Bothalia
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Vol. 28,2
October 1998
TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE NATIONAL BOTANICAL INSTITUTE,
PRETORIA
Obtainable from the National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001, Republic of
South Africa. A catalogue of all available publications will be issued on request.
BOTHALIA
Bothalia is named in honour of General Louis Botha, first Premier and Minister of Agriculture of
the Union of South Africa. This house journal of the National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, is devot-
ed to the furtherance of botanical science. The main fields covered are taxonomy, ecology, anato-
my and cytology. Two parts of the journal and an index to contents, authors and subjects are pub-
lished annually.
Two booklets of the contents (a) to Vols 1-20 and (b) to Vols 21-25, are available.
STRELITZIA
A series of occasional publications on southern African flora and vegetation, replacing Memoirs of
the Botanical Survey of South Africa and Annals of Kirstenbosch Botanic Gardens.
MEMOIRS OF THE BOTANICAL SURVEY OF SOUTH AFRICA
The memoirs are individual treatises usually of an ecological nature, but sometimes dealing with
taxonomy or economic botany. Published: Nos 1-63 (many out of print). Discontinued after No. 63.
ANNALS OF KIRSTENBOSCH BOTANIC GARDENS
A series devoted to the publication of monographs and major works on southern African flora.
Published: Vols 14-19 (earlier volumes published as Supplementary volumes to the Journal of
South African Botany). Discontinued after Vol. 19.
FLOWERING PLANTS OF AFRICA (FPA)
This serial presents colour plates of African plants with accompanying text. The plates are prepared
mainly by the artists at the National Botanical Institute. Many well known botanical artists have
contributed to the series, such as Cythna Letty (over 700 plates), Kathleen Lansdell, Stella Gower,
Betty Connell, Peter Bally, Fay Anderson, Ellaphie Ward-Hilhorst and Gillian Condy. The Editor
is pleased to receive living plants of general interest or of economic value for illustration.
From Vol. 55, twenty plates are published at irregular intervals.
An index to Vols 1-49 is available.
FLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA (FSA)
A taxonomic treatise on the flora of the Republic of South Africa, Lesotho, Swaziland, Namibia
and Botswana. The FSA contains descriptions of families, genera, species, infraspecific taxa, keys
to genera and species, synonymy, literature and limited specimen citations, as well as taxonomic
and ecological notes.
Contributions to the FSA also appear in Bothalia.
PALAEOFLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA
A palaeoflora on a pattern comparable to that of the Flora of southern Africa. Much of the infor-
mation is presented in the form of tables and photographic plates depicting fossil populations. Now
available:
Molteno Formation (Triassic) Vol. I . Introduction. Dicroidium, by J.M. & H.M. Anderson.
Molteno Formation (Triassic) Vol. 2. Gymnosperms (excluding Dicroidium), by J.M. & H.M.
Anderson.
Prodromus of South African Megafloras. Devonian to Lower Cretaceous, by J.M. & H.M.
Anderson. Obtainable from: A. A. Balkema Marketing, Box 3 1 7, Claremont 7735, RSA.
BOTHALIA
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Volume 28,2
Scientific Editor: G. Germishuizen
Technical Editor: B.A. Momberg
NATIONAL
Botanical
INSTITUTE
2 Cussonia Avenue, Brummena, Pretoria
Private Bag XI 01, Pretoria 0001
nasionale bota n
instituut
P^e'^Tg X101 -
p 1938-})- a?
^nyaatsak X 101 pRETOR,
ISSN 0006 8241
October 1998
Editorial Board
D.F. Cutler
B.J. Huntley
P.H. Raven
J.P. Rourke
M.J. Werger
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK
National Botanical Institute, Cape Town, RSA
Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, USA
Compton Herbarium, NBI, Cape Town, RSA
University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
CONTENTS
Volume 28,2
New species and combinations in Bothalia 28,? (1998)
1. Five new species of Lachenalia (Hyacinthaceae) from arid areas of Namibia and South Africa. G.D.
DUNCAN 131
2. A revision of Lachenalia (Hyacinthaceae) in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. A.P. DOLD and
P.B. PHILLIPSON 141
3. FSA contributions 12: Plantaginaceae. H.F. GLEN 151
4. Studies in the liverwort genus Fossombronia (Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 6. New spe-
cies from Lesotho, Swaziland and Mpumalanga and new records from Lesotho. S.M. PEROLD 159
5. The genus Echiutn (Boraginaceae) in southern Africa. E. RETIEF and A.E. VAN WYK 167
6. A revision of Ledebouria (Hyacinthaceae) in South Africa. 2. Two new species, L. crispa and L. par-
vifolia, and L. macowanii re-instated. S. VENTER and T.J. EDWARDS 179
7. Notes on African plants:
Acanthaceae/Orchidaceae. New records from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. T.J. EDWARDS
and E. HARRISON 187
Amaryllidaceae: Amaryllideae. A new species of Amaryllis from the Richtersveld, South Africa.
D.A. SNIJMAN and G. WILLIAMSON 192
Asteraceae. Key to the species of the genus Hertia in southern Africa. P.P.J. HERMAN 192
Cyperaceae. Coleochloa setifera new to the flora of KwaZulu-Natal. C. ARCHER 190
Metzgeriales-Fossombroniaceae. Fossombronia occidento-africana : is it conspecific with
F. indical S.M. PEROLD ' 183
8. A reconnaissance survey of the vegetation of the North Luangwa National Park, Zambia. P.P. SMITH 197
9. Wetland plant communities in the Potchefstroom Municipal Area, North-West, South Africa. S.S.
CILLIERS. L.L. SCHOEMAN and G.J. BREDENKAMP 213
10. Cytogenetic studies in the genus Pentaschistis (Poaceae: Arundinoideae). K.C. KLOPPER, J.J. SPIES
and B. VISSER 231
11. Obituaries:
David Spencer Hardy (1931-1998). H.F. GLEN 239
Barend Petrus Barkhuizen (1921-1995): amateur botanist, succulent plant specialist and edu-
cator. G.F. SMITH and E.M.A. STEYN 243
Mary Elizabeth Connell (1917-1997). D.J.B. KILLICK 245
12. National Botanical Institute, South Africa: administration and research staff 22 May 1998, publica-
tions 1 April 1997-31 March 1998. Compiler: B.A. MOMBERG 249
13. Guide for authors to Bothalia 261
14. The history of the Botanical Research Institute 1903-1989. DENISE FOURIE 271
New species and combinations in Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
Amaryllis paradisicola Snijman, sp. nov., 193
Fossombronia angulifolia Perold , sp. nov., 159
Fossombronia swaziensis Perold , sp. nov., 162
Lachenalia attenuata W.F. Barker ex G.D. Duncan, sp. nov., 132
Lachenalia doleritica G.D. Duncan, sp. nov., 134
Lachenalia lactosa G.D. Duncan, sp. nov., 135
Lachenalia leipoldtii G.D. Duncan, sp. nov., 137
Lachenalia nutans G.D. Duncan, sp. nov., 131
Ledebouria crispa S. Venter, sp. nov., 179
Ledebouria macowanii (Baker) S. Venter, comb, nov., 181
Ledebouria parvifolia S. Venter, sp. nov., 180
IV
Bothalia 28,2: 131-139 (1998)
Five new species of Lachenalia (Hyacinthaceae) from arid areas of
Namibia and South Africa
G.D, DUNCAN*
Keywords: Hyacinthaceae, Lachenalia , Namibia, new species. South Africa
ABSTRACT
Five new species of Lachenalia are described: L. nutans G.D. Duncan from southwestern Namibia, L. attenuata
W.F.Barker ex G.D. Duncan from the Roggeveld Plateau, Little Karoo and southern Cape; L. doleritica G.D. Duncan from
the Bokkeveld Plateau; L. lactosa G.D. Duncan from the Lowland Fynbos of the Hermanus District, and L. leipoldtii
G.D. Duncan from the Olifants River Valley and Little Karoo.
INTRODUCTION
This is the third in a series of papers on new species
of Lachenalia , and serves as a continuation of the work
of W.F. Barker (Barker 1978, 1979, 1983a & b, 1984,
1987, 1989) and the present author (Duncan 1987, 1988a
& b, 1989a & b, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1996, 1997a & b)
towards a revision of the genus.
Lachenalia nutans G.D. Duncan, sp. nov. L.
anguineae Sweet affinis propter flores similares campan-
ulatos albos tumoribus flavo-virentibus vel brunneo-
virentibus, sed floribus distincte nutantibus staminibus
declinatis folioque lanceolato vel late lanceolato pagina
inferiore glauca margine atromarronino basi subterranea
amplectenti differt.
TYPE. — Southwestern Namibia, 2715 (Bogenfels):
2.5 km NE of Schlafkuppe, on sandy gravel flats, (-BD),
21-7-1986. N.J. van Berkel 563 (NBG, holo.!).
Deciduous, winter-growing geophyte 35-110 mm
high. Bulb subglobose, 10-20 mm diam., white with thin
layer of reddish brown, membranous outer scales. Leaf
solitary, lanceolate to broadly lanceolate, 30-60 x
4-20 mm, erect or suberect, upper surface unmarked,
dark green with depressed longitudinal veins, lower sur-
face glaucous, unmarked or barred with dark green trans-
verse bands, margin dark maroon; clasping base white,
subterranean, 20-55 mm long. Inflorescence racemose,
dense, 40-55 mm long with a very short sterile tip;
peduncle erect, 25^40 mm long, sturdy, pale green,
mottled with dull purplish red spots, slightly to conspic-
uously swollen towards apex, and at base of inflores-
cence; rachis 35-45 mm long, pale green in lower half,
with dull purplish red spots, shading to white in upper
half, with sporadic, much paler spots, slightly to con-
spicuously swollen in lower half; pedicels erect to
suberect during flowering, bending downwards during
fruiting, white, 2-5 mm long; bracts white, cup-like at
base of inflorescence, becoming lanceolate above,
1.0-1. 5 mm long. Flowers oblong-campanulate, distinct-
* National Botanical Institute, Kirstenbosch, Private Bag X7, 7735
Claremont, Cape Town.
MS. received: 1997-11-14.
ly nodding or cernuous, white with yellowish green or
brownish green gibbosities; perianth tube white, 3-4 mm
long; outer tepals oblong, 4-6 x 2.5 mm, white with yel-
lowish green or brownish green gibbosities, and pale
greenish zone at base; inner tepals narrowly spathulate,
4-6 x 1.0-1. 5 mm, white with pale greenish yellow zone
near apex. Stamens well exserted beyond tip of perianth,
declinate; filaments white, 6-10 mm long; anthers yel-
low. Ovary obovoid, pale green, 2-3 mm long; style
white, 7-9 mm long, protruding well beyond stamens as
ovary enlarges. Capsule obovoid, 4-6 x 4 mm. Seed
black, glossy with granulated testa, 1.5 mm long, globose
with small ridged arillode 0.3 mm long and distinct
decurrent keel. Flowering time-: July to August. Figures
1A; 2 & 3.
Etymology: named L. nutans to describe the distinctly
nodding flowers.
Diagnostic characters
L. nutans is characterised by a dense, racemose inflor-
escence of distinctly nodding, oblong-campanulate
flowers with the inner tepals as long as, or very slightly
longer than the outer tepals. The declinate stamens are
very well exserted and the upper part of the peduncle
and the lower part of the rachis is slightly to conspicu-
ously swollen. The plant has a solitary, lanceolate or
broadly lanceolate leaf with a dark green upper surface,
a glaucous lower surface and a white, deep subterranean
clasping base.
L. nutans is related to L. anguinea Sweet which
occurs in deep red sand from the Richtersveld as far
south as the Piketberg District. L. anguinea has similar
campanulate white flowers with yellowish green or
brownish green gibbosities and well exserted white sta-
mens. It differs, however, in being a larger plant with
much smaller, patent flowers produced on very long
pedicels, and its long, arcuate, deeply canaliculate, flac-
cid leaf. The seeds of L. anguinea also differ from those
of L. nutans in having a very small, almost obsolete, ter-
minal ridged arillode, whereas the seeds of L. nutans
have a granulated testa and a distinct decurrent keel. The
two species are also separated geographically, L. nutans
being known only from southwestern Namibia.
132
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 1. — A, Lachenalia nutans, Van Berkel 563; B, L. attenuata, Saunders s.n.', C, L. doleritica, Manning s.n. Scale bars: 10 mm.
Distribution and habitat
Lachenalia nutans is known from two collections
made in southwestern Namibia. In August 1929, Dinter
collected material of Lachenalia klinghardtiana Dinter at
Haalenberg which was deposited at B, K and PRE
{Dinter 6666). However, one of the two herbarium sheets
of this collection housed at B is in fact not L. klinghard-
tiana but represents the first collection of Lachenalia
nutans. The specimens of the latter species are in a fruit-
ing stage and the collecting date is given as 31st August
1929, whereas the collecting date given for the other
sheet correctly identified as L. klinghardtiana is 30th
August. Fifty-seven years later, Mrs N.J. Van Berkel col-
lected (lowering material of L. nutans further south at a
locality northeast of Schlafkuppe (Figure 4), which is
now the type material of the species. Plants grow singly
or in groups on sandy gravel flats in full sun. The typi-
cally deep-seated bulbs probably only grow and flower if
there has been sufficient seasonal rainfall.
Material examined
NAMIBIA.— 2615 (Luderitz): Haalenberg, (-DA), 31-8-1929,
Dinter 6666 (B). 2715 (Bogenfels): 2.5 km NE of Schlafkuppe, (-BD),
21-7-1986, Van Berkel 563 (NBG).
Lachenalia attenuata W.F. Barker ex G.D. Duncan,
sp. nov. L. hirtae (Thunb.) Thunb. affinis propter flores
similares pallide azureos oblongos vel oblongo-campanu-
latos segmentis interiores perianthii viridi-flavis tumor-
ibus purpureo-brunneis staminibusque inclusis, sed pedi-
cellis multo brevioribus folioque conduplicato sine setis
vel papillis et basi folii non distincte dilatata differt.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3319 (Worcester): Keisie-
berg, Montagu Dist., (-DB), Sept. 1946, G.J. Lewis 2431
(SAM, holo!).
Deciduous, winter-growing geophyte 65-220 mm
high. Bulb globose, 8-10 mm diam., white with hard,
dark brown outer tunics. Leaf solitary, linear, attenuate,
conduplicate, clasping base of peduncle up to 50 mm
long, pale green shading to yellowish green in upper half,
with short, darker green bands on lower surface, upper
surface unmarked, spreading to suberect, 35-140 x
7-10 mm, clasping base marked with magenta bands just
below ground level, shading to brownish purple and pale
green at, and just above ground level, respectively.
Inflorescence subspicate or racemose, few to many- flow-
ered, very lax, 20-60 mm long, with very short sterile
tip; peduncle erect to suberect, very slender, 35-200 mm
long, very pale green in lower half and mottled with
brownish purple blotches, shading to yellowish green or
brownish purple in upper half, with or without brownish
purple blotches; rachis heavily mottled with brownish
purple, shading to pale blue at apex, 20-60 mm long;
pedicels white or brownish purple, spreading or suberect,
1-3 mm long; bracts ovate to obovate, 1-3 x 1-3 mm.
Flowers patent to slightly cernuous, oblong to oblong-
campanulate, pale blue and greenish yellow with pur-
plish brown markings; perianth tube pale blue, 2 mm
long; outer tepals oblong, 6-7 x 3-4 mm, pale blue at
base, shading to dull purplish brown at lips, with dull
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
133
purplish brown gibbosities; inner tepals protruding well
beyond outer tepals, obovate, dull white at base shading
to greenish yellow at apex, with distinct brownish green
keels, 6-7 x 4-5 mm, upper two inner tepals overlap-
ping. Stamens declinate, included or very slightly exsert-
ed; filaments white, 6-7 mm long; anthers maroon prior
to anthesis, yellow at anthesis, and black after anthesis.
Ovary ovoid, pale green, 3-4 x 3 mm; style white, 7 mm
long, protruding beyond stamens as ovary enlarges.
Capsule ovoid, 6-7 x 5-6 mm. Seed globose, 1 mm long,
dull black, with a ribbed arillode 0.7 mm long.
Flowering time: August to September. Figures IB; 5.
Etymology : named L. attenuata by W.F. Barker to de-
scribe the gradually tapering leaf.
Diagnostic characters
L. attenuata is characterised by a subspicate or race-
mose, very lax inflorescence of patent or slightly cernu-
FIGURE 2. — Sheet of Lachenalia
nutans, Dinter 6666 (B),
material collected on 31-8-
1929.
ous, oblong or oblong-campanulate flowers with the
inner tepals protruding well beyond the outer. The decli-
nate stamens are included or very slightly exserted, and
the plant has a single linear, attenuate, conduplicate leaf
with an unmarked upper surface, the lower surface
marked with short green bands, and the clasping leaf
base marked with brownish purple bands above ground
level, and with magenta bands below ground level.
L. attenuata is related to L. hirta (Thunb.) Thunb. var.
hirta which has similar oblong or oblong-campanulate
pale blue flowers with greenish yellow inner tepals and
included or slightly exserted stamens, and a single linear
leaf with brownish purple and magenta bands on the
clasping leaf base. L. hirta differs in having very long
pedicels and a canaliculate leaf with distinct bristles and
papillae on the lower surface and margins. The seeds of
L. hirta differ in having an almost obsolete, terminal aril-
lode, and a finely netted testa. The distribution ranges of
the two species do not overlap, L. hirta occurring from
134
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 3. — Holotype of Lachenaliu nutans, Van Berkel 563.
HKBMtnat HCSEt Al ST*t) \iW\M
FIGURE 5. — Holotype of Lachenaliu attenuata, Lewis 2431.
Namaqualand southwards to Malmesbury, and L. attenu-
ata occurring on the Roggeveld Plateau, the Little Karoo
and the southern Cape.
Distribution and habitat
L. attenuata was first collected by Dr J. Muir in
August 1933 in the Riversdale District of the southern
Cape, and represents the most easterly record of this
FIGURE 4. — Distribution of Lachenaliu nutans. A; L. attenuata, •; L.
doleritica, ★.
poorly collected, but fairly widespread species. It is also
known from three recent collections made on the
Roggeveld Plateau, and a further three records from the
Little Karoo (Figure 4). It grows in montane habitats
where it is usually encountered growing singly in south-
facing, seasonally moist, well-drained loamy clay soil
amongst rocks.
Material examined
NORTHERN CAPE. — 3220 (Sutherland): Farm Agterkop,
Gannaga Pass, (-AA), Sept. 1996, Saunders s.n. sub NBG755601
(NBG); mountain S of Voelfontein farmhouse, (-AD), Sept. 1981,
Snijman 515 (NBG); Farm Jakhals Valley, Verlatekloof Pass, (-DA),
Sept 1986, Cloete & Haselau 238 (NBG).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): Hex River Pass, W of sum-
mit, (-BD), Sept. 1974, Nordenstam & Lundgren 2059 (NBG);
Rabiesberg, NE of Nuy, (-DA), Sept. 1935, Lewis & Esterhuysen s.n.
sub BOL21949 (BOL); Keisieberg, Montagu Dist., (-DB), Sept. 1946,
Lewis 2431 (SAM); 3421 (Riversdale): Riversdale Dist., (-AB), Aug.
1933, Muir 4886 (K).
Lachenalia doleritica G.D. Duncan, sp. nov. L.
neilii W.F.Barker ex G.D. Duncan affinis propter inflo-
rescentiam similarem multifloram floribus virellis oblon-
go-campanulatis patentibus vel suberectis tumoribus
atroviridis vel brunneis, folios plerumque immaculatos
venis longiludinalibus distincte depressis, sed staminibus
inclusis foliisque ovatis arcuatis non glaucis, bulbo sine
annulo bulbillorum basi differt.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
135
FIGURE 6. — Holotype of Lachenalia doleritica, Thomas s.n.
TYPE. — Northern Cape, 3119 (Calvinia): Akkeren-
dam Nature Reserve, Calvinia, (-BD), 7-9-1984, M.L.
Thomas s.n. sub NBG140212 (NBG, holo.!).
Deciduous, winter-growing geophyte 120-180 mm
high. Bulb subglobose, 15-20 mm diam., white with sev-
eral layers of dark brown outer tunics. Leaves 2, ovate,
85 x 40 mm, fleshy, slightly arcuate, with leaf tips rest-
ing at ground level, bright green to yellowish green,
upper surface unmarked, with distinct, depressed longi-
tudinal veins, lower surface unmarked, margins coria-
ceous, dark maroon; clasping base white below, shading
to greenish white above, 30-40 mm long. Inflorescence
racemose, erect, many-flowered, 80-110 mm long, with
a short sterile tip; peduncle sturdy, erect or suberect,
40-100 mm long, becoming slightly swollen in upper
third, pale green and unmarked, or pale green in lower
two thirds with tiny pale brown speckles, tinged with
dull brownish mauve in upper third; rachis pale green or
tinged with dull brownish mauve, slightly swollen in
lower third; pedicels suberect, pale green or pale mau-
vish white, increasing in length towards apex of inflores-
cence, 2-4 mm long; bracts cup-shaped in lower half of
inflorescence, becoming lanceolate above, white, 3-5 x
2-4 mm. Flowers oblong-campanulate, patent or
suberect, very pale yellowish green with darker green,
very dark brown or brownish mauve markings; perianth
tube very pale yellowish green, 2-3 mm long; outer
tepals ovate, very pale yellowish green, 8-9 x 4-5 mm,
with darker green, very dark brown or brownish mauve
gibbosities, and a central yellowish green or brownish
mauve stripe; inner tepals obovate, protruding beyond
outer tepals, apices slightly recurved, 9-11 x 4-5 mm,
translucent yellowish green with a darker green or very
dark brown marking near apex, and brownish green
keels, inner lower tepals longer than two upper laterals.
Stamens included, declinate; filaments white, 9 mm
long; anthers pale maroon prior to anthesis, yellow at
anthesis. Ovary ovoid, pale green, 5x3 mm; style white,
7 mm long, protruding beyond tepals as ovary enlarges.
Capsule unknown. Seed unknown. Flowering time :
September to October. Figures 1C; 6.
Etymology, named L. doleritica to describe the heavy
doleritic clay soil in which this species occurs.
Diagnostic characters
L. doleritica is characterised by a many-flowered
racemose inflorescence of oblong-campanulate, patent or
suberect, yellowish green flowers with the inner tepals
protruding beyond the outer. The declinate stamens are
included, and the unmarked, ovate leaves are slightly
arcuate with the tips resting at ground level, and with dis-
tinct depressed longitudinal veins on the upper surface.
L. doleritica is related to L. neilii W.F.Barker ex
G.D. Duncan which has a similar many-flowered inflo-
rescence of greenish, patent or suberect, oblong-campan-
ulate flowers and usually unmarked leaves, with distinct
depressed longitudinal veins on the upper surface. L.
neilii differs in having smaller flowers with shortly
exserted stamens, lanceolate, suberect, glaucous leaves,
and the bulb produces a ring of bulbils at its base.
Distribution and habitat
The first recorded collection of L. doleritica was
made by Mrs M.L. Thomas as recently as September
1984 in the Akkerendam Nature Reserve at Calvinia, and
as far as I am aware, there are only two other records of
this species, one to the west of Calvinia towards
Nieuwoudtville, and the other to the east of Calvinia
towards Williston (Figure 4). L. doleritica appears to be
a rare species confined to heavy doleritic clay soil on the
Bokkeveld Plateau, where plants occur singly in open
situations in full sun. The apparently very restricted dis-
tribution range of this species overlaps the wider range of
the related L. neilii.
Material examined
NORTHERN CAPE. — 3119 (Calvinia): Calvinia-Nieuwoudtville
road, (R27), at side of road, (-AC), Sept. 1996, Manning s.n. (NBG,
photo.); Akkerendam Nature Reserve, Calvinia, (-BD), 7-9-1984,
Thomas s.n. sub NBG14021 2 (NBG); Calvinia-Williston road, at side
of road, (-BD), Oct. 1986, Thomas s.n. (NBG, photo.).
Lachenalia lactosa G.D. Duncan, sp. nov. L. peer-
sii Marloth ex W.F.Barker affinis propter flores albos
similares tumoribus viridi-brunneis foliosque ex mar-
roninos normaliter virides loratos, sed floribus valde
minoribus oblongo-campanulatis basibus pallide azureis
staminibusque declinatis paulo exsertis pedunculoque
leviter vel dense maculato differt.
136
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 7. — A, Lachenalia lactosa, Barker 10476', B, L. lactosa, Barker 10510. Scale bars: 10 mm.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3419 (Caledon): Honingklip
Farm, near Bot River, (-AC), 29-9-1967, W.F Barker
10510 (NBG, holo. ! ; PRE).
Deciduous, winter-growing geophyte 100-265 mm
high. Bulb globose, 8-15 mm diam., white with dark
brown outer tunics. Leaves 1 or 2, lorate, 40-200 x
5-18 mm, suberect or slightly arcuate, plain green, usu-
ally unmarked, occasionally marked with purplish brown
spots on upper surface, lower surface tinged with purple
or maroon, upper surface with distinct longitudinal
veins; clasping base white below, shading to pale
maroonish purple above, 10-20 mm long. Inflorescence
racemose, usually dense, few to many-flowered,
25-80 mm long, with short sterile apex; peduncle erect
or suberect, slender or sturdy, pale green with many
small to large purplish maroon spots or blotches,
50-130 mm long; rachis pale green with dull purplish
blue blotches; pedicels pale green, erect or suberect,
2- 4 mm long; bracts purplish maroon and cup-shaped at
base of inflorescence, becoming lanceolate and translu-
cent white above, 1-3 x 1-3 mm. Flowers small to very
small, oblong-campanulate, suberect or patent, white and
pale blue with dark magenta or greenish brown mark-
ings, fading to purplish blue; perianth tube very short,
pale blue or white, 0.5-1. 0 mm long; outer tepals ovate,
3- 4 x 5 mm, white, or pale blue at base, shading to white
above, with dark magenta or greenish brown gibbosities
and keels; inner tepals oblong obovate, 5-7 x 3 mm, pro-
truding well beyond outer segments, canaliculate, trans-
lucent white or cream with very narrow dark magenta or
greenish brown keels. Stamens shortly exserted, decli-
nate; filaments white, 4-6 mm long. Ovary ovoid, bright
green, 2-3 x 2 mm; style white, 4-5 mm long. Capsule
ovoid, membranous, 5-6 x 4-5 mm. Seed globose, shiny
black, 1 mm long, with a terminal, inflated arillode
0.5 mm long. Flowering time : September to October.
Figures 7A, B; 8.
Etymology, named L. lactosa to describe the milky white
colouring of the flowers.
Diagnostic characters
L. lactosa is characterised by a dense raceme of small
or very small, oblong-campanulate, suberect or patent,
white and pale blue flowers with shortly exserted, decli-
nate stamens. The peduncle is usually heavily marked
with purplish maroon spots or blotches, and the one or
two lorate, suberect or slightly arcuate leaves are plain
green, usually unmarked, with depressed longitudinal
veins on the upper surface, and tinged with purple or
maroon on the lower surface.
L. lactosa is related to L. peersii Marloth ex W.F.
Barker, which has a similar many-flowered inflorescence
of white flowers with greenish brown markings and one
or two lorate, unmarked leaves tinged with purple or
maroon. L. peersii differs, however, in being a larger
plant with much larger, urceolate flowers without pale
blue bases and with distinctly recurved inner tepals,
included, spreading stamens and an unspotted peduncle.
The two species have similar globose seeds with a termi-
nal, inflated arillode.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
137
FIGURE 8. — Holotype of Lacheruilia lactosa, Barker 105 10.
Distribution and habitat
Material of L. lactosa was first collected by Miss W.F.
Barker in October 1933 near Kleinmond, where most of
the records of this species have been made, and it has
since been collected on the Houw Hoek Pass, as well as
at Bot River and beyond Baardscheerdersbos, which is
the most easterly record (Figure 9). It is a fairly rare
species with a restricted distribution, occurring in
Lowland Fynbos on flats and gentle slopes in full sun.
Plants occur singly, and unless in flower are extremely
difficult to detect in their natural habitat, due to their rel-
atively small size compared to the surrounding fynbos
vegetation. As with the related L. peersii, which occurs
in the same area, veld fires would most probably benefit
the flowering performance of L. lactosa , resulting in
more robust specimens more easily noticeable in their
habitat. Unfortunately, the populations of this species in
the Kleinmond area are now under real threat due to
housing development.
Material examined
WESTERN CAPE — 3419 (Caledon): Houw Hoek Pass, (-AA),
Sept. 1946, Lewis 2434 (SAM); Honingklip Farm, near Bot River,
(-AC), Sept. 1966, Barker 10476 (NBG); 29-9-1967, Barker 10510
(NBG); near Kleinmond, (-AC), Oct. 1933, Barker 163 (BOL);
Kleinmond, along rocky coast, (-AC), Oct. 1946, De Vos 238, (NBG);
Kleinmond, W of Malherbe Street, between Piet Le Roux and Bob
Laubscher Streets, (-AC), Oct. 1996, Mostert 194 (NBG); Shaw’s
Pass, (-AD), Oct. 1955, Van Niekerk672 (BOL); beyond Baardscheer-
dersbos, on Elim Road, (-DA), Oct. 1966, Chater s.n. sub NBG93633
(NBG).
Lachenalia leipoldtii G.D. Duncan, sp. nov. L.
physocaulotis W.F.Barker affinis propter inflorescentiam
similarem dense subspicatam floribus oblongo-campan-
ulatis staminibus valde exsertis declinatis pedunculo
dense maculato saepe tumido, sed floribus viridi-flavis et
albis folioque lanceolato canaliculate margine undulato
coriaceo basin conspicue dilatatanti, basi folii arete am-
plectenti differt.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3219 (Wuppertal): 4.8 km N
of Citrusdal, (-CA), 11-9-1933, T.M. Salter 3608 (BOL,
holo.!, BM; K).
Deciduous, winter- growing geophyte 100-280 mm
high. Bulb subglobose, 10-15 mm diam., white with dark
brown outer tunics. Leaf solitary, lanceolate, canalicu-
late, pale green or yellowish green, suberect or slightly
arcuate, 30-95 x 3-12 mm, upper surface unmarked or
with few purplish magenta spots or blotches, lower sur-
face marked with purplish magenta spots or blotches in
lower third, margin coriaceous and undulate; clasping
base tight, white in lower half with magenta spots or
blotches, yellowish green in upper half with purplish
magenta spots or blotches. Inflorescence subspicate,
many-flowered, erect or suberect, dense, 35-130 mm
long, with a short or long sterile apex up to 20 mm long;
peduncle slender or sturdy, erect or suberect, yellowish
green, lightly to densely marked with purplish magenta
spots or blotches, slightly to conspicuously swollen in
upper half, 45-60 mm long; rachis pale brownish mauve,
slightly swollen in lower third; pedicels white or pale
green, very short, 1-2 mm long; bracts ovate in lower
third, becoming lanceolate above, white, 2-3 x 1-2 mm.
Flowers oblong-campanulate, suberect, patent or slight-
ly cernuous, pale creamy white or pale greenish yellow
and white, sometimes fading to purplish maroon on
herbarium sheets, with greenish brown or pinkish brown
markings; perianth tube pale blue, 1-2 mm long; outer
tepals ovate, pale greenish yellow, 4-5 x 2-3 mm, with
greenish brown or pinkish brown gibbosities; inner
tepals obovate, 6-7 x 2-3 mm, translucent white with
greenish yellow keels and recurved tips. Stamens well
FIGURE 9. — Distribution of Lachenalia lactosa, •; and L. leipoldtii.
138
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 10. — Lachenalia leipoldtii , drawn from Salter 3608, repro-
duced from the original watercolour by Miss W.F. Barker.
exserted, declinate; filaments white, 9-10 mm long.
Ovary ovoid, pale green, 2x3 mm; style white, protrud-
ing beyond stamens, 9-10 mm long. Capsule ovoid,
membranous, 5x4 mm. Seed globose, 1 mm long, matt
black, with terminal inflated arillode 0.8 mm long.
Flowering time: August to September. Figures 10 & 11.
Etymology, named L. leipoldtii after Dr C. Louis
Leipoldt, celebrated South African naturalist, physician
and poet, who collected this species at Piekenierskloof in
1931, and whose fondness for lachenalias from the
Clanwilliam-Citrusdal area is reflected in his famous
Afrikaans poem ‘Oktobermaand’.
Diagnostic characters
L. leipoldtii is characterised by a dense, subspicate
inflorescence of patent or slightly cernuous, oblong-cam-
panulate, pale creamy white or pale greenish yellow and
white flowers with greenish brown or pinkish brown gib-
bosities. The declinate stamens are well exserted, and the
lower surface of the solitary, lanceolate, canaliculate leaf
is marked with purplish magenta spots or blotches. The
tightly clasping leaf base is white in the lower half and
yellowish green in the upper half, with purplish magenta
spots or blotches. The leaf margin is thickened, and
slightly to distinctly undulate. The specimens recorded
from the Olifants River Valley, Piekenierskloof and
Bidouw only have a slightly swollen peduncle and
rachis, whereas those from Ceres, Karoopoort and Little
Karoo have a conspicuously swollen peduncle and
rachis.
L. leipoldtii is closely related to L. physocaulos
W.F.Barker which has a similar dense subspicate inflor-
escence, oblong-campanulate flowers, well-exserted,
declinate stamens and usually a distinctly swollen
peduncle and rachis. It differs from L. leipoldtii in hav-
ing a subterranean, very loosely clasping leaf base, a lin-
ear, conduplicate, glaucous leaf without markings or
thickened margin, and pale magenta inner tepals and fil-
aments. The two species have similar very small, globose
seeds with a short, terminal inflated arillode.
Distribution and habitat
Material of L. leipoldtii was collected for the first time
by C.L. Zeyher in 1931 on the farm Brakfontein in the
Olifants River Valley (Gunn & Codd 1981) and it has sub-
sequently been recorded from Piekenierskloof and
Bidouw Valley, and to the southeast near Ceres and
I*
FIGURE 1 1 . — Holotype of Lachenalia leipoldtii, Salter 3608.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
139
Karoopoort, and further north between Touwsrivier and
Montagu (Figure 9). Plants occur in colonies in sandy soil
in full sun.
Material examined
WESTERN CAPE. — 3218 (Clanwilliam): Farm Brakfontein,
Olifants River Valley, (-DB), Ecklon & Zeyher 45 (SAM); Pieke-
nierskloof, (-DB), Aug. 1931, Leipoldt s.n. sub BOL20456 (BOL).
3219 (Wuppertal): Bidouw, (-AB), Aug. 1945, Bolus s.n. sub
BOL23641 (BOL); 4.8 km N of Citrusdal, (-CA), 11-9-1933, Salter
3608 (BM, BOL, K). 3319 (Worcester): 38.6 km on Ceres-Calvinia-
Sutherland road, (-BA), Sept. 1971, Thomas s.n. (NBG); Karoo Poort,
(-BC), Sept. 1941, Barker 1110 (NBG); Hottentots Kloof, Ceres Dist.,
(-BC), Sept. 1944, Barker 3064 (NBG). 3320 (Montagu): Tweedside,
Laingsburg Dist.. (-AB), Sept. 1932, Barker 162 (BOL); Touwsrivier,
(-AC), Sept. 1974, Obermeyer s.n. sub NBG108599 (NBG). Without
precise locality: between Montagu and Touwsrivier, Sept. 1933, Lewis
& Leighton s.n. (BOL).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am very grateful to the staff of the Compton
Herbarium, particularly Dr J.C. Manning, Dr D.A. Pater-
son Jones and Mrs S.E. Foster for their assistance at var-
ious stages of this study. I am also much indebted to Dr
O.A. Leistner for compiling the Latin translations of the
diagnoses, Mrs J. Loedolff for taking the black and white
photographs of the herbarium sheets and Mrs B.A.
Momberg for technical assistance, as well as Ms K. Behr,
Mr L. Mostert, Dr J.P. Rourke and Mr and Mrs R.
Saunders for assistance in the field.
REFERENCES
BARKER, W.F. 1978. Ten new species of Lttchenalia (Liliaceae).
Journal of South African Botany 44: 91^-18.
BARKER, W.F. 1979. Ten more new species of Lachenalia (Liliaceae).
Journal of South African Botany 45: 193-219.
BARKER, W.F. 1983a. A list of the Lachenalia species included in
Rudolf Schlechter's collections made on his collecting trips in
southern Africa, with identifications added Journal of South
African Botany 49: 45-55.
BARKER, W.F. 1983b. Six more new species of Lachenalia
(Liliaceae). Journal of South African Botany 49: 423-444.
BARKER, W.F. 1984. Three more new species of Lachenalia and one
new variety of an early species (Liliaceae). Journal of South
African Botany 50: 535-547.
BARKER, W.F. 1987. Five more new species of Lachenalia (Liliaceae -
Hyacinthoideae), four from the Cape Province and one from
southern South West Africa\Namibia. South African Journal of
Botany 53: 166-172.
BARKER, W.F. 1989. New taxa and nomenclatural changes in
Lachenalia (Liliaceae) from the Cape Province. South African
Journal of Botany 55: 630-646.
DUNCAN, G.D 1987. Lachenalia macgregoriorum. The Flowering
Plants of Africa 49: t. 1951.
DUNCAN, G.D 1988a. The Lachenalia handbook. Annals of
Kirstenbosch Botanic Gardens 17. National Botanical Institute,
Cape Town.
DUNCAN, G.D 1988b. Lachenalia arbuthnotiae. The Flowering
Plants of Africa 50: t. 1961.
DUNCAN, G.D. 1989a. Lachenalia. In B Jeppe, Spring and winter
flowering bulbs of the Cape. Oxford University Press, Cape
Town.
DUNCAN, G.D. 1989b. Lachenalia. In N. Du Plessis & G. Duncan,
Bulbous plants of southern Africa. Tafelberg, Cape Town.
DUNCAN, G.D. 1992. Lachenalia: its distribution, conservation status
and taxonomy. Acta Horticulturae 325: 843-845.
DUNCAN, G.D 1993 Lachenalia thomasiae. The Flowering Plants of
Africa 52: t 2061.
DUNCAN, G.D. 1994. The genus Lachenalia, and the discovery of a
beautiful new species from the Western Cape Province of South
Africa. Shin-Kaki 163: 32-35.
DUNCAN, G.D. 1996. Four new species and one new subspecies of
Lachenalia (Hyacinthaceae) from arid areas of South Africa.
Bothalia 26: 1-9.
DUNCAN, G.D. 1997a. Five new species of Lachenalia (Hya-
cinthaceae) from and areas of South Africa. Bothalia 27: 7-15.
DUNCAN, G.D. 1997b. Lachenalia rosea. Flowering Plants of Africa
55: t. 2126.
GUNN, M. & CODD, L.E. 1981. Botanical exploration of southern
Africa Balkema, Cape Town.
Bothalia 28,2: 141-149 (1998)
A revision of Lachenalia (Hyacinthaceae) in the Eastern Cape, South
Africa
A.P. DOLD* and P.B. PHILLIPSON*
Keywords: Eastern Cape, Hyacinthaceae, Lachenalia Jacq.f. ex Murray, South Africa, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
A taxonomic account of the genus Lachenalia Jacq.f. ex Murray in the Eastern Cape, South Africa, is given. Eight
species are recognised, and descriptions of these are amended and elaborated as necessary, three taxa have been reduced to
synonymy and five species erroneously recorded within the province are excluded. Three of the species are endemic to the
province. An identification key is provided.
INTRODUCTION
The genus Lachenalia is confined to southern Africa
and consists of a little over 100 species (Arnold & De
Wet 1993). The majority of these species occur in the
winter rainfall region of the Western Cape in the sclero-
phyllous shrublands or ‘fynbos’ of the Cape floristic
region (sensu White 1983). The geographic range of a
few species extends from this region into the western
parts of the Eastern Cape and one even occurs as far
northeast as the Free State. The few remaining species
are endemic to the Eastern Cape. The genus has attracted
attention as an horticultural subject, and some of the
more decorative species have become well known
through cultivation. Despite this, no revision of the genus
has been attempted since Baker’s (1897) treatment in
Flora capensis; however the work of Barker (see Arnold
& De Wet 1993 for references) and Duncan (1988, 1996,
1997), has resulted in the species from Western Cape
becoming reasonably well known taxonomically. The
same cannot be said for the Eastern Cape species. They
have mostly been unknown in cultivation, and they are
generally represented only by few, rather old herbarium
specimens.
In the course of field work in the Eastern Cape it
became clear that Baker’s treatment was far from ade-
quate. Observations of populations of certain species
indicated that they are very variable, and that many of
Baker’s diagnostic characters are unreliable. It was clear
that a knowledge of the plants in the field would be
essential in producing an effective treatment for the
genus in the province, and that a wider range of charac-
ters should be considered.
Key to the species of Lachenalia in the Eastern Cape
la Perianth more than 15 mm long, always yellow-green; flower erecto-patent (45° or less to inflorescence axis) at
and after anthesis; confined in Eastern Cape to coastal grassland 1. L. algoensis
lb Perianth less than 15 mm long, usually white to deep pink or purple, sometimes dull green with brown markings
or rarely yellow-green (see L. bowkeri): flower cemuous to patent at anthesis, sometimes erecto-patent after
anthesis; not confined to coastal grassland:
2a Inner perianth segments always recurved at tips, usually exceeding outer by at least 1.4 mm:
3a Leaf irregularly marked with brown, green or maroon blotches on upper surface, margin coriaceous; stamens
pale to dark maroon, well exserted 8. L. karooica
3b Leaf not marked on upper surface, margin not coriaceous; stamens white, included or exserted:
4a Stamens nearly twice as long as inner perianth segments, exserted by 3-13 mm, spreading; perianth cam-
panulate, inner lobes exceeding outer lobes by up to 2 mm 5. L. latimerae
4b Stamens included or exserted up to 3 mm, declinate; perianth oblong-campanulate, inner lobes exceeding
outer by 2 mm or more:
5a Stamens not or very slightly exserted; outer perianth lobes recurved, lower inner lobe broadly flared; leaf
banded dark green below, confined to an area extending from Eastern Cape to Karoo 7. L. perryae
5b Stamens exserted by ± 2 mm or more; outer perianth lobes not recurved, lower inner lobe not broadly
flared; leaf not banded below; extending from coastal areas to Karoo 2. L. bowkeri
2b Inner perianth segments straight or slightly spreading but not recurved at tips, ± equal in length to outer seg-
ments:
6a Stamens included; perianth broadly cup-shaped, as long as broad, ± 5 mm long, segment apices not spread-
ing; flower cemuous at anthesis; inflorescence lax, 3-5 mm, between adjacent pedicels .... 4. L. convallarioides
6b Stamens shortly exserted (up to 2 mm); perianth campanulate, longer than broad, ± 5.5 mm long or more,
segment apices spreading; flower patent at anthesis; inflorescence very dense with less than 2 mm
between adjacent pedicels:
7a Perianth up to 5.6 mm long, campanulate; endemic to high mountains of Eastern Cape ... 3. L. campanulata
7b Perianth at least 8 mm long, oblong-campanulate; confined in Eastern Cape to coastal areas in extreme
west 6. L. youngii
* Selmar Schonland Herbarium, Department of Botany, Rhodes University, P.O. Box 94, 6 1 40 Grahamstown, South Africa. BOTD@RHOBOTRU.AC.ZA
MS. received: 1997-12-10.
142
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
In addition to more conventional macro-morphologi-
cal characters, Barker (1978) found seed morphology to
be particularly useful in delimiting the different taxa
in the Western Cape. Ornduff & Watters (1978) and
Johnson & Brandham (1997) have provided chromosome
counts for several species. The value of these characters
in understanding the Eastern Cape species has not previ-
ously been assessed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The present account is based on a study of herbarium
specimens from relevant herbaria (see acknowledge-
ments), and of living plants in the field and in cultivation.
A total of 16 populations representing five of the Eastern
Cape species were located and detailed descriptive notes
of living plants were made. Particular attention was paid
to differential characters used by previous researchers
and to characters that appeared to be variable within each
population. Representative specimens were collected for
cultivation and as herbarium specimens. Seeds of all
species were examined with a JEOL-JSM 840 scanning
electron microscope.
1. Lachenalia algoensis Schonland in Transac-
tions of the Royal Society of South Africa 1: 443 (1910);
Fourc.: 101 (1941); A. Batten & Bokelmann: 16 (1966);
E.Gledhill: 70 (1981); A.Moriarty: 34 (1982); Bond &
Goldblatt: 51 (1984); G.D. Duncan: 35 (1988). Type:
Eastern Cape, Port Elizabeth, 13 August 1903, Drege 64
(GRA, syn. ! ); Redhouse, Paterson 92 (syn. non vide).
Lachenalia algoensis was described in detail by
Schonland in 1910. No elaboration of Schonland's mor-
F1GURE 1 . — Seeds of Lachenalia. A, L. algoensis, Tail 155', B, L. bowkeri, Dold 280', C, L. campanulata, Dold 1233', D, L. convallarioides, Dold
1018, E, L latimerae, Dold 1802', F, L. youngii. Hops 33. Scale bars: 100 pm.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
143
FIGURE 2. — Inflorescences of Lachenalia. A, L. algoensis, plant from Linton Grange, Port Elizabeth (no voucher). B-D, L. bowkeri : B, Dold
2267\ C, Dold 2269\ D, Dold 1766. E, L. campanulata, Dold 1233\ F, L. convallarioides, Dold 1018. Scale bars: 10 mm.
phological description is necessary, except to note that
the seeds are ± 2.2 x 1.1 mm, black and shiny, with a
smooth testa and a blunt decurrent arillode, ± 1.0 mm
long (Figure 1A). It is relatively well known and is clear-
ly distinct from all other species that occur in the Eastern
Cape, being by far the largest flowered species in the area
(Figure 2A).
Distribution and habitat
In the Eastern Cape it ranges from the Knysna District
in the west to the Bushman’s River in the east, always
near the coast (Figure 3). According to Duncan (1988), it
extends to Worcester in the Western Cape.
Vouchers: Burrows 3355 (GRA); Cruder. 388 (PRE); Dold 691 (GRA);
Schonland s.n. (GRA); Tait 3761 (PEU).
2. Lachenalia bowkeri Baker in Flora capensis 6:
427 (1897); Bond & Goldblatt: 52 (1984); G.D.Duncan:
32 (1988); Urton & D.Page: 124 (1993). Type; Somerset
Division, Bowker s.n. (K, holo.!).
L. subspicata Fourc.: 79 (1934); Fourc.: 101 (1941). Type: Humans-
dorp Division, Flats Zuur Anys, on road to Kouga, Fourcade 3044
(BOL, holo.!).
Plant (50—) 1 1 0(— 2 1 0) mm tall. Bulb globose, 8-17
mm diam., inner flesh translucent, white, outer tunics
dry, coarsely papery, dark brown, often flaking, inner
tunic minutely white-spotted, sometimes forming a short,
coarse, brush-like neck of 5-10 mm, just visible at ground
level; leaf sheath membranous, translucent, extending
above neck by 5-15 mm, loosely clasping. Leaves
1— 2( — 4), (45— )60— 1 20(— 300) x (5-)8-10(— 30) mm, but
frequently eaten by herbivores and thus appearing un-
naturally short, deeply channelled, erect, slightly fleshy,
144
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 3. — Distribution of Lachenalia algoensis , •; L. lairooica, A;
and L. perryae, H
smooth, pale green, sometimes with faint purple margin,
sometimes with bluish blush; base often clasping pedun-
cle up to 20-40 mm, extreme base white, occasionally
very faintly purple-spotted just above ground; apex
bluntly acute, often dry; keel indistinct. Inflorescence
erect, (40— )60— 80(— 1 40) mm tall, spicate to subspicate;
peduncle and inflorescence axis usually slender, up to
2-3 mm thick, thickest just below first flower, pale
green, very pale at base, sometimes spotted dull purple;
fertile part ( 1 0— )30— 50(— 70) x 15-25 mm, with 4-25
(often about 10) flowers; sterile tip tufted, 2-6 mm long;
bracts cupped, deltoid, with slightly winged margins,
white to greenish white, 1.1-1. 8 x 1.1-1. 8 mm, with
basal spur up to 0.7 mm long, apex acute, 0.7-0. 9 mm
long, facing downwards or curling under. Flowers some-
times (but not always) sweetly scented; pedicels held at
40° to stem, 0. 5-2.0 x 0.3-0. 4 mm, white to pale green;
perianth patent or more usually somewhat cernuous,
oblong campanulate, (6.5— )9.0(— 1 1.0) mm long, (3.0-)
3.6(-4.0) mm diam. at base, slightly swollen at base,
varying from white to pale green or very pale purple to
purple with green or purple distal keels, becoming dark-
er with age; inner lobes obovate, 6-10 x 3. 0-4. 5 mm,
spreading outwards, all 3 inner lobes of equal length,
exceeding outer by (1 .5— )2.0(— 3.0) mm; apex obtuse,
recurved; base cuneate, sometimes speckled with blue;
outer lobes ovate, 4. 6-6.0 x 2. 1-3.1 mm, not spreading
outwards; apex obtuse; base truncate with very slight
gibbosities which are most pronounced on upper lobe,
unevenly speckled or blotched with pale purple or pale
blue. Stamens declinate; filaments white, 7-9 mm long;
anthers 0.8-1. 4 x 0.5-0. 8 mm, maturing in stages, low-
est pair first and upper pair last, included within perianth
before maturity and purple, then exserted by ( 1 — )2(— 3)
mm and yellow when mature and finally becoming
black, and eventually, as fruit develops, being drawn
back into perianth. Ovary green, 1.7-3. 2 x 1. 5-2.0 mm;
style exserted, 6. 3-9.0 mm long, white. Capsule ovoid,
2. 4-4.0 x 1. 5-4.0 mm, papery, brown. Seed 1 .4-2.2 x
1.1-1. 5 mm; testa reticulate or smooth, black, shiny;
arillode bluntly pointed, 0.45-0.5 mm sometimes short-
ly decurrent. Chromosome number. 2n = 16 ( Dold 280,
Kew reference 95-30, Kew accession 1995-26, Johnson
& Brandham 1997). Figures IB; 2B-D.
Duncan (1988) described L. bowkeri as a poorly
known species. We interpret it as an extremely variable
species, which is actually well represented in herbaria
compared to most of the other Eastern Cape species. The
variation in L. bowkeri is so great that during the course
of the present study we were convinced for a long time
that it represented at least three distinct species. Variation
occurs in several characters, notably: overall size, num-
ber of leaves, flower orientation, pedicel length, perianth
colour and degree of exsertion of the stamens. Variation
in these characters can be seen among individual plants
in a population, and is certainly attributable in part to
phenotypic responses to minor variations in microhabitat.
Considerable phenotypic plasticity has also been noted in
plants brought into cultivation. However, different popu-
lations of L. bowkeri do show certain relatively constant
and distinct features and these appear to some extent to
be related to geographical distribution. It may eventually
be possible to describe infraspecific taxa within L. bowk-
eri and thus delimit these variations formally, but at pre-
sent we understand too little of the nature of the species’
variability to enable us to do so confidently. Further cyto-
logical studies of the different populations will be done at
Kew and may help to clarify this variation.
Interpretation of herbarium material is complicated by
the tendency in old flowers for the stamens to be drawn
into the perianth and for the inner perianth lobes to
become constricted at the mouth (Figure 2C). In this con-
dition the flowers closely resemble those of certain other
species and present a very different facies to that of care-
fully pressed specimens with freshly opened flowers. At
anthesis, stamen exsertion varies from 1 to 3 mm, but the
type specimen is a plant with old flowers and thus in
Baker’s (1897) original description, L. bowkeri is stated
to have included stamens.
Baker also states that the leaf is solitary. However,
occasional 2-leaved plants were found in the populations
we studied. Very rarely, exceptionally vigorous bulbs
were found that had three or even four leaves and two
inflorescences. Plants of L. bowkeri have regularly been
misidentified in herbaria (often as L. orchioides (L.)
Aiton), since they are frequently at variance with Baker’s
description with respect to the exsertion of the stamens
and the number of leaves.
Plant height, leaf dimensions and the number of flow-
ers per inflorescence vary considerably within popula-
tions and from one population to another depending on
exposure. Plants found in open karroid grassland are
smaller than those shaded by grass clumps in open
coastal grassland. Plants found in salt pans are more
robust but not necessarily taller. In several localities
robust plants with particularly thick peduncles have been
collected. The bulb tunic appears to be influenced by the
type of substrate and plants growing in hard, dry, rocky
ground will always have thick, dry flaking scales with a
short brush-like neck, whereas in loam or sandy soil the
tunics will be less scaly and most often without a neck at
all. The base of the leaf often tightly clasps the peduncle
for up to a third of its length and then opens abruptly.
This is seen predominantly in karroid areas, whereas
under favourable conditions leaves are broader and sel-
dom clasping, sometimes in pairs, one always much
smaller than the other. From observations in the field and
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
145
from herbarium specimen labels it is also clear that L.
bowkeri is variable in coloration. The perianth of plants
from the dry Subtropical Thicket of the Fish River valley
vary from white, tinged with green, with pale mauve dis-
tal keels, to entirely purple. Those from Naude’s Hoek in
the Keiskamma River valley are pale green to dull yel-
low-green with dull purple markings, while further west
at Ghio Marsh Nature Reserve, the perianth is white with
green speckling on distal keels and blue speckling on the
base of the outer lobes, and older flowers already closed
become tinged with dull purple. Within populations the
flower colour seems to be more or less uniform,
although, as in other species in the Eastern Cape, the
individual flowers become darker in colour with age,
tending to fade to dull purple as the fruit develops.
Flower size, orientation and the extent to which the peri-
anth lobes are recurved or spread, particularly at the tips,
is somewhat variable (Figure 2B-D), but tends to be rel-
atively constant within populations. Pedicel length shows
little variation, from sessile to only 2 mm long.
Seed morphology is variable from one population to
another. Seeds from herbarium sheets and live plants
have been examined. Figure IB is representative of
plants from the Fish and Keiskamma River valleys. Seed
from collections further west are of similar size, but tend
to have a rather variable arillode, which is often more
blunt and less strongly decurrent.
Lachenalia subspicata was described in 1934 by
Fourcade, who compared his new species only with L.
orchioides and L. youngii Baker. It appears that he over-
looked the similarity between his plant and L. bowkeri ,
possibly because Baker (1897) incorrectly described the
latter as having 'quite sessile flowers’. On examination
of the type, a few very short pedicels can be seen on one
inflorescence. Following ‘Pretoria National Herbarium
practice’, Arnold & De Wet (1993) have placed L. sub-
spicata into synonymy with L. bowkeri. On examination
of the type collections and consideration of the variabili-
ty of the species we concur with this practice.
Distribution and habitat
Lachenalia bowkeri is virtually confined to the
Eastern Cape, with only two known collections from the
Western Cape. The type locality is ‘Somerset’ (presum-
ably Somerset East), but this is the only collection known
from there, the majority of collections are from the
Albany District, with others from the Alexandria and Port
Elizabeth Districts (Figure 4). All collections are from
below 850 m and by far the majority of these are found
at altitudes below 600 m. It usually occurs in open grass-
land and often on margins of salt pans usually partially
shaded under grass clumps, or, less commonly, in drier,
rocky areas of Subtropical Thicket on south-facing
slopes. Populations are small and localised and plants
occur singly or in small groups of two or three in areas
not exceeding 10 m* 2.
Vouchers: Dold 2267 , 2268. 2418 (GRA); 2269, 2419 (GRA, PRE).
3. Lachenalia campanulata Baker in Journal of
Botany 12: 6 (1874); Baker: 432 (1897); Bond & Gold-
blatt: 52 (1984). Type: Somerset East, In lapidosis sum-
mii Montis Boschberg, 4800ft, (-DA), MacOwan 1836
(K, holo.!; GRA, iso.!).
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
FIGURE 4. — Distribution of Lachenalia bowkeri , ▲; and L. latimer-
ae, •.
L. rhodantha Baker: 430 ( 1 897). Type: Graaff Reinet, Sides of grassy
mountains, Oudeberg, Graaff Reinet, 4300ft, (-DD), Bolus 719 (K.
holo.!).
Plant (50—) 1 1 0(— 230) mm high depending on amount
of shade. Bulb globose, 5-15 mm diam., white, fleshy,
outer tunics dry, membranous, pale brownish, peeling in
places, not neck-forming. Leaves 2, rarely 1, linear, erect,
( 1 5.0— )8.6(— 30.0) x 1-7 mm, not sheathing, smooth,
entire, drying at tips, base white with purple spots, blade
light green and unmarked to densely covered with minute
red spots, subterete, keel indistinct. Inflorescence subspi-
cate to racemose, 10-20 x 2— 3( — 5) mm, flowers dense,
number of flowers (4—) 1 6(— 34); peduncle erect with
slight curve, white at base to green often densely to
entirely covered with minute red spots, thickest at base,
2. 0-3. 5 mm, becoming thinner closer to inflorescence;
sterile tip 2-3 mm, not tufted; pedicels spreading, rarely
sessile, 2.5(— 3.0) mm, white to pale red; bracts 2 mm
wide, with acute spreading apex, cup-shaped, 1.5 mm
deep, slightly spurred at base, white tinged green and
minutely red-spotted; lower bracts ± 2 mm long; upper
bracts ± 1 mm long. Flowers unscented, perianth spread-
ing to horizontal, not becoming cernuous in lower half of
inflorescence, campanulate, base rounded, slightly
swollen, 5.6 mm long, 3.3 mm at broadest point, inner
segments oblong, 5.5 x 1.3 mm, outer segments oval
elliptic, 5.5 mm long, 2.6 mm wide at base, inner seg-
ments not exceeding outer, segments spreading in distal
end, ranging from pure white to red at anthesis, darken-
ing soon afterwards to purple; gibbosities indistinct,
tinged faintly greenish. Stamens shortly exserted by up to
2 mm, becoming included soon after anthesis, yellow;
filaments white. Ovary ovoid, green, 2.1 x 1.4 mm; style
2.7 mm, finally exserted, persistant. Capsule ovoid, 3.8 x
2.4 mm, papery, brown. Seed black, shiny, ovoid, ± 1.7 x
1.2 mm, testa reticulate, arillode short, tapering, assym-
metrical, decurrent, 0.2 mm long. Figures 1C; 2E.
Lachenalia campanulata can be distinguished by the
combination of its spreading to horizontal (lowers about
5.6 mm long with exserted stamens and subequal peri-
anth lobes, and its (usually) paired leaves. In the Eastern
Cape it most closely resembles L. convallarioides Baker
which has flowers of similar size and also has subequal
146
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
perianth lobes. The two species differ in several charac-
ters. L. campanulata has a relatively dense inflorescence
and the thickest point of its peduncle is at the base; in L.
convallcirioides the inflorescence is rather lax and the
thickest point of its peduncle is immediately below the
first flower. In L. campanulata the perianth is campanu-
late and the lobes are reflexed, whereas in L. convallari-
oides it is cup-shaped and the lobes are not reflexed. In L.
campanulata seeds are ± 1.7 mm long and have a short,
tapering, assymmetrical, decurrent arillode, and a reticu-
late testa; those of L. convallarioides are ± 2 mm long,
and have a rounded, symmetrical, terminal, arillode, and
a smooth testa.
Plants of L. campanulata are variable in size depend-
ing on the degree of exposure and individuals 230 mm
tall can be found in sheltered positions in close proximi-
ty to others only 60 mm tall in exposed positions. Colour
is also very variable from pure white to pink to deep red
at anthesis, darkening to purple.
Baker’s description of L. rhodantha is based only on
the type collection. Bolus 719. It was said to be distin-
guished from L. campanulata by having a single leaf
rather than two, lower Bowers cernuous rather than hori-
zontal, stamens exserted, not included, and being bright
red rather than white tinged with red. Not having seen
these plants in their natural habitat Baker could not have
known of the variability of these supposedly diagnostic
characters, and plants closely matching the type speci-
mens of both species can be found growing together. In
all three populations we have studied in the field, most of
the plants were 2-leaved, whereas occasional 1 -leaved
and even 3-leaved plants were found in each. All of the
specimens we have examined (living and preserved),
including the type of L. rhodantha, have spreading to
horizontal flowers in the lower part of the inflorescence.
Baker’s description of the orientation of the lower flow-
ers of L. rhodantha is an error, as they are clearly hori-
zontal. The type collection of L. campanulata, MacOwan
1836, consists of plants past anthesis which have their
stamens included and style excluded, dark perianths and
ovaries obviously swollen. In the field we have recorded
that young plants consistently have spreading flowers
with a slightly swollen base, an open mouth and exserted
stamens. After anthesis the flower becomes horizontal
and darker in colour, the perianth lobes close at the
mouth and the stamens become drawn into the perianth
and the base of the flower swells with the ovary.
Distribution and habitat
Lachenalia campanulata is confined to the mountains
of the interior of the Eastern Cape between 24° and 29°
E and 30° to 33° S, and has been recorded at altitudes
from 1 200 to 2 400 m on steep, open slopes (Figure 5).
Vouchers: Cotterrell 52 (GRA); Dold 1233. 1993 (GRA, PRE);
Hilliard & Burn 14718 (NU, PRE); Van Der Wall 256 (PRE).
4. Lachenalia convallarioides Baker in Journal of
the Linnean Society 1 I; 407 (1871); Martin & Noel: 26
(1960); Dold: 29 (1994). Type: Eastern Cape, Kreli’s
Country, Caffraria, Bowker 444 (K, holo.!; TCD, iso.!).
L. convallarioides Baker var. robusta Baker: 407 (1871). Type:
Albany, Williamson s.n. (TCD, holo.!).
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
FIGURE 5. — Distribution of Lachenalia campanulata, •; L. conval-
larioides, A; and L. youngii, ■
Plant (80-)135(-250) mm high, depending on amount
of shade. Bulb globose 10-15 mm diam., white fleshy,
outer tunics dry, membranous, pale brownish, peeling in
places, not neck-forming. Leaves 1 (—2), 80-280 mm
long, as long as inflorescence or occasionally up to one
third of its length longer than inflorescence, especially in
more robust specimens; sheathing up to 20 mm, 8-20
mm wide at broadest point, linear to lorate, margin entire,
apex acute, erect with a shallow 40° curve away from
peduncle, fleshy, often with a slight twist in axis, persis-
tent apex dry and shrivelled, deeply U-shaped in cross
section; keel indistinct, smooth, glabrous, pale green,
extreme base white or densely, minutely spotted purple
red (BCC 822). Inflorescence racemose, flowers sparse
(5—) 1 9(— 60), (20— )40(— 1 10) mm long; peduncle erect,
slender, (50-)95(-140) mm, shallowly curved, thickest
point 1-2 mm, immediately below first flower, pale
green to pale pink near apex; sterile tip 2 mm, not tufted;
pedicels erect-patent, spreading, 2. 5-5.0 mm, white to
pinkish; bracts 2 mm across, deeply cupped, 1 mm long,
with acute patent apex, 0.9 mm, and basal spur. Flowers
unscented; perianth horizontally spreading to cernuous at
anthesis and then horizontal in older flowers, campanu-
late, rounded at base, 5 mm long, 4 mm diam. at base,
inner segments obovoid, 5 mm long, 3.5 mm at broadest
point, shorter than the outer, outer segments white, 2.5
mm long; anthers white at anthesis, black after anthesis.
Ovary ovoid, green, 3-locular, 3.0 x 2.5 mm; style 2.5
mm long. Capsule ovoid, 4x3 mm, tissue-like, finely
net-veined, golden yellow. Seed black, shiny, smooth,
ovoid, 2.0 x 1.2 mm; terminal arillode symmetrical,
blunt, 0.56 mm. Chromosome number : 2n = 30 ( Dold
1018, Kew reference 95-31, Kew accession 1995-27).
Figures ID; 2F.
Lachenalia convallarioides is recognised by its rather
lax inflorescence of nodding flowers with included sta-
mens and subequal perianth lobes, and its (usually) sin-
gle leaf. Other characters that serve to distinguish it from
L. campanulata, the Eastern Cape species it most closely
resembles, are given under that species.
L. convallarioides is very variable in leaf and inflor-
escence size depending on the plant’s degree of exposure
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
147
to the sun. The most exposed plants are the most con-
spicuous in natural populations but as a result of their
exposure are also the smallest, and these match the type
collection. Plants growing in shaded places, partly hid-
den by other vegetation are rather inconspicuous, and can
be much larger. Baker, not having seen this variation
within populations, assigned varietal status to William-
son’s collection (71 Williamson s.n.) which clearly match-
es shade-growing plants in populations we have seen.
The chromosome number of 2n = 30 is unusual in the
genus Lachenalia, where the common basic number is x
= 7 or 8, although x = 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 15 have also
been found. Johnson & Brandham (pers. comm.), have
suggested that the 2n = 30 (x = 15) could be an allote-
traploid derived from taxa with x = 7 and x = 8 following
hybridisation and chromosome doubling.
Distribution and habitat
Lachenalia convallarioides is only known from the
Albany District near Grahamstown in the Eastern Cape,
where it grows on rocky outcrops of Witteberg Quartzite,
and from the Mount Arthur Range about 180 km to the
northeast, at altitudes of around 17 to 1 800 m (Figure 5).
Populations are very localised resulting in their being
easily overlooked even in well-explored localities such
as on Mountain Drive, Grahamstown. This locality is
within walking distance from the Botany Department at
Rhodes University but, remarkably, only three collec-
tions have ever been made from this generally well-col-
lected area.
Bowker’s type collection from Kreli’s Country,
Caffraria, and Barber’s Zuurberg collection, both num-
bered 444, are almost certainly the same collection from
what was known in 1856 as the Zuurberg in the extreme
northwest of Chief Kreli’s territory in Caffraria (Hall
1856). These mountains are now known as the Mount
Arthur Range. Bowker, a soldier, was stationed in this
area and collected plant specimens for his sister, Mrs
M.E. Barber (nee Bowker), (Thorpe 1977; Gunn & Codd
1981), who sent them to Harvey at TCD. Baker saw this
material much later (Dr John Parnell, Trinity College,
Dublin, pers. comm.). The Bowker/Barber collection is
the only known collection from outside the Albany
District.
Vouchers: Barber 444 (TCD); Borman s.n. sub RUH10632 (GRA);
Dold 1018 (GRA. K); Pym s.n. (GRA); Williamson s.n. (TCD).
5. Lachenalia latimerae W.F. Barker in Journal of
South African Botany 45:196 (1979); Bond & Goldblatt:
52 (1984); G.D. Duncan: 60 (1988). Type: Ferndale Farm,
Patensie, (-DD), July 1949, Courtenay-Latimer s.n. sub
NBG72287 (NBG, holo.!).
Lachenalia latimerae was described by Ms W.F.
Barker in 1979 from the type and from cultivated mater-
ial collected near Patensie ( Bayliss 7102). Recently we
have located two new populations of this species.
Barker’s description needs no further elaboration. In
common with most of the other species in the Eastern
Cape it should be noted that overall size varies consider-
ably. Seed morphology of our collections conforms to
that of the type collection. Figures IE; 6.
FIGURE 6. — Inflorescence of Lachenalia latimerae. Dold 1802. Scale
bar: 10 mm.
Distribution and habitat
L. latimerae is found in the Kouga Mountains near
Patensie in the Eastern Cape and it has also been collect-
ed at the Cango Caves near Oudsthoorn in the Western
Cape. It has been found at altitudes from 320 to 1 000 m
(Figure 4). The two populations of L. latimerae that have
been examined in the field were both very localised, with
less than 50 plants occurring in an area of ± 8 m2 in each
case. Both were situated at the base of a very steep south-
facing rocky slope with dense pockets of bush. The
plants occur in open vegetation, often in moss-covered
patches of about 1 m2 in full shade.
Vouchers: Bayliss 7102 (NBG); Clark 1031 (GRA, PRE), DC1014
(GRA, K); Dol'd 1802 (GRA, PRE), 2417 (GRA).
6. Lachenalia youngii Baker in Flora capensis 6:
433 (1897); Fourc.: 101 (1941); Bond & Goldblatt: 54
(1984); G.D. Duncan: 42 (1988). Type: Oudtshoorn,
Montagu Pass, (-CD), 1200 ft, September 1889, Young
5545 (K, holo.! and iso.!; BOL, iso.!).
Lachenalia youngii was described by Baker (1897)
and by Duncan (1988). No further elaboration is neces-
sary.
Baker (1897) only cited a single sheet of Young 5545
under L. youngii. He identified a second sheet labelled
148
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
Young 5545 as L. unicolor. We have examined both sheets,
and conclude that they are without any doubt duplicates
and they conform perfectly to Baker’s description of L.
youngii. Baker’s misidentification of the sheet accounts
for erroneous distribution records for L. unicolor in the
literature. It is uncertain whether seed morphology is
diagnostic or not as only a single specimen has been
examined (Figure IF).
Distribution and habitat
Lachenalia youngii has been recorded from numerous
localities in the mountains of the southeastern part of the
Western Cape, and extends into the Eastern Cape near
Humansdorp (Figure 5), growing in fynbos.
Vouchers: Fourcade 347 (BOL, GRA), 5385 (BOL); Rogers 27962
(GRA); Vlok 1207 ( K); West 231 (GRA).
7. Lachenalia perryae G.D. Duncan in Bothalia
26: 3 (1996). Type: Western Cape, Karoo National
Botanical Garden veld reserve, Worcester, Aug. 1985,
Perry s.n. (NBG, holo.; PRE).
Duncan’s (1996) description needs no elaboration.
Lachenalia perryae may be recognised as follows: it usu-
ally has a single narrowly lanceolate, banded leaf, which
does not widen abruptly at the base; patent or slightly
cernous, oblong-campanulate flowers with pale blue
outer perianth segments and whitish inner segments, and
included stamens.
Distribution and habitat
The species is essentially a Western Cape species with
the majority of collections from the Karoo National
Botanical Garden at Worcester. It has been recorded from
Worcester District south to Port Beaufort and eastwards
to Albertinia (Duncan 1996). One isolated record from
Kommadagga in the Eastern Cape is a wide disjunction
(Figure 3). The occurrence of the plant in the Eastern
Cape needs further study, especially since the species
appears to be quite closely related to L. bowkeri.
Vouchers: Bayliss 5919 (PRE).
8. Lachenalia karooica W.F.Barker ex G.D. Dun-
can in Bothalia 26: 1 (1996). Type: Free State, Faure-
smith, veld, 0.5 km on road from Fauresmith to
Koffiefontein, 6 Aug. 1976, Chaplin s.n. (NBG, holo.).
Duncan’s (1996) description needs no elaboration.
Lachenalia karooica is easily recognised in the Eastern
Cape by its maroon stamens and the coriaceous margins
of its leaves together with its northwestern distribution.
Distribution and habitat
Lachenalia karooica has been recorded from scattered
localities in the Great Karoo in the Western Cape, the
Northern Cape and the Free State, and extends into north-
ern parts of the Eastern Cape just south of the Orange
River (Figure 3). At the type locality plants grow on
south-facing aspects on dolomite outcrops.
Vouchers: Burrows 2157 (PRE); Meyer 206 (PRE).
EXCLUDED SPECIES
Lachenalia aloides (L.f.) Engl.
Baker (1897) cited a specimen from Hill Park, Port
Elizabeth {East South Central African Herbarium 49 K!)
as L. aloides. The specimen was wrongly identified by
Baker — it is L. algoensis. Duncan (1988) regards L.
aloides as restricted to the Western Cape, a view with
which we agree.
Lachenalia orchioides (L.) Aiton
Baker (1897) cited two specimens from what is now
the Eastern Cape, both from Grahamstown: MacOwan
1337 (GRA!) and Galpin 228 (PRE!). On examination of
the specimens it is immediately clear that they are both L.
bowkeri. A view shared by Barker ( determinavit labels,
no dates). We have not seen any collections of true L.
orchioides from our area, and this species appears to be
confined to the extreme southwestern part of the Western
Cape. A large number of other specimens of L. bowkeri
have been misidentified in herbaria as this species.
Lachenalia pustulata Jacq.
A Western Cape species. Baker (1897) cited a single
specimen for the summer rainfall area: Ecklon & Zeyher
38 (PRE!), Zwartkops River, Uitenhage. This specimen
is L. bowkeri Baker, a view shared by Barker {determi-
navit label, no date).
Lachenalia reflexa Thunb.
Baker (1897) cited Bolus 2635 (K!) from the Zuurberg
Range, Alexandria Div. in the Eastern Cape. This was
incorrectly determined and is L. algoensis. A view shared
by Barker ( determinavit label, 9/5/1967).
Another collection, just out of the province, Fourcade
1447 (K!), (locality Knysna), is also L. algoensis incor-
rectly determined as L. reflexa.
Lachenalia trichophylla Baker
Baker originally cited the type of L. trichophylla as
MacOwan 2197 from Somerset East, i.e. within the
Eastern Cape, and cited no other specimens. In Flora
capensis (Baker 1897), however, he cited a single speci-
men for the species: Mader sub herb. MacOwan 2167
from Clanwilliam (in the Western Cape). The reason for
this change is unknown but MacOwan in his list of dis-
tributed collections recorded MacOwan 2197 as Catha
edulis , whereas MacOwan 2167 is recorded as Gladiolus
spathaceus. No specimens of a Lachenalia bearing the
collection number 2197 have been traced in relevant
herbaria; however, specimens of Mader sub herb.
MacOwan 2167 are present in K and SAM. The descrip-
tion of L. trichophylla does not match any known Eastern
Cape material, but does agree with the Mader specimens,
and other material from the Western Cape referred to as
L. trichophylla. It is concluded that the original citation
contains two errors, firstly the collection number should
have been 2167 not 2197, and the specimen was not col-
lected in Somerset East.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
149
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
Acocks 16543 (3) PRE; 21174 (6) PRE; 21461 (1) PRE. Anon. s.n. (4)
GRA. Archibald 4388 (2) GRA; 4522 (1) GRA; 5983 (2) GRA.
Barber 444 (4) TCD. Barnard 574 (2) PRE. Bayliss 5919 (7) PRE;
7102 (5) NBG. Bolus 719 (3) K. Borman s.n. sub RUH10632 (4) GRA.
Botha 5881 (2) PRE. Bowker s.n. (2) K; 444 (4) K. Burrows 2157 (8)
PRE; 5355(1) GRA.
Clark DC1014 (5) GRA, K; 1031 (5) GRA, PRE. Cook 20452 (2) BOL.
Cotterrell 52 (3) GRA. Courtenay-Latimer s.n. sub NBG72287 (5)
NBG. Cruden 5a (2) GRA; 22 (2) GRA; 388 (1) PRE; 453 (2) GRA.
Dold 233 (3) GRA, PRE; 280 (2) GRA, K; 691 (1) GRA; 1018 (4)
GRA. K; 1765 (2) GRA; 1766 (2) GRA; 1802 (5) GRA. PRE; 1993 (3)
GRA, PRE; 2076 (3) GRA, K, PRE; 2267. 2268. (2) GRA; 2269 (2)
GRA, PRE; 2270 (2) GRA; 2272 (2) GRA; 2273 (5) GRA; 2417 (5)
GRA; 2418 (2) GRA; 2419 (2) GRA, PRE; 2420 (2) GRA. Drege s.n.
(1) GRA; s.n. (1) GRA : s.n. (2) GRA; 61 (1) GRA; 64 (1) GRA, PRE
Dyer 2085 (2) GRA.
Ecklon 38 (2) PRE. Esterhuysen 10702 (6) BOL.
Fourcade 347 (6) BOL, GRA; 3044 (2) BOL; 4694 (2) BOL; 5350 (6)
BOL; 5385 (6) BOL; 6213 (6) BOL. Fries 182 (1) PRE.
Galpin 228 (2) PRE; 1689 (3) PRE; 6280 (3) BOL, GRA, PRE. Giffen
782a (2) BOL, UFH. Gilfillan sub Herb Galpin s.n. (8) PRE. Gillett
1266 (6) BOL.
Hilliard & Burn 14718 (3) NU, PRE; 18667 (3) KEI, NU. PRE. Hops
33 (6) BOL: sub Bolus 12393 (6) PRE, BOL. Hutton s.n. (2) GRA
Jacot-Guillarmod 9431 (2) GRA. Jessop 1071 (2) GRA. Johnson 1032
(2) GRA.
Koopowitz s.n. (2) GRA.
Laughton 47 (6) BOL. Liebenberg 7248 (8) PRE. Linger 2099 (2) PRE.
Long s.n. (1) PEU; 436 (1) GRA, PEU, PRE.
MacOwan 1337 (2) GRA; 1836 (3) GRA, K. Martin 9252 (2) GRA.
McGaffin RUH1391 (6) GRA. Meyer 206 (8) PRE.
Paterson 10 (2) PRE; 42 (2) BOL; 91 (2) GRA. Pym s.n. (4) GRA.
Rodin 1025 ( 1 ) PRE. Rogers 3092 ( 1 ) GRA); 3093 (2) GRA; 23796 (6)
PRE; 27962 (6) GRA.
Schonland s.n. (1) GRA. Seagrief s.n. (6) GRA. Skinner 5 (2) GRA.
Story 2773 (2) PRE.
Tait 155 (PEU); 376i. 376ii (1 ) PEU.
Urton 962 (2) GRA.
Van Der Walt 256 (3) PRE. Vlok 1207 (6) K.
West 231 (6) GRA; 338 (2) GRA; 339 (1) GRA. White 351 (2) GRA.
Williamson s.n. (4) TCD.
Young sub Bolus 5545 (6) BOL. K.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We wish to thank the following people: Mr B. Burtt,
Mr D. Clarke, Ms M. Cocks, Mr W. Cowley, Dr G.
Hutchings, Mrs D. Page and Mr J. Sephton for assistance
in finding Lachenalia populations; Ms M. Johnson,
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, for cytology; Dr J. Parnell,
Trinity College, Dublin, for archival information; Prof.
C.E.J. Botha, Rhodes University Botany Department,
and Rhodes University Research Committee for funding;
Mr E. Kruger for photographs; the curators of BOL,
GRA, K, KEI, NBG, NU, PEU, PRE, TCD and UFH for
loans of their material.
REFERENCES
ARNOLD, T.H. & DE WET, B.C. 1993. Plants of southern Africa:
names and distribution. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of
South Africa No. 62. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria.
BAKER, J.G. 1871. Lachenalia convallarioides. Journal of the Lin-
nean Society 11: 407.
BAKER, J.G. 1874. Lachenalia campanulata. Journal of Botany 12: 6.
BAKER, J.G. 1897. Liliaceae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora capensis
6: 421-436. Reeve, London.
BARKER, W.F. 1978. Ten new species of Lachenalia. Journal of South
African Botany 44: 391-418.
BARKER, W.F. 1979. Ten more new species of Lachenalia. Journal of
South African Botany 45: 193-219.
BATTEN, A. & BOKELMANN, H. 1966. Wild flowers of the eastern
Cape Province. Books of Africa, Cape Town.
BOND, P & GOLDBLATT. P. 1984. Plants of the Cape flora. A
descriptive catalogue. Journal of South African Botany, Suppl.
Vol. 13: 51-54.
DUNCAN, G.D 1988. The Lachenalia handbook. Annals of Kirsten-
bosch Botanical Gardens 17. National Botanical Institute, Cape
Town.
DUNCAN, G.D. 1996. Four new species of Lachenalia (Hyacin-
thaceae) from arid areas of South Africa. Bothalia 26: 1-9.
DUNCAN, G.D. 1997. Five new species of Lachenalia (Hyacin-
thaceae) from arid areas of South Africa. Bothalia 27: 7-15.
FOURCADE, H.G. 1934. Lachenalia haarlemensis and L. subspicata.
Contributions to the flora of the Knysna and neighbouring divi-
sions. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 21:
75-102.
FOURCADE, H.G. 1941. Check list of the flowering plants of the divi-
sions of George, Knysna, Humansdorp and Uniondale. Memoirs
of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 20.
GLEDHILL, E. 1981. Eastern Cape veld flowers. Creda Press, Cape
Town.
GUNN. M. & CODD, L.E. 1981. Botanical exploration of southern
Africa. Balkema, Cape Town.
HALL, H. 1856. Map of the eastern frontier from military and other
surveys. Edward Stanford, London.
JOHNSON, M.A.T. & BRANDHAM, P.E. 1997. New chromosome
numbers in petaloid monocotyledons and in other miscellaneous
angiosperms. Kew Bulletin 52: 121-138.
MARTIN, A.R.H. & NOEL. A.R.A. 1960. The flora of Albany and
Bathurst. Rhodes University, Grahamstown.
MORIARTY. A. 1982. South African wild flower guide 2. Outeniqua,
Tsitsikamma and eastern Little Karoo. Botanical Society of
South Africa, Cape Town.
ORNDUFF. R. & WAITERS, P.J. 1978 Chromosome numbers in
Lachenalia. Journal of South African Botany 44: 387-398.
SCHONLAND, S. 1910. On some flowering plants from the neigh-
bourhood of Port Elizabeth. Transactions of the Royal Society of
South Africa 1: 441^146,
THORPE, C. 1977. Tharfteld. An eastern Cape farm. Thorpe, Port
Alfred.
URTON, N. & PAGE, D. 1993. Plants of the Swartkops Valley
Bushveld. Zwartkops Trust, Port Elizabeth.
WHITE, F. 1983. The vegetation of Africa. UNESCO, Paris.
Bothalia 28,2: 151-157 (1998)
FSA contributions 12: Plantaginaceae
H.F. GLEN*
Annual or perennial herbs. Leaves simple, usually all
in a basal rosette or sometimes (in perennials) cauline,
spirally arranged, venation parallel; stipules 0. Inflores-
cence a dense to lax spike; peduncle usually longer than
inflorescence. Flowers bisexual, regular, small, brac-
teate. Calyx 4-lobed. membranous, imbricate. Corolla 4-
lobed. Stamens 4, inserted on corolla tube. Ovary > 2-4-
locular, superior; style 1, filiform, long, often exserted;
ovules 1-many in each locule. Fruit a circumscissile cap-
sule. Seeds mostly 2-4 per capsule (± 15-25 in P. major),
mostly ± boat-shaped with ventral hilum.
A family of three genera, only one of which is repre-
sented in southern Africa.
8116000 PLANTAGO
Plantago L., Species plantarum edn 1: 112 (1753);
T.Cooke: 388 (1910); Pilg.: 1 (1937); Levyns: 729 (1950);
Verde.: 1 (1971); R.A.Dyer: 601 (1975). Type species: P.
major L.
Description as for family.
A cosmopolitan genus of over 250 species, of which 12
and one variety occur in southern Africa. Five species are
restricted to the Flora area, another five are introduced
and two are weedy plants of such wide distribution as to
make it impossible to determine whether they are indige-
nous or naturalised here. Two species of doubtful occur-
rence in the Flora area are appended to this treatment.
Note: in the descriptions and notes below, the word
‘scape’ is used to mean the whole inflorescence including
both peduncle and spike.
la Leaves petiolate, or at least narrowed towards base:
2a Leaves broad (up to 4 times as long as wide):
3a Seeds 15-25 per capsule; leaves with scattered hairs,
usually drying greenish 1 . P. major
3b Seeds 2-4 per capsule; leaves glabrous or with isolated
hairs, usually drying brown to almost black
3. P. longissima
2b Leaves narrow (more than 4 times as long as wide):
4a Spike less than half as long as peduncle 10. P. lanceolata
4b Spike more than half as long as peduncle:
5a Leaves densely shaggy I P. virginica
5b Leaves with scattered hairs 9. P. myosuros
lb Leaves amplexicaul, not narrowing towards base:
6a Leaves distinctly cauline;
7a Bracts long, conspicuous, projecting well beyond the
flowers; leaves not succulent 12. P. aristata
7b Bracts short, inconspicuous, not projecting beyond the
flowers; leaves semi-succulent 6 . P. crassifolia
6b Leaves all in a basal rosette:
8a Leaves lorate, margins with a few small teeth:
9a Leaves glabrous 4. P. remota
9b Leaves villous 8. P. rhodosperma
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria.
MS. received: 1994-06-23
8b Leaves linear-pinnatifid or linear-filiform:
10a Leaves pinnatifid; spike over 20 mm long ... 5. P. coronopus
10b Leaves linear-filiform, not pinnatifid; spike less than
20 mm long:
1 1 a Plants hirsute 1 1 . P cafra
lib Plants glabrous 2. P. bigelovii
1. P. major L., Species plantarum edn 1, 112
(1753); Decne.: 694 (1852); T.Cooke: 388 (1910); Pilg.:
41 (1937); Levyns: 729 (1950); Verde.: 2 (1971). Type:
perhaps Sweden, LINN 144.1 (LINN).
P. dregeana Decne.: 695 (1852); T.Cooke: 389 (1910). Type: Cape,
near Nieuwjaarsfontein, Drege s.n. (P).
Perennial herbs, very variable. Leaves in a basal
rosette, elliptical, ovate or obovate, 70-400 x 24-125
mm, glabrous, rarely pubescent; petiole flattened,
25-200 mm long. Scapes several per rosette, 150-300
mm long; spikes 40-135 mm long. Bracts usually
glabrous, sometimes pubescent, apices acute. Calyx lobes
elliptical, ±2x1 mm, winged, acute. Corolla lobes del-
toid, ± 1.2 x 0.7 mm, acute. Capsule ellipsoid, ±3x2
mm (Figure ID). Seeds rounded-tetrahedral, 15-25 per
capsule, black to dark brown, 1.0-1. 2 x 0.6-0. 9 mm,
hilum scar at apex, small. Flowering time: from spring to
autumn.
A common weed of moist, sunny places; indigenous
or naturalised throughout most of the world. Known from
Northern Province to Western Cape and in Namibia
(Figure 2).
Vouchers: Archibald 4947 (PRE); Galpin 2945 (PRE); Mogg 4838
(PRE); Muir 1911 (PRE); Thode All 85 (K, NH, PRE).
This plant is easily confused with P. longissima (no.
3), but may be distinguished from that species by its
many-seeded capsules. Leaves of this species usually dry
olive-green and have scattered hairs, whereas those of P.
longissima usually dry various shades of brown to black,
and are glabrous or have only isolated hairs.
Plants of P. major are occasionally seen on sale in the
herb sections of nurseries in South Africa. The medicinal
uses of this species are similar to those of P. lanceolata',
Watt & Breyer-Brandwijk (1963) and Roberts (1983)
may be consulted for further details.
2. P. bigelovii A. Gray in Whipple, Exploration and
surveys for a railroad route from the Mississippi River to
the Pacific Ocean 4: 117 (1857); Pilg.: 73 (1937); Levyns:
730 (1950). Type: California, Benicia, Bigelow s.n. (GH).
Annual herbs. Leaves in a basal rosette, linear to fili-
form, 30-40 x 0.3-0. 6 mm, glabrous, amplexicaul.
Scapes few per rosette, 30-150 mm long; spikes 1. 5-5.0
mm long, few-flowered. Bracts pilose, obtuse. Calyx
lobes elliptic, ± 1.5 x 1.3 mm, winged, subobtuse.
152
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 1. — A-C, Plantago lanceo-
lata L.: A, habit, x 0.5; B,
young fruit, x 5; C, dehisced
fruit and seeds, x 5. D,
Plantago major L., fruits and
seeds, x 5.
Corolla lobes deltoid to elliptic, ± 0.6 x 0.4 mm, acute.
Capsule ellipsoid, ± 3 mm long. Seeds not seen.
A western United States species, recorded once from
the Cape Peninsula by Levyns (Figure 3).
Voucher: Levyns 5092 (BOL, K).
This is the smallest species of Plantago occurring in
our area. While it would be difficult to confuse it with
any other southern African species of Plantago except P.
cafra (no. 1 1), it bears a striking superficial resemblance
to a species of Kyllinga (Cyperaceae). The most striking
difference between this species and P cafra is that in this
species all parts are glabrous, whereas in the latter the
peduncle in particular (but also the leaves) is covered
with brownish hairs.
3. P. longissima Decne. in DC., Prodromus 13:
720(1 852); T.Cooke: 390(1910); Pilg.: 81 (1937). Type:
Eastern Cape, between Umtata and Umsamwubo, Drege
4711 (P).
P. burchellii Decne.: 720 (1852). P. longissima Decne. var. burkei
Pilg.: 82 (1937). Type: KwaZulu-Natal, Mooi River, Burke s.n. (K).
P. longissima Decne. var. densiuscula Pilg.: 82 (1937). Type:
Mpumalanga, near Lydenburg, Wilms 1247 (B).
Perennial herbs. Leaves cauline, often with woolly
bases, elliptical, ovate or obovate, 190-725 x 45-150
mm, glabrous; petiole flattened, 50-400 mm long. Scape
one per rosette, 0.40-1.12 m long; spikes 0.15-0.50 m
long. Bracts glabrous, apices acute. Calyx lobes ellipti-
cal, ± 2.5 x 1 .0 mm, winged, acute. Corolla lobes del-
toid, ± 2.0 x 1 .2 mm, acute. Capsule ellipsoid, ± 3.0 x 1 .5
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
153
FIGURE 2. — Distribution of Plantago major in southern Africa.
mm. Seeds rounded-tetrahedral, 2-4 per capsule, black to
dark brown, 1-2 x 0.6-0. 8 mm, hilum scar at apex,
small. Flowering time : from October to February.
FIGURE 3. — Distribution of Plantago bigelovii, •; and P virginica,
▲. in southern Africa.
Burser 10: 89 (UPS) (fide C. Jarvis & L.L. Dreyer pers.
comm.)
Endemic in Eastern Cape, KwaZulu-Natal, Mpuma-
langa, Gauteng and Northern Province (Figure 4).
Vouchers: Moss 8718 (BM); Phillips 570 (PRE); Rodin 3854 (K.
MO. PRE); Rudatis 1783 (PRE. STE).
This species is often confused with P. major (no. 1);
see there for distinguishing characters.
4. P. remota Lam., Tableau encyclopedique et
methodique 1; 341 (1791); Decne.: 721 (1852); T.Cooke:
391 (1910); Pilg.: 96 (1937); Levyns; 730 (1950). Type:
Cape of Good Hope, Sonnerat s.n. (P).
P. capensis Thunb.: 29 (1794); Thunb.: 148 (1823). Type: Cape of
Good Hope, Thunberg 3503 (UPS, holo.; PRE, fiche!).
Perennial herbs. Leaves in a basal rosette, linear to
lanceolate or oblanceolate, 50-210 x 2-9 mm. glabrous,
amplexicaul. Scapes few per rosette, 200-400 mm long;
spikes 30-125 mm long. Bracts glabrous, apices acute to
acuminate. Calyx lobes narrowly deltoid, ±3x1 mm,
narrowly winged, acute. Corolla lobes deltoid, ± 1.4 x 0.8
mm, acute. Capsule ellipsoid, ±2x1 mm. Seeds boat-
shaped, 2-4 per capsule, black to dark brown, 2. 2-3.0 x
1.0-1. 9 mm, hilum scar in a ventral depression almost as
long as seed. Flowering time', throughout the year.
Endemic to the Western and Eastern Cape (Figure 4).
Vouchers: Britten 6485 (PRE); Dyer 2400 (PRE); Esterhuysen 15454
(BOL, PRE); Glass 443 (NBG); Wolley Dod 2403 (BM, BOL, K, PRE).
This species is similar to P. crassifolia (no. 6) in that it
has semi-succulent, linear leaves, but differs from that
species in having all the leaves basal and glabrous except
for a tuft of copper-coloured woolly hairs at the base, and
in its generally more inland distribution.
5. P. coronopus L., Species plantarum 115 (1753);
Decne.; 732 (1852); Pilg.: 126 (1937); Levyns: 730
(1950); Chater & Cartier: 40 (1976). Lectotype: Herb.
Annual herbs. Leaves in a basal rosette, appressed-hor-
izontal, linear-pinnatifid, 40-200 x 2-5 mm, pubescent,
amplexicaul. Scapes many per rosette, 70-320 mm long;
peduncles horizontal below, erect above; spikes erect,
20-120 mm long. Bracts glabrescent, apices acute. Calyx
lobes narrowly elliptic, ±2x1 mm, acute. Corolla lobes
deltoid, ± 1.0 x 0.7 mm, subacute. Capsule ellipsoid, ±
2.5 x 2.0 mm. Seeds rounded-tetrahedral, 2-4 per cap-
sule, greenish brown, 1.0-1. 3 x 0. 6-0.7 mm, hilum scar
at apex, small. Flowering time : September to December.
A cosmopolitan weed, introduced from Europe; in our
area only known with certainty from the Western Cape,
where it is very common, if not locally dominant in small
areas, on paths leading to beaches, picnic areas and other
disturbed areas from Elands Bay on the west coast to
Pearly Beach near Bredasdorp, and possibly further
afield. Flanagan 1377 (PRE) from near Komga (Eastern
Cape) probably belongs here (Figure 5).
Vouchers: Glen 1518 (PRE); Moss 9082 (J); Oliver 3718 (PRE);
Salter 8516 (BOL, K, NBG); Walgate 617 (BOL, NBG).
FIGURE 4. — Distribution of Plantago longissima. ▲; and P. remota,
O, in southern Africa.
154
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 5. — Distribution of Plantago coronopus, •; and P. myosuros,
A. in southern Africa.
This species is immediately distinguishable from all
others in southern Africa by its linear-pinnatifid leaves.
6. P. crassifolia Forssk ., Flora aegyptiaco-arabica
62 (1775); Pilg. : 160 (1937). Type: Egypt, Alexandria,
Forsskdl 261 (C).
P carnosa Lam.: 342 (1791); Decne.: 729 (1852); T.Cooke: 393
(1910); Levyns: 730 (1950). Type not cited.
P litoraria Fourc.: 96 (1934). Type: Western Cape, Eerste River,
Fourcade 1961 (BOL!).
Perennial herbs or suffrutices. Leaves cauline, linear to
narrowly lanceolate, 30-260 x 4-10 mm, pubescent,
amplexicaul. Scapes few per rosette, 90-300 mm long;
spikes 30-75 mm long. Bracts with scattered villi, apices
subacute. Calyx lobes elliptical, ± 2.5 x 1.5 mm, narrowly
winged, subacute. Corolla lobes deltoid, ± 1 .5 x 1.0 mm,
subacute. Capsule ellipsoid, ± 3.0 x 1.5 mm. Seeds boat-
shaped, 2-4 per capsule, brown, 1.8-2. 3 x 0.9-1. 2 mm,
hilum scar in a central depression about half as long as
seed. Flowering throughout the year, mostly in summer.
Two varieties can be distinguished:
la Leaves long and narrow, rarely less than 100 mm long . . .
6a. var. crassifolia
lb Leaves short and wide, rarely over 50 mm long ... 6b. var. hirsuta
6a. var. crassifolia.
Description as for species.
Occurs in the Mediterranean Basin and in southern
Africa, where it is known from the Western and Eastern
Cape (Figure 6).
Vouchers: Acocks 17610 (PRE); Boucher 3004 (PRE); Bourke 698
(NBG, PRE); Taylor 3178 (PRE, STE); Wells 2678 (GRA, K, PRE).
This species is usually a beach-dweller, in contrast
with P. remota (no. 4), which usually occurs in more
inland situations. In addition to the distinctions men-
tioned under that species, the present one may be disting-
uished from it by having entire or very sparsely, coarse-
ly dentate leaf margins. In P. remota the leaf margins are
sparsely minutely dentate.
6b. var. hirsuta (Thunb.) Beg. in Bulletino della
Societa botanica italiana 1901: 252 (1901); Pilg.: 162
(1937). Type: Cape of Good Hope, Thunberg 3518 (UPS,
holo.; PRE, fiche !).
P. hirsuta Thunb.: 29 (1794).
P thunbergii Poir.: 431 (1816). Type: Jacquin, Hort. Schoenbr. 3: t. 258
(PRE, icono.!).
Plants smaller in all parts than the typical variety.
Leaves more densely rosulate.
Occurs in the Western and Eastern Cape (Figure 6).
Vouchers: Bayliss 4182 (NBG); H. Hall s.n. in NBG97433 (NBG);
Schlechter 10551 (BOL, GRA).
7. P. virginica L., Species plantarum edn 1, 113
(1753); Michx.: 94 (1803); Decne.: 722 (1852); Pilg.:
213 (1937); Rahn: 154 (1974). Type: probably North
America, Kalm s.n. in LINN 144.8 (LINN).
Perennial herbs. Leaves in a basal rosette, obovate or
narrowly spathulate, 33-220 x 9-40 mm, densely vil-
lous; petiole flattened, 15-50 mm long. Scapes few per
rosette, 170-360 mm long; spikes 90-200 mm long.
Bracts glabrous, apices acute. Calyx lobes elliptical, ± 2
x 1 mm, subacute. Corolla lobes deltoid, ± 2.5 x 1.3 mm,
acute. Capsule ellipsoid, ± 3.5 x 2.0 mm. Seeds narrow-
ly tetrahedral, 2-4 per capsule, greenish brown, 1.4- 1.9
x 0.7-1 .0 mm, hilum scar at apex, small. Flowering time:
throughout the year, mainly in summer.
Originally introduced from North America (see Rahn
1974 for the indigenous distribution of this species), P.
virginica is now a widespread weed in southern Africa
(Figure 3).
Vouchers: Acocks 11450 (NH, PRE); Balsinhas 2905 (K, MO,
PRE); Code l 6455 (PRE); Jacob si. 2147 (NBG, PRE); Strey 3033 (K,
PRE, SRGH).
FIGURE 6. — Distribution of Plantago crassifolia var. crassifolia, A;
and P. crassifolia var. hirsuta, O, in southern Africa.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
155
FIGURE 7. — Distribution of Plantago rhodusperma , •; P. cafra, ▲;
and P. aristata, ★, in southern Africa.
The densely villous leaves distinguish this species
from all others in southern Africa. In shape, the leaves
resemble a miniature form of P. major (no. 1).
7.0-12.5 mm, glabrous, rarely pubescent; petiole flat-
tened, 25-100 mm long. Scapes few per rosette, 60-180
mm long; spikes 20-66 mm long. Bracts densely pilose,
apices acute. Calyx lobes narrowly elliptic, ± 2.5 x 1.0
mm, not winged, acute. Corolla lobes narrowly deltoid,
±2.5x1 .0 mm, acute. Capsule ellipsoid, ± 3.0 x 1.5 mm.
Seeds narrowly tetrahedral, 2-4 per capsule, pale yel-
lowish brown, 1.4-1. 6 x 0. 8-1.0 mm, hilum scar at apex,
small. Flowering time: January.
A weed introduced from South America (see Rahn
1974 for indigenous distribution); known in our area
from the Eastern Cape, and Mpumalanga (Figure 5).
Vouchers: Codd 9885 (PRE); Galpin 8230 (PRE); Hilliard & Burn
7557 (PRE); Jacot Guillarmod 8900 (GRA, PRE); Sim 19557 (PRE).
This species is superficially similar to P lanceolata
(below), from which it may be distinguished by its in-
florescences, in which the spikes are about as long as the
peduncles, whereas in P. lanceolata they are much short-
er than the peduncles. The hilum scar on the seeds is
raised in this species, but depressed in P. lanceolata and
P. rhodosperma (no. 8).
8. P. rhodosperma Decne. in DC., Prodromus 13:
722 (1852); Pilg.: 217 (1913); Pilg.: 12 (1928); Pilg.: 214
(1937); Rahn: 134 (1974). Type: Texas, Anon. s.n. in
herb. De Candolle (G).
Annual herbs. Leaves in a basal rosette, linear,
115-120 x 5-8 mm, densely villous, amplexicaul.
Scapes many per rosette, 50-300 mm long; spikes
10-180 mm long. Bracts villous, apices acute. Calyx
lobes narrowly elliptic, ±2x1 mm, subacute. Corolla
lobes broadly deltoid, ± 2.0 x 1.7 mm, acute. Capsule
ellipsoid, ±3x2 mm. Seeds boat-shaped, 2-4 per cap-
sule, greenish brown, 1.4— 1.9 x 0. 6-1.0 mm, hilum scar
in a ventral depression almost half as long as seed.
Flowering time : December.
This species was introduced from North America
(see Rahn 1974 for indigenous distribution); in our area
it is only known from the Eastern Cape (Figure 7).
Vouchers: Rattray 229 (GRA, K); C.A. Smith 3690 (PRE).
While the leaves and peduncles of P. myosuros
(below) have scattered hairs, those of the present species
are densely villous. P. rhodosperma differs from P.
lanceolata (no. 10) in that the spikes are as long as or
longer than the peduncles in the former species but much
shorter in the latter. It differs from P. remota (no. 4) in
having densely villous leaves and dense spikes, rather
than glabrous leaves and lax spikes. P. rhodosperma dif-
fers from P. virginica (above) in having narrower leaves
(both absolutely and in proportion to their length), vil-
lous (not glabrous) bracts and broader corolla lobes.
10. P. lanceolata L., Species plantarum edn 1:113
(1753); Decne.: 714 (1852); T.Cooke: 389 (1910); Pilg.:
313 (1937); Levyns: 730 (1950); Verde.: 6 (1971);
Troupin: 505 (1985). Type: specimen of Plantago angus-
tifolia major in Hort. Cliff, p. 36 no. 3 (BM, lecto.).
Perennial herbs, very variable. Leaves in a basal
rosette, linear to narrowly lanceolate or oblanceolate,
65-370 x 6-35 mm, glabrous or pubescent; petiole
30-125 mm long. Scapes many per rosette, 250-750 mm
long; spikes 15-70 mm long. Bracts glabrescent, apices
subobtuse. Calyx lobes elliptic, ± 2.5 x 1.3 mm, winged,
obtuse. Corolla lobes deltoid, ± 2.0 x 1.2 mm, acute.
Capsule ellipsoid, ± 3.5 x 1.5 mm. Seeds boat-shaped,
2-4 per capsule, dark brown, 24-2.8 x 1.2-1 .6 mm,
hilum scar in a ventral depression almost as long as seed.
Flowering throughout the year, but mainly in summer.
Figure 1A-C.
A very common weed of cultivation and disturbed
places; a typical habitat for this species is between
paving stones on urban pavements (sidewalks). This
species is indigenous or naturalised almost throughout
the world and is widely distributed in southern Africa
(Figure 8), even reaching Tristan da Cunha.
Vouchers: Boucher 1732 (PRE, STE); Dahlstrand 3570 (MO, PRE);
Marloth 10044 (PRE); Reid 307 (PRE); Van Jaarsveld 3127 (PRE).
Differences between this species on the one hand and
P. myosuros (above) and P. rhodosperma (no. 8) on the
other, are dealt with under those species. The medicinal
uses of this species are similar to those of P. major (no. 1).
9. P. myosuros Lam., Tableau encyclopedique et
methodique 1: 342 (1791); Decne.: 723 (1852); Pilg.:
244 (1913); Pilg.: 16 (1928); Pilg.: 226 (1937); Rahn:
115 (1974). Type: Uruguay, Commerson s.n. (P).
Annual or perennial herbs. Leaves in a basal rosette,
linear to narrowly lanceolate or oblanceolate, 90-120 x
11. P. cafra Decne. in DC., Prodromus 13: 719
(1852); T.Cooke: 389 (1910); Pilg.: 463 (1922); Pilg.:
352 (1937); Friedr.-Holzh.: 1 (1968). Type: Western
Cape, Riebeeck Kasteel, Drege s.n. (P).
R capillaris E.Mey. ex Decne.: 719 (1852); T.Cooke: 390 (1910). P.
cafra Decne. forma capillaris (E.Mey.) Pilg.: 464 (1922); Pilg.: 352
(1937). Type: Western Cape, Olifants River, Drege s.n. (K!).
156
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 8. — Distribution of Plantago lanceolata in southern Africa.
Annual herbs. Leaves in a basal rosette, linear to fili-
form, acuminate, 32-144 x 0. 2-2.0 mm, pubescent,
amplexicaul. Scapes several per rosette, 12-130 mm
long; spikes 4-17 mm long. Bracts with scattered villi,
acuminate. Calyx lobes narrowly elliptic, ± 2.0 x 1.5
mm, winged, obtuse. Corolla lobes narrowly deltoid, ±
1.2 x 0.4 mm, acuminate. Capsule ellipsoid, ± 4.5 x 2.5
mm. Seeds boat-shaped, 2-4 per capsule, 2.3-4. 1 x
0.8-1.25 mm, brown or greenish brown, hilum scar in a
ventral depression almost as long as seed. Flowering
time : August-September.
Endemic to the Western and Northern Cape (Figure
7). According to Pilger (1937) and Friedrich-Holzham-
mer (1968), also known from one collection from
Warmbad District, Namibia.
Vouchers: Acocks 14836 (PRE); Goldblatt 2274 (NBG, PRE);
Riisch & Le Roux 467 (PRE); Schlechter 4908 (BM, GRA, PRE, SAM,
STE); Strey 3881 (PRE).
Differs from P. bigelovii (no. 2) in that the leaves and
particularly the peduncles of the scapes are hirsute-vil-
lous rather than glabrous, and from all other southern
African members of the genus by its small size and lin-
ear-filiform leaves.
12. P. aristata Michx., Flora boreali-americana 1:
95 (1803); Decne.: 714 (1852); Pilg.: 366 (1937). Type:
USA, Illinois, Michaux s.n. (P).
Perennial herbs. Leaves cauline, linear, acuminate,
100-142 x 2-7 mm, thinly hirsute to glabrous, amplexi-
caul. Scapes many per stem, 200-300 mm long; spikes
100-150 mm long. Bracts glabrous or with few villi,
very narrowly deltoid, conspicuous. Calyx lobes narrow-
ly elliptic, ±4x1 mm, not winged, obtuse. Corolla lobes
± 2.0 x 1 .5 mm, obtuse. Capsule ellipsoid, ±3.5x2 mm.
Seeds boat-shaped, 2-4 per capsule, 1.9-2. 6 x 1. 1-1.3
mm, brown, hilum scar in a ventral depression almost as
long as seed. Flowering time: January-February.
A weed, indigenous to the United States of America;
rather rare in our region, known only from the Free State
and KwaZulu-Natal border area, and from one specimen
from Pretoria, Gauteng (Figure 7).
Vouchers: Burtt Davy 7104 (K, PRE); Haygarth s.n. in NH15976
(NH); Medley Wood 8858 (NH, PRE); Ward 5968 (NU, PRE).
The bracts of this species are about 20 times as long
as wide, whereas in all other southern African species
they are about twice as long as wide.
DOUBTFUL SPECIES
P. laxiflora Decne. in DC., Prodromus 13: 699
(1852); Pilg.: 81 (1937). Type: Eastern Cape, ‘between
Gekan and Baxh’, Drege s.n. (P).
Annual (?) herbs. Leaves apparently in a basal rosette,
narrowly lanceolate, 50-150 x 20-45 mm, coarsely den-
tate, glabrescent; petioles flattened. Scapes few per
rosette, 200-650 mm long; spikes 120-300 mm long.
Bracts slightly villous, acute. Calyx lobes elliptic, ± 3
mm long, not winged, acute. Corolla lobes rotund or
ovate, ± 1.4 mm long, acute. Capsule ellipsoid. Seeds
boat-shaped, dark brown to black, to 3 mm long, hilum
scar in a long ventral depression.
Pilger states that this species occurs in the Eastern
Cape, but no specimen referable to this species was seen.
The description above is based on that of Pilger.
Material matching this description should not be iden-
tifiable using the key above, which should fail at couplet
8, where neither lead describes this species, though it
matches lead 6b.
P. afra L., Species plantarum edn 2: 168 (1762);
Verde.: 6 (1971 ). Type: Malta and North Africa, Morison
Hist. 3: 262, sect. 8, t. 17/4 (syn.).
P. psyllium sensu L.: 167 ( 1762); Pilg.: 422 (1937) et auett. mult., non
L.: 115 (1753).
Annual erect herbs. Leaves opposite, subopposite or
spirally arranged, narrowly lanceolate, 21-29 x 0.9-2. 0
mm, glabrous, obtuse. Scapes several at a node, 20-50
mm long; spikes 6-11 mm long, few-flowered. Bracts
glabrescent, acuminate. Calyx lobes elliptic, ± 3.0 x 1.5
mm, narrowly winged, subacute. Corolla lobes deltoid, ±
2.0 x 1.2 mm, acute. Capsule ellipsoid, ±4x2 mm.
Seeds boat-shaped, 2-4 per capsule, 2. 7-3. 2 x 1.0-1. 4
mm, greenish brown, hilum scar in a ventral depression
almost as long as seed.
Notes attached to a specimen from Kew indicate that
this species was once cultivated experimentally in
Pretoria. No material of it as a weed or naturalised in
southern Africa was seen, though there are two cultivat-
ed specimens in the main herbarium at PRE. The above
description was prepared from the Kew specimen.
A specimen, L.L. Britten 1613 (GRA), is similar to this
species but has much denser leaves and shorter pedun-
cles. These latter give the inflorescence the overall effect
of a compound capitulum rather than a compound umbel.
It is distinguished from all other southern African
species by its erect habit and usually opposite to subop-
posite leaves. It has been cultivated in order to extract an
oil (psyllium oil) from the seeds. For opinions on the
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
157
nomenclature of this species see Pilger (1937) and
Verdcourt (1971).
REFERENCES
BEGUINOT, A. 1901. Intomo a Plantago crassifulia Forskal ed a
Plantago weldenii Rchb. nella flora italiana. Bulletino della So-
cietd botanica italiana 1901: 252-261.
CHATER, A.d & CARTIER. D. 1976. Plantaginaceae. Flora euro-
paea 4: 38^14.
COOKE. T. 1910. Plantaginaceae. Flora capensis 5,1: 387-392.
DECAISNE. J. 1852. Plantaginaceae. In A.P de Candolle, Prodromus
13: 693-737.
DYER, R.A. 1975. Genera of southern African flowering plants, Vol.
1. Government Printer, Pretoria.
FORSSKAL, P. 1775. Flora aegyptiaco-arabica. Moller, Kjobenhavn.
FOURCADE, H G. 1934. Contribution to the flora of Knysna and
neighbouring divisions. Transactions of the Royal Society of
South Africa 21 . 75-102.
FRIEDRICH-HOLZHAMMER, M. 1968. Plantaginaceae. In H. Merx-
mtiller, Prodromus einer Flora von Siidwestafrika 134: 1.
GRAY, A. 1857. Plantago bigelovii. In L.A. Whipple, Exploration and
surveys for a railroad route from the Mississippi River to the
Pacific Ocean. War Department, Washington DC.
LAMARCK, J.B.A.P.M. DE 1791. Tableau encyclopedique et me-
thodique. Pancoucke, Paris.
LEVYNS, M.R. 1950. Plantaginaceae. In R.S. Adamson & T.M. Salter,
Flora of the Cape Peninsula. Juta, Cape Town.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum, edn 1. Salvius, Stockholm
LINNAEUS, C. 1762. Species plantarum. edn 2. Salvius, Stockholm.
MICHAUX, A. 1803. Flora boreali-americana. Crapelet, Paris.
PILGER, R. 1913. Uber Plantago sectio Plantaginella Decne.
Botanische Jahrbiicher 50: 61-71.
PILGER, R. 1922. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Gattung Plantago. Fed-
des Repertorium 18: 449^175.
PILGER, R. 1928. Die Gattung Plantago in Zentral- und Siidamerika.
Botanische Jahrbiicher 62: 1-112.
PILGER, R. 1937. Plantaginaceae. In H.G.A. Engler, Das Pflanzen-
reich, Heft 102.
POIRET, J.L.M. 1816. Encyclopedic methodique Supplement. Agasse,
Paris.
RAHN, K. 1974. Plantago section Virginica : a taxonomic revision of a
group of American plantains. Dansk Botanisk Arkiv 30: 1-180.
ROBERTS, M. 1983. Margaret Roberts' book of herbs. Jonathan Ball,
Johannesburg.
THUNBERG, C.P 1794. Prodromus plantarum capensium. Edman,
Uppsala.
THUNBERG, C.P 1823. In J A. Schultes, Flora capensis. Cottae,
Stuttgart.
TROUPIN, G. 1985. Plantaginaceae. Flore du Rwanda 3: 504, 505.
VERDCOURT. B. 1971. Plantaginaceae. Flora of tropical East Africa.
Crown Agents for Oversea Governments and Administrations,
London.
WATT, J.M. & BREYER-BRANDWIJK, M.G. 1963. Medicinal and
poisonous plants of southern and eastern Africa, edn 2.
Livingstone. Edinburgh.
INDEX
Plantago L., 151
afra L., 1 56
anstata Michx., 156
bigelovii A. Gray, 1 5 1
burchellii Decne., 152
cafra Decne., 155
forma capillaris (E.Mey.) Piig., 155
capensis Thunb., 153
capillaris E.Mey. ex Decne., 155
carnosa Lam., 154
coronopus L., 153
crassifolia Forssk., 154
var. crassifolia, 154
var. hirsuta (Thunb.) Beg., 154
dregeana Decne., 151
hirsuta Thunb., 1 54
lanceolata L., 155
laxiflora Decne., 156
litoraria Fourc., 154
longissima Decne., 152
var. burkei Pilg., 152
var. densiuscula Pilg., 152
major L., 151
myosuros Lam., 155
psyllium sensu L., 156
remota Lam., 153
rhodosperma Decne., 155
thunbergii Poir., 154
virginica L., 154
Bothalia 28,2: 159-165 (1998)
Studies in the liverwort genus Fossombronia (Metzgeriales) from
southern Africa. 6. New species from Lesotho, Swaziland and
Mpumalanga and new records from Lesotho
S.M. PEROLD*
Keywords: Fossombronia , F. angulifolia, F. swaziensis, Hepaticae, Lesotho, Metzgeriales, new records, new species, southern Africa, Swaziland
ABSTRACT
Two new species of Fossombronia are described: F. angulifolia Perold from Lesotho and F. swaziensis Perold from
Swaziland and Mpumalanga. F. angulifolia is characterised by erect or semi-erect, 2— 4-lobed, angular leaves, by mostly
incompletely reticulate spores and by rather short elaters. F. swaziensis can be recognised by large, rounded or sometimes
shallowly notched leaves, which are rather stiff and bi- to multistratose basally, by quite large perigonial bracts in the male
plants and by spores which have irregular areolae containing tubercular inclusions.
1. Fossombronia angulifolia Perold , sp. nov.
Plantae repentes aggregatae. Folia subimbricata vel
subcontigua, superne plerumque bilobata, lobis angu-
laribus vadosis vel profundis. Rhizoidea purpurea.
Forsan dioicae; plantas masculas non vidi. Pseudo-
perianthium nonnihil brevius foliis contiguis, superne in
5 lobis irregularibus divisum. Sporae 27.5-45.0 pm
diametro, superficie distali lamellis 10 vel 11 irregu-
laribus ramosis et anastomosantibus, interdum areolas
formantibus; superficie proximali plerumque sine nota
triradiata, cum cristis pluribus pertenuibus irregularibus
granulatis. Elateres 52.5-90.0 pm longi, bis vel ter spi-
rales, 7.5-10.0 pm lati, interdum apices versus contracti.
TYPE. — Lesotho, 2927 (Maseru): 7.5 km west of
Roma along main tarred road and then south on dirt road
toward Korokoro, across river, on hillside above maize-
field, on soil between rocks, (-BC), S.M. Perold & M.
Koekemoer 3711 (PRE, holo.). Same locality, S.M.
Perold & M. Koekemoer 3712a (PRE, para.).
Plants smallish to medium-sized, creeping, in crowd-
ed, overlying stands, green, margins of some young
leaves tinged with red, upper part of older leaves fre-
quently dry and turning yellow, proximally becoming
colourless, occasionally several small, deep pink leaves
closely clasping basal part of stem; shoots mostly simple,
8.0-12.0 mm long, 1.2-1. 4 mm high, ± 1.9 mm wide,
rarely once furcate toward apex, sometimes with ventro-
lateral innovations. Stems prostrate, green, in cross sec-
tion apically (Figure IQ), ±310 pm (11 cell rows) high,
± 350 pm wide, basally (Figure 1R), ± 250 x 330 pm,
plano-convex. Rhizoids purple, 15.0-17.5 pm wide.
Leaves (Figure 1A-N) slightly overlapping to almost
contiguous, erect to semi-erect (Figure 2A, B), obliquely
inserted succubously, sinuous above and mostly 2-lobed,
rarely 3- or 4-lobed, with shallow or deep angular lobes,
dissimilar or similar in size and shape, lateral sides of
leaves ± parallel or not, distally smaller, gradually
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria.
MS. received: 1998-03-26.
enlarging proximally, (975-)1225-1450 x (500-)875-
1375 pm, margins with 6-8, generally one-celled slime
papillae at angulations as well as elsewhere, closer
together at ‘trailing’ edge. Leaf cells (Figure lO) thin-
walled, at upper margins subquadrate to rectangular
across, 20.0-25.0 x 27.5-57.5 pm, at lateral margins
short- to long-rectangular, 30.0-92.5 x 12.5-27.5 pm;
upper laminal cells (4-)5- or 6-sided or polygonal, 35.0-
47.5 x 27.5-50.0 pm; middle laminal cells 50.0- 57.5 x
30.0- 40.0 pm; basal cells 50.0-62.5 x 37.5-50.0 pm. Oil
bodies hyaline (Figure IP), slightly granular, 9-18 per
cell, round, oval or irregularly shaped, 3-6 pm diam.;
chloroplasts numerous, ± 5 pm diam.
?Dioicous; no male plants seen, only females.
Archegonia dorsally scattered along stem, naked (Figure
2C), few becoming fertilised. Pseudoperianths (Figure
2D-F) single, ± 1500 pm long (Figure 1U), ± 250 pm
shorter than adjacent leaves, divided above into 5 irregu-
lar lobes (Figure IV), up to 1685 pm wide across mouth,
with 15 or 16 spinous processes topped by a slime papil-
la; cells comparable in shape and size to those of leaves,
except for those in basal part, which are larger,
75.0- 125.0 x 27.5-35.0 pm. Capsule globose, ± 600 pm
diam., capsule wall bistratose, cells in inner layer irregu-
larly shaped, variable in size, 30.0-50.0 x 25.0- 32.5
pm, each cell wall with 1-3 nodular (Figure IS) and very
rare semi-annular thickenings. Seta delicate, ± 1.4 mm
long, in cross section (Figure IT) 200 x 150 pm, 8 cells
across. Spores light brown, hemispherical or occasional-
ly ± oval-shaped in outline, (27. 5-)32. 5-45.0 pm diam.,
including low spines projecting around periphery (Figure
3C); distal face convex, with 10 or 1 1 irregular lamellae
across it (Figure 3A, B), branching and anastomosing,
sometimes forming areolae, 5.0-12.5 x 5.0 pm, walls
slightly raised at corners, surface between lamellae fine-
ly granular (Figure 3D); proximal face (Figure 3E) most-
ly lacking distinct triradiate mark, with numerous very
fine, irregular ridges liberally sprinkled with granules,
around periphery many fine spines, shorter than 2.5 pm.
Elaters (Figure 3F) yellow-brown, (52. 5-)60. 0-70.0
(-90.0) pm long, often 3-spiral and uniformly up to 10
pm wide or tapering slightly toward tips, sometimes 2-
spiral, 7.5-10.0 pm wide, tips 5.0 pm wide.
160
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE I — Fossombmnia angulifolia. A-N, leaves; O, detail of leaf margin; P, median leaf cells with oil bodies (solid lines) and chloroplasts
(dotted lines); Q, c/s of stem apex; R, c/s of stem base; S, cells in capsule wall; T, c/s of seta; U, pseudoperianth from side; V, opened
pseudoperianth A-V, S.M. Perold & M Koekemoer 37 1 1 Scale bars: A-N, U, V, 500 pm; O, T, 100 pm; P, S, 50 pm; Q, R, 250 pm. Artist:
G. Condy.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
161
FIGURE 2. — Fossombronia angulifolia. A, arched terminal segment of thallus and leaves from side; B, shoot and leaves partly from side; C, archego-
nia seen from above; D, pseudopenanth (in culture stem continued growth beyond pseudoperianth); E, different shoot with pseudo-
perianth; F, close-up of pseudoperianth. A-F. S.M. Perold & M. Koekemoer 3711 . A, x 15.7; B, x 14.2; C, E, x 19.7; D, x 1 1; F, x 37.6.
Fossombronia angulifolia is known only from the type
locality in the Mountain Kingdom of Lesotho (Figure 4)
which receives rain in summer and occasional snowfalls in
winter. The two specimens referred to here were collected
in autumn after a season of good rains. Part of the holotype
specimen had to be kept in cultivation for almost two
months to allow the spores in several capsules to ripen. No
plants with antheridia were observed, despite thorough
searching. Mosses growing together with this new species
are Bartramia hampeana C.Miill., Bryum canariense
Brid., Pseudoleskeopsis cf. claviramea (C.Miill.) Ther.,
Gigaspermum repens (Hook.) Lindb. as well as the liver-
wort, Targionia hypophylla L. The soil is derived from
weathered sandstone and is finely to somewhat coarsely
granular. The vegetation type is Afromontane Grassland
(Low & Rebelo 1996). Some of the angular two-lobed
FIGURE 3. — Fossombronia angulifolia. Spores and elaters. A, distal face; B, side view of distal face; C, detail of areolae at margin of distal face;
D, surface between lamellae on distal face; E, proximal face; F, elaters. A-F, S.M. Perold & M. Koekemoer 3711. A, x 1094; B, x 1200;
C, x 2589; D, x 3533; E, x 1 120; F, x 753.
162
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 4. — The distribution of F. angulifolia , •; and F swaziensis,
A; and some new records of F. gemmifera, 4; and F. glenii, □,
in Lesotho, Mpumalanga and Swaziland.
leaves in F. angulifolia are rather similar to those found in
F. spinifolia Steph. (Perold 1997b), but the spores in the
two species differ in their ornamentation, with those in F.
spinifolia having fewer and coarser ridges and some spin-
ous processes in between.
2. Fossombronia swaziensis Perold, sp. nov.
Plantae repentes aggregatae. Folia superne concava
vel inflexa, late patescentia, marginibus superioribus lat-
eralibusque rotundatis, basin versus bis vel multistratosa.
Rhizoidea purpurea. Dioicae. Antheridia dorsaliter bise-
riata in caule, bracteis perigonalibus concavis 1- vel 3-
lobatis obtecta. Pseudoperianthium plerumque supra
folia reflexa eminens; campanulatum; pedicellatum; ore
subpectinato, undulato. Sporae 47.5-55.0 pm diametro,
superficie distali lamellis 8 vel 9 rectis vel subcurvatis,
parallelis vel radiatis, irregulariter interconnexis areolas
imperfectas formantibus, unaquaeque tubercula 1 vel
2(3) continens; superficie proximali sine nota triradiata,
cum papillulis vel spiculis humilibus, congestis, perir-
regularibus, centro maioribus, circum peripheriam usque
ad 21 spinulis humilibus perisporio non connexis.
Elateres 80-150 pm longi, bis vel medio ter, apices ver-
sus bis, spirales, 10-15 pm lati, plerumque apices versus
contracti.
TYPE. — Swaziland, 2631 (Mbabane): Hhohho Dist.,
Forbes Reef, Umbuluzi River at Forbes Reef Store, on
clay soil of steep streambank in wattle forest, (-AA),
H.F. Glen 3130 (PRE, holo.). Same locality, H.F. Glen
3127 (PRE, para.).
Plants medium-sized to fairly large, creeping, in
crowded stands; shoots with proximal parts seemingly
from previous year, greyish brown, dead, or else growth
interrupted by dry conditions, at apex fresh, green, most-
ly simple, 8-10 mm long, ± 2 mm high, 4 mm wide (up
to 4.5 mm wide at pseudoperianth). Stems prostrate,
green, occasionally peripheral cell walls in some areas of
dorsal surface reddish, ventrally purple, in cross section
apically ± 400 pm (10 or 11 cell rows) high, ± 700 pm
wide in male plants (Figure 5N), becoming increasingly
fleshy, at ± midlength, 600 pm (16 cell rows) high, 900
pm wide, tapering toward base (Figure 50), 250 x 340
pm, plano-convex; female stems in cross section apically
± 350 x 550 pm (Figure 5P). Rhizoids purple, 17.5-27.5
pm wide. Leaves apically smaller, concave to inflexed
above, becoming widely spreading, inserted succubously,
upper and lateral margins rounded, occasionally shallow-
ly notched, often rather stiff, basally bi- to multistratose
(Figure 6C), sometimes up to ± midlength in a wide
median arch (Figure 5F), proximally increasing in size, in
male plants (Figure 5A-F) 1250-2000 x 1500-2125 pm,
somewhat larger in female plants (Figure 5G-K), shorter
than wide, 1500-2150 x 2625-3000 pm, margins at inter-
vals with 6-8 one-celled, papillae (Figure 6B), ± 22.5 x
12.5 pm, sessile or at lower ‘trailing’ edge raised on
( 1 — )2 — 4 basal cells. Leaf cells thin- walled, not apprecia-
bly different in male and female plants, at upper margins
(Figure 5L) subquadrate to rectangular across, 25.0-42.5
x 50.0-82.5 pm, at- lateral margins long-rectangular,
62.5- 97.5 x 25.0-30.0 pm; upper laminal cells 5- or 6-
sided, 40.0-57.5 x 27.5-55.0 pm; middle laminal cells
50.0- 87.5 x 30.0-62.5 pm; basal cells 60.0-97.5 x
55.0- 70.0 pm. Oil bodies disintegrated, remains execut-
ing Brownian movement on wetting; chloroplasts granu-
lar, up to 5 pm diam. (Figure 5M).
Dioicous. Antheridia dorsal on stem, often in 2 rows,
short-stalked, ± 250 pm wide, shielded by concave
perigonial bracts (Figures 5Q-S; 6D), single, 600-650 x
300-350 pm, or double, sometimes 3 lobes laterally
fused together, up to 480 x 850 pm, each one topped by
a papilla which is usually raised on a basal cell, margin-
al cells 50-75 x 45-50 pm, cells in interior 70.0-1 12.5 x
37.5- 42.5 pm. Archegonia naked, in a well-spaced dor-
sal row. Pseudoperianth (Figures 5U, V; 6E, F) ± 2 mm
proximal to apex, campanulate, raised on stalk up to
1000 pm long, mostly projecting above reflexed leaves,
1875-2250 pm long, 2750-2875 pm wide across mouth,
sometimes partly slit along side, margin slightly scal-
loped, undulating, very few or no papillae seen, toward
base with 2 irregularly thickened lateral outgrowths or
wings; cells not appreciably different in shape and size
from those in leaves. Capsules globose, ± 1000 pm
diam., wall bistratose, cells of inner layer irregularly
shaped, 30.0-37.5 x 25.0-30.0 pm, each cell wall with
1-3 dark brown nodular and some semi-annular thicken-
ings (Figure 5T). Seta ± 2.5 mm long, 200 pm diam., 9
cell rows across. Spores light brown to darker brown,
47.5- 55.0 pm diam., including lamellae projecting
around periphery, hemispherical; distal face (Figure
7A-C) convex, ornamentation irregularly lamellate and
incompletely reticulate, with 8 or 9 straight or slightly
curved parallel or radiating lamellae, their uneven crests
running across face, up to 3 pm high, 5. 0-7. 5 pm apart,
irregularly interconnected forming mostly incomplete
areolae of variable size and shape, each one containing 1
or 2 (3) tubercles (Figure 7D) with very faint ridges radi-
ating from their bases; proximal face (Figure 7E) slight-
ly concave, lacking triradiate mark, with low, crowded,
highly irregular small papillae or spicules, becoming
larger toward centre and linking up with one another,
around spore periphery up to 21 low ‘spines’, which are
the ‘ends’ of the lamellae from the distal face extending
over the sides and not connected by a perispore. Elaters
(Figure 7F) light brown, 80-150 pm long, 10-15 pm
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
163
FIGURE 5. — Fossombronia swaziensis. A-F, male leaves; G-K, female leaves; L, detail of leaf margin; M, median leaf cells with chloroplasts
(dotted lines), oil bodies disintegrated; N, c/s of apical part of male stem; 0, c/s of basal part of male stem; P, c/s of apical part of female
stem; Q-S, bracts; U, pseudoperianth from side; V, opened pseudoperianth. A-F, L-O, Q-V, H.F. Glen 3130\ G-K, P, H.F. Glen 3127.
Scale bars; A-K, U, V, 500 pm; L, 100 pm; M, T, 50 pm; N-P, Q-S, 250 pm. Artist: G. Condy.
164
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 6. — Fossombronia swaziensis. A, simple stem toward apex; B, apical leaves in close-up; C, leaf base showing cell layers; D, perigonial
bracts; E, pseudoperianth from side; F, pseudoperianth from above. A-C, E, F, H.F. Glen 3127\ D, H.F. Glen 3130. A, x 9; B, x 29; C, x
83; D, x 19; E, x 1 1 ; F, x 10.5.
wide in centre, mostly tapering to tips and ending in a
loop, 5 pm wide, sometimes not tapering, ends blunt, ±
12.5 pm wide, bispiral or centrally trispiral and then
bispiral toward ends.
Fossombronia swaziensis is known from the two type
collections growing on clayey soil on the banks of the
Umbuluzi River in a wattle forest at Forbes Reef Store
(Figure 4), Hhohho District, Swaziland, with vegetation
type North-Eastern Mountain Grassland (Low & Rebelo
1996), receiving >1000 mm rain annually. A third sporu-
lating specimen was recently collected on the banks of
Sterkspruit, De Kuilen, east of Lydenberg in Mpuma-
langa. The species can be recognised by its wide, round-
ed leaves, sometimes slightly indexed above, by quite
large perigonial bracts in male plants and by spores
which have one to several tubercular processes in the
complete or incomplete areolae. This ornamentation is
FIGURE 7. — Fossombronia swaziensis. Spores and elater A, B, distal face; C, side view of distal face; D, detail of areolae on distal face; E, prox-
imal face; F, elater. A, H.F. Glen 3127\ B-F, H.F. Glen 3130. A, x 715; B, x 795; C, x 780; D, x 1400; E, x 811; F, x 681.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
165
somewhat similar to that seen in F. straussiana (Perold
1997a), but there the rhizoids are hyaline, not purple as
in F. swaziensis. The latter is also a larger plant, with ±
entire, nonconvoluted leaves and discrete perigonial
bracts subtending the antheridia. F. swaziensis may be far
more common than the only two sporulating specimens
from Forbes Reef and the single one from De Kuilen
suggest, but all the other collections lack spores which
are needed to confirm the determinations. This new
species is also rather similar in general appearance to
robust forms of F. crispa which, however, has reticulate
spore ornamentation with the areolae lacking inclusions
(Perold 1997c). The multistratose leaf bases in F.
swaziensis may be due to the growing conditions, as
Scott & Pike (1988) surmised the case to be in F. crassi-
fola Spruce, where this also occurs.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
Held at PRE. Bracketed numbers after citation of collectors’ names
and collecting numbers refer to the species described in the text in
alphabetical order, namely: F. angulifolia (1) and F. swaziensis (2).
Glen 3127 (2) (paratype), 3130 (2) (holotype).
Perold & Koekemoer 3711 (1) (holotype), 3712a (1) (paratype), 4064
(2).
NEW RECORDS OF FOSSOMBRON1A SPECIES IN LESOTHO
(HELD AT PRE)
F gemmifera Perold (Perold 1997a: 19). LESOTHO, 2927: (-BC),
Perold & Koekemoer 3733.
F. glenii Perold (Perold 1997a: 20). LESOTHO, 2828: (-CC), Perold &
Koekemoer 3737, 3739. 2927: (-BA), Perold & Koekemoer 3736.
2927: (- BC), Perold & Koekemoer 3713, 3719.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I sincerely thank Dr E.O. Campbell for refereeing this
article and for her helpful suggestions; Ms M.
Koekemoer, curator of the National Herbarium, Pretoria,
for her help with fieldwork in Lesotho and Mpumalanga
as well as Dr H.F. Glen for collecting the specimens of F.
swaziensis, for suggesting the specific epithet and for
translating the diagnoses into Latin. I also extend my
gratitude to Ms G. Condy for the drawings, Mrs A.
Romanowski for developing and printing the pho-
tographs and to Ms D. Maree for typing the manuscript.
REFERENCES
LOW, A.B. & REBELO, A. 1996. Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho
and Swaziland. Dept. Environmental Affairs & Tourism,
Pretoria.
PEROLD, S.M. 1997a. Studies in the liverwort genus Fossombronia
(Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 1 Three new species from
Northern Province, Gauteng and Mpumalanga. Bothalia 27:
17-27.
PEROLD, S.M. 1997b. Studies in the liverwort genus Fossombronia
(Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 3. An amendment to F.
spinifolia. Bothalia 27: 39-42.
PEROLD, S.M. 1997c. Studies in the liverwort genus Fossombronia
(Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 4. A re-examination of F.
crispa, F. leucoxantha and F. tumida. Bothalia 27: 105-115.
Scott, G A M. & PIKE, D C. 1988. Revisionary notes on Fos-
sombronia. The Bryologist 9: 193-201.
Bothalia 28,2: 167-177 (1998)
The genus Echium (Boraginaceae) in southern Africa
E. RETIEF * and A.E. VAN WYK**
Keywords: Boraginaceae, Echium L., indumentum, Lobostemon Lehm., phytogeography, pollen, relationships, southern Africa, taxonomy, weed
ABSTRACT
The genus Echium L. (Boraginaceae) comprises about 60 species, mainly from Macaronesia Europe, western Asia and
North Africa. Two species E. plantagineum L. and E. vulgare L. were introduced into southern Africa and have become
naturalised. The species occur mainly as roadside weeds in the region. Echium is closely related to Lobostemon Lehm. (inch
Echiostachys Levyns), endemic in the southwestern Cape region. Pollen morphology shows a remarkable similarity
between these genera, even suggesting that they could be merged. However, other characters, such as bilobed styles
(Echium) versus undivided ones (Lobostemon) and the presence of an annulus, composed of a minute collar or 5-10 minute
hairy lobules, at the bottom of the corolla tube inside (Echium), in contrast to hairs and/or scales at the base of the filaments
(Lobostemon) contradict the pollen structure, and Echium and Lobostemon are therefore regarded as two separate genera.
Significant taxonomic characters, an identification key, full descriptions, illustrations and distribution maps of E. plan-
tagineum and E. vulgare are given.
CONTENTS
Abstract 167
Introduction 167
Materials and methods 167
Historical outline 167
Morphological characters of taxonomic significance . 168
Trichomes 168
Corolla 168
Pollen 170
Style 170
Fruit 171
Phytogeography 171
Key to species 173
Echium L 173
1 . Echium plantagineum L 173
2. Echium vulgare L 174
Specimens examined 174
Acknowledgements 176
References 176
INTRODUCTION
The genus Echium L. (1753) comprises about 60
species, distributed in Macaronesia, Europe, western
Asia and North Africa (Mabberley 1997). It belongs to
the Boraginaceae, a family characterised by an indumen-
tum mainly of trichomes with swollen, multicellular
bases, inflorescences of scorpioid or helicoid cymes
which uncoil and elongate as the flowers mature, a ter-
minal or gynobasic style, and fruit consisting mostly of
four nutlets. Although cosmopolitan, the members of
Boraginaceae are particularly well represented in tem-
perate and subtropical regions, with centres of diversity
in the Mediterranean region and western North America
(Zomlefer 1994).
Two species of Echium, E. plantagineum L. and E.
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria.
** H.G.WJ. Schweickerdt Herbarium, Department of Botany,
University of Pretoria, 0002 Pretoria.
MS. received: 1998-03-23
vulgare L., were introduced into southern Africa and are
now naturalised in the Western and Eastern Cape, eastern
Free State, Lesotho, high mountainous areas of KwaZulu-
Natal and in Mpumalanga. Both species occur mainly as
roadside weeds in the region. This study forms part of an
ongoing revision of the Boraginaceae of southern Africa
which is currently in progress.
The purpose of this paper is to present a revision of
two species of Echium in South Africa and Lesotho.
Diagnostic characters, an identification key, full descrip-
tions, illustrations and distribution maps are provided.
The generic description of Echium and also the species
descriptions of E. plantagineum and E. vulgare are based
on behaviour in southern Africa only.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Herbarium specimens in BM, BOL, E, GRA, K,
NBG, NH, NU, PRE, PRU and SAM were studied to
gather data on morphological characters, flowering time
and distribution. Both untreated and acetolysed pollen
grains were studied. Pollen was acetolysed according to
the standard method of Erdtman (1960). For SEM, sam-
ples were coated with gold and studied with an ISI-SX-
25 microscope. For LM, pollen grains were mounted in
glycerine jelly.
HISTORICAL OUTLINE
According to Smith (1966), E. plantagineum was
introduced to South Africa from Europe as part of stock
feed. A note on Britten 520 , a herbarium specimen in
PRE dated 1917, E. plantagineum might have become
established in the region after mixed birdseed had been
sown. Wright (1904) records a specimen of Villet (with-
out locality) which may have been collected about
1825-1827. Exactly how and when E. vulgare entered
the country is not known. The oldest specimens exam-
ined date back from 1912 to 1915 when Mary Page, a
botanical artist, collected this species in Lesotho.
168
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
Lehmann (1818), like Linnaeus (1762, 1771), Thun-
berg (1794), Jacquin (1797) and others, published new
species under Echium from the Cape region. In 1830,
however, the genus Lobostemon (Boraginaceae) was
described by Lehmann, based on a plant grown in the
Botanic Gardens at Hamburg, specimens of it then
named by him L. echioides. Lehmann emphasised the
presence of a scale-like outgrowth at the base of the sta-
mens as diagnostic in Lobostemon (Levyns 1934). Buek
(1837) transferred 32 South African species to Lobo-
stemon, most of which had formerly been included in
Echium. He extended Lehmann’s genus to include cer-
tain species in which staminal scales were absent, but in
which hairs were present on the lower parts of the fila-
ments. De Candolle (1846) also recognised the genus
Lobostemon. He described some new species, but refer-
red all those without definite scales to the genus Echium.
In Flora capensis , Wright (1904) reverted to Buek’s ear-
lier concept of Lobostemon in that he once more returned
those taxa without scales to the genus. However, he
retained one species, Echium formosum Pers. in the
genus Echium. Today E. formosum is treated as conspe-
cific with Lobostemon regulareflorus (Ker Gawl.)
M.H.Buys (Buys & Van der Walt 1994).
Johnston (1924) was of the opinion that Lobostemon
should be a synonym of Echium. He published new com-
binations in Echium for 21 species of Lobostemon ,
described by Buek (1837), De Candolle (1846) and
Wright (1904). Some years later, Johnston (1953, 1954)
once again separated Lobostemon from Echium on the
position of the annulus and the fact that in Echium the
style is always 2-lobed, whereas in Lobostemon it is sim-
ple. His account on Echium and Lobostemon, published
in 1954, appeared after Levyns’s (1934) major revision of
Lobostemon. In the latter publication Levyns described
the new genus, Echiostachys, based on three species, all
formerly placed under Echium. Johnston (1954), howev-
er, rejected the erection of the genus Echiostachys.
According to him, this proposed segregate genus differs
from the remaining Lobostemon species only in their
herbaceous habit and the very dense cylindrical thyrse,
differences which are no more striking or important than
those existing between groups of species in Echium.
Both Phillips (1951) and Dyer (1975) distinguished
Echium and Echiostachys from Lobostemon, the first two
genera with the filaments sometimes hairy at the base,
but never with scales or protuberances at the base.
Lobostemon is retained for those taxa that have filaments
with a densely hairy scale, ridge or protuberance at the
base. Echium, on the other hand, is separated from
Echiostachys because of its irregular, bilabiate corolla.
Dyer (1975) was definitely not aware of Johnston’s
(1953) account on Echium and Lobostemon, where he
separated the genera based on the position of an annulus
inside the corolla tube.
The present authors follow Johnston (1953) and others
in regarding Echium and Lobostemon as two separate
genera. Although very similar in pollen morphology,
other characters like the structure of the style and a dis-
junct distribution pattern reveal two distinct genera. For
the purpose of the present paper, Echiostachys is regard-
ed as synonymous with Lobostemon, in agreement with
Johnston’s view above.
MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERS OF TAXONOMIC
SIGNIFICANCE
Trichomes
The indumentum of the stem, leaf and calyx in
Echium can be described as hispid or strigose. Three
morphologically different types of trichomes have hither-
to been reported in the genus: (1) tubercle-based tri-
chomes (setae), often with a concentric ring of epidermal
cells surrounding the base, (2) unicellular trichomes, and
(3) glandular, multicellular trichomes. These trichome
types are simple (unbranched). Glandular trichomes, how-
ever, do not occur on the various plant parts of E. plan-
tagineum and E. vulgare.
The trichome complement of E. plantagineum con-
sists of tubercle-based setae, each with a uniseriate, con-
centric ring of epidermal cells surrounding the base.
These setae vary from long and slender to short, and are
often stout and sparsely to moderately densely arranged
(Figure 1A-C). Furthermore, a sublayer of much shorter,
soft, unicellular trichomes is present on the stems, mar-
gins and veins of the leaves, as well as the calyx lobes
(Figure IB). E. vulgare is characterised by tubercle-
based seta with a ring of cells at the base, similar to that
of E. plantagineum, interspersed with tubercle-based
setae, which are short and stout, without a ring of cells at
the base (Figure ID, E). Although the base of shorter
setae are usually swollen, there is generally little or no
modification of the surrounding epidermal cells (Figure
IE). The setae with a ring of cells occur very sparsely,
whereas the shorter ones without prominent rings form a
moderately dense sublayer (Figure ID, E). The combina-
tion of trichome types is distinctly different in the two
southern African species, and a most useful character for
identifying specimens.
If the collective trichome cover of E. plantagineum
and E. vulgare is compared with those of Lobostemon
species, to which they are closely related, similar but not
exactly the same states are found. The nature, composi-
tion and relative abundance of trichomes are also of tax-
onomic importance in other genera of the Boraginaceae.
An overview of trichome characters in all southern
African taxa of the family is in preparation.
Corolla
Flowers of Echium are borne in thyrsoid inflores-
cences composed of many lateral helicoid cymes, the lat-
ter enlarging in fruit. The shape and colour of the corol-
la, together with the degree of stamen exsertion, are flo-
ral characters of prime taxonomic importance in the
European species of Echium (Gibbs 1971). E. plan-
tagineum and E. vulgare belong to two different groups.
The corolla of E. plantagineum is broadly funnel-shaped
with two stamens long-exserted (Figure 2). E. vulgare
has a broadly funnel-shaped corolla with four stamens
long-exserted. The stamen number can be used to distin-
guish between flowering material of the species con-
cerned. In a key to Echium species, Gibbs (1972) distin-
guished two main groups, namely species with the flow-
ers flesh-coloured or yellowish or bluish white, and those
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
169
FIGURE 1. — Echium leaf surface. E. plantagineum : A, upper surface; B, lower surface; C, trichomes. E. vulgare: D, upper surface; E, lower sur-
face; F, trichomes. A-C, Hilliard & Burtt 6999\ D-F, Sidey 3977. A, x 8; B, x 7; C, x 21.5; D, x 22; E, x 15; F, x 57.
with flowers blue, reddish purple or pink-carmine turn-
ing blue-purple. E. plantagineum and E. vulgare belong
to the second group. The corolla in E. vulgare is pilose
(Figure 3A), whereas that of E. plantagineum is
glabrous, except for sparse, simple, long, unicellular tri-
chomes on veins and margins. The corolla indumentum
of E. vulgare is also characterised by simple, long, uni-
cellular trichomes on the veins and margin, but with sim-
ilar, shorter trichomes in the intercostal areas of the
corolla (Figure 3A, B).
Corollas in the family Boraginaceae are actinomor-
phic, rarely zygomorphic. In Echium and to a lesser
extent Lobostemon, however, irregular corollas occur.
Johnston (1924) was of the opinion that the development
of zygomorphy furnishes no substantial basis for the
recognition of the tribe Echieae in which Echium and
Lobostemon are placed. He pointed out that between the
conspicuously irregular corollas of certain species of
Echium and the regular corollas of typical species of
Lithospermum there is every intermediate stage of irre-
gularity. According to Johnston (1924), Echium italicum
has regular and subregular corollas, and in a number of
the echiums of the section Lobostemon, the corolla is
also regular or practically so. The corolla of both E. plan-
tagineum and E. vulgare is zygomorphic. On the other
hand, evidence from palynology supports the retention of
the tribe Echieae (see pollen).
Johnston (1924) regarded Lobostemon as a synonym
of Echium , but later changed his opinion. In a key to the
genera of the Lithospermeae, Johnston (1953) separated
the two genera on the basis of the position of what is
called an ‘annulus’. In the case of Echium, the annulus,
borne 1 mm or less above the base of the corolla tube, is
composed of a minute collar or ring of 5-10 minute hairy
lobules (Figure 3C). Lobostemon is characterised by the
presence of an annulus above the corolla base. It is com-
posed of five distinct, densely villous swellings or five
squamose appendages borne below the attachment of
each stamen. The two naturalised Echium species can
therefore not be confused with any member of Lobo-
stemon in southern Africa.
In some species of Echium and also Lobostemon , the
margin of the theca of the opened anthers is ± ciliate with
FIGURE 2. — Inflorescence of Echium plantagineum, Stirton 8218
(PRE). Scale bar: 10 mm.
170
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 3. — A-C, corolla. E. vulgare: A, outer surface; B, simple, unicellular trichome; C, hairy lobule. D-F, pollen. D, E. vulgare, pollen grain.
E, F, E. plantagineum ; E, granular colpus; F, tectum with supratectal gemmae. G-I, style of E. vulgare: G, stigmas; H, papillae caps; I, tri-
chomes on style. A-C, I, Sidey 3977 ; D, G, H, Hilliard & Burtt 18686 ; E, Bayer 6005 ; F, Balsinhas 3546. A, x 35; B, x 155; C, x 68; D,
x 2199; E, x 4058; F, x 7546; G, x 91; H, x 1067; I, x 84.
very slender elongate incurving hairs (Johnston 1953).
According to Johnston (1953) similar slender hairs may
also arise from along the midline of the open, empty
theca. These characters are not uncommon, although
they are usually best developed in specimens of E. plan-
tagineum and its allies.
Pollen
Pollen grains heteropolar, with one pole ‘/3 to ‘A wider
than the other, broad end obtuse, narrow end more acute
in equatorial view, the long sides concave, tricolporate,
pear-shaped, P = (2 1 — )27— 29(— 37) pm, E (at widest point)
= (14-)22-25(-29) pm. Shape in polar view with broad
end rounded-triangular, narrow end more deeply 3-lobed;
in equatorial view ovate to ovate-triangular, with protrud-
ing ora (Figure 3D). Colpi narrow, elongated, extending
over about 4A the length of polar axis with more or less
rounded to pointed ends, somewhat sunken, always free
at ends, surface with gemmae (Figure 3E). Endo-aper-
tures (ora) situated closer to the broader pole, more or less
circular, aperture membrane covered with gemmae.
Tectum microreticulate with densely spaced lumina of
different shape and size. Supratectal gemmae confined to
margins of lumina (Figure 3F).
Pollen morphology is remarkably similar in the var-
ious species of Echium (Reille 1995). Pollen of Echium
in southern Africa is not sufficiently different from that
of Lobostemon. In equatorial view, grains are triangular
to somewhat pear-shaped in outline (Figure 3D), similar
to grains of Lobostemon. Two shape classes, namely sub-
spheroidal and prolate, were distinguished in the tribe
Echieae (Retief & Van Wyk 1997). Grains of E. plan-
tagineum as- well as E. vulgare are subprolate.
Palynological evidence indicates a very close rela-
tionship between Echium and Lobostemon , even suggest-
ing that they might be congeneric. Both genera have tri-
colporate, anisopolar grains. We follow Johnston (1953)
and treat Echium and Lobostemon as two separate,
although closely related, genera. A comparison of the
pollen of Echium , Lobostemon and Lithospermum , (type
genus of Lithospermae) strongly supports the retention
of the tribe Echieae (Retief & Van Wyk 1997).
Style
The gynobasic style in Echium is almost always
bilobed in the upper part with two capitate stigmas
(Figure 3G). These stigmas are covered with papillae,
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
171
which end in prominent contiguous caps with crenulate
margins (Figure 3H). The surface of the papillae caps is
covered with cuticular irregularities (Figure 3H).
According to Heslop-Harrison (1981), pollen grains of
compatible size are wedged between the papillae by
bees, whilst grains resting on the surface of the cap do
not hydrate or germinate; the papillae caps thus function
as a series of juxtaposed parasols. The styles of all
Echium species are pubescent (Al-Shebaz 1991). Only
simple, unicellular trichomes are present (Figure 31).
The two Echium species in southern Africa differ
from all Lobostemon species in having styles prominent-
ly bilobed, unlike those of species of Lobostemon which
are undivided. Those species of Echium with cleft styles
show similarity to members of Ehretia and Cordia also
with divided styles. Echium, however, differs from
Cordia in which twice bifid styles occur with linear or
clavate stigmatic branches — not a bilobed style with cap-
itate stigmas. The style of Echium is similar to that of
Ehretia , both with bilobed styles and capitate stigmas.
The family Boraginaceae is sometimes split into two sep-
arate families, namely Boraginaceae s.str. and Ehreti-
aceae. Ehretiaceae includes both Ehretia and Cordia.
Echium, a member of the tribe Boragineae (Boragi-
nioideae) has style and stigma characteristics similar to
those of members of the Ehretiaceae and this supports
the view that the family Boraginaceae is a natural entity
and should not be divided into two or even more segre-
gate families. Stigmas in other genera of the Boragineae
are conic, discoid, subglobose, obtuse, entire or 2-lobed,
thus differing in morphology from those of Echium.
Fruit
The fruit in Echium consists of four nutlets which are
ovoid, ovoid-trigonal, oblong-bipyramidal or subglobose
(Edmondson 1978). A broad attachment scar and an erect
or incurved beak are also present. The outer surface of the
nutlet can be smooth or variously rugose, tuberculate,
scrobiculate or reticulate. E. plantagineum and E. vulgare
differ very little in the structure of their nutlets. Both have
ovoid-trigonal nutlets with rugose, tuberculate outer sur-
faces with the tubercles varying in size (Figure 4A-F).
Many taxonomic decisions in the Boraginaceae are
based on fruit characters. Fruit in Wellstedia (capsule),
Ehretia (drupaceous) and Cordia (drupe) differ markedly
from those of other genera in the family characterised by
nutlets. The outer surface of the nutlets varies considerably
in sculpture and vesture. The nutlets of E. plantagineum
and E. vulgare show similarities to those of Lobostemon ,
Anchusa and Heliotropium. Species of Myosotis have
smooth and shiny nutlets, whereas nutlets of species of
Cynoglossum are characterised by simple, barbed tri-
chomes. An overview of the different fruit types present in
the southern African Boraginaceae is in preparation.
PHYTOGEOGRAPHY
Echium is a genus concentrated in the Mediterranean
region. Its greatest morphological diversity is centred in
Macaronesia. According to Bramwell (1972), 22 species
are indigenous to the Canary Islands, three to the Cape
Verde Islands and two to Madeira. About 26 species are
native to northwestern Africa, the highest concentration
in Morocco, and about 15 in the Iberian Peninsula (Gibbs
1971). Several herbaceous species, like E. plantagineum
and E. vulgare, have been introduced by man to various
other parts of the world such as southern Africa and
Australia where they are now naturalised and widespread.
As pointed out above, Echium is very closely related
to the South African genus Lobostemon. Lobostemon,
FIGURE 4. — Echium nutlet A, E. plantagineum , dorsal face. B-F, E. vulgare : B, ventral face with prominent attachment scar; C, dorsal face;
D-F, outer surface with large and numerous small tubercles. A, Germishuizen 4102\ B-F, Zietsman 1480. A, x 13.5; B, C, x 16; D, x 23;
E, x 44.5; F, x 148.
172
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 5. — Echium plantagineum A, habit, x 0.8; B, flower, x 2; C, longitudinal section of corolla, x 1.5; D, style, x 22; E, nutlet, x 14, F, lower
surface of leaf, x 3. A-D, Acocks 9250\ E, Germishuizen 4102, F, Hilliard & Burn 6999.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
173
confined to the Cape Floristic Kingdom, and several
other taxa in the southern African flora, have a southern
Africa-North Africa, Mediterranean and Eurasian dis-
junct distribution pattern. For example, there are four
endemic genera of the Fumariaceae in southern Africa,
geographically widely separated from other members of
the family in the northern temperate parts of the Old
World (Hutchinson 1921). Another example is Campto-
loma (Scrophulariaceae) with three vacariant species that
form part of the disjunct Afro-arid element in African
phytogeography (Hilliard 1994). The genus has one
species in Namibia-Angola, another in the Canary
Islands and the third in a small area around the Horn of
Africa. The interpretation of disjunct distributions is
often complex and impossible to explain (Stott 1981). It
can, for example, be speculated that Echium and Lobo-
stemon are derived from a once widespread, common
ancestor which was a component of a temperate flora on
the African continent. Climatic changes took place and
Echium and Lobostemon remained as relicts, evolving
separately in a Mediterranean type climate, but now
absent in the vast dry parts of Africa. However, there is
no satisfactory paleobotanical evidence to verify the
above assumption. Long-distance dispersal may also
have played a role, but this type of explanation is usual-
ly considered highly unlikely for clarifying wide dis-
junctions on continental areas (Poynton 1983).
Echium L., Species plantarum: 139 (1753); L.:
175 (1754); Juss.: 130 (1789); DC.: 13 (1846); Benth.:
863 (1876); Giirke: 128 (1897); C.H.Wright: 43 (1904);
E. Phillips: 632 (1951); Riedl: 213 (1967); P.E.Gibbs: 97
(1972); R. A. Dyer: 513 (1975); J.R.Edm.: 318 (1978);
Toelken: 1 155 (1986); Al-Shebaz: 1 37 (1991); Verde.: 81
(1991). Type: E. italicum L. [lecto., see Al-Shebaz: 138
(1991)].
Isoplesion Rafin.: 86 (1836-38).
Megacaryon Boiss.: 203 (1879).
Annual, biennial or perennial herbs or shrubs; scabrid,
hispid or canescent. Leaves alternate, with basal leaves
rosulate, petiolate or sessile, densely hairy. Flowers in
helicoid cymes, grouped in many-branched thyrses or
panicles, elongating considerably in fruit, bracteate;
bracts small and foliaceous. Calyx deeply 5-lobed, some-
what accrescent. Corolla blue or purplish blue; zygo-
morphic; tube narrowly to broadly funnel-shaped,
straight, outside pubescent or glabrous, inside usually
with a ring of 5-10 distinct scales or lobes or an undu-
late, entire, somewhat fleshy collar-like membrane at
base; throat open, without any appendages; limb marked-
ly oblique; lobes equal or unequal, short, obtuse.
Stamens 5, variously exserted, inserted on corolla tube at
various levels; filaments linear, glabrous or with long
hairs; anthers versatile. Ovary 4-lobed, with a single
ovule in each locule; style gynobasic, linear, bifid at
apex, pubescent, long-exserted; stigmas 2, capitate. Fruit
of 4 nutlets; nutlets convex on one face, keeled on the
other, ± triangular at base, rugose, tuberculate.
A genus of about 60 species, mainly confined to
Madeira, the Azores and Canary Islands but also found in
Europe, western Asia and North Africa. Some herba-
ceous species have been introduced in various parts of
the world where they are now naturalised. Two species,
E. plantagineum and E. vulgare, are naturalised in south-
ern Africa; recorded from the Western and Eastern Cape,
Free State, Lesotho and Mpumalanga.
Key to species
Corolla glabrous, except for sparse simple unicellular trichomes
on veins and margin; two stamens long-exserted, three
enclosed; basal leaves petiolate, broadly ovate, with
prominent lateral veins; indumentum of sparse, simple,
long, slender tubercle-based setae with a sublayer of
much shorter, fine, simple, unicellular trichomes on leaf
margins and especially on midrib of lower leaf surface
1 E. plantagineum
Corolla softly hairy, with simple, unicellular trichomes promi-
nently longer on veins; four stamens long-exserted, one
enclosed; basal leaves subsessile, linear-lanceolate or
narrowly oblong with lateral veins obscure; indumen-
tum of sparse, simple, long tubercle-based setae with a
sublayer of much shorter tubercle-based setae, simple as
well as unicellular trichomes on midrib of lower leaf
surface 2. E. vulgare
1. Echium plantagineum L., Mantissa plantarum
altera: 202 (1771); C.H.Wright: 44 (1904); P.E.Gibbs: 57
(1971); Bramwell: 64 (1972); P.E.Gibbs: 99 (1972);
Piggin: 217 (1977); J.R.Edm.: 322 (1978); Toelken: 1 156
(1986); Verde.: 81 (1991). Type: Barrelier, Plantae per
Galliam, Hispaniam et Italiam observatae, iconibus
exhibitae 145, 1. 1 026 (1714), see Verde.: 83 (1991).
E. lycupsis auct. non L.
E. violaceum auct. non L. (1767).
Annual or biennial herb with 1-many flowering
stems, up to 0.8 m high. Indumentum of soft, appressed,
long (up to 3 mm) tubercle-based setae, each trichome
with a concentric ring of cells at base, sometimes stems,
leaf margins and veins on lower surface of leaf with a
sublayer of soft, much shorter, simple, unicellular tri-
chomes. Stems erect or decumbent. Basal leaves ovate to
oblanceolate, 50-300 x 10-70 mm, with prominent lat-
eral veins on both surfaces; lamina narrowing rather
abruptly into petiole; petiole up to 55 mm long. Cauline
leaves oblong to lanceolate, uppermost ± cordate at base.
Cymes usually distinctly stalked, lengthening after flow-
ering to 250-300 mm. Calyx up to 12 mm long in fruit.
Corolla blue or deep purplish blue, broadly funnel-
shaped, 10-20 mm long, glabrous except for sparse hairs
on veins and margins of outside surface, with a ring of 10
distinct pilose lobes within tube. Stamens : lower pair
long-exserted, the others included or only slightly exsert-
ed; filaments with long hairs. Nutlets greyish brown, tri-
quetrous, rugose, tuberculate with tubercles varying in
size, 2. 0-3.0 x 2. 0-2. 5 mm. Chromosome number : n = 8
(Britton 1951). Figure 5.
Distinguishing characters'. E. plantagineum differs from
some Echium species in the colour of the corolla. E.
italicum L. and E. boissieri Steud., for instance, have
yellowish or bluish white or flesh-coloured corollas,
whereas E. plantagineum has blue or purplish blue flow-
ers. The subglabrous corolla with hairs on veins and mar-
gins only, and basal leaves usually broadly ovate to
174
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
oblanceolate with prominent lateral veins distinguish E.
plantagineum from E. vulgare and a number of other
species, including E. albicans Lag. & Rodr., E. creticum
L. and E. tuberculatum Hoffmanns. & Link. E. vulgare
has a corolla with long, simple, unicellular trichomes on
the veins and margins and smaller ones on the corolla
itself. The basal leaves of E. vulgare are linear-lanceolate
to narrowly oblanceolate, attenuating into a short petiole.
Distribution: E. plantagineum is native to western
Europe including southwestern Britain and the
Mediterranean area. It has been introduced into other
parts of Europe, southern Russia and the Caucasus; it is
a widely distributed, troublesome weed in Australia
(Verdcourt 1991). In southern Africa this introduced
species occurs from the Western Cape, extending more
or less along the coast, to the Eastern Cape. It is also
found in the temperate mountainous areas of the Free
State, Lesotho and KwaZulu-Natal, with a few records
from southern Mpumalanga (Figure 6).
Habitat: although E. plantagineum is most noticeable
along roadsides, it also occurs in waste ground and as a
weed of cultivation. It has also been recorded from rocky
slopes in grassland.
Flowering time: September to March.
Common names: bloudissel (doring), Paterson’s curse,
salvation Jane and purple bugloss.
Illustrations: Jacq.: t 45 (1771); Butcher: t. 995 (1961); Verde.: 82
(1991).
2. Echium vulgare L., Species plantarum 139
(1753); P.E. Gibbs: 54 (1971); P.E.Gibbs: 99 (1972);
Piggin: 224 (1977); J.R.Edm.: 322 (1978); Toelken: 1156
(1986). Type: LINN 191.19.
For synonymy see Gibbs (1971 ).
Biennial, or sometimes annual herb, up to 1 m high.
Indumentum of sparse, stout, appressed to patent hairs
with a multicellular base and a dense sublayer of much
shorter hairs with base not so prominently multicellular.
FIGURE 6. — Distribution of Echium plantagineum.
Stem simple or with many decumbent, flowering stems;
usually branched if grazed or damaged. Basal leaves lin-
ear-lanceolate to narrowly oblanceolate, 50-260 x 10-30
mm, attenuating into a short petiole (subsessile), lateral
veins not prominent. Cauline leaves narrowly lanceolate,
sessile. Calyx lobes 6-8 mm long in fruit. Corolla bril-
liant blue, fading to mauve, broadly funnel-shaped,
10-15 mm long, puberulous and with sparse long, simple
trichomes on veins and margins outside. Stamens: four
long-exserted, one short-enclosed. Nutlets brownish
grey, tuberculate with large and numerous small tuber-
cles, triquetrous, with prominent dorsal and ventral
keels, beak narrow, acute. Chromosome number: n = 16
(Britton 1951). Figure 7.
Echium vulgare is a very variable species in other
parts of the world. The synonymy of Gibbs (1971) fol-
lows a rather broad species concept in his revision of the
Spanish members of the genus.
Distinguishing characters: E. vulgare can be distin-
guished from other Echium species by its prominently
exserted stamens, in contrast to, for example, E. parvi-
florum Moench and E. arenarium Guss., which have all
the stamens included in the corolla. It differs, like E.
plantagineum , from another group of Echium species in
having a blue corolla and not one which is flesh-
coloured, yellowish white or bluish white. Some Echium
species, like E. italicum L., have a narrowly funnel-
shaped corolla with the tube not markedly widening
towards the apex. E. vulgare, however, belongs to those
taxa with a broadly funnel-shaped corolla in which the
tube widens markedly towards the apex.
Distribution: E. vulgare, native to Europe, has been
introduced to various countries worldwide, often becom-
ing a weed. In southern Africa the species is found in
Mpumalanga, Free State, Lesotho and the Eastern Cape
(Figure 8).
Habitat: E. vulgare is a weed of old cultivated lands,
waste places and roadsides, but occasionally also occurs
in montane grassland.
Flowering time: November to March.
Common names: blue devil, blue weed, viper’s bugloss.
Illustrations: Lam.: t. 94 (1791); Butcher: t 994 (1961).
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
Specimens held at PRE, unless otherwise indicated.
The numbers in brackets signify the identity of the spec-
imens: (OF. plantagineum , (2) E. vulgare.
Acocks 9250 ( 1 ) K, PRE; 16282 (2) K.
Balsinhas 3546 (1). Barnes 94 (1). Bayer 6005 (1) Bayliss 73 (1)
GRA, K, PRE; 1133, 6132 (1); 24276 (1) NBG. Bester 710 , 955 (1)
NH. Bolus 4989 (1) BOL, K. Bos 259 (1) NBG. Boucher 3941 (1);
3395 (1) NBG. Boucher & Ahmed 7/5(1). Brink 239 ( 1) GRA, K, PRE,
NBG; 265 (2) GRA, K, PRE. Britten 520 (1); 2969 (1) GRA. Brown
sub PRE41060 (1). Brusse 5601 (2). Burgoyne 971 (1). Burrows 2198
(1).
Case sub PRE654738 ( 1 ). Chelchinsky 16 (2) GRA. Codd & Dyer 6233
(2) K. Coleman 524 ( 1) NH, PRE. Comins 1899 (1) GRA, PRE.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
175
FIGURE 1 .—Echium vulgare. A, lower part of plant, x 0.8; B, inflorescence, x 0.5; C, flower, x 2; D, longitudinal section of corolla, x 1.5; E,
style, x 20 ; F, nutlet, x 15; G, lower surface of leaf, x 3. A, B, Codd & Dyer 623 3\ C-E, Van Wyk 5268', F, Zietsman 1480', G, Sidey 3977.
176
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
Dahlstrand 541, 3094 ( 1 ) GRA. Davidse 6721 (1). Davies s.n. ( 1 ) GRA.
De Vries 9 (1) GRA. Dieterlen 1030 (2) PRE, SAM. Dold 1987, 2026
(2) GRA. Drege 442 (1) GRA. Dreyer 14 (2). Drijfhout 4137 (1) NBG,
PRE.
Edwards, Cadman & Norris 3163 (2) BOL, NU, PRE. Engelbrecht
JE650 (2) J.
Eourcade 1886(1) BOL, K, NBG; 5S25(1) NBG. Fugler 100(1) K,
PRE
Gafney sub PRE10201 (2). Galpin 121 ( 1 ) K, NBG; 212(1) PRE; 4351
(1) GRA, PRE; 7939 (1). Garrett 60 (2) E, NU. Garside 147(1) K.
Germishuizen 4102 ( 1 ). Giffen 7/5(1); 809 ( 1 ) GRA, PRE. Greef 2(1).
Guthrie 3114 (1) NBG.
Hilger 44(1). Hilliard & Burn 6999 (1) NU, PRE; 18686 (2) E, K, NU,
PRE. H Hilary sub NH 37460 ( 1 ) NH. Hoare 31 (1) GRA. Hoener 1705
( 1 ). Hutton s.n. ( 1 ) GRA.
Jacobs?. 311 (2) PRE; 2082 (2) NBG, PRE. Jacot Guillarmod 3211 (2);
7341 ( 1 ) GRA; 9837 ( 1 ) GRA, PRE. Joffe 873 ( 1 ) NBG, PRE. Jordaan
1 (1).
Kerfoot 6216 ( 1 ). Killick & Marais 2107 ( 1 ) K, NU, PRE.
Leendertz 8184 ( 1 ). Loubser 3867 ( 1 ). Low 754 ( 1 ) NBG.
MacCabe 3149 (2). Marais 567 ( 1 ) GRA, NBG, PRE; 807 ( 1 ) GRA, K,
PRE. Maree 12 (1) Mar loth 7201 (1) PRE; 10864 (1) NBG, PRE.
Marsh 75 (2) K, NH, PRE. Mauve & Tblken 4520 (2) K, PRE. Moll
2663 (1) K, NU.
Nel 77/9(1) GRA.
Page sub BOL16500 (2). Parker 4376 (1) BOL, K, NBG. Pegler 2138
(1) BOL, PRE. Phelan 200 ( 1) NU. Pienaar & Kok 1225 (1) PRE,
PRU. Pretorius 3(1) NBG.
Relief 373 (I). Rogers 26933, sub TRV3007 (1).
Saaiman 615 (2). Scharf 1763 (1) NBG, PRE. Schlieben 7607 (1) K.
Schlieben & Ellis 12331 (1) K, PRE. Schonland 3631 (1) GRA, K.
Sidey 3848 ( 1 ); 3977 (2) K, NH, PRE. Steyn 27(1). Stirton 8151, 8218,
8389 ( 1 ). Story 2084 (2) GRA, PRE. Strever 721 (2). Strey 7882 ( 1 ) K,
NH, NU, PRE.
Taylor 5485, 5784, 5978 (1) NBG. Tenant sub PRE14149 (2). Theron
708 (2) K, PRE; 2189 (2) Thode 62716 ( 1 ) K, PRE; sub PRE19418 ( 1 ).
Turner 267 (1).
Van Breda 12 (1) Van Rensburg 1957 (1) K. Van Wyk 5268 (2) PRE,
PRU; 5279 (I) PRE, PRU; 12059 ( 1) PRU. Van Wyk & Abbott 12059
(2) . Venter 7244 (2).
Ward 303 ( 1 ) NH Welman 780 (2) GRA, PRE. West 1514 ( 1 ). Williams
296, 3155 (1) K Wolley Dod 1893 (1) K, PRE. Wurtz 464 ( 1 ) NBG.
Zietsman 1480 (2).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The assistance of the artist, Ms G. Condy, the photog-
rapher, Mrs A. Romanowski and Mrs E. du Plessis of the
National Botanical Institute in preparing the manuscript,
is gratefully acknowledged. The directors, curators and
staff of the cited herbaria are thanked for allowing the
authors to study their material and for sending specimens
on loan.
REFERENCES
AL-SHEBAZ, I. A. 1991. The genera of the Boraginaceae in the south-
eastern United States. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum, supple-
mentary series 1: 1-169.
BENTHAM, G. 1876. Echium. In G. Bentham & J.D. Hooker, Genera
plantarum 2. Reeve, London.
BOISSIER, PE. 1879. Flora orientalis. Georg, Basel.
BRAMWELL, D. 1972. A revision of the genus Echium in Macaro-
nesia. Lagascalia 2: 37-115.
BRITTON, D M. 1951. Cytogenetic studies on the Boraginaceae.
Brittonia 7: 233-266.
BUEK, H.W. 1837. Echia capensia. Linnaea 11: 129-149.
BUTCHER, R.W. 1961. A new illustrated British Flora. Leonard Hill,
London.
BUYS, M.H. & VAN DER WALT, J.J.A. 1994. Lobostemon regulare-
florus — the correct name for L. grandiflorus . Bothalia 24: 1 70.
DE CANDOLLE, A. 1846. Echium. Prodromus 10: 13-26. Fortin, Mas-
son, Paris.
DYER, R.A. 1975. The genera of southern African flowering plants
Vol. I Department of Agricultural Technical Services, Pretoria.
EDMONDSON, J.R. 1978. Echium. In PH. Davis, Flora of Turkey 6:
318-324. University Press, Edinburgh.
ERDTMAN, G. 1960. The acetolysis method, a revised description.
Svensk botanisk tidskrift 54: 561-564.
GIBBS, PE 1971. Taxonomic studies on the genus Echium. I. An out-
line revision of the Spanish species. Lagascalia 1 : 27-82.
GIBBS, PE. 1972. Echium. Flora europaea 3: 97-100.
GURKE, M. 1897. Boraginaceae. In A. Engler & K. Prantl. Die Natiir-
lichen Pflanzenfamilien IV. 83a: 128-130.
HESLOP-HARRISON, Y. 1981. Stigmatic characteristics and angio-
sperm taxonomy. Nordic Journal of Botany 1: 401-420.
HILLIARD, O.M 1994. The Manuleae. Edinburgh University Press,
Edinburgh.
HUTCHINSON, J. 1921. The genera of Fumariaceae and their distrib-
ution. Kew Bulletin 1921: 97-115.
JACQUIN, N.J. 1771 Hortus botanicus vindobonensis. Kaliwoda, Vienna.
JACQUIN, N.J. 1797. Echium fruticosum. Plantarum rariorum horti
caesarei schoenbrunnensis I : t. 34. Wappler, Vienna.
JOHNSTON, I.M. 1924. Studies in the Boraginaceae 3 — the Old World
genera of the Boraginoideae. Contributions of the Gray Herba-
rium. Harvard 73: 42-78.
JOHNSTON, I.M. 1953. Studies in the Boraginaceae, 25. A revaluation
of some genera of the Lithospermeae. Journal of the Arnold
Arboretum 34: 258-299.
JOHNSTON, I.M 1954. Studies in the Boraginaceae, 27 Some gener-
al observations concerning the Lithospermeae. Journal of the
Arnold Arboretum 35: 158-166.
JUSSIEU, A. L. 1789. Genera plantarum. Herissant, Paris.
LAMARCK, J.B.A.P. DE M. 1791. Tableau encyclopedique et me-
thodique, tome 1, volume 1, part 1 . Paris.
LEHMANN, J.G.C. 1818. Plantae e familiae Asperifoliarum nucifer-
ae. Diimmler, Berlin.
LEHMANN, J.G.C. 1830. Plantas quasdam novas in horto hambur-
gensium botanico cultas. Linnaea 5: 371-387.
LEVYNS, MR 1934. A revision of Lobostemon Lehm. Journal of the
Linnean Society (Bot.) 49: 155—450.
LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum, edn 1. Laurentius Salvius,
Stockholm.
LINNAEUS, C 1754. Genera plantarum, edn 5. Laurentius Salvius,
Stockholm.
LINNAEUS, C. 1762. Species plantarum, edn 2. Laurentius Salvius,
Stockholm.
LINNAEUS, C. 1767. Mantissa plantarum 1. Laurentius Salvius,
Stockholm.
LINNAEUS, C. 1771. Mantissa plantarum altera. Laurentius Salvius,
Stockholm.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
177
MABBERLEY, D.J. 1997. The plant-book , edn 2. Cambridge Univer-
sity Press, Cambridge.
PHILLIPS, E.P 1951. Boraginaceae. The genera of South African flow-
ering plants, edn 2. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South
Africa No. 25: 625-633.
PIGGIN, C M. 1977. The herbaceous species of Echium (Boraginaceae)
naturalized in Australia. Muelleria 3: 215-244.
POYNTON, J.C. 1983. The dispersal versus vicariance debate in bio-
geography. Bothalia 14: 455^160.
RAFINESQUE. C.S. 1836-1838. Flora Telluriana 4. Philadelphia.
RETIEF, E. & VAN WYK, A.E. 1997. Palynology of southern African
Boraginaceae: the genera Lobostemon, Echiostachys and
Echium. Grana 36: 271-278.
REILLE, M. 1995. Pollen et spores d'Europe et d'Afrique du Nord.
Laboratoire de botanique historique et palynologie, Marseille.
RIEDL, H. 1967. Echium. Flora iranica 48: 213-215.
SMITH, C.A. 1966. Common names of South African plants. The
Government Printer, Pretoria.
STOTT, P. 1981. Historical plant geography. Allen & Unwin, London.
THUNBERG, C.P 1794. Prodromus plantarum capensium. Edman,
Uppsala.
TOELKEN, H R. 1986. Boraginaceae. In J P Jessop & H R Toelken,
Flora of South Australia 3: 1 146-1 173.
VERDCOURT, B. 1991. Echium. In R.M Polhill, Flora of tropical East
Africa. Boraginaceae : 81-83.
WRIGHT, C.H. 1904. Echium. Flora capensis 4,2: 43^15. Reeve, London.
ZOMLEFER, W.B. 1994. Guide to flowering plant families. University of
North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
Bothalia 28,2: 179-182 (1998)
A revision of Ledebouria (Hyacinthaceae) in South Africa. 2. Two
new species, L. crispa and L. parvifolia , and L. macowanii re-instated
S. VENTER* * and T.J. EDWARDS **t
Keywords: Hyacinthaceae, Ledebouria, new combination, new species. South Africa, taxonomy
ABSTRACT
Two endemic Ledebouria Roth species are described with notes, diagnostic characters, distributions and alliances. L.
crispa appears to be allied to L. socialis (Baker) Jessop with which it shares densely gregarious, epigeal bulbs and L. undu-
lata (Jacq.) Jessop of the Northern and Western Cape which shares crispate leaf margins. L. parvifolia is endemic to
Mpumalanga (eastern Transvaal) and was recorded from a single locality near Graskop; it differs from L. cooperi (Hook.f.)
Jessop in having hairy upper leaf surfaces. L. macowanii (Baker) S. Venter is re-instated; it is distinguished from L. cooperi
by its tightly clasping bulb scales and single cataphyll.
INTRODUCTION
Ledebouria Roth is distributed across Africa into the
southern tip of India and the northern tip of Madagascar
and includes 33 species. The genus is very well repre-
sented in South Africa with high species densities in the
central and eastern regions. This paper deals with two
new species recorded from Northern Province and
Mpumalanga respectively.
1. Ledebouria crispa S. Venter, sp. nov. L. sociali
(Baker) Jessop similis sed statura minore, marginibus
crispatis foliorum et bracteolisque flores subtendentibus
differt.
TYPE. — Northern Province, 2329 (Pietersburg): Farm
Majebeskraal, (-DC), Venter 11202 (PRE, holo.; NU,
UNIN).
Plants gregarious. Bulbs epigeal to semi-epigeal,
15-30 x 10-20 mm, ovoid to obovoid; dead bulb scales
pale brown, membranous, apices attenuate, live bulb
scales fleshy, tightly appressed, lacking threads when
torn; bulblets often abundant. Leaves 4-10, synanthous,
linear to linear-lanceolate, 20-70 x 4-6 mm, erectly
spreading, slightly succulent, glaucous, veins obscure;
margin crispate; base canaliculate; apex acute. Inflores-
cence solitary, erect, 40-50 mm long, 8-12-flowered;
scape terete, glaucous, glabrous, 40-50 mm long; bracts
and bracteoles membranous 1.2-1. 5 x 0.4 mm, linear-
lanceolate, glaucous. Pedicels spreading, 2^1 mm, green
suffused with pink. Tepals reflexed in distal half, oblong,
4. 0-5.0 x 1.0-1. 5 mm, pink, keel dull green, apex acute.
Stamens erect, 3. 0-3. 5 mm long; filaments pink, epite-
palous; anthers 0.5 mm long, mauve. Ovary depressed
ovoid, 2.5 x 3.0 mm, lobes obtusely deltoid, glabrous,
apex tapered; stipe 1 mm long. Style 3. 0-3. 5 mm, white.
t To whom correspondence should be addressed.
** Department of Botany, University of Natal, Private Bag X01, 3209
Scottsville.
* Part of this research was undertaken at the Department of Botany,
University of the North, Private Bag 1106, 0727 Sovenga, South
Africa.
MS. received: 1998-01-05.
Capsule symmetrical, globose-ovoid, base truncate. Seed
3.0 x 1.5 mm, drop-shaped, wrinkled, black. Figure 1.
L. crispa has only been recorded from hills surround-
ing Pietersburg. The substrates from which specimens
FIGURE 1. — Ledebouria crispa. A, habit, x 1.3; B, leaf lamina trans-
verse section, x 4.6; C, tepal apex, x 6.5; D, bract and bracteole,
x 10; E, flower, x 6.5; F, tepal with stamen, x 4.6; G, gynoeci-
um, lateral view, x 5. Drawn from Venter 11202 by F. Venter.
180
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
were collected are light brown, gritty loams derived from
talcose schists of the Mothiba Formation (Pietersburg
Group) (SACS 1980). Precipitation in the area occurs
predominantly in summer and ranges between 400-600
mm (Barnard et al. 1972). Plants grow in scattered
groups of 5 to 40 individuals in typical Pietersburg
Plateau False Grassveld (Acocks 1988). The species
flowers from October to December.
L. crispa is allied to a number of species with promi-
nent bulb necks and lacking extendable xylem ‘threads’
in their torn leaves. This complex includes L. concolor
(Baker) Jessop, L. crispa , L. undulata (Jacq.) Jessop, L.
ovalifolia (Schrad.) Jessop, L. petiolata (Van der Merwe)
S. Venter, L. socialis (Baker) Jessop and L. macowanii
(Baker) S. Venter.
L. crispa is distinguished from its allies by its diminu-
tive size, synanthous leaves with crispate margins, epi-
geal bulbs and solitary inflorescences. L. undulata, which
is limited in distribution to the Northern and Western
Cape, also has wavy leaf margins and solitary inflores-
cences but is a much larger, hysteranthous plant with a
hypogeal bulb. In addition the leaf undulation in L. undu-
lata is variable and plants from shaded situations tend to
have smooth margins. This differs from L. crispa in which
the crispate margins are unaffected by microhabitat. L.
socialis approaches L. crispa in a number of characters.
Its densely gregarious habit and epigeal bulbs are simi-
lar, but the former has maculate leaves with smooth mar-
gins and pedicels which are ebracteolate. In addition, the
species are allopatric; L. socialis is limited to the Eastern
Cape (Figure 2).
Specimens examined
NORTHERN PROVINCE. — 2329 (Pietersburg): Pietersburg Game
Reserve, (-CD), Venter 1 3209a (PRE, UNIN); Lebowa, Majebeskraal
Farm, (-DC), Venter 11202 (PRE, NU, UNIN).
2. Ledebouria parvifolia S. Venter, sp. nov. L.
cooperi (Hook.f.) Jessop arete affinis sed foliis appressis
FIGURE 2. — Geographical distribution of L. crispa, •; and L. parvi-
folia, M
superficie adaxiali trichomatibus basibus latis in seriebus
longitudinalibus dispositis differt.
TYPE. — Mpumalanga, 2430 (Pilgrims Rest): Graskop,
near Lisbon Falls, Farm Lisbon 531, (-DD), Venter
12609a (PRE, holo.).
Plants gregarious. Bulb hypogeal, 10-25 x 10-25 mm,
obovoid; dead bulb scales membranous, brown, apices
attenuate, with threads when torn, live bulb scales fleshy,
tightly appressed; bulblets usually present. Leaves en-
veloped by a single cataphyll, synanthous, 2 or 3, humi-
fuse, lanceolate to oblong, 15-30 x 15-20 mm, with
threads when torn, fleshy, dull green, adaxial surface with
longitudinal rows of papillae, venation obscure; margin
ciliate; base canaliculate; apex acute. Inflorescence soli-
tary, 25-35 mm long, erect, lax, 8-12-flowered; scape
terete, purple, glabrous, 10-15 mm long; bracts deltoid,
0.5 x 0.5 mm, pink to purple; bracteoles absent. Pedicels
cernuous, 2-3 mm long, pink. Tepals recurved distally,
equal, oblong, 2. 5-3.0 x 1.0 mm, pink with a green keel,
apex obtuse. Stamens erect, 3 mm long; filaments pink
epitepalous; anthers 0.5 mm long, pale violet. Ovary
ovoid, 3-lobed, 1x2 mm, lobes narrowly transversely
oblong, shoulders rounded; stipe 0.5 mm long. Style 3 mm
long, triangular in section, glabrous. Seed 3 mm long,
drop-shaped, strongly wrinkled, brown. Figure 3.
FIGURE 7>. —Ledebouria parvifolia. A, habit, x 0.6; B, leaf lamina
transverse section, x 0.9; C, tepal apex, x 7.6; D, bract, x 12.7;
E, tepal with stamen, x 7.6; F, flower, x 6.3; G, gynoecium, lat-
eral view, x 6.3. Drawn from Venter 12609a by F. Venter.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
181
This species was recorded from a single locality on
dolomites of the Malmani Formation in the Chuniespoort
Group (SACS 1980). Soils derived from these substrata
are fine-grained, dark brown clays. The species is a con-
stituent of montane grassland with scattered Dombeya
rotundifolia and Faurea saligna. L. parvifolia flowers
from October to December.
L. parvifolia is closely related to L. cooperi (Hook.f.)
Jessop but differs in producing appressed leaves with
longitudinal rows of broad-based hairs on their adaxial
surfaces. This indumental character is stable under a
wide range of environmental conditions. Both L. cooperi
and L. parvifolia produce a single basal cataphyll, a char-
acter not found elsewhere in the genus.
3. Ledebouria macowanii (Baker) S. Venter , comb.
nov.
Scilla macowanii Baker in The Gardener's Chronicle 3: 748 (1875).
Type: Cape, Somerset Division, Boschberg, MacOwan 1841 (GRA!,
lecto. here designated; BOL!; PRE!; Z photo.).
Scilla nelsonii Baker: 488 (1896). Type: Cape, Vaal River, Nelson
167 (K!, holo.; PRE!).
Plants weakly gregarious. Bulb hypogeal, 15-30 x
15-30 mm, ovoid; dead bulb scales tightly clasping,
lacking threads when tom; bulb neck 5-10 x 10 mm.
Leaves synanthous, 3 or 4, spreading, linear-lanceolate,
75-100 x 6-8 mm, without threads when torn, fleshy,
dull green, abaxial surface green with occasional purple
spots in the lower half, venation obscure; margin
smooth; base canaliculate; apex obtuse to acute.
Inflorescences 1 or 2, lax, cylindrical, 25-60 mm long,
flaccid, 20-40-flowered; scape base terete, spotted
40-100 mm long; bracts deltoid, 0.5 x 0.5 mm, green to
pink; lacking bracteoles. Pedicels 6-7 mm long, pink to
purple. Tepals oblong, slightly recurved, 4.0 x 1.5 mm,
apex obtuse, green suffused with pink. Stamens spread-
ing, 3.8 mm long; filaments white with purple above;
anthers 0.5 mm long, pale violet. Ovary globose, 6-
lobed, 1.5 x 2.0 mm, lobes obtusely deltoid with a basal
ridge; stipe 0.5 mm long. Style 2.0 mm long, triangular in
transverse section, purple. Seed drop-shaped, 3-4 mm
long, surface strongly wrinkled, brown.
L. macowanii is closely allied to L. socialis but differs
in its hypogeal bulbs and prominent nectariferous ridges
on the carpel bases. Jessop (1970) reduced this taxon to
synonymy with L. cooperi, however, it is distinguished
from L. cooperi by its tightly clasping bulb scales and
single cataphyll. In the Eastern Cape these species are
sometimes sympatnc but the range of L. macowanii ex-
tends up to the Northern Province (Figure 4). The species
appears to occur in areas of reasonably high precipita-
tion, hence its limitation to the coast and elevated areas
in which orographic rainfall occurs. Plants occur in
damp, shallow lithosols derived from quartzites, conglo-
merates or sandstones. The species usually occurs in
semi-shade. The flowering period of L. macowanii
extends from October to March with a peak in November
and December.
Specimens examined
NORTHERN PROVINCE. — 2231 (Pafuri): Punda Maria, Dzun-
dwini Hill, (-CC), Codd & Dyer 4598 (KNP, PRE). 2329 (Petersburg):
Louis Trichardt, (-BB), Koker 3 (PRE). 2331 (Phalaborwa): Letaba
Camp, (-DC), Codd 4675 (KNP, PRE). 2427 (Thabazimbi): Rooiberg,
(-DD), Van der Merwe 2044 (PRE).
MPUMALANGA. — 2431 (Acomhoek): Skukuza, (-DC), Codd &
De Winter 5076 (PRE); Mabase, (-DC), Lang s.n. (PRE).
NORTH-WEST. — 2527 (Rustenburg): Rustenburg, (-CA), Van der
Merwe 1558 (PRE).
SWAZILAND. — 2631 (Mbabane): Komati Bridge , (-AA), Compton
29391 (PRE); Usuthu Dam, (-CA), Compton 27120 (PRE). 2632 (Bela
Vista); Mbuluzi Nature Reserve, (-AA), Culverwell 1389 (PRE).
FREE STATE. — 2827 (Senekal); Doornkop Farm, (-DD), Goosens
777 (PRE). 2828 (Bethlehem): Clarence, (-CB), Van Hoepen 18270
(PRE). 2924 (Fauresmith): Farm Wanda, (-CB), Smook 3045 (PRE).
2927 (Maseru): Clocolan, Hillcrest Farm, (-BA), Crosby 420 (PRE).
KWAZULU-NATAL. — 2732 (Ubombo): Phelendaba Crossing, (-BA),
Germishuizen 3533 (PRE). 2832 (Mtubatuba): Enseleni Nature
Garden, (-CC), Venter 6115 (PRU).
NORTHERN CAPE. — 2824 (Kimberley): Riverton Pont, (-DB),
Leistner 2016 (PRE). 2923 (Douglas): Douglas, Herbert Dist., (-BB),
Orpen 57 (BOL).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3421 (Riversdale): Riversdale, (-AD), Bohnen
7461 (STE); Still Bay, (-AD), Bolus s.n. (BOL), Ferguson s.n. (BOL);
Albertinia, Ystervarkpunt, (-BC), Willemse 107 (STE). 3423 (Knysna):
Knysna, (-AA), Breyer 23711 (PRE).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3127 (Lady Frere): Glen Grey, Nzebanya
Mountain, (-CC), Galpin 1914 (PRE). 3226 (Fort Beaufort): Katberg
Mountain, (-DB), Bayliss 7442 (NBG). 3227 (Stutterheim): Pirie,
(-CC), Taylor 1760 (BOL); King Williams Town, (-CD), Sim 628
(NU), Sim 1075 (BOL), De Victoria 15 (BOL). 3228 (Butterworth):
Kwenqura River, (-CC), Galpin 5814 (PRE). 3326 (Grahamstown):
Peddie, Committee’s Drift, (-BB), Van der Merwe 2132 (PRE);
Blaauw Krantz, (-BD), Daly 1026 (BOL). 3327 (Peddie): East London,
(-BB), Wood 2817 (BOL), Rattray s.n. (BOL), Pamphlett 77 (NBG).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Financial assistance from the Natal University
Research Fund and the FRD is gratefully acknowledged.
The cited herbaria are thanked for the loan of material
examined during this study. Mr M. Lambert and Dr O.A.
Leistner are thanked for the Latin diagnoses. Sandy
Burrows is thanked for drawing the original plates from
which Figures 1 & 2 were modified by F. Venter. Mr K.
Gamble is thanked for his assistance in the field.
182
Bothalia 28,2(1998)
REFERENCES
ACOCKS, J.P.H. 1988. Veld Types of South Africa, 3rd edn. Memoirs
of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 57.
BAKER, J.G. 1875. New garden plants. The Gardener's Chronicle 3:
748.
BAKER, J.G. 1896. Liliaceae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora capensis
6: 253-528. Reeve, London.
BARNARD, W.S., SMIT. P. & VAN ZYL, J.A. 1972. Suid-Afrika: die
land en sy streke. Nasou. Cape Town.
JESSOP, J.P. 1970. Studies in the bulbous Liliaceae: 1. Scilla , Scltizo-
carphus and Ledebouria. Journal of South African Botany 36:
233-266.
SACS (SOUTH AFRICAN COMMITTEE FOR STRATIGRAPHY)
1980. Stratigraphy of South Africa, Part 1. Flandbook of the
Geological Survey of South A frica.
Bothalia 28,2: 183-196 (1998)
Notes on African plants
VARIOUS AUTHORS
METZGERIALES — FOSSOMBRONIACEAE
FOSSOMBRONIA OCCIDENTO-AFRICANA'. IS IT CONSPECIFIC WITH F INDICA1
INTRODUCTION
Fossombronia occidento-africana S.W. Amell (1952)
was described as a new species from his collections from
Mount Aureol [Mont Oriel] at Freetown, Sierra Leone,
West Africa. He cited the following collection numbers:
2409 , 2413, 2418, 2431, 2448, 2449, 2468, 2476 and
2497, but did not designate a type specimen. Arnell’s
only illustration of the new species is a simple line draw-
ing of a cross section of the stem, with a single down-
ward-projecting rhizoid.
Because Jones & Harrington (1983) considered
Arnell’s description to be inaccurate in certain aspects,
they presented a more thoroughly investigated descrip-
tion. They also selected the specimen Arnell 2497 as the
lectotype for the following reasons: they considered it to
be Arnell’s most copious collection with numerous
mature sporangia; in addition, Arnell had made a micro-
scope preparation of it. They cited several other Arnell
specimens, namely 2409, 2413, 2448, 2517, as well as
2231 and 2249, but according to Arnell’s numbers given
above, the last two numbers must be incorrect and should
read 2431 and 2449 respectively. From Sierra Leone they
also cited several Harrington specimens: 504, 555, 599 &
640 and one Richards specimen, R7086, as well as Sellar
B35 p.p. From Ghana, three Hall specimens were cited,
and from Abuja in northern Nigeria, Jones (1985) cited
his own collection, Jones 885a. Jones & Harrington
(1983) found F. occidento-africana to be the most com-
mon species of F ossombronia in lowland West Africa.
Augier (1985) also reported it from Cameroun, after first
assigning his specimens to F. crozalsii (Augier 1972) and
Tixier (1989) cited Brunei 8838 from Togo. Neither
Jones nor Jones & Harrington published an illustration of
the species. Scott & Pike (1988), in their wide-ranging
study of Fossombronia species, published two spore
micrographs of F. occidento-africana (their figs. 25, 26)
and placed it in synonymy under F. indica Steph.
Evidently unaware of the lectotypification of F. occiden-
to-africana by Jones & Harrington, they selected Arnell
2249 as the lectotype. This number, in all probability,
should be 2449. The incorrectly cited numbers by both
Jones & Harrington and Scott & Pike are a curious coin-
cidence, and it suggests that the said numbers were
incorrectly copied on the herbarium packets held at (S).
As the holdings on loan from the Swedish Museum of
Natural History (S) had already been returned by me, I
could not check these numbers myself. However, Prof.
R. Stotler (in litt.) agrees with me that the Arnell 22 xx
numbers are ‘surely a mistake by Arnell, since all of his
other nine Fossombronia collections (of F. occidento-
africana) are 24 xx’.
This paper is presented because F. occidento-africana
has not been illustrated, except for ArneH’s single figure
of the stem cross section and the two spore micrographs
by Scott & Pike (1988). I also needed to investigate the
placement of F. occidento-africana in synonymy under
F. indica implemented by Scott & Pike.
Fossombronia occidento-africana S.W. Arnell in
Botaniska Notiser 3: 317 (1952); Jones & Harrington:
248 (1983). Type: Sierra Leone, Freetown Peninsula,
Mount Aureol (‘Oriel’), Amell 2497 (S, lecto.!).
Plants in crowded stands, green; shoots smallish, sim-
ple (Figure 2A), up to 7 or 8 mm long, 1.3-1. 4 mm high,
± 2.6 mm wide, occasionally once furcate, apical seg-
ments moderately divergent, up to 3 mm long. Stems
prostrate, tapering proximally, chlorophyllose, some-
times with a young ventrolateral branch (Figure 2B),
planoconvex in cross section, toward apex (Figure IK) ±
350 pm (11 cell rows) high, ± 420 pm wide, basally
(Figure 1L) ± 250 x 300 pm. Rhizoids purple, 12.5-22.5
pm wide. Leaves (Figure 1A-H) overlapping, suc-
cubously inserted, apically small, soon becoming larger,
oblong to broadly obovate or rounded, mostly shorter
than wide, but often somewhat narrower below, apex
truncate or rounded, sometimes shallowly notched,
slightly undulate, (875— )950— 1 275 x 1050-1400 pm,
margins with 4-7 well-spaced papillae, 30 x 20 pm, usu-
ally sessile, sometimes at base of leaf raised on 1-3
elongated cells, the latter arranged end to end. Leaf cells
thin-walled, at upper margins (Figure II) rectangular
across, 25.0-42.5 x 30.0-52.5 pm, at lateral margins
long-rectangular, 50.0-57.5 x 25.0-30.0 pm; upper 1am-
inal cells 5- or 6-sided, 37.5-50.0 x 22.5-30.0; middle
laminal cells 37.5-62.5 x 35.0-37.5 pm; basal cells
57.5-75.0 x 27.5-37.5 pm. Oil bodies disintegrated in
the material seen; chloroplasts (Figure 1J) numerous,
mostly rounded, ± 2.5 pm diam.
Monoicous. Antheridia dorsal on stem, at apex appar-
ently naked, intact, short-stalked, globose (Figure 2C), ±
160 pm diam., further along branch disintegrated, but
perigonial bracts (Figure 2A, D) remaining, irregularly
shaped (Figure 1M-P), base up to 350 x 140 pm, with
one or occasionally two, tapering, apical appendage(s),
250-500 pm long, a papilla at the tip(s). Archegonia in a
row dorsally along stem (Figure 2A). Pseudoperianth
(Figure IQ, R) near stem apex (Figure 2E), funnel-
shaped, up to 1175 pm long, width across flaring mouth
(Figure 2F) ± 1500 pm wide, with ± 8 triangular lobes,
each topped by a papilla, constricted toward base, ± 500
pm wide, sometimes deeply cleft on one side, free mar-
gins overlapping slightly; cells comparable in size and
184
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE I — Fossombronia occidento-africana. A-H, leaves; I, margin of leaf with 2 papillae; J, middle laminal cells with chloroplasts, oil bod-
ies disintegrated; K, c/s of stem apex; L, c/s of stem base; M-P, perigonial bracts; Q, pseudoperianth from side; R, opened pseudoperianth;
S, c/s of seta; T, cells in capsule wall with thickenings. A-T, S.W. Arnell 2448. Scale bars: A-H, Q, R, 500 pm; I, S, 100 pm; J, T, 50 pm;
K, L, M-P, 250 pm. Artist; M. Steyn.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
185
FIGURE 2. — Fossombronia occidento-africana. A, simple branch with row of archegonia and single perigonial bract (indicated by arrow); B,
branch with young ventrolateral shoot; C, apex of branch with antheridia (indicated by arrows) and archegonia; D, apex of branch with
archegonium and papillae around its base; perigonial bract in foreground (indicated by arrow); E, pseudoperianth near apex of branch; F,
pseudoperianth from above and part of rather shrivelled seta (indicated by arrow). A-F, S.W Arnell 2448. A, x 12; B, x 32; C, x 50; D, x
57; E, x 19; F, x 46.
shape to those of leaves. Capsules globose, ± 675 pm
diam., wall bistratose, inner cell layer with irregularly
rectangular cells, 27.5^4-2.5 x 22.5-25.0 pm, on both
longitudinal and tangential walls, with 2^1 deep brown,
heavy subnodular thickenings, some of which are pro-
longed to form complete or incomplete semi-annular
bands (Figure IT). Seta up to 3 mm long, ± 100 pm
diam. (Figure IS). Spores light brown, ± hemispherical,
40-50 pm diam.; distal face (Figure 3A-D) convex, with
8 or 9 tall and thin, very irregular, rather wavy lamellae
running ± longitudinally or diagonally across face,
spaced ± 5 pm apart and interconnected by transverse
ridges, forming irregular, complete or mostly incomplete
areolae, walls smooth above or rather ragged, sometimes
raised into processes at the angles; proximal face (Figure
3E) lacking triradiate mark, ornamented with irregular,
FIGURE 3. — Fossombronia occidento-africana. Spores and elaters. A, B, distal face; C, side view of distal face; D, close-up of distal face mar-
gin; E, proximal face; F, elaters. A-F, S. W. Arnell 2497. A, x 832; B, x 940; C, x 987; D, x 1757; E, x 825; F, x 555.
186
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
faint and low ridges or granules that are interconnected,
around spore periphery numerous spines that are not
readily individually distinguishable nor joined by a dis-
tinct perispore. Elaters (Figure 3F) light brown, 102-167
pm long, 10.0-12.5 pm wide in middle, and trispiral,
tapering to tips, 5. 0-7. 5 pm wide, frequently ending in a
bispiral loop, occasionally branched.
DISCUSSION
Arnell (1952) was able to study fresh plants of F. occi-
dento-africana and described them as dark green; in old
herbarium specimens the colour may have faded to a
lighter green.
Jones & Harrington (1983) could not confirm the
presence on the leaf cuticle of ‘1-2 long striae per cell’
and ‘sometimes small trigones’ (at the cell corners pre-
sumably) that Arnell reported; neither could I. Arnell
(1952) described F. occidento-africana as dioicous, the
male plants ‘with antheridia on the dorsal side near the
apex, covered by rather long narrow bracts with deeply
bidentate apex. Antheridia about 100 pm diam., pale yel-
low, globose’. Jones & Harrington (1983) on the other
hand, described the species as ‘monoecious, but proba-
bly protandrous’, and do not mention antheridia or
perigonial bracts at all. As I have now demonstrated, the
species is monoicous and perigonial bracts do in fact
occur. Jones & Harrington (1983) reported ‘massive
radial thickened bands’ on the cells of the inner spo-
rangium wall, with which I agree. Arnell (1952) found
the spore ‘pattern’ of F. occidento-africana to be the
same as that of F. stephani (sic) from Reunion (lamellis
interrupts vermicularibus), but the spores of the former
are smaller in size, according to him. Scott & Pike (1988:
figs 29, 30) illustrated the spores of F. stephanii and
remarked that they ‘are very similar indeed to those of F.
texana (= F. mexicanaf the disjunction from Central
America to Reunion Island (off East Africa) seems phy-
togeographically improbable, so that we hesitate to
equate the two without further investigation’. In the same
study, Scott & Pike (1988: figs 33, 34) remark that F. tex-
ana has sometimes been confused with the F. foveolata
complex (Scott & Pike 1987). In following this train of
thought the spores of F. occidento-africana should be
similar to those of F. foveolata which I don’t think to be
the case, except that they are both reticulate. Jones &
Harrington (1983) admit that F. occidento-africana ‘may
indeed prove to be F. crozalsii Corbiere, which is, how-
ever, imperfectly known’. Furthermore, they state, ‘we
prefer to keep the two species (i.e. F. crozalsii and F.
occidento-africana ) separate until the range of variation
of F. crozalsii is adequately known’. British collections
of F. crozalsii have been referred to F. pusilla var. mar-
itima by Paton (1973).
Scott & Pike (1988: figs 25, 26) reduced F. occiden-
to-africana to synonymy under F. indica, describing the
spores of the former as ‘very distinct, with a very delicate
reticulum of low lamellae over the distal face and a cob-
web-like network over the proximal face. In this as well
as vegetative features it seems identical to F. indica
Stephani, an earlier name, to which we here reduce it as
a synonym’. I hesitate to accept this reduction for the fol-
lowing reasons: the type (and only known) specimen of
F. indica (leg. Pfleiderer s.n.) is a small and delicate
plant, its dimensions agreeing with those given by
Srivastava & Udar (1975), i.e. ‘stem 3. 5-5.0 mm long’.
This is rather shorter than the 8 or 10 mm long thallus
branches reported by previous authors for F. occidento-
africana and considerably shorter than Stephani ’s (1917)
length of 13 mm for F. indica. The very spinous spore
drawing in Stephani’s (1985) leones no. 003006 is total-
ly unlike the low, incomplete and irregularly areolate
spore markings of the type specimen of F. indica (Figure
4A-C). A note on the leones reads ‘fehlt Original’ but the
meaning of this is not clear. Srivastava & Udar wrote
that, ‘ Fossombronia indica St. (M.S.) Lucknow
University Hepatic Herbarium (a part of the materials of
the original collection presented to Prof. S.K. Pande by
Rev. P. Pfleiderer) India Orientalis, Mangalore. Legit.
Pfleiderer (part of type?) Det.: Stephani 1917. F. indica
was instituted by Stephani (1917) on the basis of the
materials collected by Pfleiderer from Mangalore, South
India. It has neither been collected nor investigated
again, after Stephani’s (1917) original publication’.
The spores of F. indica as measured by Stephani are
36 pm, although he had written on the leones, beneath
the spore drawing, 45 pm. Srivastava & Udar report
them to be ‘38.4-48.0 pm in diameter’, but I found them
to be 30.0-37.5 pm and the poorly developed lamellae
rather low, irregular and interrupted. The dimensions of
the ± oblong leaves are 750-875 x 625-875 pm, also
rather smaller than those of F. occidento-africana.
Until more material of F. indica is collected and stud-
ied, I think that it is advisable to reject the synonymy of
FIGURE 4. — Fossombronia initial Spores. A, distal face; B, side view of distal face; C, proximal face. A-C, Pfleiderer s.n. A, x 1078; B, x 11 89;
C, x 1147.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
187
F. occidento-africana under F. indica and to reinstate the
much better known F. occidento-africana S.W.Arnell.
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
Amell 2409 , 2431 S, 2448 PRE, 2497 (lectotype) S.
Jones 854 PRE.
Pfleiderer s.n. C(16585).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I wish to sincerely thank the curators of G and S as
well as Prof. R. Stotler, ABSH, for the loan of specimens.
Prof. Stotler is also thanked for checking the collection
numbers on four Arnell specimens. My thanks to Ms D.
Maree for typing the manuscript, Mrs M. Steyn for the
drawings and Mrs A. Romanowski for developing and
printing the photographs.
REFERENCES
ARNELL, S.W. 1952. Hepaticae collected in South and West Africa
(1951). New and little known species. Botaniska Notiser 105:
307-329.
AUGIER, J. 1972 Groupements de bryophytes terricoles sur le campus
universitaire de Yaounde. Annates de la Faculte des Sciience
Universitaire fed. Cameroun 9: 73-85.
AUGIER, J. 1985. Cles de determination pour les Hepatiques et
Anthocerotes au Cameroun forestier. Contribution a la Flore du
Cameroun (Cryptogamie) — essai destine aux etudiants et aux
chercheurs en Rue et regions voisines W — et centre-africaines.
JONES, E.W. 1985. Bryophytes of forest and savanna in northern
Nigeria. Cryptogamie, Bryologie & Lichenologie 6: 259-277 .
JONES, E.W. & HARRINGTON, A.J 1983. The hepatics of Sierra
Leone and Ghana. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural
History (Botany) 11: 215-289.
PATON, J.A. 1973. Taxonomic studies in the genus Fossombronia
Raddi. Journal of Bryology 7: 243-252.
SCOTT, G.A.M. & PIKE, D.C. 1987. The Fossombronia foveolata
complex. Lindbergia 13: 79-84.
SCOTT, G.A.M. & PIKE, D.C. 1988. Revisionary notes on Fossom-
bronia. The Bryologist 91: 193-201.
SRIVASTAVA, S.C. & UDAR, R. 1975. The genus Fossombronia
Raddi in India. Nova Hedwigia 26: 790-845.
STEPHANI, F. 1917. Species hepaticarum. Bulletin de V Herbier
Boissier 6: 73.
STEPHANI, F. 1985. leones hepaticarum. Microfiche. Inter
Documentation Company bv, Leiden.
TIXIER, P. 1989. Bryophyta exotica — 8. Recoltes de J-F. Brunei au
Togo (1983-1985). Candollea 44: 493-511.
S.M. PER OLD*
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XI 01, Pretoria 0001.
MS. received: 1998-04-15.
NEW RECORDS FROM KWAZULU-NATAL, SOUTH AFRICA
INTRODUCTION
Eastern coastal links between the flora of southern
Africa and tropical East Africa are well established but
authors have concentrated on arborescent taxa (White
1965, 1971; Moll & White 1978). The southern exten-
sion of tropical species on the eastern coast of Africa is
largely the result of the ameliorating effects of the
Mozambique Current. Moll & White (1978) briefly out-
lined the vegetation of the Indian Ocean Coastal belt and
drew attention to the strong links which exist between
Tongaland-Pondoland and Zanzibar-Inhambane woody
floras. Recently Microcoelia obovata Summerh. (Orchi-
daceae) and Pseuderanthemum hildebrandtii Lindau
(Acanthaceae) were collected in northern KwaZulu-Natal.
These records further reflect the vegetation links between
the northern areas of KwaZulu-Natal and tropical East
Africa. The new records also highlight the importance of
amateur botanists, such as Mr E. Harrison, in the further
discovery of our flora.
ACANTHACEAE
1. Pseuderanthemum hildebrandtii Lindau in
Botanischer Jahrbiicher 20: 39 (1895a); Lindau: 330
(1895b); C.B.Clarke: 1 72 ( 1 899); Milne-Redh.: 260 (1936).
Type: Tanzania, Zanzibar, at Kidoti, Hildebrandt 981 (syn.,
designated by Milne-Redhead l.c. as ‘type’).
The genus Pseuderanthemum Radik, includes about
120 species and has a pantropical distribution (Dyer
1975). The genus was created to include species of the
tribe Justiceae which had formerly been placed in
Eranthemum (Ruellieae), Eranthemum sensu stricto does
not occur in Africa (Milne-Redhead 1936). Pseuderan-
themum is most closely related to Ruspolia, the latter
being distinguished by its monothecous anthers (Figure
5). In general the African species of Pseuderanthemum
occur in closed forests and produce long, narrow corollas
which are usually white or insipidly coloured. Formerly
only one species was recorded from South Africa, name-
ly P. subviscosum (C.B.Clarke) Stapf which occurs as a
herb of subtropical forest and is characterised by its long,
narrowly tubular white flowers. P. hildebrandtii (Figure
5) diverges from this typical pattern in producing brick-
red flowers very similar to those of Ruspolia hypocrater-
iformis (Vahl) Milne-Redh. from which it is distin-
guished by its bithecous anthers, slender habit and small-
er leaves. The floral similarity to R. hypocrateriformis
transcends colour to the extent that Clarke (1899) omit-
ted a detailed description of floral dimensions in his
description of Eranthemum hildebrandtii C.B.Clarke (-
Pseuderanthemum hildebrandtii) substituting ‘otherwise
as E. hypocrateriforme Roem. & Schultes’. This uncanny
floral convergence correlates with a similarity in habitat for
the two species and probably indicates shared pollinators.
P. hildebrandtii occurs in woodland and along forest mar-
gins (not on forest floors like P. subviscosum)-, this differ-
ence in habitat is likely to be associated with different pol-
linators and different floral pigments.
The sculpturing of the seeds of P. hildebrandtii is also
atypical for Pseuderanthemum in that the inner and outer
seed surfaces have different patterns (Figure 6), a trend
common in Ruspolia.
Although the distributions of other African species of
Pseuderanthemum are patchy, no major disjunctions
occur. By contrast, the collection of P. hildebrandtii in
South Africa, produces a disjunction which mirrors that of
188
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 5. — A, C, D, Pseuderanthemum hildebrandtii, Harrison 1041: A, flowering branch, x 0.8; C, anthers, x 47; D, calyces, x 8. B, Ruspolia
hypocrateriformis, S Venter 12915, monothecous anther, x 31
Ruspolia hypocrateriformis . The main concentration of P.
hildebrandtii occurs in eastern Tanzania and eastern and
central Kenya between 0° and 10° south of the equator.
The main populations of Ruspolia hypocrateriformis tra-
verse similar but wider latitudes on the West Coast from
Senegal in the north, to northern Angola in the south
(Figure 7). Both species then display large disjunctions to
their southern outliers. The southern populations of P.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
189
FIGURE 6. — Seed of Pseuderanthe-
mum hildebrandtii, Harrison
1041 . A, outer surface; B, inner
surface. Scale bars: 2 mm
hildebrandtii occur in the Lebombo Mountains of
KwaZulu-Natal, some 2 400 km to the south. Likewise
the southern variety of R. hypocrateriformis is recorded
from Northern Province (Arnold & De Wet 1993) dis-
playing a disjunction of some 2 300 km. The Acanthaceae
are characterised by explosive capsules with elastic funi-
cles (jaculators) which are effective short-distance dis-
tributors of seed and it is difficult to conceive that the
species are capable of long-distance dispersal. From their
similar flowers, dispersal capabilities and habitat, it
seems likely that similar historical events may have led to
the vicarious distributions these two allies display.
KWAZULU-NATAL. — 2731 (Louwsburg): between Ingwavuma and
Jozini Dam, (-AA), Harrison 1041 (NU, PRE).
ORCHIDACEAE
2. Microcoelia obovata Summerh. in Botanical
museum leaflets 11: 253 (1945); Piers: 276 (1968);
FIGURE 7. — Distribution of Ruspolia hypocrateriformis, •; Pseude-
ranthemum hildebrandtii, ■
Jonsson: 83 (1981). Type: Tanzania, Lushoto, Lwengera
Valley, Moreau 445a (K, holo.).
Microcoelia Lindl. includes about 27 species and is
limited in distribution to Madagascar and tropical and
southern Africa (Cribb 1989). Currently this leafless
genus of epiphytes is represented by a single species, M.
exilis Lindl. in South Africa. This species is widespread in
Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, Zaire, Zambia, Malawi,
Mozambique, Zimbabwe, South Africa and Madagascar.
Unlike the distributional patterns of African Pseuderan-
themum species, disjuncts are common in Microcoelia.
Species such as M. macrorrhynchia (Schltr.) Summerh.,
M. konduensis (De Wild.) Summerh. and M. microglossa
Summerh. are scattered patchily through tropical Africa,
whereas M. koehleri (Schltr.) Summerh. displays wide
tropical disjunctions. In fact one species, M. physophora
(Rchb.f.) Summerh., traverses the ocean barrier between
mainland Africa and Madagascar (Jonsson 1981). These
patterns are probably the product of seed vagility.
190
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
M. obovata was recorded from Kenya, Tanzania and
northern Mozambique in a recent revision (Jonsson
1981). The South African collection was made at Lake
Sibaya some 1 440 km to the south of the southernmost
point recorded in Jonsson (l.c.) (Figure 8). In South Africa
the species appears to be restricted to sparse populations
in fairly dense coastal forest at Lake Sibaya, Veld Type
no. 1, Coastal Thornveld & Forest (Acocks 1988).
M. obovata is distinguished by its semicircularly in-
curved spur, (2.0-)3.5-5.6 mm long and conspicuously
elongate labellum, (4.9-)7.6(-9.0) x 3. 1-6.0 mm, which
exceeds the remaining perianth parts by a third to half
their length.
KWAZULU-NATAL.— 2732 (Ubombo): Lake Sibayi, (-BC),
Harrison & Rolfe 1044 (NU).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Natal University Research Fund is thanked for
their financial assistance and the National Herbarium
(PRE) is thanked for the loan of specimens. The keeper
of the Herbarium at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (K)
is thanked for access to their collections of P. hilde-
brandtii.
REFERENCES
ACOCKS, J PH. 1988. Veld Types of South Africa, 3rd edn. Memoirs
of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 57.
ARNOLD, T.H. & DE WET, B.C. 1993. Plants of southern Africa:
names and distribution. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of
South Africa No. 62.
CLARKE, C.B. 1899. Acanthaceae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora of
tropical Africa 25: 172.
CRIBB, P. 1989. Orchidaceae. In R.H. Polhill, Flora of tropical East
Africa: 511-521.
DYER, R.A. 1975. The genera of South African flowering plants, Vol.
2. Government Printer, Pretoria.
JONSSON, L. 1981. A revision of the genus Microcoelia (Orchi-
daceae). Symbolae botanicae upsalienses 23,4: 1-150.
LINDAU, G. 1895a. Acanthaceae africana II. Botanischer Jahrbiicher
20: 39.
LINDAU, G. 1895b. Acanthaceae. Die natiirlichen Pflanzenfamilien 4,
3B: 330.
MILNE-REDHEAD, E. 1936. Eranthemum of the ‘Flora of tropical
Africa’. Kew Bulletin: 255-274.
MOLL, E. & WHITE, F. 1978. The Indian Ocean Coastal Belt. In
M.J.A. Werger, Biogeography and ecology of southern Africa 1 :
561-598. Junk, The Hague.
PIERS, F. 1968. Orchids of East Africa, 2nd edn. Germany.
SUMMERHAYES, V.S. 1945. African orchids XV. Botanical museum
leaflets 1 1 : 249-260.
WHITE, F. 1965. The savanna woodlands of the Zambesian and
Sudanian Domains. An ecological and phytogeographical com-
parison. Webbia 19: 651-681.
WHITE, F 1971. The taxonomic and ecological basis of chorology.
Mitteilungen aus der Botanischen Staatssammlung, Miinchen
10: 91-112.
T.J. EDWARDS* and E. HARRISON**
* Botany Department, University of Natal, Private Bag X01, 3209
Scottsville.
** P.O.Box 104, 3935 Mtubatuba.
MS. received: 1998-01-05.
CYPERACEAE
COLEOCHLOA SETIFERA NEW TO THE FLORA OF KWAZULU-NATAL
Recently, Niels Jacobsen conducted a botanical sur-
vey on and near the site of a proposed new dam in the
Vryheid District of KwaZulu-Natal. The area is botani-
cally almost unexplored, as it has a very rugged terrain.
In February 1997 Coleochloa setifera (Ridl.) Gilly was
collected, representing yet another addition to Ross’s
Flora of Natal and Gordon-Gray’s Cyperaceae in Natal
(1995). For workers who are unfamiliar with the plant,
a brief description (based partly on Nelmes 1954) fol-
lows.
Coleochloa setifera (Ridl.) Gilly in Brittonia 5:14
(1943); Nelmes: 378 (1954); Compton: 73 (1976);
Haines & Lye: 363 (1983); Forbes: 39 (1987); Kativu: 36
(1994); Lebrun & Stork: 173 (1995). Syntypes:
Madagascar, Deans Cowan s.n.\ Hilsenberg & Bojer s.n.
Fintelmannia setifera Ridl: 337 (1883). Eriospora setifera (Ridl.)
C.B. Clarke: 676 (1894); Chermezon: 270 (1937).
Eriospora rehmanniana C.B.Clarke: 297 (1898); Schdnland: 65
(1922). Coleochloa rehmanniana (C.B. Clarke) Gilly: 14 (1943). Type:
Northern Province, Houtbosch, Rehmann 5624 (K, holo. [PRE, frag-
ment]).
Mat-forming perennial up to 400 mm tall, leaves and
culms sparsely to densely hairy. Shoots densely tufted,
intravaginal. Leaves 2-ranked, striate; sheaths open,
lower glossy reddish brown, upper reddish brown at
extreme base, otherwise green; ligule comprising a line
of hairs; blades convolute, ± 1 mm diam., upper surface
glabrous, lower sparsely to densely villous, ultimately
blades deciduous. Culm striate, rounded, ±1.5 mm diam.
Inflorescence a slender, 1-3-noded, suberect panicle.
Spikelets in rounded pedicelled clusters 4-5 mm long;
glumes chartaceous, pale to reddish brown, distichous, 4
or 5 per spikelet, upper 2 or 3 fertile, sometimes male
only, or female below and male above, uppermost some-
times empty. Style becoming pyramidal, hollow; stigmas
3. Nutlet whitish, 3-4 mm long, with pericarp not fused
to endosperm (thus resembling perigynium in Carex),
subtended by a cupule of whitish hairs less than, to
equalling length of nutlet. Flowering and fruiting mostly
mid- to late summer (October to March). Figure 9.
KWAZULU-NATAL. — 2731 (Louwsburg): Vryheid Dist., Farm
Dipka 590, ± 23 km north of Coronation on Manzana River, 720 m,
(-CA), Jacobsen 5484 (PRE).
This new record for KwaZulu-Natal is not altogether
unexpected, as C. setifera is quite widespread in hard
rocky outcrops (composed of e.g. quartzite, granite or
norite) in Northern Province, North-West, Gauteng,
Mpumalanga and Swaziland (Figure 10). It also occurs
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
191
FIGURE 9. — Coleuchloa setifera. Habit, x 0.3. Photograph by A.
Romanowski.
in eastern tropical Africa (Mozambique, Zimbabwe,
Zambia, Malawi. Kenya, Tanzania) and on Madagascar.
In KwaZulu-Natal the species was observed growing in
crevices in exposed quartzite on a steep east-facing slope
above the Manzana River on Dipka Farm. It was also
observed in the vegetative state on the neighbouring No.
1 of Skurwerand 277 Farm, Paulpietersburg District.
The genus is confined to Africa and Madagascar, rep-
resented by s^ven species and one variety distributed in
FIGURE 10. — Distribution of Coleochloa Gilly in southern Africa (speci-
mens in PRE). C. setifera, •; C. pallidior , ■
the eastern half of tropical Africa. The other southern
Africa species, C. pallidior , occurs on the Soutpansberg
in Northern Province (Figure 10), and nearby in southern
Zimbabwe.
C. setifera has some economic value, for example in
Mpumalanga the wiry leaves and culms are used to make
rope (cf. Van der Schijff729, PRE) and in Swaziland they
are woven into mats (cf. Compton 26119\ 30861, both
PRE).
There are additional reasons why the species merits
further study:
1 . Taxonomic confusion
The unique loosely attached pericarp was initially
interpreted as a perigynium; therefore Coleochloa and
related genera were once classified in the Tribe Cariceae
Kunth ex Dumort. (Clarke 1897/1898). More recently
they have been classified in other tribes including
Sclerieae Kunth ex Fenzl (Clarke 1908; Raynal 1963),
and Lagenocarpeae Gilly (Gilly 1943) but have finally
been placed in their own small tribe, Trilepideae Goetgh.
(Goetghebeur 1985), which comprises Coleochloa Gilly,
the South American Trilepis Nees and the West African
Afrotrilepis (Gilly) J. Raynal and Microdracoides Hua.
At species level, there is some doubt as to the distinc-
tion between C. setifera and its geographically nearest
neighbour, C. pallidior Nelmes. Nelmes (1954) disting-
uished them by the latter species having, inter alia,
loosely tufted extravaginal shoots, glabrous leaves and
culms, leaves 3-4 mm wide, and nutlet 3. 0-3. 5 mm long,
subtended by a cupule of hairs less than half the length
of the nutlet. Browning & Gordon-Gray (1992) and
Kativu (1994), however, suggest that the differences are
not nearly as clear-cut as indicated by Nelmes and that
there is a need for extensive fieldwork. At present in the
National Herbarium the two species are retained as sepa-
rate entities.
2. Ecophysiology
Members of the tribe colonise habitats which experi-
ence periods of extreme desiccation. The other three
genera produce aerial stem-like structures composed of
the remains of leaf bases intergrown with thick adventi-
tious roots, similar to the ‘stems’ in Xerophyta Juss.
(Velloziaceae). This stem-like development is not very
marked in Coleochloa itself, however. C. setifera, stud-
ied by the author in several field localities and in the
herbarium, was seen to form dense mats of leaf bases and
roots, filling the cracks in rocks. It has been shown
(Porembski & Barthlott 1995), that these roots possess a
velamen which is able to absorb water rapidly, thus the
plant is able to capitalise on brief showers of rain.
REFERENCES
BROWNING, J. & GORDON-GRAY, K.D. 1992. The genus Coleochloa
Gilly. Notulae cyperologicae 8. Cyperaceae Newsletter 1 1: 7-9.
CHERMEZON, H. 1937. 29e famille — Cyperacees. In H. Humbert,
Flore de Madagascar. 270. Tananarive.
CLARKE, C.B 1894. Eriospora setifera. In T.A. Durand & H Schinz,
Conspectus florae Africae 5: 676. Brussels.
192
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
CLARKE, C.B 1897/1898. Cyperaceae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora
capensis 7: 149-310. Reeve, London.
CLARKE, C.B 1908. New genera and species of Cyperaceae. Kew Bul-
letin, add. sen 8.
COMPTON, R H 1976. The Flora of Swaziland. Journal of South
African Botany. Suppl. Vol. 1 1
FORBES, P.L. 1987. Cyperaceae. In T.K. Lowrey & S. Wright, The
Flora of the Witwatersrand Vol. I The Monocotyledonae:
29-64. Witwatersrand University Press, Johannesburg.
GILLY, C.L. 1943. An Afro-South American Cyperaceous complex. Brit-
tonia 5: 1-20.
GOETGHEBEUR, P. 1985. Studies in Cyperaceae 6. Nomenclature of
the suprageneric taxa in the Cyperaceae. Taxon 34: 617-632.
GORDON-GRAY, K.D. 1972. Cyperaceae. In J.H. Ross, Flora of Natal.
Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 39: 99-
103.
GORDON-GRAY, K.D. 1995. Cyperaceae in Natal. Strelitzia 2.
HAINES, R.W & LYE, K.A. 1983. The sedges and rushes of East
Africa'. 363. East African Natural History Society, Nairobi.
KATIVU, S. 1994. Notes on Coleochloa Gilly (Cyperaceae) in the Flora
z.ambesiaca area. Kirkia 15: 33-37.
LEBRUN, J.-P. & STORK, A.L. 1995. Enumeration des pluntes a
fleurs d'Afrique tropicale Vol. Ill — Monoctyledones: Limno-
charitaceae a Poaceae. Conservatoire et Jardin botanique de la
Ville de Geneve, Geneve.
NELMES, E. 1954. Notes on Cyperaceae: XXXI. The African genus
Coleochloa. Kew Bulletin 1953: 373-381.
POREMBSKI, S. & BARTHLOTT, W. 1995. On the occurrence of a
velamen radicum in Cyperaceae and Velloziaceae. Nordic Jour-
nal of Botany 15: 625-629.
RAYNAL, J. 1963. Notes cyperologiques. I . Afrotrilepis , nouveau genre
africain. Adansonia , ser. 2, 3: 250-265.
RIDLEY, H.N. 1883. Descriptions and notes on new or rare
Monocotyledones plants from Madagascar, with one from
Angola. Journal of the Linnean Society Botany 20: 337.
SCHONLAND, S. 1922. Introduction to South African Cyperaceae.
Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 3.
Government Printer, Pretoria.
C. ARCHER*
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X 1 0 1 , 0001 Pretoria.
MS. received: 1997-04-23.
ASTERACEAE
KEY TO THE SPECIES OF THE GENUS HERTIA IN SOUTHERN AFRICA
New combinations of the species of Hertia Less, in
southern Africa were made in different books or journals:
H. alata (Thunb.) Kuntze (Kuntze 1891), H. ciliata
(Harv.) Kuntze (Kuntze 1891; Merxmiiller 1967), H.
cluytiifolia (DC.) Kuntze (Kuntze 1891), H. kraussii
(Sch.Bip.) Fourc. (Fourcade 1941), H. pallens (DC.)
Kuntze (Kuntze 1891; Merxmiiller 1967). A key to only
two of the species ( H . ciliata and H. pallens) is given in
Merxmiiller (1967). A practical key is presented here to
distinguish between the southern African species for use
in the herbarium:
1 a Heads radiate H. pallens
lb Heads disciform:
2a Heads 5-20 per corymb; corymbs numerous H. alata
2b Heads solitary, terminal on branches or in leaf axils:
3a Pedicels 2-8 x longer than leaves H. kraussii
3b Pedicels shorter, ± half to one and a half times longer
than leaves:
4a Leaves obovate-elliptic, obtuse, entire, drying pale . . .
H. cluytiifolia
4b Leaves cuneate-oblong, 3-5-toothed, drying dark . . .//. ciliata
REFERENCES
FOURCADE, H.G. 1941. Checklist of the flowering plants of the divi-
sions of George, Knysna, Humansdorp and Uniondale. Memoirs
of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 20: 27.
KUNTZE, O. 1891. Dicotyledones. 88. Compositae. Revisio generum
plantarum 1 : 344.
MERXMULLER, H. 1967. Asteraceae. Prodromus einer Flora von
Siidwestafrika 139: 99.
P.P.J. HERMAN*
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria.
MS. received: 1998-04-09.
AMARYLLIDACAE: AMARYLLIDEAE
A NEW SPECIES OF AMARYLLIS FROM THE RICHTERSVELD, SOUTH AFRICA
INTRODUCTION
With a taxonomic history of just over 350 years, the
monotypic genus Amaryllis L. is considered to be one of
South Africa’s most important and widely grown orna-
mental taxa (Ferrari 1633; Dyer 1955). Amaryllis bel-
ladonna L. is currently cultivated in many countries
throughout the world. In the wild, however, the species is
well documented as endemic to the Cape Floristic
Region, where it is restricted to the Western Cape (Bond
& Goldblatt 1984). The recent discovery of a large pop-
ulation of Amaryllis plants in the Richtersveld, a particu-
larly arid region of the Succulent Karoo Biome in the
remote northwestern Cape, consequently engendered a
great deal of surprise and focused attention on the need
for a taxonomic reassessment of the genus.
Leafing bulbs of the Richtersveld population were
first collected at Paradyskloof by Prof. N. du Plessis and
Prof. G. Delpierre in 1978, by Mr E.J. van Jaarsveld in
1993, and by the first author in 1996. The cultivated col-
lections maintained in the Kirstenbosch National Botanic
Garden nursery, however, have thus far failed to flower.
Flowers were first recorded in the wild by Mr J.
Domroch, a Richtersveld Park ranger, who presented the
second author with a single pressed flower in April 1996.
This collection was added to one year later when the sec-
ond author, while completing a floristic survey of the
Richtersveld National Park, found the population at
Paradyskloof flowering en masse. From the beautiful
pink dowers the plants were tentatively identified as an
Amaryllis , and this was later confirmed by the appear-
ance of the fruits. A systematic study of the population
Bothalia 28,2 ( 1998)
193
thereafter revealed several morphological features that
separate the geographically disjunt Richters veld plants
from A. belladonna. The plants are thus newly described
as A. paradisicola, an epithet which commemorates the
species’ place of origin.
The discovery of this new species marks the first
record of a wild Amaryllis outside the Cape Floristic
Region and adds an extra, exceptionally ornamental rep-
resentative to the 363 taxa already known as unique to
the Gariep Centre of endemism (Nordenstam 1969;
Hilton-Taylor 1996).
Amaryllis paradisicola Snijman , sp. nov., A. bella-
donnae L. affinis sed foliis latioribus, 70-130 x 350-500
mm; pilis brevibus patentibus in superficiebus ambabus
foliorum saltern ubi juvenibus; floribus roseis concol-
oris; staminibus interioribus manifeste longioribus quam
exterioribus; stigmate profunde trifido ramis gracilibus
patentibus maturitate usque ad 1.5-2. 5 mm longis.
Figurae 11 & 12.
TYPE. — Northern Cape, 2817 (Vioolsdrif): Richters-
veld National Park, Paradyskloof, on rocky slopes,
(-AC), 11-4-1997, Snijman 1576 (NBG, holo.; K, KMG,
PRE).
Deciduous bulbous herbs, up to 800 mm tall when
flowering and fruiting. Bulbs solitary or sometimes clus-
tered, large, ovoidal, ± 100 x 140 mm. without a narrow
neck, sometimes more than half exposed above ground;
tunics numerous, cream-coloured, papery, producing
extensible threads when tom. Leaves 6-9, hysteranthous,
distichous, suberect when emerging, spreading and
apparently rosulate when mature; blade ligulate when
young to Ungulate when mature, up to 70-130 x
350-500 mm, somewhat channelled, more or less thin-
textured, bright green, covered with short patent hairs on
both surfaces at least while developing, producing copi-
ous brown sap when cut and numerous extensible threads
when torn; abaxial surface with a prominent midrib; mar-
gins sometimes slightly thickened, reddened and undu-
late, at least when young. Inflorescence upright; scape
solid, stout, succulent, 20-40 x 480-800 mm, somewhat
compressed, slightly ancipitous, glaucous-green, reddish
brown proximally, smooth, withering after seed disper-
sal; spathe valves 2, papery and reflexed at anthesis,
20-25 x 50-55 mm; bracteoles numerous, flattened, up
to 2 x 50 mm. Flowers 10-21, trumpet-shaped, with fun-
nel 30-40 mm long, 15-20 mm wide at throat, 70-80
mm wide at rim, in an evenly spreading, umbel-like clus-
ter, uniformly pink, without contrasting colours in veins
or throat, turning darker pink with age, scented; pedicels
evenly spreading, firm, 3-5 x 30-70 mm at anthesis,
elongating to 250 mm in fruit, mostly subterete but
slightly triangular in cross section below developing
fruit. Tepals free, broadly lanceolate, 12-20 x 65-80
mm, slightly recurved apically. Stamens declinate, short-
er than tepals, biseriate; filaments stout, pale pink, basal-
ly fused and adnate to perigone for ± 7 mm; outer whorl
FIGURE 1 1 . — Amaryllis paradisico-
la: A, flowering plants in
habitat; B, C, scape and
flower head; D, flower head
showing lateral view of
exserted trifid stigma.
194
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 12. — Amaryllis paradisico-
la: A, mature fruiting head; B,
bulb in habitat during fruiting
showing scape, young leaves
and basal bulblet; C, plants in
habitat showing mature hys-
teranthous leaves.
± 35 mm long; inner whorl ± 50 mm long, basally adnate
to perigone for up to ± 5 mm beyond tube; anthers ver-
satile, dorsifixed, curved, 7-9 mm long, yellow; pollen
yellow. Ovary green, trilocular, 5 mm across; ovules 4-6
per locule, axile; style declinate, ± 65 mm long, longer
than stamens, shorter than tepals, pale pink; stigma trifid
with spreading, slender branches up to 1.5-2. 5 mm long.
Capsule loculicidal, subglobose, 20-30 mm across,
leathery. Seeds fleshy, more or less ovoid, 12-17 mm
across, glossy, whitish to pink; embryo green.
Flowering, fruiting and vegetative phenology
The bulbs bloom in early April and the flowering peri-
od of the population lasts approximately ten days. When
A. paradisicola was collected in 1997, several hundred
bulbs had flowered after rain fell in March that year but
only two bulbs flowered at the same site during a pro-
longed dry autumn the following year. Flowering is thus
profuse after good autumn rain but poor when precipita-
tion in autumn is low. Despite the profusion of flowers in
1997, only a small number set seed and many infructes-
cences had been damaged, possibly by baboons. The
seeds take approximately one month to be released and
germinate after another three to four weeks. Although the
young leaves sometimes emerge at flowering time, the
foliage is mostly absent until the start of the winter rain-
fall season. The leaves grow rapidly in May and persist
until they dry off with the onset of the summer drought,
usually at the end of September.
Diagnostic features
Amaryllis paradisicola differs from A. belladonna in
having broad, tongue-shaped leaves, 70-130 x 350-500
mm, covered with short, patent hairs on both surfaces, at
least during their development. Although the hairs
become increasingly sparsely spaced as the leaf blades
enlarge, they remain evident under a hand lens in most
plants and are only rarely absent at maturity. Studies in
the field and of the herbarium material at NBG and BOL
indicated that populations of A. belladonna in the south-
ern Cape, the Agulhas Plain and the Cape Peninsula have
widely spreading, narrow leaves, 13-26 x 270-680 mm,
whereas the western populations from Saldanha and the
Cederberg have somewhat upright, slightly broader
leaves, 36-73 x 300-675 mm, that arise from an elon-
gated basal sheath, 110-300 mm long. The leaves of A.
belladonna are therefore perceptibly longer and narrow-
er than those of A. paradisicola while the leaf surfaces
are consistently glabrous, even when young.
Leaf surface pubescence in the form of soft hairs is
rare in the family. Softly pubescent leaves is a derived
character state in Amaryllideae and is so far known only
in Hessea Herb, and Strumaria Jacq. (subtribe Amaryl-
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
195
lidinae) but must now be considered for Amaryllis , the
basal genus in subtribe Amaryllidinae (Snijman & Lin-
der 1996). Similar leaf surface pubescence also occurs
sporadically in Haemanthus L. and Gethyllis L. (tribe
Haemantheae sensu Dahlgren et al. 1985) and Pancra-
tium L. (tribe Pancratieae).
Amaryllis paradisicola is furthermore distinguished
by several floral characters, of which flower colour and
stigma shape are most diagnostic. The 10-21 -flowered
A. paradisicola is slightly more floriferous than A. bel-
ladonna, which has 6-12 or occasionally 21 flowers, per
inflorescence; and the tepals, although darkening with
age, are uniformly pink, without the cream to lemon-yel-
low perigone throat of A. belladonna. The inner stamens
relative to the outer stamens vary from 10 mm longer to
almost equally long in A. belladonna , whereas the inner
stamens of the new species exceed the outer stamens by
15 mm or more. Lastly, the mature stigma of A. paradis-
icola is distinctly trifid with slender, spreading branches
that reach up to 1.5-2. 5 mm long when mature, unlike
the broader (up to 2 mm across), minutely trifid stigma
of A. belladonna. Although not as strongly scented, the
flowers of both species smell somewhat like those of
Narcissus.
Distribution, habitat and phytogeography
Amaryllis paradisicola is endemic to the Richtersveld
National Park, an arid, mountainous region in the North-
ern Cape. Here the species is known from a single large
population in Paradyskloof, a narrow gorge overlooking
a perennial pool along a tributary of the Abiekwa River
between Hottentotsparadys and Paradysberg. The bulbs
grow on south and east-facing, quartzitic cliffs, on nar-
row rock ledges and partially vegetated screes that are
shaded for much of the day. If the locality is not patrol-
led, the population may be endangered by unscrupulous
bulb collectors and by the large numbers of goats that
gather to drink in Paradyskloof.
The discovery of A. paradisicola extends the distrib-
ution of the genus Amaryllis approximately 450 km
beyond the Olifants River Valley mountains in the
Western Cape, where the most northerly populations of
A. belladonna are thus far known (Figure 13).
Other endemics of the Gariep Centre that occur at
Paradyskloof include three geophytes: Cyrtanthus herrei
(Leighton) R.A.Dyer, Bulbine pendens G.Will. & Baij-
nath, and an as yet unnamed Spiloxene species; also the
Paradise Toad, Bufo robinsonii Branch & Braack (1995).
The highly disjunct distribution pattern in Amaryllis
is repeated in several other geophytic genera.
Cyrtanthus herrei is confined to the Gariep Centre
whereas C. carneus (Reid & Dyer 1984) is found only in
the southwestern Cape; furthermore Moraea garipensis
and M. namaquamontana are narrowly restricted in the
Gariep Centre and M. ramosissima occurs only in the
Cape (Goldblatt 1986). Since the species in all three
genera are putative sister taxa, they probably represent
vicariants of previously widespread ancestral taxa.
Methods are not yet available to determine the age of
these species. Speciation may date from the advent of
FIGURE 13. — Known distributions of Amaryllis paradisicola, ★; and
A. belladonna, •, based on collections at BOL, PRE and NBG.
summer aridity and winter rainfall conditions in the
Pliocene (Tankard & Rogers 1978) or from the great cli-
matic fluctuations of the Pleistocene (Deacon 1983;
Tyson 1986). In particular, preliminary palynological
data from spring deposits at Eksteenfontein in the
Richtersveld showed a marked change from predomi-
nantly Chenopodiaceae-Amaranthaceae and different
Asteraceae pollen in the Late Pleistocene (before 10 700
BP) to assemblages totally dominated by pollen of the
succulent Aizoaceae-Mesembryanthemaceae type in the
early Holocene, 10 700-8 450 years BP (Scott et al.
1995). A tentative interpretation of this data is that it
reflects change from cooler to warmer conditions (Scott
et al. 1997). If this is correct, the mountains from the
Richtersveld to the Cape may have provided suitable
habitats for a widespread ancestral taxon in Amaryllis at
least during the Late Pleistocene. However, when the
available moisture reached its present level in the early
Holocene, populations in the Cape Region were proba-
bly ecologically isolated from those in the Gariep Centre
and thus diverged. We hypothesise that A. belladonna
radiated widely in the southwestern Cape, where it
became adapted to frequent disturbance by fire, where-
as A. paradisicola became narrowly restricted to rela-
tively cool, moist montane habitats in the otherwise arid
Richtersveld, where it evolved xerophilous, pubescent
leaves.
NORTHERN CAPE. — 2817 (Vioolsdrif): Richtersveld National
Park, Paradyskloof, (-AC), Snijman 1550 (NBG), Snijman 1576 (K,
KMG, NBG, PRE), Snijman 1578 (K, KMG, NBG, PRE), Williamson
5904 (NBG).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The National Parks Board kindly granted permission
to collect specimens of A. paradisicola in the Rich-
tersveld National Park. Mrs F. Williamson assisted in the
field, Mr A. de Villiers provided information on seed ger-
mination, and Dr J.C. Paterson-Jones kindly supplied the
original colour slides for Figures 11 & 12.
196
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
REFERENCES
BOND, P & GOLDBLATT, P. 1984. Plants of the Cape Flora. Journal
of South African Botany Suppl. Vol. 13: 1-455.
BRANCH, W R. & BRAACK, H.H. 1995. A new toad from paradise.
Madoqua 19: 15-23.
DAHLGREN, R.M.T., CLIFFORD, H.T. & YEO, PF. 1985. The fami-
lies of the monocotyledons. Springer- Verlag, Berlin.
DEACON, H.J. 1983. Another look at the Pleistocene climates of
South Africa. South African Journal of Science 79: 325-328.
DYER, R.A. 1955. Amaryllis belladonna. The Flowering Plants of Afri-
ca 30: t. 1200.
FERRARI, G. 1633. Deflorum cultura libri IV: t. 121. Rome.
GOLDBLATT, P 1986. The moraeas of southern Africa. Annals ofKir-
stenbosch Botanic Garden 14: 1-224.
HILTON-TAYLOR, C. 1996. Patterns and characteristics of the flora of
the Succulent Karoo Biome, southern Africa. In L.J.G. van der
Maesen, X.M. van der Burgt & J.M. van Medenbach de Rooy,
The biodiversity of African plants. Proceedings XIVth AETFAT
Congress. August 1994. Wageningen, Netherlands: 58-72. Kluwer
Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
NORDENSTAM, B. 1969. Phytogeography of the genus Euryops (Com-
positae). A contribution to the phytogeography of southern
Africa. Opera Botanica 23: 1-77.
REID, C. & DYER, R.A. 1984. A review of the southern African
species of Cyrtanthus. American Plant Life Society, La Jolla,
California.
SCOTT, L„ ANDERSON, H.M. & ANDERSON, J.M 1997. Vegeta-
tion history. In R.M. Cowling, D.M. Richardson & S.M. Pierce,
Vegetation of southern Africa: 62-84. Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge.
SCOTT, L„ STEENKAMP, M. & BEAUMONT, PB. 1995. Palaeo-
environments in South Africa at the Pleistocene-Holocene tran-
sition. Quaternary Science Reviews 14: 937-947.
SNIJMAN, D A. & LINDER, H P 1996. Phylogenetic relationships,
seeds characters, and dispersal system evolution in Ama-
ryllideae (Amaryllidaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical
Garden 83: 362-386.
TANKARD, A.J. & ROGERS, J. 1978. Late Cenozoic palaeo-environ-
ments on the west coast of southern Africa. Journal of Bio-
geography 5: 319-337.
TYSON, P.D. 1986. Climatic change and variability in southern
Africa. Oxford University Press, Cape Town
D A. SNIJMAN* AND G. WILLIAMSON**
* Compton Herbarium, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X7,
7735 Claremont, Cape Town.
** Research Associate, Bolus Herbarium, University of Cape Town,
7700 Rondebosch, Cape Town.
MS. received: 1998-05-27.
Bothalia 28,2: 197-211 (1998)
A reconnaissance survey of the vegetation of the North Luangwa
National Park, Zambia
P.P. SMITH*
Keywords: Luangwa Valley, vegetation description, vegetation mapping. Zambia
ABSTRACT
A comprehensive survey of the vegetation of the North Luangwa National Park (NLNP) was earned out over a period
of two years. The main aims of the survey were to describe the major vegetation communities in the park and to produce a
vegetation map of the NLNP
Initial differentiation of vegetation units was established by the appearance of the vegetation on aerial photographs.
Further information was derived from 353 ground plots in which > 20 000 woody plants were identified and measured.
Thirteen broad vegetation types were recognised in the NLNP. Details of their physiognomy, species composition, distrib-
ution, topography and edaphic associations are given.
INTRODUCTION
Until the present study, no detailed vegetation survey
of Zambia’s North Luangwa National Park (NLNP) had
been carried out. Naylor et al. (1973) and Phiri (1989)
have described the vegetation of the Luangwa valley, but
in both of these surveys, the area covered is too large and
the classification too broad to be useful to park man-
agers. The most detailed study of the region available is
that of Astle et al. (1969), who surveyed the South
Luangwa National Park, the North Luangwa National
Park east of the Muchinga Escarpment, and surrounding
areas. Habitat classification in this study was based on
physiognomic units recognised in a series of landsystems
representing all of the topographic units present in the
survey area.
The close relationship between vegetation, climate,
landsystems, edaphic factors is well established (Cole
1982; Bell 1984), and the rationale for producing a veg-
etation-based habitat classification of the NLNP was
founded on the premise that vegetation is a readily iden-
tifiable and measurable facet of habitat (Timberlake et al.
1993). In the long term, the vegetation boundaries desig-
nated in this study will form part of a geographical infor-
mation system for the NLNP, together with soil, geolog-
ical, hydrological, topographical and other information
which, combined, will help define habitats for individual
species. Justification for studying the vegetation compo-
nent of habitat as a first step is that a vegetation type is
readily discemable to managers and park personnel, peo-
ple who are not necessarily plant ecologists. Descriptions
based on vegetation physiognomy (e.g. woodland, wood-
ed grassland, thicket) and four or five characteristic
species should be recognisable to all.
As well as providing a valuable basis for habitat
description and monitoring, floristic data are a useful
measure of biological diversity. Conservation resources
* The Herbarium, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey,
TW9 3AB, UK
MS. received: 1997-04-29.
are scarce in Zambia, as in most developing countries,
and as a signatory to the Convention on Biological
Diversity, Zambia is committed to conserving as much of
her biological resource as possible. Clearly, a rational
approach to conservation needs to be devised in which
limited financial and technical resources can be used to
maximum benefit. An essential first step is to carry out a
biological resource assessment (Article 7a of the
Convention) with the aim of identifying areas of high
biodiversity for priority protection. Zambia has set aside
63 585 km2 (8.5%) of its total land mass as national park
and a further 10% is designated as forest reserve. All of
these areas require protection, but only a fraction have
been subjected to biological inventory. Without such
basic inventory, monitoring (Article 7b), identification of
adverse processes (7c) and maintenance or management
(7d) of the biodiversity resource is impossible. Due to its
great topographical diversity, North Luangwa National
Park is potentially one of the most biologically diverse of
Zambia’s protected areas. The results of the present study
will help to confirm this and will form baseline data
against which future trends in plant diversity can be mea-
sured.
This paper describes the major vegetation types pre-
sent in the NLNP, and presents a vegetation map of the
park. A comprehensive checklist of the plants collected
during this study is published elsewhere (Smith 1998).
STUDY AREA
The North Luangwa National Park (NLNP) is the
most northerly national park in Zambia’s Luangwa
Valley (Figure 1). It covers an area of 4 636 km2
(between ll°25' S to 12°20' S and 31°45' E to 32°40' E)
and is situated entirely on the west bank of the Luangwa
River, which forms its eastern boundary. In the west, the
park boundary incorporates part of the Muchinga
Escarpment which constitutes approximately 24% (1113
km2) of the park’s area. The northern boundary of the
park is formed by the Lufila River, while in the south, the
NLNP is bordered by the Munyamadzi corridor.
198
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
RIVER
HABITAT
A1/F2 Valley riverine complex
B1 Mixed alluvial thicket
B2 Combretum thicket
C1/C2 Escarpment miombo woodlands
JjJ C2 Hill miombo woodlands
| C2/D1 Woodland mosaic
D1 Combretum-Terminalia woodland
] D2/E/C2 Wooded grassland mosaic
I ] D2/E Woodland/wooded grassland mosaic
E Mopane woodland and scrub woodland
FI Secondary grassland on alluvium
F2 Valley riverine grassland
FIGURE 1. — The vegetation of the North Luangwa National Park, Zambia. Scale approx. 1 : 900 000.
Karoo System (Permian) sedimentary rocks form the
dominant strata of the valley floor while the escarpments
to the east and west of the Luangwa valley are made up
of igneous (e.g. granite) and/or metamorphic (e.g. gneiss
and quartzite) rocks (Utting 1976). In the NLNP, the ele-
vation of the Luangwa River and its adjacent floodplain
is ± 600 m. Topographical relief in this region is only a
few metres. Further west, but still on the valley floor, the
terrain becomes more dissected (relief 5-50 m) and the
elevation rises to between 700 and 800 m. In the far
western areas of the park the Muchinga Mountains rise
600-700 m above the valley floor, with the highest peaks
within the National Park reaching between 1 200 and
1 300 m. In this area the terrain is deeply dissected with
a relief of 500-600 m.
The valley receives a moderate rainfall of between
700 mm and 900 mm per annum, the wet season extend-
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
199
ing from November through to April. At higher altitudes,
on the Muchinga Escarpment and plateau, rainfall is cor-
respondingly higher [mean for the plateau (Mpika),
1 065 mm].
No comprehensive study of the soils of the Luangwa
valley has yet been carried out. However, in their land
classification study of the South Luangwa National Park
(SLNP), Astle et al. (1969) described and mapped the
heterogeneous soil types of the park according to their
association with the vegetation. Soil types range from the
deep, red sandy loams of the upper escarpment to the
alluvial sands and clays of the Luangwa floodplain.
The NLNP forms part of the Zambezian Regional
Centre of Endemism (White 1983) and. due to its great
topographical diversity, it probably possesses a greater
range of habitats than any other park in Zambia. In the
higher (800-1 200 m) deeply dissected terrain of the
Muchinga Mountains, miombo woodland predominates,
while in the lower (600-700 m) nearly flat valley
regions, mopane woodland is the dominant vegetation
type. Fire (Naylor et al. 1973) and elephant damage
(Caughley 1976) have been the most influential factors
affecting vegetation in the NLNP in recent years.
METHODS
Site selection and data collection
The approach employed for this survey was essential-
ly inductive, with the primary aim being vegetation
description rather than analysis (Kent & Coker 1992). As
a first step, the vegetation of the park was stratified
according to its macroscopic appearance, and subse-
quently systematic ground survey was used to provide
descriptive detail.
Initial differentiation of vegetation units was carried
out using aerial photographs and aerial survey. In this
procedure, panchromatic aerial photographs of the
NLNP (1983, scale 1: 34 000) were used to delineate nat-
ural vegetation boundaries. Interpretation of the air-
photo mosaic was carried out in order to define areas
homogeneous in tone and texture, corresponding to
homogeneous vegetation types. Thus, physiognomic
units (woodland, bushland, grassland etc.) were differen-
tiated and marked on the aerial photographs. Air-photo
information was validated and augmented by aerial sur-
vey. Homogeneous areas of vegetation (and to a certain
extent, their composition) were identified by an observer
and positions were recorded using a Garmin inboard
Geographical Positioning System (GPS). A total of 116
points were recorded in a systematic transect survey and
a further 105 points were recorded on other aeroplane
and helicopter flights over the park.
In the second part of the survey, floristic and physiog-
nomic vegetation data were collected in ground studies.
Physiognomic classification followed White (1983)
(Table 1). A total of 353 belt transects were located with-
in the vegetation types defined in the air-photo mosaic.
Placement of transects was not random as an effort was
made to cover as many vegetation units (homogeneous
areas defined on the aerial photographs) as possible.
Other considerations were accessibility and avoidance of
ecotones and atypical landscape features e.g. termite
mounds, tracks, roads (Walker 1976). Transect positions
were determined using a portable GPS (Magellan 5000).
Standard transects measured 50 x 5 m (= 250 m2), rec-
tangular plots being chosen for ease of sampling and to
maximise species diversity (Brown 1954; Condit et al.
1996). Transects incorporated a minimum of 50 trees/
shrubs or at least 15 specimens of a dominant species.
Where these criteria were not met, transects were broad-
ened or lengthened accordingly (Taylor & Walker 1978).
Within each transect, woody plants (> 1 m in height) were
identified, counted and measured (diameter at breast
height and estimated height). Herbs and grasses were
collected and/or noted at all transect sites.
Samples of all plant species recorded were collected,
pressed and dried. Identifications were carried out in
herbaria in Lusaka, Kitwe, Harare and Kew. Nomenclature
follows Flora zambesiaca, Flora of tropical East Africa and
Lebrun & Stork (1991-1997). Voucher specimens are
lodged at the Kew, Missouri and Mount Makulu herbaria. A
full checklist of the plants collected in the NLNP is pub-
lished elsewhere (Smith 1998).
In addition to the vegetation survey, a limited soil sur-
vey of the NLNP was carried out and the resulting soil
types were related to the plant communities defined
above. In order to include the main vegetation types, soil
pits were dug beside a vehicle track which transects the
park, from Mano Game Scout Camp ( 11°37' S, 32°02' E)
on the Muchinga Escarpment in the west, to the Luangwa
River ( 1 1 °5 1 ' S, 32°26' E) in the east. Additional pits
were dug between 1 1 °37' S, 32°30' E and 1 1 °33' S,
32°25' E along a cutline parallel to the Lufila River. Soil
pits (2 m deep) were dug at ± 2 km intervals within 5-10
m of the track. Soil profiles were measured and pho-
tographed and a soil sample (200 g) from each horizon
was placed in a plastic bag and retained for further analy-
sis. The displaced soil was returned to the pit and the sur-
face levelled in an attempt to minimise disturbance to the
site. Retained soil samples were measured for colour,
texture and pH. Colour was determined using Munsell
Soil Colour Charts (1949). Soil texture (stoniness, shape
of peds, structure, consistency and roots) was described
according to Courtney & Trudgill (1988); sand, silt and
TABLE 1 . — Physiognomic classification of vegetation from White
(1983)
200
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
clay content of the soil was determined using the
hydrometer method (Pramer & Schmidt 1964). Finally,
the pH of the soil was recorded using a Kel soil tester (for
acidity and soil moisture).
Data analysis and interpretation
Ground study provided detailed information on vege-
tation structure and composition. Thus, for each vegeta-
tion unit delineated from the aerial photographs, it was
possible to: 1, list plant species; 2, calculate tree/shrub
density, expressed as n ha'1 (Brown 1954); 3, calculate
woody biomass, expressed as t ha'1 using the following
formulae developed in similar habitats in Sengwa,
Zimbabwe by Guy (1981):
Tree biomass (Kg) = 0.0549 x (diameter at breast height)25101
Shrub biomass (Kg) = 1.2102 x (canopy volume)0-9118
4, determine dominant species by calculation of impor-
tance values (Curtis & McIntosh 1951) for each species
according to the formula:
Importance value = relative frequency + relative density
+ relative dominance
Ground study data permitted further division of vege-
tation units according to the floristic criteria above and
the environmental information collected from each plot
(altitude, soil type, topography).
Vegetation types were described in terms of their typ-
ical vegetation structure, characteristic woody species,
associated grass and herb species, soils, geology, topog-
raphy, distribution and area covered.
Map production
A preliminary working vegetation map of the NLNP was
derived from the 1983 panchromatic aerial photographs.
Transparent overlays marked with the vegetation bound-
aries delineated on the aerial photographs were reduced
from a scale of 1 : 34 000 to a scale of 1 : 250 000 on a pho-
tocopier (Xerox U.K. Ltd). This reduction was then super-
imposed onto the 1 : 250 000 UTM Ordnance Survey maps
of the NLNP (no. SD-36-2 and SC-36- 14) and redrawn.
This rough map was used as a working image upon which
ground survey could be based.
A second more accurate, more detailed and up to date
vegetation map (scale 1:100 000) was produced from a
partial scene (90 x 90 km) LANDSAT TM satellite
image (Band 4, 7th July 1995), georeferenced and
geocoded to UTM map projection (Satellite Applications
Centre, Pretoria). The image was supplied by SAC as
digital data (EOSAT Fast Format) on CD-ROM, which
was processed into a photographic image (Hunting
Technical Services, UK) upon which vegetation bound-
aries could be marked by hand. The vegetation types
delineated on this image were assigned according to the
aerial and ground survey results presented below and the
end result is a map incorporating 1 1 broad vegetation
types and in which vegetation mosaics are indicated
(Figure 1). This map was digitised using PC ARC/INFO
(Kent Cassells, DICE, UK) and incorporated into the
beginnings of a Geographical Information System (GIS)
for the NLNP. More detailed vegetation data, as well as
information about geology, topography, water relations,
plant-animal interactions, etc. can all be incorporated
into this database in the future in order to build up a more
complete picture of the park ecosystem.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
During this study, the vegetation of the NLNP was
stratified into six floristic classes, divided into 13 distinct
vegetation types. Vegetation type distributions are shown
in Figure 1, with the exception of types A2 and F3, the
areas of which are too small to be shown at this scale.
The vegetation descriptions below are largely based
upon quantitative tree/shrub data from sample sites. The
herbaceous component is described from qualitative data
and collection material. Further division of vegetation
types into subtypes is based on substrate. A detailed
description of all vegetation types and subtypes is given
below. Key characteristics of woody vegetation types are
given in Table 2.
A. RIPARIAN FORESTS. WOODLANDS AND THICKET
This vegetation class comprises moist forests to
woodlands and thicket fringing perennial and seasonal
watercourses. At lower altitudes (600-700 m) valley
riverine fringe vegetation takes the form of woodland
(usually with a well-developed shrub layer), and thicket.
It should be noted that even on the valley’s perennial
rivers (Luangwa, Lufila and Mwaleshi), fringe woodland
and thicket is discontinuous, being interspersed with
other vegetation types such as riverine grassland (F2)
and/or non-riverine vegetation types. This is even more
noticeable on seasonal watercourses where fringe river-
ine trees are usually mingled with trees and shrubs char-
acteristic of adjacent vegetation types. At higher altitudes
(800-1 300 m), on the Muchinga Escarpment, riverine
fringe vegetation takes the form of dense evergreen for-
est which, on the larger watercourses, may extend to
adjacent swampy areas. This vegetation type tends to be
well developed and distinctive (although narrow) even
on the smaller, seasonal watercourses.
Valley riverine woodland (Al), as described in the pre-
sent study, is readily recognisable in the Luangwa valley
surveys of Astle et al. (1969), Naylor et at. (1973) and Phiri
(1989) (Table 3). Escarpment riverine forest (A2) however,
is not described in detail in any of the above studies but is
covered thoroughly by Fanshawe (1971). Vegetation type
A2 contains elements of Fanshawe’s ‘Riparian forest’ (p.
34) and ‘Swamp forest’ (p. 32).
Al . Valley riverine woodland and thicket
The Luangwa River lies at an altitude of ± 600 m and
topographical relief is only a few metres. The large trib-
utaries of the Luangwa in the NLNP are the Lufila,
Mwaleshi and Mulandashi Rivers. These rivers emerge
from the Muchinga Escarpment in the west at an altitude
of between 700 and 800 m. Topographical relief along
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
201
TABLE 2. — Summary of woody vegetation data in the NLNP from aerial and ground survey results
* Data not available, due to the discontinuous nature of A1 Valley riverine woodland and thicket.
these watercourses varies from as much as 5-50 m near
the escarpment to only a few metres at the Luangwa con-
fluences.
Valley riverine woodland and thicket is associated
with the rich, recently deposited alluvial soils which he
adjacent to the rivers of the valley floor. This alluvial belt
may only be a few metres wide or, along the Luangwa
and its major tributaries, may extend many hundreds of
metres from the river. Riverine valley soils show consid-
erable diversity and cannot be assigned to any one soil
class. In general, these are deep, stoneless, clearly strati-
fied soils which vary in texture from sands to clays (see
vegetation type F2). Soil pH is usually around neutral but
ranges from pH 5.6 to pH 6.9. Soil colour varies from
light yellow brown to dark grey.
The fringe woodland of the valley’s perennial and sea-
sonal rivers is generally two-storeyed in structure, with
canopy trees reaching 20 m or higher and a well-devel-
oped shrub layer, which may extend to form areas of
bushland or thicket. Characteristic tall trees include
Kigelia africana, Diospyros mespiliformis, Trichilia
emetica, Lonchocarpus capassa, Colophospermum
mopane, Combretum imberbe, Faidherbia albida,
Sclerocarya birrea and Tamarindus indica (invariably
associated with termitaria). Other less frequent but typi-
cal large trees include Breonadia salicina and Khaya
nyasica. Commonly occurring small trees and shrubs are
Piliostigma thonningii , Ziziphus abyssinica, Oncoba spi-
nosa, Feretia aeruginescens, Flueggea virosa, Anti-
desma venosum, Phyllanthus reticulatus, Acacia sieberi-
ana and A. polyacantha subsp. campy lac antha. Amongst
the thicket-forming shrubs, the genus Combretum is well
represented: C. obovatum (on clay), C. fragrans and C.
imberbe (as a shrub) are all common. C. fragrans may
form areas of bushland in which it is the single dominant
species. Other frequent thicket-forming species are
Diospyros senensis (on sand), Keetia zanzibarica and
Friesodielsia obovata. Climbers in this vegetation type
include Jasminum fluminense, Abrus precatorius and
Dregea macrantha. The grass layer associated with well-
developed fringe woodland or thicket is sparse and con-
fined to shade-loving species such as Panicum maximum,
Phyllorachis sagittata and Setaria homonyma. Herbs
typical of the stratified soils of the larger rivers of the
valley floor include Senna obtusifolia, Indigofera tincto-
ria , Sida alba , Vernonia glabra and spp., Duosperma
spp., Corchorus spp. and Ocimum spp.
On the major rivers such as the Luangwa, Lufila,
Mwaleshi and Mulandashi, vegetation type A1 occurs in
a substrate-dependent mosaic with the riverine herba-
ceous habitats described in vegetation type F2.
A2. Escarpment riverine forest
This forest is found fringing the rivers and streams of
the Muchinga Mountains in the west of the NLNR
Elevation ranges from 800-1 300 m and the terrain is
deeply dissected with relief measured in hundreds of
metres. The igneous/metamorphic geology of the Mu-
202
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
TABLE 3. — Comparison of vegetation classifications of the Luangwa valley in past and present surveys
* not applicable.
chinga Escarpment means that many of its rivers pass
through rocky terrain (granite, quartzite) and waterfalls
are common.
Soils associated with this vegetation type are very
variable in texture and tend to be alluvial on the valley
bottoms and colluvial on the valley sides.
On the Muchinga Escarpment, rivers and streams are
bounded by dense, usually 3-storeyed evergreen forest
(known as Mushitu in CiBemba) which may extend to
adjacent swampy areas. The canopy is closed and the
trees from which it is formed may be 20 m or more in
height. Characteristic tall trees in this vegetation type
include Syzygium cordatum, Breonadia salicina, Clei-
stanthus polystachyus, S. guineense subsp. afromon-
tanum, Uapcica lissopyrena, U. sansibarica and Apo-
dytes dimidiata. Other less frequent, but characteristic
large trees include Parkia fdicoideci, Sapium ellipticum,
Tabernaemontana pachysiphon and Xylopia rubescens.
Monopetalanthus trapnellii is locally common on the
Mwaleshi River and can form extensive stands of forest
in which it is the single dominant species. Characteristic
understorcy species are Antidesma vogelianum, Engle-
rophytum magalismontanum, Craterispermum schwein-
furthii, Faurea saligna, Garcinia smeathmannii and
Berscimci abyssinica. Shrubs include Diospyros natalen-
sis, Rothmannia whitfieldii, Cremaspora triflora, Rhus
longipes, Tricalysia coriacea, Lasianthus kilimandschar-
icus and Erythroxylum emarginatum. Climbers typical of
this habitat are Carissa edulis, Sabicea laurentii, Smilax
anceps, Phyllanthus muelleranus, Clematis welwitschii,
Artabotrys spp. and Strychnos spp. Oxytenanthera bam-
boo is locally common on escarpment streams and rivers.
Where A2 fringing forest is a narrow belt of riparian
trees, grasses and herbs associated with dambo margins
occur (see F3). Common grass species include Loudetia
simplex, Trachypogon spicatus , Cleistachne sorghoides.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
203
Hyparrhenici spp., Pennisetum spp. and Setaria spp.
Characteristic subshrubs and herbs are Acalypha
chirindica, Urena lob at a. Polygala exelliana, Phaidopsis
imbricata, Droogmansia pteropus, Helichrysum spp.,
Tinnea spp. and Dissotis spp. Where riparian forest
extends into seasonally flooded swamp forest, or
Monopetalanthus forest, the forest floor is carpeted with
moss, and ferns are common ( Asplenium , Adiantum,
Pellaea). Epiphytes may also occur. Herbs in this habitat
include Geophila obvallata, Schwartzkopffia lastii ,
Leptactina benguellensis and Biophytum spp. Sclerochi-
ton vogellii is locally common in Monopetalanthus for-
est.
B. BUSHLANDS AND THICKET
Both vegetation types described below are characterised
by thicket species which form closed stands. However, in
some places more open stands occur and therefore vegeta-
tion types B 1 and B2 are best regarded as mosaics of bush-
land and thicket. Both Mixed alluvial thicket (Bl) and
Combretum thicket (B2) are confined to the alluvial areas
adjacent to the valley's larger rivers (Luangwa, Mwaleshi).
Together, vegetation types Bl and B2 cover an area of
approximately 180 km2, and seem to occupy a niche on soils
of an intermediate nature between the low, poorly drained
clays of vegetation type FI and the higher, sandy soils of
vegetation type Dl. Mixed alluvial thicket is the character-
istic thicket vegetation type north of the Mwaleshi River,
while Combretum thicket largely occurs to the south of the
Mwaleshi. Both types are dominated by different species of
thicket-forming shrubs, but share many species in common.
The absence of C. elaeagnoides and C. celastroides in large
areas of Mixed alluvial thicket, north of the Mwaleshi River,
which led to the distinction being made in the present sur-
vey, is apparently a local phenomenon because these two
species do occur further north, on the Lufila River. The rea-
son for their absence in the middle of the park is unknown,
and requires further study.
Astle et al. (1969) make no distinction between
Mixed alluvial thicket (Bl) and Combretum thicket (B2),
referring to this vegetation type as ‘Thicket on freely
draining alluvium'. Their species list for this vegetation
type contains the dominant elements of both B 1 and B2.
B 1 . Mixed alluvial thicket
This vegetation type is found on the alluvial soils
associated with the Luangwa River in the east of the park
and is the characteristic thicket vegetation type north of
the Mwaleshi River. Elevation in this area is between 600
m and 625 m and the terrain undulates slightly with a
relief of only a few metres. This vegetation type is fre-
quently found in mosaic with Chloris-Dactyloctenium-
Echinochloa secondary grassland (FI) but occupies
higher ground and better drained, sandy soils so that
while the surrounding grassland becomes waterlogged
during the wet season, the areas of thicket remain com-
paratively dry.
Soils associated with this vegetation type are freely
draining and are typically pale brown to orange, stone-
less, sandy clay loams (60-75% sand) of slightly acid to
neutral pH (pH 6. 5-7.0).
Vegetation type B 1 comprises closed and open stands
of bushes 2-7 m high with occasional tall trees. Colo-
phospermum mopane is present to a greater or lesser
extent. It is found in clumps on patches of calcareous or
sodic clay soil but also as individual, usually tall trees
dotted throughout the habitat. Other occasional tall trees
include Xeroderris stuhlmannii, Pseudolachnostylis
maprouneifolia, Stereospermum kunthianum and Adan-
sonia digitata. Common smaller trees are Boscia angusti-
folia, Excoecaria bussei (also a shrub) Schrebera tri-
choclada and Diospyros quiloensis (occasionally a large
tree). Vegetation type Bl is dominated by the shrubs
Croton gratissimus, Friesodielsia obovata, Mundulea
sericea, Combretum obovatum, Vangueria infausta,
Markhamia obtusifolia and M. zanzibarica. Baphia mas-
saiensis is locally common. The grass and herb layer is
not well developed in Mixed alluvial thicket but contains
elements of vegetation types Dl, El and FI. Grasses
include Digit aria acuminatissima, Sporobolus cordo-
fanus , Urochloa mossambicensis, Dactyloctenium spp.
and Chloris spp. In the wetter sump areas, Brachiaria
deflexa, Sporobolus pyramidalis and Setaria spp. are
characteristic. Common herbs are Hibiscus cannabinus ,
H. calyphyllus, Cleome monophylla, C. hirta, Senna
absus, Blepharis tenniramea, Clerodendrum spp. and
Duosperma spp.
B2. Combretum thicket
This is the characteristic thicket type south of the
Mwaleshi River. Elevation is ± 600-620 m and the ter-
rain is flat with a relief of only a few metres. As with
Mixed alluvial thicket (Bl), Combretum thicket is found
on alluvial, sandy soils close to the Luangwa and Mwa-
leshi Rivers.
Vegetation type B2 is comprised of thicket-forming
shrubs, 2-7 m in height, which grow in a mosaic of
closed and open stands. The grass layer is not well devel-
oped. Tall trees are rare but species such as Manilkara
mochisia and Diospyros quiloensis may occur infre-
quently. Small trees found in Combretum thicket include
Schrebera trichoclada and Combretum collinum subsp.
gazense. The dominant shrubs are Combretum elaeag-
noides, C. celastroides, C. obovatum, Holarrhena pubes-
cens, Vangueria infausta and Markhamia spp. Grasses
and herbs associated with this habitat are the same as
those in vegetation type B 1.
C. MIOMBO WOODLANDS
The miombo woodlands of North Luangwa National
Park cover an area of approximately 1 300 km2. This is
the dominant vegetation type of the Muchinga Escarp-
ment and its attendant foothills, Chinshenda, Soma and
the Mvumvwe range. The vegetation described under the
umbrella of miombo woodlands is physiognomically
diverse, ranging from closed woodland to open wood-
land to scrub woodland. For the purposes of this classifi-
cation, miombo woodland in the NLNP has been divided
into two types, Cl Upper escarpment and C2 Lower
204
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
escarpment/hill miombo woodland, a division largely
based on floristic composition. Further division into sub-
types is dependent on substrate.
Miombo woodland is clearly recognised in all three
of the previous valley surveys (Table 3). Further de-
scriptions are available from Trapnell (1953) and from
Fanshawe ( 1971 ).
Cl. Brachystegia-Julbernardia-Isoberlima upper
escarpment and plateau miombo woodland
At elevations over 1 000 m, this is the most important
and extensive vegetation type of the Muchinga Escarp-
ment. It can be separated into three distinct vegetation
subtypes dictated by substrate. Subtype 1 occurs over
most of the upper escarpment, on deep laterite soils.
Subtype 2 is rare in the NLNP and is found in isolated
patches on shallower plateau soils. Subtype 3 is associat-
ed with the granite outcrops dotted throughout the
escarpment terrain.
Vegetation type Cl (subtype 1) corresponds to
Trapnell’s E and El types (Trapnell et al. 1950), which
occur on the deep soils of the escarpment, as evidenced
by the dominance of Brachystegia utilis and B. spici-
formis, species which cannot tolerate shallow soils
(Fanshawe 1971). The tall trees and comparatively
sparse grass layer seen in this vegetation type are proba-
bly due to the improved drainage and better soils associ-
ated with the dissected terrain (Cole 1963). In this vege-
tation type, laterite was more commonly found as nod-
ules in the B horizon rather than the impermeable layer
characteristic of the pediplain plateau soils (Cl subtype
2). Subtype 2 corresponds to Trapnell’s P4 type (Trapnell
et al. 1950), and Subtype 3 is described by White (1983)
as ‘Zambezian rupicolous bushland and thicket’.
Subtype 1. Upper escarpment miombo woodland', is the
dominant vegetation type of the upper Muchinga Escarp-
ment in the west of the NLNP, and is found at elevations
ranging from 1 000 to > 1 300 m over deeply dissected ter-
rain where relief is measured in hundreds of metres.
Subtype 1 is associated with deep, red, stoneless
sandy loams or sandy clays. These soils arc slightly acid
(pH 6. 6-7.0) and usually contain laterite nodules and
mica aggregates in the B horizon.
This woodland takes the form of a clearly two-
storeyed woodland witli an open to lightly closed canopy
of semi-evergreen trees 15-20 m high. Characteristic
canopy trees include Julbernardia paniculata, Brachy-
stegia spiciformis, B. utilis, Isoberlinia ahgolensis, Mar-
quesia macroura, Parinari curatellifolia, B. manga and
Pericopsis angolensis. Common lower storey trees are
Brachystegia stipulata, Uapaca kirkiana and spp.,
Craterosiphon quarrel, Phyllocosmos lemaireanus,
Memecylon flavovirens, Dalbergia nitidula, Combretum
zeyheri, B. longifolia, Anisophyllea pomifera, Diplo-
rhynchus condylocarpon and Pseuclolachnostylis ma-
prouneifolia. Frequent shrubs are Keetia gueinzii, K.
venosa, Rothmannia engleriana, Landolphia parvifolia
and Protea spp. Climbers are infrequent in this vegetation
type, Strophanthus welwitschii being a notable exception.
In upper escarpment miombo woodland, the grass layer is
sparse and generally restricted to scattered clumps of pre-
dominantly tall grasses. Common species are
Andropogon chinensis, A. schirensis, Anthephora elonga-
ta, Heteropholis sulcata, Loudetia simplex, Sporobolus
sanguineus and Trichopteryx fruticulosa. The herb layer
is sparse but varied. Pteridium aquilinum subsp. centrali-
africanum is locally common, and sedges such as
Ascolepis elata, Carex echinochloe subsp. nyasensis,
Bulbostylis spp., Cyperus spp. and Scleria spp. are found
in poorly drained areas. Frequent subshrubs are
Psychotria spithamea, P. eminiana, Indigofera emargin-
elloides, Tapiphyllum cinerascens , Desmodium barbatum
and Kotschya spp. Typical herbs include Costus
spectcibilis and Siphonochilus rhodesicus at the beginning
of the rains, followed by Thunbergia kirkiana , Endo-
stemon dissitifolius, Hybanthus enneaspermus , Otio-
phora scabra, Nidorella spartioides, Rhynchotropis pog-
gei, Aspilia spp., Becium spp., Spermacoce spp., Teph-
rosia spp. and Triumfetta spp.
Subtype 2. Plateau miombo woodland: occurs in isolat-
ed patches in the far west of the NLNP, and is associat-
ed with Hat terrain. Plateau soils tend to be shallow, poor
in nutrients and humus, slightly acid, and are typically
leached, with a laterite or gley horizon near the surface.
In contrast to upper escarpment miombo woodland,
plateau miombo woodland is of single storey structure
and is characterised by stunted Brachyste gia-Julber-
nardia, interspersed with Uapaca, Protect , Faureci and
Monotes species. In addition, the shrub and grass layers
are comparatively well developed, with Hyparrhenia
and Andropogon spp. predominant. This subtype occurs
on the comparatively shallow, infertile soils of the
plateau peneplain and over large areas of Zambia
appears to be secondary miombo woodland which has
been subjected to repeated fires and cultivation (Fan-
shawe 1971).
Subtype 3. Rupicolous miombo woodland : the rocky out-
crops and granite kopjes of the Muchinga Escarpment
support a distinctive vegetation type and although many
of the taxa listed above may occur, additional species
such as Brachystegia microphylla, Pterocarpus rotundi-
folius, Sclirebera trichoclada, Kirkia acuminata,
Landolphia parvifolia and Tarenna neurophylla are typi-
cal. Carphalea pubescens is a characteristic subshrub.
C2. Julbernardia-Brachystegia lower escarpment and
bill miombo woodland and scrub woodland
This woodland covers much of the lower Muchinga
Escarpment and its attendant foothills, Chinshenda,
Soma and the Mvumvwe range. It is also found on the
upper valley Boor where il may intergrade with vegeta-
tion types D I and D2.
Vegetation type C2 can be separated into two subtypes
according to substrate and vegetation physiognomy.
Subtype 1 is miombo scrub woodland, associated with
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
205
the thin, eroded, stony soils of the hill slopes. Subtype 2
is open woodland, found on the deeper soils of the inter-
fluves and flatter sites.
Vegetation type C2, subtype 1 (scrub woodland) is
recognised by Astle et al. (1969) who refer to it as
'Miombo scrub on shallow soils’. This type is also
described by White (1983), in a direct reference to the
Luangwa valley (p. 99). Fanshawe (1971), Naylor et al.
(1973) and Phiri (1989) all refer to this distinctive form of
miombo as ‘Scrub miombo woodland'. Vegetation type
C2, subtype 2 (woodland) is designated ‘Miombo wood-
land on deep soil' by Astle et al. (1969). Phiri ( 1989) cites
Brachystegia boehmii, B. bitssei, B. manga and Julber-
nardia globiflora as common taxa in this habitat.
Subtype 1. Brachystegia stipulata-Julbernardia globi-
flora miombo scrub woodland : occurs at elevations rang-
ing from 700-1 000 m and is the most extensive vegeta-
tion type of the lower Muchinga Escarpment, where it
occurs in mosaic with subtype 2. It also intergrades with
vegetation types D 1 and D2 on the upper valley floor.
Subtype 1 occurs on the shallow, slightly acid (pH
6. 6-6. 9) light grey to yellowish brown, generally stony
sandy clay loam soils (lithosols and shallow fersiallitic
soils) associated with the hill slopes of the lower escarp-
ment and foothills.
The vegetation takes the form of 3-5 m tall scrub
woodland, in which there are very few tall trees,
Brachystegia bussei being an infrequent exception. In this
habitat the vegetation is dominated by Julbemardia glob-
iflora, Brachystegia allenii and B. stipulata in stunted
form. B. manga is locally dominant on Chinshenda hill.
Other common small trees and shrubs are B. boehmii,
Diplorhynchus condylocarpon, Combretum zeyheri,
Pseudolachnostylis maprouneifolia and Monotes afri-
canus. The grass layer is sparse, but similar in composition
to that found in vegetation types Cl and D2. Typical grass-
es are Trichopteryx fruticulosa, Tristachya bequaertii,
Diheteropogon amplectens, Sporobolus myrianthus,
Andropogon spp. and Melinis spp. Common subshrubs
include Ochna leptoclada , O. richardsiae and Cypho-
stemma spp. Characteristic herbs are Chlorophytum rubri-
bracteatum , Ectadiopsis producta , Endostemon dissiti-
folius, Indigofera sutherlandoides, Justicia striata ,
Zygotritonia nyassana. Becium spp. and Commelina spp.
Subtype 2. Julbemardia-Brachystegia open miombo wood-
land: is found in the deeply dissected terrain of the lower
Muchinga Escarpment and its foothills, where it occurs in
mosaic with miombo scrub woodland (Subtype 1). It also
intergrades with the Combretaceae woodlands and wooded
grasslands, D1 and D2, on the upper valley floor.
Subtype 2 is found on the deep, yellowish brown
slightly acid, sandy soils associated with the hill tops and
ridges of the lower escarpment and foothills.
The vegetation takes the form of open woodland with
scattered tall trees (15-20 m) and a well-developed grass
layer, dominated by tall species. Shrub patches are occa-
sional. Characteristic tall trees include Burkea africana,
Julbemardia globiflora, Pericopsis angolensis and
Brachystegia allenii. Common small trees include
Brachystegia stipulata, Combretum zeyheri, C. psid-
ioides, Terminalia sericea, and Oldfieldia dactylophylla.
The shrub layer is reduced but includes Ozoroa insignis,
Diplorhynchus condylocarpon, Vernonia glaberrima and
Lannea discolor (also a small tree). Common grasses are
Andropogon chinensis, A. gayanus, A. schirensis , Hyparr-
henia anemopaegma, PI. filipendula, Hyperthelia disso-
luta and Tristachya superba. Like the grasses, the herb
component is related to that of vegetation types D 1 and
D2 (below); typical species include Acalypha allenii, A.
villicaulis, Barleria fulvostellata, Dicoma anomala, and
Agathisanthemum spp.
D. COMBRETACEAE WOODLAND AND WOODED GRASSLAND
This vegetation class is dominated by (distinct) spe-
cies of the genera Combretum and Terminalia. Both veg-
etation types described below have well-developed grass
layers.
Vegetation type Dl, Combretum-Terminalia wood-
land, closely resembles the ‘ Terminalia sericea tree savan-
na’ of Wild & Barbosa (1967). White (1983) refers to it as
'North Zambezian undifferentiated woodland’, comprising
miombo associates but not Brachystegia/ Julbemardia
species. Fanshawe (1971) groups this vegetation type
together with the miombo woodlands of the valley floor,
but refers to it as ‘ Erythrophleum woodland'. The classifi-
cation of the present survey is largely based on floristic
composition and our ground survey data strongly indicates
that vegetation type Dl does not fall into the miombo
class. Brachystegia/Julbernardia species do occur in the
ecotones where vegetation type C2 intergrades with
Combretum-Tenninalia woodland, but elsewhere they are
never dominant and over large areas of this woodland, par-
ticularly in the east, they do not occur at all. Astle et al.
(1969) and Phiri (1989) refer to this vegetation type as
‘ Terminalia sericea-Erythrophleum africanum woodland
savanna’ and ‘ Erythrophleum woodland’ respectively
(Table 3). This nomenclature can be related to our results
in that E. africanum is an important component of this
vegetation type. However, in the NLNP at least,
Combretum/ Terminalia species are more frequent, more
abundant and account for more woody biomass than E.
africanum. Like us, Naylor et al. (1973) refer to this veg-
etation type as ‘ Combretum-Terminalia woodland’.
Astle et al. (1969) classify vegetation type D2,
Combretum-Terminalia-Diospyros wooded grassland,
under ‘Miombo scrub on shallow soils’, although they do
make a topographic distinction between this habitat (3;1
and 5;1) and vegetation type C2 subtype 1 (4;2 and 8;1). In
Astle’s updated landsystem/vegetation map (Astle 1989) a
further land facet is added (landsystem 7; facet 6) in which
this vegetation type is described as: ‘semi-deciduous scrub-
land with local variation in species composition. A mopane
and Terminalia stenostachya association on the flatter sites,
Brachystegia stipulata, Combretum apiculatum, Julber-
nardia globiflora association in areas of greater relief.’
This is a landsystem description incorporating the floris-
tic mosaic described below, of which vegetation type D2
is the non-miombo component.
206
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
Dl. Combretum-Terminalia woodland
Vegetation type Dl is characterised by fire-tolerant,
sandy soil species (e.g. Terminalia sericea) and bears a
close resemblance to other high grass-woodland vegeta-
tion types such as the Burkea-Erythrophleum woodlands
of western Zambia and the Chipya woodlands of the
Bangweulu region (Trapnell et al. 1950). The common
herbaceous indicators of lake basin Chipya , Aframoinum
alboviolaceum, Smilax anceps and Pteridium aquilinum
are not a feature of this habitat, but like Chipya woodland
(Lawton 1978), it is probable that vegetation type Dl is
maintained by the fierce dry season fires which sweep
through the NLNP every year. Combretum-Terminalia
woodland is found in close association with thicket
(B1/B2), both vegetation types occupying a belt of deep,
sandy soil running parallel to the Luangwa River. The
relationship between thicket and woodland is not clear,
but it is possible that the two vegetation types are deter-
mined by edaphic factors. In certain (western) areas of
the park, this woodland intergrades with hill miombo
woodland (C2). It covers large areas of the valley floor
(180 knr in addition to 313 km2 in mosaic with vegeta-
tion type C2) over elevations ranging from 650 m to 700
m. It is generally associated with flat terrain where relief
is only up to 10 m.
Soils associated with this vegetation type are deep,
light brown to orange and are mildly acidic to neutral
(pH 6. 4-7.0). These soils are characterised by a very
high sand content (70-90%) and are probably colluvial
(or old alluvial) and derived from Karoo sandstone.
Combretum-Terminalia woodland takes the form of
open 1- or 2-storeyed deciduous woodland. Canopy spe-
cies may be up to 20 m tall. The grass layer is tall and
well developed. The tall trees found in this habitat are
dominated by Terminalia sericea (up to and above 15 m
high), Pseudolachnostylis maprouneifolia, Pericopsis
angolensis , Burkea africana, Erythrophleum africanum
and Amblygonocarpus andongensis. Common small
trees and shrubs are Combretum molle, C. collinum
subsp. gazense, C. zeyheri, Bridelia cathartica, Cros-
sopteryx febrifuga and Baphia massaiensis. On the deep
soils of this type, the grass layer is well developed with
both tall and short grasses. Common tall grasses are
Andropogon schirensis, A. gayanus, A. chinensis, Hy-
parrhenia anemopaegma, H. filipendula, Pogonarthria
squarrosa and Tristachya superba. Shorter species are
Aristida scabrivalvis, Digitaria gay ana, D. acuminatissi-
ma, Heteropogon contortus and Sporobolus festivus.
Characteristic subshrubs include Senna petersiana, Cissus
cornifolia and Euphorbia matabelensis. The herb compo-
nent is dominated by ground creepers of the family Vita-
ceae and includes Cyphostemma gigantophyllum, C. her-
mannioides, C. viscosum and Cissus nigropilosa. Other
typical herbs arc Polycarpaea corymbosa, Hypoestes for-
skaolii, Tricliceras spp. and Phyllanthus spp.
D2. Combretum-Terminalia-Diospyros wooded grass-
land
In the NLNP, vegetation type D2 occurs in mosaic
with mopane (E1/E2) and hill miombo (C2) throughout
its range (see map, Figure I). The Combretum apicula-
tum/Terminalia stenostachya/Diospyros kirkii associa-
tion (vegetation type D2) is the most extensive vegeta-
tion type in this mosaic, as it occurs on the shallow, stony
fersiallitic soils which cover the gentler slopes and flatter
regions of the upper valley floor. Hill miombo (C2 sub-
type 2) occurs in isolated patches on the deeper soils of
the ridge tops, while scrub miombo (C2 subtype 1)
occurs on the thin rocky soils of the steeper slopes.
Mopane woodland and scrub woodland (El and E2)
occur on sodic or calcareous patches of soil dotted
throughout the upper valley floor. This grassland, in
mosaic with vegetation types El, E2 and C2, covers an
area of approximately 1200 km2 in the NLNP and occurs
on the upper valley floor and in the foothills of the
Muchinga Mountains. Throughout its range this vegeta-
tion type is associated with gently sloping terrain with
relief measured in tens of metres.
The soils associated with D2 wooded grassland are
stoneless to very stony soils, over siltstone and grits,
which may or may not be covered with a surface mantle
of quartzoze stones. They are highly variable in texture
but tend to be shallow, grey to reddish brown and mod-
erately acid (pH 5. 4-6. 6).
Combretum-Terminalia-Diospyros wooded grassland
is defined by a well-developed grass/herb layer scattered
with small trees and shrubs covering 10% to 40% of the
surface. It is heterogeneous in composition and form,
grading into woodland in some areas and pure grassland
in others. Dominant small trees are Diospyros kirkii,
Terminalia stenostachya, T. stuhlmannii, Combretum
apiculatum, C. frag ran s, C. zeyheri, Crossopteryx febri-
fuga and Pseudolachnostylis maprouneifolia. Shrub
species include Bauhinia petersiana, Acacia hockii, A.
gerrardii and Ximenia caffra subsp. caffra. On the shal-
low, stony soils of this habitat, the grass layer is well
developed and dominated by medium to tall, coarse
grasses. Common species are Andropogon gayanus, A.
schirensis, A. fastigiatus, Aristida scabrivalvis, Dihete-
ropogon amplectens, Heteropogon contortus, Hyparr-
henia anemopaegma, Loudetia flavida, Monocymbium
ceresiiforme, Sorghum versicolor and Zonotriche amoe-
na. Bothriochloa bladhii , Sporobolus pyramidalis,
Heteropogon contortus , Echinochloa colona and Setaria
spp. are locally common in poorly drained areas.
Subshrubs typical of this habitat are Xerophyta suave-
olens, Pachycarpus lineolatus , Cissus cornifolia and
Cyphostemma spp. Characteristic herbs include Ipomoea
welwitschii, Pterodiscus elliottii, Chlorophytum syl-
vaticum , Lapeirousia eryantha, Raphionacme longituba,
Neorautanenici mitis, Vernonia melleri , Tephrosia spp.
and Gladiolus spp. Common ground herbs are Crotalaria
cephalotes. Euphorbia oatesii , Gardenia subacaulis and
Torennia spicata. Sumps and wet areas are characterised
by Cycnium tubulosum and sedges including Ascolepis
protea var. splendida, Kyllinga alba, Scleria bulbifera,
Cyperus margaritaceus and C. macrostachys.
Trapnell believes that this vegetation mosaic is the
result of sheet erosion. He suggests that the colluvial
soils of the escarpment were more extensive in the past,
covering much of the upper valley floor in the NLNR
Evidence for this is to be found outside the park, north of
Bothalia 28.2 (1998)
207
the Lufila river, where miombo woodland covers a large
area of the upper valley floor (Trapnell et al. 1950;
Edmonds 1976) and is found on soils of a colluvial
nature containing laterite nodules. It is postulated that, in
the NLNP and further south, much of this escarpment
soil has been washed away, leaving a dissected, undulat-
ing terrain, the slopes of which are characterised by a
thin, stony soil cover. This niche is occupied by vegeta-
tion type D2 in the areas of gentler relief and miombo
scrub woodland (C2 subtype 1) on the steeper slopes.
Hill miombo woodland (C2, subtype 2) occupies the
ridge tops, where remnants of the deep escarpment soil
cover remain. The patches of sodic or calcareous soil,
associated with the mopane vegetation (E1/E2) of the
upper valley floor, are almost certainly derived from
ancient, and in some cases recent, termite activity
(Trapnell et al. 1976).
E. COLOPHOSPERMUM MOPANE WOODLAND AND SCRUB
WOODLAND
Colophospermum mopane is the single dominant tree
species in this vegetation class. In the NLNP, mopane
may grow as a tall tree of up to 15 m, or it may take the
form of a multistemmed, stunted shrub <3 m tall. The
tall form is typical of Colophospermum mopane wood-
land (El) and the shrub form is characteristic of Colo-
phospemium mopane scrub woodland (E2). These two
vegetation types may occur in discrete areas or they may
grow together in mosaic. The difference between the two
types is largely the physiognomy of C. mopane, which
can be related to browsing damage and substrate as
described below. Together, the two mopane habitats
cover an area of approximately 600 km2 in the NLNP.
Mopane woodland and scrub woodland are recog-
nised by all of the authors referred to above (Trapnell
1953; Wild & Barbosa 1967; Asti q et al. 1969; Fanshawe
1971; Naylor et al. 1973; Edmonds 1976; Phiri 1989).
El. Colophospermum mopane woodland
This woodland occurs on the alluvial soils associated
with the Luangwa River and its tributaries in the east of
the park. The terrain is flat, but due to the sparse herba-
ceous layer and the impermeable nature of the soil,
mopane woodland is usually dissected with drainage
channels and erosion gullies.
Mopane woodland soils typically consist of a shallow
(sandy loam) A horizon over an impermeable B horizon
of brown or grey, cracking, slightly acid (pH 6. 0-6. 5)
clay. These soils are poorly drained and as a result, are
waterlogged during the rainy season. Continual sheet
erosion has the effect of removing the topsoil, and the
roots of mopane trees in this habitat are frequently
exposed or undermined.
In this vegetation type, Colophospermum mopane grows
as the single dominant species in an open two-storeyed
woodland comprising a canopy layer of mature trees (10-15
m tall) and an understorey of trees in various stages of
development. Trees and shrubs associated with C. mopane
are comparatively few, mainly species found in the thicket
habitats B1 and B2. Other associated species are Afzelia
quanzensis , Balanites aegyptiaca, and Ximenia americana.
The herbaceous component is dependent on substrate. On
soils with a sandy A horizon, the herbaceous layer is sparse
and largely composed of grasses, particularly those associ-
ated with vegetation type FI (e.g. Urochloa mossambicen-
sis, Chloris spp., Dacty’loctenium spp.). Other characteristic
species are Alloteropsis cimicina, Aristida rhiniochloa, A.
scabrivalvis, Eragrostis viscosa, Microchloa indica, Sporo-
bolus cordofanus and S. panicoides. In the sumps and wet-
ter areas typical grasses are Brachiaria deflexa ,
Echinochloa colona and Setaria pumila. On alluvial black
and brown clay soils, dicotyledons make up a larger pro-
portion of the herbaceous component with the family
Acanthaceae particularly well represented (see vegetation
type F2 subtype 2). Common species are Duospenna cre-
natum, D. quadrangulare, Hygrophila auriculata,
Blepharis tenniramea , Barleria prionitis and Monechma
debile. Other common herbs are Kalanchoe lanceolata.
Senna absus, Cyphostemma spp. and Ocimum spp.
The tall ‘cathedral mopane’ woodland associated with
deep alluvial soils east of the Luangwa, outside the
NLNR is not common in the park. Instead, this two-
storeyed form of woodland has arisen due to browsing
pressure, which prevents recruitment into taller size
classes (Caughley 1976). The most influential browsers
in mopane woodland are elephants, which tend to browse
destructively, pollarding the trees as they feed (Anderson
& Walker 1974; Caughley 1976; Lewis 1991; Styles
1993). However, in the past ten years the elephant popu-
lation of the Luangwa valley has been severely reduced
due to ivory poaching (Leader- Williams et al. 1990) and
if elephants are responsible for the maintenance of this
scrub mopane, it is to be expected that without their
browsing pressure, scrub mopane trees will grow into tall
trees and set seed. In the mopane plots laid down in this
study, individual tree heights, extent of damage and seed
status were recorded. Measurements in 1993, and 1994
suggest that, in many cases, height recruitment is occur-
ring. Further visits to these plots will be necessary to
confirm this trend.
E2. Colophospermum mopane scrub woodland
This woodland occurs in discrete patches throughout
all the habitats of the valley floor forming distinct islands
of vegetation, which are clearly visible as white patches
on aerial photographs. They appear to arise due to local
soil conditions.
The soils are typically compacted pinkish grey to light
grey sandy silt loams over an impermeable calcareous or
sodic clay loam B horizon. The xerophytic conditions
created by the impermeability of the soil, and the relative
alkalinity of the B horizon produce a hostile environment
for herbaceous plant species. The resulting paucity of
herbaceous ground cover exacerbates the erosion prob-
lems in this habitat and, as with vegetation type El , scrub
mopane soils are dissected by numerous drainage chan-
nels and erosion ditches.
As in El, Colophospermum mopane is dominant in this
vegetation type, but here its growth is stunted, and it rarely
208
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
exceeds 3 m in height. Characteristic associated shrubs are
Commiphora spp., Maerua angolensis (as a shrub) and
Lannea humilis. Climbers include Maerua juncea,
Hippocratea indica and Cissus spp. The herbaceous layer
is sparse. Typical grasses are Aristida spp., Sporobolus
cordofanus , S. panicoides and Eragrostis viscosa. Charac-
teristic subshrubs and herbs include Zanthoxylum chaly-
beum , Cadaba kirkii, Jasminum stenolobum (as a ground
herb or suffrutex), Decorsea schlechteri, Scadoxus multi-
florus, Plectranthus tettensis and Cyphostemma spp.
Ipomoea kituiensis is locally common.
There are two major factors which cause the shrub
growth form of Colophospermum mopane in the NLNP:
browser damage (see above) and/or soil conditions.
Where scrub mopane trees are intimately associated with
tall mopane trees, as in vegetation type El on the alluvial
soils in the east of the park, stunted growth appears to be
largely due to browser-pollarding. Elsewhere, both near
the river and throughout the rest of the park, compara-
tively large, discrete areas of scrub woodland occur. This
is a distinct vegetation type in which edaphic factors are
more important than browsing pressure in influencing
vegetation physiognomy (Dye & Walker 1980).
F. GRASSLANDS
The grasslands of the NLNP, defined as areas of
herbaceous vegetation with less than 10% woody vege-
tation cover, are all associated with water. Vegetation
Type FI is seasonally waterlogged, while types F2 and
F3 are associated with the rivers and dambos of the val-
ley and escarpment respectively.
Vegetation type FI is referred to by Phiri (1989) as
‘Floodplain grassland’ with Echinochloa colona cited as
the dominant species. Astle et al. (1969) describe this
vegetation type (landsystem 1; facet 7; photo 4) as ‘Short
Echinochloa grassland with Combretum obovatum
shrubs on dark cracking clays’.
Vegetation type F2 is readily recognisable in the pre-
vious valley surveys. The sandbar grassland (landsystem
1; facet lb) and pointbar deposit grassland (1; 5a) of
Astle et al. (1969) are synonymous with vegetation types
F2 subtype 1 and subtype 3, respectively, of the present
survey. Similarly, the dambos, mudflats and pointbar
grass habitats (2b, 2c and 2g, respectively) of Naylor et
al. (1973) are directly referable to vegetation type F2.
Vegetation type F3 is not dealt with by any of the val-
ley surveys, as it is an upper escarpment and plateau
habitat. However, Vesey-Fitzgerald (1963) gives a
detailed account of this vegetation type which he calls
‘Headwater valley grasslands (dambos)’. Loudetia sim-
plex and Hyparrhenia spp. are named as characteristic
species. White (1983) and Fanshawe (1971) also
describe this vegetation type, referring to it as ‘Dambo
grassland’ and ‘Bush-group grassland’ respectively.
FI. Chloris-Dactyloctenium-Echinochloa secondary
grassland
This type takes the form of short, annual grassland
punctuated with occasional clumps of Combretum obo-
vatum thicket. It is found on degraded mopane woodland
and, as a result, is often scattered with the skeletons of
dead mopane trees. Vegetation type FI covers a large
area of the NLNP (approximately 335 km2) and is found
on recently deposited alluvial soils adjacent to the
Luangwa River. The terrain is flat and low lying, and is
seasonally waterlogged during the rainy season.
Soils associated with this habitat tend to be shallow,
poorly drained, light grey, compacted neutral sandy clays
or sandy loams.
The important grasses in this habitat are short to medi-
um-sized, nutritional species such as Chloris virgata,
Dactyloctenium aegyptium, D. giganteum, Urochloa
mossambicensis, Digitaria acuminatissima and Era-
grostis gangetica. Echinochloa colona, Brachiaria
deflexa and Sporobolus pyramidalis favour the wetter
sites in this habitat. Typical herbs are Ammocharis tin-
neana, Crinum minimum, Leonotis nepetifolia, Senna
absus, Indigofera gairdnerae (ground herb), and in the
wetter areas, Heliotropium spp., Cycnium tubulosum and
sedges such as Ascolepis protea var. splendida and
Cyperus macrostachyos.
This grassland (FI) is clearly part of a dynamic suc-
cession. The extensive areas of FI grassland present in
the NLNP today were not recorded by Astle in 1965. At
that time, these areas were largely covered by mopane
woodland. It is probable that this succession has arisen
due to extensive browsing damage in mopane wood-
lands, concomitant with the well documented increase in
elephant numbers recorded in the valley during the
1970’s (Caughley 1976). Additional factors such as
waterlogging and fire may have been involved in main-
taining the grassland state. Recent observations made by
the author suggest that mopane seedlings are starting to
re-invade the FI grasslands in certain areas of the park.
This reversion to mopane woodland would be consistent
with the hypothesis that these grasslands are created and
maintained by elephants because, as stated above, ele-
phant numbers in the Luangwa valley have declined
drastically in the past ten years (Leader- Williams et al.
1990). Furthermore, recent anti-poaching efforts have
greatly reduced the incidence of man-made fires in the
park. The mechanics of this succession need to be under-
stood because this grassland is a particularly productive
habitat, which aerial survey has shown is utilised by
large numbers of grazers (NLCP census 1994). If these
grasslands revert back to mopane woodlands, an impor-
tant grazing habitat will be lost from the NLNP. Further
research is needed to investigate the grassland-mopane
succession, and the factors which influence it.
F2. Valley riverine grasslands
These grasslands are associated with the larger rivers
of the valley floor. The Mwaleshi, Mulandashi and
Luangwa Rivers all have extensive floodplains within
their meander belts as well as numerous attendant drain-
age channels, oxbow lagoons and dambos.
Various soils are associated with this vegetation type,
but all are based on the recently deposited alluvium of
the large rivers. All tend to be deep and stratified, with
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
209
soil textures ranging from the well-drained sandy soils of
the sandbars to the cracking black clays of the flood-
plains. Each substrate supports a distinctive grass and
herb component.
Subtype 1. Cynodon-Eragrostis grassland on sandy
soils : on the sand bars and sandy deposits of the inside
curves of the valley's rivers and streams, common tall
grasses are Andropogon gayanus, Cymbopogon excava-
tus, Digitaria milanjiana, Hyparrhenia filipendula,
Hyperthelia dissoluta, Pennisetum purpureum, Phrag-
mites mauritianus, Setaria sphacelata and Themeda
triandra. Common medium-sized grasses include Dac-
tyloctenium giganteum, Eragrostis cylindriflora, E. cilia-
nensis, Heteropogon conforms, Perotis patens and
Sporobolus pyramidalis. Smaller grasses include the
stoloniferous perennial Cynodon dactylon, which fre-
quently carpets sand bars and abandoned river channels
or ‘wafwas’ on compacted sands. Other short grass
species found on sandy alluvial soils are Chloris spp..
Dactyloctenium spp., Eleusine indica, Eragrostis cil-
iaris, Perotis leptopus, Sporobolus festivus and Urochloa
mossambicensis. Herbs associated with the sandy river-
ine soils of the valley floor include Waltheria indica ,
Trichodesma zeylanicum, Tridax procumbens, Sesamum
spp. and Striga spp.
Subtype 2. Setaria-Hyparrhenia grasslands and wooded
grassland on clay: the brown and black clay loams asso-
ciated with the floodplains of the valley’s larger rivers
support distinctive tall grassland. An important species
on brown clay loam soils is Hyparrhenia rufa , whereas
on black (black cotton) clays, Setaria incrassata (Ka-
sense) grows in pure stands. Interspersed with stands of
Hyparrhenia and Setaria , riverine clay soils support
areas of herbaceous vegetation dominated by the family
Acanthaceae. Hygrophila auriculata, Duosperma quad-
rangulare and D. crenatum are common in these areas,
together with species such as Senna obtusifolia , Indi-
gofera tinctoria, Sida alba, Ocimum spp. and Corchorus
spp. Sesbania greenwayii is locally common.
Setaria-Hyparrhenia riverine grassland frequently
grades into wooded grassland, with scattered trees from
vegetation type A1 (e.g. Kigelia africana, Acacia spp.,
Combretum spp.) or Colophospermum mopane forming
the woody component.
Subtype 3. Aquatic associations: water grass associa-
tions are found on the seasonally waterlogged clays of
the Luangwa River’s oxbow lagoons and dambos. In
these areas, which remain under water for most of the
rainy season, water-loving grasses such as Oryza barthii,
Echinochloa colona, Sporobolus pyramidalis and Setaria
spp. dominate. Common sedges in this habitat include
Cyperus esculentus, C. articulatus, C. distans and
Kyllinga alba. Characteristic water-associated herbs are
Polygonum setulosum, Lindemia oliveriana, Sphenoclea
zeylanica and Heliotropium spp. When water remains in
the lagoons and dambos, the aquatic water weed Pistia
stratiotes is characteristic. Around the peripheries of
lagoons and dambos as they dry out, typical herbaceous
species are Portulaca oleracea, Ludwigia stolonifera ,
Hibiscus articulatus, Alternanthera sessilis, Mimosa
pigra and Sphaeranthus spp.
F3. Loudetia simplex-Hyparrhenia dambo grassland
On the Muchinga Escarpment and hills of the NLNP
(Chinshenda, Mvumvwe and Soma) the rivers and
streams do not have a well-developed meander belt and,
as a result, the herbaceous riverside vegetation is less
well defined than in the valley. However, the numerous
dambos and drainage channels associated with these
watercourses do have a characteristic grass and herb
component.
Dambo soils are poorly drained and compacted. They
are typically leached illuvial soils, black, dark grey or
dark brown in colour, and acid (pH 5-6).
Early in the rainy season, the dambos of the upper
escarpment are characterised by the grasses Loudetia
simplex, Setaria sphacelata and S. pumila. Later on, in
April/May, Hyparrhenia species are ascendant: H. dip-
landra, H. nyassae, H. rufa, H. schimperi, H. collina, H.
variabilis and H. welwitschii may all be found at this
time. Other late season dominants are Andropogon chi-
nensis, Diheteropogon filifolius, Monocymbium ceresi-
iforme and Pennisetum unisetum. Typical herbs associat-
ed with the dambos of the upper escarpment include
Gnidia chrysantha, Moraea bella, Satyrium carsonii,
Cynorkis hanningtonii, Eulophia cucullata. Euphorbia
cyparissioides, Gladiolus spp. and Thunbergia spp.
Common sedges are Cyperus margaritaceus, C. cyper-
oides and Scleria spp.
The dominant grasses and herbs found on the dambos
and streams of the lower escarpment and hills are similar to
those found in the upper escarpment. However, a number
of water-associated grasses and herbs from the valley may
also occur. Grasses include Brachiaria brizantha, Digitaria
milanjiana, Echinochloa colona, E. pyramidalis, Setaria
pumila, S. sphacelata, Sporobolus pyramidalis, Themeda
triandra and Urochloa mossambicensis. Subshrubs and
herbs include Urena lobata. Senna occidentalis, Aeschy-
nomene mimosifolia, Ageratum conyzoides, Acmella
caulirhiza, Tragia lasiophylla, Alternanthera sessilis,
Ludwigia stolonifera and Polygonum setulosum.
Vegetation mosaics
The representation of vegetation as a series of discrete
types, based on communities or associations is, to some
extent, artificial in that observed vegetation associations
are almost invariably part of a continuum or occur in
mosaic with other communities (Craig 1983). This is a
problem of scale. The larger the scale of the map to be
produced, the smaller the area of association that can be
represented. For practical purposes however, some vege-
tation communities will always be too small to map sep-
arately. This applies in areas of mosaic or in cases where
vegetation communities occupy a microhabitat. The veg-
etation associated with termite mounds, for example, is
distinctive (Fanshawe 1968) and may be important to the
ecology of an area, yet as a type, it is often too dispersed
210
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
to be mapped separately. In the present study, clear
mosaics have been indicated on the map (Figure 1).
Elsewhere, dominant associations, not necessarily pure
associations, are depicted (see below).
CONCLUSIONS
Vegetation monitoring on any scale requires baseline
data from which deviations, or trends, can be measured.
Changes in woody cover over large areas, for example, can
be discerned from aerial photographs and satellite images.
In the case of the NLNP, mopane woodland for example,
can be mapped from historic aerial photographs (1952,
1965 and 1983) and compared with the 1995 LANDS AT-
derived digital data used in the present study (Figure 1 ).
Although aerial perspectives are useful records of
large-scale trends, they provide little information about
cause of change. Of much more use in this respect is
ground study information about vegetation structure and
species composition. In the present study, 353 relocat-
able plots were laid down and the precise data recorded
in each of these plots provides the basis for monitoring
vegetation changes in the future.
Finally, it is important to stress that this study presents
a coarse stratification of the vegetation of the NLNP, use-
ful for measuring changes in the park’s vegetation at this
scale. Although these vegetation units are fairly homoge-
neous, they still, in some cases, represent more than one
plant community. A more detailed study of plant associa-
tions in the park is needed if we are to begin to compre-
hend the processes involved in maintaining plant commu-
nities. At the species level, it is the local combination of
abiotic and biotic factors which make up a niche that is
important. If we arc to understand the autecology of
species, or even the ecology of ecotypes, we need to
understand the combinations of habitat components which
make up the niche. The great potential of geographical
information systems is that the detailed local picture can
gradually be built up. Spatial information about geology,
soil, topography, water relations, fire regimes, animal-
plant interactions and numerous other factors can be col-
lected over time and added to the picture. It is only
through this process that we can understand enough about
ecosystems to effectively manage them.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author would like to thank the North Luangwa
Conservation Project for its support throughout this
study. NLCP is in turn supported by the Owens
Foundation for Wildlife Conservation and Frankfurt
Zoological Society. The Project is grateful to National
Parks and Wildlife Services, Zambia for their co-opera-
tion and assistance throughout this survey. In the
Luangwa Valley, my thanks go to David Chile and
Godfrey Chikalipe for their invaluable help in the field.
Thank you too to my wife Deborah for carrying out the
soil survey associated with this study. In Lusaka, I am
indebted to Patrick Phiri, who allowed me access to his
herbarium at UNZA. Thanks also to Mike Bingham for
his help with identifying specimens. In the UK Gerald
Pope, Krukoff Curator of African Botany at the Royal
Botanic Gardens, Kew, arranged for me to use the
herbarium and library at that institution. Many thanks to
him. Finally, I am grateful to Colin Trapnell and Ray
Lawton, who took the time to read and comment on the
first draft of this paper.
REFERENCES
ANDERSON, G D & WALKER. B H 1974. Vegetation composition
and elephant damage in the Sengwa Wildlife Research Area,
Zimbabwe. Journal of the South African Wildlife Management
Association 4: 1-14.
ASTLE, W.L. 1989. South Luangwa National Park map — landscape
and vegetation. Department of Surveys, Lusaka.
ASTLE, W.L., WEBSTER, R. & LAWRANCE, C.J. 1969. Land clas-
sification for management planning in the Luangwa Valley of
Zambia. Journal of Applied Ecology 6: 143-169.
BELL, R.H.V. 1984. Soil-plant-herbivore interactions. In R.H.V. Bell
& E. Meshane-Caluzi, Conservation and wildlife management
in Africa. Proceedings of U.S. Peace Corps Workshop.
Kasungu, Malawi : 109-130.
BROWN, D. 1954. Methods of surveying and measuring vegetation.
Bulletin No. 42, Commonwealth Bureau of Pastures and Field
Crops, Hurley, Berks.
CAUGHLEY, G. 1976. The elephant problem — an alternative hypoth-
esis. East African Wildlife Journal 14: 265-283.
COLE, M.M. 1963. Vegetation and geomorphology in Northern
Rhodesia: an aspect of the distribution of the savanna of central
Africa. Geographical Journal 129: 290-310.
COLE, M.M. 1982. The influence of soils, geomorphology and geolo-
gy on the distribution of plant communities in savanna ecosys-
tems. In B.J. Huntley & B.H Walker, Ecology of tropical
savannas: 145-174. Ecological Studies 42. Springer- Verlag,
Berlin.
CONDIT, R„ HUBBELL, S.P., LAFRANKIE, J.V., SUKUMAR, R ,
MANOKARAN, N„ FOSTER, R.B. & ASHTON, PS. 1996.
Species-area and species-individual relationships for tropical
trees: a comparison of three 50 ha plots. Journal of Ecology 84:
549-562.
COURTNEY, F.M. & TRUDGILL, S.T. 1988. The soil— an introduc-
tion to soil study, 2nd edn. Edward Arnold, London.
CRAIG, G.C. 1983. Vegetation survey of Sengwa. Bothalia 14:
759-763.
CURTIS, J.T. & MCINTOSH, R.P. 1951. An upland forest continuum
in the prairie-forest border region of Wisconsin. Ecology 52:
476-496.
DYE, PJ. & WALKER, B.H. 1980. Vegetation-environment relations
on sodic soils of Zimbabwe Rhodesia. Journal of Ecology 68:
589-606.
EDMONDS, A.C.R. 1976. Republic of Zambia: vegetation map. Forest
Department, Zambia.
FANSHAWE, D.B. 1968. The vegetation of Zambian termitaria. Kirkia
6: 169-179.
FANSHAWE, D.B. 1971. The vegetation of Zambia. Forest Research
Bulletin No. 7. Government Printer, Lusaka.
GUY, PR. 1981 Changes in the biomass and productivity of wood-
lands in the Sengwa Wildlife Research Area, Zimbabwe.
Journal of Applied Ecology 18: 507-519.
KENT, M. & COKER, P. 1992. Vegetation description and analysis —
a practical approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
LAWTON, R M. 1978. A study of the dynamic ecology of Zambian
vegetation. Journal of Ecology 66: 175-198.
LEADER-WILLIAMS, N„ ALBON, S.D. & BERRY, P.S.M. 1990.
Illegal exploitation of black rhinoceros and elephant popula-
tions: patterns of decline, law enforcement and patrol effort in
Luangwa Valley, Zambia. Journal of Applied Ecology 27:
1055-1087.
LEBRUN, J.P. & STORK, A L 1991-1997 (4 volumes). Enumeration
des plantes d fleurs d'Afrique Tropicale. Conservatoire et Jardin
Botaniques de la Villc de Geneve, Geneve.
LEWIS, D M 1991. Observations on tree growth, woodland structure
and elephant damage on Colophospermum mopane in Luangwa
Valley, Zambia. African Journal of Ecology 29: 207-221.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
21 !
NAYLOR, J.N., CAUGHLEY. G.J., ABEL, N.O.J. & LIBERG, O. 1973.
Luangwa Valley Conservation and Development Project, Zambia.
Game Management and Habitat Manipulation. FAO, Rome.
PHIRI. RS.M. 1989. The flora of the Luangwa valley and an analysis
of its phytogeographical affinities. Ph.D. thesis. University of
Reading, UK.
PRAMER. D. & SCHMIDT. E.L. 1964. Experimental soil microbiolo-
gy. Burgess Publishing, Minnesota, USA.
SMITH. P.P. 1998. A preliminary' checklist of the vascular plants of the
North Luangwa National Park, Zambia. Kirkia 16: 205-245.
STYLES, C.V. 1993. Relationships between herbivores and
Colophospermum mopane of the Northern Tuli Game Reserve,
Botswana. M.Sc. thesis, University of Pretoria.
TAYLOR. R.D. & WALKER. B H 1978. Comparisons of vegetation
use and herbivore biomass on a Rhodesian game and cattle
ranch. Journal of Applied Ecology 15: 565-581.
TIMBERLAKE, J.R., NOBANDA, N. & MAPAURE. I. 1993.
Vegetation survey of the communal lands — north and west
Zimbabwe. Kirkia 14: 171-272.
TRAPNELL. C.G. 1953. The soils, vegetation and agriculture of North
Eastern Rhodesia, 2nd edn. Government Printer, Lusaka.
TRAPNELL, C.G., FRIEND, M.T., CHAMBERLAIN, G.T. &
BIRCH, H F. 1976. The effects of fire and termites on a
Zambian woodland soil. Journal of Ecology 64: 577-590.
TRAPNELL, C.G., MARTIN, J.D. & ALLAN, W. 1950. Vegetation-
soil map of Northern Rhodesia, 2nd edn. Government Printer,
Lusaka, Zambia.
UTTING, J. 1976. An introduction to the geological history of the
South Luangwa National Park, Zambia. Government Printer,
Lusaka.
VESEY-FITZGERALD, D.F. 1963. Central African grasslands.
Journal of Ecology 51: 243-273.
WALKER, B.H. 1976. An approach to the monitoring of changes in the
composition and utilization of woodland and savanna vegeta-
tion. South. African Journal of Wildlife Research 6: 1-32.
WHITE, F. 1983. The vegetation of Africa. Natural Resources Research
No. 20. A descriptive memoir to accompany UNESCO/AET-
FAT/UNSO vegetation map of Africa. Unesco, Pans.
WILD. H. & BARBOSA, L A G. 1967. Vegetation map of the Flora
Zambesiaca area. Supplement to Flora Zambesiaca. Collins,
Salisbury, Rhodesia.
Bothalia 28,2: 213-229 ( 1998)
Wetland plant communities in the Potchefstroom Municipal Area,
North-West, South Africa
S.S. CILLIERS*, L.L. SCHOEMAN* and G.J. BREDENKAMP**
Keywords: Braun-Blanquet, DECORANA, disturbed areas, MEGATAB, TURBOVEG, TWINSPAN, urban open spaces
ABSTRACT
Wetlands in natural areas in South Africa have been described before, but no literature exists concerning the phyto-
sociology of urban wetlands. The objective of this study was to conduct a complete vegetation analysis of the wetlands in
the Potchefstroom Municipal Area. Using a numerical classification technique (TWINSPAN) as a first approximation, the
classification was refined by using Braun-Blanquet procedures. The result is a phytosociological table from which a
number of unique plant communities are recognised. These urban wetlands are characterised by a high species diversity,
which is unusual for wetlands. Reasons for the high species diversity could be the different types of disturbances occurring
in this area. Results of this study can be used to construct more sensible management practises for these wetlands.
CONTENTS
Introduction 213
Study area 215
Materials and methods 215
Results and discussion 219
Classification 219
Description of the communities 219
Ordination 227
Conclusion 227
Acknowledgements 228
References 228
INTRODUCTION
According to the Ramsar Convention, which is also
known as The Convention on Wetlands of International
Importance, wetlands can be described as areas of marsh,
fen, peatland or water, whether natural or artificial, per-
manent or temporary (Cowan 1995). The water of wet-
lands can be static or flowing, fresh, brackish or salty,
including areas of marine water the depth of which at
low tide does not exceed six metres. Wetlands may
include adjacent riparian and coastal areas (Cowan
1995). Wetlands also refer to a mosaic of ecosystems that
typically form transition zones between uplands and
aquatic environments, although some do have discrete
boundaries thus not providing gradual transitions
(Catallo 1993).
Wetlands have many beneficial functions which are of
chemical, biological, socio-economical and physical or
hydrological nature (Williams 1990) and they play an
important role as water reservoirs, stream flow regula-
tors, flood attenuators, water purifiers and controllers of
soil erosion (Walmsley 1988). Additionally, wetlands
form specialised habitats for a great variety of plant and
animal species.
* Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Potchefstroom University for
C H E., 2531 Potchefstroom, South Africa.
** Department of Botany, University of Pretoria, 0002 Pretoria.
MS. received: 1998-02-18.
Many natural wetlands have been destroyed in the
course of agricultural, industrial and urban development
(Archibald & Batchelor 1992), and are regarded as one
of South Africa’s most endangered ecosystem types
(Walmsley 1988). The increasing use of fertilisers and
insecticides in catchment areas of wetlands and the fur-
ther threat of pollution by industries and the almost indis-
criminate use of some areas for grazing, contribute great-
ly to the degradation of wetlands (Fuls et al. 1992). As
early as 1951, Louw made the observation that the mod-
ification of natural vegetation and the destructive conse-
quences of man’s interference in the Potchefstroom area,
is nowhere as evident as along the numerous vleis, wet-
lands and spruits.
Conservation and management of wetlands need to be
addressed to ensure the natural functioning of these areas
as well as the maintenance of species diversity (Eckhardt
et al. 1993a). The need for the conservation of urban
wetlands resulted in the development of programmes
such as the Metropolitan Open Space Systems (MOSS)
programme of which the Durban MOSS (D’MOSS) is a
prime example. This programme proposed a new holistic
approach to city planning, one whereby indigenous
plants form an integral part of the urban landscape
(Roberts 1993). Because rivers, streams, pans, marshes,
estuaries, and lagoons are critically important to both
man and wildlife (Cooper & Duthie 1992), wetlands
within urban areas should form the essential core areas of
any MOSS network. The MOSS approach is presently
also being implemented in Durban, Pietermaritzburg,
East London, Port Elizabeth, Bloemfontein, the East
Rand, Port Alfred and Empangeni.
One of the first priorities, before a system such as
MOSS can be implemented, is an extensive phytosocio-
logical survey of the plant communities within the
municipal borders (Roberts 1993). Before conservation
strategies can be successfully implemented, detailed
knowledge and information of individual biotopes, their
ecological characteristics, location, and distribution
within the municipal area should be obtained, as well as
knowledge of the faunal and floral composition of these
214
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
Pofchefstroom University for C.H.E.
CARTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
Telephone: (0148) 299-1589
Fac simile : (0 1 48) 299-2503
E-Mail : GGPCC JVR^PUKNFT.PUK.AC.ZA
DATE : November 1997
Map : co<i<JiW\plb\sc-vs4and
LEGEND : g
| Wetland areas
I Residential and business areas
! Parks and recreation areas
j Informal green areas
University and College
Industrial area
Open Areas around City
Railway lines
FIGURE 1 . — Location of the wetlands and adjacent areas with different land use in the Potchefstroom Municipal Area, North-West, South Africa.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
215
biotopes (Starfinger & Sukopp 1994). The presence or
absence of some species in these biotopes may often
serve as a bio-indication of the disturbance or pollution
in these biotopes (Starfinger & Sukopp 1994).
Although phytosociological studies of wetlands in nat-
ural areas in the Grassland Bionte have been done by,
among others, Kooij et al. (1991), Fuls et al. (1992),
Bloem et al. (1993), Eckhardt et al. (1993a). Myburgh et
al. (1995) and Smit et al. (1995), no literature concerning
the phytosociology of urban wetlands exists. Bezuiden-
hout (1993) did not study wetlands in his comprehensive
syntaxonomical and synecological study of the western
Transvaal Grasslands, which include the natural areas
around Potchefstroom. The only study on the wetlands of
the Potchefstroom area was that of Louw (1951).
The objective of this study was, therefore, to conduct
a complete vegetation analysis of wetlands within the
Potchefstroom Municipal Area. Through this study it
should be possible to ascertain the extent of disturbance
due to urbanisation. This study forms part of an extensive
study of urban open spaces in a number of cities in the
North-West, South Africa, with the ultimate aim of a
phytosociological and syntaxonomical synthesis of all
urban open spaces.
STUDY AREA
Potchefstroom is situated in the Dry Sandy Highveld
Grassland (Bredenkamp & Van Rooyen 1996) of the
Grassland Biome (Rutherford & Westfall 1994).
The present study covered the wetlands within the
Potchefstroom Municipal Area (between 27° 04' and 27°
07' longitude and 26° 40' and 26° 44’ latitude) in the
North-West province (Figure 1). Potchefstroom is locat-
ed around the Mooi River, near the confluence of the
Mooi River and Loopspruit. Geologically this area is
underlain by Pretoria Group strata, namely shale and
quartzite with major diabase intrusives. The diabase sills
and the Pretoria Group shale are major sources of clay,
which may be supplemented by Karoo age clays weath-
ered from palaeokarst in Malmani Dolomite along the
upper reaches of the Mooi River (Nel et al. 1939).
The rainfall in Potchefstroom is erratic, but the mean
annual rainfall exceeds 600 mm. Summer temperatures
are high, the mean monthly maximum temperatures
exceed 32° C during October to January, whereas the
mean monthly minimum temperatures are below -1° C
during the months of June to August (Weather Bureau
1988).
The entire Potchefstroom area is drained by the Vaal
River and its tributaries, of which the Mooi River and
Loopspruit are the most important. The latter has its ori-
gin near Losberg. The Mooi River is a perennial stream,
fed by a number of strong springs in the dolomite forma-
tion, within and beyond the northern limits of the area.
The study area includes three large marshland areas
which will be referred to as the Arboretum, Van der Hoff
Park and Prozesky marshlands (Figure 1) and a number
of very small marshland areas which will not specifical-
ly be referred to. The Arboretum is a conservation area
on the city margin in the northern part of Potchefstroom,
northwest of the Potchefstroom Dam and is bordered by
natural grasslands. This area is relatively undisturbed in
comparison with the other two marshlands, although it is
invaded by large reedswamps. The Van der Hoff Park
marshland is situated between two residential areas close
to the city centre, but is heavily disturbed due to grazing
especially by horses. It is a very flat bottomland area
without any deep depressions or drainage canals. The
marshlands referred to as the Prozesky marshlands are
situated in the O.P.M. Prozesky Bird Sanctuary. This
conservation area, which stretches from relatively close
to the city centre to the southern municipal border, is
characterised by deep depressions and drainage canals
with higher-lying areas in between, which are heavily
grazed by cattle. This wetland is interrupted by a road
before it links to a number of dams of the municipal
sewage plant. The remaining parts of the banks of the
Mooi River houses recreational facilities, sports grounds,
including a trim park and a golf course, as well as a num-
ber of residential gardens (Figure 1). The Wasgoedspruit
which drains the western parts of the city, including
industrial areas, as well as natural areas, into the Mooi
River, is also part of the system. The Wasgoedspruit is
disturbed and part of it is layed out with concrete.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Releves were compiled in 102 sample plots during the
period January to March 1996. Plot sizes were fixed at 16
nr for herbaceous communities and 100 nr for woody
communities (Bredenkamp & Theron 1978). For each
species present in the sample plots, the cover-abundance
values according to Braun-Blanquet scales were used
(Mueller-Dombois & Ellenberg 1974)
Habitat parameters recorded, included topography,
aspect, slope, soil type and various soil properties,
including physical and chemical analyses. The soil prop-
erties in the A and B horizons included percentage grav-
el, sand, silt and clay; exchangeable K+, Na2+, Mg+ and
Ca+; soil conductivity, soil pH (H2O), soil depth and the
in situ soil compaction (together with gravimetric water
content) in accordance to the Soil Classification Work
Group (1991). Different aspects of direct or indirect
anthropogenic influences (human impact) such as mow-
ing, weeding, trampling, grazing, the use of chemicals
and erosion, were also recorded as thoroughly as possi-
ble. It was impossible, though, to quantify the intensities
of these anthropogenic influences, but terms such as
heavy trampling, heavy grazing and frequent mowing are
used in the text to express extreme levels of anthro-
pogenic influences.
The TWINSPAN classification algorithm (Hill
1979a) and the BBPC suite (Bezuidenhout et al. 1996)
were used for analysing the floristic data, as first approx-
imation, and subsequently Braun-Blanquet procedures
were used to refine these results. A phytosociological
table (Table 1) was obtained through these procedures.
This approach proved to produce ecologically reliable
results in many phytosociological studies in natural areas
216
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
217
218
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
219
(Behr & Bredenkamp 1988; Bredenkamp et al. 1989).
An additional software package (TURBOVEG) was
used for capture, processing, and presentation of phy-
tosociological data (Hennekens 1996a) as well as a visu-
al editor (MEGATAB) for phytosociological tables
(Elennekens 1996b). Introduced species are clearly
marked in Table 1. The occurrence of each species in a
specific stratum is indicated with a symbol, namely, tl
for a high tree layer (> 10 m), t2 for an intermediate tree
layer (5-10 m), t3 for a low tree layer (< 5 m), si for a
high shrub layer (> 2 m), s2 for a low shrub layer (< 2 m)
and hi for a herbaceous layer, in Table 1. Differentiation
between trees and shrubs was based on definitions pro-
posed by Edwards (1983). Two different numbering sys-
tems were used in Table 1, namely a releve number
which starts at 1 and indicates the releve numbers which
were used in this particular study and a TURBOVEG
number which indicates the unique releve number in the
South African phytosociological data base.
Species which were only encountered once or twice
during the study or which are not diagnostic for a specif-
ic community or group of communities are not included
in Table 1. These species are, however, included in Table
2 and are also mentioned in the results. An ordination
algorithm, DECORANA (Hill 1979b) was applied to the
floristic data to determine floristic relationships between
communities and to detect possible habitat and/or distur-
bance gradients associated with vegetation gradients.
Taxa names conform to those of Arnold & De Wet
(1993), but are updated to November 1996 according to
the PRECIS floristic data base of South Africa, managed
by the National Botanical Institute in Pretoria. Soil
nomenclature follows the classification of the Soil
Classification Working Group (1991). No attempt was
made to formally fix syntaxa names because this is nor-
mally avoided in detailed local studies. Formal syntax-
onomy will follow after the analyses of all the different
land use types in the urban area of Potchefstroom.
Formal syntaxa which are referred to in this study were
already described by other authors. The names of these
formal syntaxa are used as they were published without
any attempt to validate invalid names or to correct any
typographical errors.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Classification
The classification resulted in the recognition of one
major community, 14 communities, nine subcommuni-
ties and three variants. The specific position of some of
the communities in the three marshland areas are shown
in Figure 2.
From the phytosociological table (Table 1) the fol-
lowing communities could be recognised:
1. Salix babylonica Woodland Community
1.1. Rhus pyroides Subcommunity
1.2. Populus x canescens Subcommunity
1.3 Populus wislizenii Subcommunity
1.4 Salix babylonica-Pennisetum clandestinum Sub-
community
2 Amaranthus hybridus-Pennisetum clandestinum
Ruderal Community
3 Berkheya radula-Themeda triandra Grassland
Community
4 Hyparrhenia hirta Grassland Community
5 Cyperus longus Major Wetland Community
5.1 Cichorium intybus-Xanthium strumarium Invasive
Community
5.1.1 Paspalum dilatatum Subcommunity
5 . 1 . 1 . 1 Cynodon dacty’lon Variant
5. 1.1. 2 Ambrosia psilostachya Variant
5. 1.1. 3 Senecio inornatus Variant
5.1.2 Cyperus marginatus Subcommunity
5.1.3 Sesbania bispinosa Subcommunity
5.2 Berula erecta Community
5.2.1 Rumex conglomerate Subcommunity
5.2.2 Falckia oblonga Subcommunity
5.3 Leersia hexandra Community
6 Cyperus fastigiatus-Paspalum distichum Wetland
Community
7 Schoenoplectus corymbosus Wetland Community
8 Eleocharis palustris Wetland Community
9 Carex acutiformis Wetland Community
10 Typha capensis Reedswamp Community
1 1 Phragmites australis Reedswamp Community
12 Azolla filiculoides Floating Community
Description of the plant communities
1 . Salix babylonica Woodland Community
This woodland community occurs on the banks of the
entire Mooi River, with the exception of parts of the Van
der Hoff Park marshland (Figure 2). The soils are deep
(> 120 cm) but shallower and with lower clay content
(< 50%) than that of the marshland communities. The
dominant species in this community is Salix babylonica
(species group D, Table 1), an introduced tree which is
naturalised along watercourses in southern Africa
(Henderson 1991). These trees are planted at dams and
along riverbanks, but its extensive occurrence along the
Mooi River is most likely due to self (vegetative) propa-
gation and dispersal by floodwaters.
Although these trees are aesthetically pleasing and
beneficial to man and the environment under certain cir-
cumstances, they also have disadvantages such as being
a potential threat to the conservation of indigenous ripar-
ian and wetland vegetation (Henderson 1991). The pro-
lific lateral root system of Salix babylonica is very effec-
tive in arresting soil erosion of the river banks, but it may
also lead to the damming up of small streams and possi-
bly even flooding during high rainfall seasons.
The diagnostic species of this community are those of
species group D (Table 1), and include introduced trees
such as Salix babylonica, Celtis sinensis, More alba and
Ligustrum lucidum, as well as the declared invader Melia
azedarach and the indigenous tree, Celtis africana.
Other diagnostic species are the shrubs Solanum nigrum
and Pyracantha coccinea, the climbers Araujia seri-
cifera and Merremia tridentata and the highly invasive
rhizomatous fern-like plant, Equisetum ramosissimum
(species group D, Table 1). Other species in this commu-
220
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
TABLE 2. — List of species which occurred only a few times and have
relatively low cover-abundance values, as well as species not
restricted to specific communities in wetlands of Potchef-
stroom Municipal Area, North-West, South Africa
introduced species.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
221
* introduced species
nity are the turf grass, Pennisetum clandestinum (species
group G, Table 1), the indigenous but invasive shrub.
Asparagus laricinus (species group J, Table 1) and intro-
duced annuals such as Tagetes minuta and Bidens bipin-
nata (species group R, Table 1).
Although Eckhardt et al. (1993a) mentioned the pres-
ence of huge specimens of Salix babylonica along the
Klip River and in the Seekoeivlei area, northeastern Free
State, no Salix babylonica Community was described.
Four subcommunities can be distinguished in the
Salix babylonica Woodland Community, based on spe-
cies composition:
1.1. Rhus pyroides Subcommunity
This subcommunity is situated mainly on the city mar-
gin in relatively dry areas on the river banks, but occurs on
lower-lying areas which are seasonally waterlogged, as
well. It is commonly associated with vertic soils, for exam-
ple the Arcadia soil form. It is further characterised by the
presence of a dense shrub stratum (canopy cover of 70%
and up to 3 m tall) underneath the Salix babylonica trees.
The diagnostic shrubs are the indigenous species Rhus
pyroides and Maytenus heterophylla and the introduced
species Pyracantha angustifolia (species group A, Table 1).
Another shrub with relatively high cover in this subcom-
munity is Asparagus laricinus (species group J, Table 1)
which is an important component of bush encroachment in
disturbed areas in the Grassland Biome (Friedel 1987;
Cilliers & Bredenkamp in press). The tree stratum of 70%
canopy cover and height of 8 m is equally well developed
and consists of the trees mentioned in species group D
(Table 1). One other tree, Robinia pseudoacacia and a
number of herbaceous species which occurred only once in
this subcommunity are mentioned in Table 2. The herba-
ceous stratum is poorly developed with a canopy cover of
5% and a height of 90 cm. An average number of 17
species was recorded per sample plot of which 73% were
introduced and only 23% were therophytes.
1.2. Populus x canescens Subcommunity
On wetter areas on the river banks and on small
islands in the Mooi River, the prolific invader Populus x
canescens (species group B, Table 1) forms dense stands
FIGURE 2. — Schematic illustration
of some of the communities
in three marshland areas in
wetlands of Potchefstroom
Municipal Area, North-West,
South Africa. A, Arboretum;
B, Van der Hoff Park; C,
O PM. Prozesky Bird Sanc-
tuary. All other symbols ex-
plained in text.
222
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
due to root suckering. Although Populus x canescens can
also arrest soil erosion, it has the same disadvantages as
Salix babylonica, namely a threat to indigenous wetland
communities and it may also cause flooding. The shrub
and herbaceous strata are poorly developed, in compari-
son with the tree stratum (canopy cover of 80% and 8 m
tall). Not many other species grow in this subcommuni-
ty, apart from climbers such as Araujia sericifera and
Merremia tridentata (species group D, Table 1), and the
shrub Asparagus laricinus (species group J, Table 1). An
average number of nine species was recorded per sample
plot of which 81% were introduced and only 12% were
therophytes.
1.3. Populus wislizenii Subcommunity
This subcommunity is characterised by the presence
of the diagnostic tree Populus wislizenii (species group
C, Table 1), a very large and conspicuous shade tree
which is planted in adjacent parks. These trees propagate
by means of cuttings and do not show any great tenden-
cy to sucker and therefore, it is not sure how they are
spreading into the Salix babylonica Community from the
parks. This subcommunity, established on the higher
river banks, which are built up by man or which is the
result of deep streambed incission, rarely occurs at water
level. It is situated mainly on the man-made or anthro-
pogenous soil type, Witbank, but still with a clay per-
centage of close to 40%. The very well-developed tree
stratum with a canopy cover of nearly 100% and a max-
imum height of 12 m, makes this subcommunity very
conspicuous. The shrub and herbaceous strata are poorly
developed. An average of 14 species per sample plot was
recorded for this community of which 76% were intro-
duced and only 7% were therophytes.
1 .4. Salix babylonica-Pennisetum clandestinum Sub-
community
The Salix babylonica-Pennisetum clandestinum Sub-
community occurs mainly along the river banks in parks,
sports grounds and other recreational areas, but was
occasionally encountered in some of the marshy areas as
well. The main soil type on which this subcommunity
occurs is the vertic Arcadia soil form, but it is also asso-
ciated with the anthropogenous soil form, Witbank. The
soils are relatively deep, with a high clay content and is
sometimes heavily compacted (up to 4 kg/m2). Although
no diagnostic species occur in this subcommunity it is
characterised by the absence of the species of species
groups A, B and C (Table 1) and a relatively high cover
of the turf grass, Pennisetum clandestinum (species
group G, Table 1), which invades from adjacent lawns.
The dominant tree is Salix babylonica in the well-devel-
oped tree stratum (canopy cover of 65% and up to 8 m
high). The total lack of young trees establishing in this
subcommunity is worth mentioning. The shrub stratum
which consists mainly of Asparagus laricinus close to
the stems of the trees, has a canopy cover of 20% and an
average height of 1.5 m. Apart from Pennisetum clan-
destinum, the well-developed herbaceous stratum (70%
canopy cover) consists mainly of introduced forbs such
as Taraxacum officinale (Table 2) and the annuals, Ipo-
moea purpurea, Bidens pilosa (species group F, Table 1 ),
Tagetes minuta and Bidens bipinnata (species group R,
Table 1). Parts of this subcommunity are mown every
4-6 weeks together with adjacent lawns, according to
Mr P. Labuschagne, Department of Parks and Recrea-
tion, Potchefstroom Municipality. An average number of
15 species per sample plot was recorded of which 64%
were introduced and 13% were therophytes.
2. Amaranthus hybridus-Pennisetum clandestinum Ru-
deral Community
This community is situated on alluvial deposits in the
beds of parts of the Wasgoedspruit as well as on its gen-
tly sloping inner banks. It is also developing on debris
which is the result of an attempt to cover the beds of
some areas with concrete. The Wasgoedspruit drains
some of the natural areas on the west side of Potchef-
stroom, as well as industrial areas where a number of
chemical plants are situated. Sporadic chemical pollution
of this drainage canal was, therefore, encountered in the
past. The pollution is probably one of the reasons why no
true wetland or reedswamp communities developed in
this area. The Wasgoedspruit is mostly dry, but is heavi-
ly disturbed during floods, making this a true ruderal
community. The Amaranthus hybridus-Pennisetum
clandestinum Ruderal Community is associated with the
Witbank (anthropogenic) soil form with a clay content of
< 40%, and which are at places rather heavily compact-
ed (4.5 kg/m2).
No tree or shrub stratum exists, but the herbaceous
stratum is relatively well developed with a canopy cover
of about 50% and an average height of 1 m. The turf
grass Pennisetum clandestinum (species group G, Table
1) which invades from adjacent parks, is the dominant
species. The diagnostic species include introduced forbs
and grasses, such as the annuals Amaranthus hybridus
and Datura stramonium, which is also a declared weed
(Wells et al. 1986) and the perennials Modiola carolini-
ana and Sorghum halepense, as well as the indigenous
forbs, Solatium panduriforme and Commelina beng-
halensis (species group E, Table 1). Other species which
were only recorded once in this study are indigenous
grasses such as Chloris virgata, Urochloa mosambicen-
sis, Brachiaria eruciformis, Echinocloa colona and
Aristida congesta (Table 2). Other species in this com-
munity are the highly invasive pioneer grass Cynodon
dactylon and the conspicuous tall-growing annuals,
Tagetes minuta and Bidens bipinnata (species group R,
Table 1). An average number of 14 species was recorded
per sample plot, of which 46% were introduced and 35%
were therophytes.
3. Berkheya radula-Themeda triandra Grassland Com-
munity
The Berkheya radula-Themeda triandra Grassland
Community forms a transitional area between adjacent
higher-lying grasslands and the lower-lying wetland
communities in the study area (Figure 2). Although situ-
ated in bottomlands, it is still much higher than the
marshlands. This community occurs on clay loam to
sandy clay loam soil types, as well as on duplex soils
with a high clay content (> 50%), representing the
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
223
Valsrivier and Rensburg soil forms, and occasionally on
rocky soils of the Glenrosa soil form.
The diagnostic species of this community are those of
species group H (Table 1). It includes the two dominant
species, the indigenous grass Themeda triandra, which is
widespread in the Grassland Biome, and the indigenous
forb Berkheya rodula which is characteristic of soils with
a high clay content. Other diagnostic species are all
indigenous grasses such as Eragrostis chloromelas, Di-
gitaria eriantha, Panicum stapfianum and Cymbopogon
plurinodis. Species which are also abundant in this com-
munity are the indigenous grass, Setaria sphacelata
(species group U, Table 1) and the introduced forb,
Physalis viscosa (species group K, Table 1 ). Forbs which
are typically found in the adjacent grasslands, such as
Crabbea angustifolia , Rhynchosia totta, Corchorus asple-
nifolius and Monsonia angustifolia (Table 2) were also
encountered in this community. This community is fur-
ther characterised by the encroachment of the shrub.
Asparagus laricinus (species group J, Table 1) forming a
canopy cover of up to 12% in some areas. No tree stra-
tum exists in this community. An average number of 13
species per sample plot was recorded of which 25% were
introduced and 11% were therophytes.
This community resembles, to a certain extent, the
Themeda triandra Variant of the Eragrostidetum planae,
an association described for the seasonally wet bottom-
lands of the Be land type in which Potchefstroom is sit-
uated (Bezuidenhout & Bredenkamp 1991). A similar
grassland community which represents a transitional
zone between relatively dry and wet grasslands, the
Themeda triandra-Eragrostis plana dry/wet grassland
was described by Eckhardt et al. (1993b) for the north-
eastern Free State.
4. Hyparrhenia hirta Grassland Community
The Hyparrhenia hirta Grassland Community is also
situated on the seasonally flooded bottomlands adjacent
to marshlands, but usually higher than them (Figure 2). It
is situated next to the Berkheya radula-Themeda triandra
Community in some areas but on the lower-lying wetter
parts on soils of the Valsrivier and Rensburg soil forms.
The dominant and also one of the diagnostic species
is the indigenous grass Hyparrhenia hirta (species group
I, Table 1). Other species in this community are those of
species groups J, K, Q, R and U (Table 1). The herba-
ceous stratum is well developed with a canopy cover of
70% and a height of 1.5 m. No tree stratum exists in this
community, but the shrub stratum with Asparagus larici-
nus and Rhus pyroides is relatively well developed
(canopy cover of up to 30% and 1.8 m tall). The abun-
dance of the invasive grass, Cynodon dactylon and the
introduced annuals, Tagetes minuta and Bidens bipinna-
ta (species group R, Table 1) is an indication of the grad-
ual degradation of this community. An average number
of 12 species was recorded per sample plot of which 47%
were introduced and 23% were therophytes.
In a syntaxonomical and synecological study of the
western Transvaal Grasslands, Bezuidenhout (1993) de-
scribed a number of wetland communities where Hy-
parrhenia hirta is dominant, and which form part of the
Eragrostido planae-Hyparrhenietea hirtae (Bezui-
denhout et al. 1994a). The Hyparrhenia hirta Grassland
Community, currently described, shows habitat and flor-
istic resemblances to the Eragrostidetum planae (Bezui-
denhout & Bredenkamp 1991) and the Hyparrhenio hir-
tae-Eragrostidetum planae (Bezuidenhout et al. 1994b),
but with much lower species diversity.
5. Cyperus longus Major Wetland Community
This major wetland community is the largest of all the
communities, fringing the reedswamps and is mainly sit-
uated in two of the three marshlands in the study area,
namely Van der Hoff Park and Prozesky (Figures 1 and
2). It occurs in a very wide spectrum of habitats, namely
from dry to seasonally wet to waterlogged areas, as well
as in different stages of habitat degradation. All these
variations are covered by the different communities, sub-
communities and variants.
With the exception of isolated and scattered occur-
rence of trees and shrubs, no real tree and shrub strata is
present in this community. The herbaceous stratum is
well developed. The diagnostic species of this major
wetland community are those of species group X (Table
1). The most conspicuous of these species are the tall-
growing perennial sedge, Cyperus longus , which shows
a great degree of plasticity as it is encountered in aquat-
ic, helophytic and mesophytic habitats. Because of the
effects of grazing and trampling, accompanied by the
development of habitats better suited for other species,
Cyperus longus is disappearing from some areas where it
was dominant some years ago. The diagnostic species
include true wetland species which are also diminishing
in certain areas, such as Ranunculus multifidus, Falckia
oblonga , Stenotaphrum secundatum and Crinum bulbi-
spermum, and invasive species such as Paspalum dilata-
tum and Senecio inornatus (species group X, Table 1).
A similar broad major wetland community, the
Echinochloa holubii-Cyperus longus Wetland was
described by Kooij et al. (1991) for watercourses, river-
banks, valley flats, flood plains and stream channels in
the Kroonstad area, Free State. Although the Cyperus
longus Major Wetland Community, currently described,
is situated on the same soil types it differs from the com-
munity described by Kooij et al. (1991) with respect to
species composition. The difference in species composi-
tion is probably due to the type and intensity of distur-
bances in urban areas.
The Cyperus longus Major Wetland Community is
divided into the following communities based on habitat
and type and intensity of the disturbances:
5.1. Cichorium intybus-Xanthium strumarium Invasive
Community
This community is highly disturbed and is situated in
the heavily grazed areas in the Van der Hoff Park and
Prozesky marshland areas (Figure 2). It is characterised
by the extensive invasion of the dominant species, the
grass Cynodon dactylon (species group R, Table 1),
224
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
which could suggest an enriched nitrogen status of the
soil (Kooij et al., 1991), probably due to biotic effects,
e.g. from animal excretions. This community is further
characterised by the decrease of the sedge, Cyperus
longus (species group X, Table I ), which probably was
the dominant species in this area. The diagnostic species
of this community are the introduced forbs, Cichorium
intybus and the declared weed Xanthium strumcirium
(Wells et al. 1986) as well as the indigenous, perennial
grasses Helictotrichon turgidulum and Eragrostis plana
(species group P, Table 1). Other species which occur in
this community are those of species groups Q and U
(Table 1).
Three subcommunities can be distinguished in this
community based on water content of the soil and degree
of disturbance.
5.1.1. Paspalum dilatatum Subcommunity
This subcommunity is situated on the higher-lying,
somewhat drier areas occupied by the Cichorium inty-
bus-Xanthium strumarium Invasive Community (Figure
2). No diagnostic species occur but it is characterised by
the abundance of the conspicuous introduced grass,
Paspalum dilatatum (species group X, Table 1).
Three variants, which are forming interconnected
mosaics or patches with each other, could be distin-
guished in the Paspalum dilatatum Subcommunity:
5. 1.1.1. Cynodon dactylon Variant
The Cynodon dactylon Variant occurs on the flatter
areas in footpaths (in the O.P.M. Prozesky Bird
Sanctuary) and near entrance gates which are heavily
trampled by man and grazing cattle and horses. The foot-
paths are sometimes mown as well. This variant is asso-
ciated with the Witbank (anthropogenic) and Rensburg
soil forms with deeply cracking, vertic clays, and is also
heavily compacted (> 4.5 kg/m2). With the exception of
a number of herbaceous species which were recorded
once or twice (Table 2), no diagnostic species were
encountered in this variant. It is characterised, however,
by the absence of species of species groups L and M
(Table 1), the total dominance of Cynodon dactylon and
a low species diversity in comparison with the other vari-
ants. Other species which occur are typically ruderal
species which can probably withstand the effect of tram-
pling and grazing such as Physalis viscosa (species
group K, Table 1), Plantago lanceolata and the prostrate
indigenous forb, Conyza podocephala (species group U,
Table 1). An average of 12 species was recorded per
sample plot of which 44% were introduced and 20%
were therophytes.
5.1. 1.2. Ambrosia psilostachya Variant
The Ambrosia psilostachya Variant of the Paspalum
dilatatum Subcommunity is mainly associated with the
drier, overgrazed areas in the wetlands of Prozesky, on
the same soil types as the Cynodon dactylon Variant. The
diagnostic species are the forbs Ambrosia psilostachya
and Oxalis pes-caprae and the indigenous grasses
Eragrostis micrantha and Andropogon schirensis (spe-
cies group L, Table 1 ). Although no tree or shrub stra-
tums exists in this variant, the indigenous shrub
Asclepias decipiens and the introduced tree Gleditsia tri-
acanthos (Table 2) have a scattered distribution. Due to
the high levels of disturbance an unusually high average
number for wetland areas of 22 species per sample plot
was recorded, of which 42% were introduced and only
12% were therophytes.
5. 1.1.3. Senecio inornatus Variant
The Senecio inornatus Variant is encountered in the
slightly lower and wetter parts of the higher-lying areas in
the wetlands of the O.P.M. Prozesky Bird Sanctuary.
Although the diagnostic species is the indigenous shrub
Gomphocarpus fruticosus (species group M, Table 1), the
variant is better characterised by its dominant species,
namely the introduced, prostrate grass Cynodon dactylon
and the indigenous tall-growing forb, Senecio inornatus.
Although Senecio inornatus is also present in other wet-
land communities, it develops here into relatively dense
patches of conspicuous plants due to their height (2 m and
higher) and their corymbs of brightly yellow coloured
capitula. The sedge, Cyperus longus, which was the dom-
inant species in this area about two to three years ago, is
totally absent in this variant. An average number of 15
species was recorded per sample plot of which 52% were
introduced and 16% were therophytes.
5.1.2. Cyperus marginatus Subcommunity
This subcommunity is associated with lower-lying,
seasonally waterlogged areas (Figure 2) on the Rensburg
soil form with soil compaction of up to 5 kg/m2 or on the
Bloemdal soil form with soil compaction of less than 2
kg/m2. Although the annual, introduced forb Physalis
cmgulata (species group N, Table 1) is the only diagnostic
species, this subcommunity is better characterised by the
presence of the tall-growing sedge, Cyperus marginatus
(species group W, Table 1). The invasive grass, Cynodon
dactylon and the other tall-growing sedge, Cyperus longus
are still the dominant species. Louw (1951) described
Cyperus marginatus as a robust species which plays a
major role in succession in the Vaal River, but which is rel-
atively unimportant elsewhere. Although this species was
found in the Potchefstroom urban wetlands, the subcom-
munity in which it exists seems to diminish. This is prob-
ably due to the effects of trampling and grazing, because it
is only situated in relatively small patches in lower-lying,
wetter areas. The abundance of introduced annuals such as
Physalis angulata (species group N, Table 1), Tagetes
minuta and Bidens bipinnata and the declared weed
Xanthium strumarium (species group R, Table 1) (Wells et
al. 1986) is a further indication of the degraded state of the
Cyperus marginatus Subcommunity. An average number
of 1 5 species was recorded per sample plot of which 5 1 %
were introduced and 17% were therophytes.
5. 1 .3. Sesbania bispinosa Subcommunity
This subcommunity represents a more degraded form
of the Cyperus marginatus Subcommunity. The diagnos-
tic species are the introduced, annual to biannual inva-
Bothalia 28.2 (1998)
225
sive shrub, Sesbania bispinosa and the introduced forb,
Flaveria bidentis (species group O, Table 1). An average
number of 11 species was recorded per sample plot of
which 53% were introduced and 30% were therophytes.
5.2. Benda erecta Community
The Berula erecta Community is found in seasonally
wet bottomland areas which were at the time of the study
partly under standing water of up to 10 cm (Figure 2).
The soils are quite deep, undrained vertic soils with a
high clay content (> 60%). The community is associated
with areas close to or adjacent to the river, in the absence
of a tree stratum.
The diagnostic species of this community are the low-
growing, indigenous forbs, Berula erecta and Mentha
aquatica (species group T, Table 1). Other species are the
tall-growing sedge, Cyperus longus, the low-growing,
mat-forming forb, Falckia oblonga and the indigenous
vlei grass, Stenotaphrum secundatum (species group X,
Table 1 ). The Berula erecta Community is further char-
acterised by the absence of the species of species groups
P, Q and R (Table 1), although Cynodon dactylon invades
into the margins of this community. The vegetation
seems to be relatively undisturbed, but trampling by the
grazing animals keeps the wet soil in a permanently pud-
dled condition, which favours the establishment of
Phragmites australis and Typha capensis from the adja-
cent reedswamps (Communities 10 and 11). Although
not recorded during the study, blooms of the very inva-
sive water fern, Azolla filiculoides can sometimes be
found in these puddles, as well. The indigenous geo-
phyte, Crinum bulbispermum (species group X, Table 1),
although not abundant, has a scattered distribution in this
community.
Two subcommunities could be distinguished in this
community.
5.2.1. Rumex conglomeratus Subcommunity
On slightly lower-lying areas of the Berula erecta
Community, where water seems to stagnate when the
rainfall is high (Figure 2), small clumps of the perennial
forb, Rumex conglomeratus (species group S, Table 1)
establish. An average number of only eight species per
sample plot was recorded of which none were introduced
and only 8% were therophytes.
5.2.2. Falckia oblonga Subcommunity
Although no diagnostic species were recorded for this
subcommunity, it is characterised by the formation of
small but dense mats of the small, rhizomatous forb,
Falckia oblonga (species group X, Table 1) in areas
where water drainage is faster (Figure 2), and where
Rumex conglomeratus is absent. Although Falckia oblon-
ga was also found on bare areas on the higher slopes of
dry vleis, as was suggested by Louw (1951), they are
always dominated by the invasive grass, Cynodon dacty-
lon, in these areas. It is possible that Falckia oblonga
finds refuge in the wetter areas, where Cynodon dactylon
has not established so extensively. An average of 10
species per sample plot was recorded of which 34% were
introduced and only 4% were therophytes.
5.3. Leersia hexandra Wetland Community
This community was encountered in shallow depres-
sions or pools which are seasonally waterlogged in the
O.RM. Prozesky Bird Sanctuary and occasionally in
water on the river’s edge in the Arboretum, but never in
deep water (Figure 2). Although no diagnostic species
were recorded, this community is characterised by the
high cover of rhizomatous grass species such as Leersia
hexandra (species group Z, Table 1) and Stenotaphrum
secundatum (species group X, Table 1). Other species
include the tall-growing sedge, Cyperus longus and the
forb Ranunculus multifidus (species group X, Table 1),
as well as the low-growing sedge, Carex schlechteri
(species group V, Table 1). An average number of 10
species was recorded per sample plot of which 33% were
introduced and only 13% were therophytes.
A similar community, the Leersia hexandra-Schoeno-
plectus paludicola Wetland was described by Fuls et al.
(1992) for the northern Free State.
6. Cyperus fastigiatus-Paspalum distichum Wetland
Community
This community sometimes occurs on the river’s
edge, but is mainly associated with shallow to deep
drainage depressions or pools which are seasonally
waterlogged (Figure 2). In pools where water is stagnant
for long periods, this community is mainly situated at the
edges. The soils on which this community can be found
are vertic soils of the Rensburg soil form, but occasion-
ally also on the Champagne soil form.
The diagnostic species are the tall-growing sedge,
Cyperus fastigiatus (species group Y, Table 1). The dom-
inant species is the rhizomatous grass Paspalum dis-
tichum (species group BB, Table 1) which form very
dense mats, and tends to grow in deeper water as well.
Louw (1951) made the observation in the Vaal River that
when this grass migrates to deeper water, its robustness
increases and it behaves like a floating aquatic species.
This community shows an affinity with the Leersia hexa-
ndra Community of the Cyperus longus Major Wetland
Community, because of the presence of the grass, Leer-
sia hexandra and the forb Rumex lanceolatus (species
group Z, Table 1). The Cyperus fastigiatus-Paspalum
distichum Wetland Community differs, however, from
the Leersia hexandra Community with respect to the
habitat and the fact that the tall-growing sedge Cyperus
longus, is replaced by another tall-growing sedge,
Cyperus fastigiatus.
Other species occurring in this community which is
worth mentioning are the water fern Marsilea capensis
and the tall-growing forb Persicaria lapathifolia (Table
2: under the heading, no specific communities). An aver-
age number of only six species was recorded per sample
plot of which 26% were introduced and none were thero-
phytes.
226
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
A similar community with an equally low species
diversity, the Paspalum distichum Community associat-
ed with marshes, was described in the Grootvlei area in
the eastern Transvaal (Myburgh et al. 1995).
7. Schoenoplectus corymbosus Community
This community is situated in deeper water in the
Mooi River as well as in deep depressions or pools with
stagnant water on the Champagne soil form (Figure 2).
The diagnostic species is the tall-growing, robust sedge
Schoenoplectus corymbosus (species group AA, Table
1). Occasionally the rhizomatous grass, Paspalum dis-
tichum (species group BB, Table 1) invades from the
river banks into this community. No other species were
recorded in this community.
8. Eleocharis palustris Wetland Community
This community is relatively undisturbed and occurs
only on the city margin, in the Arboretum. It is situated
on vertic soils which are seasonally waterlogged in bot-
tomland areas fringing the reedswamps (Figure 2).
The diagnostic species of this community are the
sedge, Eleocharis palustris and the forbs, Chironia pal-
ustris, Samolus valerandi and Lobelia thermalis (species
group CC, Table I ). The forb Chironia palustris, when
flowering in summer, transforms this specific communi-
ty into a conspicuous and aesthetically pleasing pink
mass, which was encountered nowhere else in the study
area. Although the Eleocharis palustris Community is
situated in the same type of habitat in which the Berulci
erecta Community occurs in other wetlands, there is no
real affinity between these two communities regarding
species composition. Eleocharis palustris, does, however,
have an isolated distribution in the Berula erecta Com-
munity. An average number of 14 species was recorded
per sample plot of which 17% were introduced and 5%
were therophytes.
9. Carex acutiformis Wetland Community
This particularly species-poor community occurs in
two of the three marshland areas (Figure 2), namely the
Arboretum and Van der Hoff Park, as well as in other
areas along the Mooi River, where it is associated with
the Typha capensis Reedswamp Community. It either
forms a narrow fringe along the reedswamps in water-
logged areas on the Champagne soil form, or it estab-
lishes in dense clumps on seasonally waterlogged, high-
er-lying areas on the Rensburg soil form. This communi-
ty seems to invade the Berula erecta Community and the
Eleocharis palustris Community.
The diagnostic and dominant, and most of the time the
only species occurring in this community is the sedge,
Carex acutiformis (species group DD, Table 1 ). All other
species which were recorded are species from adjacent
wetland communities.
10. Typha capensis Reedswamp Community
This community which occupies large areas on sea-
sonally or permanently waterlogged soils (Figure 2) was
regarded by Louw (1951) as one of the important con-
stituents of the reedswamps, together with Phragmites
australis. The Typha capensis Community, when occur-
ring together with the Phragmites australis Community,
is always situated on its outside in shallower water, act-
ing as a pioneer in reedswamp succession in some cases.
The Typha capensis Community seems to expand rapid-
ly into other communities such as the Berula erecta
Community. It occurs on the Champagne soil form but
also on vertic soils such as the Rensburg and Arcadia soil
forms. It was observed in wetlands all over the world that
small-seeded anemochorous plants such as Typha
species, colonise mudflats during periods of drawdown,
as well as areas that have been recently disturbed
(Ellison & Bedford 1995).
The diagnostic species of this community is the indige-
nous, rhizomatous bulrush Typha capensis and to a lesser
extent, the forb Hydrocotyle verticillata (species group
EE, Table 1). Other species which only occurred once in
this study includes the indigenous species Kniphofia ensi-
folia (Table 2: under the heading, no specific communi-
ties), which is situated at the edge of the Typha capensis
Reedswamp Community. An average number of only six
species was recorded per sample plot of which 27% were
introduced and 17% were therophytes.
1 1 . Phragmites australis Reedswamp Community
The Phragmites australis Reedswamp Community is
mainly situated in permanently waterlogged areas, some-
times in water as deep as 2 m, in the river bed and in all
three marshland areas (Figure 2). It colonises, together
with the Typha capensis Community, also seasonally
waterlogged and even higher-lying bare areas along the
river. These bare areas are formed due to the destabilisa-
tion of substrates in the inner city after heavy rains, when
water collects in larger volumes and passes through more
quickly than usual.
The dominant and only diagnostic species of this
community is the tall-growing reed Phragmites australis
(species group FF, Table 1). Other species occurring on
the edge of this community are ruderal species or species
of adjacent wetland communities. This community can
easily be distinguished from the other community in the
reedswamp, the Typha capensis Commnunity, as it grows
much higher (> 3 m) and is much denser in certain areas.
The very dense growth of Phragmites australis may
block waterways which lead to water stagnation and pro-
vide breeding places for mosquitoes and bilharzia snails
(Marks et al. 1994; Bromilow 1995). An average number
of five species was recorded per sample plot of which
55% were introduced and 44% were therophytes.
A similar community, the Phragmites australis Vlei
was described by Bloem et al. (1993) in the North-east-
ern Sandy Highvcld, Transvaal..
12. Azolla filiculoides Floating Community
The Azolla filiculoides Floating Community invades
stagnant water in depressions, pools and drainage canals
in some of the wetland areas in Potchefstroom (Figure
2). The only species in this community is the perennial,
mat-forming, free-floating, aquatic fern Azolla filicu-
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
227
FIGURE 3. — Relative positions of
plant communities along first
two axes of ordination of wet-
land plant communities in Pot-
chefstroom Municipal Area,
North-West, South Africa.
hides (species group GG, Table 1). This species is a
declared invader and is regarded as one of the most dan-
gerous invaders of water bodies in temperate regions in
southern Africa (Henderson 1995). This species was not
mentioned by Louw (1951) in his study of the vegetation
of the Potchefstroom area, but none of the floating or
submerged plants observed by him were recorded in the
study area.
Ordination
Figure 3 represents the distribution of 98 of the 102
releves along the first and second axes of a DECORANA
ordination. Although the releves of the Carex acutiformis
Wetland Community and the Azolla filiculoides Floating
Community are excluded from Figure 3, they show a
very clear discontinuity with each other and with all the
other communities. This discontinuity was verified by
the ordination of the total data set which is not presented
in this paper.
With the exception of the subcommunities of the Salix
babylonica Community (Community 1) and the subcom-
munities and variants of the Cichorium intybus-Xan-
thium strumarium Invasive Community (Community
5.1), the different plant units are restricted to specific
spatial areas as shown in the scatter diagram (Figure 3).
The diagram also illustrates a gradient along ordination
axis 1 which could be related to depth of the soil water
table (position in the whole wetland system, and ability
to establish in deep water). Depth of the water table
could have a major influence on the distribution pattern
of vegetation (Eckhardt et at. 1993b). The communities
found under extreme conditions, namely away from
water or in water, occur on the periphery of the diagram
(Figure 3). The grassland communities (Communities 3
and 4) which occur on the higher-lying areas, fringing
the marshlands and the Salix babylonica Community
(Community 1) which occurs on the river banks are situ-
ated at the left of the scatter diagram. Communities
which typically establish in shallow to deep water
(Commmunities 6, 7, 10 and 1 1) are situated to the right
of the diagram. The Cyperus longus Major Wetland
Community (Community 5) is situated in an intermedi-
ate position on the scatter diagram (Figure 3) which indi-
cates that the communities, subcommunities and variants
of this major community may establish on higher-lying
drier areas as well as in lower-lying areas which are sea-
sonally waterlogged. Another community in an interme-
diate position is the Amaranthus hybridus-Pennisetum
clandestinum Ruderal Community (Community 2)
which is situated very close to the other degraded com-
munity, the Cichorium intybus—Xanthium strumarium
Invasive Community (Community 5.1) (Figure 3). The
Eleocharis palustris Wetland Community (Community
8) which occurs in the same type of habitat than the
Berula erecta Community (Community 5.2) but in less
disturbed marshlands, is also situated in an intermediate
position, close to the Berula erecta Community.
In ordinations which were separately performed on
the Salix babylonica Woodland Community (Commu-
nity 1 ) and the Cichorium intybus-Xanthium strumarium
Invasive Community (Community 5.1), none of the sub-
communities and variants were clearly distinguished
from each other.
CONCLUSION
The establishment of many of the wetland communi-
ties is the result of direct or indirect anthropogenic influ-
ences. The large areas covered by communities such as
the Salix babylonica Community show the great long-
term impact of man on the structure and species compo-
sition of wetland plant communities. The yearly expan-
sion of the Cynodon dactylon Invasive Community indi-
cates the degraded condition of the urban wetlands in
Potchefstroom, mainly because of the indiscriminate use
of these areas for cattle and horse grazing.
Some of the communities described in urban wetlands
in this study are to a certain extent, similar to those wet-
land communities described by Kooij et al. (1991); Fuls
et al. (1992); Bloem et al. (1993); Eckhardt et al.
228
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
(1993a); Myburgh et al. (1995) and Smit et al. (1995), in
natural wetland areas. The range and intensity of distur-
bances in certain areas of the Potchcfstroom urban wet-
land, as well as the scale on which the current study was
done, probably permitted the recognition of more com-
munities which may also form small mosaics with each
other. In none of the mentioned studies on natural wet-
lands, was the abundance of the invasive grass, Cynodon
dactylon so profound, as in the current study.
Variations in those plant communities which could be
related to specific environmental conditions are mainly
ascribed to river bank wetness, period of wetness, depth
of soil water table, soil type and drainage tempo of soil.
With the exception of the anthropogenous soil form,
Witbank, all the other soils are deep, poorly drained soils
with high clay contents. No correlation between the dif-
ferent plant communities and data from either physical or
chemical soil analyses, were found.
The present study should be used as the basis for
future management and conservation of urban wetlands
in Potchefstroom, and it should also lead to the develop-
ment of a Metropolitan Open Space System (MOSS) net-
work for Potchefstroom. The development of such a net-
work, together with the involvement of the public in the
conservation of the wetlands may prove to be the salva-
tion of the Potchefstroom wetlands. One important
aspect that should immediately be addressed in the man-
agement of these wetlands is the termination of all mow-
ing and grazing practises, and the careful monitoring of
any successional changes in the vegetation, to be able to
assess the exact influence these grazing and mowing
practises have on the vegetation.
The classification and description of the wetland
communities in the Potchefstroom Municipal Area also
serve as a basis for further studies in urban wetlands.
Future research must concentrate more specifically on
the conservation status and ecological importance of cer-
tain species and plant communities, the vegetation
dynamics of wetland ecosystems under specific human
influences and habitat changes, and the effect of certain
toxic agents (ecotoxicology) on wetlands. All this infor-
mation can eventually be used in the development of a
model, such as the one of Ellison & Bedford (1995),
which can predict the consequences of anthropogenic
disturbances in wetlands.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The first author wishes to thank the Potchefstroom
University for funding this project; Prof. A.J.H. Pieterse,
Head of the Department of Plant and Soil Sciences,
Potchefstroom University for valuable comments on the
text; Dr H. Bezuidenhout, Scientific Services, National
Parks Board for the provision of the BBPC programme
which was used for the analysis of the floristic data; Mr
E van Wyk, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences,
Potchefstroom University for technical assistance; and
the National Herbarium, Pretoria and Mr B. Ubhink,
Botanical Garden, Potchefstroom University, for plant
identification.
REFERENCES
ARCHIBALD, R. E. M. & BATCHELOR, A.L. 1992. Let wetlands pu-
rify your water. Muniviro 9,1 : 7.
ARNOLD, T.H. & DE WET, B.C. 1993. Plants of southern Africa:
names and distribution. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of
South Africa No. 62: 1-825.
BEHR, C M. & BREDENKAMP, G.J 1988. A phytosociological clas-
sification of Witwatersrand Botanical Garden. South African
Journal of Botany 54: 525-533
BEZUIDENHOUT, H. 1993. Syntaxonomy and synecology of western
Transvaal grasslands . Ph. D. thesis. University of Pretoria.
BEZUIDENHOUT, H. & BREDENKAMP, G.J. 1991 The vegetation
of the Be land type in the western Transvaal grassland. South
Africa. Phytocoenologia 19: 497-518.
BEZUIDENHOUT, H , BREDENKAMP, G.J. & THERON, G.K. 1994a.
Phytosociological classes of the western Transvaal grassland.
South Africa. Koedoe 37,1: 1-18.
BEZUIDENHOUT, H„ BREDENKAMP, G.J. & THERON, G.K. 1994b.
Syntaxonomy of the vegetation of the Fb land type in the west-
ern Transvaal grassland. South Africa. South African Journal of
Botany 60: 72-8 I.
BEZUIDENHOUT, H , BIGGS, H.C. & BREDENKAMP, G.J. 1996. A
process supported by the utility BBPC for analysing Braun-
Blanquet data on a personal computer. Koedoe 39,1 : 107-1 12.
BLOEM, K.J., THERON, G.K. & VAN ROOYEN, N. 1993. Wetland
plant communities of the Verlorenvallei Nature Reserve in the
North-eastern Sandy Highveld, Transvaal. South African Jour-
nal of Botany 59: 281-286.
BREDENKAMP, G.J. & THERON, G.K. 1978. A synecological ac-
count of the Suikerbosrand Nature Reserve. 1. The phytosociol-
ogy of the Witwatersrand geological system. Bothalia 12: 513-
529.
BREDENKAMP, G.J. & VAN ROOYEN, N. 1996. Dry Sandy
Highveld Grassland. In A.B. Low & A.G. Rebelo, Vegetation of
South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland : 41, 42. Department of
Environmental Affairs & Tourism, Pretoria.
BREDENKAMP, G.J , JOUBERT, A.F. & BEZUIDENHOUT, H. 1989.
A reconnaissance survey of the vegetation of the plains in
Potchefstroom-Fochville-Parys area. South African Journal of
Botany 55: 199-206.
BROMILOW, C. 1995. Problem plants of South Africa. Briza Publi-
cations, Pretoria.
CATALLO, W.J. 1993. Ecotoxicology and wetland ecosystems: current
understanding and future needs. Environmental Toxicology and
Chemistry 12: 2209-2224.
CILLIERS, S.S. & BREDENKAMP, G.J. in press. Vegetation analysis
of railway reserves in the Potchefstroom Municipal Area, North-
West Province, South Africa. South African Journal of Botany.
COOPER, K.H. & DUTH1E, A. 1992. MOSS soothes city nerves.
Muniviro 9,1: 4.
COWAN, G.I. 1995. South Africa and the Ramsar Convention. In G.I.
Cowan, Wetlands of South Africa : 1-11. Department of En-
vironmental Affairs & Tourism, Pretoria.
ECKHARDT, H.C., VAN ROOYEN, N. & BREDENKAMP, G.J 1993a.
Wetland plant communities of the Vrede-Memel-Warden area,
northeastern Orange Free State. Navorsinge van die Nasionale
Museum Bloemfontein 9: 245-262.
ECKHARDT, H.C., VAN ROOYEN, N. & BREDENKAMP, G.J. 1993b.
The vegetation of the northeastern Orange Free State, South
Africa. Bothalia 23: 1 17-127.
EDWARDS, D. 1983. A broad-scale structural classification of vegeta-
tion for practical purposes. Bothalia 14: 1 1-18.
ELLISON, A M. & BEDFORD, B.L. 1995. Response of a wetland vas-
cular plant community to disturbance: a simulation study. Eco-
logical Applications 5: 109-123.
FRIEDEL, M.H 1987. A preliminary investigation of the woody plant
increase in the western Transvaal and implications for veld
assessment. Journal of the Grassland Society of southern Africa
4: 25-30.
FULS, E.R., BREDENKAMP, G.J & VAN ROOYEN, N. 1992. The
hydrophyllic vegetation of the Vredefort-Kroonstad-Lindley-
Heilbron area, northern Orange Free State. South African Jour-
nal of Botany 58: 231-235.
HENDERSON, L 1991 . Alien invasive Salix spp. (willows) in the Grass-
land Biorne of South Africa. South African Forestry Journal
157: 91-95.
HENDERSON, L. 1995. Plant invaders of southern Africa. Plant Pro-
tection Research Institute Handbook No. 5, Pretoria.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
229
HENNEKENS, S.M. 1996a. TURBOVEG: software package for input,
processing, and presentation of phytosociological data. IBN-
DLO, University of Lancaster.
HENNEKENS, S.M. 1996b. MEGATAB: a visual editor for phytosoci-
ological tables. Giesen & Geurts, Ulft.
HILL, M.O. 1979a. TWINSPAN: a Fortran program for arranging
multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification
of individuals and attributes. Cornell University, Ithaca, New
York.
HILL, M.O. 1979b. DECORANA: a Fortran program for detrended
correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. Cornell
University, Ithaca, New York.
KOOIJ, M.S., SCHEEPERS, J.C., BREDENKAMP, G.J. & THERON,
G.K. 1991. The vegetation of the Kroonstad area, Orange Free
State I: Vlei and bottomland communities. South African
Journal of Botany 57: 213-219.
LOUW, W.J. 1951. An ecological account of the vegetation of the
Potchefstroom area. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South
Africa No. 24: 1-105.
MARKS, M., LAPIN, B. & RANDALL, J. 1994. Phragmites australis
IP. communis)', threats, management and monitoring. Natural
Areas Journal 14,4: 85-294.
MUELLER-DOMBOIS, D. & ELLENBERG, H 1974. Aims and
methods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, New York.
MYBURGH, W.J., BREYTENBACH. P.J.J.’, BREDENKAMP, G.J. &
THERON, G.K. 1995. Die vleiplantegroei in die Grootvlei-
Villiers-omgewing, Oos-Transvaal. Die Suid-Afrikaanse
Tydskrif vir Natuurwetenskap en Tegnologie 14,2: 48-54.
NEL, L.T.. TRUTER, F.C. & WILLEMSE, J. 1939. The geology of the
country around Potchefstroom and Klerksdorp. An explanation
of sheet 61. Geological Survey, Union of South Africa, De-
partment of Mines.
ROBERTS, D C. 1993. D'MOSS — urban ecology in action. Muniviro
10,3:3-16.
RUTHERFORD, M.C. & WESTFALL, R.H 1994. Biomes of southern
Africa — an objective categorization, 2nd edn. Memoirs of the
Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 63: 1-94.
SMIT, C M., BREDENKAMP, G.J. & VAN ROOYEN, N. 1995. The
vegetation of the upper Klip River valley in the northeastern
Orange Free State. Navorsinge van die Nasionale Museum
Bloemfontein 11,3: 37-58.
SOIL CLASSIFICATION WORK GROUP. 1991. Soil classification—
a taxonomic system for South Africa, 2nd edn. Department of
Agricultural Development, Pretoria.
STARFINGER, U. & SUKOPP, H. 1994. The assessment of urban
biotopes for nature conservation. In E.A. Cook & H.N. Van
Lier, Landscape planning and ecological networks : 89-115.
Elsevier, Amsterdam.
WALMSLEY, R.D. 1988. A description of the wetlands research pro-
gramme. South African National Scientific Programmes Report
No. 145: 1-26.
WEATHER BUREAU. 1988. Climate of South Africa. Report No. 40.
Government Printer, Pretoria.
WELLS, M.J., BALSINHAS, A. A., JOFFE. H.. ENGELBRECHT,
V.M.. HARDING, G. & STIRTON, C H. 1986. A catalogue of
problem plants in southern Africa, incorporating the National
Weed List of South Africa. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of
South Africa No. 53: 1-658.
WILLIAMS, M. 1990. Understanding wetlands. In M. Williams, Wet-
lands: a threatened landscape: 1 — 4 1 . The Alden Press, Oxford.
Bothalia 28,2: 231-238 (1998)
Cytogenetic studies in the genus Pentaschistis (Poaceae: Arundinoideae)
K.C. KLOPPER*, JJ. SPIES*f and B. VISSER*
Keywords: chromosomes, meiosis, Pentaschistis, polyploidy
ABSTRACT
Cytogenetic studies of 45 specimens, representing 16 taxa of the genus Pentaschistis (Nees) Spach confirmed two basic
chromosome numbers (x = 7, 13) for the genus. Chromosome numbers for five species and one subspecies are described
for the first time, i.e. P. airoides subsp . jugorum (n = 2x = 14), P. colorata (n = 2x = 14), P. densifolia (n = x = 7), P. lima
(n = 6x = ± 42), P. rigidissima (n = x = 7, n = 3x = 21) and P. viscidula (n = 3x = 21). Polyploidy occurs frequently and
new ploidy levels are described in four of the species, namely P. airoides (Nees) Stapf subsp, airoides (n = 3x = 21), P. cir-
rhulosa (Thunb.) McClean (n = x = 7), P. eriostoma (Nees) Stapf (n = 3x = 39+0-4B) and P. rupestris (n = 4x = 28). The
majority of species form young polyploid complexes. There seems to be no correlation between cytogenetic data and mor-
phological groupings within Pentaschistis.
INTRODUCTION
The genus Pentaschistis (Nees) Spach consists of 68
species (Linder & Ellis 1990) of which 57 are indigenous
and 40 endemic to South Africa (Gibbs Russell et al.
1990). Cytogenetic studies reveal that Pentaschistis has
basic chromosome numbers of 7 and 13 (De Wet 1954;
Hedberg 1957; De Wet 1960; Hedberg & Hedberg 1977;
Davidse et al. 1986; Spies & Du Plessis 1988; Du Plessis
& Spies 1988, 1992; Spies et al. 1994).
The aim of this study was to determine whether the
cytogenetic studies support the morphological groupings
of Linder & Ellis (1990) and Ellis & Linder (1990); to
determine the degree of polyploidy in the genus and to
use ploidy levels to determine the age of the polyploid
complexes in the genus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The material used during this study was collected in
the field. Voucher herbarium specimens are housed in the
Geo Potts Herbarium, Bloemfontein (BLFU) and/or in
the National Herbarium. Pretoria (PRE).
Young inflorescences were collected and fixed in
Carnoy’s fixative (Carnoy 1886). The fixative was
replaced by 70% (v/v) ethanol 24-48 hours after fixa-
tion. Anthers were squashed in 2% (m/v) aceto-carmine
(Darlington & La Cour 1976). Slides were permanently
mounted by freezing them with liquid COi (Bowen
1956), followed by dehydration in ethanol and mounting
in Euparal. At least twenty cells per specimen were stud-
ied for each meiotic stage, except where otherwise indi-
cated.
With the annotation of chromosome numbers we fol-
lowed the example set by the series 'Index to plant chro-
mosome numbers’ (Goldblatt 1981), where chromosome
* Department of Botany and Genetics, University of the Orange Free
State, P.O Box 339, 9300 Bloemfontein,
t To whom correspondence should be addressed.
MS. received: 1997-09-15.
numbers derived from meiotic studies are presented as
the gametic (n) number and chromosomes from mitotic
studies as the somatic (2n) chromosome number. The
average number of chiasmata per bivalent was consid-
ered to be the number of chiasmata per chromosome and
were calculated by dividing the mathematical average of
the chiasmata per cell by the haploid chromosome num-
ber of the plant. Chromosome configurations were cal-
culated as the average number of each configuration per
cell. The number of B-chromosomes is presented as the
minimum and maximum number of B-chromosomes
observed per cell. The numerical values of the chromo-
some abnormalities were obtained by calculating the
average number of a certain abnormality per cell.
Genomic relationships were calculated according to the
models of Kimber & Alonso (1981).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Forty five specimens, representing the different
groups in Pentaschistis, except Group 5, have been stud-
ied. The results are presented alphabetically in table form
for each group (Table 1).
Number of specimens per ploidy level
All published ploidy levels (Hedberg 1957; De Wet
1960; Tateoka 1965a & b; Davidse et al. 1986; Du
Plessis & Spies 1988; Spies & Du Plessis 1988; Du
Plessis & Spies 1992; Spies et al. 1994) were used to
determine the number of specimens per ploidy level
among the different species of the genus Pentaschistis.
The frequency of specimens per ploidy level was also
plotted for the two different basic chromosome numbers
in Pentaschistis (Figure 4).
Meiotic analyses of the different Pentaschistis species
revealed haploid chromosome numbers of seven, multiples
of seven (Figures 1, 2), thirteen and multiples thereof
(Figure 3). The low number of species with a basic chromo-
some number of thirteen can be attributed to the fact that
only specimens from South Africa have been studied. All
species with a basic chromosome number of thirteen, except
P. eriostoma, grow in central Africa (Du Plessis & Spies
232
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
TABLE 1. — List of Pentaschistis specimens studied with their respective gametic chromosome numbers, ploidy levels, figures where they are
shown, localities and voucher specimens
Gametic
Bothalia 28,2(1998)
233
TABLE 1. — List of Pentaschistis specimens studied with their respective gametic chromosome numbers, ploidy levels, figures where they are
shown, localities and voucher specimens (cont.)
Gametic
Group Taxon Chromosome Ploidy Figure
no.
Locality and vouchers
1992). The basic chromosome number of seven predomi-
nates in the southern African species, whereas x = 1 3 pre-
vails in the remainder of Africa (Du Plessis & Spies 1992).
Polyploidy is common in the genus Pentaschistis.
Nineteen of the 45 specimens studied were polyploid.
Higher ploidy levels were detected in some of the cells
of these specimens. This could be caused by cell fusion
(Spies & Van Wyk 1995) which is not uncommon in the
genus Pentaschistis (Figure 5).
Pentaschistis airoides subsp. jugorum and P. colorata
were tetraploid. The genome homology of these two
species was determined and the observed chromosome
configurations corresponded best with the expected values
for the 2:2 model (Table 2) of Kimber & Alonso ( 1 98 1 ). It
indicates that two sets of genomes are present and each set
consists of two genomes. The relative similarity of the
genomes within a set is 0.5 and the relative affinity
between the sets is expressed by an x-value, which may
vary between 0.5 (differences between sets are similar to
differences within a set) and one (sets are totally different)
(Kimber & Alonso 1981). The x-values for the specimens
studied were one or tending towards one (Table 2), thus
indicating little to no homology between the two sets of
genomes (for example AABB). Based on the specimens
used during this study, these species are alloploid.
However, because of the occurrence of an occasional
quadrivalent, P. colorata may be classified as a segmental
allotetraploid. The occurrence of quadrivalents indicates
that the genomes of this species correspond to some
extent.
FIGURE 1. — Meiotic chromosomes in Pentaschistis. A, B, P. airoides subsp. airoides: A, Spies 4388, diakinesis, n = 21, 21nR; B, Spies 4388.
diakinesis, n = 14, 10hr, 4„k. C, P. capillaris. Spies 3810 , diakinesis, n = 7, 7nR; D, P. cirrhulosa. Spies 4627, diakinesis, n = 7, 5hr, 2hk;
E, P. densifolia. Spies 3878a., diakinesis, n = 7, 6uR, lux; F, P. pallida. Spies 5368, diakinesis, n = 7+3B, 7nR, lm. G, H, P. tomentella: G,
Spies 4306, diakinesis, n = 7, 5mr, 2hK: H, Spies 3782, diakinesis, n = 14, 8hr, 6nx. Scale bar: 8.5 mm.
234
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 2. — Meiotic chromsomes in Pentaschistis. A, P. aristidoides, Spies 5320, metaphase I, n = 7, 6r R, lnK; B, C, P. triseta, Spies 4413,
metaphase I, n = 7, 6n r, Irk D, E, P. rigidissima: D, Spies 5431, diakinesis, n = 7+0-2B, 6hr, Ihk; E, Spies 4388, metaphase I, n = 21,
1 4n R, 5hk, 1 iv r F, P curvifolia, Spies 4443, diakinesis, n = 7, 7hr G, H, Pentaschistis spp: G, Spies 5336, diakinesis, n = 7+0-2B, 7ur,
1 ii k; H, Spies 5768, anaphase I, n = 7+2B. Scale bar: 8.5 mm.
The genome homology of the tetraploid specimens of
P. pallida was determined. The observed and expected
values corresponded best to the 2:2 model for two of the
specimens, namely Spies 3828 and 5292, with x-values
of one or tending towards one (Table 2). This indicates
that little or no homology exists between the two sets of
genomes, thus classifying these specimens as allote-
traploids (for example AABB). However, the occurrence
of quadrivalents indicates that the genomes of this
species do correspond to some extent. Therefore, Spies
3828 is classified as a segmental allotetraploid (AAA’A1)
with a x-value of 0.7 (Table 2).
FIGURE 3. — Meiotic chromsomes in P.
eriostoma. A, Spies 5470, metaphase
I, n = 13+0-2B; B, Spies 4390,
anaphase I, n = 13+0-3B. C, D, Spies
5337\ C, metaphase I, n = 26; D,
anaphase I, n = 26. E, Spies 5319,
metaphase I, n = 39+0-4B. Scale bar:
8.5 mm.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
235
2x 4 x 6x 7x 8x 1 2x 1 3x
Ploidy levels
FIGURE 4. — Comparison of the
number of specimens per
ploidy level for the two exist-
ing basic chromosome num-
bers in Pentaschistis species.
The observed and expected values for the other two
P. pallida specimens ( Spies 3859 and 5381) correspond-
ed best to the 2:1:1 model, with x-values of 0.8 and 1
respectively (Table 2). The 2:1:1 model indicates that
three sets of genomes are present, one set consists of
two genomes and the other two of one genome each.
The x-values for the specimens studied were one or
tending towards one (Table 2), indicating little or no
homology among the three sets of genomes (for exam-
ple AABC or AABB'). However, because of the occur-
.rence of quadrivalents in these two specimens ( Spies
3859 and 5381 ) they are classified as segmental allote-
traploids (AAA'A"). Therefore, the specimens of P. pal-
lida are either alloploids or segmental alloploids tending
towards alloploidy (for example AABB, AABC, AABB'
or AAA'A”). The two different genomic constitutions for
this species may indicate that there is a high degree of
variation within the species.
In P. eriostoma (Figure 3A-E) three different ploidy
levels were detected, namely diploid, tetraploid and
hexaploid, that correspond with the published literature
(Spies & Du Plessis 1988; Du Plessis & Spies 1992).
Heptaploidy was also observed by Du Plessis & Spies
(1992). In the diploid (n = x = 13) specimens of P. erios-
toma 13 bivalents were observed. The genome homolo-
gy of the tetraploid specimens of P. eriostoma was deter-
mined. The observed and expected values corresponded
best to the 2:1:1 model with an x-value of 0.9 (Table 2),
indicating that little homology exists among the three
sets of genomes. This species is thus an allotetraploid
species (for example AABC). However, a low frequency
of quadrivalents occurred in the tetraploid, indicating
that the genomes of this species do correspond to some
extent. Pentaschistis eriostoma is, therefore, classified as
a segmental allotetraploid (for example AAA'A").
All the existing chromosome data of Pentaschistis
was used to determine the number of specimens per
species per ploidy level. The number of specimens per
ploidy level of the two different basic chromosome num-
bers was also determined (Figure 4). This was done to
determine the degree of maturity (it is the ratio between
diploid and polyploid specimens, as well as the level of
polyploidy) in the polyploid complexes in the different
species and in representatives of the two basic chromo-
some numbers.
The Pentaschistis species vary from young to old
polyploid complexes. Most species studied (P airoides
subsp. airoides, P. aristidoides , P. aurea subsp. aurea,
P. borussica, P. capillaris, P. cirrhulosa , P. curvifolia,
P. densifolia, P. eriostoma, P. natalensis , P. pallida,
P. papillosa, P. patula, P. rigidissima, P. tomentella.
TABLE 2. — Genomic relationships in tetraploid Pentaschistis specimens according to the models of Kimber & Alonso (1981). Values indi-
cate sum of squares between observed and expected values for each model; whereas values in parentheses indicate x-values for each model
Accepted model
236
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 5. — Initial stages of cell fusion in Pentaschistis. A, P. airoides subsp. airoides , Spies 4388, n = 21; B, P. cirrhulosa, Spies 4627, n = 7;
C, P. lima, Ellis 5422, n = ± 42. D, E, P pallida: D, Spies 3860, n = 14; E, Spies 5381 , n = 14. F, P. eriostoma, Spies 3850, n = 13+0-2B.
Scale bar: 8.5 mm.
FIGURE 6. — Mciotic chromosomes in Pentaschistis with univalents. A, B, P. pallida: A, Spies 4406, diakinesis with 3 univalents, n = 7+0-1 B;
B, Spies 5381 , diakinesis with 5 univalents, n = 7. C, P. cirrhulosa. Spies 4627, metaphase I with 2 univalents, n = 7. D, E, P. eriostoma:
D, Spies 5319, metaphase I with 3 univalents, n = 39+0-4B; E, Spies 5339, metaphase I with 1 univalent, n = 26+0-2B. F, Pentaschistis
spp, Spies 5768, metaphase I with 1 univalent, n = 7+0-2B. Scale bar: 8.5 mm.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
237
FIGURE 7. — Meiotic chromosomes in Pentaschistis specimens with abnormalities. A, G, P. eriostoma , Spies 5319: A, anaphase I cell with five lag-
ging chromosomes; G, telophase I cells with micronuclei, n = 39+0-4B. B, P. tomentella. Spies 3773, anaphase I bridge, n = 7. C, D, P
rigidissima: C, Spies 5431, anaphase 1 bridge, n = 7+0-2B; D, Spies 5458, anaphase II bridge, n = 21 . E, F, H, telophase I cells with micronu-
clei: E, P. pallida. Spies 5393, n = 7; F, P triseta. Spies 4413, n = 7; H, Pentaschistis spp.. Spies 5768, n -- 7+0-2B. Scale bar: 8.5 mm.
P. triseta, P. tortuosa, ) were young polyploid complex-
es. In a young polyploid complex diploidy prevails, but
higher levels of ploidy do occur (Grant 1981). Poly-
ploidy prevails in the mature polyploid complexes, but
diploidy still occurs. No evidence of mature polyploidy
was found.
In old polyploid complexes only polyploid levels are
observed (Grant 1981). A few species (P. airoides subsp.
jugorum ; P. argentea ; P. aristifolia', P. barbata subsp.
barbata\ P. colorata\ P. lima', P. malouinensis', P. mannii ;
P. minor, P. aff. patula', P. rupestris & P. viscidula ), were
classified as old polyploid complexes. It is important to
note that in almost all the old polyploid species, only one
or a few specimens were examined. More specimens
should be studied to verify these hypotheses. The classi-
fication of young polyploid complexes is better support-
ed, since more specimens were examined. Representa-
tives of both the basic chromosome numbers (x = 7; x = 13)
were classified as young polyploid complexes, with sim-
ilar frequency ratios (Figure 4). The ploidy levels
obtained in this study, combined with existing data, sug-
gest that the genus Pentaschistis is a young polyploid
hybrid complex (Figure 4). Hybridisation could have
resulted in the formation of a basic chromosome number
of x = 13 for P. eriostoma and P. borussica. However,
morphological and anatomical data (Linder & Ellis
1990; Linder et al. 1990; Ellis & Linder 1990) supports
the inclusion of P. borussica in the genus Pentaschistis.
It is thus more probable that polyploidisation and subse-
quent aneuploidy of a Pentaschistis species, or hybridis-
ation between two different Pentaschistis species and
subsequent aneuploidy, resulted in P. borussica. This is
not true for P. eriostoma. Morphological and anatomical
data placed P. eriostoma in group 6. According to Linder
& Ellis (1990) and Ellis & Linder (1990) this is the group
of species with uncertain affinity. It is more probable that
P. eriostoma was formed by hybridisation of two unre-
lated species. Genomic in situ hybridisation (GISH)
analysis, using various putative parental genomes as
probes, should be used to determine the origin of the x =
1 3 basic chromosome number.
Univalents were observed in nearly all of the studied
specimens (Figure 6A-F). Lagging chromosomes were
observed during anaphase I in P. aristidoides, P. curvifo-
lia, P. eriostoma, P. lima, P. pallida, P. rigidissima, P.
rupestris, P. tomentella, P. viscidula and one of the two
unnamed Pentaschistis species (Figure 7A). A small
number of micronuclei (Figure 7E-H) was observed
throughout the whole genus Pentaschistis. Anaphase I or
II bridges (Figure 7B-D) were observed in five of the
specimens studied. This is most probably the result of
paracentric inversion. The frequency of these abnormal-
ities was so low that it should not affect the fertility of the
specimens.
In P. pallida ( Spies 4406), a diploid (n = 7+0-1 B), five
bivalents and one quadrivalent were observed. In this
diploid, seven bivalents are expected. A quadrivalent was
also observed in a diploid specimen of P. eriostoma ( Spies
5370). This phenomenon can be the result of a balanced
translocation. If complete pairing between the two non-
homologous chromosomes occurred, a quadrivalent would
result. Three types of division are possible during
anaphase I. If adjacent type I or II division occurred, there
would be no fertile pollen. During adjacent type I division,
the two centromeres belonging to non-homologous chro-
mosome pairs move to the one pole and the other two to
the other pole. During adjacent type II division, the two
centromeres from a homologous chromosome pair move
to each pole. If alternate type division occurred, all the
pollen would be fertile. During alternate type division, the
chiasmata of all the chromosome pairs lie on the
metaphase plate and the centromeres of the non-homolo-
gous pairs move to the same pole (Schulz-Shaeffer 1980).
238
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
The fertility of P. pallida ( Spies 4406) and P erios-
toma ( Spies 5370 ) pollen is thus dependent on the type of
division that occurs. All the material in our laboratory is
fixed after collection, so no pollen germination fertility
test could be done. More specimens of these two species
must be collected to study whether this phenomenon
occurs frequently or if it was a unique event.
In conclusion, although cytogenetic differences were
observed between the different species, the cytogenetic
data did not support or reject the groupings suggested by
Linder & Ellis (1990) and Ellis & Linder (1990). The
basic chromosome numbers of x = 7 and x = 13 suggest
that P eriostoma and P. borussica must be further
removed from the other Pentaschistis species. Since P
eriostoma shows little cytogenetic, morphologic or
anatomic similarity to the other species, we do suggest
that P. eriostoma is not closely related to the other
species of the genus Pentaschistis. The data also indicate
that most Pentaschistis species form young polyploid
complexes. Species classified as old polyploid complex-
es were usually inadequately studied.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Material received from Dr R.P. Ellis and the National
Botanical Institute is greatfully acknowledged. Ms
S.M.C. van Wyk is thanked for developing the photos
used in this paper. Financial support by the Foundation
for Research and Development and the University of the
Free State are also hereby acknowledged.
REFERENCES
BOWEN, C.C. 1956. Freezing by liquid carbon dioxide in making
slides permanent. Stain Technology 31: 87-90.
CARNOY, J B. 1886. La Cytodierese de l’oeuf. Cellule 3: 1-92.
DARLINGTON, C D. & LA COUR, L.F. 1976. The handling of chro-
mosomes. Allen & Unwin, London.
DAVIDSE, G , HOSHINO, T. & SIMON, B.K. 1986. Chromosome
counts of Zimbabwean grasses (Poaceae) and an analysis of
polyploidy in the grass flora of Zimbabwe. South African
Journal of Botany 52: 521-528.
DE WET, J.M.J 1954 The genus Danthonia in grass phylogeny.
American Journal of Botany 41 : 204-212.
DE WET, J.M.J. 1960. Chromosome numbers and some morphological
attributes of various South African grasses. American Journal
of Botany 47: 44-50.
DU PLESSIS, H. & SPIES, J.J. 1988. Chromosome studies on African
plants. 8. Bothalia 18: 119-122.
DU PLESSIS, H. & SPIES, J.J. 1992. Chromosome numbers in the genus
Pentaschistis (Poaceae, Danthonieae). Taxon 41 : 706- 720.
ELLIS, R.P. & LINDER, H P. 1990. Atlas of the leaf anatomy in
Pentaschistis (Arundinoideae: Poaceae). Memoirs of the Bota-
nical Survey of South Africa No. 60: 1-314.
GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E. WATSON, L. KOEKEMOER, M. SMOOK,
L., BARKER, N.P., ANDERSON, H.M. & DALLWITZ, M.J.
1990. Grasses of southern Africa. Memoirs of the Botanical
Survey of South Africa No. 58: 1-437.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1981. Index to plant chromosome numbers,
1975-1978. Monographs in Systematic Botany 5.
GRANT, V. 1981. Plant speciation, 2nd edn. Columbia University
Press, New York.
HEDBERG, I. & HEDBERG, O. 1977. Chromosome numbers of afro-
alpine and afromontane angiosperms. Botaniska Notiser 130:
1-24.
HEDBERG, O. 1957. Afro-alpine vascular plants. A taxonomic revi-
sion. Symbolae botanicae Upsaliensis 15: 1-411.
KIMBER, G. & ALONSO, L.C. 1981. The analysis of meiosis in
hybrids. III. Tetraploid hybrids. Canadian Journal of Genetics
and Cytology 23: 235-254.
LINDER, H P. & ELLIS, R.P. 1990. A revision of Pentaschistis
(Arundineae: Poaceae). Contributions from the Bolus Herba-
rium No. 12: 1-124.
LINDER, H P, THOMPSON, J.F., ELLIS, R.P. & PEROLD, S.M.
1990. The occurrence, anatomy, and systematic implications of
the glands in Pentaschistis and Prionanthium (Poaceae,
Arundinoideae, Arundineae). Botanical Gazette 151: 221-233.
SCHULZ-SCHAEFFER, J. 1980. Cytogenetics. Springer- Verlag, New
York.
SPIES, J.J. & DU PLESSIS, H. 1988. Chromosome studies on African
Plants. 6. Bothalia 17: 1 1 1-1 14.
SPIES, J.J., LINDER, H P, LABUSCHAGNE, I F. & DU PLESSIS, H.
1994. Cytogenetic evidence for the species delimitation of
Pentaschistis airoides and P. patula (Poaceae: Arundineae).
Procceedings of the XIII"' Plenary Meeting AETFAT. Zomba,
Malawi 1: 373-383.
SPIES, J.J. & VAN WYK, S.M.C. 1995. Cell fusion: a possible mech-
anism for the origin of polyploidy. South African Journal of
Botany 61 : 60-65.
TATEOKA, T. 1965a. Chromosome numbers of some east African
grasses. American Journal of Botany 52: 846-869.
TATEOKA, T. 1965b. Chromosome numbers of some grasses from
Madagascar. Botanical Magazine (Tokyo) 78: 306-31 1
Bothalia 28,2: 239-247 (1998)
OBITUARIES
DAVID SPENCER HARDY (193 1-1998)
Ah! like gold fall the leaves in the wind, long years numberless as the
wings of trees! The long years have passed like swift draughts of the
sweet mead in lofty halls of the West ... Farewell!
J.R.R. Tolkien: The Lord of the Rings
An era has ended for those of us who have an interest
in succulents or, indeed, in all living plants of southern
Africa of any kind. To us who knew him so well, Dave
Hardy (Figure 1) seemed ageless and, sometimes in more
ways than one, timeless; yet mortality has now also
claimed him. He passed away in Pretoria on the night of
31 May 1998 of complications after surgery.
David Spencer Hardy was bom in Pretoria on 24
September 1931. His education included only four sub-
jects at Matriculation level (i.e. not a full matriculation
certificate), which makes his subsequent achievements all
the more remarkable, and also shows that academic qual-
ifications are not always a reliable indicator of underlying
intelligence. He joined the Department of Agriculture on
21 February 1951 (Gunn & Codd 1981), when he was
appointed Technician at the Veterinary Research Institute,
Onderstepoort. In 1958 he was transferred to the Division
of Botany, which subsequently became the Botanical
Research Institute and in 1989 the National Botanical
Institute. Here he was responsible for cultivating living
plant material brought in from the field by scientists, and
in due course, by himself and his extraordinary circle of
friends, acquaintances and contacts. He displayed a par-
ticular aptitude for growing succulents and greenhouse
plants. Not only did he grow them, but he studied them in
minute and painstaking detail, observing their similarities
and differences both in appearance and cultural require-
ments (Figure 2). His dedication paid dividends: plants
that others declared impossible to cultivate away from
their natural habitat, grew, flourished and became com-
monplace for him.
Dave maintained two particularly ‘special’ areas in
the nursery at the Pretoria National Botanical Garden,
two purportedly identical greenhouses situated next to
each other. In one he assembled what was at its best the
finest collection of rare and endangered Madagascan
plants in the world. In the other he started, a few years
before he retired, to re-create his vision of the Namib
Desert: a Namib not to be found in the real world, where
one would have to travel many hundreds of kilometres to
see the plants that Dave managed to persuade to grow
right next to one another (Figure 3). It is fitting that what
he referred to as the Madagascar house now bears a brass
plaque reading:
The Hardy Collection of rare and endangered plants. Named for
David Spencer Hardy, plant collector and succulent grower
extraordinary.
During his career he collected extensively in the
northwestern Cape (Northern Cape Province: Namaqua-
land, Upington, Prieska, Richtersveld etc.). He also
undertook many expeditions to Namibia and Northern
Province, South Africa, often at his own expense, as well
as to Madagascar, Angola, Comoro Islands and Mauri-
tius. He established a small garden of Madagascan plants
at Nwanedi National Park in the former Venda homeland,
where he could cultivate some of the more cold-sensitive
species out of doors. Dave enjoyed the outdoors, and his
collecting trips were, in addition to their scientific con-
tent, a welcome escape from what he saw as office
drudgery. And so he blossomed; as he relaxed with
increasing distance from Pretoria, so the stories of past
adventures came out, and new ones happened. For exam-
ple, on an expedition of which I was privileged to be a
part, he broke the ice with a tale of how he and Brand van
Breda, then of Worcester Veld Reserve, went to the
Richtersveld in a Volkswagen Beetle long before anyone
thought of made roads in that area. They stopped to ask
directions of a passing goatherd one day, and then asked
if the old lady thought they would reach their destination
in that vehicle. The old goatherd squatted down, peered
under the car and replied ‘Nee menere, in hierdie motor
sal djulle ry soos ’n bokooi wat swaar in die melk is’,
roughly translated as ‘No, gentlemen, in this car you will
go like a nanny-goat heavily in milk’.
FIGURE 1. — David Spencer Hardy (1931-1998). Studio portrait made
by A. Romanowski in 1984
240
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 2. — Dave Hardy with one of
his favourite subjects of study,
an aloe. Photo: Fanie Venter
Field work was however not all humour. There were
plants to be studied, considered and collected, and when
one returned home there were papers to be prepared and
reports to be compiled. Often, the collections included
fragile flowering material for illustration and eventual
inclusion in The Flowering Plants of Africa. Many plates
published between about 1958 and Dave’s retirement in
1991 record that the original material was a Hardy col-
lection; a smaller number were written up by Dave him-
self, often with one of the Institute scientists as co-author.
Volume 48 of The Flowering Plants of Africa is dedicat-
ed to Dave with the words ‘His acute perception of the
individual cultural needs of plants and especially mem-
bers of the extremely rich succulent flora of southern
Africa and Madagascar is the underlying secret of his suc-
cess. He has given special attention to subjects suitable
for inclusion in these pages and has, on occasions, also
supplied the text’. Dave’s written output was prodigious,
especially when one considers that most of it was written
in his ‘spare’ time, apart from his horticultural duties.
Unfortunately, he was averse to recording his own activi-
ties, with the result that the attached list of 174 publica-
tions cannot be said with certainty to be complete. These
publications are supported not only by the living material
in the Pretoria National Botanical Garden and elsewhere
(a true gardener, Dave was always generous with cut-
tings, seeds and other propagules), but by over 7 000
herbarium specimens; the first set is housed in PRE, but
there are many duplicates in herbaria around the world.
His publications include two books on succulents
(Bomman & Hardy 1972; Hardy & Fabian 1992). Most
of the remainder are semi-popular, which reflects his
passion for popularising and publicising his beloved suc-
FIGURE 3. — Dave Hardy in the glass-
house for desert plants at the
National Botanical Garden,
Pretoria. In the foreground is a
member of the grape family,
Cyphostemma curorii from
Namibia.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
241
culents. This did not stop at the written word. Dave was
a popular and sought-after speaker at meetings of soci-
eties concerned with plants, and 18 of his talks were
included in the Department of Agriculture’s contribution
to the radio spectrum, Calling all Farmers. On several
occasions he presented survival courses to the South
African Defence Force.
After his retirement Dave concentrated on Mada-
gascar, a country he loved. In May-June 1993 he did
restoration work at Jardin Botanique et Zoologique de
Tananarive, and the next year he returned to survey
aquatic weeds in the Antananarivo area (Dorr 1997). He
also led several tour groups through the botanical glories
of the island, and was involved in a project to restore
populations of Aloe snzannae , Madagascar’s most spec-
tacular aloe.
He was a member of the South African Association of
Botanists, and was awarded their Certificate of Merit in
January 1991; this is the Association’s award in recogni-
tion of services to botany by those without a degree in
the subject. In the same year he was awarded the Fel-
lowship of the Cactus and Succulent Society of America
in recognition of his field exploration, descriptions of
new taxa (at least seven) and for his more popular publi-
cations (Mitich 1991). He also belonged to the Succulent
Society of South Africa (serving on the editorial board of
Aloe), the British Cactus and Succulent Society, the
California Rare Fruit Growers’ Association, the Mauri-
tian Cactus and Succulent Society, the Cycad Society of
South Africa and the Natal Succulent Society.
The first living creature to be named after Dave was a
blood-sucking fly, Raymondia hardyi, found on a bat
which he collected while still in his teens. He is com-
memorated in the names of several plants: Stultitia
hardyi Dyer, Stapelianthus hardyi Lavranos, Euphorbia
platyclada var. hardyi Rauh, Aloe hardyi Glen, Cypho-
stemma hardyi Retief and Strumaria hardyana D. & U.
Miiller-Doblies.
EXTRACT FROM DAVE’S DIARY
One can escape one’s enemies or evade the attention of friends,
but no-one can escape or evade themselves.
Man is the architect of his own fortune
Not all things came easily in my life but I took them,
planned them, because 1 wanted them.
My insatiable desire to explore the unknown;
adventure is my lifeblood — after all why fret about tomorrow
if today be sweet,
tomorrow I may be with yesterday’s 7000 years
My family, my friends, my deserts, my forests mean more
to me than millions of dollars.
Man sometimes forgives — but never forgets
nature never forgives and never forgets
God always forgives!
Thank you all for being my friends and being here today
Life has indeed been good to me
’1 did it my way’
REFERENCES
DORR, L.J. 1997. Plant collectors in Madagascar and the Comores.
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
GUNN, M.D. & CODD, L.E. 1981. Botanical exploration of southern
Africa. Balkema, Cape Town.
MITICH, L.W, 1991. Four selected fellows of CSSA. Cactus and
Succulent Journal (Los Angeles) 63: 177-179.
PUBLICATIONS BY D.S. HARDY
BORNMAN, H. & HARDY, D.S. 1970. Difficult grass aloes. Aloe 8,1: 8.
-1972. Aloes of the South African veld. Voortrekkerpers, Johannesburg.
-1982a. Review: Botanical exploration of southern Africa, by Mary Gunn
& L.E. Codd. Aloe 19: 90.
-1982b Review: The new Haworthia handbook, by M B Bayer. Aloe
19: 90, 91.
-1983a. Review: Stapeliarum in hortus vindoboniensis cultarum Nico-
laus LB A. Jacquin. Aloe 20: 9.
-1983b Review The Euphorbia journal vol. 1 Aloe 20: 87
-1983c Review: The Adenium and Pachypodium handbook, by Gor-
don D. Rowley. Aloe 20: 89.
-1984a Review: The cacti of the United States and Canada, by Lyman
Benson. Aloe 21: 75.
-1984b. Review: The Euphorbia journal vol. 2. Aloe 21: 75.
-1985a Review: The sex life of flowers, by Bastiaan Meeuse and Sean
Morris. Aloe 22: 18.
-1985b. Aloe vigueri. Aloe 22: 18, 19.
-1985c. She hitched her wagon to a daisy: a tribute to Cythna Letty.
Aloe 22: 30,31.
-1987. Review: Flowers of southern Africa, by Auriol Batten. Aloe 24:
10.
-1988 Review: The Euphorbia journal vol. 4 Aloe 25: 12.
DYER, R.A. & HARDY, D.S. 1966. Some unfamiliar southern African
succulent plants. Cactus and Succulent Journal (Los Angeles)
38: 64-69
-1968 The relationship of Echidnopsis columnaris, a new combina-
tion. Cactus and Succulent Journal (Los Angeles) 40: 206, 207.
—1969. Echidnopsis columnaris. The Flowering Plants of Africa 40: t.
1563.
-1970. Random remarks on the genus Hoodia. Cactus and Succulent
Journal (Los Angeles) 42: 179-181
-1982a. Trichocaulon delaetianum. The Flowering Plants of Africa 47:
t. 1845.
-1982b. Trichocaulon alstonii. The Flowering Plants of Africa 47: t.
1846.
242
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
GLEN, H.F. & HARDY, D.S. 1986a, A method for the non-destructive
examination of leaves of Aloe species by SEM. Bothalia 16:
53-55.
-1986b. Aloe schelpei. The Flowering Plants of Africa 49: t. 1935.
-1986c. Aloe thorncroftii. The Flowering Plants of Africa 49: t. 1936.
-1987a. Aloe marlothii subsp. orientalis. The Flowering Plants of
Africa 49: t. 1943.
-1987b. Aloe cooperi subsp. pulchra. The Flowering Plants of Africa
49: t. 1944.
-1987c. Rosa abyssinica. Thb Flowering Plants of Africa 49: t. 1945.
— 1 987d. Nomenclatura! notes on three southern African representatives
of the genus Aloe. South African Journal of Botany 53 : 489- 492.
-1988a. The identity of Aloe pendul [flora Bak. Kew Bulletin 43: 523-529.
-1988b. Aloe capitata var. capitata. The Flowering Plants of Africa 50:
t. 1973.
-1988c. Nepenthes madagascariensis. The Flowering Plants of Africa
50: t. 1974.
— 1988d. Dr L.E.W. Codd. Aloe 25: 22.
-1990a. Aloe gerstneri. The Flowering Plants of Africa 51: t. 2008.
-1990b. Aloe albida. The Flowering Plants of Africa 51: t. 2010.
-1990c. Aloe cameronii var. bondana. The Flowering Plants of Africa
51: t. 2011.
— 1 990d. Aloe dumetorum. The Flowering Plants of Africa 51: t. 2012.
-1990e. What colour is vinaceous? Nomenclatural Forum 25: 186.
-1990f (publ. 1991 ). Unusual fruit of nyala tree. Trees in South Africa
42: 22-27.
-1991. The type specimen of Aloe soutpansbergensis Verdoorn (Lilia-
ceae/Asphodelaceae). Bothalia 21: 151, 152.
-1992a. Aloe buchlohii. The Flowering Plants of Africa 52: t. 2047.
-1992b. Aloe laeta. The Flowering Plants of Africa 52: t. 2048.
-1993a. Aloe meyeri. The Flowering Plants of Africa 52: t. 2065.
-1993b. Aloe veseyi. The Flowering Plants of Africa 52: t. 2066.
-1992c (publ 1994). Baobabs: fathers ofthe forest. Trees in South Africa
43: 38-44.
-1995. Aloe section Anguialoe and the problem of Aloe spicata L.f.
(Aloaceae). Haseltonia 3: 92-103.
GLEN, H.F , HARDY, D.S. & CONDY, G.S. 1997. Aloe suzannae. Flow-
ering Plants of Africa 55: 8-12.
GLEN, H.F., HARDY, D.S. & LAVRANOS, JJ. 1992. Aloe guillau-
metii. The Flowering Plants of Africa 52: t. 2046.
GLEN, H.F., HARDY, D.S. & VERDOORN, I.C. 1990. Aloe harlana.
The Flowering Plants of Africa 5 1 : t. 2009.
GLEN, H.F., SMITH, G.F. & HARDY, D.S. 1995. Typitication of Aloe
species described by B.H. Groenewald (Asphodelaceae/Aloa-
ceae). Bothalia 25: 97-99.
HARDY, D.S. 1964a. The Richtersveld Aloe 2,1 17-19.
-1964b. The occurrence of ‘swart roes’ in the genus Aloe. Aloe 2,2: 3, 4.
-1964c. The aloes of Somalia. Aloe 2,2: 21.
-1965. The aloes of Namaqualand. Aloe 3,3: 4-7.
-1966a. The difference between cacti and aloes. Aloe 4,3: 13.
-1966b. Obituary: Bernard Carp Aloe 4,3: 16.
-1966c. Know your plants. Aloe 4,3: 17-19.
-1968a. The spiral aloe from the Maluti Mountains. Cactus and Suc-
culent Journal (Los Angeles) 40: 49-51.
-1968b. Notes on a new species of Haworthia from the central Trans-
vaal. Cactus and Succulent Journal (Los Angeles) 40: 92, 93.
-1968c. An interesting species of Aloe from the Natal midlands. Cactus
and Succulent Journal (Los Angeles) 40: 147, 148.
— 1 968d. An interesting Stultitia species from South Africa. Cactus and
Succulent Journal (Los Angeles) 40: 221, 228.
-1969a. Review: South African aloes, by Barbara Jeppe. Aloe 7,4: 9-1 1
-1969b Notes on some interesting South West African succulents.
Cactus and Succulent Journal (Los Angeles) 41: 3-5.
-1969c. Notes on Aloe soutpansbergensis, an interesting species from the
northern Transvaal. Cactus and Succulent Journal (Los Angeles)
41: 164, 165
-1970a. Madagascar. Aloe 8,2: 33, 34.
-1970b. Aloe pearsonii. The Flowering Plants of Africa 40: t. 1594.
-1971a. A new Aloe from South West Africa (Liliaceae). Bothalia 10:
366-368.
-1971b. A glimpse at the plant life of the Malagasy Republic, part 1.
Cactus and Succulent Journal (Los Angeles) 43: 125-127.
-1971c. Notes on a new species of Aloe from South West Africa.
Cactus and Succulent Journal (Los Angeles) 43: 218.
-197 Id. A glimpse at the plant life of the Malagasy Republic, part 2.
Cactus and Succulent Journal (Los Angeles) 43: 239-241.
-1972. Liliaceae: a new Aloe from South West Africa. Aloe 10,2: 22, 23.
-1973a. Succulents: know them and grow them. Aloe 11,3: 35-38.
-1973b. Recent developments. Aloe 11,3: 45.
-1973c. Review: Excelsa no. 2. Aloe 1 1,3: 49.
-1974a. The Comores, the islands ofthe moon. Aloe 12: 99, 100.
-1974b. Moringa. Aloe 12: 134.
-1974c. Addenda. In G.W. Reynolds, The Aloes of South Africa edn 3 .
Balkema, Cape Town.
-1975. Pachypodium geayi, an arborescent species from the Malagasy
Republic. Aloe 13: 89, 90.
-1976a. Review: Aloes of South West Africa, by J.W. Jankowitz. Aloe
14: 31.
-1976b. A new species of Aloe from the Humansdorp District (Lilia-
ceae). Bothalia 12: 62-64.
-1978. Some observations on the vegetation and climate ofthe Sonoran
Desert. Aloe 16: 3-6.
-1980. Robert Allen Dyer: the botanist and the man. Cactus and Suc-
culent Journal (Los Angeles) 52: 263.
-1983a. For the love of an island, part 1. Aloe 20: 16, 17.
-1983b. For the love of an island, part 2. Aloe 20: 42 — 45.
-1983c. For the love of an island, part 3. Aloe 20: 56-58.
-1983d. A preliminary list of succulent plants of Venda, their Venda
names and use. Aloe 20: 56-67.
— 1 983e. For the love of an island, part 4. Aloe 20: 82-85.
-1984a. For the love of an island, part 5. Aloe 21 : 19-21 .
-1984b. For the love of an island, part 6. Aloe 21: 30, 31.
-1984c. Muvhuyu — the baobab. Aloe 21: 43, 44.
— 1984d. For the love of an island, part 7. Aloe 21 : 54.
-1984e. Uncarina grandidieri. Aloe 21: 68, 69.
— 1 984f. Aloe thorncroftii , pride of Barberton. Aloe 21 : 72.
-1984g. Aloe divaricata. The Flowering Plants of Africa 48: t 1881.
— 1984h. Aloe vaombe. The Flowering Plants of Africa 48: t. 1882.
— 1 984i. Aloe viguieri. The Flowering Plants of Africa 48: t. 1883.
— 1 984J. Aloe antandroi. The Flowering Plants of Africa 48: t. 1884.
-1984k. Aloe erinacea. The Flowering Plants of Africa 48: t. 1885.
-1985a. For the love of an island, part 8. Aloe 22: 10, 11.
-1985b. The Namib, a living sea of sand, part 1. Aloe 22: 28, 29.
-1985c. For the love of an island, part 9. Aloe 22: 40^12.
-1985d. Review: Grasses of South West Africa, by M.A.N. Muller. Aloe
22: 44.
1 985e. Aloe vaombe. Aloe 22: 44, 45.
— 1 985f. Aloe divaricata. Aloe 22: 52.
1 985g. For the love of an island, part 10. Aloe 22: 65, 66.
-1985h. The Namib, a living sea of sand, part 2. Aloe 22: 67, 68.
— 1 985i. The Namib, a living sea of sand, part 3. Aloe 22: 78, 79.
-I985J. For the love of an island, part 11. Aloe 22: 84, 85.
-1985k. Aloe antandroi. Aloe 22: 88, 89.
-19851. Aloe cryptoflora. The Flowering Plants of Africa 48: t. 1901 .
-1985m. Aloe compressa var. schistophila. The Flowering Plants of Africa
48: t. 1902.
— 1 985n. All things bright and beautiful: a tribute to Cythna Letty.
Cactus and Succulent Journal (Los Angeles) 57: 243.
V
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
243
-1986a. For the love of an island, part 12. Aloe 23: 8-10.
-1986b. Inez Clare Verdoorn ( 1 896—). Aloe 23: 28, 29.
—1986c. Aloe pillansii. Aloe 23: 47.
-1986d. For the love of an island, part 13. Aloe 23: 50,51.
— 1 986e. Review: The genus Flaworthia. a taxonomic review, by Charles
L. Scott. Aloe 23: 52.
-1986f. The Namib, a living sea of sand, part 4. Aloe 23: 64, 65.
-1986g. Aloe lineata. Aloe 23: 71.
-1986h. For the love of an island, part 14. Aloe 23: 72, 73.
— 1986i. Edithcolea grandis var. baylissii , a lost Tanzanian stapeliad. Aloe
23: 76.
— 1986j. The Namib, a living sea of sand, part 5. Aloe 23: 77.
-1986k. Aloe helenae. The Flowering Plants of Africa 49: t. 1934.
-1987a. Aloe compressa. Aloe 24: 4.
-1987b. The Namib, a living sea of sand, part 5a. Aloe 24: 6, 7.
-1987c. For the love of an island, part 15. Aloe 24: 8, 9.
-1987d. The Namib, a living sea of sand, part 6. Aloe 24: 29, 30.
-1987e. Madagascar — the rescued ones. Aloe 24: 40, 41.
-1987f. Pachycereus pringlei. Aloe 24: 42.
— 1 987g. Robert Allan Dyer 1900-1987. Aloe 24: 44-46.
-1988a. Moringa — a ghost tree. Aloe 25: 8.
-1988b. Aloe cryptoflora. Aloe 25: 9.
-1988c. Pterodiscus aurantiacus: a case of mistaken identity. Aloe 25:
27, 28.
— 1988d. Stapelia clavicorona. Aloe 25: 36.
— 1 988e. Aloe haworthioides. The Flowering Plants of Africa 50: t. 1971.
-1989a. Notes on an interesting annual succulent from the northern
Transvaal. Aloe 26: 15.
—1989b. Stapelia remota. Aloe 26: 37.
-1989c. A note on utilisation of Aloe marlothii by kudu during drought.
Aloe 26: 55.
— 1 989d. Inez Clare Verdoorn. Aloe 26: 68.
-1989e. Pachypodium lamerei. Aloe 26: 69.
— 1 989f. Aloe conifera. The Flowering Plants of Africa 50: t. 1981.
-1990a. Review: Euphorbia journal vol. 6. Aloe 27: 5.
-1990b. Aloe haworthioides. Aloe 27: 6, 7.
-1990c. Review: Cycads of Africa, by Douglas Goode. Aloe 27: 13.
-1990d. Aloe fouriei. Aloe 27: 98.
—1991a. Succulents of southern Africa: A loe cryptopoda. Custos 19,11: 22.
—1991b. Succulents of southern Africa: Aloe aculeata. Custos 19,12: 39.
-1991c. Succulents of southern Africa: Orbeanthus hardyi. Custos 20, 1 : 22.
-199 Id. Succulents of southern Africa: Stapelia getliffei. Custos 20,2: 39.
— 1991e. Succulents of southern Africa: Cyphostemma spp. Custos 20,3: 27.
— 199117 Succulents of southern Africa: Aloe lutescens. Custos 20,5: 47.
— 1 99 1 g. Succulents of southern Africa: Euphorbia spp. Custos 20,7:
45-17.
—199 1 h. Succulents of southern Africa: ghastly’ plants thrown out.
Custos 20,8: 45-47.
— 1 99 1 i. Succulents of southern Africa: midday flowers. Custos 20,9: 18.
— 1 99 1 j . Aloe macroclada, an attractive species from Madagascar. Aloe
' 28: 72.
-1992a. Succulents of southern Africa: Adenia pechuelii. Custos 20,11:
46, 47.
-1992b. Succulents of southern Africa: Pterodiscus — the sesame seed
plant. Custos 20,12: 46, 47.
-1992c. Kaokoland, Africa's last wilderness. Aloe 29: 46-49.
HARDY, D.S. & FABIAN, A. 1 992. Succulents of the Transvaal. South-
ern Books, Halfway House.
HARDY, D.S. & GLEN, HR 1987. Aloe fouriei. The Flowering Plants
of Africa 49: t. 1941.
—1992. LJncarina decaryi. The Flowering Plants of Africa 52: t. 2056.
HARDY, D.S. & IMMELMAN, K.L. 1984. Uncarma stellulifera. The
Flowering Plants of Africa 48: t. 1899.
HARDY, D.S. & LA FON, R. 1982. The baobab: silent colossus of the
African bush. Cactus and Succulent Journal (Los Angeles) 54:
51-53.
HARDY, D.S. & REID, C. 1981 A new variety of Aloe from the Vry-
heid District. Bothalia 13: 451, 452.
HARDY, D.S. & RETIEF, E. 1981. The caudiciform Cyphostemma
species from southern Africa. Cactus and Succulent Journal (Los
Angeles) 53: 163-166.
HARDY, D.S. & VERDOORN, I.C. 1970. Aloe ballii. The Flowering
Plants of Africa 40: t 1589.
IMMELMAN, K.L. & HARDY, D.S. 1986. Cirrhopetalum umbellatum.
The Flowering Plants of Africa 49: t. 1940.
'MAHAFALY'. 1971a. Madagascar. Aloe 9,1 8-10.
-1971b. Madagascar (2). Aloe 9,2: 21-24.
-1971c. A long day in the bush. Aloe 9,3: 30, 31.
-1972. Graft that difficult succulent. Aloe 10,1: 11.
RETIEF, E. & HARDY, D.S. 1990. Quaqua mammillaris. The Flower-
ing Plants of Africa 51 : t. 2004.
SPIES, J.J. & HARDY, D.S. 1983. A karyotypic and anatomical study
of an unidentified liliaceous plant. Bothalia 14: 215-217.
VAN WYK, B E , WHITEHEAD, C.S., GLEN, H F., HARDY, D.S., VAN
JAARSVELD, E.J. & SMITH, G.F. 1993. Nectar sugar composi-
tion in the subfamily Alooideae (Asphodel aceae). Biochemical
Systematics and Evolution 21 : 249-253.
VERDOORN, I.C. & HARDY, D.S. 1965. Aloe prinslooi The Flower-
ing Plants of Africa 37: t. 1453.
-1967. Aloe inermis. The Flowering Plants of Africa 38: t. 1516.
-1970. Aloe viridiflora. The Flowering Plants of Africa 40: t. 1598.
H.F. GLEN*
* National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria.
BAREND PETRUS BARKHUIZEN (1921-1995):
AMATEUR BOTANIST, SUCCULENT PLANT SPECIALIST AND EDUCATOR
Three years ago the South African botanical commu-
nity lost one of its most active and knowledgeable ama-
teur succulent plant specialists with the passing of
Barend Petrus (Ben) Barkhuizen. Although he trained as
a teacher, from an early age he was interested in nature,
in particular the wonderfully diverse succulent plant
flora of the subcontinent. He was in many ways a pioneer
and produced a book (Barkhuizen 1978) on the succu-
lents of the subcontinent at a time when there was pre-
cious little literature available on this component of our
flora (Van der Schijff 1995). To this day this publication
is the only book on the subject which originally appeared
in Afrikaans.
Ben Barkhuizen was born on 6 August 1921 in the
North-West Province of South Africa, an area then gener-
ally known as the western Transvaal. With two brothers
and two sisters, Ben grew up on his farther’s cattle farm,
Schietkraal, near Amalia in the district of Schweizer
Reneke. In this arid and often drought-stricken bushveld
244
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 4. — Prof. Ben Barkhuizen
where he was happiest —
surrounded by part of his be-
loved potted succulent plant
collection. Undated photo-
graph taken at Kameeldrift,
north of Pretoria.
region, Ben became interested in succulents at the age of
15 and maintained a fascination with these plants for the
rest of his life. The ability of succulents to survive long
periods of drought and still more or less regularly produce
striking flowers particularly fascinated Ben. He complet-
ed the first eight years of his education at the farm school
Uitvalskop and thereafter attended the secondary school
at Schweizer Reneke for three years before transferring to
the Helpmekaar Hoerskool in Johannesburg where he
matriculated in 1939. It must have been a rather testing
move for the young Ben who had up to that time been
accustomed to the dry flatlands of a thinly populated rural
area. After matriculating in Johannesburg, he returned to
the western Transvaal and enrolled at the Potchefstroom
University College for a diploma in education. At the end
of 1942 he received the Transvaal Teachers Diploma and
immediately joined the ranks of the primary school teach-
ing community in which he remained for the next 26
years, until 1967. During this time Ben successively held
positions at the following schools: as a teacher at the
Werda Primary School in Springs (1943-1955), as vice-
principal at the same school (1955-1959), as deputy prin-
cipal at the Pierneef Primary School in Pretoria
(1960-1962), and finally as principal at Die Poort
Primary School, also in Pretoria, from 1963-1967.
Virtually throughout this period of teaching Ben
remained academically active and obtained all his degrees
by correspondence from the University of South Africa
(UNISA). As anyone who has ever done academic stud-
ies part time or by correspondence will testify, a special
dedication is required to achieve success. Ben displayed
this dedication and commitment and graduated with a
B.A. degree soon after he started his teaching career, a
B.Ed. in 1960, M.Ed. ( cum laude ) in 1962 and D.Ed. in
1968. Just before completing his doctorate, he accepted a
position as senior lecturer (1968-1972) at his alma mater,
UNISA, where he later became professor and head of the
Department of Empirical Education (1973-1979).
Ben, a large, burly man of over two metres tall, was
also a good sportsman and excelled at rugby, in which he
was awarded provincial colours for Eastern Transvaal. He
firmly believed that a healthy mind resides in a healthy
body. In later years this belief, coupled with his lifelong
interest in the education of the youth of our country, pos-
sibly prompted his accepting positions such as Chairman
of the Board that administered the funds of the Transvaal
Youth Trust (Barkhuizen 1995). The primary objective of
this organisation is to provide financial assistance to
underpriviledged scholars for participation in activities at
school and on regional, national and international levels.
During his early years as a teacher in Springs he met
a petite girl, Rita de Jager, who became his lifelong com-
panion on 5 April 1946. She shared his love for succu-
lents and, with their two sons, Johan and Lex, accompa-
nied him on numerous excursions through the arid land-
scapes of Namibia, the Karoo, the Northern Cape and the
western parts of the Free State in search of prized speci-
mens for his collection. Eventually, in 1959, when the
family moved from Strubenvale on the East Rand to a
smallholding, virtually on the banks of the Roodeplaat
Dam near Pretoria, his beloved succulents finally found
a home in the spacious back yard of the property (Figure
4). Here the collection was augmented, cared for, propa-
gated sexually and vegetatively, and studied. Observa-
tions made in this nursery formed the basis of many of
Ben’s talks to the local community and articles in popu-
lar family magazines on the care and cultivation of these
fascinating drought-surviving plants (Van der Schijff
1978). Numerous, illustrated articles on South African
succulents also appeared during the years 1964-1967 in
the modest, early editions of Aloe, the journal of the
South African Aloe and Succulent Society.
Prof. Barkhuizen was also an accomplished linguist.
He, amongst others, translated the Aloe book published
by Jcppe (1969) into Afrikaans. This necessitated the cre-
ation of a number of novel Afrikaans words, e.g. the use
of the words ‘gedronge stamme’ for the shortish stems
produced by the maculate aloes, such as A. mudenensis.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
245
After his retirement Ben continued his research in the
botanical field. By 1984 he was working on a book on
the succulents of the old Transvaal province of South
Africa (Coetzee 1984). However, Dave Hardy, horticul-
turist at the former Botanical Research Institute, had
embarked on a similar project (Hardy & Fabian 1992).
Ben eventually abandoned this idea and then concentrat-
ed his efforts on a book on the succulents of the Little
Karoo. It is not known what happened to what must have
been a partially completed manuscript.
His love of nature was not limited to succulents,
although these plants remained his first love throughout
his life. His general interest in nature and the indigenous
flora of southern Africa also found expression in garden
landscaping. He played a significant role in the develop-
ment of the gardens of UNISA and the gardens of the
Medical University of South Africa, both in Pretoria. His
involvement in the former resulted in the publication of
two books (Barkhuizen 1975, 1984). In both these works
his multidisciplinary and holistic approach to landscap-
ing is quite evident.
Ben Barkhuizen died unexpectedly of a heart attack
on 23 September 1995. He is survived by his wife, Rita,
younger son Lex, and six grandchildren. His collection
which had amassed to an alleged number of 20 000
plants, was purchased by succulent enthusiasts.
MARY ELIZABETH CONNELL (1917-1997)
‘Betty’ Connell was born in York, England, on 26th
March 1917 (Figures 5 & 6). Her initial education was at
York College for Girls. Even at this early stage she
showed evidence of considerable artistic talent — a talent
which was actively nurtured by her parents. While at
school she entered for the Royal College of Art Masters
examinations and obtained honours on two occasions: in
1932 for Drawing from Nature Forms and 1933 for
Pictorial Representation.
The Connell family emigrated to South Africa in
1933. After matriculating at Barnato Park in Berea, she
enrolled at the Johannesburg School of Art with the
intention of becoming an art teacher. During her second
year, in 1936, a post of botanical artist at the National
Herbarium in Pretoria under Dr Pole Evans became
vacant. She applied and was successful.
Her first work at the Herbarium involved the produc-
tion of large plates of poisonous plants and noxious
weeds which were published in Farming in South Africa.
At that time Cythna Letty, doyenne of South African
botanical artists, was the only other artist at the
Herbarium and under her tutelage Betty Connell began to
produce a series of plates for Flowering Plants of Africa.
In all, 121 of her plates were published in that work.
Among these plates was one she painted for me, namely
that of Cyrtanthus erubescens, a beautiful and very rare
new species from the Natal Drakensberg (Killick 1965).
A print of this plate, delicately executed and one of my
REFERENCES
BARKHUIZEN, B P. 1975. Die broodboomtuin van Unisa/The cycad
garden of Unisa. University of South Africa, Pretoria.
BARKHUIZEN, B P. 1978. Vetplante van suidelike Afrika met spesi-
fieke verwysing na die vetplantfamilies van die Republiek van
Suid-Afrika en Suidwes-Afrika. Perskor, Johannesburg. (Also
translated into English by Dr E. M. van Aardweg: Succulents
of southern Africa with special reference to the succulent fami-
lies of the Republic of South Africa and South West Africa.
Purnell, Cape Town).
BARKHUIZEN, B.P 1984. Borne, struike en voels van Unisarand/
trees, shrubs and birds of Unisarand. University of South
Africa, Pretoria. (For reviews see Unisa News-Nuus 1 1 ,4 and
1 1,7. The 16 full-colour illustrations of birds by Ingrid Bredell
were also sold as separate sets).
BARKHUIZEN, B.P. 1995. Die voorsitter van die Transvaalse
Jeugtrust se dankie / The chairman of the Transvaal Jouth Trust
says thank you). Northvaal Golf Tournament, Monument Golf
Club, 2 & 3 October 1995.
COETZEE. A 1984. A deep-rooted love of trees. Pretoria News, Thurs-
day, 14 June 1984.
HARDY, D. & FABIAN, A. 1992. Succulents of the Transvaal. South-
ern Book Publishers, Halfway House.
JEPPE, B 1969. South African aloes. Purnell, Cape Town.
VAN DER SCHIJFF, H P. 1978. Foreword. In B P Barkhuizen, Suc-
culents of southern Africa with special reference to the succu-
lent families of the Republic of South Africa and South West
Africa. Purnell, Cape Town.
VAN DER SCHIJFF, H P 1995. Ben Barkhuizen, die stille plantkundige.
Beeld, Friday, 1 December 1995: 6.
G.F. SMITH' and E M. A. STEYN'
'National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria.
favourite FPA plates (Figure 7), adorns my study wall at
home and is much admired by all.
FIGURE 5. — Mary Elizabeth Connell (1917-1997).
246
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 6. — Betty Connell working
on one of her paintings.
Apart from her contributions to Flowering Plants of
Africa , she contributed to important works such as,
White, Dyer & Sloane’s The succulent Euphorbieae
(southern Africa) (1941) and Meredith’s The grasses and
pastures of South Africa (1955) and Flora of southern
Africa. In addition to botanical drawings and paintings,
she undertook private work, mostly landscapes.
In 1942 she married Dr Niko Stutterheim, former
Vice-President of the Council for Scientific and In-
dustrial Research and chairman of the Witwatersrand
University Council, and raised a family of four sons and
one daughter.
She returned to the National Herbarium for two years,
1958-1960 and was responsible for 83 of the black and
white drawings of weeds in Henderson & Anderson’s
Common weeds in South Africa (1966), an updated and
enlarged version of Phillips’s Weeds of South Africa
(1939) to which she had also contributed. After 1960 she
did freelance work for the Herbarium.
We mourn the passing in July 1997 of an accomplished
artist, who contributed much to South African botany.
REFERENCES
HENDERSON, M. & ANDERSON, J.G. 1966. Common Weeds in
South Africa. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa
No. 37.
KILLICK, D.J.B. 1965. Cyrtanthus erubescens. The Flowering Plants
of Africa 37: t. 1442.
MEREDITH, D. 1955. The grasses and pastures of South Africa.
Trustees of the grasses and pastures book fund, Johannesburg.
PHILLIPS, E.P. 1939. Weeds of South Africa/Die onkruide van Suid-
Afrika. Government Printer, Pretoria.
WHITE, A., DYER, R.A. & SLOANE, B.L. 1941. The succulent
Euphorbieae (southern Africa). Abbey, Pasadena.
D.J.B. KILLICK*
* 465 Sappers Contour, Lynnwood, 0081 Pretoria.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
247
FIGURE 7. — Cyrtanthus erubescens Killick. Plate 1442 in The Flowering Plants of Africa 37 (1965).
Bothalia 28,2: 249-260 ( 1998)
National Botanical Institute South Africa:
administration and research staff 22 May 1998,
publications 1 April 1997-31 March 1998
Compiler: B.A. Momberg
CHIEF DIRECTORATE
CAPE TOWN
Huntley, Prof. B.J. M.Sc. Chief Director
Finca, Ms N.F. Administration Aid II
Stafford, Ms D.L. Senior Secretary
Tlali, P.N. Deputy Director. Labour Relations & Public Affairs
Woodward, Ms Y.J. Senior Administration Clerk II. Secretary
MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS SUBDIRECTORATE
CAPE TOWN
Jay, Dr J.A. Ph.D. (Chemistry), Dipl. (Marketing Management). Deputy Director
Malcolm, Mrs N.J. B.Journ.(Hons.). Senior Communications Officer. Media
Mulder, Mrs G.P Secretary/Typist II
Palmer, Ms G. B.A.(Ind. Psych.). Principal Communications Officer. Marketing
GRAPHIC SERVICES— CAPE TOWN
Davidson, D.C. B.A. (Hons.), PRISA Final Dipl. Principal Communications Officer
Loedolff, Mrs J. B.Sc.(Ind.Tech-). Senior Industrial Technician. Photographer/Illustrator
ADMINISTRATION DIRECTORATE
CAPE TOWN
Jordaan, A.W. Adv.Dip.B & A. Director: Personnel and Finance
Cornelissen, Mrs A.M. Secretary to the Board
Hughes, W.S.G. Head: Finance
Van Zyl, J.M. Head: Personnel
FINANCE— CAPE TOWN
Hughes, W.S.G. B.Com., C.A.(SA). Deputy Director
Armitage, Mrs C.S. Senior Accountant
Armitage, E.H. (contract worker)
Goodman, Mrs I.W. Senior Accounts Clerk II. Creditors
Jacobs, F.H. Accounts Clerk II
Madikane, M.S. Senior Accounts Clerk I
Manjo, C. Accounts Clerk II. Finance
Mirkin, Ms Y.A. Senior Secretary I
Neuwirth, Ms E.V. Senior Accountant. Salaries
Paulse, Mrs D.W.S. Senior Accounts Clerk I
Petersen, R.E. Senior Accounts Clerk III. Salaries
Roman, D.C. Assistant Internal Auditor. Cashier & publi-
cations
Traut, G.D. Senior Accountant. Financial Administration
Yeomen, Mrs I.N. Senior Accounts Clerk II. Creditors
250
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
PERSONNEL— CAPE TOWN
Van Zyl, J.M. M.Econ.(Ind.
Albu, Mrs K. Principal Typist I
Barnard, Mrs A. Training Officer
Crowie, A.C. Registry Clerk
Dollie, Mrs N.J. Administration Aid II
Engelbrecht, B. N.D.(Hort.), N.D.(PRM), Dip.(Forestry).
Senior Personnel Practitioner. Administration
Haupt, Mrs C.S. Administration Aid II. Guest house
Psych.). Assistant Director
Nicholas, Mrs W.L. Photocopy Machine Operator
Oelofse, Ms V.S. Principal Personnel Clerk. Recruitment
and Career planning
Onkruid, A. Courier II
Staal, PB. Senior Personnel Practitioner. Labour relations
Woodman, Ms L.R. Telephonist/Receptionist II
GARDENS DIRECTORATE
CAPE TOWN
Botha, D.J. D.Sc. Director: Gardens
Winter, J.H.S. N.D.(Hort.). Deputy Director: Gardens & Horticultural Services
Abrahams, A. Curator: Kirstenbosch NBG
Behr, Ms C.M. Curator: Harold Porter NBG
Britz, R.M. Curator: Free State NBG
Chaplin, P.J. Curator: Witwatersrand NBG
Heilgendorff, J.P. Curator: Pretoria NBG
Kluge, J.P. Curator: Lowveld NBG
Kriel, Mrs G.A. (Dip. Sec.) Senior Secretary II. Admin & Gardens
Oliver, I.B. Curator: Karoo NBG
Tarr, B.B. Curator: Natal NBG
PLANNING, MAINTENANCE & DEVELOPMENT— CAPE TOWN
Linde, D.C. N.T.C.III(Technician and Inspector of Works). M.S.A.I.D. Cert. Estate Agency.
Control Works Inspector
Arendse, D.S. Artisan’s Assistant II. Building maintenance
Kotze, D. Physical Planner
Manasse, S.P. Dip. (Masonry). Senior Artisan. Building maintenance
Peck, W.I. Artisan’s Assistant I. Building maintenance
HAROLD PORTER NBG— BETTY’S BAY
Behr, Ms C.M. B. Sc. (Hons.). Control Technician
Bezuidenhout, Mrs H.M. Senior Administration Clerk
Forrester, Ms J.A. N.T.C.III(Hort.). Chief Technician. Horticulture
KAROO NBG— WORCESTER
Oliver, I.B. N.D.(Hort.)(PRA). Control Technician
Ashworth, Mrs E.H. Senior Administration Clerk II
Jodamus, Ms N.L. Technician
Viljoen, D.M. N.D.(Hort.). Senior Technician. Collections
KIRSTENBOSCH NBG— CAPE TOWN
Abrahams, A. B. Sc. (Forestry & Nature Cons.), B.A.(Hon.)Business Management, M.BA.
Head: Agricultural Support Services
Goldschmidt, S.M. Assistant Director. Personnel Practitioner. Management
Le Roux, PH. N.D.(Hort.). Control Technician. Manager: Estate
Notten, Ms A.L. Senior Technician. Supervisor: Seed room
Powrie, Ms F.J. B. Sc. (Hons.), N.D.(Hort.). Control Technician. Manager: Nursery
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
251
Coerecius, Mrs R. Principal Typist I. Telephonist/Recep-
tionist
Crous, H.T. Senior Technician. Tissue culture
Duncan, G.D. N.D.(Hort.). Chief Technician. Bulbs
Engelbrecht, Mrs L.D. Senior Administration Clerk II.
Plant records
Fredericks, Ms N.C.E. Information Officer II
Geduldt. D.C. Specialized Auxiliary Services Officer II.
Plant records
Grace, T. Senior Storeman I
Hitchcock, A. N. N.H.D.(Hort.). Chief Technician. Sales
nursery
Jacobs, A.P. Information Officer
Jacobs, Ms J.C. Senior Administrative Assistant II. Secre-
tary
Jamieson, Mrs H.G. N.D. (Parks & Rec.). Chief Techni-
cian. Restio/Asparagus
Jaques, R.F. Senior Technician. New plant introductions
Lawrence, E. Technician. Proteas
Lewis, N.I. Security I. Engraver
Malan, Mrs C.E. B. Sc. (Hons.). Principal Communica-
tions Officer
Manuel, I.P Senior General Foreman. Seed room
Marent, Mrs H.C. Senior Administration Clerk. Plant
records
Mathys, Mrs S.S.B. Senior Accounts Clerk II. Gates
Mrubata, Ms P. Senior Technician. Outreach Officer
Picane, Ms S. Specialized Auxiliary Services Officer II.
Manager, Nursery
Prins, F.B. Security II
Rudolph, A. Security II
Smith, Mrs A. Typist I
Solomons, T.C. Senior General Foreman. Security
Szabo, Mrs B.J. Senior Technician. Annuals
Townsend, D.J. N.D.(Hort). Senior Technician. Garden &
nursery
Trautman, C.E. Artisan. Supervisor: Workshop
Van der Walt, Mrs L.E. N.D.(Hort.). Senior Technician.
Herbaceous collections
Van Jaarsveld, E.J. M.Sc., N.D.(Hort.). Chief Technician.
Succulents
Williams, G.C. Groundsman II. Gateman. Security
LOWVELD NBG — NELSPRUIT
Kluge, J.P. B. Sc. (Hons.), T.H.O.D. Control Technician
Froneman, W.C.F. N.D. (Nature Cons. & Man.), N.D. (Parks Ngqani, Mrs L.S. Administration Aid I
& Rec. Admin.), N.T.C.III(Hort.). Chief Technician Van der Walt, Mrs G.A. Senior Administration Clerk II
Hurter, P.J.H. B. Sc. (Hons.). Senior Scientific Officer.
Research
NATAL NBG— PIETERMARITZBURG
Tarr, B.B. N.D. (Parks & Rec. Admin.), Advanced Dip. (Adult Education). Control Technician
Gates, Mrs J.E. N.D. (Parks & Rec. Admin.), N.D.(Hort.)
Intermed.D. (Marketing Man.). Senior Technician.
Kniphofia, forest spp.
Nonjinge. S.H.B. Principal Scientific Officer
Roff, J. Education Officer
Van der Merwe, Mrs M.E.H. Senior Administration Clerk
II
Zuma, Mrs K.K. Administration Aid I
FREE STATE NBG— BLOEMFONTEIN
Britz, R.M. N.D. (Forestry). Control Technician
Eysele, Mrs J.P. Senior Administration Clerk II Raditlhare, Mrs E.M. Administration Aid II
Lumley. M.J. Chief Scientific Officer. Nursery Thaele, Mrs M.E. Administration Aid II
Mogale, A.O. Technician. Garden
PRETORIA NBG
Heilgendorff, J.P. H.N.D.(Hort-). Control Technician
Baloyi, K.J. Specialized Auxiliary Services Officer II
Baloyi, M.S. Dip. (IBM) Specialized Auxiliary Services
Officer II. Garden records
Chipi, S.M. Groundsman I. Security
Chuma, J.S. Groundsman I. Security
Dry, D.H. N.D.(Hort.). Chief Technician. Plant sales,
records and gate control. Technical papers on hor-
ticulture and plants
Ely, Ms D.D. Administration Clerk I
Eissell, Ms A. B.Sc.(Agric.). Technician. Production and
Sales nursery
Geza, N. Specialized Auxiliary Services Officer
Keyter, B.A. Senior Security Officer
Klapwijk, N.A. N.D.(Hort.), N.DJPlant Prod.), N.D. (Diesel
Fitting). Chief Technician. Planning and develop-
ment. Index Nursery, New Plant Company
252
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
Mabasa, J.R. Groundsman II. Security
Mahlase, M.M. Groundsman I. Security
Meyer, Mrs H. Senior Administration Clerk I
Swartz, Ms P.P. M.Sc. Senior Horticulturist. Scientific
and horticultural curation of living collections;
garden development; seedbank of endangered
plants and succulents; Madagascan plants
Venter, W.A. N.T.C.II. Senior General Foreman. Mainte-
nance
WITWATERSRAND NBG— WILROPARK
Chaplin, P.J. N.T.C.III(Hort.). Control Technician
Aubrey, Mrs A.E. N.Dipl.(Hort.) Plant sales, records,
succulents & herbs
Hankey, A.J. N.D.(Hort.). Principal Technician. Horti-
culture, garden, estate, collections
Head, Mrs S.E. Senior Administration Clerk II
Mmola, Mrs B.E. Administration Aid II. Cleaner
Moore, Mrs J.M. Administration Clerk I
Muller, Ms W. Administration Clerk
Ndzondo, Mrs G.P. Administration Aid I. Cleaner
Ndzondo, Ms N.L. Accounts Clerk I. Shop Assistant
Tebeile, Ms Z.M. Accounts Clerk I. Receptionist
Turner, Ms S.L. B. Sc. (Hons.), N.Dip.(Hort.) Senior Hor-
ticulturist, Nursery, Garden, Information
Vlok, Mrs S. B.Com. Administrative Assistant (contract).
Shop manager
RESEARCH DIRECTORATE
PRETORIA
Smith, Prof. G.F. Ph.D., F.L.S. Director: Research
Rutherford, M.C. Ph.D., Dip.(Datamet.). Deputy Director: Ecology and Conservation (Cape Town)
Wolfson, Mrs M.M. Ph.D. Deputy Director: Education and Research Support
Harris, Mrs S.R. Technician. Kew Liaison Officer Marais, Mrs A.C. Senior Administration Clerk II. Secre-
(contract worker) tary
Meyer, Mrs N.L. B. Sc. (Hons.) (contract worker) Steyn, Mrs E.M.A. Ph.D. Principal Scientist. Embryology
PLANT SYSTEMATICS SUBDIRECTORATE
PRETORIA
Smith, Prof. G.F. Ph.D., F.L.S. Systematics of succulents and rosulate, petaloid monocots
Arnold, T.H. Head: Data Management (Pretoria)
Koekemoer, Ms M. Curator: National Herbarium (Pretoria)
Leistner, O.A. D.Sc. F.L.S. Scientist (contract worker)
Rourke, Dr J.P. Curator: Compton Herbarium (Cape Town)
Williams, Ms R. Curator: Natal Herbarium (Durban)
Willis, C.K. M.Sc. (Cons. Biol.). Assistant Director. Project Co-ordinator: SABONET (Pretoria)
COMPTON HERBARIUM— CAPE TOWN
Rourke, J.P. Ph.D., F.L.S., F.R.S.S.Af. Assistant Director. Systematics of
southern African Proteaceae, Stilbaceae
Beyers, Mrs J.B.P. M.Sc. Scientist. Assistant Curator:
Collections. Taxonomy of the Gnidieae (Thyme-
laeaceae)
Chesselet, Ms P.C.M. M.Sc. Chief Scientific Officer
Cupido, C.N. B.Sc. Scientific Officer
Cupido, Mrs C.S. Specialized Auxiliary Services Officer.
Technical Assistant
Davidse, Mrs. E. Specialized Auxiliary Services Officer.-
Herbarium Assistant
Foster, Mrs S.E. Principal Typist I
Holm, K. Administration Aid II (contract worker)
Kurzweil, H. Ph.D. Specialist Scientist. Systematics of
southern African terrestrial orchids
Leith, Mrs J. Senior Administration Clerk II
Manning, J.C. Ph.D. Specialist Scientist. Systematics of
Iridaceae and Orchidaceae; anatomy
Marinus, Ms E.D.A. Principal Specialized Auxiliary Ser-
vices Officer. Herbarium Assistant
Oliver, E.G.H. M.Sc. Principal Scientist. Taxonomy of the
Ericoideae (Ericaceae)
Oliver, Mrs I.M. (contract worker)
Paterson-Jones, Mrs D.A. (nee Snijman) Ph.D. Principal
Scientist. Systematics of Amaryllidaceae; cladistics
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
253
Roux, J.P. N.T.C.III(Hort.), F.L.S., D.Sc. Principal Steiner, K.E. Ph.D. Specialist Scientist. Systematics of
Scientist. Systematics of Pteridophyta Scrophulariaceae and evolutionary interactions
between oil-secreting flowers and oil-collecting bees
NATAL HERBARIUM— DURBAN
Williams, Ms R. B. Sc. (Hons.), H.D.E. Chief Scientific Officer.
Crouch, N.R. Ph.D. Senior Scientist. Ethnobotanist
Hlongwane, Mrs C. Administration Aid II. Cleaner
Ngwenya, A.M. Principal Specialized Auxiliary Services
Officer. Herbarium Assistant. Plant identification,
plant information
Ngcobo, P.S. Specialized Auxiliary Services Officer II
Noble, Mrs H-E. Senior Administration Clerk II
Singh, Ms Y. B. Sc. (Hons.), H.E.D. Chief Scientific Officer.
Taxonomy of Zantedeschia , plant identifications
Tomalin, Mrs M. Data typist (contract worker)
NATIONAL HERBARIUM— PRETORIA
Koekemoer, Ms M. M.Sc. Assistant Director. Herbarium management. Taxonomy of Poaceae, Asteraceae:
Disparago, Stoebe, Amphiglossa, Elytropappus, Pterothrix and Bryomorphe
Bredenkamp, Mrs C.L. M.Sc. Principal Scientist. Assistant Curator: Public relations.
Taxonomy of Vitex, Phylica, Rhamnaceae, Sterculiaceae and other related families.
Herman, P.P.J. M.Sc. Principal Scientist. Assistant Curator: Personnel. Taxonomy of
Asteraceae, Flora of the northern provinces
Heymann, Mrs M.Z. T.E.Dip., B. A. (Education & History). Principal Specialized Auxiliary
Services Officer. Assistant Curator: Services, loans, gifts and exchanges
Anderson, H.M. Ph.D. Principal Scientist. Palaeobotany,
palaeogeography
Anderson. J.M. Ph.D. Specialist Scientist. Palaeobotany,
palaeogeography
Archer, R.H. Ph.D. Senior Scientist. Taxonomy of main-
ly Celastraceae, Euphorbiaceae
Archer, Mrs C. M.Sc. Senior Scientist. Taxonomy of
Cyperaceae, Restionaceae, Orchidaceae
Burgoyne, Ms P.M. M.Sc. Senior Scientific Officer.
Plant identifications co-ordinator
Cloete, Mrs M. Dip. (Typing). Senior Provisioning Clerk
II. Specimen label typist
Fish, Mrs L. B.Sc. Chief Scientific Officer. Taxonomy of
Poaceae. Plant collecting programme; supervising
mounters
Glen, H.F. Ph.D. Principal Scientist. Taxonomy of trees,
herbarium for cultivated plants, and botanical col-
lectors
Glen, Mrs R.P. M.Sc. Chief Scientific Officer. Taxonomy
of ferns, water plants
Jordaan, Mrs M. M.Sc. Chief Scientific Officer. Taxon-
omy of Casuarinaceae-Connaraceae, Maytenus
Kgaditsi, W.T. Specialized Auxiliary Services Officer II.
Mounter, general assistant in cultivated plants
section
Lephaka, G.M. Specialized Auxiliary Services Officer I.
Parcelling, pressing and general assistance
Makgakga, M.C. Senior Specialized Auxiliary Services
Officer. Herbarium assistant. Wing B
Makgakga, K.S. Specialized Auxiliary Services Officer
II. Mounter of vascular plants
Makwarela, A.M. B.Sc. Scientific Officer
Masombuka, Ms A.S. Specialized Auxiliary Services
Officer I. Herbarium assistant
Meyer, J.J. N.D. (Teaching). Scientific Officer. Herbarium
assistant, Wing C
Naicker, K. Sales & Marketing Management Certificate.
Senior Administration Clerk
Netnou. Ms N.C. B.Sc. Scientific Officer
Nkoana, L.S. Scientific Officer (contract worker)
Perold, Mrs S.M. Ph.D. Taxonomy of Ricciaceae, Hepati-
cae (contract worker)
Phahla, T.J. Specialized Auxiliary Services Officer I. Moun-
ter of bryophytes and vascular plants
Ready, Mrs J.A. N.D.(Hort.). Senior Specialized Auxiliary
Services Officer. Herbarium assistant. Wing D
Retief, Ms E. M.Sc. Senior Scientist. Pollen studies of
Boraginaceae. Taxonomy of Boraginaceae, Verben-
aceae, Lamiaceae, Asteraceae, Rubiaceae
Riddles, L.M.D. B.Sc. Scientific Officer
Schutte-Vlok, Mrs A.L. Ph.d. Scientist (contract worker)
Sebothoma, P.N. Specialized Auxiliary Services Officer I.
Herbarium assistant
Smithies, Mrs S.J. M.Sc., Dip. Ed. (Moray House). Chief
Scientific Officer. Taxonomy of Scrophulariaceae,
Selaginaceae, Lobeliaceae
Steyn, Ms C.C. Principal Auxiliary Services Officer. Anat-
omy, palynology
Van Rooy, J. M.Sc. Senior Scientist. Taxonomy and bio-
geography of mosses; supervising bryophyte moun-
ters
Victor, Ms J.E. M.Sc., H.Dip.Journ. Senior Scientific
Officer. Taxonomy of Rutaceae, Asclepiadaceae
Welman, Ms W.G. M.Sc. Senior Scientist. Taxonomy of
Convolvulaceae, Solanaceae, Cucurbitaceae,
Campanulaceae, Asteraceae, Acanthaceae
254
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
DATA MANAGEMENT— PRETORIA
Arnold, T.H. M.Sc. Assistant Director. Computer application especially in taxonomy
Botha, Mrs A.G. Principal Specialized Auxiliary Ser-
vices Officer. Secretary
De Wet, Mrs B.C. B. Sc. (Computer Science), B.A.,
H.D.L.S. Principal Datametrician
Harris, Mrs B.J. Specialized Auxiliary Services Officer.
Encoding, quality control
Hawker, Mrs L.C. Scientist (contract worker)
Henn, J. B. Com. (Informatics). Scientist
Mbedzi, M.D. Specialized Auxiliary Services Officer II
Prentice, Ms C. Scientist (contract worker)
Snyman, Mrs E.E. N.D.(Comp. Data Proc.) Scientific
Officer
Van Rooyen, Mrs V.H. Senior typist
SABONET— PRETORIA
Willis, C.K. M.Sc. (Cons. Biol.). Assistant Director. Project Co-ordinator
Haasbroek, Ms C.M. B.Com. Finances (contract worker)
Naude, Mrs H. Personal Assistant (temporary worker)
EDUCATION AND RESEARCH SUPPORT— PRETORIA
Wolfson, Mrs M.M. Ph.D. Deputy Director. Physiology/Ecophysiology of Poaceae, carbon uptake
metabolism, allocation in response to environmental and management stress
Clapperton, Mrs S. Typist II
Liebenberg, Mrs E.J.L. Head: Administration
Potgieter, Mrs. E. Senior Librarian
EDUCATION
GOLD FIELDS CENTRE— CAPE TOWN
Ashwell, Ms A.N. M.Ed. B.Sc. Assistant Director. Communication
Cupido, Ms M. Administrative Assistant I. Co-ordinator
Hitchcock, Mrs W.A. Principal Communications Officer. Adult education
Honig, Ms M. Communications Officer. Interpretation
Huet, Mrs H. Senior Administration Clerk
Mkefe, T.J. SPTD, Communications Officer
Tyhokolo, Ms S.E. SPTD, Communications Officer (contract worker)
FREE STATE
Masilo,T. Education Officer
PRETORIA
Wagiet, Dr R. B.Sc. (Hon. )Ed. Assistant Director. Communication
Symonds, Ms A.M. N.D. (Nature Cons.), H.D.E. Principal Communications Officer
Madlala, Ms N. N.T.C.III(HorL), N.D. (Parks & Rcc.Man.). Communications Officer
WITWATERSRAND
Van der Westhuizen, Mrs S. M.Sc. Principal Communications Officer
INTERPRETATION— PRETORIA
Joffe, Mrs H. B.Sc. Garden Utilization Officer
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
255
RESEARCH SUPPORT SERVICES AND PUBLICATIONS— PRETORIA
Du Plessis, Mrs H. M.Sc. Senior Scientist. Manager
Ben, A. Administration Clerk II. Bookstore
Brink, Mrs S.S. Dip. (Typing). Chief Typesetter. Typeset-
ting, layout, word processing
Condy, Ms G.S. M.A. Senior Industrial Technician. Bota-
nical artist
Du Plessis, Mrs E. B. Sc. (Hons.), S.E.D. Technical editor.
Editing, translating, layout
Germishuizen, G. M.Sc. Assistant Director. Editor
Mapheza. T.P. Administration Clerk II. Bookshop
Momberg, Mrs B.A. B.Sc.(Entomology & Zoology). Tech-
nical editor. Editing, layout
Maree, Ms D.J. Senior Typist
Romanoswki, Mrs A.J. Dip. (Photography). Senior Indus-
trial Technician (Photography). Scientific photo-
grapher
Turcke, Mrs S. B.A. (Information Design). Industrial
Technician. Graphic design
MARY GUNN LIBRARY— PRETORIA
Potgieter, Mrs E. B. Libr.. Senior Librarian
Fourie. Mrs A. B. Libr. Assistant Librarian (contract worker)
ADMINISTRATION— PRETORIA
Liebenberg, Mrs E.J.L. M.Sc. Chief Scientific Officer. Cytotaxonomy. Manager
Gotzel, Mrs A. Senior Telecom. Operator III
Kama, Mrs P.B. Administration Aid II
Khumalo, N.P. Principal General Foreman. Supervisor:
Office services
Koehne, Mrs R.W.R. Senior Registration Clerk
Makgobola, Mrs M.R. Administration Aid II
Malefo, R.P. Administration Aid I
Maphuta, Mrs M.S. Administration Aid II
Martin, Ms M.A. Senior Administration Clerk II
Nkosi, Mrs M.P. Administration Aid I
Phaahla, M.C. Administration Aid II
Smuts, Mrs W.E. Administration Officer. Personnel
Tloubatla, J.M. Courier/Photocopy Machine Operator
ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION SUBDIRECTORATE
CAPE TOWN
Rutherford, M.C. Ph.D., Dip.(Datamet-). Deputy Director. Climate change
Davis, G.W. Ph.D. Assistant Director. Head: Communi-
cation in research, ecology liaison. Stress and dis-
turbance ecology
Nanni. Ms I. B.Sc., H.D.E. Head: Research Support Ser-
vices
Reynolds, Ms P.Y. B.A.. H.D.L.S., B.Proc. Senior Librarian
Arendse, Ms A.E. Data capture (contract worker)
Bosenberg, J. de Wet B.Sc. (Hons.). Principal Scientific
Officer. Cycad biology and conservation
Botha, PA. N.H.D.(HorL). Chief Scientific Officer. Tissue
culture research, seed biology
Brown, N.A.C. Ph.D. Specialist Scientist. Seed biology
research, plant growth regulators
Charlton, Ms V.J. Secretary. Protea Atlas Project (con-
tract worker)
De Lange, J.H. B.Sc.(Hort-), M.Sc. (Plant Physiology),
D.Sc.(Agric.), Ph.D.(Bot.). Senior Specialist
Scientist. Ecology, tissue culture, horticulture
Donaldson, J.S. M.Sc. (Entomology), Ph.D. (Zoology).
Assistant Director. Cycad biology, plant/insect
interactions, conservation biology
Hilton-Taylor, C. B.Sc. (Hons. )(Biol. Sci.). Scientist.
Threatened plants, biodiversity of arid regions
Hoffman, M.T. Ph.D. Specialist Scientist. Disturbance
and historical ecology
Hunter, Ms D.A. Senior Administration Clerk II. Secretary
Jacobs, E.C. Specialized Auxiliary Services Officer II. La-
boratory Assistant. Cycl op iWHoney bush tea project
Joubert, E.L. Scientist. Information Technology Support
Officer
Lambey, Ms S. Student (contract worker)
Massyn, I.F. Scientific Officer. Protea Atlas Project Co-
ordinator (contract worker)
McDonald, D.J. Ph.D. Principal Scientist. Mountain vege-
tation, biogeography, conservation
Midgley, G.F. D.Sc. Principal Scientist. Plant stress phy-
siology/ecology. Climate change
Musil, C.F. Ph.D. Specialist Scientist. Plant stress phy-
siology/ecology. Climate change
O'Callaghan, M.G. Ph.D. Principal Scientist. Plant cli-
mate interactions
Petersen, Ms A. M.Sc. Senior Scientific Officer. Dis-
turbance and historical ecology (contract worker)
Pieper-Howeling, Ms H. Technician. GIS Operator
(contract worker)
Powrie, L.W. M.Sc. Chief Scientific Officer. Ecological
databases: computer co-ordination
Prosch, Ms D.S. (contract worker)
Rebelo, A.G. Ph.D. (Zoology). Principal Scientist. Conser-
vation biology, biogeography
256
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
Roberts, R.D. Climate change (contract worker) Wand, Ms S.J.E. M.Sc.(Agric.). Senior Scientist. Plant
Solomon, Ms A.M. M.Sc. Student (contract worker) stress physiology/ecology. Climate change
Todd, S.W. Scientist (contract worker)
RESEARCH SUPPORT SERVICES— CAPE TOWN
Nanni, Ms I. B.Sc., H.D.E. Chief Scientific Officer. Manager
Arnolds, Ms J.L. Specialized Auxiliary Services Officer.
Laboratory Assistant. Climate change
Bowler, Mrs M. Laboratory & Office Aid II
De Witt, D.M. Principal Specialized Auxiliary Services
Officer. Scientific Assistant
Jagger, B.W. Principal Specialized Auxiliary Services
Officer. Scientific Assistant
Madikane, Ms B.R. Specialized Auxiliary Services Offi-
cer II. Communication Assistant
Parenzee, Ms H.A. Dip. Ed. Senior Administration
Clerk II
Snyders, S.G. Specialized Auxiliary Services Officer I.
General Assistant. Climate change
HARRY MOLTENO LIBRARY— CAPE TOWN
Reynolds, Ms P.Y. B.A., H.D.L.S., B.Proc., B. Bibl.(Hons.). Principal Librarian
Majal, S. Student (contract worker)
PUBLICATIONS BY THE STAFF
1 April 1997-31 March 1998
ANDERSON, H.M. & ANDERSON, J.M. 1997. Why not look for
proangiosperms in the Molteno Formation? In G.F.W.
Hergreen, Proceedings of the 4th European Palaeobotanical and
Palynological Conference: 73—80. Mededelingen Nederlands
Instituut voor Toegepaste Geowetenschappen TNO 58.
ARCHER, C. 1997 Burmanniaceae, Cannaceae, Cyperaceae, Flagel-
lariaceae, Musaceae, Restionaceae, Strelitziaceae, Zingibe-
raceae. In N.L. Meyer, M. Mossmer, & G.F. Smith, Taxonomic
literature of southern African plants. Strelitz.ia 5: 123, 128, 133,
144, 145.
ARCHER, C. 1998. Grasses and ‘grass-like’ plants. PlantLife 18: 14—16.
ARCHER, C. & BALKWILL, K.B. 1997. The genus Carex L. (Cy-
peraceae) in southern Africa. 1. A new species of subgenus
Primocarex Kiik. from Northern Cape, with notes on the sub-
genus. South African Journal of Botany 63: 342—344.
ARCHER, C„ BROWNING, J & GORDON-GRAY, K.D. 1997.
Studies in Cyperaceae in southern Africa 3 1 : a third species of
Cyathocoma , C. bachmannii. South African Journal of Botany
63: 167-171
ARCHER, R.H. 1997a. Achariaceae, Ancardiaceae, Aquifoliaceae,
Balanitaceae, Balsaminaceae, Burseraceae, Buxaceae, Calli-
trichaceae, Dichapetalaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Greyiaceae,
Icacinaceae, Kirkiaceae, Malpighiaceae, Meliaceae, Melian-
Ihaceae, Ochnaceae, Oliniaceae, Passifloraceae, Ptaeroxyl-
aceae, Rhynchocalycaceae, Sapindaceae, Dioscoreaceae,
Haemodoraceae, Lanariaceae, Tecophilaeaceae, Velloziaceae.
In N.L Meyer, M. Mossmer & G.F. Smith, Taxonomic litera-
ture of southern African plants. Strelitz.ia 5: 40, 42, 47, 60, 63,
64, 70, 72-74, 82, 83, 86, 88, 98, 99, 104, 106, 111, 127, 128,
132, 145.
ARCHER, R.H. 1997b. Crinum acaule, C. minimum and C. parvibul-
bosum. Herbertia 52: 90—94.
ARCHER, R.H 1997c. Obituary: Leslie Charles Leach (1906—1996).
Bothalia 27: 91-96.
ARCHER, R.H. & CONDY, G 1997a. Cassine peragua. Flowering
Plants of Africa 55: 70-74, t. 2133.
ARCHER, R.H. & CONDY, G. 1997b Melianthus pectinatus subsp.
gariepinus. Flowering Plants of Africa 55: 82—85, t. 2135.
ARCHER, R.H., CRAIB, C & CONDY, G. 1997 Nerine platypetala.
Flowering Plants of Africa 55: 36—39, t. 2127.
ARCHER, R.H. & JORDAAN, M. 1997. Celastraceae In N.L. Meyer,
M. Mossmer, & G.F. Smith, Taxonomic literature of southern
African plants. Strelitz.ia 5: 66, 67.
ARCHER, R.H. & VAN WYK, A.E. 1997a. A taxonomic revision of
Robsonodendron , a new genus in the Cassinoideae (Ce-
lastraceae). South African Journal of Botany 63: 1 16—122.
ARCHER, R.H. & VAN WYK, A.E. 1997b. A taxonomic revision of
Cassine L. s.str. (Cassinoideae: Celastraceae). South African
Journal of Botany 63: 146—157.
ARCHER, R.H. & VAN WYK, A.E. 1997c. A taxonomic revision of
Lauridia Eckl. & Zeyh. (Cassinoideae: Celastraceae). South
African Journal of Botany 63: 227—232.
ARCHER, R.H, VAN WYK, AT. & CONDY, G. 1997. Mystroxylon
aethiopicum subsp. schlechteri. Flowering Plants of Africa 55:
76-80, t. 2134.
ARNOLD, T.H. 1997. Getting to know PRECIS: questions and an-
swers. PlantLife 17: 22.
ASHWELL, A. & BOBO-MRUBATA, P 1998. The Kirstenbosch Out-
reach Greening Programme: principles and practice.
Proceedings of the International Conference on Productive
Open Space Management, Technikon, Pretoria, 3—5 March
1998.
BAYER, M B., EGGLI, U„ VAN JAARSVELD, E.J., SMITH, G.F. &
SUPTHUT, D.J. 1997. Von Adrian Haworth zu Haworthia.
Haworthia und verwandte siidafrikanische Sukkulenten
Mitteilungen aus der Stadtischen Sukkulenten-Sammlung
Zurich 58: 1-24.
BEYERS, J.B.P 1997. New combinations in Lachnaea (Thymelae-
aceae). Bothalia 27: 45.
BEYERS, J.B.P. & BREDENKAMP, C.L. 1997. Thymelaeaceae. In
N.L. Meyer, M. Mossmer, & G.F. Smith, Taxonomic literature
of southern African plants. Strelitzia 5: 1 16, 1 17.
BEYERS, J.B.P. & VAN WYK, A.E. 1998. A new species of Lachnaea
(Thymelaeaceae) from the Western Cape. South African
Journal of Botany 64: 66—69.
BOTHA, C.J., GAUS, T.A., PENRITH, M„ NAUDE, T.W., LABU-
SCHAGNE, L. & RETIEF, E. Vermeersiekte caused by
Geigeria burkei Harv. subsp. burkei var. hirtella Mersun. in the
Northern Province of South Africa. Journal of South African
Veterinary Association 68: 97—101.
BOTHA, C.J., KELLERMAN, T.S., SCHULTZ, R.A., ERASMUS,
G.L., VLEGGAAR, R. & RETIEF, E. 1998. 'Krimpsiekte’ in a
sheep following a single dose of Tylecodon ventricosus
( Burnt. f.) Toelken and the isolation of tyledoside D from this
plant species. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research
65: 17-23.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
257
BREDENKAMP, C.L. 1997a. Araliaceae, Begoniaceae, Bombacaceae,
Canellaceae, Clusiaceae, Combretaceae, Dipterocarpaceae,
Ebenaceae, Elatinaceae, Erythroxylaceae, Flacourtiaceae,
Frankeniaceae, Gentianaceae, Gunneraceae, Haloragaceae,
Lecythidaceae, Linaceae, Loasaceae, Lythraceae, Malvaceae,
Melastomataceae, Onagraceae, Periplocaceae, Polygalaceae,
Punicaceae, Rhamnaceae, Rhizophoraceae, Sterculiaceae,
Tamaricaceae, Tiliaceae, Trapaceae, Turneraceae, Violaceae. In
N.L. Meyer, M. Mossmer, & G.F. Smith, Taxonomic literature
of southern African plants. Strelitzia 5: 47, 60, 64, 68, 70—72,
80-82, 85-87, 99, 100, 102, 104, 105, 116, 117, 119.
BREDENKAMP, C.L. 1997b. Periplocaceae. In G.F. Smith, E.J. van
Jaarsveld, T.H. Arnold. F.E. Steffens, R.D. Dixon & J.A. Retief,
List of southern African succulent plants'. 136, 137. Umdaus
Press, Pretoria.
BROWN, N.A.C., PROSCH, D.S. & BOTHA, PA. 1998. Plant-
derived smoke: an effective pre-treatment for seeds of
Syncarpha and Rhodocoma and potentially for many other fyn-
bos species. South African Journal of Botany 64: 90—92.
BROWN, N.A.C. & VAN STADEN, J. 1997. Smoke as a germination
cue: a review. Plant Growth Regulation 22: 115—124.
BUHRMANN, A., BROWN, N.A.C. & BOTHA, PA. 1998. Keimung
durch Rauch. Deutscher Gartenbau 3: 22—24.
BURGOYNE, P.M. 1997. Dioscoreaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Salva-
doraceae. In G.F. Smith, E.J. van Jaarsveld, T.H. Arnold, F.E.
Steffens, R.D. Dixon & J.A Retief, List of southern African
succulent plants : 66, 67, 71—75, 150, 151. Umdaus Press,
Pretoria.
CHESSELET, P. & DE WET, B.C. 1997. Mesembryanthemaceae In
G.F. Smith, E.J. van Jaarsveld, T.H. Arnold, F.E. Steffens, R.D.
Dixon & J.A. Retief, List of southern African succulent plants:
89—122. Umdaus Press, Pretoria.
CONDY, G. 1997a. 46 Drawings of Musci (Erpodiaceae— Hooken-
aceae). In Flora of southern Africa 1,3. National Botanical
Institute, Pretoria.
CONDY, G. 1997b. Drawing on cover and 30 line drawings. In G.F.
Smith, E.J. van Jaarsveld, T.H. Arnold, F.E. Steffens, R.D.
Dixon & J.A. Retief, List of southern African succulent plants.
Umdaus Press, Pretoria.
COWLING, R.M. & HILTON-TAYLOR, C. 1997. Phytogeography,
flora and endemism. In R.M. Cowling, D M. Richardson &
S.M. Pierce, Vegetation of southern Africa: 43—61. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge.
COWLING, R.M., RICHARDSON, D M. HOFFMAN, M.T. &
HILTON-TAYLOR, C. 1997. Diversity. In R.M. Cowling, D M.
Richardson & S.M. Pierce, Vegetation of southern Africa.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
COWLING, R.M., RICHARDSON, D M., SCHULZE, R E. , HOFF-
MAN, M.T., MIDGLEY, J.J. & HILTON-TAYLOR, C. 1997.
Species diversity at the regional scale. In R.M. Cowling, D.M.
Richardson & S.M. Pierce, Vegetation of southern Africa: 447—
473. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
CRAIB, C.L. & CONDY, G. 1997. Aloe modesta. Flowering Plants of
Africa 55: 2-7, t. 2121.
CROUCH, N. & ARNOLD, T.H. 1997. The National medicinal plants
database for South Africa (Medbase). PlantLife 17: 24.
CROUCH, N.R., BREDENKAMP, C.L. & NGWENYA, M.A. 1997.
Apocynaceae. In N.L. Meyer, M. Mossmer & G.F. Smith, Tax-
onomic literature of southern African plants. Strelitzia 5: 46, 47.
CROUCH, N„ SMITH, G.F. & MYEZA, N. 1997. Aloe pruinosa: a
rare spotted-leaf aloe from the KwaZulu-Natal midlands.
PlantLife 17: 30, 31.
CROUCH, N„ SYMMONDS, R„ NICHOLS, G. & CROUCH, T.
1998. Propagation techniques and cultivation ideas for Mondia
whitei (Periplocaceae) a Zulu muthi of distinction. PlantLife 18:
26, 27.
DAVIS, G. 1998. Landscapes and biodiversity in Mediterranean-type
ecosystems: the role of changing fire regimes. In J.M. Moreno,
Large forest fires: 109—131. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The
Netherlands.
DE LANGE, J.H. 1997a. Heuningbostee. Pamphlet, 19 May 1997.
DE LANGE, J.H. 1997b. Kweking van Heuningbostee. Pamphlet, 14
August 1997.
DE LANGE, J.H. 1997c. Addition to Kweking van Heuningbos.
Pamphlet, 14 October 1997.
DONALDSON, J.S. 1997. Is there a floral parasite mutualism in cycad
pollination? The pollination biology of Encephalartos villosus
Lemaire. American Journal of Botany 84: 1398—1406.
DREYER, L L. 1997a. Crassulaceae, Geraniaceae, Oxalidaceae,
Ranunculaceae. In N.L. Meyer, M. Mossmer, & G.F. Smith,
Taxonomic literature of southern African plants. Strelitzia 5: 69,
81, 99, 104.
DREYER, L L. 1997b. Brassicaceae, Crassulaceae, Geraniaceae, Oxa-
lidaceae. In G.F. Smith, E.J. van Jaarsveld, T.H. Arnold, F.E.
Steffens, R.D. Dixon & J.A. Retief, List of southern African suc-
culent plants: 46, 56—63, 78—80, 131. Umdaus Press, Pretoria.
DREYER, L.L. & GLEN, R.P 1997. Nymphaeaceae. In N.L Meyer,
M. Mossmer, & G.F. Smith, Taxonomic literature of southern
African plants. Strelitzia 5: 98.
DREYER, L.L., LEISTNER, O.A., BURGOYNE, P. & SMITH, G.F
1997. Sarcocaulon: genus or section of Monsonia (Gerani-
aceae)? South African Journal of Botany 63: 240.
DUNCAN, G.D. 1997a. Five new species of Lachenalia (Hya-
cinthaceae) from arid areas of South Africa. Bothalia 27: 7— 15.
DUNCAN, G.D. 1997b. Moraeas of the Western Cape. Veld & Flora
83: 42—44.
DUNCAN, G.D. 1997c. The rare and endangered moraeas of the
Western Cape Province, South Africa. Acta Horticulturae 430:
779-782.
DUNCAN, G.D. & ANDERSON, F. 1997. Lachenalia rosea. Flower-
ing Plants of Africa 55: 30—34, t. 2126.
FABIAN, A. & GERMISHUIZEN, G. 1997. Wild flowers of northern
South Africa. Femwood Press, Vlaeberg.
FISH, L. 1997a. Commelinaceae, Poaceae. In N.L. Meyer, M. Moss-
mer, & G.F. Smith, Taxonomic literature of southern African
plants. Strelitzia 5: 124, 135—144.
FISH, L 1997b. Commelinaceae, Poaceae. In G.F. Smith, E.J. van
Jaarsveld, T.H. Arnold, F.E. Steffens, R.D. Dixon & J.A. Retief,
List of southern African succulent plants: 53. 142, 143. Umdaus
Press, Pretoria.
GERMISHUIZEN, G. 1997a. Begoniaceae, Fabaceae, Loranthaceae,
Polygonaceae, Viscaceae. In G.F. Smith, E.J. van Jaarsveld,
T.H. Arnold, F.E. Steffens, R.D. Dixon & J.A. Retief, List of
southern African succulent plants: 43, 44, 76, 77. 86, 87, 144,
158, 159.
GERMISHUIZEN, G. 1997b. Fabaceae, Loranthaceae, Polygonaceae,
Viscaceae. In N.L. Meyer, M. Mossmer & G.F. Smith, Taxon-
omic literature of southern African Plants. Strelitzia 5: 74—80,
86, 102, 119.
GERMISHUIZEN, G. 1997c. New records of flowering plants for
Swaziland Bothalia 27: 144—146.
GERMISHUIZEN, G. 1997d Revision of the computerized numbering
system for African plants. Bothalia 27: 146, 147.
GERMISHUIZEN, G. & CONDY, G. 1997. Indigofera nigromontana.
Flowering Plants of Africa 55: 60—63, t. 2131.
GLEN, H.F. 1997a. Gymnospermae, Cactaceae. In N.L. Meyer, M. Moss-
mer & G.F Smith, Taxonomic literature of southern African
plants. Strelitzia 5: 37, 63, 64.
GLEN, H.F 1997b. The Paper Chase. SABONET News 2: 35, 36.
GLEN, H.F. 1997c. Timber in the VOC colony at the Cape. Trees in
South Africa 46: 11.
GLEN, H.F. 1997d. A description of the vegetation of Onbi Gorge
Nature Reserve, Natal, part 1. Trees in South Africa 46: 18—27.
GLEN, H.F. 1997e. More thoughts on local timber. Trees in South
Africa 46: 33—35.
GLEN, H.F 1997f. A description of the vegetation of Oribi Gorge
Nature Reserve, Natal, part 2: preliminary checklist of the flora
of Oribi Gorge. Trees in South Africa 46: 36—43.
GLEN H.F. 1997g. Notes towards a southern African Garden Flora 2:
Aceraceae. Trees in South Africa 46: 46—61.
GLEN, H.F 1997h. Design for a xylotheque. SABONET News 2: 55-60.
GLEN, H.F. 1997i Bombacaceae, Cactaceae, Sterculiaceae, Welwitschi-
aceae. In G.F. Smith, E.J. van Jaarsveld, T.H. Arnold, F.E.
Steffens, R.D. Dixon & J.A. Retief, List of southern African
succulent plants: 45, 49, 50, 154, 155, 162, 163. Umdaus Press,
Pretoria.
GLEN, H.F. 1997j. Obituary: John Denzil Carr. SABONET News 2:
112, 113.
GLEN, H.F. 1997k. The Paper Chase. SABONET News 2: 114-118.
GLEN, H.F., COETZEE, J.A. & BOTHA, A.J. 1997. C.H. Wehde-
mann’s pigments: bought or home-made? Proceedings of the
Microscopy Society of southern Africa 27: 74.
GLEN, H.F., HARDY, D.S. & CONDY, G.S. 1997. Aloe suzannae.
Flowering Plants of Africa 55: 8—12, t. 2122.
GLEN, H.F., MEYER, N.L., VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. & SMITH, G.F.
1997. Aloaceae. In G.F. Smith, E.J. van Jaarsveld, T.H. Arnold,
F.E. Steffens, R.D. Dixon & J.A. Retief, List of southern
African succulent plants: 6—1 1. Umdaus Press, Pretoria.
GLEN, H.F & NICHOLAS, A. 1997. The Paper Chase. SABONET
News!: 71-73.
258
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
GLEN, R P 1997a, Aquatic plants: are they friends or foes? South
African Wetlands 7: 4, 5.
GLEN, R P. 1997b. Azollaceae, Alismataceae, Aponogetonaceae,
Eriocaulaceae, Hydrocharitaceae, Juncaceae, Juncaginaceae,
Lemnaceae, Limnocharitaceae, Najadaceae, Pontederiaceae,
Potamogetonaceae, Ruppiaceae, Typhaceae, Xyridaceae, Zan-
nichelliaceae, Zosteraceae. In N.L. Meyer, M. Mossmer, & G.F.
Smith, Taxonomic literature of southern African plants.
Strelitzia 5: 31, 121, 122, 127, 130. 132, 133, 144-146.
GLEN, R.P 1997c. Pressing and drying of aquatic plants. PlantLife 17:
34.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 1997. New species of Aristea
(Iridaceae) from South Africa and notes on the taxonomy and
pollination biology of section Aristea. Novon 7: 137—144.
GOLDBLATT, P, MANNING, J.C. & ANDERSON, F. 1997. Homeria
hantamensis. Flowering Plants of Africa 55: 40—46, t. 2128.
HANKEY, A. 1997a. Indigenous plants and frost. Random Harvest
Nursery, Honeydew.
HANKEY, A. 1997b. Witwatersrand wild flower walk — another dis-
play of fireproof plants. PlantLife 17: 23.
HARTZER, P. 1997. Mesembryanthemaceae. In N.L. Meyer, M. Moss-
mer & G.F. Smith, Taxonomic literature of southern African
plants. Strelitzia 5: 89—95.
HERMAN, P.P.J & CONDY, G. 1997. Olea europaea subsp. africana.
Flowering Plants of Africa 55: 92—95, t. 2137.
HERMAN, PP.J., RETIEF, E. & WELMAN, W.G. 1997. Asteraceae.
In G.F. Smith, E.J. van Jaarsveld, T.H. Arnold, F.E. Steffens,
R. D. Dixon & J.A. Retief, List of southern African succulent
plants'. 37—40. Umdaus Press, Pretoria.
HERMAN, P.P.J , WELMAN, W.G., RETIEF, E. & KOEKEMOER, M.
1997. Asteraceae. In N.L. Meyer, M. Mossmer & G.F. Smith,
Taxonomic literature of southern African plants. Strelitzia 5:
50- 60.
HIGGINS, S.I., TURPIE, J.K., COSTANZA, R„ COWLING, R.M.,
LE MAITRE, D„ MARAIS, C. & MIDGLEY, G.F. 1997. An
ecological economic simulation model of mountain fynbos
ecosystems: dynamics, valuation and management. Ecological
Economics 22: 155—169.
HILTON-TAYLOR, C. 1997a. CITES COP-10. SABONET News 2:
51- 53.
HILTON-TAYLOR, C. 1997b. Farmers try to exterminate poisonous
succulents. To the Point — Newsletter of the Cactus and
Succulent Society of America, Supplement to the Cactus and
Succulent Journal (US) 69: 81.
HILTON-TAYLOR. C. 1997c. Red Data List of southern African
plants. 2. Corrections and additions. Bothalia 27: 195—209.
HILTON-TAYLOR, C. 1997d. Southern Africa. In S. Oldfield, Cactus
and succulent plants — status sun’ey and conservation action
plan: 67—85. IUCN/SSC Cactus and Succulent Specialist
Group, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
HILTON-TAYLOR, C. 1997e. Action proposals: southern Africa. In S.
Oldfield, Cactus and succulent plants — status survey and con-
servation action plan: 132—135. IUCN/SSC Cactus and
Succulent Specialist Group, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and
Cambridge, UK.
HILTON-TAYLOR, C. 1997f. Threatened succulents recorded for the
Flora of southern Africa (FSA) region. In S. Oldfield, Cactus
and succulent plants — status survey and conservation action
plan: 179—184. IUCN/SSC Cactus and Succulent Specialist
Group, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
HILTON-TAYLOR, C. 1997g. Threatened succulents of Zimbabwe. In
S. Oldfield, Cactus and succulent plants — status survey and
conservation action plan: 185. IUCN/SSC Cactus and
Succulent Specialist Group, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and
Cambridge, UK.
HILTON-TAYLOR, C. 1998h. Saga of Gibbaeum esterhuyseniae:
extinct, rediscovered and soon to be extinct again? Endangered
Wildlife 28: 30.
HOFFMAN, M T 1997. Human impacts on vegetation. In R.M.
Cowling, D.M Richardson & S.M Pierce, Vegetation of south-
ern Africa: 507—534. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
HUNTLEY, B J 1998. Foreword. In K.S. Walter* H.J. Gillett, 1997
IUCN Red List of threatened plants. IUCN — The World
Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
HURTER, P.J.H., GLEN, H F. & CLAASSEN M l 1997. Focus on ...
Encephalartos hirsutus Hurter. Encephalartos 52: 4—7.
JOHNSON, S.D., LINDER, H P. & STEINER, K.E. 1998. Phylogeny
and radiation of pollination systems in Disa (Orchidaceae).
American Journal of Botany 85: 402—41 1 .
JORDAAN, M. 1997a. Amaranthaceae, Annonaceae, Aristolochiaceae,
Balanophoraceae, Basellaceae, Bruniaceae, Cabombaceae, Can-
nabaceae, Caryophyllaceae, Casuarinaceae, Ceratophyllaceae,
Chenopodiaceae, Chrysobalanaceae, Connaraceae, Cunoni-
aceae, Droseraceae, Escalloniaceae, Fagaceae, Fumariaceae,
Gisekiaceae, Grubbiaceae, Hamamelidaceae, Hernandiaceae,
Hydnoraceae, Hydrostachyaceae, Illecebraceae, Lauraceae,
Menispertnaceae, Menyanthaceae, Molluginaceae, Monimi-
aceae, Montiniaceae, Moraceae, Moringaceae, Myricaceae,
Myrothamnaceae, Neuradaceae, Nyctaginaceae, Olacaceae,
Opiliaceae, Papaveraceae, Phytolaccaceae, Pittosporaceae,
Podostemaceae, Portulacaceae, Rafflesiaceae, Resedaceae,
Roridulaceae, Salicaceae, Ulmaceae,.Urticaceae, Vahliaceae. In
N.L. Meyer, M. Mossmer, & G.F. Smith, Taxonomic literature
of southern African plants. Strelitzia 5: 41—43, 47, 60, 63—68,
70-72, 80-84, 88, 89,95-99, 101, 102, 104-106, 110, 118, 119.
JORDAAN, M 1997b. Amaranthaceae, Basellaceae, Chenopodiaceae,
Menispermaceae, Molluginaceae, Moraceae, Moringaceae,
Phytolaccaceae, Piperaceae, Portulacaceae, Urticaceae. In G.F.
Smith, E.J van Jaarsveld, T.H. Arnold, F.E. Steffens, R.D.
Dixon & J.A. Retief. List of southern African succulent plants:
12, 13, 41, 42, 51, 52, 88,123-128, 138-141, 145-147, 156,
157. Umdaus Press, Pretoria.
JORDAAN, M. & BURGOYNE, P. 1997. Santalaceae. In N.L. Meyer,
M. Mossmer, & G.F. Smith, Taxonomic literature of southern
African plants. Strelitzia 5: 110, 111.
JORDAAN, M. & DREYER, L.L. 1997a. Aizoaceae, Brassicaceae,
Capparaceae. In N.L. Meyer, M. Mossmer, & G.F. Smith, Taxon-
omic literature of southern African plants. Strelitzia 5: 40, 41,
61-65.
JORDAAN, M. & DREYER, L.L. 1997b. Aizoaceae. In G.F. Smith,
E.J. van Jaarsveld, T.H. Arnold, F.E. Steffens, R.D. Dixon &
J.A. Retief, List of southern African succulent plants: 3—5.
JORDAAN, M. & FELLINGHAM! A.C. 1997. Rosaceae. In N.L.
Meyer, M. Mossmer, & G.F. Smith, Taxonomic literature of
southern African plants. Strelitzia 5: 106, 107.
JORDAAN, M. & SMITH, G.F. 1997. Piperaceae. In N.L. Meyer, M.
Mossmer & G.F. Smith, Taxonomic literature of southern
African plants. Strelitzia 5: 101.
KURZWEIL, H. 1997a. New names in southern African orchids. South
African Orchid Journal 28: 123—130.
KURZWEIL, H. 1997b. Orchidaceae. In G.F. Smith, E.J. van Jaarsveld,
T.H. Arnold, F.E. Steffens, R.D. Dixon & J.A. Retief, List of south-
ern African succulent plants: 129, 130. Umdaus Press, Pretoria.
KURZWEIL, H. & ARCHER, C. 1997. Orchidaceae. In N.L. Meyer,
M. Mossmer & G.F. Smith, Taxonomic literature of southern
African Plants. Strelitzia 5: 133—135.
KURZWEIL, H„ LILTVED, B. & LINDER, H.P. 1997. A new species
of Disa (Orchidaceae) from the Western Cape of South Africa.
Nordic Journal of Botany 17: 353—360.
LEISTNER, O.A. 1997a. How to write articles for publication.
SABONET News 2: 85, 86.
LEISTNER, O.A. 1997b. Review: Tree atlas of southern Africa/
Boomatlas van Suider-Afrika. Section/Seksie 1, compiled by
Fried & Jutta von Breitenbach. Bothalia 27: 97.
LEISTNER, O.A. 1997c. Review: Flora of Great Britain and Ireland,
Volume 5: Butomaceae— Orchidaceae, by Peter Sell & Gina
Murrell. 1 996. Bothalia 27: 2 1 1.
LEISTNER, O.A. & KIMPTON, J 1997. Pavonia praemorsa. Flower-
ing Plants of Africa 55: 86—90, t. 2136.
LOW, A B. & REBELO, A.G. (eds). 1998. Vegetation of South Africa.
Lesotho and Swaziland. 2nd edn. Department of Environmental
Affairs and Tourism, Pretoria.
MAGILL, RE. & VAN ROOY, J. 1998. Bryophyta 1,3. Flora of south-
ern Africa. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria.
MANNING, J.C. 1997. Letter: (Un)popular names. Veld & Flora 83: 94.
MANNING, J.C. & GOLDBLATT, P. 1997a. The Moegistorhynchus
longirostris (Diptera: Nemestrinidae) pollination guild: long-
tubed flowers and a specialized long-proboscid fly pollination
system in southern Africa. Plant Systematics and Evolution
206: 51-69.
MANNING, J.C. & GOLDBLATT, P. 1997b. Wild Flower Guide 9:
Nieuwoudtville. The Botanical Society.
MANNING, J.C., GOLDBLATT, P. & ARCHER, C. 1997. Iridaceae.
In N.L. Meyer, M. Mossmer, & G.F. Smith, Taxonomic litera-
ture of southern African plants. Strelitzia 5: 130—132.
MCDONALD, D.J. 1997a. The conservation of the southern African
Alpine Zone and its contribution to alpine gardening.
Proceedings of Southern Alpines ‘96.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
259
MCDONALD, D.J. 1997b. The National Vegetation Map of South
Africa Project. SABONET News 2: 68, 69.
MCDONALD, D.J. 1997c. VEGMAP: a collaborative project for a
new vegetation map of southern Africa. South African Journal
of Science 93: 424—426.
MCDONALD, D J , ANDERSON. J.H. & VAN ROOY, J. 1997. Review:
Biodiversity and conservation of neotropical montane forests,
edited by S.P. Churchill, H. Balsev, E. Forero & L. Luteyn.
1995. Bothalia 27: 98, 99.
MCKENZIE. B. & REBELO, A.G. 1997. Cape flora conservation
areas on the Cape Flats. A report for the Botanical Society.
Flora Conservation Committee.
MEYER, N.L. 1997. Alliaceae, Anthericaceae, Asparagaceae, Colchi-
caceae, Dracaenaceae, Eriospermaceae, Liliaceae, Luzuri-
agaceae, Smilacaceae. In N.L. Meyer, M. Mossmer, & G.F.
Smith, Taxonomic literature of southern African plants.
Strelitzia 5: 121, 124. 127, 128, 133, 145.
MEYER. N.L. & GLEN. H.F. 1997. Arecaceae. In N.L. Meyer, M.
Mossmer & G.F. Smith, Taxonomic literature of southern
African plants. Strelitzia 5: 122, 123.
MEYER. N.L., MOSSMER, M. & SMITH, G.F. (eds). 1997. Taxon-
omic literature of southern African plants. Strelitzia 5: 1—164.
MEYER, N.L., SMITH, G.F. & GLEN, H.F. 1997. Asphodelaceae. In
N.L. Meyer, M. Mossmer & G.F. Smith, Taxonomic literature
of southern African plants. Strelitzia 5: 123.
MEYER, N.L. & WILLIAMS. R. 1997. Hyacinthaceae. In N.L. Meyer,
M. Mossmer, & G.F. Smith, Taxonomic literature of southern
African plants. Strelitzia 5: 128—130.
MIDGLEY. G.F., VESTE, M„ VON WILLERT, D.J., DAVIS, G.W.,
STEINBERG, M. & POWRIE, L.W. 1997. Comparative field
performance of three different gas exchange systems. Bothalia
27: 83-89.
OLIVER, E.G.H. 1997. A new species of Erica from the Western Cape.
Bothalia 27: 142-144.
OLIVER. E.G.H. 1997. Ericaceae. In N.L. Meyer, M. Mossmer, & G.F.
Smith, Taxonomic literature of southern African plants.
Strelitzia 5: 71, 72.
OLIVER. E.G.H. 1998. Erica, a biodiversity record for plants?
Yearbook of the Heather Society 1998: 1,2.
OLIVER. E.G.H. & OLIVER, I.M. 1998. Erica schumannii, a new
mat-forming species from South Africa. Yearbook of the
Heather Society 1998: 32—38.
PALMER, A.R. & HOFFMAN, M.T. 1997. Nama-Karoo. In R.M.
Cowling, D.M. Richardson & S.M. Pierce, Vegetation of south-
ern Africa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
PEROLD, S.M. 1997a. Studies in the liverwort genus Fossombronia
(Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 1 . Three new species from
Northern Province, Gauteng and Mpumalanga. Bothalia 27:
17-27.
PEROLD, S.M. 1997b. Studies in the liverwort genus Fossombronia
(Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 2. An amendment to three
species from Western Cape, described by S.W. Arnell. Bothalia
27: 29-38.
PEROLD, S.M. 1997c. Studies in the liverwort genus Fossombronia
(Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 3. An amendment to F.
spinifolia. Bothalia 27: 39—42.
PEROLD, S.M. 1997d. Studies in the liverwort genus Fossombronia
(Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 4. A re-examination of F.
crispa, F. leucoxantha and F. tumida. Bothalia 27: 105—115.
PEROLD, S.M. 1997e. The lectotypification of Fossombronia crispa
(Metzgeriales— Fossombroniaceae). Bothalia 27: 137—139.
PEROLD, S.M. 1997f. Hepaticae. In N.L. Meyer, M. Mossmer & G.F.
Smith, Taxonomic literature of southern African plants. Stre-
litzia 5: 7—13.
PHILLIPSON, P.B. & CONDY, G. 1997. Oeceoclades decaryana.
Flowering Plants of Africa 55: 48—53, t. 2129.
REBELO, A. (Tony) 1997a. Letter: Vloekname and volksname. Veld &
Flora 83: 94.
REBELO, A.G. (ed.). 1997b. Protea Atlas Newsletter 34. Protea Atlas
Project, University of Cape Town.
REBELO, A.G. (ed ). 1997c. Protea Atlas Newsletter 35. Protea Atlas
Project, University of Cape Town.
REBELO. A.G. 1997d. Conservation In R.M. Cowling, D M.
Richardson & S.M. Pierce, Vegetation of southern Africa. Cam-
bridge University Press, Cambridge.
REBELO, A.G. 1997e. The Eastern Cape interim distribution map, edn
2. Protea Atlas Project, University of Cape Town.
REBELO, A.G. & REBELO. P. (eds). 1997a. Protea Atlas Newsletter
36. Protea Atlas Project, University of Cape Town.
REBELO, A.G. & REBELO, P. (eds). 1997b. Protea Atlas Newsletter
37. Protea Atlas Project, University of Cape Town.
RETIEF, E. 1997. Asphodelaceae, Hyacinthaceae, Rubiaceae. Vit-
aceae, Zygophyllaceae. In G.F. Smith, E.J. van Jaarsveld, T.H
Arnold, F.E. Steffens, R.D. Dixon & J.A. Retief, List of south-
ern African succulent plants: 34—36, 82,83, 148, 149, 160, 161.
164. 165. Umdaus Press, Pretoria.
RETIEF. E. & CONDY, G. 1997. Croton gratissimus var. gratissimus.
Flowering Plants of Africa 55: 64—68, t. 2132.
RETIEF. E. & HERMAN, P.P.J 1997. Plants of the northern provinces
of South Africa: keys and diagnostic characters. Strelitzia 6.
RETIEF, E. & VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. 1997a. A new species of
Rhoicissus from the Eastern Cape. Bothalia 27: 49—51.
RETIEF, E. & VAN JAARSVELD, E.J 1997b. Dracaenaceae, Hya-
cinthaceae. In G.F. Smith, E.J van Jaarsveld, T.H. Arnold, F.E.
Steffens. R.D. Dixon & J.A. Retief, List of southern African
succulent plants: 68, 69, 82, 83. Umdaus Press, Pretoria.
RETIEF. E. & VAN WYK, A.E. 1997. Palynology of southern African
Boraginaceae: the genera Lobostemon , Echiostachys and Echium.
Gratia 36: 271-278.
REYNOLDS, P.Y. 1997. Design of a prototype hypermedia plant in-
formation system for NBL M.A. Inf.Sc. thesis. University of
Pretoria.
RICHARDS, K. & BROWN, N.A.C. 1997. Restios in the landscape
(The Cape reeds’ ornamental potential). Parks & Grounds 97:
44-47.
ROFF. J., NONJINGE, S. & CROUCH, N. 1997. Conjuring up a Zulu
muthi garden An exciting new educational resource in the
Natal National Botanical Garden. Veld & Flora 83: 72, 73.
ROURKE. J.P 1997a. A new species of Leucadendron from the west-
ern Little Karoo (Proteaceae). Bothalia 27: 52—55.
ROURKE, J.P. 1997b. Penaeaceae. In N.L. Meyer, M. Mossmer, &
G.F. Smith, Taxonomic literature of southern African plants.
Strelitzia 5: 100.
ROURKE. J.P. & JORDAAN, M. 1997. Proteaceae. In N.L. Meyer, M.
Mossmer, & G.F. Smith. Taxonomic literature of southern
African plants. Strelitzia 5: 103.
ROURKE. J.P & RETIEF, E. 1997. Stilbaceae. In N.L Meyer, M.
Mossmer, & G.F Smith, Taxonomic literature of southern
African plants. Strelitzia 5: 1 16.
ROURKE, J.P & WARD-HILHORST, ELLAPHIE. 1997. Serruria
roxburghii. Flowering Plants of Africa: 54—58, t. 2130.
ROUX, J.P. 1997a. The morphology and cytology of a new Poly-
stichum (Ptendophyta: Dryopteridaceae) hybrid from South
Africa. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 124: 375—
381.
ROUX, J.P. 1997b. A new species of Polystichum (Pteridophyta:
Dryopteridaceae) from South Africa. Botanical Journal of the
Linnean Society 125: 35—43.
ROUX, J.P. 1997c. Pteridophyta. In N.L. Meyer, M. Mossmer, & G.F.
Smith, Taxonomic literature of southern African plants. Stre-
litzia 5: 31-35.
RUTHERFORD. M.C. 1997. Categorization of biomes. In R.M.
Cowling, D.M. Richardson & S.M. Pierce, Vegetation of south-
ern Africa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
SCOTT, L„ ANDERSON, J.M. & ANDERSON, H.M. 1997. The early
vegetation history. In R.M. Cowling, D.M. Richardson & S.M.
Pierce, Vegetation of southern Africa: 62—84. Cambridge Uni-
versity Press. Cambridge.
SINGH, Y. & BREDENKAMP, C.L. 1997. Sapotaceae. In N.L Meyer,
M. Mossmer, & G.F. Smith, Taxonomic literature of southern
African plants. Strelitzia 5: 111. 112.
SINGH, Y. & GLEN, R.P. 1997. Acoraceae, Araceae. In N.L. Meyer,
M. Mossmer, & G.F. Smith, Taxonomic literature of southern
African plants. Strelitzia 5: 121, 122.
SMITH, G.F. 1997a. 24th & 25th Congresses of the International
Organisation for Succulent Plant Study (IOS). Taxon 46: 129.
SMITH, G.F. 1997b. Administrative procedures of the South African
Journal of Botany. Forum Botanicum 34: 9, 10, 14.
SMITH, G.F. 1997c. Agavaceae. In G.F. Smith, E.J. van Jaarsveld, T.H
Arnold, F.E. Steffens, R.D. Dixon & J.A. Retief, List of south-
ern African succulent plants: I . Umdaus Press, Pretoria.
SMITH, G.F. 1997d. Agavaceae. In N.L. Meyer, M. Mossmer & G.F.
Smith, Taxonomic literature of southern African plants.
Strelitzia 5: 121.
SMITH, G.F. 1997e. Progress with the Species Plantarum Project.
South African Journal of Science 93: 387, 388.
SMITH, G.F. 1997f. The desert garden of the Huntington Botanical
Gardens: one of the great gardens of the world. Aloe 34: 90—94.
260
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
SMITH, G.F 1997g. Unlocking the literature to the taxonomy of south-
ern African plants. SABONET News 2: 34, 35.
SMITH, G.F. I997h. List of southern African succulent plants.
SABONET News 2: 76, 77.
SMITH, G.F. 1997i. Valuable books found. Bothalia 27: 237.
SMITH, G.F. I997j Valuable books found. Forum Botanicum 34: 15,
16.
SMITH, G.F., CROUCH, N.R. & CONDY, G. 1997a. Gasteria
croucheri. Flowering Plants of Africa 55: 20—23, t. 2124.
SMITH, G.F., CROUCH, N.R. & CONDY, G. 1997b. Haworthia limi-
folia var. limifolia. Flowering Plants of Africa 55: 24—29, t.
2125.
SMITH, G.F. & DAVIS, G.W. 1997. South African botany’s links with
Kew restored: SABLO back on track. Forum Botanicum 34: 1 .
SMITH, G.F. & HARTZER, P 1997. (1293-1294) Proposals to con-
serve the names Mossia and M. intervallaris (Atzoaceae)
against their earlier homonyms. Taxon 46: 349, 350.
SMITH, G.F.. HARTZER, P, VAN WYK, B-E. & CONDY, G. 1997.
Mossia intervallaris. Kew Magazine 310: 16—22.
SMITH, G.F. & MAUSETH, J.D. 1997a. Restructuring of the Board of
the IOS. IOS Bulletin 6,3: 26.
SMITH, G.F. & MAUSETH, J.D 1997b. A new membership category.
IOS Bulletin 6,3: 27.
SMITH, G.F. & STEYN, E M. A. 1997. Rhipsalis baccifera subsp.
mauritiana : the correct name of the indigenous southern
African cactus (Cactaceae). Bothalia 27: 135.
SMITH, G.F., STEYN, E.M.A., VAN WYK, A.E. & CONDY, G. 1997.
Gasteria bicolor var. bicolor. Flowering Plants of Africa 55:
14-18, t. 2123.
SMITH, G.F. & SWARTZ, P. 1997. Re-establishment of Aloe suzannae
in Madagascar. Part 1. The way to the Red Island. British
Cactus and Succulent Journal 15: 88—93.
SMITH. G.F., VAN JAARSVELD, E.J., ARNOLD, T.H., STEFFENS,
F.E., DIXON, R.D. & RETIEF, J.A. (eds). 1997. List of south-
ern African succulent plants. Umdaus Press, Pretoria.
SMITH, G.F., VAN JAARSVELD, E.J., VAN WYK, B-E. & TAYLOR,
S. 1997. Portulaca rhodesiana, a succulent hitherto unrecorded
in southern Africa (Portulacaceae). Bothalia 27: 139, 140.
SMITH, G.F, VAN WYK, B-E., VILJOEN, A. & CONDY, G. 1997.
Plectranthus spicatus. Flowering Plants of Africa 55: 102—106,
t. 2139.
SMITH, G.F. & WILLIAMSON, G. 1997. Leslie Charles Leach
(1909-1996). Taxon 46: 374, 375.
SMITH, G.F. & WILLIS, C K. (eds). 1997. Index herbariorum: south-
ern African supplement. Southern African Botanical Diversity
Network Report No. 2. SABONET, Pretoria.
SMITH, G.F., WOLFSON, M.M. & DAVIS, G.W. 1997. Is botany
growing in South Africa?— response to Esler. South African
Journal of Science 93: 317, 318.
SMITHIES, S J 1997a. Bignoniaceae, Gesneriaceae, Lentibulariaceae,
Pedaliaceae. In N.L. Meyer, M. Mossmer, & G.F. Smith,
Taxonomic literature of southern African plants. Strelitzia 5: 60,
81, 85, 100.
SMITHIES, S J 1997b. Pedaliaceae, Scrophulariaceae. In G.F. Smith,
E.J. van Jaarsveld, T.H Arnold, F.E. Steffens, R.D. Dixon &
J.A. Retief, List of southern African succulent plants: 134, 135,
152, 153. Umdaus Press, Pretoria.
SMITHIES, S.J. & STEINER, K.E. 1997. Scrophulariaceae. In N.L.
Meyer, M Mossmer, & G.F. Smith, Taxonomic literature of
southern African plants. Strelitzia 5: 112, 115.
SNIJMAN, D A 1997 Dr Deirdre Snijman, 1997 Herbert Medalist, an
autobiography. Herbertia 52: 18, 19.
SNIJMAN, D A. & ARCHER, RTF 1997. Amaryliidaceae, Hypoxid-
aceae. In N.L Meyer, M. Mossmer, & G.F. Smith, Taxonomic
literature of southern African plants. Strelitzia 5: 121, 122, 130.
SPIES, J J., VAN WYK, S.M.C., NIEMAN, I.C. & LIEBENBERG,
E.J.L 1997. Cytogenetic studies in some representatives of the
subfamily Pooideae (Poaceae) in South Africa. 3. The tribe
Poeae. Bothalia 27: 75-82.
STEINER, K.E 1998. Beetle pollination of peacock moraeas (Irid-
aceae) in South Africa. Plant Systematics and Evolution 209:
47-65.
STEYN, E M. A 1997a. A literature list of published information on Aloe
suzannae Decary (1921—1996). In G.F. Smith & P. Swartz, Re-
establishment of Aloe suzannae in Madagascar. Part I . The way to
the Red Island British Cactus and Succulent Journal 1 5: 92, 93.
STEYN, E M. A. 1997b. Apiaceae, Cornaceae, Geissolomaceae, Myr-
sinaceae, Plumbaginaceae, Primulaceae. In N.L. Meyer, M.
Mossmer & G.F. Smith, Taxonomic literature of southern
African plants. Strelitzia 5: 43—46, 69, 81, 97, 101, 103.
STEYN, E M. A. & SMITH, G.F. 1997. Ovule structure in Trachyandra
saltii (Asphodelaceae). South African Journal of Botany 63:
223-226.
STEYN, E M. A & SMITH, G.F. 1998. Greyia flanaganii, tree of the
year, 1998. Veld & Flora 84: 14, 15.
SWARTZ, P. 1997a. Die rooi eiland wat in die see in bloei. Veld &
Flora 83: 114-116.
SWARTZ, P. 1997b. Guidelines to /Voteri-growing. Parks & Grounds
99:50,51.
SWARTZ, P 1997c. Re-establishment of Aloe suzanne in Madagascar.
Part 2: groundwork on the Red Island. British Cactus and
Succulent Journal 15: 149—155.
SWARTZ, P. 1997d. Waterwise landscaping. Parks & Grounds 99:
38-41.
SYMMONDS, R„ BIRCHER, C. & CROUCH, N. 1997. Bulb scaling
and seed success with Bowiea volubilis. PlantLife 17: 25, 26.
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. 1997a. Amaryliidaceae, Apiaceae, Apocyn-
aceae, Araliaceae, Asparagaceae, Burseraceae, Eriospermaceae,
Lamiaceae, Passifloraceae. In G.F. Smith, E.J. van Jaarsveld.
T.H. Arnold, F.E. Steffens, R.D. Dixon & J.A. Retief. List of
southern African succulent plants: 14—21, 32, 33, 47, 48, 70,
84,85,132,133.
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. 1997b. Veld gardening in South Africa: the
forest garden. Veld & Flora 83: 51—55.
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. 1997c. Gardening with gabions. Veld & Flora
83: 56, 57.
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. 1997d. People (and plants and stones) in glass
houses ... What’s inside the new Botanical Society Conserva-
tory at Kirstenbosch? Veld & Flora 83: 75—79.
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. & HANKEY, A. 1997. Plectranthus venteri
Van Jaarsv. & Hankey spec. nov. (Lamiaceae), a new species
from the Northern Province, South Africa. Aloe 34: 40, 41
VAN JAARSVELD, E.J. & SMITH, G.F. 1997. Aloaceae. In S.
Oldfield, Cactus and succulent plants — status survey and con-
servation action plan. IUCN/SSC Cactus and Succulent
Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland and Cambridge.
VAN ROOY, J. 1997a. Distribution of Bryum viguieri Ther. (Bry-
aceae), a new record for the moss flora of southern Africa.
Journal of Bryology 19: 830—832.
VAN ROOY, J 1997b. Introduction to bryology in southern Africa. 2.
The structure and life cycle of mosses. PlantLife 17: 27—29
VAN ROOY, J. 1997c. Musci. In N.L. Meyer, M. Mossmer, & G.F.
Smith, Taxonomic literature of southern African plants. Stre-
litzia 5: 13—29.
VAN ROOY, J 1997d. New and interesting records of mosses in the
Flora of southern Africa area: 4. New records and geographic
regions. Bothalia 27: 136, 137.
VAN ROOY, J 1998. Introduction to bryology in southern Africa. 3.
The collection and preservation of bryophytes. PlantLife 18:
19-21.
VICTOR, J. 1997a Asclepiadaceae, Loganiaceae, Myrtaceae, Ole-
aceae, Rutaceae, Salvadoraceae. In N.L. Meyer, M. Mossmer.
& G.F. Smith, Taxonomic literature of southern African plants.
Strelitzia 5: 47-50, 85, 97, 98, 109, 1 10.
VICTOR, J. 1997b. Asclepiadaceae. In G.F. Smith, E.J. van Jaarsveld,
TH. Arnold, F.E. Steffens, R.D. Dixon & J.A. Retief, List of
southern African succulent plants: 22—31. Umdaus Press,
Pretoria.
WELMAN, W.G. 1997a. Acanthaceae, Campanulaceae, Convolvul-
aceae, Cucurbitaceae, Dipsacaceae, Goodeniaceae, Lobeli-
aceae, Myoporaceae, Plantaginaceae, Retziaceae, Solanaeeae,
Sphenocleaceae, Valerianaceae In N.L Meyer, M. Mossmer &
G.F. Smith, Taxonomic literature of southern African plants.
Strelitzia 5: 39, 40, 64, 69, 70, 82, 85,97, 101, 105, 115, 116, 119.
WELMAN, W.G 1997b. Convolvulaceae, Cucurbitaceae, Goodeni-
aceae. In G.F. Smith, E.J. van Jaarsveld, T.H. Arnold, F.E.
Steffens, R .D. Dixon & J.A. Retief, List of southern African
succulent plants: 54, 55, 64, 65, 8 1 . Umdaus Press, Pretoria.
WELMAN, W.G. 1997c. Valid publication of Wahlenbergia uiten-
hagensis var. debilis (Campanulaceae). Bothalia 27: 140.
WELMAN, W.G. I997d Two exotic taxa of Ipomoea and Merremia in
southern Africa (Convolvulaceae). Bothalia 27: 141.
Bothalia 28,2: 261-269 (1998)
Guide for authors to Bothalia
This guide is updated when necessary and includes an
index. Important points and latest additions appear in
bold type.
Bothalia is named in honour of General Louis Botha,
first Premier and Minister of Agriculture of the Union of
South Africa. This house journal of the National Bota-
nical Institute, Pretoria, is devoted to the furtherance of
botanical science. The main fields covered are taxonomy,
ecology, anatomy and cytology. Two parts of the journal
and an index to contents, authors and subjects are pub-
lished annually.
1 Editorial policy
1.1 Bothalia welcomes original papers dealing with
flora and vegetation of southern Africa and related sub-
jects. Full-length papers and short notes, as well as book
reviews and obituaries of botanists, are accepted. The edi-
tor should be notified that an article is part of a series
of MSS; please submit a list of the parts of a series; all
parts should preferably be published in one journal.
1.2 Page charges: As stated in our notification includ-
ed in volume 23,1 (May 1993), MSS submitted for pub-
lication in Bothalia are subject to payment of page
charges of R 125,00 per printed page, VAT included. The
following are exempt from these charges: 1, NBI mem-
bers; 2, persons/institutions who have been granted
exemption by the Executive Committee of the NBI; 3,
authors of contributions requested by the Editor; 4, con-
tributors to the column 1 FSA contributions’. The Editor’s
decision on the number of pages is final. An invoice will
be sent to the author, who must arrange for payment as
soon as possible to NBI, Publications Section, Private
Bag XI 01, Pretoria 0001.
1.3 Articles are assessed by referees, both local and
overseas. Authors are welcome to suggest possible refer-
ees to judge their work. Authors are responsible for the
factual correctness of their contributions. Bothalia main-
tains an editorial board (see title page) to ensure that
international standards are upheld.
2 Requirements for a manuscript
2.1 The original manuscript should be typed on one
side of A4-size paper, double-spaced throughout (includ-
ing abstract, tables, captions to figures, literature refer-
ences, etc.) and have a margin of at least 30 mm all round.
Three photocopies (photocopied on both sides of the
paper to reduce weight for postage) of all items, includ-
ing text, line drawings, tables and lists should be submit-
ted, and the author should retain a complete set of copies.
Three photographs (or high quality photocopies) of
each photograph/photograph mosaic should be sub-
mitted for review purposes. If the article was generated
on a computer, a copy of the diskette should be submitted
with the final (accepted) version (see 3).
2.2 Papers should conform to the general style and lay-
out of recent issues of Bothalia (from volume 26
onwards).
2.3 Material should be presented in the following
sequence: Title page with title, name(s) of author(s), key-
words, abstract (and information that should be placed in
a footnote on the title page, such as address(es) of
author(s) and mention of granting agencies.
2.4 The sequence continues with Introduction and
aims. Contents (see 8), Material and methods. Results,
Interpretation (Discussion), Specimens examined (in
revisions and monographs). Acknowledgements, Refer-
ences, Index of names (recommended for revisions deal-
ing with more than about 15 species), Tables, Captions
for figures and figures. In the case of short notes, obitu-
aries and book reviews, keywords and abstract are super-
fluous.
2.5 All pages must be numbered consecutively begin-
ning with the title page to those with references, tables
and captions for figures.
2.6 For notes on the use of hyphens and dashes see
3. 10 to 3.12.
2.7 Special character: use your own word or code that
is unique and self-explanatory, enclosed between
ANGLE BRACKETS, e.g. <mu>m for pm. Please sup-
ply us with a list of the codes.
3 Requirements for diskettes/stiffies
(to be submitted only with final/accepted version)
3. 1 data must be IBM compatible and written in ASCII,
or in Word for Windows 95 from Windows 1; Word
for MS-DOS from MSWord 3; WordPerfect 5 for
DOS only; Windows Write 3 onwards.
3.2 the original printout of the diskette should be sup-
plied in double line spacing.
3.3 tables need not be placed on the diskette — a clearly
laid out hard copy is adequate.
3.4 use a non-breaking space to keep two elements to-
gether on the same line, e.g. 3 500.
3.5 do not justify lines.
3.6 do not break words, except hyphenated words.
3.7 all lines, headings, keys, etc., should start Hush at
the margin, therefore no indentations, footnotes or tabs
of any kind.
3.8 in Word and WordPerfect, italics and bold should
be used where necessary.
3.9 paragraphs and headings are delineated by a car-
riage return (ENTER) but no indentation.
3.10 a hyphen is designated as one dash, with no space
between the letter and the dash, e.g. ovate-lanceolate.
See also 17.6.
3.11 an N-dash is typed as three hyphens with no
space between the letter and the hyphen, e.g. 2 5 mm
(typeset, it looks like this, 2-5 mm).
3.12 an M-dash is typed as two hyphens with no space
between the letter and the hyphen, e.g. computers- -what
a blessing! (typeset, it looks like this: computers — what).
262
Bothalia 27,2 (1997)
3.13 do not use a double space between words, after com-
mas, full stops, colons, semicolons or exclamadon marks.
3.14 use lower case x as times sign, with one space on
either side of the x, e.g. 2x3 mm.
3.15 use single (not double) opening and closing
quotes, e.g. the so-called ‘stiffy ’ refers to a rigid diskette.
3.16 keys — put only three leader dots before number
of taxon (with one space before and one space after the
first and last dot), regardless of how far or near the word
is from the right margin, e.g. ... 1. R. ovata (see 13.18).
4 Author(s)
When there are several authors the covering letter
should indicate clearly which of them is responsible for
correspondence and, if possible, telephonically available
while the article is being processed. The contact address
and telephone number should be mentioned if they differ
from those given on the letterhead.
5 Title
The title should be as concise and as informative as
possible. In articles dealing with taxonomy or closely
related subjects the family of the taxon under discussion
(see also 13.2) should be mentioned in brackets but
author citations should be omitted from plant names
(see also 13.6).
6 Keywords
Up to 10 keywords (or index terms) should be pro-
vided in English in alphabetical sequence. The follow-
ing points should be borne in mind when selecting key-
words:
6.1 keywords should be unambiguous, internationally
acceptable words and not recently coined little-known
words.
6.2 they should be in a noun form and verbs should be
avoided.
6.3 they should not consist of an adjective alone;
adjectives should be combined with nouns.
6.4 they should not contain prepositions.
6.5 the singular form should be used for processes and
properties, e.g. evaporation.
6.6 the plural form should be used for physical objects,
e.g. augers.
6.7 location (province and/or country); taxa (species,
genus, family) and vegetation type (community, veld
type, biome) should be used as keywords.
6.8 keywords should be selected hierarchically where
possible, e.g. both family and species should be includ-
ed.
6.9 they should include terms used in the title.
6. 10 they should answer the following questions:
6.10.1 what is the active concept in the document
(activity, operation or process).
6.10.2 what is the passive concept or object of the
active process (item on which the activity, operation or
process takes place).
6.10.3 what is the means of accomplishment or how is
the active concept achieved (technique, method, appara-
tus, operation or process).
6.10.4 what is the environment in which the active
concept takes place (medium, location).
6.10.5 what are the independent (controlled) and
dependent variables?
6.11 questions 6.10.1 to 6.10.3 should preferably also
be answered in the title.
7 Abstract
7.1 Abstracts of no more than 200 words should be
provided. Abstracts are of great importance and should
convey the essence of the article.
7.2 They should refer to the geographical area con-
cerned and, in taxonomic articles, mention the number of
taxa treated. They should not contain information not
appearing in the article.
7.3 In articles dealing with taxonomy or closely relat-
ed subjects all taxa from the rank of genus downwards
should be accompanied by their author citations (see also
13.6).
7.4 Names of new taxa and new combinations should
not be italicized. If the article deals with too many taxa,
only the important ones should be mentioned.
8 Table of contents
A table of contents should be given for all articles
longer than about 40 typed pages, unless they follow the
strict format of a taxonomic revision.
9 Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements should be kept to the minimum
compatible with the requirements of courtesy. Please
give all the initials of the person(s) you are thanking.
10 Literature references
In text
10.1 Literature references in the text should be cited as
follows: ‘Jones & Smith (1986) stated...’, or ‘...(Jones &
Smith 1986)’ or (Ellis 1988: 67) when giving a reference
simply as authority for a statement. For treatment of lit-
erature references in taxonomic papers see 14.
1 0.2 When more than two authors are involved in the
paper, use the name of the first author followed by et al.
10.3 When referring to more than one literature refer-
ence, they should be arranged chronologically and sep-
arated by a semicolon, e.g. (Nixon 1940; Davis 1976;
Anon. 198), 1984).
10.4 Titles of books and names of journals should
preferably not be mentioned in the text. If there is good
reason for doing so, they should be treated as described
in 10.12 & 10.13.
Bothalia 27,2 (1997)
263
10.5 Personal communications are given only in the
text, not in the list of references. Please add the person’s
full initials to identify the person more positively, e.g. C.
Boucher pers. comm.
In References at end of article
10.6 References of the same author are arranged in
chronological sequence.
1 0.7 Where two or more references by the same author
are listed in succession, the author’s name is repeated
with every reference, except in an obituary, where the
name of the deceased in the list of publications (not in
the references) is replaced by an N-dash.
10.8 All publications referred to in the text, including
those mentioned in full in the treatment of correct names
in taxonomic papers, but no others, and no personal
communications, are listed at the end of the manuscript
under the heading References.
10.9 The references are arranged alphabetically
according to authors and chronologically under each
author, with a, b, c, etc. added to the year, if the author
has published more than one work in a year. This
sequence is retained when used in the text, irrespec-
tive of the chronology.
10.10 If an author has published both on his own and
as a senior author with others, the solo publications are
listed first and after that, in strict alphabetical sequence,
those published with one or more other authors.
10.1 1 Author names are typed in capitals.
10.12 Titles of journals and of books are written out in
full and are italicized as follows: Transactions of the
Linnean Society of London 5: 171-217, or Biology and
ecology of weeds: 24.
10.13 Titles of books should be given as in Taxonomic
literature , edn 2 by Stafleu & Cowan and names of jour-
nals as in the latest edition of World list of scientific peri-
odicals.
10.14 Examples of references:
Collective book or Flora
BROWN, N.E. 1909. Asclepiadaceae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora
capensis 6,2: 518-1036. Reeve, London.
CUNNINGHAM, A.B 1994. Combining skills: participatory
approaches in biodiversity conservation. In B.J. Huntley, Botanical
diversity in southern Africa. Strelitzia 1: 149-167. National Botanical
Institute, Pretoria.
Book
DU TOIT, A.L. 1966. Geology of South Africa , 3rd edn, S.M.
Haughton (ed.). Oliver & Boyd, London.
HUTCHINSON, J. 1946. A botanist in southern Africa. Gawthom,
London.
Journal
DAVIS, G. 1988. Description of a proteoid-restioid stand in Mesic
Mountain Fynbos of the southwestern Cape and some aspects of its ecol-
ogy. Bothalia 1 8: 279-287.
SMOOK, L. & GIBBS RUSSELL, G.E 1985. Poaceae. Memoirs of
the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 51: 45-70.
STEBBINS, G.L. Jr 1952. Aridity as a stimulus to plant evolution.
American Naturalist 86: 35-44.
In press , in preparation
TAYLOR, H.C. in press. A reconnaissance of the vegetation of
Rooiberg State Forest. Technical Bulletin, Department of Forestry.
VOGEL, J.C. 1982. The age of the the Kuiseb river silt terrace at
Homeb. Palaeoecology of Africa 15. In press.
WEISSER, P.J., GARLAND, J.F. & DREWS, B.K. in prep Dune ad-
vancement 1937-1977 and preliminary vegetation succession chronol-
ogy at Mlalazi Nature Reserve. Natal, South Africa. Bothalia.
Thesis
KRUGER, F.J. 1974. The physiography and plant communities of the
Jakkalsrivier Catchment. M.Sc. (Forestry) thesis. University of Stel-
lenbosch.
MUNDAY, J 1980. The genus Monechma Hochst. (Acanthaceae tribe
Justiciae) in southern Africa. M.Sc. thesis. University of the
Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
Miscellaneous paper, report, unpublished article, techni-
cal note, congress proceedings
ANON, no date. Eetbare plante van die Wolkberg. Botanical Research
Unit, Grahamstown. Unpublished
BAWDEN, M.G. & CARROL, D M. 1968. The land resources of
Lesotho. Land Resources Study No. 3, Land Resources Division,
Directorate of Overseas Surveys, Tolworth.
BOUCHER, C. 1981. Contributions of the Botanical Research
Institute In A.E.F. Heydom, Proceedings of workshop research in
Cape estuaries: 105-107. National Research Institute for Oceanology,
CSIR, Stellenbosch.
NATIONAL BUILDING RESEARCH INSTITUTE 1959. Report of
the committee on the protection of building timbers in South Africa
against termites, woodboring beetles and fungi, 2nd edn. CSIR Research
Report No. 169.
1 1 Tables
11.1 Each table should be presented on a separate sheet
and be assigned an Arabic numeral, i.e. the first table
mentioned in the text is marked ‘Table 1’.
1 1 .2 In the captions of tables the word ‘TABLE’ is
written in capital letters. See recent numbers of Bothalia
for the format required.
11.3 Avoid vertical lines, if at all possible. Tables can
often be reduced in width by interchanging primary hor-
izontal and vertical heads.
12 Figures
12.1 Figures should be planned to fit, after reduction,
into a width of either 80, 118 or 165 mm, with a maxi-
mum vertical length of 230 mm. Allow space for the cap-
tion in the case of figures that will occupy a whole page.
12.2 Line drawings, including graphs and diagrams,
should be twice the size of the final reproduction and
should be in jet-black Indian ink, preferably on fine Felix
Schoeller parole or similar paper, 200 gsm, or tracing
film. Lines should be bold enough and letters/symbols
large enough to stand reduction.
12.3 Photographs should be of excellent quality on
glossy paper with clear detail and moderate contrast, and
they should be the same size as required in the journal.
12.4 Photograph mosaics should be submitted com-
plete, the component photographs mounted neatly on a
white flexible card base (can be curved around drum
of scanner) leaving a narrow gap of uniform width (2
mm) between each print. Note that grouping pho-
264
Bothalia 27,2 (1997)
tographs of markedly divergent contrast results in poor
reproductions.
12.5 Lettering and numbering on all figures should be
done in letraset, stencilling or a comparable method. If
symbols are to be placed on a dark background it is rec-
ommended that black symbols are used on a small white
disk ± 7 mm in diameter and placed in the lower left
hand corner of the relevant photo.
12.6 If several illustrations are treated as components
of a single composite figure they should be designated
by capital letters.
12.7 Note that the word ‘Figure’ should be written out
in full, both in the text and the captions and should begin
with a capital ‘F’ (but see 14.7 for taxonomic papers).
12.8 In the text the figure reference is then written as in
the following example: ‘The stamens (Figure 4A, B, C)
are...’
12.9 In captions, ‘FIGURE’ is written in capital letters.
Magnification of figures should be given for the size as
submitted.
12.10 Scale bars or scale lines should be used on fig-
ures.
12.11 In figures accompanying taxonomic papers,
voucher specimens should be given in the relevant cap-
tion.
12.12 Figures are numbered consecutively with Arabic
numerals in the order they are referred to in the text.
These numbers, as well as the author’s name and an indi-
cation of the top of the figure, must be written in soft
pencil on the back of all figures.
12.13 Captions of figures must not be pasted under the
photograph or drawing.
12.14 Authors should indicate in pencil in the text
where they would like the figures to appear.
12.15 Authors wishing to have the originals of figures
returned must inform the editor in the original covering let-
ter and must mark each original ‘To be returned to author’.
12.16 Authors wishing to use illustrations already pub-
lished must obtain written permission before submitting
the manuscript and inform the editor of this fact.
12.17 Captions for figures should be collected togeth-
er and typed at the end of the MS and headed Captions
for figures.
12.18 It is strongly recommended that taxonomic arti-
cles include dot maps as figures to show the distribution
of taxa. The dots used must be large enough to stand
reduction to 80 mm (recommended size: letraset 5 mm
diameter). No open diamonds or open triangles should
be used.
12.19 Blank distribution maps of southern Africa,
Africa and the world are available from the Bookshop,
NBI Pretoria.
1 3 Text
13.1 As a rule, authors should use the names (but not
of all authors of plant names — see 13.6) as listed by T.H.
Arnold & B.C. de Wet (eds) in Memoirs of the Botanical
Survey of South Africa No. 62.
13.2 Names of genera and infrageneric taxa are usu-
ally italicized, with the author citation (where relevant;
see 13.6) not italicized. Exceptions include names of
new taxa in the abstract, correct names given in the syn-
opsis or in paragraphs on species excluded from a given
supraspecific group in taxonomic articles; in checklists
and in indices, where the position is reversed, correct
names are not italicized and synonyms are italicized.
13.3 Names above generic level are not italicized.
13.4 In articles dealing with taxonomy, the complete
scientific name of a plant (with author citation) should be
given at the first mention in the text. The generic name
should be abbreviated to the initial thereafter, except
where intervening references to other genera with the
same initial could cause confusion (see 16.6).
13.5 In normal text, Latin words are italicized, but
in the synopsis of a species, Latin words such as nom.
nud. and et al. are not italicized (see 14.3, 16.4, 17.9).
13.6 In accordance with Garnock-Jones & Webb
(1996) in Taxon 45: 285, 286, authors of plant names are
not to be added to plant names except in taxonomic
papers. Names of authors of plant names should agree
with the list published by the Royal Botanic Gardens,
Kew, entitled, Authors of plant names, edited by R.K.
Brummitt & C.E. Powell (1992). {
13.7 Modern authors not included in the list should
use their full name and initials when publishing new
plant names. Other author names not in the list should
be in agreement with the recommendations of the Code.
13.8 Names of authors of publications are written out in
full except in the synonymy in taxonomic articles where
they are treated like names of authors of plant names.
13.9 Names of plant collectors are italicized whenever
they are linked to the number of a specimen. The collec-
tion number is also italicized, e.g. Acocks 14407.
13.10 Surnames beginning with ‘De’, ‘Du’ or ‘Van’
begin with a capital letter unless preceded by an initial.
13.11 For measurements use only units of the Inter-
national System of Units (SI). In taxonomic papers
only mm and m, should be used; in ecological papers
cm or m should be used.
13.12 The use of ‘±’ is preferred to c. or ca (see 17.7).
13.13 Numbers ‘one’ to ‘nine’ are spelled out in nor-
mal text, and from 10 onwards they are written in Arabic
numerals.
13.14 In descriptions of plants, numerals are used
throughout. Write 2. 0-4. 5 (not 2-4.5). When counting
members write 2 or 3 (not 2-3), but 2-4.
13.15 Abbreviations should be used sparingly but con-
sistently. No full stops are placed after abbreviations
ending with the last letter of the full word (e.g. edition =
edn; editor = ed.); after units of measure; after compass
directions; after herbarium designations; after coun-
tries, e.g. USA and after well-known institutions, e.g.
CSIR.
13.16 Apart from multi-access keys, indented keys
should be used with couplets numbered la-lb, 2a-2b,
etc. (without full stops thereafter).
Bothalia 27,2 (1997)
265
13.17 Keys consisting of a single couplet have no
numbering.
13.18 Manuscripts of keys should be presented as in
the following example:
la Leaves closely arranged on an elongated stem; a sub-
merged aquatic with only the capitula exserted ... lb. E.
setaceum var. pumilum
lb Leaves in basal rosettes; stems suppressed; small
marsh plants, ruderals or rarely aquatics:
2a Annuals, small, fast-growing pioneers, dying when
the habitat dries up; capitula without coarse white setae;
receptacles cylindrical:
3a Anthers white ... 2. E. cinereum
3b Anthers black ... 3. E. nigrum
2b Perennials, more robust plants; capitula sparsely to
densely covered with short setae:
13.19 Herbarium voucher specimens should be referred
to wherever possible, not only in taxonomic articles.
14 Species treatment in taxonomic papers
14.1 The procedure to be followed is illustrated in the
example (17.9), which should be referred to, because not
all steps are described in full detail.
14.2 The correct name (bold, not italicized) is to be fol-
lowed by its author citation (italicized) and the full liter-
ature reference, with the name of the publication written
out in full (not italicized).
14.3 Thereafter all literature references, including
those of the synonyms, should only reflect author, page
and year of publication, e.g. C.E. Hubb. in Kew Bulletin
15: 307 (1960); Boris et al.: 14 (1966); Boris: 89 (1967);
Sims: t. 38 (1977); Sims: 67 (1980).
14.4 The description and the discussion should consist
of paragraphs commencing, where possible, with itali-
cized leader words such as flowering time , etymology,
diagnostic characters, distribution and habitat.
14.5 When more than one species of a given genus is
dealt with in a paper, the correct name of each species
should be prefixed by a sequential number followed by a
full stop. Infraspecific taxa are marked with small letters,
e.g. lb., 12c., etc.
14.6 Names of authors are written as in 13.6, irrespec-
tive of whether the person in question is cited as the
author of a plant name or of a publication.
14.7 The word ‘figure’ is written as ‘fig.’, and ‘t.’ is
used for both ‘plate’ and ‘tablet’ (but see 12.7 for normal
text).
14.8 Literature references providing good illustrations
of the species in question may be cited in a paragraph
commencing with the word Illustrations followed by a
colon. This paragraph is given after the last paragraph of
the synonymy, see 17.9.
14.9 When new combinations are made, the full litera-
ture reference must be given for the basionym, e.g.:
Antimima saturata (L.Bolus) H.E.K. Hartmann,
comb. nov.
Ruschia saturata L.Bolus in Notes on Mesembrianthemum and allied
genera, part 2: 122 (1929). Mesembryanthemum atrocinctum N.E.Br.:
32 (1930). Type: Pillans BOL18952 (BOL. holo.!).
15 Citation of specimens
15.1 Type specimen in synopsis: the following should
be given (if available): country (if not in RSA), province,
grid reference (at least for new taxa), locality as given by
original collector, modern equivalent of collecting locality
in square brackets (if relevant, e.g. Port Natal [now Dur-
ban]), quarter-degree square, date of collection (option-
al), collector’s name and collecting number (both itali-
cized).
15.2 The abbreviation s.n. ( sine numero ) is given after
the name of a collector who usually assigned numbers to
his collections but did not do so in the specimen in ques-
tion. The herbaria in which the relevant type(s) are
housed are indicated by means of the abbreviations given
in the latest edition of Index Herbariorum.
15.3 The holotype (holo.) and its location are men-
tioned first, followed by a semicolon, the other herbaria
are arranged alphabetically, separated by commas.
15.4 Authors should indicate by means of an exclama-
tion mark (!) which of the types have been personally
examined.
15.5 If only a photograph or microfiche was seen,
write as follows: Anon. 422 (X, holo.-BOL, photo.!).
15.6 Lectotypes or neotypes should be chosen for cor-
rect names without a holotype. It is not necessary to lec-
totypify synonyms.
15.7 When a lectotype or a neotype are newly chosen,
this should be indicated by using the phrase ‘here desig-
nated’ (see 17.9). If reference is made to a previously
selected lectotype or neotype, the name of the designating
author and the literature reference should be given. In
cases where no type was cited, and none has subsequent-
ly been nominated, this may be stated as ‘not designated’.
15.8 In brief papers mentioning only a few species
and a few cited specimens the specimens should be
arranged according to the grid reference system:
Provinces/countries (typed in capitals) should be cited
in the following order: Namibia, Botswana, Northern
Province (previously Northern Transvaal), North-West
(previously northeastern Cape and southwestern Trans-
vaal), Gauteng (previously PWV), Mpumalanga (pre-
viously Eastern Transvaal), Free State (previously
Orange Free State), Swaziland, KwaZulu-Natal (previ-
ously Natal), Lesotho, and Northern Cape, Western
Cape and Eastern Cape (Figure 1).
15.9 Grid references should be cited in numerical se-
quence.
15.10 Locality records for specimens should preferably
be given to within a quarter-degree square. Records from
the same one-degree square are given in alphabetical
order, i.e (-AC) precedes (-AD), etc. Records from the
same quarter-degree square are arranged alphabetically
according to the collectors’ names; the quarter-degree ref-
erences must be repeated for each specimen cited.
266
Bothalia 27,2 (1997)
15.11 The relevant international code of the herbaria in
which a collection was seen should be given in brackets
after the collection number; the codes are separated by
commas. The following example will explain the proce-
dure:
KWAZULU-NATAL. — 2731 (Louwsburg): 16 km E of Nongoma,
(-DD), Pelser 354 (BM, K, PRE); near Dwarsrand, Van der Merwe
4789 (BOL, M). 2829 (Harrismith): near Groothoek, (-AB), Smith
234\ Koffiefontein, (-AB), Taylor 720 (PRE); Cathedral Peak Forest
Station, (-CC), Marriot 74 (KMG); Wilgerfontein, Roux 426. Gnd ref.
unknown: Sterkstroom, Strydom 12 (NBG).
15.12 For records from outside southern Africa authors
should use degree squares without names, e.g.:
KENYA. — 0136: Nairobi plains beyond race course, Napier 485.
15.13 Monographs and revisions: in the case of all
major works of this nature it is assumed that the author
has investigated the relevant material in all major
herbaria and that he has provided the specimens seen
with determinavil labels. It is assumed further that the
author has submitted distribution maps for all relevant
taxa and that the distribution has been described briefly
in words in the text. Under the heading ‘Vouchers’ no
more than five specimens should be cited, indicating
merely the collector and the collector’s number (both
italicized). Specimens are alphabetically arranged
according to collector’s name. If more than one speci-
men by the same collector is cited, they are arranged
numerically and separated by a comma. The purpose of
the cited specimens is not to indicate distribution but to
convey the author’s concept of the taxon in question.
15.14 The herbaria in which the specimens are housed
are indicated by means of the abbreviation given in the
latest edition of Index Herbariorum. They are given
between brackets, arranged alphabetically and separat-
ed by commas behind every specimen as in the follow-
ing example:
Vouchers: Arnold 64 (PRE); Fisher 840 (NH, NU, PRE); Flanagan 831
(GRA, PRE), 840 (NH, PRE); Marloth 4926 (PRE, STE); Schelpe
6161, 6163. 6405 (BOL); Schlechter 4451 (BM, BOL, GRA, K, PRE).
15.15 If long lists of specimens are given, they must be
listed together before Acknowledgements under the head-
ing Specimens examined. They are arranged alphabetical-
ly by the collector's name and then numerically for each
collector. The species is indicated in brackets by the num-
ber that was assigned to it in the text and any infraspecific
taxa by a small letter. If more than one genus is dealt with
in a given article, the first species of the first genus men-
tioned is indicated as 1.1. This is followed by the interna-
tional herbarium designation. Note that the name of the
collector and the collection number are italicized:
Acocks 12497 (2.1b) BM, K, PRE; 14724 (1.13a) BOL, K, P. Archer
1507 ( 1.4) BM. G. Burchell 2847 (2.8c) MB, K. Human 2401 (3.3)
MO, S. B.L. Burtt 789 (2.6) B, KMG, STE.
16 Synonyms
16.1 In a monograph or a revision covering all of
southern Africa, all synonyms based on types of southern
African origin, or used in southern African literature,
should be included.
16.2 Illegitimate names are designated by nom. illeg.
after the reference, followed by non with the author and
date, if there is an earlier homonym.
16.3 Nomina nuda (nom. nud.) and invalidly published
names are excluded unless there is a special reason to
cite them, for example if they have been used in promi-
nent publications.
16.4 In normal text Latin words are italicized, but in
the synopsis of a species Latin words such as nom. nud.,
et al. are not italicized (see 1 3.5, 14.3, 17.9).
16.5 Synonyms should be arranged chronologically
into groups of nomenclatural synonyms, i.e. synonyms
based on the same type, and the groups should be
arranged chronologically by basionyms, except for the
basionym of the correct name which is dealt with in the
paragraph directly after that of the correct name.
16.6 When a generic name is repeated in a given syn-
onymy it should be abbreviated to the initial, except
where intervening references to other genera with the
same initial could cause confusion (see 13.4).
1 7 Description and example of species treatment
17.1 Descriptions of all taxa of higher plants should,
where possible, follow the sequence: Habit; sexuality;
underground parts (if relevant). Indumentum (if it can be
easily described for the whole plant). Stems/branches.
Bark. Leaves : arrangement, petiole absent/present,
pubescence; blade: shape, size, apex, base, margin; mid-
rib: above/below, texture, colour; petiole; stipules.
Inflorescence : type, shape, position; bracts/bracteoles.
Flowers', shape, sex. Receptacle. Calyx. Corolla. Disc.
Androecium. Gynoecium. Fruit. Seeds. Chromosome num-
ber (reference). Conservation status. Figure (word written
out in full) number.
17.2 As a rule, shape should be given before measure-
ments.
17.3 In general, if an organ has more than one of the
parts being described, use the plural, otherwise use the sin-
gular, for example, petals of a flower but blade of a leaf.
17.4 Language must be as concise as possible, using
participles instead of verbs.
17.5 Dimension ranges should be cited as in 17.9.
17.6 Care must be exercised in the use of dashes and
hyphens. A hyphen is a short stroke joining two syllables
of a word, e.g. ovate-lanceolate or sea-green, with no
space between the letter and the stroke. An N-dash (en)
is a longer stroke commonly used instead of the word
‘to’ between numerals, ‘2-5 mm long’ (do not use it
between words but rather use the word ‘to’, e.g. ‘ovate to
lanceolate’; it is produced by typing three hyphens next
to each other. An M-dash (em) is a stroke longer than an
N-dash and is used variously, e.g. in front of a subspe-
cific epithet instead of the full species name; it is pro-
duced by typing two hyphens next to one another.
1 7.7 The use of ‘±’ is preferred to c. or ca when describ-
ing shape, measurements, dimensions, etc. (see 13.12).
17.8 The decimal point replaces the comma in all
units of measurement, e.g. leaves 1.0-1. 5 mm long.
Bothalia 27,2 (1997)
267
17.9 Example:
1. Englerophytum magalismontanum (Sond.)
T.D.Penn. The genera of Sapotaceae: 252 (1991). Type:
Gauteng, Magaliesberg, Zeyher 1849 (S, holo.-BOL,
photo.!).
Bequaertiodendron magalismontanum (Sond.) Heine & Hemsl.: 307
(1960); Codd: 72 (1964); Elsdon: 75 (1980).
Chrysophyllum magalismontanum Sond.; 721 (1850); Harv.: 812
(1867); Engl.: 434 (1904); Bottmar: 34 (1919). Zeyherella magalis-
montana (Sond.) Aubrev. & Pellegr.: 105 (1958); Justin: 97 (1973).
Chrysophyllum argyrophyllum Hiem: 721 (1850); Engl.: 43 (1904).
Boivinella argyrophylla (Hiem) Aubrev. & Pellegr.: 37 (1958); Justin
et al.: 98 (1973). Types: Angola, Welwitsch 4828 (BM!, lecto., here des-
ignated; PRE!); Angola, Welwitsch 4872 (BM!).
Chrysophyllum wilmsii Engl.: 4, t. 16 (1904); Masonet: 77 (1923);
Woodson: 244 (1937). Boivinella wilmsii (Engl.) Aubrev. & Pellegr.:
39 (1958); Justin: 99 (1973). Type: Mpumalanga, Magoebaskloof,
Wilms 1812 [B, holo.t; K!, P!, lecto., designated by Aubrev. & Pellegr.:
38 (1958), PRE!, S!,W!,Z!f.
Bequaertiodendron fruticosa De Wild.: 37 (1923), non Bonpl.: 590
(1823); D.Bakker: 167 (1929); H.Fr: 302 (1938); Davy: 640 (1954);
Breytenbach: 117 (1959); Clausen: 720 (1968); Palmer: 34 (1969).
Type: Mpumalanga, Tzaneen Dist., Granville 3665 (K, holo.!; G!, P!,
PRE!, S!).
B. fragrans auct. non Oldemann: Glover: 149, t. 19 (1915); Henkel:
226 (1934); Stapelton: 6 (1954).
Illustrations: Harv.: 812 (1867); Henkel: t. 84 (1934?); Codd: 73
(1964); Palmer: 35 (1969).
Woody perennial; main branches up to 0.4 m long,
erect or decumbent, grey woolly-felted, leafy. Leaves lin-
ear to oblanceolate, 3— 10(— 23) x 1.0-1.5(-4.0) mm,
obtuse, base broad, half-clasping. Heads heterogamous,
campanulate, 7-8 x 5 mm, solitary, sessile at tip of axil-
lary shoots; involucral bracts in 5 or 6 series, inner exceed-
ing flowers, tips subopaque, white, very acute. Receptacle
nearly smooth. Flowers ± 23-30, 7-11 male, 16-21 bisex-
ual, yellow, tipped pink. Achenes ± 0.75 mm long, elliptic.
Pappus bristles very many, equalling corolla, scabridu-
lous. Chromosome number: 2n = 22. Figure 23B.
18 New taxa
18.1 The name of a new taxon must be accompanied
by at least a Latin diagnosis. Authors should not provide
full-length Latin descriptions unless they have the
required expertise in Latin at their disposal.
18.2 It is recommended that descriptions of new taxa
be accompanied by a good illustration (line drawing or
photograph) and a distribution map.
18.3 Example:
109. Helichrysum jubilatum Hilliard, sp. nov.
H. alsinoidei DC. affinis, sed foliis ellipticis (nec spatu-
latis), inflorescentiis compositis a foliis non circumcinc-
tis, floribus femineis numero quasi dimidium hermaph-
roditorum aequantibus (nec capitulis homogamis vel
floribus femineis 1-3 tantum) distinguitur.
Herba annua e basi ramosa; caules erecti vel decum-
bentes, 100-250 mm longi, tenuiter albo-lanati, remote
foliati. Folia plerumque 8-30 x 5-15 mm, sub capitulis
minora, elliptica vel oblanceolata, obtusa vel acuta, mu-
cronata, basi semi-amplexicauli, utrinque cano-lanato-
arachnoidea. Capitula heterogama, campanulata, 3. 5^1.0
x 2.5 mm, pro parte maxima in paniculas cymosas termi-
nales aggregata; capitula subterminalia interdum solitaria
vel 2 vel 3 ad apices ramulorum nudorum ad 30 mm lon-
gorum. Bracteae involucrales 5-seriatae, gradatae, exteri-
ores pellucidae, pallide stramineae, dorso lanatae, serie-
bus duabus interioribus subaequalibus et flores quasi
aequantibus, apicibus obtusis opacis niveis vix radian-
tibus. Receptaculum fere laeve. Flores ± 35 — 4 1 . Achenia
0.75 mm longa, pilis myxogenis praedita. Pappi setae
multae, corollam aequantes, apicibus scabridis, basibus
non cohaerentibus.
TYPE. — Northern Cape, 2817 (Vioolsdrif): Richters-
veld, (-CC), ± 5 miles E of Lekkersing on road to Stink-
fontein, kloof in hill south of road, annual, disc whitish,
7-11-1962, Nordenstam 1823 (S, holo.; E, NH, PRE).
19 New provinces of South Africa (Oct. 1996)
FIGURE 1. — 1, Western Cape; 2, Eastern Cape; 3, Northern Cape; 4,
Free State (previously Orange Free State); 5, KwaZulu-Natal
(previously Natal); 6, North-West (previously northeastern
Cape and southwestern Transvaal); 7, Gauteng (previously
PWV); 8, Mpumalanga (previously Eastern Transvaal); 9,
Northern Province (previously Northern Transvaal).
20 Proofs
Only page proofs are normally sent to authors. They
should be corrected in red ink and be returned to the edi-
tor as soon as possible. Do not add any new information.
21 Reprints
Authors receive 100 reprints free. If there is more
than one author, this number will have to be shared
between them.
22 Documents consulted
Guides to authors of the following publications were
made use of in the compilation of the present guide: An-
nals of the Missouri Botanic Garden, Botanical Journal
of the Linnean Society, Flora of Australia, Smithsonian
Contributions to Botany, South African Journal of Bot-
any (including instructions to authors of taxonomic
papers), South African Journal of Science.
268
Bothalia 27,2 (1997)
23 Address of editor
Manuscripts should be submitted to: The Editor,
Bothalia, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag XI 01,
Pretoria 0001 .
24 FSA contributions
24. 1 Figures and text must conform to Bothalia format.
24.2 These articles will be considered as a full contri-
bution to the Flora of southern Africa and will be listed
as published in the ‘ Plan of Flora of southern Africa',
which appears in all issues of the FSA series.
INDEX
abbreviation, 13.4, 13.5, 13.12, 13.15, 14.7, 15.2, 15.14, 16.2, 16.3,
16.4, 16.6
abstract, 2.1, 2.3, 7, 13.2
acknowledgements, 9
address of
authors, 2.3, 4
editor, 23
alphabetical, 6, 10.3, 10.9, 10.10, 15.3, 15.10, 15.13, 15.14, 15.15
Arabic numerals, 11.1, 12.12, 13.3
ARNOLD, T.H. & DE WET, B.C. (eds) 1993. Plants of southern
Africa: names and distribution. Memoirs of the Botanical
Survey of South Africa No. 62, 13.1
ASCII, 3.1
author(s), 1, 2.1, 4, 10.14, 12.14
address, 2.3, 4
citation, 5, 7.3, 13.2, 13.4, 13.6, 14.2
first, 10.2
names, 2.3, 10.3, 10.7, 10.9, 10.11, 12.12, 13.7, 13.8, 14.3, 14.6,
15.7, 16.2
names of plant names, 5, 7.3, 13.6, 13.7, 13.8
senior, 10.10
book reviews, 1.1, 2.4
books, 10.4, 10.12, 10.13, 10.14
Bothalia, 1, 2.2, 1 1.2, 22
brief taxonomic articles, 15.8
BRUMMITT, R.K. & POWELL, C.E (eds) 1992. Authors of plant
names Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 13.6
c„ 13.12, 17.7
ca, 13.12, 17.7
Cape, 15.8, 18.3, 19
capitals, 11.2, 12.6, 12.9, 14.2, 15.8
captions, 2. 1,2.4, 2.5, 11.2, 12.7, 12.9, 12.11, 12.13, 12.17
checklist, 13.2
chromosome number, 17.1, 1 7.9
chronological sequence, 10.3, 10.6, 10.9, 16.5
citation
author, 5, 7.3, 13.2, 13.4, 13.6, 14.2
literature, 14.4
of specimens, 15
cm, 13.1 1
collection
date, 15. 1
number, 13.9, 15.1, 15.2, 15.11, 15.13, 15.15
collective book, 10.15
collector, 13.9, 15.1, 15.2, 15.10, 15.13, 15.15
colon, 3. 13
comma, 3.13, 15.13
compass directions, 13.15
composite figure, 12.6
congress proceedings, 10.14
contents, 8
correspondence, 4
countries, 6.7, 15.8
decimal point, 17.8
description and example of species treatment, 17
diagrams, 12.2
discussion, 2.4, 14.4
diskette, 1, 3, 3.4
distribution maps, 12.18, 12.19, 15.13, 18.2
documents consulted, 22
DOS, 3.1
dot maps, 12.18, 12.19, 15.13, 18.2
double
line spacing, 3.2
space, 2.1, 3.13
drawing paper, 12.2
drawings, 12.2
Eastern Transvaal, see Mpumalanga
edition, 13.15
editor, 13.15, 22
editorial
board, 1
policy, 1
etal., 10.2, 13.5, 14.3, 17.9
example of
new taxa, 18.3
species treatment, 17.9
exclamation mark, 3.13, 15.4
family name, 5, 6.7
fig., 14.7
figure(s), 12, 14.7, 17.1
reduction of, 12.1, 12.2, 12.18
returned, 12.15
first author, 10.2
flora, 1, 10.14
Flora of southern Africa, 24
footnote, 2.3, 3.7
Free' State (previously Orange Free State), 15.8, 19
FSA contributions, 24
full stop, 3.13, 13.15, 13.16, 14.5
GARNOCK-JONES, P.J. & WEBB, C.J 1996. The requirement to cite
authors of plant names in botanical journals. Taxon 45: 285,
286, 13.6
Gauteng (previously PWV), 15.8, 17.9, 19
genera, 13.2
generic name, 13.3, 13.4, 16.6
geographical area, 7.2
granting agencies, 2.3
graphs, 12.2
grid reference system, 15.1, 15.8, 15.9, 15.11
headings, 3.7, 3.9
sequence of, 2.3, 2.4
herbaria, 15.2, 15.3, 15.11, 15.13, 15.14
herbarium
code, 15.11
designations, 13.15, 15.15
voucher specimens, 12.12, 13.19
here designated, 15.7, 17.9
holo., 15.5, 17.9, 18.3
holotype, 15.3, 15.6
homonym, 16.2
hyphenated words, 2.6
hyphen, 3.10-3.12, 17.6
IBM compatible, 3.1
illegitimate names (nom. illeg.), 16.2
illustrations, 12.4, 12.6, 12.16, 14.8, 17.9
previously published, 12.16
indentations, 3.7, 3.9
Index Herbaria rum, 15.2, 15.14
index of names, 2.4
infrageneric taxa, 13.2
initials, 9, 10.5, 13.7
in prep., 10.14
in preparation, 10.14
in press, 10.14
International
Code of Botanical Nomenclature, 13.7
System of Units (SI), 13.11
invalidly published names, 16.3
italics, 7.4, 10.12, 13.2, 13.3, 13.5, 13.9, 14.2, 15.1, 15.13, 15.15
journals, 10.4, 10.12, 10.14
names of, 10.1, 10.13
justify, 3.5
keys, 3.7, 2.16, 13.16, 13.17, 13.18
keywords, 2.3, 2.4, 6
KwaZulu-Natal (previously Natal), 15.8, 19
Latin, 13.5, 15.2, 16.2, 16.3, 16.4
descriptions, 1 8. 1
layout, 2.2
Bothalia 27,2 (1997)
269
lecto., 15.6, 15.7, 17.9
lectotype, 15.6, 15.7, 17.9
letraset, 12.5, 12.18
lettering, 12.5
line
drawings, 2.1, 12.2, 18.2
spacing, 3.4, 3.9
literature
citations, 14.4
references, 2.1, 10, 10.7
within synonymy, 10.7, 14.8
localities outside southern Africa, 15.12
locality, 15.1, 15.10
m, 13.11
magnification of figures, 12.4, 12.9
manuscript
language, 1, 17.4
requirements, 2
map, distribution, dot, 12.18, 12.19, 15.13, 18.2, 19
M-dash, 3.12, 17.6
mm, 13.11
margin, 2.1, 3.7, 3.16, 17.1
material, 2.3, 2.4
measurements, 13.11, 17.2, 17.7, 17.8
methods, 2.4, 6.10.3
microfiche, 15.5
miscellaneous paper, 10.14
monograph, 2.4, 15.13, 16.1
Mpumalanga (previously Eastern Transvaal), 15.8, 19
MSWord, 3.1, 3.8
name(s)
collector’s, 15.10
illegitimate, 16.2
invalidly published, 16.3
of author(s), 2.3, 10.7, 10.9, 10.11, 13.7, 13.8, 14.6
of authors of plant names, 5, 13.1, 13.2, 13.6, 14.6
of publications, 13.8
Natal, see KwaZulu-Natal, 15.8, 19
N-dash, 3.11, 17.6
neotype, 15.6, 15.7
new
combinations, 7.4, 14.9
provinces of South Africa (Oct. 1996), 15.8, 19
taxa, 7.4, 13.2, 13.7, 15.7, 18
nom. illeg., 16.2
nom. nud., 13.5, 16.3, 16.4
non-breaking space, 3.4
Northern Province, see Northern Transvaal, 15.8, 19
North-West, 15.8, 19
notes, 1, 2.4, 10.14
technical, 10.14
number
chromosome, 17.1, 17.9
page, 3.2
numbering, 13.13
figures, 12.5, 12.12, 17.1
keys, 13.16, 13.17
pages, 2.5, 13.4
taxa, 3.16, 7.2, 13.4, 14.5, 15.15
numerals, Arabic, 11.1, 12.12, 13.3
obituaries, 1.1, 2.4, 10.7
Orange Free State, see Free State, 15.8, 19
page charges, 1 .2
PC diskettes, 3
pers. comm., 10.5, 10.8
personal communications (pers. comm ), 10.5, 10.8
photocopies, 2.1
photograph, 12.3, 12.4, 12.13, 15.5, 18.2
mosaic, 2.1, 12.4
plant
collectors, 13.9
name, 5, 13.4, 13.6, 13.7, 13.8, 14.6
plate (t.), 14.7
prepositions, 6.4
proceedings, 10.14
proofs, 20
provinces, 6.7, 15.1, 15.8
of South Africa, 15.8, 19
publications, 10.8, 13.8, 14.3
name of, 14.2
solo, 10.10
year of, 10.9, 14.3
PWV, see Gauteng, 15.8, 19
quarter-degree squares, 15.1, 15.10
quotes, 3.15
reduction of figures, 12.1, 12.2, 12.18
referees, 1
reference, 2.4, 10.6, 10.7, 10.9, 10.14
figure, 12.8
grid, 15.1, 15.8, 15.9, 15.11
list, 10.5, 10.8, 10.9
literature, 2.1, 10, 10.7
report, 10.14
reprints, 21
requirements for
diskette, 3
manuscript, 2
results, 2.4
revision, 2.4, 8, 15.13, 16.1
scale bar, 12.10
semicolon, 3.13, 10.3, 15.3, 15.13
senior author, 10.10
sequence of headings, 2.3, 2.4
short notes, 1, 2.4
special character, 2.7
species treatment in taxonomic papers, 14
specimens examined, 2.4, 15.15
square brackets, 15.1, 17.9
STAFLEU, F A. & COWAN, R.S. 1976-1988. Taxonomic literature.
Vols 1-7, 10.13
stiffy/stiffies, 3
surnames, 13.10
symbols, 12.5
synopsis, 13.2, 13.5, 15.1, 16.4
synonymy, 10.7, 13.8, 14.4, 14.8, 16.6
t„ 14.3, 14.7, 17.9
table, 2.1, 2.4, 2.5, 3.3, 11
of contents, 8
tablet (t.), 14.7
tabs, 3.7
taxa
name of, 3.16, 5, 7.4, 10.8, 13.2, 13.3
new, 7.4, 13.2, 13.7, 15.7, 18
numbering of, 3. 16, 7.2, 13.4, 14.5, 15.15
taxonomic
articles/papers, 7.2, 10.8, 12.11, 12.18, 13.2, 13.6, 13.8, 14
revision, 8
taxonomy, 5, 7.3, 13.4, 15.8
technical note, 10.15
text, 2.1, 10.1, 10.4, 10.5, 10.8, 11.1, 12.7, 12.8, 12.12, 12.14, 13,
15.13, 15.15. 16.4
thesis, 10.15
times sign, 3.14
title, 2.3, 5, 6.9, 6.11
of books, 10.4, 10.12, 10.13, 10.14
of journals, 10.4, 10.12, 10.13, 10.14
page, 1, 2.3, 2.5
Transvaal, 15.8, 17.9, 19
type, 15.2, 15.4, 15.7, 16.1, 16.6, 17.9
here designated, 15.7, 17.9
not designated, 15.7
specimen, 15.1
units of measure, 13.11, 13.15
unpublished article, 10.14
vouchers, 15.13, 15.14
voucher specimens, 12.11, 13.19
Windows Write, 3.1
Word for Windows, 3. 1
WordPerfect, 3.1, 3.8
World list of scientific periodicals, 10.13
year of publication, 10.9, 14.3
Bothalia 28,2: 271-297 (1998)
THE HISTORY OF THE BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
1903-1989
DENISE FOURIE*
INTRODUCTION
The 85-year history of the Botanical Research Insti-
tute (BRI) falls naturally into three distinct periods. The
first covers the 36 years from the foundation in 1903
until the retirement of Dr I.B. Pole Evans. The second is
the 33-year span which culminated with the move in
1972 to the new headquarters in the botanical garden
established 26 years earlier. The third and final period of
17 years ended with the amalgamation of the BRI with
the National Botanic Gardens of South Africa in 1989.
Throughout its lifespan a number of people were to play
significant roles both in the development of the organisa-
tion and in the research undertaken in various fields of
botanical science. The Botanical Research Institute was
fortunate to have been served by a large number of loyal
and efficient staff from all ranks, throughout its history.
THE EARLY YEARS AND FIRST ERA, 1903-1939
Interest in the flora of South Africa was stimulated
long before Jan van Riebeeck established his first settle-
ment in the Cape in 1652. Numerous plants had been
taken back to Europe by travellers who had touched at
various spots on this southern tip of Africa. Justus
Heurnius, a missionary from Leiden, is considered to be
the father of botany in South Africa and his first collec-
tions were described as long ago as 1664. Gradual
knowledge of both the fauna and flora of the country
grew due to contributions by professional collectors,
missionaries and other travellers.
The first appointment of an official botanist in the
country was made for the Cape in 1858 when Carl Pappe
(Figure 1), a medical practitioner, was appointed as
Colonial Botanist. Pappe already had considerable botan-
ical experience and had gained a wide knowledge of the
country to which he had immigrated from Germany 27
years earlier. On his death in 1 862, Pappe’s post was filled
by the Reverend John Croumbie Brown (Figure 2), but
within four years the post was abolished for financial rea-
sons and Brown returned to Scotland to continue his work
in the ministry. The post was not re-instated until 1891
when Peter MacOwan (Figure 3) was appointed as
Government Botanist. For the previous 12 years
MacOwan had been Director of the Cape Town Botanic
Gardens, formerly the Dutch East India Company’s gar-
den. He had also been Curator of the Cape Government
Herbarium which had been established by Pappe. When
the Cape Town municipality took over the Botanic Garden
to establish a public park, MacOwan severed his connec-
* Formerly: National Botanical Institute. Present address: P.O. Box 1668,
6600 Plettenberg Bay, South Africa.
tions with them, and accepted the post of Government
Botanist, which he held until his retirement in 1905.
Meanwhile, to the north, in the Transvaal in 1898,
Miss Reino Leendertz (Figure 4) had been appointed as
the first official botanist in the Zuid-Afrikaanse
Republiek in a post at the Staatsmuseum in Pretoria. She
was also the first woman civil servant employed by the
Z.A.R. A large collection of plants had been purchased
from Rudolf Schlechter and these formed the nucleus of
the Staatsmuseum Herbarium. Leendertz returned to Hol-
land after the Anglo-Boer War but was not happy as a
teacher there and in 1904 returned to her old post in
South Africa. She started a special Transvaal herbarium
at the museum, collecting around Pretoria on her bicycle
and also further afield in the province and gradually built
up a notable representation of the flora.
With the exception of a few agricultural societies,
there had thus far been no agricultural organisation at all
in the Transvaal. It was only when the Colony came
under British rule after the Anglo-Boer War that a
Department of Agriculture was established. Although its
herbarium contains many earlier collections, the Botan-
ical Research Institute traces its origin back to 1903,
FIGURE 1. — Dr Carl Pappe.
272
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 2. — Rev. John Croumbie Brown.
FIGURE 4. — Miss Reino Leendertz.
FIGURE 3. — Peter MacOwan.
FIGURE 5. — Joseph Burtt Davy. Head of the Division of Botany,
Department of Agriculture, 1903-1913.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
273
FIGURE 6. — ‘Volkstem’ Building,
Pretorius St, Pretoria — Burtt
Davy’s first office.
when Englishman Joseph Burtt Davy (Figure 5) was
appointed as botanist and agrostologist in the newly
formed post-war Agricultural Department.
Unlike MacOwan in the Cape, Burtt Davy had no pre-
vious experience or knowledge of the flora of his new
homeland. He had been on the staff of Kew in London as
a technical assistant in 1891, but as a result of poor
health, had moved to the United States of America in
1892. There he worked as a botanist and agriculturist
before accepting his new appointment in the Transvaal,
where he started work in 1903.
His office was situated in the old Volkstem Building
(Figure 6) in Pretorius St, Pretoria, which had been erect-
ed in 1898 for the Volkstem newspaper but was subse-
quently taken over by the new government authorities.
The building still stands today and is preserved as a
national monument.
Like MacOwan in the Cape, Burtt Davy directed his
attention largely to plants of economic importance. His
initial duties were to travel extensively through the
Transvaal in order to meet farmers and establish the agri-
cultural needs of the province. Particular attention had to
be paid to finding new plants with economic potential,
specific pasture plants, and problem plants such as weeds
and poisonous plants. At the same time he was to collect
and preserve plant specimens which would provide a
base for identifying and expanding the knowledge of the
Transvaal flora. The day after commencing work this
new appointee set about collecting material and famil-
iarising himself with the flora around Pretoria. Over the
next 10 years he collected some 14 000 specimens.
In his first annual report for the year ending 30th June
1904, Burtt Davy wrote: The development of the
Colonial Herbarium, which is essential to the work of the
Division, had to be postponed from lack of assistance to
poison, label, mount and sort into their cases the large
number of specimens collected. The Legislative Council
has been asked for a small fund with which to start the
Herbarium and we intend to push for it vigorously dur-
ing the coming year.’
He managed to appoint, as caretaker of the herbarium,
Sydney Margaret Stent (Figure 7) who joined the staff in
September 1904. Although initially only a technical
assistant, she became a self-taught botanist of note and
her knowledge of grasses resulted in her being given the
title of Agrostologist in 1922. She was a competent illus-
trator and her line drawings appear in many of her own
articles as well as in those of Burtt Davy. An interesting
snippet appeared in Gwen Gill’s column in the Pretoria
FIGURE 7. — Sydney Margaret Stent.
274
FIGURE 8. — Illtyd Buller Pole Evans, Mycologist and Plant
Pathologist, Department of Agriculture, 1905.
News in 1984: ‘March 10, 1920: Sydney Stent cast her
vote in the General Election to become the first woman
to vote in South Africa. She had been included in the
electoral roll by mistake because of her masculine-
sounding name.’
In his 1906 report Burtt Davy remarks: ‘It was once
thought that the needs of the Department would be met
by a comparatively small herbarium of the economic
plants but as time goes on the necessity for a larger and
more complete herbarium becomes increasingly evi-
dent.’ It is clear then that here was the man responsible
for the planting of the embryo of what was finally to
grow into the National Herbarium, an institution which
by 1989 had grown to a collection of more than one mil-
lion specimens.
It was soon evident that there was an urgent need for
a plant pathologist to deal with the plant diseases that
were all too rapidly attacking the crops and pastures of
the farmers. These farmers were doing their best to estab-
lish an economic agricultural foundation after the years
of war and instability.
The red-haired Welshman, Illtyd Buller Pole Evans
(Figure 8), aged 26, was appointed to the post of
Mycologist and Plant Pathologist in July 1905 and joined
Burtt Davy in his single office in the Volkstem Building.
Pole Evans had specialised in mycology and plant
pathology at Cambridge after obtaining his B.Sc. at the
University of South Wales. Until that time no attempt
had been made to study the life history and development
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
of fungi in South Africa — they had simply been collect-
ed and, in most cases, sent to Europe for determination
and classification.
It could not have been easy for these two men with
very different personalities and ambitions to share an
office. A wooden partition was erected between them and
when wanting to communicate, it is said they threw notes
over the top of the dividing screen.
In his annual report of 1907 the Secretary of
Agriculture remarked: ‘The value of the work being done
in Pretoria in the field of South African plant pathology,
although clearly established, is not yet sufficiently appre-
ciated, but I have no hesitation in predicting that the
Colony will, in time to come, reap still greater benefits
from the energy and forethought of the Department in
securing the services of the present plant pathologist.’
These were to prove prophetic words.
It was clear that, like’Burtt Davy, it was necessary for
Pole Evans to have an assistant. After failing to find a
suitably qualified person, Ethel Doidge (Figure 9) was
appointed, on probation, in 1908. As with her chief, this
was to be an appointment with far-reaching conse-
quences. Doidge became Principal Plant Pathologist in
1912 and held the post for 30 years until her retirement
in 1942. The publication in 1950 of her work The South
African fungi and lichens was a fitting monument to her
years of dedicated service.
In spite of the poor facilities, the work of the Botan-
ical Division continued to increase steadily and the farm-
FIGURE 9. — Ethel Doidge, Principal Plant Pathologist, Department of
Agriculture, 1912-1942.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
275
ers, after being rather unco-operative at first, began to
understand the teaching and worth of the new
Department of Agriculture. As far as Pole Evans was
concerned, conditions for practical research were almost
non-existent, but nevertheless, he had soon studied a
large number of diseased specimens and preliminary
steps could be attempted to avoid the spread of diseases
throughout the country. However, one of the most serious
problems was that there was no control in the neighbour-
ing colonies and Pole Evans realised the importance of
there being one uniform system of control and centrali-
sation of all such matters throughout South Africa. This
could of course only be brought about by a unified
Department of Agriculture which was to take some time
to materialise.
In the period 1910-1911, Burt Davy concentrated
principally on the development of the maize industry and
the investigation of pasture plants. At the Experimental
Station at Skinner’s Court (Figure 10) to the west of
Pretoria, a total of 744 experimental plantings of maize,
other cereals, fodder plants and fibre and oil plants, were
carried out. Considerable expense was involved as mate-
rial was introduced from all parts of the world. However,
results were encouraging and it was felt that the initial
opposition to new and unknown crops was gradually
being overcome.
Perhaps one of the most significant introductions at
that time was that of the kikuyu grass from Kenya, then
part of British East Africa. Burtt Davy reported that
‘through the courteous assistance of Mr David Forbes we
received, in good condition, a rooted plant of the kikuyu
grass. This has been planted out and has made vigorous
growth — it is a promising species for cultivation in the
warmer parts of the country.’ Little did he realise at the
time how vigorous and how important this grass, which
had actually been transported in an empty jam tin, was to
become in its new homeland. By 1917 it was possible to
distribute 542 bags of kikuyu to farmers and others and
it was considered that the species was one of the very
best all round grasses to have been introduced into the
country. It had also been discovered that, apart from its
value as a soil binder to combat erosion and as a pasture
grass, it could ‘make an exquisite lawn when properly
looked after.’
The distribution of seed of various crops and pasture
plants to farmers continued steadily throughout these
early years and in 1911 alone, a total of 29 686 lbs found
its way onto the lands.
Apart from his work on maize and other crops, Burtt
Davy was very much involved with investigations into
poisonous plants that caused stock losses. In 1911 he was
particularly concerned with discovering the possible
cause of lamsiekte which was responsible for large num-
bers of cattle fatalities. He records that during that year
he travelled 19 248 miles by rail in connection with plant
poisons and noxious weeds. With the 50% reduction in
the cost of railway tickets, which was allowed for official
duties, the travelling costs were £67-8s-9p. In spite of all
the investigations into lamsiekte, it was to take years of
research before it was eventually discovered, in 1927,
that this fatal stock disease was not caused by a plant at
all. The culprit was an anaerobic bacterium, Clostridium
botulinum , which is found in decomposing animal mat-
ter. Fodder plants growing on sandy soil have a low
phosphate content and animals seek out old bones —
which are often infected with the bacterium — to com-
pensate for this deficiency.
When Union was proclaimed in 1910, various alter-
natives on the structure of the new Department of
Agriculture were considered but, pending the report of
the Public Service Commission, the agricultural work of
the four provinces continued much as before. By the end
of 1911 the new organisation had been finalised and
under the new system, two separate divisions of
Agrostology and Botany, and Plant Pathology and
Mycology were proposed. During the initial discussions
on re-organisation, these two separate divisions had been
recommended by the Public Service Commission. But
the Secretary for Agriculture was of the opinion that
FIGURE 10. — Maize breeding expe-
riment at Botanical Experi-
mental Station, Skinner’s
Court — millet field, 1910/1911.
276
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 11. — Illtyd Buller Pole Evans, Chief of the Division of
Botany & Plant Pathology, later Division of Plant Industry,
1913-1939.
experiments with crops and plant breeding, seed testing
and the identification of plants for farmers, could be car-
ried out more economically and even profitably at the
Agricultural Schools. Although he agreed with the dele-
gation of experiments with field crops and other plants to
the Agricultural Schools and Experiment Stations, Burtt
Davy wrote that a fully qualified botanist would be a sine
qua non at those institutions and he was of the opinion
that a small Division of Botany would still be required at
headquarters to act as ‘advisor in chief’ to the
Department.
It has always been acknowledged but never ceases to
amaze, how history repeats itself. In 1988 the staff of the
Botanical Research Institute, in the throes of amalgama-
tion with the National Botanic Gardens, could appreciate
only too well the report tabled in 1911 by Burtt Davy
regarding his Division: ‘It has been difficult to carry on
the work of the Division effectively during the year
under review, owing to the unsettled state of the Civil
Service. This naturally affected each individual to a
greater or lesser degree according to his or her feeling of
insecurity. It is impossible to obtain the maximum of
efficient work from those who are in such an unsettled
state of mind.’ He went on to express his thanks to his
staff for their loyalty and strenuous efforts to maintain
the reputation of the Division.
In spite of all the uncertainty in the Department,
herbarium work during this period was steadily increas-
ing in extent and importance and was daily becoming
more difficult to cope with. Burtt Davy complained that
other herbaria in the country, smaller and with no eco-
nomic determinations to deal with, had two assistants.
With the separation into two divisions, Burtt Davy’s
and Pole Evans’ relationship was further tested and there
was obviously dissension on their respective budgets.
Burtt Davy in fact refused to provide an account of the
revenue and expenditure of his division as the accounts
of the Division of Plant Pathology and certain other sec-
tions had been lumped with his for accounting purposes.
He felt it was ‘manifestly unfair and misleading’ to
charge the other items to his vote!
By 1913 the work of the Division of Botany had been
greatly restricted owing to the transfer of part of its
duties to the Schools of Agriculture and the consequent
reduction of staff. Burtt Davy was informed that it was
intended to finally abolish the Division, and the only
assistant left on his staff was under notice of transfer. He
was also informed that once a College of Agriculture was
established in Pretoria, his services would probably no
longer be required.
It was obviously as a result of the unsettled state of
affairs that in October 1913, Burtt Davy resigned from
the post that he had occupied with distinction for ten
years. He moved to Vereeniging where he engaged in the
breeding of farm seeds for a time before returning to
England to take up an appointment at Kew. There he
finally managed to produce the publication for which he
is probably best remembered, namely The flowering
plants and ferns of the Transvaal with Swaziland.
Unfortunately Burtt Davy died before the entire work
was completed and only two volumes of this excellent
handbook were published.
With Burtt Davy’s resignation, the Division of Botany
which was originally to have been abolished, was amal-
gamated with Pole Evans’ Division of Plant Pathology
and Mycology and the combined sections were again
simply named the Division of Botany.
In his first report as chief of the new Division, Pole
Evans (Figure 11) paid tribute to Burtt Davy’s remark-
able energy and alertness and his considerable contribu-
tion to agriculture, and particularly the maize industry in
the country. In the same report he stated ‘it has been my
painful duty to bring before you, year after year, the
urgent necessity of establishing a properly equipped and
suitably situated central Mycological Laboratory for the
Union. By a suitably situated laboratory is meant a com-
posite building, standing apart, and enclosed with at least
10 acres of ground suitable for experimental purposes.’
On the 26th January 1913, after these continued
requests for better facilities, it was decided to move Plant
Pathology and Mycology to the house Vrede (Figure 12)
situated on the southwestern slope of Meintjies Kop. This
commodious dwelling had originally been built by Edward
Meintjies, son of Stephanus Meintjies who had owned a
large tract of land which included the hill on which the
Union Buildings were to be built, and after whom the
‘Kop’ was named. The house fell vacant when General
Barry Hertzog resigned as a minister in the new Union
Government, and Pole Evans managed to lay claim to it.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
277
FIGURE 12. — Laboratory for Plant Pathology and Mycology, Vredehuis , 1913.
The establishment of the Division in its own grounds
was to mark the beginning of development which was to
go from strength to strength under the dynamic leadership
of Pole Evans. However, the botanical section comprising
all the herbarium specimens under the care of Miss Stent
could not be accommodated in the new headquarters and,
together with Entomology, was moved to a private house
on the comer of Wessels and Church Streets (Figure 13).
This was most unsatisfactory and in 1914 Pole Evans
reported that it would be a great help if sufficient addi-
tional rooms could be added to Vredehuis to accommodate
the old Division of Botany. Pole Evans was a man who set
his sights on a goal and did not rest until he got what he
wanted. It was not long before the first special herbarium
building was constructed to house the ever increasing col-
lection. In May 1915 the herbarium was moved from its
temporary home in Church Street to a new building that
had been erected next to the Phytopathological laboratory.
The building (Figure 14) consisted of a single room 10 x
5 m, into which the existing herbarium was tightly packed
in 48 cupboards. It was necessary to store a quantity of
specimens in adjoining outhouses.
Over a period of years Pole Evans arranged for the
acquisition of a number of important plant collections.
The Colonial Herbarium in Durban together with the ser-
vices of its Director, John Medley Wood were acquired
and in about 1916 donation of the two valuable collec-
tions of E.E. Galpin and Max Hoppe proved that the
Pretoria collection was receiving deserved recognition.
It was during this period that two more appointments
were made that were also to have a profound influence on
botanical research in South Africa. Mary Gunn (Figure 15)
was appointed as a temporary clerical assistant with a
knowledge of typing. Government appointments were
obviously rapidly expedited in 1916, because the young
Miss Gunn was informed by letter that if she was ‘desirous
FIGURE 13.— Head Office of the
Division of Entomology, cor-
ner of Wessel and Church
Sts. Temporary home of botan-
ical herbarium and Sidney
Stent, 1913-1915.
278
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 14 — The first building
especially built in May 1915
to house the herbarium col-
lection. Inez Verdoom stands
at the entrance many years
later.
of offering her services’ she should report to Miss Doidge
the following day. She immediately started work at a
salary of five shillings and sixpence a working day. Mary
Gunn was to devote the next 60 years lof her life to botany
and particularly botanical literature. The knowledge she
gained and the works she managed to obtain for what was
eventually to become a renowned botanical library named
in her honour, again proves how a single appointment can
effect the development of an institution.
At the same time the young Inez Verdoorn (Figure
16), newly matriculated, was appointed as an herbarium
assistant and like her colleague, was to devote more than
60 years to the cause of botanical research. The destiny
of these two young women (Figure 17) was perhaps
determined by fortuitous remarks: Mary Gunn found her
typing somewhat tedious and spent considerable time
examining the workings of her wristwatch. On observing
this, Pole Evans suggested her time would be better spent
examining botanical books. Inez Verdoorn enquired of
her supervisor why two plants that looked so similar
should have different names. ‘Find out yourself by study-
ing Flora capensis' was the reply — and so she did. She
virtually became a self-taught botanist and the education
FIGURE 15.— Mary Gunn
FIGURE 16. — Dr Inez Verdoom.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
279
FIGURE 17. — Women staff — Botany & Plant Pathology, 1919 Back row, L to R: Misses V. Bottomley, E. Tenant, K. Lansdell, A. Bottomley, Z.
Findley, DrE.M. Doidge, Ms S.M. Stent Sitting, L to R: Ms I Verdoom, Ms King, Mrs Stocks, Misses I. Tambline, E. Linde, M.D. Gunn,
K. Vos.
she acquired in the Division was so invaluable that in
1967 she was awarded an honorary doctorate by the
University of Natal.
During the period 1917-1918 the greatest problem fac-
ing the Division was the outbreak of citrus canker, and a
systematic inspection of citrus orchards throughout the
country had to be undertaken. Drastic measures were nec-
essary, and in spite of considerable antipathy from farm-
ers, all infected trees were destroyed. The ruthless cam-
paign was completely successful and later appreciated by
all who had been affected. Because of the canker problem,
little attention could be paid to the botanical resources of
the country, but steps were already being taken to organise
a botanical survey of South Africa. In the ensuing years
Pole Evans was able to launch himself afresh into the
expansion projects he envisaged for his department.
In 1918 the herbarium was further enriched by sever-
al valuable gifts amongst which were 648 Swiss plants
donated by the Onderstepoort veterinarian, Arnold
Theiler. Theiler had had a close association with both
Burtt Davy and Pole Evans during investigations on poi-
sonous plants. The friendship between Theiler and Pole
Evans resulted in frequent visits to their respective head-
quarters and in a close relationship of the staff of the two
organisations.
With the impressive expansion that the herbarium had
undergone since the move to its new premises, it was
recorded in the 1918 report that ‘henceforth the herbari-
um will be known as the National Herbarium.’
Once Pole Evans had time to devote himself to his
proposed botanical survey work he travelled widely, col-
lecting, recording and photographing the major vegeta-
tion types of the country (Figure 18). On his recommen-
dation a Botanical Survey Advisory Committee was
formed in 1918 to co-ordinate botanical research in var-
ious parts of the country. Results of this work were pub-
lished in Botanical Survey Memoirs , the first of which
appeared in 1919 and was entitled Phanerogamic Flora
of the Division of Uitenhage and Port Elizabeth. It was a
paper by Professor Selmar Schonland of Rhodes Uni-
versity, who was a member of the Botanical Survey
Committee.
To say that Pole Evans travelled widely, recording and
photographing the major vegetation types of the country,
is a rather glib statement, considering how difficult it was
to do this kind of work in the early part of the 20th cen-
tury. Transport was slow and often arduous and pho-
tographs were taken on large unwieldy glass plates — a
magnificent black velvet cloak lined with red satin, under
which he had to retire to take his first photographs, is a
treasured possession in the Institute archives. The black
and white photos on these plates were hand-painted, usu-
ally by his wife, to provide realistic reproductions of the
fields he was covering. In 1920 The veld, its resources
and dangers was published and he divided the country
into 19 botanical regions. Although earlier vegetation
maps of the country had been produced, this work of Pole
Evans could be considered the stimulus and forerunner to
Acocks’s Veld types of South Africa which first appeared
280
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 18. — The joys of field work.
in 1953. It was not long before a special botanical survey
vehicle was presented, with considerable ceremony, to the
Division (Figure 19). Although somewhat top-heavy and
a problem in sand and mud it was a considerable
improvement on earlier means of transport (Figure 20).
Within two years of the appearance of Botanical
Survey Memoirs Pole Evans had initiated two more pub-
lications. In 1920 the first part of The Flowering Plants
of South A frica appeared. Later renamed The Flowering
Plants of Africa, this publication exemplifies the value of
botanical art and each illustration is accompanied by a
botanical description and information of general interest.
In 1921 the first volume of the periodical, Bothalia, was
published. This journal was named in honour of General
Louis Botha, first Prime Minister of the Union of South
Africa and also Mininster of Agriculture until 1913. Full
credit must be given to Pole Evans whose vision inspired
the initiation of three publications which were to become
known and respected by botanists throughout the world.
Because of the botanical survey work, Pole Evans
suggested that a direct link with Kew could be extreme-
ly useful. Taxonomic problems that could not be solved
in South Africa could be attended to personally by a rep-
resentative at Kew which was then, and is still consid-
ered by many, to be the botanical mecca of the world.
Approval was sought from the Minister of Agriculture
for the establishment of a post and the Director at Kew
was requested to select a suitable incumbent. Miss Amy
Corbishley, who had received her botanical training
under Professor Bews at the Natal University College,
happened to be in London at the time and she was offered
the post by the Kew Director. She accepted the position
and in 1919 became the first South African Liaison
Officer at Kew, thus initiating a tradition that endured for
seventy years and, as was initially envisaged, proved to
be an invaluable link between the two organisations.
The herbarium accessions were increasing at a rapid
rate and in 1919-1920 the curator Dr E.P. Phillips,
FIGURE 19. — Presentation of
Botanical Survey vehicle to
Pole Evans. Front row, L to R:
Government Garage driver,
Pole Evans, Williams (Secre-
tary of Agriculture), Mrs
Kemp, Kemp (Minister of
Agriculture).
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
281
FIGURE 20. — Field transport in the early days of Burtt Davy and Pole Evans.
reported: ‘I must again refer to the lack of suitable
accommodation, as was done in my last report. The orig-
inal government herbarium I estimated at 8 000 mounted
sheets; last year 5 724 sheets were mounted and this year
9 727, a total of 15 451 for two years. It has been impos-
sible to file the mounted sheets in the cabinets and they
have been stacked on top of the cabinets up to the ceil-
ing.’ He goes on to make a statement which could only
be looked on with horror in later years. He says ... ‘in this
connection there is one point which should not be over-
looked. It is not necessary to use a separate mounting
sheet for each specimen, but the speciments of two or
three collectors may be placed on the same sheet. This is
of course impossible to do at present owing to the fact
that the mounted sheets are not accessible.' One shudders
to think what chaos could have resulted from Phillips’
suggestion and one can only be thankful that the speci-
mens were inaccessible.
During that year two valuable acquisitions were
added to the herbarium. Madame Dieterlen presented her
entire Basutoland (Lesotho) collection to the government
and the late H.G. Flanagan’s herbarium and botanical
books were bequeathed to the Division. The cabinets
containing these collections were all placed in the small
Pretoria herbarium and as practically the entire floor
space was covered, Phillips complained that there was no
working room left for him! It must therefore have afford-
ed much relief when, in 1923, the herbarium was at last
moved into a spacious new building which had been
especially constructed to house the ever-increasing
botanical collections (Figures 21, 22).
It was during 1924 that another important new under-
taking was started. This w'as the establishment in Cape
Town of the Low Temperature Research Unit whose task
it was to investigate methods to improve the export of
perishable fruit. By 1927 a special laboratory had been
opened for this purpose but it was unfortunately hard
pressed to produce results due to the evergreen problem
of lack of staff.
During the mid-twenties another staff appointment of
great importance was made. Allen Dyer became assis-
FIGURE 2E — The ‘new’ National
Herbarium, 1923.
282
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 22. — Inez Verdoom and
Jim Howlett in ‘new’ Herba-
rium.
tant to Professor Schonland at Grahamstown and also
curator of the Albany Museum Herbarium. This
appointee was later to play a significant role in South
African botany.
Under the direction of Pole Evans, already being
looked upon as an empire builder, the fields of research of
the Division were widened to include Entomology and
Horticulture in 1927. With the inclusion of a Field Hus-
bandry Section two years later, the title of the organisa-
tion was changed to the Division of Plant Industry. Head-
ings of the chapters of the annual report of 1929 give an
indication of the fields that were being covered at the time:
1, Botanical Work — which included botanical survey,
experimental stations and the National Herbarium; 2,
Field Husbandry — involving controlled research work in
the production of various field crops and also assistance
to the farmer; 3, Entomology — which was involved in
the control of insect pests as well as offering assistance
with the rapidly expanding bee-keeping industry; 4,
Horticulture — which, apart from work on fruit and flori-
culture that year, included the establishment of the
Nelspruit Research Station; 5, The Wine Industry —
where information on all branches of viticulture and
wine-making were provided; 6, Plant Regulatory
Services— which, apart from control on plant imports,
included nursery registration and inspection; 7, Low
Temperature Research — improvement of perishable food
exports; 8, Inspection of Fruit — which involved reports
on all fresh, deciduous and citrus fruits as well as dried
fruit exports; 9, Plant Pathology and Mycology — cover-
ing virus diseases of a large number of crops as well as
collections for the Cryptogamic Herbarium; 10, Locust
Administration — involving investigations of hatchings
and destruction of hoppers, as well as assistance to farm-
ers who were affected by these outbreaks.
It is mind-boggling and almost inconceivable that a
single man could cope with the leadership involved in
directing so many different facets of this composite
organisation. However, his dedication and energy were
an inspiration to those who worked for him and he was
served with great loyalty, particularly by the female
members of his staff who adored him!
Pole Evans’ interest in the country’s natural vegeta-
tion had also led to the establishment, in the early 1920’s,
of the Dongola Botanical Reserve in the baobab world of
the northern Transvaal (Northern Province). This was an
area of which he was particularly fond and he loved
nothing more than setting off on a safari with his life-
long friend General Jan Christiaan Smuts and together
they would tramp the dry bushveld in search of new
plants. Smuts had a prodigious memory which enabled
him to store and retrieve botanical knowledge with such
ease that he was considered a botanist of note in spite of
having had no professional botanical training.
As far as field research facilities were concerned, a
notable event in 1929 was the establishment of a veld
reserve at Fauresmith where Swiss-born Dr Marguerite
Henrici (Figure 23) was to do invaluable work over a
period of almost 30 years. A second veld reserve was
later to be established at Worcester in 1934. In 1930, 174
morgen of land was also acquired at Rietondale, Pretoria,
for the purpose of testing fodder grasses and conducting
feeding experiments. This work was in addition to that
carried out at the Prinshof Station, and Pole Evans’ mas-
ter plan was to establish a ring of parks, gardens and
experimental research facilities in Pretoria.
By 1933 Pole Evans was again complaining that more
accommodation was essential for the herbarium. He also
stated that further assistance was required if the staff was to
carry out its main function of research on the indigenous
vegetation. During the year three extra rooms were acquired
when a new storey was added to the herbarium erected in
1923 (Figures 24, 25). This enabled all the so-called rough
work to be done outside the herbarium proper and it made
for far better working conditions. The cryptogamic herbari-
um was also provided with a large room in the new storey
which provided facilities for visiting mycologists. During
1929 the plant pathological section had moved into adjacent
new quarters consisting of four research laboratories and a
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
283
FIGURE 23. — Marguerite Henrici
with A.O.D. Mogg in the
Vryburg District in the early
1920’s.
large general laboratory. The complex, now with a number
of buildings housing the different sections was still, and
would always be, known as Vredehuis.
Meanwhile considerable progress was being made
with several phases of botanical survey and results of
great practical importance were accruing. It was reported
that ‘much light is being thrown on such problems as
veld burning and overstocking and the general improve-
ment of our natural pastures.’ One has perforce to won-
der where management goes wrong when, more than 50
years later, the country still faces many of the same prob-
lems investigated by researchers half a century ago.
In 1934 the House of Assembly expressed concern at
the serious deterioration of the natural vegetation cover
and the threat to the country’s water resources. A pro-
gramme submitted by Pole Evans was adopted as a basis
for immediate action and this included the formation of a
Pasture Research and Veld Management Section within
the Division of Plant Industry. Pole Evans’ last full-scale
project before his retirement was the establishment of a
series of Pasture Research Stations in representative vege-
tation regions throughout the country. In his second
progress report on this project, published in 1939, he stat-
ed ‘Grass is the foundation of man's existence, in our land
as in all others. It is suprising that there should be any who
are slow to recognise this and some even loth to admit it.’
He added ‘It is my obvious duty again to draw your atten-
tion to the fact that large areas of the country which for-
merly were rich and flourishing pastoral grounds are now
wholly depleted of their grazing and are rapidly becoming
desert wastes. Nothing but the establishment of well-
equipped pasture research stations in these areas can bring
any permanent relief and restore health to the land and
wealth to the people.’ It is ironic that in 1989 the Institute
was to lose posts to the State’s Pasture Research Centre to
support a new initiative which aimed to accomplish exact-
ly what Pole Evans had recommended 50 years earlier.
FIGURE 24. — Additional storey add-
ed in 1933 to the National
Herbarium building.
284
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 25. — Vredehuis next to
National Herbarium and
plant pathology laboratories
in Vermeulen St, below the
Union Buildings, Pretoria.
Throughout all the years that Pole Evans was directing
the research in his Division, he still found time to cover
many thousands of miles investigating indigenous plant
covers, pasture grasses and conservation methods. Apart
from South Africa he travelled west to Bechuanaland
(Botswana), east to Portuguese East Africa (Mozam-
bique) (Figure 26) and northwards as far as Lake
Tanganyika. But it was in 1938, a year before he was to
retire, that he undertook his most extensive expedition. At
the request of the Kenyan Government he travelled to that
country to advise them on their soil erosion and pasture
problems. He covered a distance of 20 000 miles through
tropical Africa collecting over 700 living grasses, a large
number of seed samples and almost 2 000 botanical spec-
imens. This trip was a fitting climax to his almost 30
years of duty in a department he had served with such
dedication, energy and distinction. He could also not have
provided a more appropriate parting gift to the National
Herbarium than his fine collection of tropical species.
In 1939, with the retirement of ‘P.E.’ or ‘the Chief’, as
he was affectionately called, it was obvious that no sin-
gle person could take over all the duties he had carried
out so dynamically. The Division of Plant Industry was
fragmented and botanical research was once again placed
in a Division of Botany and Plant Pathology, which was
to be headed by Dr E.P. Phillips.
On his first visit to his old Division after retirement
Pole Evans enquired ‘Have they finished dissecting the
carcass to their satisfaction yet?’
It was the end of an era.
FIGURE 26. — Pole Evans in Portu-
guese East Africa.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
285
FIGURE 27. — Edwin Percy Phillips. Chief of the Division of Botany
and Plant Pathology, 1939-1944.
THE SECOND ERA, 1939-1972
The newly organised Department of Agriculture,
instituted on 18 September 1939, comprised five new
Divisions, namely: 1 , Animal Husbandry and Agronomy,
2, Soil and Veld Conservation — responsible for all func-
tions and services relating to erosion, pasture research
and weed eradication; 3, Horticulture — which was to
include the existing fruit inspection and viticulture; 4,
Entomology — including locust inspection; 5, Botany and
Plant Pathology comprising the existing structures of
botanical research, botanical survey and plant pathology.
The new Division of Botany and Plant Pathology
included the headquarters, still at Vredehuis in Pretoria,
and Botanical Stations in Durban, Grahamstown,
Pietermaritzburg and Buffelspoort (between Pretoria and
Rustenburg) and also a subtropical research station at
Nelspruit.
Dr Edwin P. Phillips (Figure 27) was appointed to
succeed the redoubtable Pole Evans as Chief of the
Botany and Plant Pathology Division. Having worked
under Pole Evans for 21 years, Phillips had first-hand
knowledge of the workings of the organisation although
he now had to determine the exact needs and direction of
the newly constituted division.
The five year term of his leadership was a period of
relative uncertainty as World War 2 had broken out. This
resulted in a number of staff joining the armed forces and
budgets being severely cut. Notwithstanding these prob-
lems, Phillips continued to encourage the publication of
research findings and this was one of his main contribu-
tions to the growth of the Division. In his early days as
curator of the herbarium he had become aware of the
importance of detailed information attached to plant col-
lections. He encouraged the completion of comprehen-
sive plant labels during his years in charge and it became
evident in later years that his initial guidance had signif-
icantly effected the standard of labelling of many plant
collectors.
During his time as herbarium curator he had under-
taken the exacting task of producing The genera of South
African flowering plants which had appeared in 1926. As
Chief of the Division he continued to publish prolifical-
ly and was also aware that his ‘genera’ would need to be
updated in the future. This he managed to do after his
retirement and the revised work was published in 1951.
With the retirement of Phillips in 1944, after a rela-
tively short period in control, a new leader had to be
found. Dr Allen Dyer, having been in the organisation for
twenty years was strongly recommended by General J.C.
Smuts as the new Chief. Prime Minister Smuts and Dyer
had become close friends after initially being introduced
by Pole Evans, and Smuts’ botanical expertise and knowl-
edge of the appointee was recognised as having played a
major role in the final decision of the authorities.
Allen Dyer (Figure 28) had strong ideas of what he
envisaged for the growth of his Division. One of the first
steps he took was to reactivate the botanical survey of the
country by establishing an official Botanical Survey
Section within the Division. It was to this new section that
FIGURE 28. — Robert Allen Dyer. Chief, later Director of the Botan-
ical Research Institute, 1944—1963.
286
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 29 — John Phillip Hanson Acocks (1911-1979).
John Acocks (Figures 29, 30) was transferred in 1945.
Acocks had joined the Division of Plant Industry in 1936
and under Pole Evans had been involved in botanical
analysis of pastures as well as vegetation studies. He was
responsible for the original concept of a ‘veld type’ and
when posted to the newly formed Botanical Survey
Section was entrusted with the enormous task of prepar-
ing a detailed vegetation map of South Africa. He travel-
led extensively and his method of mapping was so suc-
cessful that within eight years he had sufficient data to
prepare a comprehensive vegetation map and accompa-
nying text. Veld Types of South Africa is a classic work in
the field of South African botany and since it first
appeared in 1953 has twice been updated, namely in 1975
and 1988. On Acocks’s death in 1979, Dyer wrote ‘In his
specialized field of plant geography Acocks is without
peer amongst botanists both past and present.’ Acocks
perfected the art of botanical collection and recording of
detail and his meticulous labels set a standard difficult to
emulate by contemporary or future collectors.
The Prinshof Experimental Station in Pretoria was
designated the headquarters of the revived Botanical
Survey Section and was also to be the major plant intro-
duction station. The main emphasis on seed plantings at
Prinshof was directed at indigenous trees and shrubs, but
grasses and pastures were not neglected. In addition, poi-
sonous and medicinal plant material was submitted to
veterinary researchers at Onderstepoort for testing.
Working in the Pasture Research Section at the time
was Dr Leslie Codd another staff member who was later
to influence the growth of the Botanical Division. After
qualifying in South Africa, Codd had studied at Cam-
bridge University in the UK and the Imperial College of
Agriculture in Trinidad. After five years as a plant breed-
er in British Guiana, he returned to South Africa where
he joined the Pasture Research Section of the Depart-
ment of Agriculture in 1937.
FIGURE 30. — Staff photo, September 1963. Standing at back: D.J B Killick, G J Anderson, J.C. Scheepers, O.A. Leistner, B. de Winter, R G.
Strey, M.J Wells, S.W. du Toit, A.F J Visagie, Ms I.C Verdoorn, H H. von Broeinbsen, J.PH. Acocks, RJ. Grobler, H R. Tolken, Mrs. C.L.
Forssrnan (Cythna Letty), E G Oliver, L.E. Codd, Mrs H.G. Codd, RJ. Muller, P van der Merwe, Mrs M M Vogts Kneeling and sitting:
Ms C. Lcmmer, Mrs R van Wyk, Ms A van den Berg, Mrs E. van Hoepen, Ms I van Vuuren, Ms H. Gilliland, Ms R. Venter, Ms E. van
Rensburg, Ms R van Wyk, Ms E. Liebcnberg, Mrs T. Creffield, Ms H Gerber, Mrs A. A. Mauve, Ms C Liebenberg, Ms M. Bennett, B.
Vogts, Mrs M. Coetzec, Ms J Prinsen, Ms C. de Groot, D. Edwards.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
287
FIGURE 31. — The first avenue of trees of Bolusanthus leading up to
the entrance to the National Herbarium building, Pretoria,
planted by Jan Erens.
In the field of Plant Pathology, research continued on
maize and other cereal diseases. Of great importance was
the economic effect of plant diseases on crops such as
citrus, subtropical fruits, sugar-cane and vegetables, in
particular potatoes. The latter problem was researched
extensively by Dr James van der Plank who was the
senior mycologist at the time. He was later to become
Chief of the Division of Plant Pathology when it was
separated from Botany in 1951.
In a presidential address to the South African Asso-
ciation for the Advancement of Science in 1942, Dyer
put forward his vision of a ‘pan-African botanical poli-
cy’. As a result, steps were taken to acquire collections
from tropical African countries and the exchange of
specimens with a number of African herbaria resulted in
a considerable increase of tropical material in the
National Herbarium.
With the continued growth of the Division it became
obvious that the limited garden facilities available at
Vredehuis would never provide sufficient scope for the
development of a meaningful botanic garden. This should
be able to provide essential facilities for propagation,
experimental plantings and specialist glasshouses. After
consideration of a number of prospective areas it became
obvious that 60 hectares of ground which formed part of
the Pretoria University’s Agricultural Experimental Farm,
to the east of Pretoria, would be the ideal location. The
land earmarked for the garden had proved unsuitable for
experimental work by the Agricultural Faculty as it was
cut off from the main farm complex by a major road. The
extremely poisonous Dichapetalum cymosum , commonly
known as gifblaar was also present in large quantities
which disqualified the site as a grazing area for cattle.
Dyer initiated negotiations with the University in 1945
and the land was duly acquired by the State. At the same
time a number of private properties on the northern slopes
of the hill, which ran east-west, were identified as essen-
tial additions to the new property. These would ensure
both northern and southern aspects to the garden, thus
providing a variety of microclimates. This was vitally
important for the successful cultivation of plants from the
widely diverse regions of the country. Soon after June
1946, Mr Jan Erens (Figure 38), head gardener at the
Division of Botany, planted the first avenue of trees
(Figure 31) in the new garden and one of Dyer’s dreams
was realised.
After the establishment of a garden the next step was
obviously the planning of a new building which would
provide a future home for the Division. Preliminary plan-
ning started in 1950 but it was to take more than 20 years
before the old buildings at Vredehuis were vacated for
the move to the new headquarters.
In the meantime the work of all sections of the
Division continued steadily. Under Dyer’s influence tax-
onomic and herbarium activities were stimulated and
staff numbers increased to cope with the additional load
of identifications, mounting and filing of specimens. One
of the new staff members was A.D.J. Meeuse who, after
20 years as a botanical researcher in Holland, joined the
BRI in 1952. He was a taxonomist of note and although
only on the staff until 1960, he produced monographs on
Convolvulaceae, Cucurbitaceae and Sapotaceae. He con-
tinued his research on his return to Holland. In 1953 the
important Transvaal Museum Herbarium was transferred
to the National Herbarium. This noteworthy donation
consisted of approximately 40 000 specimens including
a number of types and other valuable material. Mrs
Reino Leendertz Pott, then aged 84, was an honoured
guest at the presentation. Her own contribution to the
herbarium, which she had personally started as a young
girl in her early twenties, was almost 6 000 specimens.
In 1960 the regional units at Durban, Grahamstown
and Kimberley were increased by the acquisition of the
Stellenbosch University Herbarium. The value of these
outside units was not only that the workload of the
National Herbarium was decreased but that specialists in
these areas were able to concentrate their research on
regional issues.
During these years it became evident that Harvey’s
Flora capensis , of which the first volume had appeared in
1860 and the final volume in 1933, had become hope-
lessly outdated. Revisions of certain families and genera
were appearing regularly but the ideal solution seemed to
be a revision of the entire flora. Dyer obtained support
from the Department of Agriculture for this bold venture
and the first volume of the Flora of southern Africa was
published in 1963. It was initially estimated that this
comprehensive standard series would eventually com-
prise about 30 volumes.
288
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 32. — Leslie Edward Wostall Codd. Director of Botanical
Research Institute, 1963-1973.
The demand for quantitative information in botanical
survey work led to the establishment in 1962 of a
Quantitive Ecology Unit to undertake research into
methods of botanical analysis. This unit was of assis-
tance to a wide range of organisations who experienced
problems with the analysis of information.
In 1963, the purchase of the ground on which the gar-
dens had been established, was finalised. At the same
time a further four hectares of land, adjoining the north-
ern side of the garden, were bought. At last Dyer could
start with positive plans to realise his second dream which
was to build a new home for the Institute in the garden he
had initiated twenty years earlier. Additional herbarium
space was becoming an urgent priority and it was fortu-
nate that future expansion could now be planned.
In the garden, plant accessions were continuing at a
good rate. Mr Johannes Admiraal had succeeded Jan
Erens as the garden horticulturist in 1952. He was
Curator of the garden from 1965 until 1977 and was
largely responsible for the initial landscaping and layout.
He planted a great many Acacia species which con-
tributed to an atmosphere of the African savannah. Dave
Hardy who joined BRI in 1958, helped build up the col-
lection of succulent and other greenhouse plants. A large
glasshouse was set aside for plantings of his extensive
assemblage of personally collected Madagascan plants.
This important collection from the Indian Ocean Island
included a number of endangered species and was to
become a highlight of a visit to the nursery. Although the
garden had originally been started mainly for the purpose
of assisting research projects it was now being appreciat-
ed as a public amenity as well.
With Dyer’s retirement in 1963, Dr Leslie Codd
(Figures 30, 32, 38) assumed the position of Director.
One of his top priorities was to press ahead with plans to
move to new headquarters. Numerous building plans
were considered and after overcoming problems with
budget restrictions, consideration of tenders and the
inevitable State Ted tape’, construction finally got under
way in 1970 (Figure 33).
In 1967 a detailed survey was initiated in conjunction
with the Conservation Section of the International
Biological Programme. The aim was to systematically
assess the conservation status of the various vegetation
types in the country. This would enable conservationists
to plan future programmes based on sound knowledge.
Marinus J.A. Werger came to South Africa from Holland
and although only employed in the Botanical Survey
Section from 1968 to 1973 his development of the
Braun-Blanquet method of botanical survey was to be a
milestone in the field of quantative analysis.
It was in 1968 that a start was made by two staff mem-
bers, Drs D. Edwards & O.A. Leistner on a completely
FIGURE 33.— The new building of
the Botanical Research Insti-
tute, Pretoria under construc-
tion, ± 1970.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
289
FIGURE 34. — The completed building in 1973.
new method of recording distribution data for collec-
tions. Until then, magisterial districts had been used as
locality references but the new system utilised latitude-
longitude squares. Leistner (Figures 30, 38) joined the
BRI in 1957 and was stationed at the regional unit in
Kimberley until 1963. From 1965-67 he served as liai-
son officer at Kew and on his return he headed the
Herbarium Section. At the same time as work started on
the new distribution data format, an index of localities in
South Africa was initiated by Leistner & Morris. This
gazetteer, using the quarter degree square reference, list-
ed 42 000 place names and was published in 1976. Apart
from using the index as a straightforward gazetteer, the
plan was to also use it to obtain ‘grid references’ for the
existing herbarium collections. This innovation was the
first step in the building up of a computerised data bank
for the National Herbarium, and the Institute was later to
become a leader in the field of computerised botanical
information. The data bank was largely devised by Dr
Jeff Morris (Figure 38), who had joined the Botanical
Survey Section in 1 966. As a result of his expertise in the
computerisation of botanical data and quantitative botan-
ical analysis, he later headed the Data Processing and
Ecosystem Studies Section.
Construction work on the new main building had start-
ed in 1970 and during the next few years preparatory steps
were being taken for the transfer of the National
Herbarium, as its new home was due for completion early
in 1973 (Figure 34). The last privately owned northern
property was finally purchased so that the garden now
formed a complete unit of 77 hectares. As a result of its
continued development, the garden now had representa-
tives of about 5 000 indigenous species including those
growing naturally in the undeveloped sections of the kop-
pie and open veld areas. This constituted about one third
of the indigenous flora. The nursery collection of approx-
imately 28 000 plants represented about 2 500 species and
included special groups such as orchids, ferns, succulents
and the notable Madagascan species.
Although work on economically important plants
such as weeds, poisonous, medicinal and food plants had
been in progress for some time, it was only in 1970 that
a separate Economic Botany Section was formally estab-
lished and headed by Michael J. Wells (Figures 30, 38)
who started in the Botanical Survey Section in Pretoria in
1957. In the economic botany field, one of Wells’ most
important publications was the Catalogue of problem
plants in southern Africa , published in 1986. A number
of co-operative assignments were undertaken and one
with the National Chemical Research Institute of the
CSIR involved the search for plants containing alkaloids.
Botanical Survey projects continued but as the percent-
age of conserved areas in South Africa was considered to
be extremely low, the urgency of greater efforts in this
field was recognised. For the first time, colour aerial pho-
tography was being used in the evaluation of vegetation.
Within a few years this aerial photography information
was to be succeeded by the use of satellite imagery. The
use of photography from the Earth Resources Satellite,
‘ERTS-1’, provided startling evidence of the invasion of
grasslands and other areas by the False Karoo vegetation.
With the aid of a multi-spectral viewer, ecological bound-
aries could now be plotted and vegetation changes moni-
tored. The satellite images were also extremely successful
in recording veld fires and a project proposal on fire mon-
itoring was given preliminary approval by NASA
(National Aeronauties and Space Administration, USA),
for the next ERTS satellite to go into orbit around the
earth. Dr Denzil Edwards (Figures 30, 38), who joined the
Botanical Survey in 1960 and was to become an Assistant
Director in 1973, was the principal investigator for South
Africa to NASA from 1975.
THE THIRD AND FINAL ERA, 1973-1989
On the 2nd July 1973 the new head office building of
the Botanical Research Institute was formerly opened
and with this landmark it seemed that the second era, that
had started with Pole Evans’ retirement, had been com-
pleted. The third and last period in the history of the
Institute which began at that time, was to end with the
amalgamation of the BRI with the National Botanic
Gardens of South Africa in 1989.
290
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 35. — Bernard de Winter. Director of Botanical Research
Institute, 1973-1989.
Dr Leslie Codd, who had been so closely involved in
the entire concept of the new home for the Institute, was
present at the unveiling of the plaque in the foyer of the
building just before his retirement.
was in charge from 1959 until his appointment as Assis-
tant Director in 1963.
This was the dawn of the computer age and during
1974 the new mainframe computer of the Department of
Agriculture became operational. The Institute was pro-
vided with four terminals. To establish a Data Bank of
the herbarium collections, information had to be
obtained from almost 500 000 specimens. De Winter
realised that computer information would play an
increasing role in the development of the Institute and
the mammoth task of encoding was tackled with enthusi-
asm. A team of twenty encoders and eight supervisors,
working after hours, were able to process about 16 000
specimens a month.
In the same year, perhaps as a result of the new sur-
roundings and excitement about future progress, two
new herbarium records were established: 30 000 plant
specimens were identified for researchers, farmers and
the general public and at the same time 29 000 new spec-
imens were filed. This material was the result of staff
collecting expeditions, donations and exchanges with
herbaria throughout the world. It was obvious that the
computer was going to prove an invaluable asset when
details of these collections were encoded.
Work on the Flora of southern Africa continued
steadily while botanical survey work covered areas
stretching from the northern Transvaal (Northern
Province) bushveld to the Cape fynbos. On the econom-
ic botany front material for cancer research was identi-
fied and shipped to the USA in a co-operative pro-
gramme and research on problem plants such as weeds,
continued.
Dr Bernard de Winter (Figures 30, 35, 38) took over
the reins as Director in 1973. Like his two predecessors,
De Winter had come through the ranks of the Institute
since his appointment in 1947. He served a spell as Kew
Liaison Officer in the early fifties and was closely asso-
ciated with the Botanical Survey Section of which he
In the garden, the areas which had been established 1 5
to 20 years earlier needed attention, but it was estimated
that with the exclusion of the east-west sandstone ridge,
almost half the total area was intensively to semi-inten-
sively developed. A notable feature of the garden now
became the large wrought-iron gates designed and exe-
FIGURE 36. — Gate to garden, 1975
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
291
FIGURE 37. — Gate to National Her-
barium.
cuted by Hans Brugger and placed at the two southern
entrances. The Reynolds Gate (Figure 36) at the main
entrance, depicting a number of Aloe species, was erect-
ed to the memory of Dr Gilbert Reynolds, optometrist
and authority on the genus Aloe. As amateur but enthusi-
astic botanist, Reynolds had been guided by Inez
Verdoorn and Allen Dyer and had had a long association
with the Institute. His outstanding publications Aloes of
South Africa and The aloes of tropical Africa and
Madagascar were certainly worthy of commemoration.
The second gate, at the entrance leading up to the main
building, depicts numerous genera of monocotyledons
including Agapanthus, Dierama and Strelitzia (Figure
37).
The Institute was privileged during these years to
have the services of retired directors, Drs Dyer and
Codd, who were still to make noteworthy contributions
to botany. Both continued with taxonomic research but
they also presented botanical science with two major
publications. Dyer’s two volumes of Genera of southern
African plants appeared in 1975 and 1976. Codd, in co-
operation with ex-librarian Mary Gunn, officially retired
since 1954, produced the remarkable Botanical explo-
ration of southern Africa (1981). Mary Gunn’s extraor-
dinary knowledge of botanical exploration had been
stimulated by Pole Evans many years earlier and she had
spent a lifetime seeking out the stories behind the travels
of the first collectors. Codd’s writing skills, and Mary
Gunn’s information resulted in a publication which is a
standard work in its field. Mention should be made here
of the Mary Gunn Library set in its excellent accommo-
dation in the Institute. The collection of books which
Mary Gunn had built up virtually single-handedly over a
period of more than 50 years had, by this time, become
the largest botanical library in Africa. Publications cover
taxonomy, ecology, morphology, anatomy, plant geogra-
phy, history of botany, palaeobotany and economic
botany. The majority of works relate to African botany
but there is also extensive representation of works on
other floras of the world. In a special safe reside many
rare and priceless works procured by Mary Gunn. The
acquisition of many of these books was seldom simple
and funds were usually lacking, so unconventional ways
and means had to be used to make the necessary transac-
tions. Some of the most noteworthy of the rare works are
Redoute’s Liliaceae (1802-1808), Jacquin’s Stapeliarum
(1806), Bergius’s Descriptiones plantarum ex Capite
Bonae Spei (1767) and Harvey’s personal copy of his
Genera of South African plants (1838). Apart from the
selection of books, the library also has a wide range of
journals as well as microfiche and computer facilities.
In 1976 an Advisory Committee for Botanical
Research was appointed by the Mininster of Agriculture
to report on the status of the botanical sciences in South
Africa. It was felt that because of the intensification of
environmental problems it was essential to establish
what direction botanical research should follow both in
the Department of Agriculture and the private sector.
Great pressure was being exerted in the fields of taxono-
my, ecology and economic botany and specific guide-
lines were of prime importance.
By 1977 all 480 000 southern African specimens,
housed in the National Herbarium when encoding start-
ed, had been processed. In spite of difficulties with pro-
grammes and the costs involved in retrieval, steady
progress was being made with the system and a plan of
what could be achieved in the future was formulated.
Publications initiated more than 50 years earlier were
still going strong. The Flowering Plants of Africa was
into its 44th volume, Bothalia Volume 12 appeared and
Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa was
into its 41st volume. It is perhaps appropriate at this
point to mention the important contribution made by the
botanical artists employed by the Institute. Their main
contributions were the illustrations which appeared in
the The Flowering Plants of Africa series but their work
also appeared in numerous other publications. Most
renowned of all artists employed through the years was
undoubtedly Cythna Letty (Figure 30). She had joined
the Division of Plant Industry, under Pole Evans, in 1927
292
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
and for many years was the main illustrator for The
Flowering Plants of Africa. She contributed over 740
plates to this publication alone, and set a proud tradition
to illustrators who followed in her footsteps when she
retired in 1968. Cythna Letty, together with her col-
leagues Inez Verdoorn and Mary Gunn formed a tri-
umvirate who together served the BRI for over 150
years. These legendary ladies were sometimes fondly
referred to as ‘the Three Graces’.
Concerted efforts were being made to speed up the
production of the Flora of southern Africa and with the
collaboration of additional contributors, including over-
seas researchers, it was hoped that publication of com-
pleted volumes as well as fascicles would accelerate.
On the occasion of its 75th Anniversary in 1978, the
Institute had reason to look back with pride on its
achievements since the initial small beginnings in the old
Volkstem Building. To celebrate the event, a luncheon
was served in the garden and aptly the guests were
served with a memorable array of dishes prepared from
indigenous plants. In his opening address. Dr de Winter
stated that features which had distinguished the develop-
ment of the institute ‘were the friendly spirit and deep
sense of dedication shown by those who made it their
life’s work to further the cause of botany in this botani-
cally bountiful land.’
It was fitting that during this year of celebration of the
past, the herbarium data bank, which was to play such an
important role in the future, was to officially be named
PRECIS. This acronym is derived from PRE (the Index
Herbariorium code for the National Herbarium) and
Computerised Information System.
Garland Elizabeth Russell (nee Gibbs) (Figure 38)
joined the Flora of southern Africa team in 1979 and ini-
tially worked on grass taxonomy, but one of her major
contributions to the BRI was the restructuring, with fel-
low American Dr R. Magill, of PRECIS. She headed the
Data Sub-section prior to returning to the USA shortly
before the amalgamation.
The study of southern African mosses and liverworts,
which had been largely neglected, was greatly stimulated
by the American bryologist Dr R.E. Magill (Figure 38)
who started work on contract to the Institute in the mid-
seventies. A checklist of 585 species of mosses and 317
species of liverworts was completed, an exchange system
with overseas researchers was initiated and work for the
Flora of southern Africa began. A completely new filing
procedure for the approximately 14 000 moss specimens
was introduced and these were placed in upright packets
housed in special card index cabinets.
A significant addition to the taxonomic research facil-
ities was now the acquisition of a scanning electron
microscope. The SEM was utilised by Dr. Saric Perold
(Figure 38) in her extensive investigation and research of
the liverworts of southern Africa. She was also to use this
new-age instrument as an important aid to other
researchers as the study of leaf, style, seed and pollen
surfaces can assist with species delimitation.
Approaching the end of the decade it was again
stressed that environmental problems necessitated good
management, optimum utilisation and conservation of
southern Africa’s vegetation. It was considered essential
that the number of researchers in the fields of taxonomy
and ecology should be increased. Priority areas in ecolo-
gy were the fynbos of the winter rainfall area of the Cape
and the coastal and adjacent terrestrial habitats.
The regional herbaria in Durban, Grahamstown and
Stellenbosch continued to provide a service both to
botanists and the general public. However, the South
West African Herbarium, having celebrated its 25th year
of association with Pretoria, was in the process of being
taken over by the Administrator-General of SWA prior to
the independence of the territory to be renamed Namibia.
On the 25th October 1979 the garden was declared a
National Monument, a fitting honour for what had be-
come a national asset. Dr R.A. Dyer, who had been so
intimately involved in its establishment and develop-
ment, had the distinction of unveiling the commemora-
tive plaque. The main benefit of the gardens new status
was that it would be safeguarded against expropriation in
perpetuity.
The extension of the series of botanical inventories
was now broadened to include palaeobotany. Dr John
Anderson joined the BRI in 1 974 as a palaeobotanist and
was responsible for the development of the extensive
fossil collection. He produced the first volume of the
Palaeoflora of southern Africa in 1983. The fossil col-
lections, derived from 45 localities spread throughout the
Molteno Formation, were housed in specially designed
cabinets and contained about 5 000 specimens.
A minor restructuring of the sections of the Institute
took place in the early eighties and six separate sections
with their incumbent responsibilities were recognised.
These were: 1, Herbarium Services — identification and
taxonomic information; 2, Flora Research — research
and preparation of publications for the Flora of southern
Africa, including the Palaeoflora; 3, Plant Structure and
Function — originally, plant anatomy and cytogenetics
had been the responsibility of Flora Research but these
disciplines were now accorded sectional status; 4,
Ecology — the former Botanical Survey Section, contin-
ued to study the vegetation of the country and its ecolog-
ical relationships; 5, Data processing and Ecosystem
Studies — this was shortly to be reorganised. PRECIS had
become a production system and one of the useful facil-
ities it was able to provide was a distribution map of any
species in the data bank; 6, Plant Exploration — the for-
mer Economic Botany Section. Although still involved
in weed research the practical work in this field had been
taken over by the newly formed Weed Research Unit of
the Plant Protection Research Institute; 7, Garden —
responsible for the maintenance and development of the
garden to serve both as a research facility and a garden
for the pleasure of the public.
A review of the annual report of 1979/80 serves to
illustrate the range of botanical work with which the
Institute was busy at the time and to draw comparisons
with the mandate of the sections established by Pole
Evans 50 years earlier.
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
293
FIGURE 38. — Staff of the Botanical Research Institute on the occasion of the Biennial General Staff Meeting, 19-21 August 1980. 1, Dr J.W.
Morris; 2, R.P. Ellis; 3, Dr L.E.W. Codd, 4, Dr D.J.B. Killick (Deputy Director); 5, Dr B. de Winter (Director); 6, Dr D. Edwards
(Assistant Director); 7, H.C. Taylor; 8, M.J. Wells; 9, Dr J.C. Scheepers; 10, Dr O.A. Leistner; 11, Mrs E. Brink; 12, Dr I.C.
Verdoorn; 13, Mrs A. A. Mauve; 14, E G. H. Oliver; 15. T.H. Arnold; 16, Dr R.E. Magill; 17, Mrs S. Smit; 18, Mrs E. van Hoepen;
19, Mrs J. Mulvenna; 20, Mrs N. Miller; 21, Mrs V.M. Engelbrecht; 22, Mrs B.A. Momberg; 23, Mrs L. du Toit; 24, Ms E. Retief; 25,
D.F.M. Venter; 26, Mrs M.J. A. W. Crosby; 27, Ms C. Reid; 28, Mrs B.F. Lategan; 29, Mrs E. Ebersohn; 30, Ms W.G. Welman; 31, Mrs
A M. Verhoef; 32, Ms C.A. Liengme; 33, Mrs C.F. Fourie; 34, Mrs J. Gerke; 35, Mrs R.M. Wikner; 36, Ms E.N. Pare; 37, Mrs C.M.
van Wyk; 38, Mrs P.W. van der Helde; 39, Ms C.E. Smith; 40, Mrs i.J Joubert; 41, Mrs L.R. Filter; 42, Mrs K.A. Kleynhans; 43, Mrs
S.M. Perold; 44, Mrs M.M. Loots; 45, Mrs D.M.C. Fourie; 46, A. Smith; 47, B. Curran; 48, B D Shrire; 49, Ms K.L. Immelman;
50, Mrs J.H. Jooste; 51, Mrs N. Nigrini; 52, Mrs M.C. van Niekerk; 53, Mrs A. M. Fourie; 54, Mrs J. Rautenbach; 55, Mrs C.A. Bester;
56, Mrs J I M. Grobler; 57, Mrs M E M. Venter; 58, Dr G.E. Gibbs Russell; 59, Mrs S.J Smithies; 60, A. A. Balsinhas; 61, Dr P.J.
Weisser; 62, P. van Eden; 63, H.J. de Villiers; 64, Mrs I. R. Leistner; 65, Mrs R. Botha; 66, Mrs E. Evenwel; 67, Mrs J.B. Hoffmann;
68, J. van Rooy; 69. Mrs A. J. Engelbrecht; 70, Mrs G.E. Hussem; 71, Mrs S.M. Thiart; 72, Mrs A.D. Bronkhorst; 73, Ms E. Boon; 74,
G. Germishuizen; 75, D A. Davies; 76, C.H. Stirton; 77, Mrs A. Gill; 78, C.F. Musil; 79, Ms N. van der Meulen; 80, Ms K.J. Duggan;
81, Mrs K.P Clarke; 82, Ms L. Henderson; 83, Ms R J. Parsons; 84, Ms B.C. Radmacher; 85, Mrs Q.L Radmacher; 86, R.H. Westfall;
87, J. Erens; 88, G.B. Harding; 89, T.A. Ankiewicz; 90, J. Conradie; 91.G B Deall; 92, FA. Brusse; 93, C Boucher; 94, Dr M.C.
Rutherford; 95, B.M. Campbell.
Herbarium Services Section
The four herbaria identified almost 20 000 speci-
mens for Institute personnel, a number of State depart-
ments, universities and the general public. Approxi-
mately 2 000 visitors were received, professional, lay,
international and local. At headquarters in Pretoria, the
cryptogamic collection was provided with separate
accommodation in the basement of the building and the
rapidly expanding fossil collection was provided with
specially designed steel cabinets also housed in the
basement. Old wooden herbarium cabinets, which had
been moved with the collections from Vredehuis, were
gradually being replaced by new modular steel cabi-
nets.
Flora Research Section
Flora Research was initiated in 1976 and Dr Leistner
headed the team. Work continued on a wide range of
genera and families for the Flora series including two
volumes on bryophytes and the first volume of the
Palaeoflora of southern Africa. Brochures on 20 of the
most important water plants in the country were in press
and a publication on the Pretoria flora was making good
progress. Initial work by Dr L.E. Codd and Miss M.
Gunn for their publication on botanical collectors was
almost complete.
Falling under this section was the post of liaison
officer at Kew. Initiated 60 years earlier by Pole Evans,
294
Bothalia 28.2 (1998)
it continued to provide research opportunities and inter-
national contacts for the incumbent, who also provided
information to South African colleagues. This post was
much prized by Institute staff and it was an honour to
be chosen to serve the two to three year period in Eng-
land.
Plant Structure and Function Section
It was envisaged that with the status afforded this sec-
tion, applied taxonomic and biosystematic studies could
be expanded. The primary plant anatomy project at the
time was one on grass-leaf anatomy which was yielding
interesting results. Besides his anatomical research, Dr
Roger Ellis (Figure 38), who joined the BRI in 1969,
made a significant contribution in the discovery of C3 &
C4 pathways in grasses. In the field of cytogenetics, stud-
ies were concentrated on Lantana camara and the genus
Rubus , both important problem plants in the country.
Ecology Section
The work of this section covered three main fields of
activity: 1, the identification, description and mapping of
various vegetation classes; 2, the study of the ecological
relationships between different types of vegetation and
the behaviour of plant communities; 3, the development
of various methods and techniques required for ecologi-
cal studies of vegetation, i.e. experimental ecology.
With the untimely death of John Acocks in 1979, the
revision of his monumental work, although well
advanced, received a severe setback. Acocks had retired
in 1976 but had been re-employed to complete his revi-
sion of Veld types of South Africa. Fortunately, the data
and valued observation notes accumulated during his
lifelong survey work were to be safely stored at the
Institute for use by future researchers.
Numerous other projects were in progress including
Transvaal bushveld studies, aquatic ecology, coastal
studies in Natal and a number of vegetation surveys in
the Cape Province. Dr J.C. Scheepers (Figures 30, 38),
who headed the section, had joined the Botanical Survey
in 1960. He contributed significantly to the National
Conservation Plan which included the handling, storage
and mapping of data on conserved areas in South Africa
and also assisted in the establishment of a computer data
bank for ecology.
Data Processing and Ecosystem Studies Section
Although shortly to be dissolved as a section, it was
responsible for the provision of data processing facilities
for research purposes to the Institute, as well as under-
taking plant ecological research at the ecosystem level.
Plant Exploration Section
The section was compiling a National Weed List
which was regarded as an essential catalogue for future
research on problem plants. Another project dealt with
the origin and evolution of the primitive crops Sorghum
and Pennisetum, and the conservation of germ plasm.
Barrier plants, tree distribution in the Transvaal and a
scientific information service were amongst the varied
fields covered by the section.
Garden Section
The garden had been without a curator for almost two
years and responsibility for the section fell on the shoul-
ders of the two acting curators in charge of the nursery
and the garden itself. Landscaping of the water garden,
karoo and grassland areas were major developments dur-
ing the year. Garden records were in the process of com-
puterisation which was to be of great benefit in biome
planting lists as well as in keeping track of ever increas-
ing experimental plantings. The curator’s post was even-
tually filled by the appointment of Daniel Henry (Danie)
Dry in 1983. He actively promoted closer contact be-
tween the public and the garden; he started plant sales to
the public and developed nature trails through the natur-
al vegetation on the ridge bisecting the garden. He also
initiated a bird list for members of the public who visited
the garden.
The year 1982 was marked by an exceptional high-
light for the Institute. AETFAT (Association for the
Taxonomic Study of the Flora of Tropical Africa) held
it’s tenth congress in Pretoria. Although an organisation
involved in tropical African flora, it had never before met
on the African continent. With financial support from the
Department of Agriculture, the BRI and the South
African Association of Botanists were able to make the
disparate arrangements necessary to stage a congress of
this size. Considerable assistance was provided by the
Symposium Secretariat of the Council for Scientific and
Industrial Research (CSIR) and the latter also provided
ideal facilities for the event. Eighty overseas botanists
attended the congress and, as can well be imagined, the
influence and contribution of a number of world botani-
cal authorities was considerable. An important workshop
session on the Flora of southern Africa was attended by
59 botanists. Subsequently a panel consisting of directors
and senior researchers of leading botanical organisations,
both local and international, submitted a report to the
Minister of Agriculture documenting the urgency to
complete this work (Figure 39). The congress was an
outstanding vehicle for promoting awareness amongst
the international botanists of progress being made in
South Africa across a broad spectrum of botanical
research. The event was brought to a memorable climax
when a formal banquet was held for 300 guests who were
served a five-course meal prepared from indigenous
fauna and flora.
During the same year Codd & Gunn’s Botanical
exploration of southern Africa was published. This epic
work, so generously and diligently worked on by two ex-
staff members who had retired many years earlier was a
tribute to botanical science. It once again proved that
people involved in the discipline were prepared to devote
years of service to their subject, often with no prospect of
remuneration.
Another important publication of the year was the
appearance of the illustrated volume on mosses in the
Flora of southern Africa series. Magill had left South
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
295
FIGURE 39.— Flora Workshop be-
fore the 10th AETFAT Con-
gress, Pretoria, 23-28 Janu-
ary 1982. Front row, L to R:
Dr P. Bamps (Belgium), Prof
O. Hedberg (Sweden), Prof.
E.A.C.L.E. Schelpe (SA), Dr
PH Raven (USA), Dr B. de
Winter (SA), Prof. J.P.M
Brenan (Kew, UK). Row 2:
R.B. Drummond (Zimbab-
we), Dr O.A. Leistner (SA),
E.G.H. Oliver (SA), Dr F.M.
Getliffe Norris (SA), Dr PJ.
Cribb (Kew, UK), Prof. D.
Muller-Doblies (Germany).
Row 3: C.H. Stirton (SA),
L.C. Leach (SA), Dr A.J.M.
Leeuwenberg (Netherlands),
Dr E. Launert (UK), Dr
N.K.B. Robson (UK), Row
4: R.O. Moffet (SA), Dr H P
Linder (SA), Dr PD F. Kok
(SA), Prof. J.J.A. van der
Walt (SA), Prof. D.J. Botha
(SA), Prof. Papendorf (SA),
DrD.J.B. Killick (SA).
Africa on completion of his contract but continued his
work on local mosses in the USA. Apart from mosses,
the lichen collection was also receiving attention and
with the rapid expansion of accessions, new cabinets
similar to those which housed the fossils, were pro-
vided.
An accommodation change during the year saw the
Plant Structure and Function Section move to Velcich
House on the northern slopes of the ridge. This spacious
double-storey home which had been on one of the private
properties purchased many years before, provided the
section with welcome new laboratory and office space.
With this move the herbarium building was freed of the
potential fire threat created by inflammable laboratory
materials.
In 1983, perhaps as a direct result of the stimulus cre-
ated by the AETFAT congress the year before, the cre-
ation of three national working groups was proposed. It
was hoped that these groups would be able to provide
positive steps to accelerate research in three specific
fields, namely Vegetation Ecology, Phytosociological
Nomenclature and the Flora of southern Africa. The
renewed contacts and co-operation resulting from the
congress and full use of all available manpower would
surely guarantee more rapid results. But it was clear that
in the absence of support from the State, the completion
of the Flora would depend on a separately funded
national co-operative programme.
With the creation of an Experimental Ecology Section
in 1983 it was hoped that the additional applied research
would help to halt the continuing deterioration of the
plant cover in southern Africa. However, it was now
obvious that the subcritical size of many teams was a
major factor in the lack of definitive results. The use of
computers continued to be a significant asset, and an
important product of the PRECIS data bank in 1984, was
the publication of the List of species of southern African
plants (Figure 40). This list of 24 000 species and infra-
specific taxa (which was edited by Trevor Arnold and
Mrs Carol de Wet), was a landmark in the cataloguing of
the flora. Trevor Arnold (Figures 38, 40) joined the BRI
in 1973 and served as the Kew Liaison Officer from
1977 to 1978. He worked in the Economic Botany
296
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
FIGURE 40. — Trevor Arnold at the
launch of the ‘black book’ —
Plants of southern Africa:
names and distribution , in
1984.
Section on germ plasm and the origin of primitive crop
plants of Africa before becoming Head of the Herbarium
in 1984.
In his annual review of the Institute’s work for the
period April 1984 to March 1985, Dr de Winter writes:
‘it is a disconcerting fact that the two main projects of the
BRI, namely the Flora of southern Africa and vegetation
surveys are lagging behind because of insufficient sup-
port. State funds are being found for creating other
botanical posts of a much less urgent nature. As pointed
out before, the lack of support for priorities as vital as
these can only be attributed to the fragmented state of
botany and biology as a whole in South Africa. Can we
allow this state of affairs, which threatens our future, to
continue?’ By 1998, out of an envisaged 41 FSA vol-
umes, three introductory, two cryptogam, five flowering
plants volumes and parts of 14 other volumes, as well as
1 1 FSA contributions in Bothalia , have been published.
Twelve of the proposed volumes have received no input
at all. Sadly, the drive and enthusiasm to complete the
Flora has diminished recently and one wonders when
South Africa will be able to join the world list of pub-
lished floras (see plan of FSA in Bryophyta, Flora of
southern Africa,\99S).
The annual report in 1986 again noted a steady erosion
of available research funds due to minimal growth of the
economy and continuing inflation. A startling 11% of
research posts were unfilled. In spite of the lack of
research funding, the herbarium was to undergo alter-
ations costing about R1 000 000. These included the pro-
vision of air-conditioning and fire-protection for the
herbarium and library, a new room for the Scanning Elec-
tron Microscope and an extension to the basement which
was to house new plant-driers and also deep-freezers for
specimen sterilisation. Another purchase during the year
was a minibus fitted as a special collecting vehicle. The
roofrack was designed to carry 12 plant presses and the
rapid drying of material would be of great benefit to col-
lectors. Roll-up awning shelters for use in unfavourable
weather and a two-way radio would certainly have been
envied by Pole Evans when one remembers the large
cumbersome vehicle, presented to him for his botanical
survey work more than 60 years before (Figures 19, 20).
A Biosystematics Division was formalised in 1985.
All earlier sections in the BRI were now referred to as
Divisions. The function of the new division which was
headed by Dr O.A. Leistner, was to provide for the sci-
entific and technical editing of the Institute publications
and this in-house supervision was to greatly facilitate the
preparation of manuscripts for publication. For many
years before this new division was created, Dr D.J.B.
Killick (Figures 30, 38) was the editor of the publications
produced by the BRI. He joined the Botanical Survey
Section in 1950 and was Kew Liaison Officer from
1954-57. After heading the Botanical Survey from
1963-66 he led the Flora Research team until 1969 prior
to his second spell as Liaison Officer at Kew. He became
Assistant Director in 1971 and Deputy Director in 1973.
Apart from botanical survey work where he specialised
in mountain ecology, he was involved in general taxono-
my and also made a considerable contribution to taxo-
nomic literature and botanical nomenclature.
The Experimental Ecology Division which was head-
ed by Dr Michael Rutherford (Figure 38) was moved to
Cape Town in 1986, in order to facilitate effective study
on the Fynbos and Karoo biomes. The former biome was
increasingly under threat from alien invaders. Rutherford
had joined the Ecology Section in 1980 and after
Acocks’s death, was closely involved in utilising the for-
mer researcher’s vast store of information housed at the
Institute.
In 1986/87 a departmental committee was appointed
to investigate all botanical sections in the Department of
Agriculture and Water Affairs. Some fields of botany
were being practised in a number of different State
departments and il was essential to reach a decision on
the exact mandates of these organisations. There were
talks of rationalisation of State and semi-state botanical
activities in South Africa and it was feared that the BRI
Bothalia 28,2 (1998)
297
may be fragmented and that it might, in fact, even cease
to exist.
Commenting on possible developments, Dr de Winter
stated in his 1987/88 annual report that ‘the loss of one
of the major botanical research organisations of interna-
tional importance in the Southern Hemisphere would be
a major disaster and would cripple the development of
botany in the country.’ However it was also clear that
rationalisation of existing botanical activities and the
amalgamation of the BRI and the National Botanic
Gardens of South Africa stationed in Cape Town could,
in the long term, yield major benefits for all.
For a number of years the threat of total dismember-
ment of the BRI was to create a great deal of uncertainty
and unhappiness in the BRI. It is a credit to the staff at
the time that research continued at a relatively steady
pace and that the Institute journals appeared on schedule.
The 50th volume of Flowering Plants of Africa appeared
in 1988, 68 years after the first volume so proudly pre-
sented by Pole Evans, and early in the same year the third
edition of Acocks’s classic work was published. It con-
tained updated plant names and many new and more rel-
evant photographs.
It was with a certain amount of relief that the final deci-
sion on the destiny of the Institute was accepted. On the
1st April 1989 the BRI amalgamated with the National
Botanic Gardens of South Africa to form the National
Botanical Institute. From its small beginnings in a single
room in 1903 the organisation had grown into a renowned
institution involved in many facets of botanical research.
Colleagues from diverse scientific disciplines world wide
had benefited from the expertise available and the co-
operation which was always so readily given. A wide sec-
tion of the general public had also grown to appreciate the
services provided by the Institute as well as the tranquili-
ty and beauty of a garden which had been developed from
a wild patch of veld over a period of just more than fifty
years.
No major changes were envisaged in the future func-
tioning of the various divisions and it was hoped that the
science of Botany in South Africa would be best served
by the birth of the new organisation. However, it was the
end of a memorable period extending over 86 years, dur-
ing which, under the leadership of only six directors, the
Botanical Research Institute had established a notewor-
thy place for itself in the annals of botanical science both
in South Africa and internationally.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This historical review, initially proposed by Dr B. de
Winter, is dedicated to the memory of Mary Gunn who
enthusiastically guided my first tentative steps into the
past. Her phenomenal recall of personalities and events
brought the early years to life and formed a base from
which the later history unfolded. Encouragement and
assistance from Beverley Momberg and Otto Leistner
and the reproduction of photographic records by Adela
Romanowski are gratefully acknowledged.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Denise Fourie (Figure 38) first joined the BRI as a taxonomist in 1952. For a period of seven
years she was responsible for the identification of Fabaceae, a number of other families and all
Monocotyledons except grasses and sedges. After an absence of 18 years she returned to work in
1977 in the newly created post of Scientific Information Officer. In this capacity she was responsi-
ble for all botanical enquiries except the purely taxonomic. She maintained her link with taxono-
my by undertaking the identification of exotics, also conducted garden tours and authored a num-
ber of semi-popular publications. In her first period of service she was closely associated with Dyer,
Codd and Inez Verdoorn as well as Cythna Letty and Mary Gunn. On her return she joined earlier
colleagues De Winter, Killick, Leistner and Wells. Her intimate knowledge of the BRI for almost
40 years equipped her well for the task of producing this review.
BOTHALIA SPECIALS
Set of all available issues
up to and including:
Volume 27; Contents to Vols 1-20; Contents to Vols 21-25; all existing indices.
Price: R250.00
WE-
fe.
h m
j \/L
I vrl
Price: R28.50
fT- - ~
v njn The history of the
Botanical Research Institute
by Denise Fourie
a reprint of this article in Bothalia 28,2
with an attractive cover
TH
All prices include VAT. Prices are subject to change from time to time.
Postage is excluded. Please consult the latest catalogue.
Available from: The Bookshop, National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001, RSA
Tel. (012) 804-3200 - Fax. (012) 804-3211
BOTHALIA
Volume 28,2
October 1998
CONTENTS
New species and combinations in Bothalia 28,2 (1998) iv
1. Five new species of Lachenalia (Hyacinthaceae) from arid areas of Namibia and South Africa. G.D.
DUNCAN 131
2. A revision of Lachenalia (Hyacinthaceae) in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. A.P. DOLD and
P.B. PHILLIPSON 141
3. FSA contributions 12: Plantaginaceae. H.F. GLEN 151
4. Studies in the liverwort genus Fossombronia (Metzgeriales) from southern Africa. 6. New spe-
cies from Lesotho, Swaziland and Mpumalanga and new records from Lesotho. S.M. PEROLD 159
5. The genus Echium (Boraginaceae) in southern Africa. E. RETIEF and A.E. VAN WYK 167
6. A revision of Ledebouria (Hyacinthaceae) in South Africa. 2. Two new species, L. crispa and L. par-
vifolia , and L. macowanii re-instated. S. VENTER and T.J. EDWARDS 179
7. Notes on African plants^
Acanthaceae/Orchidaceae. New records from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. T.J. EDWARDS
and E. HARRISON 187
Amaryllidaceae: Amaryllideae. A new species of Amaryllis from the Richtersveld, South Africa.
D.A. SNIJMAN and G. WILLIAMSON 192
Asteraceae. Key to the species of the genus Hertia in southern Africa. P.P.J. HERMAN 192
Cyperaceae. Coleochloa setifera new to the flora of KwaZulu-Natal. C. ARCHER 190
Metzgeriales-Fossombroniaceae. Fossombronia occidento-africana : is it conspecific with
F. indical S.M. PEROLD 183
8. A reconnaissance survey of the vegetation of the North Luangwa National Park, Zambia. P.P. SMITH 197
9. Wetland plant communities in the Potchefstroom Municipal Area, North-West, South Africa. S.S.
CILLIERS, L.L. SCHOEMAN and G.J. BREDENKAMP 213
10. Cytogenetic studies in the genus Pentaschistis (Poaceae: Arundinoideae). K.C. KLOPPER, J.J. SPIES
and B. VISSER 231
11. Obituaries:
David Spencer Hardy (1931-1998). H.F. GLEN 239
Barend Petrus Barkhuizen (1921-1995): amateur botanist, succulent plant specialist and edu-
cator. G.F. SMITH and E.M.A. STEYN 243
Mary Elizabeth Connell (1917-1997). D.J.B. KILLICK 245
12. National Botanical Institute, South Africa: administration and research staff 22 May 1998, publica-
tions 1 April 1997-31 March 1998. Compiler: B.A. MOMBERG 249
13. Guide for authors to Bothalia 261
14. The history of the Botanical Research Institute 1903-1989. DENISE FOURIE 271
Abstracted, indexed or listed in • AETFAT Index • AGRICOLA • AGRIS • BIOSIS: Biological Abstracts/RRM • CAB: Herbage Abstracts, Field
Crop Abstracts • ISI: Current Contents, Scisearch, Research Alert • Kew Record of Taxonomic Literature • Taxon: Reviews and notices.
Accredited with the International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT) Berlin, for the purpose of registration of all new plant names.
ISSN 006 8241
<0 Published by and obtainable from: National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001, South Africa. Typesetting and page layout:
S.S. Brink (NBI) Reproduction & printing: Afriscot Litho (Pty) Ltd, P.O. Box 23663, Innesdale, 0031 Pretoria. Tel (012) 331-3698/9. Fax (012) 331-1747.