 2E) with the greatest
average cover 75.9% in the >5 m height class.
Habitat
The majority of the soils underlying this community
are of the Hutton Form, Clansthal Series (21 releves). The
Cartref Form, Cartref Series occurs in two releves and
each of the following soil types are represented in a single
releve; Dundee Form, Dundee Series; Femwood Form,
Fernwood Series; Katspruit Form, Katspruit Series;
Longlands Form, Waldene Series; Mispah Form, Mispah
Series and Swartland Form, Swartland Series. The slope
of the terrain varies from flat to a 51.3° slope. Aspect is
variable and all eight points of an eight-point rose are
represented. West and north are the two most common
directions, occurring in 6 and 5 releves respectively.
Floristics
This community is distinguished by the Canthium ob-
ovatum (sapling) species group (Appendix .6). The species
diversity per unit area averages 0.16 species per m" for
the 29 releves with an average of 18.1 species per releve.
A significant feature of this community is that 68.4% of
the diagnostic species occur as seedlings or saplings.
Trees and shrubs
Percentage occurrence and average cover of Chro-
molaena odorata* and Lantana camara * are:
Saplings and seedlings
The only sapling occurring in more than 20% of the
releves representing the community is:
Deinbollia oblongifolia sapling (tree) 20.7% 0.6%
FIGURE 10. — Community 5: Proto-
rhus longifolia (sapling)-
Psychotria capensis Short
Thicket. Canopy composed of
Canthium obovatum, Chae-
tacme aristata, Protorhus
longifolia and St rye Imos
madagascariensis. Location:
Burman Bush.
Bothalia 23,2 ( 1993)
283
FIGURE 11. — Community 6: Rhus
pentheri-C us sonia spicata
Low Thicket. Canopy com-
posed of Commiphora har-
veyi, Cussonia spicata, Dom-
beya tiliacea and Euphorbia
triangularis. Location: Effing-
ham Quarries.
General
The most significant feature of this community is the
high proportion of juvenile individuals of particular indi-
genous tree species which define it. The large sapling pres-
ence would seem to indicate past disturbance (and
subsequent regeneration) as an important factor in the
areas where this community type occurs. This is supported
by the presence of Albizia adianthifolia , a known forest
precursor common at forest margins and in open forest
(Ward 1980; Coates Palgrave 1983), in approximately a
third of the sampled sites. A large climber presence/com-
ponent is also indicative of past disturbance (Moll 1976;
Cawood 1980; Tinley 1985). The inclusion of releves lo-
cated in areas such as Virginia Bush within this commu-
nity, which by 1931/1932 had already been totally cleared
for agricultural purposes, may well account for the high
number of saplings in the diagnostic group for this com-
munity, and suggests that the majority of the areas pres-
ently occupied by Community 5 consist of regenerating
examples of this community, rather than less disturbed
sites.
Using Acocks’s (1988) species lists as a guide, this
community is diagnosed by those species he identified as
being characteristic of Typical Coast-belt Forest e.g. Celtis
africana, Chaetacme aristata, Ekebergia capensis and
Protorhus longifolia. There is also a strong floristic cor-
relation between Moll (1976) and Ward’s (1980) descrip-
tion of Coast Forest and the species composition of
Community 5, both at the canopy and subcanopy layer.
A strong floristic link between Community 5 and the
dune communities is indicated by the Rhoicissus
rhomboidea and Ficus burtt-davyi species groups (Appen-
dix .8 & .9) which are common to Communities 3, 4 &
5 and 2, 3 & 5 respectively. The Rhoicissus rhomboidea
species complex describes the indigenous understorey spe-
cies common to both the dune and coastal forest commu-
nities, while the Ficus burtt-davyi species group describes
a common indigenous shrub component present through-
out the dune/coastal forest complex. As with Community
3, Isoglossa woodii is an important component of the field
layer.
This strong association between the two community
types implies that they cannot be treated as separate con-
servation entities, and must be planned and managed to-
gether. The presence of releve 104 within Community 5,
situated as it is in the back dune area, provides further
confirmation of this inter-relatedness, indicating that re-
strictive lines drawn on vegetation maps are distinctly mis-
leading for conservation purposes. Conservationists should
be addressing the minimum critical areas of vegetation
complexes rather than single community types. The Psy-
chotria capensis species group (Appendix .7) alternatively
describes a strong and exclusive association between
Community 4 & 5, not shared by the dune vegetation
(Communities 2 & 3). This is discussed in Community 4.
In Community 5, although both invasive species have
approximately the same average cover (Figure 5), Chro-
molaena odorata* occurs more frequently (Figure 6). The
species diversity is on a par with that in Community 4
(Figure 4), and Community 5 also has a rL structure (Fig-
ure 2E), due to the presence of a clear tree canopy in most
of the sampled areas. The high cover in the 0.5-5.0 m
category could again in part be attributed to invasion by
Chromolaena odorata * and Fontana camara*, and the
presence of saplings.
VALLEY BUSHVELD COMPLEX
Community 6: Rhus pentheri-Cussonia spicata Low
Thicket (Figure 1 1 )
This low thicket community (Edwards 1983) is found
at altitudes of 20-148 m and is associated with the larger
river valleys in the area. It is represented by 18 releves
(Appendix) with 8-33 species per releve. This community
284
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
has a D structure (Ito 1979; Fig. 2F) with the greatest
average cover of 77.1% in the 0.5-5 .0 m height class.
Habitat
The soils underlying this community are diverse and
include the Cartref Form, Cartref Series; Glenrosa Form,
Williamson Series; Katspruit Form, Katspruit Series;
Kroonstad Form, Avoca Series; Milkwood Form, Milk-
wood Series; Shortlands Form, Shortlands Series and
Swartland Form, Swartland Series. Of these the Glenrosa
Williamson soils (5 releves) and Katspruit Katspruit soils
(4 releves) are the most common. The terrain slopes from
4.8° to 39.8° in a variety of directions. All points of an
eight-point compass rose are represented except east;
south is the most common direction and occurs in 5
releves.
Floristics
This community is distinguished by the Rhus pentheri
species group (Appendix .10). The species diversity per
unit area is 0.19 species per rn for the eighteen releves
with an average of 20.9 species per releve.
Trees and shrubs
Percentage occurrence and average cover of Chro-
molaena odorata* and Lantana camara* are:
Chromolaena odorata* ( shrub) 55.6% 26.9%
Lantana camara* (shrub) 16.7% 6.2%
Conspicuous woody species with more than 5% mean
cover and occurring in more than 20% of the releves rep-
resenting the community are:
Herbs
Herb species occurring in more than 20% of the releves
representing the community are:
Cyperus albostriatus (sedge) 27.8% 3.0%
Climbers
Climbers occurring in more than 20% of the releves
representing the community are:
Saplings and seedlings
Saplings and seedlings occurring in more than 20% of
the releves representing the community are:
General
The releves constituting Community 6 are located
along the valley lines associated with river courses. This
is similar to the distribution noted by Acocks (1988) for
his Northern Variation of the Valley Bushveld, and that
noted by Moll (1976) for Dry Valley Scrub and Bushland
Mosaic. Floristically Community 6 corresponds well with
Acocks's (1988) Veld Type 23a — the Northern Variation
of the Valley Bushveld. Note the presence of species such
as Acacia robusta, Cussonia spicata, Euphorbia triangu-
laris and Rhus pentheri. It also shows varying degrees of
floristic similarity with Moll’s (1976) Dry valley Scrub
and Bushland Mosaic (greater) and Acacia sieberiana Sa-
vanna (lesser).
The relationship between this valley bushveld commu-
nity and the dune and coastal components of the Coastal
Forest Complex, i.e. Communities 3, 4 & 5, is indicated
by the common presence of the Chaetacme aristata spe-
cies group (Appendix .11) common to Communities 5 and
6; the Canthium inerme sapling species group (Appendix
.12) common to Communities 4, 5 & 6; and finally the
Uvaria caffra species group (Appendix .13) shared by
Communities 3, 4, 5 & 6. These species groups indicate
a floristic similarity largely in the subcanopy layers be-
tween the two vegetation complexes e.g. Brachylaena
discolor (Appendix .13) and Rhoicissus tomentosa (Ap-
pendix .13).
Thus, although the tree species defining the Valley
Bushveld Complex are, to a large extent, distinct from
those defining the various components of the Coastal For-
est complex, there is still a common subcanopy element
linking the two groups. This is important, as it indicates
the need to establish continuous closed canopy links be-
tween the complexes. Because of the large distances sep-
arating most of the important conservation sites for
Communities 3, 4, 5 & 6 within the city, corridors or
stepping-stone areas capable of supporting viable wooded
communities will therefore be necessary to ensure the ad-
equate conservation and dissemination of these species,
particularly where the species concerned are poor dispers-
ers.
Although there is a large creeper representation in this
community, indigenous saplings and seedlings are not as
prominent a component of the community either in abun-
dance or diagnostic importance as in Communities 4 or
5; only 30.8% of diagnostic species occur as saplings or
seedlings. That disturbance is a critical feature in this com-
munity, however, cannot be doubted and is evident in the
fact that this community has a higher average cover and
percentage occurrence of Chromolaena odorata * than any
of the preceding woody communities. It nevertheless also
has lower levels of Lantana camara* (Figures 5 & 6).
Community 6 shows a marked increase in species di-
versity over that recorded for Community 5 (Figure 4).
This is the highest species diversity shown by any of the
wooded communities in the study. The D-structure of
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
285
Community 6 (Figure 2F) could be attributed to distur-
bance and invasion by Lantana camara* and Chro-
molaena odorata*, sapling establishment, previous tree
felling and the drier conditions which prevail in areas oc-
cupied by Community 6.
Community 7: Dovyalis rhamnoides-Hippobromus
pauciflorus Low Thicket (Figure 12)
This low thicket community (Edwards 1983) is found
at altitudes of between 30 and 140 m. It is represented by
11 releves (Appendix) with 9-31 species per releve. This
community has a D structure (Ito 1979; Figure 2G) with
the greatest average cover of 73.7% in the 0.5-5.0 m
height class.
Habitat
The soils of this community are widely varied and in-
clude the Cartref Form, Cartref Series; Glenrosa Form,
Williamson Series; Flutton Form, Clansthal Series;
Katspruit Form, Katspruit Series; Kroonstad Fonn, Avoca
Series; Longlands Form, Waldene Series; Rensburg Form,
Phoenix Series and Swartland Form, Swartland Series.
The Glenrosa Williamson soils are the most common and
are represented in 3 out of 11 releves. The terrain slopes
from 6.5° to 32° in a generally southerly direction (7 out
of 11 releves).
Floristics
The community is distinguished by the Cissampelos
torulosa species group (Appendix .14). The species diver-
sity per unit area is 0.19 species per irf for the 1 1 releves,
with an average of 21.4 species per releve.
Trees and shrubs
Percentage occurrence and average cover of Chro-
molaena odorata* and Lantana camara * are:
Chromolaena odorata* ( shrub) 81.8% 44.3%
Lantana camara* (shrub) 36.4% 25.4%
Conspicuous woody species with more than 5% mean
cover and occurring in more than 20% of the releves rep-
resenting the community are:
Hippobromus pauciflorus (tree) 27.3% 9.3%
Melia azedarach* (tree) 27.3% 7.7%
Flerbs
Herb species occurring in more than 20% of the releves
representing the community are:
Cyperus albostriatus (sedge)
Scadoxus puniceus (forb)
Setaria megaphylla (grass)
Panicum maximum (grass)
Climbers
Climbers occurring in more than 20% of the releves
representing the community are:
FIGURE 12. — Community 7: Dovy-
alis rhamnoides-Hippobro-
mus pauciflorus Low Thicket.
Canopy composed of Hippo-
bromus pauciflorus, Kraussia
floribunda, Scolopia zeyheri
and Trimeria grandifolia. Lo-
cation: Hulett’s Bush.
286
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
General
In terms of species composition. Community 7 can be
related to Acocks’s (1988) Northern Variation of the Val-
ley Bushveld (note the presence of species such as
Calpumia aurea, Coddia rudis, Hippobromus pauciflorus
and Zanthoxylum capense) and to Moll’s (1976) Dry val-
ley Scrub and Bushland Mosaic (greater extent) and Aca-
cia sieberiana Savanna (lesser extent). Community 7 is
related to Community 6 through the common presence of
the Coddia rudis species group (Appendix .15).
As with Community 6, Community 7 shows associa-
tions with the Coastal Forest Complex, in this instance
through the shared presence of the Calpumia aurea spe-
cies group (Appendix .16) which Community 7 shares in
common with Communities 3, 4, 5 & 6. The Dovyalis
rhamnoides sapling (Appendix .17) and Cyphostemma
hypoleucum (Appendix .18) species group are composed
predominantly of indigenous saplings and provide a broad
lloristic association between Communities 5, 6, 7 & 8 and
3, 4, 5, 6, 7 & 8. This indicates a common level of re-
generation occurring in both the Valley Bushveld and
Coastal Forest Complexes, and strengthens the need for
integrated conservation of all community types.
Community 7 shows a greater degree of disturbance
than Community 6. This is evident in the higher values
for average cover and percentage occurrence of Chro-
inolaena odoratci* and Lantana camara* (Figures 5 & 6),
as well as the greater predominance of seedlings and sap-
lings of various species and the widespread occurrence of
the invasive Melia azedarach* which is characteristic of
early serai stages (Ward 1980). The proportional repre-
sentation by climbers in this community is, however,
greatly reduced. The frequency of occurrence and average
cover of Chromolaena odorata* is the highest for any of
the wooded communities contained in the Coastal Forest
and Valley Bushveld Complexes (Figures 5 & 6). The
percentage occurrence of Chromolaena odorata* within
this community is even higher than for Community 9
which represents the badly invaded shrubland areas of
Durban.
Because of the floristic similarities and the greater
signs of disturbance, it could be that Community 7 is
merely a more disturbed form of Community 6 (i.e. a
preceding serai stage) but, without further study of the
dynamics and inter-relationships of these two vegetation
types, it is not yet possible to investigate this proposal
more fully. It is just as likely that the broad differences
in the diagnostic species of both groups indicate local vari-
ations of the valley bushveld fonn. This is highly proba-
ble, if one considers that Moll (1976) identified three
variations in the woody communities occupying the areas
equivalent to those occupied by Communities 6 and 7 in
this study.
Species diversity for Community 7 is on a par with
that for Community 6 and represents the highest species
diversity values recorded for any of the wooded commu-
nities within the classification table (Figure 4). As with
Community 6 the D structure (Figure 2G) of this com-
munity can be attributed to disturbance, shrub invasion,
felling, a significant sapling layer and possibly to drier
FIGURE 13. — Community 8: Transitional. Represents an encroaching
woody element into grassland communities. Trimeria grandi-
folia sapling in the middleground. The Grassland community is
dominated by ruderal and secondary species such as Eragrostis
cunnila, Digitaria sp., Senecio polyanthemoides and Sorghum
bicolor. Dense clumps of Chromolaena odorata * and Lantana
camara * to the left indicate past disturbance. Location:
Effingham Quarries.
conditions which produce a shorter canopy layer (Moll
1976).
SHRUBLAND COMPLEX
Community 8: Transitional (Figure 13)
This tall closed shrubland//low/short thicket commu-
nity mosaic (Edwards 1983) is found at altitudes of 5-237
m. It is represented by seven releves (Appendix) with 10-
35 species per releve. This community has a D structure
(Ito 1979; Figure 2H) with the greatest average cover of
67.3% in the 0.5-5. 0 m height class, which also contains
a significant grass component.
Habitat
The soils underlying this community are varied and
include the Cartref Form, Cartref Series; Femwood Form,
Fernwood Series; Hutton Form, Clansthal Series;
Katspruit Form, Katspruit Series; Milkwood Form, Milk-
wood Series and Mispah Fonn, Mispah Series. None are
obviously predominant. The terrain slopes from virtually
Hat to 51.3°, the aspect being variable and including all
four points of a four-point rose, with east being the most
common (3 out of 7 releves).
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
287
Floristics
This community is differentiated by the absence of
character species. The species diversity per unit area ave-
rages 0.18 species per rn for the community with an av-
erage of 19.9 species per releve.
Trees and shrubs
Percentage occurrence and average cover of Chromo-
laena odorata* and Lantana camara* are:
Chromolaena odorata* (shrub) 71.4% 35.0%
Lantana camara* (shrub) 71.4% 19.6%
There are no woody species with more than 5% mean
cover and occurring in more than 20% of the releves rep-
resenting the community.
Herbs
Herb species occurring in more than 20% of the releves
representing the community are:
Saplings and seedlings
Saplings and seedlings occurring in more than 20% of
the releves representing the community are:
Dalbergia obovata sapling (tree) 28.6% 1.6%
Heteropyxis natalensis sapling (tree) 28.6% 0.9%
(non-diagnostic species)
General
Except for Communities 9, 12 & 17 the remainder of
the tloristic units represented in the Appendix cannot be
equated with any of the communities described by Acocks
(1988), Moll (1976), Cawood (1980) or Ward (1980). This
means that prior to this study, 44% of the communities
which occur in the municipal area had not been described.
Community 8 marks a transition zone from the valley
bushveld communities represented by Communities 6 &
7 to the disturbed shrubland and grassland communities
of the urban area. The physiognomy and tloristic make-up
of Community 8 indicate that it represents an encroaching
woody element into the disturbed shrublands and grass-
lands of the Appendix represented by Communities 9 and
10. This observation is supported by the high percentage
of saplings present in the Dovyalis rhamnoides sapling
(Appendix .17) and Cyphostemma hypoleucum (Appendix
.18) species groups, and in other species groups with rep-
resentatives in this community e.g. the Hippobromus
pauciflorus (sapling) species group (Appendix .20). All of
the species concerned are indigenous, which indicates the
potential for the re-establishment of natural communities
in these areas. This process of regeneration could be en-
couraged through active management, and where neces-
sary and appropriate such areas could be used to form
links with, or to enlarge core conservation areas of the
more ‘pristine’ communities. Another prominent species
group in this community is the Senecio polyanthemoides
species group (Appendix .39). This group is characterised
by the presence of ruderal and generalist species, some of
which are alien invasives. This supports the concept of an
encroachment dynamic in this transition zone.
That disturbance is a prominent feature of this transi-
tion zone is evident in the high average cover and per-
centage occurrence of both Chromolaena odorata * and
Lantana camara * in this community (Figures 5 & 6).
Community 8 shows an equal percentage occurrence for
Chromolaena odorata * and Lantana camara *, resulting
from a decrease in Chromolaena odorata * and an increase
in Lantana camara* as compared with Community 7 lev-
els (Figure 6). There is a slight decrease in diversity rel-
ative to Community 7 (Figure 4), probably due to
increased levels of disturbance and invasion by alien shrub
species which tend to form large homogeneous stands.
The D structure (Figure 2H) can also be attributed to the
significant alien shrub component and an increased rep-
resentation of grass species in this community.
Community 9: Acacia gerrardii-Rhus chirindensis Tall
Closed Shrubland/Fow/Short Thicket Mosaic
(Figure 14)
This tall closed shrubland//low/short thicket commu-
nity mosaic (Edwards 1983) is found at altitudes of 10-
285 m. It is represented by 64 releves (Appendix) with
2-33 species per releve. This community has a D structure
(Ito 1979; Figure 21) with the greatest average cover of
79.8% in the 0.5-5 .0 m height class. Grass is a significant
component of both the 0-0.5 m and 0.5-5.0 m height
class, a factor which distinguishes it from previous com-
munities.
Habitat
The soils underlying this community are diverse and
include the Cartref Form. Cartref Series; Dundee Form,
Dundee Series; Fernwood Form, Fernwood Series;
Glenrosa Form, Williamson Series; Hutton Form.
Clansthal Series; Katspruit Form, Katspruit Series;
Kroonstad Form, Mkambati Series; Fonglands Form,
Waldene Series; Milkwood Form, Milkwood Series;
Mispah Form, Mispah Series; Rensburg Form, Phoenix
Series and Swartland Form, Swartland Series. The three
most common soils are the Mispah Mispah soils (in 12
releves). Glenrosa Williamson soils (in 9 releves) and Car-
tref Cartref soils (in 8 releves). The terrain occupied by
this community varies from Hat at some sites to an incli-
nation of 39.8° at others, with all eight points of an eight-
point compass rose represented. Northern and southern as-
pects are most common, and are found in 12 and 15
releves respectively.
288
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
FIGURE 14. — Community 9: Acacia
gerrardii-Rhus chirindensis
Tall Closed Shrubland//
Low/Short Thicket Mosaic.
Community 9 is composed
predominantly of dense stands
of Chromolaena odorata* and
Lantana camara *, in this in-
stance interspersed with speci-
mens of Mangifera indica*.
Location: Welbedacht.
Floristics
This community is distinguished by the Maytenus
senegalensis sapling species group (Appendix .19). The
species diversity per unit area averages 0.12 species per
m" for the community, with an average of 13.5 species
per releve; 47.1% of the species diagnostic for this com-
munity type occur as saplings or seedlings.
Trees and shrubs
Percentage occurrence and average cover of Chro-
molaena odorata * and Lantana camara * are:
Chromolaena odorata* (shrub) 79.7% 58.1%
Lantana camara* (shrub) 62.5% 19.2%
The only conspicuous woody species with more than
5% mean cover and occurring in more than 20% of the
releves representing the community is:
Melia azedarach * (tree) 34.4% 9.3%
Herbs
There are no herb species occurring in more than 20%
of the releves representing the community.
Climbers
Climbers occurring in more than 20% of the releves
representing the community are:
Protasparagus virgatus ( climber) 31.3% 0.06%
Dalhergia obovata (tree) 20.3% 7.7%
General
This community can be equated floristically with the
‘heavily disturbed’ areas described by Cawood (1980),
and is characterised by the presence of alien invasive spe-
cies. Community 9 as identified within this study is dom-
inated by three invasive species: Chromolaena odorata *,
Lantana camara * and Melia azedarach *, all of which in-
dicate high levels of disturbance, and early serai commu-
nities (Ward 1980). Concurrent with dominance by alien
species is the low cover and occurrence values for the
indigenous herbs, saplings, seedlings and climbers which
characterise this community (Sukopp & Wemer 1983).
This indicates a generally unfavourable environment cre-
ated by the invasive species, forming stands so dense that
they shade out and out-compete most indigenous species.
Potential for regeneration of the indigenous cover is, how-
ever, indicated by the fact that 47.1% of the species di-
agnostic for this community type are saplings or seedlings
of indigenous species.
The relationship of this community to the Valley
Bushveld Complex and associated shrub community (6,
7 & 8) is shown through the common presence of the
Hippobromus pauciflorus sapling species group (Appen-
dix .20). Community 9 is also associated with the Coastal
Forest Complex through the Protasparagus virgatus spe-
cies group (Appendix .21) common to Communities 5, 6,
7, 8 & 9; and the Isoglossa woodii species group (Ap-
pendix .22) shared by Communities 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 & 9.
These broad floristic associations indicate the widely oc-
curring nature of this invasive shrubland, elements of
which can be found in areas previously occupied by all
the wooded communities described, except the mangrove
communities. This widespread occurrence can be linked
to the broad patterns of disturbance that have characterised
the urban landscape and facilitated the spread of oppor-
tunistic species such as Chromolaena odorata* and Lan-
tana camara*.
It should be noted that the majority of the saplings
which characterise this group would according to Acocks
(1988) be typical of the Northern Variation of the Valley
Bothalia 23,2 ( 1993)
289
Bushveld e.g. Acacia nilotica, Buddleja saligna, Com-
bretum molle , Dalbergia obovata, Hippobromus pauci-
florus, Maytenus heterophylla and Spirostachys africana.
However, the presence of species such as Apodytes
dimidiata, Rhus chirindensis, Trema orientalis and Vitel-
lariopsis marginata also suggests a strong coastal forest
element. These patterns are also reflected in the occur-
rence of shrubs and climbers. This is important because,
by using the sapling component of these shrublands as an
index, it should be possible to assess the nature of the
community that existed in these areas prior to disturbance.
Such an assessment is critical to the future use of disturbed
areas as extensions to existing core areas and as dispersal
corridors within the open space system. Not only will it
provide direction for replanting schemes, but it will serve
to indicate the potential effectiveness of various areas as
links between different community and complex types.
The presence of grass species such as Panicum maximum
and Eragrostis curvula as a marked component of the 0-
0.5 m and 0.5-5 .0 m height class indicates that this com-
munity not only represents wooded areas which have been
disturbed, but probably also represents grassland areas
which have since become invaded and dominated by these
shrub species.
Community 9 shows a marked drop in species diversity
in comparison to Community 8 (Figure 4). This is an im-
portant characteristic of the shmbland complex, i.e. as the
intensity of invasion by species such Chromolaena
odorata* and Lantana camara* increases, so the overall
species diversity within communities decreases. Chro-
molaena odorata * predominates in this community and
shows an increase in both cover and percentage occur-
rence relative to levels in Community 10 (Figures 5 & 6).
In fact, this community has the highest average cover for
Chromolaena odorata * of all the communities sampled.
The cover for Lantana camara *, however, remains the
same as that found in Community 10 and its actual per-
centage occurrence decreases. The D structure (Figure 21)
is due to the predominance of shrub and grass components
in this community.
Community 10: Transitional (Figure 15)
This low/short closed grassland//tall closed shrub-
landZ/low/short thicket community mosaic (Edwards 1983)
is found at altitudes of 5-230 m. It is represented by 21
releves (Appendix) with 4—21 species per releve. This
community has a D structure (Ito 1979; Figure 2J) with
the greatest average cover of 75.2% in the 0.5-5.0 m
height class. This class contains a large shrub component.
Habitat
The soils underlying this community are diverse and
include the Cartref Form, Cartref Series; Dundee Form,
Dundee Series; Fernwood Form, Fernwood Series;
Glenrosa Form, Williamson Series; Hutton Form,
Clansthal Series; Katspruit Form, Katspruit Series;
Kroonstad Form, Mkambati Series; Longlands Form,
Waldene Series; Milkwood Form, Milkwood Series;
Mispah Form, Mispah Series; Rensburg Form, Phoenix
Series and Swartland Form, Swartland Series. The most
common are the Glenrosa Williamson soils (4 releves),
Hutton Clansthal soils (3 releves) and Mispah Mispah
soils (3 releves). The terrain occupied by this community
varies from Hat at some sites to an inclination of 22.6° at
others, with all eight points of an eight-point compass rose
represented except for southeast and southwest. North and
east are the most common aspect, each occurring in 5
releves.
Floristics
This community is characterised by the absence of
character species, but is best represented floristically by
the Mangifera indica* species group (Appendix .23). The
FIGURE 15.— Community 10: Tran-
sitional. The presence of Man-
gifera indica* (remnant of an
old mango plantation) is a sign
of past human disturbance, as
is the presence of species such
as Chromolaena odorata *,
Lantana camara* and Tagetes
minuta*. Predominant grass
species is Panicum maximum.
Location: Newlands West,
along Umgeni River.
290
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
FIGURE 16, — Community 11.
Bothriochloa inscuIpta-Hy-
parrhenia hirta Short Closed
Grassland. Species recorded:
Bothriochloa insculpta, Pa-
nicum maximum, Rhynchely-
trum repens and Sporobolus
africanus. Location: Phoenix.
9
species diversity per unit area is 0.09 species per m~ tor
the community with an average of 10.0 species per releve.
Trees and shrubs
Percentage occurrence and average cover of Chro-
molaena odorata* and Lantana camara* are:
Chromolaena odorata* (shrub) 66.7% 33.0%
Lantana camara* (shrub) 6 1 .9% 27.2%
There are no conspicuous woody species with more
than 5% mean cover and occurring in more than 20% of
the releves representing the community.
Herbs
There is only a single herb species occurring in more
than 20% of the releves representing the community, this
is:
Panicum maximum (grass) 33.3% 16.7%
Saplings and seedlings
The only sapling occurring in more than 20% of the
releves representing the community is:
Psidium guajava* sapling (tree) 23.8% 0.01%
Genera l
As with the other two communities in this complex.
Community 10 is dominated by the two shrub species
Chromolaena odorata* and Lantana camara*. This com-
munity is related to (he coastal forest and valley bushveld
and disturbed shrubland communities (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 &
9) through the common presence of the Mangifera indica*
species group (Appendix .24). This widespread associa-
tion across the table again re-emphasises the ubiquitous
nature and effects of disturbance throughout the urban
landscape. Two species within species group 24,
Mangifera indica* and Syzygium cuminii *, would seem
to indicate past cultivation (Indian market gardening) and
residential development as a factor in disturbance. This
may to a certain extent be confirmed by the presence of
Psidium guajava* seedlings within this community.
Like Community 9, Community 10 is essentially a
shrubland/thicket community, but with a more prominent
grassland component, suggesting that it acts as a transition
between the shrublands dominated by Chromolaena
odorata* and Lantana camara* and the disturbed grass-
land communities that follow on the table. Of the three
communities in the shrubland complex it has the lowest
species diversity (Figure 4), and is only higher on the
diversity index than the mangrove and foredune commu-
nities, where exposure and harsh environmental conditions
are responsible for limiting species diversity. Community
10 also sees a marked fall in the average cover and per-
centage occurrence of Chromolaena odorata*, and a rise
in the average cover of Lantana camara* although its
percentage occurrence is the same as in Community 9
(Figures 5 & 6). The low species diversity of this com-
munity can be associated with the extensive presence of
both Chromolaena odorata* and Lantana camara*. As
with the other disturbed communities, the D structure is
due to the strong shrub component and increasingly high
levels of grass with the community.
The low species diversity of this community combined
with the overall predominance of ruderal, invasive and
alien species, provides little indication of the indigenous
regeneration noted in Communities 8 and 9. In Commu-
nity 10 all trace of the previous vegetation layer has been
removed and altered. Any restoration of these areas will
therefore have to rely on informed guesswork, using a
knowledge of the location of the area and the surrounding
community types.
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
291
GRASSLAND COMPLEX
Community 11: Bothriochloa insculpta-Hyparrhenia
hirta Short Closed Grassland (Figure 16)
This short/closed grassland community (Edwards
1983) is found at altitudes of 26-117 m. It is represented
by 9 releves (Appendix) with 6-19 species per releve.
This community has a D structure (Ito 1979; Figure 2K)
with the greatest average cover of 74.2% in the 0.5-5.0
m height class. No vegetation above 5 m occurs in this
community type.
Habitat
The soils underlying this community are of three types,
the Glenrosa Form, Williamson Series; Milkwood Form,
Milkwood Series and Mispah Form, Mispah Series. All
are equally common. The terrain occupied by this com-
munity varies in inclination from 3.8°-26.6° in the fol-
lowing directions: northeast, southeast, south, northwest
and north. East is the most common aspect occurring in
3 out of the 9 releves.
FI ori sties
This community is distinguished by the Bothriochloa
insculpta species group (Appendix .24). The species di-
versity per unit area is 0.11 species per nT for the nine
releves, with an average of 12.6 species per releve.
Trees and shrubs
Percentage occurrence and average cover of Chro-
molaena odorata* and Lantana camara * are:
Chromolaena odorata* (shrub) 22.2% 18.6%
Lantana camara* (shrub) 22.2% 3.8%
There are no conspicuous woody species with more
than 5% mean cover and occurring in more than 20% of
the releves representing the community.
Herbs
Herb species occuning in more than 20% of the releves
representing the community are:
General
The lack of a significant floristic association between
Community 11 and the preceding communities on the Ap-
pendix, indicates a distinct floristic break between the
woody components of the shrubland, thicket and forest
contained in Communities 1-10, and the distinct grassland
forms which begin with Community 1 1 . The predomi-
nance of the perennial Bothriochloa insculpta in Commu-
nity 1 1 indicates that the areas where this grassland occurs
have generally been subjected to conditions of 'over-
utilisation, trampling and bad management" (Tainton et al.
1976). Tainton (1981a) regards Bothriochloa insculpta as
an Increaser II species. This is one of four possible classes:
Decreaser species: those which dominate in veld which
is in good condition and which decline in abundance when
veld deteriorates in condition;
Increaser I species: those which are not abundant in
veld which is in good condition, but which increase when
the veld is under-utilised;
Increaser II species: those which are not abundant in
veld of good condition, but which increase when veld is
over-utilised;
Increaser III species: those which are not abundant in
the veld which is in good condition, but which increase
when the veld is selectively grazed.
Other species such as Cynodon dactylon (Increaser II),
Eragrostis curvula (Increaser II), Hyparrlienia hirta (In-
creaser II), Rhynchelytrum repens (Increaser II) and
Sporobolus africanus (Increaser II) are also good indica-
tors of previous disturbance (particularly cultivation),
over-utilisation or mismanagement (Tainton et al. 1976,
1981b; Ward 1980). Bayer (1955) goes so far as to de-
scribe grassland types for Natal as ‘subseral grasslands of
old fields’. The presence of Panicum maximum in signif-
icant amounts in this community, a Decreaser species,
however, suggests a possible improvement in veld condi-
tion.
This is supported by Tainton et al. (1976) assertion that
when such deteriorated veld is rested, Bothriochloa in-
sculpta may increase to the extent of dominance and assist
in the restoration of a 'productive cover of mixed
composition’. The predominance of perennial species and
species such as Bothriochloa insculpta in Community 11,
thus indicate both good soil protection and the potential
for the regeneration of a better quality and a more diverse
community. These grassland sites should therefore be as-
signed a high conservation value. The presence of
Leucaena leucocephala* as a diagnostic species for this
community and Psidium guajava * saplings in 20% of the
samples, however, indicates the potential for woody en-
croachment by invasive species which must be carefully
monitored.
This community shows no affiliation with the coastal
forest, valley bushveld or shrubland complexes except
through the generalist species groups e.g. the Tagetes
minuta* species group (Appendix .35). Within the ecologi-
cal/floristic gradient represented by the table. Community
292
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
11 is also clearly separated from the remainder of the
grasslands in the municipal area, i.e. Communities 13 to
18, except at the most generalised levels where the asso-
ciation is largely due to a common level of disturbance
rather than floristically meaningful interrelationships, e.g.
the Senecio polyanthemoides species group (Appendix
.39) and the Chaetacanthus burchellii species group (Ap-
pendix .45). The reason for this distinctiveness is difficult
to ascertain, for as far as could be determined there has
been no significant variation in the disturbance pattern
experienced in areas occupied by Community 11 when
compared with the other secondary grasslands in munici-
pal Durban. It is therefore important that viable units of
this grassland type are conserved and carefully monitored
in order to clarify the causal factors underlying their floris-
tic distinctness. Community 1 1 is associated with the wet-
lands/floodplains (Community 12) and disturbed grass-
lands (Community 13) through the Mariscus sumatrensis
species group (Appendix .28). The species composition
of this group, however, also suggests that this similarity
is the result of a common element of disturbance, rather
than the existence of a similar moisture regime.
Community 1 1 shows levels of Chromolaena odomta*
and Lantana camara* well below those evident in Com-
munity 10. There is a marked decrease in both the average
cover values and percentage occurrence for these species
(Figure 5 & 6). This indicates an improved community
condition as does the higher species diversity in this com-
munity (Figure 4). Community 1 1 does, however, have
the highest Chromolaena odorata * values of all the grass-
lands, but has the second lowest values of Lantana
camara*. Note that there is no representation in the >5
m category due to the predominant grass component
which also accounts for the D structure of the community
(Figure 2K).
Community 12: Phragmites australis-Cyperus immen-
sus Short Closed Grassland//Tall/High Closed Shrub-
land//Tall Closed Reedbed Mosaic (Figure 17)
This short closed grassland//tall/high closed shrub-
land//tall closed reedbed community mosaic (Edwards
1983) occurs at altitudes of 5-55 m. It is represented by
18 releves (Appendix), with 4—21 species per releve. This
community has a D structure (Ito 1979; Figure 2L) with
the greatest average cover of 79.6% in the 0.5-5 .0 m
height class. Both the 0.5-5.0 m height class and the >5
m height class consists predominantly of reeds.
Habitat
The soils underlying this reedbed community are pre-
dominantly of the Dundee Form, Dundee Series; Katspruit
Form, Katspruit Series and Rensburg Form, Phoenix Se-
ries. Several fill sites are also noted within this community
type in areas such as the harbour and airport (i.e. areas
of recent alluvial deposits). The Dundee Dundee soils are
by far the most common occurring in 13 of the 18 releves.
The terrain occupied by this community varies from gen-
erally flat to an inclination of 32.0° in the following di-
rections: northeast, east, southwest, west, northwest and
north. East is the most common aspect occurring in 8 out
of the 18 releves.
Floristics
This community is distinguished by the Phragmites
australis species group (Appendix .25). The species di-
versity per unit area is 0.11 species per m" for the 18
releves, with an average of 11.8 species per releve.
FIGURE 17.— Community 12:
Phragmites australis-Cype-
rus immensus Short Closed
Grassland//Tall/High Closed
Shrubland//Tall Closed Reed-
bed Mosaic. Species along
riverbank: Cyperus immensus
and Phragmites australis. Pre-
sence of several alien invasive
species in floodplain e.g.
Chromolaena odorata*, Lan-
tana camara* and Schinus
terebinthifolius* , and larger
Pennisetum sp.* reeds in back-
ground. Location: Umhlange
River floodplain near the
Northern Waste Water Treat-
ment Works.
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
293
Trees and shrubs
Climbers
Climbers present in more than 20% of releves are:
Ipomoea cairica (forb) 27.8% 22.3%
Cardiospermum grandiflorum* (climber) 22.2% 22.2%
General
This floristic grouping describes the wetland commu-
nities in the Durban area. The majority of the sites repre:
sented by this community are floodplain sites, as most
other wetland areas in municipal Durban have been
drained and filled. The floristic composition of the diag-
nostic species group i.e. the Phragmites australis species
group (Appendix .25), clearly illustrates the dominance of
reeds within this community. The general floristic com-
position of Community 12 accords well with that provided
by Ward (1980) for ‘reedswamp communities’.
Community 12. like Community 11, represents a
unique floristic unit. The majority of the floristic similar-
ities demonstrated by Community 12 indicate similarities
in disturbance regimes rather than fundamental ecological
similarities. Community 12 is related to Community 13
through the shared presence of the Verbena bonariensis*
species group (Appendix .27). It is also related to the
grasslands of Community 11 and Community 13 through
the shared presence of the Mariscus sumatrensis species
group (Appendix .28). The species composition of these
differential groups indicates the nature of these floristic
associations, as the majority of the species are ruderal
and/or invasive species.
Community 12 is also related to the disturbed shrub-
lands of Community 9 & 10, as well as Community 13
through the shared presence of the Cynodon dactylon spe-
cies group (Appendix .29). Fifty per cent of the species
within the Cynodon dactylon species group (Appendix
.29) are alien and characteristic of badly disturbed areas.
e.g. the garden escapees Ageratum conyzoides * and Can-
na generalise. This again indicates that these floristic sim-
ilarities are largely due to common disturbance regimes
rather than any fundamental ecological similarities be-
tween the community types. Many of the alien species in
these shared species groups favour the moister conditions
offered in the floodplain regions e.g. Ageratum cony-
zoides*, Canna generalis* , Paspalum urvillei*, Penni-
setum purpureum* and Senna didymobotrya* .
General connections are also indicated between Com-
munity 12 and Communities 5, 7, 9, 10 & 13 through the
shared presence of the Melia azedarach * species group
(Appendix .30). Again the floristic relationship is a super-
ficial one, indicating the shared presence of several gen-
eralist (and for the most part, alien) species which are
widespread throughout the disturbed areas of the urban
landscape and which proliferate under the disturbed con-
ditions found in many of the floodplain and wetland areas.
This is clearly indicative of a situation where bona fide
floristic links may well have been obscured by the over-
riding effects of disturbance.
Both the average cover and percentage occurrence of
Chromolaena odorata * and Lantana camara * in Commu-
nity 12 are lower than those for Community 11 (Figures
5 & 6), with both species achieving only minimal repre-
sentation within this community, despite the fact that many
of these areas have been extensively disturbed in the past.
This could be due to the damper conditions experienced
in these areas. Diversity is on a par with Community 1 1
(Figure 4) and the D structure of the community (Figure
2L) is due to the predominance of reeds and grasses.
Community 13: Senecio madagascariensis-Panicum
maximum Tall Closed Shrubland//Short Closed Grass-
land Mosaic (Figure 18)
This closed tall closed shrubland//short closed grass-
land community mosaic (Edwards 1983) is found at alti-
tudes of 1-287 m. It is represented by 69 releves
(Appendix) with 2^14 species per releve. This community
has a D structure (Ito 1979; Figure 2M) with the greatest
average cover in the 0.5-5.0 m height class of 72.4%
which contains a high proportion of grass. The 0-0.5 m
height class also contains significant levels of grass.
Habitat
The soils underlying this community are diverse and
include the Arcadia Form. Rydalvale Series; Cartref Form.
Caitref Series; Dundee Form. Dundee Series; Femwood
Form. Fernwood Series; Glenrosa Form, Williamson Se-
ries; Hutton Form, Clansthal Series; Katspruit Form,
Katspruit Series; Kroonstad Form, Mkambati Series;
Longlands Form, Waldene Series; Milkwood Form, Milk-
wood Series; Mispah Form. Mispah Series; Rensburg
Form, Phoenix Series and several areas of landfill. The
four most common are the Mispah Mispah soils (12
releves), the Cartref Cartref soils (11 releves), fill sites (10
releves) and Dundee Dundee soils (9 releves). The terrain
occupied by this community varies from flat at some sites
to an inclination of 39.8° at others, with all eight points
of an eight-point compass rose represented. The most
294
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
FIGURE 18. — Community 13: Sene-
cio madagascariensis-Pani-
cum maximum Tall Closed
Shrubland//Short Closed
Grassland Mosaic. Most ubi-
quitous community, ranges
from grassland through to a va-
riety of shrub-invaded types.
Species recorded: Eragrostis
curvula, Flaveria bidentis*,
Leucaena leucocephala*,
Panicum maximum, Rhyn-
chelytrum repens and Senecio
chrysocoma. Location: Bay-
head grassland.
common directions are east (20 releves), north (14 releves)
south (11 releves) and west (10 releves).
Floristics
This community is defined by the Senecio mada-
gascariensis species group (Appendix .26). The species
diversity per unit area averages 0.15 species per in" for
the 69 releves, with an average of 17.0 species per releve.
Trees and shrubs
Percentage occurrence and average cover of Chro-
molaena odorata* and Lantana camara* are:
Lantana camara * (shrub) 49.3% 14.9%
Chromolaena odorata * (shrub) 36.2% 9.6%
There are no conspicuous woody species with more
than 5% mean cover and occurring in more than 20% of
the releves representing the community.
Herbs
Herb species occurring in more than 20% of the releves
representing the community are:
Climbers
The only climber present in more than 20% of releves
is:
Hewittia sublobata ( forb) 24.6% 2.9%
General
This community represents disturbed grassland areas,
and is the most widespread community in the municipal
area. The disturbed nature of the this community is clearly
indicated by the fact that 44% of the diagnostic species
in the Senecio madagascariensis species group (Appendix
.26) are alien species. The grass species which dominate
Community 1 3 are widely distributed species and are par-
ticularly common in disturbed areas (Tainton et al. 1976).
The increased levels of cover and occurrence of perennial
species such as Cynodon dactylon (Increaser II) and
Eragrostis curvula (Increaser II) relative to Community
1 1 also indicate the poorer comparative quality of the
sward, as these are usually predominant in highly dis-
turbed areas. The widespread nature and relatively high
average cover of the annual Rhynchelytrum repens (In-
creaser 11), may also pose erosion problems because of
inadequate soil protection (Tainton et al. 1976).
Community 13 is related to the wetlands i.e. Commu-
nity 12 through the shared presence of the Verbena
bonariensis * species group (Appendix .27). These two
communities in turn are related to Community 1 1 through
the shared presence of the Mariscus sumatrensis species
group (Appendix .28). Its broad relationship with Com-
munities 9, 10 & 12 is indicated through the shared pre-
sence of the Cynodon dactylon species group (Appendix
.29). Floristic associations with the dune communities
(Community 3), coast forest (Community 5), valley
bushveld (Community 7), disturbed shrublands (Com-
munities 8, 9 & 10) and wetlands (Community 12) is in-
dicated through the common presence of the Melia
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
295
azedarach* species group (Appendix .30) and the Setaria
megaphylla species group (Appendix .31). These species
groups indicate the presence of widespread generalists
(both alien and indigenous) such as Ipomoea sp. and Car-
diospermum grandiflorum* , which occur in all these com-
munities as a result of disturbance throughout the urban
landscape. The result is a blurring of floristic boundaries
and, any ‘true' distinctness which once might have existed,
is now largely obscured.
Although Community 13 is clearly a product of dis-
turbance, the average cover and percentage occurrence of
Chromolaena odorata* and Lantana camara* are signif-
icantly lower than those found in communities such as 8,
9 & 10 (but higher than those found in Communities 1 1
& 12, Figures 5 & 6). Lantana camara * has the highest
average cover values and is the most widespread of the
two species. It is probable that Community 13 thus rep-
resents areas where disturbed grasslands have been in-
vaded by these two species (Ward 1980; Liggitt 1983). It
is likely that without intervention the invasive shrub spe-
cies already well represented in this community will con-
tinue to encroach further, eventually making Communities
9 & 13 indistinguishable.
Woody encroachment is also suggested by the presence
of species such as Dichrostachys cinerea, Dichrostachys
cinerea sapling. Morns sp.*, Pseudarthria hookeri sapling
and Rhus chirindensis sapling, within the Cynodon
dactylon species group (Appendix .29). Species such as
Dichrostachys cinerea are well known invaders of open
grassland (Ward 1980), and confirm the idea of an element
of woody encroachment into the grassland areas found in
Communities 9, 10, 11, 12 & 13. This is further supported
by the presence of Clerodendrum glabrum sapling, Melia
azedarach * and Melia azedarach* seedlings in the Melia
azedarach * species group (Appendix .30). Melia
azedarach * particularly is an important element in the
early serai stages of woodland and forest communities in
the Durban area (Ward 1980). The species diversity of
Community 13 is far higher than that for Community 12
(Figure 4) and can be attributed to the large number of
alien species found within this community. The D struc-
ture (Figure 2M) is due to the predominance of shrub,
grass and forb species.
Community 14: Phyllanthus burchellii-Digitaria
eriantha Short Closed Grassland//Tall Sparse/Closed
Shrubland Mosaic (Figures 19 & 20)
This short closed grassland//tall sparse/closed shrub-
land community mosaic (Edwards 1983) is found at alti-
tudes of 35-170 m. It is represented by twenty releves
(Appendix) with 7^15 species per releve. It has a D struc-
ture (Ito 1979; Figure 2N) with the greatest average cover
of 86.0% in the 0.5-5. 0 m height class. This group is
made up predominantly of grasses. No vegetation cover
in this community is above 5 m in height.
Habitat
The soils underlying this community are of the Cartref
Form, Cartref Series; Glenrosa Form, Williamson Series;
Hutton Form, Clansthal Series; Kroonstad Form, Avoca
Series; Kroonstad Form, Mkambati Series; Mispah Form.
Mispah Series; Rensburg Form, Phoenix Series and Swart-
land Form, Swartland Series. The most common are the
Hutton Clansthal soils (5 releves) and the Kroonstad
Mkambati soils (4 releves). The terrain occupied by this
community varies from flat at some sites to an inclination
of 22.6° at others. All eight points of an eight-point com-
pass rose are represented, except northwest. An easterly
direction is most common (6 releves).
Floristics
This community is distinguished by the Phyllanthus
burchellii species group (Appendix .32). The species di-
versity per unit area averages 0.21 species per m“ for the
community, with an average of 23.5 species per releve.
FIGURE 19. — Community 14: Phyl-
lanthus burchellii-Digitaria
eriantha Short Closed Grass-
land//Tall Sparse/Closed
Shrubland Mosaic. Wide vari-
ation in diversity of herb layer
evident in these grasslands.
Species-rich Treasure Beach
Grasslands — Acalypha petio-
laris, Digitaria eriantha, Eu-
genia albanensis, Glycine
wightii, Helichrysum decor-
um, Helichrysum kraussii,
Helichrysum panduratum,
Phyllanthus burchellii, Rumex
sagittatus, Salacia kraussii
and Thesium goetzeanum.
Strelitzia nicholai in back-
ground.
296
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
:
Trees and shrubs
Percentage occurrence and average cover of Chro-
molaena odorata* and Lantana camara* are:
Lantana camara* (shrub) 60.0% 9.8%
Chromolaena odorata* (shrub) 35.0% 10.5%
There are no conspicuous woody species with more
than 5% mean cover and occurring in more than 20% of
the releves representing the community.
Herbs
Herb species occurring in more than 20% of the releves
representing the community are:
FIGURE 20. — Community 14: Phyl-
lanthus burchellii-Digitaria
eriantha Short Closed Grass-
land//Tall Sparse/Closed
Shrubland Mosaic. Wide vari-
ation in diversity of herb layer
evident in these grasslands.
Depauperate grasslands of old
Phoenix caneland — Bidens
pilosa*, Digitaria eriantha,
Panicum maximum, Rhynche-
lytrum repens, Sesbania ses-
ban and Tagetes minuta*. Sac-
charum officinarum* in back-
ground indicates past culti-
vation of site.
Desmodium incanum (forb)
Richardia brasiliensis* (forb)
Cheilanthes viridis (fern)
Climbers
The only climber present in more than 20% of releves
is:
Hewittia sublobata ( forb) 25.0% 10.0%
Saplings and seedlings
Saplings and seedlings occurring in more than 20% of
the releves representing the community are:
Melia azedarach* sapling (tree) 25.0% 0.6%
Albizia adianthifolia sapling (tree) 20.0% 4.6%
Tagetes minuta* seedlings (forb) 20.0% 0.4%
General
Other than the recently burned grasslands represented
by Community 16, where the herb diversity would be ex-
pected to be high, Community 14 has the highest forb
diversity of all the grasslands identified in this study. It
also has the second highest overall species diversity of all
the communities surveyed. As is the case with Community
13, the diagnostic species group for this community, the
Phyllanthus burchellii species group (Appendix .32), is
dominated by forb species indicating that it is on the basis
of the forb component rather than the grass sward that
grasslands are distinguished. The better quality of the
Community 14 grasslands, as compared to those included
within Community 13, is highlighted by the fact that only
18.8% of the diagnostic species for Community 14 are
alien, as compared to the 44.4% of Community 13.
As with Communities 11 & 13, Panicum maximum
(Decreaser) and Eragrostis curvula (Increaser II) form a
major component of the sward in Community 14. Era-
grostis cunmla in particular is indicative of disturbance
20.0% 0.1%
20.0% 0.06%
20.0% 0.05%
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
297
and badly managed areas. The occurrence and cover of
Rhynchelytrum repens (Increaser II) is virtually identical
to that found in Community 13 and could represent an
erosion hazard in badly managed or impacted areas.
Aristida junciformis (Increaser III), Cymbopogon validus
(Increaser I) and Digitaria eriantha (Decreaser) appear for
the first time as major grassland constituents. Digitaria
eriantha is one of the most visible components of this
grassland type, and together with the high cover values
for Panicum maximum, another Decreaser species, indi-
cates an improving sward quality. The presence of a wide
range of grass types, i.e. Decreasers, Increaser I, Increaser
II and Increaser III suggests that areas included within this
community show a range of disturbance regimes ranging
from under- to over-utilisation.
The presence of the pioneer species Aristida junci-
formis has important management implications because of
the difficulty in eradicating it from the sward, and its ten-
dency to dominate under conditions of disturbance. The
presence of Hyparrhenia hirta also suggests a history of
past disturbance, as this species usually predominates on
‘old-land sites’ (Tainton et al. 1976). The presence of
Saccharum officinarum* in the diagnostic species for
Community 14 confirms that cultivation was an important
source of disturbance. This observation is supported by
the widespread occurrence of Community 14 in the old
caneland areas of Phoenix.
This community shows an increase in the forb and
grass component and a decrease in the shrub component
when compared with Community 13. However, woody
encroachment is an ever-present threat as indicated by the
presence of Lantana camara* seedlings in the Conyza
floribunda* species group (Appendix .33), which is shared
by Communities 12, 13 & 14. This is further confirmed
by the presence of Chrysanthemoides monilifera and
Melia azedarach* sapling in the Tagetes minuta* species
group (Appendix .35), which is shared by Communities
3 and 5-13. Albizia adianthifolia saplings are also present
within a fifth of the releves defining Community 14. Al-
bizia adianthifolia is noted by Ward (1980) as ‘an invader
of grassland, often dominant in woodland serai to forest’.
It is important to realise that while the overall herb
diversity of this community is high, there is a gradient of
diversity within the community itself. This ranges from
the relatively depauperate old canefields of the Phoenix
area, to the species-rich grasslands at Treasure Beach. This
difference is probably best related to the timescale of dis-
turbance and the level of active management that has been
operative in these areas.
Community 14 shows strong floristic links with Com-
munity 13 and Community 12 (wetlands/floodplains)
through the shared presence of the Conyza floribunda *
species group (Appendix .33). The species composition of
this group indicates the presence of damp conditions in
all of these communities through the shared presence of
species such as Andropogon eucomus, Cyperus distans,
Cyperus sphaerospermus, Imperata cylindrica and Py-
creus polystachyos, which are characteristic of badly
drained areas. It is related to Communities 10, 11 & 13
through the shared presence of the Cassia mimosoides
species group (Appendix .34), which does not occur in
the wetland areas and is more characteristic of open grass-
land areas. A broad association between Community 14
and the remainder of the communities so far described
(except for Communities 1, 2 & 4) is demonstrated by
the shared presence of the Tagetes minuta * species group
(Appendix .35). The fact that the species in this group are
predominantly indigenous indicates a common floristic
link extending throughout the herb layer of the urban land-
scape. Most of these species are generalists, and are com-
mon in disturbed areas, but this commonality does
FIGURE 21. — Community 15: Sutera
kraussiana-A ristida juncifor-
mis Low/Short Closed Grass-
land. Note sward dominated
by Aristida junciformis. Other
species recorded: Cassia mi-
mosoides, Crotalaria lanceo-
lata, Desmodium incanum,
Helichrysum sp., Indigofera
hilaris, Rhynchelytrum re-
pens, Sporobolus africanus
and Teramnus labialis. Loca-
tion: Welbedacht.
298
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
reinforce the concept of landscape- as opposed to com-
munity-based conservation.
The average cover for Lantana camara* in Community
14 is lower than the equivalent levels found in Community
1 3, but demonstrates a higher percentage occurrence. The
reverse situation exists for Chromolaena odorata* (Fig-
ures 5 & 6). Community 14 has the highest percentage
occurrence of Lantana camara * of all the grasslands, sug-
gesting that this shrub may pose a potentially severe en-
croachment problem in this community. Because of the
extensive herb complement within this community. Com-
munity 14 has the highest species diversity of any com-
munity (other than the recently burned grasslands of
Community 16, Figure 4). The lack of cover in the >5 m
height class and the D structure of the community (Figure
2N) is due to the predominance of forb and grass species
in this community.
Community 15: Sutera kraussiana-Aristida
junciformis Low/Short Closed Grassland (Figure 21)
This low/short closed grassland community (Edwards
1983) is found at altitudes of 5-332 m. It is represented
by 18 releves (Appendix) with 7-34 species per releve.
This community has a D structure (Ito 1979; Figure 20)
with the greatest average cover of 52.7% in the 0.5-5. 0
m height class. This is a more open grassland community
than Community 14.
Habitat
The soils underlying this community include the Car-
tref Form, Cartref Series; Femwood Form, Femwood Se-
ries; Glenrosa Form, Williamson Series; Hutton Form,
Clansthal Series; Katspruit Form, Katspruit Series;
Kroonstad Form, Avoca Series; Longlands Form, Waldene
Series; Milkwood Form, Milkwood Series and Mispah
Form, Mispah Series. The Mispah Mispah soils are the
most common occurring in 7 out of 18 releves. The terrain
occupied by this community varies from flat at some sites
to an inclination of 26.6° at others, in an east, southeast,
south, west, and northwest direction. Of these, east and
south are the most common occurring in 5 releves each.
Floristics
This community is distinguished by the Oxalis
latifolia* species group (Appendix .36). The species di-
versity averages 0.13 species per mz for the community
with an average of 14.8 species per releve.
Trees and shrubs
Percentage occurrence and average cover of Chro-
molaena odorata* and Lantana camara* are:
Lantana camara* (shrub) 38.9% 5.3%
Chromolaena odorata * (shrub) 3.3% 14.9%
There are no conspicuous woody species with more
than 5% mean cover and occurring in more than 20% of
the releves representing the community.
Herbs
Herb species occurring in more than 20% of the releves
representing the community are:
General
Community 15 demonstrates a limited association with
Community 14 through the common presence of the Lo-
belia erinus species group (Appendix .37). A more sig-
nificant association with the two grassland Communities
13 & 14, is indicated by the common presence of the
Digitaria eriantha species group (Appendix .38). This
suggests the existence of a range of indigenous grasses
and forbs common to these three major grassland types
in the urban area, and reinforces the need for ecological
continuity between communities. A broad association with
all of the previously discussed communities except the
mangroves (Community 1) is indicated by the common
presence of the Senecio polyanthemoides species group
(Appendix .39).
This group is dominated by generalists, opportunists,
invasive and pioneer species and serves to re-emphasise
the fact that disturbance throughout the municipal land-
scape has blurred the original floristic boundaries by pro-
viding conditions ideally suited to the proliferation of
these r-selected species. The problem of woody encroach-
ment into the grassland areas is again highlighted through
the presence of Albizia adianthifolia, Chromolaena
odorata* and Psidium guajava* in the Senecio poly-
anthemoides species group (Appendix .39).
An important characteristic of Community 15 is the
marked drop in species diversity as compared to Commu-
nity 14 (Figure 4). This is the result of a decrease in the
diversity of the forb layer. This is also accompanied by a
decrease in the diversity of the grass sward and an in-
crease in the cover of grass species such as Aristida
junciformis (Increaser III), Eragrostis curvula (Increaser
II) and Hyparrhenia hirta (Increaser II) (all relative to
Community 14). These species (particularly the predom-
inance of Aristida junciformis in many areas) suggest pre-
vious mismanagement and disturbance through over-
grazing and poor agricultural practices (Tainton 1981b).
Of all the grassland communities sampled, Community
15 has the highest cover values for Aristida junciformis,
and the second highest cover values for Eragrostis curvula
and Sporobolus africqnus.
Further confirmation of disturbance is provided by the
significant presence of the two invasive shrub species
Chromolaena odorata* and Lantana camara*. Relative
to Community 14 the average cover of Chromolaena
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
299
FIGURE 22. — Community 16: Hy-
poxis gerrardii-Alloteropsis
semialata Low Closed Grass-
land. Species recorded in-
clude: Berkheya speciosa, Cy-
perus obtiisiflorus, Helichry-
sum sp. and Hypoxis sp. Lo-
cation: Silverglen Nature Re-
serve.
odorata* increases and that of Lantana camara* decreases
(Figure 5) The percentage occurrence of both species de-
creases (Figure 6). The D structure of this community
(Figure 20) is due to the predominance of grass species.
Community 16: Hypoxis gerrardii-Alloteropsis semi-
alata Low Closed Grassland (Figure 22)
This low closed grassland community (Edwards 1983)
is found at altitudes of 128-157 m. It is represented by
two releves (Appendix) with 19-39 species per releve.
This community has a L structure (Ito 1979; Figure 2P)
with the greatest average cover of 76.0% in the 0-0.5 m
height class. There is no representation in the upper height
classes of 0.5-5.0 m and greater than 5 m.
Habitat
The soils are of the Cartref Form, Cartref Series, and
are derived from Natal Group Sandstone. The terrain
slopes from 10.9° to 15.5° in a southerly direction.
Floristics
This community is distinguished by the Alepidea sp.
species group (Appendix .40). The species diversity per
unit area is 0.26 species per nr for the two releves, with
an average of 29.0 species per releve.
Trees and shrubs
Percentage occurrence and average cover of Chro-
molaena odorata * and Lantana camara * are:
Lantana camara * (shrub) 0.0% 0.0%
Chromolaena odorata * (shrub) 0.0% 0.0%
There are no conspicuous woody species with more
than 5% mean cover and occurring in more than 20% of
the releves representing the community.
Herbs
Herb species occurring in more than 20% of the releves
representing the community are:
Diagnostic
300
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
General
The number of herb species in this community is very
high compared to the levels exhibited by the other grass-
land communities identified in the study. This is linked
to the fact that this community is defined by only two
releves and represents newly burned grassland areas. The
occurrence of geophytes such as Hypoxis gerrardii within
the diagnostic species is evidence of this latter fact. It is
proposed that Community 16 represents the burned form
of Community 17. This is suggested by the strong floristic
similarity between these two communities indicated by
the Helichrysum cephaloideum species group (Appendix
.42), and the fact that Community 17 predominates in
Silverglen Nature Reserve, the area in which the two
releves defining this community were sampled.
Community 16 is related to grassland Communities 13,
14, 15 & 17 through the shared presence of the Heli-
chrysum cephaloideum species group (Appendix .42). The
presence of Themeda triandra in this group would seem
to indicate that this floristic similarity may be the result
of these communities representing various levels of dis-
turbance (and recovery?) of the original Themeda triandra
sward which predominated prior to the advent of agricul-
ture and urbanisation (Moll 1976). The association be-
tween Community 13 and Communities 14—17 at this
level is slight, probably indicating a far greater level
and/or frequency of disturbance in Community 13.
Of all the communities, 16 has the highest overall spe-
cies diversity (due to the presence of an extensive forb
component) (Figure 4), which points to the importance of
fire as a management tool in maintaining the quality of
grassland areas (Figures 5 & 6). The lack of woody spe-
cies, especially Chromolaena odorata * and Lantana
camara *, also indicates the value of fire in maintaining
grassland areas and reducing the threat of woody en-
croachment.
In terms of sward composition the occurrence and
comparatively high cover of Rhynchelytrum repens (In-
creaser II) could represent an erosion hazard in badly
managed or impacted areas. The presence of the pioneer
species Aristida junciformis (Increaser III) also has im-
portant management implications because of the difficulty
in eradicating it from the sward and its tendency to dom-
inate under conditions of disturbance. The presence of
species such as Alloteropsis semialata (Increaser I), Eu-
lalia villosa (Increaser I) and Tristachya leucothrix iden-
tified by Tainton & Mentis (1984) as a post-fire climax
species are significant, as they indicate that these grass-
lands have been under-utilised, resulting in accumulation
of dry material and the grassland becoming moribund. The
L structure of this community (Figure 2P) can be attrib-
uted to the recent bum in these areas.
Community 17: Helichrysum aureum-Themeda
triandra Short Closed Grassland (Figure 23)
This short closed grassland community (Edwards
1983) is found at altitudes of 83-133 m. It is represented
by seven releves (Appendix) with 7-31 species per releve.
This community has a D structure (Ito 1979; Figure 2Q)
with the greatest average cover of 75.0% in the 0.5-5.0
m height class. This is composed predominantly of grass.
Habitat
The soils are mainly of the Cartref Form, Cartref Series
(4 out of 7 releves). Also present are soils of the Hutton
Form, Clansthal Series; Milkwood Form, Milkwood Se-
ries and Mispah Form, Mispah Series. The terrain occu-
pied by this community slopes from 7.5°-32.0°, in an
northeastern, southeastern, southern and northern direc-
tion. Of these north is the most common aspect occurring
in 4 out of 7 releves.
FIGURE 23. — Community 17: Heli-
chrysum aureum-Themeda
triandra Short Closed Grass-
land. Species recorded: Digi-
taria sp., Helichrysum auri-
ceps, Setaria sphacelata and
Themeda triandra. Location:
Stainbank Nature Reserve.
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
301
FIGURE 24. — Community 18: Dian-
thus zeyheri-Eragrostis cur-
vula Short/Low Closed Grass-
land. Species recorded: Cym-
bopogon excavatus, Desmo-
dium incanum, Eragrostis
curvula, Hyparrhenia hirta,
Rhynchelytrum repens, Sca-
biosa columbaria, Setaria
sphacelata, Sporobolus afri-
canus and Xysmalobium un-
dulatum. Location: Newlands.
Floristics
This community is distinguished by the Helichrysum
aureum species group (Appendix .41). The species diver-
sity per unit area is 0.16 species per m_ for the community,
with an average of 17.9 species per releve.
Trees and shrubs
Percentage occurrence and average cover of Chro-
molaena odorata* and Lantana camara* are:
Lantana camera* (shrub) 0.0% 0.0%
Chromolaena odorata* (shrub) 0.0% 0.0%
There are no conspicuous woody species with more
than 5% mean cover and occurring in more than 20% of
the releves representing the community.
Herbs
Herb species occurring in more than 20% of the releves
representing the community are:
General
This community is related to the other grassland Com-
munities 13, 14, 15 & 16 through the common presence
of the Helichrysum cephaloideum species group (Appen-
dix .42). This is the same floristic association shown by
Community 16, and supports the suggestion that these
communities represent the burned and unbumed version
of the same or very similar communities. Chromolaena
odorata* and Lantana camara* are also totally lacking
from this grassland community (Figures 5 & 6), a reflec-
tion of the comparatively undisturbed nature of this com-
munity and the effect of active management (burning and
clearing of alien invasives) in areas such as Silverglen
Nature Reserve and Stainbank Nature Reserve where this
community occurs.
The presence of Themeda triandra (Decreaser) within
the differential species of this community indicates that it
still bears some association with the primary grassland
types i.e. the fire maintained Themeda triandra grassland
proposed by Moll (1976). The species composition of
Community 17 is virtually identical to that described as
the ‘Secondary Aristida junciformis understorey’ of Moll's
(1976) Acacia sieberiana Wooded Grassland.
The widespread presence of Aristida junciformis (In-
creaser 111) in the sward is cause for concern and should
be addressed as part of any management plan for this com-
munity. The presence of Themeda triandra (Decreaser),
however, indicates the potential of the area to be returned
to a high quality grassland. This is supported by the pres-
ence of another Decreaser species Monocymbium cere-
siiforme. The idea that these grasslands may have been
moribund for extended periods of time as indicated by the
species composition of Community 16 is here also sug-
gested by the presence of species such as Helichrysum
aureum , which is diagnostic for this community. Heli-
chrysum aureum is a fire-sensitive species which is a com-
mon weed in unbumed or moribund fire -climax grasslands
302
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
(Tainton 1981c). The presence of Increaser I species such
as Cymbopogon validus tends to confirm this.
As with Community 16, the relatively minor occur-
rence of species characteristic of the broad generalist
Chaetacanthus burchellii species group (Appendix .45),
indicates a less disturbed form of grassland than repre-
sented by Communities 14 & 15. The occurrence of
Aristida junciformis in the sward, however, prescribes the
need for management policies aimed at reducing the
Aristida component and improving the Themeda.
In Community 17 there is a substantial decrease in spe-
cies diversity to levels just higher than those recorded for
the most heavily impacted grasslands (Communities 13 &
15) (Figure 4). The decrease in species diversity from the
levels attained by Community 16, indicates that as the
grass sward of this community type becomes moribund,
so the forb diversity decreases. Thus, fire will obviously
be an important management tool in maintaining the di-
versity of the herb populations in these grassland commu-
nities. The D structure of this community (Figure 2Q) is
due to the predominance of grass and forb species.
Community 18: Dianthus zeyheri-Eragrostis curvula
Short/Low Closed Grassland (Figure 24)
This short/low closed grassland community (Edwards
1983) is found at altitudes of 5-152 m. It is represented
by 13 releves (Appendix) with 2 — 43 species per releve.
This community (Edwards 1983) has a D structure (Ito
1979; Figure 2R) with the greatest average cover of 56.5%
in the 0.5-5. 0 m height class. No vegetation above 5 m
occurs in this community type.
Habitat
The soils are mainly of the Mispah Form, Mispah Se-
ries (7 out of 13 releves). Others underlying this commu-
nity type include the Cartref Form, Cartref Series; Dundee
Form, Dundee Series; Glenrosa Form, Williamson Series
and Milkwood Form, Milkwood Series. The terrain occu-
pied by this community varies from Hat at some sites to
an inclination of 39.8° at others, in a general easterly di-
rection (8 releves). Southeastern, southern and northern
aspects are also noted.
FI oris tics
This community is distinguished by the Dianthus
zeyheri species group (Appendix .43). The species diver-
sity per unit area averages 0.17 species per m" for the 13
releves, with and average of 19.0 species per releve.
Trees and shrubs
Percentage occurrence and average cover of Chro-
molaena odorata* and Lantana camara * are:
Lantana camara* (shrub) 15.4% 7.1%
Chromolaena odorata* (shrub) 0.0% 0.0%
There' are no conspicuous woody species with more
than 5% mean cover and occurring in more than 20% of
the releves representing the community.
Herbs
Herb species occurring in more than 20% of the releves
representing the community are:
Diagnostic
General
This community is related to grassland Communities
14, 15, 16 & 17 through the common presence of the
Hypoxis acuminata species group (Appendix .44). It is,
however, distinct from these communities in that it shows
no lloristic association with Community 13, except at the
grossest floristic level through the Chaetacanthus bur-
chellii species group (Appendix .45). Communities 14—17
show distinct floristic links with the more disturbed Com-
munity 13 through groups such as the Helichrysum
cephaloideum species group (Appendix .42). This species
group does not include Community 18.
The predominant grass species in Community 18 are
Cymbopogon sp. (Increaser I), Eragrostis curvula (In-
creaser II), Hyparrhenia hirta (Increaser II) and Panicum
maximum (Decreaser). Eragrostis curvula is characteristic
of ‘disturbed areas' and ‘badly managed veld' (Tainton et
al. 1976). Similarly, the presence of Hyparrhenia hirta is
probably due to the fact that Newlands (where the most
extensive areas of this community occur) was previously
used for the cultivation of sugarcane. Hyparrhenia hirta
tends to ‘become dominant on old-land sites’ (Tainton et
al. 1976). This grassland has a well-developed forb com-
ponent, not found in badly impacted grasslands such as
Community 15.
Woody encroachment into the grassland communities
is clearly evident through the presence of Acacia nilotica,
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
303
Albizici adianthifolia sapling, Chromolaena odorata*
seedlings, Lantana camara* and Psidium guajava* sap-
ling in the Chaetacanthus burchellii species group (Ap-
pendix .45), all of which occur in Community 18. It is
probable that reduced fire frequency has played a role in
facilitating this encroachment (Moll 1976).
As mentioned previously, Community 18 grasslands
are largely restricted to the Newlands area of municipal
Durban. This is one of the most obvious areas where the
current classification is incompatible with Moll’s (1976)
assertion that the dominant grasslands in Durban are Sec-
ondary Aristido junciformis grasslands. Community 18
grasslands differ substantially on floristic grounds from
Moll’s (1976) secondary grasslands. The most noticeable
difference is the absence of Aristida junciformis , which
Moll (1976) regards as the ‘dominant understorey grass’,
and the occurrence of Panicum maximum as a significant
component of the sward.
Although the two invasive shrub species Chromolaena
odorata * and Lantana camara* are present in Communi-
ties 13, 14 & 15, their significance decreases in Commu-
nities 16-18. This suggests that one is possibly dealing
with a mosaic of disturbance and recovery patterns within
the grassland community spectrum. Although clearly re-
lated to Communities 14-17 it is possible that Community
18 represents a transition to another grassland type not
sampled during this survey, and which forms part of the
community continuum that extends outside the municipal
boundaries. Further research is needed to clarify the rela-
tionship of Community 1 8 to the other grassland commu-
nities in the urban area.
This grassland community has a higher species diver-
sity than the Community 17 grasslands (Figure 4) and
shows signs of prior disturbance through the presence of
Lantana camara *, although Chromolaena odorata* is ab-
sent (Figure 5). Lantana camara* has a greater percentage
occurrence throughout all the grassland communities than
Chromolaena odorata* (Figure 6), suggesting that it may
be a preliminary invader of these communities (Ward
1980). The control of this species should therefore be
treated as a priority before it becomes a serious problem
in the remaining grassland areas. Community 1 8, as with
the remainder of the grassland communities, has a D struc-
ture (Figure 2R) due to the predominance of grass and
forb species.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
The classification of vegetation in the municipal
Durban area demonstrated the existence of 1 8 identifiable
floristic communities, eight of which had not been pre-
viously described. Research into the long-term dynamics
of all 18 communities will form part of Durban's ongoing
open space planning and management initiative.
In comparison to previous vegetation surveys which
have included the Durban municipal area or the majority
thereof, i.e. Acocks (1988), Cawood (1980) and Moll
(1976), this study presents a marked refinement in com-
munity description and identification. This has obvious ad-
vantages from a urban planning point of view, if the aim
is the establishment of an ecologically viable open space
system. According to Acocks’s ( 1988) community descrip-
tions, four main vegetation types could be identified
within the municipal area: Typical Coast-belt Forest, Dune
Forest, Mangrove Forest and Northern Variation of the
Valley Bushveld. However, the associated mapping con-
tribution by Acocks’s (1988), at a scale of 1:1 500 000,
prevented representation of this detail, and the whole city
is merely located within a belt of Coastal Forest and
Thomveld.
Moll (1976) in his The Three Rivers region: a vegeta-
tion study also identified four community types within the
municipal area: Coast Forest and Palm Veld, Dry Valley
Scrub and Woodland Mosaic, Acacia sieberiana Savanna
and Mangrove Swamp, with an associated mapping con-
tribution of 1:250 000. Although Moll (1976) shows a
more detailed rationalisation of the community distribu-
tion, there are some discrepancies between the commu-
nities represented on the 1:250 000 map and the commu-
nities which actually existed on the ground. By tracing
the municipal boundary on to Moll’s (1976) vegetation
map it is possible to ascertain that according to the map,
Phoenix is occupied by Coast Forest and Palm Veld. This
may well represent the natural potential for the area, but
at present the area is occupied by grasslands (e.g. Com-
munity 14) which have developed following the clearing
of extensive canelands which existed even when Moll
mapped Phoenix. This draws attention to the critical fact
that both Acocks and Moll tended to map the natural com-
munities which would have occurred at particular sites, or
their nearest equivalents, rather than ground truthing these
areas.
Of the three studies, Cawood (1980) presents the most
detailed analysis of community types within the municipal
area. He identified seven distinct groupings: Coast For-
est/Scrub and Woodland Mosaic, Dune Forest, Mangrove
Swamp, Bush Clump and Grassland Mosaic, Timber Plan-
tation. Heavily Disturbed and Intergradation of Coast For-
est/Scrub and Woodland Mosaic and Bush Clump and
Grassland Mosaic. The mapping contribution of this study
was presented at a scale of 1:50 000, and of the three
represents the most detailed and accurate description of
plant community distribution and location in the Durban
area. But not all of municipal Durban is included within
Cawood’s Greater Durban boundaries, as the section north
of the Umgeni River is omitted. Its usefulness to planners
in municipal Durban is further reduced by the fact that
many of the smaller open areas were not mapped or sur-
veyed.
Moll (1976) recognised the limitations of these three
studies when he wrote, ‘plant studies can play an import-
ant role in planning for future development. However, at
the scale at which the present survey was conducted, only
broad guidelines can be given for the region; the planning
of specific local areas requires more detailed plant eco-
logical studies.' The aim of the present study was therefore
to address this shortfall and to present a more detailed
community analysis and associated mapping contribution
(1:6 000) for municipal Durban; one that is sufficiently
accurate in terms of floristic detail and actual community
distribution to provide an effective planning and manage-
ment tool. It also highlighted the need for a more encom-
passing and holistic view of urban conservation. Extensive
floristic links in the Durban area indicate the need for a
304
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
landscape- (rather than a species- or even community-)
based approach to open space design (Forman & Godron
1986). This in turn implies that the ecological viability of
any open space system proposed for the City can only be
ensured through the mitigation of landscape fragmenta-
tion, e.g. through the provision of dispersal corridors and
the implementation of management techniques favouring
naturalisation and the recreation of natural habitat settings.
These guidelines have been employed in the design of the
municipal Durban open space system described by Rob-
erts (1990).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Prof. J.C. Poynton provided overall supervision of the
project. Dr R.H. Westfall advised on data collection and
analysis. Mr C. Allan assisted with field work. Mr M.
Panagos and Mrs B.C. de Wet were especially helpful
with computer operations. Mrs. M. Jordaan, Mr A.
Ngwenya and Mr A. Nicholas of the Natal Herbarium and
Mr G. Nichols of Durban’s Parks Department, identified
most of the plant specimens. Mr P. Newman took the pho-
tographs. Financial assistance from the CSIR and the Sun-
day Tribune Tellypot is also acknowledged.
REFERENCES
ACOCKS, J.RH. 1988. Veld types of South Africa, 3rd edn. Memoirs of
the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 57.
ALEXANDER. G.J. 1987. The herpetofauna of municipal Durban: a
biogeographica I review. M.Sc. thesis. University of Natal,
Durban.
BAYER, A.W. 1955. The ecology of grasslands. In D. Meredith, The
grasses and pastures of South Africa. Johannesburg.
CAWOOD, B.G. 1980. Open space areas of greater Durban. A prelimi-
nary survey. Natal Town and Regional Planning Report Vol. 45.
Natal Town and Regional Planning Commission, Pietermaritz-
burg.
COATES PALGRAVE, K. 1983. Trees of southern Africa. Struik, Cape
Town.
DIRECTOR PARKS, BEACHES AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1989. D’MOSS: Durban metropolitan open space system. Parks,
Beaches and Recreation Department, Durban.
DYER, R.A. 1976. The genera of southern African flowering plants.
Department of Agricultural Technical Services, Pretoria.
EDWARDS, D. 1983. Abroad-scale structural classification of vegetation
for practical purposes. Botluilia 14: 705-712.
FORMAN, R.T.T. & GODRON, M. 1986. Landscape ecology. Wiley,
New York.
HILL, M.O. 1979. DECORANA — a FORTRAN program for detrended
correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. Cornell Uni-
versity, Ithaca, New York.
HILL, M.O. & GAUCH, H.G. 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis:
an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42: 47-58.
ITO, K. 1979. A tentative study of stratification diagrams. In A. Miyawaki
& S. Okuda, Vegetation und Landschaft Japans. Yokohama Phy-
tosociological Society, Yokohama.
HUTCHINGS, P. & SAENGER, P. 1987. Ecology of mangroves. Univer-
sity of Queensland Press, St Lucia.
KING, L.C. 1982. The Natal monocline: explaining the origin and sce-
nery of Natal. South Africa. University of Natal; The Natal Wit-
ness, Pietermaritzburg.
KING, L.C. & MAUD, R.R. 1964. The geology of Durban and environs.
Bulletin of Geological Survey of South Africa No. 42.
LIGGITT, B. 1983. The invasive plant Chromolaena odorata with regard
to its status and control in Natal. Monograph 2. Institute of
Natural Resources, Pietermaritzburg.
MACDONALD, I.A.W. & JARMAN, M.L. (eds) 1985. Invasive alien
plants in the terrestrial ecosystems of Natal South Africa. South
African National Scientific Programmes Report No. 1 1 8. CSIR,
Pretoria.
MACVICAR, C.N., DE VILLIERS, J.M.. LOXTON, R.F., VERSTER,
E„ LAMBRECHTS, J.J.N., MERRYWEATHER, F.R., LE
ROUX, J„ VAN ROOYEN, T.H. & HARMSE, H.J. VON M.
1977. Soil classification: a binomial system for South Africa.
Department of Agricultural Technical Services, Pretoria.
MOLL, E.J. 1976. The vegetation of the Three Rivers region. Natal. Natal
Town and Regional Planning Report Vol. 33. Natal Town and
Regional Planning Commission, Pietermaritzburg.
MUELLER-DOMBOIS, D. & ELLENBERG, H. 1974. Aims and meth-
ods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, New York.
PRESTON-WHYTE, R.A. 1980. Climate of Durban. Natal Town and
Regional Planning Report Vol. 44. Natal Town and Regional
Planning Commission, Pietermaritzburg.
ROBERTS, D.C. 1 990. An open space survey of municipal Durban. Ph.D.
thesis. University of Natal, Durban.
RUTHERFORD, M.C. & WESTFALL, R.H. 1986. Biomes of southern
Africa — an objective categorization. Memoirs of the Botanical
Survey of South Africa No. 54.
SCHEEPERS, J.C., BOUCHER, C. & WESTFALL, R.H. no date. The
standardisation of syntaxonomic nomenclature . South African
Syntaxonomic Nomenclature Committee, Botanical Research In-
stitute, Pretoria. Unpublished.
SCHULZE, B.R. 1 947. Climate of South Africa according to Koppen and
Thornth waite classification. South African Geographical Journal
29: 32-42.
SUKOPP, H. & WERNER, P. 1983. Urban environments and education.
In W. Holzner, M.J.A. Werger & I. Ikusima, Man's impact on
vegetation. Junk, The Hague.
TAINTON, N.M., BRANSBY, D.I. & BOOYSEN, P. DE V. 1976. Com-
mon veld and pasture grasses of Natal. Shuter & Shooter,
Pietermaritzburg.
TAINTON, N.M. 1981a. The ecology of the main grazing lands of South
Africa. In N.M. Tainton, Veld and pasture management in South
Africa. Shuter & Shooter in association with University of Natal
Press, Pietermaritzburg.
TAINTON, N.M. 1981b. Introduction to the concepts of development,
production and stability of plant communities. In N.M. Tainton,
Veld and pasture management in South Africa. Shuter & Shooter
in association with University of Natal Press, Pietermaritzburg.
TAINTON, N.M. 1981c. Veld burning. In N.M. Tainton, Veld and pasture
management in South Africa. Shuter & Shooter in association
with University of Natal Press, Pietermaritzburg.
TAINTON, N.M. & MENTIS, M.T. 1984. Fire in grassland. In P. de V.
Booysen & N.M. Tainton, Ecological effects of fire in South
African ecosystems. Springer- Verlag, Heidelberg.
TINLEY, K.L. 1985. Coastal dunes of South Africa. South African Na-
tional Scientific Programmes Report No. 109. CSIR, Pretoria.
WARD, C.J. 1980. The plant ecology of the Isipingo Beach area, Natal,
South Africa. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa
No. 45.
WERGER, M.J.A. 1974. On concepts and techniques applied in the
Zurich-Montpellier method of vegetation survey. Bothalia 1 1 :
309-323.
WESTFALL. R.H., DEDNAM, G„ VAN ROOYEN, N. & THERON,
G.K. 1982. PHYTOTAB — a program package for Braun-
Blanquet tables. Vegetatio 49: 35-37.
WESTFALL, R.H. & DE WET, B.C. 1988. New programs for prelimi-
nary sequencing of releves and species in phytosociological data
sets. Bothalia 18: 122, 123.
WESTFALL, R.H., VAN ROOYEN, N. & THERON, G.K. 1983. Veld
condition assessments in Sour Bushveld. Proceedings of the
Grassland Society of southern Africa 18: 73-76.
WESTHOFF, V. & VAN DER MAAREL, E. 1973. The Braun-Blanquet
approach. In R.H. Whittaker, Handbook of vegetation science.
Junk, The Hague.
WHITE, F. 1983. The vegetation of Africa: a descriptive memoir to
accompany the UNESCO/AETFAT/UNSO vegetation map of
Africa. UNESCO, Paris.
APPENDIX
Synoptic table showing the general species characteristics of each of the 52 communities distinguished in the study area. Complete phytosociological
tables for both the diagnostic species and the non-diagnostic species are available from the author or Dr R.H. Westfall, Agricultural Research Council,
Roodeplaat Grassland Institute, Private Bag X05, Lynn East 0039, Pretoria.
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
305
APPENDIX — Phytosociological classification of the vegetation of municipal Durban (synoptic table)
C o m m u “I :i t y n u m i :< e r
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 3 0 t 2 3 4 5 & 7 8 }
1 . 4 v i c e n n i a w a r i n a-Br u g u i e r a g y n n o r r h i >: a m a n grove s h o r t f o r e s t
.4v icennia war in a CD 5
Bruguiera gynnorrhiza CD 5
Rhizophora micro mat a (T) 3
7-iv icennia. war ins seedlings; CD 2
Brt.tgu.iers gynnorrhiza seedlings CD 2
Rhizophora. tuner on at a seedlings (T) 2
2., Minus ops csf fra- Alio phylus n at a lens is low/short thicket
N i « u s o p s c a f f r a ( T )
4 1 1 o p h y 1 u s n a t a 1 e n s i s ( T )
C y n a n c h m o b t u s i f oli u. w ( C L )
Mi mu sops caff r a sapling CD
C o r o' i a c a f f r a s a p 1 i n g ( T )
Croton sylvsticus (T)
.0 <? i n b o 1 i i a o b 1 <> n g i f o 2 i a s e e d 1 i n g s CD
Dry petes natalensis CD
ficus lute a CD
Car is sa' bispinosa sapling (S)
C o r d i a c a f f r a s e e cl 1 i n g ( T >
C y p h o s t e « w a f 1 a v i f lor um ( F / C )
Paveita revoluta. sapling (S)
7 r i c a .i y s i a s o n d e r i a n a ( S / T )
B e q u a e r t i o d e n d r o n n a t a 1 e n s a ( T )
R a hi s o n i. a 1 u c i o a s a p 1 i n g ( T )
T e c 1 e a n a t a len s i s s a p 1 i n g ( T )
+
+
+
•i-
3., Differential species for communities 2 'A 3
Eugenia cape ns is (S) 3 +
Abut i Ion sonnerat ianutn (F) + 1
Barleria obi us a (SL) r :L
+
4 .. Mani ikara discolor-Tricalysia lanceo lata short thicket
iT! anil k a r a disc o 1 o r s a p 1 i n g CD 4
M a n 1 1 k a r a d i s c o lor ( T ) 4
!
I
i
I
i
i
5„ Differential species for communities 3 & 4
7 n <: a 1 y s i. a 1 a n c: eo lata (S' / T ) 2 3 + +
Dry petes arguta sapling (I) + 3 +
Vernonia angulifolia (F) ;l. +
Alien and naturalised species
*'•* (C) - Sedge? (F) •- Forb; (Cl) - Cliniber;i (G) ~ Grass;
(R) - Reed; (GEO) - Geophyte; (P) - Fern; (X) - Xerophyte
(S) - Shrub; (SU) - Undershrub; (SL) - Shrublet; CD - Tree;
(/c) - Climbing form
306
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
APPENDIX — Phytosociological classification of the vegetation of municipal Durban (synoptic table) (continued)
* Alien and naturalised species
** (C) - Sedge;: (F) ~ Forb; (Cl) - Climber;: (G) ~ Grass;
(R) - Reed; (GEO) -- Geophyte; (P) - Fern; (X) - Xerophyte
(S) - Shrub; (SU) - Undershrub; (SL) - Shrublet; (T) - Tree;
(/c) - Climbing form
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
307
APPENDIX — Phytosociological classification of the vegetation of municipal Durban (synoptic table) (continued)
10. Rhus pent he r i-C us soma s p i <: a t a low thicket
R h u 5 p e n t h <9 r i ( T )
Cussonia spicata (T)
Do wheys til i sees CD
.4 c a c i a r o b u s i a CD
P rot as pa r a g u s d e n s i f 1 o r u s ( C L )
Abut i ion s p CF)
A c s 1 y p ha g 1 a b r at a s a p 1 i n g ( T )
A c a 1 y p h a s o n d e r i a .*•> a s a p 1 i n g ( T )
C a p p a r i s f a s c i c: u i a r i s (CL >
Cocfb ret u w k r a u s s i i ( T >
Co wo ip nor a harveyi (T)
Euphorbia triangularis sapling CD
F i c u s n a t a 1 e n s is (I )
ii sew ant bus alb if i os (F)
M a y t e n u s n o s s a « b i c e n s i s ( T )
W a y ten u s u n d a t a s a p 1 i n g CD
P u 1 1 e r 1 i c k i a v e r r u <: o s a s a p 1 i n g ( S / 1 )
R h u s r eh ft a n n i a n a ( D
S a n s e v i e r i a s p . C X )
A c r i d o c a r p u s n at a 1 i t i u s ( £ )
Ehretia rig id a (S)
Euphorbia triangularis CD
0 s y r i d i c a rpos s c h i w p e r i a n u s ( S U )
Rhus gueinzii sapling (S)
R h u s s p „ sap 1 i n g ( T )
T e cowan a c a p a n s i s s a p 1 i n g ( S )
11 „ Differential species for communities 5 & b
12. Differential species for communities 4. 5 R 6
Cant hi Ud i nerve sapling (T) +
C u s 5 o n i a s pica t a s a p 1 i n g ( I )
+ 1 1
4 2
Alien and naturalised species
++ (C) - Sedge? (F) ~ Forb; (Cl) - Climber; (G) - Grass;
(R) - Reed? (GEO) - Geophyte? (P) - Fern; (X) - Xerophyte
(5) - Shrub? (SU) Undershrub; (SL) - Shrublet? CD - Tree?
(/c) - Climbing form
308
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
APPENDIX — Phytosociological classification of the vegetation of municipal Durban (synoptic table) (continued)
111111111
Community number 12 3 456789012345678
Alien and naturalised species
** (C) - Sedge? (F) - Forb; (Cl) - Climber;: (G) - Grass;
(R) - Reed; (GEO) -- Geophyte; (P) - Fern; (X) - Xerophyte
(S) - Shrub; (SU) - Undershrub; (SL) - Shrublet; (T) - Tree;
(/c) - Climbing form
Bothalia 23,2 ( 1993)
309
APPENDIX — Phytosociological classification of the vegetation of municipal Durban (synoptic table) (continued)
+ Alien and naturalised species
** (C) - Sedge? (F) - Forb? (Cl) - Climber? (G) - Grass?
(R) - Reed? (GEO) -- Geophyte? (P) - Fern? (X) - Xerophyte
(S) - Shrub? (SU) - Undershrub? (SL) - Shrublet? (I) - free?
(/c) - Climbing form
310
BothaUa 23,2 (1993)
APPENDIX Phytosociological classification of the vegetation of municipal Durban (synoptic table) (continued)
Community number
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 1 1 1 1 1 1.
7 8 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 1
7 8
2 1 .. D i f f e r e n t :i. a 1 s p e c :i. i
tor c omnium tie
3 & 3
/■' r o t a s p a r a p it s v .v. r 9 a i it s ( C L )
J a s iv i ft it i« fii « 1 1 i p a r i i t « « ( S / C )
ii i b i s c u s c a i' y p h y 1 1 it s ( B )
Apodytes diaid data sapling CD
Y c a d 0 x u s p u n i c e a s ( F >
B r i d & 1 i a « i c r a it t h a ( T )
.0 a i b o r iv i a 0 b 0 v a t a s e e d 1 i n g s ( T / C )
T r a 1 s a 0 r i e it t ali s < I )
a i p it r .1 a a r «? a s a p I i n g ( 8 )
W a £ e it it s h e i & r 0 p h y 1 1 a ( I )
Y a p i u a ;t o t e g a r r i « w ( T )
.4 p <5 Y i-' f; e s Y i « i d i a i a s e e d 1 i n g s ( T )
B a i e c b a w p i a c a p e it s i s < S U / C )
P a v e £ £ a i a n c e <? i a £ a s a p 1 i n g ( T / 8 )
T r a « a r i a n £ a i s s a p 1 i n g ( T )
Monts no a hibiscifoiia (S) *
22. Differential species for communities 3, d, 5, b:, 7:. 3 & 9
J s o g 1 o s s a w o o d i i ( F / S U )
M o it a it i h o t a ,v i s c a f f r a ( S / C )
D a 1 b e r a i a a r i“ a Y a ( T / C )
i: ltd a da s pic at a (S/C)
.4 e i 1 & a a e -7 u i » o c f; i a >. s ( F )
B a p /j i a r a c e « o s a s a p 1 i n g ( T )
<3 r e w i a o c c i d e n t a .1 i s ( S 5
T r a p i a Y u r b a n e n s i s ( F )
.4 c a c i a Y r a u s s i a it a ( S / C >
.0 i o s c p r a a c e t i n i f o i a ( C L. )
2 3 D i f f e r e n t i a 1 s p e c i e s f o r c. o m m u n :i. t :i. e s 3 r
Nang if era indie a (T) *
Biospyros ly do ides sapling (S)
S y z y g i u w c u w in :i. i i T )
P a v o ft i a b u r c h e i i i i ( F )
.0 a 1 b e r « i a o b o v a i a ( I / C )
£; r y t h r i n a 1 y s i s i e w o it ( I )
1 + + 1 1
+ + i + 1
i + +
1 1
:!. 2 4 2 2 !. 2 :!. 1
1 + + 1 1
X X
■f +
+
■1- +
+ +
2 4 » B <? t /? r i o c h 1 o a i it s c u .? p f; a - // y p a r r b e n i a h i r t a s h o r t c ]. o s e d g r a s s 1 a n d
hot hr iochioa in sculpt a (G'i) ■ 4
e « c a e « a I e u c o c e p h a 1 a ( B )
2 5 „ F /•? r a g m i t e s au s t r a i i s - C y p e r it s i w m e it s u s s H o r t c 1 o s e d g r a s si a n d / / 1 a 11 / hi g h c 1 o s e d
s h r u b land / / 1 a 1 1 c 1 o s e d r e e d h e d m o s a i c
P h r a g (n i t e s a u s f; r a i i s ( R )
P h rag m i t e s s p ( I? )
Rim ex rhodesins (F)
4 war a nth its spin os its (F) *
P o .1 y g o it it h y d r o p i p e r ( Fr / S )
P o 1 y g o n u i»j s e n e p a Z e it s e ( F / S )
:t: Alien and naturalised species
+:f: (C) - Sedge;: (F) - Forb; (Cl) - Climber;: (G) - Grass?
(R) ~ Reed;: (GEO) -- Geophyte? (P) - Fern? (X) - Xerophyte
(S) - Shrub? (SU) - Undershrub; (SI.) - Shrublet; (T) - Tree?
(/c) - Climbing form
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
311
APPENDIX — Phytosociological classification of the vegetation of municipal Durban (synoptic table) (continued)
Hypochoeris glabra (F)
Paspahtft no tat nit (G) *
Chaftaasyce hyper icifo lia (F) *
C i s s s ft p a 1 o s w u c r o n a t a ( S / C )
C o r c h o r u s t r i 1 o <: u 1 a r i s ( F )
!: r a g r o s t i s c i 1 i a r i s ( G >
Hibiscus sp, (F)
Hibiscus trio nu ft (F)
J a c ■:.< a ft o n t i a t a m n i f o 1 i a ( F / C )
L a a e j? a r i a w a <rc a r e ns (F / C )
/.. v- c e ,£■ e r s i c f? s p .. ( F >
fV e w e s i a c a e r u 1 a a ( F )
p a s pal u iv s c r o b i c tt 1 a i u « ( G )
S t e n o i a p h r u m s e c u n d a t u ft ( G )
T rid ax pro cue-bens (F) *
A c a 1 y p h a e c k 1 o n i i. ( F )
Amaranth us dub ins (F) *
C h r y s a n t h e w o i d e s w o n i i i f e r a s e e d 1 i n g s ( S )
C o r e o p s i s 1 a n c e o 1 a t a ( F )
£ ) p e r u s n a i a i e » s i s ( C )
M a I i 1 o t u s i n d i c a ( F ) *
p e 1 a r g o n i u ft a 1 c h e m i 1 1 o i d e s ( F )
R u b u s p i n n a t u s ( S / C >
27 n Differential specie a for communities 12 si 13
Mar bens bon aria ns is (F) *
L a p i d i u « b o n a r i e n s a (F) *
La port as peduncular is (F)
Achy rant has as par a <F> *
28. Differential species for communities li;. 12 & 13
Mariscus sueiatrens is (C)
H ;i b i s c u s can n a b i n us ( S )
S as ban is sesban (S)
C y p e r u s i m ft e n s u s ( C )
Indigo far a s pic at a (F>
S p o r o b o i u s p y r a « i d al is ( G )
Indigof era trita (F)
Perm is at lift purpureuft (ID +
Senna didymobotrys (S) :}:
Alien and naturalised species
** (C) - Sedge') (F) - Forb; (Cl) - Climber:: (G)
(R> - Reed; (GEO) - Geophyte; (P) - Fern; (X)
(S) - Shrub; (SU) - Undershrub; (SI.)
(/c) - Climbing form
+ 1
1
+
~ Grass;
Xero phyte
Shrublet; (T) - Tree;
312
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
APPENDIX — Phytosociological classification of the vegetation of municipal Durban (synoptic table) (continued)
+ Alien and naturalised species
(C) - Sedge;: (F) - Forb; (Cl) - Climber;: (G) - Grass;:
(R) - Reed;: (GEO) -• Geophyte; (P) - Fern; (X) - Xerophy te
(S) - Shrub; (SU) - Undershrub; (SI.) - Shrublet; (T) - Tree;
(/c) - Climbing form
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
313
APPENDIX — Phytosociological classification of the vegetation of municipal Durban (synoptic table) (continued)
* Alien and naturalised species
++ (C) - Sedge; (F) - Forb; (Cl) - Climber; (G) - Grass;
(R) - Reed; (GEO) - Geophyte; (P) - Fern; (X) - Xerophyte
(S) - Shrub; (SU) - Undershrub; (SI.) - Shrublet; (T) - Tree;
(/c) - Climbing form
314
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
APPENDIX — Phytosociological classification of the vegetation of municipal Durban (synoptic table) (continued)
Community number
111111111
12 3 456789012345678
3 6 „ S u i e r a k r a u s s i a « a - A r i s t i d a j u n c i f o r « i s 1 o w / s h o r t c 1 o s e d g r a s s 1 a n d
0 x a .; i s i' a t i f o 1 :i a ( F > : J:
,? u. t e r a k r a u s s i a » a ( F )
I nd igofera s p „ (F)
37. Differential species for communities 14 'A 15
40. Hypo;; is gerrardi i- Allot er ops is semialata low closed grassland
Alep idea sp« (F)
Hypo;; is gerrard ii (GEO) +
A i l o t ۥ r o p s i s s e m i a 1 a t a ( G )
Beciun obovatum (F)
Euphorbia nat alerts is (F)
Jr istachya leucothr i>: (G)
Aster baker anus (F> +
B e r k h e y a spec i osa < F )
41. HelichrysuM aureun-Theneda triandra short closed grassland
H e 1 i chrys u w a u r e u « ( F )
W o n o c: y « b i u w c. e r e s i if or i« e
Tephrosia kraussiana (F)
(G)
13;
Alien and naturalised species
(C) - Sedge; (F) - Forb; (Cl) - Climber; (G) - Grass ;
(R) - Reed; (GFO) -- Geophyte; (P) - Fern; (X) - Xerophyte
(S) - Shrub; (SU) - Undershrub; (SL) - Shrublet; CD - Tree:
(/c) - Climbing form
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
315
APPENDIX — Phytosociological classification of the vegetation of municipal Durban (synoptic table) (continued)
# fill en and natu r a 1 i sed s pec i es
++ (O - Sedges (F) - Forb; (Cl) - Climber:: (G) - Grass;
(R) - Reed; (GEO) -- Geophyte; (P) - Fern; (X) - Xerophyte
(S) - Shrub; (SU) - Undershrub: (SL) - Shrublet; (T) - Tree;
(/c) - Climbing form
316
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
APPENDIX — Phytosociological classification of the vegetation of municipal Durban (synoptic table) (continued)
111111111
Community number 12 3 456789012345678
45. Differential species for communities 2:. 3, 4. 5:. 6, 7, 8 , 9, 10, 11., 12, 13,
14, 15, 16, 17 ft 18 (continued)
H e 1 i c. h r y s tt m d e <: o r a w < F )
/)' e i i c h r y s tt w n tt d i f a 1 i a w ( F )
1 po a oea c sirica (F/C)
S e n ecio v a r i ah i 1 i s ( F )
Rid si t.ts cowwuttis (S) :{:
Sen ecio s p „ (F)
H y p a r r h e n i a s p „ ( 0 )
.0 e s « o d i ft' g a n g e t i c n ft' ( F >
L a tt t a )■; a r g o s a ( F / 8 )
S e tt e c i o c h r y s oco ft) a ( F )
Des» o d i it ft i n c a n it ft) ( F )
C e n t e 1 1 a a s i a t i c a ( F )
7 e r a ft) tt <.< s i ah i a J i s ( F )
H y p a r r h e n i a h i r t a ( Q )
X y 5 ft) a i o h i u ft) (.( n d i.t i a t u ft) ( F )
P s :t d i. u ft) « tt a j a v a s a p). ing ( T ) *
E r a g r o s t i s c tt r v tt 1 a ( l7i )
P a tt i c tt ft) ft) a ,v i ft) u ft) ( Q )
La nt an a cawara (S) *
46. Trees
A h r tt s p r e c a t o r i tt s
Daibergia a mat a seed liny (C) **
S chin tt<s terebinthifo Hits sapling
1/ a tt g tt e r i a i n f a tt s t a s a p I i n g
A .1 b i z i a a d i a n t h i f o i i a s e e d 1 i n g s
A i i o p h y i tt s ft) elan o c a r p tt s
A tt t i d e s ft) a v e n o s tt ft)
0 a 1 h e r g i a a r ft) a t a s a p 1 i n g ( C )
G r e u' i a o c c i d e nt a 1 i s s a p 1 i n g
M a y t a n tt s n e ft) or o s a
S c h i n tt $ t e r e b i. n t si i f o 1 i u s *
7 e p h r o s i a p o i y s t a c b y a s e e d 1 i n g s
C h r y s a n t h e « o i d e s ft) o n i 1 i f e r a s a p 1 i n g
H e t e r o p y >: i s n a t a i e n s i s
H i ppo b r o ft) it s p a u c i f 1 o r tt s s e e d I i n g s
L e u. c a e n a 1 e u c o c e p h a 1 a s a p 1 ing
M a y t e n tt s s e n e g a 1 e n s i s
Morns sp „ sapling :{:
S a p i tt ftj i tt t a g e rri ft) tt ft) s a p 1 i n g
S t r y c h n o s ft) a d a g a s c a r i a n s i s s a p 1 i n g
(■[ ac a a t a ,v a c a n t h a ( (... )
Acacia gerrardii sapling
A c a c i a sp. s e e d I i n g
A c a 1 y p h a g i a b r a t a s e e d 1 i n g s
A llophyl it s ft) e 1 a n o c arp tt s s a p 1 i n g
A 1 i o p h y .1 tt s « a t a 1 e n s i s s a p 1 i n g
A n a 5 1 r a b e i n t e g e r r i ft) a s a p 1 i n g
B a p h i a r a c e ft) o s a s e e d 1 :i. n g s
* A 1 i e n a n d n a t u r a Used s p e c i e s
++ (C) -■ Sedge? (F) - Forb; (Cl) - Climber;; (G) - Grass;:
(R) ■- Reed;: (GEO) -- Geophyte ? (F) - Fern? (X) - Xerophyte
(S) - Shrub? (SU) - Undershrub? (SI.) - Shrublet? (T) - free?
(/ c) - Climbing form
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
317
APPENDIX — Phytosociological classification of the vegetation of municipal Durban (synoptic table) (continued)
+• Alien and n a t u r alise d s p e c i e s
++ (G) ~ Sedge;: (F) - I- orb; (Cl) - Climber;: (G) - Crass;
(R) - Reed;: (GEO) -- Geophyte; (P) - Fern; (X) ~ Xerophyte
(S) - Shrub;: (SU) - Under shrub; (SI.) - Shrublet; (T) - Tree;
(/c) - Climbing form
318
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
APPENDIX — Phytosociological classification of the vegetation of municipal Durban (synoptic table) (continued)
+• A l i e n and n a t u r a 1 :i s e d s p e c :i .e s
++ (C) Sedge; (F) - Fort); (Cl) - Climber;: (G) - Grass;:
(R> ~ Reed;: (GEO) -- Geophyte; (P) - Fern; (X) - Xerophyte
(S) - Shrub; (SU) - Under shrub; (SI.) - Shrub let; (T) - Tree;
(/c) - Climbing form
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
319
APPENDIX Phytosociological classification of the vegetation of municipal Durban (synoptic table) (continued)
+ ft 1 i e n a n d n a t u r a 1 i s e d s p e c i e s
*+ (C) ~ Sedges (F) - Forb; (Cl) - Climber;; (6) - Grass;
(R) - Reed; (GEO) -- Geo ph vie; (P) - Fern; (X) - Xerophyte
(S) - Shrub; (SU) Under shrub; (SL) - Shrub let; (T) - Tree:;
( / c ) - Climbing form
320
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
APPENDIX — Phytosociological classification of the vegetation of municipal Durban (synoptic table) (continued)
:t: filien and n a t u r a 1 :L s e d s p e c i e s
++ (C) Sedge? (F) - Forb? (Cl) - Climber;: (G) Grass"
(R) - Reed;: (GEO) -■ ‘ Geophyte ? (P) - Fern? (X) - Xero phyte
(S) - Shrub;: (SU) - Undershrub? (SI.) ~ Shrub let? (T) - Tree;:
(/c) - Climbing form
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
321
APPENDIX Phytosociologicul classification of the vegetation of municipal Durban (synoptic table) (continued)
Alien and naturalised species
++ (C) - Sedge; (F) - Forb; (Cl) - Climber; (G) - Grass;
(R) - Reed; (GEO) - Geophyte; (P) - Fern; (X) - Xerophyte
(S) - Shrub; (SU) - Undershrub; (SI.) - Shrublet; (T) - Tree;
(/c) - Climbing form
322
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
APPENDIX Phytosociological classification of the vegetation of municipal Durban (synoptic tabie) (continued)
Community number 1 2 3 4567 8 9012345 6 78
148. Sedges
* Alien and naturalised species
++ (C) - Sedge? (F) - Forb? (Cl) -• Climber? (G) Grass;
(R) - Reed; (GEO) -- Gieophyte; (P) - Fern; (X) - Xerophyte
(S) - Shrub? (SU) - Undershrub; (SI.) ~ Shrublet; (T) - Tree;
(/c) ~ Climbing form
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
323
APPENDIX — Phytosociological classification of the vegetation of municipal Durban (synoptic table) (continued)
* Alien and naturalised species
** (C) - Sedge? (F) - Forb?' (Cl) - Climber; (G) - Grass;
(R) - Reed; (GEO) - Geophyte; (P) - Fern? (X) - Xerophyte
(S) - Shrub; <SU) - IJndershrub; (SI.) - Shrublet; (T) - Tree;
(/c) - Climbing form
324
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
APPENDIX Phytosociolog ical classification of the vegetation of municipal Durban (synoptic table) (continued)
* Alien and naturalised species
** (C) - Sedge; (F) - Forb; (Cl) - Climber; (G) - Grass;
(R) - Reed; (GEO) - Geophyte; (P) - Fern; (X) - Xerophyte
(S) - Shrub; (SU) - Undershrub; (SL) - Shrublet; (T) - Tree;
(/c) - Climbing form
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
325
APPENDIX — Phytosociological classification of the vegetation of municipal Durban (synoptic table) (continued)
111111111
Community number 12 3 456789 0 12345678
51. Forbs and geophytes (continued }
H a c roiy 1 o w <5 w a r a n g u e n s a
W el ant her a scan d e n s
Me i ham a d id yma
M e r r e w i a t r i d s n t a i a
M i r a h i 1 i s j a .1 a p a *
Micandra physaiodes
fV i d o r e 1 1 a a u r i c u. 1 a t a s e e d 1 i n g s
iV i d o r e 1 1 a s p e e e d ling s
Mot ho s cor daw i nod o rum +
0 e n o t h e r a p a r o d i a n a *
0 r i h o s i p h o n s u f f r u t e s c e n s
P e n t a r r h i n u w i n s i p i d u. m ( C )
P e p on am ro a c k e n i i ( C )
P e u c e d a n u m c a p e n s e
P h y 1 1 a n t h u s h e i s r a p h y 1 1 u s
P h y s a 1 i s a n g u 1 a t a ;f:
Physaiis vis cos a seedlings
P o 1 y g o n u. w a 1 i c i f o 1 i
R a p h i o n a c « e f I a n a g a n i i ( C )
R a p h i. o n a <: c> e g a 1 p i n i i ( C )
P. h y n c h o s i a n e. r v o s a
R ti b i a c o r d i f o 1 1 a
Rum ex crispus *
Rum ex sp» *
Sarcostemma viMi.na.le CC)
S c h i s t o 5 1 e p h i u m r o t u n d i. fol i. u m
S <: h i .7 o g 1 o s s u m cor d i f o 1 i u w
S c h k u h r i a- p i n n a t a :}:
Sebaea sedoides
S e n e c i o c h r y s o com a seed 1 i n g s
S e n e c i o co r o nat u s
S e n ecio d e 1 t o i d e u s
S e n ecio o x y o d o n t a s
S e n e cio s p . se e d 1 i n g s
S i d a c o r d i f o 1 i a
S i d a r h o m b i f oh a s e e d 1 i n g s
S o 1 a n a m i n c a n a s«
S o n c h u s d r eg e a n u s
X o n c h u s s p „ s e e d .1 i i "i g s
•S’ p e r m a c o c e n a t a 1 e n s i s
Stachytarpheta indie a
St rept o carp o. s p r o 1 i x u s
S t riga a s i a t i c a
Jal i. n u i'.i c a f f r u w
T e p h r o s i a c a p e n s i s
Tephr o s i. a 1 o n g i. pes
Jet rag o n i a tetr a g o a o i d e s
7 he s i u iw n at a 1 e n s e
JhesiuM sp.
7 h u n h e r gia ala t a
7 i t h o n i a d i v ers if o 1 i a s a p 1 :L n g :
7 it ho n i a d i v e r sifoli a seedling s :{:
+
+
+
•f
+
+
I
+ i
■f
•f
+
+ Alien and naturalised species
** (C) - Sedges (F) ~ Forb;' (Cl) - Climber;: (G) - Grass;:
(R) - Reeds (GEO) - Geophyte; (P) - Ferns (X) - Xerophyte
(S) - Shrubs (SU) ••• Undershrubs (SL) - Shrublets (I) - Tree;
(/c) - Climbing form
326
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
APPENDIX — Phytosociological classification of the vegetation of municipal Durban (synoptic table) (continued)
* A 1 i e n a n d n a t u r a 1 i s e d s p e c i e s
** (C) •••• Sedges (F) - Fort;? (CD - Climber;! (G) - Grass;;
(R) - Reed 3 (GEO) -- Geophyte? (P) - Ferns (X) - Xerophyte
(G> - Shrub? (SU) - Under shrub? (6L) - Shrub. let ? CD Tree?
(/c) ■- Climbing form
Bothalia 23,2: 327-337(1993)
NATIONAL BOTANICAL INSTITUTE
SOUTH AFRICA
Scientific, Technical and Administrative Staff
(3 1st March 1993)
CHIEF DIRECTORATE
CAPETOWN
Huntley, Prof. B.J. M.Sc. Chief Director
Stafford, Mrs D.L. Senior Secretary
ADMINISTRATION DIRECTORATE
CAPETOWN
Jordaan, A.W. Adv. Dip. B & A. Director: Personnel and Finance
Comelissen, Mrs A.M. Secretary to the Board
Hughes, W.S.G. Head: Finance
Smuts, Mrs W.E. Head:Administration (Pretoria)
Van Zyl, J.M. Head: Personnel
ADMINISTRATION— PRETORIA
Smuts, Mrs W.E. Head: Administration
Albertse, Miss L. B.A. Personnel Officer
Britz, Mrs E.P. Telephonist
Joubert, Mrs I.J.M. Senior Administration Clerk
Kama, Mrs PB. General Assistant
Kekana, Mrs M.R. General Assistant
Kgaditsi, W.T. Photocopy Machine Operator
Koehne, Mrs R.W.R. Senior Registration Clerk
Letebele, M.M. General Assistant
Makgobola, Mrs M.R. General Assistant
Maphuta, Mrs M.S. General Assistant
Nkosi, Mrs PM. General Assistant
Phaala, M.C. General Assistant
Phiri, Mrs E. General Assistant
Thiart, Mrs S.P Dip. (Typing). Principal Typist
Tloubatla, J.M. Courier/Photocopy Machine Operator
Venter, W.A. N2 (Technical). Supervisor: Office Services
FINANCE— CAPE TOWN
Hughes, W.S.G. B. Comm., C.A. (SA) Assistant Director
Armitage, Mrs C.S. Senior Accountant
Kriel, Ms C.M.M. Senior Accounts Clerk: debtors
Neuwirth, Ms E.V. Accountant: salaries
October, A. Accounts Clerk: salaries
Petersen, R.E. Senior Accounts Clerk: salaries
Roman, D.C. Accounts clerk: cashier
Simon, Ms PI. Assistant Accountant: creditors
Traut, G.D. Senior Accounts Clerk: salaries
Yeomen, Ms I.N. Senior Accounts Clerk: creditors
PERSONNEL— CAPE TOWN
Van Zyl, J.M. M. Econ. (Industrial Psychology) Personnel Manager
Barnard, Mrs A. Chief Telephonist/Receptionist
Blanche, J.G. Principal Personnel Officer: Administration.
Crowie, A.C. Courier
Dollie, Mrs N.J. Office Services
Haupt, Ms C.S. Office Services
Mirkin, Ms Y.A. Senior Typist
Mulder, Mrs G.P Senior Typist
Nicholas, Mrs W.L. Photocopy Machine Operator
Oelofse, Ms V.S. Senior Personnel Clerk
Schutte, Mrs L.A.J. Senior Registration Clerk
Smith, Miss L.G. Chief Typist
Staal, PB. Senior Personnel Officer: labour relations
Van Heerden, L.S. Personnel Officer: recruitment & train-
ing
328
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
EDUCATION & INFORMATION DIRECTORATE
CAPETOWN
Low, A.B. M.Sc. Director: Education & Information
Ashwell, Ms A.N. Head: Education
Davidson, D.C. Head: Graphic Services
Leistner, O.A. Head: Publications (Pretoria)
Potgieter, Mrs E. Head: Mary Gunn Library (Pretoria)
Reynolds, Ms P.Y. Head: Kirstenbosch Library
Ross, Mrs S.I. Cert. Comm. Art, B. Fine Art. Head: Communication
and Promotions
Wells, M.J. Head: Information (Pretoria)
EDUCATION— CAPE TOWN
Ashwell, Ms A.N. M.Sc. Head: Education
Christian, Mrs L.V. B.Sc., H.D.E. (Biology & Geography)
GRAPHIC SERVICES— CAPE TOWN
Davidson, D.C. B.A. Hons. PRISA Final Dipl.
Cupido, Ms H.L. N.D. Journalism. Communication Assistant
Loedolff, Mrs J. B.Sc. Ind. Tech. Photo-grapher/Illustrator
Sims, W.D. Graphics Assistant
INFORMATION— PRETORIA
Wells, M.J. M.Sc. Assistant Director. Weeds research, botanical horticulture,
fynbos utilization and conservation
Joffe, Mrs H. B.Sc. Garden Utilization Officer
LIBRARIES
MARY GUNN LIBRARY, PRETORIA
Potgieter, Mrs E. B.Bibl. Senior Librarian
Coetzer, Mrs H.J. B.A. Library Assistant
KIRSTENBOSCH LIBRARY, CAPE TOWN
Reynolds, Ms P.Y. B.A., H.L.D.S., B.Proc. Senior Librarian
PUBLICATIONS— PRETORIA
Leistner, O.A. D.Sc., F.L.S. Assistant Director, Editing
Brink, S.S. Dip. (Typing). Chief Typesetter. Typesetting,
layout, word processing
Condy, Ms G.S. M.A. Botanical Artist, Colour/pen-and-
ink art work, exhibitions, curation
Du Plessis, Mrs E. B.Sc. Hons. S.E.D. Technical editor.
Editing, translating, layout
Momberg, Mrs B.A. B.Sc. (Entomology & Zoology).
Technical editor. Editing, layout
Mulvenna, Mrs J.M. Dip. (Typing). Principal Typist. Word
processing, typesetting
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
329
GARDENS DIRECTORATE
CAPETOWN
Botha, D.J. D.Sc. Director: Gardens
Britz, R.M. Curator: Harold Porter NBG
Carstens, Mrs M.M. Secretary: Seer. Dip.
Chaplin, P.J. Curator: Witwatersrand NBG
Engelbrecht, B. Curator: Orange Free State NBG
Grobler, P.J. Deputy Director Special Projects
Heilgendorff, J.P Curator: Pretoria NBG
Kluge, J.P. Curator: Lowveld NBG
Oliver, I.B. Curator: Karoo NBG
Tarr, B.B. Curator: Natal NBG
Winter, J.H.S. Curator: Kirstenbosch NBG
PLANNING, MAINTENANCE & DEVELOPMENT— CAPE TOWN
Linde, D.C. N.T.C. (Technician and Inspector of Works). Control Works Inspector
Manasse, S.P Dip. (Masonry). Artisan
Petersen, R.H.W. Artisan’s Assistant
HAROLD PORTER NBG— BETTY’S BAY
Britz, R.M. Dip (Forestry). Chief Research Technician
Abrahams, F. General Assistant I Martinka, A.G. General Assistant II
Abrahamse, S.J. Foreman I Rex, G. General Assistant I
Forrester, J.A. NTC III (Hort.) Senior Research Technician Rex, P. General Assistant I
Harper, C.C. Driver Van Coller, A.E. General Assistant I
Jacobs, L.H. General Assistant I Visser, C.J.J. General Assistant II
KAROO NBG— WORCESTER
Oliver, I.B. N.D. (Hort.), N.D. (PRA) Chief Research Technician
Dlikilili, N.S. General Assistant III
Kecela, S. General Assistant I
Kumeke, A.M. General Assistant II
Made, M.A. General Assistant I
Madumane, M. General Assistant II
Makubalo, F.N. General Assistant III
Makubalo, J. General Assistant II
Monisi, M.M. General Assistant II
Mpayipeli, W.W. General Assistant I
Mpeke, Mrs E.N. General Assistant I
Mtetwa, A.M. Foreman I
Nkoloti, P.M. General Assistant II
Qumba, G.A. General Assistant I
Radebe, M.B. General Assistant III
Sibeko, L.A. General Assistant III
Sibozo, N.E. Driver
Simane, D.K. Foreman I
Smit, Mrs A.C. Senior Administration Clerk
Theoha, P.P. General Assistant III
Tuswa, M.H. General Assistant I
Viljoen, D.M. N.D. (Hort.) Senior Research Technician
Yekiso, S.M. General Assistant II
KIRSTENBOSCH NBG— CAPE TOWN
Winter, J.H.S. N.D. (Hort.). Control Research Technician
CENTRAL
Adonis, JJ.M. General Assistant, Cleaning Services
Arends, Miss L.D. Assistant, Plant Recording
Basson, W. Head, Cleaning Services
De Jonge, Miss K. Typist
De Kock, Mrs M.E. General Assistant, Cleaning Services
Ficks, T.E. Driver
Fredericks, Miss N.C.E. General Assistant
Geduldt, D.C. Engraver
Grace, T. Storeman/Sen. Administration Clerk, Plant Re-
cording
Haynie, R. General Assistant, Workshop
Jacobs, A.P. Information Officer
330
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
CENTRAL
Jacobs, F.H. General Assistant. Stores
Jacobs, K.C. Factotum
Jansen, K.J. Driver
Labuschagne, Mrs C.E. B.Sc. (Hon.) Education Officer
Marent, Mrs H.C. Sen. Admin. Clerk, Plant Recording
McLean, N.S. General Assistant, Workshop
Newman, W. Driver, Workshop
Nicoll, Mrs. R.C. Senior Administration Clerk
Trautman, C.E. Artisan/Supervisor, Workshop
Williams, W.P. Foreman. Drivers
GARDEN
Adonis, A. General Assistant. Ericas
Adams, H. General Assistant. New development
Balabala, L. General Assistant. Dell
Benjamin, R.C.J. Foreman. Annuals
Boonzaaier, I. General Assistant. General garden
Booysen, J.D. General Assistant. Annuals
Bowler, J.H. Foreman. New development
Bowler, M.A. General Assistant. Annuals
Claasens, D. General Assistant. New development
Crowie, H.R. General Assistant. General garden
Crowie, R.W. Foreman. General garden
Hendricks, S. General Assistant. Proteas
Jansen, W. General Assistant. Annuals
Jenkins, A. General Assistant. New development
Johnson, J. General Assistant. Annuals
Julius, J.A. Foreman. Dell
Lewis, D.P. General Assistant. Proteas
Lewis, PS. General Assistant. Proteas
Loft, G.E. General Assistant, Proteas
Lukas, K. General Assistant. General garden
Manuel, D.R. General Assistant. Annuals
Maxwell, PE. General Assistant. New development
McKlein, P. General Assistant. Dell
Morris, J.N.M. General Assistant. Proteas
Palmer, I. General Assistant. General garden
Petersen, A. General Assistant. Cycads
Philander, N. General Assistant. New development
Pietersen, J. General Assistant. New development
Plaatjies, S.D. General Assistant. Proteas
Ruiters, M. General Assistant. New development
Sampson, D. General Assistant. Dell
Sampson, R. General Assistant. General garden
Solomons, E.A. General Assistant. Proteas
Solomons, K.J. General Assistant. Proteas
Van der Westhuizen, A.J. Foreman. Proteas
Van Rooy, K. General Assistant. Annuals
Williams, M.L.J. General Assistant. New development
ESTATE
Le Roux, PH. Chief Research Technician. Estate Manager
Abrahams, M. General Assistant. Estate & Trails
Adams, J. General Assistant. Estate & Trails
Adonis, S.J. General Assistant. Aliens
Alfreds, M. General Assistant. Aliens
Andrews, M.M. General Assistant. Estate & Trails
Baadjies, I. General Assistant. Estate & Trails
Bezuidenhout, A.K. General Assistant. General mainte-
nance
Bouwers, G.G. General Assistant. Construction
Button, J. General Assistant. Estate & Trails
Claasen, F. General Assistant. Aliens
Dollie, Y. General Assistant. Estate & Trails
Fienies, C. General Assistant. General maintenance
Filand, A.J. General Assistant. Estate & Trails
Geswind, A.J. General Assistant. Lawnmowers
Grootboom, C.J. General Assistant. Construction
Hendricks, M. General Assistant. Estate & Trails
Hope, C. General Assistant. Construction
Isaacs, M. General Assistant. Aliens
Jackson, P. General Assistant. Lawnmowers
Jacobs, M.D. General Assistant. Estate & Trails
Jaftha, R. General Assistant. General maintenance
Jaftha, W.R. General Assistant. Construction
Kayster, G.J. Foreman. Construction
Kuscus, G.W. Foreman. General maintenance
Matthews, I.N. General Assistant. Estate & Trails
Mathews, N. General Assistant. Aliens
McLean, A. General Assistant. Aliens
McLean, N. General Assistant. Aliens
Mitchells, G. Foreman. Estate & Trails
Mitchells, R. General Assistant. Aliens
Motaung, J. General Assistant. Estate & Trails
Petersen, J. General Assistant. Aliens
Petersen, N.H. General Assistant. Construction
Plaatjies, D. General Assistant. Aliens
Plaatjies, M.P. General Assistant. Estate & Trails
Reed, T.W. General Assistant. Estate & Trails
Rhode, W.C. General Assistant. Estate & Trails
Sampson, J. Foreman, Aliens
Sampson, J.J. General Assistant. Lawnmowers
Snyders, S.G. General Assistant. Lawnmowers
Solomons, G. General Assistant. Aliens
Solomons, S. General Assistant. Construction
Spiver, P. General Assistant. Aliens
Van der Meulen, C.A. General Assistant. Construction
Van Gusling, E.J. Foreman. Lawnmowers
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
331
NURSERY
Saunders, R.C. N.T.C. Ill (Hort.) Chief Research Technician. Head: Nursery
Adams, H. Foreman. Plant utilization
Adonis, M. General Assistant. Nurseryman
Apolis, A. General Assistant
August, C. General Assistant. Seed room
Berman, R.C. Security
Britz, R.M. N.D. (Forestry). Principal Research Techni-
cian. Head: Security
Carrol, R.R. General Assistant
Daniels, A. General Assistant. Plant utilization
Davids, M. General Assistant. Senior Nurseryman
Davids, M. General Assistant. Seed room
Davids, M.I. General Assistant. Senior Nurseryman
Davids, N. General Assistant. Nurseryman
Duncan, G.D. N.D. (Hort.). Principal Research Technician
Eksteen, M. General Assistant. Succulents
Erasmus, S. Security
Francis, J. General Assistant. Plant utilization
Goliath, Mrs L. General Assistant. Seed room
Gould, Mrs M. N.D. (Hort.). Senior Research Technician
Hendricks, B.D. General Assistant. Succulents
Hitchcock, A.N. N.D. (Hort.), N.H.D. (Hort.). Senior Re-
search Technician
Jacobs, C.W. General Assistant. Nurseryman
Jacobs, D.G. Foreman. Plant utilization
Jacobs, E.C. General Assistant. Seed room
Jacobs, H.C. Security
Jamieson, Mrs H.G. N.D. (Parks & Recreation). Research
Technician
January, C. Security
January, P.C. General Assistant. Plant utilization
Juta, E.C. General Assistant. Plant utilization
Kettledas, PG. General Assistant. Nurseryman
King, O. General Assistant. Nurseryman
Koma, B. General Assistant. Succulents
Kotze, F.G. N.T.C. Ill (Hort.). Principal Research Techni-
cian
Fawrence, E. General Assistant
Lewin, T.B. General Assistant. Nurseryman
Manuel, I.P. Foreman. Seed room
Marthinus, E. General Assistant. Succulents
Mulder, G.R. General Assistant. Nurseryman
Notten, Miss A.F. Student (Temporary)
Pick, Miss U.M. General Assistant. Seed room
Powrie, Miss F.J. B.Sc. (Hon.) N.D. (Hort.), Senior Re-
search Technician
Rudolph, A. Security
Sardien, T.P. General Assistant. Group Deader, succulents
Sauls, C.J. General Assistant. Nurseryman
Siljeur, H.V. General Assistant. Security
Smith, D. General Assistant
Solomons, T. Foreman. Security
Tamboer, J.S. Foreman. Nursery
Thomas, Mrs M.L. Senior Research Technician
Van der Walt, Mrs F.E. N.D. (Hort.). Research Technician
Van Jaarsveld, E.J. M.Sc. N.D. (Hort.). Chief Research
Technician
Van Rooyen, Miss S. General Assistant. Seed room
Van Schalkwyk, J. General Assistant. Succulents
Von Somnitz, Miss B.D. N.D. (Hort.). Kirstenbosch
Scholar (Temporary)
Williams, G.C. General Assistant. Security
LOWVELD — NELSPRU1T
Kluge, J.P. B.Sc. Hons, T.H.O.D. Chief Research Technician
Froneman, W.C. N.D. (Nature Conservation & Manage-
ment), N.D. (Parks & Recreation Admin.), N.T.C.
Ill (Hort.). Principal Research Technician
Hurter, P.J.H. B.Sc. Research Technician
Khoza, D.E. General Assistant
Khoza, F.D. General Assistant
Khumalo, N.S. General Assistant
Khumalo, S.S. General Assistant
Magagula, K.E. General Assistant
Magagula, N.R. General Assistant
Mahlahlubane, F.J. General Assistant
Makamo, Mrs J.E. General Assistant
Makhubela, B.J. General Assistant
Mantseke, N.A. General Assistant
Maqungo, Miss V.L.B. General Assistant
Mazibuko, F.E. General Assistant
Mdhluli, M.B. General Assistant
Mdluli, M.E. General Assistant
Mdluli, S. General Assistant
Mkhatshwa, Mrs N.S. General Assistant
Mteto, E.M. General Assistant
Muswili, K.J. General Assistant
Ngomane, S. General Assistant
Ngqani, Mrs F.S. General Assistant
Ngwengoma, PN. General Assistant
Ngwenya, P.S. General Assistant
Ngwenyama, K.A. General Assistant
Ngwenyama, M.M. General Assistant
Nkosi, M.P General Assistant
Nkosi, Mrs P.B. General Assistant
Nkosi, Mrs S.F. General Assistant
Nyathi, R.M. General Assistant
Shabangu, M.E. General Assistant
Shabangu, S.L. General Assistant
Shabangu, W.N. General Assistant
Shawe, S.A. Foreman
Sibule, B.F. General Assistant
Sibure, M.E. General Assistant
Sibure, W.F. General Assistant
Sigudla, B.M. General Assistant
Soka, M.P. General Assistant
Thabethe, S.S. General Assistant
Van der Walt, Mrs G.A. Administration Clerk
332
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
NATAL NBG — PIETERMARITZBURG
Tarr, B.B. N.D. (Parks & Recreation Admin.), Advanced Dip. (Adult Education).
Chief Research Technician
Busani, M.A. Driver
Dladla, P. General Assistant I
Dlamini, N.S. General Assistant II. Nursery foreman
Dlungwane, R. Foreman
Gabuza, A. General Assistant II
Gates, Ms J.E. N.D. (Hort.), N.D. (Parks & Recreation
Admin.). Sen. Horticulturist. Kniphofia, forest spp.
Kistner, H.A. N.D. (Hort.)
Mbense, A. General Assistant II. Machine operator
Mdluli, K. General Assistant I
Mkize, M. General Assistant I
Mncwabe, Ms A. General Assistant I
Mncwave, P. General Assistant II
Mpangase, Z. General Assistant II
Mpulo, D.H. General Assistant I
Mthalane, A. General Assistant II
Mthembu, D. General Assistant I
Mtolo, C. General Assistant III. Team leader
Nkabini, A. General Assistant II
Nzakwe, W. General Assistant I
Radebe, A. General Assistant I
Van der Merwe, Ms M.E.H. Administration Clerk
Zimu, J. General Assistant II
Zimu, S. General Assistant I
Zondi, Ms B.P. General Assistant I
Zondo, Z. General Assistant II
Zuma, J. General Assistant I
Zuma, Ms K. General Assistant I
ORANGE FREE STATE NBG— BLOEMFONTEIN
Engelbrecht, B. N.D. (Hort.), N.D. (Parks & Recreation Management), N.D. (Forestry)
Chief Research Technician
Eysele, Mrs J.P. Senior Administration Clerk
Kokela, Mrs C.L. General Assistant I. Nursery
Lekheto, M.J. General Assistant III. Maintenance
Lekheto, T.S. General Assistant I. Nursery
Lumley, M.J. Principal Research Technician. Nursery
Mbolekwa, G.M. General Assistant I. Grass garden
Mbolekwa, L.M. General Assistant III. Rhus, display
Mofokeng, J.M. General Assistant II. Nursery
Mofokeng, M.B. General Assistant I. Entrance
Mohokare, J. Driver
Mohapi, Mrs M.A. General Assistant I. Cleaner
Mohapi, T.A. General Assistant III. Grower, nursery
Moima, K.H. Foreman I.
Moima, T.J. General Assistant I. Maintenance
Mopeli, M.J. General Assistant I. Bulb area
Moticoe, Mrs M.A. General Assistant I. Braai area
Nakanyane, R.B. General Assistant III. Pond, display area
Nakedi, N.J. General Assistant II. Estate paths
Olifant, D.M. General Assistant II. Kiosk area
Rampai, M.A. General Assistant I. Maintenance
Sebolai, P.R.A.N. General Assistant III. Nursery, tools
maintenance
Semeyane, T.D. General Assistant II. Maintenance
Thaele, Mrs M.E. General Assistant II. Seed room nursery
PRETORIA NBG
Heilgendorff, J.P. N.H.D. (Hort.) Chief Research Technician
Baloi, R.F. General Assistant II
Baloyi, K.J. General Assistant II
Baloyi, S.J. Driver/Operator
Baloyi, S.M. Research Assistant
Chipi, S. Security Assistant
Chuma, S.J. Security Assistant
Dry, D.H. N.D. (Hort.) Chief Research Technician. Tech-
nical papers on horticulture and plants
Kemp, J. General Assistant I
Keyter, B.A. Senior Security Officer
Klapwijk, N.A. N.D. (Hort.), N.D. (Plant Prod.), N.D.
(Diesel Fitting). First Research Technician. Proteas,
southern part of Pretoria garden
Lephera, J. General Assistant II
Letsoalo, H.M. General Assistant I
Mabasa, J.R. Security Assistant
Mabasa, P.P. General Assistant II
Mabunda, Z.S. General Assistant II
Machika, S.M. General Assistant II
Mahlangu, J.J. General Assistant I
Makena, M.S. Driver/Operator
Makena, S.N. Foreman
Makena, T.J. General Assistant II
Makgopo, C.K. General Assistant II
Makhubela, D. Foreman
Makhubela, K.P General Assistant II
Makoeng, PT. General Assistant II
Makola, J. General Assistant I
Makola, L.M. General Assistant III. Tractor driver
Makua, E.G. General Assistant I
Malewa, D. General Assistant II
Malobola, L. General Assistant II
Malobola, M. General Assistant III
Maluleke, M.J. Security
Mametja, A. General Assistant II
Mariri, N.J. Factotum
Marule, PM. General Assistant III. Tractor driver
Masango, M.G. General Assistant II
Mathabathe, D.S. General Assistant II
Matlala, S.M. General Assistant II
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
333
Matshika, S.P. General Assistant II
Mnyangeni, L.D. General Assistant II
Mogoru, M.F. General Assistant II
Mogoru, S. General Assistant II
Mohale, F.R. Foreman
Mohale, J.N. General Assistant I
Mokawe, N.R. General Assistant I
Molefe, J.R. General Assistant III
Molokomme, J. General Assistant I
Molomo, S.E. General Assistant I
Mononyane, J.B. General Assistant II
Morifi LJ. General Assistant I
Motshweni, V. General Assistant II
Msisa, S.K. General Assistant II
Mudau, R.T. General Assistant I
Muhali, B. General Assistant II
Niemandt, M. Artisan
Nkambule, J. General Assistant I
PRETORIA NBG
Nkoane, J.M. General Assistant I
Nkwana, F.N. Driver/Operator
Noko, J.M. Research Assistant
Noku, A.Y. General Assistant III. Tractor driver
Ramakgaphola, A.M. General Assistant I
Ramatsetse, PM. Security Assistant
Rampopana, A.M. General Assistant I
Sete, L. Foreman
Shirindi, J.R. General Assistant I
Shilubane, E. Storeman Assistant
Sithole, J. General Assistant I
Strydom, D.J.F. N.T.C. Ill (Hort.), N.D. (Parks & Rec.
Management), Chief Research Technician. Cultiva-
tion of mass plants, northern part of Pretoria garden
Swartz, Ms P. M.Sc. (Botany). Senior Horticulturist
Tefu, PR. General Assistant II
Tloubatla, J.L. General Assistant I
Tolo, P.K. General Assistant I
WITWATERS RAND NBG— WILROPARK
Chaplin, P.J. NTC Dip. (Hort.). Chief Research Technician
Behr, Miss C.M. B.Sc. Hons. Principal Research Techni-
cian. Education and information, phytosociological
classification of the Witwatersrand garden
Bongwe, N.W. General Assistant II. Machine operator
Head, Mrs S.E. Senior Administration Clerk
Khedzi, K.P. General Assistant II. Nursery
Lukhwa, N.A. General Assistant I. Garden
Luvhimbi, T.S. General Assistant I. Garden
Majamane, Z.E. General Assistant I. Garden
Mamosebo, M.A. General Assistant I. Garden
Manyikana, T.M. General Assistant I. Garden
Matsea, M.W. General Assistant I. Garden
Mbulaheni, N.P. General Assistant II. Garden
Mulibana, N.S. General Assistant II. Machine operator
Mmola, Ms B.E. General Assistant I. Cleaner
Ndou, A.P. General Assistant I. Garden
Ndou, M.W. General Assistant II. Machine operator
Ndwambi, N.W. General Assistant I. Garden
Ndzondo, N.L. General Assistant III. Clerical Assistant
Nedambale, M.P. General Assistant III. Nursery
Nemalili, M.E. Driver
Nemalili, A.S. General Assistant III. Driver
Nekhavhambe, S.P. General Assistant I. Garden
Nenungwi, M.S. General Assistant I. Nursery
Ngwenya, H.T. General Assistant I. Garden
Rammela, N.N. General Assistant II. Machine operator
Randima, M. General Assistant I. Garden
Raphalalani, V.S. General Assistant I. Nursery
Ravhuhali, P.W. General Assistant I. Garden
Steel, Miss B.S. N.D. (Nature Conservation), Dip. (Jour-
nalism). Research Technician
Tebeile, Ms Z.M. General Assistant III. Clerical Assistant
Tshisikule, G.M. General Assistant II. Garden
Van der Westhuizen, Mrs S. M.Sc. Environmental Educa-
tionalist
RESEARCH DIRECTORATE
PRETORIA
Eloff, Prof. J.N. M.Sc. (Chemistry), D.Sc. (Plant Biochemistry). Director: Research
Smith, G.F. Ph.D., F.L.S. Deputy Director: Research (plant systematics).
Systematics of succulents and rosulate, petaloid monocots.
Meyer, Ms M.C. Dip. Gim. Man. Personal Secretary
Saayman, Mrs E.J.L. M.Sc. Scientific Liaison Officer. Cytotaxonomy
Arnold, T.H. Programme Leader: Data Management
Donaldson, Dr J.S. Programme Leader: Conservation Biology (Cape Town)
Du Plessis, Mrs H. Head: Research Support Services
Koekemoer, Miss M. Curator: National Herbarium (Pretoria)
Oliver, E.G.H. Curator: Stellenbosch Herbarium (Stellenbosch)
Rourke, Dr J.P. Curator: Compton Herbarium (Cape Town)
Rutherford, Dr M.C. Programme Leader: Stress Ecology (Rondebosch)
Williams, Ms R. Curator: Natal Herbarium (Durban)
334
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
DATA MANAGEMENT— PRETORIA
Arnold, T.H. M.Sc. Assistant Director. Computer application especially in taxonomy
De Wet, Mrs B.C. B.Sc., B.A., H.D.L.S. Datametrician Harris, Mrs BJ. Scientific Assistant
Evenwel, Mrs E. Scientific Assistant Joubert, Mrs M.A.E. Senior Data Typist
COMPTON HERBARIUM— CAPE TOWN
Rourke, J.P Ph.D., F.L.S. Specialist Scientist. Systematics of
southern African Proteaceae, Stilbaceae
Cupido, Mrs C. General Assistant
Foster, Mrs S.E. Principal Typist
Holm, Mrs K. Scientific Assistant
Kurzweil, H. Ph.D. Scientist. Systematics of southern Af-
rican terrestrial orchids
Manning, J.C. Ph.D. Scientist. Systematics of Iridaceae
and Orchidaceae, cladistics and biogeography
Paterson-Jones, Mrs D.A. (nee Snijman). Ph.D. Scientist.
Systematics of Amaryllidaceae
Roux, J.P. N.T.C. (Hort.) M.Sc. Scientist. Systematics of
Pteridophyta
Steiner, K.E. Ph.D. Specialist Scientist. Systematics of
Scrophulariaceae and evolutionary interactions be-
tween oil-secreting flowers and oil-collecting bees
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY— CAPE TOWN
Donaldson, J.S. M.Sc. (Entomology), Ph.D. (Zoology). Assistant Director. Cycad biology,
plant/insect interactions, conservation biology
Botha, PA. N.H.D. (Hort.). Scientific Officer. Tissue cul-
ture research
Bowler, Mrs M. General Assistant
Brown, N.A.C. Ph.D. Specialist Scientist. Seed biology
research, plant growth regulators
De Lange, J.H. B.Sc. (Hort.), M.Sc. (Plant Physiology),
D.Sc. (Agric.) Specialist Scientist. Ecology, tissue
culture, horticulture
Jita, Ms G.N. General Assistant
Kohly, Miss N. B.Sc. (Entomology & Microbiology). Sci-
entific Officer. Scientific illustration
Leivers, S. B.Sc. (Microbiology, Plant Virology). Com-
mercial tissue culture
McDonald, D.J. M.Sc. Scientist. Wetlands, salt marshes,
coastal vegetation
Nanni, Ms I. B.Sc., H.E.D. Scientific Officer. Ecology,
seed biology
Parenzee, Ms H.A. Administrative Assistant
Rebelo, A.G. Ph.D. (Zoology). Scientist. Conservation bi-
ology, biogeography
Scott, Mrs G. B.Sc. (Pharmacy), M.Sc. Scientific Officer.
Plant secondary compounds, medicinal plants
NATAL HERBARIUM— DURBAN
Williams, Ms R. B.Sc. Hons, H.D.E. Scientific Officer
De Jager, PJ. M.Sc. Ethnobotanist. Noble, Mrs H-E. Administration Clerk.
Mbonambi, M.B. General Assistant. Gardener Nzimande, S.B. General Assistant
Ngwenya, M.A. Herb. Assist. Identification, information Sikhakhane, T.B. Herbarium Assistant.
NATIONAL HERBARIUM— PRETORIA
Koekemoer, Miss M. M.Sc. Curator. Assistant Director. Taxonomy of Poaceae, Asteraceae;
Disparago and related genera
Anderson, H.M. Ph.D. Scientist. Palaeobotany, palaeo-
geography
Anderson, J.M. Ph.D. Specialist Scientist. Palaeobotany,
palaeogeography
Archer, R.H. M.Sc. Scientific Officer. Taxonomy of
mainly Celastraceae, Euphorbiaceae
Bredenkamp, C.L. M.Sc. Scientific Officer. Taxonomy of
Vitex, Rhamnaceae, Sterculiaceae and other related
families
Burgoyne, PM. B.Sc. (Hons). Scientific Assistant
Cloete, M. Dip. (Typing). Typist
Dreyer, Miss L.L. M.Sc. Scientific Officer. Taxonomy of
mainly Geraniaceae
Fish, Mrs L. B.Sc. Scientific Officer. Poaceae. Identifica-
tions, collecting
Germishuizen, G. M.Sc. Scientist. Plant identifications,
taxonomy of Polygonaceae, Fabaceae, Lorantha-
ceae, Viscaceae
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
335
Glen, H.F. Ph.D. Scientist. Taxonomy of trees and succu-
lents, especially Aloe, also cultivated plants
Glen, Mrs R.P. M.Sc. Scientific Assistant. Ferns.
Herman, P.P.J. M. Sc. Scientific Officer. Identifications,
Rubiaceae — Asteraceae, Flora of Transvaal
Heymann, Mrs M.Z. T.E. Dip. Scientific Assistant
Jordaan, Mrs M. B.Sc. Scientific Officer. Taxonomy of
Casuarinaceae — Connaraceae
Lephaka, M.G. Scientific Assistant. Parcelling and press-
ing
Makgakga, M.C. General Assistant
Makgakga, S.K. Scientific Assistant. Mounting and filing
of herbarium specimens
Meyer, J.J. N.D. (Teaching). Scientific Assistant
Meyer, N.L. B.Sc. (Hons). Scientific Officer. Taxonomy
of Liliaceae
Perold, Mrs S.M. D.Sc. Scientist. Taxonomy of Ricciaceae
(Hepaticae)
Phahla, T.J. Scientific Assistant. Mounting and filing of
herbarium specimens
Ready, Mrs J.A. N.D. (Hort.) Scientific Assistant
Reid, Miss C. M.Sc. Scientist. Monocotyledons. Taxon-
omy of Cyperaceae
Retief, Miss E. M.Sc. Scientist. Pollen studies of
Boraginaceae. Taxonomy of Boraginaceae, Ver-
benaceae, Lamiaceae, Scrophulariaceae, Acantha-
ceae
Rossouw, G.L. Scientific Assistant
Smithies, Mrs S.J. M.Sc. Senior Scientific Officer. Tax-
onomy of mainly Scrophulariaceae, Selaginaceae,
Lobeliaceae
Strohmaier, Mrs S.M. T.E. Dip. Scientific Assistant
Van Rooy, J. M.Sc. Scientist. Taxonomy and biogeography
of mosses
Van Wyk, Mrs C.M. M.Sc. Scientist. Melolobium, Pelar-
gonium. Taxonomy of Rutaceae, Thymelaeaceae,
Apiaceae, Ericaceae
Veldman, Mrs J.M. Administration Clerk
Welman, Miss W.G. M.Sc. Scientist. Taxonomy of Con-
volvulaceae — Asteraceae
STELLENBOSCH HERBARIUM
Oliver, E.G.H. M.Sc. Curator. Scientist. Taxonomy of the Ericoideae (Ericaceae)
Beyers, Mrs J.B.P. M.Sc. Scientist. Taxonomy of the Fellingham, Mrs A.C. B.Sc. Scientific Officer. Taxonomy
Gnidieae (Thymelaeaceae) of Cliff ortia (Rosaceae)
Davidse, Mrs E. Scientific Assistant Leith, Mrs J. Administration Clerk
STRESS ECOLOGY— UCT RONDEBOSCH
Rutherford, M.C. Ph.D., Dip. Datamet. Programme Leader. Stress and disturbance ecology
Davis, G.W. Ph.D. Scientist. Ecophysiology, resource
modelling
De Wit, D.M. Scientific Assistant
Fritz, M.F. Scientific Assistant
Hoffman, M.T. Ph.D. Scientist. Disturbance ecology,
desertification, photography
Hunter, Ms D.A. Administrative secretary
Jagger, B.W. Scientific Assistant
Midgley, G.F. M.Sc. Scientist. Plant stress physiology/
ecology
Musil, C.F. Ph.D. Scientist. Aquatic and terrestrial plant
ecophysiology
O'Callaghan, M.G. M.Sc. Scientist (Stellenbosch). Wet-
lands, salt marshes, coastal vegetation
Powrie, L.W. M.Sc. Scientist. Karoo ecology, education.
computer programming/operations
Wand, S.J.E. M.Sc. (Agric.) Scientific Officer. Ecophysi-
ology
RESEARCH SUPPORT SERVICES— PRETORIA
Du Plessis, Mrs. H. M.Sc. Head of Cost Centre. Scientist. Cytogenetics
Botha, Mrs A.G. Scientific Assistant. Anatomy Roux, Mrs W.J.G. Dip. (Private Secretary). Scientific As-
Romanowski, Mrs A.J. Dip. (Photography). Industrial sistant. Graphic artist, biology
Technician (Photography). Scientific photogra- Steyn, Miss C.C. Scientific Assistant. Anatomy
phy. Steyn, Mrs E.M.A. Ph.D. Scientist. Embryology
336
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
PUBLICATIONS BY THE STAFF
(1992-04-01—1993-03-31)
ANDERSON, H.M. 1992. Anomalous cones on a specimen of En-
cephala rlos transvenosus. Veld & Flora 78: 79.
ARCHER, R.H. 1992. A new species of Maytenus (Celastraceae) from
southern Natal and Transkei. South African Journal of Botany 58:
393-396.
ARCHER, R.H. & VAN WYK, A.E. 1992. Palynology and intergeneric
relationships of some southern African species of subfamily
Cassinoideae. Grana 31: 241-252.
ARCHER, R.H. & VAN WYK, A.E. 1993. Bark structure and interge-
neric relationships of some southern African Cassinoideae
(Celastraceae). IAWA Journal 14: 35-53.
BRUSSE, F. 1992a. A new species of Bullatina from the Transkei Wild
Coast. Bothalia 22: 44-46.
BRUSSE, F. 1992b. A new species in the lichen genus Heterodermia ,
from coastal Namaqualand. Bothalia 22: 183-185.
CUNNINGHAM, A.B., DE JAGER, RJ. & HANSEN L.C.B. 1992. The
Indigenous Plant Use Programme. Foundation for Research De-
velopment, Pretoria.
DAVIS, G.W. 1992a. Commercial exploitation of natural vegetation: an
exploratory model for management of the wildflower industry in
the Fynbos Biome of the Cape, South Africa. Journal of Environ-
mental Management 35: 13-29.
DAVIS, G.W. 1992b. Effects of tillage on nutrients, energy and water in
a heathland soil: disturbance of a natural system in the mountain
fynbos of the southwestern Cape, South Africa. Soil and Tillage
Research 24: 29-45.
DAVIS, G.W. 1992c. Regeneration traits in the weakly serotinous obli-
gate seeder Leucadendron xanthoconus (Proteaceae). South Afri-
can Journal of Botany 58: 125-128.
DAVIS, G.W. 1992d. Editorial. Bulletin of the South African Institute of
Ecologists 11,1: 1-4.
DAVIS, G.W. 1992e. The ecologist under pressure. Bulletin of the South
African Institute of Ecologists 11,2: 1.
DAVIS, G.W. 1992f. Chlorophyll fluorescence for the compleat idiot: a
quick look at the Morgan CF-1000 Portable Chlorophyll Fluores-
cence Measurement System. Bulletin of the South African Insti-
tute of Ecologists 11 ,2: 18, 19.
DAVIS, G.W. 1992g. Ecological, human and blue. Bulletin of the South
African Institute of Ecologists 1 1,3: 1, 2.
DAVIS, G.W., COWLING R.M, BAILEY, C.L. & MIDGLEY, G.F.
1992. Morphological and ecophysiological attributes of potential
plant invaders in mediterranean-type systems: the case o/Banksia
speciosa in the fynbos. Proceedings of MEDECOS VI, the 6th
International Conference on mediterranean-type ecosystems,
Crete 1991: 341-346.
DAVIS, G.W., COWLING, R.M., COETZEE, E. & ZIBAYA, S. (eds)
1992. Science policy options for a democratic South Africa. Pro-
ceedings of a workshop held at University of the Western Cape.
Sept 1991. IDASA, Cape Town.
DAVIS, G.W., KEELEY, J. & LAMONT, B.B. 1992. Biodiversity and
system function in mediterranean-type ecosystems. Bulletin of the
South African Institute of Ecologists 11,3:4,5.
DE WINTER, B., KILLICK, D.J.B., GIBBS RUSSELL, B.E.,
ROURKE, J.P., OLIVER, E.G.H. & LEACH, L.C. 1992. (93)
Proposal to limit the retro-activity of Article 8.3. Taxon 41:
359.
DONALDSON, J.S. 1992a. Adaptation for oviposition into concealed
cycad ovules in the cycad weevils Antliarhinus zamiae and A.
signatus (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea). Biological Journal of the
Linnean Society 46: 23-35.
DONALDSON, J.S. 1992b. Tribute to a remarkable flora. South African
Journal of Science 88: 454-456.
DRY, D.H. 1992a. Smodingium argutum. Parke en Rekreasiebestuur
49,3: 14, 15.
DRY, D.H. 1992b. Die benaming van plante. Park & Recreation Manage-
ment 50,4: 11, 12.
DRY, D.H., 1992c. A progressive breakthrough in the vegetation propaga-
tion of the stinkwood tree. Parks & Grounds 70: 82-84.
DUNCAN, G.D. 1992a. Endangered monocots rediscovered in the Bo-
land. Veld & Flora 78: 72, 73.
DUNCAN, G.D. 1992b. Clivias in Kyushu and Welwitschias in Kyoto.
Veld & Flora 78: 76, 77.
DUNCAN, G.D. 1993. Sixth International Symposium on flower bulbs.
Veld & Flora 79: 16.
DU PLESSIS, E. 1992a. Plant names given to communicate, now per-
ceived to humiliate. Veld & Flora 78: 132, 133.
DU PLESSIS, E. 1992b. Review: South West African botany, by W.
Giess. Bothalia 22: 155.
DU PLESSIS. H. & SPIES, J.J. 1992. Chromosome numbers in the genus
Pentaschistis (Poaceae, Danthonieae). Taxon 41: 709-720.
GERMISHUIZEN, G. 1992. Lessertia sneeuwbergensis, a new species
from the Middelburg District of the central Cape Province
(Fabaceae). Bothalia 22: 189, 190.
GLEN, H.F. 1992a. The curious history of the money cowrie. ASANS
Journal 4: 26-33.
GLEN, H.F. 1992b. National Botanical Institute. Glasnik (Johannesburg)
1-92: 26.
GLEN, H.F. 1992c. Peltophorum africanum. Trees in South Africa 43: 2,
3.
GLEN, H.F. 1992d. Enseleni Nature Reserve: a tourist’s eye view. Trees
in South Africa 43: 5-7.
GLEN, H.F. 1992e. Knobthorn liqueur a la tree society. Trees in South
Africa 43:7.
GLEN, H.F. 1992f. The do-it-yourself mythology of G.B. Ferari. Trees in
South Africa 43: 8-11.
GLEN, H.F. (ed. board) 1992g. In J. Lundquist, Index Holmiensis VII
(information on southern African distribution maps). Swedish
Museum of Natural History, Stockholm.
GLEN, H.F. & HARDY, D.S. 1992a. Aloe buchlohii. The Flowering
Plants of Africa 52: t. 2047.
GLEN, H.F. & HARDY, D.S. 1992b. Aloe laeta. The Flowering Plants of
Africa 52: t. 2048.
GLEN, H.F., HARDY, D.S. & LAVRANOS, J.J. 1992. Aloe guillaumetii.
The Flowering Plants of Africa 52: t. 2046.
GLEN, R.P. 1993. Pteridophytes: the mysterious plants that have no
seeds. Lantern , Feb.: 48-51.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 1992. Systematics of the southern
African Lapeirousia corymbosa complex (Iridaceae-Ixioideae),
with L. neglecta sp. nov. South African Journal of Botany 58:
326-336.
HARDY, D.S. & GLEN, H.F. 1992. Uncarina decaryi. The Flowering
Plants of Africa 52: t. 2056.
HITCHCOCK, A.N. & BRITZ, G.J. 1992. More pincushions
{Leucospe rmum ) cultivars available from Kirstenbosch. Ve/d &
Flora 78: 74, 75.
HOFFMAN, M.T. 1992a. Functional dioecy in Echinocereus coccineus
(Cacteae): breeding system, sex ratios and geographic range of
floral dimorphism. American Journal of Botany 79: 1382-1388.
HOFFMAN, M.T. 1992b. Long term ecological research in the United
States and South Africa. SAIE Bulletin 11,1: 18-21.
HUNTLEY, BJ. 1992. The Fynbos Biome Project. In R.M. Cowling, The
ecology of fynbos: nutrients, fire and diversity: 1-5. Oxford Uni-
versity Press.
JOFFE, H„ BRINK, S.S. & DU PLESSIS, E. 1992. Highveld tree pack.
pp. 16. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria.
KURZWEIL, H. 1992. An analysis of the orchid flora of Mt Mulanje,
Malawi. Bothalia 22: 235-243.
KURZWEIL, H. & DREWE, P. 1992. The Femkloof Nature Reserve
after fire — a paradise for ground orchids. South African Orchid
Journal 23: 92-94.
KURZWEIL, H. & LINDER, H.P. 1992. A comparative study of the
floral morphology in the genus Disperis (Orchidaceae). Beitrdge
zur Biologie der Pflanzen 66: 433^4-77.
KURZWEIL, H. & JOHNSON, S.D. 1993. Autogamy in Monadenia
bracteata. South African Orchid Journal 24: 21.
LE ROUX, J.J. BROWN, N.A.C. & LEIVERS, S. 1992. Micropropaga-
tion of Aspalathus linearis through bud multiplication. Plant Cell,
Tissue and Organ Culture 28: 225-227.
LEISTNER, O.A. 1992. Deutscher Beitrag zur Botanik Stidafrikas. Echo ,
Mare 1992: 43—47.
LILTVED, B. & KURZWEIL, H. 1992. Betty’s Bay fire stimulates rich
display of orchids. Veld & Flora 78: 46-49.
LOW, A.B. 1993. The role of the National Botanical Institute in the urban
environment. Parks and Recreation Management 5 1 : 17-20.
MCDONALD, D.J. & POWRIE, F.J. 1992. Pelargonium tricolor: a
colourful candidate for cultivation. Veld & Flora 78: 68-71.
MCDONALD, D.J. & VAN DER WALT, J.J.A. 1992. Observations on
the pollination of Pelargonium tricolor , section Camphylia
(Geraniaceae). South African Journal of Botany 58: 386-392.
MCDONALD, D.J., OLIVER, E.G.H., LINDER, H.P. & BOUCHER, C.
1993. Is there alpine vegetation on the mountains of the south-
western Cape? Veld & Flora 79: 17-19.
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
337
MCDOWELL, C. & OLIVER, E.G.H. 1992a. Extinct Erica rediscov-
ered. African Wildlife 46: 1 13.
MCDOWELL, C. & OLIVER, E.G.H. 1992b. Will pine plantations exter-
minate the recently re-discovered Erica alexandril Veld & Flora
78: 88, 89.
MIDGLEY, G.F., RUTHERFORD, M.C., DAVIS, G.W., & BOSEN-
BERG, J. DE W. 1992. Photosynthetic responses of heliophilous
Rhus species to environmental modification by invasive shrubs.
Functional Ecology 6: 334—345.
MUSIL, C.F. & BHAGWANDIN, N. 1992. The SUN program for com-
putation of solar ultraviolet spectral irradiances: solar exposure
limits in South Africa. South African Journal of Science 88:
406-410.
O’CALLAGHAN, M. 1992. The ecology and identification of the south-
ern African Salicomeae (Chenopodiaceae). South African Journal
of Botany 58: 430^439.
O’CALLAGHAN, M. & OLIVER, E.G.H. 1992. Transfer of
Arthrocnemum varieties to Sarcocomia (Chenopodiaceae). South
African Journal of Botany 58: 540.
O’CONNOR, T.G. & PICKETT, G.A. 1992. The influence of grazing on
seed production and seed banks of some African savanna grass-
lands. Journal of Applied Ecology 29: 247-260.
OLIVER, E.G.H. 1992a. Foreword. In A.W. Schumann & G. Kirsten,
Ericas of South Africa. Femwood Press, Cape Town.
OLIVER, E.G.H. 1992b. Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae). IX. New
combinations for Philippia are made in Erica for the Flora
zambesiaca region. Kew Bulletin 47: 665-668.
OLIVER, E.G.H., FELLINGHAM, A.C. & VAN WYK, B.-E. 1992. A
new species of Priestleya from the southwestern Cape. Bothalia
22:47-51.
PEROLD, S.M. 1992a. Studies in the genus Riccia (Marchantiales) from
southern Africa. 24. R. moenkemeyeri, subgenus Ricciella: new
records. Bothalia 22: 19-22.
PEROLD, S.M. 1992b. The occurrence in southern Africa of the hepatic
Symphyogyna brasiliensis (Pallaviciniaceae). Bothalia 22: 53-58.
PEROLD, S.M. 1992c. Cololejeuna cardiocarpa , an epiphyllous liver-
wort in southern Africa. Bothalia 22: 177-182.
PEROLD, S.M. 1992d. Lectotypification of Riccia crystallina
(Ricciaceae). Bothalia 22: 185-287.
PEROLD, S.M. 1992e. Whither bryology in southern Africa? Forum
Botanicum 29: 1, 3.
POWRIE, F.J. 1992a. Growing Staavias — new rare plants in cultivation.
Botanic Gardens Conservation News 2,1: 51-55.
POWRIE, F.J. 1992b. Who says they are boring? The Journal of the
Australian Geranium Society 32,4: 7-10.
POWRIE, L.W. 1993. Responses of Karoo plants to hail damage near
Williston, Cape Province. South African Journal of Botany 59:
65-68.
REBELO, A.G. 1992a. Protea Atlas Project: a spectacular year of atlass-
ing. Veld & Flora 79: 26, 27.
REBELO, A.G. 1992b. Red Data Book species in the Cape Floristic
Region: threats, priorities and target species. Transactions of the
Royal Society of South Africa 48: 243-252.
REBELO, A.G. & SIEGFRIED, W.R. 1992. Where should nature re-
serves be located in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa?
Models for the spatial configuration of a reserve network aimed at
maximizing the protection of floral diversity. Conservation Biol-
ogy 5: 243-252.
ROBBERTSE, P.J. & STEYN, E.M.A. 1992. Leaf characters of various
tea clones in relation to quality. South African Journal of Plant
and Soil 9:217-219.
ROURKE, J.P. 1 992a. The correct author citation for Paranomus reflexus
(Proteaceae). Bothalia 22: 43.
ROURKE, J.P. 1992b. Stilbe verticillata, the correct name for the species
previously known as Stilbe mucronata (Stilbaceae). Bothalia 22:
192.
ROURKE, J.P. & MANNING, J.C. 1992. The Ven. Charles Theophilus
Hahn, a hitherto unknown Edwardian botanical illustrator in
Natal, 1908-1916. Bothalia 22: 145-153.
ROUX, J.P. 1992a. Systematic studies in the genus Mohria (Pteridophyta:
Anemiaceae). II. Comparative vestiture morphology and phylog-
eny. South African Journal of Botany 58: 215-219.
ROUX, J.P. 1992b. Systematic studies in the genus Mohria (Pteridophyta:
Anemiaceae). III. Sporangium and spore morphology. Bothalia
22: 199-204.
ROUX, J.P, RYAN, P.G., MILTON, S.J. & MOLONEY, C.L. 1992.
Vegetation and checklist of Inaccessible Island, central South
Atlantic Ocean, with notes on Nightingale Island. Bothalia 22:
93-109.
ROUX, J.P, VAN DER WALT, J.J.A. & VAN DER MERWE, R.B. 1992.
Systematic studies in the genus Mohria (Pteridophyta: An-
emiaceae) I. Comparative anatomy and morphology of the rhi-
zome. South African Journal of Botany 58: 83-89.
RUTHERFORD, M.C., MIDGLEY, G.F. & DAVIS, G.W. 1993. Covert
symptoms of pollution stress in introduced vegetation near Cape
Town. South African Journal of Science 89: 50, 51.
SAUNDERS, R.C. 1992a. Review: Ericas of southern Africa. African
Wild Life 46: 289.
SAUNDERS, R.C. 1992b Guest editorial. Veld & Flora 78: 6.
SAUNDERS, R.C. 1993. Review: Sowing seed and so on, by Yvette van
Wijk. Veld & Flora 79: 31.
SERGIO, C. & PEROLD, S.M. 1992. A new species of Riccia L. from the
island of Madeira, R. atlantica sp. nov. C. Sergio & S.M. Perold.
The Bryologist 17: 127-132.
SMITH, G.F. 1993a. Familial orthography: Aloeaceae vs. Aloaceae.
Taxon 42: 87 — 90.
SMITH, G.F. 1993b. Changes at the National Herbarium in Pretoria.
Taxon 42: 276.
SNIJMAN, D.A. 1992. Notes on the Strumariinae (Amaryllidaceae). Six
new taxa in Strumaria and Hessea from the central and northwest-
ern Cape, South Africa, and southern Namibia. Bothalia 22: 1-11.
SPIES. J.J., DAVIDSE, G. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1992. Cytogenetic studies
in the genus Tribolium (Poaceae: Arundineae). American Journal
of Botany 79: 689-700.
STEINER, K.E. 1993a. Has Ixianthes (Scrophulariaceae) lost its special
bee? Plant Systematics & Evolution 185: 7-16.
STEINER, K.E. 1993b. Oil orchids and oil bees in southern Africa:
Disperis and Rediviva. South African Orchid Journal 24: 2-5.
STEYN, E.M.A. & ROBBERTSE, P.J. 1992. Is aril development in the
litchi triggered by pollen tube growth? South African Journal of
Botany 58: 258-262.
TERBLANCHE, R.F., SMITH, G.F. & THEUNISSEN, J.D. 1993. Did
Scott typify names in Haworthia (Asphodelaceae: Alooideae)?
Taxon 42:91-95.
VAN JAARSVELD, E. 1992a. Bowiea gariepensis and Bowiea volubilis.
National Cactus & Succulent Journal (Great Britain) December:
119, 120.
VAN JAARSVELD, E. 1992b. Gasteria glomerata. Journal of the Japan-
ese Succulent Plant Society, Japan 300: 55.
VAN JAARSVELD, E. 1992c. Welwitschia mirabilis in cultivation at
Kirstenbosch. Veld & Flora 78: 119, 120.
VAN JAARSVELD, E. 1992d. Natural shades, indigenous gardening.
Garden & Home , Sept.: 132-135.
VAN JAARSVELD, E. 1992e. Indigenous succulents. Garden & Home,
November: 136-138.
VAN ROOY, J. 1992a. Notes on the moss flora of Zimbabwe, Bothalia
22: 196.
VAN ROOY, J. 1992b. The genus Amphidium Schimp. in southern Africa.
Lindbergia 17: 59-63.
VAN ROOY J. & PEROLD, S.M. 1992a. New and interesting records of
mosses in the Flora of southern Africa area: 2. Gigaspermaceae-
Bartramiaceae (Bryophyta). Bothalia 22: 37.
VAN ROOY J. & PEROLD, S.M. 1992b. New and interesting records of
mosses in the Flora of southern Africa area: 3. Miscellaneous
acrocarpous taxa (Bryophyta). Bothalia 22: 195.
VAN ROOY, J. & VAN WYK, A.E. 1992. A conspectus of the subfamily
Macromitrioideae (Bryopsida: Orthotrichaceae) in southern
Africa. The Bryologist 95: 205-215.
VAN WILGEN, B.W.' & MCDONALD, D.J. 1992. The Swartboskloof
Experimental Site. In B.W. Van Wilgen, D.M. Richardson, F.J.
Kruger, & H.J. Van Hensbergen, Fires in South African Mountain
Fynbos: ecosystem, community and species response at
Swartboskloof. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg.
VAN WYK, B.-E., WHITEHEAD, C.S., GLEN, H.F., HARDY, D.S.,
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. & SMITH, G.F. 1993. Nectar sugar
composition in the subfamily Alooideae (Asphodelaceae) Bio-
chemical Systematics and Evolution 21: 249-253.
WELLS, M.J. 1992a. Lowveld National Botanical Garden. National Bo-
tanical Institute Garden Brochure.
WELLS, M.J. 1992b. Pretoria National Botanical Garden. National Bo-
tanical Institute Garden Brochure.
WELLS, M.J. 1992c. Witwatersrand National Botanical Garden. Na-
tional Botanical Institute Garden Brochure.
WELLS, M.J. & BRINK, E. 1992. Obituary: Amy Frances May Gordon
Jacot Guillarmod, nee Hean (191 1-1992). Bothalia 22: 295-300.
'
Bothalia 23,2: 339-347 (1993)
Guide for authors to Bothalia
This guide is updated when necessary and includes an
index. Important points and latest additions appear in
bold type.
Bothalia is named in honour of General Louis Botha,
first Premier and Minister of Agriculture of the Union of
South Africa. This house journal of the N ational Botanical
Institute, Pretoria, is devoted to the furtherance of botani-
cal science. The main fields covered are taxonomy, ecol-
ogy, anatomy and cytology. Two parts of the journal and
an index to contents, authors and subjects are published
annually.
1 Editorial policy
Bothalia welcomes original papers dealing with flora
and vegetation of southern Africa and related subjects.
Full-length papers and short notes, as well as book re-
views, are accepted. Manuscripts may be written in either
English or Afrikaans.
Articles are assessed by referees, both local and over-
seas. Authors are welcome to suggest possible referees to
judge their work. Authors are responsible for the factual
correctness of their contributions. Bothalia maintains an
editorial board (see title page) to ensure that international
standards are upheld.
Hard copy of articles should preferably be accom-
panied by PC diskettes or stiffies.
2 Requirements for diskettes/stiffies
2.1 data must be IBM compatible and written in MSWord
5.5 or in ASCII.
2.2 a printout of the diskette should be supplied to indicate
(in pencil) the necessary page numbers, underlining,
paragraphs etc.
2.3 tables need not be placed on the diskette — a clearly
laid out hard copy is adequate.
2.4 the diskette must have double line spacing.
2.5 do not justify lines.
2.6 do not break words, except hyphenated words.
2.7 all lines, headings, keys, etc., should start flush at the
margin, therefore no indentations of any kind.
2.8 no italics, bold or underlined words. Only MSS sub-
mitted in MSWord 5.5 should use formatting for bold
and italics.
2.9 paragraphs and headings are delineated by an extra
line spacing (carriage return) and no indentation.
2.10 a hyphen is designated as one dash, with no space
between the letter and the dash, e.g. ovate-lanceolate. See
also 17.6.
2.11 an N-dash is typed as three hyphens with no space
between the letter and the hyphen, e.g. 2 — 5 mm (typeset,
it looks like this, 2-5 mm).
2.12 an M-dash is typed as two hyphens with no space
between the letter and the hyphen, e.g. computers — what
a blessing! (typeset, it looks like this, computers — what).
2.13 do not use a double space between words, after com-
mas, full stops, colons, semicolons or exclamation marks.
2.14 use lower case x as a times sign, with one space on
either side of the x, e.g. 2x3 mm.
2.15 use single (not double) opening and closing quotes,
e.g. the so-called ‘stiffy’ refers to a rigid diskette.
2.16 keys — put only three leader dots before number and
name of taxon (with one space before and one space
after the first and last dot), regardless of how far or near
the word is from the right margin, e.g. ... 1. R. ovata.
3 Requirements for a manuscript
3.1 Manuscripts should be typewritten on one side of good
quality A4-size paper, double-spaced throughout (includ-
ing abstract, tables, captions to figures, literature refer-
ences, etc.) and have a margin of at least 30 mm all round.
The original and three photocopies (preferably photo-
copied on both sides of the paper to reduce weight for
postage) of all items, including text, illustrations, tables
and lists should be submitted, and the author should retain
a complete set of copies.
3.2 Papers should conform to the general style and layout
of recent issues of Bothalia (from volume 17 onwards).
3.3 Material should be presented in the following se-
quence: Title page with title, name(s) of author(s), key-
words, abstracts (in English and Afrikaans) and in-
formation that should be placed in a footnote on the title
page, such as address! es) of author(s) and mention of
granting agencies.
3.4 The sequence continues with Introduction and aims.
Material and methods, Results, Interpretation (Discus-
sion), Specimens examined (in revisions and mono-
graphs), Acknowledgements, References, Index of names
(recommended for revisions dealing with more than about
15 species). Tables, Captions for figures and figures. In
the case of short notes and book reviews, keywords and
abstract are superfluous.
3.5 All pages must be numbered by hand in pencil (not
on the diskette or printout) beginning with the title page
to those with references, tables and captions to figures.
340
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
3.6 For notes on the use of hyphens and dashes see 2.10
to 2.12.
4 Author(s)
When there are several authors the covering letter
should indicate clearly which of them is responsible for
correspondence and, if possible, telephonically available
while the article is being processed. The contact address,
telephone number and fax number should be mentioned if
they differ from those given on the letterhead.
5 Title
The title should be as concise and as informative as
possible. In articles dealing with taxonomy or closely
related subjects the family of the taxon under discussion
(see also 13.2) should be mentioned in brackets but author
citations should be omitted from plant names.
6 Keywords
Up to 10 keywords (or index terms) should be provided
in English in alphabetical sequence. The following points
should be borne in mind when selecting keywords:
6. 1 keywords should be unambiguous, internationally ac-
ceptable words and not recently coined little-known
words.
6.2 they should be in a noun form and verbs should be
avoided.
6.3 they should not consist of an adjective alone; adjec-
tives should be combined with nouns.
6.4 they should not contain prepositions.
6.5 the singular form should be used for processes and
properties, e.g. evaporation.
6.6 the plural form should be used for physical objects,
e.g. augers.
6.7 location (province and/or country); taxa (species,
genus, family) and vegetation type (community, veld type,
biome) should be used as keywords.
6.8 keywords should be selected hierarchically where pos-
sible, e.g. both family and species should be included.
6.9 they should include terms used in the title.
6.10 they should answer the following questions:
6.10.1 what is the active concept in the document (activity,
operation or process).
6.10.2, what is the passive concept or object of the active
process (item on which the activity, operation or process
takes place).
6.10.3, what is the means of accomplishment or how is
the active concept achieved (technique, method, appara-
tus, operation or process).
6.10.4 what is the environment in which the active con-
cept takes place (medium, location).
6.10.5 what are the independent (controlled) and depen-
dent variables?
6.11 questions 6.10.1 to 6.10.3 should preferably also be
answered in the title.
7 Abstract
7.1 Abstracts of no more than 200 words should be pro-
vided in English and Afrikaans. Abstracts are of great im-
portance and should convey the essence of the article.
7.2 They should refer to the geographical area concerned
and, in taxonomic articles, mention the number of taxa
treated. They should not contain information not appear-
ing in the article.
7.3 In articles dealing with taxonomy or closely related
subjects all taxa from the rank of genus downwards should
be accompanied by their author citations.
7.4 Names of new taxa and new combinations should not
be underlined. If the article deals with too many taxa,
only the important ones should be mentioned.
8 Table of contents
A table of contents should be given for all articles
longer than about 20 typed pages, unless they follow the
strict format of a taxonomic revision.
9 Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements should be kept to the minimum
compatible with the requirements of courtesy. Please give
all the initials of the person(s) you are thanking.
10 Literature references
In text
10.1 Literature references in the text should be cited as
follows: ‘Jones & Smith (1986) stated...’, or ‘...(Jones &
Smith 1986)’ or (Ellis 1988: 67) when giving a reference
simply as authority for a statement. For treatment of lit-
erature references in taxomonic papers see 14.
10.2 When more than two authors are involved in the
paper use the name of the first author followed by et al.
10.3 When referring to more than one literature reference,
they should be arranged alphabetically according to author
and separated by a semicolon, e.g. (Anon. 1981, 1984;
Davis 1976; Nixon 1940).
10.4 Titles of books and names of journals should pref-
erably not be mentioned in the text. If there is good reason
for doing so, they should be treated as described in 10.12
& 10.13.
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
341
10.5 Personal communications are given only in the text,
not in the list of references. Please add the person’s full
initials to identify the person more positively, e.g. C. Bou-
cher pers. comm.
In References at end of article
10.6 References of the same author are arranged in chron-
ological sequence.
10.7 Where two or more references by the same author
are listed in succession, the author’s name is repeated with
every reference.
10.8 All publications referred to in the text, including
those mentioned in full in the treatment of correct
names in taxonomic papers, but no others, and no per-
sonal communications, are listed at the end of the manu-
script under the heading References.
10.9 The references are arranged alphabetically according
to authors and chronologically under each author, with a,
b, c, etc. added to the year, if the author has published
more than one work in a year.
10.10 If an author has published both on his own and as
a senior author with others, the solo publications are listed
first and after that, in strict alphabetical sequence, those
published with one or more other authors.
10.11 Author names are typed in capitals.
10.12 Titles of journals and of books are written out in
full and are underlined as follows: Transactions of the
Linnean Society of London 5: 171-217, or Biology and
ecology of weeds : 24.
10.13 Titles of books should be given as in Taxonomic
literature , edn 2 by Stafleu & Cowan and names of jour-
nals as in the latest edition of World list of scientific pe-
riodicals.
10.14 Examples of references:
Collective book or Flora
BROWN, N.E. 1909. Asclepiadaceae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora
capensis 6,2: 518-1036. Reeve, London.
CUNNINGHAM, A.B. 1989. Indigenous plant use: balancing human
needs and resources. In B.J. Huntley, Biotic diversity in southern Africa —
concepts and conservation'. 93-106. Oxford University Press, Cape
Town.
Book
DU TOIT, A.L. 1966. Geology of South Africa , 3rd edn, S.M. Haughton
(ed.). Oliver & Boyd, London.
HUTCHINSON, J. 1946. A botanist in southern Africa. Gawthom,
London.
Journal
DAVIS, G. 1988. Description of a proteoid-restioid stand in Mesic
Mountain Fynbos of the southwestern Cape and some aspects of its
ecology. Bothalia 18: 279-287.
STEBBINS, G.L. Jr 1952. Aridity as a stimulus to plant evolution.
American Naturalist 86: 35—44.
SMOOK, L. & GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E. 1985. Poaceae. Memoirs of the
Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 5 1 : 45-70.
In press, in preparation
TAYLOR, H.C. in press. A reconnaissance of the vegetation of Rooiberg
State Forest. Technical Bulletin, Department of Forestry.
VOGEL, J.C. 1 982. The age of the the Kuiseb river silt terrace at Homeb.
Palaeoecology of Africa 15. In press.
WEISSER, P.J., GARLAND, J.F. & DREWS, B.K. in prep. Dune ad-
vancement 1937-1977 and preliminary vegetation succession chrono-
logy at Mlalazi Nature Reserve, Natal, South Africa. Bothalia.
Thesis
KRUGER, F.J. 1974. The physiography and plant communities of the
Jakkalsrivier Catchment. M.Sc. (Forestry) thesis. University of Stel-
lenbosch.
MUNDAY, J. 1980. The genus Monechma Hochst. ( Acanthaceae tribe
Justiciae) in southern Africa. M.Sc. thesis. University of the Wit-
watersrand, Johannesburg.
Miscellaneous paper, report, unpublished article, techni-
cal note, congress proceedings
ANON, no date. Eetbare plante van die Wolkberg. Botanical Research
Unit, Grahamstown. Unpublished.
BAWDEN, M.G. & CARROL, D.M. 1968. The land resources of
Lesotho. Land Resources Study No. 3, Land Resources Division. Direc-
torate of Overseas Surveys, Tolworth.
BOUCHER, C. 1981. Contributions of the Botanical Research Institute.
In A.E.F. Heydom. Proceedings of workshop research in Cape estuaries :
105-107. National Research Institute for Oceanology, CSIR, Stel-
lenbosch.
NATIONAL BUILDING RESEARCH INSTITUTE 1959. Report of the
committee on the protection of building timbers in South Africa against
termites, woodboring beetles and fungi, 2nd edn. CSIR Research Report
No. 169.
1 1 Tables
11.1 Each table should be presented on a separate sheet
and be assigned an Arabic numeral, i.e. the first table men-
tioned in the text is marked ‘Table 1’.
11.2 In the captions of tables the word ‘table’ is written
in capital letters. See recent numbers of Bothalia for the
format required.
1 1 .3 Avoid vertical lines, if at all possible. Tables can often
be reduced in width by interchanging primary horizontal
and vertical heads.
12 Figures
12.1 Figures should be planned to fit, after reduction, into
a width of either 80, 118 or 165 mm, with a maximum
vertical length of 230 mm. Allow space for the caption
in the case of figures that will occupy a whole page.
12.2 Line drawings, including graphs and diagrams,
should be in jet-black Indian ink, preferably on fine Felix
Schoeller parole or similar board, 200 gsm, or tracing film.
Lines should be bold enough and letters/symbols large
enough to stand reduction.
12.3 It is recommended that drawings should be twice the
size of the final reproduction.
12.4 Photographs should be of excellent quality on glossy
paper with clear detail and moderate contrast, and they
should be the same size as required in the journal.
342
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
12.5 Photograph mosaics should be submitted complete,
the component photographs mounted neatly on a white
flexible card base leaving a narrow gap of uniform width
(2 mm) between each print. Note that grouping photo-
graphs of markedly divergent contrast results in poor re-
productions.
12.6 Lettering and numbering on all figures should be
done in letraset, stencilling or a comparable method. If
symbols are to be placed on a dark background it is rec-
ommended that black symbols are used on a small white
disk ± 7 mm in diameter and placed in the lower left
hand corner of the relevant photo.
12.7 If several illustrations are treated as components of
a single composite figure they should be designated by
capital letters.
12.8 Note that the word ‘figure’ should be written out in
full, both in the text and the captions.
12.9 In the text the figure reference is then written as in
the following example: ‘The stamens (Figure 4A, B)
are...’
12.10 In captions, ‘figure’ is written in capital letters.
Magnification of figures should be given for the size as
submitted.
12.11 Scale bars or scale lines should be used on fig-
ures.
12. 12 In figures accompanying taxonomic papers, voucher
specimens should be given in the relevant caption.
12.13 Figures are numbered consecutively with Arabic nu-
merals in the order they are referred to in the text.
These numbers, as well as the author's name and an in-
dication of the top of the figure, must be written in soft
pencil on the back of all figures.
12.14 Captions of figures must not be pasted under the
photograph or drawing.
12.15 Authors should indicate in pencil in the text where
they would like the figures to appear.
12.16 Authors wishing to have the originals of figures
returned must inform the editor in the original covering
letter and must mark each original 'To be returned to
author’ .
12.17 Authors wishing to use illustrations already pub-
lished must obtain written permission before submitting
the manuscript and inform the editor of this fact.
12.18 Captions for figures should be collected together
and typed on a separate sheet headed Captions for fig-
ures.
12.19 It is strongly recommended that taxonomic articles
include dot maps as figures to show the distribution of
taxa. The dots used must be large enough to stand reduc-
tion to 80 mm (recommended size: letraset 5 mm diam-
eter).
12.20 Blank maps are available from the bookshop, NBI
Pretoria.
1 3 Text
13.1 As a rule authors should use the names as listed by
T.H. Arnold & B.C. de Wet (eds) in Memoirs of the
Botanical Sun’ey of South Africa No. 62.
13.2 Names of genera and infrageneric taxa are usually
underlined, with the author citation (where relevant) not
underlined. Exceptions include names of new taxa in the
abstracts, correct names given in the synopsis or in para-
graphs on species excluded from a given supraspecific
group in taxonomic articles, in checklists and in indices,
where the position is reversed, correct names not being
underlined and synonyms underlined.
13.3 Names above generic level are not underlined.
13.4 In articles dealing with taxonomy and closely related
subjects the complete scientific name of a plant (with au-
thor citation) should be given at the first mention in the
text. The generic name should be abbreviated to the initial
thereafter, except where intervening references to other
genera with the same initial could cause confusion.
13.5 In normal text, Latin words are italicized, but in the
synopsis of a species, Latin words such as nom. nud. are
not italicized.
13.6 Names of authors of plant names should agree with
the list published by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew,
entitled. Authors of plant names , edited by R.K. Brummitt
& C.E. Powell (1992).
13.7 Modem authors not included in the list should use
their full name and initials when publishing new plant
names. Other author names not in the list should be in
agreement with the recommendations of the Code.
13.8 Names of authors of publications are written out in
full except in the synonymy in taxonomic articles where
they are treated like names of authors of plant names.
13.9 Names of plant collectors are underlined whenever
they are linked to the number of a specimen. The collec-
tion number is also underlined, e.g. Acocks 14407.
13.10 Surnames beginning with ‘De’, ‘Du’ or ‘Van’ begin
with a capital letter unless preceded by an initial.
13.11 For measurements use only units of the International
System of Units (SI). Cm should not be used, only mm
and/or m.
13.12 The use of ‘±’ is preferred to c. or ca.
13.13 Numbers ‘one’ to ‘nine’ are spelled out in normal
text, and from 10 onwards they are written in Arabic nu-
merals.
13. 14 In descriptions of plants, numerals are used through-
out. Write 2. 0-4.5 (not 2-4.5). When counting members
write 2 or 3 (not 2-3) but 2-A.
13.15 Abbreviations should be used sparingly but con-
sistently. No full stops are placed after abbreviations end-
ing with the last letter of the full word (e.g. edition = edn;
editor = ed.), after units of measure, after compass direc-
tions and after herbarium designations.
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
343
13.16 Apart from multi-access keys, indented keys should
be used with couplets numbered la- lb, 2a-2b, etc. (with-
out full stops thereafter).
13.17 Keys consisting of a single couplet have no number-
ing.
13.18 Manuscripts of keys should be presented as in the
following example:
la Leaves closely arranged on an elongated stem; a sub-
merged aquatic with only the capitula exserted ... lb. E.
setaceum var. pumilum
lb Leaves in basal rosettes; stems suppressed; small marsh
plants, ruderals or rarely aquatics:
2a Annuals, small, fast-growing pioneers, dying when the
habitat dries up; capitula without coarse white setae; re-
ceptacles cylindrical:
3a Anthers white ... 2. E. cinereum
3b Anthers black ... 3. E. nigrum
2b Perennials, more robust plants; capitula sparsely to
densely covered with short setae:
13.19 Herbarium voucher specimens should be referred
to wherever possible, not only in taxonomic articles.
14 Species treatment in taxonomic papers
14.1 The procedure to be followed is illustrated in the
example (17, 17.8), which should be referred to, because
not all steps are described in full detail.
14.2 The correct name (not underlined) is to be followed
by its author citation (underlined) and the full literature
reference, with the name of the publication written out in
full (not underlined).
14.3 Thereafter all literature references, including those of
the synonyms, should only reflect author, page and year
of publication, e.g. C.E. Hubb. in Kew Bulletin 15: 307
(1960); Boris et al 14 (1966); Boris: 89 (1967); Sims: t.
38 (1977); Sims: 67 (1980).
14.4 The description and the discussion should consist of
paragraphs commencing, where possible, with italicized
leader words such as flowering time, diagnostic charac-
ters, distribution and habitat.
14.5 When more than one species of a given genus is
dealt with in a paper, the correct name of each species
should be prefixed by a sequential number followed by a
full stop, the first line of the paragraph to be indented.
Infraspecific taxa are marked with small letters, e.g. lb.,
12c., etc.
14.6 Names of authors are written in the same way (see
13.1, 13.6), irrespective of whether the person in question
is cited as the author of a plant name or of a publication.
14.7 The word ‘figure’ is written as ‘fig.’, and ‘t.’ is used
for both ‘plate’ and ‘tablet’.
14.8 Literature references providing good illustrations of
the species in question may be cited in a paragraph com-
mencing with the word leones followed by a colon. This
paragraph is given after the last paragraph of the synon-
ymy, see 17.9.
1 5 Citation of specimens
15.1 Type specimen in synopsis: the following should be
given (if available): country (if not in RSA), province,
grid reference (at least for new taxa), locality as given by
original collector, modem equivalent of collecting locality
in square brackets (if relevant), quarter-degree square,
date of collection (optional), collector’s name and collect-
ing number (both underlined).
15.2 The abbreviation s.n. ( sine numero) is given after the
name of a collector who usually assigned numbers to his
collections but did not do so in the specimen in question.
The herbaria in which the relevant type(s) are housed are
indicated by means of the abbreviations given in the latest
edition of Index Herbariorum.
15.3 The holotype (holo.) and its location are mentioned
first, followed by a semicolon, the other herbaria are ar-
ranged alphabetically, separated by commas.
15.4 Authors should indicate by means of an exclamation
mark (!) which of the types have been personally exam-
ined.
15.5 If only a photograph or microfiche was seen, write
as follows: Anon. 422 (X, holo. — BOL, photo.!).
15.6 Lectotypes or neotypes should be chosen for correct
names without a holotype. It is not necessary to lectotypify
synonyms.
15.7 When a lectotype or a neotype are newly chosen this
should be indicated by using the phrase ‘here designated’.
If reference is made to a previously selected lectotype or
neotype, the name of the designating author and the lit-
erature reference should be given. In cases where no type
was cited, and none has subsequently been nominated,
this may be stated as ‘not designated’.
15.8 In brief papers mentioning only a few species and
a few cited specimens the specimens should be arranged
according to the grid reference system: Provinces/coun-
tries (typed in capitals) should be cited in the following
order: SWA/Namibia, Botswana, Transvaal, Orange Free
State, Swaziland, Natal, Lesotho, Transkei and Cape.
15.9 Grid references should be cited in numerical se-
quence.
15.10 Locality records for specimens should preferably be
given to within a quarter-degree square. Records from the
same one-degree square are given in alphabetical order,
i.e (-AC) precedes (-AD), etc. Records from the same
quarter-degree square are arranged alphabetically accord-
ing to the collectors’ names; the quarter-degree references
must be repeated for each specimen cited.
15.11 The relevant international code of the herbaria in
which a collection was seen should be given in brackets
after the collection number; the codes are separated by
commas. The following example will explain the proce-
dure:
344
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
NATAL. — 2731 (Louwsburg): 16 kmE of Nongoma, (-DD ), Pelser 354
(BM, K, PRE); near Dwarsrand, Van der Merwe 4789 (BOL, M). 2829
(Harrismith): near Groothoek, (-AB), Smith 234\ Koffiefontein, (-AB),
Taylor 720 (PRE); Cathedral Peak Forest Station, (-CC), Marriot 74
(KMG); Wilgerfontein, Roux 426. Grid ref. unknown: Sterkstroom,
Strydom 12 (NBG).
15.12 For records from outside southern Africa authors
should use degree squares without names, e.g.:
KENYA. — 0136: Nairobi plains beyond race course, Napier 485.
15.13 Monographs and revisions: in the case of all major
works of this nature it is assumed that the author has in-
vestigated the relevant material in all major herbaria and
that he has provided the specimens seen with determinavit
labels. It is assumed further that the author has submitted
distribution maps for all relevant taxa and that the distri-
bution has been described briefly in words in the text.
Under the heading ‘Vouchers’ no more than five speci-
mens should be cited, indicating merely the collector and
the collector’s number (both underlined). Specimens are
alphabetically arranged according to collector’s name. If
more than one specimen by the same collector is cited,
they are arranged numerically and separated by a comma.
The purpose of the cited specimens is not to indicate dis-
tribution but to convey the author’s concept of the taxon
in question.
15.14 The herbaria in which the specimens are housed
are indicated by means of the abbreviation given in the
latest edition of Index Herbariorum . They are given be-
tween brackets, arranged alphabetically and separated by
commas behind every specimen as in the following ex-
ample:
Vouchers: Fisher 840 (NH, NU, PRE); Flanagan 831 (GRA, PRE), 840
(NH, PRE); Marloth 4926 (PRE, STE); Schelpe 6161. 6163. 6405 (BOL);
Schlechter 4451 (BM, BOL, GRA, K, PRE).
15.15 If long lists of specimens are given, they must be
listed together before Acknowledgements under the
heading Specimens examined. They are arranged alpha-
betically by the collector’s name and then numerically for
each collector. The species is indicated in brackets by the
number that was assigned to it in the text and any infra-
specific taxa by a small letter. If more than one genus is
dealt with in a given article, the first species of the first
genus mentioned is indicated as 1.1. This is followed by
the international herbarium designation. Note that the
name of the collector and the collection number are un-
derlined:
Acocks 12497(2. lb) BM, K, PRE; 14724 (1. 13a) BOL, K, P. Archer 1507
(1.4) BM, G. Burchell 2847 (2.8c) MB, K. Barman 2401 (3.3) MO, S.
Bunt 789 (2.6) B, KMG, STE.
1 6 Synonyms
16. 1 In a monograph or a revision covering all of southern
Africa, all synonyms based on types of southern African
origin, or used in southern African literature, should be
included.
16.2 Illegitimate names are designated by nom. illeg. after
the reference, followed by non with the author and date,
if there is an earlier homonym.
16.3 Nomina nuda ( nom. nud.) and invalidly published
names are excluded unless there is a special reason to cite
them, for example if they have been used in prominent
publications.
16.4 In normal text Latin words are italicized, but in the
synopsis of a species Latin words such as nom. nud. are
not italicized.
16.5 Synonyms should be arranged chronologically into
groups of nomenclatural synonyms, i.e. synonyms based
on the same type, and the groups should be arranged chro-
nologically by basionyms, except for the basionym of the
correct name which is dealt with in the paragraph directly
after that of the correct name.
16.6 When a generic name is repeated in a given synon-
ymy it should be abbreviated to the initial except where
intervening references to other genera with the same initial
could cause confusion.
1 7 Description and example of species treatment
17.1 Descriptions of all taxa of higher plants should,
where possible, follow the sequence: Habit; sexuality; un-
derground parts (if relevant). Indumentum (if it can be
easily described for the whole plant). Stems/branches.
Bark. Leaves : arrangement, petiole absent/present, pubes-
cence; blade: shape, size, apex, base, margin; midrib:
above/below, texture, colour; petiole; stipules. Inflores-
cence.: type, shape, position; bracts/bracteoles. Flowers :
shape, sex. Receptacle. Calyx. Corolla. Disc. Androecium.
Gynoecium. Fruit. Seeds. Chromosome number. Figure
(word written out in full) number.
17.2 As a rule shape should be given before measure-
ments.
17.3 In general, if an organ has more than one of the parts
being described, use the plural, otherwise use the singular,
for example, petals of a flower but blade of a leaf.
17.4 Language must be as concise as possible, using par-
ticiples instead of verbs.
17.5 Dimension ranges should be cited as in 17.9.
17.6 Care must be exercised in the use of dashes and
hyphens: a hyphen is a short stroke joining two syllables
of a word, e.g. ovate-lanceolate or sea-green, with no
space between the letter and the stroke; an N-dash ( en )
is a longer stroke commonly used instead of the word ‘to’
between numerals, ‘2-5 mm long’ (do not use it between
words but rather use the word ‘to’, e.g. ‘ovate to lan-
ceolate’); it is produced by typing 3 hyphens next to each
other; and an M-dash ( em ) is a stroke longer than an N-
dash and is used variously, e.g. in front of a subspecific
epithet in stead of the full species name; it is produced
by typing 2 hyphens next to one another.
17.7 The use of ‘±’ is preferred to c. or ca when describing
shape, measurements, dimensions, etc.
17.8 The decimal point replaces the comma in all units
of measurement, e.g. leaves 1.0-1 .5 mm long.
17.9 Example:
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
345
1. Bequaertiodendron magalismontanum (Sond.) Heine &
Hemsl. in Kew Bulletin: 307 (1960); Codd: 72(1964); Elsdon: 75 ( 1980).
Type: Transvaal, Magaliesberg, Zeyher 1849 (S, holo.-BOL, photo.!).
Chrysophyllum magalismontanum Sond.: 721 (1850); Harv.: 812
(1867); Engl.: 434 (1904); Bottmar: 34 (1919). Zeyherella mag-
alismontanum (Sond.) Aubrev. & Pelegr.: 105 (1958); Justin: (1973).
Chrysophyllum argyrophyllum Hiem: 721 (1850); Engl.: 43 (1904).
Boivinella argyrophylla (Hiem) Aubrev. & Pellegr.: 37 (1958); Justin: 98
(1973). Types: Angola, Welwitsch 4828 (BM!, lecto., here designated;
PRE1); Angola, Welwitsch 4872 (BM!).
Chrysophyllum wilmsii Engl.: 4, t. 16 (1904); Masonet: 77 (1923);
Woodson: 244 (1937). Boivinella wilmsii (Engl.) Aubrev. & Pellegr.: 39
(1958); Justin: 99 (1973). Type: Transvaal, Magoebaskloof, Wilms 1812
(B, holo.; K!, P!, lecto., designated by Aubrev. & Pellegr.: 38 (1958),
PRE!,S!,W!,Z!).
Bequaertiodendron fruticosa De Wild.: 37 (1923), non Bonpland:
590 (1823); Bakker: 167 (1929); Fries: 302 (1938); Davy: 640 (1954);
Breytenbach: 117 ( 1959); Clausen: 720 (1968); Pelmer: 34(1969). Type:
Transvaal, Tzaneen Dist., Granville 3665 (K, holo.!; G!, P!, PRE!, S!).
Bequaertiodendron fragrans auct. non Oldemann: Glover: 149, t. 19
(1915); Henkel: 226(1934); Stapelton: 6 ( 1954).
leones: Harv.: 812 (1867); Henkel: t. 84 (1934?; Codd: 73 (1964);
Palmer: 35 (1969).
Woody perennial; main branches up to 0.4 m long, erect
or decumbent, grey woolly-felted, leafy. Leaves linear to
oblanceolate, 3-10(-23) x 1.0-1.5(-4.0) mm, obtuse,
base broad, half-clasping. Heads heterogamous, campan-
ulate, 7-8 x 5 mm, solitary, sessile at tip of axillary shoots;
involucral bracts in 5 or 6 series, inner exceeding flowers,
tips subopaque, white, very acute. Receptacle nearly
smooth. Flowers ± 23-30, 7-11 male, 16-21 bisexual,
yellow, tipped pink. Achenes ± 0.75 mm long,, elliptic.
Pappus bristles very many, equalling corolla, scabridu-
lous. Chromosome number. 2n = 22. Figure 23B.
18 New taxa
18.1 The name of a new taxon must be accompanied by
at least a Latin diagnosis. Authors should not provide full-
length Latin descriptions unless they have the required
expertise in Latin at their disposal.
18.2 It is recommended that descriptions of new taxa be
accompanied by a good illustration (line drawing or pho-
tograph) and a distribution map.
18.3 Example:
109. Helichrysum jubilatum Hilliard , sp. nov. H.
alsinoidei DC. affinis, sed foliis ellipticis (nec spatulatis),
inflorescentiis compositis a foliis non circumcinctis, flori-
bus femineis numero quasi dimidium hermaphroditorium
aequantibus (nec capitulis homogamis vel floribus
femineis 1-3 tantum) distinguitur.
Herba annua e basi ramosa; caules erecti vel decum-
bentes, 100-250 mm longi, tenuiter albo-lanati, remote
foliati. Folia plemmque 8-30 x 5-15 mm, sub capitulis
minora, elliptica vel oblanceolata, obtusa vel acuta,
mucronata, basi semi-amplexicauli, utrinque cano-lanato-
arachnoidea. Capitula heterogama, campanulata, 3. 5-4.0
x 2.5 mm, pro parte maxima in paniculas cymosas ter-
minales aggregata; capitula subterminalia interdum solita-
ria vel 2-3 ad apices ramulorum nudorum ad 30 mm
longorum. Bracteae involucrales 5-seriatae, gradatae, ex-
teriores pellucidae, pallide stramineae, dorso lanatae,
seriebus duabus interioribus subaequalibus et flores quasi
aequantibus, apicibus obtusis opacis niveis vix radianti-
bus. Receptaculum fere laeve. Flores ± 35-41. Achenia
0.75 mm longa, pilis myxogenis praedita. Pappi setae
multae, corollam aequantes, apicibus scabridis, basibus
non cohaerentibus.
TYPE. — Cape, 28 17 (Vioolsdrif): Richtersveld, (-CC),
± 5 miles E of Lekkersing on road to Stinkfontein, kloof
in hill south of road, annual, disc whitish, 7-11-1962,
Nordenstam 1823 (S, holo.; E, NH, PRE).
1 9 Proofs
Only page proofs are normally sent to authors. They
should be corrected in red ink and be returned to the editor
as soon as possible.
20 Reprints
Authors receive 100 reprints free. If there is more than
one author, this number will have to be shared between
them.
21 Documents consulted
Guides to authors of the following publications were
made use of in the compilation of the present guide: Annals
of the Missouri Botanic Garden, Botanical Journal of the
Linnean Society, Flora of Australia, Smithsonian Con-
tributions to Botany, South African Journal of Botany
(including instructions to authors of taxonomic papers).
South African Journal of Science.
22 Address of editor
Manuscripts should be submitted to: The Editor,
Bothalia , National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101,
Pretoria 0001.
INDEX
abbreviation, 13.4, 13.5, 13.12, 13.15, 14.7, 15.2, 15.14, 16.2, 16.3, 16.4,
16.6
abstract (uittreksel), 3.2, 7, 13.2
acknowledgements, 9
address of
authors, 3.3, 4
editor, 22
alphabetical, 6, 10.3, 10.9, 10.10, 15.3, 15.10, 15.13, 15.14, 15.15
Arabic numerals, 11.1, 12.13, 13.3
ARNOLD, T.H. & DE WET, B.C. (eds) 1993. Plants of southern Africa:
names and distribution. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South
Africa No. 62, 13.1
ASCII, 2.1
author(s), 1,3.1, 4, 10.14, 12.15
address, 3.3, 4
citation, 5, 7.3, 13.2, 13.4, 14.2
first, 10.2
names, 3.3, 10.3, 10.7, 10.9, 10.11, 12.13, 13.7, 13.8, 14.3, 14.6, 15.7,
16.2
names of plant names, 13.6, 13.7, 13.8
senior, 10.10
book reviews, 1, 3.4
346
Bothalia 23,2 (1993)
books, 10.4, 10.12, 10.13, 10.14
Bothalia, 1, 3.2, 11.2, 22
brief taxonomic articles, 15. B
BRUMMITT, R.K. & POWELL, C.E. (eds) 1992. Authors of plant
names. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 13.6
c„ 13.2, 17.7
ca, 13.2, 17.7
capitals, 11.2, 12.7, 12.10, 14.2, 15.8
captions, 3.1, 3.4, 3.5, 1 1.2, 12.8, 12.10, 12.12, 12.14, 12.18
checklist, 13.2
chromosome number, 17.1, 17.9
chronological sequence, 10.6, 10.9, 16.5
citation
author, 5, 7.3, 13.2, 13.4, 14.2
literature, 10.3
of specimens, 15
cm, 13.1 1
collection
date, 15.1
number, 13.9, 15.1, 15.2, 15.11, 15.13, 15.15
collective book, 10.15
collector, 13.9,15.1, 15.2, 15.10, 15.13, 15.15 colon, 2.13
comma, 2.13, 15.13
compass directions, 13.15
composite figure, 12.7
congress proceedings, 10.14
contents, 8
correspondence, 4
countries, 6.7, 15.8
decimal point, 17.8
description and example of species treatment, 17
diagrams, 12.2
discussion, 3.4, 14.4
diskette, 1, 2, 2.4
distribution maps, 12.19, 12.20, 15.13, 18.2
documents consulted, 21
dot maps, 12.19, 12.20, 15.13, 18.2
double
line spacing, 2.4
space, 3.1, 2.13
drawing paper, 12.2
drawings, 12.2
edition, 13.15
editor, 13. 15, 22
editorial
board, 1
policy, 1
etal., 10.2, 14.3
example of
new taxa, 18.3
species treatment, 17.9
exclamation mark, 2.13, 15.4
family name, 5, 6.7
fig., 14.7
ftgure(s), 12, 14.7, 17.1
reduction of, 12.1, 12.2, 12.19
returned, 12.16
first author, 10.2
flora, 1, 10.14
footnote, 3.3
full stop, 2.13, 13.15, 13.16, 14.5
genera, 13.2
generic name, 13.3, 13.4, 16.6
geographical area, 7.2
granting agencies, 3.3
graphs, 12.2
grid reference system, 15.1, 15.8, 15.9, 15.11
headings, 2.7, 2.9
sequence of, 3.3, 3.4
herbaria, 15.2, 15.3, 15.11, 15.13, 15.14
herbarium
code, 15.11
designations, 13.15, 15.15
voucher specimens, 12.12, 13.19
holo., 15.5, 17.9, 18.3
holotype, 15.3, 15.6
homonym, 16.2
hyphenated words, 2.6
hyphen, 2.10-2.12, 17.6
IBM compatible, 2.1
icones, 10.2, 17.9
illegitimate names (nom. illeg.), 16.2
illustrations, 12.3, 12.7, 12.17, 14.8
previously published, 12.17
Index Herbariorum, 15.2, 15.14
index of names, 3.4
infrageneric taxa, 13.2
initials, 9, 10.5, 13.7
in prep., 10. 14
in preparation, 10.14
in press, 10.14
International
Code of Botanical Nomenclature, 13.7
System of Units (SI), 1 3. 1 1
invalidly published names, 16.3
italics/underlining, 7.4, 10.12, 13.2, 13.3, 13.5, 13.9, 14.2, 15.1, 15.13,
15.15
journals, 10.4, 10.12, 10.14
names of, 10.1, 10.13
justify, 2.5
keys, 2.7, 2.16, 13.16, 13.17, 13.18
keywords, 3.3, 3.4, 6
Latin, 13.5, 15.2, 16.2, 16.3, 16.4
descriptions, 18.1
layout, 3.2
lecto., 15.6, 15.7, 17.9
lectotype, 15.6, 15.7, 17.9
letraset, 12.6, 12.19
lettering, 12.6
line
drawings, 12.2, 18.2
spacing, 2.4, 2.9
literature
citations, 14.4
references, 3.1, 10, 10.7
within synonymy, 10.7, 14.8
localities outside southern Africa, 15.12
locality, 15.1, 15.10
m, 13.11
magnification of figures, 12.3, 12.10
manuscript
language, 1
requirements, 3
map, distribution, dot, 12.19, 12.20, 15.13, 18.2
M-dash, 2.12, 17.6
mm, 13.1 1
margin, 2.7, 2.16, 3.1, 17.1
material, 3.3, 3.4
measurements, 13.11, 17.2, 17.7, 17.8
methods, 3.4, 6. 10.3
microfiche, 15.5
miscellaneous paper, 10.14
monograph, 3.4, 15.13, 16.1
MSWord 5.5, 2.1, 2.8
name
collector’s, 15.10
illegitimate, 16.2
invalidly published, 16.3
name(s)
ofauthor(s), 3.3, 10.7, 10.9, 10.11, 13.7, 13.8, 14.6
of plant names, 5, 13.1, 13.2, 13.6, 14.6
of publications, 13.8
plant collectors, 13.9
publication, 14.2
taxa, 2.16,5,7.4, 10.8, 13.2, 13.3
N-dash, 2.11, 17.6
neotype, 15.6, 15.7
new
combinations, 7.4
taxa, 7.4, 13.2, 13.7, 15.7, 18
nom. illeg., 16.2
nom. nud., 13.5, 16.3, 16.4
notes, 1, 3.4, 10.14
technical, 10. 14
number
chromosome, 17.1, 17.9
page, 2.2
numbering, 13.13
figures, 12.6, 12.13, 17.1
keys, 13.16, 13.17
Bothalia 23,2(1993)
347
pages, 3.5, 1 3.4
taxa, 2.16, 7.2, 13.4, 14.5, 15.15
numerals, Arabic, 11.1, 12.13, 13.3
PC diskettes, 1, 2
pers. comm., 10.5
personal communications (pers. comm.), 10.5, 10.8
photocopies, 3.1
photograph, 12.4, 12.14, 15.5, 18.2
mosaic, 12.5
plant name, 5, 13.4, 13.6, 13.7, 13.8, 14.6
plate (t.), 14.7
prepositions, 6.4
proceedings, 10.14
proofs, 19
provinces, 6.7, 15.1, 15.8
publications, 10.8, 13.8, 14.3
name of, 14.2
solo, 10. 10
year of, 10.9, 14.3
quarter-degree squares, 15.1, 15.10
quotes, 2. 1 5
reduction of figures, 12.1, 12.2, 12.19
referees, 1
reference, 3.4, 10.6, 10.7, 10.9, 10.14
figure, 12.9
grid, 15.1, 15.8, 15.9, 15.11
list, 10.5, 10.8, 10.9
literature, 3.1, 10, 10.7
report, 10.14
reprints, 20
requirements for
diskette, 2
manuscript, 3
results, 3.4
revision, 3.4, 8, 15.13, 16.1
scale bar, 12.1 1
semicolon, 2.13, 10.3, 15.3, 15.13
senior author, 10.10
sequence of headings, 3.3, 3.4
short notes, 1, 3.4
single line spacing, 2.4
species treatment in taxonomic papers, 14
specimens examined, 3.4, 15.5
STAFLEU, F.A. & COWAN, R.S. 1976-1988. Taxonomic literature.
Vols 1-7, 10.13
stiffies, 1, 2
surnames, 13.10
symbols, 12.6
synopsis, 13.2, 13.5, 15.1, 16.4
synonymy, 10.7, 13.8, 14.4, 14.8, 16.6
t„ 14.3, 14.7, 17.9
table, 2.3, 3.1, 3.4, 3.5, 11
of contents, 8
tablet (t.), 14.7
taxa
name of, 2.16,5,7.4, 10.8, 13.2, 13.3
new, 7.4, 13.2, 13.7, 15.7, 18
numbering of, 2.16, 7.2, 13.4, 14.5, 15.15
taxonomic
articles/papers, 7.2, 10.8, 12.12, 12.19, 13.2, 13.8, 14
revision, 8
taxonomy, 5, 7.3, 13.4, 15.8
technical note, 10.15
text, 3.1, 10, 10.1, 10.4, 10.5, 10.8, 11.1, 12.8, 12.9, 12.13, 12.15, 13,
15.13, 15.15, 16.4
thesis, 10.15
times sign, 2.14
title, 3.3, 5, 6.9, 6.11
of books, 10.4, 10.12, 10.13, 10.14
of journals, 10.4, 10.12, 10.13, 10.14
page, 1, 3.3, 3.5
type, 15.2, 15.4, 15.7, 16.1, 16.6, 17.9
here designated, 15.7, 17.9
not designated, 15.7
specimen, 15.1
underlining/italics, 7.4, 10.12, 13.2, 13.3, 13.5, 13.9, 14.2, 15.1, 15.13,
15.15
uittreksel (abstract), 7.1
units of measure, 13.11, 13.15
unpublished article, 10.14
vouchers, 15.13, 15. 14
voucher specimens, 12.12, 13.19
World list of scientific periodicals, 10.13
year of publication, 10.9, 14.3
BOTHALIA
Volume 23,2
Oct./Okt. 1993
CONTENTS-INHOUD
1 . Synopsis of the genus Brachylaena (Asteraceae) in southern Africa. S.S. CILLIERS 175
2. Nomenclatural changes and additions to the genus Ophioglossum in Afrita (Ophioglossaceae:
Pteridophyta). J. E. BURROWS and T. J. EDWARDS 185
3. Systematic studies in the genus Mohria (Anemiaceae: Pteridophyta). IV. Comparative gametophyte
morphology in Mohria and Anemia. J.P. ROUX 191
4. Synopsis of the genus Disparago (Asteraceae). M. KOEKEMOER 197
5. Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from southern Africa. 2. The genus Athalamia and A. spathysii;
the genus Oxymitra and O. cristata. S.M. PEROLD 207
6. Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from southern Africa. 3. The genus Targionia and T. hypophylla
with notes on T. lorbeeriana and Cyathodium foetidissimum (Targioniaceae). S.M. PEROLD .... 215
7. The hepatic, Jensenia spinosa (= Pallavicinia stephanii: Pallaviciniaceae), in southern Africa. S.M.
PEROLD 223
8. Notes on African plants:
Asclepiadaceae. Validation of the combination Aspidonepsis reenensis (Asclepiadaceae): the type
species of the subgenus Unguilobium. A. NICHOLAS and D.J. GOYDER 236
Curcurbitaceae. A new species of Kedrostis from the western Cape. P. BRUYNS 233
Sapotaceae. A ‘ Bequaertiodendron by any other name? C.L. BREDENKAMP and G.F. SMITH. 235
Vitaceae. A new species of Rhoicissus from the Transvaal. E. RETIEF 231
9. The vegetation of the southern Langeberg, Cape Province. 3. The plant communities of the Bergfontein,
Rooiwaterspruit and Phesantefontein areas. D.J. MCDONALD 239
Errata in Bothalia 23,2: 157: The vegetation of the southern Langeberg, Cape Province. 2. The plant
communities of the Marloth Nature Reserve, by D.J. McDonald 263
1 0. The efficient use of small plots in a fynbos phytosociological study in the northern Cederberg: a quick way
to collect plant-environmental data. P.J. MUSTART, E.J. MOLL and H.C. TAYLOR 265
1 1 . The vegetation ecology of municipal Durban, Natal. Floristic classification. D.C. ROBERTS 271
12. National Botanical Institute, South Africa: list of staff and publications 327
1 3. Guide for authors to Bothalia 339
Abstracted, indexed or listed in AGRICOLA. Biological Abstracts, Current Advances in Plant Science, Current Contents, Field Crop Abstracts,
Forestry Abstracts, Herbage Abstracts, Excerpta Botanica, Revue of Plant Pathology, Revue of Medical and Veterinary Mycology and The Kew
Record of Taxonomic Literature. /Opgesom, in indeks opgeneem of gelys in AGRICOLA. Biological Abstracts, Current Advances in Plant Science,
Current Contents, Field Crop Abstracts, Forestry Abstracts, Herbage Abstracts, Excerpta Botanica, Revue of Plant Pathology, Revue of Medical and
Veterinary Mycology en The Kew Record of Taxonomic Literature.
ISSN 0006 8241
©and published by/pbtainable from the National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001, South Africa. Typesetting: S.S. Brink (NBI).
Reproduction and printing by Aurora Printers, P.O. Box 422, Pretoria 0001. Tel. (012) 327-5073./Gepubliseer deur/verkrygbaar van die Nasionale
Botaniese Instituut, Privaatsak X 101 , Pretoria 0001, Suid-Afrika. Kopieset: S.S. Brink (NBI). Reproduksie en drukwerk deur Aurora Drukkers, Posbus
422, Pretoria 0001. Tel. (012) 327-5073.