ISSN 0006 8241 = Bothalia
Bothalia
’N TYDSKRIF VIR PLANTKUNDIGE NAVORSING
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Vol. 24,2
Oct./Okt. 1994
TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE NATIONAL BOTANICAL INSTITUTE, PRETORIA
TEGNIESE PUBLIKASIES VAN DIE NASIONALE BOTANIESE INSTITUUT, PRETORIA
Obtainable from the National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XI 01,
Pretoria 0001, Republic of South Africa. A catalogue of all available
publications will be issued on request.
BOTHALIA
Bothalia is named in honour of General Louis Botha, first Premier and
Minister of Agriculture of the Union of South Africa. This house journal
of the National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, is devoted to the furtherance
of botanical science. The main fields covered are taxonomy, ecology,
anatomy and cytology. Two parts of the journal and an index to contents,
authors and subjects are published annually.
A booklet of the contents to Vols 1-20 is available.
Verkrygbaar van die Nasionale Botaniese Instituut, Privaatsak XI 01,
Pretoria 000 1, Republiek van Suid-Afrika. 'n Katalogus van allebeskik-
bare publikasies kan aangevra word.
Bothalia is vemoem ter ere van Generaal Louis Botha, eerste Eerste Minister
en Minister van Landbou van die Unie van S«id- Afrika. Hierdie lyfblad van
die Nasionale Botaniese Instituut, Pretoria, is gewy aan die bevordering van
die wetenskap van plantkunde. Die hoofgebiede wat gedek word, is tak-
sonomie, ekologie, anatomie en sitologie. Twee dele van die tydskrif en ’n
indeks van die inhoud, outeurs en onderwerpe verskyn jaarliks.
’n Inhoudsopgawe tot volumes 1-20 is beskikbaar.
MEMOIRS OF THE BOTANICAL SURVEY OF SOUTH AFRICA
The memoirs are individual treatises usually of an ecological nature, but
sometimes dealing with taxonomy or economic botany.
THE FLOWERING PLANTS OF AFRICA (FPA)
This serial presents colour plates of African plants with accompanying
text. The plates are prepared mainly by the artists at the National
Botanical Institute. Many well known botanical artists have contributed
to the series, such as Cythna Letty (over 700 plates), Kathleen Lansdell,
Stella Gower, Betty Connell, Peter Bally and Fay Anderson. The Editor
is pleased to receive living plants of general interest or of economic value
for illustration.
Twenty plates are published annually.
An index to Vols 1-49 is available.
FLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA (FSA)
A taxonomic treatise on the flora of the Republic of South Africa,
Ciskei, Transkei, Lesotho, Swaziland, Bophuthatswana, Namibia,
Botswana and Venda. The FSA contains descriptions of families, genera,
species, infraspecific taxa, keys to genera and species, synonymy, litera-
ture and limited specimen citations, as well as taxonomic and ecological
notes.
Contributions to the FSA will also appear in Bothalia.
PALAEOFLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA
A palaeoflora on a pattern comparable to that of the Flora of
southern Africa. Much of the information is presented in the form
of tables and photographic plates depicting fossil populations. Now
available:
’n Reeks van losstaande omvattende verhandelings oor vemaamlik eko-
logiese, maar soms ook taksonomiese of plantekonomiese onderwerpe.
Hierdie reeks bied kleurplate van Afrikaanse plante met bygaande teks.
Die skilderye word meestal deur die kunstenaars van die Nasionale
Botaniese Instituut voorberei. Talk bekende botaniese kunstenaars het
tot die reeks bygedra, soos Cythna Letty (meer as 700 plate), Kathleen
Lansdell, Stella Gower, Betty Connell, Peter Bally en Fay Anderson. Die
Redakteur verwelkom lewende plante van algemene belang of ekono-
miese waarde vir afbeelding.
Twintig plate word jaarliks gepubliseer.
’n Indeks tot volumes 1-49 is beskikbaar.
'n Taksonomiese verhandeling oor the flora van die Republiek van Suid-
Afrika, Ciskei, Transkei, Lesotho, Swaziland, Bophuthatswana, Namibie,
Botswana en Venda. Die FSA bevat beskrywings van families, genusse,
spesies, infraspesifieke taksons, sleutels tot genusse en spesies, sinonimie,
literatuur, verwysings na enkele eksemplare, asook beknopte taksonomiese
en ekologiese aantekeninge.
Bydraes tot die FSA sal ook in Bothalia verskyn.
'n Palaeoflora met ’n uitleg vergelykbaar met die van die Flora van
suidelike Afrika. Baie van die inligting word aangebied in die vorm van
tabelle en fotografiese plate waarop fossiele populasies afgebeeld word.
Rqeds beskikbaar:
Molteno Formation (Triassic) Vol. 1. Introduction. Dicroidium, by/deur J.M. & H.M. Anderson.
Molteno Formation (Triassic) Vol. 2. Gymnosperms (excluding Dicroidium ), by/deur J.M. & H.M. Anderson.
Prodromus of South African Megafloras. Devonian to Lower Cretaceous, by/deur J.M. & H.M. Anderson. Ob-
tainable from/Beskikbaar van: A. A. Balkema Marketing, Box/Posbus 317, Claremont 7735, RSA.
ANNALS OF KIRSTENBOSCH BOTANIC GARDENS
A series devoted to the publication of monographs and major works
on southern African flora. Published: Vol. 14-19 (earlier volumes
published as Supplementary volumes to the Journal of South African
Botany)
’n Reeks gewy aan die publikasie van monografiee en belangrike werke oor
flora van suidelike Afrika. Gepubliseer: vol. 14—19 (vroeere volumes
gepubliseer as Supplementary volumes van die Journal of South African
Botany).
BOTH ALIA
’N TYDSKRIF VIR PLANTKUNDIGE NAVORSING
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Volume 24,2
Scientific Editor/Wetenskaplike Redakteur: O.A. Leistner
Technical Editor/Tegniese Redakteur: B.A. Momberg
NASIONALE BOTANiESE
instituut
Private toag X101 PRETORIA 0001
1994 -11- ?0
X 101 PRETORIA 0001
riONAL BOTANICAL
INSTITUTE
INSTITUTE
2 Cussonia Avenue, Brummeria, Pretoria
Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001
ISSN 0006 8241
OctVOkt. 1994
Editorial Board/Redaksieraad
D.F. Cutler
B.J. Huntley
P.H. Raven
J.P. Rourke
M.J. Werger
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK
National Botanical Institute, Cape Town, RSA
Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, USA
Compton Herbarium, NBI, Cape Town, RSA
University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
CONTENTS— INHOUD
Volume 24,2
1. Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae) XV. The generic relationship between Erica and Ericinella. E.G.H.
OLIVER 121
2. A taxonomic re-assessment of Ammocharis herrei and Cybistetes longifolia (Amaryllideae: Amaryl-
lidaceae). D.A. SNIJMAN and G. WILLIAMSON 127
3. Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from southern Africa. 6. The genus Asterella (Aytoniaceae :
Reboulioideae) and its four local species. S.M. PEROLD 133
4. Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from southern Africa. 7. The genus Cryptomitrium (Aytoniaceae)
and C. oreades sp. nov. S.M. PEROLD 149
5. A new serotinous species of Cliff ortia (Rosaceae) from the southwestern Cape with notes on Clijfortia
arborea. E.G.H. OLIVER and A.C. FELLINGHAM 153
6. ESA contributions 1: Aquifoliaceae. S. ANDREWS 163
7. Notes on African plants:
Boraginaceae. Lobostemon regulareflorus — the correct name for L. grandiflorus. M.H. BUYS and
J.J.A. VAN DER WALT 170
Proteaceae. A new species of Leucospermum from the southwestern Cape. J.P. ROURKE 167
8. An overview of Aspergillus (Hyphomycetes) and associated teleomorphs in southern Africa. A. LOUISE
SCHUTTE 171
9. The taxonomic value of epidermal characters in the leaf of Heteromorpha and some related genera
(Apiaceae). P.J.D. WINTER and B-E. VAN WYK 187
10. Inflorescence morphology of Lachnaea and Cryptadenia (Thymelaeaceae). J.B.P. BEYERS and J.J.A.
VAN DER WALT 195
11. Morphological and ultrastructural variations in Schizaea pectinata (Schizaeaceae: Pteridophyta). B.M.
PARKINSON 203
12. Plant defences against mammalian herbivores: are juvenile Acacia more heavily defended than mature
trees? R. BROOKS and N. OWEN-SMITH 211
13. The saltmarsh vegetation of Langebaan Lagoon. M. O’CALLAGHAN 217
14. The saltmarsh vegetation of the lower Berg River. M. O’CALLAGHAN 223
15. The saltmarsh vegetation of the lower Uilkraals River. M. O'CALLAGHAN 229
16. The marsh vegetation of Kleinmond Lagoon. M. O’CALLAGHAN 235
17. Chromosome studies on African plants. 1 1. The tribe Andropogoneae (Poaceae: Panicoideae). J.J. SPIES,
T.H. TROSKIE, E. VAN DER V YVER and S.M.C. VAN WYK 241
18. National Botanical Institute: list of staff and publications, 3 1st March 1994. Compiler: B.A. MOMBERG 247
19. Book reviews 261
20. Guide for authors to Bothalia (including new provinces of South Africa, May 1994) 263
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2016
https://archive.org/details/bothaliavolume2424unse_0
Bothalia 24,2: 121-126 (1994)
Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae). XV. The generic relationship between
Erica and Ericinella
E.G.H. OLIVER*
Keywords: Africa, Blaeria , bract, bracteoles, Erica, Ericinella, Philippia, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
The small African genus Ericinella Klotzsch, with one species in Malawi and SW Tanzania and three in the Eastern Cape is
shown to exhibit variability in its delimiting characters that overlap with those of Blaeria L, and Philippia Klotzsch. both of
which have recently been included under Erica. It is postulated that the genus, like the two above, is unnatural and polyphyletic.
The genus is therefore included under Erica and the relevant nomenclatural changes are provided: Erica amatolensis E.G.H.
Oliv., nom. nov. (= Ericinella multiflora Klotzsch), E. passerinoides (Bolus) E.G.H. Oliv., comb, nov., E. hillhurttii (E.G.H.
Oliv.) E.G.H. Oliv., comb, nov., and E. microdonta (C.H. Wright) E.G.H. Oliv., comb. nov.
UITTREKSEL
Daar word aangetoon dat die klein Afrika-genus Ericinella Klotzsch, met een spesie in Malawi en SW Tanzanie en drie in
die oostelike Kaapprovinsie, variasie in sy afbakende kenmerke toon wat oorvleuel met die van Blaeria L. en Philippia
Klotzsch, wat albei onlangs onder Erica geplaas is. Die stelling word gemaak dat die genus, soos die twee hierbo, onnatuurlik
en polifileties is. Die genus word dus onder Erica geplaas en die nodige naamsveranderinge word gegee: Erica amatolensis
E.G.H. Oliv., nom. nov. (= Ericinella multiflora Klotzsch), E. passerinoides (Bolus) E.G.H. Oliv., comb, nov., E. hillhurttii
(E.G.H. Oliv.) E.G.H. Oliv., comb, nov., and E. microdonta (C.H. Wright) E.G.H. Oliv., comb. nov.
INTRODUCTION
The genus Ericinella Klotzsch belongs to the capsular
group of African genera of the subfamily Ericoideae
which until recently comprised Erica L., Philippia
Klotzsch, Blaeria L. and Ericinella. The genus Philippia
has been found (Oliver 1988) to possess a continuous
range of variation in the sole distinguishing character be-
tween the genera, the fully recaulescent bract in some
species, albeit only a few compared to the 757 species in
Erica. Also it was argued that the genus was not a
monophyletic unit. The genus was therefore reduced to
synonymy under Erica (Oliver 1987, 1992, 1993a;
Beentje 1990). As a result, the circumscription of Erica
became broader with the inclusion of those Philippia spp.
with stamen complements differing from the basic eight
stamens in most Erica spp. The most aberrant species of
this group is the tropical Erica nyassana (Aim & T.C.E.
Fr.) E.G.H. Oliv. [= Philippia nyassana Aim & T.C.E. Fr.]
with only four stamens.
The situation regarding the validity of Blaeria as a dis-
tinct genus was also examined in the light of its single
character difference from Erica of four versus eight
stamens. It has been shown (Oliver 1993b) that several
species of Erica , apart from those incorporated from
Philippia , showed an overlap in the number of stamens.
As in the case of Philippia it was shown that polyphyletic
origins exist for the various species groups currently in-
cluded within the genus Blaeria. As a result, the genus
*Stellenbosch Herbarium, National Botanical Institute, RO. Box 471,
Stellenbosch 7599.
MS. received: 1993-03-03.
Blaeria was reduced to synonymy under Erica (Oliver
1993b, 1993c).
ERICINELLA
This genus was described together with many other
genera by Klotzsch (1838) in his reclassification of the
subfamily Ericoideae. It was based on one species, E. mul-
tiflora Klotzsch, and was distinguished from other mem-
bers of the subfamily by a fully recaulescent bract, the
zygomorphic calyx condition, and no bracteoles coupled
with only four stamens and a 3-locular ovary. The sub-
sequent describing of Ericinella gracilis Benth. from
Madagascar (Bentham 1839) altered the circumscription
of the genus to include a 4-locular ovary. This was com-
pounded by the adding of E. mannii Hook. f. from tropical
Africa in 1862.
This broader circumscription of the genus was main-
tained by various workers in their publications for overall
treatments of the family or for large floras (Bentham 1839;
D. Oliver 1877; Drude 1897; Brown 1905).
When Aim & Fries (1927a) undertook the first com-
plete revision of the genus, they retained only three
species, the two Cape ones, E. multiflora and E. pas-
serinoides, and one from tropical Africa, E. microdonta
(C.H. Wright) Aim & T.C.E. Fr., which had originally
been described as a species of Blaeria. They purified the
genus by removing what to them were the two discordant
elements to Philippia, P. tenuissima Klotzsch (E. gracilis )
and P. mannii (Hook, f.) Aim & T.C.E. Fr..
122
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
Phillips (1926) retained the genus as circumscribed in
Flora capensis (Brown 1905) in his The genera of South
African flowering plants, but later (Phillips 1944) com-
pletely changed his concept of the subfamily. In this work
he combined Ericinella with a number of genera not all
closely related, namely Philippia, Coccospernia Klotzsch
and Thamnus Klotzsch, under Blaeria L. He retained this
treatment in the second edition of The genera ... (Phillips
1951). The genus was retained in the same form as used
by Aim & Fries (Oliver 1975) and by Ross (1983) in
Flora zambesiaca with the single species, E. microdonta.
As currently construed Ericinella is a small genus with
the one species, E. microdonta, in tropical Africa and the
three species, E. multiflora, E. passerinoides and E.
hillburttii, in the Eastern Cape. It is distinguished only by
a combination of two characters, the fully recaulescent
bract and four stamens.
The fully recaulescent bract is present in a number of
Cape genera such as Salaxis Salisb., Coccospernia
Klotzsch, Scyphogyne Decne and Nagelocarpus Bullock,
but these minor genera have an indehiscent fruit. It is also
present in the philippioid components now included
within Erica.
Aim & Fries (1924) and Ross (1957) relied on anther
appendages and the shape of the stigma to distinguish
Ericinella from Philippia. These characters are clearly not
of any significance in generic delimitation because they
are only a reflection of the different pollination syndromes
present in the taxa — entomophily versus anemophily, both
of which are present in many species of Erica. It has been
pointed out (Rebelo et al. 1985; Koutnik 1987; Oliver
1991) that the reduction in flower size, loss of bright
colours and the increase in size of the stigma is associated
with anemophily in the southern African Ericaceae. To
this must be added the loss of anther appendages.
The only difference existing between Ericinella and
Blaeria in tropical Africa is the fully recaulescent bract
and lack of bracteoles in the former genus. However, Ross
(1980) stated that the bract can be inserted anywhere from
near the base of the pedicel to close under the calyx in
the tropical species of Blaeria [Erica] and that bracteoles
are only present when the bract is inserted at or below
the middle of the pedicel. This would then give the con-
dition of a partially recaulescent bract and no bracteoles
which does occur in some specimens of E. microdonta
that I have examined.
Ericinella microdonta has a 4-locular ovary, whereas
the three Cape species of Ericinella have 3-locular, very
rarely 4-locular ovaries. The very variable Cape species.
Erica equisetifolia Salisb. [Blaeria equisetifolia (Salisb.)
Druce, Blaeria dumosa Wendl., Blaeria campanulata
Benth.] possesses Bowers with 66% having 3-locular
ovaries in the localized montane form [Blaeria cam-
panulata]. The 3-locular condition is not confined to the
above species; it occurs occasionally in the widespread
tropical species Erica mannii (Hook, f.) Beentje and of
course the Madagascan species, Philippia gracilis (Benth.)
H. Perrier [Ericinella gracilis Benth.) mentioned above.
Also Aim & Fries (1927a) had created the subgenus
Afrophilippia to accommodate two East African species
with 3-merous flowers, P. excelsa Aim & T.C.E. Fr. [Erica
excelsa (Aim & T.C.E. Fr.) Beentje] and P. johnstonii
Engl, [still to be transferred to Erica].
DISCUSSION
In the discussion of the African capsular genera (Oliver
1988) it was stated that the relationships within this group
of genera are very close, with generic distinctions being
based on the flimsiest of morphological characters. This
would indicate that the genera have arisen from some an-
cestral ericoid stock by two processes: the shifting of the
bract and bracteoles from axial and partially recaulescent
to totally recaulescent; and by the reduction in stamen
number from 8 to 4. Both processes were involved in the
formation of the species placed under Ericinella, whereas
in Philippia, the first and in Blaeria the second process
has taken place.
Ross (1957) did not consider the possibility of any
close link existing between Philippia and Ericinella, in-
stead he regarded them as belonging to two separate
evolutionary lines in which the zygomorphic calyx,
produced by the totally recaulescent bract, has risen in-
dependently.
Aim & Fries (1924) when considering the phylogenetic
origins of the genera Philippia and Ericinella, were unable
to give any clear lineage for Ericinella from either Philip-
pia or Blaeria. They regarded E. microdonta as an outlier
of the genus whose origin lay in the region of the Cape
Flora.
These arguments are perhaps feasible if one accepts
Ericinella as a natural, well-defined genus. The tropical
species shows a clear relationship with the tropical species
of Erica that have been placed in the Section Arsace (Aim
& T.C.E. Fr. 1927b), Erica arborea L. and the complex
of six species included by Ross (1956) under E. kingaensis
Engl, as three subspecies. These ericas exhibit reductions
in their bract/calyx arrangement and in the number of
stamens. They all clearly arose from some ericoid an-
cestral stock independently of those much further south
in the Cape Province.
There is little doubt that the three Cape species are
closely related, but not to the tropical species, E.
microdonta. The Cape species are allied to several Eastern
Cape-KwaZulu/Natal species of Erica which are placed
in the section Arsace in the present, rather unsatisfactory,
subgeneric classification of the genus. These are Erica
dominans Killick, E. dissimulans Hilliard & B.L. Burtt
and E. anomala Hilliard & B.L. Burtt. E. dissimulans and
E. anomala both show a strong tendency towards the
philippioid reduced calyx. The former species also pos-
sesses 3-4-locular ovaries as does E. dominans, characters
which have not previously been recorded in the species.
There is also a relationship with the southeastern Cape
species complex based on Erica simulans Dulfer, which
is placed in the section Pyronium. In my opinion the genus
Ericinella, as it stands, is an unnatural one which is clearly
not monophyletic.
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
123
The clear and total overlap in the morphological char-
acters of partial versus total recaulescence of the bract,
the four stamens and 3- to 4-locular ovary indicates that
there can be no separation between the species currently
included under Ericinella and those which were formerly
in Philippia and Blaeria and are now included within
Erica. This fact coupled with the independent origin of
the two groups of species have led me to reduce the genus
to synonymy under Erica.
SPECIES & NOMENCLATURAL CHANGES
1. Erica amatolensis E.G.H. Oliv., nom. nov.
Ericinella multiflora Klotzsch in Linnaea 12: 223 (1838), non Erica
multiflora L. (1753) species mediterranea; Benth.: 697 (1839); N.E. Br.:
318 (1905); Aim & T.C.E. Fr. : 45 (1927a). Type: Winterberg near
Philippstown (ceded Territory), Ecklon & Zeyher s.n. (B, holo.f : BOL!,
K!, LD!, P!, UPS!, Z! iso.); ibid., distributed as Ecklon & Zeyher 257
(G!, MEL!, PRE!, S !, SAM!, W!). Lectotype (selected here): Ecklon &
Zeyher 257 [det. Klotzsch) (S).
Erica amatolensis is most closely related to the more
recently described E. passerinoides and E. hillburttii under
which the differences are discussed. These differences are
summarised in Table 1.
This species is restricted to the higher mountains of
the Eastern Cape Province from the Katberg along the
Amatola Range to Stutterheim (Figure 1). It forms erect
single-stemmed shrubs up to 1.5 m tall on the edges of
forest patches or among woody vegetation on rocky gras-
sy slopes from 1 000-1 600 m altitude and flowers from
October to December.
It is the most widespread of the three Cape species
discussed here, but does not appear to be abundant where
it does occur. For instance on the Katberg Pass, where
most records have been made due to easy access, the
plants are few and far between. Over its range there does
not appear to be any variation of significance in the char-
FIGURE 1. — Distribution of the Cape species; E. passerinoides , •; E.
amatolensis , #; E. hillburttii, ■.
acters. Occasionally, however, some anthers were noted
without any appendages.
McMasters (pers. comm.) noted that the bushes in the
Gubu Dam area near Stutterheim were inclined to have a
running root system from which new plants were
produced. This could well indicate that these plants may
survive burning by sprouting from the root system. This
would then relate to the condition found in E. hillburttii
with its thick woody rootstock and many stems above
ground. All the plants that I have seen in the wild pos-
sessed a single stem with regeneration having to take place
via seeds only.
The flowers have very rudimentary nectaries at the
base of the ovary and only a slightly obconic stigma.
Anemophily was clearly evident in the populations on the
Katberg Pass where clouds of pollen were produced when
TABLE 1. — Characters which distinguish the three Cape species of Erica
124
Bothalia 24,2 ( 1994)
the plants were disturbed. It is surprising therefore that
the flowers are a striking pink colour and that the exserted
anthers often have appendages, features which are as-
sociated with entomophily. Insects in the form of bees
foraging for pollen only, could perhaps play a minor role
in the pollination of this species.
The holotype, Ecklon & Zeyher s.n., was destroyed in
Berlin during World War II, and so it was decided to select
the numbered collection in Stockholm as the lectotype
because it was determined by Klotzsch himself.
Specimens examined
Cotterrell 39 (BOL, GRA); Ecklon & Zeyher 257 (G, MEL, PRE, S,
SAM, W) & s.n. (BOL, K, LD, P, UPS, Z); Esterhuysen 13226 (BOL,
NBG, PRE), 13257 (BOL); Hilliard & B.L. Bunt 10997 (PRE), 12369.
12396 (NU. PRE); McMasters 8. 70 (STE); Oliver 7967 (PRE, STE),
8066 (BM, E, MO, PRE, STE); Rattray 101. 350 (GRA), in BOL 14244
(BOL); Sidey 3787 (PRE, S, STE); Werdermann & Oberdieck 1070
(PRE).
2. Erica passerinoides (Bolus) E.G.H. Oliv., comb.
nov.
Ericinella passerinoides Bolus in Journal of the Linnean Society of
London, Botany 18: 393 (1881); N.E. Br.: 318 (1905); Alm& T.C.E. Fr.:
46 (1927a). Type: Sneeuberg, Koudeveld Mtns, 5000 ft, Dec. 1872, Bolus
2582 (BOL!, holo.; G!. K!, LD!, SAM!, iso.).
The true identity of E. passerinoides remains a problem
as the type and only collection does not have fully mature
flowers. Thus the true shape of the corolla, the position
of the anthers at anthesis and the position of the mature
style and stigma cannot be assessed. Fortunately an old
capsule remaining from the previous flowering season, al-
though somewhat disintegrated, could be used to
reconstruct the characters of the fruit.
Bolus’s diaries for that period do not give sufficient
details to pinpoint the exact locality. He appears to have
collected en route from Graaff-Reinet to Murraysburg,
presumably not far off the road. Several searches in the
area of the highest point of the road over the Sneeuberg
and environs to the north and south have proved unsuc-
cessful. Another species of Ericaceae, Philippia tristis
Bolus (= Erica caespitosa Hilliard & B.L. Burtt), also
known from its type collection gathered at the same
locality on the same day, has not been re-collected in that
vicinity either. As farms now stretch right to the summit
of these mountains where burning and overgrazing are
very evident, it is likely that both species have been ex-
terminated in the area.
Aim & Fries (1927a) retained the species with some
hesitation as they felt that it was only a young stage of
E. amatolensis (E. multiflora). However, a thorough ex-
amination of the type has revealed a number of characters
which point to the distinctness of E. passerinoides from
E. amatolensis (see Table 1). Brown (1905) used the
corolla shape and degree of exsertion of the style to
separate the two Cape species. Aim & Fries on the other
hand used the shape of the calyx lobes and leaf length to
separate them. These characters are of no real value in
distinguishing the species.
Until the material is found again in the wild I am
retaining E. passerinoides as a distinct species.
Specimen examined
Bolus 2582 (BOL, G, K, LD, SAM).
3. Erica hillburttii (E.G.H. Oliv.) E.G.H. Oliv.,
comb. nov.
Ericinella hillburttii E.G.H. Oliv. in Bothalia 16: 46 (1986). Type:
Cape, Elliott Dist., Bastervoetpad between Saamwerk and Mt Enterprise,
2 130 m, 16 November 1983, Oliver 8151 (PRE, holo.!, BM!, BOL!, E!,
GRA!, K!, MO!, NBG!, NU!, NY!, S!, STE! iso.).
This species forms erect multi-stemmed shrubs up to
1.5 m tall and occurs on rocky, grassy slopes at high al-
titude in the mountains northwest of Elliott in the Eastern
Cape. It flowers from October to December.
E. hillburttii was discovered as recently as 1983 by
Hilliard & Burtt. It is known to date from only one
locality, the Bastervoetpad. Accessibility in these moun-
tains is very limited, therefore additional populations
could well be discovered in the future farther north
towards Naude’s Nek.
The species is easily distinguishable from its nearest
ally, E. amatolensis , on a number of characters (Table 1 ).
The most noticeable of these characters in the field are
the multi-stemmed habit, greenish yellow colour of the
flowers and the included stamens. Examination of a
flower will show the relatively short filaments with broad
apex on which the awns are decurrent and the lanate
ovary.
The total lack of any nectaries below the ovary, the
broadly funnel-shaped stigma and the inconspicuous dull-
coloured flowers clearly point to anemophily in this
species. This syndrome could not be tested in the field
because of the wet overcast weather prevailing when the
type material was collected.
Specimens examined
Hilliard & B.L. Burtt 16662 (STE); Oliver 8151 (BM, BOL, E, GRA,
K, MO, NBG, NU, PRE, S, STE).
4. Erica microdonta (C.H. Wright ) E.G.H. Oliv.,
comb. nov.
Ericinella microdonta (C.H. Wright) Aim & T.C.E. Fr. in Acta Horti
Bergiani 8: 262 (1924); Aim & T.C.E. Fr.: 46 (1927a); Brenan: 494
(1954); R. Ross: 174 (1983). Blaeria microdonta C.H. Wright: 272
(1897). Types: Malawi, Mla'nje Distr., Mt Mlanje, I 800 m, McClounie
55. 75 & 95 ( K ! ). Lectotype (selected here by R. Ross pers. comm.):
McClounie 55 (K).
E. shinniae S. Moore: 287 (1916). Type: Malawi, Mlanje Dist. Shinn
s.n. (BM!, holo.).
E. brassii Brenan: 494 (1954). Type: Malawi, Mlanje Dist. Mlanje
Mtn, Luchenya Plateau, 1 870 m, June 1946, Brass 16454 (K!, holo.;
BM!, MO!, PRE!, SRGH, iso.).
E. microdonta var. craspedotricha Brenan: 495 (1954). Type: Mala-
wi, Mlanje Dist., Mlanje Mtn, southwest ridge, 2 400 m, June 1946, Brass
16497 (K!, holo.; MO!, PRE!, SRGH, iso.).
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
125
This species is from tropical Africa where it occurs
mostly on high ground in Malawi, just getting into SW
Tanzania (Figure 2). Ross (1983) recorded the species as
forming shrubs up to 3 m tall. Brass, on his various col-
lections, records the plants as occasional to plentiful,
sometimes gregarious, in grassland on the edges of rain-
forest and on rocky banks of streams subject to flooding.
One plant he recorded as a tree 4 m tall. I can confirm
these observations from my examination of plants on Mt
Mulanje.
Of the species listed here E. microdonta is by far the
most variable. The populations in central Africa were
regarded as comprising two distinct species, one with a
variety (Brenan 1954). The variation in the size and form
of the corolla is considerable, the smallest flowers being
from the type of E. brcissii Brenan and appearing very
distinct. However, Ross ( 1983) after examining a consid-
erable number of specimens from the whole area regarded
the variation in the indumentum on the branchlets, leaf
indumentum, leaf size, corolla size and stigma diameter
as of no taxonomic significance. He recognized only one
species with no varieties, and this view I support.
E. microdonta possesses well-developed nectaries
below the ovary, a poorly developed funnel-shaped stigma
and partially exserted anthers with appendages. This
would clearly indicate entomophily as the pollination
syndrome. During a visit to a few populations on Mt
Mulanje in Malawi during 1991, I was unable to record
any instance of the mass scattering of pollen from the
white flowers, but noted no visitation by any insect.
In correspondence some time ago on the lectotypifica-
tion of this species, which had not been done for Flora
zambesiaca , Ross recommended that McClounie 55 was
the best specimen to select. I therefore attribute the above
selection to him.
FIGURE 2. — Distributions of the species; E. passerinoides, •; E.
amatolensis, ★; E. hillburttii, ■; E. microdonta , ©.
Specimens examined
Brass 16416, 16446, 16454 (MO, PRE), 16502 (MO), 16770 (MO,
PRE), 16852 (MO, PRE); Goodier 269 (PRE), 289 (PRE); Goyns 45a
(PRE); Oliver 9816 (STE); Phipps 2787 (PRE).
REFERENCES
ALM, G. & FRIES, T.C.E. 1924. Monographic tier Gattung Blaeria L.
Acta Horti Bergiani 8: 223-261.
ALM, G. & FRIES, T.C.E. 1927a. Monographic der Gattungen Philippia
Klotzsch, Mitrastylus gen. nov. und Ericinella Klotzsch.
Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar Ser. 3, 4,4:
1-19.
ALM. G. & FRIES, T.C.E. 1927b. Die tropischen Arten der Gattung
Erica L. Arkiv for botanik 21A,7: 1-21.
BEENTJE, H. 1990. Name changes in East African Ericaceae. Utafiti 3,1:
13.
BENTHAM, G. 1839. Ericaceae. In A.P De Candolle, Prodromus sys-
tematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 7: 580-733. Paris.
BOLUS, H. 1881. Ericinella passerinoides. Journal of the Linnean
Society of London, Botany 18: 393.
BRENAN, PM. 1954. Plants collected by the Vemay Nyasaland Expedi-
tion of 1946 (continued). Memoirs of the New York Botanical
Garden 8: 409-510.
BROWN, N.E. 1905. Ericaceae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora capensis
4,1: 315-336. Reeve, Ashford.
DRUDE, O. 1897. Ericoideae-Ericaceae. In H.G.A. Engler & K.A.E.
Prantl, Die Natiirlichen Pflanzenfamilien 4, 1 : 57-65. Engelmann,
Leipzig.
HOOKER, J.D. 1862. Ericinella mannii. Journal of the Linnean Society
of London, Botany 6: 16.
KLOTZSCH. J.F. 1838. Ericearum, genera et species. Linnaea 12: 211 —
247.
KOUTNIK, D. 1987. Wind pollination in the Cape flora. In A.G. Rebelo,
A preliminary synthesis of pollination biology in the Cape flora:
126-133. South African National Scientific Programmes Report
No. 141.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum edn 1,1: 355.
MOORE. S. 1916. Ericinella shinniae. Journal of Botany, London 54:
287.
OLIVER, D. 1877. Flora of tropical Africa: 482-485. Reeve, London.
OLIVER, E.G.H. 1975. Ericaceae. In R.A. Dyer, The genera of southern
African flowering plants 1: 429-439. Botanical Research In-
stitute, Pretoria.
OLIVER. E.G.H. 1986. A new species of Ericinella from the southern
Drakensberg. Bothalia 16: 46-48.
OLIVER, E.G.H. 1987. Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae). VII. The
placing of the genus Philippia into synonymy under Erica: the
southern African species. South African Journal of Botany 53:
455-458.
OLIVER. E.G.H. 1988. Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae). VI. The
generic relationship between Erica and Philippia in southern
Africa. Bothalia 18: 1—10.
OLIVER. E.G.H. 1989. The Ericoideae and the southern African
heathers. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 101: 319-327.
OLIVER, E.G.H. 1991. The Ericoideae (Ericaceae) — a review. Contribu-
tions from the Bolus Herbarium 13: 158-208.
OLIVER, E.G.H. 1992. Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae). VIII. New
combinations for Philippia are made in Erica for the Flora zam-
besiaca region. Kew Bulletin 47: 665-668.
OLIVER. E.G.H. 1993a. Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae). X.
Nomenclatural changes for the Flore des Mascareignes region.
Kew Bulletin 48: 767-769.
OLIVER. E.G.H. 1993b. Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae). XI. The
generic relationship between Erica and Blaeria. Kew Bulletin 48:
771-780.
OLIVER, E.G.H. 1993c. Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae). XII. The
placing of the genus Blaeria into synonymy under Erica,
nomenclatural and taxonomic changes for the southern African
region. Bothalia 23: 1-7.
PHILLIPS, E.P 1926. The genera of South African flowering plants, 1st
edn: 457—4-65. Division of Botany and Plant Pathology, Pretoria.
PHILLIPS, E.P. 1944. Notes on the minor genera of the Ericaceae.
Journal of South African Botany 10: 69-73.
126
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
PHILLIPS, E.P. 1951. The genera of South African flowering plants , 2nd
edn: 558-562. Division of Botany and Plant Pathology, Pretoria.
REBELO, A.G.. SIEGFRIED, W.R. & OLIVER, E.G.H. 1985. Pollina-
tion syndromes of Erica species in the southwestern Cape. South
African Jounutl of Botany 51: 270-280.
ROSS, R. 1956. On some African tree heathers. Annals and magazine of
natural history 9: 89-96.
ROSS, R. 1957. Notes on Philippia. Bulletin du Jardin Botanique de
l 'Etat, Bruxelles 27 : 733-754.
ROSS, R. 1980. Notes on Ericaceae from the Flora zambesiaca region.
Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana, Ser. 2, 53: 123-149.
ROSS, R. 1983. Ericaceae. Flora zambesiaca 7,1: 157-181.
WRIGHT, C.H. 1897. Diagnoses africanae. Kew Bulletin 1897: 272.
Bothalia 24,2: 127-132(1994)
A taxonomic re-assessment of Ammocharis herrei and Cybistetes longifolia
(Amaiyllideae : Amaryllidaceae)
D.A. SNIJMAN* and G. WILLIAMSON**
Keywords: Amaryllidaceae, Ammocharis herrei , anemogeochory, Cybistetes longifolia, seed number, seed size, synonymy
ABSTRACT
The inlructescence of the poorly known Ammocharis herrei F.M. Leight. is similar to that which is diagnostic for Cybistetes
longifolia (L.) Milne-Redh. & Schweick. In the absence of distinct morphological differences A. herrei is placed into synonymy
under C. longifolia. Plants of the amplified C. longifolia have fewer, large seeds in Namaqualand and the Richtersveld and
smaller, more numerous seeds in the Western Cape. This pattern is postulated to reflect divergent strategies of resource
allocation in different habitats. It is suggested that the infructescence of C. longifolia , a highly derived structure suited to
tumbling, evolved from the unspecialised condition in Ammocharis as an adaptation to the high winds of southwestern Africa.
UITTREKSEL
Die vrugstadiumbloeiwyse van die betreklik onbekende Ammocharis herrei F.M. Leight. is soortgelyk aan die wat
diagnostics is vir Cybistetes longifolia (L.) Milne-Redh. & Schweick. In die afwesigheid van duidelike morfologiese verskille,
word A. herrei in sinonimie onder C. longifolia geplaas. Plante van die vergrote C. longifolia het minder, groot sade in
Namakwaland en die Richtersveld en kleiner, meer sade in die Wes-Kaap. Die veronderstelling word gemaak dat hierdie patroon
uiteenlopende strategies van hulpbrontoewysing in verskillende habitats weerspieel. Daar word voorgestel dat die
vrugstadiumbloeiwyse van C. longifolia, ’n hoogs afgeleide struktuur wat kan rol, van die ongespesialiseerde toestand by
Ammocharis as ’n aanpassing by die sterk winde van suidwestelike Afrika ontwikkel het.
INTRODUCTION
The monotypic Cybistetes Milne-Redh. & Schweick.
is a Western Cape representative of Amaryllidaceae tribe
Amaryllideae with a specialised infructescence in which
the pedicels elongate, spread apart, stiffen and ultimately
radiate equally in all directions. Its separation from the
widely distributed sub-Saharan Ammocharis Herb, was
based on the interpretation of Milne-Redhead & Schweick-
erdt (1939) that the pedicels of the infructescence and the
dry, strongly ribbed capsules constitute a substantially dis-
tinct set of characters from the basic infructescence struc-
ture of Ammocharis in which the pedicels neither reflex
nor elongate and the fruits remain submembranous and
subglobose. This treatment, however, rendered uncertain
the taxonomic position of A. herrei F.M. Leight. whose
fruits have remained unknown until now.
Even in the absence of fruiting material, Milne-Red-
head & Schweickerdt (1939) commented on the close
resemblance of the type of A. herrei to the Western Cape
species, C. longifolia (L.) Milne-Redh. & Schweick. They
noted differences, however, in inflorescence characters
and ovule numbers.
Several recent collections of Amaryllidaceae from the
Richtersveld in the Northern Cape Province match the type
of A. herrei , which consists of leaves and an inflorescence
from a bulb originally collected by H. Herre south of Kom-
* Compton Herbarium, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X7,
Claremont 7735.
** P.O. Box 406, Alexander Bay, 8290.
MS. received: 1993-09-17.
maggas, Namaqualand in the Northern Cape Province and
later cultivated at the Stellenbosch University Garden. The
position and status of this taxon are re-assessed and the
current data on the fruits and seeds of Cybistetes are dis-
cussed.
INFRUCTESCENCE, INFLORESCENCE AND
OVULE NUMBER
The new infructescence data given here were taken
from three recent collections of Amaryllidaceae from the
Richtersveld [Van Jaarsveld et al. 3511 (NBG, PRE), G.
& F. Williamson 4626 (K, MO, NBG, PRE) and G. & F.
Williamson 4637 (NBG, PRE)]. They augment the pre-
viously collected flowering data of A. herrei from the
same area [ Hall 592 (NBG), Williamson 2943, 2944 and
Williamson & Gassner 2925 (BOL)]. This new material
has roughly spherical, stiff, infructescences with long
pedicels and dry indehiscent capsules (Figure IB. C).
These characters fully match those diagnostic for Cybis-
tetes and clearly align the material with this genus.
Milne-Redhead & Schweickerdt (1939) had noted that
in A. herrei the number of flowers per umbel is greater,
the pedicels are longer and the number of ovules (2-4)
per locule is smaller than is usual for C. longifolia (8-19).
These differences are reduced, however, by the subsequent
collections of Hall 1081 and Snijman 435, 1314 at NBG &
PRE, from near Vanrhynsdoip. Observations based on all
the available material at BOL, NBG, PRE and STE show
that plants of C. longifolia from the south have 13-40-
flowered umbels and pedicels up to 100-210 mm long;
those from further north near Vanrhynsdorp have 35-47-
128
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
FIGURE I . — Cybistetes longifulia on the alluvial plains of the Orange River, Richtersveld. A, solitary bulb with two inflorescences; B, developing
infructescence showing damage by a snout beetle (Brachycerus sp.); C, dispersed infructescence having released its seeds through tumbling;
D, leaves withering back after a short growth flush in February.
flowered umbels and pedicels up to 125-175 mm long;
whereas the Richtersveld plants from yet further north,
have 37-90 flowers per umbel and pedicels up to 100-150
mm long. Data on variation in ovule number in plants
from throughout the range are lacking but differences in
the abundance of seed per capsule from plants within the
Western Cape, near Vanrhynsdorp and the Northern Cape
in the Richtersveld support the observations of Milne-
Redhead & Schweickerdt (1939) on divergent ovule num-
bers from plants (Table 1 ). Infructescences collected near
Vanrhynsdorp and Namaqualand have a greater maximum
number of seeds per capsule than the fruiting material
collected in the Richtersveld. The capsules from the south
also tend to be longer and narrower than those in the north
(Figure 2). The differences, however, are not discrete and
the increase in seed number per capsule from the north
to the south appears to be continuous. There is also an
inverse relationship between seed size and seed number
per capsule within the species’ distribution range (Table
1 ). Thus plants in the Richtersveld and Namaqualand tend
to have especially large seeds (up to 29 mm across)
whereas the seeds of those in the south are smaller (7-19
mm across) (Figure 2). Seed size within a capsule is
nevertheless variable throughout the distribution range.
DISCUSSION
In the absence of any vegetative, floral or clearly dis-
continuous fruiting characters to distinguish A. herrei from
the variable C. longifolia, we propose that A. herrei is
conspeciftc with C. longifolia (L.) Milne-Redh. & Schweick.
but that plants of C. longifolia produce few, large seeds in
TABLE 1 . — Seed number and seed size in individual plants of Cybistetes longifolia throughout the distribution range
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
129
FIGURE 2. — Variation in size of capsules and seeds of Cybistetes longifolia. A, disintegrating capsule revealing many seeds from Gordon's Bay,
Western Cape (Duncan s.n.); B, seed from Gordon’s Bay (Duncan s.n.): C, capsules and seed from Beauvallon, Richtersveld (Williamson
4637); D, large seed from Annisrivier, Richtersveld ( Williamson 4639). Scale bars: 10 mm.
the semi-arid environments of the Richtersveld and Nama-
qualand, and many, relatively small seeds in the more equ-
able south. Accordingly A. herrei is treated here as a
synonym of C. longifolia.
As regards the comparative biology of individuals
within the amplified C. longifolia , the most noteworthy
variables are seed size and seed number. According to
Harper et. al. (1970) and Stebbins (1974) seed size and
seed number represent alternative strategies in the disposi-
tion of reproductive resources. However, due to divergent
and often conflicting advantages and disadvantages of
seed size versus seed number, most plant species have
evolved compromise strategies which depend on various
conditions of their habitat as well as their evolutionary
ancestry (Stebbins 1974). In the Richtersveld the annual
vegetative growth period of C. longifolia is often more
variable and shorter than that of plants in the Western
Cape whose foliage leaves are green for five to six months
throughout the winter rainfall season. The fleshy seeds of
C. longifolia, which germinate immediately after being
shed in autumn, are potentially susceptible to desiccation
injury before the onset of winter rain. Thus within the
constraints of the restricted and unpredictable growing
season for C. longifolia in the semi-arid Richtersveld and
Namaqualand the selection of large seeds, which have op-
timal reserves for their initial growth, appears to have been
favoured at the expense of seed numbers. In contrast, the
more reliable growing season of the Western Cape may
have promoted the selection of large seed numbers over
seed size to increase the probability that some seeds lodge
in suitably open habitats amongst the otherwise densely
vegetated communities of this region.
In several evolutionary lines Stebbins (1970) observed
the transference of function of a particular structure. A
notable example is the functional shift in the fruit wall
from that of providing protection for developing ovules
to one of effecting the dispersal of mature seeds. This
pattern is paralleled in Ammocharis and Cybistetes whose
indehiscent fruit walls initially protect the fleshy seeds
during development, but thereafter effect divergent disper-
sal strategies.
The lax infructescences of Ammocharis, which favours
seasonally moist habitats, initially elongate then flop to
the ground, releasing their seeds close to the parent plants.
In contrast, the indehiscent fruits of Cybistetes, which in-
habits open, dry situations, become dry, rigid capsules,
that radiate outward to form a sphere which then tumbles
in the wind (Markotter 1936; Martley 1938; Milne-Red-
head & Schweickerdt 1939) (Figure 1C). Following the
concept of transference of function (Stebbins 1974), it is
postulated that the basic protective function of the fruits
has shifted to include a derived dispersive function in
Cybistetes, where the entire infructescence serves as the
unit of dispersal. Clearly, the specialised infructescence
characters defined by Milne-Redhead & Schweickerdt
(1939) as separating Cybistetes from Ammocharis are
highly integrated and functionally interrelated to effect
dispersal by tumbling (anemogeochory of Van der Pijl
1982). It does not seem unlikely that this syndrome of
characters evolved from a most recent common ancestor
within Ammocharis as an adaptation to the high winds of
the Western Cape which probably date from the inception
of its Mediterranean-type climate in the Late Pliocene
(Deacon et al. 1992; Tankard & Rogers 1978). This in-
130
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
terpretation suggests that Ammocharis sensu Milne-Red-
head & Schweickerdt (1939) is paraphyletic and that the
current classification of Cybistetes and Ammocharis war-
rants re-examination. Evidence of this, however, awaits a
phylogenetic analysis of all the species in the generic com-
plex and a character analysis of the closely related and
variable genus Crinum L.
In Amaryllideae anemogeochory is also known in
Boophane Herb, and Brunsvigia Heist. In most taxa the
infructescences detach at ground level and roll away in
the wind with the scape intact. The scape, which ap-
proximates the length of the radiating pedicels in most
species, appears to confer symmetry on the infructescence,
a configuration which Maddox & Carlquist (1985) have
shown ranks highly in tumbling ability. Boophane disticha
(L. f.) Herb, and Boophane haemanthoides F.M. Leight.
are exceptional in having infructescences which detach
from the scape distally. The resultant dispersal unit lacks
symmetry and appears to lose its integrity rapidly. These
observations suggest that Cybistetes, Boophane and
Brunsvigia offer interesting possibilities for experimental
studies in wind dispersal.
Cybistetes longifolia (L.) Milne -Redh. & Schweick.
in Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 52: 192
(1939); Adamson & T.M. Salter: 211 (1950). Type: figure
in P. Herm., Paradisus batavus: t. 195 (1698), lecto.!, here
designated.
Amaryllis longifolia L.: 293 (1753). Crinum longifolium (L.)Thunb.:
59 (1794) pro parte, excl. descr. Ammocharis longifolia (L.) M. Roem.:
62 (1847).
Crinum falcatum Jacq.: 34, t. 60 ( 1 776). Amaryllisfalcata ( Jacq. ) L’ Her. :
13 (‘1788’, 1789). Haemanthus falcatus (Jacq.) Thunb.: 58 (1794).
Brunsvigia falcata (Jacq.) Ker Gawl.: t. 1443 (1812). Ammocharis falcata
(Jacq.) Herb.: 17 ( 1821 ); Baker: 96 (1888); Baker: 204 ( 1896) pro parte
(excluding Ammocharis coranica Herb. & Amaryllis coranica Burchell).
Type: figure in Jacq., Hortus botanicus vindobonensis 3: t. 60 (1776), lecto. !,
designated here.
Amaryllis coranica var. pallida Lindl. (sphalm. Burchell) sec.
Markotter: 13 (1936), non Lindl.: t. 1219 (1829).
Ammocharis herrei F.M. Leight.: 110 (1932), syn. nov. Type: South
Africa, Namaqualand, 60 miles S of Kommaggas, fl. ex hort. Stellenbosch,
April 1931, Herre sub SUG 3072 (BOL, holo.!).
Bulb solitary, ovoid to globose, 100-150 mm across,
extended into a neck up to 60 mm long, entirely subter-
ranean; outer tunics dark brown, tough and leathery; inner
tunics fleshy, cream-coloured. Leaves present or absent at
anthesis, 9-14, biflabellately arranged, spreading, strap-
shaped, more or less falcate, variable in length and width,
with the inner narrower and shorter than the outer, 6-270
x 13-55 mm, glaucous, smooth; margins scarious,
obscurely toothed or entire; apex truncate in mature
leaves, obtuse in young leaves. Inflorescence 1 3^-90-
flowered, ranging from somewhat clustered to widely
spreading, 150-340 mm across; scape erect, up to 200
mm long, compressed, about 10 x 22 mm, fleshy, smooth,
detaching from the bulb at ground level when dry; spathe
valves 2, reflexed, broadly lanceolate, 20-30 x 40-75 mm,
thinly coriaceous; bracteoles filiform; pedicels 50-110
mm long at anthesis, somewhat triangular in cross section,
radiating outward, stiffening and lengthening to 100-210
mm in fruit. Perigone widely trumpet-shaped, slightly
zygomorphic due to the declinate style, ivory to pink, turn-
ing deeper pink with age, dark reddish when collapsed,
sweetly scented; tube subcylindrical, widening slightly
towards the mouth, 8-15 mm long, firm and fleshy; lobes
oblanceolate, 40-65 x 8-15 mm, spreading and slightly
recurved distally, with a raised midrib on the abaxial sur-
face; stamens spreading, very slightly declinate, fused to
the perigone tube just below the throat, otherwise free;
filaments filiform, more or less equalling the perigone
lobes; anthers dorsifixed, about 12 mm long and cream-
coloured before opening; pollen cream-coloured. Ovary
about 10 mm long, narrowly fusiform, obscurely trian-
gular in cross section, placentation axile, 1-19 ovules per
locule; style slender, slightly longer than the perigone
lobes, declinate; stigma truncate, penicillate. Capsule inde-
hiscent, pyriform, ovoid, ellipsoid to subfusiform, 25-100
x 10-35 mm, somewhat triquetrous, strongly 6-ribbed,
bluntly beaked distally. Seeds subglobose or somewhat
bluntly angled by pressure, 5-29 mm wide, fleshy,
greenish; outer covering corky, pale; embryo green.
Chromosome number 2n = 22 (Gouws 1949). Figure 1.
Flowering phenology
Bulbs usually produce a single inflorescence between
December and March or occasionally in early April. Dis-
sections of mature bulbs from the wild retain evidence of
many aborted inflorescences which indicates that flower-
ing is sporadic. Despite this irregular flowering pattern,
inflorescence buds arise consistently in mature bulbs at
four-leaf intervals. Each vegetative shoot consists of a
non-amplexicaul bladeless prophyll, two amplexicaul
foliage leaves and a non-amplexicaul foliage leaf. This
leaf series is also known in Ammocharis heterostyla (Bul-
lock) Milne-Redh. & Schweick. and several species of
Crinum but, unlike Cybistetes, two inflorescences often
develop from each bulb within a few weeks of each other
(Hannibal 1955). Only rarely does the bulb of C. lon-
gifolia produce two inflorescences simultaneously (Figure
1A). The infructescences of C. longifolia usually mature
and detach within four weeks of flowering but during rare
wet autumn seasons the period from flowering to fruit
dispersal may last three months.
Vegetative phenology
Foliage leaves are present only when conditions are
favourable. Usually two growth flushes occur in response
to alternating wet and dry sequences throughout the year.
Thus leaves often appear briefly after late summer or
autumn rains when the bulbs may flower, but may soon
die back with the onset of a warm, dry period when the
infructescences are released (Figure 1 D). Thereafter suc-
cessive winter showers initiate rapid regrowth of the
withered leaves. The leaves may persist up to six months
in the wetter Western Cape (Markotter 1936), unlike the
more variable pattern of growth in the semi-arid Rich-
tersveld, where the leaf blades may elongate and die a
further two times during the year (G. Williamson pers.
obs.). This growth sequence gives the leaves the truncate
apices which are also found in A. coranica. Morphological
studies of A. coranica have shown that the regrowth of
mature leaves is due to a well-developed intercalary
meristem (Troll 1954).
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
131
Pollination
Markotter (1936) reports that wild plants of C. lon-
gifolia from Stellenbosch in the Western Cape are pol-
linated by night-flying moths. Other visitors to flowers of
C. longifolia in the Richtersveld are moths during the
early morning and two common butterflies, the painted
lady and green-yellow lucerne butterfly during the day
(G. Williamson pers. obs.). Snout beetles ( Brachycents
sp.) have been observed eating all parts of C. longifolia
(Figure IB).
Distribution and habitat
Cybistetes longifolia is widely distributed in south-
western Africa from the Orange River to the Cape Penin-
sula (Figure 3). The bulbs favour open, flat terrain either
in light sandy soil or hard gravelly clay.
Sandberg, (-AA), Van Jaarsveld, Forrester & Jacobs 85] 1 (NBG, PRE).
3017 (Hondeklipbaai): 60 miles S of Kommaggas, (-DA), Herre sub
SUG 3072 (BOL).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): 1 mile S of Widows
River, (-DA), Hall 1081 (NBG, PRE); flats between Wiedouw River and
Klaver, (-DA), Snijman 435 (NBG, PRE); 2.2 km S of Wiedouw River
towards Klawer, (-DA), Snijman 1314 (NBG, PRE); Farm Sandkraal,
Vanrhynsdorp Dist., (-DB), Van Breda 4377 (PRE). 32! 8 (Clanwilliam):
Farm Vondeling Op De Nardouwsberg, (-BB), Snijman 1315 (NBG);
Eendekuil, (-DB). Peers s.n. (BOL 16389). 3317 (Saldanha): Saldanha,
(-BB), Duncan 304 (NBG). 3318 (Cape Town): Darling Flora Reserve,
(-AD), Marais 10 (NBG); Lion’s Head, (-CD), Compton 21950 (NBG);
Rietvalley, (-DC), Zeyher 4115 (SAM); near Paarl, (-DB), Barker 5329
(NBG); Stellenbosch, (-DD), Duthie sub NBG 1353/26 (NBG). 3319
(Worcester): Breederivier, Worcester Dist., (-CB), Walters 2443 (NBG).
3418 (Simonstown): Sandy Bay, (-AB), Snijman 1017 (NBG); between
Faure and Lynedoch, (-BA), Esterhuysen 10113 (BOL, NBG, PRE); flats
between Gordon’s Bay and Strand, (-BB), Goldblatt 6463 (PRE). 3320
(Montagu): near Bonnie vale, (-CC), Smith (BOL 21376).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
DISTRIBUTION RECORDS
NORTHERN CAPE. — 2816 (Oranjemund): Annisrivier, (-BD), G.
Williamson 2943 (BOL); Richtersveld, Grootderm, (-DA), Hall 592
(NBG, PRE); Arrisdrif, about 40 km E of Oranjemund, (-DA), G. & F.
Williamson 4626 (K, MO, NBG, PRE); Beauvallon, (-DA), Williamson
4637 (NBG, PRE); Williamson & Gassner 2925 (BOL); Beesbank,
(-DA), Williamson 2944 (BOL). 2817 (Vioolsdrif): Richtersveld,
FIGURE 3. — Known distribution of Cybistetes longifolia.
We thank Dr J.C. Paterson-Jones for the photographs
of seeds and fruits.
REFERENCES
ADAMSON, R.S. & SALTER, T.M. 1950. Flora of the Cape Peninsula.
Juta, Cape Town.
BAKER, J.G. 1888. Handbook of the Amary II ideae. George Bell, London.
BAKER, J.G. 1896. Amaryllideae. In W.T. ThiseltonDyer, Flora capensis
6,3: 529-536. Reeve, London.
DEACON, H.J., JURY. M.R. & ELLIS, F. 1992. Selective regime and
time. In R.M. Cowling, The ecology offynbos: nutrients, fire and
diversity. 7-22. Oxford University Press, Cape Town.
GOUWS, J.B. 1949. Karyology of some South African Amaryllidaceae.
Plant Life 5 : 54—8 1 .
HANNIBAL. L.S. 1955. Flowering habit of Ammocharis. Plant Life 11:
55, 56.
HARPER. J.L., LOVELL, P.H. & MOORE, K.G. 1970. The shapes and
sizes of seeds. Annual Review of Ecology and Svstematics 1:
327-356.
HERBERT, W. 1821. An Appendix. James Ridgway, London.
HERMANN, P. 1698. Paradisus batavus. Elzevier, Leiden.
JACQUIN, N.J. 1776. Hortus botanicus vindobonensis 3. Josephi
Michaelis Gerold, Vindobonae.
KER GAWLER, J.B. 1812. Brunsvigia falcata. Curtis's Botanical
Magazine 35: t. 1448.
LEIGHTON, F.M. 1932. Ammocharis herrei. South African Gardening
and Country Life 22: 110.
L'HERITIER DE BRUTELLE, C.L. 1789. Sertum anglicum 1. Graeffer,
London.
LINDLEY, J. 1829. Amaryllis coranica var. pallida. Edwards’s Botanical
Register 15: t. 1219.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantation 1, Facsimile of 1st edn, W.T.
Stearn (ed.). Bartholomew, Dorking.
MADDOX, J.C. & CARLQUIST, S. 1985. Wind dispersal in Californian
desert plants: experimental studies and conceptual considerations.
Aliso 11: 77-96.
MARKOTTER, E.I. 1936. Die lewensgeskiedenis van sekere geslagte
van die Amaryllidaceae. Annale van die Universiteit van Stellen-
bosch 14, A, 2: 1-84.
MARTLEY, J. 1938. Ammocharis falcata. Herbertia 5: 225-228.
MILNE-REDHEAD, E. & SCHWEICKERDT. H.G. 1939. A new con-
ception of the genus Ammocharis Herb. Botanical Journal of the
Linnean Society 52: 159-197.
ROEMER, M.J. 1847. Familiarum naturalium regni vegetabilis synopses
monographicae 4. Landes-Industrie-Comptoir, Weimar.
STEBBINS, G.L. 1970. Transference of function as a factor in the evolu-
tion of seeds and their accessory structures. Israel Journal of
Botany 19: 59-70.
STEBBINS. G.L. 1974. Flowering plants, evolution above the species
level. Harvard University Press, Massachusetts.
132
TANKARD, A.J. & ROGERS, J. 1978. Late Cenozoic palaeo-environ-
ments on the west coast of southern Africa. Journal of Biogeog-
raphy 5: 319-337 .
THUNBERG, C.R 1794. Prodromus plantation capensium 1. Edman, Uppsala.
Bothalia 24,2 ( 1994)
TROLL, W. 1954. Praktische Einfuhrung in die Pflanzenmorphologie 1:
Der vegetative Aufbau. Gustav Fischer, Jena.
VAN DER PUL, L. 1982. Principles of dispersal in higher plants.
Springer- Verlag, Berlin.
Bothalia 24,2: 133-147 (1994)
Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from southern Africa. 6. The genus
Asterella (Aytoniaceae: Reboulioideae) and its four local species
S.M. PEROLD*
Keywords: Asterella , A. bachmannii , A. marginata, A. muscicola , A. wilmsii, Aytoniaceae, Hepaticae, Marchantiales, Phragmoblepharis ,
Reboulioideae, section Saccatae, southern Africa
ABSTRACT
A taxonomic account of the genus Asterella , and four local representatives, A. muscicola. A. bachmannii, A. marginata and
A. wilmsii, subgenus Phragmoblepharis , is given here. A key to the species is provided. Two specimens identified by Amell
(1963) as Reboulia hemisphaerica, Collins 775 and Eyles CH 1175, are actually A. wilmsii: the presence of the genus Reboulia
in southern Africa is therefore not confirmed and should be deleted from the annotated checklist by Magill & Schelpe (1979)
and Plants of southern Africa: names and distribution (Arnold & De Wet 1993).
UITTREKSEL
'n Taksonomiese verslag oor die genus Asterella, en vier van die plaaslike verteenwoordigers daarvan, A. muscicola, A.
bachmannii, A. marginata en A. wilmsii, subgenus Phragmoblepharis, word hier gegee. ’n Sleutel tot die spesies word verskaf.
Twee eksemplare, Collins 775 en Eyles CH 1175, wat deur Amell (1963) as Reboulia hemisphaerica gei'dentifiseer is, is in
werklikheid A. wilmsii: die teenwoordigheid van die genus Reboulia in Suider-Afrika is dus nie bevestig nie en dit behoort
geskrap te word van die geannoteerde kontrolelys deur Magill & Schelpe (1979) en van Plants of southern Africa: names and
distribution (Arnold & De Wet 1993).
Asterella P. Beauv. in Dictionnaire des sciences
naturelles 3: 257 (1805); A. Evans: 247 (1920); Frye &
L. Clark: 69 (1937); Hassel: 100 (1962); S.W. Amell: 59
(1963); Vanden Berghen: 169 (1972); R.M. Schust.: 224
(1992). Type: A. tenella (L.) P. Beauv. (= Marchantia
tenella L.), (lecto. designated by Long & Grolle 1992b).
Fimbraria Nees: 44 (1820); Gottsche et al .: 555 (1846);
Schiffn.: 33 (1893); Steph.: 84 (1899); Sim: 22 (1926); K.
Miill.: 353 (1952), nom. illeg. Lectotype: F. marginata Nees.
Hypenantron Corda: 648 (1829). Type: H. ciliatum
Corda.
Dictyochiton Corda ex Nees: 258 (1838) nom. inval.
Rhacotheca Bisch.: 12 (1844). Type: R. azotica Bisch.
Octokepos Griff.: 343 (1849). Type: O. khasyanum
Griff.
Thalloid, smallish to medium-sized to fairly large, flat-
tish to slightly concave proximally, firm or rarely some-
what spongy, lime green to bright green, in crowded
patches or dense mats; on soil at seepages and river banks
or in drier, rocky locations. Branches simple, rarely
once/twice pseudodichotomously furcate, or with latero-
ventral or apical innovations; thickened over midrib, thin-
ning toward margins, these from above somewhat scal-
loped, attenuate, frequently purple; apex slightly notched,
with ventral scales recurving over edge.
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XI 01 . Pretoria 0001 .
MS. received: 1993-11-19.
Dorsal epidermis hyaline, unistratose, cells mostly
thin-walled, lacking trigones, occasionally with a single
large oil body; air pores small, simple, slightly raised, sur-
rounded by 2 or 3 concentric rings of cells, 6-8 per ring,
walls rarely radially thickened and pores then stellate; as-
similation tissue with small, empty air chambers in several
irregular layers or tall and in one layer, cells in bounding
walls chlorophyllose but occasionally with an oil body;
storage tissue with rounded or angular cells closely packed
together; rhizoids both smooth and pegged. Scales mostly
purple or wine-red, in 2 forwardly directed ventral rows,
ovate to obliquely triangular, with one (rarely 2 or 3) lan-
ceolate or acuminate appendage, scattered oil cells
present, margins mostly entire.
Monoicous, paroicous or autoicous, rarely dioicous.
Androecia sessile; antheridia in paroicous species in a
cluster or a row immediately or somewhat further poste-
rior to insertion of stalk; in autoicous or dioicous species,
androecia well-defined, on reduced latero-ventral branches
or as a median oval disc on main branch. Archego-
niophores arising from apical notch, borne on stalk with
or without air chambers and with one rhizoidal furrow, at
the summit, with or rarely without paleae; head rounded
or umbonate, nearly smooth to distinctly papillose, its air
chambers opening via compound pores, below with (1-)
2^f(-5) lobes, each enclosing a capsule, the wall of the
latter lacking thickening bands; involucre membranous,
continuous with edges of lobes; pseudoperianth present,
mostly pendulous, conical or blunt, vertically split into
segments, but united at the tip, covering and projecting
beyond the capsule in southern African species. Spores
small to medium-sized to large, yellow, brown or fuscous,
triangular-globular and winged, distal face rounded, most-
ly with regular or irregular network of large, angular to
134
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
FIGURE 1 . — Asterella muscicola. A, dorsal view of thallus; B, ventral view of thallus; C, carpocephalum raised on stalk and antheridia proximal to
foot of stalk; D, transverse section of thallus; E, scale with fimbriate apex; F, scale with acuminate apex; G, transverse section of air pore; H,
dorsal cells, air pore and oil cell from above; 1, transverse section of stalk; J, longitudinal section of young archegoniophore; K, capsule wall
cells. A-C, E, G, I, J, Perold & Koekemoer 2968\ D, F, H, Conch 13\ K, Anderson 1248. Scale bars: A-D, 2 mm; E, F, I. 250 pm; J, I mm;
G, H, K, 50 pm.
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
135
rounded areolae, bordered by ridges and generally lined
with small subsidiary areolae; proximal face with
pronounced triradiate mark, its arms extending across un-
dulating wing, each of three facets also with network of
large and small areolae. Elaters short or of medium length,
with 1-3 spirals. Chromosome number, n = 9 or multiple
thereof, or 10.
Asterella is one of the larger genera of the Marchan-
tiales. It is classified in the family Aytoniaceae, subfamily
Reboulioideae. The genus Asterella has been divided into
three subgenera: Brachyblepharis, Asterella and Phrag-
moblepharis, the latter with three sections, namely Pap-
piae, Lindenbergianae and Saccatae (Grolle 1976). Aste-
rella species are easily recognized by the presence of a
basket-like pseudoperianth, which soon splits into narrow
segments. It occurs world-wide and has had a long and
controversial nomenclatural history, which is reviewed by
Long & Grolle (1992a). Long & Grolle (1992b) have also
submitted a proposal to conserve the generic name
Asterella with a conserved type.
The four southern African species of Asterella are all
placed in subgenus Phragmoblepharis Grolle (1976),
since the segments of the pseudoperianths remain coherent
at their tips for a long time, in contrast to those in sub-
genera Brachyblephar is and Asterella, where they separate
at maturity. The last two subgenera are not found in
southern Africa.
Key to the southern African species of Asterella
la Thalli spongy, with tall air chambers mostly in one storey, and then not subdivided by supplementary partitions, each opening
dorsally by a stellate pore; ventral scales occasionally fimbriate at single lanceolate appendage; carpocephalum round or
umbonate and lacking paleae at summit of stalk; pseudoperianth extending ± 300 |im beyond involucre and subdivided
into 12 or 13 segments; spores 75-95 pm in diameter, dark brown, ornamentation with irregular zigzagging ridges ....
1. A muscicola
1 b Thalli compact, firm, with small, low air chambers in several storeys, only some top ones opening above by a dorsal, non-stellate
pore; ventral scales with 1 (or 2) lanceolate or ovate appendages, margin ± entire; carpocephalum round or umbonate,
papillose or ± smooth, with paleae at summit of stalk; pseudoperianth extending more than 1000 pm beyond involucre
and subdivided into 14—16 segments; spores more than 100 pm in diameter, yellow or brown, ornamentation with larger
areolae generally containing subsidiary areolae:
2a Thalli smallish to large; carpocephalum covered with distinct papillae, projecting ± 200 pm; paleae at summit of stalk shaggy,
dense, pale mauve or colourless, up to 3000 pm long and 4 or 5 cells wide at base; ventral scales with lanceolate
appendage; spores elaborately ornamented with 6-8 areolae across distal face, 20-30 pm wide and ridges extending
across wing, containing numerous subsidiary areolae (common, mostly summer rainfall species) 2. A. bachmaimii
2b Thalli medium-sized to very large; carpocephalum ± smooth or with low papillae; paleae at summit of stalk colourless or
purple, length variable; ventral scales with lanceolate or ovate appendages, spores less elaborately ornamented:
3a Thalli medium-sized; carpocephalum with umbonate head; paleae at summit of stalk mostly colourless, some very long,
more than 8000 pm in length, ± 4 cells wide at base; ventral scales with 1 or 2 lanceolate appendages; spores on
distal face with (4— )6— 9 areolae across, ± 32 pm wide, very high ridges seldom extending across wing, usually
containing small subsidiary areolae (winter rainfall species) 3. A. nuirginata
3b Thalli large to very large; carpocephalum with rounded head, distinctly lobed below; paleae at summit of stalk almost
colourless to purple, 2000-3000 pm long, some up to 7 cells wide at base; ventral scales with single, large-celled,
ovate appendage, constricted at base; spores on distal face with 5-8 areolae across, 25-30 pm wide and extending to wing
margin, almost empty of subsidiary areolae and hollow (summer rainfall, mostly Afromontane species) 4. A wihnsii
1. Asterella muscicola (Steph.) S. W. Arnell: 60
(1963).
Fimbraria muscicola Steph.: 121 (1892); Steph.: 97 (1899), Sim: 22
(1926). Type: Transvaal, Spitzkop bei Lydenburg, Febr. 1888, leg. Dr
Wilms G 001664 , holo.! (G); G 024589 , iso.! (G).
Thallus medium-sized to fairly large, grooved toward
apex, slightly concave more proximally, dorsally bright
green, margins soon turning purple along edge, becoming
proximally wider (up to 1 mm) and pinkish purple (Figure
1A), polygonal outlines of subdorsal air chambers visible
from above, i.e. reticulate dorsally, median areolae small,
enlarging toward margins and then in parallel, radiating
rows, air pores tiny, slightly raised, white ‘specks’, ap-
parently solitary over each polygonal area, wet; thallus
margins clasped together, revealing deep purple, transver-
sely wrinkled underside of wings, dry; in crowded
patches, simple or once/twice pseudodichotomously fur-
cate. Branches 4— 7 (-13) mm long, total length up to 18
mm long, 2.5-3 .5(-6.5) mm wide, in section 1250 pm
thick over midrib, laterally thinning out into attenuate
wings, apex notched, with tips of 4—6 hyaline or purple-
red ventral scales recurving over edge; margins acute, thin,
scalloped, undulate, older parts dead, ventrally somewhat
striate across, shiny, deep purple, flanks sloping obliquely;
ventral face medianly keeled, green, midrib with row of
purple-red scales on either side (Figure IB).
Dorsal epidermis unistratose, hyaline, purplish toward
margins, cells thin-walled, without trigones at angles, from
above 4- or 5-(-7)-sided, (37.5-) 45.0-72.5 x 15.0-25.0
pm, in transverse section 25 pm thick, rarely containing
an oil body; marginal cells mostly 4-sided, variable in
size, (17.5-)25.0-50.0 x 15.0-40.0 pm; air pores very
slightly raised, simple, small, ± 7.5 pm wide, mostly 6-
sided (Figure 1H), up to 137.5 pm distant from each other,
bounded by innermost circle of collapsed cellular remains,
otherwise surrounded by 2 concentric rings of cells, each
generally with 6 cells: inner cells bluntly triangular, smal-
lest 12.5 x 7.5 pm at inner, narrower tip and 17.5 pm at
wider part, larger cells 22.5 x 25.0 pm, radial walls most-
ly thickened and pores thus stellate, outer row of cells
(22.5— )25.0— 32.5 x 25.0-37.5 pm. partly overlain by inner
cells; assimilation tissue up to 650 pm thick, with air
chambers long and empty, in one layer (Figure ID), or
sometimes in several layers, particularly if section not ex-
actly vertically cut and then seen in more than one
plane, 90-150 pm wide above, narrowing to ± 50 pm
wide below, vertical medianly, sloping obliquely toward
margins, unistratose walls composed of cells, (30. 0-)
136
Bothalia 24,2 ( 1994)
37.5 — 47.5 x 32.5 pm in transverse section, when viewed
from the front, 30.0-45.0 x 32.5-40.0 jam; occasionally
with somewhat smaller cells containing an oil body,
light brown to dark brown, smooth or finely warty,
round, diameter ± 30 (am, almost entirely filling cell;
storage tissue ± 600 |am thick, cells tightly packed
together, angular, 20.0-37.5 pm wide, some with oil
bodies, which are here more frequent than in air cham-
ber walls; rhizoids smooth, ± 17.5 pm wide, or pegged
and 22.5 pm wide. Scales wine-red to purple-red, ar-
ranged in 2 forwardly directed ventral rows, one on
either side of midrib, not extending to margins of tlial-
lus, except at apex, obliquely triangular, 1100-1250 pm
wide at curved base, above with acuminate appendage
tapering to a narrow tip (Figure IF), occasionally
toward apex fimbriate (Figure IE) and sometimes with
several one- or two-celled marginal papillae, up to 37.5
x 10.0 pm, total length ± 1050 pm, including 170-350
pm long appendage, 8 or 9 cells wide where it joins
body of scale, cells 5- or 6-sided, rarely rectangular,
57.5- 100.0 x 25.0-32.5 pm, occasionally interspersed
with scattered smaller, colourless cells (2—6 or 8), the
oil body having been lost.
Paroicous. Androecia with antheridia in a group or in
a short single or double row along midline of thallus and
generally immediately proximal to stalk, i.e. basiscopic
of archegoniophore (Figure 1C) or very rarely on sepa-
rate plant, immersed, 350 x 250 pm, each opening above
into a prominent, conical papilla, 220 x 100 pm. Ar-
chegoniophores single, rarely paired at apices of 2 fur-
cating branches, almost sessile when young (Figure 1 J),
domed, air pores compound, leading below into air cham-
bers, supported on and radiating outwards from central
core of parenchymatous tissue, containing numerous oil
cells, these also present in air chamber walls and epider-
mis. Carpocephala at maturity raised on stalk (Figure
1C) arising at bifurcation of branches, the latter continu-
ing in growth; stalk yellowish, shiny, erect or somewhat
bent, 5-8 mm long, stout, 675 pm wide at ± midlength,
becoming thicker toward base and tapering toward sum-
mit, in transverse section irregular in shape, with one
rhizoidal furrow, 175 x 137 pm, cortical cells in single
layer, thick-walled, brown, 12.5 x 12.5-15.0 pm, medul-
lary cells thin-walled, 20.0-32.5 x 12.5-25.0 pm, with
narrow to wide, open air chambers (Figure II); head
rounded to somewhat umbonate, 3 mm across, bearing 4
or 5 capsules, the wall brown with unistratose cells lack-
ing spiral thickenings, 4-6-sided, 50.0-57.5 x 20.0-25.0
pm; pseudoperianths extending obliquely downward and
outward and projecting ± 300 pm beyond involucre,
somewhat flattened sideways, in 12 or 13 cage-like,
hyaline segments, each of which 550 x 150 pm, connate
toward broad, blunt tips, at apex with small central nipple
penetrated by a pore, cells in segments 4-6-sided, 47.5
x 22.5 pm, thick-walled. Spores 75-95 pm in diameter,
triangular-globular, dark brown, opaque, wing somewhat
pleated, 5 pm wide, margin undulate, distal face (Figure
2A-C) convex, reticulate, with very irregular, mostly in-
complete areolae, the ridges forming an irregular, zig-
zagging maze; proximal face (Figure 2D E) with distinct
triradiate mark, facets also with irregular, incomplete
areolae, ranging from small and crowded to larger and
more widely dispersed. Elaters 150-175 pm long, 17.5
pm wide in centre, slightly tapering toward ends, doubly
spiral (Figure 2F), light brown. Chromosome number.
n = 10 (T. Bornefeld pers. comm.)
DISCUSSION
This species of Asterella has tall air chambers and was
initially placed in the group Spongiosae, together with A.
FIGURE 2. — SEM micrographs of Asterella muscicola. A-E, spore: A, distal face; B, distal side view; C, areolae on distal lace much enlarged; D,
proximal face; E, side view. F, elater. A, D-F, Perold & Koekemoer 2968\ B, C, Marais 832. A, D, E, x 490; B, x 320; C, x 952; F, x 460.
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
137
pilosa and A. tenera, by Stephani (1892). It was illustrated
by him in his leones (Microform 1985 seen by me). Later
on, Stephani (1899) proposed a new classification based
on the shape of the female receptacle and he then placed
it in group B, Capituli centrum hemisphaericum. Now-
adays it is classified in subgenus Phragmoblepharis
Grolle, (since the pseudoperianth segments remain at-
tached at their tips when mature), and in its section Sac-
catae, (since the summit of the stalks lack paleae).
Sterile specimens of A. muscicola have been confused
with Athalamia spathysii , since the dorsal air pores are
also stellate. The air chambers are likewise devoid of
chlorophyllose filaments, but oil bodies are more
numerous and their remains are present in the scales
which have cells half as wide as those in A. spathysii. It
differs from Athalamia species mainly in sporophyte char-
acters: the stalk arises at the bifurcation of the branches,
it is thicker and has a rhizoidal furrow, its cortical cells
differ from those in the medulla where air chambers are
present, it is devoid of scales both at the base and summit
(Amell (1963) erroneously refers to scales at the top), the
cells in the capsule wall lack annular or semi-annular
thickenings, pseudoperianths are present, the spores are
larger, dark brown and winged, their ornamentation is
reticulate (not papillose), the shape is triangular-globular
with a distinct triradiate mark on the proximal face and
the elaters are shorter and wider. Mycorrhiza are present
in the storage tissue, having entered via the rhizoids.
Vegetative reproduction is rarely by ventral stolons.
Quite a number of Asterella specimens held at PRE
had been incorrectly identified as A. muscicola, even by
Amell (1957), who also misnamed a Volk collection of
Athalamia spathysii from Namibia as Asterella muscicola
(Volk 1979). Sim (1931) also reported A. muscicola from
South West Africa [Namibia] but this has not been con-
firmed; in fact, according to Volk (1979), Grolle had in-
formed him (pers. comm.) that A. muscicola does not
grow in Namibia.
The type specimens consist of only a few fragments
and were collected east of Lydenburg, south of the present
town of Sabie, Eastern Transvaal. The species is probably
endemic to southern Africa and is known from Botswana,
the North-West (northeastern Cape & southeastern Trans-
vaal), Northern and Eastern Transvaal (type specimen),
KwaZulu/Natal, Orange Free State, Lesotho, and Eastern
Cape (Figure 3). Its range extends into Malawi (Kasunga
Nat. Park, Perold 2682) and Zimbabwe (Eyles 932, 933;
Miller 7869) from where it is also reported by Best (1990).
It frequently grows at high altitudes on soil overlying
sandstone or basalt outcrops in association with other
liverworts such as Plagiochasma spp. and Riccia spp.
2. Asterella bachmannii (Steph.) S. W. Amell,
Hepaticae of South Africa: 62 (1963). Type: Pondoland,
Port Grosvenor, Bachmann ( 13866 G, lecto.!; 13867 G!).
Fimbraria bachmannii Steph.: 7 (1894); Steph.: 105 ( 1899). Sim: 22
(1926).
TTtallus smallish to medium-sized to quite large, firm
and compact, dorsally flat, light green, rather crystalline
to shiny when fresh, margins turning purple on exposure
to sun (Figure 4A), crinkled outlines of small subdorsal
air chambers faintly or not visible from above, air pores
FIGURE 3. — Distribution of Asterella muscicola. •; A. wilmsii. □ , in
southern Africa and Zimbabwe; andA. marginata. ▲, in southern
Africa. Summer rainfall area: to the right of the solid line. Summer
and winter rainfall area: to the left of the solid line. Winter rainfall
area: to the left of the broken line.
tiny, slightly raised and scattered, wet; thallus margins
raised or inflexed, sometimes inrolled and tightly clasped
together, dry; in crowded, overlying mats, simple or oc-
casionally once, rarely several times pseudodichotomously
furcate, often with apical or latero-ventral innovations.
Branches broadly ligulate, widening rapidly from narrow
base, when simple up to 17 or 18 mm long, when
branched total length up to 25 mm, with terminal branches
3-4 mm long and moderately divergent, (1.9— )2.5— 4.0
(-4.9) mm wide, (450-)500-600(-775) pm thick over
midrib, laterally thinning out into attenuate wings, apex
slightly notched, with tips of a few ventral scales recurv-
ing over edge; margins acute, thin, slightly scalloped,
somewhat undulate; ventrally green or red to deep purple,
laterally somewhat striate across obliquely sloping flanks,
medianly keeled, midrib with row of purple scales on
either side (Figure 4B).
Dorsal epidermis unistratose, generally containing
chloroplasts, from above cells (4-)5- or 6-sided, thin-
walled, (30.0— )50.0—67.5(— 90.0) x 22.5-30.0 pm, their
orientation changing from apically directed medianly to
outwardly sloping laterally in transverse section, (20-)
25-35 pm thick, occasionally containing a round oil
body, 25 pm across, almost filling cell; marginal cells in
1 or 2 rows, long- or short-rectangular (Figure 4G), oc-
casionally 5-sided, 30.0-50.0 x (1 2.5-) 17.5-22.5 pm; air
pores slightly raised (Figure 4F), simple, small, oval, up
to 17.5 x 12.5 pm, 110-150 pm distant from each other
(Figure 4E), bounded by innermost circle of collapsed
cells, and outwardly surrounded by 2 intact, partly over-
lying concentric rings of 6— 8(— 10) cells in each, inner
ones smaller, ± 12.5 x 15.0-20.0 pm, outer ones bluntly
wedge-shaped, up to 15-20 x 25-35 pm. radial walls not
thickened; assimilation tissue up to 280 mm thick, with
small, empty air chambers (Figure 4D), 37.5-75.0 pm
wide, in 2-4 storeys, toward margins elongating and slop-
ing obliquely, chlorophyllose cells in bounding walls
rounded or oval, 25.0-30.0 x 22.5-32.5 pm; storage tis-
sue mostly confined to keel, ± 360 pm thick, cells an-
gular, isodiametric, ( 17. 5-)25. 0-35.0 pm wide, closely
packed together, walls thick and pitted, an occasional cell
138
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
i i
FIGURE 4. — Asterellci bachmannii. A, dorsai view of thallus; B, venlral view of thallus, appendages of scales mostly not visible against dark purple
flanks; C, carpocephalum with papillose disc and two pseudoperianths; D, transverse section of thallus; E, air pore and surrounding cells
from above; F, transverse section of air pore; G, marginal cells; H, appendage and upper part of scale; I, transverse section of stalk; J, paleae.
A-D, I, Glen 2/50; E, G, H, .1, Perold & Koekemoer 2856\ F, Candy 7. Scale bars: A-D, I mm; E-G, 50 pm; H, 1, 250 pm; J, 100 pm.
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
139
with oil body; rhizoids arising from ventral surface
numerous, smooth, 15-20(-30) (4m wide, or pegged, 7.5-
17.5 |im wide. Scales (Figure 4H) red to deep purple,
arranged in 2 forwardly directed ventral rows, one on
either side of midrib, not extending to margins of thallus,
obliquely triangular, usually with a single lanceolate ap-
pendage, occasionally with two, 450-650(-800) |4m long,
constricted at base, 150-200 |4m wide, tapering above to
a conical apical cell, 50.0-87.5 x 7.5-17.5 pm, lower
cells 95.0-125.0 x 32.5-37.5 pm, body of scale up to
1000 pm long and 1500 pm wide at its crescentic base,
cells 4-6-sided, 50.0-77.5 x 25.0-35.0 pm, scale tapering
to narrow ‘tail' below, cells long and narrow, 82.5-122.5
x 12.5 pm, ± 8 smaller, colourless cells per scale, 35 x
35 pm, containing remains of oil body.
?Dioicous, rarely autoicous. Androecia extending back-
wards in median patch from apex of main branch, rarely
with a second one at a midlength constriction, or, some-
times on short apical or lateral innovations, antheridia im-
mersed in sessile, elongated or oval cushions, ± 3000 x
750 pm, lacking scales and opening above via stout,
raised, purple-red papillae, 150 pm long. Archego-
niophores proximal to apical notch of main branch or rare-
ly on short latero-ventral innovations, single, occasionally
paired at apices of 2 forking branches, almost sessile when
young, with numerous (± 75), long, pale, sometimes
purple, paleae arching over disc. Carpocephala at
maturity raised on stalk, arising 1.5 mm back from apex
of branch in apical notch, its foot sometimes in a shallow,
rounded depression proximally, its length variable, ( 1— )5—
1 3(— 20 ) mm long, whitish to purple, widening toward
base, in transverse section at ± midlength (Figure II) 550
x 450 pm, with single rhizoidal furrow, cortical cells in
a single layer, slightly thicker-walled. 17.5 x 12.5 pm.
medullary cells angular, ± 25.0 x 17.5 pm; at summit of
stalk ± 32 slender, shaggy paleae, white or purple, up to
3250 pm long, 4 or 5 cells wide at base, cells 120-137
x 25 pm, gradually tapering to conical apical cell, 67.5 x
20.0 pm (Figure 4J); disc rounded, ± 3 mm across when
bearing 4 or 5 capsules, but frequently with only 1 or 2
capsules (Figure 4C) and then smaller, above with
numerous prominent papillae, outwardly projecting ± 200
pm and enclosing air chambers which open above via
compound air pores; membranous involucre partly cover-
ing capsules below, the latter spherical, 1000 pm across,
the wall turning brown, unistratose, cells lacking spiral
thickenings, 4-6-sided, 62.5-80.0 x 27.5-37.5 pm, toward
apex of capsule cells shrinking and their walls thickening,
with trigones at corners, the wall dehiscing along well-
defined line and inner basal part remaining attached; pseu-
doperianths descending obliquely downward and
extending ± 1000 pm beyond involucre, generally split
into 14 cage-like segments, shiny white or purple-stained,
up to 2375 pm long and 750 pm wide at widest part,
tapering to narrow tips where coherent with other seg-
ments, the cells elongated, 175-258 x 37 pm, becoming
shorter toward tip. Spores 102.5-125.0 pm in diameter,
triangular-globular, mostly yellow, sometimes brown,
translucent, wing undulate, up to ± 20 pm wide, margin
crenulate, distal face (Figure 5A, B) convex, with network
of 6-8 angular areolae across, 20-30 pm wide, ridges 7.5-
10.0 pm high and laterally extending across wing, hollow
floor of areolae highly porate (Figure 5C) and generally
with smaller subsidiary areolae (Figure 5A), sometimes
with ornamentation becoming very elaborate (Figure 5B)
and always extending over crests of main ridges and
across wing to margin; proximal face with prominent
triradiate ridge (Figure 5D, E), its arms ± 15 pm high and
continuous from the pole across wing to margin, each of
FIGURE 5. — SEM micrographs of Asterella bachmannii. A-E, spore: A, distal face with primary and subsidiary areolae; B, distal face, seen slightly
from side, with more highly ornamented areolae; C, much enlarged areolae on distal face, lacking subsidiary areolae, but highly porate; D.
proximal face; E, side view. F, elater. A, Glen 2155 ; B, Dieterlen 1142; C, S.M. Perold 2703 ; D. Perold & Koekemoer 2917: E, Perold &
Koekemoer 2874; F, Perold & Koekemoer 2856. A, D, E, x 400; B, x 430; C, x 1000; F, x416.
140
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
3 facets with areolae, ± 10 jim wide, also extending across
wing and containing numerous (Figure 5D) or fewer (Fig-
ure 5E), smaller, subsidiary areolae that cross over crests
of main areolae and onto wing to margin, which is finely
ornamented on both faces. Elaters 1 42— 1 65(— 1 80) pm
long, and 15 jam wide in centre, slightly tapering to the
ends, doubly spiral (Figure 5F), yellow. Chromosome
number, n = 9. (T. Bomefeld pers. comm.)
DISCUSSION
Asterella bachmannii is a variable species and can
range in size from smallish to quite large. The thallus
margins and ventral face can be very deeply pigmented
or hardly at all, depending on whether it is exposed to
intense sunlight or not. The ventral scales can likewise be
deeply pigmented and the appendages are then not clearly
discernible against the purple flanks as in Figure 4B. It
can be distinguished from A. muscicola by the compact-
ness of the assimilation tissue and from A. wilmsii, by its
smaller size and the lanceolate appendages (occasionally
double) of the purple or reddish purple ventral scales and
from A. marginata by its generally purple, not wide, black
thallus margins and by its mostly summer rainfall distribu-
tion. Sterile specimens with lanceolate scale appendages
that had been collected in the summer rainfall areas (Fig-
ure 3: area to the right of the solid line) have not been
named, although there can be little doubt that they should
also be placed under A. bachmannii. Asterella bachmannii
and A. marginata are, however, sympatric in the Western
and Eastern Cape, where the winter and summer rainfall
seasons overlap (Figure 3: area to the left of the solid
line), and here too only specimens with carpocephala have
been named. Fertile plants of A. bachmannii are easily
recognized by the mostly pronounced papillae on the disc
of the carpocephalum as well as by the dense, narrow,
stringy or shaggy paleae which are usually white, but oc-
casionally can be purple-stained. The spores are highly
ornamented with the main areolae containing numerous
smaller subsidiary areolae on both faces, giving it a lacey
appearance. Spores from all available sporulating material
were photographed by SEM and the spore ornamentation
proved to be the most consistently uniform character, ex-
cept in immature spores and in some old spores which
had become shrivelled.
The sexuality is difficult to determine, as the plants
form dense overlying mats with apical and latero-ventral
innovations; rarely xould it be conclusively ascertained
that an androecium grew on a short lateral innovation of
a main branch with a carpocephalum at the apex and even
more rarely, both a carpocephalum and an androecium
were found on lateral innovations of the same main
branch.
Asterella bachmannii is common and by far the most
frequently collected Asterella species in the summer rain-
fall areas of southern Africa. It is known from Botswana,
the North-West, Northern and Eastern Transvaal, the PWV
(central Transvaal), Swaziland, KwaZulu/Natal, Orange
Free State, Lesotho, Eastern and Western Cape (Figure 6).
It is mostly found on damp soil along stream banks, at
waterfalls or in shaded gulleys or kloofs, sometimes on
soil-covered vertical rock walls at seepages or on soil
overlying sandstone, in light shade or in full sunlight. It
FIGURE 6. — Distribution of Asterella bachmannii in southern Africa
(and Zimbabwe).
occasionally grows together with A. wilmsii , Sym-
phyogyna species and Fossombronia species. Its range ex-
tends into Zimbabwe (Eyles CH 776 , CH 1122 , CH 1276;
Miller CH 4250; Schelpe 4009 , 5359; Sim CH 1213, CH
1249) and Malawi ( Perold 2573 , Nyika Nat. Park). Best
(1990) has also reported it from Zimbabwe. It is thought
that the specimens from Zaire ( Schmidt 258, 7188 ) iden-
tified and described by Vanden Berghen (1972) as A. mar-
ginata should be placed here, since the carpocephalum
disc is markedly papillose and the ventral scale, as il-
lustrated by him, has two acuminate appendages, which
I also sometimes found in A. bachmannii. In A. marginata
most of the paleae are generally much longer and its dis-
tribution is moreover apparently confined to the winter
rainfall area (Figure 3: area to the left of the broken line)
of the Western Cape with outliers in the Eastern Cape.
3. Asterella marginata (Nees) S.W. Arnell,
Hepaticae of South Africa: 63 ( 1963). Type: Capite b. spei,
crescit iuxta viam in monte Leuwenstaart ad terrain, leg.
Bergius (BM).
Fimbraria marginata Nees: 44 (1820); Gottsche et a!:. 559 (1846);
Steph.: 104 (1899).
Thallus medium-sized, firm and compact, dorsally flat-
fish to somewhat concave, bright green, marginally with
narrow to mostly wide black or occasionally reddish
purple border (Figure 7A), shiny to dull, outlines of sub-
dorsal air chambers hardly visible from above, air pores
slightly raised and scattered, wet; thallus margins raised
to inrolled, dry; in crowded mats, simple or once, rarely
twice pseudodichotomously furcate, sometimes with api-
cal or latero-ventral innovations. Branches obovate to ob-
cordate, or ligulate, frequently widening rapidly from
narrow base, up to 23 mm long, with tenninal branches
10-15 mm long and moderately to widely divergent, 2.3-
5.0 mm wide, 550-565 pm thick over midrib, laterally
thinning out into attenuate wings, apex notched, with ap-
pendages of apical scales recurving over edge; margins
acute, thin, very wavy to almost frilly; ventrally green
over midrib, but partly covered by row of purple scales
on either side (Figure 7B), flanks purple to black and obli-
quely sloping (Figure 7D).
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
FIGURE 7. — Asterella marginata. A. dorsal view of thallus with young carpocephalum raised on stalk and sessile androecium; B, ventral view of
thallus; C, carpocephalum with pseudoperianths; D, transverse section of thallus; E, transverse section of air pore; F, air pore and surrounding
cells from above; G, marginal cells; H, ventral scale with one appendage; I, ventral scale with 2 appendages; J, transverse section of stalk; K,
paleae. A, B, D-F, FI, I, S.M. Perold 2787\ C, Pillans 3991 ; G, Arnell 505 ; J, Arnell 206', K, Koekemoer 3 1 6. Scale bars; A-D, 1 mm; E-G,
50 pm; H-J, 250 pm; K, 100 pm.
142
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
Dorsal epidermis unistratose, from above cells 5- or
6-sided, walls thin but slightly thickened at corners, 30.0-
45.0 x 17.5-20.0 jam, in transverse section 27.5-37.5 pm
thick; marginal cells in 1 or 2 rows (Figure 7G), short-
rectangular, 25 x 30 pm, or isodiametric, 27.5 x 27.5 pm,
or irregular in shape; air pores slightly raised (Figure 7E),
simple, oval, small, ± 10.0 x 7.5 pm and up to 1 17.5 pm
distant from each other, bounded by innermost ring of
collapsed cells, ± 5 pm wide, outwardly surrounded by 2
intact, partly overlying concentric rings of 5-7 cells in
each, inner ones smaller (Figure 7F), 10.0-12.5 x 12.5—
22.5 pm, outer ones 15.0-17.5 x (17. 5-) 25.0-35.0 pm;
assimilation tissue 200-250 pm thick, with small, empty
air chambers in top 2 or 3 storeys, 12.5-42.5 pm wide,
becoming larger in lowest storey, up to 75 x 50 pm,
chlorophyllose cells in bounding walls rounded to oval,
20.0-35.0 x 22.5-27.5 pm, quite frequently with round
oil body, ± 20 pm in diameter and almost tilling cell;
storage tissue confined to keel, ± 300 pm thick, cells an-
gular and closely packed together, 22.5^15.0 pm wide,
some containing an oil body, cell walls porate, thickened,
often with striate network of thickening bands; rhizoids
numerous, some pegged, 10-15 pm wide, others smooth,
15-22 pm wide. Scales (Figure 7H, I) deep purple to
lightly pigmented, in two forwardly directed ventral rows,
one on either side of midrib, not extending to thallus mar-
gins, triangular to obliquely triangular, with 1 or 2(3) lan-
ceolate, apically shortly acuminate appendages, equal in
length or not, 675-925 pm long, tapering to single apical
cell, ± 105 x 15 pm, lower cells ± 100.0 x 27.5 pm,
gradually becoming shorter, ± 40.0 x 22.5 pm, toward
unconstricted base, ± 375 pm wide, body of scale ± 675
pm long, 825-925 pm wide at crescentic base, cells 55-
125 x 27-32 pm, 5- or 6-sided, walls somewhat sinuate,
tapering below to narrow 'tail', where cells long-rectan-
gular, 70-150 x 10-12 pm, oil body remains in up to ±
20 cells per scale, colourless, rounded, 37.5 x 30.0 pm,
a few small mucilage papillae at lateral scale margin.
Autoicous or monoicous. Androecia in sessile cushions
on latero-ventral innovations or at base of main branches
(Figure 7A), antheridia immersed and opening above via
raised, purple papillae. Archegoniophores proximal to api-
cal notch of main branch, single, occasionally paired at
apices of two furcating branches, almost sessile when
young. Carpocephala at maturity raised on stalk, arising
± 1 mm back from apex of branch in apical notch, its
foot slightly wider than midlength dimensions of ± 575
x 600 pm, in transverse section (Figure 7J) with a single
rhizoidal furrow, 85 pm wide, cortical cells in one layer,
slightly thicker-walled on outside, small and rounded, ±
17.5 x 17.5 pm, medullary cells angular, 15-30 pm wide,
length of stalk variable, 2.5-18.0 mm, white or reddish
purple, at its summit (and along its length) with numerous
pale, occasionally purple paleae (Figure 7K), some of
them very long, up to 8400 pm, others 1250-2750 pm,
base ± 100 pm or 4 cells wide, tapering to single apical
cell, 95 x 30 pm, lower cells 125 x 27 pm; disc + 3 mm
across, umbonate (Figure 7C), air pores compound, slight-
ly raised amd sometimes quite conspicuous, ( 1 — )3— 5(— 6)
capsules borne below, each encased in pseudoperianth
which descends obliquely downward, extending ± 1100
pm beyond the involucre and divided into 15 segments,
these 2125 pm long and 550 pm wide at widest part,
tapering toward coherent tip, cells (4-)5- or 6-sided, 90.0-
137.5 x 25.0-37.5 pm, lower down smaller, ± 50 x 25
pm. Spores ( 102-) 125-140 pm in diameter, triangular-
globular, yellow, translucent, wing undulate, up to 20 pm
wide, margin crenulate, distal face (Figure 8 A, B) convex,
centrally with (4— )6-9 complete areolae, ± 32.5 pm wide,
outer areolae incomplete, the ridges up to 12.5 pm high,
seldom extending across wing, smaller, subsidiary areolae,
2. 5-5.0 pm wide (and occasionally even further divided
up), generally covering floor of larger areolae and extend-
ing over crests of main ridges (Figure 8C); proximal face
with prominent triradiate mark (Figure 8D, E), its arms
15 pm high and continuous from the pole across wing to
margin, each of 3 facets with complete or mostly incom-
plete areolae, main ridges sometimes extending across
wing, small subsidiary areolae covering floor and ridges
of main areolae, as well as arms of triradiate mark. Elaters
± 145 pm long, 12.5 pm wide in centre, slightly tapering
to the ends, doubly spiral (Figure 8F), yellow. Chromo-
some number: n = not known.
DISCUSSION
Asterella marginata has frequently been confused with
A. bachmannii, in fact, Amell (1963) stated that he could
find no real differences between them, basing his opinion
on their scale appendages, air pores, epidermal cells and
spores. The result is that many specimens held at PRE
and BOL, have been wrongly identified. Sterile collec-
tions of A. marginata are indeed difficult to place. In fer-
tile specimens, however, the umbonate head of the
carpocephalum, which lacks prominent papillae and the
frequently very long, pale paleae, as well as the spore
ornamentation mostly with numerous fine, ± regular, sub-
sidiary areolae contained within the highly ridged, larger
ones, which usually do not extend across the wing, make
it quite easily recognizable. Its distribution, moreover, ap-
pears to be confined to the winter rainfall areas of the
Western and Eastern Cape, the latter being the only area
where A. marginata (Figure 3) and A. bachmannii (Figure
6) occur together. Previous reports of A. marginata from
elsewhere (Stephani 1899; Arne! I 1963; Vanden Berghen
1972; Best 1990) should be treated with reservation. As
noted under A. bachmannii , Vanden Berghen’s (1972: fig.
75A) illustration of A. marginata , with prominent papillae
on the carpocephalum head, suggest it to be the fonner
species, and not the latter.
Asterella marginata grows in dense mats on clayey soil
or on weathered, soil-covered rocks at seepages or river-
banks, between rock crevices and under ledges, sometimes
in association with Fossombronia spp., Bryum spp. and
Riccia spp.
4. Asterella wilmsii (Steph.) S.W Amell , Hepaticae
of South Africa: 62 (1963). Type: Spitzkopf bei Lyden-
burg, Transvaal, leg. Dr Wilms (ex Herb. Jack, (001666
G, lecto. fide in litt. Grolle!) selected here; ex Herb. Steph.
024590 G!).
Fimbraria wilmsii Steph.: 122 (1892); ibid.: 103 (1899); Sim: 23
(1926).
F. angolensis Steph: 100 (1899); Asterella angolensis S.W. Amell:
64 (1963). Type: Angola, Huilla, waterfall, Newton 25a (001673 G,
holo.!) fide Grolle (on specimen packet).
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
143
FIGURE 8. — SEM micrographs of A sterella marginata. A-E, spore: A, distal face; B, distal face seen slightly from the side;C, much enlarged areolae
with inner subsidiary areolae; D, proximal face; E, side view. F, elater. A, Amell 267\ B, C, E, S.M. Perold 2418; D, Arnell 505; F, S.M.
Perold 2092. A, x 340; B, x 424; C, x 990; D. x 304; E, x 408; F, x 493.
Thallus large, thin but compact, dorsally flat to slightly
concave, yellowish green, margins gently scalloped, dark
red (Figure 9A), pigmentation becoming diffuse inwardly,
outlines of subdorsal air chambers not visible from above,
air pores hardly raised, wet; thallus margins slightly raised
to inflexed or sometimes inrolled, dry; in crowded, over-
lying mats, mostly simple or once pseudo-dichotomously
furcate, sometimes with apical or latero-ventral innova-
tions. Branches broadly ligulate, widening rapidly from
narrow base, 30-40(-75) mm long, if furcate, terminal
branches up to 10 mm long, narrowly to moderately diver-
gent, 4.7—7. 1 mm wide; 600-800(-950) pm thick over
midrib, laterally thinning out into attenuate wings (Figure
9D), apex notched with appendages of hyaline to deep
purple ventral scales recurving over edge; margins acute,
thin, somewhat undulate; ventrally reddish purple, lateral-
ly striate across, flanks sloping obliquely, medianly
keeled, green, midrib with row of purple-red scales on
either side (Figure 9B).
Dorsal epidermis unistratose, cells containing chloro-
plasts, from above 5- or 6-sided, elongated, thin-walled,
50-95 x 25-35 pm, toward wings up to 1 07 x 30 pm, in
transverse section (30.0-)37.5-47.5 pm thick, occasional-
ly with round oil body, 25-35 pm, almost filling cell;
marginal cells somewhat thicker-walled, especially on the
outer side, in 1 or 2 rows (Figure 9E). elongated, 30.0-
50.0 x 12.5-15.0 pm, inner cells 25-50 x 25 pm; air
pores (Figure 9F) very slightly raised, simple, oval, small,
17.5 x 8.0 pm and 125-250 pm distant from each other,
surrounded by 3 concentric rings of (6— )7— 9 cells in each,
innermost ring ± 5 pm wide, with cells collapsed, in the
next ring cells rounded to transversely oval or bluntly tri-
angular, 12.5-17.5 x 22.5 pm, partly overlying outer ring
of bluntly triangular or polygonal cells, 15-27 x 35-40
pm; assimilation tissue ( 150— )250— 3 20 pm thick over
midrib, air chambers medianly in several vertical storeys,
toward margins sloping obliquely, small and irregularly
shaped, (25— )35— 50 pm wide, mostly empty and only
rarely with 1 or 2 cells jutting into a chamber immediately
below an air pore (Figure 9G), bounding cells oval to
round, 45.0-52.5 x 27.5-37.5 pm, occasionally containing
an oil body; storage tissue 450-650 pm thick over midrib,
thinning out gradually and absent at margins, cells angular
and closely packed, 25.0-37.5(^10.0) pm wide, becoming
somewhat smaller lower down, walls thick, porate and
sometimes with a network of striations; rhizoids in
clumps, mostly smooth, 22.5-25.0 pm wide, pegged ones
10.0-12.5 pm wide. Scales hyaline or pink to purple-red,
arranged in two forwardly directed ventral rows, one on
each side of midrib, not extending to margins of thallus,
except at apex, obliquely crescentic with large, ovate or
roughly triangular appendage (Figure 9H), (850—) 1050—
1200 x 420-500 pm, cells long-hexagonal, 92-150 x 55-
62 pm, at apex ending in single cell forming an apiculus,
65-100 x 15 pm, at base constricted where joined to rest
of scale, 1000-1100 x 950-1050 pm, where cells smaller
and elongated, 60-100 x 35-42 pm, scale continuing into
long tail, ± 1200 x 200 pm, cells 1 05— 1 37(— 220) x (12-)
22-25 pm, ± 9 cells per scale, only 42-55 x 42-47 pm,
containing an oil body in each.
Autoicous. Androecia in raised cushions, oval or elon-
gated or heart-shaped, 1.0-3. 5 x 1.0 mm, extending back-
wards from apex of main branch, frequently on apical or
latero-ventral innovation, antheridia immersed and open-
ing above via conspicuous papillae. Archegoniophores
proximal to apical notch of main branch, single, oc-
casionally paired at apices of two forking branches, ± ses-
sile when young and surrounded by up to 70 purple
paleae, not arching over disc. Carpocephala at maturity
raised on stalk, arising ± 2 mm back from apex of branch
144
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
FIGURE 9. — Asterella wilmsii. A, dorsal lace of thallus with stalk and carpocephaluin; B, ventral face of thallus; C, carpocephalum from below; D,
transverse section of thallus; E, marginal cells; F, air pore, dorsal cells and oil cell from above; G, transverse section of air pore and air
chamber; H, ventral scale; I, transverse section of stalk; J, paleae from summit of stalk. A, I, J, S.M. Perold 2632', B, C, H. Anderson, I219cr,
D, E, Perold & Koekemoer2836\ F, G, H, Perold & Koekemoer 2830. Scale bars: A- D, 1 mm; E-G, 50 pm; H, I, 250 pm; J, 100 pm.
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
145
in apical notch, its length variable, (2 — )4 — 1 ()(— 20) mm
long, often purple, widening toward base, in transverse
section at ± midlength (Figure 91) 600 x 525 fim, with
rhizoidal furrow ± 75 x 100 pm, cortical cells in a single
layer, thick-walled, especially on outside, rounded, 15.0-
27.5 x 12.5 pm, medullary cells with thinner walls, but
thickened at corners, up to 37.5 x 30.0 pm, at summit of
stalk and also protruding from notches of disc, dark purple
paleae (Figure 9J), occasionally pink or colourless, length
variable, up to 2000 pm long, rarely as much as 3250 pm
long, but then narrower, and only 3 cell rows wide, mostly
up to 7 cell rows or ± 325 pm wide at base, cells (4— )5
or 6-sided, ± 155.0 x 62.5 pm. gradually tapering to con-
ical apical cell, 100 x 25 pm; disc rounded, 3. 5-5.0 mm
across when bearing full complement of 4 or 5 capsules
(Figure 9C), but sometimes only 1 or 2 capsules present
and then smaller and asymmetric, above almost smooth
or with low papillae further down, from which compound
air pores lead to air chambers below; capsules spherical,
wall with cells 4-6-sided, 57.5-85.0 x 42.5-65.0 pm, thin-
walled and lacking spiral thickenings, but toward dehis-
cence line cells much thickened at corners, turning brown,
27.5- 47.5 x 27.5-32.5 pm; pseudoperianth extending up
to 1500 pm beyond involucre, generally with 16 seg-
ments, white or purple-stained, 2250 x 500 pm, tapering
to narrow tip where coherent with other segments, cells
100.0-137.5 x 40 pm, toward tip 62.5-75.0 x 27.5-37.5
pm. Spores 115.0-152.5 pm in diameter, triangular-
globular, mostly yellow, translucent, wing thin, somewhat
scalloped, 20.0-22.5 pm wide, margin crenulate, distal
face (Figure 10A, B) convex, with network of 5-8, ±
smooth, angular, complete or incomplete areolae across
and extending over wing to margin on both sides, 25-30
x 20-25 pm, small subsidiary areolae sometimes present
(Figure 10C), and extending over crests of main ridges,
7.5- 10.0 pm high; proximal face with prominent triradiate
ridge (Figure 10D, E), its arms up to 25 pm high and
continuous from the pole across wing to margin, each of
3 facets with rounded areolae, up to 20 x 20 pm, some
with small, subsidiary areolae, others appearing smooth
and hollowed out. Elaters (Figure 10F) 225-230 pm long,
17.5 pm wide in centre, slightly tapering to ends, 12.5
pm wide, sometimes branched, doubly spiral, yellow.
Chromosome number, not known.
DISCUSSION
Asterella wilmsii is the largest of the southern African
species in this genus. It can also be distinguished from
the others by the single, ovate or roughly triangular, large-
celled appendage of the ventral scales, by the distinctly
lobed disc of the carpocephalum, with purple paleae
protruding from the notches and by the paleae being
generally slightly broader based (up to 7 cells wide). The
young, almost sessile archegoniophore is surrounded by
purple paleae, which do not arch over it, as in A. bach-
mannii. The disc is less papillose and the spores are not
as highly ornamented as those of A. bachmannii, often
lacking smaller subsidiary areolae in the large areolae,
which then appear to be almost smooth and hollow and
extend across the wing. A. wilmsii is not as widespread
in southern Africa as A. bachmannii and it is far less fre-
quently collected. It is known from the PWV, Northern
and Eastern Transvaal, Swaziland and KwaZulu/Natal
(Figure 3). Its range extends northward into Zimbabwe
( Coates Palgrave 2524; Eyles 414. 786, CH 1175; Henkel
2558; Miller CH 4249; Schelpe 4063, 5650; Volk 00640),
from where it has also been reported by Best (1990), and
into Angola (the type specimen of A. angolensis ) as well
as Malawi (Bizot et al. 1976). It may also grow in Zaire,
a tentative conclusion based on the ovate scale appendages
FIGURE 10. — SEM micrographs of Asterella wilmsii. A-E, spore: A, distal face: B, distal face seen from the side; C, much enlarged areolae on distal
face, with some inner subsidiary areolae which also extend over their crests; D. proximal face; E, side view. F, elater. A, Sim CH 1269; B,
D, Doidge 3187; C, Sim CH 1274\ E, F, Perold & Koekemoer2836. A, B, x 316; C, x 1033; D, x 277; E, F, x 340.
146
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
illustrated by Vanden Berghen (1972) in his fig. 74H, I
and the distal spore face in fig. 74K, which suggest this
species, although the material was merely designated as
Asterella sp. by him. Asterella wilmsii was also reported
from Mozambique by Amell ( 1963). The main distribution
pattern along the mountains of the eastern part of the sub-
continent suggests that it is an Afromontane species with
isolated western outliers. It grows on damp soil along
streambanks and waterfalls, sometimes in forested areas,
forming dense mats, occasionally in association with A.
bachmannii and Symphyogyna spp.
Two specimens of A. wilmsii , Collins 775 from Rus-
tenburg Kloof, and Eyles CH 1175 from Goromanzi in
Zimbabwe, had been misidentified and reported by Arnell
(1963) as Reboulia haemispherica. The presence of the
genus Reboulia has not been confirmed in southern Africa
and the species should accordingly be deleted from the
checklist of southern African bryophytes (Magill &
Schelpe 1979), as well as from Plants of southern Africa:
names and distribution (Arnold & De Wet 1993).
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
Alheit 54610 (3) BOL. H. Anderson CH 1219 (2), 1219a (4), 1248
(1) , 1262. CH 4504. CH 4505 (2), CH 12758 (4), CH 13288. CH 13587
(2) PRE. Amell 46. 206. 216, 239. 267. 505, 5359 (3) BOL.
Bachmann, G 13866 (lectotype), G 13867 (2). G. Bayer CH 1235 (2)
PRE. Bews CH 1229 (4), CH 1259. CH 1272 (2) PRE. Bosmari CH 208 ,
LI 3185 (2) PRE. Bottomley CH 172 (2), CH 263 (3), CH 1217, CH
2863 (4) PRE. Bottomley & Doidge CH 3565 (2), C'H 3591 (4) PRE.
Braun 714 (2) PRE.
• Coates Palgrave 2524 (4) BOL. Collins 775 (4) PRE. Condy 13 (1),
14, 17 (2) PRE.
Deal & Kiltick 78b (2) PRE. Dieterlen 793a & b (1), 794, 1119.
1120, 1142 (2) PRE. Doidge CH 17 (2), CH 170 p.p., CH 3187 (4) PRE.
Du Plessis 54613 (2) BOL. Dyer 863 (3) PRE.
Edwards CH 1270 (4) PRE. Ellis CH 13472 (1) PRE. Eyles 414 (4)
CH 776 (2), 786 (4) 932, 933 (1), CH 1122 (2), CH 1175 (4) CH 1240,
CH 1276, CH 1421 (2) PRE.
Garabedian CH 1218 (3), CH 1537 (2) PRE. Garside 6131, 6509,
6511, 6585 (3) BOL. Gilliland 215 (2) PRE. Glen 1674, 1675 (4) 1776,
2150, 2155, 2260, 2422, 2423, 2424, 2425, 3003, 3004, 3125 (2) PRE.
Glen & Reid 1724 (1) PRE.
Hardy 930 (4) PRE. Hardy et al. 5377C (2) PRE. He an 3660 (1)
PRE. Hendry 9 (2) PRE. Henkel CH 762, 2558 (4) PRE. Hepburn CH
1262 (2) PRE.
Jacot Guillarmod CH 3673 (2) PRE. Junod 794 (2) PRE.
Koekemoer 106 (2), 284a, 295, 316, 318, 757, 869 (3), 974 (4) PRE.
Kresfelder CH 163 (4) PRE.
Leighton CH 1216 (2) PRE. Liebenberg CH 2851 (4) PRE.
Magill 6370 (2) PRE. Malan 54611 (3) BOL. Marais 832 ( 1) PRE.
Michell 8 (3) PRE. Miller CH 4249 (4), CH 4250 (2), 7869 (1) PRE.
Mogg CH 158, CH 197, CH 1191, CH 1192, 4227, 4624 (2), 12557,
37642 (4) PRE. Mohle 315 (4) PRE. Morley 287, 297, 309 (3) PRE.
Mott 861 { 1 ) PRE.
Newton 25a (4) G.
Obenneyer TM 1940c, CH 3110 (4) PRE. Oliver 1474 (3) BOL,
7762 (2), 8854, 8877 (3) PRE.
Pegler 1356, 2150 (2) PRE. S.M. Perold 98, 100, 258 (2), 494, 509,
521, 522, 531, 610, 635, 646 (3), 685 (4) 686, 863 (2), 1457, 1603, 1899,
1909, 1934, 1992, 1997, 2040a, 2387, 2418 (3), 2482, 2487, 2488, 2572
(2), 2632, 2633 (4) 2703 (2), 2787, 2789 (3), 2800 (1), 2979, 2986 ( I ),
2986a, 3000 (2), 3001 (1) PRE. Perold & Koekemoer 2825 (2), 2830a,
2836 (4) 2848, 2855, 2856 (2), 2874 (4) 2877, 2898 (2), 2911 (4) 2913
(2), 2914 (4) 2916, 2917, 2919 (2), 2921 (4) 2934, 2946, 2947, 2951.
2960, 2968 ( 1 ), 2970, 2971 (2), 3030 (3) PRE. Phelan 375 (2) PRE.
Pieterse 16 (3) PRE. Pillans 3991 (3) BOL, PRE.
Reid 969, 1012 (1) PRE.
Schelpe 2043, 4009 (2), 4063 (4) 4735, 4918a (3), 5255 (1) BOL,
5359 (2) PRE, 5650 (4) 6028 (2) BOL, 7729, 7792, 8045 (3) BOL. Scott
24 (2) PRE. Sim. T.R., CH 1160, CH 1198 (2), CH 1205 (4) CH 1206,
CH 1208, CH 1210, CH 1213, CH 1215 (2), CH 1224 (4) CH 1226,
CH 1239, CH 1244, CH 1245, CH 1246, CH 1247, CH 1248, CH 1250
(2), CH 1251 (4) CH 1252, CH 1254, CH 1455 (2), CH 1260 (3), CH
1263, CH 1265, CH 1268 (2), CH 1269, CH 1273, CH 1274 (4) CH
1297, 8147 (2) PRE. Smook 6422, 8237 (1) PRE. Stirton 8967 (4) 8992
(2), 91 16 (3) PRE. Stoneman CH 1219 (2) PRE. Symons 8247 (2) PRE.
Thomas CH 947, CH 948 (2), CH 2869 (3) PRE.
University Durban-Westville 46, 49, 50 (2) PRE.
Van der Bijl 3, CH 1202, CH 1207, CH 1227 (2) PRE. Van der
Merwe CH 232 (4) PRE. Van der Schijff 5131, 5860 (4) PRE. Van Rooy
781 (2), 1088 (1), 1289, 1348 (2), 1389, 1630 (4) 1696, 1822, 1830 (1),
2461 (2), 2716, 2930 (1), 3134, 3139 (2), 3144, 3580, 3609 (1) PRE.
Van Vuuren 1476 (4) PRE. CM. Van Wvk 2561 (3) PRE. Veltman &
Potgieter 15 (4) 134 (2) PRE. Venter 8611 (2) PRE. VI ok 2675 (3) PRE.
Volk 00640 (4) Herb. Volk 84/651 (1) M, PRE.
Wagener CH 13241 (2) PRE. Wager Bequest CH 250, CH 251 (2),
CH 3691 (3), CH 3806 (4) PRE. West CH 3667 (2) PRE. Wilms G 1664
(1), G 001666 (lectotype), 02458 (1), G 024590 (4) G.
( Eyles 932, 933 and Miller 7869 are from Zimbabwe)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
My gratitude to Dr R. Grolle and Mr D.G. Long for
refereeing this article and for their helpful suggestions. I
also wish to thank the curators of BOL and G for the loan
of specimens. Dr T. Bornefeld for the chromosome counts
of Asterella muscicola and A. bachmannii, the artist, Ms
A. Pienaar, the typists, Mesdames J. Mulvenna and J.
Veldman, and the photographer, Mrs A. Romanowski. My
colleagues at NBI are warmly thanked for collecting
specimens.
REFERENCES
ARNELL, S.W. 1957. Hepaticae collected in South West Africa by Prof.
Dr O.H. Volk. Mitteilungen der Botanischen Stoats sammlung,
Miinchen : 16: 262-272.
ARNELL, S.W. 1963. Hepaticae of South Africa. Swedish Natural
Science Council, Stockholm.
ARNOLD, T.H. & DE WET, C. (eds) 1993. Plants of southern Africa:
names and distribution. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South
Africa No. 62.
BEST, E.B. 1 990. The Bryophyta of Zimbabwe — an annotated checklist.
Kirkia 13: 293-318.
BISCHOFF, G.W. 1844. In M.A. Seubert, Flora Azorica.
BIZOT, M„ DURY, M.N. & POCS, T. 1976. East African biyophytes, II.
Acta Botanica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 22: 1-8.
CORDA, A.K.J. 1829. Genera hepaticarum. Die Gattungen der Leber-
moose. Beitrdge zur Naturgeschichte 12: 643-655.
EVANS, A.W. 1920. The North American species of Asterella. Contribu-
tions from the U.S. National Herbarium 20: 247-312.
FRYE, T.C. & CLARK, L. 1937. Hepaticae of North America. University
of Washington Publications in Biology 6: 1-162.
GOTTSCHE, C.M., LINDENBERG, J.B.G. & NEES AB ESENBECK,
C.G. 1844—1847. Synopsis hepaticarum. Hamburg, Meissner.
GRIFFITH, W. 1849. On the higher cryptogamous plants. Notulae ad
Plantas Asiaticas, Part 2: 285-352. Calcutta.
GROLLE, R. 1976. Verzeichnis der Lebermoose Europas und benach-
barter Gebiete. Feddes Repertorium 87: 171-279.
HASSEL DE MENENDEZ, G.G. 1962. Estudo de las Anthocerotales y
Marchantiales de la Argentina. Opera Lilloana 7: 1-297.
LONG, D.G. & GROLLE, R. 1992a. Studies on the genus Asterella P.
Beauv. (Hepaticae). 1. Nomenclatural history. Taxon 41: 65-69.
LONG, D.G. & GROLLE, R. 1992b. Proposal to conserve Asterella
(Hepaticae: Aytoniaceae) with aconserved type. Taxon 41: 1 14.
MAGILL, R.E. & SCHELPE, E.A. 1979. The bryophytes of southern
Africa. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 43.
MULLER, K. 1951-1958. Die Lebermoose Europas. Dr L. Rabenhorst's
Kryptogamen- Flora 6:41 6-47 1 .
NEES AB ESENBECK, C.G. 1820. Horae physicae Berolinenses collec-
tae ex symbolis virorum.
Bothalia 24,2 ( 1 994)
147
NEES AB ESENBECK, C.G. 1 838. Naturgeschichte der europdischen
Lebermoose 4: 259.
PALISOT DE BEAUVOIS, A.M.F.J. 1805. Asterelle (Bot.), Asterella.
Dictionnaire des sciences naturelles 3. Paris.
SCHIFFNER, V.F. 1893. Hepaticae. Die natiirlichen Pflanzenfamilien 1:
3-38. Leipzig.
SCHUSTER, R.M. 1992. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of North
America Vol. 6: 1—937. Field Museum of Natural History.
SIM, T.R. 1926. The Bryophyta of South Africa. Transactions of the
Royal Society of South Africa 15: 1—475.
SIM. T.R. 1931 . South African Bryophyta. Further notes. Transactions of
the Royal Society of South Africa 20: 15, 16.
STEPHANI F. 1876-1907. leones hepaticarum. P. Geissler (ed.). IDC
Microform Publishers, Zug, Switzerland.
STEPHANI, F. 1892. Hepaticae africanae. Hedwigia 31 : 122.
STEPHANI, F. 1894. Hepaticarum species novae V. Hedwigia 33: 7.
STEPHANI, F. 1899. Species hepaticarum. Fimbriaria. Bulletin de T
Herbier Boissierl: 84—110.
VANDEN BERGHEN, C. 1972. Hepatiques et Anthocerotees. Resultats
scientifiques de T exploration hydrobiologique du Basin Lac
Bangweolo & Luapula 8: 1-202.
VOLK, O.H. 1979. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Lebermoose (Marchan-
tiales) aus Siidwestafrika (Namibia) 1. Mitteilungen der Botani-
schen Staatssammlung, Miinchen 15: 223-242.
Bothalia 24,2: 149-152(1994)
Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from southern Africa. 7. The genus
Cryptomitrium (Aytoniaceae) and C. oreades sp. nov.
S.M. PEROLD*
Keywords: Aytoniaceae, Cryptomitrium, C. oreades, Hepaticae, Lesotho, Marchantiales, Reboulia , Reboulioideae, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
As far as is known, the rare genus Cryptomitrium is reported here for the first time for the whole continent of Africa with the
description of a new species, C. oreades, from the mountain Kingdom of Lesotho in southern Africa. The specimen, attributed
to the genus Reboulia from southern Africa, was misidentified.
UITTREKSEL
Die seldsame genus Cryptomitrium word hier, sover bekend, die eerste maal vir die hele vasteland van Afrika vermeld met
die huidige beskrywing van 'n nuwe spesie, C. oreades, vanaf die bergagtige Koninkryk van Lesotho in suidelike Afrika. Die
eksemplaar wat aan die genus Reboulia vanuit suidelike Afrika toegeskryf is, is verkeerd geidentifiseer.
Cryptomitrium Austin ex Underw. in Bulletin Illinois
State Laboratory of Natural History 2: 36 (1884); Schiffn.:
33 (1893); Steph. 221 (1899); M. Howe: 43 (1899); A.
Evans: 45 (1923); Hassel: 120 (1963). Type species: C.
tenerum (Hook.) Austin.
Platycoaspis Lind, in Lind. & Amell: 11 (1889).
Thalloid, smallish to medium-sized, margins purple,
thin, medianly thicker and rather flat to slightly concave,
green, in loose patches; at seepage, on soil overlying rocky
outcrops. Branches simple or rarely once pseudo-
dichotomously furcate; thickened over midrib, thinning
toward scalloped or irregularly crenate margins, laterally
striate from above; apex slightly notched, dorsally not
grooved along midline. Dorsal epidermis hyaline, cell
walls thickened, especially at the comers, but not bulging,
some cells containing an oil body; air pores simple, small,
slightly raised, surrounded by 3 concentric rings of cells
without radial thickening of the walls and leading below
into topmost layer of individual empty air chambers, in 2
or 3(4) storeys, bounding walls unistratose, chlorophyl-
lose; storage tissue with angular cells, not restricted to
keel; rhizoids of both kinds, smooth as well as pegged.
Scales dark red or reddish pink, in 2 forwardly directed
ventral rows, not imbricate, roughly triangular to transver-
sely rectangular, with 1 or 2(3) filiform appendages.
Autoicous. Antheridia in groups, sunken into dorsal tissue
along midline and opening into projecting, conical papil-
lae above. Catpocephalum single, raised on stalk with one
rhizoidal furrow, lacking air chambers and arising dorsally
at apical notch of thallus or ventrally along margin, head
disciform-round, with 1 or 2 layers of air chambers,
separated from one another by unistratose cell plates and
opening above via compound air pores; 3-6 capsules
borne below, protruding between membranous lips of in-
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001 .
MS. received: 1993-03-26.
volucres; capsular wall apically bistratose, inner cells with
thickening bands, remainder of wall unistratose, cells thin-
walled. Spores triangular-globular, winged, distal face
with ± reticulate ornamentation, or thick sinuate ridges;
proximal face with high, thin, conspicuous triradiate mark,
each facet with incomplete areolae. Elaters long, tapering,
bispiral.
Cryptomitrium oreades Perold , sp. nov.
Thallus statura mediocri, late linearis vel ovatus, dorso
viridi, marginibus tenuibus, striatis, crenatis; ventraliter
atropurpureus, utrimque costae serie squamarum prorsum
versarum, deltoidearum, purpurearum vel rubescentium,
appendicibus filiformibus. Cavemulae vacuae. Autoicus.
Androecium grex antheridiorum immersorum, cervicibus
exsertis. Carpocephalum disciforme, stipitatum, ventraliter
sub latere thalli exoriens, lateraliter emergens, prope an-
theridia, cum sulco unico rhizoidali. Sporae (77.5 )— 85 .0—
95.0 pm diametro, deltoideo-globulares, alatae, superficie
distali plerumque cristis crassis sinuatis, superficie
proximali nota triradiata gracili, alta; superficiebus
minoribus cristis incompletis. Chromosomatum numerus
ignotus.
TYPE. — Lesotho: 1 km from New Oxbow Lodge on
road to Mokhotlong, ± */2 km from bridge to the left,
along Tiholohatsi River, at interface between basalt rock
slope and grassy fringe, under large boulder in wet
seepage area on soil, in alpine heath-grassland, alt. ±
2 900 m, April 1994, Perold & Duckett 3228 (PRE, holo.).
Thallus medium-sized, broadly linear (Ligure 1A) to
oblong, sometimes apically rather wider; dorsally flat to
slightly concave along centre, green, toward margins
striate across with deep purple of ventral face showing
through thin dorsal tissue, walls of air chambers beneath
faintly visible, when wet; margins irregularly crenate to
wavy, flanks ventrally deep purple, incurved and arched
over or clasped together above dorsal epidermis, when
150
Bothulia 24.2 (1994)
FIGURE 1 . — Cryptomitrium oreades. Morphology and anatomy of thallus. A, dorsal face of thallus with carpocephalum on stalk emerging at side
of thallus; B, ventral face of thallus; C, carpocephalum seen from below; D, ventral scale; E, transverse section of stalk; F, transverse section
of thallus; G, air pore and surrounding cells seen from above; H, transverse section of air pore and dorsal cells; I, thin, unistratose portion of
wall; .1, bistratose apical portion of capsule wall with thickenings, from above; K, transverse section of bistratose portion of capsule wall.
A-C, E, F, l-K, Van Rooy 305 /; D, G, H, Perold & Duckett 3228. Scale bars: A-C, F, 1 mm; D, 500 pm; E, 250 pm; G-K, 50 pm.
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
151
dry; in loose patches, simple or once pseudodichotomous-
ly furcate. Branches mostly up to 12 x 3-5(-6) mm,
(450-)600-800 pm thick over midrib, laterally thinning
out into wings, apex slightly notched, purple filiform tips
of scale appendages reflexed over edge; margins thin,
acute; flanks sloping very obliquely upward and outward;
ventral face medianly rounded, on either side of midrib
with a row of apically directed, ± triangular to transversely
rectangular, purple or reddish scales (Figure IB).
Dorsal epidermis unistratose, cells hyaline, from above
oval or rounded or irregularly shaped, with trigones
prominent, but not bulging, walls slightly thickened, 25.0-
42.5 x 20.0-32.5 pm, in transverse section rectangular,
up to 35 pm high, vertical walls thick, with some cells
containing an oil body; marginal cells variable in shape,
27.5-30.0 x 32.5-50.0 pm; air pores simple, raised ± 25
pm above dorsal cells (Figure 1H), oval or round, up to
32.5 x 27.5 pm, surrounded by 3 concentric rings of cells,
walls not radially thickened (Figure 1G). innermost ring
consisting of 6-8 cells, thin-walled and wedge-shaped, ±
8.0 x 15.0 pm, collapsed and often fragmentary, next row
of cells transversely oblong, 15.0-17.5 x 27.5-35.0 pm.
partly overlying outer row of 6-8 cells, 17.5-25.0 x 27.5-
42.5 pm, these in turn partly overlying dorsal cells; as-
similation tissue 280^150 pm thick, medianly with 3
layers of vertical, empty air chambers (Figure IF), sloping
toward margins, 125-240 pm wide, Vi or more the thick-
ness of thallus, bounded by unistratose, chlorophyllose
walls, cells 20.0-37. 5(— 55.0) x 25.0-37.5 pm, occasional-
ly with an oil body; storage tissue 125-350 pm thick,
cells closely packed and angular, 35.0-62.5 pm wide, here
and there a few cells with an oil body, ± 30 pm wide,
almost filling cell; rhizoids arising from swollen, ventral
epidermal cells, mostly smooth and up to 25 pm wide,
others pegged, 10.0-22.5 pm wide. Scales dark red or
reddish pink, in 2 ventral rows on either side of midrib
(Figure IB), not imbricate, 300-410 x 600-750 pm,
roughly triangular (Figure ID) to transversely rectangular,
with 1 or 2(3) filiform appendages, 150-590 pm long, of
which basal cells in 2 rows, but soon just in a single
string, rectangular, ± 70 x 27 pm; cells along scale mar-
gins brick-shaped or polygonal, ± 27.5 x 62.5 pm, some-
times with slime papillae, 25.0 x 12.5 pm. projecting here
and there, cells in body of scale 5- or 6-sided, 50.0-75.0
x 22.5-37.5 pm, walls sometimes sinuous; 6-9 small clear
cells (the oil bodies no longer present), ± 17.5 x 22.5 pm,
scattered in between cells of scale.
Autoicous. Androecia in diffusely arranged groups of
antheridia (Figure 1 A) sunken into dorsal tissue, their con-
ical necks 200 pm wide at base and projecting ± 150 pm
above surface, each with an opening leading into an-
theridial cavity below. Carpocephalum raised on stalk,
mostly single, rarely two adjacent, disciform-round, not
lobed (Figure 1A), green, turning brown with age, 2. 5-4.2
mm in diameter, rather flattish on top. with one layer of
elongated air chambers, opening via compound air pores
encircled by 4 concentric rings of cells (2 above and 2
below surface), scattered oil cells present; 3-6 capsules
borne below (Figure 1C), each on short seta and initially
protruding only slightly through elongated radial clefts
which eventually widen, the lips becoming membranous
and functioning as an involucre; capsules globose, 1100
x 850 pm, basal %-3/4 um-shaped with delicate, hyaline.
unistratose wall, of which apical V4-V3 part bistratose
(Figure IK), forming an operculum that is shed at an an-
nulus by dehiscence, outer layer ± 37.5 pm thick, con-
tinuous with rest of thin-walled cells (Figure 1 1), 4- or
5-angled, ± 52.5-100.0 x 27.5M-0.0 pm, inner layer of
cells restricted to apical part, thicker- walled (Figure 1 J ),
smaller, 20.0-32.5 x 25.0-35.0 pm, with narrow,
brownish, rod-like thickenings (Figure 1 K); stalk of car-
pocephalum erect, arising ventrally from below flank of
thallus and emerging laterally, close to site of antheridial
group (Figure 1A), basally red and partly covered with
purple scales, otherwise yellowish, apically surrounded by
a few hyaline, filiform scales, with 1 rhizoidal furrow
(Figure IE), length 3-5 mm, diameter 400-490 pm, in
transverse section with cortical cells 12.5-17.5 x 12.5-
22.5 pm, outer wall rounded and slightly thickened,
medullary cells angular, closely packed ( 1 2.5— )25.0— 30.0
x 17.5-25.0 um. Spores light brown, semitransparent, tri-
angular-globular, (77. 5-)85. 0-95.0 pm in diameter, wing
7.5 pm wide, undulating and somewhat plicate (Figure
2D), margin irregular; distal face (Figure 2A-C) convex
with ornamentation hardly reticulate or with thick, sinuate
ridges up to 5 pm high, irregularly branched and wavy,
separated by deep fissures; proximal face (Figure 2D) with
conspicuous triradiate mark, thin, tortuous, ± 7.5 pm high,
extending onto wing, each facet with irregular, branching
ridges, forming incomplete areolae. Elaters light brown,
bispiral (Figure 2E, F), 210-275 pm long and 10 pm wide
at widest part, tapering to tips, 5 pm wide. Chromosome
number not known.
DISCUSSION
This species is characterized by a disciform-round car-
pocephalum. borne on an erect, uni-furrowed stalk which
arises ventrally at the margin and emerges laterally to the
thallus in close proximity to the dorsally situated an-
theridial group. Worldwide only two other species have
been described in this genus; firstly C. tenentm from
North America (Alameda, California, Washington and
Mexico) as well as from Costa Rica, Guatemala, Chile
and Argentina, and secondly C. himalayense (Kashyap
1915) from India (Mehra & Sokhi 1977). Cryptomitrium
oreades differs from the other two species mainly by the
lateral position of its stalk; in C. tenerum and C. hima-
layense the stalk is dorsally situated near the apex of the
thallus; their thalli are also thinner and more delicate than
those of our species. The genus Cryptomitrium is clas-
sified in the family Aytoniaceae and in the subfamily
Reboulioideae Grolle, together with Asterella, Mannia and
Reboulia. The genus Reboulia does not occur in southern
Africa (Perold 1994); Amelfs (1963) only record of it
from Rustenburg Kloof, Collins 775C, is a specimen of
Asterella wilmsii and was clearly misidentified. So far, C.
oreades is known from only two localities in Lesotho
(Figure 3), growing at high altitude in association with
the moss Gymnostomum aeruginosum J.E. Sm.
The specific epithet, oreades, is derived from the Greek
word 'oread', meaning 'mountain nymph' and was chosen
because of the mountainous location of this species.
152
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
FIGURE 2. — Cryptomitrium oreades. A-D, spores: A, distal lace; B. distal face seen from side; C, proximal face; D, side view. E, elater; F, part of
elater. A,‘ B, E, F, Van Rooy 3051 ; C, D, Perold & Duckett 3228. A, B, x 470 ; C, x 77; D, x 493; E, x 324; F, x 1990.
SPECIMEN EXAMINED
(excluding the type specimen, already mentioned)
LESOTHO. — 2828 (Bethlehem): 6 km from New Oxbow Lodge to
Mokhotlong, basalt outcrops, alpine heath-grassland, on soil, (-DC), Van
Rooy 3051 (PRE).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I wish to sincerely thank Prof. J.G. Duckett, Queen
Mary and Westfield College, London, for finding the
specimen which has been selected as the holotype, when
we were together in the field; also Dr and Mrs D.J.B.
Killick for accompanying me. My thanks also to my col-
league at NBI, Mr J. van Rooy, for collecting the first
specimen of Cryptomitrium oreades ; and to Dr R. Grolle
for discussions about the affinities of this taxon, after it
FIGURE 3. — Distribution of Cryptomitrium oreades in southern Africa.
was forwarded to him by kind intercession of Prof. O.H.
Volk, Wurzburg, to whom I had sent it first. The specific
epithet was suggested to me by Dr H.F. Glen, who also
wrote the Latin translation. I extend my gratitude to him
for both these favours, also to Miss M. Koekemoer,
curator at PRE, for accompanying me to Lesotho in 1993
when we failed to find more material of C. oreades, to
the artists, Ms G. Condy and Ms J. Kimpton; to the typist,
Mrs J. Mulvenna, and to the photographer, Mrs A. Roma-
nowski, for their valued contributions.
REFERENCES
ARNELL, S.W. 1963. Hepaticae of South Africa. Swedish Natural
Science Council, Stockholm.
EVANS, A.W. 1923. In North American Flora. Sptwerocarpales — Mar-
chantiales 14: 1-66.
HASSEL DE MENENDEZ, G.G. 1963. Estudio de las Anthocerotales y
Marchantiales de la Argentina. Opera Lilloana 7: 1-297.
HOWE, M.A. 1899. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotes of California.
Memoirs of the Torres Botanical Club 7: 1-208.
KASHYAP, S.R. 1915. Morphological and biological notes on new and
little known west Himalayan liverworts. III. The New Phytologist
14: 1-18.
LINDBERG, S.O. & ARNELL, H.W. 1889. Musci Asiae Borealis. 1.
Lebermoose. Kongelige Svenska vetenskapsakademiens handlin-
gar 23: 1-69.
MEHRA. P.N. & SOKHI, J. 1977. Embryology of Cryptomitrium
himalayense Kash. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory
43: 157-190.
PEROLD, S.M. 1994. Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from
southern Africa. 6. The genus Asterella and its four local species.
Bothalia 24: 133-147.
SCHIFFNER, V. 1893. Hepaticae. Die Natiirlichen Pflanzenfamilien 1:
3-141.
STEPHANI, F. 1899. Species hepaticarum. Bulletin de THerbier Boissier
7:221,222.
UNDERWOOD, L.M. 1884. Descriptive catalogue of the North
American Hepaticae, north of Mexico. Bulletin Illinois State
Laboratory of Natural History 2: 1-133.
Bothalia 24,2: 153-162 (1994)
A new serotinous species of Cliff ortia (Rosaceae) from the southwestern Cape
with notes on Cliff ortia arborea
E.G.H. OLIVER and A.C. FELLINGHAM
Keywords: Cliffortia, new species, serotiny, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
A remarkable new species, Cliffortia conifera E.G.H. Oliv. & Fellingham, from the Anysberg, Ladismith District, is
described and compared to its closest ally in the genus, Cliffortia arborea Marloth, which is widespread along the escarpment
of the Great Karoo from Calvinia in the north to Beaufort West in the southeast. It is unique in the genus for its serotinous
cone-like synflorescences which are borne on determinate lateral branchlets occurring in zones on the main branches. A similar
serotinous condition exists in C. arborea, but the inflorescence axis is the main branch. The serotinous inflorescences are
complex synflorescences consisting of numerous, highly condensed, double racemes (homoeothetic dibotrya). To date
serotinous inflorescences have not been recorded in Cliffortia. C. arborea and C. conifera are included in section Arboreae, the
description of which is emended here.
UITTREKSEL
’n Merkwaardige nuwe spesie, Cliffortia conifera E.G.H. Oliv. & Fellingham, van die Anysberg, distrik Ladismith, word
beskryf en vergelyk met sy naaste verwant in die genus, Cliffortia arborea Marloth, wat wydverspreid voorkom op die Groot
Karoo-platorand vanaf Calvinia in die noorde tot by Beaufort-Wes in the suidooste. Dit is uniek in die genus vanwee die
serotiniese, keelagtige bloeiwyses (synflorescences) wat gedra word op laterale takkies met beperkte groei, wat in sones op die
hooftakke voorkom. 'n Sooitgelyke serotiniese toestand bestaan by C. arborea maar die as van die bloeiwyse is die hooftak. Die
serotiniese bloeiwyses is komplekse ‘synflorescences’ wat uit vele, hoogs gekondenseerde dubbele raseme (homoeotetiese
dibotrya) bestaan. Serotiniese bloeiwyses is nog nie voorheen by Cliffortia aangeteken nie. C. arborea en C. conifera word
geplaas in seksie Arboreae die beskrywing waarvan hier hersien word.
INTRODUCTION
The genus Cliffotlia is a prominent element in the fyn-
bos vegetation of the Cape Floral Region. With a total of
110 species it is one of the largest genera, and the over-
whelming majority of its species is endemic. It is surpris-
ing that Cliffortia, for its size, is the only representative
of the Rosaceae in the fynbos.
The genus has been well researched by Weimarck in
a number of publications since his expedition to southern
Africa in 1930, the major one being his revision of the
genus (Weimarck 1934). Since Weimarck's work there has
been much collecting of fynbos elements, particularly on
the mountains by Elsie Esterhuysen of the Bolus Her-
barium. This has resulted in a large accumulation of
material in the Cape herbaria which has needed thorough
curation by the second author at the Stellenbosch Her-
barium (STE). It is showing that the collecting and record-
ing of male, female and fruiting material for every species
needs special attention for a complete understanding of
the species and their relationships. It has also resulted in
the detection of numerous species complexes and in the
uncovering of a number of new species.
Some unusual material with 'galled' branchlets (Van
Wyk 1072 ) was collected on a general collecting expedi-
* Stellenbosch Herbarium, National Botanical Institute, RO. Box 471,
Stellenbosch 7599.
MS. received: 1992-08-31.
tion of staff from the Stellenbosch Herbarium to the Anys-
berg near Ladismith in October 1982. The 'galled' branch
could not be identified at the time, so it was given to
Pauline Fairall (Bond) of the Compton Herbarium (NBG)
for an opinion. She suggested the genus Cliffortia and
noted that the ‘galls’ actually contained withered flowers.
The collection was placed in the Incertae in both herbaria.
Resulting from the current curation of Cliffortia, the first
author made a search in 1991 for fresh material of this
taxon and located a small population in the vicinity of
Van Wyk’s original locality.
An examination of this fresh material clearly showed
that we were dealing with a very distinct new species of
Cliffortia and a remarkable situation in which the female
flowers are borne in serotinous cone-like heads. This con-
dition had never before been recorded in the genus and
was very reminiscent of that occurring in the genus
Leucadendron R. Br. (Proteaceae) and Widdringtonia
Endl. (Cupressaceae). In old plants of Cliffortia the cone-
like heads are clearly retained on the plant for up to six
years after flowering (Figure 1 ).
In this paper we have followed the terminology used
by Weberling (1981, 1983) to describe the structure of the
inflorescences. The basic unit of flowers is a highly con-
densed raceme (botryum) of the third order, a second order
co-florescence. These racemes are aggregated into highly
condensed double racemes (dibotrya) which in turn are
clustered into a compact syntlorescence in the form of
either a cone-like head or a subterminal zone.
154
Bothalia 24,2 ( 1994)
FIGURE 1. — Photograph of female
synflorescences in Cliffortia
conifera (left) showing three
zones (years) of cones on
short, secondary flowering
branchlets, Oliver 10055 and
in C. arborea (right) showing
five years of conoid synflores-
cences on proliferating main
branch, three on upper half of
branch and two on lower half.
Oliver 10054.
TAXONOMY
Cliffortia conifera E.G.H. Oliv. & Fellingham, sp.
nov. in genere singularis et distinctissima propter flores
suas femineas in synflorescentibus strobilinis lignosis in
extremis ramulorum lateralium breviorum noninnovan-
tium praesentes, ad sectionem Arboreae pertinens sed a
specie unica C. arborea Marloth, strobilorum positione
structuraqne solum in ramulis secundariis determinatis,
strobilorum foliis involucratis lignosis semipermanen-
tibus, foliis latioribus interdum dentatis, indumento den-
siore brevioreque incano-floccoso differt.
Frutex erectus lignosus ad 4 m altus cortice griseo
desquamato. Rami incano-floccosi glabrescentes. Folia 3-
foliolata, vagina lata omnino vaginanti, incano-floccosa;
stipulae subulatae 0. 5-2.0 mm longae, base puberulae
glabrescentes; foliola ( 10—) 1 2— 1 7(— 1 8) x (2)3-6(-9) mm,
anguste elliptica vel anguste ovata ad ovata, integra inter-
dum [2]3[4]-lobata, marginibus abaxialiter parvum
revolutis, incano-floccosa, adaxialiter glabrescentia,
apicibus acutis subulatis subula 0.25-1.50 mm longa. /n-
florescentia mascula: racemosa condensata lloribus 3 vel
4(5) in extremis brachyblastorum in ramulis inferioribus.
Flores masculi brevissime pedicellati; bractea ad 1 .5 mm
longa, anguste triangularis ciliata; sepala 2. 8-3. 2 x 1 .8-3.0
mm, late elliptica vel subcircularia ad late obovata, apice
subacuto crasso, exteme lanata ad villosa; stamina 6-9;
filamenta 3. 5-5.0 mm longa, filiformia glabra; antherae
1.0 x 1.2 mm. Inflorescentia feminea: multa di bo try a in
syn-florescentias strobilinas obovoideas, interdum sphae-
roideas in extremo ramuli brevis lateralis, strobili juvenes
12 x 12-30 x 22 mm albo-flavovirentes, veteres plerum-
que 25 x 25 mm, griseovirides, omnes incani; folia
primaria strobili l(3)-foliolata, vagina latissima, stipulis
brevissimis lateralibus subulatis vel sine stipulis, ciliata,
dense lanata abaxialiter, glabra adaxialiter, foliolis 0.5-2.0
mm longis; folia secundaria strobili unifoliolata circum
florescentias (botrya) involucrata, 5-10 x 3-5 mm, initio
oblique obovoidea mollia demum elongato-ovoidea lig-
nosissima, subula apicali intro aspicienti, dense et breve
lanata, basaliter glabra ciliata; axis florescentiae truncatus
longe villosus floribus 5-18 in florescentiis capitulatis in
extremis planis axium tertiorum aggregatae his in dibot-
ryis 4-6 in extremis axium secundariorum aggregatis.
Flores feminei pro maxime parte occulti; bractea ad 1.5
mm longa vel absens, elongato-triangularis ciliata;
pedicellum 0. 1-0.2 mm longum; sepala 3 vel 4, 1. 7-2.0
x 0.3 mm, linearia subacuta ad obtusa, apicaliter externe
lanata aliter glabra, erecta ad parum patentia; recep-
taculum 0.9- 1.2 mm longum, obovoideum, 3^f cristis vel
alis angustis, glabrum; stigma 1 linearis planoconvexa
4.5-5 .0 x 0.2-0.25 mm, torta, in dimidio superiore ir-
regulariter dentata, alba marginibus rubris. Fructus 1.8-
3.5 x 0.8- 1.0 mm, irregulariter ellipsoideus ad ovoideus,
brunneus glaber, 3 vel 4 alis vel cristis angustis lon-
gitudinalibus pallide flavis. Figurae 2 & 3.
TYPE. — 3220 (Montagu): Ladismith Dist., Anysberg,
E end above Prinskloof, 1 300 m, (-BC), 4-06-1992,
Oliver 10055 (STE, liolotype; BOL, K, PRE, isotypes; all
male & female).
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
155
Woody erect shrubs up to 4 m tall with main trunk up with crisped branched hairs submedially attached, the
to 150 mm in diameter with dark grey, flaking bark, plants hairs falling off with age. Leaves 3-foliolate with broad
regenerating from a lignotuber. Branches incano-floccose totally sheathing incano-floccose vagina remaining on
FIGURE 2. — Ctiffortiaconifera. A, branch with female cones in flower, x 1 ; B, male branchlet with flowers, x 1 ; C, leaf with lobed leaflets, adaxial
view, x 3; D, leaf with entire leaflets, adaxial view, x 3; E, leaflet, adaxial view, x 3; F, male flowers, x 3; G, trifoliolate primary cone leaf,
adaxial view, x 6; H, unifoliolate primary cone leaf, adaxial view, x 6; I, outer secondary cone leaf, lateral & adaxial views, x 6; J. innermost
secondary cone leaf, partially lateral adaxial view, x 6; K, bracts of female flowers, x 12; L, female flower, x 12; M, fruit, x 12. All drawn
from the type, Oliver 10055 (STE).
156
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
branches after leaflets have been shed and giving seg-
mented appearance to branches; stipules subulate from 0.5
mm long in young leaves to 2.0 mm in old leaves, remain-
ing on vagina for some time after leaflets have been shed,
hairy in lower part becoming totally glabrous, cream to
reddish; leaflets ( 10— ) 12— 1 7(— 1 8) x (2)3— 6(— 9) mm, nar-
rowly elliptic or narrowly ovate to ovate, mostly entire,
occasionally [2]3|4]-lobed, with margins slightly revolute
abaxially, completely incano-floccose when young soon
becoming glabrous mostly on apical half of upper surface
and margins and remaining incano-floccose on lower sur-
face, all apices acute and subulate, subula 0.25-1.50 mm
long, colourless or reddish. Inflorescence (male): a con-
densed raceme of 3 or 4(5) flowers on a villous highly
reduced brachyblast in axil of a subapical leaf of lower
lateral branches situated well below apex of main
branches. Flowers (male) very shortly pedicellate, creamy
white; bract up to 1.5 mm long, narrowly triangular, long
ciliate, whitish soon turning brown; sepals 2.8-3.2 x 1.8-
3.0 mm, broadly elliptic or subcircular to broadly obovate
with apex subacute thickened, mostly reflexed, villous to
lanate outside; stamens 6-9; filaments 3. 5-5.0 mm long.
FIGURE 3. — Clijforlia conifera. Photograph of female branch of
holotype prior to pressing, showing cones in flowering stage
(Oliver 10055), x 0.5.
filiform glabrous; anthers 1.0 x 1.2 mm. Inflorescence
(female): many condensed double racemes (homoeothetic
dibotrya) aggregated into an obovoid, occasionally sphae-
roid, cone-like synflorescence at end of a short lateral
branchlet, these cones ( 1— )4 — 1 0 in a subterminal zone on
main branches, rarely on secondary branches, young cones
12 x 12-30 x 22 mm whitish yellow-green and old mature
cones mostly 25 x 25 mm dull grey-green, all incanous,
older fruiting cones retained for up to 6 years, vegetative
region between zones 50-80 mm long, occasionally up to
300 mm; leaves of primary cone axis (primary cone
leaves) (3-)l-foliolate, with very broad vagina, with or
without short lateral subulate stipules, ciliate, densely and
shortly lanate abaxially, glabrous adaxially, leaflets 0.5-
2.0 mm long, reduced otherwise foliaceous, inner with an
expanded sheathing base; dibotrya of 4-6 co-florescences
of second order with axis 0.5-2. 0 mm long; leaves of
secondary cone axis (secondary cone leaves) unifoliolate,
arranged involucre-like around florescences (botrya), 5-10
x 3-5 mm, at first obliquely obovoid and soft, becoming
elongate-obovoid and very woody, reducing in size
towards axis, with inwardly pointing apical subula, ovoid,
attenuated into a long stout terminal subula, apically
greenish densely and shortly lanate, basally white glabrous
and ciliate; co-florescence (botryum) highly condensed
with 5-18 flowers in a capitulum-like arrangement, axis
very short, truncate, long villous. Flowers ( female ) mostly
hidden; bract up to 1.5 mm long or absent, very thin,
elongate triangular, long ciliate, brownish; pedicel 0. 1-0.2
mm long; sepals 3 or 4, 1 .7-2.0 x 0.3 mm, linear subacute
to obtuse, lanate outside apically otherwise glabrous, erect
to slightly spreading, colourless; receptacle 0.9-1. 2 mm,
obovoid, with 3-4 longitudinal narrow ridges or wings
ending in small apical bulges, glabrous; style 1, linear,
planoconvex, 4.5-5.0 x 0.2-0.25 mm, curled and twisted,
exserted from cone, white, edged in upper half with short
irregular red stigmatic teeth. Fruit 1. 8-3.5 x 0.8-1. 0 mm,
irregularly ellipsoid to ovoid, dark brown and glabrous
with 3 or 4 yellowish longitudinal narrow ridges or wings,
apically emarginate, retained within cone for several years
after flowering period. Figures 2 & 3.
The closest ally to C. conifera is C. arborea. C. con-
ifera possesses female flowers borne in condensed cone-
like structures, in a different position to those of C.
arborea. Herbarium material of C. arborea was rather in-
adequate for a thorough investigation and is also extreme-
ly difficult to handle due to its toughness and spikiness.
A trip was therefore made to collect fresh material of both
species in June 1992 in order to analyse and compare the
structures in detail.
Weimarck created the section Arboreae to provide a
place for the unusual tree-like species, C. arborea, which
had been described by Marloth in 1905. He noted that the
species possesses several unique morphological charac-
ters. He described the flowers as ‘closely clustered in
groups of 5-8 in the axils of simple leaves on very con-
tracted twigs’. These he noted were bunched together in
such a way as to give the impression of a ‘spadix’. This
clearly points to the elongated compact cone-like structure
that is present on those herbarium sheets which are fertile,
but does not fully reflect the situation in nature. All fertile
female herbarium material seen by us possesses a single
subterminal ‘spadix’ or ‘cone’ on a single branch. In the
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
157
wild, branches may possess only a single subterminal
cone, but others can have a series of cones spread along
their main axis (Figures 1 & 4A). Needless to say the former
are far easier to collect and press. The single cone situation
shown by Marloth and present on all the herbarium material
collected before our investigation, occurs only when an ac-
tively growing branch flowers for the first time. The spread
of cones along a stem clearly showed that the current, flower-
ing cone was subapically situated with the other cones lower
down in a series at close intervals with each successive cone
representing a previous year’s inflorescence. Weimarck was
therefore unaware of the retention of the inflorescences for
a number of years following their initial formation during
the flowering period. We therefore prefer to use the term
‘cone’ for C. arborea , particularly when C. conifera is taken
into account.
A detailed examination of the cones of both species
showed that they are very similar in their structure and
differ mainly in their position on the main branches. In
C. arborea the primary axis of the cone is the main rela-
tive branch which elongates beyond the cone and also
laterally via sterile, lateral, secondary branchlets within
the cone, whereas in C. conifera the primary axis of the
cone is a secondary lateral branch which is determinate
in growth and devoid of any lateral vegetative branching.
The development of lateral branches from the cones in
C. arborea is clearly shown in the photograph published
with the protologue by Marloth (1905) and in the upper-
most cone in Figure 1. His photograph shows numerous
very short, lateral, leafy branchlets which conceal the true
nature of the female compound inflorescence underneath.
The cones are complicated structures which require
careful dissection for analysis. A simplified diagram of
the cones from both species is summarized in Figure 4.
In this we have followed the terminology of Weberling
(1983). The order of branching refers only to the branch-
ing of the inflorescence and not to the rest of the plant.
The cones are polytelic synflorescences composed of
numerous, condensed, sessile, racemes (botrya), up to 50
per cone, the co-florescences (Figure 4C & D) which are
grouped together in highly condensed double racemes
(dibotrya) (Figure 4B & B'). The co-florescences resemble
capitula with up to 16 flowers all arising at the same level
from the truncated end of the very short, 3rd order, flores-
cence axis. The flattened end of this axis is covered by
long erect hairs from which the bracteoles just emerge.
The subtending secondary cone leaves on the 2nd order
axes are very different from the normal vegetative leaves
and are considerably thickened and eventually become
woody (Figures 21 & J; 5D). These enlarged, woody, in-
volucral leaves form the basic matrix of the cone and
almost completely cover the female flowers with only the
stigmas protruding in most cases. There is another type
of leaf in the cone and these we refer to as the primary
cone leaves (Figures 2G & H; 5C). They are situated on
the main or primary axis of the cone (1st order inflores-
cence branch) and subtend the lateral 2nd order dibotrya.
In C. conifera these primary cone leaves are unifoliolate,
occasionally trifoliolate, but they are always trifoliolate in
C. arborea. In the latter species some of the leaflets of
these primary cone leaves may be shed, but the scars in-
dicate that the original condition was trifoliolate.
Further differences in the cones occur between the
secondary cone leaves. In C. conifera they are mostly
obovoid in shape with a stiff, apical, adaxially pointing
subula. They are at first softish, but become woody and
remain intact in the cone for the life of the cone (± 6
years). In C. arborea they are widest at the middle with
the upper portion narrowing, foliaceous and reflexed and
with an apical, more or less erect subula. They are softish,
not becoming very woody and after several seasons
abscise at the top of the sheath. Thus in C. arborea the
old cones retain only the flattened bases of the secondary
cone leaves and are considerably narrower than the
flowering and fruiting cones.
Female cones are therefore found only in these two
species in the genus. The possibility of other species
having a similar character, but not recorded, was not dis-
counted. Clearly one is drawn to the species C. strobilifera
L. on account of its name. This is a common widespread
species which bears small ovoid ‘cones’ at various points
on the plant. These are just vegetative galls having no
connection with the position of flowers which are borne
singly over the normal branches. Another species that at-
tracts attention is C. heterophylla Weim. which has two
distinctly different types of leaves on the plant and these
are associated with the flowers. The majority of leaves
are linear-lanceolate whereas considerably broader ovate
leaves occur in long terminal zones. The female flowers
occur in the axils of these broader leaves. The whole ap-
pearance of the branches is rather cone-like but not com-
parable with those found in the section Arboreae.
Weimarck (1934: 170) drew attention to the existence
of a true inflorescence in only three species in the genus,
C. arborea, C. odorata L. f. and C. hirsuta Eckl. & Zeyh.
In the latter two species the flowers, 5-15, occur in con-
tracted racemes which he noted ‘approach the form of
heads’. He also noted that male and female flowers are
frequently found in the same inflorescence. However, in
a later review of the genus (Weimarck 1948) he placed
the two species in a division of his key which described
the flowers as ‘at least the male, fascicled in the leaf axils’.
He included two new species in this group, C. discolor
Weim. and C. viridis Weim., but made no mention of their
inflorescences in either the descriptions or the discussions.
The cone -bearing zones on the plants of C. conifera
vary considerably depending on how vigorously the
branches are growing. Most have 5-8 cones in the zones,
but there can be as few as one or as many as 1 1 (Figure
1). The vegetative region between the zones is usually
50-80 mm long with vegetative lateral branchlets
developed there, but it can be as short as 30 mm or as
long as 300 mm in vigorously growing branches. These
observations were made on the few, mature, cone-bearing
adult plants in the type population.
Apart from the differences in the cones, the leaves in
C. conifera are visibly very different from those in C.
arborea which are much wider and erect-spreading. The
appearance of the plants is remarkably similar to some
species in the genus Phylica L. in the Rhamnaceae. In C.
arborea the leaves are linear, needle-like and very
revolute, in fact very ericoid, and also falcate. The
recurved nature of these leaves is very marked on the
158
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
FIGURE 4. — Longitudinal diagrams of architecture and structure of synflorescence. A, B, Cliffortia arborea: A, three conoid synflorescences on
main branch and two minor synflorescences on lateral branches; B, part of synflorescence showing three dibotrya. A', B', C. conifera: A',
two zones of four and five conoid synflorescences on lateral truncate branches; B', part of synflorescence showing four dibotrya. C, D, single
co-florescence or botryum (solid square) with its seven individual flowers (open circles). MA, main or primary axis; FB, flowering secondary
branches; VB, vegetative secondary branches; SN, synflorescence; DB, dibotryum; CoF', co-florescence or botryum; pci, primary cone leaf;
scl, secondary cone leaf; br, bract of single flower; zoned lines in synflorescences in A & A' represent dibotrya; dotted zigzag lines in B, B',
C & D represent expanded highly condensed axes; solid squares represent botrya, and circles, single flowers.
Bothalia 24.2 ( 1 994)
159
FIGURE 5. — Cliffortia arborea. A. leaf, adaxial view, x 3; B, leaf with foliaceous stipules from region just below synflorescence, abaxial view, x
6; C, primary cone leaf with third leaflet shed, adaxial view, x 6: D, secondary cone leaf, lateral/adaxial view, x 6; E, fruit, x 12. All drawn
from Oliver 10054 (STE).
main branches just below the young cones where even
the stipules become foliaceous and recurved (Figure 5B).
The leaves in C. conifera are, however, problematic in
that there is a clear difference between those of the col-
lections from the type population and those of Van Wyk
1072. The leaflets on the latter collection are mostly linear,
1 .0—1 .6[2.0J mm wide, and revolute with no broad open-
backed examples. Even a long period of softening by boil-
ing in water with softener added, does not render them
any broader. In the collections from the type population
the leaflets are mostly much broader, (2)3— 6(9) mm wide,
with only the occasional leaflet being more linear. The
width of the leaflets in the dried collections tends to be
slightly narrower than in the fresh state. This distinct dif-
ference is puzzling seeing that we have been unable to
relocate the site at which Van Wyk made her collection.
Until such time as this has been rediscovered and the
plants studied in the field, we are unable to assess this
clear disjunction and have therefore excluded it from the
type description.
Marloth described the hairs on C. arborea as Mal-
phigian hairs, i.e. hairs which are attached by their middle;
two-branched hairs according to Weimarck (1934). Both
species have these hairs on the branches and leaves. The
hairs are very flat in the middle portion where they are
very flimsily attached to the surface and are easily
removed when touched. The two ends are curled and
somewhat erect. In C. conifera the hairs are very closely
packed whereas in C. arborea they are longer and sparser.
The bracts of the female flowers in Cliffortia are usual-
ly well developed and amplexicaul, enveloping the base
of the flower (Weimarck 1934). In C. conifera and C.
arborea the bracts are much reduced to nonexistent and
are flat, only slightly curved in the largest examples. They
are placed on the flattened end of the axis of the co-flores-
cences (botrya) between the closely packed flowers in a
manner similar to that in the Asteraceae. Being surrounded
by long transparent hairs and being themselves covered
with long hairs, they are very difficult to locate and ex-
amine especially when they are reduced to mere vestiges.
Marloth ( 1905) described the female flowers of C. ar-
borea as having a solitary style with one white, non-
plumose stigma. Weimarck (1934) described the stigma
as linear and a little branched which is unique for the
genus in which most of the species have showy, plumose,
red stigmas. He regarded the basal nonplumose portion
as the style which in most species is very short. C. coni-
fera and C. arborea have identical style/stigma configura-
tions. The style/stigma is an elongate-linear, planoconvex,
white organ with very short irregular teeth on the edges
in the upper three-quarters to half and an acute, red apex
(Figure 2L). The actual position of the stigmatic surfaces
in these two species is not clear to us and so we refer to
the structure as a style/stigma. In the other species of
Cliffortia the lateral hairs are very well developed and
Weimarck refers to the region in which these occur as the
stigma. This problem will need careful examination of
fresh material of both species to ascertain the position of
trapped germinating pollen grains.
The type population of C. conifera consists of about
50 plants, most of which had been burnt off by a fire
some five years previously. There were only eight mature
plants which survived the fire and which were flowering.
The plants which had been burnt were all regenerating
from a basal lignotuber, but even though the strongest
growing one was already 1.5 m tall, none had produced
any cones. The oldest plant was growing protected among
large boulders and was about 4 m tall, or rather, long,
seeing that it was growing out diagonally from between
the boulders.
Cliffortia arborea Marloth in Botanische Jahr-
biicher 39: 318 (1905); Weim.: 91 (1934). Type: Africa
australis, in rupibus montium regionis Roggeveld dictae,
alt. 1 500 m. Oct., Marloth 3907 (Bt. holo.; BOL female!.
160
Bothalia 24,2 ( 1994)
K! male, P male [sec. Weimarck], STE! sterile). Lectotype
here designated, Marloth 3907 (BOL female).
Stipules 0-2, subulate or below synflorescences subu-
late to foliaceous. Inflorescence (male): a condensed
raceme of 2^4 flowers on a brachyblast in the axil of a
normal vegetative leaf. Male flowers: sepals 3, 4 x 3 mm
in the largest specimen seen, abaxially lanate, apex sub-
ulate; stamens 8-10. Inflorescence (female): an ellipsoid
cone-like synflorescence of condensed double racemes
(dibotrya) consisting of sessile capitulum-like co-flores-
cences (botrya), the synflorescence borne on the main
branch with continued apical growth, with 2nd order axes
continuing growth laterally and sometimes forming a
secondary cone or male florescences in subsequent
seasons; primary cone leaves trifoliate, stipules absent to
well developed and foliaceous; secondary cone leaves
unifoliolate, 12 mm long reducing in size towards axis of
dibotryum, basally sheathing, medially ovoid, shortly
lanate, distally cylindric, glabrescent, apex subulate,
abscising at top of basal sheath in third or fourth year.
Several points which are at variance with Weimarck’s
description and do not concern the conoid inflorescences
which have been dealt with in detail under C. conifera,
need some discussion. Most of the material examined was
devoid of stout subuloid stipules. In most cases there is
very little indication of any stipules, but when they are
present they can be prominent. However, below the cones
they are usually well developed and even foliaceous. The
male flowers are not borne singly in the axils of vegetative
leaves but in groups of 2-4 on highly reduced short shoots
and have more anthers, 8-10 per llower, than were
recorded by Weimarck. The female flowers can have 3 or
4 sepals not just 3.
Both Marloth and Weimarck noted that C. arborea had,
in addition to the branched hairs of the indumentum,
pedunculate glands which produced a strongly aromatic
oil. We have not been able to observe any of these glan-
dular hairs on the material at our disposal and the fresh
material from the Komsberg and the Nuweveld Mountains
was not aromatic. We believe that Marloth must have con-
fused the aromatic nature of some of the plants which he
collected on his Roggeveld trip and this was repeated by
Weimarck who never handled any fresh material.
The production of short, sterile, 2nd order branches
within the current flowering synflorescence is peculiar to
this species. During the flowering period these lateral
branchlets characteristically appear just beyond the boun-
daries of the cone. In the following season these branch-
lets elongate considerably, as shown in Figure 4A, and
clearly visible in Figure I (right). In herbarium material
these branches appear to be all sterile. However, fresh
material from our own collections showed some very in-
teresting features. The collection from Komsberg ( Oliver
10054) possessed some laterals with small female
synflorescences shown in the diagram in Figure 4A. These
appeared to have flowered at the same time as the
synflorescence above them on the main axis, the second
one from the apex. One of the collections from the
Nuweveld Mountains (Fellingham 1625) possessed in-
stead, numerous male florescences on these lateral
branches.
Marloth did not state where his type collection was
housed. Weimarck (1934) gave the location of several
specimens of Marloth 3907 with male and female material
in B and BOL and only male material in K and P. The
only female specimen appears to be the one in BOL, be-
cause the material in B was destroyed during the Second
World War. There is no male material of Marloth 3907
in BOL as cited by Weimarck. We have therefore selected
the female collection of Marloth 3907 in BOL as the lec-
totype.
Marloth also gave no exact locality for the type col-
lection. However, in the discussion on the species he noted
that it occurred only on the southern end of the Roggeveld
on the Komsberg. The lectotype in BOL has appended to
it the original print of the habit/habitat photograph which
was published with the protologue. On the reverse it is
labelled in Marloth's own handwriting as taken on the
Komsberg at 1 550 m and the specimen is labelled as
‘southwestern krantzes on the Komsberg, 1 550 m’. It is
therefore clear that the Komsberg is the type locality for
the species.
In his discussion of the species Marloth noted that the
appearance of the short branchlets, i.e. those protruding
from the young female inflorescence, caused the local
people to give the plant the common name of ‘Starboom
(= Sternbaum)’ or rather sterboom. This has been cor-
rupted subsequently to ‘sterkboom’ as indicated by the
naming of several localities at the southeastern end of the
Roggeveld escarpment as Sterkboomkloof, Sterkboom-
plaat on the Trigonometrical Survey maps (1:250 000 &
1:50 000). However, the correct name is still included as
the original farm name ‘Sterboom Hoek 8’ on the map
322 1CA in the 1:50 000 series.
Since the discovery of the species, the distribution
range has been considerably extended by further collec-
tions from as far north as the Hantams Mountain near
Calvinia to the Nuweveld Mountains above Beaufort West
in the east. Marloth quoted information from the local
farmers in 1905 that the species used to be very common
along the edge of the escarpment, but with there being
no other woody plants in the whole area the species was
being used in considerable quantities for firewood. It is
now reduced to a few small populations in the southern
Roggeveld. In the Hantams area it was fairly common on
dolerite screes and krantzes in 1 955 according to Acocks
18621 with the populations above Akkerendam now in a
nature reserve controlled by the Calvinia Municipality.
Shearing ( Shearing 893) records the species as fairly com-
mon locally at Mountain View on the Nuweveld Moun-
tains which the second author confirmed during a visit to
the area. Fortunately the very good populations on the
Nuweveld Mountains occur in an area that now falls
within the recently established Karoo National Park where
the species is assured of the best possible protection.
Section Arboreae
The addition of the new species to the section Arboreae
and the changes to the description of C. arborea neces-
sitate the emending of the sectional description. The diag-
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
161
nostic feature of the section is now the serotinous, triple
botryoid, conoid synflorescence.
Section Arboreae H. Weim. emend. E.G.H. Oliv. &
Fellingham
Shrubs or small trees. Leaves trifoliolate; stipules 0-2,
subulate to foliaceous; leaflets revolute or flat, entire to
dentately 2-4-lobed. Inflorescence (male): a condensed
raceme of 2-5 flowers on a lateral highly condensed short
shoot in axil of vegetative leaf. Male flowers: sepals 3 or
4; stamens 6-10. Inflorescence (female): a conoid
synflorescence subterminally on main branches with con-
tinued apical growth (C. arborea) or apically on deter-
minate lateral short shoots (C. conifera ), the synflorescences
composed of condensed double racemes (dibotrya) each
consisting of condensed co-florescences (botrya). Female
flowers: sepals 3 or 4; receptacle triangular narrowed to
base, narrowly 3-winged or 3-ridged; style/stigma single,
linear, edges irregularly and shortly dentate; achene single.
Species included: Cliffortia arborea Marloth (type
species), C. conifera E.G.H. Oliv. & Fellingham.
PHYTOGEOGRAPHY
C. conifera is known only from the eastern end of the
Anysberg in the western part of the Ladismith District
where it grows at 1 300 m on steep, east-facing, summit
slopes on sandstones of the Nardouw subgroup of the
Table Mountain Group in the Cape Supergroup (SACS
1980). The associated vegetation is Mesic Mountain Fyn-
bos (Moll et al. 1984). The area falls within the Anysberg
Nature Reserve of the Cape Department of Nature & En-
vironmental Conservation. The weather station nearby on
the mountain has recorded an annual rainfall in the region
of 450 mm per annum which occurs throughout the year
with peaks in mid-winter, late spring and early autumn.
The nearest locality of its closest ally, C. arborea , is
90 km due north on the Roggeveld escarpment at the
Komsberg. This species is considerably more widespread
from the Hantams Mountains at Calvinia in the north
along the edge of the Roggeveld escarpment and
eastwards to the Nuweveld Mountains above Beaufort
West (Figure 6). In all cases it grows near the edges of
escarpments or in kloofs below the escarpments which
are at high altitude ranging from 1 500-1 800 m and sub-
jected to harsh climatic extremes of heat and drought in
summer and intense cold with several annual falls of snow
in winter. From the rainfall maps and the rainfall figures
available for nearby towns, it seems likely that the species
receives in the vicinity of 300 mm of rain per annum,
mostly in the winter months but occasionally in summer.
In the Roggeveld the escarpment is composed of sand-
stones and mudstones of the Adelaide subgroup of the
Beaufort Group in the Karoo Sequence with the Hantams
and Nuweveld Mountains being dolerite intrusions (SACS
1980). The record at the northern end of the Hantams
Mountain (Oliver 8878) was in a sheltered kloof at a lower
altitude of only 1 300 m. In all its localities it grows
amongst Karroid Shrubland (Moll et al. 1984) with no
representatives of Fynbos in the area.
Other species occurring like C. arborea on the interior
mountains of the southern Cape Province are C. han-
tamensis Diels, only from the Hantams Mountain and the
Roggeveld at Uitkyk, both C. arborea localities, and C.
ramosissima Schltr. from the Hantams Mountain, to the
high mountains near Graaff-Reinet and as far north as the
northern Drakensberg. Marloth (1905) pointed to the iso-
lated taxonomic, as well as geographic, position of C. ar-
borea and suggested that it is a relic of a former wider
distribution of the genus during pluvial periods. With the
discovery of the closely related C. conifera occurring in
the nearby Cape Floral Region with numerous other
species of Cliffortia , the linkup with the rest of the genus
is substantiated.
PHENOLOGY
C. conifera and C. arborea are monoecious with uni-
sexual male and female flowers borne on separate
branches. The female flowers are borne in terminal or
subterminal cones near the ends of the main branches.
The male flowers are borne in small groups in the axils
of vegetative leaves on lateral normal branches. In C.
conifera these male lateral branches are situated below
the female cones mostly lower down on the plant. In C.
arborea it is clear from the herbarium material that they
are also borne on lower lateral normal branches in this
species. Both male and female inflorescences were at-
tached to the same main branch with the male flowers
just below a single subterminal female cone (Acocks
18621; Marloth 9730) or on lateral branches emanating
from the lower older cones (Fellingham 1625) (see below
under C. arborea). These two species are clearly wind-
pollinated which is the syndrome presumed for all other
species of Cliffortia (Koutnik 1987). The position of the
flowers would indicate that updraughts of air would be
responsible for transferring the pollen to the female
flowers. This would fit in well with the habit and habitats
observed in the field where winds would come up from
below the plants on the edges of the escarpment or at the
foot of summit cliffs or in steepish kloofs.
FIGURE 6. — Known distribution of Cliffortia conifera , •; and C. ar-
borea, O.
162
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
The female flowers, except for the long, exserted,
strap-shaped style and stigma, are totally hidden from
view within the envelope of secondary cone leaves. After
pollination they remain in the cones protected by these
leaves which become quite woody in C. conifera. The
entire cone in this species may remain on the plant for as
long as six years after initial formation. At what stage the
fruits are shed is difficult to ascertain, but we believe that
this occurs during the second or third year following
flowering. In C. cirboreci the secondary cone leaves
abscise after about 3-4 years, apparently after the fruits
are shed. The flat-ended woody bases of the secondary
cone leaves remain on the main branch for several years
after that, indicating where the original ‘flowering’ cone
had been situated. It is clear that some additional monitor-
ing of the plants in the field is necessary to ascertain the
complete phenological cycle in both species.
The flowering in these species occurs at different times
of the year. In C. conifera the female and male flowers
are most prolific during the late summer and autumn
months from April to June with some of the female
flowers opening as late as August. In C. arborea we have
been able to examine freshly opened flowers ( Fellingham
1624, 1625), and deduce that the plants flower in late
spring and early summer from October to December. The
flowering of the latter species is therefore surprisingly
soon after the advent of warmer weather, seeing that it
occurs in the coldest regions of the southwestern Cape.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
C. conifera
WESTERN CAPE. — 3320 (Montagu): Ladismith, Anysberg, E end
above Prinskloof, 1 300 m, (-BC), 23-09-1990, Oliver 9730 (PRE, S,
STE, all female); ibid. 10-08-1991, Fellingham 1531 (STE female); ibid.
4-06-1992, Oliver 10055 (BOL, K, MO, PRE, STE, all male & female);
Anysberg, E end, gully leading to Prinsberg, (-DA), 6-10-1982, M. van
Wyk 1072 (NBG, STE, both female).
C. arborea
NORTHERN CAPE. — 3119 (Calvinia): Akkerendam, dolerite screes
& krantzes of Hantamsberg, 1 372 m, (-BD), 14-1 1-1955, Acocks 18621
(BOL male & female, K male & female, NBG male); summit of Hantam
Peak, 1 660 m, (-BC), Wisura 3556 (NBG sterile); Hantamsberg, Voet-
padskloof, S-facing slope, renosterveld, 1 465 m, (-BD), 3-09-1986,
Oliver 8878 (STE sterile); upper E slope of Hantam Mtn, Vanrhynshoek
Farm, kloof near stream, (-BD), 7-10-1986, Thomas & Van Jaarsvehl
8961 (NBG sterile). 3220 (Sutherland): Roggeveld, Farm Uitkyk,
Sneeuwkrans, below krantz facing W, 1 730 m, (-AD), 10-1920, Marloth
9730 (PRE stem & bark only, STE male & female); Hottentotsbank near
Sneeukrans, W-facing scree slopes, 1 433 m, (-AD), 22-09-1981, Rourke
1728 (K sterile, NBG sterile); Roggeveld, southwestern krantzes on the
Komsberg, 1 550 m, (-DB), 04-1905, Marloth 3907 (BOL female, K
male, STE sterile); Roggeveld Mtns, Komsberg, 1 525 m, (-DB), 10-
1920, Marloth 9770 (PRE female, STE female); just W of road at top
of Komsberg Pass, sandstone escarpment, (-DB), 22-09-1977, Moffett
1463 (STE sterile); plateau at top of Komsberg Pass, E of road, 1 600
m, (-DB), 1-03-1986, Moffett & Steensma 4067 (STE male); Komsberg
Pass, lower slopes ENE of Skurwekop, 1 500 m, (-DB), 4-06-1992,
Oliver 10054 (BOL, K, MO, PRE, S, STE, all female). Without precise
locality: mountains near Sutherland, 12-1905, Du'Toit sub BOL 10057
(BM, BOL, K, all sterile); Sutherland, shady side of very inaccessible
kloofs, 13-10-1969, De Villiers s.n. (NBG immature female). 3221 (Mer-
weville): Sterkboomkloof near Vinkfontein, edge of kloof, 1 500 m, (—
CA), 28-02-1986, Moffett & Steensma 4060 (STE sterile).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3222 (Beaufort West): Nuweveldberge,
Karoo National Park, Mountain View area near FM tower, SW slope,
1 830 m, (-BA), 17-11-1992, Fellingham 1624 (MO, PRE, STE, all
female); Karoo National Park, Mountain View, top of mountain, 1 830
m (-BA), 3-01-1985, Shearing 893 (PRE female); Nuweveld Mtns, S
slopes above Beaufort West, 1 525 m (-BC), 07-1940, Esterhuysen 2759a
(BOL sterile); Nuweveldberge, Karoo National Park, Mountain View area
near the Look Out, 1 830 m, (-BC), 17-11-1992, Fellingham 1625 (BM,
PRE, STE, all male & female).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We appreciate the valuable comments received from
Prof. Focko Weberling, one of the referees, and the dis-
cussions with Prof. Dietrich Miiller-Dobhes. We acknow-
ledge the co-operation of Alan Martin, officer-in-charge
of the Anysberg Nature Reserve, in our botanical work in
the Anysberg area.
REFERENCES
KOUTNIK, D. 1987. Wind pollination in the Cape flora. In A.G. Rebelo,
A preliminary synthesis of pollination biology in the Cape flora.
South African National Scientific Programmes Report No. 141:
126-133.
MARLOTH, R.H. 1905. Eine neue interessante Cliffortia vom Rog-
geveld. Botanische Jahrbiicher 39: 318, 319.
MOLL, E.J., CAMPBELL, B.M., COWLING, R.M., BOSSI, L„ JAR-
MAN, M.L. & BOUCHER, C. 1984. A description of major
vegetation categories in and adjacent to the Fynbos biome. South
African National Scientific Programmes Report No. 83. CSIR,
Pretoria.
SOUTH AFRICAN COMMITTEE FOR STRATIGRAPHY (SACS)
1980. Stratigraphy of South Africa. Part I . Handbook of Geologi-
cal Survey of South Africa 8.
WEBERLING, F. 1981. Morphologie der Bliiten und der Bliitenstande.
Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.
WEBERLING, F. 1983. Fundamental features of modern inflorescence
morphology. Bothalia 14: 917-922.
WEIMARCK, A.H. 1934. Monograph of the genus Cliffortia. Lund:
Gleerupska.
WEIMARCK, A.H. 1948. The genus Cliffortia, a taxonomical survey.
Botaniska Notiser 1948: 167-203.
Bothalia 24,2: 163-166(1994)
FSA contributions 1: Aquifoliaceae
S. ANDREWS*
Trees or shrubs. Leaves alternate, rarely opposite,
simple, mostly evergreen; stipules minute. Inflorescences
in axillary cymes. Flowers unisexual, regular, small,
sepals and petals usually fused at base, rarely free. Sepals
4— 6(— 8 ), imbricate. Petals 3-5 (-8), imbricate, white.
Stamens 4— 5(— 8 ), usually adnate to petals; anthers 2-
thecous. Ovary superior (2)4-6(-22)-locular; style ter-
minal; stigma capitate or discoid. Fruit a globose or ovoid
berry, containing 2— 10(— 20) pyrenes. Seeds with copious
endosperm.
Found throughout the tropical, subtropical or temperate
regions of the world. Ilex and Nemopanthus are recog-
nised in the family, which is often placed in the
Celastrales. Other genera such as Phelline, Sphenostemon
and Oncotheca are now placed in separate families by
several authors.
4614 ILEX
Ilex L., Species plantarum 1: 125 (1753); L.: 60
(1754); Sond.: 473 (1860); Benth. & Hook, f.: 356 ( 1867);
Harv.: 51 (1868); Oliv.: 359 (1868); Marloth: 150 (1925);
Loes.: 53 (1942); H. Perrier: 1 (1946); Keay: 623 (1958);
A. Robyns: 110 (1960); Mendes: 353 (1966); Verde.: 1
(1968); Mendes: 1 (1973); R.A. Dyer: 331 (1975); Trou-
pin; 321 (1983); Verde.: 329 ( 1989). Type species: I. aqui-
folium L.
Description as for family but petals fused at the base
with adnate stamens.
A genus of about 400 species of which only one is
indigenous to southern Africa.
The name Ilex is derived from its resemblance to the
leaves of Quercus ilex , the evergreen oak.
Ilex mitis (L.) Radik, in Reports of the British As-
sociation for the Advancement of Science 1885: 1081
(1886); Loes.: 246 (1895); Loes.: 240 (1901); Baker f.:
43 (1911); Loes.: 463 (1912); Engl.: 218 (1921); Exell:
74 (1927); Burtt Davy: 445 (1932); Lebrun: 134 (1935);
Loes.: 65 (1942); H. Perrier: 2 (1946); Robyns 1: 493
(1948); Brenan: 58 (1949); Adamson: 569 (1950); Exell
& Mendonga 1: 348 (1951); Brenan: 235 (1953); Keay:
623 (1958); F. White: 215 (1962); Von Breitenbach: 611
(1965); Mendes: 353 (1966); Verde.: 1 (1968); Palmer &
Pitman: 1269 (1972); Mendes: 1, 2 (1973); Compton: 333
(1976); Palgrave: 492 (1977); Troupin: 322 (1983);
Verde.: 329 (1989). Type: South Africa, specimen 261.2
Herb. Linnaeus [LINN, lecto.!; fide Verde.: 243 (1967)].
* The Herbarium, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9
3AB, England.
MS. received: August 1990.
var. mitis
Sideroxylon mite L. Systema naturae, edn 12,2: 178 (1767); Jacq.:
249 (1789); Willd.: 1089 (1798); Sims: t. 1858 (1816). Scleroxylum mite
(L.) Willd.: 249 (1809). Myrsine mitis (L.) Spreng.: 663 (1824); Pappe:
22 (1854).
Prinos lucidus Aiton: 478 (1789); Aiton: 313 (1811); Willd.: 226
(1799); Pers.: 388 (1805); DC.: 17 (1825); Roem. & Schult.: 61 (1829).
Type: not traced in BM.
Chrysophyllum millerianum Lam.: 45 (1797); Poir.: 447 (1810); Poir.:
17 (1812). Manglilla milleriana (Lam.) Pers.: 237 (1805); Roem. &
Schult.: 504 (1819). Type: South Africa, Cape of Good Hope, Mill. Fig.
pi. Gardeners' Dictionary 2: 199, t. 299 (1760).
Leucoxylon laurinum E. Mey. in Drege: 77, 79, 199 (1843), nom. nud.
Ilex capensis Sond.: 473 (1860); Pappe: 12 (1862); Oliv.: 359
(1868); Hiem: 143 (1896); Sim: 151 (1907); Eyles: 403 (1916). Types:
South Africa, Magaliesberg, Zeyher 1129 (K, SAM, isosyn.!); Uiten-
hage, Zeyher 3365 (SAM, isosyn.!); Zeyher 3366 (K, SAM, isosyn.!);
Winterhoeksberg and Nieuwekloof, Drege (K. isosyn.!) and many other
sheets and plates.
Rex mitis (L-) Radik, forma capensis (Sond.) Loes.: 242 (1901).
Celastrus sieberi Bemh. in Hb. Krauss., nom nud.
Densely crowned tree or shrub to 16 m tall, occasional-
ly to 33 m, evergreen; trunk up to 1 m in diameter, rarely
to 5.5 m. Bark smooth when young, whitish or grey, later
becoming pustulate and somewhat chunky or fissured,
(older Cape trees often have a pinkish red bark). Young
branchlets often puberulous, purplish. Leaves alternate,
glabrous, elliptic to elliptic-lanceolate, oblong-elliptic or
obovate-elliptic, 2.4-9. 5(-l 1.0) x 0.9— 2.5(— 3.5) mm,
acute, apiculate or rounded at apex, rarely acuminate
(often kinked when dried), obtuse or cunate at base, dark
green, often dull above, paler below; midrib pale, sunken;
entire or sometimes spiny near apex or in upper half of
leaf only, (young foliage olive or reddish green, spiny),
petiole 0.7-2.0 mm long, glabrous, channelled, usually
reddish purple; stipules semi-persistent. Inflorescence 1-
few-flowered cymes, pubescent. Calyx pubescent, lobes 5
or 6, 0.5-1 .0 mm long, ciliate. Petals white, glabrous, 2.3-
3.0 x 1. 5-2.0 mm, lobes 5 or 6, ciliate, fragrant. Stamens
5 or 6, 1.5-2. 5 mm long, staminodes shorter. Ovary
globose, 1.6 x 1.3 mm, stigma sessile, discoid, prominent;
rudimentary ovary conical. Fruit 4—6 mm in diam., glo-
bose, slowly ripening from greenish pink to dark crimson;
pyrenes 5 or 6, 3. 0-3. 5 x 1.0- 1.5 mm.
Widespread in Africa south of the Sahara, down to the
Cape. Does not occur in Namibia, Botswana and in the
drier parts of the Transvaal, Orange Free State and the
Cape. Most frequently growing beside rivers and streams,
in moist evergreen forests or low montane grassveld.
Flowering from September to February and fruiting from
December to June. Usually found between 7-600 m near
the coast and 1 000-2 1 30 m further inland. Ranges from
common to rare depending on locality. Figure 1.
Vouchers: Compton 32099 (PRE); Hemm 29 (PRE); Scheepers 772
(K, PRE): Strey 9880 (K. PRE); Williams 593 (K, PRE).
Has been used as an enema for colic in children
(southern Sotho); as a purgative (Kgatla); a lather is used
164
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
for washing the bodies of influenza sufferers (Zulu) and
in witchcraft (Sotho). The wood is used for furniture and
ceilings, brake blocks, railway sleepers and for firewoord.
Common names: Litota, liBota (Swati); Munamiti
(Bakone Suto); Mutanzwa-Khamelo (Venda); Phukhu,
Motoo a phofu, Mofusata (S Sotho); iPhuphuma (Zulu);
monamane (N Sotho); unDuma (Xhosa, Zulu); phukgu,
phugile (S Sotho); waterboom, waterhout, without, wit-
waterhout (Afrikaans); Cape holly, wild holly, water tree,
African holly (English).
Cultivated in Europe as a glasshouse or stove plant before
1816.
Var. schliebenii Loes. is only known from the Moro-
goro District, Tanzania and differs from var. mitis in its
smaller, almost round leaves.
FIGURE 1. — Ilex mitis var. mitis. A-F,
male : A, flowering branch, x 1 ; B,
bud, x 4; C, flower, x 4; D, calyx,
opened out, x 4; E, corolla, opened
out to show stamens, x 4; F,
rudimentary ovary, x 4. G-J,
female: G, flower, x 4; H, corolla,
opened out to show staminodes, x
4; I, ovary and calyx, x 4; J, detail
from fruiting branch, x 1. A-F,
Jessel 61\ G-I, Battiscombe 643\
J.A.S. Thomas 2650 (Reproduced
from the Flora of tropical East
Africa, with permission of the
Director of the Royal Botanic Gar-
dens, Kew. Artist Dorothy Thomp-
son.).
Introduced species
Voucher specimens have been seen for the following
species which are cultivated. Other taxa are mentioned in
Hollies — underused trees and shrubs for cultivation in
southern Africa (S. Andrews in prep.).
Ilex aquifolium L. Common or English holly. Na-
tive of S & W Europe, North Africa and W Asia. Shrub,
evergreen. Bark grey. Leaves elliptic or ovate, dark glossy
green, undulate, entire or when spinose, divaricating.
Flowers white, rarely tinged pink. Fruits spherical, red.
In parks and gardens.
Vouchers: S. Andrews 956 (PRE); L.E. Codd 10449 (PRE); F. Venter
12107 (PRE).
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
165
Ilex cornuta Lindl. & Paxton. Homed holly. Native
of China and Korea. Shrub, evergreen, dense rounded
habit. Leaves rectangular, dull green, spines variable, from
5-9 on older plants. Flowers white. Fruits spherical, red.
In parks and gardens.
Voucher: S. Andrews 985.
I. cornuta ‘Burfordii’. Leaves with terminal spine
only. Female. In gardens.
Vouchers: S. Andrews 986 (PRE); L.D. du Toil 130 (PRE).
Hex x koehneana Loes. (I. aquifolium L. x /.
latifolia Thunb.). Evergreen tree or shrub. Leaves oblong
to elliptic, large, glossy mid-green, strongly spined.
Flowers white. Fruits globose, bright red. In gardens.
Voucher: S. Andrews 914 (K, PRE).
Dex paraguariensis A. St.-Hil. Mate, Yerba Mata,
Paraguay tea. Native of Paraguay, Brazil, Uruguay, Ar-
gentina. Evergreen tree to 12 m. Bark grey. Leaves oblong
to obovate-oblong, obtuse, serrate, dull mid-green.
Flowers greenish white. Fruits globose, glossy dark red.
Planted at Westfalia Estate, Duiwelskloof, probably for
economic beverage which is made from the dried leaves.
Voucher: J.J. Bos 1093 (K. PRE).
Dex pernyi Franch. Native of Central and W China.
Shrub, evergreen. Leaves nearly sessile, triangular. 5-
spined, squared at base, dark glossy green. Flowers yel-
lowish. Fruit spherical, red. Seen in gardens.
Voucher: 5. Andrews 983 (PRE).
Ilex vomitoria Aiton (/. cassine Walter non L.)
Yaupon. Native of SE United States and Mexico. Tree or
shrub to 7 m. evergreen. Leaves ovate or elliptic, obtuse,
crenate, dark glossy green. Flowers white. Fruit globose,
scarlet. Planted in Grahamstown Botanic Garden. Foliage
contains a caffeine used by the North American Indians.
Voucher: 5. Andrews 1162 (K. PRE).
REFERENCES
ADAMSON. R.S. 1950. Aquifoliaceae. In R.S. Adamson & T.M. Salter,
Flora of the Cape Peninsula. Juta, Cape Town.
AITON, W. 1789. Hortus kewensis, edn 1. George Nicol, London.
AITON, W. 1811. Hortus kewensis, edn 2. Vol. 2. Longman, London.
BAKER. E.G. 1911. Contribution to our knowledge of the flora of
Gazaland. Journal of the Linnean Society. Botany 40: 1-245.
BENTHAM, G. & HOOKER, J.D. 1867. Genera plantarum 1: 356.
Lovell Reeve, London.
BRENAN, J.P.M. 1949. Check lists of the forest trees and shrubs of the
British Empire 5.2, Tanganyika Territory. Imperial Forestry In-
stitute, Oxford.
BRENAN, J.P.M. 1953. Plants collected by the Vemay Nyasaland ex-
pedition of 1946. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 8:
191-256.
BURTT DAVY, J. 1932. A manual of the flowering plants and ferns of
Transvaal and Swaziland , Vol. 2. Longmans Green, London.
COMPTON. R.H. 1976. The Flora of Swaziland. Journal of South
African Botany , Supplementary Volume 1 1 .
DE CANDOLLE, A.P 1825. Prodromus systematis naturalis regni
vegetabilis. Treuttel & Wiirtz, Paris.
DREGE, J.F. 1843. Zwei pflanzengeographische Documente. Flora,
Regensburg.
DYER, R.A. 1975. Genera of South African flowering plants, Vol. 1.
Government Printer, Pretoria.
ENGLER, H.G.A. 1921. Aquifoliaceae. Die Pflanzenwelt Afrikas 3,2:
218-220. Engelmann, Leipzig.
EXELL, A.W. 1927. Mr John Gossweiler’s Portuguese West African
plants. Journal of Botany, London 65: Suppl. Polypet. 74.
EXELL, A.W. & MENDON^A, F.A. 1951. Aquifoliaceae. Conspectus
florae angolensis 1 : 348. Junta de Investigafoes Coloniais, Lis-
bon.
EYLES, F. 1916. A record of plants collected in Southern Rhodesia.
Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 5: 273-564.
HARVEY, W.H. 1 868. Genera of South African plants, edn 2. Longman,
Green, Reader & Dyer, London.
HIERN, W.P. 1896. Catalogue of the African plants collected by Dr
Friedrich Welwitsch 1: 143, 144. British Museum (Natural His-
tory), London.
JACQUIN, N.J. 1789. Collectanea. Wappler, Vienna.
KEAY, R.W.J. 1958. Aquifoliaceae. Flora of West tropical Africa, edn 2,
1,2: 623. Crown Agents, London.
LAMARCK, J.B.A.P.M. 1797. Tableau encyclopedique et methodique,
Botanique. Pancoucke, Paris.
LEBRUN, J. 1935. Les Essences forestieres du Congo Beige 2: les
essences forestieres dies regions montagneuses du Congo orien-
tale. INEAC, Bruxelles.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum. Salvius, Stockholm.
LINNAEUS, C. 1754. Genera plantarum, 5th edn: 60. Salvius, Stock-
holm.
LINNAEUS, C. 1767. Systema naturae, edn 12,2: 178. Salvius, Stock-
holm.
LOESENER. L.E.T. 1895. Aquifoliaceae. In H.G.A. Engler. Pflanzenwelt
Ost-Afrikas C: 245, 246. Reimer, Berlin.
LOESENER. L.E.T. 1901. Monographia Aquifoliacearum, pars 1. Vova
acta academiae caesareae Leopoldino-Carolinae 78: 8-500.
LOESENER, L.E.T. 1912. Botanik: Aquifoliaceae. Wissenschaftliche Er-
gebnisse der deutschen Zentral-Afrika Expedition 1907-1908. 2:
463,464.
LOESENER. L.E.T. 1942. Aquifoliaceae. Die Natiirlichen Pflanzen-
familien, edn 2, 20b: 36-86. Engelmann, Leipzig.
MARLOTH. H.W.R. 1925. Flora of South Africa. Darter, Cape Town.
MENDES, E.J. 1966. Aquifoliaceae. Flora zambesiaca 2: 353-355.
Crown Agents, London.
MENDES, E.J. 1973. Aquifoliaceae. Flora de Mozambique 47: 1, 2.
Junta de Investigates do Ultramar, Lisbon.
MILLER, P. 1760. Gardeners' Dictionary. London.
OLIVER. D. 1868. Ilex. Flora of tropical Africa 1: 359. Lovell Reeve,
London.
PALGRAVE, K.C. 1977. Trees of southern Africa. Struik, Cape Town.
PALMER, E. & PITMAN, N. 1972. Trees of southern Africa. Balkema,
Cape Town.
PAPPE, C.W.L. 1854. Silva capensis. Van de Sandt de Villiers, Cape
Town.
PAPPE, C.W.L. 1 862. Silva capensis, edn 2. Index.
PERRIER DE LA BATHIE, J.M.H.A. 1946. Aquifoliacees. Flore de
Madagascar et des Comores 115: 1—5.
PERSOON. C.H. 1805. Synopsis plantarum. Cramer, Paris.
POIRET, J.L.M. 1810. Encyclopedic methodique , Suppl. Agasse, Paris.
POIRET. J.L.M. 1812. Encyclopedic methodique 2,2. Agasse, Paris.
RADLKOFER, L.A.T. 1886. In Reports of the British Association for the
Advancement of Science 1885: 1081.
ROBYNS, A. 1960. Aquifoliaceae. Flore du Congo Beige 9: 109-112.
INEAC, Brussels.
ROBYNS, W. 1948. Flore des spennatoplvytes du Parc National Albert.
Tome 1 — Gymnospermes et Choripetales. Institut des Parcs
Nationaux du Congo Beige, Brussels.
ROEMER. J.J. & SCHULTES. J.A. 1819. Systema vegetabilium 4. Cotta,
Stuttgardt.
ROEMER, J.J. & SCHULTES, J.A. 1829. Systema vegetabilium 7.1.
Cotta. Stuttgardt.
SIM. T.R. 1907. The forests and forest flora of the Colony of the Cape of
Good Hope. Taylor & Henderson, Aberdeen.
SIMS, J. 1816. Sideroxylon mite. Curtis ’ Botanical Magazine 43: t. 1858.
SONDER, O. 1860. Ilex in W.H. Harvey & O. Sonder. Flora capensis 1:
472M74. Hodges Smith. Dublin.
SPRENGEL, K. 1824. Systema vegetabilium, edn 16. Dietrichiana,
Gottingen.
TROUPIN, G. 1983. Flore du Rwanda — Spenmtophytes 2: 321-323.
Musee Royale de l’Afrique Centrale, Tervuren.
VERDCOURT, B. 1967. Tropical African plants 28: Aquifoliaceae. The
typification of Ilex mitis (L.) Radik. Kew Bulletin 21 : 243.
166
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
VERDCOURT, B. 1968. Aquifoliaceae. Flora of tropical East Africa.
Crown Agents, London.
VERDCOURT, B. 1989. Aquifoliaceae. Flora of Ethiopia 3: 329, 330.
National Herbarium, Addis Ababa.
VON BREITENBACH, F. 1963. Indigenous trees of southern Africa.
Government Printer, Pretoria.
WHITE, F. 1962. Forest flora of Northern Rhodesia. Oxford University
Press, London.
WILLDENOW, C.L. 1798. Species plantarum 1,2. Nauk, Berlin.
WILEDENOW, C.L. 1799. Spiecies plantarum 2. Nauk, Berlin.
WILLDENOW, C.L. 1809. Enumeratio plantarum horti regii botanici
Berolinensis. Libraria Scholae regalis, Berlin.
Bothalia 24,2 167-170(1994)
Notes on African plants
VARIOUS AUTHORS
PROTEACEAE
A NEW SPECIES OF LEUCOSPERMUM FROM THE SOUTHWESTERN CAPE
Since the last revision of Leucospermurn R. Br. was
published (Rourke 1972), undescribed taxa in this
prominent genus continue to be found (Rourke 1979;
1983). The singular species here described as Leucosper-
mum harpagonatum Rourke was discovered during
August 1993 at the northeastern end of the Rivier-
sonderend Mountains by Dr A.E. Rebelo of the Protea
Atlas Project.
Leucospermurn harpagonatum Rourke , sp. nov.
distinctissima, habitu prostrato conferto; foliis glabris
secundis integris; inflorescentia 8-10 floribus; 25-35 brac-
teis involucralibus; perianthio curto, tubo inflato distaliter
dense lanato; stylo distaliter retrorse hamato adaxialiter
valde arcuato, distinguitur.
TYPE. — Cape Province 3419 (Caledon): Groot Toren,
north slopes of Riviersonderend Mountains above
Olifantsdoom Farm on west side of a koppie NW of
Aasvoelkrans, (-BB), 20-10-1993, J.P. Rourke 2030
(NBG holo.!; B, BOL, E, K, MO, NSW, PRE, S, STE,
iso.!).
Prostrate sprawling shrublet forming dense mats 1-3
m in diam., 100-150 mm tall, with trailing branches
radiating horizontally along ground, arising from a single
main stem. Flowering branches usually produced at
perimeter of mat, 3-5 mm in diam.. puberulous initially,
soon glabrous, reddish flushed, bearing numerous pedun-
culate axillary inflorescences. Leaves secund, linear to nar-
rowly oblong, 55-110 x 2-10 mm, tapering in petiolar
region; apex entire, obtuse to rounded with a single amber
callosity; lamina broadly concave on upper surface, mar-
gins slightly incurved. Inflorescence 8— 10( 12)-flowered.
turbinate, 28-30 mm in diam.; pedunculate, peduncle 10-
20 mm long. Involucre prominent, 3-seriate; composed of
25-35 ovate to broadly ovate, densely sericeous, car-
tilaginous involucral bracts, 6-8 x 2-A mm; imbricate but
apices patent, acuminate. Receptacle obconic-flattened, 3-
5 mm diam. Floral bracts tightly clasping perianth, broad-
ly ovate, acute, 5 x 6-7 mm, very densely sericeous.
Perianth cream to pale carmine, very strongly adaxially
curved, utriculose, 1 0—15 mm long; tube prominently in-
flated, 9-10 x 5-6 mm distally, narrowed and glabrous
proximally, densely lanate distally; claws 4—5 mm long,
abruptly narrowed above tube, strongly deflexed on open-
ing, densely lanate, especially along margins, carmine in
live state; limbs lanceolate-acute, 3 mm long, recurved on
opening, densely villous. Anthers 4, sessile, 1 mm long.
Style 20-25 mm long, strongly adaxially cygneous, taper-
ing terminally, upper half retrorsely barbed, cream or red-
dish in live state, tapering to a narrow neck below pollen
presenter. Pollen presenter inwardly curved, conic-acute
1.5 mm long with a distinct proximal corona. Stigmatic
groove terminal. Ovary not differentiated from style,
minutely sericeous, 0.5 mm long. Hypogynous scales
linear-acute 2 mm long, yellow. Fruit a minutely
puberulous, cylindric, greyish-white achene, 8x5 mm,
broadly emarginate at apex. Figures 1 & 2.
Diagnostic characters
This species is clearly related to L. hamatum Rourke
on account of its few-flowered inflorescences, adaxially
curved styles beset with minutely retrorse barbs and in-
flated perianth tubes. It is distinguished from L. hamatum
by having linear to narrowly linear, entire leaves (usually
tridentate in L. hamatum) and by the utriculose perianth
tube, densely lanate in the upper half (glabrous in L.
hamatum). Another marked difference is that L. har-
pagonatum has a well-developed involucre of 25-35
bracts, whereas in L. hamatum the involucre consists of
3 or 4 bracts or is completely absent and is replaced by
a false involucre formed from 4 or 5 floral bracts. On
average there are more flowers in each inflorescence in
L. harpagonatum (8-10 flowers) and fewer (4—7 flowers)
in L. hamatum.
Relationships
Leucospermurn hamatum and L. harpagonatum are
clearly a pair of geographical vicariads, their distribution
areas separated by approximately 200 km. They share the
remarkable character of having styles beset with minutely
retrorse barbs. Their perianths are also similar in form,
having very reduced shortened claws and a large tube
prominently inflated distally to form a bladder-like nectar
reservoir. In this character they appear to be allied to
Leucospermurn section Tumiditubus and may even have
been derived from that section as a specialised offshoot.
However, the two species should be placed within a
distinct section of their own. With its well-developed in-
volucre and greater number of flowers in each inflores-
cence, L. harpagonatum represents a very much less
reduced stage than L. hamatum.
Distribution , habitat and biology
Present information suggests that L. harpagonatum is
endemic to a few hectares at the northeastern end of the
Riviersonderend Range near McGregor in the south-
western Cape. A single population of approximately 60
plants has been located on the farm Groot Toren above
Olifantsdoom homestead at an elevation of approximately
168
Bothalia 24,2 ( 1994)
FIGURE 1. — Leucospermum harpagonatum Rourke. A, flowering shoot:, B, lengthwise section through inflorescence; C, perianth in bud; D,
involucral bract; E, perianth at anthesis showing inflated tube region; F, floral bract; G, perianth limb and anther; H, gynoecium showing
retroresly barbed style, pollen presenter, ovary and hypogynous scales; I, mature achene. From the type material Rourke 2030.
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
169
FIGURE 2. — -Leucospermum harpa-
gonatum Rourke. A, flowering
branch; B, close-up view of
inflorescences about to open
(left) and fully open (right).
Rourke 2030. Photo by J.
Loedolff.
790 m, growing in a dry variant of Mesic Mountain Fyn-
bos (Figure 3).
Mature adult plants form dense mats 0.5-3. 0 m in
diameter which resemble Carpobrotus edulis when
viewed from a distance. Flowering takes place on short
shoots as well as on the long trailing branches produced
at the perimeter of the mats. These trailing branches are
particularly floriferous producing up to twenty-five axil-
lary inflorescences along their length. The flowers are
cream at first, changing to pink and carmine in the post-
pollination phase. They produce no perceptible odour and
open between late August and the end of November. Both
styles and perianths are chewed by rodents which gnaw
open the bladder-like perianth tube apparently to gain ac-
cess to the large volume of nectar which is produced in
each swollen perianth.
The specific epithet is derived from harpago — a grap-
pling iron and the suffix -atum indicating likeness or pos-
session. alluding to the distinctive form of the styles.
170
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
Specimens examined
WESTERN CAPE. — 3419 (Caledon): above Olifantsdoorn, Rivier-
sonderend Range, (-BB), Aug. A.G. Rebelo s.n. Protea Atlas 9308121
(NBG); Groot Toren, north slopes of Riviersonderend Mountains above
Olifantsdoorn Farm on west side of a koppie NW of Aasvoelkrans, (-BB),
Oct., Rourke 2030 (B. BOL, E, K, MO, NBG. NSW, PRE, S, STE).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am most grateful to Dr Tony Rebelo for drawing my
attention to this species, to Ellaphie Ward-Hilhorst who
prepared the line drawing and to Jeanette Loedolff for the
photographs.
REFERENCES
ROURKE, J.P. 1972. Taxonomic studies on Leucospennum R. Br. Jour-
nal of South African Botany , supplementary vol. No. 8.
ROURKE, J.P. 1979. Leucospennum winteri. The Flowering Plants of
Africa : t. 1781.
ROURKE, J.P. 1983. A remarkable new Leucospennum from the
southern Cape. Journal of South African Botany 49: 213-219.
J.P. ROURKE*
* Compton Herbarium, National Botanical Institute, Kirstenbosch, Private
Bag X7, Claremont 7735, Cape Town.
BORAGINACEAE
LOBOSTEMON REGULAREFLORUS — THE CORRECT NAME FOR L. GRAND1FLORUS
Levyns (1934) published Lobostemon grandiflorus
(Andrews) Levyns as a new combination. The basionym
is cited as Echium grandiflorum Andrews (1797). Salis-
bury (1796), however, described E. grandiflorum Salisb.
a year earlier. According to Article 64.1 of the ICBN
(Greuter et al. 1988) a combination based on a later
homonym is illegitimate.
However, Art. 72, Note 1 of the ICBN (Greuter et al.
1988) permits an author to use an illegitimate epithet
providing it is used in a ‘new position or sense’. This
means that Lobostemon grandiflorus Levyns is treated as
new having priority from 1934. Nonetheless, an older
specific epithet than Levyns’s grandiflorus exists and the
present combination is therefore rejected in favour of the
one given below.
Ker Gawler (1801) published the trinomial Echium
regulare florum, which cannot be regarded as a phrase in
the ablative. Therefore, in accordance with Art. 23.1 of
the ICBN (Greuter et al. 1988), the aforementioned epithet
is not to be rejected and must be united as below. Regard-
ing the epithet regulare, it is clearly an adverb and is
therefore not subject to the provisions of Recommendation
73G in respect to changing the ‘e’ to ‘i\
The illustration by Andrews (1797: t. 20) is chosen as
the lectotype because Ker Gawler (1801) refers solely to it.
Lobostemon regulareflorus (Ker Gawl.) Buys,
comb. nov.
Echium regulare florum Ker Gawk: 147 (1801). E. grandiflorum
Andrews: t. 20 (1797); Vent.: t. 98 (1805); Desf.: 177 (1809); Edwards:
t. 124 (1816); Aiton: 299 (1810); Mord. Laun. & Loisel.: t. 195 (1819);
Roem. & Schult.: 1 1 & 714 (1819); Link: 170 (1821); Drapiez: t. 235
(1830), non E. grandiflorum Salisb.: 1 15 (1796). E. formosum Pers.: 163
(1805); Lehm.: 418 (1818): DC.: 15 (1846); C.H. Wright: 44(1904). E.
lubiferum Poir.: 663 ( 1808). Type: Andrews: The Botanist’s Repository:
t. 20 (1797), (lecto., here designated).
Lobostemon formosus (Pers.) H. Buek: 132 ( 1837).
L. grandiflorus (Andrews) Levyns: 443 (1934).
REFERENCES
AITON, W. 1810. Hortus kewensis, edn 2,1: 299. Longman, London.
ANDREWS, H.C. 1797. The Botanist's Repository, t. 20. Bensely, Lon-
don.
BUEK, H.W. 1 837. Echia capensia. Linnaea 11: 132.
DE CANDOLLE, A.P. 1846. Prodromus systematis naturalis regni
vegetabilis 10: 15. Treuttel & Wiirtz, London.
DESFONTA1NES, R.L. 1809. Histoire des arbres et arbrisseaux qui
peuvent etre cultives en pleine terre sur le sol de la France 1 : 177.
Brosson, Paris.
DRAPIEZ, P.A.J. 1830. Herbier del’ amateur de fleurs, contenant, graves
et colorie’s, d’apres nature 4: t. 235. De Mat, Bruxelles.
DUMONT DE COURSET, G.L.M. 1814. Le Botaniste cultivateur, ou
description, culture et usages de la plus grande partie des plantes
etrangeres 2,7: 147. Deterville Goujon, Paris.
EDWARDS, S. 1816. The Botanical Register 2: t. 124. Ridgeway, Lon-
don.
GREUTER, W„ BURDET, H.M., CHALONER, W.G., DEMOULIN, V.,
GROLLE, R„ HAWKSWORTH, D.L., NICOLSON, D.H.,
SILVA, PC., STAFLEU, F.A., VOSS, E.G. & McNEILL, J. 1988.
International code of botanical nomenclature adopted by the
Fourteenth International Botanical Congress, Berlin, July-August
1987. Regnum vegetabile 1 18.
KER GAWLER, J.B. 1801. Recensio plantarum hue usque in repositorio
botanicarum depictamm : 11. White, London.
LEHMANN, J.G.C. 1818. Plantae e familiae Asperifoliantm nuciferae:
418. Dummler, Berlin.
LEVYNS, M.R. 1934. A revision of Lobostemon. Journal of the Linnean
Society 49: 393-451.
LINK, J.H.F. 1821. Enumeratio plantarum horti regii botanici berolinen-
sis altera 1: 170. Reimer, Berolini.
MORDANT DE LAUNAY, J.C.M. & LOISELEUR-DESLONG-
CHAMPS, J.L.A. 1819. Herbier general de Vamateur 3: t. 195.
Audot. Paris.
PERSOON, C.H. 1805. Synopsis plantarum, sen Enchiridium botanicum
complectens enumerationem systematicam specierum hucusque
cognitarum 1: 163. Cramerum, Paris.
POIRET, J.L.M. 1 808. Encyclopedic methodique . Botanique 8: 663. Chez
H. Agasse, Paris.
ROEMER. J.J. & SCHULTES. J.A. 1819. Systema vegetabilium 4: 1 1 &
714. Cottae, Stuttgardt.
SALISBURY, R.A. 1796. Prodromus stirpium in horto ad Chapel Aller-
ton vigentium: 115. London.
VENTENAT, E.P. 1805. Jardin de la Malmaison 2: t. 98. De Pimprimerie
de Crapelet.
WRIGHT, C.H. 1904. Flora capensis 4,2: 44. Lovell Reeve, London.
M.H. BUYS* and J.J.A. VAN DER WALT*
* Department of Botany, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X5018,
Stellenbosch 7599.
MS. received: 1994-01-25.
Bothalia 24,2: 171-185 (1994)
An overview of Aspergillus (Hyphomycetes) and associated teleomorphs in
southern Africa
A. LOUISE SCHUTTE*
Keywords: Aspergillus , Emericella, Eurotium, fungi, Hyphomycetes, mycotoxins, overview, pathology, southern Africa, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
An overview is given of literature concerning the genus Aspergillus Link and its teleomorphs, Chaetosartorya Subram,,
Emericella Berk. & Broome, Eurotium Link, Fennellia B.J. Wiley & E.G. Simmons, Neosartorya Malloch & Cain and
Sclerocleista Subram. encountered in the Republic of South Africa, Botswana, Lesotho, Mozambique, Namibia, Swaziland,
Transkei and Zimbabwe up to 1993. The information is grouped under headings that indicate the field of research, namely
general mycology, plant pathology, human pathology, animal and insect pathology, industrial relevance and secondary metabo-
lites and mycotoxins. An alphabetical list of recorded Aspergillus species is provided and the relevant host or substrate is given
together with a literature reference, while the fungal nomenclature has been updated. All the Aspergillus species that are
regarded as common have been reported from southern Africa. No in-depth research has been done here on this group, except
for chemical work on mycotoxins.
U1TTREKSEL
’n Oorsig van literatuur aangaande die genus Aspergillus Link en sy teleomorwe, Chaetosartorya Subram., Emericella Berk.
& Broome, Eurotium Link, Fennellia B.J. Wiley & E.G. Simmons, Neosartorya Malloch & Cain en Sclerocleista Subram.,
aangetref in die Republiek van Suid-Afrika, Botswana, Lesotho, Mosambiek, Namibie, Swaziland, Transkei en Zimbabwe tot
1993 word gegee. Die informasie word gegroepeer onder opskrifte wat die aard van die navorsing aandui naamlik mikologie,
plantpatologie, menslike patologie, dierlike- en insekpatologie, industriele toepassings en sekondere metaboliete en mikotok-
siene. ’n Alfabetiese lys van aangetekend e. Aspergillus spesies word verskaf en die relevante gasheer of substraat word saam met
'n verwysing gegee terwyl die swamnomenklatuur op datum gebring is. Die algemene Aspergillus spesies in suidelike Afrika is
almal aangeteken. Geen diepgaande navorsing is hier op hierdie groep gedoen nie, behalwe die chemiese werk op mikotoksiene.
INTRODUCTION
‘Species of the great group Aspergillus form a very
considerable percentage of all the mould colonies en-
countered in the cultural examination of foodstuffs, of soil
and of miscellaneous materials’ (Thom & Church 1926).
Economically and ecologically Aspergillus is a very
important group, not only because of its ubiquitous nature,
but it also has the ability to grow under a wide range of
conditions (Domsch et al. 1980). There are probably few
substrates that cannot be colonized and degraded. These
fungi also synthesize an extraordinary variety of metabo-
lites with biological activity (Raper & Fennell 1973).
Profitable and advantageous applications of Aspergillus
can be found in the production of antibiotics, antifungal
substances, vitamins and organic acids, in the preparation
of oriental foods, the use of various species in physiologi-
cal experiments and testing of fungicides as well as in
genetic work (Kozakiewicz 1989). Aspergilli also have a
deleterious impact: some members of the genus are plant
pathogens (Raper & Fennell 1973; Gorter 1977), there are
well-known human (Martin & Berson 1973) and animal
pathogens (Neitz 1965), many are mycotoxin producers
(Frisvad 1989) and they contribute greatly to spoilage
(Kozakiewicz 1989).
* Mycology Unit, Biosystematics Division, Plant Protection Research
Institute, Private Bag XI 34, Pretoria 0001, Republic of South Africa.
MS. received: 1993-10-15.
The genus name Aspergillus dates back to Micheli,
who used the term because of the similarity between the
conidial head and a holy water sprinkler called an aspergill
(Raper & Fennell 1973). The development of the
taxonomy of Aspergillus is described in detail by Raper
& Fennell (1973), Christensen & Tuthill (1985) and
Kozakiewicz (1989).
The first comprehensive work on the genus Aspergillus
was by Thom & Church (1926) and the second revision
of this work is the monograph currently used for Asper-
gillus identifications (Raper & Fennel 1973). These
authors recognised 132 species and separated them into
18 groups. In an update by Samson (1979), he accepted
another 34 taxa and nomenclaturally separated the asexual
from the sexual states.
A shortcoming of the work of Raper & Fennell (1973)
is the fact that both anamorph and teleomorph species are
treated under the anamorph genus, Aspergillus. The
nomenclatural separation of the anamorph from the
teleomorph, as incorporated by Benjamin (1955), was not
accepted by Raper & Fennell (1973). Benjamin (1955)
selected the previously published generic names, Eurotium
Link, Emericella Berk, and Sartorya Vuill. for the teleo-
morphic states. The typification of 190 taxa of Aspergillus
was investigated by Samson & Gams (1985) and adjust-
ments were made to meet the rules of the International
Code of Botanical Nomenclature, giving teleomorphic
names priority over anamorphic ones. The taxonomic
work of Horie (1980), Gams & Samson (1985) and
172
Bothalia 24,2 ( 1994)
Kozakiewicz (1989) further contributed to our knowledge
of the group.
Various authors have studied specific groups of the
genus: Al-Musallam (1980) did a revision of the black
Aspergilli, Christensen (1982) revised the A. ochraceus
group and Kurtzman et al. ( 1986) and Klich & Pitt ( 1988)
differentiated between species in the A. flavus group.
Horie ( 1980) and Kozakiewicz (1989) used ascospore and
conidial ornamentation as an aid to identification.
More sophisticated methods such as DNA relatedness
(Kurtzman et al. 1986), mycotoxin production (Klich &
Pitt 1988; Frisvad 1989), API-Zym strips (Jain & Lacey
1991) and genetic similarity studies (Peterson 1992) have
been used with success in Aspergillus identification. Sam-
son & Pitt (1985, 1990) described the use of nucleic acid
relatedness, serological methods, exocellular polysac-
charides, enzyme electrophoresis, ubiquinone systems and
DNA and RNA studies for the same purpose. Their find-
ings confirm the value of a multidisciplinary approach to
fungal taxonomy in general, including that of Aspergillus.
A major contribution to Aspergillus taxonomy has been
made by the workshops on Aspergillus and Penicillium
systematics (Samson & Pitt 1985, 1990) as well as the
formation of the Subcommission on Penicillium and
Aspergillus Systematics under the International Commis-
sion on Taxonomy of Fungi (Samson & Pitt 1990).
This paper is an overview of publications dealing with
all aspects of Aspergillus in South Africa, Botswana,
Lesotho, Mozambique, Namibia, Swaziland, Transkei and
Zimbabwe. Literature is grouped under headings indicat-
ing the scope of the research and is in chronological order.
A list of recorded species is appended in which isolates
in the dried collection (PREM) as well as the culture col-
lection (PPRI) of the National Collection of Fungi were
included. Culture collections donated to the Mycology
Unit as well as catalogues of international culture collec-
tions were consulted for additional information. No at-
tempt has been made to verify published data, the identity
of Aspergillus isolates or any other infonnation. Names
of fungi and hosts or substrates are given exactly as in
the original text.
OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE
General mycology
The first entry of an Aspergillus in the National Col-
lection of Fungi is A. glaucus Link (PREM 701 — see
checklist), collected by J.H.T. De Villiers from Nicoti'ana
tabacum in the Cape Colony, on 24 December 1909.
Eurotium herbariorum Link (PREM 833 — see checklist),
identified by R.N. Adlam and collected by Medley Wood
from Cephalanthus natalensis in Transvaal ( Wood 3920),
is the second entry. No author citation or date is given
but Medley Wood collected during the previous century
and died in 1915 (Doidge 1950). In all probability this
specimen represents the first record of an Aspergillus in
southern Africa.
Aspergillus isolates are often listed in general fungal
surveys. Cohen (1950) studied soil fungi and recorded
three Aspergillus species. Doidge (1950) listed 19 species
of Aspergillus. Many of these species names are no longer
in use. The mycological Herbarium of the Timber Re-
search Laboratory, connected to the Transvaal Chamber
of Mines, had a collection of over 1 400 timber-deteriorat-
ing fungi, mostly obtained underground. Many of these
isolates had been identified overseas by Thom and the
CBS (see checklist). Fortunately, Doidge (1950) listed
these fungi, including the Aspergilli. as the original infor-
mation and lists could not be traced.
Ascosporic Aspergillus spp. present in the collection
of the University of the Witwatersrand were discussed by
Swart ( 1 959). Five Aspergillus spp., four of which were
new records for South Africa, were isolated from forest
soil in Zululand (Eicker 1969). The majority of fungi iso-
lated from Zululand soil belonged to the Fungi Imperfecti,
with Aspergilli well represented (Eicker 1970a), and dis-
tributed evenly in vertical profiles of these soils (Eicker
1970b). In a paper dealing with the occurrence, isolation
and identity of thermophylic fungi, Eicker (1972) indi-
cated that A. fumigatus Fresen. can grow and sporulate at
temperatures ranging from 20°C to 50°C. A. japonicus
Saito was present in three of the four Eucalyptus leaf litter
horizons (Eicker 1973). From savanna soil of the
Transvaal 16 species of Aspergillus were isolated (Eicker
1974), and most of these were deposited in IMI (see
checklist). Few isolates of Aspergillus were found on litter
of Panicum coloration L. (Eicker 1976). In the western
Transvaal, seven species of Aspergillus were found in the
soil of an Acacia karroo community (Papendorf 1976).
Bezuidenhout (1977) found nine Aspergillus spp. among
Hyphomycetes associated with the grass, Cenchrus
ciliaris L. Hyaline amerospores, including those of Asper-
gillus, were found to make up 4.5% of the aerospora
above an Eragrostis curvula (Schrad.) Nees pasture (Van
der Merwe et al. 1979).
Gorier (1979) compiled a checklist of fungi recorded
in South Africa up to 1977: the original publications are
listed here. A. clavatus Desm. was found to be present in
45% of industrial malt samples, while A. flavus Link com-
prised about 25% of the fungi found on commercial malt
(Rabie & Eiibben 1984). Roux (1985) isolated five Asper-
gillus spp. from a Karoo pasture. A. carbonarius (Bainier)
Thom has been recorded on Eucalyptus (Lundquist &
Baxter 1985) and Aspergillus spp. were found on Pinus
(Lundquist 1987).
Aspergillus spp. were the dominant fungi isolated from
the bare patches on the Giribes plains in Namibia, making
up 21% of fungi isolated (Eicker et al. 1982), but no ex-
planation could be given for this phenomenon. Allsopp et
al. (1987) isolated fungi associated with roots of
proteaceous seedlings and recorded A. duricaulis Raper
& Fennell and A. unilateralis Thrower from South Africa
for the first time. A. ficuum (Reichardt) Hennings and A.
ustus (Bainier) Thom & Church were found to be en-
dophytes in grass (De Villiers 1989). Aspergillus spp. were
commonly isolated from indigenous stored seed (Isaacs
& Benic 1990). Watson et al. (1990) found among others,
A. terreus in the gut of dune dwelling lepismatids, but
neither the role nor the effect of these fungi could be
determined. Conidiogenesis of A. niger Tiegh. was studied
by Tiedt (1992).
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
173
Plant pathology and seed deterioration
Verwoerd (1929) indicated A. niger as the cause of
disease of onions and pomegranates in the winter rainfall
area. Rosselet (1953) used A. niger as test organism in
determining available potassium in lowveld soil, and later
(Rosselet 1955) to determine levels of potassium, mag-
nesium and phosphorus in citrus orchards as well as in
virgin soil. This method is based on the assumption that
elements available to micro-organisms will be available
to plants. These references possibly have more relevance
to plant nutrition than to plant pathology.
Doidge & Van der Plank (1936) indicated A. niger and
Aspergillus spp. as a cause of rot on stored citrus fruit. A.
carbonarius, A. niger and A. ochraceus group were listed
as plant pathogens by Doidge et al. (1953). A. niger was
found to comprise 6% of fungi in citrus orchard soil
whereas in virgin soils A. fumigatus was one of the
dominant species. The latter species was rarely isolated
from citrus soil (Martin 1960). Four species of Aspergillus
contributed to the decay of litchi fruit, according to Roth
(1963) whereas A. niger has been isolated from banana
hands (Roth & Loest 1965).
Van der Westhuizen & Bredell (1972) found several
Aspergillus species on high quality maize, A. flavus , A.
niger and A. sydowi (Bain. & Sart.) Thom & Church being
among the most prevalent ones. Stored lucerne seed was
found to yield only a few Aspergillus spp. and no increase
during storage was reported (Marasas & Bredell 1973).
An index of plant pathogens (Gorter 1977) listed A. flavus
and A. niger.
According to Bornman (1978) a large proportion of
seeds of Welwitschia mirabilis (Hook, f.) are sterile and
this situation is aggravated by A. niger. This fungus infests
the inflorescence, rendering more than 99% of all seeds
infertile. This same fungus has also been listed in con-
nection with post-harvest decay of mangoes (Wehner et
al. 1981). Aspergillus contamination of both stored seed
and seedlings of maize is high: members of the A. glaucus
group are often isolated and it is suggested that some
Aspergillus spp. may be seed-transmitted (McLean & Ber-
jak 1987).
Various Aspergillus species were isolated from the
roots of Medicago spp., but they were not pathogenic
(Lamprecht et al. 1988). Steinke et al. (1990) found that
Aspergillus spp. deteriorated both Avicennia and Bru-
guiera leaves but they made up less than 12% of isola-
tions. This group of fungi occurred in less than 10% of
sorghum grain (Bosman et al. 1991). A. niger commonly
occurred in citrus soil but did not have a pronounced an-
tagonistic effect on various fungal pathogens of citrus
(Botha & Wehner 1990). Four Aspergillus spp. were
recorded to be antagonistic to Rhizoctonia solani by
Weideman et al. (1990).
Aspergillus spp. did not pose problems on stored
homoiohydrous seeds (Mycock & Berjak 1990). Mycock
et al. (1990) found that A. flavus var. columnaris Raper
& Fennell can infect maize seedlings and survive in the
maturing plant, and Mycock & Beijak (1992) found that
hot water treatment of maize seed decreased internal
Aspergillus counts from 61% to 5%. Healthy chicory roots
were inoculated with Aspergillus spp. isolated from in-
fected roots, but the fungi had no detrimental effect
(Prinsloo et al. 1991).
Human pathology
Species of Aspergillus are indicated as pathogens
worldwide in various aspects in the pathology of humans
and of other mammals and insects. In the case of humans
information is grouped below according to the effect of
the fungus. Thiel (1986) as well as Marasas (1988) con-
sidered foodbome mycotoxins such as aflatoxin, produced
by A. flavus to be of great medical relevance.
Aspergilli as allergens
Members of this genus have allergenic qualities and
the first southern African report in this regard is a survey
done by Ordman & Etter (1956). They found that Asper-
gillus spp. made up only 0.7% of airborne fungi in Johan-
nesburg and showed no seasonal incidence. A later survey
(Ordman 1963) indicated the same tendencies, with
similar results obtained for Windhoek (Ordman 1970).
Patients with positive precipitins to Aspergillus had these
to either A. fumigatus or A. niger ; the antigens were
prepared locally (Benatar et al. 1980). Patients of certain
population groups were found to be more allergic to A.
fumigatus than others (Joubert et al. 1988). Ten per cent
of allergic children in the Western Cape were sensitive to
Aspergillus spp. when positive skin tests were done,
whereas 12% tested positive to this fungus when IgE
responses were used (Potter et al. 1991)
Aspergilli and cancer
In an appraisal of liver cirrhosis and hepatoma in the
local population, Isaacson (1966) came to the conclusion
that liver cell necrosis can be a result of A. flavus toxicosis
rather than of infective hepatitis. Purchase & Vorster
(1968) suggested that aflatoxin M found in milk also had
a carcinogenic effect.
Gilman (1972) conducted a comprehensive survey into
fungal contamination of food in the Eastern Transvaal and
Swaziland and the findings supported an association be-
tween mycotoxins in the diet and incidence of liver cancer.
Various Aspergillus spp. were recorded and aflatoxin was
found to be more prevalent in groundnut products than in
maize. Peers et al. (1976) found a significant correlation
between ingested aflatoxin and the incidence of primary
liver cancer in Swaziland. Aspergillus was present in 3.3%
of samples from the low rate area and 6.7% samples from
the high rate area of an oesophageal cancer area in
Transkei (Marasas et al. 1981). The correlation of high
risk of exposure to aflatoxin and the hepatitis B virus to
hepatocellular carcinoma has been indicated (Bressac et
al. 1991), but is beyond the scope of this overview. The
above-mentioned references are merely representative of
this subject; more were traced but they did not refer to a
specific fungus.
174
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
Aspergillosis, keratitis and otitis
Cases of infection by Aspergillus are often associated
with degenerative disorders. Jacobs et al. (1965) found
that pulmonary aspergillosis was extremely rare in all race
groups in South Africa and they described a single case.
Martin & Berson (1973) gave a comprehensive account
of fungal diseases in southern Africa, listing cases of
aspergilloses: various Aspergillus spp. were considered
responsible for 69 cases of diseases of the ear.
Two cases of aspergillosis of the skin were recorded
by Findlay et al. (1971) and in both cases the organism
involved was A. fumigatus, while Caro & Dogliotti (1973)
described a similar case. Block & Young (1977) indicated
the value of early diagnosis of opportunistic fungal infec-
tions and again referred to A. fumigatus. They also found
that the use of membrane filter blood cultures gave better
results than serological methods. This same fungus was
responsible for four cases of pneumonia described by Kal-
lenbach et al. (1977). Bak & Wagenveld ( 1983) discussed
the treatment of otitis where one of the organisms causing
problems was A. niger. A. fumigatus as well as an uniden-
tified Aspergillus sp. was found to cause fatal fungal
pneumonia in heart transplant patients (Cooper et al.
1983). A case report of paranasal sinus aspergillosis was
given by Glass et al. (1984) but no fungus was indicated.
Pulmonary aspergillosis caused by A. fumigatus compli-
cated pneumonia and was the cause of death of an other-
wise healthy patient (Lewis et al. 1985).
Aspergillus spp. were identified in four cases of fungal
keratitis that responded well to miconazole treatment
(Fitzsimons & Peters 1986). In the area where Mseleni
joint disease is found, 41% of homegrown groundnuts
were contaminated by Aspergillus (Marasas & Van
Rensburg 1986). A. stromatoides Raper & Fennell was
found to cause a fatal sino-orbital infection (Sacho et al.
1987), while A. niger was isolated from a patient with a
fatal brain abscess (Berkowitz et al. 1987). Govender et
al. (1991) reported five cases of A. fumigatus infection of
the spine and found that the patients responded well to
antifungal drugs.
Animal and insect pathology
Prinsloo (1960) found that A. parasiticus Speare in-
fected brown locusts both in the laboratory and in the
field. Neitz (1965) indicated A. fumigatus as an enzootic
pathogen in various birds, having obtained some of this
information by personal communication. Prozesky et al.
(1971) gave an account of A. fumigatus infection of scaly
weavers. An outbreak in a colony of these birds kept at
Onderstepoort is described: fortunately, the indicated treat-
ment quickly put an end to the morbidity and deaths. Nes-
bit (1986) described aspergillosis of a piglet but no
causative organism could be isolated.
Industrial relevance
The first record of Aspergilli mentioned in an industrial
sense was by Van der Bijl (1920) who studied deteriora-
tion of sugar by fungi. Isolates were sent to Thom in
America and his full report is included in Van der Bijl's
publication. The production of the enzyme invertase by
micro-organisms such as A. niger and A. terreus Thom
was influenced by various factors and these were indi-
cated. In the dairy industry Aspergillus spp. were reported
by Davel & Neethling ( 1930) to be troublesome. Purchase
& Vorster (1968) tested milk samples for the presence of
aflatoxin M, as this mycotoxin may be carcinogenic: 21
samples were tested and five gave positive results. A prob-
lem with sticky molasses meal was addressed Try Roth
(1968) who tested many micro-organisms, among others
seven species of Aspergillus, to render the product more
free-flowing.
When fungi found on cheese were tested for toxicity,
all isolates of A. ustus were found to be toxic to ducklings,
but no mycotoxins were detected in the cheese (Liick et
al. 1976). Likewise, no aflatoxin was detected in cheese
or milk powder but 23% of milk samples tested positive
(Liick & Wehner 1979).
Aspergillus spp. were found to be more prevalent on
grapes infected by Botrytis than on healthy ones (Le Roux
et at. 1973). Using three different techniques, Eicker
(1977) isolated thermophylic fungi, including A. fumi-
gatus, from mushroom compost. Fungal growth on wet-
blue leather is a common occurrence and Russell (1981)
tested various fungicides by using fungi including Asper-
gillus spp. isolated from this substrate.
Relative cellulytic activity of 14 species of Aspergillus
was also determined, when mesophilic fungi on compost
was studied (Eicker 1980). Various casing materials for
mushroom production were evaluated by Smit (1984) and
Aspergilli were encountered during microbiological
evaluation. Thermotolerant fungi, namely A. fumigatus
and an Aspergillus sp., were grown on spent sulphite liq-
uor from a pulp mill (Pretorius 1993a, b, c). The potential
for single cell protein production, the growth charac-
teristics of these fungi and three reactor configurations
were discussed.
Secondary metabolites and mycotoxins
Species of Aspergillus and Penicillium are potent
secondary metabolite and mycotoxin producers (Frisvad
1989). The use of secondary metabolite profiles in the
identification of these species is well established and these
substances are the subject of ongoing research (Samson
& Pitt 1985; Frisvad 1989; Samson & Pitt 1990).
In the early 1960's aflatoxin, a metabolite of A. flavus
and A. parasiticus, was discovered and soon found to be
highly carcinogenic (Raper & Fennell 1973). Previously
Thom & Church (1926) had already indicated that grain
contaminated with A. flavus could be poisonous to cattle
and swine. As a result of these findings, research in secon-
dary metabolites and mycotoxins became a high priority
world-wide. Rabie et al. (1964) indicated that A.
amstelodami (L. Mangin) Thom & Church had a toxic
effect on poultry and rabbits. The fungus proved to be
lethal to rabbits and reduced the growth of ducks. The
work done subsequently by Scott (1965) attracted inter-
national attention. He investigated the toxigenicity of
fungi obtained from various commercial products: 46 fun-
gal strains belonging to 22 species caused the death of
ducklings in only 14 days. Of these, 12 species belonged
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
175
to the genus Aspergillus. Five of these Aspergillus spp.
also had a detrimental effect on mice and rats.
Rabie et al. (1965) found that A. wentii Wehmer was
toxic to experimental animals, but the toxin was not iden-
tified. Rabie & Terblanche (1967) compared the influence
of temperature on two A. wentii isolates with variable
toxicity. The toxins were characterized and found to be
mildly toxic to ducklings (Rabie et al. 1986).
Van Warmelo (1967) investigated the correlation be-
tween the incidence of toxicity of stock feeds and certain
fungal species. Aflatoxin was found in only five of the
39 samples in which A. flavus was detected. Van Warmelo
et al. (1968) found that aflatoxin can accumulate in maize
naturally infected with A. flavus and that moisture and
temperature affect this process.
Holzapfel et al. (1966) showed that sterigmatocystin
was produced by fungi other than A. versicolor (Vuill.)
Tiraboschi and found that three out of five strains of A.
nidulans (Eidam) Wint. caused rapid deaths in ducklings.
A. niger was the most frequent fungus found on dried
fruits and nuts. Wehner & Rabie (1970) indicated that
maize on which A. niger as well as A. flavus was grown
had a detrimental effect on ducklings.
The production of ochratoxin by A. ochraceus Wilhelm
is well documented (Kellerman et al. 1988). The structure
of the mycotoxin has been determined by Van der Merwe
et al. (1965a, b), and Purchase & Theron (1968) illustrated
the acute toxicity of this fungus to rats.
Rabie et al. (1976) grew A. versicolor on various media
and at various temperatures to determine optimum produc-
tion of sterigmatocystin: when Aspergillus isolates ob-
tained from international culture collections were tested
for production of sterigmatocystin, A. aurantio-brunneus
(Atkins, Hindson & Russel) Raper & Fennell, A. quad-
rilineatus Thom & Raper and A. ustus gave positive
results (Rabie et al. 1977). The latter was a local isolate,
producing a low quantity of sterigmatocystin. The effect
it had could have been partly due to other toxins such as
ausdiol, which were not tested for.
A. clavatus produced a tremorgenic substance which
had a lethal effect on cattle and sheep (Kellerman et al.
1976). This fatal substance was produced by the fungus
when it was grown on malt sprouts as well as on sorghum
beer residue (Kellerman et al. 1984). In both cases the
toxin involved was unknown. The mycotoxins cyto-
chalasin E and K were isolated from an isolate of A.
clavatus (Steyn et al. 1982). The tremorgenic and lethal
effect of A. clavatus was illustrated with photographs by
Coetzer et al. (1985) and a similar report was given by
Kellerman et al. (1988).
Dutton & Westlake (1985) tested agricultural com-
modities for fungi and their toxins. They found A. flavus
and A. parasiticus in 22% of the samples whereas 27.2%
of samples yielded aflatoxin B 1 and often also B2, G 1
and G2. Westlake & Dutton (1985) reported on the in-
cidence of mycotoxins in the broiler industry and found
that aflatoxin may depress growth rates and could play a
role in poultry diseases.
Rabie (1986) reviewed contamination of foods by
toxigenic fungi and mycotoxins and discussed law-enfor-
cement problems. Rheeder et al. (1990) warned that
Aspergillus on maize grain should be monitored as it poses
a mycotoxological threat. Liibben (1992) tested various
isolates of fungi obtained from oats and wheat for toxicity
and found that several Aspergillus isolates tested positive.
All isolates that proved to be toxic in the above research
are indicated in the appended checklist with an asterisk
(*) preceding the reference.
Mutagenic activity of various secondary metabolites of
Aspergillus spp. has been indicated by Wehner et al.
(1978), Wehner et al. (1979a, b) and Kfir et al. (1986).
Extracellular enzyme production of Aspergillus spp. was
studied by McLean et al. ( 1985): A. flavus and A. candiclus
Link were found to be prolific enzyme producers. HPLC
determinations of aflatoxin B and G in groundnut seed,
indicated a 79. 1 % presence of A. parasiticus and 20.9%
of A. flavus (Labuschagne & Wehner 1990). McLean et
al. (1990) found that aflatoxin B1 is toxic to callus tissue
of maize.
The large number of references concerning work of a
chemical nature, is beyond the scope of this overview.
However, the following works serve as general references.
A symposium on mycotoxins (Anon. 1965) treated various
aspects of aflatoxin. Purchase & Theron (1967) gave a
comprehensive review of work on mycotoxins in South
Africa. Steyn (1980) summarised studies on secondary
metabolism, highlighting contributions by South African
scientists. The sixth International IUPAC Symposium on
Mycotoxins and Phycotoxins (Steyn & Vleggaar 1986)
was held in South Africa and two local papers on aflatoxin
were included. An update on the mycotoxins produced by
Aspergillus spp., is included in the work of Frisvad (1989).
DISCUSSION
The 25 commonly encountered species of Aspergillus
(Domsch et al. 1980) have all been recorded from
southern Africa, although of the estimated 170-200
described Aspergilli (Christensen & Tuthill 1985), only
72 or about 40% of species with Aspergillus anamorphs
have been traced and included in the checklist. Forty per
cent of all described Aspergillus spp. have been recorded
from single locations or are restricted in geographic dis-
tribution (Christensen & Tuthill 1985); so many probably
do not occur here. This may explain why such a relatively
low percentage of Aspergillus species have been recorded
from southern Africa.
It may be concluded that southern Africa, with its
varied climatic regions and some of the oldest geological
formations in the world, may be a source of Aspergillus
species differing from those already known. Most records
of Aspergilli here have been from foodstuffs, and little
information is available concerning the ecological adap-
tation of members of this genus to the diverse conditions
in this country. It is significant that on the arid Giribes
Plain of Namibia, the dominant genus isolated from soil
in the perplexing bare patches has been Aspergillus (Eick-
er et al. 1982). Unfortunately there is no indication how
many, if any, of those isolates were difficult to identify
and were consequently lumped under the heading ‘ Asper -
176
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
gillus spp.' The same may be true for other surveys such
as those of Eicker (1969, 1970, 1974) and Papendorf
(1976), where unidentified Aspergilli were listed. A survey
of various ecological niches may prove to be a taxonomi-
cally rewarding undertaking and may yield potentially
useful but as yet undescribed species.
South African isolates of Aspergillus have been men-
tioned by authorities such as Thom & Church ( 1926), and
Raper & Fennel (1973) who described A. cristatus Raper
& Fennell on the basis of an isolate ‘received in 1954
from the CBS as H. Swart 168 isolated by H. Swart, S.
Africa’. Neither the authors of this fungus name, nor the
CBS catalogue (see checklist), indicated a substrate or
locality for this isolate. Swart’s (1959) writings however,
stated that his specimen No. 168 was isolated from
mangrove soil, collected on the island of Inhaca off
Maputo [Lourenfo Marques], Mozambique.
Although no local scientist has made a major contribu-
tion to the taxonomy of this group, much attention has
been paid to the detection and characterisation of
mycotoxins, and South Africans have become world
leaders in this field. A large number of references con-
cerning aflatoxin, a metabolite of A. flavus and A.
parasiticus, are available, but these have not been treated
here as they do not refer to specific fungal isolates. The
same goes for other mycotoxins such as austocystins,
ochratoxin and sterigrrlatocystin. It is of interest that
ochratoxin A, B, and C were characterised in South Africa
(Van der Merwe et al. 1965a, b), and their toxicity deter-
mined (Purchase & Theron 1968), but the toxins themsel-
ves have never been isolated here (Mantle & McHugh
1993).
Eicker (1975) found that A. aculeatus had an an-
tagonistic effect on both Staphylococcus and Candida.
Shortly afterwards a secondary metabolite of this fungus,
namely aculeacin A, was found to have strong activity
against filamentous fungi, as well as yeasts (Mizuno et
al. 1977). There may be other members of the group with
similar undetected beneficial characteristics.
Species of Aspergillus such as A. ochraceus K. Wilh.,
A. niger and A. terreus , but especially A. parasiticus, are
known insect pathogens (Domsch et al. 1980). Isolates
from arthropods have been recorded in southern Africa
(Prinsloo 1960), but their potential as agents in biological
control has not been investigated. Aspergillus spp. are
chemically very active and may even be valuable in the
control of plant pathogens.
The value of sophisticated chemical methods employed
by many Aspergillus taxonomists (Samson & Pitt 1985,
1990) as well as that of electron microscopy (Kozakiewicz
1989) has been indicated. They have become indispen-
sable in Hyphomycete taxonomy, but little attention has
been given to these methods in South Africa. Morphologi-
cal and physiological characteristics are almost the only
criteria by which Aspergillus is identified here. Although
this is still the most accessible way of taxonomic deter-
mination, the new techniques could become a powerful
tool in the hand of South African taxonomists.
It is clear that the field for workers on Aspergillus is
wide open, be it in industry, ecology, biological control,
biochemistry, the various pathology disciplines or by im-
plementing the modern methods available to the
taxonomist.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I thank Ms A. P. Baxter of the Plant Protection Re-
search Institute for kindly reviewing a draft of the
manuscript.
REFERENCES
ALLSOPP, N„ OLIVIER. D.L. & MITCHELL. D.T. 1987. Fungal
populations associated with root systems of proteaceous seedlings
at a lowland fynbos site in South Africa. South African Journal of
Botany 53: 365-369.
AL-MUSALLAM, A. 1980. Revision of the black Aspergillus species.
Ph.D. thesis, Utrecht.
ANON. 1965. Symposium on mycotoxins in foodstuff. Agricultural
aspects. Department of Agricultural Technical Services Technical
Communication No. 35: 1-60.
BAK, J.P. & WAGENFELD, D.J.H. 1983. Treatment of otitis externa
with miconazole nitrate. A comparative study involving 85 cases.
South African Medical Journal 63: 562, 563.
BENATAR, S.R. 1977. Aspergillus infection in the western Cape. South
African Medical Journal 5 1 : 297-305.
BENATAR, S.R., KEEN, G.A. & NAUDE, W. DU TOIT 1980. Aspergil-
lus hypersensitivity in asthmatics in Cape Town. Clinical Allergy
10:285-291.
BENJAMIN, C.R. 1955. Ascocarps of Aspergillus and Penicillium.
Mycologia 47 : 669-687.
BERKOWITZ, F.E. & JACOBS, D.W.C. 1987. Fatal case of brain
abscess caused by rooster pecking. Pediatric Infectious Disease
Journal 6: 941, 942.
BEZUIDENHOUT, H. 1977. 'n Ondersoek van die Hyphomycetes geas-
sosieer met Cenchrus ciliaris L. M.Sc. thesis. University of
Pretoria.
BLOCK, C.S. & YOUNG, C.N. 1977. Early diagnosis of opportunistic
systemic fungal and nocardial infections. South African Medical
Journal 52: 1056-1060.
BORNMAN, C.H. 1978. Welwitschia. Paradox of a parched paradise.
Struik Publishers, Cape Town.
BOSMAN, J.L., RABIE, C.J. & PRETORIUS, A.J. 1991. Fungi as-
sociated with high and low tannin sorghum grain in the Republic
of South Africa. Phytophylactica 23: 47-52.
BOTHA, W. & WEHNER, F.C. 1990. Biocontrol of citrus root pathogens
with induced fungal antagonists. Phytophylactica 22: 147
(Abstract).
BRESSAC, B„ KEW, M.. WANDS, J. & OZTURK, M. 1991. Selective
G to T mutations of p53 gene in hepatocellular carcinoma from
southern Africa. Nature 350: 429^43 1 .
CARO, I. & DOGLIOTTI. M. 1973. Aspergillosis of the skin. Report of
a case. Dennatologia 146: 244-248.
CHRISTENSEN, M. 1982. The Aspergillus ochraceus group: two new
species from western soils and a synoptic key. Mycologia 74:
210-225.
CHRISTENSEN, M. & TUTHILL. D.E. 1985. Aspergillus: an overview.
In R.A. Samson & .1.1. Pitt, Advances in Penicillium and Aspergil-
lus systematics. Plenum Press, New York.
COETZER, J.W.A., KELLERMAN, T.S. & NAUDE, T.W. 1985.
Neurotoxicoses of livestock caused by plants and fungi in South
Africa. Republic of South Africa Department of Agriculture and
Water Supply Technical Communication No. 199: 1-34.
COHEN, C. 1950. The occurrence of fungi in the soil, after different
burning and grazing treatments of the veld in the Transvaal. South
African Journal of Science 46: 260-264.
COOPER. D.K.C., LANZA, R.P., OLIVER, S„ FORDER, A.A., ROSE,
A.G., UYS, C.J., NOVITZKY, D. & BARNARD, C.N. 1983.
Infectious complications after heart transplantation. Thorax 38:
822-828.
DAVEL, H.B. & NEETHLING, H.L. 1930. Skimmels en Iml bestryding
in die melkery. Union of South Africa Department of Agriculture
Science Bulletin No. 80: 1-18.
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
177
DE VILL1ERS, J.C. 1989. Endofitiese fungusse teenwoordig in 'n aantal
Suid-Afrikaanse grasspesies. M.Sc. thesis, Potchefstroom
University for C.H.O.
DOIDGE, E.M. 1950. The South African fungi and lichens to the end of
1945. Bothalia 5: 1-1094.
DOIDGE, E.M., BOTTOMLEY, A.M., VAN DER PLANK, J.E. &
PAUER, G.D. 1953. A revised list of plant diseases in South
Africa. Union of South Africa Department of Agriculture Science
Bulletin No. 346: 1-125.
DOIDGE, E.M. & VAN DER PLANK, J.E. 1936. The fungi which cause
rots of stored citrus fruits in South Africa. Union of South Africa
Department of Agriculture and Forestry Science Bulletin No. 1 62:
1-23.
DOMSCH, K.H., GAMS, W. & ANDERSON, T-H. 1980. Compendium
of soil fungi. Academic Press, London.
DUTTON, M.F. & WESTLAKE, K. 1985. Occurrence of mycotoxins in
cereals and animal feedstuffs in Natal, South Africa. Journal of
the Official Analytical Chemists 68: 839-842.
EICKER, A. 1969. Microfungi from surface soil of forest communities in
Zululand. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 53:
381-392.
EICKER, A. 1970a. Ecological observations on soil fungi. South African
Journal of Science 66: 327-334.
EICKER, A. 1970b. Vertical distribution of fungi in Zululand soils.
Transactions of the British Mvcological Society 55: 45-57.
EICKER, A. 1972. Occurrence and isolation of South African ther-
mophilic fungi. South African Journal of Science 68: 150-155.
EICKER, A. 1973. The mycoflora of Eucalyptus maculata leaf litter. Soil
Biology and Biochemistry 5: 441^148.
EICKER, A. 1974. The mycoflora of an alkaline soil of the open-savan-
nah of the Transvaal. Transactions of the British Mvcological
Society 63: 281-288.
EICKER, A. 1975. A survey of the antimycotic and antibacterial activity
of soil microfungi from Transvaal. Journal of South African
Botany 41: 187-198.
EICKER. A. 1976. Non-parasitic mycoflora of the phylloplane and litter
of Panicum coloratum. Transactions of the British Mvcological
Society 61: 275-281.
EICKER, A. 1977. Thermophilic fungi associated with the cultivation of
Agaricus bisporus (Lange) Singer. Journal of South African
Botany AS: 193-207.
EICKER, A. 1980. Mesophilic fungi associated with cultivation of
Agaricus brunnescens. Transactions of the British Mvcological
Society 74: 465^-70.
EICKER, A„ THERON. G.K. & GROBBELAAR, N. 1982. ’n Mik-
robiologiese studie van ‘kaal kolle’ in die Giribesvlakte van
Kaokoland, S.W.A.-Namibie. South African Journal of Botany 1:
69-74.
FINDLAY, G.H., ROUX, H.F. & SIMPSON, I.W. 1971. Skin manifesta-
tions in disseminated aspergillosis. British Journal of Dermatol-
ogy 85, Supplement 7: 94—97.
FITZSIMONS, R. & PETERS, A.L. 1986. Miconazole and ketoconazole
as a satisfactory first-line treatment for keratomycosis. American
Journal of Opthalmology 101: 605-608.
FRISVAD, J.C. 1989. The connection between the Penicillia and Asper-
gilli and mycotoxins with special emphasis on misidentified iso-
lates. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
18:452^167.
GAMS, W. & SAMSON, R.A. 1985. Typification of Aspergillus and
related teleomorphs. In R.A. Samson & J.I. Pitt, Advances in
Penicillium and Aspergillus systematics. Plenum Press, New
York.
GILMAN, G.A. 1972. Report of a survey of food storage and handling
techniques used in eastern Transvaal and Swaziland with special
reference to fungal contamination in the diet and the incidence of
liver cancer in man, Feb. 1968-Dec. 1971. R397: 1-126. Tropi-
cal Products Institute, Ministry of Overseas Developement, Lon-
don.
GLASS, R.B.J, HERTZANU. Y„ MENDELSOHN, D.B. & POSEN, J.
1984. Paranasal sinus aspergillosis. A case report with computed
tomogram findings. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 98:
199-205.
GORTER. G.J.M.A. 1977. Index of plant pathogens and the diseases they
cause in cultivated plants. Department of Agricultural Technical
Sevices Science Bulletin No. 329: 1-177.
GORTER, G.J.M.A. 1979. An annotated checklist and selected bibliog-
raphy of South African fungi for the period 1946-1977. Republic
of South Africa Department of Agricultural Technical Services
Technical Communication No. 163: 1-34.
GOVENDER, S„ RAJOO, R.. GOGA, I.E. & CHARLES, R.W. 1991.
Aspergillus osteomyelitis of the spine. Spine 16: 746-749.
HOLZAPFEL, C.W., PURCHASE, I.F.H., STEYN, PS. & GOUWS, L.
1966. The toxicity and chemical assay of sterigmatocystin, a
carcinogenic mycotoxin, and its isolation from two new fungal
sources. South African Medical Journal 40: 1100, 1101.
HOR1E, Y. 1980. Ascospore ornamentation and its application to the
taxonomic re-evaluation in Emericella. Transactions of the
Mycological Society of Japan 21: 483^193.
ISAACS, J. & BENIC, L.M. 1990. A study of the fungal mycoflora
associated with stored seeds of eight indigenous families.
Phytophylactica 22: 154 (Abstract).
ISAACSON, C. 1966. The aetiology of cirrhosis and hepatoma in the
bantu — an appraisal. South African Medical Journal 40: 1 1-13.
JACOBS. R, FRIEDBERG, E.C. & VAN NIEKERK, V. 1965. Pul-
monary aspergillosis in a white South African farmer. The Central
African Journal of Medicine 1 1 : 155-160.
JAIN, PC. & LACEY, J. 1991. Use of API-Zym strips and 4-nitrophenyl
substrates to detect and quantify hydrolytic enzymes in media and
grain colonized with Asperigillus, Eurotium and Penicillium
species. Mycological Research 95: 834—842.
JOUBERT, J.R., BRINK, S. & HENTZEN, G.M. 1988. Allergic asthma
in different population groups in the western Cape. Causative and
complicating factors. South African Medical Journal 73: 150-
154.
KALLENBACH, J., DUSHEIKO. J. BLOCH. C.S., BETHLEHEM, B„
KOORNHOF, H.J. & ZW1, S. 1977. Aspergillus pneumonia — a
cluster of four cases in intensive care unit. South African Medical
Journal 52: 919-923.
KELLERMAN, T.S., COETZER, J.A.W & NAUDE. T.W. 1988. Plant
poisonings and mycotoxicosis of livestock in southern Africa.
Oxford University Press, Cape Town.
KELLERMAN, T.S., NEWSHOLME, S.J., COETZER, J.A.W. & VAN
DER WESTHUIZEN, G.C.A. 1984. A tremorgenic
mycotoxicosis of cattle caused by maize sprouts infested with
Aspergillus clavatus. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Re-
search S\: 21 \-21 A.
KELLERMAN. T.S., PIENAAR, J.G., VAN DER WESTHUIZEN,
G.C.A. , ANDERSON, L.A.P. & NAUDE, T.W. 1976. Highly
fatal tremorgenic mycotoxicosis of cattle caused by Aspergillus
clavatus. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 43: 147—
154.
KFIR, R„ JOHANNSEN. E. & VLEGGAAR. R. 1986. Mutagenic ac-
tivity of austocystins — secondary metabolites of Aspergillus
ustus. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
37: 643-650.
KLICH, M.A. & PITT, J.I. 1988. Differentiation of Aspergillus flavus
from A. parasiticus and other closely related species. Transac-
tions of the British Mycological Society 91 : 99-108.
KOZAKIEWICZ, Z. 1989. Aspergillus species on stored products.
Mycological Papers Ho. 161: 1-188.
KURTZMAN, C.P., SMILEY. M.J., ROBNETT. C.J. & WICKLOW,
D.T. 1986. DNA relatedness among wild and domesticated
species in the Aspergilus flavus group. Mycologia 78: 955-959.
LABUSCHAGNE, C.L.E. & WEHNER, F.C. 1990. The occurrence of
Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus on certified groundnut seed
in South Africa. Phytophylactica 22: 158 (Abstract).
LAMPRECHT, S.C., KNOX-DAVIES, PS. & MARASAS, W.F.O. 1988.
Fungi associated with root rot of annual Medicago spp. in South
Africa. Phytophylactica 20: 281-286.
LE ROUX, G„ ESCHENBRUCH, R. & DE BRUIN, S.I. 1973. The
microbiology of South African wine-making. Part 8. The
microflora of healthy and Botrytis cinerea infected grapes.
Phytophylactica 5: 51-54.
LEWIS, M., KALLENBACH, J., RUFF, P, ZALTZMAN, M„
ABRAMOW1TZ, J. & ZWI, S. 1985. Invasive pulmonary asper-
gillosis complicating influenza. A pneumonia in a previously
healthy patient. Chest 87: 691-693.
LUBBEN, A. 1992. Die insidensie en toksisiteit van fungi in koring- en
hawergraan in die RSA. M.Sc thesis, University of Pretoria.
LUCK, H. & WEHNER, F.C. 1979. Mycotoxins in milk and dairy
products. South African Journal of Dairy Technology 11: 169 —
176.
LUCK, H., WEHNER, F.C., PLOMP, A & STEYN, M. 1976.
Mycotoxins in South African cheeses. South African Journal of
Dairy Technology 8: 107-110.
LUNDQUIST, J.E. 1987. Fungi associated with Pinus in South Africa.
Part 2. The Cape. South African Forestry Journal 140: 4-15.
LUNDQUIST, J.E. & BAXTER, A.P 1985. Fungi associated with
Eucalyptus in South Africa. South African Forestry Journal 135:
9-19.'
178
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
MANTLE, P.G. & McHUGH, K.M. 1993. Nephrotoxic fungi in foods
from nephropathy households in Bulgaria. Mycological Research
97: 205-212.
MARASAS, W.F.O. 1988. Medical relevance of mycotoxins in southern
Africa. Microbiologie Aliments Nutrition 6: 1-5.
MARASAS, W.F.O. & BREDELL, I.H. 1973. Mycoflora of South
African lucerne ( Medicago saliva L.) seed. Phytophylactica 5:
89-94.
MARASAS, W.F.O. & VAN RENSBURG, S.J. 1986. Mycotoxicological
investigations on maize and groundnuts from the endemic area of
Mseleni joint disease in Kwazulu. South African Medical Journal
69: 369-374.
MARASAS, W.F.O., WEHNER, F.C., VAN RENSBURG, S.J. & VAN
SCHALKWYK, D.J. 1981. Mycoflora of corn produced in
human oesophageal cancer areas in Transkei, southern Africa.
Phytopathology 71: 792-796.
MARTIN, J.P. I960. Fungi and nematodes in South African citrus orchard
soils in relation to the citrus replant problem. Soil Science Society
of America Proceedings 24: 469^472.
MARTIN, P.M.D. & BERSON, S.D. 1973. Fungus diseases in southern
Africa. Mycopathologia et Mycologia Applicata 50: 1-84.
MCLEAN. M, & BERJAK, P. 1987. Maize grains and their associated
mycoflora — a micro-ecological consideration. Seed Science and
Technology 15: 831-850.
MCLEAN, M„ MYCOCK, D.J. & BERJAK, P. 1985. A preliminary
investigation of extracellular enzyme production by some species
of Aspergillus. South African Journal of Botany 5 1 : 425^13 1 .
MCLEAN, M„ WATT. M.P., BERJAK. P. & DUTTON, M.F. 1990.
Maize callus — a tool for studying the effects of aflatoxin B1 on
plant cells. Phytophylactica 22: 150 (Abstract).
MIZUNO, K„ YAGI, A., SATOI, S„ TAKADA, M„ HAYASHI, M„
ASANO, K. & MATSUDA, T. 1977. Studies of aculeacin. 1.
Isolation and characterization of aculeacin A. The Journal of
Antibiotics 30: 297-302.
MYCOCK, D.J. & BERJAK, P. 1990. Fungal comtaminants associated
with several homoiohydrous (recalcitrant) seed species.
Phytophylactica 22: 413-418.
MYCOCK, D.J. & BERJAK, P. 1992. Intraseminal fungal location in
maize of selected seed storage fungi in relation to some
physiological parameters. South African Journal of Botany 58:
139-144.
MYCOCK, D.J., RIJKENBERG, F.H.J. & BERJAK, P. 1990. Infection
of maize seedlings by Aspergillus flavus var. columnaris var. nov.
‘Seed Science and Technology 18: 693-701.
NEITZ, W.O. 1965. A checklist and host-list of the zoonoses occurring in
mammals and birds in South and South West Africa.
Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 32: 189-374.
NESBIT, J.W. 1986. The pathology of pulmonary aspergillosis in a piglet.
Journal of the South African Veterinary Association 57: 125-127.
ORDMAN, D. 1963. The airborne fungi in Johannesburg. A second
five-year survey: 1955-1959. South African Medical Journal 37:
325-328.
ORDMAN, D. 1970. Seasonal respiratory allergy in Windhoek: the pol-
len and fungus factors. South African Medical Journal 44: 250-
253.
ORDMAN, D. & ETTER, K.G. 1956. The airborne fungi in Johannes-
burg. A five-year survey as a basis for the study of fungus allergy
in South Africa. South African Medical Journal 30: 1054—1058.
PAPENDORF, M.C. 1976. The soil mycoflora of an Acacia karroo
community in western Transvaal. Bothalia 12: 123-127.
PEERS, F.G., GILMAN, G.A. & LINSELL, C.A. 1976. Dietary
aflatoxins and human liver cancer. A study in Swaziland. Interna-
tional Journal of Cancer 17: 167-176.
PETERSON, S.W. 1992. Neosartorya pseudqfischeri sp. nov. and its
relationship to other species in Aspergillus section Fumigati.
Mycological Research 96: 547-554.
PITT, J.I. & SAMSON, R.A. 1990. Approaches to Penicillium and Asper-
gillus systematics. Studies in Mycology 32: 77-90.
PITT, J.I. & SAMSON, R.A. 1993. Species names in current use in the
Trichocontaceae (Fungi, Eurotiales). In W. Greuter, Names in
current use in the families Trichocomaceae, Cladoniaceae,
Pinaceae, and Lerrmaceae. Koeltz Scientific Books, Germany.
POTTER, PC., JURWITZ, J„ LITTLE, F„ McCALDIN, M. &
DOWDLE, E.B. 1991. Clustering of fungal allergen-specific IgE
antibody responses in allergic subjects. Annals of Allergy 66:
149-153.
PRETORIUS, W.A. & LEMPERT, G.G. 1993a. The selective cultivation
of the thermololerant Aspergillus sp. on spent sulphite liquor.
Water SA 19:69-72.
PRETORIUS, W.A. & LEMPERT, G.G. 1993b. Growth characteristics of
Aspergillus sp. grown on spent sulphite liquor. Water SA 19:
73-76.
PRETORIUS, W.A. & LEMPERT, G.G. 1993c. Biomass production of
Aspergillus fumigatus on spent sulphite liquor under non-aseptic
conditions. Water SA 19: 77-80.
PRINSLOO, G.C., BAARD, S.W. & FERREIRA, J.F. 1991. Organisms
associated with black root rot of chicory in South Africa.
Phytophylactica 23: 59-67.
PRINSLOO, H.E. 1960. Parasitiese mikro-organismes by die bruin-
sprinkaan Locustana pardalina (Walk.). South African Journal of
Agricultural Science 3: 551-560.
PROZESKY. O.P.M., BUYS, S.B., VAN DER MADE, H.N., DE WET,
P.J. & BROWN, J.J.M. 1971. Aspergillus fumigatus infection in
scaly weaver ( Sporopipes squamifrons). Journal of the South
African Veterinary and Medical Association 42: 175-178.
PURCHASE, I.F.H. & THERON, JJ. 1967. Research on mycotoxins in
South Africa. International Pathology 8: 3-6.
PURCHASE, I.F.H. & THERON, J.J. 1968. The acute toxicity of
ochratoxin A to rats. Food and Cosmetic Toxicology 6: 479- 483.
PURCHASE, I.F.H. & VORSTER, L.J. 1968. Aflatoxin in commercial
milk samples. South African Medical Journal 42: 219.
RABIE, C.J. 1986. Mikotoksienprobleme in Suid-Afrikaanse voed-
selkommoditeite. Suid-Afrikaanse Tydskrif vir Natuurwetenskap
en Tegnologie 5: 151-153.
RABIE, C.J., DE KLERK, W.A. & TERBLANCHE, M. 1964. Toxicity
of Aspergillus amstelodami to poultry and rabbits. South African
Journal of Science 7: 314-346.
RABIE, C.J. & LUBBEN, A. 1984. The mycoflora of sorghum malt.
South African Journal of Botany 3: 251-255.
RABIE, C.J., LUBBEN, A. & STEYN, M. 1976. Production of sterig-
matocystin by Aspergillus versicolor and Bipolaris sorokiniana
on semisynthetic liquid and solid media. Applied and Environ-
mental Microbiology 32: 206-208.
RABIE, C.J., STEYN, M. & VAN SCHALKWYK, G.C. 1977. New
species of Aspergillus producing sterigmatocystin. Applied and
Environmental Microbiology 33: 1023-1025.
RABIE, C.J., STEYN, P.S. & VAN HEERDEN, F.R. 1986. The isolation
and identification of some toxic constituents of Aspergillus wentii
Wehmer. Mycotoxin Research 2: 19-24.
RABIE, C.J. & TERBLANCHE, M. 1967. Influence of temperature on
the toxicity of different isolates of Aspergillus wentii Wehm.
South African Journal of Agricultural Science 10: 263-266.
RABIE, C.J., TERBLANCHE, M„ SMIT, J.D. & DE KLERK, W.A.
1965. Toxicity of Aspergillus wentii Wehmer. South African Jour-
nal of Agricultural Science 8: 875-880.
RAPER, K.B. & FENNELL, D.I. 1973. The genus Aspergillus. Krieger
Publishing Company, New York.
RHEEDER, J.P., MARASAS, W.F.O., VAN WYK, P.S., DU TOIT, W„
PRETORIUS, A.J. & VAN SCHALKWYK, D.J. 1990. Incidence
of Fusarium and Diplodia species and other fungi in naturally
infected grain of South African maize cultivars. Phytophylactica
22: 97-102.
ROSSELET, F. 1953. Aspergillus niger as a test organism for measuring
plant available potassium in lowveld soils. South African Journal
of Science 50: 344—347.
ROSSELET, F. 1955. Bio-assay of P, K and Mg in citrus fertilizer plots
using Aspergillus niger. South African Journal of Science 5 1 :
331-335.
ROTH, G. 1963. Post harvest decay of litchi fruit. Republic of South
Africa Department of Agricultural Technical Services Technical
Communication No. 11: 1-16.
ROTH, G. 1968. Biological treatment of molasses meal to reduce sticki-
ness. Proceedings of the South African Sugar Technologists' As-
sociation April: 57-64.
ROTH, G. & LOEST, F.C. 1965. Collar rot of banana hands and its
associated micro-organisms. Republic of South Africa Depart-
ment of Agricultural Technical Services Technical Communica-
tion No. 44: 1-14.
ROUX, C. 1985. The morphology and taxonomy of some fungi selected
from a survey of a natural Karoo pasture. Ph.D. thesis, Rand
Afrikaans University.
RUSSELL, A.E. 1981. Protection of wet-blue leathers against fungal
growth. Liri Research Bulletin No. 813: 1-14.
SACHO, H„ STEAD, K.J., KLUGMAN, K.P. & LAWRENCE, Z. 1987.
Infection of the human orbit by Aspergillus stromatoides.
Mycopathologia 97: 97-99.
SAMSON, R.A. 1979. A compilation of the Aspergilli described since
1965. Studies in Mycology No. 18: 1-38.
SAMSON, R.A. & GAMS. W. 1985. Typification of the species of
Aspergillus and associated teleomorphs. In R.A. Samson &
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
179
J.l. Pitt, Advances in Penicillium and Aspergillus systemaiics.
Plenum Press, New York.
SAMSON, R.A. & PITT, J.l. 1985. Advances in Penicillium and Asper-
gillus systematics. Plenum Press, New York.
SAMSON, R.A. & PITT, J.l. 1990. Modem concepts in Penicillium and
Aspergillus classification. Plenum Press, New York.
SCOTT, D.B. 1965. Toxigenic fungi isolated from cereal and legume
products. Mycopathologia et Mycologia Applicata 25: 213-222.
SMIT, M. 1984. ’n Studie van verskdlende deklaagmateriale in die
kommersiele verbouing van Agaricus brunnescens Peck. M.Sc.
thesis. University of Pretoria.
STEINKE, T.D., BARNABAS, A.D. & SOMARU, R. 1990. Structural
changes and associated microbial activity accompanying decom-
position of mangrove leaves in Mgeni Estuary. South African
Journal of Botany 56: 39 — 48.
STEYN, P.S. 1980. The biosynthesis of mycotoxins. A study in secondary
metabolism. Academic Press, New York, London.
STEYN, P.S., VAN HEERDEN, F.R. & RAB1E, C.J. 1982. Cytochalasins
E and K, toxic metabolites from Aspergillus clavatus. Journal of
the Chemical Society Perkin 1 2: 541-544.
STEYN, P.S. & VLEGGAAR, R. 1986. Mycotoxins and phycotoxins.
Papers presented at the sixth International IUPAC Symposium.
Elsevier, Amsterdam.
SWART, H.J. 1959. Observations on fungus cultures from the collection
in the Botany Department of the University of the Witwatersrand.
2. Some ascosporic species of Aspergillus. South African Journal
of Science 55: 51-53.
THIEL, P.G. 1986. Mikotoksiene en gesondheidsrisiko's. Tydskrif vir
Natuurwetenskap en Tegnologie 5: 154-156.
THOM, C. & CHURCH. M.B. 1926. The Aspergilli. Baltimore, Williams
& Wilkins.
TIEDT, L.R. 1992. Conidiogenesis in Aspergillus niger. Thirtieth annual
congress of the South African Society for Plant Pathology.
Phytophylactica 24: 127 (Abstract).
VAN DER BIJL, P.A. 1920. Studies on some fungi and the deterioration
of sugar. Union of South Africa Department of Agriculture
Science Bulletin No. 18: 1-19.
VAN DER MERWE, K.J., STEYN, P.S. & FOURIE, L. 1965a.
Mycotoxins Part 2. The constitution of ochratoxin A, B and C,
metabolites of Aspergillus ochraceus Wilh. Journal of the Chemi-
cal Society December 1965: 7083-7088.
VAN DER MERWE, K.J., STEYN, P.S., FOURIE, L„ SCOTT, D.B. &
THERON, J.J. 1965b. Ochratoxin A, a toxic metabolite produced
by Aspergillus ochraceus Wilh. Nature 205: 1112, 1113.
VAN DER MERWE. W.J.J., EICKER. A., MARASAS, W.F.O. & KEL-
LERMAN, T.S. 1979. Aerospora of an Eragrostis curvula pasture
in South Africa. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research
46: 19-25.
VAN DER WESTHUIZEN, G.C.A. & BREDELL, I.H. 1972. The fungus
flora of high quality stored maize in South Africa, 1966-1972.
Final Report. Republic of South Africa, Department of Agricul-
tural Technical Services. Unpublished.
VAN WARMELO, K.T. 1967. The fungus flora of stock feeds in South
Africa. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 34: 439-
450.
VAN WARMELO, K.T., VAN DER WESTHUIZEN, G.C.A. & MIN-
NIE, J.A. 1968. The production of aflatoxins in naturally infected
high quality maize. Republic of South Africa, Department of
Agricultural Technical Services, Technical Communication No.
71: 1-5.
VERWOERD, L. 1929. A preliminary checklist of diseases of cultivated
plants in the winter rainfall area of the Cape Province. Union of
South Africa, Department of Agricultural Science Bulletin No.
88: 1-18.
WATSON, R.T., ANELICH, R. & SCHUTTE, A.L. 1990. Fungi in the
gut contents of Namib Desert dune Lepismatidae (Thysanura:
Insecta). Madoqua 17: 53, 54.
WEHNER, F.C., BESTER, S„ KOTZE, J.M. & BRODRICK, H.T. 1981.
Fungi associated with post-harvest decay of mangoes in South
Africa. South African Mango Grower's Association Research
Report 2: 81-88.
WEHNER, F.C. & RABIE, C.J. 1970. The micro-organisms in nuts and
dried fruits. Phytophylactica 2: 165-170.
WEHNER, F.C., THIEL, P.G. & DU RAND. M. 1979a. Mutagenicity of
the mycotoxin emodin in the Salmonella/microsome system. Ap-
plied and Environmental Microbiology 37: 658-660.
WEHNER. F.C., THIEL, S.J., VAN RENSBURG, S.J. & DEMASIUS,
I. PC. 1978. Mutagenicity to Salmonella typhimurium of some
Aspergillus and Penicillium mycotoxins. Mutation Research 58:
193-203.
WEHNER, F.C., THIEL, P.G. & VLEGGAAR, R. 1979b. Mutagenicity
of 5,6-dimethoxysterigmatocystine, a metabolite from Aspergil-
lus multicolor, in the Salmonella! microsome system. Applied and
Environmental Microbiology 38: 1015-1017.
WEIDEMAN, H„ OPPERMAN, L. & WEHNER, F.C. 1990. Micro-
organisms antagonistic to Rhizoctonia solani causing crater dis-
ease of wheat in soils of the Springbok Flats. Phytophylactica 22:
154 (Abstract).
WESTLAKE, K. & DUTTON, M.F. 1985. The incidence of mycotoxins
in litter, feeds, and livers of chickens in Natal. South African
Journal of Animal Science 15: 175- 177.
CHECKLIST OF ASPERGILLUS, CHAETOSARTORYA, EMERICELLA, EUROPIUM, FENNELL1A. NEOSARTORYA (= SARTORYA)
AND SCLEROCLE1STA RECORDED IN SOUTHERN AFRICA
Aspergillus spp. recorded in southern Africa up to 1 993 are arranged alphabetically and the host and/or substrate from which each species was recorded
is given with the relevant literature reference. Species names as well as substrates are listed as cited in the original publications. To update the
nomenclature, cross references to names currently accepted are given and Samson (1979), Horie (1980), Samson & Gams (1985), Samson & Pitt
(1985, 1990), Kozakiewicz (1989) as well as Pitt & Samson (1993) were consulted. Aspergillus is essentially an anamorphic genus but until recently
anamorphic as well as teleomorphic states were grouped under this genus. These two states have now been separated and are therefore listed separately:
Aspergillus spp. followed by the teleomorphic genera in alphabetical order. In some cases there is more than one reference, or additional culture
collection numbers for the same isolate: these are given in square brackets.
The following abbreviations are used in the list:
CBS, South African isolates listed in the 1990 List of Cultures of the Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, 32nd edition, Baam, The Netherlands.
IMI, cultures listed in the 1992 Catalogue of the Culture Collection, 10th edition, CAB International Mycological Institute, Kew, United Kingdom.
PPRI, isolates in the Culture Collection of the National Collection of Fungi. Isolates identified or verified by Z. Lawrence (nee Kozakiewicz) of the
IMI (pers. comm.) are indicated as ver. Z.L. IMI.
PREM, dried material in the National Collection of Fungi. Those specimens that were identified by the CBS are indicated.
The National Collection of Fungi has acquired additional fungal collections over the years. Aspergillus isolates in these collections (many no longer
viable) are listed under the following abbreviations:
CSIR, isolates listed in a collection received from the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research.
MCP, the collection of Papendorf (1979) received from the University of Pochefstroom for C.H.E. Isolates are listed under the substrate soil, but
some could have been from Acacia karroo litter.
TRL, a collection of the Transvaal Chamber of Mines, some isolates determined by Thom, as listed by Doidge (1950).
UCT, a collection obtained from the University of Cape Town containing isolates of Allsopp et aL (1987).
VdB, records in the Van der Bijl collection which is administered by the National Collection of Fungi; some are mentioned by Van der Bijl (1920).
# State of the fungus uncertain.
* Aspergillus species indicated as toxic.
180
Bothalia 24,2 ( 1994)
GENUS ASPERGILLUS
aculeatus (see A. japonicus)
allahabadii B.S. Mehrotra & Agnihorti
litter: Eicker (1973)
soil: Eicker (1969, 1970a, b)
alliaceus Thom & Church
aerospora: IMI 087 209
cereals and legume products: Scott (1965)
grass litter: PPRI 3638
Medicago spp.: Lamprecht et al. (1988) [PREM 48323, 48324]
soil: PPRI 3185 [PREM 49038]; CSIR 556
alutaceus (see A. ochraceus)
ambiguus Sappa
Zea mays : Van der Westhuizen & Bredell (1972)
amstelodami (see Eurotium amstelodami)
avenaceus G. Sm.
cereals and legume products: *Scott (1965)
cornmeal: CBS 237.65
soil: CSIR 826
awamori Nakaz.
aeropsora: PPRI 4098
grass hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
groundnut hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
lucerne hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
maize hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
swine meal: Van Warmelo (1967)
caespitosus Raper & Thom
Zea mays : Van der Westhuizen & Bredell (1972)
campestris M. Chr.
mouse nest material: PPRI 4080 [PREM 50885, ver. Z.L. IMI 344 489]
candidus Link
Avena sativa : *Liibben (1992)
cereals and legume products: Scott (1965)
cheese: Doidge (1950)
cotton wool: PPRI 3841
maize meal: Van Warmelo (1967)
man: Martin & Berson (1973)
mouse nest material: PREM 50887
pasture: Roux (1985)
peanut butter/meal/kemels: Gilman (1972)
peat: Smit (1984)
soil: PPRI 4081 [id. Z.L. IMI 344 490], 4518; CSIR 113, 114, 115,
116 [PREM 49364]
sorghum: CSIR 544
sorghum malt: Rabie & Liibben (1984)
swine meal: Van Warmelo (1967)
Zea mays'. Gilman (1972); McLean & Berjak (1985); Van der West-
huizen & Bredell (1972); Van Warmelo et al. (1968); PPRI
3713 [PREM 49889]
carbonarius (Bainier) Thom
Eucalyptus spp. Lundquist & Baxter (1985) |PPR1 3776, PREM 47143]
undetermined host: IMI 138 280 [CBS 111.80]
Vitis vinifera : Doidge (1950) [Doidge et al. (1953); Gorter (1977)]
cameus Blochwitz
cereals and legume products: *Scott (1965)
leather: PPRI 3635
peat: Smit (1984)
soil: Eicker(1974, 1975); Eicker et al. (1982); Papendorf (1976) |MCP
131, 133, PPRI 3636]; CSIR 239, 240, 241, 243
undetermined host: CSIR 1208, 1210, 1211 [PPRI 3570, PREM 49363]
cervinus Massee
litter: Eicker (1973)
soil: UCT [PPRI 3284]
chevalieri (see Eurotium chevalieri)
chevalieri var. intermedius (see Eurotium cristatum)
clavatoflavus Raper & Fennell
man: Martin & Berson (1973)
clavatus Desm.
Avena sativa: Liibben (1992)
cereals and legume products: *Scott (1965)
compost: Eicker (1980)
grass roots: PREM 49066
Hordeum vulgare: PREM 47911
maize sprouts: *Kellerman et al. (1984)
peanut butter/meal/kemels: Gilman (1972)
soil: CSIR 133; MCP 1302
sorghum: CSIR: 304, 519, 520
sorghum beer residue: *Coetzer et al. (1985); *Kellerman et al. ( 1 976);
PREM *44972, 45108
sorghum malt : Rabie & Liibben (1984); Steyn et al. (1982)
Zea mays: Van der Westhuizen & Bredell (1972); PREM 44702, 44708,
45046, 48598; CSIR 61, 519, 520
cremeus (see Chaetosartorya cremea)
cristatus (see Eurotium cristatum)
duricaulis Raper & Fennell
Hakea sericea roots: Allsopp et al (1987)
Leucospennum parile roots: Allsopp et al. (1987)
soil: All sop et al. (1987) [UCT]
eburneus (see Fennellia nivea)
echinulatus (see Eurotium echinulatum)
effusus (see A. oryzae)
elegans Gasperini
lucerne hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
maize hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
ficuum (see A. niger var. ticuum)
fischeri (see Neosartorya Fischeri)
fischeri var. glaber (see Neosartorya glabra)
fischeri var. spinosus (see Neosartorya spinosa)
tlavipes (see Fennellia flavipes)
flavus Link
aerospora: Doidge (1950); IMI 089 137
agricultural commodities: Dutton & Westlake (1985)
apricot: Klich & Pitt (1988)
Arachis hypogaea: Anon. (1965); Gorter ( 1977); Marasas & Van Rens-
burg (1986)
Avena sativa: *Liibben (1992)
Avicennia seeds: PREM 47526
barley: Klich & Pitt (1988)
beer: Martin & Keen (1978)
biltong: CSIR 1413 [PREM 47906], 1414 [PREM 47908]
Cenchrus ciliaris: Bezuidenhout (1977)
cereals and legume products: *Scott (1965)
chicken feeds and litter: Westlake & Dutton (1985)
coconut matting: ; PREM 33293 [TRL det. CBS]
Cussonia paniculata seed: PPRI 3643
debris: PPRI 3200
face cream: PPRI 3273, 3274, 3275, 3276, 3277, 3278
fenugreek: Klich & Pitt (1988)
flannel bag: Doidge (1950) [TRL det. Thom]
fodder: PREM 43024, 47799
foodstuff: Marasas (1988); Purchase & Vorster (1968)
grapes: Le Roux et al. (1973)
grass hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
groundnut seeds/hay: Labuschagne & Wehner (1990); Van Warmelo
(1967)
insects (dead Chrysomelidae spp.): PPRI 5062
Litchi chinensis: Roth (1963)
litter: Eicker (1973)
lucerne hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
maize meal/silage: Van Warmelo (1967)
malt: Klich & Pitt (1988)
man: Martin & Berson (1973)
manure: PPRI 3475 [PREM 49335]
material: Doidge (1950)
molasses meal: Roth (1968)
natural gum: Roth (1968)
nuts/dried fruit: *Wehner & Rabie (1970)
Nicotiana tabacum: Doidge (1950)
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
181
oats: Klich & Pitt (1988)
paper: PPRI 3644
pasture: Roux (1985)
peanut: Klich & Pitt (1988)
peanut butter/meal/kemels: Gilman (1972)
sclerotia (Sclerotinia sclerotionim ): PREM 47228
soil: Allsop et al. (1987); Eicker (1969, 1970a, 1974, 1975) [PREM
44262]; Papendorf (1976); Weideman el al. (1990); CSIR, 203,
204. 205, 209, 211, 212, 213, 215, 216, 217, 222, 223, 224,
225, 229, 231, 237
sorghum: CSIR 299
sorghum malt: Rabie & Liibben (1984)
sugar cane cariopsis: PREM 47532
sunflower hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
sunflower seed: Klich & Pitt (1988)
swine meal: Van Warmelo (1967)
termite comb ( Macrotermes bellicosus ): Doidge (1950) [PREM 1 253 1
termites (dead Hodotermes mossambicus ): PPRI 3753
Triticum aestivum: Liibben (1992)
Zea mays: Gilman (1972); Marasas & Van Rensburg (1986); McLean
& Beijak (1985, 1987); Mycock et al. (1990); Van der West-
huizen & Bredell (1972); Van Warmelo et al. (1968); PREM
44927, 44952, 47530, 47552, 47553; CSIR 57, 63, 136, 146,
283, 500, 501, 508, 515, 776, 840, 843, 848, 851, 852, 856,
857
= flavus var. colwrmaris Raper & Fennell
compost: Eicker (1980)
cornmeal: CBS 242.65
soil; CSIR 147, 151; MCP 49
sorghum malt: Rabie & Liibben (1984)
Zea mays: Mycock et al. (1990): PREM 47529
flavus var. columnaris (see A. flavus)
foetidus Thom & Raper
Allium cepa: PPRI 4046 [PREM 49175]
leather: PREM 48031
fumigatus Fresen.
aerospora: Roth (1968)
antigen of: Benatar et al. (1980)
Avena sativa: Liibben (1992)
bagasse: PPRI 4975
birds: Doidge (1950)
‘blesbok’ dung (Damaliscus dorcas phillipsii): Eicker (1972)
cereals and legume products: *Scott (1965)
compost: Smit (1984); PPRI 3477 [PREM 49330], 3479 [PREM
42090]
duck (Anatidae spp.): Doidge (1950)
faeces of Cape sparrow ( Passer melanurus ): Eicker (1972)
fowl ( Gallus domesticus): Neitz (1967)
groundnut seeds: Van Warmelo (1967)
Hakea sericea roots: Allsopp et al. (1987)
jackass penguin (Sphenicus demursus): Doidge (1950); Neitz (1967)
king penguin (Aptenodites pathagonica): Neitz (1967)
Leucospermum parile roots: Allsopp et al. (1987)
litter: Eicker (1976)
lucerne hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
maize silage: Van Warmelo (1967)
man: Jacobs et al. (1965); Findley et al. (1971); Martin & Berson
(1973); Caro (1973); Block & Young (1977): Kallenbach et al.
(1977); Cooper et al. (1983); Lewis et al. (1985); Joubert et
al. (1988); Govender et al. (1991)
molasses meal: Roth (1968)
mushroom compost: Eicker (1977); PREM 42090
natural gum: Roth (1968)
onion seed: PREM 44770
ostrich ( Struthio camelus): Doidge (1950); Neitz (1967)
peat: Smit (1984)
scaly weaver ( Sporopipes squamifrons ): Prozesky et al. (1971)
sclerotia ( Sclerotinia sclerotionim ): PREM 47929
soil: Allsopp et al. (1987) [UCT[; Cohen (1950); Eicker (1974. 1975);
Eicker et al. (1982); Martin (1960); Papendorf (1976) [MCP
340]; PPRI 3283; CSIR 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 94. 97, 98, 99
sorghum: CSIR 305 [PPRI 3290], 306
sorghum malt: Rabie & Liibben (1984)
spent sulphite liquor: Pretorius & Lempert (1993a, b, c)
straw: PPRI 3478 [PREM 49331]
sugar: Van der Bijl (1920) [VdB 906, Doidge 1950. PREM 14258]
swine meal: Van Warmelo (1967)
turkey ( Meleagris gallopavo): Neitz (1967)
undetermined host: CSIR 1203
Zea mays: Van der Westhuizen & Bredell (1972); CSIR 160, 552, 567
= fumigatus var. ellipticus Raper & Fennell
fodder: PPRI 4687
grass roots: PREM 49065
soil: PPRI 3210
fumigatus var. ellipticus (see A. fumigatus)
giganteus Wehmer
sorghum malt: Rabie & Liibben (1984)
glaucus (see Eurotium herbariorum )
heteromorphus Bat. & H. Maia
medical supplies: PPRI 4688
japonicus Saito
grapes: Le Roux et al. (1973)
litter: Eicker (1973)
soil: Eicker (1969. 1970a, 1975); PPRI 4070; PREM 44279
= aculeatus Iizuka
debris: PPRI 3842 [PREM 50884], 4097
grass roots: PPRI 3326 [PREM 49201, ver. Z.L. IMI 343 117]
soil: Eicker (1974, 1975); PPRI 4227, 4286 [PREM 50884],
4962
Trichilia seeds: PPRI 4854
Zea mays: PPRI 4858
mangini (see Eurotium herbariorum)
melleus Yukawa
citrus fruits: Doidge & Van der Plank (1936)
Medicago sativa seed: Marasas & Bredell (1973) [PREM 44411,
44495, 44518]; PPRI 4228 [PREM 50862]
= quercinus (Bain.) Thom & Church
Litchi chinensis: Roth (1963)
minutus (see A. ustus)
multicolor Sappa
debris: PPRI 3840 [id. Z.L. IMI 343 121]
nidulans (see Emericella nidulans)
nidulans var. echinulatus (see Eurotium echinulata)
nidulans var. latus (see Emericella nidulans)
niger (see A. niger var. niger)
niger var. ficuum (Reichardt) Kozak.
= ficuum (Reichardt) Henn.
Allium cepa: PPRI 3389 [PREM 49173], 3390 [PREM 49174],
3391 [PREM 49170], 3424 [PREM 49171], 3425
[PREM 49172]
compost: PPRI 3476 [PREM 49338]
grass endophyte: De Villiers (1989) [PPRI 3455, PREM 49280]
sand/soil: PPRI 3321 [PREM 49203], 3322 [PREM 49200],
3323 [PREM 49204, id. as A. niger Z.L. IMI 343 118]
niger Tiegh. var. niger
= niger Tiegh.
aerospora: Doidge (1950); Roth (1968)
Allium cepa: VdB 95 [Verwoerd (1929), Doidge (1950),
Doidge et al. (1953); Gorter (1977)]; PPRI 3253
[PREM 49169]; PPRI 5017
Allium sativum: PPRI 3388 [PREM 47499, ver. Z. L. IMI 343
119]
antigen of; Benatar et al. (1980)
Arachis hypogaea: Doidge (1950) [Doidge et al. (1953),
Gorter (1977)]; Marasas & Van Rensburg (1986)
Avena sativa: *Liibben (1992)
Avicennia marina: Steinke (1990)
banana: Roth & Loest (1965)
Bmguiera gymnorrhiza: Steinke (1990)
Cenchrus ciliaris: Bezuidenhout (1977)
cereals and legume products: Scott (1965)
citrus fruits: Doidge & Van der Plank (1936)
Citrus limonia: Doidge (1950)
Citnts sinensis: Doidge (1950) [Doidge et al. (1953), Gorter
(1977)]
compost: Eicker (1980); Smit (1984)
contaminant on malt agar: PREM 25960
cowpea hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
182
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
dairy: Davel & Neethling (1930)
debris: PREM 48974, 48982, 49202
dried sausage: *PREM 45524, *45525
flannel bag: Doidge (1950) (TRL)
fodder: PPRI 3618 [PREM 48029]
fruit (rotting): Doidge (1950); [Doidge et al. (1953)]
Gardenia fruits: Doidge (1950) [PREM 23647]
grapes: Le Roux (1973)
grass hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
groundnut hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
insect (dead Chrysomelidae sp.): PPRI 4966
leather (wet-blue): Russell (1981) |PPRI 3255]
Litchi chinensis : Roth (1963)
lucerne hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
Lycopersicum esculentum: Doidge et al. (1953)
maize meal/hay/silage: Van Warmelo (1967)
man: Doidge (1950); Martin & Berson (1973); Bak & Wagen-
feld (1983); Berkowitz & Jacobs (1987)
Mangifera indica : Doidge (1950)
mango: Wehner et al. (1981)
material: Doidge (1950)
Medicago sativa seed: Marasas & Bredell (1973)
Medicago spp.: Lamprecht et al. (1988) [PPRI 3739, PREM
48327]
molasses meal: Roth (1968)
nuts/dried fruit: *Wehner & Rabie (1970)
paper: PPRI 3640 [PREM 49877]
paper pulp: Smit (1984)
pasture: Roux (1985)
peanut butter/ meal/ kernels: Gilman (1972)
phylloplane: Eicker (1976)
pomegranate (Punica granatum ): Verwoerd (1929)
Pyrus malus: Doidge (1950)
soil: Allsopp et al. (1987) [UCT]; Botha & Wehner (1990);
Cohen (1950); Eicker (1974); Martin (1960); Rosselet
(1953, 1955); Weideman et al. (1990); PPRI 3328;
CSIR 170, 171, 172, 173; MCP 1012
sorghum malt: Rabie & Liibben (1984)
sugar: Van der Bijl (1920) [VdB 905, PREM 14260]
Triticum aestivum: Liibben (1992)
ventilation tubing: Doidge (1950) (TRL det. Thom)
Vitis vinifera : Doidge (1950) [Doidge et al. (1953), Gorter
(1977]
Welwitschia mirabilis: Bomman (1978); PREM 36987, 41961,
43736; CBS 139.54
Ximenia americana : PREM 5599
Zea mays : Doidge (1950); Gilman (1972); Marasas & Van
Rensburg (1986); McLean & Berjak (1987); Van der
Westhuizen & Bredell (1972); Van Warmelo et al.
(1968); PREM 47914; CSIR 56, 156, 334, 513, 550.
559, 628
= welwitschiae (Bres.) Hennings
Welwitschia bainesii: Doidge (1950) [VdB 2499]; Raper & Fen-
nell (1973); PREM^ 46296
niger var. tubengensis (Mosseray) Kozak.
= tubengensis Mosseray
compost: Eicker (1980)
debris: PREM 48979, 48981
soil: Eicker (1969, 1970) [PREM 44288]
sugar cane cariopsis: PREM 47531
Zea mays: PREM 47554, 48864
niveus (see FenneUia nivea)
nutans McLennan & Ducker
soil: Raper & Fennell (1973) [CBS 122.56]; UCT [PPRI 3227]
ochraceus K. Wilh.
Asclepias stem: PPRI 3764
Andropogon sorghum seed: *CSIR 806 [CBS 263.67]
Avicennia seed: PREM 47524, 47525
cereals and legume products: *Scott (1965)
Citrus limonia : Doidge et al. (1953)
contaminant on malt agar: PREM 25961
fodder: PPRI 4687
lucerne hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
Medicago sativa seed: Marasas & Bredell (1973) [PREM 44359]
peanut butter/meal/kemels: Gilman (1972)
soil: Eicker (1974, 1975); Eicker et al. (1982); Martin (1960); Papen-
dorf (1976) |MCP 337, 1013]; CSIR 101, 102, 140, 142, 144,
153, 154, 157, 161, 162, 163, 164, 167, 168, 169, 490, 516,
551
sorghum: *Van der Merwe et al. (1965b); CSIR 289, 291, 803, 804
Triticum aestivum : Liibben (1992) >•
unknown host: *Van der Merwe et al. ( 1965a, b); *IMI 132 429
Zea mays : Gilman (1972); McLean & Berjak (1987); Van der West-
huizen & Bredell (1972); Van Warmelo et al. (1968); PPRI
3854 [PREM 47920], 3855 [PREM 47534]; CSIR 60; MCP
[PPRI 3865]
omatus (see Sclerocleista ornata)
oryzae (Ahlb.) Cohn
cassava: Klich & Pitt (1988)
cattle pellets: PREM 47142
cereal and legume products: Scott (1965)
grass roots: PPRI 3151
manure: PPRI 3474 [PREM 49334]
Zea mays: Mycock & Beijak (1992); PPRI 3629 [PREM 47624];
PREM 47625, 47926
= effusus Tirab.
cereals and legume products: Scott (1965)
ostianus Wehmer
sorghum: CSIR 290
parasiticus Speare
aerospora: Doidge (1950)
agricultural commodities: Dutton & Westlake (1985)
Arena sativa: Liibben (1992)
com: Klich & Pitt (1988)
groundnut seed: Labuschagne & Wehner (1990)
insect (dead Chrysomelidae sp.): PPRI 5063
locust (Locustana pardalina): Prinsloo (1960)
man: Martin & Berson (1973)
Medicago spp. Lamprecht et al. (1988) [PREM 48325]
oats: Klich & Pitt (1988)
paper: PPRI 3641 [PREM 49873]
soil: Klich & Pitt (1988); CSIR 214
sunflower seed: Klich & Pitt (1988)
termites (dead Hodotennes mossambicus): PPRI 3754
Zea mays: Klich & Pitt (1988); CSIR 62
penicilloides Speg.
Arachis hypogaea: CBS 234.65
phoenicis (Corda) Thom
Welwitschia sp. inflorescence: PPRI 4110 (ver. Z.L.), 4111; IMI 056
824
proliferans G. Sm.
= sartoryi Syd.
gold mine: Thom & Church (1926), type of A. sartoryi
[Doidge 1950]
puniceus Kwon-Chung & Fennell
Cenchms ciliaris: Bezuidenhout (1977)
soil: Papendorf (1976) [MCP 46, 174, 236]
quadrilineatus (see Emericella quadrilineata)
quercinus (see A. melleus)
repens (see Eurotium repens)
restrictus G. Sm.
cereals and legume products: Scott (1965)
soil: CSIR 39, 40, 42
Zea mays: Van der Westhuizen & Bredell (1972); PPRI 4841
ruber (see Eurotium rubrum)
mgulosus (see Emericella rugulosa)
sartoryi (see A. proliferans)
sclerotiorum G.A. Huber
grass litter: PPRI 3678
insects (dead Chrysomelidae spp.): PPRI 5061
paper: PPRI 3304 (PREM 49209)
termites (dead Hodotennes mossambicus): PPRI 3305 [PREM 49205]
sparsus Raper & Thom
soil: PPRI 4082 [PREM 50863 ver. Z. L. IMI 344 491]
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
183
stromatoides (see Chaetosartorya stromatoides)
subsessilis Raper & Fennell
compost: PPRI 4016 (id, Z.L. IMI 343 123)
sulphureus (Fresen.) Wehmer
Nicotiana tabacum: Doidge (1950)
sydowii (Bainier & Sartory) Thom & Church
cereals and legume products: Scott (1965)
compost: Eicker (1980)
grass hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
lucerne hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
maize silage: Van Warmelo (1967)
man: Martin & Berson (1973)
Medicago sativa seed: Marasas & Bredell (1973) [PREM 44470,
44471, 44481]
Melianthus comosus seed: PPRI 3810 [PREM 50888]
oats: Doidge (1950)
silage: CBS 170.63
soil: Eicker (1974); CS1R 122, 123, 124, 125, 126; UCT
sugar: Doidge (1950)
Watsonia marginata seed: PPRI 3839
Zea mays: Gilman (1972); Mycock & Beijak (1992); Van der West-
huizen & Bredell (1972); PREM 47555; CSIR 59
tamarii Kita
cereals and legume products: Scott (1965)
debris: PPRI 4018 [PREM 49064, ver. Z.L.]
dried beans: Klich & Pitt (1988)
peanut butter/meal/kemels: Gilman (1972)
soil: PPRI 4018; CSIR 127, 128, 129, 130, 131
sorghum grain: Bosman et al. (1991); CSIR 313
sunflower seed: Klich & Pitt (1988)
Zea mays'. Gilman (1972); PREM 47922
terreus Thom
aerospora: Roth (1965)
Avena sativa: *Liibben (1992)
Cenchms ciliaris: Bezuidenhout (1977)
cereals and legume products: Scott (1965)
debris: PPRI 3182, [PREM 49036]; PREM 48978, 48980
fishmoth gut ( Namibmormisma muricauda ): Watson et al. (1990) [PPRI
3614]
grass roots: PPRI 3613 [PREM 48975]; PREM 48976, 48978, 48980
groundnut seeds: Van Warmelo (1967)
leather (wet-blue): Russell (1981)
lucerne hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
maize meal/hay/silage: Van Warmelo (1967)
man: Martin & Berson (1973)
Melianthus comosus seed: PPRI 3615
natural gum: Roth (1968)
pasture: Roux (1985)
sclerotia ( Sclerotinia sclerotiorum ): PREM 47927
soil: Eicker et al. (1982); Weideman et al. (1990): PPRI 3180 [PREM
49037], 3613; CSIR 174, 175, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187,
188, 189, 190, 191
sorghum: CSIR 307, 309
sorghum malt: Rabie & Liibben (1984)
straw: PPRI 3480 [PREM 49333]
sugar: Van der Bijl (1920) [VdB 904, Doidge (1950), PREM 14261]
Triticum aestivum : Liibben (1992)
Zea mays: Gilman (1972); McLean & Berjak (1987); Van der West-
huizen & Bredell (1972); Van Warmelo et al. (1968); PREM
47915, 47916, 47917, 47918, 47919; CSIR 159, 536, 539, 616
= terreus var. boedijni (Blochwitz) Thom & Raper
soil: CSIR 177, 178
= terreus var. floccosus Thom & Raper
soil: CSIR 175
terreus var. aureus Thom & Raper
compost: Eicker (1980)
millet seed: PPRI 4229 [PREM 50864]
terreus var. boedijni (see A. terreus)
terreus var. floccosus (see A. terreus)
terricola E.I. Marchal
Watsonia marginata seed: PPRI 3788
Zea mays: PREM 47551
tubengensis (see A. niger var. tubengensis)
umbrosus (see Eurotium herbariorum)
unilateralis Thrower
Hakea sericea roots: Allsopp et al. (1987)
Leucospemium parile roots: Allsopp et al. (1987)
soil: Allsopp et al. (1987)
ustus (Bainier) Thom & Church
aerospora: Roth (1968)
Arachis hypogctea: PPRI 3189 [PREM 49027]
Avena sativa: *Lubben (1992)
canvas ventilation tubing: IMI 089 359
Cenchrus ciliaris: Bezuidenhout (1977)
cereals and legume products: Scott (1965)
cheese: Luck et al. (1976); Luck & Wehner (1979)
compost: Eicker (1980)
culture contaminant: Rabie et al. (1977)
debris: PPRI 3198 [PREM 49063], 3199, 3639
flannel bag: IMI 089 360
grass endophyte: De Villiers (1989) [PPRI 3456, PREM 49281]
grass roots: PREM 49063
insect (dead Chrysomelidae sp.): PPRI 3191 [PREM 49051], 3192
[PREM 49052], 3193 [PREM 49053]
lucerne hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
maize hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
Medicago sativa seed: PREM 44553
natural gum: Roth (1968)
soil: Eicker (1974, 1975); CSIR 117, 118, 119, 120, 121
sorghum malt: Rabie & Liibben (1984)
Zea mays: Van der Westhuizen & Bredell (1972); CSIR 8
= minutus E.V. Abbott
flannel bag: Doidge (1950) (TRL det. Thom)
variecolor (see Emericella variecolor)
versicolor (Vuill.) Tirab.
Avena sativa: *Liibben (1992)
canvas: Doidge (1950) (TRL det. Thom)
Cenchrus ciliaris: Bezuidenhout (1977)
cereals and legume products: Scott (1965)
flannel bag: Doidge (1950) (TRL det. Thom)
grapes: Le Roux et al. (1972)
Leucospemium parile roots: Allsopp et al. (1987)
lucerne hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
man: Doidge (1950): Martin & Berson (1973)
Medicago sativa seed: Marasas & Bredell (1973) [PREM 44486]
Medicago spp.: Lamprecht et al. (1988) (PPRI 3502, PREM 48326]
paper: PPRI 3315 [PREM 49208]
peanut butter/meal/kemels: Gilman (1972)
Salvia stenophylla seed: PPRI 3519
soil: Martin (1960); Eicker (1974, 1975): Papendorf (1976) [MCP 339];
CSIR 179, 192, 193, 194, 196, 197, 198, 199, 201, 202; UCT
sorghum malt: Rabie & Liibben (1984)
undetermined host: Rabie et al. (1976); CSIR: 1365, 1367, 1370
wooden floor boards: PPRI 3890
Triticum aestivum: Liibben (1992)
Zea mays: Van Warmelo et al. (1968); Gilman (1972); McLean &
Beijak (1985, 1987); Van der Westhuizen & Bredell (1972);
PREM 47626, 47923; CSIR 478
viridinutans Ducker & Thrower
grass debris: PPRI 3327 |PREM 49206]
grass roots: PPRI 3208 [PREM 49067], 3209 [PREM 49068]
soil: PPRI 4976
welwitschiae (see A. niger var. niger)
wentii Wehmer
Avena sativa: Liibben (1992)
cereals and legume products: Scott (1965) [Rabie & Terblanche (1967)]
compost: Smit (1984)
groundnuts: *Rabie et al. (1965)
palm seed (Arega catechu): PREM 49026
peanut butter/meal/kemels: Gilman (1972)
soil: Eicker (1974); Weideman et al. (1990); CSIR 244, 245, 246, 247,
248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 254
sorghum: CSIR: 294, 295
sorghum malt: Rabie & Liibben (1984); *Rabie et al. (1986)
sugar cane cariopsis: PREM 47527
unknown host: Rabie & Terblanche (1967)
184
Bothalia 24,2 ( 1994)
Zea mays: Gilman (1972); McLean & Beijak (1987); Van der Wes-
thuizen & Bredell (1972); Van Warmelo et al. (1968); PPR1
3905; CS1R 155, 336, 357, 376, 418, 431; IMI 162 039
Aspergillus species undetermined
aerospora: Ordman (1963, 1970); Ordman & Etter (1956);
Potter et al. (1991); Van der Merwe et al. (1979)
agricultural commodities: Dutton & Westlake (1985)
Allium cepa: PREM 46375
Arachis hypogaea : Marasas & Van Rensburg (1986)
Avicennia marina: Mycock & Beijak (1990); Steinke et al. (1990)
banana: Roth & Loest (1965)
beer: Martin & Keen (1978)
Bruguiera gymnorrhiza : Steinke et al. (1990)
Camellia sinensis: Mycock & Berjak (1990)
Castanospermum australe: Mycock & Beijak (1990)
cereal and legume products: Isaacson (1966)
cheese: Luck & Wehner (1979)
chicken feeds and litter: Westlake & Dutton (1985)
Cichorium intybus: Prinsloo et al. (1991)
citrus fruits: Doidge & Van der Plank ( 1936)
Citrus sinensis: Doidge (1950) [Doidge et al. (1953)]
compost: Eicker (1980); Smit (1984)
corn: Marasas et al. (1981); Van Warmelo (1967)
cowpea hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
feedstuffs: Dutton & Westlake (1985); Van Warmelo (1967)
Ficus carica: Doidge (1950) [Doidge et al. (1953)]
grapes: Le Roux et al. (1973)
grass hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
groundnut hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
groundnuts: Marasas & Van Rensburg (1986)
indigenous seed: Isaacs & Benic (1990)
Landolphia kirkii: Mycock & Beijak (1990)
Lite hi chinensis: Mycock & Berjak (1990)
lucerne hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
man: Martin & Berson (1973); Cooper et al. (1983);
Fitzsimons & Peters (1986); Glass et al. (1984)
oranges: Doidge & Van der Plank (1936)
Passiflora quadrangularis: Doidge (1950)
pasture: Roux (1985)
piglet: Nesbit (1986)
Pinus sp.: Lundquist (1987)
Podocarpus henkelii: Mycock & Beijak (1990)
Prunus persica: Doidge et al. (1953)
Pyrus malus: Doidge et al. (1950)
Saccharum officinarum: Doidge (1950) [Doidge et al. (1953)]
scale: PREM 26137, 28447
Scadoxus membranaceus: Mycock & Berjak ( 1 990)
soil: Eicker (1974, 1975); Eicker et al. (1982); Papendorf (1976)
sorghum grain: Bosman et al. (1991)
spent sulphite liquor: Pretorius & Lempert (1993a, b, c)
sunflower hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
swine meal: Van Warmelo (1967)
Zea mays: Gilman (1972); Marasas & Van Rensburg (1986); Rheeder
et al. (1990); PREM 47913
GENUS CHAETOSARTORYA
cremea (Kwon-Chung & Fennell) Subram.
# A. cremeus Kwon & Fennell
Zea mays: Van der Westhuizen & Bredell (1972)
stromatoides B.J. Wiley & E.G. Simmons
# A. stromatoides Raper & Fennell
man: Sacho et al. (1987) [IMI 292 883)]
GENUS EMERICELLA
acristata (Fennell & Raper) Y. Horie
celery seed: PPRI 4961
echinulata (Fennell & Raper) Y. Horie
compost: PPRI 3465
# A. nidulans var. echinulalus Fennell & Raper
culture contaminant: PREM 48909
nidulans (Eidam) Vuill.
compost: PPRI 3466, 3467
# A. nidulans (Eidam) Wint.
aerospora: Roth (1968) >
Avena sativa: *Lubben (1992)
Cenchrus ciliaris: Bezuidenhout (1977)
cereals and legume products: *Scott ( 1965)
compost: Eicker ( 1 980)
grass hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
groundnuts: *Holzapfel et al. (1966); Van Warmelo (1967)
litter: Eicker (1976)
lucerne hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
lupin seeds: Van Warmelo (1967)
maize hay/silage: Van Warmelo (1967)
Medicago sativa seed: PREM 44520, 44532
molasses meal: Roth (1968)
natural gum: Roth (1968)
pasture: Roux (1985)
soil: Eicker (1974, 1975); Eicker et al. (1982); CSIR 103, 104, 105,
106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 997, 998
sorghum malt: Rabie & Liibben (1984)
Triticum aestivum: Liibben (1992)
Zea mays: *Holzapfel et al. (1966); Van der Westhuizen & Bredell
(1972); Van Warmelo et al. (1968); CSIR 835
# A. nidulans var. latus Thom & Raper
air-sac of penguin: CSIR 999
compost: Eicker (1980)
quadrilineata (Thom & Raper) C.R. Benj.
Arachis hypogaea: *CBS 235.65
compost: PPRI 3468
# A. quadrilineatus Thom & Raper
Medicago sativa seed: PREM 44514, 44515
Pisum sativum: PREM 44326
soil: CSIR 1000
sorghum: CSIR 295
rugulosa (Thom & Raper) C.R. Benj.
straw: PPRI 3469
# A. rugulosus Thom & Raper
Avena sativa: *Liibben (1992)
compost: Eicker (1980)
Pisum sativum: PREM 44327
soil: Eicker (1974, 1975)
variecolor Berk. & Broome
# A. variecolor (Berk. & Broom) Thom & Raper
Zea mays: Van der Westhuizen & Bredell (1972)
violacea (Fennell & Raper) Malloch & Cain
forest soil: CBS 314.89
GENUS EUROTIUM
amstelodami L. Mangin
aerospora: PPRI 4851
contaminant: PPRI 3429
lupin: PPRI 3720 [PREM 50889]
Melianthus comosus seed: PPRI 3869
Zea mays: PPRI 3836
# A. amstelodami (L. Mangin) Thom & Church
Arachis hypogaea: PREM 48049
cereals and legume products: Scott (1965)
grass hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
groundnut seeds: Van Warmelo (1967)
Litchi chinensis: Roth (1963)
lucerne hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
lupin seeds: Van Warmelo (1967)
mangrove soil: Swart (1959)
Medicago sativa seed: Marasas & Bredell (1973); PREM 44494,
44496
mine timber: Doidge (1950) |TRL det. Thom]
soil: CSIR 19, 20, 25, 28, 29, 31, 32, 36, 38
sugar: Doidge (1950)
swine meal: Van Warmelo (1967)
Triticum aestivum: Liibben (1992)
unknown substrate: *Rabie et al. ( 1964); Swart (1959); PREM 48049
Zea mays: Van der Westhuizen & Bredell (1972); CSIR 137, 841,
863
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
185
chevalieri L. Mangin
Zea mays'. PPRI 3847 [PREM 49437], 4908
# A. chevalieri (Mangin) Thom & Church
cereals and legume products: *Scott (1965)
compost: Eicker (1980)
soil: CS1R 52, 53, 54, 64, 65, 67, 78, 79, 82
Triticum aestivum : Liibben (1992)
unknown substrate: Swart (1959)
Zea mays'. Gilman (1972); Mycock & Berjak (1992); Van der West-
huizen & Bredell (1972); PREM 47921, 47924, 47925; CSIR
143
cristatum (Raper & Fennell) Malloch & Cain
horse feed: PPRI 4973
# -4. chevalieri var. intermedius Thom & Raper
soil: CSIR 975, 976
# A. cristalus Raper & Fennell
unknown substrate: Raper & Fennell (1973), type of A.
cristatus [CBS 123 53, IMI 172 278]
Zea mays: PREM 44574, 44575
echinulatum Delacr,
#A. echinulatus (Delacr.) Thom & Church
Zea mays: Gilman (1972); Van der Westhuizen & Bredell (1972)
herbariorum Link
Melianthus comosus seed: PPRI 3582
Pisum sativum seed: CBS 127 55
# A. glaucus Link
aerospora: Roth (1968)
Abrus precatorius seed: PREM 23617
Avena sativa: Liibben (1992)
Caryopemon cruciger: Doidge (1950) [PREM 23618]
Cenchrus ciliaris: Bezuidenhout (1977)
cheese: Doidge (1950)
contaminant on malt agar: PREM 25959 [id. CBS]
dairy: Davel & Neethling (1930)
Medicago sativa seed: PREM 44364
molasses meal: Roth (1968)
Nicotiana tabacum: Doidge (1950) [PREM 701]
nuts (Corylus avellana): PREM 23649
sorghum malt: Rabie & Liibben (1984)
sugar: VdB 902
Triticum aestivum: Liibben (1992)
unknown substrate: Doidge (1950)
Zea mays: McLean & Berjak (1985, 1987); Van Warmelo et al.
(1968); PREM 47529, 47535
# A. mangini Thom & Raper
cereals and legume products: *Scott (1965)
herbarium material: Swart (1959)
mangrove soil: Swart (1959)
soil: CSIR 45
= Eurotium umbrosum (Bainier & Sartory) Malloch & Cain.
Arachis hypogaea: CBS 232.65
# A. umbrosus Bainier & Sartory
Medicago sativa seed: Marasas & Bredell (1973)
soil: CSIR 43, 44, 46, 47
Zea mays: Van der Westhuizen & Bredell (1972); PREM 44570,
44576
repens De Bary
Cussonia paniculata seed: PPRI 3666
kiwi jam: PREM 47738
Melianthus comosus seed: PPRI 3665 [PREM 49891]
# A. repens (De Bary) Fischer
aerospora: Doidge (1950)
cereals and legume products: Scott (1965)
compost: Eicker (1980)
culture contaminant: Swart (1959)
dried sausage: *PREM 47101
peas: Swart ( 1959)
soil: CSIR 48, 50; MCP 1014
sorghum: CSIR 535, 537, 540
sugar: VdB 901
Triticum aestivum: Liibben (1992)
Zea mays: Gilman (1972); Van der Westhuizen & Bredell (1972)
rubrum J. Konig el al.
contaminant: PPRI 3609
# A. ruber (J. Konig et al.) Thom & Church
cereals and legume products: *Scott (1965)
compost: Eicker (1980)
Nicotiana tabacum: IMI 168 779
soil: CSIR 6, 7, 12, 21, 26, 27, 74
Triticum aestivum: Liibben (1992)
Zea mays: Gilman (1972); Van der Westhuizen & Bredell (1972);
CSIR 308, PREM 47534
GENUS FENNELLIA
flavipes B.J. Wiley & E.G. Simmons
# A. flavipes (Bainier & Sartory) Thom & Church
Cenchrus ciliaris: Bezuidenhout (1977)
cereals and legume products: *Scott (1965)
debris: PREM 48977
insect (dead Chrysomelidae sp.): PPRI 4965
Leucospermum parile roots: Allsopp et al. (1987)
soil: Martin (1960); Eicker (1974); PPRI 3181 [PREM 50865], 4226;
CSIR 134 [PREM 48046], 135; UCT
sorghum: CSIR 804
Zea mays: Van der Westhuizen & Bredell (1972); CSIR 1085 |PREM
48047]; PREM 48055
nivea (B.J. Wiley & E.G. Simmons) Samson
# A. niveus Blochwitz
cereals and legume products: *Scott (1965)
grass hay: Van Warmelo (1967)
soil: CSIR 132; IMI 161 651; UCT
# A. ebumeus Biourge
timber: Doidge (1950)
GENUS NEOSARTORYA
aurata (Warcup) Malloch & Cain
= Sartoiya aurata (Warcup) Subram.
soil: CSIR 977, 978 |PPRI 3418. PREM 49322, id. Z. L. IMI
343 120], 979. 980 [PPRI 3419], 981
fischeri (Wehmer) Malloch & Cain
face cream: PPRI 4230 [PREM 50867]
Leucospermum parile roots: Allsopp et al. (1987)
# A. fischeri Wehmer
litter: Eicker (1973)
peat: Smit (1984)
soil: Cohen (1950); Eicker (1969); CSIR 988, 996, 1050 [PPRI 3195,
PREM 49038]; PPRI 4975; IMI 332 643; CBS 317.89; UCT
glabra (Fennell & Raper) Kozak,
soil: UCT [PPRI 3247. PREM 49193]
# A. fischeri var. glaber Fennell & Raper
soil: CSIR 991, 992 [PPRI 3427, PREM 49319], 993
spinosa (Raper & Fennell) Kozak,
sterilised compost: PREM 47727
# A. fischeri var. spinosus Raper & Fennell
soil: CSIR 990 [PPRI 3428, PREM 49320]; IMI 332643
stramenia (R. Novak & Raper) Malloch & Cain
= Sartorya stramenia (Novak & Raper) Subram.
soil: CSIR 982, 983. 984, 985, 986
GENUS SARTORYA (see genus NEOSARTORYA)
GENUS SCLEROCLEISTA
ornata (Raper et al.) Subram.
= A. omatus Raper et al.
Zea mays: Gilman (1972)
Botha] ia 24,2: 187-194(1994)
The taxonomic value of epidermal characters in the leaf of Heteromorpha and
some related genera (Apiaceae)
P.J.D. WINTER* and B-E. VAN WYK*
Keywords: Apiaceae, epidermis, Heteromorpha , Polemannia, Polemanrtiopsis, stomata, taxonomy, trichomes, vestiture
ABSTRACT
All 17 species of Heteromorpha Cham. & Schltdl. (sensu Humbert 1956), all three species of Polemannia Eckl. & Zeyh. and
the monotypic Polemanniopsis B.L. Burtt were investigated for leaf epidermal characters. Stomatal type was anomocytic, with
an exception in only one Madagascar species, H. betsileensis. The distribution and density of stomata (on both leaf surfaces) are
diagnostic for some species. The number, size and outline of normal epidermal cells are different in juvenile and adult leaves
and these differences vary between species. Seven trichome types are recognized which, when combined with dispersion
pattern, also serve to characterise the various species and forms.
UITTREKSEL
A] 17 spesies van Heteromorpha Cham. & Schltdl. (sensu Humbert 1956), al drie spesies van Polemannia Eckl. & Zeyh. en
die monotipiese Polemanniopsis B.L. Burtt se blaar-epidermale kenmerke is ondersoek. Die stomata-tipe was anomosities, met
'n enkele uitsondering by een Madagassiese spesie, H. betsileensis. Die verspreiding en digtheid van stomata (op beide
oppervlakke) is diagnostics vir sommige spesies. Die aantal, grootte en buitelyn van gewone epidermisselle verskil by jeug- en
volwasse blare en hierdie verskille varieer tussen spesies. Sewe trigoomtipes word onderskei wat, saam met
verspreidingspatroon, kenmerkend is vir die verskillende spesies en vorme.
INTRODUCTION
Heteromorpha Cham. & Schltdl. ( sensu stricto) is a
genus of trees, shrubs or suffrutices occurring throughout
most of temperate and subtropical Africa. Seven species
are restricted to the African continent and Yemen. Hum-
bert (1956) broadened the generic concept to include eight
Madagascar species. The African contingent shares the
woody habit with the related Polemannia Eckl. & Zeyh.
from the Drakensberg region, and fruit characters with the
Western and Northern Cape genus Polemanniopsis B.L.
Burtt (Burtt 1988), which have been included here as
potential outgroups.
Most species are either glabrous or have trichomes
which are not readily visible to the naked eye. Phenotypic
variation as well as the broad species concepts employed
in past surveys (mostly Flora treatments and therefore of
a limited, regional nature), have tended to obscure the
taxonomic relevance of vestiture. However, trichome type
and trichome distribution have been used to distinguish
H. trifoliata from species with basally tuberculate
trichomes, and to characterise H. papillosa and H. goss-
weileri (Townsend 1985, 1989). Epidermal characters are
therefore clearly of taxonomic value in Heteromorpha ,
especially when the paucity of information on other char-
acters is considered.
Stomatal type has been recorded for only one of the
woody African Apiaceae, namely H. arborescens , which
was found to be anomocytic (Guyot 1971).
* Department of Botany, Rand Afrikaans University, RO. Box 524,
Auckland Park 2006, Johannesburg.
MS. received: 1993-02-09.
This investigation forms part of a complete revision of
the genus Heteromorpha. The formal taxonomic treatment
will be published elsewhere.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Leaves from FAA material or from herbarium
specimens of all known species of Heteromorpha sensu
lato (including the Madagascan group), as well as the re-
lated genera Polemannia and Polemanniopsis , were
treated according to the method described by Ram & Nyar
(1974) to obtain epidermal peels of both leaf surfaces.
Specimens examined:
Heteromorpha (African species)
1A involucrata Conrath, typical form, sufffutex, Transvaal, Swaziland
& Natal, Winter 61. 68 (JRAU); Gerstner 3763 (PRE).
IB involucrata Conrath, ‘kassneri' form, sufffutex, Malawi & Zam-
bia, Quarre 5919 (PRE); Phillips 1295 (MO).
1C involucrata Conrath, ‘Zimbabwe’ form, sufffutex or weak shrub,
Zimbabwe & Angola, Jacobsen 2891 (PRE): Bayliss 10686 (PRE); Kers
3491 (S).
ID involucrata Conrath, ‘Malawi’ form, weak shrub, Malawi & SA,
Torre & Paiva 11897 (PRE); Winter 67 (JRAU).
2 pubescens Burtt Davy, suffrutex or weak shrub, Transvaal, Winter
66. 69 (JRAU); Junod 143 (PRE).
3 papillosa C.C. Towns., well-branched shrub, Namibia, Merxmiiller
& Giess 28004 (PRE); Dinter 3499 (PRE); Hanekom 135 (WIN).
4 gossweileti (Norman) Norman, suffrutex, Angola, Milne-Redhead
3981 (PRE); Mendes 2069 (PRE); Hundt 727 (PRE); Hooper &
Townsend 325 (K).
5 stenophylla Wolff ex Schinz, sufffutex, Namibia, Angola & Malawi,
Le Roux 295 (PRE); Giess 8602 (PRE); Dinter 5487 (PRE).
188
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
6A arborescens (Spreng.) Cham. & Schltdl., tree, Cape, Van Wyk
3313 (JRAU); Vlok 2633 (JRAU); Ward 7538 (PRE).
6B trifoliata (Wendl.) Eckl. & Zeyh., typical form, tree, Eastern Cape
to Arabian Peninsula, Brink 128 (PRE); Winter 71 (JRAU); De Wilde
6041 (K); Semsei 4122 (PRE); Stolz 24699 (PRE); Pope & Muller 2075
(PRE).
6C trifoliata (Wendl.) Eckl. & Zeyh., frutescent form, shrub. Natal
to Malawi, Winter 51, 57 (JRAU); Rogers 22197 (PRE).
6D trifoliata (Wendl.) Eckl. & Zeyh., W African form, suffrutex,
Letouzey 5680 (K); Meurillon 1396 (K); Milne-Redhead 762 (K).
7 transvaalensis Schltr. & Wolff, suffrutex. Winter 50, 52, 55 (JRAU).
Heteromorpha (Madagascan species)
Ml laxiflora (Baker) Humb. var. alticola Humb., suffrutescent climb-
er, De la Bdthie 15168 (P); Humbert & Capuron 25031 (P); var. laxiflora ,
climber, Schatz 2655 (MO).
M2 marojejyensis Humb., thin-stemmed shrub, Humbert 22710 (P);
Miller & Lowry 4160 (MO); Herbier de 1'Alaotra 3475 (MO).
M3 tsaratananensis Humb., woody shrub, De la Bdthie 6806, 16411
(P); Humbert 18374 (P).
M4 coursii (Baker) Humb., woody shrublet, Humbert et al. 24702
(P); Herbier de 1'Alaotra 3825 (MO).
M5 betsileensis Humb., suffrutex, Humbert 3792 (P); De la Bdthie
6815 (P).
M6 andringitrensis Humb., herbaceous perennial, De la Bdthie 6809,
13741, 14430 (P).
M7 andohahelensis Humb., suffrutex, Humbert 6192, 6466, 13654 (P).
M8 bojeriana (Baker) Humb., suffrutex, Bojer s.n. (P); Dorr et al.
2889 (MO); Catat 332 (P).
Polemanniopsis (woody shrubs, NW Cape)
PO marlothii (Wolff) B.L. Burtt, Venter 8132 (PRE); Taylor 11384
(PRE); Van Jaarsveld 5457 (PRE).
Polemannia (woody shrubs, Drakensberg)
PI montana Schlecht. & Wolff, Smook 7181 (PRE); Schmitz 9077
(PRE); Jacobs 3097 (PRE).
P2 simplicior Hilliard & B.L. Burtt, Hoever 2016 (PRE); Pole Evans
19654H (PRE); Pentz sub PRE 48118 (PRE).
P3 gross ulariifolia Eckl. & Zeyh., Ratray 35 (PRE); Giffen 1296
(PRE); Gal pin 8359 (PRE).
Mean stomata] densities were determined under the
light microscope, by a minimum of six counts per
specimen over an area along the eyepiece scale bar.
Counts were not taken directly adjacent to the margin or
midvein, only in the secondary vein interstices. Dispersion
was scored according to patterns of local presence or con-
centration.
After germinating seeds of five African species | H. ar-
borescens, H. trifoliata, H. involucrata, //. pubescens and
H. transvaalensis ], juvenile leaves were available to in-
vestigate ontogenetic changes during leaf development.
Trichome types were studied by SEM on one specimen
of each taxon. To investigate the structure of each
trichome type, mature leaves were embedded in glycol
methacrylate (GMA) according to a modification (Tilney
1986) of the method of Feder & O’Brien ( 1968). Sections
were obtained with a Porter Blum MT-I ultramicrotome
and stained according to the so-called periodic acid —
Schiff/Toluidine Blue (PAS/TB) staining method. Draw-
ings were done with the aid of a camera lucida attachment
on a Zeiss compound light microscope. Vestiture
(trichome distribution) was studied on several specimens
with the aid of a dissecting stereomicroscope. The inves-
tigation was limited to the laminar region of the leaf.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Five characters were chosen for analysis:
Stomata I apparatus
The stomatal apparatus proved difficult to interpret be-
cause cell boundaries were indistinct in the stomal region
and because cells adjacent to the stomata differed super-
ficially from the surrounding epidermal cells. The cuticula
appears to be much thicker in this region, making the
radial cell walls and guard cell boundary almost indiscer-
nible. This at first suggested a tetracytic or actinocytic
arrangement, but the number of surrounding cells was too
inconsistent for this to be the case. Stomata are juxtaposed
FIGURE 1 . — Stomatal apparatus types in Heteromorpha. A, H. betsi-
leensis'. anisocytic type. B. II. coursii: anomocytic type.
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
189
in some instances, or separated by one cell only (Figure
IB), confirming the perigenous anomocytic origin. Cells
surrounding the stomata sometimes differ from other
epidermal cells in their reaction to staining, but there is
no evidence of any structural difference, hence our inter-
pretation that these are not true subsidiary cells.
As found by Guyot (1971) for H. arborescens, the rest
of the genus — with one exception — as well as the related
genera, all possess the anomocytic type stomatal apparatus
(Figure IB). The stomata of the Apiaceae are generally
considered to be more or less intermediate between
anomocytic and anisocytic (Guyot 1971; Ostroumova
1987 in Baranova 1992).
The single exception, the Madagascan species H. bet-
sileensis , has an anisocytic type stomatal apparatus (Fig-
ure 1A). The radial cell walls of subsidiary cells are
shorter than the tangential walls, giving them a thinner
shape than the normal epidermal cells. The characteristic
clustering of the stoma with three surrounding cells sug-
gests a common origin from one stomatal initial cell
(mesogenous type), although it must be emphasized that
the ontogeny was not studied (see Baranova 1992 for a
detailed discussion of morphological vs. ontogenetic clas-
sification of stomata).
Stomatal dispersion
Stomata sometimes occur in crypts formed by the
prominently raised veins on the abaxial surface, as in H.
pubescens.
Four main patterns of stomatal dispersion over the
adaxial surface were identified. Stomata are either absent,
occur along margin and/or midrib only, occur mostly
along margin and veins, or occur throughout the entire
surface. These data are listed in Table 1. In the Madagas-
can species and the other genera stomata are either absent
or dispersed randomly across the entire surface. Hetero-
motpha sensu stricto by contrast, shows great variation.
H. stenophylla and H. gossweileri differ from the other
African species in their stomatal dispersion pattern which
is shared with all Polemanniopsis and Polemannia spe-
cies, but with only two Madagascan species (H. andoha-
helensis and //. bojeriana). In PI. papillosa this state
co-occurs with states 2 and 3 of Table 1 .
Stomatal distribution and density
The results of the stomatal density study are presented
in Figure 2. The data show that the variation in this char-
acter is independent of habit and also not logically corre-
lated with mesophytic or xerophytic habitats. Compared
to Heteromorpha, the other two genera are relatively in-
variant in terms of abaxial density (Figure 2A), having
values of around 110 per mm-. Across Heteromoipha ,
most species have between 100 and 200 stomata per mm2
on the abaxial surface. There are three Madagascan
species with much higher values. These are H. maroje-
jyensis (M2: mean = 279), H. tsaratananensis (M3: mean
= 293) and H. coursii (M4: mean = 265).
In the African Heteromorpha group, notable outliers
are H. involucrata ’ kassneri ’ form (IB: mean = 229), H.
gossweileri (4: mean = 220), and H. stenophylla (5: mean
= 88). The West African form of H. trifoliata — H. abys-
sinica sensu Jacques-Felix (1970) — is clearly distinguish-
able from all the central African forms of H. involucrata
(IB, 1C & ID; means = 229, 131 & 119 respectively).
Most species examined had none or virtually no adaxial
stomata (Figure 2B), whereas Polemannia has on average
just over 40 stomata per mm2, and a relatively high varia-
tion per species. Adaxial stomata are rare (mean less than
5 per mm2 or absent in most Heteromorpha species except
H. papillosa (3: mean = 16), H. gossweileri (4: mean =
88), H. stenophylla (5: mean = 27), H. andohahelensis
{Ml: mean = 8) and H. bojeriana (M8: mean = 17).
Epidermal ontogeny
As the leaves develop from the juvenile to the mature
stage, the proportion of stomata to normal epidermal cells
(Figure 3) remains constant in H. involucrata and H.
pubescens, whereas it decreases in both the typical and
the frutescent forms of H. trifoliata. This is not due to
fewer stomata being formed, but to a reduction in size of
the normal epidermal cells and thus a higher epidermal
cell density.
Trichome type
The variation in mature trichome types as well as their
distribution is summarized in Table 1 . Various types com-
prising seven character states were recognised and are
shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5. The papillate type
(Figures 4A; 5C2), which is also the juvenile type, has a
wide occurrence (present in all three genera), and is also
the only type for Polemanniopsis and Polemannia. Com-
pared to the Madagascan group where only the filamen-
tous, multicellular type is found in H. betsileensis alone,
the African species show a high diversity of form.
Papillate trichomes, similar to those shown in Figure
4A and 5C. were observed on the juvenile leaf margins
of Heteromorpha. These were present on the juvenile
leaves in all forms of the five African species investigated.
This feature appears to be variously lost or modified by
means of apical and sometimes basal cell differentiation
in the ontogeny of the mature types.
Tuberculate trichomes occur either as simple tubercles
(Figure 5C) or with one (Figures 4C; 5 A, B & E) or many
(Figure 4E) trichomes of another type affixed apically.
This condition was described by Townsend (1985) as
papillose, and is characteristic of H. pubescens and most
forms of H. involucrata. The term ‘verruculose’ used by
Townsend (1985) to describe the vestiture in H. goss-
weileri suggests the simple tuberculate type of trichome
(Figure 5C1). Although the SEM survey showed only the
papillate type (Figure 4A), which does bear a superficial
resemblance to the tuberculate type, light microscopy con-
finned the presence of both types (Figure 5C).
The filamentous/filiform type (Figures 4E; 5E) is found
only in H. pubescens and H. betsileensis, and in addition
to distribution and density of hairs, characterizes these
species. Short cylindrical hairs (Figures 4B; 5D) are char-
TABLE 1. — Epidermal character state distribution for leaves of Heteromorpha, Polemannia, and Polemanniopsis
190
Bothalia 24.2 ( 1994)
Adaxial stomatal distribution: 1 , absent; 2, margin only; 3, mostly margin and veins; 4, across entire surface.
Trichome type: 5, papillate; 6, conical; 7, long cylindric; 8, short cylindric; 9, filamentous; 10, tuberculate; 11, multicellular.
Trichome distribution: 12, margin; 13, adaxial midrib; 14, adaxial lateral veins; 15, entire adaxial surface; 16, abaxial midrib; 17, abaxial lateral veins; 18, entire abaxial surface.
+. present; -, absent; F, few; R, rare; B, basal only; 1MV. intramarginal vein.
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
191
HETEROMORPHA POLEMANNIOPSIS HETEROMORPHA
FIGURE 2. — A, abaxial density, and B, adaxial density of stomata in the genera Heteromorpha, Polemanniopsis and Polemannia. Range and mean
values of specimens examined are indicated for each species/form; •, absence of stomata; single values (n = 1 ) are denoted by a horizontal
bar only. Taxa numbered and sampled as under Specimens examined.
acteristic of H. arborescens and H. trifoliata , but are also
found in H. papillosa, the West African form of H. tri-
foliata, and occasionally (with other types) in some forms
of H. involucrata.
Other types that can be identified are 1, a unicellular
conical hair (Figures 4F; 5A), usually present in all forms
of H. involucrata', and 2, a unicellular or multicellular
long cylindrical hair (Figures 4D; 5B), present in the
central African forms of H. involucrata.
Trichome distribution
Patterns of laminar distribution of trichomes are sum-
marized in Table 1. Hairs, when present, are usually lo-
cated at least on the adaxial midrib (Figure 6A). This is,
however, only rarely the case in H. involucrata , where
the abaxial midrib is usually more pilose than the adaxial
midrib. The presence of trichomes along the leaf margin
is the rule in H. involucrata (Figure 6B & C) and the
exception in H. trifoliata. The West African form of H.
trifoliata can be distinguished from the typical form by
the presence of small tubercles, albeit sparse in some
specimens, along the leaf margin. The leaf margin in typi-
cal H. trifoliata is usually glabrous, or if pubescent (com-
monly in young growth ), then with short cylindrical hairs.
Both forms have cylindrical trichomes along the adaxial
midrib.
H. involucrata is the only species with trichomes on
the areas between the veins (and not on the veins and
margin only, as in all other species). H. pubescens has
192
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
FIGURE 3. — Variation in leaf epidermal ontogeny in Heteromorpha
indicated by differences in proportions of stomata to surrounding
cells between seedlings and mature leaves. This is a function of
the size and number of normal epidermal cells. 6B, H. trifoliata,
typical form. Winter 71; 6C, H. trifoliata , frutescent form.
Winter 57; I . //. involucrata. Winter 61; 2, H. pubescens. Winter
morphological features in common with H. involucrata,
and also shares the hairy abaxial midrib and presence of
hairs on the adaxial secondary venation (Townsend 1985)
in addition to those found elsewhere (Figure 6D).
H. gossweileri has a vestiture pattern, which for its
particular trichome type, is characteristic. The leaf margin,
midrib and major adaxial veins all have a variable number
of trichomes, often concentrated apically or basally
(Townsend 1985).
TAXONOMIC IMPLICATIONS
The anomocytic type of stomatal apparatus seems con-
servative, occurring throughout, with the exception of H.
betsileensis , suggesting a different position for this
species. This is also the only Madagascan species with
any degree of vestiture on the laminar region. The occur-
rence of a second stomatal type could indicate a
polyphyletic grouping of the Madagascan species, as this
feature appears to be rather conservative, and is a potential
character for tribal delimitation. A re-investigation of
generic limits is suggested. Abaxial stomatal density is a
potential grouping character within the Madagascan con-
tingent, and could support the division of the group into
two or more genera when these species are investigated
further.
The typical and frutescent forms of H. trifoliata, for
which seedlings were investigated, show an ontogenetic
feature not present in H. pubescens and H. involucrata,
namely a decrease in size of normal epidermal cells.
Three of the African species of Heteromorpha can be
distinguished from the others on the basis of the uniformly
dispersed adaxial stomata, a character which is shared
with Polemannia, Polemanniopsis and two Madagascan
species. This character may be logically correlated with
FIGURE 4. — Trichome types in
Heteromorpha sensu stricto.
A, H. gossweileri: papillate
hairs, resembling juvenile
state. B. West African form of
H. trifoliata: short cylindrical
hairs. C, H. involucrata, typi-
cal form: short conical hairs on
tuberculate base. D, H. in-
volucrata, ‘ kassneri ’ form: mul-
ticellular long cylindrical hairs.
E, H. pubescens: filamentous
trichomes on tuberculate base.
F, H. involucrata, 'Malawi'
form: conical trichomes. Scale
bars: 10 pm.
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
193
the high adaxial stomata] density in these species. H.
stenophylla , previously considered to be merely a form of
H. trifoliata (Schreiber 1967; Townsend 1985), is charac-
terized by having less than 100 abaxial stomata per mm2
and a substantially higher adaxial density than other
African species.
Papillate trichomes seem to be the primitive state from
which other states were derived. If the cell differentiation
in the development of the other trichome types were in-
vestigated, this could lead to a better understanding of the
phylogeny of Heteromorpha. The presence of small
tubercles (although sparse in some specimens) along the
leaf margin of the West African form of H. trifoliata raises
some doubt as to its present taxonomic position, and sug-
gests a closer affinity to the suffrutescent species H.
gossweileri , H. involucrata and H. pubescens. The abaxial
stomatal density distinguishes it from other suffrutescent
types with which it may be confused, namely some central
African forms of H. involucrata. The formal description
of this taxon has been indicated by other evidence, and
will be published elsewhere.
variation than the H. arborescens complex, and formal
recognition of infraspecific taxa may be useful.
CONCLUSIONS
Anomocytic stomata and papillate trichomes are con-
servative characters at the generic level. The density
and distribution of stomata are of limited value at this
level, but show some pattern at the species level.
Heteromorpha sensu stricto differs in the diversity of
trichome types, and this character is useful to distin-
guish some of the species.
Epidermal characters provide supporting evidence for
a less conservative treatment of the African species than
those of Cannon (1978) and Townsend (1985, 1989). The
degree of woodiness in Heteromorpha species is an im-
portant character and would seem to be correlated with
epidermal features. Without attention to habit, other char-
acters tend to be difficult to interpret.
H. pubescens and most forms of H. involucrata share,
along with other morphological characters, the distribution
of trichomes along abaxial midrib and venation, but are
distinguished on the basis of trichome type. Some forms
of H. involucrata exhibit deviation from the typical con-
dition of a hairy abaxial midrib. As currently cir-
cumscribed, this species shows as much if not more
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Financial support from the Foundation for Research
and Development is gratefully acknowledged. We would
like to thank Dr W. Oldewage for his instruction and as-
sistance with the SEM.
FIGURE 5. — Structure of trichome
types, as seen in Figure 4, in leaf
transverse sections of Hete-
romorpha sensu stricto. A, ft.
involucrata , typical form: coni-
cal trichome on a tuberculate
base. B, H. involucrata, ‘ kass -
neri’ form: multicellular, long,
cylindrical trichome. C, H.
gossweileri: 1, tuberculate and
2, papillate trichomes. D, H. tri-
foliata, typical form: short,
cylindrical trichomes. E, H.
pubescens : filamentous
trichomes on a tuberculate base.
194
Bothalia 24,2 ( 1994)
FIGURE 6. — Some examples of trichome distribution in Heteromorpha sensu. stricto. A, H. trifoliata : adaxial midrib. B, H. involucrata: abaxial
view, margin only. C, H. involucrata, ‘ kassneri' form: margin and adaxial surface. D, H. pubescens : abaxial view, along entire venation.
Scale bars: A-C, 50 pm; D, 100 pm.
REFERENCES
BARANOVA, M. 1992. Principles of comparative stomatographic
studies of flowering plants. The Botanical Review 58: 49-99.
BURTT, B.L. 1988. A new shrubby genus of African Umbelliferae. Notes
from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 45: 493-501.
CANNON, J.F.M. 1978. Umbelliferae. Flora zambesiaca 4: 578-581.
Flora Zambesiaca Managing Committee, London.
FEDER, N. & O'BRIEN, T.P. 1968. Plant microtechnique: Some prin-
ciples and new methods. American Journal of Botany 55: 123-
142.
GUYOT, M. 1971. Phylogenetic and systematic value of stomata of the
Umbelliferae. In V.H. Heywood, The biology and chemistry of the
Umbelliferae: 157-176. (Supplement 1 to Botanical Journal of
the Linnean Society 64).
HUMBERT, H. 1956. Contributions a P etude de la Flore de Madagascar
et des Comores. Fascicle 5. Notulae Systematicae , Paris 15: 1 13—
134.
JACQUES-FELIX, H. 1970. Ombellales. Flore du Cameroun 10: 74-77.
Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris.
RAM, H.Y.M. & NAYYAR, V.L. 1974. A rapid method of obtaining
epidermal peels in plants by treatment with cupric sulphate and
hydrochloric acid. Stain Technology 49: 1 14—1 16.
SCHREIBER, A. 1967. Apiaceae. Prodromus einer Flora von Siidwest-
afrika 103: 1-9. Cramer, Lehre.
TILNEY, P.M. 1986. The taxonomic significance of anatomical and
morphological characters in the southern African species of Can-
thium Lam. (Rubiaceae). Ph.D. thesis. University of Pretoria.
TOWNSEND, C.C. 1985. Some notes on species of Heteromorpha (Um-
belliferae). Kew Bulletin 40: 843-850.
TOWNSEND, C.C. 1989. Umbelliferae. In R.M. Polhill, Flora of tropi-
cal East Africa: 37-41. Balkema, Rotterdam.
Bothalia 24,2: 1 95-202 ( 1 994)
Inflorescence morphology of Lachnaea and Cryptadenia (Thymelaeaceae)
J.B.P. BEYERS* and J.J.A. VAN DER WALT**
Keywords: Cryptadenia , inflorescence morphology, Lachnaea, Thymelaeaceae
ABSTRACT
The current delimitation of Lachnaea L. and Cryptadenia Meisn. is based on the inflorescence morphology. In Lachnaea
both indeterminate and determinate inflorescences occur, whereas in Cryptadenia only determinate inflorescences are present.
The indeterminate inflorescences in Lachnaea are capitate or umbellate. The determinate inflorescences in both genera
comprise a solitary, terminal flower. It is concluded that the two genera cannot be distinguished on inflorescence structure.
UITTREKSEL
Lachnaea en Cryptadenia word tans op grand van hul bloeiwyses onderskei. Beide onbepaalde en bepaalde bloeiwyses kom
by Lachnaea voor, terwyl by Cryptadenia net bepaalde bloeiwyses voorkom. Die onbepaalde bloeiwyses by Lachnaea is hofies
of skerms. Die bepaalde bloeiwyses by beide genera bestaan uit 'n enkel, terminale blom. Die gevolgtrekking word gemaak dat
die twee genera nie op grand van die struktuur van die bloeiwyses onderskei kan word nie.
INTRODUCTION
The Thymelaeaceae, which is regarded as a medium-
sized family comprising 50 genera and 720 species, occurs
in both temperate and tropical regions (Mabberley 1990).
Most genera belong to the subfamily Thymelaeoideae in-
cluding the genus Lachnaea L. and the genus Cryptadenia
Meisn. Both these genera are endemic in the Cape
Province.
In the classification systems of the Thymelaeaceae by
Endlicher (1847, sec. Domke 1934), Meisner (1857), Ben-
tham & Hooker (1880), Gilg (1894) and Domke (1934),
Lachnaea and Cryptadenia have always been placed next
to each other, reflecting their close affinity. Only one pre-
vious worker, Baillon (1880), did not regard Cryptadenia
as a separate genus but as a section of Lachnaea. In the
last taxonomic treatment of the two genera, Wright (1915)
followed the classification of Bentham & Hooker (1880).
The floral morphology of Lachnaea and its closest re-
lated genus, Cryptadenia, is similar. The Bowers are
bisexual, tetramerous, apetalous, with eight floral scales
inserted on the hypanthium below the insertion of the
eight stamens, which are arranged in two whorls of four
each. To distinguish between these two genera Wright
(1915) used the inflorescence structure. In Lachnaea he
regarded the flowers to be terminal, capitate or rarely
solitary, whereas in Cryptadenia he described them as
axillary, solitary and bibracteolate. A study of the descrip-
tions of the different taxa of both genera revealed that L.
axillaris Meisn., L. micrcintha Schltr. and L. ruscifolia
Compton have flowers which are axillary and solitary,
whereas the flowers of L. penicillata Meisn., according
to Wright (1915), are terminal and solitary. If one should
apply the criterion used by Wright (1915), the former three
* National Botanical Institute, RO.Box 471, Stellenbosch 7599.
**Department of Botany, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch 7600.
MS. received: 1993-06-22.
species should rather be placed in Cryptadenia. Thus, the
criterion used by Wright does not hold.
A preliminary examination of herbarium specimens of
the Western Cape herbaria has brought to light numerous
misidentifications and incertae, illustrating the poor state
of our knowledge of Lachnaea and Cryptadenia. The con-
fusion which presently exists regarding the delimitation
of Lachnaea and Cryptadenia can be partly ascribed to
the inconsistencies in Wright’s interpretation of the in-
florescence morphology of these two genera (Wright
1915). As the inflorescence has been considered to be of
great taxonomic importance in the past, the study of the
inflorescence morphology was undertaken with the view
to improving our understanding of these two genera.
Meisner (1840) instituted three sections, Sphaero-
clinium Meisn., Conoclinium Meisn. and Microclinium
Meisn., within Lachnaea, based on the inflorescence mor-
phology. In his later publication of 1857 he followed the
same classification. In the section Sphaeroclinium he in-
cluded those taxa having a terminal, dense, many-
flowered capitulum, which was either involucrate or
evolucrate, the sessile flowers being arranged on a
moderately thick, globose receptacle. Meisner (1840,
1857) included L. buxifolia Lam. and L. filarnentosa
(Thunb.) Meisn. in this section. In the section Cono-
clinium he regarded the inflorescence as a terminal or sub-
terminal, few- to many-flowered, evolucrate capitulum.
Here the moderately thick receptacle was at first hemis-
pherical to conical but by later elongating, became sub-
cylindrical. From the regular arrangement of the flower
scars on the receptacle, he regarded the inflorescence as
a spike and not a capitulum. In this section he included
L. capitata (L.) Meisn. and L. densiflora Meisn. In the
section Microclinium he included those taxa having
flowers in sessile, terminal, subcapitate or subsolitary in-
florescences, or those rarely having axillary, solitary
flowers, namely L. axillaris, L. diostnoides Meisn., L.
ericoides Meisn. and L. penicillata Meisn. Meisner (1840)
196
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
regarded the flowers of Cryptadenia as terminal, solitary
or geminate, or occasionally as axillary and solitary, but
in his later publication of 1857 he described the flowers
as being terminal and subsolitary.
Gilg (1894) regarded the inflorescences in Lachnaea
as usually being terminal, many-flowered heads, but oc-
casionally, when consisting of two flowers, as mostly axil-
lary. In Cryptadenia he regarded the flowers as solitary,
axillary, with two bracteoles.
Domke (1934) described the inflorescences in Lach-
naea as being usually terminal heads, which are basally
enclosed by an involucre, or congested heads without an
involucre. No mention was made of the solitary-flowered
inflorescence in his generic description of the genus. In
Cryptadenia he regarded the flowers as being solitary or
few, either terminal or axillary with two bracteoles.
Dyer (1975) followed Wright (1915) and also used the
inflorescence structure to distinguish between Lachnaea
and Cryptadenia. According to Dyer (1975) the flowers
in Lachnaea are arranged either in terminal, bracteate or
ebracteate heads or a congested spike, or are rarely
solitary, whereas in Cryptadenia the flowers are axillary
and solitary.
In the most recent publication on the inflorescence
morphology of the Thymelaeaceae, Weberling & Herkom-
mer (1989) regarded the inflorescences in Lachnaea as
being capitate or spicate, or having solitary, axillary
flowers borne on a proliferating spike as in L. axillaris.
In Cryptadenia they considered the flowers as being
solitary and terminal.
From the above literature survey there seems to be con-
sensus with regard to the terminal, many-flowered heads
but not with regard to the position of the single-flowered
inflorescences in Lachnaea. Similarly in Cryptadenia dif-
ferent views are expressed with regard to the position of
the inflorescence and the number of flowers in an inflores-
cence.
The aim of the present investigation was to determine
whether the inflorescence morphology could be used to
delimit the two genera.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Material used in this study comprised herbarium
specimens and plants collected in the wild, with the ex-
ception of L. nervosa Meisn. of which fresh material was
unobtainable. Eighteen taxa were selected, 14 from Lach-
naea and four from Cryptadenia. The aim in selecting the
taxa was to have as broad a representation as possible of
all the taxa in the two genera. The criteria used for select-
ing the taxa were: 1, taxa representative of the three sec-
tions instituted by Meisner ( 1 840), taking in account the
variation in each section; and 2, taxa with solitary flowers.
Four of the five species of Cryptadenia currently
recognized were studied. Cryptadenia hreviflora Meisn.
was excluded as it is an intermediate taxon between Cryp-
tadenia grandiflora (L.f.) Meisn. and Cryptadenia uni-
flora Meisn. Levyns (1950) considered C. hreviflora as a
hybrid between the two species.
The 18 species studied were: Lachnaea aurea Eckl. &
Zeyh., L. axillaris , L. burchellii Meisn., L. buxifolia, L.
capitata , L. densiflora , L. diosmoides, L. ericoides, L.
eriocephala L., L. filamentosa , L. funicaulis Schinz, L.
nervosa , L. penicillata , L. ruscifolia , Cryptadenia filicaulis
Meisn., C. grandiflora , C. laxa Wright and C. uniflora
(nomenclature according to Arnold & De Wet 1993).
RESULTS
Inflorescence structure within Lachnaea
Both major types of inflorescences, as recognized by
Radford et al. (1974) and Cronquist (1988), namely in-
determinate and determinate, occur in Lachnaea.
Indeterminate inflorescences
Within the indeterminate inflorescences the capitulum
and the umbel are represented.
1. Species with capitula
L. buxifolia, L. capitata, L. densiflora and L. filamen-
tosa have terminal, multi-flowered, ebracteate capitula.
These capitula are borne singly at the ends of branches
on sericeous peduncles, which vary in length from 3-10
mm. The sessile flowers are arranged on a moderately
thick, convex receptacle, which elongates during the
flowering period, becoming narrowly conical or conical.
Different stages of flower development are present within
a capitulum. The fruiting stage may be present basally
while buds are still developing distally. An accurate num-
ber of flowers in an inflorescence is therefore not easily
determined. The number of mature flowers, at a given
time, varies from ± 50 in L. buxifolia, 20-50 in L. filamen-
tosa, ± 12 in L. densiflora and only 1-3 in L. capitata.
After flowering, vegetative growth is resumed by
lateral branches developing in the axils of the upper leaves
immediately beneath the capitulum. These will eventually
terminate in new capitula in the following flowering
period. However, some of these lateral shoots, as in L.
densiflora , may terminate in capitula within the same
flowering period. Lateral branches may also develop from
the axils of the leaves below the distal leaf on the main
flowering branches. These branches will, in the following
flowering period, be terminated by capitula (Figure 1).
2. Species with umbels
Two types of indeterminate umbels, namely bracteate
umbels as in L. eriocephala and ebracteate umbels as in
L. diosmoides, are recognized. The pedicels remain in the
old inflorescences for some time after the upper portion
of the flowers and the fruits have been shed. The number
of pedicels present indicates the number of flowers in each
inflorescence.
Bothalia 24,2 ( 1 994)
197
FIGURE 1. — Capitate inflorescences of Lachnaea species. A, capitulum of L. capitata, Beyers 128 , illustrating elongated receptacle after lower
flowers have been shed; B, capitulum of L. biixifolia , Beyers 122, with flowers partly removed. Diagrammatic illustration of branching pattern
of flowering branches: C, L. densiflora ; D, L. filamentosa: ■. remains of previous year's inflorescence; O, flowering capitulum; • ,
capitulum with fruits only; v, bud of new vegetative shoot.
2. 1 . Species with sessile bracteate umbels
Sessile, bracteate umbels occur in L. aurea , L.
eriocephala and L penicillata. In L. eriocephala (Figure
2) the inflorescence is comprised of about 40 shortly
pedicellate flowers, which are surrounded by a bracteate
involucrum consisting of four large bracts, in two whorls
of two. These bracts follow on the stem after the linear-
elliptic to lanceolate leaves. Similarly in L. aurea the ±
50-flowered umbel is surrounded by 8-10 bracts which
are spirally arranged. From the axils of the foliage leaves
immediately below the bracteate umbels, vegetative
growth is resumed by lateral branches in both species.
These lateral branches will eventually terminate in brac-
teate umbels in the following flowering period. Lateral
branching is not only restricted to the axil of the distal
leaf when the leaves are alternately arranged as in L.
aurea, or to the distal pair of leaves, when opposite as in
L. eriocephala, but may originate from the axils of the
other upper foliage leaves. These lateral branches are also
terminated by bracteate umbels in the following flowering
period. In both cases the lateral branches may elongate
considerably.
In L. penicillata (Figure 3) the inflorescence is also a
terminal bracteate umbel. The umbel, usually eight-
flowered, is surrounded by four bracts, in two whorls of
two each. Only the distal portion of a single mature flower
is visible at a time. Wright (1915) inadvertently regarded
the flowers as being ‘terminal, solitary, sessile7. The elon-
gated pedicels and buds enclosed by the bracts were ig-
nored by him. Lateral branching arises from the axils of
either the first or second pair of foliage leaves immedi-
ately below the inflorescence. These lateral branches may
elongate considerably or may be reduced to comprising
only one or two pairs of foliage leaves before being ter-
FIGURE 2. — L. eriocephala, Beyers 54. A, diagrammatic illustration of
branching pattern of flowering branches; B, bracteate umbel with
flowers and bracts removed; C, abaxial view of one of inner pair
of bracts; D, abaxial view of one of outer pair of bracts; ■.remains
of previous year’s inflorescence; V, umbel: b, scar of removed
bract; p. pedicel.
198
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
FIGURE 3. — L. penicillata , Oliver &
Fellingham 9145. A, flower-
ing branch with a terminal
bracteate umbel; B, diagram-
matic illustration of branching
pattern of flowering branches;
■, remains of previous year's
inflorescence; V, umbel; b,
bract; fl, foliage leaf; v, new
vegetative shoot.
minated by an inflorescence. Up to three generations of
flowering branches may develop in one flowering period.
Vegetative growth is resumed by lateral branches develop-
ing from the axils of the upper foliage leaves of the last
flowering generation.
2.2. Species with sessile ebracteate umbels
In L. diosmoides, L. ericoides , L. junicaulis and L. ner-
vosa the flowers are borne in sessile, ebracteate umbels
at the tips of the branches. No bracts surround the in-
florescence as new vegetative growth arises from the axils
of the leaves immediately beneath the umbel (Figure 4).
The number of flowers per umbel varies among the dif-
ferent species and also within each species. In L. dios-
moides and L. junicaulis 6-20 flowers are present, where-
as in L. nerx’osa the number varies from 4—14 and in L.
ericoides from 2-8. As a result of the different develop-
mental stages of the flowers present in each umbel, only
a few mature flowers are present at a time. Lateral branch-
ing is resumed from the axil of the upper leaves below
the inflorescences but is not restricted only to the most
distal leaves immediately behind the inflorescence. In L.
nervosa (Figure 4) short, lateral branches also arise in the
axils of the leaves lower down on the main flowering
branch, which in the same flowering period are terminated
by inflorescences. Consequently the main flowering
FIGURE 4. — Diagrammatic illustration of branching pattern of flowering branches; A, L. ericoides ; B, L. nervosa. C, terminal ebracteate umbel in
L. nervosa, De Kock 152 , illustrating new vegetative shoot (v) in the axil of the distal foliage leaf (fl). ■. remains ot previous year's
inflorescence; V, umbel.
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
199
branch has the appearance of a racemose inflorescence.
Similarly in L. diosmoides lateral vegetative shoots arising
in the axils of the leaves immediately below the inflores-
cence, may be terminated by inflorescences in the same
flowering period. Here they may overtop the umbel on
the main flowering branch, forming a dense cluster of
umbels, and at the same time reduced lateral shoots may
develop lower down in the axils of the foliage leaves of
the same main branch with a racemose appearance, as in
L. nervosa.
In L. ericoides (Figure 4) a first and second generation
of flowering shoots may occur. These shoots, as in the
previous taxa, develop from the axils of the leaves imme-
diately below the inflorescence. Below the most distal leaf
on the main flowering shoot, further lateral shoots may
develop which may terminate in inflorescences in the
same flowering period or in the next flowering period.
These flowering shoots are, unlike those in L. diosmoides ,
restricted to the upper leaves on the main flowering
branch. Vegetative shoots may also develop lower down
on the main flowering branches of the previous flowering
period which again will be terminated by inflorescences
in the following flowering period.
In L.funicaulis a pair of bract-like foliage leaves occurs
at the base of the umbels. These umbels appear bracteate
and resemble those of L. penicillata, but, unlike L. penicil-
lata, lateral vegetative growth develops in the axils of the
bract-like foliage leaves. These lateral vegetative shoots
will terminate in ebracteate umbels in the following
flowering period. Reduced lateral shoots also develop in
the axils of the upper leaves, behind the bract-like foliage
leaves on the main flowering branch, which may tenninate
in ebracteate umbels within the same flowering period,
forming a cluster of inflorescences towards the end of the
main flowering branch.
In L. burchellii (Figure 5), contrary to the interpretation
of Meisner (1840, 1857) and Wright (1925) who regarded
the inflorescences to be bracteate, the inflorescences are
terminal, sessile, ebracteate umbels. The umbels consist
of up to ten flowers, with 1 or 2 mature flowers at a time.
Vegetative growth is resumed from the axils of the leaves
immediately below the umbels. On some specimens the
inflorescences appear to be bracteate. These 'bracteate'
umbels are in fact reduced lateral branches, each ter-
minated by an ebracteate umbel. The leaves on these
branches differ in size and shape from the foliage leaves
on the rest of the plant. In the axil of the most distal leaf
FIGURE 5. — L. burchellii. A, diagrammatic illustration of branching pattern of flowering branches; B, terminal ebracteate umbel, Spreeth 155', C,
short lateral flowering shoot illustrating new vegetative shoot (v) in axil of bract-like leaf, Spreeth 155: D, short lateral flowering shoot, Oliver
9251: E, elongated lateral flowering shoot showing similar small prophylls (p) basally; s, scar of caducous bract-like leaves; V, umbel.
200
Bothalia 24,2 ( 1994)
FIGURE 6. — L. axillaris. A, dowering
shoot illustrating new vegeta-
tive shoot in axil of distal leaf,
Morley 174 ; B, diagrammatic
illustration of branching pattern
of flowering branches; ■, scar
of flower of previous year; ©,
flower bud; O, open flower; •,
fruit.
on one of these reduced flowering branches, a well-
developed bud of the new vegetative shoot was observed.
The lower two pairs of leaves on some of the elongated
lateral flowering branches, resemble those modified
foliage leaves of the reduced flowering branches. These
leaves are often caducous. Vegetative growth is resumed
by lateral branches developing from the axils of the upper
leaves immediately below the umbel and may also
originate from the leaf axils lower down on the main
flowering branch. These lateral branches will terminate in
umbels in the following flowering period. Flowering
branches may develop at random on the main flowering
branch, as in L. nervosa. These flowering branches arise
from the axils of the leaves behind the most distal leaf
pair during the same flowering period. The main flowering
branch thus has the appearance of a racemose inflores-
cence.
Determinate inflorescences
Meisner (1840) described the flowers of L. axillaris as
being axillary, opposite or scattered, always solitary, with
two intra-axillary bracteoles. In his later publication
(1857) he referred to the flowers as being subsolitary, axil-
lary or rarely terminal. Wright (1915) regarded the flowers
as being axillary and solitary. According to Weberling &
Herkommer (1989) the flowers of L. axillaris are solitary,
axillary with two transverse bracteoles.
The flowers of L. axillaris were found to be solitary
and terminal. A well-developed bud of the new vegetative
shoot occurs in the axil of one of the leaves of the pair
of foliage leaves immediately below the flower (Figure
6). Lateral branches, each terminated by a solitary flower,
develop at random on the main flowering branches within
the same flowering period. These flowering branches arise
from the axils of the foliage leaves below the leaf pair
immediately behind the terminal flower. These lateral
flowering branches vary in length and may even be
reduced to having one pair of opposite leaves. Conse-
quently the main flowering branch may have the ap-
pearance of a racemose or spicate inflorescence (Figure
6). Previous authors inadvertently regarded these leaves
immediately behind the solitary flower as transverse brac-
teoles. It was found that the new vegetative growth
originates in the axils of these leaves and terminates in
flowers in the following flowering period. This growth is
not always visible on herbarium material as specimens
are usually collected when they are in full flower.
The flowers of L. mscifolia were regarded by Compton
(1953) as being ‘solitary, axillary, sessile’. On studying
fresh material in the fruiting stage, well-developed vegeta-
tive buds were found in the axils of the bracteoles (Figure
7). These bracteoles are in fact bracteose foliage leaves
similar to those found on the short lateral flowering shoots
in L. burchellii. In L. ruscifolia the flowers are therefore
solitary and terminal on much reduced, lateral, flowering
shoots which develop at random in the axils of the foliage
leaves on the main flowering branches giving them a spi-
cate appearance (Figure 7). Occasionally the lateral
flowering shoot may consist of an additional pair of
foliage leaves between the bracteose leaves (prophylls)
and the flower (Figure 7). No terminal flower was ob-
served on the main branches probably due to the abortion
of the apical meristem. From the axil of the leaf behind
the aborted meristem new vegetative growth may resume
or a reduced flowering shoot may develop (Figure 7). Two
scarious prophylls which resemble the bracteose leaves
on the lateral flowering shoot, occur at the base of the
developing lateral vegetative shoot (Figure 7).
Thus, in both L. axillaris and L. ruscifolia the inflores-
cences are determinate, consisting of solitary, terminal
flowers.
Inflorescence structure within Cryptadenia
The inflorescences in Crytadenia are all cymose. In all
the taxa well-developed buds of the new proliferating
shoot develop in the axils of the upper leaf pair immedi-
ately behind the flower (Figure 8). These vegetative shoots
usually terminate in flowers in the following flowering
period, except in C. filicaulis and C. grandiflora where
they may terminate in flowers in the same flowering
period. Lateral branches may also arise at random from
the axils of the leaves beneath the distal pair below the
terminal flower on the main flowering branch. These
branches vary in length and may even be reduced to only
the terminal flower and a pair of foliage leaves as in C.
filicaulis (Figure 8). Consequently the main flowering
branch, as in L. axillaris, has the appearance of a racemose
Botha] ia 24,2(1994)
201
or spicate inflorescence. Lateral branches, each terminat-
ing in a solitary flower in the following flowering period,
may also develop from the axils of the leaves lower down
on the main flowering branches (Figure 8).
DISCUSSION
In the genus Lachnaea the flowers are arranged in ter-
minal, indeterminate, capitate or umbellate inflorescences,
or they are solitary and terminal. In Cryptadenia the
flowers are solitary and terminal. Determinate inflorescen-
ces occur in both Lachnaea and Cryptadenia, whereas
indeterminate inflorescences occur only in Lachnaea.
Table 1.
In both genera the differentiation of a long shoot/short
shoot system can be observed. In some taxa within Lach-
naea and Cryptadenia this system is more conspicuous
than in others. In both genera new vegetative growth
arises from the axils of the foliage leaves immediately
below the inflorescences, and this may terminate in an
inflorescence within the same flowering period. Thus two
generations of flowering branches may occur together on
a plant (Figures 4 & 8).
Weberling & Herkommer (1989) regarded the terminal,
single-flowered inflorescence found in Cryptadenia as a
monotelic inflorescence. The inflorescence in L. axillaris
and L. ruscifolia can therefore be regarded as monotelic.
The polytelic inflorescence on the other hand would, ac-
cording to their terminology, include the capitulum and
umbel in Lachnaea. According to Weberling (1983) the
polytelic type of inflorescence has probably been derived
repeatedly from the monotelic type during the evolution
of angiosperms by the reduction of the terminal flower
and specialization of the paracladia of the monotelic sys-
tem. The distal elements are reduced to single lateral
flowers or lateral cymes, which constitute elements of an
apical system composed of lateral flowers. Therefore the
floral axis, instead of terminating in a single flower, ter-
minates in a multi-flowered polytelic inflorescence.
According to Weberling & Herkommer (1989) Gony-
stylus Teijsm. & Binn. and Amyxa van Tiegh. of the Gony-
styloideae which is regarded as a relatively primitive
group, have monotelic synflorescences (synflorescence
according to Weberling 1983). Within the Thyme-
laeoideae, the Gnidioideae and probably the Aquila-
rioideae, certain taxa were also found to have monotelic
synflorescences. They came to the conclusion that, con-
sidering the other more or less primitive characters and
the different taxonomic evaluation of those combinations,
it was impossible to draw any taxonomic conclusions ex-
clusively from the existence of the monotelic synflores-
cences within those taxa.
FIGURE7. — L. ruscifolia. A, branch illustrating aborted apical meristem (a) being displaced by new lateral shoot developing from axil of distal
foliage leaf .Marshall 39; B, main branch with short lateral flowering shoot, Vlok 166; C, diagrammatic illustration of branching pattern
of flowering branches; D, flower bud with two bracteose leaves (p), Vlok 166 ; E, vegetative shoot (v) arising from axil of one of bracteose
leaves; f, flower; fl, foliage leaf; A, aborted apical meristem; ©, flower bud; O, open flower; •.fruit; ■. scar of flower of a previous
year.
202
TABLE 1. — Inflorescence characters of Cryptadenia and Lachnaea
Weberling & Herkommer (1989) regarded the ramifi-
cation type of the polytelic synflorescences in the Thyme-
laeaceae to be thyrsic. Within many genera, according to
them, these synflorescences have been reduced to
racemes, spikes or umbels and in some taxa, as in Lach-
naea, the umbel-like aggregation of flowers is combined
with the formation of an involucrum.
From the above one could conclude that within Lach-
naea the terminal, solitary flower is the primitive state
and that the bracteate umbel is the advanced state.
CONCLUSION
The inflorescence morphology revealed determinate and
indeterminate inflorescences in Lachnaea and only deter-
minate inflorescences in Cryptadenia. In both genera the
determinate inflorescence comprises a solitary, terminal
llower. No distinct differences with regard to the inflores-
cence morphology could be found between these two genera.
Therefore the inflorescence structure can not, as in the past,
be used to distinguish between the two genera.
REFERENCES
ARNOLD, T.H. & DE WET, B.C. 1993. Plants of southern Africa: names
and distribution. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa
No. 62.
BAILLON, H. 1880. The natural history of plants, Vol. 6. Reeve, London.
BENTHAM, G. & HOOKER, J.D. 1880. Genera plantarum, Vol. 3.
Reeve, London.
COMPTON, R.H. 1953. Lachnaea ruscifolia. Journal of South African
Botany 19: 132.
CRONQUIST, A. 1988. The evolution and classification of flowering
plants, 2nd edn. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York.
DOMKE, W. 1934. Untersuchungen liber die systematische und
geographische Gliederung der Thymelaeaceen nebst einer
Neubeschreibung ihrer Gattungen. Bibliotheca Botanica 27: 1-
151.
DYER, R.A. 1975. The genera of southern African flowering plants,
Vol. I . Department of Agricultural Technical Services, Pretoria.
G1LG, E. 1894. Thymelaeaceae. In A. Engler & K. Prantl, Die Natiir-
lichen Pflanzenfamilien T.III Abt. 6a: 216-245. Leipzig.
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
FIGURE 8. — Inflorescence structure and branching patterns of Cryp-
tadenia species. A, flowering shoot in C. laxa. Bodkin sub Guthrie
3585. Diagrammatic illustration of branching pattern of flower-
ing branches: B, C. filicaulis; C, C. uniflora; ©, flower bud; O,
open flower; •, fruit; ■, scar of flower of a previous year.
LEVYNS, M.R. 1950. Thymelaeaceae. In R.S. Adamson & T.M. Salter,
Flora of the Cape Peninsula. Juta, Cape Town.
MABBERLEY, D.J. 1990. The plant-book. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge.
MEISNER, C.F. 1840. Synopsis Thymelaearum, Polygonearum et
Begoniarum Africae Australis, imprimus a cl. J.J.Drege lectarum.
Linnaea 14: 385-516.
MEISNER, C.F. 1857. Thymelaeaceae. In A.P. de Candolle, Prodromus
systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 14: 573-580. Victoris Mas-
son. Paris.
RADFORD, A.E., DICKISON, W.C., MASSEY, J.R. & BELL, C.R.
1974. Vascular plant systematics. Harper & Row, New York.
WEBERLING, F. 1983. Fundamental features of modem inflorescence
morphology. Bothalia 14: 917-922.
WEBERLING, F. & HERKOMMER, U. 1989. Untersuchungen zur In-
floreszenz-Morphologie der Thymelaeaceen. Tropische und Sub-
tmpische Pflanzenwelt 68: 1-124.
WRIGHT, C.H. 1915. Thymelaeaceae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora
capensis 5,1: 1-80. Reeve, London.
WRIGHT, C.H. 1925. Thymelaeaceae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora
capensis 5,4: 583, 584. Reeve, London.
Bothalia 24,2: 203-210(1994)
Morphological and ultrastructural variations in Schizaea pectinata
(Schizaeaceae: Pteridophyta)
B.M. PARKINSON*
Keywords: exospore structure, morphology, perispore formation, Schizaeaceae, Schizaea pectinata, sporogenesis, tapetal organisation, ultrastructure
ABSTRACT
Schizaea pectinata (L.) Sw. was collected from the extreme ends of its geographical range in South Africa for a study of
sporangial development, sporogenesis and tapetal organisation. Differences were noted in the gross morphology, in sporangium
size, spore size and in the patterning of the outer exospore from the two sites. Coiled structures were associated with the
development of the inner perispore in spores collected from the Transvaal, whereas dense, heterogeneous bodies were associated
with the formation of this layer in spores from the Cape. Differences were also noted in the organisation of the tapetum. A
cellular, parietal tapetum and a plasmodial tapetum were present in the Cape material when the spores had developed the
sculptured outer exospore. In sporangia from the Transvaal, however, only a plasmodial tapetum was present at the same stage
of sporoderm development. A detailed study of S. pectinata throughout its distribution is required to determine the taxonomic
importance of these findings.
UITTREKSEL
Schizaea pectinata (L.) Sw. is in die twee uithoeke van sy verspreidingsgebied in Suid-Afrika versamel vir ’n ondersoek van
sporangiumontwikkeling, sporogenese en tapetumorganisasie. Verskille in algehele morfologie, sporangiumgrootte,
spoorgrootte en in die versiering van die buitenste eksospoor, is in die twee versamelplekke aangeteken. By spore wat in die
Transvaal versamel is, is gekrulde strukture met die ontwikkeling van die binneste perispoor geassosieer, terwyl digte,
heterogene strukture met die vorming van hierdie laag by Kaapse spore, geassosieer is. Verskille in die organisasie van die
tapetum is ook waargeneem. 'n Sellulere, parietale tapetum en ’n plasmodiese tapetum het in die Kaapse materiaal voorgekom
by spore waar die versierde buitenste eksospoor ontwikkel het. By sporangiums wat in die Transvaal versamel is, was daar teen
dieselfde stadium van sporodermontwikkeling egter slegs ’n plasmodiese tapetum teenwoordig. ’n Breedvoerige ondersoek van
5. pectinata , regdeur die organisme se verspreiding, word benodig om die taksonomiese belang van hierdie bevindings te bepaal.
INTRODUCTION
An investigation of sporangial development, sporo-
genesis and tapetal organisation in Schizaea pectinata (L.)
Sw. was carried out on material collected from Ysterkroon
in the Northern Transvaal (2429BB Zebediela) and from
the Cape of Good Hope Nature Reserve (341 8AD
Simonstown). The Transvaal material was collected at an
altitude of 2 046 m in an area of vegetation described as
Northeastern Mountain Sourveld (Acocks 1988). The
plants were small, approximately 80 mm high, and were
found in well-protected sites at the bases of outcrops of
Black Reef quartzite. The plants were obscured by large
tussocks of Themeda triandra Forssk. and other coarse
grasses. Plants from the Western Cape were collected from
several sites, at altitudes below 150 m, all of which had
well-drained, highly leached, shallow sandy hthosols in
areas of Mesic Mountain Fynbos (Macdonald, Clark &
Taylor 1989). These plants regenerated quickly after fire,
becoming fertile after about four months of growth in
open situations. They gradually became overgrown and
shaded as other fynbos plants regenerated. In the second
and subsequent years following fire they produced few
new fronds. Voucher specimens (Cape J 06727 3, Trans-
vaal J067274) are housed in the C.E. Moss Herbarium
* Department of Botany, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3,
WITS 2050.
MS. received: 1992-11-26.
(J). In studying the ontogeny of the sporoderm, several
features were noted which differed in the specimens from
the two sites. These included variations in the sculpturing
of the outer exospore and in structures involved with the
development of the inner perispore. This led to a closer
study of the material to ascertain whether the differences
were constant features.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Material was fixed in the field in 2% paraformaldehyde
and 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.08 M Pipes buffer at pH 8.0
(Colhoun & Steer 1981), washed in ice-cold buffer and
post-fixed on ice using 2% OsOq followed by washing
and dehydration through a graded acetone series.
Specimens were transferred into propylene oxide, in-
filtrated with resin using mixtures of propylene oxide and
resin and finally embedded in Epon (Luft 1961).
Sections 1 pm thick were stained in toluidine blue for
light microscopy and 60 nm ultra-thin sections were
stained in uranyl acetate and lead citrate for viewing in a
Jeol 100S transmission electron microscope at 80 Kv.
Specimens for scanning electron microscopy were
selected from material in primary fixative but were not
post-fixed. They were washed in buffer, passed through a
graded ethanol series, transferred to propylene oxide and
dried by the critical point method in a Balzers Union CPD
model 020. The specimens were mounted onto aluminium
204
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
stubs coated with pressure sensitive adhesive and coated
with gold-palladium prior to viewing in a Jeol JSM-840
microscope at 15 Kv.
Sporal features were observed on fixed and processed
material from the two sites and a quantitative survey was
also carried out on fixed material.
Measurements of the sporangia and the spores from
each of the collection sites was based on a sample size
of 50 specimens. Sporangium length was measured from
the base of the capsule to the top of the annulus and the
width was measured at the widest point. The length and
width of spores complete with perispore were recorded.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Gross morphology
Plants from the Transvaal were small, approximately
100 mm high with only a few fronds which had
regenerated after fire (Figure 1A). Between seven and
nine pairs of modified pinnae were supported on a straight
rachis held at an angle of about 100° from the photosyn-
thetic stipe.
Plants collected from the Cape (Figure IB) were
robust, about 200 mm high and formed extensive clumps
with large numbers of fronds (± 50) which had
regenerated after fire. The pinnae pairs numbered between
14 and 18. The rachis passed through a straight phase
during the unfolding of the crozier but was distinctly
curved at maturity.
Variations in the gross morphology of the plants from
the two sites which are approximately 2 000 km apart,
were initially thought to indicate ecotypes of S. pectinata.
Variation in size of specimens collected at different al-
titudes had been commented on by Roux (1979). There
are known cases of exceptional morphological variability
within populations in other ferns from disjunct parts of
their range, as in Thelypteris palustris Schott (Tryon &
Lugardon 1991). Tryon & Tryon (1982) stated that the
systematics of the tropical American Schizaea Sm. are not
adequately known, largely due to a lack of field studies
necessary to establish the extent of variation within the
species and that there may be greater morphological diver-
sity than is currently recognised. The latter comment
probably also applies to the southern African members of
the genus, as confirmed by the anomalous results obtained
in this material.
Spore and sporangium size
Minimum and maximum dimensions of spores and
sporangia are presented in Table 1 and sample mean
values and standard deviations are presented in Table 2.
All measurements were statistically analysed by the
Student’s two sample t test (Parker 1979) and the differen-
ces were found to be statistically significant.
In the Cape sample, 76% of the spores were found in
a narrow range between 84 pm and 88.5 pm in length
FIGURE 1. — Gross morphology of plants of Schizaea pectinata. A,
J067274 from Ysterkroon in the Wolkberg, Transvaal; B,
.1067273 from the Cape of Good Hope Nature Reserve.
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
205
TABLE 1 . — Spore and sporangial size in S. pectinata (pm )
while 80% of the Transvaal spores lay in a range between
105.5 pm and 115 pm.
A narrow range of variation in width was also found
in the Cape spores where 72% measured between 55.2
pm and 60 pm and 66% of the spores from the Transvaal
population measured between 60 pm and 67.2 pm. When
individual measurements of spore length and width were
plotted, the scattergram (Figure 2A) showed that there was
no overlap between the two populations with respect to
spore size.
A similar trend was seen in dimensions of sporangia
from the Cape sample where 84% of the sporangia lay
within a relatively narrow range between 580 pm and 650
pm in length, and in the Transvaal sample 76% of the
sporangia were found in the range between 698 pm and
744 pm.
Outer exospore sculpturing
The exospore in 5. pectinata consists of two layers
(Parkinson 1991). The inner exospore is a smooth layer
approximately 85 nm wide. The outer exospore which
forms the bulk of the exospore is sculptured and reaches
a maximum thickness of between 4 pm and 5 pm. The
sculpturing differs in the Transvaal and Cape material
(Figures 3 & 4). Spores from the Transvaal site (Figures
3A, C; 4A) have indentations (punctae) which are ap-
proximately 1 pm in diameter with ridges of the same
dimension separating them. The ridges have an uneven
but continuous surface and the inner surface of the punctae
is smooth. Spores from the Cape site (Figures 3B, D; 4B)
are also punctate. The punctae however, are 1.5 pm to
2.0 pm in diameter with uneven, 1 pm to 2 pm wide
ridges separating them. The whole surface is uneven, con-
sisting of irregular, juxtaposed granules.
Sporangial width showed a greater degree of variation
than sporangial length with 60% of the sporangia from
the Cape measuring between 372 pm and 418 pm and
78% of the sporangia from the Transvaal sample ranged
from 442 pm to 512 pm wide.
When length and width of individual sporangia were
plotted (Figure 2B) the scattergram revealed only a min-
imal amount of overlap between the two populations.
The systematic potential of spores with respect to size
and spore morphology has long been recognised (Wood
1973). Differences in spore size in the two Schizaeci
samples could indicate a difference in ploidy between the
two populations. Tryon & Lugardon (1991) found spores
of diploid Polystichum Roth species to have smaller
spores than tetraploids but they also found that spores
from disjunct populations of Thelypteris palustris showed
significant variation in size. It will be necessary to inves-
tigate the ploidy of the two populations and also to sample
populations from the entire distribution range before the
full significance of the present findings may be assessed.
TABLE 2. — Statistical analysis of spore and sporangial size in S. pec-
tinata (pm). For pairs of data within columns p< <0.01 % by two
sample t test
The differences in exospore structure could be the
result of the differences in the habitats of the two popula-
tions sampled. It has been suggested that the surface com-
plexity of spores of Pyrrosia Mirb. and Asplenium L. may
135
130
125
120
115
f 110
i 105
o>
i ioo
95
90
85
80
O
O
o
o ©
o
+ Cape spores
O Transvaal spores
50 55 60 65 70 75 80
Width in pm
Cape sporangia
Transvaal sporangia
FIGURE 2. — Scattergrams derived from measurements of 5. pectinata.
A, spore size; B, sporangial size.
206
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
FIGURE 3. — Comparison of spore
size and features of outer exo-
spore sculpturing in S. pec-
tinata. A, C, spore surface of
Transvaal material; some of
surface debris is a preparation
artefact. B, D, spore surface of
Cape material; surface debris
consists of spherical particles
which may be associated with
early development of inner
perispore. Scale bars: A, B, 10
pm; C, D, 2 pm.
be related to ecological specialisations, i.e. whether the
plants are epiphytic, lithophytic etc. (Tryon 1990). Plants
of S. pectinate i at both sites were terrestrial. Correlations
between spore morphology and overall morphology in the
Thelypteridaceae have been shown to follow the
taxonomic groupings of other authors based on purely
morphological grounds (Wood 1973). However, since
there have been few studies on the ultrastructure of the
exospore in this genus or in the ferns as a whole, it is
difficult to assess the taxonomic significance of the varia-
tion in exospore structure in S. pectinata without further
study.
Formation of the inner perispore
In the spores from both the Cape and the Transvaal,
the inner perispore consisted of a darkly staining, discon-
tinuous and heterogeneous layer which was laid down on
the ornamented surface of the outer exospore. In the
material from the Cape (Figures 4B; 5A) the deposition
of the inner perispore was associated with dense,
heterogeneous spherical bodies. In the spores from the
Transvaal at the same stage of development (Figure 4A)
coiled structures were found in close proximity to the
developing inner perispore. There is some evidence
(Parkinson 1991) that these bodies are derived, at least in
part, from the plasmodial tapetum which disappears at
about this time. They are thought to contain some
sporopollenin as the perispore has been shown to be
acetolysis resistant (Parkinson 1991 ). These structures also
differ structurally and functionally from the spheroids in
Psilotum nudum (L.) P. Beauv. (Parkinson 1988) and
spherical structures in 5. pectinata (Figure 5B) termed
composite bodies (Parkinson 1990) which are present
during the formation of the outer perispore. I suggest that
the coiled and dense bodies are vehicles for the transport
of materials, particularly sporopollenin or its precursors,
from the plasmodial tapetum to the developing inner
perispore.
Outer perispore
The junction between the inner and outer perispore
layers was clearly demarcated in section, by an electron
lucent area. The inner perispore was a narrow, darkly
staining, heterogeneous layer, whereas the outer perispore
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
207
FIGURE 4. — Structures associated with the formation of inner perispore in S. pectinata. A, section through part of spore wall of Transvaal
material. Sculptured outer exospore (E) with deep indentations, covered by narrow, heterogeneous layer of greater electron density, the
inner perispore. Large bodies (arrowed) have convoluted or coiled appearance. Smaller globules (arrow-heads) found attached to or close
to developing spore wall. B, section through part of spore wall of Cape material. Sculpturing of outer exospore (E) with shallowly rounded
projections covered by narrow, heterogeneous layer of greater electron density, the developing inner perispore. Spherical bodies ( arrowed)
dense, but show some substructure or heterogeneity and are attached to developing spore wall. Scale bars: A. B. 0.5 pm.
FIGURE 5. — A, rounded protrusions of outer exospore (E) of spore from Cape material during development of inner perispore. Note large size of
dense bodies in sporangial loculus associated with this development. B, composite bodies from sporangial loculus from Transvaal material
occur during final stages of spore wall development when outer perispore is being deposited. Similar structures also occur in the Cape material.
Scale bars: A, 2 pm; B, 0.5 pm.
208
Bothalia 24,2 ( 1994)
was not so darkly stained and often had a striated ap-
pearance in section (Parkinson 1991). Composite bodies
were associated with its development in both the Cape
and the Transvaal material (Figure 5B). The outer
perispore and the composite bodies were shown to contain
silicon (Parkinson 1990) and phenolics (Parkinson 1992).
The outer perispore was frequently displaced from the un-
derlying layers during handling of the material. There
were no observable differences between the outer
perispore of spores from the Transvaal and the Cape.
The structure of the perispore in ferns and fern allies
has been discussed by Hennipman (1970), Lugardon
(1974), Schraudolf (1984) and Uehara & Kurita (1989a
& b) but the ontogeny of the perispore layer is poorly
known. The dense bodies and the coiled structures
reported here are not the globules scattered on the spore
surface in species with a thin perispore (Lugardon 1981)
and which were regarded as the counterpart of orbicules
or Ubisch bodies in pollen. Fern spores used to be
described as perinous or non-perinous but work at the
electron microscope level (Lugardon 1971, 1974) has
shown that whereas the perine/perispore may be difficult
to detect with light microscopy, genera which were
originally described as being without a perispore have
now been shown to possess this layer. Tryon & Tryon
(1982) called for a re-examination of distinctions between
genera based on the presence or absence of a perispore
and characteristics of its formation and final structure, as
it may be taxonomically important.
Tapetal organisation
Tapetal organisation has been well studied in the an-
giosperms and Goebel (1905) recognised two types of
tapeta, secretory and plasmodial, between which transition
forms occur (Foster & Gifford 1959). The range of tapetal
types and structural variations in the Embryophyta is large
(Pacini, Franchi & Hesse 1985) but there have been few
studies dealing with tapetal ontogeny and structure in the
lower vascular plants.
A detailed, ontogenetic study of the tapetum has been
carried out on S. pectinata from the Cape (Parkinson
1991) and this work will form the basis of a separate
publication (in preparation). Essentially, what has been
determined is that a central, tetrahedral, archesporial initial
cell is responsible for the formation of a tapetal initial
layer. These cells then divide periclinally initiating the for-
mation of an inner and an outer tapetal layer. The inner
layer differentiates into a periplasmodial tapetum as-
sociated with the developing archesporial tissue and the
outer layer differentiates into a cellular, parietal tapetal
layer (Parkinson 1991). A complete ontogenetic study of
FIGURE 6. — Sections through sporangia: A, showing sculptured nature of outer exospore in S. pectinata from Transvaal material. Spores associated
with last remnants of periplasmodial tapetum (arrow-heads). No evidence of cellular, parietal tapetum which would be situated at position
marked by asterisks (*) adjacent to cells of sporangium wall. B, from Cape material. Sculptured outer exospore has developed and spores
associated with periplasmodial tapetum (arrow-heads). Attenuated, cellular, parietal, tapetal layer (*) adjacent to cells of sporangium wall.
Scale bars: A, B, 10 pm.
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
209
the tapetum from material from the Transvaal has not been
completed. In sections through sporangia from the
Transvaal material, at the stage when the outer exospore
was fully developed but perispore development was not
yet complete (Figure 6A), only a periplasmodial tapetum
was present. In sections of the Cape material at the same
stage of development (Figure 6B) both a cellular, parietal
tapetal layer and a periplasmodial tapetum were present.
The presence of a cellular, parietal tapetum and a plas-
modial tapetum existing concurrently in S. pectinata from
the Cape is similar in some respects to the condition pre-
viously reported in Psilotum nudum (Parkinson 1987). The
condition also exists in other members of the Schi-
zaeaceae, namely Anemia phvllitidis (L.) Sw. (Schraudolf
1984) and Lygodium Sw. (Binford 1907), as I have de-
duced from illustrations in these papers. It almost certainly
exists in Schizaea tenella Kaulf. (Parkinson 1991).
There are examples in the literature where a parietal
tapetum breaks down and becomes invasive during later
stages of pollen development as in Pinus banksiana Lamb.
(Dickinson & Bell 1972, 1976) and Beta vulgaris L.
(Hoefert 1971). There are also descriptions of an invasive
but non-syncytial type of plasmodium in Canna L. (Tiwari
& Gunning 1986a, b) which is regarded by these authors
as being intermediate between the secretory and plas-
modial forms. The tapetal condition in S. pectinata from
the Cape is interpreted as being dimorphic (Parkinson
1991) and the present author considers it to be a more
truly transitional form between the secretory and plas-
modial condition than the one described in Canna.
The significance of the differences noted in the condi-
tion existing in the material from the Cape and from the
Transvaal, at the stage when outer exospore development
has been completed, lies in the fact that in studies carried
out on the angiosperms, the timing of events in the
tapetum at specific stages of microspore development is
noted as reflecting family- or genus-specific differences.
The change from one type to another within families or
genera was interpreted as being a significant evolutionary
trend (Pacini, Franchi & Hesse 1985).
CONCLUSIONS
The statistically significant differences in sporangium
and spore size, the differences in the outer exosporal or-
namentation, the differences in the formation of the inner
perispore and the variation in tapetal organisation indicate
that what has always been considered to be a single
species may constitute more than one element. S. pec-
tinata and S. tenella are the only species currently recog-
nised in southern Africa (Sim 1915; Schelpe 1970; Roux
1979; Jacobsen 1983; Schelpe & Anthony 1986; Burrows
1990).
Tapetal origin and form was a basis for suggesting
phylogenetic relationships within members of the
Embryophyta which have been studied more completely,
particularly the angiosperms and gymnosperms (Pacini,
Franchi & Hesse 1985). Tapetal organisation in the ferns
and fern allies may supply information which could be
applied to phylogenetic problems within these groups. It
will be interesting to see whether work by Roux (1992)
on certain Schizaeaceae, particularly Mohria , will support
the present findings based on ultrastructural details.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I wish to thank J.P Roux of the Compton Herbarium,
Kirstenbosch, for reading the first draft of the manuscript,
for useful discussions and for his constructive criticism.
To P. Tshabalala for photographic printing and to M.A.S.
Coetzee for the Afrikaans translation, my sincere thanks.
Grants from the University of the Witwatersrand Research
Committee are gratefully acknowledged.
REFERENCES
ACOCKS, J.P.H. 1988. Veld types of South Africa, 3rd edn. Memoirs of
the Botanical Survey of South Africa No.57.
BINFORD. R. 1907. The development of the sporangium of Lygodium.
Botanical Gazette 44: 214-224.
BURROWS. J.E. 1990. Southern African ferns and fern allies. Frandsen,
Sandton, South Africa.
COLHOUN, C.W. & STEER, M.W. 1981. Microsporogenesis and the
mechanism of cytoplasmic male sterility in maize. Annals of
Botany 48: 417 — 424.
DICKINSON, H.G. & BELL, RR. 1972. The role of the tapetum in the
formation of sporopollenin-containing structures during
microsporogenesis in Pinus banksiana. Planta 107: 205-215.
DICKINSON, H.G. & BELL. P.R. 1976. The changes in the tapetum of
Pinus banksiana accompanying formation and maturation of the
pollen. Annals of Botany 40: 1 101-1 109.
FOSTER, A.S. & GIFFORD, E.M. Jr 1959. Comparative morphology of
vascular plants. Freeman, San Francisco.
GOEBEL. K. 1905. Organography of plants. Part 2. English edn by B.
Balfour, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
HENNIPMAN. E. 1970. Electron and light microscopical observations
on the perine of the spores of some Bolbitis species (Filices). Acta
Botanica Neerlandica 19: 671-680.
HOEFERT, L.L. 1971. Ultrastructure of tapetal cell ontogeny in Beta.
Protoplasma 73: 397^-06.
JACOBSEN, W.B.G. 1983. The ferns and fem allies of southern Africa.
Butterworths, Durban.
LUFT. J.H. 1961. Improvements in epoxy embedding methods. Journal
of Biophysics and Biochemical Cytology 9: 409.
LUGARDON, B. 1971. Contribution a la connaissance de la morpho-
genese et de la structure des parois sporales chez les Filicinees
isosporees. Ph.D. thesis, Universite Paul Sabatier, Toulouse,
France.
LUGARDON, B. 1974. La structure fine de l'exospore et de la perispore
des Filicinees isosporees. II. Filicales. Pollen et Spores 16: 161 —
226.
LUGARDON, B. 1981. Les globules des Filicinees, homologues des
corps d'Ubisch des spermatophytes. Pollen et Spores 23: 93-124.
MACDONALD, I.A.W., CLARK, D.L. & TAYLOR, H.C. 1989. The
history and effects of alien plant control in the Cape of Good Hope
Nature Reserve, 1941-1987. South African Journal of Botany 55:
56-75.
PACINI, E„ FRANCHI, G.G. & HESSE, M. 1985. The tapetum: its form,
function and possible phylogeny in Embryophyta. Plata Svs-
tematics and Evolution 149: 155-185.
PARKER, R.E. 1979. Introductory statistics for biology, 2nd edn. The
Institute of Biology 's Studies in Biology No. 3. Edward Arnold,
U.K.
PARKINSON, B.M. 1987. Tapetal organization during sporogenesis in
Psilotum muium. Anttals of Botany 60: 353-360.
PARKINSON, B.M. 1988. Atapetal membrane in Psilotum nudum (L.) P.
Beauv. Annals of Botany 61 : 695-703.
PARKINSON, B.M. 1990. Silicon detected in the perispore and as-
sociated structures in Schizaea pectinata (Schizaeaceae). Electron
Microscopy Society of Southern Africa Proceedings 20: 87, 88.
PARKINSON, B.M. 1991. An investigation of sporangial development,
sporogenesis and tapetal organisation in Schizaea pectinata (L)
Sw. (Schizaeaceae). Ph.D. thesis, University of the Wit-
watersrand, South Africa.
210
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
PARKINSON, B.M. 1992. The development of the spore wall in Schizaea
pectinata (Schizaeaceae). Electron Microscopy Society of
Southern Africa Proceedings 22: 79, 80.
ROUX, J.P. 1979. Cape Peninsula ferns. National Botanic Gardens of
South Africa, Kirstenbosch. Cape Province, South Africa.
ROUX, J.P. 1992. Systematic studies in the genus Mohria (Pteridophyta:
Anemiaceae) I. Comparative morphology and anatomy of the
rhizome and frond. South African Journal of Botany 58: 83-89.
SCHELPE, E.A.C.L.E. 1970. Pteridophyta. In A.W. Exell & E. Launert,
Flora Zambesiaca. Crown Agents for Oversea Governments and
Administrations, London.
SCHELPE, E.A.C.L.E. & ANTHONY, N.C. 1986. Pteridophyta. In O.A.
Leistner, Flora of southern Africa. Botanical Research Institute,
Department of Agriculture and Water Supply, Pretoria.
SCHRAUDOLF, H. 1984. Ultrastructural events during sporogenesis of
Anemia phyllitidis (L.) Sw. I. Spore wall formation. Beitrage zur
Biologie der Pflanzen 59: 237-260.
SIM, T.R. 1915. The ferns of South Africa , 2nd edn. Cambridge Univer-
sity Press.
TIWARI, S.C. & GUNNING, B.E.S. 1986a. Development of tapetum and
microspores in Canna L.: an example of an invasive but non-syn-
cytial tapetum. Annals of Botany 57: 557-563.
TIWARI, S.C. & GUNNING, B.E.S. 1986b. Development and cell sur-
face of a non-syncytial invasive tapetum in Canna: ultrastructural,
freeze-substitution, cytochemical and immuno-fluorescence
study. Protoplasma 134: 1-16.
TRY ON, A.F. 1990. Fern spores: evolutionary levels and ecological
differentiation. Plant Systematics and Evolution , Supplement 5:
71-79.
TRY ON, A.F. & LUGARDON, B. 1991. Spores of the Pteridophyta.
Springer- Verlag, New York, Heidelberg, Berlin.
TRYON, R.M. & TRYON, A.F. 1982. Ferns and allied plants with
special reference to tropical America. Springer- Verlag, New
York, Heidelberg, Berlin.
UEFLARA, K. & KURITA, S. 1989a. An ultrastructural study of spore
wall morphogenesis in Equisetum arvense. American Journal of
Botany 76: 939-95 1 .
UEFLARA, K. & KURITA, S. 1989b. Ultrastructural study of spore wall
morphogenesis in Ophioglossum thermale Kom. var. nipponicum
(Miyabe et Kudo) Nishida. Botanical Magazine. Tokyo 102: 413-
427.
WOOD, C.C. 1973. Spore morphology in the Thelypteridaceae. Botani-
cal Journal of the Finnean Society 67, Supplement No. 1: 191—
203.
Bothalia 24,2: 211-215(1994)
Plant defences against mammalian herbivores: are juvenile Acacia more
heavily defended than mature trees?
R. BROOKS* and N. OWEN-SMITH*
Keywords: Acacia , browsers, defence, tannins, polyphenols, thorns
ABSTRACT
Juvenile trees are expected to be more heavily defended against browsing mammals than mature plants. Juvenile and mature
trees of Acacia tortilis and A. nilotica occurring at Nylsvley, Northern Transvaal, were quantitatively compared in terms of some
potential chemical and physical defences. Neither species showed any significant difference between juvenile and mature trees
in terms of total polyphenol content, condensed tannin content, protein precipitating ability or protein content in leaves. Both
species showed age-class differences in spinescence. In A. nilotica , thorns on branch tips were longer and more closely spaced
and leaves were smaller in juveniles than in adults. Hence juveniles of this species appear to be physically more heavily
defended than mature plants. In A. tortilis , curved thorns were longer, but straight thorns were shorter than in mature trees. There
was no difference between age classes in overall thorn density, but juveniles had a higher curved to straight thorn ratio. It is not
obvious what the effects of these differences might be on mammalian browsers.
UITTREKSEL
Na verwagting is jong borne beter as volwasse plante teen blaarvretende soogdiere beskerm. Jong en volwasse borne van
Acacia tortilis en A. nilotica by Nylsvley, Noord-Transvaal, is kwantitatief vergelyk in terme van etlike potensiele chemiese en
fisiese verdedigingsmeganismes. Nie een van die spesies het enige beduidende verskil tussen jong en volwasse borne getoon in
terme van totale polifenolinhoud, gekondenseerde tannieninhoud, proteinpresipiteringsvermoe of prote'ieninhoud in blare nie.
Albei spesies het ouderdomsklasverskille in doringagtigheid getoon. By A. nilotica, was dorings op punte van takke langer en
digter opmekaar en blare was kleinerby jong borne as by volwassenes. Dit blyk dus dat jong borne van hierdie spesie fisies beter
beskerm is as volwasse plante. By A. tortilis, was krom dorings langer, maar reguit dorings was korter as in volwasse borne. Daar
was geen verskil in algehele digtheid van dorings tussen ouderdomsklasse nie, maar jong borne het 'n hoer verhouding krom tot
reguit dorings gehad. Dit is nie duidelik wat die uitwerkings van hierdie verskille op soogdierblaarvreters is nie.
INTRODUCTION
Woody plants that are browsed by mammals when still
juvenile may show retarded growth and increased time to
reach reproductive maturity (Bryant et al. 1983; Bryant
et al. 1991b). Hence, woody plant defences against mam-
malian herbivores could be expected to be expressed more
strongly in juveniles than in mature trees (Bryant &
Kuropat 1980; Bryant et al. 1983; Bryant et al. 1991a, b,
c). This has been documented in Alaskan paper birch
( Betula resinifera) browsed by snowshoe hare (Lepits
americanus) (Reichardt et al. 1984) and quaking aspen
(Populus tremuloides) browsed by beaver ( Castor cana-
densis) (Basey et al. 1990). The objective of this study
was to assess whether some potentially defensive traits
were expressed more strongly in juvenile Acacia trees
than in mature trees. No studies comparing anti -herbivore
defences of juvenile and mature Acacia trees have yet
been reported.
Defences can take the form of either chemical com-
pounds or physical stmctures. Chemical defences include
secondary metabolites (Freeland & Janzen 1974; Bryant
& Kuropat 1980; Cooper & Owen-Smith 1985; Cooper
et al. 1988; Bryant et al. 1991c), high fibre contents (Bell
1983) or low nutrient levels (Lundberg & Astrom 1990).
* Department of Zoology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
2050.
MS. received: 1993-09-02.
Physical defences include thorns and spines (Cooper &
Owen-Smith 1986; Milewski et al. 1991).
Polyphenols, including condensed and hydrolysable
tannins are widespread among woody plant species
(Swain 1979) and are commonly implicated as quan-
titative defences against herbivory (Rhoades & Cates
1975; Van Hoven 1984; Cooper & Owen-Smith 1985;
Cooper et al. 1988; Teague 1989b; Du Toit et al. 1990;
Furstenburg & Van Hoven in press). A. tortilis trees have
low amounts of condensed tannins in their leaves,
whereas A. nilotica is relatively high in total polyphenol
content (Cooper & Owen-Smith 1985). Both species are
relatively palatable to browsing ungulates (Owen-Smith
& Cooper 1987).
There is circumstantial evidence for longer thorns
being more effective as defences against browsers than
shorter thorns in several Acacia species (Foster & Dagg
1972; Young 1987; Milewski et al. 1991). Cooper &
Owen-Smith (1986) noted that thorns were more effec-
tive in restricting leaf losses to browsers when leaves
were small. In Acacia karroo , the rate of intake of
browse by goats was positively related to leaf mass per
unit length of shoot (Teague 1989a). Thus leaf size and
thorniness might act together in defence of trees against
browsing ruminants. A. nilotica has paired, straight
thorns, while A. tortilis has both 'hooked' thorns and
straight thorns.
212
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study area was the Nylsvley Nature Reserve in
northern Transvaal, South Africa (24° 39' S, 28° 42' E).
Acacia tortilis and A. nilotica occur in the woodlands
flanking the floodplain and in disturbed sites of former
human habitation (Coetzee et al. 1976; Cooper & Owen-
Smith 1986).
Ten pairs of trees comprising a juvenile and a mature
plant no more than 50 m apart, were sampled for each
species. Sampling was restricted to the disturbed Acacia
woodland, and samples were paired to control for spatial
differences in soil nutrients and browsing pressure. Adult
trees were defined as those showing evidence of reproduc-
tive maturity (i.e. presence of flowers or seed pods). No
trees taller than 1.7 m were considered for the juvenile
class.
All collections took place on two consecutive days in
March 1992, because during late summer all leaves are
mature but not yet senescent. For each plant, leaves were
taken from the terminal 250 mm of five branches on the
northern side of the canopy at a height of between 0.75
and 1.7 m (within the browsing reach of impala and/or
kudu). All leaf collecting took place between 06h00 and
09h00. Leaves of each pair of juvenile and mature trees
were collected consecutively, with no more than 15
minutes between collection for members of any pair, to
eliminate the effects of short time-scale fluctuations in leaf
chemistry. Analysis of leaf nitrogen content provides a
check for differences in leaf age between the juvenile and
mature trees sampled.
Collected leaves were placed in plastic bags, and kept
in a cooler box with ice blocks until the end of the col-
lecting session (maximum 3 hours). At the end of the ses-
sion, leaves were frozen in a deep freeze at - 4° C. They
were kept frozen until used for weighing and extraction
for chemical analysis.
Physical defences
The length of all thorns within 250 mm of the branch
tip on the same branches from which leaves were col-
lected was measured to the nearest millimetre. The density
of thorns was measured by counting the number of thorns
or thorn pairs within 250 mm of the branch tip.
The frozen leaves from each tree were weighed to the
nearest 10 g. From these measurements, the mean fresh
leaf mass for each tree was calculated to give an index
of leaf size for each tree. The leaf matter used in extraction
and for protein analysis (about 2.0 g) was weighed out
from frozen leaf material. Several leaves were later dried
in order to determine the relationship between dry mass
and the mass of fresh leaf material so that chemical
parameters could be reported in terms of ‘percentage of
dry mass’.
Chemical analyses
Phenol ics were extracted according to the method
described by Hagerman (1977). Approximately 2.0 g leaf
matter was frozen with liquid nitrogen and ground in a
mortar. The crushed material was then centrifuged three
times at 2500 rpm using 20 ml of 70% acetone as solvent
in each iteration. The supernatant was poured off each
time and stored at 4° C until needed for chemical analysis.
Condensed tannin content was measured using the acid
butanol assay (Porter et al. 1986). The absorbances at 550
nm were standardised against purified sorghum tannin.
The total polyphenol content was determined using the
Prussian blue assay (Price & Butler 1977). Absorbance
was read at 720 nm. The standard was commercial tannic
acid made up from powder form in the laboratory with
70% acetone.
The protein precipitating ability of the chemicals in the
leaves was determined by means of radial diffusion using
the method described by Hagerman (1977). The diameter
of the ring of precipitated BSA in an agarose gel was
measured, the square of the diameter being proportional
to the amount of tannin in the sample (Hagerman 1977).
Protein content was estimated by determining nitrogen
content by Kjeldahl oxidation using sulphuric acid and a
selenium catalyst (Keeney 1982). The amount of am-
monium in the digest was determined colorimetrically fol-
lowing the method of Cataldo et al. (1975) and absorbance
was read at 655 nm. The absorbances were compared to
a standard curve plotted from the absorbances of dilutions
of an ammonium sulphate solution. Crude protein content
equals 6.25 x nitrogen concentration.
For each species, each variable was compared by
means of a Wilcoxon paired summed-ranks test (Siegel
& Castellan 1989) because it was not possible to confi-
dently assume normality in any of the parameters. The
alpha level of acceptance for significant results was 5 per-
cent. Tests were one-tailed tests of the hypothesis that
juveniles are more heavily defended than mature trees.
RESULTS
Heights of juvenile trees sampled (mean and range)
were as follows: Acacia nilotica 1.24 m (0.89-1.60 m),
A. tortilis 1.16 m (0.79-1.58 m).
Chemical measures
The total polyphenol content of leaves of juvenile A.
nilotica did not differ significantly from that of leaves of
the mature plants (Table 1). The protein precipitating
ability (as measured by radial diffusion) of the extracts
from juvenile and mature A. nilotica did not differ sig-
nificantly, and neither did the protein contents of juvenile
and mature plants. A. nilotica did not show any sign of
containing condensed tannins, in that the extracts did not
turn purple (indicative of condensed tannin) in the acid
butanol test.
The polyphenol and condensed tannin contents for
juvenile A. tortilis trees did not differ significantly from
those of mature plants, nor did crude protein content or
protein precipitating capacity (Table 1).
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
213
TABLE 1. — Comparative levels of potential chemical defences of juvenile and mature Acacia nilotica and A. tortilis. N = 10 trees
A. nilotica A. tortilis
Mean ± S.D. Sig. Mean ± S.D. Sig.
juv., juvenile; mat., mature; sig., significance.
Physical parameters
Thoms of juvenile A. nilotica were significantly longer
(P = 0.042) than those of mature trees (Table 2). The
thorns of juveniles were, on average one and a half times
as densely spaced as those of mature trees due to shorter
intemode lengths (P = 0.003). Leaves of juvenile A.
nilotica weighed only 75 % of the mass of those of mature
trees (P = 0.003).
Comparison of the physical defences of juvenile and
mature A. tortilis trees was complicated by the fact that
this species bears both short, recurved ('hooked’ or
'curved') thorns and long, ‘straight’ thorns. The overall
density of thorns on juvenile trees did not differ sig-
nificantly from that on mature trees (Table 2).
The ratio of straight to curved thorns was significantly
higher in juveniles (P = 0.016) than in mature plants.
Curved thorns were significantly longer on juvenile than
on mature trees (P = 0.003), whereas straight thorns were
longer on mature trees than on juveniles (P = 0.05). Leaf
mass did not differ significantly between juveniles and
mature trees of this species.
DISCUSSION
Chemical defence
The results of this study indicate that for both Acacia
nilotica and A. tortilis , juvenile plants did not differ from
those of adult trees in total polyphenol, condensed tannin
or crude protein content. Hence juveniles of these two
Acacia species did not appear to be more heavily defended
chemically, at least at the time of year when samples were
collected. This is in contrast to the findings of Reichardt
et al. (1984) with regard to surface resins on twigs of
paper birch. This may be related to differences in the way
leaves and twigs are defended. Bryant et al. (1992: 345)
note that 'In every case that has been studied, the low
palatability of the juvenile phase has been related to in-
creased concentrations of antifeedants in inte modes ’ (our
emphasis).
Carbon-based secondary metabolites, such as tannins,
would be costly defences during periods of rapid growth
such as the juvenile stage (Bryant et al. 1991b, c, 1992).
Juveniles of both of these Acacia species show high in-
trinsic growth rates (Bryant et al. 1989).
It is also possible that polyphenols, condensed tannins
and protein precipitating compounds do not play a defen-
sive role in these species, since Owen-Smith & Cooper
(1987) classed both species as palatable to browsing
ruminants. Our results confirm that A. tortilis has relative-
ly low concentrations of condensed tannins in leaves, and
that A. nilotica has high total polyphenol contents, but no
measureable condensed tannins, as found by Cooper &
Owen-Smith (1985) and Cooper et al. (1988). Further-
more, our findings indicate that despite having a high
polyphenol content, A. nilotica leaf extracts have a protein
precipitating ability that is scarcely higher than that of A.
tortilis. This suggests that the polyphenols found in the
leaves of A. nilotica are mostly not tannins or other protein
binding compounds.
Physical defence
Juvenile A. nilotica specimens have significantly
longer and more densely spaced thorns and their leaves
TABLE 2. — Comparison of potential physical defences in juvenile and mature Acacia nilotica and A. tortilis. N = 10 trees
juv.. juvenile; mat., mature; sig., significance.
214
Bothalia 24,2 ( 1994)
are smaller than those of mature trees. Working in the
same study area. Cooper & Owen-Smith (1986) compared
scrub (< 1 m high) and mature trees of this species in
terms of thorn length and density. They reported thorn
densities of 91 nr1 for scrub and 59 nr1 for trees, which
are very similar to those found for juveniles and mature
trees respectively in this study. However A. nilotica scrub
showed a somewhat shorter mean thorn length (13 mm)
than found for juveniles in this study, and trees had longer
thorns (26 mm) on average than mature plants in this
study. The juvenile plants sampled in this study were
somewhat taller (mean = 1.24 m) than the scrub category
(all individuals less than 1 m) of Cooper & Owen-Smith.
Also, Cooper and Owen-Smith measured thorns over a
longer portion of the branch than the terminal 250 mm
used in this study.
Thoms retard mammalian browsing by restricting bite
size (Cooper & Owen-Smith 1986; Teague 1989a), but
the relative importance of thorn length and thorn density
in defence is not clear. Heavy browsing can induce longer
thorns in regrowth than are seen in unbrowsed plants
(Foster & Dagg 1972; Young 1987; Milewski et al. 1991),
suggesting that longer thorns might be more effective
browsing deterrents. The measurements presented here in-
dicate that juvenile Acacia nilotica are physically better
defended than mature trees only if two conditions hold.
Firstly, it must be shown that greater thorn length and/or
density provides better defence against browsers than
shorter or less dense thorns. Secondly, the pattern shown
by juveniles under one metre in height ( Cooper & Owen-
Smith 1986) must be explained. The smaller leaves of
juveniles in our study may assist in further restricting
feeding rates of browsers.
In A. tortilis, curved thorns are less dense but longer,
and straight thorns more dense but shorter, in juveniles
than in mature trees. Leaf size did not differ between clas-
ses. Curved thorns retard biting rates of kudu and impala
(Cooper & Owen-Smith 1986). The longer, less densely
spaced curved thorns in the juvenile trees do not neces-
sarily indicate heavier juvenile defence because it is not
known how (if at all) the length and density of curved
thorns contribute to their effectiveness as defences. Dif-
ferences in the lengths and relative densities of both thorn
types in Acacia tortilis cannot be said to support an
hypothesis of heavier juvenile defence until the defensive
roles played by the two thorn types is properly understood.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Dr Mary Scholes provided laboratory facilities and ad-
vice regarding laboratory techniques. Wendy Wolhuter
and three anonymous reviewers greatly improved this
manuscript with their suggestions. The Nature Conserva-
tion division of the Transvaal Provincial Administration
gave permission to work in and take samples from the
Nylsvley Nature Reserve. Gary Marnoweck helped with
arrangements at Nylsvley. This study was conducted as a
B.Sc. Honours project (RB) and funding and financial
support was obtained from the Zoology Department of
the University of the Witwatersrand, the Foundation for
Research Development and the University of the Wit-
watersrand senior bursary program.
REFERENCES
BASEY, J.M., JENKINS, S.H. & MILLER, G.C. 1990. Food selection by
beavers in relation to inducible defenses of Populus tremuloides.
Oikos 59: 57-62.
BELL, R.H.V. 1983. The effect of soil nutrient availability on com-
munity structure in African ecosystems. In B.J. Huntley & B.H.
Walker, Ecology of tropical savannas: 193-216. Springer- Ver-
lag, Berlin.
BRYANT, J.R & KUROPAT, P.J. 1980. Selection of winter forage by
subarctic browsing vertebrates: the role of plant chemistry. An-
nual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1 1: 261-285.
BRYANT, J.P., CHAPIN, F.S. & KLEIN, D.R. 1983. Carbon/nutrient
balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos
40: 357-368.
BRYANT, J.P., DANELL, K„ PROVENZA, F„ REICHARDT. P.B.,
CLAUSEN, T.A. & WERNER, R.A. 1991a. Effects of mammal
browsing on the chemistry of deciduous woody plants. In D.W.
Tallanty & M.J. Raupp, Phytochemical induction by herbivores.
Wiley, New York.
BRYANT, J.P., KUROPAT, P.J., COOPER, S.M., FRISBY, K. & OWEN-
SMITH, N. 1989. Resource availability hypothesis of plant an-
tiherbivore defence tested in a South African savanna ecosystem.
Nature 340: 227, 228.
BRYANT, J.P., KUROPAT, P.J., REICHARDT. P.B. & CLAUSEN, T.P
1991b. Controls over the allocation of resources by woody plants
to chemical antiherbivore defense. In T.R. Palo & C.T. Robbins,
Plant defenses against mammalian herbivory. CRC Press, Boca
Raton.
BRYANT, J.P., PROVENZA, F.D., PASTOR, J„ REICHARDT, P.B.,
CLAUSEN, T.P. & DU TOIT, J.T. 1991c. Interactions between
woody plants and browsing mammals mediated by secondary
metabolites. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 22:
431-436.
BRYANT, J.P.. REICHARDT, P.B., CLAUSEN, T.P, PROVENZA, F.D.,
KUROPAT, P.J. 1992. Woody plant-mammal interactions. In
G.A. Rosenthal & M.R. Berenbaum, Herbivores: their interac-
tions with secondary plant metabolites, 2nd edn. Vol. 2: evolution-
ary and ecological processes. Academic Press.
CATALDO, D.A., HAROON, M„ SCHRADER, L.E. & YOUNGS, V.L.
1975. Rapid colorimetric determination of nitrate in plant tissue
by nitration of salicylic acid. In J.M. Anderson & J.S.I. Ingram
1989, Tropical soil biology and fertility: a handbook of methods.
CAB International. Originally in Communication in Soil Science
& Plant Analysis 6: 71-80.
COETZEE, B.J., VAN DER MEULEN, F„ ZWANZIGER, S„ GONSAL-
VES, P. & WEISSER, P.J. 1976. A phytosociological classifica-
tion of the Nylsvley Nature Reserve. Bothalia 12: 137-160.
COOPER, S.M. & OWEN-SMITH, N. 1985. Condensed tannins deter
feeding by browsing ruminants in a South African savanna.
Oecologia 67: 142-146.
COOPER, S.M. & OWEN-SMITH, N. 1986. Effects of plant spinescence
on large mammalian herbivores. Oecologia 68: 446-455.
COOPER, S.M., OWEN-SMITH, N. & BRYANT, J.P. 1988. Foliage
acceptability to browsing ruminants in relation to seasonal chan-
ges in the leaf chemistry of woody plants in a South African
savanna. Oecologia 75: 336-342.
DU TOIT, J.T., BRYANT, J.P. & FRISBY, K. 1990. Regrowth and
palatability of Acacia shoots following pruning by African savan-
na browsers. Ecology 71:1 49- 154.
FOSTER. J.B. & DAGG, A.I. 1972. Notes on the biology of the giraffe.
East African Wildlife Journal 10: 1-16.
FREELAND, W.J., & JANZEN, D.H. 1974. Strategies in herbivory by
mammals: the role of plant secondary compounds. American
Naturalist 1 08: 269-289.
FURSTENBURG, D. 1991. Die invloed van tanniene in plante op die
voedingsekologie van kameelperde Giraffa kamelopardalis. M.Sc.
thesis. University of Pretoria.
FURSTENBURG, D. & VAN HOVEN. W. 1992. Condensed tannin as
anti-defoliate agent against browsing by giraffe in the Kruger
National Park. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 101 A,
2:381-385.
HAGERMAN, A. 1977. Radial diffusion method for determining tannin
in plant extracts. Journal of Chemical Ecology 13: 437^149.
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
215
KEENEY, D.R. 1982. Nitrogen. In A.L. Page, R.H. Miller & D.R.
Keeney, Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. American Society of
Agronomy, Wisconsin.
LUNDBERG, P. & ASTROM, M. 1990. Low nutritive quality as a
defense against optimally foraging herbivores. American
Naturalist 135: 547-562.
MILEWSKI, A.V., YOUNG, T.P. & MADDEN, D. 1991. Thoms as
induced defences: experimental evidence. Oecologia 86: 70-75.
OWEN-SMITH, N. & COOPER, S.M. 1987. Palatability of woody
plants to browsing ruminants in a South African savanna. Ecology
68:319-331.
PRICE, M.L. & BUTLER, L.G. 1977. The prussian blue assay for poly-
phenols. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 25: 1268-1273.
PORTER, L.W., HRS ITCH, J. & CHAN, C. 1986. The conversion of
procyanidins and prodelphinidins to cyanidin and delphinidin.
Phytochemistry 25: 223-230.
REICHARDT, P.B., BRYANT, J.P., CLAUSEN, T.P. & WIELAND, G.D.
1984. Defense of winter-dormant Alaska paper birch against
snowshoe hares. Oecologia 65: 58-69.
RHOADES D.F. & CATES R.G. 1975. Toward a general theory of plant
antiherbivore chemistry. Recent Advances in Plant Phytochemistry
10: 168-213.
SIEGEL, S. & CASTELLAN, N.J. 1989. Nonparametric statistics. Mc-
Graw-Hill, New York.
SWAIN, T. 1979. Tannins and lignins. In G.A. Rosenthal, & D.H. Janzen,
Herbivores: their interactions with secondary plant metabolites:
657-682. Academic Press, New York.
TEAGUE, W.R. 1989a. Patterns of defoliation of Acacia karroo by goats
and changes in tannin levels and in vitro digestibility following
defoliation. Journal of the Grassland Society of Southern Africa
6: 230-235.
TEAGUE, W.R. 1989b. The response of Acacia karroo plants to defolia-
tion of the upper or lower canopy. Journal of the Grassland
Society of Southern Africa 4: 225-229.
VAN HOVEN, W. 1984. Trees’ secret warning system against browsers.
Custos 13: 11-17.
YOUNG, T.P. 1987. Increased thorn length in Acacia drepanolobium —
an induced response to browsing. Oecologia 71 : 436-438.
Bothalia 24,2:217-222(1994)
The saltmarsh vegetation of Langebaan Lagoon
M. O’CALLAGHAN*
Keywords: Langebaan Lagoon, saltmarsh, species distribution, zonation
ABSTRACT
The saltmarshes of Langebaan Lagoon are the most extensive in southern Africa. These marshes, as sampled along six
transects, are described. A general marsh, consisting of three species assemblages, was recognized and elevation above mean sea
level (MSL) is discussed as a probable determinant of species distributions. However, minor variations in species distributions
have been induced by changes in soil characteristics, the effects of wind on inundation depth and differences in water salinity.
UITTREKSEL
Langebaan se soutmoerasse is die mees uitgebreide in suidelike Afrika. Hierdie moerasse, soos bestudeer langs ses
lynopnames, word beskryf. ’n Algemene soutmoeras, bestaande uit drie spesiegroepe, kan herken word. Hoogte bo seevlak
(MSL) is waarskynlik bepalend vir die verspreidingspatrone van spesies. Nietemin kan klein variasies van hierdie patrone
veroorsaak word deur veranderinge in grondeienskappe, die effek van wind op waterdiepte en verskillende watersoutgehaltes.
INTRODUCTION
The saltmarshes of Langebaan Lagoon are the most
extensive in the temperate zone of southern Africa. At
5 700 ha, this Lagoon contains over 30% of South
Africa’s saltmarsh areas (O’Callaghan 1990). Most of the
Langebaan marshes have been protected since 1988 as
part of a nature reserve.
These saltmarshes have developed under unique con-
ditions as there is no riverine flow into the Lagoon. All
other saltmarsh development along the South African
coast occurs in estuaries where salinity and tidal charac-
teristics result from interactions between marine and
riverine water bodies. There is, however, an extensive
fresh water seepage into Langebaan Lagoon at the
southeastern comer (Shannon & Stander 1977) and the
wetland vegetation in this area is different from the true
saltmarshes. These less saline wetlands were excluded
from this study. They have been described by Boucher &
Jarman (1977) and Boucher (1987).
The saltmarshes are integral to the functioning of many
biotic components of the Lagoon [Puttick 1980; Whitfield
et al. 1989; see Christie (1981) for estimates of macro-
phyte production]. The biology of this Lagoon was dis-
cussed in detail at a symposium on the area (Siegfried
1977).
The most extensive development of marshes occurs at
the southern and southeastern parts of the Lagoon. In these
areas, complex channel systems allow water to flow into
large low-lying backshore areas where marshes develop.
The inundation and salinity features of the waters flooding
* Stress Ecology Research Unit, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag
X7, Claremont 7735.
MS. received: 1993-05-06.
these parts are highly variable and the backshore areas
were excluded from this study.
Boucher & Jarman (1977) maintained that the marsh
communities of Langebaan Lagoon can be distinguished
by the presence of Sarcocornia pillansii. They divided the
marshes into Juncus kraussii Dense Sedgelands and
Chenolea-Salicomia Dwarf Succulent Shrublands. The
former describes the fresher water marsh areas and the
latter describes the saltmarshes. Boucher (1987) included
the above data to establish a class of halophytic com-
munities called Sarcocornietea pillansiae, although he
mentioned that the establishment of clear-cut units is
hindered by the low species densities of these commu-
nities. The associations included in this order are slight
modifications of the concepts of Boucher & Jarman
(1977).
Day (1959) briefly described the zonation of saltmar-
shes at Langebaan Lagoon. The top of the marsh is indi-
cated by the presence of Sporobolus virginicus and
terrestrial species which are found at the extreme high
water spring tide level. From this point to MHWS (mean
high water spring), a mixed zone of Salicomia meyeriana,
Limonium scabrum and Chenolea diffusa occurs. Between
MHWS and MHWN (mean high water neap), Sarcocor-
nia perennis and Triglochin bulbosa dominate. Spartina
maritima is found from the bottom of this zone to the top
of the zone which occurs below MSL.
All the descriptions above correlate somewhat. Zostera
capensis grows below MSL, followed by Spartina
maritima. A mixed zone is found up to the MHWS mark,
above which terrestrial species make an appearance. How-
ever, there is some confusion when these patterns are
compared to Boucher’s (1987) communities, particularly
the required presence of Sarcocornia pillansii. The pur-
pose of this paper is describe the marshes of Langebaan
Lagoon in some detail.
218
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
METHODS
After studying aerial photographs, orthophotographic
maps and following field reconnaissance, six transects
were demarcated across the marshes of Langebaan
Lagoon (Figure 1 ). The siting of these transects was deter-
mined subjectively according to variability in species
composition and the relatively undisturbed nature of the
vegetation. Details of these transects are presented in
Table 1 . Elevation profiles of the transects were surveyed
using a theodolite, and at least one point on each transect
was surveyed to sea level.
Sampling took place on four occasions during 1987
(March, June, September and November) in order to in-
clude all bulbous and annual plants. Contiguous 1 x 1 m
plots were laid along each transect. The cover-abundance
of each species within each plot was estimated according
to normal phytosociological methods (Braun-Blanquet
1965). Excessive repetition was avoided by not sampling
plots in which it was deemed that the floristic data were
simply repetitions of data already recorded from adjacent
plots. Taxon names follow Arnold & De Wet (1993) and
voucher specimens are housed at the herbarium of the
National Botanical Institute at Stellenbosch (STE), the Na-
tional Herbarium (PRE) and at the Stress Ecology Re-
search Unit at Kirstenbosch. These voucher specimens are
listed by O’Callaghan (1994a).
As classical Braun-Blanquet values cannot be manipu-
lated mathematically, these values were converted accord-
ing to Table 2. To plot the distribution of species, each
transect was divided into elevation classes of 10 cm. The
converted factors were averaged within each 10 cm class
and further averaged over the four sampling periods. As
some of the species have annual geophytic or hemicryp-
tophytic life cycles, the number next to the species name
indicates the number of times this species was located
through the year. The order in which the species occur
along the transect is primarily determined by its lowest
starting point and secondarily by its termination point
along the elevation gradient.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Species distributions along elevation gradients at Tran-
sects LI to L6 are shown in Figures 2-7.
The zonation patterns at Transects L4 and L5 are con-
sidered to be typical of the saltmarshes at Langebaan
Lagoon, for the following reasons:
1, these profiles were topographically regular with very
few gullies or rapid changes in elevation. The shore ex-
tended gently into the Lagoon without promontories,
rocks or outcrops which could affect currents and tidal
fluctuation;
2, as a result, the species were distributed continuously
along the elevation gradient. At L4, a single specimen of
Puccinellia angusta was found in the mid-marsh during
September, resulting in a split distribution. By November,
this plant had disappeared. At L5, a path existed from 100
cm to 1 20 cm above MSL. This resulted in a split distribu-
tion for Chenolea diffusa. Sheep were removed from the
area towards the end of this year and, by November,
Sarcocornia pillansii and Suaeda inflata had expanded to
cover most of the path;
3, the majority of species shown were present during the
entire year, indicating that environmental conditions were
relatively stable. However, all the species above an eleva-
tion of approximately 80 cm showed signs of grazing at
TABLE I . — Details of transects
Bothalia 24.2(1994)
219
Height above MSL (cm)
FIGURE 2. — Distribution of species along an elevation gradient on
Transect LI. 1-4, number of times species located through the
year.
Othonna perfohata
Senecio littoreus
Oxalis pes-caprae
Trachyandra divancata
Tetragonia fruticosa
Lolium perenne
Atriplex cine re a
Puccinellia angusta
Sporobolus virginicus
Romulea tabulans
Plantago crassifolia
Triglochin striata
Suaeda inflata
Disphyma crassifolium
Sarcocomia pillansii
Salicomia meyeriana
Chenolea diffusa
Juncus kraussii
Limonium depauperatum
Sarcocomia perennis
Zostera capensis
Spartina maritima
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100110120130140
L5. This might have had a differential effect on the
presence of some of the species: a) Puccinellia angusta is
an annual grass which germinates in winter and flowers
by spring. At L4, the dead plants remained in place
throughout the whole year. It was only recorded during
November at L5, once the seeds had germinated in spring;
b) at L5, Limonium depauperatum was not recorded in
March. The growth form of L. depauperatum (a single
stem growing higher than the surrounding vegetation) is
such that it would have been most affected by grazing. This
species was again evident from June onwards.
The distribution of species along these two transects
will be discussed first and the other transects will be re-
lated to them.
Transects L4 and L5 (Figures 5 & 6)
Height above MSL (cm)
FIGURE 3. — Distribution of species along an elevation gradient on
Transect L2. 1-4, number of times species located through the
year.
1, the lower assemblage ( Zostera capensis, Spartina
maritima)', from well below MSL to MHWN;
2, the middle assemblage (Triglochin bulbosa, Sarcocor-
nia perennis , up to Limonium depauperatum, Chenolea
diffusa)',
3, the upper assemblage ( Suaeda inflata, Sarcocomia
pillansii, Disphyma crassifolium and others).
Although this terminology is similar to that of Chap-
man (1976, 1977), Beeftink (1977), Adam (1978, 1981),
and others, it does not correspond with their concepts of
Three groups of species could be distinguished in these
transects:
TABLE 2. — Conversion factors
Height above MSL (cm)
FIGURE 4. — Distribution of species along an elevation gradient on
Transect L3. 3, 4, number of times species located through the
year.
220
Bothalia 24,2 ( 1994)
Tetragonia fruticosa
Spergularia media
Disphyma crassifolium
Drosanthemum delicatulum
Puccinellia angusta
Sarcocornia pillansii
Suaeda inflata
Chenolea diffusa
Limonium depauperatum
Salicomia meyeriana
Triglochin bulbosa
Sarcocornia perenms
Spariina maritima
Zostera capensis
4
4
4
4
k
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100110120130140
Height above MSL (cm)
FIGURE 5. — Distribution of species along an elevation gradient on
Transect L4. 1-4, number of times species located through year.
Height above MSL (cm)
FIGURE 7. — Distribution of species along an elevation gradient on
Transect L6. 1-4, number of times species located through year.
lower, mid and upper marshes. In the present paper, these
divisions are used only to facilitate discussion.
In relation to L5, the upper limits of Spartina maritima
and Salicomia meyeriana and the lower limits of Salicor-
nia meyeriana and Suaeda inflata were extended at L4.
These extensions are evident between the elevations of
60 cm and 100 cm. This phenomenon can be explained
if the extensions are regarded as a tendency towards in-
version rather than simply a displacement of species boun-
daries.
Two examples of inversion were noted at L5. The posi-
tions of Triglochin bulbosa and Sarcocornia perennis were
inverted and Limonium depauperatum and Chenolea dif-
fusa were inverted relative to the other transects. At L4,
Sarcocornia pillansii and Suaeda inflata on the upper part
of the transect were inverted.
Height above MSL (cm)
FIGURE 6. — -Distribution of species along an elevation gradient on
Transect L5. 1-4, number of times species located through year.
Inversion of species occurs when the normal control-
ling factors have been inverted. Figure 8a & b show that
major changes in the relationship between conductivity
and organic carbon take place at 45 cm and 85 cm above
MSL at L5, and at 1 15 cm above MSL at L4. The reasons
Height above MSL (cm)
FIGURE 8. — Conductivity (broken line) and organic carbon (solid line)
of the soils at A, Transect L4 and B, Transect L5.
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
221
for these changed relationships is uncertain, hut they were
observed where the species tended towards inversion.
Transects LI and L3 (Figures 2 & 4)
Relative to L4 and L5, the species distributions were
displaced up the shore by 10 cm at LI and by 60 cm at
L3. This can be accounted for by an interaction between
major currents (Flemming 1977a) and the predominant
southeasterly winds which continuously push the water
high up onto the transect. The effect is more pronounced
at L3 where a sand-spit to the north of the transect traps
the water more readily.
Higher current speeds and coarser substrata along these
western shores (Flemming 1977b) limited the growth of
Zostera capensis. It was only found at L3 from July (i.e.
with the seasonal abatement of the strong southeasterly
winds) and had increased by November. It seems to have
a seasonal or cyclical occurrence in this area. Furthermore,
it was found relatively high on the marsh where some
protection and possibly fine organic substrate was
provided by Spartina maritima.
The presence of Sarcocomia littorea at LI is unusual
(Tolken 1967). This species usually grows in cracks and
crevices on rocky marine shores, just above extreme high
water. On such a rocky shore, the species would seldom
be inundated, but would often be exposed to salt spray.
The soils would be coarse with little organic content. The
upper layers of the soil would be well aerated, but deeper
root development would be limited. At LI, this species
was found on a mound above MHWS, but low down on
the transect. It would have been exposed to salt spray
from the southeasterly winds. It occurred on coarse sands,
but soil depth would be limited by a high water table. It
could be speculated that the conditions under which this
species was found on this transect were similar to those
under which it normally grows on rocky shores.
More than half the species above the level of Suaeda
inflata at LI had an annual life cycle. Cotula eckloniana
first appeared in June, Crassula decumbens and Senecio
littoreus appeared in September. These three species are
often found after spring and summer draw-downs in
fresher water pans (pers. obs.). Heavy winter rains could
briefly freshen the heavy soils of the upper parts of LI.
As these species appeared above HAT, the environment
could have briefly simulated fresher water pans.
The species at the top of LI are often found on ter-
restrial arid and/or salinized soils.
Transects L2 and L6 (Figures 3 & 7)
Much of the saltmarsh development along the eastern
shores of the Lagoon was similar to that already described.
However, seepage of fresh water into the Lagoon was an
added factor influencing the vegetation, particularly at L2
and L6.
Juncus kraussii was found in depressions near the top
of L2 where occasional incoming saline water was diluted
by a high terrestrial water table. Fresh water seeps into
the Lagoon immediately north of L6 ( Boucher & Jarman
1977; Boucher 1987). This fresher water floods L6 during
parts of the year, supporting the growth of Schoenoplectus
triqueter and restricting Spartina maritima to a narrow
fringe higher up the marsh.
Juncus kraussii can survive in two distinct habitats: ( 1 )
around fresh water pans and wetlands (e.g. Kleinmond
Lagoon, pers. obs.); and (2) on upper tidal marshes where
salinities rarely exceed 20 %c (e.g. Bree River, O’Cal-
laghan 1983). Although it prefers medium to low
salinities, it can withstand occasional inundation by saline
water. This species was found at 80 cm and again at 120
cm at L6. Conditions at the lower distribution might be
interpreted as habitat 1 whereas conditions at the upper
distribution might be similar to those in habitat 2. This
split in the distribution of Juncus kraussii was also noted
at the Berg River (pers. obs.).
CONCLUSIONS
A number of species recorded by Boucher (1987) were
not found during the present study (. Umonium equisetinum;
Diplachne fusca, Boucher 2820: Drosanthemum floribunda).
Some of these inconsistencies are due to differences in
species concept (e.g. Drosanthemum floribunda and D.
delicatida). However, some of the differences might be due
to different sampling scales used in the different studies.
Diplachne fusca , for example, is usually found in less saline
areas (Kleinmond Lagoon, O’ Callaghan 1994b). It is unlike-
ly to be found in the saltmarshes per se at Langebaan
Lagoon. But it might have been found in the fresher marshes
north of L6. The less intensive but larger scale sampling
techniques used by Boucher & Jarman (1977) and Boucher
(1987) might have resulted in an erroneous inclusion of this
species in the saline marshes.
With minor specific variations, the present description
of the saltmarshes around Langebaan Lagoon corresponds
well with those presented by Day (1959) and Macnae
(1957), but not with Grindley’s description of saltmarshes
at Knysna Lagoon (1985).
However, variations in the relative distributions of the
species can be brought about by an instability in the
relationship between environmental controlling factors.
Further investigation is required, especially as these areas
are often exposed to other disturbances such as the deposi-
tion of wracks and trampling. Although there was some
evidence of direct human-induced disturbance (e.g. graz-
ing and trampling), this disturbance is relatively minor
and should decrease as much of the area is managed as
part of the West Coast Nature Reserve.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I thank all local authorities and private land owners
for access and comments; also, the National Botanical In-
stitute, The Botany Departments of the University of Cape
Town and the University of Stellenbosch, especially Dr
C. Boucher.
222
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
REFERENCES
ADAM, P. 1978. Geographical variation in British saltmarsh vegetation.
Journal of Ecology 66: 339-366.
ADAM, P. 1981. The vegetation of British (UK) salt marshes. New
Phytologist 87: 615-629.
ARNOLD, T.H. & DE WET, B.C. (eds) 1993. Plants of southern Africa:
names and distribution. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South
Africa No. 62. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria.
BEEFTINK, W.G. 1977. The coastal marshes of western and northern
Europe: an ecological and phytosociological approach. In V.J Chap-
man, Wet coastal ecosystems : 109-155. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
BOUCHER, C. 1987. A phytosociological study of transects through the
western Cape coastal foreland. South Africa. Ph.D. thesis.
University of Stellenbosch.
BOUCHER, C. & JARMAN, M.L. 1977. The vegetation of the Lan-
gebaan area. South Africa. Transactions of the Royal Society of
South Africa 42: 241-272.
BRAUN-BLANQUET, J. 1 965. Plant sociology — the study of plant com-
munities (translated, revised and edited by D.C. Fuller & H.S.
Conrad). Hafner, London.
CHAPMAN, V.J. 1976. Coastal vegetation. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
CHAPMAN, V.J. 1977. Introduction. In V.J. Chapman, Wet coastal
ecosystems: 1-39. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
CHRISTIE, N.D. 1981. Primary production in Langebaan Lagoon. In
J.H. Day, Estuarine ecology with particular reference to South
Africa : 101-115. Balkema, Cape Town.
DAY, J.H. 1959. The biology of Langebaan Lagoon: a study of the effect
of shelter from wave action. Transactions of the Royal Society of
South Africa 35: 475-547.
FLEMMING, B.W. 1977a. Depositional processes in Saldanha Bay and
Langebaan Lagoon. PhD. thesis, University of Cape Town.
FLEMMING, B.W. 1977b. Distribution of recent sediments in Saldanha
Bay and Langebaan Lagoon. Transactions of the Royal Society of
South Africa 42: 317-340.
GRINDLEY, J.R. 1 985. Estuaries of the Cape. Part II: synopses of avail-
able information on individual systems. In A.E.F. Heydorn & J.R.
Grindley, Report No. 30: Knysna (CMS 13). CSIR Research
Report No. 429.
MACNAE, W. 1957. The ecology of plants and animals in the intertidal
regions of the Zwartkops estuary near Port Elizabeth, South
Africa. Part 1 . Journal of Ecology 45: 113-131.
O’CALLAGHAN, M. 1983. Flora. In R.A. Carter, Estuaries of the Cape.
Part II: synopses of available information on individual systems.
In A.E.F Heydorn & J.R. Grindley, Report No. 21: Bree (CSW
22): 22-24. CSIR Research Report No. 420.
O’CALLAGHAN, M. 1990. Salt marshes — a highly specialized environ-
ment. Custos 1 8: 59, 60.
O’CALLAGHAN, M. 1994a. Salt marshes of the Cape (South Africa):
vegetation dynamics and interactions. Ph.D. thesis, University of
Stellenbosch.
O’CALLAGHAN, M. 1 994b. The saltmarsh vegetation of the lower Berg
River. Botludia 24: 223-228.
PUTTICK, G.M. 1980. Energy budgets of curlew sandpipers at Lan-
gebaan Lagoon, South Africa. Estuarine and Coastal Marine
Science 11: 207-215.
SHANNON, L.V. & STANDER, G.H. 1977. Physical and chemical
characteristics of the water in Saldanha Bay and Langebaan
Lagoon. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 42:
441-459.
SIEGFRIED, W.R. (ed.) 1977. The proceedings of a symposium on research
in the natural sciences at Saldanha Bay and Langebaan Lagoon.
Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 42: 209-509.
TOLKEN, H.R. 1967. The species of Arthrocnemum and Salicomia
(Chenopodiaceae) in South Africa. Bothalia 9: 255-307.
WHITFIELD. A.K., BECKLEY, L.E., BENNETT, B.A., BRANCH, G.M.,
POTTER, I.C. & VAN DER ELST, R.P. 1989. Composition, species
richness and similarity of Ichthyofauna in eelgrass Zostera capensis
beds of southern Africa. South African Journal of Marine Science 8:
251-259.
Bothalia 24,2: 223-228 ( 1 994)
The saltmarsh vegetation of the lower Berg River
M. O’CALLAGHAN*
Keywords: Berg River, saltmarsh, species distribution, zonation
ABSTRACT
The lower Berg River supports approximately 250 ha of estuarine saltmarsh vegetation. Species distribution patterns, as
sampled along six transects, are described. Elevation above mean sea level (MSL) is proposed as a strong determinant of these
patterns. However, there are no typical patterns. The patchy and irregular distribution patterns possibly result from an
inconsistent relationship between species distribution and salinity, tidal inundation and/or competitive interactions.
UITTREKSEL
Die benede Bergrivier onderhou sowat 250 ha soutmoerasplantegroei. Die spesieverspreidingspatrone, soos bemonster
langs ses lynopnames, word beskryf. Hoogte bo seevlak (MSL) word voorgestel as 'n sterk bepalende faktor van hierdie patrone,
maar tipiese patrone kan nie by hierdie rivier bepaal word nie. Hierdie onsamehangende patrone is moontlik die gevolg van 'n
onreelmatige verband tussen die spesieverspreiding en soutgehalte, getyvloeding en/of kompetisie.
INTRODUCTION
Much anthropogenic development has taken place
around the lower Berg River. The effects that these
developments have had on the marshes vary from total
destruction (e.g. the development of housing and
saltworks), through partial destruction (e.g. the dumping
of dredge spoil) to subtle effects brought about by altered
tidal and flow patterns with the construction of dams in
the catchment and the manipulation of the river mouth to
allow access to fishing boats. Nevertheless, Anderson
(1991) estimates that the marshes have decreased by only
13% from 1938 to 1986. Unfortunately, he does not dis-
tinguish between saltmarshes and reed beds. Saltmarshes
currently cover approximately 250 ha around this estuary
which constitutes just less than 2% of the saltmarshes of
southern Africa.
The Berg River is one of the largest rivers on the
western Cape coast (Day 1981) and numerous aspects of
its ecology have been investigated (Harrison 1958a & b,
1974; Harrison & Elsworth 1958; Scott 1958; Ratte 1976,
1977; Coetzer 1976, 1978; Summers et al. 1976; Gaigher
1979). However, apart from superficial descriptions by
Giliomee (1973), Day (1981) and Van Wyk (1983), very
little information concerning the saltmarsh vegetation is
available. These saltmarshes are increasingly being
threatened by the expansion and further development of
recreational, housing and water storage (McDowell 1992,
1993). This investigation aims to describe the floristic
structure of the saltmarshes around the lower Berg River
estuary.
* Stress Ecology Research Unit, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag
X7, Claremont 7735.
MS. received: 1993-05-06.
METHODS
After studying aerial photographs, orthophotographic
maps and following field reconnaissance, six transects
were demarcated across the marshes of the lower Berg
River (Figure 1). The siting of these transects was deter-
mined subjectively according to variability in species
composition and the relatively undisturbed nature of the
vegetation. Details of these transects are presented in
Table 1. Elevation profiles of the transects were surveyed
using a theodolite, and at least one point on each transect
was surveyed to sea level.
Sampling took place on four occasions during 1987
(March, June, September and November) in order to in-
clude all bulbous and annual plants. Contiguous 1 x I m
plots were laid along each transect. The cover-abundance
of each species within the plots was estimated according
to normal phytosociological methods (Braun-Blanquet
1965). Excessive repetition was avoided by not sampling
plots in which it was deemed that the floristic data were
simply repetitions of data already recorded from adjacent
plots. Taxon names follow Arnold & De Wet (1993) and
FIGURE 1. — Berg River. Transects B1 to B6.
224
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
TABLE 1. — Details of transects
voucher specimens are housed at the herbarium of the
National Botanical Institute at Stellenbosch (STE), the Na-
tional Herbarium (PRE) and at the Stress Ecology Re-
search Unit at Kirstenbosch. These voucher specimens are
listed by O’Callaghan (1994a). Aerial photographs are
housed at the CSIR at Stellenbosch.
As classical Braun-Blanquet values cannot be manipu-
lated mathematically, these values were converted accord-
ing to Table 2. To plot the distribution of species, each
transect was divided into elevation classes of 10 cm. The
converted factors were averaged within each 10 cm class
and further averaged over the four sampling periods. As
some of the species have annual geophytic or hemicryp-
tophytic life-cycles, the number next to the species name
on Figures 2 to 7 indicates the number of times this
species was located through the year. The order in which
the species occur along the transect is primarily deter-
mined by its lowest starting point and secondarily by its
termination point along the elevation gradient.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The distribution of species along elevation gradients
on Transects B1 to B6 is shown in Figures 2-7.
Transects B1 and B6 (Figures 2 & 7)
Aerial photographs reveal great variability in the dis-
tribution of saltmarshes in the Blind Lagoon area (Tran-
sects B1 & B6). In 1942 (Job No. 168; Photo No. 38133),
the marshes in this area consisted of disjunct patches with
some submerged macrophytes (probably Zostera capen-
sis ). By 1960 (Job No. 137; Photo No. 5110 & 5111), the
marshes were greatly reduced and there is no evidence of
TABLE 2. — Conversion factors
submerged macrophytes. This reduction might be related
to extensive dredging activities in this area to keep the
channel navigable to fishing trawlers before the current
artificial mouth had been created.
By 1971 (Job No. 675; Photo No. 137 & 138), the
new mouth had been open for five years. The old mouth
had already closed (forming the Blind Lagoon) and much
sediment had been deposited, especially along the north-
ern shore of the lagoon. Patches of saltmarsh had again
developed along this shore.
Height above MSL (cm)
FIGURE 2. — Distribution of species along an elevation gradient on
Transect B 1 . 1-4, number of times species was located through
the year
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
225
Sarcocomia pillansii
X S. perennis
Saticomia meyeriana
Limonium depauperatum
Juncus kraussii
Scirpus venustulus
Chenolea diffusa
Triglochin bulbosa
Sarcocomia perennis
Triglochin striata
Cotula coronopifolia
Schoenoplectus triqueter
Height above MSL (cm)
FIGURE 3. — Distribution of species along an elevation gradient on
Transect B2. 3, 4, number of times species was located through
the year.
Evidence of continued sediment deposition can be seen
on the photographs of 1977 (Job No. 326; Photo No.
1016/5). A saltmarsh cliff had developed at Transect B6
and the marshes at B1 were now recognizable. Photo-
Crassula glomerata
Crassula natans
Cotula eckloniana
Senecio littoreus
Cotula filifolia
Puccineitia angusta
Sarcocomia pillansii
Sporobolus virginicus
Romulea tabularis
Sarcocomia pillansii
X S perennis
Salicomia meyeriana
Spartina maritima
Juncus kraussii
Limonium depauperatum
Chenolea diffusa
Triglochin bulbosa
Thglochin stnata
Cotula coronopifolia
Sarcocomia perennis
Zostera capensis
Height above MSL (cm)
FIGURE 4. — Distribution of species along an elevation gradient on
Transect B3. 1 — 4. number of times species was located through
the year.
Height above MSL (cm)
FIGURE 5. — Distribution of species along an elevation gradient on
Transect B4. l^t, number of times species was located through
the year.
graphs of 1981 (Job No. 376; Photo No. 628) and 1986
(Job No. 892; Photo No. 5553 & 5667) show increasing
sedimentation and an increasing development of saltmar-
shes, especially along the southern shores of the Blind
Lagoon. This might be due to the dumping of dredge spoil
on the marshes opposite Laaiplek (Van Wyk 1983) and/or
the recent dredging activities at Port Owen (since the late
1970s).
The distribution of species on the lower parts of Tran-
sect B6 was similar to the distribution patterns observed
at Langebaan Lagoon (O' Callaghan 1994b), with Zostera
capensis, Spartina maritima, Sarcocomia perennis, Tri-
glochin bulbosa, Sarcocomia pillansii (x S. perennis),
Limonium depauperatum and Sporobolus virginicus. The
presence of Triglochin striata and Romulea tabularis , as
well as Cotula eckloniana and Crassula glomerata on the
upper parts indicates that salinities in this area decreased
to below that of sea water, at least during late winter. The
226
Bothalia 24,2 ( 1994)
Puccinellia angusta
Crassula natans
Romulea tabularis
Salicornia meyeriana
Cotuta coronopifolia
Cotula filifolia
Cotuta eckloniana
Isolepis cemua
Triglochin bulbosa
Sarcocomia perennis
Sarcocomia pillansii
Juncus kraussii
Triglochin striata
Bulboschoenus maritimus
Potamogeton pectinatus
Phragmites australis
Height above MSL (cm)
FIGURE 6. — Distribution of species along an elevation gradient on
Transect B5. 1-4, number of times species was located through
the year.
At B3, the elevational distributions of most species
overlapped somewhat. Zostera capensis was found in a
large creek which crossed the marsh. Juncus kraussii and
Spartina maritima were found near a smaller creek where
the soils were almost constantly waterlogged. The
saltmarsh at B3 can be roughly divided into four sections:
1 , the deeper creeks containing Zostera capensis;
2, the zone from Sarcocomia perennis to Limonium
depauperatum constituted 90% of the remaining spatial
distribution of the marsh. These areas were flooded rela-
tively frequently, usually from water entering and leaving
via creeks;
3, the Juncus/Spartina zone was found near a smaller
creek where the soils were almost constantly waterlogged;
4, the remainder of the marsh constituted less than 10% of
the spatial area of this transect. It was characterized by
Salicornia meyeriana and, except for Sarcocomia pillan-
sii (x S. perennis), contained only annual species. These
upper areas are seldom flooded, although the soils were
rather saline. The top of the transect had been disturbed by
residential developments and was largely devoid of
vegetation except after rains, during spring.
The physiographic structure of the marsh at B2 was
similar to B3. Again, the lower part of the transect (from
Schoenoplectus triqueter to Limonium depauperatum)
constituted more than 90% of the spatial distribution of
this transect and elevational distribution of most species
overlapped. Numerous creeks of varying size traversed
this transect, but none were developed to a depth able to
support Zostera capensis. The soils of B2 seemed to be
somewhat wetter than at B3, but the flooding waters were
less saline. This decreased salinity was confirmed by the
presence of S. triqueter, Triglochin striata, Scirpus venus-
tulus and Juncus kraussii.
species on the top of the transect indicate a moist dune
environment which abuts onto the marsh.
The rate of elevational increase at Transect B1 was
greater than at B6 (5.15 cm/m for Bl; 3.62 cm/m for B6).
The marshes at Bl are also younger, dating from 1966 at
the earliest. The distinction between the marsh vegetation
and adjacent terrestrial vegetation was not as clear as at
B6.
At B 1 , Zostera capensis was found to ± 53 cm below
MSL, especially during summer. From - 50 cm to 63 cm,
no angiospermous vegetation was present. These mud flats
were rich in microflora and filamentous green algae, espe-
cially during early summer.
Transects B2 and B3 (Figures 3 & 4)
A saltmarsh cliff limited the development of the lower
marsh at both these transects. The area immediately above
this cliff was slightly elevated compared with the rest of
the marsh. This would impede the drainage and a number
of creeks of varying size traversed the marsh. With the
exception of these creeks, the marsh consisted of flat ex-
panses with little variation in elevation. Under these con-
ditions, the distribution of the species tended to form
patches and seemed to be related to soil drainage charac-
teristics, rather than to changes in elevation alone.
The upper part of B2 had been disturbed by the
development of the Salt Works evaporation pans. The soils
were highly saline in summer and vegetation was sparse
Height above MSL (cm)
FIGURE 7. — Distribution of species along an elevation gradient on
Transect B6. 1-4, number of times species was located through
the year.
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
227
(Sarcocornia pillansii x S. perennis and Salicomia
meyeriana) or absent.
Transect B4 (Figure 5)
The effects of fresher water inputs were more evident
at this transect. Schoenoplectus triqueter and Juncus
kraussii were found in a large creek which crossed the
marsh. Zostera capensis survived at the riverine end of
this transect throughout the year, but disappeared from the
large creek during spring when fresher waters after the
rainy season would limit its growth. Other species which
were supported by the lowered salinities include Crassula
natans, Samolus porosus and Juncus scabriusculus.
Juncus kraussii covers more than 90% of the spatial
area of B4 and Schoenoplectus triqueter covers more than
70%, often forming dense monospecific stands. The dis-
tribution of some species usually found in more saline
marshes (as at B6) did not overlap with the distributions
of Juncus kraussii and S. triqueter. However, Chenolea
diffusa and Sarcocornia pillansii occurred in association
with the sedges as well as with more salt-tolerant species.
It seems that these taller sedges have a selective competi-
tive effect on the distribution of other species.
The distribution patterns of the more salt-tolerant
species were somewhat irregular. Species co-occurring
with the taller sedges were lanky and required the sedges
for mechanical support.
Although elevation decreased towards the top of this
transect, relatively high water would be required to over-
top the surrounding higher lying areas. This upper end
would therefore be flooded only occasionally by relatively
fresh water during the rainy season. A number of grasses
and herbs were found here ( Polypogon monspeliensis,
Sporobolus virginicus, Disphyma crassifolium, Plantago
crassifolia ), reminiscent of the upper extremes of a marsh
with a more regular elevation gradient.
Transect B5 (Figure 6)
This transect starts at a creek which traversed the marsh
south of Velddrif. The banks of this creek were lined with
Phragmites australis. The bottom of this creek, which is
not included in Figure 6, was constantly filled with fresher
water in which Potamogeton pectinatus was found. The
P. pectinatus indicated in Figure 6 occurred in a depres-
sion which is seasonally flooded with rain water.
Most of this transect was dominated by Sarcocornia
pillansii. As the area immediately adjacent to the creek
was slightly elevated, riverine water did not often flood
this transect. Furthermore, water which might have
entered the marsh through rain, surface drainage or storm
surges, would not easily drain away. This resulted in rela-
tively saline soils, due to evaporation rather than flooding
by saline water. In areas where the soils were slightly less
saline (e.g. immediately adjacent to the creek), Juncus
kraussii co-dominated with Sarcocornia pillansii. The
remaining species (including most of J. kraussii ) were
concentrically arranged around a depression which was
seasonally filled with rain water. The majority of these
species germinated and grew during spring and died back
by midsummer.
Phragmites australis was again found on the top of the
transect where it was supported by fresh water runoff from
adjacent hard surfaces.
CONCLUSIONS
There was no ‘typical’ saltmarsh at the Berg River. The
marshes in the Blind Lagoon showed the clearest zonation
patterns, whereas the zonation patterns higher up the es-
tuary were not as easily discernible.
The conditions prevailing in the Blind Lagoon were
somewhat different from those in the other parts of the
estuary. There was no unidirectional riverine flow in this
part. Rather, the vegetation was subject only to tidal in-
undation originating from the mouth of the estuary. These
conditions are similar to those found in a marine lagoon,
and the zonation of the vegetation is similar to that of
Langebaan Lagoon (O’Callaghan 1994b).
Unlike Langebaan Lagoon, however, the distribution
patterns of species along the elevation gradients in the
remainder of the Berg River Estuary were not constant,
but somewhat patchy. These inconsistencies could be at-
tributed to a number of factors:
1, the rate of elevational increase was very low as one
moved away from the river channel. The elevations of B 1
and B6 increased by an average of 4.35%. In contrast the
elevations of B2 and B3 increased by an average of 0.11%.
With this relatively flat topography, the flooding and
drainage at a particular point on the marsh was not neces-
sarily directly related to the elevation at that point, but
rather to the elevation relative to the surrounding marsh.
Water could remain dammed in a local depression, result-
ing in a longer period of inundation. A local elevation
would have the opposite result;
2, numerous creeks of varying sizes traversed these mar-
shes, adding to the complexity of inundation pattern ob-
served at any particular point. The water which flooded
the marsh often did not originate from the main river
channel. Usually, the part of the transect adjacent to the
river channel was slightly elevated and flooding occurred
via the creeks or ground water seepage. The inundation
patterns across the marsh were thus rather complex;
3, the fresh water input into the system increased as one
moved up the river. The effects of salinity on the saltmarsh
plants were complex as they varied tidally as well as
seasonally.
These complexities would result in an inconsistent
relationship between salinity and tidal inundation, affect-
ing the relative distribution and competitive abilities of
the various species. These interactions require further in-
vestigation.
The species composition of the marshes did vary ac-
cording to the period of inundation, remembering that the
period of inundation is not necessarily related to elevation
alone. Precise data concerning salinity and inundation
tolerances for each species are not available. In general,
as one moved away from the mouth, sedges and reeds
228
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
started to dominate in less saline conditions and Zostera
capensis was replaced by Potamogeton pectinatus.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I thank all local authorities and private land owners
for access and comments; also, the National Botanical In-
stitute, The Botany Departments of the University of Cape
Town and the University of Stellenbosch, especially Dr
C. Boucher.
REFERENCES
ANDERSON, M. 1991. Morphological and hydrological charac-
terization of the Berg River estuary: a geographical perspective.
B.Sc. (Hon.) Project, Geography Dept, University of Stellen-
bosch.
ARNOLD, T.H. & DE WET, B.S. (eds) 1993. Plants of southern Africa :
names and distribution. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South
Africa No. 62.
BRAUN-BLANQUET, J. 1 965. Plant sociology — the study of plant com-
munities (translated, revised and edited by D.C Fuller & H.S.
Conrad). Hafner, London.
COETZER, A. 1976. Verdere resultate van die waterkwaliteit van die
Bergrivier. Department of Nature and Environmental Conserva-
tion Research Report: Invertebrates: 39^12.
COETZER. A. 1978. The invertebrate fauna and biotic index value of
water quality of the Great Berg River, Western Cape. Journal of
the Limnological Society of South Africa 4: 1-7.
DAY, J.H. 1981. Estuarine ecology with particular reference to South
Africa. Balkema, Cape Town.
GAIGHER, C.M. 1979. A survey of the status of bait organisms in Cape
estuaries. Department of Nature and Environmental Conservation
Research Report: Estuaries: 1-18.
GILIOMEE, J.H. 1973. Potensiaal vir buitelugontspanning van die
benede Bergrivier. M.Sc. thesis. University of Stellenbosch.
HARRISON, A.D. 1958a. Hydrobiological studies on the Great Berg
River, western Cape Province. Part 2. Quantitative studies on
sandy bottoms, notes on tributaries and further information on the
fauna, arranged systematically. Transactions of the Royal Society
of South Africa 35: 227-276.
HARRISON, A.D. 1958b. Hydrobiological studies on the Great Berg
River, western Cape Province. Part 4. The effects of organic
pollution on the fauna of parts of the Great Berg River system and
of the Krom Stream, Stellenbosch. Transactions of the Royal
Society of South Africa 35: 299-330.
HARRISON, A.D. 1974. An ecological survey of the Great Berg River. In
J.H.S. Davis, Ecological studies in South Africa: 143-158. Junk,
The Hague.
HARRISON, A.D. & ELSWORTH, J.F. 1958. Hydrobiological studies
on the Great Berg River, western Cape Province. Part 1. General
description, chemical studies and main features of the fauna and
flora. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 35: 125 —
226.
MCDOWELL, C.R. 1992. Evaluation and impact assessment relating to
vegetation affected by the proposed St Helena Marina develop-
ment, lower Berg River. Unpublished report to the Cape Provin-
cial Administration.
MCDOWELL, C.R. 1993. Vegetation assessment of the Berg River es-
tuary and floodplain with evaluation and likely impacts arising
from proposed upstream water impoundments. Unpublished
report to the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry.
O'CALLAGHAN, M. 1994a. Salt marshes of the Cape (South Africa):
vegetation dynamics and interactions. Ph.D. thesis, University of
Stellenbosch.
O'CALLAGHAN, M. 1994b. The saltmarsh vegetation of Langebaan
Lagoon. Bothalia 24: 217-222.
RATTE, T. W. 1 976. 'n Ondersoek na die kommersiele ontginning van die
harder Liza richardsoni in die Bergrivier. Department of Nature
and Environmental Conservation Report: Fish: 120-132.
RATTE, T.W. 1977. Age and growth of the mullet Mugil richardsoni
(Smith) in the Berg River Estuary. Department of Nature and
Environmental Conservation Report: Estuaries: 45-58.
SCOTT, K.M.F. 1958. Hydrobiological studies on the Great Berg River,
western Cape Province. Part 3. The Chromidae. Transactions of
the Royal Society of South Africa 35: 227-298.
SUMMERS, R.W., PRINGLE, J.S. & COOPER, J. 1976. The status of
coastal waders in the southwestern Cape, South Africa. Western
Cape Wader Study Group, Cape Town.
VAN WYK, A. 1 983. Effects of dredging on the Berg River estuary. M.Sc.
thesis, University of Cape Town.
Bothalia 24,2: 229-233 (1994)
The saltmarsh vegetation of the lower Uilkraals River
M. O’CALLAGHAN*
Keywords: saltmarsh, species distribution, Uilkraals River, zonation
ABSTRACT
Approximately 40 ha of saltmarsh exist around the Uilkraals River. The distribution patterns of species in these marshes are
described and compared with patterns found in other marshes in the Western Cape. The marshes might superficially resemble a
mosaic of species, but each element of the mosaic could be compared with vegetation in other systems. Peculiar salinity and
tidal features are postulated as having a great influence on species distributions at this river.
UITTREKSEL
Daar is ongeveer 40 ha soutmoerasse om die Uilkraalsrivier. Die verspreidingspatrone van spesies in hierdie moerasse word
beskryf en met patrone in ander moerasse in die Wes-Kaap vergelyk. Die moerasse om hierdie rivier lyk oppervlakkig soos 'n
mosaiek van spesies, maar elke element van hierdie mosa'iek kan vergelyk word met die plantegroei in ander stelsels.
Besonderse sout- en getyvariasies word voorgestel as belangrike invloede op die verspreiding van spesies by hierdie rivier.
INTRODUCTION
The Uilkraals River (mouth: 34°36' S; 19°24' E) is
relatively small (Midgely & Pitman 1969; Noble &
Hemens 1978; Heydom & Tinley 1980). The lower parts
are shallow and follow a meandering course across sand
flats before entering the Atlantic Ocean. The mouth does
not close during the dry season as it is partially stabilized
by developments adjacent to the mouth (Heydom & Bick-
erton 1982). These factors combine to result in a some-
what reduced tidal interaction in the river and the absence
of a real estuarine lagoon (Walsh 1968).
Approximately 40 ha of saltmarsh exist around this
estuary. Parsons (1982) suggests that this vegetation con-
sists of a single type made up of a mosaic of patches with
different dominant species. However, visual observation
shows at least two different vegetation types: the low
halophytic vegetation of the lower estuary (dominated by
Sarcocomia spp., Salicomia meyeriana and Chenolea dif-
fusa,); and the taller sedge vegetation in areas of fresher
water (dominated by Juncus kraussii). Parsons (1982) also
gives great prominence to J. acutus and does not mention
./. kraussii. However, this seems to be a misidentification
as J. kraussii is common in the area whereas J. acutus is
comparatively rare.
The aim of this study is to gain a clearer understanding
of the structure of the saltmarshes of the lower Uilkraals
River.
METHODS
After studying aerial photographs, orthophotographic
maps and following field reconnaissance, four transects
* Stress Ecology Research Unit, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag
X7, Claremont 7735.
MS. received: 1993-05-06.
were demarcated across the marshes of the Uilkraals River
(Figure 1). The siting of these transects was determined
subjectively according to variability in species composi-
tion and the relatively undisturbed nature of the vegeta-
tion. Details of these transects are presented in Table 1.
Elevation profiles of the transects were surveyed using a
theodolite, and at least one point on each transect was
surveyed to sea level.
Sampling took place on four occasions during 1987
(March, May, September and November) in order to in-
clude all bulbous and annual plants. Contiguous 1 x 1 m
plots were laid along each transect. The cover-abundance
of each species within the plots was estimated according
to normal phytosociological methods (Braun-Blanquet
1965). Excessive repetition was avoided by not sampling
plots in which it was deemed that the floristic data were
simply repetitions of data already recorded from adjacent
plots. Taxon names follow Arnold & De Wet (1993) and
voucher specimens are housed at the herbarium of the
National Botanical Institute at Stellenbosch (STE), the Na-
tional Herbarium (PRE) and at the Stress Ecology Re-
search Unit at Kirstenbosch. These voucher specimens are
listed by O'Callaghan (1994a). The letters MOC refer to
indeterminate voucher specimens.
FIGURE 1. — The Uilkraals River, Transects U1 to U4.
230
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
TABLE 1 . — Details of transects
As classical Braun-Blanquet values cannot be manipu-
lated mathematically, these values were converted accord-
ing to Table 2. To plot the distribution of species, each
transect was divided into elevation classes of 10 cm. The
converted factors were averaged within each 10 cm class
and further averaged over the four sampling periods. As
some of the species have annual geophytic or hemicryp-
tophytic life -cycles, the number next to the species name
indicates the number of times this species was located
through the year. The order in which the species occur
along the transect is primarily determined by its lowest
starting point and secondarily by its termination point
along the elevation gradient.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The distribution of species along elevation gradients at
Transects U1 to U4 are shown in Figures 2-5. Additional
species at Transect U3 are listed in Table 3.
The distribution patterns of species along these tran-
sects did not compare well with each other, nor was there
a close relationship with those of Langebaan Lagoon, the
Berg River or Kleinmond Lagoon (O’ Callaghan 1994b,
c, d). These inconsistencies could be largely attributed to
a reduced marine input. Heydorn & Bickerton (1982)
report salinities of less than 30%o in the region of U4,
only 400 m from the mouth in midsummer when salinities
would be at their highest.
The vegetation also illustrated a reduced marine in-
fluence. Sporobolus virginicus, usually found at the top
of marshes with a strong marine influence (e.g. Langebaan
Lagoon and the Berg River (O’ Callaghan 1994b & c) was
found consistently near the bottom of the transects. This
is similar to Kleinmond Lagoon (O’Callaghan 1994d)
TABLE 2. — Conversion factors
Cover/abundance
% Cover
Converted factor
present but dead
single plant < 0.01
0.01-1
1-5
5-25
25-50
50-75
75-100
0.1
0.2
0.3
1
5
10
15
20
which is largely closed to the sea and therefore has fresher
water. The presence of Juncus kraussii, Samolus porosus ,
Sarcocomia capensis and/or S. natalensis at all the tran-
sects further indicates lower saline conditions.
Some of the prevailing tidal influences could be in-
ferred from the distribution of species relative to mean
sea level (MSL). Saltmarshes started at 72 cm above MSL
at Ul, compared with -50 cm at the Berg River at a
similar distance from the mouth. Vegetation first appeared
at 48 cm above MSL at U2, and the bottom of U4 was
48 cm above MSL. Vegetation at U3 was recorded from
- 16 cm, but this was Potamogeton pectinatus, a sub-
merged aquatic generally found in river courses. A vertical
bank of approximately 70 cm confined the river course
in this region; the remainder of this transect was well
above MSL.
Ficinia pygmaea
Tetragonia decumbens
Agropyron distichum
Sarcocornia capensis
Romulea tabularis
Chenolea diffusa
Spergularia media
Limonium depauperatum
Puccinellia angusta
Plantago crassifolia
Triglochin bulbosa
Sporobolus virginicus
Salicornia meyeriana
Cotula eckloniana
Height above MSL (cm)
-IGURE 2. — Distribution of species along an elevation gradient on
Transect U 1 . 1-4, numbers of times species located through year.
Bothulia 24,2(1994)
231
Senecio laevigatus
Sarcocornia capensis
Frankenia repens
Cotula filifolia
Romulea tabularis
Plantago crassifolia
Samolus porosus
Spergularia media
Limonium depauperatum
Puccinellia angusta
Triglochin striata
Chenolea diffusa
Sarcocornia perennis
Sporobolus virginicus
Salicomia meyeriana
Triglochin bulbosa
Height above MSL (cm)
FIGURE 3. — Distribution of species along an elevation gradient on
Transect U2. 1-4, number of times species located through year.
Table 4 indicates that these saltmarshes were flooded
only occasionally, as most of them began between
MHWN (mean high water neap) and MHWS (mean high
water spring). The species normally found at or below
MSL ( Spartinci and Zostera at Langebaan Lagoon, and
the Berg River (O'Callaghan 1994b & c)) were absent. It
seems that the marshes were displaced upwards with
respect to MSL. This could be the result of an interaction
between predominant winds (SAWB 1960) and prevailing
marine swells (Heydom & Bickerton 1982) to extend the
ebb phase of the tides and push water higher up the shore
during high tides. Heydom & Bickerton (1982) estimate
that the tidal influence ceases 3 km upstream from the
mouth. However, this is highly variable and depends on
prevailing weather conditions. I measured a tidal fluctua-
tion of more than 75 cm at U3 during a westerly storm.
The soils at U3 between 90 cm and 102 cm above
MSL were hard and highly saline with a sparse vegetation
cover. The salinity of the soils decreased after flooding
and numerous annuals and ephemerals ( Oxalis nidulans,
Sebaea albens, Cotula filifolia, Salicomia meyeriana) ger-
minated, greatly influencing the diversity in this area.
Depending on the amount of rainfall during late spring
TABLE 3. — Additional species at Transect U3
and summer, many of these plants died before setting
seed. This area was again almost devoid of vegetation by
late December.
Height above MSL (cm)
FIGURE 4. — Distribution of species along an elevation gradient on
Transect U3. 1-4, number of times species located through year.
MOC number refers to voucher specimen.
232
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
Lolium perenne 1
Sebaea minutiflora 1
Potypogon monspeliensis 3
Isolepis verrucosula 1
Carex ecklonii 4
Apium graveolens 4
Sarcocomia capensis 4
Isolepis cemua 1
Samolus porosus 4
Juncus kraussii 4
Falkia repens 4
Romulea tabularis 2
Puccinellia angusta 4
Plantago crassifolia 4
Spergutaria media 4
Sporobolus virginicus 4
Limonium depauperatum 4
Chenolea diffusa 4
Triglochin bulbosa 4
Salicomia meyeriana 4
Sarcocomia perennis 4
Triglochin striata 4
I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100110
Height above MSL (cm)
FIGURE 5. — Distribution of species along an elevation gradient on
Transect U4. 1-4, number of times species located through year.
The vegetation closer to the river bank at U3 ( Juncus
kraussii and Samolus porosus ) indicated fresher water
conditions. This pattern is reversed at U4 where fresh
water seeped onto the top of the transect. U4 could be
seen as a concatenation of two situations: a normal
saltmarsh at the lower end [comparable to the marshes at
and Langebaan Lagoon and the Berg River (O’ Callaghan
1994b & c)] and a freshwater sedge marsh [comparable
to Kleinmond Lagoon (O’Callaghan 1994d)|.
CONCLUSIONS
Reduced or altered tidal interaction and the influence of
fresh water in various parts of the river resulted in some
irregular species distributions when compared with saltmarsh
vegetation in other systems. Superficially, the vegetation at
the Uilkraals River seems to be a mosaic of the vegetation
types found at Langebaan Lagoon, the Berg River and
Kleinmond Lagoon (O’ Callaghan 1994b, c, d).
However, the major environmental controlling factors
of each element of the mosaics could be identified. Each
element of the vegetation mosaic could be compared with
the vegetation of the other rivers and further investigation
is expected to show that the controlling factors are similar.
The Sarcocornia/Triglochin marshes at U2 and U4 com-
pare with the intertidal marshes at the Berg River and
Langebaan Lagoon. The areas containing Juncus kraussii
(U3 and U4) are similar to Kleinmond Lagoon and areas
of the Berg River and Langebaan Lagoon which have a
fresh water influence. U1 is similar to the sandy dune
areas at Kleinmond Lagoon and the Berg River.
The saline soils resulting from seasonal flooding and
evaporation at U3 are rare in the other systems. Much of
the area where these soils occur at the Berg River has
been converted to evaporation pans for the commercial
recovery of salt. In other systems, the soils of those areas
which are seasonally flooded are less saline than areas
with a more regular tidal inundation. Similarities do exist
between the seasonally flooded areas of Kleinmond
Lagoon and the Uilkraals River ( Triglochin bulbosa, Sar-
cocomia natalensis, Sebaea spp.). However, Kleinmond
Lagoon is better described as being seasonally exposed
rather than seasonally flooded. As a result, many of the
annuals and ephemerals present at the Uilkraals River are
absent from Kleinmond Lagoon.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I thank all local authorities and private land owners for
access and comments; also, the National Botanical Institute,
The Botany Departments of the University of Cape Town
and the University of Stellenbosch, especially Dr C. Boucher.
REFERENCES
ARNOLD, T.H. & DE WET, B.C. (eds) 1993. Plants of southern Africa:
names and distribution. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South
Africa No. 62. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria.
BRAUN-BLANQUET, J. 1 965. Plant sociology — the study of plant com-
munities (translated, revised and edited by D.C. Fuller, & H.S.
Conrad). Hafner, London.
HEYDORN, A.E.F. & BICKERTON, l.B. 1982. Estuaries of the Cape,
Part II. Synopses of available information on individual systems.
In A.E.F. Heydorn, & J.R. Grindley, Report No. 9: Uilkraals
(CSW 17). CSIR Research Report No. 408.
HEYDORN, A.E.F. & TINLEY, K.L. 1 980. Estuaries of the Cape. Part /.
Synopsis of the Cape coast. Natural features, dynamics and
utilization. CSIR Research Report No. 380.
MIDGELY, D.C. & PITMAN, W.V. 1969. Surface water resources of
South Africa. University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Report
No. 2/69.
NOBLE, R.G. & HEMENS, J. 1978. Inland water ecosystems in South
Africa — a review of research needs. South African National
Scientific Programmes Report No. 34.
O’CALLAGHAN, M. 1994a. Salt marshes of the Cape [South Africa):
vegetation dynamics and interactions. Ph.D. thesis. University of
Stellenbosch.
O'CALLAGHAN, M. 1994b. The saltmarsh vegetation of Langebaan
Lagoon. Bothalia 24: 217-222.
O'CALLAGHAN, M. 1 994c. The saltmarsh vegetation of the lower Berg
River. Bothalia 24: 223-228.
O’CALLAGHAN, M. 1994d. The marsh vegetation of Kleinmond
Lagoon. Bothalia 24: 235-240.
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
233
PARSONS, R. 1982. Flora. In A.E.F. Heydom & l.B. Bickerton, Estuaries
of the Cape, Part II. Synopses of available information on in-
dividual systems. In A.E.F. Heydom & J.R. Grindley, Report No. 9:
Uilkraals (CSV/ 17). CSIR Research Report No. 408: 17, 18.
SAN (South African Navy, Hydrographic Office) 1987. South African
Tide Tables. Maritime Headquarters, Tokai.
SAWB (South African Weather Bureau) 1960. Climate of South Africa,
Part 6: surface winds. Department of Transport, Pretoria.
WALSH, B.N. 1968. Some notes on the incidence and control of driftsands
along the Caledon, Bredasdorp and Riversdale coastline of South
Africa. Department of Forestry Bulletin No 44. Pretoria.
.
Bothalia 24,2: 235-240 (1994)
The marsh vegetation of Kleinmond Lagoon
M. O'CALLAGHAN*
Keywords: Kleinmond Lagoon, saltmarsh, species distribution, zonation
ABSTRACT
The vegetation of Kleinmond Lagoon suggests that this system is in transition from an estuary to a coastal lake. Two major
types of vegetation were recognized, one which is subjected to soil and water conditions of marine origin and the other which is
subjected to conditions of terrestrial origin. These vegetation types are discussed and compared to the vegetation of other
estuarine systems. Artificial manipulations of the mouth seem to have resulted in sediment deposition and a freshening of the
system. These unseasonable manipulations also threaten the continued existence of a number of species in the system.
U1TTREKSEL
Die plantegroei van Kleinmondvlei dui daarop dat hierdie vlei in oorgang is van ’n getyrivier tot ’n strandmeer. Twee
hoofsoorte plantegroei is erken: die wat onderworpe is aan grond- en watertoestande van mariene oorsprong, en die wat
onderworpe is aan toestande van landoorsprong. Hierdie plantegroeitipes word bespreek en met die van ander getyriviere
vergelyk. Die plantegroei toon dat die kunsmatige manipulasie van die mond tot afsetting van sediment en vervarsing van die
stelsel gelei het. Hierdie buitenstydse manipulasies bedreig ook die voortbestaan van sommige spesies in die stelsel.
INTRODUCTION
The term 'lagoon' is usually applied to a semi-enclosed
marine system with a permanent (albeit restricted) con-
nection to the sea and with little or no fresh water input
(Caspers 1967). This definition does not apply to Klein-
mond, but the term is retained for historical reasons (Bally
1985). This system receives fresh water from various
small streams, more saline water as an overflow from the
adjacent Bot River Lagoon, and marine water in the form
of overtopping and during short periods when the mouth
is open to the sea. However, the stabilization of dunes
and overflow areas by alien acacias and the manipulation
of the Bot River mouth have somewhat reduced the saline
input into Kleinmond Lagoon.
The hydrological regime of this lagoon differs substan-
tially from that of Langebaan Lagoon, the Berg River and
Uilkraals River (O'Callaghan 1994a, b, c). The mouth of
the Kleinmond Lagoon is closed for most of the year.
There is usually a connection to the sea after the first
winter rains (June) and again in December. These breach-
ings are usually man-induced, and remain for a period
varying from a few days to a few weeks. Unfortunately,
until recently, no record was kept regarding the dates or
duration of these connections to the sea, nor of the depth
of the water at the time of opening (D. Coetzee, Klein-
mond Municipality, pers. comm.). The reasons given for
opening the mouth are related to either a threat to adjacent
recreational developments [approximately 2 m above
mean sea level (MSL)] or the presence of decaying mats
of green filamentous algae (Enteromorpha, Chaetomorpha
and/or Cladophora) which detract from the aesthetic ap-
peal of the area. This ad hoc management strategy.
* Stress Ecology Research Unit, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag
X7, Claremont 7700.
MS. received: 1993-05-06.
together with other developments have led to a silting up
and freshening of the lagoon, especially the western parts.
The more the lagoon silts up, the lower the volumes of
sea water which can flow into the lagoon when the mouth
is open, suggesting an evolution towards a coastal lake.
This will be advantageous to the growth of plants which
thrive under less saline conditions. The spread of Phrag-
mites has already been noted (O'Callaghan 1982). This
scenario is in opposition to the opinions of Van Heerden
(1985) who suggests that the lagoon is becoming deeper.
There are five basic types of wetland vegetation as-
sociated with Kleinmond Lagoon (O' Callaghan 1982):
1, the tall reed marshes dominated by Phragmites aus-
tralis, Schoenoplectus littoralis or Typha capensis ;
2, the shorter sedge marshes dominated by Juncus kraus-
sii ;
3, the seasonally inundated vegetation on sandy substrata
usually dominated by Sporobolus virginicus ;
4, the seasonally exposed vegetation including Salicomia
meyeriana , Cotula filifolia and Triglochin bulbosa:
5, the aquatic vegetation with Potamogeton pectinatus,
Chara globularis and Zannichellia palustris.
Vegetation types 3, 4 and 5 may overlap or interchange
seasonally.
The aim of this study is to gain a clearer understanding
of the relative distribution and structure of these vegeta-
tion types.
METHODS
After studying aerial photographs, orthophotographic
maps and following field reconnaissance, six transects
were demarcated across the marshes of Kleinmond
236
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
FIGURE 1. — Kleinrnond Lagoon,
Transects K1 to K6,
Lagoon (Figure 1). The siting of these transects was deter-
mined subjectively according to variability in species
composition and the relatively undisturbed nature of the
vegetation. Details of these transects are presented in
Table 1 . Elevation profiles of the transects were surveyed
using a theodolite, and at least one point on each transect
was surveyed to sea level.
Sampling took place on four occasions during 1987
(March, May, September and November) in order to in-
clude all bulbous and annual plants. Contiguous 1 x 1 m
plots were laid along each transect. The cover-abundance
of each species within the plots was estimated according
to normal phytosociological methods (Braun-Blanquet
1965). Excessive repetition was avoided by not sampling
plots in which it was deemed that the floristic data were
simply repetitions of data already recorded from adjacent
plots. Taxon names follow Arnold & De Wet (1993) and
voucher specimens are housed at the herbarium of the
National Botanical Institute at Stellenbosch (STE), the Na-
tional Herbarium (PRE) and at the Stress Ecology Re-
search Unit at Kirstenbosch. These voucher specimens are
listed by O’Callaghan (1994d). The letters MOC refer to
indeterminate voucher specimens.
TABLE 1 . — Details of transects
As classical Braun-Blanquet values cannot be manipu-
lated mathematically, these values were converted accord-
ing to Table 2.
To plot the distribution of species, each transect was
divided into elevation classes of 10 cm. The converted
factors were averaged within each 1 0 cm class and further
averaged over the four sampling periods. As some of the
species have annual geophytic or hemicryptophytic life-
cycles, the number next to the species name on Figures
2 to 7 indicates the number of times this species was lo-
cated through the year. The order in which the species
occur along the transect is primarily determined by its
lowest starting point and secondarily by its termination
point along the elevation gradient.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The distribution of species along elevation gradients
on Transects K1 to K6 are shown in Figures 2-7. Addi-
tional species in Transects K4 to K6 are listed in Tables
3-5.
At first glance, these transects seem to fall into two
groups: Transects K1 to K3 and Transects K4 to K6.
Transects K1 to K 3
These transects were exposed to stronger marine in-
fluences, albeit seasonal. The soils were coarse, of marine
origin, alkaline and contained very little organic matter.
TABLE 2. — Conversion factors
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
237
Herb 4 (MOC 1 537)
Sonchus oleraceus
Cotula coronopifolia
Arctotis sp. (MOC 1 536)
Sporobolus virginicus
Crassula natans
Cyperus laevigatus
Bolboschoenus maritimus
3
1 1 1 1 f 1 1
80 90 100110120130140
Height above MSL (cm)
Scirpus nodosus
Vellereophyton dealbatum
Lobelia anceps
Centella asiatlca
Sporobolus virginicus
Cyperus laevigatus
Phragmites australis
Potamogeton pectinatus
80 90 100110120130140
FIGURE 2. — Distribution of species along an elevation gradient on
Transect K1 . 1-4, number of times species located through year.
Height above MSL (cm)
FIGURE 4. — Distribution of species along an elevation gradient on
Transect K3. 1—4, number of times species located through year.
Sporobolus virginicus dominated the vegetation, par-
ticularly near the bottom of the transects.
Relatively few species were found on these shorter
transects when compared with K4 to K6 (Figures 2-7).
Stenotaphrum secundatum
Ehrharta villosa
Aster subulatus
Senecio burchellii
Mentha aquatica
Sonchus oleraceus
Scirpus nodosus
Apium graveolens
Isolepis verrucosula
Plantago crassifolia
Cyperus laevigatus
Triglochin bulbosa
Cotula eckloniana
Sporobolus virginicus
FIGURE 3. — Distribution of species along an elevation gradient on
Transect K2. 1 -4, number of times species located through year.
Phragmites australis was only found at K3. This
species was restricted to the Lamloch area (the eastern
part of the lagoon) until 1983, with a small patch at the
mouth of the Isaacs River. A number of factors have led
to its spread:
a) during the 1980/1981 summer season, the footbridge
embankment was extended towards the seaward side. This
restricted the outflow channel to an area underlain by a
rocky sill. The amount and rate of outflow during sub-
sequent openings of the mouth was thus reduced. As a
result, previously transient sediments accumulated in the
western parts of the lagoon as they are not being washed
out to sea;
b) the regular opening of the mouth prevented the water in
the lagoon from rising more than 2 m above MSL. An
increased frequency of mouth opening (pers. obs. ) resulted
in a retention of sediments in the system as outflowing
water velocities would be reduced;
c) the stabilization of the dunes by alien shrubs drastically
reduced the amount of saline water entering the western
parts of the lagoon. These shrubs trap wind-blown sand,
but do not have the soil binding capabilities of the natural
TABLE 3. — Additional species at Transect K4
MOC numbers refer to voucher specimens.
— i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 —
80 90 100110120130140150
Height above MSL (cm)
238
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
Drosera capensis
Herb 7(MOC 14/6)
Scirpus nodosus
Hemarthria altissima
Centetta asiatica
Fatkia repens
Bolboschoenus maritimus
Cotula coronopifolia
Chondropetalum tectorum
Samolus valerandii
Eleocharis schlechteri
Diplachne fusca
Pulicaria scabra
Lobelia anceps
Samolus porosus
Hydrocotyle verticillata
Mentha aquatica
Sporobolus virginicus
Crassula natans
Juncus kraussii
Triglochin striata
Scirpus venustulus
Ruppia maritima
Potamogeton pectinatus
Chara globularis
FIGURE 5. — Distribution of species along an elevation gradient on
Transect K4. 1-4, number of times species located through year.
vegetation. Slumping thus takes place from beneath the
canopy;
d) the increased residential development to the north of the
western part of the lagoon resulted in the destruction of the
natural vegetation and increased hard surfaces. These
resulted in an increased fresh water runoff entering the
lagoon via creeks and rivulets.
These developments had the nett effect of altering the
equilibrium between fresh water and marine input in the
TABLE 4. — Additional species at Transect K5
MOC numbers refer to voucher specimens.
system to one which is aggrading and freshening, at least
in the vicinity of K3. These are ideal conditions for the spread
of Phmgmites australis (Heinecken & Damstra 1983).
Transects K4 to K6
The soils were of terrestrial origin, acidic and with a
higher organic content. The soils at K6 were slightly dif-
ferent in that they were acidic at the lower reaches of the
transect, but became more alkaline near the top.
Although Juncus kraussii dominated, Sporobolus vir-
ginicus was present and sometimes co-dominated, par-
ticularly on the upper parts of the transect where the
effects of the acidic lagoon water were not as pronounced.
Sporobolus virginicus was rare at K4 when compared
to the other transects. This was the only transect on the
northern side of the lagoon (between the lagoon and the
mountains). Preliminary soil analyses indicated differen-
ces in soil conductivity at this transect relative to K5 and
K6. This might indicate a qualitative difference in the
mineral content of the soils between K4 and the others.
TABLE 5. — Additional species at Transect K6
MOC number refers to voucher specimen.
Height above MSL (cm)
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
239
Isolepis digitata 1
Scirpus nodosus 4
Hemarthria altissima 1
Centella asiatica 4
Polypogon monspeliensis 1
Conyza ulmifolia 4
Isolepis verrucosula 1
Sarcocornia perennis 3
Aplum graveolens 3
Atriplex patula 3
Orphium frutescens 4
Samolus porosus 4
Plantago crasslfolium 4
Sarcocornia natalensis 4
Triglochin bulbosa 4
Salicornia meyeriana 2
Ruppia maritima 3
Juncus kraussii 4
Sporobolus vlrginicus 4
Scirpus venustulus 2
Cotula coronopifolia 4
Triglochin striata 4
Eleocharis schlechteri 4
Potamogeton pectinatus 3
Chara globularis 2
I
i
1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
70 80 90 100110120130140150
Height above MSL (cm)
FIGURE 6. — Distribution of species along an elevation gradient on
Transect K5. 1-4, number of times species located through year.
Much seepage was also noted along the northern shore,
resulting in a permanently high water table. Although
Sporobolus virginicus might withstand seasonal flooding,
it might not withstand a permanently flooded rhizosphere.
When comparing the vegetation of this system with
that of Langebaan Lagoon, the Berg River and Uilkraals
River (O’Callaghan 1994a, b, c), the following are imme-
diately noticeable:
and largely consist of Juncus kraussii. At Kleinmond
Lagoon, much of the vegetation is dominated by this
species, but many other sedges are also present. This
increased dominance by sedges indicates the decreased
saline conditions which prevail in this system;
2, an increased proportion of annual and ephemeral herbs.
This indicates a less predictable system (limited tidal
interaction, seasonality, irregular mouth-opening).
Aquatic vegetation is important in this system. Pota-
mogeton pectinatus was found at K3 to K6. This species
disappeared from the western parts during spring and sum-
mer when salinities increased and the water levels dropped
as a result of mouth-opening. This species was present
throughout the whole year at K6. In contrast, Chara
Stenotaphrum secundatum
Scirpus nodosus
Cynodon dactylon
Conyza ulmifolia
Crassula decumbens
Falkia repens
Polypogon monspeliensis
Plantago crassifolium
Puccineliia angusta
Isolepis verrucosula
Triglochin bulbosa
Atriplex patula
Apium graveolens
Juncus kraussii
Cotula coronopifolia
Salicornia meyeriana
Crassula natans
Sarcocornia natalensis
Sporobolus virginicus
Isolepis cemua
Thglochin striata
Eleocharis schlechteri
Zannichellia palustris
Chara globularis
Potamogeton pectinatus
Height above MSL (cm)
1, an increased preponderance of sedges. In the Other FIGURE 7.— Distribution of species along an elevation gradient on
systems, sedges are mostly restricted to less saline areas Transect K6. 1 -4, number of times species located through year.
240
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
globularis is a seasonal plant. It was found at K4 during
autumn, at K5 during late summer and autumn, and was
only absent from K6 during midwinter.
Although Ruppia maritima is the most important
aquatic species in the adjacent Bot River Estuary (Bally
et al. 1985), it was only found at K4 and K5 during late
summer. Even though it is regarded as a perennial plant
(Obermeyer 1966), it can only grow when favourable con-
ditions prevail: when local depressions fill with fresh
water after the mouth closes. It attained its greatest cover
after winter, but it died off in summer as the depression
again dried out. Under these conditions, Ruppia maritima
might be regarded as a ‘facultative annual’, i.e. a plant
which is seasonally absent due to the seasonal demise of
its habitat. On these transects, Triglochin bulbosa and Sar-
cocomia natalensis might also be regarded as facultative
annuals with an opposite seasonal phase. They were found
in these depressions when the water was low.
This induced seasonal demise of habitat should be an
important management consideration. The flowering
season for Ruppia maritima is early summer (Bond &
Goldblatt 1984), when conditions at Kleinmond Lagoon
are not favourable for growth and it is not found in a
flowering state. A compromise should be sought between
the needs of winter facultative annuals, summer faculta-
tive annuals and obligate annuals. The induced seasonal
conditions prevailing at this site were unsuitable for both
the facultative and obligate annuals. The correct manage-
ment option would be to allow this area to remain flooded
until early midsummer, after which it should remain ex-
posed until autumn.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I thank all local authorities and private land owners
for access and comments; also, the National Botanical In-
stitute, The Botany Departments of the University of Cape
Town and the University of Stellenbosch, especially Dr
C. Boucher.
REFERENCES
ARNOLD, T.H. & DE WET, B.C. (eds) 1993. Plants of southern Africa:
names and distribution. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South
Africa No. 62. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria.
BALLY, R. 1985. Historical records of the Bot River estuarine system.
Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 45: 291-304.
BALLY, R„ MCQUACD, C.D. & PIERCE, S.M. 1985. Primary produc-
tivity of the Bot River Estuary, South Africa. Transactions of the
Royal Society of South Africa 45: 333-346.
BOND, P. & GOLDBLATT, P. 1984. Plants of the Cape flora. Journal of
South African Botany , Supplementary Volume No. 13.
BRAUN-BLANQUET, J. 1 965. Plant sociology — the study of plant com-
munities (translated, revised and edited by D.C. Fuller & H.S.
Conrad). Hafner, London.
CASPERS, H. 1967. Analysis of definitions and biological considera-
tions. In G.H. Lauff, Estuaries: 6-8. American Association for the
Advancement of Science Publication No. 83.
HEINECKEN, T.J.E. & DAMSTRA, K.ST J. 1983. Estuaries of the
Cape. Part II: synopses of available information on individual
systems. In A.E.F. Heydorn & J.R. Grindley, Report No. 24:
Onrus (CSW 14). CSIR Research Report No. 423.
OBERMEYER, A. A. 1966. Ruppiaceae. In L.E. Codd, B. de Winter &
H.B. Rycroft, Flora of southern Africa 1: 70-72.
O’CALLAGHAN, M. 1982. Flora. In K. Koop, Estuaries of the Cape.
Part II: synopses of available information on individual systems.
In A.E.F. Heydom & J.R. Grindley. Report No. 18: Bot/Klein-
mond System ( CSW 13): 24—27. CSIR Research Report No. 417.
O’CALLAGHAN, M. 1994a. The saltmarsh vegetation of Langebaan
Lagoon. Bothalia 24: 217-222.
O'CALLAGHAN, M. 1994b. The saltmarsh vegetation of the lower Berg
River. Bothalia 24: 223-228.
O'CALLAGHAN, M. 1994c. The marsh vegetation of the lower Uil-
kraals River. Bothalia 24: 229-233.
O’CALLAGHAN, M. 1994d. Salt marshes of the Cape ( South Africa):
vegetation dynamics and interactions. Ph.D. thesis. University of
Stellenbosch.
VAN HEERDEN, I. 1985. Barrier/estuarine processes; Bot River Es-
tuary— an interpretation of aerial photographs. Transactions of
the Royal Society of South Africa 45: 239-25 1 .
Bothalia 24,2: 241-246(1994)
Chromosome studies on African plants. 11. The tribe Andropogoneae
(Poaceae: Panicoideae)
J.J. SPIES*, T.H. TROSKIE*, E. VAN DER VYVER and S.M.C. VAN WYK*
Keywords: Andropogon , chromosome numbers, Cymbopogon, cytogenetics, Hyparrhenia , meiosis, polyploidy
ABSTRACT
Representative specimens of various species of the genera Andropogon L., Cymbopogon Spreng., Elionurus Kunth ex
Willd., Hyparrhenia Foum. and Hyperthelia Clayton were cytogenetically studied. All specimens had a secondary basic
chromosome number of ten. Polyploidy, either as alloploidy or segmental alloploidy, was frequent. The taxa studied represent
mature polyploid complexes.
UITTREKSEL
Verteenwoordigende eksemplare van verskeie spesies van die genusse Andropogon L., Cymbopogon Spreng., Elionurus
Kunth ex Willd.. Hyparrhenia Foum. en Hyperthelia Clayton is sitogeneties bestudeer. Die eksemplare het almal 'n sekondere
basiese chromosoomgetal van tien. Poliploidie kom dikwels voor as alloplo'fdie of segmentele alloploidie. Die bestudeerde
taksons verteenwoordig volwasse poliploiede komplekse.
INTRODUCTION
The tribe Andropogoneae forms part of the subfamily
Panicoideae of the Poaceae. Andropogoneae is a large
tribe with 85 genera and approximately 960 species
(Clayton & Renvoize 1986). Although the tribe is well
defined (Clayton 1986) and well represented in South
Africa, few cytogenetic studies on this tribe have been
completed in South Africa. Chromosome numbers ob-
tained from miscellaneous chromosome counts in South
African representatives of the Andropogoneae, indicate
that the tribe has a primary basic chromosome number of
five (Spies et al. 1991).
The aim of this paper is to present chromosome num-
bers obtained during routine cytogenetic investigations
from our laboratories.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
For the purpose of this study, cytogenetic material was
collected in two different ways. The material was either
collected and fixed in the field, or living material was
collected in the field and transplanted in the nurseries of
either the National Botanical Institute (Pretoria) or the
Department of Botany and Genetics, University of the
Orange Free State (Bloemfontein). The cytogenetic mate-
rial was collected and fixed at both the aforementioned
institutions. The material used and the collecting localities
are listed in Table 1. Voucher specimens are housed in
the Geo Potts Herbarium, Department of Botany and
Genetics, University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfon-
tein (BLFU) or the National Herbarium, Pretoria (PRE).
Department of Botany and Genetics, University of the Orange Free
State, RO. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa.
MS. received: 19934)7-16.
Young inflorescences were fixed in Camoy’s fixative.
After 24-48 hours of fixation, the fixative was replaced
by 70% ethanol. Anthers were squashed in 2% aceto-car-
mine (Darlington & La Cour 1976). Slides were made
permanent by freezing them with liquid CCL (Bowen
1956), followed by dehydration in ethanol and mounting
in Euparal. A Nikon Microphot photomicroscope and Il-
ford Pan-F film (ASA 50) were used for the photo-
micrographs. Except where otherwise indicated, at least
twenty cells per specimen were studied for each meiotic
stage.
Meiotic chromosome counts are given as haploid (n)
numbers to conform to the style set out by the editors of
the Index to plant chromosome numbers series, published
by the Missouri Botanical Garden.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The cytogenetic materials used during this study were
collected between three and eight years prior to this study.
Difficulty was experienced in obtaining sufficient contrast
between the chromosomes and the cytoplasm. Conse-
quently, the quality of the photos is poor.
Representatives of the Andropogoneae usually have a
basic chromosome number of five (Clayton & Renvoize
1986). This basic chromosome number is confirmed by
all the specimens in our study (Table 1). Ploidy levels,
ranging from tetraploid (n = 2x = 10) to 16-ploid (n = 8x
= 40), observed during this study, fall within the range of
diploid (n = x = 5) to 24-ploid (n = 12x = 60) described
by Clayton & Renvoize (1986).
The genus Andropogon L. comprises approximately
100 species (Clayton & Renvoize 1986), with 15 species
indigenous to South Africa (Gibbs Russell et al. 1990).
The six species studied have haploid chromosome num-
242
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
TABLE 1. — Haploid chromosome numbers (n) of representatives of the tribe Andropogoneae (Poaceae, Panicoideae) in southern Africa with the
voucher specimen numbers and their localities, arranged according to the system of Edwards & Leistner (1971)
Locality
EASTERN CAPE. — 3028 (Matatiele): 36 km from Rhodes to Maclear via Naude's Neck, (-CC)
EASTERN TRANSVAAL. — 2530 (Lydenburg): Goede Hoop, on road between Dullstroom
and Lydenburg. (-AC)
EASTERN CAPE. — 3028 (Matatiele): 47 km from Rhodes to Maclear via Naude's Neck, (-CC)
EASTERN CAPE. — 3028 (Matatiele): 69 km from Rhodes to Maclear via Naude’s Neck, (-CC)
EASTERN CAPE. — 3128 (Umtata): 38 km from Maclear to Elliot, (-AC)
EASTERN CAPE. — 3323 (Willowmore): 9 km from Coldstream to Humansdorp, (-DD)
NORTHERN TRANSVAAL. — 2428 (Nylstroom): Soutpan Experimental Farm, (-CD)
PWV. — 2627 (Potchefstroom): 12 km from Hartebeespoort turnoff, on road between
Muldersdrift and Hekpoort, (-BB)
EASTERN TRANSVAAL. — 2430 (Pilgrim's Rest): 17 km from Sabie to Graskop, (-DD)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3321 (Ladismith): 6 km from Ladismith in Seweweekspoort, (-AD)
EASTERN CAPE. — 3424 (Humansdorp): 30 km from Humansdorp to Knysna, (-AA)
EASTERN TRANSVAAL.— 2530 (Lydenburg): Mac-Mac Falls, (-BB)
ORANGE FREE STATE. — 2829 (Harrismith): near Sterkfontein Dam, (-CA)
KWAZULU/NATAL. — 2930 (Pietermaritzburg): 2 km from Greytown to Colenso, (-BA)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): Tafelberg, near cableway, (-AB)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): 34 km from Worcester to Paarl in Du Toit’s Kloof, (-CA)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3420 (Bredasdorp): 6 km from Ouplaas to De Hoop Nature Reserve, (-AD)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3420 (Bredasdorp): 1 km north of De Hoop Nature Reserve, (-CA)
NORTHERN TRANSVAAL. — 2428 (Nylstroom): Soutpan Experimental Farm, (-CD)
NORTHERN TRANSVAAL. — 2428 (Nylstroom): Soutpan Experimental Farm, (-CD)
PWV. — 2528 (Pretoria): Sphinx Railway Station, (-CA)
EASTERN CAPE. — 3325 (Port Elizabeth): 37 km from Rocklands to Elandsrivier, (-CA)
KWAZULU/NATAL. — 2832 (Mtubatuba): 12 km from Cape Vidal to St Lucia, (-AB)
EASTERN CAPE.— 3325 (Port Elizabeth): Spring Resort Valley, (-CB)
EASTERN CAPE. — 3027 (Lady Grey): 78 km from Rhodes to Maclear via Naude’s Neck, (-CD)
EASTERN CAPE. — 3027 (Lady Grey): Karringmelkspruit on road between Lady Grey and
Barkly East, (-CD)
EASTERN CAPE. — 3027 (Lady Grey): 15 km from Barkly East to Lady Grey, (-CD)
EASTERN CAPE. — 3027 (Lady Grey): 50 km from Barkly East to Lady Grey, (-CD)
EASTERN CAPE. — 3028 (Matatiele): 10 km from Rhodes to Maclear via Naude's Neck, (-CC)
ORANGE FREE STATE.— 2829 (Harrismith): Kaity Nilgeres, (-AC)
KWAZULU/NATAL. — 2729 (Volksrust): 80 km from Newcastle to Ladysmith, (-BD)
KWAZULU/NATAL.— 2829 (Harrismith): Cathedral Peak, (-CC)
SWAZILAND. — 2631 (Mbabane): 22 km northeast of Mbabane, (-AA)
KWAZULU/NATAL.— 2931 (Stanger): Balito Bay, (-CA)
NORTHERN TRANSVAAL. — 2428 (Nylstroom): Soutpan Experimental Farm, (-CD)
KWAZULU/NATAL.— 2729 (Volksrust): O'Niels Cottage, (-BD)
KWAZULU/NATAL. — 2930 (Pietermaritzburg): 2 km from Greytown to Colenso, (-BA)
WESTERN CAPE. — 31 18 (Vanrhynsdorp): Gifberg Pass, (-DC)
EASTERN CAPE. — 3027 (Lady Grey): 15 km from Barkly East to Lady Grey, (-DC)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): Du Toit’s Kloof Pass, (-CA)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3419 (Caledon): 27 km from Villiersdorp to Caledon, (-AB)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3420 (Bredasdorp): 3 km north of De Hoop Nature Reserve, (-AD)
EASTERN TRANSVAAL. — 2530 (Lydenburg): 10 km from Sabie to Graskop, (-BB)
SWAZILAND. — 2631 (Mbabane): 13 km from Manzini to Siteki, (-AD)
EASTERN CAPE. — 3027 (Lady Grey): 27 km from Barkly East to Rhodes, (-DC)
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
243
FIGURE 1 . — Meiotic chromosomes in the genus Andropogon. A, A. amethyslinus. Spies 4015, n = 4x = 20, metaphase I; B, A. amethystinus, Spies
4015, n = 4x = 20, telophase I with 8 chromosome laggards; C, A. appendiculatus. Spies 3514, n = 2x = 1 0, metaphase I; D, A. appendiculatus.
Spies 4694, n = 2x = 10, early metaphase I: E, A. appendiculatus. Spies 4709, n = 4x = 20, diakinesis; F, A. appendiculatus. Spies 4694, n =
2x = 10, anaphase I; G, A. chinensis. Spies 3315, n = 4x = 20, anaphase I; FI, A. huillensis. Spies 1977, n = 8x = 40, metaphase I; I, A.
huillensis. Spies 1977, n = 8x = 40, metaphase I; J, A. huillensis. Spies 1977, anaphase I; K, A. huillensis. Spies 1977, n = 8x = 40, telophase
I with 2 micronuclei. Scale bar: A-I, K, 10 pm; J, 15 pm.
bers ranging from n = 10 to n = 40. The Andropogon
amethystinus specimen studied, had a haploid chromo-
some number of n = 20 (Figure 1 A). This is a lower ploidy
level than the n = 30 specimen described by Hoshino &
Davidse (1988). Meiosis is abnormal in this specimen and
between five and ten anaphase laggards are present in
every anaphase cell (Figure IB). No multivalents are
formed and this specimen therefore seems to be an al-
lopolyploid.
Three different haploid chromosome numbers are
present in A. appendiculatus, namely n = 10, 20 and 30
(Figure 1C-F). No specimen seen formed multivalents,
and all can therefore be described as allop loids. All ploidy
levels are based on ten and the absence of multivalents,
indicates that A. appendiculatus may have a secondary
basic chromosome number of ten. Two different ploidy
levels, n = 10 and 20, are present in A. chinensis (Figure
1G). All the specimens displayed a very low frequency
of multivalents (with an average of 0.47 multivalents per
cell). The low multivalent frequency suggests that these
specimens represent segmental alloploidy. The presence
of multivalents in plants with a haploid chromosome num-
ber of ten, indicates that the basic chromosome number
of the genus is five, in contrast to the suggested ten
described for A. appendiculatus.
All A. eucomus specimens have haploid chromosome
numbers of n = 10. Haploid chromosome numbers of n
= 10 and 20 have previously been described (Spies & Du
Plessis 1986; 1987; Spies et al. 1991). Only bivalents were
observed during this study, indicating that this species has
an alloploid origin. A. huillensis is represented by a single
specimen in this study. This specimen has a haploid
chromosome number of n = 40 (Figure 1H), but cell
fusion resulted in meiotic cells with more than 100
chromosomes (Figure II). Some anaphase I cells (20%)
contain anaphase laggards (Figure 1 J), resulting in
micronuclei during telophase I (Figure IK). Chromosome
associations are restricted to bivalents, or occasionally two
univalents, and A. huillensis is also an alloploid. In this
study A. schirensis is represented by a single specimen.
This specimen has a haploid chromosome number of n =
10 and meiosis is normal.
The genus Andropogon has a basic chromosome num-
ber of five, as indicated by the multivalent formation ob-
served in n = 10 specimens of A. chinensis during this
244
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
study. No specimen with n = 5 has, as yet, been observed
to confirm the basic chromosome number beyond doubt.
The basic chromosome number for the genus is inferred
from the existence of other species in the tribe with n =
5, for example Sorghum (Garber 1950). The basic
chromosome number of a taxon is the lowest haploid
chromosome number in any lower ranking taxon that does
not involve aneuploidy (Stace 1980). With this definition
in mind the lowest haploid chromosome number of a
lower ranking taxon in this tribe is five. If n = 5 was
derived through aneuploidy, various intermediate chromo-
some numbers are to be expected in the tribe, especially
among close relatives of Sorghum, or even in Sorghum
itself, since it contains species with both x = 5 and 1 0 as
the basic number (Garber 1950; Celarier 1956, 1958;
Spies et al 1991). The only deviation from multiples of
5 (or 10) among closely related plants, is x = 9 in Cleis-
tachne sorghoides (Gibbs Russell et al. 1990). Therefore,
it can be concluded that the tribe Andropogoneae has a
primary basic chromosome number of five. However,
most taxa in the Andropogoneae living today, suggest a
basic chromosome number of ten. The tribe therefore has
a primary basic chromosome number of five and a secon-
dary basic chromosome number of ten.
The chromosomal behaviour during meiosis indicates
that most Andropogon species represent mature polyploid
complexes, because no diploids are found and the majority
of specimens vary from tetraploid to 16-ploid. During
polyploidization the species were either subjected to
diploidization, or originated through hybridization (al-
loploidy). A more comprehensive study of this genus is
urgently needed.
Cymbopogon Spreng. comprises approximately 40
species (Clayton & Renvoize 1986). Gibbs Russell et al.
(1990) recognized an urgent need for the revision of this
genus with its six southern African species. The basic
chromosome number of Cymbopogon is five or ten (Gibbs
Russell et al. 1990). This study included four species, and
haploid chromosome numbers varied between n = 10 and
40.
FIGURE 2. — Meiolic chromosomes in the genus Cymbopogon. A, C. excavatus , Du Plessis 129 , n = 2x = 10, anaphase I; B, C. marginatus , Spies
3887, n = 2x =10, early metaphase I; C, C. marginatus. Spies 4489, n = 2x = 10, metaphase I; D, C. plurinodis, Spies 2026, n = 8x = 40,
diakinesis; E, C. plurinodis. Spies 3482, n = 2x = 10, metaphase I; F, C. plurinodis. Spies 3300, n = 2x = 10, anaphase I; G. C. plurinodis.
Spies 2026, n = 8x = 40, anaphase I ; H, C. validus. Spies 3480, n = 2x = 10, early metaphase I; I, C. validus. Spies 3480, n = 2x = 10, anaphase
I; J, C. validus. Spies 2396, n = 6x = 30, late anaphase I with 5 chromosome laggards. Scale bar: A-Ft, 10|im; I, J, 15 pm.
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
245
FIGURE 3. — Meiotic chromosomes in Elionurus muticus, all specimens with n = 2x = 10. A, Spies 4740. diakinesis; B, Spies 4755, anaphase II; C,
Spies 4755, telophase I with 2 micronuclei. Scale bar: A-C, 10 pm.
In this study Cymbopogon excavatus is represented by
a single specimen. The specimen has a haploid chromo-
some number of ten and meiosis is normal (Figure 2A),
with only bivalents being formed. Normal meiosis, with
a haploid chromosome number of 10 and the presence of
bivalents only (Figure 2B, C), has also been observed in
C. marginatus. Various ploidy levels are present in C.
phtrinodis and haploid chromosome numbers of n = 10,
20 and 40 have been observed (Figure 2D-G). Two dif-
ferent haploid chromosome numbers, n = 10 and 30, are
present in different specimens of C. validus (Figure 2FI,
I). Although only bivalents are formed at the lower ploidy
level, various univalents are present during metaphase I
in the specimen with the higher ploidy level, resulting in
chromosome laggards during anaphase I (Figure 2J).
The genus Cymbopogon has a secondary basic chromo-
some number of 10. The occurrence of polyploid speci-
mens and the absence of multivalents suggests an al-
loploid origin. Alloploidy is the product of hybridization
and an increase in chromosome number, and the taxon-
omic difficulties indicated by Gibbs Russell et al. (1990),
may therefore be attributed to hybridization. A revision of
this genus should include a thorough cytogenetic inves-
tigation.
The genus Elionurus Kunth ex Willd. comprises 15
species (Clayton & Renvoize 1986), with only E. muticus
(Spreng.) Kunth being indigenous to South Africa (Gibbs
Russell et al. 1990). All the specimens studied have a
haploid chromosome number of n = 10. Meiosis is regular
with only bivalents being formed (Figure 3).
The genus Hyparrhenia Foum. comprises 55 species
(Clayton & Renvoize 1986), with 20 indigenous species
(Gibbs Russell et al. 1990). The basic chromosome num-
FIGURE 4. — Meiotic chromosomes in the genus Hyparrhenia. A, H. anamesa, Spies 2567, n = 4x = 20, metaphase I; B , H. anamesa. Spies 1969.
n = 4x = 20, anaphase I with chromosome laggards; C, H. hirta, Spies 4342, n = 4x = 20, metaphase I; D, H. hirta, Du Plessis 148, n = 4x =
20, anaphase I with 4 chromosome laggards; E, H. pilgeriana. Spies 4635, n = 2x = 10, diakinesis; F, H. pilgeriana. Spies 4635, n = 2x = 10,
metaphase I; G, H. pilgeriana. Spies 4738, n = 8x = 40, anaphase I. Scale bar; A, C, E-G, 10 |im; B. D, 15 pm.
246
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
ber of this genus is described as 10 and 15 (Gibbs Russell
et al. 1990). Six taxa are included in this study.
Hyparrhenia anameSa has haploid chromosome num-
bers of n = 20 and 30 (Figure 4A, B). These numbers
correspond to the earlier numbers obtained by Spies &
Du Plessis (1988) and Du Plessis & Spies (1988). The
lack of multivalents suggests that these specimens are
either alloploids, or homoeologous chromosome pairing
is suppressed by the action of Ph-like genes (Riley &
Chapman 1958; Sears 1976). Both varieties of H. filipen-
clulci studied, i.e. filipendula and pilosa, have haploid
chromosome numbers of 20, as does H. hirta (Figure 4C,
D). Haploid chromosome numbers of 15, 20 and 30 have
previously been described for this species (Spies & Du
Plessis 1988; Hoshino & Davidse 1988). Hyparrhenia pil-
geriana has haploid chromosome numbers of n = 10 and
40 (Figure 4E-G). The last species studied, H. variabilis,
has a haploid chromosome number of n = 20.
The genus Hyperthelia Clayton is represented by a
single indigenous species. This study confirms the haploid
chromosome number of Hyperthelia dissoluta as n = 20.
The chromosome numbers of all specimens studied are
multiples of ten. This evidence supports a basic chromo-
some number of five for the tribe (Celarier 1956). The
occurrence of a few multivalents in some specimens, in-
dicates that Ph-like genes are possibly not present. The
near absence of diploids and prevalence of polyploids,
suggests that these taxa represent mature polyploid com-
plexes. The formation of mainly bivalents in all specimens
indicates an alloploid or segmental alloploid origin for
these specimens. This supports a hybrid origin for the taxa.
In conclusion, the Andropogoneae has a secondary
basic chromosome number of ten. Polyploidy is extremely
frequent. It occurs either as alloploidy or segmental al-
loploidy. This process of hybridization and polyploidiza-
tion resulted in a number of mature polyploid complexes.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Mrs H. du Plessis (National Botanical Institute,
Pretoria) is thanked for providing some of the material
used during this study. The University of the Orange Free
State and the Foundation for Research Development are
thanked for financial assistance during this study.
REFERENCES
BOWEN, C.C. 1956. Freezing by liquid carbon dioxide in making slides
permanent. Stain Technology 31 : 87-90.
CELARIER, R.R 1956. Additional evidence for five as the basic chro-
mosome number of the Andropogoneae. Rhodora 58: 135-143.
CELARIER, R.R 1958. Cytotaxonomy of the Andropogoneae. III. Sub-
tribe Sorgheae, genus Sorghum. Cytologia 23: 395-41 8.
CLAYTON. W.D. 1986. Andropogoneae. In T.R. Soderstrom, K.W. Hilu,
C.S. Campbell & M.E. Barkworth. Grass systematics and evolu-
tion: 307-309. Smithsonian Institute Publications, Washington
DC.
CLAYTON, W.D. & RENVOIZE. S.A. 1986. Genera graminum— gras-
ses of the world. Kew Bulletin Additional Series 13: 1-389.
DARLINGTON, C.D. & LA COUR, L.F. 1976. The handling of chro-
mosomes. Allen & Unwin, London.
DU PLESSIS, H. & SPIES, J.J., 1988. Chromosome studies on African
plants. 8. Bothalia 18: 119-122.
EDWARDS. D. & LEISTNER. O.A. 1971 . A degree reference system for
citing biological records from southern Africa. Mitteilungen der
Botanischen Staatssammlung, Miinchen 10: 501-509.
GARBER, E.D. 1950. Cytotaxonomic studies in the genus Sorghum.
University of California Publications in Botany 23: 283-36 1 .
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., WATSON. M„ KOEKEMOER. M„ SMOOK,
L„ BARKER, N.P.. ANDERSON. H.M. & DALLWITZ, M.J.
1990. Grasses of southern Africa. Memoirs of the Botanical Sur-
vey of South Africa No. 58.
HOSHINO, T. & DAVIDSE, G. 1988. Chromosome numbers of grasses
(Poaceae) from southern Africa. Annals of the Missouri Botanical
Garden 75: 866-873.
RILEY, R. & CHAPMAN, V. 1958. Genetic control of cytologically
diploid behaviour of hexaploid wheat. Nature 182: 713-715.
SEARS, E.R. 1976. Genetic control of chromosome pairing in wheat.
Annual Review of Genetics 10: 31-51.
SPIES, J.J. & DU PLESSIS, H., 1986. Chromosome studies on African
plants. 1. Bothalia 16: 87, 88.
SPIES, J.J. & DU PLESSIS, H.. 1987. Chromosome studies on African
plants. 3. Bothalia 17: 131-135.
SPIES, J.J. & DU PLESSIS, H„ 1988. Chromosome studies on African
plants. 6. Bothalia 18: 111-114.
SPIES, J.J., VAN DER MERWE, E„ DU PLESSIS, H. & SAAYMAN,
E.J.L. 1991 . Basic chromosome numbers and polyploid levels in
some South African and Australian grasses (Poaceae). Bothalia
21: 163-170.
STACE. C.A. 1980. Plant taxonomy and biosystematics. Edward Arnold,
London.
Bothalia 24,2: 247-259(1994)
National Botanical Institute South Africa: list of staff and publications,
31st March 1994
compiler: B.A. MOMBERG
CHIEF DIRECTORATE
CAPE TOWN
Huntley, Prof. B.J. M.Sc. Chief Director
Davidson, D.C. Head: Graphic Services
Mirkin, Ms Y.A. Senior Typist/Receptionist
Ross, Ms S.I. Head: Communication and Promotions
Stafford, Ms D.L. Senior Secretary
COMMUNICATION AND PROMOTIONS— CAPE TOWN
Ross, Mrs S.I. Cert.Comm.Art, B.Fine Art
Box (nee Cupido), Mrs H.L. N.D. (Journalism). Communications Assistant
GRAPHIC SERVICES— CAPE TOWN
Davidson, D.C. B.A. (Hons.), PRISA Final Dipl.
Loedolff, Mrs J. B.Sc.(Ind.Tech.). Photographer/Illustrator
Sims, W.D. Graphics Assistant
ADMINISTRATION DIRECTORATE
CAPE TOWN
Jordaan, A.W. Adv.Dip.B & A. Director: Personnel and Finance
Comelissen, Mrs A.M. Secretary to the Board
Hughes, W.S.G. Head: Finance
Smuts, Mrs W.E. Head: Administration (Pretoria)
Van Zyl, J.M. Head: Personnel
ADMINISTRATION— PRETORIA
Smuts, Mrs W.E. Head: Administration
Gotzel, Mrs A. Senior Telecom. Operator
Joubert, Mrs I.J.M. Senior Administration Clerk
Kama, Mrs P.B. Administration Aid I
Kekana, Mrs M.R. Administration Aid I
Koehne, Mrs R.W.R. Senior Registration Clerk
Letebele, M.M. Groundsman I
Makgobola, Mrs M.R. Administration Aid I
Maphuta, Mrs M.S. Administration Aid I
Martin, Ms M.A. Senior Aministration Clerk
Nkosi, Mrs P.M. Administration Aid I
Phaala, M.C. Groundsman I
Phiri, Mrs E. Administration Aid I
Tloubatla, J.M. Courier/Photocopy Machine Operator
Venter, W.A. N2(Technical). Supervisor: Office Services
248
Bothalia 24,2 ( 1994)
FINANCE— CAPE TOWN
Hughes, W.S.G. B.Com., C.A.(SA) Deputy Director
Armitage, Mrs C.S. Senior Accountant Roman, D.C. Accounts Clerk: cashier
Kriel, Ms C.M.M. Senior Accounts Clerk: debtors Simon, Ms P.I. Assistant Accountant: creditors
Neuwirth, Ms E.V. Accountant: salaries Traut, G.D. Chief Accounts Clerk: salaries
October, A. Senior Accounts Clerk: salaries Yeomen, Ms I.N. Senior Accounts Clerk: creditors
Petersen, R.E. Senior Accounts Clerk: salaries
PERSONNEL— CAPE TOWN
Van Zyl, J.M. M.Econ. (Industrial Psychology). Assistant Director. Personnel
Barnard, Mrs A. Chief Telephonist/Receptionist
Blanche, J.G. Principal Personnel Officer: Administration
Crowie, A.C. Courier
Dollie, Mrs N.J. Administration Aid.
Eiman, Ms S.M. Typist
Haupt, Ms C.S. Administration Aid.
Mulder, Mrs G.P. Senior Typist
Nicholas, Mrs W.L. Photocopy Machine Operator
Oelofse, Ms V.S. Senior Personnel Clerk
Schutte, Mrs L.A.J. Senior Registration Clerk
Smith, Miss L.G. Chief Typist
Staal, P.B. Senior Personnel Practitioner: labour relations
Van Heerden, L.S. Personnel Officer: recruitment and
training
EDUCATION & INFORMATION DIRECTORATE
CAPE TOWN
Low, A.B. M.Sc. Director: Education & Information
Ashwell, Ms A.N. Head: Education
Leistner, O.A. Head: Publications (Pretoria)
Solomons, H.J. Senior Typist
EDUCATION
CAPE TOWN
Ashwell, Ms A.N. M.Ed. Assistant Director
Slattery, Mrs C.M. B. Sc. (Hons.), H.D.E. Education Officer
WITWATERSRAND
Van der Westhuizen, Mrs S. M.Sc. Education Officer
INFORMATION— PRETORIA
Joffe, Mrs H. B.Sc. Garden Utilization Officer
PUBLICATIONS— PRETORIA
Leistner, O.A. D.Sc., F.L.S. Assistant Director. Editing
Brink, Mrs S.S. Dip. (Typing). Chief Typesetter. Typeset- Momberg, Mrs B.A. B.Sc. (Entomology & Zoology).
ting, layout, word processing Technical editor. Editing, layout
Du Plessis, Mrs E. B.Sc. (Hons.), S.E.D. Technical editor. Mulvenna, Mrs J.M. Dip.(Typing). Principal Typist. Word
Editing, translating, layout processing, typesetting
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
249
GARDENS DIRECTORATE
CAPE TOWN
Botha, D.J. D.Sc. Director: Gardens
Behr, Ms C.M. Curator: Harold Porter NBG
Britz, R.M. Curator: Orange Free State NBG
Carstens, Mrs M.M. Secr.Dip. Senior Secretary
Chaplin, P.J. Curator: Witwatersrand NBG
Engelbrecht, B. Head: Support Services
Heilgendorff, J.P. Curator: Pretoria NBG
Kluge, J.P. Curator: Lowveld NBG
Oliver, I.B. Curator: Karoo NBG
Tarr, B.B. Curator: Natal NBG
Winter, J.H.S. Curator: Kirstenbosch NBG
PLANNING, MAINTENANCE & DEVELOPMENT— CAPE TOWN
Linde, D.C. N.T.C. (Technician and Inspector of Works). Control Works Inspector
Manasse, S.P. Dip. (Masonry). Artisan
Petersen, R.H.W. Artisan’s Assistant
HAROLD PORTER NBG— BETTY’S BAY
Behr, Ms C.M. B. Sc. (Hons.). Chief Research Technician
Abrahams, F. Groundsman I
Abrahamse, S.J. General Foreman
Forrester, J.A. N.T.C. IIl(Hort.). Senior Research Technician
Harper, C.C. Driver
Jacobs, L.H. Groundsman I
Martinka, A.G. Groundsman I
Rex, G. Groundsman I
Rex, P. Groundsman I
Van Coder, A.E. Groundsman I
Visser, C.J.J. Groundsman I
KAROO NBG— WORCESTER
Oliver, I.B. N.D.(Hort.), N.D.(PRA). Chief Research Technician
Dlikilili, N.S. Groundsman II
Kecela, S. Groundsman I
Kumeke, A.M. Groundsman I
Made, M.A. Groundsman I
Madumane, M. Groundsman I
Makubalo, F.N. Groundsman II
Makubalo, J. Groundsman I
Monisi, M.M. Groundsman I
Mpayipeli, W.W. Groundsman I
Mpeke, Mrs E.N. Groundswoman I
Mtetwa, A.M. General Foreman
Nkoloti, P.M. Groundsman I
Qumba, G.A. Groundsman I
Radebe, M.B. Groundsman II
Sibeko, L.A. Groundsman II
Sibozo, N.E. Driver
Simane, D.K. Senior Foreman
Smit, Mrs A.C. Senior Administration Clerk
Theoha, P.P. Groundsman II
Townsend, D.J. N.D.(Hort.). Senior Research Tech-
nician
Tuswa, M.H. Groundsman I
Viljoen, D.M. N.D.(Hort.) Senior Research Technician
Yekiso, S.M. Groundsman I
KIRSTENBOSCH NBG— CAPE TOWN
Winter, J.H.S. N.D.(Hort.). Deputy Director
CENTRAL
Arends, Miss L.D. Aministration Clerk. Plant recording Geduldt, D.C. Engraver
Berman, R.C. Groundsman I Goliath, L. Administration Aid
De Jonge, Miss K. Senior Typist Grace, T. Senior Storeman/Senior Admininstration
De Kock, Mrs M.E. Aministration Aid Haynie, R. Groundsman I. Workshop
Ficks, T.E. Driver Jacobs, A.P. Information Officer
Fredericks, Miss N.C.E. Aministration Aid Jacobs, F.H. Storeman
250
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
Jacobs, K.C. General Foreman
Jansen, K.J. Driver
Labuschagne, Mrs C.E. B. Sc. (Hons.). Education Officer
Marent, Mrs H.C. Sen. Administration Clerk. Plant recording
McLean, N.S. Groundsman I. Workshop
Newman, W. Driver. Workshop
Petersen, F.J. Driver
Petersen, V.E.M. Aministration Aid
Trautman, C.E. Artisan/Supervisor. Workshop
Williams, G.C. Groundsman I
Williams, W.P. Senior Foreman. Drivers
Woodward, Ms J. Senior Administration Clerk
GARDEN
Abrahams, J.E. Groundsman I
Adonis, A. General Foreman. Ericas
Adonis, J.J.M. Groundsman F Dell
Adonis, M. Groundsman I. New development
Adams, H. Groundsman I. New development
August, T. Groundsman I
Balabala, L. Groundsman 1. Dell
Boonzaaier, I. Groundsman I. Goldfields EEC
Bowler, M.A. Groundsman I. Annuals
De Kock, M. Groundsman I. Protea development
Eksteen, M. Groundsman E General garden
Hendricks, S. Groundsman I. Proteas
Jacobs, D.R. Groundsman I
Jansen, W. Groundsman I. Annuals
January, C. Groundsman I
Jenkins, A. Groundsman I. New development
Josephus, D.N. Groundsman I
Loft, G.E. Groundsman I. Proteas
Lukas, K. Groundsman I. General garden
Manuel, D.R. Groundsman I. Annuals
McKlein, M.L. Groundsman I
McLean, M.L. Groundsman I
Mitchells, G. Senior General Foreman. Estate & trails
Morris, J.N.M. Groundsman I. Proteas
Petersen, A. General Foreman. Cycads
Philander, N. Groundsman I. New development
Philips, R. Groundsman I
Pietersen, J. Groundsman 1. New development
Plaatjies, S.D. Groundsman I. Proteas
Ruiters, M. Groundsman I. New development
Sauls, K. Groundsman I. Annuals
Sampson, R. Groundsman I. General garden
Smith, A.E. Groundsman I
Solomons, E.A. Groundsman I. Proteas
Solomons, K.J. Groundsman I. Proteas
Van der Westhuizen, A.J. General Foreman. Proteas
Van Rooy, K. General Foreman. Annuals
Van Schalkwyk, J. Groundsman I
Van Wyk, F. Groundsman I. Annuals
Van Wyk, N. Groundsman I
Williams, M.L.J. Groundsman I. New development
ESTATE
Le Roux, P.H. Chief Research Technician. Estate Manager
Abrahams, M. Groundsman I. Estate & trails
Adams, J. Groundsman I. Estate & trails
Adonis, S.J. Groundsman I. Aliens
Andrews, M.M. Groundsman I. Estate & trails
Baadjies, I. Groundsman I. Estate & trails
Bezuidenhout, A.K. Groundsman I. General maintenance
Bouwers, G.G. Groundsman I. Construction
Button, J. Groundsman I. Estate & trails
Claasen, F. Groundsman I. Aliens
Dollie, Y. Groundsman I. Estate & trails
Fienies, C. Groundsman I. General maintenance
Filand, A.J. Groundsman E Estate & trails
Geswind, A.J. Groundsman 1. Lawnmowers
Hope, C. Groundsman I. Construction
Isaacs, M. Groundsman I. Aliens
Jackson, P. Groundsman I. Lawnmowers
Jacobs, M.D. Groundsman I. Estate & trails
Jaftha, R. Groundsman I. General maintenance
Jaftha, W.R. Groundsman I. Construction
Kayster, G.J. General Foreman. Construction
Kuscus, G.W. General Foreman. General maintenance
Mathews, N. Groundsman I. Aliens
Matthews, I.N. General Foreman. Estate & trails
McLean, A. Groundsman I. Aliens
McLean, N. Groundsman I. Aliens
Mitchells, R. Groundsman I. Aliens
Petersen, J. Groundsman I. Aliens
Petersen, N.H. Groundsman I. Construction
Plaatjies, M.P. Groundsman I. Estate & trails
Reed, T.W. Groundsman I. Estate & trails
Rhode, W.C. Groundsman I. Estate & trails
Sampson, J. General Foreman. Aliens
Solomons, G. Groundsman I. Aliens
Solomons, S. Groundsman I. Construction
Van Gusling, E.J. General Foreman. Lawnmowers
NURSERY
Saunders, R.C. N.T.C.IIKHort). Chief Research Technician. Head: Nursery
Adams, G. Groundsman I
Adams, H. General Foreman. Plant utilization
Adonis, M. Groundsman I. Nursery
Apolis, A. Groundsman 1
August, C. Groundsman I. Seed room
Beran, J. Horticultural student
Carrol, R.R. Groundsman I. Plant sales
Crous, H.T. Research Technician
Crowie (nee Pick), Mrs U.M. Administration Aid. Seed room
Daniels, A. Groundsman I. Plant sales
Davids, J. Groundsman I. Seed room
Davids, M.I. General Foreman
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
251
Davids, N. Groundsman I. Plant sales
Davids, S. Groundsman I. Nursery
Duncan, G.D. N.D.(Hort.). Principal Research Technician
Francis, J. Groundsman I. Plant utilization
Hickey, B. Horticultural student
Hendricks, B. Horticultural student
Hitchcock, A.N. N.D.(Hort.), N.H.D.(Hort-). Senior Re-
search Technician
Jacobs, C.W. Groundsman I. Nursery
Jacobs, E.C. Groundsman I. Seed room
Jacobs, H.C. Security
Jacobs, K. Groundsman 1
Jamieson, Mrs H.G. N.D. (Parks & Recreation). Research
Technician
Julie, V. Groundsman I. Plant sales
Kettledas, P.G. Groundsman I. Nursery
King, O. Groundsman I. Nursery
Koma, B. Groundsman I. Succulents
Kotze, F.G. N.T.C.IlKHort.). Principal Research Tech-
nician
Lawrence, E. Groundsman E Plant sales
Lewin, T.B. Groundsman E Nursery
Manuel, I.P. General Foreman. Seed room
Marthinus, E. Groundsman 1. Succulents
Matthews, Z. Groundsman I. Plant sales
Notten, Miss A.L. Senior Research Technician. Seed room
Powrie, Miss F.J. B. Sc. (Hons.), N.D. (Hort.). Senior Re-
search Technician
Rudolph, A. Security
Sardien, T.P. General Foreman. Succulents
Sauls, C.J. Groundsman I. Nursery
Smith, D. Groundsman I. Seed room
Solomons, T. General Foreman. Security
Tamboer, J.S. General Foreman. Nursery
Van der Walt, Mrs L.E. N.D.(Hort.). Research Technician
Van Jaarsveld, E.J. M.Sc., N.D.(Hort.). Chief Research
Technician
Van Rooyen, Miss S. Administration Aid. Seed room
LOWVELD — NELSPRUIT
Kluge, J.P. B. Sc. (Hons.), T.H.O.D. Chief Research Technician
Froneman, W.C. N.D.(Nature Conservation & Management),
N.D.(Parks & Recreation Admin.), N.T.C.IlKHort.).
Principal Research Technician
Hurter, P.J.H. B.Sc. Senior Research Technician
Khoza, D.E. Groundsman I
Khoza, F.D. Groundsman I
Khumalo, N.S. Groundsman I
Khumalo, S.S. Groundsman I
Magagula, K.E. Groundsman I
Magagula, N.R. Groundsman I
Mahlahlubane, F.J. Groundsman I
Makamo, Mrs J.E. Groundswoman I
Makhubela, B.J. Groundsman I
Mantseke, N.A. Groundsman I
Maqungo, Miss V.L.B. Groundswoman I
Mazibuko, F.E. Groundsman I
Mdhluli, M.B. Groundsman I
Mdluli, M.E. Groundsman I
Mdluli, S. Groundsman I
Mkhatshwa, Mrs N.S. Groundswoman I
Mteto, E.M. Groundsman I
Muswili, K.J. Groundsman I
Ngomane, S. Groundsman I
Ngqani, Mrs L.S. Groundswoman I
Ngwengoma, P.N. Groundsman I
Ngwenya, P.S. Groundsman I
Ngwenyama, K.A. Groundsman I
Ngwenyama, M.M. Groundsman I
Nkosi, M.P. Groundsman I
Nkosi. Mrs P.B. Groundswoman I
Nkosi, Mrs S.L. Groundswoman I
Nyathi. R.M. Groundsman I
Shabangu, M.E. Groundsman I
Shabangu, S.L. Groundsman I
Shabangu. W.N. Groundsman I
Shawe, S.A. General Foreman
Sibule, B.F. Groundsman 1
Sibure, M.E. Groundsman I
Sibure, W.F. Groundsman I
Sigudla, B.M. Groundsman I
Soka, M.P. Groundsman I
Thabethe, S.S. Groundsman I
Van der Walt, Mrs G.A. Senior Administration Clerk
NATAL NBG— PIETERMARITZBURG
Tarr, B.B. N.D. (Parks & Recreation Admin.), Advanced Dip. (Adult Education).
Chief Research Technician
Busani, M.A. Driver
Dladla, P. Groundsman I
Dlamini, N.S. Groundsman I. Nursery foreman
Dlungwane, R. General Foreman
Gabuza, A. Groundsman I
Gates, Ms J.E. N.D.( Hort. ), N.D.(Parks & Recreation Admin. ).
Principal Horticulturist. Kniphofia , forest spp.
Kistner, H.A. N.D. (Hort.)
Mbense, A. Groundsman I. Machine operator
Mdluli. K. Groundsman I
Mkize, M. Groundsman I
Mncwabe, Ms A. Groundswoman I
Mncwave, P. Groundsman I
Mpangase, Z. Groundsman I
Mpulo. D.H. Groundsman I
Mthalane, A. Groundsman I
Mtolo, C. Groundsman II. Team leader
Nkabini, A. Groundsman I
Nzakwe. W. Groundsman I
Radebe. A. Groundsman I
Van der Merwe, Ms M.E.H. Senior Administration
Clerk
Zimu, J. Groundsman I
Zimu, S. Groundsman I
252
Bothalia 24,2 ( 1994)
Zondi, Ms B.P. Groundswoman I Zuma, J, Groundsman I
Zondo, Z. Groundsman ] Zuma, Ms K. Groundswoman I
ORANGE FREE STATE NBG— BLOEMFONTEIN
Britz, R.M. N.D. (Forestry). Chief Research Technician
Eysele, Mrs J.P. Senior Administration Clerk
Lekheto, M.J. Groundsman II. Maintenance
Lekheto, T.S. Groundsman I. Nursery
Lumley, M.J. Principal Research Technician. Nursery
Mbolekwa, G.M. Groundsman I. Grass garden
Mbolekwa, L.M. Groundsman II. Rhus, display
Mofokeng, J.M. Groundsman I. Nursery
Mofokeng, M.S. Groundsman I. Entrance
Mohokare, L.J. Driver
Mohapi, Mrs M.A. Food Services Aid I
Moima, T.J. Groundsman I. Maintenance
Mopeli, M.J. Groundsman I. Bulb area
Moticoe, Mrs M.A. Groundswoman I. Braai area
Nakanyane, R.B. General Foreman
Nakedi, N.J. Groundsman I. Estate paths
Olifant, D.M. Groundsman I. Kiosk area
Rampai, M.A. Groundsman I. Maintenance
Sebolai, Mrs C.L. Groundswoman I
Sebolai, P.R.A.N. Groundsman II. Nursery, tools main-
tenance
Semenyane, T.D. Groundsman I. Maintenance
Thaele, Mrs M.E. Groundswoman. Seed room nursery
PRETORIA NBG
Heilgendorff, J.P. N.H.D.(Hort-). Chief Research Technician
Baloi, R.F. Groundsman I
Baloyi, K.J. Groundsman I
Baloyi, S.J. Driver/Operator
Baloyi, S.M. Records Clerk
Chipi, S. Security Assistant
Chuma, S.J. Security Assistant
Dry, D.H. N.D.(Hort.). Chief Research Technician. PRO and
Groups. Technical papers on horticulture and plants
Kemp, J. Groundsman I
Keyter, B.A. Senior Security Officer
Klapwijk, N.A. N.D.(Hort.), N.D.(Plant Prod.), N.D.( Diesel
Fitting). First Research Technician. Maintenance, plan-
ning and construction of N and S garden
Lephera, J. Groundsman I
Letsoalo, H.M. Groundsman I
Mabasa, J.R. Security Assistant
Mabasa, P.P. Groundsman I
Mabunda, Z.S. Groundsman 1
Machika, S.M. Groundsman I
Mahlangu, J..I. Groundsman I
Makena, M.S. Driver/Operator
Makena, S.N. General Foreman
Makena, T.J. Groundsman I
Makgopo, C.K. Groundsman I
Makhubela, D. General Foreman
Makhubela, K.P. Groundsman I
Makoeng, P.T. Groundsman I
Makola, J. Groundsman I
Makola, L.M. Groundsman II. Tractor driver
Makua, E.G. Groundsman I
Malewa, D. Groundsman I
Malobola, L. Groundsman I
Malobola, M. Groundsman II
Maluleke, M.J. Security
Mametja, A. Groundsman I
Mariri, N.J. Factotum
Marule, P.M. Groundsman II. Tractor driver
Masango, M.G. Groundsman I
Mathabathe, D.S. Groundsman I
Matlala, S.M. Groundsman I
Matshika, S.P. Groundsman I
Mmakujwana, K.J. Groundsman I
Mnyangeni, L.D. Groundsman I
Modisha, D.M. Groundsman I
Mogoru, M.F. Groundsman I
Mogoru, S. Groundsman I
Mohale, F.R. General Foreman
Mohale, J.N. Groundsman I
Mokawe, N.R. Groundsman I
Molefe, J.R. Groundsman II
Molokomme, J. Groundsman I
Molomo, S.E. Groundsman I
Mononyane, J.B. Groundsman I
Motshweni, V. Groundsman I
Msisa, S.K. Groundsman I
Mudau, R.T. Groundsman I
Muhali, B. Groundsman I
Niemandt, M. Artisan
Nkambule, J. Groundsman I
Nkoane, J.M. Groundsman I
Nkwana, F.N. Driver/Operator
Noko, J.M. Research Assistant
Noku, A.Y. Groundsman II. Tractor driver
Ramakgaphola, A.M. Groundsman I
Ramatsetse, P.M. Security Assistant
Rampopana, A.M. Groundsman I
Sete, L. General Foreman
Shirindi, J.R. Groundsman I
Shirindi, S.M. Groundsman I
Shilubane, E. Storeman Assistant
Sithole, J. Groundsman I
Strydom, D.J.F. N.T.C.III(Hort.), N.D. (Parks & Rec.
Management), Chief Research Technician. Cultiva-
tion of mass plants, plant sales, cycads
Swartz, Ms P. M.Sc. Senior Horticulturist. Scientific and
horticultural curation of living collections; garden
development; seedbank of endangered plants and
succulents; Madagascan plants
Tefu, P.R. Groundsman I
Tloubatla, J.L. Groundsman I
Tolo, P.K. Groundsman I
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
253
WITWATERSRAND NBG— WILROPARK
Chaplin, P.J. N.T.C.Dip.(Hort.). Chief Research Technician
Bongwe, N.W. Groundsman I. Machine operator
Hankey, A.J. N.D.(Hort.). Senior Research Techni-
cian
Head, Mrs S.E. Senior Administration Clerk
Khedzi, K.P. Groundsman I. Nursery
Lukhwa, N.A. Groundsman i. Garden
Luvhimbi, T.S. Groundsman I. Garden
Majamane, Z.E. Groundsman I. Garden
Mamosebo, M.A. Groundsman I. Garden
Manyikana, T.M. Groundsman E Garden
Matsea, M.W. Groundsman I. Garden
Mbulaheni, N.P. Groundsman I. Garden
Mulibana, N.S. Groundsman I. Machine operator
Mmola, Ms B.E. Groundswoman I. Cleaner
Ndou, A.P. Groundsman E Garden
Ndou, M.W. Groundsman 1. Machine operator
Ndwambi, N.W. Groundsman E Garden
Ndzondo, N.L. Groundsman IE Clerical Assistant
Nedambale, M.P. Groundsman II. Nursery
Nemalili, M.E. Driver
Nemalili, A.S. Groundsman II. Driver
Nekhavhambe, S.P. Groundsman I. Garden
Nenungwi, M.S. Groundsman I. Nursery
Ngwenya, H.T. Groundsman I. Garden
Rammela, N.N. Groundsman I. Machine operator
Randima, M. Groundsman I. Garden
Raphalalani, V.S. Groundsman I. Nursery
Ravhuhali, P.W. Groundsman I. Garden
Steel, Miss B.S. N.D. (Nature Conservation), N.D. (Parks
& Recreation Admin.), Dip. (Journalism). Senior
Research Technician. Nursery, succulent and herb
gardens, plant records
Tebeile, Ms Z.M. Groundswoman II. Clerical Assistant
Tshisikule, G.M. Groundsman I. Garden
Van der Westhuizen, Mrs S. M.Sc. Environmental Educa-
tionalist
RESEARCH DIRECTORATE
PRETORIA
Director: Research — Vacant
Meyer, Ms M.C. Dip.Gim.Man. Personal Secretary
Saayman, Mrs E.J.L. M.Sc. Scientific Liaison Officer. Cytotaxonomy
PLANT SYSTEMATICS SUBDIRECTORATE
PRETORIA
Smith, G.F. Ph.D., F.L.S. Deputy Director. Systematics of succulents and rosulate, petaloid monocots
Arnold, T.H. Head: Data Management (Pretoria)
Du Plessis, Mrs H. Head: Research Support Services (Pretoria)
Koekemoer, Miss M. Curator: National Herbarium (Pretoria)
Oliver, E.G.H. Curator: Stellenbosch Herbarium
Rourke, Dr J.P. Curator: Compton Herbarium (Cape Town)
Williams, Ms R. Curator: Natal Herbarium (Durban)
DATA MANAGEMENT— PRETORIA
Arnold, T.H. M.Sc. Assistant Director. Computer application especially in taxonomy
De Wet, Mrs B.C. B. Sc. (Computer Science), B.A., Harris, Mrs B.J. Encoding, quality control
H.D.L.S. Datametrician Joubert, Mrs M.A.E. Senior Data Typist
Evenwel, Mrs E. Quality control
MARY GUNN LIBRARY— PRETORIA
Potgieter, Mrs E. B.Bibl. Senior Librarian
Coetzer, Mrs H.J. B.A. Library Assistant
254
Bothalia 24,2 ( 1994)
COMPTON HERBARIUM— CAPE TOWN
Rourke, J.P. Ph.D., F.L.S. Specialist Scientist. Systematics of southern African Proteaceae, Stilbaceae
Cupido, Mrs C. Administration Aid
Foster, Mrs S.E. Principal Typist
Holm, Mrs K. Scientific Assistant
Kurzweil, H. Ph.D. Scientist. Systematics of southern
African terrestrial orchids
Manning, J.C. Ph.D. Specialist Scientist. Systematics of Irida-
ceae and Orchidaceae, cladistics and biogeography
Paterson-Jones, Mrs D.A. (nee Snijman). Ph.D. Scientist.
Systematics of Amaryllidaceae
Roux, J.P. N.T.C.(Hort.), F.L.S. , M.Sc. Scientist. Sys-
tematics of Pteridophyta
Steiner, K.E. Ph.D. Specialist Scientist. Systematics of
Scrophulariaceae and evolutionary interactions be-
tween oil-secreting flowers and oil-collecting bees
NATAL HERBARIUM— DURBAN
Williams, Ms R. B. Sc. (Hons.), H.D.E. Curator. Scientific Officer
De Jager, P.J. M.Sc. Ethnobotanist
Mbonambi, M.B. Groundsman I. Gardener
Ngwenya, M. A. Herbarium Assistant. Plant identification,
plant information
Noble, Mrs H-E. Administration Clerk
Nzimande, S.B. Groundsman I
Sikhakhane, T.B. Herbarium Assistant. Plant identifica-
tions. herbarium services
Singh. Ms Y. B.Sc.(Hons.), H.E.D. Senior Scientific Officer.
Taxonomy of Zantedeschia , plant identifications
NATIONAL HERBARIUM— PRETORIA
Koekemoer, Miss M. M.Sc. Curator. Principal Scientist.
Taxonomy of Poaceae, Asteraceae; Disparago and related genera
Germishuizen, G. Assistant Curator: Finances.
M.Sc. Scientist. Plant identifications, taxonomy of Polygonaceae, Fabaceae, Loranthaceae, Viscaceae
Herman, P.P.J. Assistant Curator: Personnel.
M.Sc. Scientific Officer. Taxonomy of Rubiaceae-Asteraceae, Flora of Transvaal
Heymann, Mrs M.Z. Assistant Curator: Services. T.E.Dip.
Meyer, Mrs N.L. Assistant Curator: Public relations.
B. Sc. (Hons.). Scientific Officer. Taxonomy of Liliaceae
Anderson, H.M. Ph.D. Scientist. Palaeobotany, palaeo-
geography
Anderson, J.M. Ph.D. Specialist Scientist. Palaeobotany,
palaeogeography
Archer, R.H. M.Sc. Scientific Officer. Taxonomy of main-
ly Celastraceae, Euphorbiaceae
Archer (nee Reid) Mrs C. Scientist. Taxon of Cyperaceae,
Restionaceae, Orchidaceae
Bredenkamp, Mrs C.L. M.Sc. Scientific Officer. Taxon-
omy of Vitex, Rhamnaceae, Sterculiaceae and other
related families
Burgoyne, Ms P.M. B. Sc. (Hons.). Scientific Assistant
Cloete, Mrs M. Dip. (Typing). Label typist
Dreyer, Miss L.L. M.Sc. Scientific Officer. Taxonomy of
Geraniaceae, Crassulaceae, Oxalidaceae
Fish, Mrs L. B.Sc. Scientific Officer. Taxonomy of Poa-
ceae; plant collecting programme
Glen, H.F. Ph.D. Scientist. Taxonomy of trees and suc-
culents, especially Aloe, also cultivated plants
Glen, Mrs R.P. M.Sc. Scientific Assistant. Taxonomy of
ferns, water plants
Hartzer, Mrs P.C.M.H. M.Sc. Scientific Officer. Taxonomy
of Mesembryanthemaceae
Hobson, Ms S.R. B.Sc., B. Prim. Ed. Scientific Officer.
Taxonomy of Asclepiadaceae, Lobelia
Jordaan, Mrs M. B.Sc. (Hons.). Scientific Officer. Taxon-
omy of Casuarinaceae-Connaraceae
Kgaditsi, W.T. Herbarium Assistant
Lephaka, M.G. Herbarium Assistant. Parcelling and pressing
Makgakga, M.C. Scientific Assistant
Makgakga, S.K. Scientific Assistant. Mounting, her-
barium specimens, spirit collection
Meyer, J.J. N.D. (Teaching). Scientific Assistant
Perold, Mrs S.M. Ph.D. Scientist. Taxonomy of Ric-
ciaceae, Hepaticae
Phahla, T.J. Herbarium Assistant. Mounting herbarium
specimens
Ready (nee Taussig), Mrs J.A. N.D.(Hort.). Scientific Assis-
tant
Retief, Miss E. M.Sc. Scientist. Pollen studies of Boragin-
aceae. Taxonomy of Boraginaceae, Verbenaceae,
Lamiaceae, Asteraceae
Rossouw, G.L. Scientific Assistant
Smithies, Mrs S.J. M.Sc. Senior Scientific Officer. Taxon-
omy of mainly Scrophulariaceae, Selaginaceae, Lo-
beliaceae
Van Rooy, J. M.Sc. Scientist. Taxonomy and biogeo-
graphy of mosses
Van Wyk, Mrs C.M. M.Sc. Scientist. Taxonomy of Rut-
aceae, Thymelaeaceae, Apiaceae, Ericaceae, Melo-
lobium, Pelargonium
Veldman, Mrs J.M. Administration Clerk
Victor, Ms J.E. B.Sc. (Hons.), H.Dip.Journ. Scientific Of-
ficer. Taxonomy of Proteaceae, Bruniaceae, Rosa-
ceae, Rutaceae
Welman, Miss W.G. M.Sc. Scientist. Taxonomy of Con-
volvulaceae, Solanaceae, Cucurbitaceae, Campa-
nulaceae, Asteraceae, Acanthaceae
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
255
STELLENBOSCH HERBARIUM
Oliver, E.G.H. M.Sc. Curator. Scientist. Taxonomy of the Ericoideae (Ericaceae)
Beyers, Mrs J.B.P. M.Sc. Scientist. Taxonomy of the Fellingham, Mrs A. C. B. Sc. Scientific Officer. Taxonomy
Gnidieae (Thymelaeaceae) of Cliffortia (Rosaceae)
Davidse, Mrs E. Scientific Assistant Leith, Mrs J. Administration Clerk
RESEARCH SUPPORT SERVICES— PRETORIA
Du Plessis, Mrs H. M.Sc. Head of Cost Centre. Scientist. Cytogenetics
Botha, Mrs A.G. Scientific Assistant. Anatomy
Condy, Ms G.S. M.A. Botanical artist
Romanowski, Mrs A.J. Dip. (Photography). Industrial
Technician (Photography). Scientific photogra-
phy
Roux, Mrs W.J.G. Dip. (Private Secretary). Scientific As-
sistant. Graphic artist, biology
Steyn, Miss C.C. Scientific Assistant. Anatomy
Steyn, Mrs E.M.A. Ph.D. Senior Scientist. Embryology
Thiart, Mrs S.M. Dip. (Typing). Principal Typist
ECOLOGY SUBDIRECTORATE
CAPE TOWN
Rutherford, M.C. Ph.D., Dip.(Datamet.). Deputy Director
STRESS ECOLOGY— UCT RONDEBOSCH
Rutherford, M.C. Programme Leader. Stress and disturbance ecology
Davis, G.W. Ph.D. Scientist. Ecophysiology, resource
modelling
De Witt, D.M. Scientific Assistant
Fritz, M.F. Scientific Assistant
Hoffman, M.T. Ph.D. Scientist. Disturbance ecology,
desertification, photography
Hunter, Ms D.A. Administrative secretary
Hurford, J.L. M.Sc. Scientific Officer. Conservation biology
Jagger, B.W. Scientific Assistant
Midgley, G.F. M.Sc. Scientist. Plant stress physiology/
ecology
Musil, C.F. Ph.D. Scientist. Aquatic and terrestrial plant
ecophysiology
O'Callaghan, M.G. Ph.D. Scientist. Wetlands, salt mar-
shes, coastal vegetation
Powrie, L.W. M.Sc. Scientist. Karoo ecology, education,
computer programming/operations
Wand, S.J.E. M.Sc.(Agric.). Scientist. Ecophysiology
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY— CAPE TOWN
Donaldson, J.S. M.Sc. (Entomology), Ph.D. (Zoology). Assistant Director. Programme Leader,
Cycad biology, plant/insect interactions, conservation biology
Botha, P.A. N.H.D.(Hort.). Scientific Officer. Tissue cul-
ture research
Bowler, Mrs M. Administration Aid
Brown, N.A.C. Ph.D. Specialist Scientist. Seed biology
research, plant growth regulators
De Lange, J.H. B.Sc.(Hort.), M.Sc. (Plant Physiology),
D.Sc.(Agric.), Ph.D.(Bot.). Specialist Scientist.
Ecology, tissue culture, horticulture
Hilton-Taylor, C. B.Sc.(Hons.)(Biological Sci.). Assistant
Scientist. Threatened plants, biodiversity of arid
regions
McDonald, D.J. M.Sc. Scientist. Wetlands, salt marshes,
coastal vegetation, mountain vegetation
Nanni, Ms E B.Sc., H.E.D. Scientific Officer. Ecology,
seed biology
Parenzee, Ms H.A. Administrative Assistant
Rebelo, A.G. Ph.D. (Zoology). Scientist. Conservation
biology, biogeography
Scott, Mrs G. B.Sc. (Pharmacy), M.Sc. Scientific Officer.
Plant secondary compounds, medicinal plants
HARRY MOLTENO LIBRARY— CAPE TOWN
Reynolds, Ms P.Y. B.A., H.D.L.S., B.Proc. Senior Librarian
256
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
PUBLICATIONS BY THE STAFF
(1st April 1993 — 3 1st March 1994)
ANDERSON, J.M, & ANDERSON, H.M. 1993a. Terrestrial flora and
fauna of the Gondwana Triassic: Part 1 — Occurrences. In S.G.
Lucas & M. Morales, The nonmarine Triassic. New Mexico
Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 3: 3-12.
ANDERSON. J.M. & ANDERSON, H.M. 1993b. Terrestrial flora and
fauna of the Gondwana Triassic: Part 2 — Co-evolution. In S.G.
Lucas & M. Morales, The nonmarine Triassic. New Mexico
Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 3: 1 3-25.
ARCHER. R.H. & VAN WYK, A.E. 1993a. Wood structure and generic
status of some southern African Cassinoideae (Celastraceae).
/ 'AW A Journal 14: 373-389.
ARCHER, R.H. & VAN WYK, A.E. 1993b. Checklist of the vascular
plants of the Kouga-Baviaanskloof Wilderness area. PlantLife 9:
25-31.
ARNOLD, T.H. & DE WET, B.C. (eds) 1993. Plants of southern Africa:
names and distribution. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South
Africa No. 62.
ASHWELL, A.N. 1993a. Kirstenbosch National Botanical Garden.
Environmental Resource Guide Series, Teachers’ Guide No. 2.
EKKO, Kleinmond.
ASHWELL, A.N. 1993b. Promoting an environmental ethic: environ-
mental education. In W. van Warmelo, Environmental implica-
tions of informal housing. Habitat Council Symposium
Proceedings, Cape Town.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. & BOTHA, D.J. 1993. A synopsis of the genus
VitexL. (Verbenaceae) in southern Africa. South African Journal
of Botany 59: 61 1-622.
BRITS, G.J., CALITZ, F.J., BROWN, N.A.C. & MANNING, J.C. 1993.
Desiccation as the active principle in heat-stimulated seed ger-
mination of Leucospermum R. Br. (Proteaceae) in fynbos. The
New Phytologist 125: 397^-03.
BROWN, N.A.C. 1993. Increase wildflower potential with stimulation
of fynbos seed germination by plant-derived smoke. Parks and
Grounds 73 June/July: 48, 49.
BROWN, N.A.C., BOTHA, P.A., KOTZE, G. & JAMIESON, H. 1993.
Where there’s smoke, there’s seed: plant-derived smoke as an
important natural ‘cue’ for the germination of fynbos seed. Veld
& Flora 79: 77-79.
BROWN, N.A.C., KOTZE, G. & BOTHA, P.A. 1993. The promotion of
seed germination of Cape Erica species by plant-derived smoke.
Seed Science and Technology 21: 573-580.
BROWN, N.A.C. & SPENCER-JONES, H. 1994. Besser keimen im
Rauch. GEO 2: 156, 157.
DAVIS, G.W. 1993a. Don't underestimate dekriet. Farmer's Weekly
83046 Nov. 12: 52,53.
DAVIS, G.W. 1993b. Democratic restructuring of ecology in South
Africa. Bulletin of the South African Institute of Ecology 1 2,2: 1 .
DAVIS, G.W. 1993c. Polls, people and projects: ecology and environ-
mental science into the New South Africa. Bulletin of the South
African Institute of Ecology 12,3: I.
DAVIS, G.W. 1993d. Sitting on the dock oflhe bay: pondering editorial
privilege. Bulletin of the South African Institute of Ecology 1 3, 1 :
1,2.
DAVIS, G.W. 1 994. Stirring the biodiversity pot with a functional spoon.
A reportback on the SCOPE/UNEP meeting at Asilomar, Califor-
nia, February 27-March 3, 1994. Bulletin of the South African
Institute of Ecology 13,1: 1 9-24.
DE LANGE, J.H. & BOUCHER, C. 1993a. Autecological studies on
Audouiniu capitata (Bruniaceae). 4. Seed production, seed banks
and seedling recruitment. South African Journal of Botany 59:
145-155.
DE LANGE, J.H. & BOUCHER, C. 1993b. Autecological studies on
Audouinia capitata (Bruniaceae). 8. Role of fire in regeneration.
South African Journal of Botany 59: 188-202.
DE LANGE, J.H. & BOUCHER, C. 1993c. Stimulation of in vitro
pollination in Audouinia capitata by the simultaneous use of
several carbohydrates. South African Journal of Botany 59: 270-
272.
DE LANGE, J.H., BOUCHER, C. & VAN DER WALT, J.J.A. 1993.
Autecological studies on Audouinia capitata (Bruniaceae). 3.
Pollination biology. South African Journal of Botany 59: 1 35—
144.
DE LANGE, J.H., THOMPSON, G.R. & SWART, C.R. 1993.
Autecological studies On Audouinia capitata (Bruniaceae). 7.
Nutritional aspects in the mature seed. South African Journal of
Botany 59: 178-187.
DE LANGE, J.H., VAN DER WALT, J.J.A. & BOUCHER, C. 1993a.
Autecological studies on Audouinia capitata (Bruniaceae). 5.
Seed development, abortion and pre-emergent reproductive suc-
cess. South African Journal of Botany 59: 1 56-167.
DE LANGE, J.H., VAN DER WALT, J.J.A. & BOUCHER, C. 1993b.
Autecological studies on Audouinia capitata (Bruniaceae). 6.
Nutritional aspects of the developing ovule. South African Jour-
nal of Botany 59: 168-177.
DONALDSON, J.S. 1993a. Mast seeding in the cycad genus En-
cephalartos : a test of the predator satiation hypothesis. Oecologia
94:262-271.
DONALDSON, J.S. 1993b. Insect predation of ovules in the South
African species of Encephalcirtos (Cycadales: Zamiaceae). In
D.W. Stevenson & K. Norstog, Proceedings of Cycad '90. the
Second International Conference on Cycad Biology. Palm and
Cycad Societies of Australia, Milton, Australia.
DREYER, L.L. & GERMISHUIZEN, G. 1993. Geraniaceae. In T.H.
Arnold & B.C. de Wet, Plants of southern Africa: names and
distribution. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No.
62.
DRY, D.H. 1993a. The wild seringa, Burkeana africana. Veld & Flora
79: 107.
DRY, D.H. 1993b. Inheemse eetbare vrugte.D/eS.A. Kweker, June 1993:
30.
DUNCAN, G.D. 1993a. Lachenalia thomasiae. The Flowering Plants of
Africa 52: t. 2061.
DLINCAN, G.D. 1993b. Agapanthus dyeri. The Flowering Plants of
Africa 52: t. 2062.
DUNCAN, G.D. 1993c. Wild irises for the garden. Veld & Flora 79:
74-76.
DUNCAN, G.D. 1993d. Kirstenbosch exhibits at the Hampton Court
Flower Show. Veld & Flora 79: 1 13.
FELLINGHAM, A.C. 1993a. Observations on Cliffortia micrantha
(Rosaceae). Bothalia 23: 65, 66.
FELLINGHAM, A.C. 1993b. Cliffortia fasciculata, a superfluous name
for C. amplexistipula. Bothalia 23: 67, 68.
FISH, L. 1994. The National Plant Collecting Programme — why the
National Herbarium, Pretoria (PRE) needs amateur collectors.
PlantLife 10: 16, 17.
GERMISHUIZEN, G. 1993. Loranthaceae, Viscaceae, Polygonaceae
and Fabaceae. In T.H. Arnold & B.C. de Wet, Plants of southern
Africa: names and distribution. Memoirs of the Botanical Sun’ey
of South Africa No. 62.
GLEN, H.F. 1 993. Aloe ukambensis. The Flowering Plants of Africa 52:
t. 2064.
GLEN, H.F. & CRAIB, C. 1993. Aloe haemanthifolia. The Flowering
Plants of Africa 52: t. 2063.
GLEN, H.F. & HARDY, D.S. 1993a. Aloe meyeri. The Flowering Plants
of Africa 52: t. 2065.
GLEN, H.F. & HARDY, D.S. 1993b. Aloe veseyi. The Flowering Plants
of Africa 52: t. 2066.
GLEN, H.F. ( 1 992) 1 994. Trees on the Golden Mile. Trees in South Africa
43: 46-53.
GLEN, H.F. & HARDY, D.S. ( 1 992) 1 994. Baobabs: fathers of the forest.
Trees in South Africa 43: 38—44.
GLEN, H.F., KOEKEMOER, M„ SMITH, G.F. & ROURKE, J.P. 1993.
Herbaria, collections and collectors. Transfers of collections
between South African herbaria. Taxon 42: 729, 730.
GLEN, H.F., SMITH, G.F. & OLIVER, E.G.H. 1993. Letters: Maintain-
ing links with the past — South African botanists at Kew. Veld &
Flora 79: 93, 94.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 1993a. Ixia acaulis , a new
acaulescent species oflridaceae-Ixioideae from the Knersvlakle,
Namaqualand, South Africa. Novon 3: 148-153.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 1993b. Proposal to amend con-
served Freesia by rejecting Anomatheca (Iridaceae). Taxon 42:
891,892.
GOLDBLATT, P. & OLIVER, E.G.H. 1993. A new species of Galaxia
(Iridaceae subfamily Iridoideae) from Namaqualand, South
Africa. Novon 3: 404—407.
GRIFFITHS, M. & OLIVER, E.G.H. 1993. Erica. In A. Huxley, The new
Royal Horticultural Society dictionary of gardening 2: 1 83-1 89.
HILTON-TAYLOR, C. 1993a. Review: Life strategies of succulents in
deserts: with special reference to the Namib Desert, by D.J. von
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
257
Willert, el al. African Journal of Ecology 31: 88, 89.
HILTON-TAYLOR,C. 1993b. Karoo succulents threatened with extinc-
tion. Our Living World , September 1993: 14.
HOFFMAN, M.T. 1993a. Major P.J. Pretorius and the decimation of the
Addo elephant herd in 1919-1920: important re-assessments.
Koedoe 36,2: 23M4.
HOFFMAN, M.T. 1993b. The potential value of historical ecology to
environmental monitoring. In C. Marais & D.M. Richardson,
Monitoring requirements for fynbos management: 69-86. FRD
Programme Report Series No. 1 1 .
HOFFMAN, M.T. 1993c. Visit of Henry-Noel le Houerou. Bulletin of
the South African Institute of Ecologists 12,3: 14.
HOFFMAN, M.T. 1994. The Arid Zone Ecology Forum. Forum
Botanicum 31,1: 1-3.
HOFFMAN, M.T., JAMES, C.D., KERLEY, G.I. Jnr & WHITFORD,
W.G. 1993. Rabbit herbivory and its effect on cladode, flower
and fruit production of Opuntia violacea var. macrocentra (Cac-
taceae) in the northern Chihuahuan Desert, New Mexico. The
Southwestern Naturalist 38: 309-3 1 5.
HUNTLEY, B.J. 1993a. Guest editorial: Plants for people. Veld & Flora
79: 66.
HUNTLEY, B.J. 1993b. Kirstenbosch development plan. Veld & Flora
79: 71.
HUNTLEY, B.J. 1993c. Of buzzwords and symposia. Veld & Flora 79:
82.
JAMES, C.D., HOFFMAN, M.T., LIGHTFOOT. D.C., FORBES, G.S.
& WHITFORD, W.G. 1993. Pollination ecology of Yucca elata:
an experimental study of amutualistic association. Oecologia 93:
512-517.
JOFFE, P. 1993. The gardener's guide to South African plants. Delos,
Cape Town. (Also in Afrikaans).
JOHNSON, S.D. & STEINER, K.E. 1994. Efficient pollination of the
mass-flowering Cape orchid Disaobtusa Lindl. (Orchidaceae) by
Bibio tumeri Edwards (Diptera: Bibionidae). African Entomo-
logy 2: 64—66.
JOHNSON, S.D., STEINER, K.E. & KURZWEIL, H. 1994. Auto-pol-
lination in Disa species (Orchidaceae) of the Cape Mountain
cloud-zone. Lindleyana 9: 3-6.
KOEKEMOER, M. 1 993. Synopsis of the genus D isparago ( Asteraceae ).
Bothalia 23: 197-206.
KURZWEIL, H. 1993a. Seed morphology in southern African Or-
chidoideae (Orchidaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 185:
229-247.
KURZWEIL, H. 1993b. Bemerkungen zu den Erdorchideen des Mt
Mulanje, Malawi. Die Orchidee 44: 88-93.
KURZWEIL, H. 1993c. Development studies in orchid flowers IV.
Cypripedioid species. Nordic Journal of Botany 13: 423-430.
KURZWEIL, H. & BURGER, M. 1993. A major re-discovery of Disa
minor. Veld & Flora 79: 72, 73.
LADD, P.G. & DONALDSON, J.S. 1993. Pollen presenters in the South
African flora. South African Journal of Botany 59: 465-477.
LINDER, H P., VLOK, J.h', MCDONALD, D.J., OLIVER, E.G.H.,
BOUCHER, C„ VAN WYK, B-E. & SCHUTTE, A. 1993. The
high altitude flora and vegetation of the Cape Floristic Region,
South Africa. Opera Botanica 121: 247-261.
MANNING, J.C. 1993. Two aseasonal novelties of Iridaceae: an inves-
tigation into the scientific method. Indigenous Bulb Growers
Association of South Africa Bulletin 41 : 22-26.
MANNING, J.C. & BRITS, G.J. 1993. Seed coat development in
Leucospermum cordifolium (Salisb. ex Knight) Fourcade
(Proteaceae) and a clarification of the seed covering structures in
Proteaceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 112: 139-
MS.
MCDONALD, D.J. 1993a. The vegetation of the southern Langeberg,
Cape Province. 1. Plant communities of the Boosmansbos
Wilderness Area. Bothalia 23: 129-151.
MCDONALD, D.J. 1993b. The vegetation of the southern Langeberg,
Cape Province. 2. Plant communities of the Marloth Nature
Reserve. Bothalia 23: 153-174.
MCDONALD, D.J. 1993c. The vegetation of the southern Langeberg,
Cape Province. 3. The plant communities of the Bergfontein,
Rooiwaterspruit and Phesantefontein areas. Bothalia 23: 239-
263.
MCDONALD, D.J. & POWRIE, F.J. 1993. Pelargonium tricolor : a
colourful candidate for cultivation. Journal of the Australian
Geranium Society Inc. October: 8-12.
MCDONALD, D.J. & SNIJMAN, D. 1 994. Touwsberg '93: getting high
on a mountain. Veld & Flora 80: 6-9.
M1DGLEY, G.F. 1993a. Grime’s triangle: synthesis, senseless or
signpost? Bulletin of the South African Institute of Ecology 12,1:
15-18.
MIDGLEY, G.F. 1 993b. Leucospermum rodolentum populations on the
arid west coast. Protea Atlas Newsletter 21: 12.
MIDGLEY, G.F. & MOLL, E.J. 1993. Gas exchange in arid-adapted
shrubs: when is efficient water use a disadvantage? South African
Journal of Botany 59: 491M95.
MIDGLEY, G.F. & O’CALLAGHAN, M. 1993. Listed South African
contributors in A. Markham, N. Dudley & S. Stolton, Some like
it hot: climate change, biodiversity and survival of species. World
Wildlife Fund for Nature, Gland, Switzerland.
MILTON, S.J. & HOFFMAN, M.T. 1994. The application of state and
transition models to rangeland research and management in arid
succulent and semi-arid grassy karoo. South Africa. African
Journal of Range and Forage Science 11: 18-26.
MUSIL, C.F. 1993a. Effects of atmospheric ozone depletion on plants.
Veld & Flora 79: 44, 45.
MUSIL, C.F. 1993b. Effect of invasive Australian acacias on the
regeneration, growth and nutrient chemistry of South African
lowland fynbos. Journal of Applied Ecology 30: 361-372.
MUSIL, C.F. 1993c. The NBI ultraviolet radiation connection. Forum
Botanicum 30,4: 7.
MUSIL, C.F. & WAND, S.J.E. 1993. Responses of sclerophyllous
Ericaceae to enhanced levels of ultraviolet-B radiation. Environ-
mental and Experimental Botany 33: 233—242.
MUSIL, C.F. & WAND, S.J.E. 1994. Differential stimulation of an arid
environment winter ephemeral Dimorphotheca pluvialis (L.)
Moench by ultraviolet-B radiation under nutrient limitation.
Plant, Cell and Environment 17: 245-255.
NELSON, E.C. & ROURKE, J.P. 1993. James Niven (1776-1827), a
Scottish botanical collector at the Cape of Good Hope. His hortus
siccus at the National Botanic Gardens, Glasnevin, Dublin
(DBN), and the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (K). Kew Bulletin
48: 663-682.
NOTTEN, A.L. 1993. Review: Keith Kirsten’s complete garden manual
for South Africa, by Keith Kirsten, 1992. Veld & Flora 79: 62.
O’CALLAGHAN. M„ POWRIE, L.W., RUTHERFORD, M.C. &
DAVIS, G.W. 1994. Vegetation response to climate change in
southern Africa: GIS’s place in the predictive modelling toolbox.
In Decision making with GIS — the fourth dimension. Proceed-
ings of the eighth annual symposium on Geographic Information
Systems in forestry, environmental and natural resource manage-
ment, February 21-24, 1994, Vancouver, Canada: 495-499.
OLIVER, E.G.H. 1993a. Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae). X.
Nomenclatural changes for the Flore des Mascareignes region.
Kew Bulletin 48: 767-769.
OLIVER, E.G.H. 1993b. Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae). XI. The
generic relationship between Erica and Blaeria. Kew Bulletin 48:
771-780.
OLIVER, E.G.H. 1993c. Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae). XII. The
placing of the genus Blaeria into synonymy under Erica;
nomenclatural and taxonomic changes for the southern African
region. Bothalia 23: 1-7.
OLIVER. E.G.H. 1 993d. A new species of Oxalis from the western Cape
Province. Bothalia 23: 72-74.
OLIVER. E.G.H. 1993e. Blaeria L. (lectotypification). In C.E. Jarvis,
F.R. Barrie, D.M. Allan & J.L. Reveal, A list of Linnaean generic
names and their types. Regnum Vegetabile 127: 25.
OLIVER, E.G.H. & FELLINGHAM, A.C. 1993. Cliffortia L. (lec-
totypification). In C.E. Jarvis, F.R. Barrie, D.M. Allan & J.L.
Reveal, A list of Linnaean generic names and their types. Regnum
Vegetabile 127: 35.
OLIVER. E.G.H. & OLIVER, l.M. 1993. Studies in the Ericoideae
(Ericaceae). XIII. Three new species of Erica from the south-
western Cape Province. Bothalia 23: 9-14.
OLIVER, E.G.H. & VAN WYK, C.M. 1993. Ericaceae. In T.H. Arnold
& B.C. de Wet, Plants of southern Africa: names and distribution.
Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 62: 534—
552.
OLIVER, I.B. 1993. The KarooNational Botanical Garden. Veld & Flora
79: 46-48.
PEROLD, S.M. 1993a. The hepatics, Symphyogyna podophylta and
Pallavicinia lyellii (Pallaviciniaceae) in southern Africa.
Bothalia 23: 15-23.
PEROLD, S.M. 1993b. Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from
southern Africa. 1. The genus Dumortiera and D. hirsuta; the
genus Lunularia and L. cruciata. Bothalia 23: 49-57.
PEROLD, S.M. 1993c. The hepatic, Calycularia crispula (Metzgeriales)
reported from Malawi and Zambia (Allisoniaceae). Bothalia 23:
79-83.
PEROLD, S.M. 1993d. Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from
258
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
southern Africa. 2. The genus Athalamia and A. spathysii: the
genus Oxymitra and O. cristata. Bothalia 23: 207-214.
PEROLD, S.M. 1993e. Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from
southern Africa. 3. The genus Targionia and T. hypophylla with
notes- on T. lorbeeriana and Cyathodium foetidissimum (Tar-
gioniaceae). Bothalia 23: 215-222.
PEROLD, S.M. 1993f. The hepatic, Jensenia spinosa (= Pallavicinia
stephanii : Pallaviciniaceae), in southern Africa. Bothalia 23:
223-229.
PEROLD, S.M. 1993g. Ricciacea e/Riccia L. In Taxonomic results of the
Bryotrop expedition to Zaire and Rwanda. Tropica l Bryology 8:
55-68.
PEROLD, S.M. 1993h. Discover the fascinating study of bryophytes.
Archimedes 35: 50-56.
PEROLD, S.M. 1994. Die evolusie van gametangiofore in Suider-
Afrikaanse Marchiantiales (Hepaticae): 'n hipotese/The evolu-
tion of gametangiophores in southern African Marchiantiales
(Hepaticae): a hypothesis. (Summary in English). Die Suid-
Afrikaanse Tydskrifvir Natuurwetenskap enTegnologie 13: 16-
20.
PEROLD, S.M. & VAN ROOY, J. 1993. Hepaticae. In T.H. Arnold &
B.C. de Wet, Plants of southern Africa: names and distribution.
Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 62: 5-16.
POWRIE, F. 1994. Staavias in cultivation. Veld & Flora 80: 24-26.
REBELO, A.G. 1993. Using the Proteaceae to design a nature reserve
network and determine conservation priorities for the Cape
Floristic Region. In P.L. Forey, C.J. Humphries & R. Vane-
Wright, Systematics and conservation evaluation: 375-396.
Clarendon Press, Oxford.
REBELO, A.G. & TANSLEY, S.A. 1993. Using rare plant species to
identify priority conservation areas in the Cape Floristic Region:
the need to standardise for total species richness. South African
Journal of Botany 89: 156-161.
REID, C. 1993a. Xyridaceae, Liliaceae, Alliaceae, Cyperaceae, Flagel-
lariaceae, Restionaceae, Eriocaulaceae, Commelinaceae, Jun-
caceae, Colchicaceae, Asphodelaceae (Part A), Hyacinthaceae,
Eriospermaceae, Dracaenaceae, Asparagaceae, Luzuriagaceae,
Iridaceae, Musaceae, Strelitziaceae, Zingiberaceae, Cannaceae,
Burmanniaceae, Orchidaceae. In T.H. Arnold & B.C. de Wet,
Plants of southern Africa: names and distribution. Memoirs of the
Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 62.
REID, C. 1993b. Cyrtanthus carneus. The Flowering Plants of Africa 52:
t. 2068.
REID, C. 1993c. Gladiolus dolomiticus. The Flowering Plants of Africa
52: t. 2070.
REID, C. 1993d. Anochilus hallii. The Flowering Plants of Africa 52: t.
2071.
REID, C. 1994. Cyrtanthus herrei. The Kew Magazine 1 1 : 9-13.
REID, C. & ARCHER, R.H. 1993. Haemadoraceae, Amaryllidaceae,
Hypoxidaceae, Tecophilaeaceae, Velloziaceae, Dioscoreaceae.
In T.H. Arnold & B.C. de Wet, Plants of southern Africa: names
and distribution. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa
No. 62.
REID, C. & GLEN, H.F. 1993. Asphodelaceae (Part B). In T.H. Arnold
& B.C. de Wet, Plants of southern Africa: names and distribution.
Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 62.
RETIEF, E. 1993a. Cyphostemma uter. The Flowering Plants of Africa
52: t. 2074.
RETIEF, E. 1993b. A new species of Rhoicissus from the Transvaal.
Bothalia 23: 231-237.
ROURKE, J.P. 1993. Thesmophora, a new genus of Stilbaceae from
South Africa. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 50: 89-95.
ROUX, J.P. 1993a. A new cytotype for Acrostichum aureum. Bothalia
23:75.
ROUX, J.P. 1993b. The genus Asplenium L. ( Aspleniaceae:
Pteridophyta) in the Tristan-Gough Island group. Kew Bulletin
48: 79-97.
ROUX, J.P. 1993c. Systematic studies in the genus Mohria
(Anemiaceae: Pteridophyta). IV. Comparative gametophyte mor-
phology in Mohria and Anemia. Bothalia23: 191-196.
ROUX, J.P. 1993d. Elaplioglossum Schott ex J. Smith (Lomariop-
sidaceae: Pteridophyta) in the Tristan da Cunha, Gough and
Marion Island groups. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society
1 12: 203-222.
RUTHERFORD, M.C. & POWRIE, L.W. 1993. Allelochemic control
of biomass allocation in interacting shrub species. Journal of
Chemical Ecology 19: 893-906.
RUTHERFORD, M.C. & WESTFALL, R.H. 1994. Biomes of southern
Africa: an objective categorization, 2nd edn. Memoirs of the
Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 63.
SAUNDERS, R. 1993. Kirstenbosch, the garden. Veld & Flora 79:
67-70.
SAUNDERS, R. 1994. Review: A field guide to the flora of the Natal
Drakensberg, by D. Killick, 1990. Veld & Flora 80: 30, 31.
SCOTT, G. 1993. Medicinal and aromatic plants: healthcare, economics
and conservation in South Africa. Veld & Flora 79: 84-87.
SMITH, G.F. 1993. Notes on the taxonomic and conservation status of
Aloe microcantha (Asphodelaceae: Alooideae). Haseltonia 1:
55-60.
SMITH, G.F., COLE, D.T. & VAN WYK, B-E. 1993. Bechuanaland: a
misunderstood geographical name; and the type locality of
Haworthia tenuifolia (Asphodelaceae: Alooideae). Taxon 42:
369-371.
SMITH, G.F., FULS, E.R., VAN WYK, J.J.P., HEYDENRYCH, G.V.
& VAN WYK, S. (1993) 1994. Application of revegetation
principles: the use of Euphorbia tirucalli L. (Euphorbiaceae) for
asbestos trailing rehabilitation. Bradleya 1 1 : 86-90.
SMITH, G.F. & GLEN, H.F. 1993. Of aloes, artists and coins: Aloe
aculeata on the ‘old’ 10c piece. Aloe 30: 17-19.
SMITH, G.F. & HAWKSWORTH, D.L. 1994. Stability of scientific
plant names — an attainable goal? South African Journal of
Science 90: 59, 60.
SMITH, G.F., HOBSON, S.R., MEYER, N.L., CHESSELET, P„ AR-
CHER, R.H., BURGOYNE, P.M., GLEN, H.F., HERMAN,
P.P.J., RETIEF, E„ SMITHIES, S.J. & WELMAN, W.G. 1993.
Southern African succulent plants — an updated synopsis. Aloe
30:31-74.
SMITH, G.F., ROURKE, J.P. & OLIVER, E.G.H. 1993. Stability in
botanical nomenclature. South African Journal of Science 89:
313.
SMITH, G.F. & VAN WYK, A.E. 1993a. Notes on the pollen morphol-
ogy and taxonomy of Aloe bowiea (Asphodelaceae: Alooideae).
Madoqua 18: 93-99.
SMITH, G.F. & VAN WYK, A.E. 1993b. The generic status of Chor-
tolirion (Aloaceae): evidence from leaf anatomy. Kew Bulletin
48:105-113.
SMOOK, L. & ELLIS, R.P. 1993. Panicum simulans (Paniceae,
Poaceae), a new species from southern Africa and its leaf
anatomy. Bothalia 23: 59-64.
SNIJMAN, D.A. (1992) 1993. Review of the systematics of the
Strumariinae (Amaryllidaceae). Herbertia 48: 52-57.
SNIJMAN, D.A. & VAN WYK, A.E. 1993. A new species of Haeman-
thus (Amaryllidaceae) from the eastern Transvaal Escarpment,
South Africa. South African Journal of Botany 59: 247-250.
STEINER, K.E., WHITEHEAD, V.B. & JOHNSON, S.D. 1994. Floral
and pollinator divergence in two sexually deceptive South
African orchids. American Journal of Botany 81:1 85-194.
STEYN, E.M.A. 1993a. Spermatozoids of Encephalartos villosus. En-
cephalartos 36:1 8-20.
STEYN. E.M.A. 1993b. Cryptically female flowers in ‘Fuerte’: fact or
falacy? S.A. Avocado Growers' Association Yearbook 16: 9-17.
STEYN, E.M.A., ROBBERTSE, P.J. & SMITH, D. 1993a. An anatomi-
cal study of ovary-to-cuke development in consistently low-
producing trees of the ‘Fuerte’ avocado ( Persea americanci Mill.)
with special reference to seed abortion. Sexual Plant Reproduc-
tion 6: 87-97.
STEYN, E.M.A., ROBBERTSE, P.J. & SMITH, D. 1993b. Cuke
development in consistently low-producing trees of ‘Fuerte’
avocado with special reference to seed abortion. S.A. Avocado
Growers ' Association Yearbook 16: 5-8.
STEYN. E.M.A. & STRYDOM, D.J.F. 1993. The nucellus: its position
and function in the ovule of Encephalartos. Encephalartos 35:
14-18.
STRYDOM, D.J.F. 1993a. Uit die veld se spens. Conserva 8,5: 14, 15.
STRYDOM, D.J.F. 1993b. Uit die veld se spens, Harpephyllum caffrum.
Conserva 8,6: 16, 17.
STRYDOM, D.J.F. 1994. Uit die veld se spens, Lannea discolor. Con-
serva 9 A: 16, 17.
SWARTZ, P. 1993. Review: Succulents of the Transvaal, D. Hardy,
1992. Veld & Flora 79: 63.
V AN JA ARS VELD, E. 1 993a. The Baviaanskloof, Kouga Dam and Aloe
pictifolia. National Cactus and Succulent Journal (Great Britain)
11,1.
VAN JAARSVELD, E. 1993b. Aloe gariepensis Pillans. Cactus &
Succulent Journal (U.S.) 65: 88, 89.
VAN JAARSVELD, E. 1993c. The remarkable Narna plakkie: another
of Ernst’s fascinating desert plants, Tylecodon singularis. Veld &
Flora 79: 40, 41.
VAN JAARSVELD, E. 1993d. The Richtersveld botanical expedition.
Veld & Flora 79: 100-106.
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
259
VAN JAARSVELD, E. 1993e. Seven great succulent gardens of the
world. Aloe 30: 4-10.
VAN JAARSVELD, E. 1993f. The miracle plant. Aloe vera. Farmer's
Weekly 83051 Dec. 17:48,49.
VAN JAARSVELD, E. 1993g. Aloes. Garden & Home, August: 104-
107.
VAN JAARSVELD, E. 1994a. Die papierkannetjie van Aggenys, Cono-
phytum burgeri. Veld & Flora 80: 20, 2 1 .
VAN JAARSVELD, E. 1994b. Review: The living deserts of southern
Africa, by Barry Lovegrove. Veld & Flora 80: 29.
VAN JAARSVELD, E. & NORDENSTAM, B. 1993. Pteronia hetero-
carpa. Aloe 30: II, 12.
VAN ROOY, J. 1993. Musci. In T.H. Arnold & B.C. de Wet, Plants of
southern Africa: names and distribution. Memoirs of the Botani-
cal Survey of South Africa No. 62.: 1 7 — 46.
WELMAN, W.G. 1993a. Convolvulaceae, Hydrophyllaceae, Stilbaceae,
Lamiaceae, Solanaceae, Retziaceae, Scrophulariaceae. Sela-
ginaceae, Martyniaceae, Orobanchaceae, Gesneriaceae, Acan-
thaceae, Myoporaceae, Plantaginaceae, Valerianaceae, Dip-
sacaceae, Campanulaceae, Sphenocleaceae, Lobeliaceae, Goode-
niaceae, Helichrysum, Senecio (Asteraceae). In T.H. Arnold &
B.C. de Wet, Plants of southern Africa: names and distribution.
Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 62.
WELMAN, W.G. 1993b. Hulde aan ’n amateur: N.J. Devenish — boeren
plantversamelaar. PlantLife 9: 14, 15.
WHITEHEAD, V.B. & STEINER, K.E. 1994. A new Rediviva bee
(Hymenoptera, Melittidae) from the north-western Cape Pro-
vince, South Africa. Annals of the South African Museum 104:
1-11.
WINTER, J.H.S. 1993. Review: Bushveld trees: lifeblood of the
Transvaal lowveld, by M. Funston (photographer), P. Borchert &
B. van Wyk, 1993. Veld & Flora 79: 123.
WINTER, J.H.S. 1994a. Going for gold: Kirstenbosch Botanical Garden
as a new plant introduction centre. Veld & Flora 80: 22, 23.
WINTER, J.H.S. 1994b. Review: The cycad collection, Durban Botanic
Gardens, by Roy Osborne, 1993. Veld & Flora 80: 30.
WINTER, J.H.S. & BOTHA, D.J. 1 994. The release of endangered plants
into the horticultural trade: conservation or exploitation.
Biodiversity and Conservation 3: 142-147.
WISURA, W. & GLEN, H.F. 1993. The South African species of
Carpobrotus. Contributions from the Bolus Herbarium 15: 76-
107.
ZAVADA, M.S. & SCOTT, G. 1993. Pollen morphology of Cyanella
species (Tecophilaeaceae). Grana 32: 189-192.
. ■ . •
Bothalia 24,2: 261-262(1994)
Book Reviews
AN AFRICAN SAVANNA. SYNTHESIS OF THE NYLSVLEY
STUDY by R.J. Scholes & B.H. Walker. 1993. Cambridge University
Press, The Edinburgh Bldg, Cambridge CB2 2RU. Pp. xii + 306. ISBN
0 521 41971 9. Price: £45.00, $69.95.
The Savanna Ecosystem Programme of the CSIR, which lasted for
16 years (1974-1990), constituted the largest ecological research venture
ever initiated in southern Africa, and aimed to understand and predict an
ecosystem response to natural and anthropogenic influence. This book,
in the words of the authors, aims to be a synthesis rather than a summary
of this effort, and I have accordingly reviewed it in this light.
The book consists of 1 8 chapters in five sections. The first section of
five chapters provides the background on the people, climate, geology,
landforms, soils and biota of Nylsvley, prefaced with an overview of the
context of Nylsvley in relation to other African savannas. The four
determinants of savanna structure and functioning, namely water,
nutrients, fire and herbivory, are grouped into a second section of four
chapters, followed by a chapter each on primary production and decom-
position to form a third section describing the carbon cycle. The fourth
section considers community and landscape pattern and change: the four
chapters cover the distinction between nutrient-rich and nutrient-poor
savannas; community structure, composition and dynamics; interactions
between the woody and herbaceous components; and plant-herbivore
interactions. The final section of three chapters distils the findings of the
Nylsvley programme into concepts of savanna ecology and recommen-
dations for the management of savannas, and closes with some reflections
on such large programmes. For readers not familiar with the Nylsvley
programme, research was restricted to the Burkea africana-Eragrostis
pollens vegetation type on nutrient-poor sandy soils.
The first chapter settles the reader in well, by introducing many of
the themes pursued in the book, outlining the importance of savannas in
Africa, and identifying the two broad classes of fine-leafed and broad-
leafed savannas with their ecological correlates of nutrient-rich low-rain-
fall and nutrient-poor high-rainfall conditions respectively. The next four
chapters of the introductory section provide background information for
Nylsvley. As fascinating as their content is, some of the detailed descrip-
tions of the geology, landforms, soils and biota of the entire reserve
seemed superfluous because the focus of the book is on the Burkea
savanna.
I thought the meat of this book was the treatment of water, nutrients,
primary production and consumption. This country has seen little re-
search effort which has attempted to obtain a mechanistic understanding
of the constraints on primary production — the Nylsvley work is one of
the better examples. The chapter on water provides a quantitative descrip-
tion of the water balance of this system, and of plant water relations
including the water-use efficiency of key species. The treatment of the
nitrogen and phosphorus cycles in the chapter on nutrients was one of the
better features of the book. Not only the determination of the pool sizes
of these elements, but the insights offered into the processes of nutrient
cycling, particularly the identification of potential rate-limiting proces-
ses, is an important contribution to savanna ecology. In this system,
nitrogen would appear to be a more important element than phosphorus
for plant growth, and its availability is determined by the rate of release
of inorganic nitrogen through mineralisation, which in turn is controlled
by water availability. This theme is picked up later in the chapter on
decomposition, which is suggested to be the ultimate control on plant
production because it controls the rate at which nitrogen becomes avail-
able to the plant.
The chapter on decomposition describes the rate of breakdown of
plant litter, the predominant role of decomposer organisms for energy
cycling, and the proportion of decomposition achieved by the different
decomposer organisms. Above- and below-ground primary production of
the tree and grass components (chapter on primary production), the
partitioning of plant production between mammalian and invertebrate
consumers and their secondary production (chapter on herbivory), is
quantitatively described. The figures for the relative consumption of dry
matter by mammalian or invertebrate consumers are a simple yet essential
advance in our understanding of energy flow within savannas. However,
the available plant material of a community is not uniformly harvested
by consumers, and the chapter on plant-herbivore interactions examines
some of the structural and chemical reasons for the differential consump-
tion of plant species. This chapter leans heavily on the work of Owen-
Smith and colleagues on browsers and browse, but considers grazing
patterns marginally. Although it is a competent precis of the browse work,
I detected little synthesis, and thought the section on grazing lacked
insight.
The chapter on fire infers the fire regime at Nylsvley, and describes
the effect of a single fire on the microclimate, nutrients, woody plant
mortality, herbaceous plants, insects and small mammals. Although the
chapter offers the convenience of coalescing otherwise diffuse informa-
tion, it has little novel statement to make, due in part, I imagine, to the
fact that no research programme on fire was conducted at Nylsvley. The
miscellaneous observations that were made did not warrant a chapter.
The treatment of community structure, composition and dynamics is
a summary rather than a synthesis. The published work on these important
topics is given routine mention. This chapter in particular raised the
question of why only two people should have written up the findings of
a considerable number of talented scientists. I felt that this and many other
chapters would have been enhanced considerably if the people that had
been actively engaged in research on these topics had contributed.
Two chapters in particular develop general ideas on the structure and
functioning of African savannas based on the work done at Nylsvley. The
first describes the former human settlements which are now nutrient-en-
riched and differ in vegetation composition, structure and productivity
and fauna, compared with the surrounding Burkea savanna, as a conse-
quence of anthropoeic activities. These field meso-cosm differences are
then used as a basis for explaining the differences in the structure and
functioning of nutrient-rich and nutrient-poor savannas throughout
southern Africa, despite the authors’ earlier statements that such under-
standing can only be gained from a consideration of the position of a
given savanna on the axes of available moisture and available nutrients.
The second concerns the nature of the tree-grass relationship in savannas.
A body of evidence is assembled which discounts the currently popular
notion that the co-dominance of trees and grass in savanna represents a
competitive equilibrium determined by the relative accessibility of these
components to deep and surface soil moisture. An alternative proposal of
disequilibrium between these two components, driven by the influence
of the disturbance (especially fire) regime on recruitment and mortality,
is offered with supporting evidence. As much as these two chapters
contain stimulating material, they suffer a fundamental blemish which is
apparent throughout the book. A wealth of pertinent research on savannas
in Africa and elsewhere has been all but disregarded (the list of references
contains very few which do not originate from Nylsvley), much of which
I believe would enhance, challenge or qualify the conclusions reached in
this book.
The final section of three chapters is a refreshing departure from the
manner in which many books are closed. Concluding concepts and ideas
of the subject matter of the chapters described above are distilled. Some
of the implications of the fundamental research conducted at Nylsvley
for the management of savannas in general are developed, with an
emphasis on the importance of temporal and spatial variability, and
comment on stocking rate, herbivore species mix, fire, the proportion of
trees and grass, and rehabilitation. The final chapter is a reflection of the
strengths and weaknesses of the modus operandi of the expensive Savan-
na Biome programme, with suggestions for future research. The reference
list includes a useful bibliography of all work, including unpublished
reports, from Nylsvley.
The omissions of this book need mention. Limited attention was paid
to the considerable work on invertebrates and other animal components —
a synthesis of consumer community structure and trophic relationships
might have been a novel contribution, as the Nylsvley site has probably
enjoyed greater study of these components than any other site in Africa.
This book would have been an ideal forum to present such insights.
This book has a number of other shortcomings, the most serious of
which is repeated generalization, unsupported by citation, which
obscures facts, concepts and ideas. Speculation in earlier chapters is
262
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
presented as statement in later chapters. This style is unfortunate in a
book which is targeted toward undergraduate students. Many current
ecological concepts are phrased as established principles (e.g. carbon-
nutrient balance, models of succession). The less informed are likely to
experience difficulty in distinguishing fact from fancy.
I was pleased to see the Nylsvley ’saga' finally between two hard
covers, but was disappointed because the book is not what it might have
been. The chapters were of variable quality; it would seem to me that the
authors were not appropriate for all the subject matter dealt with, and
important material was omitted. Nevertheless, some very original and
stimulating material is presented, and 1 am sure this book will be a key
reference for a number of years to come. If the authors stimulate savanna
researchers and managers to adopt a process-oriented approach to solving
their particular problems, they will have made a contribution of ines-
timable value.
T.G. O’CONNOR*
* Dohne Agricultural Development Institute, Private Bag XI 5, Stutter-
heim 4930, South Africa.
FLORA OF AUSTRALIA Volume 50: Oceanic Islands 2, edited by A.S.
George, A. E. Orchard, H.J. Hewson & H.S. Thompson. 1993 .Australian
Government Publishing Service, GPO Box 84, Canberra ACT 2601.
ISBN 9780644 144469. Pp 606. 24 colour plates + 73 line drawings.
Price: soft cover. Cat. No. 92 2890 7, SA44.95; hard cover. Cat. No. 91
0943 1, SA59.95.
This volume is not the run of the mill volume of a flora, that deals
with members of a single or a few related families, but rather an account
of an assemblage of families that occur on some of the islands off the
Australian coast. The work comprises an introduction to the rationale
behind the volume and the scope and presentation of the volume; a key
to the major plant groups followed by an index of the keys to families;
description and analysis of the vegetation of six islands (or groups of
islands) grouped into tropical territories and subantarctic islands; ac-
counts of 1 1 3 families of vascular plants, an appendix with new taxa and
combinations; a supplementary glossary; a list of abbreviations and
contractions; a list of publication dates of previous volumes; an index;
and, inside the covers, a plan of the whole series and an index to the
volumes in which different families are or are to be covered. The volume
has a bright cover, with a painting of a variety of screwpine that is
endemic to one of the islands on the front.
The floristic and ecological analysis, botanical history and list of taxa
for each island is very informative and the usefulness of the latter is
obvious. Keys to families are presented for each island, rather than having
a single comprehensive key for all familiescoveredin the volume. Hence,
the keys are short and sometimes use vegetative features with obvious
advantages, as long as attempts are not made to use the keys in areas for
which they were not intended. The decision to present the accounts of
the families in an integrated whole rather than separately for each island
is a good one, which prevents much repetition or considerable cross
referencing. The accounts of families and genera are in a standard format.
The species descriptions are fuller and more diverse than usual. Accounts
of species include citation of types, etymology, references to illustrations
in other works, a description, common names, local distribution, ecologi-
cal notes, global distribution, vouchers (with herbaria cited) and a dis-
cussion with notes on various uses, dispersal, taxonomy, nomenclature,
aspects that require further work, and the introduction and spread of
naturalised species.
The typeface is small, but very readable due to the layout with open
lines between paragraphs, the different fonts and the good quality paper;
space is thus very economically used and costs are contained. The colour
photographs (Figures 1-24, 50-81 ) greatly enhance the flora and show
some of the habitats as well as some of the more interesting and distinc-
tive taxa. The maps (Figures 25-31) and particularly the line drawings
(Figures 32^19, 82-97) are of extremely good quality; they are well laid
out, accurate, attractive and well reproduced as well as being well placed
in the text. Figures 59, 80 and 81, which show associations of taxa, are
particularly pleasing. We were disappointed to note no resupination in
the tube of Dicliptera maclearii (Figure 86H), however. We would also
have found it informative if the family name had been included in the
captions of the photographs. If you want to know the name of a family
you do not recognise, you have to use the index to find the account of the
species and thence the name of the family.
The Introduction provides no information on how the floras of these
islands relate to each other, how they relate to the floras of Norfolk and
Lord Howe Islands (Volume 49) and how the floras of all these islands
relate to the rest of the Australian flora. Perhaps this is to be discussed in
Volume 49, Oceanic Islands I.
The format of this Bora is most satisfying, providing everything that
the serious botanist requires, while offering information to stimulate
more lighthearted and amateur botanists. Dr R.K. Brummitt has indicated
that the format for a new world flora, 'The Species Plantarum’, is to look
much like this one, and we can only endorse this decision. For southern
African botanists, this volume could provide a stimulus and challenge as
we consider the format of our own flora which has recently been
re-instated.
K. BALKWILL* and M-J. BALKWILL*
* C.E. Moss Herbarium, Botany Department, University of the Wit-
watersrand. Private Bag 3, WITS 2050.
Bothalia 24,2: 263-271 (1994)
Guide for authors to Bothalia
This guide is updated when necessary and includes an
index. Important points and latest additions appear in
bold type.
Bothalia is named in honour of General Louis Botha,
first Premier and Minister of Agriculture of the Union of
South Africa. This house journal of the National Botanical
Institute, Pretoria, is devoted to the furtherance of botani-
cal science. The main fields covered are taxonomy, ecol-
ogy, anatomy and cytology. Two parts of the journal and
an index to contents, authors and subjects are published
annually.
1 Editorial policy
Bothalia welcomes original papers dealing with flora
and vegetation of southern Africa and related subjects.
Full-length papers and short notes, as well as book
reviews, are accepted. Manuscripts may be written in
either English or Afrikaans.
Articles are assessed by referees, both local and over-
seas. Authors are welcome to suggest possible referees to
judge their work. Authors are responsible for the factual
correctness of their contributions. Bothalia maintains an
editorial board (see title page) to ensure that international
standards are upheld.
Hard copy of articles should preferably be accom-
panied by PC diskettes or stiffies.
2 Requirements for diskettes/stiffies
2. 1 data must be IBM compatible and written in MSWord
5.5 or in ASCII.
2.2 a printout of the diskette should be supplied to indicate
(in pencil) the necessary page numbers, underlining,
paragraphs etc.
2.3 tables need not be placed on the diskette — a clearly
laid out hard copy is adequate.
2.4 the diskette must have double line spacing.
2.5 do not justify lines.
2.6 do not break words, except hyphenated words.
2.7 all lines, headings, keys, etc., should start flush at the
margin, therefore no indentations of any kind.
2.8 no italics, bold or underlined words. Only MSS sub-
mitted in MSWord 5.5 should use formatting for bold
and italics.
2.9 paragraphs and headings are delineated by an extra line
spacing (carriage return) and no indentation.
2.10 a hyphen is designated as one dash, with no space
between the letter and the dash, e.g. ovate-lanceolate. See
also 17.6.
2.11 an N-dash is typed as three hyphens with no space
between the letter and the hyphen, e.g. 2 — 5 mm
(typeset, it looks like this, 2-5 mm).
2.12 an M-dash is typed as two hyphens with no space
between the letter and the hyphen, e.g. computers - -what
a blessing! (typeset, it looks like this, computers — what).
2.13 do not use a double space between words, after
commas, full stops, colons, semicolons or exclamation
marks.
2.14 use lower case x as times sign, with one space on
either side of the x, e.g. 2x3 mm.
2.15 use single (not double) opening and closing quotes,
e.g. the so-called 'stiffy’ refers to a rigid diskette.
2. 16 keys — put only three leader dots before number and
name of taxon (with one space before and one space after
the first and last dot), regardless of how far or near the
word is from the right margin, e.g. ... 1. R. ovata.
3 Requirements for a manuscript
3. 1 Manuscripts should be typewritten on one side of good
quality A4-size paper, double-spaced throughout (includ-
ing abstract, tables, captions to figures, literature refer-
ences, etc.) and have a margin of at least 30 mm all round.
The original and three photocopies (preferably photo-
copied on both sides of the paper to reduce weight for
postage) of all items, including text, illustrations, tables
and lists should be submitted, and the author should retain
a complete set of copies.
3.2 Papers should conform to the general style and layout
of recent issues of Bothalia (from volume 17 onwards).
3.3 Material should be presented in the following se-
quence: Title page with title, name(s) of author(s), key-
words, abstracts (in English and Afrikaans) and informa-
tion that should be placed in a footnote on the title page,
such as address(es) of author(s) and mention of granting
agencies.
3.4 The sequence continues with Introduction and aims,
Material and methods, Results, Interpretation (Discus-
sion), Specimens examined (in revisions and mono-
graphs), Acknowledgements, References, Index of names
(recommended for revisions dealing with more than about
15 species). Tables, Captions for figures and figures. In the
case of short notes and book reviews, keywords and
abstract are superfluous.
3.5 All pages must be numbered (in pencil, not on dis-
kette) consecutively beginning with the title page to those
with references, tables and captions to figures.
264
Bothalia 24,2 ( 1994)
3.6 For notes on the use of hyphens and dashes see 2. 10 to
2.12.
3.7 Special character: use a word or code that is unique
and self-explanatory, enclosed between angle brackets,
e.g. <mu>m for pm. Please supply us with a list of the
codes.
4 Author(s)
When there are several authors the covering letter
should indicate clearly which of them is responsible for
correspondence and, if possible, telephonically available
while the article is being processed. The contact address
and telephone number should be mentioned if they differ
from those given on the letterhead.
5 Title
The title should be as concise and as informative as
possible. In articles dealing with taxonomy or closely re-
lated subjects the family of the taxon under discussion
(see also 13.2) should be mentioned in brackets but author
citations should be omitted from plant names.
6 Keywords
Up to 10 keywords (or index terms) should be provided
in English in alphabetical sequence. The following points
should be borne in mind when selecting keywords:
6. 1 keywords should be unambiguous, internationally ac-
ceptable words and not recently coined little-known
words.
6.2 they should be in a noun form and verbs should be
avoided.
6.3 they should not consist of an adjective alone; adjec-
tives should be combined with nouns.
6.4 they should not contain prepositions.
6.5 the singular form should be used for processes and
properties, e.g. evaporation.
6.6 the plural form should be used for physical objects, e.g.
augers.
6.7 location (province and/or country); taxa (species^
genus, family) and vegetation type (community, veld type,
biome) should be used as keywords.
6.8 keywords should be selected hierarchically where
possible, e.g. both family and species should be included.
6.9 they should include terms used in the title.
6.10 they should answer the following questions:
6. 1 0. 1 what is the active concept in the document (activity,
operation or process).
6.10.2, what is the passive concept or object of the active
process (item on which the activity, operation or process
takes place).
6. 1 0.3, what is the means of accomplishment or how is the
active concept achieved (technique, method, apparatus,
operation or process).
6. 10.4 what is the environment in which the active concept
takes place (medium, location).
6.10.5 what are the independent (controlled) and depend-
ent variables?
6.11 questions 6.10.1 to 6.10.3 should preferably also be
answered in the title.
7 Abstract
7.1 Abstracts of no more than 200 words should be
provided in English and Afrikaans. Abstracts are of great
importance and should convey the essence of the article.
7.2 They should refer to the geographical area concerned
and, in taxonomic articles, mention the number of taxa
treated. They should not contain information not appeal -
ing in the article.
7.3 In articles dealing with taxonomy or closely related
subjects all taxa from the rank of genus downwards should
be accompanied by their author citations.
7.4 Names of new taxa and new combinations should not
be underlined. If the article deals with too many taxa only
the important ones should be mentioned.
8 Table of contents
A table of contents should be given for all articles
longer than about six typed pages, unless they follow the
strict format of a taxonomic revision.
9 Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements should be kept to the minimum
compatible with the requirements of courtesy. Please give
all the initials of the person(s) you are thanking.
1 0 Literature references
In text
10.1 Literature references in the text should be cited as
follows: ‘Jones & Smith (1986) stated...’, or ‘...(Jones &
Smith 1986)’ or (Ellis 1988: 67) when giving a reference
simply as authority for a statement. For treatment of litera-
ture references in taxonomic papers see 14.
10.2 When more than two authors are involved in the
paper use the name of the first author followed by et al.
1 0.3 When referring to more than one literature reference,
they should be arranged chronologically and separated by
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
265
a semicolon, e.g. (Nixon 1940; Davis 1976; Anon. 1981,
1984).
10.4 Titles of books and names of journals should prefer-
ably not be mentioned in the text. If there is good reason
for doing so, they should be treated as described in 10.12
& 10.13.
10.5 Personal communications are given only in the text,
not in the list of references. Please add the person’s full
initials to identify the person more positively, e.g. C.
Boucher pers. comm.
In References at end of article
10.6 References of the same author are arranged in
chronological sequence.
10.7 Where two or more references by the same author are
listed in succession, the author’s name is repeated with
every reference.
10.8 All publications referred to in the text, including
those mentioned in full in the treatment of correct
names in taxonomic papers, but no others, and no per-
sonal communications, are listed at the end of the
manuscript under the heading References.
10.9 The references are arranged alphabetically according
to authors and chronologically under each author, with a,
b, c, etc. added to the year, if the author has published more
than one work in a year.
10. 10 If an author has published both on his own and as a
senior author with others, the solo publications are listed
first and after that, in strict alphabetical sequence, those
published with one or more other authors.
10. 1 1 Author names are typed in capitals.
10.12 Titles of journals and of books are written out in full
and are underlined as follows: Transactions of the Linnean
Society of London 5: 171-217, or Biology and ecology of
weeds'. 24.
10.13 Titles of books should be given as in Taxonomic
literature , edn 2 by Stafleu & Cowan and names of jour-
nals as in the latest edition of World list of scientific
periodicals.
1 0. 14 If the same author is mentioned more than once, the
name is written out in full and not replaced by a line.
10.15 Examples of references:
Collective book or Flora
BROWN, N.E. 1909. Asclepiadaceae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora
capensis 6,2: 518-1036. Reeve, London.
CUNNINGHAM, A.B. 1989. Indigenous plant use: balancing human
needs and resources. In B.I. Huntley. Biotic diversity in southern Africa —
concepts and conser\’atiorv. 93-106. Oxford University Press, Cape
Town.
Book
DU TOIT, A.L. 1966. Geology of South Africa, 3rd edn, S.M. Haughton
(ed.). Oliver & Boyd, London.
HUTCHINSON, J. 1946. A botanist in southern Africa. Gawthom,
London.
Journal
DAVIS, G. 1988. Description of a proteoid-restioid stand in Mesic
Mountain Fynbos of the southwestern Cape and some aspects of its
ecology. Bothalia 18: 279-287.
SMOOK, L. & GIBBS RUSSELL. G.E. 1985. Poaceae. Memoirs of the
Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 5 1 : 45-70.
STEBBINS, G.L. Jr 1952. Aridity as a stimulus to plant evolution.
American Naturalist 86: 35-44.
In press, in preparation
TAYLOR, H.C. in press. A reconnaissance of the vegetation of Rooiberg
State Forest. Technical Bulletin, Department of Forestry.
VOGEL, J.C. 1982. The age of the the Kuiseb river silt terrace at Homeb.
Palaeoecology of Africa 15. In press.
WEISSER, P.J., GARLAND, J.F. & DREWS, B.K. in prep. Dune ad-
vancement 1937-1977 and preliminary vegetation succession chronol-
ogy at Mlalazi Nature Reserve, Natal, South Africa. Bothalia.
Thesis
KRUGER, F.J. 1974. The physiography and plant communities of the
Jakkalsrivier Catchment. M.Sc. (Forestry) thesis. University of Stellen-
bosch.
MUNDAY, J. 1980. The genus Monechma Hochst. ( Acanthaceae tribe
Justiciae) in southern Africa. M.Sc. thesis, University of the Wit-
watersrand, Johannesburg.
Miscellaneous paper, report, unpublished article, tech-
nical note, congress proceedings
ANON, no date. Eetbare plante van die Wolkberg. Botanical Research
Unit, Grahamstown. Unpublished.
BAWDEN, M.G. & CARROL, D.M. 1968. The land resources of
Lesotho. Land Resources Study No. 3, Land Resources Division, Direc-
torate of Overseas Surveys, Tolworth.
BOUCHER, C. 1981. Contributions of the Botanical Research Institute.
In A.E.F. Heydom, Proceedings of workshop research in Cape estuaries :
105-107. National Research Institute for Oceanology, CSIR, Stellen-
bosch.
NATIONAL BUILDING RESEARCH INSTITUTE 1959. Report of the
committee on the protection of building timbers in South Africa against
termites, woodboring beetles and fungi, 2nd edn. CSIR Research Report
No. 169.
1 1 Tables
11.1 Each table should be presented on a separate sheet
and be assigned an Arabic numeral, i.e. the first table
mentioned in the text is marked Table 1'.
1 1 .2 In the captions of tables the word ‘table’ is written in
capital letters. See recent numbers of Bothalia for the
format required.
1 1 .3 Avoid vertical lines, if at all possible. Tables can often
be reduced in width by interchanging primary horizontal
and vertical heads.
12 Figures
12. 1 Figures should be planned to fit, after reduction, into
a width of either 80, 118 or 165 mm, with a maximum
266
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
vertical length of 230 mm. Allow space for the caption in
the case of figures that will occupy a whole page.
12.2 Line drawings, including graphs and diagrams,
should be in jet-black Indian ink, preferably on fine Felix
Schoeller parole or similar board, 200 gsm, or tracing film.
Lines should be bold enough and letters/symbols large
enough to stand reduction.
1 2.3 It is recommended that drawings should be twice the
size of the final reproduction.
1 2.4 Photographs should be of excellent quality on glossy
paper with clear detail and moderate contrast, and they
should be the same size as required in the journal.
12.5 Photograph mosaics should be submitted complete,
the component photographs mounted neatly on a white
flexible card base leaving a narrow gap of uniform width
(2 mm) between each print. Note that grouping photo-
graphs of markedly divergent contrast results in poor
reproductions.
12.6 Lettering and numbering on all figures should be
done in letraset, stencilling or a comparable method. If
symbols are to be placed on a dark background it is
recommended that black symbols are used on a small
white disk ± 7 mm in diameter and placed in the lower
left hand corner of the relevant photo.
12.7 If several illustrations are treated as components of a
single composite figure they should be designated by
capital letters.
12.8 Note that the word ‘Figure’ should be written out in
full, both in the text and the captions and should begin with
a capital ‘F’.
1 2.9 In the text the figure reference is then written as in
the following example: ‘The stamens (Figure 4A, B, C)
are...’
12.10 In captions, ‘figure’ is written in capital letters.
Magnification of figures should be given for the size as
submitted.
1 2. 1 1 Scale bars or scale lines should be used on figures.
12.12 In figures accompanying taxonomic papers, vou-
cher specimens should be given in the relevant caption.
12.13 Figures are numbered consecutively with Arabic
numerals in the order they are referred to in the text.
These numbers, as well as the author’s name and an
indication of the top of the figure, must be written in soft
pencil on the back of all figures.
12.14 Captions of figures must not be pasted under the
photograph or drawing.
12.15 Authors should indicate in pencil in the text where
they would like the figures to appear.
12.16 Authors wishing to have the originals of figures
returned must inform the editor in the original covering
letter and must mark each original ‘To be returned to
author’.
1 2. 17 Authors wishing to use illustrations already publish-
ed must obtain written permission before submitting the
manuscript and inform the editor of this fact.
12.18 Captions for figures should be collected together
and typed on a separate sheet headed Captions for figures.
12.19 It is strongly recommended that taxonomic articles
include dot maps as figures to show the distribution of
taxa. The dots used must be large enough to stand reduc-
tion to 80 mm (recommended size: letraset 5 mm
diameter).
12.20 Blank maps are available from the bookshop, NBI
Pretoria.
13 Text
13.1 Asa rule, authors should use the names as listed by
T.H. Arnold & B.C. de Wet (eds) in Memoirs of the
Botanical Sun’ey of South Africa No. 62.
13.2 Names of genera and infrageneric taxa are usually
underlined, with the author citation (where relevant) not
underlined. Exceptions include names of new taxa in the
abstract, correct names given in the synopsis or in para-
graphs on species excluded from a given supraspecific
group in taxonomic articles; in checklists and in indices,
where the position is reversed, correct names are not
underlined and synonyms are underlined.
13.3 Names above generic level are not underlined.
13.4 In articles dealing with taxonomy and closely related
subjects the complete scientific name of a plant (with
author citation) should be given at the first mention in the
text. The generic name should be abbreviated to the initial
thereafter, except where intervening references to other
genera with the same initial could cause confusion.
13.5 In normal text, Latin words are italicized, but in the
synopsis of a species, Latin words such as noni. nud. are
not italicized.
13.6 Names of authors of plant names should agree
with the list published by the Royal Botanic Gardens,
Kew, entitled, Authors of plant names , edited by R.K.
Brummitt & C.E. Powell (1992).
13.7 Modem authors not included in the list should use
their full name and initials when publishing new plant
names. Other author names not in the list should be in
agreement with the recommendations of the Code.
13.8 Names of authors of publications are written out in
full except in the synonymy in taxonomic articles where
they are treated like names of authors of plant names.
13.9 Names of plant collectors are underlined whenever
they are linked to the number of a specimen. The collec-
tion number is also underlined, e.g. Acocks 14407.
13. 10 Surnames beginning with ‘De’, ‘Du’ or ‘Van’ begin
with a capial letter unless preceded by an initial.
13.11 For measurements use only units of the International
System of Units (SI). In taxonomic papers only mm and
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
267
m, should be used; in ecological papers cm or m should
be used.
13.12 The use of ‘±’ is preferred to c. or ca.
13.13 Numbers ‘one’ to ‘nine’ are spelled out in normal
text, and from 10 onwards they are written in Arabic
numerals.
1 3. 14 In descriptions of plants, numerals are used through-
out. Write -2. 0-4. 5 (not 2-4.5). When counting members
write 2 or 3 (not 2-3) but 2-4.
13.15 Abbreviations should be used sparingly but con-
sistently. No full stops are placed after abbreviations en-
ding with the last letter of the full word (e.g. edition = edn;
editor = ed.), after units of measure, after compass direc-
tions and after herbarium designations.
13.16 Apart from multi-access keys, indented keys should
be used with couplets numbered la-lb, 2a-2b, etc.
(without full stops thereafter).
1 3. 17 Keys consisting of a single couplet have no number-
ing.
13.18 Manuscripts of keys should be presented as in the
following example:
la Leaves closely arranged on an elongated stem; a sub
merged aquatic with only the capitula exserted ... lb. E.
setaceum var. pumilum
1 b Leaves in basal rosettes; stems suppressed; small marsh
plants, ruderals or rarely aquatics:
2a Annuals, small, fast-growing pioneers, dying when the
habitat dries up; capitula without coarse white setae;
receptacles cylindrical:
3a Anthers white ... 2. E. cinereum
3b Anthers black ... 3. E. nigrum
2b Perennials, more robust plants; capitula sparsely to
densely covered with short setae:
1 3. 19 Herbarium voucher specimens should be referred to
wherever possible, not only in taxonomic articles.
14 Species treatment in taxonomic papers
14.1 The procedure to be followed is illustrated in the
example (17.9), which should be referred to, because not
all steps are described in full detail.
14.2 The correct name (not underlined) is to be followed
by its author citation (underlined) and the full literature
reference, with the name of the publication written out in
full (not underlined).
14.3 Thereafter all literature references, including those of
the synonyms, should only reflect author, page and year
of publication, e.g. C.E. Hubb. in Kew Bulletin 15: 307
(1960); Boris et al.\ 14 (1966); Boris: 89 (1967); Sims: t.
38 (1977); Sims: 67 (1980).
14.4 The description and the discussion should consist of
paragraphs commencing, where possible, with italicized
leader words such as flowering time, diagnostic charac-
ters, distribution and habitat.
1 4.5 When more than one species of a given genus is dealt
with in a paper, the correct name of each species should
be prefixed by a sequential number followed by a full stop,
the first line of the paragraph to be indented. Infraspecific
taxaare marked with small letters, e.g. lb., 12c., etc.
14.6 Names of authors are written in the same way (see
13.1, 1 3.6), irrespective of whether the person in question
is cited as the author of a plant name or of a publication.
14.7 The word ‘figure’ is written as ‘fig.’, and ‘t.’ is used
for both ‘plate’ and ‘tablet’.
14.8 Literature references providing good illustrations of
the species in question may be cited in a paragraph com-
mencing with the word leones followed by a colon. This
paragraph is given after the last paragraph of the syn-
onymy, see 1 7.9.
1 5 Citation of specimens
15.1 Type specimen in synopsis: the following should be
given (if available): country (if not in RSA), province, grid
reference (at least for new taxa), locality as given by
original collector, modem equivalent of collecting locality
in square brackets (if relevant), quarter-degree square,
date of collection (optional), collector's name and collect-
ing number (both underlined).
1 5.2 The abbreviation s.n. ( sine numero) is given after the
name of a collector who usually assigned numbers to his
collections but did not do so in the specimen in question.
The herbaria in which the relevant type(s) are housed are
indicated by means of the abbreviations given in the latest
edition of Index Herbariorum.
15.3 The holotype (holo.) and its location are mentioned
first, followed by a semicolon, the other herbaria are
arranged alphabetically, separated by commas.
1 5.4 Authors should indicate by means of an exclamation
mark (!) which of the types have been personally ex-
amined.
15.5 If only a photograph or microfiche was seen, write as
follows: Anon. 422 (X, holo.-BOL. photo.!).
15.6 Lectotypes or neotypes should be chosen for correct
names without a holotype. It is not necessary to lectotypify
synonyms.
1 5.7 When a lectotype or a neotype are newly chosen, this
should be indicated by using the phrase 'here designated’.
If reference is made to a previously selected lectotype or
neotype, the name of the designating author and the litera-
ture reference should be given. In cases where no type was
cited, and none has subsequently been nominated, this
may be stated as ‘not designated’.
15.8 In brief papers mentioning only a few species and a
few cited specimens the specimens should be arranged
according to the grid reference system: Provinces/ coun-
tries (typed in capitals) should be cited in the following
order: Namibia, Botswana, Northern Transvaal, North-
West, PWV, Eastern Transvaal, Orange Free State,
Swaziland, Kwa Zulu/Natal, Lesotho, and Northern
268
Bothalia 24,2 ( 1994)
Cape, Western Cape and Eastern Cape (see Figure 1, p.
269).
15.9 Grid references should be cited in numerical se-
quence.
15.10 Locality records for specimens should preferably be
given to within a quarter-degree square. Records from the
same one-degree square are given in alphabetical order, i.e
(-AC) precedes (-AD), etc. Records from the same
quarter-degree square are arranged alphabetically accord-
ing to the collectors' names; the quarter-degree references
must be repeated for each specimen cited.
15.11 The relevant international code of the herbaria in
which a collection was seen should be given in brackets
after the collection number; the codes are separated by
commas. The following example will explain the proce-
dure:
KWAZULU/NATAL. — 2731 (Louwsburg): l6kmEof Nongoma.(-DD),
Pelser 354 (BM, K. PRE); near Dwarsrand, Van der Merwe 4789 (BOL,
M). 2829 (Harrismith): near Groothoek, (-AB), Smith 234\ Koffiefon-
tein, (-AB), Taylor 720 (PRE); Cathedral Peak Forest Station, (-CC),
Marriot 74 (KMG); Wilgerfontein, Roux 426. Grid ref. unknown:
Sterkstroom, Strydom 12 (NBG).
15.12 For records from outside southern Africa authors
should use degree squares without names, e.g.:
KENYA. — 0136: Nairobi plains beyond race course, Napier 485.
15.13 Monographs and revisions: in the case of all major
works of this nature it is assumed that the author has
investigated the relevant material in all major herbaria and
that he has provided the specimens seen with determinavit
labels. It is assumed further that the author has submitted
distribution maps for all relevant taxa and that the distribu-
tion has been described briefly in words in the text. Under
the heading ‘Vouchers’ no more than five specimens
should be cited, indicating merely the collector and the
collector’s number (both underlined). Specimens are al-
phabetically arranged according to collector’s name. If
more than one specimen by the same collector is cited,
they are arranged numerically and separated by a comma.
The purpose of the cited specimens is not to indicate
distribution but to convey the author’s concept of the taxon
in question.
1 5. 14 The herbaria in which the specimens are housed are
indicated by means of the abbreviation given in the latest
edition of Index Herbariorum . They are given between
brackets, arranged alphabetically and separated by com-
mas behind every specimen as in the following example:
Vouchers: T.H. Arnold 64 (PRE); Fisher 840 (NH, NU, PRE); Flanagan
831 (GRA, PRE), 840 (NH, PRE); Marloth 4926 (PRE, STE); Schelpe
6161. 6163, 6405 (BOL); Schlechter 4451 (BM, BOL, GRA, K, PRE).
15.15 If long lists of specimens are given, they must be
listed together before Acknowledgements under the head-
ing Specimens examined. They are arranged alphabetical-
ly by the collector’s name and then numerically for each
collector. The species is indicated in brackets by the num-
ber that was assigned to it in the text and any infraspecific
taxa by a small letter. If more than one genus is dealt with
in a given article, the first species of the first genus men-
tioned is indicated as 1.1. This is followed by the interna-
tional herbarium designation. Note that the name of the
collector and the collection number are underlined:
Acocks 12497 (2.1b) BM, K, PRE; 14724 (1.13a) BOL, K, P. Archer
1507 ( 1 .4) BM, G. Burchell 2847 { 2.8c) MB, K. Bitnnan 2401 (3.3) MO,
S. B.L. Bunt 789 (2.6) B, KMG, STE.
16 Synonyms
1 6. 1 In a monograph or a revision covering all of southern
Africa, all synonyms based on types of southern African
origin, or used in southern African literature, should be
included.
1 6.2 Illegitimate names are designated by nom. illeg. after
the reference, followed by non with the author and date, if
there is an earlier homonym.
16.3 Nomina nuda ( nom. nud.) and invalidly published
names are excluded unless there is a special reason to cite
them, for example if they have been used in prominent
publications.
16.4 In normal text Latin words are italicized, but in the
synopsis of a species Latin words such as nom. nud. are
not italicized.
16.5 Synonyms should be arranged chronologically into
groups of nomenclatural synonyms, i.e. synonyms based
on the same type, and the groups should be arranged
chronologically by basionyms, except for the basionym of
the correct name which is dealt with in the paragraph
directly after that of the correct name.
16.6 When a generic name is repeated in a given synony-
my it should be abbreviated to the initial, except where
intervening references to other genera with the same initial
could cause confusion.
1 7 Description and example of species treatment
1 7. 1 Descriptions of all taxa of higher plants should, where
possible, follow the sequence: Habit; sexuality; under-
ground parts (if relevant). Indumentum (if it can be easily
described for the whole plant). Stems/branches. Bark.
Leaves : arrangement, petiole absent/present, pubescence;
blade: shape, size, apex, base, margin; midrib: above/
below, texture, colour; petiole; stipules. Inflorescence :
type, shape, position; bracts/bracteoles. Flowers', shape,
sex. Receptacle. Calyx. Corolla. Disc. Androecium. Gyno-
ecium. Fruit. Seeds. Chromosome number. Figure (word
written out in full) number.
17.2 As a rule, shape should be given before measure-
ments.
1 7.3 In general, if an organ has more than one of the parts
being described, use the plural, otherwise use the singular,
for example, petals of a flower but blade of a leaf.
17.4 Language must be as concise as possible, using
participles instead of verbs.
1 7.5 Dimension ranges should be cited as in 17.9.
17.6 Care must be exercised in the use of dashes and
hyphens. A hyphen is a short stroke joining two syllables
of a word, e.g. ovate-lanceolate or sea-green, with no
space between the letter and the stroke. An N-dash (en) is
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
269
a longer stroke commonly used instead of the word ‘to’
between numerals, ‘2-5 mm long’ (do not use it between
words but rather use the word ‘to’, e.g. ‘ovate to
lanceolate’); it is produced by typing three hyphens next
to each other. An M-dash (em) is a stroke longer than an
N-dash and is used variously, e.g. in front of a subspecific
epithet in stead of the full species name; it is produced by
typing two hyphens next to one another.
17.7 The use of ‘±’ is preferred to c. or ca when describing
shape, measurements, dimensions, etc.
17.8 The decimal point replaces the comma in all units
of measurement, e.g. leaves 1.0-1. 5 mm long.
17.9 Example:
1. Bequaertiodendron magalismontanum ( Sond .) Heine &
Hemsl. in Kew Bulletin: 307 ( 1960); Codd: 72 ( 1964); Elsdon: 75 (1980).
Type: PWV, Magaliesberg, Zeyher 1849 (S, holo.-BOL, photo.!).
Chrysophyllum magalismontanum Sond.: 721 (1850); Harv.: 812
(1867); Engl.: 434 (1904); Bottmar: 34 (1919). Zeyherella magalismon-
tana (Sond.) Aubrev. & Pellegr.: 105 (1958); Justin: (1973).
Chrysophyllum argyrophyllum Hiem: 721 (1850); Engl.: 43 (1904).
Boivinella argyrophylla (Hiem) Aubrev. & Pellegr.: 37 ( 1958); Justin: 98
(1973). Types: Angola, Welwitsch 4828 (BM!, lecto., here designated;
PRE!); Angola, Welwitsch 4872 (BM!).
Chrysophyllum wilmsii Engl.: 4, t. 16 (1904); Masonet: 77 (1923);
Woodson: 244 ( 1937). Boivinella wilmsii (Engl.) Aubrev. & Pellegr.: 39
(1958); Justin: 99 (1973). Type: Eastern Transvaal. Magoebaskloof,
Wilms 1812 (B, holo.t; K!, P!, lecto., designated by Aubrev. & Pellegr.:
38 (1958), PRE!, S!,W!,Z!).
Bequaertiodendron fruticosa De Wild.: 37 (1923), non Bonpl.: 590
(1823); D. Bakker: 167 (1929); H. Fr.: 302 (1938); Davy: 640 (1954);
Breytenbach: 117(1959); Clausen: 720 ( 1968); Palmer: 34 (1969). Type:
Eastern Transvaal, Tzaneen Dist., Granville 3665 (K, holo.!; G!, P!,
PRE!, S!).
B. fragrans auct. non Oldemann: Glover: 149, t. 19 (1915); Henkel:
226 (1934); Stapelton: 6 (1954).
leones: Harv.: 812 (1867); Henkel: t. 84 (1934?; Codd: 73 (1964);
Palmer: 35 (1969).
Woody perennial; main branches up to 0.4 m long,
erect or decumbent, grey woolly-felted, leafy. Leaves
linear to oblanceolate, 3— 1 0(— 23) x 1.0-1.5(-4.0) mm, ob-
tuse, base broad, half-clasping. Heads heterogamous, cam-
panulate, 7-8 x 5 mm, solitary, sessile at tip of axillary
shoots; involucral bracts in 5 or 6 series, inner exceeding
flowers, tips subopaque, white, very acute. Receptacle
nearly smooth. Flowers ± 23-30, 7-11 male, 16-21
bisexual, yellow, tipped pink. Achenes ± 0.75 mm long,
elliptic. Pappus bristles very many, equalling corolla,
scabridulous. Chromosome number. 2n = 22. Figure 23B.
1 8 New taxa
1 8. 1 The name of a new taxon must be accompanied by at
least a Latin diagnosis. Authors should not provide full-
length Latin descriptions unless they have the required
expertise in Latin at their disposal.
18.2 It is recommended that descriptions of new taxa be
accompanied by a good illustration (line drawing or
photograph ) and a distribution map.
18.3 Example:
109. Helichrysum jubilatum Hilliard , sp. nov. H.
alsinoidei DC. affinis, sed foliis ellipticis (nec spatulatis),
inflorescentiis compositis a foliis non circumcinctis,
floribus femineis numero quasi dimidium hermaphrodi-
torum aequantibus (nec capitulis homogamis vel floribus
femineis 1-3 tantum) distinguitur.
Herba annua e basi ramosa; caules erecti vel decum-
bentes, 100-250 mm longi, tenuiter albo-lanati, remote
foliati. Folia plerumque 8-30 x 5-15 mm, sub capitulis
minora, elliptica vel oblanceolata, obtusa vel acuta,
mucronata, basi semi-amplexicauli, utrinque cano-lanato-
arachnoidea. Capitula heterogama, campanulata, 3. 5-4.0
x 2.5 mm, pro parte maxima in paniculas cymosas ter-
minates aggregata; capitula subterminalia interdum
solitaria vel 2-3 ad apices ramulorum nudorum ad 30 mm
longorum. Bracteae involucrales 5-seriatae, gradatae, ex-
teriores pellucidae, pallide stramineae, dorso lanatae,
seriebus duabus interioribus subaequalibus et flores quasi
aequantibus, apicibus obtusis opacis niveis vix radian-
tibus. Receptaculum fere laeve. Flores ± 35—41. Achenia
0.75 mm longa, pilis myxogenis praedita. Pappi setae
multae, corollam aequantes, apicibus scabridis, basibus
non cohaerentibus.
TYPE. — Northern Cape, 2817 (Vioolsdrif): Rich-
ters veld, (-CC), ± 5 miles E of Lekkersing on road to
Stinkfontein, kloof in hill south of road, annual, disc
whitish, 7-11-1962, Nordenstam 1823 (S, holo.; E, NH,
PRE).
19 New provinces of South Africa (May 1994)
FIGURE 1. — 1, Western Cape; 2, Eastern Cape; 3, Northern Cape; 4,
Orange Free State; 5, KwaZulu/Natal; 6, North-West (north-
eastern Cape and southwestern Transvaal); 7, PWV (Pretoria-Wit-
watersrand-Vereeniging); 8, Eastern Transvaal; 9, Northern
Transvaal.
20 Proofs
Only page proofs are normally sent to authors. They
should be corrected in red ink and be returned to the editor
as soon as possible.
270
Bothalia 24,2 (1994)
21 Reprints
Authors receive 100 reprints free. If there is more than
one author, this number will have to be shared between
them.
22 Documents consulted
Guides to authors of the following publications were
made use of in the compilation of the present guide: An-
nals of the Missouri Botanic Garden, Botanical Journal
of the Linnean Society, Flora of Australia, Smithsonian
Con- tributions to Botany, South African Journal of
Botany (including instructions to authors of taxonomic
papers), South African Journal of Science.
23 Address of editor
Manuscripts should be submitted to: The Editor,
Bothalia, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101,
Pretoria 0001.
INDEX
abbreviation, 13.4. 13.5, 13.12, 13.15, 14.7, 15.2, 15.14, 16.2, 16.3, 16.4,
16.6
abstract (uittreksel), 3.2, 7, 13.2
acknowledgements, 9
address of
authors, 3.3, 4
editor, 23
alphabetical, 6, 10.3, 10.9, 10.10, 15.3, 15.10, 15.13, 15.14, 15.15
Arabic numerals, 11.1, 12.13, 13.3
ARNOLD, T.H. & DE WET, B.C. (eds) 1993. Plants of southern Africa:
names and distribution. Memoirs of llw Botanical Survey of South
Africa No. 62, 1 3. 1
ASCII, 2. 1
author(s), 1, 3.1, 4, 10.15, 12.15
address, 3.3, 4
citation, 5, 7.3, 13.2, 13.4, 14.2
first, 10.2
names, 3.3, 10.3, 10.7, 10.9, 10.11, 10.14, 12.13, 13.7, 13.8, 14.3,
14.6, 15.7, 16.2
names of plant names, 13.6, 13.7, 13.8
senior, 10.10
book reviews, 1, 3.4
books, 10.4, 10.12, 10.13, 10.15
Bothalia, 1,3.2, 11.2, 22
brief taxonomic articles, 15.8
BRUMMITT, R.K. & POWELL, C.E. (eds) 1992. Authors of plant
names. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 1 3.6
c„ 13.2, 17.7
ca, 13.2, 17.7
capitals, 11.2, 12.7, 12.10, 14.2, 15.8
captions, 3.1, 3.4, 3.5, 11.2, 12.8, 12.10, 12.12, 12.14, 12.18
checklist, 13.2
chromosome number, 17.1, 17.9
chronological sequence, 10.3, 10.6, 10.9, 16.5
citation
author, 5, 7.3, 13.2, 13.4, 14.2
literature, 14.4
of specimens, 15
cm, 13.1 1
collection
date, 15.1
number, 13.9, 15.1, 15.2, 15.11, 15.13, 15.15
collective book, 10.15
collector, 13.9, 15.1, 15.2, 15.10, 15.13, 15.15
colon, 2.13
comma, 2.13, 15.13
compass directions, 13.15
composite figure, 12.7
congress proceedings, 10. 1 5
contents, 8
correspondence, 4
countries, 6.7, 15.8
decimal point, 17.8
description and example of species treatment, 17
diagrams, 12.2
discussion, 3.4, 14.4
diskette, 1, 2, 2.4
distribution maps, 12.19, 12.20. 15.13, 18.2
documents consulted, 22
dot maps, 12.19, 12.20, 15.13, 18.2
double
line spacing, 2.4
space, 3.1, 2.13
drawing paper, 1 2.2
drawings, 12.2
edition, 13.15
editor, 13.15,22
editorial
board, 1
policy, 1
etal., 10.2, 13.6, 14.3
example of
new taxa, 18.3
species treatment, 17.9
exclamation mark, 2.13, 15.4
family name, 5, 6.7
fig., 14.7
figure(s), 12, 14.7, 17.1
reduction of, 12.1, 12.2, 12.19
returned, 12.16
first author, 1 0.2
flora, 1, 10.15
footnote, 3.3
full stop, 2.13, 13.15, 13.16, 14.5
genera, 13.2
generic name, 13.3, 13.4, 16.6
geographical area, 7.2
granting agencies, 3.3
graphs, 12.2
grid reference system, 15.1, 15.8, 15.9, 15.11
headings, 2.7, 2.9
sequence of, 3.3, 3.4
herbaria, 15.2, 15.3, 15.11, 15.13, 15.14
herbarium
code. 15.11
designations, 13.15, 15.15
voucher specimens, 12.12, 13.19
holo., 15.5, 17.9, 18.3
hololype, 15.3, 15.6
homonym, 16.2
hyphenated words, 2.6
hyphen, 2.10-2.12, 17.6
IBM compatible, 2.1
icones, 10.2, 17.9
illegitimate names (nom. illeg.), 16.2
illustrations, 12.3, 12.7, 12.17, 14.8
previously published, 12.17
Index Herbariorum, 15.2, 15.14
index of names, 3.4
infrageneric taxa, 13.2
initials, 9, 10.5, 13.7
in prep., 10. 15
in preparation, 10. 1 5
in press, 10.15
International
Code of Botanical Nomenclature, 13.7
System of Units (SI), 13.11
invalidly published names, 16.3
italics/underlining, 7.4, 10.12, 13.2, 13.3, 13.5, 13.9, 14.2, 15.1, 15.13,
15.15
journals, 10.4, 10.12, 10.15
names of, 10.1, 10.13
justify, 2.5
keys, 2.7, 2.16, 13.16, 13.17, 13.18
keywords, 3.3, 3.4, 6
Latin, 13.5, 15.2, 16.2, 16.3, 16.4
descriptions, 18.1
layout, 3.2
leclo., 15.6, 15.7, 17.9
leclotype, 15.6, 15.7, 17.9
Bothalia 24,2(1994)
271
letraset, 12.6, 12.19
lettering, 12.6
line
drawings, 12.2, 18.2
spacing, 2.4, 2.9
literature
citations, 14.4
references, 3.1, 10, 10.7
within synonymy, 10.7, 14.8
localities outside southern Africa, 15.12
locality, 15.1, 15.10
m, 13.11
magnification of figures, 12.3, 12.10
manuscript
language, 1
requirements, 3
map, distribution, dot, 12.19, 12.20, 15.13, 18.2, 19
M-dash, 2.12, 17.6
mm, 13.1 1
margin, 2.7,2.16, 3.1, 17.1
material, 3.3, 3.4
measurements, 13.11, 17.2, 17.7, 17.8
methods, 3.4, 6.10.3
microfiche, 15.5
miscellaneous paper, 10.15
monograph, 3.4, 15.13, 16.1
MS Word 5.5, 2.1, 2.8
name
collector’s, 15. 10
illegitimate, 16.2
in validly published, 16.3
name(s)
of author(s), 3.3, 10.7, 10.9, 10.11, 10.14, 13.7, 13.8, 14.6
of authors of plant names, 5, 13.1, 13.2, 13.6, 14.6
of publications, 13.8
plant collectors, 13.9
provinces of South Africa, 19
publication, 14.2
taxa, 2.16, 5, 7.4, 10.8, 13.2, 13.3
N-dash, 2.11, 17.6
neotype, 15.6, 15.7
new
combinations, 7.4
provinces of South Africa (May 1994), 19
taxa, 7.4, 13.2, 13.7, 15.7, 18
nom. illeg., 16.2
nom. nud., 13.5, 16.3, 16.4
notes, 1, 3.4, 10.15
technical, 10.15
number
chromosome, 17.1, 17.9
page, 2.2
numbering, 13.13
figures, 12.6, 12.13, 17.1
keys, 13.16, 13.17
pages, 3.5, 1 3.4
taxa, 2.16, 7.2, 13.4, 14.5, 15.15
numerals, Arabic, 11.1, 12.13, 13.3
PC diskettes, 1, 2
pers. comm., 10.5
personal communications (pers. comm.), 10.5, 10.8
photocopies, 3.1
photograph, 12.4, 12.14, 15.5, 18.2
mosaic, 12.5
plant name. 5, 13.4, 13.6, 13.7, 13.8, 14.6
plate (t.), 14.7
prepositions, 6.4
proceedings, 10.15
proofs, 20
provinces, 6.7, 15.1, 15.8
publications, 10.8, 13.8, 14.3
name of, 14.2
solo, 10.10
year of, 10.9, 14.3
quarter-degree squares, 15.1, 15.10
quotes, 2. 1 5
reduction of figures, 12.1, 12.2, 12.19
referees, 1
reference, 3.4, 10.6, 10.7, 10.9, 10.15
figure, 12.9
grid, 15.1, 15.8, 15.9, 15.11
list, 10.5, 10.8, 10.9
literature, 3.1, 10, 10.7
report, 10.15
reprints, 21
requirements for
diskette, 2
manuscript, 3
results, 3.4
revision, 3.4, 8, 15.13, 16.1
scale bar, 12.1 1
semicolon, 2.13, 10.3, 15.3, 15.13
senior author, 10.10
sequence of headings, 3.3, 3.4
short notes, 1, 3.4
single line spacing, 2.4
special character, 3.7
species treatment in taxonomic papers, 14
specimens examined. 3.4. 15.5
STAFLEU, F.A. & COWAN, R.S. 1976-1988. Taxonomic literature.
Vols 1-7, 10.13
stiffies, 1
surnames, 13.10
symbols, 12.6
synopsis, 13.2, 13.5, 15.1, 16.4
synonymy, 10.7, 13.8, 14.4, 14.8, 16.6
t„ 14.3, 14.7, 17.9
table, 2.3, 3.1, 3.4, 3.5, 11
of contents, 8
tablet (t.), 14.7
taxa
name of, 2.16, 5, 7.4, 10.8, 13.2, 13.3
new, 7.4, 13.2, 13.7, 15.7, 18
numbering of, 2.16, 7.2, 13.4, 14.5, 15.15
taxonomic
articles/papers, 7.2, 10.8, 12.12, 12.19, 13.2, 13.8, 14
revision, 8
taxonomy, 5, 7.3, 13.4, 15.8
technical note, 10. 15
text, 3.1, 10.1, 10.4, 10.5, 10.8, 11.1, 12.8, 12.9, 12.13, 12.15, 13,15.13,
15.15, 16.4
thesis, 10.15
times sign, 2.14
title, 3.3, 5, 6.9, 6.11
of books, 10.4, 10.12, 10.13, 10.15
of journals, 10.4, 10.12, 10.13, 10.15
page, 1, 3.3, 3.5
type, 15.2, 15.4, 15.7, 16.1, 16.6, 17.9
here designated, 15.7, 17.9
not designated, 15.7
specimen, 15.1
underlining/italics, 7.4, 10.12, 13.2, 13.3, 13.5, 13.9, 14.2, 15.1, 15.13,
15.15
uittreksel (abstract), 7. 1
units of measure, 13.11, 13.15
unpublished article, 10.15
vouchers, 15.13, 15. 14
voucher specimens, 12.12, 13.19
World list of scientific periodicals , 10.13
year of publication, 10.9, 14.3
BOTHALIA
Volume 24,2 , Oct./Okt. 1994
CONTENTS— INHOUD
1. Studies in the Ericoideae (Ericaceae) XV. The generic relationship between Erica and Ericinella. E.G.H.
OLIVER 121
2. A taxonomic re-assessment of Ammocharis herrei and Cybistetes longifolia (Amaryllideae: Amaryl-
lidaceae). D.A. SNIJMAN and G. WILLIAMSON 127
3. Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from southern Africa. 6. The genus Asterella (Aytoniaceae :
Reboulioideae) and its four local species. S.M. PEROLD 133
4. Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from southern Africa. 7. The genus Cryptomitrium (Aytoniaceae)
and C. oreades sp. nov. S.M. PEROLD 149
5. A new serotinous species of Cliffortia (Rosaceae) from the southwestern Cape with notes on Cliffortia
arborea. E.G.H. OLIVER and A.C. FELLINGHAM 153
6. FSA contributions 1: Aquifoliaceae. S. ANDREWS 163
7. Notes on African plants:
Boraginaceae. Lobostemon regulareflorus — the correct name for L. grandiflorus. M.H. BUYS and
J.J.A. VAN DER WALT 170
Proteaceae. Anew species of Leucospennum from the southwestern Cape. J.P ROURKE 167
8. An overview of Aspergillus (Hyphomycetes) and associated teleomorphs in southern Africa. A. LOUISE
SCHUTTE 171
9. The taxonomic value of epidermal characters in the leaf of Heteromorpha and some related genera
(Apiaceae). P.J.D. WINTER and B-E. VAN WYK 187
10. Inflorescence morphology of Laclmaea and Cryptadenia (Thymelaeaceae). J.B.P. BEYERS and J.J.A.
VAN DER WALT 195
11. Morphological and ultrastructural variations in Schizaea pectinata (Schizaeaceae: Pteridophyta). B.M.
PARKINSON 203
12. Plant defences against mammalian herbivores: are juvenile Acacia more heavily defended than mature
trees? R. BROOKS and N. OWEN-SMITH 211
13. The saltmarsh vegetation of Langebaan Lagoon. M. O’CALLAGHAN 217
14. The saltmarsh vegetation of the lower Berg River. M. O’ CALLAGHAN 223
15. The saltmarsh vegetation of the lower Uilkraals River. M. O’CALLAGHAN 229
16. The marsh vegetation of Kleinmond Lagoon. M. O’CALLAGHAN 235
1 7. Chromosome studies on African plants. 1 1 . The tribe Andropogoneae (Poaceae: Panicoideae). J.J. SPIES,
T.H. TROSKIE, E. VAN DER VYVER and S.M.C. VAN WYK 241
18. National Botanical Institute: list of staff and publications, 31st March 1994. Compiler: B. A. MOMBERG 247
19. Book reviews 261
20. Guide for authors to Bothalia (including new provinces of South Africa, May 1994) 263
Abstracted, indexed or listed in/opgesom, in indeks opgeneem of gelys in: AGRICOLA, Biological Abstracts, Biological Abstracts/Reports, Reviews,
and Meetings, BIOSIS Document Express, Current Advances in Plant Science, Current Contents, Field Crop Abstracts, Forestry Abstracts, Herbage
Abstracts, Excerpta Botanica, Revue of Plant Pathology, Revue of Medical and Veterinary Mycology and /en The Kew Record of Taxonomic Literature.
ISSN 0006 8241
© Published by and obtainable from/gepubliseer deur en verkrygbaar van: National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001, South
Africa/Nasionale Botaniese Instituut, Privaatsak X 101 , Pretoria 000 1, Suid-Afrika. Typesetting/kopieset: S.S. Brink (NB1). Reproduction and printing
by/reproduksie en drukwerk deur: Aurora Printers, P.O. Box 422, Pretoria ()(M) 1 /Aurora Drukkers, Posbus 422, Pretoria 001. Tel. (012) 327-5073.