Bothalia
‘N TYDSKRIF VIR PLANTKUNDIGE NAVORSING
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Vol. 25,2
Oct./Okt. 1995
TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS OL THE NATIONAL BOTANICAL INSTITUTE, PRETORIA
TEGNIESE PUBLIKASIES VAN DIE NASIONALE BOTANIESE INSTITUUT, PRETORIA
Obtainable from the National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X 1 0 1 ,
Pretoria 0001, Republic of South Africa. A catalogue of all available
publications will be issued on request.
BOTHALIA
Bothalia is named in honour of General Louis Botha, first Premier and
Minister of Agriculture of the Union of South Africa. This house journal
of the National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, is devoted to the furtherance
of botanical science. The main fields covered are taxonomy, ecology,
anatomy and cytology. Two parts of the journal and an index to contents,
authors and subjects are published annually.
A booklet of the contents to Vols 1-20 is available.
STRELITZIA
A series of occasional publications on southern African flora, replacing
Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa and Annals of Kirsten-
bosch Botanic Gardens. Published: 1 & 2.
Verkrygbaar van die Nasionale Botaniese Instituut, Privaatsak X 1 0 1 ,
Pretoria 0001, Republiek van Suid-Afrika. ‘n Katalogus van alle beskik-
bare publikasies kan aangevra word.
Bothalia is vemoem ter ere van Generaal Louis Botha, eerste Eerste Minister
en Minister van Landbou van die Unie van Suid-Afrika. Hierdie lyfblad van
die Nasionale Botaniese Instituut, Pretoria, is gewy aan die bevordering van
die wetenskap van plantkunde. Die hoofgebiede wat gedek word, is tak-
sonomie, ekologie, anatomie en sitologie. Twee dele van die tydskrif en ‘n
indeks van die inhoud, outeurs en onderwerpe verskyn jaarliks.
"n Inhoudsopgawe tot Vols 1-20 is beskikbaar.
'n Reeks ongereelde publikasies oor die flora van suidelike Afrika.
Vervang Memoirs van die Botaniese Opname van Suid-Afrika en Annals
of Kirstenbosch Botanic Gardens. Gepubliseer: 1 & 2.
MEMOIRS OF THE BOTANICAL SURVEY OF SOUTH AFRICA
The memoirs are individual treatises usually of an ecological nature, but ‘n Reeks van losstaande omvattende verhandelings oor vernaamlik eko-
sometimes dealing with taxonomy or economic botany. Published: Nos logiese, maar soms ook taksonomiese of plantekonomiese onderwerpe.
1-63 (some out of print). Discontinued after No. 63. Gepubliseer: Nos 1-63 (sommige uit druk). Gestaak na No. 63.
ANNALS OF KIRSTENBOSCH BOTANIC GARDENS
A series devoted to the publication of monographs and major works
on southern African flora. Published: Vol. 14-19 (earlier volumes
published as Supplementary volumes to the Journal of South African
Botany). Discontinued after No. 19.
FLOWERING PLANTS OF AFRICA (FPA)
This serial presents colour plates of African plants with accompanying
text. The plates are prepared mainly by the artists at the National
Botanical Institute. Many well known botanical artists have contributed
to the series, such as Cythna Letty (over 700 plates), Kathleen Lansdell,
Stella Gower, Betty Connell, Peter Bally and Fay Anderson. The Editor
is pleased to receive living plants of general interest or of economic value
for illustration.
From Vol. 55, twenty plates will be published at irregular intervals.
An index to Vols 1^-9 is available.
FLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA (FSA)
A taxonomic treatise on the flora of the Republic of South Africa, Lesotho,.
Swaziland, Namibia and Botswana. The FSA contains descriptions of
families, genera, species, infraspecific taxa, keys to genera and species,
synonymy, literature and limited specimen citations, as well as taxonomic
and ecological notes.
Contributions to the FSA will also appear in Bothalia.
PALAEOFLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA
A palaeoflora on a pattern comparable to that of the Flora of
southern Africa. Much of the information is presented in the form
of tables and photographic plates depicting fossil populations. Now
available:
'n Reeks gewy aan die publikasie van monografiee en belangrike werke oor
flora van suidelike Afrika. Gepubliseer: Vol. 14— 19 (vroeere volumes gepub-
liseer as Supplementary volumes van die Journal of South African Botany).
Gestaak na No. 19.
Hierdie reeks bied kleurplate van Afrikaanse plante met bygaande teks.
Die skilderye word meestal deur die kunstenaars van die Nasionale
Botaniese Instituut voorberei. Talle bekende botaniese kunstenaars het
tot die reeks bygedra, soos Cythna Letty (meer as 700 plate), Kathleen
Lansdell, Stella Gower, Betty Connell, Peter Bally en Fay Anderson. Die
Redakteur verwelkom lewende plante van algemene belang of ekonomi-
ese waarde vir afbeelding.
Vanaf Vol. 55 sal 20 plate op ‘n keer met ongereelde tussenposes gepub-
liseer word..
‘n Indeks tot Vols 1 — 49 is beskikbaar.
‘n Taksonomiese verhandeling oor the flora van die Republiek van Suid-Af-
rika, Lesotho, Swaziland, Namibie en Botswana. Die FSA bevat beskry-
wings van families, genusse, spesies, infraspesifieke taksons, sleutels tot
genusse en spesies, sinonimie, literatuur, verwysings na enkele eksemplare,
asook beknopte taksonomiese en ekologiese aantekeninge.
Bydraes tot die FSA sal ook in Bothalia verskyn.
‘n Paleoflora met ‘n uitleg vergelykbaar met die van die Flora van
suidelike Afrika. Baie van die inligting word aangebied in die vorm van
tabelle en fotografiese plate waarop fossiele populasies afgebeeld word.
Reeds beskikbaar:
Molleno Formation (Triassic) Vol. 1 . Introduction. Dicroidium, by/deur J.M. & H.M. Anderson.
Molteno Formation (Triassic) Vol. 2. Gymnosperms (excluding Dicroidium ), by/deur J.M. & H.M. Anderson.
Prodromus of South African Megafloras. Devonian to Lower Cretaceous, by/deur J.M. & H.M. Anderson. Obtain-
able from/Beskikbaar van: A. A. Balkema Marketing, Box/Posbus 317, Claremont 7735, RSA.
BOTHALIA
'N TYDSKRIF VIR PLANTKUNDIGE NAVORSING
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Volume 25,2
Scientific EditorAVetenskaplike Redakteur: O.A. Leistner
Technical Editor/Tegniese Redakteur: B.A. Momberg
NATIONAL
^Botanical
INSTITUTE
NASIONALE BOTANIE*
INSTITUUT S
| Private b>ag X101 PRETORiAOOC
1995 -12- 0 1
I X tgr h-r?~TORtA
I national F o-TA^c^-iL
(MSTiTunrE
2 Cussonia Avenue, Brummeria, Pretoria
Private Bag XI 01, Pretoria 0001
ISSN 0006 8241
Oct./Okt.l995
Editorial Board/Redaksieraad
D.F. Cutler
B.J. Huntley
P.H. Raven
J.P. Rourke
M.J. Werger
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK
National Botanical Institute, Cape Town, RSA
Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, USA
Compton Herbarium, NBI, Cape Town, RSA
University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
CONTENTS— INHOUD
Volume 25,2
1. Three subspecies of Pelargonium laevigatum (Geraniaceae). C.M. VAN WYK (nee SCHONKEN) and J.J.A.
VAN DER WALT 133
2. A systematic study of the genus Pseudopentameris (Arundinoideae: Poaceae). N.P. BARKER 141
3. A note on Combretum subgenus Combretum section Macrostigmatea (Combretaceae). E.F. HENNESSY and
S. RODMAN 149
4. New records and new species of Asclepiadaceae from Namibia. P.V. BRUYNS 155
5. An annotated list of Urediniomycetes (rust fungi) from South Africa 1 : Melampsoraceae and Pucciniaceae,
excluding Puccinia and Uromyces. M. VAN REENEN 173
6. Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from southern Africa. 9. The genus Marchantia and its five local
species. S.M. PEROLD 183
7. New combinations and a complete list of Asparagus species in southern Africa (Asparagaceae). A.C.
FELLINGHAM and N.L. MEYER 205
8. The taxonomic history of the Ricciaceae (1937-1995) and a classification of sub-Saharan Ricciae. S.M.
PEROLD 211
9. Notes on African plants:
Author citation ‘ex Krauss’ in nomenclature. B.A. MOMBERG 245
Asteraceae. A note on Ursinia brachyloba. P.P.J. HERMAN 244
Asteraceae. A new combination in Cotula. P.P.J. HERMAN 244
Boraginaceae. Typification of the sections in Lobostemon. M.H. BUYS and J.J.A. VAN DER WALT 233
Cyperaceae. New records for southern Africa and KwaZulu-Natal. J. BROWNING, K.D. GORDON-
GRAY and C.J. WARD 238
Ericaceae. A new species of Erica from the Western Cape. E.G.H. OLIVER 242
Lunulariaceae. Fruiting Lunularia cruciata , now also reported from southern Africa. S.M. PEROLD 239
Podocarpaceae. Notes on Podocarpus in southern Africa and Madagascar. O.A. LEISTNER, G.F.
SMITH and H.F. GLEN 233
Pteridophyta. New distribution records of South African pteridophytes. J.E. BURROWS and N.R.
CROUCH 236
10. The psocid Liposcelis bostrychophilus Badonnel (Psocoptera: Liposcelidae): an occasional herbarium pest.
E. RETIEF, A. NICHOLAS and H. BAIJNATH 247
1 1 . Obituaries: Winsome (Buddy) Barker (1907-1994). J.P. ROURKE 255
Alan Percy-Lancaster (1944-1995). G.F. SMITH and H.F. GLEN 259
Friedrich von Breitenbach OMS (1916-1995). H.F. GLEN and W.G. WELMAN 260
12. National Botanical Institute: list of staff and publications, 31st March 1995. Compiler: B.A. MOMBERG 265
13. Guide for authors to Bothalia 277
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2016
https://archive.org/details/bothaliavolume2525unse_0
Bothalia 25,2: 133-139(1995)
Three subspecies of Pelargonium laevigatum (Geraniaceae)
C.M. VAN WYK* (nee SCHONKEN) and J.J.A. VAN DER WALT**
Keywords: Geraniaceae, Pelargonium laevigatum , subspecies, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
Pelargonium laevigatum (L. f.) Willd. is a variable species. The macromorphology, anatomy of the leaves, chromosome
numbers and geographical distribution of the species were studied, and it is concluded that three subspecies should be
distinguished. The subsp. diversifolium (Wendl.) Schonken stat. nov. and subsp. oxyphyllum (DC.) Schonken stat. nov. were
originally described as species. A key to identify the three subspecies, a distribution map, and illustrations of the macromor-
phological characters as well as anatomical features of the leaves, are provided.
UITTREKSEL
Pelargonium laevigatum (L. f.) Willd. is 'n varierende spesie. Die makromorfologie, anatomie van die blare, chromosoom-
getalle en geografiese verspreiding van die spesie is bestudeer en daar is tot die gevolgtrekking gekom dat drie subspesies
onderskei moet word. Die subsp. diversifolium (Wendl.) Schonken stat. nov. en subsp. oxyphyllum (DC.) Schonken stat. nov.
is oorspronklik as spesies beskryf. ‘n Sleutel om die drie subspesies te identifiseer, 'n verspreidingskaart, en illustrasies van die
makromorfologiese kenmerke sowel as anatomiese kenmerke van die blare, word voorsien.
INTRODUCTION
Harvey (1860) described the section Glaucophyllum
and recognized Pelargonium laevigatum (L. f.) Willd. as
one of the species in the section. Van der Walt et al. (1990)
altered the composition of the section Glaucophyllum but
concluded that P. laevigatum should remain in the section.
P. laevigatum is a variable species and Schonken
(1980) suggested that three subspecies should be distin-
guished. For this study the macromorphology, leaf anat-
omy, chromosome numbers and geographical distribution
of the species have been studied to determine whether it
is justified to recognize infraspecific taxa.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
For the morphological and geographical distribution
studies, specimens of altogether 17 herbaria were studied.
This was followed by extensive field work on different
populations in the entire distribution area, mainly to de-
termine the variation in morphological features.
Transverse sections, 12-15 pm thick, of wax-embed-
ded terminal leaflets and petioles were cut with a rotary
microtome and stained with Alcian Green-Safranin (Joel
1983). The sections were made through the middle part
of the terminal leaflets and petioles.
Specimens examined for leaf anatomy and chromosome
numbers
1. Subsp. laevigatum : Maggs 16, Willowmore 3502+; Van der Walt
734 , 2n = 22, Swartberg Pass, Oudtshoom 1444+; Van der Walt 1594,
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001.
**Department of Botany, University of Stellenbosch Stellenbosch 7600.
MS. received: 1994-05-1 1.
+ project locality no.
Rooiberg Pass, Calitzdorp 4093+; 2n = 22, Schonken 150, Swartberg
Pass 2014+.
2. Subsp. diversifolium : Van der Walt 1592, Tweedside, Matjiesfon-
tein 405 1+; Van der Walt 1063, 2n = 22; Gydouw, Ceres 4132+.
3. Subsp. oxyphyllum : Van der Walt 1604, 2n = 22, Cedarberg 4133+;
Stirton 6401, Wupperthal 1085+.
For mitosis, root tips were treated with 0.002 mol 8-
hydroxiquinoline for 24 h at 20°C, fixed in 3:1 absolute
ethanol and glacial acid, and stained with aceto-cannine.
RESULTS
Pelargonium laevigatum (L. f) Willd., Species
plantarum 3,1: 685 (1800); Knuth: 436 (1912). Type:
‘Cap. Bonae Spei’, Thunberg s.n. ( UPS 15620, lecto.!,
here designated).
Erect and compact or prostrate and lax subshrub, much
branched, evergreen, 0.3-0.5 (-lm) high and 0. 3-0.5 m
in diameter. Stems smooth, herbaceous, glabrous or
glabrescent, grey or glaucous. Leaves unifoliolate to tri-
foliolate, articulated to petiole, subsucculent, glabrous or
pilose to hirsute, with sparse glandular hairs, glaucous;
pinnae sessile, lanceolate to terete, bases cuneate, apices
acute, margins entire or irregularly dentate to incised with
linear segments, pinnae (10-)20-40(-70) x 1-10 mm;
petiole (4—) 15-20(^40) mm long; stipules free, subulate,
3-11 x 0. 2-1.0 mm, somewhat succulent, glabrous to pi-
lose. Inflorescence : flowers borne singly or in reduced
pseudo-umbels of 2-5 flowers each, peduncle (6-)30-50
(-100) mm long, glabrous to pilose. Pedicel 0.5-13 mm
long, glabrous or with glandular hairs. Hypanthium 4-38
mm long, glabrous or with glandular hairs. Sepals 5, nar-
rowly ovate, adaxially concave, apices acute, glabrous or
pilose to hirsute, green to reddish brown with hyaline mar-
gins, 6-12 x 1.5-3. 5 mm. Petals 5, white or cream-col-
oured or pink; posterior 2 spathulate with apices obtuse
134
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
or rounded or retuse, 1 1-30 x 4—9 mm, reflexed at ± 90°
from the middle, with reddish purple markings at base; an-
terior 3 spathulate to narrowly obovate with apices obtuse
or rounded or retuse, somewhat smaller (11-20 x 3-6 mm)
and somewhat lighter in colour than posterior petals, gradu-
ally recurved so that apices are at an angle of ± 90° with
bases, with fine purplish lines near bases. Stamens : fertile 7
(4 long, 1 medium, 2 short), staminodes 3, filaments basally
fused forming a staminal column 2-3 mm long; pollen yel-
low to orange. Ovary ovate, 5-lobed, pilose; style glabrous
or sparsely pilose basally, 1^4 mm long; stigmas 5, purplish,
1-2 mm long. Mericarps: 20-30 mm long; bases 3.5-6.0
mm long, tails 16-24 mm long. 2n = 22.
Key to subspecies
la Leaves trifoliolate, pinnae incised, southern Cape to E Cape
1. subsp. laevigatum
lb Leaves unifoliolate or trifoliolate, pinnae not incised, SW Cape
to southern Cape:
2a Leaves, glabrous, trifoliolate, flowers usually bome singly, re-
stricted to Cedarberg Mountains 3. subsp. oxyphyllum
2b Leaves hirsute, unifoliolate to trifoliolate, usually more than 1
flower per pseudo-umbel, Western Cape
2. subsp. diversifolium
1. subsp. laevigatum
Pelargonium laevigatum (L. f.) Willd., Species plantarum 3,1: 685
(1800); Pers.: 233 (1806); DC.: 667 (1824); Drege: 122 (1843); Harv.:
297 (1860); Compton: 295 (1931); Clifford: 218 (1970); Van der Walt
& Vorster: 87 (1981). Type: as for P. laevigatum (L. f.) Willd.
Geranium laevigatum L. f.: 306 (1781); L.: 619 (1784); Cav.: 255
(1787); Thunb.: 115 (1794); Thunb.: 522 (1823). Eumorpha laevigata
(L. f.) Eckl. & Zeyh.: 78 (1834-1837).
G. acuminatum Thunb.: 526 (1823). Pelargonium acuminatum
(Thunb.) DC.: 680 (1824); R. Knuth: 542 (1912). Type: locality and
collector unknown, specimen UPS 15555 with Thunberg’s handwriting
(lecto.!, here designated).
P. laevigatum (L. f.) Willd. var. compositum L'Her. ex DC.: 667
(1824). Type: locality and collector unknown, specimen G-DC 667-190
with De Candolle’s handwriting (holo.!).
P. macowanii Bolus: 157 (1890). Type: Cape Province, Boschberg
near Somerset East, MacOwan 1647 (BOL, holo.!; GRA, K!, SAM!, Z!).
Diagnostic morphological features
Leaves trifoliolate, pinnae variously incised, glabrous
to sparsely hirsute, flattened, 1-5 flowers per pseudo-um-
bel (Figure 1).
I IGURE 1 . — P. laevigatum subsp. lae-
vigatum, Ward-Hilhorst 185. A,
flowering branch, x 0.7; B, pet-
als, x 1 ; C, androecium, x 2; D,
gynoecium, x 2.
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
135
FIGURE 2. — Transverse section of petiole of P. laevigatum. A, subsp.
laevigatum, Maggs 16: B, subsp. diversifolium, Van der Walt
1603: C, subsp. oxyphyllum. Van der Walt 1604.
Diagnostic anatomical features of leaves
Petiole : cordiform in transverse section, glandular hairs
multicellular, non-glandular hairs unicellular, hypodermis
not clearly differentiated, parenchymatous cortex 4-6 lay-
ers, extraxylary sclerenchyma cylinder continuous and
2-4 layers wide, main vascular bundles 4, smaller bundles
2-6, medullary bundle usually lacking (Figure 2A). Lam-
ina: V-shaped to more or less flattened in transverse sec-
tion, trichomes as on petiole, stomata evenly distributed
in ad- and abaxial epidermis, mesophyll not clearly dif-
ferentiated in palisade and spongy parenchyma, 2 adaxial
palisade layers larger than 1 abaxial layer (Figure 3A).
Specimens examined
EASTERN CAPE. — 3225 (Somerset East): Boschberg, (-DC), Mac-
Owan 1479 (SAM), 1647 (BOL, GRA. K, MEL, SAM. Z). 3323 (Willow-
more): Slypsteenberg, (-AC), Esterhuysen 6278 (BOL); near Willowmore,
(-AD), Maggs 16 (STEU); Buispoort, (-AD), Theron 1011 (PRE);
Baviaanskloof, (-BC), Van Wyk 384 (STE); 37 km E of Willowmore, (-DA),
Olivier 1643 (STEU); between Miskraal and Smitskraal, (-DA). Hugo 1451
(STE); Studtis, (-DB), Martson 53, 67 (STE); 15 km W of Joubertina,
(-DC), Van der Walt 856 (STEU); Joubertina, (-DD), Esterhuysen s.n.
(BOL), Fourcade 3217 (BOL), Horn s.n. (PRE); near Joubertina, (-DD),
Esterhuysen 7040, 22797 (BOL). 3324 (Steytlerville): Langkloof, (-AB),
Ecldon & Zeyher609 (SAM); Kouga Hills, (-CA), Esterhuysen 6661 (BOL,
PRE); Kouga Mountains, (-CA), Bayliss 6382 (MO. NBG. WAG); Kouga,
(-CA), Compton 10525 (BOL, NBG); between Cambria and Smitskraal,
(-CB), Oliver 4551 (STE); Kareedouw, (-CD), Compton 4516 (BOL); Mor-
denaarskloof, (-CD), Stayner s.n. (NBG); Baviaanskloof, (-DA), Bayliss
4423 (MO); NW of Cambria, Baviaanskloof, (-DA), Oliver 4535 (PRE.
STE). 3325 (Port Elizabeth): Otterford Forest Reserve, (-CC). Oliver 4443
(PRE). Rodin 1109 (BOL, MO, PRE). 3424 (Humansdorp): Krommerivier
Heights, (-BA), Fourcade 2704 (BOL, PRE, STE).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3321 (Ladismith): Rooiberg, (-DA), Compton
3917 (BOL, NBG), Esterhuysen 17144 (BOL), Oliver 5330 (PRE, STE),
Schonken 150 (STEU), Taylor 9796 (STE). Van der Walt 1594 (STEU);
Gamka Mountain Reserve, (-DB), Boshojf 360 (STE). 3322 (Oudts-
hoom): Baviaanskloof. (-AC), Bayliss 4423 (NBG), Boucher 38 (STEU),
Gill 19 (BOL, PRE); Swartberg Pass, (-AC), Bolus 11739 (BOL, PRE).
Compton 10419 (NBG), Hafstrom & Acocks 753 (BOL, PRE), Moffett
696 (STEU), Pocock 120 (PRE), Schonken 150. 189. 190 (STEU), Stokoe
s.n. (SAM), Thompson 2195 (PRE, STE) Van der Walt 734, 1148, 1589
(STEU); Kamanassie Mountains, (-DA/DB), Zinn s.n. (SAM). 3323
(Willowmore): 13 km W of Uniondale, (-CA), Wells 2835 (GRA. PRE);
Bo-Koega, (-CB), Bayliss 7081 (MO); Kouga Mountains, (-CB). Wisura
2173 (NBG); Prince Alfred Pass, (-CC), Fourcade 2091 (BOL).
Subsp. laevigatum occurs in the southern and eastern
Cape, and it is known from Rooiberg near Calitzdorp, east-
wards to Otterford Forest Reserve near Port Elizabeth (Figure
4). It has been collected from 180 m above sea level near
Humansdorp to 1 600 m in the Swartberg Range. The rainfall
in its distribution area varies from 200-600 mm per annum.
Subsp. laevigatum is morphologically very variable but
a continuous variation pattern makes it impossible to di-
vide it into different taxa. Varying characters are the
number of flowers per pseudo-umbel and the size of the
petals, as well as the indumentum and degree of incision
of the leaf margins. To complicate matters, there seem to
be natural hybrids between subsp. laevigatum and Pelar-
gonium fruticosum (Cav.) Willd. P. laevigatum depicted
in Van der Walt & Vorster (1981) with greenish leaves is
most probably an example of such a hybrid. These sus-
pected hybrids occur in the Swartberg Pass where subsp.
laevigatum and P. fruticosum are common.
The plants occurring at Boschberg near Somerset East
have finely divided leaves superficially resembling those
of P. fruticosum. This form was described by Bolus (1890)
as P. macowanii and quoted by Knuth (1912) as P. divari-
cation (Thunb.) DC. var. scabrum Harv. However, the
glaucous leaves and floral characters of these plants are
typical of P. laevigatum and we concluded that they rep-
resent a form of subsp. laevigatum. The atypical leaves
are probably the result of the local environmental condi-
tions and geographical isolation.
Some plants growing in Long Kloof (Fourcade 2704)
and in the Otterford Forest Reserve ( Wilman 1109 ) have
up to five flowers per pseudo-umbel and the petals are
exceptionally large. The pinnae of these plants are also
relatively wide.
136
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
FIGURE 3. — Transverse sections of terminal leaflets of P. laevigatum. A, subsp. laevigatum , Maggs 16; B, subsp. diversifolium. Van der Walt 1603.
C, D, subsp. oxyphyllum : C, flattened leaf. Van der Walt 1501; D, centric leaf. Van der Walt 1604.
FIGURE 4. — Known geographical distribution of/5, laevigatum: subsp. laevigatum, •; subsp. diversifolium, ■; subsp. oxyphyllum, ▲.
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
137
2. subsp. diversifolium (Wendl.) Schonken stat. nov.
Pelargonium diversifolium Wendl., Botanische Beobachtungen: 52
(1798); Willd.: 664 (1800); Pers.: 230 (1806); Wendl.: 53 (1809). Icono-
type: Wendland, Collectio plantarum 2,4: t. 58 (1809).
Geranium trifoliatum Andr.: (1805). Pelargonium trifoliatum (Andr.)
Sweet: 294 (1826). Iconotype: Andrews, Geraniums c. ic. (1805).
Diagnostic morphological features
Leaves unifoliolate to trifoliolate, pinnae not incised,
hirsute to densely hirsute, flattened, 1-2 flowers per
pseudo-umbel (Figure 5).
Diagnostic anatomical features of leaves
Petiole : adaxially flattened, glandular hairs multicellular,
non-glandular hairs unicellular, hypodermis clearly differen-
tiated, parenchymatous cortex 5-6 layers, extraxylary
sclerenchyma cylinder continuous and 2-6 layers wide,
main vascular bundles 4, smaller bundles 4—8, medullary
bundle 1 or 0 (Figure 2B ). Lamina : flattened, trichomes as
on petiole, more stomata abaxially, mesophyll differentiated
in palisade and spongy parenchyma, 2 adaxial palisade layers
larger than 1 abaxial layer (Figure 3B).
Specimens examined
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): Agter-Witzenberg, (-AB),
Marais 47 (STEU); Elandsfontein, Skurweberge, (-AB), Schlechter 1750
(PRE), 10020 (BOL, E, MO, P, PRE, W, Z); 11 km N of Gydouw Pass,
(-AB), Hutchinson 1040 (BOL), Van der Walt 1603 (STEU); Farm Me-
rino, Theronsberg, (-AD), Cillie 686 (STEU); Baviaansberg, Ceres,
(-BA), Compton 12850 (NBG), Stokoe s.n. (SAM); Ertjieslandkloof, Ce-
res, (-BA), Wilman 2266 (BOL, MO); Hottentotskloof, (-BC), Pearson
4945 (BOL); Bokkerivier farms, Ceres, (-BD), Barker 10144 (NBG),
Booysen 60 (NBG); between Concordia and Triangle, (-BD). Barnard
754 (SAM); Bonteberg, Worcester, (-BD), Compton 9936 (NBG),
Esterhuysen 3712 (BOL); Eendracht, (-DB), Lewis 1777 (SAM). 3320
FIGURE 5. — P. laevigatum subsp. di-
versifolium, Ward-Hilhorst
111. A, flowering branch, x 0.8;
B, petals, x 1.6; C, androecium,
x 3.2; D, gynoecium x 3.2.
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
138
FIGURE 6. — P. laevigatum
subsp. oxyphyllum. Ward-
Hilhorst 210. A, flower-
ing branch, x 0.7; B, pet-
als, x 1 ; C, androecium, x
3; D, gynoecium, x 3.
(Montagu): Tweedside, (-AB), Barker 20602 (BOL), Marloth 10848,
12096 (PRE, STE), Van der Walt 1592 (STEU); Cabidu, (-AB). Hall
171 (NBG), Oliver s.n. (NBG); Pieter Meintjies, (-AD), Rogers 17887
(PRE); Witteberg, (-AD/BC), Adamson s.n. (BOL), Compton 2680
(BOL), 12213 (NBG); Matjiesfontein, (-BA), Marloth 2961 (BOL,
PRE); Whitehall, (-BA), Compton 7957 (NBG), Fisantekraal, (-BC),
Compton 21 1 10 (NBG). 3321 (Ladisniith): Elandskloof between Vleiland
and Seweweekspoort, (-AD), Maggs 28 (STEU); Ladismith, (-BD),
Geldenhuys 454 (STE); Rietkloof, (-BD), Lewis 1168 (SAM). 3322
(Oudtshoom): Robinson Pass, (-CC), Taylor s.n. (BOL).
Subsp. diversifolium occurs from Gydouw near Ceres
eastwards to the Robinson Pass between Oudtshoom and
Mossel Bay (Figure 4). It is often found in mountainous
habitats in a variety of vegetation types. Its distribution
area falls entirely in the winter rainfall region, but it usu-
ally occurs on the lower slopes of mountains or on hills
where the rainfall is relatively low in comparison to habi-
tats higher up on the mountains.
3. subsp. oxyphyllum (DC.) Schonken stat. nov.
Pelargonium oxyphyllum DC., Prodromus systematis naturalis regni
vegetabilis I: 667 (1824); Drege: 209 (1843). Type: locality and collector
unknown, specimen C-DC 667-190 with De Candolle’s handwriting
(holo. !).
P. laevigatum (L. f.) Willd. var. oxyphyllum (DC.) Harv.: 297 (1860).
Diagnostic morphological features
Leaves trifoliolate, pinnae not incised, glabrous, sub-
terete to flattened, usually 1 flower per pseudo-umbel
(Figure 6).
Diagnostic anatomical features of leaves
Petiole : adaxially flattened to cordiform, without
trichomes, hypodermis not clearly differentiated, paren-
chyma cortex 5-6 cell layers, extraxylary sclerenchyma
cylinder continuous and 2-5 layers wide, main vascular
bundles 4, smaller bundles 6-8, medullary bundle 1 or 0
(Figure 2C). Lamina : more or less flattened to centric,
more stomata abaxially, mesophyll differentiated in pali-
sade and spongy parenchyma, 1 adaxial palisade layer
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
139
larger than 2 abaxial layers, mesophyll in centric leaves
not clearly differentiated (Figure 3C, D).
Specimens examined
WESTERN CAPE. — 3219 (Wupperthal): Heuningvlei, Wupperthal
road, (-AA), Schonken 86 (STEU); Middelberg, (-AA/AC), Compton
7503 (NBG); Kerfoot 6150 (NBG); Sneeukop road. (-AC), Strauss 63
(NBG); between Algeria and Dwarsrivier, (-AC), Schonken 81 (STEU);
Hoogvertoon, (-AC), Haynes 1205 (PRE, STE); Cedarberg, (-AC), Van
der Walt 1604 (STEU); Matjesrivier, (-AC), Wagener 281 (NBG);
Dwarsrivier, (-AC), Rycroft 2641 (MO, NBG, STE); Tafelberg, (-AC),
Barnard s.n. (SAM), Lamb 1 (STE); between Eselbank and Wupperthal,
(-AC), Van der Walt 1501. 1502 (STEU); Eselbank, (-AC), Drege s.n.
(MEL, PRE); Wupperthal, (-AC), Stirton 6401 (PRE, STEU), Thode
A1965 (NH, PRE); Gideonskop, (-CB), Stokoe s.n. (NBG); Juriesberg,
(-CB), Compton 12742 (NBG); Zoo Ridge, Suurvlakte, (-CD), Taylor
6120 (PRE, STE); Skurweberge E of Citrusdal, (-CD), Prismos s.n.
(SAM).
Subsp. oxyphyllum is confined to the Cedarberg Range,
occurring from Heuningvlei in the vicinity of Wupperthal
southwards to the district of Citrusdal (Figure 4). It grows
in flat areas on deep sandy soil derived from sandstone.
The annual rainfall in its distribution area varies from
200-500 mm.
DISCUSSION
P laevigatum is taxonomically a complicated species
because it displays a high degree of phenoplasticity. Al-
most all the populations studied have unique combinations
of characters. The floral structure and many leaf characters
of the plants investigated are, however, basically identical
and therefore it was decided to consider them as conspe-
cific. The three subspecies which are distinguished, have
the same somatic chromosome number of 2n = 22. The
rank of subspecies rather than variety was chosen for the
three infraspecific taxa because they are allopatric.
The phenoplasticity of the species is also reflected in the
leaf anatomy. The leaflets of subsp. oxyphyllum for example
vary from flattened to centric. A medullary vascular bundle
can be present or absent in the petioles of all three subspecies,
even in different leaves of the same plant. The occurrence
of hairs on the leaves of subsp. laevigatum is also extremely
variable. Anatomical features of the leaves of P. laevigatum
are therefore of limited taxonomic importance.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are indebted to Prof. Dr Focke Albers for assisting
us to determine the chromosome numbers and the Bren-
thurst Library (copyright) for permission to reproduce the
water-colour paintings by Ellaphie Ward-Hilhorst.
REFERENCES
ANDREWS, H.C. 1805. Geraniums: ora monograph of the genus Gera-
nium, Vol. 2. Taylor, London.
BOLUS, H. 1890. Contributions to South African botany. Journal of the
Linnean Society, Botany 25: 157.
CAVANILLES, A.J. 1787. Monadelphiae classis dissertationes decern.
Quarta dissertatio botanica, de Geranio, F.A. Didot, Paris.
CLIFFORD, D. 1970. Pelargoniums including the popular Geranium.
edn 2. Blandford Press, London.
COMPTON, R.H. 1931. The flora of the Whitehill District. Transactions
of the Royal Society of South Africa 19: 295.
DE CANDOLLE, A.L.L.P. 1824. Prodromus systematis naturalis regni
vegetabilis. Treutel & Wiirtz, Paris.
DREGE, J.F. 1843. Zwei pflanzengeographische Documente nebst einer
Einleitung von E. Meyer. Jena & Leipzig.
ECKLON, C.F. & ZEYHER, K.L.P. 1834—1837. Enumeratio plantarum
africae australis extratropicae. Perthes, Flamburgii.
HARVEY, W.H. 1860. Geraniaceae. Flora capensis 1: 254-308.
JOEL, D.M. 1983. A.G.S. (Alcian Green-Safranin) — a simple differential
staining of plant material for light microscopy. Proceedings of the
Royal Microscopy Society 18/3: 1 49-15 1 .
KNUTH, R.G.P. 1912. Geraniaceae. Das Pflanzenreich 4. 129 (Heft 53).
Wilhelm Engelmann. Berlin.
LINNAEUS, C. (fil.) 1781. Supplementum plantarum. Impensis or-
phanotrophei, Braunschweig.
LINNAEUS, C. 1784. Systema vegetabilium , 4th edn. Gottingen.
PERSOON, C.H. 1806. Synopsis plantarum 2, Cotta, Tubingen.
SCHONKEN, C.M. 1980. 'n Morfologiese en taksonomiese studie van
die seksie Glaucophyllum van Pelargonium. M.Sc. thesis. Univer-
sity of Stellenbosch.
SWEET. R. 1826. Geraniaceae, Vol. 3: 294. James Ridgway, London.
THUNBERG, C.P. 1794. Prodromus plantarum capensium. Part 1. Ed-
man, Uppsala.
THUNBERG, C.P. 1823. Flora capensis, edn 3. Stuttgart.
VAN DER WALT, J.J.A., ALBERS, F. & GIBBY, M. 1990. Delimitation
of Pelargonium sect. Glaucophyllum (Geraniaceae). Plant Sys-
tematics and Evolution 171: 15-26.
VAN DER WALT, J.J.A. & VORSTER, P.J. 1981. Pelargoniums of
southern Africa, Vol. 2. Juta, Cape Town.
WENDLAND, J.C. 1798. Botanische Beobachtungen. Hannover.
WENDLAND, J.C. 1809. Collectio plantarum. Hannover.
WILLDENOW, C.L. 1800. Caroli a Linne species, 4th edn, Vol. 3. Nauk,
Berlin.
Bothalia 25,2: 141-148 (1995)
A systematic study of the genus Pseudopentameris (Arundinoideae: Poaceae)
N.P. BARKER*
Keywords: Arundineae, Arundinoideae, conservation, leaf anatomy, phenetics, phylogenetics, Poaceae, Pseudopentameris, systematics
ABSTRACT
The genus Pseudopentameris Conert is examined morphologically and anatomically. A phenetic study of the morphologi-
cally variable species P. macrantha indicates that two taxa should be recognised. One of these, P. caespitosa N.P. Barker, is
described as new. In addition, the study supports the inclusion of Pentameris obtusifolia in Pseudopentameris. The genus
Pseudopentameris is re-delimited to accommodate the new taxa, and a key to species is provided. Details of the cytology,
phylogeny and conservation status of taxa in the genus are also discussed.
UITTREKSEL
Die genus Pseudopentameris Conert word morfologies en anatomies ondersoek. ’n Fenetiese ondersoek van die varierende
spesie P. macrantha toon dat twee taksons erken moet word. Een van hulle, P. caespitosa N.P. Barker, word as nuut beskryf.
Verder ondersteun die ondersoek die insluiting van Pentameris obtusifolia in Pseudopentameris. Die genus Pseudopentameris
word heromgrens om die nuwe taksons te huisves, en ’n sleutel tot die spesies word verskaf. Besonderhede van die sitologie,
filogenie en bewaringstatus van taksons in die genus word ook bespreek.
INTRODUCTION
The genus Pseudopentameris Conert is endemic to the
lowland fynbos of the southwestern Cape Province, South
Africa. This genus was created by Conert (1971), who
thought that two species of the genus Danthonia DC., D.
macrantha Schrad. and D. brachyphylla Stapf, merited
recognition as a separate genus. This new genus was char-
acterised by unusually large spikelets which, while similar
to both those of Pentameris P Beauv. and Danthonia , dif-
fered in having many-nerved glumes. The nature of the
fruit of these two species also set them apart.
Studies of the leaf anatomy (discussed below) provided
further evidence of their singularity (De Wet 1956, 1960;
Ellis 1985a). Ellis (1985b) observed that the leaf anatomy
of the taxon he called Pentameris sp. nov., bore a strong
resemblance to the anatomy of the two known species of
Pseudopentameris, and postulated a hybrid origin for this
species. Additional studies on the fruit morphology
(Barker 1986, 1989, 1993) and leaf anatomy (presented
below) also suggested that this unusual species has close
affinities with the other species of Pseudopentameris. Be-
cause of the nomenclatural confusion surrounding this
taxon (see 1. Pseudopentameris obtusifolia below), past
studies have referred to it by a number of names. Barker
(1989) and Ellis (1985b) referred to it as Pentameris sp.
nov. whereas Linder & Ellis (1990) refer to it as Pen-
tameris squarrosa Stapf. Some herbaria (in particular PRE
and STE) misapplied this name to the taxon now known
as Pentameris oerophila N.P. Barker (1993), whereas BOL
has used the synonym Pentameris squarrosa Stapf.
* Department of Botany, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, Ronde-
bosch 7700. Present address: Department of Botany, University of the
Western Cape, Private Bag XI 7, Bellville 7535.
Email: nigel@botany.uwc.ac.za
MS. received: 1994-09-27.
This study encapsulates all these observations, and
documents the anatomical and morphological variation
within the genus, and presents the relevant nomenclatural
modifications that are required as a result of these obser-
vations.
MORPHOLOGY
Pseudopentameris is unusual in having two species ( P.
macrantha and P. obtusifolia) with aerial stems that pos-
sess the anatomy of a rhizome (H.P. Linder unpublished).
Until the anatomy and homology of these structures is
better understood, the term ‘stem’ is used, as it serves to
differentiate this structure from below-ground rhizomes
and the annually produced flowering culm.
These stems are often branched, and the annual flow-
ering culms are produced from their apical buds. Sub-
sequent shoot growth takes place from what Linder &
Ellis (1990) term caulescent innovation buds on the stems,
which results in branched stems. This branching can lead
to a shrub-like growth form in older plants. This type of
growth form has also been described in some species of
Pentameris (Barker 1993). In Pseudopentameris obtusifo-
lia these branched aerial stems are scandent, spreading
out from the base of the plant, over and between the other
vegetation. Linder & Ellis (1990) illustrate this species
(named in their work as P. squarrosa) and consider its
unusual growth form to be an adaptation enabling the
plant to survive long interfire periods that are charac-
teristic of the fynbos biome. The two species which do
not have these stems (P. brachyphylla and P. caespitosa
sp. nov. described below) produce the annual flowering
culm from an underground rhizome that can become fi-
brous or woody in older plants.
In P. obtusifolia the stems are covered by the persistent
remains of the leaf sheaths, the dead leaf blades being
142
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
FIGURE 1. — First two axes of Princi-
pal Components Analysis
(PCA) of 59 specimens match-
ing the previous description of
Pseudopentameris macrantha.
Specimens measured for six
floral characters. First axis:
81.7% of variation present in
data. Second axis: 6.8%. Lines
drawn around two groups were
placed by eye. Each symbol
represents an individual speci-
men. Specimens with rhi-
zomatous growth form, P.
macrantha, O', specimens with
caespitose growth form, P.
caespitosa. A; specimens with
no recorded growth form, ★.
deciduous. In the other species in the genus, the dead leaf
blades are persistent, and in P brachyphylla (Stapf) Conert
they curl in a characteristic manner at the base of the
plant. The living leaf blades are short, open to rolled and
rigid in P. obtusifolia, but long, somewhat flexuous and
open to rolled in the other species.
The inflorescence is a contracted panicle, which be-
comes somewhat lax during anthesis and comprises 8-80
spikelets. Spikelet size is variable between the species.
The glumes are 3-nerved in P. obtusifolia (the lateral veins
are visible only at the base of the glumes) and 5-9-nerved
in the other species. The lemmas are variously pubescent,
with a geniculate central awn. The lemma lobes are acu-
minate and variously adnate to the lateral bristle. The
palea is bicarinate, bifid at the apex and longer than the
lemma body. The lodicules are many-nerved (G.A. Ver-
boom unpublished data), cuneate, glabrous or ciliolate.
The latter condition is developed to the extreme in P. ob-
tusifolia, which has densely ciliolate lodicules, the cilia
being as long as the lodicule bodies.
Each floret has three large anthers (up to 9 mm). The
ovaries of all taxa possess what Barker (1990, 1994)
termed pseudostigmata. These structures have the appear-
ance of stigmatic hairs, and arise from the region between
the points of origin of the style branches, although the
style branches themselves appear to be absent (or alter-
natively have stigmata along their entire length, from the
apex of the ovary upwards). As the pseudostigmata are
easily deciduous, they are seldom observed on mature
fruit. Their presence may, however, explain the references
by De Wet (1954b) and Tomlinson (1985) to hairs which
are decurrent on the inner side of the caryopsis and join
over the top of the ovary. A similar description of these
structures is given by Chippindall (1955). These features,
although not labelled as pseudostigmata, appear in the fig-
ures published by Barker (1986, 1990). The fruit is a cary-
opsis (Clayton & Renvoize 1986), up to 6 mm long, with
a long, canaliculate hilum extending almost the full length
of the fruit. The embryo is a quarter to a fifth the length
of the fruit (Conert 1971; Barker 1986, 1989, 1990). The
surface of the caryopsis is reticulate (Barker 1986, 1989).
Barker (1990) noted substantial variation in the size of
the floral parts in specimens identified as P. macrantha.
This prompted an additional study in which measurements
of six floral characters from 59 specimens were taken,
including those examined in the earlier study. The
phenetic package NTSYS-pc version 1.4 (Numerical Tax-
onomy and SYStematics package; Rohlf 1988) was used
to perform a Principal Components Analysis (PCA).
The first three principal components (axes) account for
92.9% of the variation in the data. When the specimens
are plotted out on the first two axes (accounting for 88.5%
of the variation), two clusters are apparent (Figure 1).
Each cluster contains specimens from a wide geographic
area, and the geographic areas of the two clusters overlap
extensively. Furthermore, specimens from each cluster
have been observed to co-occur. Despite this sympatric
distribution, a one-sided T-test showed that the differences
in the means of each of the six characters from the two
clusters were statistically significant at a 99.9% confi-
dence interval. Table 1 presents the sample means and
standard deviations of these characters in each cluster.
TABLE 1. — Sample means and standard deviations (mm) for six quan-
titative floral characters of two clusters of specimens correspond-
ing to P. macrantha and P. caespitosa. A one-sided T-test shows
that differences between means for all characters are significant
at 99.9% confidence interval
P. macrantha P. caespitosa
Mean Std. dev. Mean Std. dev.
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
143
A character not included in the PCA, but overlaid onto
the PCA plot, is that of growth form, as related to the
presence of the branching stems. This feature was ob-
served in the field for some of the specimens included in
the PCA, and the position in the PCA plot of these speci-
mens is shown in Figure I by means of open symbols.
As can be seen from Figure 1, each cluster has a specific
growth form. The cluster with the smaller floral parts in-
cludes specimens with branching stems, whereas the
specimens with larger floral parts do not possess stems.
These two clusters are considered here to be two species:
P. macrantha and P. caespitosa N.P. Barker sp. nov. De-
scriptions and details on nomenclature of these two spe-
cies appear below.
LEAF ANATOMY
Pseudopentameris has been well examined anatomi-
cally by De Wet (1956, 1960), Renvoize (1981), Ellis
(1985a), Tomlinson (1985) and Barker (1990). The genus
as a whole possesses a sclerophyllous type of arundinoid
leaf anatomy (Ellis & Linder 1992). Ellis (1985a) found
minor anatomical differences between P. macrantha and
P. brachyphylla. The anatomy of P obtusifolia is only
slightly different from the former two species (Ellis
1985b). All the taxa share characters such as the presence
of large, inflated abaxial epidermal cells, dumbbell-shaped
silica bodies and the absence of abaxial micro- and macro-
hairs. This knowledge was supplemented in this study by
a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) survey of the leaf
epidermides of all the species in the genus.
The SEM study of both adaxial and abaxial leaf anat-
omy was carried out on leaf blade material of nine her-
barium specimens of P. macrantha , nine specimens of P.
caespitosa, five specimens of P. brachyphylla and 1 1
specimens of P. obtusifolia. Leaf material was mounted
on SEM stubs and then coated in gold-palladium. The
specimens were examined using an ISI-SX-25 Scanning
Electron Microscope.
The abaxial epidermis of all specimens examined
lacked both microhairs and macrohairs and, as noted by
Ellis (1985a), the abaxial epidermides of all the species
are almost indistinguishable. However, occasional needle-
like prickles were observed. Figure 2A illustrates the
abaxial epidermis of P. obtusifolia.
The adaxial epidermides of P. macrantha, P. caespitosa
and P. brachyphylla were almost identical (Figure 2B, C),
but the epidermis of P. obtusifolia differed, in that it had
a denser distribution of prickles (Figure 2D). In all the
FIGURE 2. — Leaf blade SEM of Pseudopentameris. A, D. P. obtusifolia, Ellis 2342: A, abaxial epidermis showing large inflated epidermal
cells and small prickles; D, deeply ribbed adaxial epidermis heavily adorned with prickles. B, P. brachyphylla, Boucher 357a,
adaxial epidermis showing open furrows and ribs with prickles. C, E, P. macrantha, Ellis 2515: C, adaxial prickles, note also
dumbbell-shaped silica bodies; E, microhair from adaxial epidermis, note minute apical cell. Scale bars: A, 225 gm; B. 240 pm;
C, 1 15 gm; D, 325 gm; E, 17 gm.
144
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
species, the prickles are needle-like and angled almost par-
allel to the epidermis. These prickles appear to be modi-
fications of the epidermal cell surface (shown magnified
in Figure 2C). These prickles are unlike those found in
Pentameris (Barker 1993), Pentaschistis (Ellis & Linder
1992) and at least one species of Merxmuellera (Barker
& Ellis 1991). The prickles of these latter taxa are slightly
inflated basally, variable in length but longer than in
Pseudopentameris , and protrude away from the epidermis.
Microhairs with minute, deflated apical cells were ob-
served at the bottom of the adaxial furrows (Figure 2E).
These bicellular microhairs are similar, except in size, to
those reported in Pentameris (Barker 1993). Microhair
size ranged from 55-67 pm, with a mean of 64.8 pm (five
samples), and (unlike in Pentameris) no species level size
differences were apparent. No microhairs were observed
on the abaxial leaf surface.
The presence, distribution and nature of microhairs in
this genus has been a contentious issue. De Wet (1956,
1960) implies that, as Pseudopentameris has a panicoid
epidermis, bicellular hairs (microhairs) would be present,
presumably on the abaxial surface. In contrast, Renvoize
(1981) considered microhairs to be absent, but later he
described ‘long slender papillae, which in a few instances
appear to bear the remains of a thin-walled apical cell’
which were associated with the adaxial surface (Renvoize
1986). This description matches the structure shown in
Figure 2E, and it appears that these papillae are in fact
microhairs.
CYTOLOGY
The cytology of the genus Danthonia was examined
by De Wet (1953, 1954a, b), who was of the opinion that
the base chromosome number of this group is x = 6. The
subsequent division of the genus Danthonia resulted in
limited cytological knowledge for each of the segregate
genera. Additional research by Spies & Du Plessis (1988)
and Du Plessis & Spies (1988) has increased cytological
knowledge about the Danthonia segregates but no chro-
mosome counts of the species of Pseudopentameris have
been published. From analyses of the relationship between
stomatal size and chromosome counts, De Wet (1954a)
predicted a count of 2n = 24. This figure is credible, as
many of the African arundinoid genera display intraspe-
cific polyploidy (see the study on Cliaetobromus by Spies
et al. 1990).
CONSERVATION STATUS
Two species in the genus are mentioned in local con-
servation texts. Pseudopentameris obtusifolia (under the
name of Pentameris obtusifolia) is listed by Hall et al.
(1980) as a threatened species, the conservation status of
which is given as ‘uncertain’. However, owing to the no-
menclatural difficulties experienced with this taxon (dis-
cussed below and in Barker 1993) and the lack of voucher
citations, the exact identity of this taxon is not certain.
Pseudopentameris brachyphylla is considered by Bond &
Goldblatt (1984) to be rare, as it is restricted to the Cale-
don area. Both these species are restricted to relatively
small areas at a low to mid altitude. Therefore, although
not presently under threat, their narrow habitat range
places them in a category that may best be described as
‘potentially threatened’.
PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS
The genus Pseudopentameris now contains four spe-
cies. These species are united by an unusual fruit mor-
phology and the presence of pseudostigmata (described
above). This fruit morphology is rare in the southern Af-
rican Arundineae. The only other arundinoid taxon with
a similar fruit type is Cliaetobromus Nees, the fruit of
which are somewhat smaller, but similar in all other re-
spects except the possession of pseudostigmata (Barker
1994). The close relationship between these two genera
is further supported by DNA-based molecular studies
(Barker et al. in prep.). As Pseudopentameris has both
anatomical and morphological autapomorphies (the pres-
ence of inflated abaxial epidermal cells and the presence
of the pseudostigmata on the apex of the ovary) the genus
is distinct from Chaetobromus, and the two genera ought
not to be combined. Autapomorphies for Chaetobromus
include spikelets which disarticulate below the glumes and
dimorphic florets. In Pseudopentameris , and many other
arundinoid genera, the spikelets disarticulate above the
glumes. Chaetobromus is the only arundinoid genus which
has dimorphic florets: the basal ones are glabrous, the up-
per ones variously hirsute.
Affinities between Pseudopentameris and other 2-flow-
ered arundinoids, Pentameris and Pentaschistis, have also
been postulated (e.g. Ellis 1985b; Ellis & Linder 1992). Pen-
tameris is presently defined by fruit characters (an achene
with an apical crown of hairs; Barker 1993), whereas Pen-
taschistis, as presently defined, has no obvious autapomor-
phy, and may include both Pentameris and Prionanthium
Desv. (H.R Linder pers. comm.). While the presence of 2-
flowered spikelets may indicate some degree of relationship
of Pseudopentameris to these genera, other features such as
the sclerophyllous type of arundinoid leaf anatomy suggest
that these relationships extend beyond these taxa to genera
such as Merxmuellera. The assessment of phylogenetic re-
lationships of Pseudopentameris and other arundinoid taxa
therefore needs to be done in the broadest possible context,
and should include all taxa and not be restricted to the south-
ern African genera. Such a study is presently under way
(H.R Linder et al. in prep.).
TAXONOMY
Pseudopentameris Conert in Mitteilungen der Bo-
tanischen Staatssammlung, Miinchen 10: 304 (1971). Type
species: Pseudopentameris macrantha (Schrad.) Conert.
Plants perennial; caespitose, scandent or sometimes
branched. Stems 0.4—1 ,4(-2) m long, woody and persistent
or herbaceous from woody base; flowering culms up to
0.8 m long. Leaves', sheaths appressed to culm, persistent;
sheath mouth sometimes auriculate; ligule a fringe of
hairs; leaf blades linear, 25-500 mm long, rigid or soft,
open and flat to rolled and rigid. Inflorescence paniculate,
lanceolate and somewhat contracted. Spikelets 6-80, lat-
erally compressed, 2-fiowered, highly reduced third floret
Bothaiia 25,2 (1995)
145
FIGURE 3. — The distribution of
Pseudopentameris spp. in the
southwestern Cape, South Af-
rica. A, P. obtusifolia; B, P.
brachyphylla’, C, P. macran-
tha; D, P. caespitosa.
rarely present; glumes two, more or less equal, 1 8-60 mm
long, 3-7(-9)-nerved, chartaceous, minutely scabrid or
glaucous; lemma body chartaceous to cartilaginous, vari-
ously pubescent. 4.5-11.0 mm long, 7-9-nerved, nerves
anastomosing into awn base and 8-27 mm long lateral
bristle; lemma lobes 1 .5^1.5 mm long, acute to acuminate,
partly to fully adnate to bristles; central awn geniculate,
scabrid, contorted basally, 5-17 mm long from base to
knee. 12-34 mm long from knee to tip; palea longer than
lemma body, bifid at apex. Lodicules two, glabrous,
sparsely to densely ciliolate. Stamens three, 4.5-9.0 mm
long. Ovary glabrous, with apical pseudostigmata, styles
short to absent. Fruit a caryopsis, 4—6 mm long, hilum
% as long as fruit, embryo % as long as fruit, surface
reticulately sculptured.
Key to species
la Lower glumes 18-25 mm long, 3-nerved basally, central nerve
extending the length of glume; lodicules densely ciliolate
1. P. obtusifolia
lb Lower glumes (27— )35 — 60 mm long and (3-)5-9-nerved;
lodicules sparsely ciliolate or glabrous:
2a Lemmas pubescent over entire abaxial surface . .2. P. brachyphylla
2b Lemmas basally glabrous, apically pubescent, including
lemma lobes:
3a Lemma body 5-8 mm long; awn (knee to tip) 1 1-18 mm
long; lemma bristle 9-15 mm long; plants with
branched above-ground stems, especially in older
plants 3. P macrantha
3b Lemma body 8-10 mm long; awn (knee to tip) 17-27
mm long; bristle 15-30 mm long; plants with woody
or fibrous underground base, branched above-ground
stems absent 4. P. caespitosa
1 . Pseudopentameris obtusifolia (Hochst.) N.P. Barker
Danthonia obtusifolia Hochst. in Flora 29: 120 (1846); Stapf: 536
(1899). Pentameris obtusifolia (Hochst.) Schweick.: 91 (1938); N.R
Barker in Gibbs Russell et ah: 252 (1990). Type: Pr. b. spei, Ludwig s.n.
(OXF, iso.(?)!).
Avena rigida Steud.: 482 (1829), non A. rigida M. Bieb. (1808). Dan-
thonia rigida Steud.: 243 (1855). Type: Pr. b. spei, Ludwig s.n. (OXF, holo.!
or iso.!).
Pentameris squarrosa Stapf: 515 (1899); Linder & Ellis; 91-103
(1990). Type: Caledon Div., Nieuw Kloof in Houw Hoek Mountains,
Burchell 8076 (K, holo.; PRE, iso.!).
Pentameris sp. nov., Ellis: 567 (1985b); Barker: 136 (1989).
Plants perennial; scandent, sometimes branched. Stems
branching, 0.4-1. 5(— 3.0) m long, woody and persistent,
flowering culms produced annually from apical growth
points. Leaves : sheaths appressed to culm, persistent;
sheath mouth slightly bearded; leaf blades linear, 25-120
mm long, somewhat rolled and rigid. Inflorescence pani-
culate, lanceolate and contracted. Spikelets 8-45, laterally
compressed, 2-flowered; glumes two, more or less equal,
18-25 mm long, chartaceous, minutely scabrid, 3-nerved
basally, central nerve extending to glume apex; lemma
body uniformly pubescent, 4. 5-6.0 mm long, 9-nerved,
nerves anastomosing into awn base and a 8-12 mm long
lateral bristle; lemma lobes 1. 5-3.0 mm long, acute to
acuminate, partly to fully adnate to bristles; central awn
geniculate, scabrid. contorted basally, 7.5-11.0 mm long
from base to knee, 12-16 mm long from knee to tip; palea
longer than lemma body, bifid at apex. Lodicules two,
densely ciliolate, cilia as long as lodicule body. Stamens
three, 4. 5-7. 5 mm long. Ovary glabrous, with apical
pseudostigmata, styles short to absent. Fruit 4 mm long.
Flowering time November to January. The known distri-
bution of this species is indicated in Figure 3A.
Schweickerdt (1938) points out that Steudel (1829) and
Hochstetter ( 1 846) probably described new taxa from dupli-
cate material collected by Baron von Ludwig. Hochstetter
called his species Danthonia obtusifolia Hochst., whereas
Steudel named the material Avena rigida Steud. Schweick-
erdt showed that the name Avena rigida had been used earlier
by Marschall von Bieberstein (1808) and therefore Steudefs
later homonym is rejected. The Ludwig specimen at OXF
bears the name Avena rigida , and is considered to be the
146
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
holotype or perhaps an isotype of this name. The specimen
seen by Hochstetter was not traced, so the same specimen
(Ludwig specimen at OXF) is considered to be probably
the isotype of the name Danthonia obtusifolia. Hochstetter’s
(1846) D. obtusifolia has priority over Stapf’s (1897) I).
squarrosa. Schweickerdt notes that had Stapf seen the type
material on which Steudel had based his description, he
would have been able to identify his species as Danthonia
obtusifolia Hochst.
The type of Stapf’s Pentameris squarrosa is a Burchell
specimen, Burchell 8076. There is a fragment of this
specimen in PRE, which originates from Kew. The enve-
lope is annotated by Schweickerdt, who wrote 'a fair
match of the type of Avena rigida Steud. in the Herb.
Fielding, Oxford". This fragment, consisting of two leaves
and two spikelets, comprises sufficient material to allow
comparison on the basis of a number of characters. It is
a good match of the type specimen of Avena rigida. It
can therefore be confirmed that Pentameris squarrosa is
a synonym of Pseudopentameris obtusifolia.
This nomenclatural confusion is reflected in past stud-
ies and curatorial practices (cited above). The use of these
confusing names without voucher citations in red data
books (e.g. Hall et al. 1980) results in further confusion
and renders the information in such texts meaningless. In
order to assist in the identification and curation of speci-
mens of this taxon, an extended list of voucher specimens
is provided. The herbarium code JF is used for the her-
barium at Jonkerhoek Forestry Station.
Vouchers: N. Barker 300. 331. 332. 333 (PRE); Burchell 8076 (PRE);
Ellis 2342 (PRE); Esterhuysen 29029. 35396 (BOL, PRE); Esterhuysen
35416 (BOL); Haynes 770 (JF. PRE, STE); Hilton-Taylor 350. 351. 352.
353 (PRE); Kruger KR565 (JF); Levyns 10460 (BOL); Macdonald 634
(PRE, STE); Stokoe 7197 (BOL); Taylor 3023 (PRE, STE).
2. Pseudopentameris brachyphylla (Stapf) Conert
in Mitteilungen der Botanischen Staatssammlung,
Miinchen 10: 304 (1971); N.P. Barker in Gibbs Russell
et al. 278 (1990). Type: Locality unknown, Zeyher 1826a
(K, holo. !).
Danthonia brachyphylla Stapf: 520 (1899).
Plants perennial, caespitose, bases woody and fibrous.
Stems absent. Culms 400-750 mm long. Leaves : sheaths
appressed to culm, persistent; sheath mouth slightly
auriculate; leaf blades 45-150 mm long, open and fiat or
folded. Inflorescence paniculate, lanceolate and con-
tracted. Spikelets 8-20, laterally compressed, 2-flowered,
highly reduced third floret rarely present; glumes two,
more or less equal, 27-37 mm long, 5-7-nerved, char-
taceous, minutely scabrid; lemma body cartilaginous, uni-
formly pubescent, 5. 5-6.5 mm long, 7-9-nerved, nerves
anastomosing into awn base and 12-20 mm long lateral
bristle; lemma lobes 2.0-3. 5 mm long, acute to acuminate,
partly to completely adnate to bristles; central awn geni-
culate, scabrid, contorted basally, 7.5-11.0 mm long from
base to knee, 12-20 mm long from knee to tip; palea
longer than lemma body, bifid at apex. Lodicules two,
glabrous or sparsely ciliolate. Stamens three, 5-8 mm
long. Ovary glabrous, with apical pseudostigmata, styles
short to absent. Fruit 4. 5-6.0 mm long. Flowering time
September-October. The distribution of this species is
given in Figure 3B.
The holotype, Zeyher 1826a housed at Kew is accom-
panied by drawings and annotations in Stapf’s hand. Con-
ert (1971) also cites this specimen, and it carries a ‘det.
slip' bearing his signature. Although the type locality is
not known, PRE has a Zeyher collection of the same
taxon, Zeyher 7825(3, collected at Hemel en Aarde, Swel-
lendam. Although speculative, it is possible that these con-
secutively numbered Zeyher specimens were both
collected from this locality.
Vouchers: N. Barker 731 (PRE); Burman 1180 (BOL); De Vos 1401
(STE); Esterhuysen 33258 (BOL, PRE); Williams 2542 (NBG, PRE).
3. Pseudopentameris maerantha (Schrad). Conert
in Mitteilungen der Botanischen Staatssammlung,
Miinchen 10: 304 (1971); N.P. Barker in Gibbs Russell
et al. 279 (1990). Type: Table Mountain above Kirsten-
bosch. White 5518 (PRE, neo.! here designated).
Danthonia maerantha Schrad. in J.A. Schultes: 385 (1824); Trinius:
t. 63 (1827); Pentameris maerantha (Schrad.) Nees: 312 (1832). Type:
P.B.S., Hesse, s.n. (not traced).
Plants perennial, basally woody, caespitose, becoming
shrub-like with age. Stems branched, 0.5-1. 4 m long, cov-
ered in persistent leaf sheaths. Culms 0. 5-0.8 m long.
Leaves : sheaths appressed to culm, persistent; sheath
mouth somewhat auriculate; leaf blades 45-350 mm long,
open and flat or rolled and filiform. Inflorescence pani-
culate, lanceolate and somewhat contracted. Spikelets
1 0— 25(— 50), laterally compressed, 2-flowered, highly re-
duced third floret rarely present; glumes two, more or less
equal, chartaceous, minutely scabrid or glaucous, 22-50
mm long, 5(-7)-nerved; lemma body cartilaginous, api-
cally pubescent, basally glabrous, 5-8 mm long, 9—1 1 -
nerved, nerves anastomosing into awn base and 9-15 mm
long lateral bristle; lemma lobes 1.5-3. 5 mm long, acute
to acuminate, partly to fully adnate to bristles; central awn
geniculate, scabrid, contorted basally, 5.5-1 1 .0 mm long
from base to knee, 11-18 mm long from knee to tip; palea
longer than lemma body, bifid at apex. Lodicules two,
glabrous or sparsely ciliolate. Stamens three, 5.0-7. 5 mm
long. Ovaty glabrous, with apical pseudostigmata, styles
short to absent. Fruit 4. 5-6.0 mm long. Flowering time
August to September. The distribution of this species is
shown in Figure 3C.
Conert (1971) combined Pentameris maerantha Nees
and Danthonia maerantha Schrad. The Hesse s.n. speci-
men on which Schrader (1824) based his original descrip-
tion of Danthonia maerantha has not been traced, and it
is not known if this specimen was seen by Conert ( 1971 ).
A neotype is designated here in its place.
The absence of a type specimen, and thus accurate flo-
ral measurement data, caused some problems in the allo-
cation of the epithet maerantha to the relevant cluster in
the PCA study. Despite the lack of the type specimen,
Schrader's ( 1824) description includes the spikelel length,
given as 1.5 inches (37.5 mm). As the glumes extend well
beyond any floret parts except the awns, this spikelet
measurement is interpreted to equate to that of the glumes.
As this figure (37.5 mm) is close to the mean glume size
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
147
(37.14 mm) for one of the two clusters distinguished by
the PCA, this cluster is allocated the epithet macrantha
(Figure 1 ).
In contrast to the paucity of information provided by
Schrader. Trinius (1827) provides an elegant description
of this species, referring to an elongate woody rhizome
and a branched culm. This description is accompanied by
a detailed illustration showing a well-developed rhizome.
These characters clearly match the morphology of the
specimens in the rhizomatous cluster of the PCA, which
Schrader’s description implies represents P. macrantha.
Unfortunately, although citing Schrader's description,
Trinius does not provide a collector and number for the
specimen on which his description or illustration is based,
and mentions no type specimen. Therefore the link be-
tween his clear description and the Hesse specimen on
which Schrader’s description was based is tenuous at best.
The Trinius herbarium is presently housed at St Peters-
burg (Leningrad). The grass collection, including Trinius’s
types and the material on which his illustrations are based,
have recently been databased (R. Soreng, Cornell Univer-
sity pers. comm). Computer records indicate that these
include several specimens of Danthonia macrantha. al-
though the type status of these is not certain. All attempts
to communicate with this herbarium have failed, and thus
the unsatisfactory solution of neotypification has been im-
plemented. The second cluster in the PCA is considered
to be a new species and is described below.
Vouchers: Adamson 1251 (BOL): Boucher 2661 (STE); Ellis 2308
(PRE); Morely 176 (STE); White 5518 (PRE).
4. Pseudopentameris caespitosa N.R Barker sp.
nov. a P. macrantha habitu caespitoso, culmis simplicibus,
partibus floralibus grandioribus, glumis 33-60 mm longis,
arista centrali lemmatis 27-M-5 mm longa differt.
Plants perennial with woody or fibrous basal under-
ground parts, caespitose. Stems absent. Culms annual,
0.7- 1.0 m long, sometimes decumbent. Leaves', sheaths
basal, persistent, often purple, appressed to culm; sheath
mouth somewhat auriculate; leaf blades 45-500 mm long,
open and Hat or rolled. Inflorescence paniculate, lanceo-
late and contracted, upper culm and panicle branches pur-
ple. Spikelets 10-20. laterally compressed, 2-flowered,
highly reduced third floret rarely present; glumes two,
more or less equal, 33-60 mm long, 5-9-nerved, char-
taceous, minutely scabrid or glaucous, dark purple when
young; lemma body cartilaginous, apically pubescent,
basally glabrous, 8-10 mm long, 9- 11 -nerved, nerves
anastomosing into awn base and 15-30 mm long lateral
bristle; lemma lobes 2-A mm long, acute to acuminate,
partly to fully adnate to bristles; central awn geniculate,
scabrid, contorted basally, 10-18 mm long from base to
knee. 17-27 mm long from knee to tip; palea longer than
lemma body, bifid at apex. Lodicules two, glabrous or
sparsely ciliolate. Stamens three, up to 9 mm long. Ovary
glabrous, with apical pseudostigmata, styles short to ab-
sent. Fnut 5-6 mm long. Flowering time October-Novem-
ber. The known distribution of this species is shown in
Figure 3D.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3419 (Caledon): Bredasdorp.
(-DC), eastern comer of Farm Buffeljagt, 19-10-1987,
Linder 4362 (BOL, holo.!).
This species is characterised by both its larger floral
structures and its caespitose, unbranched growth form,
hence the specific epithet. The glumes, culms and panicle
branches are often dark purple when young, turning a dark
brown biscuit colour with age, in comparison to the pale
yellow of the glumes of P. macrantha. Although occurring
with P. macrantha in some localities (e.g. Cape Point Na-
ture Reserve, where they have been observed growing
within a metre of each other), P. caespitosa flowers sub-
stantially later than P. macrantha , thus precluding any pos-
sible hybridisation.
In addition to the morphological differences described
above, certain differences in the leaf anatomy have also
been observed. In a phenetic study on a limited number
of anatomical samples. Barker (1990) noted that speci-
mens of what was then named P. macrantha were sepa-
rable into two groups on the basis of three anatomical
characters. One of these groups corresponds to the taxon
here named P. macrantha and has a leaf which is V-shaped
in cross section, with narrow furrows between the ribs
and prickles distributed over the exposed adaxial rib sur-
face. The other group corresponds to P. caespitosa (de-
scribed above) in which the leaf is U-shaped, the furrows
are open and the prickles are restricted to the edges of
the adaxial ribs.
Vouchers: N. Barker 24 (PRE); Boucher & Shepard 4821 (STE);
Ellis 1171. 2515 (PRE); Esterhuysen 31747 (BOL).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to extend my thanks and appreciation to
Mrs A. Romanowski (National Botanical Institute, Preto-
ria) and R. Carelse (University of Cape Town) for the
photographic work. Dr J. Rourke (NBI. Kirstenbosch) for
the Latin translation and nomenclatural advice, Drs E.R.
Robinson (University of the Witwatersrand). R.P Ellis
(Roodeplaat Grasslands Institute), and Prof. H.P. Linder
(University of Cape Town) for their comments on various
aspects of this work. The curators of B, BOL. G. GRA,
K, NBG, OXF; PH, PRE, S, SAM and STE are thanked
for assisting in the tracing and loan of type material. Most
of this work was undertaken for an M.Sc. study at the
University of the Witwatersrand, and was carried out
while the author was in the employ of the National Bo-
tanical Institute, Pretoria.
REFERENCES
BARKER, N.P. 1986. The shape and ultrastructure of the caryopsis of
Pentameris and Pseudopentameris species (Arundinoideae,
Poaceae). Bothalia 16: 65-69.
BARKER. N.P. 1989. The caryopsis surface of Pentameris and
Pseudopentameris (Arundinoideae, Poaceae) revisited. Bothalia
19: 134-136.
BARKER. N.P. 1990. The taxonomy of Pentameris P. Beauv. and
Pseudopentameris Conert. M.Sc. thesis. University of the Wit-
watersrand.
BARKER, N.P. 1993. A biosystematic study of the genus Pentameris
(Arundineae, Poaceae). Bothalia 23: 25-47.
BARKER, N.P. 1994. External fruit morphology of southern African
Arundineae (Arundinoideae: Poaceae). Bothalia 24: 55-66.
148
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
BARKER, N.R & ELLIS, R.R 1991. A new species of Merxmuellera
( Arundinoideae, Poaceae) from South Africa. Bothalia 21 : 27-34.
BOND, P. & GOLDBLATT. P. 1984. Plants of the Cape Flora. A descrip-
tive catalogue. Journal of South African Botany Supplementary
Vol. 13: 1^155.
CHIPPINDALL, L.K.A. 1955. A guide to the identification of grasses in
southern Africa. In D. Meredith, The grasses and pastures of
South Africa. Central News Agency, Cape Town.
CLAYTON, W.D. & RENVOIZE, S.A. 1986. Genera graminum.
Grasses of the World. Her Majesty's Stationery Office. London.
CONERT, H.J. 1971. The genus Danthonia in Africa. Mitteilungen der
Botanischen Staatssammlung, Miinchen 10: 299-308.
DE WET, J.M.J. 1953. Nucleoli numbers in Danthonia polyploids. Cy-
tologia 18: 229-234.
DE WET, J.M.J. 1954a. Stomatal size as a cytological criterion in Dan-
thonia. Cytologia 19: 176-181.
DE WET, J.M.J. 1954b. The genus Danthonia in grass phylogeny. Ameri-
can Journal of Botany 41 : 204—21 1 .
DE WET, J.M.J. 1956. Leaf anatomy and phylogeny in the tribe Dantho-
nieae. American Journal of Botany 43: 175-182.
DE WET, J.M.J. 1960. Leaf anatomy and morphology in South African
species of Danthonia. Bothalia 7: 303-310.
DU PLESSIS, H. & SPIES, J.J. 1988. Chromosome studies on African
plants. 8. Bothalia 18: 119-122.
ELLIS, R.P. 1985a. Leaf anatomy of the South African Danthonieae
(Poaceae). X. Pseudopentameris. Bothalia 15: 561-566.
ELLIS, R.P. 1985b. Leaf anatomy of the South African Danthonieae
(Poaceae). XI. Pentameris longiglumis and Pentameris sp. nov.
Bothalia 15: 567-571.
ELLIS, R.P. & LINDER, H P 1992. Atlas of the leaf anatomy in Pen-
taschistis (Arundineae: Poaceae). Memoirs of the Botanical Sur-
vey of South Africa No. 60.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., WATSON, L„ KOEKEMOER, M„ SMOOK,
L„ BARKER, N.P., ANDERSON, H.M. & DALLWITZ, MJ.
1990. Grasses of southern Africa. Memoirs of the Botanical Sur-
vey of South Africa No. 58.
HALL, A.V., DE WINTER, M„ DE WINTER, B. & VAN OOSTER-
HOUT, S.A.M. 1980. Threatened plants of southern Africa. South
African National Scientific Programmes Report No. 45. CSIR,
Pretoria.
HOCHSTETTER, C.H. 1846. Pflanzen des Cap- und Natal-landes, ge-
sammelt und zusammengestellt van Dr. Ferdinand Krauss. Flora
29: 113-128.
LINDER, H.P. & ELLIS, R.P. 1990. Vegetative morphology and interfire
survival strategies in the Cape Fynbos grasses. Bothalia 20:
91-103.
MARSCHALL VON BIEBERSTEIN, F.A. 1808. Flora taurico-cau-
casica. Vol. 1. Charkow.
NEES AB ESSENBECK, C.G. 1832. Plantae Ecklonianae. Linnaea 7:
273-339.
RENVOIZE, S.A. 1981. The subfamily Arundinoideae and its position in
relation to a general classification of the Gramineae. Kew Bulletin
36: 85-102.
RENVOIZE, S.A. 1986. A survey of leaf blade anatomy in grasses VIII.
Arundinoideae. Kew Bulletin 41: 323-338.
ROHLF, F.J. 1988. NTSYS-pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate
analysis system. Exeter Publishing, Setauket, New York.
SCHULTES J.A. 1824. Mantissa plantarum 2. In J.J. Roemer & J.A.
Schultes, Systematis vegetahilium Caroli a Linne. Stuttgart.
SCHWEICKERDT, H.G. 1938. Descriptions and notes on South African
grasses. Feddes Repertorium 43: 88-92.
SPIES, J.J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1988. Chromosome studies on African
plants. 6. Bothalia 18: 1 1 1-1 14.
SPIES, J.J., DU PLESSIS, H.. BARKER, N.P. & VAN WYK, C. 1990.
Cytogenetic studies in the genus Chaetobromus (Poaceae: Arund-
ineae). Genome 33: 646-658.
STAPF, O. 1899. Gramineae. Flora capensis 7. Reeve, London.
STEUDEL, E.G. 1829. Bemerkungen ueber einige Cyperaceen und
Gramineen vom Vorgebirge der guten Hoffnung. Flora 12:
481-492.
STEUDEL, E.G. 1855. Synopsis plantarum graminearum. Metzler,
Stuttgart.
TOMLINSON, K.L. 1985. Comparative anatomical studies in Danthonia
sensu lato (Danthonieae: Poaceae.). Aliso 1 1: 97-1 14.
TRINIUS, C.B. 1827. Species graminum 6: t. 63. Petropoli.
Bothalia 25,2: 149-153 (1995)
A note on Combretum subgenus Combretum section Macrostigmatea (Com-
bretaceae)
E.F. HENNESSY* and S. RODMAN**
Keywords: Combretum, section Macrostigmatea, southern Africa, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
The history of Combretum section Macrostigmatea, its circumscription and its representation in the Flora of southern Africa
region are provided. A specimen from northern Botswana, Miller B/II99, initially misidentified as C. engleri. is shown to be C.
kirkii, the first record of this taxon in the FSA region. Combretum mkuzense is placed in synonymy in C. zeyheri section
Spathulipetala.
UITTREKSEL
Die geskiedenis van Combretum seksie Macrostigmatea en die omskrywing en verteenwoordiging daarvan in die gebied van
die Flora van suidelike Afrika word voorsien. Daar word aangetoon dat ’n eksemplaar uit noordelike Botswana, Miller B/1199,
wat aanvanklik verkeerd as C. engleri gei'dentifiseer is, C. kirkii is, die eerste rekord van hierdie takson in die FSA-gebied.
Combretum mkuzense word in sinonimie in C. zeyheri seksie Spathulipetala geplaas.
INTRODUCTION
Section Macrostigmatea of Combretum was erected by
Engler & Diels in 1899 to accommodate two taxa, C.
macrostigmateum Engl. & Diels (1899) and C. kirkii M.A.
Lawson (1871). Both taxa have the distal part of the style
expanded, markedly so in C. schumannii , less obviously
so in C. kirkii. In habit and distribution these taxa differ,
C. schumannii being a tree or shrub known from Kenya,
Tanzania, Malawi, Zimbabwe and Mozambique, and C.
kirkii a scandent shrub or liana known to occur only in
the drainage basin of the Zambezi River system and hith-
erto recorded from Zambia, Zimbabwe, Malawi and
Mozambique.
A third taxon, C. engleri Schinz (1901), a multistem-
med virgate shrub, was described from northern Namibia.
This entity has since been recorded in Angola, southwest-
ern Zambia and northern Botswana, growing in substrata
derived from Kalahari sands. Liben (1965) described a
fourth member of the section, C. gillettianum from mate-
rial collected by Glover in northern Zambia. Plants as-
signed to this taxon are small trees or shrubs which to
date have been recorded from Zaire, northern Zambia and
Tanzania.
Of these four taxa, two, C. schumannii and C. engleri ,
(Figure 1 A, B) have Bowers with a glabrous nectariferous
disc, whereas the flowers of C. kirkii and C. gillettianum
(Figure 1C, D) have a pilose disc margin.
Exell (1970) recognized the four taxa enumerated
above as constituting section Macrostigmatea , at the same
* Department of Botany, University of Durban- Westville, Private Bag
X54001 , Durban 4000. Present address: Department of Botany, Univer-
sity of Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209.
** Department of Botany, University of Durban- Westville, Private Bag
X54001. Durban 4000. Present address: 14138 S.E. 238th Lane, Kent,
WA 98042, USA.
MS. received: 1992-11-20.
time expressing the opinion that C. schumannii and C.
engleri might prove to be conspecific, a view shared by
Wickens (1973). Subsequently Exell (1978) formally re-
duced C. engleri to conspecificity in C. schumannii on
the basis that the flowers of both entities have a glabrous
nectariferous disc with a very short (less than 1 mm) free
margin, the fruit of both is glabrous except for peltate
secretory scales and of similar dimensions, and the shrub
habit is common to both.
DISCUSSION
Section Macrostigmatea in southern Africa
Since, of the four entities recognized as species in
1970, only one, C. engleri , has been recorded from the
Flora of southern Africa (FSA) region, it was necessary
to decide whether to follow Exell’s (1978) treatment or
to maintain C. engleri as a species. It was therefore nec-
essary to examine flowering, fruiting and vegetative ma-
terial of C. engleri sensu lato and of C. schumannii sensu
stricto. Of the material labelled C. engleri borrowed from
or seen in situ in southern African herbaria, only a single
specimen. Miller B/1199 from Serondela, Chobe District
in northern Botswana, bore flowers. This specimen, de-
scribed as a straggling shrub, was cited by Exell (1970)
as C. engleri and by Exell (1978) as C. schumannii. When
we dissected flowers we found them to have a pilose disc
margin (Figure 1C), a character which immediately ex-
cluded the specimen from C. engleri and C. schumannii.
Examination of peltate secretory scales of the specimen
(Figure 2A-C) showed that these were structurally similar
to those described (Stace 1969) for C. kirkii and different
from those of a specimen of C. engleri , Maguire 1597 ,
collected in the Caprivi Strip (Figure 3A). Subsequent ex-
amination of peltate secretory scales from type material
of C. kirkii, Kirk s.n. (Figure 2D) and Menyharth s.n.,
1 50
Bothalia 25.2(1995)
FIGURE 1. — Half-flower drawings, x 10: A, Combretum schuman-
nii, Burtt 3826: B, C. engleri, Gossweiler 3241 ; C, C. kirkii ,
Miller B1 199\ D, C. gillettianum, Brenan 8172.
confirmed that, despite its smaller than average flowers,
the depauperate specimen Miller B/II99 should be as-
signed to C. kirkii M.A. Lawson. The locality from which
it was collected, which lies within the drainage basin of
the Zambezi River system, and the straggling shrubby
habit are appropriate for this species. This taxon has not
previously been recorded from the FSA region. It is im-
perative to note that without examination of llowers and
fruit and, in particular, without microscopic examination
of peltate secretory scales at magnification of at least
400 x, it is all too easy to fail to recognize the shrubby
form of C. kirkii. The peltate secretory scales of C. gil-
letlianum (Figure 2E-G) are less divided and mostly
smaller than those of C. kirkii.
All other specimens labelled C. engleri from the FSA
region, all described as shrubs, lacked llowers. Some bore
fruit, some were sterile, but the peltate secretory scales of
all which were examined microscopically were structur-
ally alike and it was therefore concluded that all were
representatives of a single taxon. Specimens of C. engleri ,
among them Gossweiler 3241 (holotype of C. chlorocar-
pum Exell) and Exell & Mendonca 1325 were examined
and found to have scales of the same kind (Figure 2J-M)
as those of specimens labelled C. engleri from the FSA
region (Figure 3A).
Exsiccata of C. schumannii collected in Tanzania and
Malawi, including an isotype, Holst 2375 , were examined
at K and BM. The material of C. schumannii and C.
engleri was compared (Table 1).
Cair (1988) made the significant point that whereas C.
schumannii has been successfully propagated from seed
in cultivation, all attempts to germinate seed of C. engleri
in cultivation to date have failed. All these observations,
together with the fact that as far as one can tell from
existing records there is no overlap in the distribution
ranges of C. schumannii and C. engleri , lead to the con-
clusion that these taxa are not conspecific and therefore
the name C. engleri should be retained, at least until such
time as germination tests have been carried out on material
from Mozambique which is reported to be intermediate
between C. schumannii and C. engleri.
The status of C. mkuzense J.D. Carr & Retief
The reasons for the establishment of C. mkuzense as a
discrete taxon and for its placement in section Macrostig-
matea (Carr & Retief 1989) are unclear since the type
material, Carr 187 (PRE), is patently a specimen of C.
zeyheri Sond. (section Spatlmlipetala). Carr & Retief
(1989) state that the peltate epidermal scales of C.
mkuzense agree well with those of other representatives
of section Macrostigmatea. They fail to mention that the
scales of C. mkuzense and those of C. zeyheri are struc-
turally identical (Figure 3B, C; Table 2), yet they note
that C. zeyheri is present in the area where the specimen
Carr 187 was collected and that the fruit of C. zeyheri
and that of C. mkuzense are alike. They do, however, point
out that C. zeyheri is a small to medium-sized tree,
whereas C. mkuzense is a scrambling shrub. Carr & Retief
in referring to analyses by Rogers of triterpenoid and fla-
vonoid-type compounds of local Combretum spp. (Can- &
Rogers 1987) state that 'examination of the profiles of C.
mkuzense and C. kirkii shows similarities but no signifi-
cant difference’, yet there is no mention in Carr & Ro-
gers’s ( 1987) paper of C. kirkii l They fail to point out that
in the same paper Rogers records that the leaves of C.
mkuzense and C. zeyheri contain exactly the same triter-
penoids and flavonoid-type compounds in the same rela-
tive concentrations. Based on these comments and on
analysis of selected, taxonomically important characters
performed by the second author (Table 2), we conclude
that C. mkuzense cannot be maintained as a discrete taxon,
but must be reduced to synonymy in C. zeyheri Sond.
Combretum Loefl. subgenus Combretum section Macro-
stigmatea Engl. & Diels in Engl., Monographieen afrikan-
ischer Pflanzenfamilien und Gattungen 3: 24 (1899); Stace:
158 (1969); Exell: 176 (1970); Wickens: 21 (1973); Exell:
115 (1978); Stace: 336 (1981). Lectotype: Combretum
FIGURE 2. — Peltate secretory scale heads. A-D, Combretum kirkii : A-C, Miller B/1199: D, Kirk s.n.. E-G, C. gillettianum, Hutchinson & Gillett
3956: H. I. C. schumannii , Burn 3940. J-M, C. engleri : J, K, Gossweiler 3241: L. M, Exell & Mendonga 1325.
macrostigmateum Engl. & Diels = C. schumannii Engl., des-
ignated by Stace (1981).
Small tree, shrub, scandent shrub or liana. Inflorescence
an elongate, subcapitate or capitate spike. Flowers tetramer-
ous; hypanthial tube cupulifonn or broadly infundibuliform,
broader than long; petals ovate to subcircular with entire or
entarginate apex, glabrous; stamens 8, insertion uniseriate
near rim of nectariferous disc; disc concealed within hypan-
thial tube, the narrow free rim glabrous or pilose; style ex-
panded (markedly or slightly) at apex. Fruit sanraroid,
medium-sized to large, 22-55 x 21-50 mm with 4 thinly
chartaceous wings and slender stipe 7-30 mm long; germi-
nation epigeal with cotyledons arising above soil level
(where known); mature peltate secretory scale-heads (35-)
45-85 pm in diameter divided by 8 primary radial walls,
1-several secondary and partial radial walls and several
tangential walls to form 1— 2(— 3) concentric zones of cells.
CONCLUSIONS
Two species of Combretum subgenus Combretum section
Macrostigmatea are currently recorded in tire FSA region, C.
engleri Schinz (which is maintained as distinct from C. schu-
mannii Engl.) and C. kirkii M.A. Lawson which is recorded
in this region for the first time. The entity described by Carr
& Retief ( 1987), C. mkuzense , is shown to be neither a discrete
species nor a member of section Macrostigmatea. but a misi-
dentified specimen of C. zeyheri Sond., section Spathuli-
petala.
TABLE 1. — A comparison of taxonomically important characters of Combretum schumannii and C. engleri
152
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
FIGURE 3. — Peltate secretory scales on abaxial surface of lamina. A,
Combretum engleri, Maguire 1597: B, C. mkuzense (synonym of C.
zeyheri), Carr 187: C, C. zeyheri , Ward 3165. Scale bars: 10 pm.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
Combretum schumannii
TANZANIA. — 0438: Lushoto Dist., Simbili, Holst 2375 (K, iso.!).
0636: Mpwapwa (flowering material), Hornby 311 (BM). Grid ref. un-
known, flowering material: Burn 3826, 3940 (BM).
MALAWI. — 1435: Fort Johnston, Burtl 5986 (BM, K).
C. gillettianum
ZAMBIA. — 0831 (Abercorn Dist.): 1.6 k E of Mpulungu, Angus
773A (BM); flowering material, Brenan & Greenway sub Brenan 8172
(K); Mpulungu, Hutchinson & Gillett 3956 (K); flowering material,
Richards 18416 (K).
C. kirkii
MOZAMBIQUE. — Grid ref. unknown: 14°-19°S, Tete, Kirk s.n. (K.
holo.!); Sambesi, Boroma (Chnore), Menyharth s.n. (K, fragment of
holo.! of C. menyhartii Engl. & Diels).
ZIMBABWE.— 1628: Kariba, Goldsmith 23/59 (BM, K).
BOTSWANA. — 1824 (Kachikau): Serondela, Chobe Dist., flowering
material. Miller B/1199 (PRE).
C. engleri
ANGOLA. — Northeastern region, Lunda Province: Biula, Chicoso
R., Exell & Mendonga 1325 (BM); R. Coxi, Exell & Mendonga 1362
(BM). Southern region, Huila Province: Baixo Cunene. Rocadas, ao km
200 da estrada Sa da Bandeira-Rocadas, Borges 287 (BM, K); Distrito
da Huila Rocadas, Centro de Estudos do Cunene, Da Silva 2943 (K);
Gambos, Chibemba no Tchimbolelo, Menezes 569 (K); Mucope, desta
para Bicuar, flowering material, Menezes 3472 (K). Cuando Cubango
Province: between Kuiriri and Kuito, flowering material, Gossweiler
3241 (BM, holo.! of C. chlorocarpum Exell).
NAMIBIA. — 1714 (Ruacana Falls): 8 Meilen siidlich Otjehua, Kaoko-
veld. (-CA), Giess & Leippert 7581a (NBG). 1715 (Ondangwa): bor-
dering Angola near Oshikango, Ovamboiand, about 32 miles (51.2 km)
east at Eenhana, (-BD), Rodin 2669 (K). 1716 (Eenhana): south of air-
strip at Eenhana, (-AD), Roux 151 (NBG); Amboland, Ombalambuenge,
Ondonga, (-CA), Rautanen 236 (BM, photo.! of holo. ex Z). 1719
(Rundu): Runtu, near Okavango River. Okavango Native Reserve, (-DD),
Maguire 1597 (NBG). 1721 (Mbambi): Kavango, 2 km W of Mbambi,
(-CC), Mueller & Giess 585 (K). 1723 (Singalamwe): Wes Caprivi, Oli-
fantkamp, (-CD), Pienaar & Vahrmeijer 483 (K). 1820 (Tarikora):
Okavango Native Territory, 15 m (24 km) W of Nyangana on road to
Runtu, (-BA), De Winter & Marais 4589 (K). 1821 (Andara): Okavango
Native Territory, 14.8 m (23.7 km) E of Nyangana Mission Station,
(-AA), De Winter & Marais 4778 (K); Okavango Native Territory, An-
dara Mission Station, (-AB). De Winter 4242 (K); Grootfontein-Nord/Ca-
privizipfel, an der Pad von Andara nach Bagani, (-AB/BA), Merxmueller
& Giess 2002 (BM). 1918 (Grootfontein): Neitsas, Diinen, (-BC), Dinter
668 (BM, fragment of syn.! of C. myrtillifolium Engl.); Neitsas, Diinen,
Dinter 7278 (BM, isosyn.!); Hereroland, Otjituuo Reserve 236, 4 km S
of Otjituuo depot in Omatako Omuramba, (-DA), D. Edwards 04398
(K). 2120 (Rietfontein): Hereroland, Epukiro Go 329 Reserve, 10 km S
of Rooiboklaagte Omuramba along red line fence, (-AA), D. Edwards
04416 (K).
BOTSWANA. — 1821 (Andara): Ngamiland, 25 km NE of Tsodilo Hill,
(-DA/DB), Mueller & Biegel 2299 (K); northern base of second highest of
Tsodilo Hills, Mueller & Biegel 2322 (K); slopes of Mount Female, Tsodilo
Hills, Ngamiland, (-DB), Banks 31 (PRE). 1822 (Kangara): near Samoqoma
lediba, flowering material, (-CD), P.A. Smith 2864 (K). 1823 (Siambisso):
‘rhino thicket’ near Xauna Pan, (-AA), P.A. Smith 322 (K). 1920
(Tsumkwe): 38 km north of Aha Hills, (-DB), Wild & Drummond 6986
(K). 2022 (Lake Ngami): 28 m (44.8 km) W of Mabele Pudi Hills, (-CD),
Blair Rains & Yalala 10 (K); Mabelepudi Hills, (-CD), Story 5093 (K).
C. zeyheri
NORTH-WEST.— 2527 (Rustenburg): ‘Macalisberg’, (-DA/DB),
Zeyher 552 (SAM, iso.!).
KWAZULU-NATAL.— 2632 (Bela Vista): Ndumu Hill, Ndumu
Game Reserve, (-CD), Pooley 479 (NU); Mkonyane, Ndumu Game Re-
serve, Pooley 676 (NH). 2732 (Ubombo): Ingwavuma Hills, (-AA), Strey
8170 (NH); 4 m (6.4 km) south of Ingwavuma, Ward 2048 (NH); Ing-
wavuma Dist., Ward 3165 (NH); Ingwavuma, (-AC), Ward 5661 (NH,
UDW); Mkuze Game Reserve, African staff quarters area, (-CA), Can-
187 (PRE, holo.! of C. mkuzense Carr & Retief); Mkuze Game Reserve,
Msinga Sand Forest, White 10388 (PRE); Mkuze Game Reserve,
(-CA/CB), Ward 3568 (PRE); east side of farm, ‘Shotton 13810', (-CD),
Ward 8793 (PRE).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank the keepers and curators of the her-
baria cited for the loan of specimens and for permitting
the use of facilities. Dr J.R. Lawton and Mrs Y. Naidoo
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
153
TABLE 2. — A comparison of taxonomically important characters of Combretum zeyheri and C. mk.uz.ense. Only personally observed characters
have been used in table construction
of the Electron Microscope Unit at the University of Durban-
Westville for help in producing micrographs, Mrs J.B.M.
Browning of the Botany Department, University of Natal
for valuable assistance with the illustrations, Mrs E.L. van
Hooff and Mr A. Rajh for help in the printing of photo-
graphs, and the Foundation for Research Development
(FRD) for financial support.
REFERENCES
CARR, J.D. 1988. Combretaceae in southern Africa. Tree Society of
Southern Africa, Johannesburg.
CARR, J.D. & RETIEF. E. 1989. A new species of Combretum from
Natal. Bothalia 19: 38-40.
CARR, J.D. & ROGERS, B.C. 1987. Chemosystematic studies of the
genus Combretum (Combretaceae), part 1. South African Journal
of Botany 53: 173-176.
ENGLER, H.G.A. & DIELS, F.L.E. 1899. Combretaceae. In
H.G.A.Engler, Monographieen afrikanischer Pflanzenfamilien
und Gattungen 3: 12-189. Engelmann, Leipzig.
EXELL, A.W. 1970. Summary of the Combretaceae of Flora zambesiaca.
Kirkia 7: 159-252.
EXELL, A.W. 1978. Combretaceae. Flora zambesiaca 4: 100-183. Flora
Zambesiaca Managing Committee, London.
LAWSON, M.A. 1871. Combretaceae. Flora of tropica! Africa 2:
413M-36. Reeve, London.
LIBEN, L. 1965. Note sur quelques Combretaceae ( Combretum Loeffl.,
Terminalia L. et Strephonema Hook. f. ) du Congo, du Rwanda et
du Burundi. Bulletin du Jardin Botanique de VEtat, Bruxelles 35:
167-184.
SCH1NZ, H. 1901. Combretaceae. In H. Schinz, Beitrage zur Kenntnis
der afrikanischen Flora (Neue Folge). Bulletin de FHerbier Bois-
sier , Ser. 2,1: 877-879.
STACE, C.A. 1969. The significance of the leaf epidermis in the taxon-
omy of the Combretaceae U. The genus Combretum subgenus
Combretum in Africa. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society
62: 131-168.
STACE. C.A. 1981. The significance of the leaf epidermis in the taxon-
omy of the Combretaceae: conclusions. Botanical Journal of the
Linnean Society 8 1 : 327-339.
WICKENS, G.E. 1973. Combretaceae. In R. M. Polhill. Flora of tropical
East Africa: 1-99. Crown agents for Overseas Governments and
Administrations, London.
Bothalia 25,2: 155-172(1995)
New records and new species of Asclepiadaceae from Namibia
P.V. BRUYNS*
Keywords: Asclepiadaceae, Namibia, new records, new species, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
Eleven species of Asclepiadaceae not previously recorded from Namibia are discussed. Of these, Brachystelma codonan-
thum Bruyns, B. recurvatum Bruyns and Schizoglossum saccatum Bruyns are new species. The new combinations Brachy-
stelma gymnopodum (Schltr.) Bruyns (for Ceropegia pygmaea Schinz) and B. schultzei (Schltr.) Bruyns [for Tenaris schultzei
(Schltr.) E. Phillips] are proposed and the delimitation of Brachystelma R. Br. against Ceropegia L. and Tenaris E. Mey. is
discussed. Notes are also included on little-known species, and the species of Gomphocarpus R. Br. in Namibia are enumerated.
UITTREKSEL
Elf spesies van die Asclepiadaceae wat nog nie voorheen in Namibia aangeteken is nie, word bespreek. Hiervan is
Brachystelma codonanthum Bruyns, B. recurvatum Bruyns en Schizoglossum saccatum Bruyns nuwe spesies. Die nuwe
kombinasies Brachystelma gymnopodum (Schltr.) Bruyns (vir Ceropegia pygmaea Schinz) en B. schultzei (Schltr.) Bruyns [vir
Tenaris schultzei (Schltr.) E. Phillips] word voorgestel en die omgrensing van Brachystelma R. Br. teenoor Ceropegia L. en
Tenaris E. Mey. word bespreek. Notas oor min bekende spesies word ook ingesluit en die spesies van Gomphocarpus R. Br. in
Namibia word opgenoem.
INTRODUCTION
Several collecting trips to Namibia since 1987 have
brought to light species of Asclepiadaceae not previously
recorded from Namibia. Searches through the material
preserved in the National Herbarium, Windhoek (WIND)
have also revealed a few already recorded but not dealt
with in Huber (1967).
The recently published list of Namibian plants (Kol-
berg et al. 1992) has various errors in the account of the
Asclepiadaceae. Some of these are rectified here. Keys
are provided to the taxa where possible. The very con-
fused state of the taxonomy of the complex of genera
around Asclepias does not allow for an exact statement
as to the generic placing of all the species. This problem
is being addressed by Nicholas (pers. comm. 1994) and
once this has been sorted out it should be possible to con-
struct keys to these genera. The genera are arranged al-
phabetically except for those in the Schizoglossum
complex which are all discussed together.
1. ASCLEPIAS L.
Apart from the larger, shrubby species of Asclepias ,
which are here placed under Gomphocarpus , no others
are listed by Huber (1967). However, at least two collec-
tions of small, herbaceous species are known from Na-
mibia. Their identification poses somewhat of a problem
as generally species of the narrow-leaved, herbaceous type
in Asclepias , as with Pachycarpus E. Mey., are known
from the eastern side of southern Africa only (Nicholas
* Bolus Herbarium, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, Rondebosch
7700.
MS. received: 1994-12-02.
1982: 450). Since the genus Asclepias is now intended to
be restricted to the American species (see discussion under
Gomphocarpus ), these will all be moved to other genera
in due course.
Key to the herbaceous species of Asclepias for Namibia
la Leaves at least 3 mm broad at middle, plant branching pro-
fusely from base with spreading stems A. randii
lb Leaves not more than 1.5 mm broad at middle, plant usually
single-stemmed, erect A. aurea
1.1 Asclepias aurea ( Schltr ) Schltr.
A. aurea is widespread along the eastern side of south-
ern Africa and also occurs in Zimbabwe (Brown 1 902—
1904). According to Nicholas ( 1982: 452), it does not oc-
cur in the Cape Province but I have seen plants undoubt-
edly belonging to this species south of Kuruman in the
northern Cape (Bruyns 5836, BOL).
There is a small specimen in WIND which is probably
also referable to A. aurea. However, whereas material
from Kuruman fits the description of A. aurea exactly, in
this Namibian collection there are some differences. It is
slightly more hairy than A. aurea (where the leaves are
glabrous except sometimes for a few hairs on the midrib
beneath) and the peduncles are also much shorter. A brief
description of this material follows.
Plant 100-250 mm tall, stems just over 1 mm thick,
erect, with fine hairs in a single line, intemodes 15-20
mm long. Leaves up to 70.0 x 1.1 mm, scantily hairy on
both sides, ± sessile. Peduncle up to 20 mm long, finely
hairy in a single line, bearing 4 flowers. Pedicel 10-12
mm long, very scantily hairy. Corolla about 8 mm diam.,
lobes with few hairs on dorsal surface. Corona lobes about
156
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
FIGURE 1 . — Asclepias randii, Bruyns 5487. A, portion of plant; B, flower; C, gynostegium with one corona lobe removed; D, half flower, papillae
on inner face of corona lobes clearly visible; E, pollinarium; F, cross-section of leaf, taken near middle. Scale bars: A, 10 mm; B, 2 mm; C,
F, 1 mm; D, 1 mm; E, 0.25 mm.
2.5 mm long, with many papillae inside hood. Otherwise
as in A. aurea.
Specimen examined
NAMIBIA.— 2217 (Windhoek): near Windhoek, (-CA), Seydel4109 ,
coll. Jan. 1965 (WIND).
1 .2 Asclepias randii S. Moore. Figure 1 .
Small herbs belonging probably to this species were
observed among short grasses on a gentle slope in the
Otavi Mountains. According to Brown (1902-1904: 351),
A. randii is known only from central Zimbabwe. However,
the species is very similar to A. modesta N.E. Br. (Nicho-
las pers. comm. 1994) which is known to be widespread
in south tropical Africa with known localities in Tanzania,
Zambia, Malawi and Angola (Brown 1902-1904). The
two seem to be separated mainly by the rather long, erect
apices of the corona lobes in A. randii , which project
somewhat above the gynostegium.
A. modesta was made a synonym of Trachycalymma
pulchellum (Decne.) Bullock (1953: 351), a genus which
Bullock defined mainly by the papillae or ‘papilliform
hairs' on the inner face of the hood formed by the corona.
These papillae are present in both the material illustrated
here of A. randii (Figure ID) and A. aurea but neither
appears to have been referred to Trachycalymma Bullock.
Specimen examined
NAMIBIA. — 1917 (Tsumeb): Otavi Mountains, (-DB), Bruyns 5487
(BOL; K, alcohol only).
2. BRACHYSTELMA Sims
Two new species of Brachystelma are described. The
generic boundaries of Brachystelma against Ceropegia
and Tenaris E. Mey. are discussed and this results in two
new combinations in Brachystelma. A key to these genera
and Macropetalum Burch, is given and also one to all the
species of Brachystelma in Namibia.
2.1 Brachystelma recurvatum Bruyns sp. nov., a
ceteris speciebus lobis corollae pedicellisque longissimis
angustissimis differt. Typus: Namibia, 1917 (Tsumeb):
Otavi Mountains, (-DB), 5-2-1993, Bruyns 5486 (BOL,
holo.; WIND, K, iso.). Figures 2, 3.
Plant with flattened subglobose tuber up to 80 mm
diam., with 1 -several erect simple to branched stems
reaching 60-300 mm tall. Stems 1-2 mm thick, pubescent.
FIGURE 2. — Brachystelma recurvatum , Bruyns 5486 , showing very
slender pedicels and recurved petals.
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
157
FIGURE 3. — Brachystelma recurvatum , Bruyns5486. A, plant, much reduced in length (up to 300 mm tall); B, flower and bud; C, dissected flower;
D, gynostegium; E, pollinarium. Scale bars: A, 10 mm; B, 2 mm; C, 1 mm; D, 0.5 mm; E, 0.25 mm (at B).
green to purplish. Leaves 30-90 x 3-13 mm, narrowly
lanceolate, margins recurved, pubescent on both surfaces,
green, petiole 1.0-1. 5 mm long. Inflorescence extra-axil-
lary, bearing 1-4 successively developing (lowers, pubes-
cent; peduncle 0-2 x 0.5 mm; pedicels 10-16 x 0.25 mm,
purplish. Corolla 7-8 mm diarn.. outside green finely pu-
bescent, inside with fine crinkled white hairs, with very
shallow tube (± 0.5 mm deep) enclosing base of
gynostegium; lobes within greenish black blotched with
very pale yellow (nearly colourless), with ± deltoid basal
portion about 1 .5 mm broad at base then abruptly narrow-
ing into recurved tail ± 6 x 0.5 mm (seen in bud as long
beak), margins recurved. Gynostegium ± 1 .5 mm diani.,
glabrous; outer corona lobes truncate -bifid, pale yellow
with large greenish black patch on inner surface; inner
lobes with dorsal projection confluent with outer lobes
and narrow limb incumbent on anthers nearly equalling
them, with droplets of colourless fluid secreted on backs,
practically colourless (pale yellow).
Brachystelma recurvatum is unlike any other species
known in Namibia, with exceptionally slender pedicels
and corolla lobes. The corolla lobes are strongly recurved
behind the corolla with the narrow tail then sometimes
bent back and partly obscuring the gynostegium, hence
the epithet recurvatum. The corona structure is typical of
the genus with short, truncate-bifid outer corona lobes
and very small inner lobes. Plants were found among
short grasses on a gentle slope between dolomite outcrops
growing in reddish loam. This is the ‘ Tenaris spec, indet
mentioned and illustrated rather poorly in Bruyns (1984)
from a specimen collected west of Outjo (no material
preserved). Since there seems to be some vagueness
about the distinctions between Tenaris and Brachystelma ,
this is discussed separately under 2.4 and 2.5.
2.2 Brachystelma codonanthum Bruyns sp. nov„
a B. dinteri Schltr. cognatum sed (lore campanulato coro-
naque exteriore cupulata, a B. cupulato R.A. Dyer lobis
corollae deltoideis et corona exteriore quinqueloba dis-
cedit. Typus: Namibia, 1918 (Grootfontein): northeast of
Grootfontein, (-BB), Bruyns 5518 (BOL). Figure 4.
Plant arising from a depressed-globose tuber up to 20
x 30 mm. Stem usually solitary, simple, ± erect, 20-150
x ± 1.5 mm. Leaves 11-22 x 9-15 mm, elliptic, tapering
into petiole 1-2 mm long. Flowers in small sessile groups
extra-axillary at nodes, opening successively. Pedicel
spreading, 2-3 x 0.5 mm. Sepals lanceolate, acute, 2 x
0.5 mm. Corolla 5 x 9-10 mm, outside pale green to
brown, inside glabrous obscurely transversely rugose
green to brown with greenish tips, campanulate; tube ±
2.5 x 4.0 mm (across mouth), broadly conical; lobes 3^1
x 3 mm, deltoid, spreading. Gynostegium 1.5 x nearly 3.0
mm, dark brown, glabrous, cupular; outer corona lobes
rising above rim of cup, bifid, narrowing towards apex;
inner lobes cushion-like, arising lower down in cup and
adpressed to backs of anthers near their base, very short
and usually leaving most of anthers uncovered.
Specimens examined
NAMIBIA.— 1819 (Karakuwisa): (-CC), Bruyns 5990 (BOL).1918
(Grootfontein): (-BB), Bruyns 5518 (BOL).
With its solitary, erect stem and elliptical leaves, this
species resembles B. dinteri vegetatively and, when col-
lected, was assumed to be that species. On flowering, it
turned out to have a completely different, campanulate
flower with somewhat cupular corona. In B. dinteri the
outer corona lobes arise between the broad dorsal parts
of the inner lobes which determine the pentagonal shape
of the corona. In B. codonanthum the inner corona lobes
arise on the inside of the cupular outer corona as in B.
cupulatum. From B. cupulatum it is distinguished by dif-
ferently-shaped corolla lobes with rugose surface (oblong
in B. cupulatum , deltoid in B. codonanthum) and the outer
corona cup which is deeply 5-lobed in B. codonanthum
and notched around the apex in B. cupulatum. B. codonan-
158
Bothalia 25,2 ( 1995)
HUURL 4. — Brat hysiclina codonanthum, Bruyns 55/<V. A. portion ol plant; B, flower; C. dissected flower; D, gynoslegium; E, pollinarium. Scale-
bars: A, 10 mm; B, 2 mm; C, 1 mm; D, 0.5 mm; E, 0.25 mm.
thum was found in two places northeast of Grootfontein
growing in deep white sand in open forest.
2.3 Brachystelma blepharanthera (Schltr. ) H.E. Huber
This small species of Brachystelma was not dealt with
in Bruyns (1984) but, alongside that account, Muller
(1984) recorded its ‘rediscovery’ in 1983 after 70 years
since Dinter’s original collections in 1909 and 1910. Ac-
tually it had been collected long before this in 1968 by
C. Grabow near Gobabis, but this and another collection
by Woodman from north of Okahandja remained uniden-
tified at WIND until recently.
More intensive collecting over southern Namibia has
revealed that this species is widely distributed in the
southern half of the country from Gobabis and Okahandja
southwards to Helmeringhausen. In the southern parts ii
is the only known species of Brachystelma (Figure 5).
Unlike other species, B. blepharanthera grows in arid
places on pebbly or stony ground usually in the open or
among short bushes (sometimes even among Rhigozum
trichotomum). From Gobabis to Windhoek and south
wards to Nauchas it was mainly seen in spots with a
scanty cover of small bushes with the ground densely
strewn wilh quartz and other small pebbles. Several times
it was observed growing with Lithops pseudotruncatella.
Around Helmeringhausen il was usually found on stony,
north-facing mountain slopes.
The tuber of B. blepharanthera is usually cylindrical
to irregularly top-shaped (Figure 6A) or very occasionally
flattened discoid. The largest seen was ± 80 x 50 mm and
several up to 80 mm long and only 20-30 mm thick were
found. This shape is unique in Brachystelma. It is often
tightly wedged among stones and can be difficult to ex-
tract. In ihe northern part of the distribution, plants seen
were rarely more than 50 mm tall above the soil with the
branches spreading horizontally up to about 100 mm. Fur-
ther south, the plant may be erect wilh stems up to 300
mm tall. The cylindrical stems are almost always finely
mottled with purple and the small leaves are usually crin-
kled (as in the largest plant in Figure 6A).
Generally in this species the sepals are green to
brownish, the corolla tube is white (sometimes lightly suf-
fused with pink), the lobes are green (sometimes with pur-
plish margin), the inner corona lobes are green whereas
the rest of the gynostegium is white. In the northern part
of the range the corolla lobes vary from 2^4 mm long.
1'IGUKE 5. Dlsirihuiion ol Brachystelma hlcpluiranthera,9 ; and
Pachycctrpus schweinfurthii, A, in Namibia.
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
159
FIGURE 6. — A, B, Brachystelma blepharanthera, Bruyns 5818\ A, three
plants excavated to show peculiar elongated tubers, usually crin-
kled leaves clearly visible in plant with largest tuber: B, plant with
the flowers are nodding (Figure 6B) and the club-shaped
inner corona lobes are widely divergent to almost hori-
zontally spreading. Towards the base the inner surface of
the corolla lobe is usually covered with papillae each
topped by a fine hair. Around Maltahohe plants were col-
lected with flowers held erect and with the base of the
corolla lobes entirely smooth within. Near Helmering-
hausen the flower was nodding once more (Figure 7K),
the corolla lobes were much longer (5 mm) and narrower,
the papillae with hairs were again present but the corona
lobes, though still club-shaped, were much less thickened
towards their tips and were connivent rather than widely
diverging (Figure 7L).
Specimens examined
NAMIBIA.— 2116 (Okahandja): (-BA), Woortman 221 (WIND).
2118 (Steinhausen): (-DC), Grabow 19 (WIND). 2216 (Otjimbingwe):
(-DB), Van Vuuren s.n. (WIND); (-DD), Bnivns 5626 (K). 2217 (Wind-
hoek): (-CA), Van Vuuren s.n. (WIND). 2218 (Gobabis): (-BA), Bruyns
5818 (WIND). 2316 (Nauchas): (-AD), Pehlemann 1334 (WIND);
(-CB), Bruyns 5639 (BOL). 2416 (Maltahohe): (-DD), Bruyns 5658
(BOL). 2516 (Helmeringhausen): (-BC), Bruyns 5681 (BOL); (-CD),
Bruyns 5703 (BOL); (-DC), Bruyns 5734 (BOL).
Brachystelma gymnopodum , a new name for
Ceropegia pygmaea Schinz
The genera Brachystelma and Ceropegia have similar
distributions around the perimeter of the Indian Ocean
from southern Africa to Australia. The only recent regional
treatments of both genera have covered southern Africa
(Dyer 1980) and Australasia (Forster 1988; Bruyns & For-
ster 1989). None of these accounts deals with the problem
of the boundaries between the two genera which is not
as insignificant as this neglect may imply. Dyer (1980)
followed Brown ( 1907-1909) in separating the two genera
as follows:
la Corolla tubular with the tube usually 2 to several times as
long as its diameter at middle Ceropegia
lb Corolla opening nearly flat or tube campanulate, when tubular
then less than twice as long as its diameter at middle . .
Brachystelma
Many genera within the Stapelieae exhibit variation in
the corolla from nearly rotate through campanulate to tu-
bular (cf. Stapelia leendertziae N.E. Br., Tridentea cho-
anantha (Lavranos & Hall) L.C. Leach, Echidnopsis
mijerteina Lavranos as extreme examples within their re-
spective genera) and it is therefore not surprising to find
this variation in Brachystelma. However, the tubular-flow-
ered species of Brachystelma (such as B. oianthum Schltr.)
may begin to resemble Ceropegia as it is defined above.
Similarly some species may have been placed in Ceropegia
because of this single character while their closest relatives
are in Brachystelma.
The generic position of Ceropegia pygmaea is of con-
cern here. It is clear from Brown (1902-1904), Huber
(1957) and Dyer (1980) that C. pygmaea occupies an iso-
lated position in Ceropegia , where its very long corolla
tube places it according to the above definition.
In general the gynostegium of Ceropegia has a shal-
lowly cupular outer corona with the usually bifid lobes
only slightly overtopping the bases of the inner lobes. The
dorsiventrally flattened inner lobes are incumbent on the
backs of the anthers and then rise up, connivent, in a col-
umn above the centre of the style head. Whereas exactly
this inner corona structure is found randomly in several
genera, but is useful there only to separate species [cf.
Lavrania cactiformis (Hook.) Bruyns and L. picta (N.E.
Br.) Bruyns, (1993)], it is remarkably reliable in separating
Ceropegia from its allies. As far as I am aware there are
only three species out of about 160 where this is not
found: C. pygmaea (southern Africa), C. loranthiflora K.
Schum. (Ethiopia: own unpublished drawings of material
at K) and C. dorjei C.E.C. Fisch. [Bhutan: illustrated in
Huber (1957) but gynostegium possibly based on a juve-
nile flower].
The gynostegium in Brachystelma on the other hand,
has an extremely variable outer corona: from slender bifid
lobes to a tube containing the whole gynostegium. The
inner corona lobes are invariably small and often only just
touch the backs of the anthers near their base. In a few
cases they exceed them, rising up connivent in a column
above the style head as in Ceropegia: B. blepharanthera ,
B. dyeri K. Balkwill, B. gracile E.A. Bruce, B. pachypo-
diutn R.A. Dyer and B. schizoglossoides (Schltr.) N.E. Br.
are the only examples known to me. In all these the co-
rolla tube is shorter than it is broad and so these species
separate out (according to Dyer 1980) clearly as Brachy-
stelma, where their closest relatives are as well.
160
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
In Ceropegia pygmaea the outer corona forms a deep
cup hiding the rest of the gynostegium (Figure 8G, H).
The inner corona lobes are short, touching the backs of
the anthers and do not exceed them (Figure 8K). As can
be seen, the corolla is very variable in length, ranging
from twice its maximum breadth with the mouth up-
turned (Figure 8B) to about five times its maximum
breadth (Figures 8C; 9) with the mouth turned down to-
wards the soil and usually touching it or even becoming
slightly buried among leaf litter and loose sand [exactly
as observed in Echidnopsis ballyi (Mam. -Lap.) P.R.O.
Bally, (Bruyns 1988)].
In C. pvgmaea the leaves vary from broadly ovate
to linear. Narrow-leaved forms are difficult to distin-
guish when sterile from Brachystelma stenophyllum
(Schltr.) R.A. Dyer and, in fact, vegetatively these two
are very similar: both are small plants arising from a
flattened-globose tuber with short stems branched just
above ground level, producing a cluster of leaves usually
close to the ground with flowers developing on short, hori-
zontal peduncles near the base of the stems. Their
gynostegia are almost identical. A similar corona structure
is also found in B. cupulatum and B. brevipedicellatum
Turrill. These four species possibly form a group with
corolla increasing in tubularity from the nearly rotate
state in B. brevipedicellatum via B. stenophyllum (illus-
trated in Bruyns 1984) to the deep tube of C. pygmaea.
Whereas C. pygmaea occupies an isolated position in
Ceropegia, its close affinities to B. stenophyllum suggest
that it would be much better accommodated in Brachy-
stelma and it is therefore transferred to that genus. How-
ever, it cannot be called Brachystelma pygmaeum because
of the earlier and validly published Brachystelma pyg-
maeum (Schltr.) N.E. Br. Therefore a new combination is
required:
FIGURE 1 .—Brachystelma blepharanthera. A, D, H, K, flowers; B, E, I, L, dissected flower showing gynostegium from side; F, face view of
gynostegium; J, half flower; C, G, M, pollinaria. Scale bars: A, D, H, K, I mm (at A); B, E, F, I, J, L, 0.5 mm (at B); C, G, M, 0.25 mm (at
C). A-C, Bruyns 5626 ; D-G, Bruyns 5659; H-J, Bruyns 565<S; K-M, Bruyns 5703.
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
161
FIGURE 8. — Brachystelma gymnopodum ( Ceropegia pygmaea). A-C, flowers; D-F, corolla dissected; G, H, side view of corona; I, J, face view of
gynostegium; K, dissected gynostegium; L, M, pollinaria; N, O, hairs in corolla tube. Scale bars: A, B, D, E, F, 3 mm (at A); C, 5 mm: G. H,
I, J, 1 mm (at G); K, 1 mm; L, M, 0.25 mm (at L); N, O, 0.5 mm (at N). Drawn from: A, D, G, I, K, L, N, Bricyns 2078 , Gravelotte, eastern
2.4 Brachystelma gymnopodum (Schltr.) Bniyns ,
comb. nov. Ceropegia gymnopoda Schltr. in Bulletin de
l'Herbier Boissier 4: 450 (1896). Type; Namibia, Rait-
tanen 82 (Z).
Ceropegia pygmaea Schinz (1888). Type: Namibia, Schinz 147 (Z).
Figures 8, 9.
Tenaris E. Mey. in Namibia? A new combination
in Brachystelma for Tenaris schultzei (Schltr.)
E. Phillips
Brown (1902-1904) listed three species of Tenaris
from tropical Africa (two from Somalia and one from Tan-
zania) and commented that There is little beyond habit to
distinguish this genus from Brachystelma.' . In the key he
used the Terminal raceme or lax panicle’ of flowers to
distinguish these species from Brachystelma. Brown
(1907-1909) listed four species of Tenaris for South Af-
rica. In this account he used characters of the flower ‘co-
rolla tube very short; lobes free, not reflexed’ etc. to
distinguish Tenaris from Brachystelma but it is not clear
how this could succeed in separating these genera, for
there are many species of Brachystelma to which this
would apply equally well. It appears that T. chlorantha
Schltr., where there is no Terminal raceme or lax panicle',
may be the reason for Brown’s abandoning his earlier dis-
tinctions for Tenaris.
The seven species listed in Brown (1902-1909) appear
to share the following characteristics;
Flowering stems slender, erect, unbranched, glabrous;
leaves linear 1-2 mm broad or filiform, blade narrower
than midrib on flowering stems, glabrous; peduncle and
FIGURE 9. — Brachystelma gymnopodum. Bniyns 5512. Plant with
broad leaves and very long corolla touching ground at anthesis.
162
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
pedicel glabrous; exterior of corolla glabrous; follicles
glabrous. Some of these characters are found in species
of Brachystelma but no Brachystelma has all of them.
Another species, Tenaris schultzei (Schltr.) E. Phillips was
added in 1941. Here, although the plant often has only a
single stem and linear leaves 1-2 mm broad, the stem may
branch above and the flowers are not borne on long, slender,
unbranched stems. The entire plant is pilose. Schlechter
(1914) intended describing this species as a Brachystelma
but decided, after a more thorough examination of the
gynostegium, that the long, connivent inner corona lobes
were more similar to those in Ceropegia than Brachystelma.
However, the corolla was entirely different from Ceropegia
and hence he placed it in a separate genus Kinepetalum
Schltr. Phillips’ (1941) placing of this species in Tenaris was
not justified by any discussion and, indeed, if it is to be
accepted, then it is unclear how Tenaris should be defined.
Dyer (1975), partly following Brown (1907-1909), charac-
terised Tenaris by ’Corolla tube almost obsolete, with linear,
linear-spathulate or sometimes filiform lobes, slender erect
herbs with tubers’. However, ‘corolla tube almost obsolete’
and ‘slender erect herbs with tubers’ would fit many species
of Brachystelma and T. schultzei [as illustrated in Bruyns
(1984)] would not fit comfortably into ‘slender erect herbs’.
Also ‘linear’ or ‘filiform lobes’ would fit some species of
Brachystelma as well (e.g. B. recurvation , B. gracile).
Schlechter was in favour of segregating many species
from Brachystelma but most of his segregate genera were
abandoned by Brown (1902-1904). Bullock (1953)
seems to have intended reviving some of these segregates
and started moving species to Dichaelia, but this was
abandoned by Dyer (1980). If one is to make the treat-
ment of this group consistent with that being applied in
the Asclepiadeae, and elsewhere in the Stapelieae, then
one will have to examine Bullock’s statement (1953: 358)
that Brachystelma is unsatisfactorily ‘heterogeneous’ in
some detail. In my opinion Bullock’s statement is not
true except perhaps in respect of the inclusion within the
genus of those species with fusiform roots. These species
differ in their vegetative parts and florally quite substan-
tially from the remainder of the genus. Also, Dichaelia ,
as Bullock envisaged it, is unsatisfactory and it would
be unwise to resurrect the genera Siphonostelma Schltr.
and Kinepetalum which seem to be superfluous.
Nevertheless there appears to be a case for maintaining
Tenaris as distinct from Brachystelma provided it is con-
fined to the seven species of Brown (1902-1904; 1907-1909).
Brachystelma christianeae Peckover (1992) also belongs to
this genus. Furthermore, it needs to be considered carefully
whether Tenaris should be united with the monotypic
Macropetalum which also shares most of the above-mentioned
characters. There seems to be no justification for placing T.
schultzei in Tenaris and it should be moved to Brachystelma.
This change is effected below.
2.5 Brachystelma schultzei (Schltr.) Bruyns comb. nov.
Kinepetalum schultzei Schltr. in Botanische Jahrbiicher 51: 150
(1914). Tenaris schultzei (Schltr.) E. Phillips (1941). Lectotype: Namibia,
Okakuja, Dinter 2528 (SAM).
To summarise the information above, one may separate
the four genera Brachystelma , Ceropegia , Macropetalum
and Tenaris as follows:
la Corolla rotate to campanulate, tube broader than long, if
longer, then inner corona lobes not exceeding anthers:
2a Flowering stems slender, unbranched glabrous; leaves linear
or filiform, 1-2 mm broad, glabrous; exterior of corolla
glabrous:
3a Pedicel glabrous, anthers horizontal, pollinia inserted at
level of top of style head Tenaris
3b Pedicel pilose, anthers erect, pollinia inserted about half-
way up style head Macropetalum
2b Flowers amongst leaves on short often spreading, branched
stems; stems pubescent; leaves pilose, usually with distinct
blade narrowing into petiole and to apex; exterior of co-
rolla pilose [at least one of these must apply, many species
will not satisfy all of them] Brachystelma
1 b Corolla with tube longer than max. breadth; inner corona lobes
exceeding anthers, connivent into column above style
head Ceropegia
The key to Brachystelma in Namibia in Bruyns (1984)
is incomplete, dealing only with the five species discussed
there. There are now 1 1 species recognised from Namibia
and it is necessary to construct a key to them. This key
is somewhat complicated, using characters of the corona
as well as more obvious ones.
Key to Brachystelma spp. in Namibia
1 a Outer corona lobes united above anthers into an entire to 5-lobed cup with inner lobes cushion-like fused to inside of cup ± half-way up:
2a Corolla tube more than twice as long as lobes B. gymnopodum
2b Corolla tube shorter than lobes:
3a Corolla lobes ovate-lanceolate becoming linear above, fused at apices B. stenophyllum
3b Corolla lobes deltoid to oblong, not becoming linear above, free at apices:
4a Corolla lobes oblong 4.5-6.0 mm long, cup formed by outer corona with 5 small notches in margin B. cupulatum
4b Corolla lobes deltoid 3-4 mm long, outer corona cup deeply 5-lobed with each lobe bifid and narrowing towards apex . ... B. codonanthum
lb Outer and inner corona lobes not as above:
5a inner corona lobes much longer than anthers, rising up and connivent above style head or widely separating:
6a Corolla lobes lanceolate-oblong to narrowly deltoid, 2^4 x as long as broad at base, inner corona lobes clavate B. blepharanthera
6b Corolla lobes ± filiform, about 10 x as long as broad at base, inner corona lobes uniformly wide to tips B. schultzei
5b Inner corona lobes shorter than anthers, not rising up above style head:
7a Pedicel 10-35 mm long:
8a Corolla rotate, lobes not recurved, with clavate cilia along margins B. schinzii
8b Corolla with recurved lobes without cilia along margins:
9a Corolla glabrous within, lobes 2-3 x 1 mm B. amotii
9b Corolla pubescent within, lobes ± 7.5 x 1.5 mm B. recurvatum
7b Pedicel 1-5 mm long:
10a Corolla faintly rugose within, lobes ± deltoid (1.0-1. 5 x as long as broad at base) B. dinteri
10b Corolla smooth within, lobes linear to filiform (at least 4 x as long as broad at base) B. circinatum
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
163
3. CEROPEGIA L.
3.1 Ceropegia filiformis (Burch.) Schltr.
The collections cited below are the first known from
Namibia and extend the known distribution of this species
about 450 km to the west. There are no known localities
from the intervening territory between these Namibian
gatherings and that of William Burchell, who originally
discovered it in 1812 between Kloof and Witwater, south-
west of Griquastad in the northern Cape. The distribution
map (Figure 10) has been compiled from material seen
in BOL, NBG, from PRECIS records, collections (2922
BB, 2824 CD) cited by Wilman (1946) and two collec-
tions in cultivation in Cape Town. From the map the ex-
tremely wide and scattered range is clear with the records
from Namibia providing a remarkable case of vicariance.
Most of the other known localities lie on the Great Karoo
in the Cape from Richmond eastwards to Colesburg and
south to Pearston and Somerset East with further unusual
records in the southwest between Sutherland and Fraser-
burg. There is a single collection from the Orange Free
State near Liickhoff. This distribution is unique in the ge-
nus (Bruyns 1985).
In January 1989, after good rains had fallen, several
colonies of plants were found on the eastern side of the
Great Karas Mountains. Plants were scrambling in the
open among stones or climbing on Rhigozum trichotomum
bushes on flat areas on the summit of mountains. On the
western side (seen February 1993) they are also quite
plentiful at higher levels and usually found climbing on
Rhigozum trichotomum.
Specimens of Ceropegia filiformis are extremely in-
conspicuous. The plant usually consists of an unbranched,
thin (about 1 mm thick) cylindrical stem (up to 0.8 m but
usually 150-300 mm long) arising from a dense cluster
of thick, spreading, whitish, fusiform roots. The leaves are
narrow, linear-lanceolate. On the other hand the flowers,
which are 50-60 mm long, are quite striking. Most of the
exterior is greyish mottled with purple. The contrast on
the lobes of white on the medial keel against the dull
purple remainder and striking, narrow, replicate, purple-
black margin makes them easily visible. A peculiar feature
of this deeply coloured margin, which has particularly
large epidermal cells, is the secretion along its length of
regularly spaced droplets of a clear liquid. The function
of this liquid remains unknown. The inside of the basal
inflation of the corolla is white with longitudinal green
stripes on which rows of scattered green papillae are lo-
cated. These stripes continue up into the constricted part
of the tube without the papillae. There are no hairs at all
inside the corolla tube (Figure 11).
The outer corona has unusual, thickened, brownish or
purple-red apices. The rest of the corona is white to yel-
low-white, flecked with purple-red spots, quite densely on
the inner corona lobes, sparsely on the outer lobes. The
raised style-head projecting above the anthers (Figure
11F) is most unusual. This is known in a few Brachy-
stelma species but not in any other Ceropegia.
C. filiformis is unusual among the species with fusi-
form roots, slender non-succulent stems and leaves in that
the stems are cylindrical and not angled. Its affinities
among the other southern African species remain unclear.
Specimens examined
NAMIBIA. — 2718 (Grtinau): Great Karas Mountains, (-BC), ± 1 650
m, Bruyns 5767 (WIND): (-BD), 1 600-1 700 m, Bruyns 3523 (BOL,
WIND); (-DA), ± 1 600 m, Bruyns 5806 (WIND).
NORTHERN CAPE.— 3123 (Victoria West): (-DD), Tyson 410
(BOL); (-CA), Bruyns 4230 (no specimen). 3124 (Hanover): (-AD),
Bruyns 3275 (BOL); (-CC), Meve 347 (BOL). 3221 (Merweville):
(-AA), Bruyns 4840 (BOL); (-BC), Bruyns 5969 (BOL).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3125 (Steynsburg): (-CC), Bruyns 5060 (no
specimen). 3224 (Graaff-Reinet): (-BD), Bruyns I960 (NBG). 3225
(Somerset East): (-AB), Bruyns 1767 (NBG); (-BA), J.R. James (BOL).
3.2 Ceropegia dinteri Schltr.
Dinter first collected this species around Rehoboth,
where it has not been seen again. Several gatherings have
been made from west of Outjo to Grootfontein (Bruyns
1984). The four collections listed below extend the known
distribution over 400 km to the north and make it possible
that this rare and inconspicuous species occurs in Angola.
Plants were found on dolomite and granite hillsides
growing between rocks or in stony bare patches under
trees. Tubers were observed from 25-60 mm in diameter.
The stem (1.0- 1.5 mm thick) is frail and spindly but
reaches a height of over 500 mm with leaves up to 100
mm long. If the plant is growing in the open among short
grasses, the stem is short — the stem in Figure 12 was
about 150 mm long. Flowers are exceptionally variable
with no two the same in size, shape or colouring. The
differences between flowers illustrated in Dyer (1983: t.
17) and the present Figures 12 & 13C give some idea of
this variability.
Specimens examined
NAMIBIA. — 1713 (Swartbooisdrif): (-AC), 1 200-1 500 m, Bruyns
4092 (BOL); (-DA), 1 170 m, Bruyns 4095. 1813 (Opuwo): (-DD), Bruyns
5548 (BOL); south of Kaoko Otavi, 18-02-1993, Bruyns 5557 (K).
164
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
FIGURE 1 1 . — Ceropegiafiliformis. A, plan!; B, bud; C-E, flower; F, l.s. of inflated base of flower: longitudinal ridges of papillae; G, papillae from within basal
inflation of flower. H-L, gynostegium: J, one corona lobe removed; L, top, outer corona and one inner corona lobe removed, anthers and ± elongated
style-head. M, N, poll inaria. Scale bars: A, 10 mm; B-F, 3 mm (at C); G-K, 1 mm (at H); L, 0.5 mm; M, N, 0.25 mm (at H). A, B, C, 1, L, Bmyns 3275;
D, K, N, Bmyns 3523 ; E, J. M, Bmyns I960', F, G, H, Meve 347.
Bothaliu 25,2 (1995)
165
FIGURE 12. — Ceropegia dinteri , Bruyns 5557. Flower: corolla tube 41
mm long.
4. GOMPHOCARPUS R. Br.
According to Bullock (1952: 406) and Nicholas &
Goyder (1992), the genus Asclepias should be confined
to species from the New World since the type species, A.
syriaca L., is an American species. Most of the larger,
shrubby species from Africa placed in Asclepias by Brown
should be referred to Gomphocarpus R. Br. The majority
of the names have already been transferred to Gompho-
carpus and it is only necessary now to decide which spe-
cies occur in Namibia.
In Kolberg et al. (1992), Asclepias buchenaviana and
A. fruticosa appear under Asclepias whereas Gomphocar-
pus tomentosus is listed under Gomphocarpus. If Bul-
lock’s system is to be used then clearly this is inconsistent
and all three should appear under Gomphocarpus as in
Bullock (1952). Three other species are also known from
Namibia and are listed neither in Huber (1967) nor Kol-
berg et al. (1992).
A key is provided for all the species now known for
Namibia and, since the synonymy of some is rather com-
plicated, this is listed and discussed briefly.
Key to Gomphocarpus in Namibia
la Leaves not more than 2 mm broad, follicles 4—6 mm broad
when mature G. filifonnis
lb Leaves broader than 4 mm, follicles usually much more than
15 mm broad when mature:
2a Plant glabrous in all parts, leaves at least 25 mm broad with
rounded lobes clasping stem at base G. glaucophyllus
2b Plant pubescent or puberulous at least on young shoots and
leaves, leaves less than 20 mm broad at max., subsessile
to shortly petiolate without stem-clasping basal lobes:
3a Leaves oblong-lanceolate to elliptic, usually rounded at
base, coriaceous and somewhat rigid G. cancellatus
3b Leaves linear or linear-lanceolate, acute, tapering gradually
into petiole, thin:
4a Follicle without bristles on exterior, produced into apical
beak at least 25 mm long G. rosiratus
4b Follicle covered with soft bristles, beak not more than
15 mm long:
5a Young parts of stem, leaves and inflorescences densely
white-tomentose (plant grey-green)
G. tomentosus
5b Young parts of stem, leaves and inflorescence not
densely white-tomentose (plant yellow-green) . .
G. fruticosus
4.1 Gomphocarpus cancellatus (Bunn, f) Bruyns ,
comb. nov. Asclepias ccincellata Burnt, f., Flora Indica:
cui accedit series zoophytorum indicorum nec non pro-
dromus florae capensis: 7 (betw. 1 March and 6 Apr.
1768).
A. rotandifolia Miller (1768).
A. arborescens L.: 216 (1771). Gomphocarpus arborescens (L.) W.T.
Aiton: 79 (1811).
A. pubescens L.: 215 (1771).
Brown (1907-1909) was incorrect in using the name
A. rotundifolia Miller as this was published on 16 April
1768, slightly after A. cancellata. Several other names ex-
ist for this plant, of which only Asclepias arborescens L.
has been transferred to Gomphocarpus.
G. cancellatus is common in the southwestern Cape
and even occurs in places as a roadside weed. In
Namaqualand and the Richtersveld it is rare and there
appears to be only a single record of its occurrence in
Namibia, some distance north of Rosh Pinah but well
within the winter rainfall zone.
Specimen examined
NAMIBIA. — 2716 (Witpiitz): (-DA), Bruyns 3927 (BOL).
4.2 Gomphocarpus filiformis ( E . Mey.) Dietr..
Synopsis plantarum 2: 900 (1839-1852). Lagarinthus fili-
formis E. Mey.: 203 (1836-1838). Asclepias filifonnis (E.
Mey.) O. Kunze: 268 (1886) non Jacq. (1760).
Asclepias buchenaviana Schinz: 261 (1888). A. filifonnis var.
buchenaviana (Schinz) N.E. Br.: 336 (1902-1904).
The name Asclepias buchenaviana has become famil-
iar. The species was first described as Lagarinthus filifor-
mis by Meyer in 1837 but this name cannot be used in
Asclepias because of Asclepias filifonnis Jacq. (1760), a
species from the Caribbean. However, there is no reason
for it not to be used in Gomphocarpus.
4.3 Gomphocarpus fruticosus (L.) W.T. Aiton. Hoitus
kewensis (1810-1813).
Asclepias fruticosa L.: 216 (1753).
166
Bolhalia 25,2 (1995)
4.4 Gomphocarpus glaucophyllus Schltr. 19(1 894).
Asclepias glaucophylla (Schltr.) Schltr.: 455 (1896).
Rare, only found in the northeastern portion of Namibia.
Specimen examined
NAMIBIA. — 1718 (Nkurenkuru): (-CD), De Winter 3881 (WIND).
4.5 Gomphocarpus rostratus {N.E. Br.) Bullock in
Kew Bulletin: 410 (1952).
Asdepias rostrata N.E. Br.: 331 (1902-1904).
A widespread species in tropical Africa known from
Kenya, Tanzania (Bullock l.c.), Angola and Botswana
(Brown l.c.) and from two collections in Namibia.
FIGURE 13. — Ceropegia dinteri. A, plant; B, cross-section of leaf taken more or less in middle; C, flower; D, base of corolla dissected; E, F,
gynostegium; G, pollinarium. Scale bars: A, 10 mm; B, I mm; C, 3 mm; D, 2 mm; E, F, 0.5 mm; G, 0.25 mm. F drawn from Bruyns 2062 ,
Outjo, remainder from Bruyns 4095.
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
167
Specimens examined
NAMIBIA. — 1719 (Rundu): (-DC), De Winter & Marais 5037
(WIND). 1724 (Katima Mulilo): (-DD), Killick c£ Leistner 3153
(WIND).
4.6 Gomphocarpus tomentosus Burch., Travels 1 :
453 (1822). Asclepias burchellii Schltr. : 336 (1895).
Bullock (1952: 406) regarded this taxon as a synonym
of G. fruticosus but, as Huber (1967) pointed out, two
distinct species appear to be involved.
5. PACHYCARPUS E. Mey.
Smith (1988) revised the southern African species of
Pachycarpus, recognising 24 species for the region. All
of them seem to occur only on the eastern side of southern
Africa and neither there nor in Huber (1967) are any spe-
cies mentioned for Namibia. Nevertheless, as early as
1955, B. de Winter gathered a plant clearly identifiable
as a Pachycarpus in northern Namibia. Recent collections
by B. Strohbach and myself have again brought to light
the same taxon.
5.1 Pachycarpus schweinfurthii (N.E. Br.) Bullock
According to Bullock (1953), P. schweinfurthii is very
widely distributed in tropical Africa from Nigeria and Su-
dan southwards to Angola and Zimbabwe. In Namibia it
only occurs in the moister northeastern region (Figure 5)
and its occurrence in Botswana is also likely.
I have attempted to insert P. schweinfurthii into Smith’s
( 1 988) key to the southern African species of Pachycarpus
(see below) by adding an extra couplet, and a description
is also provided. Unfortunately the drawings in Smith’s
paper are not clear and it is hard to see what the characters
used in the key really refer to, especially as there is no
explanation of the terminology adopted for the different
floral parts. In the specimen here the guide rails (anther
wings of Smith) are a little over 3 mm long. The distance
from the edge of the rail to the centre of the flower in-
creases as one goes from the corpusculum towards the
base of the flower (clearly seen in Figure 14D) and I
assume that this is what Smith means by ‘outer margin
concave’. I have changed this to ‘with concave margin’
as there is no ‘inner’ margin which the use of 'outer' im-
plies.
It may be of use to observe here that the ‘corona lobes’
referred to above and throughout Smith (1988) are the
‘staminal corona’ lobes of Kunze (1982) corresponding to
the ‘inner corona lobes’ of the Stapelieae. It seems to be
assumed generally that in the species in the Asclepias -
Gowp/iocwpits-Pachycarpus-Schizoglossum complex the
corona only consists of these five lobes of staminal origin.
However, in most species 1 have looked at, there are five
more lobes which are of interstaminal origin (Kunze
1982). Unlike in the Stapelieae (where these ‘outer corona
lobes’ are generally well developed), here they are minute
and mostly hidden behind and below the large mouth at
FIGURE 14. — Pachycarpus schweinfurthii, Bruyns 5484. A, flower; B, gynostegium; C, gynostegium with one corona lobe removed; D, half flower;
E, pollinarium. Scale bars; A. 6 mm; B. 3 mm; C, D. 2 mm (at C); E, 0.5 mm.
168
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
FIGURE 15. — Pachycarpus schweinfurthii , Bruyns 5484 , in habitat.
the base of the guide rail so they have probably been
missed. They are clearly visible in Figure 14C, each lobe
divided into two narrow, widely diverging teeth encircling
the base of the guide rail.
Part of key taken from Smith ( 1988)
19a Guide rail (anther wings) 1. 3-2.4 mm long with ± straight
margin P. natalensis
19b Guide rail 3. 0-7. 2 mm long with concave margin:
20a Flower rotate-campanulate, corolla lobes spreading but
curved inwards in upper half P. schweinfurthii
20b Corolla lobes reflexed:
20ba Keel of corona lobe taller than broad P. reflectens
20bb Keel of corona lobe not taller than broad . . P appendiculatus
Plant to 450 mm tall, consisting of 1 -several ascending
stems, all parts stiffly pubescent except where indicated oth-
erwise (Figure 15). Stems 3-5 mm thick. Leaf 30-10 x 20-50
mm, ovate to ovate-lanceolate, apex rounded, base truncate
to cordate, green with many prominent parallel veins, petiole
4—10 mm long. Peduncle 20-55 mm long, ± 2 mm thick,
bearing 4—10 ± simultaneously opening flowers, bracts nar-
rowly lanceolate, 6-14 mm long, pedicels 15-18 mm x
1.0-1. 5 mm thick. Sepals 10-12 x 2-3 mm (at base), wid-
ening very slightly above base then lanceolate, pubescent
below, glabrous above. Corolla 30-35 mm diam., rotate-
campanulate; lobes 15x9 mm, ovate, finely pubescent out-
side and on one margin, glabrous within, white suffused with
reddish outside, inside white with conspicuous greyish red
veining. Gynostegium 14-15 mm across; outer corona lobes
minute, bifid and spreading adpressed to base of guide rails;
inner corona lobes ascending, ± 7 mm long, exceeding
height of style-head, with keel 2 mm tall, just equalling style-
head, keel and pail below it white, part above keel pinkish
red.
Specimens examined
NAMIBIA. — 1917 (Tsumeb), Otavi Mountains, (-DB), Bruyns 5484
(BOL, K). 1920 (Tsumkwe): (-BC), Strohbach 1268 (WIND).'
6. SCHIZOGLOSSUM E. Mey. sensu lato in Namibia
During recent expeditions to the northern parts of Na-
mibia several plants belonging to the former genus Schi-
zoglossum have been collected. These have proved very
difficult to identify to species level and information on
these collections is presented here in the hope that they
may add to the knowledge of the group. This group was
worked on extensively by Kupicha (1984) who, following
Bullock (1952), resurrected the genus Aspidoglossum E.
Mey. and created a new genus Miraglossum Kupicha as
well as concurring with Bullock’s resurrection of
Stenostelma Schltr. and Glossostelma Schltr. However, she
provided no keys to all these genera and various lengthy
diagnoses have to be perused to sift out the salient details
for identifications.
In Kolberg et al. (1992) various species were left er-
roneously in Schizoglossum with Kupicha cited as the
authority for this. In fact she placed S. baumii Schltr.
ex N.E. Br. under Aspidoglossum masaicum (N.E. Br.)
Kupicha (not S. bidens subsp. atrorubens (Schltr.)
Kupicha) and S. pentheri Schltr. tentatively under Aspi-
doglossum erubescens (Schltr.) Bullock so that Schizo-
glossum sensu stricto is not known in Namibia. Never-
theless, I have included it in the key which follows.
The differentia that Kupicha (1984) gives for Steno-
stelma seem to me to have so much overlap with the
other genera that I have reverted to the shape of the
style-head to separate this genus from the others as
Schlechter (1894) originally did: this works for S. cap-
ense but may cause problems with the other species
tentatively assigned to this genus by Kupicha.
Key to genera of the Schizoglossum complex in Namibia
la Style-head conical, anther appendages much exceeding style-
head connivent in centre and hiding it entirely, caudicles
conspicuously angled, broadly attached to corpusculum .
Stenostelma
lb Style-head flat with slight depression in centre, anther append-
ages adherent to sides of apex and not covering it, caudi-
cles not conspicuously angled with narrow attachment to
corpusculum:
2a Inflorescences pedunculate, pollinia medially attached to
caudicle with germinating mouth on outer side
Schizoglossum
2b Inflorescences sessile, pollinia subapically attached usually
without germinating mouth, if this is present then lo-
cated at point of attachment of pollinium to caudicle:
3a Corona lobes fleshy, pollinia without germinating mouth
Miraglossum
3b Corona lobes thin, pollinia often with germinating mouth
Aspidoglossum
6.1 Aspidoglossum carinatum ( Schltr ) Kupicha
The taxon illustrated in Figure 16 keys out in Huber
(1967) as Schizoglossum pentheri. In Kupicha (1984) one
arrives at Aspidoglossum carinatum (Schltr.) Kupicha rather
than A. erubescens which is where she tentatively placed S.
pentheri in synonymy. The pollinium lacks the conspicuous
germinating zone supposedly typical of A. erubescens and
so we are unlikely to be dealing with that species.
According to Kupicha (1984: 640), A. carinatum oc-
curs in the eastern Cape Province and Natal. The present,
rather exceptional extension of its distribution into north-
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
169
em Namibia stretches credibility somewhat. In addition,
the corona does not correspond very exactly with that of
A. carinatum : the ventral appendage of the corona is slen-
der and much exceeds the apical process (not broadly tri-
angular). However, there appears to be nowhere else to
place this collection and since the taxonomy of this whole
group remains such a mess, I would prefer to avoid de-
scribing new taxa which might further confound the situa-
tion.
It should be observed that the stem here is uniformly
finely pubescent all round and the leaves are pubescent
on the ventral surface and glabrous on the dorsal except
for the pubescent midrib (Figure 16F). Unless damaged,
the plant always consists of a simple, slender, erect stem
up to 300 mm tall with narrow leaves and many small
clusters of nearly sessile flowers. There is a small, neat,
carrot-like tuber just beneath the surface of the soil (one
excavated was ± 60 mm long and 10 mm broad at apex).
Specimen examined
NAMIBIA. — 1917 (Tsumeb): Otavi Mountains, (-DB), Bruyns 5488
(BOL).
6.2 Schizoglossum saccatum Bruyns , sp. nov., a
ceteris speciebus pilis longis densis in lobis corollae et
lobis coronae crassioribus processa apicale horizontale
breve discedit. Typus: Namibia, 1813 (Opuwo), south of
Kaoko Otavi, (-DD), 1 400 m, Bruyns 5558 (BOL, holo.;
K, WIND, iso.).
Plant much branched at ground level from an under-
ground rootstock, with milky latex. Stems 70-200 x
1. 5-2.0 mm, ascending, hairy all round, intemodes 7-25
mm long. Leaves 20-70 x 2.5-4.0 mm, narrowly linear,
sessile, ventral surface pilose, dorsal glabrous except on
midrib, margins recurved, acute at apex and at base. Flow-
ers in fascicles mostly of 4 arising alongside all except
the basal nodes; peduncle 7-20 x ± 1 mm, pilose along
one side only, with several filiform bracts up to 3 mm
long at apex; pedicel 7-9 mm long, about 0.5 mm thick,
pilose. Sepals dorsally pilose, ventral surface glabrous,
4-5 x 1 mm (at base), lanceolate, usually recurved to-
wards apex, green. Corolla divided right to base; lobes
6.0 x 2.5 mm (at base), ovate-lanceolate, ascending-
spreading with recurved margins and apex, dorsal sur-
face glabrous, ventral surface convex and densely
white-pilose especially towards apex with hairs up to
1 .5 mm long, green with faint longitudinal purplish
stripes. Gynostegium 2.0 x 5.5 mm, glabrous, white ex-
cept for purplish pink dorsal apex; outer corona lobes
minute, truncate-emarginate, beneath guide rails; inner
lobes massive, inflated, ± ovoid when viewed from above
with small apical process projecting horizontally onto an-
ther appendage and broad rounded dorsal process. Fruit
and seed not seen. Figure 17.
FIGURE 16. — Aspidoglossum carinatum , Bruyns 5488. A, plant, much reduced in length (up to 450 mm tall); B, flower; C, gynostegium; D. half
flower; E, pollinarium; F, cross-section of leaf taken near middle showing distribution of thickened hairs. Scale bars; A, 10 mm; B. C, F, 1
mm (at B); D, 0.5 mm; E, 0.25 mm.
170
Bothalia 25,2 ( 1995)
FIGURE 1 7. — Schizoglossum saccatum, Bruyns 5558. A, portion of plant; B, flower; C, face view of part of corona; D, gynostegium with one corona
lobe removed; E, half flower; F, pollinarium. Scale bars: A, 10 mm; B, 2 mm; C, D, 1 mm (at D); E, 1 mm; F, 0.25 mm.
This species is only provisionally placed under Schi-
zoglossum with which it shares the pedunculate inflores-
cence but, if Kupicha’s (1984) sense of the genus is
applied, little else. In Miraglossum , where the fleshy co-
rona lobes and lack of germinating mouth on the pollinia
suggest it might belong, it would be a very odd bedfellow
with the other species of this small, compactly distributed
genus: as Kupicha (in litt.) points out, most of them have
whorled leaves in the flowering part of the stem, sessile
inflorescences and pollinia attached to the caudicle some-
what on their inner side rather than apically as in this new
species. It also seems that the fleshiness of the corona
lobes exceeds anything known in Miraglossum. D. Goyder
at Kew has tried to match it with existing material or
existing genera without success.
Plants were common among limestone chunks in a flat
Sesamothamnus- dominated area, growing with a small
spiny Euphorbia and many other succulents. They are
generally small and inconspicuous and, once the grass be-
gins to grow, are probably difficult to find.
6.3 Stenostelma capense Schltr.
This species seems to be widespread but relatively un-
common in northern Namibia. Schlechter (1894) based
Stenostelma on the conical shape of the style-head. From
the half flowers shown here (compare Figure 18H with
Figure ID) it can be seen that the style-head is indeed
differently shaped to that typical amongst the genera As-
clepias , Gomphocarpus, P achy carpus and Schizoglossum.
The anther appendages are also much more conspicuous.
Instead of being adpressed to the edge of the pentagonal
style-head they here only touch the edge, rise up and are
connivent in the centre, in so doing hiding the entire style-
head from view.
In the material illustrated here the stems are pilose in
a longitudinal band on one side (the side changing after
each node) and are not pilose all round as given by Huber
(1967). On the other hand the corolla lobes are papillate
all over the inner surface and not glabrous as Schlechter
described them. The very tiny outer corona lobes consist
of a single, erect tooth beneath the guide rail (Figure 18G).
Specimens examined
NAMIBIA. — 1918 (Grootfontein): Gobis Water, (-AC), Bruyns 5499
(BOL). 1920 (Tsumkwe): 15 km southeast of Tsumkwe, (-DA), Bruyns
5834 (BOL).
7. Stigmatorhynchus hereroensis Schltr.
The genera of the Marsdenieae are so poorly known
that every attempt should be made to obtain and publish
information on them so that an eventual re-assessment of
the tribe is possible.
S. hereroensis is common and fairly widespread in the
northern portion of Namibia usually growing in areas with
much surface limestone. The distribution (Figure 19,
Bothalia 25,2 (1995) 171
FIGURE 18. — Stenostelma capense, Bruyns 5834. A, part of plant: stem virtually glabrous in patch below insertion of each petiole, peduncle only
hairy on upper side. Flowers produced in dense, simultaneously opening clusters on several such peduncles towards apex of stem; B. C, flower;
D, flower with sepals removed; E, flower with two corolla lobes excised; F, gynostegium; G, gynostegium with two corona lobes removed;
H, half flower (small oval area demarked inside cut corona lobe is hollow); I, pollinarium; J, cross-section of leaf, taken near middle. Scale
bars: A, 2 mm; B-E, J, 1 mm (at B); F-H, 0.5 mm (at G); I, 0.25 mm.
drawn up from material in WIND and BOL) seems to be
bounded to the north and east by regions covered with
deep Kalahari sand but it remains possible that it extends
into Angola and Botswana. Plants often grow in the open
but may also be found growing inside other bushes. They
are usually heavily grazed.
S. hereroensis is a shrub-forming species. Plants usu-
ally form a rigid, round bushlet up to about 300 mm tall
but, if sheltered, may reach 1 m in height, although they
never show any tendency to climb. The grey, woody stems
contain a milky latex.
Plants bear small white flowers in nearly sessile, si-
multaneously opening clusters along the stems. Within
each flower is a dense beard of whitish hairs, beginning
on the lobes, extending into the tube and blocking the
throat of the tube. Peculiar to this species (to the genus?)
is the very long, cylindrical style-head which protrudes
slightly from the tube, and the pair of ovules in each carpel.
One of these ovules seems to abort as each pod contains
only a single, quite large seed. The pods may be paired or
solitary and when paired are divergent from one another at
about 120°. The pollinia are very small and attached by long,
slender caudicles to the small corpusculum (Figure 20).
Schlechter (1914) placed three species in Stigma-
torhynchus , of which the other two, S. umbelliferus (K.
Schum.) Schltr. and S. stelostigma (K. Schum.) Schltr.
(from Tanzania and Somalia respectively) are unknown
FIGURE 19. — Distribution of Stigmatorhynchus hereroensis in Na-
mibia (from records in WIND, BOL).
172
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
FIGURE 20. — Stigmatorhynchus hereroensis, Bruyns 5833. A, portion of plant with paired follicles; B, flower; C, dissected flower; D, gynostegium;
E, half flower, each carpel has two ovules; F, pollinarium with caudicles stretched out. Scale bars: A, 10 mm; B. 2 mm; C, 1 mm; D, 0.5
mm; E, 0.5 mm; F, 0.25 mm.
to me. Bullock (1954) transferred S. stelostigma back to
Marsdenia R. Br. so that, at present, Stigmatorhynchus
contains only two species. It should be noted that
Schlechter’s illustration (1914) is not very accurate: the
pollinaria are very different to what he has shown and the
style head maintains a roughly equal diameter right to the
apex, where it may sometimes be bifid.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I wish to thank A. Nicholas and D.J. Goyder for useful
information on members of the Asclepiadeae, where my
knowledge is patchy. The Curators of WIND and PRE
are thanked for the loan of material.
REFERENCES
AITON, W.T. 1810-1813. Hortus kewensis, edn 2. London.
BROWN, N.E. 1 902- 1 904. Asclepiadaceae. Flora of tropical Africa 4, 1 :
231-503.
BROWN. N.E. 1907-1909. Asclepiadaceae. Flora capensis 4, 1:
518-1036.
BRUYNS, RV. 1984. Ceropegia, Brachystelma and Tenaris in South
West Africa. Dinteria 17: 3-80.
BRUYNS, P.V. 1985. Notes on Ceropegias of the Cape Province.
Bradleya 3: 1-47.
BRUYNS, P.V. 1988. A revision of the genus Echidnopsis Hook. f.
Bradleya 6: 1^-8.
BRUYNS P.V. 1993. A revision of Hoodia and Lavrania. Botanische
Jahrbiicher 115: 145-270.
BRUYNS, P.V. & FORSTER, P.l. 1989. Ceropegia cumingiana Decne.
Austrobaileya 3:7-11.
BULLOCK, A. A. 1952. Notes on African Asclepiadaceae I. Kew Bulletin
1952: 405-426.
BULLOCK, A. A. 1953. Notes on African Asclepiadaceae III. Kew Bul-
letin 1953: 329-362.
BURMAN, N.L. 1768. Flora indica: cui accedit series zoophytorum
indicorum nec non prodromus florae capensis'. 7. Amsterdam,
Leiden.
DIETRICH, D.N.F. 1839-1852. Synopsis plantarum. Voigt, Weimar.
DYER, R.A. 1975. The genera of southern African flowering plants 1.
Government Printer, Pretoria.
DYER, R.A. 1980. Asclepiadaceae. Flora of southern Africa 27, 4.
Government Printer, Pretoria.
DYER, R.A. 1983. Ceropegia, Brachystelma and Riocreuxia in southern
Africa. Balkema, Rotterdam.
FORSTER, P.l. 1988. Studies in the Australasian Asclepiadaceae. I.
Brachystelma Sims in Australia. Nuytsia 6: 285-294.
HUBER, H.E. 1957. Revision der Gatlung Ceropegia. Memorias da
Sociedade Broteriana 12.
HUBER, H.E. 1967. Asclepiadaceae. Prodromus einer Flora von Siid-
westafrika 114.
JACQUIN, N.J. 1760. Enumeratio systematica plantarum. Haak, Leiden.
KOLBERG, H„ GIESS, W„ MULLER, M.A.N. & STROHBACH, B.
1992. List of Namibian plant species. Dinteria 22.
KUNZE, H. 1982. Morphogenese und Synorganisation des Bestiiubungs-
apparates einiger Asclepiadaceen. Beitrage zur Biologie der Pflan-
zen 56: 133-170.
KUNZE, O. 1 886. Jahrbuch des Koniglichen Botanischen Gartens Berlin
4: 268.
KUP1CHA, F.K.A. 1984. Studies on African Asclepiadaceae. Kew Bulle-
tin 38: 599-672.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum. Stockholm.
LINNAEUS, C. 1771. Mantissa plantarum. Stockholm.
MEYER, E.H.F. 1836-1838. Commentariorum de plantis Africae austra-
lis: 203. Leipzig.
MILLER, P. 1768. The gardener’s dictionary. London.
MULLER, M.A.N. 1984. Brachystelma blepharanthera Huber — redis-
covered after 70 years. Dinteria 17: 81.
NICHOLAS, A. 1982. Taxonomic studies in Asclepias with particular
reference to the narrow-leaved species in southern Africa. M. Sc.
Thesis, University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg.
NICHOLAS, A. & GOYDER, D. 1992. Aspidonepsis, a new southern
African genus. Bothalia 22: 23-35.
PECKOVER, R. 1992. A new species of Brachystelma from Natal. Aloe
29: 56, 57.
PHILLIPS, E. P. 1941. Newly described species and new combinations.
Bothalia 4:41.
SCHINZ, H. 1888. Verhandlungen des Botanischen Vereins Branden-
burg 30.
SCHLECHTER, R. 1894. Beitrage zur Kenntnis siidafrikanischer As-
clepiadaceen. Botanische Jahrbiicher 18 Beiblatt 45: 19.
SCHLECHTER, R. 1895. Asclepiadaceae elliotianae. Journal of Botany
33: 333-339.
SCHLECHTER, R. 1896. Asclepiadaceae. In H. Schinz, Beitrage zur
Kenntnis der Afrikanischen Flora 4. Bulletin de I’Herbier Bois-
sier 4: 450.
SCHLECHTER, R. 1914. Asclepiadaceae africanae. Botanische
Jahrbiicher 51:1 29- 155.
SMITH, D.M.N. 1988. A revision of the genus Pachycarpus in southern
Africa. South African Journal of Botany 54: 399—439.
WILMAN, M. 1946. Preliminary checklist of the flowering plants and
ferns of G rii/ualand West. Deighton Bell, Cambridge.
Bothalia 25,2: 173-181 (1995)
An annotated list of Urediniomycetes (rust fungi) from South Africa 1:
Melampsoraceae and Pucciniaceae, excluding Puccinia and Uromyces
M. VAN REENEN*
Keywords: checklist, new records, taxonomy, Urediniomycetes
ABSTRACT
Up-to-date information is given on the identity, occurrence, nomenclature, host ranges, geographical distribution and
literature references of the Urediniomycetes in South Africa. Species of the family Melampsoraceae and all species of the family
Pucciniaceae other than those in the genera Puccinia Pers. and Uromyces (Link) Unger are listed. New species records since
1945 include the following: Melampsora allii-populina Kleb.. Melampsora coleosporioides Dietel, Melampsora larici-
populina Kleb., Melampsora medusae Thiim., Frommea obtusa-duchesneae (Arthur) Arthur, Hemileia gardeniae-thunbergiae
Maubl. & Roger, Phakopsora gossypii (Arthur) Hirats. f., Uromycladium tepperianum (Sacc.) McAlpine and Tranzschelia
discolor (Fuckel) Tranzschel & M.A. Litv. Although many species of rusts have already been recorded, these are thought to
represent only a small percentage of the rust population in southern Africa. Furthermore, only a small portion of rust specimens
at present housed at PREM have so far been studied. Continued research on this economically important group of fungi is
therefore essential.
UITTREKSEL
Die jongste inligting oor die identiteit. voorkoms, nomenklatuur, gasheerreekse, geografiese verspreiding en literatuur-
verwysings van die Urediniomycetes in Suid-Afrika word gegee, Spesies van die familie Melampsoraceae asook alle spesies
van die familie Pucciniaceae behalwe die van die genusse Puccinia Pers. en Uromyces (Link) Unger word gelys. Nuwe
spesierekords sedert 1945 sluit die volgende in: Melampsora allii-populina Kleb., Melampsora coleosporioides Dietel,
Melampsora larici-populina Kleb., Melampsora medusae Thiim., Frommea obtusa-duchesneae (Arthur) Arthur, Hemilea
gardeniae-thunbergiae Maubl. & Roger, Phakopsora gossypii (Arthur) Hirats. f„ Uromycladium tepperianum (Sacc.) McAlpine
en Tranzschelia discolor (Fuckel) Tranzschel & M.A. Litv. Alhoewel talle spesies reeds aangeteken is, verteenwoordig hulle
vermoedelik slegs ‘n klein persentasie van die roespopulasie van suidelike Afrika; boonop is slegs ‘n klein gedeelte van die
roes-eksemplare wat in PREM gehuisves word, reeds bestudeer. Daarom bly navorsing op hierdie ekonomies belangrike groep
swamme steeds noodsaaklik.
INTRODUCTION
The rust fungi (Urediniomycetes). being obligate plant
parasites, constitute one of the most economically impor-
tant groups of fungi. The rusts in South Africa have been
neglected for some time and our knowledge of the occur-
rence of rust fungi in this country is based largely on the
publication by Doidge (1950). A few subsequent lists of
plant diseases in South Africa (Doidge et al. 1953; Gorter
1977, 1979, 1981. 1982) have provided additional infor-
mation on certain species.
As the records in the National Collection of Fungi rep-
resent mainly early collections up to 1945, catalogued by
Doidge ( 1950), a significant number of new records of gen-
era and species are to be expected. Furthermore, many of
the recorded rusts and their hosts have undergone a change
of name, and several new host records have been reported.
The need for an up-to-date list is therefore evident.
This publication is the first in a series of lists on the
rust fungi recorded for South Africa. It deals with the fam-
ily Melampsoraceae and all genera of the family Puc-
* Former address, to which enquiries should be sent: Mycology Unit,
Biosystematics Division, Plant Protection Research Institute, Private Bag
X 1 34, Pretoria 000 1 .
MS. received: 1993-03-09.
ciniaceae other than Puccinia Pers. and Uromyces (Link)
Unger. These will be dealt with in separate papers, as will
the form-genera Aecidium Pers. and Uredo Pers. The aim
of the present publication is to combine all previous in-
formation in one list. Doidge (1950) included 17 species
under the family Melampsoraceae, 264 species under the
Pucciniaceae and 143 species under the Imperfect rusts.
In this paper nine new species records are added, seven
species previously recorded from South Africa are ex-
cluded as they were based on specimens from outside the
region covered by the present list, five species are placed
in synonymy and one previously incorrectly identified
species is correctly named.
The list covers two families: Melampsoraceae and Puc-
ciniaceae. Species are listed alphabetically. Each name (in
bold type) is given with the relevant literature references,
synonyms (in italics, preceded by =), correct host names
(in italics) and reference to specimens in the National Col-
lection of Fungi (PREM) together with their localities.
Information on the geographical distribution of all species
in South Africa is summarised in Table 1. The geographi-
cal area referred to as South Africa in this publication
includes the Republic of South Africa with the former
Republics of Bophuthatswana, Ciskei, Transkei and
Venda. An alphabetical list with hosts is included in Table
2. An alphabetical list of hosts (Table 3) is also added:
the scientific names are the names listed by the National
174
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
TABLE 1. — Summary of rust distribution in South Africa (1993)
TABLE 2. — Alphabetical list of rusts with hosts
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
175
TABLE 2. — Alphabetical list of rusts with hosts (continued)
TABLE 3. — Alphabetical list of hosts
Acacia
ataxacantha DC.
burkei Benth.
caffra (Thunb.) Willd.
gerrardii Benth. var. gerrardii
hebeclada DC. subsp. hebeclada
karroo Hayne
luederitzii Engl. var. retinens (Sim) J.H. Ross & Brenan
mearnsii De Wild.
mellifera (Vahl) Benth. subsp. detinens (Burch.) Brenan
nigrescens Oliv.
rehmanniana Schinz
robusta Burch, subsp. robusta
saligna (Labill.) Wendl.
sieberiana DC. var. woodii (Burtt Davy) Keay & Brenan
spp.
Agrimonia
bracteata E. Mey. ex C.A. Mey.
procera Wallr.
Albizia
gummifera (J.F. Gmel.) C.A. Sm.
versicolor Welw. ex Oliv.
Ancylanthos fulgides Welw.
Annonaceae undet.
Artabotrys monteiroae Oliv.
Calpumia aurea (Aiton) Benth. subsp. sylvatica (Burch.) Brummitt
Cant hi um
ciliatum (Klotzsch) Kuntze
mundianum Cham. & Schltdl.
orbiculare Good
spp.
Cassia sp.
Cheilanthes viridis (Forssk.) Sw. var. viridis
Clematis
brachiata Thunb.
oweniae Harv.
Clerodendrum
glabrum E. Mey. var. glabrum
sp.
Coffea arabica L.
Croton
gratissimus Burch, var. gratissimus
sylvaticus Hochst.
Dalbergia
armata E. Mey.
sp.
Dichrostachys cinerea (L.) Wight & Arn. subsp. nyassana (Taub.)
Brenan
Dissotis
incana (Naudin) Triana
longicaudata Cogn.
princeps (Kunth) Triana var. princeps
Duchesnea indica (Andrews) Focke
Elephantorrhiza elephantina (Burch.) Skeels
Euclea
lanceolata E. Mey.
natalensis A. DC. subsp. natalensis
schimperi (A. DC.) Dandy subsp. schimperi
Euphorbia
helioscopia L.
heterophylla L.
kraussiana Bemh. var. kraussiana
striata Thunb. var. striata
spp.
Fabaceae undet.
Fadogia
cienkowskii Schweinf.
tetraquetra Krause var. tetraquetra
sp.
Faidherbia albida (Delile) A. Chev.
Ficus
carica L.
cordata Thunb. subsp. salicifolia (Vahl) C.C. Berg.
Gardenia
volkensii K. Schum. subsp. volkensii var. volkensii
thunbergia Thunb.
Gossypium sp.
Grewia
bicolor Juss.
caffra Meisn.
monticola Sond.
occidentalis L.
spp.
Helichrysum sp.
Hewittea sublobata (L. f.) Kuntze
Hypericum
aethiopicum Thunb. subsp. aethiopicum
aethiopicum Thunb. subsp. sonderi (Bredell) N. Robson
lalandii Choisy
Indigofera sp.
Kohautia amatymbica Eckl. & Zeyh.
Linum
africanum L.
usitatissimum L.
Melinis repens (Willd.) Zizka subsp. repens
Millettia grandis (E. Mey) Skeels
Mundulea sericea (Willd.) A. Chev.
Oldenlandia sp.
Ormocarpum trichocarpum (Taub.) Engl.
Pachystigma
latifolium Sond.
pygmaeum (Schltr.) Robyns
Polypodium lycopodioides L.
Populus
alba L.
deltoides Marshall
nigra L. var. italica
wislizenii Sarg.
spp.
Prunus
armeniaca L.
persica (L.) Batsch
salicina Lindl.
Psydrax livida (Hiem) Bridson
Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn
Pygmaeothamnus
pygmaeum (Schltr.) Robyns
zeyheri (Sond.) Robyns var. zeyheri
Rhamnus prinoides L’Her.
176
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
TABLE 3. — Alphabetical list of hosts (continued)
Rhoicissus rhomboidea (E. Mey. & Harv.) Planch.
Ricinus communis L.
Rosa spp.
Rubus
apetalus Poir.
ludwigii Eckl. & Zeyh. subsp. ludwigii
pinnatus Willd.
rigidus Sm.
transvaaliensis Gust
ursinus Cham. & Schltdl.
Rumohra adiantiforme (G. Forst.) Ching
Salix
babylonica L.
mucronata Thunb. subsp. capensis (Thunb.) Immelman
spp.
Securinega virosa (Roxb. ex Willd.) Pax & K. Hoffm.
Senna
petersiana (Bolle) Lock
sinqueana (Delile) Lock
Tephrosia
heckmanniana Harms
macropoda (E. Mey.) Harv. var. macropoda
Tricalysia
capensis (Meisn. ex Hochst.) Sim var. capensis
sonde riana Hiem
Vangueria infausta Burch, subsp. infausta
Vangueriopsis lanciflora (Hiem) Robyns ex Good
Vernonia colorata (Willd.) Drake subsp. colorata
Ziziphus
mucronata Willd. subsp. mucronata
spp.
Botanical Institute (Gibbs Russell et al. 1985, 1987, 1988;
De Wet et al. 1990; Arnold & De Wet 1993).
All publications are listed in which references to rusts
collected in South Africa have been traced. However, ref-
erences to the original descriptions of species first de-
scribed from other countries have been omitted. No
attempt has been made to give a complete bibliography
of literature on the South African rusts.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The assistance of Alice Baxter and Louise Schutte as
well as the encouragement of the staff of the National
Collection of Fungi, Plant Protection Research Institute
are acknowledged. The National Botanical Institute is
thanked for verifying many of the scientific host names.
REFERENCES
ARNOLD, T.H. & DE WET. B.C. 1993. Plants of southern Africa: names
and distribution. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa
No. 62.
BAXTER, J.W. 1 959. A monograph of the genus Uropyxis. Mycologia 5 1 :
210-226.
BRUMMITT, R.K. & POWELL, C.E. 1992. Authors of plant names.
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
BURTT DAVY, .1. 1904. Report of the Government Agrostologist and
Botanist. Report of the Transvaal Department of Agriculture, 1st
July 1 903 to 30th June 1904.
COOKE, M.C. 1880. Exotic fungi. Grevillea 9: 14, 15.
COOKE, M.C. 1882. Exotic fungi. Grevillea 10: 121-130.
CUMMINS, G.B. 1962. Supplement to Arthur's manual of the rusts in
United States and Canada. Hafner, New York.
DE WET, B.C., GERMISHU1ZEN, G„ SCHRIRE, B.D., JORDAAN,
M„ PIENAAR, B.J., WELMAN, W.G.. REID, C., VAN WYK,
C.M.. FISH, L„ IMMELMAN, K.L., VAN ROOY, J„ PEROLD,
S„ TAUSSIG, J„ BARKER. N.P. & GLEN, H.F. 1990. New taxa,
new records and name changes for southern African plants.
Bothalia 20: 249-266.
DIETEL, P. 1894. Die Gattung Ravenelia. Hedwigia 33: 22-69. 367-371 .
DIETEL, P. 1906. Monographic der Gattung Ravenelia Berk. Beihefte
zum Botanischen Centralblatt 20: 343 — 41 3.
DIETEL, P. 1928. Hemibasidii (Ustilaginales und Uredinales). Die nadir-
lichen Pflanzenfamilien 2 Auflage, Band 6: 1-98.
DOIDGE, E.M. 1927. Preliminary study of the South African rust fungi.
Bothalia 2: 1-228.
DOIDGE, E.M. 1939. South African rust fungi. Part III. Bothalia 3:
487-512.
DOIDGE, E.M. 1941. South African rust fungi. Part IV. Bothalia 4:
229-236.
DOIDGE, E.M. 1948. South African rust fungi, Part V. Bothalia 4:
895-918.
DOIDGE, E.M. 1950. South African fungi and lichens to the end of 1945.
Bothalia 5: 393^470.
DOIDGE, E.M. & BOTTOMLEY, A.M. 1931. A revised list of plant
diseases occurring in South Africa. Memoirs of the Botanical
Sur\’ey of South Africa No. 1 1 .
DOIDGE, E.M., BOTTOMLEY, A.M.. VAN DER PLANK, J.E. &
PAUER, G.D. 1953. A revised list of plant diseases in South
Africa. Union of South Africa Department of Agriculture, Science
Bulletin 162.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., REID, C„ VAN ROOY, J. & SMOOK. L. 1985.
List of species of southern African plants. Edn 2, Part 1 . Cryp-
togams, Gymnosperms, Monocotyledons. Memoirs of the Botani-
cal Survey of South Africa No. 5 1 .
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., WELMAN, W. G„ GERMISHUIZEN, G„
RETIEF, E„ PIENAAR. B.J., REID, C„ FISH, L., VAN ROOY,
J„ VAN WYK, C.M., KALAKE, C. M. & STAFF 1988. New
taxa, new records and name changes for southern African plants.
Bothalia 18: 293-324.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., WELMAN, W.G.. RETIEF, E„ IMMELMAN,
K.L., GERMISHUIZEN, G., PIENAAR, B„ VAN WYK, M. &
NICHOLAS, A. 1987. List of species of southern African plants.
Edn 2, Part 2. Dicotyledons. Memoirs of the Botanical Slavey of
South Africa No. 56.
GORTER, G.J.M. A. 1 977. Index of plant pathogens and the diseases they
cause in cultivated plants in South Africa. Plant Protection Re-
search Institute Science Bulletin 392. Department of Agricultural
Technical Services.
GORTER, G.J.M. A. 1979. An annotated checklist and selected bibliog-
raphy of South African Fungi for the period 1946-1977. Depart-
ment of Agricultural Technical Services, Technical Communication
163.
GORTER, G.J.M. A. 1981. Index of plant pathogens H and the diseases
they cause in wild growing plants in South Africa. Plant Protec-
tion Research Institute Science Bulletin 398. Department of Agri-
culture and Fisheries.
GORTER, G.J.M. A. 1982. Supplement to index of plant pathogens I and
the diseases they cause in cultivated plants in South Africa. Sup-
plement to Science Bulletin 392.
HENNINGS, P. 1903. Fungi africae orientales II. Botanische Jahrbiicher
33: 34-40.
KALCHBRENNER, K. 1882. Fungi Macowaniani. Grevillea 1 1: 18-27.
KALCHBRENNER, K. & COOKE, M.C. 1880. South African fungi.
Grevillea 9: 1 7-34.
KOERNICKE, Fr. 1877. Mykologische Beitrage. Hedwigia 16: 1-3,
17-31,33-40.
MAGNUS, P.W. 1891. Zwei neue Uredineen. Berichte der Deutschen
Botanischen Gesellschaft 1 1 : 91-99.
MAINS, E.B. 1939. The genera Skierka and Ctenoderma. Mycologia 3 1 :
175-190.
MASSEE, G.E. 1892. Notes on exotic fungi in the Royal Herbarium
Kew. Grevillea 21: 1-6.
MEDLEY WOOD, J. 1883. Hemileia vastatrix. Report of the Natal
Botanical Garden 1882-1883: 7, 21, 22.
MEDLEY WOOD, J. 1 906. Coffee and the Hemileia. Report of the Natal
Botanical Garden and Colonial Herbarium 1906: 13-17.
MONOSON, H.L. 1974. The genus Sphaerophragmidium. Mycologia
66: 791-802.
MORRIS, M.J., WINGFIELD, M.J. & WALKER, J. 1988. First report of
a rust on Acacia mearnsii in southern Africa. Transactions of the
British Mycological Society 90: 324—327.
NEL, G.C. 1942. Genera et species lungorum ex Herb. PA. van der Bijl.
Annale van die Universiteit van Stellenbosch 20, A, 2.
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
177
POLE EVANS, I.B. 1907. Report of the acting Botanist and Plant Pa-
thologist. Annual Report of the Transvaal Agricultural Depart-
ment, 1st July 1906 to 30th June 1907.
POLE EVANS. LB. 1908. Report of the Plant Pathologist. Report of the
Transvaal Department of Agriculture, 1st July 1907 to 30th June
1908.
POLE EVANS. LB. 1918. Novitates africanae. Annals of the Bolus Her-
barium 2: 109-111.
SACCARDO, P.A. 1888. Sylloge fungorum 7. (Gasteromycetaceae: Phal-
loideae, Nidulariaceae, Lycoperdaceae. Hymenogasteraceae; Mu-
coraceae, Peronosporaceae, Saprolegniaceae, Entomophthor-
aceae, Chytridiaceae, Protomycetaceae; Myxomycetaceae).
SACCARDO, P.A. 1895. Sylloge fungorum 11. (Supplementum univer-
sale, Pars III).
SACCARDO, P.A. & SACCARDO, D. 1905. Sylloge fungorum 17.
(Supplementum universale. Pars XI: Hymenomycetae-Laboulbe-
niomyceteae).
SACCARDO, P.A. & SYDOW, P. 1890. Sylloge fungorum 14.
SACCARDO, P.A. & TROTTER, A. 1912. Sylloge fungorum 21.
(Hymenomycetae-Protomycetae ).
SACCARDO. P.A. & TROTTER, A. 1925. Sylloge fungorum 23. (Sup-
plementum universale. Pars X: Basidiomyceteae).
SYDOW, H. 1926. Uber einige siidafrikanische Pilze. Annales My-
cologici 24: 265-272.
SYDOW, H. & SYDOW, P. 1910. Fungi africani novi. Botanische
Jahrbiicher 45: 259-265.
SYDOW, H. & SYDOW, P. 1912. Beschreibungen neuer siidafrikanis-
cher Pilze. Annales Mycologici X: 33-45.
SYDOW, H. & SYDOW, P. 1918. Mykologische Mitteilungen. Annales
Mycologici 16: 240-248.
SYDOW, P. 1899. Fungi natalenses. Hedwigia 38: 130-134.
SYDOW, P. & SYDOW, H. 1915. Monographica Uredinearum 3: Puc-
ciniaceae (excl. Puccinia et Uromyces), Melampsoraceae-Zag-
houniaceae-Coleosporaceae.
SYDOW, P. & SYDOW, H. 1924. Monographica Uredinearum 4: Uredi-
neae Imperfectae.
TRANZSCHEL, W.A. & LITVINOV, M.A. 1939. The rust fungi of the
genus Tranzschelia on Prunoideae. Journal de Botanique 24:
247-253.
TRENCH, T.N.. BAXTER. A.P & CHURCHILL, H. 1988. First report
of Melampsora medusae on Populus deltoides in Africa. South
African Forestry Journal 44: 6-8.
VAN DER BIJL, P.A. 1925. Preliminary list of fungi from Knysna and
surroundings in the author’s herbarium. South African Journal of
Science 22: 191-196.
VAN DER BIJL, P.A. 1926. List of fungi recorded from the Pietersburg-
Tzaneen area of Transvaal. South African Journal of Science 23:
285-289.
VERWOERD, L. 1929. A preliminary checklist of diseases of cultivated
plants in the winter rainfall area of the Cape Province. Union of
South Africa Department of Agriculture Science Bulletin 88:
1-28.
WINTER, G. 1885. Exotische Pilze II. Hedwigia 24: 21-35.
CHECKLIST OF RUST FUNGI RECORDED IN SOUTH AFRICA
Host species are listed in italics.
Names of authors of plant names follow Brummitt & Powell ( 1992). All collection numbers given (followed by locality) are PREM numbers (PREM:
National Collection of Fungi), unless preceded by one of the following codes:
S.A.M.: fungus specimens from the South African Museum Herbarium, now incorporated in PREM;
Stell.: specimens from the Mycological Herbarium of the former Stellenbosch-Elsenburg College of Agriculture, now incorporated in PREM;
Van der Byl: specimens from the P.A. van der Bijl Herbarium, now housed at PREM.
Numbers given in square brackets are duplicate numbers for the preceding specimen.
Other codes used:
* specimens cited in Doidge (1950) which could not be located;
** specimens previously recorded for South Africa which fall outside the geographical area of this publication;
• new species record;
+ type specimen;
= synonym.
MELAMPSORACEAE
GENUS COLEOSPORIUM
clematidis Barclay, P. Syd. & Syd. (1915); Doidge (1927, 1950); Dietel
(1928); Doidge et al. (1953); G.J.M. Gorter (1981)
= Caeoma clematidis Thiim.
= Uredo clematidis Berk.
Clematis brachiata Thunb.: 1861 Barberton; 2359 Kentani; 4383,
10160, 20788, 20795 Somerset East; 10580 Natal
Clematis oweniae Harv.: 801, 10581, 11223, 31906* Inanda
hedvotidis Kalchbr. & Cooke (1880); Sacc. (1888); P. Syd. & Syd.
(1915); Doidge (1927, 1950); G.J.M. Gorter (1981)
Kohautia amatymbica Eckl. & Zeyh.: 36, 1256, 1419, 1456, 2194,
6600, 8908. 9692, 23369. 30944 Pretoria; 8910 Bethlehem;
10067 Mooi River; 10156+ Inanda; 14171 without locality;
40997 East Griqualand
Oldenlandia sp.: 32706 Natal
ipomoeae (Schwein.) Burrill. Doidge (1927, 1950); G.J.M. Gorter (1981)
Hewittea sublobata (L. f.) Kuntze: 1598, 2501, 9100 Winkle Spruit;
6633* Isipingo; 9479 Inanda; 12334 Durban
GENUS CRONARTIUM
gilgianum Henn.. Sacc. & P. Syd. (1890); P. Syd. & Syd. (1915); Syd.
& P. Syd. (1918); Doidge (1927, 1950); Nel (1942)
= Cronartium bresadoleanum Henn.
= Crossopsora gilgiana (Henn.) Syd.
= Cronartium bresadoleanum Henn. var. eucleae
Euclea lanceolata E. Mey.: 1737, 1738, 1739 Soutpansberg
Euclea natalensis A. DC. subsp. natalensis: 1606, 1617, 2415. 9496,
32442 Durban; 2509 Winkle Spruit; 6646 Isipingo; 9089, 9115
Kentani; 10630 Natal; 12420 East London; 26006. 32399,
33601 Nelspruit; 22417 Alexandria; 32273 Kruger National
Park; 32410 Sabie; 33487, 35159, 43119 Grahamstown; 33527
Mtunzini; 33597 Entabeni; 41032 Umtentweni
Euclea schimperi (A. DC.) Dandy subsp. schimperi: 12170** [Van der
Byl 1803]; 729 Nelspruit; 1151. 1852, 5620, 18097 Barberton;
1399 Winkle Spruit; 30959, 30960 Kruger National Park
zizyphi Syd. & E.J. Butler. Doidge (1927, 1950)
Ziziphus mucronata Willd. subsp. mucronata: 32724 between Acom-
hoek and Tzaneen; 41983 Lydenburg
Ziziphus spp.: 50573 Ellisras; 50576 Nelspruit; 50696 Kruger National
Park
GENUS MELAMPSORA
aecidioides (see M. populnea)
allii-populina* Kleb.
Populus deltoides Bart, ex Marshall: 43192 Pretoria
coleosporioides* Dietel
Salix babylonica L.: 50566 Grabouw; 50568, 50569 Stellenbosch
helioscopiae G. Winter, Doidge (1927, 1950); G.J.M. Gorter (1981)
Euphorbia helioscopia L.: 41453 Pretoria
Euphorbia heterophylla L.: 29876, 30979, 32278 Pretoria; 32206 Dur-
ban; 33603 Natal; 40167 Tzaneen
Euphorbia kraussiana Bemh. var. kraussiana: 9087 Claridge
178
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
Euphorbia striata Thunb. var. striata: 17035 Mooi River; 29720 Pre-
toria
Euphorbia spp.: 1065 Bethlehem; 1851 Barberton
Euphorbia heterophylla L.: 420711, 44620 Pretoria
hvpericorum G. Winter var. australis Doidge (1927, 1950); G.J.M.
Goiter (1981)
= Melampsora hyperici J. Schrot.
Hypericum aethiopicwn Thunb. subsp. aethiopicum : 30079* Hogsback
Hypericum aethiopicum Thunb. subsp. sonderi (Bredell) N. Robson:
1074 Lydenburg, 1302, 1946, 1988, 9314, 9480*, 9691, 32090*
Pretoria; 10361 Inanda; 12241 Mooi River
Hypericum lalandii Choisy: 10362 Natal
junodii** Doidge (1927, 1950)
Vemonia colorata (Willd.) Drake subsp. colorata: 11723+
larici-populina* Kleb., G.J.M. Gorter (1979, 1982)
= Melampsora populina (Jacq.) Lev.
Populus deltoides Marshall: 43691 Pietermaritzburg; 43694 Pretoria
Populus nigra L. var. italica: 43730 George; 43732 Nelspruit; 43833
Pretoria; 48510 Harding
Populus wislizenii Sarg.: 43731 George
Populus spp.: 43692, 47995 Pietermaritzburg; 43911, 50565 Pretoria;
47559 Stellenbosch; 48496 Witbank; 48497 Bethal; 48511
Greytown
lini (Ehrenb.) Lev., Verwoerd (1929); Nel (1942); Doidge (1950); Doidge
et al. (1953); G.J.M. Gorter (1977, 1981)
Linum africanum L.: 46119 (Stell. 150) Stellenbosch
Lirtum usitatissimum* L.
medusae* Thiim., T.N. Trench, A.P. Baxter & H. Churchill (1988)
= Melampsora albertensis Arthur
= Uredo medusae (Thiim.) Arthur
Populus deltoides Marshall: 48253, 50554, 50555, 50556, 50557 Grey-
town; 48329 Ermelo; 48330 Howick; 48331 Pietermaritzburg;
48332 Piet Retief
Populus sp.: 48499 Vryheid
populnea (Pers.) P. Karst., G.J.M. Gorter (1977)
= Melampsora aecidioides J. Schrot.
Populus alba L.: 537 Cape Town; 7102 Soutpansberg; 23723, 44353
Pretoria
Populus spp.: 639 Cape Town; 71 1 Groot Drakenstein; 724 Cape; 733
Inchanga; 1514 Wellington; 21936 Bloemfontein; 29859 Sout-
pansberg; 30780 Rustenburg; 32141**, 34319, 34419, 36791
Pretoria; 45985 (Stell. 24), 46795 (Stell. 879) Stellenbosch
puccinioides* G. Winter (1885); Sacc. (1888); P. Syd. & Syd. (1915);
Doidge (1950)
Helichrysum sp.
ricini Pass., P. Syd. & Syd. (1915); Van der Byl (1926); Doidge (1927,
1950); Doidge & Bottomley (1931); Nel (1942), Doidge et al.
(1953); G.J.M. Gorter (1977)
= Caeoma ricini Schltdl.
= Uredo ricini Biv.
= Melampsorella ricini (Biv.) De Toni
= Uromyces ricini Biv.
Ricinus communis L.: 55, 7402, 14203, 30968*, 30969 Pretoria; 179
Soutpansberg; 524**; 738 Kenilworth; 1013, 20778 Graham-
stown; 10161 Inanda; 10163, 20783, 20789 Somerset East;
11505 Buffelspoort; 23363 Boulders; 32300 Durban; 32309
Eshowe; 45988 Stellenbosch
vitellinae Thiim., Doidge (1927, 1950); G.J.M. Gorter (1981, 1982),
= Uredo mixta Duby forma salicis-capensis Thiim.
= Melampsora mixta (Schltdl.) J. Schrot.
Salix mucronata Thunb. subsp. capensis (Thunb.) Immelman: 923
Boshoff; 20766* (S.A.M. 33935) Somerset East; 50505 Betty’s
Bay
Salix spp.: 45875 Grahamstown; 50492, 50753 Royal Natal National
Park; 50656 Pretoria
GENUS MILESINA
dieteliana (Syd.) Magnus, P. Syd. & Syd. (1915); Doidge (1927, 1950)
= Milesia polypodii F.B. White
= Melampsorella dieteliana Syd.
Polypodium lycopodioides L.: 1634 Amanzimtoti
nervisequa (Syd.) Faull, P. Syd. & Syd. (1915), Doidge (1927, 1950)
= Milesia nervisequa Syd.
= Caeoma nervisequum Thiim.
sub Uredo filicum Klotzsch
sub Uredo polypodii (Pers.) DC.
Cheilanthes viridis (Forssk.) Sw. var. viridis: 999 Pretoria; 1370 Dur-
ban; 1836 Soutpansberg; 10162 Natal; 20781 Somerset East
Rumohra adiantiforme** (G. Forst.) Ching: S.A.M. 28729
GENUS PUCCINIASTRUM
agrimoniae (Dietel) Tranzschel, P. Syd. & Syd. (1915); Doidge (1927,
1950); Dietel (1928)
= Coleosporium ochraceum Fuckel
sub Phragmidium obtusum C. Tul.
Agrimonia bracteata E. Mey. ex C.A. Mey.: 303 Fort Beaufort; 332
Inanda; 1150, 1202, 1261, 1407, 2147, 6655, 29771, 29814,
29847 Pretoria; 2313 Harrismith; 2353 Kentani; 32284 without
locality; 11638 Lidgetton; 11649 Tweedie; 24351, 20323 Sout-
pansberg; 10157*, 10158. 20777, 20797 Somerset East; 25977
Barberton; 32311 Natal
Agrimonia procera Wallr.: 50762 Cathkin Park, 50731 Uitsoek State
Forest
GENUS UREDINOPSIS
macrosperma (see U. pteridis)
pteridis Dietel & Holw.
= Uredinopsis macrosperma (Cooke) Magnus
Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn; 10590, 11224 Inanda
PUCCINI ACEAE
GENUS CEROTELIUM
fici (Castagne) Arthur, Verwoerd (1929); Doidge (1950); Doidge et al.
(1953)
= Kuehneola fici E.J. Butler
= Uredo fici Castagne
= Physopella fici Arthur
Ficus carica L.: 289 Grahamstown; 615 Constantia; 852 Pieter-
maritzburg; 1207, 25159 Cape; 20726* Cape Town; 1315
Renosterfontein; 46129 [Stell. 161], 46799 [Stell. 882] Stellen-
bosch
Ficus cordata Thunb. subsp. salicifolia (Vahl) C.C. Berg: 176, 1298
Pretoria
gossypii (see Phakopsora desmium)
GENUS DIORCH1D1UM
tricholaenae Syd., Syd. & P. Syd. (1912); Sacc. & Trotter (1925);
Doidge (1927, 1950); Doidge & Bottomley (1931)
Melinis repens (Willd.) Zizka subsp. repens: 269*+, 586 Barberton;
1449 Harden Heights, 1605, 2393, 2512 Winkle Spruit; 1607,
1608 Amanzimtoti; 20631 Natal; 30138 Nelspruit; 30292
Ndwedwe; 30974 Estcourt
woodii Kalchbr. & Cooke in Kalchbr. (1882); Sacc. (1888); Magnus
(1891 ); Doidge ( 1927, 1950); Dietel (1928); Doidge & Bottomley
(1931)
= Puccinia woodii (Kalchbr. & Cooke) Syd.
Millettia grandis (E. Mey.) Skeels: 335+, 10448+, 10449+, 22090 Ton-
gaat; 1593, 1978, 2515 Winkle Spruit; 1601 Amanzimtoti, 5606
Port Shepstone; 11893 Umkomaas
GENUS ENDOPHYLLUM
macowanii Pole Evans (1907, 1908); P. Syd. & Syd. (1924); Van der
Byl (1925, 1926); Doidge (1927, 1950); Nel (1942)
= Aecidium elegans Dietel
= Aecidium rhamni Pers. forma rhamni-prinoides
sub Puccinia coronata Corda
Rhamnus prinoides L’Her.: 379, 171 14 George; 1772, 17738, Sout-
pansberg; 2097 Kentani; 2418, 17215 Knysna; 4275, 20735,
20761 Somerset East; 33152 Donny brook
GENUS FROMMEA*
obtusa-duchesneae* (Arthur) Arthur
= Frommea obtusa (F. Strauss) Arthur
= Frommea obtusa (F. Strauss) Arthur var. duchesneae Arthur
Duchesnea indica (Andrews) Focke: 48512 Greytown; 48609, 48610
Pretoria; 50482 Cathkin Park
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
179
obtusa var. duchesneae (see F. obtusa-duchesneae)
GENUS HAMASPORA
longissima (Thiim.) Korn. (1877); Massee (1892); P. Syd. & Syd. (1915);
Doidge (1927, 1950); Dietel (1928); Doidge & Bottomley (1931 );
Doidge et al. (1953)
= Uredo lucida Thiim.
= Phragmidium longissimum Thiim.
Rubus ludwigii Eckl. & Zeyh. subsp. ludwigii : 9776 Spitskop; 27562
between Rested and Clarens; 32303 Durban
Rubus pinnatus Willd.: 1620 Winter’s Kloof; 2350 Kentani; 2404 Cra-
mond; 30375 Donnybrook
Rubus rigidus Sm.: 144, 1825 Soutpansberg; 2351 Kentani; 5161
Komgha; 8387 Pretoria; 10589, 11055, 11205 Inanda; 20721,
20723*, 20742*, 20746* [S.A.M. 28746] Somerset East; 22413
East London; 26051 Barberton; 32741 Rustenburg
Rubus transvaaliensis Gust: 1267, 1379*, 1380, 1513, 1535*, 1891*.
1914, 1949, 2184, 6656, 6657, 6898, Pretoria; 20333 Sout-
pansberg; 26016 Barberton
Rubus spp.: 29753 Pretoria; 33385 Grahamstown; 46490 [Stell. 561] Cape
Town; 46955 [Stell. 1033] Stellenbosch; 50489 Cathkin Park
GENUS HEMILEIA
aneylanthi** Syd.. P. Syd. & Syd. (1915); Doidge (1927, 1950)
= Uredo aneylanthi Henn.
Ancylanthos fulgides Welw.
canthii Berk. & Broome, P. Syd. & Syd. (1915); Doidge (1927, 1950);
G.J.M. Gorter (1981)
= Coleosporium detergibile Thiim.
= Uredo detergibilis Henn.
Canthium ciliatum (Klotzsch) Kuntze: 20779, 33918 [S.A.M. 33918]
Somerset East
Canthium mundianum Cham. & Schltdl.: 50861 Sandton
Canthium orbiculare** Good
Canthium sp.: 9084 Wyebank
Psydrax livida** (Hiem) Bridson
evansii Syd., Syd. & P. Syd. (1912), P. Syd. & Syd. (1915), Sacc. &
Trotter (1925), Doidge (1927, 1950)
Tricalysia sonderiana Hiem: 6635 Umbogintwini
Tricalysia capensis (Meisn. ex Hochst.) Sim. var. capensis : 590**
fadogiae Syd., Syd. & P. Syd. (1912); P. Syd. & Syd. (1915); Sacc. &
Trotter (1925); Doidge (1927, 1950); G.J.M. Gorter (1981)
Fadogia cienkowskii Schweinf.: 757**, 7391 Nelspruit
Fadogia tetraquetra Krause var. tetraquetra : 34482 Pietersburg
Fadogia** sp.
Pygmaeothamnus pygmaeum (Schltr.) Robyns: 48608 Nelshoogte State
Forest
Pygmaeothamnus zeyheri (Sond.) Robyns var. zeyheri: 281+ Heidel-
berg; 2209, 12229, 26376, 34218 Pretoria; 21232 Newcastle;
28811* Waterberg; 42421 Welverdiend
gardeniae-thunbergiae* Maubl. & Roger
Gardenia thunbergia** Thunb.
Gardenia volkensii K. Schunt. subsp. volkensii var. volkensii: 50708
Kruger National Park
Gardenia* sp.
scholzii Syd., Syd. & P. Syd. (1910); P. Syd. & Syd. (1915); Doidge
(1927, 1950)
= Uredo scholzii Henn.
Clerodendrum glabrum E. Mey. var. glabrum: 1569, 1570 Amanzimtoti
Clerodendrum** sp.
vastatrix Berk. & Broome. J.M. Wood (1883, 1906); P. Syd. (1899);
Burtt Davy (1904); Pole Evans (1907); P. Syd. & Syd. (1915);
Van der Byl (1926); Doidge (1927, 1950); Doidge & Bottomley
(1931); G.J.M. Gorter (1977, 1981)
= Uredo gardeniae-thunbergiae Henn.
Coffea arabica L.: 5, 42, 59, 172, 20322 Tzaneen; 323, 349 Natal; 372
Durban; 409 Pretoria; 991 Lemana; 1403 Winkle Spruit; 6824,
7788 Verulam; 20857 Rietvlei; 21933 Lydenburg; 23142 Louis
Trichardt; 23498 Potchefstroom; 24344* Duiwelskloof; 24941
Pinetown; 25469, 30936* Umbogintwini
woodii Kalchbr. & Cooke (1880); Sacc. (1888); Burtt Davy (1904); J.M.
Wood (1906): Pole Evans (1907), P. Syd. & Syd. (1915); Van der
Byl (1926); Doidge (1927, 1950); Nel (1942); G.J.M. Gorter
(1981)
= Uredo vangueriae Cooke
Pachystigma latifolium Sond.: 173 without locality; 340, 10600, 11185
Inanda, 814, 10549, 10599*, 32021* Natal; 1404, 5640 Winkle
Spruit; 6835 Scottburgh; 8250 Krantzkloof; 9762 New Hano-
ver; 14177 Entumeni; 24940 Brighton Beach
Pachystigma pygmaeum (Schltr.) Robyns: 30909 White River
Vangueria infausta Burch, subsp. infausta: 324, 352, 10410 Natal; 1154,
1277, 1278 Barberton; 1679 Table Mountain; 1815 Sout-
pansberg; 2446 Cramond; 2497 Winkle Spruit; 11845 Louis
Trichardt; 14104*; 30941 Inanda; 32403, 50733 Nelspruit
Vangueriopsis lanciflora** (Hiem) Robyns ex Good
GENUS KUEHNEOLA
albida (see K. uredinis)
uredinis (Link) Arthur, G.J.M. Gorter (1977, 1981)
= Kuehneola albida (J.G. Kiihn) Magnus
Rubus apetalus Poir.: 1532 Lydenburg
Rubus rigidus Sm.: 1863 Barberton; 32287 without locality
Rubus transvaaliensis Gust: 642 Barberton; 992 Wellington; 2417
Knysna; 33173 Pietermaritzburg
Rubus ursinus Cham. & Schltdl.: 46001 Stellenbosch [Stell. 39; Van
der Byl 1101], This specimen was previously wrongly identified
as Phragmidium violaceum (C.F. Schultz) G. Winter.
Rubus spp.: 681 Cape Town; 6931 Stellenbosch; 18087 Pretoria; 32125
Knysna; 50483 Cathkin Park
GENUS MASSEEELLA
flueggeae Syd., Doidge (1939, 1950); G.J.M. Gorter (1981)
= Uredo brideliae (Henn. & Pole Evans) Doidge
= Aecidium brideliae Henn. & Pole Evans
Securinega virosa (Roxb. ex Willd.) Pax & K. Hoffm.: 77 Nelspruit;
25968, 26359 Barberton
GENUS PHAKOPSORA*
desmium (see P. gossypii)
gossypii (Arthur) Hirats. f., Cummins (1962)
= Phakopsora desmium (Berk. & Broome) Cummins
Gossypium sp.: 23190 Natal
GENUS PHRAGMIDIUM
disciflorum (see P. mucronatum)
mucronatum Fr.
= Phragmidium disciflorum (Tode) J. James
Rosa spp.: 139 Kimberley; 141, 1171, 1212, 1892, 32830 Pretoria; 421
Bloemfontein; 484**; 787* Durban; 1866 Wellington; 2430
Uniondale; 9310 Kentani; 15041* Port Elizabeth; 28521 Fort
Beaufort; 34257**; 46022 Stellenbosch
violaceum (R. Schultz) G. Winter (This specimen was wrongly identified
and is now filed under Kuehneola uredinis. Phragmidium vio-
laceum has not been collected in South Africa.)
GENUS PUCCINIOSIRA
dissotidis* Wakef., P. Syd. & Syd. (1924); Doidge (1927, 1950)
= Aecidium dissotidis Cooke
= Uredo dissotidis Cooke, l.c.
= Uredo dissotidisdongicaudae Henn.
Dissotis incana (Naudin) Triana: 10288, 11194 Natal
Dissotis longicaudata** Cogn.
Dissotis princeps (Kunth) Triana var. princeps: 10289 Natal
GENUS RAVENELIA
atrides Syd., Syd. & P. Syd. (1912); P. Syd. & Syd. (1915); Dietel
(1928); Sacc. & Trotter (1925); Doidge (1927, 1948. 1950)
= Dasturella atrides Thirum.
Grewia bicolor Juss.: 32731 Kruger National Park
Grewia caffra Meisn.: 1630, 1670+, 2534 Durban
Grewia monticola Sond.: 32401 Nelspmit
Grewia occidentalis L.: 1629 Amanzimtoti
Grewia spp.: 5075, 5076 Kruger National Park
baumiana Henn. ( 1903); Dietel ( 1906); Sacc. & D. Sacc. (1905); P. Syd.
& Syd. (1915); Doidge (1927, 1948, 1950)
= Haploravenelia baumiana (Henn.) Syd.
Senna petersiana (Bolle) Lock: 29870 Rooiwal; 30955 Schagen; 32404
Nelspmit; 50553 Hanglip State Forest
Senna singueana (Delile) Lock: 6886**+
180
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
bottomleyae** Doidge (1927, 1950)
Albizia versicolor Welw. ex Oliv.: 14166
deformans** (Maubl.) Dietel (1906); P. Syd. & Syd. (1915); Sacc. &
Trotter (1912); Doidge (1927, 1950)
= Pleoravenelia deformans Maubl.
= Cystingophora deformans (Maubl.) Syd.
Acacia sp.
dichrostachydis Doidge (1927, 1950)
Dichrostachys cinerea (L.) Wight. & Am. subsp. nyassana (Taub.)
Brenan: 6806, 7106 Verulam
elephantorrhizae Doidge (1927, 1950)
Elephantorrhiza elephantina (Burch.) Skeels: 8955+, 12225, 12841,
23453 Pretoria; 23359 Enselberg; 29732* Donkerpoort
escharoides Syd., Syd. & P. Syd. (1912); P. Syd. & Syd. (1915); Sacc.
& Trotter (1925); Doidge (1927, 1950); G.J.M. Gorter (1981)
Faidherbia albida ** (Delile) A. Chev.
Acacia burkei Benth.: 534+ Potgietersrus; 10086 Springbok Flats;
20654 Naboomspruit; 27586 Hartebeespoort; 29918 Pienaar’s
River; 50690 Kruger National Park
Acacia nigrescens Oliv.; 50691, 50695 Kruger National Park
evansii Syd., Syd. & P. Syd. (1912); P. Syd. & Syd. (1915); Sacc. &
Trotter (1925); Doidge (1927, 1939, 1950); G.J.M. Gorier (1981)
= Dendroecia evansii Syd.
Acacia gerrardii Benth. var. gerrardii: 30127 Verulam
Acacia rehmanniana Schinz: 5625 Pretoria
Acacia robusta Burch, subsp. robusta: 123, 149, 2 1 8 1 +, 2212, 5175,
6588, 6698, 14144 Pretoria; 1316 Magalies River; 6807, 7105
Verulam; 18085 Loskop; 28954 Magaliesberg; 29933 Wolma-
ransstad; 30124 Umzinto; 50693 Kruger National Park
Acacia sieberiana DC. var. woodii (Burn Davy) Keay & Brenan: 2539+
Estcourt
Acacia spp.: 2403 Cramond; 11670 Pretoria; 33171 Johannesburg
glabra Kalchbr. & Cooke (1880), Cooke (1880); Dietel (1894, 1906); P.
Syd. & Syd. (1915); Doidge (1927, 1950)
sub Ravenelia slictica Berk. & Broome
Calpumia aurea (Aiton) Benth. subsp. sylvatica (Burch.) Brummitt:
2320, 2330, 5165 Kentani; 2375+, 10696+, I0698+, 20728+,
20732+, 20727, 20728*+, 20851 [S.A.M. 28754] Somerset East
halsei Doidge (1939, 1950)
Acacia ataxacantha DC.: 30117+ Ndwedwe; 50571, 50748 Nelspruit
indigoferae** Tranzschel, Dietel (1894); P. Syd. & Syd. (1915); Doidge
(1927, 1950)
sub Ravenelia laevis Dietel & Holw.
Indigofera sp. 15513 Harare, Zimbabwe
inornata Dietel (1894, 1906); Sacc. (1895); P. Syd. & Syd. (1915);
Doidge (1927, 1950); G.J.M. Gorter (1981)
= Aecidium inomatum Kalchbr.
= Cystotelium inomatum (Dietel) Syd.
= Haploravenelia inornata Dietel
Acacia karroo Hayne: 2368 Kentani; 2377+, 4262*+, 20734+ Somerset
East; 2368*, 2541 Komgha; 22375 Kirkwood; 26396 Graham-
stown
le-testui** Maubl., Dietel (1906); Sacc. & Trotter ( 1912); P. Syd. & Syd.
(1915); Doidge (1927, 1950)
Cassia sp.
macowaniana Pazschke, Dietel (1894, 1928); Sacc. (1895); P. Syd. &
Syd. (1915); Doidge (1927, 1948, 1950); G.J.M. Gorter (1981)'
= Aecidium omamentale Kalchbr.
= Ravenelia ornamentalis Dietel
= Cephatelium macowanianum (Pazschke) Syd.
Acacia karroo Hayne: 329, 834*, 10299, 13074 Ladysmith; 929
Leeuwdoorns; 1417 Kroonstad; 1524, 2123, 21224, 21225,
23449, 23452, 1985, 2095, 2170, 11857, 2255, 2447, 6665,
23203, 23452*, 24913, 28603, 29817, 29798*, 29916, 30912,
36935, 47473, 50686, 50687, 50688, 50692, 50697, 50701,
50699, 50700, 50711 Pretoria; 1915, 8757 Kentani; 2077
Indwe; 2135 Plat River; 2355 Zwartfontein; 2357, 5154 Vry-
heid; 2376+, 4067+, 20730+, 2073 1+, 20733+ Somerset East;
2423 Trapp’s Valley; 2552 Bathurst; 7367* Butterworth, 7404,
28597, 507(H) Onderstepoort; 8245 Muden; 8857 Queenstown;
10017 Riverton; 1 1002 Springbok Flats; 11300 Bloemfontein;
15453 Klipplaat; 21052* Asbury; 27585 Hartebeespoort; 28505
Friedenheim; 28606 Prieska; 30327 Wolmaransstad; 30971 Est-
court; 31021 Ventersburg; 34583 Witbank; 40653 Soutpansberg;
44332 Mafikeng; 46145 Knysna; 46208 Oudtshoorn; 47474
Schweizer Reinecke; 50757, 50758 50759, 50760 Boeken-
houtskloof; 50762 Ashton Bay
minima Cooke (1882); Sacc. (1888); Dietel (1894, 1906); P. Syd. &
Syd. (1915); Doidge (1927, 1950); Doidge & Bottomley (1931);
G.J.M. Gorter (1981)
Albizia gummifera (Gmel.) C.A. Sm.: 351, 10697+ Inanda; 1835*,
1400, 1582, 2384 Winkle Spruit; 6827 Scottburgh; 30779 Dur-
ban
modesta Doidge (1939, 1948, 1950); G.J.M. Gorter (1981)
Acacia hebeclada DC. subsp. Iiebeclada : 30110+ Pretoria
Acacia luederitzii Engl. var. retinens (Sim) J.H. Ross & Brenan: 34572
between Hammanskraal and Pienaar's River
natalensis Syd. & Pole Evans, Syd. & P. Syd. (1912); P. Syd. & Syd.
(1915); Sacc. & Trotter (1925); Doidge (1927, 1950)
= Longia natalensis (Syd. & Pole Evans) Syd.
= Haploravenelia natalensis (Syd. & Pole Evans) Dietel
Acacia karroo Hayne: 1584+, 1935+, 2514 Winkle Spruit
peglerae Pole Evans (1918); Doidge (1927, 1950); G.J.M. Gorter (1981)
Acacia caffra (Thunb.) Willd.: 2331+, 2367, 5179, 5626 Kentani;
2544* Butterworth; 5150 Weenen
pienaarii Doidge (1927, 1950); G.J.M. Gorter (1981)
Acacia caffra (Thunb.) Willd.: 2449. 5627+, 6658*+, 11508, 23450*,
23448, 23451, 26395, 49454, 51013 Pretoria; 5159 Weenen
pretoriensis Syd., Syd. & P. Syd. (1912); P. Syd. & Syd. (1915); Sacc.
& Trotter (1925); Doidge (1927, 1939, 1950)
Acacia sp.: 1376+ Pretoria
stictica Berk. & Broome, Sacc. & P. Syd. (1890); P. Syd. & Syd. (1915);
Doidge (1927, 1950); G.J.M. Gorter (1981)
= Ravenelia munduleae Henn.
Mundulea sericea (Willd.) A. Chev.: 124, 1522, 13089, 23447, 2210,
2256, 2227, 19842, 29728, 30716, 32667, 41959, 43144, 49376,
50558 Pretoria; 146 Hartebeespoort; 28255 Potgietersrus
tephrosiae Kalchbr., Sacc. (1888); Dietel (1894, 1906); P. Syd. & Syd.
(1915); Doidge (1927, 1950); G.J.M. Gorter (1981)
Tephrosia heckmanniana** Harms
Tephrosia macropoda (E. Mey.) Harv. var. macropoda: 10700 Inanda;
14190 Entumeni
transvaaliensis Doidge (1939, 1950)
Acacia mellifera (Vahl) Benth. subsp. detinens (Burch.) Brenan:
37382+ Pretoria
woodii* Pazschke, Dietel (1894); P. Syd. & Syd. (1915); Sacc. (1895);
Doidge ( 1927, 1950)
Fabaceae undet.
GENUS SCHROETER1ASTER
doidgeae Syd. (1926); Doidge (1927, 1950)
Croton gratissimus Burch, var. gratissimus: 14173 Waterberg
stratosus (Cooke) Syd., P. Syd. & Syd.; Doidge (1927, 1950); Doidge
& Bottomley (1931)
= Melampsora stratosa Cooke
Croton sylvaticus Hochst.: 363 Natal; 2020, 2383, 2500, 5639 Winkle
Spruit; 10363 Inanda; 33093 Eshowe; 35148 Louis Trichardt
GENUS SKIERKA
robusta Doidge (1927, 1950); Mains (1939)
Rhoicissus rhomboidea (E. Mey. ex Harv.) Planch.: 1635+ Durban;
1824 Lemana; 2398 Winkle Spruit, 2416 Umgeni Beach; 6628
Isipingo; 32781 Umhlanga Rocks; 39125 Southport
GENUS SPHAEROPHRAGMIUM
artabotrydis Doidge (1941, 1950); Monoson (1974)
Artabotrys monteiroae Oliv.: 30761+ Westville
dalbergiae Dietel; Kalchbr. ( 1882); Sacc. ( 1895); P. Syd. & Syd. ( 1915);
Doidge (1927, 1950); Monoson (1974)
Dalbergia armata E. Mey: 881*, 2524 Umgeni Lagoon; 1371. 5144
Durban; 6825 Verulam; 30954 Nelspruit; 35147 Empangeni
Dalbergia sp.: 51015 Nelspruit
GENUS UROMYCLADIUM*
tepperianum* (Sacc.) McAlpine. M.J. Morris, M.J. Wingf. & J. Walker
(1988)
Acacia mearnsii De Wild.: 48897 Bainskloof
Acacia saligna (Labill.) J.C. Wendl.: 50659 Stellenbosch
Bothaiia 25,2 (1995)
181
GENUS UROPYXIS
(?)gerstneri Doidge (1927, 1950); J.W. Baxter (1959)
Annonaceae undet.: 34564+ Zululand
This is a doubtful species. Examination revealed characters that place
this species in the genus Diorchidium.
steudneri Magnus var. rhodesica** Doidge (1948, 1950); J.W. Baxter
(1959)
Ormocarpum trichocarpum (Taub.) Engl.: 34032 Inyati, Zimbabwe
GENUS TRANZSCHELIA*
discolor* (Fuckel) Tranzschel & M.A. Litv.; Nel (1942)
= Tranzschelia punctata (Pers.) Arthur
= Tranzschelia pruni-spinosae var. discolor (Fuckel) Dunegan
= Puccinia discolor Fuckel
Primus armeniaca L.: 5593 Graaff-Reinet; 30966 Pretoria
Primus persica (L.) Batsch: 1 Elsenburg; 125 without locality; 290,
321 Fort Beaufort; 7800 Pretoria; 45982, 46791 Stellen-
bosch
Primus salicina Lindi.: 1250 Lake Chrissie; 1290 Bethal; 2378 Gra-
hamstown; 48612 Pretoria
Bothalia 25,2: 183-204(1995)
Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from southern Africa. 9. The genus
Marchantia and its five local species
S.M. PEROLD*
Keywords: distribution, ecology, Hepaticae, Marchantia, M. berteroana, M. debilis, M. paleacea subsp. paleacea, M. pappeana subsp. pappeana, M.
polymorpha subsp. ruderalis, southern Africa, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
In this, the ninth and final article in the series on southern African Marchantiales, a taxonomic account is given of the genus
Marchantia which is locally represented by five species. Two of the three subgenera that are recognized, namely subgenus
Marchantia (with two species, M. polymorpha subsp. ruderalis and M. berteroana ), as well as subgenus Chlamidium (Corda)
Bischl. which is divided into three sections, namely Paleaceae (with M. paleacea subsp. paleacea ), Chlamidium (with M.
pappeana subsp. pappeana ) and Papillatae (with M. debilis ) are treated. The third subgenus, Protomarchantia Schust., is absent
from the region. Corrections need to be made to the Marchantia species given in Magill & Schelpe's (1979) checklist and in
Arnold & De Wet (1993). Descriptions and illustrations of the taxa together with distribution maps, their ecology and a key to
the subgenera and species are provided.
Only traditional taxonomic methods were employed and this treatment closely follows that of Bischler-Causse (1993a), the
recognized world authority on the group. All southern African specimens held at BOL and PRE, as well as a few from other
herbaria have been studied and some new collections have been added. It is shown that M. polymorpha subsp. ruderalis has been
introduced, as it is only known from local nurseries. The presence here of M. paleacea subsp. paleacea is confirmed, although
it is rare. Otherwise little that is new could be added to the exhaustive studies by Bischler-Causse (1993a).
UITTREKSEL
In hierdie, die negende en finale artikel in die reeks oor die Marchantiales van suidelike Afrika, word 'n taksonomiese
verslag gegee oor die genus Marchantia wat plaaslik deur vyf spesies verteenwoordig word. Twee van die drie erkende
subgenusse, nl. subgenus Marchantia (met twee spesies, M. polymorpha subsp. ruderalis en M. berteroana ) sowel as subgenus
Chlamidium (Corda) Bischl. wat verdeel word in drie seksies, nl. Paleaceae (met M. paleacea subsp. paleacea), Chlamidium
(met M. pappeana subsp. pappeana) en Papillatae (met M. debilis), word behandel. Die derde subgenus, Protomarchantia
Schust.. kom nie in die gebied voor nie. Regstellings moet aangebring word aan die Marchantia- spesies soos aangegee in Magill
& Schelpe (1979) se lys en in Arnold & De Wet (1993). Beskrywings en illustrasies van die taksons sowel as verspreidings-
kaarte, die ekologie en ’n sleutel tot die subgenusse en spesies word verskaf.
Slegs tradisionele taksonomiese metodes is toegepas, en word die werk van Bischler-Causse (1993a), die erkende wereld-
gesaghebbende op die groep, word ten nouste nagevolg in hierdie behandeling. Alle eksemplare uit suidelike Afrika in BOLen
PRE asook ’n paar van ander herbariums is bestudeer en nuwe versamelings is bygevoeg. Daar word aangetoon dat M.
polvmorpha subsp. ruderalis uitheems is, aangesien dit slegs in plaaslike kwekerye voorkont. M. paleacea subsp. paleacea se
teenwoordigheid hier word bevestig, maar dit is skaars. Origens kon min tot die uiters volledige studies deur Bischler-Causse
( 1 993a) bygevoeg word.
CONTENTS
Genus Marchantia L 183
Key to local subgenera, sections and species 184
Subgenus Marchantia L 185
1 . M. polymorpha L 185
2. M. berteroana Lehm. & Lindenb 189
Subgenus Chlamidium (Corda) Bischl 192
Section Paleaceae Bischl 192
3. M. paleacea Bertol 193
Section Chlamidium 195
4. M. pappeana Lehm 197
Section Papillatae Bischl 199
5. M. debilis Goebel 201
Acknowledgements 202
References 202
Specimens examined 203
* National Botanical Institute. Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001.
MS. received: 1995-03-27.
Marchantia L., Species plantarum edn 1: 1137
(1753) emend. Raddi, Opuscoli Scientifica di Bologna:
358 (1818); Sim: 27 (1926); S.W. Amell: 53 (1963);
Bischl.: 6(1984); Bischl.: 13 (1989a); Bischl.: 13 (1993a);
R.M. Schust.: 305 (1992). Type species: Marchantia po-
lymorpha L. [lecto. fide Leman: 115 (1823)].
Marchantia M. Marchant f.: 229 (1739).
Marchantiopsis Douin & R.C.V. Douin: 135 (1918).
Chlamidium Corda: 647 (1829).
Thalloid, smallish to medium-sized to large, fiat and
ungrooved, relatively delicate or firm and occasionally
rather leathery, green to dark green or greyish green, along
margins sometimes purplish, rarely all over dorsally and
occasionally also ventrally; dorsal face with distinct po-
lygonal areolae, each with a pore; in crowded mats, some-
times in partial rosettes, hygrophytes, requiring high
humidity and mostly unable to sustain life dry; growing
184
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
on damp soil of vertical stream banks, at waterfalls, dams,
weirs and canals, sometimes on wet rocks, rarely on rotting
wood.
Branches broadly band- or narrowly ribbon-shaped,
pseudodichotomously furcate, without lateral or apical inno-
vations from keel, ventrally thickened medianly and tapered
toward margins, which are lobulate, crenulate, undulate or
entire, apex notched, with median scale appendages recurved
over edge. Dorsal epidermal cells generally unistratose, often
without chloroplasts, walls thin or slightly thickened but lack-
ing trigones; air pores compound, encircled by several su-
perimposed concentric rings of cells, some above epidermis,
others projecting into air chambers below, the latter in a shal-
low, single layer, densely packed with 2^1(5 )-celled assimi-
latory filaments; storage tissue compact, sometimes with a
few sclerotic cells and/or mucilage cavities, also with scat-
tered oil cells each containing a single, large oil body, these
present as well elsewhere in thallus and scales; numerous
rhizoids ventrally, some smooth, others pegged, rarely with
inner thickenings spirally connected. Ventral scales in 4 or
more rows, covering part or all of ventral face and rarely
projecting beyond margins, median scales bluntly triangular,
constricted where joined to appendage, laminal scales
smaller, sometimes in double rows, lacking an appendage,
marginal scales rarely present. Cupules borne dorsally on
thalli, hollowed, contracted below, flaring above, margin cili-
ate, lobed-ciliate, dentate or nearly entire, containing discoid
gemmae that reproduce vegetatively.
Dioicous. Gametangiophores stalked. Stalks arising at
apex of main and/or lateral branches, basally sometimes
surrounded by large scales, generally without an append-
age, along their length bearing filiform scales, 2-4 rhizoid
furrows and 0-2 bands of air chambers with compound
air pores. Antheridiophores with receptacular discs rather
flat, lobed or divided into rays, antheridia and compound
air pores on dorsal side, several rows of scales per lobe
beneath. Arche goniophores with receptacles convex
above, lobed or divided into ± flat rays, dorsally with
compound air pores, below with scales and archegonia,
each one surrounded by calyptra and pseudoperianth, in
groups that are enclosed by bivalved involucres, occurring
alternate with the lobes or rays (in African species).
Sporophytes consisting of foot, short seta (elongating
later) and subglobose capsule, its unistratose wall with
annular thickenings, dehiscing irregularly. Spores small,
thin-walled, ± triangular-globular, ornamentation with nu-
merous thin, irregularly convoluted ridges or with few
wide ridges separated by granules, the 2 faces similar or
dissimilar. Elaters tapering at ends, bi- or trispiral. Chro-
mosome number: n = 9 (basically).
On the basis of differences in spore morphology, ger-
mination patterns and flavonoid patterns, the genus is sub-
divided into 3 subgenera: Marchantia , Chlamidium and
Protomarc hand a R.M. Schust. The latter is absent from
the region.
Key to local subgenera, sections and species
la Thalli with margins plicate-crisped, crenulate or lobulate, dorsally with or without dark median band; epidermal
pores with walls of cells bordering inner opening slightly or strongly projecting and pores then cruciate; scales
in 4-6 rows, covering % or all of ventral surface and then also extending beyond thallus margins; appendages
of median scales orbicular or reniform or ovate, marginal cells slightly or strikingly smaller than inner cells;
laminal scales much wider than long; cupules with ciliate lobes at margins, externally with papillae; male
receptacles peltate, shallowly dissected into 6-10 broad lobes; membranous margins of rays crenulate or entire
and then with very small cells; female receptacles deeply dissected into 9-11 terete rays, with or without
papillae; stalks with single broad band of air chambers; margins of involucres with ciliate lobes; spores 8-16
pm in diameter, ornamentation on 2 faces similar, with numerous narrow convoluted ridges
subgenus Marchantia (p. 185):
2a Thalli with margins entire or crenulate, crisped-plicate; dorsally often with dark median band; cells bordering
inner opening of epidermal pores with slightly convex inner walls, pores not cruciate; ventral scales in 6
rows and extending beyond thallus margins; appendage of median scales small, margins bordered with some-
what smaller cells; membranous margin of male receptacle crenulate, composed of slightly smaller cells;
rays of female receptacle with numerous papillae 1. M. polymorpha
2b Thalli with margins lobulate; dorsally without dark median band; cells bordering inner opening of epidermal
pores with strongly convex inner walls and pores cruciate; ventral scales in 4(-6) rows and not extending
beyond thallus margins, marginal scales sometimes partly or altogether absent; appendage of median scales
large, margins entire or slightly crenulate, bordered with strikingly small marginal cells; membranous margin
of male receptacle not distinctly crenulate, composed of very small cells; rays of female receptacle without
papillae 2. M. berteroana
lb Thalli with margins entire, nearly flat or sometimes slightly undulate, dorsally with or without dark median band;
cells bordering inner opening of epidermal pores with straight or convex walls, rarely with strongly projecting
processes and then pores cruciate; scales in 4 rows, covering V4 to almost 2/3 of ventral surface; appendage
of median scales orbicular, ovate or ± triangular, apically acuminate, acute or apiculate, marginal cells smaller
than inner ones; laminal scales as long as or longer than wide; cupules with margins ciliate, almost entire or
rarely with ciliate lobes, externally rarely with papillae; male receptacles palmate or rarely peltate, shallowly
or deeply dissected into rays; membranous margin of lobes entire or slightly crenulate; female receptacles
dissected into 5-9 apically ± flat lobes; margins of involucres ciliate or entire, rarely with ciliate lobes; stalks
with air chambers in 1 or 2 bands; spores 20-35 pm in diameter, ornamentation on 2 faces dissimilar, distally
mostly with wide ridges subgenus Chlamidium (p. 1 92):
3a Thalli medium-sized to large, 6-8(11) mm wide; epidermal pores with inner walls of cells bordering inner
opening strongly projecting and pores cruciate; appendages of median scales with margins entire or slightly
denticulate; cupules with triangular, ciliate lobes and externally with numerous papillae; female receptacle
deeply dissected into lobes, apically truncate or emarginate; margins of involucres with ciliate lobes ....
section Paleaceae (p. 192), 3. M. paleacea
3b Thalli smallish to large, 3.5-10.0 mm wide; epidermal pores with inner walls of cells bordering inner opening
straight or convex; appendages of median scales with margins often distinctly toothed; cupules bearing
long or short cilia or almost entire at margins and externally without or with few papillae; female receptacle
shallowly or deeply dissected into lobes; margins of involucres ciliate or ± entire:
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
185
4a Thalli 6.0-8.5 (—10.0) mm wide; dorsally without dark median band; appendages of median scales large,
520-550 x 375-530 pm, inner cells also comparatively large, 75.0-87.5 x 32.5-42.5 pm, i.e. cell structure
loose; margins of cupules with cilia up to 6 cells long; female receptacle large, shallowly dissected into
broad lobes, sometimes bearing a male ray; margins of involucres ciliate
section Chlamidium (p. 195), 4. M. pappeana
4b Thalli 3.0-7. 5 mm wide; mostly with distinct dark median band dorsally; appendages of median scales small,
350—375 x 275—340 pm, inner cells not markedly ‘loose’, cells 67.5—75.0 x 30.0—37.5 pm; margins of
cupules crenulate or with short cilia, up to 3 cells long; female receptacle rather small, deeply dissected
into narrow lobes; margins of involucres entire or crenulate section Papillatae (p. 199),. 5. M. debilis
Subgenus Marchantia
Marchantia F. sect. Astromarchantia Nees: 60, 61 (1838)
(nom. illegit.)
Marchantia L. (without rank) Stellatae Gottsche, Fin-
denb. & Nees; 522 (1844—1847; published 1846)
Marchantia L. (without rank) Marchantiotypus Dumort.:
150(1874).
Thallus branches wide, from nearly 7 mm to almost
twice as wide; margins crenulate, lobulate or plicate-
crisped. Dorsal epidermis with or without papillae; air
pores surrounded by 4-5(6) concentric rings of cells, at
inner openings sometimes with rounded walls, otherwise
with pronounced processes and pores then cruciate; stor-
age tissue lacking sclerotic cells. Scales in 4-8 rows, cov-
ering 3A to all of ventral face, containing scattered oil cells;
median scales with appendages, ovate, orbicular or reni-
form, not acuminate at apex; margins crenulate, toothed
or entire, sometimes with a row of cells very much smaller
than those in interior; laminal scales wider than long, on
either side of median scales, apically rounded, lacking pa-
pillae, upper cell walls with trigones. Cupules with acutely
triangular, toothed lobes, externally papillate.
Dioicous. Antheridiophores with receptacles ± symmet-
rical. peltate, rays very short and broad; stalks with 2 rhi-
zoid furrows, but lacking air chambers. Archegonio-
phores with receptacle deeply dissected into terete lobes;
stalks with 2 rhizoid furrows and a single band of air
chambers; involucres with toothed or ciliate margins.
Spores small, 8-16 pm in diameter; 2 faces similarly or-
namented, with numerous thin, highly convoluted ridges,
triradiate mark distinct to absent and wing absent.
Marchantia polymorpha , M. berteroanci and M. plicata
(from central and South America) are classified in subge-
nus Marchantia.
1 . Marchantia polymorpha L. in Species plan-
tarum edn 1: 1137 (1753); Bischl.: 34 (1993a). Type:
Europe, Dillenius in Historia Muscorum. t. 76, fig. 6E, F
(1742) [OXF, lecto., typo., fide Bischl. & Boisselier-
Dubayle: 363 (1991) (photo, of typo, in PRE!)].
Synonymy after Bischler-Causse (1993a).
Thallus large, mostly prostrate, sometimes growing
somewhat erect, apical segments broadly obovate, bright
or dark or yellowish green, medianly with or without dark,
continuous or interrupted band dorsally (Figure 1A), mar-
gins reddish brown, crisped, entire, sometimes crenulate;
pores quite small to large, subdorsal air chamber walls
visible from above; margins not raised and incurved when
dry; in crowded, overlying patches, repeatedly pseudodi-
chotomously furcate. Branches with total length up to 35
mm, terminally 2-15 mm long and successive branches
5— 1 0(— 14) mm apart, narrowly divergent to overlapping,
7-10 mm wide, 325-375 pm thick over midrib, laterally
thinning out into wings, apex notched, with appendages
of several purple-red median scales recurved over edge;
margins acute, thin, becoming recurved, flanks sloping
obliquely, ventral face medianly keeled (Figure 1C),
densely covered with rhizoids and on either side with 3
rows of purple or brownish scales, the outermost extend-
ing beyond thallus margins (Figure IB).
Dorsal epidermal cells unistratose, mostly hyaline,
4-6-sided, 35-74 x 18-30 pm, thin-walled, lacking
trigones, in transverse section 18-20 pm thick, marginal
cells in 3(4) rows (Figure 1G), those in outer 1 or 2 rows
smaller, generally rectangular, 15.0-27.5 x 17.5-20.0 pm,
inner cells larger, 27.5-37.5 x 22.5-27.5 pm; air pores
quite numerous, 175-350 pm distant from each other,
raised, compound, round or oval, 30.0-62.5 x 40.0-60.0
pm, suiTounded by 4 or 5 concentric rings of cells, 2 or
3 above epidermis and 2 or 3 projecting into air chambers
(Figure IF), innermost ring of upper cells collapsed, ± 5
pm wide, next ring of cells ± 40 x 10 pm, outer ring of
cells ± 50 x 12 pm, partly overlying epidermal cells (Fig-
ure ID), inner opening mostly surrounded by 4 cells (Fig-
ure IE), ± 27.5 pm long, and ± 12.5 pm wide across
widest parts which protrude into cavity and are covered
with black granular deposit. Assimilation tissue 50-100
pm thick, Vg— V3 as thick as thallus, air chambers in a
single layer, 150-250 pm wide, height of bounding walls
2 or 3(4) cells, round or oval, 17.5-27.5 x 15.0-17.5 pm,
chambers internally crowded with densely chlorophyllose,
mostly 2- or 3-celled filaments (Figure IF), cells round,
oval, elongated or irregular, 20.0-32.5 x 15.0 pm; storage
tissue occupying ± 1 1 rows of cells in ventral 2/3— 5/g of
thickness of thallus medianly, decreasing laterally, cells
angular, 45.0-75.0 x 60.0-65.0 pm. smaller just below
air cavities and where adjoining ventral epidermis; scle-
rotic cells and mucilage cavities absent; rhizoids some
smooth. 1 5-50 pm wide, faintly brown, others tuberculate,
7.5-12.5 pm wide, and still others with internal ‘spirals',
± 12.5 pm wide.
Median scales (Figure IK) pale mauve, in one row
on either side of midrib, ± obliquely triangular, body up
to 750 pm long, width 1575-2250 pm across nearly
straight base, continuing into narrow ‘tail', cells in body
of scale elongated, 4-6-sided, 85-160 x (25-)40-62 pm,
rhizoids arising from a few smaller rhizoid initial cells
and with 5 or 6 scattered oil cells present, ± 25.0 x 22.5
pm, toward margins cells changing orientation and some
in semiradial groups, from centre of which 1 or 2 papillae
project. 35-50 x 10 pm; scale narrowing upwards, deeply
constricted where joined with appendage, which is broadly
186
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
FIGURE I . — Marchantia polymorpha L. subsp. ruderalis. A-G, thallus: A, dorsal lace of apical branch of <? with disc and cupule; B, ventral face of apical
branch; C, t.s. of branch; D, air pore and surrounding cells from above; E, air pore from below; F, t.s. of air pore, dorsal epidermal cells and air
chamber; G, margin, H, cupule margin; I, marginal scale; J, laminal scale; K, median scale; L, appendage of median scale; M, a" receptacle; N, ¥
receptacle from side; O, t.s. of cf stalk; P, t.s. of ¥ stalk; Q, median scale of o' receptacle. R-V, scale: R, along o" stalk; S, ¥ receptacle; T, along ¥
stalk; Ui, U2, loot of d" stalk; Vi, V2, fool of ¥ stalk. W, t.s. of ¥ ray; X, detail of part of section of ¥ ray, showing papillae on epidermal cells and
air chambers; Y, margin of 0" ray; Z, margin of involucre. A, M, O, Q, R, Ui, U2, Y, Perold & Koekemoer 3248\ B-L, N, P, S, T, Vi, V2, Wi, X,
Z, Glen 3728. Scale bars: A, B, M, N, 2 mm; C, 1 mm; D-F, 50 pm; G, X, Y, 100 pm; H-L, O-W, 250 pm.
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
187
rounded, brown or tinged with purple, (350-) 400-640 x
500-700 pm, central cells 4-6-sided, 42.5-62.5 x
32.5- 50.0 pm, with 1-3 oil cells, up to 30.0 x 22.5 pm,
margin sharply toothed, crenulate or almost entire, cells
small, some conical, ± 22.5 x 15.0 pm, projecting slightly,
others rectangular, with long axis parallel to margins, ±
35.0 x 7.5 pm, or perpendicular, with 10 pm high protu-
berance, sometimes separated as distinct cell, submarginal
cells larger, 25.0-27.5 x 20.0-37.5 pm. Laminal scales
hyaline or pale mauve, in one row on either side of and
lateral to median scales, almost wedge-shaped, but with apex
rounded, base flatly arched (Figure 1 J), 600-825 x
1450-1750 pm, upper cells rather irregularly arranged, some
with slightly thickened walls, 4—6-sided, 37.5-42.5 x
17.5- 27.5 pm, larger lower down, 70-90 x 30-35 pm, oil
cells rare, 5 or 6 rhizoids originating from smaller internal
initial cells, at upper margin, several papillae, ± 47.5 x 12.5
pm. Marginal scales (Figure II) usually projecting beyond
thallus margins, hyaline or brownish, oblong or ovate, apex
rounded, 700-750 x 550-650 pm, upper cells with walls
thickened and brown, ± 47.5 x 32.5 pm, lower down walls
not thickened, cells 70.0-120.0 x 25.0-37.5 pm, up to 5 or
6 scattered oil cells and some rhizoid initials present. Cupules
with ciliate, ± triangular lobes (Figure 1H), ± 240 pm long
and 250-275 pm wide at base, apically with 5 or 6 cells in
a uniseriate, vertical row, top cell conical, ± 20 x 10 pm,
lower cells gradually enlarging, bottom cell trapezoid, ± 27.5
x 32.5 pm, at base of lobes on either side 3 or 4 trans-
versely projecting cellular filaments or cilia, 1-6 cells long,
cells ± 35 x 10 pm, lower down cupule wall several cell
layers thick, exteriorly with numerous 1-3-celled papillae
and internally with many oil cells.
Dioicous. Antheiidiophore arising from apex of termi-
nal segment (Figure 1A) of main or short lateral branch,
raised on stalk, ± 4.5-15.0 mm long, in transverse section
rounded, at widest part along its length, ± 975 x 1000 pm
(Figure 10), cortical cells small, 10.0-17.5 x 7.5-20.0
pm, outer wall slightly thickened and bulging, medullary
cells larger, angular, 22.545.0 x 22.5-35.0 pm, air cham-
bers absent, but with 2 rhizoid furrows, 237.5-250.0 x
87.5- 137.5 pm, lined with purple pigmented cells; scales
at base of stalk (Figure 1 U i , U2), large, with purple bases,
round or oblong, lacking an appendage, 1 250-2000 x 800
pm, cells in body of scale, 50.0-57.5 x 20.0-30.0 pm,
smaller at apex and margin, 22.5-37.5 x 12.5 pm, some-
times with protruding papillae, up to 8 scattered oil cells
present; scales along length of stalk, hyaline, filiform (Fig-
ure 1R) (1)2-3 cells wide; receptacle ± 8 mm in diameter,
shallowly dissected into 8(— 1 0) lobes, ± 375 pm long,
symmetric (Figure 1M), basal sinus up to 30° wide; mar-
gins of lobes (Figure 1Y) membranous, hyaline, crenulate,
cells in outer 1 or 2 rows small, 10.0-17.5 x 15.0-22.5
pm, some with a bulging protrusion, inner cells larger,
30.0-72.5 x 32.5-37.5 pm; median scales on ventral side
of lobes (Figure IQ) hyaline, oblong with rounded apex
and lacking appendage, 1375-1575 x 600-850 pm, cells
in body of scale 4-6-sided, 50.0-75.0 x 27.5-30.0 pm,
4—10 oil cells present, ± 25 x 25 pm, upper marginal cells
thin-walled, small, 7.5-15.0 x 12.5-15.0 pm, sometimes
toward base of lateral margins, with small papillae.
Arche goniophore arising from apex of terminal segment
of main or short lateral branch, raised on stalk, 17-40 mm
long, in transverse section 1000 x 1250 pm, narrower across
single band of air chambers, ± 625 pm (Figure IP), cor-
tical cells small, 10.0-20.0 x 7.5-17.5 pm, outer wall
slightly thickened, medullary cells angular, 37.5—42.5 x
25.0-32.5 pm, with 2 rhizoid furrows, ± 350 x 250 pm;
scales at base of stalk, (Figure IV], V2), large, puiple or
brown or hyaline, rarely with slightly constricted appendage,
mostly without, but some appear to be composite scales,
shape irregular, up to 750 x 1000(4 750) pm, inner cells ±
50 x 45 pm, small at crenulate upper margin, 17.5-25.0 x
12.5-27.5 pm, at lateral margins toward base, sometimes
with papillae, ± 35 x 15 pm; scales along length of stalk
(Figure IT), hyaline or brown, filiform, up to 600 pm long,
apical cell conical, ± 55.0 x 12.5 pm, lower 2(3) cells ±
62.5 x 20.0 pm, serially arranged and then 2 adjacent, some-
times with base of upper cell wedged between them, and
sometimes with a short lateral branch; receptacle 9.5-10.0
mm in diameter, nearly symmetric, with small round projec-
tion dorsally, deeply divided into 9-1 1 rays of slightly un-
equal length (Figure IN), 2500-3200 pm, basal sinus ± 40°,
margins distally decurved and terete in transverse section
(Figure 1W), toward apices with numerous conical papillae
(Figure IX), ± 12.5 x 17.5 pm; involucres with margins
hyaline or occasionally purple-tinged, with tapering ciliate
lobes (Figure 1Z), 300-350 pm long, 90-150 pm wide at
base, inner cells 5- or 6-sided, 52.5-75.0 x 22.5-32.5 pm,
with scattered, smaller oil cells in between, cilia ( 1— )2— 5
cells or up to 230 pm long, top cell conical, 37.547.5 x
10.0 pm, basally with single cell, 72.5 x 25.0 pm, but some-
times with 2; scales of receptacle (Figure IS) hyaline, up to
2000 pm long and 80 pm or 6 cells wide at base, apical
cell conical, ± 62.5 x 12.5 pm, following 3 cells in a vertical
row, ± 57.5 x 15 pm, basal cells 62.5-87.5 x 12.5-20.0 pm,
sometimes branched along the length. Spores 10.0-12.5 pm
in diameter, triangular-globular, yellow; distal face (Figure
2 A, B) with numerous highly convoluted and branched,
smooth ridges; proximal face (Figure 2C, D ) with faint, col-
lapsed triradiate mark, facets finely and densely granular,
narrowly winged. Elaters yellow-brown, 350435 x 5 pm,
gradually tapering to narrow tips, bispiral. Chromosome
number, n = 9 (Bischler-Causse 1993a).
Marchantia polymorpha, which has been known since
classical times, is widespread. It has frequently been de-
scribed but until recently its taxonomy has been unre-
solved because proper lectotypification had not been done.
Amell (1963) reported it in southern Africa from Golden
Gate, near Clarens in the eastern [Orange | Free State and
from Zimbabwe [Southern Rhodesia], near Odnazi River
Bridge, Umtali. These specimens are not held at PRE or
at BOL and up to now, the presence here of M. polymor-
pha under natural conditions has not been confirmed.
Bischler-Causse (1993a) stressed the need for such con-
firmation. It is therefore considered worthy of note that
female specimens of M. polymorpha with cupules have
recently been collected at Johannesburg Botanical Garden,
Glen 3468 & 3728, in a shade house and also at Sterlig
Nursery, Krugersdorp, Perold & Koekemoer CH 13640
(Figure 3). The plants are clearly introduced, but a de-
scription is nevertheless given. To complete the descrip-
tion and illustrations fresh male plants collected on a
pavement in Ledbury, England, Perold & Koekemoer
3248, had to be used.
The specimens above have been referred to M. poly-
morpha subsp. ruderalis Bischl. & Boisselier-Dubayle,
188
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
FIGURE 2. — SEM micrographs of spores. A-D, Marchantia polymorpha , S.M. Perold <£ M. Koekemoer 3248: A, distal face; B, part of distal face
much enlarged; C, proximal face; D, part of proximal face much enlarged. E-I, M. berteroana , Geldenhuys 1332: E, distal face; F, part of
distal face much enlarged; G, proximal face; H, part of proximal face much enlarged; I, side view. A, C, x 3006; B, D, x 5780; E, x 3044; F,
H, x 5596; G, x 2875; I, x 3006.
since they grow as weeds in man-made habitats and agree
in other respects with this subspecies, as distinguished by
Bischler-Causse & Boisselier-Dubayle (1991). They are
characterized by the fresh thalli being prostrate and bright
green, with a dark, rather indistinct and discontinuous me-
dian band with elongated air chambers, by the dorsal air
pores being 50.0-62.5 pm wide, the dorsal epidermal cells
35-55 pm long and the median scale appendages having
toothed margins and being 350-500 x 510-760 pm in size.
The other 2 subspecies of M. polymorpha, polymorpha and
montivagans, have so far not been found in southern Af-
rica. They are distinguished by occurring in natural habi-
tats, with the former growing more or less erect, being dark
green, with a conspicuous median dark band lacking air
chambers, having small air pores, short dorsal epidermal
cells and the median scale appendages having entire mar-
gins; the latter subspecies is prostrate, yellow-green, lacks
a median band, the air pores are larger, the dorsal cells are
of intermediate length and the median scale appendages
are of average size and the margins toothed. The distin-
guishing characters of the subspecies are given, in case M.
polymorpha subsp. polymorpha and M. polymorpha subsp.
montivagans are found in southern Africa in the future.
Lectotypification of M. polymorpha was recently done
by Bischler-Causse & Boisselier-Dubayle (1991) by
means of a Dillenian illustration and by a specimen held
in OXF (i.e. a typotype). This corresponds to the first of
three Linnean varieties (Linnaeus 1753), namely var. [°c],
which was later called 'aquatica' . This first variety [®=]
forms the basis for the application of the specific name
(Isoviita 1970). However, since the lectotype of M. poly-
morpha var. polymorpha of Linnaeus corresponds to the
taxon ‘ aquatica ’ (at any rank), it renders that name ille-
gitimate, because the epithet ‘ polymorpha ’ would be used
for a taxon not including its type. The best procedure
seemed, therefore, for Bischler-Causse & Boisselier-
Dubayle to describe their three newly separated electro-
phoretic groups (in three enzyme systems: esterases,
peroxidases and acid phosphatases) as subspecies, give
two of them new names and select good, recent type
specimens. M. polymorpha L. subsp. polymorpha thus cor-
responds to the taxon formerly called ‘ aquatica M. po\y-
morpha L. subsp. ruderalis Bischl. & Boisselier-Dubayle
corresponds roughly to the former polymorpha ‘ sensu
stricto' and M. polymorpha L. subsp. montivagans Bischl.
& Boisselier-Dubayle roughly to the former ‘ alpestris ' .
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
189
On chemical evidence Markham et al. (1977) had pre-
viously concluded that the three taxa of M. polymorpha
should be treated as varieties rather than as separate spe-
cies, since they all possess identical flavone glucuronides.
The time of going to press of Schuster’s (1992) monu-
mental work pre-dated the publication by Bischler-Causse
& Boisselier-Dubayle (1991) on the lectotypification of
M. polymorpha , but judging by some of the remarks con-
tained in it, it is by no means certain that he would have
accepted it. He still subscribes to the genetic analyses of
Burgeff (1943), although they have been shown to be out
of date, and he therefore treats the segregates of M. po-
lymorpha as distinct species.
As mentioned above, in southern Africa M. polymor-
pha subsp. ruderalis is only known from man-made sites,
i.e. in nurseries. Its presence in natural habitats has not
been confirmed. Asakawa et al. (1988) refer to the distri-
bution of sesquiterpenoids and cyclic bis-bibenzyls in
southern African collections of M. polymorpha. but it is
not known where the material was obtained from or who
identified it. Magill & Schelpe (1979) and Arnold & De
Wet (1993) list M. polymorpha as occurring in southern
Africa, but these lists are based on erroneous information
in the literature.
Marchantia polymorpha is very similar to M. ber-
teroana. but can be distinguished from it by the marginal
scales which are always present and which mostly extend
beyond the crisped, sometimes crenulate thallus margins;
by the air pores not being cruciate; by the presence of
numerous papillae on the rays of the female receptacle
and by the appendages of the median scales bordered by
larger cells.
2 . Marchantia berteroana Lehm. & Lindenb. i n
Lehm., Novarum et minus cognitarum stirpium, pugillus 6: 2 1
(1834); Gottsche et al.: 481 (1846); Steph.: 393 (1898-1900);
Schift'n.: 41—44 (1896); A. Evans: 246 (1917); Hassel de
Menendez: 160 (1963); S.W. Amell: 55 (1963); E.O. Campb.:
122 (1965); Bischl.: 44 (1984); Bischl.: 81 (1989a); Bischl.:
56 (1993a). Type: ‘In insula Juan Fernandez, legit cl. Bertero
(Herb. Hooked), ( W8294 , holo.; FH, G, NY, PC, STR, W, iso.).
FIGURE 3. — Distribution of M. polymorpha var. ruderalis , •; M.
berteroana. ▲; and M. paleacea, ■ in southern Africa.
M. tabularis Nees: 71 (1838); Sim: 28 (1926). Type: South Africa,
Tafelberg, leg. Ecklon (W8289) (female) W!, syn.; leg. Bergius (male)
STR, syn.
M. contractu Bisch.: 135 (1846) (fide Bischler-Causse (1993a)). Type:
South Africa, Cap, Duyvelsberg, Krauss s.n. (BM. FH, G!, PC. W).
For the rest of the synonymy consult Bischler-Causse (1993a).
Thallus robust, rather flat, almost leathery, apical seg-
ments broadly oblong (Figure 4A), green, yellowish green
or bluish green and occasionally with some purple pig-
mentation, without distinct median band dorsally, margins
hyaline, puiplish or brownish, irregularly lobulate, more
or less plicate but not crisped, entire or minutely crenulate,
pores numerous, small, almost closed, subdorsal air cham-
ber walls indistinct from above, when wet; thallus margins
not raised or incurved, when dry; in crowded, overlying
mats, repeatedly furcate but rather irregularly so. Branches
with total length up to 80 mm, terminally up to 20 mm
long and successive branches 6-10 mm apart, narrowly
to moderately divergent, 9.5— 12.0(— 15.0) mm wide,
600-900 pm thick over midrib, laterally thinning out into
wings (Figure 4C); apex notched with brownish, hyaline
or partly puiplish red appendages of median scales recur-
ved over edge; margins acute, thin, slightly recurved,
flanks sloping obliquely; ventral face (Figure 4B) brownish
or purplish, medianly keeled, covered with rhizoids, and with
2 rows of scales on either side (sometimes with 3), extending
over 2 3 * * * * */4-9/io of thallus width, but never right to the edge.
Dorsal epidermal cells unistratose, seldom bistratose
in patches, hyaline, polygonal, 4-7-sided, (50-)57. 5-77.5
x 20.0-30.0 pm, walls slightly thickened, in transverse
section 15-20 pm thick, occasionally containing an oil
body; along margins (Figure 4G) 3 or 4 rows of cells,
smallest in the outermost row, rectangular or polygonal,
17.5-22.5 x 10.0-15.0 pm, enlarging inwardly, 27.5-37.5 x
25.0- 37.5 pm, air pores numerous, ( 1 07.5—) 1 37.5— 1 85.0
(-225.0) pm distant fom each other, raised, compound, oval
(37. 5-)57. 5-75.0 x 27.5-47.5(-55.0) pm, encircled by
(4)5-7 concentric rings of cells, 3(4) above epidermis and 3
or 4 projecting into air chambers (Figure 4F), innermost ring
with collapsed cells ± 5 pm wide, uppermost ring with 4 or
5 sausage-shaped cells, 50-55 x 10 pm, also 4 or 5 cells in
next ring, 45.0-47.5 x 27.5-32.5 pm, those in outermost
ring irregular in shape as they adjoin or partly overlie dorsal
epidermal cells (Figure 4D), 55.0-62.5 x 12.5-20.0 pm. in-
ner opening with 4 or 5 cells, their inside walls covered with
a granular deposit and strongly protuberant, leaving only a
small, usually cruciate opening (Figure 4Ej, E?). Assimilation
tissue 45— 50(— 60) pm thick. ’/jO-'Ao as thick as thallus, air
chambers in a single layer, 77.5-120.0 pm wide, bounding
walls 3 or 4 cells high, rounded or angular, 7.5-20.0 x
10.0- 12.5 pm, chambers crowded with densely chlorophyl-
lose filaments, cells oval, round or irregularly shaped.
15.0- 20.0 x 12.5-15.0 pm; storage tissue occupying ventral
9/jq— 19A>o of thickness of thallus medianly, decreasing lat-
erally, cells angular, up to 75 pm wide, becoming smaller
lower down, containing scattered starch grains and some
with an oil body, sclerotic cells and mucilage cavities ab-
sent; rhizoids some smooth, ± 27.5 pm wide, others
pegged, 27.5^15.0 pm wide.
Median scales (Figure 41) hyaline or puiplish. in one
row on either side of midrib, body ± obliquely triangular,
up to 1450 pm long, across base 2875-3500 pm, hardly
190
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
FIGURE 4. — Marchanlia berteroana Lehm. & Lindenb, A-G, lhallus: A, dorsal face of apical branch with cupule; B, ventral face of apical branch;
C, t.s. of branch; D, air pore and surrounding cells from above; Ei, E2, air pores from below; F, t.s. of air pore, dorsal epidermal cells and air
chamber; G, margin. H, laminal scale; I, median scale; J 1 , J2, appendages of median scales; K, cupule margin; L, ¥ receptacle; M, o" receptacle;
N, t.s. of <f stalk; O, t.s. of ¥ stalk. P-R. scale: P, from foot of a" stalk; Q, from along <? stalk; R, median scale of ef receptacle. S, margin of
<f ray; T, scale from foot of ¥ stalk; U. scale from ¥ receptacle; V, margin of involucre. A, F, G, L, N, P, R, S, A.E. van Wyk 2066: B-Et,
E2, H— J 1 , h, M, O, T-V, Geldenhuys 1332: K, Q, Pillans 4048. Scale bars: A, B, L, M, 2 mm; C, 1 mm; D-G, 50 pm; H-K, N-R, T, 250
pm; S, U, 100 pm.
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
191
arched, central cells elongated and narrow, 4 or 5— (6)-
sided, 125.0-212.5 x 17.5-30.0 pm, toward margins outer
7 or 8 rows of cells thinner-walled, orientation irregular
and much smaller in size, 27.5-50.0 x 20.0-22.5 |am, with
as many as 30 scattered oil cells, ± 87.5 x 37.5 pm, dark
brown, scale gradually narrowing upwards and then ±
1875 pm wide, abruptly and deeply constricted at join
with appendage, hyaline or purplish or both, orbicular to
broadly ovate (Figure 4J j, J2), apex rounded to somewhat
obtusely narrowed, basally cordate, 675-950 x 650-800
pm, median cells 4-6-sided, 80.0-95.0 x 45.0-52.5 pm,
with 4 or 5 oil cells, margins entire or minutely crenulate,
bordered by 1 or 2(3) rows of very small cells, 30.0^10.0
x 10.0-20.0 pm, mostly narrowly rectangular to subquad-
rate and orientated with long axis perpendicular to margin,
sometimes alternating with 2 stacked cells parallel to mar-
gin, and even smaller, 12.5 x 12.5-17.5 pm. Lamina!
scales mostly hyaline, yellowish brown or reddish, lateral
to, but also alternating irregularly with median scales,
broadly rounded, lacking apical appendage, base flatly
arched (Figure 4H), 850-1125 x 1875-3375 pm, cells in
body of scale 4-6-sided, walls straight or sinuous,
92.5-125.0 x 22.5-32.5 pm, sometimes in upper part with
thickened walls, but in 6 or 7 rows toward inner margins
thinner-walled, smaller, 32.5-50.0 x 12.5-25.0 pm, and
very variable in orientation, with ± 12 oil cells, margins
entire or slightly crenulate. Marginal scales rarely to
sometimes present, when more or less scattered and never
extending beyond thallus margins, hyaline, crescent-
shaped with rounded apex, 675-1250 x 775 pm, upper
cells small, with thickened comers, 15.0-25.0 x 12.5 pm,
inner cells with slightly sinuous walls, 35.0-58.5 x
15.0- 25.0 pm. toward base cells 5- or 6-sided, up to 112.5
x 22.5 pm. Cupule margins with ciliate, ± triangular lobes
(Figure 4K), up to 675 pm long and 250 pm wide at base,
at apex with 10 or 11 cells in a tapering, uniseriate, vertical
row, top cell conical, ± 32.5 x 7.5 pm, lower cells larger,
up to 37.5 x 30.0 pm, at base of lobes on either side a
few transversely projecting (2— )3 or 4-(-6)-celled cilia,
lower down cupule wall several cell layers thick, exteri-
orly with numerous 1- or 2(-3)-celled papillae, 32.5-50.0
x 20.0 pm and internally with many oil cells.
Dioicous. Antheridiophore arising from apex of termi-
nal segment of main or short lateral branch, raised on stalk
(Figure 4N), 23-30 mm long, in transverse section
rounded, diameter ± 1000 pm, cortical cells small,
10.0- 15.0 x 12.5-17.5 pm, with thickened outer wall,
medullary cells larger, mostly angular, 22.5-45.0 x
15.0- 45.0 pm, band of air chambers absent but with 2
rhizoid furrows, ± 162.5 x 100.0-125.0 um; scales at base
of stalk large (Figure 4P), hyaline or purplish, roughly
triangular or oblong, sometimes slightly bulging, lacking
an appendage, up to 1200 x 1400 pm, cells in body of
scale 4—6-sided, often with sinuous walls, 47.5-87.5 x
22.4-25.0 pm, along upper margins 1 or 2 rows of much
smaller cells, 12.5-25.0 x 12.5-30.0 pm, with up to 10
scattered oil cells throughout; scales along length of stalk
(Figure 4Q) hyaline, filiform, sometimes only 3 cells wide
but sometimes wider and up to 9 cells wide; receptacle
(Figure 4M) up to 10 mm in diameter, shallowly dissected
into 8(9) ± symmetric lobes, basal sinus ± 80° wide; mar-
gins of lobes membranous, brownish or hyaline, minutely
crenulate, with 1 or 2 rows of small cells (Figure 4S),
mostly rectangular across, 15.0-20.0 x 10.0-22.5 pm. in-
ner cells larger, 52.5-87.5 x 37.5-40.0 pm; median scales
on ventral side of lobes (Figure 4R) hyaline, 750-1375 x
1000-1875 pm, cells in body of scale 4-6-sided, up to
125 x 50 pm, thin-walled, at margins smaller, ± 30.0 x
17.5 pm, appendage absent or present, ± 267.5 x 200,0
pm, oblong, rounded apically, not or hardly constricted at
join with scale, inner cells 40.0-42.5 x 15.0-22.5 pm,
smaller at margins.
Arche goniophore arising from apex of terminal seg-
ment of main or short lateral branch; raised on stalk 48-65
mm long, in transverse section (Figure 40) 1000 x 925
pm, constricted on inner side of single band of air cham-
bers, cortical cells small, 12.5-20.0 x 12.5-25.0 pm, outer
wall thicker, medullary cells angular, up to 60 x 45 pm,
in between and at centre of stalk with smaller cells ± 25
x 20 pm, containing 2 rhizoid furrows, ± 240 x 105 pm;
scales at base of stalk (Figure 4T), brownish or hyaline,
without appendage, oblong or ovate, with apex rounded,
large, 1575-2000 x 800-1250 pm, inner cells 4—6-sided,
walls mostly straight, sometimes sinuous, 75.0-125.0 x
27.5—42.5 pm. margins apically occasionally slightly cre-
nulate, with rectangular cells arranged at right angles to
margin, small, 10.0-25.0 x 12.5-25.0 pm; scales along
length of stalk (Figure 4U) hyaline, filiform, up to 6500
pm long, 2 or 3(4) cells wide, their average size ± 1 12.5
x 25.0 pm; receptacle (Figure 4L) up to 10 mm in di-
ameter, nearly symmetric, dorsally with small round me-
dian projection, deeply divided into 9 linear rays, up to
2625 x 550 pm, basal sinus ± 45° wide, margins distally
slightly decurved and terete in transverse section, lacking
papillae toward apex; involucres with margins hyaline or
purplish, with tapering ciliate lobes (Figure 4V). base
100.0- 175.0 x 125.0-182.5 pm, inner cells 5- or 6-sided.
35.0- 37.5 x 22.5-25.0 pm. lower down with numerous
oil bodies, up to 60.0 x 37.5 pm, each one almost filling
a cell, lobes apically and at sides with numerous, tapering,
branched and intertwined cilia, length up to 220 pm or 7
cells in series, 22.5-50.0 x 20.0 pm, with granules on
walls of apical cells; scales of receptacle (Figure 4U) hya-
line, filiform, up to 2150 pm long and 35.0-87.5 pm or
2-5 cells wide at base, often splitting further along and
strands mostly only 2 cells wide, 80.0-87.5 x 20.0-22.5
pm, apical cell ± 75.0 x 17.5 pm. Spores 7.5-12.5 pm in
diameter, ± globular, brownish, distal face (Figure 2E, F,
I) with numerous, much convoluted and branched ridges;
proximal face (Figure 2G, H, I) with faint triradiate mark
and winged, densely covered with numerous fine granules
and tiny irregular ridges. Elaters yellow-brown. (550-)
600-640(-770) x 5 pm, gradually tapering at both ends
for 150-200 pm, bispiral. Chromosome number : n = 9
(Bischler-Causse 1993a).
Marchantia tabularis was described from specimens
collected on Table Mountain and was placed in synonymy
under M. berteroana by Schiffner (1896). Although
Stephani (1898-1900) accepted Schiffner’s decision, he
still applied the epithet ‘ tabularis ' and was followed in
this by Sim (1926). Amell (1963) gives only brief notes
on M. berteroana. Bischler-Causse (1993a) recognized
that M. contracta, collected by Krauss at Devil's Peak,
also belongs here. M. berteroana is quite variable in size,
but generally the plants are large. Sometimes six rows of
ventral scales are present and some authors, e.g. Hassel
de Menendez (1963) and Engel ( 1990) recognize these as
192
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
belonging to a separate variety, namely var. polylepida.
However, several authors (Campbell 1965; Bischler 1984)
have pointed out that the number of rows of scales is too
unstable to warrant the designation of a variety. Schuster
( 1992) has assigned M. berteroana to his new monotypic
section, Berteroanae, on the absence of marginal scales,
on the cruciate inner openings of the epidermal pores with
six rings of cells and on the tiny marginal cells of the
median scale appendages. Bischler-Causse (1993c) is,
however, not convinced that this splitting is necessary,
since marginal scales are fairly frequently present and the
pores are often similar to those in other species of subge-
nus Marchantia.
Marchantia berteroana generally grows on damp soil,
and sometimes on wet rocks, at stream banks, near wa-
terfalls, along paths, in kloofs, passes, ravines, gorges, in
forests under trees or in burnt-over areas.
It is widely distributed in the southern hemisphere,
from South America, south to the Antarctic Peninsula and
north to Costa Rica, islands of the Atlantic and south In-
dian Ocean, southern Africa, Australia, Tasmania, New
Zealand, New Guinea, New Caledonia, Java and Sulawesi
(Bischler-Causse 1993a). In southern Africa (Figure 3) it
is known from the Western Cape, which has winter rain,
and from Kwazulu-Natal as well as the Northern Province
(Northern Transvaal | which have summer rain. Exact lo-
calities of two of these collections by Wilms and by
MacLea are not known. This distribution indicates that
the species seems to be indifferent to the seasonality of
the rainfall, in contrast to several other members of the
Marchantiales which are ± restricted to either winter or
summer rainfall areas.
Of the 50 specimens examined 36% had cupules, 34%
had antheridiophores and 46% archegoniophores; only 6%
had both.
Specimens of M. berteroana are easily distinguished
by the tiny marginal cells of the median scale appendages,
by the cruciate dorsal pores and by the lobulate thallus
margins. The membranous margins of the rays of the male
receptacle also have very small cells. Otherwise it is quite
similar to M. polymorpha, except for the latter having pa-
pillae on the rays of the carpocephalum. The ornamenta-
tion of their spores is also quite similar.
Subgenus Chlamidium (Corda) Bischl., Cryp-
togamie, Bryologie et Lichenologie 3: 362 (1982); Bischl.:
89 (1989a); Bischl.: 65 (1993a).
Marchantia L. sect. Chlamidium (Corda) Nees: 60, 101
(1838). Type: Chlamidium indicum Corda (Sieber flora
mart, exsicc. No. 375) = Marchantia chenopoda L. Type:
Sieber 378 p.p. (W, neo.; STR, iso., fide Bischl. 1984).
Thallus branches rather narrow, from 2.4 to ± 10.0 mm
wide, rarely more, margins nearly Oat, entire, sometimes
slightly undulate, rarely crisped. Dorsal epidermis with-
out papillae; air pores surrounded by (4— )5— 7 concentric
rings of cells, at inner openings with straight or convex
walls, rarely with pronounced, rounded processes, and
pores then cruciate; storage tissue often with scattered
sclerotic cells. Scales in 4 rows, covering V4 to 2Aj of ven-
tral face, with oil cells present or absent, median scales
with appendages variously shaped, orbicular, ovate or tri-
angular, apically often acuminate, acute or apiculate, sel-
dom rounded; margins entire, crenulate-serrate, coarsely
toothed or lobed; laminal scales as long as, or longer than
wide, sometimes in 2 incomplete rows on either side of
median scales, apically acute or obtuse, with papillae, up-
per cell walls lacking trigones. Cupules with margins cili-
ate, almost entire, or with ciliate lobes, externally without,
or rarely with papillae.
Dioicous. Antheridiophores with receptacle symmetric
or asymmetric, palmate or rarely peltate, rays shallowly
or deeply dissected; stalks with 2(-4) rhizoid furrows, air
chambers in a single band or absent. Archegoniophores
with receptacle symmetric, or sometimes asymmetric; dis-
sected into 5-9 rays, flat or convex but never terete; scales
of receptacle in African species apically with marginal
cells rectangular and long axis parallel to margins; involu-
cre margins ciliate or crenulate to entire, rarely with ciliate
lobes; stalks with 2 -4 rhizoid furrows, air chambers in 1
or 2 bands. Spores larger than in subgenus Marchantia ,
20-35 pm in diameter; ornamentation on distal face gen-
erally with thick ridges separated by dense granules; on
proximal face with coarse granules only, triradiate mark
and thick wing usually present.
Subgenus Chlamidium contains three sections, Paleaceae,
Chlamidium and Papillatae. Section Paleaceae contains a
single species. Sections Chlamidium and Papillatae are each
represented in southern Africa by a single species.
Marchantia section Paleaceae Bischl. in Bryophy-
torum Bibliotheca 38: 90 (1989a); Bischl.: 67 (1993a).
Type species: M. paleacea Bertol. (lecto. fide Grolle: 210
(1976)].
Thallus with branches (3.5— )6.0— 8.0(— 1 1 .0) mm wide,
irregularly spaced, narrowly divergent. Dorsal epidermis
without papillae; air pores with inner opening cruciate,
inside walls of bordering cells strongly protuberant. Me-
dian scales with appendage oblong, ovate or suborbicular,
apically rounded, acute or shortly apiculate, basally cor-
date, width across broadest part 650-750 pm, margins en-
tire, crenulate or slightly denticulate; with 1, 2 or more
oil cells. Cupules with margins triangularly lobed and cili-
ate, externally with I - or 2-celled papillae.
Dioicous. Antheridiophore on stalk lacking band of air
chambers and basally surrounded by large scales without
an appendage; receptacle peltate, shallowly dissected into
6-10 broad, rounded lobes, dorsal surface without papil-
lae. Arche goniophore on stalk having a single band of
small air chambers, basally surrounded by large scales,
their apices rounded, rarely with a short appendage; re-
ceptacle bearing prominent median projection dorsally,
deeply divided into 8 or more convex lobes, basally
costate, apically truncate or hardly broadened, emarginate;
involucre margin with ciliate lobes. Spores 19-24 pm in
diameter, ornamentation on distal face lacking areolae,
mostly covered with a rather featureless, granular layer or
with very irregular ridges, broken up or folded in or con-
voluted; proximal face different, thickly winged, triradiate
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
193
mark faint, covered with dense granules or centrally with
narrow, irregular granular ridges. Only M. paleacea be-
longs to this section. The ornamentation of its spores is
distinctive. It also differs from the other two sections in
subgenus Chlamidium , by the shape of the female recep-
tacle and by the ciliate, lobed margins of the involucres
and the cupules.
3. Marchantia paleacea Bertol., Opuscoli scienti-
fic! di Bologna 1: 242 (1817); Bischl.: 55 (1984); Bischl
91 (1989a); Bischl.: 68 (1993a) subsp. paleacea. Type;
Italy, Borgonuovo secus valles in Liguria orientali, D.
Turio , 1810 |BOLO, lecto. fide Grolle (1976)].
M. papillata Raddi var. italica Raddi: 20 (1822). Syntypes: Italy,
Contomi di Firenze, Raddi s.n. (BOLO, FH. FI, G, PC, STR).
For the rest of the synonymy see Bischler-Causse (1993a).
Thallus medium-sized to large, firm and occasionally
somewhat leathery, apical segments oblong (Figure 5A),
bright green to slightly bluish green, sometimes blotched
with dark red pigmentation, generally lacking but now and
then with faint, short stretches of dark median band dor-
sally, margins mostly deep red or pink, entire, proximally,
however, undulate and scalloped, pores numerous, small,
generally closed, subdorsal air chamber walls visible from
above and these flecked with numerous white oil bodies,
when wet; thallus margins ± crinkled, not raised or incur-
ved, when dry; in crowded, overlying mats, repeatedly
furcate. Branches with total length up to 45 mm, termi-
nally up to 15 mm long and successive branches rarely
more than 10 mm, but mostly less apart, narrowly diver-
gent, (3.5— )6.0— 8.0(— 1 1.0) mm wide, 750-800 pm thick
over midrib, laterally thinning out into wings (Figure 5C),
apex notched with dark red to marginally orange append-
ages of median scales recurved over edge; margins acute,
thin, flanks sloping obliquely; ventral face (Figure 5B)
dark red entirely or only medianly, and the remainder
green, with 2 rows of scales on either side of ventral keel,
extending over V3— V2 of thallus width.
Dorsal epidennal cells mostly unistratose, here and
there bistratose, hyaline, long-rectangular or polygonal,
(45.0-)60.0-80.0 x 27.5-37.5 pm, walls thin or slightly
thickened, in transverse section 20.0-27.5 pm thick, oil
bodies usually subdermal, almost filling cell, ± 32.5 x
30.0-40.0 pm, dark brown, globular to subglobular; along
margins (Figure 5G) mostly with 3 rows of cells, narrow-
est in outermost row, long rectangular, 17.5-37.5 x ± 5.0
pm, in next row 4- to 6-sided, 30.0-35.0 x ± 12.5 pm,
and in innermost row 30.0-52.5 x 17.5-27.5 pm; air pores
numerous, 192.5-262.5 pm distant from each other,
raised, compound, oval, 40.0-50.0 x 35.0^4-2.5 pm, en-
circled by 4-6(-7) concentric rings of cells, 2 or 3 above
epidermis and up to 4 projecting into air chambers (Figure
5F), innermost ring with collapsed cells, ± 5 pm wide,
uppermost ring with (3)4 or 5 cells, 37.5-62.5 x 7.5 pm,
cells in next ring 37.5^42.5 x 7.5-12.5 pm and in outer
ring, sometimes up to six, 42.5-62.5 x 15.0-22.5 pm (Fig-
ure 5D), inner opening with 4 or 5 cells, inside walls
mostly with granular deposit and strongly protuberant,
leaving only a small cruciate opening (Figure 5Ep Eo).
Assimilation tissue 75.0-100.0 pm thick, '/iQ-'/g as thick
as thallus, air chambers in a single layer, 112.5-187.5 pm
wide, bounding walls 3 or 4(5) cells high, 22.5-35.0 x
20.0- 27.5 pm, crowded with chlorophyllose filaments,
cells mostly irregularly shaped, 17.5-27.5 x 12.5-20.0
pm; storage tissue occupying ventral 7/b-9/|o of thickness
of thallus medianly, decreasing laterally, cells angular,
crowded together, 52.5-67.5 pm wide, walls pitted, central
area sometimes stained purple, sclerotic cells and mucilage
cavities absent in specimens seen, but reportedly sometimes
present; rhizoids mostly smooth, 17.5-27.5 pm wide, occa-
sionally pegged, 10.0-17.5 pm wide.
Median scales (Figure 51) mauve, in one row on either
side of midrib, body ± obliquely triangular, up to 1050
pm long, base arched and continuing into long ‘tail’, when
up to 3250 pm wide, inner cells elongated, 4-6-sided,
52.5- 87.5 x 20.0-25.0 pm, walls straight or somewhat
sinuous toward margin, cells in outer 8 or 9 rows with
thinner, often sinuous walls, orientation very irregular and
smaller in size, 15.0-55.0 x 12.5-20.0 pm, sometimes 3
or 4 marginal cells grouped together and slightly raised
in a little peak from centre of which 1 or 2 slender papillae
project, scattered throughout up to 25 oil cells, ± 37.5 x
27.5 pm, oil body almost filling cell, scale gradually nar-
rowing upwards and then ± 750 pm wide, abruptly deeply
constricted at join with appendage (Figure 5J j , J2), mar-
ginally orange-brown or purplish, internally pink or occa-
sionally hyaline, ovate, oblong or suborbicular, apically
rounded, acute or shortly apiculate, basally cordate, rarely
with small basal lobe, 810-875 x 650-750 pm, inner cells
5- or 6-sided, 65.0-77.5 x 37.5-52.5 pm, with 1, 2 or
more oil cells or even none; margins entire, crenulate or
slightly denticulate, bordered by 1 row of smaller cells,
quadrate to rectangular, sometimes walls sinuose, 17.5-37.5
x 10.0-27.5 pm, orientated parallel to or perpendicular or
oblique to margin, sometimes partly protruding, submarginal
cells ± 62.5 x 27.5 pm. Laminal scales (Figure 5Hj, fL)
mauve or internally mauve and externally hyaline, in one
row on either side of and lateral to, but alternating irregularly
with median scales, ± oblong, but not quite symmetric, base
slightly arched or oblique, 750-1575 x 500-650 pm. cells
in body of scale elongated, 4—6-sided, walls straight or sinu-
ose, 55.0-100.0 x 17.5-27.5 pm, with up to 10 scattered
oil cells, toward margins cells smaller, 17.5-32.5 x
15.0- 25.0 pm, their orientation very variable, a few along
inner sloping margin grouped together and forming indi-
vidual little peaks from tips of which slender papillae pro-
ject. Cupule margins (Figure 5K) with ciliate, ± triangular
lobes, 380^120 pm long and 200-240 pm wide at base,
apically up to 6 cells in a tapering, uniseriate, vertical
row, top cell conical, 25.0-32.5 x 15.0-20.0 pm, lower
cells, 20.0-40.0 x 20.0-25.0 pm, base of lobes broadened
to 6-9 adjacent cells, 4- or 5-sided, 27.5-35.0 x 22.5-27.5
pm, from margins of lobes on both sides, horizontally
projecting, l-3(4)-celled cilia, lower down cupule wall
several cell layers thick, exteriorly with 1- or 2-celled pa-
pillae, up to 37.5 pm long, and internally with numerous
oil cells.
Dioicous. Antheridiophore not seen as none available
for study. Arche goniophore arising from apex of terminal
segment of main or short lateral branches, raised on stalk.
10-1 1 mm long, partly reddish, in transverse section (Fig-
ure 5N), 750 x 700 pm, cortical cells small, 15.0-25.0 x
12.5- 27.5 pm, outer wall thicker, medullary cells rounded,
42.5^t5.0 x 35XM-2.5 pm, smaller cells in between and
at centre of stalk, 12.5-22.5 x 20.0-25.0 pm, with single
194
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
FIGURE 5. — Marchantia paleacea Berlol. A-G, ihallus: A, dorsal lace of apical branch; B, ventral face of apical branch; C, l.s. ol branch; D, air
pore and surrounding cells from above; Ei, E2, air pores from below; F, t.s. ol air pore, dorsal epidermal cells and ait chamber, G, margin.
Hi, Hr, laminal scales; I, median scale; Ji, J 2 , appendages of median scales; K, cupule margin; L, ¥ receptacle from side, M, ¥ receptacle
from above; N, t.s. of ¥ stalk. O-Q, scale: Oi, O2, from foot of ¥ stalk; P1-P3, from along ¥ stalk; Qi, Q2, from ¥ receptacle. R, margin of
involucre. A, Ei, E2, G. I, Ji, J2, Rankin 206; B-D, F, Hi, H2, K, S.M. Perold 3264\ L-R, C. Tavares L1SU P 66716. Scale bars: A, B, L, M,
2 mm; C, 1 mm; D-G, 50 pm; H-K, N-R, 250 pm.
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
195
band of 4 small air chambers, ± 62.5 x 30.0 pm, and 2
rhizoid furrows, lined with purple-walled cells, ± 1 1 2.5 x
72.5 pm, scales at base of stalk (Figure 50], O2) con-
spicuous, brown, rounded or partly 2-lobed or irregularly
shaped, often bulging, without or with short apical ap-
pendage, 1025-1150 x 900-1750 pm, inner cells 5- or
6-sided, 52.5-70.0 x 25.0-32.5 pm, with up to ± 10 oil
cells, 30 x 20 pm, margins ± entire, cells quadrate or
rectangular or irregularly shaped, 22.5-47.5 x 15.0-20.0
pm, long axis orientated parallel or perpendicular to mar-
gins; scales along length of stalk (Figure 5P)— P3) hyaline
or purplish, filiform, up to 1750 pm long, toward apex ±
4 single cells in a row, 67.5-75.0 x 10.0-20.0 pm, lower
down 3 or 4 cells wide, 75.0-132.5 x 20.0-22.5 pm; re-
ceptacle (Figure 5L, M) ± 4 mm in diameter, nearly sym-
metric, dorsally with prominent median projection, deeply
divided into 8 lobes, up to 750 pm long, narrow at base
and some of them wider at ± truncate apex, basal sinus
± 100° wide; involucres with margins (Figure 5R) hyaline
or purplish, divided into narrow lobes ± 500 x 90 pm,
fringed with cilia 180-650 pm long, which consist of sev-
eral cells in a uniseriate row, apical cell ± 75 x 25 pm,
lower cells 82.5-92.5 x 20.0-30.0 pm, toward base often
with 1 or 2 serially arranged transverse cells on one or
both sides, originating at join between 2 successive cells;
scales of receptacle (Figure 5Q 1 , Qt) hyaline or purplish,
filiform, up to 2075 pm long, apically cells in a uniseriate
row, 62.5-85.0 x 12.5-22.5 pm, then 2 cells and eventu-
ally 4 cells wide, up to 92.5 x 25.0 pm. Spores and elaters
not available for study. Chromosome number: n = 9
(Bischler 1984, 1988, 1989a).
Marchantia paleacea has been known since the time
of Micheli ( 1729), who described and illustrated it; but it
was not accepted by Linnaeus (1753). After M. polymor-
pha, it was to become only the second species in the genus
to be recognized from Europe, and was described by Ber-
tolini (1817) from material collected in Italy.
It has been placed in subgenus Chlamidium on account
of the four rows of ventral scales which are restricted to
the median part of the thallus. It is assigned to the mono-
typic section Pcileaceae because of the shape of the female
receptacle, the staicture of the margins of the involucres
and the cupules, which have ciliate lobes (Bischler-Causse
1993a) with papillae externally.
The species has a circumtethyan distribution, ranging
from the southern states of the USA. Mexico and Central
America, to the Mediterranean, the Caucasus, the Hima-
layas, and to the Far East (Bischler 1988). In Africa (and
the neighbouring islands), it is known from Algeria, Ethio-
pia, the Azores. Terceira and Reunion. Bischler-Causse
(1993a) states that its presence on the Canary Islands, Ma-
deira and in Morocco needs confirmation. A specimen
from Madeira, Tavares (LISU) was seen by me, and its
archegoniophores were studied and are illustrated in Fig-
ure 5L-R. The presence of M. paleacea on Madeira is
thus confirmed. Bischler-Causse (1993a) thought that the
single specimen, Rankin 206 (BM), from the vicinity of
Pilgrim’s Rest, South Africa, that she had seen, might have
been mislabelled. A computer printout at PRE, however,
revealed that several other bryophytes were collected by
Rankin in the same area, with collecting numbers both
lower and higher than the one referred to, so that it was
unlikely to have been mislabelled. I have recently also
collected it near Pilgrim’s Rest (Figure 3) on a steep earth
bank of the Blyde River, where it grew down to the
water’s edge together with M. debilis. The plants were
sterile unfortunately, as was Rankin’s collection, but both
had cupules. As noted above, archegoniophores from Ma-
deira were used for the description and illustrations, but
no antheridiophores were available for study.
In the Far East a subspecies, M. paleacea subsp. dip-
terci (Nees & Mont.) Hatt., is recognized (Bischler-Causse
1989a). It is distinguished from subsp. paleacea by the
epidermal pores of the thallus usually being surrounded
by 7 or 8 rings of cells, by the frequent presence of non-
functional female receptacles and by the marginal cells of
the median scale appendage having the long axis oblique
to perpendicular to the margins (not parallel to).
Marchantia paleacea subsp. paleacea is regarded as
morphologically stable and can be distinguished from the
other species of subgenus Chlamidium by its cruciate epi-
dermal pores and its cupules which have margins with
ciliate lobes. The appendage of the median scales is ovate
to orbicular. Schuster ( 1992) regards M. berteroana as the
closest ally to M. paleacea , because it also has cruciate
epidermal pores and its cupules have margins with trian-
gular lobes bearing teeth (or cilia) as well. M. berteroana
is however, classified in subgenus Marchantia.
Marchantia section Chlamidium
Thallus with branches (6.0-)7.0-8.5 (-10.0) mm wide,
generally rather remotely spaced and narrowly divergent.
Dorsal epidermis without papillae; air pores with inner
opening bordered by cells, their inside walls convex to
nearly straight or with short, rounded processes. Median
scales with appendage ovate to orbicular or broadly tri-
angular, apically rarely obtuse, mostly acute, sometimes
shortly apiculate, basally rounded or cordate, width across
broadest part 375-530 pm, margins entire or sometimes
bluntly toothed; with 1 or 2 oil cells, rarely more numer-
ous. Cupules with ciliate margins, cilia up to 6 or 7 cells
long and 3 cells wide basally, exteriorly sometimes also
with several cilia.
Dioicous. Antheridiophore on stalk which mostly lacks
bands of air chambers but with 2 or 3 rhizoid furrows;
basally surrounded by quite large scales, often with an
appendage; receptacle palmate, shallowly to deeply dis-
sected into 6-8 (-10) rays, dorsal surface with or without
papillae. Arche goniophore on stalk having 2 bands of air
chambers and 2 rhizoid furrows; basally surrounded by
quite large scales, often with an appendage and rather
similar to median scales of thallus; receptacle with or
without small, median projection dorsally, shortly divided
into 9-1 1 rather flat lobes, sometimes basally narrow, wid-
ening slightly toward truncate apex; involucre margins
shortly to long ciliate. Spores 20-30 pm in diameter, or-
namentation on distal face with wide, irregular, smooth
ridges forming incomplete areolae filled with nodules;
proximal face entirely covered with nodules.
Of the southern African taxa, only M. pappeana be-
longs in this section. The ornamentation of its spores is
196
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
FIGURE 6. — Marchantia pappeana Lehm. subsp. pappeana. A-G, thallus. A, B, apical branch: A, dorsal face; B, ventral face. C, t.s. ol branch.
D-F, air pore from above; Ei, E2, from below; F, t.s. of dorsal epidermal cells and part of air chamber. G, margin. H-J, scales: Hi . H:, laminal;
1 1 , h, median; J1-J3, appendages of median scales. Ki. K2, margins of cupules; L-Q, receptacles: Li, L2, ¥ from above; M, ¥ from side; N,
cf; O, t.s. of ¥ stalk; P, t.s. of <f stalk; Q, median scale of cf. R-V, scales: R, alongd1 stalk; S, foot of d" stalk; T1-T3, ¥ receptacle; U, toot ot
¥ stalk; V, along ¥ stalk. W, margin of 0" ray; X, margin of involucre. A. G, Hi, I2, J2. Ki, Li, L2, M, T1-T3, X, Koekemoer 1050', B, C, F,
J3, K2, N, Perold & Koekemoer 2918: D, O, V, hurgoyne 2068: Ei, S, H. Anderson 1261 ; E2, 1 1 , J 1 , H2, Perold & Koekemoer 2841 ; P-R, W,
Hilliard & Burn 15460: U, H. Anderson CHI 3278. Scale bars: A, B, L-M, 2 mm; C, I mm; D-G, 50 pm; H-V, X, 250 pm; W, 100 pm.
Bothulia 25,2(1995)
197
referred to as the chenopoda type; there are, however, two
other spore coat ornamentation types in the section (Bischler-
Causse 1989a). The section is distinct in the shape of the
female receptacle and in the ciliate margins of the involucres
and cupules.
4. Marchantia pappeana Lehm. in Novarum et mi-
nus cognitarum stirpium, Pugillus X; 21 (1857); Bischl.:
76 (1993a). Type: South Africa, ‘In Prom. B. S. leg. Pappe’,
ex herb. Lehmann (RO, holo.?; G! ex herb. Univ. di Roma).
M. pappeana subsp. pappeana Bischl.: 82 (1993a).
M. flavescens Steph. in Bonner: 107 (1953). Type:. Fernando Po, 1911
Mildbraed 6275 (G).
M. pan’iloba Steph.: 305 (1895); Vanden Berghen: 46 (1954); S.W.
Amell: 56 (1963). Type: Uganda. Runssoro, um 2 800 m, 10 Juli 1891,
Stuhlmann 2368a (G. lecto. fide Vanden Berghen: 46 (1954); BM,
isolecto. fide Bischl.: 82 (1993a)).
M. planiloba Steph.: 90 (1886); Henriques: '153, 154’; 181, 182
(‘1886’. 1887). Type: Sao Tome, Cachoeira do Rio Manuel Jorge, circa
S. Nicolau, 800 m, 1885. Moller 32 [G, lecto. fide Vanden Berghen: 52
(I960)].
M. planiloba Steph. var. walteri Burgeff: 276 (1943). Type: Tanzania,
‘Nderema in Ost-Usambara, etwa 1 000 m, leg. H. Walter' , syn. fide
Bischl.: 83 (1993a).
M. stephanii Vanden Berghen: 50 (1954) [= M. umbellata Steph.:
305 (1895), nom. illeg.]. Type: Tanzania, Usambara, Holst 692 (FH, G),
syn. fide Bischl.: 83 (1993a).
M. wilmsii Steph: 126 (1892). Type: South Africa, Transvaal. McLea
in Rehmann Hep. austro-afr. exs. I [PC, lecto. fide Vanden Berghen: 44
(1954); BM!, G, NY, S, isolecto. fide Bischl.: 84 (1993a)].
M. winkleri Steph. in Bonner: 112 (1953). Type: Cameroon, Winkler
270 (G).
Thallus medium-sized to large, rather distantly and ir-
regularly branched, not ribbon-like or flat, apical segments
oblong to obovate, light green to yellowish green, often
purplish pink or deeply purple toward margins, or irregu-
larly smudged with purple on dorsal surface, without dark
median band (Figure 6A), margins undulate, scalloped,
usually hyaline, occasionally purple, entire, mostly crisped;
pores quite large and subdorsal air chamber walls visible
from above and flecked with whitish oil cells, when wet;
thallus margins rarely raised, not incurved when dry; in
densely crowded and irregularly overlying mats. Branches
with total length up to 50 mm, terminally 10-15 mm long
and successive branches generally 10-13 mm apart,
mostly narrowly to moderately divergent, (6.0-)7.0-8.5
(-10.0) mm wide, 740-925 pm thick over midrib, laterally
thinning out into wings (Figure 6C); apex notched, with
appendages of purple-brown median scales recurved over
edge (Figure 6A); margins acute, thin; flanks sloping
obliquely; ventral face medianly keeled, with rows of pur-
ple scales on either side, extending over 40-75% of thallus
width (Figure 6B).
Dorsal epidennal cells unistratose, very rarely bi-
stratose in patches, hyaline, mostly 5- or 6-sided (Figure
6D), 42.5-80.0(- 105.0) x 22.5-37.5 pm, thin-walled, not
thickened at comers, rarely containing an oil body, in
transverse section 25.0-32.5 pm thick; along margins
1-2(3) rows of cells, mostly narrowly rectangular (Figure
6G), 22.5-30.0 x 10.0-17.5 pm, sometimes shorter than
broad, ± 17.5 x 35.0 pm, innermost third row of cells
larger, 27.5-32.5 x 27.5 um; air pores fairly numerous, dis-
tance between them (200-)325-575 pm, raised, com-
pound, oval or round, ( 65— )90— 1 05 x 70-100 pm, sur-
rounded by 6 or 7 concentric rings of cells, 3 or 4 above
epidermis and 2 or 3 projecting into air chambers (Figure
6F), innermost ring of upper cells, ± 50.0 x 7.5 pm, next
2 rows of cells ± 40.0 x 7.5-10.0 pm, partly overlying
the outer, larger ring of 7 or 8 polygonal cells, up to 75.0
x 17.5 pm, inner opening with 4 or 5(6) bulging cells
(Figure (6E|, Eo), 30.0-42.5 x 12.5-15.0 pm. inner walls
convex or almost straight, densely covered by dark granules.
Assimilation tissue 60-90 pm thick, V^-’/g as thick as thal-
lus medianly, air chambers in a single layer, with 2 or 3 cells
in vertical bounding walls, 27.5^42.5 x 17.5-30.0 pm, oc-
casionally containing an oil body, ± 35 pm in diameter, air
chambers 275-387 pm wide, crowded with chlorophyllose
filaments (Figure 6F), 1-3-celled, often irregular in shape,
20.0-30.0 x 15.0-17.5 pm; storage tissue occupying ventral
7/8— n/|2 of thickness of thallus medianly, decreasing later-
ally, often with a wide, upper, central, purple-stained band,
cells angular, closely packed, 25-50 pm wide, rather smaller
below, but much larger laterally, sclerotic cells present or
absent, mucilage openings few, up to 200 pm wide, or ab-
sent; rhizoids some smooth, width 1 5 — 45 pm, others pegged,
10-15 pm wide.
Median scales (Figure 61 1, L) purple, in one row on
either side of midrib, body obliquely triangular, 800-1 125
pm high. 1430-1875 pm wide across arched base, mostly
ending below in a long ‘tail’, central cells elongated, 5-
or 6-sided, walls often sinuous, 92.5-107.5 x 30.0-37.5
pm, smaller toward margins and longer and narrower in
‘tail’, oil bodies scattered, margins sometimes with pro-
tniding papillae, ± 50.0 x 12.5 pm, scale narrowing up-
wards, deeply constricted where joined with appendage
(Figure 6J i— J3), purple brown or reddish, ovate to orbicu-
lar or broadly triangular, apically rarely obtuse, mostly
acute, sometimes shortly apiculate, 520-550 x 375-530
pm, apiculus with a vertical row of 2 or 3 cells, 35.0-62.5
x 20.0-27.5 pm, basally rounded or cordate, margins en-
tire or sometimes bluntly toothed, teeth 32.5-50.0 x
20.0-30.0 pm, marginal cells 50.0-62.5 x 17.5-37.5 pm,
only slightly smaller than inner cells, 4-7-sided, 75.0-87.5
x 32.5-42.5 pm, oil cells solitary, rarely more numerous.
Laminal scales (Figure 6Hj, Fh) mauve with hyaline base,
in one row at lateral sides of median scales, obtusely tri-
angular, (750— )980— 1 125 x (360-)630-1075 pm, cells
4-7-sided, 45.0-70.0 x 20.0-27.5 pm, smaller toward
margins, oil cells scattered, appendage lacking, margins
often with protruding papillae. Cupules with margins cili-
ate (Figure 6Kj, Kj), cilia (1 22.5-) 180.0-3 15.0 pm or up
to 6(7) cells long, top cell 45.0-67.5 x 15.0 pm. lower
cells 30.0-75.0 x ( 1 7.5— )22.5— 32.5 pm, basal cells ± 50.0
x 62.5 pm, sometimes 2 adjoining, ± 75.0 x 17.5-30.0
pm, exterior surface occasionally also ciliated.
Dioicous. Antheridiophore arising mostly from apex of
terminal segment of main branch, raised on stalk,
9— 1 8(— 32 ) mm long, diameter 775-925 pm, in transverse
section (Figure 6P) with one row of small cortical cells,
(1 2.5-) 15.0-20.0 x (12.5— )1 5.0—17.0 pm, outer wall
slightly thickened, medullary cells larger, up to 60 pm
wide, but in between with smaller cells, ± 20 pm wide,
air chambers mostly absent, with 2(3) rhizoid furrows, ±
150 pm wide; scales at base of stalk (Figure 6S), 1 or 2,
hyaline, broadly triangular, 1000-1150 x 550-750 pm.
198
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
FIGURE 7. — SEM micrographs of spores. A-E, Marchantia pappeana, H. Anderson CHI 3278: A, distal face; B, part of distal face much enlarged;
C, side view; D, proximal face. E. part of elater, much enlarged. F-I, M. debilis , Preusss.n.: F. distal face; G. part of distal face much enlarged;
H, proximal face; I, part of proximal face, much enlarged. A, x 1233; B, x 2340; C, D, x 1200; E, x 740; F, x 1412; G, I, x 5148; H, x 1373.
sometimes with appendage, ± 675 x 500 pm, partly or
not constricted at base, cells 75-80 x 30-55 pm, slightly
smaller lower down; scales along length of stalk (Figure
6R). narrowly triangular and tapering toward apex, up to
1300 pm long, base ± 175 pm wide, cells 62.5-100.0 x
27.5- 37.5 pm; receptacle 9-14 mm in diameter, palmate,
divided into 6-8 rays (Figure 6N), 1. 7-3.4 mm long, ±
3.5 mm wide, basal sinus 120°-140°, margins of rays red-
dish, undulating, entire (Figure 6W), outer cells long and
narrow, ± 27.5 x 10.0 pm, here and there alternating with
wider cells, 25.0-37.5 x 25.0 pm; median scales on ven-
tral side of rays brownish, obtusely triangular, body ± 750
x 500 pm. cells 55-75 x 25 pm, mostly with appendage
tapering to acute apex (Figure 6Q), 350-375 x 125-250
pm, cells ± 62.5 x 37.5 pm.
Arche goniophore generally arising from apex of termi-
nal segment of main branch, raised on stalk, 1 6— 32(— 60)
mm long, diameter 850-1050 pm, wider across chambers,
± 1250 pm, in transverse section (Figure 60) with one
row of small, rounded, cortical cells, 15.0-25.0 x
12.5- 25.0 pm, outer wall slightly thickened, medullary
cells angular, ± 50 pm wide, with smaller, ± 20 pm wide
cells in between, air chambers in 2 separate and opposite
bands ± 500 pm wide, containing several small air cham-
bers, ± 62 pm high, also with 2 rhizoid furrows, ± 85 x
195 pm; scales at base of stalk, 1 or 2 present (Figure
6U), larger, ± 1350 x 850 pm, shape irregular, cells
87.5- 107.5 x 25.0 pm, often with ± triangular appendage,
slightly constricted at base or hardly so, 750-900 x
500-550 pm, cells 92.5-137.5 x 25.0-37.5 pm, 4-7-sided,
walls straight, shorter along margin, 37.5-42.5 x
37.5- 50.0 pm; scales along length of stalk (Figure 6V),
hyaline strands, 1300-1950 x 70-200 pm, tapering, api-
cally filamentous; receptacle ( 6.5— )8.0— 1 1.0 mm in di-
ameter, sometimes with small, rounded, median projection
dorsally, shortly and ± symmetrically divided into 9-11
lobes (Figure 6L j , L2, M) (occasionally I or 2 lobes re-
placed by male rays), 1.4-1. 7 mm long, base narrow,
1.0-1.25 mm, widening to 2. 1-3.0 mm, toward truncate
apex, basal sinus ± 30°; margins of involucres hyaline,
ciliate (Figure 6X), cilia delicate, sometimes collapsed,
187.5- 200.0 pm long, consisting of cells, 62.5-100.0 x
17.5- 25.0 pm, occasionally base broader, up to 37.5 pm
wide, inner cells angular, 50.0-62.5 x 32.5 pm, with nu-
merous large oil bodies; scales of receptacle mauve or
hyaline, tapering toward apex, sometimes abruptly so, oc-
casionally forked (Figure 6T1-T3), up to 3250 x 250 pm,
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
199
cells 4-7-sided, 75.0-137.5 x 37.5-40.0 |jm, filamentous
apices ± 450 pm long, with apical cell conical, ± 50 x
15 pm, lower cells ± 65 x 30 pm, several oil cells present,
± 50,0 x 32.5 pm, and marginally with unicellular papil-
lae, ± 37.5 x 15.0 pm. Spores 22.5-30.0 pm in diameter,
triangular-globular, yellow-brown, distal face (Figure 7A,
B) with irregular, ± smooth ridges, forming incomplete
areolae filled with nodules; proximal face (Figure 7C, D)
with faint triradiate ridge, each facet densely covered with
nodules, some discrete, others confluent, narrowly winged,
margin entire. Elaters yellow-brown, up to 825 x 7.5 pm,
tapering toward ends, 5.0 pm wide, bispiral (Figure 7E).
Chromosome number, n = 18 (Bischler-Causse 1993a).
Although M. pappeanci had already been described by
Lehmann in 1857 and was mentioned by Stephani
(1898-1900), the name has been neglected by subsequent
authors and specimens in most herbaria, including PRE,
are labelled as M. parviloba, M. planiloba or M. wilmsii.
The species is listed as M. parx’iloba in Magill & Schelpe
(1979). Several authors had suspected, however, that M.
pan’iloba was synonymous with M. planiloba (Vanden
Berghen 1965; Jones & Harrington 1983). Bischler-
Causse (1993a) found that only seven of the 18 specimens
cited by Stephani, belong to M. pappeana and of the 30
kept in his herbarium, only 1 1 belong here.
Amell (1963) mistakenly considered M. pappeana to
be a synonym of M. berteroana. He may, however, have
been misled by a specimen in S (where Lehmann’s origi-
nal collections are kept) which was labelled M. pappeana ,
but actually contains M. berteroana , as was shown by Bis-
chler-Causse (1993a). Amell (1963) merely surmised that
M. parviloba would be found in the northern parts of
South Africa, but he had probably only seen specimens
from Zaire [Congo], Tanzania [Tanganyika] and Zim-
babwe [Southern Rhodesia],
Marchantia pappeana often grows in the same locali-
ties as M. debilis. on vertical soil banks of streams, at
waterfalls, at sluice canals, very rarely on rotting wood or
on rocks, in open grassland or in forests, sometimes in
deep shade.
It is widely distributed in tropical Africa, Bischler-
Causse (1993a) reporting it from the Cape Verde Islands
to Ethiopia and south to southern Africa, generally at an
altitudinal range of 1 000-2 500 m. In southern Africa
(Figure 8) it is known from the Northern Province [North-
ern Transvaal] and Eastern Transvaal, Gauteng [PWV],
Swaziland, Kwazulu-Natal, eastern [Orange] Free State
and Lesotho. It has also been collected at Kirstenbosch
Botanical Garden a number of times and the type speci-
men is from Promontorium Bonae Spei.
Of the 50 specimens examined, 62% had cupules, 20%
had antheridiophores and 34% had archegoniophores; only
6% had both. Morphologically the species is variable, ex-
hibiting this trait even among specimens from the same
geographical area. Generally, however, it can be distin-
guished by being larger than M. debilis and by lacking a
dark median line on the dorsal surface of the thallus; its
median scale appendages are large and often marginally
toothed, with the inner cells large, presenting a ‘loose’
appearance; its cupules have longer cilia; the female re-
ceptacle is shortly divided into rays and the involucral
margin is ciliate; androgynous branches in the female re-
ceptacle are sometimes present.
Marchantia pappeana subsp. pappeana is distin-
guished from M. pappeana subsp. robusta , a close relative
in South India and Sri Lanka, by the latter having numer-
ous sclerotic cells and mucilage cavities in the thallus; oil
bodies in the median scale appendages are, however, ab-
sent.
Marchantia section Papillatae Bischl. in Cryp-
togamie, Bryologie et Lichenologie 10: 69 ( 1989); Bischl.:
99 (1993a). Type: M. papillata Raddi (PI, lecto., Bischl.:
95(1984).
Thallus with branches rather narrow, (2.1-)4.5-7.3 mm
wide, ribbon-like, often quite regularly spaced, moderately
to widely divergent. Dorsal epidermis without papillae;
air pores with inner opening bordered by cells, their inside
walls convex or straight. Median scales with appendage
orbicular or ovate, apically acute or apiculate, seldom ob-
tuse, basally rounded, width across widest part 275-340
pm, margins toothed; oil cells absent. Cupule margins
with short cilia, 3(4) cells long and I or 2 cells wide
basally, external surface without papillae.
Dioicous. Antheridiophore on stalk without or with 1
or 2 bands of much reduced air chambers and 2 rhizoid
fuiTows, basally surrounded by smaller, narrowly triangu-
lar scales, sometimes divided above into filamentous seg-
ments; receptacle smallish, palmate, asymmetric and
deeply divided into (4 — )5— 7 rays, dorsal surface without
papillae. Arche goniophore on stalk with single band of air
chambers (in African taxon) and 2 rhizoid furrows; basally
surrounded by smaller, ± triangular scales, gradually ta-
pering to filiform apex; receptacle smallish, with a
rounded median projection dorsally, deeply divided into
8-10 lobes, basally convex and costate, apically broad-
ened; involucre margins entire or crenulate. Spores 25-32
pm in diameter, ornamentation on distal face with irregu-
lar coarse ridges, forming incomplete areolae filled with
granules: proximal face densely verrucose.
FIGURE 8. — Distribution of M. pappeana var. pappeana. □: and M.
debilis. •. in southern Africa
200
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
FIGURE 9. — Marchantia debilis Goebel. A-G, thallus. A, B, apical branch: A, dorsal face, with cupules; B, ventral face. C, t.s. of branch; D-F, air
pore: D, from above; Ei, E2, from below; F, t.s. of dorsal epidermal cells and air chamber. G, margin. Hi, H2, laminal scales; 1 1 , 12, median
scales; J 1 , J2, appendages of median scales; Ki, K2, margins of cupules. L-Q, receptacles: Li, L2, ¥ from above; M, ? from side; N, <f. O,
t.s. of d" stalk; P, t.s. of ¥ stalk; Qi, Q2, median scales of 0" ray. R-V, scale: R, along <f stalk; S, along ¥ stalk; T, base of ¥ stalk; U, base of
stalk; V 1-V3, ¥ receptacle. W, margin of 0" ray; X, margin of involucre. A, H. Anderson CHI223; B, R, U, W, X, Mogg 6172; C-G, H2,
.1 1 , Ki, Condy 90; Hi, li, I2, K2, Bester2544\ J2, Glen 1940; Li, L2, M, P, S, T, Dieterlen 850; N, Sim CH1345; O, S.M. Perold2891; Qi, Q2,
V1-V3, S.M. Perold 3048. Scale bars: A-B, L-N, 2 mm; C, I mm; D-G, 50 pm; H-K2, O-V3, 250 pm; W, X, 100 pm.
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
201
Only M. clebilis of the southern African taxa belongs
to this section. Bischler-Causse (1993a) states that it is
closest to the Asiatic species, M. emarginata subsp.
toscinci. The ornamentation of the spores is of the papillata
type. The section differs from sect. Paleaceae and sect.
Chlamidium in the shape of the female receptacle, with
the lobes costate basally and broadened apically.
5. Marchantia debilis Goebel in Organographie der
Pflanzen. 1. Bryophyten 2, edn 2: 901 (1915); Bischl.:
100 (1993a). Type: Cameroon, Urwaldgebiet von Bipindi,
Zenker, Flora von Kamerun exs. 1339 (BM!, BR, E, F, G,
GOET, M, S, iso.).
M. chevalieri Steph. in Bonner: 103 (1953). Type: Ivory Coast, Haute
Cote d'Ivoire, pays Dijola, environs de Ona, 4-1909, Chevalier s.n. (G,
PC).
Thallus smallish to medium-sized, rather flat and rib-
bon-like, apical segments oblong or broadly lingulate,
green or occasionally purplish all over, when much ex-
posed to bright sun, usually with a narrow, dark, broken,
longitudinal median band dorsally (Figure 9A), margins
narrowly reddish purple or hyaline, entire; pores quite
small, subdorsal air chamber walls visible from above,
when wet; thallus margins not raised or incurved, some-
times with slight longitudinal indentation along midline
and apex occasionally incurved, when dry; in crowded,
overlying patches or occasionally in partial rosettes, up to
75 mm across, repeatedly pseudodichotomously furcate,
often rather regularly. Branches with total length up to ±
38 mm, terminally 5-12 mm long and successive branches
5 — 7( — 9) mm apart, mostly moderately to widely divergent,
4.5-7. 3 mm wide, 675-850 pm thick over midrib, laterally
thinning out into wings (Figure 9C); apex notched, with
appendages of several reddish brown or purplish median
scales recurved over edge; margins acute, thin, occasion-
ally slightly crisped, flanks sloping obliquely; ventral face
medianly keeled and densely covered with long strands
of rhizoids, on either side with rows of purple scales ex-
tending over 70% or more of thallus width (Figure 9B).
Dorsal epidermal cells unistratose, rarely bistratose in
patches, mostly hyaline, polygonal, ( 4— )5— 7-sided,
37.0-62.5 x 22.0-32.0 pm, thin-walled, not thickened at
comers, in transverse section ± 17.5 pm thick, occasion-
ally containing a round oil body, ± 37.5 pm in diameter,
along margin 2 rows of narrow, ± rectangular cells,
(10.0-)20.0-30.0(-37.5) x (7.5— )12.5— 17.5 pm (Figure
9G), innermost third row of cells mostly larger, 30.0-37.5
x 15.0-22.5 pm; air pores quite numerous, (100-)
215-275(^475) pm distant from each other, raised, com-
pound, oval, 37.5-62.5 x 40.0-52.5 pm, surrounded by
(4)5 or 6 concentric rings of cells (Figure 9D), 2 or 3
above epidermis and 2 or 3 projecting into air chambers
(Figure 9F), innermost ring of upper cells ± 7.5 pm wide,
cells of middle ring ± 12.5 pm wide and outermost ling
with 6 or 7 larger cells, 35.0-62.5 x 17.5-22.5 pm, some-
what variable in shape and partly overlying epidermal
cells, inner opening (Figure 9Ep E2) with 4 or 5 rather
swollen cells, 20-25 x 35-42 pm, their inside walls ±
convex or nearly straight. Assimilation tissue up to 150
pm thick, ± '/g as thick as thallus, air chambers in a single
layer (Figure 9F), ( 1 05—) 1 50—300 pm wide, cells in
bounding walls ± 32.5 x 17.5 pm, crowded with densely
chlorophyllose, mostly 3-celled filaments, cells ± 20 x
15-25 pm; storage tissue occupying ventral 5/() of thick-
ness of thallus medianly, decreasing laterally, cells angu-
lar, medianly ± 50 pm wide, compact, much enlarged
laterally, sclerotic cells and mucilage cavities usually ab-
sent; rhizoids some smooth, 12.5-25.0 pm, others pegged,
5.0- 12.5 pm wide.
Median scales (Figure 91 1 , I2) brownish or purplish, in
one row on either side of midrib, body ± obliquely trian-
gular, up to 625 pm long, base slightly arched, its width
up to 3000 pm, central cells 4—6-sided, walls often sinu-
ous, 65.0-87.5 x 17.5-27.5 pm, elongating and narrowing
into long ‘tail’, ( 1 00.0—) 1 37.5—1 82.5 x 12.5-17.5 pm, oil
bodies scattered, upper margins of scale serrate, as it nar-
rows and becomes constricted where joined with append-
age (Figure 9Jp J2), mauve generally, orbicular or ovate,
apically acute or apiculate, rarely rounded, 350-375 x
275-340 pm, median cells 67.5 — 75.0 x 30.0-37.5 pm,
smaller at toothed margin, ± 42.5 x 25.0 pm, teeth conical.
I -celled, ± 37.5 x 20.0, or 2-celled, 45.0-62.5 x 15.0-42.5
pm, oil bodies absent. Laminal scales (Figure 9Hp Fh)
brownish, in one row on lateral sides of median scales, ±
ovate, rounded apically, lacking appendage, 450-560 x
430-670(-900) pm, sometimes with short ‘tail’ (Figure
9Hj), cells (50.0-)58. 5-67.5 x 17.5-25.0 pm, walls often
sinuous, oil bodies rare or absent, sometimes with mar-
ginal papillae, 50.0 x 12.5 pm. Cupules with margins
shortly ciliate (Figure 9K], K2), some cilia unicellular,
others 3 cells and up to 75 pm long, apical cells conical,
20-30 x 15 pm, basally 1 or 2 cells wide.
Dioicous. Antheridiophore arising from apex of termi-
nal segment of main branch or of short lateral branch, on
stalk (2.5— )7.0— 1 6.0 mm long, diameter 625-700 pm, in
transverse section (Figure 90) with 1 row of cortical cells,
17.5-22.5 x 10.0-17.5 pm, outer wall curved, medullary
cells angular, many up to 50 pm wide, but in between
smaller cells, only 17.5 pm wide, air chambers much re-
duced, in single band, rhizoid furrows 2, ± 160 pm wide;
scales at base of stalk (Figure 9LJ ), narrowly triangular,
750-1250 pm long and 150-500 pm wide at base, some-
times ± midway divided into (2)3 segments, only central
part elongated and tapering to filamentous apical string
of ± 5 single cells, top cell ± 30 x 10 pm, basal one ±
45.0 x 27.5 pm, cells in body of scale ± 92.5 x 27.5 pm,
margin with a few papillae, 37.5 x 7.5 pm; scales along
length of stalk filiform (Figure 9R), up to 1 100 x 50 pm,
2 or 3 cells wide, except for apical row of up to 5 single
cells, and sometimes basally with short cellular strands at
sides of long main one; receptacle 7.5-9.0 mm in diame-
ter, asymmetric, above without antheridial papillae, di-
vided into (4)5-7 rays (Figure 9N), 1. 5-3.0 mm long and
± 1.2 mm wide at base, narrowing slightly to tip, basal
sinus ± 130°, margins undulating, entire (Figure 9W), hya-
line, cells in 1 or 2 rows, rectangular, 17.5-32.5 x
10.0- 25.0 pm; median scales on ventral side of rays (Fig-
ure 9Qi, Q2) hyaline or mauve, obtusely triangular, up to
1000 x 670 pm, cells 4-6-sided, 35.0-62.5(- 100.0) x
20.0- 27.5 pm, at margin with some papillae, sometimes
with an apical appendage, constricted at its base or not,
narrowly to broadly triangular, 300-430-x 100-200 pm,
brownish with mauve cell walls, cells 50-60 x 25-35 pm,
smaller toward apex, 20 x 15-22 pm.
202
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
Arche goniophore at apex of terminal segment of main
branch or of short lateral branch, raised on stalk, 9-16
mm long, diameter 400-550 pm, in transverse section
(Figure 9P) with 1 row of cortical cells, ± 12.5 x 22.5
pm, medullary cells 22-40 x 15-30 pm, with 2 rhizoid
furrows, ± 75 x 130 pm, and mostly a single band of air
chambers, the latter up to 85.0 x 37.5 pm each, rarely 2
bands or a split band present; scale(s) at base of stalk
(Figure 9T), brownish, ± triangular, 900-1000 x 400-450
pm, apex filiform with 3 or 4 single cells in a row, ± 32.5
x 12.5 pm, then widening gradually below, upper cells
thick-walled, 50.0-55.0 x 27.5-37.5 pm, thinner-walled
below, sometimes with short appendage at the side; scales
along length of stalk (Figure 9S) scattered, ± 700 x 112
pm, narrowing above to ± 35 pm wide, cells ± 75 x 15
pm; receptacle (3.5M-.5-7.CK9.0) mm in diameter, dor-
sally with a rounded projection medianly (Figure 9Lj, L2,
M) and deeply divided into 8-10 lobes, 0.8-1.25 mm long,
narrower at base and widening toward apex, basal sinus
40°-60°; margins of involucres hyaline, entire or crenu-
late, cells rectangular across to 5-sided (Figure 9X),
15.0-22.5 x 27.5-37.5 pm; scales of receptacle (Figure
9V1-V3) hyaline or yellow-brown or purple, 800-1000 x
330-370 pm, irregularly shaped, cells 75.0-100.0 x
37.5—42.5 pm, 5- or 6-sided, thick-walled, at basal margin
smaller, ± 32.5 x 15.0 pm, thin-walled and sinuous, at
apex 3 cells in a row, top cell conical, 40-75 x 10-12
pm, gradually widening lower down and sometimes with
filiform appendage at the side. Spores 25.0-32.5 pm in
diameter, faintly triangular-globular, brown, distal face
(Figure 7F, G) with irregular, coarse ridges, forming in-
complete areolae, spaces between filled with granules;
proximal face (Figure 7H, I) with triradiate mark hardly
visible, facets densely verrucose. Elaters brown, up to 295
x ± 7.5 pm, bispiral. Chromosome number: n = 9 (Bischler-
Causse unpublished).
Bischler-Causse (1993a) states that this species, which
is confined to Africa, has not been mentioned since its
description by Goebel (1915) and that it occurs in various
herbaria under 14 different names, but most commonly
under M. wilmsii , M. planiloba and M. chevalieri. She
also remarked that most authors considered M. chevalieri
to be a synonym of M. wilmsii , but the lectotype of M.
wilmsii (McLea!, syntype of Rehmann exsiccate) selected
by Vanden Berghen (1954), belongs to M. pappeana and
is an unfortunate choice.
The syntypes of M. wilmsii cited by Stephani are
McLea in Rehmann Hep. austro-a.fr exs. I and ‘Prope
Lydenburg et Greytown Dr Wilms’. Bischler-Causse
(1993a) states that the McLea specimens are male and
correspond to M. pappeana ; the Wilms specimens from
Lydenburg are female with cupules, or are sterile and also
belong to M. pappeana , whereas the Greytown specimens
are male with cupules and contain M. debilis. Bischler-
Causse (1993a) concludes that Stephani probably had M.
pappeana in mind, and not M. debilis, since he clearly
described M. pappeana under the epithet M. wilmsii. In
Stephani’s herbarium, she found that 13 of the 16 'M.
wilmsii ’ specimens belong to M. pappeana and only three
to M. debilis.
It is indeed fortunate that Bischler, with her long and
intimate experience with Marchantia species, was able to
resolve the taxonomy of this species, since neither Vanden
Berghen ( 1 954, 1 965 ), nor Arnell ( 1 963 ) nor Jones & Har-
rington (1983) managed to do so. Jones & Harrington
( 1 983) regarded 'M. wilmsii ’ as the commonest Marchan-
tia species in tropical Africa and readily recognizable by
the presence of the dark dorsal line. Specimens held at
PRE, that belong here, were mostly identified as M. wilm-
sii. The species is also listed as such in Magill & Schelpe
(1979) and in Arnold & De Wet (1993).
Marchantia debilis generally grows on damp soil on
vertical stream banks or waterfalls, on mud (or occasion-
ally on stones) of stream beds, at weirs, or sluice canals,
on stone dam walls kept wet by spray, and on soil over-
lying sandstone or granite, in open grassland or in forests,
sometimes in partial shade.
It is widely distributed in Africa, Bischler-Causse
(1993b) stating it to occur from Morocco to South Africa,
as well as on Reunion and also in the eastern part of
Madagascar. In southern Africa (Figure 8) it occurs in the
summer rainfall areas of the Northern Province [Northern
Transvaal] and Eastern Transvaal, Gauteng [PWV],
Swaziland, Kwazulu-Natal, eastern [Orange] Free State,
Lesotho and Eastern Cape.
Most of the 98 specimens examined had cupules, but
only 10% had antheridiophores and 16% had archegonio-
phores; 3% had both.
Sterile plants of M. debilis can be distinguished from
M. pappeana , the species it has frequently been confused
with, by the smaller size of the rather ribbon-like thallus,
by the dark median line on the dorsal face of the thallus,
by the smaller appendages of the median scales and by
the shortly ciliate or almost entire margins of the cupules.
Fertile plants should present no problem to identify as the
smallish male and female receptacles, the latter with
deeply divided lobes, are quite distinctive and the margin
of the involucre is entire.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I wish to sincerely thank Dr H. Bischler-Causse for
refereeing this paper and for her helpful suggestions; the
curators of BM, BOL, BR, G, LISU and W for the loan
of specimens; my colleagues at NBI for collecting speci-
mens; the artist, Mrs M. Steyn; the typist, Mrs J. Mul-
venna, and the photographer, Mrs A. Romanowski, for
their valued contributions.
REFERENCES
ARNELL, S.W. 1963. Hepaticae of South Africa. Swedish Natural Sci-
ence Council, Stockholm.
ARNOLD, T.H. & DE WET. B.C. 1993 (eds). Plants of southern Africa:
names and distribution. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South
Africa No. 62.
ASAKAWA, Y„ OKADA, K. & PEROLD, G.W. 1988. Distribution of
cyclic bis (bibenzyls) in the South African liverwort Marchantia
polymorpha. Phytochemistry 27: 161-163.
BERTOLON1, A. 1817. Fine delle osservazioni botaniche dal Professore
A. Bertoloni. Opuscoli scientifwa di Bologna 1: 229-243.
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
203
BISCHLER, H. 1982. Marchantia L.: morphologie sporale, germination
et rang taxonomique des sect. Marchantia et Chlamidium (Corda)
Nees. Cryptogamie, Bryologie et Lichenologie 3: 351-364.
BISCHLER, H. 1984. Marchantia L. The New World species. Bryophy-
torum Bibliotheca 26.
BISCHLER, H. 1988. Marchantia paleacea Bertol. — karyotype analysis.
Beiheft zur Nova Hedwigia 90: 95-100.
BISCHLER-CAUSSE, H. 1989a. Marchantia L.: the Asiatic and Oceanic-
species. Bryophytorum Bibliotheca 38.
BISCHLER-CAUSSE, H. 1989b. Marchantia L. subg. Chlamidium
(Nees) Bischl. Sect. Papillatae Bischl. sect. nov. en Asie et en
Oceanie. Cryptogamie, Bryologie et Lichenologie 10: 61-79.
BISCHLER-CAUSSE, H. 1993a. Marchantia L.: the European and Afri-
can taxa. Bryophytorum Bibliotheca 45.
BISCHLER-CAUSSE, H. 1993b. Taxonomic results of the BRYOTROP-
Expedition to Zaire and Rwanda. 6. Marchantiaceae. Tropical
Bryology 8: 54.
BISCHLER-CAUSSE, H. 1993c. Review: The Hepaticae and Antho-
cerotae of North America, Vols. 5 & 6, by R.M. Schuster. The
Bryologist 96: 28 1 .
BISCHLER-CAUSSE, H. & BOISSELIER-DUBAYLE, M.C. 1991.
Lectotypification of Marchantia polymorpha L. Journal of Bryol-
ogy 16: 361-365.
BISCHOFF, G.W. 1846. In C.F.F. Krauss, Pflanzen des Cap- und Natal-
Landes gesammelt und zusammengestellt von Dr. Ferdinand
Krauss. Flora 29: 129-138.
BONNER, C.E.B. 1953. De Hepaticis II. An unpublished section of
Volume 6 of Stephani’s Species Hepaticarum: the genus Mar-
chantia. Candollea 14: 101-112.
BURGEFF, H. 1943. Genetische Studien an Marchantia. Jena, Fischer.
CAMPBELL, E.O. 1965. Marchantia species of New Zealand. Tuatara
13: 122-136.
CORDA, A.J.C. 1829. Genera Hepaticarum: Die Gattungen der Leber-
moose. In PM. Opiz, Beitrage zur Naturgeschichte 12: 643-655.
DILLENIUS, J.J. 1741. Historia muscorwn : t. 76, fig. 6E. F. Oxford.
DLIMORTIER, B.C.J. 1874. Hepaticae Europae. Bulletin de la Societe
Roy ale de Botanique de Belgique 13: 1-203.
DOUIN, C & DOUIN, R. 1918. Le Reboulia Raddi. Revue generate de
botanique 30: 129-145.
ENGEL. J.J. 1990. Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas) Hepaticae and An-
thocerotophyta: a taxonomic and phytogeographic study. Fieldi-
ana, Botany, New Series 25: 1-209.
EVANS, A.W. 1917. The American species of Marchantia. Transactions
of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Science 21: 201-313.
GOEBEL. K. 1915. Organographie der Pflanzen. 1. Bryophyten 2 , edn 2:
515-902.
GOTTSCHE. C.M., LINDENBERG. J.B.G. & NEES AB ESENBECK,
C.G. 1844-1847. Synopsis hepaticarum. Meissner, Hamburg.
GROLLE, R. 1976. Verzeichnis der Lebermoose Europas und benachbar-
terGebiete. Feddes Repertorium 87: 171-279.
HASSEL DE MENENDEZ, G.G. 1963. Estudio de las Anthocerotales y
Marchantiales de la Argentina. Opera Lilloana 7: 1-297.
HENRIQUES, J.A. '1886'. 1887. In Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana 4:
153, 154, 181, 182.
ISOVIITA, P. 1970. Dillenius’s Historia Muscorum as the basis of hepatic
nomenclature and S.O. Lindberg's collection of Dillenian Bryo-
phytes. Acta Botanica Fennica 89: 1—28.
JONES, E.W. & HARRINGTON, A.J. 1983. The hepatics of Sierra
Leone and Ghana. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural His-
tory) (Botany) 11: 215-289.
LEHMANN, J.G.C. 1834. Novarum et minus cognitarum stirpium.
Pugillus VI. Meissner, Hamburg.
LEHMANN, J.G.C. 1857. Novarum et minus cognitarum stirpium.
Pugillus X. Meissner, Hamburg.
LEMAN, D.S. 1823. Cryptogames. In Dictionnaire des sciences
naturelles dans lequel on traite methodiquement des differents
etres de la nature.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum. Bradbury & Evans, London.
MAGILL, R.E. & SCHELPE, E.A. 1979. The bryophytes of southern
Africa. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 43:
1-39.
MARCHANT, M. (fd.) 1739. Nouvelle decouverte des fleurs et des
graines d’une plante rangee par les botanistes sous le genre Li-
chen. Memoire de I’Histoire de P Academic Royale des Sciences,
Paris 1713: 229-234.
MARKHAM. K.R.. PORTER, L.J. & CAMPBELL, E.O. 1977. The
usefulness of flavonoid characters in studies of the taxonomy and
phylogeny of liverworts. Bryophytorum Bibliotheca 13: 387-398.
MICHELI, P.A. 1729. Nova plantarum genera. Florintiae, Paperini.
NEES AB ESENBECK, C.G. 1838. Naturgeschichte der europaischen
Lebermoose 4.
RADDI, G. 1818. Novarum vel rariorum ex Cryptogamia stirpium in agro
Florentino collectarum Decades duae. Opuscoli scientifica di Bo-
logna 2: 349-361 .
RADDI. G. 1822. Crittogame Brasiliane raccolte e descritte dal Signor
Guiseppe Raddi. Memorie della Societa italicma della Scienze
resident e in Modena 19: 27-57.
SCHIFFNER, V.F. 1896. Kritische Bemerkungen fiber Marchantia
Berteroana Lehm. et Lindenb. und Marchantia tabularis Nees ab
Esenb. Osterreichische Botanische Zeitung 46: 41^14. 100-103.
SCHUSTER, R.M. 1992. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of North
America, east of the Hundredth Meridian. Vol. 6. Field Museum
of Natural History, Chicago.
SIM, T.R. 1926. The Bryophyta of South Africa. Transactions of the
Royal Society of South Africa 20: 1—475.
STEPHANI. F. 1886. Hepaticae. In J. Henriques. Flora da Sao Tome.
Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana 4: 170-184.
STEPHANI, F. 1892. Hepaticae africanae. III. Hedwigia 31: 120-130.
STEPHANI, F. 1895. Hepaticae africanae. Botanische Jahrbiicher 20:
299-321.
STEPHANI, F. 1898-1900. Species hepaticarum. Bulletin de THerbier
Boissier, Set. 1, Vol. 6: 383-533.
VANDEN BERGHEN. C. 1954. Le genre Marchantia L. au Congo
Beige. Bulletin du Jardin botanique de I'Etat, a Bruxelles 24:
37-50.
VANDEN BERGHEN, C. 1960. Hepatiques recoltees en Afrique par M.
Monod. Revue bryologique et lichenologique 39: 50-67.
VANDEN BERGHEN, C. 1965. Hepatiques recoltees par le Dr J.J.
Symoens dans la region peri-tanganyikaises. Bulletin de la So-
ciete Royale de Botanique de Belgique 98: 129-174.
VANDEN BERGHEN, C. 1972. Hepatiques et Anthocerotees. Resultats
scientifiques de T exploration hydrobiologique du Bassin Lac
Bangweolo & Luapula 8: 1-202.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
H. Anderson 1223 (5), CH4497 (5), CH4501 (4), CH 13278 (4),
CHI 3279 (5) PRE. S.W Amell 1058 (2) BOL (sub M. tabularis)-, 1075
(2) BOL; 1234 (5) BOL.
Barnard CH 1315 (sub M. tabularis) (2) PRE. Bester 2544 (5) PRE.
Bews CH1321 (sub M. tabularis) (2). CH1348 (5) PRE. Bingham 8181
(5) (Zambia) PRE. Bolus CH1319 (sub M. tabularis) (2) PRE. Bosnian
CH195 (5) PRE. Bottomley CHI 335 (sub M. wilmsii) (4) PRE. Breutel
s.n. (2) W. Burgoyne 1588, 2068 (4) PRE. Bunt Davy 435 (5) PRE.
Child 262 11 (2) BOL. Cholnoky 929 (sub M. wilmsii) (4) PRE. Condx
90 (5), CH 13638 (4) PRE.
204
Bothalia 25,2 ( 1995)
Dieterlen 850 (sub M. polymorpha ) (5) PRE. Doidge CH54 (2) PRE.
Drege s.n., 8286 (2) W. Duthie CH 1320 (sub M. tabularis ) (2) PRE.
Ecklnn 8284, 8289 W; G546, G2072/7G (typus) (2) G. Edwards
CHI 346 (sub M. wilmsii) (4) PRE. Esterhuysen 34979a (2) BOL. Eyles
CH1311 (sub M. tabularis) (2) PRE.
Garside 6186 (2) PRE. Geldenhuys 1061, 1332 (2) PRE. Ger-
mishuizen 4411, 6031 (5) PRE. Gerstner 583 (5) PRE. Glen 1690, 1940,
2189, 2207 pp. (5) PRE; 2207 pp. (4) PRE; 3007 (5) PRE; 3009, 3012,
3125a (4) PRE; 3468, 3728 (1) PRE. Guthrie 52555 (2) BOL.
Hepburn CH1223, CH1343 (5) PRE. Hilliard & Bunt 15460 (sub
M. wilmsii) (4) BOL.
Kluge 2442 (5) PRE. Koekemoer 1049 (5), 1050 (4) PRE. Krauss
8291 (sub M. contracta) (2) G.
Lambert 7 (5) PRE. Lanham 72 (sub M. polymorpha) (4) PRE.
Leendertz 755c (sub M. polymorpha) (5) PRE. Lubenau-Nestle SA269
(5) PRE.
McLea in Rehmann exs. 1 (sub M. wilmsii) (4) BM. Marais ( Duthie
5163) (sub M. wilmsii) (4) BOL. Mogg CH159 (2) PRE; CH1193,
CH4150, 4227, 6172 (5) PRE. Moonsammy 17 (NH 16194) (sub M.
wilmsii ) (4) PRE. Morley 298 (2) PRE.
Oliver 54680 (2) BOL. Onderstall 314 (5) PRE.
Pappe s.n. (typus) (4) G, RO. Pattison 14479 (2) BOL. J.J. Perold,
CH13644 (4) PRE. S.M. Perold, 41, 154, 164, 166, 168, 245, 1073 (5)
PRE; 2500 (4) PRE; 2549 (2) PRE; 2675 (Malawi), 2701, 2891 (5) PRE;
2926 (4) PRE; 2945, 3048, 3239, 3245 (5) PRE; 3246, 3250, 3251 (4)
PRE; 3252 (5) PRE; 3260a (4) PRE; 3261-3263 (5) PRE; 3264, 3265
(3) PRE; 3266 (5) PRE; 3267, 3268 (4) PRE. Perold & Koekemoer 2841,
2848 (4) PRE; 2869, 2875, 2893, 2897 (5) PRE; 2918 (4) PRE; 3181
(5) PRE; 3181a (4) PRE; 3248 (Ledbury, England), 3249 (Wageningen,
Netherlands), CHI 3640 (1) PRE. Pillans 4047, 4048, 4233 (2) BOL.
Playford CH 1324 (sub M. wilmsii) (4) PRE. Pole-Evans 461 (5), CHI 351
(sub M. wilmsii) (4) PRE. Pone r CH3586 (5) PRE. Potts 27, CHI 3 12
(2) PRE. Preiss 8282 (2) PRE. Preuss 1192 (Cameroon) (5) BM.
Rankin 206 (3) BM. C. Reid 816 (5) PRE. Reichenbach 354137 (2)
W. Reinecke CHI 74 (5) PRE. Rennie & Lambert 22 (sub M. polymorpha)
(4) PRE. Rogers TM 2269 (sub M. polymorpha) (4) PRE.
Scheepers 562 (sub M. wilmsii) (4) PRE. Schelpe 2048 (5) BOL;
4226 (sub M. wilmsii) (2) BOL; 3745 (sub M. wilmsii (4) BOL; 5359
(sub M. parviloba) (Zimbabwe) (4) BOL; 25367, 52542 (sub M. wilm-
sii) (2) BOL. Scott CH3693 ( 5) PRE. T.R. Sim CH1313, CH1316-
CH1318, CH1322 (sub M. tabularis) (2) PRE; CH1323 (sub M. wilmsii)
(4) PRE; CHI 325-CH 1327, CH1329, CH1330, CH1333 (5) PRE;
CH1339, CHI 341 (sub M. wilmsii (4) PRE; CH1342, CH1344, CH1345
(5) PRE; CH1347 (sub M. wilmsii) (4) PRE; CH1352, CH1353 (5)
PRE; CHI 356, CHI 358 (sub M. wilmsii) (4) PRE. SL CHI 308 (2) PRE.
Smook 8746 (2) PRE. Stokoe 9468 (sub M. wilmsii) (2) BOL. Strauss
CH13641 (4) PRE. Symons CH1337 (5) PRE.
C. Tavares, P 66716 (3) LISU. Theron 1339 (5) PRE. Thorne
CHI 309, CHI 544, CH3153 (2) PRE.
Univ. Durban-Westville 54 (5) PRE.
Van Breda 1116 (2) PRE. Van der Bijl CH1332, CH1349, CH1354,
NHI6171, NH 16175 (5) PRE. Van Rooy 1012 (5), 1653 (4), 2624 (5)
PRE. A.E. Van Wvk 2066 (2) PRE. Y. Van Wyk 883 (2) PRE. Veltman 3,
5 (4) PRE; 12 (5), 90 (4) PRE. Venter 12200 (5) PRE. Vorster 1785,
1789 (5) PRE.
Wager CH3805 (sub M. wilmsii) (4) PRE. Wagener CH 13341 (2)
PRE. Wawra 10 (2) W.
Zenker 1339 (5) (typus) BM; 1898 (5) BR.
Bothalia 25,2: 205-209 (1995)
New combinations and a complete list of Asparagus species in southern Africa
(Asparagaceae)
A.C. FELLINGHAM* and N.L. MEYER**
Keywords: Asparagaceae, Asparagus , new combinations, southern Africa, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
With only flower sexuality differing, Protasparagus can not be separated from Asparagus , neither at generic nor at
subgeneric level. No significant differences in the degree to which filaments were connivent were observed between species
placed under Myrsiphyllum and those under Protasparagus/ Asparagus. All southern African species of Asparagaceae are
therefore reinstated under Asparagus and listed here without recognition of subgenera. Several new combinations are made.
UITTREKSEL
Met slegs die geslagtelikheid van die blomme wat verskil, kan Protasparagus nie van Asparagus geskei word nie, nog op
genus- nog op subgenusvlak. Geen noemenswaardige verskille in die mate waartoe helmdrade saamneigend is, is waargeneem
tussen spesies wat onder Myrsiphyllum geplaas is en die onder Protasparagus/Asparagus nie. Alle Suider-Afrikaanse spesies
van Asparagaceae word dus heringestel onder Asparagus en hier gelys sonder erkenning van subgenusse. Verskeie nuwe
kombinasies word gemaak.
The family name Asparagaceae was proposed by Jus-
sieu (1789), soon after the genus Asparagus was named
by Linnaeus (1753). The debate on the division of the
genus into separate genera or subgenera, was started by
Willdenow (1808) with his description of the genus Myr-
siphyllum, which was countered by Roemer & Schultes’s
(1829) treatment of Asparagus as a single genus. Kunth
( 1 850) then not only subdivided the genus, but transferred
it back to the Liliaceae. Baker ( 1875) continued the trend
and it remained the standard treatment till Huber (1969)
and Dahlgren & Clifford (1982) once again advanced the
concept of separate genera and the family name, Aspara-
gaceae.
Obermeyer (1983, 1984) adopted Kunth’s (1850) divi-
sion of Asparagus s.l. into three separate genera: Myrsi-
phyllum Willd., Asparagus L. with unisexual flowers and
Asparagopsis Kunth for the bisexual southern African spe-
cies, in preference to Baker’s (1875) single genus with
three subgenera, Euasparagus Baker (= Asparagus),
Asparagopsis (Kunth) Baker and Myrsiphyllum (Willd.)
Baker. As Asparagopsis had been used by Montagne
(1840) for a genus of the Rhodophycaceae and was there-
fore an illegitimate homonym in Kunth’s application,
Protasparagus Oberm. (1983) was published. This stance
was also taken in the treatment of the family for the Flora
of southern Africa by Obermeyer & Immelman (1992).
Malcomber & Sebsebe (1993) came to the conclusion
that, with only flower sexuality differing, Protasparagus
and Asparagus could not be separated at generic level nor
*Stellenbosch Herbarium. National Botanical Institute, RO. Box 471,
Stellenbosch 7599.
**National Herbarium. National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101,
Pretoria 0001.
MS. received: 1995-02-21.
even kept as separate subgenera, but rather, on the basis
of the shared character of free filaments, Protasparagus
and Asparagus belonged together in the subgenus Aspara-
gus. Neither could Myrsiphyllum be a distinct genus on
the strength of connivent filaments versus free ones in the
rest of the Asparagaceae. This character was, however,
sufficient to distinguish the taxon as a subgenus. They
therefore proposed that Asparagus be the only genus in
the Asparagaceae, with subgenera Myrsiphyllum and As-
paragus, the latter including the species previously placed
in Protasparagus.
We accept the treatment by Malcomber & Sebsebe
(1993) with reservation. The absence of A. juniperoides
Engl, and A. multituberosus R.A. Dyer from the list of
species investigated by these authors, prompted further in-
vestigation. As the close relatives of these two species are
in the subgenus with connivent filaments, it could be ex-
pected to find the same condition here. However, it could
not be demonstrated that filaments were markedly con-
nivent, and no significant differences were observed in
the degree to which filaments were connivent in the two
subgenera. Therefore, we prefer to refrain from dividing
the southern African species of the genus into subgenera.
In addition to the new combination made by Malcom-
ber & Sebsebe (1993), more new combinations as well
as reinstatements are necessary for the southern African
species of the genus Asparagus. The numbers next to the
species names listed alphabetically below (comb. nov.
numbers indented), are the species numbers allocated by
Obermeyer & Immelman (1992); those in Myrsiphyllum
being affixed with an ‘M’.
53. Asparagus acocksii Jessop in Bothalia 9: 74 ( 1966).
Protasparagus acocksii (Jessop) Oberm.: 243 (1983); Oberm. & Im-
melman: 57 (1992).
206
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
46. Asparagus aethiopicus L., Mantissa plantarum: 32
(1767).
Protasparagus aethiopicus (L.) Oberm.: 243 (1983); Oberm. & Im-
melman: 54 (1992).
19. Asparagus africanus Lam. , Encyclopedic methodique 1 :
295(1783).
Protasparagus africanus (Lam.) Oberm.: 243 (1983); Oberm. & Im-
melman: 35 (1992).
48. Asparagus aggregatus (Oberm.) Fellingham &
N.L. Mey. comb. nov.
Protasparagus aggregatus Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman: 55 (1992).
M8. Asparagus alopecurus (Oberm.) Malcomber &
Sebsebe in Kew Bulletin 48: 73 (1993).
Myrsiphyllum alopecurum Oberm.: 85 (1984); Oberm.: 78 (.1992).
50. Asparagus angusticladus (Jessop) Fellingham
& N.L. Mey. comb. nov.
Asparagus aethiopicus L. var. angusticladus Jessop: 69 (1966). Prot-
asparagus angusticladus (Jessop) Oberm.: 243 (1983); Oberm. & Im-
melman: 56 (1992).
M2. Asparagus asparagoides (L.) W. Wight , Century Dic-
tionary 2: 845 (1909).
Medeola asparagoides L.: 339 (1753). Myrsiphyllum asparagoides
(L.) Willd.: 25 (1808); Oberm.: 78 (1984); Oberm.: 73 (1992).
5 1 . Asparagus aspergillus Jessop in Bothalia 9:71 (1 966).
Protasparagus aspergillus (Jessop) Oberm.: 243 (1983); Oberm. &
Immelman: 56 (1992).
2. Asparagus bayeri (Oberm.) Fellingham & N.L.
Mey. comb. nov.
Protasparagus bayeri Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman: 21 (1992).
17. Asparagus bechuanicus Baker in W.T. Thiselton-
Dyer, Flora of tropical Africa 7: 429 ( 1 898).
Protasparagus bechuanicus (Baker) Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman:
33 (1992).
63. Asparagus biflorus (Oberm.) Fellingham &
N.L. Mey. comb. nov.
Protasparagus biflorus Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman: 63 (1992).
34. Asparagus buchananii Baker in Kew Bulletin 1893:
211 (1893).
Protasparagus buchananii (Baker) Oberm.: 243 (1983); Oberm. &
Immelman: 45 (1992).
8. Asparagus burchellii Baker in Journal of the Linnean
Society of London, Botany 14: 618 (1875).
Protasparagus burchellii (Baker) Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman:
27 (1992).
4a. Asparagus eapensis L. var. capensis. Species plantarum,
edn 1: 314(1753).
Protasparagus capensis (L.) Oberm.: 243 (1983); Oberm. & Immel-
man: 23 (1992).
4b. Asparagus capensis L. var. litoralis Suess. & J. Karl
in Mitteilungen der Botanischen Staatssammlung, Miinchen
1 : 50 ( 1 950); Jessop: 44 ( 1 966).
Protasparagus capensis L. var. litoralis (Suess. & J. Karl) Oberm.
comb, illeg. in Oberm. & Immelman: 24 (1992).
47. Asparagus clareae (Oberm.) Fellingham & N.L.
Mey. comb. nov.
Protasparagus clareae Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman: 54 (1992).
45. Asparagus coddii (Oberm.) Fellingham & N.L.
Mey. comb. nov.
Protasparagus coddii Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman: 53 (1992).
59. Asparagus concinnus (Baker) Kies in Bothalia 6: 1 78
(1951a).
Asparagus africanus Lam. var. concinnus Baker: 619 (1875). Pro-
tasparagus concinnus (Baker) Oberm. & Immelman: 61 (1992).
41. Asparagus confertus K. Krause in Botanische Jahr-
biicher 51 : 449 (1914).
Protasparagus confertus (K. Krause) Oberm. in Oberm. & Immel-
man: 51 (1992).
18. Asparagus cooperi Baker in Gardeners’ Chronicle 1 :
818 (1874a).
Protasparagus cooperi (Baker) Oberm.: 243 (1983); Oberm. & Im-
melman: 33 (1992).
52. Asparagus crassicladus./cs.so/? in Bothalia9: 75 ( 1966).
Protasparagus crassicladus (Jessop) Oberm.: 243 (1983); Oberm. &
Immelman: 57 (1992).
M9. Asparagus declinatus L.. Species plantarum, edn I :
313 (1753).
Myrsiphyllum declination (L.) Oberm.: 86 (1984); Oberm.: 78 (1992).
39. Asparagus densiflorus (Kuntli) Jessop in Bothalia 9:
65 (1966).
Asparagopsis densiflora Kunth: 96 ( 1850). Protasparagus densiflorus
(Kunth) Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman: 49 (1992).
2 1 . Asparagus denudatus ( Kunth ) Baker in Journal of the
Linnean Society of London, Botany 14: 606 (1875).
Asparagopsis denudatus Kunth: 82 (1850). Protasparagus denudatus
(Kunth) Oberm.: 243 (1983); Oberm. & Immelman: 36 (1992).
30. Asparagus devenishii (Oberm.) Fellingham &
N.L. Mey. comb. nov.
Protasparagus devenishii Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman: 41 (1992).
69. Asparagus divaricatus (Oberm.) Fellingham &
N.L. Mey. comb. nov.
Protasparagus divaricatus Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman: 67 (1992).
29. Asparagus edulis (Oberm.) Fellingham & N.L.
Mey. comb. nov.
Protasparagus edulis Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman: 41 (1992).
10. Asparagus exsertus (Oberm.) Fellingham & N.L.
Mey. comb. nov.
Protasparagus exsertus Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman: 29 (1992).
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
207
32. Asparagus exuvialis Burch., Travels in the interior of
southern Africa 1 : 432 ( 1 822).
Protasparagus exuvialis (Burch.) Oberm.: 244 (1983); Oberm. & Im-
melman: 42 (1992).
32a. Asparagus exuvialis Burch, forma ecklonii
(Baker) Fellingham & N.L. Mey. comb. nov.
Asparagus ecklonii Baker: 615 (1875). Protasparagus exuvialis
(Burch.) Oberm. forma ecklonii (Baker) Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman:
43 (1992).
33. Asparagus falcatus L., Species plantarum, edn 1:313
(1753).
Protasparagus falcatus (L.) Oberm.: 244 (1983); Oberm. & Immel-
man: 43 (1992).
M 1 2. Asparagus faseiculatus Thunb., Flora capensis. edn
2: 329 (1823).
Myrsiphyllum fasciculatum (Thunb.) Oberm.: 87 (1984); Oberm.: 80
(1992).
40. Asparagus filicladus (Oberm.) Fellingham &
N.L. Mey. comb. nov.
Protasparagus filicladus Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman: 51 (1992).
1 la. Asparagus flavicaulis (Oberm.) Fellingham &
N.L Mey. comb. nov.
Protasparagus flavicaulis Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman: 29
(1992).
1 lb. Asparagus flavicaulis (Oberm.) Fellingham &
N.L Mey. subsp. setulosus (Oberm.) Fellingham & N.L.
Mey. comb. nov.
Protasparagus flavicaulis Oberm. subsp. setulosus Oberm. in Oberm.
& Immelman: 30 (1992).
61. Asparagus fouriei (Oberm.) Fellingham & N.L.
Mey. comb. nov.
Protasparagus fouriei Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman: 62 (1992).
28. Asparagus fractiflexus (Oberm.) Fellingham &
N.L. Mey. comb. nov.
Protasparagus fractiflexus Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman: 40 (1992).
3. Asparagus glaucus Kies in Bothalia 6: 229 (1951b).
Protasparagus glaucus (Kies) Oberm.: 224 (1983); Oberm. & Im-
melman: 23 (1992).
31. Asparagus graniticus (Oberm.) Fellingham &
N.L. Mey. comb. nov.
Protasparagus graniticus Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman: 42 (1992).
68. Asparagus intricatus (Oberm.) Fellingham &
N.L. Mey. comb. nov.
Protasparagus intricatus Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman: 65 (1992).
M7. Asparagus juniperoides Engl, in Botanische Jahr-
biicher 10:3(1889).
Myrsiphyllum juniperoides (Engl.) Oberm.: 84 (1984); Oberm.: 78
(1992).
M4. Asparagus kraussianus (Kunth) J.F. Macbr. in Con-
tributions from the Gray Herbarium 56: 17 (1918).
Myrsiphyllum kraussianum Kunth: 107 (1850); Oberm.: 80 (1984);
Oberm.: 76 (1992).
42. Asparagus krebsianus (Kunth) Jessop in Bothalia 9:
74(1966).
Asparagopsis krebsiana Kunth: 93 (1850). Protasparagus krebsianus
(Kunth) Oberm.: 244 (1983); Oberm. & Immelman: 51 (1992).
1 6. Asparagus laricinus Burch., Travels in the interior of
southern Africa 1: 537 (1822).
Protasparagus laricinus (Burch.) Oberm.: 244 (1983); Oberm. & Im-
melman: 33 (1992).
23. Asparagus lignosus Burm.f, Prodromus florae cap-
ensis: 10 (1768).
Protasparagus lignosus (Burm.f.) Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman:
37 (1992).
20. Asparagus longicladus N.E. Br. in Kew Bulletin
1921: 298 (1921).
Protasparagus longicladus (N.E. Br.) B. Mathew: 181 (1989);
Oberm. & Immelman: 36 (1992).
36. Asparagus lvnetteae (Oberm.) Fellingham &
N.L. Mey. comb. nov.
Protasparagus lynetteae Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman: 47 (1992).
60. Asparagus maeowanii Baker in Journal of the Lin-
nean Society of London, Botany 14: 609 (1875).
Protasparagus maeowanii (Baker) Oberm.: 244 (1983); Oberm. &
Immelman: 62 (1992).
6. Asparagus mariae (Oberm.) Fellingham & N.L.
Mey. comb. nov.
Protasparagus mariae Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman: 24 (1992).
57. Asparagus microraphis (Kunth) Baker in Journal of
the Linnean Society of London. Botany 14: 612 (1875).
Asparagopsis microraphis Kunth: 83 (1850). Protasparagus mi-
croraphis (Kunth) Oberm.: 244 (1983): Oberm. & Immelman: 59 (1992).
64. Asparagus minutiflorus (Kunth) Baker in Journal of
the Linnean Society of London. Botany 14: 616 (1875).
Asparagopsis minutiflorus Kunth: 89 (1850). Protasparagus minuti-
florus (Kunth) Oberm.: 244 (1983); Oberm. & Immelman: 64 (1992).
15. Asparagus mollis (Oberm.) Fellingham & N.L.
Mey. comb. nov.
Protasparagus mollis Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman: 32 (1992).
25. Asparagus mucronatusicsso/? in Bothalia 9: 56 ( 1 966).
Protasparagus mucronatus (Jessop) Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman:
38 (1992).
27. Asparagus multiflorus Baker in Journal of the Lin-
nean Society of London, Botany 14: 610 (1875).
Protasparagus multiflorus (Baker) Oberm.: 244 (1983); Oberm. &
Immelman: 39 (1992).
M 1 . Asparagus multituberosus R.A. Dyer in Bothalia 6: 442
(1954).
Myrsiphyllum multituberosum (R.A. Dyer) Oberm.: 77 (1984);
Oberm.: 73 (1992).
208
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
49. Asparagus natalensis (Baker) Fellingham & N.L.
Mey. comb. nov.
Asparagus aethiopicus L. var. natalensis Baker: 272 ( 1 896). Prot-
asparagus natalensis (Baker) Oberm.: 244 (1983); Oberni. & Immelman:
56 (1992).
37. Asparagus nelsii Schinz in Bulletin de 1’Herbier Boissier,
Ser. 1,4, App. 3: 44 (1896).
Protasparagus nelsii (Schinz) Oberm.: 244 (1983); Oberm. & Im-
melman: 48 (1992).
56. Asparagus nodulosus (Oberm.) Fellingham & N.L.
Mey. comb. nov.
Protasparagus nodulosus Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman: 59 (1992).
12. Asparagus oliveri (Oberm.) Fellingham & N.L.
Mey. comb. nov.
Protasparagus oliveri Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman: 30 (1992).
M3. Asparagus ovatus T.M. Salter in Journal of South
African Botany 6: 167 (1940).
Myrsiphyllum ovatum (T.M. Salter) Oberm.: 79 (1984); Oberm.: 75
(1992).
38. Asparagus oxyacanthus Baker in Journal of the Lin-
nean Society of London, Botany 14: 625 (1875).
Protasparagus oxyacanthus (Baker) Oberm.: 244 (1983); Oberm. &
Immelman: 48 (1992).
22. Asparagus pearsonii Kies in Bothalia 6: 1 79 ( 1 95 1 a).
Protasparagus pearsonii (Kies) Oberm.: 244 (1983); Oberm. & Im-
melman: 37 (1992).
14. Asparagus pendulus (Oberm.) Fellingham &
N.L. Mey. comb.nov.
Protasparagus pendulus Oberm. in Obeim. & Immelman: 32 (1992).
55. Asparagus plumosus Baker in Journal of the Linnean
Society of London, Botany 14: 613 (1875).
Protasparagus plumosus (Baker) Oberm.: 244 (1983); Oberm. & Im-
melman: 59 (1992).
35. Asparagus racemosus Willd.. Species plantarum edn
4,2:152(1799).
Protasparagus racemosus (Willd.) Oberm.: 244 (1983); Oberm. &
Immelman: 45 (1992).
MIL Asparagus ramosissimus Baker in Gardeners’
Chronicle new series 2: 6 ( 1 874b).
Myrsiphyllum ramosissimum (Baker) Oberm.: 87 (1984); Oberm.: 79
(1992).
1. Asparagus recurvispinus (Oberm.) Fellingham
& N.L. Mey. comb. nov.
Protasparagus recurvispinus Obeim. in Oberm. & Immelman: 19 (1992).
26. Asparagus retrofractus L.. Species plantarum, edn 1:313
(1753).
Protasparagus retrofractus (L.) Oberm.: 244 (1983); Oberm. & Im-
melman: 39 (1992).
65. Asparagus rigidus Jessop in Bothalia 9: 64 ( 1966).
Protasparagus rigidus (Jessop) Oberm.: 244 (1983); Oberm. & Im-
melman: 64 (1992).
24. Asparagus rubicundus P.J. Bergius , Descriptiones
plantarum ex Capite Bonae Spei: 88 (1767).
Protasparagus rubicundus (P.J. Bergius) Oberm.: 244 (1983); Oberm.
& Immelman: 38 (1992).
M 1 0. Asparagus scandens Thunb ., Prodromus plantarum
capensium 1 : 66 (1794).
Myrsiphyllum scandens (Thunb.) Oberm.: 86 (1984); Oberm.: 79
(1992).
44. Asparagus sehroederi Engl, in Botanische Jahr-
biicher 32: 97 (1903).
Protasparagus sehroederi (Engl.) Oberm.: 244 (1983); Oberm. & Im-
melman: 53 (1992).
62. Asparagus sekukuniensis (Oberm.) Felling-
ham & N.L. Mey. comb. nov.
Protasparagus sekukuniensis Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman: 63
(1992).
54. Asparagus setaceus (Kunth) Jessop in Bothalia 9: 5 1
(1966).
Asparagopsis setacea Kunth: 82 (1850). Protasparagus setaceus
(Kunth) Oberm.: 244 (1983); Oberm. & Immelman: 58 (1992).
9. Asparagus spinescens Steud. ex Roem. & Schult.,
Systema vegetabilium 7, 1 : 334 ( 1 829).
Protasparagus spinescens (Steud. ex Roem. & Schult.) Oberm. in
Oberm. & Immelman: 27 (1992).
58. Asparagus stellatus Baker in Journal of the Linnean
Society of London, Botany 14: 612 (1875).
Protasparagus stellatus (Baker) Obeim. in Oberm. & Immelman: 61
(1992).
5. Asparagus stipulaceus Lam.. Encyclopedic methodique
1:297 (1783).
Protasparagus stipulaceus (Lam.) Obeim.: 244 (1983); Oberm. &
Immelman: 24 (1992).
66. Asparagus striatus (L.f.) Thunb.. Prodromus plan-
tarum capensium 1: 65 (1794).
Dracaena striata L.f.: 204 (1781). Protasparagus striatus (L.f.)
Oberm.: 244 (1983); Oberm. & Immelman: 64 (1992).
7. Asparagus suaveolens Burch.. Travels in the interior
of southern Africa 2: 226 ( 1 824).
Protasparagus suaveolens (Burch.) Oberm.: 244 (1983); Oberm. &
Immelman: 25 (1992).
67. Asparagus subulatus Thunb.. Prodromus plantarum
capensium 1:66(1794).
Protasparagus subulatus (Thunb.) Oberm.: 244 (1983); Oberm. &
Immelman: 65 (1992).
43. Asparagus transvaalensis (Oberm.) Fellingham
& N.L. Mey. comb. nov.
Protasparagus transvaalensis Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman: 52 ( 1992).
M6. Asparagus undulatus (L.f. ) Thunb., Prodromus plan-
tarum capensium 1 : 66 ( 1 794).
Dracaena undulata L.f.: 203 (1781). Myrsiphyllum undulatum (L.f.)
Kunth: 109 (1850); Oberm.: 83 (1984); Oberm.: 77 (1992).
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
209
13. Asparagus virgatus Baker in Refugium botanicum 3:
t. 214(1870).
Protasparagus virgatus (Baker) Oberm. in Oberm. & Immelman: 31
(1992).
M5. Asparagus volubilis Thunb., Prodromus plantarum
capensium 1 : 66 (1794).
Myrsiphyllum volubile (Thunb.) Oberm.: 82 (1984); Oberm.: 76
(1992).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We gratefully acknowledge the help and guidance re-
ceived from Mr E.G.H. Oliver in the preparation of this
article.
REFERENCES
BAKER, J.G. 1870. Asparagus virgatus. In W.W. Saunders, Refugium
botanicum 3: t. 214. Van Voorst, London.
BAKER, J.G. 1 874a. New garden plants: Asparagus (Asparagopsis) coo-
peri Baker. Gardeners' Chronicle 1: 818.
BAKER, J.G. 1874b. Gardeners' Chronicle new series 2: 6.
BAKER, J.G. 1875. Revision of the genera and species of Asparagaceae.
Journal of the Linnean Society of London. Botany 14: 594—631.
BAKER, J.G. 1893. Decades kewenses — Decas VI. Kew Bulletin 1893:
209-212.
BAKER, J.G. 1896. Asparagus. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora capensis
6: 256-274. Reeve, London.
BAKER, J.G. 1898. Asparagus. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora of tropical
Africa 7: 425^436. Reeve, London.
BERGIUS, RJ. 1767. Descriptiones plantarum ex Capite Bonae Spei.
Salvius, Stockholm.
BROWN, N.E. 1921. New plants from tropical and South Africa col-
lected by Archdeacon F.A. Rogers. Kew Bulletin 1921: 289-301.
BURCHELL, W.J. 1822. Travels in the interior of southern Africa 1.
Longman, London.
BURCHELL, W.J. 1824. Travels in the interior of southern Africa 2.
Longman, London.
BURMAN, N.L. 1768. Prodromus florae capensis in Flora indica. Haak,
Leiden.
DAHLGREN, R.M.T. & CLIFFORD, H.T. 1982. The Monocotyledons: a
comparative study. Academic Press, London.
DYER. R.A. 1954. Liliaceae. Bothalia 6: 440-445.
ENGLER. A. 1889. Plantae Marlothianae. Liliaceae. Botanische
Jahrbiicher 10: 2, 3.
ENGLER, H.G.A. 1903. Liliaceae africanae II. Botanische Jahrbiicher
32: 89-97.
HUBER. H. 1969. Die Samenmerkmale und Verwandtschaftsverhaltnisse
der Liliifloren. Mitteilungen der Botanischen Staatssammlung,
Miinchen 8: 219-538.
JESSOP, J. 1966. The genus Asparagus in southern Africa. Bothalia 9:
31-96.
JUSSIEU, A.L. DE 1789. Genera plantarum. Paris.
KIES, P. 1951a. Notes on Asparagus africanus and related species.
Bothalia 6: 177-181.
KIES, P. 1951b. Newly described species. Bothalia 6: 213-238.
KRAUSE, K. 1914. Liliaceae africanae V. Botanische Jahrbiicher 51:
440-450.
KUNTH, C.S. 1850. Enumeratio plantarum 5. Cotta, Stuttgart & Tubin-
gen.
LAMARCK, J.B.A.P.M. DE 1783. Encyclopedic methodique 1. Mme
veuve Agasse, Paris.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum. edn 1. Salvii, Stockholm.
LINNAEUS, C. 1767. Mantissa plantarum. Salvii, Stockholm.
LINNAEUS, C. VON (fil.) 1781. Supplementum plantarum. Impensis
Orphanotrophei, Brunswick.
MACBRIDE, J.F. 1918. Further new or otherwise interesting Liliaceae.
Contributions from the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University
56: 17.
MALCOMBER, S.T. & SEBSEBE. D. 1993. The status of Protasparagus
and Myrsiphyllum in the Asparagaceae. Kew Bulletin 48: 63-78.
MATHEW, B. 1989. Notes on tropical African Asparagaceae. Kew Bulle-
tin 44: 181, 182.
MONTAGNE, J.P.F.C. 1 840. Asparagopsis. In P.B. Webb & S. Berthelot,
Histoire Naturelle des lies Canaries 3,2: 15. Bethune, Paris.
OBERMEYER, A. A. 1983. Protasparagus Oberm. nom. nov.: new com-
binations. South African Journal of Botany 2: 243, 244.
OBERMEYER, A. A. 1984. Revision of the genus Myrsiphyllum Willd.
Bothalia 15: 77-88.
OBERMEYER, A. A. 1992. Myrsiphyllum. In O.A. Leistner, Flora of
southern Africa 5,3: 71-82.
OBERMEYER. A. A. & IMMELMAN, K.L. 1992. Protasparagus. In
O.A. Leistner, Flora of southern Africa 5,3: 1 1-70.
ROEMER. J.J. & SCHULTES, J.A. 1829. Caroli a Linne equitis Systema
vegetabilium 7,1. Cotta, Stuttgart.
SALTER, T.M. 1940. Plantae novae Africanae XV. Journal of South
African Botany 6: 165-175.
SCHINZ, H. 1896. Die Pflanzenwelt Deutsch-Sudwestafrikas. Bulletin
de I'Herbier Boissier Set. 1,4, App. 3: 1-57.
SUESSENGUTH, K. & KARL, J. 1950. Diagnoses novae plantarum in
Africa australi a Dr S. Rehm et aliis collectarum. Mitteilungen der
Botanischen Staatssammlung, Miinchen 1: 50.
THUNBERG, C.P. 1794. Prodromus plantarum capensium 1. Edman.
Uppsala.
THLdNBERG, C.P. 1823. Flora capensis , ed. Schultes. Edman, Uppsala.
WIGHT, W.F. 1909. Century Dictionary 2: 845.
WILLDENOW, C.L. 1799. Caroli a Linne Species plantarum editio
quarta 2. Berlin.
WILLDENOW, C.L. 1808. Nahere Bestimmung einiger Liliengewachse,
besonders aber derjenigen, die zur sechsten Klasse und dritten
Ordnung des Linneschen Systems gehoren. Gesellschaft naturfor-
schender Freunde zu Berlin Magazin 2: 25, 26.
Bothalia 25,2: 211-231 (1995)
The taxonomic history of the Ricciaceae (1937-1995) and a classification of
sub-Saharan Ricciae
S.M. PEROLD*
Keywords: classification, groups, history, Ricciaceae, sections, species, subgenera, sub-Saharan Africa
ABSTRACT
The taxonomic history of the Ricciaceae (1937-1995) is reviewed. Over the years many attempts have been made to
subdivide and rearrange the taxa in this large and puzzling family, but consensus has still not been reached. Hepaticologists are
therefore urged to undertake more revisions worldwide, using modem methods of investigation to aid them in. hopefully,
coming to an eventual agreement in defining the limits of subgenera, sections, species and subspecies in the Ricciae. In addition,
a classification of sub-Saharan Ricciaceae. partially based on informal groups, is herein proposed.
UITTREKSEL
"n Oorsig van die taksonomiese geskiedenis van die Ricciaceae (1937-1 995 ) word gegee. Oor die jare heen is talle pogings
aangewend om die taksons in hierdie groot en moeilike familie op te deel en te herrangskik, maar eenstemmigheid is nog nie
bereik nie. Hepatikoloe word aldus aangemoedig om verdere hersienings wereldwyd te ondemeem en om modeme ondersoek-
metodes aan te wend, wat hopelik sal help om uiteindelik eenstemmigheid te bereik oor die omskrywing van subgenusse,
seksies, spesies en subspesies in die Ricciae. Verder word 'n klassifikasie van die Ricciaceae van Afrika, suid van die Sahara,
wat gedeeltelik op informele groepe gebaseer is, hier voorgestel.
CONTENTS
Introduction 211
Overview of regional studies 212
1. Duthie & Garside ( 1937, 1939): South Africa. 212
2. Frye & Clark ( 1937-1947): North America .. 212
3. Schuster (1949): central and western New York. 213
4. Schuster (1953): Minnesota and adjacent regions 2 1 3
5. Meijer (1951): The Netherlands 213
6. Muller (1951-1958): Europe 214
7. Amell (1956): Scandinavia 214
8. Jones (1957): tropical Africa 215
9. Pande & Udar ( 1958): India 215
10. Hassel de Menendez (1963): Argentina 215
11. Amell (1963): southern Africa 216
1 2. Vanden Berghen (1972): Zaire. Zambia 217
13. Jovet-Ast ( 1975): diverse areas 217
14. Campbell ( 1 975, 1 977): New Zealand 217
15. Grolle (1976, 1983): Europe and adjacent regions 2 1 7
16. Na-Thalang ( 1980): Australia 217
17. Jovet-Ast (1984): Australia 219
18. Volk (1983): Namibia and southern Africa
(and elsewhere) 219
19. Schuster ( 1984, 1985): diverse areas 219
20. Perold (1986): southern Africa 219
21. Schuster (1985): worldwide 219
22. Scott (1985): southern Australia 220
23. Volk & Perold (1986a): South Africa 220
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria.
MS received: 1995-04-28.
24. Jovet-Ast ( 1986): Mediterranean countries . . . 220
25. Damsholt & Hallingback (1986): Fennoscandia . 22 1
26. Volk & Perold (1990): South Africa 221
27. Smith (1990): Britain and Ireland 221
28. Van Melick (1991): The Netherlands 222
29. Volk & Perold; Perold & Volk; Perold ( 1984-
1991 ): southern Africa 222
30. Jovet-Ast (1991, 1993): Latin America 223
31. Schuster (1992): North America (and elsewhere) 224
Discussion 226
32. Perold ( 1995): sub-Saharan Africa 227
Acknowledgements 228
References 228
Index to taxa 229
INTRODUCTION
Upon recently re-reading Duthie & Garside’s (1937)
excellent account of the taxonomic history of the Ric-
ciaceae, which begins with John Ray (1696) and spans
the next ± 240 years, I was once more struck by the many
attempts to subdivide and rearrange the taxa in this large
and puzzling family during that time.
This publication aims to cover in chronological order
the most important regional studies of the Ricciaceae, that
span the period between the survey by Duthie & Garside
and the present.
It has now become accepted practice to recognize only
two genera in the family, the monotypic Ricciocarpos and
the species-rich Riccia. Both genera are characterized by
the simplicity of the sporophytes, which are immersed in
the thallus, and by the lack of elaters. The assimilation
212
Bothalia 25,2 ( 1995)
tissue in Ricciocarpos (formerly section Hemiseuma) con-
tains tiered air chambers, whereas in Riccia it has either
narrow air canals or rather wide, uniseriate air chambers.
Other major differences between Ricciocarpos and Riccia
are the following: Ricciocarpos is terrestrial or aquatic; in
the latter the ventral scales are much elongated and pen-
dant, with the margins serrate; single oil bodies are scat-
tered throughout the cells of the scales and thallus; the
antheridia and archegonia are in groups confined to the
median groove of the thallus. Except for the Riccia flui-
tans complex, which is often aquatic and has small ventral
scales that are never pendant, Riccia species are terrestrial
and the scales are sometimes evanescent, but mostly reach
to the thallus margins or extend above them; oil bodies
are absent and the gametangia are not strictly confined to
the median groove of the thallus.
Although there are intermediate forms with regard to
the width of the air spaces in Riccia , the two groups clas-
sified here are generally recognized respectively as sub-
genus (rarely as section) Riccia (formerly Lichenoides or
Euriccia ) and as subgenus Ricciella (formerly, occasion-
ally, as genus or as section). In the latter, two formal sub-
divisions have been recognized for a long time by the
position of the capsule in the thallus and by the direction
of liberation of the spores, i.e. the spores can be liberated
dorsally (section Spongodes Nees) or ventrally (section
Ricciella (A. Br.) Rchb.). Only informal subdivisions of
subgenus Riccia have, however, been recognized until re-
cently. as it was thought that not enough was known about
several aspects of many species in this subgenus, that oc-
curs worldwide, to make formal subdivisions.
OVERVIEW OF REGIONAL STUDIES
In the following overview diagnostic features are not
cited verbatim from each author’s text, but information is
extracted from the description and keys and then com-
bined in an abbreviated form more or less retaining the
author’s choice of words.
1 . DUTHIE & GARSIDE (1937, 1939): South Africa
In 1937 Duthie & Garside published their detailed his-
tory of the group. Although they were aware of at least
1 1 species in the genus Riccia from the Stellenbosch Flats
alone, they dealt with only five species in the section,
then referred to as Ricciella.
1.1 Genus Riccia: upper photosynthetic zone in majority
of species consisting of pillar-like vertical rows of cells
separated by narrow air spaces, terminal cells of vertical
rows usually larger and devoid of chlorophyll.
1.1. 1 Section ‘ Ricciella upper zone consisting of air
chambers, apparently strictly uniseriate and separated by
plates of chlorophyll-containing cells; chambers roofed
over by epidermis perforated by simple air pores which
enlarge and later on cause the dorsal surface to become
pitted; spores liberated from dorsal surface of thallus, but
deeply imbedded and clearly visible from below; com-
mon, annual species.
R. plana Taylor (synonym of R. crystallina L.); R. rau-
tanenii Steph. (synonym of R. cavernosa Hoffm. emend.
Raddi). Spores separate at maturity; monoicous.
R. cupulifera A.V. Duthie. Spores separate at maturity;
dioicous; heterothallic.
R. curtisii (James ex Austin) Austin (corrected author
citation); R. compacta Garside (air chamber layer rather
more compact and firmer). Spores retained in permanent
tetrads; dioicous; heterothallic.
Nowadays species that retain their spores in permanent
tetrads are assigned to subgenus Thallocarpus (Lindb.) Ast
(1975).
Duthie & Garside suggest that the Ricciaceae may be a
polyphyletic group, derived along several lines of descent.
Their work together was discontinued when Duthie retired
in 1939.
2. FRYE & CLARK (1937-1947): North America
Frye & Clark recognized three genera in the Ricciaceae,
namely Riccia, Ricciocarpns forth, var.) and Oxymitra.
2.1 Genus Riccia : thalli growing on damp or wet soil or
suspended in water but not floating; air spaces narrow or
chambered; antheridia and archegonia scattered; sporo-
phyte without involucre; air pores inconspicuous, not stel-
late, the walls radiating from them not greatly thickened;
divided into sections Euriccia and Ricciella.
2.1.1 Section Euriccia: air chambers are spaces between
vertical or subvertical columns of photosynthetic cells;
species assigned here are grouped together by absence or
presence of cilia and by size of scales.
R. dictyospora Howe, R. macallisteri Howe, R. bijurca
Hoffm.; R. glauca L., R. sorocarpa Bisch., R. campbel-
liana Howe, R. nigrella DC., R. albida Sulk, R. austinii
Steph. Margins of thallus without cilia; scales conspicuous
or inconspicuous.
R. californica Austin, R. hirta (Austin) Underw., R.
beyrichiana Hampe ex Lehm., R. tnchocarpa Howe, R.
donnellii Austin. Margins of thallus with cilia.
2.1.2 Section Ricciella: air chambers polyhedral hollows
bounded by unistratose walls; margins of thallus lack cilia;
ventral scales lacking or rudimentary.
R. membranacea Gottsche & Lindenb., R. frostii
Austin, R. crystallina L. (misidentified and is R. caver-
nosa), R. sullivantii Austin. Mature spores not grouped in
tetrads.
R. curtisii. Mature spores remaining attached in tetrads.
R. fluitans L. Thalli free-floating or stranded; segments
narrowly linear.
In all modern treatments, two of the species they in-
cluded in section Ricciella , R. curtisii and R. membrana-
cea, are assigned to different subgenera, namely Thallo-
carpus (as mentioned before) and Leptoriccia (Schuster
1984) respectively.
2.2 Genus Ricciocarpns Corda: R. natans (L.) Corda.
Thalli floating to stranded or rarely growing on very wet
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
213
soil; antheridia and archegonia located in median groove;
dorsal surface distinctly reticulate on account of air cham-
bers visible through it; monotypic.
2.3 Genus Oxymitra Bisch.: O. androgyna Howe. Thalli
growing on soil, air chambers large, subvertical, prismatic
or pyramidal; sporophyte with conspicuous conic or tri-
angular-pyramidal involucre; pores stellate due to greatly
thickened walls radiating from them.
Muller (1940) segregated the family Oxymitraceae
from the family Ricciaceae, to accommodate the genus
Oxymitra in the suborder Ricciineae. Although its sporo-
phytes are similar to those of the Ricciaceae, its thalli and
chromosome number are different, for which reasons it is
best treated in a separate family. Garside (1958), however,
described a new species of Oxymitra, O. cristata, from
South Africa, but referred it to the family Ricciaceae and
not to Muller’s (1940) family Oxymitraceae, although he
mentioned Muller’s publication. This was presumably
done because Garside was unsure whether the name
Oxymitra would be upheld.
3. SCHUSTER ( 1949): central and western New York
In an early study on the Hepaticae of this region,
Schuster treated Ricciocarpus and Riccia (with 6 local
species) in the Ricciaceae.
3.1 Genus Ricciocarpus Corda: R. natans. Aquatic; occur-
ring in circumneutral or somewhat calcareous waters,
shallow and still or occasionally stranded on shore: thallus
broad; ventral scales purple, dense, stiff, sword-like.
3.2 Genus Riccia : no subgenera or sections are mentioned,
but the key distinguishes between the following two
groups:
3.2a Group 1. R. fluitans (a mostly aquatic species), R.
crystallina , R. sullivantii (the latter bracketed, because it
only presumably occurs in the above area), R. frostii.
‘Photosynthetic tissue loose, separated by more or less
widely polyhedral air chambers, walls between chambers
only one cell thick; ventral scales absent or obsolete.'
3.2b Group 2. R. sorocarpa , R. arvensis Austin (a synonym
of R. bifurca Hoffm.). ‘Photosynthetic tissue compact, with
narrow vertical or subvertical, canal-like air chambers (at
times becoming polyhedral near margins); spores areolate to
alveolate, over 65 pm in longer diameter.’
4. SCHUSTER (1953): Minnesota and adjacent regions
Subsequently in reporting on the family Ricciaceae
(Suborder Ricciineae) from Minnesota and adjacent re-
gions, Schuster (1953) followed the conventional treat-
ment of placing in it the genera Ricciocarpus and Riccia.
In the latter he now recognized two subgenera. Ricciella
and Euriccia (with two sections).
4. 1 Genus Ricciocarpus: R. natans. Aquatic or subaquatic,
floating on water surface or stranded; in imperfect, partial
rosettes, with long, linear ventral scales; thallus with nar-
row, sharp, median groove, air pores and scattered oil cells.
4.2 Genus Riccia : thallose forms with sporophyte reduced
and surrounded by thallus tissue; air pores vestigial and
very inconspicuous, surrounded by hardly modified cells;
terrestrial forms in rosettes, but some species normally
aquatic; very variable.
4.2.1 Subgenus Ricciella : internal photosynthetic tissue
loose, forming large, polyhedral chambers (i.e. not com-
pact in structure in cross section); ventral scales rudimen-
tary; marginal cilia of thallus lacking; dorsal surface of
terrestrial forms often lacunose and spongiose with age.
R. fluitans (with related European taxa, R. rhenana Lorb.,
R. duplex Lorb. and R. canaliculata Hoffm. not yet found in
North America). Thallus segments narrowly linear, less than
0.7 mm wide; free-floating under water; sterile.
R. frostii. R. crystallina (misidentified and is R. caver-
nosa), R. sullivantii (the latter with sporangia bulging and
rupturing ventrally). Thallus segments relatively broad, al-
ways terrestrial; spores various.
4.2.2 Subgenus Euriccia: photosynthetic tissue compact;
spores always regularly areolate on external faces, with
or without wing margin.
R. austini (sic ),R. dictyospora, R. macallisteri, R. soro-
carpa, R. ar\>ensis. Thallus margins acute, sharp or rarely
obtuse, without obvious cilia; scales large, hyaline or pur-
ple, protruding beyond thallus margins or not.
R. hirta, R. beyrichicma, R. trichocarpa. Thallus mar-
gins obtuse, never sharp, with distinct cilia.
4.2.2. 1 Section Hirtae: R. hirta, R. beyrichiana, R. arven-
sis, and R. eldeeniae Jacobs (a synonym of R. warnstorfii
Limpr. ex Wamst.). Defined as ‘extreme xeric forms
which may show cilia and development of purplish pig-
mentation of lateral thallus margins under extreme inso-
lation'.
4. 2. 2. 2 Section Papillosae: R. atromarginata Levier. De-
fined as ‘extreme xeric forms abundantly hirsute'. No
mention is made of the author(s) of the two sections, nor
are there Latin descriptions or references that I could trace,
so I must infer that possibly, Schuster himself was the
author of these two sections which were, of course, then
not validly published.
5. MEIJER (1951): The Netherlands
5.1 Genus Riccia is defined by Meijer as including land
and water form species, frequently with ventral scales; the
compact rosette-shaped thalli are less strongly forked in
the land forms than in the water forms, which have thin,
narrow lobes that branch regularly and frequently; chlo-
rophyll-containing cells have smaller or larger air spaces
between; in isolated species reduced air pores are present;
two subgenera are recognized.
5.1.1 Subgenus Euriccia : chlorophyll-containing top portion
of thallus with narrow air canals bounded by 4 cell pillars:
R. glauca. TTiallus 4—5 times wider than thick in trans-
verse section.
R. subbifurca Wamst. ex Crozals (with large scales),
R. bifurca, R. beyrichiana (the latter two species with
small scales), R. sorocarpa (distinguished by the secon-
214
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
dary epidermis having thickened walls). Thallus l-3‘/2
times wider than thick in tranverse section; thallus margins
with few or no cilia.
5.1.2 Subgenus Ricciella : top portion of thallus contains
large superimposed air chambers separated on all sides by
unicellular walls; (they are said to have the ability to adopt
an amphibian life style).
R. canaliculata (land form). Thallus ± twice wider than
thick, not or seldom branching.
R. crystallina, R. huebeneriana Lindenb. Thallus in a
rosette, spongy in older parts or with pitted appearance
dorsally.
R. rhenana, R. fluitans. Thallus not in a rosette, dor-
sally not pitted.
Meijer remarked on the problems encountered in
studying dried Riccia material and the desirability of ex-
amining living examples.
6. MULLER (1951-1958): Europe
Muller also recognized two genera, Ricciocarpus and
Riccia in the family Ricciaceae.
6. 1 Genus Ricciocarpus : R. natans. Thalli floating on water;
with long, band-shaped ventral scales hanging down; can
also manifest as a land form, when ventral scales are small;
assimilation tissue with large, tiered air chambers, air pores
present; oil bodies scattered in thallus and ventral scales;
gametangia sunken along centre of thallus.
6.2 Genus Riccia'. land forms or submerged in water; ventral
scales small, rarely projecting above thallus margins; assimi-
lation tissue in parallel cell rows or chambered; air pores
sometimes present in subgenus Ricciella ; oil cells lacking
and gametangia scattered over whole surface of thallus.
6.2.1 Subgenus Ricciella'. assimilation tissue consists of
chambers; simple air pores are now and then present in
roof over chambers.
R. frostii, R. crystallina , R. crystallina var. angustior
Nees (= R. cavernosa ), R. huebeneriana. Thalli in small
or large rosettes; spores various.
R. fluitans, R. canaliculata, R. rhenana, R. duplex.
Thalli linear, rarely forked; dorsally often clearly marked
into areas; some mostly aquatic.
Muller attempted (rather like Stephani (1898) and oth-
ers before him) to arrange the large number of species in
the subgenus Euriccia into informal groups, the members
of which are related by one or more shared characters,
e.g. the presence of cilia along the thallus margins or by
papillae on the dorsal surface or by thickened walls in the
(sub)dorsal cells.
6.2.2 Subgenus Euriccia'. assimilation tissue consists of
cell rows, ending in a larger cell on top.
6.2.2a Group Ciliifera
R. ciliifera Link, R. gougetiana Mont., R. gougetiana
var. erinacea Schiffn., R. zachariae Lorb., R. sommieri
Levier, R. melitensis C. Massal., R. macrocarpa Levier.
Some thalli with single cilia, but not a very constant char-
acter.
6.2.2b Group Ciliata
R. ciliata Hoffm., var. epilosa Wamst. var. intumescens
Bisch., var. violacea Kny, R. canescens Steph., R. crozalsii
Levier, R. michelii Raddi, R. bicarinata Lindb. Thallus
margins mostly with numerous long cilia.
6.2.2c Group Bifurca
R. bifurca , R. beyrichiana. Terminal branches with
margins raised and swollen; median groove wide and shal-
low.
6.2. 2d Group Sorocarpa
R. ligula Steph., R. wamstorfii, R. sorocarpa (subdorsal
cells with thickened walls), var. heegii Schiffn., R. breidleri
Jur., R. oelandica C.E.O. Jensen. Small plants, mostly linear
or lingulate, rarely with a few cilia.
6.2.2e Group Papillosa
R. papillosa Moris. Dorsal surface and along margins
with large papillae.
6.2. 2f Group Nigrella
R. subbifurca , R. nigrella, R. atromarginata var. glabra
Levier, R. trabutiana Steph. Thalli mostly in small ro-
settes; sometimes with deep median groove; occasionally
with blunt papillae dorsally.
6.2. 2g Group Lamellosa
R. lamellosa Raddi. Ventral scales large, hyaline and
extending above thallus margins.
6.2. 2h Group Glauca
R. glauca var. subinermis (Lindb.) Wamst. Thalli thin;
at margins occasionally with short hairs; in rosettes; scales
colourless.
7. ARNELL (1956): Scandinavia
In his treatment of the 'Hepaticae of the Moss Flora
of Fennoscandia’, Arnell placed the family Ricciaceae in
the suborder Ricciineae H. Buch and also recognized two
genera, Ricciocarpus and Riccia.
7. 1 Genus Ricciocarpus'. R. natans. Floating form with long
ventral scales hanging down, land fonn with smaller scales;
cordate; leathery; greyish green to dark green; dorsally with
pores surrounded by 5 or 6 thin-walled guard cells; assimi-
lative tissue containing several large air chambers, one lying
above the other; ventral tissue thin; oil cells present;
antheridia in small groups sunken in the middle.
7.2 Genus Riccia'. dorsal surface of thallus not leathery; yel-
lowish to dark green; assimilative tissue consisting of vertical
cell rows with interposed vertical, air-filled canals, or con-
sisting of the walls of the air chambers, the upper of which
each has a little pore in the middle of its roof; antheridia
scattered or in groups, not crowded in special organs.
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
215
7.2.1 Subgenus ' Euriccia : assimilative tissue consists of
vertical cell rows surrounding narrow vertical air canals.
R. cilifera (sic), R. glauca, R. dalslandica S.W. Amell,
R. beyrichiana, R. bifurca, R. ciliata, R. wamstorfii, R.
subbifurca, R. sorocarpci. Thalli in rosettes or not; small
or large; branches thick or thin; narrow or wide; margins
winged or not, round or acute, naked or with cilia; epi-
dermal cells rarely thick-walled.
7.2.2 Subgenus Ricciella : assimilative tissue consists of
irregular chambers, separated by walls one cell thick.
R. canaliculata, R. crystallina var. angustior (= R. cav-
ernosa), R. rhenana, R. fluitans, R. duplex, R. frostii, R.
huebeneriana. Thalli linear, little-branched or repeatedly
furcate, thick or thin, reticulate, occasionally aquatic,
mostly terrestrial, sometimes in rosettes, large or small,
dorsally pitted.
8. JONES (1957): tropical Africa
The usual two genera were recognized by Jones in The
‘Ricciaceae in Tropical Africa’.
8.1 Genus Ricciocarpus: R. natans. Very widely distributed;
floating in still water; with long pendant ventral scales.
8.2 Genus Riccia : subdivided into the subgenera Ricciella
and Euriccia.
8.2.1 Subgenus Ricciella (A. Braun) Boulay sensu Into : as-
similation tissue with air chambers (aquatic or terrestrial).
R. fluitans. Floating on water or growing on wet soil;
branches elongated, parallel-sided, 0. 5-1.0 mm wide; air
chambers occupying most of thallus; spores rare.
R. membranacea. Branches many times broader than
thick, tapering into thin wings; dorsally areolate, older
parts becoming cavernous; air chambers large, occupying
most of thallus, except for 2 or 3 layers of basal tissue in
median part.
R. moenkemeyeri Steph. Branches tapering, apically
sharply channelled; becoming pitted dorsally; scales dis-
tant, not reaching edge of thallus.
R. rautcmenii (synonym of R. cavernosa). Large, spongy
rosettes; margins of thallus thick.
R. intermedia E.W. Jones. Branches parallel-sided, api-
cally sharply grooved; air chambers medianly narrow and
inconspicuous, like in Euriccia, but wider toward the mar-
gins. Riccia intermedia was regarded by Jones as inter-
mediate between Ricciella and Euriccia with respect to
the width of the air chambers or air canals; it was later
placed in synonymy under R. discolor Lehm. & Lindenb.
by Pande & Udar (1958) and classified in Euriccia.
Jones refers to Duthie & Garside’s publications (1937;
1939) and stresses that Ricciella sensu lato contains sev-
eral well-marked groups of species which are worthy of
sectional, if not of subgeneric rank.
8.2.2 Subgenus Euriccia'. assimilation tissue with closely
packed filaments.
R. trichocarpa. Margins of thallus with long, hyaline
cilia.
R. nigrosquamata E.W. Jones (= R. berriei E.W. Jones),
R. nigerica E.W. Jones, R. lanceolata Steph., R. radicosa
Pearson, R. rhodesiae S.W. Amell, R. runssorensis Steph.,
R. congoana Steph., R. angolensis Steph., R. papillispora
Steph. (R. albomarginata Bisch. and R. limbata Bisch. are
confined to the southwestern Cape). Margins of thallus
without cilia, ventral scales extend to, or greatly exceed
margins of thallus, distant or approximate or imbricate;
hyaline or with hyaline margins or dark violet; thallus
winged or not, when flanks steeply ascending; spores sub-
globose or tetrahedral.
The type specimen of R. rhodesiae, S.W. Amell 1291
(S), is a mixed collection of R. rhodesiae and R. atropur-
purea Sim, and Jones mistakenly identified the R. citropur-
purea portion of the specimen as R. rhodesiae ; R. rhodesiae
and R. nigrosquamata were placed in synonymy under R.
congoana by Perold (1986b).
9. PANDE & UDAR (1958): India
9.1 Genus Riccia'. divided into subgenera Euriccia and
Ricciella.
9.1.1 Subgenus Euriccia'. thalli with compact assimilatory
zone and narrow air spaces.
R. melanospora Kashyap. Thallus bluish green; seg-
ments small; anteriorly sulcate, rest nearly flat; cilia both
on margins and on surface, small and broad.
R. wamstorfii. Thallus yellow-green; segments narrow,
linear, apex rounded; deeply sulcate anteriorly and sulcus
broader behind; cilia large.
R. crozalsii. Thallus bluish green; segments lanceolate;
anteriorly deeply sulcate, rest very broadly channelled.
R. tuberculcita Pande & Udar. Thallus small, about 3
times broader than high; tubercular thickenings on cells
of assimilatory filaments; spores irregularly reticulate or
papillate, winged.
R. discolor. Male plants comparatively smaller than fe-
male; spore reticulate, unwinged.
R. billardieri Mont. & Nees. Thallus large, 4-6 times
broader than high; spores reticulate, with prominent pro-
jections.
R. gangetica S. Ahmad. Thallus small, about three
times broader than high; spores black, with 8-16 small
reticulations across distal face.
9.1.2 Subgenus Ricciella'. thalli with loosely arranged as-
similatory zone and wider air spaces.
R. huebeneriana. Thalli narrow, repeatedly branched;
spores small.
R. plana (synonym of R. crystallina). Thalli narrow,
repeatedly branched; spores much larger.
R. frostii. Thalli forming well-defined rosettes, female
rosette normally larger than male; spores incompletely re-
ticulate.
Riccia cruciata is mentioned in the key, but there is
no description of it.
10. HASSEL DE MENENDEZ (1963): Argentina
Hassel de Menendez treated the Argentinian Ric-
ciaceae.
216
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
10.1 Genus Ricciocarpus: R. natans. Plants floating or
terrestrial; photosynthetic layer formed by several super-
imposed air chambers; ventral layer almost absent; scales
in 3-5 series on both sides of midline.
10.2 Genus Riccia : plants terrestrial; photosynthetic layer
formed by one layer of air spaces surrounded by walls of
adjoining cells or by columns of chlorophyllose cells; ven-
tral layer developed; scales in 1 or 2 series.
10.2.1 Subgenus Ricciella : photosynthetic tissue consist-
ing of air chambers separated by walls one cell thick;
pores surrounded by complete rings or not, cells similar
to the others in dorsal walls of air chambers.
R. paranaensis Hassel, R. stenophylla Spruce. Thalli
linear, capsules ventrally prominent as described by A.
Braun.
R. membranacea, R. crystallina (misidentified and is
R. cavernosa), R. plana, R. frostii, R. paraguayensis
Spruce, R. curtisii. Thalli frequently in rosettes; capsules
slightly or ventrally not prominent; spores separating at
maturity except in R. curtisii, where they are united in
tetrads.
10.2.2 Subgenus Riccia: photosynthetic tissue formed by
chlorophyllose columns separated by narrow canals.
R. lindmanii Steph. Thallus margins without cilia.
R. bialbistrata Hassel. Thallus margins with cilia.
R. iodocheila Howe. Apex of thallus with some purple
papillae.
R. austinii, R. andina Miill.Frib., R. plano-biconvexa
Steph., R. campbelliana, R. squamata Nees, R. fruchartii
Steph. Walls of dorsal cells not thickened.
R. sorocarpa, R. dorsiverrucosa Hassel. Walls of dorsal
cells thickened.
No formal or informal groupings were made in either
subgenus. Riccia crystallina, as treated by Hassel, is ac-
tually R. cavernosa, as the two species were frequently
confused until Jovet-Ast (1964, 1966) cleared up the mat-
ter. Hassel selected R. glauca as the lectotype of the genus
Riccia, because Howe’s lectotype, R. crystallina, belongs
in subgenus Ricciella and it is therefore contrary to pre-
vious practice.
The specimen, leg. Sleumer 1755, identified as R.
campbelliana by Hassel, has large dark red scales, in con-
trast to those from other specimens of this species, in
which they are inconspicuous, fragile and hyaline,
splashed with brown and purple patches (Perold & Volk
1988a). Schuster (1992a) has assigned it to a new sub-
species, R. campbelliana subsp. austrigena. Riccia dorsiver-
rucosa (as well as R. andina Miill.Frib.) were recently placed
in synonymy under R. mauryana Steph. by Jovet-Ast ( 1991 ).
1 I . ARNELL( 1963): southern Africa
In his book Hepaticae of South Africa, Arnell (1963)
recognized Muller's Oxymitraceae and the family Ric-
ciaceae in the suborder Ricciineae. For the rest he fol-
lowed the same classification here as in his earlier work
(Arnell 1956) on Scandinavian Ricciaceae. He made no
attempt to arrange the species in the genus Riccia into
sections or groups.
1 1 . 1 Genus Ricciocarpus: R. natans. Floating on water
(with long, serrate scales) or growing on mud; dorsal sur-
face leathery, reticulate, greyish green to dark green; air
chambers large; pores present, surrounded by 5 or 6 thin-
walled guard cells; ventral tissue thin; ventral face with
several rows of puiplish ventral scales, numerous and long
in aquatic form; oil bodies in scales and thallus; antheridia
in small groups, sunken in the midline of thallus; sporo-
gonia rare, immersed in thallus.
1 1 .2 Genus Riccia: most species only have land forms,
but some species in subgenus Ricciella have both terres-
trial and aquatic forms; dorsal surface of thallus not leath-
ery; pores lacking except in some species of subgenus
Ricciella: ventral scales generally small; green layer of
assimilative tissue consists either of vertical cell pillars
with interposed air-filled spaces or (consists) of walls of
air chambers; oil bodies lacking; antheridia scattered or
in groups, not crowded in special organs.
11.2.1 Subgenus Euriccia: assimilative tissue composed
of cell pillars surrounded by air spaces.
R. canescens (synonym of R. trichocarpa), R. crozalsii.
Margin of thallus with long cilia.
R. villosa Steph., R. albomarginata Bisch., R. concava
Bisch. Margin of thallus usually without cilia; dorsally
velvet-like by the presence of free cell pillars.
R. sorocarpa. Epidermal cells in 2 layers, second layer
with thick walls.
R. coronata Sim, R. natalensis Sim. Epidermal cells
with thin walls, some of them elongated and free.
R. atropurpurea , R. limbata, R. angolensis, R. albolim-
bata S.W. Arnell, R. albosquamata S.W. Arnell, R. cap-
ensis Steph., R. rhodesiae, R. pottsiana Sim, R. warnstorfii
(an introduced species), R. runssorensis, R. okahandjana
S.W. Arnell. Epidermal cells in one layer, not forming free
pillars, but an adherent dorsal layer; scales absent or present,
large or small, hyaline or purple to black.
1 1 .2.2 Subgenus Ricciella: assimilative tissue composed
of large air chambers with walls one cell thick.
R. fluitans, R. stricta A.V. Duthie ined. Thalli with
long, linear segments, usually aquatic plants or rarely to
frequently terrestrial.
R. purpurascens Lehm. Usually terrestrial, large plants;
tuber formation on ventral stolons.
R. perssonii S.A. Kahn, R. curtisii, R. spongosa S.W.
Arnell, R. compacta. Tetrads of spores permanently ad-
herent, male plants much smaller than female ones.
R. cupulifera, R. rautanenii, R. plana, R. crystallina.
Monoicous, except for R. cupulifera which is dioicous;
spores separating when mature; plants in rosettes; male
and female plants the same size or male plants slightly
smaller.
R. bullosa Steph. (Link ex Lindenb. is actually the
author), R. garsidei Sim, R. montaguensis S.W. Arnell, R.
volkii S.W. Arnell, R. rubricollis Garside & A.V. Duthie
ined. Plants not forming complete rosettes, simple or di-
chotomously branched, very thick.
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
217
Arnell (1957) had previously described several new
Riccia species based on collections made by Volk in Na-
mibia, but had failed to recognize that the species with
velvet-like dorsal surfaces (Arnell 1963) form a distinct
group (later named section Pilifer O.H. Volk); R. villosa,
R. albomarginata and R. concava belong together in this
group and are quite distinct from ciliate species; no R.
coronata Sim specimens could be traced; R. capensis, as
interpreted by Arnell, was R. nigrella, whereas R. capensis
Steph. is a synonym of R. limbata Bisch. (Perold & Volk
1988b); R. albosquamata was placed in synonymy under
R. albolimbata (Perold 1989); R. rhodesiae is a synonym
of R. congoana (Perold 1986b); R. pseudolimbata S.W.
Arnell is a synonym of R. angolensis ; R. chrystallina (sic)
is R. cavernosa and R. plana is a synonym of R. crystallina ;
R. montaguensis is a synonym of R. bullosa (Perold 1991c);
R. spongosa is a synonym of R. curtisii (Perold 1991a).
12. VANDEN BERGHEN (1972): Zaire, Zambia
Vanden Berghen reported on the Ricciaceae of Zaire’s
province Shaba and of Zambia. Ricciocarpus natans
specimens were listed, as well as several Riccia species,
but the latter were not assigned to any particular subgenus.
12.1 Genus Ricciocarpus: R. natans. Thallus with wide
air cavities and small pores surrounded by 6-8 cells on
the dorsal face; floating in water, with long violet scales,
or when at water’s edge, without long scales; oil bodies
isolated in specialized cells; antheridia and archegonia sur-
rounded by a rudimentary involucre in the median groove.
12.2 Genus Riccia: plants annual or perennial; terrestrial
or aquatic; thallus dichotomously branched, frequently
forming small rosettes; thalli with air cavities generally
narrow; ventral scales mostly present, sometimes evanes-
cent; without oil cells; antheridia and archegonia not sur-
rounded by an involucre.
R. membrancicea. Thalli very thin, 6— 1 0(— 1 5 ) times
wider than thick; lobes 2. 8^4.0 mm wide.
R. fluitcins. Plants freely Boating in water or stranded
on mud; capsules strongly protruding on ventral face of
thallus; lobes up to 1 mm wide; ventral scales absent or
very reduced and evanescent.
R. cavernosa , R. moenkemeyeri, R. intermedia , R. sy-
moensii Vanden Berghen. Terrestrial plants; capsules not
strongly protruding on ventral face of thallus; lobes gen-
erally 1-2 mm wide; ventral scales absent or very reduced,
or large and violet.
As mentioned before, R. intermedia has been synony-
mised under R. discolor. It also appears, from Vanden
Berghen's description and illustration of the spores of his
so-called R. fluitans , that he was actually dealing with
R. stricta.
13. JOVET-AST ( 1975): diverse areas
Twenty years ago Jovet-Ast studied the species R. pers-
sonii and R. curtisii , which retain their spores in perma-
nent tetrads. Previously, on account of the tetrad spores,
Austin (1869) had placed R. curtisii in his new genus.
Cryptocarpus , but Lindberg ( 1874) called attention to the
fact that the generic name, Cryptocarpus, was already in
use and proposed the name Thallocarpus, instead. Sub-
sequently. however, these plants were treated under sub-
genus Ricciella, until Thallocarpus was reinstated as an
independent subgenus by Jovet-Ast (1975).
14. CAMPBELL (1975, 1977): New Zealand
1 4. 1 Genus Ricciocarpos: R. natans. Plants in spongy, par-
tial rosettes, up to 20 mm in diameter; when floating in
ponds, little-branched and green or yellow-green in col-
our; dorsally firm and convex, with deep median furrow;
upper epidermis interrupted by simple air pores; com-
posed below of several series of large air chambers
bounded by unistratose walls; ventrally with few rhizoids
but with numerous conspicuous and characteristic pendant
scales, toothed, ribbon-shaped and reddish violet or
brownish green in colour; when temporarily stranded on
shore, freely branched; with numerous smooth and tuber-
culate rhizoids; scales only rudimentary; rarely fertile in
either aquatic or land form.
14.2 Genus Riccia: divided into two subgenera.
14.2.1 Subgenus Riccia: with a rather compact photosyn-
thetic layer consisting of more or less vertical filaments
separating narrow air chambers.
R. crozalsii. Margin of thallus with cilia, mainly near
apex, 200-500 pm long.
R. ciliata. Cilia abundant along margin, 600-900 pm
long.
R. sorocarpa. Dorsal groove deep and narrow.
R. bifurca, R. glauca. Dorsal groove shallow and wide.
14.2.2 Subgenus Ricciella: photosynthetic layer spongy
and consisting of unistratose walls enclosing polyhedral
air chambers.
R. fluitans. Thallus free-floating or stranded, not at-
tached: segments narrowly linear.
R. crystallina. In glassy green or grey-green spongy
rosettes; air chambers large and in several layers.
R. vesiculosa (Carrington & Pearson) Steph., formerly
thought to be R. bullosa (pers. comm.), green or olive-
green, strap-shaped and large; median air chambers nar-
row, those of the wings larger and in layers.
15. GROLLE ( 1976, 1983): Europe and adjacent regions
Grolle in his ‘Leberntoose Europas' divided Riccia, as
usual, into the subgenera Riccia and Ricciella (A. Br.)
Boulay. In 1983 he stated the authors of the latter subge-
nus to be (A. Br.) Rchb., with R. fluitans as the newly
selected lectotype. Two sections were recognized, namely
Ricciella and Spongodes (the latter with the newly se-
lected lectotype, R. crystallina). No attempt was made to
arrange the species into groups, nor are diagnostic char-
acters given.
16. NA-THALANG (1980): Australia
In her study of Australian Ricciae, Na-Thalang thought
it incorrect for the two subgenera, Riccia and Ricciella,
218
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
to be separated on the size of the air chambers, because
the characteristics of air chambers, pores and epidermal
cells ought to be considered more important than the size
of the air chambers.
16.1 Genus Riccia: monoicous or dioicous; complete or
incomplete rosettes or in gregarious patches; mostly land
forms; annual or perennial; upper surface normally sul-
cate; margins sometimes with cilia or scales of various
sizes; dorsal pail with compact tissue in vertical columns
or with loosely arranged tissue forming polyhedral air
chambers; capsules with neither seta nor foot, normally
embedded in thallus.
16.1.1 Subgenus Riccia : upper part of thallus composed
of compact tissue arranged in almost vertical columns; air
chambers narrow, without specialized air pores; epidermal
cells hyaline.
16.1.1.1 Section Vmdisquamata Na-Thalang: R. caroliniana
Na-Thalang. Dorsal part of thallus consists of compact, hya-
line tissue; chlorophyll-bearing layer at ventral side of thallus,
but almost whole thallus pellucid, destitute of chloroplasts
except a few towards apex, margins and ventral layer next
to scales; scales narrowly oblong, green, cells containing
chloroplasts, imbricate and persistent, 1 or 2 layers of cells
in thickness; branches furcate or bifurcate.
16.1.1.2 Section Riccia : chlorophyll-bearing layer at dor-
sal part of thallus; consists of compact vertical columns
of green cells terminated by hyaline epidermal cells, each
air space normally enclosed by 4 vertical columns; in
some species, air chambers close to the margin may be
enlarged, when surrounded by 5 or 6 columns.
Three groups are recognised.
16.1.1.2a Group Ciliatae: thalli bear cilia at margins and
sometimes on dorsal surface.
1 6. 1 . 1 ,2aa Subgroup Longiciliata: plants with long cilia
on thallus and on capsule.
R. longiciliata Na-Thalang, R. crinita Taylor, R. areo-
lata Na-Thalang. Closely related species, but with differ-
ent spore characters.
Seppelt (1983) subsequently reduced Na-Thalang’s R.
longiciliata and R. areolata to synonyms of R. crinita.
Riccia longiciliata , with n = 16, is regarded by him as
only a polyploid of R. crinita, with n = 8, and it was
concluded that the three species cannot be satisfactorily
delimited by spore characteristics, neither can they be dif-
ferentiated by morphological gametophyte characteristics.
16. 1.1. 2ab Subgroup Crozalsii: plants with short cilia on
thallus, none borne on capsule.
R. crozalsii, R. hlackii Na-Thalang, R. asprella Car-
rington & Pearson. Thalli small to larger; margins tumid
and raised; channel broad.
16. 1 . 1 .2b Group Squamatae: thalli with scales reaching to
or extending beyond margins.
16.1.1 .2ba Subgroup Macrospora: thalli with variable pur-
ple scales; spores globose.
R. macrospora Steph., R. gangetica, R. billardieri, R.
discolor. Colour of scales and thalli sensitive to environ-
mental change.
16. 1.1. 2bb Subgroup Limbata: scales dark purple; spores
triangular-globular, proximal face with triradiate mark.
R. limbata, R. nigrella. Colour of scales not easily
changed.
1 6. 1 . 1 ,2bc Subgroup Sorocarpa: scales hyaline; mostly an-
nuals.
R. sorocarpa, R. lamellosa. Introduced species.
R. marginata Carrington & Pearson, R. olgensis Na-
Thalang, R. rorida Na-Thalang. Australian species, prob-
ably endemic.
1 6. 1 . 1 ,2c Group Laevigatae: scales small, only present un-
der apex of thallus.
R. bifurca, R. albida. Introduced species; thallus mar-
gins rounded, the latter species being the only Riccia with
smooth and rounded spores.
16. 1 .2 Subgenus Ricciella: upper part of thallus composed
of rather loosely arranged chlorophyll-bearing tissue form-
ing reticulate one-layered cell plates; air chambers poly-
hedral, normally roofed over by green epidermal cells
with an air pore in the centre.
Two groups are recognized.
16.1.2a Group Terrestriae: land forms, sometimes growing
on mud.
16.1.2aa Subgroup Crystallina: annual plants; in round
and compact rosettes.
R. crystallina, R. cavernosa. Thalli not strap-like,
broader than 1.5 mm; capsules not bulging markedly on
ventral surface.
16. 1.2ab Subgroup Papulosa: large thalli, 3-6 mm wide.
R. papulosa Steph., R. spongiosula Na-Thalang. Plants
not strictly annual; forming rosettes only in young stages.
16.1.2ac Subgroup Vesiculosa: thalli smaller, 2-3(4) mm
wide; hygrophilous plants.
R. vesiculosa (Carrington & Pearson) Steph., R. mus-
cicola Steph., R. deserticola Steph., R. crassa Steph., R.
junghuhniana Nees & Lindb., R. collata Na-Thalang.
Scales mostly small and hyaline.
1 6. 1 ,2b Group Aquaticae-Terrestriae: thalli narrow-linear or
strap-like; multifurcate; capsules bulging on ventral surface.
R. luticola Na-Thalang, R. duplex, R. multifida Steph.
Plants growing in water or on land; upper surface marked
out by air chamber areas or not.
Na-Thalang’s groups were not given formal taxonomic
status, because she considered a worldwide appraisal of
the genus a necessity before formalizing taxa below the
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
219
level of subgenus. Schuster ( 1 992a), however, correctly
points out that these informal groupings are ‘nomenclatu-
rally irrelevant’.
1 7. JOVET-AST (1984): Australia
Jovet-Ast raised Na-Thalang’s (1980) section Viridi-
squamata (containing R. caroliniana) to subgeneric rank,
because of the very unusual structure of its lobes, which
could represent either a primitive stage, i.e. a relictual en-
demic of Australia, or else a parallel lineage to the genus
Riccia. Its spores are, however, comparable to those of
many other species of Riccia. Jovet-Ast, therefore, thought
it preferable to maintain it in the genus Riccia.
17.1 Genus Riccia
17.1.1 Subgenus Viridisquamata (Na-Thalang) Ast: R.
caroliniana. Dorsal part of thallus hyaline and compact;
ventral part of thallus chlorophyll-bearing, i.e. layers in-
verted compared with other species of Riccia ; ventral side
of lobes with rows of chlorophyllose lamellae which are
not scales; distal face of spores reticulate, forming 9 or
10 rounded areolae across diameter; proximal face simi-
larly ornamented.
18. VOLK (1983): Namibia and southern Africa (and
elsewhere)
In 1981 Volk described a new Riccia species, R. al-
bovestita , from Namibia. It, and others like it, are char-
acterized by a dorsal epithelium of loose, erect cell pillars,
which Amell (1963) had referred to as ‘velvet-like’, but
had not segregated into a distinct group. This was sub-
sequently done by Volk (1983), when he created his new
section Pilifer. He also proposed a new classification for
the genus Riccia, in an attempt to avoid the problems
caused by intermediate forms with regard to the width of
the air canals/air chambers. This classification was no
longer to be based on the width of the air chambers, but
rather on the number and size of the air pores in the dorsal
epithelium/epidermis of the thallus.
18.1 Genus: Riccia
18.1.1 Subgenus A. Riccia ( Euriccia auct.): outer dorsal
layer consisting of an epithelium of hyaline cells; without
sharply delimited air pores.
18.1.1.1 Section Viridisquamata: R. caroliniana. Chloro-
phyllose tissue limited to ventral side of thallus and scales.
18.1.1.2 Section Riccia | Lichenoides (Bisch.) Nees]: R.
glauca , R. sorocarpa, R. limbata, R. angolensis etc. Chlo-
rophyll mostly in dorsal tissues; ventral scales not green;
top cells of epithelium close together.
18.1.1.3 Section Pilifer O.H. Volk: R. villosa Steph., R.
albovestita O.H. Volk, R. concava Bisch. etc. Upper cells
of epithelium free, hair-like pillars.
18.1.2 Subgenus B. Spongodes (Nees) O.H. Volk: outer
dorsal layer consisting of an epidermis with chlorophyll
and sharply delimited air pores.
18.1.2.1 Section Thallocarpus: R. perssonii, R. curtisii.
Spores in permanent tetrads.
18.1.2.2 Section Spongodes Nees: R. crystallina, R. cav-
ernosa, R. volkii. Ripe spores free; sporangia opening dor-
sally.
18.1.2.3 Section Ricciella (A. Braun, pro gen.) Bisch.: R.
fluitans, R. canaliculata , R. stricta etc. Sporangia bulging
and opening ventrally.
19. SCHUSTER (1984, 1985): diverse areas
Schuster proposed a new subgenus, Leptoriccia, for R.
membranacea, as well as a third genus in the Ricciaceae,
namely his monotypic Pteroriccia R.M. Schust. to accom-
modate R. villosa Steph.
19.1 Genus Riccia
19.1.1 Subgenus Leptoriccia R.M. Schust.: R. membranacea.
Thallus very thin with vestigial ventral tissue; spores with
numerous papillae, not arising from a reticulum.
19.2 Genus Pteroriccia R.M. Schust.: R. villosa Steph.
Thallus with tall dorsal cell pillars and large erect, imbri-
cate ventral scales, margins serrate.
On account of the above characters Schuster thought
that Pteroriccia was at least as distinct from Riccia as
the water form of the separate, unrelated genus, Riccio-
carpus, which has long, trailing, ventral scales also with
serrate margins.
20. PEROLD (1986): southern Africa
In response to Schuster's publication on Pteroriccia
Perold (1986a) attempted to draw attention to O.H. Volk’s
section Pilifer , which was instituted for the reception of
all the then (and later) known Riccia species with tall,
loose dorsal cell pillars. She also pointed out that scale
margins vary considerably in some species of Riccia, from
crenate to serrate to having long, multicellular appendages
in a then, as yet, undescribed species. The new genus
instituted by Schuster was accordingly regarded as syn-
onymous with Riccia.
21. SCHUSTER (1985): worldwide
Schuster (1985), however, had already reduced the
status of his genus Pteroriccia (here regarded as a syno-
nym of section Pilifer O.H. Volk) to that of subgenus
Pteroriccia (R.M. Schust.) R.M. Schust. after restudying
the Pteroriccia complex and finding that the ventral scale
criterion, which had strikingly isolated his type species,
did not hold for several other taxa in the same taxonomic
unit. He also thought that Pilifer O.H. Volk was illegiti-
mate, as he had assumed (incorrectly, however) that no
type species had been designated, whereas Volk (1983)
had indeed selected R. albomarginata as the type species
of his section Pilifer. Schuster (1985) recognized six sub-
genera in the Ricciaceae.
220
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
21.1 Genus: Riccia
21.1.1 Subgenus Spongodes (Nees) O.H. Volk: dorsal
epidermis distinct, complete, becoming lacunose, chlo-
rophyllose, with pores; air chamers large, polyhedral;
ventral tissue several cell layers thick.
21.1.2 Subgenus Leptoriccia R.M. Schust.: dorsal epider-
mis distinct, complete, becoming lacunose, chlorophyl-
lose with pores; air chambers large, polyhedral; ventral
tissue vestigial.
21.1.3 Subgenus Thallocarpus [Austin (sic)] Ast: spores
coherent in permanent tetrads; plants unisexual, strikingly
heterothallic with dwarf males.
2 1 . 1 .4 Subgenus Riccia: epithelial tissues in mutually con-
nate cell rows between which vertical air canals are distinct.
21.1.5 Subgenus Pteroriccia (R.M. Schust.) R.M. Schust.:
epithelial tissues free-standing, independent multicellular
uniseriate hairs, formed of elongated cells; ventral scales
typically large, projecting beyond thallus margins.
21.1.6 Subgenus Viridisquamata (Na-Thalang) Ast: chlo-
roplasts limited to ventral strata of thallus; ventral lamellae
bistratose and chlorophyllose.
22. SCOTT (1985): southern Australia
22.1 Genus Riccia : thallus often distinctly coloured;
wedge-shaped, usually wider than thick; bifurcating fre-
quently and forming rosettes; ventral scales conspicuous
or not; antheridia and archegonia sunken in pits along
mid-line of thallus; sporophyte merely a ‘bag of spores’
also sunken in thallus; spores with elaborate sculpturing
on surface which seems to be diagnostic of each species;
divided into two subgenera which are ± distinct.
22.1.1 Subgenus Riccia ( sensu stricto ): upper layer of
thallus firm, consisting of compact vertical pillars of cells,
closely packed together and joined at the top, forming a
firm, close tissue with narrow, vertical air slots and an
even, homogeneous upper surface.
R. asprella, R. crozalsii, R. crinita. Thallus margins
with hairs, fine or coarse, few or abundant, confined to
apex or not.
R. limbata, R. nigrella. Medium-sized or small; bor-
dered by black ventral scales.
R. sorocarpa, R. cartilaginosa Steph. Smallish or large;
ventral scales hyaline and just reaching thallus margin.
R. bifurca. Upper surface broadly channelled.
R. lamellosa , R. rorida. Thai 1 i rimmed by white scales,
extending beyond margins.
R. albida. Upper surface narrowly grooved; chalky
white with calcareous incrustation.
22.1.2 Subgenus Ricciella : upper layer of thallus spongy;
loosely arranged chlorophyllous tissue, forming polyhe-
dral or large and irregular air chambers, usually with defi-
nite air pores; epidermal cells with chloroplasts except
around air pores.
R. crystal lina , R. cavernosa. Plants in circular rosettes;
upper epidermis granular or rough or cavernous even near
apex.
R. vesiculosa , R. spongiosula, R. papulosa. Plants dor-
sally sometimes becoming cavernous in older parts or
honeycombed, except at apex or only at base.
R. multifida, R. duplex. Thalli narrow, strap-like, less
than 1 .5 mm broad; thick or thin; with or without reticu-
lation; grooved along midline or only at apex.
23. VOLK & PEROLD (1986a): South Africa
In 1986 Volk & Perold described a new species, R.
schelpei. which is a very distinctive plant; it was assigned
by them to the new monotypic subgenus Chartacea
Perold, which is restricted to the winter rainfall region of
the Western Cape.
23.1 Genus: Riccia
23.1.1 Subgenus Chartacea: R. schelpei. Thallus when
dry, with papery texture, epidermis parchment-like with
thick-walled hyaline cells; air pores surrounded by a ring
of thin-walled, superimposed cells; spores reticulate-
faveolate on distal face; proximal face with small shallow
areolae, sprinkled with granules.
Later in the same year Volk & Perold (1986b) de-
scribed another new species, R. hirsuta , which was placed
in the new section Micantes O.H. Volk & Perold, subge-
nus Spongodes (Nees) O.H. Volk.
23.1.2 Subgenus: Spongodes
23.1.2.1 Section Micantes : R. hirsuta. Thallus dorsally
densely covered with crowded multicellular, hairlike, hyaline
shiny pillars; assimilation tissue with polyhedral air cham-
bers; ventral scales triangular and apically split into cellular
strands; spores single, ornamentation reticulate; spores with
3-5(6) large central areolae completely or incompletely sub-
divided, proximal face incompletely reticulate.
Unfortunately the description of R. hirsuta was based
on two distinct, but rather similar species; fresh collections
of R. hirsuta showed the assimilation tissue to have air
canals and not polyhedral air chambers and hence to be-
long to section Pilifer, subgenus Riccia ; section Micantes
was accordingly rejected by Volk & Perold (1990).
24. JOVET-AST (1986): Mediterranean countries
Jovet-Ast’s study of Mediterranean Ricciae was the
culmination of the examination of several thousand speci-
mens collected during 22 surveys around the Mediterra-
nean Sea. Although only subgenus Riccia (with section
Riccia ) and subgenus Ricciella (with sections Ricciella
and Spongodes) grow in the area treated, she listed five
subgenera in her classification: Riccia (with sections Ric-
cia and Pilifer ), Ricciella, Thallocarpus. Viridisquamata
and Leptoriccia. In her keys, of which there are several
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
221
to subgenus Ricciella , she referred to Grolle's lectotypifi-
cation of section Spongodes Nees and of section Ricciella.
No formal or informal groups or subgroups were recog-
nized in section Riccia, and varieties based on small dif-
ferences in size and colour were rejected.
24.1 Genus Riccia : thallus in the form of simple, linear
lobes or ramified 1—4 times or in complete or partial ro-
settes; compact or spongiose; dorsal surface flat or with
longitudinal median furrow; margins glabrous or bearing
papillae or cilia; lateral surfaces with scales, small or
large, colourless, or flecked with violet, orange, or dark
violet or entirely dark violet.
24.1.1 Subgenus Riccia : thalli not spongiose, without air
chambers; chlorophyllose tissue consisting of cells ar-
ranged in vertical rows, between them filiform aeration
canals that open dorsally by minute openings; terrestrial
species.
R. crustata Trab., R. lamellosa , R. melitensis, R. soro-
carpa, R. glauca. R. macrocarpa, R. sommieri , R. bifiurca,
R. subbifurca , R. wamstorfii, R. nigrella, R. trabutiana.
Thallus glabrous; upper surface white or not; scales vari-
ous.
R. atromarginata, R. papillosa, R. gougetiana. R. cili-
ifera , R. bicarinata , R. trichocarpa. R. cilicita , R. michelii,
R. beyrichiana, R. crozalsii. R. ligula. Thallus bearing cilia
or papillae.
24.1.2 Subgenus Ricciella'. thalli spongiose and with nu-
merous large lacunae opening to exterior; or thallus not
spongiose, air chambers opening dorsally via pores; sur-
rounding cells arranged stoma-like; air chambers sepa-
rated by mostly unicellular walls.
24.1.2.1 Section Spongodes : thallus spongiose; dorsal sur-
face bearing large lacunae or both lacunae and pores; cap-
sules not very prominent on upper surface of lobes,
enclosed in thallus; terrestrial species.
R. crystallina. R. cavernosa. Monoicous; thallus in ro-
settes.
R. frostii. Dioicous; pronouncedly heterothallic with
male thallus much smaller than female thallus.
24.1.2.2 Section Ricciellcr. thallus mostly not spongiose,
generally with dorsal epidermis bearing pores surrounded
by regularly arranged cells; capsules protuberant on ven-
tral surface of thallus; terrestrial or aquatic species.
R. perennis Steph.. R. huebeneriana , R. Jim tans, R. du-
plex, R. canaliculalu . Thallus with or without clear areo-
lation on dorsal surface; in R. canaliculata ventral apex
of lobes covered by white scale, in other species not.
25. DAMSHOLT & HALLINGBACK (1986): Fenno-
scandia
Also published in 1986 was Damsholt & Hallingback’s
report on the Ricciae of Fennoscandia, which contained
beautiful coloured photoprints to illustrate the different
colours of the thalli as well as outstanding drawings by
the Danish artist, Annette Pagh. Since they were dealing
with local species, only two subgenera were recognized,
neither were any sections separated in either of the sub-
genera.
25.1 Genus: Riccia
25.1.1 Subgenus Ricciella : thallus with air chambers in
assimilation tissue; secondarily adapted to damp or fresh
water environments since air pores are here used as a
floating mechanism.
R. cavernosa, R. huebeneriana. Land plants; in partial
or complete rosettes.
R. canaliculata, R. fluitans. The former species is ter-
restrial, whereas the latter is a land or a water plant; nei-
ther grows in rosettes.
25.1.2 Subgenus Riccia: thallus compact; assimilation tis-
sue with closely spaced vertical cell rows; adapted to dry
areas; upper surface of thallus closes up as the sides meet
and so dehydration is prevented.
R. bifurca, R. beyrichiana, R. sorocarpa, R. wamstorfii,
R. subbifurca, R. gothica Damsh. & Hallingb., R. glauca.
Thallus margins often glabrous.
R. ciliata, R. ciliifera. Thallus margins mostly ciliate.
R. dalslandica is placed in synonymy under R. ciliata
var. epilosa; R. glauca forma colorata S.W. Amell is
treated as a separate species, R. gothica, by the authors.
Jovet-Ast (1994) expresses some doubt that Damsholt &
Hallingback had indeed examined the true type specimen
of R. ciliata and argues that they may have confounded
R. ciliata and R. trichocarpa , since she had examined the
types of both and found them to be different.
26. VOLK & PEROLD (1990): South Africa
Volk & Perold in correcting their initial error (Volk &
Perold 1986b) now referred R. hirsuta to section Pilfer;
R. tomentosa, the other element on which the original de-
scription of R. hirsuta had been partly based, was referred
to subgenus Thallocarpus , section Pannosae (sect, nov.),
since its spores (absent in the original collection) are re-
tained in permanent tetrads. Riccia tomentosa and R. hir-
suta share triangular ventral scales with apical filamentous
strands and elongated dorsal cell pillars.
27. SMITH ( 1990): Britain and Ireland
Smith treated the liverworts of Britain and Ireland. He
commented that there seemed to be no general agreement
about the arrangement of species within the subgenus Riccia,
since Grolle (1983) had arranged them in alphabetical order
and the arrangements of Muller (1951-1958), Jovet-Ast
(1986) and others differed. He chose to follow Jovet-Ast as
hers was, at the time, the most recent authoritative account.
27.1 Genus Ricciocarpus: R. natans. Plants floating in
base-rich or neutral ponds, ditches and canals or on mud
of dried-out ponds; with conspicuous linear-lanceolate
ventral scales (terrestrial forms with small scales); dorsal
epidermis with small distinct pores and scattered oil cells.
222
Bothalia 25,2 ( 1995)
27.2 Genus Riccia : plants terrestrial or, if aquatic, sub-
merged; often winter ephemerals or annuals; ventral scales
small to larger; pores lacking or, if present, vestigial and
not surrounded by specialised cells; oil cells lacking.
27.2.1 Subgenus Ricciella: thallus with chambers; epider-
mis breaking down to form lacunae in older parts of thal-
lus or not; margins without cilia.
27.2.1.1 Section Spongodes: plants terrestrial; dorsal epi-
dermal cells in older parts of thallus breaking down to
form lacunae, rendering thallus spongy in appearance;
capsules embedded in thallus, not protruding strongly on
ventral side.
R. cavernosa, R. crystallina, R. huebeneriana. Plants
terrestrial; not strap-like; older parts spongy in appear-
ance; capsules not protruding strongly on ventral side of
thallus [except in R. huebeneriana (parenthesis mine)].
27.2.1.2 Section Ricciella : plants aquatic or terrestrial; epi-
dermal cells on dorsal side of thallus not breaking down,
older parts of thallus not spongy in appearance; capsules
protruding very strongly on ventral side.
R. canaliculata, R. fluitans, R. rhenana. Thallus not
channelled, except sometimes in older parts; not reticulate
or often reticulate; capsules common or rare.
27.2.2 Subgenus Riccia : thalli never spongy in appear-
ance; margins ciliate or not; dorsal epidermal cells fre-
quently soon lost; chlorophyllose tissue composed of
vertical columns with narrow air spaces, forming a com-
pact layer of green cells.
R. crozalsii. Thallus lobes with ciliate margins, cilia
curved over thallus when dry.
R. subbifurca, R. glaucci, R. bifurca, R. beyrichiana.
Thallus lobes with marginal cilia if growing under moist
conditions; not indexed over thallus when dry.
R. nigrella, R. sorocarpa. Thallus margins naked;
subepidermal cells of thallus lobes thick-walled in R. soro-
carpa.
28. VAN MELICK (1991): The Netherlands
Van Melick undertook a revision of 1 259 Dutch her-
barium collections of Riccia. Earlier bryologists in the
Netherlands evidently did not have a clear concept of
many Riccia species as many specimens had been misi-
dentified. Eleven species were retained by him and his
classification also follows that of Jovet-Ast ( 1986), but he
comments that there was no ‘eenduidige opvatting over
de taxonomische indeling van het genus Riccia ’.
28.1 Genus Riccia: plants once to several times dichoto-
mously furcate or in rosettes; dorsal surface of lobes
smooth or with stomata-like pores or else with raised epi-
dermal cells, otherwise with crater-like openings; ventral
surface of lobes with rhizoids and scales, these laterally
displaced with growth of thallus; on t.s. dorsally with wide
air chambers enclosed by green walls or with compact,
pal lisade-l ike assimilation tissue; ventral tissue paren-
chyma-like, lacking oil cells; monoicous or dioicous; cap-
sules sunken in thallus.
28.1.1 Subgenus Riccia: dorsal side of thallus not spongy,
lacking network of small areas, but epidermis with hya-
line, round or pear-shaped, generally ephemeral cells;
margins without or with cilia; assimilation tissue dorsal,
with compact, vertical cell rows, separated by narrow air
canals; ventral V?-2/ 3 of thallus compact storage tissue.
R. crozalsiii. Thallus lobes at margins with more than
20 cilia that arch over thallus when dry.
R. glauca, R. beyrichiana, R. bifurca, R. warnstorfii.
Thallus lobes without or with fewer than 20 cilia at mar-
gins and not arched over thallus when dry.
R. subbifurca. Thalli scattered, rarely in rosettes.
R. sorocarpa. Thallus lobes with deep, sharp groove;
upper epidermis 2-layered, subepidermis with thick-
walled cells.
28.1.2 Subgenus Ricciella: dorsal side of thallus with ob-
scure or clear network of small areas; epidermis uni-
stratose, sometimes with stoma-like pores, sometimes
lacunose; margins of thallus without cilia; assimilation
layer composed of loose tissue with two or more irregular
layers of large or small air chambers; storage tissue ventral
± V3 of thallus.
28. 1 .2. 1 Section Spongodes: plants growing on soil; dorsal
side of thallus, especially in the older parts, spongy,
caused by openings in epidermis; capsules ventrally bulg-
ing or not.
R. cavernosa. Thalli light green to yellow-green, turn-
ing brown with age; lobes 1. 0-2.5 mm wide; groove ab-
sent; capsules sunken into thallus or dorsally slightly
bulging.
R. huebeneriana. Thalli bright green, mostly with rose
to wine-red flecks; lobes 0.3-1 .0 mm wide; grooved; cap-
sules bulging ventrally.
28.1.2.2 Section Ricciella: plants growing on soil or float-
ing in water; dorsal side of thallus not spongy; epidermis
without openings; capsules bulging ventrally.
R. canaliculata. Thallus lobes narrower at tips; ventral
scales 1. 5-2.0 times wider than high, apical scale reflexed
cap-like over dorsal side.
R. fluitans. Thallus lobes widening at tips; ventral
scales 2-5 times wider than high, apical scale not reflexed
cap-like over dorsal side; land form or water form.
Riccia duplex and R. rhenana were not accepted as
good species, because of the lack of constant diagnostic
characters to differentiate them from R. canaliculata and
R. fluitans respectively.
29. VOLK & PEROLD; PEROLD & VOLK; PEROLD
( 1 984- 1991): southern Africa
The Ricciaceae of southern Africa continued to be
studied by Volk (1979-1984), then by Volk & Perold or
by Perold & Volk (1984-1990) and lately by Perold
(1991). Several new species were described between
them.
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
223
In her Ph.D. thesis, Perold (1991a) recognized the fol-
lowing taxa in the Ricciae: subgenus Riccia, with two sec-
tions, Riccia (which was divided into the informal groups,
‘Ciliatae’ and ‘Squamatae’) and Pilifer, for which Schuster’s
subgenus Pteroriccia had not been adopted, as the compo-
sition of the air canals is no different from those in Riccia ;
subgenus Ricciella which was also divided into two sections,
Spongodes (with two groups, ‘Crystallina' and ’Vesiculosa’),
and Ricciella ; to subgenus Chartacea , R. schelpei was as-
signed and to subgenus Thallocarpus, R. curtisii, R. corn-
pacta and R. perssonii ; section Pannosae was elevated to
subgenus Pannosae (Perold) Perold. (See Perold’s proposed
classification of sub-Saharan Ricciae on p. 227.)
30. JOVET-AST (1991, 1993): Latin America
Jovet-Ast, in the study of the Ricciae of Latin America,
listed the five subgenera previously recognized by her
(Jovet-Ast 1986): Riccia, Viridisquamata, Ricciella, Thal-
locarpus, Leptoriccia and added a sixth one, Chartacea.
Only four of these are from the area treated in these works,
namely Riccia , Thallocarpus, Ricciella and Leptoriccia.
In the subgenus Riccia, section Riccia, she used Stephani's
(1898) two units, the Ciliatae and the Inermes, but intro-
duced a refinement by distinguishing a third one, the
Papillatae, for species with papillose lobes. Her groups
were not given a specified rank and are informal.
30.1 Genus Riccia : thalli compact or spongiose; dorsal
surface flat or with longitudinal median furrow; margins
glabrous, or bearing papillae or cilia: lateral surfaces with
scales.
30.1.1 Subgenus Riccia : chlorophyllose tissue compact,
consisting of cells arranged in vertical rows with narrow
air spaces between; epidermal pores simple.
30.1.1.1 Papillatae: margins of thallus lobes with papillae.
R. atromarginata var. atrornarginata. Margins of lobes
obtuse, papillae on the margins and lateral surfaces,
60-210 pm long, smooth.
R. violacea Howe var. violacea, R. violacea var. laevis
Ast. Papillae on margins and lateral surfaces of lobes
25-130 pm long, granular or smooth.
R. iodocheila. Margins of lobes acute; papillae rare.
30.1.1.2 Ciliatae: margins of lobes with cilia.
R. horrida Ast, R. trichocarpa, R. subdepilata Ast. R.
enyae Ast, R. cubensis S.W. Amell. Lobes mostly abundantly
and densely ciliate to base.
R. brcisiliensis Schiffn., R. lindmanii. Lobes with few.
sparse cilia.
30.1.1.3 Inermes: thallus margins glabrous, lacking papil-
lae or cilia.
30.1.1.3a Group 1: R. albida. Lobes calcified; spores almost
smooth.
30.1.1.3b Group 2: R. albopunctata Ast, R. campbelliana.
Lobes not calcified; with idioblasts.
30.1.1.3c Group 3: R. nigrella , R. boliviensis Ast, R.
squamata. Lobes not calcified; lacking idioblasts; scales
brilliantly black.
30. 1 . 1 .3d Group 4: R. vitalii Ast, R. ridleyi A.Gepp, R.
wainionis Steph., R. ekmanii S.W. Amell. Lobes not cal-
cified; lacking idioblasts; scales hyaline or violet; cells
with 2 thickened bands.
30.1. 1.3e Group 5: lobes not calcified; lacking idioblasts;
scales hyaline; cells without thickened bands.
30. 1 . 1 ,3ea Subgroup 1 : R. mauryana. Inferior walls of epi-
dermal cells granulose.
30. 1.1. 3eb Subgroup 2: R. sanguineisporis Ast. Inferior
walls of epidermal cells smooth; cells of dorsal tissue all
with thick walls.
30.1.1.3ec Subgroup 3: R. sorocarpa, R. erythrocarpa Ast.
Inferior walls of epidermal cells smooth; cells of dorsal
tissue not all with thick walls.
30.1.1.3ed Subgroup 4: R. lamellosa, R. viannae Ast. In-
ferior walls of epidermal cells smooth; cells of dorsal tis-
sue with thin walls; scales white, extending beyond
margins of lobes.
30. 1.13ee Subgroup 5: R. ianthina Ast, R. subplana
Steph., R. plano-biconvexa, R. grandis Nees, R. australis
Steph., R. taeniaeformis Ast, R. fruchartii , R. elliottii
Steph., R. breutelii Hampe ex Steph.. R. brittonii Howe,
R. howellii Howe. Inferior walls of epidermal cells
smooth; cells of dorsal tissue with thin walls; scales hya-
line or tinted with violet, not extending beyond margins
of lobes.
30.1.2 Subgenus Thallocarpus: R. curtisii. Dorsal tissue
with air chambers; dorsal epidermis with pores enclosed
by cells, sometimes with lacunae; scales absent; spores
fused in tetrad, surrounded by external layer of exine.
30.1.3 Subgenus Leptoriccia: R. membranacea. Thallus
thin, one layer of lacunae and 2 or 3 layers of cells; scales
present or reduced or absent; spores free at maturity,
spherical, 40-67 pm in diameter, external layer of exine
surrounding each spore; sporoderm ornamented with fine
spinules.
30.1.4 Subgenus Ricciella: thallus thick, up to 15 layers
of cells, spongy; spores tetrahedral, diameter greater than
65 pm; sporoderm ornamented with alveoli or tubercles.
30.1.4.1 Section Spongodes: thalli spongy, divided into
wide lobes; capsules hardly projecting on the two surfaces
of lobes; scales small or very reduced or absent.
R. crystallina, R. cavernosa. Thalli in rosettes, spongy.
10-35 mm in diameter.
224
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
30.1.4.2 Section Ricciella: thalli wide and deeply divided
or in narrow strips; capsules projecting on ventral surface
of lobes; scales small or rarely reaching edge of lobes.
R. frostii , R. paraguayensis Spruce. Dioicous; het-
erothallic; female plants in rosettes.
R. chiapasensis Ast, R. dussiana Steph.; R. geissleriana
Ast, R. hegewcmiana Ast. Monoicous; lobes 1 .5^1.0 mm
wide; grouped together.
R. jovet-astiae Vianna emend. Vianna, R. crassifrons
Spruce, R. bahiensis Steph., R. stenophylla, R. limicola
Ast, R. paranaensis. Lobes 0.3-1. 5 mm wide.
31. SCHUSTER ( 1992): North America (and elsewhere)
Schuster (1992a) maintained that infrageneric classifi-
cations in the genus Riccia were still unresolved. He now
adopted a multiple system with eight recognizable sub-
genera, although he conceded that his attempts at dividing
them up into a series of complexes and sections were
largely provisional, since he collected chiefly in North
America and Europe. He thought that it was up to students
residing in the other areas to test the validity of his pro-
posed new sections, and that other sections from Australia
and Africa would without doubt have to be recognized.
He nevertheless instituted 10 new sections and formally
provided them with Latin descriptions and designated type
species.
31.1 Genus Riccia : plants usually small; closely prostrate,
normally on soil, rarely aquatic; annual to perennial; in
rosettes or hemirosettes, occasionally gregarious; seg-
ments generally with a longitudinal dorsal groove which
disappears proximally; thallus structure either with dis-
tinct, persistent, rarely disintegrating epidermis with pores,
overlying polyhedral air chambers or without a continu-
ous, defined epidermis and aerenchyma with vertical ca-
nal-like air chambers; thallus margins naked or with
papillae, cilia or setae; ventral scales often inconspicuous;
oil bodies absent; antheridia and archegonia sunken into
thallus; sporophyte consisting of spherical capsule con-
taining spores.
31.1.1 Subgenus Riccia : thalli with photosynthetic tissue
compact, arranged in closely contiguous vertical cell rows
separated by slender vertical air canals; dorsal epithelial
cells breaking down, the hypodermal layer persistent,
regularly arranged; scales small to large; cilia or papillae
often present; spore release dorsal; spores single.
31.1.1.1 Section Riccia: thallus margins blunt or rounded,
naked or with short cilia (under 300 pm); lacking special-
ized oil cells; scales relatively small, usually colourless or
vestigial, failing to reach thallus margins; sulcus weakly
impressed, soon widening and disappearing posteriorly.
3 1.1. 1.1 a Subsection Riccia: thalli never calcified and
chalk-white dorsally; nearly always forming rosettes; spo-
rangia tending to bulge more on ventral side of thallus
than on dorsal; spores polar, with clearly defined wing
margins.
R. glauca, R. hirta, R. tenella Jacobs, R. bifurca, R.
warnstorfii, R. beyrichiana, R. califomica, R. setigera
R.M. Schust. Monoicous; thalli ciliate or not.
R. ozarkiana McGregor. Dioicous; dorsal sulcus wide.
3 1.1.1. lb Subsection Albidae R.M. Schust.: dorsal surface
of thallus calcified, chalk-white; pores open into canals
bounded by 5-7 cell rows; deep dorsal groove not wid-
ening posteriorly.
R. albida (= 1R. crustata). Epithelial cells persistent,
tumid or sometimes conoidally inflated, rough with se-
creted calcium carbonate. This subsection was previously
a section in Schuster (1992a).
31.1.1.2 Section Lamellosae R.M. Schust.: plants always
naked on dorsal surface and margins; epidermal cells usu-
ally ephemeral and collapsing to irregular remnants, not
thick-walled; dorsal groove shaip and usually ± persistent;
scales two-ranked, usually well developed.
R. lamellosa Raddi subsp. lamellosa , R. lamellosa
subsp. austini R.M. Schust.. R. andina Mull.Frib. subsp.
andina, R. andina subsp. chionophora R.M. Schust., R.
albolimbata. Ventral scales hyaline, whitish, projecting be-
yond thallus margins.
R. albolimbata is a southern African taxon which
Schuster now also reports from North America.
Jovet-Ast (1994) found spores in the type specimen of
R. andina and has concluded that it is synonymous with
R. mauryana , which Schuster has placed in another sec-
tion, namely Sorocarpae.
R. macallisteri, R. dictyospora, R. nigrella, R. camp-
belliana Howe subsp. campbelliana , R. campbelliana
subsp. austrigena R.M. Schust. Ventral scales not con-
spicuously projecting beyond moist thallus margins, usu-
ally pigmented.
31.1.1.3 Section Sorocarpae R.M. Schust.: monoicous;
thalli light green; less compact than in section Sommieri ;
epithelial cells with thick bases; hypodermal cells firm;
thallus margins lacking cilia; scales two-ranked and small;
dorsal groove deep.
R. sorocarpa subsp. sorocarpa , R. sorocarpa subsp.
arctica R.M. Schust., R. sorocarpa subsp. erythrophora
R.M. Schust., R. dorsiverrucosa, R. mauryana. Ventral
scales small, obscure, not or hardly imbricate, colourless
or castaneous.
In her experience, Jovet-Ast (1994) finds R. sorocarpa
to be a stable species, although there are certain modifi-
cations in the colour of the lobes and scales, in the thick-
ness of the epidermal cell walls and in the diameter of
the spores and size of the wing. She states that she is
inclined to reject Schuster’s subspecies of R. sorocarpa
as they are based on a very small number of specimens
seen by him and that the rank of subspecies is too impor-
tant to designate to such weak variations.
31.1.1.4 Section Sommieri R.M. Schust.: dioicous; thalli
deep green, with vertical purple flanks; very compact and
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
225
thick; epidermal cells delicate and hypodermal ones strik-
ingly thickened.
R. sommieri. Ventral scales large, imbricate, blackish
purple.
31.1.1.5 Section Atromarginatae R.M. Schust.: thalli dull,
bluish green and deep purple or purple-black laterally;
with a tendency to develop both blunt papillae and hyaline
sharp, rigid cilia mostly under 80 pm long; spores opaque,
nonpolar.
R. atromarginata forma atromarginata , R. atromargi-
nata forma glabra Levier ex Mull.Frib., R. violacea var.
violacea Howe, R. violacea var. iodocheila (Howe) R.M.
Schust., R. violacea var. laevis R.M. Schust. Ventral scale
small, often rudimentary, black-purple; margins some-
times with papilliform cells.
This section evidently consists of highly problematical
species, subspecies, varieties and formae that need to be
clarified.
31.1.1.6 Section Ciliiferae R.M. Schust.: thalli robust;
ventrally with large keel and at apices often forming tu-
bers; margins winged, often ciliate; sulcus deep, soon dis-
appearing; scales hyaline, whitish, semicircular.
R. ciliifera, R. gougetiana , R. erinacea Schiffn., R.
melitensis (from Malta). Thallus surfaces and margins
mostly eciliate or with cilia 100-325 pm long.
Jovet-Ast (1994) doubts whether R. melitensis is placed
correctly in this section, since it lacks marginal cilia; she
also prefers to treat R. erinacea as a variety of R.
gougetiana namely var. armatissima Levier ex Mull.Frib. ,
because all its characteristics resemble those of R.
gougetiana , except for the abundance of bristles.
31.1.1.7 Section Ciliatae R.M. Schust.; plants copiously
ciliate with tapered, sharp cilia, 300-1000 pm long; me-
dian sulcus sharp near apices, soon broadened and shal-
low; flanks swollen; scales small, hyaline to purplish.
R. ciliata subsp. ciliata , R. ciliata subsp. canescens
(Steph.) R.M. Schust., R. ciliata subsp. grisea R.M.
Schust., R. ciliata subsp. trichocarpa (Howe) R.M.
Schust., R. crinita. Cilia very thick-walled along at least
one side, up to 1150 pm long; flanks usually purplish to
purplish black.
Jovet-Ast (1983) has shown that R. canescens Steph.
is a synonym of R. trichocarpa and she finds it unaccept-
able (Jovet-Ast 1994) that R. trichocarpa can be consid-
ered a subspecies of R. ciliata.
31.1.1.8 Section Bicarinatae R.M. Schust.: R. bicarinata.
Thalli at margins with groups of 2-3 basally connate,
thick-walled, sharp, roughened cilia; flanks ascending,
blunt at margins; dorsally with sulcus soon widening.
31.1.1.9 Section Albosquamatae R.M. Schust.: R. al-
bosquamata S.W. Amell. Thalli without cilia or papillae;
ventral scales with regularly oriented, almost quadrate,
very firm-walled cells.
Amell (1957, 1963) had based his description of R.
albosquamata on two white-scaled species (Perold 1989),
R. albolimbata and another which was later named R. ar-
genteolimbata, using characters from both. R. albosqua-
mata is regarded as a synonym of R. albolimbata ; Schuster
did not include this new section Albosquamatae in his
later treatment (Schuster 1992b).
3 1 . 1 .2 Subgenus Ricciella : most species terricolous or
sometimes aquatic; dorsal epidermis chlorophyllose,
smooth or with age lacunose; pores present although
sometimes vestigial; thallus margins always lacking cilia;
air chambers large; ventral scales in a single median row,
semilunate, or (if 2-ranked) much reduced; sporophytes
releasing spores ventrally or dorsally.
3 1 . 1 .2. 1 Section Ricciella'. segments narrow and lingulate to
linear, under 0.8 mm wide; dorsal epidermis normally per-
sistent. usually perceptibly areolate; pores not enlarging.
R. fluitans, R. stenophylla, R. rhenana, R. canaliculata,
R. duplex. R. huebeneriana subsp. huebeneriana, R. hue-
beneriana subsp. sullivantii (Austin) R.M. Schust., R.
paranaensis. Scales remaining in a single median row or
soon splitting into 2 rows; capsules protruding ventrally;
some species aquatic or land plants.
Schuster (1992b) places R. perennis in synonymy un-
der R. canaliculata , as Muller (1953-1958) had done be-
fore him, but this is emphatically rejected by Jovet-Ast
(1994) who states that they are so different in appearance
that one can recognize them even with the naked eye.
31.1.2.2 Section Cavemosae R.M. Schust.: thalli in ro-
settes, fleshy and succulent; photosynthetic tissue loose,
air chambers large, polyhedral: dorsal epidermis delicate;
pores enlarging with age and thallus becoming lacunose.
R. cavernosa. R. crystallina. Ventral scales apparently
lacking or small and ephemeral.
Schuster (1992a) remarks that his section Cavemosae
is perhaps identical with Nees’s Spongodes but he finds
the latter ambiguous because it includes both R. bullosa
and R. crystallina. Whether R. bullosa remains in section
Spongodes is not mentioned. Perold (1991a) referred R.
bullosa to section Spongodes , group 'Vesiculosa’.
Schuster (1992b) notes that the prior usage of R. crys-
tallina (for R. cavernosa sensu Jovet-Ast 1964; 1966) and
R. plana (for R. crystallina sensu Jovet-Ast) was adopted
by all workers and should have been preserved by perti-
nent lectotypification. Riccia crystallina has been lecto-
typified by Perold ( 1992) with the typotype held at FI and
shows that Jovet-Ast was correct after all.
31.1.2.3 Section Frostii R.M. Schust.: R. frostii. Growing
in rosettes; heterothallic with small male plants: photo-
synthetic tissue relatively compact with air chambers nar-
row and tall; scales lacking or vestigial; spores dorsally
released.
31.1.3 Subgenus Leptoriccia : R. membranacea. Thalli
delicate, exceedingly flat and thin, chiefly consisting of
226
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
epidermis and air chambers; ventral tissue vestigial; scales
seemingly absent; sporangia ventrally protruding, spores
single, spherical, apolar, covered in spines.
31.1.4 Subgenus Thallocarpus : dorsal epidermis chloro-
phyllose, with pores, becoming lacunose; thalli spongy,
soft-textured; strongly heterothallic with much smaller
male plants; assimilation tissue with large and high air
chambers in 1-3 layers; spore release dorsal; spores in
tetrads; rhizoids mostly smooth or in part conspicuously
tube rcul ate.
3 1 . 1 .4. 1 Section Thallocarpus : thalli with dorsal surface
smooth; ventral scales lacking or vestigial; spores of tetrad
separated by distinct, ± smooth connecting band; spore
surface with spine-like tubercles.
R. curtisii, R. leptothallus R.M. Schust., R. howei R.M.
Schust. Plants forming rosettes or irregularly gregarious,
with or without colour dimorphism in the sexes.
31.1.4.2 Section Chaetoriccia R.M. Schust.: R. tomentosa.
Distinct from sect. Thallocarpus in (a) thalli dorsally
shaggy-haired, with long free-standing filaments formed
of elongated cells; (b) ventral scales conspicuous, hyaline,
triangular, apices bearing filaments formed of several
cells; (c) spore tetrads only obscurely tetrahedral, very
closely armed with papillae.
Riccia tomentosa was placed in subgenus Thallocar-
pus, section Pannosae by Volk & Perold (1990) and Pan-
nosae was later elevated to the rank of subgenus (Perold
1991), but these must have escaped Schuster’s notice,
when he created the new section Chaetoriccia for R.
tomentosa.
31.1.5 Subgenus Chartacea: R. schelpei. Dorsal epidermis
firm, thick-walled, echlorophyllose; pores conspicuous,
surrounded by 5 or 6 small, thin-walled cells elevated
above epidermal cells; thallus grooved, margins acute;
gametangia limited to groove; spores single.
3 1 . 1 .6 Subgenus Micantes : R. hirsuta. Dorsal epidermis
densely invested with tapered ciliform ( 1 )2— 7-celled
‘hairs’; pores obscure; ventral scales large, 2-ranked,
shaggy; spores (95)115-125(130) pm in diameter.
As pointed out above, the original description of R.
hirsuta was based on two distinct, but superficially rather
similar species, R. hirsuta (section Pilifer) and R. tomen-
tosa (subgenus Thallocarpus, section Pannosae, (Volk &
Perold 1990)). It is regrettable that the initial mistake by
Volk & Perold was perpetuated by Schuster (1992a, b).
31.1.7 Subgenus Pteroriccia: epithelial cells in the form
of free-standing, independent multicellular uniseriate and
often tapered hairs, mostly formed of elongated cells; dis-
tal cells of epithelial filaments persistent, typically smaller,
often conoidal and/or conspicuously elongated.
R. villosa, R. parvo-areolata O.H. Volk & Perold.
Mostly with large ventral scales projecting beyond thallus
margins.
31.1.8 Subgenus Viridisquamata : R. caroliniana. Dorsal
tissues devoid of chlorophyll, which is almost wholly lim-
ited to ventral strata of thallus; ventral surface with bi-
stratose chlorophyllose transverse lamellae in V-shaped
configurations, these giving rise to reduced unistratose
ventral scales.
31.2 Genus Ricciocarpus : R. natans. Plants floating, oc-
casionally terrestrial; dorsal surface with distinct pores
surrounded by 5 or 6 cells; air chambers large and con-
spicuous; ventral scales linear, numerous, sword-like; oil
bodies present; antheridia sunken in thallus or along me-
dian groove.
DISCUSSION
The above treatment has resulted in numerous species
being assigned to different sections and groups in the
works by Jovet-Ast (1991, 1993), and Schuster (1992a,
b). One is also faced with the anomalous situation, that
in two articles in the same publication, following directly
on one another (Perold 1993; Fischer 1993), the same
taxon, R. vulcanicola Eb. Fisch., is placed in two different
sections, since Perold followed the time-honoured tradi-
tion of placing R. crystallina (and its allies, in this case
R. vulcanicola ) in section Spongodes Nees, whereas Fis-
cher chose to follow Schuster (1992a, b), and placed it in
section Cavemosae.
Anyone is, of course, free to follow the treatment of
their choice, but for later students, it could be very con-
fusing. Flowever laudable the motive for arranging the
large number of Riccia species into a series of more or
less natural complexes or sections, so that they can be
more easily ‘digested’, six of the 11 new sections pro-
posed by Schuster (1992a) in the genus Riccia have only
one species and four of the subgenera also only have one
representative each. So, are we really making progress or
are we just proliferating the number of higher ranking
taxa, some of which may not stand the test of time? It
calls to mind a remark attributed to the late Prof. Tom
Harris of Reading University, ‘You can always make any
genus (or subgenus for that matter) uniform merely by
making it monospecific, and thereby defeating the object
of classification’.
It is as well to bear in mind Hassel de Menendez’s
(1976) cautionary advice, ‘since the nomenclatural system
does not allow us to abandon completely names which
are no longer required, continuing in this way will only
result in the accumulation of too many names, each of
which will be protected by the Code’.
Until more revisions worldwide have been completed,
using methods such as biochemical and DNA analysis,
enzyme electrophoresis, multivariate analysis, TEM stud-
ies of the ultrastructure of the spore wall, like that of
Thaithong (1982), and cultivation experiments, it may be
wiser to use informal groups. Once sufficient data have
been gathered hepaticologists should come to an agree-
ment in defining the limits of subgenera, sections, species
and subspecies in the Ricciae.
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
227
I am not well acquainted with the Ricciae of North Amer-
ica, Latin America, the Mediterranean and Australia, but for
sub-Saharan Africa, I propose the following classification,
which is quite similar to that of Perold (1991), which, being
in a thesis, is not widely known or available. As yet, only
informal groups are recognized; see also Perold (1995): A
survey of the Ricciaceae of tropical Africa.
32. PEROLD (1995): sub-Saharan Africa
32.1 Genus Ricciocarpos: R. natans. Thalli floating or ter-
ricolous; assimilation tissue with large air chambers in
several tiers; scales long, pendant, purple ribbons, small
in land form, margins dentate; oil cells present; gametangia
along deep central groove; monotypic.
32.2 Genus Riccia : thalli mostly terricolous; assimilation
tissue either compact, with cell columns enclosing narrow
vertical air canals, or spongy, with air chambers; scales
small to large, imbricate, mostly rounded, margins
smooth, rarely denticulate; oil cells absent; gametangia
along groove or scattered; polytypic.
32.2.1 Subgenus Riccia : thallus dorsally with an epithe-
lium of mostly thin-walled cells, echlorophyllose, uni- or
bistratose or bearing free-standing cell pillars; air pores
numerous, generally small, regular, intercellular spaces;
assimilation tissue compact; thallus margins naked or
bearing cilia or mammillate cells; spores single.
32.2.1.1 Section Riccia : epithelium uni- or bistratose.
32.2.1.1a Group Ciliatae: R. trichocarpa , R. crozalsii, R.
microciliata O.H. Volk & Perold, R. natalensis. Epithe-
lium unistratose; thallus margins ciliated.
32.2.1.1b Group Mammillatae: R. mammifera O.H. Volk
& Perold. Epithelium unistratose; thallus margins, espe-
cially at the apex, with a row of mammillate cells.
32.2.1.1c Group Squamatae:
R. sorocarpa, R. atropurpurea. R. lanceolata. R. nigerica.
Epithelium uni- or bistratose. generally with some cell walls
thickened; thallus margins glabrous; scales not conspicuous.
R. congoana, R. nigrella, R. limbata, R. angolensis , R.
okahandjana. Epithelial cells without thickened walls;
thallus margins glabrous; scales large, dark, black or red-
dish black, to violet.
R. macrocarpa. Scales brown with violet blotches;
idioblasts present throughout thallus. Sergio (1991) has
placed R. campbelliana in synonymy under R. macro-
carpa.
R. pottsiana , R. runssorensis , R. rosea O.H. Volk &
Perold, R. radicosa , R. erubescens Perold. Scales pink to
red; idioblasts absent.
R. albolimbata , R. alboporosa Perold, R. albomata
O.H. Volk & Perold, R. argenteolimbata O.H. Volk &
Perold, R. bicolorata Perold. R. lamellosa , R. montana
Perold, R. saharensis Steph. ex Ast. R. somaliensis Perold.
Scales predominantly white or hyaline, often encrusted
with calcium deposits.
32.2. Lid Group Intermediatae: R. discolor , R. symoensii.
Assimilation tissue medianly compact, air spaces widen-
ing toward wings.
32.2.1.2 Section Pilfer. epithelium in free-standing 2-5(6)-
celled, uniseriate pillars, top cells variously shaped, soon col-
lapsing, not regularly orientated; scales small to large,
rounded and smooth at margins, rarely triangular and dentate
or apically filiform.
R. alatospora O.H. Volk & Perold, R. albomarginata
Bisch.. R. albovestita, R. ampullacea Perold, R. concava
Bisch., R. elongata Perold, R. furfuracea Perold, R. han-
tamensis Perold, R. parvo-areolata , R. pulveracea Perold.
R. simii Perold, R. trcichyglossum Perold, R. vitrea Perold.
Scales rounded, margins smooth.
R. hirsuta. Scales triangular, apices split into several loose
cellular strands.
R. villosa. Scales triangular, margins dentate.
32.2.2 Subgenus Ricciella: thalli dorsally with an epider-
mis of thin-walled, generally chlorophyllose cells; air
pores mostly delimited, well spaced, fewer, often becoing
lacunose; assimilation tissue spongy with polyhedral air
chambers enclosed by unistratose cell plates; scales mostly
hyaline or violet and inconspicuous, distant, often evanes-
cent; sporangia deeply imbedded or bulging somewhat
above or below; spores single.
32.2.2.1 Section Spongodes: thalli in rosettes; spongy.
32.2.2. 1 a Group Crystallina: R. crystallina. R. cavernosa,
R. vulcanicola Eb. Fisch., R. moenkemeyeri , R. hueben-
eriana. Monoicous; spores completely or incompletely re-
ticulate.
32.2.2.1b Group Cupuliferae: R. cupulifera , R. frostii.
Dioicous; heterothallic with smaller male plants; spores
foveolate or with vermiculate ridges.
32.2.2.1c Group Vesiculosa: R. bullosa. R. garsidei , R.
volkii , R. rubricollis. Thalli rarely in rosettes, swollen to
somewhat flatter, usually becoming cavernous; dorsally
deeply grooved along entire length of branch or only api-
cally; scales small, two-ranked.
32.2.2.2 Section Ricciella: plants terricolous or aquatic;
thalli not in rosettes; branches linear, strap-shaped or ‘ rib-
bon -1 i ke ; not cavernous; scales ventral, one-ranked.
R. stricta, R. purpurascens. Sporangia bulging con-
spicuously ventrally.
32.2.3 Subgenus Leptoriccia : R. membranacea. Thalli thin
and flat, ventral tissue vestigial; scales reduced or absent;
spores spherical, small, ornamented with fine spinules.
32.2.4 Subgenus Thallocarpus: thalli in complete or incom-
plete rosettes; heterothallic; spores remaining in tetrads.
R. curtisii. Spores joined together by narrow band or
ridge into tetrahedral tetrads; ornamentation with slender
spicules up to 5 pm long.
228
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
R. perssonii. Spores joined by wide band into rhom-
boidal tetrads; ornamentation with stout spines 10-15 pm
long.
32.2.5 Subgenus Chartacea: R. schelpei. Dorsal epidermis
with thick-walled cells, lacking chlorophyll; air pores sur-
rounded by superimposed ring of smaller, thin-walled cells;
thallus narrowly grooved; acutely winged; scales rounded,
persistent, large, reaching thallus margins; spores single.
32.2.6 Subgenus Pannosae: R. tomentosa. Dorsal epider-
mis with cellular outgrowths of very tall, hair-like out-
growths; air pores surrounded by radially arranged
wedge-shaped cells; thallus broadly grooved; obtusely
winged; scales triangular, persistent, large, filamentous
apices extending beyond thallus margins; spores remain-
ing in globular tetrads.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I wish to express my sincere thanks and appreciation
to Mrs J. Mulvenna for her patience and skill in typing
this manuscript in several different drafts and to Dr O.A.
Leistner, editor of Bothalia , for his kind advice and help.
REFERENCES
ARNELL, S.W. 1956. Illustrated Moss Flora of Fennoscandia. 1. Hepa-
ticae. Lund.
ARNELL, S.W. 1957. Hepaticae collected in South West Africa by Prof.
Dr O.H. Volk. Mitteilungen der Botanischen Staatssammlung
Mtinchen 16: 262-272.
ARNELL, S.W. 1963. Hepaticae of South Africa. Swedish Natural Sci-
ence Council, Stockholm.
AUSTIN, C.F. 1869. Characters of some new Hepaticae (mostly North
American) together with notes on a few imperfectly described
species. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences Phila-
delphia 21: 218-234.
CAMPBELL. E.O. 1975. Notes on the liverwort family Ricciaceae in
New Zealand. TtMara 21: 121-129.
CAMPBELL, E.O. 1977. Further notes on the liverwort family Ric-
ciaceae in New Zealand. Tuatara 22: 222-232.
DAMSHOLT, K. & HALLINGBACK, T. 1986. Slaktet Riccia
(rosettmossor) i Fennoskandia. Svensk botanisk Tidskrift 80:
245-270.
DUTHIE, A.V. & GARS1DE, S. 1937. Studies in South African Ric-
ciaceae 1 . Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 24:
93-133.
DUTHIE, A.V. & GARSIDE, S. 1939. Studies in South African Ric-
ciaceae II. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 27:
17-28.
FISCHER, Eb. 1993. Taxonomic results of the BRYOTROP Expedition
to Zaire and Rwanda. 8. Riccia vulcanicola Eb. Fischer (subgenus
Ricciella, section Cavemosae), a new species from the Virunga
Volcanoes, Rwanda. Tropical Bryology 8: 69-74.
FRYE, T.C. & CLARK, L. 1937-1947. Hepaticae of North America.
University of Washington Publications in Biology 6: 1-162.
GARSIDE, S. 1958. Studies in South African Ricciaceae. III. A new
species of Oxymitra. Journal of South African Botany 24: 83-87.
GROLLE, R. 1976. Vcrzeichnis der Lebermoose Europas und benachbar-
ter Gebiete. Feddes Repertorium 87: 171-279.
GROLLE, R. 1983. Nomina Generica Hepaticarum. references, types and
synonymies. Acta botanica Fennica 121: 1-62.
HASSEL DE MENENDEZ, G.G. 1963. Esludio de las Anthocerotales y
Marchantiales de la Argentina. Opera Lilloana 7: 1-297.
HASSEL DE MENENDEZ, G.G. 1976. Taxonomic problems and pro-
gress in the study of the Hepaticae. Journal of the Hattori Botani-
cal Laboratory 41:1 9-36.
JONES, E.W. 1957. African Hepatics XIII. The Ricciaceae in Tropical
Africa. Transactions of the British Bryological Society 3:
208-227.
JOVET-AST. S. 1964. Riccia crystallina L. emend. Raddi et Riccia
cavernosa Hoffm. emend. Raddi (Note preliminaire). Revue bry-
ologique et lichenologique 33: 459—483.
JOVET-AST, S. 1966. Riccia crystallina L. emend. Raddi et Riccia
cavernosa Hoffm. emend. Raddi II. Revue bryologique et
lichenologique 34: 82-90.
JOVET-AST, S. 1975. Precisions sur les caracteres de deux Riccia du
sous-genre Thallocarpus. Revue bryologique et lichenologique
41:449-456.
JOVET-AST, S. 1983. Riccia trichocarpa Howe et Riccia canescens
Steph. Cryptogamie Bryologie Lichenologie 4: 37-46.
JOVET-AST, S. 1984. Riccia (subg. Viridisquamata ) ca roliniana Na-
Thalang, espece endemique relictuelle d'Australie. Cryptogamie
Bryologie Lichenologie 5: 389-402.
JOVET-AST, S. 1986. La Riccia de la Region Mediterraneenne. Cryp-
togamie Bryologie Lichenologie. 7: 1 82-43 1 .
JOVET-AST. S. 1991. Riccia (Hepatiques, Marchantiales) d’Amerique
Latine. Taxons du sous-genre Riccia. Ciyptogamie Bryologie
Lichenologie 12: 189-370.
JOVET-AST, S. 1993. Riccia (Hepatiques, Marchantiales) d’Amerique
Latine. Taxons des sous-genres Thallocarpus, Leptoriccia, Ric-
ciella. Ciyptogamie Biyologie Lichenologie 14: 219-301.
JOVET-AST, S. 1994. Le traitment des Riccia d' Amerique du Nord scion
R.M. Schuster. Ciyptogamie Biyologie Lichenologie 15: 81-86.
LINDBERG. S.O. 1874. Manipulus Muscorum Secundus. Notiser Sdll-
skap Fauna et Flora Fennica Forhandlingar 13: 353—418.
MEIJER, W. 1951. Inleiding tot de Nederlandse Levermossen. II. Bij-
drage tot de kennis van het geslacht Riccia in Nederland. Neder-
lands Kruidkundig Archief 58: 121-140.
MULLER K. 1 940. Beitrage zur Systematik der Lebermoose. Hedwigia
79: 72-80.
MULLER, K. 1951-1958. Die Lebermoose Europas. Dr L. Rabenhorst's
Kryptogainen-Flora 6: 416—471.
NA-THALANG, O. 1980. A revision of the genus Riccia (Hepaticae) in
Australia. Brunonia 3: 61-140.
PANDE, S.K. & UDAR, R. 1958. Genus Riccia in India II. Species of
Riccia from South India with description of a new species and
notes on the synonymy of some recently described ones. Proceed-
ings of the National Institute for Science of India: 24: 79-88.
PEROLD, S.M. 1986a. Pteroriccia R.M. Schust., should it be upheld?
(Ricciaceae). Bothalia 16: 63, 64.
PEROLD, S.M. 1986b. Studies in the genus Riccia (Marchantiales) from
southern Africa. 7. R. congoana and its synonyms. Bothalia 16:
193-201.
PEROLD, S.M. 1989. Studies in the genus Riccia (Marchantiales) from
southern Africa. 12. R. albolimbata and the status of R. al-
bosquamata , white-scaled species originally described by Amell.
Bothalia 19: 17-25.
PEROLD, S.M. 1991a. A taxonomic revision of the Ricciaceae Reichenb.
(Marchantiales: Hepaticae) in southern Africa. Ph.D. thesis. Uni-
versity of Pretoria.
PEROLD, S.M. 1991b. Two new species of Riccia L. from tropical
Africa: R. somaliensis and R. erubescens. Journal ofBiyology 16:
367-377.
PEROLD, S.M. 1991c. Studies in the genus Riccia (Marchantiales) from
southern Africa. 23. R. bullosa: typification and a full description.
Bothalia 21: 129-135.
PEROLD, S.M. 1992. Lectotypification of Riccia crystallina (Ric-
ciaceae). Bothalia 22: 185-187.
PEROLD, S.M. 1993. Taxonomic results of the BRYOTROP Expedition
to Zaire and Rwanda. 7. Ricciaceae. Tropical Biyology 8: 55-68.
PEROLD, S.M. 1995. A survey of the Ricciaceae of tropical Africa.
Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica 40: 53-91.
PEROLD, S.M. & VOLK, O.H. 1988a. Studies in the genus Riccia
(Marchantiales) from southern Africa. 8. R. campbelliana (subge-
nus Riccia), newly recorded for the region. Bothalia 18: 37—42.
PEROLD, S.M. & VOLK, O.H. 1988b. Studies in the genus Riccia
(Marchantiales) from southern Africa. 9. R. nigrella and the status
of R. capensis. Bothalia 18: 43—49.
RAY, J. 1696. Synopsis methodica stirpium brittanicarum , edn 2: 41.
SCHUSTER, R.M. 1949. The ecology and distribution of Hepaticae in
central and western New York. The American Midland Naturalist
42: 628-630.
SCHUSTER. R.M. 1953. Boreal Hepaticae, a manual of the liverworts of
Minnesota and adjacent regions. The American Midland Natural-
ist 49: 257-684.
SCHUSTER, R.M. 1984. Diagnoses of some new taxa of Hepaticae.
Pliytologia 56: 65-74.
SCHUSTER, R.M. 1985. Some new taxa of Hepaticae. Pliytologia 57:
408-414.
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
229
SCHUSTER, R.M. 1992a. Studies on Marchantiales, I— III. Journal of the
Hattori Botanical Laboratory 71: 267-2 87.
SCHUSTER, R.M. 1992b. The hepaticae and anthocerotae of North
America Vol. 6. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago.
SCOTT, G.A.M. 1985. Southern Australian liverworts. Australian Flora
and Fauna, Ser. 2.
SEPPELT, R.D. 1983. The status of Riccia areolata and R. longiciliata,
two recently described species. Lindbergia 9: 117-120.
SERGIO, C. 1991. Riccia macrocarpa Levier na Peninsula Iberica e
Macaronesia. Estudio taxonomico, corologico e sue interesse fito-
geografico. Actes del simposi International de Botdnica Pius
Font i Quer, 1988 Vol. 1. Criptogamia : 263-270.
SMITH, A.J.E. 1990. The liverworts of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge
University Press.
STEPHANI, F. 1898. Species hepaticarum. Bulletin de T Herbier Boissier
6: 309^111.
THAITHONG. O. 1982. Fine structure of spore wall in fourteen species
of Riccia. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 53:
133-146.
VANDEN BERGHEN, C. 1972. Hepatiques et Anthocerotees. Resultats
scientifiques de V exploration hydrobiologique du Bassin Lac
Bangwelo & Luapula 8: 1-202.
VAN MELICK, H. 1991. De Nederlandse Riccia’s (Land- en Water-
vorkjes). Wetenschappelijke Mededeling KNNV 203. Utrecht.
VOLK, O.H. 1981. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Lebermoose (Hepaticae)
aus Siidwestafrika (Namibia). II. Mitteilungen der Botanischen
Staatssammlung. Miinchen 17: 245-252.
VOLK, O.H. 1983. Vorschlag fur eine Neugliederung der Gattung Riccia
L. Mitteilungen der Botanischen Staatssammlung, Miinchen 19:
453^165.
VOLK, O.H. & PEROLD, S.M. 1986a. Studies in the genus Riccia
(Marchantiales) from southern Africa. 3. R. schelpei, a new spe-
cies in the new subgenus Chartaceae. Bothalia 16: 29-33.
VOLK, O.H. & PEROLD, S.M. 1986b. Studies in the genus Riccia
(Marchantiales) from southern Africa. 6. R. hirsuta, a new species
in a new section. Bothalia 16: 187-191.
VOLK, O.H. & PEROLD. S.M. 1990. Studies in the genus Riccia (Mar-
chantiales) from southern Africa. 15. R. hirsuta and R. tomentosa,
two distinct species previously treated as one. Bothalia 20: 22-29.
INDEX TO TAXA
Albidae, subsection, 224
Albosquamatae, section, 225
Aquaticae-Terrestriae group, 218
Atromarginatae, section, 225
Bicarinatae, section, 225
Bifurca group, 214
Cavemosae, section, 225, 226
Chaetoriccia, section, 226
Chartacea, subgenus, 220, 223, 226, 228
Ciliata(e) group, 214, 218, 223, 227
Ciliatae, section, 225
Ciliiferae, section. 225
Ciliifera group, 214
Crozalsii. subgroup, 218
Cryptocarpus Austin, 217
Crystallina group, 223, 227
Crystallina, subgroup, 218
Cupuliferae group, 227
Euriccia, section, 212
Euriccia, subgenus, 213-216, 219
Frostii, section, 225
Glauca group, 214
group Aquaticae-Terrestriae, 218
group Bifurca, 214
group Ciliata(e), 214, 218, 223, 227
group Ciliifera, 214
group Crystallina, 223, 227
group Cupuliferae, 227
group Glauca, 214
group Inermes, 223
group Intermediatae, 227
group Laevigatae, 218
group Lamellosa, 214
group Mammillatae, 227
group Nigrella, 214
group Papillatae, 223
group Papillosa, 214
group Sorocarpa, 214
group Squamatae, 218, 223, 227
group Terre striae, 218
group Vesiculosa, 223, 225, 227
Hemiseuma, section, 212
Hirtae, section, 213
Inermes group, 223
Intermediatae group, 227
Laevigatae group, 218
Lamellosae, section, 224
Lamellosa group, 214
Leptoriccia, subgenus, 212, 219, 220, 223, 225, 227
Lichenoides, subgenus, 212
Limbata, subgroup, 218
Longiciliata, subgroup, 218
Macrospora, subgroup, 218
Mammillatae group, 227
Micantes, section, 220
Micantes, subgenus, 226
Nigrella group, 214
Oxymitra Bisch., 212, 213
androgyna Howe, 213
cristata Garside, 213
Oxymitraceae Miill.Frib., 213, 216
Pannosae, section, 221, 223, 226
Pannosae, subgenus, 223, 226, 228
Papillatae group, 223
Papillosae, section, 213
Papillosa group, 214
Papulosa, subgroup. 218
Pilifer, section, 217, 219-221, 223, 226, 227
Pteroriccia R.M. Schust., 219
Pteroriccia, subgenus, 219, 220, 223, 226
Riccia, section, 218-221, 223, 224, 227
Riccia, subgenus, 212, 216-224, 227
Riccia, subsection, 224
Ricciaceae Rchb., 211-217, 219. 222, 227
Riccia L„ 211-224, 226, 227
alatospora O.H. Volk & Perold , 227
albida Sull., 212, 218, 220, 223, 224
albolimbata S. W. Amell, 216, 217, 224, 225, 227
albomarginata Bisch., 215-217, 219, 227
alboporosa Perold, 227
albopunctata Ast, 223
albomata O.H. Volk & Perold, 227
albosquamata S.W. Amell, 216, 217, 225
albovestita O.H. Volk, 219, 227
ampullacea Perold, 227
andina Miill.Frib., 216, 224
subsp. andina, 224
subsp. chionophora R.M. Schust., 224
angolensis Steph., 215-217, 219, 227
areolata Na-Thalang, 218
argenteolimbata O.H. Volk & Perold, 225, 227
arvensis Austin, 213
asprella Carrington & Pearson, 218, 220
atrorfiarginata Levier, 213, 221
forma atromarginata, 225
var. atromarginata, 223
forma glabra Levier ex Miill.Frib., 225
var. glabra Levier ex Miill.Frib., 214
atropurpurea Sim, 215, 216, 227
austinii Steph., 212, 213, 216
australis Steph., 223
bahiensis Steph., 224
berriei E.W. Jones, 215
beyrichiana Hampe ex Lehm, 212-215, 221, 222, 224.
230
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
bialbistrata Hassel , 216
bicarinata Lindb., 214, 221, 225
bicolorata Perold , 227
bifurca Hoffin. , 212-215, 217, 218, 220-222, 224
billardieri Mont. & Nees, 215, 218
blackii Na-Thalcmg , 218
boliviensis Ast , 223
brasiliensis Schiffil., 223
breidleri 7«r., 214
breutelii Hampe ex Steph , 223.
brittonii Howe, 223
bullosa Lmk c.r Lindenb., 216, 217, 225, 227
califomica Austin, 212, 224
campbelliana Howe, 212, 216, 223, 227
subsp. austrigena R.M. Schust., 216, 224
subsp. campbelliana, 224
canaliculate Hoffin., 213-215, 219, 221, 222, 225
canescens Steph., 214, 216, 225
capensis Steph., 216, 217
caroliniana Na-Thalang, 218, 219, 226
cartilaginosa Steph., 220
cavernosa Hoffin. emend. Raddi, 212-223, 225, 227
chiapasensis Ast, 224
chrystallina, 217
ciliata Hoffin., 214, 215, 217, 221, 225
subsp. canescens (Steph.) R.M. Schust., 225
subsp. ciliata, 225
subsp. grisea R.M. Schust., 225
subsp. trichocarpa (Howe) R.M. Schust., 225
var. epilosa Wamst., 214, 221
var. intumescens Bisch., 214
var. violacea Kny, 214
cili(i)fera Link, 214, 215, 221, 225
collate Na-Thalang, 218
compacta Garside, 212, 216, 223
concava Bisch., 216, 217, 219, 227
congoana Steph., 215, 217, 227
coronata Sim, 216, 217
crassa Steph., 218
crassifrons Spruce, 224
crinita Taylor, 218, 220, 225
crozalsii Levier, 214-218, 220-222, 227
cruciate, 215
crustata Trab., 221, 224.
crystallina L., 212-223, 225-227
var. angustior Nees, 214, 215
cubensis S. W. Amell, 223
cupulifera A. V. Duthie, 212, 216, 227
curlisii (James ex Austin ) Austin, 212, 216, 217, 219, 223, 226, 227
dalslandica S.W. Amell, 215, 221
deserticola Steph., 218
dictyospora Howe, 212, 213, 224
discolor Lehm. & Lindenb., 215, 217, 218, 227
donnellii Austin, 212
dorsiverrucosa Hassel, 216, 224
duplex Lorb., 213-215, 218, 220-222, 225
dussiana Steph., 224
ekmanii S.W. Amell, 223
eldeeniae Jacobs, 213
elliottii Steph., 223
elongata Perold, 227
enyae Ast, 223
erinacea Schiffn., 225
erubescens Perold, 227
erythrocarpa Ast, 223
fluitens L., 212-217, 219, 221, 222, 225
frostii Austin, 212-216, 221, 224, 225, 227
1'ruchartii Steph., 216, 223
furfuracea Perold, 227
gangetica S. Ahmad, 215, 218
garsidci Sim, 216, 227
geissleriana Ast, 224
glauca L„ 212, 213, 215-217, 219, 221, 222, 224
var. subinermis (Lindb.) Wamst., 214
forma colorata S.W Amell, 221
gothica Damsh. & Hallingb., 221
gougetiana Mont., 214, 221, 225
var. erinacea Schiffit., 214
var. armatissima Levier ex Mull.Frib., 225
grandis Nees, 223
hantamensis Perold, 227
hegewaldiana Ast, 224
hirsute O.H. Volk & Perold, 220, 221, 226, 227
hirta (Austin) Underw., 212, 213, 224
horrida Ast, 223
howei R.M. Schust., 226
howellii Howe, 223
huebeneriana Lindenb., 214, 215, 221, 222, 227
subsp. huebeneriana, 225
subsp. sullivantii (Austin) R.M. Schust., 225
ianthina Ast, 223
intermedia E.W. Jones, 215, 217
iodocheila Howe, 216, 223
jovet-astiae Vtanna emend. Vianna, 224
junghuhniana Nees <& Lindenb., 218
lamellosa Raddi, 214, 218, 220, 221, 223
subsp. austini R.M. Schust, 224
subsp. lamellosa, 224
lanceolate Steph., 215, 227
leptothallus R.M. Schust., 226
ligula Steph., 214, 221
limbata Bisch., 215-220, 227
limicola Ast, 224
lindmanii Steph., 216, 223
longiciliata Na-Thalang, 218
luticola Na-Thalang, 218
macallisteri Howe, 212, 213, 224
macrocarpa Levier, 214, 221, 227
macrospora Steph., 218
mammifera O.H. Volk & Perold, 227
marginata Carrington & Pearson, 218
mauryana Steph., 216, 223, 224
melanospora Kashyap, 215
melilensis C. Massal., 214, 221, 225
membranacea Gottsche & Lindenb., 212, 215-217, 219, 223, 225, 227
michelii Raddi, 214, 221
microciliata O.H. Volk & Perold, 221
moenkemeyeri Steph., 215, 217, 227
montaguensis S.W. Amell, 216, 217
montana Perold, 227
multifida Steph., 218, 220
muscicola Steph., 218
natalensis Sim, 216, 227
nigerica E.W. Jones, 215, 227
nigrella DC., 212, 214, 217, 218, 220-224, 227
nigrosquamata E.W. Jones, 215
oelandica C.E.O. Jensen, 214
okahandjana S.W Arnell, 216, 227
olgensis Na-Thalang, 218
ozarkiana McGregor, 224
papillispora Steph., 215
papillosa Moris, 214, 221
papulosa Steph., 218, 220
paraguayensis Spruce, 216, 224
paranaensis Hassel, 216, 224, 225
parvo-areolata O.H. Volk & Perold, 226, 227
perennis Steph., 221, 225
perssonii S.A. Kahn, 216, 217, 219, 223, 228
plana Taylor, 212, 215-217, 225
plano-biconvexa Steph., 216, 223
pottsiana Sim, 216, 227
pseudolimbata S.W. Amell, 217
pulveracea Perold, 227
purpurascens Lehm., 216, 227
Bothalia 25,2 ( 1995)
231
radicosa Pearson , 215, 227
rautanenii Steph., 212, 215, 216
rhenana Lorb., 213-215, 222, 225
rhodesiae S.W. Amell, 215-217
ridleyi A. Gepp. 223
rorida Na-Thalang , 218, 220
rosea O.H. Volk & Perold, 227
rubricollis Garside & A.V. Duthie ined., 216
rubricollis Garside & A.V. Duthie ex Perold , 227
runssorensis Steph., 215, 216, 227
saharensis Steph. ex Ast, 227
sanguineisporis Ast, 223
schelpei O.H. Volk. & Perold, 220, 223, 226, 228
setigera R.M. Schust., 224
simii Perold, 227
somaliensis Perold, 227
sommieri Levier, 214, 221, 225
sorocarpa Bisch., 212-224, 227
subsp. arctica R.M. Schust., 224
subsp. erythrophora R.M. Schust, 224.
subsp. sorocarpa, 224
var. heegii Schiffn., 214
spongiosula Na-Thalang, 218, 220
spongosa S.W. Amell, 216
squamata Nees, 216, 223
stenophylla Spruce, 216, 224, 225
stricta A.V. Duthie ined., 216, 219
stricta (Lindenb. ) Perold, 217, 227
subbifurca Wamst. ex Crozals, 213-215, 221, 222
subdepilata Ast, 223
subplana Steph., 223
sullivantii Austin, 212, 213
symoensii Vanden Berghen, 217, 227
taeniaeforrnis Ast, 223
tenella Jacobs, 224
tomentosa O.H. Volk & Perold, 221, 226, 228
trabutiana Steph., 214, 221
trachyglossum Perold, 227
trichocarpa Howe, 212, 213, 215, 216. 221, 223, 225. 227
tuberculata Pande & Udar, 215
vesiculosa (Carrington & Pearson) Steph., 217, 218, 220
viannae Ast, 223
villosa Steph., 216, 217, 219, 226, 227
violacea Howe
var. iodocheila (Howe) R.M. Schust., 225
var. laevis Ast (1991), 223
var. laevis R.M. Schust. (1992), 225
var. violacea, 223, 225
vitalii Ast, 223
vitrea Perold, 227
volkii S.W. Amell, 216, 219, 227
vulcanicola Eb. Fisch., 226, 227
wainionis Steph., 223
wamstorfii Limpr. ex Wamst., 213-216, 221, 222, 224
zachariae Lorb., 214
Ricciella, section, 212, 217, 219-222, 224, 225, 227
Ricciella, subgenus, 212-218, 220-223, 225, 227
Ricciineae, suborder, 213, 214, 216
Ricciocarpos Corda, 211, 212, 217, 227
natans (L) Corda, 217, 227
Ricciocarpus Corda (orth. var.), 212-217, 219, 221. 226
natans (L) Corda, 212-217, 221, 226
section Albosquamatae R.M. Schust. (discarded by Schust.), 225
section Atromarginatae R.M. Schust., 225
section Bicarinatae R.M. Schust., 225
section Cavemosae R.M. Schust., 225, 226
section Chaetoriccia R.M. Schust., 226
section Ciliatae R.M. Schust., 225
section Ciliiferae R.M. Schust., 225
section Euriccia, 212
section Frostii R.M. Schust., 225
section Hemiseuma Bisch., 212
section Hirtae, 213
section Lamellosae R.M. Schust., 224
section Micantes O.H. Volk & Perold, 220
section Pannosae Perold, 221, 223, 226
section Papillosae, 213
section Pilifer O.H. Volk, 217, 219-221, 223, 226, 227
section Riccia, 218-221, 223, 224, 227
section Ricciella (A. Br.) Rchb., 212, 217, 219-222, 224, 225, 227
section Sommieri R.M. Schust., 224
section Sorocarpae R.M. Schust., 224
section Spongodes Nees. 212, 217, 219-223, 225-227
section Thallocarpus R.M. Schust., 219, 226
section Viridisquamata Na-Thalang, 218, 219
Sommieri, section, 224
Sorocarpae, section, 224
Sorocarpa group, 214
Sorocarpa, subgroup, 218
Spongodes, section, 212, 217, 219-223, 225-227
Spongodes, subgenus, 219, 220
Squamatae group, 218, 223, 227
subgenus Chartacea Perold, 220, 223, 226, 228
subgenus Euriccia Lindb. ex Lacouture, 213-216, 219
subgenus Leptoriccia R.M. Schust., 212, 219, 220, 223, 225, 227
subgenus Lichenoides (Bisch.) Lindl., 212
subgenus Micantes O.H. Volk & Perold, 226
subgenus Pannosae (Perold) Perold, 223, 226, 228
subgenus Pteroriccia (R.M. Schust.) R.M. Schust., 219, 220, 223, 226
subgenus Riccia, 212, 216-224, 227
subgenus Ricciella (A. Braun) Boulay, 212-218, 220-223, 225, 227
subgenus Spongodes (Nees) O.H. Volk, 219, 220
subgenus Thallocarpus (Lindb.) Ast, 212, 217, 220, 221, 223, 226, 227
subgenus Viridisquamata (Na-Thalang) Ast, 219, 220, 223, 226
subgroup Crozalsii, 218
subgroup Crystallina, 218
subgroup Limbata, 218
subgroup Longiciliata, 218
subgroup Macrospora, 218
subgroup Papulosa, 218
subgroup Sorocarpa, 218
subgroup Vesiculosa, 218
suborder Ricciineae H. Buch, 213, 214, 216
subsection Albidae R.M. Schust., 224
subsection Riccia, 224
Terrestriae group, 218
Thallocarpus Lindb., 217
Thallocarpus, section, 219, 226
Thallocarpus, subgenus, 212, 217, 220, 221, 223, 226, 227
Vesiculosa group, 223, 225, 227
Vesiculosa, subgroup, 218
Viridisquamata. section, 218, 219
Viridisquamata, subgenus. 219, 220, 223, 226
Bothalia 25,2: 233-245 (1995)
Notes on African plants
VARIOUS AUTHORS
BORAGINACEAE
TYPIFICATION OF THE SECTIONS IN LOBOSTEMON
Levyns (1934) subdivided Lobostemon Lehm. into five
sections without typifying them. According to Art. 10.1
of the ICBN (Greuter et al. 1994), any subdivision of a
genus must be typified. For purposes of designation or
citation of a type, the species name alone suffices. Fur-
thermore, Art. 10. 2 of the ICBN (Greuter et al. 1994)
states that if no type of a previously or simultaneously
published species name was included in the protologue of
the subdivision, a type must be otherwise chosen.
Lobostemon Lehm. is typified by L. echioides Lehm.
This species is placed in Levyns’ (1934) section
Echioides. Art. 22.1 of the ICBN (Greuter et al. 1994)
stipulates that the name of any subdivision of a genus that
includes the type of the adopted, legitimate name of the
genus to which it is assigned is to repeat that generic
name unaltered as its epithet.
Therefore, Levyns’ (1934) Lobostemon section Echioides
should be Lobostemon section Lobostemon , typified by L.
echioides Lehm.; Lobostemon section Argentei Levyns should
be typified by L. argenteus (Berg.) Buek.; Lobostemon section
Trichotomi Levyns by L. trichotomus (Thunb.) DC.; and Lo-
bostemon section Emticosi Levyns by Lfrnticosus (L.) Buek.
Buys & Van der Walt (1994) established L regulareflonis
(Ker Gawl.) M.H. Buys as the correct name for L grandiflorus
(Andr.) Levyns; therefore Lobostemon section Grandifbri
Levyns is typified by L. regulareflorus (Ker Gawl.) M.H. Buys.
REFERENCES
BUYS, M.H. & VAN DER WALT J.J.A. 1994. Lobostemon regulare-
florus— the correct name for L. grandiflorus (Boraginaceae).
Bothalia 24: 170.
GREUTER, W„ BARRIE. F.R., BURDET, H.M., CHALONER. W.G..
DEMOULIN, V., HAWKSWORTH, D.L., JORGENSON. P.M.,
NICOLSON, D.H., SILVA, P.C., TREHANE, P. & McNEILL, J.
1994. International code of botanical nomenclature adopted by
the Fifteenth International Botanical Congress, Yokohama, Au-
gust-September 1993. Regnum vegetabile 131.
LEVYNS, M.R. 1 934. A revision of Lobostemon. Journal of the Linnean
Society 49: 393-451.
M.H. BUYS* and J.J.A. VAN DER WALT*
f Department of Botany, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X5018,
Stellenbosch 7599.
MS. received: 1995-01-23.
PODOCARPACEAE
NOTES ON PODOCARPUS IN SOUTHERN AFRICA AND MADAGASCAR
In a recent reconsideration of the taxonomic status of
various genera of Coniferae in the Podocarpaceae, Page
( 1988) elevated Podocarpus sect. Afrocatpus J. Buchholz
& N.E. Gray to generic rank. Following the interpretation
of Page (1988), Afrocatpus (J. Buchholz & N.E. Gray)
C.N. Page is a small genus discontinuously distributed
from equatorial Africa (Zaire, Ethiopia and Uganda)
southward to south and southeast Africa and the Cape
Province of South Africa. This group of tall, evergreen
trees has been variously included at sectional level in
the genera Decussocarpus de Laub. and Nageia Gaertn.
by de Laubenfels (1969, 1987). Of the species of Po-
docarpus L' Her. ex Pers. transferred to Afrocarpus by
Page (1988) only one, A. falcatus (Thunb.) C.N. Page,
the national tree of South Africa, occurs in southern
Africa (Figure 1 ). The other species of Afrocarpus have
a more northerly distribution. P. iatifolius (Thunb.) R. Br.
ex Mirb.. P. elongatus (Aiton) L’Her. ex Pers. and P.
henkelii Stapf ex Dallim. & A.B. Jacks, were retained in
Podocarpus.
In this contribution the infrageneric taxonomy of Af-
rican and Madagascan Podocarpus is discussed with spe-
cial reference to the new genus Afrocarpus. It is argued
that the reproductive morphological variability encoun-
tered in Podocarpus could best be accommodated at in-
frageneric level and that little purpose would be served
by elevating Podocarpus sect. Afrocatpus to generic rank
(Leistner 1966, 1988, 1991; Von Breitenbach 1991).
TAXONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS
Podocarpus L’Her. ex Pers. sens. lot. is represented
in Africa and Madagascar by three groups of species
which can be briefly characterized as follows:
Group 1 (section Podocarpus sensu de Laub. 1985)
Female cones with 1 or 2 fertile scales fused with the
cone axis to form a swollen, fleshy, often brightly col-
oured receptacle or podocarpium when mature. This re-
ceptacle is borne on a thin, naked stalk (Figure 2 A, B).
The leaves are mostly hypostonratic and have 3 or 5 resin
canals. Representatives: P. Iatifolius (Thunb.) R. Br. ex
Mirb. (synonym: P. milanjianus Rendle), P. elongatus (Ai-
ton) L’Her. ex Pers.
234
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
Group 2 (section Scytopodium de Laub. 1985)
Female cones with 1 fertile scale fused with the cone
axis to form a clavate, glaucous, leathery receptacle not
always clearly demarcated from its short, stout, naked
stalk (Figure 2C). Leaves always hypostomatic and with
5 resin canals. Representatives: P. henkelii Stapf ex Dal-
lim. & A.B. Jacks, (synonym: P. ensiculas Melville), P.
madagascariensis Baker.
Group 3 (section Afrocarpus J. Buchholz & N.E. Gray 1948)
Female cones with I fertile scale fused with the cone
axis into a very slightly swollen woody receptacle at the
apex of a stout, scaly to leafy stalk (Figure 2D). The
leaves are amphistomatic and have only 1 resin canal.
Representatives: P. falcatus (Thunb.) R. Br. ex Mirb.
(synonyms: P. gracilior Pilg., P. gracillimus Pi lg. . P.
gaussenii Woltz), P. mannii Hook. f. (synonyms: P. usam-
barensis Pilg., P dawei Stapf).
A comparison of the listed characters shows that there
are few differences between groups 1 and 2 but that group
3 differs in several characters from both 1 and 2.
How should the differences between the three groups
be reflected in a taxonomic system? We consider the dif-
ferences between groups 1 and 2 to be satisfactorily re-
flected by placing them in separate sections of the same
genus. We therefore accept the scheme proposed by de
Laubenfels (1985) who retained groups 1 and 2 in Podo-
carpus and placed group I in section Podocarpus and
group 2 in section Scytocarpus de Laub. Page (1988,
1990) does not take account of group 2. In his key to the
genera of Podocarpaceae (Page 1990) group 2 runs to
Afrocarpus (J. Buchholz & N.E. Gray) C.N. Page but it
does not match his description of that genus. It does, how-
ever, fit his description of Podocarpus except for the re-
ceptacle of the female cone which he describes as
conspicuous, multiscaled and becoming swollen and
fleshy and often highly coloured at maturity.
Although the differences between groups 1 and 2 on
the one hand and group 3 on the other are considered
more basic than those between groups 1 and 2, these dif-
ferences are regarded as insufficient for separating them
at either subgenus or genus level. As Page (1988) points
out, botanists principally concerned with African trees or
vegetation, such as Lind & Morrison (1974), Coates Pal-
grave (1977) and Hilliard (1985) have not recognized the
HGURE 1. — Distinctive growth form of Po-
docarpus falcatus. The Big Tree near
Knysna, southern Cape, as it appeared
in 1938. Photo: N. Glen.
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
235
FIGURE 2. — Podocarpus, portion of
branch with seed. A, B, show-
ing collapsed but distinctly
swollen receptacle (arrowed).
A, P. latifolius, H. P. van der
Schijff 5446 (PRE), collected
in December 1 960 at Nqanduli
near Kofftebaai in the Trans-
kei; B, P.elongatus , fresh ma-
terial collected in Kirsten-
bosch National Botanical Gar-
den; C, P. henkelii , showing
clavate leathery receptacle (ar-
rowed); D. P. falcatus, show-
ing woody receptacle at apex
of stout, scaly stalk. C, D, fresh
material collected in Pretoria
National Botanical Garden.
Scale bars: 7.5 mm.
splitting off of group 3 from Podocarpus. One reason for
this attitude. Page (1988) speculates, may be the similarity
in general tree form and vegetative appearance of the Af-
rican members of Podocarpus sens. lat. He also mentions
that the species of his genus Afrocarpus (group 3) are in
some respects intermediate in taxonomic position between
the African members of Podocarpus sens. str. and certain
Asian genera. Group 2 (section Scytopodium ) which ex-
tends the circumscription of Podocarpus beyond the de-
scription given by Page (1990), further narrows the gap
between group 3 on the one hand and groups 1 and 2 on
the other, at least in respect of the female cones.
This note is based on a very limited number of char-
acters. However, until a thorough investigation into ge-
neric relationships within the Podocarpaceae shows that
our conclusions are not acceptable, we support the view
that group 3 is still best accommodated as a section within
Podocarpus.
The correct name of South Africa's national tree remains,
therefore. Podocarpus falcatus Thunb. (Eng. Outeniqua Yel-
lowwood, Afr. Outeniekwageelhout; National List of In-
digenous Trees No. 16; Von Breitenbach 1990).
Finally, mention should be made of the fact that Page
(1988) has assigned the incorrect gender to Afivcarpus
when making the combination of the type species, A. fal-
cata (Thunb.) C.N. Page. He has given the specific epithet
a feminine ending in spite of Article 62.2, Example 2 of
the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Greu-
ter et al. 1994) which states quite clearly that ‘all modern
generic compounds ending in the Greek masculine -carpos
(or -carpus) are masculine'. Under Afrocarpus the specific
epithet should therefore be falcatus.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank Drs Donald J.B. Killick and
John P. Rourke for various comments and many sugges-
tions for beneficial changes to an earlier draft of the text.
236
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
REFERENCES
BUCHHOLZ, J.T. & GRAY, N.E. 1948. A taxonomic revision of Podo-
carpus. I. The sections of the genus and their subdivisions, with
special reference to leaf anatomy. Journal of the Arnold Arbore-
tum 29: 49-63.
COATES PALGRAVE, K. 1977. Trees of southern Africa. Struik, Cape
Town.
DE LAUBENFELS. D.J. 1969. A revision of the Malesian and Pacific
rainforest conifers, I. Podocarpaceae, in part. Journal of the Ar-
nold Arboretum 50: 49-63.
DE LAUBENFELS. D.J. 1985. A taxonomic revision of the genus Podo-
carpus. Blumea 30: 251-278.
DE LAUBENFELS, D.J. 1987. Revision of the genus Nageia (Podocar-
paceae). Blumea 32: 209-2 1 1 .
GREUTER, W. et al. 1994. International Code of Botanical Nomencla-
ture. Regnum Vegetabile 131.
HILLIARD, O.M. 1985. Trees and shrubs of the Natal Drakensberg.
University of Natal Press, Pietermaritzburg.
LEISTNER, O.A. 1966. Podocarpaceae. Flora of southern Africa 1:
34-41.
LEISTNER, O.A. 1988. Podocarpus latifolius. The Flowering Plants of
Africa 50: t. 1965.
LEISTNER, O.A. 1991. Podocarpus fidcatus. The Flowering Plants of
Africa 5 1 : t. 2021.
LIND, E.M. & MORRISON, M.E.S. 1974. East African vegetation.
London.
MOLL, E.J. 1981. Trees of Natal. Eco-lab Trust Fund, Cape Town.
PAGE, C.N.1988. New and maintained genera in the conifer families
Podocarpaceae and Pinaceae. Notes of the Royal Botanic Garden
Edinburgh 45: 377-395.
PAGE, C.N. 1990. Podocarpaceae. In K. Kubitzki, K. U. Kramer & P. S.
Green, The families and genera of vascular plants, Pteridophytes
and Gymnospenns 1 : 332-346. Springer- Verlag, Berlin.
VON BREITENBACH, F. 1990. National list of indigenous trees. Den-
drological Foundation, Pretoria.
VON BREITENBACH, F. 1991. Miscellaneous taxonomic notes. Podo-
carpus. Journal of Dendrology 13: 43-46.
O.A. LEISTNER*, G.F. SMITH* and H.F. GLEN*
* National Botanical Institute. Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001.
MS. received: 1994-02-07.
PTERIDOPHYTA
NEW DISTRIBUTION RECORDS OF SOUTH AFRICAN PTERIDOPHYTES
This note updates the last fern floras for southern Af-
rica (Schelpe & Anthony 1986; Burrows 1990) by record-
ing some recent collections which extend currently known
distributions.
OPHIOGLOSSACEAE
1. Ophioglossum gracillimum Welw. ex Hook. &
Baker , Synopsis filicum: 445 (1868); J.E. Burrows: 40
(1990); J.E. Burrows: 153 (1992); J.E.Burrows & T.J. Ed-
wards: 186 (1993). Type: Angola, Pungo Andongo, near
Catete, Welwitsch 36 (BM, lecto.!; K!, LISU, iso.).
This very small, and consequently undercollected, fern
was found growing in mixed Acacia woodland on the mar-
gins of a seepage zone together with Ophioglossum lusoafri-
canum Welw. ex Prantl and Isoetes welwitschii A.Braun ex
Kuhn at an altitude of 1 260 m. This taxon was previously
placed in synonymy with O. lancifolium Presl (Schelpe
1970) but has recently been recognized as distinct (Burrows
& Edwards 1993). This collection, however, represents the
first record of O. gracillimum from South Africa (Figure 3).
It was previously recorded from northern Zimbabwe and
northwards through tropical Africa.
NORTHERN TRANSVAAL— 2329 (Pietersburg): Blood River, 8.8
km NW of Pietersburg, (-CD), J.E.Burrows & Venter 5224 (NU, PRE).
2. Ophioglossum rubellum Welw. ex A.Braun in
Kuhn, Filices africanae: 179 (1868); Hook. & Baker: 445
( 1868); J.E.Burrows: 205 (1992); J.E.Burrows & T.J.Edwards:
189 (1993). Type; Angola, Pungo Andongo, next to streams near
Catete, Welwitsch 33 (K, lecto.!; BM!, LISU, iso.).
Like the previous species, O. rubellum has probably been
overlooked due to its extremely small size. Where it has
been collected in Zimbabwe, il has been misidentified as O.
gomezianum Welw. ex A. Braun (Schelpe 1970; Jacobsen
1983). However, the distinctive orange or reddish pigmen-
tation of the plant, particularly on the stipes and spikes,
make it quite distinct from (). gomezianum.
The two South African records were collected on shallow,
seasonally wet soils overlying sheetrock. The Treur River
collection was made in grassland near a river on quartzites,
while the Nelspruit collection was made on granite in semi-
deciduous woodland (Figure 3). In both localities three or
more other species of Ophioglossum occurred.
EASTERN TRANSVAAL.— 2430 (Pilgrim’s Rest): Bourke’s Luck,
Goedgeloof Plantations, Treur River, (-DB), J.E.Burrows 5112 (K, PRE).
2531 (Komatipoort): Nelspruit, Nelsville, W of John Vorster Ave., (-AC),
J.E.Burrows 5228 (PRE).
FIGURE 3. — Distribution of Ophioglossum gracillimum, •; O. rubel-
lum, ■ ; and Asplenium obscurum , ▲. in southern Africa.
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
237
PTERIDACEAE
3. Pteris catoptera Kunze var. horridula Schelpe
in Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana, Ser. 2a, 41: 216
(1967); Schelpe: 118 (1970); W.Jacobsen: 241 (1983);
J.E. Burrows: 164 (1990). Type: Zimbabwe, Umtali | Mu-
tare) District, Inyamatshira Range, Chase 4890 (BOL,
holo.; BM, SRGH!, iso.).
Pteris catoptera var. catoptera is considered one of the
most common forest floor ferns occurring in evergreen
forests along the eastern escarpment of southern Africa
(Burrows 1990). In contrast, the finely prickly variety P.
catoptera var. horridula is apparently much less common.
Until recently, the only record of this taxon from South
Africa was a single collection from the Lydenburg District
of the Eastern Transvaal (J.E. Burrows 3101).
In Natal, a population of var. horridula has been ob-
served growing together with the typical variety in forest
at the base of Sterkspruit Falls. This site, which is adjacent
to the Mpofane River at an elevation of 1 450 m, is at
the foot of the Natal Drakensberg escarpment (Figure 4).
Members of this population displayed considerable
variation in the frequency of spinules on the rachises and
stipes, a character consistent with the original description
(Schelpe 1967). Specimens were found growing as under-
storey geophytes (sensu Jacobsen 1983) in forest litter on
the damp forest floor, within 5 m of the Mpofane River.
It would appear that var. horridula is more altitudinally
restricted than var. catoptera , which has been collected at
elevations ranging from sea level to I 900 m (Schelpe &
Anthony 1986). Although the Natal collection represents
a considerable southerly extension of the taxon, it is en-
visaged that further collecting will result in the closing of
the gaps between the rather disjunct records extending
from eastern Zimbabwe to Natal.
KWAZULU-NATAL. — 2929 (Underberg): Sterkspruit Falls at head
of Waterfall Bush, Mpofane River, (-AB), Crouch 661 (NH).
OLEANDRACEAE
4. Arthropteris monocarpa (Cordem.) C.Chr. in Cata-
logue des Plantes de Madagascar, Pteridophyta: 32 (1932);
Schelpe: 163 (1970); W.Jacobsen: 324 (1983); J.E.Burrows:
207 (1990). Type: Reunion, Boivin 881 (P, holo.).
The previously known distribution of this species was
disjunct with records from central Natal and eastern Zim-
babwe but with none from the region in between (Schelpe
& Anthony 1986; Burrows 1990). It has now been found
growing at the base of the eastern escarpment in the Mapu-
laneng Nature Reserve south of Mariepskop in the Eastern
Transvaal, which effectively closes this gap. The plants were
found growing over moss-covered boulders next to a moun-
tain stream in evergreen forest at an altitude of 860 m (Figure
4). It occurs in association with Thelypteris pulchra (Bory
ex Willd.) Schelpe which was previously only known from
a single record from South Africa, roughly 20 km to the
north on the lower slopes of Mariepskop.
EASTERN TRANSVAAL.— 2430 (Vaalhoek): Mapulaneng Nature
Reserve, 3.3 km NNW (straight line) of Welgevonden, (-DB), 860 m,
.1 .E. Burrows & S.M. Burrows 5238 (PRE).
ASPLENIACEAE
5. Asplenium obscurum Blume , Enumeratio plan-
tarum Javae et insularum adjacientium: 181 (1828);
Schelpe: 174 (1970); J.E.Burrows: 221 (1990). Type: In-
donesia, Java, Burangrang Mountains (type not located).
During a collecting trip to the Soutpansberg in the
Northern Transvaal, a small colony of Asplenium obscu-
rum was discovered. This is the first record of this Afro-
Pacific species for South Africa (Jacobsen 1983; Schelpe
& Anthony 1986; Burrows 1990). The species has a
mainly Asiatic distribution and in this region it has been
recorded from Indonesia and the Philippines (Jacobsen
1983). It also occurs sporadically in the moist highlands
of Zimbabwe and Mozambique, and in a few localities in
Malawi, Tanzania and Madagascar.
In the Soutpansberg, A. obscurum was found growing
between boulders in a rocky streambed in the deep shade
of evergreen forest. The colony was located 5 m from the
source of a perennial spring in association with Tectaria
gemmifera (Fee) Alston and Thelypteris madagascariensis
(Fee) Schelpe (Figure 3). This habitat is consistent with
that noted for this sciophytic species from further north
(Jacobsen 1983; Burrows 1990).
NORTHERN PROVINCE (TRANSVAAL).— 2330 (Tzaneen): Hil-
landale Farm, spring source for homestead, (-AA), Crouch 640 (NU).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The second author would like to extend thanks to
Trevor Edwards for affording him the opportunity to col-
lect Asplenium obscurum.
REFERENCES
FIGURE 4. — Distribution of Pteris catoptera var. horridula. • (new
record, O ); and Arthropteris monocarpa , ■ (new record. □ ) in BLUME, C.L. 1 828. Enumeratio plantarum Javae et insularum adjacen-
southem Africa. tium. Lugduni Batavorum.
238
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
BURROWS, J.E. 1990. Southern African ferns and fern allies. Frandsen
Publishers, Sandton.
BURROWS, J.E. 1992. The taxonomy of the genus Ophioglossum L.
(Opltioglossaceae: Pteridophyta ) in southern Africa. M.Sc. the-
sis, University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg.
BURROWS, J.E. & EDWARDS, T.J. 1993. Nomenclatural changes and
additions to the genus Ophioglossum in Africa (Opltioglossaceae:
Pteridophyta). Bothalia 23: 185-190.
CHRISTENSEN, C.F.A. 1932. Catalogue des plantes des Madagascar:
Pteridophyta. L'Academie Malgache, Tananarive.
HOOKER. W.J. & BAKER, J.G. 1868. Synopsis filicum. Hardwicke,
London.
JACOBSEN, W.B.G. 1983. Ferns and fem allies of southern Africa.
Butterworth, Durban.
KUHN. M. 1868. Filices africanae. Engelmann, Leipzig.
SCHELPE, E.A.C.L.E. 1967. New taxa of pteridophyta from south east
tropical Africa. Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana , Ser. 2, 41:
203-217.
SCHELPE, E.A.C.L.E. 1970. Pteridophyta. In A.W. Exell & E. Launert,
Flora zambesiaca. Crown Agents, London.
SCHELPE, E.A.C.L.E. & ANTHONY, N.C. 1986. Pteridophyta. In O.A.
Leistner, Flora of southern Africa. Botanical Research Institute,
Pretoria.
J.E. BURROWS* and N.R. CROUCH**
* Buffelskloof Private Nature Reserve, P.O. Box 710, Lydenburg 1 120.
** National Botanical Institute, Natal Herbarium, Botanic Gardens Road,
Durban 4001.
MS. received: 1994-11-18.
CYPERACEAE
NEW RECORDS FOR SOUTHERN AFRICA AND KWAZULU-NATAL
INTRODUC TION
Three species of Cyperaceae, previously not known from
the Flora of southern Africa (FSA) region (Retief 1993) are
here recorded from that region and two species of the same
family, previously not known from KwaZulu-Natal (Retief
1993), are newly recorded from that province.
Species new to the Flora of southern Africa region
1. Eleocharis mutata (L.) Roem. & Schult ., Systema
vegetabilium (Caroli a Linne) 2: 155 (1817).
This species has been recorded from West tropical Af-
rica (Hooper 1972), East Africa (Haines & Lye 1983) and
South America (Svenson 1929). It is the type species of
Eleocharis subgen. Limnochloa (P. Beauv. ex Lestib.)
C.B. Clarke sect. Limnochloa (P. Beauv. ex Lestib.) Ben-
tham.
It was recently collected by C.J. Ward and others at
Lake Nhlabane, south of St Lucia Estuary (28°35'S;
32°15’E). Plants were growing within an extensive stand
of Eleocharis dulcis (Burm.f.) Henschel. E. acutangula
(Roxb.) Schult. was also present, but in shallower water
towards the lake margin.
Specimens examined (Note: all numbers cited are depos-
ited in K, NH, NU, PRE, UDW, except that C.J. Ward <£
A. Rajh 11464 is not at K.)
KWAZLILU-NATAL. — 2832 (Mtubatuba): Lake Nhlabane, S of St
Lucia estuary, (-CB): E. mutata : C.J. Ward & A. Rajh 11600', C.J. Ward
&C.W. Begg 11715. 11717. E. dulcis: C.J. Ward & A. Rajh 11459, 11464.
11597. E. acutangula: C.J. Ward & G.W. Begg 11378.
2. Eleocharis decoriglumis Berhaut in Bulletin de
la Societe, Botanique de France 100: 174 (1953).
This decorative species, worthy of cultivation in water
features, has been recorded from West Africa (Hooper
1972; Vanden Berghen 1988) and from East Africa
(Uganda and Tanzania), where it is reported as ‘very rare’
(Haines & Lye 1983). It is described as an annual, unlike
its two close relatives E. acutangula and E. variegata ,
both of which are stoloniferous perennials, but which lack
the striking green and black glume colour contrasts of E.
decoriglumis. A recent survey of exsiccata has revealed
two specimens of E. decoriglumis from the same locality
in Botswana. These collections were made by different
workers and there is an interval of three months between
their gatherings.
Specimens examined (Note: these specimens had pre-
viously been named E. variegata and Eleocharis sp., com-
pare to E. acutangula respectively.)
BOTSWANA. — 2023 (Kwebe Hills): Boteti River relict floodplain
below Samedupe Bridge, 20.06°75'S; 23.31°6'E, PA. Smith 1900 (PRE,
SRGH); R.P Ellis 2980 (PRE).
3. Pycreus muricatus (Kiik.) Napper in Journal of
the East African Natural History Society 28, No. 124: 6
(1971).
This species may be confused with R unioloides
(R.Br.) C.B. Clarke, which is pantropic in distribution; in
Africa it is well known and widespread. P. muricatus dif-
fers from this better known relative in developing stolons
and in its more markedly sculptured (muricate-zonate)
achene. In P. unioloides the short rhizome that links the
shoots is non-permanent and may be lacking; the achene
surface is nearly smooth with faintly marked longitudinal
cells that wear away.
Plants of P. muricatus were growing in abundance at
Graskop. The species is also known from Lydenburg.
Specimens examined
NORTHERN PROVINCE (TRANSVAAL).— 2430 (Pilgrims Rest):
Graskop, (-DD), ./. Browning 653 (BOL, GENT, K, NU, PRE), 658
(NU).
EASTERN TRANSVAAL.— 2530 (Lydenburg): Onverwacht 733JT
Game Trust, (-DD), ./. Browning 504 (NU).
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
239
Species new to the flora of KwaZulu-Natal
1. Eleocharis variegata (Poir.) C. Presl in Oken,
Isis 21: 269 (1828).
This variable species has a wide, but scattered tropical
distribution (Hooper 1972). In the FSA area it is reported
only from Botswana (Retief 1993). Plants are more slen-
der and shorter than most other representatives of subgen.
Limnochloa , but in general morphology relate to those of
E. acutangula and E. mutata. There is variability in culm
structure from terete, to trigonous and quadrangular and
sometimes twisted, which range of form is not known for
E. acutangula or E. mutata. There are also differences in
floral glumes, achenes and perianth bristles that will not
be detailed here.
Plants are here reported from two localities in Natal,
where they were growing either in association with E.
acutangula (in the Howick area) or with E. mutata and
E. acutangula (Lake Nhlabane).
Specimens examined
KWAZULU-NATAL. — 2832 (Mtubatuba): Lake Nhlabane, S of St
Lucia Estuary, (-CB): E. variegata: C.J. Ward & G.W. Begg 11716 (K,
NH, NU, PRE, UDW). E. acutangula: C.J. Ward & G.W. Begg 11378
(K, NH. NU, PRE, UDW). 2930 (Pietermaritzburg): Howick area, Gart-
more Farm. 29°21'S, 30°16'E, (-AC): E. variegata: P.B. Taylor 132
(NU). E. acutangula: P.B. Taylor 73/(NU).
2. Scleria unguiculata E.A. Rob. in Kew Bulletin
18: 536 (1966).
This species has previously been reported for Togo,
East Africa (Tanzania), Central African Republic and
Zambia (Haines & Lye 1983). In southern Africa it is
known only from Botswana (Franklin Hennessy 1985;
Retief 1993).
It is here reported for KwaZulu-Natal. Slender plants
were growing in acid bog (sedge meadow), the culms par-
tially supported by associated vegetation. Growing in the
same microhabitat were plants of S. achtenii De Wild.,
which has obovoid to subglobose, white-haired achenes
in contrast to the ovoid-ellipsoid, fulvous-haired achenes
of S. unguiculata. This record is the first for the Republic
of South Africa and increases by ± 10°S latitude, the
known distributional area of the species.
Specimens examined
KWAZULU-NATAL. — 2832 (Mtubatuba): Lake Nhlabane, S of St
Lucia Estuary, (-CB), C.J. Ward & A. Rajh 11611 (NU, PRE, UDW).
REFERENCES
BERHAUT, R.R. 1953. Nouveautes dans les Cyperacees du Senegal.
Bulletin de la Societe Botanique de France 100: 173-176.
FRANKLIN HENNESSY. E.F. 1985. The genus Scleria in southern
Africa. Bothalia 15: 505-530.
HAINES, R.W. & LYE, K.A. 1983. The sedges and rushes of East Africa.
East African Natural History Society, Nairobi.
HOOPER, S.S. 1972. Eleocharis (Cyperaceae). Flora of West tropica l
Africa 2nd edn 3,2: 311-314. London.
KUKKONEN, I. 1990. On the genus Eleocharis (Cyperaceae) in the
Flora Iranica area, with revised infrageneric classification and
nomenclature. Annals Botanici Fennici 27: 109-117.
NAPPER, D.M. 1971. Pycreus (Cyperaceae). Journal of the East African
Natural ' History Society 28, No. 124: 1-24.
PRESL. C. 1828. Oken Isis 21: 269.
RETIEF. E. 1993. Cyperaceae (distribution). In T.H. Arnold & B.C. de
Wet, Plants of southern Africa: names and distribution. Memoirs
of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 62: 102-116.
ROBINSON, E.A. 1966. A provisional account of the genus Scleria Berg.
(Cyperaceae) in the Flora Zambesiaca area. Kew Bulletin 18:
487-551.
ROEMER. J.J. & SCHULTES, J.A. 1817. Systema vegetabilium (Caroli
a Linne) 2. Stuttgardtiae.
SVENSON, H.K. 1929. Monographic studies in the genus Eleocharis.
Rhodora 31: 121-125, 152-191.
VANDEN BERGHEN, C. 1988. Cyperacees. In J. Berhaut, Flore illustree
du Senegal 9: 139-347.
J. BROWNING*, K.D. GORDON-GRAY* and C.J. WARD+
* Department of Botany, University of Natal, Private Bag X01,
Scottsville 3209.
+ P.O. Box 25139, Sea View 4073, KwaZulu-Natal.
LUNULARIACEAE
FRUITING LUNULARIA CRUCIATA. NOW ALSO REPORTED FROM SOUTHERN AFRICA
Sexual reproduction in Lunularia cruciata (L.) Du-
mort. ex Lindb. occurs only rarely or sporadically. In an
earlier article on Lunularia cruciata (Perold 1993), I did
not describe mature archegoniophores with sporophytes,
because no examples were available at PRE for study. In
an attempt to raise them in cultivation, male plants col-
lected in a nursery in Krugersdorp, west of Johannesburg
(Koekemoer 1004) and female plants from Harold Porter
National Botanical Garden, Betty's Bay (Perold et al.
3029), were planted together in September 1993 on soil
in a pot and kept in a secluded courtyard. Although grow-
ing well and watered regularly, fertilization did not take
place.
Recently, in late spring, on 8 November 1994, I re-
ceived live material with androecial discs (Figure 5A) and
archegoniophores in various stages of maturity (Figures
5B, C) from Mrs Susan Strauss, who maintains a shade-
net enclosure. Although not new to science, another de-
scription of mature archegoniophores and sporophytes,
this time from southern Africa, was deemed permissible,
as Amell’s (1963) description, in which he mistakenly re-
fers to the ‘peduncle of the female organ' as furrowed, is
very brief and is almost certainly not based on southern
African material. Even Saxton (1931), who described the
life history of Lunularia cruciata partly from southern Af-
rican collections, had to wait many years, i.e. from 1908,
240
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
FIGURE 5. — Lunularia cruciata. A, lhalli with androecial discs; B, thalli with young, still sessile archegoniophores; C, stalked archegoniophores;
D, mature archegoniophore, shedding spores and elaters; E, portion of stalk in transverse section, showing cortical and medullary cells; F,
seta in transverse section; G, germinating spore. A-G, S. Strauss 64. A, B, x 2.5; C, x 2; D, x 3: E, x 175; F. x 70; G, x 700. E-G, LM photographs.
when initially ‘a small patch of fertile plants was found
... in the Municipal Gardens at Cape Town' [which he
appears not to have described!, until fruiting material was
eventually forwarded to him from Dartmouth, England,
in 1925-1928. The youngest stages of the archegoniopho-
res were missing, however, and their description was only
completed more than 20 years later, by Benson-Evans &
Hughes (1954), based on English collections. Campbell
(1965) also added some supplementary notes regarding
the early stages in New Zealand material. Schuster (1992)
reports the species as relatively often fertile in the south
of Spain, but rarely in North America. Sergio & Viana
(1973) found one-fifth of the collections in Portugal to
have sporophytes. Germination of the spores (Figure 5G)
was described by Groenland ( 1954), Chalaud (1932) and
also by Campbell (1965) but, as far as 1 am aware, SEM
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
241
micrographs of the spores and elaters have not previously
been published.
DESCRIPTION OF ARCHEGONIOPHORE, SPOROPHYTES AND
SPORES
Juvenile archegoniophore sessile (Figure 5B), apical part
roundly convex to shortly 4-lobed, ± 2 mm in diameter, with
small, central swelling, lime-green and somewhat shiny,
basally surrounded by densely imbricate layers of cottony,
white scales with upper edges irregularly fringed with fili-
form cellular appendages (Figure 6F). Archegonia in 4
groups, up to 8 (or more) in each, of these only 1 or 2(3)
or even none becoming fertilized, located between lobes,
opposite indentations, and surrounded by furrows, with
raised margins which rapidly grow out to form tubular in-
volucres. By expansion of central domed region, all sub-
sequently carried to underside, initially drooping, later almost
horizontally spreading outwards in shape of a cross, from a
common, reduced central disc lacking photosynthetic tissue.
Involucres yellowish white, almost smooth, rather delicate,
5 cell layers (± 160 pm) thick, numerous oil bodies present,
outer cells 35.0-75.0 x 25.0-37.5 pm, 4- or 5-sided, some
long-rectangular; smaller, however, 25-30 x 25-35 pm, at
margins of eventual distal opening, through which, by elon-
gation of setae, capsules become exserted (Figure 5D), after
rupturing calyptra; pseudoperianth lacking. When sporo-
phytes nearly ripe, stalk elongates, trailing silvery white,
thread-like filaments with it, archegoniophore still partially
covered by scales, and foot of stalk surrounded by large,
erect scales, up to 2500 x 2500 pm, cells 4— 6(-7)-sided,
37.5-52.5 x 22.5-25.0 pm, filiform appendages consisting
of elongated cells, ± 65 x 20 pm, linearly arranged in a
single row. Stalk eventually up to 34 mm long, gradually
narrowing upwards, translucent white, in transverse section
rounded to oval toward base, 825-950 x 750-850 pm,
cortical cells in 1 row, 15.0-22.5 x 12.5-25.0 pm, outer
walls hardly thicker, medullary cells angular, 35.0-47.5
pm wide (Figure 5E), slightly thickened at comers, lack-
ing rhizoid furrow as well as photosynthetic tissue, shaggy
with scattered, white, thread-like filaments; after spores
and elaters have been shed, soon collapsing. Calyptra en-
larging with growth of sporophyte, its wall ± 4 cell layers
(62.5 pm) thick, outer cells rectangular or polygonal, 45-60
x 20-25 pm, archegonial neck remaining attached. Sporo-
phyte with foot subspherical, small, green; seta hyaline,
150-300 pm in diameter, rapidly elongating to ± 2 mm, in
transverse section (Figure 5F), cortical cells 30.0-32.5 x
17.5-25.0 pm, medullary cells round or isodiametric, 25-40
pm wide, walls slightly undulate; capsule dark brown, obo-
void, ± 1.25 mm long, wall unistratose, lacking thickenings,
cells rectangular, 20.0-25.0 x 12.5-15.0 pm and 25 pm thick,
tiny distal cap bistratose and soon shed intact dehiscing length-
wise into 4 lanceolate valves, some bifid at apex, folding back
to base of capsule and releasing numerous spores and elaters.
Spores light brown, when fresh many filled with chloroplasts,
apolar, triradiate mark absent (Figure 6A), mostly spherical or
ovate (Figure 6B), frequently with indentations (Figure 6C),
wall thin, densely granulate (Figure 6D), diameter
( 1 2.5—) 1 5.0—22.5 pm; enlarging and germinating after 3 or 4
weeks (Figure 6G), a colourless germ rhizoid (Nehira 1983)
emerging from it. Elaters light brown, bispiral (Figure 6E),
longly tapering at both ends, 320-350 pm long, 5-6 pm wide
in centre, tips 2.5 pm.
DISCUSSION
Various reasons have been suggested for the low inci-
dence of sexual reproduction in Lunularia cruciata but no
causal relationship could be found between its sexual fer-
FIGURE 6 .-Lunularia cruciata. A, round spore; B, ovate spore; C, indented spore; D, granular ornamentation on exine much enlarged; E, part of 2
elaters; F, young archegoniophore, covered with scales with long filiform appendages at margins. A, B, D, E, S. Strauss 64; C, Angusto LISU
147800 ; F, Koekemoer 1004. A, x 226; B, x 199; C, x 222; D, x 612; E. x 191; F, x 31. A-F, SEM micrographs.
242
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
tility or sterility and, for example, the presence or absence
of the fungus, Phoma lunulariicola Ramsay, often asso-
ciated with it (Benson-Evans & Hughes 1954). Unusual
weather conditions were shown by Goodman (1956) to
have no obvious correlation with the initiation of recep-
tacles. On the other hand, Benson-Evans & Hughes (1954)
found that there was an obvious correlation between the
regular production of sexual organs and a Mediterranean
type of climate. They also conclude that there is a pre-
ceding low temperature requirement in Lunularia and that
this is comparable to vernalization in higher plants. Camp-
bell (1965) refers to the work by Nachmony-Bascomb &
Schwabe (1963) who demonstrated a response to photo-
period in Israeli plants. However, any interpretation of the
behaviour of the New Zealand plants in the light of these
findings was complicated by the fact that winter tempera-
tures in New Zealand are much lower than those in Israel.
Sergio & Viana (1973) suggest ‘that the availability of
water is the limiting factor in the development of the
sporophytes as it was shown by the geographic distribu-
tion of the fruiting plants’; and they continue: ‘this distri-
bution is correlated with a humid Mediterranean type of
climate’.
As far as the southern African plants are concerned, it
is possible that the formation of gametangiophores was
initiated by the unusually severe winter we experienced
in 1994. Although the plants were somewhat protected in
Mrs Strauss’ shade-net enclosure, it was unheated and
they may have become ‘vernalized’. Synchronous matu-
ration of spermatozoids and eggs and their close proximity
must have led to fertilization and the subsequent produc-
tion of sporophytes several months later.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I sincerely wish to thank Mrs Susan Strauss of Pretoria
for bringing me plants of Lunularia cruciata with sporo-
phytes. My thanks also to Dr C. Sergio, Lisbon, for send-
ing me material with mature archegoniophores from Por-
tugal and for reviewing this note; to Mrs A. Romanowski
for taking some of the photographs and for printing all of
them, also to Mrs J. Mulvenna for typing the manuscript.
REFERENCES
ARNELL, S.W. 1963. Hepaticae of South Africa. Swedish Natural Sci-
ence Council, Stockholm.
BENSON-EVANS, K. & HUGHES, J.G. 1954. The physiology of sexual
reproduction in Lunularia cruciata (L.) Dumort. Transactions of
the British Bryological Society 2: 5 1 3-52 1 .
CAMPBELL, E.O 1965. Lunularia in New Zealand. Tuatara 113: 31^t2.
CHALAUD, G. 1932. Germination des spores et phase protonemique.
Manual of Bryology. 89-108.
GOODMAN, G.T. 1956. Sexual Lunularia cruciata (L.) Dumort. in South
Wales. Transactions of the British Bryological Society 3: 98-102.
GROENLAND, J. 1854. Memoire sur la germination de quelques Hepa-
tiques. Annales des sciences naturelles, Ser. 4: 5-29.
NACHMONY-BASCOMB, S. & SCHWABE, W.W. 1963. Growth and
dormancy in Lunularia cruciata (L.) Dumort. 1. Journal of Ex-
perimental Botany 14: 153-171.
NEHIRA, K. 1983. Spore germination, protonema development and
sporeling development. New Manual of Bryology 1: 343-385.
PEROLD, S.M. 1993. Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from
southern Africa. 1. The genus Dumortiera and D. hirsuta ; the
genus Lunularia and L. cruciata. Bothalia 23: 49-57.
SAXTON, W.T. 1931. The life history of Lunularia cruciata (L.) Du-
mort., with special reference to the archegoniophore and sporo-
phyte. Transactions of the Roval Society of South Africa 19:
259-268.
SERGIO, C. & VIANA, M.J. 1973. Sur la fertilite de Lunularia cruciata
(L.) Dum. au Portugal. Revista da Faculdade de Ciencias de
Lisboa 17: 703-720.
SCHUSTER. R.M. 1992. The hepaticae and anthocerotae of North
America 6: 1-937.
S.M. PEROLD*
♦National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001.
MS. received: 1995-01-17.
ERICACEAE
A NEW SPECIES OF ERICA FROM THE WESTERN CAPE
Erica karooica E.G.H. Oliv., sp. nov.
Rami puberuli. Folia 3-nata, erecta, 2-3 mm longa,
lineari-oblonga, glabra, ciliolata; petiolo ± 0.5 mm longo,
appresso. Flores 3-6-nati terminales; pedicello ± 1 mm
longo, dense puberulo; bractea mediana, bracteolis subap-
proximatis. Calyx 4-lobatus, base puberula, breviter ciliatus
et glandibus sessilibus rubris, viridis. Corolla 4-lobata, 1.3 x
1.0 mm, glabra, straminea, brunnescens, obconica. Stamina
8, libera, subexserta; antheris ovatis muticis; polline in
tetradis. Ovarium 4-loculare, 0.5 x 0.5 mm, obovoideum,
glabrum, emarginatum; nectariis absentibus; placenta in
dimidio superiore; ovulis 8 in quoque loculo pendentibus;
stylo exserto; stigmate latissime cyathiformi. Figura 7.
TYPE/ — Western Cape 3321 (Ladismith): Ladismith
Dist., southern foothills of Great Swartberg on Vaart-
wel/Bergplaas farms, waboomveld on steep, dry, stony,
south slopes northeast of lower Bergplaas, 808 m, (-BC),
6-04-1994, Oliver 10447 (STE, holo.; BM, BOL, E, K,
MEL, MO, P, PRE, S, W, iso.).
Erect dense shrub to 1.25 m tall, single-stemmed.
Branches wiry flexuose, very shortly puberulous with oc-
casional glands intermixed, no infrafoliar ridges, bark grey
flaking irregularly when old. Leaves 3-nate, erect, imbri-
cate, 2-3 mm long, linear-oblong, subacute to obtuse,
rounded in transverse section, sulcate, very shortly cilio-
late and with a few sessile glands when young, otherwise
glabrous; petiole ± 0.5 mm long, appressed, shortly ciliate.
Flowers 3-6 at ends of main branches and short lateral
branchlets, erect; pedicel ± 1 mm long, densely puberu-
lous, reddish; bract median, appressed, ± 0.7 mm long,
oblong, terminally sulcate, glabrous, minutely ciliate, pale
green; bracteoles subapproximate, like the bract but
slightly smaller. Calyx 4-lobed, ± 0.8 mm long, green,
lobes erect, V3—I 2/3 length of calyx, ovate to deltoid, sub-
acute to obtuse, apically sulcate, puberulous at base.
FIGURE 7. — Erica karooica E.G.H. Oliv.: A, flowering branch; B, branchlet & leaf; C, flower; D, anther, side, front & back views; E, gynoecium;
E\ ovary, opened laterally; F, fruiting gynoecium; G, seed. Drawn from Taylor 10362 (STE).
shortly ciliate with hairs and a few sessile red glands.
Corolla 4-lobed, 1.3 x 1.0 mm, obconical, glabrous, dull
translucent cream soon turning brown, lobes erect to
slightly incurved, V3 length of corolla, subacute, some-
times sparsely crenulate. Stamens 8, free, erect; filaments
linear 0.7 mm long; anthers subexserted, muticous, thecae
ovate in outline, glabrous, golden brown, pore V2 length
of theca; pollen in tetrads. Ovary 4-locular, 0.5 x 0.5 mm,
obovoid, 8-lobed, glabrous, emarginate, with no nectary
glands at base, ovules ± 8 per locule, pendent, placenta
confined to upper half; style exserted, ± 1.1 mm long,
red; stigma very broadly cyathiform, red. Capsule 1.2 x
1.0 mm, narrowly cyathiform, septa split for % their
length, upper part of septa 50% on axis and 50% on valve;
seeds 0.5 x 0.2 mm, slightly flattened ellipsoid, smooth
and shiny, yellow to brown, with a distinct short paler
elaiosome. Figure 7.
This new species is most closely related to the widespread
eastern Cape species, E. caespitosa Hilliard |= Philippia tris-
tis Bolus], but may be distinguished by its single-stemmed
reseeding habit, densely hairy pedicel with a hairy base to
the calyx, always two free bracteoles, open broadly obconic
corolla with the anthers clearly visible being half exserted
and a very broadly cyathiform stigma.
E. caespitosa , as its name suggests, is a low, multi-
stemmed resprouter with a glabrous, or occasionally
sparsely puberulous, pedicel and glabrous calyx, globose
to broadly urceolate corolla with included anthers and ob-
conic stigma. E. caespitosa occasionally possesses two
bracteoles on the pedicel, but usually has none with the
bract often fully recaulescent and forming part of the calyx
in the philippioid condition (Oliver 1988).
E. karooica has small insignificantly coloured flowers that
are developed for wind pollination (Rebelo et al. 1985). At
the type locality plants gave off small puffs of pollen into
the wind when disturbed. The flowers are very similar at
first glance to those in the minor genera of the Ericoideae
like Salaxis Salisb. and Coccospemui Klotzsch, and therefore
would probably not attract much attention among collectors.
The flowers are unusual in that the corolla is a very translucent
white with the red immature anthers clearly visible inside. Soon
after the stigma appears beyond the corolla mouth, the corolla
looses its colour, dries out and turns brown before the anthers
have appeared and shed their pollen. I have not noticed this
feature in any other species.
The possession of an elaiosome on the seeds is a char-
acter that has never before been recorded in the Eri-
coideae. This is, however, not the only species that I have
recently found, in the closer examination of Erica spp.,
to possess such an appendage. The biological implications
of this character need some detailed field investigations.
The species is fairly widespread in the southern region
of South Africa (Figure 8) with most of the collections
coming from the mountains in and around the Little
Karoo, hence the name. Within this distribution range the
species occurs in a wide variety of habitats from low to
high altitude. Most, however, occur on southern slopes of
mountains in mountain fynbos on quartzitic soils. In the
far west it occurs at low altitude, 500 m, in dry fynbos
on Malmesbury shales. On the eastern end of the Great
Swartberg it occurs on the summit ridges at 1 500 m.
Surprising localities are those on the coastal plain east of
Riversdale and north of Bredasdorp.
The nearest localities of E. caespitosa are in the
Sneeuberg west of Graaff-Reinet 130 km to the north and
the Boschberg above Somerset East 1 80 km to the northeast.
Flowering period is from March to May.
244
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
Specimens examined
WESTERN & EASTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): Robertson Dist.,
Klaasvoogds West, Kortrug, on SW-facing slopes of Langeberg on Farm
Bergendal, 500 m, (-DD), 20-10-1989 (fruiting), McDonald 1824 (BOL,
K, MO, PRE, STE). 3321 (Ladismith): Ladismith Dist., Calitzdorp area, S
foothills of Great Swartberg on Vaartwel/Bergplaas farms, waboomveld on
steep S slopes NE of the lower Bergplaas Farm, 808 m, (-BC). 6-04-1994.
E.GH. & t.M. Oliver 10447 (BM. BOL, E, K, MEL MO, P, PRE, S, STE,
W); Ladismith Dist., Farm Bergplaas, waboomveld on steep S slopes, 790
m, (-BC), 9-04-1982, Taylor 10362 (BM, K, MO, PRE, STE); Ladismith
Dist., S slopes of Roodeberg, (-CB), 14-05-1950, Esterhuysen 17140 (BOL,
STE); Ladismith Dist., Rooiberg, above waterfall in Groenkloof below hut,
1 130 m, (-DA), 22-04-1977, Taylor 9642 (K, PRE, STE); Ladismith Dist.,
Gamka Mtn, S slope SW of beacon, 1 000 m, (-DB), 23-05-1975, Boshoff
PI 39 (STE); Calitzdorp area, Gamka Reserve, Boskloof, on rugged sand-
stone slope, (-DB), 23-05-1975, Esterhuysen 33843 (BOL, STE). 3322
(Oudtshoom): Oudtshoom Dist., Meiringspoort, (-BC), 25-08-1991, Schu-
mann 791 (PRE, STE); Willowmore Dist., eastern Swartberg on crest of
Snyberg, 1 500 m, (-BD), 11-03-1991, Vlok 2456 (STE). 3323 (Willow-
more): Willowmore Dist., Zuurberg Poort, Farm Modderfontein, 824 m,
(-AB), 22-09-1923, Andreae 1040 (K, PRE, STE); Willowmore Dist., Wit-
teberg [Witberg], peak N of World’s View [Wildsview], 1 540 m, (-BA),
26-07-1986, Vlok 1542 (STE). 3420 (Bredasdorp): Bredasdorp Dist., hills
E of Vrede on Swellendam/Bredasdorp main road, 950 m, (-AC), 2-09-1994
(fruiting), Oliver 10548 (STE). 3421 (Riversdale): Platkop, SE of the town,
(-AB), 20-10-1987 (fruiting), Rebelo et al. 58/1 (STE).
REFERENCES
OLIVER, E.G.H. 1988. Studies in the Ericaceae (Ericoideae). VI. The
generic relationship between Erica and Philippia in southern
Africa. Bothalia 18: 1-10.
REBELO, A.G., SIEGFRIED. W.R. & OLIVER, E.G.H. 1985. Pollina-
tion syndromes of Erica species in the southwestern Cape. South
African Journal of Botany 51: 270-280.
E.G.H. OLIVER*
* Stellenbosch Herbarium, National Botanical Institute, P.O. Box 471,
Stellenbosch 7599.
MS. received: 1995-05-17.
ASTERACEAE
A NOTE ON URS1N1A BR ACHY LOB A
Bremer & Humphries (1993: 93), made what they
thought was a new combination in Ursinia for Sphenogyne
brachyloba Kunze (1847: 21). However, N.E. Brown (1887:
670) had already made this combination. The correct author
citation for this name should therefore be:
Ursinia brachyloba (Kunze) N.E. Br.
REFERENCES
BROWN, N.E. 1887. Plants new or noteworthy. The Gardeners' Chron-
icle 1 Ser. 3: 670.
KUNZE, G. 1847. Pugillus tertius plantarum. Linnaea 20: 21.
P.P.J. HERMAN*
BREMER, K. & HUMPHRIES, C. 1993. Generic monograph of the
Asteraceae-Anthemideae. Bulletin of the Natural History Mu- * National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XI 01, Pretoria 0001.
seum London (Botany) 23: 93. MS. received: 1995-03-14.
A NEW COMBINATION IN COTULA
Bremer & Humphries (1993) sank the South African
species of the genus Matricaria under Cotida. They did
not consider the varieties of M. nigellifolia', they merely
came to the conclusion that this taxon belongs under Co-
tula (pers. comm.). PRE upholds the varieties under M.
nigellifolia as described by De Candolle (1827), Harvey
(1865), Hutchinson (1917) and Hilliard (1977). It is there-
fore necessary to make the new combination.
Cotula nigellifolia (DC.) Bremer & Humphries var.
tenuior (DC.) P.P.J. Herman comb. nov.
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
245
Matricaria nigellifolia DC. var. tenuior DC., Pro-
dromus systematis 6: 50 (1837).
REFERENCES
BREMER, K. & HUMPHRIES, C. 1993. Generic monograph of the
Asteraceae-Anthemideae. Bulletin of the Natural History Mu-
seum (Botany Series) 23: 157-159.
DE CANDOLLE, A.P. 1 837. Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vege-
tabilis 6: 50.
HARVEY, W.H. 1865. Compositae. Flora capensis 3: 164. Hodges,
Smith, Dublin.
HILLIARD, O.M. 1977. Compositae in Natal. University of Natal Press,
Pietermaritzburg.
HUTCHINSON, J. 1917. Notes on African Compositae: 4. Kew Bulletin: 1 1 5.
P.P.J. HERMAN*
* National Herbarium, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XI 01,
Pretoria 0001.
MS. received: 1995-05-29.
AUTHOR CITATION ‘EX KRAUSS' IN NOMENCLATURE
In a number of recent articles on South African tax-
onomy, Krauss has been cited as the publishing author of
species names, thus ‘ex Krauss’.
C.F.F. Krauss was a collector who apparently did not
describe the plants he collected, but used various special-
ists to describe them for him. These descriptions were put
together for publication in a series of articles entitled
Pflanzen des Cap- und Natal-Landes gesammelt und
zusammengestellt von Dr Ferdinand Krauss These arti-
cles appeared in the periodical Flora, Vols 27-29
(1844-1846). This information is clearly stated by Gunn
& Codd in Botanical exploration of southern Africa
(1981: 212).
The term ‘ex’ in the author citation of a plant name
means that the person whose name follows the ‘ex’ was
the person who validly published the plant name but was
not the first person to give it a name (Jeffrey 1982: 89).
Consider the case of Marchantia contractu Bisch. ex
Krauss cited in Bischler-Causse (1993). This author cita-
tion implies that Bischoff was the author of the name, but
failed to fulfil all requirements for valid publication and
that valid publication was later effected by Krauss. Bis-
choff, at the request of Krauss, provided the name amd
description and this was published by Krauss in Flora 29:
134 (1846). Therefore Bischoff is the sole author of the
plant name. According to Note 1 of Article 46.2 of the
ICBN (Greuter et al. 1994) the word ‘in' is sometimes
used when the authorship of a plant name differs from
the author of the publication in which it was validly pub-
lished. It would therefore be ‘Bisch. in Krauss’ in the
present example, but in such a case, ‘in’ and what follows
are part of a bibliographic citation and are better omitted.
The correct citation is therefore M. contractu Bisch.
A similar example published in Flora 27 (1844) is
Harpephyllum caffrum Bemh. ex Krauss which appears
in Flora Zambesiaca 2: 557 (1966). The correct citation
is H. caffrum Bemh.
REFERENCES
BISCHLER-CAUSSE, H. 1993. Marchantia L.: the European and Afri-
can taxa. Bryophytorum Bibliotheca 45.
IEFFREY, C. 1982. An introduction to plant taxonomy , 2nd edn. Cam-
bridge University Press, Cambridge.
GREUTER, W. ET AL. 1994. International code of botanical nomencla-
ture adopted by the 1 5th International Botanical Congress, Yoko-
hama, August-September 1993. Regnum Vegetabile 131.
GUNN, M. & CODD, L.E. 1981. Botanical exploration of southern
Africa. Botanical Research Institute/Balkema, Cape Town.
B.A. MOMBERG*
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001 .
Bothalia 25,2: 247-253 ( 1995)
The psocid Uposcelis bostrychophilus Badonnel (Psocoptera: Liposcelidae):
an occasional herbarium pest
E. RETIEF*, A. NICHOLAS** and H. BAIJNATH**
Keywords: booklice, herbarium curation, herbarium hygiene, herbarium pests, insect pests, Liposcelis bostrychophilus , pest eradication, Psocoptera
ABSTRACT
The herbarium pest Liposcelis bostrychophilus is described and illustrated. Aspects of the insect’s life cycle and eradication
are discussed. Where possible, non-toxic methods, such as sterile-entry techniques of control, should be used. If infestations are
epidemic and serious damage is being incurred, there may be no alternative but to use pesticides or fumigants.
UITTREKSEL
Die herbariumplaag Liposcelis bostrychophilus word beskryf en geillustreer. Aspekte van die insek se lewensiklus en
uitroeiing word bespreek. Waar moontlik, moet nie-toksiese metodes, soos steriele-ingangstegnieke vir beheer, gebruik word.
Indien besmettings epidemies van aard is en ernstige skade sou berokken, is plaagdoders of berokingsmiddels waarskynlik
onvermydelik.
INTRODUCTION
One of the most serious problems in herbarium cura-
tion, especially in tropical regions, is the protection of
valuable plant specimens from damage by insects. In the
past, various animal pests have been encountered at the
National Herbarium in Pretoria (PRE), including cigarette
beetles, cockroaches, rats and fishmoths. Of these,
Lasioderma serricome (F.), the cigarette or tobacco beetle,
has caused the most severe damage to herbarium speci-
mens (Retief & Nicholas 1988). The National Herbarium
Pretoria is located on the southern African highveld, and
conditions here are quite different from those encountered
at one of its satellite herbaria, the Natal Herbarium (NH)
in Durban. Unlike Pretoria, where conditions are usually
moderate to cold and dry in winter, Durban has a more
tropical climate, with warm and humid conditions. As a
result, a psocid, rather than L. serricome is the primary
pest in this herbarium. In 1986, during one of these psocid
infestations, samples of the insect involved were collected
for study and identification. By obtaining a correct scien-
tific name it was hoped that, through the literature, a
greater understanding of the pest could be reached, in-
cluding a suitable, safe method of eradication. The insect
was identified as the common booklouse: Liposcelis bos-
trychophilus Badonnel (fide C. Lienhard of the Museum
d’Histoire Naturelle, Geneve), of the Order Psocoptera
(Figure 1).
It should be mentioned, however, that these insects are
not true lice, which belong to the Order Mallophaga, and
that the common names booklice or barklice are therefore
misleading. Although common names are generally of lit-
* National Herbarium, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101,
Pretoria 000 1 .
** Botany Department, University of Durban-Westville, Private Bag
X5400 1 , Durban 4000.
MS received: 1994-08-30.
tie scientific value, the term psocid, given to members of
the psocopteran family Psocidae, does seem more appro-
priate.
DISCUSSION
Psocid taxonomy and general information
Liposcelis Motschulsky belongs to the family Lipo-
scelidae in the suborder Troctomorpha. In this suborder
parthenogenesis is frequent, and Pearman (1928) believes
that in many species the male is not a vital necessity for
reproduction; certainly this is true of Liposcelis bostry-
chophilus which is an obligated parthenogen; males have
never been found. Liposcelis is characterized by being
moderately dorsoventrally depressed and completely ap-
terous (without wings) in both sexes. The coxae are ven-
trolaterally inserted and their articulation with the thorax
is therefore not visible from above. The broad hind femur
has a dorsal, obtuse protuberance at its widest point. The
genus contains a number of species complexes with in-
herent taxonomic difficulties; one such complex includes
L. bostrychophilus and L. corrodens Heymons (Broadhead
1950). ’
Members of the family Liposcelidae can be distin-
guished by their dorsoventrally depressed bodies, elongate-
oval abdomen, hindlegs not extended beyond the apex of
the abdomen and antennae not longer than Vi to 3A the
length of the body (Smithers 1985).
Most members of the family Liposcelidae are found in
association with dry leaves or under bark, although some
appear to be associated with grass galls or with ants' nests.
A few psocids have become pests by inhabiting man-made
structures (including homes) and damaging his resources
(especially stored goods). Through commerce these par-
ticular species are now quite cosmopolitan in distribution.
248
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
although Broadhead (1950) points out that air currents
may also help in the dispersal of these small insects,
live specimens having been collected on air currents at
altitudes of 150 m or more. These species are usually
not harmful to man and are generally included in the
category of nuisance, although they should be regarded
as a warning that environmental conditions are becom-
ing ripe for proliferation of other insect pests (Hickin
1985). Although not true ectoparasites, there are a few
very rare reports of infestations of living animals (Gur-
ney 1950), such as humans, dogs, chinchillas and pos-
sibly birds. However, psocids seem to occur on living
animals only under exceptional, usually unhygienic cir-
cumstances.
Smithers (1967) lists 58 species of Liposcelis , although
an anonymously annotated copy of this list housed at the
Entomology Department of the Natural History Museum in
London (seen in 1990) catalogues a further 44 names, con-
stituting a genus of approximately 100 species, possibly
more. The last detailed revision of the genus is that of Broad-
head ( 1 950), who listed only 24 species. According to Smith-
ers (1985) 80 species of the Order Psocoptera (in some 34
genera) and 12 species (in three genera) of the family
Liposcelidae have been recorded in southern Africa.
Psocid pests
Gurney (1950) reported that no more than a dozen pso-
cids are known to be pests, but Mockford (1991 ) recorded
some 50 species as occurring on stored foods. These pest
species are usually soft-bodied, 1 to 2 mm long, wingless
or with very short oval wings, with chewing mouthparts
(Figure 2C, D) and a large, swollen postclypeus (the upper
exoskeletal plate that covers the mandibles — Figure 2B);
the antennae are thread-like with many segments, parthe-
nogenesis is common, and the majority of species have
six nymphal stages (although metamorphosis in the egg
and nymphal stages is incomplete). They feed largely on
microflora such as fungal molds but, being polyphagous,
may also eat pollen and other organic materials, including
dead animal (mainly insect) and plant remains (such as
straw). In the food industry they have been reported as
feeding on bananas, barley, biscuits, cereal products,
chocolate, cocao fruits, cornflour, diary products, fish
meal. Hour, linseed oil-cake, maize, meat products, nuts,
oil seed, potato products, semolina, sugar, wheat, and even
salt (Downing 1985; Pearman 1929, 1942). They are also
often associated with packing materials (Society of Food
Hygiene Technology, hereafter abbreviated as SFHT
1983), a factor which may have contributed to the wide-
spread distribution of domestic species. Psocids tend to
thrive and swarm in unused rooms where humidity and
temperature are high and lighting poor. Populations have
been reported to increase in heated buildings (Mockford
1991), and Spieksma & Smit (1975) have shown that L.
bostrychophilus remains are a common component of dust
in centrally heated homes.
Besides causing damage by feeding, they are a nui-
sance if present in large numbers and may contaminate,
directly or indirectly, foodstuff with which they come into
contact. In 1981 the SFHT held a symposium at which
the problems created by psocids for the food industry were
discussed (Downing 1985). The three most important psocid
pests reported by the SFHT (1983) are Trogium pulsato-
rium, Lepinotus patruelis and Liposcelis bostrychophilus.
However, whereas Trogium and Lepinotus tend to be as-
sociated with manufacturing premises and pallets, Liposcelis
is usually the source of consumer complaints (Downing
1985). All three are of widespread occurrence in houses.
Liposcelis bostrychophilus (which is brownish in colour)
and Trogium pulsatorium (large, pale and whitish in col-
our) are both important pests in museums (Edward et al.
1980), and Broadhead (1950) report Liposcelis entomo-
philus (Enderlein), L. liparus Broadhead, L. kidderi (Hagen)
and L. terricolis Badonnel as infesting both insect collections
and herbaria. As demonstrated by the infestation at the Natal
Herbarium in 1986, L. bostrychophilus can be added to
Broadhead’s list.
It should also be noted that most psocids are not pests.
In fact, most of them play a vital role by making micro-or-
ganic debris and microtlora available to the lower rungs of
the food chain (Smithers 1985). Even psocids associated with
human habitations may play a useful role in checking fungal
growth in dark, damp places (Pearman 1928).
FIGURE 1. — Liposcelis bostrychophilus. Dorsal view, x 113. Illustra-
tion by Heather Borchers.
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
249
FIGURE 2. — SEM micrographs of Liposcelis bostrychophilus. A, dorsal view of whole insect, x 4.6; B, side view of whole head, note small group
of seven ommatidia and swollen postclypeus, x 202; C, mouthparts, x 213; D, close up of mouthparts, note strong, rod-like laciniae, x 352.
Liposcelis bostrychophilus Badonnel
Liposcelis bostrychophilus was described by Badonnel in
1931. However, it has also been widely recorded as L. divi-
natorius (Muller) non Pearman, L. divergens Badonnel, and
L. granicola Broadhead & Hobby (the latter two now re-
garded as synonyms of L. bostrychophilus). Broadhead
(1950) presumed that the species probably originated in Af-
rica and was later introduced into Europe; today it is cos-
mopolitan. It forms a species complex with L. corrodens and
non-specialists may find these species difficult to tell apart.
Description
Liposcelis bostrychophilus is a minute insect, 1.0- 1.5
(-2.0) mm long. It has a soft, semi-transparent, dull brown
body sparsely covered with short hairs (Figures 1, 2). The
head is large and mobile and the neck is relatively narrow
(Figure 2A). The compound eyes are reduced to groups
of seven small ommatidia restricted to the side of the head
(Figure 2B). The mouthparts comprise a pair of strong
rod-like organs, the laciniae, which are furnished with
three teeth at the end (Figure 2C, D). The antennae are
long and thread-like. Wings are absent but the insect is
capable of surprisingly rapid movement for its small size.
The legs are short with a thickened hind femur which has
a blunt tooth-like projection on the front margin (Broad-
head 1950; Gurney 1950; Von Keler 1953; Spieksma &
Smit 1975; SFHT 1983; Mockford 1991).
Life cycle
On average about 100 sticky eggs, each more or less
one third of the length of the female, are laid over a ±
250
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
five month period. One female was recorded to have laid
as many as 122 eggs during her life span (Spieksma &
Smit 1975). The eggs, usually laid singly in cracks or on
dusty surfaces, are smooth and bluish white or pearly col-
oured, but become dull as development proceeds. Under
ideal conditions they take 10 days to hatch. The nymphs
hatch from the egg by means of a saw-like egg-buster
(Hickin 1985). These nymphs resemble the adult stage
except that they are more fragile in appearance, paler in
colour, and various body segment parts may vary in
number with each instar. There are four nymphal instars,
lasting 12-15 days in total, before the adult stage is
reached. Within 2 to 3 days of reaching maturity, females
start producing eggs. Adults may live for 150-175 days,
sometimes less, and egg-laying takes place irregularly.
There may be two to eight generations per year, depending
on environmental conditions and food availability. No
males are produced, reproduction taking place without the
need for fertilization, i.e. by parthenogenesis. Under un-
favourable conditions development is slower and the life
cycle takes longer (Broadhead 1950; Gurney 1950; Spiek-
sma & Smit 1975; SFHT 1983; Hickin 1985).
Factors affecting the life cycle
Temperatures of 25°C and a relative humidity of 75%
present ideal conditions for L. bostrychophilus. The spe-
cies is affected detrimentally by lower temperatures and
humidity, but specimens have been known to survive short
periods of freezing (Downing 1985). In cold buildings the
insect may overwinter in the egg stage, but under warmer
conditions such hibernation does not occur. Spieksma &
Smit (1975) have shown that populations increase with
increasing temperature and humidity. Their results show
that (at the ideal humidity level) populations increase by
500% at a temperature of 2 1 °C and by as much as 2000%
at 27°C. Spieksma & Smit (1975) found no population
increase at humidities below 40-50%, only slow growth
at 50-60%, and rapid increases at 70-80%. Above 80%
humidity, moulds become abundant on food sources and
help to increase the populations of the insect even more
dramatically. The results of Spieksma & Smit (1975) ap-
parently match those of Kniille & Spadafora (1969) who
found the critical equilibrium humidity for L. bostrycho-
philus to be 60% relative humidity at 25°C. Critical equi-
librium humidity is that level of humidity where it is
possible for the insect to absorb moisture directly from
the surrounding air; below this critical level the insect will
tend to loose moisture and eventually die. Thus, under the
right conditions of temperature and humidity, populations
can experience an exponential growth. Such population
explosions are no doubt helped by the fact that this species
has a totally parthenogenic life cycle (Downing 1985).
L. bostrychophilus is negatively phototactic, moving
away from the light into the dark. However, Spieksma &
Smit (1975) have shown that the inhibiting effects of ex-
posure to light on laboratory populations are minimal. Al-
though this may be true under ideal conditions, it is
unknown whether light may have a greater impact on
population growth if environmental conditions are unfa-
vourable and food resources limited. Spieksma & Smit
(1975) have also shown that yeasts, if present with other
food sources, accelerate population growth.
Damage
Although feeding primarily on microscopic flora, par-
ticularly fungi (including naturally occurring yeasts),
these insects may also eat and damage other organic mat-
ter, including organically produced glues and pastes used
for binding books or mounting specimens. They also tend
to damage paper that has become damp and mouldy. Of
more importance to curators, herbarium specimens them-
selves (not just their mounting boards) may be attacked,
causing a fine powder to be scattered around the eaten
and therefore damaged plant organ. Such damage may be
inflicted on a wide range of dried plant specimens, but is
usually confined to delicate flowers, such as those of Wah-
lenbergia (Figure 3A, B), although on rare occasions.
B
FIGURE 3. — A. B, herbarium speci-
mens of Wahlenbergia spp.
showing Liposcelis bostrycho-
philus damage. Note the debris
(mostly faecal) surrounding
partially eaten flowers.
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
251
woody structures may also be damaged, such as Maytenus
stems. Unfortunately, psocids are usually only spotted
when populations are high and damage already advanced.
When infected herbarium boards are exposed to bright
light they display a mass of tiny, pale brown bodies fran-
tically dashing for shelter. If squashed, these insects will
stain paper, including herbarium sheets. This staining of
paper is particularly distressing to curators of valuable ar-
chival material, especially books and old manuscripts.
Control and eradication
If possible, non-toxic methods of control and eradica-
tion should be used; however, if infestations are epidemic
and serious damage is being incurred, there may be no
alternative but to use pesticides or fumigants. After col-
lection in the field, plant specimens should be dried as
quickly as possible to prevent the growth of fungal my-
celia or yeasts on and within the specimen; the presence
of these microfungi will only encourage psocid infesta-
tions. Sterile-entry techniques should be practiced, with
herbarium collections being sealed off from the outside
environment as much as possible. This must include non-
herbarium rooms or offices near or adjacent to the her-
barium itself. Before being transferred directly to the
sealed building housing the collections, specimens should
be frozen at temperatures below -8°C for 48 hours in a
building separated spatially from the herbarium (Forman
& Bridson 1989). Other physical methods of pest control
(such as heating in a microwave oven ) may also be prac-
tised as part of a sterile-entry procedure (Stansfield 1989).
However, all these physical methods affect plant speci-
mens in undesirable ways (some albeit more than others)
and so decrease their scientific value. An alternative to
physical sterilization is chemical sterilization. Suitable
chemicals are, however, all poisonous and care has to be
taken when using them. Forman & Bridson (1989) list
and discuss some of the more common treatments pres-
ently used by herbaria. Unfortunately, these chemical
methods may also damage plant specimens. Herbaria
should therefore decide how their collections are to be
used before selecting a suitable physical or chemical ster-
ilization technique (some herbaria combine elements of
both). For instance, herbaria in which the removal and
growth of spores or seeds is important, should definitely
not heat or treat specimens in microwave ovens, even
though this technique does not affect gross pollen structure
(Arens & Traverse 1989). Freezing seems to be the best
of the physical methods of sterilization, although this tech-
nique may affect seed and spore viability and may also
turn incompletely dried succulent plants black and mushy.
Poisons mixed with alcohol or other tetracarbons (mercu-
ric chloride if mixed in alcohol and lauryl pentachlo-
rophenate [LPCP] if mixed with white spirit) may damage
plant microstructures, particularly if these contain lipids.
Such microstructures are often important taxonomic char-
acters and need to be preserved intact. There is also a
chance that very toxic and deeply penetrating poisons
(such as mercuric chloride mixed in alcohol) may kill
spores and seeds. Unfortunately, it is usually these types
of poisons that are most effective for preventing insect
attack.
The extraction ol DNA samples from herbarium speci-
mens (especially extinct species) may soon become rou-
tine and it is not yet known how present sterilization
treatments may affect this important plant component. In
particular, exposure to gamma radiation (used by a few
institutions) may affect the DNA structure of some pressed
plants. Unfortunately, because pests are such a problem
in the tropics, herbaria situated here often have little
choice but to take what they see to be the lesser of a
number of evils. However, such herbaria should be en-
couraged to send pristine (i.e. physically undamaged) du-
plicates to temperate herbaria where they may be useful
to systematic and conservation researchers.
The one major weak link in the life cycle of L. bos-
trychophilus is its intolerance to low humidity. If the hu-
midity of a building can be maintained below 50%,
infestations of this pest should not occur. This may ne-
cessitate the installation of air-conditioning in herbaria that
suffer repeated plagues of this insect. Herbaria unable to
install air-conditioning, or in which the air-conditioning
is proving ineffective in maintaining the humidity below
50%, may try putting a desiccant, such as silica gel, inside
the herbarium cupboards. Silica gel removes moisture
from the air and, being non-toxic, is people-friendly. Un-
fortunately, silica gel needs to be replaced or dried every
three months (shorter intervals may be needed in very
humid localities) if it is to remain effective. This procedure
is therefore labour-intensive and costly. Another advantage
of keeping the humidity low is that it helps to eradicate
other insect pests, including the more commonly encoun-
tered cigarette beetle.
Some publications advocate humidity control in con-
junction with fumigants or insecticides (Downing 1985;
SFHT 1983), and such combination treatments may be
needed in tropical situations where infestations can cause
irreparable, costly damage if not checked. However, her-
barium curators should be aware that poisons, by their
very nature, are potentially harmful to man; some may
cause allergies, illness and even death if not administrated
properly. If in doubt, experts should be hired to apply or
administer fumigants and pesticides that are extremely
toxic (see Bot et al. 1987; Stommel 1991). Localized in-
festations can be controlled or exterminated using com-
mercially available dry sprays that do not mark or damage
herbarium specimens (Retief & Nicholas 1988).
Resin blocks impregnated with dichlorvos have also
been used to eradicate infestations, the insecticide being
slowly released into the atmosphere over a three month
period. Most of the arguments against the use of dichlor-
vos are based on anecdotal accounts (Bartle 1991) which
tend to appear in the popular rather than scientific press
(Sapa-Reuter Washington 1988). The substance was used
in a wide range of household insect sprays in southern
Africa (Central Standardization Committee 1978). Di-
chlorvos is an organophosphate that inhibits the function-
ing of nerve-related enzymes. It is therefore a poison and
should be handled sparingly and with caution. Fumigants
or foggers containing dichlorvos are a fairly effective and
cheap way to eradicate or control infestations; this makes
them attractive to herbaria with limited finances, which
are unable to afford more costly treatments. In some coun-
tries dichlorvos foggers are readily available and may be
252
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
purchased in supermarkets.. The poisonous ingredients
take 48 hours to break down and herbarium staff should
not be allowed into fumigated rooms during this period,
also the effects of overexposure to high concentrations
can be extremely serious (De la Vina et al. 1990; Anony-
mous 1991; Baitle 1991).
A double dichlorvos logger fumigation technique
(timed in such a way as to eradicate all stages of the life
cycle of the cigarette beetle) was used with some success
at the National Herbarium Pretoria in 1988. The technique
was not costly and, wearing specially designed protective
masks, the staff were able to administer the treatment
themselves. It cannot be emphasized strongly enough that
curators who are unsure of how to administer or apply
poisons of any kind should seek expert help. They should
also be aware of the risks involved and communicate these
to staff that may come into contact with poisonous sub-
stances under working circumstances. Curators concerned
with the welfare of their herbarium staff should see that
they continually receive in-house or out-house education
on all matters concerning herbarium hygiene; especially
where health issues are concerned.
Insect pheromones are probably non-toxic to humans
and are being used more and more as part of an effective
insect pest control programme in some institutions
(Anonymous 1989; Biological Control Systems pamphlet
± 1990a, b). Experiments using a pheromone for the ciga-
rette beetle, Lasioderma serricorne, were initiated at the
National Herbarium Pretoria in 1990. These sex-attrac-
tants (if used in connection with specially designed traps)
may be effective in reducing insect populations but not
in eradicating them. It must be remembered that these
chemicals affect neither the females of the population nor
sexually inactive or immature males. The fact that they
do not eradicate pest populations is their biggest drawback
as effective weapons against infestations; even a minimal
pest population can continue to cause damage and the
potential for disaster remains ever present. The major role
the pheromone traps can play in pest control in herbaria
is to act as an infestation warning device and for moni-
toring the course of such infestation. Usually, infestations
are only noticed by herbarium workers when the numbers
of the pest are already high and damage therefore quite
substantial. Pheromone traps can help detect infestations
before they reach this point and so alert herbarium staff
to the problem at a time when damage can be minimized
and pest populations isolated and destroyed. An insect-
produced chemical holding greater promise than phero-
mones appears to be ecdycin. Apparently this chemical
disrupts moulting, an essential process in the insect life
cycle.
Although Liposcelis bostrychophilus may not cause as
much damage to herbarium specimens as the cigarette
beetle, the presence of this psocid should be seen as a
warning that conditions are ripe for infestation by other,
more destructive insect pests (Hickin 1985). This being
the case, their presence should be viewed by curators with
some concern.
CONCLUSION
The control of herbarium pests is of primary concern
to all herbarium curators, especially in tropical regions of
the world where ideal conditions for pest infestations oc-
cur. Hot, humid areas, such as those found along many
tropical and semitropical coastlines, are ideal for the
growth of the psocid Liposcelis bostrychophilus. Under
ideal conditions in tropical herbaria, populations of these
wingless, parthenogenic insect pests can build up very
rapidly and so cause damage to books, specimens and
herbarium packaging. Sterile-entry techniques, coupled
with a controlled humidity lower than 50%, will generally
eradicate or prevent infestations by these particular insects
and should, therefore, be tried in preference to application
of toxins. However, persistent infestations or those reach-
ing epidemic proportions may call for sterile-entry and/or
low humidity conditions, coupled with a fumigation or
with the application of pesticides, if irreparable damage
is to be prevented.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to thank Mr R. Oberprieler
(Plant Protection Research Institute, Pretoria), Dr C. Lien-
hard (Museum d'Histoire Naturelle, Geneve), Mr A.
Ngwenya (Natal Herbarium, Durban) and the library of
the Entomology Department of The Natural History Mu-
seum, London, for assistance given with the preparation
of this paper. Our thanks also go to Dr S.M. Perold, Mrs
A. Romanowski (National Botanical Institute, Pretoria),
Ms H. Borchers (Botany Department, University of Dur-
ban-Westville) Mr. A. Rajh (Photographic Unit, Faculty
of Science, University of Durban-Westville) for help given
with the SEM work, photographs and illustrations.
REFERENCES
ANONYMOUS. 1989. Botany Department fumigation. Herbarium Paci-
ficum News: 5
ANONYMOUS. 1991. Pernicious pesticides: in brief. New Scientist
1780: 12
ARENS, N.C. & TRAVERSE, A. 1989. The effect of microwave oven-
drying on the integrity of spore and pollen exines in herbarium
specimens. Taxon 38: 394-403.
BADONNEL, A. 1931. 4e Note: Copeognathes. In Contribution a P etude
de la faune du Mozambique. Vogare de M.P. Lesne ( 1928-1929).
Annales des Sciences Naturelles Zoologie el Biologie Animate 10:
229-260.
BARTLE, H. 1991. Quiet sufferers of the silent spring. New Scientist
1769: 30-35.
BIOLOGICAL CONTROL SYSTEMS PAMPHLET ± 1990a. The latest
in pest monitoring and control systems based on controlled re-
lease of pheromones and other behaviour-modifying chemicals.
Biological Control Systems, Pontypridd.
BIOLOGICAL CONTROL SYSTEMS PAMPHLET ± 1990b. Insect
traps for stored products. English version. Biological Control
Systems, Pontypridd.
BOT, J„ SWEET, S. & HOLLINGS, N. 1987. A guide to the use of
pesticides and fungicides in the Republic of South Africa: 1-301 .
Plant Protection Research Institute. Pretoria.
BROADHEAD, E. 1950. A revision of the genus Liposcelis Motschulsky
with notes on the position of this genus in the order Corrodentia
and on the variability of ten Liposcelis species. Transactions of
the Royal Entomological Society of London 101: 13-388.
CENTRAL STANDARDIZATION COMMITTEE 1978. Specification
for insecticidal fumigant devices containing dichlorvos (house-
hold use). CKS 512-1978: 1-3. South African Bureau of Stand-
ards, Pretoria.
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
253
DE LA VINA C.B., RAMIREZ, D.A. & ENGLE. L.M. 1990. Effects of
carbamate and organophosphate insecticides on human chromo-
somes. The Philippine Agriculturist 73: 143-152.
DOWNING, F.S. 1985. The Society of Food Hygiene Technology survey
ofbooklouse problems affecting the UK and Irish food industries:
1-23. The Society of Food Hygiene Technology, Potters Bar.
EDWARD, S.R., BELL, B.M. & KING, M.E. (eds) 1980. Pest control in
museums: a status report. The Association of Systematics Collec-
tions, USA.
FORMAN, L. & BRIDSON, D. 1989. Pests and treatments. The Herbar-
ium Handbook: 13-19. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
GURNEY, A.B. 1950. Psocids likely to be encountered by pest control
operators. Report by National Pest Control Association: 131-163.
Pest Control Technology, Entomological Section, New York.
HICKIN, N. 1985. Psocoptera. Bookworms: 54—59. Sheppard Press, Lon-
don.
KNULLE, W. & SPADAFORA, R.R. 1969. Water vapour sorption and
humidity relationships in Liposcelis (Insecta: Psocoptera). Jour-
nal of Stored Produce Research 5: 49-55.
MOCKFORD, E.L. 1991. Psocids (Psocoptera). In Insect and mite pests
in food, an illustrated key 2: 371—402.
PEARMAN, J.V. 1928. Biological observations on British Psocoptera.
The Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 64: 263-268.
PEARMAN, J.V. 1929. New species of Psocoptera from warehouses. The
Entomologist 's Monthly Magazine 65 : 1 04— 1 09.
PEARMAN, J.V. 1942. Third note on Psocoptera from warehouses. The
Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 78: 289-292.
RETIEF, E. & NICHOLAS, A. 1988. The cigarette beetle Lasioderma
serricorne (F.) (Coleoptera : Anobiidae): a serious herbarium pest.
Bothalia 18: 97-99.
SAPA-REUTER WASHINGTON (March) 1988. Insecticides harm peo-
ple, pets — claim. Pretoria News.
SMITHERS, C.N. 1967. The Psocoptera of the world (Liposcelis). The
Australian Zoologist 15: 24—28.
SMITHERS, C.N. 1985. Psocoptera. In C.H. Scholtz & E. Holm, Insects
of southern Africa: 99-104. Butterworth, Durban.
SOCIETY OF FOOD HYGIENE TECHNOLOGY (SFHT) 1983. Pam-
phlet on psocid pests. The Wellcome Foundation.
SPIEKSMA, F.T.M. & SMIT, C. 1975. Some ecological and biological
aspects of the booklouse Liposcelis bostrychophilus Badonnel
1931 (Psocoptera). Netherlands Journal of Zoology 25: 219-230.
STANSFIELD. G. 1989. Physical methods of pest control. Journal of
Biological Curation 1: 1—1.
STOMMEL, B.O. (ed.) 1991. PATC institutional, structural pest control
and PATC private core training. Pesticide applicator training
materials: a bibliography: 1 1 1-23 1 .
VON KELER . S. 1953. Staublause. Die Neue Brehm-Bucherei: 1—48.
Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Geest & Portig K.-G., Leipzig.
Bothalia 25,2: 255-264 (1995)
OBITUARIES
WINSOME (BUDDY) BARKER ( 1907-1994)
The death of Winsome Barker (Figure 1) on 27 De-
cember 1994 at Wynberg, Cape, was more than just the
close of a long chapter in the history of Kirstenbosch. It
was — particularly for the Compton Herbarium — the end
of an era. From 1929 when she arrived at Kirstenbosch
to take up the Solly Scholarship until the late 1980’s, when
increasing infirmity prevented her from visiting the her-
barium, her entire life revolved around the collection she
built up with such devotion and diligence. Sadly, so many
years have passed since her retirement in 1972 that now
there are few members of the present staff of the National
Botanical Institute who still remember her or are even
aware of the magnitude of the contribution she made over
a period of 43 years. In short, the story of her life and
work is essentially the history of the founding and early
development of the Compton Herbarium at Kirstenbosch.
Winsome Fanny Barker, the daughter of William
Joseph Barker of Seaham, County Durham and his wife
Beatrice (nee Cusens), was bom at Jamestown in the East-
ern Cape on 23 September 1 907. The family later moved
to East London where her father became senior history
master at Selboume College and subsequently Inspector
of Schools for the Eastern Cape. After matriculating from
East London Girls High School, Winsome proceeded to
Rhodes University College at Grahamstown to take a
B.Sc. in Botany and Zoology, graduating in 1928 with the
highest marks in her class for which she was awarded the
Junior Captain Scott medals in both major subjects. She
declined a University Scholarship to undertake an M.Sc.
in Botany, but instead accepted the Solly Scholarship of-
fered by the newly established National Botanic Gardens
at Kirstenbosch for a young graduate wishing to study the
South African Flora — a much more appealing option to
Winsome’s mind than getting further involved with aca-
demic botany. This was probably the most important de-
cision in her life.
Thus, early in 1929 Miss Barker arrived at Newlands
Station where the Kirstenbosch pony and trap were wait-
ing to transport her down leafy oak-lined lanes to Kir-
stenbosch, then still a rather inaccessible countryfied
destination where she finally disembarked at Pearson
House, the garden's hostel for lady staff members. Apart
from a brief interlude it was to be her home until 1972.
The director. Prof. R H Compton, was away at the time
and so Buddy (as she was known to her friends) found
herself placed under the wing of Louisa Bolus who was
to be her guide and mentor for the two year duration of
the Scholarship. It was a fortuitous start. Mrs Bolus, Cu-
rator of the Bolus Herbarium, then housed at Kirsten-
bosch, was a dedicated, thorough teacher; Miss Barker an
eager receptive student. Buddy received a sound practical
exposure to the current methods of plant taxonomy as
well as a rigorous training in what may best be described
as ‘Bolusian’ methods of herbarium practice and manage-
ment. Field work was not neglected either. Yet again the
potent influence of Louisa Bolus made itself felt. Here
Buddy describes her first serious collecting expedition:
‘It was Mrs Bolus who took me on my first botanical
collecting trip to the North Western Cape, where at Nieu-
woudtville in an exceptionally good season, I saw my first
spring display in all its glory, an unforgettable memory,
which will remain with me always, as being more won-
derful than my wildest dreams could have imagined. The
wealth of species, as well as their beauty astounded me,
and my ambition to be a systematic botanist began to crys-
talise.’
At the conclusion of her scholarship term Buddy was
contracted to work in the herbarium at Kew by the Ben-
tham Trustees and there she further broadened her expe-
rience in herbarium practices for some 2 Vi years between
February 1931 and July 1933.
But Kirstenbosch soon beckoned again and in Septem-
ber 1933 she was offered an appointment as Botanical
Assistant to the Director at a salary of £18 per month.
X
J hm
FIGURE 1 . — Winsome Fanny Barker, photographed in 1973, a year after
her retirement.
256
Bothalia 25.2(1995)
FIGURE 2. — The director’s office in
the nursery at Kirstenbosch,
first home of the Compton
Herbarium 1935-1940. Here
Miss Barker assembled the
first 18 cabinets of specimens
before moving to the present
herbarium building in April
1940. Note the plant press on
the front step.
Although initially only a temporary position it was the
first purely scientific post created by the Trustees of the
National Botanic Gardens. Miss Barker’s duties in the
original words of her letter of appointment: ‘would chiefly
involve work more or less connected with systematics’.
This was indeed to be the case although the circumstances
under which she had to work were rather unusual in that
her salary was paid by the National Botanic Gardens yet
she effectively worked within the precincts of the Bolus
Herbarium contributing material to their collection which
of course belonged to the University of Cape Town. How-
ever, this anomalous situation did not last long. Indeed,
after several years of mounting tension between Prof.
Compton and Mrs Bolus regarding the siting of the Bolus
Herbarium on the Kirstenbosch estate, matters came to a
head in 1934 when the University agreed to Mrs Bolus’
request to re-locate the Bolus Herbarium on their newly
developed campus at Rondebosch. Thus in appointing
Miss Barker, Prof. Compton astutely anticipated the even-
tual removal of the Bolus Herbarium from Kirstenbosch.
Early in 1935 Miss Barker moved from the Bolus Her-
barium to the director’s office in the nursery at Kirsten-
bosch where under Prof. Compton’s supervision she began
to accumulate material for an independent gardens her-
barium (Figure 2). (This historic building which housed
the first cabinets of the gardens herbarium was demol-
ished in March 1995 to make way for a new conserva-
tory.) However, although Compton and Miss Barker
began to build up the Kirstenbosch Herbarium as an
independent collection in 1935, four years passed be-
fore the trustees of the National Botanic Gardens for-
mally resolved, in October 1939, to start a new
herbarium, the Bolus Herbarium having vacated the
herbarium building at Kirstenbosch a year earlier in
May 1938. In addition to Miss Barker’s salary, expen-
diture of a further £350 for the first year was sanctioned
to cover the salaries of other necessary personnel and
the cost of acquiring preliminary equipment.
FIGURE 3. — Winsome Barker exam-
ining specimens in the present
Compton Herbarium building
± 1948.
Bolhalia 25,2(1995)
257
Thus it was that on April Fool’s day 1940, the embryo
18-cabinet National Botanic Gardens herbarium was
moved from the Director’s office into the empty structure
previously occupied by Bolus Herbarium. By the end of
that year a further 14 cabinets of specimens had been
added bringing the total to 32. There had been a great
deal of growth since those humble beginnings in 1935 for
which Buddy Barker was almost entirely responsible.
Recognising this achievement, her salary was raised to
£22 10 shillings as from 1 January 1941 but, more im-
portantly, Prof. Compton informed her of her new respon-
sibilities: ‘it is understood that you will take control of
the work of the herbarium for which you will be respon-
sible to the Director of the Gardens’. The gardens herbar-
ium was now a functional entity with Buddy Barker at
the helm (Figure 3). Under her direction it was about to
enter a long phase of sustained growth despite many dif-
ficult years of financial privation enforced by wartime and
post-war economic stringency. Frugality and thrift were
at all times the watchwords.
At the outset Buddy set exceptionally high standards
with regard to the quality of the material incorporated.
She developed a technique for laying out dissected floral
parts on gummed card, invaluable in the case of fugacious
petaloid monocotyledons and certain succulent groups
such as the Asclepiadaceae. With limitless patience she
assembled complete sets of material for those difficult
groups like the Amaryllidaceae— where leaves, flowers
and fruits are produced at different seasons, until complete
sets of a plant’s life history could be arranged on a her-
barium sheet instead of merely one phase as is so often
the case. All this material had to be carefully labelled and
cultivated in shade houses adjacent to the herbarium.
Some of the horticulturists like Harry Hall worked closely
with her cultivating specimens for which different devel-
opmental stages were needed but more often than not
Buddy found herself in the role of horticulturist, repotting,
spraying, weeding or watering the research collections
herself.
By the mid 1950’s the herbarium had grown to 70 000
sheets, increasing to 110 000 sheets by the time she re-
tired. (Over 10 000 were her own collections made mainly
in the western Cape and Namaqualand.) Practically every
one of these sheets passed through her hands or was sub-
jected to her critical scrutiny at some stage during their
processing while the majority are inscribed in pencil in
her neat distinctive handwriting towards ihe lower right
hand comer.
Probably the most dramatic development that took
place during her curatorship was the transfer of the South
African Museum Herbarium to Kirstenbosch in 1956. This
historically priceless 100 000 sheet herbarium founded in
1825 was offered to Kirstenbosch on permanent loan, pro-
vided the curator. Dr Joyce Lewis and her assistant could
be accommodated on the staff. For practical, archival, and
historical reasons the two herbaria were never merged but
the staff had to be integrated. It was a potentially touchy
situation. The end result was that Buddy Barker remained
Curator and assumed most of the administrative duties
while Joyce Lewis became full time research officer.
However, Buddy always respected Joyce’s association
with the South African Museum Herbarium, and Joyce
continued to curate it as well as draw and refile loans
until her death in 1967.
A steadfast commitment to the goal of building up the
herbarium meant that there was little time available for
research yet despite these constraints she maintained a
strong interest in the Amaryllidaceae and Liliaceae (sens,
lat.) especially Lachenalia on which she published exten-
sively. Regrettably, Buddy never completed her long
awaited revision of the genus. All her publications were
illustrated with her own drawings. Through the influence
of her mother (who was herself an accomplished artist),
Winsome was encouraged to draw and paint from early
childhood. By the time she had graduated from University,
she had developed into a skilled botanical illustrator. At
least 35 of her colour plates were published in The Flow-
ering Plants of South Africa between 1930 and 1938. The
Royal Horticultural Society in London acquired a fine set
of her watercolours depicting different forms and vari-
ations of Agapanthus. Some of these were used to illus-
trate Frances M. Leighton’s The genus Agapanthus L’
Heritier' (Journal of South African Botany Suppl. Vol. 4,
1965). By far the largest collection of her work (now held
in the Compton Herbarium at Kirstenbosch), is a portfolio
of 107 as yet unpublished colour plates of Lachenalia ,
painted between 1930 and about 1950 to illustrate a
planned revision of the genus (Figure 4).
As if developing and running the herbarium, providing
an identification service, publishing papers and preparing
botanical illustrations were not enough. Buddy also found
herself responsible for training the Solly Scholars. In all,
twelve young graduates enjoyed the benefit of the same
exhaustive training in herbarium work that she herself had
received. Eventually however, inflation so diminished the
value of the scholarship that it lapsed into a state of dor-
mancy. Nevertheless, in its heyday, its influence was con-
siderable and many ex-Solly scholars who were trained
under Buddy came to hold key positions in herbaria
throughout South Africa.
I first met Buddy in June 1958 when, as a schoolboy,
I brought a few plants to the herbarium which I had
not been able to identify myself. Well do I remember
the courtesy with which she received me, the help I
was given and the thrill of handling the herbarium
sheets. I remember too being struck by the quiet, schol-
arly, almost monastic atmosphere of the old building
set on a hillside above the garden, in dense natural fyn-
bos alive with sugarbirds, bulbuls and white-eyes. It
seemed to me to be a very desirable place to work. The
whole establishment had its own distinctive atmosphere
which mirrored her own temperament — disciplined and
orderly. Buddy was a modest self-effacing person who
eschewed the limelight and was never happier than
when she was getting on with the job she did so well.
Her natural restraint sometimes made her appear
slightly aloof to strangers yet few realised this was
merely a mask that hid a shy sensitive personality.
There were undoubtedly times when she felt frustrated
that she had not managed to do more research, yet she
found great fulfillment in developing the collection,
which became the Compton Herbarium, from its very
inception into a viable institution, thereby laying the
foundations for future research in plant systematics at
258
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
FIGURE 4. — Lachenalia rubida Jacq.
painted by Winsome Barker in
1930. This is one of a collec-
tion of 107 of her colour plates
of Lachenalia.
Kirstenbosch. It was an outstanding achievement in
anyone’s terms for which she will be remembered
and honoured as one of the National Botanical Insti-
tute’s great pioneers. Her name is commemorated in
several South African plants, among them Leucadendron
barkerae I. Williams, Haemanthus barkerae Snijman,
Lachenalia barkeriana U. Miill.-Doblies and Romulea
barkerae M.P. de Vos.
PUBLICATIONS BY W.F. BARKER
BARKER, W.F. 1929. Haworthia. Journal of the Botanical Society of
South Africa 15: 22-24.
-1930a. Cotyledon schaeferiana. The Flowering Plants of South Africa
10: t. 394.
-1930b. Cotyledon pygmaea. The Flowering Plants of South Africa 10: t.
396.
-1930c. Strumaria watermeyeri. The Flowering Plants of South Africa
10: t. 398.
-1930d. Lachenalia muirii. South African Gardening and Country Life
20: 14.
-I930e. Lachenalia comptonii. South African Gardening and Country
Life 20: 14.
1 930f. Lachenalia. Journal of the Botanical Society of South Africa 16:
10-13.
-1931a. Lachenalia ovatifolia. The Flowering Plants of South Africa 11:
t. 401.
-1931b. Hessea inatliewsii. The Flowering Plants of South Africa 11: t.
404.
-1931c. Polyxena maughanii. The Flowering Plants of South Africa 11: t.
420.'
- 1 93 1 d. Lachenalia mathewsii. The Flowering Plants of South Africa 1 1 :
t. 422.
— 1 93 1 e. Masson ia holusiae. The Flowering Plants of South Africa 1 1: t.
429.
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
259
- 1 93 1 f. Lachenalia undulata. The Flowering Plants of South Africa lit
431.
-1931g. Cotyledon herrei. South African Gardening and Country Life 2T
247.
-1932. Nerine krigei. South African Gardening and Country Life 22: 1 37.
-1933a. Lachenalia salteri. The Flowering Plants of South Africa 13' t
505.
-1933b. Lachenalia gillettii. The Flowering Plants of South Africa 13: t
506.
-1933c. Lachenalia comptonii. The Flowering Plants of South Africa 13:
t. 507.
-1933d. Lachenalia elegans. The Flowering Plants of South Africa 13: t.
508.
-1933e. Nerine falcata. The Flowering Plants of South Africa 1 3: t. 5 1 1 .
-1933f. Freesia middlemostii n. sp. South African Gardening and Coun-
try Life 23: 112.
-1935a. Nerine flexuosa. The Flowering Plants of South Africa 1 5: t. 56 1 .
-1935b. Nerine peersii. The Flowering Plants of South Africa 15: t. 562.
-1935c. Nerine aha. The Flowering Plants of South Africa 15: t. 563.
-1935d. Nerine humilis. The Flowering Plants of South Africa 15: t. 564.
-1935e. Nerine tulbaghensis. The Flowering Plants of South Africa 15: t.
565.
-19351. Nerine breachiae. The Flowering Plants of South Africa 15: t.
566.
-1 935g. Nerine krigei. The Flowering Plants of South Africa 15: t. 567.
-1935h. Nerine filifolia var. parviflora. The Flowering Plants of South
Africa 15: t. 568.
— 1 935i. Nerine filamentosa. The Flowering Plants of South Africa 15: t.
569.
— 1 935j. Nerine masoniorum. The Flowering Plants of South Africa 15: t.
570.
-1936. Amphisiphon, a new genus of Liliaceae. Journal of South African
Botany 2 19-23.
-1938a. Geissorhiza namaquensis. The Flowering Plants of South Africa
18: t. 688.
-1938b. Cotyledon hirtifolium. The Flowering Plants of South Africa 18:
t. 690.
-1940a. The South African genera of the Haemodoraceae. Journal of the
Botanical Society of South Africa 26: 6-8.
ALAN PERCY-LANCASTER (1944-1995)
Alan Percy-Lancaster passed away on Saturday 3 June
1995. Lie had a heart attack whilst tending his garden in
Pietersburg in the Northern Province, South Africa. Thus,
southern African botany, and in particular those of us in-
terested in succulent plants, lost a friend and indefatigable
collector and field naturalist (Figure 5).
Alan was born in New Delhi, India, on 19 June 1944
and spent his early years in India. His deep love for
and appreciation of plants in general undoubtedly sterns
from the fact that his father, grandfather and great
grandfather were all professional horticulturists (Khoshoo
1966). The young Alan accompanied his parents to South
Africa where they immigrated in 1956. Finding it difficult
to secure employment, they eventually settled in Zim-
babwe, then Southern Rhodesia, in 1958. Here he received
his secondary school training at the Ellis Robins High
School in Salisbury (now Harare), after which he com-
pleted a three year contract with the British South Africa
Police in 1965. He then joined the Government Veterinary
-1940b. The genus Dilatris Berg. Journal of South African Botany 6:
148-164.
-1 949. Gastrodia sesamoides R. Br. Journal of South African Botany. 1 5
1 13, 1 14.-1950. Lachenalia and Haemodoraceae. In R.S. Adam-
son & T.M. Salter, Flora of the Cape Peninsula: 198-202,
205-208.
-1963a. Two new species of Amaryllidaceae. Journal of South African
Botany 29: 163-166.
-1963b. A new species of Penaeaceae. Journal of South African Botany
29: 167-169.
-1966. The rediscovery of two South African plants and the renaming of
another. Botaniska Notiser 119: 201-208.
-1969. A new combination in Lachenalia. Journal of South African
Botany 35: 321,322.
-1 972. Lachenalia viridiflora Barker. Journal of South African Botany
38: 179-183.
-1978. Ten new species of Lachenalia (Liliaceae). Journal of South
African Botany 44: 391-418.
-1979a. Lachenalia viridiflora. The Flowering Plants of Africa 45: t.
1794.
-1979b. Ten more species of Lachenalia (Liliaceae). Journal of South
African Botany 45: 193-219.
-1980. Lachenalia trichophylla. The Flowering Plants of Africa 46: t.
1808.
-1983. A list of Lachenalia species included in Rudolf Schlechter's
collections made in 1891-1898 on his collecting trips in southern
Africa with identifications added. Journal of South African Bot-
any 49: 45-55
-1 984. Three more species of Lachenalia and one new variety of an early
species (Liliaceae). Journal of South African Botany 50: 535-547.
-1987. Five more species of Lachenalia (Liliaceae-Hyacinthoideae), four
from the Cape Province and one from southern South West Af-
rica/Namibia. South African Journal of Botany 53: 166-172.
-1989. New taxa and nomenclatural changes in Lachenalia (Liliaceae-
Hyacinthaceae) from the Cape Province. South African Journal of
Botany 55: 630-646.
J.P. ROURKE*
* Compton Herbarium, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X7,
Claremont 7735.
Department and spent the next nine years at various sta-
tions in Zimbabwe. In 1974 he moved to South Africa
and settled in Gravelotte in the eastern Transvaal Lowveld.
He subsequently resided in Tzaneen, and at his untimely
death lived in Pietersburg, where he was self-employed.
Alan was initially interested in exotic orchids and hy-
brids of Amaryllis L. (Kimberley 1989). One wonders
whether this interest was stimulated by his grandfather who
was a noted hybridiser of Amaryllis and other genera
(Khoshoo 1966). However, during his career with the Gov-
ernment Veterinary Department in Zimbabwe, particularly
while stationed at Melsetter (now Chimanimani) and Chip-
inga (Kimberley 1982), Alan’s interest was extended to the
genus Aloe L„ and indigenous orchids. In 1970 he joined
the Aloe, Cactus and Succulent Society of Zimbabwe and
thereby started a long involvement in succulent plant col-
lecting and field observations. His numerous field trips
soon led to the discovery of new localities for known spe-
cies (e.g. Euphorbia halipedicola L.C. Leach and Poly-
260
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
F1GURE5. — Alan Percy-Lancaster (19 June 1944-3 June 1995). Photo-
graph taken ± 1988.
stachya golungensis Rchb. f.), a trend that continued after
his emigration to what was then the Transvaal Province of
FRIEDRICH VON BREITENBACH OMS ( 1 916-1995)
The study of trees in southern Africa suffered a griev-
ous loss on 21 June 1995 when Dr Friedrich von Breiten-
bach (Figure 6) was killed in a motor accident in Pretoria.
‘Oom Boom’ was in every way a larger-than-life charac-
ter, and those who met him are unlikely to forget the ex-
perience. The one overriding characteristic which impressed
all those who knew him was his enthusiasm for all that he
tackled. He possessed a thorough knowledge of dendrology,
and was conversant with numerous other disciplines.
‘Fried’ von Breitenbach was bom in Konigsberg, East
Prussia (then part of Germany, now Kaliningrad, Russia)
on I August 1916. He was an only child, and was or-
phaned at the age of two. He was educated first at the
Technische Hochschule, Dresden, 1935-1939, and then at
Konigsberg University, 1939-1943, graduating Dip.
Forstingenieur, Dr.Jur., Dr.rer.nat. He was seconded from
the army as a research officer in the German State Forests,
South Africa. Some of his other collecting achievements
include finding a number of new species of Brachystelma
R. Br„ e.g. B. gemmeum R.A. Dyer, and new species of
Ceropegia L. and Raphionacme Harv., and a new variety
of Euphorbia lydenburgensis Schweick. & Letty.
Alan Percy-Lancaster has collected about 2000 plant
specimens, mostly in Zimbabwe, the Northern Province
of South Africa and the Eastern Transvaal Province, and
has contributed various papers on the genera Aloe and
Euphorbia L. to Excelsa , the journal of the Aloe, Cactus
and Succulent Society of Zimbabwe. His herbarium speci-
mens are in SRGH and PRE. He was also a popular lec-
turer at congresses where he freely shared his vast
knowledge of succulents from Zimbabwe and the northern
territories of South Africa. In his spare time he was work-
ing on the Zimbabwean species of Brachystelma and
Ceropegia , and he was a keen stamp collector. He is com-
memorated in the plant names Pachycymbium lancasteri
Lavranos and Brachystelma lancasteri Boele, both species
of the Asclepiadaceae.
Alan is survived by his wife Anna (nee Menage),
whom he married in 1965, and three daughters, Elayne,
Lies! and Annabel.
REFERENCES
KIMBERLEY, M. J. 1982. Notes on contributors. Excelsa 10: 2, 3.
KIMBERLEY, M. J. 1989. Biographical notes on Aloe 88 congress
lecturers and habitat speakers. Excelsa 14: 2-10.
KHOSFIOO. T. N. 1966. Percy-Lancasters — doyens in Indian horticul-
ture. Indian horticulture April-June.
G.F. SMITH* and H.F. GLEN*
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X 1 0 1 , Pretoria 000 1 .
1939-1945, and worked in Finland and Russia; we are
given to understand that at this time he achieved the un-
usual distinction of escaping twice from the Russian army.
Nevertheless, he later became a research worker at the
University of Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 1946-1949, and then
at Leningrad (now St Petersburg), 1949-1955. He returned
to West Germany and became a Forestry Planning Officer
from 1955-1958. After this he took up the post of Forest
Adviser to the United Nations Economic Commission for
Africa, and subsequently became Director of Forestry in
Ethiopia, 1958-1963.
He came to South Africa in 1963 and was appointed
to the Forest Research Institute as District Forest Officer
in the Western Cape on 16th October of that year. Initially
based at Saasveld, near George, he developed and imple-
mented the first scientific sustainable timber utilisation
programme based on conservation-orientated multiple land
Bothalia 25.2 (1995)
261
use principles. The system he applied to the southern Cape
forests is regarded as one of the best of its kind as applied to
indigenous forest timber in the world (Von dem Bussche 1992).
He later moved to the Forestry Research Institute in Pretoria,
eventually becoming Chief Professional Officer for research
and planning regarding indigenous forests. He conducted
woodland surveys in northern Namibia and carried out eco-
logical surveys of the Natal and Transvaal forests. He also
produced a comprehensive report on nature conservation and
forestry legislation in the former states (homelands) of southern
Africa. He retired at the unusually advanced age of 75, on 3 1
March 1992. After he retired, he continued working without
pay, to complete his reports on indigenous forests (Von Brei-
tenbach 1990b). Reports on several forests, namely Mpesheni,
Engeli, Woodbush, De Hoek, Wolkberg, Steilkop, New Agatha
and Entabeni, were almost ready for press.
His contributions to the literature on the forest and tree
llora of southern Africa and Ethiopia include 1 1 books, some
of which ran to more than one edition in his lifetime, and
numerous scientific and more popular papers (Figure 7). The
more easily accessible of these are listed in the bibliography
appended to this obituary. It is interesting to note that the
Finnish forestry advisers in Namibia have reprinted his book
on Eastern Caprivi trees (Von Breitenbach 1967).
In a series on tree names published in Trees in South
Africa from 1972 to 1976 he took up the tree numbers de-
vised by De Winter et al. (1966) and information from the
FIGURE 6. — Dr Friedrich von Breitenbach OMS, with his Order for
Meritorious Service decoration. Photo: Martin Gibbs.
FORESTRY IIKRBARH
BOSBOU-HERUARIUi
A- iMc-.
AitAyi •
Ale.
Hgte.
Colt.
Vers.
Date
Datum
/. r. /? rv
i .
Herb. No. ^ : •
FIGURE 7. — Dr Von Breitenbach’s handwriting, from a specimen in
PRE. Photo: A. Romanowski.
first edition of The National List of Trees/Die Nasionale
Boomlys by De Winter & Vahrmeijer (1972). He was joint
author with De Winter and Vahrmeijer of the second edition
of The National Tree List which appeared in 1978. The first
edition of the ‘green book’: National list of indigenous
trees/Nasionale lys van inheemse borne compiled by Dr von
Breitenbach and published by the Dendrological Foundation
appealed in November 1986. It was followed by a second
impression in September 1987, a third impression in No-
vember 1988 and a second revised edition in January 1990.
A third edition appeared in April 1995. A ‘yellow book’:
National list of introduced trees/Nasionale lys van ingevoerde
borne, in which about 1000 species are listed and supplied
with numbers prefixed with an ‘X’, appeared in March 1984,
to be followed by three further impressions and a second,
revised edition which was published in 1989.
Dr von Breitenbach not only spread the word by pub-
lications, but also by giving lectures to various profes-
sional and amateur societies (Figure 8), as for example
one to the Tree Society at their 26th Annual General Meet-
ing (Meintjies 1973) on Forests and trees of Ethiopia. He
also served as editorial consultant to several international
and national scientific journals on botany and forestry. He
kept close contact with dendrologists in many other coun-
tries and organized visits to southern Africa by members
of the International Dendrological Society in 1 988 and the
Swiss Dendrological Society in 1992.
Fried and his wife Jutta were elected to the Tree So-
ciety committee at the 1980 Annual General Meeting
(Katz 1980); Fried was elected to the post of vice chair-
man the next year (Higgs 1981), but was not mentioned
at all in later accounts of this society’s meetings. Dr Von
Breitenbach was convinced that it was extremely impor-
tant to involve the South African public in tree and nature
conservation, and he spent an astonishing amount of en-
ergy and time to achieve this goal.
The Dendrological Foundation was established in Pre-
toria in 1979 with himself as chairman and one of the
trustees. The objectives were the promotion, protection
and preservation of trees and tree-dominated ecosystems
by means of education and training, technical services,
scientific research and publications. Membership was re-
262
Bothulia 25,2 (1995)
FIGURE 8. — An English-language class of the Dendrological Society’s
Tree Knowledge Course at their first lecture session. Photo: J. von
Breitenbach.
stricted to persons contributing financially or by voluntary
work as researchers, lecturers, authors, editors etc. The
board of trustees was constituted of eminent conservation-
ists. The Dendrological Foundation was the parent organ-
isation of the Dendrological Society of South Africa,
which was founded in Pretoria in September 1980, with
Dr von Breitenbach as first and only executive President
and his wife as Honorary Secretary /Treasurer. This society
attracted hundreds of members of the public over the years
and claimed to be the fastest growing conservation body
in South Africa. There are now almost 50 branches in
various parts of the country, and even as far afield as
Namibia. It concentrates on both one-day and weekend
field excursions, and presents tree knowledge courses. The
National Register of Big Trees was a product of this so-
ciety, with Dr von Breitenbach as its keeper.
Dr and Mrs von Breitenbach produced Dendron , the
newsletter of the Dendrological Society. This started out
as the Dendrological Foundation Newsletter/Nuusbrief
Dendrologiese Stigting in April 1979, and ran to 31 num-
bers until December 1993. It contained reports on branch
activities and other news of interest not only to members
of the society, but to everyone concerned with trees and
nature conservation. Dr von Breitenbach was editor of the
Journal of Dendrology/Dendrologiese Tydskrif which he
started in 1981. This occasional publication appeared in
13 numbers between then and 1991 . Dr and Mrs von Brei-
tenbach were not only the publishers of this journal; they
wrote the majority of the articles. He took most of the
photographs while she did the line drawings. He often
wrote book reviews, and rarely short notes, under the
pseudonyms ‘F.C. Brideswater' and ‘F.K.M. von West-
phalen’. The latter name is derived from his mother’s (nee
Countess von Westphalen) maiden name. It seems that he
used these pen-names for items which he considered to
be of less scientific value than those to which he attached
his own name. Several lists of common names of trees in
black languages of South Africa appeared in the Journal
of Dendrology. These lists are regarded as lists of standard
names in the languages concerned.
He felt strongly that all aspects of nature conservation
should be co-ordinated and so he was instrumental in the
formation of the South African Nature Federation in 1987.
The idea was to provide a framework in which all non-gov-
emmental organisations which are involved in conservation
or related activities could co-operate. This Federation was to
have held its first congress on 8 July 1995. He was interested
in all inhabitants of forests, animals as well as plants, but
tended to regard herbivores, even those naturally resident in
the forest, as a threat to the trees.
‘Dendroco’, the South African Dendrogenetic Devel-
opment Co-operative Ltd., with Dr von Breitenbach as
its driving force and chairman, was established in
March 1991. This registered primary agricultural co-op-
erative is a self-financing development project which
promotes the planting of indigenous trees by means of
selective propagation and marketing of suitable culti-
vars for urban, agricultural and industrial use. The
scheme involves a number of private tree breeders.
Dr von Breitenbach’s most ambitious project in the line
of publications was the Tree atlas of southern Af-
rica/Boomatlas van Suider-Afrika , the bilingual encyclo-
paedic opus on the ±. 1000 indigenous trees of southern
Africa, with himself and his wife as co-authors. Unfortu-
nately only section I, covering the ferns and gymno-
sperms, has so far appeared. However, we are given to
understand that production of the second volume is quite
far advanced.
He collected relatively few (about 1000) specimens,
mainly in the forests of the Western and Eastern Cape, and
in Namaqualand, Caprivi and Ovambo/Kavango area (Na-
mibia), and from cultivation; these were in SAAS and PRF,
but were transferred to PRE in 1992/1993. He also collected
specimens in Ethiopia; these are housed in Addis Ababa.
He was married to Jutta (nee Hofrichter) on 17 June
1961. She became his lifelong companion and co-worker;
many of his publications are illustrated with her line draw-
ings. They had no children.
In recognition of Dr von Breitenbach's contributions
to forestry, dendrology and environmental conservation,
he was awarded the Order for Meritorious Service on 24
November 1992 by the State President.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are grateful to Mr G. Germishuizen and Dr O.A.
Leistner (NBI) for providing us with some of the informa-
tion used in this obituary. Ms H. Sohnge (Department of
Forestry) made the item by Dr Von dem Bussche available to
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
263
us, and Mrs M.A. Tapson (Forestek, CSIR) gave us valu-
able assistance in preparing the bibliography. Special
thanks are due to Mrs Von Breitenbach for making the
pictures available to us. Drs R.J. Poynton and B. de Winter
read drafts of the manuscript and made helpful sugges-
tions.
REFERENCES
DE WINTER, B„ DE WINTER, M. & KILLICK, D.J.B. 1966. Sixty-six
Transvaal trees. Botanical Research Institute and Transvaal Pro-
vincial Administration, Pretoria.
DE WINTER, B. & VAHRMEIJER, J. 1972. Die Nasionale Boomlys/The
National List of Trees. Van Schaik, Pretoria.
HIGGS, J. 1981. Minutes of the thirty-fourth annual general meeting.
Trees in South Africa 32: 86-9 1 .
KATZ, L. 1980. Minutes of the thirty-third annual general meeting,
chairman's report and memo to auditors. Trees in South Africa 3 1 :
95-100.
MEINTJIES, B. 1973. The twenty-sixth annual general meeting of the
Society. Trees in South Africa 24: 96-101 .
VON DEM BUSSCHE, G. 1992. Forestry bids Dr von Breitenbach
farewell. Forestry News 1/92.
PUBLICATIONS OF FRIEDRICH VON BREITENBACH
This list makes no pretence to completeness. In particular, news items in Dendron and reports of the Big Tree
Register (generally the last item in each number of Journal of Dendrology) have not been included.
'BRIDESWATER, F.C.’ 1985. Review: Bonsai: the complete guide to art
and technique, by P. Lesniewicz. Journal of Dendrology 5: 55, 56.
KELECHA, W.M. & VON BREITENBACH, F. 1961. Savannah affores-
tation. Ethiopian Forestry Review 2: 43-51.
VON BREITENBACH, F. 1956. Forstgeschichte: Ein Abriss der
Entwicklung des Waldes, der Jagd und der Forst- und Holzwirt-
schaft in Mitteleuropa. Roneoed.
- 1960 The indigenous trees of Ethiopia , edn 1. Ethiopian Forestry
Association, Addis Ababa.
- 1961a. Forests and woodlands of Ethiopia — a geobotanical contribution
to the knowledge of the principal plant communities of Ethiopia,
with special regard to forestry. Ethiopian Forestry Review 1:
5-16.
- 1961b. Bamboo — a source of cellulose. Ethiopian Forestry Review 1:
21-23.
- 1961c. Exotic trees in Ethiopia. Ethiopian Forestry Review 2: 19-39.
- 1962. National forestry development planning. Ethiopian Forestry > Re-
view 3/4: 41-68.
- 1963. The indigenous trees of Ethiopia, edn 2. Ethiopian Forestry
Association, Addis Ababa.
- 1965. The indigenous trees of southern Africa (5 vols). Government
Printer, Pretoria.
- [1967]. Eastern Caprivi Trees. Department of Forestry, George.
- 1968. Southern Cape indigenous forest management manual (4 vols).
Department of Forestry, George.
- 1971. Notes on the southern Cape indigenous forests. Trees in South
Africa 23: 30-40.
- 1972. Afrikaanse boomname in die Suid-Kaap. Trees in South Africa 24:
2-14.
- 1973. Pterocarpus angolensis—a monograph. Trees in South Africa 25:
58-80.
- 1974a. Southern Cape forests and trees: a guide. Government Printer,
Pretoria.
- 1974b. A list of tree names ( I ). Trees in South Africa 26: 40-50.
- 1975a. A list of tree names (2). Trees in South Africa 26: 92-103.
- 1975b. Letter to the Editor: Dolf. Trees in South Africa 26: 103, 104.
- 1975c. A list of tree names (3). Trees in South Africa 27: 10-22.
- 1975d. A list of tree names (4). Trees in South Africa 27: 38^-6.
- 1975e. The big baobab of Tsumkwe. Trees in South Africa 27: 47, 48.
- 1975f. Giant aloes. Trees in South Africa 27: 64.
- 1975g. A list of tree names (5). Trees in South Africa 27 : 65-72.
- 1975h. Protea gaguedi on the Okavango. Trees in South Africa 27: 75.
- 1976. A list of tree names (6). Trees in South Africa 27: 92-97.
- 1981a. Die grootbome van die Magalakwin. Journal of Dendrology 1:
1-11.
- 1981b. Standard names of trees in southern Africa, Part I. Journal of
Dendrology 1 : 1 8-30.
- 1981c. Modjadji IV. Journal of Dendrology 1: 30-33.
- 198 Id. Standard names of trees in southern Africa, Part II. Journal of
Dendrology 1 : 84-94.
- 1 98 le. Nasionale Boomlys — hersiening, deel 1. Journal of Dendrology
1:95-105.
- 1 982a. Nasionale Boomlys — verbeteringsvoorstelle, deel 2. Journal of
Dendrology 2: 32^42.
- 1982b. About figs and wasps. Journal of Dendrology 2: 99-120.
- 1982c. Miscellaneous taxonomic notes. Journal of Dendrology 2:
132-141.
- 1982d. Kerkhofsipresse in die bosveld. Journal of Dendrology 2: 153.
- 1982e. Roodeplaat se kremetart. Journal of Dendrology 2: 153, 154.
- 1982f. Mosdene’s baobab. Journal of Dendrology 2: 154.
- 1983a. Whence the name baobab? Journal of Dendrology 3: 54—56.
- 1983b. Karree and wild currant: a review of the arborescent members of
the genus Rhus L. in southern Africa. Journal of Dendrology 3:
99-160.
- 1984a. National list of introduced trees , edn 1. Dendrological Founda-
tion, Pretoria.
- 1984b. Standard names of trees in southern Africa. Part III. Journal of
Dendrology , 4: 33—4 1 .
- 1984c. Die dwelmblaarboom en sy halfbroer. Journal of Dendrology 4:
54-65.
- 1984d. Miscellaneous taxonomic notes. Journal of Dendrology 4:
66-74.
- 1984e. Tierhout-tederhout-teerhout. Journal of Dendrology 4: 75, 76.
- 1 984f. Standard names of trees in southern Africa 4. Journal of Dendrol-
ogy A: 133-141.
- 1984g. Miscellaneous taxonomic notes. Journal of Dendrology 4:
155-171.
- 1985a. Southern Cape tree guide. Department of Environmental Affairs,
Pretoria.
- 1985b. Suid-Kaapse boomgids. Department of Environmental Affairs,
Pretoria.
- 1985c. Notes on the growth rate of planted baobab ( Adansonia digitata)
trees and observations on the lifespan, growth phases and genetic
variation of the species. Journal of Dendrology 5: 1-21.
- 1985d. Acacia goetzei in the Waterberg. Journal of Dendrology 5:
23-30.
264
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
- 1985e. Miscellaneous taxonomic notes. Journal of Dendrology 5:
37^46.
- 1985f. National Register of Big Trees: the first three years. Journal of
Dendrology 5: 57-68.
- 1985g. Funebrial use of indigenous trees. Journal of Dendrology 5:
75-78.
- 1985h. Miscellaneous taxonomic notes. Journal of Dendrology 5:
78-93.
- 1985i. Review: A checklist of the Bora of Budango Forest Reserve,
Uganda, with notes on ecology and phenology, by T.J. Synnott.
South African Forestry Journal 135: 86, 87.
- 1986a. National list of indigenous trees , edn 1. Dendrological Founda-
tion, Pretoria.
- 1986b. Nasionale lys van inheemse borne , edn 1. Dendrological Foun-
dation, Pretoria.
- 1986c. Notes on the arborescent Proteaceae of southern Africa. Journal
of Dendrology 6: 1-45.
- 1986d. Standard names of trees in southern Africa 5. Journal of Den-
drology 6: 46-57.
- 1986e. Die groot trassiedoring van Koufontein. Journal of Dendrology
6: 62-64.
- 1987a. Verslag oor beskermde borne (2 vols). SAFRI, Pretoria.
- 1987b. Review: Natural management of tropical moist forests: silvicul-
ture and management prospects of sustained utilisation, edited by
F. Mergen & J.R. Vincent. South African Forestry Journal 143:
57-59.
- 1989a. National list of introduced trees, edn 2. Dendrological Founda-
tion, Pretoria.
- 1989b. The lost Natal thorn. Journal of Dendrology 12: 1-10.
- 1989c. Standard names of trees in southern Africa 6. Journal of Den-
drology 12: 15-22.
- 1989d. Jakkalskos op enkeldoring. Journal of Dendrology 12: 28.
- 1989e. Cauliflory in Rhus lancea. Journal of Dendrology 12: 29.
- 1989f. Franz Bachmann and Friedrich Wilms. Journal of Dendrology
12: 30,31.
- 1989g. Miscellaneous taxonomic notes. Journal of Dendrology 12:
31-38.
- 1990a. National list of indigenous trees, edn 2. Dendrological Founda-
tion, Pretoria.
- 1990b. Reports on indigenous forests 1. Introduction and methods,
Eastern Transvaal forests, Kaapsehoop forests, Uitsoek forests.
Department of Environmental Affairs, Pretoria.
- 1991a. Groot vadersbosch — aantekeninge oor die geskiedenis, biogeo-
grafie cn bewaringsbestuur. Journal of Dendrology 13: 9-24.
- 1991b. Standard names of trees in southern Africa 7. Journal of Den-
drology 13: 29-35.
- 1991c. Miscellaneous taxonomic notes. Journal of Dendrology 13:
43-46.
- 1995a. National list of indigenous trees, edn 3. Dendrological Founda-
tion, Pretoria.
- 1995b. Nasionale lys van inheemse borne, edn 3. Dendrological Foun-
dation, Pretoria.
VON BREITENBACH, F. & KOUKOL, J. 1962. Menagasha State For-
est. Ethiopian Forest Review 1962(3/4): 17-34.
VON BREITENBACH, F. & VON BREITENBACH, J. 1974. Baobab
flower. Trees in South Africa 26: 10-15.
- 1982. A sacred Venda forest. Journal of Dendrology 2: 149-153.
- 1983. Notes on the natural forests of Transkei. Journal of Dendrology 3:
17-53.
- 1985. Trees of stone. Journal of Dendrology 5: 31-34.
- 1989. A Garcinia livingstonei orchard in Venda. Journal of Dendrology
12: 23-25.
- 1992. Tree atlas of southern Africa, sect. 1. Dendrological Foundation,
Pretoria.
'VON WESTPHALEN, F.K.M.' 1 982. Tree ferns. Journal of Dendrology
2: 142-148.
H.F. GLEN* and W.G. WELMAN*
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001.
Bothalia 25,2: 265-276 ( 1995)
National Botanical Institute South Africa: list of staff and publications,
31st March 1995
Compiler: B.A. MOMBERG
CHIEF DIRECTORATE
CAPE TOWN
Huntley, Prof. B.J. M.Sc. Chief Director
Davidson, D.C. Head: Graphic Services
Mirkin, Ms Y.A. Senior Typist/Receptionist
Ross, Ms S.I. Head: Communication and Promotions
Stafford, Ms D.L. Senior Secretary
COMMUNICATION AND PROMOTIONS— CAPE TOWN
Ross, Mrs S.I. Cert.Comm.Art, B.Fine Art
Coningsby, Ms N.J. B. Journalism (Hons). Communications Officer
GRAPHIC SERVICES— CAPE TOWN
Davidson, D.C. B.A. (Hons.), PRISA Final Dipl.
Loedolff, Mrs J. B.Sc.(Ind.Tech.). Photographer/Illustrator
Sims, W.D. Graphics Assistant
ADMINISTRATION DIRECTORATE
CAPE TOWN
Jordaan, A.W. Adv.Dip.B & A. Director: Personnel and Finance
Comelissen, Mrs A.M. Secretary to the Board
Hughes, W.S.G. Head: Finance
Smuts, Mrs W.E. Head: Administration (Pretoria)
Van Zyl, J.M. Head: Personnel
ADMINISTRATION— PRETORIA
Smuts, Mrs W.E. Head: Administration
Bopape, Mrs M.D. Bookshop Assistant
Gotzel, Mrs A. Senior Telecom. Operator
Joubert, Mrs I.J.M. Senior Administration Clerk
Kama, Mrs P.B. Administration Aid I
Kekana, Mrs M.R. Administration Aid I
Koehne, Mrs R.W.R. Senior Registration Clerk
Letebele, M.M. Groundsman I
Makgobola, Mrs M.R. Administration Aid I
Maphuta, Mrs M.S. Administration Aid I
Martin, Ms M.A. Senior Aministration Clerk
Phaala, M.C. Groundsman I
Tloubatla, J.M. Courier/Photocopy Machine Operator
Venter, W.A. N2(Technical). Supervisor: Office Services
266
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
FINANCE— CAPE TOWN
Hughes, W.S.G. B.Com., C.A.(SA) Deputy Director
Armitage, Mrs C.S. Senior Accountant
Kriel, Ms C.M.M. Senior Accounts Clerk: debtors
Neuwirth, Ms E.V. Accountant: salaries
October, A. Senior Accounts Clerk: salaries
Petersen, R.E. Senior Accounts Clerk: salaries
Roman, D.C. Accounts Clerk: cashier
Simon, Ms P.I. Assistant Accountant: creditors
Traut, G.D. Chief Accounts Clerk: salaries
Yeomen, Ms I.N. Senior Accounts Clerk: creditors
PERSONNEL— CAPE TOWN
Van Zyl, J.M. M.Econ. (Industrial Psychology). Assistant Director. Personnel
Barnard, Mrs A. Chief Telephonist/Receptionist
Crowie, A.C. Courier
Dollie, Mrs N.J. Administration Aid
Eiman, Ms S.M. Typist
Haupt, Ms C.S. Administration Aid
Mulder, Mrs G.P. Senior Typist
Nicholas, Mrs W.L. Photocopy Machine Operator
Oelofse, Ms V.S. Senior Personnel Clerk
Smith, Miss L.G. Chief Typist
Staal, P.B. Senior Personnel Practitioner: labour rela-
tions
Woodman, Ms L.R. Telephonist/Receptionist
EDUCATION & INFORMATION DIRECTORATE
CAPE TOWN
Low, A.B. M.Sc. Deputy Director: Education & Information
Lovric, Mrs N. Typist
Ashwell, Ms A.N. Head: Education
Leistner, O.A. Head: Publications (Pretoria)
EDUCATION
CAPE TOWN
Ashwell, Ms A.N. M.Ed. Assistant Director
Cupido, Ms M. Administrative Assistant
Slattery, Mrs C.M. B. Sc. (Hons.), H.D.E. Education Officer
Thoka, M.D. B.A. Education Officer
WITW ATERSRAND
Molose, Ms l.V. B.A. (Ed.) Education Officer
Van der Westhuizen, Mrs S. M.Sc. Education Officer
INFORMATION— PRETORIA
Joffe, Mrs H. B.Sc. Garden Utilization Officer
PUBLICATIONS— PRETORIA
Leistner, O.A. D.Sc., F.L.S. Assistant Director. Editing
Brink, Mrs S.S. Dip. (Typing). Chief Typesetter. Typeset-
ting, layout, word processing
Du Plcssis, Mrs E. B.Sc. (Hons.), S.E.D. Technical editor.
Editing, translating, layout
Momberg, Mrs B.A. B.Sc. (Entomology & Zoology).
Technical editor. Editing, layout
Mulvenna, Mrs J.M. Dip. (Typing). Principal Typist. Word
processing, typesetting
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
267
GARDENS DIRECTORATE
CAPE TOWN
Botha, D.J. D.Sc. Director: Gardens
Behr, Ms C.M. Curator: Harold Porter NBG
Britz, R.M. Curator: Orange Free State NBG
Carstens, Mrs M.M. Secr.Dip. Senior Secretary
Chaplin, P.J. Curator: Witwatersrand NBG
Engelbrecht, B. Head: Support Services
Heilgendorff, J.P. Curator: Pretoria NBG
Kluge, J.P. Curator: Lowveld NBG
Oliver, I.B. Curator: Karoo NBG
Tarr, B.B. Curator: Natal NBG
Winter, J.H.S. Curator: Kirstenbosch NBG
PLANNING, MAINTENANCE & DEVELOPMENT— CAPE TOWN
Linde, D.C. N.T.C.IIKTechnician and Inspector of Works). M.S.A.I.D. Cert. Estate Agency. Control Works Inspector
Arendse, D.S. Artisan’s Assistant
Manasse, S.P. Dip. (Masonry). Artisan
Peck, W.I. Artisan’s Assistant
HAROLD PORTER NBG— BETTY’S BAY
Behr, Ms C.M. B. Sc. (Hons.). Chief Research Technician
Abrahams, F. Groundsman I
Abrahamse, S.J. General Foreman
Forrester, J.A. N.T.C.IIKHort.). Senior Research Technician
Harper, C.C. Driver
Jacobs, L.H. Groundsman I
Martinka, A.G. Groundsman I
Rex, G. Groundsman I
Rex, P. Groundsman I
Van Coller, A.E. Groundsman I
Visser, C.J.J. Groundsman I
KAROO NBG— WORCESTER
Oliver, I.B. N.D.(Hort.), N.D.(PRA). Chief Research Technician
Dlikilili, N.S. Groundsman II
Kecela, S. Groundsman I
Kumeke, A.M. Groundsman I
Made, M.A. Groundsman I
Madumane, M. Tractor driver
Makubalo, F.N. Nurseryman
Makubalo, J. Groundsman 1
Maquanda, D. Groundsman II
Monisi, M.M. Groundsman I
Mpayipeli, W.W. Groundsman I
Mpeke, Mrs E.N. Groundswoman I
Mtetwa, A.M. General Foreman
Nkoloti, P.M. Groundsman I
Qumba, G.A. Groundsman I
Radebe, M.B. Groundsman II
Sibeko, L.A. Groundsman II
Sibozo, N.E. Driver
Simane, D.K. Senior Foreman
Smit, Mrs A.C. Senior Administration Clerk
Theoha, P.P. Groundsman II
Townsend, D.J. N.D.(Hort.). Senior Research Technician
Tuswa, M.H. Groundsman I
Viljoen, D.M. N.D.fHort.) Senior Research Technician
Yekiso, S.M. Groundsman I
KIRSTENBOSCH NBG— CAPE TOWN
Winter, J.H.S. N.D.(Hort.). Deputy Director
CENTRAL
Berman, R.C. Groundsman I
De Jonge, Miss K. Senior Typist
Engelbrecht, Mrs L.D. Administration Clerk. Plant record-
ing
Ficks, T.E. Driver
Fredericks, Miss N.C.E. Aministration Aid
Geduldt, D.C. Engraver
Goliath, L. Administration Aid. Seed section
Grace, T. Senior Storeman/Senior Admininstration
Haynie, R. Groundsman I. Workshop
Jacobs, A.P. Information Officer
Jacobs, F.H. Storeman
Jacobs, K.C. General Foreman
Jansen, K.J. Driver
Labuschagne, Mrs C.E. B. Sc. (Hons.). Education Officer
Marent, Mrs H.C. Sen. Administration Clerk. Plant recording
268
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
McLean, N.S. Groundsman I. Workshop
Newman, W. Driver. Workshop
Petersen, F.J. Driver
Petersen, V.E.M. Aministration Aid
Trautman, C.E. Artisan/Supervisor. Workshop
Williams,G.C. Groundsman I
Williams, W.P. Senior Foreman. Drivers
Woodward, Ms J. Senior Administration Clerk
GARDEN
Abrahams, A.C. Security
Abrahams, J.E. Groundsman I
Adams, H. Groundsman I. New development
Adonis, A. General Foreman. Ericas
Adonis, J.J.M. Groundsman I. Dell
Anderson, D.L. Security
Arendse, D.P. Groundsman I
August, T. Groundsman I
Balabala, L. Groundsman I. Dell
Beck, G.D. Groundsman I
Boonzaaier, I. Groundsman I. Goldfields EEC
Bowler, M.A. Groundsman I. Annuals
Crowie, R.W. General Foreman. General garden
Cupido, J. Groundsman I
Davids, J. Groundsman 1
De Kock, Mrs. M.E. Groundsman I. Protea development
Hendricks, S. Groundsman I. Proteas
Jacobs, D.R. Groundsman I
Jansen, W. Groundsman I. Annuals
January, C. Groundsman I
Jenkins, A. Groundsman I. Succulents
Josephus, D.N. Groundsman I
Julie, V. Groundsman I
Lewis, N.I. Security
Loft, G.E. Groundsman I. Director & garden
Lukas, K. Groundsman I. General garden
Manuel, D.R. Groundsman I. Annuals
McKlein, M.L. Groundsman I
Mitchells, G. Senior General Foreman. Estate & trails
Morris, J.N.M. Groundsman 1. Proteas
Petersen, A. General Foreman. Cycads
Philander, N. Groundsman I. New development
Philips, R. Groundsman I
Pietersen, J. Groundsman I. New development
Plaatjies, S.D. Groundsman I. Proteas
Prins, F.B. Security
Rudolph, A. Security
Ruiters, M. Groundsman I. New development
Sauls, K. Groundsman I. Annuals
Sampson, R. Groundsman 1. General garden
Smith, A.E. Groundsman I
Solomons, K.J. Groundsman I. Proteas
Solomons, T.C. Security Foreman
Symmonds, R. Scholar
Van der Westhuizen, AJ. General Foreman. Proteas
Van Rooy, K. General Foreman. Annuals
Van Schalkwyk, J. Groundsman I
Van Wyk, F. Groundsman I. Annuals
Van Wyk, N. Groundsman I
Williams, M.L.J. Groundsman I. New development
ESTATE
Le Roux, P.H. Chief Research Technician. Estate Manager
Abrahams, M. Groundsman I. Estate & trails
Adams, J. Groundsman I. Estate & trails
Adonis, S.J. Groundsman I. Aliens
Andrews, M.M. Groundsman I. Estate & trails
Baadjies, I. Groundsman I. Estate & trails
Bezuidenhout, A.K. Groundsman I. General maintenance
Bouwers, G.G. Groundsman I. Construction
Button, J. Groundsman E Estate & trails
Claasen, F. Groundsman I. Aliens
Dollie, Y. Groundsman 1. Estate & trails
Fienies, C. Groundsman I. General maintenance
Geswind, A.J. Groundsman I. Lawnmowers
Grootboom, C.J. Groundsman I
Hendricks, M. Groundsman I
Hope, C. Groundsman I. Construction
Isaacs, M. Groundsman I. Aliens
Jackson, P. Groundsman I. Lawnmowers
Jacobs, M.D. Groundsman I. Estate & trails
Jaftha, R. Groundsman I. General maintenance
Jaftha, W.R. Groundsman I. Construction
Kayster, G.J. General Foreman. Construction
Kuscus, G.W. General Foreman. General maintenance
Mathews, N. Groundsman I. Aliens
Matthews, I.N. General Foreman. Estate & trails
McLean, A. Groundsman I. Aliens
McLean, N. Groundsman I. Aliens
Petersen, J. Groundsman I. Aliens
Petersen, N.H. Groundsman I. Construction
Plaatjies, M.P. Groundsman I. Estate & trails
Reed, T.W. Groundsman I. Estate & trails
Rhode, W.C. Groundsman I. Estate & trails
Sampson, J. General Foreman. Aliens
Solomons, G. Groundsman I. Aliens
Solomons, S. Groundsman 1. Construction
Van Gusling, EJ. General Foreman. Lawnmowers
NURSERY
Powrie, Ms F.J. B.Sc(Hons), N.D.(Hort.). Chief Research Technician. Head: Nursery
Adams, G. Groundsman I. Nursery
Apolis, A. Groundsman I. Succulents
August, C. Groundsman I. Seed room
Brown, B. Groundsman I. Nursery
Carrol, R.R. Groundsman I. Plant utilization
Crous, H.T. Research Technician
Crowie, Mrs U.M. Administration Aid. Seed room
Davids, M.I. General Foreman. Bulbs
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
269
Davids, N. Groundsman I. Plant utilization
Dorfling, Ms. Student
Duncan, G.D. N.D.tHort.). Principal Research Technician
Francis, J. Groundsman I. Nursery
Hitchcock, A.N. N.H.D.(Hort.). Senior Research Techni-
cian
Jacobs, C.W. Groundsman I. Nursery
Jacobs, E.C. Groundsman I. Seed room
Jacobs, H.C. General Foreman. Plant utilization
Jamieson, Mrs H.G. N.D.t Parks & Recreation). Research
Technician
Kettledas, P.G. Groundsman I. Nursery
King, O. Groundsman I. Nursery
Kotze, F.G. N.T.C.IIKHort.). Principal Research Technician
Lawrence, E. Groundsman E Plant utilization
Lewin, T.B. Groundsman I. Nursery
Manuel, I.P. General Foreman. Seed room
Marthinus, E. Groundsman I. Succulents
Matthews, Z. Groundsman I. Plant utilization
Notten, Miss A.L. Senior Research Technician. Seed room
Sardien, T.P. General Foreman. Succulents
Sauls, C.J. Groundsman I. Nursery
Smith, D. Groundsman I. Seed room
Szabo, Mrs B. Research Technician
Tamboer, J.S. General Foreman. Nursery
Van der Walt, Mrs L.E. N.D.tHort.). Research Technician
Van Jaarsveld, E.J. M.Sc., N.D.tHort.). Chief Research
Technician
Van Rooyen, Miss S. Administration Aid. Seed room
Young, B. Student
LOWVELD — NELSPRUIT
Kluge, J.P. B. Sc. (Hons.), T.H.O.D. Chief Research Technician
Froneman, W.C. N.D.tNature Conservation & Management),
N.D.t Parks & Recreation Admin.), N.T.C.III(Hort.).
Principal Research Technician
Hurter, P.J.H. B.Sc. Senior Research Technician
Khoza, D.E. Groundsman I
Khoza, F.D. Groundsman IF Team leader
Khuntalo, N.S. Groundsman I
Khumalo, S.S. Groundsman II. Team leader
Lekhuleni, W. Groundsman 1
Magagula, K.E. Groundsman I
Magagula, N.R. Groundsman I
Mahlahlubane, F.J. Groundsman 1
Makamo, Mrs J.E. Groundswoman I
Makhubela, B.J. Groundsman I
Maqungo, Miss V.L.B. Groundswoman I
Mazibuko, F.E. Groundsman I
Mdhluli, M.B. Groundsman I
Mdluli, L. Groundsman I
Mdluli, M.E. Groundsman II
Mdluli, S. Groundsman I
Mkhatshwa, Mrs N.S. Groundswoman I
Mteto, E.M. Groundsman I
Muswili, K.J. Groundsman II. Team leader
Ndlovu, D. Groundsman I
Ngomane, S. Groundsman I
Ngqani, Mrs L.S. Groundswoman I
Ngwengoma, P.N. Driver
Ngwenya, P.S. Groundsman I
Ngwenyama, K.A. Groundsman I
Nkosi, M.P. Groundsman I
Nkosi, Mrs P.B. Groundswoman I
Nkosi, Mrs S.L. Groundswoman I
Shabangu, M.E. Groundsman II
Shabangu, S.L. Groundsman I
Shabangu, W.N. Groundsman I
Shawa, P. Groundsman 1
Shawe, S.A. General Foreman
Sibule, B.F. Groundsman I
Sibure, W.F. Groundsman I
Sigudla, B.M. Groundsman I
Soka, M.P. Groundsman I
Thabethe, S.S. Groundsman I
Van der Walt, Mrs G.A. Senior Administration Clerk
NATAL NBG— PIETERMARITZBURG
Tarr, B.B. N.D. (Parks & Recreation Admin.), Advanced Dip. (Adult Education).
Chief Research Technician
Busani, M.A. Driver
Dharamraj, N. N.D.tHort.)
Dlamini, N.S. Groundsman I. Nursery Foreman
Dlungwane, R. General Foreman
Gabuza, A. Groundsman I
Gates, Ms J.E. N.D.tHort.), N.D.t Parks & Recreation Admin.),
N.D.t Marketing Management). Principal Horticultur-
ist. Kniphofia, forest spp.
Mbense, A. Groundsman I. Machine operator
Mkize, M. Groundsman I
Mncwabe, Ms A. Groundswoman I
Mncwabe, P. Groundsman I
Mpulo, D.H. Groundsman I
Mthalane, A. Groundsman I
Mtolo, C. Groundsman II. Team leader
Nkabini, A. Groundsman II
Nzakwe, W. Groundsman I
Radebe, A. Groundsman I
Van der Merwe, Ms M.E.H. Senior Administration Clerk
Zimu, J. Groundsman II
Zimu, S. Groundsman I
Zondi, A. Groundsman I
Zondi, Ms B.P. Groundswoman I
Zondo, Z. Groundsman I
Zuma, J. Groundsman I
Zuma, Ms K. Groundswoman I
270
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
ORANGE FREE STATE NBG— BLOEMFONTEIN
Britz, R.M. N.D. (Forestry). Chief Research Technician
Dweba, K.P. Groundsman I. Entrance
Eysele, Mrs J.P. Senior Administration Clerk
Lekhetho, M.J. Groundsman II. Maintenance
Lekhetho, T.S. Groundsman I. Nursery
Lumley, M.J. Principal Research Technician. Nursery
Mabula. S.K. Groundsman I. Maintenance
Mbolekwa, G.M. Groundsman I. Grass garden
Mbolekwa, L.M. Groundsman II. Rhus, display
Mohokare, L.J. Driver
Moima, T.J. Groundsman I. Braai area, maintenance
Mopeli, M.J. Groundsman I. Bulb area
Moticoe, Mrs M.A. Groundswoman I. Nursery
Mpeli, P.A. Groundsman I. Nursery
Nakanyane, R.B. General Foreman
Nakedi, N.J. Groundsman I. Maintenance
Olifant, D.M. Groundsman I. Kiosk area
Raditlhare, Mrs E.M. Groundswoman I. Offices & nursery
Sebolai, Mrs C.L. Groundswoman I. Seed room nursery
Sebolai, P.R.A.N. Groundsman II. Tools maintenance
Semenyane, T.D. Groundsman I. Maintenance
Thaele, Mrs M.E. Food services Aid I
PRETORIA NBG
Heilgendorff, J.P. N.H.D.(Hort.). Chief Research Technician
Baloi, R.F. Groundsman I
Baloyi, K.J. Groundsman I
Baloyi, S.J. Driver/Operator
Baloyi, S.M. Records Clerk
Chipi, S. Security Assistant
Chuma, S.J. Security Assistant
Dry, D.H. N.D.(Hort.). Chief Research Technician. PRO and
Groups. Technical papers on horticulture and plants
Kemp, J. Groundsman I
Keyter, B.A. Senior Security Officer
Klapwijk, N.A. N.D.(Hort.), N.D.(Plant Prod.), N.D. (Diesel
Fitting). Chief Research Technician. Planning and de-
velopment, Index Nursery, New Plant Company
Kutama, B.T. Groundsman I
Lephera, .1. Groundsman I
Letsoalo, H.M. Groundsman 1
Mabasa, J.R. Security Assistant
Machika, S.M. Groundsman I
Mahlangu, J.J. Groundsman I
Makafula, W.P. Groundsman I
Makena, M.S. Driver/Operator
Makena, S.N. General Foreman
Makena, T.J. Groundsman I
Makgopo, C.K. Groundsman I
Makhubela, D. General Foreman
Makhubela, K.P. Groundsman I
Makoeng, P.T. Groundsman I
Makola, J. Groundsman I
Makola, L.M. Groundsman II. Tractor driver
Makua, E.G. Groundsman I
Malewa, D. Groundsman I
Malobola, L. Groundsman I
Malobola, M. Groundsman II
Maluleke, M.J. Security
Mamietja, A. Groundsman 1
Mariri, N.J. Factotum
Marule, P.M. Groundsman II. Tractor driver
Masango, M.G. Groundsman I
Malhabathe, D.S. Groundsman I
Matlala, S.M. Groundsman I
Matshika, S.P. Groundsman I
Mdluli, S. Artisan
Mmakujwana, K.J. Groundsman I
Mnyangeni, L.D. Groundsman I
Modisha, D.M. Groundsman I
Mogoru, M.F. Groundsman I
Mogoru, S. Groundsman I
Mohale, F.R. General Foreman
Mohale, J.N. Groundsman I
Mokawe, N.R. Groundsman I
Molefe, J.R. Groundsman II
Molokomme, J. Groundsman I
Molomo, S.E. Groundsman I
Mononyane, J.B. Groundsman I
Motshweni, V.V. Groundsman I
Mudau, R.T. Groundsman I
Muhali, B. Groundsman I
Nkambule, J. Groundsman I
Nkoane, J.M. Groundsman I
Nkwana, F.N. Driver/Operator
Noko, J.M. Research Assistant
Noku. A.Y. Groundsman II. Tractor driver
Ramakgaphola, A.M. Groundsman I
Ramatsetse, P.M. Security Assistant
Rampopana, A.M. Groundsman I
Sete, L. General Foreman
Shirindi, J.R. Groundsman I
Shirindi, S.M. Groundsman I
Shilubane, E. Storeman Assistant
Sithole, J. Groundsman I
Schnackenberg, Ms H. Senior Provisioning Administra-
tion Clerk
Strydom, D.J.F. N.T.C.HKHort.), N.D.(Parks & Rec.
Management), Chief Research Technician. Mainte-
nance cycads
Swartz, Ms P. M.Sc. Senior Horticulturist. Scientific and
horticultural curation of living collections; garden
development; seedbank of endangered plants and
succulents; Madagascan plants
Tefu, P.R. Groundsman I
Tloubatla, J.L. Groundsman I
Tolo, P.K. Groundsman I
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
271
WITWATERSRAND NBG— WILROPARK
Chaplin. P.J. N.T.C.Dip.(Hort.). Chief Research Technician
Bongwe, N.W. Groundsman 1. Machine operator
Hankey, A.J. N.D.(Hort). Senior Research Techni-
cian
Head, Mrs S.E. Senior Administration Clerk
Khedzi, K.P. Groundsman I. Nursery
Lukhwa, N.A. Groundsman I. Garden
Luvhimbi, T.S. Groundsman I. Garden
Majamane, Z.E. Groundsman I. Garden
Mamosebo, M.A. Groundsman E Garden
Manjati, Mrs N.L. Groundswoman IE Clerical Assistant
Manyikana, T.M. Groundsman I. Garden
Matsea, M.W. Groundsman 1. Garden
Mbulaheni, N.P. Groundsman E Garden
Mulibana, N.S. Groundsman E Machine operator
Mmola, Ms B.E. Groundswoman E Cleaner
Ndou, A.P. Groundsman I. Garden
Ndou, M.W. Groundsman I. Machine operator
Ndwambi, N.W. Groundsman E Garden
Nedambale, M.P. Groundsman IE Nursery
Nemalili, M.E. Driver
Nemalili, A.S. Groundsman II. Driver
Nekhavhambe, S.P. Groundsman I. Garden
Nenungwi, M.S. Groundsman I. Nursery
Ngwenya, H.T. Groundsman I. Garden
Rammela, N.N. Groundsman I. Machine operator
Randima, M. Groundsman I. Garden
Raphalalani, V.S. Groundsman I. Nursery
Steel. Miss B.S. N.D. (Nature Conservation). N.D. (Parks
& Recreation Admin.), Dip. (Journalism). Senior
Research Technician. Nursery, succulent and herb
gardens, plant records
Tebeile, Ms Z.M. Groundswoman II. Clerical Assistant
Tshisikule, G.M. Groundsman I. Garden
Turner, Ms S.L. B.Sc(Hons) Horticulturist
Van der Westhuizen, Mrs S. M.Sc. Environmental Educa-
tionalist
RESEARCH DIRECTORATE
PRETORIA
Director: Research — Vacant
Personal Secretary — Vacant
Liebenberg, Mrs E.J.L. M.Sc. Scientific Liaison Officer. Cytotaxonomy
PLANT SYSTEMATICS SUBDIRECTORATE
PRETORIA
Smith, G.F. Ph.D., F.L.S. Deputy Director. Systematics of succulents and rosulate, petaloid monocots
Mossmer, Ms M. B. Sc. (Hons). Scientific Officer. Research Assistant
Arnold, T.H. Head: Data Management (Pretoria)
Du Plessis, Mrs H. Head: Research Support Services (Pretoria)
Koekemoer. Miss M. Curator: National Herbarium (Pretoria)
Oliver, E.G.H. Curator: Stellenbosch Herbarium
Potgieter, Mrs E. B.Bibl. Senior Librarian
Rourke, Dr J.P. Curator: Compton Herbarium (Cape Town)
Williams, Ms R. Curator: Natal Herbarium (Durban)
DATA MANAGEMENT— PRETORIA
Arnold, T.H. M.Sc. Assistant Director. Computer application especially in taxonomy
De Wet, Mrs B.C. B. Sc. (Computer Science), B.A., Joubert, Mrs M.A. E. Senior Data Typist
H.D.L.S. Datametrician Van Staden, Ms M. N.D. (Computer Data Processing. As-
Evenwel, Mrs E. Quality control sistant Datametrician
Harris, Mrs B.J. Encoding, quality control
MARY GUNN LIBRARY— PRETORIA
Potgieter, Mrs E. B.Bibl. Senior Librarian
Coetzer, Mrs H.J. B.A. Library Assistant
Van der Walt, Ms A. M.E. Cataloguer
272
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
COMPTON HERBARIUM— CAPE TOWN
Rourke, J.P. Ph.D., F.L.S. Specialist Scientist. Systematics of southern African Proteaceae, Stilbaceae
Cupido, Mrs C. Administration Aid
Foster, Mrs S.E. Principal Typist
Holm, Mrs K. Scientific Assistant
Kurzweil, H. Ph.D. Scientist. Systematics of southern
African terrestrial orchids
Manning, J.C. Ph.D. Specialist Scientist. Systematics of Irida-
ceae and Orchidaceae; anatomy
Paterson-Jones, Mrs D.A. (nee Snijman). Ph.D. Principal
Scientist. Systematics of Amaryllidaceae; cladistics
Roux, J.P. N.T.C.(Hort.), F.L.S. , M.Sc. Principal Scien-
tist. Systematics of Pteridophyta
Steiner, K.E. Ph.D. Specialist Scientist. Systematics of
Scrophulariaceae and evolutionary interactions be-
tween oil-secreting flowers and oil-collecting bees
NATAL HERBARIUM— DURBAN
Williams, Ms R. B. Sc. (Hons.), H.D.E. Curator. Scientific Officer
Crouch, N.R. Ph.D. Ethnobotanist
Mbonambi, M.B. Groundsman I. Gardener
Ngwenya, M.A. Herbarium Assistant. Plant identification,
plant information
Noble, Mrs H-E. Administration Clerk
Nzimande, S.B. Groundsman I
Sikhakhane, T.B. Herbarium Assistant. Plant identifica-
tions, herbarium services
Singh, Ms Y. B.Sc.(Hons), H.E.D. Senior Scientific Officer.
Taxonomy of Zantedeschia, plant identifications
NATIONAL HERBARIUM— PRETORIA
Koekemoer, Miss M. M.Sc. Curator. Assistant Director. Taxonomy of Poaceae, Asteraceae;
Disparago and related genera
Germishuizen, G. M.Sc. Principal Scientist. Assistant Curator: Finances, Plant identifications,
taxonomy of Polygonaceae, Fabaceae, Loranthaceae, Viscaceae
Herman, P.P.J. M.Sc. Principal Scientist. Assistant Curator: Personnel. Taxonomy of Asteraceae,
Flora of Transvaal
Heymann, Mrs M.Z. T.E.Dip., B. A. (Education & History). Principal Specialized Auxiliary
Services Officer. Assistant Curator: Services
Meyer, Mrs N.L. B. Sc. (Hons). Senior Scientific
Taxonomy of Liliaceae
Anderson, H.M. Ph.D. Principal Scientist. Palaeobotany,
palaeogeography
Anderson, J.M. Ph.D. Specialist Scientist. Palaeobotany,
palaeogeography
Archer, R.H. M.Sc. Senior Scientific Officer. Taxonomy
of mainly Celastraceae, Euphorbiaceae
Archer (nee Reid) Mrs C. M.Sc. Senior Scientist. Taxon-
omy of Cyperaceae, Restionaceae, Orchidaceae
Bredenkamp, Mrs C.L. M.Sc. Chief Scientific Officer.
Taxonomy of Vitex, Rhamnaceae, Sterculiaceae and
other related families
Burgoyne, Ms P.M. B. Sc. (Hons). Senior Specialized Aux-
iliary Services Officer
Cloete, Mrs M. Dip. (Typing). Senior Provisioning Clerk
Dreyer, Miss L.L. M.Sc. Senior Scientific Officer. Taxon-
omy of Geraniaceae, Crassulaceae, Oxalidaceae
Fish, Mrs L. B.Sc. Chief Scientific Officer. Taxonomy of
Poaceae; plant collecting programme
Glen, H.F. Ph.D. Senior Scientist. Taxonomy of trees and
succulents, especially Aloe, also cultivated plants
Glen, Mrs R.P. M.Sc. Senior Scientific Officer. Taxon-
omy of ferns, water plants
Hartzer, Mrs P.C.M.H. M.Sc. Principal Scientific Officer.
Taxonomy of Mesembryanthemaceae
Jordaan, Mrs M. M.Sc. Chief Scientific Officer. Taxon-
omy of Casuarinaceae-Connaraceae
Kgaditsi, W.T. Specialized Auxiliary Serices Officer
Officer. Assistant Curator: Public relations
Lephaka, M.G.Specialized Auxiliary Services Officer. Par-
celling and pressing
Makgakga, M.C. Specialized Auxiliary Services Officer
Makgakga, S.K. Specialized Auxiliary Services Officer.
Mounting, herbarium specimens, spirit collection
Meyer, J.J. N.D. (Teaching). Specialized Auxiliary Serv-
ices Officer
Perold, Mrs S.M. Ph.D. Taxonomy of Ricciaceae, Hepa-
tic ae
Phahla, T.J. Specialized Auxiliary Services Officer.
Mounting herbarium specimens
Ready (nee Taussig), Mrs J.A. N.D.(Hort.). Senior Special-
ized Auxiliary Serices Officer. Taxonomy of Striga
Retief, Miss E. M.Sc. Senior Scientist. Pollen studies of
Boraginaceae. Taxonomy of Boraginaceae, Ver-
benaceae, Lamiaceae, Asteraceae, Rubiaceae
Smithies, Mrs S.J. M.Sc. Senior Scientific Officer. Taxon-
omy of mainly Scrophulariaceae, Selaginaceae, Lo-
be li ace ae
Van Rooy, J. M.Sc. Senior Scientist. Taxonomy and
biogeography of mosses
Veldman, Mrs J.M. Senior Provisioning Clerk
Victor, Ms J.E. B.Sc. (Hons.), H.Dip.Journ. Scientific Of-
ficer. Taxonomy of Proteaceae, Bruniaceae, Rosa-
ceae, Rutaceae
Welman, Miss W.G. M.Sc. Senior Scientist. Taxonomy of
Convolvulaceae, Solanaceae, Cucurbitaceae, Cam-
panulaceae, Asteraceae, Acanthaceae
Bothalia 25,2(1995)
273
STELLENBOSCH HERBARIUM
Oliver, E.G.H. M.Sc. Curator. Scientist. Taxonomy of the Ericoideae (Ericaceae)
Beyers, Mrs J.B.P. M.Sc. Scientist. Taxonomy of the Fellingham, Mrs A. C. B. Sc. Scientific Officer. Taxonomy
Gnidieae (Thymelaeaceae) of Clijfortia (Rosaceae)
Davidse, Mrs E. Scientific Assistant Leith, Mrs J. Administration Clerk
RESEARCH SUPPORT SERVICES— PRETORIA
Du Plessis, Mrs H. M.Sc. Head of Cost Centre. Scientist. Cytogenetics
Botha, Mrs A.G. Scientific Assistant. Anatomy, embryology Steyn, Miss C.C. Scientific Assistant. Anatomy, palynol-
Condy, Ms G.S. M.A. Botanical artist ogy
Romanowski, Mrs A.J. Dip. (Photography). Industrial Steyn, Mrs E. M.A. Ph.D. Senior Scientist. Embryology
Technician (Photography). Scientific photographer Thiart, Mrs S.M. Dip. (Typing). Principal Typist
ECOLOGY SUBDIRECTORATE
CAPE TOWN
Rutherford, M.C. Ph.D., Dip.(Datamet.). Deputy Director
Davis, G.W. Ph.D. Programme Leader Stress Ecology
Donaldson, J.S. M.Sc. (Entomology), Ph.D. (Zoology). Programme Leader. Conservation Biology
Fritz, M.F. Scientific Assistant
Hunter, Ms D.A. Administrative Secretary
Hurford, Ms J.L. M.Sc. Scientific Officer. Geographical information systems
O’Callaghan, M.G. Ph.D. Scientist. Plant climate interactions
Powrie, L.W. M.Sc. Scientific Officer. Ecological databases: computer co-ordination
Reynolds, Ms P.Y. B.A., H.D.L.S., B.Proc. Senior Librarian, Harry Molteno Library
STRESS ECOLOGY— CAPE TOWN
Davis, W.W. Ph.D. Programme Leader. Stress and disturbance ecology
De Witt, D.M. Scientific Assistant
Hoffman, M.T. Ph.D. Scientist. Disturbance and historical
ecology
Jagger, B.W. Scientific Assistant
Midgley, G.F. M.Sc. Scientist. Plant stress physiology/ ecology
Musil, C.F. Ph.D. Scientist. Plant stress physiology/ecol-
ogy
Snyders, S.G. Scientific Assistant
Wand, S.J.E. M.Sc.(Agric.). Scientist. Plant stress physiology/
ecology
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY— CAPE TOWN
Donaldson, J.S. M.Sc. (Entomology), Ph.D. (Zoology). Assistant Director. Programme Leader,
Cycad biology, plant/insect interactions, conservation biology
Bosenberg, J. de W. B. Sc. (Hons). Scientific Officer
Botha, P.A. N.H.D.(HorL). Scientific Officer. Tissue cul-
ture research, seed biology
Bowler, Mrs M. Laboratory & Office Aid
Brown, N.A.C. Ph.D. Specialist Scientist. Seed biology
research, plant growth regulators
De Lange, J.H. B.Sc.(Hort.), M.Sc. (Plant Physiology),
D.Sc.(Agric.), Ph.D.(Bot.). Specialist Scientist.
Ecology, tissue culture, horticulture
Hilton-Taylor, C. B.Sc.(Hons)(Biological Sci.). Assistant
Scientist. Threatened plants, biodiversity of arid
regions
McDonald, D.J. M.Sc. Senior Scientist. Mountain vegeta-
tion, biogeography, conservation
Nanni, Ms I. B.Sc., H.E.D. Scientific Officer. Ecology,
conservation biology
Parenzee, Ms H.A. Administrative Assistant
Rebelo, A.G. Ph.D. (Zoology). Scientist. Conservation bi-
ology, biogeography
Scott, Mrs G. B.Sc. (Pharmacy), M.Sc. Scientific Offi-
cer. Plant secondary compounds, medicinal plants
HARRY MOLTENO LIBRARY— CAPE TOWN
Reynolds, Ms P.Y. B.A., H.D.L.S., B.Proc. Senior Librarian
274
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
PUBLICATIONS BY THE STAFF
(1st April 1994— 3 1st March 1995)
ARCHER, R.H. & VAN WYK, A.E. 1994. Bark structure of Cassine s.l.
(Celastraceae) in southern Africa. In J.H. Seyani & A.C. Chikuni,
Proceedings of the Xlllth Plenary Meeting of AETFAT, Zornba,
Malawi, 2-11 April 1991 : 1269-1278.
ASHWELL, A.N. 1994a. National Botanical Institute grows education
programmes for schools. Bion Newsletter 30: 14-16.
ASHWELL, A.N. 1994b. Review: The global scout: scouting for nature
and environment, by Frank Opie, 1993. Veld & Flora 80: 62.
ASHWELL, A.N. 1994c. Review: The greater St Lucia Wetland Park,
by R. Taylor, 1991. Veld & Flora 80: 62.
BAXTER, B.J.M., VAN STADEN, J„ GRANGER, J.E. & BROWN.
N. A.C. 1 994. Plant-derived smoke extracts stimulate seed germi-
nation of the fire-climax grass Themeda triandra. Environmental
and Experimental Botany 34: 217-223.
BEYERS, J.B.P. & VAN DER WALT, J.A.A. 1994. Inflorescence
morphology of Lachnaea and Cryptadenia (Thymelaeaceae).
Bothalia 24: 195-202.
BOND, W.J.. STOCK. W. & HOFFMAN, M.T. 1994. Has the Karoo
spread? A test for desertification using stable carbon isotopes
from soils. South African Journal of Science 90: 391-397.
BROWN, N.A.C. 1994a. First the gas, now instant dehydrated smoke.
Kirstenbosch Instant Smoke Plus Seed Primer now available for
easier germination of indigenous plant seeds. Veld & Flora 80:
72, 73.
BROWN, N.A.C. 1994b. Kirstenbosch instant smoke-plus seed primer.
Forum Botanicum 31,4: 8.
BROWN. N.A.C. 1994c. Instant smoke for fynbos. South African Gar-
den Guide. October 1994: 6.
BROWN, N.A.C. 1994d. Smoke in a packet. Australian Horticulture,
November 1994: 84.
BROWN, N.A.C. 1995a. Instant smoke-plus seed primer. Sappex News,
January 1995.
BROWN, N.A.C. 1995b. Smoking out seedlings. Pacific Horticulture
56: 45-47.
BROWN, N.A.C.. DE LANGE, J.H.. VAN STADEN, J. & BAXTER.
B.J.M. 1994. Plant-derived smoke: an important, newly-discov-
ered natural cue for seed germination. Current research and its
application to Australian plant species. In K. A. O'Connell & D.R.
Barrett, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on
Environmental Issues and Waste Management in Energy and
Mineral Production. Perth, W. Australia, 29 Aug.-l Sept., 1994.
BROWN, N.A.C.. JAMIESON, H. & BOTHA, P.A. 1994. Stimulation
of seed germination in South African species of Restionaceae by
plant-derived smoke. Plant Growth Regulation 15: 93-100.
BROWN, N.A.C. & SPENCER-JONES, H. 1994. Besser Keimen im
Rauch. GEO 2:156, 157.
COWAN, A.K.. TURNER. S.L. & BOTHA. C.E.J. 1995. Effect of water
stress and diclofop-methyl on photosynthesis, carotenoid and
abscisic acid content of leaves of Arena byzantina and Arena
fatua. South African Journal of Botany 61: 29-34.
COWLING, R.M., ESLER, K.J., MIDGLEY, G.F. & HONIG. M. 1994.
Plant functional diversity, species diversity and climate in arid
and semi-arid southern Africa. Journal of Arid Environments 27:
141-158.
COWLING. R.M. & HILTON-TAYLOR, C. 1994. Patterns of plant
diversity and endemism in southern Africa: an overview. In B.J.
Huntley, Botanical diversity in southern Africa, Parts 1 & 2.
Strelitzia 1: 31-51.
CRIBB. P.J. & KURZWEIL, H. 1994. The genus Corycium (Orchi-
daceae) newly reported for Tanzania. Kew Bulletin 49: 555-557.
CROUCH, N.R. 1994a. The weedy ferns of Fcrncliffe. Unusual invaders
threaten Natal’s flora. Veld & Flora 80: 88-90.
CROUCH, N.R. 1994b. Turning the screws on bog bugs. Genlisea, a
carnivorous genus. Veld & Flora 80: 56, 57.
CROUCH, N.R. 1994c. Oxytenanthera abyssinica, a second bamboo
species for South Africa. PlantLife 1 1 : 23, 24.
CROUCH, N.R. 1994d. Fcrncliffe, a must for passing Vaalies. Pterido-
forum 34: 3-6.
CROUCH. N.R. 1994e. The ferns of Feme l iff e. A rambler’s guide.
Shore-Net Publications, Howick.
CROUCH, N.R., MCDONALD, G„ NGWENYA, A., NICHOLS, G„
SIKHAKANE, B. & SINGH, Y. 1994. Zeuxine africana: Dur-
ban’s odd-ball orchid. South African Orchid Journal 25:
127-129.
DAVIS, G.W. 1994a. Review: Modelling biological populations in space
and time, by E. Renshaw, 1991. Bothalia 24: 1 19.
DAVIS, G.W. 1994b. Botany without plants. Playing games that tell us
more about nature. Veld & Flora 80: 49-51.
DAVIS, G.W. 1994c. Contemporary land use conflicts: adjusting to
reconstructive policy options for a democratic South Africa
(Summary of conference paper). Noticiero de Biologia 2: 20.
DAVIS, G.W. 1994d. Meeting report: International concern with func-
tional aspects of biodiversity. South African Journal of Science
91:61,62.
DAVIS. G.W. 1994e. Editorial: Viva the scientific revolution. Bulletin
of the Southern African Institute of Ecologists & Environmental
Scientists 13,3: 1, 2.
DAVIS, G.W. 1994f. Editorial: A shallow gradient of political transition:
time left to act. Bulletin of the Southern African Institute of
Ecologists & Environmental Scientists 13,2: 1.
DAVIS, G.W. 1994g. Kickstarting global change research in southern
Africa: a report of the first Southern, Central and Eastern African
(SAF) regional workshop of the Global Change SysTem for
Analysis Research and Training (START), Gaborone, Botswana,
July 4-7, 1994. Bulletin of the Southern African Institute of
Ecologists & Environmental Scientists 13,2: 17-20.
DAVIS, G.W., MIDGLEY, G.F. & HOFFMAN, M.T. 1994. Linking
biodiversity to ecosystem function: a challenge to fynbos ecolo-
gists. South African Journal of Science 90: 319-321.
DAVIS, G.W. & RICHARDSON, D.M. 1995. Mediterranean-type ecosys-
tems: the function of biodiversity. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
DAVIS, G.W. & RUTHERFORD, M.C. 1995. Ecosystem function of
biodiversity: can we learn from the collective experience of MTE
Research? In G.W. Davis & D.M. Richardson, Mediterranean-
type ecosystems: the function of biodiversity. Springer-Verlag,
Heidelberg.
DONALDSON, J.S. & SCOTT, G. 1994. Aspects of human dependence
on plant diversity in the Cape mediterranean-type ecosystem.
South African Journal of Science 90: 338-342.
DRY, D.H. 1994a. Preliminary report on the growth rate of indigenous
tree species at the Pretoria National Botanical Garden. Parks and
Grounds 80: 53, 54.
DRY. D.H. 1994b. Jams. ..and jellies. South African Garden Guide: 4:
24, 25.
DRY, D.H. 1994c. The myrrh of the Bible. The South African nursery-
man 13,2: 15. 16.
DUNCAN, G.D. 1994. The genus Laclienalia, and the discovery of a
beautiful new species from the Western Cape Province of South
Africa. Shin-Kaki 163: 32-35.
FELLINGHAM, A.C. 1994. Cliffortia longifolia, a ‘good’ species or
should it be a variety under C. strobiliferal (Rosaceae). Bothalia
24: 31-34.
GERMISHUIZEN, G. & CONDY, G. 1994. Rhynchosia villosa
(Fabaceae). Flowering Plants of Africa 53: 32-35, t. 2087.
GERMISHUIZEN, G„ LEISTNER, O.A., MARCH, H. & SCOTT, M„
1994. Erianthemum dregei (Loranthaceae). Flowering Plants of
Africa 53: 16-19, t. 2084.
GERMISHUIZEN. G„ LEISTNER, O.A. & SCOTT, M. 1994a.
Vanwykia remota ( Loranthaceae). Flowering Plants of Africa 53:
2-5, t. 2081.
GERMISHUIZEN, G.. LEISTNER, O.A. & SCOTT, M. 1994b.
Pedistylis galpinii (Loranthaceae). Flowering Plants of Africa
53: 6-9, t. 2082.
GERMISHUIZEN, G„ LEISTNER, O.A. & SCOTT, M. 1994c. Tapi-
nanthus terminaliae (Loranthaceae). Flowering Plants of Africa
53: 20-24, t. 2085.
GERMISHUIZEN, G. & SCOTT. M. 1994. Moquiniella rubra (Loran-
thaceae). Flowering Plants of Africa 53: 10-14, t. 2083.
GLEN, H.F., LAVRANOS, J.J. & CONDY. G. 1994. Crinum balfourii
(Amaryllidaceae). Flowering Plants of Africa 53: 64-68, t. 2093.
GLEN, H.F. & SMITH, S. 1994. A larin in the First National Bank
Museum. Journal of the Association of Numismatic Societies of
South Africa 4: 6, 7.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 1994. New taxa and revisions to
the taxonomy of southern African Lapeirousia subgenus Lapei-
rousia (Iridaceae: Ixioideae). Novon 4: 339-346.
HILTON-TAYLOR, C. 1994a. Karoo-Namib Regional Centre of Ende-
mism: CPD site AF50. The Kaokoveld, Namibia and Angola. In
S.D. Davis, V.H. Heywood & A.C. Hamilton, Centres of plant
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
275
diversity. A guide and strategy for their conservation. Vol. 1.
Europe, Africa, South West Asia and the Middle East: 201-203.
WWF & IUCN, Cambridge.
HILTON-TAYLOR, C. 1994b. Karoo-Namib Regional Centre of Ende-
mism: CPD Site AF51. Western Cape Domain (Succulent
Karoo), Republic of South Africa and Namibia. In S.D. Davis,
V.H. Heywood & A.C. Hamilton, Centres of plant diversity. A
guide and strategy for their conservation. Vol. 1 . Europe, Africa,
South West Asia and the Middle East: 204-217. WWF & IUCN,
Cambridge.
HILTON-TAYLOR, C. 1994c. Convenor, working group 6: Species-
level issues and actions. In B.J. Huntley, Botanical diversity in
southern Africa, Part 2: workshop reports. Strelitzia 1: 372-380.
HILTON-TAYLOR, C. & SMITH, G.F. 1994. The conservation status
of Aloaceae in southern Africa. In B.J. Huntley, Botanical diver-
sity in southern Africa, Parts 1 & 2. Strelitzia 1 : 287-303.
HOBBS, R.J., RICHARDSON, D.M. & DAVIS, G.W. 1995. Opportu-
nities and constraints for studying the function of biodiversity. In
G.W. Davis & D.M. Richardson, Mediterranean-type ecosys-
tems: the function of biodiversity. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
HOFFMAN, M.T. 1994a. Bibliography of southern African arid zone
literature up to 1993. Unpublished data base of over 6000 refer-
ences made available to research community on diskette. 2nd edn,
July 1994. National Botanical Institute.
HOFFMAN, M.T. 1994b. Desertification in Namibia: a conference on
prevention. Bulletin of the Southern African Institute of Ecolo-
gists & Environmental Scientists 13,2: 14—17.
HOFFMAN, M.T., KERLEY, G.I.H., MILTON, S.J. & DEAN, W.R.J.
1994. Desertification in developed countries. Bulletin of the
Southern A frican Institute of Ecologists & Environmental Scien-
tists 13,3: 15, 16.
HOFFMAN, M.T., MIDGLEY, G.F. & COWLING, R.M. 1994. Plant
richness is negatively related to energy availability in semi-arid
southern Africa. Biodiversity Letters 2: 35-38.
HUNTLEY, B.J. (ed.) 1994a. Botanical diversity in southern Africa,
Parts 1 & 2. Strelitzia 1. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria.
HUNTLEY, B.J. 1994b. Introduction: new challenges and partnerships
for botany in southern Africa. In B.J. Huntley, Botanical diversity
in southern Africa, Part 1. Strelitzia 1: 1-8.
HUNTLEY, B.J. 1994c. Introduction: The workshop: botanical diversity
network for southern Africa. In B.J. Huntley, Botanical diversity
in southern Africa, Part 2. Strelitzia 1 : 343-345.
JAMES, C.D., HOFFMAN, M.T., LIGHTFOOT, D.C., FORBES, G.S.
& WHITFORD, W.G. 1994. Phenology and fruit production in
Yucca elata (Liliaceae), and the relationship with yucca moth
(Tegeticula yuccasella) abundance. Oikos 69: 207-216.
JAMIESON, H. & BROWN. N.A.C. 1994. The restio garden at Kirsten-
bosch. Veld & Flora 80: 124, 125.
JOHNSON, S.D. & STEINER, K.E. 1994. Pollination by megachilid
bees and determinants of fruit-set in the Cape orchid, Disa tenui-
folia. Nordic Journal of Botany 14: 48 1 — 485.
KILLICK, D.J.B. & CONDY, g’ 1994. Ammocharis nerinoides
(Amaryllidaceae). Flowering Plants of Africa 53: 60-63, t. 2092.
KURZWEIL, H. 1994a. The anatomy of the Diseae. Proceedings of the
14th World Orchid Conference, Glasgow, 1993 : 394—396.
KURZWEIL, H. 1994b. The unusual seeds of the Disa uniflora group,
with notes on their dispersal. Proceedings of the 14th World
Orchid Conference, Glasgow, 1993: 397-399.
LE ROUX, P.M., KOTZE, C.D., NEL, G.P. & GLEN, H.F. 1994.
Bossieveld: weiplante van die Karoo en karooagtige ge-
biede/grazing plants of the Karoo and karroid areas. Department
of Agricultural Information, Pretoria.
LEISTNER, O.A. 1994. Annuals of the arid transition zone between
winter and summer rainfall regions in southern Africa. In J.H.
Seyani & A.C. Chikuni, Proceedings of the Xlllth Plenary Meet-
ing ofAETFAT, Zomba, Malawi, 2-11 April 1991: 1 181-1 193.
LINDER. H.P. & KURZWEIL, H. 1994. The phytogeny and classifica-
tion of the Diseae (Orchidoideae: Orchidaceae). Annals of the
Missouri Botanical Garden 81: 687-713.
MANNING, J.C. 1994. What’s in a name? Indigenous Bulb Growers’
Association of South Africa Bulletin 42: 15-18.
MANNING, J.C. & GOLDBLATT, P. 1995. What is Gladiolus cruen-
tusl Veld & Flora 8 1 : 4—7.
MANNING, J.C. & STIRTON, C. 1994. Endothecial thickenings and
phytogeny of the Leguminosae. In I.K. Ferguson & S.C. Tucker,
Advances in legume systematics, Part 6, Structural botany:
141-164. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
MCDONALD, D.J. 1994a. Smoke treatment of seed enhances germina-
tion. Hortagro 1: 12, 13.
MCDONALD, D.J. 1994b. The swamp daisy and friends. Osmitopsis
asteriscoides shines in the fynbos. Veld & Flora 80: 78-80.
McDONALD, D.J. 1994c. Notes on Aloe gracilis var. decumbens. Aloe
31: 46, 47.
McDONALD, D.J. & DONALDSON, J.S. 1 994. Mountain strawberries.
Is Syncarpha eximia being over-exploited by wildflower pickers?
Veld c£ Flora 80: 53-55.
MIDGLEY, G.F., MIDGLEY, J.J., BOND, W.J. & LINDER, H.P. 1994.
C3 mistletoes on CAM hosts: an ecophysiological perspective on
an unusual combination. South African Journal of Science 90:
482^185.
NGWENYA, M.A. 1994. Tribute to an amateur: Jobe Mafuleka, Part 1 .
Plantlife 11: 13, 14.
O’CALLAGHAN, M. & HURFORD, J.L. 1994a. National Botanical
Institute uses Arc/Info. Computing, 12 September 1994: 25.
O’CALLAGHAN, M. & HURFORD, J.L. 1994b. Studying the effects
of climate change on plants. Computer Graphics 5,6: 8-10.
O’DONOGHUE, R. & ASHWELL, A.N. 1994. Trends and patterns in
environmental education, and their links to approaches to learn-
ing, teaching and evaluation. Environmental Education Bulletin
9: 14-16.
OLIVER, E.G.H. 1994a. Studies in the Ericoideae. XV. The generic
relationship between Erica and Ericinella. Bothalia 24: 121-126.
OLIVER, E.G.H. 1994b. Phytogeography and endemism in the Eri-
coideae (Ericaceae). In J.H. Seyani & A.C. Chikuni, Proceedings
of the Xlllth Plenary Meeting of AETFAT, Zomba, Malawi, 2-11
April 1991: 941-951.
OLIVER, E.G.H. 1995. Erica — update on species numbers. Yearbook of
the Heather Society 1995: 11, 12.
OLIVER, E.G.H. & FELLINGHAM, A.C. 1994. A new serotinous
species of Cliffortia (Rosaceae) from the southwestern Cape, with
notes on Cliffortia arborea. Bothalia 24: 153-162.
OLIVER, E.G.H. & OLIVER, I.M. 1994. Studies in the Ericoideae. XIV.
Notes on the genus Erica. Bothalia 24: 25-30.
OLIVER, I.B. 1994a. Growing South African succulents. National Bo-
tanical Institute, Cape Town.
OLIVER, I.B. 1994b. The OFS National Botanical Garden. Veld & Flora
80: 121-123.
PEROLD, S.M. 1994a. Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from
southern Africa. 4. Mannia capensis, section and subgenus Xero-
mannia (Aytoniaceae). Bothalia 24: 9-14.
PEROLD, S.M. 1994b. Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from
southern Africa. 5. The genus Exorrnotheca, E. pustulosa and E.
holstii. Bothalia 24: 15-23.
PEROLD, S.M. 1994c. Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from
southern Africa. 6. The genus Asterella (Aytoniaceae: Re-
boulioideae) and its four local species. Bothalia 24: 133-147.
PEROLD, S.M. 1994d. Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from
southern Africa. 7. The genus Cryptornitrium (Aytoniaceae) and
C. oreades sp. nov. Bothalia 24: 149-152.
PHILLIPSON, P.B. & CONDY, G. 1994. Decarya madagascariensis
(Didiereaceae). Flowering Plants of Africa 53: 26-30, t. 2086.
REBELO, A.G. 1994a. Using the Proteaceae to design a nature reserve
network and determine conservation priorities for the Cape Flor-
istic Region. In P.L. Forey, C.J. Humphries & R. Vane-Wright,
Systematics and conservation evaluation: 375-396. Clarendon
Press, Oxford.
REBELO, A.G. 1994b. Cape Regional Centre for Endemism: CPD Site
AF 53. Cape Floristic Region. Republic of South Africa. In S.D.
Davis, V.H. Heywood & A.C. Hamilton, Centres of plant diver-
sity. A guide and strategy for their conservation. Vol. 1 . Europe,
Africa, South West Asia and the Middle East: 218-224. WWF &
IUCN, Cambridge.
REBELO, A.G. 1994c. Iterative selection procedures: centres of ende-
mism and optimal placement of reserves. In B.J. Huntley, Botani-
cal diversity in southern Africa. Strelitzia 1: 231-257.
REBELO, A.G. 1994d. Convenor, working group 7: Ecosystem-level
issues and actions. Designing a conservation network for preserv-
ing ecosystem and plant diversity in southern Africa. In B.J.
Huntley, Botanical diversity in southern Africa, Part 2: workshop
reports. Strelitzia 1: 381-386.
RICHARDSON, D.M., COWLING, R.M., BOND, W.J., STOCK, W.D.
& DAVIS, G.W. 1995. Links between biodiversity and ecosys-
tem function in the Cape Floristic Region. In G.W. Davis, & D.M.
Richardson, Mediterranean-type ecosystems: the function of bio-
diversity. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
ROURKE, J.P. 1994a. A new species of Leucospermum from the south-
western Cape. Bothalia 24: 167-170.
ROURKE, J.P. 1994b. Camellias at the Cape — the first century,
1790-1900. International Camellia Journal 26: 61-64.
276
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
ROURKE, J.P. 1994c. Helen Vanderplank’s Wild Flowers of the Port
Elizabeth Area. Brenthurst Archives 1: 19—29.
ROURKE, J.P. 1994d. In memoriam. Ellaphie Ward-Hilhorst, 10-7-1920
to 30-6-1994. Veld & Flora 80: 67.
ROURKE, J.P. 1994e. Mimetes chrysanthus. Kew Magazine 11:
178-183.
ROURKE, J.P. 1994f. The conservation of genetic resources in the
southern African Proteaceae. Journal of the International Protea
Association 27: 2-7.
ROURKE, J.P. 1994g. Three new species of Serruria (Proteaceae).
Bothalia 24: 1-7.
ROURKE, J.P. 1994h. John Herschel and the Cape Flora. Transactions
of the Royal Society of South Africa 49: 71-86.
ROURKE, J.P. 1994i. Thunberg’s contribution to plant systematics in
South Africa. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa
49: 155-160.
ROURKE, J.P. 1995. A new species of Brachysiphon from the south-
western Cape. Nordic Journal of Botany 15: 1-4.
ROUX, J.P. 1994a. Systematic studies in the genus Mohria (Pterido-
phyta: Anemiaceae). V. Karyology. Bothalia 24: 97-99.
ROUX, J.P. 1994b. Lectotypification of Asplenium lucidum Burnt. f.
(Aspleniaceae). Taxon 43: 641, 642.
RUNDEL, P.W., COWLING, R.. ESLER. K. MUSTART, P„ VAN
JAARSVELD, E. & BEZUIDENHOUT, H. 1994. Why the half-
mens, Pachypodium namaquanum , faces north. Veld & Flora 80:
106. 107.
SINGH, Y. & NGWENYA, A.M. 1995. Pressing iridaceous flowers.
PlantLife 12: 14—16.
SLATTERY, C.M. 1994. Some thoughts on worksheets and their devel-
opment. Environmental Education Bulletin 9: 6.
SMITH, G.F. 1994a. A note on Brachystelma luteuni R.G. Peckover
( Asclepiadaceae). Aloe 31: 16.
SMITH, G.F. 1994b. Conservation — is there a solution? Aloe 31: 17-20.
SMITH, G.F. 1994c. Taxonomic history of Poellnitzia Uitewaal, a
unispecific genus of Alooideae (Asphodelaceae). Haseltonia 2:
74-78.
SMITH, G.F. 1994d. The ecology and conservation of Chortolirion and
Poellnitzia (Aloaceae) in southern Africa. Excelsa : 143-152.
SMITH, G.F., GLEN, H.F., VAN WYK. A.E. & CONDY. G. 1994. Aloe
bowiea (Asphodelaceae). Flowering Plants of Africa 53: 80-84,
t. 2096.
SMITH, G.F. & LEISTNER, O.A. 1994. Flora of southern Africa to
continue. South African Journal of Science 90: 256.
SMITH, G.F., MEYER. N.L. & GLEN, H.F. 1994. Little-known generic
names in the family Aloaceae. South African Journal of Science
90: 489, 490.
SMITH, G.F., VAN WYK, B-E. & GLEN, H.F. 1994. Aloe barberae to
replace A. bainesii. Bothalia 24: 34, 35.
SMITH, G.F., VAN WYK, B-E. & VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. 1 994. Was
Gasteria nitida var. annstrongii validly published? (Asphode-
laceae/Aloaceae). Bothalia 24: 34.
SMITHIES, S.J. 1994. A world in one street — the natural aspects of
Church Street. In F. Krige & G. van der Waal, Pretoria, Church
Street. Pretoria City Council.
SNIJMAN, D.A. 1994a. Systematics of Hessea, Strumaria and Car-
polyza (Amaryllideae: Amaryllidaceae). Contributions from the
Bolus Herbarium 165: 1-162.
SNIJMAN, D.A. 1994b. What makes southern Africa’s Amaryllidaceae
special? The Indigenous Bulb Growers Association of South
Africa Bulletin 42: 36-38.
SNIJMAN, D.A. 1994c. Two rare Cape Amaryllidaceae species. Veld &
Flora 80: 1 17.
SNIJMAN, D.A. 1994d. Plant systematics reach for the summit. Eco-
focus 13: 14, 15.
SNIJMAN, D.A. 1995. A new Nerine species (Amaryllidaceae tribe
Amaryllideae) from the Koup Karoo, South Africa. Novon 5:
103-105.
SNIJMAN, D.A. & WEBER, R. 1994. Haemantluis barkerae (Amaryl-
lidaceae). Flowering Plants of Africa 53: 76-79, t. 2095.
SNIJMAN, D.A. & WILLIAMSON. G. 1994. A taxonomic reassessment
of Ammocharis herrei and Cybistetes longifolia (Amaryllideae:
Amaryllidaceae). Bothalia 24: 127-132.
SPIES, J.J., LINDER, H P., LABUSCHAGNE, I.F. & DU PLESSIS, H.
1994. Cytogenetic evidence for the species delimitation of Pen-
taschistis airoides and P. patula (Poaceae: Arundineae). In J.H.
Seyani & A.C. Chikuni. Proceedings of the Xlllth Plenary Meet-
ing of AETFAT, Zomba, Malawi, 2-11 April 1991: 373-383.
STEINER, K.E. 1994. A new Nemesia from the interior of the southern
Cape, South Africa. South African Journal of Botany 60:
211-213.
STEYN, E.M.A. 1994. Ovules of 'uerte’ flowers with reduced male
function. South African Avocado Growers ' Association Yearbook
17: 94-102.
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. 1994a. Review: The complete guide to trees of
Natal, Zululand and Transkei, by Elsa Pooley. African Wildlife
48,2: 47.
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. 1994b. Gasterias of South Africa. Fernwood
Press.
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. 1994c. The establishment of Gasteria bavlis-
siana in its habitat of the Zuurberg, E. Cape (South Africa).
British Cactus & Succulent Journal 12: 73, 74.
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. 1994d. Vygie colour. Garden & Home, Sep-
tember: 94-98.
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. 1994e. The Sansevieria species of South Africa
and Namibia. Aloe 31: 11-15.
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. 1994f. Saphesia flaccida and its conservation.
British Cactus & Succulent Journal 12: 98-103.
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. 1994g. Omithogalum sardienii , a new dwarf
succulent bulb from the Little Karoo. Bradleya 12: 32-35.
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. 1994h. The Namib caper, Capparis hereroen-
sis. Veld & Flora 80: 108, 109.
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. 1994i. A synopsis of the genus Stoeberia. Aloe
31:68-76.
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. 1994j. The distribution of Tylecodon and
Cotyledon (Crassulaceae) in South Africa and Namibia. In J.H.
Seyani & A.C. Chikuni, Proceedings of the Xlllth Plenary Meet-
ing of AETFAT, Zomba, Malawi, 2-11 April 1991: 1157-1163.
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. 1995a. Eastern Transvaal splendour. Caltex,
South Africa.
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. 1995b. The Hanson Namib Expedition. British
Cactus & Succulent Journal 13: 3-8.
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. & COWLING, S. 1994. The succulent flora of
the greater Cape Peninsula. Aloe 31 : 21-29.
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. & KOUTNIK, D. 1995. Tylecodon scandens,
(Crassulaceae), a new species from the Knersvlakte (northwest-
ern Cape Province). Cactus and Succulent Journal (US) 67:
40-43.
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J., SMITH, G.F. & VAN WYK, B-E. 1994. A
cladistic analysis of Gasteria (Aloaceae). South African Journal
of Science 90: 467^170.
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. & WEBER, R. 1994. Gasteria carinata var. retusa
(Asphodelaceae). Flowering Plants of Africa 53: 86-89, t. 2097.
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. & WILLIAMSON, G. 1994. Tylecodon
longipes (Crassulaceae), a new species from the south central
Richtersveld (northwestern Cape Province). Aloe 31: 56-59.
VAN WYK, A.E. & CONDY. G. 1994. Friesodielsia obovata (Annon-
aceae). Flowering Plants of Africa 53: 42^17, t. 2089.
WALTER, G.H. & DONALDSON, J.S. 1994. Heteronomous hyper-
parasitoids, sex ratios and adaptations. Ecological Entomology
19:89-92.
WAND, S.J.E. 1994. 45th Annual Meeting of the American Institute of
Biological Sciences (AIBS): Ecological Society of America.
Bulletin of the Southern African Institute of Ecologists and Envi-
ronmental Scientists 1 3,3: 22, 23.
WOOD, J„ LOW, A.B., DONALDSON, J.S. & REBELO, A.G. 1994.
Threats to plant diversity through urbanisation and habitat frag-
mentation in greater Cape Town. In B.J. Huntley, Botanical
diversity in southern Africa, Part 1. Strelitzia 1: 259-274.
Bothalia 25,2: 277-285 (1995)
Guide for authors to Bothalia
This guide is updated when necessary and includes an
index. Important points and latest additions appear in
bold type.
Bothalia is named in honour of General Louis Botha,
first Premier and Minister of Agriculture of the Union of
South Africa. This house journal of the National Botanical
Institute, Pretoria, is devoted to the furtherance of botani-
cal science. The main fields covered are taxonomy, ecol-
ogy, anatomy and cytology. Two parts of the journal and
an index to contents, authors and subjects are published
annually.
1 Editorial policy
1 . 1 Bothalia welcomes original papers dealing with Bora
and vegetation of southern Africa and related subjects.
Full-length papers and short notes, as well as book re-
views, are accepted. Manuscripts may be written in either
English or Afrikaans.
1.2 Page charges: As stated in our notification included
in volume 23,1 (May 1993), MSS submitted for publica-
tion in Bothalia after the 10th June 1993 are subject to
payment of page charges of R 1 25,00 per printed page,
VAT included. The following are exempt from these
charges: 1, NBI members; 2, persons/institutions who
have been granted exemption by the Executive Committee
of the NBI; 3, authors of contributions requested by the
Editor. The Editor’s decision on the number of pages is
final. An invoice will be sent to the author, who must
arrange for payment as soon as possible to NBI, publica-
tions section. Private Bag XI 01, Pretoria 0001.
1 .3 Articles are assessed by referees, both local and over-
seas. Authors are welcome to suggest possible referees to
judge their work. Authors are responsible for the factual
correctness of their contributions. Bothalia maintains an
editorial board (see title page) to ensure that international
standards are upheld.
Hard copy of articles should preferably be accom-
panied by PC diskettes or stiffies.
2 Requirements for diskettes/stiffies
2.1 data must be IBM compatible and written in ASCII,
or in Word for Windows from Windows 1; Word for
MS-DOS from MSWord 3; Word for Macintosh from
Macintosh 4; WordPerfect 5 onwards; Windows Write
3 onwards.
2.2 the original printout of the diskette should be supplied
in double line spacing.
2.3 tables need not be placed on the diskette — a clearly
laid out hard copy is adequate.
2.4 use a non-breaking space to keep two elements
together on the same line e.g. 3 500.
2.5 do not justify lines.
2.6 do not break words, except hyphenated words.
2.7 all lines, headings, keys, etc., should start flush at the
margin, therefore no indentations of any kind.
2.8 italics and bold should be used where necessary.
2.9 paragraphs and headings are delineated by a car-
riage return (ENTER) but no indentation.
2.10 a hyphen is designated as one dash, with no space
between the letter and the dash, e.g. ovate-lanceolate. See
also 17.6.
2.11 an N-dash is typed as three hyphens with no space
between the letter and the hyphen, e.g. 2 5 mm (type-
set, it looks like this, 2-5 mm).
2.12 an M-dash is typed as two hyphens with no space
between the letter and the hyphen, e.g. computers - - what
a blessing! (typeset, it looks like this, computers — what).
2.13 do not use a double space between words, after
commas, full stops, colons, semicolons or exclamation
marks.
2.14 use lower case x as times sign, with one space on
either side of the x, e.g. 2x3 mm.
2.15 use single (not double) opening and closing quotes,
e.g. the so-called ‘stiffy’ refers to a rigid diskette.
2.16 keys — put only three leader dots before number and
name of taxon (with one space before and one space after
the first and last dot), regardless of how far or near the
word is from the right margin, e.g. ... 1. R. ovata (see
13.18).
3 Requirements for a manuscript
3.1 The original manuscript should be typewritten on one
side of good quality A4-size paper, double-spaced
throughout (including abstract, tables, captions to figures,
literature references, etc.) and have a margin of at least 30
mm all round. Three photocopies (preferably photo-
copied on both sides of the paper to reduce weight for
postage) of all items, including text, illustrations, tables
and lists should be submitted, and the author should retain
a complete set of copies.
3.2 Papers should conform to the general style and layout
of recent issues of Bothalia (from volume 17 onwards).
3.3 Material should be presented in the following se-
quence: Title page with title, name(s) of author(s), key-
words, abstracts (in English and Afrikaans) and informa-
tion that should be placed in a footnote on the title page,
such as address(es) of author(s) and mention of granting
agencies.
3.4 The sequence continues with Introduction and aims.
Material and methods, Results, Interpretation (Discus-
sion), Specimens examined (in revisions and mono-
graphs), Acknowledgements, References, Index of names
(recommended for revisions dealing with more than about
1 5 species). Tables, Captions for figures and figures. In the
case of short notes and book reviews, keywords and ab-
stract are superfluous.
278
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
3.5 All pages must be numbered consecutively beginning
with the title page to those with references, tables and
captions to figures.
3.6 For notes on the use of hyphens and dashes see 2.10 to
2.12.
3.7 Special character: use your own word or code that
is unique and self-explanatory, enclosed between AN-
GLE BRACKETS, e.g. <mu>m for pm. Please supply
us with a list of the codes.
4 Author(s)
When there are several authors the covering letter
should indicate clearly which of them is responsible for
correspondence and, if possible, telephonically available
while the article is being processed. The contact address
and telephone number should be mentioned if they differ
from those given on the letterhead.
5 Title
The title should be as concise and as informative as
possible. In articles dealing with taxonomy or closely re-
lated subjects the family of the taxon under discussion
(see also 13.2) should be mentioned in brackets but author
citations should be omitted from plant names.
6 Keywords
Up to 10 keywords (or index terms) should be provided
in English in alphabetical sequence. The following points
should be borne in mind when selecting keywords:
6.1 keywords should be unambiguous, internationally ac-
ceptable words and not recently coined little-known
words.
6.2 they should be in a noun form and verbs should be
avoided.
6.3 they should not consist of an adjective alone; adjec-
tives should be combined with nouns.
6.4 they should not contain prepositions.
6.5 the singular form should be used for processes and
properties, e.g. evaporation.
6.6 the plural form should be used for physical objects, e.g.
augers.
6.7 location (province and/or country); taxa (species, ge-
nus, family) and vegetation type (community, veld type,
biome) should be used as keywords.
6.8 keywords should be selected hierarchically where
possible, e.g. both family and species should be included.
6.9 they should include terms used in the title.
6.10 they should answer the following questions:
6. 1 0. 1 what is the active concept in the document (activity,
operation or process).
6. 1 0.2, what is the passive concept or object of the active
process (item on which the activity, operation or process
takes place).
6. 1 0.3, what is the means of accomplishment or how is the
active concept achieved (technique, method, apparatus,
operation or process).
6. 10.4 what is the environment in which the active concept
takes place (medium, location).
6.10.5 what are the independent (controlled) and depend-
ent variables?
6.1 1 questions 6.10.1 to 6.10.3 should preferably also be
answered in the title.
7 Abstract
7.1 Abstracts of no more than 200 words should be pro-
vided in English and Afrikaans. Abstracts are of great
importance and should convey the essence of the article.
7.2 They should refer to the geographical area concerned
and, in taxonomic articles, mention the number of taxa
treated. They should not contain information not appear-
ing in the article. K
7.3 In articles dealing with taxonomy or closely related
subjects all taxa from the rank of genus downwards should
be accompanied by their author citations.
7.4 Names of new taxa and new combinations should not
be underlined. If the article deals with too many taxa only
the important ones should be mentioned.
8 Table of contents
A table of contents should be given for all articles
longer than about 15 typed pages, unless they follow the
strict format of a taxonomic revision.
9 Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements should be kept to the minimum
compatible with the requirements of courtesy. Please give
all the initials of the person(s) you are thanking.
1 0 Literature references
In text
10.1 Literature references in the text should be cited as
follows: ‘Jones & Smith (1986) stated...’, or ‘...(Jones &
Smith 1986)’ or (Ellis 1988: 67) when giving a reference
simply as authority for a statement. For treatment of litera-
ture references in taxonomic papers see 14.
10.2 When more than two authors are involved in the
paper use the name of the first author followed by et al.
10.3 When referring to more than one literature reference,
they should be arranged chronologically and separated by
a semicolon, e.g. (Nixon 1940; Davis 1976; Anon. 1981, 1984).
1 0.4 Titles of books and names of journals should prefer-
ably not be mentioned in the text. If there is good reason
for doing so, they should be treated as described in 10.12
& 10.13.
10.5 Personal communications are given only in the text,
not in the list of references. Please add the person’s full
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
279
initials to identify the person more positively, e.g. C.
Boucher pers. comm.
In References at end of article
1 0.6 References of the same author are arranged in chrono-
logical sequence.
1 0.7 Where two or more references by the same author are
listed in succession, the author’s name is repeated with
every reference, except in an obituary, where the name
of the deceased in the list of publications (not in the
references) is replaced by an N dash.
10.8 All publications referred to in the text, including
those mentioned in full in the treatment of correct
names in taxonomic papers, but no others, and no per-
sonal communications, are listed at the end of the manu-
script under the heading References.
1 0.9 The references are arranged alphabetically according
to authors and chronologically under each author, with a,
b, c, etc. added to the year, if the author has published more
than one work in a year.
1 0. 1 0 If an author has published both on his own and as a
senior author with others, the solo publications are listed
first and after that, in strict alphabetical sequence, those
published with one or more other authors.
10.11 Author names are typed in capitals.
10.12 Titles of journals and of books are written out in full
and are underlined as follows: Transactions of the Linnean
Society of London 5: 1 7 1 -2 1 7, or Biology and ecology of
weeds : 24.
10.13 Titles of books should be given as in Taxonomic
literature , edn 2 by Stafleu & Cowan and names of jour-
nals as in the latest edition of World list of scientific
periodicals.
1 0. 14 If the same author is mentioned more than once, the
name is written out in full and not replaced by a line.
10.15 Examples of references:
Collective book or Flora
BROWN. N.E. 1909. Asclepiadaceae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora
capensis 6,2: 518-1036. Reeve, London.
CUNNINGHAM, A.B. 1994. Combining skills: participatory ap-
proaches in biodiversity conservation. In B.J. Huntley, Botanical
diversity in southern Africa. Strelitzia 1: 149-167. National Botanical
Institute, Pretoria.
Book
DU TOIT, A.L. 1966. Geology of South Africa, 3rd edn, S.M. Haughton
(ed.). Oliver & Boyd, London.
HUTCHINSON, J. 1946. A botanist in southern Africa. Gawthorn,
London.
Journal
DAVIS, G. 1988. Description of a proteoid-restioid stand in Mesic
Mountain Fynbos of the southwestern Cape and some aspects of its
ecology. Bothalia 18: 279-287.
SMOOK, L. & GIBBS RUSSELL. G.E. 1985. Poaceae. Memoirs of the
Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 5 1 : 45-70.
STEBBINS, G.L. Jr 1952. Aridity as a stimulus to plant evolution.
American Naturalist 86: 35 — 44.
In press, in preparation
TAYLOR, H.C. in press. A reconnaissance of the vegetation of Rooiberg
State Forest. Technical Bulletin, Department of Forestry.
VOGEL, J.C. 1982. The age of the the Kuiseb river silt terrace at Homeb.
Palaeoecology of Africa 15. In press.
WEISSER, P.J., GARLAND, J.F. & DREWS, B.K. in prep. Dune ad-
vancement 1937-1977 and preliminary vegetation succession chronol-
ogy at Mlalazi Nature Reserve, Natal, South Africa. Bothalia.
Thesis
KRUGER, F.J. 1974. The physiography and plant communities of the
Jakkalsrivier Catchment. M.Sc. (Forestry) thesis. University of Stellen-
bosch.
MUNDAY, J. 1980. The genus Monechma Hochst. ( Acanthaceae tribe
Justiciae) in southern Africa. M.Sc. thesis. University of the Witwaters-
rand, Johannesburg.
Miscellaneous paper, report, unpublished article, tech-
nical note, congress proceedings
ANON, no date. Eetbare plante van die Wolkberg. Botanical Research
Unit, Grahamstown. Unpublished.
BAWDEN, M.G. & CARROL, DM. 1968. The land resources of Leso-
tho. Land Resources Study No. 3, Land Resources Division, Directorate
of Overseas Surveys, Tolworth.
BOUCHER, C. 1981. Contributions of the Botanical Research Institute.
In A.E.F. Heydorn, Proceedings of workshop research in Cape estuaries:
105-107. National Research Institute for Oceanology, CSIR, Stellen-
bosch.
NATIONAL BUILDING RESEARCH INSTITUTE 1959. Report of the
committee on the protection of building timbers in South Africa against
termites, woodboring beetles and fungi, 2nd edn. CSIR Research Report
No. 169.
1 1 Tables
1 1 . 1 Each table should be presented on a separate sheet
and be assigned an Arabic numeral, i.e. the first table
mentioned in the text is marked ‘Table 1 ’.
1 1 .2 In the captions of tables the word ‘table’ is written in
capital letters. See recent numbers of Bothalia for the
format required.
1 1 .3 Avoid vertical lines, if at all possible. Tables can often
be reduced in width by interchanging primary horizontal
and vertical heads.
12 Figures
12.1 Figures should be planned to fit, after reduction, into
a width of either 80, 118 or 165 mm, with a maximum
vertical length of 230 mm. Allow space for the caption
in the case of figures that will occupy a whole page.
12.2 Line drawings, including graphs and diagrams,
should be in jet-black Indian ink, preferably on fine Felix
Schoeller parole or similar board, 200 gsm, or tracing film.
Lines should be bold enough and letters/symbols large
enough to stand reduction.
12.3 It is recommended that drawings should be twice the
size of the final reproduction.
280
Bothalia 25,2 ( 1995)
1 2.4 Photographs should be of excellent quality on glossy
paper with clear detail and moderate contrast, and they
should be the same size as required in the journal.
12.5 Photograph mosaics should be submitted complete,
the component photographs mounted neatly on a white
flexible card base (can be curved around drum of scan-
ner) base leaving a narrow gap of uniform width (2 mm)
between each print. Note that grouping photo- graphs of
markedly divergent contrast results in poor reproductions.
12.6 Lettering and numbering on all figures should be
done in letraset, stencilling or a comparable method. If
symbols are to be placed on a dark background it is
recommended that black symbols are used on a small
white disk ± 7 mm in diameter and placed in the lower left
hand corner of the relevant photo.
12.7 If several illustrations are treated as components of a
single composite figure they should be designated by
capital letters.
12.8 Note that the word ‘Figure’ should be written out in
full, both in the text and the captions and should begin with
a capital ‘F’ (but see 14.7 for taxonomic papers).
12.9 In the text the figure reference is then written as in the
following example: ‘The stamens (Figure 4A, B, C) are...’
12.10 In captions, ‘figure’ is written in capital letters.
Magnification of figures should be given for the size as
submitted.
12.11 Scale bars or scale lines should be used on figures.
12.12 In figures accompanying taxonomic papers, vou-
cher specimens should be given in the relevant caption.
12.13 Figures are numbered consecutively with Arabic
numerals in the order they are referred to in the text.
These numbers, as well as the author's name and an
indication of the top of the figure, must be written in soft
pencil on the back of all figures.
12.14 Captions of figures must not be pasted under the
photograph or drawing.
12.15 Authors should indicate in pencil in the text where
they would like the figures to appear.
12.16 Authors wishing to have the originals of figures re-
turned must inform the editor in the original covering letter
and must mark each original 'To be returned to author’.
12.17 Authors wishing to use illustrations already publish-
ed must obtain written permission before submitting the
manuscript and inform the editor of this fact.
12.18 Captions for figures should be collected together
and typed on a separate sheet headed Captions for figures.
12. 19 It is strongly recommended that taxonomic articles
include dot maps, as figures, to show the distribution of
taxa. The dots used must be large enough to stand reduc-
tion to 80 mm (recommended size: letraset 5 mm diame-
ter). No open diamonds or open triangles should be
used.
12.20 Blank distribution maps of southern Africa, Af-
rica and the world are available from the bookshop,
NBI Pretoria.
13 Text
13.1 As a rule, authors should use the plant names (but
not of all authors of plant names — see 13.6) as listed by
T.H. Arnold & B.C. de Wet (eds) in Memoirs of the
Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 62.
13.2 Names of genera and infrageneric taxa are usually
underlined, with the author citation (where relevant) not
underlined. Exceptions include names of new taxa in the
abstract, correct names given in the synopsis or in para-
graphs on species excluded from a given supraspecific
group in taxonomic articles; in checklists and in indices,
where the position is reversed, correct names are not
underlined and synonyms are underlined.
13.3 Names above generic level are not underlined.
13.4 In articles dealing with taxonomy and closely related
subjects the complete scientific name of a plant (with author
citation) should be given at the first mention in the text. The
generic name should be abbreviated to the initial thereafter,
except where intervening references to other genera with the
same initial could cause confusion (see 16.6).
13.5 In normal text, Latin words are italicized, but in the
synopsis of a species, Latin words such as nom. nud. et al.
are not italicized (see 16.4).
13.6 Names of authors of plant names should agree
with the list published by the Royal Botanic Gardens,
Kew, entitled, Authors of plant names , edited by R.K.
Brummitt & C.E. Powell (1992).
13.7 Modem authors not included in the list should use
their full name and initials when publishing new plant
names. Other author names not in the list should be in
agreement with the recommendations of the Code.
13.8 Names of authors of publications are written out in
full except in the synonymy in taxonomic articles where
they are treated like names of authors of plant names.
13.9 Names of plant collectors are underlined whenever
they are linked to the number of a specimen. The collec-
tion number is also underlined, e.g. Acocks 14407.
1 3. 10 Surnames beginning with ‘De’, ‘Du’ or ‘Van’ begin
with a capial letter unless preceded by an initial.
13.11 For measurements use only units of the International
System of Units (SI). In taxonomic papers only mm and
m, should be used; in ecological papers cm or m should
be used.
13.12 The use of ‘±’ is preferred to c. or ca (see 17.7).
13.13 Numbers ‘one’ to ‘nine’ are spelled out in normal text,
and from 10 onwards they are written in Arabic numerals.
1 3. 1 4 In descriptions of plants, numerals are used through-
out. Write 2. 0-4. 5 (not 2—4.5). When counting members
write 2 or 3 (not 2-3) but 2-\.
13.15 Abbreviations should be used sparingly but con-
sistently. No full stops are placed after abbreviations end-
ing with the last letter of the full word (e.g. edition = edn;
editor = ed.), after units of measure, after compass direc-
tions and after herbarium designations.
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
281
13.16 Apart from multi-access keys, indented keys should
be used with couplets numbered la-lb, 2a-2b, etc. (with-
out full stops thereafter).
13.17 Keys consisting of a single couplet have no number-
ing.
13.18 Manuscripts of keys should be presented as in the
following example:
la Leaves closely arranged on an elongated stem; a sub-
merged aquatic with only the capitula exserted ... lb. E.
setaceum var. pumilum
1 b Leaves in basal rosettes; stems suppressed; small
marsh plants, ruderals or rarely aquatics;
2a Annuals, small, fast-growing pioneers, dying when
the habitat dries up; capitula without coarse white setae;
receptacles cylindrical:
3a Anthers white ... 2. E. cinereum
3b Anthers black ... 3. E. nigrum
2b Perennials, more robust plants; capitula sparsely to
densely covered with short setae:
13.19 Herbarium voucher specimens should be referred to
wherever possible, not only in taxonomic articles.
14 Species treatment in taxonomic papers
14.1 The procedure to be followed is illustrated in the
example (17.9), which should be referred to, because not
all steps are described in full detail.
14.2 The correct name (not underlined) is to be followed
by its author citation (underlined) and the full literature
reference, with the name of the publication written out in
full (not underlined).
14.3 Thereafter all literature references, including those of
the synonyms, should only reflect author, page and year
of publication, e.g. C.E. Hubb. in Kew Bulletin 15: 307
( 1960); Boris et al. : 14 (1966); Boris: 89 ( 1967); Sims: t.
38 (1977); Sims: 67 (1980).
14.4 The description and the discussion should consist of
paragraphs commencing, where possible, with italicized
leader words such as flowering time, diagnostic charac-
ters, distribution and habitat.
14.5 When more than one species of a given genus is dealt
with in a paper, the correct name of each species should
be prefixed by a sequential number followed by a full stop,
the first line of the paragraph to be indented. Infraspecific
taxa are marked with small letters, e.g. lb., 12c., etc.
14.6 Names of authors are written as in 13.6, irrespective
of whether the person in question is cited as the author of
a plant name or of a publication.
14.7 The word ‘figure’ is written as ‘fig.’, and ‘t.’ is used
for both ‘plate’ and ‘tablet’ (but see 12.8 for normal text).
14.8 Literature references providing good illustrations of
the species in question may be cited in a paragraph com-
mencing with the word leones followed by a colon. This
paragraph is given after the last paragraph of the syn-
onymy, see 17.9.
15 Citation of specimens
15.1 Type specimen in synopsis: the following should be
given (if available): country (if not in RSA), province, grid
reference (at least for new taxa), locality as given by
original collector, modem equivalent of collecting locality
in square brackets (if relevant, e.g. Port Natal |now Dur-
ban]), quarter-degree square, date of collection (op-
tional), collector’s name and collecting number (both
underlined).
15.2 The abbreviation s.n. ( sine numero) is given after the
name of a collector who usually assigned numbers to his
collections but did not do so in the specimen in question.
The herbaria in which the relevant type(s) are housed are
indicated by means of the abbreviations given in the latest
edition of Index Herbariorum.
15.3 The holotype (holo.) and its location are mentioned
first, followed by a semicolon, the other herbaria are
arranged alphabetically, separated by commas.
15.4 Authors should indicate by means of an exclamation
mark ( ! ) which of the types have been personally examined.
15.5 If only a photograph or microfiche was seen, write as
follows: Anon. 422 (X, holo.-BOL, photo.!).
15.6 Lectotypes or neotypes should be chosen for correct
names without a holotype. It is not necessary to lectotypify
synonyms.
15.7 When a lectotype or a neotype are newly chosen, this
should be indicated by using the phrase ‘here designated’
(see 17.9). If reference is made to a previously selected
lectotype or neotype, the name of the designating author
and the literature reference should be given. In cases where
no type was cited, and none has subsequently been nomi-
nated, this may be stated as ‘not designated’.
15.8 In brief papers mentioning only a few species and a
few cited specimens the specimens should be arranged
according to the grid reference system: Provinces/ coun-
tries (typed in capitals) should be cited in the following
order: Namibia, Botswana, Northern Province (pre-
viously Northern Transvaal), North-West, Gauteng (pre-
viously PWV), Eastern Transvaal, Free State (previously
Orange Free State), Swaziland, KwaZulu-Natal, Lesotho,
and Northern Cape, Western Cape and Eastern Cape (see
Figure 1, p. 283).
15.9 Grid references should be cited in numerical se-
quence.
15.10 Focality records for specimens should preferably be
given to within a quarter-degree square. Records from the
same one-degree square are given in alphabetical order, i.e
(-AC) precedes (-AD), etc. Records from the same quar-
ter-degree square are arranged alphabetically according to
the collectors’ names; the quarter-degree references must
be repeated for each specimen cited.
15.11 The relevant international code of the herbaria in which
a collection was seen should be given in brackets after the
collection number; the codes are separated by commas. The
following example will explain the procedure:
KWAZULU-NATAL.— 2731 (Louwsburg): 16kmEofNongoma,(-DD),
Pelser 354 (BM, K, PRE); near Dwarsrand, Van der Merwe 4789 (BOL.
M). 2829 (Harrismith): near Groothoek, (-AB), Smith 234\ Koffiefon-
tein, (-AB), Taylor 720 (PRE); Cathedral Peak Forest Station, (-CC),
282
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
Marriot 74 (KMG); Wilgerfontein, Roux 426. Grid ref. unknown: Sterk-
stroom, Strydom 12 (NBG).
15.12 For records from outside southern Africa authors
should use degree squares without names, e.g.:
KENYA. — 0136: Nairobi plains beyond race course, Napier 485.
15.13 Monographs and revisions: in the case of all major
works of this nature it is assumed that the author has investi-
gated the relevant material in all major herbaria and that he
has provided the specimens seen with determinavit labels. It
is assumed further that the author has submitted distribution
maps for all relevant taxa and that the distribution has been
described briefly in words in the text. Under the heading
"Vouchers' no more than five specimens should be cited,
indicating merely the collector and the collector’s number
(both underlined). Specimens are alphabetically arranged
according to collector’s name. If more than one specimen by
the same collector is cited, they are arranged numerically and
separated by a comma. The purpose of the cited specimens
is not to indicate distribution but to convey the author’s
concept of the taxon in question.
15. 14 The herbaria in which the specimens are housed are
indicated by means of the abbreviation given in the latest
edition of Index Herbariorum . They are given between
brackets, arranged alphabetically and separated by com-
mas behind every specimen as in the following example:
Vouchers: T.H. Arnold 64 (PRE); Fisher 840 (NH, NU, PRE); Flanagan
831 (GRA, PRE), 840 (NH, PRE); Marloth 4926 (PRE, STE); Schelpe
616 1, 6163, 6405 (BOL); Schlechter 445 1 (BM, BOL, GRA, K, PRE).
15.15 If long lists of specimens are given, they must be listed
together before Acknowledgements under the heading Speci-
mens examined. They are arranged alphabetically by the
collector’s name and then numerically foreach collector. The
species is indicated in brackets by the number that was
assigned to it in the text and any infraspecific taxa by a small
letter. If more than one genus is dealt with in a given article,
the first species of the first genus men- tioned is indicated as
1.1. This is followed by the international herbarium designa-
tion. Note that the name of the collector and the collection
number are underlined:
Acocks 12497 (2.1b) BM, K, PRE; 14724 (1.13a) BOL, K, P. Archer
1507 (1.4) BM, G. Burchell 2847 (2.8c) MB, K. Burman2401 (3.3) MO,
S. B.L. Burtt 789 (2.6) B, KMG, STE.
1 6 Synonyms
1 6. 1 In a monograph or a revision covering all of southern
Africa, all synonyms based on types of southern African
origin, or used in southern African literature, should be
included.
16.2 Illegitimate names are designated by nom. illeg. after
the reference, followed by non with the author and date, if
there is an earlier homonym.
16.3 Nomina nuda ( nom. nud.) and in validly published
names are excluded unless there is a special reason to cite
them, for example if they have been used in prominent
publications.
16.4 In normal text Latin words are italicized, but in the
synopsis of a species Latin words such as nom. nud. are
not italicized (see 13.5).
16.5 Synonyms should be arranged chronologically into
groups of nomenclatural synonyms, i.e. synonyms based
on the same type, and the groups should be arranged
chronologically by basionyms, except for the basionym of
the correct name which is dealt with in the paragraph
directly after that of the correct name.
16.6 When a generic name is repeated in a given synony-
my it should be abbreviated to the initial, except where
intervening references to other genera with the same initial
could cause confusion (see 13.4).
1 7 Description and example of species treatment
17.1 Descriptions of all taxa of higher plants should, where
possible, follow the sequence: Habit; sexuality; under-
ground parts (if relevant). Indumentum (if it can be easily
described for the whole plant). Stems/branches. Bark.
Leaves', arrangement, petiole absent/present, pubescence;
blade; shape, size, apex, base, margin; midrib: above/
below, texture, colour; petiole; stipules. Inflorescence'.
type, shape, position; bracts/bracteoles. Flowers : shape,
sex. Receptacle. Calyx. Corolla. Disc. Androecium. Gyno-
ecium. Fruit. Seeds. Chromosome number. Figure (word
written out in full) number.
17.2 As a rule, shape should be given before measure-
ments.
1 7.3 In general, if an organ has more than one of the parts
being described, use the plural, otherwise use the singular,
for example, petals of a flower but blade of a leaf.
17.4 Language must be as concise as possible, using
participles instead of verbs.
17.5 Dimension ranges should be cited as in 17.9.
17.6 Care must be exercised in the use of dashes and
hyphens. A hyphen is a short stroke joining two syllables
of a word, e.g. ovate-lanceolate or sea-green, with no
space between the letter and the stroke. An N-dash (en) is
a longer stroke commonly used instead of the word ‘to’
between numerals, '2-5 mm long’ (do not use it between
words but rather use the word ‘to’, e.g. ‘ovate to lanceo-
late’); it is produced by typing three hyphens next to each
other. An M-dash (em) is a stroke longer than an N-dash
and is used variously, e.g. in front of a subspecific epithet
in stead of the full species name; it is produced by typing
two hyphens next to one another.
17.7 The use of ‘±’ is preferred to c. or ca when describing
shape, measurements, dimensions, etc. (see 13.12).
1 7.8 The decimal point replaces the comma in all units
of measurement, e.g. leaves 1.0-1. 5 mm long.
17.9 Example:
I. Bequaertiodendron magalismontanum (Sand.) Heine &
Hemsl. in Kew Bulletin: 307 (I960); Codd: 72 (1964); Elsdon: 75 ( 1980).
Type: Gauteng, Magaliesberg, Zeyher 1849 (S, holo.-BOL, photo.!).
Chrysophyllum magalismontanum Sond.: 721 (1850); Harv.: 812
(1867); Engl.: 434 ( 1904); Bottmar: 34 ( 1919). Zeyherella magalismon-
tana (Sond.) Aubrev. & Pellegr.: 105 (1958); Justin: ( 1973).
Chrysophyllum argyrophyllum Hiern: 721 (1850); Engl.: 43 (1904).
Boivinella argyrophylla (Hiern) Aubrev. & Pellegr.: 37 ( 1958); Justin: 98
(1973). Types: Angola, Welwitsch 4828 (BM!, lecto., here designated;
PRE!); Angola, Welwitsch 4872 (BM!).
Bothalia 25,2 (1995)
283
Chrysophyl turn wilmsii Engl.: 4, t. 16 (1904); Masonet: 77 (1923);
Woodson: 244 (1937). Boivinella wilmsii (Engl.) Aubrev. & Pellegr.: 39
(1958); Justin: 99 (1973). Type: Eastern Transvaal, Magoebaskloof,
Wilms 1812 (B, holo.f; K!, P!, lecto., designated by Aubrev. & Pellegr.:
38 (1958), PRE!, S!, W!,Z!).
Bequaertiodendron fruticosa De Wild.: 37 (1923), non Bonpl.: 590
(1823); D. Bakker: 167 (1929); H. Fr.: 302 (1938); Davy: 640 (1954);
Breytenbach: 117 (1959); Clausen: 720(1968); Palmer: 34(1969). Type:
Eastern Transvaal, Tzaneen Dist., Granville 3665 (K, holo. ! ; G!, P!,
PRE!, S!).
B. fragrans auct. non Oldemann: Glover: 149, t. 19 (1915); Henkel:
226 (1934); Stapelton: 6 (1954).
leones: Harv.: 812 (1867); Henkel: t. 84 (1934?; Codd: 73 (1964);
Palmer: 35 (1969).
Woody perennial; main branches up to 0.4 m long,
erect or decumbent, grey woolly-felted, leafy. Leaves
linear to oblanceolate, 3— 10(— 23) ± 1.0-1 .5(^4 0) mm,
obtuse, base broad, half-clasping Heads heterogamous,
campanulate, 7-8 ± 5 mm, solitary, sessile at tip of
axillary shoots; involucral bracts in 5 or 6 series, inner
exceeding flowers, tips subopaque, white, very acute.
Receptacle nearly smooth. Flowers ± 23-30, 7-11
male, 16-21 bisexual, yellow, tipped pink. Achenes ±
0.75 mm long, elliptic. Pappus bristles very many,
equalling corolla, scabridulous. Chromosome number.
2n = 22. Figure 23B.
1 8 New taxa
18.1 The name of a new taxon must be accompanied by at
least a Latin diagnosis. Authors should not provide full-
length Latin descriptions unless they have the required
expertise in Latin at their disposal.
18.2 It is recommended that descriptions of new taxa be
accompanied by a good illustration (line drawing or pho-
tograph) and a distribution map.
18.3 Example:
109. Helichrysum jubilatum Hilliard , sp. nov. H.
alsinoidei DC. affinis, sed foliis ellipticis (nec spatulatis),
inflorescentiis compositis a foliis non circumcinctis, flori-
bus femineis numero quasi dimidium hermaphroditorum
aequantibus (nec capitulis homogamis vel floribus
femineis 1-3 tantum) distinguitur.
Herba annua e basi ramosa; caules erecti vel decumben-
tes, 100-250 mm longi, tenuiter albo-lanati, remote foliati.
Folia plerumque 8-30 ±5-15 mm, sub capitulis minora,
elliptica vel oblanceolata, obtusa vel acuta, mucronata, basi
semi-amplexicauli, utrinque cano-lanato- arachnoidea. Capit-
ula heterogama, campanulata, 3.5^40 ± 2.5 mm, pro parte
maxima in paniculas cymosas terminales aggregata; capitula
subterminalia interdum solitaria vel 2-3 ad apices ramulorum
nudorum ad 30 mm longorum. Bracteae involucrales 5-se-
riatae, gradatae, exteriores pellucidae, pallide stramineae,
dorso lanatae, seriebus duabus interioribus subaequalibus et
flores quasi aequantibus, apicibus obtusis opacis niveis vix
radiantibus. Receptaculum fere laeve. Flores ± 35—41 . Ache-
nia 0.75 mm longa, pilis myxogenis praedita. Pappi setae
multae, corollam aequantes, apicibus scabridis, basibus non
cohaerentibus.
TYPE. — Northern Cape, 2817 (Vioolsdrif): Richters-
veld, (-CC), ± 5 miles E of Lekkersing on road to Stink-
fontein, kloof in hill south of road, annual, disc whitish,
7-11-1962, Nordenstam 1823 (S, holo.; E, NH, PRE).
19 New provinces of South Africa (Oct. 1995)
FIGURE 1. — I, Western Cape; 2, Eastern Cape; 3, Northern Cape; 4,
Free State (previously Orange Free State); 5, KwaZulu-Natal; 6,
North-West (previously northeastern Cape and southwestern
Transvaal); 7, Gauteng (previously PWV); 8, Eastern Transvaal;
9, Northern Province (previously Northern Transvaal).
20 Proofs
Only page proofs are normally sent to authors. They
should be corrected in red ink and be returned to the editor
as soon as possible.
21 Reprints
Authors receive 100 reprints free. If there is more than
one author, this number will have to be shared between
them.
22 Documents consulted
Guides to authors of the following publications were
made use of in the compilation of the present guide: An-
nals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. Botanical Journal
of the Linnean Society, Flora of Australia, Smithsonian
Contributions to Botany, South African Journal of Botany
(including instructions to authors of taxonomic papers),
South African Journal of Science.
23 Address of editor
Manuscripts should be submitted to: The Editor,
Bothalia, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XI 01,
Pretoria 000 1 .
24 FSA contributions
24. 1 Figures and text must conform to Bothalia format.
24.2 These articles will be considered as a full contribu-
tion to the Flora of southern Africa and will be listed as
published in the ‘Plan of Flora of southern Africa ’, which
appears in all issues of the FSA series.
284
Bothalia 25,2 ( 1995)
INDEX
abbreviation, 13.4, 13.5, 13.12, 13.15, 14.7, 15.2, 15.14, 16.2, 16.3, 16.4,
16.6
abstract (uittreksel), 3.2, 7, 13.2
acknowledgements, 9
address of
authors, 3.3, 4
editor, 23
alphabetical, 6, 10.3, 10.9, 10.10, 15.3, 15.10, 15.13, 15.14, 15.15
Arabic numerals, 11.1, 12.13, 13.3
ARNOLD, T.H. & DE WET, B.C. (eds) 1993. Plants of southern Africa:
names and distribution. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South
Africa No. 62, 13.1
ASCII, 2.1
author(s), 1,3.1, 4, 10.15, 12.15
address, 3.3, 4
citation, 5, 7.3, 13.2, 13.4, 14.2
first, 10.2
names, 3.3, 10.3, 10.7, 10.9, 10.11, 10.14, 12.13, 13.7, 13.8, 14.3,
14.6, 15.7, 16.2
names of plant names, 13.6, 13.7, 13.8
senior, 10.10
book reviews, 1, 3.4
books, 10.4, 10.12, 10.13, 10.15
Bothalia, 1,3.2, 11.2, 22
brief taxonomic articles, 15.8
BRUMMITT, R.K. & POWELL, C.E. (eds) 1992. Authors of plant
names. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 13.6
c„ 13.2, 17.7
ca, 13.2, 17.7
Cape, 15.8, 18.3, 19
capitals, 11.2, 12.7, 12.10, 14.2, 15.8
captions, 3.1, 3.4, 3.5, 11.2, 12.8, 12.10, 12.12, 12.14, 12.18
checklist, 13.2
chromosome number, 17.1, 17.9
chronological sequence, 10.3, 10.6, 10.9, 16.5
citation
author, 5, 7.3, 13.2, 13.4, 14.2
literature, 14.4
of specimens, 15
cm, 13.11
collection
date, 15.1
number, 13.9, 15.1, 15.2, 15.11, 15.13, 15.15
collective book, 10.15
collector, 13.9, 15.1, 15.2, 15.10, 15.13, 15.15
colon, 2.13
comma, 2.13, 15.13
compass directions, 13.15
composite figure, 12.7
congress proceedings, 1 0. 1 5
contents, 8
correspondence, 4
countries, 6.7, 15.8
decimal point, 17.8
description and example of species treatment, 1 7
diagrams, 12.2
discussion, 3.4, 14.4
diskette, 1 , 2, 2.4
distribution maps, 12.19, 12.20, 15.13, 18.2
documents consulted, 22
dot maps, 12.19, 12.20, 15.13, 18.2
double
line spacing, 2.4
space, 3.1, 2.13
drawing paper, 12.2
drawings, 12.2
edition, 13.15
editor, 1 3.15, 22
editorial
board, 1
policy, 1
etui, 10.2, 13.6, 14.3
example of
new taxa, 1 8.3
species treatment, 17.9
exclamation mark, 2.13, 15.4
family name, 5, 6.7
fig., 14.7
figure(s), 12, 14.7, 17.1
reduction of, 12.1, 12.2, 12.19
returned, 12.16
first author, 10.2
flora, I, 10.15
Flora of southern Africa , 24
footnote, 3.3
Free State (previously Orange Free State), 15.8, 19
FSA contributions, 24
full stop, 2.13, 13.15, 13.16, 14.5
Gauteng (previously PWV), 15.8, 17.9, 19
genera, 13.2
generic name, 13.3, 13.4, 16.6
geographical area, 7.2
granting agencies, 3.3
graphs, 12.2
grid reference system, 15.1, 15.8, 15.9, 15.11
headings, 2.7, 2.9
sequence of, 3.3, 3.4
herbaria, 15.2, L5.3, 15.11, 15.13, 15.14
herbarium
code, 15.1 1
designations, 13.15, 15.15
voucher specimens, 12.12, 13.19
here designated, 15.7, 17.9
holo., 15.5, 17.9, 18.3
holotype, 15.3, 15.6
homonym, 16.2
hyphenated words, 2.6
hyphen, 2.10-2.12, 17.6
IBM compatible, 2.1
icones, 10.2, 17.9
illegitimate names (nom. illeg.), 16.2
illustrations, 12.3, 12.7, 12.17, 14.8
previously published, 12.17
Index Herbariorum, 15.2, 15.14
index of names, 3.4
infrageneric taxa, 13.2
initials, 9, 10.5, 13.7
in prep., 10.15
in preparation, 10. 15
in press, 10. 15
International
Code of Botanical Nomenclature, 13.7
System of Units (SI), 13.1 1
invalidly published names, 16.3
italics/underlining, 7.4, 10.12, 13.2, 13.3, 13.5, 13.9, 14.2, 15.1, 15.13,
15.15
journals, 10.4, 10.12, 10.15
names of, 10.1, 10.13
justify, 2.5
keys, 2.7, 2.16, 13.16, 13.17, 13.18
keywords, 3.3, 3.4, 6
KwaZulu-Natal (previously Natal), 15.8, 19
Latin, 13.5, 15.2, 16.2, 16.3, 16.4
descriptions, 18.1
layout, 3.2
lecto., 15.6, 15.7, 17.9
lectotype, 15.6, 15.7, 17.9
letraset, 12.6, 12.19
lettering, 12.6
line
drawings, 12.2, 18.2
spacing, 2.4, 2.9
literature
citations, 14.4
references, 3.1, 10, 10.7
within synonymy, 10.7, 14.8
localities outside southern Africa, 15.12
Bothalia 25,2 ( 1995)
285
locality, 15.1, 15.10
m, 13.11
Macintosh, 2.1
magnification of figures, 12.3, 12.10
manuscript
language, 1
requirements, 3
map, distribution, dot, 12.19, 12.20, 15.13, 18.2, 19
M-dash, 2.12, 17.6
mm, 13.1 1
margin, 2.7, 2.16, 3.1, 17.1
material, 3.3, 3.4
measurements, 13.11, 17.2, 17.7, 17.8
methods, 3.4, 6.10.3
microfiche, 15.5
miscellaneous paper, 10.15
monograph, 3.4, 15.13, 16.1
MSWord5, 2.1
name
collector’s, 15. 10
illegitimate, 16.2
invalidly published, 16.3
name(s)
of author(s), 3.3, 10.7, 10.9, 10.11, 10.14, 13.7, 13.8, 14.6
of authors of plant names, 5, 13.1, 13.2, 13.6, 14.6
of publications, 13.8
Natal, see KwaZulu-Natal, 15.8, 19
plant collectors, 1 3.9
provinces of South Africa, 19
publication, 14.2
taxa, 2.16, 5, 7.4, 10.8, 13.2, 13.3
N-dash, 2.11, 17.6
neotype, 15.6, 15.7
new
combinations, 7.4
provinces of South Africa (May 1994), 19
taxa, 7.4, 13.2, 13.7, 15.7, 18
nom. illeg., 16.2
nom. nud., 13.5, 16.3, 16.4
Northern Province, see Northern Transvaal. 15.8, 19
North-West, 15.8, 19
notes, 1, 3.4, 10. 15
technical, 10.15
number
chromosome, 17.1, 17.9
page, 2.2
numbering, 13.13
figures, 12.6, 12.13, 17.1
keys, 13.16, 13.17
pages, 3.5, 13.4
taxa, 2.16,7.2, 13.4, 14.5, 15.15
numerals, Arabic, 11.1, 12.13, 13.3
Orange Free State, 15.8, 19
page charges, 1.2
PC diskettes, 1, 2
pers. comm.. 10.5
personal communications (pers. comm.), 10.5, 10.8
photocopies, 3.1
photograph, 12.4, 12.14, 15.5, 18.2
mosaic, 12.5
plant name, 5, 13.4, 13.6, 13.7, 13.8, 14.6
plate (t.), 14.7
prepositions, 6.4
proceedings, 10.15
proofs, 20
provinces, 6.7, 15.1, 15.8, 19
publications, 10.8, 13.8, 14.3
name of, 14.2
solo, 10.10
year of, 10.9, 14.3
PWV, see Gauteng, 15.8, 19
quarter-degree squares, 15.1, 15.10
quotes, 2.15
reduction of figures, 12.1, 12.2, 12.19
referees, 1
reference, 3.4, 10.6, 10.7, 10.9, 10.15
figure, 12.9
grid, 15.1, 15.8, 15.9, 15.11
list, 10.5, 10.8, 10.9
literature, 3.1, 10, 10.7
report, 10.15
reprints, 21
requirements for
diskette, 2
manuscript, 3
results, 3.4
revision, 3.4, 8, 15.13, 16.1
scale bar, 12.1 1
semicolon, 2.13, 10.3, 15.3, 15.13
senior author, 10.10
sequence of headings, 3.3, 3.4
short notes, 1, 3.4
single line spacing, 2.4
special character, 3.7
species treatment in taxonomic papers, 14
specimens examined, 3.4, 15.5
square brackets, 15.1
STAFLEU, F.A. & COWAN, R.S. 1976-1988. Taxonomic literature.
Vols 1-7, 10.13
stiffies, 1
surnames, 13.10
symbols, 12.6
synopsis, 13.2, 13.5, 15.1, 16.4
synonymy, 10.7, 13.8, 14.4, 14.8, 16.6
t„ 14.3, 14.7, 17.9
table, 2.3, 3. 1,3.4, 3.5, 11
of contents, 8
tablet (t.), 14.7
taxa
name of, 2.16, 5, 7.4, 10.8, 13.2, 13.3
new, 7.4, 13.2, 13.7, 15.7, 18
numbering of, 2.16, 7.2. 13.4, 14.5, 15.15
taxonomic
articles/papers, 7.2, 10.8, 12.12, 12.19, 13.2, 13.8, 14
revision, 8
taxonomy, 5, 7.3, 13.4, 15.8
technical note, 10.15
text, 3.1, 10.1, 10.4, 10.5, 10.8, 11.1, 12.8, 12.9, 12.13, 12.15, 13, 15.13,
15.15, 16.4
thesis, 10.15
times sign, 2.14
title, 3.3, 5, 6.9, 6.1 1
of books, 10.4, 10.12, 10.13, 10.15
of journals, 10.4, 10.12, 10.13, 10.15
page, 1, 3.3, 3.5
Transvaal, 15.8, 17.9, 19
type, 15.2, 15.4, 15.7, 16.1, 16.6, 17.9
here designated, 15.7, 17.9
not designated, 15.7
specimen, 15.1
underlining/italics, 7.4, 10.12, 13.2, 13.3, 13.5, 13.9, 14.2, 15.1, 15.13, 15.15
uittreksel (abstract), 7.1
units of measure, 13.1 1. 13.15
unpublished article, 10.15
vouchers, 15.13, 15.14
voucher specimens, 12.12, 13.19
Windows Write, 2.1
Word for Windows, 2.1
Word Perfect, 2. 1
World list of scientific periodicals , 10. 13
year of publication, 10.9, 14.3
BO, THALIA
Volume 25,2 Oct./Okt. 1995
CONTENTS— INHOUD
1 . Three subspecies of Pelargonium laevigatum (Geraniaceae). C.M. VAN WYK (nee SCHONKEN) and J.J.A.
VAN DER WALT 133
2. A systematic study of the genus Pseudopentameris (Arundinoideae: Poaceae). N.P. BARKER 141
3. A note on Combretum subgenus Combretum section Macrostigmatea (Combretaceae). E.F. HENNESSY
and S. RODMAN 149
4. New records and new species of Asclepiadaceae from Namibia. P.V. BRUYNS 155
5. An annotated list of Urediniomycetes (rust fungi) from South Africa 1 : Melampsoraceae and Pucciniaceae,
excluding Puccinia and Uromyces. M. VAN REENEN 173
6. Studies in the Marchantiales (Hepaticae) from southern Africa. 9. The genus Marchantia and its five local
species. S.M. PEROLD 183
7. New combinations and a complete list of Asparagus species in southern Africa (Asparagaceae). A.C.
FELLINGHAM and N.L. MEYER 205
8. The taxonomic history of the Ricciaceae (1937-1995) and a classification of sub-Saharan Ricciae. S.M.
PEROLD , 211
9. Notes on African plants:
Author citation ‘ex Krauss’ in nomenclature. B. A. MOMBERG 245
Asteraceae. A note on Ursinia brachyloba. P.P.J. HERMAN 244
Asteraceae. A new combination in Cotula. P.P.J. HERMAN 244
Boraginaceae. Typification of the sections in Lobostemon. M.H. BUYS and J.J.A. VAN DER WALT 233
Cyperaceae. New records for southern Africa and KwaZulu-Natal. J. BROWNING, K.D. GORDON-
GRAY and C.J. WARD 238
Ericaceae. A new species of Erica from the Western Cape. E.G.H. OLIVER 242
Lunulariaceae. Fruiting Lunularia cruciata, now also reported from southern Africa. S.M. PEROLD 239
Podocarpaceae. Notes on Podocarpus in southern Africa and Madagascar. O.A. LEISTNER, G.F.
SMITH and H.F. GLEN 233
Pteridophyta. New distribution records of South African pteridophytes. J.E. BURROWS and N.R.
CROUCH 236
10. The psocid Liposcelis bostrychophilus Badonnel (Psocoptera: Liposcelidae): an occasional herbarium pest.
E. RETIEF, A. NICHOLAS and H. BAIJNATH 247
1 1 . Obituaries: Winsome (Buddy) Barker (1907-1994). J.P ROURKE 255
Alan Percy-Lancaster (1944-1995). G.F. SMITH and H.F. GLEN 259
Friedrich von Breitenbach OMS ( 1916-1995). H.F. GLEN and W.G. WELMAN 260
1 2. National Botanical Institute: list of staff and publications, 3 1 st March 1 995. Compiler: B. A. MOMBERG 265
1 3. Guide for authors to Bothalia 277
Abstracted, indexed or listed in/opgesom, in indeks opgeneem of gelys in: AGRICOLA, Biological Abstracts/Reports, Reviews, and Meetings, BIOSIS
Document Express, Current Advances in Plant Science, Current Contents, Field Crop Abstracts, Forestry Abstracts, Herbage Abstracts, Excerpta
Botanica, Research Alert, Revue of Plant Pathology, Revue of Medical and Veterinary Mycology, Scisearch, and/en The Kew Record of Taxonomic
Literature.
ISSN 0006 8241
© Published by and obtainable from/gcpubliseer deur en verkrygbaar van: National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001, South
Africa/Nasionale Botaniese Instituut, Privaatsak XI 01 . Pretoria 0001, Suid-Afrika. Typesetting/kopieset: S.S. Brink (NBI). Reproduction and printing
by/reproduksie en drukwerk deur: Aurora Printers, P.O. Box 422, Pretoria 0001/Aurora Drukkers, Posbus 422, Pretoria 001 . Tel. (012) 327-5073.