ISSN 0006 8241 = Bothalia
Bothalia
’N TYDSKRIF VIR PLANTKUNDIGE NAVORSING
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Vol. 24,1
May/Mei 1994
TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE NATIONAL BOTANICAL INSTITUTE, PRETORIA
TEGNIESE PUBLIKASIES VAN DIE NASIONALE BOTANIESE INSTITUUT, PRETORIA
Obtainable from the National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101,
Pretoria 0001, Republic of South Africa. A catalogue of all available
publications will be issued on request.
BOTHALIA
Bothalia is named in honour of General Louis Botha, first Premier and
Mi nister of Agriculture of the Union of South Africa. This house journal
of the National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, is devoted to the furtherance
of botanical science. The main fields covered are taxonomy, ecology,
anatomy and cytology. Two parts of the journal and an index to contents,
authors and subjects are published annually.
A booklet of the contents to Vols 1-20 is available.
Verkrygbaar van die Nasionale Botaniese Instituut, Privaatsak XI 01,
Pretoria 000 1 , Republiek van Suid-Afrika. 'n Katalogus van alle beskik-
bare publikasies kan aangevra word.
Bothalia is vemoem ter ere van Generaal Louis Botha, eerste Eerste Minister
en Minister van Landbou van die Unie van Suid-Afrika. Hierdie lyfblad van
die Nasionale Botaniese Instituut, Pretoria, is gewy aan die bevordering van
die wetenskap van plantkunde. Die hoofgebiede wat gedek word, is
taksonomie, ekologie, anatomie en sitologie. Twee dele van die tydskrif en
’n indeks van die inhoud, outeurs en onderwerpe verskyn jaarliks.
’n Inhoudsopgawe tot volumes 1-20 is beskikbaar.
MEMOIRS OF THE BOTANICAL SURVEY OF SOUTH AFRICA
The memoirs are individual treatises usually of an ecological nature, but
sometimes dealing with taxonomy or economic botany.
THE FLOWERING PLANTS OF AFRICA (FPA)
This serial presents colour plates of African plants with accompanying
text. The plates are prepared mainly by the artists at the National
Botanical Institute. Many well known botanical artists have contributed
to the series, such as Cythna Letty (over 700 plates), Kathleen Lansdell,
Stella Gower, Betty Connell, Peter Bally and Fay Anderson. The Editor
is pleased to receive living plants of general interest or of economic value
for illustration.
Twenty plates are published annually.
An index to Vols 1-49 is available.
FLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA (FSA)
A taxonomic treatise on the flora of the Republic of South Africa,
Ciskei, Transkei, Lesotho, Swaziland, Bophuthatswana, Namibia,
Botswana and Venda. The FSA contains descriptions of families, genera,
species, infraspecific taxa, keys to genera and species, synonymy, liter-
ature and limited specimen citations, as well as taxonomic and ecological
notes.
Contributions to the FSA will also appear in Bothalia.
PALAEOFLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA
A palaeoflora on a pattern comparable to that of the Flora of
southern Africa. Much of the information is presented in the form
of tables and photographic plates depicting fossil populations. Now
available:
'n Reeks van losstaande omvattende verhandelings oor vernaamlik eko-
logiese, maar soms ook taksonomiese of plantekonomiese onderwerpe.
Hierdie reeks bied kleurplate van Afrikaanse plante met bygaande teks.
Die skilderye word meestal deur die kunstenaars van die Nasionale
Botaniese Instituut voorberei. Talle bekende botaniese kunstenaars het
tot die reeks bygedra, soos Cythna Letty (meer as 700 plate), Kathleen
Lansdell, Stella Gower, Betty Connell. Peter Bally en Fay Anderson. Die
Redakteur verwelkom lewende plante van algemene belang of ekono-
miese waarde vir afbeelding.
Twintig plate word jaarliks gepubliseer.
’n Indeks tot volumes 1—49 is beskikbaar.
’n Taksonomiese verhandeling oor the flora van die Republiek van Suid-
Afrika, Ciskei, Transkei, Lesotho, Swaziland, Bophuthatswana, Namibie,
Botswana en Venda. Die FSA bevat beskrywings van families, genusse,
spesies, infraspesifteke taksons, sleutels tot genusse en spesies, sinonimie,
literatuur, verwysings na enkele eksemplare, asook beknopte taksonomiese
en ekologiese aantekeninge.
Bydraes tot die FSA sal ook in Bothalia verskyn.
’n Palaeoflora met ’n uitleg vergelykbaar met die van die Flora van
suidelike Afrika. Baie van die inligting word aangebied in die vorm van
tabelle en fotografiese plate waarop fossiele populasies afgebeeld word.
Reeds beskikbaar:
Molteno Formation (Triassic) Vol. 1 . Introduction. Dicroidium, by/deur J.M. & H.M. Anderson.
Molteno Formation (Triassic) Vol. 2. Gymnosperms (excluding Dicroidium ), by/deur J.M. & H.M. Anderson.
Prodromus of South African Megafloras. Devonian to Lower Cretaceous, by/deur J.M. & H.M. Anderson. Obtain-
able from/Beskikbaar van: A. A. Balkema Marketing, Box/Posbus 317, Claremont 7735, RSA.
ANNALS OF KIRSTENBOSCH BOTANIC GARDENS
A series devoted to the publication of monographs and major works
on southern African flora. Published: Vol. 14-19 (earlier volumes
published as Supplementary volumes to the Journal of South African
Botany )
-n Reeks gewy aan die publikasie van monografiee en belangrike werke oor
flora van suidelike Afrika. Gepubliseer: vol. 14-19 (vroeere volumes
gepubliseer as Supplementary volumes van die Journal of South African
Botany).
BOTHALIA
’N TYDSKRIF VIR PLANTKUNDIGE NAVORSING
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Volume 24,1
Scientific Editor/Wetenskaplike Redakteur: O.A. Leistner
Technical Editor/Tegniese Redakteur: B.A. Momberg
NATIONAL
Botanical
INSTITUTE
NASIONALE BOTANIESE
INSTITUUT 3
Private Bag X 101 PRETORIA 0001
1994 -05- 0'
Prlvaatsak X 101 PRETORIA 0001
NATIONAL BOTANICAL
INSTITUTE
2 Cussonia Avenue, Brummeria, Pretoria
Private Bag XI01, Pretoria 0001
ISSN 0006 8241
May/Mei 1994
Editorial Board/Redaksieraad
D.F. Cutler
B.J. Huntley
P.H. Raven
J.P. Rourke
M.J. Werger
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK
National Botanical Institute, Cape Town, RSA
Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, USA
Compton Herbarium, NBI, Cape Town, RSA
University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
CONTENTS— INHOUD
Volume 24,1
1. Three new species of Serruria (Proteaceae) from the southwestern Cape. J.P. ROURKE 1
2. Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from southern Africa. 4. Mannia capensis, section and subgenus
Xeromannia (Aytoniaceae). S.M. PEROLD 9
3. Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from southern Africa. 5. The genus Exormotheca, E. pustulosa
and E. holstii. S.M. PEROLD 15
4. Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae). XIV. Notes on the genus Erica. E.G.H. OLIVER and INGE M.
OLIVER 25
5. Notes on African plants:
Asphodelaceae/Aloaceae. Was Gasteria nitida var. armstrongii validly published? G.F. SMITH,
B-E. VAN WYK & E.J. VAN JAARSVELD 34
Asphodelaceae/Aloaceae. Aloe barberae to replace A. bainesii. G.F. SMITH, B-E. VAN WYK &
H.F. GLEN 34
Boraginaceae. The correct author citation for Lobostemon montanus. M.H. BUYS and J.J.A. VAN
DER WALT 35
Rosaceae. Cliffortia longifolia, a 'good' species or should it be a variety under C. strobiliferal . A.C.
FELLINGHAM.V 31
6. Ferns and flowering plants of Klaserie Private Nature Reserve, eastern Transvaal: an annotated checklist.
N. ZAMBATIS 37
7. External fruit morphology of southern African Arundineae (Arundinoideae: Poaceae). N.P BARKER . 55
8. Names of the southern African species of Rhus (Anacardiaceae) and their etymology. R.O. MOFFETT . 67
9. Flowering phenology in the arid winter rainfall region of southern Africa. M. STRUCK 77
10. Miscellaneous notes:
Chromosome counts for seven species of Cineraria (Senecioneae, Asteraceae). G.V. CRON, B-E.
VAN WYK and P.L.D. VINCENT 91
Acytotaxonomic study of some representatives of the tribe Cynodonteae (Chloridoideae, Poaceae).
A. STRYDOM and J.J. SPIES 92
Systematic studies in the genus Mohria (Anemiaceae). V. Karyology (Pteridophyta). J.P. ROUX . 97
1 1. Embryo sac development in some representatives of the tribe Cynodonteae (Poaceae). A. STRYDOM and
J.J. SPIES 101
12. Breeding systems in some representatives of the genus Lycium (Solanaceae). L. MINNE, J.J. SPIES, H.J.T.
VENTER and A.M. VENTER 107
13. A life dedicated to lichens and literature, Ove Almbom (30-07-1914— 06-03-1992). E.I. KARNEFELT . Ill
14. Book reviews 117
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2016
https://archive.org/details/bothaliavolume2424unse
Bothalia 24,1: 1-7(1994)
Three new species of Serruria (Proteaceae) from the southwestern Cape
J.P. ROURKE*
Keywords: new species, Proteaceae, Serruria, southwestern Cape
ABSTRACT
Three new species of Serruria are described, namely, S. altiscapa Rourke from the Villiersdorp and Hottentots Holland
Mountains, characterised by its unusually tall paniculate inflorescences; S. gremialis Rourke, a multistemmed lignotuberous
species with adaxially cygneous, basally pubescent styles and cyiindric pollen presenters from the Villiersdorp and Houhoek
Mountains as well as the north slopes of the Riviersonderend Range, and S. balauocephala Rourke, a single-stemmed re-seeding
species from the north slopes of the Langeberg, distinguished by its adaxially cygneous, basally pubescent styles and conic-acute
pollen presenters.
UITTREKSEL
Drie nuwe Serruria- spesies word beskryf, naamlik S. altiscapa Rourke van die Villiersdorp- en Hottentots-Hollandberge,
gekenmerk deur buitengewoon lang, pluimvormige bloeiwyses; S. gremialis Rourke, 'n veelstammige spesie met verhoute
knolle, adaksiaal swaannekvormige, basaal sagharige style en silindriese stuifmeelaanbieders, van die Villiersdorp- en
Houhoekberge en die noordelike hange van die Riviersonderendreeks, en S. balauocephala Rourke, ’n enkelstammige
hersaaiende spesie van die noordelike hange van die Langeberg, gekenmerk deur adaksiaal swaannekvormige, basaal
saagharige style en konies-skerppuntige stuifmeelaanbieders.
INTRODUCTION
Serruria Salisb., is the largest genus of the South Afri-
can Proteaceae which is endemic to the southwestern and
southern Cape. The most recent comprehensive account
of the genus recognised 48 species and listed a further 1 8
as ‘imperfectly known species’ (Phillips & Hutchinson
1912). Exploration of mountainous areas of the Cape dur-
ing the present century has brought a number of new taxa
to light, several of which have already been described
(Rourke 1982, 1990, 1991). This paper enumerates an-
other three new species of Serruria prior to the preparation
of a complete account of the genus.
Serruria altiscapa Rourke , sp. nov., a 5. williamsii
Rourke habitu humili compacto, inflorescentiis pani-
culatis peraltis 700-1 200 mm, bracteis glabris transverso-
ovatis manifeste alatis, perianthioque proximaliter
utriculoso differt.
Frutex compactus, rotundatus, 200-300 mm altus,
monocaulis. Folia 130-230 x 65-140 mm, glabra,
tripinnatifida; petioli 60-75 mm longi, pulvinis pro-
minentibus; foliola 2 mm lata, canaliculata, apices obtusi.
Inflorescentia panicula crassa capitulis composita 200-
1 240 mm longa. Capitula ovoidea 35 — 40 mm in diam.
Bracteae involucrales glabrae, valde transverso-ovatae, 5-
6 x 8-10 mm, manifeste alatae, alis hyalinis. Perianthium
rectum, 15-16 mm longum; tubus inflatus 5 mm longus,
proximaliter glaber, distaliter sparse sericeus; ungues gra-
ciles, adpresso-sericei, recurvati post anthesin; limbi
* Compton Herbarium, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X7,
Claremont 7735.
MS. received: 1993-02-15.
lanceolato-acuti. dense adpresso-sericei. Stylus rectus, gla-
ber, 12-14 mm longus. Stigma cylindrico-clavatum 1.5
mm longum, proximaliter leviter annulatum. Ovarium
ovoideum, 1 mm longum, dense villosum. Squamae
hypogynae lineari-subulatae, 1.5 mm longae. Fructus
achenium, late cylindricum vel parum obovoideum.
villosum, 7-8 x 3 mm, ad apicem rostratum, basis truncata
et pedicellata, fimbriata trichomatibus crassis (Figurae 1,
2 & 3).
TYPE. — Cape Province, 3319 (Worcester): Blokkop.
above Villiersdorp on southeast-facing slopes, (-CD), 2-
7-1992, Rourke 1971 , (NBG, holo.; BOL, E, K, MO,
NSW, PRE, S, STE).
Compact rounded shrub 200-300 mm high with single
stout main stem, 10-15 mm in diam., branching near
ground level, initially with fine juvenile leaves at base.
Mature leaves 130-230 x 65-140 mm. glabrous, usually
tripinnatifid, petiolate; petiole 60-75 mm long with prom-
inent pulvinus; leaflets canaliculate on upper surface 2
mm broad, apices obtuse. Inflorescence a stout panicle of
capitula opening basipetally, 700-1 240 mm long. Pedun-
cle up to 900 mm long, terete, glabrous, 4-6 mm in diam.
Capitula ovoid, 35—40 mm in diam. Involucral bracts gla-
brous, very broadly transverse-ovate, 5-6 x 8-10 mm,
prominently winged with hyaline wings. Receptacle very
narrowly conic-oblong, 15 x 3 mm. Floral bracts very
broadly transverse-ovate, glabrous, with hyaline wings.
Perianth straight in bud. 15-16 mm long: tube region in-
flated, 5 mm long, glabrous basally but sparsely sericeous
above; claws slender, adpressed sericeous, recurved at an-
thesis; limbs lanceolate-acute, densely adpressed seri-
ceous. Style straight, glabrous, 12-14 mm long. Pollen
presenter clavate-cylindric, slightly annulately thickened
at junction with style, 1.5 mm long; stigmatic groove ter-
Bothalia24,] (1994)
FIGURE 1. — Sen hi in ulusiupa Rourke, inflorescence and llowcrs. A, end of scape showing panicululely arranged eapiiula opening in basipeial
succession; B, longitudinal section through capitulum; C, perianth and floral bract prior to opening; D, perianth and floral bract after opening;
E, involucral bract; F, single perianth segment; G, gynoecium; H, mature fruit. A-G, Rourke 1971', H, Rourke 2005.
minal. Ovary ovoid, 1 mm long, sharply differentiated
from style, densely villous. Hypogynous scales linear-su-
bulate, 1 .5 mm long. Fruit broadly cylindric to slightly
obovoid, villous achene, 7-8 x 3 mm, beaked terminally,
truncate and pedicellate at base with basal fringe of stout
trichomes.
Diagnostic characters: Serruria altiscapa is related to
S. williamsii Rourke but is readily distinguished by its
short, compact habit, its exceptionally tall 700-1 200 mm
long inflorescences (hence the specific epithet), by the gla-
brous, prominently winged transverse-ovate involucral
and floral bracts and by the very utriculose perianth tube.
Bothalia 24,1 ( 1994)
3
sal shoot with emergent inflorescence scape (left) and the
strongly lignified persistent remains of previous years’ scape
(right). Type material, Rourke 1971 .
In S. williamsii the involucral bracts are clasping and cym-
biform with villously fimbriate margins and the inflores-
cences are usually shorter, from 100-400 mm. In addition,
the leaflet apices of S. altiscapa are obtuse, unlike the
sharply cuspidate leaflet apices in S. williamsii.
Serruria altiscapa is also related to S. elongata (P.J.
Bergius) R. Br. On Blokkop above Villiersdorp they occur
sympatrically and flower simultaneously, yet there is no
evidence of hybridisation, suggesting that there is a strong
genetic barrier between the two species.
The annual vegetative growth increments in this spe-
cies are rather short resulting in a low, compact, rounded
form in mature plants. In early winter certain vegetative
shoots produce a terminal peduncle 700-1 200 mm long
which develops into a large panicle of capitula with sec-
ond order branching. By early June the capitula begin
opening, in centrifugal succession, continuing until matu-
rity in November, by which time a new, short, vegetative
growth flush commences. An axillary bud below the fruit-
ing inflorescence develops into a new, short vegetative
shoot which then terminates in a further inflorescence the
following winter. As the peduncles are highly lignified
they persist for several years on the adult plants before
decaying. In some plants these lignified peduncles may
persist for from three to four years before disintegrating.
Distribution and habitat : at present only two occur-
rences of this species are known from nearly adjacent
mountains in the southwestern Cape. Several populations,
FIGURE 3. — Serruria altiscapa Rourke. Complete plant showing ha-
bit. Current season's inflorescence and persistent lignified re-
mains of inflorescences from three previous flowering seasons
are evident. Type material, Rourke 1971.
4
Bothalia 24,1 ( 1994)
each consisting of approximately 300 plants, occur on the
middle south slopes of Blokkop above Villiersdorp and
about 15 km to the west; there are a few smaller popu-
lations on the lower south slopes of the Hottentots Holland
Mountains in the Viljoen’s Pass-Nuweberg area (Figure
4A). Serruria altiscapa grows in mesic mountain fynbos
on south-facing slopes at elevations between 700 and
1 100 m. Flowering commences in early June, reaches a
peak in August and continues until October. Fruits are
shed during November and December.
It is regrettable that at the time of collecting the type
material (1992) the main populations of S. altiscapa on
Blokkop above Villiersdorp were in imminent danger of
being choked by Pinus pinaster saplings. Unless immedi-
ate attention is paid to removing this massive infestation
of alien vegetation, S. altiscapa has little chance of sur-
vival at this locality.
The oldest specimen of this species is a single leafless
inflorescence in the Burmann collection of the Delessert
herbarium in Geneva (sheet 005770/000143 in G-DEL).
The locality given is merely ‘Caput bonae Spei’ and al-
though no collector’s name is mentioned it was probably
gathered by H.B. Oldenland (1663-1697). Some 250
years elapsed before T.P. Stokoe obtained further herbar-
ium material in May 1935 since which time only seven
subsequent collections have been made, which is surpris-
ing considering dramatic growth form of the species.
CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): Blokkop above Villiersdorp, (-CD), Nov.,
Paterson -Jones s.n. ( NBG 122855 ); Blokkop above Villiersdorp, May,
Rourke 1 7/0(NBG); Blokkop, above Villiersdoip, July. Rourke 1971 (BOL,
FIGURE 4. — A, distribution of Serruria altiscapa Rourke; B, distribu-
tion of 5. gremialis Rourke. •; S. balanocepMala Rourke, O .
E, K, MO, NBG, NSW, PRE, S, STE); Blokkop above Villiersdorp, Nov.,
Esterhuysen 35578 (BOL); Drakenstein Mts near Villiersdorp, June, Van
Breda 1875 (PRE); Blokkop above Villiersdorp Wild Flower Reserve, in
fruit, Pan., Rourke 2005 (NBG). 3419 (Caledon): Nuweberg Forest Reserve,
(-AA), Aug., Rourke 827 (NBG); between Viljoen's Pass and Somerset
Sneeuwkop, Nov. 1942, Stokoe 8609 (BOL); between Viljoen’s Pass and
Somerset Sneeuwkop, 28-5-1935, Stokoe 3003 (BOL); Nuweberg, towards
Boesmanskloof, May, H.C. Taylor 10301 (PRE, STE).
Serruria gremialis Rourke sp. nov„ a habitu multi-
cauli patulo, capitulis manifeste pedunculatis, stylis
arcuatis adaxiali in dimidio inferiore pubescentibus, et
stigmate cylindrico-clavato, distinguitur.
Fmtex multicaulis e lignotubere, suberectus vel patu-
lus, 300-500 mm altus, ad 1 m in diam. Rami erecti ad
patentes, puberuli. Folia ascendentia vel subpatentia,
puberula sed glabrescentia; bipinnatifida ad tripinnatifida,
10-30 x 10-25 mm; petioli 2-12 mm longi; foliola can-
aliculata, acuta. Inflorescentia capitulum globosum 25-30
mm in diam., solitaria et terminalis vel terminalis aliquot
capitulis axillaribus; pedunculi 10-60 mm longi. Bracteae
involucrales ovato-acutae, dense velutinae. Perianthium
adaxialiter valde arcuatum, 12-15 mm longum, sericeum
vel villosum. Stylus cygneus, adaxialiter valde curvatus,
12-15 mm longus, puberulus in dimidio inferiore, glaber
et decrescens apicem versus. Stigma cylindraceo-clava-
tum, 2 mm longum. Ovarium ovoideum 2 mm longum,
lanatum. Squamae hypogynae subulato-acuminatae, 2 mm
longae. Fructus achenium ellipsoideum 7-8 mm longum,
ad apicem rostratum, basis truncata et pedicellata, fim-
briata (Figura 5).
TYPE. — Cape Province, 3319 (Worcester): Jonaskop,
Riviersonderend Range, lower north slopes below
Jonasplaats, (-CD), 30-7-1987, Rourke 1877 (NBG, holo.;
BOL, E, K, MO, NSW, PRE, S, STE).
An erect, suberect to slightly sprawling shrublet, 300-
500 mm in height, up to 1 m in diam., with multiple stems
produced from the crown of a persistent lignotuber.
Branches erect to sprawling, 2 mm in diam., puberulous.
Leaves , ascending to subpatent, puberulous initially, later
tending to glabrescent or glabrous, bipinnate to tripinnate,
10-30 x 10-25 mm, shortly petiolate; petiole 2-12 mm
long; leaflets terete, upper surface canaliculate, apices
acute. Inflorescence a pedunculate globose capitulum 25-
30 mm in diam., solitary and tenninal or terminal with
up to 3 axillary inflorescences; peduncle 10-60 mm long.
Involucral bracts ovate-acute, closely adpressed, cartilag-
inous, densely velutinous. Involucral receptacle oblong,
10-12 x 3-4 mm. Floral bracts broadly ovate, 4-6 x 4—5
mm, apex cuspidate; outer surface lanate proximally, se-
riceous distally. Perianth very strongly adaxially curved,
12-15 mm long; tube glabrous, 2 mm long; claws and
limbs sericeous to villous; limbs elliptic, 2 mm long, very
strongly adaxially curved. Style cygneous, strongly adaxi-
ally curved, 12-15 mm long, basal half puberulous, upper
half glabrous, carmine, tapering terminally. Pollen presen-
ter cylindric-clavate, 2 mm long; stigmatic groove termi-
nal. Ovary ovoid, sharply differentiated from style, 2 mm
long, lanate. Hypogynous scales subulate-acuminate, 2
mm long. Fruit an ellipsoid achene 7-8 x 3 mm, ad-
pressed sericeous, beaked terminally, truncate and pedi-
cellate basally, with basal fringe of trichomes.
Bothalia 24,! (1994)
5
FIGURE 5. — Serruria gremialis Rourke. A, flowering shoot; B. leaf; C, longitudinal section through inflorescence; D, open flower and subtending
floral bract; E, involucral bract; F, single perianth segment; G. gynoecium; H. habit; I, mature fruit. Type material, Rourke 1877.
Diagnostic characters'. Serruria gremialis is a multi-
stemmed lignotuberous species with a suberect to sprawl-
ing habit, prominently pedunculate capitula (peduncles
10-60 mm long), strongly adaxially curved perianths, cyg-
neous, strongly adaxially curved styles, puberulous in the
lower half and cylindric-clavate pollen presenters 2 mm
long.
Distribution and habitat', this species occupies a variety
of habitats in the Breede River valley from Stettynsberg
along the southern foothills of the Villiersdorp Mountains
to Viljoen's Pass, the northern foothills of Groenlandberg,
Houhoek and eastwards along Ezeljacht to the Caledon
Swartberg. However, its main area of distribution occurs
on the northern slopes of the Riviersonderend Mountains
from Donkerhoek and Boskloof in the west, eastwards to
McGregor reaching Bushman’s River at its most easterly
limits. Isolated populations also occur on Sandberg near
Robertson (Figure 4B). Most populations occur in mesic
mountain fynbos at elevations between 270 and 760 nt.
6
Bothalia24, 1 (1994)
Flowering extends over a period of almost eight months,
from July to February but is dependant on local factors
such as site, aspect and elevation.
Serruria gremialis is a relatively common and wide-
spread species which was collected as early as the 1 830’s
by Zeyher at Houhoek but was not subsequently recog-
nised as distinct. Meisner (1856) misidentified Zeyher’s
collection from Houhoek and cited it under S. elevata R.
Br. (= S. fucifolia Salisb. ex Knight). Later, in the Flora
capensis , Phillips & Hutchinson (1912) cited material be-
longing to no less than four different species under their
concept of S. acrocarpa R. Br., including what is here
described as S. gremialis. It is therefore not surprising that
since then herbarium material of the species now known
as S. gremialis has been identified under a number of dif-
ferent names, particularly as S. incrassata Meisn. and S.
acrocarpa R. Br.
The distribution ranges of S. gremialis and S. acro-
carpa are contiguous and almost mutually exclusive ex-
cept at one site, namely Silverstream near Boskloof in the
western Riviersonderend Mountains where they grow
sympatrically (Rourke 2000 , 2002).
The epithet gremialis (= growing in a cluster from a
stump) refers to the species’ habit of sprouting multiple
shoots from a lignotuber after burning.
CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): French Hoek Pass, Villiersdorp bridge,
(-CC), Jan., Compton 8172 (NBG); on mountain slopes between
Villiersdorp and Franschhoek, Nov., Bolus 5240 (BOL); near Genadendal,
(-CD), Burchell 7852 (SAM); Boschjeveld Mountains, Worcester side,
(-CD), Oct., Stokoe s.n. ( SAM 67852)-, Stettynsberg Mountains, (-CD),
June, Stokoe s.n. (SAM 61894)-, east slopes of Stettynsberg, (-CD), July,
Esterhuysen 15581 (BOL); Blokkop above Villiersdorp, (-CD), July,
Rourke 1 970 (NBG ); Jonaskop, Ri vier-sonderend Range, lower north slopes
below Jonasplaats, (-CD), July, Rourke 1877 ( BOL, E, K. MO, NBG, NSW,
PRE, S, STE); Riviersonderend Mts, Boschkloof, overlooking Farm Re-
treat, Poejenels Valley, (-DC), Nov., McDonald 1725 (PRE); Robertson
Dist., road between Agterkliphoogte and Robertson, (-DD), Sept., Simpson
95 (NBG); Sandberg, near Robertson lower slopes, (-DD), Sept., Rourke
1987 (NBG). 3419 (Caledon): Viljoen’s Pass, (-AA), Nov., Compton 8172
(NBG); Houhoek, (-AA), April, Guthrie s.n. ( NBG 105028)-, Groot
Houhoek, (-AA), Dec., Zeyher 3707 (SAM); Houhoek, (-AA), Feb.,
Schlechter 7330 (PRE); Caledon Baths, (-AB), Dec., Guthrie 3588 (NBG);
Silverstream near Boskloof between Villiersdorp and Genadendal, (-AB),
Nov., Esterhuysen 35297 (BOL, NBG); Silver-stream, upper reaches of
Waterkloof stream, western Riviersonderend Mts, (-AB), Nov., Rourke
2000 (NBG); Eseljagt Mountain, (-AB), July, Rourke 1969 (NBG);
Boesmanskloof Pass near McGregor, (-BA), Sept., Lewis 6069 (NBG);
Donkerhoek between Genadendal and Villiersdorp. (-B A), Dec., Pappe s.n.
(SAM); Bushmans River, (-BB), Sept., Compton 11914 (NBG).
Serruria balanocephala Rourke, sp. nov., a habitu
monocaule, capitulis pedunculatis terminalibus, stylis
basaliter puberulis adaxiale cygneis, stigmatibus conico-
acutis et perianthiis villosis, distinguitur.
Frutex erectus, monocaulis, 0.5- 1.0 m altus. Rami
erecti, puberuli demum glabrescentes. Folia ascendentia,
profunde bipinnatifida ad tripinnatifida 40-60 x 15-30
mm; petioli 10-20 mm longi; foliola canaliculata, sparse
puberula demum glabra. Inflorescentia capitulum
globosum pcdunculatum et aliquot capitula axillaria. Ca-
pitula ovoidea 25-30 mm in diam. Pedunculi 20-50 mm
longi, puberuli, graciles. Bracteae late ovatae, 5-6 x 2-3
mm, dense lanatae sed apices recurvi, glabri. Perianthium
adaxialiter valde cygneum, 12-14 mm longum villosum.
Stylus cygneus, adaxialiter valde curvatus, 12-14 mm
longus, basaliter puberulus. Stigma deorsum curvata,
ovoideo-acuta, stylo juncta collo angusto. Ovarium
ovoideum, 1 mm longum dense lanatum. Squamae
hypogynae subulatae, 1.5 mm longae. Fructus achenium
anguste ellipsoideum 8-10 x 2-3 mm, dense adpresso-
sericeum, ad apicem rostratum; basis truncata et pedi-
cellata, manifeste fimbriata (Figura 6).
TYPE. — Cape Province, 3320 (Montagu):, Muurrivier
Kloof, north slopes of the Langeberg in the Boosmansbos
Wilderness Area, (-DD), 7-9-1990, Rourke 1933 (NBG,
holo.; B, BOL, E, K, MO, NSW, PRE, S, STE).
An erect rounded shrub 0.5-1. 0 m in height, up to 1.5
m in diam., with single main stem up to 20 mm in diam.,
branching near ground level. Branches erect, puberulous,
tending to glabrescent later, 1. 5-2.0 mm in diam. Leaves
ascending, deeply bipinnatifid to tripinnatifid, 40-60 x
15-30 mm, petiolate; petiole 10-20 mm long. Leaflets
terete, canaliculate on upper surface, sparsely puberulous,
later glabrescent to glabrous, apices obtuse. Inflorescence
a single terminal pedunculate capitulum with several ax-
illary pedunculate capitula clustered towards apex of flow-
ering shoot, opening in basipetal succession. Capitula
ovoid, 25-30 mm in diam., peduncles 20-50 mm long,
crisped-puberulous, slender, peduncular bracts ovate-acu-
minate, glabrescent. Receptacle narrowly obconic, 10-12
x 3 mm. Floral bracts broadly ovate, 5-6 x 2-3 mm,
densely lanate, terminating in thickened slightly recurved
glabrous apex. Perianth strongly cygneous and adaxially
curved, 12-14 mm long; tube laterally compressed, gla-
brous, 2 mm long; claws strongly incurved, sericeous;
limbs ovate-acute, 1 mm long, 3 abaxial limbs villous,
adaxial limb adpressed-sericeous. Style strongly adaxially
cygneous, 12-14 mm long, lower third puberulous, car-
mine becoming reddish black towards apex. Pollen pre-
senter downwardly curved, ovoid-acute, with angular
facets, separated from style by narrow neck, dark reddish
black; stigmatic groove terminal. Ovary ovoid 1 mm long,
densely lanate. Hypogynous scales subulate, yellow, 1.5
mm long. Fruit a narrowly ellipsoid achene, 8-10 x 2-3
mm, densely adpressed-sericeous, beaked terminally, trun-
cate and pedicellate basally with prominent fringe of tri-
chomes.
Diagnostic characters'. Serruria balanocephala is a
single-stemmed re-seeder, with an erect, upright habit at-
taining 1 m in height at maturity with terminal peduncu-
late capitula. It is distinguished by its adaxially cygneous
style, puberulous in the lower half, the conic-acute,
slightly faceted pollen presenter and villous perianth.
Distribution and habitat: this species has a rather re-
stricted distribution along the northern slopes of the
Langeberg Range. It occurs from a few kilometres south-
east of Montagu, eastwards to Barrydale and thence to
Brandrivier just west of Garcia’s Pass, a distance of ap-
proximately 80 kilometres, but has not been recorded east
of Garcia’s Pass (Figure 4B). Serruria balanocephala ap-
pears to be confined to a narrow belt of dry mountain
fynbos, at elevations of approximately 600 to 650 m in
the lower northern foothills of the Langeberg, fringing the
Little Karoo. Flowering takes place between late August
Bothalia 24. 1 (1994)
FIGURE 6. — Serruria balanocephala
Rourke. A, flowering shoot,
bud and post pollination
phase; B, longitudinal section
through inflorescence; C, open
flower and subtending floral
bract; D, gynoecium; E, invo-
lucral bract; F, perianth limb;
G, leaf; H, lateral view of
conic-acute, slightly faceted
pollen presenter; I, mature
fruit. Type material, Rourke
1933.
and November. The inflorescences are pinkish silvery and
have no perceptible scent.
The epithet balanocephala is a compound from the
Greek balanos , an acom, and cephale, a head, alluding to
the distinctive ovoid-acute form of the pollen presenter.
CAPE. — 3320 (Montagu): north base of Langeberg Mts, 5-6 miles ESE
of Montagu towards Barrydale, (-DC), Aug. 1965, Dahlgren & Strid 2268
(NBG); Langeberg above Witbooisrivier, (-DD), Jan., Burger 97 (PRE,
STE); Grootvadersbos State Forest, north side of Langeberg above
Witbooisrivier, (-DD), Sept., McDonald & Morley 1013 (STE); Muurrivier
Kloof, north slopes of Langeberg near Barrydale, (-DD), Aug., Rourke 1881
(NBG ); Langeberg Mountain catchment area, Barrydale, municipal area,
lower slopes and next to Huis River, (-DD), Oct., T.J. van der Merwe 157
(PRE, STE); Muurrivier Kloof, north slopes of Langeberg in Boosmansbos
Wilderness Area, (-DD), Sept., Rourke 1933 (NBG. B, BOL, E, K, MO,
NSW, PRE, S, STE). 3321 (Ladismith): Brandrivier. between Barrydale and
Muiskraal, (-CC), 7-9-1967, Williams 1054 (NBG).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am most grateful to Mrs Ellaphie Ward-Hilhorst for
the care with which she prepared the line drawings and
to Mrs Jeanette Loedolff for the photograph in Figure 3.
REFERENCES
MEISNER, C.F. 1856. Proteaceae. In A.P. De Candolle, Prodromus sys-
tematic universalis regni vegetabilis 15: 283-299.
PHILLIPS, E.P. & HUTCHINSON, J. 1912. Proteaceae. In W.T.
Thiselton-Dyer, Flora capensis 5: 654-685.
ROURKE, J.P 1982. Two new species of Serruria Salisb. (Proteaceae)
from the southwestern Cape. Journal of South African Botany 48:
285-293.
ROURKE, J.P. 1 990. Four new species of Serruria (Proteaceae) from the
southwestern Cape. South African Journal of Botany 56: 497-
505.
ROURKE, J.P. 1991. 51 Serruria stellata Rourke. The Flowering Plants
of Africa: t. 2032.
'
Y
1
Bothalia 24,1: 9-14(1994)
Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from southern Africa. 4. Mannia
capensis , section and subgenus Xeromannia (Aytoniaceae)
S.M. PEROLD*
Keywords: Aytoniaceae, Hepaticae, Mannia capensis , M. capensis var. pallida, Marchantiales, southern Africa
ABSTRACT
A taxonomic account of the genus, Mannia, and its only local representative, M. capensis, together with its distribution in
southern Africa as currently known, is given. Mannia capensis var. pallida S.W. Arnell is not recognized here as a distinct
variety, since the 'sulphuric yellow' spores by which Arnell (1963) segregated it, can be ascribed to immaturity.
UITTREKSEL
'n Taksonomiese verslag oor die genus Mannia en die enigste plaaslike verteenwoordiger, M. capensis, saam met die
verspreiding daarvan in Suider-Afrika soos tans bekend, word gegee. Mannia capensis var. pallida S.W. Arnell word nie hier
as 'n egte varieteit erken nie, aangesien die ‘swawel-geel’ spore, waarvolgens Arnell (1963) dit afgesonder het, bloot aan
onvolwassenheid toegeskryf kan word.
Mannia Opiz in Corda, Genera hepaticarum.
Beitrage zur Naturgeschichte 12: 646 (1829); Frye & L.
Clark: 60 (1937); R. Schust.: 60 1 ( 1 953); D. Shimizu & S.
Halt.: 60 (1953); S.W. Arnell: 267 (1956); S.W. Arnell: 71
( 1963). Type species: M. raddii Opiz = M. triandra (Scop.)
Grolle.
Grimaldia Raddi: 356 (1818); Steph.: 792 (1898);
Howe: 40 (1899); Evans: 43 (1923); Sim: 21 ( 1926). Type
species: G. dichotoma Raddi, nom. illeg.
Synonymy partly after Grolle: 56 (1983a).
Thalloid, smallish to medium-sized, firm, compact and
somewhat leathery to lacunose dorsally, linear or strap-
shaped, bright green fresh, turning grey in older, dead
parts, margins black; in crowded patches, on shallow soil
covering rocky outcrops in exposed or somewhat sheltered
niches, xerophytic.
Branches simple, or once, rarely twice pseudo-dichoto-
mously branched, occasionally with latero-ventral or api-
cal innovations; thickened over midrib, gradually thinning
laterally into wings; apex entire, black tips of scale ap-
pendages reflexed over it; not grooved. Dorsal epidermis
hyaline, cell walls thin to thickened, trigones present; air
pores simple, inconspicuous, slightly raised, with 3 con-
centric rings of cells, their walls thin, leading below into
small air chambers, these storied, mostly not containing
chlorophyllose filaments; oil cells present; storage tissue
up to twice (or more times) thicker than assimilation tissue
above; ventrally reddish black; rhizoids some smooth, oth-
ers pegged; ventral scales in one row on either side of
midrib, red-black, large, obliquely triangular or semilunate
with 1 or 2 linear-lanceolate appendages, not constricted
at base, with a few scattered, colourless oil cells.
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001.
MS. received: 1993-03-26.
Dioicous , rarely monoicous, when gametangia on dif-
ferent branches. Antheridia immersed in rows along centre
of branches with projecting conical papillae turning pur-
ple. Carpocephala terminal, arising from apical notch and
raised on stalk with single rhizoidal furrow, disk apically
domed to low conical, not lobed, continuous with cam-
panulate involucres, each with protruding spherical cap-
sule, dehiscing by discrete apical lid, the wall lacking
annular thickenings. Spores with convex distal face bear-
ing conspicuous hemispherical bullae, wing thick and un-
dulating, proximal face on raised platform, with low
triradiate mark; elaters tapering, 2- or 3-spiral.
Mannia capensis (Steph.) S. W. Arnell, in Mit-
teilungen der Botanischen Staatssammlung, Miinchen 16:
263; S.W. Arnell 72: (1963); O.H. Volk: 233 (1979). Type:
Bloemfontein, leg. Rehmann (G, holo.!).
Thallus smallish to medium-sized, linear or strap-
shaped, occasionally jointed, firm and compact, older
parts rarely somewhat lacunose, bright green fresh, some-
times on exposure to strong sunlight, becoming reddish
or bronzed, especially toward margins, speckled with nu-
merous small, slightly raised stomata, boundaries of nar-
row air chambers below faintly visible from above, not
grooved, flat to slightly concave dorsally, margins with
black borders narrow distally, but gradually widening
proximally, somewhat scalloped, apically with cluster of
shiny, reddish black, lanceolate scale appendages reflexed
over edge when wet (Figure 1 A); Hanks black and shiny,
transversely slightly wrinkled, tightly incurved and meet-
ing along middle above dorsal face, becoming almost tu-
bular, and partly exposing closely imbricate ventral scales
with forwardly directed, oblique appendages, when dry;
in crowded patches, simple or once, rarely twice, pseudo-
dichotomously branched, sometimes with ventral innova-
tions emerging laterally or from apical V-shaped sinus.
Branches with total length up to 12 mm. terminal seg-
ments 3-7 mm long, closely to widely divergent, 2-4 mm
10
Bothalia 24.1 (1094)
FIGURE I .—Mannia capensis. A, dorsal aspect of male thallus with rows of antheridia; B, apical portion of female thallus with stalk arising rom
apical sinus and interrupted further up, at its tip bearing unlobed archegoniophore, involucres partly covering 2 capsules; C, ventral aspect o
thallus showing scales; D, transverse section of thallus; E, transverse section of male thallus through antheridia; F, transverse section of air
pore, dorsal cells, and assimilation tissue; G, air pore and dorsal cells from above; H, scales from foot of stalk; I, transverse section of stalk,
.1, ventral scale with one appendage; K, ventral scale with two appendages. A-D, G-I, K, Glen 2117; E, F-J, Koekemoer 637. Scale bars.
A_C, I mm; D, E, 500 pm; F, G, 50 pm; H, 1, 250 pm; J, K, 500 pm. Drawings by A. Pienaar.
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
wide, 525-775 |im thick over midrib, laterally thinning
out into wings (Figure ID); apex entire, hidden by re-
flexed appendages of distalmost ventral scales; margins
acute, dorsally black or bronze-black along edge, ventrally
entirely black, flanks sloping obliquely upward and out-
ward; ventral face medianly broadly keeled, black, on ei-
ther side of midrib a row of imbricate, obliquely directed
reddish black scales with appendages (Figure 1C). Dorsal
epidermal cells unistratose, hyaline, from above somewhat
polygonal, 27-30 x 15-25 pm. covered with minute spic-
ules, trigones conspicuous but not bulging, in transverse
section closely packed, rectangular, 30.0-37.5 x 15.0 pm;
marginal cells purple-black, isodiametric, 20 x 20 pm, or
rectangular, 27 x 15 pm, 2 or 3 rows wide, row at edge
with outer wall convex, trigones lacking; air pores slightly
raised, simple, oval or rounded, up to 25 x 15 pm. (88-)
100-200 pm distant from each other, bounded by 3 con-
centric rings of cells, the radial walls not thickened: in-
nermost row, the remains of a collapsed cell ring, usually
numbering 7 flattened cells, trapezoidal in shape, 10 pm
long, inner wall 5 pm wide, outer wall 10 pm wide, next
row generally composed of 8 cells, transversely ovate, ±
12.5 x 15.0 pm. partly overlying outer row of somewhat
curved, larger cells, ± 30 x 32 pm (Figure 1G); assimi-
lation tissue 200-250 pm thick in transverse section, air
chambers in several layers, medianly vertically storeyed,
toward margins obliquely sloping, densely crowded,
small, especially the lower ones, incompletely bounded
by uniseriate walls consisting of cells mostly 17.5 x 12.5
pm, and in uppermost layer, below air pore, with a few
erect chlorophyllose filaments, the top cell of which con-
ical, up to 37 x 15 pm, those below rounded, 22 x 25
pm, containing numerous chloroplasts, otherwise almost
impossible to distinguish between bounding cells and
those forming filaments (Figure IF); storage tissue 300-
500 pm thick, cells angular, 6- or 7-sided, 40-62 pm
wide; oil bodies solitary, scattered throughout thallus, al-
most entirely filling cell, ± 67 x 37 pm; rhizoids arising
from ventral epidennis, some smooth, up to 32 pm wide,
others pegged, only 10 pm wide. Scales ventral, in 2 lon-
gitudinal rows, one on either side of midrib, black to red-
dish black, obliquely triangular or semilunate, with
concave base, imbricate, large, body of scale ± 600 x 600
pm, cells rectangular, (35— )52— 62 x 17 pm, walls straight
or slightly sinuous, bearing 1 (Figure 1 J) or 2 (Figure IK)
(rarely 3), forwardly directed, linear- lanceolate append-
ages, not reaching thallus margins, except at apex, up to
± 110 pm long, 17.5 pm or 5 cells wide below, tapering
to single cell width toward apex, cells 32^f0 x 15-17
pm, remains of oil cells scattered, clear, round, 20 x 30
pm, margins entire, occasionally with a few mucilage pa-
pillae.
Dioicous (rarely monoicous, but gametangia on differ-
ent branches). Androecia consisting of up to 4 rows of
conical papillae, 100 pm high, acropetally arranged along
centre of branches (Figure 1A), green when young, turn-
ing purple with age, each with opening leading into im-
mersed antheridial cavity below (Figure IE). Gynoecia
terminal, emerging knob-like from V-shaped, apical sinus
and surrounded by numerous, arched, dark purple lanceo-
late scales up to 1150 pm long, narrowing from 4-6 cells
wide at base to one cell wide at apex (Figure 1H), stalk
eventually 5-25 mm long, cylindrical, 400 pm in diame-
ter, irregularly ovate in transverse section, with single rhi-
zoidal furrow (Figure II), only a few scales carried along
and also present, but obscured at top of stalk, where joined
to carpocephalum. the latter 2 mm across, straw-coloured,
domed to low conical, papillose centrally (with compound
pores), not or scarcely lobed, continuous with ( 1— )2 — 4- in-
FIGURE2. — Mannia capensis. SEM micrographs of spores and elaler. A, distal lace of spore; B, distal face ol spore slighil) tilted; C. distal lace ol
‘yellow’ spore; D, spore seen from side; E, proximal face of spore; F, elater. A, E, Eyles CH 1179; B, Bosnian 199; C. F, Volk 00828; D,
Burrows 2521. A, E, x 540; B. D. x 480; C. x 570; F , x 740.
12
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
volucres, these membranous, wide-mouthed and bell-
shaped, each with single, protruding, globular, dark brown
capsule (Figure IB), the wall with 4-6-sided cells, 27-62
x 37 pm, lacking annular thickenings and dehiscing along
row of smaller cells, 37 x 27 pm, forming a well-defined
lid. Spores 75-80 pm in diameter, polar, roughly triangu-
lar-globular, light brown, semitransparent, with distal face
convex (Figure 2A, B), bearing 10-13 crowded and very
conspicuous, hemispherical bullae, ± 22 pm wide, mostly
well separated from each other, occasionally 1 or 2 col-
lapsed; wing lighter, straw-coloured, 7.5 pm wide, porate
at each of 3 angles (or in between as well), wavy and
undulating, inflated and twisted in side view (Figure 2D);
proximal face with raised base, triradiate mark present but
weak (Figure 2E), slightly raised or not, arms not extend-
ing to edge, with shallow, crowded and overlying areolae
in centre, both faces generally covered with granules. EI-
aters reddish brown, tapering toward ends, 212-275 pm
long. 12.5 pm wide in centre, 7.5 pm wide at tips, 2-3-
spiral (Figure 2F). Chromosome number, n = 9 (Bomefeld
1987).
Mannia is said by Schuster (1992) to be a relatively
large genus with ± 18 species worldwide, but Engel
(1990) says that there are only six species. All of them,
except M. capensis , are from the northern hemisphere.
The species are generally distinguished from each other
by the size of the plants, the compactness of the assimi-
lation tissue, the colour and size of the scales and their
appendages and by the dorsal cells of the thallus, whether
they are thin- or thick-walled, whether the epidermis re-
mains intact and leathery, or regularly becomes lacunose
on ageing and whether the plants are aromatic or not.
Mannia capensis has spores which, in morphology, are
closely similar to those of the American M. califomica,
but in the latter species they are purple in colour. Two
subfamilies are recognized in the Aytoniaceae, Aytoni-
oideae and Reboulioideae. In southern Africa the latter
comprises the genera Asterella, Cryptomitrium and
Mannia.
The genus was originally known as Grimaldia Raddi,
but the specimen on which it was based, contained two
elements. Evans (1938) showed that the name, Grimaldia,
is illegitimate and recently Grolle (1983b) submitted a
proposal to conserve the name, Mannia Opiz (1829),
against Cyathophora S.F. Gray (1821). Two subgenera are
recognized by Grolle (1976): Mannia and Arnelliella, with
the former having two sections, Mannia and Sindonisce\
M. capensis was placed by him in section Mannia. Later
on, after the introduction of the new version of Article
10, ICBN (Voss et al. 1983), Grolle (1983c) changed this
grouping as follows:
subgenus Mannia (subgenus) Arnelliella (Mass.) Grolle,
with section Neesiella (Schiffn.) D. Shimizu & S. Hatt.
subgenus Xeromannia Grolle with sections Xeromannia
and Sindonisce.
The two species, M. fragrans and M. androgyna (the
latter selected as the type of subgenus Xeromannia ), are
classified in section Xeromannia. They are closest to M.
capensis and therefore, it too is placed in section Xero-
mannia, subgenus Xeromannia.
Schuster (1956, 1992) is, however, convinced that the
division of Mannia into subgenera, based largely on the
form of the aerenchyma tissue ‘compact’ versus ‘loose’,
is artificial. He concluded that it ‘is perhaps an artifact
based on environmentally induced distinctions’ (Schuster
1956). Furthermore. Schuster (1992) (and others) regard
the air chambers as lacking chlorophyllose filaments, stat-
ing that ‘secondary walls are largely incomplete, their free
margins are usually irregular, or even produced as short
teeth, which may give the superficial impression of rep-
resenting ‘free photosynthetic filaments’, as illustrated in
Figure IF of this study.
Grolle (pers. comm.) suspects that M. capensis could
be conspecific with M. androgyna. From the few authen-
tically named specimens of M. androgyna examined for
this study, it is difficult to come to a definite decision
about this, although its spore ornamentation is very similar
to that of M. capensis. The dorsal epidermal cells in M.
androgyna, described by Muller (1951-1958) as having
delicate walls, appear to be somewhat thicker-walled and
yellowish, the width of the pigmented margins of the thalli
is greater, it is generally a larger plant and the scale ap-
pendages extend beyond the thallus margins, particularly
the distal ones. Live plants of M. androgyna were unfor-
tunately not available for cultivation and comparative
study with M. capensis.
Fertile plants of M. capensis can be distinguished quite
readily from other members of the Marchantiales by the
stalked, domed and unlobed carpocephala, lacking a
pseudoperianth. Sterile specimens are more difficult to
distinguish, particularly from Targionia hypophylla and
small Asterella plants. In T. hypophylla, however, the dor-
sal air pores are larger, and, when dry, white-encircled; in
Asterella species, with the exception of A. muscicola, the
air pores and air chambers are generally difficult to detect
from above, wet or dry.
Although not common, Mannia capensis has been col-
lected over a wide area in southern Africa. It is known
from Namibia, western, central and eastern Transvaal, Or-
ange Free State, northern, central, western and southern
Cape Province, as well as from Zimbabwe (Best 1990)
(Figure 3). Bizot & Poes (1982) reported its occurrence
in East Africa on the Uluguru Mountains, as disjunct. Here
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
13
too, it grows in open, exposed sites. Otherwise it is found
in rocky clefts or on shallow soil covering granite, quartz-
ite, sandstone or sometimes dolomite, occasionally in as-
sociation with other liverworts such as Riccia spp. and
Plagiochasma spp. At Kogmanskloof, near Montagu in
the Cape, it grew together with Exormotheca pustulosa.
It is a pronounced xerophyte, with the storage tissue thick-
er than the assimilation tissue.
Arnell (1963) described a new variety from Kog-
manskloof, M. capensis var. pallida , on the basis of its
sulphuric yellow spores. These spores, as remarked by
Garside (note found with specimen Arnell 798 , (BOL
54675)). were, however, only immature. Garside further
noted that 'the bullae of the spore coat were also open at
the apex — perhaps by mounting in glycerine, they had
burst. I saw Dr Arnell’s preparation (at Sea Point where
he stayed)’. Signed 'S.G.' In a specimen, Volk 00828 , col-
lected at Okahandja. Namibia, two capsules were borne
in the same carpocephalum: one contained bright yellow
spores whereas the other had the usual brownish spores.
The ornamentation of the yellow spores was less well-
formed, with the papillae low or collapsed (Figure 2C)
and sometimes confluent; that of the brown spores was
as described above, thus furnishing clear proof for
Garside’s statement, that the yellow colour of the spores
must be ascribed to immaturity and does not justify vari-
etal status. Mannia capensis var. pallida S.W. Arnell is
accordingly not recognized here as a distinct variety.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
NAMIBIA. — 1918 (Grootfontein): Ossa, around shaly base of rocks,
(-CA), Volk 81/147 (M, PRE). 2016 (Otjiwarongo): 7 km S of Otji-
warongo, prominent granite hill near road, on soil in shade of boulders,
(-DA), Brusse 4206 (PRE). 2017 (Waterberg): ETO 98 Oros, Fels,
schattig, (-AA), Volk 00452 (M). 2116 (Okahandja): Okahandja OK 206,
auf Granit, (-DD), Volk 00828 (M). 2216 (Otjimbingwe): L WIN 329,
Matchless Mine, Glimmerfelstrip, (-DB), Volk 006771 (M). 2217
(Windhoek): Neudamm, Glimmerschiefer. Uberhiinge am Rivier, (-AD),
Volk 00685. 00686 (M); 10 km ostlich Kl. Windhoek, Glimmerschiefer,
Uberhang, (-CA), Volk 00905 (M); Bellerode, Glimmerschiefer,
Uberhang, (-CA), Volk 86-879a. 86-880 (M); WIN 63 Glimmerschiefer,
Oberhange schattig, in Rasen, (-CB). Volk 00948 (BOL. M); Voigtland.
Klipp-Kamp, an Felsen, (-CB), Volk 11400 (BOL, M). 2317 (Rehoboth):
REH 20, Giillschau, auf Granit, (-AC), Volk 6104 (M).
TRANSVAAL. — 2427 (Thabazimbi): Sterkstroom 250 KO farm, on
top of koppie between farmhouse and R5 17 road between Vaal water and
Ellisras, on soil overlying Waterberg sandstone, (-BD), Glen 2114. 2117
(PRE). 2527 (Rustenburg): Pilanesberg Nat. Park, along new road be-
tween main road and Mankwe loop, 1.0-1 .5 km from main road, on
humus-rich soil over white felsite, (-AC), Glen 2461. 2466 (PRE);
Rustenburg, 14 km N of, on road to Northam. on soil over granite
outcrops, (-CA), S.M. Perold 227 (PRE); Magaliesberg, Rietfontein
Farm, Hamerkop Kloof, on streambank on humus-rich soil overlying
quartzite, (-CD), Glen 3176 (PRE). 2528 (Pretoria): Pretoria, Won-
derboom, (-CA), Bosman CH 199 (PRE), Bonomley BOL 54667 ( BOL);
Hennops River Valley, (-CA), Meeuse 9621 (BOL, PRE); Magaliesberg
Range, 18 km W from Lanseria Airport. Plover’s Lake Farm (owner
Everard Read), up the hill, (-DD), Condy 46 (PRE). 2530 (Lydenburg):
15 miles NE of Lydenburg (-B A), Schelpe 5906 (BOL); Sudwala Caves,
between boulders on path between Dinosaur Park and cave entrance,
(-BC), Koekemoer 637a (PRE); Sudwala Caves, ± 30 km NW of
Nelspruit, on earth bank next to path leading to Dinosaur Park, (-BC),
S.M. Perold 402 (PRE). 2626 (Klerksdorp): Klerksdorp, (-DC), Sister
Victoria 273 (PRE). 2628 (Johannesburg): Kuilfontein Farm, 10 miles
SE of Heidelberg, quartzite rock, acid, sandy soil, (-CB), Mogg 37590
(PRE). 2630 (Carolina): Kangwane, Songimuelo Game Res., Farm
Kortbegin 168 IT, on soil along flat granite outcrop, (-BB), Smook 8236a
(PRE).
O.F.S. — 2729 (Volksrust): 42 km SE of Vrede on road to Ver-
kykerskop, Farm Drie Kop at Aasvoelkop, on ground between boulders
on steep slope above stream, (-CB). Smook 6422a (PRE). 2926
(Bloemfontein): Bloemfontein, Wilde Als Kloof, (-AA), Potts CH 1178
(PRE); Bloemfontein, Eagle’s Nest, (-AA), Potts CH 1266 (PRE);
Bloemfontein Botanical Garden, uncultivated part on hill, (-AA), Volk
81/062 (BOL, M, PRE). 3025 (Colesberg): 4 miles S of Trompsburg.
around base of boulders, S aspect, (-BB), Schelpe 5282 (BOL). 3026
(Aliwal North): 12 km SE of Bethulie, Cliftonvale Farm. Albert Dist..
foot of rocky cliffs at seepage zone, (-CA), H.H. Burrows 2521 (PRE).
CAPE. — 2723 (Kuruman): just east of Bretby Mine, in damp rock
crevices and under overhanging rocks in kloof, (-CA), Oliver 1450
(BOL). 2820(Kakamas): Augrabies, Granit Felssockel Uberhang, (-CB)
Volk 00554 (M). 2823 (Griekwastad): 32 miles east from Griquatown, in
seasonally wet limestone crevices, (-DC), Schelpe 5884 (BOL). 3123
(Victoria West): Three Sisters, (-CC), Schelpe 5830 (BOL). 3219
(Wuppertal): Clanwilliam Dist., Farm Mertenhof, Bidouw Valley, on
slope facing east below a Bushman Cave, (-AA), Oliver 1465 (BOL).
3224 (Graaff-Reinet): Naudesberg Pass, 40 km N of Graaff-Reinet, at
seepage at large vertical rocks at roadside, on soil, (-BA), S.M. Perold
947 { PRE). 3320 (Montagu): Kogmanskloof, (-CC), 5. Arnell 791. 795.
798 (BOL). 3322 (Oudtshoorn): Swartberge, First River, Nordseite,
Uferboschung, (-AC), Liibenau-Nestle SA 122 (PRE).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I wish to thank the following for the loan of specimens:
Prof. O.H. Volk. Wurzburg, the curators of BOL and G,
as well as Dr Liibenau-Nestle, Kempten, Germany, for the
loan of specimens. Dr R. Grolle is cordially thanked for
refereeing this paper and for drawing my attention to the
close similarity between Mannia capensis and M. an-
drogyna and their possible conspecificity. My thanks also
to my colleagues at NB1 for collecting specimens, to the
artist, Ms A. Pienaar, the typist, Mrs J. Mulvenna, and the
photographer. Mrs A. Romanowski. for their valued con-
tributions.
REFERENCES
ARNELL, S.W. 1956. Moss Flora of Fennoscandia. 1. Hepaticae.
Gleerup, Lund.
ARNELL, S.W. 1957. Hepaticae collected in South West Africa by Prof.
Dr O.H. Volk. Mitteilungen der Botanischen Staatssammlung,
Miinchen 16: 262-272.
ARNELL, S.W. 1963. Hepaticae of South Africa. Swedish Natural Sci-
ence Council, Stockholm.
BEST, E.B. 1 990. The Bryophyta of Zimbabwe — an annotated checklist.
Kirkia 13: 293-318.
BIZOT, M. & POCS, T. 1982. East African bryophytes V. Acta Botanica
Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 28: 15-64.
BORNEFELD, T. 1987, The natural system of the Marchantiales based
upon cytogenical and morphological evidence. Nova Hedwigia
45: 41-52.
CORD A, A.J.C. 1829. Genera hepaticarum. Beitrage zurNaturgeschichte
23: 643-655.
ENGEL, J.J. 1990. Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas) Hepaticae and An-
thocerotophyta: a taxonomic and phytogeographic study. Fieldi-
ana 25: 1-209.
EVANS, A.W. 1923. Rebouliaceae. North American Flora 14: 39-56.
EVANS, A.W. 1938. The invalidity of the genus Grimaldia of Raddi.
Chronica Botanica IV: 223-225.
FRYE, T.C. & CLARK, L. 1937. Hepaticae of North America. University
of Washington Publications in Biology 6: 8-104.
GRAY, S.F. 1821. A natural arrangement of British plants 1: 1-824.
GROLLE, R. 1976. Verzeichnis der Lebermoose Europas und benachbar-
ter Gebiete. Feddes Repertorium 87: 171-279.
GROLLE, R. 1983a. Nomina generica hepaticarum, references, types and
synonymies. Acta Botanica Fennica 121: 1-62.
GROLLE, R. 1983b. Proposals to conserve Mannia and Pellia (Hepatic-
opsida). Taxon 32: 135-137.
GROLLE. R. 1983c. Hepatics of Europe including the Azores. Journal
of Bryology 12: 403^-59.
HOWE, M.A. 1899. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotes of California. Mem-
oirs of the Torre y Botanical Club 7: 1-208.
MULLER, K. 1951-1958, Die Lebermoose Europas. Dr L. Rabenhorst’s
Kryptogamen-Flora 6: 416-471.
RADDI, G. 1818, Novarum vel rariorum ex Cryptogamia stirpium in agro
Florentino collectarum decades duae. Opuscoli scientifici di Bolo-
gna 2: 349-361.
14
Bothalia 24,1 ( 1994)
SHIMIZU, D. & HATTORI. S. 1953. Marchantiales of Japan 2. Journal
of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 10: 49-55.
SIM, T.R. 1926. The Bryophyta of South Africa. Transactions of the
Royal Society of South Africa 15: 1^475.
SCHUSTER. R.M. 1953. Boreal hepaticae. A manual of the liverworts of
Minnesota and adjacent regions. The American Midland Natural-
ist 49: 257-684.
SCHUSTER, R.M. 1956. Review: Marchantiales of Japan I-IV in Journal
of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 9: 32-44; 10: 49-55; 12:
53-75; 14: 91-107, by D. Shimizu & S. Hattori.
SCHUSTER, R.M. 1992. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of North
America 6: 1-937.
STEPHANI, F. 1898. Species hepaticarum. Bulletin de THerbier Boissier
6: 792-796.
VOLK, O.H. 1979. Beitriige zur Kenntnis der Lebermoose (Marchan-
tiales) aus Siidwest-Afrika (Namibia) 1. Mitteilungen der
Botanischen Staatssanvnlung, Miinchen 15: 223-242.
VOSS, E.G., BURDET, H.M., CHALONER, W.G., DEMOULIN, V„
HIEPKA, P, McNEIL, J.. MEIKLE, R.D.. NICOLSON, D.H.,
ROLLINS. R.C., SILVA. PC. & GREUTER, W. (eds) 1983.
International Code of Botanical Nomenclature adopted by The
Thirteenth International Botanical Congress. Sydney, August
1981. Regnum Vegetabile 111. Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema,
Utrecht, Antwerpen.
Bothalia 24, 1 : 15-23(1994)
Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from southern Africa. 5. The genus
Exormotheca , E. pustulosa and E. holstii
S.M. PEROLD *
Keywords: Exormothecaceae, Exormotheca holstii, E. megastomata, E. pustulosa, E. youngii , Hepaticae, Marchantiales, southern Africa
ABSTRACT
A taxonomic account of the genus, Exormotheca, and its local representatives, E. pustulosa and E. holstii, together with their
distribution in southern Africa as currently known, is given. Exormotheca megastomata is here treated as a synonym pf E. holstii
since no distinct morphological differences could be found between them.
UITTREKSEL
’n Taksonomiese verslag oor die genus Exormotheca en die plaaslike verteenwoordigers, E. pustulosa en E. holstii, saam
met hul verspreiding in Suider-Afrika, soos tans bekend, word gegee. Exonnotheca megastomata word hier as a sinoniem van
E. holstii beskou, aangesien geen duidelike verskille tussen hulle gevind kon word nie.
Exormotheca (Godm.) Mitten in Natural history of
the Azores or Western Islands: 325 (1870); Schiffn.: 29
(1893-1895); Solms: 2 (1897); Steph.: 218 (1899); K.
Mull.: 292 (1905-1916); Schiffn.: 40 (1942); K. Mull.:
398 ( 1951-1958); Hiissel de Menendez: 193 (1962) Type
species: E. pustulosa.
Myriorrhynchus Lindb. & H.W. Amell: 8 (1884). Type
species: M. fimbriatus.
Corbierella Douin & Trab.: 321 (1919). Type species:
C. algeriensis.
Thalloid, small to medium-sized to quite large, silvery
glaucous green, dorsally with numerous conical evagi-
nations of the epidermis; in crowded patches, in damp to
rather dry, exposed areas on gravelly or sandy soil or on
soil overlying rocky outcrops, xerophytic. Branches sim-
ple, or once, sometimes twice pseudo-dichotomously fur-
cate, apex entire to shallowly notched, dorsally not
grooved, slightly concave. Dorsal epidermis raised as pus-
tular or conical evaginations over low or tall air chambers,
opening above via simple air pores, encircled by thin-
walled cells and basally occupied by chlorophyllose,
sometimes branched, cell filaments, the lateral walls ver-
tical, hyaline; storage tissue % or ± Vl the thickness of
thallus, a rather loose mesh of open, round spaces or so-
called ‘Schleintzellen’ surrounded by smaller angular
cells, single oil bodies in scattered upper and lower cells;
ventrally keeled to rounded, green to purple, flanks slop-
ing obliquely upward and outward; rhizoids some smooth,
others tuberculate. Scales smallish to medium-sized, pur-
ple, oblong or rounded, occasionally with 1 or 2 append-
ages. otherwise large, hyaline with purple base, obliquely
triangular, with long, filiform appendages from apex.
Monoicous or ?dioicous. Antheridia in rows along mid-
dle of thallus, in shallow groove where development of
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101 , Pretoria 0001 .
MS. received: 1993-03-26.
air chambers temporarily suppressed, sunken, necks pro-
truding conspicuously. Gynoecia raised on stalk with sin-
gle rhizoidal furrow, receptacle erect or horizontal, when
hammer-like, the parenchymatous centre covered by air
chambers that open via simple pores, above or laterally,
with 1 or 2 capsules, each supported by a seta, exserted
from bilabiate involucre and dehiscing by 4 or 5 valves
after shedding operculum; otherwise subsessile, lacking
stalk, central dome with air chambers above, epidermis
extended laterally and turning purple, forming involucres
that cover capsules on either side; capsule wall with cells
containing semi-annular thickenings. Spores 70-75 pm or
almost twice as large, ± 140 pm. triangular-globular, distal
face with large hollow, conical papillae or convoluted
areas covered with granules, proximal face without trira-
diate mark, heavily encrusted with granules; elaters taper-
ing, up to 150 pm long and trispiral or blunt at one end,
much shorter and unispiral or ringed.
Two genera are classified in the family Exormothe-
caceae K. Mull, ex Grolle (1983): Exormotheca Mitten
and the Indian Stephensoniella Kashyap. Three subgenera
are recognized in the genus Exormotheca: Exormotheca
(for E. pustulosa and E. tuberifera), Corbierella (Douin
& Trab.) Schiffn. (for E. welwitschii , E. algeriensis and
E. holstii) and Myrriorhynchus Lindb. & H.W. Amell (for
E. fimbriata) (Schiffner 1942).
Exormotheca pustulosa Mitten in Natural history
of the Azores or Western Islands: 326 (1870); Solms: 2
(1897); Steph.: 218 (1899); K.I. Goebel: 244 (1905); K.
Mull.: 292 (1906-1912); Schiffn.: 46 (1942); K. Mull:
399 (195 1-1958); S.W. Amell; 74 (1963); O.H. Volk: 232
(1979). Type: Madeira, Pico de Barcellos, leg. Johnson
(NY, holo.!).
E. africana Steph.: 18 (1917). Type: Transvaal, in Wa-
terfall gorge near Belfast, leg. Pole Evans (G).
16
Bothalia 24.1 (1994)
FIGURE 1 . — Exormolheca puslulosa. Anatomy of thallus. A, dorsal 1’acc of monoieous thallus seen from abo\ e. with row s ol anihernlia m groos es
toward apices and with young gynoecium at furcation; B. ventral face of thallus, showing scales; C, stalk (cut off) emerging just proximal to
furcation of thallus; D, 'hammer-like' head of carpocephalum with 2 dehisced capsules; E, air chamber with assimilation tissue filaments and
some storage tissue cells; F, transverse section of thallus showing two antheridia; G, air pore and surrounding cells from above; H, scale; I,
capsule wall in transverse section; .1, capsule wall from above; K, transverse section of stalk with one rhizoidal furrow. A, B, F, H,S.A/. Perold
2604 ; C, D. I-K, S'. W. Arnell 79E, G, Cl. Reid 1107a. Scale bars: A-D, 1 mm; E, G, I, J, 50 |im; F, H, 500 pin; K, 100 pm. Drawings by A.
Pienaar.
Botha] ia 24,1 (1994)
17
Thallus rather small, linear to ligulate, glaucous green,
with numerous conspicuous, partly adjoined conical
evaginations of the air chambers forming pustules (Figures
1A; 2E), opening above via air pores, dorsally toward
apex slightly concave medianly, otherwise Hat and not
grooved along midline, margins with scales extending
above or hardly so, when wet; flanks covered by imbric-
ate, purple or partly hyaline scales, generally tightly in-
curved over whitish, dorsal face when dry; in crowded
patches, simple, or once, occasionally twice (-3 times)
symmetrically or asymmetrically pseudo-dichotomously
furcate. Branches with total length up to 8 or 9 mm, seg-
ments 3-5 mm long, variously divergent, 2(-3) mm wide,
± 1000 pm thick; apex slightly tapering to rather blunt,
shallowly notched or entire; margins somewhat obtuse,
becoming more acute proximally; ventrally quite strongly
keeled, green, flanks sloping obliquely upward and out-
ward, covered by scales (Figure IB). Dorsal epidermal
cells unistratose. hyaline, rectangular to 5-sided or poly-
gonal. 30-75 x 22-25 pm, thin-walled and completely
lacking trigones, raised into conical protuberances (Fig-
ures IE; 2F); ± 300 pm high and 150-180 pm wide, in
(8)9-11 irregular rows across width of thallus; air pores
(Figure 1G) at or near top of cone, simple, round or oval,
up to 62 pm wide, bounded by 2 concentric rings of
smaller, thin-walled cells, inner cells mostly 8, ± 20.0 x
1 2.5 pm, outer cells ± 45 x 25 pm; assimilation tissue ±
200 pm thick, occupying lower ± 2/3 of air chambers,
and consisting of densely crowded filaments, sometimes
branching from close to base, top 3-5 cells free, apical
cell conical, 25-50 x 15 pm, those below rectangular,
27-32 x 22-25 pm, filled with numerous chloroplasts;
storage tissue ± 700 pm thick, loosely composed, with
larger empty spaces or so-called ‘slime’ cells, up to 80
pm wide, encircled by smaller cells ± 50 pm wide, in
between a number of cells, also ± 50 pm wide, each con-
taining a brown, granular oil body. 37.5 x 30.0 pm; rhi-
zoids arising from ventral epidermis, some smooth, 1 2.5—
20.0 pm wide, but mostly tuberculate, ± 12.5 pm wide.
Scales imbricate, apical ones oblong to rounded (Figure
IH), proximally shorter than wide, 500-1000 x 540-850
pm, occasionally with 1 or 2 appendages at margin, pur-
ple, generally with 1 or 2 cell rows at apex and base
hyaline, rarely entirely hyaline, projecting above thallus
margins or not, cells in body of scale 5- or 6-sided, up to
137.0 x 37.5^12.5 pm, smaller at margin and often brick-
shaped, 17.5 x 50.0 pm, lacking oil cells.
Monoicous (or rarely ?dioicous). Androecia in 1-3
rows along middle of thallus, close to female receptacle
(distal or proximal to it), antheridia sunken, their necks ±
175 pm long, protruding above surface between air cham-
bers, which are suppressed here to form a shallow groove
(Figure 1A). Gynoecia just proximal to bifurcation of 2
terminal branches, emerging as a central, round green
cushion, at maturity raised on a cylindrical stalk (Figure
1C), basally purple-streaked, the remainder yellowish,
length variable, up to 10 mm, diameter 350 pm, with a
single rhizoidal furrow, in transverse section (Figure IK)
cortical cells similar to medullary ones, average size 25.0
x 17.5 pm, top of stalk loosely sheathed in a short col-
lar-like outgrowth of the head, the latter internally filled
with parenchymatous tissue and covered by a row of fila-
ment-containing air chambers that open via hardly raised
simple air pores, laterally with a capsule exserted from
bilabiate involucre on either side, 3 mm across and ham-
mer-like in appearance (Figure ID), frequently, however,
bearing only 1 capsule above, when erect and oblong.
Capsule sheathed in thin calyptra, ± spherical, wall brown,
unistratose, upper part forming an operculum, cells some-
what smaller, otherwise similar to the rest. ± 57.5 x 25.0
pm, spindle- or irregularly shaped with semi-annular
thickenings (Figure 1J). in transverse section 30 pm thick,
with ‘rods’ projecting inwardly (Figure II). dehiscing by
FIGURE 2. — Exonnotheca puslulosa. Spores and thallus. A, distal lace of spore; B, outer wall of papilla broken down, show ing minute internal
granular ‘pillars’ ; C, proximal face of spore; D, granules on proximal face; E, thallus; F, conical air chamber opening above via air pore. A-D.
5.VE A me II 79 1\ E, F, S.M. Perold2604. A, C,x 515; B, D, x 3980; E, x 16; F, x 265.
18
Bothalia 24. 1 (1994)
4 or 5 irregularly shaped valves and folding back, petal-
like, seta up to 1625 x 500 pm, with ± 30 rows of cortical
cells in transverse section, foot rounded. Spores 70-75
pm in diameter, polar, triangular-globular, bright honey-
brown, distal face (Figure 2A) rounded, with up to ± 50
crowded, hollow, conical papillae, 10 pm high and 10 pm
wide, walls of papillae composed of numerous adjoining
granules stacked into tiny pillars in some areas and only
exposed where wall has broken down (Figure 2B); prox-
imal face with vestigial triradiate mark or part of it occa-
sionally present (Figure 2C), entirely encrusted with fine
granules (Figure 2D); wing absent, margin scalloped by
protruding papillae on distal face. Elaters honey-brown,
not tapering toward ends, up to 150 x 10 pm, trispiral.
Chromosome number, n = 16 (Bischler 1976).
DISCUSSION
As a member of this rather rare genus Exormotheca,
E. pustulosa is quite widespread, although the single,
highly disjunct record from Mexico (Bischler 1976) may
be an introduction (Gradstein et al. 1983). The latter au-
thors regard it as an Afro-American disjunct with a Sub-
tropical-Mediterranean range. It is known from the
following Mediterranean c mntries: Portugal, Spain,
France (with only one locality (Bischler & Jovet-Ast
1981)) and Italy, as well as from the Atlantic islands:
Azores, Madeira, the Canaries, Cape Verde and St Helena;
also from two island groups (or islands) in the Indian
Ocean: the Comores and Reunion (Bischler 1976). It is
further known from Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates
and Oman (Frey & Kurschner 1988) as well as from the
following African countries: Morocco, Chad, Ethiopia,
and also from Kenya, Tanzania (Bizot & Poes 1979), An-
gola, Zimbabwe and southern Africa. In southern Africa
(Figure 3) E. pustulosa has been quite rarely collected in
Namibia (O.H. Volk pers. comm.), as well as in western,
central, southern and eastern Transvaal, Orange Free State,
Lesotho and southwestern Cape.
Frey & Kurschner (1988) regard E. pustulosa as a xero-
thermic Pangaean taxon. They define the xerothermic
Pangaean element as comprising representatives with a
present pattern of distribution corresponding to the Per-
motriassic continental Pangaea region. Exormotheca
pustulosa grows in association with other liverworts, such
as Riccia species and Mannia capensis on soil around
granite or sandstone outcrops, which are generally only
temporarily wet. Under rather wetter conditions the ven-
tral scales are less conspicuous and almost entirely hya-
line. Vegetative reproduction is by ventral tubers
(Knollchen) which were spherical, scale-clad, 500 pm
wide structures in S.W. Arnell 791, one of only three
southern African specimens that had mature sporophytes.
Schiffner ( 1 942) had already placed E. africana Steph.
in synonymy under E. pustulosa, when Arnell (1953a)
stated that he could not find any real differences between
E. pustulosa and E. africana. The Indian species, E.
tuberifera, described by Kashyap (1914), seems very
closely related to E. pustulosa and so does E. ceylonensis
Meijer (1956). Exormotheca pustulosa can be distin-
guished by its low conical air chambers ± % filled with
chlorophyllose cell filaments, by its small size, oblong or
rounded purple scales, by its stalked carpocephala, by its
spore ornamentation and by its spherical tubers.
FIGURE 3. — Distribution of Exormotheca pustulosa , U, and E. holstii ,
•, in southern Africa.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
TRANSVAAL. — 2427 (Thabazimbi): Kransberg, Farm Geelhout-
bos, NE of Thabazimbi, at T-junction of upper 2 kloofs, (-BC), S.M.
Perold 2993 (PRE); Waterberg, Welgevonden Estate, drift on Sterk-
stroom above farmhouse on cliffs, (-BD), Glen 2140. 2145 (PRE). 2527
(Rustenburg): Rustenburg Golf Course, (-CA), Heart CH 3664 (PRE).
2528 (Pretoria): Baviaanspoort, (-CB), Bosnian CH 1533 (PRE); 18 km
NE of Cullinan, on road to Sybrandskraal, near turnoff to De Tweede-
spruit, Konsensusgrotte above Malanspruit, on soil under overhanging
rock, (-DA), S.M. Perold 2604 (PRE). 2529 (Witbank): Loskop Dam
Nature Reserve, Rhenosterhoek, in gully under vegetation on edge of
exposed rock sheet, on loamy soil, small local population with Riccia
natalensis, (-AD), Cl. Reid 1107(a) (PRE); Krantz, 3 miles N of Middel-
burg, high above river, on moist soil, (-CD), Van der Merwe CH 229
(PRE). 2627 (Potchefstroom): 6 km N of Carltonville, on the road to
Pretoria, at rock outcrop immediately N of Wonderfontein, with Riccia
spp., (-AD), S.M. Perold 1207 (PRE).
O.F.S. — 2925 (Jagersfontein): Fauresmith, on Reserve koppie, (-
CB), Liebenberg CH 3659 (PRE). 3025 (Colesberg): 4 miles south of
Trompsburg, at round boulder bases on S aspect of outcrop, (-BB),
Schelpe 5284 (BOL).
LESOTHO. — 2828 (Bethlehem): ± 35 km before Oxbow on road
from Butha-Buthe, on vertical soilbank of small stream, (-CB/CD),
Perold & Koekemoer 2941 (PRE); ± 1 8 km before Oxbow on road from
Butha-Buthe, at seepage area above road, (-DC), Perold & Koekemoer
2952 (PRE).
CAPE. — 3219 (Wuppertal): Olifants River Valley, between Klawer
and Citrusdal, on moist soil by wayside, (-AC?), Wilman 664 (BOL,
PRE). 3320 (Montagu): Kogmanskloof, (-CC), 5.VT Antell 791, 798
(BOL).
Exormotheca holstii Steph. in Bulletin de FHerbier
Boissier 7: 145 (1899); Schiffn.: 66 (1942); S.W. Arnell:
76 (1963); O.H. Volk: 231 (1979). Type: Deutsch-Ost-
Afrika (Tanzania), Muse, plains, in moist sandy spots
[regio campestris, in locis arenosis humidis], leg. Holst
3107 (G 024591, holo.!).
E. youngii S.W. Arnell: 283 (1953b). Type: Transvaal,
Pilgrim’s Rest, Hendriksdal, on dry rocky veld, leg. E.M.
Young ( Duthie 5211) (BOL 54651, holo.!).
E. megastomata C. Marquand: 237 (1930). Type:
Transvaal, Krantz, 3 miles N of Middelburg, leg. F. Van
der Merwe CH 214 (BM, holo.), CH 214 (PRE, iso.!);
BOL 54643 (Duthie 5042), iso.!, synon. nov.
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
19
Thallus medium-sized to quite large, broadly linear to
± ovate (Figure 4A), silvery green, with numerous con-
spicuous, conical evaginations of the air chambers (Figure
5B, C), medianly narrow and somewhat lower, laterally
mostly wider and taller, each opening above via an air
pore (Figure 5A), dorsally flat to centrally slightly con-
cave or shallowly grooved toward apex, scales at margins,
except at apex, mostly hidden when wet; concave to ap-
parently slightly grooved along midline of dorsal face,
white, with hyaline, apical and distal scales incurved over
margins or erect, when dry; in crowded patches, simple
or once, rarely twice or 3 times pseudo-dichotomously
furcate, symmetrical or not. Branches with total length
8—1 5(— 22) mm, terminal segments generally 4— 7(— 10) mm
long, moderately divergent, (2.5-)3.0-5.0(-7.0) mm wide,
2125-2900 pm thick; apex slightly tapering, with shallow
notch, margins obscured by air chambers; ventrally
rounded to flattish, green, or with transverse extensions
of purple scale bases or entirely purple, flanks basally
tinged with purple, sloping slightly obliquely upward and
outward (Figure 4C) covered with large hyaline scales.
Dorsal epidermal cells unistratose, hyaline, raised into 4—
6-sided air chambers, centrally 1000 x 150 pm and mar-
ginally 1500 x up to 500 pm. in 8-12 irregular rows
across width of thallus, attached to each other at sides,
but narrower apical part free (Figure 4E) for ± 250 pm,
at margins of thallus at least 500 pm at top free; cells
mostly 5- or 6-sided (Figure 4E) near top of elevated
cones 65-75 x 42-50 pm. lower down elongated, 1 25—
1 75(— 260) x 30-50 pm, thin-walled, air pores at or near
tip of cone (Figures 4D; 5D), simple, rounded or elon-
gated, ( 80—) 1 25—1 37 x 50— 75(— 85 ) pm, bounded by
smaller cells, 75-112 x 27-30 pm, sometimes a single
cell, ± 37 x 37 pm. or part of a larger cell jutting into
lumen of air pore; assimilation tissue 350—100 pm thick,
occupying basal Vs-l A of air chambers, and composed of
densely crowded filaments (Figure 4F), 7 or 8 cells long,
top cell with conical tip, 62.5 x 17.5 pm, others 67.5 x
32.5 pm, some filaments branching from near base, filled
with chloroplasts; storage tissue 1000-1150 pm thick,
cells forming a rather open mesh with ‘rounded spaces’,
150 x 100 pm, surrounded by smaller, mostly angular
cells, ± 62 x 50 pm, toward the top and base of storage
tissue and quite numerous, cells containing oil bodies,
these transversely oval. 67.5 x 55.5 pm, yellow, not en-
tirely filling cells; ventral epidermal cells isodiametric or
not, giving rise to rhizoids, some smooth, 17.5 pm wide,
others tuberculate, 12.5 pm wide. Scales imbricate (Figure
5E, F). large, 1250-1625 pm long, 900-1500 pm wide at
base, hyaline but base purple, somewhat obliquely trian-
gular with vertical side ± entire, facing toward apex of
thallus, diagonal side often toothed, cells in body of scale
long-hexagonal. 225-250 x 37-62 pm, smaller at base,
lacking oil bodies, apex mostly with branched or un-
branched, filiform appendages up to 5 (Figure 4G), 700-
1000 pm long, cells 150 x 20 pm.
Monoicous or dioicous or ?protandrous, rarely produc-
ing gametangia of both sexes simultaneously. Androecia
in 2^1 irregular rows along midline of thallus (Figure 4B),
in 1 or 2 successive linear groups, antheridia sunken,
necks protruding conspicuously, ± 1000 pm, between cen-
tral air chambers, development of the latter here tempo-
rarily suppressed. Gynoecia developing near apex of
thallus (which continues growth), causing widening and
hollowing of latter, somewhat sunken, sessile, mostly in
single groups (Figure 4A) ± 4 mm wide, occasionally with
a second one behind the first, supported on central core
of dense parenchymatous tissue, 1500 pm wide, on either
side I (or 2) slightly obliquely held capsules, 1500 pm
wide, wall with cells containing semi-annular thickenings
(Figure 41, J), on short seta, 500 x 550 pm, ± oval in
shape, cortical cells hardly differentiated from medullary
ones (Figure 4K), sheathed in thin calyptra, capsules sep-
arated by taller central dome, ± 2250 pm wide, containing
elongated air chambers (Figure 4H), basally with cellular
filaments and opening above via simple air pores, sur-
rounded by thin-walled cells, and otherwise covered by
larger cells with thicker, purple-stained walls; covering
layer of dome forming a groove laterally and continuing
on both sides as deeply purple-stained extensions; the in-
volucres, containing numerous cells with oil bodies, partly
covering capsules and at scalloped margins with smaller,
thinner-walled cells. Spores 117.5-142.5 pm in diameter,
polar, triangular-globular, dark red, distal face (Figure 6A)
rounded, with 6-8 highly convoluted, raised areas across,
22.5-27.5 pm wide, bordered by superimposed layers of
granules and hollowed in the centre, distinctly or poorly
separated by deep furrows (Figure 6B); proximal face with
triradiate mark absent (Figure 6D), but with slight flatten-
ing of the 3 facets, entirely encrusted with numerous, tiny
granules; wing absent (Figure 6C, E), margin scalloped
by projecting convoluted areas from distal face. Elaters
brownish red, tapering slightly at one end, blunt and
thicker at the other, 70-90 x 20 pm, unispiral or ringed
(Figure 6F). Chromosome number, n = 18, 32 (T.
Bomefeld pers. comm, via O.H. Volk).
DISCUSSION
Exormotheca holstii and E. pustulosa are the only two
species belonging to this rather rare genus, that also occur
in southern Africa. Exormotheca holstii has been reported
in southern Africa (Figure 3) from Namibia [several col-
lections recorded by Volk (1979)]. Botswana, northern,
central, eastern and southern Transvaal, Natal, Orange
Free State and northern Cape Province. Most gatherings
are from the Transvaal, as in recent times it has become
a more thoroughly collected area, as far as bryophytes are
concerned. Exormotheca holstii has also been found else-
where in Africa, namely Tanzania (locus classicus ) and
Zimbabwe (Best 1990). It appears to prefer quite dry,
somewhat sandy or gravelly soil, sometimes between
grass or in exposed areas that are only occasionally wet
and that overlie sandstone or quartzitic or granitic rock.
It sometimes grows in association with Riccia species,
such as R. volkii, R. rosea and R. albovestita.
Marquand (1930) described a new species of Exor-
motheca. E. megastomata, based on a sterile specimen
from Middelburg, Transvaal. This plant and its scales are
somewhat larger than in E. holstii Steph.. but the ratio of
the surface area of an apical scale to that of a section of
the thallus, works out to the same for both; no other sig-
nificant differences between E. megastomata and E. holstii
could be found after careful study of the type specimens
of both species. I. accordingly, regard them as conspecific
and place E. megastomata in synonymy under E. holstii.
Marquand stated that E. megastomata ‘is distinct from all
previously described species of that genus in the very tall
20
Bothalia 24,1 ( 1994)
I l( JURE 4. — Exormotlieculiolsiii. Anatomy of thallus. A, tliallus with sessile caipoeephalum IVom above: B, thallus with antheridial necks emerging
between air chambers in midline; C, transverse section of thallus showing tall air chambers, chlorophyllose cell filaments and storage tissue;
D, air pore and surrounding cells from above; E, top part of two partly adjoining air chambers; F, assimilation tissue with cell filaments; G,
scale with branched filiform appendages; H, caipoeephalum, upper half three dimensional, lower half in transverse section; I, capsule wall
from above; J, capsule wall in transverse section; K, transverse section of seta. A, H, K, Gennishuizen 2839; C, Perold & Koekemoer 2872;
D, S.M. Perold 2702; E, F, Glen 2190 ; G, I, J, Holst 3107. Scale bars: A-C, H, 1 mm; D-F, I— K, 100 pm; G, 500 pm. Drawings by A.
Pienaar.
Bothalia 24. 1 (1994)
21
FIGURE 5. — Exonnotheca Iwl.siii. Thai 1 us, A, thallus from abo\c, with conical air chambers; B, air chambers seen from side; C. air pores seen from
above; D, air pore at apex of cone; E, scales inflexed over apex of thallus; F, scales seen from side. A-F, R. Smit s.n. A, x 8; B, x 26; C, E x
34; D, x 150; F, x 35.
stomata’, for which he named it, and so he made the same
error as Stephani ( 1899) in referring to an entire air cham-
ber as a stoma — Schiffner (1942) had already drawn at-
tention to this. In his protologue. Marquand compared
only E. africana Steph. (a synonym of E. pustulosa) to
his new species, which is a much larger plant and differs
in several other aspects as well, such as the tall air cham-
bers and the conspicuous, triangular, mostly hyaline scales
with filiform apical appendages. Curiously, Marquand re-
ported the marginal scales of E. megastomata as ‘minute’
and was followed in this by Arnell (1963), who also re-
ferred here, but not elsewhere, to the air chambers as sto-
mata. In his description of a new species, Exonnotheca
youngii , Arnell (1953b) reported that it differed from E.
megastomata by the large marginal scales and by the free
air chambers (‘free from one another down to the base’).
FIGURE 6. — Exonnotheca hoist ii. Spores. A, distal luce; B, granules on distal face much enlarged; C. side view; D. proximal face; E. boundary
between proximal and distal face; F, elater. A, D, Volk 011670 ; C, Volk 85-766\ B. E, F, Holst 3107. A, x 293: B. E, x 794; C, x 324; D, x
300; F, x 700.
22
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
Arnell (1963) later placed E. youngii in synonymy under
E. holstii. In his key to three species of Exormotheca,
Arnell (1963) also referred to the air chambers in E. holstii
as being free almost to the base. This is contrary to my
findings (see above). Stephani (1899) also described the
stomata (sic) of E. holstii as ‘densissima altissima, ad
% coalita, tertio supero libera’, and Schiffner (1942) re-
ferred to the air chambers as ‘seitlich bis drei Viertel
verwachsen'. AmeH’s observations must, therefore, have
been based on an error. In Schiffner’s (1942) monographic
study of the genus Exormotheca , he makes no reference
to E. megastomata. In this work he refers to the contro-
versy between himself and Muller (1940, 1941) concern-
ing the application of the epithet, E. bullosa , which he
suggested ‘als Art einzuziehen ... isf . I discussed this in
greater detail in Perold ( 1991 ), urging a return to its earlier
epithet, E. welwitschii , and furnishing reasons for it.
Fruiting collections of those Exormotheca species that
are characterized by sessile carpocephala, are extremely
rare and have only been illustrated once before by Douin
& Trabut (1919). They described Corbierella algeriensis,
a synonym of E. algeriensis , as dioicous. Of the speci-
mens studied in the present work, Giess 15383 is defi-
nitely monoicous; of the remaining 53 specimens, only
the type specimen of E. holstii, Holst 3107, Volk 01160
and Germishuizen 2839 have mature sporangia and are
dioicous or possibly protandrous.
Volk (in litt.) identified his collection Volk 81/015, from
Middelburg (the type locality of E. megastomata ), as E.
megastomata', Bomefeld (in litt.) found its chromosome
number to be n = 18, whereas specimens from Namibia
have n = 32 chromosomes. Bomefeld and Volk are of the
opinion that the material from Middelburg and from
Namibia represents two different species. However, two
different chromosome numbers manifested here are not
reflected in morphological differences. The same phenom-
enon was observed in some Riccia species, e.g. R.
argenteolimbata (Volk et al. 1988), where as many as five
chromosome numbers were found in the same species.
Exormotheca holstii can be distinguished from other
species in the genus by its large size, by its tall air cham-
bers, basal V5-V3 occupied by chlorophyllose filaments,
and laterally adjoined except for the apical 250 pm toward
the centre of the thallus and marginally for the apical ±
500 pm; by the large, hyaline, triangularly shaped scales
with long filiform appendages and by its subsessile
gynoecia. Tubers were not found.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
NAMIBIA. — 1918 (Grootfontein): Gaikos, on quartzite sand, (-AD),
Volk 81/124 (M, PRE). 2116 (Okahandja): Erichsfelde, (-DA), Volk 11925
(M, PRE); Fort Garden Park, Okahandja, (-DD), Giess 15383 (PRE). 2217
(Windhoek): WIN 85, Farm Rietfontein, Granitzersatz, flach, durch
Sickerwasser zeitweise feucht bis nass, (-CA), Volk 01160 (BOL, PRE).
BOTSWANA. — 2127 (Francistown): Shashe Dam, 30 km S of Francis-
town, damp soil in sandy wash, ( — DA), Cl. Reid & Barker 14 (PRE).
TRANSVAAL. — 2229 (Waterpoort): Farm Driehoek, on top of sand-
stone koppie, on sandy soil, (-DC), Fourie 31 (PRE); Lokovhela 793 Farm,
campsite near Zwarthoek boundary, near edge of abandoned Eucalyptus
plantation, on well-drained sand/gravel overlying Waterberg sandstone,
(-DD), Glen 2650 (PRE). 2230 (Messina): Maname, on soil, (-CD), A.E.
van Wyk 5424 (PRE). 2329 (Pietersburg): Soutpansberg, Koedoesvlei 47
Farm, Lejuma, foot of krantzes, stony soil overlying Waterberg quartzite,
(-AB), Glen 2190 (PRE); Pietersburg, Farm Bloedrivier, 696LR, on ground
in open patches, (-CD), F. Venter 12229 (PRE). 2330 (Tzaneen): Mountain
Home Farm, Woodbush, in exposed positions on southern slopes, (-CC),
Mogg CH 3172 (PRE). 2331 (Phalaborwa): Silonque, in large colonies, in
open areas on loamy soil, weakly drained, (-CC), I.M. Retief246 (PRE).
2428 (Nylstroom): Loubad, on road between Nylstroom and Alma, near
bridge over Sand River, on soil between flat rock outcrops above river,
(-CA), S.M. Perold 820 (PRE). 2429 (Zebediela): Chuniespoort, (-BC), F.
van der Merwe CH 3666 (PRE). 2430 (Pilgrim's Rest): Bourke's Luck
Potholes, 27 km N of Graskop on R532 road, (-DB ), S.M. Perold 412 (PRE);
on R532 road to Bourke’s Luck Potholes, ± 1 km before coming to SADF
Dog Training Centre, on dry sandy slope above stream, between grass,
(-DB), S.M. Perold 2702 (PRE). 2528 (Pretoria): Soutpan road, on sandy
soil between grass, (-CA), Odendaal CH 12611 (PRE); Pretoria, (-CA),
Wager CH 3819 (PRE); Zwavelpoort, near Willows road. (-CA). Watson
PRE 56943 ; Magaliesberg, summit Boekenhoutskloof, sandy flats, (-CB),
Mogg CH 853 (PRE); Pienaarspoort, (-CB), Wager CH 852 (PRE);
Donkerpoort, (-CD), Bottomley CH 3566 (PRE). Bottomley & Doidge CH
3590 (PRE); Donkerhoek, 22.5 km E of Pretoria, along Pretoria- Witbank
Freeway, just beyond road cutting, seepage area, (-CD), M. Crosby 464
(PRE), Germishuizen 5624 (PRE), S.M. Perold 330. 2015. 2795. 2796. 2884
(PRE); open veld east of Premier Mine, (-DA), Pole Evans s.n. (T.R. Sim
Herb. 1 826) (PRE); BronkhorstspruitDist., 19kmNoftownonGroblersdal
road, at left hand side of road on soil overlying base of granite, (-DC), S.M.
Perold 144 (PRE); 33 km E of Pretoria, on R5 1 5 road to Cullinan/Bapsfont-
ein, rock outcrop next to road, at small streamlet on damp soil beneath grass,
(-DC), S.M. Perold 1371 (PRE); between Cullinan and Bapsfontein on
R515 road, just after T-junction from Rhenosterfontein, rock outcrop next
to road, (-DC ), S.M. Perold 2010 (PRE); near Bronkhorstspruit, (-DC), leg.
not known, CH 3566a (PRE). 2529 (Witbank): Triegaardts Poort, (-CA),
Verdoom CH 3759 (PRE); Middelburg, along extension of Noordkant
Street, W of town, on hill next to road, (-CB), Van Rooy & Perold 644. 645
(PRE); on road from Middelburg to township, sandstone, on slope opposite
Olifants River, (-CB), Volk 81/015 (BOL, M, PRE); Witbank, on soil,
(-CD). Reinet Smit s.n. (PRE); Middelburg, Gravel Krantz, (-CD), Van der
Merwe CH 214 (type of E. megastomata), CH 3657. CH 3665 (PRE). 2530
(Lydenburg): halfway between Dullstroom and Lydenburg, Farm Klipsteen,
seepage area, on gravel overlying quartzite, near path, (-AB), H. Anderson
1244 (PRE); 29 km from Dullstroom on road R540 from Lydenburg, at dirt
road turnoff to Boschhoek, near Marmerkop Station, on soil on hillside,
(-AB), S.M. Perold 422 (PRE); south of Lydenburg, Spitskop, on
Coromandel Farm (opposite side to homesteads), on soil on dry ledge above
waterfall, (-AB), Perold & Koekemoer 2872 (PRE); Hendriksdal, on dry
rocky veld, (-BB), Young (type of E. youngii). 2628 (Johannesburg):
Benoni, Farrarmere, on soil at rocky outcrop near Homestead Lake, (-AB ),
S.M. Perold 461 (PRE); 5 km NE of Kriel on road to Vanwyksdrift, beyond
old bridge, coarse rock outcrop, (-BB), S.M. Perold 2477 (PRE). 2629
(Bethal): 5 km W of Kriel on road to Vandyksdrift, on left side of road, on
soil in depression at flat rocks, (-AB), S.M. Perold 348 (PRE). 2630
(Carolina): Carolina, (-AA), Van der Merwe CH 3583 (PRE); Knock Dhu
Farm, 1 3 km SE of Lake Chrissie on Lothair road, common on rich black
loamy soil, in grassland, (-AD), Germishuizen 2839. 2887 (PRE).
NATAL. — 2732 (Ubombo): Zululand, Muzi swamp near Phelandaba
Cash Store, south of foot-and-mouth barrier, sedge meadow, in bare
patches overlain by coarse sand, (-BA), Cl. Reid 1024 (PRE). 3030 (Port
Shepstone): Lynton Farm, N of east end of Oribi Gorge, overlooking
Umzimkulu River. ± 2 km W of ‘Rock of Gibraltar’, on stony soil
overlying Natal Mountain sandstone, (-CB), Glen 2243 (PRE).
O.F.S. — 2627 (Potchefstroom): Sasolburg, on soil, (-DD), Kroon s.n.
(PRE). 2828 (Bethlehem): 14 km E of Paul Roux on road to Bethlehem,
at flat weathered sandstone rocks, on soil, (-AC), S.M. Perold 1349
(PRE). 2925 (Jagersfontein): Fauresmith, Pasture Research Station,
(-CB), Henrici CH 11226 (PRE). 2926 (Bloemfontein): grassveld in
University grounds, Bloemfontein, (-AA), Van Zinderen Bakker 7494
(BOL).
CAPE. — 2724 (Taung): Farm Zoetvlei, ± 50 km W of Vryburg and 6
km from turnoff on road to Louwna, 50 m W of pan, on higher ground,
with Riccia volkii, (-AA), M. Crosby 1115 (PRE); Vryburg, Heuningvlei
Salt Pan, west of town, in shallow damp hollow, occasional, (-AA),
Oliver 1446 (BOL). (A Wager bequest, PRE CH 3839, is said to be from
Stellenbosch, but this is surely a mistaken locality, as Exormotheca holstii
has not otherwise been recorded in the southwestern Cape).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I wish to thank Professors S. Jovet-Ast and T. Poes for
refereeing this article and for their helpful suggestions;
also Prof. Dr O.H. Volk, Wurzburg, for the loan of his
specimens and for fruitful discussions and Dr T. Bomefeld
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
23
for chromosome counts. The curators of BOL, G and NY
are thanked for the loan of type specimens. My thanks
also to my colleagues at NBI for collecting specimens, to
the artist, Ms A. Pienaar, the typist, Mrs J. Mulvenna and
the photographer, Mrs A. Romanowski, for their valued
contributions.
REFERENCES
ARNELL. S.W. 1953a. Notes on South African Elepaticae. Revue
Bryologique et Lichenologique XXII, fasc. 1-2.
ARNELL, S.W. 1953b. A new South African species of Exormotheca.
Transactions of the British Bryological Society 2: 283, 284.
ARNELL, S.W. 1963. Hepaticae of South Africa. Swedish Natural Sci-
ence Council, Stockholm.
BEST, E.B. 1990. Bryophyta of Zimbabwe — an annotated checklist.
Kirkia 13:293-318/
BISCHLER, H. 1976. Exormotheca pustulosa Mitten. Revue Bryo-
logique et Lichenologique 42: 769-783.
BISCHLER. H. & JOVET-AST, S. 1981. The biological significance of
morphological characters in Marchantiales (Hepaticae). The
Bryologist 84: 208-215.
BIZOT, M. & POCS. T. 1979. East African Bryophytes III. Acta Botanica
Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 25: 223-261.
DOUIN, C. & TRABUT, L. 1919. Deux Hepatiques peu connues. Revue
generate de Botanique 31: 321-328.
FREY, W. & KURSCHNER. H. 1988. Bryophytes of the Arabian Penin-
sula and Socotra. Nova Hedwigia 46: 37-120.
GOEBEL, K.I. 1905. Zur Kenntnis der Verbreitung und der Lebensweise
der Marchantiaceen-Gattung Exormotheca. Flora 95: 244—250.
GRADSTEIN, S.R.. POCS, T. & VANA, J. 1983. Disjunct hepaticae in
tropical America and Africa. Acta Botanica Hungarica 29: 127-
171.
GROLLE, R. 1983. Nomina generica Hepaticarum. references, types and
synonymies. Acta Botanica Fennica 121: 1-62.
HASSEL DE MENENDEZ, G.G. 1962. Estudio de las Anthocerotales y
Marchantiales de la Argentina. Opera Lilloana 7: 1-297.
KASHYAP, S.R. 1914. Morphological and biological notes on new and
little-known West Himalayan liverworts. II. New Phytologist 13:
308-323.
LINDBERG, S.O. & ARNELL, H.W. 1884. Sandea et Myriorrhynchus,
nova hepaticarum genera. Acta Soc. pro fauna et flora Fennica
2,5: 1-9.
MARQUAND, C.V.B. 1930. XXVI. A new species of Exormotheca from
South Africa. Kew Bulletin 1930: 237-239.
MEIJER, W. 1956. A new species of Exormotheca from Ceylon. Journal
of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 16: 12-1 A.
MITTEN, W. 1870. Hepaticae. In F.C. Godman. Natural history of the
Azores or Western Islands'. 316-328. Van Voorst, London.
MULLER, K. 1906-1912. Die Lebermoose. Dr L. Rabenhorst's Krypto-
gamen-Flora 6: 1-870.
MULLER, K. 1940. Exormothecaceae. Die Lebermoose Europas. Dr L.
Rabenhorst’s Kryptogamen-Flora 6: 275-280.
MULLER. K. 1941. Beitrage zur Systematik der Lebermoose II.
Hedwigia 80: 90-118.
MULLER, K. 1951-1958. Die Lebermoose Europas. Dr L. Rabenhorst’s
Kryptogamen-Flora 6: 417^171.
PEROLD, S.M. 1991. Studies in the genus Riccia (Marchantiales) from
southern Africa. 23. R. bullosa : typification and a full description.
Bothalia 21: 129-135.
SCHIFFNER. V.F. 1893-1895. Hepaticae. Die Nattirlichen Pflanzen-
f ami lien 1: 3-141.
SCHIFFNER, V.F. 1942. Monographic der Gattung Exormotheca.
Hedwigia 8 1 : 40-74.
SOLMS-LAUBACH, H. 1897. liber Exormotheca Mitten, eine wenig
bekannte Marchantiaceengattung. Botanische Zeitung 55: 1-16.
STEPHANI. F. 1899. Species hepaticarum. Bulletin de THerbier Boissier
7: 198-225.
STEPHANI, F. 1917. Species hepaticarum. Bulletin de THerbier Boissier
6: 18.
VOLK. O.H. 1979. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Lebermoose (Marchan-
tiales) aus Siidwestafrika (Namibia). 1. Mitteilungen der Bota-
nischen Staatssammlung, Miinchen 15: 223-242.
VOLK. O.H., PEROLD, S.M. & BORNEFELD, T. 1988. Studies in the
genus Riccia (Marchantiales) from southern Africa. 10. Two new
white-scaled species of the group ‘Squamatae’: R. argenteo-
limbata and R. albomata. Bothalia 18: 155-163.
*
Bothalia 24,1: 25-30(1994)
Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae). XIV. Notes on the genus Erica
E.G.H. OLIVER* and INGE M. OLIVER*
Keywords: Erica, nomenclature, southern Africa, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
Recent investigations of all the recorded southern African species of Erica have been undertaken to establish the characters
of importance in generic delimitation in the subfamily Ericoideae. As a result several anomalies have been found in the
circumscription and identification of certain species and in the nomenclature of others. The corrections and alterations are
published here.
U1TTREKSEL
Ondersoeke van al die bekende Suider-Afrikaanse Erica-spesies is onlangs onderneem om die kenmerke wat belangrik is
vir generiese afbakening in die subfamilie Ericoideae te bepaal. Verskeie ongerymdhede het in die omskrywing en identifikasie
van sekere spesies en in die nomenklatuur van ander aan die lig gekorn. Die aanpassings en veranderinge word hier gepubliseer.
INTRODUCTION
The last full revision of the southern African members
of the genus Erica was provided in Flora capensis by
Guthrie & Bolus ( 1905). Subsequently numerous new spe-
cies have been added by many workers with a major con-
tribution being the abbreviated revision of the genus by
Duller in 1965. In this work Duller did much to sort out
the nomenclature and references to our species in the lit-
erature. Unfortunately he did not examine the complete
collections in any of the major herbaria housing material
from southern Africa, namely BM, BOL, K, NBG, PRE
and STE. His revision also lacked descriptions of the spe-
cies.
Since the revision by Guthrie & Bolus (1905) some
180 additional species have been added which has made
it increasingly difficult to gain an overall view of the
genus. Within recent years we have come across anoma-
lies in the circumscription of certain species, in the appli-
cation of names and in the identification of certain
collections. These records and observations are rational-
ized and published in this paper.
OVARY COMPLEMENT
The genus Erica is generally characterized by having
a 4-locular, many ovuled ovary that forms a dehiscent
capsule. Guthrie & Bolus (1905) recorded that the ovary
was mostly 4-celled, very rarely 8-celled. They noted
under the species treatments that the 8-celled condition
occurred in only E. perspicua Wendl. and E. verticillata
Berg, and 4—8 in E. propendens Andrews.
During our detailed examination of all 657 species of
Erica, several additions to this list of species having non-
standard ovaries have been recorded:
* Stellenbosch Herbarium, National Botanical Institute. P.O. Box 471,
Stellenbosch 7599.
MS. received: 1993-03-31.
E. macowanii Cufino
This species is very closely related to E. perspicua. but
was distinguished by Guthrie & Bolus as having a 4-loc-
ular ovary. Examination of an isotype in BOL and numer-
ous recent collections has shown that the ovary is always
8-locular. The species is, in fact, very difficult to distin-
guish from E. perspicua.
E. colorans Andrews
This species is also closely related to E. perspicua and
has been found to have 4— 6-locular ovaries.
E. annectens Guthrie & Bolus
This species, which is endemic to the Cape Peninsula,
was not recorded by either Guthrie & Bolus (1905) or
Salter (1950) as having an 8-locular ovary.
E. pinea Thunb.
The ovary complement of this species was never men-
tioned by Guthrie & Bolus so we presume they regarded
it as having the standard 4-locular ovary. We have found
the species has 8-locular ovaries, but some collections
from the Hermanus area exhibit 6-locular ovaries.
E. trichophora Benth./E. octonaria L. Bolus/E. dulcis L.
Bolus
This group of species which forms a complex with E.
perspicua Wendl. and E. propendens Andrews, all possess
8-locular ovaries. Esterhuysen (1963) placed E. dulcis in
synonymy under E propendens and Dulfer (1965) dis-
cussed most of the above species as very closely related
under E. perspicua.
26
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
CORRECTIONS AND ALTERATIONS OF NAMES
Erica alexandri
Until recently this species was known from only three
collections from sandy flats in the Paarl area: the type
collection by Alexander- Prior of 1847, a second collection
of his in K, not cited in Guthrie & Bolus (1905) and a
third one by F.H. Cooper in 1922. The spread of farms
and pine plantations has destroyed almost all natural veg-
etation on sandy flats in the area. Searches for the species
in likely places in the Paarl area have not met with suc-
cess.
The species was, however, recently found growing in
a wetland near the Wemmershoek sawmill east of Groot
Drakenstein towards Fransch Hoek. These plants match
those of Alexander-Prior and Cooper exactly and are the
only known surviving population of the species.
E. alexandri is strikingly similar to E. acockii , which
is known only from a few collections made in the 1930’s
from the Brackenfell/Kraaifontein area and is listed as ex-
tinct in the South African Red Data Book (Hall & Veld-
huis 1988). It has not been found since, in spite of
searches of the area, including the type locality, pointed
out to one of us (EGHO) by Acocks in 1965. It must be
assumed that the species has been destroyed by housing
development and alien acacias.
E. acockii grew in very similar conditions to E. al-
exandri, namely sandy flats with some indication of water
seepage just below the surface. This factor may be rele-
vant to the fact that both species flower(ed) in the driest
months of the year, February through to early May. The
localities of the current and former populations of the two
species are only about 40 km apart.
Morphologically the two species are very similar de-
spite the fact that they were placed in two different sec-
tions in the genus, E. alexandri in section Pachysa and
E. acockii in Section Pseuderemia. Both have heads of
mauvish pink sticky flowers with manifest dark anthers,
long gland-tipped hairs on the leaves, stems, pedicels,
bracts, bracteoles and sepals. There are only some slight
differences between the collections from the two areas.
The only clear difference lies in the leaves of E. acockii
which are shorter and more rounded than those of E. al-
exandri. Surprisingly the type collection of E. acockii has
obovoid-obconical corollas with more erect lobes as op-
posed to the urceolate corollas with spreading to reflexed
lobes in the other collections of E. acockii and of E. al-
exandri.
With only one measurable difference between the two
species coupled to the spatial separation of the popula-
tions, we believe that recognition of E. acockii at subspe-
cific level is warranted.
Erica alexandri Guthrie & Bolus in Flora capensis
4: 195 (1905); Duller: 98 (1965).
subsp. alexandri. Type: Paarl Div.; sandy flats
below Paarl Mountain, Alexander 17 (K, holo.!; BOL
fragm.!).
subsp. acockii (Compton) E.G.H. Oliv., stat. et
comb. nov.
E. acockii Compton: 43 (1934); Dulfer: 111 (1965). Type:
Stellenbosch Dist.; Brackenfell, Acocks [Acock] 1319 (BOL, holo.!; K!,
S!, STE!).
Erica auriculata/E. greyi
Both these species were based on a single specimen
and published in the same work (Guthrie & Bolus 1905).
The type of E. auriculata had only a few flowers which
were still in bud, and according to the authors, anther
appendages unlike any other species. On account of its
puberulous flowers Guthrie & Bolus (1905) placed the
species in Section Ephebus. The type of E. greyi had nu-
merous flowers in 6-8-flowered heads, and the authors
made no reference to any distinctive feature of the anthers.
They placed it in Section Pseuderemia.
Comparison of the two types showed that their anthers
are identical. Other characters of flowers and vegetative
parts also matched, and there is no doubt that the two
collections belong to the same species.
No other collections of these two species have been
made and a search for them in the more exact locality
given by Schlechter has not produced any plants. Unfor-
tunately the whole area was burnt in 1991 and thus it will
be several years before further searches will be worth un-
dertaking as it would appear that the plants are reseeders.
Erica greyi Guthrie & Bolus in Flora capensis 4:
231 (1905); Dulfer: 110 (1965). Type: Ceres Div.; Cold
Bokkeveld, Grey 658 (K, holo.!; BOL, fragm.!).
E. auriculata Guthrie & Bolus: 1 19 ( 1905); Dulfer: 68 (1965). Type:
Ceres Div.; on the Skurfde Bergen near Klein Valley, 5800 ft, Schlechter
10207 (BOL, holo.!).
Erica cerviciflora/E. sphenanthera
Both of these species have been known only from the
type collections. They were both placed in Section
Didymanthera on their possession of long tubular flowers
with exserted anthers. An examination of these collections
has shown characters not previously noted in assessing
their true relationships, namely the shape of the anthers
with minute decurrent appendages and fringed corolla
lobes. These characters allied the two species to E.
grandiflora which is highly variable in the position of its
anthers which may be included to exserted even further
than other species of Section Didymanthera.
There are clearly no characters to separate the above
two species from the older E. grandiflora and so they are
here reduced to synonymy under the older epithet.
Erica grandiflora L. /., Supplementum plantarum
: 223 (1782); Benth.: 628 (1839); Guthrie & Bolus: 57
(1905). E. exsurgens Andr. var. grandiflora (L. f.) Dulfer:
35 (1965). Type: Cape, Thunberg s.n. (UPS!).
E. cerviciflora Salish. : 362 (1802); Benth.: 664 (1839); Guthrie &
Bolus: 53 (1905); Dulfer: 33 (1965). Type: Hottentots Holland, Mulder
s.n. (K, holo.!).
E. sphenanthera Tausch: 626 (1834); Guthrie & Bolus: 52 (1905);
Dulfer: 33 (1965). Type: without locality or collector (PRAG, holo.!).
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
27
Erica esterhuyseniae
When Compton described this species he provided a
Latin diagnosis and full English description, but did not
cite a type. However, he stated that there were clearly two
distinct varieties, var. a tetramera and var. b trimera, for
which he provided the diagnoses and holotypes. Accord-
ing to the current Code this would automatically imply
that there was a typical variety var. esterhuyseniae with
the same type as the species name.
Compton’s application of the term ‘Var. a’ would sug-
gest that he intended this variety to be the typical variety
but that he supplied the incorrect epithet for it. We are
therefore replacing Compton’s name with the correct au-
tonym and regarding the holotype of his var. tetramera as
the type of the species name.
Erica esterhuyseniae Compton in Journal of South
African Botany 7: 193 (1941); Dulfer: 75 (1965). Type:
Uniondale Div., Kamanassieberg (Mannetjieberg), 1 700
m, 1 Feb. 1941, Compton 10557 (NBG!).
var. esterhuyseniae [as var. a tetramera ]
var. trimera Compton: 193 (1941); Dulfer: 75 (1965). Type: Oudts-
hoorn Div., Swartberg Pass, 2 000 m, 28 Jan. 1941, Bond 866 (NBG!).
Erica filiformis
Guthrie & Bolus (1905) recorded the species as having
a variable number of stamens, namely usually 8 but often
7-4. They noted that 4-stamened specimens were 'tech-
nically Blaeria and not Erica'. In a recent paper (Oliver
1993) this species was discussed in detail in connection
with the relationship between Erica and Blaeria. An ex-
amination of all the available collections of E. filiformis
showed that some collections have 4-stamened flowers,
others 8-stamened flowers, with only one collection show-
ing any intermediate numbers.
In the same work Bolus (1905) described the variety,
var. maritima Bolus, from a single collection made in the
Agulhas area. An examination of the type showed that the
4-stamened flowers look superficially very similar to those
of E. filiformis, but do not possess the 4-locular. multi-
ovuled ovary typical of Erica. Instead the flowers have
2-, rarely 1 -locular ovaries with a single ovule per locule,
a feature characteristic of certain minor genera. The ma-
terial was in fact an isosyntype of Acrostemon schlechteri
N.E. Br.!
The synonymy is therefore as follows:
Acrostemon schlechteri N.E. Br. in Flora capensis
4: 353 (1906). Types: Bredasdorp Div.; Rhenosterkop, 50
ft., Schlechter 10576 (BM!, BOL!, G!, GRA!, K!, Z!);
Cape Agulhas, 250 ft., Schlechter 10559 (BM!. BOL!, G!,
GRA!, K!, MO!, P!, PRE!, S!, W!, Z!); lectotype still to
be chosen.
Erica filifonnis Salisb. var. maritima Bolus: 150 (1905). Type:
Bredasdorp Div.; hills near Cape Agulhas, 250 ft, Schlechter 10559
(BOL, holo.!).
Erica gillii
Until recently the type at Kew was the only known
collection of this species with none apparently occurring
in southern African herbaria. Various recent collections,
Oliver 4127, Schumann 793 and Vlok 2499, made in the
Attaquas Kloof area have turned out to be this species
when compared with the type. Also an investigation of
the type sheet of Erica rhodantha Guthrie & Bolus in
Section Polycodon showed that two collections were
mounted on the sheet, one being the type, Galpin 3706,
from Garcia’s Pass and the other being a collection of E.
gillii , Bolus 11339, also from Garcia’s Pass. A duplicate
of the Bolus collection turned out to be included with E.
rhodantha in STE. The two species are superficially very
similar, but may be distinguished on their anthers, black
with a large apical ridge in E. gillii. typical of the Section
Melastemon, versus brown and not ridged in E. rhodantha.
This latter species was also poorly represented in herbaria
with, surprisingly, only a few old collections from the
Garcia's Pass, an area which has been very well collected.
It has also recently been turned up on the lowest northern
slopes of the Langeberg west of Garcia’s Pass (Oliver
10242).
Erica gillii Benth. in De Candolle, Prodromus 7:
684 (1839); Guthrie & Bolus: 302 (1905); Dulfer: 136
(1965). Type: Attaquaskloof, Gill s.n. (K, holo.!).
Erica leptostachya
The type and only authentic material attributable to this
name came from the cultivated collections of William
MacNab. Many of MacNab's collections of heaths culti-
vated in Edinburgh in the early 1800's were known to
have originated from material collected at the Cape, par-
ticularly through the efforts of James Niven. So when de-
scribing this species Guthrie & Bolus noted ‘though its
origin is somewhat uncertain, it is most probably South
African’. A close examination of the fragment of the type
in BOL showed that the material identified in herbaria as
E. leptostachya did not match the type which was recog-
nized as being identical to specimens in STE of the Eu-
ropean species, Erica scoparia L. This species is charac-
terized by small, creamish green, wind-pollinated flowers
with large red stigmas. The flowers are borne on absolute
brachyblasts in the axils of foliage leaves up the main
branches, thus giving the appearance of a pseudoraceme.
Dulfer (1965) identified two sheets of unlocalized ma-
terial in W as clearly belonging to this species, but also
did not realise the European connection.
Therefore E. leptostachya Guthrie & Bolus becomes a
taxonomic synonym of E. scoparia L.
Erica scoparia L., Species plantarum edn 1, 1: 353
(1753); Benth.: 692 (1839); Dulfer: 149 (1965); D.A.
Webb & Rix: 8 ( 1972); D.C. McClint.: 286 (1989) et auct.
mult. Type: species still to be lectotypified.
E. leptostachya Guthrie & Bolus: 217 (1905); Dulfer: 105 (1965).
Type: South Africa?, without note of origin. Herb. MacNab 405a. 109
(K, holo.!).
28
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
Dulfer (1963) described a variety of Guthrie & Bolus’
species as var. glabra Dulfer, based on a recent collection
from Mariepskop in the Transvaal. He noted that his type
material had originally been identified as E. leucopelta
Tausch var. ephebioides Bolus. Bolus’ type also came
from Mariepskop, as do the type and paratype of another
species described by Dulfer, E. merxmuelleri Dulfer. The
specimens of the latter species appear to us to be E.
natalitia Bolus.
Dulfer’s taxon can clearly not be part of the European
E. scoparia. Until such time as we can sort out the tax-
onomic problems of the E. leucopelta/natalitia/ merx-
muelleri complex this variety must be left unplaced, if
indeed it is a sound taxon.
Erica longisepala ^
When describing E. longisepala , Guthrie & Bolus
( 1905) placed it in the long-tubed Section Pleurocallis and
allied it to E. grandiflora. They commented that the spe-
cies was a link between the Sections Pleurocallis and
Hermes. Both of these sections are characterised by a
pseudospicate inflorescence and are separated only on the
size of the flowers. Guthrie & Bolus noted that their spe-
cies was related to E. parilis Salisb. in Section Hermes.
Since their publication much material of E. parilis and
E. longisepala has been collected which shows a consid-
erable amount of variability in the size of the flowers from
as short as 5 mm up to 25 mm. There is no clear demar-
cation of a boundary between the two species. Es-
terhuysen (1963) noted that these two species were
synonymous, but Dulfer (1965) did not follow this. We
confirm Esterhuysen’s opinion with the following synon-
ymy.
Erica parilis Salisb. in Transactions of the Linnean
Society 6: 371 (1802); Benth.: 664 (1839); Guthrie &
Bolus: 209 (1905); Dulfer: 102 (1965); Esterhuysen: 57
(1963). Type: Hottentots Holland, Masson s.n. (BM,
holo.!).
E. longisepala Guthrie & Bolus: 57 ( 1905); Dulfer: 36 ( 1965). Type:
Clanwilliam Div.; without precise locality, Maders.n. (SAM, holo.!).
Erica minutissima
An examination of a portion of the type which Bolus
fortunately acquired from Berlin has revealed that the
specimen is a monstrosity having a double calyx, no co-
rolla and no stamens. Bolus noted on his sheet that there
were two sheets of this 'species’ in Berlin, labelled as
locality 83, ‘Stellenbosch Umgebung Somerset West’. In
BOL there is a collection of Zeyher (?Ecklon) which
matches the Berlin fragment exactly, but is labelled as
moist places at Bloemendal. The material in our opinion
is referrable to E. quadrangularis which occurs sporadi-
cally in the area and which must have been very common
before the spread of housing and farms.
Erica quadrangularis Salisb., Prodromus 297
(1796); Guthrie & Bolus: 182 (1905); Dulfer: 93 (1965).
E. quadraejlora Salisb.: 375 (1802); Benth.: 679 (1839),
nom. illegit. Type: in Promontorio Cap, Jac. Mulder s.n.
(K, holo.!).
E. minutissima Klotzsch ex Benth.: 691 (1839);
Guthrie & Bolus: 223 (1905); Dulfer: 107 (1965). Type:
in montibus Hottentots Holland, Ecklon & Zeyher s.n. (B,
holo.f; BOL, fragm.!).
Erica monadelphia
The name of this species is problematic in having no
relevance to the species. The anthers of the species are
not joined together into one unit as they so clearly are in
the anomalous E. embothriifolia Salisb.
There has been much confusion with the publication
dates of Andrews’ species, particularly those in the first
volume of his folio edition. Coloured engravings of
heaths, which appeared in the four bound volumes pub-
lished from 1802 onwards. This led Dulfer (1965) to
change the authorship, as given by Bentham (1839) and
Guthrie & Bolus (1905), from Andrews (1802) to
Willdenow (1799).
Andrews produced his first drawings in separate parts
of three loose plates each, before he had them bound as
the first volume. Some, but unfortunately not all, of the
plates in the first volume of his work are dated. Recently
an excellent set of the first 22 parts of his Coloured en-
gravings was found in the library of the Farm Vergelegen,
Somerset West. From this set the publication date of E.
monadelphia was June 1, 1797 in part 8. A note on the
Andrews’ publications on heaths is being prepared for
publication.
Erica monadelphia Andrews, Coloured engravings
of heaths, part 8 (1797); Willd.: 396 (1799); Benth.: 622
(1839); Guthrie & Bolus: 51 (1905); Dulfer: 32 (1965).
Type: Andrews: t. 38 (1797).
Erica newdigatei
Due to an earlier homonym, the name of this species
had to be changed. Dulfer chose to commemorate one of
the collectors mentioned by Guthrie & Bolus ( 1905), Miss
Caroline Newdigate (1857-1937) of Forest Hall,
Plettenberg Bay. Thus Dulfer’s use of the masculine end-
ing ‘newdigatei’ must be corrected.
Erica newdigateae Dulfer in Annalen des Natur-
historischen Museums Wien 68: 138 (1965). E. longipes
Klotzsch ex Benth.: 684 (1839), non Bartl. (1832) [= E.
coarctata Wendl. var. longipes (Bartl.) Bolus]; Guthrie &
Bolus: 306 (1905). Type: in hills at Grasrugg [Grasrug?],
Uitenhage, Ecklon & Zeyher s.n. (B, holo.f; ?iso.).
Erica priorii
Until recently this species was known only from the
type collection in Kew, collected by Alexander-Prior near
George in 1847. Some recent collections, Vlok 1120 &
Schumann 590 from Karatara Forest Reserve, were com-
pared with the type and found to be this species. Subse-
quently a collection made by Keet in 1920 from Spitzkop,
Knysna and placed under incertae and one by Taylor from
the Outeniqua Pass in 1962 placed under E. coarctata
Wendl., have been found to be this species.
Bothalia 24, 1 (1994)
29
The fresh material from Vlok has shown us that the
species is a distinct one favouring moist, humic, condi-
tions on steep, southern slopes of the Outeniqua Moun-
tains. The shrubs grow to 1.2 m tall and bear bright pink
flowers in dense pseudospikes towards the ends of the
branches.
Erica priorii Guthrie & Bolus in Flora capensis 4:
216 (1905); Dulfer: 105 (1965). Type: George Div.; near
George, Alexander s.n. (K, holo.!).
E. recurvata
This name has been maintained in all major revisions
of the family with the citation of no collections from the
wild, only material cultivated in Europe during the early
1800’s. From the scraps of cultivated material available
for us to examine we find that the material is clearly a
lush cultivated form of E. cumuliflora Salisb. with its dis-
tinctive corolla lobes. These lobes are relatively long, sub-
spathulate and suberect forming windows around the base
of the corolla interstices and edged with short hairs in the
window areas. Only two species of Erica possess these
peculiar lobes, E. cumuliflora and E. genistifolia Salisb.
The former has 4-nate leaves and denser heads of 5-12
flowers whereas the latter has 3-nate leaves and fewer
flowers (3-4) per inflorescence.
Erica cumuliflora Salisb. in Transactions of the
Linnean Society 6: 336 (1802); Benth.: 657 (1839);
Guthrie & Bolus: 237 (1905); Dulfer: 112 (1965). Type:
Hottentots Holland. Mulder s.n. (K, holo.!).
E. recurvata Andrews: t. 262 ( 1 809): Lodd. : t. 1093 ( 1 825 ): Bot. Mag.
t. 3427 (1835): Benth.: 657 (1 839); Guthrie & Bolus: 236 (1905); Dulfer:
1 1 2 ( 1 965). Type: Andrews: t. 262 ( 1 809 ).
Erica revoluta/austrovema
When going through the collections of incertae in
BOL, PRE and STE, several specimens were found that
matched two recently described species, the Transvaal ma-
terial being E. revoluta in Section Arsace and the Natal
material being E. austrovema in Section Pyronium. An
additional specimen was found filed under E. woodii
Bolus in Section Chlorocodon. This led to an investigation
of the two species.
The material cited by Davidson (1985) under E. revo-
luta (Bolus) L.E. Davidson and Hilliard & Burtt (1985)
under E. austrovema Hilliard and the additional material
clearly belong to one, variable, widespread species. There
is much variation in the degree of revoluteness of the
leaves and of hairiness on the branches and pedicels and
in the shape of the sepals.
The collections from Natal and Swaziland tend to have
the leaves more revolute and therefore narrower, whereas
most of the collections from the eastern Transvaal have
broad open-backed leaves. However, the type of E.
revoluta. Wilms 908. and Keet STE 16476 have the narrow
leaves of the Natal material and both come from near
Lydenburg.
Erica revoluta (Bolus) L.E. Davidson in Journal of
South African Botany 51: 71 (1985). E. subverticillaris
Diels ex Guthrie & Bolus var. revoluta Bolus: 224 (1905);
Dulfer: 108 (1965). Type: Spitz Kop, near Lydenburg,
Wilms 908 (K, holo.!: BOL!, WU).
E. austrovema Hilliard in Hilliard & B.L. Burtt: 243 (1985). Type:
Natal, Vryheid Dist., Hlobane, 10-09-1950 , Johnstone 433 (NU, holo.!;
E. STE fragm.!).
Erica solandra/setulosa
In 1963 Dulfer described the variety mollis under E.
solandra Andrews based on a collection from Seven
Weeks Poort. We subsequently found material growing on
the Rooiberg in the Little Karoo and realized that the
growth form and habitat were quite unlike those of E.
solandra which is known only from the Outeniqua Moun-
tains near George. Several other collections from the
Seven Weeks Poort area matched Dulfer’s material.
During an investigation of all the species in the Section
Pseuderemia, it was found that a distinct new species
could be described, E. ingecina E.G.H. Oliv. (Oliver &
Oliver 1991) and that Dulfer’s variety was not part of E.
solandra and also constituted a distinct separate species.
Later during our survey of all Erica species the material
attributed to var. mollis was found to match a collection
by Elsie Esterhuysen from the extreme western end of the
Langeberg and which she had tentatively placed under E.
setulosa Benth.
E. setulosa is known only from Bentham’s type in Kew,
a specimen collected without precise locality by Niven in
the 1790’s and fragments of which were given to H. Bolus
and are now housed in BOL. A detailed examination of
these fragments showed that they match the Esterhuysen
collection in most respects. They also indicate that
Dulfer’s variety is indeed E. setulosa.
The placing of E. setulosa under the Section Ephebus
must have been based solely on the possession of the hairy
corolla which fact overlooked the head of flowers similar
to those found in Pseuderemia which also has some spe-
cies in which the corolla is hairy. This clearly indicates a
rather tenuous distinction between the two sections.
Erica setulosa Benth. in De Candolle, Prodromus
7: 682 (1839); Guthrie & Bolus: 123 (1905); Dulfer: 69
(1965). Type: Cape Colony, Niven s.n. (K, holo.; BOL,
fragm.!).
E. solandra Andrews var. mollis Dulfer: 33 (1963); Dulfer: 69 (1965).
Type: Prince Albert Div., Seven Weeks Poort Berg, rocky S. slopes, 5000
ft, 13-10-1955, Esterhuysen 24820 (W, holo.; BOL!, STE!).
Erica turmalis
Salisbury based his E. turmalis on one of the many
collections supposedly made by the enigmatic I. Mulder.
Salisbury is the only botanist to have cited this collector,
as Jac. Mulder (Salisbury 1796) and I. Mulder (Salisbury
1802), but nowhere is there a collection of his labelled as
such. There is no Salisbury material bearing the name
‘ turmalis ’ in either K or BM. Salisbury described his spe-
cies as 4-5-anthered and noted that it had the facies of
his E. bruniifolia. A collection by Mund in K with a frag-
ment in BOL, determined as this species by Bentham. is
clearly part of the E. cordata Andrews complex. Until
such time as an authentic specimen can be located we are
30
Bothalia24.1 (1994)
removing this name from the list of currently accepted
southern African species and placing it in the list of "spe-
cies non satis cognitae .
Erica turmalis Salisb. in Transactions of the Linnean Society 6: 342
(1802); Benth.: 616 (1839); Guthrie & Bolus: 234 (1905); Dulfer: 111
(1965). Type: in Hottentots-Holland, Mulder s.n. (?, holo.).
Erica umbelliflora
This species has remained uncollected since it was de-
scribed in 1839. An examination of the material cited by
Bentham revealed that E. umbelliflora is, in fact, a distinct
and well-known species in the southern Cape and that all
the collections assignable to this species were filed under
two recently described species.
The current sectional subdivision of the genus Erica is
a complex and unfortunately unnatural system which has
led to a number of irrelevant new species being described
(see several cases "cited above). The circumscription of
some of the sections has been rather vague and with the
arbitrary placing of species in these sections true relation-
ships have inevitably been overlooked in the describing
of new taxa. This has been the case with two species, E.
manifesta Compton and E. ionii H.A. Baker.
*
E. umbelliflora was placed by Guthrie & Bolus in the
Section Pachysa because they assumed that the flowers
were viscid. Compton looked in the Section Gypsocallis
for species allied to his E. manifesta on the grounds of
slightly exserted stamens and a pseudospicate inflores-
cence. Baker placed his E. ionii in Section Pyronium on
account of the exserted stamens and terminal flowers. In
all three cases the true relationship of the taxa was not
possible to ascertain because of their diverse placement
in the genus.
The variability of the flowers is such that they may be
viscid because of the glands on the calyx, may have in-
cluded to exserted stamens and have the flowers arranged
from terminal on short lateral branchlets to aggregated in
a pseudospicate arrangement.
Later Baker (1970) recognized that his species was
synonymous with Compton’s species, but overlooked the
relationship with E. umbelliflora. The synonymy of the
species is thus:
Erica umbelliflora Klotzsch ex Benth. in De Can-
dolle, Prodromus 7: 659 (1839); Guthrie & Bolus: 197
( 1905); Dulfer: 98 ( 1965). Types: in monte Zwartberg ad
Attaquaskloof et flumen Calutso, Masson s.n. et Drege
s.n. (lectotype still to be chosen).
E. manifesta Compton: 37 (1935); Dulfer: 84 (1965). Type: Uni-
ondale Dist.; hills northeast of Avontuur, 3100 ft. Sept. 1932, Fourcade
4606 (BOL, holo.!).
E. ionii H.A. Baker: 148 ( 1965); Dulfer: 86 (1965). Type: Uniondale
Div. On sandy slopes on Potjieskloof Pass beside the National Road from
George to Uniondale at about 900 m ( 3000 ft). Baker 2330 (BOL, holo. ! ).
REFERENCES
ANDREWS, H.C. 1794— 71830. Coloured engravings of heaths. London.
BAKER. H.A. 1965. Notes on some species of Erica, with descriptions of
three new species and two new species and two new varieties.
Journal of South African Botany 31: 145-161 .
BAKER, H.A. 1970. Taxonomic notes on Erica. Journal of South African
Botany 36: 267-270.
BARTLING. T.F. 1832. Plantae Ecklonianae, Ericaceae. Linnaea 7: 627-
652.
BENTHAM, G. 1839. Ericaceae. In A.P De Candolle, Prodromus sys-
tematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 7: 580-733. Paris.
BOLUS, H. 1905. Erica. Flora capensis 4,1: 4—315. Reeve, London.
BROWN, N.E. 1906. Ericaceae. Flora capensis 4,1: 315-336. Reeve,
London.
COMPTON, R.H. 1934. Erica acockii. Journal of Botany 72: 43.
COMPTON, R.H. 1935. Plantae novae africanae. Series IV. Journal of
South African Botany 1: 37-39.
COMPTON, R.H. 1941 . Plantae novae africanae. Series XVII. Journal of
South African Botany 7: 193-207.
DAVIDSON, L.E. 1985. A change in status for Erica subverticillaris var.
revoluta from the eastern Transvaal. South African Journal of
Botany 51:71-73.
DULFER. H. 1963. Neue Arten und Varietaten der Gattung Erica L. aus
Siidafrika. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien 66:
19-33.
DULFER. H. 1965. Revision der siidafrikanischen Arten der Gattung
Erica L. 2. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien 68:
25-177.
ESTERHUYSEN, E. 1963. Notes on South African species of Erica.
Journal of South African Botany 29: 51-58.
GUTHRIE, F. & BOLUS, H. 1905. Erica. Flora capensis 4,1: 4-315.
Reeve, London.
HALL, A.V. & VELDHUIS, H.A. 1988. South African Red Data Book:
plants — Fynbos and Karoo Biomes. South African National Sci-
entific Programmes Report No. 117. CSIR. Pretoria.
HILLIARD, O.M. & BURTT, B.L. 1985. Notes on some plants of south-
ern Africa chiefly from Natal: XL Notes from the Royal Botanic
Gardens Edinburgh 42,2: 227-260.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum edn 1, 1:352-356.
LINNAEUS, C. fil. 1782. Supplementum plantarum. Braunschweig.
LODD1GES, C. 1825. The botanical cabinet: t. 1093.
MCCLINTOCK, D. 1989. The heathers of Europe and adjacent areas.
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 101: 279-289.
OLIVER, E.G.H. & OLIVER. I.M. 1991. Studies in the Ericoideae
(Ericaceae). VIII. New species in Erica, section Pseuderemia,
from southern Africa. Botlialia 21: 137-142.
OLIVER. E.G.H. 1993. Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae). XI. The
generic relationship between Erica and Blaeria. Kew Bulletin 48:
771-780.
SALISBURY, R.A. 1796. Erica. Prodromus : 292-298.
SALISBURY, R.A. 1802. Species of Erica. Transactions of the Linnean
Society’ 6: 316-388.
SALTER, T.M. 1950. Ericaceae. In R.S. Adamson & T.M. Salter, Flora of
the Cape Peninsula: 627-657. Juta, Cape Town.
TAUSCH, J.F. 1834. Bemerkungen tiber Erica. Flora 17: 615-622.
WEBB, D.A. & RIX, E.M. 1972. Erica. In V.H. Heywood, Flora eu-
ropaea 3: 5-8.
WILLDENOW. C.L. 1799. Caroli a Linne species plantarum 2: 396.
Berlin.
Bothalia 24,1: 31-35(1994)
Notes on African plants
VARIOUS AUTHORS
ROSACEAE
CLIFFORTIA LONG1FOL1A. A ‘GOOD' SPECIES OR SHOULD IT BE A VARIETY UNDER C. STROBIL1FERA ?
Ecklon & Zeyher (1836) described a variety of
Cliffortici strobilifera L. and named it var. longifolia , but
pointed out that it might be a separate species. Their type,
Ecklon & Zeyher 1 753B, was observed by the authors as
‘wanting flowers' whereas Weimarck (1933) noted that it
had ‘an abundance of male flowers'.
As the female flowers were not seen by Weimarck
(1933), his decision to raise the taxon to specific level
was based on the differences in the male bracteoles and
the brachyblasts. Observed inconsistencies in Weimarck's
(1933, 1934) descriptions and figures depicting the respec-
tive sizes of the leaf stipules and male bracteoles in C.
longifolia and the indumentum of the male bracteoles in
C. strobilifera , added to the doubt concerning the validity
of such a decision. In fact, the investigation of the male
bracteoles and pedicels in C. strobilifera , revealed a very
similar structure to those in C. longifolia but on a some-
what smaller scale. (Figure 1M & N compared to 1A &
B).
Further confusion was caused by the observed variation
in leaf size and sheath length in C. strobilifera, the larger
forms being difficult to distinguish from C. longifolia on
vegetative characters only.
The investigation of female flowers seemed to be the
only way to settle this question. If the female flowers
should show the same degree of similarity as the male
flowers, differing in size only, the case for raising the sta-
tus of the taxon would be very flimsy. If however, the
female flower and fruit should be markedly different, there
could no longer be room for doubt.
In the search for female flowers, short shoots with ob-
vious male flowers but apparently totally lacking in female
flowers, were removed from herbarium specimens and
softened by boiling and soaking. Successive leaf sheaths
were removed from each short shoot and the axils exam-
ined for flowers.
Each axil contained a single flower and even though
the intact short shoots showed no evidence of the presence
of female flowers, these were in fact found. A single fe-
male flower occurred in the axil of the leaf halfway up
the short shoot, preceded by 3(4) old male flower remains
(pedicels and bracteoles) and followed by a similar group
of young male flowers (buds). Fully matured fruits were
also totally obscured by the leaf sheaths.
With the discovery of the female flowers and fruits of
C. longifolia, the necessity for amendments to the descrip-
tions of both taxa, became obvious.
The specimens of C. strobilifera selected for examina-
tion included the extremes from the small-leafed form nor-
mally regarded as the typical C. strobilifera, to the large-
leafed form that is almost indistinguishable from C. longi-
folia on the vegetative characters only.
Cliffortia longifolia ( Eckl. & Zeyh.) Weim., Mono-
graph of the genus Cliffortia : 144 (1934).
C. strobilifera L. var. longifolia Eckl. & Zeyh. : 271 (1836). Type:
Swellendam: ad llumen Breederivier, Murid s.n. sub Ecklon s.n. ( B t, S!.
lectotype here designated).
Weimark (1934) quoted a Mund collection under
Ecklon & Zeyher 1753B as the type in B and S. The Berlin
specimen was destroyed in the Second World War and the
Stockholm specimen bears no collector’s number. A hand-
written label (not in Weimarck’s handwriting) bearing the
name ‘ Cliffort strobilifera B longifol' and a reprint of
Ecklon & Zeyher’s description of the variety giving the
locality as the Breede River and the collector as Mund.
are attached to the Stockholm specimen. Weimarck seems
to have found these two labels sufficient evidence that the
Stockholm specimen is a duplicate of the Berlin one in
spite of the absence from the Stockholm specimen of the
Ecklon & Zeyher collector’s number.
Leaves : stipules up to 20 mm long, densely shortly
hairy; leaflets 15.0-65.0 x 2. 0-6.0 mm. Male flowers:
pedicel 6.75 mm long with 2.4 mm above upper bracteole
and 2.9 mm below lower bracteole, densely hairy; upper
bracteole 63-6.5 mm long, lower bracteole 9.25-9.50 mm
long, situated 1.45 mm apart on pedicel; receptacle 1.0-
1.25 x 0.65 mm, glabrous; sepals 3, 10.0 x 2.0 mm, (Fig-
ure 1A & B). Female flowers: pedicel 1.6 mm long with
half of its length above upper bracteole, densely hairy ex-
cept for glabrous apical cone (Figure IF & K); bracteoles
7. 0-8.4 mm long, originating one above the other on ped-
icel, basally ovate abruptly narrowing to linear, keel of
basal ovate part and entire linear portion densely hairy,
margin of basal ovate portion glabrous but for a sparsely
ciliate edge (Figure ID & F); sepals 3, 5.0-6. Ox 1 .0—1.2
mm, linear-lanceolate, glabrous (Figure 1C); ovary 2.6 x
1.5 mm. ovate, truncate at both ends, glabrous, irregularly
longitudinally ribbed with 19 (20) low ridges apically
joined to form roughly flattened top bearing staminodes,
ridges basally lost in a somewhat swollen and hollow part
that fits over cone of pedicel, adaxially irregularly grooved
32
Bothalia 24. 1 (1994)
FIGURE 1 . — Cliffortia longijolia. A, ubaxiul \ lew ol male flower (stamens removed): Aa, reeeplacle; Ab & Ad, densely hairy pedicel. B. adaxial
view of male flower, receptacle and calyx removed: Bb. Be, Bd, parts of pedicel. C, female calyx lobes; D, lower female bracteole; E, style
and stigma; F, upper female bracteole attached to pedicel; G, ovary; H, female flower. (D-G in situ). 1, female bracteoles, fruit removed: Ie,
part of pedicel. J, fruit viewed from top. K, top half of densely hairy pedicel: Kf, conical apex. L, fruit: Lg, swollen part, with basal hollow
that fits over cone on pedicel. Cliffortia strobilifera. M, adaxial view of male flower (stamens removed): Ma, glabrous receptacle; Mb, Md.
hairy pedicel. N. abaxial view of male flower, receptacle and calyx removed: Nb. Nc & Nd, parts of pedicel. O, female calyx lobes; P, style
and stigma; Q, fruit, irregularly rugose, top truncate; R, intact female flower and bracteoles. A, B, Burgers 1668 (STE); C-H, Hugo 1800
(STE); I-L, Oliver 8494 (STE); M, Rudatis 999 (STE); N, Thompson 3691 (STE); O-R, Oliver 10053 (STE). Scale bar: 1 mm.
by edges of the bracteoles (Figure 1 G); style solitary, 3. 1
mm long, stigma 3.3 mm long sparsely fimbriate on one
side only (Figure IE). Fruit: 4.0 x 1.5 mm, elliptic, trun-
cate at both ends, longitudinally ridged, without irregular
adaxial groove as seen on ovary, the fruit having devel-
oped beyond bracteoles (Figure 1H, J & L).
Cliffortia strobilifera L., Systema vegetabilium
edn 13 : 749 (1774). Weim. : 140 (1934); auct. mult. Type:
Pluk.: t. 275, fig. 2 (1694).
Although a Plukenet specimen associated with the cited
figure exists under Flerb. Sloane 99: 179, upper right (BM-
SL), this specimen cannot be designated lectotype as it
was never seen by Linnaeus, according to Dr F.R. Barrie
of the Linnaean Plant Name Typification Project (pers.
comm.). The only possible type referred to by Linnaeus
(1774) in his description of the species, is the Plukenet
figure.
Change of author citation
The author of C. strobilifera has always been cited as
J. A. Murray in Systema vegetabilium edn 13: 749 (1774).
Stafleu & Cowan (1981) however, in referring to this doc-
ument, added the following: ‘N.B. The new taxa in this
work must be attributed to Linnaeus; Murray was simply
editor.’
Leaves : vagina 3-9 mm long; stipules 2^1 mm long,
ciliate; leaflets glabrous to hairy all over or on veins only,
10-70 x 1.5-8 mm, linear-lanceolate, base somewhat nar-
rowed to channelled and petiolate, apex acute to tridentate
or with main vein bisecting lamina obliquely. Male flow-
ers: pedicel 1.0-1. 3 mm long, hairy; bracteoles 4.0-4.75
mm long, linear subulate, the lower implanted 0.4 mm
below the upper, keel ciliate; sepals ± 4.0 x 1.0 mm,
linear-lanceolate apiculate, glabrous (Figure 1M & N). Fe-
male flowers: sessile; bracteoles 2.5-3 .5 mm long, lan-
ceolate-linear acuminate, apex sometimes spirally twisted;
sepals 3, 3.0-3. 3 x 0.6-0.8 mm, linear lanceolate, glabrous
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
33
(Figure 10); ovary linear, apex truncate, base cuneate, gla-
brous, irregularly rugose; style solitary, 1 .5 mm long,
stigma 1.5 mm long, fimbriate mainly on one side (Figure
IP) . Fruit: 23-2.4 mm x 0.75-1.0 mm. cuneate linear
truncate, mgose to very obscurely longitudinally ridged,
apex concave giving the appearance of an opening (Figure
IQ) .
Distribution and habitat: C. longifolia occurs in wet-
lands, half-wetlands, swamps, vleis and on streamsides
near the coast, at low altitudes, from Langebaan Lagoon
in the west to the Cape Peninsula, then along the southern
coast to Ystervarkpunt (Gouriqua) near Albertinia ( Figure
2).
C. strobilifera shares the habitat with C. longifolia. but
has a much wider distribution and altitudinal range; the
localities near the Cape southwestern coast are at lower
altitudes than those inland and northerly, which occur as
high as 1 600 m.
DISCUSSION
Some herbarium specimens of C. strobilifera have both
small and large leaves. These are often borne on separate
branches, or the large ones are on long shoots, the small
ones on short shoots, apparently indicating different
growth phases. Field observations confirmed this: the new
season’s growth is represented by a much more robust and
larger long shoot with a thicker stem and larger leaves
than the existing stems and leaves. These leaves also have
the typically soft texture and hairiness of new growth.
Where the larger leaves occur on herbarium specimens of
C. strobilifera , these are always together with smaller
ones, either on the same branch and then with the large
leaves on the long shoot sheathing the short shoots, or on
different branches where the robust branch represents the
new growth referred to above. In contrast, the leaves of
C. longifolia appear homogeneous or at least far less vari-
able in size. The leaves are also of a more robust texture
and the margins thicker.
Whereas most other differences between C. longifolia
and C. strobilifera could very well be dismissed as merely
of degree, the differences in fruit morphology establish C.
longifolia as a separate entity beyond all doubt. C.
longifolia has the clearly marked ribs typical of section
FIGURE 2. — Known distribution of Cliffurtici longifolia.
Costatae, whereas C. strobilifera not only has the
smoother fruit less often encountered in this section, but
the shape of the fruit is also unusual and the concave apex
even more so.
Weimarck (1934) gave the distribution of C. longifolia
as the type locality only. Six years later, Weimarck (1940)
quoted one other collection and extended the range to in-
clude the Cape Peninsula. Later collections filled in the
gap between these two localities and extended the distri-
bution to the west coast.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
C. longifolia
CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): Farm Geelbek, eastern shores,
Langebaan Lagoon, marsh occasionally saline, ± 5 m, 14-08-1975,
(-AA), Boucher 2813 (STE). 3318/3418 (Cape Town/Simonstown):
Cape Peninsula without precise locality, banks of streams, ± 160-320 m,
1887, Thode 9183 (STE). 3419 (Caledon): Ratel River Mouth, 50 m,
07-06-1984, (-DC), O'Callaghan et al. 483 (PRE. STE). 3420
(Bredasdorp): De Hoop-Potberg Nature Reserve, Windhoek, Rietkloof,
damp soil along stream, 10 m, 16-01-1979, (-AD). Burgers 1668 (PRE);
between Noetzie and Elandspad, streamside vegetation, 60 m, 11-04-
1979. (-BC), Hugo 1800 (STE); Potberg area, Hamerkop Resort,
streamside in kloof, 60 m, 19-06-1984, (-BC). Oliver 8494 (PRE. STE).
3421 (Riversdale): Rransfontein Farm, Still Bay, river bank, 30 m,
07-10-1980, (-AD), Bohnen 7730 (PRE, STE); Albertinia, near
Ystervarkpunt, on Gouriqua land, in a marsh, on gentle south-facing
slope, in coastal fynbos, 10 m, 18-02-1989, (-BC), Vlok 2098 (PRE);
Albertinia, Ystervarkpunt (Gouriqua), along stream, 25 m, 18-03-1987,
(-BD), Willemse 150 (PRE. STE).
C. strobilifera
Robust form
NATAL. — 2930 (Pietermaritzburg): Inanda. 06-1880. (-DB), Wood
795 (STE). 2931 (Stanger): Chakaskraal, by streams, 100 m, 02-1916,
(-AC), Thode 4407 (STE). 3030 (Port Shepstone): Fairfield, Dumisa, 750
m, 14-01-191 1, (-AD). Rudatis 1303 (STE); Oribi side river, in riverbed
between boulders, 23-01-1973, (-CB), Slrey 11061 (PRE); Izotsha, riv-
erbank, mud, 16-11-1969. (-CD), Slrey 9283 (PRE).
CAPE. — 3227 (Stutterheim): Komgha River, 330 m. 11-1892,
(-DB), Flanagan 1452 (STE). 3318 (Cape Town): Cape Peninsula, Table
Mountain, Orange Kloof, 08-1903, (-CD), Marloth 3431 (STE);
Jonkershoek, Bosboukloof, 320 m, 05-1967, (-DD), Kerfoot 5805 (STE).
3319 (Worcester): near Karoo Botanic Garden, beside dam, 330 m,
11-10-1969, (-CB), Rycroft 3055 (NBG. STE). 3323 (Willowmore):
Avontuur Poort, 4 miles from Uniondale, 810 m, 12-1930, (-CA), Four-
cade 4520 (STE). 3326 (Grahamstown): Grahamstown, 01-04-1922,
(-BC), Wilson SA142 (STE). 3418 (Simonstown): lower Eerste River
below Krammat near mouth on Zandvliet allotment, riverbank, 7 m.
06-01-1978, (-BB), Boucher 3475 (STE); Sir Lowry’s Pass, Steenbras
side, 04-1948, (-BB), Stokoe SAM 61497 (PRE, SAM); Palmiet River
Mouth near Kleinmond, 5 m, 17-03-1983, (-BD), Van Wyk 1183 (STE).
3419 (Caledon): Palmiet River, 25-04-1948, (-AA), De Vos 895 (STE).
3423 (Knysna): Concordia, along streams and on moist ground. 230 m,
03-1921, (-AA).A'eet 705(STE); Keurboo ms River, 160 m, 1969, (-AB),
Heinecken K58 (STE). 3424 (Humansdorp): Kromme River at Assegai
Bosch, 223 m, 03-1931, (-BA), Fourcade 4565 (STE).
Smaller form
CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): Blaauwklip Stellenbosch. 01-1926,
(-DD), Gilletts. n. (STE). 3319 (Worcester): Wemmershoek, ProteaState
Forest Reserve, ENE of Wemmershoek Station, 800 m. 29-02-1992,
(-CC), Oliver 10053 (STE). 3320 (Montagu): Langeberg East.
Lemoenshoek. 550 m, 25-02-1988, (-DD), Van der Merwe 226 (STE).
3321 (Ladismith): Elandskloof between Vleiland and Seweweekspoort,
1 300 m, 20-02-1986. (-AD). Moffett & Steensma 3824 (STE); Garcia’s
Pass near Tollhouse, 19-04-1983, (-CC). Fellingham 445 (STE). 3322
(Oudtshoorn): Boomplaas, Cango Valley on banks of Grobbelaars River,
24-06-1974, (-AC), Moffett 62 (STE). 3418 (Simonstown): Cape of
Good Hope Nature Reserve, 330 m, 09-03-1973, (-AB), Taylor 8352
34
Bothalia 24,1 ( 1994)
(STE); Gordon’s Bay, March. (-BB), Duthie 762 (STE); Rooiels, River
Mouth, near Hangklip Floodplain, 11-03-1981, (-BD), Parsons 59
(STE). 3419 (Caledon): Oudebos, Riviersonderend, 04-1930, (-AB),
Stokoe s.n. (STE); between Avoka and Goedvertrou, 83 m, 22-05-1971,
(-DA), Thompson 1207 (STE). 3420 (Bredasdorp): Breede River at
Malgas, 16 m, 07-03-1971. (-BC). Heard 3 (STE). 3421 (Riversdale):
Korente River Dam, 200 m, 26-09-1979, (-AA), Bohnen 6621 (STE).
REFERENCES
ECKLON, C. F. & ZEYHER, C. 1836. Enumeratio plantarum africae
australis extra tropicae. part 2.
LINNAEUS, C. 1774. Systema vegetabilium...editio decima tertia , edn
13. J.A. Murray (ed.). Gotha, Gottingen.
PLUKENET, L. 1694. Alrnagestum botanicum: t. 275, fig. 2. London.
STAFLEU, F. A. & COWAN, R. S. 1981. Taxonomic Literature 3: 670.
Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema, Utrecht; Junk, The Hague.
WEIMARCK, H. 1933. New species in the genus Cliffortia. Botaniska
Notiser 1933: 158-160.
WEIMARCK. H. 1934. Monograph of the genus Cliffortia. Gleerupska
Universitets Bokhandeln. Lund.
WEIMARCK, H. 1940. Some notes on the genus Cliffortia. Botaniska
Notiser 1 940: 400.
A C. FELLINGHAM*
*Stellenbosch Herbarium, National Botanical Institute, P.O. Box 471,
Stellenbosch 7599.
MS. received: 1993-04-01.
ASPHODELACEAE/ALOACEAE
WAS GASTER1A N1TIDA VAR. ARMSTRONG!! VALIDLY PUBLISHED?
In the recently published synopsis of the genus Gas-
teria Duval (Van Jaarsveld 1992: 12), the full page refer-
ence to the basionym of Gasteria nitida var. armstrongii
(Schonland) Van Jaarsv. was not given where the new
combination was made. The combination therefore ap-
pears not to have been validly published (Eggli & Taylor
1993). Under Art. 33.2 of the Botanical Code (Greuter et
al. 1988), on or after 1 January 1953, a new combination
is not validly published unless its basionym is clearly in-
dicated and a full and direct reference -.given to its author
and place of valid publication with page or plate reference
and date.
However, the name has been validly published because
the page reference required for validation is given in the
list of references of the same paper (Van Jaarsveld 1992).
The entry 'Schonl. in Rec. Albany Mus. 1912', on p. 12,
is a perfectly acceptable, unambiguous citation of the item
fully listed under 'References’ on p. 28. This point of view
is in accordance with the interpretation of Brummitt
(1969: 45), who determined that the combination Erysi-
mum arbuscula (Lowe) Snogerup was validly published
by citation of the basionym reference in detail in the bib-
liography, but indirectly only in the text (Snogerup 1967:
9). Furthermore, the policy of the herbarium of the Royal
Botanic Gardens, Kew, regarding validly published names
included in the Kew Record of Taxonomic Literature was
formulated as follows: ‘A reference to the basionym is
accepted if it is cited adjacent to, or clearly associated
with, a new combination, or in a bibliography at the end
of the paper, but not if it is elsewhere in the same paper
without any clear connection’ (Royal Botanic Gardens,
Kew 1974: 383).
The full citation to the name therefore is:
Gasteria nitida var. armstrongii (Schonland) Van
Jaarsv. Basionym: Gasteria armstrongii Schonland in Re-
cords of the Albany Museum 2,4: 258 (1912).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Dr Donald B.J. Killick, formerly of the Botanical Re-
search Institute, Pretoria, and Prof. W. Greuter and Dr B.
Zimmer of the Botanisches Garten und Botanisches Mu-
seum, Berlin-Dahlem, are thanked for their comments on
an earlier draft of this paper.
REFERENCES
BRUMMITT, R.K. 1969. On some requirements for valid publication of
names. Regnum Vegetabile 60: 42-57.
EGGLI, U. & TAYLOR, N.R (eds) 1993. Aloaceae. In Repertorium
Plantarum Succulentarum ( 1992) 43: 6.
GREUTER, W. et al. 1988. International Code of Botanical Nomencla-
ture. Regnum Vegetabile 1 18.
ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS, KEW 1974. The Kew Record, a new
annual bibliography. Taxon 23: 381-386.
SCHoNLAND, S. 1912. A new species of Gasteria. Records of the
Albany Museum 2: 258.
SNOGERUP, S. 1967. Studies in the Aegean flora. VIII. Erysimum sect.
Cheiranthus. A. Taxonomy. Opera Botanica 13: 3-70.
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. 1992. The genus Gasteria, a synoptic review.
Aloe 29: 5-32.
G.F. SMITH*, B-E. VAN WYK** and E.J. VAN JAARSVELD***
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001.
** Department of Botany, Rand Afrikaans University, P.O. Box 524,
Auckland Park 2006.
*** Kirstenbosch National Botanical Garden, National Botanical Insti-
tute, Private Bag XI, Claremont 7735.
MS. received: 1993-11-24.
ALOE BARBERAE TO REPLACE A. BAINESII
In an enumeration of the tree aloes of southern Africa,
Dyer (1874a) described as new two tree aloes from the
subtropical eastern coastal areas: A. bainesii from northern
Natal and A. barberae from ‘Caffraria’ (Transkei). These
two ‘species’ were described as differing mainly in their
leaf characters, A. barberae having longer, less glaucous,
and more widely spaced leaves.
A few months later Dyer (1874b), in a short note in
the same journal, decided to combine the latter two spe-
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
35
cies and expressly chose the name A. barberae for the
southeastern African tree aloe. Unfortunately this publica-
tion was overlooked by all subsequent research workers
on Aloe, notably Baker (1880) and Reynolds (1950). How-
ever, Baker (1885) regarded A. bainesii and A. barberae
as conspecific, but incorrectly chose as the correct name
A. bainesii. An attempt by Baker (1896) to taxonomically
reinstate A. barberae as a variety of A. bainesii has re-
ceived little support.
Therefore, although the name A. bainesii has been
widely adopted by most southern African 11 ora writers and
succulentists, it has to be rejected in favour of the name
A. barberae , which was chosen as the one to be accepted
by the original author.
Aloe barberae Dyer in The Gardeners' Chronicle
(n.s.) 1: 568 ( 1874a);’ Dyer: 720 (1874b); Dyer: 90
(1875a); Dyer: 49 (1875b). Type: Hort ..Anon. s.n. (K!).
A. bainesii Dyer: 568 (1874a). Baker: t. 6848 (1885); Baker: 326
(1896); Berger: 319 ( 1908); Marloth: 92 (1915); Sim: 152 ( 1919); Reyn-
olds: 498 (1950); Jeppe: 59 (1969); Bomman & Hardy: 281 (1972);
Palmer & Pitman: 339 (1972); Compton: 98 (1976). Type: Natal. Grey-
town Dist., T. Baines s.n. (K!).
A. bainesii Dyer var. barberae (Dyer) Baker: 326 (1896).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Dr Colin C. Walker, Open University, Milton Keynes,
U.K. and Mrs Estelle Potgieter, Chief Librarian, Mary
Gunn Library, are thanked for locating and supplying cop-
ies of scarce publications and illustrations. Dr Donald J.
B. Killick is thanked for his comments on an earlier draft
of this paper.
REFERENCES
BAKER, J.G. 1880. A synopsis of Aloineae and Yuccoideae. Journal of
the Linnean Society, Botany 18: 148-241.
BAKER, J.G. 1885. Aloe bainesii. Curtis’ Botanical Magazine 111: t.
6848.
BAKER, J.G. 1896. Aloe. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora capensis 6,2:
302-320. Reeve, London.
BERGER, A. 1908. Liliaceae-Asphodeloideae-Aloineae. Aloe. In A.
Engler, Das Pflanzenreich 4.38.3.2 (Heft 33): 150-326. Engel-
mann, Leipzig.
BORNMAN, H. & HARDY. D.S. 1972. Aloes of the South African veld.
Voortrekkerpers, Johannesburg.
COMPTON, R.H. 1976. Flora of Swaziland. Journal of South African
Botany supplementary vol. 11: 1-684.
DYER. W.T. THISELTON 1874a. The tree aloes of South Africa. The
Gardeners' Chronicle (n.s.) 1: 566-569. 571.
DYER. W.T. THISELTON 1874b. Tree aloes of South Africa. The
Gardeners ' Chronicle (n.s.) 2: 720.
DYER, W.T. THISELTON 1875a. The tree aloes of South Africa. Nature
11: 89-91.
DYER. W.T. THISELTON 1875b. Short notes and queries. Tree aloes.
Journal of Botany, London 13: 49, 50.
JEPPE. B. 1969. South African aloes. Purnell. Cape Town.
MARLOTH, H.W.R. 1915. The flora of South Africa. Vol. 4. Monocoty-
ledons. Darter, Cape Town.
PALMER, E. & PITMAN, N. 1972. Trees of southern Africa. Balkema,
Cape Town.
REYNOLDS, G.W. 1950. The aloes of South Africa. Aloes of South
Africa Book Fund, Johannesburg.
SIM. T.R. 1919. Flowering trees and shrubs. Specialty, Cape Town.
G.F. SMITH*. B-E. VAN WYK** and H.F. GLEN*
* National Botanical Institute. Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001.
** Department of Botany, Rand Afrikaans University, P.O. Box 524,
Auckland Park 2006.
MS. received: 1993-11-24.
BORAGINACEAE
THE CORRECT AUTHOR CITATION FOR LOBOSTEMON MONTANUS
Herman (1993) cited Lobostemon montanus (DC.) H.
Buek; however, Buek described L. montanus in 1837,
whereas De Candolle published the combination Echium
montanum (H. Buek) DC. in 1846. The correct author
citation is therefore L. montanus H. Buek.
REFERENCES
BUEK, H.W. 1837. Echia capensia. Linnaea 11: 132.
DE CANDOLLE. A.P. 1 846. Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vege-
tabilis ... 10: 15. Treuttel & Wiirtz, London.
HERMAN, P. 1993. Boraginaceae. In T.H. Arnold & B.C. de Wet. Plants
of southern Africa: names and distribution. Memoirs of the Bota-
nical Sur\’ey of South Africa No. 62.
M.H. BUYS and J.J.A. VAN DER WALT*
* Department of Botany, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X5018,
Stellenbosch 7599.
MS. received: 1993-11-09.
'
Bothalia 24,1: 37-53 (1994)
Ferns and flowering plants of Klaserie Private Nature Reserve, eastern
Transvaal: an annotated checklist
N. ZAMBATIS*
Keywords: checklist, eastern Transvaal, Klaserie, Savanna Biome
ABSTRACT
An annotated checklist of the plant taxa of the Klaserie Private Nature Reserve, eastern Transvaal Lowveld, is presented. Of
the 6 1 8 infrageneric taxa recorded, six are pteridophytes and the remainder angiosperms. Of these, 161 are monocotyledons and
451 dicotyledons. Five of the latter are currently listed in the Red Data List of the Transvaal, two of which are first records for
the Transvaal Lowveld. The vegetation of the reserve shows strong affinities with the Savanna Biome, and to a lesser degree,
with the Grassland Biome.
UITTREKSEL
'n Geannoteerde kontrolelys van die planttaksons van die Klaserie Privaatnatuurreservaat, Oos-Transvaalse Lae veld, word
gegee. Van die 618 taksons wat aangeteken is, is ses pteridofiete en die res angiosperme, waarvan 161 monokotiele en 451
dikotiele is. Vyf van laasgenoemde taksons word tans in die Rooidatalys van Transvaal ingesluit. Twee hiervan verteenwoordig
eerste rekords vir die Transvaalse Laeveld. Die plantegroei van die reservaat toon 'n sterk affiniteit tot die Savanne Bioom en,
tot ’n mindere mate, met die Grasveld Bioom.
INTRODUCTION
No comprehensive plant list of Klaserie Private Nature
Reserve (KPNR) has previously been produced. Wit-
kowski (1983) recorded a total of 124 taxa, whereas this
list comprises a total of 618 taxa. Additions to this list
will no doubt be made in the future. Apart from free-rang-
ing exotic taxa, no other exotic (or indigenous) taxa
planted in gardens were included. No algae, mosses, or
fungi have been collected or recorded by the author nor,
as far as is known, by any other collectors.
STUDY AREA
The Klaserie Private Nature Reserve (KPNR) is situ-
ated between the town of Hoedspruit and the Kruger Na-
tional Park (KNP), with which it shares a common
boundary of some seven kilometres. To the east lie the_
Timbavati, Umbabat. and Ntsiri Private Nature Reserves
(Figure 1 ).
The reserve extends from 24°02' to 24°16'S, and
31°03' to 31°19'E and thus falls within the following quar-
ter degree square grids: 2431 AA, 2431AB, 243 1AC, and
2431 AD.
The area was proclaimed as a nature reserve in 1972
and is jointly owned by 107 members. Prior to its proc-
lamation, the area was partly utilized for cattle farming.
Diseases and predators, however, led to the abandonment
of this form of land use.
* National Parks Board, Kruger National Park, Private Bag X402,
Skukuza 1350.
MS. received: 1993-02-04.
With a surface area of 62 818 ha, the KPNR is the
largest privately owned nature reserve in the Transvaal
Lowveld. and probably the largest in the country. Together
with the other two large private nature reserves, Timbavati
to the east and Sabi-Sand in the south, as well as a number
of smaller private nature reserves in the area, it comprises
a portion of an important conservation, tourism, and hunt-
ing area of over 180 000 ha.
In terms of a recent Contractual Park Agreement be-
tween the National Parks Board and a number of privately
owned nature reserves, including the KPNR, bordering
the Kruger National Park (KNP), common fences between
these reserves and the KNP have been removed.
All the more common larger mammals, including the
full spectrum of carnivores occurring in the KNP are also
found in the KPNR.
Plant specimens were collected or recorded routinely
during the course of other work undertaken in KPNR.
This formed part of an overall objective of compiling a
herbarium collection of the central Transvaal Lowveld re-
gion outside the KNP.
Geologically, KPNR consists primarily of granitoid
rocks of the Swazian Period, i.e. Makhutswi Gneiss. The
gneiss is intruded by a few relatively small, scattered out-
crops of Harmony Granite and the Phalaborwa complex.
Other formations which occur in the area include Milky
Quartz Pegmatite and a very small outcrop of Dark Green-
ish Black Clinopyroxene Hornblende of the Rubbervale
Formation (Geological Survey 1986).
The geomorphology of KPNR can generally be de-
scribed as gently rolling or undulating over most of its
area, the southern part being almost flat. The northern
38
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
FIGURE 1.— The locality of the
Klaserie Private Nature Re-
serve. Broken lines denote
quarter-degree squares. Inset
shows the reserve’s locality
within the Transvaal. Biomes
after Rutherford & Westfall
(1986), figure taken from
Huntley (1989).
third is somewhat more rugged, however, with many rel-
atively short drainage lines. Boulder or rock outcrops are
common here, in places forming low koppies or ridges.
Soils of this region generally comprise shallow sandy
loam or gravel, and loose surface stones and rocks are
common. Elsewhere, soils are generally deeper and pri-
marily sandy to loamy or loamy in texture. Along lower-
lying areas, clay-loam or clay predominates, particularly
along watercourses. Alluvial sand ts frequently encoun-
tered along the banks of the rivers and larger seasonal
streams.
Drainage is provided primarily by the Olifants,
Klaserie, and Ntsiri Rivers. The Olifants and Klaserie are
normally perennial, though in recent times, particularly
during periods of drought, the Klaserie ceases to How,
and the Olifants decreases to a small stream.
Mean annual rainfall recorded in the reserve over the
past 16 years totals 424.7 mm. During this period, a mean
annual rainfall of 452.8 mm has been recorded at Ncheni
Gate, 408.5 mm at Xanatseni Gate, and 432.0 mm at
Xiplapaleni Gate. A mean of 407.8 mm over a 33-year
period has been recorded at the reserve’s headquarters
(Warden’s records, unpublished).
The reserve's mean annual rainfall is well below 530
mm, the approximate upper limit for the arid subdivision
of the Savanna Biome, and is close to 400 mm, the lower
limit given for the dry subdivision of the Grassland Biome
(Rutherford & Westfall 1986).
Altitude ranges from 303 m in the northeast at the con-
fluence of the Klaserie and Olifants Rivers, to 535 m in
the southwestern comer — a difference of 232 m over a
distance of 33 km.
The vegetation of KPNR falls within the Savanna
Biome (Gibbs Russell 1987; Rutherford & Westfall 1986).
According to Acocks (1988), the only Veld Type of the
reserve is Arid Lowveld of the Tropical Bush and Savanna
Types (Bushveld). In the northeastern and eastern sectors
of the reserve however, mopani veld ( Colophospermum
mopane) is present and is dominant over large areas, de-
creasing in extent southwards, where it occurs in the form
of small, scattered pockets. The vegetation of KPNR has
been mapped in greater detail at the reconnaissance level.
Bothalia 24, 1 (1994)
39
and 15 major associations were identified (Zambatis
1983).
METHODS
The great majority of taxa given in the list which fol-
lows were collected or recorded over the period 1973 to
1987 by the author whilst in the service of the Transvaal
Directorate of Nature and Environmental Conservation
(TDNEC). Apart from duplicate specimens donated to the
National Botanical Institute's National Herbarium in Pre-
toria (which undertook the identification of all the speci-
mens collected), the collection is housed in the herba-
rium of the Hans Hoheisen Wildlife Research Station
(HHWRS), bordering the Kruger National Park at Orpen
Gate.
Taxa recorded but not collected by the author were
listed after being identified by reference to herbarium ma-
terial collected elsewhere in the region. Where no doubt
existed as to their identity, these were recorded without
any reference to herbarium material.
Nomenclature, taxonomic sequence of arrangement
and spelling used throughout this list follows that of the
National Botanical Institute’s PRECIS system as detailed
in Gibbs Russell et al. (1985, 1987, 1988; De Wet et al.
1989, 1990, 1991; Arnold & De Wet 1993). Taxonomic
numbering has however been omitted in order to enhance
clarity and brevity.
Synonyms are given only in those cases where taxo-
nomic revision and subsequent name changes occurred
after specimens were originally named.
With few exceptions, the taxa have been annotated
with summarized field notes made at the time of collec-
tion. A standard sequence of annotation has been followed
whereby the first category represents the life form, fol-
lowed by the height range, vegetation type, habitat, and
soil texture. These categories are separated by a comma.
Where a category was not recorded, this is indicated by
a dash.
The vegetation and habitat types given for each taxon
refer only to the specimens collected or recorded. This
does not imply that the taxon in general is restricted to
this vegetation or habitat type. Many of the taxa occur in
a variety of vegetation and habitat types.
Life form classes are according to the Raunkiaer sys-
tem as used by Miiller-Dombois & Ellenberg (1974) and
Rutherford & Westfall (1986). Height classes of phanero-
phytes are those of Miiller-Dombois & Ellenberg (1974).
The following classes are used:
Phanerophytes (P): perennial plants, usually woody,
mean height of the renewal buds > 0.7 m above ground.
Mesophanerophytes (Me): mean height of the renewal
buds 5-50 m. Microphanerophytes (Mi): mean height of
the renewal buds 2-5 m. Nanophanerophytes (N): mean
height of the renewal buds < 2 m. Chamaephytes (Ch):
perennial plants, generally woody or partly woody, mean
height of the renewal buds < 0.7 m. Hemicryptophytes
(H): perennial plants, generally herbaceous, renewal buds
at, or usually, close to ground level and seldom over 0. 1
m. Geophytes (G): perennial plants, usually herbaceous,
renewal buds below ground level. Therophytes (T):
ephemeral plants (annuals). Lianas (L): plants that grow
by supporting themselves on others. Epiphytes (E): plants
that germinate and root on other plants, including dead
standing plants. Parasites (Pa): green plants growing at-
tached to other living autotrophic plants.
The other annotations are explained below:
Height: given in metres. In most cases, a height range
is given, though where only one specimen was collected
or recorded, only one height is given. Vegetation type: the
dominant (i.e. most abundant) woody species, such as
Combretum, Acacia, Colophospermum, etc. 'Mixed wood-
land' is used in cases where dominance by one or more
species is not clearly evident and is thus a mixture of
various species. The term 'woodland' is used in a broad
context and does not necessarily imply a dominance by
trees. A common feature in fact is the presence of both
trees and shrubs, in varying degrees of dominance, though
in no case where 'woodland' is used, is the tree stratum
absent. 'Riverine' refers to the woodland and shrubveld
along the two perennial rivers, the Olifants and Klaserie,
whereas ‘seasonal stream' refers to the vegetation occur-
ring along the banks of the numerous watercourses of a
seasonal nature, varying from substantial rivers such as
the Ntsiri, to the many minor streams, gullies and other
tributaries of the perennial rivers. In both these forms of
riverine vegetation, physiognomic variations exist and
range from poorly developed, to closed tall woodland,
with or without a dense (or more open) thicket under-
storey. Although many taxa are common to both of these
riverine forms, sufficient physiognomic and floristic dif-
ferences in these (and in the water regime) exist to war-
rant a separation between them. 'Koppie' is applied to a
range of vegetation types associated with rocky ridges,
koppies, or isolated boulder or rock outcrops of varying
extent and height above the surrounding terrain. 'Open
parkland' refers to the vegetation structure of the seepline
complex where trees are scattered or absent, with a scat-
tered shrub stratum, whereas 'grassland' refers only to sea-
sonally or perennially waterlogged marshy areas (vleis),
the presence of woody plants being a rare exception. Hab-
itat: the term 'dryland' refers to the broadly homogeneous
area occurring between one drainage line and another, but
excludes distinctly different or specialized habitats which
are floristically and physiognomically atypical of the sur-
rounding area and which generally occupy the same to-
pographic position. Examples of these exceptions are
koppies and rock outcrops, seasonal seepage areas, vleis,
and riverine habitats. An overriding feature of dryland is
the presence of a woody component in the form of one
or two strata, namely tree and shrub layers, each occurring
in varying frequency or dominance, ranging from sparse
to dense. 'Dryland' is thus synonymous with 'veld', in a
broad context, but within the confines of the Savanna
Biome of Rutherford & Westfall (1986) and Gibbs Russell
(1987).
A 'seepline complex' represents a specialized habitat
for a variety of plant types, a number of which appear to
be restricted to this type of habitat. These areas are com-
monly located on slopes on a catenary sequence of soil
40
Bothalia 24,1 ( 1994)
types. Sandy soils occur on the upper side of the seepage
area, grading into sandy loam and finally into clayey loam
or clay at the bottom of the slope. During the rainy season,
and particularly after several days of heavy rain, water
seeps to the surface at the sand/clay interface, creating
damp or even waterlogged conditions for prolonged peri-
ods. A gradient in the distribution of plant types along
these areas is also evident, with Tenninalia sericea char-
acteristically demarcating the upper edge. These areas are
vulnerable to erosion when heavily utilized by herbivores
due to the concentration of salts which lead to defloccula-
tion and collapse of the clay structure. When in this state,
they are known as sodic areas (Scholes 1985). In this ar-
ticle, no distinction has been made between the two, as
certain plant taxa occur on both types of habitats, hence
the term 'complex’.
A 'rock outcrop' refers to the habitat structure of the
koppie vegetation type and can comprise large and exten-
sive boulders, or isolated clumps of rocks. In practically
all rock outcrop habitats, soils are shallow to very shallow,
and sandy or gravelly, witli smaller, loose stones being
common.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A total of 618 infrageneric, or 'lower’, taxa have been
recorded in the KPNR. This does not include specimens
identified to the genus level only, except those which are
the only members recorded in a particular family or genus.
Taxa of the same species but with different subspecies or
varieties were regarded as different taxa. These are
summarised in Table 1 according to the number of fam-
ilies, genera, and taxa in the pteridophytes, monocotyle-
dons, and dicotyledons.
Twenty-seven (26.2%) of the total number of families
contribute 1% or more of the total number of taxa (Table
2). Genera with six or more taxa (> I % of the total number
of taxa) are listed in Table 3.
Free-ranging exotics are represented by 39 taxa.
Five taxa, listed as 'rare' in the Red Data List for the
Transvaal (Fourie 1986; revised by the Flora Division of
TDNEC, unpublished), have been recorded for KPNR.
These were all collected by the author (collector’s number
in brackets): Aloe vandennerwei (880); Nymphaea lotus
(1092); Phyllanthus pinnatus (891, 1214); Ceropegia
mafekingensis (1536); Orbea maculata (1602).
TABLE 2. — Families with 1% or more of the total number of infrageneric
taxa
Two of these, N. lotus and C. mafekingensis , are first re-
cords for the Lowveld (E. van Hoepen pers. comm.). Nei-
ther of these taxa have yet been collected in the KNP,
though N. lotus has apparently been recorded by S.P.
Fourie of the TDNEC. In the case of A. vandennerwei,
the only specimen collected was from a small group which
appears to have been planted at Xanatseni Gate. A search
for wild-growing specimens in the vicinity of this gate
proved fruitless. It is possible that these specimens were
introduced into the reserve from beyond its boundaries.
This plant thus remains to be confirmed in its natural hab-
itat within the reserve.
Despite its relatively arid climate, and the fact that the
surface area of KPNR is a mere 0.1% of the total surface
area of the Savanna Biome of 632 034 km, the reserve’s
These represent 2% of the total number of 25 1 taxa
currently listed in the Red Data List for the Transvaal.
TABLE 1. — Number of families, genera and infrageneric taxa recorded
in the Klaserie Private Nature Reserve
Pterido- Monocoty- Dicoty-
phyta ledonae ledonae
TABLE 3. — Genera with 1% or more of the total number of infrageneric
taxa
Bothalia 24, 1 (1994)
41
618 infrageneric taxa represent 10.7% of the total number
of taxa (5 788) recorded in this biome (Gibbs Russell
1987). The riverine habitats along the two perennial rivers
of the reserve partly account for this relatively high num-
ber of taxa. If the frequency and duration of desiccation
of these rivers, however, increases in the future (as it is
likely to do, given the ever-increasing human demands on
all water resources), a decline of these plant communities,
or even the disappearance of certain taxa is likely to occur.
The quarter-degree squares of the KPNR were not in-
cluded in the PRECIS search undertaken by Gibbs Russell
(1987) in her analysis of the southern African biomes, and
in the determination of the core areas of these biomes. In
this search, she recorded 21 families, comprising 1% or
more of the taxa, which together account for 55-60% of
the total number of taxa recorded in the Savanna Biome.
These families, all of which have been recorded in KPNR
as well, account for 459 (74.2%) of the reserve’s total
number of taxa. These relationships consequently reflect
a strong affinity of the flora of KPNR with that of the
Savanna Biome in general.
A total of 22 families and 36 genera with 10 taxa or
more, have their centres of diversity in the Savanna and
Grassland Biomes (Gibbs Russell 1987). All except one
of these (Aspleniaceae) and six genera, have also been
recorded in the KPNR, indicating a strong relationship
with the Grassland Biome as well. It is significant to note
though, that the Orchidaceae, represented by a total of 53
taxa common to the Savanna and Grassland Biomes, and
which, together with the Lamiaceae, distinguishes the
Grassland Biome (Gibbs Russell 1987), is very poorly
represented in KPNR, with only two taxa being recorded.
This poor representation of the Orchidaceae can most
probably be ascribed to the relatively arid climate of
KPNR.
In the Umfolozi Game Reserve, on the other hand, this
family is absent, in spite of a mean annual rainfall of 625
mm. Downing & Gibbs Russell (1981) suggest that wild
herbivores could have severely depleted the rhizomes of
any ground orchids present, while extensive and intensive
spraying of insecticides during the tse-tse fly eradication
campaign could have inhibited sexual reproduction by
eliminating insect pollinators of both ground and epiphytic
orchids. A similar situation is evident in the Manyeleti
Game Reserve, bordering the KNP on the western side of
the central region of the Park. Here, Bredenkamp (1982)
only recorded one taxon of this family, even though this
reserve falls within the mesic subdivision of the Savanna
Biome (Rutherford & Westfall 1986). No insecticide
spraying has been undertaken in KPNR.
The generally arid nature of a major part of the
Lowveld consequently appears to be the reason for the
relatively poor representation of this family in this part of
the Savanna Biome, which therefore weakens the link be-
tween this biome and the Grassland Biome somewhat, at
least in this region.
The aridity of KPNR is most probably also the reason
for the absence of the Aspleniaceae. This large family ap-
pears to be confined to the higher rainfall regions of the
country, as shown on the distribution maps of Jacobsen
(1983) and Burrows (1990). This is further reflected by
the fact that the only two members of this family recorded
in the KNP are restricted to the Pretoriuskop area of the
Park, which receives the highest mean annual rainfall for
the Park of some 722 mm.
Table 4 summarises the life forms of the KPNR flora.
This shows that woody plants — phanerophytes and cham-
aephytes, together comprise 31.7% of all taxa, whereas
herbaceous plants, the hemicryptophytes and therophytes,
comprise 51.7%. The high frequency of woody and her-
baceous taxa is further evidence that the vegetation of the
reserve comprises a woody layer above an herbaceous
layer.
TABLE 4. — Number of infrageneric taxa and percentage of total per life
form category
Mes, mesophanerophyte; Mi, microphanerophyte; N. nanophanero-
phyte; Ch, chamaephyte; H, hemicryptophyte; G, geophyte; T, thero-
phyte; L, liana; E. epiphyte; Pa. parasite; P. phanerophyte.
CONCLUSION
The primary purpose of this article is to provide a sys-
tematic list of the flora of KPNR, which can be used in
a variety of more detailed studies. Nevertheless, this rather
brief analysis of the reserve’s flora shows that very strong
affinities exist with the Savanna Biome, and to a lesser
degree, with the Grassland Biome as well. The vegetation
of the Klaserie Private Nature Reserve can therefore be
regarded as comprising part of the core area of the Sa-
vanna Biome.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The many landowners of KPNR are thanked for al-
lowing me to collect plant specimens on their properties,
as is the Warden, Mr E.P Leibnitz, for his interest and
support.
The identification of the large number of specimens
collected over the years was undertaken by the National
Botanical Institute, Pretoria. Without the assistance of the
many persons involved, it would not have been possible
to compile this list. In particular, the assistance of Mrs E.
van Hoepen, Ms E. Retief, and Mrs B.C. de Wet is grate-
fully acknowledged.
The Directorate of Nature and Environmental Conser-
vation (Transvaal) is thanked for providing the support
which made this work possible.
REFERENCES
ACOCKS. J.RH. 1988. Veld types of South Africa, 3rd edn. Memoirs of
the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 57.
42
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
ARNOLD, T.H. & DE WET, B.C. 1993. Plants of southern Africa: names
and distribution. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa
No. 62.
BREDENKAMP, G.J. 1982. 'n Plantekologiese studie van die Manyeleti-
wildtuin. D.Sc. thesis. University of Pretoria, Pretoria.
BURROWS, J.E. 1990. Southern African ferns and fern allies. Frandsen
Publishers, Sandton.
DE WET, B.C., GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., GERMISHUIZEN, G„
SHRIRE, B.D.. JORDAAN, M„ PIENAAR, B.J., WELMAN,
W.G., REID, C., VAN WYK, C.M., FISH. L„ IMMELMAN,
K.L., VAN ROOY, I, GLEN, H.F. & BARKER, N.P. 1989. New
taxa, new records and name changes for southern African plants.
Bothalia 19: 275-294.
DE WET, B.C., GERMISHUIZEN, G„ SHRIRE, B.D., JORDAAN, M„
PIENAAR, B.J., WELMAN, W.G., REID, C., VAN WYK, C.M.,
FISH, L„ IMMELMAN, K.L., VAN ROOY, J„ PEROLD, S.M.,
TAUSSIG, J„ BARKER, N.P. & GLEN, H.F. 1990. New taxa,
new records and name changes for southern African plants.
Bothalia 20: 249-266.
DE WET, B.C., ARCHER, R„ FISH, L„ GERMISHUZEN, G„ HER-
MAN, P.P., JORDAAN, M„ PEROLD, S.M., REID, C„ VAN
ROOY, J„ WELMAN, W.G. & GLEN, H.F. 1991. New taxa, new
records and name changes for southern African plants. Bothalia
21: 191-213.
DOWNING, B.H. & GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E. 1981. Phytogeographic
and biotic relationships of a savanna in southern Africa: analysis
of an angiosperm checklist from Acacia woodland in Zululand.
Journal of South African Botany 47: 721-742.
FOURIE, S.P. 1986. The Transvaal, South Africa, Threatened Plants
Programme. Biological Conservation 37: 23^-2.
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 1986. 1:250 000 Geological Series. 2430
Pilgrim’s Rest. Map published by Dept, of Mineral and Energy
Affairs, Pretoria. Government Printer, Pretoria.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E. 1 987. Preliminary floristic analysis of the major
biomes in southern Africa. Bothalia 17: 231-227.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., REID, C., VAN ROOY, J. & SMOOK, L. 1985.
List of species of southern African plants, edn 2, part 1 . Memoirs
of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 5 1 .
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., REID, C„ FISH, L„ GERMISHUIZEN, G„
VAN WYK, M„ VAN ROOY, J. & STAFF 1987. New taxa, new
records and name changes for southern African plants. Bothalia
17: 269-275.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., WELMAN, W.G., GERMISHUIZEN, G„
RETIEF, E„ PIENAAR, B.J., REID, C., FISH, L„ VAN ROOY,
J., VAN WYK, C.M., KALAKE, E. & STAFF 1988. New taxa,
new records and name changes for southern African plants.
Bothalia 1 8: 293-304.
HUNTLEY, B.J. 1989. Biotic diversity in southern Africa: concepts and
conservation. Oxford University Press, Cape Town.
JACOBSEN, W.B.G. 1983. The fern and fern allies of southern Africa.
Butterworths, Pretoria.
MULLER-DOMBOIS , D. & ELLENBERG, H. 1974. Aims and methods
of vegetation ecology. John Wiley, New York.
RUTHERFORD, M.C. & WESTFALL, R.H. 1986. Biomes of southern
Africa — an objective categorization. Memoirs of the Botanical
Survey of South Africa No. 54.
SCHOLES, R.J. 1985. A guide to bush clearing in the eastern Transvaal
Lowveld. Resource Ecology Group, Dept, of Botany, University
of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
WITKOWSKI, E.T.F. 1983. Ecology of the Klaserie Private Nature
Resen’e. M. Sc. thesis. University of the Witwatersrand. Johan-
nesburg.
ZAMBATIS, N. 1983. The major vegetation associations of the Klaserie
Private Nature Resen’e. Unpublished map, Transvaal Nature
Conservation Division.
SYSTEMATIC CHECKLIST
After the name of the author(s) of the species name, the sequence of annotation is as follows:
collection number : without initials — author; with initials — RPE = R.P. Ellis, JdK = J.P.S. de Kock, P.J.M. = P.J.M. Muller.
§ taxa recorded, but not collected by author.
+ recorded by Witkowski ( 1983).
* exotic taxa, including naturalized taxa.
life form: Mes, mesophanerophyte; Mi, microphanerophyte; N, nanophanerophyte; Ch, chamaephyte; H, hemicryptophyte; G, geophyte; T, thero-
phyte; L, liana; E, epiphyte; Pa, parasite,
height range in metres,
vegetation type,
habitat,
soil texture.
- not recorded.
PTERIDOPHYTA
SELAGINELLACEAE
Sellaginella
dregei (C. Presl) Hieron., 1118 , H, 0.02, open parkland, seepline com-
plex, shallow sandy loam on flat sheetrock
MARSILEACEAE
Marsilea
ephippiocarpa Alston, RPE 3464 , §, T, 0.1-0.15, Colophospermum
woodland, seasonal pans & still pools, sandy, or black clay
ADIANTACEAE
Actiniopteris
radiata (J. Kiinig ex Sw. ) Link, 1591 , H, 0.05-0. 1 , boulder bases, steep
south slopes, shade or sunlight, calcrete
Cheilanthes
involuta (Sw.) Schelpe & N. C. Anthony var. involuta, 1594, H, 0. 1, - ,
boulder bases, steep south slopes, shade, shallow sandy
Pellaea
calomelanos (Sw.) Link var. calomelanos, 984, 1 176, 1595, H, 0.2-0. 3,
Combretum woodland, steep south or east slopes, shade or sun-
light, sandy
THELYPTERIDACEAE
Ampelopteris
prolifera (Retz.) Cope!.. 983, H, 0.4-0. 6, riverine, reed bed, damp or
saturated river sand
ANGIOSPERMAE-MONOCOTYLEDONAE
TYPHACEAE
Typha
capensis (Rohrb.) N.E. Be, 970, H, 2.0, aquatic, dam shores, mud
POACEAE
Sorghum
bicolor (L.) Moench subsp. arundinaceum (Desv.) De Wet <£ Harlan
(= S. verticilliflorum (Steud.) Stapf), §, T, 1.0-1. 5, -, seasonally
wet areas, loam, sandy loam
versicolor Andersson, 913, 1121, H, 1.0, grassland, vlei edge, clayey
loam, stony to sandy loam
Bothriochloa
radicans (Lehm.)A. Camus, 307, 349, 624, 760, 1030, H, 0.4-0.9, Com-
bretum woodland, riverine, dryland, termitarium, river bank,
alluvial sand, sandy loam, loam
Dichanthium
annulatum (Forssk.) Stapf var. papillosum (A. Rich.) De Wet & Harlan
(= D. papillosum (Hochst.) Stapf), 606, H, 1 .7, riverine, river bed,
river sand
Schizachyrium
exile (Hochst.) Pilg.. RPE 3462, T, -, Colophospermum veld, -, gravelly
Andropogon
chinensis (Nees) Merr.
(= A. schinzii Hack.), 311, 759, 909, H, 1.0- 1.5, Combretum &
mixed woodland, -, sandy loam
gayanus Kunth var. polycladus (Hack.) Clayton
(= var. squamulatus (Hochst.) Stapf), 527, 908, 968, H, 2.0,
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
43
riverine, riverbed, rock outcrops, river sand, gravel, stony or
sandy loam
Cymbopogon
plurinodis (Stapf) Stapf ex Burn Davy, 352, H, 0.9, Combretum wood-
land, dryland, sandy loam
Hyperthelia
dissoluta (Nees ex Steud .) Clayton, 963, 990, 1736, H, 2. 0-2. 5, Colo-
phosperrnum woodland, disturbed (de-bushed), seasonal stream
bank, rock outcrop, stony or sandy loam
Heteropogon
contortus (L.) Roem. & Schult., 910, H, 1.0, mixed woodland, dryland,
sandy loam
Diheteropogon
amplectens(Ateey) Clayton, 966, 967, H, 0.9, Combretum woodland, rock
outcrop, sandy loam
Themeda
triandra Forssk., §, +, H, 0.6, -
Digitaria
eriantha Steud, 592
(= subsp. eriantha), 877, 929, 971
(= subsp .pentzii (Stent) Kok), 931
(= subsp. stolonifera (Stapf) Kok), 876, 878, 930, 939
(= subsp. transvaalensis Kok), 1366
All specimens combined: H, 0.4— 1.2, Combretum woodland,
mixed woodland, riverine, dryland, seepline complex, river bed,
river sand, sandy or stony loam, clay
seriata Stapf, 996, H, 0.5, riverine, river bank, alluvial sand
Eriochloa
meyeriana (Nees) Pilg. subsp. grandiglumis (Stent & J.M. Rattray ) Gibbs
Russell, 322, H, 0.4, riverine, seasonal stream, river sand
meyeriana (Nees) Pilg. subsp. meyeriana, 1029, RPE 3460, H, -, riverine,
river bank, alluvial sand
Brachiaria
deflexa ( Schumach .) C.E. Hubb. ex Robyns
(= Pseudobrachiaria deflexa (Schumach.) Launert), 593, 602, T,
0.7-0.9, Combretum woodland, dryland, disturbed (old lands),
loam
nigropedata (Ficalho & Hiem) Stapf, 616. 945, H, 0.6, Combretum &
mixed woodland, dryland, sandy loam
serrata (Thunb.) Stapf 528, H. 0.5, Combretum woodland, dryland, rock
outcrop, -
xantholeuca (Schinz) Stapf, 601, T. 0.7, disturbed (old lands), loam
Paspalum
urvillei Steud. * 1025, H, 2.0, aquatic, shores of dam, sandy loam
Urochloa
mosambicensis (Hack.) Dandy, §, +, H, 0.4, Combretum woodland,
dryland, sandy loam
trichopus (Hochst.) Stapf, 331, T, 0.3, riverine, -, sandy loam
Echinochloa
jubata Stapf, §, H, -
Panicum
coloratum L. var. coloratum. 611, H, 0.4—0.5, Combretum woodland,
dryland, sandy loam
deustum Thunb., 361, 926, H, 1.3, riverine, woodland, river and stream
bank shade, rock outcrop, river sand, stony
maximum Jacg., 313, 360, 589, 591. 949, H, 0. 7-2.0, woodland, riverine,
dryland shade, termitarium, river banks, sandy loam, river sand
Setaria
incrassata (Hochst.) Hack.
(= S. woodii Hack. var. woodii), 604, H, 1 .5, grassland, vlei, clay,
clayey loam
sagittifolia (A. Rich.) Walp.
(= Cymbosetaria sagittifolia (A. Rich. ) Schweick., 1096), T, 0.5-
1 .0, -, rock outcrop, loam
ustilata De Wit, 915, 1646, T, 0.4-0. 6, mixed woodland, seasonal stream.
shade under Combretum, river sand, sandy loam
verticillata (L.) P. Beauv., 603, T, 0.7, disturbed (old lands), loam
Melinis
repens (Willd.) Z.izka subsp. repens
(= Rhynchelytrum repens (Willd.) C.E. Hubb.), 387, T, 0.6,
disturbed (roadside, de-bushed), sandy loam
Tricholaena
monachne (Trin.) Stapf & C.E. Hubb. 363, H, 0.6, Combretum woodland,
dryland, sandy loam
Pennisetum
macrourum Trin., 1676, H, 2.0-3. 0, riverine, river bed, river sand
setaceum (Forssk. ) Chiov. * 987, H, 0.9, -, abandoned garden, stony loam
Cenchrus
ciliaris L„ 324, 334, 526, H, 0.3-0. 5, riverine, termitarium, stream bank,
sandy stony loam, loam
Phragmites
mauritianus Kunth, 1022, H, 5.0, riverine, river bed, river sand
Stipagrostis
hirtigluma (Trin. & Rupr.) De Winter subsp. patula (Hack.) De Winter,
1674, H, 0.4, Combretum woodland, dryland, shallow gravel
Aristida
adscensionis L.
(= subsp. guineensis (Trin. & Rupr.) Henrard), 761. 916, 948. T.
0.5-0.9, mixed woodland, disturbed, roadside, stony or sandy
loam
(= subsp. adscensionis, 989), T, 0.8, Combretum-Commiphora
woodland, rock outcrop, shallow stony
canescens Henrard subsp. ramosa De Winter, 351, 398, 594, H, 0.2-0. 6,
Combretum woodland, dryland, sandy loam, loam
congesta Roem. & Schult. subsp. barbicollis (Trin. & Rupr.) De Winter,
398, 594, 997, 998, T, 0.4— 0.6, Combretum woodland, dryland,
disturbed (roadside, overgrazed), stony or sandy loam, loam
meridionalis Henrard, 610, H, 0.9, Combretum woodland, dryland, rock
outcrop, stony gravel
scabrivalvis Hack, subsp. scabrivalvis, 944, T, 0.5, -, roadside, sandy
loam
stipitata Hack, subsp. graciliflora (Pilg.) Melderis, 391, T, 0.5, Com-
bretum woodland, dryland, sandy loam
Tragus
berteronianus Schult., 325, T, 0.3, Combretum woodland, disturbed
(trampled), dryland, sandy loam
Perotis
patens Gand., §, T, 0.3, Combretum woodland, dryland, sandy
Sporobolus
festivus A. Rich.
(= var. fibrosus Stent), RPE 3464D, H, -, Colophospermum
woodland, -, shallow gravelly
fimbriatus (Trin.) Nees, 933, 935, 937, H, 1.0, mixed woodland, riverine,
dryland, river bed, stony or sandy loam
nitens Stent, 350, 927, 1010, H, 0.2, Combretum woodland, dryland,
sandy
panicoides A. Rich., 936, T, 0.7, mixed woodland, dryland, sandy loam
stapfianus Gand., §, H, 0.2, -, -, -
virginicus (L. ) Kunth, RPE 3463, H. -, -, -
Eragrostis
ciliaris (L.) R. Br„ §, T. 0.3, -, disturbed (garden), sandy
cylindriflora Hochst., 390, 977, T, 0.2-0.4, -, disturbed (roadside), sandy
loam
gummiflua Nees, §, H. 0.3-0. 5, grassland, open parkland, seepline com-
plex, sandy clay, clayey loam
heteromera Stapf, 917, H. 1.5, riverine, grassland, seasonal stream, vlei,
sandy, clay loam, clay
inamoena K. Schum., 946, H, -, grassland, open parkland, seepline
complex, sandy clay
lehmanniana Nees var. lehmanniana, RPE 3464, H, -, -, -
pilosa (L.) P Beauv. *, 892, 1009, T, 0. 2-0.3, -, garden lawn, sandy loam
rigidior Pilg., 934, H, 1.0, mixed woodland, dryland, sandy loam
rotifer Rendle, 321, 607, 912, H, 0.9-1 .5, riverine, river bed, river sand,
coarse river sand
superba Peyr., 316, 938, H, 0.4— 0.5, Combretum & Colophospennum
woodland, dryland, sandy loam
trichophora Coss. & Durieu, 932, H, 0.3, -, disturbed (roadside, old
lands), sandy loam
sp., 613, 947, -, 0.6-1. 5, riverine, river bed, seasonally waterlogged river
sand, sandy loam
Cynodon
dactylon (L. ) Pers., §, +. H, 0.2, riverine, river bank, sand bank, alluvial
sand
Enteropogon
macrostachyus (A. Rich.) Benth., 525, 911, H, 1.0, mixed woodland,
dryland, sandy loam, loam
Chloris
gayana Kunth, 358, H, 0.9-1. 0, riverine, riverbed, river sand
mossambicensis K. Schum., 928, H. 0.4, riverine, seasonal stream, river
& stream bank, clayey loam
roxburghiana Schult., 353, H, 0.7, -, termitarium, sandy clay
Oropetium
capense Stapf, RPE 3464E, H, -, Colophospermum veld, -, shallow gravel
Dactyloctenium
aegyptium (L.) Willd., 561, T, 0.6, open parkland, seepline complex,
garden, loam
geminatum Hack., 1410, H, 0.7, riverine, reed bed, river sand
giganteum Fisher & Schweick., 965, 1645, T. 0. 5-1.0, riverine, outer
edge of river bed, alluvial sand
44
Bothalia24,l (1994)
Pogonarthria
squarrosa (Roem. & Schult.) Pilg ., §, H, 0.2-0.4, Combretum & mixed
woodland, dryland, overgrazed areas, sandy
Diplachne
fusca (L.) P. Beauv. ex Roem. & Schult.. RPE 3464A, H, Colophospermum
veld, -, heavy black turf
Trichoneura
grandiglumis (Nees) Ekman var. grandiglumis, §, +, H, 0. 2-0.3, Com-
bretum woodland, dryland, sandy
Enneapogon
cenchroides {Roem. & Schult. ) C.E. Hubb.. 355, 988, T, 0.3- 0.6, Acacia
woodland, dryland, rock outcrop, shallow stony loam
Schmidtia
pappophoroides Steud., 309. 969 , H, 0.2-0. 5, Combretum woodland,
riverine, dryland, riverbank, sandy, alluvial sand
Fingerhuthia
africanaLe/zm., 312, H, 0.5, Colophospermum woodland, dryland, sandy
Megastachya
mucronata (Poir. ) P. Beauv., +, T, -
CYPERACEAE
Cyperus
articulatus L., 585, H, 1.2, riverine, river bed, river sand
compressusL., 918, 1647, H, 0.5, seasonal stream, stream bed, river sand
difformis L., 595, 612, H, 0.3-0. 7, grassland, riverine, vlei, river bed,
river sand
distans L. f, 1586, H, 1.4, riverine, reed bed, river sand
fastigiatus Rottb., 587, H, 1 .8, riverine, reed bed, river sand
immensus C.B. Clarke, 588, H, 2.7, riverine, reed bed, river sand
iria L., 596, H, 0. 3-0.4, grassland, vlei, sandy
margaritaceus Vahl, +, H, -, -, -
obtusiflorus Vahl var. obtusiflorus, 346B, 920, H, 0.2-0.4, Combretum
and mixed woodland, tree shade in dryland, sandy loam
rupestris Kunth var. rupestris
(= C. rupestris Kunth), 258, H, 0.1, grassland, vlei, black clayey
loam
sexangularis Nees, 320, H, 0.9, riverine, river bed, river sand
sphaerospermus Schrad., §, H. -, -
tenax Boeck., 586, 599, H, 1.4, riverine, river bed, river sand
thomcroftii McClean, 1633, H, 0.3, rock outcrop, edge of small seasonal
rock pool, granite rock
Pycreus
macrostachyos (Lam.) J. Raynal, 597, H, 0.6-0.7, grassland, vlei, sandy
pumilus (L.) Nees
(= subsp. patens (Vahl) Podlech), 609, T, 0. 1, riverine, river bed,
river sand
Mariscus
indecorus (Kunth) Podlech, §, H, -, -, -
rehmannianus C.B. Clarke, 919, T. 0.4, mixed woodland, dryland, sandy
loam
squarrosus (L.) C.B. Clarke, §, H, -, -, -
Kyllinga
alba Nees, 257, H, 0. 1 , grassland, vlei, black clayey loam
Fuirena
ciliaris (L.) Roxb. var. ciliaris, 1117, H, 0.4, open parkland, seepline
complex, waterlogged sandy clayey loam
pubescens (Poir.) Kunth, 625, H, 0.4, grassland, vlei, sandy
Fimbristylis
bisumbellata (Forssk.) Bubani, 1347, H, 0.2-0. 3, riverine, river bed,
alluvial & river sand
ferruginea (L.) Vahl, §, H, 0.5, -, -, -
microcarya F. Mueli, 608, H, 0. 1 -0.2, riverine, river bed, river sand
Bulbostylis
burchellii (Ficalho & Hiem ) C.B. Clarke, 986, H, 0.4, rock outcrop,
seepage area amongst boulders, sandy
hispidula (Vahl) R.W. Haines, 397, H, 0.3, -, garden, sandy loam
Cladium
mariscus (L.)Pohl subsp. jamaicensef Crantz) Kiik., 890. H, 2.0, riverine,
dam shore, alluvial sand, clay
ARECACEAE
Phoenix
reclinata Jacq., $, Mi, 2,0. riverine, seasonal stream, river & stream bank
or bed, alluvial sand, river sand
Hyphaene
coriacea Gaertn.
(= H. natalensis Kuntze), §, Mi, 1.3, -, -
ARACEAE
Sty loch iton
natalensis Schott, 1365, G, 0.5, mixed woodland, Combretum-Conuni-
phora woodland, dryland, sandy or stony loam
COMMELINACEAE
Commelina
africanaL. var. lancispatha C.B. Clarke, 1058, H, 0.3-0. 7, mixed wood-
land, dryland, sandy loam
diffusa Burnt, f. subsp. scandens (C.B. Clarke ) Oberm., 1368, H, 0.6,
riverine, reed bed, river sand
subulata Roth, 1095, T, 0.3, aquatic, seasonal pan, waterlogged clay
Cyanotis
speciosa (L. f) Hassk., 1088, H, 0. 1-0.2, Colophospermum woodland,
bare soil, sandy clay
COLCHICACEAE
Gloriosa
superba L., §, G, 1.3, mixed woodland, dryland, sandy loam
Camptorrhiza
strumosa ( Baker ) Oberm., 1537, G, 0.2, Colophospermum woodland/riv-
erine ecotone, dryland, sandy clayey loam
ASPHODELACEAE (PART A)
Trachyandra
sal tii (Baker) Oberm. var. saltii, 253, 1533, G, 0. 1 , Combretum woodland,
dryland, sandy loam
Anthericum
cooperi Baker, 254, G, 0. 1, Combretum woodland, dryland, sandy loam
galpinii Baker var. galpinii, 373, 1052, 1350, G, 0. 2-0.3, Acacia/Com-
bretum woodland, open parkland, dryland, seepline complex,
stony sandy loam
longistylum Baker, 1216, G, 0.3, open parkland, seepline complex, sandy
clayey loam
HYACINTHACEAE (PART A)
Schizobasis
intricata (Baker) Baker, 1505, 1623, G, 0.3-0. 5, Combretum-Commi-
pltora woodland, dryland, shallow gravel, sandy loam
ERIOSPERMACEAE
Eriospermum
burchellii Baker, 314, G, 0.3, Colophospermum woodland, dryland,
gravel
galpinii Schinz, 617, 1056, G, 0.2, grassland, open parkland, vlei, seepline
complex, loam, sandy clay
luteo-rubrum Baker, §, G, -, -, -, -
ASPHODELACEAE (PART B)
Aloe
lutescens Groenew., §, N, -, -, -, -
marlothii A. Berger subsp. marlothii, §, N, -, -, -, -
vandermerwei Reynolds, 880, N, 1.2, -, yard of entrance gate (planted ?),
sandy, stony
HYACINTHACEAE (PART B)
Albuca
angolensis Welw., 1617, 1635, G, 0.6-2.0, koppie, rock outcrop, shallow
loam, humus-rich loam
Urginea
epigea R.A. Dyer, 1049, G, 1.0-1. 4, mixed woodland, dryland, sandy
loam
sanguineaSc/zhzz, 1624, G,-, Combretum woodland, dryland, sandy loam
Drimia
sp. cf. D.elata7flci7., 1618, G, 0.3, open mixed woodland, dryland, clayey
loam
Dipcadi
glaucum (Ker Gaxvl.) Baker, 1587, G, 0.4, Combretum woodland, dry-
land, shallow sandy or stony loam
gracillimum Baker, 359, G, 0.4— 0.5, Combretum woodland/riverine eco-
tone, river bank, dryland, alluvial sand, stony loam
viride (L.) Moench, 1586, G, 1.0, Combretum woodland, dryland, sandy
loam
Ornithogalum
seineri (Engl. & K. Krause) Oberm., 326, 855, G, 0.2-0.3, Combretum
woodland, dryland, old lands, gravel, sandy loam
Drimiopsis
burkei Baker, §, G, 0.2, Combretum woodland, koppie, dryland shade,
rock outcrop, sandy, shallow
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
45
Ledebouria
apertiflora (Baker) Jessop, 1305, G, 0.2, open parkland, seepline com-
plex, sandy clay
cooperi (Hook, f.) Jessop, §, G, -, -, -, -
marginata (Baker) Jessop, 1254, G, 0.1, Combretum woodland, dryland,
clayey loam
sp., 1509, -, 0.3, mixed woodland, dryland, sandy loam
DRACAENACEAE
Sansevieria
hyacinthoides (L.) Druce, 1372, 1373, H, 0. 3-0.5, koppie, mixed wood-
land, open parkland, rock outcrop, seepline complex (upper
edge), shallow, sandy, sandy clayey loam
pearsonii N.E. Br., 1611, H, 0.3-0. 7, koppie, rock outcrop, sandy loam
ASPARAGACEAE
Protasparagus
africanus (Lam.) Oberm.
(= Asparagus africanus L.), §, G, 0.6, Combretum woodland,
dryland, sandy loam
buchananii (Baker) Oberm.
(= Asparagus buchananii Baker), §, G, 2.0-3. 0, koppie, rock
outcrop, sandy loam
exuvialis (Burch.) Oberm.
(= Asparagus exuvialis Burch.), 376, G, 0.6, Combretum wood-
land, dryland, sandy loam
natalensis (Baker) Oberm.
(= Asparagus falcatus L. var. ternifolius (Baker) Jessop), 1067,
G, 1 .0, Colophospermum woodland, erosion area, gravelly clay
AMARYLLIDACEAE
Scadoxus
multiflorus (Martyn) Raf. subsp. multiflorus, 1257, G, 0.3, mixed wood-
land, termitarium, sandy loam, sandy clayey loam
Boophane
disticha (L.f.) Herb., §, G, 0.5, mixed woodland, Combretum woodland,
dryland, sandy loam
Crinum
buphanoides Welw. ex Baker, §, G, 0.4, open parkland, seepline complex,
clayey loam, clay
graminicola L Verd., §, G, 0.6. Combretum woodland, dryland, sandy
loam
minimum Milne-Redh., 1236, G, 0.2, Combretum woodland, dryland,
sandy loam
Ammocharis
coranica (Ker Gawl.) Herb., 1504, G, 0.3, riverine, river bank, alluvial
sand
Pancratium
tenuifolium Hochst. ex A. Rich., §, G, 0.2, Combretum woodland, dry-
land. sandy loam
HYPOXIDACEAE
Hypoxis
hemerocallidea Fisch. & C.A. Mey.
(= H. rooperi S. Moore), §, G, 0.3, -, -
VELLOZIACEAE
Xerophyta
retinervis Baker, §, Ch, 0.4-0.7, Combretum woodland, dryland, shallow
sandy or gravelly loam
DIOSCOREACEAE
Dioscorea
sylvatica ( Kunth ) Eckl. var. sylvatica, 1287, Ch, 1.5, seasonal stream,
stream bank, shallow, stony
Eulophia
petersii Rchb.f, 1516, H, 1.2, koppie, rock outcrop, shallow leaf litter
and humus
ANGIOSPERMAE-DICOTYLEDONAE
SALICACEAE
Salix
mucronata Thunb. subsp. capensis (Thunb.) Immelman
(= S. capensis Thunb.), 1028, Mi, 3.0, riverine, river bank,
alluvial sand
MORACEAE
Madura
africana (Bureau) Corner, 1035. Mi, 3.0. riverine, river bank, alluvial
sand
Ficus
abutilifolia (Miq.) Miq.
(= F. soldanella Warb. ), 992, Me, 7.0-10.0, koppie, rock outcrop,
stony loam
glumosa (Miq. ) Delile
(= F. sonderi Miq., §, +. Me, -, -, -, -
ingens (Miq.) Miq. var. ingens, 1517, Me, 5.0, riverine cliff, rock outcrop,
shallow, gravelly
sycomorus L„ 1401, Me, 15.0-20.0, riverine, river bank, alluvial sand
URTICACEAE
Pouzolzia
mixta Solms
(= P. hypoleuca Wedd.), 1596, N, 1.5, koppie, rock outcrop,
humus-rich sandy loam
LORANTHACEAE
Plicosepalus
kalachariensis (Schinz) Danser, 1162, Pa, -, woodland. Acacia nigres-
cens, -
SANTALACEAE
Osyridicarpos
schimperianus (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) A. DC., 1612, H, 0.5, seasonal
stream, vertical stream bank, alluvial sand
OLACACEAE
Ximenia
americana L. var. americana, 577, N, 1.5, Combretum woodland, dryland,
loam
caffra Sond. var. caffra, 1742 , N, 1. 2-2.0, Combretum-Commiphora
woodland, seasonal stream, dryland, stream bank thicket, stony
sandy loam, alluvial sand
POLYGONACEAE
Polygonum
aviculare L. *, §, H, -, -, -, -
Persicaria
serrulata (Lag.) Webb & Moq., 600, 1027, 1393, Ch, 0.6-1. 0, riverine,
river bed, river sand, alluvial sand
Oxygonum
sinuatum (Hochst. & Steud. ex Meisn.) Dammer, 368, 1309, 1642, H,
0.2-0.3, -, disturbed (old lands), de-bushed area, sandy loam
CHENOPODIACEAE
Chenopodium
ambrosioides L. *, 943, T, 0.6, riverine, river bed, river sand
schraderianum Roem. & Schult. *, 1418, T, 0.7, riverine, river bed, river
sand
IRIDACEAE
Lapeirousia
masukuensis Vaupel & Schltr. 1345, G, 0.4, open parkland, seepline
complex, sandy clay
sandersonii Baker, §, G, 0.4— 0.5, open parkland, seepline complex, sandy
clay
ORCHIDACEAE
Ansellia
africana Lindl.
(= A. gigantea Rchb. f. var. nilotica (Baker) Summerh.), 1288,
1311, E, 0.6, riverine. Acacia woodland, Diospyros mespili-
formis, Acacia nigrescens, -
AMARANTHACEAE
Hermbstaedtia
odorata (Burch.) T. Cooke var. odorata, 562, Ch, 0.6, Combretum wood-
land, dryland, loam
Sericorema
remotiflora (Hook, f.) Lopr., §, Ch, 0.6, Colophospermum woodland,
dryland, clayey loam
Kyphocarpa
angustifolia (Moq.) Lopr., 1007, H, 1.0, mixed woodland, dryland, sandy
loam
cruciata (Schinz) Schinz, 1187, T, 0.3-0.4, mixed woodland, trampled
veld, clayey loam
Cyathula
cylindricaMoc/., 590, T, 1.0, Combretum woodland, dryland, sandy loam
46
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
lanceolata Schinz
(= C. hereroensis Schinz), 777, Ch, 0.3, -, disturbed (de- bushed),
sandy
Pupalia
lappacea (L.) A. Juss. var. lappacea *
(= P. atropurpurea (Lam.) Moq.), 1160, 1342 , H, 0.4-1. 5, river-
ine, river bank, disturbed (roadside), gravel, sandy loam
Achvranthes
asperaL. var. aspera *, 1159, 1477 , Ch, 0.4-1 .5, riverine, shade of riverine
woodland, alluvial sand
Alternanthera
pungens Htiinb., Bonpl. & Kunth *, 1330. H, 0.03-0.05, disturbed areas,
gravel, sandy loam
Gomphrena
celosioides Mart. *, 1319. H, 0.3, aquatic, seepage below dam, sandy,
stony
NYCTAGINACEAE
Commicarpus
fallacissimus (Heimerl) Heimerl ex Oberm., Schweick. & 1. Verd., 1306,
Ch, 0.2, Combretum woodland, disturbed (trampled area next to
waterhole), sandy clay loam
plumbagineus (Cav.) Standley, §, Ch, 1.2, riverine, river bank, sandy
loam
Boerhavia
diffusa L.*, 283, 285, 1253, Ch. 0.2-0.6, grassland, vlei, disturbed
(garden), sandy clayey loam, loam, clayey loam
AIZOACEAE (PART A)
Limeum
dinteri G. Schellenb., §, H, -, -, -, -
fenestratum (Fenzl) Heimerl var. fenestratum, 942, H, 0.4, -, disturbed
(roadside), gravel
myosotis H. Walter var. confusum Friedrich, §, T, -, -, -, -
pterocarpum (J. Gay) Heimerl var. pterocarpum, 1581 , T, 0.5, Com-
bretum woodland, heavily trampled and overgrazed areas, sandy
loam
sulcatum (Klotzsch) Hutch, var. sulcatum. 280, 622, 1474, H. 0. 1-0.5,
Combretum woodland, dryland, disturbed (garden), roadside,
sandy, sandy loam
AIZOACEAE (PART B )
Gisekia
africana (Lour.) Kuntze var. africana, 941, 1580, T, 0.02-0.05, Com-
bretum woodland, dryland, roadside, sandy loam, gravel
africana (Lour.) Kuntze var. cymosa Adamson, 335, T, 0.3, Combretum
woodland, dryland, sandy
Mollugo
cerviana (L.) Ser. ex DC., 389, T, 0.06-0.1, -, disturbed (garden), sandy
loam
Glinus
bainesii (Oliv.) Pax, 1319, T, 0.3, aquatic, seepage below dam, sandy,
stony
Hvpertelis
salsoloides (Burch.) Adamson var. salsoloides, 364, H, 0.2, Combretum
woodland, dryland, sandy loam
Corbichonia
decumbens (Forssk.) Exell, 377, 1069, Ch, 0.03-0.05, Colophospermum
woodland, dryland, disturbed (roadside), sandy gravel, clay
PORTULACACEAE
Talinum
caffrum ( Thunb .) Eckl. & Zeyh., 1252, G, 0.2, open parkland, seepline
complex, clayey loam
Portulacaria
afra Jacq., §, N, 1 .7, koppie, rock outcrop, sandy, gravelly
Portulaca
oleracea L. *, 1259, Ch, 0.06, -, disturbed (garden), sandy loam
pilosa L, 338, 1583. H, 0.04-0.08, Combretum woodland, koppie, rock
outcrop, disturbed (roadside), shallow, stony, sandy loam
quadrifida L., 1078, T, 0.1, open parkland, seepline complex, sandy clay
MENISPERMACEAE
Cocculus
hirsutus (L. ) Diels *, 1620, L, 2.0, riverine, river bank, shallow loam on
quartzite
Tinospora
fragosaf/. Verd.) I. Verd. & Troupin
(= Desmonemafragosum I. Verd.), §, L, 5.0, koppie, rock outcrop,
sandy
ANNONACEAE
Hexalobus
monopetalus (A. Rich.) Engl. & Diels var. monopetalus, 960, 1627, 1682,
Mi, 2. 0-4.0, koppie, rock outcrop, shallow gravel, sandy loam
PAPAVERACEAE
Argemone
mexicana L.*, 1217, T, 0.6, -, disturbed (old lands, roadside ), sandy loam
ochroleuca Sweet subsp. ochroleuca *
(=A. subfusiformis G. B. Ownbey),iS6,T,0.6, riverine, disturbed
(old lands, roadside), river sand, sandy loam
BRASSICACEAE
Lepidium
africanum (Burnt, f.) DC. subsp. africanum, 1080, T, 0.3, -, disturbed
(garden), sandy loam
CAPPARACEAE
Cleome
angustifolia Forssk. subsp. petersiana (Klotzsch ex Sond.) Kers, 336, T,
0.7, Combretum woodland, dryland, gravelly loam
gynandra L., §, T, 0.5, -, disturbed (old lands), sandy loam
hirta (Klotzsch) Oliv., 1019, T, 0.6-1 .0, riverine, river bank, alluvial sand
maculata (Sond.) Szyszyl.. 1592, T, 0.2-0.3, mixed woodland, dryland,
trampled and overgrazed areas, shallow, sandy
monophylla L., 392, T, 0.2-0. 3, Combretum woodland, dryland, sandy
loam
Capparis
tomentosa Lam., §, +, L, 1.5-10.0, riverine, seasonal stream, river &
stream banks, alluvial sand, loam, clay loam
Boscia
albitrunca (Burch.) Gilg & Gilg-Ben. var. albitrunca
(= Boscia albitrunca (Burch.) Gilg & Gilg-Ben.), 976, Me,
4. 0-6.0, koppie, rock outcrop, stony loam
Maerua
juncea Pax subsp. crustata (Wild) Wild, 1687, 1716, N, 1. 5-2.0, open
parkland, dryland, alluvial sand, sandy loam
parvifolia Pax, 339, 1003, N, 0.6-0.8, Combretum woodland, dryland,
seasonal stream bank, sandy loam, loam
CRASSULACEAE
Cotyledon
barbeyi Schweinf. ex Baker, 1175, H, 0.6, riverine, quartzite cliffs, shal-
low sandy gravel
Kalanchoe
lanceolata (Forssk.) Pers., §, H, 0.6, open parkland, seepline complex,
clayey loam
longiflora Schltr.exJ.M. Wood, 1033, 1173, H, 1.0, koppie, riverine, rock
outcrop, quartzite cliffs, sandy gravel
paniculata Harv., 1038, 1174, 1194, H, 1. 5-2.0, koppie, open parkland,
mixed woodland, rock outcrop, seepline complex, erosion areas,
shallow gravel, sandy loam, clayey loam
rotundifolia (Haw.) Haw., 1480, H, 0.3-0. 5, open Acacia woodland,
seepline complex, sandy loam
Crassula
expansa Dryand. subsp. fragilis (Baker) Toelken, 1475, H, 0.3, open
parkland, seepline complex, sandy loam
VAHLIACEAE
Vahlia
capensis (L.f.) Tlumb. subsp. capensis, 365, H, 0.2, Combretum wood-
land, dryland, sandy loam
capensis (L.f.) Thunb. subsp. vulgaris Bridson var. longiflora (Gand.)
Bridson, 1263, H, 0.2, -, disturbed (de-bushed), sandy loam
NYMPHAEACEAE
Nymphaea
lotus L., 1092, G, -, aquatic, seasonal pan, clay
nouchali Burm.f. var. caerulea (Savigny) Verde.
(= N. caerulea Savigny), 1108, G, -, aquatic, seasonal pan, clay
(= TV. capensis L.), 1107, G, -, aquatic, seasonal pan, clay
FABACEAE
Albizia
anthelmintica (A. Rich.) Brongn., 1619, Mi, 3.0-4.0, riverine, river bank,
sandy loam
brevifolia Schinz, 1412, 1590, Mi, 5.0, koppie, rock outcrop, -
forbesii Benth., 1171, Me, 20.0, open parkland, riverine, seasonal stream,
seepline complex, river bank, sandy clayey loam
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
47
harveyi E. Fourn., 261, 904, Me, 5,0-8. 0, Acacia & mixed woodland,
dryland, seepline complex, sandy loam, loam
Acacia
erubescens Wei w. ex Oliv., 1589, 1622, Me, 5.0-6.0, Combretum-Com-
miphora woodland, riverine, open parkland, dryland, river bank,
seepline complex, shallow gravel, shallow stony loam
exuvialis /. Vercl., 1396, Mi, 1. 5-3.0, mixed woodland, dryland, shallow
stony loam
gerrardii Benth. var. gerrardii, 1352, 1353, 1679, Mi, 3. 0-4.0, mixed
woodland, open parkland, riverine, dryland, seepline complex,
stream bank, sandy loam, sandy clayey loam
grandicornuta Gerstner, +, Me, -, -, -
mellifera ( Vahl) Benth. subsp. detinens (Burch. ) Brenan, 1184, 1715, Me,
6.0-10.0, riverine, mixed woodland, dryland, river bank, river
bed, alluvial sand, clayey loam
nigrescens Oliv., §, +, Me, -, -, -
nilotica(L. I Willd. exDelile subsp. kraussiana (Benth.) Brenan, §, +, Me,
robusta Burch, subsp. clavigera (E. Mey.) Brenan, 1195, Me, 10.0,
riverine, river bank, alluvial sand
schweinfurthii Brenan & Exell var. schweinfurthii, §, L, 10.0, riverine,
river bank, alluvial sand
Senegal (L.) Willd. var. leiorhachis Brenan, §, Me, 6.0, Combretum
woodland, dryland, stony sandy loam
Senegal (L.) Willd. var. rostrata Breitan, 598, Mi, 1 .8—4.5, Combretum -
Acacia woodland, open parkland, dryland, seepline complex,
loam, clayey loam
tortilis (Forssk.) Hayne subsp. heteracantha (Burch.) Brenan, 914, Me,
7.0, riverine. Acacia woodland, river bank, dryland, disturbed
(old lands & cattle kraals), alluvial sand, stony loam, loam
Dichrostachys
cinerea (L.) Wight & Ant. subsp. africana Brenan & Brummitt var.
africana, 388, Mi, 1.8, woodland, shrubveld, dryland, sandy loam
Colophospermum
mopane (J. Kirk, ex Benth.) J. Kirk ex J. Leonard, §, +, Me, 2.0-15.0,
woodland & shrubveld dominant, -, sandy loam, clayey loam
Schotia
brachypetala Sond., §, +, Me. 10.0, riverine, termitarium, river bank,
dryland, sandy clayey loam
capitata Bolle, §, N, 0.5-1 .5, open parkland, seepline complex, clayey
loam
Bauhinia
galpinii N.E. Br., §, +, Mi, 5.0, riverine, river bank, alluvial sand, loam
Cassia
abbreviata Oliv. subsp. beareana (Holmes) Brenan , §, +, Me, 3.0-6.0,
Acacia & mixed woodland, dryland, sandy loam
Chamaecrista
mimosoides (L.) Greene
(= Cassia mimosoides L.), §, Ch, 0.3, Combretum & mixed
woodland, dryland, sandy loam
stricta E. Me v.
(= Cassia quarrei (Ghesq.) Steyaert), 1104, Ch, 0.3, Combretum
woodland, dryland, sandy loam
Senna
italica subsp. arachoides (Burch.) Lock
(= Cassia italica (Mill.) Lam. ex F.W. Andrews subsp. arachoides
(Burch.) Brenan), 366, H, 0.2, Colophospermum-Combretum
woodland, dryland, sandy loam
occidentals (L.) Link *
(= Cassia occidentalis L. ), §, Ch, 1.1, riverine, river bank, sandy
loam
petersiana (Bolle) Lock
(= Cassia petersiana Bolle), §, N, 1.5, roadside, sandy loam
Pterolobium
stellatum (Forssk.) Brenan, 1181 , Mi, 3.0, riverine, river bank, alluvial
sand
Peltophorum
africanum Sond., §, +, Me, 6.0, mixed woodland, dryland, sandy loam
Bolusanthus
speciosus (Bolus) Harms §, +, Me, 8.0, Acacia & mixed woodland,
riverine, seasonal stream, dryland, river & stream bank, sandy
loam
Crotalaria
burkeana Benth., 1089, Ch, 0.4, disturbed (old lands, roadside), sandy
loam
labumifolia L. subsp. australis (Baker f.) Polhill, 1314, Ch, 0.6, -,
disturbed (roadside), sandy loam
monteiroi Taub. ex Baker f. var. galpinii Burtt Davy ex 1. Verd.
(- C. rigidula Baker f.), §, Ch, 1 .0. seasonal stream, stream bank,
sandy loam
schinzii Baker f, 277, 308, 1134, H, 0. 2-1.0, Combretum woodland,
dryland, disturbed (roadside), sandy loam
virgulata Klotzsch subsp. grantiana (Harv. ) Polhill, 575, 1105, H, 0.2-0.3,
Combretum woodland, dryland, disturbed (roadside), sandy
loam, loam
Indigofera
bainesii Baker, 964, H, 0.2, -, disturbed (roadside), stony loam
costata Gud I . & Perr. subsp. macra (E. Mey.) J.B. Gillett
(= /. macra E. Mey.), §, H, 0.5, seasonal stream, stream bank,
sandy loam
fdipes Benth. ex Harv., 1017, 1321, T, 0.5, Combretum woodland,
dryland, disturbed (roadside), gravel, sandy or stony loam
galpinii N.E. Br., 1511, T, 0.3, -, disturbed (garden), stony or sandy loam
lydenburgensis N.E. Br., 1473, Ch, 0.5-0. 6, mixed woodland, open
parkland, seepline complex, sandy loam
Tephrosia
longipes Meisn. subsp. longipes, 881, 1071 , Ch, 0.6-1 .0, riverine, river
bed, disturbed (roadside), river sand, stony loam
polystachya E. Mey. var. latifoiia Harv., §, Ch, 0.4, -, -, -
rhodesica Baker f. var. rhodesica, 982, Ch, 0.4, -, disturbed (de- bushed),
sandy clayey loam
villosa (L.) Pers. subsp. ehrenbergiana(5c/twe/n/ ) Bmmmittv ar. daviesii
Brummitt, 1130, Ch, 1.0, -, disturbed (roadside), gravel, sandy
clay
Mundulea
sericea (Willd.) A. Chev., §, +, Mi, 2.0. open parkland, upper edge of
seepline complex, sandy clayey loam
Sesbania
bispinosa (Jacq.) W. Wight var. bispinosa *, 921, 1135, Mi, 2.0-2. 5,
seasonal stream, stream bed, river sand, silt
sesban (L. ) Merr. subsp. sesban var. nubica Chiov., 1493, H, 2.0, riverine,
river bank, alluvial sand
Ormocarpum
trichocarpum (Taub.) Engl., 524, Mi, 1. 6-2.4. mixed woodland, open
parkland, dryland, seepline complex, stony loam, sandy clayey
loam
Aeschynomene
indicaL., 1166, T, 1.0, seasonal stream, stream bank, alluvial sand
Stylosanthes
fruticosa (Retz.) Alston, 1147, H, 0.3, open parkland, seepline complex,
sandy clayey loam
Zornia
glochidiata DC.. 1124, T, 0.3, -, disturbed (roadside), sandy loam
Dalbergia
melanoxylon Guill. & Perr., 1402, Mi, 3.0, open parkland, riverine, upper
edge of seepline complex, alluvial sand, sandy clayey loam
Lonchocarpus
capassa Rolfe, 341 , Me, 10.0, riverine, woodland, river bank, dryland,
alluvial sand, loam
Xanthocercis
zambesiaca (Baker) Dumaz-le-Grand, 579, Me, 12.0-15.0, riverine,
Combretum-Commiphora woodland, river bank, termitarium,
alluvial sand, clayey loam
Abrus
precatorius L. subsp. africanus Verde., 1115, L, 2.0. riverine, seasonal
stream, river & stream bank, alluvial sand, sandy loam
Erythrina
humeana Spreng., §, N, 1 .5-2.0, riverine, seasonal stream, river & stream
bank, alluvial sand, sandy loam
Rhynchosia
caribaea (Jacq.) DC., 886, L, 1.0, Colophospermum woodland, dryland,
sandy clay
minima (L.) DC. var. prostrata (Harv.) Meikle. 382, H, 0.6, Combretum
woodland, dryland, disturbed (roadside), gravel
sp., 276, -, 0.6, Combretum woodland, dryland, sandy
Eriosema
psoraleoides (Lam.) G. Don, 884, Ch, 2.0, riverine, riverbed, river sand
Vigna
unguiculata (L.) Walp. subsp. unguiculata, 1112, 1643, L. 1. 0-2.0. river-
ine, mixed woodland, river bank, dryland, alluvial sand, sandy
loam
Dolichos
trilobus L. subsp. transvaalicus Verde., 1320, L, 0.6, aquatic, seepage
below dam, deep shade, clayey loam
Macrotyloma
axillare (E. Mey.) Verde, var. axillare, 1123, L, 0.5, Combretum woodland,
dryland, sandy or stony loam
Decorsea
schlechteri (Harms) Verde., 1355, L, 2.0, seasonal stream, woodland,
stream bank, dryland, alluvial & river sand, sandy loam
48
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
GERANIACEAE
Monsonia
angustifoliaE. Mey. ex A. Rich.. 1077. Ch, 1.0, mixed woodland, dryland,
sandy loam
burkeana Planch, ex Harv., 1059. T, 0.3, Combretum woodland, dryland,
sandy loam
glaucaR. Knuth. 1020, 1053, H, 0.2-0.4, Combretum woodland, koppie,
dryland, rock outcrop, stony loam
OXALIDACEAE
Oxalis
corniculata L. *, 1207. H, 0.08, -, disturbed (garden lawn), sandy loam
latifolia Humb.. Bonpl. & Kunth *, 1021, T, 0.2, mixed woodland, deep
shade in dryland, loam
ZYGOPHYLLACEAE
Tribulus
terrestris L., 328, T, 0.2, riverine, river bank, disturbed (roadside, de-
bushed, trampled), sandy loam, loam
zeyheri Sond. subsp. zeyheri, 1004, T, 0.2, -, disturbed (roadside), sandy
loam
BALANITACEAE
Balanites
maughamii Sprague, 1405, Me, 12.0, open woodland, dryland, alluvial
sand, sandy loam
RUTACEAE
Zanthoxylum
capense (Tlmnb.) Harv., §, Mi, 1.2, mixed woodland, dryland thicket,
stony loam
Teclea
pilosa (Engl.) 1. Verd., 1048, N, 1.0, riverine, river bank, sandy clayey
loam
SIMAROUBACEAE
Kirkia
wilmsii Engl., 1413, Me, 6.0, koppie, rock outcrop, shallow sandy
BURSERACEAE
Commiphora
africana (A. Rich.) Engl., 340, 576, 974, Mi, 1. 2-3.0, koppie, Combretum
woodland, rock outcrop, dryland, stony loam, sandy loam
glandulosa Schinz, §, Mi, 4.0, Combretum woodland, dryland, shallow
gravelly
merkeri Engl., 342, Me, 1.2, riverine, river bank, stony loam
mollis (Oliv.) Engl., 957, Me, 5.0, Combretum-Commiphora woodland,
mixed woodland, dryland, shallow stony
pyracanthoides Engl., 993, JdK 10, N, 1 .5, koppie, rock outcrop, sandy
PTAEROXYLACEAE
Ptaeroxylon
obliquum (Thunb.) Radik., §, Mi, 3.0, koppie, rock outcrop, sandy,
gravelly
MELIACEAE
Turraea
obtusifolia Hochst., 887, 922, 1086, Ch, 0.7- 1.0, Colophospermwn,
Combretum, & mixed woodland, dryland, stony, sandy loam,
sandy clay loam
Trichilia
emetica Vahl, §, Me, 10.0, riverine, river bank, alluvial sand
MALPIGHI ACEAE
Triaspis
hypericoides (DC.) Burch, subsp. nelsonii (Oliv.) Immelman, 1349
(= T. nelsonii Oliv.), 773, N, 0.5-1. 5, Combretum & mixed
woodland, dryland, rocky, stony
Sphedamnocarpus
pruriens (Juss.) Szyszyl. subsp. pruriens, 885, 1110, L, 1. 5-2.0, Col-
ophospermum, Combretum, and mixed woodland, dryland, sandy
loam, sandy clayey loam
EUPHORBI ACEAE
Securinega
virosa (Roxb. ex Willd.) Pax & K. Hoffm., 333, N, 1. 5-2.0, riverine,
seasonal stream, roadside, open parkland, river bank, stream
bank, seepline complex, sandy loam, loam, clay loam
Phyllanthus
maderaspatensis L., 347, Ch, 0.5, Combretum woodland, dryland, sandy
pinnatus (Wight) G.L. Webster
(= P. kirkianus Miill.Arg.), 891, 1214, N, 1.5, Colophospermwn
woodland, dryland, stony loam
reticulatus Poir., 1675, Mi, 1. 0-3.0, riverine, seasonal stream, river bank,
stream bank, alluvial sand, sandy loam
Bridelia
cathartica Bertol.f, 1129, 1403, Mi, 2.0-3. 0, riverine, river bank, alluvial
sand
micrantha (Hochst.) Baill., §, +. Mi, 5.0. riverine, river bank, alluvial
sand
mollis Hutch., §, +, Me, 6.0, koppie, rock outcrop, sandy
Croton
megalobotrysM;7//.Arg., 1404, Me, 4.0, riverine, river bank, alluvial sand
Acalypha
indica L.. 940, 1005, 1429, 1585, T, 0.4— 0.5, -, disturbed (roadside,
garden), gravel, sandy loam
villicaulis Hochst.
(=A. petiolaris Hochst.), §, H. 0.3-0. 5, riverine, seasonal stream,
river & stream bank, alluvial sand, sandy loam
Tragia
dioica Sond., 772, H, 0.3, Combretum & mixed woodland, dryland,
disturbed (overgrazed, trampled), sandy
rupestris Sond., 1068, 1113, L, 0.6-1. 5, riverine, seasonal stream, river
& stream bank, alluvial sand, sandy loam
Dalechampia
galpinii Pax, 1116, L, 1.0, mixed woodland, dryland, stony loam
Jatropha
curcas L. *, 1610, Ch, 0.7, koppie, rock outcrop, sandy loam
spicata Pax
(= J. messinica E. A. Bruce), 958, Ch, 0.7, koppie, rock outcrop,
sandy or stony loam
zeyheri Sond. var. zeyheri, 259, 621, 1262, H, 0.2-0.3, Combretum
woodland, dryland, sandy loam
Spirostachys
africana Sond., §, +, Me, 4.0-10.0, riverine, seasonal stream, open
parkland, river & stream bank, seepline complex, clayey loam,
clay
Euphorbia
cooperi N.E. Br. ex A. Berger var. cooperi, §, Mi, 3.0, Combretum-Com-
miphora woodland, dryland, stony sandy loam
guerichiana Pax, 925, N, 1.3, mixed woodland, dryland, stony
schinzii Pax, §, Ch, 0.5, Combretum-Commiphora woodland, dryland,
shallow stony sandy loam
tirucalli L., §, L, 6.0, riverine, rocky river bank (cliff), shallow stony
Chamaesyce
hirta (L. ) Millsp.
(= Euphorbia hirta L.), 1008, H, 0. 1-0.3, -, disturbed (garden,
roadside), sandy loam
neopolycnemoides (Pax & K. Hofftn.) Koutnik
(= Euphorbia neopolycnemoides Pax & K. Hoffm. ), 1094, H, 0.3,
koppie, rock outcrop, loam
ANACARDI ACEAE
Selerocarya
birrea (A. Rich.) Hochst. subsp. caffra (Sond.) Kokwaro
(= S. caffra Sond.), §, +, Me, 3.0-15.0, Acacia & Combretum
woodland, dryland, sandy loam
Lannea
schweinfurthii (Engl.) Engl. var. stuhlmanni (Engl.) Kokwaro
(= L. stuhlmannii (Engl. ) Engl.), §, Me, 8.0, Combretum & mixed
woodland, dryland, sandy loam
Ozoroa
paniculosa (Sond.) R. Fern. <£ A. Fern. var. paniculosa, 895, 1332, JdK
8, Mi, 2. 0-4.0, mixed woodland, dryland, stony loam
Rhus
gueinzii Sond, 980, Mi, 2.0-4. 0, riverine, seasonal stream, river & stream
bank, alluvial sand, sandy loam
pentheri Zahlbr., 1140, Mi, 1.0, -, termitarium, sandy clay
POLYGALACEAE
Polygala
sphenoptera F resen., 1146, H, 0.5, Combretum woodland, dryland, sandy
loam
CELASTRACEAE
Maytenus
heterophylla (Eckl. & Zeyh.) N. Robson, 893, 1057, Mi, 2.0-3 .0, riverine,
seasonal stream, open parkland, mixed woodland, river & stream
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
49
bank, seepline complex, dryland, alluvial sand, sandy loam,
sandy clay
senegalensis (Lam.) Exell, §, +, JdK 21. Mi, 1. 0-2.5, riverine, seasonal
stream, river & stream bank, alluvial sand, sandy loam
Cassine
aethiopica Thunb. §, +, Mi, -
burkeana (Sond.) Kuntze. 1044, Mi, 2.0-3. 0, riverine, seasonal stream,
river & stream bank, sandy loam
transvaalensis (Burn Davy) Codd, 1186, Me, 6. 0-8.0, mixed woodland,
koppie, dryland, rock outcrop, sandy loam
Hippocratea
longipetiolata Oliv., §, +, L, 3.0, koppie, seasonal stream, rock outcrop,
stream bank, termitarium, shallow stony & sandy, sandy clay
SAPINDACEAE
Cardiospermum
corindum L., 1015, 1064, L, 1. 0-2.0, Combretum & mixed woodland,
dryland, stony loam
Pappea
capensis Eckl. & Zeyh., §, +, Mi, 4.0, koppie, open parkland, rock
outcrop, seepline complex, sandy, gravelly, clayey loam
Dodonaea
angustifolia L.f.
(= D. viscosa Jacq. var. angustifolia Benth.), 1628, Mi, 3. 0^1.0,
riverine, river bed, river sand
RHAMNACEAE
Ziziphus
mucronata Willd. subsp. mucronata, §, +, Me, 6.0, mixed woodland,
dryland, sandy loam
Berchemia
discolor (Klotzsch) Hemsl., 961. 1036, Me, 3. 0-6.0, koppie, riverine,
rock outcrop, river bank, alluvial sand, sandy
zeyheri (Sond.) Grubov, +, Me, -, -, -, -
VITACEAE
Rhoicissus
tridentata (L.f.) Wild & R.B. Drumm. subsp. cuneifolia (Eckl. & Zeyh.)
N.R. Urton, 1158, L, 3.0, riverine, river bank, alluvial sand
Cissus
comifolia (Baker) Planch.
(= C. lonicerifolia C.A. Sm.), §, N, 1.2, Combretum & mixed
woodland, dryland, sandy loam
quadrangularis L., §, L, 4.0. Combretum & mixed woodland, dryland,
sandy loam
rotundifolia (Forssk.) Vahl. 1032. L, 3.0, koppie, rock outcrop, sandy
Cyphostemma
puberulum (C.A. Sm.) Wild & R.B. Drumm., 1111. 1114, L. 1.5, mixed
woodland, riverine, dryland, river bank, alluvial sand, sandy
loam, clayey loam
schlechteri (Gilg & M. Brandt) Desc. ex Wild & R.B. Drumm.. 1258, L,
- , -, termitarium, red sandy loam
TILIACEAE
Corchorus
asplenifolius Burch., 1639, H, 0.2, Combretum woodland, dryland, sandy
loam
confusus Wild, 281, H, 0.2, Combretum woodland, dryland, sandy
Grewia
bi color Juss., 310, 501, 1398. PJM 02, 03. 04, JdK 28, 29, Mi, 1. 2-3.0,
Combretum & Combretum-Commiphora woodland, dryland,
shallow gravel, stony loam, sandy loam
flavaDC., 279, Mi, 1.5, Combretum woodland, dryland, sandy
flavescens Juss. var. flavescens, JdK 25, 26, §, +. Mi, 2.0- 3.0, Com-
bretum-Commiphora woodland, dryland, shallow gravel
hexamita Burret, 252, Mi, 1. 5-3.0, Combretum woodland, dryland, stony
loam
monticola Sond., +, Mi, -, -, -, -
subspathulata N.E. Br.. 1397, PJM 01, JdK 27, Mi. 2.0, Combretum &
Combretum-Commiphora woodland. -, shallow gravel, sandy
loam
sulcata Mast., 1026, 1414, Mi. 1.0-1. 5, riverine, river bank, alluvial sand
villosa Willd., 999, N, 0.7, Acacia & mixed woodland, dryland, termitar-
ium, sandy clayey loam
Triumfetta
rhomboideayao/., 1640. Ch, 1.5, riverine, river bank, alluvial sand
austro-africanum Hochr., 275, 1055, H, 0.3-0.4, Combretum & mixed
woodland, dryland, sandy loam
englerianum Ulbr., 374, H, 0.5, -, termitarium, loam
ramosum (Cav.) Guill. &Perr., 1641, H, 1.5, riverine, river bank, alluvial
sand
Sida
chrysantha Ulbr., 282. 1054, 1133, 1265, H, 0.3-0.5, Combretum &
mixed woodland, dryland, disturbed (roadside), gravelly loam,
sandy loam, sandy clayey loam
cordifolia L., 951 , 1144, H, 0.5-0.6, koppie, rock outcrop, disturbed (old
lands), course gravel, sandy loam
rhombifolia L., 1334, H, 0.4, riverine, river bed, river sand
Pavonia
burchellii (DC.) R.A. Dyer, 619, 906. 1051. 1083, H, 0.3-0.6, Acacia,
Combretum, & mixed woodland, dryland, termitarium, sandy
loam, loam, clayey loam
Hibiscus
calyphyllus Cav., 1081 , H, 0.4, open parkland, seepline complex, sandy
clay
cannabinusL., 1018, 1163, H, 1.7, seasonal stream, stream bed, river sand
coddii Exell, 1614. H, 1.0, koppie, rock outcrop, shallow sandy
engleri K. Schum., 354, 1367, H, 0. 7-1.0, koppie, riverine, rock outcrop,
river bank, shallow sandy loam
meyeri Harv. subsp. meyeri, 1261, H. 1.0, Combretum woodland, dry-
land, sandy loam
micranthus Lf, 251 . H, 0.9, Combretum woodland, dryland, stony loam
praeteritus R.A. Dyer, 385, 874, 1099, H, 1. 0-2.0, riverine, seasonal
stream, river & stream bank, sandy loam, loam
pusillus Thunb., 1087, H. 0.3, Combretum & mixed woodland, dryland,
sandy clayey loam
schinzii Giirke, 1149, H, 0.1, -, disturbed (old lands, roadside), sandy
loam
sidiformis BailL, 1340, H, 0.3, -, disturbed (roadside), gravel, sandy loam
upingtoniae Giirke, 1085, L, 0.4, mixed woodland, dryland, sandy clayey
loam
Gossypium
herbaceum L. subsp. africanum ( Watt) Vollesen
(= var. africanum (Watt) Hutch. & R.L.M. Ghose), 873, N, 1.5,
mixed woodland, dryland, sandy loam
BOMBACACEAE
Adansonia
digitataZ.., §, Me, 15.0, Acacia woodland, dryland, sandy loam
STERCULIACEAE
Melhania
acuminata Mast. var. acuminata, §, Ch, 0.5-0. 6, Colophospermum wood-
land, disturbed (overgrazed & trampled), sandy, gravel
forbesii Planch, ex Mast., §, +. Ch, 0.6. Combretum, Acacia, & mixed
woodland, riverine, dryland, disturbed (overgrazed & trampled),
river bank, sandy loam
prostrata DC., 379, H, 0.3, -, disturbed (roadside), gravel
rehmannii Szyszyl. 1714, Ch, 0.3-0.7, Combretum woodland, dryland,
shallow gravel
Dombeya
rotundifolia (Hochst.) Planch, var. rotundifolia, §, Mi, 3.0, koppie,
riverine, seasonal stream, rock outcrop, river & stream bank,
sandy loam
Hermannia
glanduligera K. Schum.
(= H. viscosa sensu Burtt Davy non Hiem), 1400, H, 0.6, -,
disturbed (roadside), dryland, sandy loam
modesta (Ehrenb.) Mast., 278. 1125, T. 0. 2-0.5, Combretum woodland,
dryland, disturbed (roadside), stony, sandy loam
Waltheria
indica L.. 605, 1126, H, 0.4— 0.5, Combretum woodland, dryland, dis-
turbed (roadside), stony, sandy loam
Sterculia
rogersii N.E. Br., 955, Mi, 3.0, koppie. rock outcrop, shallow stony loam
OCHNACEAE
Ochna
inermis (Forssk.) Schweinf, 991, 1045, Mi, 2.0, koppie, rock outcrop,
stony loam
pretoriensis E. Phillips, +, Mi, -, -, -, -
MALVACEAE
Abutilon
angulatum ( Guill. & Perr. ) Mast. var. angulatum, §, T, 1 .2, riverine, river
bank, sandy, loam
CLUSIACEAE
Garcinia
livingstonei T. Anderson, 1415, Me, 15.0, riverine, river bank, alluvial
sand
50
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
ELATINACEAE
Bergia
decumbens Planch, ex Harv., 1615 , H, 0. 1-0.2, aquatic, dam shores, clay
PLUMBAGINACEAE
Plumbago
zeylanica L., §, H, 1.2, riverine, river bank, sandy loam
VIOLACEAE
Hybanthus
capensis (Thunb.) Engl., 255, H, 0.3, Combretum woodland, dryland,
loam
enneaspermus (L.) F. Muell. *, 1082, 1255, T, 0. 1 , Combretum woodland,
disturbed (de-bushed), dryland, sandy loam, sandy clayey loam
TURNERACEAE
Tricliceras
glanduliferunt (Klotzsch) R. Fern.
(= Wormskioldia glandulifera Klotzsch ), 1339, T, 0.3, -, disturbed
(roadside), sandy loam
laceratum (Oberm.) Oberm.
(= Wormskioldia lacerata Oberm.), 620, T, 0.2, Combretum
woodland, -, sandy, stony
longipedunculatum ( Mast .) R. Fern. var. longipedunculatum
(= Wormskioldia longipedunculata Mast.), §, T, 0.3, -, disturbed
(roadside), gravel, sandy loam
SAPOTACEAE
Manilkara
mochisia (Baker) Dubard, 362, Mi, 2. 5-5.0, riverine, open parkland,
river bank, seepline complex, sandy loam, clayey loam
EBENACEAE
Euclea
divinorum Hiern, 1042, Mi, 2.0-3. 0, seasonal stream, open parkland,
stream bank, seepline complex, sandy-loam, sandy clayey loam
natalensis A. DC. subsp. natalensis, 1046, Mi, 2.0, riverine, seasonal
stream, river & stream bank, alluvial sand, sandy loam
undulata Thunb. var. undulata, 375, 1331, N, 1. 0-2.0, Combretum &
mixed woodland, dryland, sandy loam, loam
Diospyros
mespiliformis Hochst. ex A. DC., 399, Me, 15.0-20.0, riverine, seasonal
stream, river & stream bank, termitarium, sandy loam, clayey
loam
PASSIFLORACEAE
Adenia
digitata (Harv.) Engl., 1507, L, 1.5, Combretum woodland, dryland,
shallow stony loam
hastata (Harv.) Schinz var. hastata, 1354, L, 2.0, Combretum woodland,
dryland, red sandy loam
OLEACEAE
Jasminum
fluminense Veil., 1063, L, 0.6, seasonal stream, stream bank, sandy loam
multipartitum Hochst., 344, L, 4.0, Combretum woodland, dryland,
gravel
sp. cf. J. stenolobum Rolfe, 1534, N, -, koppie, rock outcrop, gravel
THYMELAEACEAE
Gnidia
rubescens B. Peterson. 319, H, 0.4, Combretum woodland, dryland,
disturbed (roadside), gravel
LYTHRACEAE
Ammannia
senegalensis Lam. ex Poir, 1164, T, 0.6, seasonal stream, stream bed,
damp river sand
COMBRETACEAE
Combretum
apiculatum Solid, subsp. apiculatum, §, +, Mi, 3.0-5. 0, woodland domi-
nant, dryland, sandy loam
erythrophyllum (Burch.) Sond., 1417, Me, 5.0, riverine, river bank, river
bed, alluvial & river sand
hereroense Schinz, 343, Mi, 3.0-5.0, Combretum woodland, riverine,
seasonal stream, dryland, river & stream bank, gravel, alluvial
sand, sandy loam
imberbe Wawra, §, +, Me, 10.0, mixed woodland, riverine & seasonal
stream, dryland, river & stream bank, clayey loam, clay
microphyllum Klotzsch
(= C. paniculatum Vent, subsp. microphyllum (Klotzsch)
Wickens), §, L, 10.0, riverine, river bank, alluvial sand
mossambicense (Klotzsch) Engl., 323, Mi, 1.5-2. 5, riverine, Combretum
woodland, river bank, stony or sandy loam
zeyheri Sond., 262, Me, 4. 5-6.0, mixed woodland, dryland, loam
Terminalia
prunioides M.A. Lawson. 317, Me, 6.0, Combretum woodland, dryland,
shallow stony loam
sericea Burch, ex DC., §, +, Me, 6.0, Combretum woodland, open
parkland, upper edge of seepline complex, sandy loam
MYRTACEAE
Syzygium
guineense (Willd.) DC., §, Me. 10.0, riverine, river bed, river sand
ONAGRACEAE
Ludwigia
octovalvis ( Jacq.) P.H. Raven subsp. octovalvis, 1128, 1338, H, 1.0,
riverine, river bed, wet river sand
polycarpa Short & Peter ex Ton: & A. Gray, 1165, T, 0.9, seasonal stream,
stream bed, river sand
stolonifera (Guill. & Perr.) P.H. Raven, 1535, H, 0.1-0. 2, aquatic, river
bed, mud
AP1ACEAE
Steganotaenia
araliacea Hochst., 1613, Mi, 4.0, koppie, rock outcrop, loam
LOGANIACEAE
Strychnos
madagascariensis Poir., 981, JdK 5, Mi, 1 .5-3.5, Combretum woodland,
koppie, dryland, rock outcrop, gravel, stony loam, sandy
spinosa Lam., 1406, Mi, 3.0, open woodland, dryland, alluvial sand
Nuxia
oppositifolia (Hochst.) Benth., 1336, 1409, Mi, 3. 0-4.0, riverine, seasonal
stream, river & stream bed, river sand, sandy loam
GENTIANACEAE
Enicostema
hyssopil'olium (Willd.) I. Verd., 1079, H, 0.1, open parkland, seepline
complex, sandy clay
APOCYNACEAE
Carissa
bispinosafLJDey/i exBrenan subsp. bispinosa, §, +, N, 1.0-1 .7, riverine,
seasonal stream, river & stream bank, sandy loam, loam
Adenium
multiflorum Klotzsch
(= A. obesum (Forssk.) Roem. & Schult. var. multiflorum
(Klotzsch) Codd), §, +, N, 0.5-1. 2, koppie, open parkland, rock
outcrop, seepline complex, sandy, sandy clay loam
Pachypodium
saundersii N.E. Br., 962, N, 0.7-1. 2, koppie, rock outcrop, sandy loam
Strophanthus
gerrardii Stapf 1303, L, 7.0, riverine, seasonal stream, river & stream
bank, alluvial sand
PERIPLOCACEAE
Cryptolepis
obtusa N.E. Br., §, L, 1.3- 1.8, riverine, river bed (reed bed), river sand
Stomatostemma
monteiroae (Oliv.) N.E. Br, 1329, Ch, 0.4, koppie, rock outcrop, seepline
complex, loam, clay
Raphionacme
burkei N.E. Br., 1625, 1626, G, 0.2-0.3, Combretum woodland, dryland,
sandy loam
galpinii Schltr., 1593, G, 0. 1-0.2, Combretum woodland, dryland, sandy
loam
monteiroae (Oliv.) N.E. Br., §, G, -, -
sp., 1579, 1598, -, 1 .0, koppie, rock outcrop (dolerite), loam, humus-rich
loam
ASCLEPIADACEAE
Schizoglossum
sp., 1264, H, 0.2, Combretum-Acacia woodland, dryland, clay loam
Kanahia
laniflora (Forssk.) R. Br, 1377, H, 1.0, riverine, river bed river sand
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
51
Stenostelma
capense Schltr.
(= Schizoglossum capense (Schltr.) H. Huber), 337, G.0.1, Com-
bretum woodland, dryland, shallow sandy
Asclepias
fruticosa L., §, H, 1.0, riverine, river bed. river sand
Sarcostemma
viminale (L.) R. Br., §, L, 4.0, mixed woodland, dryland, sandy loam
Secamone
parvifolia (Oliv.) Bullock, 1308 , L, 0.05, riverine, river bank, alluvial
sand
Ceropegia
mafekingensis (N.E. Br.) R.A. Dyer, 1536, G, 0.3, Colophospermum
shrubveld, dryland, sandy clayey loam
rendallii N.E. Br., 1170, G, 1.5, seasonal stream, stream bank thicket,
sandy gravelly loam
Stapelia
gettliffei Pott-Leend.. 1599, Ch, 0.2, Combretum-Commiphora wood-
land, dryland, shallow sandy & stony
gigantea N.E. Br., §, Ch, 0.3, open riverine shrubveld, riverbank, sandy
loam
Orbea
maculata (N.E. Br.) L.C. Leach, 1602, Ch, 0. 1-0.2, Combretum-Com-
miphora woodland, dryland, shallow sandy & stony
Pachycymbium
rogersii (L. Bolus) M.G. Gilbert
(= Caralluma rogersii (L. Bolus) E.A. Druce & R.A. Dyer), §,
Ch, 0.2-0.3, open parkland, seepline complex, clayey loam
Huernia
kirkii N.E. Br., §, Ch, 0.1, Colophospermum woodland, dryland, red
sandy loam
Pergularia
daemia (Forssk.) Chiov. var. daemia, 1161, L, 2.0, riverine, disturbed
(roadside), stony sandy loam
Fockea
angustifolia K. Schum., 1427, 1600, G, 0. 2-0.4, open Combretum &
Colophospermum woodland, dryland, shallow stony, clay loam,
clay
CONVOLVULACEAE
Evolvulus
alsinoides (L.) L. var. linifolius (L.) Baker, 348, H. 0.1, Combretum
woodland, dryland, sandy
Seddera
suffruticosafSc/n'nzj Hallierf. §, H, 0.4, mixed woodland, dryland, sandy
loam
Merremia
kentrocaulos (C.B. Clarke) Rendle, §, L, 2.0, Combretum woodland,
dryland, gravel, loam
palmata Hallierf., §, L, 1 .0, Colophospermum woodland, dryland, sandy
loam
tridentata (L.) Hallier f. subsp. angustifolia (Jacq.) Ooststr. var. an-
gustifolia, 979, H, 0.06, -. disturbed (roadside), sandy loam
Ipomoea
albivenia (Lindl.) Sweet, §, L, 6.0, riverine, seasonal stream, open park-
land, river & stream bank, seepline complex, clayey loam
arachnosperma Welw., §, L. 1.2, Combretum woodland, dryland, sandy
loam
bolusiana Schinz subsp. bolusiana, §, H, 0.1, Combretum & mixed
woodland, dryland, sandy loam
coptica (L.) Roth ex Roem. & Schult. var. coptica, 1139, H, 0.05, Com-
bretum woodland, disturbed (roadside), sandy
crassipes Hook., 346A. 723, 1154, H, 0.05-0.2, Combretum & mixed
woodland, dryland, disturbed (roadside), sandy, stony sandy loam
hochstetteri House, 1114A, L, 2.0, riverine, mixed woodland, riverbank,
dryland, alluvial sand, sandy loam
magnusiana Schinz var. eenii (Rendle) A. Meeuse, 1013, L, 0.1, open
mixed woodland, dryland, stony loam
magnusiana Schinz var. magnusiana, 1114, L, 2.0, riverine, mixed wood-
land, river bank, dryland, alluvial sand, sandy loam
obscura (L.) Ker Gawl. var. fragilis (Choisy) A. Meeuse, 1351, L, 0.1,
Combretum woodland, dryland, shallow stony
sinensis (Desr.) Choisy subsp. blepharosepala (Hochst. ex A. Rich.)
Verde., §, L, 1.3, Combretum woodland, dryland, sandy clayey
loam
BORAGINACEAE
Cordia
monoica Roxb., 1597
(= C. ovalis R. Br. ex DC.), 1119, 1152, JdK 16, Mi, 2.0-4.5, open
parkland, koppie, closed riverine woodland, seepline, termitar-
ium, rock outcrop, sandy humus-rich loam, sandy clay loam,
clayey loam
Ehretia
amoena Klotzsch, 722, 894, Mi, 1. 3-2.0, open woodland, seasonal
stream, dryland, stream bank, stony, sandy loam
obtusifolia Hochst. ex DC., 1233, N, 2.0, Combretum-Terminalia wood-
land, dryland, shallow stony
rigida (Thunb.) Druce, §, N, 0.2-0. 6, open parkland. Acacia woodland,
seepline complex, dryland, sandy clayey loam
Heliotropium
lineare (A. DC.) Giirke, §, T, 0.3, -, -, -
ovalifolium Forssk., §, H, -, -, -
steudneri Vatke, 274, H, 0. 2-0.4, Acacia woodland, disturbed (over-
grazed & trampled), sandy loam
strigosum Willd., 907 , T, 0.3, -, disturbed (roadside), gravel
VERBENACEAE
Verbena
bonariensis L. *, H, 1.4, grassland, vlei margin, clay loam
Lantana
rugosa Thunb., 1070, Ch, 0.6-0. 8, mixed woodland, dryland, sandy loam
Lippia
javanica (Bunn, f.) Spreng., §, N, 1.0-1. 3, riverine, river bank, alluvial
sand
Phyla
nodi fl ora (L.) Greene var. nodiflora, 1343, H, 0.06, aquatic, dam seepage,
sandy clay
Plexipus
hederaceus (Sond.) R. Fern. var. hederaceus
(= Chascanum hederaceum (Sond.) Moldenke var. hederaceum ),
770, H. 0.3, Combretum woodland, dryland, stony, sandy
incisus (H. Pearson) R. Fern.
(= Chascanum incisum (H. Pearson) Moldenke), §, H, 0.3, Col-
ophospermum woodland, dryland, sandy loam
pinnatifidus(L./) R. Fern. var. racemosus (Schinz ex Moldenke) R. Fern.
(= Chascanum pinnatifidum (L. f.) E. Mey. var. racemosum
Schinz ex Moldenke), 520, 1289, H, 0.4— 0.5, Colophospennum
woodland, disturbed (de-bushed), shallow stony loam, loam
Priva
meyenJaub. & Spach var. meyeri, §, H, 1.0, riverine, river bank, alluvial
sand
Duranta
erecta L. *
(= D. repens L.), §, Ch, 3.0, -, -, -
Clerodendrum
tematum Schinz var. tematum
(= C. ternatum Schinz var. lanceolatum (Giirke) Moldenke), §,
Ch, 0.3, koppie, rock outcrop, sandy, gravelly
LAMIACEAE
Leonotis
nepetifolia (L.) R. Br., 995. T, 1.5, seasonal stream, stream bank, clayey
loam
Leucas
neuflizeana Courbon, §, H. 0.3-0.4, Combretum woodland, dryland,
sandy loam
sexdentata Skan, 1000, 1106, H, 0.2-0.4, Combretum & open woodland,
dryland, disturbed (roadside), stony sandy loam
Tetradenia
riparia (Hochst.) Codd
(= Iboza riparia (Hochst.) N.E. Br.), §, N. 1. 2-2.0, riverine, river
bank, rocky sandy loam
Endostemon
tereticaulis (Poir.) M.R. Ashby, 1584, H, 0.3, Combretum woodland,
dryland, sandy loam
Plectranthus
tetensis (Baker) Agnew, 953, 1472, 1603. H, 0.05-0.12, koppie, Acacia
woodland, rock outcrop, seepline complex, sandy loam, loam,
clayey loam
xerophilus Codd, §, H, 2.0, koppie, rock outcrop, stony loam
Hoslundia
opposita Vahl, 1337, H, 2.0, seasonal stream, stream bank, sandy loam
Hemizvgia
elliottii (Baker) M. Ashby, 306, 623, 1327. 1335, H. 0.4-0. 5, Combretum
woodland, koppie, dryland, rock outcrop, gravelly, stony, sandy
petrensis (Hiem) M. Ashby, §, H, 0.3-0.4, Combretum woodland, dry-
land, gravelly, stony
Ocimum
canum Sims, §, H, 0.4, Combretum & Acacia woodland, dryland, sandy
loam
52
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
Becium
filamentosum (Forssk.) Chiov.
(= B. knyanum (Vatke) N.E. Br. ex Broun & R.E. Massey), §, H,
0.5, Combretum & Colophospermum woodland, dryland, sandy
loam
Orthosiphon
suffrutescens (Thonn.) J.K. Morton, §, H, 0.5, Colophospermum wood-
land, riverine, dryland, river bank, alluvial sand, gravelly, sandy
loam
SOLANACEAE
Solarium
coccineum Jcicq., 1084, Ch, 0.4-0. 5, open parkland, seepline complex,
disturbed (overgrazed & trampled), sandy clay
incanum L„ 371 , Ch, 1.3, -, disturbed (old lands), sandy loam
panduriforme E. Mey., 250, Ch, 0.5, -, disturbed (overgrazed, trampled,
& roadside), gravel, sandy loam
Datura
stramonium L. *, §, T, 1.2, riverine, river bed, river sand
SCROPHULARIACEAE (PART A)
Aptosimum
lineare Marloth & Engl., 614, H, 0.2, Combretum woodland, dryland,
sandy loam
Peliostomum
leucorrhizum E. Mey. ex Benth. var. leucorrhizum
(= P. leucorrhizum E. Mey. ex Benth.), 523, H, 0.4, Combretum
woodland, dryland, stony loam
SCROPHULARIACEAE (PART B)
Buchnera
reducta Hiern, 1132, 1148, H, 0.3-0.4, open parkland, seepline complex,
sandy clayey loam, waterlogged clayey loam
Cycnium
adonense E. Mey. ex Benth. subsp. adonense, §, H, 0.1, Combretum
woodland, dryland, sandy loam
Striga
asiatica (L.)Kuntze, 1145, T, 0.2, open parkland, seepline complex, sandy
clayey loam
gesnerioides (Willd.) Vatke ex Engl., 1120, T, 0.4, Combretum woodland,
dryland, stony sandy loam
BIGNONIACEAE
Rhigozum
zambesiacum Baker, §, +, Mi, 1 .5-2.5, Acacia, Combretum, & mixed
woodland, dryland, rock outcrop, shallow loam
PEDALIACEAE
Pterodiscus
aurantiacus Welw., 372, H, 0.2, Combretum woodland, disturbed (old
lands), dryland, sandy loam
luridus Hook, f, 1061, H, 0.3, open parkland, seepline complex, sandy
clayey loam
Har pagophytu m
zeyheri Decne. subsp. zeyheri, 367, H, 0.1, Combretum woodland, dry-
land, sandy loam
Holubia
saccata Oliv., 883, 1582, T, 0. 3-0.4, Combretum woodland, disturbed
(overgrazed, roadside), stony sandy loam
Sesamum
alatum Thonn., 1016, T, 1.0, Combretum woodland, disturbed (over-
grazed, roadside), stony
Ceratotheca
triloba (Bernh.) Hook.f, 882, 1006, T, 1.0, Combretum & mixed wood-
land, disturbed (overgrazed & roadside), stony sandy loam
Dicerocaryum
eriocarpum (Decne.) Abels
(= D. zanguebarium (Lour.) Merr. subsp. zanguebarium), §, H,
0.1,-, disturbed (roadside, trampled river bank), sandy, gravelly
LENTIBULARIACEAE
Utricularia
stellaris L.f, 1024, T, 0.05, aquatic, seasonal pan, clay
ACANTHACEAE
Thunbergia
negiecta Solid. , 356, 1060, H, 0.2-0.6, riverine. Acacia & mixed wood-
land, dryland, sandy loam, loam
Dischoriste
rogersii S. Moore, 1155, Ch, 0.3, Acacia, Combretum, & mixed wood-
land, dryland, rock outcrop, disturbed (roadside), shallow sandy
loam, sandy clayey loam
Ruellia
patula Jacq., 345, 1050, 1256, 1260, H, 0. 1-0.3, Combretum woodland,
dryland, disturbed (overgrazed & de-bushed), stony loam, sandy
loam, sandy clayey loam
Crabbea
velutina S. Moore, 1065, H, 0.2, mixed woodland, dryland, sandy loam
Barleria
affinis C.B. Clarke, 972, H, 0.6, koppie, rock outcrop, stony
crossandriformis C.B. Clarke. 1023, H, 0.6, koppie, rock outcrop
elegans S. Moore ex C.B. Clarke, 1141, H, 0.6, seasonal stream, stream
bank, sandy loam
lancifolia T. Anderson, 956, 1093, 1131, H, 0.4-0. 7, koppie, mixed
woodland, rock outcrop, dryland, stony sandy loam, loam
senensis Klotzsch, 923, H, 0.7, mixed woodland, dryland, stony, shallow
Blepharis
aspera Oberm., 973, H, 0.3, koppie, rock outcrop, stony
Crossandra
mucronata Lindau, §, H, 0.3, open parkland, seepline complex, clayey
loam, clay
Hypoestes
aristata ( Vahl ) Sol. ex Roem. & Schult. var. aristata
(= H. verticillaris (L. f.) Sol. ex Roem. & Schult.), 1395, 1478,
H, 0.3, riverine, deep shade on river bank, alluvial sand, loam
Rhinacanthus
xerophilus A. Meeuse, 1333, H, 0.4— 0.5, Combretum woodland, shade in
dryland, sandy loam
Justicia
flava (Vahl) Vahl, 357, H, 0.3, Acacia woodland, dryland, loam
protracta (Nees) T. Anderson subsp. protracta, 1476, H, 0.3, riverine,
shade on river bank, alluvial sand
Monechma
divaricatum (Nees) C. B. Clarke, 952, H, 0.4, koppie, rock outcrop, loam
RUBIACEAE
Kohautia
caespitosa Schnizl ■ subsp. brachyloba (Sond.) D. Mantell
(= K. caespitosa Schnizl. var. delagoensis (Schinz) Bremek.),
394, T, 0.5, Combretum woodland, dryland, sandy loam
cynanchia DC.
(= K. omahekensis ( K. Krause ) Bremek. ), 395, T, 0.4, Combretum
& Colophospermum woodland, dryland, loam
virgata (Willd.) Bremek., 393, H, 0.4, Combretum woodland, dryland,
sandy loam
Agathisanthemum
bojeri Klotzsch subsp. bojeri
(= subsp. australe Bremek. var. australe ), 1001, H, 0.3, -, dis-
turbed (roadside), sandy loam
sp., 578, -, 0.3, Combretum woodland, dryland, sandy
Pentodon
pentandrus (Schumach. & Thonn.) Vatke var. minor Bremek., 1348, T,
0.3, riverine, river bed, damp river sand
Breonadia
salicina (Vahl) Hepper & J.R.I. Wood
(= Adina microcephala (Delile) Hiern var. galpinii (Oliv.) Hiern,
§, + , Me, 1 5.0-20.0, riverine, river bed, river sand amongst rocks
Gardenia
volkensii K. Schum. subsp. spatulifolia (Stapf & Hutch.) Verde.
(= G. spatulifolia Stapf & Hutch.), §, +, Mi, 3. 0-4.0, Acacia,
Combretum, & mixed woodland, dryland, shallow gravelly &
sandy
Tricalysia
junodii (Schinz) Brenan var. junodii
(= T. allenii (Stapf) Brenan var. australis (Schweick.) Brenan),
959, 994, N, 1.0-1. 5, koppie, Combretum-Commiphora wood-
land, rock outcrop, stony sandy loam
Sericanthe
andongensis (Hiern) Robbr. var. andongensis
(= Tricalysia andongensis Hiern), 1506, N, 1 .2-1.5, Combretum-
Commiphora woodland, dryland, shallow sandy loam
Vangueria
infausta Burch, subsp. infausta, §, +, Mi, 3.0, koppie, rock outcrop, sandy
Plectroniella
armata (K. Schum.) Robyns, 1189, Mi, 3.0-4.0, riverine, seasonal stream,
river bank, stream thicket, clayey loam
Bothalia 24,1 ( 1994)
53
Pyrostria
hystrix (Bremek.) Bridson
(= Dinocanthium hystrix Bremek.), 1191 , Mi, 2.0-3. 0, riverine,
seasonal stream, river & stream bank, sandy loam
Pavetta
catophylla K. Schum., 975, 1047 , N, 0.8-1 .0, koppie, Combretum wood-
land, rock outcrop, partial shade in dryland, stony loam, sandy
clayey loam
gardeniifoliaA. Rich. var. gardeniifolia, 1638, 1677, Mi,2.0-4.0, koppie,
seasonal stream, rock outcrop (dolerite), stream bank, sandy
loam, loam
Richardia
brasiliensis Gomes *, 1215 , T, 0.05, -, disturbed (garden), sandy loam
scabra L. *, 1127, T, 0.05, -, disturbed (roadside), sandy loam
CUCURBITACEAE
Kedrostis
hirtella (Naudin) Cogn., §, L, 2.0. koppie, rock outcrop, gravelly, sandy
Momordica
balsamina L., 1090, L, 3.0, seasonal stream, stream bank, alluvial sand,
sandy loam
boivinii Baill., 1304, L, 0.2, riverine, seasonal stream, river & stream
bank shade, humus-rich alluvial sand
Cucumis
anguria L.
(= var. longipes (Hook, f.) A. Meeuse), §, L, 1.0, Acacia &
Combretum woodland, dryland, gravelly, sandy
hirsutus Sond., §, L. 1 .6, Acacia & Combretum woodland, dryland, sandy
metuliferus Naudin, 1157, L, 3.0, riverine, seasonal stream, river &
stream bank, alluvial sand
zeyheri Sond., 370,
(= C. prophetarum L. subsp. zeyheri (Sond.) C. Jeffrey), 1150, L.
0.05-0.1, -, disturbed (old lands), sandy loam
Lagenaria
siceraria ( Molina ) Standi, 1644, L. 5.0, riverine, seasonal stream, river
& stream bank, alluvial sand
Coccinia
rehmannii Cogn., 327,
(= var. rehmannii ), 1091, 1341. 1399, L. 0. 1-2.0, riverine, sea-
sonal stream, open parkland, Combretum woodland, river &
stream bank, seepline complex, dryland, disturbed (roadside),
gravelly, stony loam, sandy loam, loam
CAMPANULACEAE
Wahlenbergia
undulata (L.f.) A. DC., §, H, 0.3, riverine, river bed, river sand
ASTERACEAE
Ethulia
conyzoides L.f. subsp. conyzoides, 1378, 1419, T, 0.6-0. 7. riverine, river
bed, reed bed. waterlogged river sand
Vemonia
crataegifolia Hutch., §, N, 1.5, riverine, river bank, sandy loam
fastigiata Oliv. & Hiem, 1098, T, 0.4, -. disturbed (roadside), sandy loam
glabra (Steetz) Vatke var. glabra, §, H, 0.6, -, disturbed (roadside), gravel,
stony loam
oligocephala (DC.) Sch.Bip. ex Walp., §, H. 0.3, Acacia woodland,
dryland, sandy loam
steetziana Oliv. & Hiem
(= V. poskeana Vatke & Hildebr. var. chlorolepis (Steetz) O.
Hoffm.), 1109, T. 1.0, Combretum woodland, disturbed (over-
grazed and trampled), sandy loam
Aster
squamatus (Spreng.) Hieron. *, 1172, T, 1 .0, aquatic, dam seepage, sandy
gravel
Nidorella
resedifolia DC. subsp. resedifolia, 384, T, 1.5, riverine, river bank, sandy
loam
Blumea
cafra (DC.) O. Hoffm., 1318, T, 0.5, aquatic, dam seepage, stony, sandy,
clayey loam
gariepina DC., 1218, T, 1.0, -, disturbed (de-bushed, roadside), shallow
gravel
Pluchea
dioscoridis (L.) DC., 1031, N, 0.6, riverine, Combretum woodland, river
bed, alluvial & river sand
Pechuel-Loeschea
leubnitziae (Kuntze) O. Hoffm., §, Ch, 1.2, Acacia, Combretum, &
Colophospermum woodland, riverine, seasonal stream, river &
stream bank, alluvial sand, clayey loam
Denekia
capensis Thunb., §, T, 0. 1-0.2, aquatic, edge of seasonal pan, mud
Epaltes
gariepina (DC.) Steetz, 1156, 1371 , Ch. 0.3-0.4, riverine, open parkland,
river bed, dam shores, seepline complex, disturbed (roadside),
alluvial sand, silt
Sphaeranthus
incisus Robyns, 1192, T, 0.3, aquatic, dam shore, clay
Helichrysum
candolleanum H. Buek, 1002, 1151 . H, 0. 2-0.3, -, disturbed (old lands,
roadside), sandy loam
Calostephane
divaricata Benth., 924, 1616, 1713, H, 0.3-0.6, Combretum & mixed
woodland, dryland, disturbed areas (overgrazed & trampled),
shallow sandy gravel
Pegolettia
senegalensis Cass., 1122, T, 0.4, -, disturbed (roadside), gravel
Geigeria
burkei Harv. subsp. fruticulosa Merxm., §, H, 0.4, riverine, river bed.
sand bank, river sand
omativa O. Hoffm., §, Ch, 0.2-0.3, Acacia woodland, dryland, gravelly,
sandy
Acanthospermum
hispidum DC. *, 1479, T, 0.5-0.6, riverine, river bank (trampled), stony
or sandy loam
Xanthium
strumarium L. *, 1446, T, 0.4, aquatic, dam seepage, sandy gravel
Zinnia
peruviana (L.) L. *, §, T, 0. 2-0.3, -, disturbed (overgrazed, trampled, &
roadside), sandy gravel
Eclipta
prostrata (L.) L. *, 1344, T, 0.4, aquatic, riverine, dam seepage, river &
stream bed sandy, river sand
Aspilia
mossambicensis (Oliv.) Wild. 1153, 1328, Ch, 0.6-1. 0, mixed woodland,
riverine, seasonal stream, shade in dryland & river & stream
banks, shallow stony sandy loam
Melanthera
scandens (Schumach. <£ Thonn.) Roberty subsp. dregei (DC.) Wild, 383,
T, 1.5, riverine, river bank, loam
triternata ( Klatt) Wild
(= M. marlothiana O. Hoffm.), 1346, T, 1.5, riverine, reed bed,
alluvial & river sand
Bidens
pilosa L. *, 284, T, 0.2, -, disturbed (overgrazed & trampled, garden),
sandy loam, loam
Flaveria
bidentis (L.) Kuntze *, §, T, 0. 3-0.4, riverine, river bed, river sand
Schkuhria
pinnata (Lam.) Cabrera *, 1209, T, 0.2, -, disturbed (old lands, roadside,
garden), sandy loam
Tagetes
minuta L. *, §. T, 0.5-0.7, -, disturbed (overgrazed & trampled), sandy
loam
Senecio
pleistocephalus S. Moore, §, L, 4.0, koppie, rock outcrop, sandy gravel
viminalis Bremek., 875, L, 1. 5-3.0, riverine, river bank, loam
Emilia
transvaalensis (Bolus) C. Jeffrey
(= Senecio transvaalensis Bolus), 1391, 1725, T, 0.4, -, disturbed
(roadside), shallow sandy loam
Kleinia
longiflora DC.
(= Senecio longiflorus (DC.) Sch.Bip), §, Ch, 0.5-0.8, open
parkland, seepline complex, clayey loam
Hirpicium
bechuanense (S. Moore) Roessler, 378, 618, H, 0.4, Combretum wood-
land. disturbed (roadside), gravel, sandy loam
Sonchus
oleraceus L. *, 283, T, 0.5, grassland, vlei, disturbed (garden), loam
Bothalia 24, 1 : 55-66 ( 1 994)
External fruit morphology of southern African Arundineae (Arundinoideae:
Poaceae)
N.P. BARKER*
Keywords: achene, Arundineae, Arundinoideae, caryopsis, embryo, external morphology, hilum, Poaceae, surface sculpturing, systematics
ABSTRACT
Fruits of a number of taxa of all indigenous southern African arundinoid genera were examined by means of SEM. Size,
shape, compression, surface sculpturing, embryo and hilum features were recorded and fruits of all genera are illustrated. Results
are compared to existing descriptions. The genera are placed in five informal groups according to similarities noted in the fruits.
U1TTREKSEL
Vrugte van ’n aantal taksons van alle inheemse Suider-Afrikaanse arundinoiede genusse is deur middel van
aftaselektronmikroskopie ondersoek. Grootte, vorm, samedrukking, oppervlakskulptuur, embrio- en hilumkenmerke is
aangeteken en vrugte van alle genusse word geillustreer. Resultate word met bestaande beskrywings vergelyk. Die genusse word
volgens ooreenkomste wat by die vrugte waargeneem is, in vyf informele groepe geplaas.
INTRODUCTION
In his book of grasses of the British Isles, which is
now in its third edition, C.E. Hubbard (1984) included a
section on the ‘seeds' of the grasses, which gave illustra-
tions of the grains of various genera, as well as a key to
the genera based mainly on characteristics of their fruits
(Hubbard 1984, 1st edn 1954). Despite this emphasis, fruit
morphology is still a neglected aspect of grass systematics.
In this study, observations on the fruits of the southern
African Arundineae are presented.
The tribe Arundineae
The tribe Arundineae belongs to the subfamily Arun-
dinoideae which Kellogg & Campbell (1987) consider to
be polyphyletic — an assemblage of basal groups and ev-
olutionary dead ends.
The classification by Clayton & Renvoize (1986),
which is followed in this work, provides a broad definition
for the tribe Arundineae which encompasses most of the
genera in the subfamily. The tribe is a fragmented, hetero-
geneous group of numerous isolated or weakly linked gen-
era. Other workers divide the subfamily into numerous
smaller tribes on the basis of phenetic similarity (Watson
1990) or breeding systems (Conert 1987).
The Arundineae are cosmopolitan. Of the approxi-
mately 40 genera in the tribe, 16 occur in southern Africa.
Two of these, Arundo L. and Phragmites Adans.. are pan-
demic, and species of a third, Cortaderia Stapf, were in-
troduced into South Africa to control soil erosion on mine
tailings dumps (Robinson 1984).
* Botany Department, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, Ronde-
bosch 7700.
MS. received: 1992-08-14.
Terminology
There is as yet no general agreement on the terminol-
ogy to be used for describing the fruits of the Poaceae.
In the Poaceae the ovary is uniloculate. After pollination
and fertilisation (ignoring examples of apomixis) the ovule
develops into a seed, and the ovary wall becomes a fruit
coat or pericarp. In the majority of grasses, the seed and
pericarp are fused, forming a grain (Clifford & Watson
1977). These authors equate this term to the term
‘caryopsis’ but point out that the grain may take the form
of one of a number of different structural types, such as
‘achenes’, ‘nuts’ or ‘berries’. In the fruit of some grasses,
the seed is free from the pericarp. Clayton & Renvoize
(1986) refer to such a fruit as an achene. However,
Sendulsky et al. (1987) consider it a modified caryopsis,
formed by the collapse of either the endocarp or the endo-
and mesocarps at a late stage of development, and rec-
ommend that use of the term ‘achene’ in grass biology be
discontinued.
In the light of the uncertainty in terminology, the grass
grain will be referred to as a fruit in this study. When the
necessary distinction between a grain with a free pericarp
and a grain with an adnate pericarp has to be made, the
term ‘achene’ will be used for the former, and ‘caryopsis’
for the latter grain type.
The fruit of the Arundineae
Clayton & Renvoize (1986) describe the fruit of this
tribe as a caryopsis, sometimes with a free or separable
pericarp, rarely an achene. They name three genera within
the tribe which possess the achene fruit type: Pyrr-
hanthera Zotov, Dregeochloa Conert and Pentameris P.
Beauv. The latter two are endemic to southern Africa and
were included in this study.
SEM studies on the fruits of arundinoid genera by
Barker (1986, 1989, 1990, 1993, and in prep.), have cov-
roups as presented in the discussion
symmetry of shape of fruit in outline; D-V, dorsiventral; Lat., lateral; + embryo and hilum lengths are fractions of total fruit length.
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
57
ered fruits of most species of Pentameris P. Beauv. and
Pseudopentameris Coned. Davidse (1988) examined the
fruits of the genus Prionanthium Desv. These studies are
discussed below. In this paper the external morphology of
the fruits of the southern African arundinoids is explored.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Fruit collection
Mature fruits of several taxa in each genus were col-
lected from herbarium specimens housed in the National
Herbarium in Pretoria (PRE). Taxa representing all en-
demic southern African genera were sampled, as well as
taxa of the pandemic genus Phragmites Adans. Fruits of
Arundo L. were unfortunately not available for study. The
specimens and species from which fruit were obtained are
listed below.
As the fmits were dry, no additional desiccation pro-
cedures were followed. Specimens were mounted on the
SEM stubs by means of two-sided tape. They were then
coated in gold-palladium and examined using an ISI-SX-
25 Scanning Electron Microscope. Photographs were
taken using 60 x 70 mm format black and white Ilford
FP4 100 ASA film.
Specimens examined
Centropodia
glauca (Nees) T.A. Cope: De Winter & Hardy 8053 ; Dinter s.n.
(= PRE 331 15); Merxmtiller & Giess 30681, 32064.
mossamedensis (Rendle) T.A. Cope: Boss s.n. (TM 35977).
Chaetobromus
dregeanus Nees: Merxmtiller & Giess 32059.
involucratus (Schrad. ) Nees: Boucher 2542.
Dregeocliloa pumilla (Nees) Conert: Dinter 6391; Schaeffer 12991.
Elytrophorus
globularis Hack.: Erens 342; Smith 1847.
spicatus (Willd.) A. Camus: Ellis 3718.
Karroochloa
cur\>a (Nees) Conert & Tiirpe: Lichtenberg 7718A.
purpurea (L. f.) Conert & Tiirpe: Flanagan 1669; CL Reid 1253.
schismoides (Stapf ex Conert) Conert & Tiirpe: Hardy 607; Munro
s.n.; CL Reid 1271.
tenella (Nees) Conert & Tiirpe: Esterhuysen 23506.
Merxmuellera
drakensbergensis (Schweick.) Conert: Hoener 2184.
dura (Stapf) Conert: Poggenpoel 8274.
stricta (Schrad.) Conert: Adanson 3604; Boucher 1837; Kinges 3482.
Pentaschistis
airoides (Nees) Stapf subsp. airoides: Davidse 33245.
ampla (Nees) McClean: Taylor 11054.
cirrhulosa (Nees) H.P. Linder: Davidse 33801.
curvifolia (Schrad.) Stapf: Davidse 34061 .
natalensis Stapf: Braun 279.
pusila (Nees) H.P. Linder: Esterhuysen 22763, 24195.
Phragmites
australis (Cav.) Steud.: Burtt Davy 358; Le Roux 558; Ward 4225.
mauritianus Kunth: Jacobsen 2405; Loeb 489; Miller B/1169.
Schismus
barbatus (Loefl. ex L.) Thell.: Giess 3225; Liebenberg 6651: Ver-
doorn 1046.
inermis (Stapf) C.E. Hubb.: Lovemore s.n.; Tyson s.n.
scaberrimus Nees: De Winter & Verdoom 9037; Oliver, Toelken &
Venter 635; Van Rensburg 123.
Styppeiochloa gynoglossa (Gooss.) De Winter: Killick & Vahrmeijer
3609.
Tribolium
amplexum Renvoize: Ihlenfeldt 1661.
brachystachyum (Nees) Renvoize: Esterhuysen 1699.
uniolae (L. f.) Renvoize: Kruger KR902; Liebenberg 7719.
Urochlaena pusilla Nees: Davidse 33398, 34021 .
OBSERVATIONS AND DISCUSSION
The salient features of the fruits examined are listed
in Table 1, and these features are illustrated in Figures
1-5. Although only a few of the species in the larger gen-
era were examined, the illustrations show that the fmits
of different species within a genus are relatively uniform.
The differences at generic level are more distinct, al-
though some genera display strong similarities. These
similarities in fruit morphology may be used to form
groups of genera on a purely phenetic basis, where char-
acter and structural homologies are assumed. Four such
groups were assembled on the basis of shared fruit char-
acters. A fifth group comprises three remaining genera,
the fmits of which resemble no other genera in the tribe.
As the tribe is considered to be polyphyletic, these groups
may represent various monophyletic lineages within the
Arundineae. These informal groups, and the genera that
are placed in each, are discussed below, and the salient
features of these groups and genera are presented in Table
2
TABLE 2. — The groups of genera, their fruit characteristics and the figures illustrating the fruits of each genus
58
Bothalia 24.1 (1094)
FIGURE I . — Fruit of Karroodtloa and Schismus spp. (Group I ). A, D, K. purpurea: A, hilar side of fruit showing broadly obovale shape and remains
of style branches; D, detail of surface features. B, K. schismoides , embryo side. C, K. tenella, lateral view showing degree of compression.
E, Schismus scaberrimus, glabrous, broadly obovate, showing large embryo. F, H, S. inermis: F, alveolate surface features; H, hilar side. G,
S. barbatus, lateral view, showing asymmetrical outline. Scale bars: A, 220 pm; B, 1 80 pm; C, 210 pm; D, 80 pm; E, 85 pm; F, 150 pm; G,
170 pm; H, 230 pm.
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
59
Group 1: Karroochloa , Schismus and Dregeochloa
Genera in this group share fruits which are broadly
obovate, strongly dorsiventrally compressed, generally
glabrous or almost so, have embryos 1/3 to Vi the fruit
length, and punctiform hila.
Karroochloa Conert
Fruit of all four species of this genus were examined
and illustrated in this study (Figure 1A-D). The differ-
ences between the fruit of the species examined is slight,
but a larger sample size may reveal that these differences
intergrade.
Karroochloa was separated from Danthonia DC. on
the basis of, among other characters, differences in the
fruit (Conert & Tiirpe 1969). The latter genus has fruit
which are described as having a hilum half to three quar-
ters the length of the fruit and an embryo no longer than
a third the length of the fruit. Further differences in the
fruit morphology between Karroochloa and Danthonia in-
clude the size of the fruit, surface features, and nature of
the endosperm (Conert & Tiirpe 1969).
Clayton & Renvoize (1986) include Karroochloa ,
along with Merxmuellera Conert and several other non-
African genera, in Rytidosperma Steud. However, the de-
scription of the fruit of Rytidosperma does not match that
observed in Karroochloa in this study. Thus the placement
of Karroochloa in this genus ought to be questioned, es-
pecially in the light of the strong apparent similarities be-
tween Karroochloa and Schismus, which is not included
in the broad Rytidosperma complex.
Schismus P. Beauv.
Schismus comprises five species, four of which occur
in southern Africa. Fruit of three of the five species were
examined (Figure 1E-H). They are all very similar and
closely resemble those of Karroochloa. Results presented
in Table 1 agree essentially with descriptions provided by
Clayton & Renvoize (1986) and Conert & Tiirpe ( 1974).
Dregeochloa Conert
Dregeochloa was created by Conert (1966) to accom-
modate two Danthonia species with an unusual fruit mor-
phology: an obovate caryopsis with a punctiform hilum.
and a membranaceous, removable pericarp. As mentioned
in the introduction, Clayton & Renvoize (1986) consider
the fruit of this genus to be an achene. The fruits of D.
pumila were examined (Figure 2 A, B). The only other
species in the genus, D. calviniensis Conert, is extremely
rare.
The pericarp appears to be flaking and easily remov-
able from the fruit (Figure 2A). It is possible that the fruit
surface was damaged during manipulations, but the fra-
gility of the pericarp and the apparent ease of removal
suggests that it is free from the layers beneath. This and
other features recorded in Table 1 agree with the descrip-
tions by both Conert (1966) and Clayton & Renvoize
(1986). Conert (1966), however, describes the pericarp as
membranaceous whereas Clayton & Renvoize (1986)
refer to it as thick.
Dregeochloa is placed in this group on the basis of the
shape and compression of the fruit and the large embryo.
Conert (1971) observed that the fruit of this taxon is unlike
that of any other arundinoid. The somewhat mgose surface
and the fact that the fruit appears to be an achene, as
noted by Clayton & Renvoize (1986) and corroborated
here, suggests that the relationship of this taxon to the
Schismus-Karroochloa alliance is somewhat tentative.
Group 2: Chaetobromus and Pseudopentameris
The genera in group 2 have narrowly elliptic fruits with
reticulate sculpturing, narrow, canaliculate hila extending
almost the entire length of the fruit and embryos which
are a fifth to a quarter the length of the fruit. These two
genera have not been previously considered as closely re-
lated.
Chaetobromus Nees
Chaetobromus comprises either two (Barker in Gibbs
Russell et al. 1990), three (Clayton & Renvoize 1986) or
four species (Chippindall 1955). Spies et al. (1990) have
suggested that the genus may be a polyploid series, divis-
ible into two phenotypic groups: C. dregeanus and C. in-
volucratus. Fruits of both these groups were examined
and found to be identical (Figure 2C), and corroborate the
descriptions of Clayton & Renvoize (1986).
Pseudopentameris Conert
Barker (1986, 1989. 1990) found the fruits of all spe-
cies to be almost identical, differing only in size. Figure
2D shows the embryo and surface features of the fruit of
this genus. Fruits of this genus are unique in having stig-
mata- like apical appendages, termed pseudostigmata by
Barker (1990, and in prep.). These structures, visible on
the apices of the ovary, developing and mature fruit, are
readily deciduous, being best observed in mature ovaries
and developing fruit. These structures have not been ob-
served in Chaetobromus, but no immature fruits of this
genus have been examined. The descriptions of the fruit
of Pseudopentameris by Clayton & Renvoize ( 1 986) and
Gibbs Russell et al. (1990) agree with details given in
Table 1 . The decision to transfer Pentameris obtusifolia
(Hochst.) Schweick. to Pseudopentameris (Barker in
prep.) was made partly on the basis of strong similarities
of the fruit characters.
Group 3: Tribolium and Uroehlaena
The fruits of genera in this group are ovate, strongly
dorsiventrally compressed, with a flaking pericarp. The
embryo is a quarter to half the length of the fruit.
Tribolium Desv.
This genus comprises either 1 1 (Gibbs Russell et al.
1990) or nine species (Spies et al. 1992). Clayton &
Renvoize (1986) consider this genus to be an outlier in
the Arundineae, with at least superficial similarities to
genera in the Eragrostideae.
The fruits of this genus are described by Clayton &
Renvoize (1986) as having a reluctantly separable peri-
carp. This description agrees with that given by Gibbs
60
Bothalia 24.1 ( 1004)
FIGURE 2. — Fruit of various genera in Groups 1 , 2 & 3. A, B, Dregeochloa pumila (Group 1): A, hilar side showing flaking pericarp; B, details ol
rugose surface. C, Chaetobromus dregeanus (Group 2), hilar side, showing long, canaliculate hilum and scalariform-reticulate surface
features; D. Pseudopentamerisbrachyphylla (Group 2), embryo, showing scalariform-reticulate surface. E-G, Tribolium spp. (Group 3): E,
T. uniolae , hilar view, showing rugose surface and stylar remains; F, T. amplexum, embryo side, broadly elliptic in outline; G, T.
brachystachyum , surface, showing flaking outer layers and rugose surface beneath. H, Urochlaenapusilla (Group 3), showing large embryo
and extensive flaking of outer layers. Scale bars: A, 350 pm; B, 60 pm; C. 560 pm; D, 285 pm; E, 300 pm; F, 425 pm; G, 1 15 pm; H, 490
pm.
Bothalia 24, 1 (1994)
61
Russell et al. (1990), who describe the fruits as being
small, with a short hilum and embryo, and a fairly loosely
adherent pericarp. These descriptions match observations
made in this study, where the fruits of three species in
this genus were studied (Figure 2E-G). As shown in Fig-
ure 2G, the rugose outer layer of the fruit is separable,
matching the decription given by Clayton & Renvoize
(1986). The exposed surface below the pericaip is also
rugose.
Urochlaena Nees
The fruit of the monotypic genus Urochlaena is de-
scribed by Clayton & Renvoize (1986) as a caryopsis with
a free pericarp, an observation repeated by Gibbs Russell
et al. (1990). The embryo is described by these latter au-
thors as being large, while the hilum is short but large.
The fruits of Urochlaena (Figure 2H) are similar to those
of Tribolium.
Tribolium and Urochlaena thus form a natural group
on the basis of all the fruit characters examined. In par-
ticular, the nature of the flaking and separable pericarp
indicate a close relationship between the two genera.
These observations augment the data from other studies
suggesting strong similarities between Urochlaena and
Tribolium (Clayton & Renvoize 1986; Ellis 1988; Spies
et al. 1992).
Group 4: Centropodia, Merxmuellera , Styppeiochloa ,
Prionanthium and Pentaschistis
The fruits of the genera in this group share features
such as a reticulate surface, a hilum approximately half
the length of the fruit, an embryo about a quarter to a
third the length of the fruit and only slight compression
in either plane. However, the genera in this group are
probably, at best, only distantly related, given the differ-
ences in floral and vegetative morphology.
Centropodia Rchb.
Two of the four species in this genus were examined.
Conert (1962) describes the fruits of Centropodia as being
naked caryopses, with linear hila and embryos one third
the length of the fruits. This description approximates the
observations made in the present study (Figure 3A, B),
although Conert’s (1962) description of the hilum as being
linear differs from the present study where it is shown to
be shallowly punctiform (Figure 3B).
In view of the differences in photosynthetic pathways
and thus leaf anatomy (Ellis 1984), the relationship of
Centropodia to the other genera in this group should be
considered as tentative and distant.
Merxmuellera Conert
At present, 20 species are recognised in this genus,
two of which are known only from Madagascar. The fruits
of three southern African species of the genus were stud-
ied. Each of these species came from a different part of
the distribution range of the genus and from a different
habitat. The fruits of all three species studied were re-
markably similar (Figure 3C-E).
The fruits of Merxmuellera have been described as
brown, free, almost terete caryopses, two to three milli-
metres in length (Conert 1970). This description, though
sparse, agrees with observations made in this study. Clay-
ton & Renvoize (1986) include Merxmuellera in Rytido-
sperma, and their description of the fruits of this latter
genus is considered too broad to be applicable to Merx-
muellera alone.
Styppeiochloa De Winter
Styppeiochloa gynoglossa, the only southern African
species in the genus, was investigated. De Winter (1966)
described the fmits of Styppeiochloa as elliptic caryopses
with a linear hilum three quarters the length of the grain
and an embryo one quarter the length of the grain, a de-
scription matching observations made here. Clayton &
Renvoize (1986) do not provide a description of the fruit.
The fmit of S. gynoglossa is illustrated in Figure 3F-H.
Pentaschistis (Nees) Spach
Pentaschistis is the largest genus in the tribe, compris-
ing 72 species (Linder & Ellis 1990). The fruits of only
six species, including those of P. pusilla {- Poagrostis
pusilla (Nees) Stapf) were studied. Despite the size of the
genus, little variation was found in the external morphol-
ogy of the fmits investigated (Figure 4A-H).
The fmits were found to conform with descriptions
given by Clayton & Renvoize (1986) and Gibbs Russell
et al. (1990). However, the pericarp description given by
the latter workers (free to loosely adherent to fused) was
found to be too broad; the pericaip appeared to be fused
in all the species studied.
Prionanthium Desv.
Prionanthium comprises three species. It was revised
by Davidse (1988) who described and illustrated the fruit
of two species. The genus shares many fmit characters
with Pentaschistis, an observation supporting the hypoth-
esis that these two genera are closely related, as proposed
by Linder et al. (1990) on the basis of the presence of
unusual glands in both these genera. In addition. Davidse
(1988) considers the base chromosome number of x = 7,
which is common to both genera, to also be an indication
of their close relationship. This is in contrast to Clayton
& Renvoize (1986), who place Prionanthium close to
Tribolium and Urochlaena.
Group 5: special cases
Three genera are placed in this group, not because of
any similarities in the nature of the fmit, but simply be-
cause their fruits resemble none of the fruits of the other
genera discussed above. These 'misfits’ are Phragmites,
Pentameris and Elytrophorus.
Phragmites Adans.
Phragmites is a pandemic genus with two species oc-
curring in southern Africa, P. australis and P. mauritianus.
The fmits of these species examined were almost identi-
cal. As no detailed description of the fmit from past work-
ers was found, the observations presented here cannot be
62
Bothalia 24.1 (1994)
FIGURE 3. — Fruit of genera in Group 4 (Centropodia, Merxmuellera and Styppeiochloa spp). A, B, C. glcutca: embryo side, showing large embryo,
reticulate surface features and remains of style; B. hilar side, showing punctiform hilum. C. M. dura , hilar region, close-up of scalariform-
reticulate surface features. D, E, M. stricter. D, embryo side, showing embryo a third the length of fruit; E, broad, fairly short hilum and
remains of styles. F-H, S. gynoglossa: F, reticulate surface features; G, embryo one third length of fruit; H, lateral view. Scale bars: A. 370
pm; B, 425 pm; C, D, 1 1 0 pm; E, 695 pm; F, 65 pm; G, H, 465 pm.
Bolhalia 24.1 (1994)
62
FIGURE 4. — Fruit of Pentaschistis spp. (Group 4). A, P. pusilla, showing embryo and regularly reticulate surface features. B. P. ampla, lateral
view, with regularly reticulate surface features. C, D, H, P. natalensis: C, embryo side of elliptic fruit; D, embryo region showing reticulate
surface features; FI, hilar side. E, P. cirrhulosa , showing long, canaliculate hilum. F, G, P. airoides subsp. airoides : F, embryo showing
rugose-reticulate surface features; G, deep, broad long hilum. Scale bars: A, 350 pm; B. 415 pm; C, 455 pm; D, 180 pm; E, 325 pm; F, 85
pm; G, 230 pm; H, 445 pm.
64
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
compared to past descriptions. The fruits of this genus are
illustrated in Figure 5A-C.
The fruits of Phragmites are unusual within the con-
text of the southern African Arundineae. Their small size
undoubtedly assists in their dispersal by wind, the fruit
being dispersed in situ in the lloret. Further examination
of the fruits of other reed-like grasses such as Arundo ,
Hakonechloa Honda and Molinia Schrank may assist in
clarifying the relationships between Phragmites and other
related reed genera with wind dispersed fruit.
Pentameris P. Beauv.
The fruits of all except one of the nine species of Pen-
tameris have been investigated and illustrated (Barker
1986, 1989, 1990, 1993). The fruit of P oreophila N.P.
Barker is illustrated in Figure 5D.
FIGURE 5. — Fruit of genera in Group 5 (Phragmites, Pentameris and Elytropharus). A, Phragmites australis, showing large embryo, regularly
reticulate surface and remains of styles. B, C, Phragmites mauritianus: B, surface features; C, hilar side showing rugose surface features. D,
Pentameris oreopltila showing colliculate surface. E-G, Elytropharus globularis: E, surface detail; F. lateral view showing unusual shape
and raised, reticulate surface; G, embryo view. Scale bars; A, 380 mm; B, 250 mm; C, 80 mm; D, 490 mm; E, 280 mm; F, 140 mm; G, 155
mm.
Bothalia 24,1 ( 1994)
65
Pentameris possesses fruits which differ markedly
from other southern African arundinoid genera, in both
external and internal structure. The fruits of this genus are
achenes with apical appendages in the form of hairs or
hair-like structures.
These two characters clearly distinguish this genus
from the closely related and probable sister genus Pen-
taschistis. Thus in a phylogenetic system based on overall
morphology, Pentameris would belong in group 4. How-
ever, on the basis of phenetic groupings employed here,
it is treated as an exceptional taxon.
Elytrophorus P. Beauv.
Elytrophorus differs from the other genera of the
Arundineae in having dimorphic spikelets and a membra-
nous ligule (as opposed to the more usual arundinoid lig-
ule comprising a row of hairs).
Both species in this genus were examined, and the
fruits of these two taxa were identical in all but size, those
of E. globularis being far larger than those of E. spicatus
(Figure 5E-G). Schweickerdt (1942) reported that the em-
bryo is almost as long as the grain, whereas Clayton &
Renvoize (1986) consider the embryo to be only half the
length of the fruit, a size more in keeping with that ob-
served here. Schweickerdt ( l.c .) alludes to the caryopsis
as ‘showing the remains of the pericarp’, implying that
the pericarp is separable. However, Clayton & Renvoize
(1986) do not consider the fruit of this genus to be an
achene. Instead, the pericarp is described, somewhat con-
fusingly, as being free.
The shape of the fruit of these species is like that of
no other southern African arundinoid. and it is not possible
to place it in any of the other groups described above,
which only serves to enhance the confusion of this taxon's
uncertain affinities: Clayton & Renvoize (1986) consider
Elytrophorus to have uncertain affinities, and Chippindall
(1955) placed it in the Eragrosteae.
CONCLUSION
This study has revealed that the diversity in the floral
and vegetative morphologies of the genera of southern
African Arundineae is parallelled by an equally diverse
set of fruit morphologies. However, this diversity is gen-
erally minimal at infrageneric levels. Despite the diversity
in fruit morphology, certain genera are united in almost
all fruit characters examined (: Tribolium and Urochlaena ;
Karroochloa and Schismus). Where this occurs, it is in-
terpreted as indicating a strong degree of relatedness. Un-
fortunately, only this very limited phylogenetic inter-
pretation is possible using this data. This is because struc-
tural homologies are unproven, only southern African taxa
are being examined, and insufficient characters are ob-
tained from a purely SEM-based study. The extension of
this study to include non-southern African taxa may, how-
ever, provide additional data for comparison.
This study is strictly descriptive. In many instances,
the generic relationships proposed on the basis of fruit
morphology are speculative. Nonetheless, this study has
provided valuable data for incorporation in a phyloge-
netic analysis which is presently being undertaken in the
form of a combined molecular (a survey of chloroplast
DNA sequence variation) and morphological survey of the
entire tribe. This study has indicated the need for a thor-
ough examination of the nature of the fruit of grasses at
the generic level.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank Mrs A. Romanowski (NBI), Mrs
W. Hitchcock (UCT) and Mr R. Carelse (UCT) for assis-
tance with the photographic work, Mrs S. Perold (NBI)
for assistance with the SEM. The Curator of the National
Herbarium (PRE) is thanked for allowing access to, and
SEM exmination of, the specimens cited above. Drs R.P.
Ellis, O.A. Leistner and H.P. Linder are thanked for their
comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript. This work
was carried out while the author was employed by the
National Botanical Institute.
REFERENCES
BARKER. N.R 1986. The shape and ultrastructure of the caryopsis of
Pentameris and Pseudopentameris species (Arundinoideae,
Poaceae). Bothalia 16: 65-69.
BARKER. N.R 1989. The caryopsis surface of Pentameris and Pseudo-
pentameris (Arundinoideae,' Poaceae) revisited. Bothalia 19:
134-136.
BARKER, N.P. 1990. The taxonomy of Pentameris P. Beauv. and
Pseudopentameris Conert. M.Sc. thesis. University of the
Witwatersrand.
BARKER. N.P. 1993. A biosystematic study of Pentameris (Arundineae,
Poaceae). Bothalia 23: 25—47.
BARKER, N.P. in prep. A systematic study of Pseudopentameris
(Arundineae; Poaceae).
CHIPPINDALL, L.K.A. 1955. A guide to the identification of grasses in
southern Africa. In D. Meredith, The grasses and pastures of
South Africa. Central News Agency, Cape Town.
CLAYTON, W.D. & RENVOIZE, S.A. 1986. Genera graminum.
Grasses of the world. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.
CLIFFORD, H.T. & WATSON. L. 1977. Identifying grasses: data, meth-
ods and illustrations. University of Queensland Press, St. Lucia.
CONERT, H.J. 1962. Uber die Gramineen-Gattung Asthenatherum
Nevski. Senckenbergiana Biologica 43: 239-266.
CONERT. H.J. 1966. Dregeochloa, eine neue Gattung der Gramineen
(Gramineae. Arundinoideae, Danthonieae). Senckenbergiana
Biologica 47: 335-343.
CONERT. H.J. 1970. Merxmuellera : eine neue Gattung der Gramineen
(Poaceae: Arundinoideae). Senckenbergiana Biologica 51: 129—
133.
CONERT, H.J. 1971. The genus Danthonia in Africa. Mitteilungen der
Botanischen Staatssanunlung, Munchen 10: 299-308.
CONERT. H.J. 1987. Current concepts in the systematics of the
Arundinoideae. In T.R. Soderstrom, K.W. Hilu, C.S. Campbell &
M.E. Barkworth, Grass systematics and evolution. Smithsonian
Institution Press, Washington D.C.
CONERT, H.J. & TURPE, A.M. 1969. Karroochloa , eine neue Gattung
der Gramineen (Poaceae, Arundinoideae, Danthonieae).
Senckenbergiana Biologica 50: 289-318.
CONERT. H.J. & TURPE, A.M. 1974. Revision der Gattung Schismus
(Poaceae: Arundinoideae: Danthonieae). Abhandlungen der
Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 532: 1-81.
DAV1DSE, G. 1988. A revision of the genus Prionanthium (Poaceae:
Arundinoideae). Bothalia 18: 143-153.
DE WINTER. B.D. 1966. Styppeiochloa De Winter, gen. nov.
(Gramineae). Bothalia 9: 134—137.
ELLIS, R.P. 1984. Leaf anatomy of the South African Danthonieae
(Poaceae). IX. Asthenatherum glaucum. Bothalia 15: 153-159.
ELLIS, R.P. 1988. Leaf anatomy of the South African Danthonieae
(Poaceae). XVI. The genus Urochlaena. Bothalia 18: 101-104.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E.. WATSON, L„ KOEKEMOER. M„ SMOOK.
L„ BARKER. N.P, ANDERSON, H.A. & DALLWITZ, M.J
1990. Grasses of southern Africa. Memoirs of the Botanical Sur-
vey of South Africa No. 58.
HUBBARD, C.E. 1984. Grasses. A guide to their structure, identifica-
tion, uses and distribution in the British Isles. Penguin Books,
Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England.
KELLOGG, E.A. & CAMPBELL, C.S. 1987. Phylogenetic analyses of
the Gramineae. In T.R. Soderstrom, K.W. Hilu, C.S. Campbell &
M.E. Barkworth, Grass systematics amt evolution. Smithsonian
Institution Press, Washington D.C.
LINDER, H P. & ELLIS, R.P. 1990. A revision of the genus Pentaschistis
(Arundineae: Poaceae). Contributions from the Bolus Herbarium
12.
66
Bothalia 24,1 ( 1994)
LINDER, H R, THOMPSON, J.F., ELLIS, R.P & PEROLD, S.M. 1990.
The occurrence, anatomy, and systematic implications of the
glands in Pentaschistis and Prionanthium (Poaceae, Arundinoi-
deae, Arundineae). Botanical Gazette 151: 221-233.
ROBINSON, E.R. 1984. Naturalized species of Cortaderia (Poaceae) in
southern Africa. South African Journal of Botany 3: 343-346.
SCHWEICKERDT, H.G. 1942. A taxonomic and anatomical study of
ElvtrophorusP. Beauv. Annals of the Natal Museum 10: 191-214.
SENDULSKY, T„ FILGUEIRAS, T.S. & BURMAN, A.G. 1987. Fruits,
embryos and seedlings. In T.R. Soderstrom, K.W. Hilu, C.S.
Campbell & M.E. Barkworth, Grass systenmtics and evolution.
Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C.
SPIES, J.J., DU PLESSIS, H„ BARKER, N.P & VAN WYK, S.M.C.
1990. Cytogenetic studies in the genus Cltaeiobrotnus (Poaceae:
Arundineae). Genome 33: 646-658.
SPIES, J.J., DAV1DSE, G. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1992. Cytogenetic studies
in the genus Tribolium (Poaceae: Arundineae). American Journal
of Botany 79: 689-700.
WATSON, L. 1990. The grass family, Poaceae. In G.P Chapman, Repro-
ductive versatility of the grasses. Cambridge University Press.
Bothalia 24,1:67-76 (1994)
Names of the southern African species of Rhus (Anacardiaceae) and their
etymology
R.O. MOFFETT*
Keywords: Anacardiaceae, etymology, Rhus, southern Africa
ABSTRACT
Brief notes on the origin of the scientific names of all the Rhus species recognized in the recent revision of the genus (Moffett
1993) are given, as well as a complete list of common names for each species. Recommendations are also made on those species
which should be added to or removed from the National list of indigenous trees.
UITTREKSEL
Kort aantekeninge oor die oorsprong van die wetenskaplike name van al die Rhus- spesies wat in die onlangse hersiening van
die genus (Moffett 1993) erken is, asook 'n volledige lys van volksname vir elke spesie word voorsien. Daar word ook
aanbevelings gemaak oor watter spesies by die Nasionale lys van inheemse borne gevoeg of daaruit verwyder moet word
INTRODUCTION
Rhus is one of the most widespread of all genera in
the southern Africa flora and there are few areas without
at least one species (Figure 1). Species such as R. lancea
(karree), R. leptodictya (mountain karree), R. pendulina
(white karree), R. erosa (broom karree) and R. pyroides
(common wild currant) are fairly well known and their
importance as providers of shelter, food, fencing posts,
fuel and ornamentals was highlighted in 1983 when the
Department of Environment Affairs declared the karree
'Tree of the Year’ (Esterhuyse 1983).
In my recent revision of the southern African taxa of
Rhus for the Flora of southern Africa, I recognized 72
species, 18 infraspecific taxa and a further eight provi-
sional species whose position I have yet to finalize
(Moffett 1993).
Whereas this paper deals mainly with the etymology
of the specific epithets and common names of the 90 rec-
ognized taxa, I have also included the following in the
treatment of each species: the correct name of each spe-
cies, its author and date of publication and its number in
the Flora of southern Africa ( Moffett op. cit. ), the most
important synonym(s) (if any) of each species in paren-
theses and brief descriptions of the habit and distribution
of each species.
Common names preceded by a number, as follows:
386, karree, karee, are taken from the National list of in-
digenous trees (Von Breitenbach 1990). Species of which
the suggested common names are followed by an * should
be added to the national list, whereas those marked with
+ should be removed from the list as they are not arbo-
rescent.
* Department of Botany, University of the North, Drakensberg Campus,
Private Bag XI 3, Phuthaditjhaba 9866.
MS. received: 1991-09-02.
1 am against the indiscriminate invention of common
names but having recently revised the genus, felt it nec-
essary to not only create order in the scientific nomencla-
ture but also to provide a uniform vernacular nomen-
clature. In this regard I have followed Von Breitenbach
{op. cit.) who standardized the common names of the ar-
borescent species by, in most cases, highlighting a single
English and single Afrikaans name for each species, e.g.
red currant/bostaaibos for R. chirindensis, a species given
fourteen common names in Palmer & Pitman (1973). In
order not to create further confusion I have maintained
Von Breitenbach’s {op. cit.) choice of common names de-
spite some of them being inappropriate. Where I have pro-
posed a new name it was either based on an unpublished
name already in use in the field as reflected on herbarium
sheets, or on an intimate knowledge of the species con-
cerned. Many of the new names are for lesser-known non-
arborescent species and hopefully may lead to these
species becoming better known. As far as I could ascertain
I have not proposed a new common name for an existing
published one.
Information about botanists and collectors honoured in
specific epithets was taken from Gunn & Codd (1981).
General note on common names
The most popular common names used for the southern
African Rhus species are currant, "korentebos’; karree,
'karee' and 'taaibos'.
The name currant refers to the currant-like small fruits
of the genus; among the currants one finds blue currant
(R. zeyheri), dune currant (R. laevigata) and real wild cur-
rant (R. tomentosa) to name but three. The Korenterivier
near Riversdale in the southern Cape was probably named
after the latter two species, both of which occur on its
banks.
68
Bothalia 24.1 (1994)
FIGURE 1. — Distribution of Rhus species in southern Africa.
Many karree species, with karree (R. lancea) perhaps
the best known, are the source of many place and farm
names. Among the collecting localities listed by Leistner
& Morris (1976), for example, are kareeberge, kareeboom,
kareebos, kareebult, kareefontein, kareekloof, kareekolk,
kareekop, kareekuil, kareelaagte, kareepan, kareeput,
kareerivier and kareevlakte. Other familiar karrees in-
clude bitter karree (R. marlotliii ), broom karree {R. erosa),
mountain karree (R. leptodictya ) and sour karree (R.
ciliata).
There are different views concerning the origin of the
name karee and most authors have suggested that the
name has the same source as the word karoo which means
arid, dry or hard. Nienaber (1963) stated that Karoo was
a compromise between the earlier English Karroo and the
Afrikaans Karo. He reported that its earliest use was by
Schrijver who, in 1689, referred to the Xhaeruh or
Droogerivier, (VRV 12: 1215), whereas Thunberg in 1772,
wrote ‘of the carro’.
According to Nienaber (op. cit.) some of the earliest
references to the tree included the following:
1774: kari-boom, Masson (specimen in BM).
1774: Karre-hout, Thunberg (2:191).
1778: de care-boom. Van Plettenberg (RZA, II: 67).
1791: kare. Van Reenen (RZA, II: 145).
1803: carru hout, Janssens (RZA, IV: 159); car-
ruboom en bosch. Janssens (RZA IV: 176)
1803: caree bosch. Van Reenen (VRV, 18: 242);
currubosch. Van Reenen (VRV, 18: 243).
1803-1806 Karreeboom; Karee bosch; Karee-
bosch, Lichtenstein (VRV, XI: 27).
With the simultaneous use by some of the authors of
the names carro and carre or karoo and karee for the arid
plain and its distinctive tree, it is understandable that a
link should be sought between the two. Pettman (1931)
differed, however, and stated that Karree or Kiri was de-
rived from the Hottentot ‘karib,’ meaning honey beer.
The source of the name karee which I favour is that
given in A bushman dictionary of Dorothea Bleek (1956):
kare n. = haakdoom tree; karee n. = toes, claws, heels,
hoofs, spoor made by feet; karri n. = trunk of tree. Al-
though Bleek does not link karee with the tree, it is easy
to see the connection between a karree leaf and the spoor
of a fairly large bird. A further point of interest concerning
the vernacular is that in Australia, the word karri is used
for Eucalyptus diversicolor , a tree with dark red wood
like our karree (Onions 1956). Could there be a philolog-
ical link between the bushman and the aborigine?
Although I personally support those authors who spell
karree in English with only one r, e.g. Smith (1966) and
Coates Palgrave (1977), Von Breitenbach (op. cit.) main-
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
69
tains the traditional karree and as I have already men-
tioned, in order not to create further confusion, I have
followed the national list.
The name ‘taaibos’ is applied to several species and
Smith (op. cit.) stated that this was due to the tough 'taai'
but resilient branches. Another explanation given to me
in 1981 by a Wolseley farmer was that because of their
woody underground stems, the shrubs were difficult to
remove and therefore ‘taai’. He was referring to R. an-
gustifolia and R. undid ata. two species which prove par-
ticularly difficult to get rid of when clearing natural bush
for cultivation. Although this farmer called these two spe-
cies ‘taaibosse’, they are known by other common names
in the standardized national list which emphasizes the gen-
eral unreliability of common names. Other species known
as ‘taaibosse" include ‘blou taaibos’ (R. zeyheri), ‘bos-
taaibos’ (R. chirindensis) and ‘gewone taaibos’ (R. py-
roides).
Another common name of interest is that of the crow-
berries. Three species have this name, viz. common crow-
berry (R. pentheri), dune crow-berry (R. crenata ) and
broom crow-berry (R. refmcta). Smith (op. cit.) suggested
that the name referred to the fact that the fruit was so
inferior that it was only fit for crows. Besides karee, two
other Khoi (Hottentot) names that have become associated
with the southern African Rhus species are ‘kuni’ as in
kuni-bush for R. undulata and ‘nana’ as in nana-berry for
R. dentata. Smith (op. cit.) stated that the latter name,
which is incorrectly given in his text as ‘namabessie’ but
correctly in the systematic index, was first recorded in
about 1869.
The various common names rarely reflect taxonomic
relationships between the species. Species such as karree
(R. lancea), mountain karree (R. leptodictya) and white
karree (R. pendulina) look superficially alike but upon
close examination are morphologically very different from
one another. The situation regarding the currants is similar
and the red currant (R. chirindensis), is for example, mark-
edly different from the blue currant (R. zeyheri).
Where I have proposed new common names, I have
standardized on currant (English) and ‘taaibos’ (Afri-
kaans), except where a more suitable name has suggested
itself, e.g. Burchell’s kuni-bush for R. burchellii, a species
hitherto included in kuni-bush (R. undulata).
Classification and etymology
Family: Anacardiaceae Lindl. (1830). After the type
genus Anacardium L., a name referring to the heart-like
shape of the swollen, fleshy pedicel of the fruit (cashew
nut).
Tribe: Rhoeae Marchand (1869). After the type genus
Rhus L.
Genus: Rhus L. (1753). After Rhus or povs , an ancient
Greek name which has no Latin equivalent and whose
precise meaning is obscure. Some authors have, however,
suggested a derivation from the Greek word meaning ‘to
flow’ or ‘flowing’ or a derivation from the Celtic rhudd
or rub meaning red. Others have suggested that the name
may have been derived from the Greek for reddish or
rose-pink.
Miller ( 1768), suggested that the ‘flow’ referred to the
use of parts of R. coriaria to check haemorrhages, whereas
Sonder (1860) suggested that the ‘flow’ referred to the
resinous secretions of the plants.
The derivation from the Celtic for red, in allusion to
the colour of the fruit and the autumn leaves as suggested
by G. Don (1832) is, 1 think, dubious. In this regard, Mc-
Nair (1925) pointed out that the Celts were probably too
far north to have influenced the name of this plant which
occurred in the Mediterranean region and in Asia Minor.
It is certain that the type species, R. coriaria L.. was
well known before the time of Christ. Theophrastus in
300 B.C. wrote extensively about this species which he
called sumach, an old Arabian name. Dioscorides was
probably the first to record the name Rhus when in A.D.
± 50 he wrote of Rhus coriaria ‘which is soe called, be-
cause tanners doe use it for ye thickning of their hydes’
(Barkley & Barkley 1938), quoting from John Goodyer’s,
‘1655 Englished edition’.
With regard to the pronunciation of the name Rhus,
the Oxford English Dictionary favours Rhus as in bus (On-
ions 1956). Von Breitenbach (1983), however, pointed out
that the genitive of rhous is rhoos, that the stem is rho
and that Rhus should therefore be pronounced as in bonus.
Subgenus: Thezera (DC.) K. Koch (1853). After The-
zera which first appeared as a specific epithet in R. thezera
Pers., a species subsequently included in R. pentaphylla
(Jacq.) Desf. Persoon cited its habitat as ‘Sicily and
Barbaria’, the latter being North Africa west of Egypt, but
gave no origin for the name Thezera (Persoon 1805). I
suspect it had a geographic connotation.
De Candolle (1825) used Thezera as the name for one
of his sections of the genus Rhus and the name was sub-
sequently given subgeneric status by Koch (Koch 1853).
Rhus acocksii Moffett ( 1 988), FSA 3.
After J.P.H. Acocks ( 1911-1979), South African bota-
nist and ecologist, who collected the type specimen in
Transkei in 1947.
Proposed common names: rock red currant, klipbos-
taaibos.
A scandent shrub/climber occurring on quartzite krantzes
in southern Natal and Transkei.
R. albomarginata Sond. (1860), FSA 46.
Latin for white margin, referring to the creamy white
thickened margin of the leaflets.
Proposed common names: white-edged currant, witrand-
taaibos.
Rare dwarf shrub up to 0.5 m high, from the area between
Grahamstown and Suurberg, north of Port Elizabeth.
70
Bothalia24,l (1994)
R. angustifolia L. (1753), FSA 57.
Latin for narrow leaves, referring to the lance-shaped
leaflets.
Common names : 377 . 1 , willow currant, wilgerkorentebos.
Shrub 1-3 m high, usually found on streambanks in the
southwestern Cape.
R. batophylla Codd (1956), FSA 63.
Greek for bramble leaves, referring to the bramble-like
leaflets.
Proposed common names : bramble currant, braamtaaibos.
Shrub up to 2 m high, only found in the Steelpoort area of
the eastern Transvaal.
R. baurii Schonland ( 1930). See R. pyroides var .pyroides.
R. bolusii Sond. ex Engl. (1883), FSA 32.
After H. Bolus (1834-1911), businessman, botanist
and botanical philanthropist who collected the type spec-
imen near Graaff-Reinet in 1868.
Proposed common names : Bolus’s broom karee, baster-
besemkaree.
Shrub up to 2 m high, found scattered in the eastern OFS,
Lesotho and northeastern Cape.
R. burchellii Sond. ex Engl. (1883), FSA 43.
(= R. undulata sensu Schonland)
After W.J. Burchell (1781-1863), collector par excel-
lence, who between 1811 and 1815 gathered about 50 000
plant specimens in the Cape, 1 10 of which were numbered
Rhus taxa.
Proposed common names : Burchell’s kuni-bush, Burchell
se-koeniebos.*
Shrub up to 5 m high, common on rocky hills of the central
karroid parts of southern Africa.
R. carnosula Schonland (1930), FSA 8.
Latin for slightly fleshy, referring to the somewhat
fleshy leaflets.
Common names'. 379, false nana berry, bastemanabessie.-i-
Suffrutescent shrub up to 1 .5 m high, found mainly along
the coast and adjacent interior between Oribi Gorge, Natal
and East London.
R. chirindensis Baker f . (1911), FSA 2.
(= R. legatii Schonland & R. chirindensis forma
legatii (Schonland) R. Fern. & A. Fern.)
After Chirinda, Zimbabwe, near where the type speci-
men was collected in 1906.
Common names : 380, red currant, bostaaibos.
Shrub or tree up to 23 m high, widely distributed in moister
parts from Swellendam, northeastwards to the Sout-
pansberg and Zimbabwe.
* should be added to the national list.
+ should be removed from the national list.
R. ciliata Licht. ex Schult. (1820), FSA 21.
Latin for cilia, referring to the minute hairs along the
leaflet margins.
Proposed common names: sourkaree, suurkaree.
Shrub up to 2 m high, widespread in the central drier parts
of South Africa and also in central to northern Namibia.
R. crenata Thunb. (1803), FSA 36.
Latin for having rounded teeth, referring to the crenate
apical margin of the leaflets.
Common names: 380.1, dune crow-berry, duinekraai-
bessie.
Shrub up to 4 m high, found on the coastal and adjacent
inland dunes from the Cape Peninsula to mZumbe in
southern Natal.
R. cuneifolia L. f. (1781), FSA 50.
Latin for cuneate leaves, referring to the wedge-shaped
leaflets.
Proposed common names: Kogelberg currant, Kogelberg-
taaibos.
Dwarf xerophytic shrublet up to 0.5 m high, from the
southwestern Cape.
R. dentata Thunb. (1794), FSA 7.
Latin for sharply toothed, referring to the dentate mar-
gins of the leaflets.
Common names: 381, nana berry, nanabessie.
Shrub usually up to 2 m high, rarely reaching 5 m, wide-
spread over the eastern parts of southern Africa from
Storms River, Cape to Potgietersrus.
R. discolor E. Mey. ex Sond. ( 1 860), FSA 52.
Latin for not of the same colour, referring to the leaflets
which are grey-green above, whitish cream below.
Proposed common names: grassveld currant, grasveld-
taaibos.
Dwarf suffrutescent shrub up to 1 m high, widespread in
moister grassland from Hogsback, Cape to Pietersburg.
R. dissecta Thunb. ( 1 803), FSA 60.
Latin for deeply divided, referring to the sharply
toothed and irregularly divided margin of the leaflets.
Proposed common names: long-stalked currant, langsteel-
korentebossie.
Dwarf shrub up to 1.5 m high, found in the southwestern
Cape between Cape Town and Van Rhynsdorp.
R. divaricata Eckl. & Zeyh. ( 1 836), FSA 20.
Latin for spreading, referring to the wide-angled
branching.
Proposed common names: rusty-leaved currant, roesblaar-
taaibos.*
Shrub up to 3 m high, found along mountain ranges from
Graaff-Reinet to Heidelberg, Transvaal.
Bothalia 24, 1 (1994)
71
R. dracomontana Moffett (1993), FSA 14.
Latin for dragon mountains, referring to the Drakens-
berg mountain range.
Proposed common names: Drakensberg dwarf currant,
Drakensbergdwergtaaibos.
Dwarf suffrutescent shrub up to 1.2 m high, found along
the low Drakensberg escarpment between Van Reenen,
Natal and just north of Wakkerstroom, Transvaal.
R. dregeana Sond. ( 1 860), FSA 29.
After J.F. Drege (1794—1881), professional collector,
who between 1826 and 1834 collected about 200 000
specimens in South Africa.
Proposed common names : needle-leaved broom karee,
naaldblaarbesemkaree.
Shrub up to 2 m high, found in the northeastern Cape,
southern OFS and Lesotho.
R. dura Schonland (1930). See R. tumulicola.
R. engleri Britten (1900), FSA 23.
AfterH.G.A. Engler( 1844-1930), Professor of Botany
and Director of the Botanic Garden at Berlin-Dahlem who
was the leading authority on the Anacardiaceae and pro-
duced bench-mark works on them.
Common names : 382, velvet karree, fluweelkaree.
Shrub up to 3 m high, found in the central Transvaal.
R. erosa Thunb. ( 1 8 1 8), FSA 3 1 .
Latin for irregularly toothed, referring to the jagged-
edged margin of the leaflets.
Common names: 383, broom karree, besemkaree.
Shrub up to 3 m high, plentiful on koppies in the northeast-
ern Cape, southern and eastern OFS and Lesotho.
R. fastigata Eckl. & Zeyh. (1836), FSA 19.
Latin for high, exalted. The name, however, is probably
derived from fastigiatus meaning ‘branches clustered, par-
allel and erect, giving a narrow elongated habit'. This
species has, in fact, since 1860 been incorrectly known as
R. fastigiata.
Common names: 383.1, broom currant, besemtaaibos.+
Shrub up to 2 m high, found along the coast and adjacent
interior from near Flumansdorp to near Port Shepstone.
R. gerrardii (Harv. ex Engl.) Diels (1898), FSA 17.
(= R. montana sensu Schonland)
After W.T. Gerrard (d. ± 1866), a noted collector who
with M.J. McKen was responsible for finding many new
species in Natal. This species is listed as Drakensberg
karree under the name R. montana var. gerrardii in the
National list of indigenous trees.
* should be added to the national list.
+ should be removed from the national list.
That common name should, however, be maintained for
R. montana and 1 propose that R. gerrardii be named river
currant, riviertaaibos.*
Shrub up to 2.5 m high, found along banks of perennial
streams from the northern Transkei to the eastern Trans-
vaal highveld.
R. glauca Thunb. ( 1 803), FSA 4 1 .
Latin for glaucous, referring to the colour of the leaflets
which are often bluish green due to a waxy surface.
Common names: 383.2, blue kuni-bush, bloukoeniebos.
Shrub up to 4 m high, found along the coast and the
adjacent interior from Velddrif in the southwestern Cape
to near Kentani in Transkei.
R. gracillima Engl. ( 1 883), FSA 69.
Latin for thin, slender, referring to the slender stems and
pendulous leaves with long narrow leaflets.
Proposed common names: needle-leaved dwarf currant,
naaldvormigedwergtaaibos.
Two varieties are recognized:
var. gracillima and var. glaberrima Schonland after the
smooth, hairless leaflets.
Dwarf rhizomatous shrublet up to 0.7 m high, found in the
central and eastern Transvaal.
R. grandidens Harv. ex Engl. (1883), FSA 5.
Latin for large teeth, referring to the pronounced
toothed margins of many of the leaflets.
Proposed common names: sharp-toothed currant, skerp-
tandtaaibos.
Shrub up to 2 m high, found in a number of disjunct
localities from the eastern Transkei to the northeastern
Transvaal.
R. gueinzii Sond. (1860), FSA 38.
(= R. crispa (Harv. ex Engl.) Schonland, R. simii
Schonland & R. spinescens Diels)
After W. Gueinzius (1814—1874), apothecary and col-
lector who lived in Durban.
Common names: 384, thorny karree, doringkaree.
Shrub up to 3 m high, or sometimes a small tree reaching
8 m, ranging from the eastern Cape to the northern Trans-
vaal.
R. harveyi Moffett (1993), FSA 53.
After W.H. Harvey (1811-1866), one-time Colonial
Treasurer at the Cape and later Professor of Botany at
Trinity College, Dublin.
Proposed common names: Harvey’s currant. Harvey-se-
taaibos.
Dwarf suffrutescent shrub up to 1 m high,* confined to
grassland near Louwsburg, northern Natal and Mbabane,
Swaziland.
72
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
R. horrida Eckl. & Zeyh. ( 1 836), FSA 7 1 .
Latin for sticking out, prickly, rough, bristly, referring
to the spinous nature of the branches.
Proposed common names: red thorn currant, rooidoring-
taaibos.
Shrub up to 1.7 m high, occurring in the Kamiesberg of
Namaqualand.
R. incisa L. f. (1781), FSA 59.
Latin for cut deeply and sharply, referring to the mar-
gins of the leaflets of var. incisa.
Common names: 385, rub-rub berry, baardbessie.
Two varieties are distinguished:
var. incisa and var. effusa (Presl) R. Fern. (= R. obovata
Sond.), after the effusive or loosely spreading inflores-
cence.
Shrub up to 3 m high, ranging from the Richtersveld,
northwestern Cape southwards to Worcester and
eastwards to East London.
R. keetii Schonland ( 1930), FSA 68.
After J.D.M. Keet (1882-1976), one-time Director of
Forestry in the Union Government.
Proposed common names: Keet’s slender currant, Keet-se-
taaibos.
Shrub up to 1.7 m high, occurring in the Waterberg,
northwestern Transvaal and in the Lydenburg Dist.,
eastern Transvaal.
R. kirkii Oliv. (1868), FSA 54.
After Sir John Kirk, pioneer naturalist and member of
Dr Livingstone’s 1858 Zambesi Expedition.
Proposed common names: Kirk’s currant, Kirk-se-taaibos.
Dwarf suffrutescent shrub up to 1 m high, occurring in
central Africa and just reaching as far south as the Capri vi
Strip, Namibia.
R. krebsiana Presl ex Engl. (1883), FSA 13.
After L. Krebs (1792-1844), plant collector and farmer
in the Bedford Dist. of the eastern Cape Province.
Common names: 385.1, false sour currant, bastersuur-
taaibos.
Shrub or small tree up to 3 m high, ranging from near
Graaff-Reinet to Loteni in the Natal Drakensberg.
R. kwazuluana Moffett (1993), FSA 33.
After KwaZulu, the place of the Zulu.
Suggested common names: Kwazulu dwarf currant, Kwa-
zuludwergtaaibos.
Dwarf suffrutescent shrub up to 1 m high, confined to
north eastern Zululand between Mkuzi, Sodwana Bay and
St Lucia.
* should be added to the national list.
R. laevigata L. ( 1763), FSA 1 1 .
(= R. mucronata Thunb.)
Latin for smooth and polished, referring to the shiny
smooth leaflets of var. laevigata.
Two varieties are recognized:
var. laevigata and var. villosa (L. f.) R. Fern. (= R. incana
Mill. & R. villosa L. f.) after the hairy leaves.
Common names: 385.2, dune currant, duinetaaibos.
var. laevigata has been divided into forma laevigata and
forma cangoana Moffett, after the Cango Caves, near
which it occurs.
Proposed common name for forma cangoana: Cango cur-
rant, Kangotaaibos.
Shrub up to 2.5 m high, distributed along the coast and
coastal foreland from Lambert’s Bay in the west to East
London and with a disjunct population near the Cango
Caves, Oudtshoom, Cape Province.
R. lancea L. f. ( 1 78 1 ), FSA 30.
Latin for a light spear or lance, referring to the shape of
the leaflets.
Common names: 386, karree, karee.
Large shrub or spreading trees, usually up to 6 in high, but
sometimes reaching 12 m. Widespread in the more arid
parts of the interior of southern Africa.
R. leptodictya Diels (1907), FSA 26.
(= R. amerina Meikle & R. gueinzii sensu Schon-
land)
Greek for fine or thin net, referring to the network of
veins in the leaflets.
Common names: 387, mountain karree, bergkaree.
Shrub or tree up to 10 m high, widespread over almost the
whole of the Transvaal, also occurring in the Orange Free
State, Botswana and Namibia.
R. longispina Eckl. & Zeyh. (1836), FSA 42.
Latin for long spines, referring to the spinous branch
ends.
Common names: 388, thorny currant, doringtaaibos.
Shrub up to 4 m high, widely distributed in the Karoo
between Worcester, Stutterheim and Queenstown. Also
found in Namaqualand.
R. lucens Hutch. (1946), FSA 27.
Latin for shining, polished, glistening, referring to the
leaflets.
Proposed common name: shiny-leaved rhus, as used in
Zimbabwe.*
Shrub or small tree up to 4.5 m high, found in the north-
eastern corner of Botswana and further in Zimbabwe and
Zambia.
R. lucida L. (1753), FSA 40.
Latin for shining, clear, transparent, referring to the
shiny smooth leaflets which are, however, not clear or
transparent.
Common names: 388.1, glossy currant, blinktaaibos.
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
73
Shrub up to 3 m high, ranging from near Clanwilliam,
Cape in an eastward arc to the Soutpansberg in the northern
Transvaal and also Zimbabwe.
Three forms are distinguished:
forma lucida; forma scoparia (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Moffett (=
R. schlechteri Diels) after the genus Scoparia L. (Scro-
phulariaceae); and forma elliptica (Sond.) Moffett after
the elliptic shape of the leaflets.
R. macowanii Schonland (1930). See R. rehmanniana var.
glabrata.
R. magalismontana Sond. (1860), FSA 22.
(= R. cinerea R. Fern. & A. Fern.)
Latin for Magalies Mountains, referring to the Mag-
aliesberg range in southern Transvaal.
Dwarf shrublet or shrub up to 2.1 m high, occurring in the
Transvaal, northern Cape, Botswana and Zimbabwe.
Three subspecies are distinguished:
subsp. magalismontana
Proposed common names'. Magaliesberg dwarf currant,
Magaliesbergdwergtaaibos.
subsp. coddii (R. Fern. & A. Fern.) Moffett (= R. coddii
R. Fern. & A. Fern. & R. schliebenii R. & A. Fern.) after
L.E. Codd, former Director of the Botanical Research
Institute, Pretoria.
Proposed common names: Soutpansberg currant, Sout-
pansbergtaaibos.
subsp. trifoliolata (Baker f.) Moffett (= R. trifoliolata
Baker f.), after the three-digitate leaves.
R. maricoana Moffett ( 1993), FSA 66.
After Marico, the area where it occurs.
Proposed common names: Marico dwarf currant, Marico-
dwergtaaibos.
Dwarf shrublet up to 1 m high, confined to a small area
near Zeerust, western Transvaal.
R. marlothii Engl. (1888), FSA 24.
After H.W.R. Marloth (1855-1931), Cape Town based
pharmacist, analytical chemist and botanist who for three
years was also Professor of Chemistry at the Victoria
College, Stellenbosch.
Common names: 389.2, bitter karree, bitterkaree.
Shrub up to 2.2 m high, widespread in central Namibia.
R. microcarpa Schonland (1930). See R. pyroides var.
integrifolia.
R. montana Diels (1907), FSA 6.
Latin for mountains, referring to its mountainous hab-
itat.
Common names: 384.1, Drakensberg karree, Drakensberg
karee.
Shrub up to 2.2 m high, occurring in the foothills of the
* should be added to the national list.
Drakensberg between Engcobo, Transkei and Wakker-
stroom, Transvaal.
R. natalensis Bemh. ex Krauss (1844), FSA 37.
After the province of Natal.
Common names: 390, Natal karree, Natalkaree.
Semi-scandent shrub or slender tree up to 5 m high,
occurring in coastal scrub between East London and the
Zululand-Mozambique border.
R. nebulosa Schonland (1930), FSA 12.
Latin for cloudy, possibly referring to the nebulous or
cloud-like inflorescence.
Proposed common names: sand currant, sandtaaibos.*
Scandent shrub up to 4 m high, occurring in coastal scrub
from near Alexandria, Cape Province to Kosi Bay, Tonga-
land.
Two forms are distinguished:
forma nebulosa and forma pubescens Moffett after the
hairy leaflets.
R. pallens Eckl. & Zeyh. (1836), FSA 44.
Latin for pale, referring to the pallid leaflets.
Suggested common names: pale kuni-bush, bleekkoe-
niebos.*
Shrub or small tree up to 7 m high, ranging from the
southwestern Cape eastwards to Natal and also occurring
in the eastern OFS and southwestern Transvaal.
R. pendulina Jacq. ( 1 805), FSA 48.
(= R. viminalis sensu Schonland)
Latin for hanging down, referring to the pendulous or
drooping branches and leaves.
Common names: 396, white karree, witkaree.
Tree up to 10 m high, occurring naturally on the banks of
the Orange River between near Luckhoff in the OFS and
Oranjemund, Namibia. Also found on the banks of the
Olifants and Berg Rivers in the western Cape Province.
R. pentheri Zahlbr. (1900), FSA 34.
After A. Penther (1865-1931), Austrian zoologist and
collector.
Common names: 391, common crow-berry, gewone kraai-
bessie.
Shrub or tree up to 5 m high, ranging from Transkei to the
Soutpansberg, northern Transvaal.
R. pondoensis Schonland (1930), FSA 65.
After Pondoland, where the type specimen was col-
lected.
Proposed common names: many-veined currant, veel-
nerftaaibos.
Slender dwarf shrub up to 1 m high, occurring disjunctly
between Transkei and the northeastern Transvaal.
74
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
R. populifolia E. Mey. ex Sond. ( 1860), FSA 61.
Latin for poplar leaves, referring to the shape of the
leaflets.
Proposed common names: Gariep currant, Garieptaai-
bos.*
Shrub up to 2.5 m high, occurring in the northwestern Cape
and southern Namibia, on either side of the Orange River,
in the area where it is known as the Gariep.
R. problematodes Merxm. & Roessler (1973), FSA 72.
Greek for resembling a problem, referring to the prob-
lems encountered by botanists in determining the taxo-
nomic relationships of this species.
Proposed common names: dwarf spiny currant, dwerg-
doringtaaibos.
Dwarf shrublet up to 0.6 m high, confined to the area
between Aus and Witpiitz, southern Namibia.
R. pterota Presl (1844), FSA 70.
(= R. longispina sensu Schonland)
Greek for winged, referring to the somewhat flattened
petioles.
Suggested common names: spike-thorn currant, pen-
doringtaaibos.*
Shrub usually up to 2 m high, rarely up to 4 m high, ranging
along the coast and adjacent interior from near Bredasdorp
to East London with an isolated population at Langebaan,
western Cape.
R. pyroides Burch. (1822), FSA 15.
Latin for resembling the pear tree (Pyrus), referring to
the pear-like leaflets.
Shrub or small tree up to 6 m high, occurring over virtually
the whole of South Africa excepting the western Cape
Province. Also scattered in Botswana and Namibia.
Four varieties are recognized:
var. pyroides (= R. baurii Schonland)
Common names: 392, common wild currant, gewone
taaibos.
var. dinteri (Engl.) Moffett (= R. dinteri Engl.) after M.K.
Dinter (1868-1945), pioneer South West African botanist.
Proposed common names: Dinter ’s currant, Dinter-se-
taaibos.*
var. gracilis (Engl.) Burtt Davy, after the slender branches.
Proposed common names: mountain currant, bergtaai-
bos.*
var. integrifolia (Engl.) Moffett, after the entire-margined
leaflets, (= R. fraseri Schonland, R. intermedia Schonland
& R. microcarpa Schonland). Despite the name many
specimens have indented margins.
Proposed common names: Natal currant, Nataltaaibos.*
R. quartiniana A. Rich. ( 1 847), FSA 1 6.
After R. Quartin-Dillon, French medical doctor and
naturalist who collected in Ethiopia between 1839 and
1843.
* should be added to the national list.
Common name: 393, glossy velvet karree, blinkfluweel-
karee.
Shrub or small tree up to 7 m high, occurring along river
banks from the northern parts of Botswana and Namibia
through Central Africa to Ethiopia.
R. refracta Eckl. & Zeyh. (1836), FSA 35.
Latin for bent or curved back abruptly, referring to the
almost horizontal pattern of branching.
Proposed common names: rough-leaved currant, growwe-
blaartaaibos.*
Shrub or small tree up to 4 m high, occurring in the eastern
Cape and Transkei.
R. rehmanniana Engl. (1883), FSA 18.
After A. Rehmann (1840-1917), Polish botanist and
collector.
Shrub or more commonly a tree up to 5 m high, ranging
from the southwestern Cape eastwards to the northern
Transvaal.
Two varieties are recognized:
var. rehmanniana
Common names: 393.1, blunt-leaved currant, stompblaar-
taaibos.
var. glabrata (Sond.) Moffett (= R. macowanii Schonland)
after the glabrous or hairless leaves.
Common names: 389, sour currant, suurtaaibos.
R. rigida Mill. (1768), FSA 10.
(= R. eckloniana Sond.)
Latin for rigid, referring to the fairly stiff leaflets.
Shrub up to 1 m high, ranging from the eastern Cape to the
northern Transvaal.
Three varieties are recognized:
var. rigida
Proposed common names: rock currant, kliptaaibos.
var. margaretae Burtt Davy ex Moffett, after Margaret
Moss, one-time curator of the C.E. Moss Herbarium,
Witwatersrand University.
Proposed common names: Margaret’s rock currant, Mar-
garet-se-kliptaaibos.
var. dentata (Engl.) Moffett (=R. dyeri R. Fem. & A. Fern.
& R. rupicola J.M. Wood & M.S. Evans) after the toothed
leaflets.
Proposed common names: Waterberg currant, Water-
bergtaaibos.
R. rimosa Eckl. & Zeyh. (1836), FSA 49.
(= R. rigida sensu Schonland)
Latin for full of cracks, chinks or fissures, referring to
the concentric cracks which develop in the bark of dried
branches.
Proposed common names: Cederberg currant, Sederberg-
taaibos.*
Shrub up to 3 m high, confined to the Cederberg Moun-
tains, western Cape Province.
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
75
R. rogersii Schonland (1930), FSA9.
After Rev. F.A. Rogers (1876-1944), railway missioner
and Archdeacon of Pietersburg.
Proposed common names: Rogers’s currant, Rogers-se-
taaibos.
Shrub up to 2 m high, occurring in the eastern and north-
eastern Transvaal.
R. rosmarinifolia Vahl (1794), FSA 55.
Latin for rosemary leaves, referring to the rosemary-
like leaflets.
Proposed common names: rosemary currant, roosmaryn-
taaibos.
Dwarf shrublet up to 1 m high, ranging from the Ceder-
berg, southwestern Cape Province to the Suurberg, north
of Port Elizabeth.
R. rudatisii Engl. (1921), FSA 64.
After A.G.H. Rudatis (1875-1934), horticulturist and
farmer.
Proposed common names: Rudatis’s dwarf currant. Ruda-
tis-se dwergtaaibos.
Dwarf suffrutescent shrublet up to 0.35 m high, confined
to grassveld in southern Natal.
R. scytophylla Eckl. & Zeyh. ( 1 836), FSA 5 1 .
(= R. africana sensu Schonland)
Greek for leathery leaves, referring to the texture of the
leaflets.
Proposed common names: red-flowered currant, rooi-
blomtaaibos.
Shrub up to 2 m high occurring in the southwestern Cape
Province between Niewoudtville in the north and Caledon
in the south.
Two varieties are recognized:
var. scytophylla and var. dentata Moffett, after the
toothed leaflets.
R. sekhukhuniensis Moffett (1993), FSA 39.
After Sekhukhuniland, where it is endemic.
Proposed common names: Sekhukhune currant, Sekoe-
koenietaaibos.*
Shrub up to 3 m high, occurring between Lydenburg and
Pietersburg, northeastern Transvaal.
R. stenophylla Eckl. & Zeyh. (1836), FSA 56.
Greek for narrow leaves, referring to the leaflets.
Proposed common names: narrow-leaved currant, smal-
blaartaaibos.
Suffrutescent shrub up to 1 .2 m high, only found in the
southwestern Cape.
* should be added to the national list.
R. tenuinervis Engl. ( 1 883), FSA 25.
(= R. commiphoroides Engl. & Gilg)
Latin for thin-nerved, referring to the venation of the
leaflets.
Common names: 393.2, Kalahari currant, Kalaharitaaibos.
Shrub up to 3 m high, widely distributed in Botswana and
Namibia, also reaching the northern Cape and the western
Transvaal.
R. tomentosa L. (1753), FSA 58.
Latin for a thick and even covering of short matted
hairs, referring to the pale downy underside of the leaflets.
Common names: 394, real wild currant, korentebos.
Shrub or small tree up to 5 m high, ranging from the
Cederberg, southwestern Cape eastwards along moister
parts to the northern Transvaal and Zimbabwe.
R. transvaalensis Engl. (1883), FSA 4.
(= R. eburnea Schonland)
After the province of Transvaal.
Common names: 394.1, Transvaal currant, Transvaaltaai-
bos.
Shrub up to 2 m high, rarely a small tree reaching 4 m
occurring between northern Natal and the Soutpansberg,
northern Transvaal.
R. tridactyla Burch. (1822). FSA 28.
Greek and Latin for three fingers, referring to the
leaves.
Proposed common names: Burchell's sour karee, Burchell
se-suurkaree.*
Shrub up to 4 m high, occurring in the northern Cape.
R. tumulicola S. Moore ( 1921), FSA 1 .
(= R. dura Schonland. R. culminum R. Fern. & A.
Fern. & R. synstylica R. Fern. & A. Fern.)
Latin for inhabitant of the mounds or hills, referring to
the farm The Downs’ where the type specimen was col-
lected.
Shrub or small tree up to 3.5 m high, ranging from north-
ern Natal to the Soutpansberg, northern Transvaal and also
Mozambique and Zimbabwe.
Two varieties are recognized:
var. tumulicola
Common names: 38 1 .2, hard-leaved currant, hardetaaibos.
var. meeuseana (R. Fern. & A. Fern.) Moffett, after A.D.J.
Meeuse ( 1 9 1 4-), Dutch botanist and collector.
Proposed common names: velvet currant, fluweeltaaibos.
Two forms of this variety are recognized:
forma meeuseana (= R. ernestii Schonland) and forma
pumila Moffett, after the dwarf habit and small leaves.
R. undulata Jacq. (1798), FSA 45.
(= R. celastroides Sond. & R. excisa Thunb.)
Latin for wavy, referring to the undulate margins of the
leaflets.
Common names: 395. kuni-bush. koeniebos.
76
Bothalia24,l (1994)
Shrub up to 3 m high, occurring from the southern and
southwestern Cape northwards to southern Namibia.
R. volkii Suess. ( 1953), FSA 62.
After O.H. Volk ( 1903-), German botanist and collec-
tor.
Proposed common names : Volk’s currant, Volk-se-taaibos.
Shrub up to 1 .5 m high, confined to a small mountainous
area near Maltahohe, Namibia.
R. wilmsii Diels (1898), FSA 67.
After F. Wilms (1848-1919), German apothecary, bot-
anist and collector.
Proposed common names : Wilms’s dwarf currant, Wilms-
se dwergtaaibos.
Dwarf shrublet up to 0.5 m high, confined to a small area
near Lydenburg, Transvaal.
R. zeyheri Sond. ( 1 860), FSA 47.
(= R. glaucovirens Engl.)
After C.L.P. Zeyher (1799-1858), prolific botanical
collector.
Common names : 396.1, blue currant, bloutaaibos.
Shrub up to 2 m high, rarely a tree up to 4 m high,
distributed widely in the Transvaal interior.
REFERENCES
BAKER. E.G. 1911. Anacardiaceae. In Contribution to the flora of Gaza-
land. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 40: 48-50.
BARKLEY, F.A. & BARKLEY, E.D. 1938. A short history of Rhus to the
time of Linnaeus. American Midland Naturalist 19: 265-333.
BLEEK, D.F. 1956. A bushman dictionary. American Oriental Society,
New Haven.
BRITTEN, J. 1900. Notes on Rhus. Journal of Botany, London 38:
315-317.
BURCHELL, W.J. 1822. Travels in the interior of southern Africa. Vol. 1.
Longman, London.
COATES PALGRAVE, K. 1977. Trees of southern Africa. Struik, Cape
Town.
CODD, L.E. 1956. Anacardiaceae. In New and interesting records of
southern African flowering plants. Bothalia 6: 539, 540.
DE CANDOLLE, A.P. 1825. Prodromus systematis naturalis regni veg-
etabilis Vol. 2. Treuttel & Wiirtz, Amsterdam.
DIELS, F.L.E. 1898. Die Epharmose der Vegetationsorgane bei Rhus L.
Gerontogeae Engl. Botanische Jahrbiicher 24: 568-647.
DIELS, F.L.E. 1907. Anacardiaceae africanae. 4. Botanische Jahrbiicher
40: 86, 87.
DON, G. 1832. A general system of gardening and botany containing a
complete enumeration and description of all plants hitherto
known. Vol. 2. London.
ECKLON, C.F. & ZEYHER, C.L.P. 1 836. Enumeratio plantarum qfricae
australis extra-tropicae ... Part 2. Hamburg.
ENGLER, H.G.A. 1883. Anacardiaceae. In A.L.P.P. & A.C.P. de Can-
dolle, Monographiae Phane rogamarum. Vol. 4.
ENGLER, H.G.A. 1888. Anacardiaceae. In Plantae Marlothianae.
Botanische Jahrbiicher 10: 37, 38.
ENGLER, H.G.A. 1921. Die Pflanzenwelt Afrikas, inbesondere seiner
tropischen Gebiete. Vol. 3,2. Engelmann, Leipzig.
ESTERIIUYSE. C.J. 1983. Karee, tree of the year. Pamphlet 304. De-
partment of Environment Affairs, Pretoria.
GUNN, M. & CODD, L.E. 1981. Botanical exploration of southern
Africa. Balkema, Cape Town.
HUTCHINSON, J. 1946. A botanist in South Africa. Gawthorn, London.
JACQUIN, N.J. VON 1798. Plantarum rariorum horti caesarei schoen-
brunnensis: descriptiones et icones. Vol. 1. Wappler, Vienna.
JACQUIN, N.J. VON 1805. Plantarum rariorum horti caesarei schoen-
brunnensis: descriptiones et icones. Vol. 4. Wappler, Vienna.
KOCH, C. 1853. Hortus dendrologicus. Schneider, Berlin.
KRAUSS, F. 1844. Pflanzen des Cap- und NatalLandes, gesammelt und
zusammengestellt von Dr. Ferdinand Krauss. Flora 27: 346-359.
LEISTNER, O.A. & MORRIS, J.W. 1976. South African place names.
Annals of the Cape Provincial Museums 12.
LINDLEY, J. 1 830. Introduction to the natural system of botany. London.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum. Vol. 1. Stockholm. Facsimile
edn, 1957. Ray Society, London.
LINNAEUS, C. 1763. Species plantarum, 2nd edn, Vol. 2. Stockholm.
LINNAEUS, C. VON (filius). 1781. Supplementum plantarum. Bruns-
wick.
MARCHAND, N.L. 1 869. Revision du groupe des Anacardiacees. J.-B.
Bailliere, Paris.
MCNAIR, J.B. 1925. The taxonomy of poison ivy. Field Museum of
Natural History, Botanical Series 4: 55, 56.
MERXMULLER, H. & ROESSLER, H. 1973. Eine aussergewohnliche
neue Anacardiacee aus Siidwestafrika. Mitteilungen der Botani-
schen Staatssammlung, Miinchen 11: 62-82.
MILLER, P. 1768. The Gardener's dictionary, 8th edn. London.
MOFFETT, R.O. 1988. Rhus acocksii (Anacardiaceae), yet another new
endemic from the Mtamvuna area. South African Journal of Bot-
any 54: 172-174.
MOFFETT, R.O. 1993. Rhus. In O.A. Leistner & E. du Plessis, The Flora
of southern Africa 19,3,1: 1-129.
MOORE, S. LE M. 1921. Anacardiaceae. In Plantae Rogersianae 6.
Journal of Botany, London. 59: 227.
NIENABER, G.S. 1963. Hottentots. Van Schaik, Pretoria.
OLIVER, D. 1868. Anacardiaceae. In Flora of tropical Africa. Vol. 1.
Reeve, London.
ONIONS, C.T. 1956. (ed.). The shorter Oxford English dictionary on
historical principles, 3rd revised edn. Oxford University Press,
London.
PALMER, E.M. & PITMAN. N. 1973. Trees of southern Africa. Vol. 2.
Balkema, Cape Town.
PERSOON. C.H. 1 805. Synopsis plantarum, seu Enchiridium botanicum.
Vol. I. Cramer, Paris.
PETTMAN, C. 1931. South African place names : past and present.
Queenstown Daily Representative, Queenstown.
PRESL, K.B. 1844. Botanische Bemerkungen. Gottlieb Haase, Prague.
RICHARD, A. 1847. Tentamen florae abyssinicae. Vol. 4. Paris.
SCHONLAND, S. 1930. The South African species of Rhus L. Bothalia
3: 3-115.
SCHULTES, J.A. 1820. Pentandra trigynia. In Systema vegetabilium,
15th edn. Stuttgart.
SMITH, C.A. 1966. Common names of South African plants. Memoirs
of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 35.
SONDER, O.W. 1860. Terebintaceae. In Flora capensis. Hodges &
Smith, Dublin.
SUESSENGUTH, K. 1953. Neue Taxa, Kombinationen und Vorkommen
in Siidafrika. Mitteilungen der Botanischen Staatssammlung,
Miinchen 8: 343.
THLINBERG, C.P. 1794. Prodromus plantarum capensium. Part 1. Upp-
sala.
THUNBERG, C.P. 1803. Novae species plantarum capensium ex-
aminatae et descriptae. In D.G.F. Hoffman, Phytographische
Blatter. Schroder, Gottingen.
THUNBERG, C.P. 1818. Flora capensis. Vol. 2,1. Bonnier, Copenhagen.
VAHL, M. 1794. Symbolae botanicae. Part 3. Copenhagen.
VON BREITENBACH, F. 1983. Karree and wild currant: a review of the .
arborescent members of the genus Rhus L. in southern Africa.
Journal of Dendrology 3,3 & 4: 99-160.
VON BREITENBACH, F. 1990. National list of indigenous trees. Den-
drological Foundation, Pretoria.
ZAHLBRUCKNER, A. 1900. Anacardiaceae. In Plantae Pentherianae.
Anndten des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien 15: 52-54.
Bothalia 24,1: 77-90(1994)
Flowering phenology in the arid winter rainfall region of southern Africa
M. STRUCK*
Keywords: climatic variables, flowering sequence, Namaqualand, phenology, precipitation, seasonality, Succulent Karoo, temperature, timing, vigour
of blooming
ABSTRACT
The impact of physical factors on the flowering phenology of a succulent karroid community in the winter rainfall region of
the northwestern Cape, South Africa, based upon a three year study on permanent plots, is examined. On the permanent plots,
flowering of the shrubby species extended over a period of 4 to 4Vl months each year, while blooming of the therophytes peaked
in the first half of the flowering season. Species composition and numbers of individuals in the therophytes and geophytes
offering flowers varied greatly according to the pattern and amount of seasonal precipitation. Despite these variations a
consistent flowering sequence between the years was observed. Possible relations between the flowering phenology and the
climatic variables are discussed in detail. The present data suggest that the onset of flowering is determined indirectly by the first
drop in temperature in autumn, indicating the beginning of the rainy season and presumably the start of the growing period,
and/or by the increase of temperatures in the beginning of spring. The pattern and amount of rainfall within a given season
mainly influenced the duration of anthesis and the number of flowers produced.
UITTREKSEL
Die invloed van fisiese faktore op die blomfenologie van ’n sukkulente karoogemeenskap in die winterreengebied van die
Noordwes-Kaap, Suid-Afrika, gebaseer op ’n driejaar-studie op permanente persele, is ondersoek. Die blomperiode van die
struikagtige spesies op die permanente persele was versprei oor ’n periode van 4 tot 4'/2 maande elke jaar, terwyl die
blomperiode by die terofiete gedurende die eerste helfte van die blomseisoen ’n spits bereik het. Spesiesamestelling en aantal
individue by die terofiete en geofiete wat blom, is sterk beinvloed deur die patroon en hoeveelheid van die jaarlikse neerslag.
Ondanks hierdie variasies is "n reelmatige blomopeenvolging oor die drie jaar waargeneem. Moontlike verhoudings tussen die
blomfenologie en die klimaatveranderlikes word in besonderhede bespreek. Die huidige data dui daarop dat die begin van die
blomseisoen indirek bepaal word deur 'n afname in temperatuur gedurende die herfs, wat die begin van die reenseisoen en
moontlik die begin van die groeiseisoen aandui, en/of deur die toename in temperatuur aan die begin van die lente. Die patroon
en hoeveelheid reenval binne 'n gegewe seisoen beinvloed hoofsaaklik die duur van antese en die aantal blomme wat gevorm
word.
INTRODUCTION
A short but copious blooming is a characteristic feature
of many arid and semi-arid regions. This is particularly
true of Namaqualand in the northwestern Cape, South Af-
rica, which is renowned for its flower displays during
springtime.
For most plant species the growing season is restricted
to the cool and moist autumn-winter-spring period and the
dormant season occurs during the hot and dry summer
months. The growing period usually commences in au-
tumn (March to April) with the sprouting of the perennials
and the germination of the therophytes (Van Rooyen et
«/. 1979; Le Roux et al. 1989). The flowering season lasts
from late winter to spring (August to early October). Dur-
ing this period 90% of the shrubby perennials and virtually
all the annuals are blooming (Le Roux et al. 1989). In
comparison to other regions of winter rainfall climate an-
thesis is markedly synchronized (Orshan et al. 1989).
The overall influence of the climatic factors on the phe-
nological events in arid regions is obvious. With respect
to the phenology of flowering, special attention has been
given to the timing and synchrony of blooming in relation
* Botany Department, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, Ronde-
bosch7700.
to the influence of climatic variables (e.g. Baker et al.
1982; Beatley 1974; Noy-Meir 1973; Solbrig & Yang
1977). Generally, the importance of an opportunistic re-
sponse by the plants to water availability has been
stressed. Compared to other arid areas receiving a similar
amount of average rainfall, the predictability of seasonal
precipitation is relatively high in the arid winter rain-
fall region of the Cape Province (Hoffman & Cowling
1987). Hence, the phenology of the vegetation should
be comparatively predictable, too. However, the question
of the impact of current seasonal weather conditions on
the flowering phenology has not yet been addressed ade-
quately.
Against this background, results of a three year study
of the flowering phenology of a succulent karroid com-
munity of the northwestern Cape are presented. The fol-
lowing questions shall be addressed in particular: 1, how
does the timing and vigour of flowering vary between the
years?; and 2, can the phenological pattern be linked to
the current rainfall and/or temperature conditions, thus
indicating potential environmental cues? The present sur-
vey is clearly constrained by the limited number of plots
and years studied, and the data do not provide a robust
basis for a thorough statistical evaluation. Hence, the fol-
lowing observations should be regarded as indicating
trends.
78
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
METHODS
The field work was carried out at the Goegap Nature
Reserve during the blooming seasons of the years 1985
(late June to October), 1986 (July to late November), and
1987 (mid-August to mid-November).
The records of the actual temperatures and precipita-
tion at Goegap were provided by the authorities of Goegap
Nature Reserve. The data were supplemented by the au-
thor with the aid of a thermohygrograph.
Phenological data were collected for a total of 112
plant species on six permanent plots of 1 00 m2, each. Five
plots were laid out on various sites on a mountain slope
with undisturbed dwarf-scrub vegetation so as to cover
some of the conspicuous variation in species composition.
One plot was marked on a sandy plain with exclusively
ephemeral vegetation showing a particularly high degree
of variation in yearly species composition and plant cover.
The permanent plots are characterized in an Appendix.
For each species onset and duration of anthesis were
recorded. Furthermore, numbers of open flowers or in-
florescences with open flowers were repeatedly counted
at time intervals of three to five (rarely up to seven) days.
Inflorescences and partial inflorescences representing the
functional unit of visitor attraction or pollination (i.e. blos-
soms sensu Faegri & Van der Pijl 1979) were taken as
equivalent to single flowers.
Plant names are mostly according to Gibbs Russell et
al. (1985, 1987).
STUDY SITE
Description of the study site
The Goegap Nature Reserve is situated 12 km east of
Springbok (between S 29°34' and 29°41' and E 17°57'
and 18°02/) in the Namaqualand Rocky Hills in the north-
western Cape, South Africa.
The area is characterized by an open dwarf-scrub vege-
tation which has been classified as ‘Namaqualand Broken
Veld' by Acocks (1988) and as part of the Succulent Karoo
Biome by Rutherford & Westfall ( 1986). Succulent and nar-
row-leaved sclerophyllous species abound. The flora is
clearly dominated by Asteraceae and Mesembryanthemaceae
(Le Roux 1984).
The study area is situated in the realm of the winter
rainfall region. About 70% of the yearly precipitation is
received from April to October and about 38% during the
wettest quarter of the year (June to August) (Table 1).
Drought conditions prevail virtually throughout the year.
All climatic factors are subject to conspicuous annual fluc-
tuations.
Weather conditions during the study
The amount of precipitation as well as the timing and
number of rain events varied considerably between the
study years (Figure 1 ; Tables 1 & 2). Annual rainfall was
highest in 1985 (244.5 mm, i.e. 73% above the average
for the years 1974 to 1987), but much lower in both of
the subsequent years (110.5 mm in 1986, i.e. 22% below
the average and 113.5 mm in 1987, i.e. 20 % below the
average). However, rainfall figures for the main growth
period (April to October) and wettest quarter of a year
(June to August) provide quite a different picture (Tables
I & 2). During the main growth period, 87 mm was re-
ceived in 1985 (35.6% of the year’s total), 81.5 mm in
1986 (73.7% of the year’s total) and 113.5 mm in 1987
(100% of the year’s total). The maximum number of rainy
days was recorded in 1986, especially between June and
mid-September. The relatively high rainfall of 1987 was
due to several exceptionally good rains during April, June,
and August. In contrast, in 1985 drought conditions pre-
vailed in June and during August to September with only
few intermediate rains.
In comparison to the rainfall pattern the annual course
of air temperatures was rather uniform (Figure 1). In each
year, winter minimum values were reached during a pe-
TABLE 1. — Rainfall (mm) in Goegab Nature Reserve 1974-1987, caleulated from data from Le Roux (1984) and unpublished weather data of the
Reserve
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
79
Weekly
temperatures
absolute maximum
mean maximum
mean
mean minimum
absolute minimum
Temperatures for 7-day
intervals not corresponding
to calender weeks
FIGURE 1. — Rainfall and temperature conditions in Goegab Nature Reserve during the study period, A. autumnal drop in temperature; yearly
flowering period; i, rainfall (further details see text).
riod of about five months, after which temperatures in- the cool season appeared to shift from year to year. In
creased again during a period of one to two months to 1985 the mean monthly temperatures dropped consider-
reach summer values (Table 3). Nevertheless, the onset of ably during March, but only during April in both of the
80
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
TABLE 2.-Monthly rainfall and number of rainy days (in brackets) dur-
ing the main growth period (April to October) 1985 to 1987
subsequent years. The coldest quarter of a year was June
to August. Mean and absolute minima occurred during
July in 1985 (13.8 / 1.0°C) and 1986 (12.8 / -1.0°C), but
during August in 1987 (1 1.6 / 0.5°C). Mean and absolute
maxima occurred during February (26.3 / 48.0°C) in 1985,
during December (28.2 / 45.5°C) in 1986, and during Jan-
uary (26.2 / 48.0°C) in 1987.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Numbers of species in flower
In total, 112 species were observed in flower on the
permanent plots during the present study. Of these, 44%
flowered in 1985, 95% in 1986, and 79% in 1987. These
variations were mainly attributable to the phenological
performance of therophytes and geophytes (Table 4).
The number of therophytic species flowering in a given
year seems to be related to the amount and distribution
of rainfall occurring during the two months before the
onset of the flowering season. In 1985 only 25.5 mm fell
during this period, whereas in both of the subsequent years
the figure was nearly twice as high (1986: 46 mm, 1987:
50.5 mm; Table 2; Figure 1).
In 1985, the flowering was also affected by unfavour-
able weather conditions during the flowering period itself,
as shown in Figure 2. In that year, a dry period set in
after the initial rains at the onset of the blooming season
(Figure 1 and Table 2) causing drought stress particularly
for the therophytes. A good rain in mid-September, how-
ever, stimulated active growth and flowering.
Very few plant species growing on the permanent plots
flowered during summer. These are Othonna furcata
(March and April), Tylecodon wallichii (end of November
to beginning of December), the therophyte Tribulus ter-
restris (April), and the hysteranthous geophyte Erio-
spermum paradoxum (March and April; all dates after Van
Rooyen et al. 1979).
Timing and sequence of flowering
In each year, the blooming season lasted 4 to 4lA
months. However, the exact timing varied markedly be-
tween the years. In 1985, most plants flowered from early
July until the end of October, whereas in both of the sub-
sequent years blooming commenced about four weeks
later, in early August, and continued until the end of No-
vember (Figure 1).
TABLE 3.-Temperature regime in Goegab during the study period 1985 to 1987. Data from unpublished weather report Goegab Nature Reserve
and own measurements by thermohygrograph
x, mean monthly temperature; x (max.), mean maxima; x (min.), mean minima; abs. max., absolute maxima; abs. min., absolute minima; d, differ-
ences between means of consecutive months.
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
81
TABLE 4. — Number of flowering species observed on the permanent
plots listed according to their life form
Despite the temporal fluctuation in the onset of the
flowering season the sequence of flowering of the species
involved remained nearly constant (see flowering se-
quence for plot 1 in Figure 3), i.e. independent of the
current pattern of precipitation in a given year. Such con-
sistent sequences of flowering phenologies have been de-
scribed from areas of virtually all climatic zones (Heinrich
1976; Heithaus 1974; Hocking 1968; Kratochwil 1984;
Mooney et al. 1974; Pierce 1984; Reader 1975; Stiles
1977). Considerable yearly variations in flowering dates,
but unaltered flowering sequences have also been reported
from southwestern Spain (Arroyo 1990). In Goegab the
shrubby species make up the 'backbone' of the sequence,
while therophytes and geophytes close the ranks in sea-
sons when their specific requirements in terms of moisture
and temperature conditions are met. This basic pattern re-
mained unchanged, though the vigour of blooming varied
greatly between years (see below). Taxonomically related
species usually flowered sequentially, with their flowering
periods slightly overlapping (e.g. Euphorbia, Hermannia,
Ruschia spp.; for further details see Struck 1992).
In the present observations no recurring pattern be-
tween the timing and/or amount of precipitation and the
timing of flowering in single species or the timing of the
blooming season in general were detected, though the vig-
our of flowering appeared to be stimulated by single rain-
fall events in single cases (see below).
Moreover, the present data do not indicate that flow-
ering of the therophytes was stimulated by drought. This
is in contrast to a view widely accepted for desert annuals
(Fox 1990a, b; Rathcke & Lacey 1985). Yet, recent ex-
perimental and field demographic studies (Aronson et al.
1992; Fox 1989, 1990b; Van Rooyen et al. 1991) indicate
that water stress had little or no effect on the induction
of flowering.
Conversely, a correlation was found between the au-
tumnal drop in temperatures and the onset of the blooming
season: as mentioned above, mean monthly temperatures
dropped considerably during March in 1985. but only dur-
ing April in both of the subsequent years (Table 3). The
blooming season started about three months later in each
year, namely in early July in 1985 and about early August
in both of the subsequent years. It should be noted that
the amount and distribution of rainfall during autumn dif-
fered notably between the years (Figure 1). The autumnal
drop in temperature corresponds to the beginning of the
winter rainy season and presumably marks the onset of
the growing period for the plants (Van Rooyen et al.
1979).
With regard to the weekly temperatures (or mean tem-
peratures of 7-day-intervals not corresponding to calendar
weeks) during autumn (Figure 1), the first cool interval
occurred in mid-March in 1985, during the second week
of April in 1986, and about the end of April in 1987 (with
5.0, 5.9, and 3.1°C below the means of the respective
months). These temperature events shifted for about 25
days between 1985 and 1986 and for about 10 days be-
tween 1986 and 1987.
This situation is reflected in the yearly shift of flow-
ering dates of selected perennial species (shift 1985/86:
about 3 weeks, 1986/87: 4 to 7 days, see Table 5). Though
the data show a high degree of variation, the differences
appeared to be significant. In contrast, the average shift
in flowering dates for selected annuals was 14 and 7 days,
respectively. Yet, due to the generally low proportion of
annuals in the plots, particularly during drier blooming
seasons, the results remain ambiguous (Table 5). However,
the lesser yearly shift of flowering dates of annuals may
also indicate other influences, e.g. a delay of flowering
by low temperatures during the winter period (Van
Rooyen et al. 1979). Low temperatures have been shown
to lengthen the time between flower initiation and anthesis
in therophytes (Van Rooyen et al. 1991). One could expect
such an effect for 1985 and 1987 when the cool winter
period overlapped with the onset of the blooming period,
i.e. when most annuals started to flower. Given this, the
differences in flowering dates should be less between
1985/86, but more between 1986/87 compared to the per-
ennials. This is what Table 5 indicates. However, the pos-
sibility that this is merely coincidence, cannot be ruled
out.
In some species flowering dates differed conspicuously
in various places of the study area (e.g. up to a month in
Ruschia robusta). Similar observations have also been re-
ported from other arid regions (e.g. Turner & Randall
1987 and references cited therein). Whether these differ-
ences reflect small-scale variations in soil conditions or
intra-specific genetic variability, is not known.
EIGURE 2. — Perccnluge ol species flowering simultaneously (cumula-
tive for all plots, 100%= 1 12 species). Solid line= 1985: stippled
line = 1986; dotted line = 1987.
82
Bothalia 24.1 ( 1994)
.
...••• ****.*••••****
r;::. •••••••*
t§ ! i l-S :
•S I ! '-5 fe d '
“ 's -I §» ! «
sill's
Iitiini!
?! §§!T“=“
£ c S
Si
? 2
is
o o
if! Ill
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
83
TABLE 5. — Yearly differences between dates of initial flowering and dates of peak bloom for selected species. Species poorly represented in the
study sites, including all geophytes, were omitted
n, sample size; x, mean; s, standard deviation; V, coefficients of variation, U, significance after Mann-Whitney U test.
Some of the species under present study were reported
to flower one to two months earlier (in 1974, Van Rooyen
et al. 1979) or later (in 1981, Le Roux et al. 1989) than
observed during the present survey. Nevertheless, the se-
quence of flowering of the species involved generally
matches the present results. Unfortunately, a further com-
parison is not possible, because the authors collected phe-
nological data in a notably larger area, notwithstanding
the small-scale variations of flowering dates. Besides, rel-
evant weather data are lacking for the above-mentioned
years.
Numbers of flowers and duration of flowering
The great majority of the observed species produce
large numbers of flowers over a time span of several
weeks (‘cornucopia’. Gentry 1974). In these species the
maximum numbers of flowers (or inflorescences, if re-
garded as the functional unit of visitor attraction or pol-
lination) offered simultaneously, varied from a few
thousand to tens of thousands (up to 40 000 per 100 m2
in Galenia sarcophylla [Aizoaceae] on plot 6 in 1986).
Conversely, all observed geophytes as well as some
chamaephytes and therophytes produced but a few flowers
per day over a period of several weeks or more (‘steady
state’. Gentry 1974). Of these the perennial climber
Microloma sagittatum (Asclepiadaceae) showed the long-
est flowering period ( 120 days). A transitional phenolog-
ical pattern was shown by some species which produced
moderate numbers of flowers over an extensive period
(e.g. the succulent shrublet Crassula muscosa subsp.
muscosa flowering more than 70 days, the therophytic Os-
teospermum hyoseroides and O. amplectens flowering for
95 days).
As already mentioned, blooming of the therophytes
was generally rather poor in 1985, but was markedly better
in 1986 and 1987. The shrubby species responded rather
differently to seasonal moisture availability: generally,
non-succulent shrubs showed the highest production of
flowers in the moist years 1986 (most Asteraceae) and
1987 (Lebeckia sericea [Fabaceae]), whereas succulents
(most Mesembryanthemaceae, Euphorbia spp.) flowered
most prolifically in the comparatively dry season of 1985.
Beside the seasonal moisture availability, single rainfall
events appeared to stimulate the vigour of flowering in
certain cases. An example is the good rain in early Sep-
tember 1985, which ended a short drought period (Figure
1). After that shower, several therophytes and chamae-
phytes produced a further minor bloom (Figure 3). Given
a causal relationship between these incidents, the species
did, nevertheless, not respond to similar rain events (in
terms of amount and timing of precipitation) in the sub-
sequent years.
Furthermore, ‘small rainfall events’ ( sensu Sala &
Lauenroth 1982) seemed to stimulate flowering in thero-
phytes: several species in plot 6 (e.g. Senecio arenarius,
Leysera tenella ) showed a slight, though remarkable in-
crease in the numbers of flowers after sparse rains (below
5 mm) occurring during September and the beginning of
October 1986 and 1987. This is in contrast to the findings
of various authors (for references see Sala & Lauenroth
1982) who only regard rain events of at least 8-10 mm
(‘effective rainfall event’ sensu Noy-Meir 1973) as eco-
logically significant.
The duration of flowering of most taxa ranged from
10 to 80 days. Only the geophytes showed short flowering
periods of 20 to 30 days in all three years. Due to the
adverse climatic conditions during the growth period of
1985, most therophytes had a comparatively short flow-
ering period (and low flower numbers) in that year. On
the other hand, duration of flowering of most therophytes
was clearly longer in 1987 than in 1986 (the year with
the maximum number of flowering therophytic species,
see Table 4).
No specific pattern of skewness in the flowering
phenologies could be detected: flowering may begin
abruptly and then tail off in one year but may start slowly
and end more quickly in another year. In species showing
the ‘cornucopia’ type of flowering pattern the duration of
full bloom (defined as the time interval with at least 50%
of a species’ maximum number of flowers in anthesis)
was longest in the year with the highest numbers of flow-
ers and shortest in the year with the lowest numbers of
flowers, i.e. a lower flower production was not compen-
sated for by an extended duration of flowering.
84
Bothalia24,l (1994)
CONCLUSIONS
A high degree of phenological variation on the species
level, and to a lesser extent between populations, is an
outstanding feature of the plant community studied. The
present observations revealed that the timing of flowering
and the vigour of blooming varied independently within
the species under study. Conversely, the flowering se-
quence of given species remained largely unaltered during
the years.
Regarding the possible impact of climatic variables, it
is inferred that the timing of flowering is indirectly deter-
mined by the first considerable drop in air temperatures
in autumn and/or by the increase of temperatures in the
beginning of spring. In contrast, species composition and
number of individuals of therophytes and geophytes in
flower are greatly affected by the pattern and amount of
seasonal precipitation. The same applies to the number of
blossoms produced. Due to fluctuations in seasonal rain-
fall the vigour of a species’ blooming may be promoted
in one year and retarded in another. Yet, potential pheno-
logical responses seem also to be related to morphological
and physiological constrains: e.g. non-succulent shrubs
produced the greatest number of flowers in moister years,
whereas succulents flowered most prolifically in a dry
year.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This paper is based on a dissertation submitted in par-
tial fulfilment of the requirements of the Dr rer. nat. at
the University of Hamburg (Germany). I am indebted to
my supervisor. Prof. Dr H.-D. Ihlenfeldt for his encour-
agement and constant support. I would like to express my
thanks to the directors of the Department of Nature and
Environmental Conservation in Cape Town and Jonkers-
hoek for permission to work in the Goegap Nature Re-
serve and the Officers in Charge for logistical support
during my stays. For identifications of plant specimens I
appreciate the assistance of Dr V. Bittrich, Dr N. Jurgens,
A. le Roux, and Dr K. Steiner. Special thanks are due to
A. and G. Cloete, C. Eardley, Dr S.K. Gess, Dr F.W. Gess,
E. van Jaarsveld, A. le Roux and Dr V. Whitehead for
their generous support during my stays in South Africa.
Furthermore, I would like to thank Drs M. Gerbaulet, S.K.
Gess, F.W. Gess, and unknown referees for comments on
drafts of the manuscript. E. van Jaarsveld and E. du Plessis
provided the Afrikaans version of the abstract. The work
was funded in part by the Deutsche Forschungs- gemein-
schaft and by the Akademisches Auslandsamt of the Uni-
versity of Hamburg, for which I am very grateful.
REFERENCES
ACOCKS, J PH. 1988. Veld Types of South Africa, 3rd edn. Memoirs of
the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 57.
ARONSON, J„ KIGEL, J„ SHMIDA, A. & KLEIN, J. 1992. Adaptive
phenology of desert and mediterranean populations of annual
plants grown with and without water stress. Oecologia 89: 17-26.
ARROYO, J. 1990. Spatial variation of flowering phenology in the
mediterranean shrublands of southern Spain. Israel Journal of
Botany 39: 249-262.
BAKER, G.A., RUNDEL, RW. & PARSONS, D.J. 1982. Comparative
phenology and growth in three chaparral shrubs. Botanical Ga-
zette 143: 94-100.
BEATLEY, J.C. 1974. Phenological events and their environmental trig-
gers in Mojave Desert ecosystems. Ecology 55: 856-863.
FAEGRI, K. & VAN DER P1JL, L. 1979. The principles of pollination
biology, 3rd edn. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
FOX, G.A. 1989. Consequences of flowering-time variation in a desert
annual: adaptation and history. Ecology 70: 1294-1306.
FOX, G.A. 1990a. Drought and the evolution of flowering time in desert
annuals. American Journal of Botany 77: 1508-1518.
FOX, G.A. 1990b. Components of flowering time variation in a desert
annual. Evolution 44: 1404-1423.
GENTRY, A.H. 1974. Co-evolutionary patterns in Central American
Bignoniaceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 61: 728-
759.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., REID, C., VAN ROOY, J. & SMOOK, L. 1985.
List of species of southern African plants, 2nd edn, part 1. Mem-
oirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 5 1 .
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., WELMAN, W.G., RETIEF, E„ 1MMELMAN,
K.L., GERMISHUIZEN, G„ PIENAAR, B.J., VAN WYK, M. &
NICHOLAS, A. 1987. List of species of southern African plants,
2nd edn, part 2. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa
No 56.
HEINRICH, B. 1976. Flowering phenologies: bog, woodland, and dis-
turbed habitats. Ecology 57: 890-899.
HEITHAUS, E.R. 1974. The role of plant pollinator interaction in deter-
mining community structure. Annals of the Missouri Botanical
Garden 6 1 : 675-691 .
HOCKING, B. 1968. Insect-flower associations in the high Arctic with
special reference to nectar. Oikos 19: 359-388.
HOFFMAN, M.T. & COWLING. R.M. 1987. Plant physiognomy, phe-
nology and demography. In R.M. Cowling & PW. Roux, The
Karoo Biome: a preliminary synthesis. Part 2 — vegetation and
history. South African National Scientific Programmes Report
No. 142: 1-34.
KRATOCHWIL, A. 1984. Pflanzengesellschaften und Bliitenbesucher-
Gemeinschaften: biozonologische Untersuchungen in einem
nicht mehr bewirtschafteten Halbtrockenrasen (Mesobrometum)
im Kaiserstuhl (Siidwestdeutschland). Phvtocoenologia 11: 455-
669.
LE ROUX, A. 1984. 'n Fitososiologiese studie van die Hester Malan-
Natuurreservaat. M.Sc. thesis, University of Pretoria.
LE ROUX, A., PERRY, P. & KYRIACOU, X. 1989. South Africa. In G.
Orshan, Plant phenomorphological studies in mediterranean type
ecosystems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
MOONEY, H.A., PARSONS, D.J. & KUMMEROW, J. 1974. Plant
development in mediterranean climates. In H. Lieth, Phenology
and seasonality modeling. Ecological Studies 8: 255-268.
Springer Verlag, New York.
NOY-MEIR, I. 1973. Desert ecosystems: environment and producers.
Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 25-51.
ORSHAN, G„ FLORET, Ch„ LE FLOC'H, E„ LE ROUX, A., MONTE-
NEGRO, G. & ROMANE, F. 1989. General synthesis. In G.
Orshan. Plant phenomorphological studies in mediterranean type
ecosystems : 389-399. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
PIERCE, S.M. 1 984. A synthesis of plant phenology in the Fynbos Biome.
South African National Scientific Programmes Report No. 88.
Pretoria.
RATHCKE, B. & LACEY, E.P 1985. Phenological patterns of terrestrial
plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16: 179-214.
READER. R.J. 1975. Competitive relationships of some bog ericads for
major insect pollinators. Canadian Journal of Botany 53: 1 300—
1305.
RUTHERFORD, M.C. & WESTFALL, R.H. 1986. Biomes of southern
Africa — an objective categorization. Memoirs of the Botanical
Survey of South Africa No. 54.
SALA, O.E. & LAUENROTH, W.K. 1982. Small rainfall events: an
ecological role in semi-arid regions. Oecologia (Berl.) 53: 30 1 —
304.
SOLBRIG, O.T. & YANG, T.W. 1977. Strategies in relation to timing of
blooming and fruiting. In G.H. Orians & O.T. Solbrig, Conver-
gent evolution in warm deserts, US/IBP Synthesis Series 3: 83-90.
STILES. F.G. 1977. Ecology, flowering phenology, and humming bird
pollination of some Costa Rican Heliconia. Ecology 56: 285-302.
STRUCK, M. 1992. Pollination ecology in the arid winter rainfall region
of southern Africa: a case study. Mitteilungen aus dem Institut fiir
Allgemeine Botanik Hamburg 24: 61-90.
TURNER, F.B. & RANDALL, D.C. 1987. The phenology of desert
shrubs in southern Nevada. Journal of Arid Environments 13:
119-128.
VAN ROOYEN, M.W., THERON, G.K. & GROBBELAAR, N. 1979.
Phenology of the vegetation in the Hester Malan Nature Reserve
in the Namaqualand Broken Veld: 1. General observations. Jour-
nal of South African Botany 45: 279-293.
VAN ROOYEN, M.W., GROBBELAAR, N„ THERON, G.K. & VAN
ROOYEN, N. 1991. The ephemerals of Namaqualand: effects of
photoperiod, temperature and moisture stress on development and
flowering of three species. Journal of Arid Environments 20:
15-29.
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
85
APPENDIX
Habitat, species composition, percentage of plant cover and flowering phenology of the permanent plots. Where species flowered twice during a
flowering season, number of days of flowering (fourth column) are given separated by '+’ . *+’ put before the number of days indicates that flowering
started before an observation period, ‘+’ put behind means that flowering continued after an observation period. Floral units counted (sixth column)
were single flowers unless stated otherwise. Names of plant communities follow Le Roux (1984).
Plot 1. Ruschia robusta-Eriocephalus ericoides Community facies 1: open dwarf-scrub with low proportion of therophytes on NE slope, 5%
inclination, at SE side of Carolusberg
Ch, chamaephytes; NP, nanophanerophytes; T, therophytes; G, geophytes; Ca, capitula; Cy, cyathia; Inf, inflorescences or flower aggregates.
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
Plot 2. Didelta spinosa-Ruschia cymosa Community: moderately dense scrub with low proportion of therophytes on SSE slope, 20% inclination at
SE side of Carolusberg
Ch, chamaephytes; NP, nanophanerophytes; T, therophytes; G, geophytes; Ca, capitula; Cy, cyathia; Inf, inflorescences or flower aggregates.
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
87
Plot 3. Ruschia robusta-Eriocephcilus ericoides Community: open scrub and dwarf-scrub with moderate proportion of therophytes on WSW slope,
6% inclination, at SE side of Carolusberg
Ch, chamaephytes; NP, nanophanerophytes; T. therophytes; G, geophytes; Ca, capitula; Cy, cyathia; Inf, inflorescences or flower aggregates.
Plot 4. Ruschia robusta-Eriocephalus ericoides Community: moderately dense scrub and dwarf-scrub with high proportion of therophytes on SE
slope, 8% inclination, at SE side of Carolusberg
Bothalia 24,1 ( 1994)
Ch, chamaephytes; NP, nanophanerophytes; T, therophytes; G, geophytes; Ca, capitula; Cy, cyathia; Inf, inflorescences or flower aggregates.
Plot 5. Ruschia robusta-Eriocephalus ericoides Community facies 1: open dwarf-scrub with high proportion of therophytes on SSW slope, 6%
inclination, at SE side of Carolusberg
Bothalia 24,1 (1994) 89
Ch, chamaephytes; NP, nanophanerophytes; T. therophytes; G. geophytes; Ca, capitula; Cy, cyathia; Inf. inflorescences or flower aggregates.
Plot 6. Diverse ephemeral vegetation with therophytes and some geophytes on disturbed NW slope, 1% inclination, on alluvial plain (glacis)
90
Zaluzianskya benthamiana T
Tribulus zeyheri T
Tetragonia microptera T
Ifloga paronychioides T
Oncosiphon suffruticosum T
Aizoon canariense subsp. paucandrum T
Conicosia elongata G
Oxalis grammopetala G
Gladiolus orchidiflorus G
Albuca cooperi G
Homeria schlechteri G
Ornithoglossum vulgare G
Omithogalwn secundum G
Total cover [%]
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
* dried fructiferous plants of the previous season.
Ch, chamaephytes; NP, nanophanerophytes; T, therophytes; G, geophytes; Ca, capitula; Cy, cyathia; Inf, inflorescences or flower aggregates.
25
50
25
Bothalia 24,1: 91-99 (1994)
Miscellaneous notes
VARIOUS AUTHORS
ASTERACEAE
CHROMOSOME COUNTS FOR SEVEN SPECIES OF CINERARIA (SENECIONEAE)
Cineraria L. belongs to the ‘senecioid- genera in the
tribe Senecioneae of the family Asteraceae, which have
the basic chromosome number of x = 10 (Nordenstam
1977). Grant (1971 : 228) notes that 533 taxonomic species
in the Dicotyledonae have the gametic (haploid) chromo-
some number of 10.
Counts for only two species of Cineraria have been
published in the chromosome indices of Moore (1973)
and Goldblatt (1981): C. aspera Thunb. 2x = 20 and 4x
= 40 (Nordenstam 1969); C. grandiflora Vatke (now C.
deltoidea Sond.) 2x = 20 (Turner & Lewis 1965) and 4x
= 40 (Hedberg & Hedberg 1977).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Mitotic counts were made from root tips of germinated
seeds. Standard methods of pretreatment in 0.2 M 8-
hydroxyquinoline for four hours at room temperature (±
19°C) (Darlington & La Cour 1976), storage in Carnoy’s
fixative (absolute alcohol: glacial acetic acid : chloroform:
formalin in the ratio 5:1: 1:0.5), and staining in lacto-pro-
pionic orcein (Dyer 1963) were used. The root tips were
hydrolysed in 5N HC1 for 35^10 minutes at room tem-
perature, followed by two rinses in distilled water.
Meiotic counts were made from young anthers follow-
ing the method described by Turner & Lewis (1965). The
buds were collected in the field and placed in a freshly
mixed solution of chloroform : absolute alcohol : glacial
acetic acid (4:3: 1), and then processed through a graded
alcohol series and stored in 70% alcohol. Staining was
achieved using acetocarmine and iron acetate (Darlington
& La Cour 1976).
As the chromosomes were very small (1.5-4.0 pm),
repeated counts of pollen mother cells and of root tips
were made to ensure accuracy. Voucher specimens, as
listed in Table 1, are housed in the C.E. Moss Herbarium
(J), University of the Witwatersrand.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The results of the chromosome counts from mitotic
and meiotic preparations are summarised in Table 1 . They
corroborate the published chromosome numbers for Cine-
raria. The most common chromosome number in the spe-
cies investigated was a diploid number of 20. Three of
the species show evidence of polyploidy with 2n = 40.
C. grandibracteata possibly has both levels of ploidy
within one population. There is no evidence of aneuploidy
in any of the species investigated thus far.
The population of C. deltoidea from the Natal Mid-
lands ( Cron & Scott-Shaw 11) was found to have a chro-
mosome number of n = 20, the same as that of the popu-
lations from Kenya and Tanzania examined by Turner &
Lewis (1965), and by Hedberg & Hedberg (1977).
Polyploidy is common in the Asteraceae (Grant 1971)
and it is evident that further sampling of populations of
the different species is required to ascertain whether dip-
loidy and polyploidy exist in the same populations and/or
species. This would also be a prerequisite before differ-
ences in chromosome number could be used to distinguish
different species.
The frequency of polyploidy in higher plants has been
positively correlated with increase in latitude and altitude
(Grant 1971; Love & Love 1967). C. albicans and C.
grandibracteata are both frequently found at high alti-
tudes, the latter species often in the mist belt of mountain
tops. The fact that polyploidy does exist in C. albicans
indicates that speciation may occur more rapidly in this
species than in those species shown thus far to be diploid.
Stebbins (1950: 359) notes that polyploidy is ‘widely
TABLE 1. The chromosome numbers obtained from root tips and pollen mother cells for species of Cineraria
92
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
recognised as one of the principal methods for the forma-
tion of new species among higher plants’, but that the
species originating from this process are usually ‘very
similar to their diploid ancestors in external morphology
and ecological preferences’. C. albicans is a highly vari-
able species (Hilliard 1977; Cron 1991) and may well be
a species complex or in the process of speciating (Cron
1991). Characters such as the size and persistence of the
petiolar auricles, the glabrescence of the involucral bracts
and the indumentum of the cypselae show great variation.
(Note; the ‘species A’ of Hilliard ( 1977) is here considered
to be part of C. albicans.) Apparent isolation of popula-
tions of C. albicans in the gorges comprising valley
bushveld in the Natal midlands and coastal areas, and in
Transkei has evidently resulted in variability becoming
fixed in certain areas (Dubinin 1940). Similarly, isolation
on mountain tops in Lesotho, Natal and in the eastern
Cape has resulted in marked variation in the features noted
above.
C. deltoidea , as described by Jeffrey ( 1986), is the most
wide-ranging of the species, occurring in the eastern high-
lands of Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania, and Malawi, the
Zoutpansberg in the Transvaal, and the Natal midlands
and coastal regions of Natal and the Transkei. It is a very
variable species, with especially distinctive variants oc-
curring on some mountain massifs (Jeffrey 1986) and it
is therefore not surprising that polyploid populations exist.
The presence of polyploidy in the genus Cineraria is
thus confirmed, with a diploid chromosome number of 20
in six species and a polyploid chromosome number of 40
in three species.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was made possible by bursaries from the
FRD and the University of the Witwatersrand while the
senior author was reading for an M. Sc.
REFERENCES
CRON, G.V. 1991. A systematic study of certain species of Cineraria L.
(Asteraceae). M.Sc. thesis, University of the Witwatersrand. Jo-
hannesburg.
DARLINGTON, C.D. &LACOUR, F.L. 1976. The handling of chromo-
somes. George Allen & Unwin, London.
DUBININ, N.R 1940. Darwinism and the genetics of populations.
Uspekhi Sovremennoi Biologii 13: 276-305.
DYER, R.A. 1963. The use of lactopropionic orcein in rapid squash
methods for chromosome preparations. Stain Technology 38: 85-
90.
GOLDBLATT. P. 1981. Index to plant chromosome numbers 1975-1978.
Monographs in Systematic Botany 5. Braun-Brumfield, Ann
Arbor, Michigan.
GRANT, V.E. 1971. Plant speciation. Columbia University Press, New
York and London.
HEDBERG, I. & HEDBERG, O. 1977. Chromosome numbers of
afroalpine and afromontane angiosperms. Botaniska Notiser 1 30:
1-24.
HILLIARD, O.M. 1977. Compositae in Natal. University of Natal Press,
Pietermaritzburg.
JEFFREY, C. 1986. The Senecioneae in East tropical Africa. Kew Bulletin
41: 873-943.
LOVE, A. & LOVE, D. 1967. Polyploidy and altitude: Mt Washington.
Biologisclies Zentralhlatt. Supplementary Volume : 307-312.
MOORE, R.J. 1973. Index to plant chromosome numbers 1967-1971.
Regnum vegetabile 90. Oosthoek's Uitgeversmaatschappij B.V.,
Utrecht, Netherlands.
NORDENSTAM, B. 1969. Chromosome studies on South African vascu-
lar plants. Botaniska Notiser 122: 398—408.
NORDENSTAM, B. 1977. Senecioneae and Liabeae — systematic re-
view. In V.H. Heywood, J.B. Harbome & B.L. Turner, The biol-
ogy and chemistry of the Compositae. Vol. 2: 799-830. Academic
Press, London and New York.
STEBBINS, G.L. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia
University Press, New York.
TURNER, B.L. & LEWIS, W.H. 1965. Chromosome numbers in the
Compositae. IX. African species. Journal of South African Botany
31:207-217.
G.V. CRON*. B-E. VAN WYK** and P.L.D. VINCENT*
* Department of Botany, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3,
Wits 2050.
** Department of Botany, Rand Afrikaans University, P.O. Box 524,
Johannesburg 2000.
MS. received: 1993-03-01.
POACEAE
A CYTOTAXONOMIC STUDY OF SOME REPRESENTATIVES OF THE TRIBE CYNODONTEAE (CHLORIDOIDEAE)
Poaceae is divided into five major subfamilies. One of
these subfamilies, Chloridoideae Rouy, is represented by
approximately 50 genera and 232 species in southern Af-
rica (Gibbs Russell et al. 1990). One of the tribes of the
Chloridoideae, Cynodonteae Dumort., commonly occurs
in unstable communities (Clayton & Renvoize 1986).
Cynodonteae has four subtribes, of which two were stud-
ied, namely Chloridinae Presl and Zoysiinae Benth. The
following genera of the subtribe Chloridinae are included
in this study; Chloris Sw., Cynodon Rich., Eustachys
Desv., Harpochloa Kunth, Microchina R. Br., and Rendlia
Chiov. The only genus in the sublribe Zoysiinae studied,
is Tragus Haller.
The aim of this study is to establish the chromosome
numbers of the different genera and species.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The material was collected and fixed in the field.
Voucher herbarium specimens are housed in the Geo Potts
Herbarium, Department of Botany and Genetics, Univer-
sity of Orange Free State, Bloemfontein (BLFU) or the
National Herbarium, Pretoria (PRE).
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
Chloris gayana Kunth: n = 10.
TRANSVAAL. — 2428 (Nylstroom): Soutpan Experimental Station,
(-CD), Spies 3727. 2528 (Pretoria): Sphinx Station, (-CA), Spies 2021.
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
93
C. virgata Swartz: n = 10.
ORANGE FREE STATE.— 2827 (Senekal): 6 km from Clocolan to
Peka bridge, (-DC), Spies 4799. 2926 (Bloemfontein): on the U.O.F.S.
campus, (-AA), Spies 5151, 5161, 5164, 5165, 5174', 26 km from
Dewetsdorp to Hobhouse, (-DB), Spies 4783.
CAPE. — 3026 (Aliwal North): Aliwal North, (-DA), Spies 5245,
5249.
Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.: n = 18.
CAPE. — 3026 (Aliwal North): Aliwal North, (-DA), Spies 5248.
3318 (Cape Town): on the top of Botmaskloof Pass, (-BD), Spies 4424.
3420 (Bredasdorp): De Hoop Nature Reserve, (-E>C), Spies 4626.
Eustachys paspaloides (Vahl) Lanza & Mattei: n = 20.
TRANSVAAL. — 2530 (Lydenburg): 10 km from Boshoek to
Buffelsvlei, (-AC), Spies 1521.
Harpochloa falx (L. f.) Kuntze: n = 20, 25, 30.
TRANSVAAL. — 2430 (Pilgrim’s Rest): 4 km from Pilgrim's Rest to
Graskop, (-BA), Spies 5134 (n = 20); 25 km from Sabie to Lydenburg,
(-BA), Spies 5140 (n = 20). 2530 (Lydenburg): Nederhorst turnoff on
Lydenburg-Roossenekal road, (-AA), Spies 5128 (n = 30); 1 1 km from
Dulistroom to Lydenburg via Frischgewaagd, (-AC), Spies 5118 (n =
25); 16 km from Dulistroom to Lydenburg via Frischgewaagd, (-AC),
Spies 5125 (n = 30); 5 km from Belfast to Dulistroom, (-CA), Spies
5113 (n = 20).
ORANGE FREE STATE. — 2729 (Volksrust): 53 km from Harrismith
to Newcastle via Normandien Pass, (-DC), Spies 5063 (n = 20); 92 km
from Harrismith to Normandien Pass, (-DC), Spies 5065 (n = 20); 97
km from Harrismith to Normandien Pass, (-DC), Spies 5078 (n = 20).
CAPE. — 3027 (Lady Grey): 45 km from Barkly East to Rhodes,
(-DD), Spies 3986 (n = 20); 52 km from Rhodes via Lundeansnek,
(-DD), Spies 4729 (n = 25). 3028 (Matatiele): 65 km from Rhodes via
Naudesnek, (-CC), Spies 4695 (n = 20); 69 km from Rhodes, (-CC),
Spies 4701 (n = 20). 3128 (Umtata): 38 km from Maclear to Elliot,
(-AC), Spies 4712 (n = 30).
Microchloa caffra Nees: n = ± 50.
TRANSVAAL. — 2430 (Pilgrim’s Rest): 4 km from Pilgrim’s Rest to
Graskop, (-BA), Spies 5132', 25 km from Sabie to Lydenburg, (-BA),
Spies 5141. 2530 (Lydenburg): 49 km from Lydenburg to Machadodorp,
(-CB), Spies 5146.
CAPE. — 3128 (Umtata): 38 km from Maclear to Elliot, (-AC), Spies
4714.
Rendlia altera (Rendle) Chiov.: n = 20.
TRANSVAAL. — 2430 (Pilgrim’s Rest): 4 km from Pilgrim's Rest to
Graskop, (-BA), Spies 5133', 25 km from Sabie to Lydenburg. (-BA),
Spies 5142. 2530 (Lydenburg): Nederhorst turnoff on the Lydenburg-
Roossenekal road, (-AA), Spies 5129', 11 km from Dulistroom to Lyden-
burg via Frischgewaagd, (-AC), Spies 5120\ 49 km from Lydenburg to
Machadodorp, (-AD), Spies 5147.
ORANGE FREE STATE. — 2729 (Volksrust): 93 km from Harrismith
to Normandien Pass, (-DC), Spies 5072; 97 km from Harrismith to
Normandien Pass, (-DC), Spies 5077.
CAPE. — 3028 (Matatiele): 69 km from Rhodes, (-CC), Spies 4700.
3128 (Umtata): 38 km from Maclear to Elliot, (-AC), Spies 4713.
Tragus berteronianus Schult.: n = 10.
SWAZILAND. — 2631 (Mbabane): Pikiti in the Lebombo Mountains,
(-BB), Spies 2605.
CAPE. — 3026 (Aliwal North): Aliwal North, (-DA), Spies 5246.
Tragus racemosus (L.) All.: n = 10.
CAPE. — 3026 (Aliwal North): Aliwal North, (-DA), Spies 5244.
Young inflorescences were fixed in Camoy’s fixative
for 24—48 hours and the fixative was subsequently re-
placed by 70% ethanol. Anthers were squashed in 2%
aceto-carmine (Darlington & La Cour 1976) and small
aliquots of iron acetate. Slides were made permanent by
freezing them with liquid CCD (Bowen 1956), followed
by dehydration in ethanol and mounting in Euparal. Mei-
otic chromosome behaviour for each specimen, was ex-
amined during diakinesis, metaphase I, anaphase 1 and
telophase I. At least 20 cells, representative of each of
these meiotic stages, were examined per specimen.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The genus Chloris (Cynodonteae Dumort.; Chloridinae
Presl) usually has a chromosome base number of ten, oc-
casionally nine (Gibbs Russell et al. 1990). Both Chloris
gayana and C. virgata have somatic chromosome num-
bers of 20 (Figure 1A-G). We accept that the basic chro-
mosome number is ten, because that is the lowest haploid
chromsosome number observed in this study, and de-
scribed for this genus.
The chromosome numbers published, range from 2n =
20 to 40 for C. gayana and from 2n = 14 to 36 for C.
virgata , with 2n = 20 being the most frequent (Darlington
& Wylie 1955; Omduff 1967-1969; Fedorov 1969; Moore
1970, 1971, 1972, 1974, 1977; Goldblatt 1981, 1983,
1985, 1988; Goldblatt & Johnston 1990, 1991). The genus
Chloris is either diploid, as observed in this study, or poly-
ploid, with the polyploid levels ranging from triploid to
tetraploid (Spies & Jonker 1987). There were almost no
meiotic abnormalities in any of the specimens.
The Cynodon dactylon (Cynodonteae; Chloridinae)
specimens studied have haploid chromosome numbers of
9 (Figure 1H), 18 and 20. The basic chromosome number
is nine, because most published chromosome numbers are
multiples of nine. These chromosome numbers ranged
from 2n = 18 to 54 (Darlington & Wylie 1955; Malik
1967; Omduff 1967-1969; Fedorov 1969; Moore 1970-
1977; Goldblatt 1981-1988; Goldblatt & Johnston 1990.
1991). Malik (1967) described three cytological races in
this species: diploid (2n= 18 + 0- 3B), tetraploid (2n =
36 + 0 - 2B) and hexaploid (2n = 54).
A few cells of Spies 4626 were diploid and in all these
cells some extent of desynapsis occurred (Figure 1H). Just
why desynapsis should occur in the diploid cells, is not
known. Since some of the cells in this specimen contained
40 chromosomes, the specimen is regarded as a tetraploid
specimen, with four additional chromosomes. The addi-
tional chromosomes were similar in size to the euchro-
mosomes. During metaphase I these univalents lay on the
metaphase plate and showed no lagging. Since the number
of additional chromosomes varied from 0-4 per cell, we
have regarded them as B-chromosomes.
The polyploid specimens in this study form only biva-
lents and no multivalents and can, therefore, be regarded
as allopolyploids. The fact that only rod bivalents were
observed, however, indicates that only one chiasma forms
per chromosome. Multivalent formation is thus impossi-
ble, since a multivalent requires more than one chiasma
per chromosome. There were no meiotic abnormalities in
94
Bolhalia 24.1 (1994)
FIGURE 1 . — l-’holomicmgraph.s ol mciolie chromosomes in CynodoiUcac. A. Clilnns gayana, Spies .1727. n = 10. diakmesis with lOn; B. C. C.
virgata, Spies 4783, n = 10, diakinesis with 1 On; D, E, C. virgata, Spies 4799, n = 10, metaphase 1 with 1 On; F, C. virgata, Spies 4783, n = 10,
metaphase 1 with ] On; G, C. gayana. Spies 3727, n = 10, anaphase I with 10-10 segregation; H. C. dactylon, Spies 4626, n = 9, metaphase I
with 5[[8i; I. C. dactylon, Spies 4424, tetrad after meiosis II; J, K, Eustachys paspaloides, Spies 1521, n = 20, metaphase I with 20n. Scale
bar; 20 pm.
the specimens studied, except for desynapsis in the few
diploid cells observed in Spies 4626.
The genus Eustachys (Cynodonteae; Chloridinae) was
represented by Eustachys paspaloides with a haploid chro-
mosome number of 20 (Figure 1 J, K). Therefore the basic
chromosome number of ten described by Gibbs Russell
et al. (1990), is substantiated. De Wet (I960), however,
reported a specimen with 2n = 36. This could possibly be
attributed to loss aneuploidy, as these grasses are usually
tetraploid. Spies 1521 is an allopolyploid, since no mul-
tivalents were observed. Only rod bivalents were observed
and the evidence for alloploidy is, consequently, not con-
clusive. There were no meiotic abnormalities.
Harpochloa falx (Cynodonteae; Chloridinae) has hap-
loid chromosome numbers of 20, 25 and 30 (Figure 2).
The basic chromosome number is ten and ploidy levels
range from tetraploid to hexaploid. Only rod bivalents
were observed, which is an indication that only one chias-
ma forms per bivalent and, therefore, no multivalents can
be formed. Therefore, it is impossible to determine the
type of polyploidy present since the number of chiasmata
play a restricting role. Abnormalities observed included
univalents (Figure 2M), laggards (Figure 2N-P) and an
anaphase I bridge (Figure 2Q). These abnormalities oc-
curred at very low frequencies.
Rendlia altera (Cynodonteae; Chloridinae) has haploid
chromosome numbers of 18 and 20 (Figure 3A-D). The
basic chromosome number can be either nine or ten. No
other chromosome numbers were determined or pub-
lished. Loss aneuploidy from a basic chromosome number
of ten can result in a somatic chromosome number of 36,
or gain aneuploidy from a basic chromosome number of
nine can result in a somatic chromosome number of 40.
There were no meiotic abnormalities. Further studies are
Bothalia 24,1 ( 1994)
95
needed to determine the basic chromosome number and
to establish the range of polyploid levels.
Tragus (Cynodonteae; Zoysiinae) has a basic chromo-
some number of nine or ten (Gibbs Russell et al. 1990).
Tragus berteronianus has a haploid chromosome number
of 10 (Figure 3E, F).
In conclusion, this study indicates that Cynodonteae
have polyploid or agamic complexes, with the somatic
chromosome numbers ranging from diploid to hexaploid.
Two different basic chromosome numbers (i.e. 9 and 10)
are present. Further studies are needed to determine the
phylogenetic relationship between the two base numbers
and to establish the polyploid levels in each taxon.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank the National Botanical Institute for material
of Chloris virgata and Eustachys paspaloides provided
during this study. Financial support by the Foundation for
FIGURE 2. — Photomicrographs of meiotie chromosomes in Harpochlou falx. A, Spies 4695. n = 20, diakinesis with 20ii; B, Spies 5065, n = 20,
diakinesis with 19ii2i; C,Spies4712,n = 30, diakinesis with 30n; D, Spies 5128, n = 30, diakinesis with 30ii; E, Spies 5125, n = 30, metaphase
I with 30n; F, Spies 5128, n = 30, metaphase I with 30n; G, Spies 5078, n = 20, anaphase I with a 20-20 segregation: H. Spies 5128, n = 30,
anaphase I with a 30-30 segregation; I, Spies 5125, n = 30, anaphase I with a 30-30 segregation; J, Spies 5078, n = 20, anaphase I with 40
chromosomes; K, Spies 5078, n = 20, anaphase I with a 20-20 segregation; L, Spies 4695, n = 20, metaphase I with desynapsis; M, Spies
4729, n = 25, metaphase I with a B-chromosome in each pole; N, Spies 4695, n = 20, anaphase I with two laggards; O, Spies 4712 , n = 30,
anaphase I with laggards; P, Spies 4695, n = 20, anaphase I bridge; Q, Spies 4712, n = 30, anaphase I bridge. Scale bar; 20 pm.
96
Bolhalia 24.1 (1994)
FIGURE 3. — Photomicrographs of meiolic chromosomes in Rendlia ahem and Tragus beneronianus. A-D. K. ahem: A, Spies 5077. n = 20,
diakinesis with 20ii; B. Spies 5077, n = 20, metaphase I; C, Spies 5072, n = 20, metaphase I with 20n; D, Spies 5077, n = 20, anaphase I
with a 20-20 segregation. E, F, T. berteronicinus, Spies 2605, n = 10, diakinesis with 10n. Scale bar = 20 pm.
Research and Development and the University of the Or-
ange Free State is gratefully acknowledged.
REFERENCES
BOWEN. C.C. 1956. Freezing by liquid carbon dioxide in making slides
permanent. Stain Technology 3 1 : 87-90.
CLAYTON, W.D. & RENVOIZE, S.A. 1986. Genera graminum. Kew
Bulletin Additional Series XIII: 1-389.
DARLINGTON, C.D. & LA COUR, L.F. 1976. The handling of chromo-
somes. Allen & Unwin, London.
DARLINGTON, C.D. & WYLIE, A.P. 1955. Chromosome atlas of flow-
ering plants. Allen & Unwin, London.
DE WET, J.M.J. 1960. Chromosome numbers and some morphological
attributes of various South African grasses. American Journal of
Botany 47: 44-50.
FEDOROV, A. A. 1969. Chromosome numbers of flowering plants. Acad-
emy of Science, Leningrad.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., WATSON, L„ KOEKEMOER, M„ SMOOK,
L„ BARKER, N.P., ANDERSON, H.M. & DALLWITZ, M.J.
1990. Grasses of southern Africa. Memoirs of the Botanical Sur-
vey of South Africa No. 58.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1981. Index to plant chromosome numbers. Mono-
grams of Systematic Botany 5.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1983. Index to plant chromosome numbers. Mono-
grams of Systematic Botany 8.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1985. Index to plant chromosome numbers. Mono-
grams of Systematic Botany 13.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1988. Index to plant chromosome numbers. Mono-
grams of Systematic Botany 23.
GOLDBLATT. P. & JOHNSON, D.E. 1990. Index to plant chromosome
numbers. Monograms of Systematic Botany 30.
GOLDBLATT, P. & JOHNSON, D.E. 1991. Index to plant chromosome
numbers. Monograms of Systematic Botany 40.
MALIK, C.P. 1967. Polyploidy in Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. Chromo-
somal Information Service Tokyo 1: 6,1 .
MOORE, R.J. 1970. Index to plant chromosome numbers. Regnum Veg-
etable 68.
MOORE, R.J. 1971. Index to plant chromosome numbers. Regnum Veg-
etable 77.
MOORE, R.J. 1972. Index to plant chromosome numbers. Regnum Veg-
etable 84.
MOORE, R.J. 1974. Index to plant chromosome numbers. Regnum Veg-
etable 91.
MOORE, R.J. 1977. Index to plant chromosome numbers. Regnum Veg-
etable 96.
ORNDUFF, R. 1967. Index to plant chromosome numbers. Regnum
Vegetable 50.
ORNDUFF, R. 1968. Index to plant chromosome numbers. Regnum
Vegetable 55.
ORNDUFF, R. 1969. Index to plant chromosome numbers. Regnum
Vegetable 59.
SPIES, J.J. & JONKER, A. 1987. Chromosome studies on African plants.
4. Bothalia 17: 135, 136.
A. STRYDOM* and J.J. SPIES*t
* Department of Botany and Genetics, University of the Orange Free
State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300.
t Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
MS. received: 1992-12-14.
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
97
PTERIDOPHYTA
SYSTEMATIC STUDIES IN THE GENUS MOHRIA (ANEMIACEAE). V, KARYOLOGY
Mohria Sw. Actinostachys Wall., Anemia Sw., Lygod-
ium Sw. and Schizaea J. Smith constitute the schizaeoid
ferns. They are commonly placed in a single family, the
Schizaeaceae (Engl. & Prantl 1898-1902; Bower 1923;
Christensen 1938; Copeland 1947; Tryon & Tryon 1982;
Tryon & Lugardon 1991) because of their sporangium
morphology. The 'schizaeaceous' sporangium type, how-
ever, appears to be polyphyletic (Mickel 1974) and the
morphological differences between these genera are sig-
nificant. The subdivision of this assemblage into distinct
families, the Anemiaceae (Anemia and Mohria), Lygo-
diaceae (Lygodium) and the Schizaeaceae (Actinostachys
and Schizaea) has therefore recently gained wider accep-
tance (Nayar 1970; Bierhorst 1971: Love et al. 1977; Clif-
ford & Constantine 1980; De la Sota & Morbelli 1987).
Anemia and Mohria are dissimilar in frond morphology
but are evidently related in view of similarities in their
anatomy (Prantl 1881; Bower 1918; Roux et al. 1992),
trichomes (Mickel 1962; Roux 1992a) and spores (Nayar
1968; Roux 1992b). The similarity in their chromosome
numbers also supports this view.
The chromosome numbers of the genera also endorse
the proposed subdivision:
Anemiaceae
Anemia : n = 38 (Mickel 1962; Lovis 1977); n = 76, 114 (Mickel 1982).
Mohria : n = 38 (Mickel 1962; Lovis 1977)
Lygodiaceae
Lygodium'. 2n = 56 (Roy & Manton 1965); 2n = 58 (Manton & Sledge
1954; Roy & Manton 1965); 2n = 60 (Wagner 1963; Manton & Sledge
1954); 2n = 112 (Roy & Manton 1965); 2n = 116 (Manton & Sledge
1954); 2n = 120 (Roy & Manton 1965).
Schizaeaceae
Actinostachys: 2n = 280 (Mitui 1973); n = 325 ± 30 (Lovis in Holttum
1959); 2n = ± 1120 (Abraham et al. 1962).
Schiwea: 2n = ± 144 (Araujo in Love 1976); 2n = 154 (Lovis 1958);
2n = ± 188 (Brownlie 1965); 2n = ± 540 (Brownlie 1965).
Prior to this study, the chromosome number of only
one of the seven species of Mohria currently recognised
had been known (Lovis & Roy 1964). Chromosome num-
bers have now been determined for all the species except
for M. lepigera (Baker) Baker, for which no live material
was available.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Live plants were collected and cultivated at the Na-
tional Botanical Garden, Kirstenbosch. Cytological inves-
tigations were made either on root tip mitosis, or meiosis
in spore mother cells. A minimum of three cells per spec-
imen were examined. Actively growing material was col-
lected and placed in a saturated solution of 1-bro-
monaphtalene for 12 hours at ± + 4°C. The roots were
then washed and transferred to 3:1 absolute ethanokglacial
acetic acid, and stored for 12 hours at — 4°C. Hydrolysis
was done using 5N HC1 for 10-12 minutes at room tem-
perature. The roots were then washed and squashed in
aceto-orcein. Photographs were taken on a Zeiss
‘Axoscop' photomicroscope using Ilford PanL film, using
phase contrast and magnifications of x 1600. Voucher
specimens are deposited in the Compton Herbarium
(NBG).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Lor each species, every plant that has been investigated
is cited with its locality. Counts obtained from root tip
mitosis are given as 2n numbers and those obtained from
spore mother cells as an n number.
Mohria cajfrorum (L.) Desv.: 2n = 76 (figure 4A)
CAPE. — 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): summit of Gifberg, (-DD), Roux
2014: summit of Matsikamma, (-DD). Rota 2015. 3318 (Cape Town):
Malmesbury, (-BC), Duncan s.n.; western slope of Tierberg, (-DC), Roux
2005. 3319 (Worcester): summit of Gydo Pass, (-AA). Roux 2022. 3325
(Port Elizabeth): The Meadows, Elands River, (-CA), Yates 30.
Mohria marginalis (Sav.) J.P. Roux: 2n = 76 (figure 4B)
O.F.S. — 2828 (Bethlehem): Qwa Qwa, road to the Sentinel, (-DB),
Roux 907.
Mohria nudiuscula J.P. Roux: 2n = 152
NATAL. — 3029 (Kokstad): Weza, Ingeli Forest, (-DB), Roux 2329.
Mohria rigida J.P. Roux: 2n = 152 (figure 4C)
NATAL. — 3029 (Kokstad): Weza. Ingeli Forest, (-DB), Roux 2331.
Mohria sa.xatilis J.P. Roux: n = 76 (figure 5A)
CAPE. — 3219 (Wuppertal): road to Heuningvlei, (-AA), Roux 2000.
Mohria vestita Baker: 2n = 152 (figure 5B)
TRANSVAAL. — 2730 (Vryheid): 6 km from turnoff to Liineburg,
(-AD), Roux 2264. 2265.
LESOTHO. — 3027 (Lady Grey): Lebelonyane Pass. (-BB), Roux
2224.
CAPE. — 3126 (Queenstown): Hangklip, (-DD), Steiner s.n.
Lovis & Roy (1964) reported a chromosome number
of 2n = 152 for what they believed to be M. cajfrorum.
M. cajfrorum, however, is restricted to the Cape Province.
It is suggested that their material which was obtained from
Woodbush in the Transvaal is M. vestita, a species com-
mon in that area.
Although metacentric and submetacentric chromo-
somes are present most chromosomes appear to be of the
acrocentric type.
CONCLUSIONS
The chromosome numbers reported here confirm the
closer affinity of Mohria with Anemia than with any of
the other schizaeoid genera. Two karyotypes, 2n = 76 and
2n = 152, are known in Mohria whereas in Anemia apoga-
mous triploids and hexaploids have also been reported
(Mickel 1962). The base number of x = 38 for Mohria
and Anemia, accepted here is in conflict with that of Love
et al. (1977) who claim it to be x = 19.
98
Bothalia 24.1 (1994)
Aneuploidy occurs in Lygodiaceae and Schizaeaceae
but is not known in the Anemiaceae.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I wish to express my thanks to Jeanette Loedolff for
printing the photographs.
REFERENCES
ABRAHAM, A., NINAN, C.A. & MATHEW. P.M. 1962. Studies on the
cytology and phylogeny of the pteridophytes. VU. Observations
of one hundred species of south Indian ferns. Journal of the Indian
Botanical Society 4 1 : 339—42 1 .
ARAUJO. I. DE J. DA SILVA 1976. In A. Love, IOPB chromosome
number reports. LII. Taxon 25: 483.
.Afl
I Kit Kl 1. Root tip miiosis in Molina species. A. M. cajjromni,
Duncan s.n. . showing 76 chromosomes; B, M. marginalia, Roux
907, showing 76 chromosomes; C, M. rigida, Roux 2331, show-
ing 1 52 chromosomes.
I 1GI KL 5. --Meiolic and somatic chromosomes in Moliria species. A.
spore mother cell meiosis in M. saxatilis, Roux 2000, showing
76 bivalents; B. root tip mitosis in M. vestita, Steiner s.n.,
showing 152 chromosomes.
BIERHORST, D.W. 1971. Morphology of the vascular plants. Macmil-
lan, New York.
BOWER, F.O. 1918. Studies in the phylogeny of the Filicales. VII. the
Pteroideae. Annals of Botany 32: 1-68.
BOWER, F.O. 1923. The ferns (Filicales). Vol. 1. University Press,
Cambridge.
BROWNLIE, G. 1965. Chromosome numbers in some Pacific Pteri-
dophyta. Pacific Science 19: 493—497.
COPELAND. E.B. 1947. Genera filicwn. Waltham, Massachusetts.
CHRISTENSEN, C.F.A. 1938. Filicinae. In F. Verdoom, Manual of
Pteridology. Nijhoff, The Hague.
CLIFFORD, H.T. & CONSTANTINE, J. 1980. Ferns, fern allies and
conifers of Australia. University of Queensland Press. St Lucia.
DE LA SOTA, E.R. & MORBELLI, M.A. 1987. Schizaeales. Phy-
tomorphology 37: 365-393.
LNGLER, A. & PRANTL. K. 1898-1902. Die naturlichen Pflanzen-
familien 1,4. Engelmann, Leipzig.
LOVE, A., LOVE, D. & PICH1 SERMOLLI, R.E.G. 1977. Cytotaxon-
omical atlas of the Pteridophyta. Cramer, Vaduz.
LOVIS. J.D. 1958. A chromosome count in Schizaea. Nature 181: 1085.
I.OVIS. J.D. 1977. Evolutionary patterns and processes in ferns. Ad-
vances in Botanical Research 4: 229-430.
LOVIS, J.D. 1959. In R.E. Holttum, Pteridophyta 1,1: 39. Flora Malesi-
ana, Ser. 2. Noordhoff, Groningen.
LOVIS, J.D. & ROY. S.K. 1964. A chromosome count in Moliria. Nature
201: 1348.
M ANTON, I. & SLEDGE, W.A. 1954. Observations on the cytology and
taxonomy of the pteridophyte flora of Ceylon. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society, London, B, 238: 127-185.
MICKEL, I T. 1962. A monographic study of the genus Anemia, subge-
nus Coptophylhun. Iowa State Journal of Science 36: 349—482.
MICKEL. J.T. 1974. Phyletic lines in the modern ferns. Annals of the
Missouri Botanical Garden 61: 474—482.
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
99
MICKEL, J.T. 1982. The genus Anemia (Schizaeaceae) in Mexico.
Brittonia 34: 388-413.
MITUI, K. 1973. A cytological survey of the pteridophytes of the Bonin
Islands. Journal of Japanese Botany 48: 247-253.
NAYAR, B.K. 1968. A comparative study of the spore morphology of
Ceratopteris, Anemia and Mohria, and its bearing on the relation-
ships of the Parkeriaceae. Journal of the Indian Botanical Society
47: 246-256.
NAYAR, B.K. 1970. A phylogenetic classification of the homosporous
ferns. Taxon 19: 229-236.
PRANTL, K. 1881. Untersuchungen zur Morphologie der Gefasskrypto-
gamen. Die Schizaeaceen. Engelmann, Leipzig.
ROUX, J.P., VAN DER WALT, J.J.A. & VAN DER MERWE. R.B. 1992.
Systematic studies in the genus Mohria (Anemiaceae: Pterido-
phyta). I. Comparative morphology and anatomy of the rhizome
and frond. South African Journal of Botany 58: 83-89.
ROUX, J.P. 1992a. Systematic studies in the genus Mohria (Anemiaceae:
Pteridophyta). II. Comparative vestiture morphology and phytog-
eny. South African Journal of Botany 58: 215-219.
ROUX, J.P. 1992b. Systematic studies in the genus Mohria (Anemiaceae:
Pteridophyta). III. Comparative sporangium and spore morphol-
ogy. Bothalia 22: 199-204.
ROY, S.K. & MANTON, I. 1965. A new base number in the genus
Lygodium. New Phytologist 64: 286-292.
TRYON, A.F. & LUGARDON, B. 1991. Spores of the Pteridophyta.
SpringerVerlag, New York.
TRYON, R.M. & TRYON, A.F. 1982. Ferns and allied plants with
special reference to tropical America. SpringerVerlag, New York.
WAGNER, W.H. 1963. Pteridophyta of the Mountain lake area, Giles
Co.. Va., including notes from White-top Mountain. Castanea 28:
113-140.
J.P. ROUX*
* Compton Herbarium. National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X7,
Claremont, Cape Town 7735.
MS. received: 1993-05-14.
Bothalia 24,1: 101-105 (1994)
Embryo sac development in some representatives of the tribe Cynodonteae
(Poaceae)
A. STRYDOM* and J.J. SPIES*f
Keywords: apomixis, apospory, Chloridoideae, Cynodonteae, embryo sac development, Poaceae
ABSTRACT
Chloris virgata Sw., Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.. Harpochloa falx (L. f.) Kuntze, and Tragus berteronianus Schult. have a
Polygonum type of embryo sac development. Unreduced embryo sacs were found in Eustachys paspaloides (Vahl) Lanza &
Mattel, Harpochloa falx , and Rendlia altera (Rendle) Chiov. Both facultative and obligate apomixis were observed. The
Hieracium type of embryo sac development was observed in the aposporic specimens.
UITTREKSEL
Die Polygonum- tipe kiemsak-ontwikkeling, is by Chloris virgata Sw., Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers., Harpochloa falx (L. f.)
Kuntze en Tragus berteronianus Schult. waargeneem. Ongereduseerde kiemsakke is by Eustachys paspaloides (Vahl) Lanza &
Mattel, Harpochloa falx en Rendlia altera (Rendle) Chiov. aangetref. Beide fakultatiewe en obligate apomiksie het voorgekom.
Hieracium- tipe kiemsakontwikkeling is by aposporiese eksemplare waargeneem.
INTRODUCTION
The subfamily Chloridoideae Rouy is divided into sev-
eral tribes. All the species included in this study belong
to the tribe Cynodonteae Dumort. The chloridoid grasses
that originated in Gondwanaland (Jacobs 1987), are pre-
dominantly species of arid and semi-arid areas, where
their photosynthetic systems and associated anatomical
and morphological adaptations appear to give them com-
petitive advantages (Jacobs 1987). The Cynodonteae com-
prises annual and perennial grasses that provide good
grazing for domestic and wild animals. In addition, they
play an important role in erosion control, and their pres-
ence gives an indication of the kind of management main-
tained (Van Oudtshoom 1991).
Cultivation and selection of the better adapted cultivars
of these grasses may increase their grazing potential. Stud-
ies of their mode of reproduction can increase our knowl-
edge and enhance their improvement. The type of repro-
duction, asexual or sexual, can be established through a
study of embryo sac development. Different types of em-
bryo sac development occur in different species. Diploid
to tetraploid species usually reproduce sexually, whereas
apomixis occurs at tetraploid and higher polyploid levels
(Stebbins 1972). Facultative apomixis, where apomixis
and sexual reproduction co-exist, occurs in most apomictic
grasses. Species that reproduce sexually have theoretically
a wider variability and a better chance of survival. In con-
trast, obligate apomicts have a limited variability which
can only be improved by mutation.
The aim of the study was to determine how these grass-
es reproduce, whether sexually or apomictically, by estab-
* Department of Botany and Genetics, University of the Orange Free
State, RO. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300.
f Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
MS. received: 1992-08-03.
lishing the types of embryo sacs that occur in the Cyno-
donteae.
Unlike Mogie (1992) we used the following definitions
for the purpose of this study: reduced embryo sacs (em-
bryo sacs in which meiosis occurs) imply sexual repro-
duction, whereas unreduced embryo sacs imply asexual
(or apomictic) reproduction. Sexual reproduction is the
result of double fertilization, where the offspring contain
genetic material from both parents. Asexual reproduction
may include single fertilization (pseudogamous fertiliza-
tion), where the pollen donor does not contribute to the
genetic composition of the offspring. With these stricter
definitions of sexual and asexual reproduction, the double
fertilization of unreduced embryo sacs, resulting in poly-
ploid lineages (Harlan & De Wet 1975; Lewis 1980), is
excluded. We believe that it is justifiable to exclude these
specific cases since no such lineages have been observed
in any of the species studied (Strydom & Spies 1994).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Voucher specimens are housed in the Geo Potts Her-
barium, Department of Botany and Genetics, University
of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein (BLFU) or the
National Herbarium, Pretoria (PRE).
Inflorescences at different stages of development were
collected and fixed in the field in Carnoy’s fixative.
Ovules were dissected from the inflorescences in 70%
ethanol, serially dehydrated in ethanol and tertiary bu-
thanol and embedded in a synthetic wax. Serial longitu-
dinal sections (7 Jim) of the ovules of all the species,
except Harpochloa falx and Rendlia altera were obtained
by using conventional methods. The inflorescences of the
last-mentioned species were sectioned transversely. Sec-
tions were stained in safranin and fast green according to
the technique used by Spies & Du Plessis (1986) and
102
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
mounted in Eukitt. At least 20 embryo sacs at various
developmental stages were studied per specimen.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
Chloris virgata
ORANGE FREE STATE. — 2827 (Senekal): 6 km from Clocolan to
Peka bridge, (-DC), Spies 4799. 2926 (Bloemfontein): 26 km from
Dewetsdorp to Hobhouse, (-DB ), Spies 4783.
Cynodon dactylon
CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): on top of Bothmaskloof, (-BD), Spies
4424. 3420 (Bredasdorp): De Hoop Nature Reserve, (-DC), Spies 4626.
Eustachys paspaloides
TRANSVAAL. — 2530 (Lydenburg): 10 km from Boshoek to
Buffelsvlei, (-AC), Spies 1521.
Ha rpochl oa falx
TRANSVAAL. — 2530 (Lydenburg): 11 km from Dullstroom to
Lydenburg via Frischgewaagd, (-AC), Spies 5118\ 16 km from Dull-
stroom to Lydenburg via Frischgewaagd, (-AC), Spies 5125 ; 5 km from
Belfast to Dullstroom, (-CA), Spies 5113.
ORANGE FREE STATE.— 2827 (Senekal): 6 km from Nebo to
Fouriesburg via Generaalsnek, (-DB), Spies 4827. 2729 (Volksrust): 53
km from Harrismith to Newcastle via Normandien Pass, (-DC), Spies
5063 ; 92 km from Harrismith to Normandien, (-DC), Spies 5065 ; 97
km from Harrismith to Normandien, (-DC), Spies 5078.
CAPE. — 3027 (Lady Grey): 52 km from Rhodes via Lundeansnek,
(-DD), Spies 4729. 3028 (Matatiele): 65 km from Rhodes to Maclear,
(-CC), Spies 4695. 3128 (Umtata): 38 km from Maclear to Elliot, (-AC),
Spies 4712.
Rendlia altera
TRANSVAAL. — 2530 (Lydenburg): Nederhorst turnoff on the
Lydenburg-Roossenekal road, (-AA), Spies 5129.
ORANGE FREE STATE.— 2729 (Volksrust): 93 km from Harrismith
to Normandien, (-DC), Spies 5072\ 97 km from Harrismith to
Normandien, (-DC), Spies 5077.
CAPE. — 3128 (Umtata): 38 km from Maclear to Elliot, (-AC), Spies
4713.
Tragus berteronianus
ORANGE FREE STATE. — 2827 (Senekal): 6 km from Clocolan to
Peka bridge, (-DC), Spies 4803.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The Cynodonteae ovule consists of the nucellus, inte-
guments (Figure 1 A), chalaza, raphe, and funicle. The nu-
cellus is enveloped by two integuments. They grow
beyond the nucellus and arch over its apex forming the
micropyle. Both Harpochloa falx and Rendlia altera have
ovules that are amphitropous, whereas the other species
studied have anatropous ovules.
The female gametophyte develops from the archespo-
rium formed in the nucellar tissue of the ovule (Figure
1A). The archesporium divides meiotically, to form a lin-
ear tetrad of macrospores, of which only the chalazal one
is functional. This macrospore enlarges and after three mi-
totic divisions (Figure 1B-F) a small coenocyte differen-
tiates. After cytokinesis the macrogametophyte consists of
an egg cell, two synergids, the central cell with two polar
nuclei, and three antipodal cells (Figure IG-J). Therefore,
up to this stage, embryo sac development conforms to the
Polygonum type. The egg cell and the two synergids show
a triangular arrangement. The largest portion of the em-
bryo sac is occupied by the central cell with the two polar
nuclei. Usually, the antipodal cells are the smallest cells
of the embryo sac. However, the antipodal cells of the
Cynodonteae often undergo numerous divisions, which re-
sult in the formation of a mass of antipodal cells or an
antipodal complex (Figure IK, L) in the mature embryo
sac. This phenomenon was also observed in other grasses
(Willemse & Van Went 1984).
The specimens of Chloris virgata had reduced embryo
sacs, and antipodal complexes were present (Table 1 ; Fig-
ure IB, D, K). The reduced embryo sacs of the specimens
of Cynodon dactylon had no antipodal complexes (Table
1 ). Some specimens of Harpochloa falx had reduced em-
bryo sacs with the egg cell, the polar cells, and two syn-
ergids clearly visible in most of the embryo sacs (Figure
1A, C, E, G-J). Antipodal complexes were present in
some of these embryo sacs (Table 1; Figure 1L). The em-
bryo sacs of Tragus berteronianus were reduced (Table
1).
The specimens of Eustachys paspaloides , Harpochloa
falx and Rendlia altera had unreduced embryo sacs (Table
1; Figure 2A-E). Apomixis means asexual (agamic) re-
production by seed, that is, agamospermy (Nogler 1984).
There are two kinds of apomicts, namely, obligate apo-
micts, which have a completely closed recombination sys-
tem and heterozygotic genotypes which are preserved at
the cost of evolutionary flexibility, and facultative apo-
micts, where unreduced and reduced modes of reproduc-
tion coexist (Mogie 1992). Apomixis leads to maternal
offspring which are normally genetically exact copies of
the mother plant (Nogler 1984).
Eustachys paspaloides and Harpochloa falx were fac-
ultative apomicts with both reduced and unreduced em-
bryo sacs. In most cases the reduced embryo sacs degene-
rate eventually. Rendlia altera was obligate apomictic be-
cause all reduced embryo sacs degenerated at an early
stage. The embryo sacs of these species were aposporous.
There are two types of aposporous embryo sacs, the
Hieracium type, a bipolar, eight-nucleate embryo sac, and
the Panicum type, a monopolar, four-nucleate embryo sac
(Nogler 1984). The specimens of Eustachys paspaloides.
TABLE 1. — Type of embryo sac development in some representatives of
the tribe Cynodonteae (chromosome numbers from Strydom &
Spies 1994)
Bothalia 24. 1 (1994)
103
FIGURE 1 . — Photomicrographs of reduced embryo sac development in Cynodonteae. A, archesporium in Harpocliloajcilx, Spies
4729; B. binucleate embryo sac in Chloris virgata , Spies 4783', C, binucleate embryo sac in H. falx. Spies 5078', D.
tetranucleate embryo sac in C. virgata with only three nuclei visible in section, Spies 4783\ E, tetranucleate embryo sac
in H. falx with only three nuclei visible. Spies 5125; F, tetranucleate embryo sac of Eustachys paspaloides. Spies 1521,
with only two nuclei visible; G, two synergids in H. falx. Spies 4827; H, I, egg cell and synergids of H.falx, Spies 5113;
J, two polar nuclei in H. falx. Spies 4827; K, antipodal complex with only three antipodal cells visible in this section of
C. virgata. Spies 4799; L, antipodal complex with only three antipodal cells visible in this section of H. falx. Spies 5118.
a, archesporium; ac, antipodal complex; e, egg cell; i, integument; k, nucleus; n, nucellus; p, polar nucleus; s, synergid.
Scale bar; 80 pm.
104
Bothalia 24.1 ( 1094)
FIGURE 2. — Photomicrographs of unreduced embryo sac development in Cynodonleae. A, reduced and unreduced embryo sacs in Rendiui altera ,
Spies 5129 ; a degenerating macrospore can be seen next to a reduced one; B. two developing unreduced embryo sacs in Harpochloa falx.
Spies 4695\ C, three unreduced embryo sacs in R. altera. Spies 5072, two with one nucleus and one with two nuclei; D, five unreduced
embryo sacs in R. altera. Spies 5129, each with one nucleus; E, two unreduced embryo sacs in Eustachys paspaloides, Spies 1521 , each with
one nucleus, a, unreduced embryo sac; d, degenerating embryo sac; s, reduced embryo sac. Scale bar: 80 pm.
Harpochloa falx , and Rencllia altera had bipolar embryo
sacs, therefore the Hieracium type. Antipodal complexes
were absent in Eustachys paspaloicles and Rencllia altera.
The ovules of Eustachys paspaloides contained reduced
embryo sacs with the synergids or the egg cell visible,
whereas other ovules had up to two or three different em-
bryo sacs each (Figure 2E). One specimen of Harpochloa
falx had two different embryo sacs (Figure 2B). The
ovules of Rencllia altera had up to five different embryo
sacs per ovule (Figure 2A, C, D).
In conclusion, the grasses of Cynodonteae reproduce
both sexually and apomictically. Reduced embryo sacs of
the Polygonum type occur. The apomicts have unreduced
bipolar Hieracium type embryo sacs. Sexual reproduction
occurs at different polyploid levels as seen in Harpochloa
falx and Rencllia altera. Some species have reduced em-
bryo sacs at the letraploid and higher polyploid levels
( Harpochloa falx), whereas others have unreduced em-
bryo sacs at these polyploid levels (Rencllia altera) (Stry-
dom & Spies 1994). Eustachys paspaloides and Har-
pochloa falx were both facultative apomicts and Rencllia
altera was an obligate apomict. The types of ovules differ
as seen in Harpochloa falx and Rencllia altera. Both have
amphitropous ovules, whereas the other species have ana-
tropous ovules.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Mrs E.J.L. Saayman for providing some of
the material used during this study. We are indebted to
the University of the Orange Free State and the Founda-
tion for Research Development for facilities and financial
support during this study.
REFERENCES
HARLAN, J.R. & DE WET, J.M.J. 1975. On O. Winge and a prayer: the
origins ol polyploidy. Botanical Review 4 1 : 36 1-390.
JACOBS, S.W.L. 1987. Systematics of the Chloridoid grasses. In T.R.
Soderstrom, Grass systematics and evolution : 277-286. International
Grass Symposium.
LEWIS, W.H. (ed.) 1980. Polyploidy: biological relevance. Plenum Press,
New York.
MOGIE, M. 1992. The evolution of asexual reproduction In plants. Chapman
& Hall, London.
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
105
NOGLER, G.A. 1 984. Gametophytic apomixis. In B.M. Johri, Embryology of
angiospenns : 475-510. Springer- Verlag, Berlin.
SPIES, J.J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1986. The genus Rubus in South Africa III.
The occurrence of apomixis and sexuality. South African Journal of
Botany 52: 226-232.
STEBBINS, G.L. 1972. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. Edward
Arnold, London.
STRYDOM, A. & SPIES. J.J. 1 994. Acytotaxonomic study of some represen-
tatives of the tribe Cynodonteae (Chloridoideae, Poaceae). Bothalia
24: 92-96.
VAN OUDTSHOORN. F.P. 1991. Gids tot grasse van Suicl-Afrika. Briza
Publikasies.
WILLEMSE, M.T.M. & VAN WENT. J.L. 1 984. The female gametophyte. In
B.M. Johri, Embryology of angiospenns: 159-191. Springer- Verlag,
Berlin.
,
.
Bothalia 24,1 : 107-110(1994)
Breeding systems in some representatives of the genus Lycium (Solanaceae)
L. MINNE*, J.J. SPIES*1\ H.J.T. VENTER* and A.M. VENTER*
ABSTRACT
The development of the ovule and the embryo sac of five of the 17 species of Lycium and of one hybrid, recorded for
southern Africa, was investigated. All specimens of four of the species and the hybrid (between a hermaphroditic and a
functionally dioecious species) were found to be functionally dioecious: they express only one sex, although both male and
female organs are present in the same flower. One species was hermaphroditic. The embryo sacs of all species, and of the hybrid,
were of the normal eight-nucleate Polygonum type. The structure of the ovary and the development of the embryo sac are similar
to those of L. europaeum L. The absence of unreduced embryo sacs indicates that apomixis does not occur at any ploidy level
in the species studied.
UITTREKSEL
Die ontwikkeling van die saadknop en die embriosak van vyf van die 17 Lycium-spesies en van een baster wat in suidelike
Afrika aangeteken is, is ondersoek. Daar is bevind dat alle eksemplare van vier van die spesies en die baster (tussen 'n
hermafroditiese en 'n funksioneel tweehuisige spesie) funksioneel tweehuisig is: hulle gee uitdrukking aan slegs een geslag,
hoewel manlike en vroulike organe albei in dieselfde blom teenwoordig is. Een spesie was hermafrodities. Die embriosakke van
al die spesies, en van die baster, was van die normale agt-kernige Polygonum- tipe. Die bou van die vrugbeginsel en die
ontwikkeling van die embriosak is soortgelyk aan die van L. europaeum L. Die afwesigheid van ongereduseerde embriosakke
dui daarop dat apomiksie nie by enige plo'idievlak by die spesies wat ondersoek is, voorkom nie.
INTRODUCTION
The genus Lycium (Solanaceae) consists of small to
large shrubs with a wide distribution in arid to subarid,
temperate to subtropical regions of the world (Joubert
1981; Bemardello 1982). The only exceptions, which are
more treelike, are L. afrum L. and L. horridum Thunb. (=
L. austrinum Miers) (Palmer & Pitman 1973). Seventeen
Lycium species are known in southern Africa, whereas
50-60 species are found in the western hemisphere
(Joubert 1981).
Polyploidy occurs in the genus Lycium (Minne 1992;
Spies et al. 1993). As polyploidy and apomixis are often
associated (Stebbins 1971), the aim of this research was
to determine whether apomixis occurs in the polyploid
specimens. The mode of development of the ovule and
the type of embryo sac present in L. afrum , L. arenicolum ,
L. horridum and L. tetrandrum was therefore studied.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The material used during this study was collected and
fixed in the field. Voucher specimens are housed in the
Geo Potts Herbarium, Bloemfontein (BLFU).
Specimens examined [haploid chromosome numbers
from Minne (1992) and/or Spies et al. (1993)]
L. afrum n = 12
CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): Bokbaai, (-CB), A. Venter 346, 348:
Melkbosstrand, R27 road, (-CD), A. Venter 353: Melkbosstrand, Otto du
Plessis Ave., 50 m north of Dutch Reformed Church on road shoulder,
(-CD), A Venter 371. 373.
* Department of Botany and Genetics, University of the Orange Free
State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300.
t Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
MS. received 1992-07-13.
L. afrum x L. ferocissimum n = 12
CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): Melkbosstrand, R27 road, (-CD), A.
Venter 352, 355; Melkbosstrand, Otto du Plessis Ave., 50 m north of
Dutch Reformed Church on road shoulder, (-CD), A. Venter 372.
L. arenicolum n = 36
CAPE. — 2824 (Kimberley): on Barkly West road, 6 km from the
Windsorton turnoff to Riverton, (-DA). A. Venter 361: Kimberley Dist.,
Maidavale, on Nooitgedacht road, (-DB), Joubert 339-343.
ORANGE FREE STATE. — 2825 (Boshof): Modder River bridge on
Petrusburg-Kimberley road, (-CD), Joubert 324. 325: Flamink Pan, 5.5
km west of Modder River bridge on Petrusburg-Kimberley road, (-CD),
Joubert 329, 330. 2926 (Bloemfontein): Bloemfontein, University of the
Orange Free State Campus, (-AA), Spies 5173.
L. horridum n = 24
CAPE. — 2824 (Kimberley): Maidavale, Kimberley Dist. on
Nooigedacht road, (-DB), Joubert 338: A. Venter 384. 3119 (Calvinia):
17 km outside Calvinia on the way to Williston (R27) at the R354 turnoff
to Middelpos and Sutherland, (-BD), A. Venter 384. 3123 (Victoria West):
7.2 km from Richmond on N1 to Beaufort West, (-BD), A. Venter 366:
13.7 km from Richmond on N1 to Beaufort West, (-BD), A. Venter 368.
3220 (Sutherland): 25 km north of Sutherland, (-BC), Jouben 333. 334.
3224 (Graaff-Reinet): 102 km from Uitenhage to Graaff-Reinet, (-DC),
Spies 5234.
ORANGE FREE STATE. — 2825 (Boshof): 1 km east of Modder
River bridge on Petrusburg-Kimberley road, (-CD), H. Venter 9232. 2925
(Jagersfontein): 36 km from Petrusburg to Kimberley, (-AB), H. Venter
9230. 9231.
L. tetrandrum n = 36
CAPE. — 3218 (Clanwilliam): Lambertsbaai beach, (-AB), Spies
5001, 5002. 3318 (Cape Town): just outside Yzerfontein on R315 road
shoulder, (-AC), A. Venter 376: in Yzerfontein on vacant lot, (-AC), A.
Venter 377: Bokbaai vicinity, (-CB), A. Venter 347: Ganzekraal, (-CB),
A. Venter 350, 351. 3420 (Bredasdorp): 53 km from Bredasdorp to
Swellendam, (-CA), Spies 5055.
L. villosum n = 24
CAPE. — 2824 (Kimberley): 24.7 km to Barkly West from the Kim-
berley-Griekwastad turnoff, (-DA), Jouben 312, 313: at the Nooitgedacht
turnoff on the Kimberley-Riverton road, (-DA), A. Venter 388, 389: 6.5
I OR
Bothalia 24.1 ( 1004)
FIGURE I . — Longitudinal sections through anthers and ovaries oi functionally male and female specimens of Lycium. A, B, L. arenicolum ,
Joubert 340, pollen in the functionally male plant; C, D, L. tetrandrum. Spies 5001, pollen in the functionally female plant. Scale
bar: A, C, 136 pm; B, D, 34 pm.
km past the Nooitgedacht turnoff on the Kimberley-Barkly West road,
( — DA), A. Venter 357; 7 km past the Nooitgedacht turnoff on the Kim-
berley-Barkly West road, (-DA), A. Venter 358; 8 km from the turnoff
to Riverton on the Kimberley-Windsorton road, (-DA), A. Venter 362,
363.
The ovules and anthers of flowers of varying ages were
fixed in Camoy’s fixative in the field. The fixative was
replaced after 24-48 hours by 70% ethanol. Dehydration
was done in ethanol and tertiary butanol after which the
flowers were embedded in pastulated synthetic paraffin
wax, sectioned at 5-7 mm and stained with Safranin and
Fast Green as described by Spies & Du Plessis (1986).
At least twenty embryo sacs were studied per specimen.
For the scanning electron microscope (SEM) study,
flowers were dissected in order to expose the stamens,
ovaries and pistils of the specimens. The dissected flowers
were mounted on aluminium stubs with the aid of a fast
setting glue. The mounted material was then covered with
carbon gold (Spurr 1 969) for 1 35 seconds in the Bio Rad
SEM coating system. The structure of the pistil, stamen,
and pollen of both sexes of the dioecious species were
studied with a Jeol Winsem JSM-6400 scanning electron
microscope.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A study of a large number of specimens of Lycium in
southern African herbaria, Kew (K), British Museum
(BM), Paris (P) and a few other herbaria revealed that all
specimens of L. arenicolum, L. horrid uni, L. tetrandrum
* Studied by A.M. Venter.
and L villosum are functionally dioecious*. Such plants
express only one sex, although both male and female or-
gans are present in the same flower. In Lycium the tenn
functionally dioecious means the following:
1, functionally male plants have fully developed an-
thers with seemingly fertile pollen (Figures 1A, B; 2B).
Usually two of the stamens of the functionally male plants
are included in the corolla tube, whereas two or three are
a little exserted. These plants also carry female reproduc-
tive organs, but the pistil is underdeveloped and not func-
tional (Figure 2A). The ovule will experience difficulties
in receiving pollen, since only a rudimentary style without
a stigma may occur on the ovary, or the style and stigma
are totally absent (Figure 2A). Occasionally fruit can be
found on functionally male plants, but this condition is
rare.
2, in functionally female plants the ovary, style and
stigma are normal in structure and slightly exserted from
the corolla tube (Figure 2C), whereas the anthers of these
flowers are underdeveloped and produce no pollen (Fig-
ures 1C, D; 2D). Fruit formation is normal. In the her-
maphroditic Lycium species every flower bears normal
male and female organs.
The ovaries of the Lycium specimens are subsessile,
glabrous and have two fused carpels with axile placenta-
tion. The base of the ovary is enclosed by a greenish, red,
orange or yellow-brown nectar gland. The ovules of both
functionally male and functionally female plants are uni-
tegmic, tenuinucellate (Figure 3A, B) and anatropous to
hemi-campylotropous. These findings correspond to the
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
results obtained by Chiang-Cabrera (1981) on L. eu-
ropaeum L.
During early stages of development, one cell, lying di-
rectly below the nucellar epidermis, differentiates into a
primary archesporial cell that is conspicuous by its larger
size (Figure 3B), denser cytoplasmic contents and more
prominent nucleus. This archesporial cell gives rise to the
primary sporogenous cell, that again forms the macrospore
mother cell, which divides meiotically. Usually, a linear
tetrad of macrospores is formed in Lydian. The chalazal
macrospore develops into a Polygonum type embryo sac
that contains an egg cell (Figure 3F), two synergids (Fig-
ure 3C, G), two polar nuclei (Figure 3C, D) and three
antipodal cells (Figure 3H, I). These findings correspond
to the results obtained by Chiang-Cabrera (1981) on L.
europaeum.
In Lycium the ovules of both the functionally male and
functionally female plants have a monosporic eight-nucle-
ate Polygonum type embryo sac. In the functionally male
plants the embryo sac is fully developed, although no fer-
tilization takes place because there is no stigma, only an
ovary with, at most, a rudimentary style.
Lycium horridum is functionally dioecious, whereas L.
ferocissimum is hermaphroditic. All the L. horridum x L.
109
ferocissimum hybrid specimens examined were function-
ally dioecious. Therefore, the gene(s) causing functional
dioecy is/are dominant over the gene(s) for hermaphro-
ditism.
The embryo sacs of L. afrum and the L. afrum x L.
ferocissimum hybrid are of the normal eight-nucleate Po-
lygonum type. All the nuclei in the embryo sacs of the
studied species and hybrid, are of similar size. In the di-
oecious L. horridum the nuclei of the embryo sac differ
in size. In the functionally male plant, all the nuclei are
of the same size, but in the functionally female plants, the
polar nuclei are much larger than any of the other nuclei.
Both the functionally male and functionally female plants
of L. arenicolum and L. tetrandrum have larger polar nu-
clei than the functionally female plants of L. horridum ,
although these larger nuclei only occurred in one of the
two functionally male specimens of L. arenicolum exam-
ined.
Cytogenetic studies showed that L. arenicolum and L.
tetrandrum display more meiotic abnormalities, such as
univalents and bivalents during metaphase, as well as an
anaphase bridge in L. tetrandrum. than L. afrum and L.
horridum (Minne 1992; Spies et al. 1993). Although poly-
ploidy and meiotic abnormalities occur during micro-
sporogenesis in the anthers of the functionally male plants.
I 1GL Kl. 2. Anthers and o\;iric> ol functionally male and female specimens ol l.yrium. A. /.. villosum. A. \ enter 3(. >2. o\ar\ ol lunctionally male
plant; B, L. villosum , A. Venter 362, anthers of functionally male plant; C, L. villosum, A. Venter 358, pistil of functionally female plant; D.
L. villosum, A. Venter 358, anthers of functionally female plant. Scale bars: A, B, D, 100 pm; C, 1 mm.
110
Bothalia 24.1 (1994)
FIGURE 3. — Embryo sac development in some Lycium specimens. A, E, F, L. ajrum : A, A. Venter 352', E, F,Joubert 346. B, L. urenicoluin, J oubert
340. C, L. horridum, Joubert 334. D, G-I, L. tetrandrum : D. Spies 5001', G, A. Venter 376: FI. I. Spies 5055: FI. central cell including only
one polar nucleus, a, antipodal cell; e, egg cell; m, macrospore mother cell; n, nucleus of four nucleate embryo sac; p, polar nucleus; s,
synergid. Scale bar: 34 pm.
all the functionally female plants have normal embryo
sacs (Minne 1992). The pollen of the functionally male
plants was fully developed, whereas the pollen in the func-
tionally female plants degenerated.
CONCLUSIONS
Functionally dioecious species are present in Lycium.
All species studied, the hermaphroditic as well as the di-
oecious ones, have an eight-nucleate Polygonum type of
embryo sac. The nuclei of the synergids, egg cell, central
cell and antipodal cells were the same size in the her-
maphroditic L. afrum and the functionally male plants of
L. horridum. In the functionally female plants of L.
horridum , the nuclei of the central cell, i.e. the polar nu-
clei, were larger than the other nuclei of the embryo sac.
However, in L. arenicolum and L. tetrandrum , the polar
nuclei of both sexes were larger than the other nuclei of
the embryo sac. At all polyploid levels Polygonum type
embryo sacs were formed, irrespective of the nature and
number of meiotic abnormalities in the anthers. The ab-
sence of unreduced embryo sacs indicates that apomixis
does not occur at any ploidy level in the species studied.
A conspicuous difference in pollen development was also
evident. Seemingly viable pollen was found in the func-
tionally male plants, but none in the functionally female
plants.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank the University of the Orange Free State for
facilities provided during this study and the Foundation
for Research and Development for financial support.
REFERENCES
BERNARDELLO. L.M. 1982. Estudios en Lycium (Solanaceae). II.
Recuentos cromosomicos en entidades Argentinas. Hickenia 1:
321-328.
CHI ANG-CABRERA, F. 1 98 1 . A taxonomic study of the North American
species of Lycium '(Solanaceae). Ph.D. thesis, Department of
Botany, University of Texas, Austin.
JOUBERT, A.M. 1981. 7; Taksonomies-motfologiese studie van Lycium
in suider-Afrika. M.Sc. thesis, Department of Botany, University
of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein.
MINNE, L. 1992. A biosystematic study of the genus Lycium section
Lycium (Solanaceae). M.Sc. thesis. Department of Botany and
Genetics, University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein.
PALMER, E. & PITMAN. N. 1973. Trees of southern Africa. Balkema,
Cape Town.
SPIES. J J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1986. The genus Rubus in South Africa.
III. The occurrence of apomixis and sexuality. South African
Journal of Botany 52: 226-232.
SPIES, J.J., MINNE, L.', VENTER, H.J.T. & VENTER, A.M. 1993. A
cytogenetic study of the functionally dioecious species in the
genus Lycium (Solanaceae). South African Journal of Botany 59:
535-540.
SPURR, A.R. 1969. A low viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for
electron microscopy. Journal of Ultrastructural Research 26: 31-
34.
STEBBINS, G.L. 1971. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. Ed-
ward Arnold, London.
Bothalia 24,1 : 111-116(1994)
A life dedicated to lichens and literature, Ove Almborn, 30th July 1914 to
6th March 1992
E.I. kArnefelt*
Ove Almborn was bom on 30 July 1914 in Ronneby
in southeastern Sweden, just before the first World War.
Unlike numerous other children who were bom in the
same dark period of European history, Ove was fortunate
enough to grow up in a country which was spared the
horrors of war. He could live through a happy childhood
in the small idyllic town of Ronneby in a nice home cared
for by loving parents. This period in his life must have
formed the confident and kind personality we knew much
later. In his early school days Ove was already interested
in botany and his interest in lichens also started very early.
He matriculated in the nearby town of Karlskrona in 1933
and in the same year he started his academic studies at
the University of Lund. He studied chemistry, zoology
and botany as part of a Bachelor of Arts degree and qual-
ified as a high school teacher. With the academic studies
his interest in botany deepened and after several excur-
sions in the province of Skane, this deepened further.
Among other things he found lichens that are better known
for their southern continental distribution in northern Eu-
rope.
In 1938 he started working on a thesis, after discussions
with colleagues at Uppsala in particular, which resulted
in his doctoral dissertation in 1948. This must have been
a very stimulating period in his life with numerous excur-
sions to the Scandinavian beech forests, meetings with
colleagues, filing and determining specimens, and related
activities. Several other papers related to his thesis also
appeared during this period. His well known thesis ‘Distri-
bution and ecology of some south Scandinavian lichens’
was presented in the classical style introduced by Prof.
G.E. du Rietz and his pupils Gunnar Degelius, Sten Ahlner
as well as the later Torsten Hasselrot. Twenty-seven corti-
colous lichen species were very thoroughly investigated
and mapped and the principle factors influencing their dis-
tribution were discussed. Ove was very pleased to see that
his well-documented material came to form the basis for
a larger research project 50 years later at the Department
of Systematic Botany, on endangered lichens in southern
Sweden.
Defending a thesis in those days was something like
running through a wall. In the first place, you were of
course supposed to pass, but also had to land elegantly
like a cat with all feet on the ground, i.e. get high marks
on the thesis in order to continue on the narrow path to
an uncertain academic chair. The candidate got marks for
both the content of the thesis and the defence. Ove told
me the story of his defence several times in a very ironic
* Department of Systematic Botany, Lund University, O. Vallgatan 18-
20, S-223 61 Lund, Sweden.
MS. received: 1993-08-05.
manner, recalling the academic environment of those days.
It took place on a splendid summer’s day. May 20. The
lecture hall was beautifully decorated, as is the usual cus-
tom, with flowers of all kinds. However, since his early
youth Ove suffered from pollen allergy and therefore had
taken several drugs against an impending allergic reaction,
which resulted in him almost falling asleep and not re-
sponding promptly to questions put forward by the op-
ponents. However, Ove passed the exams very well, and
the retiring professor did not have to fail one of his last
pupils. His marks even stated that he handled the defence
in an excellent manner, in spite of the fact that he at times
was barely awake. Ove Almborn, through the success-
ful defence of his thesis, was then granted a limited pe-
riod of continuing research as a ‘docent’ (associate pro-
fessor). One question remained, and that was what to do
next?
South African lichens
The new professor, Henning Weimarck, who had pre-
viously worked on the flora of southern Africa, knew well
the many stimulating problems one could encounter in the
numerous plant groups present in this floristically very
interesting part of the world. The tradition to work on the
flora of southern Africa already started at the end of the
eighteenth century, when Carl Peter Thunberg and Anders
Sparrman collected and travelled there for extended peri-
ods. Thore C.E. Fries, who was professor at Lund for a
short period at the end of the twenties, together with Hen-
ning Weimarck and Tycho Norlind continued the Swedish
tradition of floristic work in this interesting region. There-
fore Weimarck recommended that Ove Almborn should
go to southern Africa and start collecting material for a
lichen flora of the region. The plans took fonn after he
had received a research grant from the Swedish Natural
Science Research Council. He started on his journey by
ship which arrived at Cape Town in July 1953. The South
African journey was very successful and Ove Almborn
travelled widely and made extensive collections during
the approximately six months he spent in Africa. During
his sojourn he also made many new acquaintances and,
to my knowledge, he maintained especially close contact
with Ted Schelpe through the years. He also knew many
of the older generation of South African botanists, such
as Louisa Bolus, Leslie Codd, Bernard de Winter, Allen
Dyer and many others.
When Ove returned home, his research period as a
‘docent’ was nearly over and he had to seek a position
outside the university as a teacher. He got a good oppor-
tunity at a high school in the nearby city of Malmo. Ove
would again return to South Africa in 1981 for the
AETFAT Congress, and in 1983 and 1984.
112
Bothalia24,l (1994)
I IGUKL 1. Che Almborn in ihc lichen herbarium in ihe Botanical
Museum at Lund. Photo by M.E. Hale 1972.
School teacher
From 1954 to 1966, Ove Almborn could not spend as
much time on his collections as he had wished. However,
in spite of preparing lectures, correcting exams, etc., the
time a high school teacher actually had to spend in class-
rooms was not very long and there were always a few
afternoons, evenings, weekends, and long holidays free to
work on collections. Some papers also appeared in this
period, among them Almbom’s second largest work, on
the lichen flora of the island of Hallands Vadero in 1955.
His first paper on the lichen family Teloschistaceae also
appeared in 1963, along with the first three fascicles of
his exsiccate, Lichenes Africani. In the same period Ove
Almborn also re-organized and built up a fine general li-
chen herbarium. He obviously had already made up his
mind that he would not retire as an old school master,
and he was looking for an opportunity to get back into
research at Lund. An opening came in 1966, when the
position of keeper of the herbarium became vacant.
Keeper of the herbarium
The former keeper of the herbarium Dr Tycho Norlindh
had accepted a professorship at the Natural History Mu-
seum in Stockholm, but the position at Lund had not yet
been filled. There were three competitors for the position:
one less qualified; Ove Almborn who was well qualified;
and Rolf Dahlgren who was more than qualified. When
Dahlgren withdrew his application, the road became clear
for Ove Almborn and he was appointed as keeper of the
herbarium in 1966.
There were many duties to take care of at the Botanical
Museum and through the years until his retirement in
1980, Almborn managed to organize a well-kept herbar-
ium, which also gained an international reputation for its
high standards. These were times, long before PC com-
puters entered our offices. Nevertheless, Almborn kept ex-
cellent files of all loan inquiries, loan material sent out or
borrowed and other documentation.
Although attached to the Department of Systematic
Botany, Almborn was not really engaged in any academic
teaching during these years, as his main responsibilities
concerned the museum. However, since numerous stu-
dents visited the museum in connection with various
courses through the years, Ove Almborn came into contact
with two students who had become interested in the sys-
tematics of lichens. He was also allowed to act partly as
supervisor of these students. One of these was Hans
Runemark, the fonner head of the Department of System-
atic Botany, and the other was myself.
Taxonomic literature
From fairly early on in his student days, Ove Almborn
had been very interested in botanical literature, especially
ihe older works. He had his own library and was also
very proud of a nearly complete collection of Linnaeana.
In his time as keeper of the herbarium, this interest also
took on a more collaborative character. For example, he
became much involved in helping Dr Frans Stafleu, at the
International Bureau for Plant Taxonomy and Nomencla-
ture at Utrecht, with various bibliographic problems. Thus
Almborn was of considerable help to Stafleu in producing
his monumental works with Richard S. Cowan on taxo-
nomic literature.
FIGURE 2. — Ove Almborn collecting corticolous lichens in
the fifties.
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
113
FIGURE 3. — Ove Almborn beside Ted Schelpe in the Bolus Herbarium.
Photo by E.I. Karnefelt 1984.
The collaboration with Stafleau also resulted in numer-
ous review articles published in Taxon through the years,
especially on lichenological literature published in the se-
ries Bibliotheca Lichenologica. There are numerous other
review articles, not only on lichenological literature, but
also on other major botanical works. These reviews were
published mainly in Botaniska Notiser and Nordic Journal
of Botany. Almbom’s large lichenological library also
grew extensively in this period and we now enjoy one of
the best libraries on lichenological literature at our labo-
ratories. He kindly put this library at the disposal of youn-
ger generations of lichenologists working at the Depart-
ment of Systematic Botany.
The international profile
Rather early on in his career Ove Almborn established
contact with a very large community of colleagues, fore-
most through an extensive correspondence, and through
the years he became well known internationally. This side
of him also deepened in the years as keeper of the her-
barium. Thousands of letters from lichenologists and other
botanists now exist, dating from 1950 to shortly before
his death, which are bound to be of great historical value
in years to come. The correspondence was particularly
fruitful with persons such as Mason Hale, Josef Poelt and
Rolf Santesson. Through Ove Almborn I was personally
introduced to many of these colleagues during their visits
to Lund. Ove Almborn was also a frequent participant at
botanical congresses. At these gatherings Ove really en-
joyed life, and at congress dinners or similar occasions,
he used to raise the festive atmosphere by telling good
stories from his rich repertoire on botanists of the golden
days.
The last years
We remember Ove as an extremely kind, helpful and
generous friend and colleague who was always willing to
lend a helping hand, especially when it came to sharing
some of his enormous knowledge of literature. With a cer-
tain melancholy he saw his circle of older friends getting
smaller and smaller with the years. Periodically he suf-
fered from physical pain in his back and legs and he was
frustrated that his two largest projects could not be com-
pleted, namely a lichen flora of southern Africa and a
monograph of the genus Pertusaria. I tried to console him
by pointing out that he was by no means unique in not
fulfilling all his aspirations. He prepared everything well
for his successors. He bequeathed all his possessions to
the University of Lund, a large portion of the most valu-
able classical books, which he kept at home, to the main
University library, the rest to the Department of System-
atic Botany.
Through the years Ove and I grew closer and he en-
trusted to me matters of personal concern which one
would only confide to a close relative. We had a wonderful
time indeed on our joint trip in southern Africa in 1984
in spite of the age difference of 30 years. Ove Almborn
FIGURE 4. — Ove Almborn collecting lichens in the Great Karroo. Photo
by E.I. Karnefelt 1984.
114
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
had no close relatives and it was therefore particularly
pleasing to him to see the younger generations of students
burgeoning around him in the science of lichenology,
which had become his life’s work, and which he himself
had introduced to Lund.
In my office I have a picture of Ove and myself taken,
by Aino Henssen, one nice summer’s day in 1986 in the
botanical garden of Lund. It is a dear memory to me. It
will fade through the years, as I will myself. Now his
spirit is elsewhere, as I imagined once, in Namaqualand
among Felidae and Ursiniae in the flowering season. He
died alone in his home on March 6 1992. His ashes rest
in a beautiful cemetery on top of a small hill close to
Ronneby, in his parents’ grave shaded by trees all covered
in lichens.
PUBLICATIONS BY OVE ALMBORN
1935a. Lavama pa Lunds domkyrka. Skanes natur 22: 185, 186.
1935b. Nya svenska lokaler for Parmelia laciniatula. Botaniska Notiser
1935: 464—471.
1939. Lichenological notes. 1. Botaniska Notiser 1939: 773-780.
1940. Review: Lichenum generis Usnea studium monographicum, by J.
Motyka. Botaniska Notiser 1940: 427^-29.
1942. Lichenological notes. 2. Botaniska Notiser 1942: 387-403. Also
distributed as Meddelanden fran Lunds botaniska museum 60.
1943. Lavfloran i Botaniska tradgarden i Lund. Botaniska Notiser 1943:
167-177. Also distributed as Meddelanden fran Lunds botaniska
museum 62.
1947. Lavama in Krok-Almquist, Svensk flora 11. Kryptogamer (utom
ormbunksvaxter), 6th edn. Stockholm.
1948. Distribution and ecology of some South Scandinavian lichens.
Botaniska Notiser Suppl. 1,2.
1950. Phytogeographical excursion through Blekinge. Seventh Interna-
tional Botanical Congress, Stockholm 1950. Excursion guides.
1952. A key to the sterile corticolous crustaceous lichens occurring in
South Sweden. Botaniska Notiser 1952: 239-263.
1953. Some aspects of the sociology of epiphytic lichen communities.
Seventh International Botanical Congress, Stockholm 1950. Pro-
ceedings.
1955a. Contributions to a monograph of the lichen genus Pertusaria. 1.
Svensk botanisk tidskrift 49 : 181-190.
1955b. Lavvegetation och lavflora pa Hallands Vadero. Kungliga
Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Avhandlingar i Naturskydds-
drenden 1 1 .
1956a. Lichenes africani. Fasc. I, Nos 1-25. Lund.
1956b. The South African species of Xanthoria. 8. Congres International
de Bot., Paris 1954. Comptes rendus des seances et rapports.
Sect. 18, Paris.
1957. Blekinges vaxtvarld. Natur i Blekinge : 73-97 . Stockholm.
1959. Botaniska Notiser, Lavfloran pa Hallands Vadero — en oversikt.
Skanes natur 46: 69-82.
1960. Lichenes africani , Fasc. II, Nos 26-50. Lund.
1961. Review: Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschland, Osterreich und der
Schweiz, IX Band, Die Flechten 5, Abt. 4, Teil. Usneaceae, Karl
v. Keissler, by L. Rabenhorst. Botaniska Notiser 1 14: 253, 254.
1962. Lavama in Krok-Almquist, Svensk flora 11. Kryptogamer (utom
ormbunksvaxter), 7th edn.
1963a. Studies in the lichen family Teloschistaceae. 1. Botaniska Notiser
116: 161-171.
1963b. Review: Index nominum lichenum inter annos 1932 et 1960
devulgatorum, by I.M. Lamb. Botaniska Notiser 1 16: 535, 536.
1963c. Review: Bestimmungsschlussel der hoheren Flechten von Europa,
by P.J. Poelt. Botaniska Notiser 1 16: 536, 537.
1964a. Some types of distribution in the lichen flora of southern Africa.
Tenth International Botanical Congress, Edinburgh 1964. Ab-
stracts of papers. Edinburgh.
1964b. Obituary: Adolf Hugo Magnusson, 1-3-1885-14-1-1964. Botaniska
Notiser 1 17: 428-438.
1965a. The species concept in lichen taxonomy. Botaniska Notiser 1 18:
454-457.
1965b. Review: Lichens. Handbuch der Pflanzenanatomie, by P. Ozenda.
Botaniska Notiser 118: 129, 130.
1965c. Review: Die Gattung Ochrolechia, by K. Verseghy. Botaniska
Notiser 118: 130, 131.
1965d. Review: Some lichens of Tropical Africa. IV. Dermatocarpaceae
to Pertusariaceae, by C.W. Dodge. Botaniska Notiser 118: 131,
132.
1965e. Review: The collected lichenological papers of Edward
Tuckermann, Vols I & II, by W.L. Culberson. Botaniska Notiser
118: 132, 133.
1965f. Review: Flechtenflora von Siidwestdeutschland, by K. Bertsch.
Botaniska Notiser 118: 133, 134.
1965g. Lichenes africani. Fasc. Ill, Nos 51-75. Lund.
1966. Revision of some lichen genera in southern Africa I. Botaniska
Notiser 1 19: 70-112.
1968a. Review: Kleine Kryptogamenflora, Band III, Flechten, by H.
Gams. Botaniska Notiser 121: 134, 135.
1968b. Review: The lichen genus Cladonia in North America, by J.W.
Thomson. Botaniska Notiser 121: 135, 136.
1968c. Review: The biology of lichens, by M.E. Hale Jr. Botaniska
Notiser 121: 136, 137.
1968d. Review: The lichen symbiosis, by V. Ahmadjian. Botaniska
Notiser 121: 137, 138.
1971a. Review: Chemical and botanical guide to lichen products, by C.
Culberson. Botaniska Notiser 124: 430, 431.
1971b. Review: The lichens, by M.E. Hale Jr. Botaniska Notiser 124: 431,
432.
1971c. Review: Bestimmungsschlussel europiiischer Flechten, by J.
Poelt. Botaniska Notiser 124: 521, 522.
197 Id. Review: Flechten. Unbekannte Pflanzenwelt, by E. Frey.
Botaniska Notiser 124: 522.
1972a. Review: Les Lichens, Etude Biologique et Flore Illustree, by P.
Ozenda & G. Clauzade. Botaniska Notiser 125: 128-130.
1972b. Review: The lichens of Israel, by M. Galun. Botaniska Notiser
125: 130.
1972c. Review: International Code of Botanical Nomenclature.
Botaniska Notiser 125: 201, 202.
1972d. Review: Ainsworth & Bisby’s Dictionary of the Fungi, edn 6, by
C. G. Ainsworth (ed.). Botaniska Notiser 125: 273, 274.
1972e. Review: Caloplaca sect. Gasparrinia i Nordeuropa. Taxonomiska
och ekologiska studier, by I. Nordin. Botaniska Notiser 125: 274,
275.
1973a. Review: Macrolichens of Denmark, Finland, Norway and Swe-
den, by E. Dahl & H. Krog. Botaniska Notiser 126: 133, 134.
1973b. Review: Natural history of the Danish lichens. Original investiga-
tions based upon new principles, by O. Galloe. Botaniska Notiser
126:269,270.
1973c. Review: Some lichens of tropical Africa. V. Lecanoraceae to
Physciaceae, by C.W. Dodge. Botaniska Notiser 126: 270, 271.
1974a. Review: Atlas Florae Europaeae. I. Pteridophyta, by J. Jalas & J.
Suominen (eds). Botaniska Notiser 127: 155.
1974b. Review: Air pollution and lichens, by B. Ferry, M.S. Baddeley &
D. L. Hawksworth (eds). Botaniska Notiser 127: 155, 156.
1974c. Review: Liste der Gefasspflanzen Mitteleuropas, 2nd edn, by F.
Ehrendorfer. Botaniska Notiser 127: 287, 288.
1974d. Lichenes africani. Fasc. IV, Nos 76-100. Lund.
1974e. Review: Lichens of the Antarctic continent and adjacent islands,
by C.W. Dodge. Botaniska Notiser 127: 454, 455.
Bothalia 24,1 (1994)
115
1974f. Review: The biology of lichens, 2nd edn, by M.E. Hale Jr,
Botaniska NoJiser 127: 456.
1974g. Review: Index herbariorum. Part I. The herbaria of the World, 6th
edn, by F. Stafleu (ed.). Botaniska Notiser 127: 549-551.
1974h. Review: Nordens Rustsopper, by H.B. Gjaerum. Botaniska
Notiser 127:551.
1975a. Review: The lichen genus Collema with special reference to the
extra-European species, by G. Degelius. Botaniska Notiser 128:
198, 199.
1975b. Review: The Caliciales of boreal North America, by L. Tibell.
Botaniska Notiser 128: 199, 200.
1975c. Review: The lichens, by V. Amhadjian & M.E. Hale Jr. Botaniska
Notiser 128: 275, 276/
1975d. Review: Lichenes. Eine Einfiihrung in die Flechtenkunde. by A.
Henssen & H.M. Jahns. Botaniska Notiser 128: 276, 277.
1976a. Review: Biographisch-bibliographisches Handbuch der
Lichenologie, by V. Grummann, 1974. Botaniska Notiser 129:
461.
1976b. Review: Lichenology. Progress and problems, by D. Brown, D.L.
Hawksworth & R.H. Bailey (eds). Botaniska Notiser 129: 462.
1976c. Review: Lichens, by A. Smith. Botaniska Notiser 129: 462, 463.
1977a. Review: Taxonomic literature, Vol. 1: A-G, by F.A. Stafleu & R.S.
Cowan. Botaniska Notiser 1 30: 349, 350.
1977b. Reviews: Anhangsorgane der Flechten by B. Hannemann; A mono-
graph of the lichen genus Dirinaria , by D.D. Awashti; Schwarz-
friichtige, saxicole Sippen der Gattung Caloplaca, by H. Wunder.
Epiphytische Flechten als Bioindikatoren der Luftverunreinigung, by
P. Jiirging: Epiphytic lichens and air pollution in the Netherlands,
by T. de Wit. Botaniska Notiser 130: 251-253.
1978a. Carl von Linne. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 72: 241-260.
1978b. Review: The lichen genera Physcia and allied genera in Fennoscan-
dia, by R. Moberg. Botaniska Notiser 131: 180, 181.
1978c. Review: Alectoria and allied genera in North America, by I.M.
Brodo & D.L. Hawksworth. Botaniska Notiser 131: 253, 254.
1979a. Review: International code of botanical nomenclature, by F.A.
Stafleu etal. Botaniska Notiser 132: 196.
1979b. Review: Taxonomic literature, Vol. 2: H-Le, by F.A. Stafleu &
R.S. Cowan. Botaniska Notiser 132: 573, 574.
1979c. Vaxtbytet i Lund — en gammal institution med nytt program. Svensk
Botanisk Tidskrift 73: 563-566.
1 980a. Three centuries of botany at the University of Lund, a short survey.
Botaniska Notiser 133: 45 1 — 474.
1980b. Reviews: The lichen family Pannariaceae in Europe, by PM.
Jorgensen; The brown fruticose species of Cetraria , by I.
Kamefelt. Botaniska Notiser 133: 118-120.
1980c. Review: Lavflora. Norske busk- og bladlav m fl, by H. Krog, H.
0sthagen & T. Tonsberg. Botaniska Notiser 133: 646. 647.
1980d. Review: BLV Bestimmungsbuch. Fame. Moose, Flechten Mittel-.
Nord- und Westeuropas, by H.M. Jahns. Botaniska Notiser 133:
647.
1980e. Review: Lichen ecology, by M. Seaward (ed.). Botaniska Notiser
133: 647, 648.
1980f. Review: Index nominum genericorum (plantarum), by E.A. Fan, J.
Leussink & F. Stafleu. Botaniska Notiser 133: 648.
1980g. Reviews: Ontogenetisch-systematische Studien iiber Erioderma,
by G. Keuck; Verbreitung und Soziologie epiphytischer Flechten
in Nordwestbayem. by G.A. Ritschel: Epilitische Vegetation in
einem alten Weidegebiet auf Mittel-Oland, Schweden, by L.
Rodenborg: Bestimmungsschlussel europaischer Flechten, by J.
Poelt & A. Vezda; Zur Flechtenflora der inneralpinen Trocken-
Taler, by A. Buschardt; Vegetative Strukturen der Parmeliaceae
und ihre Entwicklung. by H.A. Beltman; Die saxicolen Arten der
Flechtengattung Rinodina in Europa. by H. Mayrhofer & J. Poelt;
Die Flechtengattung Psora sensu Zahlbruckner, by G. Schneider;
Bau und Entwicklung der Flechten-Pycnidien und ihre Conidien.
by G. Vobis. Botaniska Notiser 133: 649, 650.
1982a. Review: Lavar. En falthandbok, by R. Moberg & J. Holmasen.
Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 76: 206, 207.
1982b. Review: Partnelia subgenus Amphigymnia (lichens) in East Af-
rica, by H. Krog & T.D.V. Swinscow. The Lichenologist 14: 287,
288.
1983a. Review: Epilithic lichen communities in the alpine zone of south-
ern Norway, by M. Creveld. Taxon 32: 326, 327.
1983b. Review: Lichens of South Australia, by R.B. Filson & R.W.
Rogers. Taxon 32: 328, 329.
1983c. Review: Lavar. En falthandbok, by R. Moberg & I. Holmasen.
Taxon 32: 333.
1983d. Review: Bestimmungsschlussel europaischer Flechten, by J. Poelt
& A. Vezda. Taxon 32: 334, 335.
1983e. Review: The genera of Australian lichens, by R.W. Rogers. Taxon
32: 336.
1983f. Review: Etude ecologique et phytosociologique des peuplements
licheniques saxicole-calcicoles du Sud-Est de la France, by C.
Roux. Taxon 32: 336, 337.
1983g. Review: The lichen flora of Vega in Nordland, northern Norway,
by G. Degelius. The Lichenologist 15: 209. 210.
1983h. Review: Taxonomic literature, Vol. 3: Lh-OH, by F.A. Stafleu &
R.S. Cowan. Nordic Journal of Botany 3: 180.
1983i. Review: The chemosystematics of the lichen genus Pertusaria in
North America, by M.J. Dibben. Nordic Journal of Botany 3: 414.
1983j. Flugtrumpet, Sarracenia purpurea , naturaliserad i Sverige. Svensk
Botanisk Tikskrift 77 : 209-2 1 6.
1983k. Nilssons kamp mot Darwin. Sydsvenska Dagbladet Snallposten
20-5-1983. Malmo.
1984a. Review: A monograph of the lichen genus Coccocarpia, by L.
Arvidsson. Nordic Journal of Botany 4: 502.
1984b. Review: Moose als Bioindikatoren von Schwermetall-Immission.
by J. Maschke. Vie Lichenologist 16: 100.
1984c. Review: Botanical exploration of southern Africa, by M. Gunn &
L.E. Codd. Nordic Journal of Botany 4: 332.
1984d. Review: A monograph of the lichen family Megalosporaceae, by
H. Sipman, 1983. Nordic Journal of Botany A: 512.
1985a. Review: A taxonomic study of the lichen genus Micarea in Eu-
rope, by B.J. Coppins, 1983. Taxon 34: 166.
1985b. Review: The lichens of Sweden and Norway, by R. Santesson,
1984. Taxon 34: 172.
1985c. Some patterns of distribution in the lichen flora of southern Africa.
Abstract of papers presented at the 11th plenary meeting (June
10-14, 1985) of the Association for the taxonomic study of the
flora of tropical Africa: 17, 18. St Louis, Missouri.
1985d. Tegner om kollegan Agardh: ‘Han ar den ende i Lund som ar mig
intellektuellt jambordig’. Sydsvenska Dagbladet Snallposten 21-
1-1985. Malmo.
1985e. Carl Adolph Agardh. Nagra minnesord. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift
79:401-108.
1985f. Agardhsherbariet i Lund. Carl Adolph Agardh 1785-1859. En
minnesbok utgiven av Akademiska Foreningen: 49-57. Lund.
1986. Review: Flora of New Zealand lichens, by D.J. Galloway. Taxon
35: 907.
1987a. Lichens at high altitudes in southern Africa. In E. Peveling,
Progress and problems in lichenology in the eighties. Bibliotheca
Lichenologica 25: 401 — 417.
1987b. Review of seminar: The 18th century expedition by Forsskal and
Niebuhr to the Orient, by F.N. Hepper. Lunds Botaniska
Forenings Medlemsblad 1986 : 9, 10.
1987c. Review: Svensk flora [Swedish translation of Flora suecica,
Stockholm 1755], by C. von Linne. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 81:
46-48.
1987d. Review: The ecologist, by T. Soderqvist. Taxon 36: 785.
1987e. Review: Catalogue of the lichens of Papua New Guinea and Irian
Jaya, by H. Streimann. Taxon 36: 785.
1988a. Review: ZurBiologie und SystematikderFlechtengattungenf/ep-
pia and Peltula im Siidlichen Afrika, by B. Biidel. Taxon 37: 418.
1988b. Review: Brasilianische Flechten, 1. Die Gattung Pvxine. by K.
Kalb. Taxon 37:419.
1988c. Review: Progress and problems in lichenology in the eighties, by
E. Peveling (ed.). Taxon 37: 421.
1988d. Review: Flora y vegetation liquenica epifita de los sabinares
Herrenos, by C.E. Hernandez Padron. Taxon 37: 93 1 .
1988e. Review: Monographic der Flechtengattung Thelenella, by H.
Mayrhofer. Taxon 37: 934.
1988f. Lichenes africani Fasc. V. Nos 101-125. Lund.
116
Bothalia 24,1 ( 1994)
1988g. Some distribution patterns in the lichen flora of South Africa.
Monographs of Missouri Botanical Garden 25: 429^432.
1989a. Revision of the lichen genus Teloschistes in central and southern
Africa. Nordic Journal of Botany 8: 521-537.
1989b. Review: CRC Handbook of Lichenology, 3 vols, by M. Galun
fed.). Taxon 38: 612, 613.
1989c. Review: Macrolichens of East Africa, by T.D.V. Swinscov & H.
Krog. Taxon 38: 615.
1989d. Review: Studien fiber die saxicolen Arten der Flechtengattung
Lecania in Europa. II. Lecania s. str., by M. Mayrhofer. Taxon 38:
72.
1989e. Review: Neue oder bemerkenswerte Arten der Flechtenfamilie
Gomphillaceae in der Neotropis, by K. Kalb & A. Vezda. Taxon
38: 70.
1989f. Review: Lichens, bryophytes and air quality, by T.H. Nash, III &
V. Wirth (eds). Taxon 38: 72, 73.
1989g. Heribert Nilsson. Svenskt Biografiskt Lexikon 26: 716-720.
1990a. Review: The lichenicolous fungi of Greenland, by V. Alstrup &
D.L. Hawksworth. Taxon 39: 637.
1990b. Review: Systematics of Oropogon (Alectoriaceae) in the New
World, by T. Esslinger. Taxon 39: 638.
1990c. Review: Los generos Heppiay Peltula (Liquenes) en Europa Occi-
dental y Norte de Africa, by J.M. Egea. Taxon 39: 469.
1990d. Review: Kritik der pflanzensoziologischen Klassifikation am Beispiel
calciphytisch-saxicoler Flechten- und Moosgemeinschaften im
Bereich des Frankendolomits, by M. Pietschmann & V. Wirth. Taxon
39:469,470.
1990e. Review: A monograph of the saxicolous lecideoid lichens of
Australia (excl. Tasmania), by G. Rambold. Taxon 39: 470.
1990f. Review: La familia Opegraphaceae en el area Mediterranea de la
Peninsula Iberica y Norte de Africa, by P. Torrente & J.M. Egea.
Taxon 39: 470.
1990g. Review: Lecideicole Ascomyceten: Eine Revision der obligat
lichenicolen Ascomyceten auf lecideoiden Flechten, by D.
Triebel. Taxon 39: 470, 471.
1990h. Review: Svensk Skorplavsflora, by T. Foucard. Svensk Botanisk
Tidskrift 84: 311.
1991a. Review: Contributions to lichenology/Beitrage zur Lichenologie:
in honour of A. Henssen/Festschrift A. Henssen, by H.M. Jahns
fed.). Taxon 40: 162.
1991b. Review: Untersuchungen an gesteinsbewohnenden xanthonhaltigen
Sippen der Flechtengattung Lecidella (Lecanoraceae, Lecanorales)
unter besonderer Beriicksichtigung von aussereuropaischen Proben
exklusive Amerika, by J.G. Knoph. Taxon 40: 162.
1991c. Review: Eine Revision der lichenicolen Arten der Sammelgattung
Rosellinia (Ascomycetes), by M. Matzer & J. Hafeliner. Taxon
40: 163.
1 99 1 d. Lichenes africani Fasc. VI, Nos 126-150. Lund.
199 le. Review: W. Nylander's collected lichenological papers, by T. Ahti
fed.). Taxon 40: 357.
1 99 1 f . Review: A synopsis of the lichen genus Xanthopannelia (Vainio)
Hale (Ascomycotina, Parmeliaceae), by M.E. Hale Jr. Taxon 40:
360.
199 lg. Review: Revision der europaischen Arten der Flechtengattung
Rhizocarpon mit nichtgelbem Lager und vielzelligen Sporen, by
T. Feuerer. Taxon 40: 535, 536.
199 lh. Review: A key to the microlichens of India, Nepal and Sri Lanka,
by D.D. Awashti. Taxon 40: 699.
1 99 1 i. Review: Zur Kenntnis der Flechtenflora am Hohen Meissner und
in seinem Vorland (Hessen) under besonderer Beriicksichtigung
chemischer Merkmale, by H. Kiimmerling. Taxon 40: 700.
1 99 1 j. Carl Fedrik Otto Nordstedt. Svenskt Biografiskt Lexikon 27: 438-
440.
1992. Some overlooked or misidentified species of Teloschistes from
South America and a key to the South American species. Nordic
Journal of Botany 12: 361-364.
Bothalia 24,1: 117-119(1994)
Book Reviews
A FIELD GUIDE TO THE NATAL DRAKENSBERG by DAVE & PAT
IRWIN. 1992. Rhodes University, Grahamstown 6140. Pp. iv + 417, 99
colour photographs, 1 map, 113 figures. ISBN 0-86810-239-3. Price:
R66,00.
The first edition of this field guide appeared in 1980 and I reviewed
it in Bothalia (Killick 1981 ). Five impressions followed from 1980-1985
and this is the second edition, fully revised, enlarged and running to
over 400 pages (including appendices etc.) instead of the original 249
pages. The field guide covers almost every aspect of the natural features
of the Berg and is designed ‘to be carried on hikes and used to identify
and interpret the weather, rocks, peaks, plants, animals and ecosystems
encountered along the way’. Also included is a useful section on emer-
gencies and how to deal with them, useful addresses, Zulu and Sesotho
phrases and a section on available maps and aerial photographs. A new
innovation is the inclusion of diagnostic keys for the identification of
minerals, plants and animals plus, on the inside cover, an intriguing
sample key which enables one to distinguish between a wild hairy haggis,
a Drakensberg yeti and a human! Perhaps this key will go some way
to converting the layman to the advantages and virtues of keys which,
in my experience are anathema to most laymen. Almost 100 colour
photographs illustrate various physical features, San rock paintings, veg-
etation, individual plants, animals and geology.
The chapter which interests me the most is Chapter 8 on the veg-
etation (and flora). In the first paragraph the authors mention that the
terms afromontane and afro-alpine used in reference to the Drakensberg
flora by myself (actually by several others before me) have been criticized
on the grounds that the flora of the Drakensberg shows closer affinities
with the flora of the Cape than that of the tropical mountains of Africa.
In self-defence I would like to explain that: 1, in my 1978 paper (Killick
1978) which the Irwins cite, I did not express personal views on the
afromontane region; 2, the closer affinity with the Cape flora was pointed
out by me as early as 1963 in my Cathedral Peak memoir (Killick
1963); and 3, the small number of species (18) common to the
Drakensberg and mountains of tropical East Africa was mentioned in
my 1978 paper. Unfortunately, the term afro-alpine has become estab-
lished in South African phytogeography but, in view of 2 and 3 above,
the term is clearly a misnomer. In a paper (Killick in press) recently
submitted to an IUCN publication. Centres of plant diversity, I have,
in consultation with Prof. Olov Hedberg, expert on the flora of the East
African mountains and Dr Steve Davis of IUCN, renamed the region
above about 1 800 m, the Drakensberg Alpine Region, which equals
Phillips's ( 1917) Eastern Mountain Region and Hilliard & Bunt's (1987)
Southeastern Mountain Regional Mosaic. So much for phytogeography,
which Stanley Cain ( 1944), himself a phytogeographer of note, described
as a ‘borderline science’ — at least the interpretive part of it!
The authors then describe the major plant communities, the aquatic
vegetation, forest, scrub, fynbos. Protea Savannah (why the ‘h' when
the word is derived from the Spanish ‘zavana’ (now ‘sabana’) said to
be of Caribbean origin?), montane and subalpine grassland, alpine grass-
land, Erica-Helichrysum Heath and finally, invasive aliens. The discus-
sion of montane and subalpine grassland requires comment. The authors
state that Southern Tall Grassveld is confined to small areas in the foot-
hills of the central Berg and that Highland Sourveld coincides roughly
with the montane belt. Is the natural grassland of the montane belt not
Southern Tall Grassveld which has been largely degraded by fire to
grassland dominated by Themeda triandra without the co-dominance of
Hyparrhenia hirta and the presence of other tall grass species? A basal
cover analysis which I carried out in the uMlambonja Valley in 1953
approximates fairly closely with Acocks’s ‘species of general occurrence’
in Southern Tall Grassveld with Themeda triandra dominant but
Hyparrhenia hirta occupying fourth position. The fact that the authors
mention that small areas of Southern Tall Grassveld are conserved in
the foothills of the central Berg suggests that this community is the
natural grassland of the montane belt. As regards Highland Sourveld,
it is generally accepted, I think, that this community occurs on the Little
Berg in the subalpine belt (Everson & Tainton 1984). The Irwins state
that Themeda-Festuca Alpine Veld occurs from the upper limit of High-
land Sourveld to the summit plateau. Themeda triandra Grassland cer-
tainly covers most of the Little Berg extending to about 2 600 m on
xerocline slopes and reaching 2 130 m on mesocline slopes. Above
2 600 m on xerocline slopes it loses its identity and mixes with Temperate
Grassland dominated not only by a Festuca, namely Festuca costata,
but also in parts by Pentaschistis tysonii or Bromns firmior. Finally, in
describing Alpine Grassland the authors have been inconsistent and in-
accurate. In the text they describe the Alpine Grassland on the summit
as Festuca caprina-Merxmuellera disticha Grassland, but in Figure 8.5
it is described as ‘Alpine Grassland (Festuca)' , i.e. with a single dom-
inant. What about Pentaschistis oreodoxa, a third dominant or co-dom-
inant? The authors refer to the large tussocks of Merxmuellera macowanii
and M. disticha. I do not recollect ever seeing M. macowanii on the
summit plateau and can only suspect that they have confused the grass
with M. drakensbergensis or M. stereophylla, both tussock grasses. As
for M. disticha, it is scarcely a tussock grass — rather tufted.
In identifying the plants the authors have divided them into 1, grasses
and grass-like plants; 2, flowering herbs and small shmbs; and 3, shrubs
and trees. The plants are classified into groups and these groups are set
out in tables headed by the main diagnostic character/s used, other di-
agnostic characters, and habitat preferences and altitude range. There is
no key to individual species or genera. The grasses are classified ac-
cording to inflorescence, whereas the flowering herbs and shrubs are
divided initially into monocotyledons and dicotyledons and then clas-
sified by inflorescence. The trees and taller shrubs are classified into
groups based on leaf shape and margin. Apart from the tabular ‘keys’,
there is a key to genera on some common trees and shrubs with very
small leaves. Accompanying the tables are simple line drawings of the
plants. The last page of illustrations (p. 8.58) is headed ‘ferns', and
includes illustrations of five ferns and one moss. The chapter concludes
with two very useful and instructive sketches, the first (Figure 8.5) show-
ing the plant communities of the Natal Drakensberg and the second
(Figure 8.6), showing the effects of aspect on the distribution of vege-
tation in the valleys of the Little Berg. A few words about the colour
photographs of plants. Of the 38 photographs, 16 are without species
names. Surely, these species could have been identified with very little
effort. Surprisingly, Euryops evansii as a colour photograph is without
a species name, but has a species name in the tabular ‘key’. There is
a number of incorrect spellings of plant names, some obviously typo-
graphic errors. They are, with the incorrect name cited first:
Burkheya/Berkheya, Phillipia/Philippia ( P. evansii, of course, is now
Erica evansii), Bowkeria verticellata/B. verticillata, Rhoicissus revoillii
R. revoilii, Podocarpus henkellii/P. henkelii, Merxmeullera/Merx-
muellera and Buddleia/Buddleja. The name Athanasia calva cited by
the authors is the basionym of Inulanthera calva. It is a pity that the
authors did not have Chapter 8 checked by a botanist in the manuscript
as well as in the proof stage.
In conclusion, this revised and enlarged field guide, very reasonably
priced, is a most comprehensive and useful publication — one which tes-
tifies to the intimate knowledge that the authors have of the Natal
Drakensberg region. The fact that the field guide has run to six im-
pressions, indicates very clearly how successful the guide has been over
a period of 13 years. It is certainly a must for hikers, climbers and
holidaymakers who wish to know something about the Drakensberg
scene. I only wish that such a field guide had been available when I
started work at Cathedral Peak 43 years ago! However, presumably at
that time, knowledge of the Drakensberg environment was insufficient
to produce a satisfactory field guide. Apart from the few flaws in the
chapter on vegetation, I recommend the guide without reserve. Dave
and Pat Irwin are to be congratulated on a fine publication.
REFERENCES
CAIN, S.A. 1944. Foundations of plant geography. Harper & Brothers,
New York & London.
EVERSON, C.S. & TAINTON, N.M. 1984. The effect of thirty years of
burning on the highland sourveld of Natal. Journal of the Grass-
land Society of southern Africa 1,3: 15-20.
HILLIARD. O. & BURTT, B.L. 1987. The botany of the southern Natal
Drakensberg. National Botanic Gardens, Cape Town.
KILLICK, D.l.B. 1963. An account of the plant ecology of the Cathedral
Peak area of the Natal Drakensberg. Memoirs of the Botanical
Survey of South Africa No. 34.
Bothalia 24,1 ( 1994)
KILLICK, D.J.B. 1978. The afro-alpine region. In M.J. Werger, Biogeo-
graphy and ecology of southern Africa : 515-542. Junk, The
Hague.
KILLICK, D.J.B. 1981. Book review: A field guide to the Natal
Drakensberg by Pat Irwin, John Ackhurst & David Irwin.
Bothalia 13: 591, 592.
KILLICK, D.J.B. in press. The Drakensberg alpine region. In S. Davis,
Centres of plant diversity. IUCN, London.
PHILLIPS, E.P. 1917. A contribution to the flora of the Leribe plateau and
environs with a discussion of the floras of Basutoland, the
Kalahari, and the south-eastern regions. Annals of the South Afri-
can Museum 16: 1-379.
D.J.B. KILLICK*
* 465 Sappers Contour, Lynnwood. Pretoria 008 1 .
PHYLOGENY AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE ORCHID FAMILY
by R.L. DRESSLER. 1993. Cambridge University Press, The Edinburgh
Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, England. Pp. 314. Size 272 x 195 mm.
ISBN 0 521 45058 6. Price: £35 (approx. R230.00).
The book is R.L. Dressler’s current view of the classification and
phylogeny of the orchid family which is, due to its remarkable size and
diversity (19 500 species worldwide), certainly one of the most difficult
plant groups to classify. It is an update of the 1981 version of his book
The Orchids — natural history and classification , Harvard University
Press, Cambridge & London, and is based on all of the taxonomically
useful information available at present. New information which has
emerged since the publication of Dressler’s 1981 book includes onto-
genetic, cytological, ultrastructural, chemical and molecular data. How-
ever, our knowledge is still incomplete in certain aspects (as is
emphasized by Dressier himself). In view of the absence of adequate
information in some areas, the advisability of producing another clas-
sification is occasionally questioned, but there can be no doubt that we
need an updated classification as a framework for further research.
Structure and other evidence of relationship are discussed in detail.
The chapter is illustrated by line drawings of various features and by
SEM micrographs of seeds. In a short paragraph at the end of each set
of characters the phylogenetic significance and probable polarity of the
characters are briefly discussed.
The chapter ‘orchid phylogeny’ deals with general aspects of the
phylogeny of the family. Possible relationships to other Monocotyle-
donous families are indicated, and the shared characters are briefly out-
lined. It is pointed out that molecular data can be expected in the near
future which may help to clarify the situation. The hypothetical ancestral
orchid is described. Further subchapters deal with primitive features in
the Orchidaceae, with the phylogeny of the subfamilies, and with the
diversity and size of the genera. The probable evolution of some features
is discussed, including the evolution of corm and reed-like stem, nec-
taries, gynostemium structures, and orchid seeds. Also an explanation
of the ‘phylogenetic diagrams’ used in the book is given here. These
diagrams represent Dressler’s hypotheses of orchid relationships, and
unlike cladograms they were not generated by computer programs but
were entirely made ‘by hand’.
The main part of the book is devoted to the classification of the
family Orchidaceae. Compared to the 1981 book, the classification of
subfamilies remained the same except for the Vandoideae; this latter
subfamily was recognized by most previous taxonomists (including
Dressier 1981 ) but is here shown to be polyphyletic and is thought to
encompass several advanced taxa of the Epidendroideae. Whereas the
placement of tribes and subtribes changed considerably, only rather few
genera were shifted to other subtribes. It should be noted that Dressler’s
systematic concept differs considerably from early concepts (which many
readers will be familiar with as they were commonly used in orchid
flora treatments). In these, all ‘primitive’ taxa were lumped into one
group ‘Neottieae’ (= ‘Neottioideae’) which is now thought to be a poly-
phyletic grade comprising ‘primitive’ genera actually belonging to all
other monandrous subfamilies. In the present book nearly 800 genera
placed in five subfamilies, 23 tribes and 70 subtribes are recognized.
In all taxa extensive reference is made to previous works.
The taxa dealt with in the book are: Subfam. Apostasioideae (2 or
3 stamens) is a small group of ‘primitive’ terrestrial orchids in tropical
rain forests in South East Asia. Subfam. Cypripedioideae (2 stamens)
is another small group with many primitive features. The species are
terrestrial or epiphytic, and occur in the northern hemisphere, in tropical
Asia and tropical America. They are the ‘slipper orchids' which are
well known in horticulture. All of the following orchids have only 1
stamen. Subfam. Spiranthoideae (1 183 species; tropics of America and
Asia) and subfam. Orchidoideae (1 363 species; Australia, Africa, north-
ern hemisphere) are mostly terrestrial. The Orchidoideae are well re-
presented in the southern African orchid flora (e.g. Holothrix. Brachy-
corythis. Habenaria, Disa, Satyrium, Corycium, Disperis). The subfam.
Epidendroideae is split into two parts which are placed in two different
sections of the book. Part 1 is made up of several small ‘primitive’
groups with uncertain taxonomic affinities. Part 2 comprises the majority
of the orchids most of which are epiphytes in the tropics of the world,
and constitute the largest percentage of the orchids known in horticulture.
Among southern African orchids they comprise terrestrial genera like
Liparis or Eulophia and epiphytic genera like Angraecum or Mystacid-
ium.
The line drawings are very informative and phylogenetic diagrams
are used wherever possible to demonstrate the possible relationships
among the taxa. 96 excellent colour illustrations of habits and flowers
of rare or seldom seen orchid species are equally useful, and give the
reader some impression of the diversity found in the family.
The next chapter is entitled "Misfits, parallelisms, and miscellaneous
problems’. A few orchid genera that cannot be placed on the basis of
the currently available data are listed here. Special problem areas among
other taxa are described, and the information we would need most is
briefly outlined. Factors which influence the pattern of evolution like
parallelism, false advertisement to pollinators, and breeding systems are
discussed. The principles of classification and phylogenetic analysis are
dealt with in the subsequent chapter, giving a short but very useful
description of the phylogenetic methodology and terminology.
A detailed glossary, keys to major orchid groups, a summary of the
classification with a list of genera (unfortunately the subtribal name
‘Diuridinae’ was left out), a list of the cited literature (nearly 500 entries)
and a general index form the final part of the book.
The book is an invaluable contribution on a fascinating and difficult
plant group written by the most eminent botanist in the field, and is
the first comprehensive classification since the abovementioned publi-
cation by the same author in 1981. R.L. Dressier is currently working
at the Florida Museum of Natural History. His more than 25 years of
orchid research have taken him to tropical America, Asia and Australia
where he has carried out extensive field work. The detailed knowledge
of various aspects of the orchids undoubtedly make him the most suitable
person to write a book of this scope. Although new research results
will emerge in coming years and some of them may call in question
parts of the present classification, the book will certainly be used as a
reference for many generations to come. As such it can be recommended
to the student who is working on any aspect of the orchids.
H. KURZWEIL*
* Compton Herbarium, NBI, Kirstenbosch, Private Bag X7, Claremont,
Cape Town 7735.
MORPHOLOGY OF FLOWERS AND INFLORESCENCES by F.
WEBERLING. 1992. English translation by R.J. Pankhurst. Cambridge
University Press, The Pitt Building, Trumpington St, Cambridge CB2
1RP, England. Price: paperback £22.95; $39.95. ISBN 0 521 43832 2.
This book was originally published in German in 1981 . The hardcover
English translation of this valuable work appeared in 1989 and was
welcomed by non-German readers. With the increase in book prices
and (he present financial struggle of tertiary educational institutions,
this cheaper, paperback version must be applauded. This book also comes
at a time where there is a tendency to overemphasize the importance
of molecular biology while the whole-plant morphology is neglected.
The book is divided into three parts. The first major part deals in
detail with the morphology of the flower. It starts with the phylogenetic
Bothalia 24,2 ( 1994)
119
aspects of the derivation of the flower and gives an in-depth account
of the variation in structure of all the flower parts, which is actually a
well-illustrated review of flower morphology. A vast terminology is im-
plemented to describe intricate structures and concepts, and a glossary
would have been a great asset for students entering this field. More
ontogenetic information could have contributed to the understanding of
difficult concepts.
A proper synthesis of inflorescence morphology and a basis for com-
paring different inflorescence types, has been required for a long time.
In the second part of this book the author addresses this problem. By
distinguishing between monotelic and polytelic inflorescences the author
has provided a basis for identifying homologous parts and relating them
to different inflorescence types. Numerous high quality illustrations help
the reader to follow the descriptions.
In order to emphasize the fact that flowers are indeed functional
units, brief accounts on pollination biology and seed dispersal are in-
cluded in the third part of the book.
This book is a must for students in plant taxonomy and it is hoped
that future descriptions of flowers and inflorescences will draw gener-
ously from this valuable source.
P.J. ROBBERTSE*
* Margaretha Mes Institute For Seed Research, University of Pretoria,
Pretoria.
MODELLING BIOLOGICAL POPULATIONS IN SPACE AND TIME
by E. RENSHAW. 1991. Cambridge studies in mathematical biology No.
11. Cambridge University Press, The Pitt Building, Trumpington st, Cam-
bridge CB2 1RP, England. Pp. 403. (First paperback edition 1993). Price:
£19.95; US$ 29.95.
Where inferring process from pattern is concerned, mathematics is
by no means an end in itself — page 12 in the volume under review.
Population biology is a field where mathematical elegance and real-
world complexity come face-to-face and highlight limitations to human
understanding of the natural world. This book is a competent attempt
to find bridges which link the two areas of activity, and provides reading
material which should be accessible and stimulating to advanced students
of both mathematics and biology. It will also serve as a good reference
volume for any research scientist with a professional interest in the
mathematical modelling of population dynamics.
The contents of the book are well laid out, and will permit a reader
in any of the above three categories to find a particular area of interest
without much difficulty. Non-mathematically oriented readers are helped
by asterisks at the subheading level (also reflected in the table of contents)
which mark sections that can be omitted (it is claimed) without inter-
rupting the flow of the text. A strategically placed 3-page glossary of
symbols and notation just before the commencement of Chapter 1 adds
to this support. I am not quite sure, however, of the author’s definition
of mathematical orientation. Unmarked sections retain a good many
identities and functions which left my (admittedly rusty) undergraduate
training in mathematics somewhat stretched, and had me flipping back
to the section headings to see if I had any excuse for skipping to the
next one. In spite of the heavy going at times, the linking text in most
instances provides enough accessible reference points for the rapid and/or
mathematically-limited reader to extract a conceptual outline of the topic
at hand, and enough information to sustain interest and utility.
The book is divided into 1 1 chapters, most of them containing well-
chosen illustrations from seminal research papers or texts. These cita-
tions are often steeped in history, such as Huffaker’s (1958) experiment
to explore limitations of the deterministic Lotka-Volterra model, or an
historical account of the logistic model dating back to Verhulst (1838).
Other examples range from Gause’s (1934) concerted attempts to make
biology fit mathematical theory (a reminder to our modem age where
computer wizardry can even more easily blur the boundary between the
virtual and the real worlds), through dispersal of oaks ( Quercus robur)
in Britain during historical time (Skellam 1951), to quantitative descrip-
tions of pathogenic epidemics involving measles, cholera and the Black
Death. Throughout the book deterministic and stochastic approaches
to problems are dealt with side by side, with frequent caveats that neither
alone can provide a complete theory for the dynamics of populations.
The first three chapters give an excellent broad framework, and deal
with underlying issues of population modelling, e.g. the nature, appli-
cability and importance of deterministic, stochastic and simulation mod-
els; birth-death-migration processes; extinction probabilities; logistic
population growth (using both deterministic and stochastic models); and
quasi-equilibrium probabilities (a section amongst several others marked
with an asterisk). Most of the remaining eight chapters expand upon
the issues already raised in the first three, which is useful in directing
potential users of techniques to the appropriate area of information. It
also offers the casual reader a sense of order in an otherwise in-
timidatingly open-ended field of knowledge. The later chapter headings
are as follows: Time-lag models of population growth (Chap. 4); Com-
petition processes (Chap. 5); Predator-prey processes (Chap. 6); Spatial
predator-prey systems (Chap. 7); Fluctuating environments (Chap. 8);
Spatial population dynamics (Chap. 9); Epidemic Processes (Chap. 10);
and Linear and branching architectures (Chap. 11). This last chapter
may at first glance appear to be out of place in that it deals for the
most part literally with plant morphology. However, the analogies be-
tween invasion of roots into the soil medium, and the spread of invasive
organisms into new environments become clear as the author develops
the underlying mathematical models and traces development of the sub-
ject from early analytic methods (e.g. Gravelius 1914).
One topic that receives scant attention in this book, is that of matrix
population models. In Chapter 7 some space is devoted to matrix rep-
resentation of predator-prey communities spread over different colonies,
and between which migration is permitted. This points to a readily ac-
cessible means of simulating predator-prey relations in simple commu-
nities, and a useful alternative to the continuous function treatments of
classical theory. My disappointment, however, stems from the complete
absence of demographic considerations, a topic so eminently suited to
the matrix model approach and decidedly an important descriptor of
populations in time and space. A separate feature of the book which
may be of interest to dedicated simulation modellers (or perhaps computer
science students who have become entangled in modelling biological
population dynamics) is the occasional inclusion of bits of FORTRAN
code and their relationship to NAG-routines. (NAG, the glossary tells
me, is the Numerical Algorithms Group, which I can only guess is a
piece of standard simulation software known to mainline modellers, but
not to me).
The book is not absolutely up to date — and wasn't even when it
first appeared in 1991 in the hardcover edition. Of the over 200 references
only 6% are newer than 1985, and more than 50% are older than 1970.
The downside of this is obviously that the reader is left wondering about
the nature of the cutting-edge, but given the thorough treatment of his-
torical aspects — 14% of the references are 1940 and older — it does make
for some informative and stimulating reading on a wide range of topics
falling into the field of population biology. Not a comprehensive text,
but not a bad buy for some interesting reading, a good historical per-
spective, and some good common-sense tools for combining mathemat-
ical precision with the messy world of biology.
REFERENCES
GAUSE, G.F. 1934. The struggle for existence. Williams & Wilkins,
Baltimore.
GRAVELIUS, H. 1914. Flusskunde. Goschen, Berlin.
HUFFAKER, C.B. 1958. Experimental studies on predation: dispersion
factors and predator-prey interactions. Hilgardia 27: 343-383.
SKELLAM, J.G. 1951. Random dispersal in theoretical populations.
Biometrika 38: 196-218.
VERHULST, P.F. 1838. Notice sur la loi que la population suit dans son
accroissement. Corriere Math, et Phvs. publ. par A. Quetelet, T.X:
113-121.
G.W. DAVIS*
* Stress Ecology Research Unit, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag
X7, Claremont 7735.
# *
.
BOTHALIA
Volume 24,1 May /Mei 1994
CONTENTS-INHOUD
1. Three new species of Serruria (Proteaceae) from the southwestern Cape. J.P. ROURKE 1
2. Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from southern Africa. 4. Mannia capensis, section and subgenus
Xeromannia (Aytoniaceae). S.M. PEROLD 9
3. Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from southern Africa. 5. The genus Exormotheca , E. pustulosa
and E. holstii. S.M. PEROLD 15
4. Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae). XIV. Notes on the genus Erica. E.G.H. OLIVER and INGE M.
OLIVER 25
5. Notes on African plants:
Asphodelaceae/Aloaceae. Was Gasteria nitida var. armstrongii validly published? G.F. SMITH,
B-E. VAN WYK & E.J. VAN JAARSVELD 34
Asphodelaceae/Aloaceae. Aloe barberae to replace A. bainesii. G.F. SMITH, B-E. VAN WYK &
H.F. GLEN 34
Boraginaceae. The correct author citation for Lobostemon montanus. M.H. BUYS and J.J.A. VAN
"DERWALT 35
Rosaceae. Cliffortia longifolia , a ‘good' species or should it be a variety under C. strobiliferaP. . A.C.
FELLINGHAM . 31
6. Ferns and flowering plants of Klaserie Private Nature Reserve, eastern Transvaal: an annotated checklist.
N. ZAMBATIS 37
7. External fruit morphology of southern African Arundineae (Arundinoideae: Poaceae). N.P. BARKER . 55
8. Names of the southern African species of Rhus (Anacardiaceae) and their etymology. R.O. MOFFETT . 67
9. Flowering phenology in the arid winter rainfall region of southern Africa. M. STRUCK 77
10. Miscellaneous notes:
Chromosome counts for seven species of Cineraria (Senecioneae, Asteraceae). G.V. CRON, B-E.
VAN WYK and P.L.D. VINCENT 91
Acytotaxonomic study of some representatives of the tribe Cynodonteae (Chloridoideae, Poaceae).
A. STRYDOM and J.J. SPIES 92
Systematic studies in the genus Mohria (Anemiaceae). V. Karyology (Pteridophyta). J.P. ROUX . 97
1 1 . Embryo sac development in some representatives of the tribe Cynodonteae (Poaceae). A.'STRYDOM and
J.J. SPIES ' 101
1 2. Breeding systems in some representatives of the genus Lycium (Solanaceae). L. MINNE, J.J. SPIES, H.J.T.
VENTER and A.M. VENTER 107
13. A life dedicated to lichens and literature, Ove Almborn (30-07-1914— 06-03-1992). E.I. KARNEFELT . Ill
14. Book reviews 117
Abstracted, indexed or listed in/opgesorn. in indeksopgeneem of gelys in: AGRICOLA. Biological Abstracts. Biological Abstracts/Reports. Reviews,
and Meetings, BIOSIS Document Express, Current Advances in Plant Science, Current Contents, Field Crop Abstracts, Forestry Abstracts, Herbage
Abstract v, Excerpta Botanica, Revue of Plant Pathology, Revue of Medical and Veterinary Mycology and /en The Kew Record of Taxonomic Literature.
ISSN 0006 8241
© Published by and obtainable from/gepubliseer deuren verkrygbaar van: National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X 101, Pretoria 000 1 , South
Africa/Nasionale Botaniese Instituut, Privaatsak X 101 , Pretoria 0001 ,Suid-Afrika.Typesetting/kopieset: S.S. Brink (NBI). Reproduction and printing
by/reproduksie en drukwerk dcur: Aurora Printers, P.O. Box 422, Pretoria 0001/Aurora Drukkers, Posbus 422, Pretoria 001. Tel. (012) 327-5073.