Bothalia
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Vol. 27,1
May 1997
TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE NATIONAL BOTANICAL INSTITUTE,
PRETORIA
Obtainable from the National B otanical Institute, Private Bag X 1 0 1 , Pretoria 000 1 , Republic of South
Africa. A catalogue of all available publications will be issued on request.
BOTHALIA
Bothalia is named in honour of General Louis Botha, first Premier and Minister of Agriculture of the
Union of South Africa. This house journal of the National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, is devoted to
the furtherance of botanical science. The main fields covered are taxonomy, ecology, anatomy and
cytology. Two parts of the journal and an index to contents, authors and subjects are published
annually.
Two booklets of the contents (a) to Vols 1-20 and (b) to Vols 21-25, are available.
STRELITZIA
A series of occasional publications on southern African flora and vegetation, replacing Memoirs of
the Botanical Survey of South Africa and Annals of Kirstenbosch Botanic Gardens.
MEMOIRS OF THE BOTANICAL SURVEY OF SOUTH AFRICA
The memoirs are individual treatises usually of an ecological nature, but sometimes dealing with
taxonomy or economic botany. Published: Nos 1-63 (many out of print). Discontinued after No. 63.
ANNALS OF KIRSTENBOSCH BOTANIC GARDENS
A series devoted to the publication of monographs and major works on southern African flora.
Published: Vols 14-19 (earlier volumes published as Supplementary volumes to the Journal of
South African Botany). Discontinued after Vol. 19.
FLOWERING PLANTS OF AFRICA (FPA)
This serial presents colour plates of African plants with accompanying text. The plates are prepared
mainly by the artists at the National Botanical Institute. Many well known botanical artists have
contributed to the series, such as Cythna Letty (over 700 plates), Kathleen Lansdell, Stella Gower,
Betty Connell, Peter Bally, Fay Anderson, Ellaphie Ward-Hilhorst and Gillian Condy. The Editor is
pleased to receive living plants of general interest or of economic value for illustration.
From Vol. 55, twenty plates are published at irregular intervals.
An index to Vols 1^9 is available.
FLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA (FSA)
A taxonomic treatise on the flora of the Republic of South Africa, Lesotho, Swaziland, Namibia and
Botswana. The FSA contains descriptions of families, genera, species, infraspecific taxa, keys to
genera and species, synonymy, literature and limited specimen citations, as well as taxonomic and
ecological notes.
Contributions to the FSA also appear in Bothalia.
PALAEOFLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA
A palaeollora on a pattern comparable to that of the Flora of southern Africa. Much of the
information is presented in the form of tables and photographic plates depicting fossil populations.
Now available:
Molteno Fonnation (Triassic) Vol. 1. Introduction. Dicroidium, by J.M. & H.M. Anderson.
Molleno Formation (Triassic) Vol. 2. Gymnosperms (excluding Dicroidium), by J.M. &
H.M. Anderson.
Prodromus of South African Megafloras. Devonian to Lower Cretaceous, by J.M. & H.M.
Anderson. Obtainable from: A. A. Balkema Marketing, Box 317, Claremont 7735, RSA.
BOTHALIA
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Volume 27,1
Scientific Editor: O.A. Leistner
Technical Editor: B.A. Momberg
NATIONAL
§8 O T A N I CAL
INSTITUTE
2 Cussonia Avenue, Brummeria, Pretoria
Private Bag X 101, Pretoria 0001
ISSN 0006 8241
May 1997
Editorial Board
D.F. Cutler
B.J. Huntley
P.H. Raven
J.P. Rourke
M.J. Werger
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK
National Botanical Institute, Cape Town, RSA
Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, USA
Compton Herbarium, NBI, Cape Town, RSA
University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
CONTENTS
Volume 27,1
1 . Notes on Plectrantlms (Lamiaceae) from southern Afriea. E. J. VAN JAARS VELD and T.J. EDWARDS 1
2. Live new species of Lachenalia (Hyacinthaceae) from arid areas of South Africa. G.D. DUNCAN . 7
3. Studies in the liverwort genus Fossombronia (Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 1 . Three new species
from Northern Province, Gauteng and Mpumalanga. S.M. PEROLD 17
4. Studies in the liverwort genus Fossombronia (Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 2. An amendment
to three species from Western Cape, described by S.W. Arnell. S.M. PEROLD 29
5. Studies in the liverwort genus Fossombronia (Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 3. An amendment
to F. spinifolia. S.M. PEROLD 39
6. Notes of African plants:
Apiaceae (Umbelliferae). A new name for a South African Peucedanum. B.L. BURTT 51
Asteraceae. New combination in Dicoma. S. ORTIZ, J. RODRIGUEZ-OUBINA and I. PULGAR 48
Boraginaceae. The taxonomic status of Lobostemon horridus. M.H. BUYS and J.J.A. VAN DER
WALT 55
Eabaceae. A survey of antipodals in the gametophyte of the tribes Podalyrieae and Liparieae. A.L.
SCHUTTE 43
Proteaceae. A new species of Leucadendron from the western Little Karoo. J.P. ROURKE .... 52
Rubiaceae. A new species of Vangueria from the Soutpansberg. N. HAHN 45
Thymelaeaceae. New combinations in Lachnaea. J.B.P. BEYERS 45
Vitaceae. A new species of Rhoicissus from the Eastern Cape. E. RETIEE and E. J. VAN
JAARSVELD 49
7. Composition and biogeography of forest patches on the inland mountains of the southern Cape. C.J.
GELDENHUYS 57
8. Cytogenetic studies in some representatives of the subfamily Pooideae (Poaceae) in South Africa. 3.
The tribe Poeae. J.J. SPIES, S.M.C. VAN WYK, I.C. NIEMAN and E.J.L. LIEBENBERG. ... 75
9. Comparative field performance of three different gas exchange systems. G.E. MIDGLEY, M. VESTE,
D.J. VON WILLERT, G.W. DAVIS, M. STEINBERG and L.W. POWRIE 83
10. Obituary: Leslie Charles Leach ( 1909-1996). R.H. ARCHER 91
11. Book reviews 97
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2016
https://archive.org/details/bothaliavolume2727unse
Bothalia27,l: 1-6 (1997)
Notes on Plectranthus (Lamiaceae) from southern Afiica
E.J. VAN JAARSVELD* and T.J. EDWARDS**
Keywords: comb, nov., Lamiaceae, Plectranthus spp., southern Africa, spp. nov., stat. nov., taxonomy
ABSTRACT
Four new Plectranthus taxa from South Africa are described: P malvinus Van Jaarsv. & T.J. Edwards, P. saccatus subsp.
pondoensis Van Jaarsv. & S.Milstein, P. purpuratus subsp. tongaensis Van Jaarsv. & T.J.Edwards and P. purpuratus subsp.
montanus Van Jaarsv. & T.J.Edwards. P. aliciae (Codd) Van Jaarsv. & T.J.Edwards and P. lucidus (Benth.) Van Jaarsv. &
T.J.Edwards are given new status, and P. pentheri (Giirke) Van Jaarsv. & T.J.Edwards is transferred to this genus from Coleus
and recognized as a species.
INTRODUCTION
Plectranthus includes 45 southern African species
which are found in the subtropical forests and savannas
of the summer rainfall region. The genus was revised by
Codd (1975, 1985) who recognized 44 species in southern
Africa. Subsequent collections and additional information
have resulted in the recognition of another species and
three new infraspecific taxa which are described here. Two
varieties are raised to species level and one species, origi-
nally described under Coleus, is transferred to Plectran-
thus. The newly described taxa belong to the subgenus
Plectranthus.
1. Plectranthus malvinus Van Jaarsv. & T.J.Ed-
wards sp. nov. a P. ciliato E.Mey. ex Benth. folds firmis,
coriaceis, succulentis, marginibus serratis pagina foliorum
strigosa floribusque malvinis differt.
TYPE. — Eastern Cape, 3129 (Port St Johns); Mount Sul-
livan, (-DA), E. van Jaarsveld & Bingham 10522 (NBG,
holo.).
Decumbent, strigose, mat-forming herb; roots shallow,
fibrous. Stetns 4-angled, purple-green, ± 3 mm in diame-
ter, strigose (white multicellular hairs), punctate; inter-
nodes 10-40 mm apart. Leaves fleshy, firm, ovate to
obovate, 40-90 x 30-50 mm, strigose, serrate with 8-10
pairs of teeth; abaxial surface strigose, veins purple,
densely strigose, hairs white, gland dots colourless,
sunken; base cuneate, apex acute; petiole 5-10 mm long,
purple, densely villose on adaxial surface, decurrent. In-
florescence a raceme or lax panicle, 180-210 mm long;
cymes 3-flowered, 10-15 mm apart; bracts ovate-lanceo-
late, 7x2 mm long; pedicels ± 10 mm long. Calyx 4
mm long (enlarging to 10 mm), upper lobe ovate, 2 mm
long (5 mm in fruit), lower lobes 4, linear, 1.5 mm long
(4 mm after flowering). Corolla ± 12 mm long, pink (vio-
let group 84c), tube laterally compressed, 6 mm long, sac-
cate at base and 3 mm deep, narrowing to 2 mm at throat.
upper lip 7 mm long, 2-lobed, lateral lobes 3 mm long, lower
lip boat-shaped, 5 mm long. Nutlets brown to black, ovoid,
1.5 X 1.0 mm. Flowering time: March to May. Eigure 1.
This species was collected along forest fringes on
quartzitic sandstones of Mount Sullivan (W end). It has
been cultivated as a ground cover at Kirstenbosch Na-
tional Botanical Garden for a number of years under the
name P. ciliatus ‘Bingham’. Codd (1975) related this
* National Botanical Institute. Kirstenbosch, Private Bag X7, Claremont
7735, Cape Town.
** Botany Department, University of Natal, P.O.Box 375, Pieter- EICURE 1. — P. malvinus, E. van Jaarsveld & Bingham 10522, Port St
maritzburg 3200. Johns, Eastern Cape. Habit, x 0.5. Scale bar: 12 mm. Artist: Vicky
MS. received: 1996-04-20. Thomas.
2
Bothalia27,l (1997)
taxon both to P. strigosus and P. ciliatus. It is distinguished
by its firm, succulent, ovate to obovate leaves which are
serrate, have densely pilose purple veins and are densely
punctate underneath. The latter feature immediately sepa-
rates it from P strigosus or P lucidus which have red
gland dots. The flowers are reminiscent of P ciliatus but
are generally smaller and are an attractive mauve. P cili-
atus has soft leaves and usually bears white flowers.
P malvinus is one of the endemics of the region of
quartzitic sandstone in KwaZulu-Natal and northern East-
ern Cape. It is found on Mount Thesiger, Mount Sullivan
and in adjacent territory on forest margins. Associated spe-
cies in the habitat include Mitriostigma axillare, Drimiop-
sis maculata and P ciliatus.
2. Plectranthus purpuratus Harv., Thesaurus cap-
ensis 1: 53, t. 83 (1859). Type: ex Hort., Kew, from seed
sent from Port Natal [KwaZulu-Natal: Durban], R. Vause
s.n. (K, holo.!).
Procumbent to decumbent, perennial, succulent herb,
up to 200 mm high; roots fibrous. Stems 4-angled, suc-
culent. Leaves broadly trullate, broadly ovate, obovate to
subrotund, 10-15 x 10-15 mm, entire to variably serrate
to crenate with 2 or 3 pairs of teeth, strigose to sub-
glabrous; lower surface occasionally purplish, rubropunc-
tate; tip acute, base truncate to broadly cuneate; petioles
3-15 mm long. Raceme 30-290 mm long, racemose, oc-
casionally with a pair of side branches; cymes 3-flowered,
5-10 mm apart; bracts linear-lanceolate, 3-4 mm long,
persistent beyond flowering stage; pedicels 3-5 mm long.
Calyx 3 mm long; fruiting calyx 5 mm long. Corolla
12-13 mm long, white or pale mauve, tube 5-8 mm long,
basally ventricose, constricted about 3 nun from base and
flared at throat, upper lobes emarginate, 3-5 mm long,
lateral lobes ± 2 mm long, lower lip boat-shaped, 5-7 mm
long. Nutlets brown or black, 1.5 mm long.
Plectranthus purpuratus is widely distributed in the
eastern parts of southern Africa from Durban through
KwaZulu-Natal and Swaziland to Mpumalanga (Eastern
Transvaal), occurring in rocky gorges in savanna and
grassland. The species has a diagnostic, medial constric-
tion of the corolla tube which distinguishes it from P
strigosus, P lucidus and P. oertendahlii.
Key to subspecies of P purpuratus
la Plants erect to decumbent; leaves entire to obscurely crenate,
succulent, subrotund, subglabrous, subimbricate
subsp. purpuratus
lb Plants procumbent; leaves not distinctly succulent, strigose,
lax:
2a Leaves large, trullate (petioles 12-15 mm long), distinctly
serrate, with 3 or 4 pairs of teeth subsp. tongaensis
2b Leaves broadly ovate to obovate (petiole 6-12 mm long),
shallowly serrate with 2 or 3 pairs of teeth . . subsp. rrumtanus
2a. Plectranthus purpuratus Harv. subsp. purpuratus
Stems erect to decumbent, succulent. Leaves subimbri-
cate, subrotund to broadly ovate, succulent, 15^5 x
15-38 mm, grey-green, entire, occasionally shallowly cre-
nate, with 3 pairs of teeth, subglabrous, rubropunctate be-
neath, apex rounded, base truncate to cuneate. Raceme
30-120 mm long, often with a pair of side branches;
cymes 3-flowered, 5-10 mm apart; bracts ovate-lanceo-
late, 2 mm long, persistent; pedicel 2-3 mm long; fruiting
calyx 5 mm long. Corolla 10-11 mm long, white, tube ±
4 mm long, constricted in middle. Nutlets brown, 1 mm
long. Figure 2.
P. purpuratus subsp. purpuratus is confined to the Dur-
ban-Pietermaritzburg region of central KwaZulu-Natal
(Figure 3) and occurs on rocky outcrops or south-facing
cliffs in bushveld. It is commonly found in association
with species such as Aloe arborescens, Gasteria croucheri
and Plectranthus hadiensis var. tomentosus.
Subsp. purpuratus is distinguished from subsp. mon-
tanus and subsp. tongaensis by its decumbent habit and
succulent, glabrescent, subrotund leaves which are
crowded and often subimbricate. Its leaves are entire or,
rarely, obscurely crenate. The typical subspecies was
named for its purple abaxial leaf surfaces. The plants have
an erect to decumbent habit.
2b. Plectranthus purpuratus subsp. tongaensis
Van Jaarsv. & T.J. Edwards subsp. nov. a subspecie typica
FIGURE 2.—P. purpuratus subsp. purpuratus, E. van Jaarsveld 9843,
Mamba Valley, KwaZulu-Natal. Plant, x 0.5. Scale bar: 10 mm.
Artist; Vicky Thomas.
Bothalia27,l (1997)
3
FIGURE 3. — Distribution of P. lucidus, •; P. purpuratus subsp. purpu-
ratus, ■; P. purpuratus subsp, tongaensis, ★; P. purpuratus
subsp. montanus. A; P. pentheri, O.
habitu procumbenti foliisque trullatis non congestis, mar-
ginibus serrratis paribus dentium tribus vel quatuor differt.
TYPE. — KwaZulu-Natal, 2732 (Ubombo): Kosi Bay,
(-BB), Van Jaarsveld 12206 (NBG, holo.).
Procumbent, pubescent to glabrescent, succulent herb,
rooting at nodes. Stems 4-angled, purplish to green, 2-3
mm in diameter, strigose (purplish to white hairs),
rubropunctate; intemodes 20-30(-60) mm long. Leaves
ovate to broadly ovate, 30-34 x 15-18 mm, green or pur-
ple tinged, coarsely serrate, with 3 or 4 pairs of shallow
teeth, abaxial surface strigose to glabrescent, rubropunc-
tate, veins densely strigose, apex acute, base broadly cun-
eate; petiole 12-15 mm long, strigose, rubropunctate.
Raceme 140-290 mm long, occasionally with a pair of
basal side branches; cymes 3-flowered, 8-20 mm apart;
bracts ovate-lanceolate, ± 3 mm long; pedicel ± 4 mm
long. Calyx ± 3 mm long, enlarging to 6 mm, upper lip
ovate, 2 mm long (± 4 mm after flowering), lower lobes
4, linear, ± 1.5 mm long (± 3.5 mm long after flowering),
densely strigose (flushed with blue). Corolla 12-13 mm
long, white, bilabiate, tube basally saccate, 7 mm long,
upper lip 5-6 mm long, 2-lobed, lateral lobes 2-3 mm
long, lower lip boat-shaped, 5-6 mm long. Nutlets black,
ovoid, 1.5 X 1.0 mm. Flowering time: March to May.
Figure 4A.
FIGURE 4. — P. purpuratus-. A, subsp.
tongaensis, E. van Jaarsveld,
Van der Walt & Crous 50,
Kosi Bay, KwaZulu-Natal; B,
subsp. montanus, E. van
Jaarsveld 3386, Barberton,
Mpumalanga. A, B, habit,
X 0.7. Scale bars: 14 mm. Art-
ist: Vicky Thomas.
4
Bothalia27,l (1997)
FIGURE 5, — P. saccatus: A-C, subsp. saccatus; D, subsp. pondoensis,
E. van Jaarsveld 2201, Oribi Gorge, KwaZulu-Natal. Habit, x
0.5. Artist: Vicky Tbomas.
This subspecies is locally common or sporadic in
coastal sand forest from St Lucia to Kosi Bay in northern
KwaZulu-Natal (Figure 3). Plants are often found in as-
sociation with Crassula expansa subsp. fragilis, Plectran-
thus petiolaris and Cussonia arenicola.
2c. Plectranthus purpuratus subsp. montanus Van
Jaarsv. & TJ. Edwards subsp. nov. a subspecie typica foliis
non congestis laminis obovatis marginibus vix serratis
paribus dentium duobus differt.
TYPE. — Swaziland, 2631 (Mbabane); Mbabane, (-AC),
Compton 32207 (NBG, holo.).
Procumbent, pubescent, succulent herb; roots shallow,
fibrous. Stems 4-angled, purplish to green, 2.5 mm in di-
ameter, strigose, rubropunctate; internodes 5-12 mm long.
Leaves ovate to broadly ovate, 12-15 x 10-15 mm, green
to purplish, teeth (2 pairs) shallow, serrate to crenate-den-
tate, abaxial surface sparsely strigose, rubropunctate, veins
densely strigose, base cuneate, apex obtuse to acute; peti-
ole 6-12 mm long, strigose, rubropunctate. Raceme
30-100 mm long, occasionally with a pair of side
branches at base; cymes 3-flowered, 5-12 mm apart;
bracts ovate-lanceolate, ± 2 mm long; pedicels 2-4 mm
long. Calyx 3 mm long, enlarging to 6 mm; upper lobe 2
mm long (4 mm after flowering), ovate and lower lobes
4, linear, ± 1.5 mm long (3.5 mm after flowering), densely
strigose. Corolla 14-15 mm long, white, tube 7 mm long,
upper lip 5-6 mm long, 2-lobed, lower lip boat-shaped,
3-4 mm long. Nutlets black, ovoid, 1.5 x 1.0 mm. Flow-
ering time: March to May. Figure 4B.
The obovate leaves of this subspecies are usually cov-
ered in a grey indumentum. The lamina margin is ob-
scurely serrate with two pairs of teeth. The subspecies
occurs along the Mpumalanga (Eastern Transvaal) Drak-
ensberg (Figure 3), usually among rocks in grassland and
forest margins. Associated species include Aloe suprafo-
liata and R verticillatus.
3. Plectranthus saccatus Benth. subsp. pondoensis
Van Jaarsv. & S.Milstein subsp. nov. a subspecie typica
foliis manifesto succulentis, inflorescentia brevi, tuboque
corollae brevi 6-7 mm longo differt.
TYPE. — KwaZulu-Natal, 3030 (Port Shepstone): Oribi
Gorge, (-CA), E. van Jaarsveld 2201 (PRE, holo.).
Trailing, glutinous succulent herb. Stems obscurely
four-angled; young stems 2-5 mm in diameter, purplish,
minutely glandular pubescent, becoming glabrous; older
stems striate; intemodes 6-40 mm long. Leaves ovate to
broadly trullate, 12-27 x 10-28, both surfaces minutely
glandular pubescent, abaxial surface slightly costate; peti-
ole 5-25 mm long. Racemes secund, 30-50 mm long;
bracts linear, ± 1 mm long, caducous; pedicels 6-7 mm
long. Calyx 3-6 mm long (enlarging to 8 mm), upper lip
ascending, ovate, 1 mm long, lower lobes 4, narrowly
linear-lanceolate, 1 mm long. Corolla saccate, tube 6-20
X 3-7 mm, upper lip 2-lobed, 9-13 x 7-12 mm, erect,
lobes folded back, lower lip horizontal or slightly droop-
ing, blue to pale mauve-pink, inner surface speckled with
purple (often in 4 rows), lower lip 8 mm long, speckled
with purple. Stamens ± 14 mm long, declinate in lower
lip, free for 8 mm; anthers purple, bent upwards. Style
11-12 mm long. Figure 5D.
P. saccatus subsp. pondoensis is distinguished from
the typical subspecies by its distinctly succulent leaves
and decumbent to procumbent habit with flexible stems
up to 4 m long. The secondary growth of the species is
anomalous with many broad collenchymatous rays which
impart flexibility.
The two subspecies are ecologically separated, with
subsp. pondoensis being common in scrub along gorge
lips, and subsp. saccatus being common in forest. Suc-
culence occurs in a number of cliff-dwelling species {P.
ernstii, P purpuratus and P strigosus). The two sub-
species maintain their vegetative characteristics under
uniform cultivation. No hybrids between them have
been observed.
P saccatus subsp. pondoensis is restricted to the quartzitic
sandstone cliff faces of the Msikaba River of northern East-
ern Cape (northern Transkei) and southern KwaZulu-Natal
(Figure 6). Associated species include Cryptocarya wyliei
and Crassula sarmentosa var. sarmentosa.
P saccatus subsp. saccatus is very variable, with sev-
eral local forms (Figure 5A-C). The recognition of var.
longitu- bus Codd within this species is contentious. The
corolla tube length is highly variable and appears to form
a continuum.
Bothalia27,l (1997)
5
FIGURE 6. — Distribution of P. aliciae, •; P. saccatus subsp. pondoen-
sis, □.
4. Plectranthus aliciae (Codd) Van Jaarsv. &
TJ. Edwards stat. nov. Type: Transkei, Butterworth, Ken-
tani, Pegler 909 (PRE, holo.!).
P madagascariensis var. aliciae Codd in Bothalia 11: 404 (1975).
Erect to decumbent, soft, semi-succulent herb to 400
mm high. Leaves 25^0 x 22^0 mm, broadly ovate,
sparsely strigose, adaxial surface rubropunctate, serrate,
teeth in 3 or 4 pairs, base truncate, apex acute. Raceme
up to 130 mm long; cymes 3-6- flowered. Calyx 3 mm
long (enlarging to 5 mm). Corolla white, 5-14 mm long,
tube widening to throat. Nutlets 1 mm long, light to dark
brown. Figure 7.
R aliciae is distinguished by its ascending habit, mem-
branous, sparsely pubescent lamina wih 2 or 3 pairs of
teeth and short corolla tube. It is distributed from East
London to southern KwaZulu-Natal (Figure 6) occurring
in subtropical lowland forest. Associated species at Oribi
Gorge include Cryptocarya woodii, P. oertendahlii, P.
oribiensis, P zuluensis and P petiolaris.
P aliciae is sympatric with P. madagascariensis and is
therefore accorded specific status. P madagascariensis is a
species of open subtropical thickets and forms dense stands,
whereas P aliciae is a forest dweller and retains its habit in
cultivation. P aliciae commemorates Alice Pegler
(1861-1929), teacher and amateur botanist in the E Cape.
5. Plectranthus lucidus Van Jaarsv. & TJ. Edwards
stat. nov. Type: Eastern Cape, Bathurst, Burchell 3924,
(K!, holo.).
P. slrigosus Benth. var. lucidus Benth. 12; 68 (1848).
Procumbent, succulent herb, rooting at nodes, glabrous
or sparsely pubescent; roots fibrous. Stems 4-angled, pur-
plish to green, 2.5 mm in diameter, strigose (white mul-
ticellular hairs), rubropunctate; internodes 5-20 mm long.
Leaves ovate to broadly ovate, 12-15 x 10-15 mm, serrate
to crenate-dentate, with 3 or 4 pairs of teeth, green to
purplish, abaxial surface sparsely strigose, veins densely
strigose, rubropunctate, base cuneate, apex obtuse to
acute; petioles 5-15 mm long, strigose and rubropunctate.
Raceme simple, 30-100 mm long, rarely with a pair of
side branches; cymes 1 -flowered, verticillasters 5-10 mm
apart; bracts ovate-lanceolate, 2-3 mm long; pedicel 4-5
mm long. Calyx at flowering 3-4 mm long, enlarging to
7 mm, consisting of a large, ovate upper lip 2 mm long
(4 mm after flowering) and 4 subulate lower lobes, 3.5
mm long (5 mm long after flowering), densely strigose,
with longer purplish hairs. Corolla 9-11 mm long, white
or mauve; tube straight, 5 mm long, basally saccate, con-
stricted distally; upper lip 5 mm long, 2-lobed, upper lobes
3 mm long, lateral lobes 2 mm long, with long multicel-
lular white hairs, lower lip boat-shaped, margins strongly
involute. Nutlets brown to black, ovoid, 1.5 x 1.0 mm.
Flowering time: March to May. Figure 8.
Plectranthus lucidus forms mats on stabilized coastal
sand dunes below trees (with mainly Mimusops obovata
and Allophyllus natalensis), from Bathurst in the south-
eastern part to Port St Johns in the northeastern part of
Eastern Cape. It shares its habitat with other shade-loving
coastal plant species such as P. madagascariensis and
Scadoxus membranaceus.
P. lucidus is closely related to P. verticillatus (L.f.)
Druce and P. strigosus Benth. (section Plectranthus series
Plectranthus)-, it is distinguished by its 2-flowered ver-
ticillasters and short corolla (9-11 mm) of which the lower
lip margins are conspicuously inrolled. In both P. strigosus
and P. lucidus the corolla is constricted at the throat, unlike
P. verticillatus where the corolla is linear.
6. Plectranthus pentheri (Giirke) Van Jaarsv. &
T.J. Edwards comb. nov. Type: Eastern Cape, Albany Dis-
FIGURE 7. — P. aliciae, Umtamvuna, KwaZulu-Natal. E. van Jaarsveld
& Campher 117. Plant, x 0.5; habit much reduced. Scale bar: 20
mm. Artist: Vicky Thomas.
6
FIGURE 8. — P. lucidus, E. van Jaarsveld 3827, Port St Johns, Eastern
Cape. Plant, x 0.6; flowers and calyx, x 1.3. Artist: Vicky
Thomas.
trict, Breakfast Vlei, Kwok in Herb. Penther 1716 (W,
holo.; PRE!).
Coleus pentheri Giirke in Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in
Wien 20: 48 (1905).
Decumbent, succulent herb up to 100 mm tall; basal
tuber 30 X 15 mm, white. Stems 4-angled, 2-4- mm in
diameter, sparsely pilose, punctate, glands orange; inter-
nodes 3-6 mm long. Leaves conduplicate, succulent, firm,
ovate to subrotund, 9-14 x 9-14 mm, entire to dentate-
serrate in upper half, teeth shallow, in 4 or 5 pairs; sparsely
pubescent, punctate, glands orange, base broadly cuneate,
apex obtuse; petiole 2 mm long. Raceme 50-70 mm long,
simple; cymes 3-llowered, 5-10 mm apart; bracts broadly
ovate to subrotund, mucronate, 4x4 mm, initially imbri-
cate, caducous; pedicels 5 mm long. Calyx 3 mm long
(enlarging to 5 mm), upper lip broadly ovate, 2.0 x 2.5
mm, lower lobes 4, linear, 2 mm long. Corolla 15 mm
long, white; tube laterally compres.sed, slightly geniculate,
5.0 X 1.5 mm, expanding to 3 mm at throat, upper lip 3
mm long, 2-lobed, lateral lobes 2.5 mm long, lower lip
Bothalia27,l (1997)
FIGURE 9. — P. pentheri, E. van Jaarsveld, Sardien & Peterson 13774,
Kei River, Eastern Cape. Plant and rootstock, x 0.5. Scale bar: 20
rrun. Artist: Vicky Thomas.
boat-shaped, 9 mm long. Nutlets brown to black, ovoid,
1.5 X 1.0 mm. Flowering time: March to May. Figure 9.
Codd (1985) regarded P. pentheri (as Coleus pentheri) as
a synonym of P neochilus. The two entities, however, differ
markedly. Both belong to subgenus Calceolanthus but P.
pentheri is at once distinguished by its oblong tuberous roots
and white flowers. It also lacks the strong aroma of the
closely related P neochilus, which is a widespread species
with fibrous roots and mauve to purple flowers.
P. pentheri is known from a few gatherings. It grows
with Crassula ericoides on lithosols of granite boulders
in grassland.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Dr O. A. Leistner is thanked for preparing the Latin
diagnoses and editing the text.
REFERENCES
BENTHAM, G. 1848. Labiatae. In A.P. de Candolle, Prodromus 12: 55.
CODD L.E., 1975. Plectranthus (Labiatae) and allied genera in southern
Africa. Bothalia 11: 371-442.
CODD, L.E., 1985. Lamiaceae. In O.A. Leistner, Elora of southern Africa
28,4: 137-172.
GURKE, R E A M. 1905. Coleus pentheri. Annalen des Naturhistoris-
chen Museums in Wien 20: 48.
HARVEY, W.H. 1895. Thesaurus capensis 1 : 53, t. 83.
Bothalia27,l; 7-15 (1997)
Five new species of Lachenalia (Hyacinthaceae) from arid areas of South
Africa
G.D. DUNCAN*
Keywords: Hyacinthaceae, Lachenalia, new species. South Africa
ABSTRACT
Five new species of Lachenalia are described: L. aurioliae G.D. Duncan from the Little Karoo and Great Karoo, L. obscura
Schltr. ex G.D. Duncan from Namaqualand, the Kamiesberg, the western Great Karoo and the Little Karoo, L. inconspicua
G.D. Duncan from the Kamiesberg, western Bushmanland and southern Namaqualand, L. marlothii W.F.Barker ex G.D. Duncan
from the Calvinia-Sutherland region of the western Great Karoo, and L. xerophila Schltr. ex G.D. Duncan from northwestern
and central Namaqualand, and western Bushmanland.
INTRODUCTION
This is the second in a series of papers on new species
of Lachenalia, and serves as a continuation of the recent
work of W.F.Barker (Barker 1978, 1979, 1983a &b, 1984,
1987, 1989) and the current author (Duncan 1987, 1988a
& b, 1989, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1996), towards a revision
of the genus. Material of a number of unpublished
Lachenalia species has languished in local and foreign
herbaria for many years, and in some instances manuscript
names accompany this material; the abovementioned pa-
pers serve as a means of validating these names, where
it is considered expedient. Furthermore, new species are
published which have come to light in recent years. In
most instances, the new species are described from both
dried and living material, the dried material extracted
mainly from the extensive Lachenalia holdings at the
Compton Herbarium at Kirstenbosch (NBG), and the liv-
ing material both from the wild and the large collection
maintained in the nursery at Kirstenbosch National Bo-
tanical Garden.
Lachenalia aurioliae G.D. Duncan, sp. nov. L.
schelpei W.F Barker affmis ob flores similares subspicatos
oblongo-urceolatos, stamina parum exserta foliaque
lanceolata; sed segmentis interioribus perianthii multo
longioribus, staminibus declinatis folioque conduplicato
immaculate plerumque costa distincta differt.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3222 (Beaufort West): hillside
facing Hesperus Old Age Home, Beaufort West, (-BC),
26-6-1984, A. Batten 468 (NBG, holo.!; PRE).
Deciduous, winter-growing geophyte 45-120 mm
high. Bulb subglobose, 20-25 mm in diam., surrounded
by thin, pale to dark brown spongy outer tunics, produced
into a short neck. Leaves 1 or 2, partially to fully condu-
plicate, lanceolate to ovate-lanceolate with a distinct mid-
rib and faint depressed longitudinal veins on upper
surface, yellowish green, plain or faintly spotted with dull
*National Botanical Institute, Kirstenbosch, Private Bag X7, Claremont
7735, Cape Town.
MS. received: 1996-11-08.
green or purple on upper surface, with darker green
blotches and transverse bands on lower surface, merging
into brownish magenta transverse bands on the loosely
clasping leaf bases. Inflorescence subspicate, moderately
dense, few to many-flowered, 35-90 mm long, with a
short sterile tip; peduncle suberect to erect, fairly sturdy,
45-140 mm long, pale green with distinct, irregularly
scattered brownish magenta blotches in lower half, and
minute spots in upper half; rachis pale green in lower half,
shading to pale greenish brown in upper half, mottled with
tiny brownish magenta specks; pedicels absent or up to
1mm long; bracts ovate to lanceolate, greenish white, with
or without pale brownish magenta tips, 1^ x 1-3 mm.
Flowers patent to cernuous, oblong-urceolate, pale bluish
white to yellowish white, fading to dull reddish brown;
outer perianth segments swollen at base, oblong,
6- 7 X 4-5 mm, minutely spotted with dark blue on keel
and near apex, pale bluish white to yellowish white with
distinct dull reddish brown to purplish brown gibbosities;
inner perianth segments obovate, 9-10 x 5 mm, translu-
cent white with a dark blue or brownish blue keel, with
or without a dull reddish purple zone near apex. Stamens
very slightly exserted, declinate; filaments white, 8-9 mm
long. Ovary ovoid, pale green, 3x2 mm; style white,
7- 8 mm long, protruding beyond stamens as ovary en-
larges. Capsule ovoid, membranous, 6-8 x 5 mm. Seed
ovoid, shiny black, 2 mm long, with a ridged terminal
arillode 1 mm long. Figures lA; 2 & 3.
Etymology: named after Mrs Auriol Batten, whose col-
lection forms the type material of this species, in recog-
nition of her contribution to the knowledge of South
Africa’s flora through her superb watercolour paintings
which have illustrated several books authored or co-
authored by her.
Diagnostic characters
L. aurioliae is characterised by a subspicate inflorescence
of cernuous or patent, oblong-urceolate flowers with the
translucent white inner perianth segments distinctly longer
than the outer ones. The declinate stamens are very slightly
exserted beyond the tip of the perianth and the plant usually
has two lanceolate or ovate-lanceolate leaves which are par-
tially to fully conduplicate, usually with a distinct midrib.
8
Bothalia27,l (1997)
FIGURE 1 . — A, Lachenalia aurioliae. Batten 468\ B, L. obscura, Duncan 108; C, L. inconspicua. Duncan 259. Scale bars: 10 mm.
The upper leaf surface may be plain or spotted with dull
green or purple, and the lower surface with or without darker
green blotches and transverse bands.
L aurioliae is related to L schelpei W.F.Barker, (at pre-
sent known only from the Hantam Mountains at Calvinia in
the Northern Cape), in that both species have patent or cer-
nuous oblong-urceolate flowers borne on very short pedicels,
with very slightly exserted stamens and similar lanceolate
leaves. In L. schelpei, the flowers are subtended by conspicu-
ous, long, narrowly lanceolate bracts, and the inner perianth
segments are only slightly longer than the outer segments,
as compared to the very short, ovate to lanceolate bracts and
distinctly longer inner perianth segments of L. aurioliae. Fur-
thermore, the stamens of L. schelpei are arranged symmet-
rically around the rim of the mouth of the perianth, whereas
in L. aurioliae the stamens are distinctly declinate. The
flower colour of L. aurioliae varies from pale bluish white
to yellowish white whereas L schelpei has greenish white
flowers. The two species are geographically clearly sepa-
rated. Flowering time: June to August.
Distribution and habitat
Material of L. aurioliae was collected for the first time
by C. Thorne in October 1935 at Leeuwkloof in the Nu-
weveld Mountains north of Beaufort West. It is a variable,
early flowering species with a fairly wide distribution in
the southern Great Karoo and the Little Karoo, where it
is found in a variety of arid habitats ranging from sandy
river courses in full sun to south-facing hill slopes in
heavy soil. At a locality near Whitehill Station in the Little
Karoo it grows together with the very distinctive L. white-
hillensis W.F.Barker, another Karoo endemic species
which flowers much later in the year.
Material examined
NORTHERN CAPE. — 3221 (Merweville): between Boschluiskloof
and Prince Albert, (-AB), July 19.‘54, Stokoe s.n. (SAM); west of Steen-
bokkraal, (-BA), June 1986, Bayer 5189 (NBG).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3222 (Beaufort West): Leeuwkloof, Nieuweveld,
(-BA), Oct. 1935, Thome s.n. (SAM); 16 km S of Beaufort West, (-BC),
July 1986, Van Zijl s.n. (NBG); hillside facing Hesperus Old Age Home,
Beaufort West, (-BC), June 1984, Batten 468 (NBG). 3320 (Montagu):
in river course at Whitehill Station, (-BA), Aug. 1986, Duncan 243
(NBG); Ratelfontein, between Montagu and Kareevlakte, (-CB), July
FIGURE 2. — Holotype of Lachenalia aurioliae, Batten 468.
Bothalia27,l (1997)
9
1954, Lewis 4397 (SAM); Wildehondekloof Pass, 36 km E of Montagu,
(-CC), Aug. 1974, Nordenstam & Lundgren 1191 (NBG). 3321 (Ladi-
smith): Mannshoop Farm, 0.8 km from homestead, (-CA), July 1982,
Laidler 186 (NBG); N of Rooiberg, Ladismith, (-CB), Aug. 1954, Wurts
1227 (NBG). 3322 (Oudtshoom); hills near Kammanassie, (-DB), July
1954, Lewis 4396 (SAM).
Lachenalia obscura Schllr. ex G.D. Duncan, sp.
nov. L maximiliani Schltr. ex W.F. Barker affmis ob seg-
mentos interiores perianthii similares ad apicem magen-
teos, folium lanceolatum, bulbum globosum squamis
exterioribus duris brunneis circumcinctum, seminaque
globosa; sed planta omnino grandiora floribus oblongo-
campanulatis pallide flavo-virentibus ad brunneolo-
caeruleis vel cremeis, staminibus parum exsertis foliisque
plerumque pagina inferiora fasciis distinctis viridibus,
brunneolo-purpureis et magenteis differt.
TYPE. — Northern Cape, 3119 (Calvinia): Vogelstruis
Vlakte, Calvinia Division, (-DC), 26-7-1941, R.H. Comp-
ton 11174 (NBG, holo.!).
Deciduous, winter-growing geophyte 55-380 mm
high. Bulb globose, 10-25 mm in diam., white, sur-
rounded by hard, cartilaginous pale to dark brown outer
scales, produced into a short, strawlike neck. Leaves usu-
ally 2, erect to suberect, yellowish green to dark green,
often conduplicate, 25-280 x 5-45 mm, upper leaf sur-
face with faint, depressed longitudinal veins, usually un-
marked, lower leaf surface usually heavily banded with
bright green merging into dull brownish purple and ma-
genta on clasping leaf base. Inflorescence spicate to sub-
spicate, 15-220 mm long, few to many-flowered, with a
short sterile tip; flowers often arranged in distinct whorls
of three at base of inflorescence, becoming less distinctly
whorled towards top of inflorescence; peduncle erect to
suberect, slender or sturdy, 25-100 mm long, pale to dark
green with pale to dark purplish blotches; rachis mottled
with very pale bluish purple; pedicels white, often absent
in lower half of inflorescence, but up to 2 mm long in
upper part; bracts ovate to lanceolate, greenish white,
2-4 X 1-3 mm. Flowers patent to slightly cemuous, ob-
long-campanulate, pale yellowish green to brownish blue
or cream, with or without distinct magenta tips, fading to
dull purple; outer perianth segments oblong, 6-9 x 4 mm,
pale yellowish green to brownish blue or cream with pale
blue speckles or solid blue at base, with dull brown,
brownish purple or green gibbosities and slightly recurved
tips; inner perianth segments protruding well beyond outer
segments, obovate, translucent white with distinct bright
FIGURE 4. — Holotype of Lachenalia obscura. Compton 11174.
10
Bothalia27,l (1997)
FIGURE 5. — Painting of Lachenalia
obscura, drawn from Compton
1 1174, reproduced from the
original watercolour by Miss
WE. Barker. Plant, x 0.7.
green keels, recurved, with or without pale to dark ma-
genta tips, 8-10 X 5-7 mm. Stamens declinate, as long as
or shortly exserted up to 2 mm beyond inner perianth seg-
ments; filaments white, 8-11 mm long. Ovary ovoid, pale
green, 3-4 x 2 mm; style white, 8 mm long, protruding
beyond stamens as ovary enlarges. Capsule ovoid,
7-8 X 4-6 mm. Seed globose, 1 mm long, shiny black,
with a short, ridged terminal arillode 0.3 mm long. Fig-
ures IB; 3-5.
Etymology: named obscura by Schlechter to convey
the obscure and very variable appearance of this species.
Diagnostic characters
L. obscura is characterized by a spicate or subspicate
inflorescence of patent to slightly cernuous, oblong-cam-
panulate, pale yellowish green to brownish blue or cream
flowers, with or without distinct magenta tips. The trans-
lucent white, inner perianth segments are distinctly longer
than the outer segments and have slightly recurved tips.
The flowers are usually arranged in distinct, three-flow-
ered whorls in the lower part of the inflorescence, becom-
ing less distinctly whorled towards the top. The declinate
stamens are included within, or very slightly exserted be-
yond the perianth. The one or two erect to suberect,
lanceolate leaves usually have distinct green to brownish
purple and magenta bands on the lower surface, and the
globose bulb is surrounded by hard, dark brown, cartilagi-
nous outer scales.
L. obscura appears to be most closely related to L.
maximiliani Schltr. ex W.F.Barker, a dwarf species occur-
ring in large colonies and restricted to the Wuppertal-Ced-
erberg area of the Western Cape. Both species have spicate
or subspicate inflorescences with magenta-tipped inner pe-
rianth segments and a globose bulb surrounded by hard,
dark brown outer scales and similar globose seeds with a
terminal, ridged arillode. L. maximiliani differs from L.
obscura mainly in having narrow-urceolate, very pale blu-
Bothalia27,l (1997)
II
ish grey flowers and a single unbanded, canaliculate leaf.
Flowering time: June to October.
Distribution and habitat
Rudolf Schlechter collected this species for the first
time at Papkuilsfontein, southeast of Vanrhynsdorp, in Au-
gust 1897. He distributed material to nine local and for-
eign herbaria under his manuscript name L. obscura,
where it has remained unpublished for one hundred years.
L. obscura is a widely distributed and very variable spe-
cies; it is currently recorded from Steinkopf at the north-
ernmost end of its range, southwards throughout Nama-
qualand to the Kamiesberg and Knersvlakte, eastwards to
the Nieuwoudtville-Calvinia area where it is common, and
further south to Sutherland, and south and southeastwards
to the Montagu and Oudtshoorn areas.
Due to its wide distribution, L. obscura is encountered
in a wide variety of habitats, but is usually found on kar-
roid flats in dry stony clay soil, and less frequently in
sandy soil on moist lower mountain slopes. Plants usually
grow singly or in small clumps in full sun among low-
growing bushes. The typical forms of this species, such
as those occurring in the Nieuwoudtville-Calvinia area,
have pale yellowish green, oblong-campanulate flowers
with distinct magenta tips and leaves with bright green to
brownish purple and magenta bands on the lower leaf sur-
face, whereas certain forms found further north in
Namaqualand have longer, less campanulate flowers
which are pale blue, with or without very pale magenta
tips, and leaves without distinct bands on the lower sur-
face.
Material examined
NORTHERN CAPE. — 2917 (Springbok): Steinkopf Reserve, (-BA),
Aug. 1980, Van Berkel 164 (NBG); Farm Ratelpoort, (-BD), Aug. 1971,
Hall 4087 (NBG); Farm Eksteenfontein, (-DB), Aug. 1986, Duncan 252
(NBG). 3017 (Hondeklipbaai): Kamieskroon, (-BB), Aug. 1980, Van
Berkel 166 (NBG). 3018 (Kamiesberg): Kamiesberg, (-AC), Aug. 1984,
Van Zijl s.n., (NBG); Studer's Pass, E of Garies, (-AC), June 1970,
Stayner s.n. (NBG). 3019 (Loeriesfontein); N of Loeriesfontein, (-CD),
July 1972, Hiemstra s.n. .sub NBG 97199 (NBG). 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp);
Farm Papkuilsfontein, 41 km SE of Vanrhynsdorp, (-DD), Aug. 1897,
Schlechter 10907 (B, BM, G, GRA, K, L, PRE, S, Z). 3119 (Calvinia):
Grasberg, N of Nieuwoudtville, (-AC), Aug. 1961, Barker 9351 (NBG);
between Grasberg & Nieuwoudtville, (-AC), Aug. 1961, Barker 9362
(NBG); Klipkoppies, Nieuwoudtville, (-AC), Aug. 1961, Barker 9379
(NBG); Sept. 1971, Hardich s.n. (NBG); Nieuwoudtville Reserve, (-AC),
July 1983, Perry & Snijnum 2173 (NBG); E of Nieuwoudtville, (-AC),
July 1970, Nordenstam 770 (NBG); Farm Uitkomst, NW of Nieu-
woudtville, (-AC), Sept. 1970, Barker 10750 (NBG); Farm Soefwater,
between Nieuwoudtville & Calvinia, (-AD), Aug. 1974, Botha s.n.
(NBG); Akkerendam Nature Reserve, Calvinia, (-BD), July 1961, Barker
9321 (NBG); Calvinia commonage, (-BD), Aug. 1968, Stayner s.n. sub.
NBG 93582 (NBG); 30 km before Calvinia, on road from Karoopoort,
(-BD), Sept. 1983, Duncan 108 (NBG); E of Calvinia, on road to Wil-
liston, (-BD), July 1973, Thomas s.n. sub. NBG 98484 (NBG); Farm
Vanrhynshoek, Calvinia, (-BD), Thompson 2366 (NBG); Lokenburg,
(-CB), Aug. 1959, Acocks 20602 (NBG); W of Tafelberg, SE of Calvinia,
(-DB), May 1975, Thompson 2445 (NBG); Vogelstmis Vlakte, (-DC),
July 1941, Compton 11174 (NBG). 3120 (Williston); 34 km on road from
Middelpos to Calvinia, (-CA), Oct. 1974, Thomas s.n. sub. NBG 105715
(NBG); Farm Blomfontein, E of Middelpos, (-CC), Aug. 1972, Barker
10784 (NBG). 3220 (Sutherland): Farm Voelfontein, Sutherland, (-AD),
Sept. 1968, Hall 3252 (NBG); S of Sutherland, (-BC), Oct. 1968, Hall
3287 (NBG); near Sutherland, (-BC), Sept. 1969, Stayner .s.n. .sub NBG
93909 (NBG).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester); E of Worcester on Robertson
road, (-DA), July 1954, Barker 8255 (NBG). 3320 (Montagu): Farm
Mooi-Erfenis, NW of Montagu, (-CA), Oct. 1979, Kriel s.n. sub NBG
120475 (NBG); Flats E of Warmwaterberg, (-DC), Aug. 1971, Boucher
1576 (NBG). 3322 (Oudtshoorn): S slopes of Mannetjiesberg, (-DB),
Oct. 1971, Oliver 3605 (NBG).
Lachenalia inconspicua G.D. Duncan, sp. nov. L.
concordianae Schltr. ex W.F. Barker affinis ob habitum
nanum similarem, inflorescentiam spicatum floribus
plerumque verticillis 3-floris, foliumque singularem
lanceolatum pagina inferiora fasciis brunneolo-viridibus;
sed floribus oblongo-campanulatis, lacteis vel viridi-albis,
folioque coriaceo late patenti pagina superiora maculis
purpureo-brunneis differt.
TYPE. — Northern Cape, 2918 (Gamoep); 500 m be-
yond Gamoep, on road Springbok to Gamoep, in deep
red gravelly sand at side of road, (-CD), 19-8-1986,
G.D. Duncan 259 (NBG, holo.).
Deciduous, winter-growing geophyte 120-160 mm
high. Bulb globose, 15-20 mm in diam., white with thick,
spongy, dark brown outer tunics produced into a short
neck. Leaf usually solitary, lanceolate or occasionally
ovate, widely spreading, deeply channelled, leathery,
85-150 X 15-20 mm, glaucous with depressed longitudi-
nal veins and irregularly scattered purplish brown spots
on upper surface, and broad, brownish green bands on
lower surface, shading to narrower brownish magenta
bands on clasping leaf base. Inflorescence spicate or sub-
spicate, fairly dense, few to many-flowered, 45-80 mm
long, with a very short sterile tip, flowers usually arranged
in distinct three-flowered verticils; peduncle erect, sturdy,
pale green with large purplish brown blotches, 55-80 mm
long; pedicels absent, bracts very much reduced, ovate,
1 mm long. Flowers erecto-patent, oblong-campanulate,
pale bluish or greenish white, fading to dull brownish pur-
ple; outer perianth segments oblong, slightly recurved,
pale greenish blue with darker blue markings at base, and
dull purplish brown or brownish green gibbosities, 7-8
X 4-5 mm; inner perianth segments obovate, translucent
white, with brownish green keels, protruding well beyond
outer segments, slightly recurved, upper two segments
overlapping, lower segment slightly longer, 8-11 x
4-5 mm. Stamens declinate; filaments white, 7-9 mm
long, included within, or slightly exserted up to 1 mm
beyond perianth. Ovary ovoid, pale green, 3 mm long;
style white, 8-9 mm long. Capsule ovoid, membranous,
9-10 X 5 mm. Seed globose, 1 mm long, dull black, with
a ridged terminal arillode 1 mm long. Figures 1C; 6 & 7.
Etymology, named for the inconspicuous, well-camou-
flaged flowers.
Diagnostic characters
L inconspicua is a dwarf species characterized by a
spicate or subspicate inflorescence of pale bluish white or
greenish white oblong-campanulate flowers with purplish
brown or brownish green gibbosities, usually arranged in
distinct three-flowered verticils, and a usually solitary,
lanceolate, widely spreading, deeply channelled leaf with
conspicuous transverse bands on the tightly clasping leaf
base. It is related to L. concordiana Schltr. ex W.F.Barker,
another dwarf species with greenish cream flowers also
arranged in three-flowered verticils; but the latter differs
12
Bothalia27,l (1997)
FIGURE 6. — Holotype of Lachenalia inconspicua, Duncan 259.
in having a linear-lanceolate leaf and widely campanulate
flowers with dark green gibbosities and the tips of the
inner and outer perianth segments all distinctly recurved.
Flowering time: July to August.
Distribution and habitat
L. inconspicua is at present known only from a few
collections made in the Kamiesberg, western Bushman-
land and southern Namaqualand in the Northern Cape.
According to current records, the first collection was made
by F. Archer as recently as August 1982 NE of Gamoep,
and it has since been found at several locations near
Gamoep, and further south near Leliefontein, Kliprand
and Bitterfontein. It is locally plentiful and occurs on open
flats in deep red gravelly sand. An interesting growth fea-
ture of this species in cultivation is the manner in which
healthy bulbs periodically remain completely dormant
during the growing season, a characteristic shared by sev-
eral Lachenalia species from the very arid parts of South
Africa.
Material examined
NORTHERN CAPE. — 2918 (Gamoep): 0.5 km beyond Gamoep, on
road from Springbok to Gamoep, (-CD), Aug. 1986, Duncan 259 (NBG);
Kouberg, NE of Gamoep, (-CD), Aug. 1982, Archer 192 (NBG); Vaal-
koei Farm, SE of Gamoep, (-CD), Aug, 1996, Duncan 381 (NBG). 3018
(Kamiesberg); 2 km S of Paulshoek village, (-AD), Sept, 1996, Petersen
41 (NBG); 5 km on R358 to Kliprand, (-CD), Aug. 1996, Duncan 378
(NBG); 6 km SW of Kliprand, (-DA), Aug. 1995, Symmonds 2 (NBG).
Lachenalia marlothii W.F.Barker ex G.D.Duncan,
sp. nov. L. marginatae W.F. Barker affinis ob folium sin-
gularem simularem ovatum ad ovato-lanceolatum, co-
riaceum, basi amplectenti fasciis distinctis purpureo-
brunneis, flores urceolato-oblongos, segmentosque inte-
riores perianthii longos protrudentes; sed folio sine mar-
gine distincto coriaceo, basi arete circumcincto, segmentis
perianthii distincte recurvatis floribusque valde odoratis
differt.
TYPE. — Northern Cape, 3119 (Calvinia); between
Vlakkraal and Kalkgat Suid, S of Calvinia, (-DC), 23-7-
1961, W.F.Barker 9330 (NBG, holo.!).
Deciduous, winter-growing geophyte 90-160 mm high.
Bulb subglobose, 15-33 mm in diam., white with brown
spongy outer tunics. Leaf solitary, 30-60 x 10-25 mm,
suberect, ovate to ovate-lanceolate, with an undulate,
sometimes crisped margin, blade very leathery, dark green
and unmarked on upper surface, with dark purplish brown
and green transverse bands on lower surface; tightly clasp-
ing leaf base 30-70 mm long, white with very conspicu-
ous purplish brown bands in the upper half, shading to
magenta in the lower half. Inflorescence spicate or sub-
spicate, fairly dense, few- to many-flowered, 40-95 mm
HEIGHT ABOVE SEA LEVEL
Over 1500 m
|~3 900 - 1500 m
r~1 300 - 900 m
I I Under 300 m
FIGURE 7. — Distribution of Lachenalia inconspicua, □; L. marlothii,
•; and L xerophila, A.
Bothalia 27,1 (1997)
13
FIGURE 8. — A, Lachenalia mar-
lothii, Botha s.n.; B, L xero-
phila, Botha s.n. Scale bars:
10 mm.
long, with a very short sterile tip; peduncle slender, erect,
40-100 mm long, pale green with brownish purple
blotches; pedicels absent or up to 2 mm long; bracts
white, ovate, 1-2 mm long. Flowers strongly scented, pa-
tent or suberect, urceolate-oblong; outer perianth segments
ovate, pale blue and green with darker blue bases, 8-9 x 5
mm, with greenish purple or purplish brown gibbosities
and recurved tips; inner perianth segments obovate,
8-11 X 3-6 mm, white or brownish yellow with purplish
green keels, protruding well beyond outer segments, re-
curved, upper two segments overlapping, lower segment
longer and narrower. Stamens declinate; filaments white,
8-10 mm long, included within perianth. Ovary ovoid,
pale green, 4-5 x 3-i mm; style white, 6-7 mm long.
Capsule ovoid, 5-6 x 4 mm. Seed ovoid, 1.5 mm long,
shiny black with a ridged terminal arillode 0.5 mm long.
Figures 7, 8A & 9.
Etymology: L marlothii is named after the famous Ger-
man chemist and botanist Rudolf Marloth, who made the
first recorded collection of this species in October 1920.
Diagnostic characters
L. marlothii is characterized by a spicate or subspicate
inflorescence of patent or suberect, pale blue and yel-
lowish green urceolate-oblong flowers with recurved tips
and included stamens, and a very distinctive, single, ovate
to ovate-lanceolate, coriaceous, suberect leaf with a heav-
ily banded, tightly clasping leaf base. The peduncle is
heavily marked with brownish purple blotches and the
flowers have a strong sweet scent.
L. marlothii appears to be most closely related to L.
marginata W.F. Barker which also has an ovate or ovate-
lanceolate, leathery leaf with distinct purplish brown
bands on the clasping base, urceolate-oblong flowers with
brownish gibbosities on the outer perianth segments and
long protruding inner perianth segments. L. marginata dif-
fers in having a distinctly coriaceous leaf margin, the
clasping leaf base is not tight, the inner and outer perianth
segments are not recurved, and the flowers are not heavily
scented. Flowering time: July to September.
FIGURE 9. — Holotype of Lachenalia marlothii. Barker 9330.
14
Bothalia27,l (1997)
FIGURE 10, — Holotype of Lachenalia xerophila, Botha s.n.
Distribution and habitat
L. marlothii was collected for the first time by Rudolf
Marloth in October 1920 at Waterkloof in the Sutherland
Roggeveld, which forms the southern boundary of its dis-
tribution. It has since been collected mainly in the Calv-
inia District, and is currently known from as far north as
Brandkop, north of Nieuwoudtville. Plants occur singly
or in groups and are usually associated with south-facing
hillslopes in clay soil.
Material examined
NORTHERN CAPE. — 3119 (Calvinia): Brandkop, N of Nieuwoudt-
ville, (-AA), Aug. 1950, Barker 6486 (NBG); Calvinia road towards
Soetwater turn-off, (-AD), July 1971, Botha s.n., (NBG); Van Rhynshoek
Farm, Calvinia, (-BD), Oct. 1986, Thomas 275, (NBG); between
Vlakkraal and Kalkgat Suid, S of Calvinia, (-DC), July 1961, Barker
9330 (NBG). 3220 (Sutherland): Gannaga Pass, SW of Middelpos on
Calvinia-Ceres road, (-AA), Sept. 1971, Hardich s.n. sub. NBG 93862
(NBG); Waterkloof, Sutherland Roggeveld, (-BB), Oct. 1920, Marloth
9661 (PRE).
Lachenalia xerophila Schltr. ex G.D. Duncan, sp.
nov. L. klinghardtianae Dinter et L physocaulotis W.F.
Barker affinis ob stamina similares bene exserta declinata,
pedunculum rachidemque conspicue tumidum, inflores-
centiamque subspicatam vel racemosam floribus oblongo-
campanulatis; sed inflorescentia multo densiora floribus
minoribus cemuis gibbis distinctissimis magnis brunneis,
folioque lanceolato-acuto canaliculato differt.
TYPE. — Northern Cape, 2918 (Gamoep): Kouberg
Farm, off R355 Springbok to Gamoep, western Bushman-
land, (-CD), 29-8-1972, M.C.Botha s.n. sub. NBG 95451
(NBG, holo.!).
Deciduous, winter-growing geophyte 100-250 mm
high. Bulb usually deep-seated, globose, 15-25 mm in
diam., white with membranous dark brown outer tunics.
Leaves one or two, 25-180 x 10-20 mm, lanceolate,
acute, canaliculate, glaucous, with an undulate and crisped
margin, clasping leaf base white, up to 200 mm long. In-
florescence subspicate or racemose, dense, many-flow-
ered, 55-130 mm long with a short sterile tip; peduncle
erect to suberect, very sturdy, 30-110 mm long, conspicu-
ously inflated below and at base of inflorescence, gradu-
ally becoming less inflated towards top of rachis, pale
green; pedicels 2-5 mm long; bracts small and membra-
nous, ovate, 1-2 mm long. Flowers cemuous to spread-
ing, oblong-campanulate; outer perianth segments ovate-
oblong, 6-7 X 3 mm, very pale blue at base, shading
to white above, with very large dull red to dark brown
gibbosities; inner perianth segments obovate, 8-9 x
3-4 mm, protruding beyond outer segments, white with
a greenish brown marking at apex. Stamens well exserted,
declinate; filaments white, up to 12 mm long. Ovary
obovate, pale green, 3^ x 2 mm; style white, up to
9 mm long, protruding beyond stamens as ovary enlarges.
Capsule obovate, membranous, 8-9 x 5 mm. Seed ob-
long, 2-3 mm long, with a narrow decurrent, inflated ter-
minal arillode 0.2 mm long. Figures 7, 8B & 10.
Etymology: named L. xerophila by Schlechter to de-
scribe the preference this species has for growing in dry
places.
Diagnostic characters
L. xerophila is characterised by a dense subspicate or
racemose inflorescence of small oblong-campanulate,
white flowers with very large dull red to dark brown gib-
bosities, and well-exserted, declinate stamens. The sturdy
peduncle and rachis are distinctly swollen, and the erect,
lanceolate, acute, canaliculate leaf has a distinctly undu-
late, and sometimes crisped margin. The seed is unique
within the genus in having a narrow decurrent, inflated
terminal arillode.
L. xerophila is closely related to L. klinghardtiana Din-
ter and L. physocaulos W.F.Barker, which fall into the
group of species having well exserted stamens and a con-
spicuously swollen peduncle and rachis. L. klinghardtiana
also occurs in northwestern Namaqualand, as well as in
the Richtersveld and the southwestern corner of Namibia,
but differs in having larger oblong-campanulate flowers
with much smaller greenish brown to reddish brown gib-
bosities, borne on a less dense, usually shorter inflores-
cence. Further, it differs in having a lanceolate-falcate leaf,
the peduncle usually has greenish brown blotches or spots,
and its seed has a different shape, being globose with an
inflated terminal arillode. L. physocaulos differs from L.
Bothalia27,l (1997)
15
xerophila in having a linear-conduplicate leaf which wid-
ens suddenly into a subterranean clasping base, its flowers
are pale magenta and its very small seeds are globose
with an inflated terminal arillode. The two species are
well separated geographically, as L. physocaidos occurs
only in the Robertson and Swellendam areas of the south-
ern Western Cape. Flowering time: July to September.
Distribution and habitat
Material of this species was first collected by Rudolf
Schlechter on 21st September, 1897 at Leeuwpoort just
north of Concordia, in Namaqualand. He appended the
manuscript name xerophila to this material, and distrib-
uted it to seven overseas and local herbaria (Barker 1983),
where it has languished unpublished for one hundred
years. L xerophila is restricted to the dry northwestern
and central parts of Namaqualand, and western Bushman-
land, where it occurs singly or in colonies in deep red
sand in full sun. The fleshy bulb is deep-seated in order
to survive the harsh dry summer conditions, and may re-
main dormant during the winter growth period if rainfall
is insufficient. In western Bushmanland, an area of pre-
dominantly summer rainfall, L. xerophila nevertheless fol-
lows the typical pattern of winter rainfall growth and
summer dormancy characteristic of the vast majority of
species belonging to this genus.
Material examined
NORTHERN CAPE. — 2816 (Oranjemund): Holgat, Namaqualand,
(-DD), Aug. 1952, Hall 558 (NBG). 2917 (Springbok); Leeuwpoort, 14
km N of Concordia, (-DB), Sept. 1897, Schlechter 11366 (BM, BOL,
G, GRA, K, LD, Z). 2918 (Gamoep): Kennedy’s Farm, 40 km E of
Springbok, (-CA), Sept. 1967, Eliovson 13 (NBG); near Ratelkraal,
Namaqualand, (-CA), Sept. 1950, Barker 6759 (NBG); Kouberg Farm,
off R355 Springbok to Gamoep, Bushmanland, (-CD), Aug. 1972, Botha
s.n. sub. NBG 95451 (NBG). 3018 (Kamiesberg): Vaalputs Farm, 7 km
E of Stofkloof, (-AB), Sept. 1983, Schelpe s.n. sub. NBG 127341 (NBG).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I thank the staff of the Compton Herbarium, Kirsten-
bosch, especially Dr D.A. Paterson-Jones, Dr J.C. Man-
ning, Mrs J. Beyers and Mrs S.E. Foster for their friendly
assistance at various stages of this study. I am also very
grateful to Dr O. A. Leistner for kindly preparing the Latin
diagnoses, Mrs J. Loedolff for taking the black and white
photographs of the herbarium sheets, and Prof. M.C.
Botha and Mr R. Symmonds for assistance in the field.
REFERENCES
BARKER, W.F. 1978. Ten new species of Lachenalia (Liliaceae). Jour-
nal of South African Botany 44: 391^18.
BARKER, W.F. 1979. Ten more new species of Lachenalia (Liliaceae).
Journal of South African Botany 45: 193-219.
BARKER, W.F. 1983a. A list of the Lachenalia species included in
Rudolf Schlechter’s collections made on his collecting trips in
southern Africa, with identifications added. Journal of South Afri-
can Botany 49: 45-55.
BARKER, W.F. 1983b. Six more new species of Lachenalia (Liliaceae).
Journal of South African Botany 49: 423-444.
BARKER, W.F. 1984. Three more new species of Lachenalia and one
new variety of an early species (Liliaceae). Journal of South
African Botany 50: 535-547.
BARKER, W.F. 1987. Five more new species of Lachenalia (Liliaceae-
Hyacinthoideae), four from the Cape Province and one from
southern South West Africa/Namibia. South African Journal of
Botany 53: 166-172.
BARKER, W.F. 1989. New taxa and nomenclatural changes in
Lachenalia (Liliaceae) from the Cape Province. South African
Journal of Botany 55: 630-646.
DUNCAN, G.D. 1987. Lachenalia macgregoriorum. The Flowering
Plants of Africa 49: 1. 1 95 1 .
DUNCAN, G.D. 1988a. The Lachenalia handbook. Annals of Kirsten-
bosch Botanic Gardens 17. National Botanical Institute, Cape
Town.
DUNCAN, G.D. 1988b. Lachenalia arbuthnotiae. The Flowering Plants
of Africa 50: t.mi.
DUNCAN, G.D. 1989. Lachenalia. In B. Jeppe, Spring and winter flow-
ering bulbs of the Cape. Oxford University Press, Cape Town.
DUNCAN, G.D. 1992. Lachenalia: its distribution, conservation status
and taxonomy. Acta Horticulturae 325: 843-845.
DUNCAN, G.D. 1993. Lachenalia thomasiae. The Flowering Plants of
Africa 52: t. 2061.
DUNCAN, G.D. 1994. The genus Lachenalia. and the discovery of a
beautiful new species from the Western Cape Province of South
Africa. Shin-Kaki 163: 32-35.
DUNCAN, G.D. 1996. Four new species and one new subspecies of
Lachenalia (Hyacinthaceae) from arid areas of South Africa.
Bothalia 26; 1-9.
£1
fa^? ;? .'(iwiis nAi la- ^n1^ fiiortsv je 3r>mif«ie0e l^iu
uSMJ-art? gnheqi«a"(i^'ii «*1 .0 iq
ig/iw iS^’i ^fiiii«;fO^ I
i»bi| ortJ, ju 9t<*iB'»iaaB ■>vS«^'’fil'
^4. e .%;- '%
H3£ V, ^ i • ,' ■'- ~h* ^4. *..: ’- i«ir^' ■^^yn. : ' . ■ ^
ms
' .33X11A8 I
i'ta»
‘^'' tWi^.fei- s*H «s vAip/ ©qf^f-sa irtfeWsStti^ W.fcwl ®'i''-
*" * ' * -?£-’~^ <fJ>^{W>^ «v<
asuMis^Wa flto'uKSKvitl
>3 .«{
JKKI , tVffi «’
.«5„
§^::
MW
•yvjo(a{i.J)^m»iA'j&:l^ asSjxjir WtMs VkiIb w.?i*f Aw
Hffrf «ip Ima 80»vy^ 4iqi!£>-'wj» " 4tqn W a'>ir rk hndfftfijliiJMiS Rii5ti«sW irf
ai^iiwtA^ Mtf isfiu^«(£ak.V iJ^b utt iHADHy^
~ '<<^<{6'i|^)ibwiA jkKidtiiiirt jsStoMAn^i «<T ;^fSAl M,0 r«A'
&■.
mcA
'i-V..".*
a ^
w :rMVi->C;
4' ^-4 \a"'V
01 .>-v u,^.’. ;
flAWotiig
JW/<^9^‘?,3a5fl t#*Wi«U;<)t^ r ,fcsTif5Mi>V t«s« .^08^ *,^(^1 , .4^
" %^..:<K.?3 -
i, , , s»'p;.' .-■4,1 4i***-v -I*
?.!i
V '»
»<DS» ,! '->
V-Sf--
1%,- , , ,;£"'^
_ fil
. i93aji4\PA A
■:’» ' -A-'
. ^ :
#•': ^
—.n l' >•”!•■ *• ». r..< . «#T*Ti»' '^..♦'t’
■T-iw* wax-U-f «u| ■ DiMte-* 4mj>if^:
;*'■
n:
:-^: -• ■■• :
>f, !»*’■•«.-.
Jt » _•. . :j^
■ ^-.. .- '■>■,'*’.» i’f|> •■ ';
■*iy 3,1
1 ■- ft J
- K 'S-V-S t» -
«Xt
Bothalia27,I: 17-27 (1997)
Studies in the liverwort genus Fossombronia (Metzgeriales) from southern
Africa. 1. Three new species from Northern Province, Gauteng and Mpu-
malanga
S.M. PEROLD*
Keywords: Fossombronia, Fossombroniaceae, F. gemmifera sp. nov., F. glenii sp. nov., F. straussiana sp. nov., liverworts, Metzgeriales
ABSTRACT
Three new species of Fossombronia from Northern Province, Gauteng and Mpumalanga (formerly Transvaal) are described:
F. gemmifera, F. glenii and F. straussiana. F. gemmifera is distinguished by a highly convoluted pseudoperianth, the frequent
presence of gemmae produced dorsally on the stem, lamellate spores and mostly rather short elaters; F glenii can be recognized
by a smallish, deeply lobed pseudoperianth, perigonial bracts with finger-like projections shielding the antheridia and by spinous
spores; F. straussiana is distinct by its hyaline or brownish rhizoids, by its dense, frilly leaves, its pseudoperianth with lamellate
lateral outgrowths, by spore ornamentation that usually has inclusions in the incomplete areolae and by the elaters which are
finely papillose.
INTRODUCTION
Within the order Metzgeriales the cosmopolitan sim-
ple-thalloid liverwort genus Fossombronia Raddi is clas-
sified in the subfamily Fossombronioideae Engl, emend.
R.M.Schust. (family Fossombroniaceae Hazsl. ( = Co-
doniaceae H.Klinggr.). The Fossombroniaceae is the only
family under the suborder Fossombroniineae R.M.Schust.
and is regarded as phylogenetically pivotal (Solomon
1995). It comprises four genera: Petalophyllwn Nees &
Gottsche ex Fehm., Sewardiella Kashyap, Austrofossom-
broriia R.M.Schust. and Fossombronia, of which only the
latter is known to occur in southern Africa.
Plants of the genus Fossombronia are small, usually
gregarious with mostly prostrate, fleshy stems, laterally
bearing succubously inserted, undulating or crisped thallus
wings, dissected into leaf-like segments and free to the
base, where they are bistratose, but unistratose elsewhere.
The stems are anchored to the substrate by rhizoids which
are usually purple, but hyaline in a few rare species.
The gametangia develop acropetally and are situated
dorsally along the stem between the leaf insertions. They
are either intermingled or borne on separate shoots in
monoicous species, or they may occur on separate plants
in dioicous species. The antheridia are short-stalked, ±
globose and either naked or shielded by perigonial bracts.
The archegonia are exposed, but after fertilization the de-
veloping sporophyte becomes surrounded by a campanu-
late pseudoperianth, constricted at the sometimes stipitate
base, and flaring at the plane, lobulate or crispate mouth.
The globose capsule is raised on a moderately short or
long seta, 6 or 7 to 10 cells in diameter; the capsule wall
is bistratose, the outer wall with delicate, hyaline cells and
the inner wall with irregularly quadrangular cells, contain-
ing nodular and semi-annular thickenings. The walls rup-
ture irregularly into small plates, releasing the spores and
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XlOl, Pretoria 0001.
MS. received: 1996-06-25.
elaters. The spores are relatively large and highly ornamented
with spines, lamellae or areolae. The ornamentation on the
outer face is generally considered species-specific and re-
garded as essential for identification, although ‘so variable
that patterns of ornamentation . . . must be used to define
taxa’ (Schuster 1992). The elaters may be well or occasion-
ally poorly developed and are usually 2- or 3-spiral. The
determination of sterile material is extremely difficult, if not
impossible because of the plasticity of the gametophytes, the
morphology of which varies considerably according to en-
vironmental conditions.
HISTORICAL NOTES
The genus Fossombronia has been relatively poorly
studied in southern Africa. Lehmann (1829) described
Fossombronia (sub Jimgennannia) leucoxantha, collected
by Ecklon on Table Mountain, Devil’s Peak and Lion’s
Head and also reported the presence of F (sub Jiinger-
mannia) pusilla L. on Table Mountain. Gottsche et al.
(1844-1847) confirmed the presence of F pusilla Nees
and described F. crispa Nees from Promontorio Bonae
Spei. Krauss (1846) reported F. angulosa ‘in rupibus ri-
vulor montium natalensium’. Mitten (1878) described F
tumida collected by the Rev. A.E. Eaton at the foot of
Lion’s Head and endorsed the records of F. crispa and F
leucoxantha from localities near Cape Town. Stephani
(1900) described F zeyheri and F. spinifolia. Sim (1926)
added no new species, but Amell (1952) described three
from the Cape: F capensis, F. densilamellata and F mon-
taguensis (Perold 1997: 29). Amell (1963) stated that ‘the
South African species of the genus are in great need of
revision’. Scott & Pike (1984, 1987a-c, 1988a, b), who
studied the genus in Australia (i.e. the western parts of
the State of Victoria and adjacent regions of South Aus-
tralia and New South Wales) for six years and described
many new species from there, expected a comparable spe-
cies richness to emerge from a long-term study of the
genus in South Africa (and South America), since they
regarded its origins to have been mainly in Gond-
wanaland.
18
Bothalia27,l (1997)
FIGURE I . — Fossomhronia gemmifera. A-D, leaves; E, opened pseudoperianth; F, pseudoperianth from side; G-J, perigonial bracts; K, cross section
of stem; L, detail of marginal area of leaf, with slime papilla (see arrow); M, median leaf cells with oil bodies and chloroplasts; N, cells in
capsule wall. A, D. Strauss & Relief CHI 3655, B, C, Perold & Koekemoer 3116b-, E, F, Perold & Van Rooy 3559a', G-N, Strauss 132. Drawn
by G. Condy. Scale bars: A-F, 5(X) pm; G-J, 250 pm; K, 100 pm; L-N, 50 pm.
Bothalia27,l (1997)
19
This paper is the first of a series dealing with southern
African Fossombronia species.
METHODS
Samples of field-collected specimens were transferred
to a conically shaped fme-mesh sieve and washed in a jet
of running water to clear away soil particles. Remaining
particles were manually removed by using fine-tipped for-
ceps. Cross sections were cut of some cleaned stems; several
leaves and a pseudoperianth were detached and all trans-
ferred to a drop of water on a clean slide. Finally a coverslip
was applied to the preparation, which was stored in a covered
plastic dish lined with damp filter paper. During examination
of the slide the evaporated water was periodically replen-
ished. The structures were measured and also photographed
under a compound light microscope.
The remaining portion of the cleaned specimen was
fixed in FAA (formaldehyde/alcohol/glacial acetic acid
and distilled water in proportion of 2:1:1:20). For later
reference some thalli were permanently preserved in FAA,
the remainder only for several hours and then dehydrated
in an ascending series of acetone to 100% and critical
point dried in a Balzers Union dryer, using liquid CO2 as
the transitional fluid. The thalli were mounted on alu-
minium stubs with double-sided Sellotape, gold-coated,
then viewed and photographed, using an ISI SX 25 scan-
ning electron microscope (SEM).
There are some advantages to studying and photo-
graphing Fossombronia material, treated as described
above, with the aid of SEM. Scott & Pike (1984) stated
that the form, colour and orientation of the leaves (of dif-
ferent species) are distinct but ‘beyond our powers to il-
lustrate and exceedingly difficult to describe’. Although
the colour cannot be recorded by SEM, the form and cer-
tainly the orientation of the leaves can. Scott & Pike
(1984) also observed that ‘male plants have often shriv-
elled and disappeared by the time the corresponding
spores are ripe and the gametophyte is then so desiccated
that its pristine vegetative appearance is irrecoverable’.
Samples taken at different stages and treated as above,
would have made comparisons easier for them. Scott &
Pike did not illustrate the plants of any of their new spe-
cies, except F mdis (Scott & Pike 1988b) and relied heav-
ily on descriptions and the spore ornamentation to
distinguish between species.
The spores and elaters were mounted on slides in
Hoyer’s fluid for examination and measurement by LM.
Eor SEM microscopy some spores and elaters from the
same capsule were allowed to air-dry, mounted on stubs
with double-sided Sellotape, gold coated, viewed and
photographed. SEM micrographs of Fossombronia
spores have frequently been published and have been
used as an aid to identification. Features of spore mor-
phology should be used with caution, however, because
they can be rather variable, and the spores need to be
fully mature. The Degree Reference System was used
for recording distribution data (Edwards & Leistner
1971).
I. Fossombronia gemmifera Perold, sp. nov.
Plantae repentes, gregariae vel dispersae; saepe gem-
mas dorsaliter secus caulem ferens. Folia imbricata, fim-
briata, apicem versus aliquando longiora quam latiora,
basin versus plerumque breviora quam latiora, nonnulla
leviter bilobata, alia apicem versus undulata. Rhizoidea
purpurea. Monoicae, interdum ut videtur dioicae.
Antheridia bracteis tecta. Pseudoperianthium breviter
setatum, orificio intricate convoluto, in lobis multis di-
viso. Sporae 55.0-62.5 pm diametro, superficie distali
lamellis minimum 14 irregularibus duplicato-parietatis,
aliquando areolas imperfectas facientibus; superficie
proximali sine nota triradiata distincta, areolis imperfec-
tis, parietibus aids circumcinctis. Elateres 100-160 pm
longi, medio 7.5 pm lati, extremitates versus decre-
scentes, bis vel ter spirales, sed interdum arete spirales,
50.0- 62.5 pm longi, 12.5 pm lati.
TYPE. — Northern Province, 2427 (Thabazimbi):
Kransberg, Farm Geelhoutbosch, on streambank, directly
south of rondavel, (-BC), S. Strauss 132 (PRE, holo.).
2529 (Witbank): ± 80 km E of Pretoria, on PretoriaAVit-
bank road, facing Balmoral turnoff, left side of road at
seepage area, (-CC), Perold & Van Rooy 3559a (PRE,
para.).
Plants smallish to medium-sized, creeping, gregarious
or scattered, green, proximal leaves sometimes clasped
around stem, occasionally with pink margins; shoots sim-
ple, 5.0-9. 0 mm long, 0.85 mm high, 2.6 mm wide, or
once/twice furcate, apical segments moderately divergent
(Figure 2A) 2.0-5.0 mm long, basally ± 3 mm long. Stems
prostrate, in cross section apically 300-325 pm (12 or 13
cell rows) high, 400-500 pm wide, basally 250 x 300 pm,
plano-convex (Figure IK). Rhizoids purple, 12.5-20.0 pm
wide, some with internal mycorrhizal hyphae. Leaves
overlapping, frilly, obliquely inserted succubously, vari-
ously shaped, toward apex sometimes longer than wide,
but more proximally usually shorter than wide, 925-1525
X 1325-1625 pm, some slightly bilobed (Figure lA, D),
others ruched above (Figure IB, C); lateral margins with
3 or 4 uni- or bi-celled slime papillae (Figure IL). Leaf
cells thin-walled, at upper margins subquadrate to rectan-
gular across, 32.5-50.0 x 22.5-30.0 pm, at lateral margins
long-rectangular, up to 75 x 30 pm; upper laminal cells
(4-)5- or 6-sided or polygonal, 32.5-50.0 x 22.5-30.0 pm,
middle laminal cells 62.5-72.5 x 37.5-50.0 pm, basal
cells 112.5-137.5 x 37.5-62.5 pm. Oil bodies glistening,
13-36 per cell, rounded, up to ± 3.5 pm in diameter; chlo-
roplasts numerous, round or oblong, 5.0-7.5 pm in diame-
ter (Figure IM).
?Monoicous, some specimens with shoots bearing both
antheridia and archegonia, but occasionally only
antheridia or often only archegonia present. Antheridia
dorsal on stem, interspersed between archegonia, short-
stalked, globose, ± 185 pm in diameter, shielded by an
irregularly shaped perigonial bract (Figure 2C), 500-700
X 380^50 pm, margins toothed, with projecting cells and
slime papillae (Figure IG-J), cells in interior 4-6-sided,
80.0- 90.0 X 30.0-37.5 pm; sometimes antheridia in
groups between leaves and then lacking bracts or with
reduced bracts (Figure 2B). Archegonia numerous along
stem, naked, up to 3 per shoot becoming fertilized, soon
20
Bothalia27,l (1997)
FIGURE 2. — Fossombronia gemmifera. A, stem branching near apex, bracts and pseudoperianth with capsule shown; B, antheridia between leaves;
C, detail of perigonial bracts with mostly obscured antheridia and young fertilized archegonia; D, convoluted pseudoperianth from above; E,
archegonia and gemmae between leaves; F, close-up of gemmae. A, C, D, Strauss 132\ B, Perold & Koekemoer 3116b\ E, F, Perold & Van
Rooy 3557. A, x 13; B, x 26; C, x 21; D, E, x 20; F, x 54.
forming young pseudoperianths. Pseudoperianths often
crowded together, in acropetal sequence, raised on a short
stalk, ± 210 X 470 pm, widely flaring above (Figure IF),
± 900 pm long, up to 2000 pm wide across intricately
convoluted mouth (Figure 2D), divided into numerous
lobes (Figure IE), 200-500 x 150-440 pm, some apically
rounded, others with an acute apex ending in a papilla;
cells comparable in shape and size to those of leaves.
Capsules globose (Figure 2D), up to ± 600 pm in diame-
ter, enveloped in a calyptra which is later shed, capsule
wall bistratose, cells in inner layer irregularly shaped,
27.5-50.0 X 25.0-37.5 pm, each cell wall with (1)2^
nodular and occasionally semi-annular thickenings (Figure
IN). Seta delicate, 1.2-3. 2 mm long, 270-350 pm in di-
ameter, 6 cells across. Spores brown, hemispherical (Fig-
ure 3C), 55.0-62.5 pm in diameter, including lamellae
projecting around circumference, distal face convex
(Figure 3A, B), with at least 14 irregular, mostly double-
walled lamellae running across, ± 7.5 pm apart, occasion-
ally anastomosing and forming incomplete areolae;
proximal face (Figure 3D, E) lacking distinct triradiate
mark, ornamentation seemingly ‘raised’ from an encir-
cling, marginal furrow (Figure 3E), tall walls forming
small, irregular, incomplete areolae, up to 5 pm wide,
around periphery 19-22 projecting ‘ends’ of lamellae, ±
5 pm long. Elaters (Figure 3F) yellow-brown, smooth,
mostly rather small and sometimes poorly formed,
(50.0-)62.5-85.0 pm long, medianly 12.5 pm wide, 3(^)-
spiral and loosely coiled, tapering toward tips, 5 pm wide
and ending in bispiral loops, rarely 100-160 pm long, 7.5
pm wide medianly, 3-spiral. Vegetative reproduction by
gemmae (Figure 2E, F), abundantly borne dorsally along
stem, short-stalked, spindle-shaped, up to 300 x 170 pm,
green when fresh, turning brown with age.
Fossombronia gemmifera grows on sandy loam soil on
stream banks or at seepages, often mixed with mosses or
other Fossombronia species, particularly F. straussiana,
which has hyaline rhizoids and is thus easily distinguished
from it. This new species is quite distinctive with its
highly convoluted pseudoperianth and by the frequent
presence of dorsal gemmae for which it has been named.
Its spore ornamentation with double-walled lamellae on
the distal face and ‘raised’ on the proximal face above a
clear marginal furrow, is also unique. There are two other
species with purple rhizoids from the same distribution
area: F glenii which has spinous spores and F zeyheri
which has reticulate spores. Fossombronia gemmifera has
been collected at several localities in Northern Province
and Gauteng (Figure 4).
2. Fossombronia glenii Perold, sp. nov.
Plantae repentes, gregariae vel crebrae in coloniis. Fo-
lia imbricata, undulata, valde obliquiter inserta, plerumque
oblonga, longiora quam latiora, apicem versus latiora
quam basi, apice subtruncata, lobis vadosis, angulatis. Rhi-
zoidea purpurea. Dioicae. Antheridia bracteis cum laciniis
digitiformibus tecta. Pseudoperianthium infundibulifor-
me, orificio in lobis pluribus diviso, aliquot ad basin di-
visis. Sporae 40.0-52.5 pm diametro, superficie distali
cum spinis multis altis conicis, raro fractis vel cristis bre-
vibus junctis; superficie proximali sine nota triradiata
distincta, cum tuberculis multis tenuibus vel grossis in-
spersis. Elateres 70.0-137.5 x 7.5-10.0 pm, bis vel ter
spirales.
TYPE. — Northern Province, 2427 (Thabazimbi): Water-
berg, Welgevonden Estate, cliffs at drift over Sterkstroom
above farmhouse, in partial shade, with Fissidens erosulus
(Mull.Hal.) Paris, (-BD), H.F Glen 2146 (PRE, holo.);
H.F Glen 2134, same locality (PRE, para.).
Bothalia27,l (1997)
21
FIGURE 3. — Fossombronia gemmifera. Spores and elater. A, B, distal face; C, side view of distal face; D, E, proximal face; F, elater. A, B, D, S.M.
Perold2017\ C, E, F, Strauss 132. A, x 734; B, D, x 688; C, E, F, x 535.
Plants medium-sized, creeping, gregarious or in
crowded colonies, green; shoots mostly simple, 5.0-7.0
mm long, 1.8 mm high, 3.0 mm wide, occasionally once
furcate close to apex (Figure 6A) or to base (Figure 6B),
moderately to widely divergent, apical segments 2-5 mm
long. Stems prostrate, fleshy, in cross section at apex
400-500 pm (13 cell rows) high, 530-650 pm wide, ta-
pering proximally, at base (300-) 400^50 x 400-480 pm,
plano-convex (Figure 51). Rhizoids purple, 12-20 pm
wide. Leaves overlapping, undulating, very obliquely in-
serted succubously, generally oblong, longer than wide
and wider above than basally, 2000-2500 pm long, width
1325-2500 pm above, 1050-1400 pm below, apex sub-
truncate, with shallow angular lobes (Figure 5A-F); mar-
gins with or without 1 or 2 slime papillae, the lower one
on proximal edge of leaf below midline often 2-celled
(Figure 5N). Leaf cells thin-walled, at upper margins
subquadrate, 25-30 x 32^5 pm, at lateral margins long-
rectangular, up to 87.5 X 22.5 pm; upper laminal cells 5-
or 6-sided, 57.5-75.0 x 27.5-37.5 pm; middle laminal
cells 62.5-102.5 x 42.5 x 47.5 pm; basal cells 75.0-87.5
X 37.5^0.0 pm. Oil bodies glistening, numerous, more
than 50 per cell, up to 2.5 pm in diameter; chloroplasts
densely scattered in cells when fresh, but later tending to
clump together, ± 5 pm in diameter (Figure 50).
Dioicous. Male plants hardly smaller than females.
Antheridia dorsal between leaves, in a row, white when
immature, later turning yellow, globose (Figure 6C), short-
stalked, ± 210 pm in diameter, posteriorly shielded by
perigonial bracts (Figure 5J-M), ± 550 x 370 pm, cells
in interior subquadrate to hexagonal, 45.0-62.5 x
40.0-42.5 pm, apices divided into (2)3 or 4 finger-like
projections (Figure 6C), 150-300 pm long and 1 or 2 cell
rows wide. Archegonia naked, in an interrupted, irregular
row or in groups dorsally along the stem (Figure 6D).
Pseudoperianths produced in acropetal sequence, 1 or 2
per shoot, the younger one near the apex and the other
(if present) usually more proximally, but occasionally in
close proximity; sessile, ± funnel-shaped (Figure 5H), at con-
stricted base 425-525 pm wide, up to 1750 pm long, width
across flaring mouth 2250-2375 pm, consisting of (4)5 or 6
lobes (Figure 6E), with 1-4(5) deep clefts to near the base
(Figure 5G), apices truncate, entire, or with sharply pointed
projections; cells comparable in shape and size to those of
leaves. Capsules globose, ± 625 pm in diameter, initially
entirely enveloped in calyptra, which is later shed, revealing
capsule wall (Figure 6F), the latter bistratose, the inner cell
layer with irregularly quadrangular cells, 32.5-37.5 x
20.0-37.5 pm, at each cell wall 2 or 3 nodular and sometimes
semi-annular thickenings, (Figure 5P). Seta delicate, up to
5.6 mm long, 110 pm in diameter. Spores brown, ± hemi-
spherical (Figure 7D), 40.0-52.5 pm in diameter; distal face
convex, usually covered with numerous tall, conical spines
up to 5 pm long (Figure 7A), rarely broken (Figure 7B), and
FIGURE 4. — Map showing distribution of F. gemmifera, □; F. glenii, •;
and F. straussiana, O, in Northern Province, Gauteng and Mpu-
malanga.
22
Bothalia27,l (1997)
FIGURE 5. — Fossomhwnia f’lenii. A-F, leaves; G, opened pseudoperianth; H, pseudoperianth from side; I, stem in cross section; J-M, perigonial
bracts; N, detail of marginal area of leaf, with slime papilla (see arrow); O, median leaf cells with oil bodies and chloroplasts; P, cells in
capsule wall. A-C, E-K, M-P, S.M. Perold 3052', D, L, Glen 2134. Drawings by G. Condy, Scale bars: A-H, 500 pm; J-M, 250 pm; 1, 100
pm; N-P, 50 pm.
Bothalia27,l (1997)
23
FIGURE 6. — Fossombronia glenii. A, stem branching near apex; B, stem branching near base; C, antheridia shielded by perigonial bracts; D,
archegonia naked along stem, young pseudoperianth near apex; E, pseudoperianth with capsule from above; F, close-up of capsule in
pseudoperianth. A, Perold & Van Rooy 3569\ B-E, Perold & Van Rooy 3568', F, Glen 2134. A, B, D, E, x 7; C, x 15; F, x 23.
sometimes connected by short ridges, even occasionally
forming some high-walled areolae (Figure 7C); proximal
face ± flat, lacking a distinct triradiate mark, sprinkled
with numerous fine to coarse tubercles (Figure 7E), which
are sometimes rather flattened; circumference with numer-
ous, up to 45, projecting spines. Elaters yellow, smooth,
70.0-137.5 pm long, 7.5-10.0 pm wide in middle and
tapering slightly toward tips, 2- (Figure 7F) and some-
times 3-spiral in the same elater.
Fossombronia glenii grows on rather sandy soil in dry
stream beds or on stream banks, or else on soil pockets
in exposed roeky cliffs above streams. So far, it has only
been collected at a few localities in Northern Province,
Gauteng and Mpumalanga (Figure 4), but it is surely more
widespread. It is easily recognized by the rather small
pseudoperianth split into several lobes, by perigonial bracts
with finger-like projections and by spinous spores. Beeause
of its spinous spores, a specimen collected by Mogg (CH
FIGURE 7. — Fossombronia glenii. Spores and elater. A-C, distal face; D, side view of distal face; E, proximal face; F, elater. A, F, Glen 2146', B,
D, Mogg CHI 57. C, S.M. Perold 3052', E, Glen 2134. A. x 562, B, x 700; C, x 737; D, x 694; E, x 582; F, x 575.
24
Bothalia 27,1 (1997)
157) at Wonderboom Poort, Pretoria, was previously misi-
dentified as the so-called F. crispa, but the name had been
misapplied (Perold b in press). Fossombronia glenii is dis-
tinguished from the winter rainfall species, F leucoxantha,
by the dentate leaves and pseudoperianths (Perold a in press).
Both species have spinous spores.
This species is named in honour of an esteemed col-
league at the National Botanical Institute, Dr H.F. Glen,
who has often collected liverworts, together with his wife,
Mrs R. Glen (another colleague) and their young daughter,
Melissa.
3. Fossombronia straussiana Perold, sp. nov.
Plantae repentes, crebrae in coloniis. Folia plerumque
valde convoluta, dense imbricata, irregulariter formata,
longiora vel breviora quam latiora, interdum cum appen-
diculo oblongo in basi proximali. Rhizoidea hyalina vel
brunnescentia. Monoicae. Antheridia archegoniaque con-
ferta, appendiculo foliari basali partialiter circumdata.
Pseudoperianthium campanulatum, orificio patent! lobati,
processibus plures lamellatis lateraliter procurrentibus.
Sporae 35.0-42.5 pm diametro distaliter usque ad 10
lamellis discontinuis, cristis tenuibus interjunctis,
aliquando areolas imperfectas facientibus, saepe inclu-
sionibus papilliformibus vel cruciformibus; superficie
proximali cum nota triradiata imperfecta, non valde
distincta, superficiebus cum papillis humilibus et cristis
irregularibus brevibus tectis. Elateres 107.5-175.0 pm
longi, ter vel bis spirales, papillis tenuibus humilibus tecti.
TYPE. — Northern Province, 2427 (Thabazimbi); Krans-
berg. Farm Geelhoutbosch, on streambank, directly south
of rondavel, (-BC), S. Strauss 133 (PRE, holo.); S. Strauss
134, same locality (PRE, para.).
Plants medium-sized, creeping, in crowded colonies,
green; shoots simple, up to 9.5 mm long, 1.4 mm high,
2.3-3. 0 mm wide, or once-furcate, apical segments nar-
rowly divergent (Eigure 9A), 4.5-7 .5 mm long, basal part
3.0- 4. 5 mm long. Stems prostrate, fleshy, in cross section
at apex (300-)400-500 pm (13 cell rows) high, 550-680
pm wide, tapering basally to 300 x 320 pm, plano-convex
(Figure 8K). Rhizoids of all plants entirely hyaline or
brownish, 10.0-12.5 pm wide. Leaves mostly highly con-
voluted, densely imbricate (Figure 9B), obliquely inserted
succubously, irregularly shaped, longer than wide (Figure
8B, C) to shorter than wide (Figure 8A, E, E), (575-)
1300-1500 X (850-) 1025- 1500 pm, sometimes with an
oblong appendage at proximal base (Figure 8C, D), ± 675
X 500 pm; margins with up to 8 slime papillae at angu-
lations or in between, 22.5-27.5 x 22.5-25.0 pm. Leaf
cells thin-walled, at upper margins subquadrate or rectan-
gular across (Figure 8L), 25.0-27.5 x 30.0-40.0 pm; at
lower lateral margins long-rectangular, up to 47.5 x 22.5
pm; upper laminal cells subquadrate, 25.0-32.5 x
30.0- 32.5 pm; middle laminal cells 5- or 6-sided,
47.5-62.5 X 27.5-40.0 pm; basal cells 70.0-75.0 x 50.0
pm. Oil bodies glistening, faintly granular, 10-25 per cell,
up to 2.5 pm in diameter; chloroplasts densely scattered
in cells, 3-5 pm in diameter (Figure 8M).
Monoicous. Antheridia short-stalked, globose, 1 10-135
pm in diameter, dorsal on stem between leaves, basal leaf
appendage partly curved around 1 or 2 (Figure 9D, E),
sometimes leaf appendage detached, forming an oblong
perigonial bract (Figure 8J), 430-620 x 300-420 pm, mar-
gin with 1 or 2 papillae. Archegonia in close proximity
to antheridia. Pseudoperianths soon forming (Figure 9C)
after fertilization in acropetal sequence, often 2 per shoot,
close together near apex, older more proximal one some-
times with capsule already dehisced; sessile, campanulate
(Figure 9F), at constricted base ± 600 pm wide, 1250 pm,
rarely to 1825 pm long, width across flaring mouth 2250
pm, margin ± scalloped, consisting of 4-7 shallow,
rounded lobes (Figure 8H), several lamellate outgrowths
projecting laterally from sides (Figure 81); cells compara-
ble in shape and size to those of leaves. Capsules globose,
500-610 pm in diameter, capsule wall bistratose, cells in
inner layer irregularly shaped, 30.0-37.5 x 15.0-20.0 pm,
crowded with nodular and some semi-annular thickenings
(Figure 8N). Seta 2.25-4.0 mm long, 140-150 pm in di-
ameter, 6 ox 1 cells across (Figure 8G). Spores light
brown, hemispherical (Figure lOB), 35.0^2.5 pm in di-
ameter, including marginally projecting lamellae; distal
face convex (Figure lOA, C, D), ornamented with up to
10 discontinuous lamellae, ± 2.5 pm long and 5. 0-7.5 pm
apart, but interconnected with faint cross ridges, some-
times forming incomplete areolae and frequently with pa-
pilla-like or cross-like inclusions; proximal face (Figure
lOE) with incomplete and not very distinct triradiate mark,
facets covered with low papillae and short irregular ridges,
up to 25 lamellae projecting around periphery. Elaters
light brown, 107.5-175.0 pm long, 7.5 pm wide in middle,
tapering to ends, 3-spiral or partly 2-spiral, covered with
fine, low papillae (Figure lOF).
Fossombronia straussiana is often mixed with other
Fossombronia species and grows on streambanks and in
seepage areas at several localities in the Northern Province
and Gauteng (Figure 4). More specimens of it, J. Braggins
91/191 and S.M. Perold 2654, were collected in 1991 in
Malawi on the Zomba Plateau, as well as at Nyika Nat.
Park, S.M. Perold 2663] thus it appears to be widespread.
Vanden Berghen (1965) reported F. husnotii (with hyaline
rhizoids) from the Congo Republic, Symoens 4329, and
from Tanzania ( = Tanganyika), Bryan 1036. The spores
of these specimens have much taller lamellae than those
F. straussiana and also appear to differ from those of F.
husnotii. In 1978 Vanden Berghen reported F. husnotii
from Shaba, Zaire (Malaisse 9039), without mentioning
the rhizoids, but presumably referred here because they
are hyaline. Scott & Pike (1988a) comment that the spores
of F. husnotii are extraordinarily variable and that more
research is required. Beside F. husnotii, which has mostly
hyaline rhizoids, Scott & Pike (1984) also described three
new Australian species, F. punctata, F. scrobiculata and
F. vermiculata, as having hyaline rhizoids on all or on
most plants.
Fossombronia straussiana has been named in honour
of Mrs Susan Strauss, owner of the Farm Geelhoutbosch,
where she has collected it a number of times, together
with other Fossombronia species.
This species is easily distinguished by its hyaline or
brownish rhizoids and dense, frilly leaves, its pseudope-
rianth with lamellate, lateral outgrowths, by the spore or-
namentation that usually has incomplete areolae with
Bothalia27,l (1997)
25
FIGURE 8. — Fossombronia straussiana. A-F, leaves; G, cross section of seta; H, opened pseudoperianth; 1, pseudoperianth from side; J, perigonial
bract and 2 antheridia; K, cross section of stem; L, detail of leaf margin; M, median leaf cells with oil bodies and chloroplasts; N, cells in
capsule wall. A-C, E, F, H, I, K, N, Strauss & Relief CHI 3655; D, J, Perold & Koekemoer 3116a; G, Strauss CHI 3653; L, M, Strauss
CH13651. Drawings by G. Condy. Scale bars; A-F, H, I, 500 pm; G, K, 100 pm; J, 250 pm; L-N, 50 pm.
26
Bothalia27,l (1997)
FIGURE 9. — Fossomhronia strcmssiana. A, stem branching near apex; B, leaves crowded on stem; C, antheridium and archegonium in close proximity
between leaves; D, proximal leaf appendage curved around gametangia; E, close-up of same; F, pseudoperianth with seta emerging from it.
A, F, Strauss 133', B, Perold & Koekemoer 3124a', C-E, Perold & Koekemaer 3116a. A, x 7; B, x 10; C, x 66; D, x 15; E, x 106; F, x 23.
inclusions and by the usually finely papillose elaters. The
specimen, Scott 13, has a larger and more elaborate
pseudoperianth than those usually encountered in this spe-
cies. Its spore ornamentation is very similar, however, and
the rhizoids are hyaline.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I wish to thank the referees of this article. Dr E.O.
Campbell and Prof R. Stottler for their constructive com-
ments as well as the kind people who have collected
specimens for me, particularly Dr H.F. Glen and Mrs
Susan Strauss, also my colleagues at the National Bo-
tanical Institute, Ms Marinda Koekemoer and Mr Jac-
ques van Rooy who helped me with fieldwork. Many
thanks to Dr Glen for translating the diagnoses into
Latin, Mrs J. Mulvenna and Ms D. Maree for typing
the manuscript, Ms G. Condy for the drawings and Mrs
A. Romanowski for developing and printing many pho-
tographs.
FIGURE 1 0, — Fossomhronia straussiana. Spores and elater. A, C, D, distal face; B, side view of distal face; E, proximal face; F, elater. A, B, E, Scott 13',
C, Strauss & Retief CHI 3655, D, S.M. Perold 32H0', F, Perold & Koekemoer 3124a. A, C, x 121', B, x 1084; D, x 588; E, x 674; F, x 839.
Bothalia27,l (1997)
27
REFERENCES
ARNELL, S.W, 1952. Hepaticae collected in South and West Africa
(1951). New and little known species. Botanislai Notiser 105;
307-329.
ARNELL, S.W. 1963. Hepaticae of South Africa. Swedish Natural Sci-
ence Council, Stockholm.
EDWARDS, D. & LEISTNER, O.A. 1971 . A degree reference system for
citing biological records in southern Africa. Mitteilungen der
Botanischen Staatssammlung, Munchen 10: 501-509.
GOTTSCHE, C.M., LINDENBERG, J.B.G. & NEES AB ESENBECK,
C.G. 1844-1847. Synopsis hepaticarum. Hamburg, Meissner. Re-
printed 1967, Cramer, Lehre.
KRAUSS, F. 1846. Pflanzen des Cap- und Natal-Landes, gesammelt und
zusammengestellt von Dr Ferdinand Krauss. Flora 29: 135, 136.
LEHMANN, J.G.C. 1829. Hepaticarum capensium a C.F Ecklon. Lin-
naeaA-. 357-371.
MITTEN, W. 1878. List of Hepaticae collected by Rev. A.E. Eaton at the
Cape of Good Hope (Aug. & Sept. 1874). Journal of the Linnean
Society (Bot.) 16: 187-197.
PEROLD, S.M. 1997. Studies in the liverwort genus Fossombronia
(Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 2. An amendment to three
species from Western Cape, described by S.W. Amell. Bothedia
27: 29-38.
PEROLD, S.M. a in press. Studies in the liverwort genus Fossombronia
(Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 4. A re-examination of F.
crispa, F. leucoxantha and F. tumida. Bothalia.
PEROLD, S.M. b in press. The lectotypification of Fossombronia crispa.
Bothalia.
SCHUSTER, R.M. 1992. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of North
America. Vol.5. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago.
SCOTT, G.A.M. & PIKE, D.C. 1984. New species of Fossombronia from
Australia. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 56:
339-349.
SCOTT, G.A.M. & PIKE, D.C. 1987a. The Fossombronia foveolata
complex. Lindbergia 13: 79-84.
SCOTT, G.A.M. & PIKE, D C. 1987b. Studies on Fossombronia in
Australia. 11. Fourteen more new species. Journal of the Hattori
Botanical Laboratory 62: 367-386.
SCOTT, G.A.M. & PIKE, D.C. 1987c. Studies on Fossombronia in
Australia. III. Taxonomic and nomenclatural problems. Journal of
the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 63: 99-105.
SCOTT, G.A.M. & PIKE, D.C. 1988a. Revisionary notes on Fossom-
bronia. The Bryologist 9\ : 193-201.
SCOTT, G.A.M. & PIKE, D.C, 1988b. A new species of Fossombronia
from Australia. Beiheft zur Nova Hedwigia 90: 109-112.
SIM, TR. 1926. The Bryophyta of South Africa. Transactions of the
Royal Society of South Africa 15: 1^75. Cape Town.
SOLOMON, J.C. 1995. (ed.) Herbarium News 15 (11/12): 66. Missouri
Botanical Garden.
STEPHANI, F \900. Species hepaticarum No\. 1. Geneva.
VANDEN BERGHEN, C. 1965. Hepatiques recoltees par le Dr J.-J.
Symoens dans la region peri-tanganyikaise. Bulletin de la Societe
Royale de Botanique de Belgique 98: 129-174.
VANDEN BERGFIEN, C. 1978. Hepatiques du Shaba. Corrections et
additions. Bulletin du Jardin botanique rmtioruil de Belgique 48:
367-372.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
Held at PRE, unless otherwise indicated. Bracketed
numbers after citation of collector’s name and collecting
number refer to the species described in the text in alpha-
betical order, namely: F. gemmifera (1); F. glenii (2); and
F straussiana (3).
Braggins 91/191 (3) (Malawi).
Glen 2134 (2) (paratype), 2146 (2) (holotype).
Koekemoer 976 (2).
Mogg CH157 (2) BOL, PRE.
Perold S.M. 2017 (1); 3052 (2); 3280, 3281, 2654 (Malawi), 2663
(Malawi) (3). Perold & Koekemoer 3116a, 3124a (3); 3116b, 3124b,
3129 (1). Perold & Van Rooy 3555, 3559a (paratype). 3564, 3565 (1);
3568, 3569 (2).
Scott 13 (3) CH3697. Strauss 132 (1) (holotype), 133 (3) (holotype), 134
(3) (paratype), CH13651, CH13653, CH13654 (3). Strauss & Retief
CH13655 (3).
Wager 14 (3).
,■ ^(Mjrin, so».tav«w««wiS ■WCl'A'^ »»l'w''^'v»«rt to .js.wq iu CM/2
-- - - ^ - - — - ■ ■^' -■ — - - - - — — -”'“"^::aSrkt^to3'
• '•• ' kv ' K' «. kM ft • ■
•1. -i—riS^.-.^-a ^t»* »A'&f :5.^rs »Vta A hA-A.ti TTVY
■Sis
Bothalia 27,1:29-38 (1997)
Studies in the liverwort genus Fossombronia (Metzgeriales) from southern
Afilca. 2. An amendment to three species from Western Cape, described by
S.W.AmeU
S.M. PEROLD*
Keywords: Fossombronia, F. capensis, F. densilamellata, F. montaguensis, Hepaticae, Metzgeriales, southern Africa, Western Cape
ABSTRACT
Subsequent to his visit to South Africa in 1951, S.W. Arnell ( 1 952), described three new Fossombronia species from Western
Cape, namely F. capensis, F. densilamellata and F. montaguensis. Unfortunately, however, they were not described in detail, nor
were they fully illustrated. An attempt is hereby made to augment Arnell’s descriptions and to illustrate his species more
completely, with the aid of drawings and SEM micrographs. A distribution map is also provided. Scott & Pike (1988), after
examining many Fossombronia specimens of world-wide origin, concluded that the above three species were good species, a
conclusion 1 support.
1. Fossombronia capensis S.W. Arnell in Botaniska
Notiser 3: 314 ( 1952); S.W. Arnell: 81 (1963). Type: Western
Cape, 3423 (Knysna): Bracken Hill Forest, (-AA), roadside,
5.W Arnell 1376 (S, holo.!; PRE, iso.).
Plants in crowded colonies, green; shoots medium-
sized in male plants, 10-15 mm long, 1. 3-2.0 mm high,
2. 8-3.0 mm wide; female plants more common and
rather larger, simple, up to 18 mm long, 1.5-2. 5 mm
high, 2. 5^.0 mm wide, or once/twice to repeatedly fur-
cate, segments moderately to widely divergent, 4.0-6.0
mm long. Stems prostrate, tapering proximally, chloro-
phyllose, occasionally ventral row of cells purple, some-
times with a lateral bud or side branch, plano-convex in
cross section, in male plants (Figure II) 250-350 pm (11
cell rows) high, 420-610 pm wide, in female plants (Fig-
ure IJ) 270-350 pm (10-12 cell rows) high, 400-610
pm wide. Rhizoids purple, ± 15 pm wide. Leaves over-
lapping, widely spreading, succubously inserted (Figure 2A),
apically small, free margin rounded, soon becoming larger,
obovate, short- or long-rectangular, or irregularly shaped, oc-
casionally slightly notched and shortly bilobed; in male
plants rather smaller (Figure lA-D), 1125-1375 x
1225-1350 pm; in female plants (Figure lE-G) mostly
larger, 1000-2750 x 1150-2575 pm above, sometimes,
when sides not parallel, narrower below, 1075-1750 pm
wide; margins almost entire or with ± 6 well-spaced slime
papillae, ± 25.0 x 17.5 pm. Leaf cells thin-walled, in male
plants not appreciably different from those of females, at
upper margins (Figure IH) rectangular across, 22.5-32.5
X 37.5-45.0 pm, at lateral margins long-rectangular,
40.0-62.5 X 20.0-25.0 pm, upper laminal cells 5- or 6-
sided, 37.5-57.5 x 35.0-50.0 pm, middle laminal cells
(Figure IK) 65.0-87.5 x 50.0-57.5 pm, basal cells
67.5-87.5 X 50.0-62.5 pm. Oil bodies quite variable in
number, 17-37 per cell, larger ones ± 5 pm in diameter
and granular, others much smaller and smooth; chloro-
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X 10 1, Pretoria 0001 .
MS. received: 1996-10-08.
plasts numerous, mostly rounded, ± 5 pm in diameter,
sometimes elongate, 7.5 pm long (Figure IK).
Dioicous. Antheridia dorsal on stem, generally in 2
crowded rows (Figure 2B), short-stalked, globose or ovoid,
160-250 pm in diameter, each shielded by a bract (Figure
IM-P), 480-770 X 330-640 pm, sometimes 2 adjacent
ones joined together, margins with 3 or 4 projecting pa-
pillae or processes, cells in interior 4- or 5-sided, 42.5-75.0
X 37.5-67.5 pm. Archegonia in 1 or 2 rows (Figure 2C,
D) along stem, naked; sometimes several per branch, at
intervals (Figure 2E) or 2 adjacent, becoming fertilized.
Pseudoperianth (Figure IQ, R) campanulate, proximal to
apex, as tall as leaves or projecting somewhat above them,
raised on a short stalk, then widely Haring above,
1875-2125 pm long, 1625-2125 pm wide across mouth,
margin with 10-15 angular projections, each with a pa-
pilla, ± 20.0 X 17.5 pm, often with winged outgrowths on
outside (Figure 2F); cells comparable in shape and size
to those of leaves. Capsules globose, ± 850 pm in diame-
ter, wall bistratose, cells in inner layer irregularly shaped
(Figure IT), 32.5-50.0 x 27.5-35.0 pm, each cell wall
with 1-3 dark brown, nodular and sometimes semi-annu-
lar thickenings. Seta 2. 8-4.0 mm long, 250-300 pm in
diameter, 6-8 cells across (Figure IF). Spores golden
brown to brown, hemispherical, 42.5-55.0 pm in diameter,
including lamellae projecting at margin; distal face (Figure
3A, B) convex, with up to 8 lamellae, ± 5 pm high and
5-10 pm apart running across face, sometimes in different
directions or parallel to each other (Figure 3C), occasion-
ally anastomosing and forming a few to several areolae,
surface between lamellae with fine cross striations (Figure
3D); proximal face (Figure 3E) lacking triradiate mark,
flat, covered with irregularly shaped papillae and short
ridges, sometimes with scattered granules, 12-16 ‘spines’
(i.e. ‘end-on’ view of terminations of lamellae from the
distal face) projecting around spore periphery and
joined by a 5 pm wide, incomplete membranous wing
or perispore. Elaters (Figure IS) mostly delicate, outer
wall collapsing on drying, rather short and stout, blunt at
tips, 62.5-125.0 x 10.0-12.5 pm, loose spirals faintly
greenish yellow, strands often difficult to distinguish, but
30
Bothalia27,l (1997)
FIGURE 1 -Fossombronia capensis. A-D, male leaves; E-G, female leaves; H. detail of upper margin of leaf; I, cross section of male stem J cross
section of female stem; K, median leaf cells with oil bodies (solid lines) and chloroplasts (dotted lines); L, cross section of seta M P bracte,
Q, opened pseudoperianth; R, pseudoperianth from side; S,. S2, elaters; T, cells in capsule wall. A, ^,Koekemoer 998, C-K M-R, S.M.
Perold 3494\ L. S. T, S.M. Perold 3492. Scale bars; A-G, Q, R, 500 pm; I, J, M-P, 250 pm; L, 100 pm; H, K, T. 50 pm, Si, S2, 25 pm.
Bothalia27,l (1997)
31
FIGURE 2. — Fossombronia capensis. A, thallus branches; B, male plants with rows of bracts; C, female plant with 1 or 2 rows of archegonia; D,
detail of female plant with archegonia; E, female plant with 2 pseudoperianths; F, young pseudoperianth from above with outgrowth (see
arrow). A, S.M. Perold 3497'. B-F, Koekemoer 998. A, B, C, E, x 7; D, F, x 30.
sometimes better developed, with brown rings or even
3 spirals and narrowed at tips, 5 pm wide (Figure
3F).
The correct collector’s number of the holotype speci-
men is Arnell 1376 and not 1876 (Amell 1952). Fossom-
bwnia capensis is confined to the southeastern Western
Cape, in the winter rainfall region (Figure 4). It grows on
soil, rarely extending onto slate, in forests, at roadsides,
or in clearings, on streambanks or on vertical, shaded rock
walls in soil pockets. It is distinguished by the relatively
large size of the female plants with overlapping leaves
and exposed stems, by fairly common, smaller male plants
with large bracts subtending 2 rows of adjacent antheridia,
by the spore ornamentation with widely separated lamel-
lae and marginally by 12-16 projecting ‘spines’ joined by
FIGURE 3. — Fossombronia capensis. Spores. A, B, distal face; C, side view of distal face; D, detail of lamellae and spore surface on distal face; E,
proximal face; F, elaters. A, Arnell 1783', B, Arnell 1555', C, S.M. Perold 3494', D, Arnell 1470', E, Koekemoer 998', F, Arnell 1477. A, x 612;
B, X 672; C, x 625; D, x 2755; E, x 739; F, x 406.
32
Bothalia 27,1 (1997)
FIGURE 4. — The distribution of Fossombronia capemis, •; F. densi-
lamellata, ▲; and F. montaguensis, ■, in southern Africa.
an incomplete membranous wing or perispore and also by
generally reduced, delicate elaters. Arnell (1952, 1963) re-
ferred to the latter as ‘leaf-like’. Poorly formed elaters are
also present in F. cristula (Piippo 1991; Scott & Pike
1987) and in F. foveolata var. cristula (Schuster 1992).
Schuster treated cristula as a variety of F. foveolata, al-
though it is regarded by Scott & Pike (1987) as a complex
[in which they include the southern African F. zeyheri
(Perold in press)]. According to Scott & Pike (1987), cu-
rious and variously malformed elaters are quite common
and they found cristula-type. elaters occurring in individu-
als apparently belonging to a number of other taxa, with
spores unlike those of the F foveolata complex. They ad-
mit, however, that F cristula and F foveolata are perhaps
not distinct, but on the evidence of dioicism versus
monoicism, they presently maintain them as separate spe-
cies. All F capensis specimens are dioicous and those
from the George/Knysna/Brackenfell/Gouna and Deep
Walls Forests and Diep River areas have poorly formed elat-
ers. Collections from the nearby Bloukranz Pass {LUbenau-
Nestle SA 139/2 and S.M. Perold 3534, 3539-3541) have
elaters with well-formed spirals, but have been referred here
because the spores and plants are closely similar.
The strong aromatic smell referred to by Arnell was
not observed. Arnell (1952) stated that the spores of F.
capensis and F. pusilla had the same appearance, but he
distinguished F capensis from the latter because it was
dioicous and had large bracts subtending the antheridia in
the male plants. Initially Arnell (1953) thought that F
pusilla did not grow in South Africa, hut in his Hepaticae
of South Africa (Arnell 1963) he included it. Its presence
here still needs to be confirmed. Earlier reports of it
(Lehmann 1829; Gottsche et al. 1846; Sim 1926) are most
probably based on misidentifications. Best (1990) lists F
pusilla as present in Zimbabwe. Vina et al. (1979) re-
ported the presence of F capensis and E pusilla in
Rwanda and Burundi, but they doubted the determination
of F. capensis for a specimen from Rwanda. Examination
of the spores of De Sloover 18574 (BR) from Rwanda
shows it to belong to a different species. De Sloover
13.345 and 19.118 are sterile. F. capensis appears to be
confined to a relatively small area in the southeastern part
of Western Cape which has winter rainfall. Its spores ripen
in spring and summer.
2. Fossombronia densilamellata S.W. Arnell in Bo-
taniska Notiser 1952: 317 (1952); S.WArnell: 80 (1963).
Type: Western Cape, 3318 (Cape Town): Lion’s Head near
IGoofnek, (-CD), S.W. Arnell 295 (S, lecto.!, here desig-
nated; PRE, isolecto.).
Plants in dense colonies or overlying mats, pale green
to yellow-green, older leaves dying, turning yellow-brown
and translucent, lower part of stem occasionally almost
denuded of leaves; shoots smallish to medium-sized in
male plants, up to 12 mm long, 1.1 mm high, 2.5 mm
wide; female plants far more common and rather larger,
shoots sometimes simple, 9-14 mm long, 1.4-1 .7 mm
high, 1.6-3. 8 mm wide, at pseudoperianth up to 4.4 mm
wide, mostly bifurcate with terminal segments (Figure 6A)
closely to moderately divergent and of unequal length,
2-4- mm long. Stems prostrate, green, occasionally central
core purple, sometimes apically very shortly branched,
with dorsal bud-like layers of small leaves at tips, lateral
branches often developing from latero-ventral buds,
plano-convex in cross section, in male plants (Figure 51)
apically 210 pm (9 cell rows) high, 400 pm wide, basally
350 pm high, 350 pm wide, in female plants apically swol-
len (Figure 5J), 460 pm (± 16 cell rows) high, 700 pm
wide, gradually tapering toward base (Figure 5K), 280 pm
high, 430 pm wide. Rhizoids purple, 12.5-20.0 pm wide,
sometimes with flat tips. Leaves erect, imbricate, undulate
along upper margin, succubously inserted, markedly
decurrent on stem (Figure 6B), subquadrate to rectangular,
sometimes wider above than below, apex truncate or with
several low triangular or toothed projections, in male
plants (Figure 5A-C) 1125-1750 x 1125-1625 pm, in fe-
male plants mostly larger (Figure 5D-G), 1625-2750 pm
long, width above 1250-2125 pm, below 825-1250 pm;
margins with up to 13 slime papillae, 25.0 x 22.5 pm,
mostly at angulations and often more numerous on distal
(leading) edge (Figure 5C) than on proximal (trailing)
edge. Leaf cells (Figure 5H) above somewhat thicker-
walled than below, in male plants not appreciably different
from those of females, at upper margins rectangular
across, 27.5-35.0 x 32.5-57.5 pm, at lateral margins long-
rectangular, 52.5-75.0 X 20.0-22.5 pm, mostly longer at
proximal edge, up to 140.0 x 17.5 pm, upper laminal cells
4- or 5-sided, 45-50 x 45-50 pm, middle laminal cells
6- or 7- sided, walls bulging, 82.5-95.0 x 50.0-55.0 pm,
basal cells 100-125 x 25-60 pm. Oil bodies (Figure 5L)
very variable in number, in young leaves some cells with
8-10, in others much more numerous, round or bean-
shaped, up to 2 pm in diameter; chloroplasts numerous,
rounded, ± 5 pm in diameter.
Dioicous. Antheridia dorsal on stem, in 1 or 2 rows,
globose, ± 180 pm in diameter, each shielded by a bract
(Figures 5M-0; 6C), 300-450 x 320-400 pm, with sev-
eral projections, mostly topped by a mucilage papilla, cells
in body 4-7-sided, ± 62.5 x 25.0 pm. Archegonia (Figure
6D) in a row dorsally along stem, naked, sometimes sev-
eral per branch becoming fertilized, occasionally next to
each other or even surrounded by the same pseudoperi-
anth. Pseudoperianth (Figures 5P, Q; 6F) campanulate,
proximal to apex (Figure 6E), projecting ± 750 pm above
top of leaves, raised on a short stalk, ± 425 x 500-700
pm, then widely flaring above, 2250-2750 pm long, 2375
pm wide across mouth, its margin with toothed or angular
projections, 200-250 pm long, crowned with papillae.
Bothalia27,l (1997)
33
FIGURE 5. — Fossombronia densilamellata. A-C, male leaves; D-G, female leaves; H, detail of distal margin of male leaf; I, cross section of male stem;
J, cross section of apical part of female stem; K, cross section of basal part of female stem; L, median leaf cells with oil bodies and chloroplasts;
M-O, bracts; P, opened pseudoperianth; Q, pseudoperianth from side; R, cross section of seta; S, cells in capsule wall. A, B, E-G, I-K, M, O, P-S,
S.M. Perold 3349', C, H, N, Garside 6510', D, L, S.M. Perold 629. Scale bars; A-G, P, Q, 5(X) pm; H, R, 100 pm; 1-L, S, 50 pm; M-O, 250 pm.
34
Bothalia27,l (1997)
FIGURE 6. — Fossombronia densilamellata. A, thallus branches; B, apical leaves; C, male plant with rows of bracts; D, female plant with row of
archegonia; E, female plant with 2 pseudoperianths (see arrows); F, pseudoperianth. A-C, S.M. Perold 3346\ D-F, S.M. Perold 3349. A, D,
X 7; B, X 17; C, x 13; E, x 9; F, x 20.
± 22.5 X 17.5 |jm, sometimes with a winged outgrowth
at the side, ± 1925 |im long, 775 |im wide at apex; cells
comparable in shape and size to those of leaves. Capsules
globose, 700-875 pm in diameter, cells in inner layer of
bistratose wall (Figure 5S) irregularly shaped, 35.0-50.0
X 27.5-37.5 pm, each cell wall with 2 or 3 nodular and
sometimes semi-annular thickenings. Seta (Figure 5R)
5.0-9.5 mm long, 140-150 pm in diameter, up to 8 cells
across. Spores light brown or yellow-brown, hemispheri-
cal, 40-45 pm in diameter, including ‘spines’ projecting
± 2.5 pm at margin, these not connected by a wing; distal
face convex, with 12-16 thin, parallel, curving lamellae,
2.5 pm high (Figure 1C) running across (Figure 7A), cen-
tral ones usually longer, sometimes branched, lateral ones
(Figure 7D) shorter and ± radiating, separated by ± 2.5
pm, sometimes interconnected by slender threads (Figure
7B); proximal face (Figure 7E) mostly lacking a distinct
triradiate mark, rarely more pronounced, generally oma-
FIGURE 7. — Fossombronia densilamellata. Spores. A, B, distal face; C, detail of lamellae on distal face; D, side view of distal face; E, proximal
face; F, elater. A. Garside 65 W' B, Duthie CH 165P, C, D, Arnell & Garside 260; E, S.M. Perold 629; F, S.M. Perold 2355. A, x 7 1 9; B, E,
X 772; C, X 2795; D, x 865; F, x 805.
Bothalia27,l (1997)
A
35
FIGURE 8. — Fossombronia montaguensis. A-D, young apical leaves; E, F, K, older leaves; G-J, proximal leaves; L, detail of upper margin of leaf;
M, median leaf cells with oil bodies and chloroplasts mostly clumped together; N, cross section of stem; O. opened pseudoperianth; P,
pseudoperianth from side; Q, cells in capsule wall. A, F-J, L-Q, S.W. Amell 73 1\ B, E, K, 5. IV. Arnell 724\ C, D, SM. Perold 3454. Scale
bars: A-K, O, P, 500 pm; L, 100 pm; M, Q, 50 pm; N, 250 pm.
36
Bothalia27,l (1997)
FIGURE 9. — Fossombronia montaguensis. A, thallus branches; B, apical leaves; C, female plant with archegonia; D, female plant with
pseudoperianth near apex (see arrow); E, pseudoperianth from the side; F, pseudoperianth from above. A, B, 5. M Perold 3453\ C-F, S. W.
ArneU73l. A, x 12;B, x24; C, x 8; D, x 7; E x 9; F, x 11.
merited with coarse or slender pointed processes or short,
uneven ridges, around circumference up to ± 30 projecting
lamellar ‘spines’. Elaters (Figure 7F) light brown,
120-180 X 7.5-10.0 pm, tapering to tips, smooth, bispiral,
rarely trispiral, occasionally branched.
Fossombronia densilamellata is known only from
Western Cape and grows on partially shaded earth banks
at roadsides or on river banks. It has been collected at
Kloofnek, Round House, Lion’s Head, Newlands in Cape
Town and at Camps Bay, as well as at Franschhoek, Stel-
lenbosch and Algeria Forest (Figure 4). At PRE, the speci-
men Arnell 762 from Cogman’s Kloof, was labelled F.
densilamellata, but the packet contains no plant material,
only a slide preparation of the capsule wall without any
spores; the determination could thus not be verified and
Cogman’s Kloof cannot with certainty be included in its
distribution range.
FIGURE 10. — Fossombronia montaguensis. Spores. A, B, distal face; C, detail of lamellae and spore surface on distal face; D, side view of distal
faee; E, proximal face; F, elater. A-F, Arnell 731. A, x 745; B, x 699; C, x 1637; D, x 779; E, x 759; F, x 852.
Bothalia27,l (1997)
37
Fossombronia densilamellata is distinguised by its un-
dulating, decurrent leaves, rare and somewhat smaller
male plants with bracts shielding the antheridia and by
the spore ornamentation with 12-16 narrowly spaced,
thin, parallel lamellae on the distal face. The species fruits
in late winter and early spring and soon dies off, and only
the tuberous stem apices survive the dry summers. In
specimen SM. Perold 2356, from Algeria Forest, some of
the capsules bore spores with thick, granular ridges, not
thin lamellae; repeated samplings eventually turned up
spores with typical lamellae. Arnell had previously named
this species F. confertilamellata and his specimen 265,
held at S, still bears this epithet in his handwriting. Arnell
(1952) did not designate a holotype from the syntypes he
cited, Arnell 257, 265, 295, 762. The specimen Arnell 295
(S), is selected as lectotype because it closely matches the
protologue and a duplicate is held at PRE.
Arnell (1952, 1963) seems to have overestimated the
number of spines at the periphery of the spore. On SEM
micrographs they appear to be nearer to 30 than to 50.
Arnell (1963) refers to some similarity between the spores
of F. densilamellata and F. wondraczekii. In the latter they
frequently have papillae between the lamellae or some-
times the lamellae anastomose to form a few areolae in
the centre. Curiously, Arnell (1952) placed ‘E tiimida Sim’
in synonymy under F densilamellata. He must have meant
‘sensu Sim’ and he seems to have misinterpreted Sim’s
(1926) drawing and description of the spores of F. tiimida
Mitt. The drawing correctly illustrates the significant fea-
tures (although not well) and the description reads ‘lamel-
lae radiating from a few central areolae, and showing as
twenty-four to thirty spines on the margin’. Arnell (1963)
did not repeat these observations.
3. Fossombronia montaguensis S.W.Aniell in Bo-
taniska Notiser 1952: 316 (1952); S.W. Arnell: 83 (1963).
Type: Western Cape, 3320 (Montagu): Bath Kloof, (-CC),
S.W. Arnell 731 (S, lecto.!, here designated).
Plants in crowded overlying mats or more loosely ag-
gregated; leaves light green, becoming translucent or not,
and then mostly darker green, later on turning yellow at
margins or entirely so, sometimes juvenile leaves at apex
deep red; shoots medium-sized to large, up to 10 mm
long, 1. 1-2.0 mm high, 1. 8-3.5 mm wide, mostly repeat-
edly furcate, terminal segments (Figure 9A) 1-5 mm long,
moderately divergent. Stems prostrate, green or outer layer
distally purple, lateral branches occasionally developing
from latero-ventral buds, plano-convex in cross section
(Figure 8N), 280-380 pm high (12-14 cell rows),
490-750 pm wide, tapering toward base. Rhizoids purple,
10-25 pm wide. Leaves erect to spreading, frilly and
densely crowded apically (Figure 9B), becoming spaced
and lax proximally, succubous, subquadrate to long-rec-
tangular, sometimes irregularly shaped and wider above
than below, 1375-2500 x (600-) 1175-1950 pm, apical
leaves (Figure 8A-D) generally smaller than more proxi-
mal ones (Figure 8E-K), frequently shorter than wide,
900-1675 X 1250-1900 pm; margins with triangular or
irregular projections, with 6-16 slime papillae, ± 20 x 15
pm, often raised on a basal cell, 30-50 x 20-35 pm. Leaf
cells at upper margins (Figure 8L) quadrate, rectangular
across or irregular, 22.5-37.5 x 35.0-52.5 pm, at lateral
margins long-rectangular, 37.5-90.0 x 15.0-30.0 pm, up-
per laminal cells 5- or 6-sided, 32.5-45.0 x 32.5-55.0 pm,
middle laminal cells 6-sided (Figure 8M), 45.0-125.0 x
25.0-62.5 pm, basal cells 50.0-155.0 x 37.5-75.0 pm. Oil
bodies and chloroplasts were clumped together and could
not be studied adequately in the available material.
?Dioicous. No male plants seen. Archegonia in one or
two rows dorsally along stem (Figure 9C), naked, some-
times up to three per shoot becoming fertilized. Pseudo-
perianth (Figures 80, P; 9D-F) campanulate, ± same
height as leaves, sometimes slightly stalked, basally ± 875
pm wide, flaring widely above, up to 2575 pm long,
2375-3000 pm wide across cup-like mouth, its margin
with ± 30 triangular protrusions on a broad base, ± 160
pm long, and topped with a papilla, 17.5 x 17.5 pm, some-
times open at side, or where two component leaves are
joined, with a winged outgrowth; cells comparable in
shape and size to those of leaves. Capsules globose or
slightly flattened at the poles, 775-1050 pm in diameter,
cells in inner layer of bistratose wall (Figure 8Q) irregu-
larly shaped, 40.0-60.0 x 32.5-37.5 pm, each cell wall
with 1-3 nodular and sometimes semi-annular thicken-
ings. Seta 6.5-7. 5 mm long, 200-275 pm in diameter.
Spores brown, hemispherical, 40.0-47.5 pm in diameter,
including lamellae projecting ± 2.5 pm at margin, not
joined by a wing; distal face (Figure lOA-D) convex, with
up to 10 irregularly branched, long or short, sinuous la-
mellae, some breaking up into spines, others intercon-
nected by fine ridges running across, sometimes forming
incomplete areolae, ±5x5 pm; proximal face (Figure
lOE) lacking a distinct triradiate mark, ornamented with
low, irregular, rather short, branched ridges and with ± 27
irregularly shaped, variously sized, blunt, spine-like papil-
lae projecting at circumference. Elaters (Figure lOF) yel-
low-brown, 137.5-175 pm long, ± 7.5 pm wide in centre,
tips looped, ± 5 pm wide, smooth, bispiral throughout or
trispiral in centre.
Fossombronia montaguensis is most frequently found
on rather dryish soil banks next to footpaths in Western
Cape at Bath Kloof and Cogman’s Kloof, as well as at
Genadendal (Figure 4), where its growth is stunted and
far less luxurious than that of the lectotype specimen, S. W.
Arnell 731 (S), which must have grown in shady, damper
conditions, close to water. In the specimen S.W. Arnell
724 (S), both forms are represented: the proximal leaves
are large, lax and translucent, whereas the distal leaves
are smaller, firm and green, often partly stained with red.
Arnell’s (1952, 1963) measurements of the spores, 30-32
pm and 30-34 pm respectively, are rather less than mine.
Unfortunately my own collections of F. montaguensis
from Bath Kloof, S.M. Perold 3453 and 3454 p.p., are
sterile.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I wish to sincerely thank my colleagues at NBI, par-
ticularly Ms M. Koekemoer and Mrs C. Bredenkamp for
their kind assistance with fieldwork; also the curators of
BOL, BR, G and S as well as Dr Liibenau-Nestle for the
loan of specimens. My thanks to Ms G. Condy for the
drawings, Mrs A. Romanowsky for developing and print-
ing many photographs and Mrs J. Veldman for her part
in typing the manuscript.
38
Bothalia27,l (1997)
REFERENCES
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
ARNELL, S.W. 1952. Hepaticae collected in South and West Africa
(1951). New and little known species. Botaniska Notiser 1952:
307-329.
ARNELL, S.W. 1953. Notes on South African Hepaticae. Extrait de la
Revue Bryologique et Lidienologique 22, fasc. 1, 2.
ARNELL, S.W. 1963. Hepaticae of South Africa. Swedish Natural Sci-
ence Council, Stockholm.
BEST, E.B. 1990. The Bryophyta of Zimbabwe — an annotated checklist.
Kirkia 13:293-318.
GOTTSCHE, C.M., LINDENBERG, J.B.G. & NEES AB ESENBECK,
C.G. 1844—1847. Synopsis hepaticarum. Hamburg, Meissner.
LEHMANN, J.G.C. 1829. Hepaticarum capensium a C.F. Ecklon. Lin-
naea4: 351-31
PEROLD, S.M. in press. Studies in the liverwort genus Fossombronia
(Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 4. A re-examination of F.
crispa, F. leucoxantha and F. tumida. Bothalia.
PIIPPO, S. 1991. Bryophyte flora of the Huon Peninsula, Papua New
Guinea. XXXIX. Acta Botanica Fennica 143: 1-22.
SCHUSTER, R.M. 1992. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of North
America. Vol. 5. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago.
SCOTT, G.A.M. & PIKE, D.C. 1987. The Fossombronia foveolata com-
plex. Lituibergia 13: 79-84.
SCOTT, G.A.M. & PIKE, D.C. 1988. Revisionary notes on Fossom-
bronia. The Bryologist 91: 193-201.
SfM, T.R. 1926. The Bryophyta of South Africa. Transactions of the
Royal Society of South Africa 15: 1^75. Cape Town.
VANA, J., P(DCS, T. & DE SLOOVER, J.L. 1979. Hepatiques d’ Afrique
tropicale. Lejeunia 98: 1-23.
Held at PRE, unless otherwise indicated. Bracketed
numbers after collectors’ name and number refer to the
species in the text in alphabetical order, namely: F. capen-
sis (1); F. dens Hamel lata (2) and F. montaguensis (3).
S.W. Amell 265 (2) S; 275, 295 (2) S (lectotype), BOL (isolectotype);
724 (3) S; 731 (3) S (lectotype); 785 (3) PRE, S; 1376 (1) S (holotype),
BOL (isotype); 1470 (1) PRE, S; 1474 (1) BOL; 1477 (1) G; 1528, 1555
(1) BOL; 1678 (1) S; 1694 (1) BOL; 1715, 1716 (1) S; 1756 (1) BOL;
1757 (1) S; 1783 (1); 1851 (1) S. 5.W Amell & Garside 215 (2) BOL,
S; 259 (2) BOL; 260 (2).
Cholnoky 388 (1) S.
Duthie CH 1651 (2).
Ecklon 7691 (2) W.
Garside 6226, 6456, 6489, 6575, 6586 (2) BOL.
Koekemoer 998 (1).
Lubenau-Nestle SA 139/2 (1) pte.herb.
S.M. Perold 629 (2); 919 (1); 2355, 2356 (2); 3343, 3346, 3347, 3349
(2) ; 3453, 3454 pp. (3); 3492, 3494, 3497, 3498 (1); 3534, 3539,
3540-3541 (1).
S. Russell 2530 (1).
Van Zanten et al 7609809 pp. (2).
Bothalia 27,1: 39-42 (1997)
Studies in the liverwort genus Fossombronia (Metzgeriales) from southern
Africa. 3. An amendment to F. spinifoUa
S.M. PEROLD*
Keywords: Fossombronia, F. spinifoUa, Hepaticae, Metzgeriales, southern Africa
ABSTRACT
Fo.ssomhronia <;pinifolia was described by Stephan! (1900) from a specimen collected by Breutel at Genadendal (Gnaden-
thal) during his visit to the Cape, which lasted from November 1853 to April 1854 (Gunn & Codd 1981). This species was not
adequately described and illustrated by Stephani or by subsequent workers. Moreover, Scott & Pike (1987) misapplied the
epithet, F .spinifoUa, to specimens Amell had identified as F. leucoxantha, because they (Scott & Pike 1988) overlooked a
capsule with ripe spores in the type specimen. An attempt is hereby made to describe and illustrate this species in greater detail
in order to prevent more confusion in future.
Fossombronia spinifoUa Steph. in Species hepati-
carum 1; 389 (1900); Sim: 36 (1926); S.W.Amell: 84
(1963). Type: Africa Australis, Gnadenthal, leg. Breutel
s.n. G 22186, ex herb. K. Miiller Halensis (holo.!).
Plants in dense, overlying mats, green to dark green,
leaf margins occasionally yellowed or those of proximal
ones tinged with red to purple, rather small and slender;
shoots mostly simple, 3.0-7.0 mm long, 1.0-1 .2 mm high,
1. 7-2.5 mm wide, generally arising from fleshy, tuberous
apices (Figure 2A) and laterally from sides of older,
mostly leafless stems of various length (Figure 2B), that
taper proximally to thin, narrow bases. Stems bearing
leaves prostrate, these in turn tapering distally, mostly
plano-convex in cross section, in male plants at apex (Fig-
ure IM) ± 170 pm (10 cell rows) high, ± 210 pm wide,
at base (Figure IN) 230-240 pm (10 cell rows) high, ±
250 pm wide; in female plants at apex (Figure 10)
230-240 pm (12 cell rows) high, up to 380 pm wide, at
base (Figure IP) ± 360 pm (14 cell rows) high, ± 500
pm wide. Rhizoids purple, 12.5-22.5 pm wide, absent
from shoot apices. Leaves in male plants (Figure lA-E)
closely spaced, but rarely overlapping, spreading, suc-
cubously inserted on stem, oblong to irregularly shaped,
700-1175 X 500-1500 pm, sometimes narrower below,
upper margin mostly markedly dentate, with up to 10
teeth, these occasionally expanded into 1 or 2 triangular
lobes; in female plants, leaves (Figure IF-J) spreading to
suberect, overlapping (Figure 2E), frequently ‘ruched’ above,
very obliquely succubously inserted, leaving stem exposed,
shape irregular, as long as wide, 875-1000 x 800-1075 pm,
but sometimes shorter than wide, 1050-1200 x 1300-1625
pm, upper margin (Figure IK) dentate but often less pro-
nouncedly so than in male leaves, more often with Piangular
lobes. Leaf cells not appreciably different in male and female
plants, thin-walled, at margins subquadrate to rectangular
across, 20.0-35.0 x 32.5-57.5 pm, in male plants teeth
112.5-270.0 pm long, composed of an apical slime papilla,
± 12.5 X 12.5 pm, followed below by 1-3 single, long-rec-
tangular cells arranged end to end, 27.5-50.0 x 17.5^0.0
pm, gradually broadening to base, usually with 2 or 3 (oc-
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XlOl, Pretoria 0001.
MS. received: 1997-01-10.
casionally more) cells alongside each other, margins in
female plants with up to 12 well-spaced papillae, at lower
lateral margins cells long-rectangular, 42.5-50.0 x
17.5- 25.0 pm, upper laminal cells 5- or 6-sided, 30.0-37.5
X 32.5-40.0 pm, middle laminal cells 47.5-52.5 x
32.5- 37.5 pm, basal cells 50.0-62.5 x 40.0-50.0 pm. Oil
bodies absent from most cells; chloroplasts clumped to-
gether along cell walls, ± 5 pm in diameter (Figure IF).
Dioicous. Antheridia dorsal on stem (Figure 2C, D),
in a row, short-stalked, globose, ± 280 pm in diameter,
each shielded by a perigonial bract (Figure IQ-T),
300-^50 X 200-400 pm, margins with 1 or 2 (3) teeth
and 2-5 papillae, cells in interior 5- or 6-sided, 52.5-75.0
X 27.5-37.5 pm. Archegonia in a well-spaced row along
stem (Figure 2F), ± 280 pm long. Pseiidoperianth (Figure
lU, V) turbinate, near stem apex, mostly projecting some-
what above leaves, from narrow base flaring widely
above, ± 1625 pm long, 1500 pm wide across mouth,
margin with several very long teeth, 7-12 cells or up to
385 pm long, consisting of an apical papilla followed be-
low by 4 single, long-rectangular cells, arranged end-to-
end and then basally by 3-5 cells in pairs, the rest of the
cells comparable in shape and size to those of leaves.
Capsule globose, diameter could not be measured as it
was no longer intact, wall bistratose, cells in inner layer
(Figure IW) irregularly shaped, 35.0-42.5 x 20.0-30.0
pm, each cell wall with 1 or 2 yellow or brown nodular
and sometimes semi-annular thickenings. Seta 1.4-3. 5
mm long, ± 100 pm in diameter. Spores yellow-brown,
hemispherical, 36.0-45.0 pm in diameter, including spines
projecting around periphery; distal face convex, with 6 or
7 short irregular ridges ± 5 pm apart and sometimes
branched (Figure 3B, C), sides of ridges and surface be-
tween them with fine cross striations and granules (Figure
3D), papillae occasionally interspersed in between (Figure
3A); proximal face (Figure 3E) lacking triradiate mark,
flat to slightly concave, covered with numerous irregular
papillae, around spore periphery up to 25 projecting,
‘spines’, some conical, others truncate. Elaters (Figure 3F)
light brown, 105.0-150.0 x 7.5 pm, tapering to looped
tips, 3-5 pm wide, some completely bispiral, others partly
bi- and trispiral.
40
Bothalia27,l (1997)
FIGURE I . — Fossomhronia spimfolia. A-E, male leaves; F-J, female leaves; K, detail of leaf margin of female leaf; L, median leaf cells with remains
of oil bodies (solid lines) and chloroplasts (dotted lines); M, cross section of male stem apex; N, cross section of male stem base; O, cross
section of female stem apex; P, cross section of female stem base; Q-T, bracts; U, opened pseudoperianth; V, pseudoperianth from side;
cells in capsule wall. A, F-l, U-W, Breutel s.n. G 22I86\ B-E, J-T, Breutel s.n. (W). Scale bars: A-J, U, V, 500 pm; M-T, 250 pm; K.
W, 50 pm.
r ^
Bothalia27,l (1997)
41
FIGURE 2. — Fossombronia spinifolia. A, male branch which arose from apex of older stem; B, two branches arising from side of older, mostly
leafless stem; C, D, close view of antheridia and bracts; E, F, larger female branches with suberect, overlapping leaves and archegonia along
stem. A-F, Brenre/im. (W). A, X 13.5; B,x 15.4; C, D, x 24.3; E, x 18.2; F,x 14.5.
Fossombronia spinifolia is known only from Genaden-
dal, in Western Cape (Figure 4), where it was collected
by Breutel, probably in November or early December
1853, at the start of his visit to the Cape, which included
various halts along the way, ending at Hankey in the East-
ern Cape (Gunn & Codd 1981). The holotype specimen,
Breutel s.n. G 22186, consists of a few fragments, which
were originally housed in Muller’s herbarium and upon
his death in 1899, were acquired by Stephani. The packet
in G contains Stephani ’s well-preserved preparations of
several leaves, leaved branches and pseudoperianths,
which I measured and photographed. The leones No.
003053 (Stephani 1985) illustrate, however, only a single
dentate leaf, a spore with numerous spines around the cir-
cumference and an elater. One of the fragments of the
type specimen contains a single antheridium, 2 fragments
have immature capsules and another consists of a branch
with a pseudoperianth containing a broken capsule with
FIGURE 3. — Fossombronia spinifolia. Spores. A, B, distal face; C, side view of distal face; D, detail of lamellae at margin of distal face; E, proximal
face; F, elaters. A-F, Breutel s.n. G 22186. A, x 870; B, x 987; C, x 940; D, x 2434; E, x 856; F, x 866.
42
Bothalia27,l (1997)
mature spores. The spores were overlooked by Scott &
Pike (1988) and they (Scott & Pike 1987) had previously
misapplied the epithet F. spinifolia to specimens Amell
had identified as F. leucoxantha (Perold 1997 in press).
Sim (1926) reports F. spinifolia from Jonker’s Hoek, Stel-
lenbosch, Genadendal and other southwestern localities.
The Jonker’s Hoek specimen has not been seen, but the
two Stellenbosch specimens, H.A. Wager 34 (CH1650)
and Duthie 3 (CHI 651), are held at PRE. They have, how-
ever, been misidentified. Another Breutel s.n. specimen
from Genadendal is on loan to PRE from W. It had been
determined as F pusilla, but there is no doubt that it is
F spinifolia, although unfortunately it lacks pseudoperi-
anths and spores. The specimen is mixed with a fragment
of another Fossombronia species; it has pseudoperianths
with a few low spines at the margin and spores unlike
those of F spinifolia. The material of F. spinifolia from
W comprises numerous specimens, but the leaf cells are
rather less well preserved than those in Stephani’s prepa-
rations. There are several male plants with mature
antheridia and a few female plants with archegonia only.
Preparations from this specimen were also measured and
photographed by EM as well as SEM.
In an attempt to collect fresh material of F spinifolia,
I paid a brief visit to Genadendal in October 1995, but
failed to find any. The streambanks, which are the most
likely site where the species would be found (the exact
locality was not stated on the label), are much disturbed
and there has also been considerable infestation by alien
plants.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
Breutel s.n. G22186 (holo.!) ex herb. K. Miiller Halen-
sis; W s.n.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I wish to sincerely thank Mrs Diana Harvey, honorary
horticulturalist at Genadendal, for her hospitality and as-
sistance with fieldwork; also Mrs C. Bredenkamp, assis-
tant curator, National Botanical Institute, for all her help
and support. The curators of G and W are warmly thanked
for the loan of specimens and I extend my sincere thanks
to Ms G. Condy for the drawings, Mrs A. Romanowski
for developing and printing the photographs and to Ms D.
Maree for typing the manuscript.
REFERENCES
ARNELL, S.W. 1963. Hepaticae of South Africa. Swedish Natural Sci-
ence Council, Stockholm.
GUNN, M. & CODD, L.E. 1981. Botanical exploration of southern
Africa. Balkema, Cape Town.
PEROLD, S.M. 1997 in press. Studies in the liverwort genus Fossom-
bronia (Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 4. A re-examination
of F. crispa, F. leucoxantha and F. tumida. Bothalia.
SCOTT, G.A.M. & PIKE, D.C. 1987. Studies on Fossombronia in Aus-
tralia 3. Taxonomic and nomenclatural problems. Journal of the
Hattori Botanical Laboratory 63: 99-105.
SCOTT, G.A.M. & PIKE, D.C. 1988. Revisionary notes on Fossom-
bronia. The Bryologist 91 : 193-201 .
SIM, TR. 1926. The Bryophyta of South Africa. Transactions of the
Royal Society of South Africa 15: 1-475. Cape Town.
STEPHANI, F. 1900. Species hepaticarum Vol. 1. Geneva.
STEPHANI, F. 1985. kones hepaticarum, microfiche. Inter Documenta-
tion Company bv, Leiden.
Bothalia 27,1; 43-56 (1997)
Notes on African plants
VARIOUS AUTHORS
FABACEAE
A SURVEY OF ANTIPODALS IN THE GAMETOPHYTE OF THE TRIBES PODALYRIEAE AND LIPARIEAE
Antipodal cells in the female gametophyte of the
Eabaceae are variable (Prakash 1987). In the Mimosoideae
and Caesalpinioideae, antipodals tend to persist at least
until fertilization, whereas they are mostly ephemeral in
the Papilionoideae (George et al. 1979; Prakash 1987).
The variation found in papilionoid antipodals up to 1990,
is summarized by Cameron & Prakash (1990, 1994).
In a detailed study of antipodal behaviour in the Aus-
tralian Bossiaeeae and Mirbelieae, Cameron & Prakash
(1990, 1994) established that antipodals are of consider-
able taxonomic value at the tribal level. They found giant
antipodals in the gametophytes of some genera of the
tribes, and ephemeral or no antipodals in the remaining
genera. These results evidently supported tribal rearrange-
ments proposed earlier by Crisp & Weston (1987).
Relationships amongst the genera of the tribes Poda-
lyrieae and Liparieae have recently been investigated
(Schutte 1995; Van Wyk & Schutte 1995; Schutte & Van
Wyk 1997a). The study showed that the two tribes are
monophyletic, but that the genus Hypocalyptus is incon-
gruous. In view of these results and suggestions by Crisp
& Weston (1987), that the Australian tribes may be closely
related to the Podalyrieae and Liparieae, it was decided
to examine the antipodals of the two tribes as an additional
character. The results are presented and discussed here.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
At least one species of each genus of the Podalyrieae
and Liparieae sensu Polhill (1976, 1981a, b) was included
in the study. Voucher specimens of the material examined
are listed in Table 1.
Buds (just prior to anthesis) were fixed in an ethyl
alcohol-water-glycerol (70:29:1, v/v) mixture. Ovules
were dissected from the buds and serially dehydrated and
embedded in glycol methacrylate (GMA) according to the
method of Eeder & O’Brien (1968). These were sectioned
with an ultramicrotome, stained in Toluidine Blue and
mounted in Eukitt.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
From the results summarized in Table 1 , it is clear that
antipodal cells are present in both tribes. The antipodals
are prominent and persistent at least until anthesis in Li-
paria, Xiphotheca, Amphithalea, Coelidium and the gen-
era of the Podalyrieae (Figure 1). Cyclopia in particular,
has large and deeply stained nuclei in the cells (Figure
1C). Hypocalyptus, however, has inconspicuous and
ephemeral antipodal cells (Figure IF), which degenerate be-
fore anthesis (several ovules had to be sectioned before the
antipodals could be traced).
Unlike the Bossiaeeae and Mirbelieae, antipodals are
neither gigantic nor totally absent in the Podalyrieae and
Liparieae. In the latter two tribes they are less than 0.25
times the length of the gametophyte cavity (Figure 1),
compared with the Australian genera, where they are
more than 0.5 times the length of the gametophyte cavity
(see figures in Cameron & Prakash 1990, 1994). These
giant antipodals persist until well after fertilization. A di-
rect link between the Australian and South African tribes
therefore seems unlikely.
The presence of persistent antipodals in the female game-
tophyte of the Podalyrieae and Liparieae (excluding Hypo-
TABLE 1. — ^List of species examined and the characteristics of the antipodal cells. Voucher specimens are housed in JRAU
44
Bothalia 27,1 (1997)
FIGURE 1 . — Female gametophytes of some species of Podalyrieae and Liparieae, showing the antipodals (indicated with arrows). A, Stirtonanthus
taylorianus', B, Virgilia oroboides subsp. oroboides; C, Cyclopia sessiliflora\ D, Amphithalea tomentosa\ E, Coelidium vlokii\ F, Hypocalyptus
sophoroides. Scale bar; 50 pm.
calyptus ) is a synapomorphy for the two tribes. In the tribe
Crotalarieae, which is the sister group of the Podalyrieae and
Liparieae (Schutte & Van Wyk 1997a), antipodals are
ephemeral fNarang 1978; Schutte unpubl.). The proposed
amalgamation of the two tribes is therefore clearly sup-
ported by the antipodal characteristics. Other characters,
such as the strongly reduced bracteoles and the accumu-
lation of esters of anthocyanins in the pink, purple or
orange-flowered species, also support this notion (Schutte
& Van Wyk 1997a).
Hypocalyptus not only deviates from the other genera
in its antipodal characteristics, but also in at least eight
other significant morphological, cytological and chemical
characters (Schutte & Van Wyk 1997b). This undoubtedly
indicates that the genus does not fit in the Podalyrieae
sensii lato. The tribal position of Hypocalyptus within the
Papilionoideae will be re-assessed and discussed elsewhere
(Schutte & Van Wyk 1997b).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am very grateful to Dr PM. Tilney (Department of Bot-
any, RAU) for assisting with the preparation of the micro-
scope slides and to Prof. B.-E. van Wyk (Department of
Botany, RAU) for commenting on an earlier draft of the
manuscript. Financial support from the Rand Afrikaans Uni-
versity is acknowledged.
REFERENCES
CAMERON, B.G. & PRAKASH, N. 1990. Occurrence of giant antipo-
dals in the female gametophyte of Australian Bossiaeeae, In-
Bothalia27,l (1997)
45
digofereae and Mirbelieae (Leguminosae). Australian Journal of
Botany 38: 395-401.
CAMERON, B.G. & PRAKASH, N. 1994. Variations of the megagame-
tophyte in the Papilionoideae. In l.K. Ferguson & S. Tucker,
Advances in legume systematics 6: 97-115. Royal Botanic Gar-
dens, Kew.
CRISP, M.D. & WESTON, PH. 1987. Cladistics and legume systematics,
with an analysis of the Bossiaeeae, Brongniartieae and Mirbelieae
(Papilionoideae, Leguminosae). In C.H. Stirton, Advances in leg-
ume systematics 3: 65-130. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
FEDER, N. & O’BRIEN, TP. 1968. Plant microtechnique: some princi-
ples and new methods. American Journal of Botany 55: 123-142.
GEORGE, G.P., GEORGE, R.A. & HERR, J.M. 1979. A comparative study
of ovule and megagametophyte development in field-grown and
greenhouse -grown plants of Glycine max and Phaseolus aureus
(Papilionaceae). American Journal of Botany 66: 1033-1043.
NARANG, A.K. 1978. Contribution to the embryology of Crotalaria
species. Journal of the Indian Botanical Society 57: 322-331.
POLHILL, R.M. 1976. Genisteae (Adans.) Benth. and related tribes
(Leguminosae). Botanical Systematics 1: 143-368.
POLHILL, R.M. 1981a. Tribe 27. Podalyrieae Benth. In R.M. Polhill &
P.H. Raven, Advances in legume systematics 1: 396, 397. Royal
Botanic Gardens, Kew.
POLHILL, R.M, 1981b. Tribe 28. Liparieae (Benth.) Hutch. In R.M.
Polhill 8l P.H. Raven, Advances in legume systematics 1: 398.
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
PRAKASH, N. 1987. Embryology of the Leguminosae. In C.H. Stirton,
Advances in legume systematics 3: 241-278. Royal Botanic Gar-
dens, Kew.
SCHUTTE, A.L. 1995. A taxonomic study of the tribes Podalyrieae and
Liparieae (Fabaceae). Ph.D. thesis, Rand Afrikaans University,
Johannesburg.
SCHUTTE, A.L. & VAN WYK, B.-E. 1997a. Evolutionary relationships
in the Podalyrieae and Liparieae based on morphological, cyto-
logical and chemical evidence. Plant Systematics & Evolution. In
press.
SCHUTTE, A.L. & VAN WYK, B.-E. 1997b. The tribal position of
Hypocalyptus Thunb. (Fabaceae). Novon (submitted).
VAN WYK, B.-E. & SCHUTTE, A.L. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships
in the Podalyrieae, Liparieae and Crotalarieae. In M.D. Crisp &
J.J. Doyle, Advances in legume systematics 7: 283-308. Royal
Botanic Gardens, Kew.
A.L. SCHUTTE*
* Department of Botany, Rand Afrikaans University, P.O. Box 524, 2006
Auckland Park, Johannesburg. Present address: Compton Herbarium,
National Botanical Institute, Kirstenbosch, Private Bag X7, 7735 Clare-
mont, Cape Town.
MS. received: 1996-08-08.
THYMELAEACEAE
NEW COMBINATIONS IN LACHNAEA
The genus Cryptadenia Meisn. comprising five spe-
cies, was established by Meisner in 1840 and based on
Drege’s collections (Meisner 1840). In De Candolle’s
Prodromus the same five species were recognized by
Meisner (1857). Wright (1915) in his treatment of the
genus recognized four of these species, reduced one to
synonymy and described a new species. Beyers & Van
der Walt (1995) concluded that Cryptadenia and Lach-
tiaea L. are congeneric and that Cryptadenia should be
included within Lachnaea. In accepting these findings,
the necessary nomen- clatural changes are made to the
five species which are currently recognized (Van Wyk
1993) following Wright’s treatment of the genus.
Lachnaea filicaulis (Meisn.) Beyers comb. nov.
Cryptadenia filicaulis Meisn.: 407 (1840); Meisn.: 574 (1857); C.H.Wright:
17 (1915).
Lachnaea grandiflora (Lf.) Baill: 109, t. 77 (1880).
Passerina grandiflora L.f.: 226 (1782). Cryptadenia grandiflora (L.f.)
Meisn.: 405 (1840); Meisn.: 573 (1857); C.H.Wright: 16 (1915).
Cryptadenia breviflora Meisn.: 406 (1840); Meisn.: 573 (1857);
C.H.Wright: 17 (1915). Type: Ecklon 360 (?holo, K!; NBG!, iso.).
Lachnaea laxa (C.H.Wright) Beyers comb. nov.
Cryptadenia laxa C.H.Wright: 17 (1915).
Lachnaea uniflora (L.) Beyers comb. nov.
Passerina uniflora L.: 560 (1753). Cryptadenia uniflora (L.) Meisn.:
406 (1840); Meisn.: 573 (1857); C.H.Wright: 16 (1915).
REFERENCES
BAILLON, H. 1 880. The natural history of plants 6. Reeve, London.
BEYERS, J.B.P & VAN DER WALT, J.J.A. 1995. The generic delimi-
tation of Lachnaea and Cryptadenia (Thymelaeaceae). Bothalia
25: 65-85.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum, edn 1. Salvius, Stockholm.
LINNAEUS, C. (fil). 1782. Supplementum plantarum. Braunschweig.
MEISNER, C.F. 1840, Synopsis Thymelaearum, Polygonearum et Bego-
niarum africae australis, imprimus a cl. J.J. Drege lectarum. Lin-
naea 14: 385-516.
MEISNER, C.F. 1857. Thymelaeaceae. In A.P. de Candolle, Prodromus
systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 14: 573-580. Victoris Masson,
Paris.
VAN WYK, C.M. 1993. Thymelaeaceae. In T.H. Arnold & B.C. de Wet,
Plants of southern Africa: names and distribution. Memoirs of the
Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 62: 515-519.
WRIGHT, C.H. 1915. Thymelaeaceae. Elora capensis 5,2 part 1: 1-80.
Reeve, London.
J.B.P. BEYERS*
* Compton Herbarium, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X7,
Claremont 7735, Cape Town.
MS. received: 1996-08-28.
RUBIACEAE
A NEW SPECIES OF VANGUERIA FROM THE SOUTPANSBERG
Vangueria soutpansbergensis N. Hahn sp. nov. Vf TYPE. — Northern Province, Soutpansberg, 2230
parvifoliae Sond. [= Tapiphyllum parvifolium (Sond.) (Messina), Farm Studholme, 22° 56’ 52.4” South and
Robyns ex Good] affinis sed foliiis glabratis. Figure 2. 30° 01’18.8” East (Cape Mapping Datum), (-CC), 1 440
46
Bothalia 27,1 (1997)
m, 28-11-1995, (in flower), N. Hahn 1112 (PRU, holo.; K,
PRE, iso.).
A deciduous shrub or small tree up to 2.5 m high,
growing in mixed woodlands in soils derived from Sout-
pansberg Group quartzites. Bark dark brown to grey-
brown. Branches glabrous. Leaves opposite or fascicled,
if fascicled usually on dwarf lateral branches; lamina el-
liptic to almost circular, (13.6-)16.2-25.2(-26.7) x
(9-)12.9-18.9(-22.8) mm; base obtuse to rounded; apex
obtuse to rounded; glabrous above and below, seldom very
sparsely hairy when young, dark green above, paler be-
low; petiole short, (0.5-)l.l-2.4(-2.7) mm long, glabrous
to rarely sparsely hairy; margins entire; lateral veins 3-5,
opposite to alternate near the leaf base, otherwise alternate.
Inflorescence: dense 2-15-flowered fascicles or peduncu-
late cymes. Peduncle and pedicel glabrous or very
sparsely hairy, pedicel (1.5-)2.1-2.9(-3.7) mm long.
Flowers 5-merous, greenish to lime-green. Calyx lobes
(1.2-)1.7-1.9(-2.6) X (1-)1.3-1.4(-1.9) nun, glabrous to
sparsely hairy. Corolla glabrous to sparsely hairy on out-
side, with a distinct ring of reflexed hairs in throat; tube
(2.3-)2.5-2.7(-3.2) mm long, (2.1-) 2.5-2. 8(-3.4) mm
in diameter at mouth; lobes , -elliptic-oblong (2.9-)3.3-3.5
(-4.1) mm long, occasionally mucronate abaxially at
apex. Stamens inserted in corolla mouth. Anthers ex-
serted, (0.9-)1.3-1.4(-1.6) mm long. Style (3.1-)3.6-3.9
(^.6) mm long, glabrous, conversely curved so as to
touch throat of tube between two anthers. Disc
(1.8-)2.2-2.3(-2.8) mm in diameter, depressed or tumid.
Hypanthium ( 1 . 1-) 1 .6-1 .7(-2. 1 ) mm long. Fruit a
glabrous, subglobose drupe, length (15. 3-)17. 9-24.1
FIGURE 2. — Vangueria soutpansbergensis. A, flowering branch; B, opened corolla, showing hair fringes and position of anthers; C, flower with
tube removed, showing calyx, disc and conversely curved style; D, fruit seen from the base, showing the remains of the calyx ring; E, side
view of fruit; F, pyrene; G, cross section through pyrene, showing shape and position of embryo. Scale bars: A, B, ± 1 mm; C, ± 2 mm; D-G,
± 10 mm.
Bothalia27,l (1997)
47
(-27.5) mm, width (14.7-)17.5-25.9(-29.4) mm, breadth
(13.^)16.3-23.7(-27.2) mm; pedicel (0.5-)0.8-1.9 (-2.3)
mm long, with 1-4 pyrenes, edible, tasting similar to those
of V. infausta; seeds bean-shaped. Flowering period: No-
vember to December. Fruiting period: March to April.
Specimens examined
NORTHERN PROVINCE. — 2229 (Waterpoort): Muswiru, Schlesingers
sawmill, (-DC), G. Gerstner 5912 (K n.v., PRE); Farm Surprise, (-DC),
N. Hahn 454 (Herb. Sout.); Farm Uniondale, (-DC), N. Hahn 329 (PRU,
Herb. Sout.); Farm Clydesdale, (-DD), N. Hahn 613 (Herb. Sout ); Farm
Rushton, (-DD), N. Hahn 650 (Herb. Sout,); Farm Zwarthoek, (-DD), N.
Hahn 109 (PRU, Herb. Sout.). 2230 (Messina): Piesanghoek, (-AA), G.
Gerstner 5736 (PRE); Farm Studholme, (-AA), N. Hahn 1112 (K, PRE,
PRU, Herb. Sout ); N. Hahn 1164 (K, PRU, Heib. Sout.).
Habitat
The geographic distribution of this species correlates
with other endemic taxa of the Soutpansberg flora. A phy-
togeographical survey of the endemic flora of the Sout-
pansberg (Figure 3) being undertaken by the author has
shown that the endemic species of the Soutpansberg can
be divided into two broad groups according to their habi-
tat preferences, namely: 1, species occurring in a rela-
tively restricted area and displaying little variation in their
habitat preference; 2, species distributed over most of the
mountain range showing a relatively large habitat toler-
ance. Vangueria soutpansbergensis falls within the latter
group, occurring in a variety of habitats ranging from
mountain mistbelt to Androstachys woodland.
Generic disposition
Having studied all members of the genera Pachy-
stigma, Vangueria, Lagynias and Tapiphyllum in the con-
text of the Soutpansberg, I conclude that the flowering
structures and fruiting structures of Tapiphyllum parvifo-
lium are identical to those of Vangueria. Bridson (1996)
expressed doubt as to the generic dispensation of Tapi-
phyllum parvifolium as it was atypical of the genus in
many respects: ‘small leaves, few-flowered inflorescence,
larger glabrescent fruit and occurring outside the main dis-
tribution area of the rest of Tapiphyllum’. Tapiphyllum
parvifolium and V. .soutpansbergensis are without doubt
closely related. This supports the argument that they
should be placed under the genus Vangueria.
Key to genera of the tribe Vanguerieae in the
Soutpansberg region
la Calyx lobes short, linear or triangular, shorter than the corolla
tube Vangueria
lb Calyx lobes long and leafy, as long as or longer than the
corolla tube:
2a Calyx lobes spathulate; fruit narrowing towards apex . . Lagynias
2b Calyx lobes linear; fruit not narrowing towards apex . . Pachystigma
Specific disposition
The tribe Vanguerieae is notorious for its taxonomic
complexities. The genera are poorly defined, and at spe-
cific level, characters available for the separation of taxa
are very few and at best can be seen as very artificial.
The morphological differences between Vangueria sout-
pansbergensis and V. parvifolia are very slight and con-
cern mainly the degree of hairiness of various organs
(Table 2). V. soutpansbergensis is nevertheless recognized
at species level for the following reasons: a) other simi-
larly closely related species pairs are widely recognized
in Rubiaceae, for example, Vangueria infausta subsp. in-
fausta and V. cyanescens and Canthium mundianum and
Canthium gilfillanir, b) even though V. soutpansbergensis
and V. parvifolia are sympatric in some plaees no inter-
mediate forms have been found; c) V. soutpansbergensis
is endemic to the Soutpansberg, a region with a high oc-
currence of endemic plants and animals.
Vangueria soutpansbergensis is by no means a rare
plant, usually occurring within mixed woodlands, on
rocky slopes where it may be common. The species has
so far only been found growing on soils derived from
quartzite, an attribute shared with most endemic plant spe-
cies of this region.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I hereby would like to thank the National Botanical
Institute Pretoria for allowing me access to their library and
herbarium. I am grateful to Prof. Braam van Wyk (Cura-
tor, Schweickerdt Herbarium, University of Pretoria) for his
TABLE 2, — Summary of characters separating the two species of
Vangueria
48
Bothalia 27,1 (1997)
assistance and for allowing me access to that herbarium. I
would also like to thank Ms Diane Bridson for scmtinizing
the original manuscript and for her invaluable comments
given. Lastly I would like to thank Karen Marais for her
beautiful water colour plate accompanying this article.
REFERENCES
BRIDSON, D. 1996. The tropical African genus Ancylanthos (Rubiaceae-
Vanguerieae). Kew Bulletin 51: 343-352 .
COATES PALGRAVE, K. C. 1992. Trees of southern Africa. 2nd revised
edn, 6th impr. Struik Publishers, Cape Town.
DYER, R. A. 1975. The genera of southern African flowering plants Vol.
1 Dicotyledons. Department of Agricultural Technical Services,
Pretoria.
PHILLIPS, E. P. 1951.ThegeneraofSouth African flowering plants, 2nd
edn. Memoir of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 25.
N. HAHN*
* P. O. Box 1734, 0920 Louis Trichardt, South Africa.
MS. received: 1996-10-17.
ASTERACEAE
NEW COMBINATION IN DICOMA
In the course of extensive studies of herbarium material
of various genera of the tribes Mutisieae and Inuleae (As-
teraceae) from sub-Saharan Africa, we have noted new
localities and other data for species of Dicoma Cass. (Mu-
tisieae).
Dicoma membranacea S. Moore
Although D. membranacea S. Moore has been consid-
ered by various authors (Moore 1904; Wilson 1923;
Merxmiiller 1967) to be closely related to D. sessiliflora
Harv., nobody to date has questioned the species status of
this taxon; this may be because the currently accepted
distribution of D. membranacea (northwest Namibia and
southern Angola) (Figure 4) does not overlap either with
that of D. sessiliflora subsp. sessiliflora — Malawi, Tanza-
nia, Mozambique and parts of Zaire (Pope 1992) — or with
that of the recently described D. sessiliflora subsp. steno-
phylla Pope in West Africa (Pope 1991). However, we
have examined the material from Mozambique cited be-
low, and currently referred to subsp. sessiliflora, which is
morphologically indistinguishable from D. membranacea
from Angola and Namibia.
We found D. sessiliflora and D. membranacea to differ
only in length of stem (less than 150 mm tall in the latter).
Moore (1904) considered the presence of pedunculate ca-
pitula to be diagnostic for D. membranacea, but we have
examined specimens of this taxon in which the capitula
are sessile [Voucher: Angola, Rui Correia 2589 (LUAI)]
or subsessile [Vouchers: Angola, Borges 123 (LUAI);
Mozambique, Gomes e Sousa 2157 (COI)], and further-
more the capitula of D. sessiliflora are not always sessile.
Moore (1904) considered corolla size to discriminate be-
tween the two taxa, but the size cited by this author for
D. membranacea is the same as that given by Pope (1992)
for D. sessiliflora. Similarly, Moore (1904) stated that the
corolla lobes are the same length as the tube in D. mem-
branacea-, this is not the case in a number of specimens
examined by us in which the lobes are longer than the
tube [including those of Rui Correia 2589, Borges 123
and Giess 8969 (K) from Namibia]. In our opinion the
putatively distinguishing characters included in Pope’s
(1991) key to the section Pterocoma are, with the excep-
tion of length of stem (maximum 150 mm in D. mem-
branacea), likewise of limited value. This author cites
stem hairiness as a distinguishing character and states that
only the stems of D. sessiliflora can be glabrescent. We
have not been able to identify clear differences between
the two taxa in this respect, and have found specimens
of D. membranacea with glabrescent stems [Voucher: An-
gola, Borges 123 (LUAI)]. We did not find significant
differences with regard to length of leaves (more than 120
mm long in D. sessiliflora versus up to 100 mm long in
D. membranacea)-, indeed Moore (1904) described D.
membranacea as having leaves up to 140 mm long.
MOZAMBIQUE. — 1235: Inhambane, Massinga-Vilanculos, Govuru
River, 7-1938, Gomes e Sousa 2157 (COI, K, LISC). 2335: Niassa,
Administrative Post of Mujoco, 30-9-1948, Pedro & Pedrdgdo 5449
(LMA).
FIGURE 4. — Distribution of Dicoma sessiliflora subsp. sessiliflora var.
membranacea. Known distribution based on Moore (1904),
Merxmiiller (1967) and herbarium material: dotted area. New
localities: triangles.
Bothalia27,l (1997)
49
Since the morphological differences between these two
taxa are minimal, and since the range of D. membranacea
is not geographically continuous, we consider that this
taxon should be viewed as a variety of D. sessiliflora.
Dicoma sessiliflora Harv. subsp. sessiliflora var.
membranacea (S.Moore) S. Ortiz & Rodr.Oubina, comb,
et stat. nov.
D. membranacea S.Moore in Bulletin de I’Herbier Boissier, ser. II, 4:
1025 (1904).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Many thanks to the curators of herbaria from which
material has been loaned for the present study and to Guy
Norman for the English translation.
REFERENCES
MERXMULLER, H. 1967. Asteraceae. In H. Merxmiiller, Prodromus
einer Flora Sudwestafrikas 139: 1-185. Cramer, Lehre.
MOORE, S. 1904. Beitriige zur Kenntnis der Afrikanischen Flora. Com-
positae. Bulletin de I’Herbier Boissier, ser. 77, 4: 1011-1025.
POPE, G.V 1991. Notes on Dicoma Cass. (Compositae). Kew Bulletin
46: 699-709.
POPE, G.V. 1992. Flora zambesiaca, Vol. 6, Part I. Flora Zambesiaca
Managing Committee, London.
WILSON, F.C. 1923. Revision of the genus Dicoma. Bulletin of Miscel-
laneous Information, Kew 1923: 377-388.
S. ORTIZ*, J. RODRIGUEZ-OUBINA* and I. PULGAR*
*Laboratorio de Botanica, Facultade de Farmacia, Universidade de San-
tiago, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain.
MS. received: 1996-02-01.
VITACEAE
A NEW SPECIES OF RHOICISSUS FROM THE EASTERN CAPE
Rhoicissus kougabergensis Relief & Van Jaarsv.,
sp. nov., R. microphyllae (Turcz.) Gilg & M.Brandt et R.
laetantis Retief affinis, sed distributione et lamina folii
ambitu anguste obovata, non ovata vel elliptica (ut in R.
microphylla) nec elliptico-obovata (ut in R. laetanti) dif-
fert.
TYPE. — Eastern Cape, 3324 (Steytlerville): Kouga
Dam, NW of chalets, (-DA), Van Jaarsveld 13796 (PRE,
holo.; E, G, K, MO, NBG, iso.).
Spreading shrub with tendency to scramble, covered
with equally two-armed, unicellular hairs. Roots thick and
fleshy. Tendrils absent. Branches with leaves aligned on
one side; old bark greyish white, rough. Leaves simple,
petiolate; blade narrowly obovate, (22-)30-55(-65) x
(6-)10-22(-27) mm, entire, apex obtuse or slightly emar-
ginate, thick in texture, discolorous with lower surface
reddish brown, upper surface glaucous green or both sur-
faces more or less of the same colour, lower surface more
densely hairy; base of blade cuneate or asymmetric; young
leaves covered throughout with reddish brown hairs; older
leaves pale white or transparent on upper surface; petiole
2-4(-7) mm long; stipules present, soon deciduous. Inflo-
rescences leaf-opposed, ± condensed, reddish brown,
bracteate, thyrsoid cymes. Flowers regular, bisexual,
pedicellate, globose in bud; pedicels 0.5-1. 0 mm long.
Calyx 5-lobed, cup-shaped, ± 1 mm high; lobes broadly
ovate. Corolla: petals 5, ovate, 1. 5-2.0 mm long, greenish
yellow. Stamens 5, opposite petals, bending over gynoecium;
filaments 1 mm long; anthers dorsifixed. Disc entire with
ovary immersed in it. Style simple, entire; stigma inconspicu-
ous. Fruit a 1 -seeded berry, globose, 8-10 mm in diameter,
stalk ±1.5 mm long (Eigures 5 & 6).
The globose flower bud and the thick, entire disc of
Rhoicissus kougabergensis indicate that it belongs to the
genus Rhoicissus (Retief 1993). It is the fourth southern
African member of the genus with simple leaves. All other
known species have 3-or 5-foliolate leaves. R. kougaber-
gensis differs from R. microphylla in the outline of its
leaves which are narrowly obovate (Eigure 7A). Table 3
summarizes differences between the simple-leaved spe-
cies known from southern Africa. The other three species
with simple leaves can be distinguished as follows; 1, R.
microphylla has ovate to elliptic leaves (Figure 7B) and
equally two-armed, reddish brown, unicellular hairs (Fig-
ure 8), somewhat more slender than those of R. kou-
EIGURE 5. — Holotype of Rhoicissus kougabergensis. Van Jaarsveld
13796 (PRE).
50
Bothalia 27,1 (1997)
FIGURE 6. — Rhoicissus kougabergensis Relief & Van Jaarsv.: A, flower bud; B, upper surface of leaf; C, undersurface of leaf; D, stamen; E, stamen
bending over gynoecium; F, pollen grain, SEM micrographs from Van Jaarsveld 13796. A, x 169; B, x 53; C, x 53; D, x 40; E, x 1 8; F, x 1 540.
gabergensis, giving a rusty brown appearance to the spe-
cies. R. micwphylla occurs in the Queenstown-Cathcart
area, whereas R. kougabergensis is found only in the vi-
cinity of the Kouga Dam (Figure 9); 2, R. laetans, which
has elliptic, glabrous leaves, is endemic to the Blydepoort
Nature Reserve area in Mpumalanga (Figure 9); 3, R.
tomentosa (Lam.)Wild & R.B.Drumm. has shallowly
lobed, broadly transversely elliptic or reniform leaves and
is a high-climbing liane in contrast to R. kougabergensis,
a spreading shrub.
The pollen grains of R. kougabergensis are typically
isopolar and radially symmetrical. In polar view the grains
are triangular to circular; the mesocolpia are convex and
the equatorial view is elliptic. The colpi are long, narrow
and granular with pointed ends; the tectum is reticulate
with densely spaced lumina (Figure 6F).
Rhoicissus kougabergensis is endemic to the Kouga
Dam area (only locality known) within the Kouga-
Baviaanskloof Wilderness Area in the southern Eastern
Cape where it occurs on steep slopes (Figure 9). The vege-
tation in the region consists of subtropical thicket, domi-
nated by the spekboom, Portulacaria afra Jacq., with fyn-
bos on the upper slopes. The climate is hot in summer
and mild in winter. The rainfall varies between 300 and
400 mm annually and occurs in summer and winter, but
the winters tend to be drier. The terrain is rugged and the
acid, quartzitic, sandstone soils are poor in minerals. Ac-
cording to Archer & Van Wyk (1993), R. digitata (L.f.)
Gilg & M.Brandt, R. revoilii Planch, and R. tridentata
(L.f.) Wild & R.B.Drumm. subsp. tridentata occur in the
Kouga-Baviaanskloof Wilderness Area. R. kougabergensis
with simple leaves is easily distinguished from these spe-
cies which all have 3- or 5-foliolate leaves. R. kougaber-
gensis starts flowering ± in October.
The Kouga-Baviaanskloof Wilderness Area does not
appear to contain an exceptionally rich flora, nor is it very
rich in endemic species. The area is still undercollected
and future floristic surveys will undoubtedly add many
new records and even new taxa (Archer & Van Wyk
1993). Some endemic species occurring in the vicinity of
R. kougabergensis include two tree species, Sterculia al-
exandri Harv. and Atalaya capensis R.A.Dyer. Smaller en-
demic species include Aloe pictifolia D.S. Hardy, Gasteria
TABLE 3. — Southern African species of Rhoicissus with simple leaves
Bothalia27,l (1997)
51
FIGURE 7. — Characteristic leaf blade outlines
of: A, Rhoicissus kougabergensis', B, R.
microphylla, x 1 .
FIGURE 9. — Known distribution of Rhoicissus kougabergensis Retief
& Van Jaarsv., •; R. microphylla (Turcz.) Gilg & Brandt, A; R.
laetans Retief, ♦.
FIGURE 8. — SEM micrographs of upper surface of leaf with two-armed
hairs; A, Rhoicissus kougabergensis, x 234; B, R. microphylla, x 198.
glomerata Van Jaarsv. and G. ellaphieae Van Jaarsv., Cyr-
tanthus flammosus Snijman & Van Jaarsv. and C. labiatus
R. A. Dyer.
EASTERN CAPE. — 3324 (Steytlerville); Kouga Dam, sheer slope
above wall, (-DA), Van Jaarsveld 9902 (NBG, PRE); Kouga Dam, NW
of chalets, (DA), Van Jaarsveld 13796 (E, G, K, MO, NBG).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank Mr Rob Welsh for his help
in searching for fruits at the Kouga Dam.
REFERENCES
ARCHER, R. & VAN WYK, B. 1993. Checklist of the vascular plants of
the Kouga-Baviaanskloof Wilderness Area. Plantlife 9: 25-31.
RETIEF, E. 1993. A new species of Rhoicissus from the Transvaal.
Bothalia 23:231-237.
E. RETIEF* and E.J. VAN JAARSVELD**
*National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XlOl, Pretoria 0001.
** National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X7, Claremont 7735.
MS. received: 1996-05-10.
APIACEAE (UMBELLIFERAE)
A NEW NAME FOR A SOUTH AFRICAN PEUCEDANUM
Conservation of the name Peucedanum capense (Thunb.)
Sond. (1862) against P. capense (Eckl. & Zeyh.) D.Dietr.
(1840) was proposed some years ago (Burtt 1989; 1991: 271).
Under the Code then current this might have been a contentious
case, and the Committee for Spermatophyta therefore decided
to postpone its decision until after the Tokyo Congress,
when changes to that part of the Code were expected.
These were, indeed, made and the retention of
Peucedanum capense (Thunb.) Sond. has been approved by
the Committee [votes 12:0 — see Taxon 45: 671 (1996)].
52
Bothalia27,l (1997)
There remains the question of the correct name for
the rejected P. capense (Eckl. & Zeyh.) D.Dietr., which
is currently known as P. midtiradiatum Drude. That
name, however, is illegitimate. Under the Tokyo Code
it would be possible to propose P. midtiradiatum for
conservation, but P. multiradiatum is a much less com-
mon plant than P. capense (Thunb.) Sond. and I am not
alone in thinking that conservation in this case is un-
warranted. A change of name will cause only a tiny
ripple in South African plant nomenclature and a pro-
posal for conservation means further work for the Com-
mittee, further delay in a final decision, and no certainty
that conservation would eventually be granted. A simple
name change now will close the issue, and the follow-
ing new name is therefore established:
Peucedanum polyactinum B.L.Burtt, nom. nov.
Type. — Cape, Stellenbosch, Klapmuts, Ecklon & Zeyher
2239 (S).
Oreoselimim capense Eckl. & Zeyh., Enumeratio plantarum africae aus-
tralis extratropicae: 350 (1837). Peucedanum capense (Eckl. & Zeyh.)
D.Dietr.: 967 (1840), non P. capense (Thunb.) Sond. nom. conserv. Bubon
multiradiatum E.Mey. in Drege: 169 (1843) nom. nud. Bubon capense
(Eckl. & Zeyh.) Sond.: 561 (1862). Peucedanum multiradiatum Drude:
237 (1898), nom. illegit.
REFERENCES
BURTT, B.L. 1989. Proposals to conserve 960: Peucedanum capense
(Thunb.) Sond. Taxon 38: 525, 526.
BURTT, B.L. 1991. Umbelliferae of southern Africa: an introduction and
annotated checklist. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 48: 133-282.
DIETRICH, D.N.F. 1840. Synopsis plantarum. 2. Voigt, Weimar.
DREGE, J.F. 1843. Zwei pflanzengeographische Documente nebst einer
Einleitung von E. Meyer. Besondere Beigabe zur Flora 1843
Band 11.
DRUDE, C.G.O. 1898. Umbelliferae. In A.Engler & K.Prantl, Die nattir-
lichen Pflanzenfamilien 3: 237. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.
ECKLON, C.F. & ZEYHER, K.L.P. 1837. Enumeratio plantarum africae
australis extratropicae. Hamburg.
SONDER, O.W. 1862. Umbelliferae. In W.H. Harvey & O.W.Sonder,
Flora capensis 2: 524-567. Hodges & Smith, Dublin.
B.L. BURTT*
* Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh, EH3 5LR, UK.
MS. received: 1996-10-28.
PROTEACEAE
A NEW SPECIES OF LEUCADENDRON FROM THE WESTERN LITTLE KAROO
This large distinctive Leucadendron was unknown in
South African herbaria until specimens collected by Mr
David Osborne of the Cape Dept of Nature Conservation,
Ladismith, were submitted for identification in 1994.
Prior to that it had been observed at several sites on Anys-
berg at the western end of the Little Karoo in the Western
Cape by officers of the Cape Dept of Nature Conserva-
tion although the taxonomic status of these populations
was uncertain.
Subsequent field studies have established that it is fairly
widely dispersed at the western end of the Klein Swartberg
and Little Karoo. It is here described as new and commemo-
rates David Osborne, who made the first recorded herbarium
collections of this species and whose thorough collecting for
the Protea Atlas Project has greatly increased our knowledge
of the Proteaceae in the Little Karoo region.
Leucadendron osbornei Rourke sp. nov.
Frutex erectus robustus ad 4 m altus, Leucadendroni
teretifolio affine, sed statura grandiore, foliis glabris aceroso-
teretibus 15-28 mm longis, inflorescentiis masculinis 20-35
mm longis, et strobilis femineis maturis 30-40 mm longis
differ!.
type.— Western Cape, 3320 (Montagu). Witteport,
extreme western end of Klein Swartberg, (-BD), 9-11-
1995, J.P Rourke 2110 (NBG, male specimen, holo.!,
BOL, K, MO, NSW, PRE, S, iso.!).
Robust rigid shrub 1 .5-4.0 m tall with a stout main tmnk
to 75 mm in diam. Branches stiffly erect, rigid, glabrous,
5-10 mm in diam. Leaves acicular terete, 15-28 x 1. 5-2.0
mm, ascending, hard and cartilaginous, glabrous, slightly
glaucescent, upper surface minutely canaliculate; slightly
shorter in male plants. Male inflorescences densely clus-
tered in groups of 8 to 16 on short (30-60 mm long)
branchlets on flowering shoots. Inflorescence cylindric,
20-35 X 10 mm, pedunculate; peduncle 10 x 2 mm,
sparsely sericeous, covered with tightly adpressed subu-
late bracts 2-3 mm long, glabrous, but margins ciliate.
Floral bracts ovate, 1 x 1 mm, tightly clasping perianth,
glabrous but margins ciliate. Perianth sessile, 5-6 mm
long, straight, glabrous, bright yellow; perianth claws
equally recurved at anthesis; tube cylindrical. Anthers 4;
pollen powdery. Style filiform, 6 mm long, glabrous. Pol-
len presenter clavate-acute, 1 mm long. Hypogynous
scales 2 mm long, projecting to top of tube. Female in-
florescences free-standing, surrounded by a loose pseudo-
whorl of patent involucral leaves, greenish ivory to
yellow at anthesis. Flowering cone ovoid-clavate, obtuse,
30-40 X 12-14 mm, shortly pedunculate; peduncle 10-15
X 10 mm. Involucral bracts dark brown, very narrowly
lanceolate-acuminate to subulate, 8-12 x 1.5 mm, tightly
adpressed to peduncle, glabrous but margins ciliate. Flo-
ral bracts broadly ovate, acute, 3x5 mm, glabrous. Pe-
rianth 3 mm long, laterally compressed; tube region 2
mm long, densely sericeous; claws and limbs recurved,
glabrous. Staminodes generally 3, anterior staminode
usually absent. Style glabrous, 5 mm long, slightly
abaxially deflexed in upper half. Ovary ovoid to spheri-
cal, glabrous, 1 mm long. Pollen presenter minutely
capitellate, inconspicuously bilobed with glandular hairs
on the abaxial face. Hypogynous scales ovate-acute, 1
mm long. Mature female cone ovoid-acute, 35-60 x
25-30 mm, brown, becoming silvery grey with age. Fruit
a flattened black samara, 70 x 50 mm, apically retuse
(Figure 10).
Bothalia27,l (1997)
53
FIGURE 10. — Leucadendron osbor-
nei: A, young female cones
and a mature fruiting cone; B,
branches on an old female
plant showing serotinous
cones retained for up to eight
years; C, David Osborne next
to a mature female plant; D,
densely clustered male inflo-
rescences. B, C, & D taken at
type locality, Witteport, Klein
Swartberg.
Diagnostic characters
Apart from the obvious differences in the size and stat-
ure of the mature shrubs, L. osbornei is distinguished from
L. teretifolium by its longer leaves, 1 5-28 mm long; longer
male inflorescences, 20-35 mm long and by the much
longer (35-60 mm long) mature female cones. In L nobile
the male inflorescences are produced more sparsely in
TABLE 4. — Differences in leaf and inflorescence dimensions between
L. osbornei and related species
smaller numbers. The male inflorescences in L. nobile
(30-70 mm long) are very much larger than in L osbornei,
whereas the male flowers are loosely arranged in a lax spike
and are pubescent basally in the tube region. The male flow-
ers in L teretifolium usually have a bright red spot at the
apex of each bud but in both L osbornei and L. nobile they
are uniformly yellow (Table 4).
Key to species
la Male inflorescences globose, 5-10 mm long; mature female
cones up to 35 mm long teretifolium
lb Male inflorescences cylindric, 20-90 mm long; mature female
cones 30-90 mm long:
2a Male flowers completely glabrous; male inflorescences nu-
merous, 20-35 mm long, clustered together on short
branchlets; Western Cape, western Little Karoo . . . .osbornei
2b Male flowers minutely pubescent in tube region; male in-
florescences solitary, 30-70 mm long, sparsely pro-
duced; Eastern Cape, Kouga, Baviaanskloof &
Willowmore Mountains nobile
54
Bothalia 27,1 (1997)
Affinities
Leucadendron nobile Williams, L. teretifolium (Andr.)
Williams and the species here described as L. osbornei
Rourke form a well-defined group within Leucadendron
subsection Compressa, characterised by their uniformly
acicular glabrous leaves and glabrous cones.
The robust vegetative growth, large stature of the mature
shrub and impressive size of the mature female cones in L
osbornei initially suggested an affinity with L. nobile, a spe-
cies from the Humansdorp, Willowmore and Steytler-ville
Districts of the Eastern Cape. However, in the morphology,
arrangement and number of male inflorescences, L osbornei
is clearly more closely allied to L. teretifolium than to L
nobile. In both L. teretifolium and L. osbornei the male plants
are covered with masses of male inflorescences on short
branchlets borne at the ends of flowering shoots, and in botli
species the male flowers are completely glabrous and borne
in tightly congested cylindric inflorescences. This is unlike
L. nobile where the male inflorescences are relatively
sparsely produced on the ends of long shoots.
At one locality, a site south of trig, beacon 66 on
Matjiesgoedberg, L. osbornei and L. teretifolium occur
sympatrically (2-3 m apart), with no evidence of hybri-
dization. From observations made at this site, it appears
that there is little or no overlap in their flowering pe-
riods. During a site visit on 5-11-1996, L. teretifolium
was observed to be nearly past its flowering period
while L. osbornei was still in bud, about two weeks
from flowering.
Significantly, the male flowers in both species produce
quite different odours which may attract different pollina-
tors. The male flowers in L. teretifolium give off a sweet,
slightly lemon-scented odour with faint sulphurous under-
tones while in L. osbornei they produce a smell reminis-
cent of fresh human semen. Prominent nectar droplets
form at the base of the male flowers in L. osbornei which
attract large numbers of Diptera during the day when the
air temperature reaches about 25°C. I have not observed
potential pollinators on L. teretifolium. Both Williams
(1972) and Rebelo (1995) note that L. teretifolium pro-
duces showers of pollen when shaken, indicating that it
is wind-pollinated.
Distribution and habitat
This species is restricted to mountains at the western
end of the Little Karoo in the southwestern Cape at ele-
vations between 700 and 1 500 m. Populations of L. os-
bornei occur on Elandsberg north of Sevenweeks Poort at
its northeasterly limits; the western end of the Klein
Swartberg at Wittepoort and Paardenfontein; the north-
eastern corner of Touwsberg; on Anysberg; on Matjies-
goedberg north of Anysberg at the western end of its range
and on Rooiberg near the Floriskraal dam. Leucadendron
osbornei occurs mainly in Dry Mountain Fynbos or in the
ecotone between Dry Mountain Fynbos and Karroid Bro-
ken Veld (Acocks 1988) or between Dry Mountain Fynbos
and Central Mountain Rhenosterveld (Moll et al. 1984).
Most of the known localities are on Witteberg Quartzite
and a few are on Table Mountain Sandstone (Figure 1 1 ).
These localities are generally extremely arid, receiving
a mean annual rainfall of between 150 and 200 mm.
Merxmuellera arundinacea and Erica spectabilis are com-
monly associated species.
In several populations many of the shrubs observed
were between 3 and 4 m in height. The females are almost
invariably slightly taller than the males. Vegetative growth
in such habitats is slow, and attempts to count annual
vegetative growth increments indicated that such speci-
mens were in excess of 50 years old. Leucadendron os-
bornei is strongly serotinous, retaining unopened cones
for up to seven and eight years (Figure 12). Flowering
takes place from early to late November depending on
site aspect.
Conservation status
The exact conservation status of this species is not
clear as the known populations have not yet been ade-
quately assessed. Most populations which I have observed
consist of about 100 or fewer mature individuals. It is
probably best described as naturally rare but under no
obvious man-made threat at present. The Matjiesgoedberg
and Anysberg stands are protected within the Anysberg
Nature Reserve administered by the Cape Dept of Nature
Conservation.
Specimens examined
WESTERN CAPE. — 3320 (Montagu): Matjiesgoedberg, above Mat-
Jieskloof on South side below trig, beacon 66, (-BC), Nov., Rourke
2114 (NBG); Anysberg, 3.8 km west of trig, beacon 66 on Farm Mat-
jieskloof, (-BC), March 1994, Osborne 94022302 (NBG); Wittepoort,
western end of Klein Swartberg above Kromkloof, (-BD), March
1995, Rourke 2071 (NBG); Rooiberg, Drielingskloof, westernmost part
of peak on Laingsburg-Prince Albert road, 7-11-1994, Osborne s.n.
(NBG). 3321 (Ladismith): Touwsberg, on Farm Basseur, (-CA), 23-
9-1994, A. September 94092301 (NBG); Elandsberg, on Ylandskloof
211, 0.8 km from spot height 1533, (-AD), 13-11-1995, K. Mars
95111303 (NBG).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am most grateful to Mr David Osborne, Cape Dept
of Nature Conservation, Ladismith, who arranged several
BothaIia27,l (1997)
55
FIGURE 12. — Leucadendron osbor-
nei. A, female inflorescences in
flower, X 0.7; B, mature female
cone, X 0.7; C, seed, x 2.3; D,
section through leaf, x 5.4.
E-G, female flower, x 5.4: E, in
bud; F, open; G, gynoecium
with hypogynous scales. H,
shoot with male inflorescences,
X 0.7. I-K, male flower, x 5.4:
I, in bud; J, open; K, showing
pollen presenter and hypo-
gynous scales.
field excursions which enabled me to examine this species
at various localities within its distribution range and to Dr
Ion Williams who read and reviewed the manuscript.
REFERENCES
ACOCKS, J.PH. 1988. Veld types of South Africa, 3rd edn. Memoirs of
the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 57.
MOLL, E.J., CAMPBELL, B.M., COWLING, R.M., BOSSI, L., JAR-
MAN, M L. & BOUCHER, C. 1984. A description of major
vegetation categories in and adjacent to the fynbos biome. South
African National Scientific Programmes Report No. 83.
REBELO, T. 1995. SASOL proteas. A field guide to the proteas of
southern Africa. Femwood Press.
WILLIAMS, I.J.M. 1972. A revision of the genus Leucadendron (Pro-
teaceae). Contributions from the Bolus Herbarium No. 3.
J.P. ROURKE*
* Compton Herbarium, National Botanical Institute, Kirstenbosch, Pri-
vate Bag X7, Claremont 7735, Cape Town.
MS. received: 1996-12-11.
BORAGINACEAE
THE TAXONOMIC STATUS OF LOBOSTEMON HORRID US
Levyns (1934) in describing L. horridus Levyns, lists
a Levyns 2881 collection. She did not, however, personally
collect this material as it is clear from the particular her-
barium label that J. Rennie was the collector. Levyns
based her description on two herbanum specimens avail-
able to her, namely Compton 2971 (BOL) and J. Rennie
s.n. sub Levyns 2881 (BOL, STE). Subsequent collections
have been few and far between. A total of four collections.
the last being Acocks 23698 (PRE) in 1965, had been
made at the onset of the current revision of the genus.
The aforementioned scarcity of collections resulted in L.
horridus being included in the Red Data List of southern
African plants (Hilton-Taylor 1996). All attempts to re-
collect the taxon at the type locality have failed. The most
recent collection close to the type locality has been M.H.
Buys 523 at Pienaarskloof, about 40 km northwest of Mat-
56
Bothalia27,l (1997)
jiesfontein. Examination of all available herbarium speci-
mens as well as field work led us to suspect that L. hor-
ridus and L. paniculatus are conspecific.
According to the diagram presented by Levyns (1934:
412), L. paniculatus and L. horddus are closely related.
Although Levyns provides no summary of differing char-
acters in her diagnosis of L. horddus, one can catch a
glimpse at what her thoughts might have been through
her choice of the specific epithet. The herbarium speci-
mens at her disposal both exhibit leaves with an extremely
spinous indumentum. The current revision has confirmed
that leaf characters based on the indumentum are unreli-
able for systematic purposes. Levyns (1934) warns against
the undue use of morphological characters in Lobostemon,
yet leaf shape and indumentum type distinguish L. pani-
culatus from L. horridus in her key.
A critical comparison of characters between L. pani-
culatus and L. horridus reveals no significant diagnostic
differences between them. The difference in hairiness of
the leaves, the pronounced midrib and thickened margins
are ascribed to arid habitats. The less spiny forms ( = L.
paniculatus) are generally to be found near water in and
amongst the larger mountain ranges of the Swartberg. The
spiny forms ( = L. horridus) become more abundant as
one proceeds further into the interior of South Africa. The
variation allowed here in the indumentum with the sinking
of L. horridus is no greater than that allowed for in L.
echioides for example.
L paniculatus and L horridus share the following char-
acter states to the exclusion of the other members of the
section Lobostemon: 1, adaxial surface of young leaves ap-
pearing glabrous, becoming hairy with age; 2, possession of
two distinct trichome lengths; 3, two corolla lobes slightly
larger than the rest; 4, hairs on the abaxial side of the corolla
lobes largely confined to the midveins (this differs markedly
from L. echioides where the hairs are confined to the distal
parts of the lobes); 5, identical fruit structure.
It is for the above reasons that L. horridus Levyns is
viewed to be conspecific with L. paniculatus. The no-
menclatural history of L. paniculatus therefore reads as
follows:
Lobostemon paniculatus (Tliunb.) Buck in Linnaea
11: 139 (1837); DC.: 8 (1846); C.H. Wright: 33 (1904);
Levyns: 418 (1934). Type: Cap. b. Spei, Thunberg s.n.
sub UPS 4109 (UPS, holo.!).
Echium paniculatum Thunb.: 33 (1794); Willd.: 784 (1798); Pers.; 163
(1805); Schrad.: 41 (1806); Poir.: 675 (1808); Thunb.; 9 (1811); Lehm.:
425, 473 (1818); Roem. & Schult: 11 (1819); Lehm.: t. 23 (1823);
Thunb.: 165 (1823).
Lobostemon horridus Levyns: 419 (1934). Type: Whitehill near Mat-
jiesfontein, J. Rennie s.n. sub Levyns 2881 (BOL, lecto.!; STE, iso.!).
REFERENCES
BUEK, H.W. 1 837. Echia capensia. Liwzflefl 11: 129-149.
DE CANDOLLE, A.P. 1846. Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vege-
tabilis 10: 8. Treuttel & Wiirtz, London.
GREUTER, W., BARRIE, F. R., BURDET, H. M., CHALONER, W. G.,
DEMOULIN, V., HAWKSWORTH, D. L., JORGENSEN, P. M„
NICOLSON, D. H., SELVA, P. C., TREHANE, P. & MCNEILL,
J. 1994. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Tokyo
Code) adopted by the Fifteenth International Botanical Congress,
Yokohama, August-September 1993. Regnum vegetabile 131.
HILTON-TAYLOR, C. 1996. Red Data List of southern African plants.
Strelitzia 4. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria.
LEHMANN, J.G.C. 1818. Plantae e familiae Asperifoliarum nuciferae:
425, 473. Diimmler, Berlin.
LEHMANN, J.G.C. 1823. leones et descriptiones novarum et numis
cognitarum stirpium auctore 1 : t. 23. Perthes & Besser, Hamburg.
LEVYNS, M.R. 1934. A revision of Lobostemon. Journal of the Linnean
Society 49: 393^51.
PERSOON, C.H. 1805. Synopsis plantarum, sen Enchiridium botanicum
complectens enumerationem systematicam specierum hucusque
cognitarum 1: 163. Cramerum, Paris.
POIRET, J.L.M. 1808. Encyclopedic methodique, Botanique 8: 675.
Agasse, Paris.
ROEMER, J.J. & SCHULTES, J.A. 1819. Caroli a Linne equitis systema
vegetubilium: 11. Cottae, Stuttgardt.
SCHRADER, H.A. 1806. N cues Journal f Hr die Botanik 1,3: 41.
THUNBERG, C.P. 1794. Prodromm: 33.
THUNBERG, C.P. m\. Flora capensis edn 1, 1,2: 9.
THUNBERG, C.P. 1823. Flora capensis edn 2; 165.
WILLDENOW, C.L. 179^. Species plantarum 1,2:784.
WRIGHT, C.H. 1904. Flora capensis 4,2: 27-44. Lovell Reeve, London.
M.H. BUYSUnd J.J.A. VAN DER WALT*
* Depailment of Botany, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag XI,
Matieland, 7602 Stellenbosch.
MS. received: 1996-12-02.
Bothalia 27,1: 57-74(1997)
Composition and biogeography of forest patches on the inland mountains of
the southern Cape
C. J. GELDENHUYS*
Keywords: biogeography, corridors, evergreen forest, geomorphology, rare species, species-area relationship
ABSTRACT
Patterns in species richness of 23 small, isolated forests on the inland mountains of the southern Cape were studied. Species
richness of woody plants and vines of the Kouga-Baviaanskloof Forests was higher than in the western mountain complexes,
where species richness in the more southern Rooiberg and Kamanassie Mountains was higher than in the Swartberg range. The
Rooiberg, a dry mountain with small forests far away from the coastal source area, had more species than, and contained many
species which are absent from, the larger, moister forests of the Kamanassie which are closest to the coastal source areas. Neither
altitude nor distance from the source area, the forests south of the coastal mountains, nor long-distance dispersal, adequately
explained the variation in species richness. The variations are best explained in terms of dispersal corridors along the Gouritz
and Gamtoos River systems which connect the coastal forests with the inland mountains. The distribution patterns of four
species groups in relation to the geomorphological history of the two river systems provide relative dates for the expansion and
contraction of temperate forest, subtropical forest and subtropical transitional thicket in the southern Cape.
CONTENTS
Abstract 57
1 Introduction 57
2 Study area 59
3 Methods 60
4 Results 61
4.1 Species richness 61
4.2 Relationships between species richness and alti-
tude, forest area and distance from source ... 61
4.3 Distribution of taxa on different mountain com-
plexes 62
4.3.1 Widespread species on the inland mountains . 62
4.3.2 Species widespread in coastal forests but with
limited spread in study area 62
4.3.3 Species with limited/disjunct distribution in, or
absent from, the coastal forests 62
4.3.4 Endemic species of the region 62
4.4 Seed dispersal mechanisms 63
5 Discussion 63
5.1 Species richness 63
5.2 Habitat preferences of species 63
5.3 Species-area relationships and long-distance dis-
persal 64
5.4 Dispersal barriers and corridors 66
5.5 Forest migration in relation to climatic change . 66
5.5.1 Temperate forest 66
5.5.2 Subtropical forest 67
5.5.3 Subtropical transitional thicket and karroid
woodland 68
5.6 Endemic species 68
6 Conclusions 68
7 Acknowledgements 69
8 References 69
Appendix 70
* Division of Water, Environment and Forestry Technology, CSIR, R O.
Box 395, Pretoria 0001 .
MS. received: 1996-02-08.
1 INTRODUCTION
In the southern Cape several mountain complexes oc-
cur north (inland) of the coastal mountains. These inland
mountains are surrounded by semi-arid to arid valleys and
lowland. Two river systems, however, connect the inland
areas with the coast. A third river system almost breaks
through the coastal mountains near one of the inland
mountains. Forests on the inland mountains are very small
and isolated and are in sharp contrast to the large and
widespread forests along the coast (Anon. 1987). Their
distribution, composition and conservation status are
poorly known.
Axelrod & Raven (1978) and Deacon (1983) recon-
structed the palaeofloras of Africa. They speculated that
the temperate forest which covered the southern tip of
Africa during the Palaeocene (65 to 55 My BP) was re-
placed by subtropical forest during the Oligocene-Mio-
cene (37 to 5 My BP) and subsequently by fynbos and
arid shrublands during the Late Pleistocene (125 000 to
10 000 yBP). The general increasing aridity in the south-
ern Cape region since the beginning of the Miocene (24
My BP) (Deacon 1983) suggests further that over time
the inland forest patches became increasingly isolated.
Hypothetically the current flora of the isolated inland for-
ests would therefore consist of species which have sur-
vived in suitable refuge sites, species with tolerance
ranges which would enable them to survive in the changed
environment, and species which have colonized from suit-
able forest source areas. Geldenhuys (1986; 1992a, b;
1994) studied several aspects of the distribution, fragmen-
tation and biogeography of the South African forests in
general and the southern Cape coastal forests in particular.
The question was raised: how do the inland forests relate
to the coastal forests in the southern Cape? Several studies
have successfully used geomorphological evidence to re-
construct the biogeography of floras and taxa (Kaul et al.
1988; Moore 1988) and the phylogeny of families and
genera, e.g. of freshwater fishes (Skelton 1986). Smith
(1981) considered the geological and palaeogeographical
58
Bothalia27,l (1997)
FIGURE 1. — The study area of the southern Cape inland mountains in relation to the widespread forests south of the coastal ranges. The numbers represent the following study sites in the respective mountain complexes (the
forests are too small to be indicated on the map): Rooiberg:!, Bosrivier upper; 2, Bosrivier lower; 3, Assegaaibosrivier. Kamanassie: 4, Kluesrivier; 5, Meulrivier upper. Swartberg: 6, WaterkJoof; 7, Seweweekspoort;
8, Swartbergpoort; 9, Swartberg Pass; 10, Rust-en-Vrede; 11, Huisrivier upper; 12, Meiringspoort; 13, Tierkloof; 14, Cheridouwspoort. Kouga: 15, Sapreerivier. Baviaanskloof: 16, Doringkloof; 17, Diepnekkloof; 18,
Geelhoutbos; 19, Assegaaikloof; 20, Witrivierkloof upper; 21, Witrivierkloof lower; 22, Grootrivierpoort. Groendal: 23, Zungarivier.
Bothalia27,l (1997)
59
history of the landmasses around Tasmania as well as
colonizing ability and altitudinal range of species in a
study of the origin of the Tasmanian high mountain flora.
Taxa move from source areas along different pathways
(corridors, filters or sweepstake routes) to colonize new
sites (Brown & Gibson 1983). If they move along a cor-
ridor (which contains a wide variety of suitable sites or
habitats), the composition of the community in the new
site will be very similar to the community at the source.
If they move through a filter (which contains a limited
variety of suitable sites or habitats), the community at the
new site will contain a limited component of the source
community. If they move along a sweepstake route (which
cuts across areas with totally different environments), the
community in the new site will contain only species which
will survive long distance dispersal across unsuitable ar-
eas. Island biogeographic theory was evoked to explain
the extinction and colonization of animal species on oce-
anic islands of different size and distance away from the
source areas (MacArthur & Wilson 1967), and more re-
cently for plants in islands of fynbos in the southern Cape
forests (Bond et al. 1988). Dispersal is only of signifi-
cance if the organism can establish a viable population
upon arrival in the new area (Brown & Gibson 1983).
Physical and biological barriers to successful colonization
by forest plants are insufficient moisture (arid valleys),
extreme temperature (mountain tops, frost in valleys), dis-
turbance patterns (fire in fynbos) and absence of long dis-
tance dispersal agents (migrant frugivorous birds). How-
ever, man-induced changes in the vegetation and environ-
ment during historical times may eliminate or confuse the
evidence required to elucidate the biogeographical patterns.
The objectives of this study were:
• to determine the patterns in species composition and
richness of forest communities in different inland moun-
tain complexes of the southern Cape.
• to explain the observed patterns in terms of habitat
preferences of species; species-area and species-distance
relationships; long-distance dispersal; dispersal corridors
in relation to the geomorphological history of the land-
scapes in the region.
• to aid interpretation of vegetation changes in the
coastal forests from the dating of forest expansion and
contraction on the inland mountains.
2 STUDY AREA
The study covers the Cape Folded Belt in the southern
Cape of South Africa, between Ladismith and Riversdale
in the west and Humansdorp in the east (Figure 1 ). A site
in the Groendal Wilderness Area northwest of Port Eliza-
beth was included as a riverine site in the coastal moun-
tains which appeared to be similar to the sites in the inland
mountains. The dominant physiographic feature of the
main study area are the subparallel mountain ranges and
the intermontane lowland belts which run approximately
east- west (Lenz 1957). In the west the Swartberg range,
the highest range in the study area (up to 2 250 m) forms
the northern boundary. The Kouga-Baviaanskloof Moun-
tain complex forms the northern boundary to the east. It
consists of several parallel ranges with relatively narrow
east-trending valleys. The coastal Langeberg-Outeniqua-
Tsitsikamma ranges form the southern boundary. A
number of smaller, almost isolated mountains occur be-
tween the Swartberg and the Langeberg-Outeniqua ranges:
Rooiberg-Gamka Hill between Calitzdorp and Ladismith,
and Kamanassie Mountain between Oudtshoorn and Un-
iondale. The Oudtshoorn basin is a large semi-arid low-
land between the Swartberg, Rooiberg, Outeniqua and
Kamanassie Mountains which comprises hills of Creta-
ceous conglomerates (Lenz 1957). The relatively narrow
Langkloof valley separates the Tsitsikamma Mountains
from the Kouga Mountains. Groendal is a hilly landscape
between the Great Winterhoek and Elandsberg Mountains.
A relatively dry coastal plain occurs to the southeast of
Groendal.
Three river systems link, or partially link, the coastal
area with the inland mountains and are important for the
interpretation of the forest flora. The Gouritz River
breaches the Langeberg-Outeniqua ranges west of Mossel
Bay through the Gouritzpoort. Inland it is formed by the
confluence south of the Rooiberg of the Olifants River
which drains the Oudtshoorn basin, the Gamka River
which flows through the Swartberg north of Calitzdorp
and which drains the Karoo west of Beaufort West, and
the Groot River which drains the area to the west of the
Rooiberg. Tributaries of these rivers breach the Swartberg
range through several poorts such as, from west to east,
Seweweekspoort, Gamkapoort, Meiringspoort and Cheri-
douwspoort. A poort is a relatively narrow, steep-walled
opening, cutting almost perpendicularly across a topo-
graphic barrier, through which the open areas on either
side are connected, usually by a river (Lenz 1957). The
Keurbooms River which runs between the Kamanassie
Mountain and Plettenberg Bay, does not fully breach the
gap between the Outeniqua and Tsitsikamma ranges south
of the Kamanassie Mountain. A low, narrow ridge sepa-
rates its origin from the Kamanassie River which drains
the southern slopes of the Kamanassie Mountain and runs
in a northwesterly direction to join the Olifants River. The
Gamtoos River east of Humansdorp is formed by the con-
fluence of the Baviaanskloof and Groot Rivers. The
Witrivier is a small stream which joins the Groot River
north of the Grootrivierpoort at Cambria. The Zunga (or
Swartkops) River runs from Groendal towards the coast
at Port Elizabeth.
Geologically the mountains owe their existence to their
heavily folded structure and the resistance of the quartzitic
Table Mountain Sandstones to weathering. Softer sand-
stones and shales of the Bokkeveld Series eroded more
readily to form the syncline valleys (Lenz 1957; Theron
1962; Toerien 1979).
The few weather stations in the area all occur in the
lowlands. Data are available for short periods for a
number of rain gauges across the Swartberg (along the
Pass and in the east) and Kamanassie Mountains. Rainfall
increases linearly with increase in elevation, and rain
shadow effects are apparent on north slopes. In the Swart-
berg Pass area annual rainfall declines rapidly from 725
mm at 1 600 m to 210 mm at 884 m on the northern
foothills and to 182 mm at 686 m in Prince Albert on the
edge of the Great Karoo (Bond 1981). Annual rainfall on
the southern foothills is 411 mm at 640 m (Cango Caves)
60
Bothalia27,l (1997)
and 570 mm at 762 m (Rust-en-Vrede, forest site No. 10,
Figure 1, Table 1) (Weather Bureau 1986 unpubl.). In
Swartberg East, near Blesberg between the Tierkloof and
Cheridouwspoort sites (Nos 13 & 14 respectively), annual
rainfall ranged from 766 mm on the northern midslope,
to 847 mm on the crest, 798 mm on the upper south slope
and 572 mm on the southern foothills (unpublished data).
In the Kamanassie annual rainfall near the crest ranged
between 815 mm on the southern side and 682 mm on
the northern side, and declined to 239 mm on the southern
foothill and 169 mm on the northern foothill (Kamanassie
Policy Memorandum, Department of Nature Conserva-
tion). Rainfall data for Rooiberg are unreliable but appear
to be lower than for the Kamanassie, also as judged from
the appearance of the fynbos vegetation on the southern
slopes. Rainfall in the lowlands ranges between 220 mm
at Van Wyksdorp (305 m) on the southern footslopes of
the Rooiberg, 244 mm at Oudtshoom (335 m), 482 mm
at Joubertina (544 m) in the Langkloof, 321 mm at Studtis
(760 m) in the western end of Baviaanskloof, and 536
mm on the southern foothills of Groendal (229 m; forest
site No. 23) (Weather Bureau 1986 unpubl.).
Reliable information on temperature regimes is less
available. Diurnal and seasonal temperature variation is
large. Mean maximum temperature for the warmest month
is 31.8°C for Oudtshoom and 27.8°C for Uitenhage and
the mean minimum temperature for the coldest month is
3.5°C and 5.8°C for the two towns respectively. The mean
number of days per annum with frost is 7.3 and 1.4 for
the two towns (Weather Bureau 1986). Snow occurs five
or six times per annum on the Swartberg and may lie for
more than two weeks (Bond 1981).
The main vegetation types of the area have been de-
scribed by Acocks (1988), Taylor (1979), Bond (1981)
and Cowling (1984), and in unpublished reports. Moun-
tain fynbos and grassy fynbos cover most of the moun-
tains and are interspersed with small patches of evergreen
forest in protected gullies and valleys. Karroid broken veld
covers the low-lying valleys of the Little Karoo, and sub-
tropical transitional thicket extends south of Groendal and
occurs in parts of Baviaanskloof
3 METHODS
Twenty-three forested gorges, gullies and riverine sites
were visited to represent the variety of sites with forest
species encountered on the inland mountains (Figure 1;
Table 1). In this study the definition of a forest (Gelden-
huys et al. 1988) was extended to accommodate scattered
bush clumps and isolated trees of species which are usu-
ally associated with forest, as observed in Seweweek-
spoort, Meiringspoort and Cheridouwspoort. For each
study site a list was compiled of all plant species which
were associated with the forest communities. Emphasis
was placed on recording all tree and shrub species, but
taxa of other growth forms were also recorded as com-
pletely as possible.
The size of each forest (Table 1) was estimated in the
field. Most forests consisted of a long, narrow stand along
a stream or river. The length of the stream which was
covered in the survey was estimated from 1 : 50 000 topo-
graphic maps and the mean width of the forest was esti-
mated in the field. Altitude was read from the relevant
1 : 50 000 topographic maps.
Obvious or important disturbance factors affecting the
forest communities were recorded. These included fire,
flooding of rivers, landslides and wind.
TABLE 1 . — List of forested sites vjsited in the inland mountains of the southern Cape
Bothalia27,l (1997)
61
TABLE 2. — Number of species by growth forms for the forest sites on the inland mountains of the southern Cape
The relationship between the number of woody species
(plus vines) or the number of herbaceous species in a for-
est and the altitude, forest area and direct distance (km)
to the nearest source area was determined by means of
stepwise multiple regression (STSC 1986). Log transfor-
mations were used for all variables because of the highly
skew nature of the observations, a procedure usually fol-
lowed in such studies (Bond et al. 1988). The southern
Cape forests (Geldenhuys 1993a), marked in black as ‘in-
digenous forest’, and ‘island’ coastal forest west of Port
Elizabeth (Figure 1) were considered to be the nearest
source areas.
The distribution of taxa, mainly woody species, on the
inland mountains was represented by means of tables
which indicate the frequency of species on each particular
mountain range or in similar sites within a range. The
sites were grouped on the basis of assumed dispersal bar-
riers and corridors, as follows: Swartberg sites in three
subgroups, i.e. on the northern slopes, at high altitudes
and on the southern slopes; Rooiberg; Kamanassie;
Kouga-Baviaanskloof; Grootrivierpoort, including the
lower site of the Witrivierkloof; and the Groendal site (see
Tables 5-8). The most likely dispersal mechanisms for the
species are indicated and are based on Coates Palgrave
(1977) and my own observations (Geldenhuys 1993a).
The plant nomenclature follows Arnold & De Wet
(1993) and the plant author names are according to Brum-
mitt & Powell (1992).
4 RESULTS
4.1 Species richness
The species are listed in the Appendix and summarized
by growth forms for the different sites (Table 2). Woody
plants and vines form the bulk of the species.
Species numbers vary greatly between sites. In general
there is a decline in species richness from east to west
and from south to north. The mean number of species per
site in the Kouga-Baviaanskloof complex is double the
number in the Swartberg range. Note however that the
mean number of species, particularly woody species, in
the Rooiberg forests tends to be higher than the number
in the Kamanassie forests.
4.2 Relationship between species richness and altitude,
forest area and distance from source
The number of woody species (plus vines) is signifi-
cantly correlated with altitude and forest area (Table 3),
but not with distance to source area. Altitude alone ex-
62
Bothalia27,l (1997)
TABLE 3. — Analysis of variance for the stepwise multiple regression of the dependence of the (log) number of woody species and vines in a
forest on its altitude and area
Independent variable Coefficient Standard error t-value Significance level
Constant 3.132426 0.221281 14.1559 0.0000
Log Altitude, m -0.635723 0.078427 -8.1059 0.0000
Log Area, ha 0.195371 0.043653 4.4756 0.0002
(adjusted for Df) = 0.8582; Standard error of the estimate = 0.0975 1 .
plains 74% of the variation in number of woody species.
The number of herbaceous species is significantly corre-
lated only with forest size, but this regression model ex-
plains only 18% of the observed variation.
4.3 Distribution oftaxa on different mountain complexes
Only 10% of the species occur in more than 50% of
the sites and these are mostly tree and shrub species (Table
4). For example, 48 of the 118 tree and shrub species
occurred in one or two sites only, i.e. 10% or less of the
sites. The pattern of occurrence of species on the different
mountain ranges became clearer when the pattern was
considered in relation to the distribution range of species
in both the inland and coastal forests.
4.3.1 Widespread species on the inland mountains
Species which occur in more than 50% of the sites
occur in most sites of all the mountain groups (Table 5).
Site preferences of the species are based on their occur-
rence in the coastal forests (Geldenhuys 1993a). The
Kamanassie sites lack several species which have a pref-
erence for drier habitats although these species occur in
the high altitude sites of the Swartberg. Those which do
occur in the Kamanassie are confined to the lower end of
Kluesrivier.
4.3.2 Species widespread in coastal forests but with limited
spread in study area
Very few of the widespread species of the coastal for-
ests which have a limited spread on the inland mountains
do occur in the Swartberg range (Table 6). Those which
do occur there are confined to the southern sites. Note
again that very few of these species occur in the Kamanas-
sie. However, two of the Kamanassie species are absent
from the Rooiberg, i.e. Rapanea melanophloeos and
Diospyros whyteana. Ocotea bullata is confined to the
Kamanassie and one site in the Rooiberg. Many of the
Rooiberg species are absent from the Kamanassie. The
majority of the species occur in Groendal and Grootrivier-
poort and in one or more sites of the Kouga-Baviaanskloof,
and many of these are absent from the Kamanassie or
Rooiberg. Note the decrease in number of species from
Groendal through Grootrivierpoort to the Baviaanskloof.
4.3.3 Species with limited/disjunct distribution in, or absent
from, the coastal forests
These species fall in two groups: those which are con-
fined to the western ranges, i.e. Swartberg, Rooiberg and
Kamanassie; and those which are confined to the eastern
ranges (Table 7). Note again the decrease in number of
species from Groendal through Grootrivierpoort to the
Baviaanskloof.
4.3.4 Endemic species of the region
Nine woody species are endemic to the study area, or
have their main distribution in the southern Cape. Of these
only Virgilia divaricata is widespread in the study area
(Table 8). Laurophyllus capensis, which has a wide dis-
tribution in the coastal areas, is confined to a few sites in
the Groendal area where it grows in association with V.
divaricata. Strelitzia alba, not recorded during this study,
has since been recorded from one locality in the Kouga
Mountains (M. Yates pers. comm. 1991; see Geldenhuys
1992a for its distribution in the coastal forests).
TABLE 4. — Absolute and relative frequencies by which species of different growth forms occur in the 23 forested study sites in the inland moun-
tains of the southern Cape
Bothalia27,l (1997)
63
TABLE 5. — Distribution and fruit/seed dispersal of species widespread in forested sites on the inland mountain ranges of the southern Cape
' Fruit/seed dispersal mechanisms: •, bird/mammal; +, small/large dry seed not dispersed by wind; #, wind dispersal.
^ Mountain range; SB, Swartberg (see ^ below); RB, Rooiberg (sites 1-3); KN, Kamanassie (sites 4, 5); BK, Baviaanskloof (sites 15-20); GR,
Grootrivier (sites 21, 22); GD, Groendal (site 23).
^ N, north (sites 8, 13 & 14); U, upper (sites 9 & 11); S, south (sites 6, 7, 10 & 12).
* Maximum number of sites per range for comparison with number of sites in which a species is present.
4.4 Seed dispersal mechanisms
The majority of woody species (Tables 5-8) have
fleshy fruits or seeds which are dispersed by frugivorous
birds and/or mammals. Among the plants with dry
propagules, only the ferns, the bane Secamone alpini and
the two Brachylaena species are readily dispersed by
wind. Cunonia capensis, Nuxia floribunda, Buddleja
saligna and B. salviifolia produce small seeds in capsules
which may be blown over short distances in strong wind.
Gonioma kamassi, Ptaeroxylon obliquum and some of the
other species have winged seeds which are not well suited
for wind dispersal. Note that the majority of endemic spe-
cies (Table 8) have dry seeds which are not particularly
adapted for dispersal over longer distances.
5 DISCUSSION
5.1 Species richness
The forests on the inland mountains of the southern
Cape contain 118 tree and woody shrub species, 24 of
which are not included in the 140 tree and shrub species
of the coastal forests (Geldenhuys 1993a). The difference
in number of species of the herbaceous growth forms be-
tween the two areas is much larger. It has been assumed
that woody species are more persistent in suitable habitats
because the majority of them can resprout after fire, and
that they create the micro-habitat for forest understorey
plants. In this discussion interpretation of the patterns in
species richness and composition is almost confined to
the woody species.
5.2 Habitat preferences of species
Habitat preferences of species along an altitudinal gra-
dient do not explain the major differences in species com-
position of forests in different parts of the inland
mountains. The decrease in species richness of woody
plants and vines with increasing altitude suggests that
many species cannot grow at high altitude. The majority
of the widespread species of the eoastal forests which have
a limited distribution in the inland sites are indeed con-
fined to the low-lying mountain valleys and riverine sites.
However, these species are also absent from similar sites
on the northern side of the Swartberg range, and many
are absent from similar sites on the southern Swartberg,
the Kamanassie and the Rooiberg (Table 6).
64
BothaIia27,l (1997)
TABLE 6. — Distribution and fruit/seed dispersal of species widespread in the coastal forests of the southern Cape but with a limited spread in the
study area
‘ Fruit/seed dispersal mechanisms: •, bird/mammal; +, small/large dry seed not dispersed by wind.
^ Mountain range: SB, Swartberg (see ^ below); RB, Rooiberg (sites 1-3); KN, Kamanassie (sites 4, 5); BK, Baviaanskloof (sites 15-20); GR,
Grootrivier (sites 21, 22); GD, Groendal (site 23).
^ N, north (sites 8, 13 & 14); U, upper (sites 9 & 11); S, south (sites 6,7, 10 & 12).
Maximum number of sites per range for comptuison with number of sites in which a species is present.
’ Species which occur in only the GR & GD sites.
^ Species which occur only in Groendal.
Where habitat preferences have been attached to some
species (Table 5), their demonstrated wide tolerances do
not explain their absence from certain forests. The wide-
spread species associated with moist coastal sites, occur
on the inland sites both at high and low altitudes and in
sites which are relatively dry. In several sites they are not
confined to the moist, cool sites along the streams, but
grow on steep, exposed slopes and often shallow, rocky
sites far above the streams, for example in the Kamanas-
sie, the upper Bosrivier, Meiringspoort and Sapreerivier
sites. Only widespread inland species which are associated
with both dry and moist coastal sites, grow in the northern
Swartberg sites (Table 5), often where the stream courses
open up to the north into the arid Great Karoo.
5.3 Species-area relationships and long-distance dispersal
Area is a significant variable in the regression models;
this explains the richness of both woody and herbaceous
species but in both cases accounts for a relatively small
Bothalia27,l (1997)
65
TABLE 7. — Distribution and fruit/seed dispersal of species which have a limited or disjunct distribution in, or which are absent from the coastal
forests of the southern Cape
' Fruit/seed dispersal mechanisms: •, bird/mammal; +, small/large dry seed not dispersed by wind.
^ Mountain range; SB, Swartberg (see below); RB, Rooiberg (sites 1-3); KN, Kamanassie (sites 4, 5); BK, Baviaanskloof (sites 15-20); GR,
Grootrivier (sites 21, 22); GD, Groendal (site 23).
^ N, north (sites 8, 13 & 14); U, upper (sites 9 & 1 1); S, south (sites 6, 7, 10 & 12).
Maximum number of sites per range for comparison with number of sites in which a species is present.
66
Bothalia27,l (1997)
portion of the variation. Direct distance from the source
areas ranges from 30 to 80 km but is an insignificant
variable in the regression models. For example, the
Kamanassie Forests are some of the largest in the study
area, are the closest to the coastal forests, particularly the
large forests north of Knysna, and represent the moistest
sites; yet they contain fewer species than the Rooiberg
Forests and lack several species which are present in the
Rooiberg. The Rooiberg is a drier mountain, has small
forests and its closest source areas are scattered forests
between Mossel Bay and George to the southeast and
some Langeberg forests west of Riversdale.
The distribution patterns of very few species support
claims of long-distance dispersal despite the fact that the
majority of tree and shrub species have fleshy fruits or
seeds, many of which I have observed being eaten by
birds in the coastal forests.
• Rapanea melanophloeos and Ficus burtt-davyi occur
in one and two sites respectively in the Swartberg range
which could be attributed to long-distance dispersal.
Ocotea bullata may have been dispersed into the Rooiberg
and Kamanassie from relatively nearby forests with O.
bullata which exist on the northern slopes of the Lange-
berg (Garcia Pass near Riversdale) and Outeniqua Moun-
tains (Robinson Pass near Mossel Bay and near Noll west
of Uniondale).
• Most of the species which are present in the
Rooiberg but absent from the Kamanassie are generally
readily dispersed by birds. Their absence from the
Kamanassie and the limited distribution in the study area
of other similarly readily dispersed species of the coastal
forests such as Apodytes dimidiata, the two Podocarpus
species, the two Olea capensis subspecies, Psydrax
obovata and Canthium muiidianum casts doubt on the
relevance of long-distance dispersal in the study area.
• Several species which release minute dry seeds from
dry capsules, but which are not effectively dispersed by wind,
show distribution patterns which are similar to the patterns
of frugivorous species. Examples are Cunonia capensis,
Nuxia floribunda, Buddleja saligna and B. salviifolia. Their
dispersal by birds or mammals is very unlikely.
• The absence of suitable dispersal vectors may be the
reason for the insignificance of long-distance dispersal.
The sites were visited during different seasons over sev-
eral years but only one Rameron pigeon (Columba arqua-
trix) was seen in the Swartberg Pass Forest. No studies
exist to indicate the migration patterns of frugivorous birds
in the southern Cape. It has been suggested that the Ra-
meron pigeon migrates up and down the coast (Phillips
1927). That Rameron pigeons would fly from the coast
where food sources are more readily available to the in-
land mountain forests where their food sources are more
limited and possibly irregularly available seems highly un-
likely. Small flocks of Red-winged starlings {Onycho-
gnathus morio) were often seen in the vicinity of the
inland forests, but rarely seen along the coast.
5.4 Dispersal barriers and corridors
The parallel mountain ranges are obvious barriers to the
dispersal of forest taxa from the coast to the inland forests.
The mountain ridges exp>erience strong, cold winds and ex-
treme temperatures. Ice often forms in the sheltered gullies
near the top (pers. obs.). Frequent controlled and natural fires
in the fynbos on the mountain slopes prevent the estab-
lishment of forest species in the exposed sites and confine
or eliminate existing forests. This was observed in most
of the sites or was evident in the small sizes of trees near
the forest edge in more protected sites.
Dry lowlands and valleys of the Little Karoo minimize
the number of species which are able to cross them by
means of establishment in small bush clumps in a step-
ping-stone fashion.
The obvious dispersal corridors are the Zunga River,
the Gamtoos River through the Grootrivierpoort and Ba-
viaanskloof, the Keurbooms River and the Gouritzpoort.
The first two river systems are effective corridors for
stepping-stone dispersal. The sites along the Zunga River
the end constitute of the subtropical transitional thicket
and riverine forests which are connected with the Alex-
andria and other coastal forests. Many streams run into
the Baviaanskloof River from the mountain ridges to its
north and south and provide refuge sites for forest spe-
cies. The Baviaanskloof shares many of the species
which^ occur in the Grootrivierpoort and Witrivierkloof
and at Groendal. The remaining two rivers are not effec-
tive corridors. The Keurbooms River does not breach the
relatively low Outeniqua-Tsitsikamma mountain ridge to
provide direct and easy access for dispersal of forest spe-
cies from the large Knysna forests to the Kamanassie
Mountains. The Gouritzpoort contains no sheltered sites
for forest establishment and north of the poort is an arid
lowland. It is not connected with any nearby forests to
the south of the poort. It may have been an effective
dispersal corridor in earlier, moister periods, but not un-
der the present climate.
5.5 Forest migration in relation to climatic change
Following on from the earlier discussion, it is therefore
suggested that the variation in species richness on the in-
land mountains is mainly the result of different degrees
of intermingling during the contraction and expansion of
the different floras due to climatic and landscape changes
since the Palaeocene. Only tree and woody shrub species
have been considered for this interpretation because it has
been assumed they are the key elements which create the
specific micro-habitats for herbaceous elements of the un-
derstorey of particular vegetation units. Certain under-
storey species should therefore correlate with the
distribution pattern of particular groups of tree species.
Factors such as the altitudinal gradient, forest size, site
preferences and dispersal corridors and mechanisms are
merely contributing to this variation within a particular
mountain range. In this study at least four floras can be
recognized from the distribution patterns of the species as
listed in Tables 5 to 8, namely: temperate or austral forest
relicts; subtropical forest; subtropical transitional thicket
and karroid riverine woodland.
5.5.1 Temperate forest
It is suggested that most of the widespread inland spe-
cies characteristic of moist sites (Table 5) represent relicts
of the temperate austral forests (such as Cunonia capensis)
or high-altitude forests of tropical latitudes (such as Ilex
mitis, Halleria lucida and Kiggelaria africana) which cov-
Bothalia27,l (1997)
67
ered the southern tip of Africa during the Palaeocene,
rather than recent dispersal events. These temperate forests
were eliminated with changes toward warmer and more
humid climates associated with the northward drift of the
African continent (Axelrod & Raven 1978; Deacon 1983).
These constituent species grow in forests on all the moun-
tain complexes in the study area, and are the only species
which grow in sheltered sites on the northern slopes of the
Swartberg range. They are also the main species of the for-
ests in the cool, sheltered kloofs and gorges of the inland
mountain ranges in the southwestern Cape (pers. obs.). Many
of them occur in the isolated Affomontane forests of southern
and eastern Africa (Killick 1963; Chapman & White 1970;
Dowsett-Lemaire 1988). The poorts through the Swartberg
range had breached the ranges by the early Tertiary (Lenz
1957) and would have allowed dispersal of other readily
dispersed species through the poorts from south to north, if
they were present by that time. Even if it is argued that in
more recent times the fleshy-lhiited tree species may have
been dispersed to the northern side of the Swartberg by birds,
the argument does not account for the presence of Cunonia
capensis with its small, diy seeds. The wide habitat toler-
ances of these species enabled them to survive and to occur
widespread in the study area, and in southern Africa (Geld-
enhuys 1992b).
Species which could be added to the list of temperate
forest species are Pterocelastrus rostratus, Diospyros
glabra and Brachylaena neriifolia. Their eastern distribu-
tion limits in the study area (Table 7) coincide with the
longitude of their eastern limits in the coastal forests
(Geldenhuys 1992a). Their distribution patterns suggest a
more continuous distribution at some early period which
was later fragmented into their present pattern.
5.5.2 Subtropical forest
It is suggested that the widespread coastal forest spe-
cies with limited spread in the inland sites (Table 6) rep-
resent elements of the subtropical forest which replaced
the temperate forests since the Oligocene-Miocene (Axel-
rod & Raven 1978; Deacon 1983). Most of these species
occur also in the coastal forests of the southern and south-
western Cape (Geldenhuys 1993a; McKenzie 1978).
These forests have expanded from the east. The easterly
orientation of the Zunga and Gamtoos Rivers and the
Kouga-Baviaanskloof valleys suggests that they would
have been more readily colonized by the expanding sub-
tropical forests. The Gouritz River breached the Lange-
berg-Outeniqua range during the late Cretaceous as a
subsequent poort, i.e. it developed along a relatively
weaker part of the range by a headward eroding stream
(Lenz 1957). With widespread forest along the coast south
of the Outeniqua-Langeberg Mountains and with a more
humid climate (Hendey 1983) the Gouritz River could
have been a suitable dispersal corridor for some species
to enter the southern sides of the Rooiberg. The Rooiberg-
Gamka mountain range forms a loose connection to the
southeast with the Outeniqua range and may have had
sheltered sites on the southwestern side. Today several
species of the western fynbos element, e.g. Mimetes cu-
cullatus, that are characteristic of the wetter coastal
ranges, also occur on the Rooiberg-Gamka range and the
adjacent Outeniqua range (Taylor 1979; J.H.J. Vlok pers.
comm. 1988). They support the dispersal route suggested
for the forest species, although the fynbos migration re-
lates to Late Pleistocene times and different environmental
conditions which would not support forest.
The nature of the deposits in the Oudtshoom Basin
suggests that the climate during the Late Cretaceous was
similar to the present semi-arid climate and the Olifants
River portion of the breach between Rooiberg and Gamka
Hill occurred as late as Plio-Pleistocene (Lenz 1957). This
semi-arid climate and the late breach would have pre-
vented the spread of subtropical forest towards the Swart-
berg. The absence of a direct corridor between the
Keurbooms River and the Kamanassie accounts for the
absence from the Kamanassie of several Knysna forest
species, which are present in the Rooiberg (Table 6).
Some of the widespread as well as disjunctly distributed
coastal species are confined to the Groendal, Grootrivier-
poort and lower Witrivierkloof sites (Tables 6 & 7; Ap-
pendix). Two possible explanations for this pattern are: 1,
most of these species have relatively large fruits or seeds
which require specialized dispersal vectors. The seeds of
some species such as Podocarpus latifolius and Caloden-
drum capense loose viability fast when they dry out, and
those of other species such as Olea capensis subsp. macro-
carpa and Cassine papillosa have long germination peri-
ods due to woody seed coats (Geldenhuys 1975, 1996)
and are then liable to predation by rodents (pers. obs.).
However, others with similar seed types occur further into
the Kouga-Baviaanskloof complex such as Ekebergia cap-
ensis and Podocarpus falcatus (both are dispersed by bats;
see Geldenhuys 1993b for P falcatus); 2, a more likely
explanation is that the subtropical forests expanded in dif-
ferent waves and that each wave contained a different set
of species. The expansion and contraction could be related
to successive periods of high and low sea levels respec-
tively, which in turn were associated with humid and arid
periods respectively (Hendey 1983). During later periods
of forest expansion along the coast, some areas, particu-
larly the more arid inland areas, may not have been suit-
able for the colonization by forest species.
For example, Podocarpus falcatus occurs as far west
as Swellendam, and P latifolius as far west as the Cape
Peninsula (Von Breitenbach 1986). Both grow in small
forest patches near the southern exit of the Gouritz River
through the Langeberg-Outeniqua ranges. Both are readily
dispersed in the southern Cape coastal forests (Geldenhuys
1980, 1993a, b) but have a limited entry in the Baviaanskloof
and are absent from the Rooiberg and Kamanassie. It is
suggested that they represent a relatively late southwestern
expansion of the subtropical forests when barriers of semi-
arid lowlands inland of the coastal mountains prevented
their spread inland. This implies that the two Podocarpus
species have a tropical origin and are not part of the aus-
tral flora as has often been suggested (e.g. Levy ns 1964).
Their large fruit size indicates a tropical affinity (Givnish
1980), in contrast to the small fruit size of austral podo-
carps of Australia, New Zealand and Chili (pers. obs.). It
is suggested that the fossil podocarp pollens from some
southwestern Cape sites (e.g. Coetzee 1986) may repre-
sent austral podocarps which became extinct with the re-
gression of the early temperate forests and before the
present species arrived in the area.
Some species represent the spread of subtropical tran-
sitional thicket (Cowling 1984; Everard 1987). Species
68
Bothalia27,l (1997)
such as Ptaeroxylon obliquum, Diospyros scabrida and
Pavetta lanceolata have not yet reached the southern Cape
coastal forests. Others have reached the southern Cape but
were cut off by the Late Pleistocene-Holocene marine
transgression, e.g. Hippobromus pauciflorus, Schotia lad-
folia and Plumbago auriculata (Geldenhuys 1992a).
Some coastal dune forest species, such as Strychnos
decussata and Eugenia zeyheri, require specialized sites
which prevented their spread inland. For example, S.
decussata grows on a terrace along the Zunga River in a
site similar to that in which the species grows in Nature’s
Valley along the southern Cape coast (Geldenhuys 1986).
Strelitzia alba also falls in this category.
Some species, such as Trichocladus ellipticus, repre-
sent relicts of a retreating forest flora (Geldenhuys 1992a).
5.5.3 Subtropical transitional thicket and karroid wood-
land
The widespread inland species of drier sites (Table 5)
are generally associated with subtropical transitional
thicket (Cowling 1984; Everard 1987). They have prob-
ably become mixed with the more tolerant moist forest
elements with the increasing aridity since the beginning
of the Miocene-Pliocene (Deacon 1983). They occur in
few of the sites at higher altitudes. They are more promi-
nent in the bush clumps and subtropical transitional
thicket of the more arid lowlands and riverine sites in the
drier, open valleys of the Baviaanskloof and Karoo. They
occur in the drier parts of moist sites as they are found
where streams from the mountains open up into the dry
valleys, or on the drier slopes above the streams, or along
open valleys or gorges such as Meiringspoort. Seeds of
several of the species were found along the krantzes above
the study sites and it is assumed that Red-winged starlings
(O. mono) dispersed the seeds from the lowlands or other
nearby sites. Many of these species are, however, absent
from the Kamanassie sites although they are present in
the lowlands further away from the mountain. The higher
(Eo-Oligocene) and lower (Mio-Pliocene) surfaces on the
southern side of the Kamanassie (Lenz 1957) could ac-
count for this absence. At Boomplaas Cave, between the
Swartberg Pass and Rust-en-Vrede sites, charcoal assem-
blages indicate that A. karroo only became dominant in
the late Holocene during more mesic conditions (Scholtz
1986). This species was absent from charcoal layers older
than 12 000 years although it was apparently a much pre-
ferred firewood. It became a major component of wood-
land in the valley near the cave after 5 000 yBP, after an
initial spread into the valley during the early Holocene
(Deacon et al. 1983).
5.6 Endemic species
The endemic species represent two major groups; forest
margin species such as Virgilia divaricata (Phillips 1926),
Laurophyllus capensis (Phillips 1931; Geldenhuys 1993a)
and Widdringtonia schwarzii (Liickholf 1963); and species
of drier sites such as Lachnostylis bilocularis and
Loxostylis alata (Palmer & Pitman 1972). The sites in
which the forest margin species mature suggest that they
can only persist with less frequent fires than under which
fynbos persists. This has been shown for L. capensis (Vlok
& De Ronde 1989). Trees of V. divaricata (Phillips 1926)
and Widdringtonia schwarzii (Liickhoff 1963) are killed by
fires and depend on reseeding for regeneration. All except
Smelophyllum capense have dry seeds which do not appear
to be readily dispersed. It is assumed that these species
have evolved in this region. It is suspected that they formed
part of specific vegetation units but became separated and
isolated to a lesser or greater degree as a result of their
poor dispersability and sensitivity to frequent fires.
The distribution of Virgilia (Van Wyk 1986) corre-
sponds with the distribution pattern of the subtropical for-
est species which expanded during the Oligocene-
Miocene. It is suggested that V. divaricata was the parent
species from which the other species evolved because of
its presence in both the inland and coastal forests. Its ab-
sence from Rooiberg but presence in Kamanassie suggests
that the species became established at a relatively late
stage of expansion of subtropical forest. Its crossing of
the gap north of the Keurbooms River towards the
Kamanassie can perhaps be explained by dispersal of the
resistant seeds by primates, particularly the baboon {Papio
ursinus) and Vervet monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops).
Both these primates have been seen in stands of Acacia
karroo and the alien wattle A. mearnsii which have seeds
very similar to V. divaricata. Seeds of V. divaricata have
been found in the faeces of the baboon in the coastal
mountains. Van Wyk (1986) mentioned two forms of the
species: a form of drier localities such as in Seweweek-
spoort, Baviaanskloof and Groendal; and the form of the
coastal forests between Humansdorp and George. In the
context of the spread of the species I consider the form
of drier localities as the first stage and the form of the
coastal forest as the second stage.
Lachnostylis bilocularis was recorded in the Rooiberg
and Meiringspoort but it also occurs in various localities
between Ladismith and Uniondale (Palmer & Pitman
1972). In Meiringspoort the tree grows in the southern
part of the gorge up to a particularly narrow part of the
gorge but does not occur north of it. Its distribution sug-
gests that it was more widespread before. The related L.
hirta occurs in the coastal forests over a somewhat wider
range (Palmer & Pitman 1972). It is suggested that L
hirta spanned the Gouritz River valley during less arid
periods of the Oligocene-Miocene with a wider distribu-
tion in the dry, forested coastal areas. L. bilocularis
evolved inland as an adaptation to dry, open sites and
eventually became limited to the present localities when
the lowlands became even drier. Both species have dry
seeds in dry capsules and are poorly dispersed. Calpurnia
villosa has a similar but more restricted distribution than
L. bilocularis, which also centres on the Gouritz River
and its tributaries in the Oudtshoorn basin (Palmer & Pit-
man 1972). The record of C. villosa from Grootrivierpoort
could be based on my misidentification in the field of C.
aurea, a species which has a disjunct distribution along
the coast (Geldenhuys 1992a).
6 CONCLUSIONS
The systematic survey of forests in the inland mountain
ranges in relation to the geomorphological evolution of dis-
persal corridors which link them with the coastal forests has
provided a means to postulate relative dates for the expansion
and contraction of floristic elements of both the inland and
coastal forests. However, certain assumptions made in this
study require to be verified, such as the following;
Bothalia27,l (1997)
69
• Dispersal distances by wind of the small, dry seeds
of Cunonia capensis and Nuxia floribunda.
• Flight patterns of ffugivorous birds between the coastal
and inland forests, and the feeding behaviour of these birds.
• The phylogenetic relationships of species of genera
such as Lachnostylis and Virgilia, and of provenances of
several other species such as Ilex mitis and the Podocar-
pus species.
Disturbance regimes in the study area have changed
over time. The current man-induced disturbances of the
vegetation exert extreme pressures on the forests which
persisted in refuge sites in marginal environments. The
forest patches should be treated as rare ‘species’ to allow
the natural processes of population migration, settlement
and adaptation to continue. The following examples of
changed management could provide the required protec-
tion to these forests:
• Burning patterns during controlled block bums in
catchments which contain forest patches should be recon-
sidered. The forests should not be used as fire breaks as
has been done in several cases. Fires should be burnt down
the slopes as would occur with natural fires (Geldenhuys
1994) and not from the bottom of the valleys upwards.
• Smaller alluvial sites along the rivers and the area
surrounding the exit of streams from the mountains should
not be cultivated, grazed or burnt.
7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study formed part of the activities of the Pro-
gramme for Natural Resources and Rural Development of
the Division of Water, Environment and Forestry Tech-
nology, CSIR. It was funded by the Department of Water
Affairs and Forestry (Forestry Branch). These activities
formed part of a Ph.D. study under supervision of Prof.
E.J. Moll, formerly of the Department of Botany, Univer-
sity of Cape Town. Several colleagues assisted during the
sampling of the forest patches in often very difficult ter-
rain: R. Bartholomew, M.J. Cameron, T. Hoekstra, H.J.
Homann, J.H. Koen, H. Kotze, A. Meyer, C.M. van den
Berg, C.J. van der Merwe, J.P.L. van der Walt, M. Viviers
and J.H.J. Vlok. Mr J. Dobson prepared the map of the
study area.
8 REFERENCES
ACOCKS, J.RH. 1988. Veld types of South Africa, 3rd edn. Memoirs of
the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 57.
ANON. 1987. Forest map of southern Africa. Forest Biome Project Na-
tional Programme for Environmental Sciences, FRD, Pretoria.
ARNOLD, T.H. & DE WET, B.C. (eds) 1993. Plants of southern Africa:
names and distribution. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South
Africa No. 62. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria.
AXELROD, D.I. & RAVEN, PH. 1978. Late Cretaceous and Tertiary
vegetation history of Africa. In M.J. A. Werger, Biogeography and
ecology of southern Africa: 77-130. Junk, The Hague,
BOND, W. 1981. Vegetation gradients in southern Cape mountains.
M.Sc. thesis. University of Cape Town, Rondebosch.
BOND, W.J., MIDGLEY, J. & VLOK, J. 1988. When is an island not an
island? Insular effects and their causes in fynbos shrublands.
Oecologiall: 5l5-52\.
BROWN, J.H. & GIBSON, A.C. 1983. Biogeography. Mosby, St Louis.
BRUMMITT, R.K. & POWELL, C.E. (eds) 1992. Authors of plant names.
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
CHAPMAN, J.D. & WHITE, F. 1970. The evergreen forests of Malawi.
Commonwealth Forestry Institute, Oxford.
COATES PALGRAVE, K. 1977. Trees of southern Africa. Stmik, Cape Town.
COETZEE, J.A. 1986. Palynological evidence for major vegetation and
climatic change in the Miocene and Pliocene of the southwestern
Cape. South African Jourrml of Science 82; 71, 72.
COWLING, R.M. 1984. A syntaxonomic and synecological study in the
Humansdorp region of the Fynbos Biome. Bothalia 15: 175-227.
DEACON, H.J. 1983. The comparative evolution of Mediterranean-type
ecosystems: a southern perspective. In E.J. Kruger, D.T. Mitchell
& J.U.M. Jarvis, Mediterranean-type ecosystems — the role of nu-
trients: 3-40. Ecological Studies 43. Springer- Verlag, Berlin.
DEACON, H.J., SCHOLTZ, A. & DAITZ, L.D. 1983. Fossil charcoals as
a source of palaeoecological information in the lynbos region. In
H.J. Deacon, Q.B. Hendy & J.J.N. Lambrechts, Fynbos palaeoe-
cology: a preliminary synthesis : 174-182. South African National
Scientific Programmes Report No. 74. CSIR, Pretoria.
DOWSETT-LEMAIRE, F. 1988. The forest vegetation of Mt Mulanje
(Malawi): a floristic and chorological study along an altitudinal
gradient (650-1950 m). Bulletin du Jardin botanique nationale de
Belgique 58: 77-107.
EVERARD, D.A. 1987. A classification of the subtropical transitional
thicket in the eastern Cape, based on syntaxonomic and structural
attributes. South African Journal of Botany 53: 329-340.
GELDENHUYS, C.J. 1975. Raising indigenous trees. Pamphlet No. 150.
Department of Forestry, Pretoria.
GELDENHUYS, C.J. 1980. The elfects of management for timber pro-
duction on floristics and growing stock in the southern Cape
indigenous forests. South African Forestry Journal 113: 6-15, 25.
GELDENHUYS, C.J. 1986. Nature’s valley: a refugium for rare southern
Cape forest species. Fa/aeoeco/ogy o/A/nca 17: 173-181.
GELDENHUYS, C.J. 1992a. Disjunctions and distribution limits of for-
est species in the southern Cape. South African Forestry Journal
161: 1-13.
GELDENHUYS, C.J. 1992b. Richness, composition and relationships of
the floras of selected forests in southern Africa. Bothalia 22:
205-233.
GELDENHUYS, C.J. 1993a. Floristic composition of the southern Cape
forest flora with an annotated checklist. South African Journal of
Botany 59: 26-44.
GELDENHUYS, C.J. 1993b. Reproductive biology and population
structures of Podocarpus falcatus and P. latifolius in southern
Cape forests. Botanical Journal ofLinnean Society 112: 59-74.
GELDENHUYS, C.J. 1994. Bergwind fires and the location pattern of
forest patches in the southern Cape landscape. South Africa.
Journal of Biogeography 21: 49-62.
GELDENHUYS, C.J. 1996. Fruit/seed characteristics and germimition
requirements of tree and shrub species of the southern Cape
forests. Report FOR-DEA 954, Division of Forest Science and
Technology. CSIR, Pretoria.
GELDENHUYS, C.J., KNIGHT, R.S., RUSSELL, S. & JARMAN, M.L,
(eds) 1988. Dictionary of fore. st structural terminology. South
African National Scientific Programmes Report No. 147. FRD,
Pretoria.
GIVNISH, T.J. 1980. Ecological constraints on the evolution of breeding
systems in seed plants: dioecy and dispersal in gymnosperms.
Evolution 34: 959-972.
HENDEY, Q.B. 1983. Cenozoic geology and palaeogeography of the
fynbos region. In H.J. Deacon, Q.B. Hendy & J.J.N. Lambrechts,
Fynbos palaeoecology: a prelimimtry synthesis: 35-60. South
African National Scientific Programmes Report No. 74. CSIR,
Pretoria.
KAUL, R.B., KANTAK, G.E. & CHURCHE.L, S.P 1988. The Niobrara
River Valley, a postglacial migration corridor and refugium of
forest plants and animals in the grasslands of central North Amer-
ica. The Botanical Review 54: 44—8 1 .
KILLICK, D.J.B. 1963. An account of the plant ecology of the Cathedral
Peak area of the Natal Drakensberg. Memoirs of the Botanical
Survey of South Africa No. 34.
LENZ, C.J. 1957. The river evolution and the remnants of the Tertiary
surfaces in the western Little Karoo. Annals of the University of
Stellenbosch No. 33; 197-234.
LEVYNS, M R. 1964. Migrations and origin of the Cape flora. Transac-
tions of the Royal Society of South Africa 37: 85-107.
LUCKHOFF, H.A. 1963. Die Baviaanskloof- of Willowmore-seder Wid-
dringtonia schwarzii (Marl.)Mast. Forestry in South Africa 3: 1-14.
MAC ARTHUR, R.H. & WILSON, E.O. 1967. The theory of island
biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
McKENZIE, B. 1978. A quantitative and qualitative study of the indige-
nous forests of the southwestern Cape. M.Sc. thesis. University of
Cape Town, Rondebosch.
70
Bothalia27,l (1997)
MOORE, A.E. 1988. Plant distribution and the evolution of the major
river systems in southern Africa. South African Journal of Geol-
ogy 91: 346-349.
PALMER, E. & PITMAN, N. 1972. Trees of southern Africa. Balkema,
Cape Town.
PHILLIPS, J.F.V. 1926. Virgilia capensis Lamb. (Keurboom): a contribu-
tion to its ecology and sylviculture. South African Journal of
Science 23; 435^54.
PHILLIPS, J.F.V. 1927. The role of the bush dove Columba arquatrix T
& K in fruit dispersal in the Knysna forests. South African Journal
of Science 24: 435—440.
PHILLIPS, J.F.V. 1931. Forest succession and ecology in the Knysna
region. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 14.
SCHOLTZ, A. 1986. Palynological and palaeobotanical studies in the
southern Cape. M.A. thesis. University of Stellenbosch, Stellen-
bosch.
SKELTON, P.H. 1986. Distribution patterns and biogeography of non-
tropical southern African freshwater fishes. Palaeoecology in Af-
rica 17:211-230.
SMITH, J.M. B 1981. Colonist ability, altitudinal range and origins of Mt
Field, Tasmania. Journal of Biogeography 8: 249-261.
STSC 1986. Statgraphics — statistical graphics system. Users guide. Sta-
tistical Graphics Corporation, Rockville, Maryland.
TAYLOR, H.C. 1979. Observations on the flora and phytogeography of
Rooiberg, a dry fynbos mountain in the southern Cape Province,
South Africa. Phytocoenologia 6: 524-531.
THERON, J.N. 1962. An analysis of the Cape Folding in the district of
Willowmore, C.P. Annals of the University of Stellenbosch 37A:
347-419.
TOERIEN, D.K. 1979. The geology of the Oudtshoom area. Explanation
to sheet 3322, scale 1 :250 000. Government Printer, Pretoria.
VAN WYK, B.-E. 1986. A revision of the genus Virgilia. South African
Journal of Botany 52: 347-353.
VLOK, J.H.J. & DE RONDE, C. 1989. The effect of low intensity fires
on forest floor vegetation in mature Pinus elliottii plantations in
the Tsitsikamma. South African Journal of Botany 55: 11-16.
VON BREITENBACH, F. 1986. National list of indigenous trees. Den-
drological Foundation, Pretoria.
WEATHER BUREAU 1986. Climate of South Africa. WB40, Depart-
ment of Environment Affairs, Pretoria.
APPENDIX. SPECIES LIST FOR FORESTS IN INLAND MOUNTAINS OF THE SOUTHERN CAPE
The forest sites are as follows;
Rooiberg: 1 , Bosrivier upper; 2, Bosrivier lower; 3, Assegaaibosrivier
Kamanassie: 4, Kluesrivier; 5, Meulrivier upper
Swartberg: 6, Waterkloof; 7, Seweweekspoort; 8, Swartbergpoort (Prins Albert); 9, Swartberg Pass (hotel site); 10, Rust-en-Vrede; 11, Huisrivier
upper; 12, Meiringspoort; 13, Tierkloof; 14, Cheridouwspoort
Kouga-Baviaanskloof: 15, Sapreerivier; 16, Doringkloof; 17, Bosrug; 18, Geelhoutbos; 19, Assegaaikloof; 20, Witrivier upper; 21, Witrivier lower;
22, Grootrivierpoort
Groendal: 23, Zungarivier (Chase’s kloof)
Forest site
Species Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Canopy and subcanopy tree species
Acacia karroo Hayne
Allophylus decipiens (Sond.) Radik.
Apodytes dimidiataE.A/ey. exArn.
Atalaya capensis R.A.Dyer
Brachylaena glabra (L.f.j Druce
Buddleja saligna Willd.
Calodendrum capense (L.f) Thunb.
Canthium
ciliatum (Klotzsch) Kuntze
inerme (L.f. ) Kuntze
mundianum Cham. & Schlechtd.
pauciflorum (Klotzsch) Kuntze
Cassine
aethiopica Thunb.
eucleiformis (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Kuntze
papillosa (Hochst.) Kuntze
peragua L.
Celtis africana Burm.f.
Chionanthus foveolata (E.Mey.) Steam
Clausena anisata (Willd.) Hook.f ex Benth.
Cunonia capensis L.
Curtisia dentata (Burm.f) C.A.Sm.
Cussonia
paniculata Eckl. & Zeyh.
spicata Thunb.
Diospyros
dichrophylla (Gand.) De Winter
whyteana (Hiern) F. White
Ekebergia capensis Sparrm.
Euclea
racemosa Murray
schimperi (A. DC.) Dandy var. schimperi
undulata Thunb.
6
9
4
1
4
7
2
2
6
2
I
3
1
1
9
7
2
3
16
7
4
14
• 13
• 6
• 3
2
1
7
Bothalia27,l (1997)
71
Species
Eugenia zeyheri Harv.
Ficus sur Forssk.
Gonioma kamassi E.Mey.
Halleria lucida L.
Heteromorphatrifoliata (Wendl.) Eckl. & Zeyh.
Hippobromus pauciflorus {L. f.) Radik.
Ilex mitis (L. j Radik.
Kiggelaria afiricana L.
Loxostylis alata Spreng.f. ex Rchb.
Maytenus
acuminata (L.f.) Loes.
nemorosa (Eckl. i& Zeyh.) Marais
oleoides (Lam.) Loes.
peduncularis (Sand.) Loes.
undata (Thunb.) Blake lock
Nuxia floribunda Benth.
Ochna arborea Burch, ex DC.
Ocotea bullata (Burch.) Baill.
Olea
capensis L.
subsp. capensis
subsp. macrocarpa ( C.H. Wr ) I. Verd.
europaea L. subsp. africana (Mill.) RS.Green
Olinia ventosa (L.) Cufod.
Pappea capensis Eckl. & Zeyh.
Pittosporum viridiflorum Sims
Pleurostylia capensis (Turcz.) Oliv.
Podocarpus
falcatus (Thunb.) R.Br. ex Mirb.
latifolius (Thunb.) R.Br. ex Mirb.
Psydrax obovata ( Eckl. & Zeyh. ) Bridson
Ptaeroxylon obliquum (Thunb.) Radik.
Pterocelastrus
rostratus Walp.
tricuspidatus (Lam.) Sond.
Rapanea melanophloeos (L.) Mez
Rhus
chirindensis Baker f.
lancea L.f.
lucida L.
Rothmannia capensis Thunb.
Schotia latifolia Jacq.
Scolopia
mundii (Eckl. &Zeyh.) Warb.
zeyheri (Nees) Harv.
Sideroxylon inerme L.
Smelophyllum capense (Sond.) Radik.
Sterculia alexandri Harv.
Strychnos decussata (Pappe) Gilg
Tarchonanthus camphoratus L.
Teclea natalensis (Sond.) Engl.
Vepris lanceolata (Lam.) G.Don
Virgilia divaricata Adamson
Widdringtonia schwarzii (Marloth) Mast.
Zanthoxylum capense (Thunb.) Harv.
Shrubs
Acokanthera oppositifolia (Lam.) Codd
Azima tetracantha Lam.
Brachylaena neriifolia (L.) R.Br.
Buddleja
salviifolia (L.) Lam.
sp.
Calpumia villosa Harv.
Capparis sepiaria L. var. citrifolia (Lam.) Toelken
Carissa
bispinosa (L.) Desf. ex Brenan
haematocarpa (Eckl.) A.DC.
Cassine
parvifolia Sond.
reticulata (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Codd
tetragona (L.f) Loes.
Chaetacme aristata Planch.
Chrysanthemoides monilifera (L.) Norl.
Colpoon compressum P.J.Bergius
Forest site
72
Bothalia27,l (1997)
Species
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Forest site
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Total
Crotalaria capensis Jacq.
Diospyros
glabra (L.) De Winter
scabrida (Harv. ex Hiem) De Winter
Dovyalis rhamnoides (Burch, ex DC.) Harv.
Ehretia amoena Klotzsch
Euclea schimperi (A. DC.) Dandy var. daph-
noides (Hiem) De Winter
Ficus burtt-davyi Hutch.
Grewia occidentalis L.
Lachnostylis bilocularis R. A. Dyer
Laurophyllus capensis Thunb.
Maytenus
heterophylla (Eckl. & Zeyh.) N.Robson
mossambicensis (Klotzsch) Blake lock
Myrica serrata Lam.
Myrsine africana L.
Ochna serrulata (Hochst.) Walp.
Pavetta lanceolata Eckl.
Plumbago auriculata Lam.
Psoralea sp. cf. pinnata
Putterlickia pyracantha (L.) Szyszyl.
Rhamnus prinoides L’Her.
Rhus
glauca Thunb.
longispina Eckl. & Zeyh.
rehmanniana Engl.
sp. cf. refracta
Scutia myrtina (Burm.f.) Kurz
Trichocladus ellipticus Eckl. & Zeyh. ex Walp.
Widdringtonia nodiflora (L.) Powrie
Lianes and vines
Adenocline acuta (Thunb.) Baill.
Cissampelos torulosa E.Mey. ex Harv.
Clematis brachiata Thunb.
Coccinea palmata (Sond.) Cogn.
Cynanchum ellipticum (Harv.) R.A.Dyer
Dipogon lignosus (L.) Verde.
Kedrostis nana (Lam.) Cogn. var. schlechteri
( Cogn. } A.Meeuse
Microglossa mespilifolia (Less.) B.L.Rob.
Myrsiphyllum scandens (Thunb.) Oberm.
Oncinema lineare (L. f.) Bullock
Pelargonium sp.
Protasparagus
aethiopicus (L.) Oberm.
setaceus (Kunth) Oberm.
sp.
Rhoicissus
digitata (L.f.) Gilg & Brandt
tomentosa (Lam.) Wild & R.B.Drumm.
Rhynchosia caribaea (Jacq.) DC.
Rubus pinnatus Willd.
Rumex sagittatus Thunb.
Secamone
alpini Schult.
filiformis (L.f.) J.H.Ross
Senecio
angulatus L.f.
deltoideus Less.
quinquelobus (Thunb.) DC.
sp, 1
sp. 2
Thunbergia dregeana Nees
Tylophora lycioides (E.Mey.) Decne.
Zehneria scabra (L.f) Sond.
1
3
6
3
1
6
9
9
3
1
15
1
9
13
3
2
5
7
6
2
1
3
15
1
5
1
2
1
1
10
2
8
17
7
2
6
2
3
14
1
4
1
4
5
2
15
3
3
2
1
1
1
1
1
3
Ferns
Adiantum capillus-veneris L. --------- - 4
Asplenium
adiantum-nigrum L. var. solidum (Kunz.e)
J.P.Roux - 1
daWhopienm (Burm.f ) Bech. - g
lunulatum Sw. ----------------- • 4
BothaIia27,l (1997)
73
Species
Asplenium (cont.)
monanthes L,
protensum Schrad.
rutifolium (P.J.Bergius) Kunze
splendens Kunze
Blechnum
australe L
capense Burm.f.
attenuatum (Sw.) var. giganteum (Kaulf.) Bonap.
inflexum (Kunze) Kuhn
punctulatum Sw.
tabulare (Thunb.) Kuhn
Ceterach cordatum (Thunb.) Desv.
Cheilanthes
capensis (Thunb.) Sw.
hirta Sw.
multifida (Sw.) Sw.
viridis (Forssk.) Sw.
parviloba (Sw.) Sw.
Ctenitis lanuginosa (Willd. ex Kaulf.) Copel.
Cyathea capensis (L.f.)J.E.Sm.
Dryopteris callolepis C. Chr.
Elaphoglossum acrostichoides (Hook. & Grev.)
Schelpe
Gleichenia polypodioides (L.) J.E.Sm.
Histiopteris incisa (Thunb.) J.Sm.
Hypolepis sparsisora (Schrad.) Kuhn
Lycopodium gnidioides L.f.
Microsorium ensiforme (Thunb.) Schelpe
Osmunda regalis L.
Pellaea pteroides (L.) Brand
Pleopeltis macrocarpa (Bory ex Willd.) Kaulf.
Polystichum pungens (Kaulf.) Presl
Pteris dentata Eorssk.
Rumohra adiantiformis (G.Forst.) Ching
Thelypteris
bergiana (Schlechtd.) Ching
intemipta (W;7W.) K.lwats.
Todea barbara (L. ) T.Moore
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Geophytes and graminoids
Agapanthus sp.
Aristea ensifolia J.Muir
Carex aethiopica Schkuhr
Chlorophytum comosum (Thunb.) Jacq.
Commelina africana L. var. lancispatha
C.B. Clarke
Cyperus albostriatus Schrad.
Dietes iridioides (L.) Sweet ex Klatt
Disperis lindleyana Rchb.f.
Ehrharta
sp. cf. ramosa/gigantea
sp. 1
sp. 2
Ficinia sylvatica Kunth
Gladiolus robustus Goldblatt
Haemanthus albiflos Jacq.
Oplismenus hirtellus (L.) PBeauv.
Omithogalum longibracteata Jacq.
Panicum deustum Thunb.
Scadoxus puniceus (L.) Friis & Nordal
Schoenoxiphium
lanceum (Thunb.) Kuk.
lehmannii (Nees) Steud.
Stipa dregeana Steud.
Zantedeschia aethiopica (L.) Spreng.
Soft shrubs and forbs
Abutilon sonneratianum (Cav.) Sweet
Aloe sp.
Asparagus macowanii Baker
Cardamine africana L.
Centella erianthe (Rich.) Drude
Ceropegia sp.
8 9
Forest site
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Total
1
2
2
2
18
15
10
5
18
2
4
1
1
• 4
1
1
1
74
Bothalia27,l (1997)
Species
Clutia
natalensis Bernh.
pulchella L.
Crassula
nemorosa {Eckl. & Zeyh.) Endl. ex Walp.
pellucida L. subsp. marginalis (Dryand. in
Alton) Toelken
Cyrtorchis arcuata (Lindl.) Schltr.
Didymodoxa caffra (Thunb.) Friis & Wilmot-
Dear
Euphorbia kxaussiana Bernh.
Galium thunbergianum Eckl. & Zeyh.
Galopina circaeoides Thunb.
Gerbera cordata (Thunb.) Less.
Helichrysum petiolare Hilliard & B.L.Burtt
Hypoestes sp. cf. verticillatus
Isoglossa prolixa (Nees) Lindau
Jalropha capensis (L.f.) Sand.
Knowltonia vesicatoria (L.f. ) Sims subsp.
humilis H.Rasm.
Leidesia prochmbens (L.) Brain
Leonotis ocymifolia (Burm.f.) Iwarsson
Lobelia sp.
Nemesia mellissifolia Benth.
Oxalis incamata L.
Pavonia praemorsa (L.f. ) Cav.
Pelargonium
ribifolia Jacq.
scabroide Knuth
zonale (L.) L'Her.
Peperomia
retusa (L.f. ) A.Dietr.
tetraphylla (G.Forst.) Hook. & Arn.
Peucedanum sp.
Plectranthus verticillatus (L.f) Druce
Polygala myrtifolia L.
Solanum
giganteum Jacq.
retroflexum Dunal
tomentosum L.
Sp. cf. Acalypha
Stachys
aethiopicaL.
grandifolia E.Mey. ex Benth.
Streptocarpus rexii (Hook.) Lindl.
Zygophyllum morgsana L.
Forest site
Bothalia 27,1:75-82(1997)
Cytogenetic studies in some representatives of the subfamily Poddeae (Poaceae)
in South AMca. 3. The tribe Poeae
J.J. SPIES*, S.M.C. VAN WYK*, I.C. NIEMAN* and EJ.L. LIEBENBERG**
Keywords: basic chromosome numbers, chromosomes, meiosis, Poaceae, Poeae, polyploidy, Pooideae, South Africa
ABSTRACT
This is a report on chromosome numbers for the tribe Poeae, which is represented in South Africa mainly by naturalized
exotics. Chromosome numbers of 67 specimens, representing 26 species and 1 1 genera, are presented. These numbers include
the first reports on Poa binata Nees (n = 3x = 21 and n = 4x = 28), Puccinellia acroxantha C.A.Sm. & C.E.Hubb. (n = 3x = 21)
and P angusta (Nees) C.A.Sm. & C.E.Hubb. (n = x = 7). New ploidy levels are reported for Catapodium rigidum (L.) C.E.Hubb.
(n = 2x = 14), Festuca caprina Nees (n = 2x = 14) and F. scabra Vahl (n = x = 7).
INTRODUCTION
The first paper in this series indicated the importance
of determining the ploidy levels and basic chromosome
numbers of naturalized and endemic flora in South Africa
(Spies et al. 1996a). In the second paper chromosome
numbers of the rest of the tribe Aveninae were presented
(Spies et al. 1996b). This third paper in the series on chro-
mosome numbers of representatives of the subfamily
Pooideae in South Africa, is restricted to the tribe Poeae.
During this study we followed the classification system
of Gibbs Russell et al. (1990) for the tribal separation. There-
fore we did not recognize the tribe Hainardeae Greuter, and
all the species usually belonging to this small tribe are in-
cluded in the Poeae. The tribe Poeae consists, therefore, of
approximately 55 genera and more than 5000 species (Clay-
ton & Renvoize 1986). Most local species belonging to this
tribe are naturalized exotics. The Poeae are represented in
South Alfica by the genera Brizja. L., Catapodium Link,
Colpodium Trin., Cynosunis L., Dactylis L., Festuca L., Hai-
nardia Greuter, Lamarckia Moench, Folium L., Parapholis
C.E.Hubb., Poa L., Puccinellia Pari., Sphenopus Trin. and
Vulpia C.C.Gmel. (Gibbs Russell et al. 1990).
The aim of this study is to determine the chromosome
numbers, polyploid levels and meiotic chromosome be-
haviour of the South African representatives of the tribe
Poeae. These results will, eventually, be compared with
the results obtained from indigenous and endemic taxa to
compare the frequency of polyploidy between indigenous
and introduced grasses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
For the purpose of this study, cytogenetic material was
collected in two dilferent ways. The material was either
collected and fixed in the field, or living material was
collected in the field and transplanted in the nurseries of
* Department of Botany and Genetics, University of the Orange Free
State, RO. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300.
** National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XlOl, Pretoria 0001.
MS. received: 1996-08-07.
either the Department of Botany and Genetics, University
of the Orange Free State (Bloemfontein) or the National
Botanical Institute (Pretoria), where the cytogenetic ma-
terial was collected and fixed. The specimens used and
their localities are listed in Table 1. Voucher specimens
are housed either in the Geo Potts Herbarium, Department
of Botany and Genetics, University of the Orange Free
State, Bloemfontein (BLFU) or in the National Herbarium,
Pretoria (PRE).
Anthers were squashed in aceto-carmine and meioti-
cally analysed (Spies et al. 1996a). Chromosome numbers
are presented as haploid chromosome numbers to conform
to previous papers on chromosome numbers in this journal
(Spies & Du Plessis 1986a). Genome homology in some
tetraploid specimens was determined according to the
models described by Kimber & Alonso (1981).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Briza consists of 16 species, with three (B. maxima L.,
B. minor L. and B. subaristatum Lam.) being naturalized
in South Africa. Two of these species were studied. Both
were diploid with B. maxima having the haploid chromo-
some number seven (n = x = 7) and B. minor five (n -
X = 5) (Table 1). These findings confirm previous reports
on chromosome numbers for these species by Fedorov
1969; Ornduff 1967-1969; Moore 1970, 1971, 1972,
1974, 1977; Goldblatt 1981, 1983, 1985, 1988; Goldblatt
& Johnson 1990, 1991, 1994, who observed tetraploid
Briza specimens in several species. However, polyploidy
seems to be absent in both B. maxima and B. minor speci-
mens studied here and abroad. Meiosis was regular in both
species, and bivalents were formed (Figure lA & B).
TTiese results, in combination with the available chromo-
some numbers given in the literature consulted, indicate
that Briza has two basic chromosome numbers, namely
five and seven.
Catapodium consists of two species, one of which is
naturalized in South Africa [C. rigidum (L.) C.E.Hubb.].
Three of the studied specimens were diploid (n = x = 7),
whereas the other specimen was tetraploid (n = 2x = 14)
(Table 1). The diploid chromosome number observed sup-
76
Bothalia27,l (1997)
TABLE 1. — Haploid chromosome numbers of representatives of the tribe Poeae (Poaceae, Pooideae) in southern Africa with their voucher specimen
numbers and specific localities. Species are listed alphabetically, voucher numbers within a species numerically and the locality is presented
according to the system described by Edwards & Leistner (1971)
LocaUty
WESTERN CAPE.— 3218 (Clanwilliam): Versveld Pass, (-DC)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3421 (Riversdale): 4 km from Kweekkraal to Droerivier, (-AA)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): 19 km from Darling to Malmesbury, (-AD)
NORTHERN CAPE. — 3229 (Sutherland); 10 km from Sutherland to Matjiesfontein, (-BC)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3418 (Simonstown); Redhill, (-AB)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): Bothmaskloof, (-BC)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3420 (Bredasdorp); 4 km N of De Hoop Nature Reserve, (-AD)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3420 (Bredasdorp): 20 km from Bredasdorp to Spitskop, (-CA)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3420 (Bredasdorp): 6 km from Ouplaas to De Hoop Nature Reserve,
(-AD)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): 1 km south of old toll house in Mitchell’s Pass, (-AD)
WESTERN CAPE.— 3418 (Simonstown): Redhill, (-AB)
EASTERN CAPE. — 3228 (Butterworth); on beach at Bonza Bay, (-CC)
MPUMALANGA. — ^2530 (Lydenburg): 18 km from Lydenburg to Weltevreden, (-AB)
MPUMALANGA. — 2530 (Lydenburg): 6 km from Dullstroom to Goede Hoop, (-AC)
EASTERN CAPE. — 3028 (Matatiele): 47 km from Rhodes in Naude’s Neck, (-CC)
EASTERN CAPE. — 3027 (Barkly East): Beestekraal se loop, (-DC)
MPUMALANGA. — 2530 (Lydenburg): 16 km from Lydenburg to Sabie, (-BA)
MPUMALANGA. — 2530 (Lydenburg): 17 km from Lydenburg to Roossenekal, (-AB)
EASTERN CAPE. — 3424 (Humansdorp); 10 km from Humansdorp to Cape St Francis,
(-BB)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3421 (Riversdale): 25 km from Droerivier to Vermaaklikheid via
Oudemuragie, (-AC)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): 7 km from Villiersdorp to Franschhoek, (-CC)
EASTERN CAPE. — 3127 (Lady Frere): 9 km from Dordrecht to Barkly East, (-AC)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): 6 km from Franschhoek to Villiersdorp, (-CC)
WESTERN CAPE.— 3318 (Cape Town): 1 km east of Mamre Road, (-BC)
MPUMALANGA. — 2530 (Lydenburg): 14 km from Dullstroom to Lydenburg, (-AC)
EASTERN CAPE. — 3027 (Lady Grey): near Barkly East, (-DC)
FREE STATE.— 2826 (Brandfort): Glen, (-CD)
WESTERN CAPE.— 3318 (Cape Town): 1 km east of Mamre Road, (-BC)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): 8 km from Wellington to Worcester in Bains-
kloof, (-CA)
EASTERN CAPE. — 3325 (Port Elizabeth): King Neptune Beach, (-DC)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): Katbakkies tum-off on road between Ceres and
Citrusdal, (-AB)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3217 (Vredenburg): on beach outside Cape Columbine Nature
Reserve, (-DD)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): 1 km east of Mamre Road, (-BC)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3017 (Hondeklipbaai): dunes at Groenrivier Mouth, (-DC)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): 7 km from Yzerfontein to Darling, (-AC)
WESTERN CAPE. — 33 1 8 (Cape Town); 5 km from Langebaan to Langebaanweg, (-DC)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3320 (Montagu): 22 km from Villiersdorp to Worcester via Koppies,
(-AD)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3420 (Bredasdorp); De Hoop Nature Reserve, (-AD)
EASTERN CAPE. — 3027 (Lady Grey): 34 km from Rhodes to Lundean’s Neck, (-DD)
FREE STATE — 2729 (Volksrust): Verkykerskop, (-CC)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3218 (Clanwilliam); 5 km south of Elandsbaai, (-AB)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town ): 1 km north of Uilekraal on road between
Hopefield and Darling, (-AB)
EASTERN CAPE. — 3424 (Humansdorp): 10 km from Humansdorp to Cape St Francis, (-BB)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3320 (Montagu): 22 km from Villiersdorp to Worcester via Koppies, (-AD)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): 2 km from Doombaai to Donkinbaai, (-CB)
MPUMALANGA. — 2530 (Lydenburg): 39 km from Lydenburg to Roossenekal, (-AA)
WESTERN CAPE.— 3318 (Cape Town): 1 km east of Mamre Road, (-BC)
MPUMALANGA. — 2530 (Lydenburg): 6 km from Goede Hoop to Dullstroom, (-AC)
EASTERN CAPE. — 3028 (Matatiele): 12 km from Rhodes in Naudesnek, (-CC)
NORTHERN CAPE. — 3017 (Hondeklipbaai); 6 km from Kamieskroon in Kamiesberg Pass,
(-BB)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): Afrikaanse taal memorial, (-DD)
NORTHERN CAPE. — 3119 (Calvinia): 20 km from Calvinia to Loeriesfontein, (-AB)
NORTHERN CAPE. — 3220 (Sutherland); 2 km from Sutherland to Calvinia, (-BC)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): Tinie Versveld Nature Reserve, (-AD)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3218 (Clanwilliam): 5 km south of Bobbejaanberg Point, Elands-
baai, (-AD)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3318 (Cape Town): 10 km from Wellington to Porterville, (-DB)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): Katbakkies tum-off on road between Ceres and
Citrusdal, (-AB)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3218 (Clanwilliam): 5 km south of Eland’s Bay, (-AB)
NORTHERN CAPE. — 3018 (Kamiesberg): 16 km east of Kamieskroon, (-AC)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): 4 km to Franschhoek from tum-off on Villiersdorp-
Grabouw road, (-CC)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3418 (Simonstown): Silvermine Nature Reserve, (-AB)
EASTERN CAPE. — 3027 (Lady Grey): 45 km from Barkly East to Rhodes, (-DD)
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): Katbakkies tum-off on road between Ceres and
Citmsdal, (-AB)
NORTHERN CAPE. — 3018 (Kamiesberg): 21 km from Kamieskroon to Gamoep, (-AC)
Bothalia27,l (1997)
77
ports the previous numbers recorded by various authors
(TFedorov 1969; Omduff 1967-1969; Moore 1970, 1971,
1972, 1974, 1977; Goldblatt 1981, 1983, 1985, 1988;
Goldblatt & Johnson 1990, 1991, 1994). To the best of
our knowledge, the tetraploid number observed is a new
ploidy level for C. rigidum. Tetraploid specimens have,
however, been observed in the other Catapodium species.
Both ploidy levels studied, formed bivalents only (Figure
1C & D) and meiosis was normal. This indicates that the
tetraploid specimen may be of alloploid origin.
FIGURE 1. — Photomicrographs of
meiotic chromosomes in the
genera Briza and Catapodium.
A, B. maxima. Spies 4420,
diakinesis with 7n; B, B. minor.
Spies 4425, diakinesis with 5ii;
C, C. rigidum. Spies 3854,
diakinesis with 7n; D, C.
rigidum. Spies 3451, metaphase
I with 14n. Scale bars: 10 |itm.
In this study the alloploid origin of the tetraploid C.
rigidum specimen is supported by its genome constitution
analysis, in which the observed chromosome associations
concurred best with the associations expected for the 2:2
model of Kimber & Alonso (1981) (Table 2). This model
indicates that two sets of genomes are present (two
genomes per set) and the relative similarity between the
genomes within a set is 0.5. The relative similarity be-
tween sets of genomes is expressed by an x-value that
may vary between 0.5 (differences between sets are simi-
TABLE 2. — Genomic relationships in some tetraploid representatives of the tribe Poeae (Poaceae, Pooideae) in southern Africa according to the
models of Kimber & Alonso (1981). The number in square brackets indicates the relative affinity of the different genomes
78
Bothalia27,l (1997)
lar to the differences within a set, therefore the genomes
may be presented in the form of AAAA) and 1 (sets dif-
fering greatly, therefore the genomes may be presented as
AABB). The x-value for the tetraploid Cl rigidum speci-
men is almost 1 (Table 2) and, therefore, very little to no
homology exists between the two chromosome sets
(genomes may be presented by AAA’ A, where A differs
greatly from A’).
Colpodium contains three species, with C. hedbergii
(Melderis) Tzvelev being indigenous to this country. This
species was not included in this study. However, chromo-
some numbers of 2n = 4, 8, 14 and 28 have been reported
for the genus Colpodium (Ornduff 1967-1969; Moore
1970, 1971, 1972, 1974, 1977; Goldblatt 1981, 1983,
1985, 1988; Goldblatt & Johnson 1990, 1991, 1994), and
2n = 8 for C. hedbergii (Hedberg & Hedberg 1977). Fur-
ther studies are necessary to determine the basic chromo-
some number of this genus and also to determine the
phylogenetic development of chromosome numbers.
Cvnosurus has eight species worldwide, with C. col-
oratu^ Lehm. ex Nees being a very rare indigenous spe-
cies and C. echinatus L. a naturalized species. Neither of
these species was included in this study. Chromosome
number reports indicate that all species studied are diploid
and C. echinatus was included in some of those studies
(Ornduff 1967-1969; Moore 1970, 1971, 1972, 1974,
1977; Goldblatt 1981, 1983, 1985, 1988; Goldblatt &
Johnson 1990, 1991, 1994).
Dactylis is represented in South Africa by one natural-
ized species {D. glomerata L.). The specimen of D. glom-
erata studied, was diploid (Table 1). This finding supports
the various chromosome number reports of 2n = 14 or 28
for D. glomerata, as well as for the genus Dactylis in
general (Fedorov 1969; Ornduff 1967-1969; Moore 1970,
1971, 1972, 1974, 1977; Goldblatt 1981, 1983, 1985,
1988; Goldblatt & Johnson 1990, 1991, 1994).
Festuca has approximately 360 species worldwide and
is represented by eight indigenous species: F. africana
(Hack.) Clayton, F caprina Nees, F costata Nees, F. dra-
comontana H.P.Linder, F. killickii Kenn. -O’Byrne, F
longipes Stapf, F scabra Vahl and F vulpioides Steud.,
and one naturalized species: F elatior L. ( = F arundi-
nacea). Four Festuca species were included in this study.
They were all found to be tetraploid except for one of the
seven specimens of F scabra, which was diploid (Table
1 ). In this study the tetraploid chromosome numbers (n =
2x = 14) were observed for F caprina; this represents a
new ploidy level for this species. Previous reports gave
an octoploid number (n = 4x = 28) for this species (Spies
& Du Plessis 1986a, b). This study confirms a tetraploid
chromosome number (n = 2x = 14) for F costata (De Wet
1958). The tetraploid number (n = 2x = 14) for F elatior
is in support of one of the ploidy levels previously de-
scribed for this species, namely 2n = 14, 28, 42, 56 and
70 (Fedorov 1969; Ornduff 1967-1969; Moore 1970,
1971, 1972, 1974, 1977; Goldblatt 1981, 1983, 1985,
1988; Goldblatt & Johnson 1990, 1991, 1994). Festuca
longipes was not included in this study but Hill (1965)
reported a hexaploid number for this species. This is the
first study to report a diploid chromosome number for F.
scabra. The tetraploid number observed confirms the level
previously reported with nonaploid and decaploid num-
bers (De Wet & Anderson 1956; De Wet 1958; Spies &
Du Plessis 1986a, b). The chromosome numbers of four
South African species of Festuca are still unknown, i.e.
F. africana, F dracomontana, F killickii and F. vulpioides.
Meiosis was normal in most specimens, with only bi-
valents being formed (Figure 2), excepting a telophase I
cell with four micronuclei in F. costata (Figure 2C) and
a telophase II cell in one F. scabra specimen. Spies 3962,
with a micronucleus and the possible remnants of an ana-
phase II bridge (Figure 2E). This low frequency of abnor-
malities (less than one cell in the forty cells studied per
specimen), may be attributed to accidental misdivisions.
The presence of only bivalents found in the tetraploid
specimens of F. caprina (Figure 2A), F. costata (Figure
2B), F. elatior and F. scabra (Figure 2D), suggests that
these species have alloploid origins.
FIGURE 2. — Photomicrographs of
meiotic chromosomes in the ge-
nus Festuca. A, F. caprina,
Saayman 1 16, diakinesis with
14ii. B, C, F. costata. Spies
4692: B, metaphase 1 with 14n;
C, telophase I with four micro-
nuclei. D, E, F. scabra: D, Saay-
man 99, diakinesis with 14ii; E,
Spies 3962, telophase II with
micronucleus and possible rem-
nant of anaphase II bridge.
Scale bars: 10 pm.
BothaJia27,l (1997)
79
FIGURE 3. — Photomicrographs of meiotic chromosomes in the genus Lolium. A, L rigidum. Spies 3190, diakinesis with 7ii; B, L. perenne x L.
multiflorum. Spies 2463, metaphase I with 7ii; C, L. multiflorum. Spies 4428, anaphase 1 with 4 laggards. D-G, L. temulentum: D, Spies 4567,
metaphase I with 7n + IB; E, Spies 4637, diplotene with 7n; F, Spies 4637, diakinesis with 14n; G, Spies 4569, anaphase 1 with chromatin
strand connecting two segregating chromosomes. H, I, Lolium sp.. Spies 5062: H, anaphase II with four laggards; I, telophase 11 with two
micronuclei. Scale bars; 10 pm.
Genome analyses of all tetraploid Festuca specimens
indicated that, in each case, the observed chromosome
associations concurred best with the expected associations
for the 2:2 model (Table 2). The x-values varied from
0.95 to 1 and the analysed specimens of all four species
suggest an alloploid origin (Table 2).
Hainardia is a monotypic genus, and H. cylindrica
(Willd.) Greuter is naturalized in this country. We ob-
served a diploid chromosome number of n = x = 7 in this
species (Table 1). This number deviates from the 2n = 26
given in the literature (Scrugli & Bocchieri 1977, men-
tioned in Goldblatt 1981). Further studies of this ex-
tremely rare species are necessary to determine its basic
chromosome number and the possible evolutionary
change from x = 7 to x = 13.
Lamarckia aurea (L.) Moench represents another
monotypic naturalized genus in South Africa. No suitable
material of this species could be obtained for this study.
All the published chromosome numbers given agree that
the species is diploid (2n = 2\ - 14) (Fedorov 1969;
Moore 1970, 1971, 1972, 1974, 1977; Goldblatt 1988;
Goldblatt & Johnson 1994).
Four species of the genus Lolium are naturalized in
South Africa, i.e. L. multiflorum Lam., L. perenne L., L.
rigidum Gaudin and L. temulentum L. All four species
were studied and were all diploid (Figure 3A, B, D & E),
thus confirming previous chromosome number reports
(Fedorov 1969; Ornduff 1967-1969; Moore 1970, 1971,
1972, 1974, 1977; Goldblatt 1981, 1983, 1985, 1988;
Goldblatt & Johnson 1990, 1991, 1994). A single
tetraploid cell was observed in a L. temulentum specimen
(Figure 3F). This tetraploid cell may be attributed to cell
fusion (Spies & Van Wyk 1995). A few meiotic abnor-
malities were observed. They include anaphase I laggards
(Figure 3C), the presence of B-chromosomes (Figure 3D),
an anaphase I bridge (Figure 3G), anaphase II laggards
(Figure 3H) and telophase II micronuclei (Figure 31).
The genus Parapholis comprises six species, but only
P. incurva (L.) C.E.Hubb. is locally naturalized. Eive
specimens were included in this study (Table 1). With a
80
Bothalia27,l (1997)
FIGURE 4. — Photomicrographs of
meiotic chromosomes in Para-
pholis incurva. A, Spies 5349,
metaphase I with 19n. B-E,
Spies 4596: B, anaphase I with
18-18 segregation of chromo-
somes; C, anaphase I with chro-
mosome laggards; D, anaphase
I with chromatid bridge; E, te-
lophase I with four micronuclei.
Scale bars: 10 pm.
basic chromosome number of 7, two specimens were dip-
loid (n = X = 7), two aneuploid (n = 18 and n = 19)
(Figure 4A & B), and one hexaploid (n = 3x = 21). These
conflicting chromosome numbers are accentuated by
the literature consulted, where 2n = 24 (Goldblatt &
Johnson 1994), 28 (Moore 1977), 36 (Fedorov 1969;
Moore 1972; Goldblatt 1981), 38 (Fedorov 1969; Moore
1972; Goldblatt 1981) and 42 (Fedorov 1969) are found
for P. incurva. Other Parapholis species are either diploid
(2n = 14) (Fedorov 1969) or tetraploid (2n = 28) (Moore
1972). Further studies in P incurva are needed to deter-
mine the evolution of chromosome numbers.
Meiosis was relatively normal and abnormalities were only
observed in the aneuploid specimens (Figure 4). These abnor-
malities include chromosome laggards during anaphase I
(Figure 4C), a chromatid bridge during anaphase I (Figure
4D) and micronuclei during telophase I (Figure 4E).
FIGURE 5. — Photomicrographs of meiotic chromosomes in the genus Poa. A, B, P. binata, Saayman 1 17, diakinesis with 21n. C-G, P. pratensis:
C, Spies 4670, diakinesis; D, Spies 4670, metaphase I with several univalents; E, Spies 3196, anaphase 1 with laggards; F, Spies 4720, anaphase
1 with laggards; G, Spies 4720, telophase 1 with micronucleus. Scale bars: 10 pm.
Bothalia27,l (1997)
FIGURE 6. — Photomicrographs of meiotic chromo-
somes in the genus Puccinellia. A, B, P.
acroxantha: A, Spies 3126, diakinesis with
21ii; B, Spies 3134, metaphase I with various
univalents. C, P. angusta. Spies 3157a, diaki-
nesis with 7ii; D, Puccinnellia sp., Spies 3154,
diakinesis with 1\\ + IB; E, P. angusta. Spies
3157a, anaphase I with a chromosome bridge
and either a B-chromosome or fragment in
upper pole (see arrows). Scale bars: 10 pm.
The largest genus in the Poeae, Poa, consists of approxi-
mately 500 species, with three indigenous species {P. biiiata
Nees, P. bulbosa L. and P leptoclada A.Rich.) and three
naturalized species (P annua L., P pratensis L. and P. tri-
valvis L.). Four of these sptecies were studied. The P. annua
specimens were tetraploid, P. binata had one hexaploid (Fig-
ure 5A & B) and one octoploid sptecimen, whereas all the
P. bulbosa and P pratensis sftecimens were hexaploid (Figure
5C). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on
chromosome numbers for P. binata. The rest of our chro-
mosome number reports support the previous counts made
for P. annua, P bulbosa, P. pratensis and P. trivalvis.
Meiosis was abnormal in the P pratensis specimen
(n = 21). These abnormalities included numerous univa-
lents during metaphase I (Figure 5D), chromosome lag-
gards during anaphase I (Figure 5E & F) and micronuclei
during telophase I (Figure 5G).
There are ± 80 species in the genus Puccinellia, with
three indigenous species, P. acroxantha C.A.Sm. &
C.E.Hubb., P. angusta (Nees) C.A.Sm. & C.E.Hubb. and
P fasciculata (Torr.) C.Bicknell; and a naturalized species
P. distans (L.) Pari. The Puccinellia acroxantha specimens
were hexaploid (Figure 6A) and the P angusta specimen
was diploid (Figure 6C & D). These are thought to be the
first reports on chromosome numbers for both species. A
metaphase I cell with many univalents was observed (Fig-
ure 6B) in one P. acroxantha specimen. One B-chromo-
some was present in some cells of P angusta (Figure 6D)
and a chromosome bridge was observed in one cell of
this species (Figure 6E).
1 ^ *
B
D
i
10^
82
Bothalia27,l (1997)
The genus Sphenopus contains two species, with only
S. divaricatus being naturalized in South Africa. Both S.
divaricatus specimens were diploid with n = x = 7. This
finding contradicts the previous numbers based on six as
listed in Moore 1972 & 1974 and Goldblatt 1981, and
supports the 2n = 28 listed in Moore 1972 & 1974.
Four of the 23 species of the genus Vidpia are natu-
ralized in South Africa, i.e. V. bwmoides (L.) Gray, V.
fasciculata (Forssk.) Samp., V. muralis (Kunth) Nees and
V myuros (L.) C.C.Gmel, One Vidpia bwmoides specimen
was diploid, the other was hexaploid (Figure 7 A), V. fas-
ciculata was tetraploid and V. muralis (Figure 7C) and V.
myuros (Figure 7D) were hexaploid. These numbers con-
firm the previous reported findings (Fedorov 1969; Orn-
duff 1967-1969; Moore 1970, 1971, 1972, 1974, 1977;
Goldblatt 1981, 1983, 1985, 1988; Goldblatt & Johnson
1990, 1991, 1994). Meiosis was normal in most cells with
occasional chromosome laggards during anaphase I (Fig-
ure 7B & E).
This study confirms a basic chromosome number of
seven for the tribe Poeae. Further studies are, however,
necessary to determine the origin of the other basic chro-
mosome numbers present in the tribe. In this regard Briza
(x- 5 & 7), Colpodium (x = 7 and an aneuploid reduction
series exists, or x = 2), Hainardia (x = 7 or 13), Para-
pliolis (x = 7, 18 or 19) and Sphenopus (x = 6 or 7) should
receive special attention.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The University of the Orange Free State and the Foun-
dation for Research and Development are thanked for fi-
nancial assistance during this study. The National
Botanical Institute is thanked for providing some of the
meiotic material used during this study.
REFERENCES
CLAYTON, W.D. & RENVOIZE, S.A. 1986. Genera graminum—
grasses of the world. Kew Bulletin Additioml Series 13: 1-389.
DE WET, J.M.J. 1958. Additional chromosome numbers in Transvaal
grasses. Cytologia 23: 113-118.
DE WET, J.M.J. & ANDERSON, L.J. 1956. Chromosome numbers in
Transvaal grasses. Cytologia 21: 1-10.
EDWARDS, D. & LEISTNER, O. A. 1 97 1 . A degree reference system for
citing biological records in southern Africa. Mitteilungen der
Botanischen Staatssammlung, MUnchen 10: 501-509.
FEDOROV, A. A. 1969. Chromosome numbers of flowering plants. Acad-
emy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R., Leningrad.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., WATSON, M., KOEKEMOER, M., SMOOK,
L., BARKER, N.P., ANDERSON, H.M. & DALLWITZ, M.J,
1990. Grasses of southern Africa. Memoirs of the Botanical Sur-
vey of South Africa No. 58.
GOLDBLATT, P 1981 . Index to plant chromosome numbers 1975-1978.
Monographs in Systematic Botany 5.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1983. Index to plant chromosome numbers 1979-1981.
Monographs in Systematic Botany 8.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1985. Index to plant chromosome numbers 1982-1983.
Monographs in Systematic Botany 13.
GOLDBLATT, P 1988. Index to plant chromosome numbers 1984—1985.
Monographs in Systematic Botany 23.
GOLDBLATT, P, & JOHNSON, D.E. 1990. Index to plant chromosome
numbers 1986-1987. Monographs in Systematic Botany 30.
GOLDBLATT, P. & JOHNSON, D.E. 1991. Index to plant chromosome
numbers 1988-1989. Monographs in Systematic Botany 40.
GOLDBLATT, P. & JOHNSON, D.E. 1994. Index to plant chromosome
numbers 1990-1991. Monographs in Systematic Botany 51.
HEDBERG, 1. & HEDBERG, O. 1977. Chromosome numbers of afro-al-
pine and afromontane angiosperms. Botaniska Notiser 130: 1-24.
HILL, H.D. 1965. Karyology of species of Bromus, Festuca and Ar-
rhenatherum (Gramineae). Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club
92: 192-197.
KIMBER, G. & ALONSO, L.C. 1981. The analysis of meiosis in hybrids.
HI. Tetraploid hybrids. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytol-
ogy 23: 235-254.
MOORE, R.J. 1970. Index to plant chromosome numbers for 1968.
Regnurn Vegetabile 68.
MOORE, R.J. 1971. Index to plant chromosome numbers for 1969.
Regnurn Vegetabile 77.
MOORE, R.J. 1972. Index to plant chromosome numbers for 1970.
Regnurn Vegetabile 84.
MOORE, R.J. 1974. Index to plant chromosome numbers for 1972.
Regnurn Vegetabile 91.
MOORE, R.J. 1977. Index to plant chromosome numbers for 1973/74.
Regnurn Vegetabile 96.
ORNDUFF, R. 1967. Index to plant chromosome numbers for 1965.
Regnurn Vegetabile 50.
ORNDUFF, R. 1968. Index to plant chromosome numbers for 1966.
Regnurn Vegetabile 55.
ORNDUFF, R. 1969. Index to plant chromosome numbers for 1967.
Regnurn Vegetabile 59.
SPIES, J.J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1986a. Chromosome studies on African
plants. 1. Bothalia 16: 87, 88.
SPIES, J.J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1986b. Chromosome studies on African
plants. 2. Bothalia 16: 269, 270.
SPIES, J.J. & VAN WYK, S.M.C. 1995. Cell fusion: a possible mecha-
nism for the origin of polyploidy. South African Journal of Botany
61:60-65.
SPIES, J.J., SPIES, S.K., VAN WYK, S.M.C, MALAN, A.F. & LIE-
BENBERG, E.J.L, 1996a. Cytogenetic studies of the subfamily
Pooideae (Poaceae) in South Africa. 1. The tribe Aveneae, sub-
tribe Aveninae. Botiuilia 26: 53-61 .
SPIES, J.J., SPIES, S.K., VAN WYK, S.M.C, M/U-AN, A.F. & LIE-
BENBERG, E.J.L. 1996b. Cytogenetic studies of the subfamily
Pooideae (Poaceae) in South Africa. 2. The tribe Aveneae, sub-
tribes Phalaridinae and Alopecurinae. Bothalia 26: 63-67.
Bothalia27,l: 83-89 (1997)
Comparative field performance of three different gas exchange systems
G.F. MIDGLEY*, M. VESTE**, DJ. VON WILLERT**, G.W. DAVIS*, M. STEINBERG** and L.W. POWRIE*
Keywords: ecophysiology, gas exchange measurement, photosynthesis, transpiration
ABSTRACT
We compared portable and continuously monitoring gas exchange systems under field conditions, using Protea glabra
Thunb. as a test species. The aim was to determine if the same patterns of gas exchange and ancillary parameters could be
obtained with rather different measurement systems, and whether the same interpretation and conclusions about environmental
control of gas exchange could be drawn. The following systems were compared: 1, a ‘closed’ portable IRGA manufactured by
Ll-Cor (LI-6200); 2, an ‘open’ portable porometer manufactured by Walz; and 3, a continuously monitoring minicuvette system
with temperature control facility, also manufactured by Walz.
All three systems yielded similar diurnal curves for CO2 uptake, although absolute flux values for the minicuvette system
were lower than those obtained for the portable systems. This was likely due to stem respiration and self-shading of leaves on
the shoot enclosed in the minicuvette. Differences in sampling technique between the two portable systems, primarily with
regard to changes in leaf orientation, resulted in some differences in absolute values of gas fluxes and ancillary parameters such
as leaf temperature and leaf to air vapour pressure difference. However, data from all three systems allowed similar interpreta-
tions to be made about the environmental dependencies of gas exchange patterns. It appears that each system has certain
drawbacks associated with widely varying field conditions. A combination of portable and continuous monitoring techniques
would seem to be the most powerful approach to investigating the gas exchange patterns of terrestrial plants in their natural
environment.
INTRODUCTION
In the last decade, a number of advances in the simul-
taneous measurement of water vapour and CO2 exchange
by plant organs have been made. The present availability
of several commercially produced systems provides a
healthy competitive environment which is to the benefit
of researchers and the quality of their science. However,
the different approaches to gas exchange measurement
used by gas exchange systems make them suitable for
different purposes, and may also have important implica-
tions for the interpretation of results obtained when using
them. In essence, no perfect all-purpose gas exchange sys-
tem exists (Field et al. 1989). The choice of instrument
for any particular task involves two fundamental trade-
offs— between portability and the facility for environ-
mental control, and between replication and resolution.
Field et al. (1989) suggest that a combination of instru-
ments with complementary strengths is a good solution
to this dilemma. This view assumes that different gas ex-
change systems yield similar results, but this assumption
should be tested (Reich et al. 1988). Apart from inade-
quate calibration protocol (Reich & Middendorf 1990),
concern has been expressed about the accuracy of gas flux
and leaf temperature data obtained with leaf cuvettes, and
the need for correction procedures (Rochette et al. 1990;
Idso 1992). On the other hand, Monteith (1990) suggests
that correction of these data is not necessary, as long as
correct sampling procedures are followed.
Considering that sampling approach and technique may
differ a great deal between gas exchange systems, can one
* Stress Ecology Research Programme, National Botanical Institute,
Private Bag X7, Claremont, 7735 Cape Town.
** Department of Applied Botany, University of Munster, D-4400 Munster,
Federal Republic of Germany.
MS. received: 1996-10-18.
expect results yielded by them to be directly comparable?
Only one published study (Winner et al. 1989) that we
know of has addressed this important question, by com-
paring a closed portable photosynthesis system (LI-6200,
LICOR, Lincoln, Nebraska) with an open system (ADC
LCA-2, Analytical Development Corporation, Hoddesdon,
England). Although the results of this study suggested that
the systems gave comparable gas flux values, problems
with experimental protocol prevented a conclusive result.
In this paper, we provide a direct comparison of gas
exchange data obtained by three different gas exchange
systems in a highly variable field environment. This is an
important form of data control in a field where different
research groups become more or less committed to one
make or type of instrument. Our comparison is prelimi-
nary in that we do not address subtle and complex ques-
tions of cuvette design differences between instruments.
We also attempt to draw attention to the advantages of
combining the use of different approaches to gas exchange
measurement in an ecophysiological study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study site and measurement protocol
The study was carried out on the Farm Papkuilsfontein,
near Niewoudtville, Cape Province, South Africa, in an
area of natural vegetation comprising arid Fynbos and
some Karoo elements. The study site was situated near
the edge of an escarpment of the Bokkeveld Mountains
(altitude 800 m, 33°30'S 19°05'E).
For our primary comparison, we present the results of
gas exchange measurements on Protea glabra Thunb., an
evergreen, broad-leaved, sclerophyllous shrub, made on
84
Bothalia27,l (1997)
31 January 1991 (i.e. midsummer). Measurements were
made with a LICOR LI-6200 portable IRGA (LICOR,
Lincoln, Nebraska, USA), a Walz CO2/H2O portable
porometer (Walz, Effeltrich, Germany), and a continuous-
monitoring minicuvette system with temperature control
facility (Walz, Effeltrich, Germany). We also provide the
results of a comparison between only the minicuvette sys-
tem and the Walz porometer, using data collected on 29
September 1990 (spring).
In January, measurements were carried out on adult
individuals which were approximately 1.5 to 2 m tall. To
minimize disturbance to the individual being continuously
monitored by the Walz minicuvette system for other pur-
poses, we used the portable gas exchange systems to sam-
ple an individual of matching size and water status less
than 150 m away (water potentials were measured before
dawn and through the day using a pressure chamber). All
gas exchange instruments were unmodified, and were
used according to their instruction manuals. We attempted
to synchronize sampling with the portable systems as far
as possible. One leaf (that most recently fully expanded
on the shoot) on each of five shoots was measured with
each portable instrument at each sampling time. We re-
turned to measure the same leaves throughout the day,
except that a small number of leaves measured with the
Walz porometer became detached from the plant stem;
these were replaced by leaves of a comparable age and
position on an adjacent stem. Towards the end of the day
(after 16h00), permanently marked leaves sampled by the
LI-6200 became shaded; after this occurred, well-irradi-
ated leaves of a similar age and stem position were sam-
pled and removed at each sampling event. Sampling of
leaves with the LI-6200 was carried out with as little dis-
turbance to the natural leaf angle as possible, although
some disturbance was usually unavoidable. With the Walz
porometer, the upper leaf surface was turned to face the
sun after being enclosed in the cuvette, this being neces-
sary to prevent shading of the leaf by the cuvette lid.
In September 1990, the Walz porometer was compared
only with the minicuvette system. An identical procedure
was followed, except that three leaves were sampled per
sampling period with the Walz porometer, from a smaller
shrub situated not more than 50 m from the continuously
sampled individual.
Leaf areas were measured with a LI-3000 belt system,
or a digitized CAD system (Summa Sketch II, programme
from the Department of Plant Physiology, University of
Wien, Austria).
Instrumentation
Ll-Cor 6200 (Ll-Cor Inc., Lincoln, Nebraska, USA)
We used this battery-powered instrument in its normal
configuration, i.e. a closed system (Welles 1986). After
the leaf is placed in the cuvette, air circulates between the
cuvette and the gas analyser, and the CO2 exchange rate
is computed from the rate of change of CO2 concentration
due to net CO2 uptake or loss by the leaf. Air vapour
pressure can be held constant by manually adjusting a
valve which allows a portion of the circulating air to pass
through a magnesium perchlorate dessicant column — in
this way the effect of leaf transpiration on the vapour pres-
sure of the enclosed air volume can be countered. Leaf
temperature is measured by a chromel-constantan thermo-
couple which makes contact with the underside of the leaf
when the hinged lid of the cuvette is closed. Air tempera-
ture in the cuvette is measured by a shielded thermistor.
Relative humidity is measured by a capacitance sensor
(Vaisala Humicap), which is situated beneath the radiation
shield in the cuvette. The gas analyser (LI-6250) is a non-
dispersive, infrared type which is tuned to the 4.26 mi-
crometer band, providing rejection of IR absorption by
gases other than CO2. The analyser uses as a reference
gas, a closed loop of air that is continuously scrubbed of
C02- Any drift in this zero reference was checked roughly
every two hours during the field work, by switching the
measurement air loop through a soda lime scrubber, with-
out a leaf in the sample cuvette. We used a standard 0.251
chamber (LI-6000- 13), which is constructed of polycar-
bonate, and has a teflon-coated inner surface to minimize
adsorption and desorption effects. The cuvette contains a
small fan which minimizes boundary layer resistance. In-
cident photosynthetic photon flux density is measured by
a LI-190S-1 quantum sensor, which is mounted parallel
with the sampled leaf surface.
Walz CO2/H2O porometer (Walz, Effeltrich, Germany)
This instrument is best operated with the aid of gen-
erator-supplied power. A 12V motor car battery may be
used under field conditions, but this results in a poor IRGA
temperature stabilization, and subsequent drifts in the CO2
zero point. The instrument is normally configured as an
open system (Schulze et al. 1982). Gas exchange rate is
calculated from the difference in concentration between a
reference gas line which samples ambient air, and a sam-
ple gas line which is passed through a cuvette containing
the sampled leaf. Water vapour and CO2 concentrations
are measured by a BINOS I differential infrared gas an-
alyser (Leybold Heraeus, Hanau, Germany). The zero
point of the H2O and CO2 of the BINOS is recorded after
every five measurements for later calculation correction.
This is carried out by making a measurement in the normal
way, but without a leaf in the cuvette. The flowrate in the
measurement line is controlled by a flowmeter (Tylan,
Carson, California, USA).
The sample cuvette is cylindrical (inner diameter 42
mm, height 130 mm) and has a nickel-plated inner surface.
A hinged lid covered by polyethylene foil is used to seal
the sampled leaf at the top of the cuvette. The cuvette has
a circular radiation shield, and a fan ventilates the space
between this and the cuvette to maximize heat transfer.
Leaf temperature is measured by a chromel-alumel ther-
mocouple which presses on the underside of the leaf when
it is enclosed in the cuvette. Cuvette air temperature is
measured by a thermistor. Cuvette humidity is measured
by a capacitance sensor (Vaisala Humicap). The cuvette
contains a small fan which minimizes boundary layer re-
sistance. Incident photosynthetic photon flux density is
measured by a LI- 1 90S quantum sensor, which is mounted
parallel with the sampled leaf surface.
Bothalia 27,1 (1997)
85
Walz minicuvette system (Walz, Effeltrich, Germany)
This system can be operated in the field only with the
aid of power supplied by at least a 0.6 kW generator. The
instrument is configured as an open system, but with a
continuous zero reference, obviating the requirement for
removing the leaf from the sample cuvette to check the
IRGA zero. The humidity of air in the sample and refer-
ence paths may be manipulated by a dewpoint controller.
Differences in H2O and CO2 concentrations between
measurement and reference paths are measured by a dif-
ferential infrared gas analyser (BINOS I, Leybold
Heraeus, Hanau, Germany). Two dewpoint mirrors (MTS
MKl, Walz, Effeltrich, Germany) are mounted in the
flowpath of the measurement gas, one measuring the dew-
point of air entering the cuvette, and the other the exiting
air. This allows calculation of air vapour pressure and tran-
spiration rate which is independent of the reading pro-
vided by the BINOS. This is especially important when
high daytime transpiration rates exceed the range of the
BINOS water vapour channel.
The minicuvette (GK 022) consists of two parts: an
environmental control system of mainly nickel construc-
tion mounted inside a polyethylene shield, and a plexiglass
leaf chamber. Chamber air temperature is controlled by
Peltier elements which are thermally connected to a heat
sink ventilated by a small fan. Cuvette air temperature
can be set to track that of ambient air (measured by a
ventilated PTIOO resistance temperature sensor), or can
be set to maintain a user-defined constant temperature.
Under field conditions the former option is most com-
monly used. Chamber vapour pressure deficit can also be
controlled, or set to track that of the ambient air. The
instrument setup can utilize more than one sample cuvette.
The cuvette design allows a whole shoot of the target
plant to be sampled in its natural position (different cham-
ber types can be constructed which provide great flexibil-
ity in sampling). Leaf temperature is measured by a
nickel-chromel thermocouple which is pressed to the un-
derside of a representative leaf. Chamber air temperature
is measured by a radiation-shielded thermistor. Photosyn-
thetic photon flux density is measured by a LI- 1 90S quan-
tum sensor. A data logger stores data from relevant
channels, and controls the timing of the IRGA zeroing
sequence. The data can be transferred to a personal com-
puter for further computation. The IRGA, pumps and data
logging facilities are best mounted in a medium-sized ve-
hicle (such as a minibus) for mobility, and to alleviate the
harsh conditions often encountered in the field.
Calculation of gas fluxes and conductances
All gas exchange parameters were calculated after Von
Caemmerer & Farquhar (1981) for all three measurement
systems. All fluxes are expressed on a total leaf area basis
(i.e. the total of the upper plus lower leaf surfaces), as
leaves are amphistomatous in this species.
The LI-6200 and the two Walz systems differ slightly
in their approach to calculating leaf conductance to water
vapour. Tdie LI-6200 software computes stomatal conduc-
tance (gs) from leaf conductance to water vapour (gH2o)
by correcting for leaf boundary layer conductance (gb),
according to the equation
1/gs = l/gH20 - 1/gb
The boundary layer conductance value should be experi-
mentally verified for different leaf shapes and sizes, and
may vary according to leaf position in the cuvette. We
used a nominal figure for g^ of 1.7 mol m-2 s->, which
was obtained by using a wet filter paper replica of a sam-
pled leaf in a standard position in the cuvette. The Walz
systems compute total leaf conductance to water vapour
(gH2o)> and do not derive stomatal conductance.
Converting gs computed by the LI-6200 to gH20
duced the conductance value by roughly 0.6% per 10
mmol m-2 s-* (i.e. a gs of 100 mmol m-2 s-' is equal to
gH20 of 94 mmol m-2 s-2), which, within the conductance
range of the species used in this study, is a trivial correction
in relation to other possible sources of error. Therefore, in
this paper we treat gs derived by the LI-6200 as equivalent
to gH20 from the Walz instmments, as would be the situation
when comparing separately published values.
RESULTS
Carbon dioxide exchange
The diurnal pattern of CO2 exchange (Figure lA)
yielded hy the three instruments was qualitatively similar,
with a clear mid-morning peak, followed by a rapid de-
crease (less rapid for the LI-6200) towards midday, and a
steady but less marked decrease towards the evening. The
daily maximum CO2 uptake rate was recorded during the
same period for all systems; maximum rate yielded by the
minicuvette system (3 pmol m-2 $-*) was lower than the
mean recorded by the LI-6200 (3.8 pmol m-2 s'^) and the
Walz porometer (4.9 pmol m-2 s-^- Data variability for
the portable systems (i.e. the coefficient of variation for
each sample period mean expressed as a percentage), was
considerably greater for the LI-6200 (typically 37%) than
for the Walz (typically 27%) during the light period. Nei-
ther portable system gave a realistic value for respiration
rate at low light levels in the early morning, but the LI-
6200 measured a mean respiration rate comparable to that
given by the minicuvette system at the end of the day.
Integrated CO2 uptake for the light period on the Janu-
ary sampling date for the Walz porometer was 120 mmol
CO2 m-2, double that of the minicuvette system (57 mmol
CO2 m-2), with the value for the LI-6200 between these
(99 mmol CO2 m-2).
Water vapour exchange and stomatal conductance
All three systems gave qualitatively matching patterns
for transpiration, and comparable maximum values (Fig-
ure IB). However, peak transpiration was measured ear-
liest by the Walz porometer (around lOhOO) later by the
minicuvette system (12h00), and latest in the day by the
LI-6200 (I3h00). Data variability for the two portable sys-
tems was similar (coefficient of variation around 30% of the
mean for each sample time during the light period). It is
likely that large transpirational water loss rates by leaves in
the minicuvette system resulted in condensation in the meas-
86
Bothalia 27,1 (1997)
FIGURE 1. — Diurnal trends, using Protea glabra as test species, of
parameters measured by three different gas exchange systems on
31 January 1991. A, COj flux; B, transpiration rate; C, cuvette
temperature and dewpoint temperatures of air entering and exiting
sample cuvette on Walz minicuvette system; D, stomatal conduc-
tance for Walz and LICOR portable systems. A, B, D: Walz
porometer, •; L1-62CX), ■; C, Walz minicuvette system, — ; dew-
point out, ; dewpoint in — — - . Vertical bars represent standard
deviations.
uring gas flowpath in the region of the cuvette. This is
reflected in the parallel changes in ambient cuvette tem-
perature and the dewpoint temperature of exiting air be-
fore 12h00 in the minicuvette system (Figure 1C), and it
is unlikely that the transpiration values as measured by
this instrument under these conditions are biologically
meaningful.
The pattern of stomatal conductance as measured by
the two portable systems, as well as the absolute values
and data variability, agree well for most of the day, except
for a marked divergence between the two systems before
09h00 (Figure ID). The transpiration rates measured and
conductances calculated by the LI-6200 for the last sam-
pling period were highly variable, and sometimes nega-
tive, and are not given.
Physical parameters
Each measurement system was applied in a slightly
different way in the field, and this led to some differences
in measured physical parameters such as PPFD (Figure
2A). The Walz porometer measured higher values from
earlier in the day than the LI-6200, due to the need to
orientate the enclosed leaf towards the sun (unfortunately
the Walz porometer used by us did not have the facility
to provide readings greater than 2000 |imol m-2 s’l). Meas-
ured leaf temperature in the Walz minicuvette system was
much lower through the day than that measured by either
portable system, and the Walz porometer yielded higher
leaf temperatures than the LI-6200 (Figure 2B). These tem-
perature differences led also to different leaf to air vapour
pressure differences (AW) in each system (Figure 2C).
Secondary comparison
The comparison of transpiration rate measured by the
Walz porometer and minicuvette system in September
1990 (Figure 3 A) show better agreement in qualitative pat-
tern, and give the expected lower maximum (due to lower
AW) measured by the minicuvette system. Also, conductance
patterns for these two systems were quantitatively and
qualitatively comparable on that day (Figure 3B).
Summary relationships
Linear regressions fitted to plots of CO2 exchange rate
against stomatal conductance (Figure 4A, B) were signifi-
cantly positive. The slopes of this relationship compared
well with the Walz systems in September 1990, but the
LI-6200 gave a somewhat reduced slope value than the
Walz porometer in January 1991, and the lowest correla-
tion coefficient for the regression.
Linear regressions fitted to plots of stomatal conduc-
tance against leaf to air vapour pressure difference were
significantly negative (Figure 5A, B), and the slope of this
relationship given by the portable instruments was com-
parable on both dates. The Walz minicuvette system gave
by far the highest correlation coefficient for this regres-
sion, and the slope of the relationship was slightly steeper
than for the portable machines.
Bothalia27,l (1997)
87
FIGURE 2. — Diurnal trends, using Protea glabra as test species, of
physical parameters measured by three different gas exchange
systems on 31 January 1991. A, photosynthetic photon flux den-
sity; B, leaf temperature; C, leaf to air vapour pressure difference.
Walz porometer, •; LI-6200, ■; Walz minicuvette system, — .
Vertical bars represent standard deviations.
DISCUSSION
Our simultaneous use of three different gas exchange
systems highlighted some heartening similarities in their
data outputs. In contrast to the study of Winner et al.
(1989), the test species used in this study had a clear di-
urnal pattern of water vapour and CO2 exchange which
was revealed by all three systems. However, the data also
suggest some important differences between systems
which may to a large extent be minimized by improve-
ment in system design or standardization of sampling
technique. The biggest difference was found between the
portable machines and the Walz minicuvette system, in
terms of absolute values of CO2 and water vapour flux,
and subsequently calculated conductances. This may be
explained by the inclusion of a whole shoot in the mini-
cuvette system, an approach which had three obvious im-
plications: 1, the gas exchange of leaves with a range of
ages was sampled. It has been established that young
leaves of Protea species tend to have lower photosynthetic
rates than developing and mature leaves (Von Willert et
al. 1989; Van der Heyden & Lewis 1990). The contribu-
tion of all leaves in the cuvette to net CO2 and water
vapour exchange is equally weighted as these fluxes are
calculated on a leaf area basis. This would lead to an
underestimation of these fluxes relative to those measured
by the portable systems, which were used to sample only
mature leaves; 2, leaves on the shoot were self-shaded to
a greater or lesser extent or obliquely positioned relative
to the sun’s rays depending on the position of the sun (and
more closely representing the real situation in the field);
3, stem material enclosed in the Walz minicuvette sample
chamber would have contributed respired CO2.
Because sampling with the LI-6200 system involved
minimum disturbance to leaf orientation, while the Walz
cuvette was aimed directly at the sun for some time before
taking the measurement, the expectation was that Walz
values of CO2 flux during the light period would be
greater than LI-6200 values. This proved to be the case,
especially at midday, when leaf orientation led to the
greatest difference in sampled leaf orientation between the
two portable systems. Which is the correct way to sample,
or indeed, is there a correct way? It can be argued that
enclosing a leaf in any sampling chamber constitutes a
disturbance to the leaf environment. This is especially true
of gas exchange cuvettes, which use turbulent airflow gen-
erated by an internal fan to reduce the leaf boundary layer
resistance. If sampling occurs rapidly enough, it is as-
sumed that stomata do not have time to respond to this
disruption, but it is likely that this assumption is violated
FIGURE 3. — Diurnal trends, using Protea glabra as test species, of
parameters measured by two different gas exchange systems on
29 September 1990. A, transpiration rate; B, stomatal conduc-
tance. Walz porometer, O ; Walz minicuvette system, — . Vertical
bars represent standard deviations.
Bothalia27,l (1997)
FIGURE 4. — The relationship for Protea glabra between stomatal con-
ductance and CO2 flux as measured by three different gas ex-
change systems. A, 31 January 1991;B,29 September 1990. Walz
porometer, O; LI-6200, ■; Walz minicuvette system, •. Statistics
are as follows: A, Ll-6200, ^ 0.65, df = 5 1 , Y = 0.05X -1- 0.44.
Walz porometer, r^ = 0.80, df = 46, Y = 0.08X -t 0.15. B, Walz
porometer, r^ = 0.88, df = 45, Y = 0.08X - 0.22. Walz minicuvette
system, = 0.82, df = 90, Y = 0.08X 0.24.
under certain circumstances, and is species-specific. The
energy balance of a leaf is also altered after being enclosed
in a cuvette, but this is also assumed to have limited im-
mediate effect on leaf function during sampling. McDer-
mitt (1990) provides a brief summary of important
considerations in this regard. Changes in leaf orientation
during sampling constitute a disruption to the function of
the leaf which may have immediate or delayed impacts
on leaf energy balance, stomatal movements and the ve-
locity of leaf photo- and biochemical reactions. Leaf pho-
tochemical reactions may be rapid in response to changes
in light energy, but stomatal responses tend to be rather
slower (Gross & Chabot 1979). If leaf orientation is to be
altered for a sample, it seems prudent to establish first the
rapidity of stomatal and biochemical changes in the spe-
cies under study.
By changing sampled leaf orientation it is possible to
control, to some extent, the PPFD incident on a sampled
leaf surface using a portable system. This can be a useful
technique, for example, for standardizing light conditions
for different samples. In this study, the effect of stand-
ardizing light conditions (i.e. by aiming the leaf directly
at the sun), using the Walz porometer, appeared to result
in less noisy data, as can be seen in the correlation coef-
ficients for the relationship between gH20 ^^d A for the
portable instruments. This method could shortcut more
comprehensive but time-consuming sampling strategies
for portable systems such as stratifying sampling accord-
ing to leaf orientation or angle classes, but depends on
knowledge of the rapidity of the physiological response.
Gas flux values obtained with a continuous monitoring
system, such as the minicuvette system, may be the most
accurate means of estimating diurnal carbon and water
budgets, but the technique is limited by low potential for
replication. Certainly, this type of system offers a level of
data resolution which may improve interpretation of the
effects of changing environmental conditions on gas ex-
change processes. This can be seen clearly in the relation-
ship between AW and gH20> which reveals a remarkably
close relationship between these parameters that is masked
by considerable variability in the data from the portable
systems.
Technical limitations
Each system we used revealed shortcomings in the
widely varying field environment. For the minicuvette
system, the main problem seemed to be adsorption and
desorption processes, especially under conditions of high
air dew point temperature (i.e. in the morning on the Janu-
ary sampling date). The problem was not apparent on the
September sampling date, when relative humidity was
relatively low during the morning.
FIGURE 5. — The relationship for Protea glabra between leaf to air
vapour pressure difference and stomatal conductance as meas-
ured by three different gas exchange systems. A, 31 January 1991;
B, 29 September 1990. Walz porometer, o; LI-6200, ■; Walz
minicuvette system, •. Statistics are as follows: A, LI-6200, r^ =
0.47, df = 53, Y = -0.88X -1- 62.43. Walz porometer, r^ = 0.32, df
= 32, Y = - 0.83X -I- 68.48. B, Walz porometer, r^ = 0.33, df =
36, Y = - 0.79X -I- 52.32. Walz minicuvette system, r^ = 0.93, df
= 68, Y = -1.12X-h 39.38.
Bothalia27,l (1997)
89
Accurate measurement of water vapour concentration
in the sample cuvette appeared to be a major problem for
the LI-6200 early and late in the day, when humidity was
high. The LI-6200 relies on an accurate measurement of
this parameter for calculating transpiration rate and hence
stomatal conduetance. It is well documented that the ac-
curacy of the Vaisala Humicap sensor is strongly affected
above about 80% relative humidity (McDermitt 1990),
and that fairly small errors in humidity measurement can
lead to large errors in conductance when ambient humidity
is either very low or very high (Welles 1986; McDermitt
1990) ; this may explain the deviation of conductance val-
ues between the portable systems early in the morning
and at the end of the light period. However, the Vaisala
Humicap is relatively robust within the effective range
(10%-80%, McDermitt 1990), as is clear from the simi-
larity between measurements of water vapour flux be-
tween this system and the Walz porometer through the
day. The combination CO2/H2O IRGA used by the Walz
porometer appeared to be a superior system under high
humidity conditions.
Sampling with the portable systems was plagued pri-
marily by cuvette heating problems, which were of two
types: firstly, enclosed leaves heated up rapidly during
measurement, and secondly, the euvettes themselves
heated up during a sampling run. Apart from direct effects
on leaf function, this affects compound parameters such
as leaf to air vapour pressure difference, a parameter
which is thought to be of considerable importance in sto-
matal movements (Aphalo & Jarvis 1991), possibly
through its effect on transpiration rate (Mott & Parkhurst
1991) . Schulze et al. (1982) suggested shading the head
of portable porometers between measurements to avoid
heating, yet Tyree & Wilmot ( 1 990) showed how a shaded
LICOR Li- 1600 porometer cuvette rapidly reduced the
temperature of irradiated sugar maple leaves, leading to
considerable modification of water vapour flux and cal-
culated conductance. Recently developed portable systems
which use Peltier cooling systems to allow chamber tem-
perature to track ambient temperature may remove this
limitation. This is a positive step in reducing the intru-
siveness of sampling with a portable system.
CONCLUSIONS
All sampling techniques used by us yielded equivalent
results, and therefore appear to be directly comparable.
However, we urge users of portable systems to describe
the procedure followed when clamping cuvettes onto
leaves; this will contribute to more effective assessment
and cross-comparison of data.
In general, matching interpretations about complex en-
vironmental and stomatal determinants of gas exchange
patterns could be made using the data obtained from all
three systems, which can be seen clearly in the relation-
ships obtained between stomatal conductance and daytime
CO2 fluxes, and between AW and stomatal conductanee.
Therefore, we eoncur with the suggestion of Field et al.
(1989: 239) that the combination of a continuous moni-
toring technique with a well designed stratified sampling
strategy using a portable system, may be the most pow-
erful way to investigate gas exchange patterns in the field.
It remains to be seen whether more recently developed
portable systems with peltier-eooled cuvettes will increase
the effectiveness of clamp-on gas exchange systems.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The support of the Deutscher Akademischer Austausch-
dienst and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft is ac-
knowledged (MV, DJvW, MS). Volkswagen of SA Ltd
(Uitenhage, South Africa) supplied two vehicles. We thank
Willem van Wyk, owner of Papkuilsfontein at Nie-
woudtville, for permission to work on his property, and
for his helpfulness and hospitality during our stay.
REFERENCES
APHALO, P.J. & JARVIS, P.G. 1991. Do stomata respond to relative
humidity? P/ant, Cell and Environment 14: 127-132.
FELD, C.B., BALL, J.T. & BERRY, J.A. 1989. Photosynthesis: princi-
ples and field techniques. In R.W. Pearcy, J.R. Ehleringer, H.A.
Mooney & P.W. Rundel, Plant physiological ecology, field meth-
ods and instrumentation: 209-253. Chapman & Hall, London.
GROSS, L.J. & CHABOT, B E. 1979. Time course of photosynthetic
responses to changes in incident light energy. Plant Physiology
63: 1033-1038.
IDSO, S.B. 1992. Net photosynthesis: corrections required of leaf chamber
measurements. Agriculniral and Forest Meteorology 58: 35-42.
MCDERMITT, D.K. 1990. Sources of error in the estimation of stomatal
conductance and transpiration from porometer data. Hortscience
25: 1538-1548.
MONTEITH, J.L. 1990. Porometry and baseline analysis: the case for
compatability. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 49: 1 55-167.
MOTT, K.A. & PARKHURST, D.F. 1991. Stomatal responses to humid-
ity in air and helox. Plant, Cell and Environment 14: 509-515.
REICH, P.B. & MIDDENDORF, L. 1990. Sources of variation in
porometry data. Plant, Cell and Environment 13: 879.
REICH, P.B., WALTERS, M B. & TABONE, T.J. 1988. Variation in
response of five identical steady-state porometers. Plant, Cell and
Environment 1 1 : 785, 786.
ROCHETTE. P, PATTEY, E., DESJARDINS. R.L. & DWYER, L.M.
1990. Adjustment of leaf temperature measurements in LI-COR
6200 assimilation chamber using energy balance calculations.
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 53: 149-156.
SCHULZE, E.-D., HALL, A.E., LANGE, O.L. & WALZ. H. 1982. A
portable steady-state porometer for measuring the carbon dioxide
and water vapour exchange of leaves under natural conditions.
Oecologia 53: 141-145.
TYREE, M.T. & WILMOT, TR. 1990. Errors in the calculation of evapo-
ration and leaf conductance in steady-state porometry: the impor-
tance of accurate measurement of leaf temperature. Canadian
Journal of Forest Research 20: 103 1-1035.
VAN DER HEYDEN, F. & LEWIS. O.A.M. 1990. Environmental control
of photosynthetic gas exchange characteristics of lynbos species
representing three growth forms. South African Journal of Botany
56; 654-658.
VON CAEMMERER, S. & FARQUHAR, G.D. 1981. Some relation-
ships between the biochemistiy of photosynthesis and the gas
exchange of leaves under natural conditions. Planta 153:
376-387.
VON WILLERT, D.J., HERPPICH, M. & MILLER, J.M. 1989. Photo-
synthetic characteristics and leaf water relations of mountain fyn-
bos vegetation in the Cedarberg area (South Africa). South African
Journal of Botany 55; 288-298.
WELLES, J. 1986. A portable photosynthesis system. In W.G. Gensler,
Advanced agricultural instrumentation, design and use: 21-38.
Nijhoff, Dordrecht.
WINNER, W.E., PARKINSON, K.J., MCDERMITT, D.K., ROEMER,
S.C, & CLINE, S.P. 1989. Measurement and comparison of gas
exchange of Pinus halepensis and Flaveria brownii using com-
mercial photosynthesis systems. Photosynthetica 23: 585-602.
Bothalia 27,1: 91-96(1997)
OBITUARY
LESLIE CHARLES LEACH (1909-1996)
Leslie Charles Leach (Figure 1), known to friends as
Larry, was bom at Southend-on-Sea in Essex, England on
18 November 1909. After leaving school he passed the
entrance examination of the British Army Technical
School where he completed a course in electrical technol-
ogy. Serving as an Army technician, he gained wide ex-
perience in electrical engineering. He applied successfully
for a post in Southern Rhodesia [now Zimbabwe] and
arrived in Salisbury [now Harare] in January 1938. Here
he met and married Ann (often called Nan) in 1939. In
1944 he established his own business, following the ac-
quisition of premises on Sinoia Street in Harare. Concern-
ing himself mainly with the supply of electrical equipment
for vehicles and aircraft, he traded productively under the
name of L.C. Leach.
Larry’s interest in succulents started in 1950 after he
had purchased a 10 acre plot near Harare, which he named
‘Farview’. Initially he cultivated a variety of plants, but
gradually his attention centred on succulents. Larry en-
deavoured to learn more about succulents than could be
gleaned from available literature or expertise. Soon he be-
gan to concentrate on the systematic collection of Stape-
lieae, Euphorbieae and species of Aloe.
In 1956, after selling his business, he visited the eastern
Transvaal [now Mpumalanga] and southern Mozambique
to compare Euphorbia confinalis R.A.Dyer with closely
related plants that he had studied in Zimbabwe. At that
time he purchased a 25 morgen plot south of Nelspmit.
Satisfied that the Zimbabwean plants were distinct from
E. confinalis, he soon embarked on several, mainly self-
financed expeditions to investigate and collect the species
of the Flora zambesiaca area, and to see as many succu-
lent euphorbias as possible at their type localities. After
the death of his wife in 1958, following a long illness, he
intensified his research efforts. The journeys encompassed
most of southern Africa, including Zambia, Angola,
Mozambique, South Africa and Namibia, as well as Tan-
zania and Kenya. He was at times accompanied by R.D.A.
Bayliss, I.C. Cannell, H. Hall, A.R.A. Noel, A. Percy-
Lancaster, R.O.B. Rutherford-Smith, E.A.C.L.E. Schelpe,
J.A. Whellan, G. Williamson, and H. Wild. His extensive
expeditions are summarized in Codd (1966), Schelpe
(1969) and Gomes e Sousa (1971).
The Angola trip in 1967 was partly financed by grants
from the CSIR. On this occasion he collected several new
records of ferns, written up by Schelpe (1968). These col-
lecting trips were often fraught with difficulties and dan-
gers. Two attempts to reach Goa Island, northern
Mozambique, to see E. angularis, failed because of an
allergy to mosquito bites, which he had developed on a
previous excursion. However, at the third attempt, with
the assistance of the Portuguese Naval Authorities, he
landed on Goa Island only to find that E. angularis was
neither flowering nor fruiting. Three years later, he was
back on Goa Island, collecting flowers and fruits. In 1962
Larry was accompanied by Schelpe to collect ferns and
Euphorbia spp. in northern Mozambique. However, a
near-fatal viral dysentery grounded the expedition for a
week in Blantyre.
From 1972 to 1981, Larry worked as Honorary Bota-
nist on the staff of Zimbabwe’s National Herbarium. Here
he described himself as ‘probably Rhodesia’s only unpaid
civil servant’. Larry persuaded the Aloe, Cactus and Suc-
culent Society of Zimbabwe to publish a taxonomic series
supplementary to Excelsa. Four volumes, containing,
among others, monographs of the Stapelieae taxa Orbea,
Stapelia, Huemia and Tridentea, appeared between 1978
and 1988 with Larry as the sole author. In December 1981
he emigrated to South Africa and settled first at the Bo-
tanical Research Institute in Pretoria (Figure 2) and was
then employed at the National Botanic Garden at Worces-
ter from 1982 to 1989. Until the time of his death he was
employed as Honorary Research Fellow in the Depart-
ment of Botany of the University of the North. Larry
passed away on 18 July 1996 at the age of 86. Sadly he
could not complete the treatment of the succulent Euphor-
biaceae for Flora zambesiaca which would have culmi-
FIGURE 1.— Leslie (Larry) Charles Leach (1909-1996).
92
Bothalia 27,1 (1997)
FIGURE 2. — Larry Leach at his desk at the Botanical Research Institute,
Pretoria, December 1981 . Photo.: courtesy of The Pretoria News.
nated forty years of immensely dedicated research on
Euphorbieae and Stapelieae.
In later years Larry spent ‘far too much’ time on no-
menclatural disputes. The identity of the controversial
name, Euphorbia candelabrum is such an example (Carter
1982, 1985, 1988; editor’s notes in The Euphorbia Journal
4: 4 (1987); Leach 1974c, 1981a, 1985b, 1986f, 1992a).
Lairy presented convincing arguments that E. candela-
brum is the correct name for an arborescent species in
Angola (letters to the editor of The Euphorbia Journal
1987). He also fought against the apparently misapplied
lectotypification of Stapelia variegata (Leach 198 Id).
Convinced that the International Code of Botanical No-
menclature could be improved, a number of proposals for
amendation of parts of the Code were unsuccessfully sub-
mitted.
Larry was a prolific collector, often in inaccessible lo-
calities in the Flora zambesiaca and Flora of southern
Africa regions with ± 10 000 personal accessions being
taken up in various southern African and European her-
baria, although current collecting numbers are in the re-
gion of 18 000 through the inclusion of specimens sent
to him for study.
Larry discovered and described four genera and 150
species and infraspecific taxa in the Euphorbieae, Stape-
lieae and the genus Aloe. Yet his most valuable contri-
FIGURE 3. — Prof. J.N. Eloff presenting the Golden Cactus Award of the International Organization for Succulent Plant Study to Larry Leach in
1990. Photo.; courtesy of The Pretoria News.
Bothalia27,; '997)
93
bution probably was the tracking down of imperfectly
known species to their type localities and establishing
their correct identity. His wide interest in plants resulted
in his being commemorated in the following taxa: Aloe
leachii Reynolds, Cheilanthes leachii (Schelpe) Schelpe,
Crassula leachii R.Fern., Dombeya leachii Wild, Echid-
nopsis leachii Lavranos, Eulophia leachii Greatrex ex
A.V.Hall, Huernia leachii Lavranos, x Orbeostemon
leachii RV.Heath, Leachia Plowes, Leachiella Plowes
and Larryleachea Plowes.
In 1990 Leach was the first recipient in Africa of the
Golden Cactus Award of the International Organization
for Succulent Plant Study based in Zurich (Figure 3). He
was also honoured with the Harry Bolus Medal by the
Botanical Society of South Africa in 1968 (Schelpe 1969),
the Gold Medal of the Rhodesian Scientific Association
in 1977 (Kimberley 1977), the Certificate of Merit of the
South African Association of Botanists in 1981 and the
Allen Dyer medal of the Succulent Society of Southern
Africa (Anon. 1994).
Larry was elected a Fellow of the Aloe and Succulent
Society of Zimbabwe in 1975 and the Cactus and Succu-
lent Society of America in 1983 (Mitich 1983). He was
a vice president of the Rhodesian Aloe & Succulent So-
ciety and the African Succulent Plant Society of England.
Various tributes to Larry Leach appeared in Gomes e
Sousa (1971), Schelpe (1969), Kimberley (1988), Mitich
(1983) and Downs (1996).
South African botany has profited immensely from the
work of highly motivated, well-versed amateurs. Larry
Leach was one of the greatest among them.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am grateful to Dr H.F. Glen (NBI) for providing some
information and pictures.
REFERENCES
ANON. 1994. Allen Dyer Award. Aloe 31 : 79.
CARTER, S. 1982. New succulent spiny euphorbias from East Africa.
Hooker's leones Plmtarum 39, 3: 1-1 17.
CARTER, S. 1985. Euphorbia candelabrum, a question of validity
(Euphorbiaceae). Taxon 34: 699-701.
CARTER, S. 1988. Euphorbia candelabrum: a controversial name. The
Euphorbia Journal 5: 105-107.
CODD, L.E. 1966. Contemporary botanists and botanical collectors. 2.
Leslie Charles Leach. Bothalia 8. Suppl. 1: 61-64.
DOWNS, PE. 1996. Larry Leach 1909-1996. British Cactus and Succu-
lent Journal 14: 146, 147.
GOMES E SOUSA, A. 1971. Exploradores e naturalistas da Flora de
Mogambique. Boletim da Sociedade de Estudos de Mogambique
40: 99-115.
KIMBERLEY, M.J. 1977. Gold Medal Award [Including excerpts of the
Financial Gazette 14-10-1977; Rhodesia Herald 14-10-1977].
Quarterly Newsletter No. 36. of the Aloe, Cactus and Succulent
Society of Rhodesia.
KIMBERLEY, M.J. 1988. Leslie Charles Leach: Euphorbiarum botani-
cus insignis. The Euphorbia Journal 5: 4, 5.
MITICH, L.W. 1983. Leach, Barthlott and Cole are named fellows in
C.S.S.A. Cactus & Succulent Journal (US) 55: 250, 251.
SCHELPE, E.A.C.L.E. 1968. Pteridophyta collected in Angola by Messrs
Leach and Cannell. Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana 42:
249-261.
SCHELPE, E.A.C.L.E. 1969. Mr L.C. Leach— Bolus Medalist, 1968.
Journal of the Botanical Society of South Africa 55: 21-23.
PUBLICATIONS BY L.C. LEACH
BALLY PR O. & LEACH, L.C. 1962. 13. A new Euphorbia from South
central Africa. In PR O. Bally, Miscellaneous notes on the flora of
tropical East Africa including description of new taxa: 8-15.
Caitdollea 18: 347-351.
DE WINTER, B., GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E., KILLICK, D.J.B.,
ROURKE, J.P., OLIVER, E.G.H. & LEACH, L.C. 1992. (93)
Proposal to limit the retro-activity of Article 8.3. Taxon 41: 359.
LEACH, L.C. 1963a. Euphorbia johnsonii, its rediscovery and an ampli-
fied description. Kirkia 3: 34—36.
-1964a. Euphorbia species from the Flora zambesiaca area. Journal of
South African Botany 30: 1-12.
-1964b. Euphorbia species from the Flora zambesiaca area: 2. Kirkia 4:
15-23.
-1964c. Euphorbia species from the Flora zambesiaca area: III. Journal
of South African Botany 30: 209-217.
-1965a. Stapelieae from south tropical Africa, I. Journal of South African
Botany 31: 241-249.
-1965b. Euphorbia species from the Flora zambesiaca area: IV. Journal
of South African Botany 3 1 : 25 1-257.
-1966a. Euphorbia species from the Flora zambesiaca area: V. Journal of
South African Botany 32: 173-182.
-1966b. Euphorbia species from the Flora zambesiaca area: VI. Kirkia 6:
133-147.
-1967. Euphorbia species from the Flora zambesiaca area; VII. Journal
of South African Botany 33: 247-262.
-1968a. Two new stapeliads from Cape Province. Journal of South Afri-
can Botany 34: 135-142.
-1968b. A new Euphorbia from Tanzania. Journal of South African
Botany 34: 289-294.
-1968c. A new Aloe from Rhodesia. Journal of South African Botany 34:
363-370.
-1968d. Euphorbiae succulentae angolenses — I. Boletim da Sociedade
Broteriana 42: 161-179.
-1969a. Euphorbiae succulentae angolenses: II. Boletim da Sociedade
Broteriana 43: 163-182.
-1969b. Euphorbia species from the Flora zambesiaca area: VIII. Jour-
nal of South African Botany 35: 13-23.
-1969c. Stapelieae from south tropical Africa. V. Bothalia 10: 45-54.
-1969d. Huemia urceolata. The Flowering Plants of Africa 39: t. 1550.
-1970a. Euphorbia species from the Flora zambesiaca area: IX. Journal
of South African Botany 36: 13-52.
-1970b. The identity of Aloe vituensis Baker. Journal of South African
Botany 36: 57-62.
-1970c. Stapelieae (Asclepiadaceae) from south tropical Africa: VI. Jour-
nal of South African Botany 36: 157-189.
-1970d. Euphorbiae succulentae angolenses: III. Boletim da Sociedade
Broteriana 44: 185-206.
-1971a. Euphorbia virosa Willd., with a new synonym and two new taxa
from Angola. Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana 45: 349-362.
-1971b. Two new species of Aloe (Liliaceae) from tropical Africa. Jour-
nal of South African Botany 37: 41-52.
94
-1971c. Two new species of Aloe (Liliaceae) from south tropical Africa.
Journal of South African Botany 37: 249-266.
-1972. Two new species of Aloe (Liliaceae) from Zambia. Journal of
South African Botany 38: 185-194.
-1973a. Euphorbia species from the Flora zambesiaca area: 10. Journal
of South African Botany 39: 3-32.
-1973b. Euphorbia tirucalli L.: its typification, synonymy and relation-
ships with notes on ‘Almeidina’ and ‘Cassoneira’ . Kirkia 9:
69-86.
-1973c. New and interesting taxa of the tribe Euphorbieae (Euphor-
biaceae) from Portuguese Africa. Garcia de Orta, ser. Bot. I:
31-42.
-1973d. Stapelieae (Asclepiadaceae) from south tropical Africa: VII.
Bothalia 11: 133-137.
-1974a. Stapelieae (Asclepiadaceae) from south tropical Africa: 8. Jour-
nal of South African Botany 40: 1 5-25.
-1974b. Notes on the aloes of south tropical Africa with four new species
and a new variety. Journal of South African Botany 40: 101-122.
-1974c. Euphorbiae succulentae angolenses: IV. Garcia de Orta, ser. Bot.
2: 31-54.
-1974d. Stapelieae from south tropical Africa: IX. Kirkia 9: 349-358.
-1975a. Euphorbia gummifera, E. gregaria and a new species from
Damaraland. Bothalia 1 1 : 495-503.
-1975b. Notes on Euphorbia mauritanica, E. gossypina and some related
species with an amplified description of E. berotica. Bothalia 11:
505-510.
-1975c. The lectotype species of Stapelia L. and the reinstatement of
Orbea Haw. (Asclepiadaceae). Kirkia 10: 287-291.
-1975d. A new species of Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) from Zambia and a
new name for an Angolan species. Bulletin du Jardin botanique
national de Belgique 45: 205-209.
-1975e. Euphorbiae succulentae angolenses: V. Garcia de Orta, ser. Bot.
2: 111-116.
-1975T Euphorbia species from the Flora zambesiaca area: 1 1 . Kirkia 1 0:
293.
-1976a. Euphorbia (Tetracanthae) in Angola and northern Kaokoveld.
Dinteria 12: 1-35.
-1976b. Distributional and morphological studies of the tribe Euphor-
bieae (Euphorbiaceae) and their relevance to its classification and
possible evolution. Excelsa 6: 3-19.
-1976c. A preliminary review of the prominently papillose Huemia spe-
cies (Asclepiadaceae). Journal of South African Botany 42:
439-487.
-1976d. A review of the Euphorbia brevis-imitata-decidua complex
with descriptions of five new species. Bulletin du Jardin bo-
tanique national de Belgique 46: 241-263.
-1976e. The Huernia kirkii-H. hislopii confusion. Bulletin of the African
Succulent Plant Society 11:1 8-20.
-1977a. Notes on Aloe (Liliaceae) species of the Flora zambesiaca area.
Kirkia 10: 385-389.
-1977b. Euphorbia species from the Flora zambesiaca area: 12. Kirkia
10: 391-400.
-1977c. Euphorbiae succulentae angolenses: VI. Garcia de Orta, ser. Bot.
3: 99-102.
-1978a. A contribution towards a new classification of Stapelieae
(Euphorbiaceae) with a preliminary review of Orbea Haw. and
description of three new genera. Excelsa Taxonomic ser. 1 : 1-75.
-1978b. On the classification of Stapelieae and the re-instatement of
Tridentia Haw. Proceedings and Transactions of the Rhodesia
Scientific Association 59: 1-5.
-1979a. Euphorbia proballyana Leach and Euphorbia waterbergensis
R. A. Dyer. Cactus & Succulent Journal (U.S.) 51: 57-59.
-1979b. The correct spelling of Euphorbia monteiri Hook.f and the
operation of Art. 73.10, ICBN 1978. Timm 28: 602-604.
-1980a. A new species of Euphorbia (Section Tetracanthae) from Trans-
vaal. Journal of South African Botany 46: 207-2 1 1 .
-1980b. Euphorbia quadrangularis Pax and a closely related new species
from Tanzania. Journal of South African Botany 46: 3 1 3-323.
-1980c. A review of Tridentia Haw. Excelsa Taxonomic ser. 2: 1-68.
-1980d. Miscellaneous notes on Stapelia L. Excelsa Taxonomic ser. 2:
69-73.
-1980c. A taxonomic review of Euphorbia gariepina Boiss., its distribu-
tion, variability and synonymy. Excelsa Taxonomic ser. 2: 74— 81 .
-1980f Some comments on intergeneric hybrids. Asclepiadaceae 20: 11, 12.
-1980g. On the classification of Tridentia Haw. Asclepiadaceae 21 : 20, 21.
Bothalia 27,1 (1997)
-1981a. Euphorbia candelabrum Welw. versus Euphorbia candelabrum
Kotschy. Taxon 30: 483-485.
-1981b. A new Euphorbia from the Karoo. Journal of South African
47: 103-107.
-1981c. A new Euphorbia from South West Africa. Journal of South
African Botany 47: 807-8 1 1 .
-198 Id. On the lectotypification of Stapelia L. and a proposal for the
clarification of Article 8 of the ICBN. Taxon 30: 227-229.
-1982a. A new species of Euphorbia from the Namib, South West Africa.
Dinteria 16: 27-31.
-1982b. The re-instatement of Tromotriche Haw. (Stapelieae). Journal of
South African Botany 48: 425, 426.
-1983a. A new Euphorbia from South West Africa. Journal of South
African Botany 49: 189-192.
-1983b. A new species of Synadenium from Mozambique. Garcia de
Orta, ser. Bot. 6: 47-50.
-1983c. Tridentea pachyrrhiza. The Elowering Plants of Africa 47: t.
1871.
-1983d. On the classification of the Stapelieae. Bradleya 1: 79, 80.
-1983e. A discussion of some aspects of Eluernia taxonomy. Bradleya 1:
81-83.
-1984a. A new Euphorbia from South Africa. Jourtuil of South African
Botany 50: 341-345.
-1984b. A revision of Tromotriche Haw. (Asclepiadaceae). Journal of
South African Botany 50: 549-562.
-1984c. A new Euphorbia from the Richtersveld. Journal of South Afri-
can Botany 50: 563-568.
-1984d. New taxa of Stapelia L. (Asclepiadaceae) from the Cape Prov-
ince. South African Journal of Botany 3: 169-178.
-1985a. A new species of Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae). South African
Journal of Botany 51: 281-283.
-1985b. Euphorbia candelabrum Welw. and other tree-like species. The
Euphorbia Journal 3: 91-94.
-1985c. A revision of Stapelia L. (Asclepiadaceae). Excelsa Taxonomic
ser. 3: 1-157.
-1986a. The identity of Huernia concinna N.E. Br. and two new species
from the Somali Republic. Excelsa 12: 93-98.
-1986b. Euphorbia fdiflora. The Elowering Plants of Africa 49: t. 1927.
-1986c. Euphorbia hcdipedicola. The Elowering Plants of Africa 49: t.
1928.
-1986d. A new Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) from the western Cape Prov-
ince. South African Journal of Botany 52: 10-12.
-1986e. Anew Euphorbia from the western Knersvlakte. South African
Journal of Botany 52: 369-371.
-1986L Euphorbia candelabrum Welw. and related matters. Ttmm 35:
711-714.
-1987. To ‘lump’ or not to ‘lump’, are infraspecific concepts always
useful or desirable? Veld cfe Elora 12: 123.
-1988a. A revision of Huernia R.Br. (Asclepiadaceae). Excelsa Taxo-
nomic ser. 4: 1-197.
-1988b. A new species of Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) from the south-
western Cape. South African Journal of Botany 54: 501-503.
-1988c. The Euphorbia juttae-gentilis complex, with a new species and
a new subspecies. South African Journal of Botany 54: 534-538.
-1988d. A new species of Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) from the Mossel
Bay area. South African Journal of Botany 54: 539, 540.
-1989. Validation of the combination Duvalia immaculata (Luckhoff)
Bayer. South African Journal of Botany 55: 268.
-1990. Euphorbia species from the Flora zambesiaca area: Xlll. A new
species from the Chimanimani Mountains. Kirkia 13: 319-322.
- 1 99 1 a. Euphorbia species from the Flora zambesiaca area XIV. New and
imperfectly known species of section Tetracanthae Pax from
Zambia and Malawi with discussion of two ‘key’ species from
Tanzania and a diagnosis of section Tetracanthae. Excelsa 15:
7-22.
-1991b. Euphorbia griseola Pax: its subspecies and relationships. The
Euphorbia Journal 1: 131-137.
-1991c. Comments on a review of the revision of Huernia R.Br. Ask-
lepios 52: 83, 84.
-1992a. Euphorbia candelabrum auctt. Collectanea Botanica2\: 91-95.
-1992b. Euphorbia knuthii Pax: its distribution and other matters. The
Euphorbia Journal 8: 72, 73.
-1993. Tavaresia versus Decabelone (Asclepiadaceae). Ttmm 42:
665-667.
Bothalia27,l (997)
95
-1995. The preparation of good (useful) herbarium specimens of succu-
lent plants especially of the spiny euphorbias and of the stapeliads
and aloes. Asklepios 64: 24—26.
LEACH, L.C. & LAVRANOS, J.J. 1963. A new species of Hiiernia from
Mozambique. Kirkia 3: 38^0.
LEACH, L.C. & PLOWES, D.C.H. 1966a. Stapelieae from south tropical
Africa; 11. Journal of South African Botany 32: 41-60. Reprinted
in Asklepios 28: 68-80 (1983).
-1966b. Stapelieae from south tropical Africa: 111. Journal of South
African Botany 32: 299-303.
-1967. Stapelieae from south tropical Africa; IV. Journal of South African
Botany 33: 99-106.
LEACH, L.C. & WILLIAMSON, G. 1990. The identities of two con-
fused species of Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) with descriptions of
two closely related new species from Namaqualand. South Afri-
can Journal of Botany 56; 71—78.
LIST OF TAXA DESCRIBED BY L.C. LEACH
Sections and subsections of genera not included. Subsequent combinations are not indicated.
EUPHORBIACEAE
Endadenium
Euphorbia
albipollinifera
ainbroseae
ambroseae var. spinosa
atrocarmesina
atrocarmesina subsp. arborea
bayeri
baylissii
bougheyi
bruynsii
cannellii
carunculifera
carunculifera subsp. subfastigiata
congestiflora
contorta
confmalis subsp. rhodesiaca
cooperi N.E.Br. var. calidicola
cuneniana
cuneniana subsp. rhizomatosa
curocana
daniarana
debilispina
decidua Bally & Leach
decliviticola
dedzana
demissa
dispersa
distinctissima
dissitispina
eduardoi
ephedroides E.Mey. ex Boiss.
var. debilis
var. imminuta Leach & Williamson
exilis
fanshawei
faucicola
fortissimo
fragiliramulosa
francescae
gentilis N.E.Br. subsp. tanquana
giessii
glandularis Leach & Williamson
gracilicaulis
grandicomis Goeb. ex N.E.Br. subsp. ejuncta
graniticola
griseola subsp. mashonica
griseola subsp. zambiensis
halipedicola
indurescens
ingenticapsa
inundaticola
jubata
lavrani
linearibracteata
lividiflora
louwii
luapulana
lumbricalis
malevola
malevola subsp. bechuanica
mira
miscella
mlanjeana
monteiri Hook.f. subsp. ramosa
mwinilungensis
namuskluftensis
nubigena
nubigena var. rutilans
oligoclada
otjipernbana
papillosicapsa
parviceps
pedemontana
perplexa
perplexa var. kasamana
persistentifolia
platyrrhiza
proballyana
pteroclada
quadrilatera
radiifera
ramulosa
richardsiae
richardsiae subsp. robusta
rugosiflora
schmitzii
scitula
semperflorens
sereti De Wild, subsp. variantissima
speciosa
subsalsa Hiem subsp. fluvialis
strangulata N.E.Br. subsp. deminuens
teixeirae
tholicola
vaalputsiana
vallaris
viduiflora
virosa Willd. subsp. arenicola
whellanii
wildii
williamsonii
Monadeniurn
cannellii
torrei
Synadenium halipedicola
ALOACEAE
Aloe
andongensis Baker, var. repens
bicomiticum
cannellii
enotata
esculenta
excelsa Berger var. breviflora
inamara
lepida
luapulana
procera
scorpioides
tauri
trigonantha
vallaris
96
Bothalia27,l (1997)
ASCLEPIADACEAE Orbeopsis
Caralluma caudata N.E.Br. subsp. rhodesiaca Orbeanthus
Huemia
archeri
bayeri
brevirostris N.E.Br. subsp. baviaana
erectiloba Leach & Lavranos
formosa
guttata (Masson) Haw. subsp. calitzdorpensis
hislopii Tuirill subsp. robusta Leach & Plowes
hystrix (Hook.f.) N.E.Br. var. parvula
lavrani
longituba N.E.Br. subsp. cashelensis Leach & Plowes
occulta Leach Sc Plowes
pillansii N.E.Br subsp. echidnopsioides
plowesii
quinta (Phillips) White & Sloane var. blyderiverensis
thudichumii
urceolata
verekeri Stent var, angolensis
verekeri Stent var. pauciflora
Orbea
halipedicola
halipedicola subsp. septentrionalis
speciosa
Pachycymbium
Stapelia
baylissii
erectiflora N.E.Br. var. prostratiflora
kougabergensis
montana
montana var. grossa
obducta
praetermissa
praetermissa var. luteola
scitula
Stapelianthus baylissii
Trichocaulon mossamedense
Tridentea baylissii (Leach) Leach var. ciliata
R.H. ARCHER*
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XlOl, Pretoria (X)01.
Bothalia 27,1:97-99 (1997)
Book Reviews
TREE ATLAS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA/BOOMATLAS VAN SUIDER-
AFRIKA. Section/Seksie 1, compiled by PTUED & JUTTA VON BREITEN-
BACH. 1992. Dendrological Foundation, RO. Box 104, Pretoria 0001.
Pp. 226. Hard cover: ISBN 0620105046, price R3 12.00.
....‘in every way a larger than life character’. This is how Hugh Glen
and Mienkie Welman describe Dr Friedrich von Breitenbach in his obitu-
ary published in Bothalia 25: 260-264 (1995). The scope of the many
achievements of this man of global vision and unquenchable determina-
tion, enthusiasm and single-mindedness equally tended to be beyond what
could or would be reasonably expected. The present work, judging by
its modest title, could be assumed to be little more than a collection of
distribution maps of the 1 000-odd species of trees found on the sub-
continent. Yet it turns out to be conceived and designed as the standard
reference work on the local tree flora — the encyclopaedia of southern
African trees.
The first step towards realization of this grand project was accom-
plished during the lifetime of Dr Fried: section 1 of a projected total of
24 sections, dealing with 1 077 tree species in 98 famiUes and 374 genera,
was published in 1992. It is dedicated to T.R. Sim, author of the first
standard work on South African trees. Its 226 pages cover the 31 tree
species among the ferns and gymnosperms recorded for the subcontinent.
For each species the following is provided (where relevant and/or
known): National Tree number, scientific name, synonyms, common
name (in up to 15 languages), description (detailed but in non-technical
language), wood, taxonomy, distribution, ecology, reproduction biology,
epiphytes, fungi, insects and mites, conservation, national list of Big
Trees, cultivation and names (explanation of meaning/origin of common
name). In addition, the following are given for each species: one or more
line drawings by Jutta von Breitenbach, two or more black-and-white
photographs, a colour photograph (only one species is not so illustrated
in the present section), a distribution map covering half a page and de-
picting distribution in terms of quarter-degree squares (one-sixteenth of
a one-degree square) as well as a table listing a single record, ‘usually
the earliest’, for each quarter-degree square. For widely occurring species
these lists occupy more than a page and one shudders to think what
space the list of Acacia karroo will take up. There are detailed family
and genus accounts with literature references and keys to species. No
indication is given of plans to provide keys, or other aids to the identi-
fication of families, once the whole work has been completed. Colour
photos are grouped together in the relevant genus account but are not
specifically referred to in the text.
The book is well bound in a hard cover and is provided with a white
dust cover with green print displaying title and contents, as well as the
globally significant logo of the Dendrological Foundation: arborum sil-
varumque conservatio salus mundi est — the conservation of trees and
forests is/will lead to, the prosperity/happiness/welfare/salvation/redemp-
tion (the German word ‘Heil’, and similarly, the Afrikaans ‘heil’, say it
much more succinctly) of the earth/mankind. The book, in A4 format,
was produced with the aid of DTP, with English text in the left-hand
column and Afrikaans on the right. Use of paper and general layout must
be described as lavish, especially in view of the vast volume of the
subject matter still to be dealt with and the high price of the first section.
The maps could be reduced in size and produced with the aid of the
MAPPIT computer program (available from the National Botanical In-
stitute, Pretoria), the tables of distribution records much condensed, if
not omitted or relegated to an appendix, the number of illustrations de-
creased and the layout of the work redesigned without loss of information
and, if expertly handled, without detracting from the appearance of the
work.
At a price of R3 12.00 (likely to be higher for future sections) one
feels that the market of the work is largely restricted to institutions, to
the most enthusiastic dendro-friends and to book collectors. But the pur-
chaser can be assured that he acquires a work packed with thoroughly
researched, comprehensive information on the dendroflora of the sub-
continent. If the project can be brought to a successful conclusion it
should indeed constitute the standard encyclopaedia of southern African
trees. We wish Jutta and her collaborators the resources, of various kind,
the energy and the time to bring this grand project to fruition.
O.A. LEISTNER
TROPICAL ALPINE ENVIRONMENTS— PLANT FORM AND
FUNCTION, edited by RE. RUNDELL, A.P. SMITH and FC. MEIN-
ZER. 1994. Cambridge University Press, The Edinburgh Building, Cam-
bridge CB2 2RU, UK. pp 376. Price, hard cover: £65.00, $100.00. ISBN
0-521-42089-X.
The tropic-alpine environments, with winter every night and summer
every day, are radically different climatically from any other environment
on our beloved, but abused planet. This appears to have resulted in some
rather peculiar plant growth forms, which imply intriguing ecophysiologi-
cal relationships, and consequently has excited scientific interest. The
isolated occurrence of these habitats on four widely scattered land masses:
Hawaii (rather marginally). South America, Africa and New Guinea, ef-
fectively provides four replicates of the natural climatic experiment.
The book aims explicitly to promote our understanding of the plant
form and function in the tropic-alpine regions. It is therefore not a de-
scriptive account, and there is little attempt at a complete regional cover
(there is only a single paper on work in the New Guinean alpine region),
or even a complete cover of the diversity of growth forms. The tropic-
alpine setting is almost incidental to the central issue of the relationships
between form and function in a peculiar environment.
The first chapters in the volume describe the tropic-alpine environ-
ments. Alan Smith’s excellent review of the tropic-alpine systems con-
stitutes a most readable chapter that stimulates a strong desire to travel
to these wonderful mountains. This is followed by a rather dry chapter
on the climates, full of useful information. The remaining 18 chapters
fall into two groups: the first deals with general problems and adaptations
(drought, temperature, anatomy), and the second constitutes reports of
case studies of individual tropic-alpine taxa: Polylepis, Isoetes, Senecio,
Espeletia, giant Lobelia, Argyroxiphium. These cover a range of eco-
physiological subjects, as well as a few studies of herbivory, and two
papers on reproductive biology. There is a single chapter on the tropic-
alpine region of New Guinea: clearly this area needs more attention,
especially if there is to be an attempt at arguing for convergence.
The main problems are thermoregulation and diurnal drought. Meinzer
et al. indicate how Espeletia species may control minimum temperatures
through a combination of growth form variation and leaf anatomy and
morphology by comparing species from different altitudes, and correlat-
ing morphological and anatomical differences with altitudinal-climatic
differences. In a second chapter they also deal with the drought issue,
again using Espeletia, showing that a mechanism of major importance
is capacitance, whereby plants store water to deal with a large transpi-
ration load in the early morning, when ground temperatures may be below
freezing. This is in agreement with Hedberg’s findings on the Den-
drosenecio species in Africa. However, Beck shows that the process is
more complex, and that many plant tissues in Dendrosenecio are freeze-
tolerant. He suggests that variables linked to freezing might be more
important in regulating species distribution patterns.
Goldstein et al. show that Polylepis deals with its environment by a
complex combination of ‘adaptations’ (implying morphology or anatomy
that differs from the common or general situation), allowing the plants
to utilize the early morning sun for photosynthesis, and to deal with low
night temperatures. It does not store water as the giant rosette plants do,
but tends to occupy more protected microsites.
98
Bothalia 27,1 (1997)
Draba also has a diversity of survival mechanisms. Some species,
like D. chionochloa, store enough water to transpire in the morning sun
while the ground is still frozen, whereas other species, like D. bellardii,
do not have this storage and are restricted to microsites where soil tem-
peratures do not drop below zero. This paper is based on a comparison
between the more buffered rocky habitats and the open paramo habitats.
Keeley et al. indulge in the bizarre when they document the extent
to which tropic-alpine species of Isoetes derive their carbon from sedi-
ments, rather than from atmospheric CO2. These species also completely
lack stomata, and have a CAM photosynthetic pathway capable of func-
tioning at or near freezing.
Miller investigated the role of pubescence in the inflorescences of
Puya, and in a series of careful comparative and experimental studies
shows that (a) the pubescence kept the flowers warmer and (b) warmer
flowers set more seed. This is in contrast to the situation of leaf pubes-
cence, which appears also to be related to increasing reflectance.
In one of the two papers on reproductive biology of tropic-alpine
plants. Berry and Calvo document a gradual shift from bees to hum-
mingbirds and anemophily with increasing altitude. Anemophily tends to
be associated with some degree of mast-flowering. Hybridization also
appears to be quite common, and Berry and Calvo suggest that habitat
specificity may maintain species integrity, rather than breeding barriers.
Smith & Young demonstrate many similarities in the reproductive biology
between African Dendrosenecio and South American Espeletia species,
including a seedling recruitment system that appears to have two ‘hur-
dles’ : the first massive bout of mortality occurs during the seedling’s first
dry season, and the second is the failure of the seedlings to become
caulescent in the presence of adults (is this a peculiar form of chemical
control?). Plants tend to take decades to become reproductive.
Forty year’s worth of data show that the ranges of the two giant
Lobelia species in the Teleki Valley of Mt Kenya have undergone some
dramatic changes, and Young, presenting these data, argues that occa-
sional extreme events may have profound effects on the demography of
these large plants. The fate of the giant Lobelia and Dendrosenecio on
Mt Kenya is also strongly influenced by the patterns of hyrax predation:
this is elegantly demonstrated by Young and Smith. This susceptibility
to extreme events reminds us of the Karoo.
This book is an excellent survey of the current understanding of the
ecophysiology of tropic-alpine plants. These bizarre plants provide a type
of null hypothesis against which other, more typical, growth forms can
be compared. I have a number of quibbles, which are with the approach,
rather than the content.
A sad phenomenon is the absence of any systematic-evolutionary
analysis of the evolution and origins of these weird floras. There are
frequent references to the evolutionary background of the floras, yet no
attempt is made to trace their origins and the route by which they acquired
these amazing adaptations. The advances made in this direction by the
work on the evolution of heterostyly are not utilized here. The book is
very much in the non-evolutionary mould of old ecophysiological studies,
and shows no signs of the new biology yet. This means that the route
by which these weird and wonderful adaptations were attained is not
traced.
The adaptive nature of some of the structures is not always evident
from the papers. Correlation of structure and environmental variables is
not a sound methodology. Much more convincing are the papers that
report the results of experimental manipulations. It is very evident from
this book that the study of tropic-alpine ecophysiology is still at an early
stage. Different plants appear to show different methods of dealing with
the same problems. Many of the presumed adaptations have not been
tested rigorously, and there has been rather little experimental work.
Striking is the lack of work by indigenous African botanists. Con-
sidering the proximity of Mt Kenya to Nairobi, with its four universities
and a large herbarium, this is a sad indictment, which strongly underlines
the need for capacity building on our fabulous continent, especially since
the pioneering work on tropic-alpine environments was done by Hedberg
in Africa,
Tropic-alpine environments arc often inaccessible, and evoke rather
romantic images, like ‘The mountains of the Moon’, the Andean Paramo,
and Mt Wilhelm in Papua New Guinea, which appeal to both scientists
and the general public. Few people have worked in all four areas, arid
this is the first book that brings together diverse papers from all of them.
It is therefore essential reading for anybody interested in the tropic-alpine
flora. Many of the papers are reviews by scientists who had previously
published several papers on their research, and as such it is a timely
book, providing an overview of the fascinating adaptations of tropic-al-
pine plants.
H.P. LINDER*
* Bolus Herbarium, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, South
Africa,
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION OF NEOTROPICAL MON-
TANE FORESTS, edited by S.P. CHURCHILL, H. BALSLEV, E.
FORERO & L. LUTEYN. 1995. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx,
New York 10458-5126, USA. Pp xiv + 702. Price, hard cover: $85.00.
ISBN 0-89327-400-3.
The New York Botanical Gardens hosted a symposium in June 1993 at
which the 52 papers published in this book were presented. The authors
are all intimately involved with the montane regions of the Neotropics
in a variety of ways. The ecosystems in focus: the montane forests of
the Neotropics, are under severe pressure and this is amply spelled out
in this volume. In terms of research, emphasis has generally been placed
on biodiversity and conservation of the lowland rainforests, whereas the
montane region has been neglected. Large areas of mountain forests have
been destroyed, resulting in dramatic fragmentation of the montane re-
gion. This is not only regrettable because of the simple loss of biodiver-
sity but also because the genetic base of many potentially important
medicinal and crop plants is lost or eroding rapidly. These inadequacies
are highlighted in the book and point to the need for much greater effort
to study and conserve the biodiversity of the montane Neotropics.
The book is dedicated to the memory of two outstanding neotropical
botanists, Alwyn Gentry and Linda Albert de Escobar. They were two
of four biologists killed in a light plane crash on 3 August 1993 in Ecua-
dor while involved with Conservation International’s Rapid Assessment
Programme. It is fitting tribute that a compendium of papers such as this
should honour their memory because they were so active in promoting
the cause of conservation of the tropical forests. Alwyn Gentry was par-
ticularly concerned with floristic inventory and ecological diversity of
tropical forests and his paper delivered at the symposium and published
posthumously, bears testimony to the energy and enthusiasm he displayed
in his chosen task. Other authors are no less dedicated and a continuous
thread throughout the different papers is the severe impact the activities
of man have had on the floral richness of the neotropical mountains over
a period of about five centuries. The most startling statistic is, that
whereas approximately 12% of the Amazonian rainforests have been de-
stroyed, about 12% is all that remains of the tropical montane ecosystems.
It is predicted that the future survival or demise of tropical highland
vegetation in South America will be determined during the next decade,
depending on whether effective conservation measures are instated or
not.
The work is divided into six sections, each with a brief editorial
summary. The first section sets the scene in that it explores the vegeta-
tional history from the Cretaceous to the Holocene.
Looking at this tableau as a palaeobotanist, you ask yourself: why
the extraordinary plant diversity in neotropical montane forests? And truly
extraordinary it is, with around one in every five species on Earth being
found there. How did this unique diversity arise? What do we know of
the history of the vegetation of this small and dynamic comer of our
planet’s surface? And what can we learn from all this?
Our answers to all these questions are patchy and embryonic. As
stated in the introduction to this volume: ‘An immense potential lies
ahead for the contributions that can be provided by evolutionary biolo-
gists’. Just four of 52 papers published in this admirable volume of 702
pages are devoted to the floral evolution of the Neotropics. These four
papers, covering the last 130 million years or so, from the Cretaceous
to the present, provide the merest glimpse at some of the most important
of all possible questions.
The first two contributions focus on the broad pattern of the floral
origins of this mountainous cornucopia; the second pair of papers home
in on the specific picture revealed in the sediments of the high plains of
Bogota (Colombia) over the past five million years. It is largely through
BothaIia27,l (1997)
99
the study of the fossil pollen record that the outline of the vegetation
history is told. Understanding the complex biogeographic processes — the
webs of cause and effect — will require modelling the myriad tectonic,
climatic and biological factors involved in the system. Between chaos
theory on the one hand and the solar constant!?) on the other, emerges,
through many millions of years, the extant reality of diversity and dis-
tribution.
The palaeovegetation has suffered frequent shifts in floristic com-
position. The Andean forests were subject to considerable change, as
shown particularly clearly for the past five million years — the interval
during which man was evolving from ape in Africa. Mountain building
has been episodic over the 130 million years discussed: with the centre
of Andean uplift shifting from south to north and west to east. The
southern Andes first arose around 100 million years back, whilst the
history of the northern stretch of the chain is confined to the latter
half of this period. The breakup of Gondwana and the shifting of
continental plates has played a critical role: ‘considerable interchange
[of floras] was possible between South America and Antartica until
the early Tertiary, between South America and Africa until the mid-
Cretaceous, and between South America and Meso- and North America
during the Late Tertiary’. Both mountain building and continental drift
dramatically affect climatic patterns. Environmental change drives
evolution, brings extinction and diversification.
The incredible floral richness of the tropical northern Andes com-
prises many immigrants from both north and south as well as many
families (17 of 40 with a known fossil record) that are centred there.
The mountainous terrain is both refugium for immigrants and centre of
diversification and radiation. The four papers reviewed have provided a
fine and stimulating glimpse — the merest glimpse — at the floral history
leading to this richness. There remains much to be learned why the Neo-
tropics are so very much richer than the tropics of Africa and southeast
Asia. Knowledge and understanding usually lead to love and devotion.
This volume and these papers must surely shift our global will closer to
preserving such a wonderful focal point of diversity within the biosphere
and to our reaping its full benefits.
The second section of the book documents a series of studies con-
cerning the inventory of the remarkable biological diversity. It includes
17 papers, only one of which deals with birds rather than plants. These
papers cover a wide range of topics pertaining to the common goal of
describing the patterns of species abundance and diversity as well as the
structure of the plant communities in question. Useful information about
patterns of endemism is also provided; the serious student of diversity
would do well to pay attention to these papers; they provide a good
source for comparison with other species-rich ecosystems in the world.
It may come as a surprise to some to find a whole section (section
three) on the taxonomic diversity of cryptogamic plants. However, the
extraordinary high diversity of these plants in the montane forests of the
Neotropics, and the important ecological role they play in montane eco-
systems, fully warrant such an inclusion. The first two papers describe
diversity in selected genera of Agaricales (fungi) in Quercus forests
(Mueller & Hailing), and in lichens of the Colombian montane forests
(Sipman). Although the neotropical fungi, and to a lesser extent lichens,
are very incompletely known, the studies show that the potential diversity
is high. An analysis of distribution patterns in selected groups of fungi
reveals great potential endemism, while almost half of the lichens studied
have a wide distribution throughout the tropics.
Bryophytes are better known and diversity for the tropical Andes is
exceedingly high, estimated at 1 500-1 700 species distributed among 343
genera and 75 families for mosses (ChurchiU, Griffin & Lewis), and
800-900 species in 1 35 genera and 42 families for liverworts (Gradstein).
The Andes may be four times as rich in liverworts, and eight times as rich
in mosses as the surrounding tropical lowland areas, and the highest species
diversity is in the upper montane forest, roughly between 2 500 and 3 300
m. The reason for this high diversity is thought to be topographic relief
which provides favourable habitats and climatic conditions for bryophytes.
This section gives a good overview of cryptogamic plant diversity in the
montane Neotropics and emphasizes the need to accelerate exploration
and taxonomic revision in this fascinating group of plants.
The amazing taxonomic diversity of the Neotropics is well described
in the fourth section. One paper deals with ferns, one with the Lycopo-
diaceae and the remaining 1 3 with flowering plants in a variety of families:
Theaceae, Bonnetiaceae, Symplocaceae, Rosaceae, Onagraceae, Araliaceae,
Asclepiadaceae, Rubiaceae, Asteraceae, Arecaceae, Poacae (Bambuseae)
and HeUconiaceae. The editorial commentary on this section particularly
highlights the plight of plant systematics in the Neotropics, where it is
estimated that it will take almost another 500 years to complete the taxo-
nomic treatment of flowering plants in the Flora neotropica. It is clear that
among plants many unknown species, perhaps some unknown genera and
even some unknown families, may become extinct before even being dis-
covered. This potentially great loss underlies the plaintive cry to train and
encourage more young taxonomists and comparative biologists who could
change this negative condition and foster knowledge of tropical biology and
more particularly of the tropical highland flora.
The fifth section concerns the human impact and utilization of the mon-
tane environments. Disturbance of the montane ecosysteins goes a long way
back in history. However, the human need for physiological stimulants
(drugs!) in various forms has produced the modem ever-increasing demand
for such substances as caffeine, cocaine and morphine. Illegal opium plan-
tations cover 20 000 ha in Colombia and coca cultivation results in the
annual destruction of 1 000-2 (XX) ha of forest. In Colombia, what was
once a major centre of plant diversity in the 900-2 000 m elevation zone,
is the 'coffee zone'. Add to this the global desire for hardwoods, and
the result is a tragic tale of rapid destruction of montane forests, particu-
larly in Colombia, Bolivia and Ecuador. Only a decreased demand for
habit-forming substances in the developed world will reduce the contin-
ued transformation of montane forests.
The final section appropriately starts with a paper by Thomas van
der Hammen entitled ‘Global change, biodiversity, and conservation of
neotropical montane forests’. At a time when global changes are occur-
ring in climate, geology and sociology, it is fitting that a paper such as
this succinctly focuses on the response by both plants and man to these
changes. Using the example of the destruction of Andean montane forests,
suggestions are made as to what should be done to conserve what little
is left after the historical depredations of man and the impact of future
far-reaching changes of global change. The lessons learned apply globally
and it is up to us to recognize the warning signs and respond positively
in order to stem the tide of global degradation and attrition of biodiversity.
Ethnobotany is of common concern at a global scale and it is true
that in many places many useful plants that are known and many plants
that are potentially useful have been lost through habitat transformation
and overexploitation. This is true in Africa, Asia and no less in South
America. The paper by AnneMarie Sprensen and Inge Schjellerup, shows
clearly how dependent the peasant community of Chachapoyas people
in the district of Chuquibamba, is on natural products from the montane
forests. The prognosis is not good — as the forest disappears so too do
the natural resources upon which the peasants depend. The potential
pointers to valuable products for modem medicine and improved food
crops can also be lost in this process.
The main aim of this book is to encourage the conservation of the
neotropical montane region. It is well edited and admirably succeeds in
not only introducing the Neotropics to the uninitiated but also in provid-
ing a wealth of information about the region. It has a useful index even
though the scientific names are not included. The book heightens the
awareness of the need for concerted global effort and responsibility if
there is to be any hope of survival for the neotropical vegetation with
its great diversity.
D.J. MCDONALD*, J.H. ANDERSON** (palaeobotany)
and J. VAN ROOY** (cryptogams)
* Ecology & Conservation, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X7,
7735 Claremont, Cape Town.
** National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XlOl, 0001 Pretoria.
r.0
I - .*,^. - fr^-..- »
JIMM
<||M» -
ffegyiaW I' i 1
.■••i^-Mi».,-r :a ..xi*,i8wj#i . ...
■> w '
- . 1.4. •n*a»
'4^
.■ll■|1 ti*i^ 1 1 : ^,,. ,. „ u ..-'-Jt <»■
~4 n#* ^ ' ‘c; - . .-wa^.-iki, ;*^'
.,
v.y r. ..w»y
:vT"s<fcVi£ .
.■'A-Wfl'.l?';
? •ifcifV-
^k''-
2. ti.r-fr. -■ f’4*«i|i||pik4i^'t
fi»^ -(tj;
^ ^ »4^^^iplt|Jllli" »;
r-'v.f^,/< .,, > vk../ H(p»^ Mrif
f, •e^f'i'Vtir <
T -r;
.- V(j* '> >•)»
».• ■» ■'V* ..iMii'*' -.1.
'*-''■■* fjjWii*/ (■••• , •-ak',
r> - -<(,w!n''
MICWi
JW
'-1— ■'■ *' V
»- -t#
■ ..I- T < - '»^iyiMr.’
lit . -:.<- f^^m.
- !- 'fc ^ * ■ '’
U<
V'Viv ,
'«' Jl 4#.r ■ ’l^v''lt**fTI^ P— — a;: ■
w*^t ' - " ' u' ’ '
■ Ai
'\l 4\JS0t ' ^ i
- '■■
* ». . jjv I^njjni ^
• ■'“ ■'V 4^. -iifr^ 0^-
tv ,. t .■ r •m)iim0mti ' ' > -sf' «tq» 'r«.tp>
* ' -'Ai. -**'rt’.--AS!' ' ' ’ifVr^,
V .t - ■~im- :f '*iV"V ♦' • "'■■i™’
.r-* '..- ♦>
...V,. .-• .^:
^ f*'V .ft *t! Mf.f
■* V9’'^>'€yiv#w
^ i’ VJI/ ./ Iirf
l«- <aHi in4,,.'W. nJ* ' “ •■■; ■■
., - .J-^'": LJ^- .
#■ i5j rs
■'’ IjW*'* ^ j t
■ rat* ’*• ''■ ♦• •"piw"
.:■ - » »»r. »* , : i. ..^ *»- f i*ff0 ■
- V*, !, • . -f-
i »* r * «1
^■' * '
♦fi ’■'^•►..J; I** tSl^iS'V
./t
f
' ^ii .;-JUfT|fwS.
-r- .
Vi ir;««ir ^-. . -
- .. i -K'.^ u;.c »l|^.
i»«K V* «lk'*ioS'.ir-i^
.'4\‘
. -, Off* < -
^ -jr .,-•*« is ■•■sjwwr » ,
*■' ^ .IS. Ij^^i
NOW AVAILABLC
BOTHALIA — Contents to vols 21-25
by B.A. Momberg &l J.M. Mulvenna
comprising:
List of papers alphabetically arranged according to senior author and dates and including all co-authors
in alphabetical listing.
Subject index compiled from keywords and titles, with reference to individual articles.
Price: R10,00 (inch VAT, excl. postage)
BOTHALIA — Contents to vols 1-20
by H.F. Glen, B.A. Momberg &c E. Potgieter (1991)
comprising:
a brief history of Bothalia; a list of all papers published; a list of all authors, co-authors, keywords and
titles; and tables with publication dates, major subjects covered and some information on authors.
Price: R9,10 (inch VAT, excl. postage)
Available from the Bookshop
National Botanical Institute
Private Bag XlOl
Pretoria 0001
RSA
Tel. (012) 804-3200 Fax. (012) 804-3211
BOTHALIA
Volume 27,1
May 1997
CONTENTS
1. Notes on Plectranthus (Lamiaceae) from southern Africa. E.J. VAN JAARSVELD and TJ. ED-
WARDS 1
2. Five new species of Lachenalia (Hyacinthaceae) from arid areas of South Africa. G.D. DUNCAN 7
3. Studies in the liverwort genus Fossombronia (Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 1. Three new
species from Northern Province, Gauteng and Mpumalanga. S.M. PEROLD 17
4. Studies in the liverwort genus Fossombronia (Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 2. An amendment
to three species from Western Cape, described by S.W. Arnell. S.M. PEROLD 29
5. Studies in the liverwort genus Fossombronia (Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 3. An amendment
io F spinifolia. S.M. PEROLD 39
6. Notes of African plants:
Apiaceae (Umbelliferae). A new name for a South African Peucedanum. B.L. BURTT 51
Asteraceae. New combination in Dicoma. S. ORTIZ, J. RODRIGUEZ-OUBINA and I. PUL-
GAR 48
Boraginaceae. The taxonomic status of Lobostemon horridus. M.H. BUYS and J.J.A. VAN DER
WALT 55
Fabaceae. A survey of antipodals in the gametophyte of the tribes Podalyrieae and Liparieae.
A.L. SCHUTTE 43
Proteaceae. A new species of Leucadendron from the western Little Karoo. J.P. ROURKE. . . 52
Rubiaceae. A new species of Vangueria from the Soutpansberg. N. HAHN 45
Thymelaeaceae. New combinations in Lac/tntz^fl. J.B.P. BEYERS 45
Vitaceae. A new species of Rhoicissus from the Eastern Cape. E. RETIEF and E. J. VAN
JAARSVELD 49
7. Composition and biogeography of forest patches on the inland mountains of the southern Cape. C.J.
GELDENHUYS 57
8. Cytogenetic studies in some representatives of the subfamily Pooideae (Poaceae) in South Africa. 3.
The tribe Poeae. J.J. SPIES, S.M.C. VAN WYK, I.C. NEMAN and E.J.L. LIEBENBERG . . 75
9. Comparative field performance of three different gas exchange systems. G.F. MIDGLEY, M. VESTE,
D.J. VON WILLERT, G.W. DAVIS, M. STEINBERG and L.W. POWRIE 83
10. Obituary: LeslieCharles Leach (1909-1996). R.H. ARCHER 91
11. Book reviews 97
Ab.stracted, indexed or li.sted in • AETFAT Index • AGRICOLA • BIOSIS: Biological Ab,stract.s/RRM • CAB: Herbage Ab.stract.<i, Field Crop
Abstract. 1 • CAB.S : Current Advances in Plant Science • LSI : Current Contents, Scisearch, Re.search Aleti • Kew Record of Taxonomic Literature • Taxon :
Reviews and notices.
ISSN 0006 8241
© Published by and obtainable from: National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XlOl , Pretoria 0001, South Africa. Typesetting and page layout:
S.S. Brink (NBI). Reproduction & printing: Afri.scot Litho (Pty) Ltd, P.O. Box 23663, Innesdale, 0031 Pretoria. Tel. (012) 331-3698/9. Fax (012) 331-1747.